Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20142731.tiff HEARING CERTIFICATION DOCKET NO. 2014-64.A RE: A SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT, USR14-0027, FOR MINERAL RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT FACILITIES, INCLUDING OIL AND GAS SUPPORT AND SERVICE (AN OIL AND GAS ROUST-A-BOUT TO INCLUDE A 16,500-SQUARE FOOT SHOP AND PARKING FOR COMMERCIAL AND EMPLOYEE VEHICLES) IN THE A (AGRICULTURAL) ZONE DISTRICT - MICHAEL DECKER, C/O MILLER HFI, LLC A public hearing was conducted on September 3, 2014, at 10:00 a.m., with the following present: Commissioner Douglas Rademacher, Chair Commissioner Barbara Kirkmeyer, Pro-Tem Commissioner Sean P. Conway Commissioner Mike Freeman Commissioner William F. Garcia Also present: Acting Clerk to the Board, Susan Brown Assistant County Attorney, Brad Yatabe Planning Department representative, Diana Aungst Public Works representative, Don Carroll Health Department representative, Lauren Light The following business was transacted: I hereby certify that pursuant to a notice dated July 24, 2014, and duly published July 29, 2014, in the Greeley Tribune, a public hearing was conducted to consider the request of Michael Decker, c/o Miller HFI, LLC, for a Site Specific Development Plan and Use by Special Review Permit, USR14-0027, for Mineral Resource Development Facilities, including Oil and Gas Support and Service (an oil and gas roust-a-bout to include a 16,500-square foot shop and parking for commercial and employee vehicles) in the A (Agricultural) Zone District. Brad Yatabe, Assistant County Attorney, made this a matter of record. Diana Aungst, Department of Planning Services, presented a brief summary of the proposal and explained that the Planning Commission, upon a 3/2 vote (with four members absent), voted against a motion for approval; however, they did not entertain a motion for the recommendation of denial. She noted there will be up to ten (10) onsite employees and 60 drivers with 24/7 operations, and reviewed surrounding property uses and closest residences; 13 letters were received from surrounding property owners, with ten in support and three in opposition. The letters of concern were in regard to noise, dust, views, traffic and reduced property values. A neighborhood meeting was held on August 9, 2014; as a result, the site plan was revised to make the facility closer to the road, with landscaping added to the west and south property lines. The Town of Platteville expressed concerns with the increased amount of oil and gas activity and requested discussion of mitigation and maintenance on County Road 38 prior to approval, and the applicant is entering into a Road Maintenance Agreement with them, as well as a Pre-Annexation Agreement. Ms. Aungst showed views of the property. CC:cP iPL(Pw, f♦L 2014-2731 %g PL2285 HEARING CERTIFICATION - MICHAEL DECKER, C/O MILLER HFI, LLC (USR14-0027) PAGE 2 F Don Carroll, Department of Public Works, provided a brief overview of the transportation plans and requirements, with 450 trips per day. He stated the traffic study indicated turn lanes are warranted at State Highway 60, and will be installed via an off-site Road Improvements Agreement, and a representative of the Town of Platteville is present to address any questions pertaining to that agreement. He also noted there is a letter from Gloria Hice-ldler, with CDOT Region 4, requesting turn lanes at State Highway 60 and County Road 38. Lauren Light, Department of Public Health and Environment, reviewed the water and sewer provisions, stating an engineer designed septic system is required and a revised Waste Handling Plan has been requested to address the disposal of tires, batteries, etc. El Tim Naylor, AGPROfessionals, LLC, representing Michael Decker, gave an overview of the project and said they are adding a request for a 5,000-gallon diesel storage tank, with secondary containment. He said the remainder of the property will be farmed, there was a neighborhood meeting and suggestions were honored with revisions to the site plan. He said traffic was a major concern; however, this road was paved for the gravel pit, and that is an advantage. The property was also reviewed by the Department of Wildlife, with no concerns. The noise from trucks starting up should be abated by the increased distance; this is in a corridor of industrial use, this use is allowed in the A (Agricultural) Zone District, and a Nuisance Management Plan has been submitted. Ii Chair Rademacher questioned why the turn lanes on Highway 60 requested by CDOT were not required of the gravel company. It was noted that the northbound/westbound lane is CDOT's priority. Mr. Carroll confirmed the gravel pit is not active, but he believes they have an active permit, the entire length of the paved road is annexed into Platteville, and the facility will occupy one-third of the acreage. F In response to Commissioner Kirkmeyer, Mr. Naylor said he does not have written comments from Platteville, but the City Manager is present here today. F Shirley Larson, surrounding property owner on COUNTY ROAD38, expressed her opposition to the project due to heavy traffic which endangers children and farmers on the road. She said this increase in traffic is too extreme and requested denial, stating this use is not compatible with the area and will lower her property values. She requested the Commissioners consider her position. She also pointed out her home on the map for Commissioner Conway. F Shari Winterfeld, surrounding property owner, also showed her house on the map, which is on the site's east property line. She stated this was their dream home, a 27-acre site and when she researched the property she did not realize that industry could be placed in agricultural zoning. There are residences on all four sides of this property. She asserted inaccuracies in the minutes of the Planning Commission hearing and summarized that hearing. She concluded this is not an appropriate location for this enterprise and stated her objection to allowing industry in the agricultural zone, which she feels is in conflict with the Right to Farm Statement. She said allowing 24/7 operations completely negates the rights of the neighbors, this will make her home virtually unsellable and undesirable, they may have to leave because they will no longer enjoy the peace and quiet and wildlife, and she concluded by asking how often USR requests such as this are denied. 2014-2731 PL2285 HEARING CERTIFICATION -MICHAEL DECKER, C/O MILLER HFI, LLC (USR14-0027) PAGE 3 F Michael Decker, the landowner selling this property and adjacent landowner to the east, stated that his property was for sale for over a year and a half, he has tried to be a good neighbor. He feels this buyer/applicant will be a good neighbor because he is local and lives just down the road. F Troy Renken, City Manager for the Town of Platteville, reviewed the history of County Road 38 and its future development, saying they want to strongly enforce adequate landscaping with berms and trees. He addressed the traffic increase and the Road Maintenance Agreement they are seeking. In response to Commissioner Kirkmeyer, he said at the time of their Master Plan, in 2010, this area was all Agricultural, but the Town anticipates additional planning to address industrial growth. He said this entire quarter needs to be discussed, and noted there is a 173-acre USR at County Roads 60 and 38 for a not yet built-out subdivision. Ms. Aungst confirmed the official referral from the Town of Platteville mainly requests annexation, which is not yet in writing. F John Martindale, surrounding property owner, stated he is a supporter of private property rights. F In response to Chair Rademacher, Mr. Naylor thanked the Winterfelds and the Larsons for persevering through so many hours of hearings on this project and said the applicants have tried to accommodate the concerns of surrounding property owners: the facility is now 1,200 feet from Ms. Winterfeld's property and the access was changed so trucks don't cross in front of a residence. He said they are willing to work with the Town of Platteville, and addressed the 24/7 operations with the assurance that anticipated operations are 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. (daylight) except for emergencies. Commissioner Conway asked why this location was chosen, rather than the proximate energy park. Mr. Naylor said that this is a local company willing to go through the land-use process; the energy parks are actually almost full and more attractive to out-of-state companies that don't want to go through this process. Commissioner Conway commented that upgraded roads are often annexed and then the upkeep suffers. Mr. Naylor said this is a large road maintenance agreement which will ensure accountability. Commissioner Kirkmeyer asked about the landscaping plan, and was told it is not yet finalized - they are evaluating the best placement of the trees or berming, and as much of the property as possible will remain in agriculture. Mr. Naylor said they will work with the Planning staff to finalize it. Chair Rademacher said there are existing trees to the north, directly to the west is a cedar fence and a berm with farmland to the east. Commissioner Garcia clarified the area to the south and west will be landscaped and there was extensive discussion of the landscaping plans. Regarding the fuel tank, Ms. Aungst deferred to Mr. Yatabe, who concluded that this addition fits into the description of a roustabout operation. F Commissioner Conway brought up the issue of the sign posting location, and Ms. Aungst said she chose the site by the cattle guard to secure the sin vertically so that it was readable, and this is an access so it is an acceptable placement. h Commissioner Garcia stated the requested diesel fuel tank is typically ancillary for this type of operation. Chair Rademacher noted that this is not a large tank and should not be an issue; the Board indicated their consent to the addition. 2014-2731 PL2285 HEARING CERTIFICATION - MICHAEL DECKER, C/O MILLER HFI, LLC (USR14-0027) PAGE 4 IR Commissioner Kirkmeyer commented that the Planning Commission did not actually give a recommendation due to the lack of a quorum, as required by state statute. Commissioner Conway said he is struggling with a decision on that issue. Mr. Yatabe said the Board has the option of sending this back to the Planning Commission; however, they can also move forward, and Bruce Barker, County Attorney, also gave his legal opinion on the situation. F (Clerk's note: The meeting was adjourned at 1:43 p.m. for a brief recess and brought back to order by Chair Rademacher at 1:56 p.m.) Mr. Yatabe spoke at length regarding the question of whether a recommendation by the Planning Commission is statutorily necessary in order for the Board of County Commissioners to make a decision at this time. F Commissioner Kirkmeyer made a motion to remand this matter back to the Planning Commission to be considered by the five members who were present on August 19, 2014, in order for them to make a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners, based on the information they have already heard, and, furthermore, to continue the matter until September 17, 2014, at 10:00 a.m. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Garcia. Commissioner Freeman noted that, if for some reason the Planning Commission can't meet, then this would need to be continued forward on the BOCC docket as well. The motion carried unanimously. This Certification was approved on the 8th day of September, 2014. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS C� WELD WE COUNTY, COLORADO ATTEST: h GC es;,A, }r)o- ,,c_cx � "� b6uglasr Rademacher Chair Weld County Clerk to the Board / LA • rbara Kirkmeye , Prokintf BY. Cr De Clerk t. the Boar7iesr I :' .�'r•+� =:! ` an P. Conway tom. ;r* mutt rt,t_La , - Mike Fr=-m-jir i lia . Garcia 2014-2731 PL2285 • .72 ) L , C w A V4 1 CI a_ M en z LA n ? F F ^ C . \ v 4 r.) p o r2. v 3 � o M o t`^ } w • W atat`, f E� 0 U J • rd 2 2 TC c C 0 a S N 00 i U, 3 a N � F N � ci4y V ft(• •Z � � ^ m a a o cl w C 1\ D � Q � o J 5 (3 C to tr C a ._ • a 3 \-; J - a w � oaTh Z ✓ V Hello