HomeMy WebLinkAbout20141427.tiff FORM 1 - GRANT CHANGE LETTER
NUMBER 2
To The
AGREEMENT
Between the
STATE OF COLORADO
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
DIVISION OF HOMELAND SECURITY AND EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
And
WELD COUNTY
Date: Original Contract #: 14-D4145-011 Original Contract CMS#:63343 CMS Routing#67238
3/21/2014
In accordance with Section §20(I)(iii) of the Original Grant Agreement between the State of Colorado,
acting by and through the Department of Public Safety, Division of Homeland security and Emergency
Management, and WELD COUNTY beginning January 7, 2014 and ending on September 10, 2018,
the provisions of the Grant and any amendments thereto affected by this Grant Change Letter are
modified as follows:
1) Project Description. Grantee shall perform the activities listed in the Project Worksheet(s) (PW),
as listed in Exhibit D-2, which are incorporated into the original Grant by reference herein in
accordance with the provisions of the Original Grant. Exhibit D-2 incorporates the addition of PWs
00489(0), 00561(0), 00574(0), and 00588(0).
PW(s) Budget:
Project Grantee Project
Agreement Worksheet Category Federal Share State Cost- Match Total Project Completion
Contract (PW#) Share Requirement Deadline
Original 00112(0) C $933,811.50 $155,635.25 $155,635.25 $1,245,082.00 3/14/2015
Form I #1 00121(0) C $1,108,312.50 $184,718.75 $184,718.75 $1,477,750.00 3/14/2015
Form 1 #2 00489(0)-/i C $90,214.65 $15,035.77 $15,035.78 $120,286.20 3/14/2015
Form I #2 00561(0),1 C $234,453.38 $39,075.56 $39,075.56 $312,604.50 3/14/2015
Form 1 #2 00574(0) / C $62,743.91 $10,457.31 $10,457.32 $83,658.54 3/14/2015
Form I #2 00588(0) C $375,424.22 $62,570.70 $62,570.70 $500,565.62 3/14/2015
Total $2,804,960.16 $467,493.34 $467,493.36 $3,739,946.86
Co tv‘Mu r`�G CC N I(06 W S CTZ 2014-1427
CONICKID �Vv(f,�, GtF)
5 - - I t-\ CA 038i5 R7 EM co/(o I
Page I oft—Form] 6p ooy-5
Management Costs:
Federal Share from Project Table Available for Management Costs(1.34%)
$2,804,960.16 $37,586.46
2) Price/Cost. The revised maximum amount payable by the State for performance of this Grant is
$3,310,039.96 and the required amount of non-federal/state matching funds, if applicable, is
$467,493.36. The total amount of Management Costs is $37,586.46.
3) Effective Date. The effective date hereof is upon approval of the State Controller or his delegate.
However, see the Original Grant for any costs allowable prior to the effective date.
4) Additional Requirements. None
STATE OF COLORADO ALL GRANTS REQUIRE APPROVAL BY THE
John W.Hickenlooper,GOVERNOR STATE CONTROLLER
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLICS Y
Division of Homeland Sec and E rgency CRS§24-30-202 requires the State Controller to approve
Manage ent all State Grants. This Grant is not valid until signed and
dated below by the State Controller or delegate.Grantee
B / SP/2._ is not authorized to begin performance until such time.If
Kevin Klein,Director Grantee begins performing prior thereto, the State of
Colorado is not obligated to pay Grantee for such
performance or for any goods and/or services provided
Date: y/3 bq hereunder.
STATE CONTROLLER
Robert Jaros,CPA,MBA,JD
By: O
Colorado Department ublic Safety, Thopma J Jugow, Controller
Prrtrvkud t Paotamania OLItC ,
Date: 4 t
Page 2 of 2—Form I
1
Public Assistance FEMA-DR-4145-CO: 14-D4145-011
EXHIBIT D-2-FEMA PROJECT WORKSHEETS
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 1 of 16
11-13 le45 @:)45 s 40489(0) P
Applicant Name: Application Title:
WELD(COUNTY) WELCO06-ROAD-CR 20.5 BETWEEN CR 5 AND CR 7
Period of Performance Start: Period of Performance End:
09-14-2013 03-14-2015
Subgrant Application - Entire Application
Application Title: WELCO06-ROAD-CR 20.5 BETWEEN CR 5 AND CR 7 � s v
Application Number: PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00489(0)
Application Type: Subgrant AppUIcalon(PW)
Preparer Information
Prefix Ms.
First Name KATHLEEN
Middle Initial
Last Name RUVARAC
Title TAG BRIDGE SPECIALIST
Agency/Organization Name FEMA- DHS
Address 1 9195 E. MINERAL AVE.
Address 2
City CENTENNIAL
State CO
Zip 80112
Email deanna.butterbaugh@state.co.us
Is the application preparer the Point of Contact? No
Point of Contact Information
Prefix
First Name Roy
Middle Initial
Last Name Rudisill
Title Director- OEM
Agency/Organization Weld County
Address 1 1150 O Street
Address 2 rudisill@weldgov.com
City Greeley
State CO
ZIP 80632
https://connect l.dhs.gov/ennnie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,S SL+dispatchDestination.do?... 2/19/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 2 of 16
Phone 970-304-6540
Fax
Email rrudisill@weld.gov.com
Alternate Point of Contact Information
Prefix
First Name
Middle Initial
Last Name
Title
Agency/Organization
Address 1
Address 2
City
State
ZIP
Phone
Fax
Email
Project Description
Disaster Number: 4145
Pre-Application Number: PA-08-CO-4145-RPA-0088
Applicant ID: 123-99123-00
Applicant Name: WELD (COUNTY)
Subdivision:
Project Number: WELCO06
Standard Project Number!Title: 399- Road System Damage
Please Indicate the Project Type: Neither Alternate nor Improved
Application Title: WELCO06- ROAD -CR 20.5 BETWEEN CR 5 AND CR 7
Category: C.ROADS& BRIDGES
Percentage Work Completed? 95.0 %
As of Date: 11-14-2013
Comments
Attachments
User Date Document Description Hard Copy File File Name Action
Type Reference
KATHLEEN 02-05- Map Location Map WELCO06 Location View
RUVARAC 2014 Map_CR20.pdf(133.35 kb)
KATHLEEN 02-05- Project Site
Photos Photos.pdf(112.17 kb) View
RUVARAC 2014 Photos
https://connect 1.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,S SL+dispatchDestination.do?... 2/19/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 3 of 16
Damage Facilities (Part 1 of 2)
Facility Site
Number Facility Name Address County City State ZIP Previously Action
Damaged?
1 CR 20.5 east of Boulder Creek Weld CO No
Comments
Attachments
Facility Name: CR 20.5 east of Boulder Creek
Address 1:
Address 2:
County: Weld
City:
State: CO
ZIP:
Was this site previously damaged? No
Percentage Work Completed? 95.00 %
PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00489(0):
CR 20.5 east of Boulder Creek
Location:
PA-06-CO-4145-PW-00489(0):
During the incident period of September 11, 2013 to September 30,
2013, Weld County, Colorado received heavy rainfall and debris in the
creeks, streams and rivers which caused damage to numerous roads
and bridges in Weld County. This project worksheet addresses damages
to CR 20.5 between CR 5 and CR 7, in Section 16, T2N, R68W.
On November 14, 2013, Kathleen Ruvarac, FEMA TAC Bridge
Specialist, David Ray, FEMA Hazard Mitigation Specialist, Gary Moore,
FEMA Environmental, Historical, Preservation Specialist, and Donald
Dunker,Weld County Public Works Engineer, performed a site
investigation at this location to document damages. The road was open
Damage Description and and repairs completed at the time of inspection.
Dimensions:
One asphalt patch on roadway measured 362 ft in length x 13 ft in width
=4,706 SF x 0.75 ft in depth = 3,529.50 CF x 146 LB/CF x 1 ton/2000 LB
= 257.7 TNS asphalt
A second asphalt patch on roadway measured 19 ft in length x 13 ft in
width x 0.75 ft in depth = 185.25 CF x 146 LB/CF x 1 ton/2000 LB = 13.5
TNS asphalt
Total: 271.2 TNS asphalt were validated with asphalt thickness of 9
inches.
Embankment Material lost in roadway void in the westbound travel lane
and on north shoulder measuring length ft in len th x 15 ft in width x 6 ft in
depth =1,206.7 CY and 19 ft in length x 15 ft in width x 6 ft in depth =
63.3 CY,totaling 1,270 CY.
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emmie/,DanaInfo=isource.fema.net,S SL+dispatchDestination.do?... 2/19/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 4 of 16
16 LF of 18" CMP washed away from the site and was not recovered.
The Applicant has provided pictures of the facility dated 9-16-2013
documenting damages. These photos are attached to this project
worksheet.
PA-08-CO-4145-P W-00489(0):
WORK COMPLETED
1)Contracts:
The applicant hired a contractor, Mountain Constructors, Inc., P.O. Box
405, Platteville, CO 80538 (970)786-6161. Invoice attached to project
worksheet for work performed 10-2 through 10-14, 2013=$86,984.48.
Original bid was$146,000 but Weld County reduced work to be
performed in contract(placing asphalt with Force account labor,
equipment and materials)because contractor could not complete work as
quickly as Weld County needed the work to be completed to open the
road.
Hauled and dumped with (975.07 CY) Rip—Rap in lieu of borrow material
to fill in roadway void in travel lane and shoulder embankment. It was
necessary to fill the void with larger stone in order to quickly facilitate
restoration of the facility under saturated soil flooding conditions. The
contractor invoiced the applicant for the rip rap stone as the same unit
price which was quoted in their bid of$30/CY for embankment(granular
fill).
Filled in roadway void in travel lane and shoulder embankment with
(606.76 TNS, 303.4 CY)Aggregate base course cost(placed and
compacted).
Total Fill Materials = 975.07 CY+ 303.4 CY= 1278.5 CY
The project specialist compared the repair cost for labor and construction
of similar roadway repairs with the bid and subsequent invoice received
from Mountain Constructors, Inc. for$86,984.48 and found the repair
estimate to be reasonable.
Scope of Work: The applicant hired an environmental consulting firm to prepare
application for ACOE Section 404 Nationwide permit, Tiglas Ecological
Services, 5015 Swainsona Drive, Loveland, CO 80537. Invoice attached
to project worksheet for work performed 9-29-2013 =$445.00
Total Contracts: $87,429.48
2) Force Account:
The applicant utilized force account labor, equipment and materials to
install(289.16 tons)of asphaltic material on roadway.
Labor-$6,706.73
Equipment-$5,476.88
Materials-$11,277.24 Asphalt Specialties
The project specialist compared the repair cost for construction of similar
CDOT roadway repairs with the Applicant's force account labor,
equipment and materials found the repair estimate to be reasonable.
CDOT Item Number 403-33741 Hot Bituminous Pavement(Grading S)
(75)(PG-64-22)= $81.70/ton x 289.16 TNS =$23,624.37 (In Place)
Compared with Force Account=$23,530.93 (Applicant installed asphalt
in excess of 9 inches deep within validated roadway ground area, 289.16
tons, Project specialist validated 271.2 tons of asphalt, quantity of
material validated within 10% and considered reasonable.)
Applicant utilized force account labor to install 16 LF of 18" CMP (CDOT
Item Number 603-10180 In place)x $48.49/LF =$775.84
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 2/19/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 5 of 16
Total Materials: $12,053.08
Project Notes
1. Following the September 2013 flooding, applicant used contract
services and/or force account resources to re-open roads/bridges and
repair damage as soon as possible. At several damage sites, repairs
appear to have returned the facility to its pre-disaster design, function
and capacity with no known remaining work to be completed. However
at other sites due to the onset of winter conditions, applicant was unable
to complete the restoration, thus leaving work to be completed. Finally,
at some sites, applicant has expressed concern that unanticipated work
may be still be required as a result of conditions beyond their control,
such as possible subsequent settlement resulting from saturated soil
conditions following the flood or where high water levels or
erosion/deposition prevented a complete damage assessment.
2. This PW addresses all validated flood related damages at the
specified site, including completed work and work to be completed(which
damages were known to the applicant and reported to FEMA by the
effective date of this PW). In the event that applicant identifies
subsequent, currently unknown flood related damage at such site,
applicant is advised to contact the State of Colorado Office of Emergency
Management to report the damage and request an inspection prior to its
repair. In the event that the State validates the damage as a direct result
of the September 2013 flooding,the State will request FEMA prepare a
version of this PW to address the eligible cost of repair.
3.Applicant has substantially completed the work but will not have cost
data available within the fourteen day Pocket Guide rule. Per Field
Operations Pocket Guide, Section 7, Cost Estimates, Page 26, "If the
applicant has not produced cost data within two weeks of the site
inspection,the Project Specialist will prepare the PW on the basis of an
estimate for the work accomplished". Applicant, CO State representative
and FEMA personnel jointly conducted all inspections and agreed to use
CDOT costs for in-place costs to derive estimates on this project
worksheet.Applicant understands that all actual support documentation,
invoices, FA records, contract and proof of payment will be required for
final reconciliation and or closeout process.
4. Pursuant to 44 CFR 13.42, Grantees and Subgrantees are required to
retain records, including source documentation,to support
expenditures/costs incurred against the grant award, for 3 years from the
date of submission to FEMA of the final Financial Status Report.
5. The applicant must obtain all required federal, state, and local permits
prior to the commencement of work.
6. The subgrantee is requesting direct administrative costs that are
directly chargeable to this specific project. Associated eligible work is
related to administration of the PA project only and in accordance with 44
CFR 13.22. These costs are treated consistently and uniformly as direct
costs in all federal awards and other subgrantee activities and are not
included in any approved indirect costs.
7. Project was reviewed for 406 Hazard Mitigation and a copy of 406
HMP proposal is attached with this project.
8. The applicant is aware that all projects are subject to an insurance
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,S S L+dispatchDestination.do?... 2/19/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 6 of 16
review as stated in 44 C.F.R. Sections 206.252 and 206.253. If
applicable, an insurance determination will be made either as anticipated
proceeds or actual proceeds in accordance with the applicant's insurance
policy that may affect the total amount of the project.
9. The applicant is required to adhere to State and Federal Government
Procurement rules and regulations and maintain adequate records to
support the basis for all purchasing of goods and materials and
contracting services for projects approved under the Public Assistance
program, as stated in 44 CFR 13.36. The applicant has advised they
have followed their normal procurement procedures.
Hazard Mitigation Plan is Attached
Hazard Mitigation Proposal
• Is effective mitigation feasible on this site? Yes
If you answered Yes to the above question, the next question is required
Will mitigation be performed on this site? Yes
If you answered Yes to the above question, the next question is required
Do you wish to attach a Hazard Mitigation Yes
Proposal?
If you answered Yes to the above question,the next two questions are required
406 Hazard Mitigation Plan
Work To Be Completed
The applicant has indicated that the installation of turf
reinforcement mat on the roadside shoulders and
embankment slopes will re-direct channel flow across the
slopes reducing erosion at the facility and alleviating future
damages.
1) Turf Reinforcement Mat—362 ft+ 19 ft= 381 ft in
length x 15 ft in width within the right of way= 635 SY x 1.2
factor for toe in excess of material= 762 SY x $10.00/SY
Please provide the Scope of Work for the (CDOT Avg. Unit Price furnished and installed)= $7,620.00
estimate: This HMP is considered cost effective per FEMA Disaster
(maximum 4000 characters) Assistance Policy 9526.1, Section VII. B. 2. Certain
mitigation measures (Appendix A), determined cost effective,
as long as the mitigation measure does not exceed 100% of
the eligible cost of the eligible repair work on the project.
Appendix A. 5. Gabion baskets, rip rap, sheet piling, and
geotextile fabric installation- installation to control erosion.
The net cost of mitigation/cost of damages is 7% < 100%.
This HMP is for cost estimating purposes only. The Final
design is the obligation of the Applicant and/or their agent.
Would you like to add the Hazard Mitigation No
Proposal as a cost line item to the project cost?
GIS Coordinates
Project Location Latitude Longitude
CR 20.5 east of Boulder Creek 40.13887 105.00048
between CR 5 and CR 7
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 2/19/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 7 of 16
Special Considerations
1. Does the damaged facility or item of work have insurance coverage and/or is it an insurable yes
risk(e.g., buildings, equipment, vehicles, etc)?
If you would like to make any comments, please enter them below.
(maximum 4000 characters)
On file at the JFO
2. Is the damaged facility located within a floodplain or coastal high hazard area and/or does it No
have an impact on a floodplain or wetland?
If you would like to make any comments, please enter them below.
(maximum 4000 characters)
Flood Map 08013C0300J
3. Is the damaged facility or item of work located within or adjacent to a Coastal Barrier No
Resource System Unit or an Otherwise Protected Area?
4. Will the proposed facility repairs/reconstruction change the pre-disaster conditions (e.g., No
footprint, material, location, capacity, use of function)?
5. Does the applicant have a hazard mitigation proposal or would the applicant like technical Yes
assistance for a hazard mitigation proposal?
If you would like to make any comments, please enter them below.
(maximum 4000 characters)
HMP Attached to Back Up
6. Is the damaged facility on the National Register of Historic Places or the state historic No
listing? Is it older than 50 years?Are there more, similar buildings near the site?
7.Are there any pristine or undisturbed areas on, or near, the project site?Are there large No
tracts of forestland?
8. Are there any hazardous materials at or adjacent to the damaged facility and/or item of No
work?
9. Are there any other environmental or controversial issues associated with the damaged Yes
facility and/or item of work?
If you would like to make any comments, please enter them below.
(maximum 4000 characters)
EHP Review will be conducted
Attachments
User Date Document Description Hard Copy File File Name Action
Type Reference
KATHLEEN 01-20- Firmette- WELCO06-Firmetle.pdf
BROWN 2014 Floodplain Map (369.83 kb) View
For Category C, D, E, F, and G Projects only
Is effective mitigation feasible on this project? Yes
If you answered Yes to the above question, the next question is required
Will mitigation be performed on any sites in this Yes
project?
If you answered Yes to the above question, the next question is required
Do you wish to attach a Hazard Mitigation Yes
Proposal?
If you answered Yes to the above question, the next two questions are required
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emmie/,DanaInfo=isource.fema.net,S SL+dispatchDestination.do?... 2/19/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 8 of 16
02/07/14-Brian W. Drost, 406 Specialist- Revised HMP:
406 Hazard Mitigation Plan Work To Be Completed The
applicant has indicated that the installation of turf
reinforcement mat on the roadside shoulders and
embankment slopes will re-direct channel flow across the
slopes reducing erosion at the facility and alleviating future
damages. 1)Turf Reinforcement Mat—362 ft+ 19 ft = 381 ft
in length x 15 ft in width within the right of way=635 SY x
1.2 factor for toe in excess of material = 762 SY x$10.00/SY
Pleaseprovide the Scope of Work
(CDOT Avg. Unit Price furnished and installed)= $7,620.00
for the estimate: This HMP is considered cost effective per FEMA Disaster
Assistance Policy 9526.1, Section VII. B. 1. Certain
mitigation measures (Appendix A), determined cost effective,
as long as the mitigation measure does not exceed 15%of
the eligible cost of the eligible repair work on the project. The
net cost of mitigation/cost of damages is 6.82% ($7,620/
$111,666.20). This HMP is for cost estimating purposes
only.The Final design is the obligation of the Applicant
and/or their agent.
Would you like to add the Hazard Mitigation Yes
Proposal as a cost line item to the project cost?
Hazard Mitigation Proposal-0909
# Code Material and/or Description Unit Unit of Unit Price Subgrant Type Cost Estimate Action
Quantity Measure Budget Class
***Version 0***
1 9999 I Turf reinforcement mat 762 SY I $ 10.00 $ 7,620.00
Total Cost: $ 7,620.00
Comments
Attachments
User Date Document Description Hard Copy File File Name Action
Type Reference
KATHLEEN 02-05- Mitigation Weld County CAT C CR 20.5 East
RUVARAC 2014 Proposal of Boulder Creek_HMP.pdf(59.35 View
kb)
Cost Estimate
Is this Project Worksheet for
(Preferred) Repair
Sequence Code Material and/or Unit Unit of Unit Price Subgrant Type Cost Action
Description Quantity Measure Budget Class Estimate
***Version 0***
Other
1 0000 Work Completed Other $ 0.00
2 9003 Contract Costs 1 LS 87,429.48 CONTRACTUAL Other $ 87,429.48
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,S SL+dispatchD estination.do?... 2/19/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 9 of 16
3 9007 Labor 1 LS 6,706.76 PERSONNEL Other $ 6,706.76
4 9008 Equipment 1 LS 5,476.88 EQUIPMENT Other $ 5,476.88
5 9009 Material 1 LS 12,053.08 SUPPLIES Other $ 12,053.08
6 0000 Work to be Completed Other $ 0.00
Direct
7 9901 Administrative 1 LS $ INDIRECT Other $ 1,000.00
Costs 1,000.00 CHARGES
(Subgrantee)
Total Cost : $ 112,666.20
Insurance Adjustments (Deductibles, Proceeds and Settlements)- 5900/5901
Subgrant
Sequence Code Material and/or Unit Unit of Unit Budget Type Cost Action
Description Quantity Measure Price Class Estimate
Total Cost : $0.00
Hazard Mitigation Proposal -0909
Subgrant
Sequence Code Material and/or Unit Unit of Unit Budget Type Cost Action
Description Quantity Measure Price Class Estimate
***Version 0***
1 9999 Turf reinforcement mat 762 I SY $ 10.001 $7,620.00
Total Cost : $ 7,620.00
Total Cost Estimate: $ 120 266.20
(Preferred Estimate Type+ Insurance Adjustments+ Hazard Mitigation Proposal)
Comments
Attachments
User Date Document Description Hard Copy File File Name Action
Type Reference
KATHLEEN 02-05- WELCO06 Cost Est. Section
RUVARAC 2014 Invoice-Contract Materials.pdf View
(1.61 Mb)
KATHLEEN 02-05- WELCO06 Contract View
RUVARAC 2014 Provisions .pdf(1.98 Mb)
KATHLEEN 02-05- WELCO06 Force Account DAC- View
RUVARAC 2014 Estimate.pdf(221.82 kb)
Existing Insurance Information
Insurance Type Policy No. Bldg/Property Content Insurance Deductible Years
Amount Amount Amount Amount Required
I I
https://connect 1.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 2/19/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 10 of 16
Comments
On file at JFO
Attachments
Comments and Attachments
Name of Section Comment Attachment
Project Description WELCO06_Location Map_CR20.pdf
Photos.pdf
Special Considerations WELCO06 - Firmette.pdf
Mitigation Weld County CAT C CR 20.5 East of Boulder Creek_HMP.pdf
WELCO06 Cost Est. Section Invoice -Contract Materials.pdf
Cost Estimate WELCO06 Contract Provisions .pdf
WELCO06 Force Account DAC- Estimate.pdf
Insurance Information On file at JFO
Form 90-91 WELCO06_DDD_SOW.pdf
Application Level Procurement Policy in Effect til Jan 7 2014.pdf
Bid documents Bridge 20.5-WCR 5 to 7.pdf
Bundle Reference#(Amendment#) Date Awarded
PA-08-CO-4145-State-0031(30) 02-14-2014
Subgrant Application - FEMA Form 90-91
Note:The Effective Cost Share for this application is 75%
FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
PROJECT WORKSHEET
DISASTER PROJECT NO. PA ID NO. DATE CATEGORY
WELCO06 123-99123- 02-06-2014 C
FEMA 4145 - DR -CO 00
APPLICANT:WELD(COUNTY) WORK COMPLETE AS OF:
11-14-2013:95%
Site 1 of 1
DAMAGED FACILITY:
COUNTY: Weld
CR 20.5 east of Boulder Creek
LOCATION: LATITUDE: LONGITUDE:
40.13887 -105.00048
PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00489(0):
CR 20.5 east of Boulder Creek
DAMAGE DESCRIPTION AND DIMENSIONS:
PA-08-CO-4145-P W-00489(0):
During the incident period of September 11,2013 to September 30,2013,Weld County,Colorado received heavy rainfall and debris in the
creeks,streams and rivers which caused damage to numerous roads and bridges in Weld County. This project worksheet addresses
damages to CR 20.5 between CR 5 and CR 7,in Section 16,T2N,R68W.
https://connectl.dhs.gov/emrnie/,DanaInfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 2/19/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 11 of 16
On November 14,2013,Kathleen Ruvarac,FEMA TAC Bridge Specialist,David Ray,FEMA Hazard Mitigation Specialist,Gary Moore,
FEMA Environmental,Historical,Preservation Specialist,and Donald Dunker,Weld County Public Works Engineer,performed a site
investigation at this location to document damages. The road was open and repairs completed at the time of inspection.
One asphalt patch on roadway measured 362 ft in length x 13 ft in width=4,706 SF x 0.75 ft in depth=3,529.50 CF x 146 LB/CF x 1
ton/2000 LB=257.7 TNS asphalt
A second asphalt path on roadway measured 19 ft in length x 13 ft in width x 0.75 ft in depth= 185.25 CF x 146 LB/CF x 1 ton/2000 LB=
13.5 TNS asphalt
Total:271.2 TNS asphalt were validated with asphalt thickness of 9 inches.
Embankment Material lost in roadway void in the westbound travel lane and on north shoulder measuring 362 ft in length x 15 ft in width x 6
ft in depth=1,206.7 CY and 19 ft in length x 15 ft in width x 6 ft in depth=63.3 CY,totaling 1,270 CY.
16 LF of 18"CMP washed away from the site and was not recovered.
The Applicant has provided pictures of the facility dated 9-16-2013 documenting damages. These photos are attached to this project
worksheet.
SCOPE OF WORK:
PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00489(0):
WORK COMPLETED
1)Contracts:
The applicant hired a contractor,Mountain Constructors,Inc.,P.O.Box 405,Platteville,CO 80538(970)786-6161. Invoice attached to
project worksheet for work performed 10-2 through 10-14,2013=$86,984.48.
Original bid was$146,000 but Weld County reduced work to be performed in contract(placing asphalt with Force account labor,equipment
and materials)because contractor could not complete work as quickly as Weld County needed the work to be completed to open the road.
Hauled and dumped with(975.07 CY)Rip—Rap in lieu of borrow material to fill in roadway void in travel lane and shoulder embankment. It
was necessary to fill the void with larger stone in order to quickly facilitate restoration of the facility under saturated soil flooding conditions.
The contractor invoiced the applicant for the rip rap stone as the same unit price which was quoted in their bid of$30/CY for embankment
(granular fill).
Filled in roadway void in travel lane and shoulder embankment with(606.76 TNS,303.4 CY)Aggregate base course cost(placed and
compacted).
Total Fill Materials=975.07 CY+303.4 CY=1278.5 CY
The project specialist compared the repair cost for labor and construction of similar roadway repairs with the bid and subsequent invoice
received from Mountain Constructors,Inc.for$86,984.48 and found the repair estimate to be reasonable.
The applicant hired an environmental consulting firm to prepare application for ACOE Section 404 Nationwide permit,Tiglas Ecological
Services,5015 Swainsona Drive,Loveland,CO 80537. Invoice attached to project worksheet for work performed 9-29-2013=$445.00
Total Contracts:$87,429.48
2)Force Account:
The applicant utilized force account labor,equipment and materials to install(289.16 tons)of asphaltic material on roadway.
Labor-$6,706.73
Equipment-$5,476.88
Materials-$11,277.24 Asphalt Specialties
The project specialist compared the repair cost for construction of similar CDOT roadway repairs with the Applicant's force account labor,
equipment and materials found the repair estimate to be reasonable.CDOT Item Number 403-33741 Hot Bituminous Pavement(Grading S)
(75)(PG-64-22)=$81.70/ton x 289.16 TNS=$23,624.37(In Place)
Compared with Force Account=$23,530.93(Applicant installed asphalt in excess of 9 inches deep within validated roadway ground area,
289.16 tons,Project specialist validated 271.2 tons of asphalt,quantity of material validated within 10%and considered reasonable.)
Applicant utilized force account labor to install 16 LF of 18"CMP(CDOT Item Number 603-10180 In place)x$48.49/LF=$775.84
Total Materials:$12,053.08
Project Notes
1. Following the September 2013 flooding,applicant used contract services and/or force account resources to re-open roads/bridges and
repair damage as soon as possible. At several damage sits,repairs appear to have returned the facility to its pre-disaster design,function
and capacity with no known remaining work to be completed. However at other sites due to the onset of winter conditions,applicant was
unable to complete the restoration,thus leaving work to be completed. Finally,at some sites,applicant has expressed concern that
unanticipated work may be still be required as a result of conditions beyond their control,such as possible subsequent settlement resulting
from saturated soil conditions following the flood or where high water levels or erosion/deposition prevented a complete damage
assessment.
2. This PW addresses all validated flood related damages at the specified site,including completed work and work to be completed(which
damages were known to the applicant and reported to FEMA by the effective date of this PW). In the event that applicant identifies
subsequent,currently unknown flood related damage at such site,applicant is advised to contact the State of Colorado Office of Emergency
Management to report the damage and request an inspection prior to its repair. In the event that the State validates the damage as a direct
result of the September 2013 flooding,the State will request FEMA prepare a version of this PW to address the eligible cost of repair.
3.Applicant has substantially completed the work but will not have cost data available within the fourteen day Pocket Guide rule.Per Field
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emmie/,DanaInfo=isource.fema.net,S SL+dispatchDestination.do?... 2/19/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 12 of 16
Operations Pocket Guide,Section 7,Cost Estimates,Page 26,"If the applicant has not produced cost data within two weeks of the site
inspection,the Project Specialist will prepare the PW on the basis of an estimate for the work accomplished".Applicant,CO State
representative and FEMA personnel jointly conducted all inspections and agreed to use CDOT costs for in-place costs to derive estimates
on this project worksheet.Applicant understands that all actual support documentation,invoices,FA records,contract and proof of payment
will be required for final reconciliation and or closeout process.
4.Pursuant to 44 CFR 13.42,Grantees and Subgrantees are required to retain records,including source documentation,to support
expenditures/costs incurred against the grant award,for 3 years from the date of submission to FEMA of the final Financial Status Report.
5.The applicant must obtain all required federal,state,and local permits prior to the commencement of work.
6.The subgrantee is requesting direct administrative costs that are directly chargeable to this specific project. Associated eligible work is
related to administration of the PA project only and in accordance with 44 CFR 13.22. These costs are treated consistently and uniformly as
direct costs in all federal awards and other subgrantee activities and are not included in any approved indirect costs.
7.Project was reviewed for 406 Hazard Mitigation and a copy of 406 HMP proposal is attached with this project
8.The applicant is aware that all projects are subject to an insurance review as stated in 44 C.F.R.Sections 206.252 and 206.253.If
applicable,an insurance determination will be made either as antidpated proceeds or actual proceeds in accordance with the applicant's
insurance policy that may affect the total amount of the project.
9.The applicant is required to adhere to State and Federal Government Procurement rules and regulations and maintain adequate records
to support the basis for all purchasing of goods and materials and contracting services for projects approved under the Public Assistance
program,as stated in 44 CFR 13.36.The applicant has advised they have followed their normal procurement procedures.
Hazard Mitigation Plan is Attached
Does the Scope of Work change the pre-disaster
conditions at the site? Yes No Special Considerations included? Yes No
Hazard Mitigation proposal included? Yes
Is there insurance coverage on this facility? Yes No
No
PROJECT COST
ITEM CODE NARRATIVE QUANTITY/UNIT UNIT PRICE COST
' Version 0'
Other
1 0000 Work Completed 0/LS $0.00 $0.00
2 9003 Contract Costs 1/LS $87,429.48 $87,429.48
3 9007 Labor 1/LS $ 6,706.76 $6,706.76
4 9008 Equipment 1/LS $ 5,476.88 $ 5,476.88
5 9009 Material 1/LS $ 12,053.08 $ 12,053.08
6 0000 Work to be Completed 0/LS $ 0.00 $ 0.00
7 9901 Direct Administrative Costs 1/LS $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00
(Subgrantee)
8 0909 Hazard Mitigation Proposal 1/LS $ 7,620.00 $7,620.00
TOTAL COST $ 120,286.20
• PREPARED BY KATHLEEN RUVARAC TITLE TAC BRIDGE SPECIALIST SIGNATURE
APPLICANT REP.Roy Rudisill TITLE Director-OEM SIGNATURE
WELD (COUNTY) : PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00489
Conditions Information
Review Name Condition Type Condition Name Description Monitored Status
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,S SL+dispatchDestination.do?... 2/19/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 13 of 16
This review does not address
all federal, state and local
requirements. Acceptance of
federal funding requires
Standard recipient to comply with all
Final Review Other(EHP) Condition#2 federal, state and local laws. No Approved
Failure to obtain all
appropriate federal, state and
local environmental permits
and clearances may
jeopardize federal funding.
Any change to the approved
Standard scope of work will require re-
Final Review Other(EHP) Condition#1 evaluation for compliance No Approved
with NEPA and other Laws
and Executive Orders.
The applicant must
coordinate with the local
Final Review Other(EHP) NEPA Condition floodplain manager to obtain No Approved
and comply with appropriate
floodplain management
permits.
Gravel/borrow materials for
work to be completed must
be obtained from one of the
National Historic following pre-approved
Final Review Other(EHP) Preservation Act sources: (SHPO approved No Approved
(NHPA) source, CO Licensed Pit,
commercial source,
contractor or county
Stockpiles).
Applicant is responsible for
Executive Order coordinating with the local
floodplain manager. All
Final Review Other(EHP) 11988- required permits should be No Approved
Floodplains maintained as part of the
permanent record.
Applicant shall,to the extent
Final Review Other(EHP) Endangered possible, adhere to the No Approved
Species Act(ESA) attached conservation
measures.
If ground disturbing activities
occur during construction,
applicant will monitor ground
Standard disturbance and if any
Final Review Other(EHP) Condition#3 potential archeological No Approved
resources are discovered,will
immediately cease
construction in that area and
notify the State and FEMA.
This review does not address
all federal, state and local
Standard requirements.Acceptance of
EHP Review Other(EHP) Condition#2 federal funding requires No Recommended
recipient to comply with all
federal, state and local laws.
Failure to obtain all
https://connectl.dhs.gov/ertnnie/,DanaInfo=isource.fema.net,S SL+dispatchDestination.do?... 2/19/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 14 of 16
appropriate federal, state and
local environmental permits
and clearances may
jeopardize federal funding.
Any change to the approved
Standard scope of work will require re-
EHP Review Other(EHP) Condition#1 evaluation for compliance No Recommended
with NEPA and other Laws
and Executive Orders.
The applicant must
coordinate with the local
EHP Review Other(EHP) NEPA Condition floodplain manager to obtain No Recommended
and comply with appropriate
floodplain management
permits.
Gravel/borrow materials for
work to be completed must
be obtained from one of the
National Historic following pre-approved
EHP Review Other(EHP) Preservation Act sources: (SHPO approved No Recommended
(NHPA) source, CO Licensed Pit,
commercial source,
contractor or county
Stockpiles).
Applicant is responsible for
Executive Order coordinating with the local
floodplain manager.All
EHP Review Other(EHP) 11988- No Recommended
required permits should be
Floodplains maintained as part of the
permanent record.
Applicant shall,to the extent
EHP Review Other(EHP) Endangered possible, adhere to the No Recommended
Species Act(ESA) attached conservation
measures.
If ground disturbing activities
occur during construction,
applicant will monitor ground
Standard disturbance and if any
EHP Review Other(EHP) Condition#3 potential archeological No Recommended
resources are discovered,will
immediately cease
construction in that area and
notify the State and FEMA.
Internal Comments
No. Queue User Date/Time Reviewer Comments
02-14-2014
Award
6 Review SYSTEM 03:47 PM ACCEPTED
GMT
Award PEVAN 02-14-2014
5 Review RONALD 02:58 PM Approved
GMT
Note:Applicant has substantially completed the work but will
not have cost data available within the fourteen day Pocket
Guide rule. Final Reviewer finds eligible the application and
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emmie/,DanaInfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 2/19/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 15 of 16
approves the funding of this CAT-C project worksheet based
on the applicant having performed all required procurement
Final PALACIO 02-12-2014 procedures, perform all required special considerations
4 Review JOSE 03:43 PM recommendations such as permits to address EHP
GMT considerations and securing all actual cost documentation for
the financial reconciliation of this project. Task Force Leader-
J.Palacio 02/12/2014
Category C, 95%complete,Weld County. The applicant used
contract and force account labor to fill in a damaged roadway
and shoulder embankment with rip rap, aggregate base, and
asphalt and replaced an 18" corrugated metal culvert running
under the road.
Mitigation: The applicant will install a turf reinforcement mat on
the road shoulder embankment to reduce future erosion.
-dsharon-02/10/2014 16:42:19 GMT
The Denver regulatory office is requiring that an emergency
permit be obtained for all flood recovery work that takes place
in Waters of the US. -dsharon -02/10/2014 20:57:26 GMT
Project site work is in mapped wetlands. Per 44 CFR Part 9.5
(g)Step 1: Project repairs are determined to have no effect on
floodplain or wetlands provided that the repairs remain in the
existing footprint and do not impact previously undisturbed
areas. No further wetlands or floodplains review is required.
Project has no potential to impact the wetland function or
EHP PATTERSON 02-10-2014 resources and substantially restores site to pre-disaster
3 Review MOLLY 08:59 PM condition. No further wetland review is required under the 8-
GMT step process. -dsharon-02/10/2014 16:40:11 GMT
Entire community will benefit from project completion. -
dsharon -02/10/2014 16:40:30 GMT
Threatened and Endangered Species occur in this county but
the type of activity proposed on this Project Worksheet has
been determined to have "no effect"on this species. -
dsharon-02/10/2014 16:34:28 GMT
Please add CWA comment
Project is located in Zone A, FIRM panel 0802660850C dated
September 28th 1982. Per 44 CFR Part 9.5(g)Step 1: Project
repairs are determined to have no effect on floodplain or
wetlands provided that the repairs remain in the existing
footprint and do not impact previously undisturbed areas. No
further floodplain review is required. -dsharon-02/10/2014
16:39:15 GMT
The scope of work has been reviewed and meets the criteria
of the 2013 signed Programmatic Agreement, Item III;
Sections A and G agreed to by FEMA and the SHPO. -
dsharon-02/10/2014 16:33:12 GMT
A review of the documentation provided has identified that
Weld County is insured for property damages through;
Colorado Counties Casualty and Property Pool, Policy Number
020412751.
This policy does not provide coverage for dams, dikes,
Insurance JOHNSON 02-07-2014 bridges, culverts, roadways, streets, walks, paved surfaces,
2 Review KENNETH 10:07 PM tunnels, canals, land.
GMT The insurance policy will not provide coverage for costs
identified in this PW
There will not an insurance reduction for this PW.
The FEMA eligible damages are not to building, contents,
equipment, or vehicles;therefore,there will not be an
insurance commitment required.
https://connectl.dhs.gov/emmie/,DanaInfo=isource.fema.net,S SL+dispatchDestination.do?... 2/19/2014
L _
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 16 of 16
02-07-2014
Mitigation DROST The Hazard Mitigation Proposal is approved-Brian W. Drost,
1 Review BRIAN GMT PM 406 Specialist
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emmie/,DanaInfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 2/19/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page I of 33
iir
r Pt-0B-¢0-4145-PW-00561(0) P
Applicant Name: Application Title:
WELD(COUNTY) WELCO08-Various County Roads-Gravel and Paved
Period of Performance Start: Period of Performance End:
09-14-2013 03-14-2015
Subgrant Application - Entire Application
Application Title: WEL0O08-Various County Roads-Gravel and Paved
Application Number: PA-os-co-4145-Pw-00561(0)
Application Type: sudgrant Application(Pw)
Preparer Information
Prefix
First Name Paul
Middle Initial
Last Name Hesse
Title TAC Project Specialist
Agency/Organization Name FEMA-DHS
Address 1 9200 East Mineral Ave
Address 2
City Centennial
State CO
Zip 80112
Email deanna.butterbaugh@state.co.us
Is the application preparer the Point of Contact? No
Point of Contact Information
Prefix
First Name Roy
Middle Initial
Last Name Rudisill
Title Director-OEM
Agency/Organization Weld County
Address 1 1150 O Street
Address 2 rrudisill@weldgov.com
City Greeley
State CO
ZIP 80632
Phone 970-304-6540
Fax
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,S SL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 2 of 33
Email rrudisill@weldgov.com
Alternate Point of Contact Information
Prefix
First Name Trevor
Middle Initial
Last Name Jinicek
Title Director
Agency/Organization Weld County
Address 1 1150 O Street
Address 2
City Greeley
State CO
ZIP 80632
Phone 970-356-4000
Fax
Email tjinicek@weldgov.com
Project Description
Disaster Number: 4145
Pre-Application Number: PA-08-CO-4145-RPA-0088
Applicant ID: 123-99123-00
Applicant Name: WELD (COUNTY)
Subdivision:
Project Number: WELCO08
Standard Project Number/Title: 399-Road System Damage
Please Indicate the Project Type: Neither Alternate nor Improved
Application Title: WELCO08-Various County Roads-Gravel and Paved
Category: C.ROADS&BRIDGES
Percentage Work Completed? 95.0%
As of Date: 01-23-2014
Comments
The applicant must notify the state if there are any changes in the scope of work prior to starting the repairs. Failure to
notify the State Division of Emergency Management may jeopardize receipt of federal funds.
Attachments
Damage Facilities(Part 1 of 2)
Site
Facility Facility Name Address County City State ZIP Previously Action
Number
Damaged?
1 Various County Roads-Gravel and 1150 O Weld Greeley CO 80632 No
Paved Street
Comments
Attachments
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 3 of 33
User Date Document Description Hard Copy File File Name Action
Type Reference
PAUL 02-04- Location Maps- PW#WELCO08 Location
HESSE 2014 Map Part 1 Maps_Partl.pdf(3.82 Mb) View
PAUL 02-09- Location Maps- PW#WELCO08 Location
HESSE 2014 Map Part 2 Maps_Part2.1.pdf(3.28 Mb) View
PAUL 02-09- Photos Photos PW WELCO08 Photos.1.pdf(666.94 View
HESSE 2014
Facility Name: Various County Roads-Gravel and Paved
Address 1: 1150 O Street
Address 2:
County: Weld
City: Greeley
State: CO
ZIP: 80632
Was this site previously damaged? No
Percentage Work Completed? 95.00
PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00561(0):
Various County Roads shown below as Locations 1 through 21. Each
Location: location has a GPS listed for the damaged area.
Damage Description and Dimensions: PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00561(0):
During the incident period of September 11, 2013 through September 30,
2013, the declared severe storms caused flooding, landslides and mudslides
throughout Weld County in Colorado. The gravel roads sustained damages
from overtopping of roads, high water levels in drainage ditches and
overloaded culverts. Damages commonly consisted of shoulder and
embankment erosion,washout of road base and aggregate surfacing. This
PW describes 21 damaged road locations. Total damages at the 21 locations
include total aggregate loss of 7499.14 Tons and asphalt pavement loss of
186 Tons. Damages to culverts and bridges are covered under separate
PWs. [Refer to Scope Notes 10 and 11 for cost and conversion factors.]
Location#1 Road EM-110-27-.5
Begin GPS:40.78342,-104.80159 End GPS:40.78334,-104.80379
Floodmap#0802660175C [Panel not printed]
Dimension: Road: 585LF x 22FT wide x 0.33FT deep/27= 157CY x 1.82=
287T
Embankment: (1.5FT wide x 1.5FT deep/2)x 2 sides x 585FT long/27=
49CY x 1.82 =89T
Damage: Road surface and embankment erosion [both sides]caused
aggregate loss of 376T. No damage to CMP.
Location#2 Road EM-27-110-.8
Begin GPS:40.80214,-104.81049 End GPS:40.80310,-104.81047
Floodmap#0802660175C [Panel not printed]
Dimension: Road:340LF x 22FT wide x 0.33FT deep/27=91 CY x 1.82=
167T
Embankment: (1.5FT wide x 3FT deep/2)x 2 sides x 340FT long/27=57CY
x 1.82= 103T
Damage: Road surface and embankment erosion [both sides]caused
https://connect I.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 4 of 33
aggregate loss of 270T. No damage to CMP.
Location#3 Road EM-108-27-.5
Begin GPS:40.76863,-104.79212 End GPS:40.76863,-104.79316
Floodmap#0802660175C [Panel not printed]
Dimension: Road:275LF x 22FT wide x 0.33FT deep/27= 74CY x 1.82=
135T
Embankment: (2FT wide x 1.53FT deep/2)x 2 sides x 275FT long/27=
31CY x 1.82 =55T
Damage: Road surface and embankment erosion[both sides]caused
aggregate loss of 190T. No damage to CMP.
Location#4 Road EM-94-43-.0
Begin GPS:40.66800,-104.65839 End GPS:40.66768,-104.65836
Floodmap#0802660350C [Panel not printed]
Dimension: Road: 100LF x 6FT wide x 0.67FT deep/27= 15CY x 1.82=27T
Embankment: (3.5FT wide x 2FT deep/2)x 1 side x 115FT long/27= 15CY x
1.82=27T
Damage: Road surface and embankment erosion [1 side]caused aggregate
loss of 54T. No damage to CMP.
Location#5 Road EM-90-15-.1 [9 locations through 90-19-3.3 approximately
150LF each total 1350LF at the following locations: 90-15-.1, 90-15-.5, 90-
15-.7,90-15-.8,90-15-.9,90-15-1.1,90-15-1.5,90-19-3.1,and 90-15-3.3]
Begin GPS:40.63944,-104.91761 End GPS:40.63954,-104.82288
Floodmap#0802660325C Dated 9/28/82[not in floodplain]
Dimension: Road: 1350LF x 24FT wide x 0.33FT deep/27=396CY x 1.82=
722T
Embankment: (2FT wide x 3FT deep/2)x 1 side x 1350FT long/27= 150CY
x 1.82=273T
Damage: Road surface and embankment erosion [1 side]caused aggregate
loss of 995T
Location#6 Road EM-15-90-.5[6 locations through 15-90-2.8 approximately
150LF each total 900LF at the following locations: 15-90-.5, 15-90-.8, 15-
90-1.6, 15-90-2.1, 15-90-2.5, and 15-90-2.8]
Begin GPS:40.66952,-104.92444 End GPS:40.67924,-104.92428
Floodmap#0802660325C dated 9/28/82 [not in floodplain]
Dimension: Road: 900LF x 24FT wide x 0.33FT deep/27=264CY x 1.82=
481T
Embankment: (3FT wide x 3FT deep/2)x 1 side x 900FT long/27= 150CY x
1.82 =273T
Damage: Road surface and embankment erosion [2 sides]caused
aggregate loss of 754T
Location#7 Road EM-61-76-.0(.1)
Begin GPS:40.5425,-104.48934 End GPS:40.54170,-104.48931
Floodmap#080266052C[Panel not printed]
Dimension: Road:280LF x 24FT wide x 0.35FT deep/27=87CY x 1.82=
159T
Embankment: (1.5FT wide x 2FT deep/2)x 1 side x 280FT long/27= 16CY x
1.82=28T
Damage: Road surface and embankment erosion [1 side]caused aggregate
loss of 187T
Location#8 Road EM-71-80-2.1
Begin GPS:40.59829,-104.3941 End GPS:40.59962,-104.39398
Floodmap#0802660525C [Panel not printed]
Dimension: Road:200LF x 24FT wide x 0.25FT deep/27=44CY x 1.82=
81T
Embankment: (3FT wide x 2FT deep/2)x 1 side x 470FT long/27=52CY x
1.82=95T
Embankment: (1.5FT wide x 1.5FT deep/2)x 1 side x 470FT long/27=20CY
https://connect 1.dhs.gov/emm ie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 5 of 33
x 1.82 =36T
Damage: Road surface and embankment erosion [2 sides]caused
aggregate loss of 212T
Location#9 Road EM-74-392-2.1
Begin GPS:40.52289,-104.37213 End GPS:40.52291,-104.37007
Floodmap#0802660525C [Panel not printed]
Dimension: Embankment: (2.5FT wide x 2FT deep/2)x 1 side x 550FT
long/27=51 CY x 1.82=93T
Damage: Road embankment erosion [1 side]caused aggregate loss of 93T
Location#10 Road EM-68-69-2.1
Begin GPS:40.47926,-104.37498 End GPS:40.47928,-104.37396
Floodmap#0802660675C dated 9/28/82[not in floodplain]
Dimension: Road:275LF x 25FT wide x 0.6FT deep/27= 153CY x 1.82=
279T
Embankment: (1 FT wide x 1 FT deep/2)x 1 side x 275FT long/27=5CY x
1.82 =9T
Magnesium Chloride: 275LF x 1 gal/LF=275 gal.
Damage: Road surface and embankment erosion [1 side]caused aggregate
loss of 288T
Location#11 Road EM-72-31-.4
Begin GPS:40.51011,-104.76512 End GPS:40.51013,-104.76553
Floodmap#0802660475D dated 9/22/99[not in floodplain]
Dimension: Road: 110LF x 24FT wide x 0.5FT deep/27=49CY x 1.82=89T
Embankment: (1 FT wide x 1 FT deep/2)x 2 sides x 110FT long/27=4CY x
1.82 =7T
Damage: Road surface and embankment erosion [2 sides]caused
aggregate loss of 96T
Location#12 Road EM-51-58-.5
Begin GPS:40.41366,-104.58353 End GPS:40.41467,-104.58355
Floodmap#0802660645C dated 9/28/82[not in floodplain]
Dimension: Road: 100LF x 6FT wide x 3FT deep/27=67CY x 1.82= 122T
Embankment: (3FT wide x 3FT deep/2)x 1 side x 312FT long/27=52CY x
1.82 =95T
Damage: Road surface and embankment erosion [1 side]caused aggregate
loss of 217T
Location#13 Road EM-45-54.5-.2
Note: According to the Weld County consultant[Base Tactical]EM-45-
54.5-.2 covers cleaning of the ditch just south of Hwy 34 on CR 45. This
work is incidental to the culvert repair where this ditch goes under CR45.
Therefore,this work is not covered under this PW but is covered under the
Weld County Culverts PW#WELCO35.
Location#14 Road Em-43-54-.2[Road repaired by Oil Company]
Begin GPS:40.38126, -104.65891 Mid GPS:40.38472,-104.65888
End GPS:40.38678,-104.65834
Floodmap#0802660639C dated 9/28/82 Floodplain Zone A4
Dimension: Road: 1960LF x 18FT wide/9=3920SY
Damage: Road surface and embankment erosion both sides caused
aggregate loss. Applicant indicated that Oil Company repaired road and
embankment at the Oil Company's cost. No material cost incurred by
Applicant only labor and equipment for supervision and grading.
Location#15 Road EM-388-53-.25[Paved]
Begin GPS:40.41037,-104.54981 End GPS:40.41370,-104.55771
Floodmap#0802660645C dated 9/28/82 Floodplain Zone A
Dimension: Road[asphalt]:42LF x 16FT wide x 0.58FT deep/27= 14CY x
1.97=28T
Shoulder: (1 FT wide x 0.17FT deep)x 2 sides x 726FT long/27=9.1 CY x
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 6 of 33
1.82= 16T
Damage: Road surface[asphalt—281]and shoulder erosion [2 sides—
approximately 30%within the GPS limits 2420 x 0.3=726LF]caused
aggregate loss of 16T.
Location#16 Road EM-52-US85-.0 is a paved road that had shoulder
damages. This location is split up into 4 areas as shown below. There was
no damage to the pavement.
Location#16.1 Road EM-52-US85-.0[Paved]
Begin GPS:40.35999,-104.6959 End GPS:40.36147,-104.68857
Floodmap#0802660638C dated 9/28/82 Floodplain Zone A7
Dimension: Shoulder: (2FT wide x 0.33FT deep)x 2 sides x 1221 FT long/27
=60CY x 1.82= 109T
Damage: Shoulder erosion [2 sides—approximately 60%within the GPS
limits 2035LF x 0.6= 1221LF]caused aggregate loss of 109T. No damage to
pavement.
Location#16.2 Road EM-52-US85-.0[Paved]
GPS:40.36309,-104.65900[southwest corner CR43 intersection]
Floodmap#0802660639C dated 9/28/82[not in floodplain]
Dimension: Shoulder: (2FT wide x 0.33FT deep)x 1 side x 40FT long/27=
1 CY x 1.82 = 1.82T
Damage: Shoulder erosion [1 side—40LF]caused aggregate loss of 1.82T.
No damage to pavement.
Location#16.3 Road EM-52-US85-.0[Paved]
GPS:40.36303,-104.67770[southwest corner CR41 intersection]
Floodmap#0802660638C dated 9/28/82 Floodplain Zone A7
Dimension: Shoulder: (2FT wide x 0.33FT deep)x 1 side x 40FT long/27=
1CY x 1.82= 1.82T
Damage: Shoulder erosion [1 side—40LF]caused aggregate loss of 1.82T.
No damage to pavement.
Location#16.4 Road EM-52-US85-.0[Paved]
GPS:40.36303,-104.67770[extending 100LF west on north side of road at
CR41 intersection]
Floodmap#0802660638C dated 9/28/82 Floodplain Zone A7
Dimension: Shoulder: (2FT wide x 0.33FT deep)x 1 side x 100FT long/27=
2.4CY x 1.82=4.5T
Damage: Shoulder erosion[1 side—100LF]caused aggregate loss of 4.5T.
No damage to pavement.
Location#17 Road EM-Brantner-35th [Paved]
Note: Within the GPS limits shown below,there are seven [7]areas of
damage indicated as 17.1 - 17.7.
Begin GPS:40.36650,-104.70034 End GPS:40.36526,-104.70184[Note:
This end point coincides with the beginning of City of Evans work covered
under a separate PW Ref#EVANS09 EMMIE#00302,therefore there is no
apparent overlap of work being claimed.]
Floodmap#0801820001B dated 4/2/79 Floodplain Zone A7 and Zone B
Floodmap#0802660638C dated 9/28/82 Floodplain Zone A7 and Zone B
Location#17.1 Embankment southeast side of roadway
Dimension: Embankment: (8FT wide x 5.5FT deep/2)x 1 side x 595FT
long/27=485CY x 1.82=884T
Damage: Embankment erosion [1 side]caused aggregate loss of 884T
Location#17.2 Asphalt pavement washout southeast side of roadway
[measured as 2 triangles in plan view with common base length of 8LF]
Dimension: 15FT long x 8FT wide/2 x 5.5FT deep/27 = 12CY x 1.82=22T
21 FT long x 8FT wide/2 x 5.5FT deep/27= 17CY x 1.82= 31T
Damage: Paved roadway erosion caused aggregate[53 x 0.94=50T]and
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danaln fo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 7 of 33
asphalt[53 x 0.06=31]loss of approximately 53T. The tonnage split was
calculated as follows:
0.33FT asphalt depth/5.5FT total depth =0.06
These tonnages are approximate due to rounding errors and a slight
difference in density, however they are reasonable for estimating purposes.
Location#17.3 Pavement washout full width of roadway[rectangular in plan
view]
Dimension: 17FT long x 21 FT wide x 5.5FT deep/27= 73CY x 1.82= 132T
Damage: Paved roadway erosion caused aggregate[132 x 0.94= 124T]and
asphalt[132 x 0.06=8T]loss of approximately 132T
Location#17.4 Pavement washout east half of roadway[rectangular in plan
view]
Dimension: 47FT long x 11 FT wide x 5.5FT deep/27= 105CY x 1.82= 192T
Damage: Paved roadway erosion caused aggregate[192 x 0.94 = 180T]and
asphalt[192 x 0.06= 12T)loss of approximately 192T
Location#17.5 Pavement washout full width of roadway [rectangular in plan
view]
Dimension: 130FT long x 21 FT wide x 5.5FT deep/27=556CY x 1.82=
1014T
Damage: Paved roadway erosion caused aggregate[1014 x 0.94=9531)
and asphalt[1014 x 0.06=61T]loss of approximately 1014T
Location#17.6 Pavement washout portion of east half of roadway
[rectangular in plan view]
Dimension: 47FT long x 7FT wide x 5.5FT deep/27=67CY x 1.82 = 122T
Damage: Paved roadway erosion caused aggregate[122 x 0.94 = 115T]and
asphalt[122 x 0.06=7T]loss of approximately 122T
Location#17.7 Pavement washout full width of roadway[rectangular in plan
view]
Dimension: 92FT long x 21 FT wide x 5.5FT deep/27=394CY x 1.82= 717T
Damage: Paved roadway erosion caused aggregate[717 x 0.94=674T] and
asphalt[717 x 0.06=43T]loss of approximately 717T
Location#17 Material Summary: Calculated loss= 3114T made up of 2980T
of aggregate and 134T of asphalt.
Location#18 Road EM-52-35-1.4[49th Street—from Brantner intersection
southwest]
Start GPS:40.36478,-104.70493 End GPS:40.36358,-104.70571
Note: This site is listed for information only. The GPS coordinates shown
below from the site visit with Weld County personnel are within the limits of
work completed under the City of Evans PW Ref#EVANS09 EMMIE
#00302. This work is not covered under this PW since it was already claimed
under the City of Evans PW. This information was confirmed in the field with
the FEMA Project Specialist who wrote the PW for City of Evans.
Location#19 Road EM-46-25-0 [Detour Route between Hwy 60 and CR25]
Start[East]GPS: 40.32057,-104.81143 End [West]GPS:40.31919,
-104.82419
Floodmap#0802660750C dated 9/28/82 Floodplain Zone A
Dimension: Road: 3700LF x 24FT wide x 0.09FT deep/27=296CY x 1.82 =
540T
Embankment: (5FT wide x 3FT deep/2)x 1 side x 185FT long/27=51CY x
1.82=94T
Damage: Road surface and embankment erosion [1 side]caused aggregate
loss of 634T.
Location#20 Road EM-46-23-.9 [Detour Route between CR23 and CR25]
Start GPS:40.31915,-104.82977 End GPS:40.31919,-104.83334[23-25]
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emm ie/,Danal nfo=i source.fema.net,S SL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 8 of 33
Floodmap#0802660750C dated 9/28/82[not in floodplain]
Dimension: Road: 1000LF x 24FT wide x 0.11 FT deep/27=98CY x 1.82=
178T
Damage: Road surface erosion caused aggregate loss of 178T.
Location#21 Road EM-129.5-127-.2 [Actual Description: EM-129-127.7-.2
on Rd 94]
GPS: 40.67001,-103.83154
Floodmap#0802660425C [Panel not printed]
Dimension: Road: 75LF x 4FT wide x 3FT deep/27=33CY x 1.82=61T
Embankment: (5FT wide x 2FT deep/2)x 1 side x 150FT long/27=28CY x
1.82 =51T
Damage: Road surface and embankment erosion [1 side]caused aggregate
loss of 112T.
Scope of Work: PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00561(0):
WORK COMPLETED: The Applicant used Force Account Labor, Equipment,
and Material along with some contracted hauling to complete the repairs to
the Locations shown on this PW. The work on this PW is itemized by location
showing the road and its location relative to the nearest intersection along
with GPS coordinates. Photos were taken and are attached. The roads and
culverts were maintained in above average condition with well-developed and
maintained ditches. The quantities are estimated from site visits and costs
are estimated using the CDOT pricing for similar work complete and in-place.
These costs should account for the labor and equipment required to complete
the work. The following Locations are shown as Work Completed except as
noted where work is required in the spring such as paving.
Location#1 Road EM-110-27-.5
Scope: Replace eroded road surface and embankment aggregate[81T].
Discussions with the foreman indicated that the operator was able to pull up
material that had washed from the roadway to the right-of-way to use in
rebuilding the damaged area,therefore only 81T was placed and the
remainder was reclaimed.
Cost: 81T x$33.70/T=$2,729.70
Location#2 Road EM-27-110-.8
Scope: Replace eroded road surface and embankment aggregate[270T]
Cost: 270T x$33.70/T=$9,099.00
Location#3 Road EM-108-27-.5
Scope: Replace eroded road surface and embankment aggregate[81T].
Discussions with the foreman indicated that the operator was able to pull up
material that had washed from the roadway to the right-of-way to use in
rebuilding the damaged area,therefore only 81T was placed and the
remainder was reclaimed.
Cost: 81T x$33.70/T= $2,729.70
Location#4 Road EM-94-43-.0
Scope: Replace eroded road surface and embankment aggregate[54T]
Cost: 54T x$33.70/T= $1,819.80
Location#5 Road EM-90-15-.1
Scope: Replace eroded road surface and embankment aggregate(995T]
Cost: 995T x$33.70/T=$33,531.50
Location#6 Road EM-15-90-.5
Scope: Replace eroded road surface and embankment aggregate[754T]
Cost: 754T x$33.70/T=$25,409.80
https://connect I.dhs.gov/emm ie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,S SL+dispatch Destination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 9 of 33
Location#7 Road EM-61-76-.0 (.1)
Scope: Replace eroded road surface and embankment aggregate[187T]
Cost: 187T x$33.70/T=$6,301.90
Location#8 Road EM-71-80-2.1
Scope: Replace eroded road surface and embankment aggregate[212T]
Cost: 212T x$33.70/T=$7,144.40
Location#9 Road EM-74-392-2.1
Scope: Replace eroded embankment aggregate[93T]
Cost: 93T x$33.70/T=$3,134.10
Location#10 Road EM-68-69-2.1
Scope: Replace eroded road surface and embankment aggregate[2881]
Aggregate Cost: 288T x$33.70/T=$9,705.60
Magnesium Chloride Cost: 275 gal x$0.55/gal=$151.25
Note: Applicant indicated that the Oil Company working in the area hauled
the material,therefore no cost to the Applicant, however the Applicant utilized
FA Labor and Equipment to compact, reclaim, and grade the material.
Although the Applicant did not have cost associated with material, the
estimated cost shown above using the CDOT unit price covers the FA Labor
and Equipment. The Applicant reported the cost of magnesium chloride at
$0.49/gal, therefore a cost of$0.55/gal was used above to include the
distributor truck and driver. The Applicant placed 11,000 gallons of
Magnesium Chloride after the roadway was prepared at a reported
application rate of approximately 5,000 gallons/mile. Therefore,the
application rate is approximately 1 gal/LF of roadway.
Location#11 Road EM-72-31-.4
Scope: Replace eroded road surface and embankment aggregate[96T]
Cost: 96T x$33.70/T=$3,235.20
Location#12 Road EM-51-58-.5
Scope: Replace eroded road surface and embankment aggregate[2171]
Cost: 217T x$33.70/T=$7,312.90
Note: Applicant indicated that gravel was placed from damaged area to the
house at that end of the road, however this gravel was not storm damage
related.
Location#13 Road EM-45-54.5-.2
Note: According to the Weld County consultant[Base Tactical)EM-45-
54.5-.2 covers cleaning of the ditch just south of Hwy 34 on CR 45. This
work is incidental to the culvert repair where this ditch goes under CR45.
Therefore, this work is not covered under this PW but is covered under the
Weld County Culverts PW#WELCO35.
Cost: $0.00
Location#14 Road Em-43-54-.2[Road repaired by Oil Company]
Scope: County supervision of material placement by Oil Company and
grading by County labor and equipment.
Cost: Labor [1 hr x$39.58/hr] +[7hr x$59.06/hr]=$453.00
Equipment: [1 hr x$70/hr cost code 8332]+[7hr x$14/hr cost code 8801]=
$168.00
Total Cost=453+ 168 = $621
Location#15 Road EM-388-53-.25[Paved]
Scope: Replace damaged asphalt[28T]and eroded shoulder aggregate
[16T)
Aggregate Cost: 16T x$33.70/T=$539.20
Repair Asphalt Pavement[use 7"thick]
Sawcut Pavement: 16LF+42LF+ 16=7415 x$3/LF=$222
Unclassified Excavation [use CDOT code 203-00010$14.18/CY complete in
place]:
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 10 of 33
42LF x 16LF x 0.58FT deep=390CF/27= 14.44CY x$14.18/CY=$204.76
Install Asphalt Pavement[use CDOT code 403-33741 $81.70/T]:
14.44CY x 1.97T/CY=28.5T use 29T x$81.70/T=$2,369.30
Traffic Control Estimate and small job adder: $1000
Mobilization/Demob Estimate: $1,500
Total Cost: 540+222 +205+2370+$1000+$1,500=$5,837
Location#16.1 Road EM-52-US85-.0[Paved]
Scope: Replace eroded shoulder aggregate[109T]
Cost: 109T x$33.70/7=$3,673.30
Location#16.2 Road EM-52-US85-.0[Paved]
Scope: Replace eroded shoulder aggregate[1.82T]
Cost: 1.821 x$33.70/1=$60.66
Location#16.3 Road EM-52-US85-.0[Paved]
• Scope: Replace eroded shoulder aggregate[1.82T]
Cost: 1.82T x$33.70(7=$60.66
Location#16.4 Road EM-52-US85-.0[Paved]
Scope: Replace eroded shoulder aggregate[4.5T]
Cost: 4.5T x$33.70/7=$151.65
Total Cost Location#16=3673.30+60.66+60.66+ 151.65=$3,946.27
Location#17 Road EM-Brantner-35th [Paved]
Note: The work completed at the time of inspection included removal of
damaged roadway and embankment materials and filling of those damaged
areas up to the grade of the existing asphalt pavement. The work to be
completed includes sawcutting the asphalt and removing material down to the
depth of the adjoining asphalt section [measured in the Evans PW at 4"thick]
along with installation of new asphalt.
Location#17.1 Embankment southeast side of roadway
Scope: Replace eroded embankment aggregate[884T]
Aggregate Cost: 884T x$33.70/7=$29,790.80
Location#17.2 Pavement washout southeast side of roadway[triangular in
plan view]
Scope: Replace eroded aggregate base[53T]
Aggregate Cost: 53T x$33.70/7=$1,786.10
Work Completed Total=$1,786.10
Work to be Completed:
Scope: Replace Asphalt Pavement[use 4"thick same as used in Evans PW
on Brantner which was measured]
Sawcut Pavement: 9LF + 16LF+22LF +9LF=56LF x$3/LF=$168
Unclassified Excavation [use CDOT code 203-00010$14.18/CY complete in
place]:
38LF x 9LF x 0.33FT deep= 112.86CF/27=4.18CY x$14.18/CY=$59.27
Install Asphalt Pavement[use CDOT code 403-33741 $81.70/7]:
4.18CY x 1.97T/CY=8.23T use 9T x$81.70/7=$735.30
Work to be Completed Total =$962.57
Location#17.3 Pavement washout full width of roadway[rectangular in plan
view]
Scope: Replace eroded aggregate base[132T]
Aggregate Cost: 132T x$33.70/7=$4,448.40
Work Completed Total=$4,448.40
Work to be Completed:
Scope: Replace Asphalt Pavement[use 4"thick]
Sawcut Pavement: 21LF+21 LF=42LF x$3/LF =$126
Unclassified Excavation [use CDOT code 203-00010$14.18/CY complete in
place]:
https://connect 1.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danal nfo=i source.fema.net,S SL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page I 1 of 33
17LF x 21LF x 0.33FT deep= 117.81CF/27=4.36CY x$14.18/CY= $61.82
Install Asphalt Pavement[use CDOT code 403-33741 $81.70/T]:
4.36CY x 1.97T/CY=8.6T use 9T x$81.70/T=$735.30
Work to be Completed Total =$923.12
Location#17.4 Pavement washout east half of roadway[rectangular in plan
view]
Scope: Replace eroded aggregate base[192T]
Aggregate Cost: 192T x$33.70/T=$6,470.40
Work Completed Total=$6,470.40
Work to be Completed:
Scope: Replace Asphalt Pavement[use 4"thick]
Sawcut Pavement: 12LF+48LF+ 12LF=72LF x$3/LF=$216
Unclassified Excavation[use CDOT code 203-00010$14.18/CY complete in
place]:
48LF x 12LF x 0.33FT deep= 190.08CF/27= 7.04CY x$14.18/CY= $99.83
Install Asphalt Pavement[use CDOT code 403-33741 $81.70/T]:
7.04CY x 1.977/CY= 13.87T use 14T x$81.70fT=$1,143.80
Work to be Completed Total =$1,459.63
Location#17.5 Pavement washout full width of roadway[rectangular in plan
view]
Scope: Replace eroded aggregate base[1014T]
Aggregate Cost: 1014T x$33.70/T= $34,171.80
Work Completed Total =$34,171.80
Work to be Completed:
Scope: Replace Asphalt Pavement[use 4"thick]
Sawcut Pavement: 21 LF+21 LF =42LF x$3/LF=$126
Unclassified Excavation [use CDOT code 203-00010$14.18/CY complete in
place]:
132LF x 21LF x 0.33FT deep=914.76CF/27=33.88CY x$14.18/CY=
$480.42
Install Asphalt Pavement[use CDOT code 403-33741 $81.70(7]:
33.88CY x 1.977/CY=66.74T use 67T x$81.70/7=$5,473.90
Work to be Completed Total=$6,080.32
Location#17.6 Pavement washout portion of east half of roadway
[rectangular in plan view]
Scope: Replace eroded aggregate base[122T]
Aggregate Cost: 122T x$33.70/1"=$4,111.40
Work Completed Total = $4,111.40
Work to be Completed:
Scope: Replace Asphalt Pavement[use 4"thick]
Sawcut Pavement: 8LF+49LF+8LF=65LF x$3/LF =$195
Unclassified Excavation[use CDOT code 203-00010$14.18/CY complete in
place]:
49LF x 8LF x 0.33FT deep= 129.36CF/27 =4.79CY x$14.18/CY=$67.92
Install Asphalt Pavement[use CDOT code 403-33741 $81.70/1]:
4.79CY x 1.977/CY=9.44T use 10T x$81.70/T=$817.00
Work to be Completed=$1,079.92
Location#17.7 Pavement washout full width of roadway[rectangular in plan
view]
Scope: Replace eroded aggregate base[7171]
Aggregate Cost: 717T x$33.70/T=$24,162.90
Work Completed Total =$24,162.90
Work to be Completed:
Scope: Replace Asphalt Pavement[use 4"thick]
Sawcut Pavement: 21 LF+21 LF=42LF x$3/LF=$126
Unclassified Excavation[use CDOT code 203-00010$14.18/CY complete in
place]:
94LF x 21LF x 0.33FT deep=651.42CF/27=24.13CY x$14.18/CY=
$342.16
https://connect].dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 12 of 33
Install Asphalt Pavement[use CDOT code 403-33741 $81.70/T]:
24.13CY x 1.97T/CY=47.54T use 48T x$81.70/T=$3,921.60
Work to be Completed Total=$4,389.76
Total Cost Location 17[Paved]
Work Completed:
Aggregate replacement=29,790.80+ 1,786.10+4,448.40+6,470.40+
34,171.80+4,111.40+24,162.90= $104,941.80
Work Completed Total =$104,941.80
Work to be Completed:
Pavement replacement:
Sawcut= 168+ 126+216+ 126+ 195+ 126= $957
Unclassified Excavation=59.27+61.82+99.83+480.42+67.92+342.16
=$1,111.42
Install Asphalt=735.30+735.30+ 1143.80+5473.90+817+3921.60=
$12,826.90
Work to be Completed Total=957+ 1111.42+ 12826.90=$14,895.32
Location#18 Road EM-52-35-1.4[49th Street—from Brantner intersection
southwest]
Scope: Work at this location is covered under a separate PW. See PW Ref
#EVANS09 EMMIE#00302.
Cost: $0.00
Location#19 Road EM-46-25-0 [Detour Route between Hwy 60 and CR25]
Scope: Replace eroded road surface and embankment aggregate[634T].
Apply magnesium chloride[5000 gal]since it was used as a detour route
[incidental to the permanent work]. Based on discussions with the road
foreman,there were 6 loads of aggregate at the intersection of Hwy 60 and
CR25 on the southern embankment and 17 loads of aggregate on the
roadway from Hwy 60 west toward CR25 approximately 3700 feet. This
section was sprayed with magnesium chloride twice since it was a detour
route. The Applicant indicated an application rate of 5,000 gallons/mile each
time, approximately 10,000 gallons were placed on the section between Hwy
60 and CR25 which is 1 mile.
Aggregate Cost: 634T x$33.70/T=$21,365.80
Magnesium Chloride Cost: 10,000 gal x$0.55/gal=$5,500.00
Work Completed Total Cost: $21,365.80+$5,500=$26,865.80
Location#20 Road EM-46-23-.9 [Detour Route between CR23 and CR25]
Scope: Replace eroded road surface aggregate[178T]. Apply magnesium
chloride[2 passes at 5000 gallons each= 10000 gal]since this was used as
a detour route[incidental to the permanent work]. Based on discussions with
the road foreman,6 loads of aggregate were placed on the section of
roadway between CR23 and CR25. The applicant indicated that the
application rate of magnesium chloride is approximately 5,000 gallons/mile
and it was applied twice. Therefore the segment between CR23 and CR25
would have 10,000 gallons placed since the distance is 1 mile.]
Aggregate Cost: 178T x$33.70/T=$5,998.60
Magnesium Chloride Cost: 10000 gal x$0.55/gal=$5,500.00
Work Completed Total: $5,998.60+$5,500=$11,498.60
Location#21 Road EM-129.5-127-.2 [Actual Description: EM-129-127.7-.2
on Rd 94]
Scope: Replace eroded road surface and embankment aggregate[112T]
Work Completed Cost: 112T x$33.70/T=$3,774.40
WORK COMPLETED SUMMARY:
Aggregate: 7499.14 Tons at a cost of$252,721.02
Magnesium Chloride: 20,275 gallons at a cost of$11,151.25
Asphalt: 29Tons at a cost of$5,837.00
Work Completed Total=$269,709.27
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 13 of 33
WORK TO BE COMPLETED SUMMARY:
Asphalt: 157Tons at a cost of$14,895.32
Work to be Completed Total=$14,895.32
PROJECT NOTES:
1. Following the September 2013 flooding,applicant used contract services
and/or force account resources to re-open roads/bridges and repair damage
as soon as possible. At several damage sites, repairs appear to have
returned the facility to its pre-disaster design,function and capacity with no
known remaining work to be completed. However at other sites due to the
onset of winter conditions, applicant was unable to complete the restoration,
thus leaving work to be completed. Finally, at some sites, applicant has
expressed concern that unanticipated work may be still be required as a
result of conditions beyond their control,such as possible subsequent
settlement resulting from saturated soil conditions following the flood or
where high water levels or erosion/deposition prevented a complete damage
assessment.
2. This PW addresses all validated flood related damages at the specified
site(s), including completed work and work to be completed (which damages
were known to the applicant and reported to FEMA by the effective date of
this PW). In the event that applicant identifies subsequent,currently
unknown flood related damage at such site(s),applicant is advised to contact
the State of Colorado Office of Emergency Management to report the
damage and request an inspection prior to its repair. In the event that the
State validates the damage as a direct result of the September 2013 flooding,
the State will request FEMA prepare a version of this PW to address the
eligible cost of repair.
3. Pursuant to 44 CFR 13.42, Grantees and Subgrantees are required to
retain records, including source documentation,to support expenditures/costs
incurred against the grant award,for 3 years from the date of submission to
FEMA of the final Financial Status Report.
4. The applicant must obtain all required federal, state, and local permits
prior to the commencement of work.
5. The subgrantee is requesting direct administrative costs that are directly
chargeable to this specific project. Associated eligible work is related to
administration of the PA project only and in accordance with 44 CFR 13.22.
These costs are treated consistently and uniformly as direct costs in all
federal awards and other subgrantee activities and are not included in any
approved indirect costs.
6. Project was reviewed for 406 Hazard Mitigation and a copy of 406 HMP
proposal is attached with this project.
7. The applicant is aware that all projects are subject to an insurance review
as stated in 44 C.F.R. Sections 206.252 and 206.253. If applicable,an
insurance determination will be made either as anticipated proceeds or actual
proceeds in accordance with the applicant's insurance policy that may affect
the total amount of the project.
8. The applicant is required to adhere to State and Federal Government
Procurement rules and regulations and maintain adequate records to support
the basis for all purchasing of goods and materials and contracting services
for projects approved under the Public Assistance program, as stated in 44
CFR 13.36.The applicant has advised they have followed their normal
procurement procedures.
9. Applicant has completed a substantial percentage of the work but will not
have cost data available within the fourteen day Pocket Guide rule. Per Field
Operations Pocket Guide, Section 7, Cost Estimates, Page 26,"If the
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 14 of 33
applicant has not produced cost data within two weeks of the site inspection,
the Project Specialist will prepare the PW on the basis of an estimate for the
work accomplished".Applicant, CO State representative and FEMA
personnel jointly conducted all inspections and agreed to use CDOT costs for
in-place costs to derive estimates on this project worksheet.Applicant
understands that all actual support documentation, invoices, FA records,
contract and proof of payment will be required for final reconciliation and or
closeout process.Attached is the CDOT average in-place cost for materials.
10. The cost of aggregate in-place was established using CDOT average in-
place cost for materials dated May 17,2013. CDOT Code 304-06000 for
Aggregate Base Course[Class 6)at a unit cost of$16.85/T for greater than
50,000T was multiplied by a factor of 2 to get the price used in this PW of
$33.70/1". The CDOT unit price was doubled due to a lack of economies of
scale for the small jobs and remote locations that were covered by this PW.
11. The county measures its quantities in terms of tons. Field measured
quantities were computed in cubic yards. The Weld County Engineering and
Construction Criteria document specifies materials densities of 1461bs/CF for
Hot Mix Asphalt, 1351bs/CF for Aggregate Base Course, and 1201bs/CF for fill
material. The project specialist used these densities to compute conversion
factors to apply to the cubic yard computations as shown below:
Hot Mix Asphalt: [1461bs/CF x 27CF/CY]/20001bs/Ton = 1.97 T/CY
Aggregate Base Course: [1351bs/CF x 27CF/CY]/2000lbs/Ton= 1.82 T/CY
Fill material: [1201bs/CF x 27CF/CY]/20001bs/Ton = 1.62 T/CY
For PW#WELCO08,the aggregate used by the Applicant to complete the
repairs was either surface gravel or Class 6,therefore the Aggregate Base
Course conversion of 1.82T/CY was used.
Hazard Mitigation Proposal
Is effective mitigation feasible on this site? I Yes
If you answered Yes to the above question,the next question is required
Will mitigation be performed on this site? I Yes
If you answered Yes to the above question,the next question is required
Do you wish to attach a Hazard Mitigation Proposal?'Yes
If you answered Yes to the above question,the next two questions are required
Please provide the Scope of Work for the estimate: HMP Attached
(maximum 4000 characters)
Would you like to add the Hazard Mitigation Yes
Proposal as a cost line item to the project cost?
GIS Coordinates
Project Location Latitude Longitude
Location 1 40.78342 -104.80159
Special Considerations
1. Does the damaged facility or item of work have insurance coverage and/or is it an insurable risk No
(e.g., buildings,equipment,vehicles, etc)?
If you would like to make any comments, please enter them below.
(maximum 4000 characters)
Insurance Policy on file at JFO.
2. Is the damaged facility located within a floodplain or coastal high hazard area and/or does it have yes
an impact on a floodplain or wetland?
If you would like to make any comments, please enter them below.
https://connectl.dhs.gov/emm ie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+di spatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 15 of 33
(maximum 4000 Characters)
Floodmap information is listed in the Damage Description for each location. Floodmaps are attached for those
locations that are in a floodplain.
3. Is the damaged facility or item of work located within or adjacent to a Coastal Barrier Resource No
System Unit or an Otherwise Protected Area?
4.Will the proposed facility repairs/reconstruction change the pre-disaster conditions (e.g., footprint, No
material, location,capacity, use of function)?
5. Does the applicant have a hazard mitigation proposal or would the applicant like technical Yes
assistance for a hazard mitigation proposal?
If you would like to make any comments,please enter them below.
(maximum 4000 characters)
HMP Attached
6. Is the damaged facility on the National Register of Historic Places or the state historic listing? Is it No
older than 50 years?Are there more,similar buildings near the site?
7.Are there any pristine or undisturbed areas on,or near,the project site?Are there large tracts of No
forestland?
8.Are there any hazardous materials at or adjacent to the damaged facility and/or item of work? No
9.Are there any other environmental or controversial issues associated with the damaged facility No
and/or item of work?
Attachments
User Date Document Description Hard Copy File File Name Action
Type Reference
PAUL 02-04- Floodplain Firmettes PW#WELCO08 Firmettes.pdf View
HESSE 2014 (2.44 Mb)
For Category C, D,E,F,and G Projects only
Is effective mitigation feasible on this project? Yes
If you answered Yes to the above question,the next question is required
Will mitigation be performed on any sites in this project? Yes
If you answered Yes to the above question,the next question is required
Do you wish to attach a Hazard Mitigation Proposal? Yes
If you answered Yes to the above question,the next two questions are required
Please provide the Scope of Work HMP attached
for the estimate:
Would you like to add the Hazard Mitigation Yes
Proposal as a cost line item to the project cost?
Hazard Mitigation Proposal -0909
# Code Material and/or Description Unit Unit of Unit Price Subgra
p Type Cost Estimate Action
Quantity yp
Measure Budget Class
***Version 0***
1 9999 Rip rap 291 CY $83.17 $24,202.47
2 9999 Unclassified fill 141 CY $17.84 $2,515.44
3 9999 Grass seed 12 LB $6.00 $72.00
4 9999 Labor 7 HR $30.00 $210.00
Total Cost:$26,999.91
Comments
https://connect 1.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 16 of 33
HMP attached
Attachments
User Date Document Type Description Hard Copy File File Name Action
Reference
PAUL 02-05- Mitigation PW#WELCO08HMP.pdf
HESSE 2014 Proposal HMP (145.41 kb) View
Cost Estimate
Is this Project Worksheet for
(Preferred) Repair
Material Unit Unit of Subgrant Cost
Sequence Code and/or Quantity Measure Unit Price Budget Class Type Estimate Action
Description
***Version 0***
Work Completed
1 9999 Locations 1 LS $ CONSTRUCTION Work $269,709.27
1-21 269,709.27 Completed
Work To Be Completed
Work To
2 9999 Location 17 1 LS 14,895.32 CONSTRUCTION Be $ 14,895.32
Completed
Direct Subgrantee Admin Cost
Direct Direct
3 9901 Administrative 1 LS $ 1,000.00 INDIRECT Subgrantee $ 1,000.00
Costs CHARGES Admin Cost
(Subgrantee)
Total Cost: $285,604.59
Insurance Adjustments(Deductibles, Proceeds and Settlements)-5900/5901
Subgrant
Sequence Code Material and/or Description Unit Unit of Unit Budget Type Cost
Action
Quantity Measure Price Class Estimate
Total Cost: $0.00
Hazard Mitigation Proposal-0909
Subgrant
Sequence Code Material and/or Description Unit Unit of Unit Budget Type Cost
Action
q p Quantity Measure Price Class Estimate
*n Version 0***
1 9999 Rip rap 291 CY $83.17 $24,202.47
2 9999 Unclassified fill 141 CY $ 17.84 $2,515.44
3 9999 Grass seed 12 LB $6.00 $72.00
4 9999 Labor 7 HR $30.00 $210.00
Total Cost: $26,999.91
Total Cost Estimate: $312,604.50
(Preferred Estimate Type+Insurance Adjustments+ Hazard Mitigation Proposal)
https://connect I.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SS L+d ispatch Destination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 17 of 33
Comments
Cost calculations are shown in the scope of work for each location. Be advised there are some rounding errors.
Attachments
User Date Document Description Hard Copy File File Name Action
Type Reference
PAUL 02-05- Calculation Unit Cost PW#WELCO08 Unit Cost View
HESSE 2014 Sheet Information Info.pdf(19.89 kb)
PAUL 02-05- Calculation PW#WELCO08 DAC.pdf
HESSE 2014 Sheet DAC Sheet (236.50 kb) View
Existing Insurance Information
Insurance Type Policy No. Bldg/Property Content Insurance Deductible Years
Amount Amount Amount Amount Required
Comments
Attachments
Comments and Attachments
Name of Section Comment Attachment
The applicant must notify the state if there are any changes in the
Project Description scope of work prior to starting the repairs. Failure to notify the State
Division of Emergency Management may jeopardize receipt of
federal funds.
PW#WELCO08
Location
Maps Partl.pdf
Damage Facilities PW#WELCO08
Location
Maps Part2.1.pdf
PW WELCO08
Photos.1.pdf
Special Considerations PW#WELCO08
Firmettes.pdf
Mitigation HMP attached PW#WELCO08
HMP.pdf
PW#WELCO08 Unit
Cost Estimate Cost calculations are shown in the scope of work for each location. Cost Info.pdf
Be advised there are some rounding errors. PW#WELCO08
DAC.pdf
PW#WELCO08 90-91
Form 90-91
SIGNED.pdf
Bundle Reference#(Amendment#) Date Awarded
PA-08-CO-4145-State-0035(34) 03-03-2014
Subgrant Application - FEMA Form 90-91
Note:The Effective Cost Share for this application is 75%
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emm ie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 18 of 33
FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
PROJECT WORKSHEET
DISASTER PROJECT NO. PAID NO. DATE CATEGORY
WELCO08 02-18-2014
FEMA 14145 I- IDR I-CO 99123-00 C
APPLICANT:WELD(COUNTY) WORK COMPLETE AS OF:
01-23-2014:95%
Site 1 of 1
DAMAGED FACILITY:
COUNTY: Weld
Various County Roads-Gravel and Paved
LOCATION: LATITUDE: LONGITUDE:
40.78342 -104.80159
PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00561(0):
Various County Roads shown below as Locations 1 through 21. Each location has a GPS listed for the
damaged area.
DAMAGE DESCRIPTION AND DIMENSIONS:
PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00561(0):
During the incident period of September 11,2013 through September 30,2013,the declared severe storms caused flooding,landslides and
mudslides throughout Weld County in Colorado. The gravel roads sustained damages from overtopping of roads,high water levels in drainage
ditches and overloaded culverts. Damages commonly consisted of shoulder and embankment erosion,washout of road base and aggregate
surfacing. This PW describes 21 damaged road locations. Total damages at the 21 locations include total aggregate loss of 7499.14 Tons and
asphalt pavement loss of 186 Tons. Damages to culverts and bridges are covered under separate PWs. [Refer to Scope Notes 10 and 11 for cost
and conversion factors.]
Location#1 Road EM-110-27-.5
Begin GPS'.40.78342,-104.80159 End GPS:40.78334,-104.80379
Floodmap#0802660175C[Panel not printed]
Dimension: Road:585LF x 22FT wide x 0.33FT deep/27=157CY x 1.82=287T
Embankment: (1.5FT wide x 1.5FT deep/2)x 2 sides x 585FT long/27=49CY x 1.82=89T
Damage: Road surface and embankment erosion[both sides]caused aggregate loss of 376T. No damage to CMP.
Location#2 Road EM-27-110-.8
Begin GPS:40.80214,-104.81049 End GPS:40.80310,-104.81047
Floodmap#0802660175C[Panel not printed]
Dimension: Road:340LF x 22FT wide x 0.33FT deep/27=91 CY x 1.82=167T
Embankment: (1.5FT wide x 3FT deep/2)x 2 sides x 340FT long/27=57CY x 1.82=103T
Damage: Road surface and embankment erosion[both sides]caused aggregate loss of 270T. No damage to CMP.
Location#3 Road EM-108-27-.5
Begin GPS:40.76863,-104.79212 End GPS:40.76863,-104.79316
Floodmap#0802660175C[Panel not printed]
Dimension: Road:275LF x 22FT wide x 0.33FT deep/27=74CY x 1.82=135T
Embankment: (2FT wide x 1.53FT deep/2)x 2 sides x 275FT long/27=31CY x 1.82=55T
Damage: Road surface and embankment erosion[both sides]caused aggregate loss of 190T. No damage to CMP.
Location#4 Road EM-94-43-.0
Begin GPS'.40.66800,-104.65839 End GPS:40.66768,-104.65836
Floodmap#0802660350C[Panel not printed]
Dimension: Road:100LF x 6FT wide x 0.67FT deep/27=15CY x 1.82=27T
Embankment: (3.5FT wide x 2FT deep/2)x 1 side x 115FT long/27=15CY x 1.82=27T
Damage: Road surface and embankment erosion[1 side]caused aggregate loss of 54T. No damage to CMP.
Location#5 Road EM-90-15-.1 [9 locations through 90-19-3.3 approximately 150LF each total 1350LF at the following locations:90-15-.1,90-15-.5,
90-15-.7,90-15-.8,90-15-.9,90-15-1.1,90-15-1.5,90-19-3.1,and 90-15-3.3]
Begin GPS:40.63944,-104.91761 End GPS:40.63954,-104.82288
Floodmap#0802660325C Dated 9/28/82[not in floodplain]
Dimension: Road: 1350LF x 24FT wide x 0.33FT deep/27=396CY x 1.82=722T
Embankment: (2FT wide x 3FT deep/2)x 1 side x 1350FT long/27=150CY x 1.82=273T
Damage: Road surface and embankment erosion[1 side]caused aggregate loss of 995T
Location#6 Road EM-15-90-.5[6 locations through 15-90-2.8 approximately 150LF each total 900LF at the following locations:15-90-.5,15-90-.8,
15-90-1.6,15-90-2.1,15-90-2.5,and 15-90-2.8]
Begin GPS:40.66952,-104.92444 End GPS:40.67924,-104.92428
Floodmap#0802660325O dated 9/28/82[not in floodplain]
Dimension: Road:900LF x 24FT wide x 0.33FT deep/27=264CY x 1.82=461T
Embankment: (3FT wide x 3FT deep/2)x 1 side x 900FT long/27=150CY x 1.82=273T
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emmie/,DanaInfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 19 of 33
Damage: Road surface and embankment erosion[2 sides]caused aggregate loss of 754T
Location#7 Road EM-61-76-.0(.1)
Begin GPS:40.5425,-104.48934 End GPS:40.54170,-104.48931
Floodmap#080266052C[Panel not printed]
Dimension: Road:280LF x 24FT wide x 0.35FT deep/27=87CY x 1.82=159T
Embankment: (1.5FT wide x 2FT deep/2)x 1 side x 280FT long/27=16CY x 1.82=281
Damage: Road surface and embankment erosion[1 side]caused aggregate loss of 187T
Location#8 Road EM-71-80-2.1
Begin GPS:40.59829,-104.3941 End GPS:40.59962,-104.39398
Floodmap#0802660525O[Panel not printed]
Dimension: Road:200LF x 24FT wide x 0.25FT deep/27=44CY x 1.82=81T
Embankment: (3FT wide x 2FT deep/2)x 1 side x 470FT long/27=52CY x 1.82=95T
Embankment: (1.5FT wide x 1.5FT deep/2)x 1 side x 470FT long/27=20CY x 1.82=36T
Damage: Road surface and embankment erosion[2 sides]caused aggregate loss of 212T
Location#9 Road EM-74-392-2.1
Begin GPS:40.52289,-104.37213 End GPS:40.52291,-104.37007
Floodmap#0802660525O[Panel not printed]
Dimension: Embankment: (2.5FT wide x 2FT deep/2)x 1 side x 550FT long/27=51CY x 1.82=93T
Damage: Road embankment erosion[1 side]caused aggregate loss of 93T
Location#10 Road EM-68-69-2.1
Begin GPS:40.47926,-104.37498 End GPS:40.47928,-104.37396
Floodmap#0802660675O dated 9/28/82[not in floodplain]
Dimension: Road:275LF x 25FT wide x 0.6FT deep/27=153CY x 1.82=279T
Embankment: (1FT wide x 1FT deep/2)x 1 side x 275FT long/27=5CY x 1.82=91
Magnesium Chloride'. 275LF x 1 gal/LF=275 gal.
Damage: Road surface and embankment erosion[1 side]caused aggregate loss of 288T
Location#11 Road EM-72-31-.4
Begin GPS:40.51011,-104.76512 End GPS:40.51013,-104.76553
Floodmap#0802660475D dated 9/22/99[not in floodplain]
Dimension: Road:110LF x 24FT wide x 0.5FT deep/27=49CY x 1.82=89T
Embankment: (1FT wide x 1FT deep/2)x 2 sides x 110FT long/27=4CY x 1.82=7T
Damage: Road surface and embankment erosion[2 sides]caused aggregate loss of 96T
Location#12 Road EM-51-58-.5
Begin GPS:40.41366,-104.58353 End GPS:40.41467,-104.58355
Floodmap#0802660645O dated 9/28/82[not in floodplain]
Dimension: Road: 100LF x 6FT wide x 3FT deep/27=67CY x 1.82=1221
Embankment: (3FT wide x 3FT deep/2)x 1 side x 312FT long/27=52CY x 1.82=95T
Damage: Road surface and embankment erosion[1 side]caused aggregate loss of 217T
Location#13 Road EM-45-54.5-.2
Note: According to the Weld County consultant[Base Tactical]EM-45-54.5-.2 covers cleaning of the ditch just south of Hwy 34 on CR 45. This
work is incidental to the culvert repair where this ditch goes under CR45. Therefore,this work is not covered under this PW but is covered under
the Weld County Culverts PW#WELCO35.
Location#14 Road Em-43-54-.2[Road repaired by Oil Company]
Begin GPS:40.38126,-104.65891 Mid GPS:40.38472,-104.65888
End GPS:40.38678,-104.65834
Floodmap#0802660639O dated 9/28/82 Floodplain Zone A4
Dimension: Road: 1960LF x 18FT wide/9=3920SY
Damage: Road surface and embankment erosion both sides caused aggregate loss. Applicant indicated that Oil Company repaired road and
embankment at the Oil Company's cost. No material cost incurred by Applicant only labor and equipment for supervision and grading.
Location#15 Road EM-388-53-.25[Paved]
Begin GPS:40.41037,-104.54981 End GPS:40.41370,-104.55771
Floodmap#0802660645C dated 9/28/82 Floodplain Zone A
Dimension: Road[asphalt]:42LF x 16FT wide x 0.58FT deep/27=14CY x 1.97=281
Shoulder (1FT wide x 0.17FT deep)x 2 sidesx 726FT long/27=9.1CY x 1.82=16T
Damage: Road surface[asphalt—281]and shoulder erosion[2 sides—approximately 30%within the GPS limits 2420 x 0.3=726LF]caused
aggregate loss of 16T.
Location#16 Road EM-52-US85-.0 is a paved road that had shoulder damages. This location is split up into 4 areas as shown below. There was
no damage to the pavement.
Location#16.1 Road EM-52-US85-.0[Paved]
Begin GPS:40.35999,-104.6959 End GPS:40.36147,-104.68857
Floodmap#0802660638C dated 9/28/82 Floodplain Zone A7
Dimension: Shoulder: (2FT wide x 0.33FT deep)x 2 sides x 1221 FT long/27=60CY x 1.82=109T
Damage: Shoulder erosion[2 sides—approximately 60%within the GPS limits 2035LF x 0.6=1221 LF]caused aggregate loss of 109T. No
damage to pavement.
Location#16.2 Road EM-52-US85-.0[Paved]
GPS:40.36309,-104.65900[southwest corner CR43 intersection]
Floodmap#0802660639O dated 9/28/82[not in floodplain]
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emm ie/,DanaInfo=isource.fema.net,S SL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 20 of 33
Dimension: Shoulder: (2FT wide x 0.33FT deep)x 1 side x 40FT long/27=ICY x 1.82=1.82T
Damage: Shoulder erosion[1 side—40LF]caused aggregate loss of 1.82T. No damage to pavement.
Location#16.3 Road EM-52-US85-.0[Paved]
GPS:40.36303,-104.67770[southwest corner CR41 intersection]
Floodmap#0802660638C dated 9/28/82 Floodplain Zone A7
Dimension: Shoulder: (2FT wide x 0.33FT deep)x 1 side x 40FT long/27=1CY x 1.82=1.82T
Damage: Shoulder erosion[1 side—40LF]caused aggregate loss of 1.82T. No damage to pavement.
Location#16.4 Road EM-52-US85-.0[Paved]
GPS:40.36303,-104.67770[extending 100LF west on north side of road at CR41 intersection]
Floodmap#0802660638C dated 9/28/82 Floodplain Zone A7
Dimension: Shoulder: (2FT wide x 0.33FT deep)x 1 side x 100FT long/27=2.4CY x 1.82=4.5T
Damage: Shoulder erosion[1 side—100LF]caused aggregate loss of 4.5T. No damage to pavement.
Location#17 Road EM-Brantner-35th [Paved]
Note: Within the GPS limits shown below,there are seven[7]areas of damage indicated as 17.1-17.7.
Begin GPS:40.36650.-104.70034 End GPS:40.36526,-104.70184[Note:This end point coincides with the beginning of City of Evans work
covered under a separate PW Ref#EVANS09 EMMIE#00302,therefore there is no apparent overlap of work being claimed.]
Floodmap#0801820001 B dated 4/2/79 Floodplain Zone A7 and Zone B
Floodmap#0802660638C dated 9/28/82 Floodplain Zone A7 and Zone B
Location#17.1 Embankment southeast side of roadway
Dimension: Embankment:(8FT wide x 5.5FT deep/2)x 1 side x 595FT long/27=485CY x 1.82=884T
Damage: Embankment erosion[1 side]caused aggregate loss of 884T
Location#17.2 Asphalt pavement washout southeast side of roadway[measured as 2 triangles in plan view with common base length of 8LF]
Dimension: 15FT long x 8FT wide/2 x 5.5FT deep/27=12CY x 1.82=22T
21FT long x 8FT wide/2 x 5.5FT deep/27=17CY x 1.82=31T
••
Damage: Paved roadway erosion caused aggregate[53 x 0.94=50T]and asphalt[53 x 0.06=3T]loss of approximately 53T. The tonnage split
was calculated as follows:
0.33FT asphalt depth/5.5FT total depth=0.06
These tonnages are approximate due to rounding errors and a slight difference in density,however they are reasonable for estimating purposes.
Location#17.3 Pavement washout full width of roadway[rectangular in plan view]
Dimension: 17FT long x 21FT wide x 5.5FT deep/27=73CY x 1.82=132T
Damage: Paved roadway erosion caused aggregate[132 x 0.94=124T]and asphalt[132 x 0.06=8T]loss of approximately 132T
Location#17.4 Pavement washout east half of roadway[rectangular in plan view]
Dimension: 47FT long x 11 FT wide x 5.5FT deep/27=105CY x 1.82=192T
Damage: Paved roadway erosion caused aggregate[192 x 0.94=1807]and asphalt[192 x 0.06=127]loss of approximately 192T
Location#17.5 Pavement washout full width of roadway[rectangular in plan view]
Dimension: 130FT long x 21FT wide x 5.5FT deep/27=556CY x 1.82=1014T
Damage: Paved roadway erosion caused aggregate[1014 x 0.94=953T]and asphalt[1014 x 0.06=617]loss of approximately 1014T
Location#17.6 Pavement washout portion of east half of roadway[rectangular in plan view]
Dimension: 47FT long x 7FT wide x 5.5FT deep/27=67CY x 1.82=1221
Damage: Paved roadway erosion caused aggregate[122 x 0.94=1157]and asphalt[122 x 0.06=7T]loss of approximately 122T
Location#17.7 Pavement washout full width of roadway[rectangular in plan view]
Dimension: 92FT long x 21 FT wide x 5.5FT deep/27=394CY x 1.82=717T
Damage: Paved roadway erosion caused aggregate[717 x 0.94=6747]and asphalt[717 x 0.06=43T]loss of approximately 717T
Location#17 Material Summary: Calculated loss=3114T made up of 2980T of aggregate and 134T of asphalt.
Location#18 Road EM-52-35-1.4[49th Street-from Brantner intersection southwest]
Start GPS:40.36478,-104.70493 End GPS:40.36358,-104.70571
Note: This site is listed for information only. The GPS coordinates shown below from the site visit with Weld County personnel are within the limits
of work completed under the City of Evans PW Ref#EVANS09 EMMIE#00302. This work is not covered under this PW since it was already
claimed under the City of Evans PW. This information was confirmed in the field with the FEMA Project Specialist who wrote the PW for City of
Evans.
Location#19 Road EM-46-25-0 [Detour Route between Hwy 60 and CR25]
Start[East]GPS'.40.32057,-104.81143 End[West]GPS'.40.31919,-104.82419
Floodmap#0802660750C dated 9/28/82 Floodplain Zone A
Dimension: Road:3700LF x 24FT wide x 0.09FT deep/27=296CY x 1.82=540T
Embankment: (5FT wide x 3FT deep/2)x 1 side x 185FT long/27=51CY x 1.82=94T
Damage: Road surface and embankment erosion[1 side]caused aggregate loss of 634T.
Location#20 Road EM-46-23-.9 [Detour Route between CR23 and CR25]
Start GPS:40.31915,-104.82977 End GPS'.40.31919,-104.83334[23-25]
Floodmap#0802660750C dated 9/28/82[not in floodplain]
Dimension: Road: 1000LF x 24FT wide x 0.11FT deep/27=98CY x 1.82=178T
Damage: Road surface erosion caused aggregate loss of 178T.
Location#21 Road EM-129.5-127-.2 [Actual Description:EM-129-127.7-.2 on Rd 94]
GPS: 40.67001,-103.83154
Floodmap#0802660425C[Panel not printed]
https://connect 1.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 21 of 33
Dimension: Road:75LF x 4FT wide x 3FT deep/27=33CY x 1.82=61T
Embankment: (5FT wide x 2FT deep/2)x 1 side x 150FT long/27=28CY x 1.82=51T
Damage: Road surface and embankment erosion[1 side]caused aggregate loss of 112T.
SCOPE OF WORK:
PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00561(0):
WORK COMPLETED: The Applicant used Force Account Labor,Equipment,and Material along with some contracted hauling to complete the
repairs to the Locations shown on this PW. The work on this PW is itemized by location showing the road and its location relative to the nearest
intersection along with GPS coordinates. Photos were taken and are attached. The roads and culverts were maintained in above average
condition with well-developed and maintained ditches. The quantities are estimated from site visits and costs are estimated using the CDOT pricing
for similar work complete and in-place. These costs should account for the labor and equipment required to complete the work. The following
Locations are shown as Work Completed except as noted where work is required in the spring such as paving.
Location#1 Road EM-110-27-.5
Scope: Replace eroded road surface and embankment aggregate[811]. Discussions with the foreman indicated that the operator was able to pull
up material that had washed from the roadway to the right-of-way to use in rebuilding the damaged area,therefore only 81T was placed and the
remainder was reclaimed.
Cost: 81T x$33.70/7=$2,729.70
Location#2 Road EM-27-110-.8
Scope: Replace eroded road surface and embankment aggregate[2701]
Cost: 270T x$33.70/T=$9,099.00
Location#3 Road EM-108-27-.5
Scope: Replace eroded road surface and embankment aggregate[B1T]. Discussions with the foreman indicated that the operator was able to pull
up material that had washed from the roadway to the right-of-way to use in rebuilding the damaged area,therefore only 81T was placed and the
remainder was reclaimed.
Cost: 81T x$33.701T=$2,729.70
Location#4 Road EM-94-43-.0
Scope: Replace eroded road surface and embankment aggregate[547]
Cost: 54T x$33.70/T_$1,819.80
Location#5 Road EM-90-15-.1
Scope: Replace eroded road surface and embankment aggregate[9951]
Cost: 995T x$33.70/T=$33,531.50
Location#6 Road EM-15-90-.5
Scope: Replace eroded road surface and embankment aggregate[754T]
Cost: 754T x$33.70/7=$25,409.80
Location#7 Road EM-61-76-.0(.1)
Scope: Replace eroded road surface and embankment aggregate[18711
Cost: 187T x$33.70/T=$6,301.90
Location#8 Road EM-71-80-2.1
Scope: Replace eroded road surface and embankment aggregate[2121]
Cost: 212T x$33.70/T=$7,144.40
Location#9 Road EM-74-392-2.1
Scope: Replace eroded embankment aggregate[931]
Cost: 93T x$33.70/T=$3,134.10
Location#10 Road EM-68-69-2.1
Scope: Replace eroded road surface and embankment aggregate[288T]
Aggregate Cost: 288T x$33.70/T=$9,705.60
Magnesium Chloride Cost: 275 gal x$0.55/gal=$151.25
Note: Applicant indicated that the Oil Company working in the area hauled the material,therefore no cost to the Applicant,however the Applicant
utilized FA Labor and Equipment to compact,reclaim,and grade the material. Although the Applicant did not have cost associated with material,
the estimated cost shown above using the CDOT unit price covers the FA Labor and Equipment. The Applicant reported the cost of magnesium
chloride at$0.49/gal,therefore a cost of$0.55/gal was used above to include the distributor truck and driver. The Applicant placed 11,000 gallons
of Magnesium Chloride after the roadway was prepared at a reported application rate of approximately 5,000 gallons/mile. Therefore,the
application rate is approximately 1 gal/LF of roadway.
Location#11 Road EM-72-31-.4
Scope: Replace eroded road surface and embankment aggregate[96T]
Cost: 96T x$33.70/7=$3,235.20
Location#12 Road EM-51-58-.5
Scope: Replace eroded road surface and embankment aggregate[2171]
Cost: 217T x$33.70/7=$7,312.90
Note: Applicant indicated that gravel was placed from damaged area to the house at that end of the road,however this gravel was not storm
damage related.
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emm ie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,S SL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 22 of 33
Location#13 Road EM-45-54.5-.2
Note: According to the Weld County consultant[Base Tactical]EM-45-54.5-.2 covers deaning of the ditch just south of Hwy 34 on CR 45. This
work is incidental to the culvert repair where this ditch goes under CR45. Therefore,this work is not covered under this PW but is covered under
the Weld County Culverts PW#WELCO35.
Cost: $0.00
Location#14 Road Em-43-54-.2[Road repaired by Oil Company]
Scope: County supervision of material placement by Oil Company and grading by County labor and equipment.
Cost: Labor: [1 hr x$39.58/hr]+[7hr x$59.06/hr]_$453.00
Equipment: [1hr x$70/hr cost code 8332]4-[7hr x$14/hr cost code 8801]=$168.00
Total Cost=453+168=$621
Location#15 Road EM-388-53-.25[Paved]
Scope: Replace damaged asphalt[28T]and eroded shoulder aggregate[1611
Aggregate Cost: 16T x$33.70/7=$539.20
Repair Asphalt Pavement[use 7"thick]
Sawcut Pavement: 16LF+42LF+16=74LF x$3/LF=$222
Undassified Excavation[use CDOT code 203-00010$14.18/CY complete in place]:
42LF x 16LF x 0.58FT deep=390CF/27=14.44CY x$14.18/CY=$204.76
Install Asphalt Pavement[use CDOT code 403-33741$81.70/7]:
14.44CY x 1.97T/CY=28.5T use 29T x$81.70/T=$2,369.30
Traffic Control Estimate and small job adder: $1000
Mobilization/Demob Estimate:$1,500
Total Cost 540+222+205+2370+$1000+$1,500=$5,837
Location#16.1 Road EM-52-U585-.0[Paved]
Scope: Replace eroded shoulder aggregate[109T]
Cost: 109T x$33.70/T=$3,673.30
Location#16.2 Road EM-52-US85-.0[Paved]
Scope: Replace eroded shoulder aggregate[1.821]
Cost: 1.82T x$33.70/7=$60.66
Location#16.3 Road EM-52-US85-.0[Paved]
Scope: Replace eroded shoulder aggregate[1.821]
Cost: 1.82T x$33.70/T=$60.66
Location#16.4 Road EM-52-US85-.0[Paved]
Scope: Replace eroded shoulder aggregate[4.511
Cost 4.5T x$33.70/T=$151.65
Total Cost Location#16=3673.30+60.66+60.66+151.65=$3,946.27
Location#17 Road EM-Brantner-35th [Paved]
Note: The work completed at the time of inspection included removal of damaged roadway and embankment materials and filling of those damaged
areas up to the grade of the existing asphalt pavement. The work to be completed includes sawcutting the asphalt and removing material down to
the depth of the adjoining asphalt section[measured in the Evans PW at 4"thick]along with installation of new asphalt.
Location#17.1 Embankment southeast side of roadway
Scope: Replace eroded embankment aggregate[8841]
Aggregate Cost: 884T x$33.70/1-=$29,790.80
Location#17.2 Pavement washout southeast side of roadway[triangular in plan view]
Scope: Replace eroded aggregate base[531]
Aggregate Cost: 53T x$33.70/7=$1,786.10
Work Completed Total=$1,786.10
Work to be Completed:
Scope: Replace Asphalt Pavement[use 4"thick same as used in Evans PW on Brantner which was measured]
Sawcut Pavement: 9LF+16LF+22LF+9LF=56LF x$3/LF=$168
Unclassified Excavation[use CDOT code 203-00010$14.18/CY complete in place]:
38LF x 9LF x 0.33FT deep=112.86CF/27=4.18CY x$14.18/CY=$59.27
Install Asphalt Pavement use CDOT code 403-33741$81.70/7]:
4.18CY x 1.97T/CY=8.23T use 9T x$81.70/1-=$735.30
Work to be Completed Total=$962.57
Location#17.3 Pavement washout full width of roadway[rectangular in plan view]
Scope: Replace eroded aggregate base[1321]
Aggregate Cost: 132T x$33.70/7=$4,448.40
Work Completed Total=$4,448.40
Work to be Completed:
Scope: Replace Asphalt Pavement[use 4"thick]
Sawcut Pavement: 21 LF+21 LF=42LF x$3/LF=$126
Undassified Excavation[use CDOT code 203-00010$14.18/CY complete in place]:
17LF x 21LF x 0.33FT deep=117.81 CF/27=4.36CY x$14.18/CY=$61.82
Install Asphalt Pavement[use CDOT code 403-33741 $81.70/7]:
4.36CY x 1.97T/CY=8.6T use 9T x$81.70/7=$735.30
Work to be Completed Total=$923.12
Location#17.4 Pavement washout east half of roadway[rectangular in plan view]
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emmie/,DanaInfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 23 of 33
Scope: Replace eroded aggregate base[1921]
Aggregate Cost: 192T x$33.70/T=$6,470.40
Work Completed Total=$6,470.40
Work to be Completed:
Scope: Replace Asphalt Pavement[use 4"thick]
Sawcut Pavement: 12LF+48LF+12LF=72LF x$3/LF=$216
Unclassified Excavation[use CDOT code 203-00010$14.18/CY complete in place]:
48LF x 12LF x 0.33FT deep=190.08CF/27=7.04CY x$14.18/CY=$99.83
Install Asphalt Pavement[use CDOT code 403-33741$81.70/T]:
7.04CY x 1.97T/CY=13.87T use 14T x$81.70/T=$1,143.80
Work to be Completed Total=$1,459.63
Location#17.5 Pavement washout full width of roadway[rectangular in plan view]
Scope: Replace eroded aggregate base[1014T]
Aggregate Cost: 1014T x$33.7011=$34,171.80
Work Completed Total=$34,171.80
Work to be Completed:
Scope: Replace Asphalt Pavement[use 4°thick]
Sawcut Pavement: 21 LF+21 LF=42LF x$3/LF=$126
Unclassified Excavation[use CDOT code 203-00010$14.18/CY complete in place]:
132LF x 21LF x 0.33FT deep=914.76CF/27=33.BBCY x$14.18/CY=$480.42
Install Asphalt Pavement[use CDOT code 403-33741 581.70/7]:
33.88CY x 1.97T/CY=66.74T use 67T x$81.70/T=$5,473.90
Work to be Completed Total=$6,080.32
Location#17.6 Pavement washout portion of east half of roadway[rectangular in plan view]
Scope: Replace eroded aggregate base[1221]
Aggregate Cost: 122T x$33.70/T=$4,111.40
Work Completed Total=$4,111.40
Work to be Completed:
Scope: Replace Asphalt Pavement[use 4"thick]
Sawcut Pavement: 8LF+49LF+8LF=65LF x$3/LF=$195
Unclassified Excavation[use COOT code 203-00010$14.18/CY complete in place]:
49LF x BLF x 0.33FT deep=129.36CF/27=4.79CY x$14.18/CY=$67.92
Install Asphalt Pavement[use CDOT code 403-33741 $81.7011]:
4.79CY x 1.97T/CY=9.44T use 10T x$81.70/T=$817.00
Work to be Completed=$1,079.92
Location#17.7 Pavement washout full width of roadway[rectangular in plan view]
Scope: Replace eroded aggregate base[7171]
Aggregate Cost: 717T x$33.70/T=$24,162.90
Work Completed Total=$24,162.90
Work to be Completed:
Scope. Replace Asphalt Pavement[use 4"thick]
Sawcut Pavement: 21LF+21LF=42LF x$3/LF=$126
Unclassified Excavation[use COOT code 203-00010$14.18/CY complete in place]:
94LF x 21LF x 0.33FT deep=651.42CF/27=24.13CY x$14.18/CY=$342.16
Install Asphalt Pavement[use CDOT code 403-33741 581.70/1]:
24.13CY x 1.97T/CY=47.54T use 48T x$81.7011=$3,921.60
Work to be Completed Total=$4,389.76
Total Cost Location 17[Paved]
Work Completed:
Aggregate replacement=29,790.80+1,786.10+4,448.40+6,470.40+34,171.80+4,111.40+24,162.90=$104,941.80
Work Completed Total=$104,941.80
Work to be Completed:
Pavement replacement:
Sawcut=168+126+216+126+195+126=$957
Unclassified Excavation=59.27+61.82+99,83+480.42+67.92+342.16=$1,111.42
Install Asphalt=735.30+735.30+1143.80+5473.90+817+3921.60=$12,826.90
Work to be Completed Total=957+1111.42+12826.90=$14,895.32
Location#18 Road EM-52-35-1.4[49th Street—from Brantner intersection southwest]
Scope: Work at this location is covered under a separate PW. See PW Ref#EVANS09 EMMIE#00302.
Cost: $0.00
Location#19 Road EM-46-25-0 [Detour Route between Hwy 60 and CR25]
Scope: Replace eroded road surface and embankment aggregate[634T]. Apply magnesium chloride[5000 gal]since it was used as a detour route
[incidental to the permanent work]. Based on discussions with the road foreman,there were 6 loads of aggregate at the intersection of Hwy 60 and
CR25 on the southem embankment and 17 loads of aggregate on the roadway from Hwy 60 west toward CR25 approximately 3700 feet. This
section was sprayed with magnesium chloride twice since it was a detour route. The Applicant indicated an application rate of 5,000 gallons/mile
each time,approximately 10,000 gallons were placed on the section between Hwy 60 and CR25 which is 1 mile.
Aggregate Cost: 634T x$33.70/T=$21,365.80
Magnesium Chloride Cost: 10,000 gal x$0.55/gal=$5,500.00
Work Completed Total Cost: $21,365.80+$5,500=$26,865.80
Location#20 Road EM-46-23-.9 [Detour Route between CR23 and CR25]
Scope: Replace eroded road surface aggregate[1787]. Apply magnesium chloride[2 passes at 5000 gallons each=10000 gal]since this was
used as a detour route[incidental to the permanent work]. Based on discussions with the road foreman,6 loads of aggregate were placed on the
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 24 of 33
section of roadway between CR23 and CR25. The applicant indicated that the application rate of magnesium chloride is approximately 5,000
gallons/mile and it was applied twice. Therefore the segment between CR23 and CR25 would have 10,000 gallons placed since the distance is 1
mile.]
Aggregate Cost: 17BT x$33.70/T=$5,998.60
Magnesium Chloride Cost: 10000 gal x$0.55/gal=$5,500.00
Work Completed Total: $5,998.60+$5,500=$11,498.60
Location#21 Road EM-129.5-127-.2 [Actual Description. EM-129-127,7-.2 on Rd 94]
Scope: Replace eroded road surface and embankment aggregate[112T]
Work Completed Cost. 112T x$33.70/7=$3,774.40
WORK COMPLETED SUMMARY:
Aggregate: 7499.14 Tons at a cost of$252,721.02
Magnesium Chloride: 20,275 gallons at a cost of$11,151.25
Asphalt: 29Tons at a cost of$5,837.00
Work Completed Total=$269,709.27
WORK TO BE COMPLETED SUMMARY:
Asphalt 157Tons at a cost of$14,895.32
Work to be Completed Total=$14,895.32
PROJECT NOTES:
1. Following the September 2013 flooding,applicant used contract services and/or force account resources to re-open roads/bridges and repair
damage as soon as possible. At several damage sites,repairs appear to have returned the facility to its pre-disaster design,function and capacity
with no known remaining work to be completed. However at other sites due to the onset of winter conditions,applicant was unable to complete the
restoration,thus leaving work to be completed. Finally,at some sites,applicant has expressed concern that unanticipated work may be still be
required as a result of conditions beyond their control,such as possible subsequent settlement resulting from saturated soil conditions following the
flood or where high water levels or erosion/deposition prevented a complete damage assessment.
2. This PW addresses all validated flood related damages at the specified site(s),including completed work and work to be completed(which
damages were known to the applicant and reported to FEMA by the effective date of this P . In the event that applicant identifies subsequent,
currently unknown flood related damage at such site(s),applicant is advised to contact the State of Colorado Office of Emergency Management to
report the damage and request an inspection prior to its repair. In the event that the State validates the damage as a direct result of the September
2013 flooding,the State will request FEMA prepare a version of this PW to address the eligible cost of repair,
3. Pursuant to 44 CFR 13 42,Grantees and Subgrantees are required to retain records,including source documentation,to support
expenditures/costs incurred against the grant award,for 3 years from the date of submission to FEMA of the final Financial Status Report.
4. The applicant must obtain all required federal,state,and local permits prior to the commencement of work.
5. The subgrantee is requesting direct administrative costs that are directly chargeable to this specific project. Associated eligible work is related to
administration of the PA project only and in accordance with 44 CFR 13.22. These costs are treated consistently and uniformly as direct costs in all
federal awards and other subgrantee activities and are not included in any approved indirect costs.
6. Project was reviewed for 406 Hazard Mitigation and a copy of 406 HMP proposal is attached with this project.
7. The applicant is aware that all projects are subject to an insurance review as stated in 44 C.F.R.Sections 206.252 and 206.253.If applicable,an
insurance determination will be made either as anticipated proceeds or actual proceeds in accordance with the applicant's insurance policy that may
affect the total amount of the project.
8. The applicant is required to adhere to State and Federal Govemment Procurement rules and regulations and maintain adequate records to
support the basis for all purchasing of goods and materials and contracting services for projects approved under the Public Assistance program,as
stated in 44 CFR 13.36.The applicant has advised they have followed their normal procurement procedures.
9. Applicant has completed a substantial percentage of the work but will not have cost data available within the fourteen day Pocket Guide rule.Per
Field Operations Pocket Guide,Section 7,Cost Estimates,Page 26,if the applicant has not produced cost data within two weeks of the site
inspection,the Project Specialist will prepare the PW on the basis of an estimate for the work accomplished'.Applicant,CO State representative
and FEMA personnel jointly conducted all inspections and agreed to use CDOT costs for in-place costs to derive estimates on this project
worksheet Applicant understands that all actual support documentation,invoices,FA records,contract and proof of payment will be required for
final reconciliation and or closeout process.Attached is the CDOT average in-place cost for materials.
10. The cost of aggregate in-place was established using CDOT average in-place cost for materials dated May 17,2013. CDOT Code 304-06000
for Aggregate Base Course[Class 6]at a unit cost of$16.851T for greater than 50,0007 was multiplied by a factor of 2 to get the price used in this
PW of$33.70/T. The CDOT unit price was doubled due to a lack of economies of scale for the small jobs and remote locations that were covered
by this PW.
11.The county measures its quantities in terms of tons.Field measured quantities were computed in cubic yards.The Weld County Engineering
and Construction Critena document specifies materials densities of 1461bs/CF for Hot Mix Asphalt, 1351bs/CF for Aggregate Base Course,and
120Ibs/CF for fill material. The project specialist used these densities to compute conversion factors to apply to the cubic yard computations as
shown below:
Hot Mix Asphalt: [146lbs/CF x 27CF/CY]/20001bs/Ton=1.97 T/CY
Aggregate Base Course: [1351bs/CF x 27CF/CY1/2000lbs/Ton=1.82 T/CY
Fill material: [1201bs/CF x 27CF/CY]/20001bs/Ton=1.62 T/CY
For PW#WELCO08,the aggregate used by the Applicant to complete the repairs was either surface gravel or Class 6,therefore the Aggregate
Base Course conversion of 1.82T/CY was used.
Special Considerations included? `/Yes No
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 25 of 33
Does the Scope of Work change the pre-disaster conditions at
the site? Yes No
Hazard Mitigation proposal included? `/Yes No Is there insurance coverage on this facility? Yes I No
PROJECT COST
ITEM CODE NARRATIVE QUANTITY/UNIT UNIT PRICE COST
Version 0'*`
Work Completed
1 9999 Locations 1-21 1/LS $269,709.27 $269,709.27
Work To Be Completed
2 9999 Location 17 1/LS $ 14,895.32 $ 14,895.32
Direct Subgrantee Admin Cost
3 9901 Direct Administrative Costs 1/LS $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00
(Subgrantee)
4 0909 Hazard Mitigation Proposal 1/LS $26,999.91 $26,999.91
TOTAL COST $312,604.50
PREPARED BY Paul Hesse TITLE TAC Project Specialist SIGNATURE
APPLICANT REP. Roy Rudisill TITLE Director-OEM SIGNATURE
WELD(COUNTY) : PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00561
Conditions Information
Review Name Condition Type Condition Name Description Monitored Status
This review does not address all
federal, state and local requirements.
Acceptance of federal funding
Standard requires recipient to comply with all
Final Review Other(EHP) Condition#2 federal, state and local laws. Failure No Approved
to obtain all appropriate federal, state
and local environmental permits and
clearances may jeopardize federal
funding.
Any change to the approved scope of
Final Review Other(EHP) Standard work will require re-evaluation for No Approved
Condition#1 compliance with NEPA and other
•
Laws and Executive Orders.
Gravel/borrow materials for work to
National Historic be completed must be obtained from
Final Review Other(EHP) Preservation Act one of the following pre-approved No Approved
(NHPA) sources: (SHPO approved source,
CO Licensed Pit,commercial source,
contractor or county Stockpiles).
Applicant is responsible for
Executive Order coordinating with the local floodplain
Final Review Other(EHP) 11988- manager.All required permits should No Approved
Floodplains be maintained as part of the
permanent record.
Final Review Other(EHP) Standard If ground disturbing activities occur No Approved
Condition#3 during construction,applicant will
monitor ground disturbance and if
any potential archeological resources
are discovered,will immediately
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 26 of 33
WELD(COUNTY) : PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00561
Conditions Information
cease construction in that area and
notify the State and FEMA.
The applicant should implement
appropriate FWS conservation
measures identified in the
Emergency Consultation between
FEMA and USFWS, dated
Endangered September 24,2013,to the extent
Final Review Other(EHP) Species Act Possible; including apost-
No Approved
(ESA) construction estimate of the amount
of habitat affected by the emergency
response, an evaluation of how
conservation recommendations were
implemented, and the results of
implementation in minimizing
adverse effects.
Final Review Other(EHP) Endangered PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION: 7. No Approved
Species Act Contact the Service immediately by
(ESA) telephone at(303)236-4773 if a
Preble's is found alive, dead, injured,
or hibernating within the project area.
Please also contact the Service if any
other listed species are found within
the project area. 8.To the maximum
extent practicable,limit disturbing
(e.g., crushing,trampling)or
removing (e.g., cutting, clearing)all
vegetation, such as willows,trees,
shrubs, and grasses within riparian
and adjacent upland habitats. a.
Restrict the temporary or permanent
removal of vegetation to the footprint
of the project area. b. Minimize the
use of heavy machinery and use
smaller equipment when possible. c.
Soil compaction:Temporarily line
access routes with geotextiles or
other materials,especially in wet,
unstable soils to protect roots and the
seed bank.9. Use the attached table
to track the acres or square feet of
riparian and upland habitats
temporarily or permanently affected
by the response activities. a.
Temporary Impacts: Native
vegetation and habitats will
reestablish following rehabilitation
(e.g., access route that is
rehabilitated with native,weed-free
seeds and plants). b. Permanent
Impacts: Riparian or upland habitats
will not return as a result of project
activities(e.g., road surface, concrete
footings) 10.Track the volumes of
any water from onsite sources stored
or used for dust abatement, soil
compaction, concrete mixing, or
other activities. 11. Locate, store,
stage,operate,and refuel equipment
https://connectl.dhs.gov/emm ie/,DanaInfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 27 of 33
WELD(COUNTY) : PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00561
Conditions Information
outside of riparian or adjacent upland
habitats. a. Operate equipment from
previously disturbed or modified
roadbeds or road shoulders above
the riparian habitats. b. Limit the
number of entrance and exit points
leading into the project area. c.
Stockpile topsoil and debris outside
the riparian corridor and protect from
stream flows or runoff. 12. During the
Preble's active season(May 1
through November 1),work only
during daylight hours to avoid
disrupting Preble's nocturnal
activities. 13. Promptly remove waste
to minimize site disturbance and
avoid attracting predators. 14. Cover
exposed holes or piles of loose dirt
with boards,tarps,or other materials
to prevent entrapment. 15. Use best
management practices (BMPs)to
limit construction-related disturbance,
such as soil compaction, erosion,
and sedimentation, and to prevent
the spread of invasive weeds; a. Soil
compaction: Establish one access
route for workers,vehicles, and
machinery, preferably along a
previously disturbed surface or route.
b. Soil compaction: Temporarily line
access routes with geotextiles or
other materials, especially in wet,
unstable soils. c. Weed control:
Wash and inspect vehicles and
equipment before entering or leaving
the project area so that they are free
of noxious weed seeds and plant
parts. d.Weed control: Use only
weed free certified materials,
including gravel, sand,top soil, seed,
and mulch. 16. Complete
construction before beginning
restoration or enhancement activities.
Final Review Other(EHP) Endangered PRE-CONSTRUCTION DESIGN: 1. No Approved
Species Act Design the project to avoid and
(ESA) minimize the permanent and
temporary impacts to riparian and
adjacent upland habitats. a. Before
construction, identify and prioritize
riparian and adjacent upland habitats
within the project area. Design the
project so that it avoids these
habitats whenever possible. b.
Minimize the amount of concrete,
riprap, bridge footings, and other
"hard,"impermeable engineering
features within the stream channel
and riparian or adjacent upland
habitats. c. Use bioengineering
https://connect 1.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 28 of 33
WELD(COUNTY) : PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00561
Conditions Information
techniques to stabilize stream banks.
d. Minimize the number and footprint
of access routes, staging areas, and
work areas. e. Locate access routes,
staging areas, and work areas within
previously disturbed or modified non-
habitat areas.f. Maintain habitat
connectivity under bridges or through
culverts by installing ledges or dry
culverts adjacent to the culverts with
water flow. g.Avoid fragmenting
linear riparian corridors. 2. Install
limits of work fencing (e.g.,orange
barrier netting or silt fencing),
signage,or other visible markers to
delineate access routes and the
project area from habitats. Use this
fencing to enforce no-entry zones. 3.
Hold a preconstruction briefing for
onsite personnel to explain the limits
of work and other conservation
measures.4. Follow regional
stormwater guidelines and design
best management practices(BMPs)
to control contamination,erosion,
and sedimentation, such as silt
fences, silt basins,gravel bags, and
other controls needed to stabilize
soils in denuded or graded areas,
during and after construction. 5.
Locate utilities along existing road
corridors, and if possible,within the
roadway or road shoulder. a. Bury
overhead utilities whenever possible.
b. Directionally bore utilities and
pipes underneath habitats.6.
Develop and implement a habitat
restoration plan that addresses site
preparation, planting techniques,
control of non-native weeds, native
seed mixtures, and post-construction
monitoring.
Final Review Other(EHP) Endangered POST-CONSTRUCTION: 17. Upon No Approved
Species Act project completion, revegetate all
(ESA) disturbed areas with native shrubs,
trees,and grasses. a. Rip compacted
access routes prior to replanting with
native vegetation. b. Fill and reseed
with weed free material and native
seed mixtures. c. Consult the Service
before finalizing a seed and plant list.
18. Bury riprap,then plant with native
riparian vegetation. 19. Rehabilitate
adjacent habitats impacted by
floodwaters to restore connectivity
and prevent future impacts from
erosion or sedimentation.20.
Consider monitoring the revegetated
areas for success.The Service can
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 29 of 33
WELD(COUNTY) : PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00561
Conditions Information
help establish success criteria during
the consultation process.
If ground disturbing activities occur
during construction, applicant will
Standard monitor ground disturbance and if
EHP Review Other(EHP) Condition#3 any potential archeological resources No Recommended
are discovered,will immediately
cease construction in that area and
notify the State and FEMA.
This review does not address all
federal, state and local requirements.
Acceptance of federal funding
Standard requires recipient to comply with all
EHP Review Other(EHP) Condition#2 federal,state and local laws. Failure No Recommended
to obtain all appropriate federal, state
and local environmental permits and
clearances may jeopardize federal
funding.
Any change to the approved scope of
EHP Review Other(EHP) Standard work will require re-evaluation for No Recommended
Condition#1 compliance with NEPA and other
Laws and Executive Orders.
Gravel/borrow materials for work to
National Historic be completed must be obtained from
EHP Review Other(EHP) Preservation Act one of the following pre approved No Recommended
(NHPA) sources: (SHPO approved source,
CO Licensed Pit, commercial source,
contractor or county Stockpiles).
Applicant is responsible for
Executive Order coordinating with the local floodplain
EHP Review Other(EHP) 11988- manager.All required permits should No Recommended
Floodplains be maintained as part of the
permanent record.
POST-CONSTRUCTION: 17. Upon
project completion, revegetate all
disturbed areas with native shrubs,
trees, and grasses. a. Rip compacted
access routes prior to replanting with
native vegetation. b. Fill and reseed
with weed free material and native
seed mixtures. c. Consult the Service
Endangered before finalizing a seed and plant list.
EHP Review Other(EHP) Species Act 18. Bury riprap,then plant with native No Recommended
(ESA) riparian vegetation. 19. Rehabilitate
adjacent habitats impacted by
floodwaters to restore connectivity
and prevent future impacts from
erosion or sedimentation. 20.
Consider monitoring the revegetated
areas for success. The Service can
help establish success criteria during
the consultation process.
EHP Review Other(EHP) Endangered The applicant should implement No Recommended
Species Act appropriate FWS conservation
(ESA) measures identified in the
Emergency Consultation between
FEMA and USFWS, dated
https://connect 1.dhs.gov/emm ie/,DanaInfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 30 of 33
WELD(COUNTY) : PA-06-CO4145-PW-00561
Conditions Information
September 24,2013,to the extent
possible; including a post-
construction estimate of the amount
of habitat affected by the emergency
response,an evaluation of how
conservation recommendations were
implemented, and the results of
implementation in minimizing
adverse effects.
EHP Review Other(EHP) Endangered PRE-CONSTRUCTION DESIGN: 1. No Recommended
Species Act Design the project to avoid and
(ESA) minimize the permanent and
temporary impacts to riparian and
adjacent upland habitats. a. Before
construction, identify and prioritize
riparian and adjacent upland habitats
within the project area. Design the
project so that it avoids these
habitats whenever possible. b.
Minimize the amount of concrete,
riprap, bridge footings,and other
"hard," impermeable engineering
features within the stream channel
and riparian or adjacent upland
habitats. c. Use bioengineering
techniques to stabilize stream banks.
d. Minimize the number and footprint
of access routes, staging areas, and
work areas. e. Locate access routes,
staging areas, and work areas within
previously disturbed or modified non-
habitat areas.f. Maintain habitat
connectivity under bridges or through
culverts by installing ledges or dry
culverts adjacent to the culverts with
water flow. g.Avoid fragmenting
linear riparian corridors. 2. Install
limits of work fencing (e.g., orange
barrier netting or silt fencing),
signage,or other visible markers to
delineate access routes and the
project area from habitats. Use this
fencing to enforce no-entry zones. 3.
Hold a preconstruction briefing for
onsite personnel to explain the limits
of work and other conservation
measures.4. Follow regional
stormwater guidelines and design
best management practices(BMPs)
to control contamination,erosion,
and sedimentation,such as silt
fences, silt basins,gravel bags, and
other controls needed to stabilize
soils in denuded or graded areas,
during and after construction. 5.
Locate utilities along existing road
corridors, and if possible,within the
roadway or road shoulder. a. Bury
overhead utilities whenever possible.
https://connect 1.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 31 of 33
WELD(COUNTY) : PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00561
Conditions Information
b. Directionally bore utilities and
pipes underneath habitats. 6.
Develop and implement a habitat
restoration plan that addresses site
preparation, planting techniques,
control of non-native weeds, native
seed mixtures, and post-construction
monitoring.
EHP Review Other(EHP) Endangered PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION: 7. No Recommended
Species Act Contact the Service immediately by
(ESA) telephone at(303)236-4773 if a
Preble's is found alive,dead, injured,
or hibernating within the project area.
Please also contact the Service if any
other listed species are found within
the project area. 8.To the maximum
extent practicable, limit disturbing
(e.g., crushing,trampling)or
removing (e.g., cutting, clearing)all
vegetation, such as willows,trees,
shrubs, and grasses within riparian
and adjacent upland habitats. a.
Restrict the temporary or permanent
removal of vegetation to the footprint
of the project area. b. Minimize the
use of heavy machinery and use
smaller equipment when possible. c.
Soil compaction:Temporarily line
access routes with geotextiles or
other materials,especially in wet,
unstable soils to protect roots and the
seed bank. 9. Use the attached table
to track the acres or square feet of
riparian and upland habitats
temporarily or permanently affected
by the response activities.a.
Temporary Impacts: Native
vegetation and habitats will
reestablish following rehabilitation
(e.g., access route that is
rehabilitated with native,weed-free
seeds and plants). b. Permanent
Impacts: Riparian or upland habitats
will not return as a result of project
activities(e.g., road surface, concrete
footings) 10.Track the volumes of
any water from onsite sources stored
or used for dust abatement, soil
compaction,concrete mixing,or
other activities. 11. Locate, store,
stage, operate, and refuel equipment
outside of riparian or adjacent upland
habitats. a. Operate equipment from
previously disturbed or modified
roadbeds or road shoulders above
the riparian habitats. b. Limit the
number of entrance and exit points
leading into the project area.c.
Stockpile topsoil and debris outside
https://connectl.dhs.gov/emm ie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 32 of 33
WELD(COUNTY) : PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00561
Conditions Information
the riparian corridor and protect from
stream flows or runoff. 12. During the
Preble's active season(May 1
through November 1),work only
during daylight hours to avoid
disrupting Preble's nocturnal
activities. 13. Promptly remove waste
to minimize site disturbance and
avoid attracting predators. 14. Cover
exposed holes or piles of loose dirt
with boards,tarps,or other materials
to prevent entrapment. 15. Use best
management practices(BMPs)to
limit construction-related disturbance,
such as soil compaction, erosion,
and sedimentation, and to prevent
the spread of invasive weeds;a. Soil
compaction: Establish one access
route for workers,vehicles, and
machinery, preferably along a
previously disturbed surface or route.
b. Soil compaction:Temporarily line
access routes with geotextiles or
other materials,especially in wet, II
unstable soils. c.Weed control:
Wash and inspect vehicles and
equipment before entering or leaving
the project area so that they are free
of noxious weed seeds and plant
parts. d.Weed control: Use only
weed free certified materials,
including gravel, sand,top soil, seed,
and mulch. 16. Complete
construction before beginning
restoration or enhancement activities.
Internal Comments
No. Queue User Date/Time Reviewer Comments
Award SYSTEM 03-03-2014 11:45
5 ACCEPTED
Review PM GMT
Note: Applicant, CO State representative and FEMA personnel
jointly conducted all inspections and agreed to use CDOT costs
for in-place costs to derive estimates on this project
worksheet.Final Reviewer finds eligible the application and
PALACIO 02-26-2014 10:14 approves the funding of this CAT-C project worksheet based on
4 Final Review JOSE PM GMT the applicant having performed all required procurement
procedures, perform all required special considerations
recommendations such as permits to address EHP
considerations and securing all actual cost documentation for
the financial reconciliation of this project. Task Force Leader-
J. Palacio 02/26/2014
3 EHP Review EAKINS 02-25-2014 02:21 Cat C,95%complete. Weld County,Weld County. Applicant
WYNN PM GMT used force account labor,equipment,and materials and
contracted for hauling costs to repair flood caused
embankment erosion and washout of road base and aggregate
surfacing at 21 sites on county roads including replacing road
surface material, re-grading and replacing and embankment
aggregate, replace aggregate base material,replacing asphalt
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emmie/,DanaInfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 33 of 33
Internal Comments
No. Queue User Date/Time Reviewer Comments
pavement, and applying magnesium chloride to roads used as
detour routes. Mitigation: Applicant proposes to install rip rap
and top with 8 inch soil cover and grass seed at Site 17.1 and
Site 19 to reduce future damages. -cwalz123-02/21/2014
16:57:23 GMT
Project site work is not in a mapped wetland.-cwalz123-
02/21/2014 18:23:54 GMT
The entire community will benefit from the completion of this
project.-cwalz123-02/21/2014 18:24:04 GMT
Action is addressed under the attached Emergency
Consultation between FEMA and USFWS, dated September
24,2013.The consultation includes conservation measures
intended to minimize impacts to the federally listed Preble's
Meadow Jumping Mouse, Ute's Lady's Tress and Colorado
Butterfly Bush, and Designated Critical Habitat protected under
the ESA.-cwalz123-02/21/2014 16:59:16 GMT
Change 8-step attachement to a pdf document. FIRM numbers
for sites 14 and 17 should be changed:Site 14-0802660637C
and Site 17-0802660638C.
Sites 1,2, 3 are located on a non-printed panel number
0802660175C. Site 4 is located on a non-printed panel number
0802660350C. Per FIRM 0802660325C dated 09/28/1982,
Sites 5, 6 are located in Zone X. Sites 7, 8, 9 are located on a
non-printed panel number 080266052C. Per FIRM
0802660475D dated 09/22/1999, Site 11 is in Zone X. Per
FIRM 0802660675C dated 09/28/1982, Site 10 is in Zone X.
Per FIRM 0802660645C dated 9/28/82, Site 12 is in Zone X.
Per Firm 0802660639C dated 09/28/1982, Site 14 is in Zone
A4. Per FIRM 0802660645C dated 09/28/1982, Site 15 is in
Zone A. Per FIRM 0802660638C dated 9/28/82 Site 16 is in
Zone A7. Per FIRM 0801820001B dated 4/2/79, Site 17 is in
Zone A7. Per FIRM 0802660750C dated 9/28/82, Sites 19, 20
are in Zone A. Site 21 is located on a non-printed panel number
0802660425C. Per 44 CFR Part 9.5(g). Steps 1,4,5,and 8 of
8-Step review completed. See attached.-cwalz123-
02/21/2014 18:22:52 GMT
The scope of work has been reviewed and meets the criteria of
the 2013 signed Programmatic Agreement, Item III; Section A,
B agreed to by FEMA and the SHPO.-cwalz123-02/21/2014
16:57:40 GMT
2 Mitigation DROST 02-21-2014 03:31 The Hazard Mitigation Proposal is approved-Brian W. Drost,
Review BRIAN PM GMT 406 Specialist
Insurance GILLIAM 02-19-2014 02:57 Applicant's property insurance specifically excludes roadways
1 Review ROBERT PM GMT from coverage. Insurance proceeds are not anticipated and
there is no insurance O&M for road projects.
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,S SL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 1 of 16
U)
PX-084O-4145-PW-00574(0) P
Applicant Name: Application Title:
WELD(COUNTY) WELCO15-CR 58
Period of Performance Start: Period of Performance End:
09-14-2013 03-14-2015
Subgrant Application - Entire Application
Application Title: WELCO15-CR 58
Application Number: PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00574(0)
Application Type: Subgrant Application(PW)
Preparer Information
Prefix
First Name KATHLEEN
Middle Initial
Last Name RUVARAC
Title PROJECT SPECIALIST
Agency/Organization Name FEMA
Address 1 9200 EAST MINERAL AVE.
Address 2
City CENTENNIAL
State CO
Zip 80112
Email Deanna.Butterbaugh@state.co.us
Is the application preparer the Point of Contact? No
Point of Contact Information
Prefix
First Name Roy
Middle Initial
Last Name Rudisill
Title Director-OEM
Agency/Organization Director-OEM
Address 1 PO BOX 758
Address 2
City Greeley
State CO
ZIP 80632
Phone 970-3046540
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 2 of 16
Fax
Email rrudisill@weldgov.com
Alternate Point of Contact Information
Prefix
First Name
Middle Initial
Last Name
Title
Agency/Organization
Address 1
Address 2
City
State
ZIP
Phone
Fax
Email
Project Description
Disaster Number: 4145
Pre-Application Number: PA-08-CO-4145-RPA-0088
Applicant ID: 123-99123-00
Applicant Name: WELD (COUNTY)
Subdivision:
Project Number: WELCO15
Standard Project Number/Title: 399- Road System Damage
Please Indicate the Project Type: Neither Alternate nor Improved
Application Title: WELCO15- CR 58
Category: C.ROADS& BRIDGES
Percentage Work Completed? 95.0%
As of Date: 11-19-2013
Comments
Attachments
Damage Facilities (Part 1 of 2)
Facility Site
Number Facility Name Address County City State ZIP Previously Action
Damaged?
1 CR 58 near South Platte River Weld CO No
2 BRIDGE 58-47A OVER PATTERSON DITCH Weld CO No
Comments
https://connect I.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 3 of 16
Attachments
User Date Document Description Hard Copy File File Name Action
Type Reference
SHIRLEY 02-07- LOCATION WELCO15_Location
SANDERS 2014 Map mAP Map_CR58.pdf(133.93 kb) View
BROWN
SHIRLEY 02-07-
SANDERS 2014 Photos PHOTOS Applicant Photos.pdf(7.46 Mb) View
BROWN
SHIRLEY 02-07- CR 58 near South Platte River
SANDERS 2014 Photos PHOTOS Photo Sheet 01.pdf(135.23 kb) View
BROWN
SHIRLEY 02-07- CR 58 near South Platte River
SANDERS 2014 Photos PHOTOS Photo Sheet 02.pdf(62.54 kb) View
BROWN
Facility Name: CR 58 near South Platte River
Address 1:
Address 2:
County: Weld
City:
State: CO
ZIP:
Was this site previously damaged? No
Percentage Work Completed? 95.00%
PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00574(0):
GPS 40.40833-104.61388
Location:
Damage Description and Dimensions: PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00574(0):
Damage Description and Dimensions
During the incident period of September 11, 2013 to September 30, 2013,
Weld County, Colorado received heavy rainfall and debris in the creeks,
streams and rivers which caused damage to numerous roads and bridges
in Weld County. This project worksheet addresses damages to CR 58 east
of South Platte River and Bridge 58-47A over Patterson Ditch, in Section
12, T5N, R65W.
On November 19, 2013, Kathleen Ruvarac, FEMA TAC Bridge Specialist,
David Ray, FEMA Hazard Mitigation Specialist, Gary Moore, FEMA
Environmental, Historical, Preservation Specialist, and Donald Dunker,
Weld County Public Works Engineer, performed a site investigation at this
location to document damages. The road and bridge was open and repairs
completed at the time of inspection.
Location 1
CR 58 east of South Platte River, Category C, Permanent Road Repair
Lat: N40.40833
Long: -W104.61388
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=i source.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 4 of 16
Flooding of South Platte River resulted in damages on CR 58 include
washout of asphalt, roadway base and embankment material on the
westbound travel lane and adjacent shoulder.
Embankment Material lost in roadway void in the westbound travel lane
measuring 254 ft in length x 12 ft in width x 3 ft in depth=338.7 CY and on
north shoulder measuring 254 ft in length x 17 ft in width x 3 ft in depth
=479.8 CY, totaling 818.5 CY.
One asphalt patch on roadway measured 254 ft in length x 12 ft in width =
3,048 SF x 0.5 ft in depth= 1,524 CF x 146 LB/CF x 1 ton/2000 LB = 111.3
TNS asphalt.
Ditch cleaning each side of the road at the site is estimated to be 375 ft in
length on the north shoulder and 325 ft in length on the south shoulder
adjacent to the travel lanes, totaling 700 LF.
PA-08-CO-4145-P W-00574(0):
WORK TO BE COMPLETED
Location 1
1 —Fill void in roadway travel lane, embankment and north shoulder—
818.5 CY x 1.82 (Conversion Factor CY ABC Class 6 Material to Tons=
1,489.7 tons x$33.70/ton (CDOT Item Number 304-06000 Aggregate Base
Course Class 6 x 2 due to economies of scale as compared with number of
CDOT annual projects) =$50,201.88
Scope of Work: 2—Install asphalt on roadway westbound travel lane = 111.3 tons x
$81.70/ton (CDOT Item Number 403-33741 Hot Bituminous Pavement
(Grading S) (75) (PG 64-22) = $9,093.21
3—Ditch cleaning each side of roadway=700 LF x$3.40/LF All material
was re-used on the road shoulder.(FEMA Cost Code 3070 Ditch Cleaning
and shaping) = $2,380.00
Total Location 1 = $61,675.09
Hazard Mitigation Proposal
• Is effective mitigation feasible on this site? I Yes
If you answered Yes to the above question, the next question is required
Will mitigation be performed on this site? 'Yes
If you answered Yes to the above question,the next question is required
Do you wish to attach a Hazard Mitigation Yes
Proposal?
If you answered Yes to the above question,the next two questions are required
Please provide the Scope of Work for the estimate: Work To Be Completed
(maximum 4000 characters! The applicant has indicated that the installation of turf
reinforcement mat on the roadside shoulders and
embankment slopes will re-direct channel flow across the
slopes reducing erosion at the facility and alleviating future
damages.
1) Turf Reinforcement Mat—254 ft in length x 19 ft in width
within the right of way=536.2 SY x 1.2 factor for toe in excess
of material =643.5 SY x$10.00/SY (CDOT Item Number 216-
00301) = $6,435.00
This HMP is considered cost effective per FEMA Disaster
Assistance Policy 9526.1, Section VII. B. 2. Certain mitigation
measures (Appendix A), determined cost effective, as long as
https://connect I.dhs.gov/emm ie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 5 of 16
the mitigation measure does not exceed 100%of the eligible
cost of the eligible repair work on the project.
Appendix A. 5. Gabion baskets, rip rap, sheet piling, and
geotextile fabric installation- installation to control erosion.
Location 1 —SOW Item#1 =$50,201.88
$6,435.00/$50,201.88 = 12.8%
The net cost of mitigation/cost of damages is 12.8% < 100%.
This HMP is for cost estimating purposes only. The Final
design is the obligation of the Applicant and/or their agent.
Would you like to add the Hazard Mitigation Yes
Proposal as a cost line item to the project cost?
GIS Coordinates
Project Location Latitude Longitude
CR 58 40.40833 -104.61388
Facility Name: BRIDGE 58-47A OVER PATTERSON DITCH
Address 1:
Address 2:
County: Weld
City:
State: CO
ZIP:
Was this site previously damaged? No
Percentage Work Completed? 95.00%
PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00574(0):
BRIDGE 58-47A OVER PATTERSON DITCH
Location:
Damage Description and Dimensions: PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00574(0):
Location 2
Bridge 58-47A over Patterson Ditch, Category C, Permanent Bridge Repair
Lat: N40.41003
Long:-W104.62029
Flooding of Patterson Ditch resulted in damages to Bridge 58-47A including
washout of asphalt, roadway base and embankment material on the east
and west approaches behind the backwalls and wingwalls.
The double span concrete bridge, 75 ft in length x 32 ft in width, traverses
the Patterson Ditch and consists of a concrete deck, one (1) concrete
intermediate pier and integral concrete backwall and wingwalls. Bridge
inspection reports were not provided by the applicant.
Material lost in first roadway patch on the east approach behind the
backwall is estimated to be 40 ft in length x 31 ft in width x 10 ft in depth
=459.3 CY.
Material lost in second roadway patch is estimated to be 18 ft in length x 7
ft in width x 3 ft in depth= 14.0 CY.
Material lost in third roadway patch is estimated to be 4 ft in length x 3 ft in
width x 3 ft in depth = 1.3 CY.
Total Material: 474.6 CY
One asphalt patch on roadway behind the east backwall measured 40 ft in
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 6 of 16
length x 31 ft in width = 1,240 SF x 0.5 ft in depth = 620 CF x 146 LB/CF x
1 ton/2000 LB =45.3 TNS asphalt
A second asphalt patch on roadway measured 18 ft in length x 7 ft in width
= 126 SF x 0.5 ft in depth =63 CF x 146 LB/CF x 1 ton/2000 LB =4.6 TNS
asphalt
A third asphalt patch on roadway measured 4 ft in length x 3 ft in width =
12 SF x 0.5 ft in depth =6 CF x 146 LB/CF x 1 ton/2000 LB=0.4 TNS
asphalt
Total Asphalt: 50.3 TNS
In addition, Rip Rap was washed away at each wingwall and is estimated
to be (15 ft in front of each wingwall x 4 wingwalls,totaling 60 ft in length x
5 ft in width towards the channel x 3 ft in depth = 33.3 CY.
The Applicant has provided pictures of the road and bridge facilities dated
9-15-2013 documenting damages. These photos are attached to this
project worksheet.
Scope of Work: PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00574(0):
Work To Be Completed
Location 2
1 —Structural Backfill behind east abutment backwall at first roadway patch
location—459.3 CY x$14.68/CY(CDOT Item Number 206-00100 Structural
Backfill) =$6,742.52
2- Fill voids in roadway travel lane in the second and third asphalt patch
locations— 15.3 CY x 1.82= 27.8 tons x$33.70/ton (CDOT Item Number
304-06000 Aggregate Base Course Class 6 x 2 due to economies of scale
as compared with number of CDOT annual projects) =$936.86
3- Install asphalt at three locations on the westbound travel lane =50.3
tons x$81.70/ton(CDOT Item Number 403-33741 Hot Bituminous
Pavement(Grading S) (75) (PG 64-22) =$4,109.51
4—Replace Rip-Rap in front of wingwalls—33.3 CY x$83.17/CY (CDOT
Item Number 506-00218 Rip Rap 18 inch) =$2,769.56
Total Location 2 =$14,558.45
Total: $76,223.54 cost estimate prepared by project specialist using 2013
CDOT Average Unit Prices
Project Notes
1. Following the September 2013 flooding, applicant used contract
services and/or force account resources to re-open roads/bridges and
repair damage as soon as possible. At several damage sites, repairs
appear to have returned the facility to its pre-disaster design,function and
capacity with no known remaining work to be completed. However at other
sites due to the onset of winter conditions, applicant was unable to
complete the restoration, thus leaving work to be completed. Finally, at
some sites, applicant has expressed concern that unanticipated work may
be still be required as a result of conditions beyond their control, such as
possible subsequent settlement resulting from saturated soil conditions
following the flood or where high water levels or erosion/deposition
prevented a complete damage assessment.
2. This PW addresses all validated flood related damages at the specified
site, including completed work and work to be completed (which damages
were known to the applicant and reported to FEMA by the effective date of
this P . In the event that applicant identifies subsequent, currently
unknown flood related damage at such site, applicant is advised to contact
the State of Colorado Office of Emergency Management to report the
damage and request an inspection prior to its repair. In the event that the
State validates the damage as a direct result of the September 2013
flooding, the State will request FEMA prepare a version of this PW to
https://connect 1.dhs.gov/emm ie/,Danaln fo=isource.fem a.net,SSL+dispatchDesti nation.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 7 of 16
address the eligible cost of repair. The Applicant will notify FEMA and the
State of their intent to perform permanent work related to this site before
any work commences in the field. Failure to do so may jeopardize the sub-
grant for permanent work related to the work in this sub-grant.
3. Applicant has completed a substantial percentage of the work but will
not have cost data available within the fourteen day Pocket Guide rule. Per
Field Operations Pocket Guide, Section 7, Cost Estimates, Page 26, "If the
applicant has not produced cost data within two weeks of the site
inspection, the Project Specialist will prepare the PW on the basis of an
estimate for the work accomplished".Applicant and FEMA personnel jointly
conducted all inspections and agreed to use CDOT costs for in-place costs
to derive estimates on this project worksheet. Applicant understands that all
actual support documentation, invoices, FA records, contract and proof of
payment will be required for final reconciliation and or closeout process.
Attached is the CDOT average in-place cost for materials.
4. The Applicant will notify FEMA and the State of their intent to perform
permanent work related to this site before any work commences in the
field. Failure to do so may jeopardize the sub-grant for permanent work
related to the work in this sub-grant.
5. Pursuant to 44 CFR 13.42, Grantees and Subgrantees are required to
retain records, including source documentation,to support
expenditures/costs incurred against the grant award, for 3 years from the
date of submission to FEMA of the final Financial Status Report.
6. The applicant must obtain all required federal, state, and local permits
prior to the commencement of work.
7. The subgrantee is requesting direct administrative costs that are
directly chargeable to this specific project. Associated eligible work is
related to administration of the PA project only and in accordance with 44
CFR 13.22. These costs are treated consistently and uniformly as direct
costs in all federal awards and other subgrantee activities and are not
included in any approved indirect costs.
8. Project was reviewed for 406 Hazard Mitigation and a 406 HMP
proposal is attached to this project worksheet.
9. The applicant is aware that all projects are subject to an insurance
review as stated in 44 C.F.R. Sections 206.252 and 206.253. If applicable,
an insurance determination will be made either as anticipated proceeds or
actual proceeds in accordance with the applicant's insurance policy that
may affect the total amount of the project.
10. The applicant is required to adhere to State and Federal Government
Procurement rules and regulations and maintain adequate records to
support the basis for all purchasing of goods and materials and contracting
services for projects approved under the Public Assistance program, as
PP P 9
stated in 44 CFR 13.36. The applicant has advised they have followed their
normal procurement procedures.
Hazard Mitigation Proposal
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 8 of 16
- Is effective mitigation feasible on this site? 'Yes
If you answered Yes to the above question,the next question is required
Will mitigation be performed on this site? Yes
If you answered Yes to the above question,the next question is required
Do you wish to attach a Hazard Mitigation Yes
Proposal?
If you answered Yes to the above question, the next two questions are required
Please provide the Scope of Work for the estimate: HMP ATTACHED
(maximum 4000 characters)
Would you like to add the Hazard Mitigation No
Proposal as a cost line item to the project cost?
GIS Coordinates
Project Location Latitude Longitude
BRIDGE 58-47A 40.41003 -104.62029
Special Considerations
1. Does the damaged facility or item of work have insurance coverage and/or is it an insurable No
risk(e.g., buildings, equipment, vehicles, etc)?
2. Is the damaged facility located within a floodplain or coastal high hazard area and/or does it Yes
have an impact on a floodplain or wetland?
If you would like to make any comments, please enter them below.
(maximum 4000 characters)
Location 1 -Zone B-Areas between limits of the 100 year flood and and 500 year flood; etc. Location 2-Zone C-
Areas of minimal flooding. Flood Map Panel 0802660637C dated September 28, 1982
3. Is the damaged facility or item of work located within or adjacent to a Coastal Barrier Resource No
System Unit or an Otherwise Protected Area?
4. Will the proposed facility repairs/reconstruction change the pre-disaster conditions(e.g., No
footprint, material, location, capacity, use of function)?
5. Does the applicant have a hazard mitigation proposal or would the applicant like technical Yes
assistance for a hazard mitigation proposal?
6. Is the damaged facility on the National Register of Historic Places or the state historic listing? No
Is it older than 50 years?Are there more, similar buildings near the site?
7. Are there any pristine or undisturbed areas on, or near,the project site?Are there large tracts No
of forestland?
8.Are there any hazardous materials at or adjacent to the damaged facility and/or item of work? No
9.Are there any other environmental or controversial issues associated with the damaged facility yes
and/or item of work?
If you would like to make any comments, please enter them below.
(maximum 4000 characters)
EHP to conduct review
Attachments
User Date Document Description Hard Copy File File Name Action
Type Reference
SHIRLEY SANDERS 02-07- Firmette.pdf(501.78
BROWN 2014 Floodplain FIRMETTET kb) View
For Category C, D, E, F,and G Projects only
https://connectl.dhs.gov/emm ie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SS L+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 9 of 16
Is effective mitigation feasible on this project? Yes
If you answered Yes to the above question, the next question is required
Will mitigation be performed on any sites in this Yes
project?
If you answered Yes to the above question,the next question is required
Do you wish to attach a Hazard Mitigation Yes
Proposal?
If you answered Yes to the above question,the next two questions are required
Work To Be Completed The applicant has indicated that the
installation of turf reinforcement mat on the roadside shoulders
and embankment slopes will re-direct channel flow across the
slopes reducing erosion at the facility and alleviating future
damages. 1) Turf Reinforcement Mat—254 ft in length x 19 ft in
width within the right of way= 536.2 SY x 1.2 factor for toe in
excess of material =643.5 SY x$10.00/SY (CDOT Item Number
216-00301) = $6,435.00 This HMP is considered cost effective
Please provide the Scope of Work per FEMA Disaster Assistance Policy 9526.1, Section VII. B. 2.
for the estimate: Certain mitigation measures (Appendix A), determined cost
effective, as long as the mitigation measure does not exceed
100% of the eligible cost of the eligible repair work on the project.
Appendix A. 5. Gabion baskets, rip rap, sheet piling, and
geotextile fabric installation-installation to control erosion.
Location 1 —SOW Item#1 =$50,201.88$6,435.00/$50,201.88 =
12.8%The net cost of mitigation/cost of damages is 12.8% <
100%. This HMP is for cost estimating purposes only. The Final
design is the obligation of the Applicant and/or their agent.
Would you like to add the Hazard Mitigation
Proposal as a cost line item to the project cost? Yes
Hazard Mitigation Proposal -0909
# Code Material and/or Description Unit Unit of Unit Price Subgrant Type Cost Estimate Action
Quantity Measure Budget Class
***Version 0***
1 9999 Turf reinforcement mat 643.5 SY $ 10.00 $6,435.00
Total Cost: $6,435.00
Comments
Attachments
User Date Document Description Hard Copy File File Name Action
Type Reference
SHIRLEY 02-07- Mitigation WELCOI5_EHP Email Approval of
SANDERS MITIGATION View
BROWN 2014 Document HMP.pdf(78.81 kb)
SHIRLEY Weld County CAT C CR 58 near
02-07- Mitigation
SANDERS MITIGATION South Platte River_HMP.docx View
BROWN 2014 Document (19.30 kb)
Cost Estimate
Is this Project Worksheet for
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emm ie/,Dana]nfo=isource.fema.net,S S L+dispatchDesti nation.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 10 of 16
(Preferred) Repair
Material Unit Unit of Subgrant Cost
Sequence Code and/or Quantity Measure Unit Price Budget Class Type Estimate Action
Description
***Version 0***
Work To Be Completed
Work To
1 9999 REPAIR 1 LS 76,223.54 CONSTRUCTION Be $76,223.54
Completed
Direct Work To
Administrative $ INDIRECT
2 9901 Costs 1 LS 1,000.00 CHARGES Be $ 1,000.00
(Subgrantee) Completed
Total Cost: $ 77,223.54
Insurance Adjustments(Deductibles, Proceeds and Settlements)-5900/5901
Subgrant
Sequence Code Material and/or Description Unit Unit of Unit Budget Type Cost Action
Quantity Measure Price Class Estimate
Total Cost: $ 0.00
Hazard Mitigation Proposal-0909
Subgrant
Sequence Code Material and/or Description Unit Unit of Unit Budget Type Cost Action
Quantity Measure Price Class Estimate
***Version 0***
1 19999 Turf reinforcement mat f 643.5 I SY 1 $ 10.001 I 1$6,435.00
Total Cost: $6,435.00
Total Cost Estimate: $ 83,658.54
(Preferred Estimate Type+Insurance Adjustments+Hazard Mitigation Proposal;
Comments
Attachments
User Date Document Description Hard Copy File File Name Action
Type Reference
SHIRLEY 02-07- Calculation CDOT COST OF Weld County-2013 CDOT
SANDERS 2014 Sheet MATERIAL Average Unit Prices.pdf View
BROWN (37.37 kb)
Existing Insurance Information
Insurance Type Policy No. Bldg/Property Content Insurance Deductible Years
Amount Amount Amount Amount Required
Comments
On file at JFO
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page I I of 16
Attachments
Comments and Attachments
Name of Section Comment Attachment
Preparer Information WeldCoBridgeFM0802660637C[11.pdf
WELCO15 Location Map CR58.pdf
Damage Facilities Applicant Photos.pdf
CR 58 near South Platte River Photo Sheet 01.pdf
CR 58 near South Platte River Photo Sheet 02.pdf
Special Considerations Firmette.pdf
Mitigation WELCO15 EHP Email Approval of HMP.pdt
Weld County CAT C CR 58 near South Platte River HMP.docx
Cost Estimate Weld County- 2013 COOT Average Unit Prices.pdf
Insurance Information On file at JFO
Form 90-91 Weld County CAT C CR 58 near South Platte River.docx
(Bundle Reference#(Amendment#) Date Awarded
PA-08-CO-4145-State-0035(34) 03-03-2014
Subgrant Application - FEMA Form 90-91
Note:The Effective Cost Share for this application is 75%
FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
PROJECT WORKSHEET
DISASTER PROJECT NO. PAID NO. DATE CATEGORY
WELCO15 123- 02-19-2014 C
FEMA 4145 - DR -CO 99123-00
APPLICANT:WELD(COUNTY) WORK COMPLETE AS OF:
11-19-2013:95%
Site 1 of 2
DAMAGED FACILITY:
COUNTY. Weld
CR 58 near South Platte River
LOCATION: LATITUDE: LONGITUDE:
40.40833 -104.61388
PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00574(0)
GPS 40.40833-104.61388
DAMAGE DESCRIPTION AND DIMENSIONS:
PA-08-CO-4145-P W-00574(0):
Damage Description and Dimensions
During the incident period of September 11,2013 to September 30,2013,Weld County,Colorado received heavy rainfall and debris in the
creeks,streams and rivers which caused damage to numerous roads and bridges in Weld County. This project worksheet addresses damages
to CR 58 east of South Platte River and Bridge 58-47A over Patterson Ditch,in Section 12,T5N,R65W.
On November 19,2013,Kathleen Ruvarac,FEMA TAC Bridge Specialist,David Ray, FEMA Hazard Mitigation Specialist,Gary Moore,FEMA
Environmental,Historical,Preservation Specialist,and Donald Dunker,Weld County Public Works Engineer,performed a site investigation at
this location to document damages. The road and bridge was open and repairs completed at the time of inspection.
Location 1
https://connectl.dhs.gov/emm ie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 12 of 16
CR 58 east of South Platte River,Category C, Permanent Road Repair
Lat:N40.40833
Long. -W104.61388
Flooding of South Platte River resulted in damages on CR 58 include washout of asphalt, roadway base and embankment material on the
westbound travel lane and adjacent shoulder.
Embankment Material lost in roadway void in the westbound travel lane measuring 254 ft in length x 12 ft in width x 3 ft in depth=338.7 CY and
on north shoulder measuring 254 ft in length x 17 ft in width x 3 ft in depth=479.8 CY,totaling 818.5 CY.
One asphalt patch on roadway measured 254 ft in length x 12 ft in width=3,048 SF x 0.5 ft in depth=1,524 CF x 146 LB/CF x 1 ton/2000 LB=
111.3 TNS asphalt
Ditch cleaning each side of the road at the site is estimated to be 375 ft in length on the north shoulder and 325 ft in length on the south
shoulder adjacent to the travel lanes,totaling 700 LF.
SCOPE OF WORK:
PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00574(0):
WORK TO BE COMPLETED
Location 1
1—Fill void in roadway travel lane,embankment and north shoulder—818.5 CY x 1.82(Conversion Factor CY ABC Class 6 Material to Tons=
1,489.7 tons x$33.70/ton(CDOT Item Number 304-06000 Aggregate Base Course Class 6 x 2 due to economies of scale as compared with
number of CDOT annual projects)=$50.201.88
2—Install asphalt on roadway westbound travel lane=111.3 tons x$81.70/ton(CDOT Item Number 403-33741 Hot Bituminous Pavement
(Grading S)(75)(PG 64-22)=$9,093.21
3—Ditch cleaning each side of roadway=700 LF x$3.40/LF All material was re-used on the road shoulder.(FEMA Cost Code 3070 Ditch
Cleaning and shaping)=$2,380.00
Total Location 1 =$61,675.09
Site 2 of 2
DAMAGED FACILITY:
COUNTY: Weld
BRIDGE 58-47A OVER PATTERSON DITCH
LOCATION: LATITUDE: LONGITUDE:
40.41003 -104.62029
PA-08-CO-4145-P W-00574(0):
BRIDGE 58-47A OVER PATTERSON DITCH
DAMAGE DESCRIPTION AND DIMENSIONS:
PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00574(0):
W-00574(0):
Location 2
Bridge 58-47A over Patterson Ditch,Category C, Permanent Bridge Repair
Lat N40.41003
Long.-W104.62029
Flooding of Patterson Ditch resulted in damages to Bridge 58-47A including washout of asphalt,roadway base and embankment material on
the east and west approaches behind the backwalls and wingwalls.
The double span concrete bridge,75 ft in length x 32 ft in width,traverses the Patterson Ditch and consists of a concrete deck,one(1)concrete
intermediate pier and integral concrete backwall and wingwalls. Bridge inspection reports were not provided by the applicant
Material lost in first roadway patch on the east approach behind the backwall is estimated to be 40 ft in length x 31 ft in width x 10 ft in depth
=459.3 CV.
Material lost in second roadway patch is estimated to be 18 ft in length x 7 ft in width x 3 ft in depth=14.0 CY.
Material lost in third roadway patch is estimated to be 4 ft in length x 3 ft in width x 3 ft in depth=1.3 CY.
Total Material: 474.6 CY
One asphalt patch on roadway behind the east backwall measured 40 ft in length x 31 ft in width=1,240 SF x 0.5 ft in depth=620 CF x 146
LB/CF x 1 ton/2000 LB=45.3 TNS asphalt
A second asphalt patch on roadway measured 18 ft in length x 7 ft in width= 126 SF x 0.5 ft in depth=63 CF x 146 LB/CF x 1 ton/2000 LB=
4.6 TNS asphalt
A third asphalt patch on roadway measured 4 ft in length x 3 ft in width=12 SF x 0.5 ft in depth=6 CF x 146 LB/CF x 1 ton/2000 LB=0.4 TNS
asphalt
Total Asphalt: 50.3 TNS
In addition,Rip Rap was washed away at each wingwall and is estimated to be(15 ft in front of each wingwall x 4 wingwalls,totaling 60 ft in
length x 5 ft in width towards the channel x 3 ft in depth=33.3 CY.
The Applicant has provided pictures of the road and bridge facilities dated 9-15-2013 documenting damages. These photos are attached to this
https://connect 1.dhs.gov/emm ie/,Danatnfo=isource.fema.net,S SL+dispatch Destination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 13 of 16
project worksheet.
SCOPE OF WORK:
PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00574(0):
Work To Be Completed
Location 2
1—Structural Backfill behind east abutment backwall at first roadway patch location-459.3 CY x$14.68/CY(CDOT Item Number 206-00100
Structural Backfill)=$6,742.52
2-Fill voids in roadway travel lane in the second and third asphalt patch locations—15.3 CY x 1.82=27.8 tons x$33.70/ton(CDOT Item
Number 304-06000 Aggregate Base Course Class 6 x 2 due to economies of scale as compared with number of CDOT annual projects)=
$936.86
3-Install asphalt at three locations on the westbound travel lane=50.3 tons x$81.70/ton(CDOT Item Number 403-33741 Hot Bituminous
Pavement(Grading S)(75)(PG 64-22)=$4,109.51
4—Replace Rip-Rap in front of wingwalls—33.3 CY x$83.17/CY(CDOT Item Number 506-00218 Rip Rap 18 inch)=$2,769.56
Total Location 2=$14,558.45
Total:$76,223.54 cost estimate prepared by project specialist using 2013 CDOT Average Unit Prices
Project Notes
1. Following the September 2013 flooding,applicant used contract services and/or force account resources to re-open roads/bridges and
repair damage as soon as possible. At several damage sites,repairs appear to have returned the facility to its pre-disaster design,function and
capacity with no known remaining work to be completed. However at other sites due to the onset of winter conditions,applicant was unable to
complete the restoration,thus leaving work to be completed. Finally,at some sites,applicant has expressed concern that unanticipated work
may be still be required as a result of conditions beyond their control,such as possible subsequent settlement resulting from saturated soil
conditions following the flood or where high water levels or erosion/deposition prevented a complete damage assessment
2. This PW addresses all validated flood related damages at the specified site,including completed work and work to be completed(which
damages were known to the applicant and reported to FEMA by the effective date of this P . In the event that applicant identifies subsequent,
currently unknown flood related damage at such site,applicant is advised to contact the State of Colorado Office of Emergency Management to
report the damage and request an inspection prior to its repair. In the event that the State validates the damage as a direct result of the
September 2013 flooding,the State will request FEMA prepare a version of this PW to address the eligible cost of repair.The Applicant will
notify FEMA and the State of their intent to perform permanent work related to this site before any work commences in the field.Failure to do so
may jeopardize the sub-grant for permanent work related to the work in this sub-grant.
3. Applicant has completed a substantial percentage of the work but will not have cost data available within the fourteen day Pocket Guide
rule.Per Field Operations Pocket Guide,Section 7,Cost Estimates, Page 26,"If the applicant has not produced cost data within two weeks of
the site inspection,the Project Specialist will prepare the PW on the basis of an estimate for the work accomplished".Applicant and FEMA
personnel jointly conducted all inspections and agreed to use CDOT costs for in-place costs to derive estimates on this project worksheet.
Applicant understands that all actual support documentation,invoices, FA records,contract and proof of payment will be required for final
reconciliation and or closeout process.Attached is the CDOT average in-place cost for materials.
4. The Applicant will notify FEMA and the State of their intent to perform permanent work related to this site before any work commences in
the field.Failure to do so may jeopardize the sub-grant for permanent work related to the work in this sub-grant.
5. Pursuant to 44 CFR 13.42,Grantees and Subgrantees are required to retain records,including source documentation,to support
expenditures/costs incurred against the grant award,for 3 years from the date of submission to FEMA of the final Financial Status Report.
6. The applicant must obtain all required federal,state,and local permits prior to the commencement of work.
7. The subgrantee is requesting direct administrative costs that are directly chargeable to this specific project. Associated eligible work is
related to administration of the PA project only and in accordance with 44 CFR 13.22. These costs are treated consistently and uniformly as
direct costs in all federal awards and other subgrantee activities and are not included in any approved indirect costs.
8. Project was reviewed for 406 Hazard Mitigation and a 406 HMP proposal is attached to this project worksheet.
9. The applicant is aware that all projects are subject to an insurance review as stated in 44 C.F.R. Sections 206.252 and 206.253.If
applicable,an insurance determination will be made either as anticipated proceeds or actual proceeds in accordance with the applicant's
insurance policy that may affect the total amount of the project.
10. The applicant is required to adhere to State and Federal Government Procurement rules and regulations and maintain adequate records
to support the basis for all purchasing of goods and materials and contracting services for projects approved under the Public Assistance
program,as stated in 44 CFR 13.36.The applicant has advised they have followed their normal procurement procedures.
Does the Scope of Work change the pre-disaster conditions at
the site? Yes V No Special Considerations included? VYes No
Hazard Mitigation proposal included? J Yes No Is there insurance coverage on this facility? Yes V No
https://connect I.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 14 of 16
PROJECT COST
ITEM CODE NARRATIVE QUANTITY/UNIT UNIT PRICE COST
***Version 0***
Work To Be Completed
1 9999 REPAIR 1/LS $76,223.54 $76,223.54
2 9901 Direct Administrative Costs 1/LS $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00
(Subgrantee)
3 0909 Hazard Mitigation Proposal 1/LS $6,435.00 $6,435.00
TOTAL $83,658.54
COST
PREPARED BY KATHLEEN RUVARAC TITLE PROJECT SPECIALIST SIGNATURE
APPLICANT REP.Roy Rudisill TITLE Director-OEM SIGNATURE
WELD(COUNTY) : PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00574
Conditions Information
Review Name Condition Type Condition Name Description Monitored Status
This review does not address all
federal, state and local
requirements.Acceptance of
federal funding requires recipient
Final Review Other(EHP) Standard to comply with all federal, state No Approved
Condition#2 and local laws. Failure to obtain
all appropriate federal, state and
local environmental permits and
clearances may jeopardize
federal funding.
Any change to the approved
Standard scope of work will require re-
Final Review Other(EHP) Condition#1 evaluation for compliance with No Approved
NEPA and other Laws and
Executive Orders.
The applicant should implement
appropriate FWS conservation
measures identified in the
Emergency Consultation between
FEMA and USFWS, dated
September 24, 2013,to the
Endangered extent possible; including a post-
Final Review Other(EHP) Species Act construction estimate of the No Approved
(ESA) amount of habitat affected by the
emergency response, an
evaluation of how conservation
recommendations were
implemented, and the results of
implementation in minimizing
adverse effects.
Final Review Other(EHP) Standard If ground disturbing activities No Approved
Condition#3 occur during construction,
applicant will monitor ground
disturbance and if any potential
archeological resources are
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 15 of 16
WELD(COUNTY) : PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00574
Conditions Information
discovered,will immediately
cease construction in that area
and notify the State and FEMA.
This review does not address all
federal, state and local
requirements. Acceptance of
federal funding requires recipient
EHP Review Other(EHP) Standard to comply with all federal, state No Recommended
Condition#2 and local laws. Failure to obtain
all appropriate federal, state and
local environmental permits and
clearances may jeopardize
federal funding.
Any change to the approved
Standard scope of work will require re-
EHP Review Other(EHP) Condition#1 evaluation for compliance with No Recommended
NEPA and other Laws and
Executive Orders.
The applicant should implement
appropriate FWS conservation
measures identified in the
Emergency Consultation between
FEMA and USFWS, dated
September 24, 2013,to the
Endangered extent possible; including a post-
EHP Review Other(EHP) Species Act construction estimate of the No Recommended
(ESA) amount of habitat affected by the
emergency response, an
evaluation of how conservation
recommendations were
implemented, and the results of
implementation in minimizing
adverse effects.
If ground disturbing activities
occur during construction,
applicant will monitor ground
EHP Review Other(EHP) Standard disturbance and if any potential No Recommended
Condition#3 archeological resources are
discovered,will immediately
cease construction in that area
and notify the State and FEMA.
Internal Comments
No. Queue User Date/Time Reviewer Comments
03-03-2014
Award
6 SYSTEM 11:45 PM ACCEPTED
Review
GMT
5 Final PALACIO 02-27-2014 Note:at some sites, applicant has expressed concern that
Review JOSE 04:33 PM unanticipated work may be still be required as a result of
GMT conditions beyond their control,such as possible subsequent
settlement resulting from saturated soil conditions following the
flood or where high water levels or erosion/deposition
prevented a complete damage assessment as the reason for
the 95%completion approximately$3000.00. Final Reviewer
https://connect I.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 16 of 16
Internal Comments
No. Queue User Date/fime Reviewer Comments
finds eligible the application and approves the funding of this
CAT-C project worksheet based on the applicant having
performed all required procurement procedures, perform all
required special considerations recommendations such as
permits to address EHP considerations and securing all actual
cost documentation for the financial reconciliation of this
project. Task Force Leader-J. Palacio 02/27/2014
Grantee MOSER 02-26-2014 Correct%complete in final. PW currently shows 95%
4 Review JORDAN GMT PM complete,though all work is"work to be completed"
Weld County, Cat C, 95%, Replacement of patch of asphalt
and restoration of embankment using the material that washed
out. Mitigation: add turf mat to the embankment. -tcookro-
02/21/2014 16:58:02 GMT
Project site work is not in a mapped wetland. -tcookro-
02/21/2014 16:59:46 GMT
Entire community will benefit from project completion. -tcookro
-02/21/2014 16:59:20 GMT
Action is addressed under the attached Emergency
Consultation between FEMA and USFWS, dated September
02-21-2014 24, 2013. The consultation includes conservation measures
EHP PATTERSON intended to minimize impacts to the federally listed Preble's
3 Review MOLLY GMT PM Meadow Jumping Mouse, Ute's Lady's Tress and Colorado
Butterfly Bush, and Designated Critical Habitat protected under
the ESA.-tcookro-02/21/2014 17:40:54 GMT
Per Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Project is located in
Zone B, FIRM 0802660637C, WELD CO, 09/28/1982. Project
has limited to no potential to impact the floodplain function or
resources and substantially restores site to pre-disaster
condition. -tcookro- 02/21/2014 17:12:47 GMT
The scope of work has been reviewed and meets the criteria of
the 2013 signed Programmatic Agreement, Appendix B: Ill-A,
B, D, E, F agreed to by FEMA and the SHPO.-tcookro-
02/21/2014 17:49:27 GMT
A review of the documentation provided has identified that
Weld County is insured for property damages through;
Colorado Counties Casualty and Property Pool, Policy Number
020412751.
This policy does not provide coverage for dams, dikes,
Insurance JOHNSON 02-20-2014 bridges, culverts, roadways, streets,walks, paved surfaces,
2 Review KENNETH 09:44 PM tunnels, canals, land.
GMT The insurance policy will not provide coverage for costs
identified in this PW
There will not be an insurance reduction for this PW.
The FEMA eligible damages are not to building, contents,
equipment, or vehicles; therefore, there will not be an insurance
commitment required.
Mitigation 02-20-2014 The Hazard Mitigation Proposal is approved- Brian W. Drost,
1 Review DROST BRIAN GMT PM 406 Specialist
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emm ie/,DanaInfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 1 of 43
Pt0840.4145-PW-00588(0) P
Applicant Name: Application Title:
WELD(COUNTY) WELCO05-Weld County Gravel Roads
Period of Performance Start: Period of Performance End:
09-14-2013 03-14-2015
Subgrant Application - Entire Application
Application Title: WELCGo5-Weld County Gravel Roads
Application Number: PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00583(0)
Application Type: subgrantApplication(PW)
Preparer Information
Prefix Mr.
First Name STEPHEN
Middle Initial A
Last Name MORENO
Title Project Specialist
Agency/Organization Name FEMA
Address 1 9200 MINERAL AVE
Address 2
City CENTENNIAL
State CO
Zip 80112
Email Deanna.Butterbaugh@state.co.us
Is the application preparer the Point of Contact? No
Point of Contact Information
Prefix Mr.
First Name Roy
Middle Initial
Last Name Rudisill
Title Director- OEM
Agency/Organization Weld County Office of Emergency Management
Address 1 1150 O Street
Address 2
City Greeley
State CO
ZIP 80632
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 2 of 43
Phone 970-304-6540
Fax
Email rrudisill@weldgov.com
Alternate Point of Contact Information
Prefix Mr.
First Name Trevor
Middle Initial
Last Name Jinicek
Title
Agency/Organization
Address 1 1150 O Street
Address 2 Weld County Office of Emergency Management
City Greeley
State CO
ZIP 80632
Phone 970-356-4000
Fax
Email tjinicek@weldgov.com
Project Description
Disaster Number: 4145
Pre-Application Number: PA-08-CO-4145-RPA-0088
Applicant ID: 123-99123-00
Applicant Name: WELD (COUNTY)
Subdivision:
Project Number: WELCO05
Standard Project Number/Title: 399- Road System Damage
Please Indicate the Project Type: Neither Alternate nor Improved
Application Title: WELCO05-Weld County Gravel Roads
Category: C.ROADS& BRIDGES
Percentage Work Completed? 95.0 %
As of Date: 02-18-2014
Comments
The applicant must notify the state if there are any changes in the scope of work prior to starting the repairs.
Failure to notify the State Division of Emergency Management may jeopardize receipt of federal funds.
Attachments
Damage Facilities(Part 1 of 2)
Facility Site
Number Facility Name Address County City State ZIP Previously Action
Damaged?
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 3 of 43
1 Weld County Gravel Roads- 1111 H Weld Greeley CO 80632 No
locations#1-20 Street
2 Weld County Gravel Roads- 1111 H Weld Greeely CO 80632 No
locations#21-42 Street
Comments
This is the documentation of the flood damage to the gravel road system in the southern portion of Weld
County; the damages are for that portion of the county south of highway US 34. They extend east to west
across the full width of the county.
Attachments
Document Hard Copy
User Date Type Description File File Name Action
Reference
An email from the gravel road DELETION
02-STEPHEN 13- Miscellaneous consultant y as REQUEST 22.5-US85 View
MORENO 2014_02_12_08_24_08.pdf(47.82
2014 to remove a
kb)
location site
STEPHEN 02 Post event&post PW WELCO05 GRAVEL ROADS View
MORENO 20- Photos repair photos photos B .pdf(2.64 Mb)
2014
02-
STEPHEN 20- Ma Google maps of PW WELCO05 GRAVEL ROADS View
MORENO 2014 p locations maps B .pdf(2.74 Mb)
Facility Name: Weld County Gravel Roads- locations#1-20
Address 1: 1111 H Street
Address 2:
County: Weld
City: Greeley
State: CO
ZIP: 80632
Was this site previously damaged? No
Percentage Work Completed? 95.00%
PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00588(0):
This document serves to report on the countywide damages to the Weld
county gravel roads system.ln particular these locations are south of US
34 and range east-west across the county. The locations were split into
Location: two pieces in order to avoid the 32,000 character liomit in the Scope OF
Work. This first piece covers locations#1-20 and the second covers
#21-42.
Damage Description and PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00588(0):
Dimensions: During the incident period of September 11 to September 30, 2013,
torrential rains resulted in raging torrents across Weld County, spilling
flood water from the South Platte River and nearby streams, creeks and
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+di spatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 4 of 43
reservoirs, inundating the roads and bridges throughout the County. The
flooding resulted in erosion damage to the road embankments. The
typical scenario was the longitudinal erosion of the sideslopes and the
road embankment.The sideslope is that portion of the embankment
from the top of the road surface to the bottom of the drainage ditch.
These damaged locations were characterized by narrow, 1'-3'wide, and
shallow, 1'-2' deep, gullies cut into the road prism. Damaged lengths of
roadway ranged from less than 50'L to more than a mile. Ditch cleanout
was observed and measured at 3 sites, together totaling approximately
3644 LF. A series of 4-18" arch CMPs driveway culverts required
replacement for a total length of 140 LF
There were locations at which transverse water flow widened the
damaged areas as erosion advanced toward the centerline of the road
embankment. Culvert damages are reported in a separate PW
WELCO35. This PW was created to document damages to the Weld
County gravel road system. The sites documented in this PW are
located south of US 34 and range east-west across the full width of the
county. In order to facilitate inspections, the County provided a listing of
damage sites. County personnel accompanied the project specialist on
every inspection. As inspections were carried out, some of these roads
turned out to be paved with asphalt.At these paved locations there was
minor cracking of the asphalt pavement but no obvious erosion damage
to the roadway embankment. There are a total of 42 individual locations
reported on this PW. Some sites were incorporated into other PWs and
are so identified. Upon inspection there were locations with no damage
beyond ditch cleanout. The total of 42 was retained to maintain
consistency with the project specialist's field notes. The net number of
locations that actually contributed costs to this PW is 34.
Based on the site inspection dimensions, the total embankment loss is
estimated to be 9,501.4 tons(tn). In addition, there was an estimated
loss of the gravel riding surface amounting to 4943.2 tons.All cubic yard
measurements were converted to tonnages in order to be consistent
with the Weld County practice of measurement in tons. The cubic yard
volumes were multiplied by 1.82 tons/cy. A detailed explanation of the
rationale for using this factor is provided in the Project Notes.The details
regarding the individual damage locations are documented in the
following pages. The GPS coordinate, (40.44633,-104.70146) is for the
Weld County Public Works office.
Location#R1 4-91-0.3
GPS: 40.01505,-104.21279
The damage at this location included the erosion of the gravel road
embankment including the surface gravel for approximately 74' L x 23'
W x 1' D x 1/27=63 cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x
63 cy yields a volume of 114.7 tn. The gravel surfacing was washed
away for a distance of approximately 74'L x 23'W x 0.25'D x
1/27=15.8cy. Multiplying by the 1.82 conversion factor x 15.8=28.7 tn.
Location#R2 4-81-0
GPS: 40.01521,-104.28265 to 40.01522,-104.28704
The damage at this location included the erosion of the gravel road
embankment including the surface gravel for approximately 1216' L x 8'
W x 2' D x 1/27 =720.6 cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu
yd x 720.6 cy yields a volume of 1311.5 tn. The gravel surfacing was
washed away for a distance of approximately 1216'L x 8'W x 0.25'D x
1/27= 90.1cy. Multiplying by the 1.82 conversion factor x 90.1= 163.9 tn.
Location#R3 81-8-0
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 5 of 43
GPS: 40.04424,-104.30098
The damage at this location was the erosion of the gravel road
embankment measuring approximately 112' L x 4'W x 4' D x 1/27=
66.4 cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 66.4 cy yields a
volume of 120.8 tn. Damage was confined to the sideslope of the cross
section so there was no loss of gravel surfacing. The stated dimensions
include the use of 0.5 as a multiplier to compute triangular areas.
Location#R4 73-4-0.4
GPS: 40.00929,-104.37671 to 40.00723,-104.37672
The damage at this location included the erosion of the gravel road
embankment measuring approximately 752' L x 3'W x 2' D x 1/27=
167.1 cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 167.1 cy yields
a volume of 304.1 tn. The gravel surfacing was washed away for a
distance of approximately 752'L x 22'W x 0.33'D x 1/27= 153.2cy.
Multiplying by the 1.82 conversion factor x 153.2= 278.8 tn.
Location#R5 4-73-0.9
GPS: 40.01521,-104.35782 to 40.01523,-104.35437
The damage at this location was limited to the erosion of the gravel road
embankment which measured approximately 968' L x 1'W x 1.5' D x
1/27 = 53.8 cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 53.8 cy
yields a volume of 97.9 tn. Damage was confined to the sideslope of the
cross section so there was no loss of gravel surfacing. The stated
dimensions include the use of 0.5 as a multiplier to compute triangular
areas.
Location#R6 10-75-2
GPS: 40.05868,-104.36416 to 40.05869,-104.35969
The damage at this location was limited to the erosion of the gravel road
embankment, measuring approximately 1233' L x 1.5' W x 2' D x 1/27
=137 cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 137 cy yields a
volume of 249.3 tn. Both sides of the road were eroded. . Damage was
confined to the sideslope of the cross section so there was no loss of
gravel surfacing.The stated dimensions include the use of 0.5 as a
multiplier to compute triangular areas.
Location#R7 8-71-0.2
GPS: 40.04426,-104.39166
The damage at this location was limited to the erosion of the gravel road
embankment measuring approximately 2112' L x 1.5' W x 0.5' D x 1/27
= 58.7 cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 58.7 cy yields
a volume of 106.8 tn. Damage was confined to the sideslope of the
cross section so there was no loss of gravel surfacing. The stated
dimensions include the use of 0.5 as a multiplier to compute triangular
areas.
Location#R8 67-SH52-0.5
GPS: 40.07964,-104.43292
The damage at this location was limited to the erosion of the gravel
surface for approximately 300' L x 26' W x 0.25' D x 1/27= 72.2 cy.
Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 72.2 cy yields a volume
of 131.4tn. This location was deleted by the county.
Location#R9 10-65-0.2
GPS: 40.05880,-104.43712
The damage at this location was limited to the erosion of the gravel road
embankment measuring approximately 100' L x 1.5'W x 0.5' D x 1/27
=2.8 cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 2.8 cy yields a
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emmie/,DanaInfo=isource.fema.net,S SL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 6 of 43
volume of 5.1 tn. . Damage was confined to the sideslope of the cross
section so there was no loss of gravel surfacing. The stated dimensions
include the use of 0.5 as a multiplier to compute triangular areas.
Location#R1063-2-0.1
GPS: 40.00186,-104.47099
The damage at this location included the erosion of the gravel road
embankment and the surface gravel. The embankment loss measured
approximately 200' L x 1.5'W x 0.75' D x 1/27=8.3 cy. Using the
conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 8.3 cy yields a volume of 15.2tn.
Gravel surfacing loss was measured 460'L x 23'W x 0.25'D x 1/27=98cy.
Applying the 1.82 conversion factor x 98 cy= 178.3tn.
Location#R11 6-63-0.3
GPS: 40.02969,-104.46294
The damage at this location was limited to the erosion of the gravel road
embankment measuring approximately 70'L x 3'W x 1' D x 1/27=7.8
cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 7.8 cy yields a
volume of 14.2 tn. Damage was confined to the sideslope of the cross
section so there was no loss of gravel surfacing.The stated dimensions
include the use of 0.5 as a multiplier to compute triangular areas.
Location#R12 8-63-0.2
GPS: 40.04413,-104.46472
The damage at this location was limited to the erosion of the gravel road
embankment measuring approximately 30' L x 2'W x 2' D x 1/27 =4.4
cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 4.4 cy yields a
volume of 8.1 tn. Damage was confined to the sideslope of the cross
section so there was no loss of gravel surfacing. The stated dimensions
include the use of 0.5 as a multiplier to compute triangular areas.
Location#R13/R26 6-61-0.1
GPS: 40.02957,-104.49187
The damage at this location is reported under Location#R26/R 13.
Location#R14 61-6-0.5
GPS: 40.03526,-104.48954
The damage at this location was limited to the erosion of the gravel road
embankment measuring approximately 50' L x 1'W x 2' D x 1/27= 3.7
cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 3.7 cy yields a
volume of 6.7 tn. Damage was confined to the sideslope of the cross
section so there was no loss of gravel surfacing. The stated dimensions
include the use of 0.5 as a multiplier to compute triangular areas.
Location#R15 61-8-0.5
GPS: 40.04998,-104.48952
The damage at this location was limited to erosion of the gravel road
embankment measuring approximately 20' L x 2'W x 0.5' D x 1/27 =
0.7 cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 0.7cy yields a
volume of 1.3 tn. Damage was confined to the sideslope of the cross
section so there was no loss of gravel surfacing. The stated dimensions
include the use of 0.5 as a multiplier to compute triangular areas.
Location#R16 59-2-0.75
GPS: 40.01104,-104.50864 to 40.01257,-104.50659
The damage at this location was limited to the erosion of the gravel
surface for approximately 821' L x 24'W x 0.25' D x 1/27= 182.4 cy.
Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 182.4 cy yields a volume
of 332.0 tn.
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 7 of 43
Location#R17 59-6-0.3
GPS: 40.03765,-104.50831
The damage at this location was limited to erosion of the gravel road
embankment measuring approximately 150' L x 2'W x 0.5' D x 1/27=
5.6 cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 5.6cy yields a
volume of 10.1 tn. Damage was confined to the sideslope of the cross
section so there was no loss of gravel surfacing. The stated dimensions
include the use of 0.5 as a multiplier to compute triangular areas.
Location#R18 10-55-0.5
GPS: 40.05822,-104.54220
The damage at this location included the erosion of the gravel road
embankment and the surface gravel. The embankment loss measured
approximately 50' L x 1.5' W x 1.0' D x 1/27=2.8 cy. Using the
conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 2.8cy yields a volume of 5.1 tn.
The gravel surface was eroded for approximately 50'L x 23'W x 0.25'D x
1/27 = 10.6cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 10.6cy
=19.3tn.
Location #R19 10-59-0.3
GPS: 40.05854, -104.49600
The damage at this location included the erosion of the gravel road
embankment and the surface gravel. The embankment loss measured
approximately 40' L x 1.5' W x 1.0' D x 1/27= 2.2 cy. Using the
conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 2.2cy yields a volume of 4.0 tn.
The gravel surface was eroded for approximately 50'L x 24'W x 0.25'D x
1/27 = 11.1cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 11.1cy
=20.2tn.
Location #R20 55-10-0.5
GPS: 40.06 064,-104.54609
The damage at this location included the erosion of the gravel road
embankment and the surface gravel. The embankment loss measured
approximately 700' L x 2.0.' W x 1.0' D x 1/27 = 51.9 cy. Using the
conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 51.9cy yields a volume of 94.5 tn.
The gravel surface was eroded for approximately 1000'L x 27'W x
0.25'D x 1/27=250cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x
250cy=455.Otn.
Scope of Work: PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00588(0):
Weld County used their equipment, materials and staff to effect repairs
to the damaged sites. Most of these efforts were directed toward
backfilling the longitudinally eroded gullies. There were occasional sites
where transverse flows had eaten into the embankment and washed
away the gravel riding surface. Damages were typically limited to
longitudinal erosion of the sideslope with minor losses of the traveled
way. The length of damaged locations ranged from less than 50'to more
than a mile. More than half of the sites were in excess of 100' long.
Evidence of ditch cleanout was observed and measured for a reported
ditch cleanout total of approximately 3644 LF x$3.40/Lf=$12,389.60. A
series of 4-18"arch CMPs were replaced, with a total length of 140LF
and an estimated cost of$2,093.
Replacement of the embankment materials is estimated to be 9,501.4
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,S SL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 8 of 43
tons at an estimated cost of$320,197.55. The gravel riding surface
losses were estimated to be 4,943.2 tons, with an estimated cost of
$166,586.65. The specifics of each location are presented on the
following pages. The total tonnage for the PW is 14,435.6 with an
estimated value of$486,784.20. The combined total estimate of
embankment, surfacing, ditch cleanout and replacement culverts is
$501,266.81
All cubic yard quantities were converted to tonnages to reflect Weld
County practice; see the Project Notes for details regarding the
conversion methodology. The project specialist used Colorado DOT
figures as an estimating tool. Cost data for replacement and resurfacing
gravel materials was drawn from the Colorado DOT unit bid prices for
the period Jan 1 thru March 31, 2013; see the Project Notes for
additional information. Ditch cleanout costs were taken from FEMA cost
codes and the culvert materials costs were supplied by the applicant.
SCOPE OF WORK
COMPLETED WORK
Location#R1 4-91-0.3
GPS: 40.01505,-104.21279
The county used their forces, materials and equipment to replace the
lost embankment and gravel surfacing. They repaired the damaged area
of the embankment amounting to approximately 74' L x 23'W x 1' D x
1/27=63 cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 63 cy
yields a volume of 114.7 tn. The gravel surfacing was replaced for a
distance of approximately 74'L x 23'W x 0.25'D x 1/27=15.8cy.
Multiplying by the 1.82 conversion factor x 15.8= 28.7 tn.
Embankment $33.70 x 114.7= $3,865.39
Gravel Surfacing $33.70 x 28.7= $967.19
Total $4,832.58
Location#R2 4-81-0
GPS: 40.01521,-104.28265 to 40.01522,-104.28704
The county used their forces, materials and equipment to replace the
lost embankment and gravel surfacing.They repaired the damage to the
embankment
of approximately 1216' L x 8'W x 2' D x 1/27 = 720.6 cy. Using the
conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 720.6 cy yields a volume of 1311.5
tn. The gravel surfacing was replaced for a distance of approximately
1216'L x 8'W x 0.25'D x 1/27=90.1cy. Multiplying by the 1.82
conversion factor x 90.1= 163.9 tn.
Embankment $33.70 x 1311.5=$44,197.55
Gravel Surfacing $33.70 x 163.9= $5,523.43
Total $49,720.98
Location#R3 81-8-0
GPS: 40.04424,-104.30098
The county used their forces, materials and equipment to replace the
lost embankment measuring approximately 112' L x 4'W x 4' D x 1/27
=66.4 cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 66.4 cy yields
a volume of 120.8 tn. Damage was confined to the sideslope of the
cross section so there was no loss of gravel surfacing. The stated
dimensions include the use of 0.5 as a multiplier to compute triangular
areas.
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emmie/,DanaInfo=isource.fema.net,S SL+d ispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 9 of 43
Embankment $33.70 x 120.8= $4070.96
Total $4,070.96
Location#R4 73-4-0.4
GPS: 40.00929,-104.37671 to 40.00723,-104.37672
The county used their forces, materials and equipment to repair the
damage at this location. The repair measured approximately 752' L x 3'
W x 2' D x 1/27 = 167.1 cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu
yd x 167.1 cy yields a volume of 304.1 tn. The gravel surfacing was
replaced for a distance of approximately 752'L x 22'W x 0.25'D x 1/27=
202.2cy. Multiplying by the 1.82 conversion factor x 202.2= 368.0 tn.
Embankment $33.70 x 304.1 = $10,248.17
Gravel Surfacing $33.70 x 278.8 =$9,395.56
Total $19,643.73
Location#R5 4-73-0.9
GPS:40.01521,-104.35782 to 40.01523,-104.35437
The county used their forces, materials and equipment to repair the
damage at this location. The repair was limited to the erosion of the
gravel road embankment which measured approximately 968' Lx 1'W x
1.5' D x 1/27= 53.8 cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x
53.8 cy yields a volume of 97.9 tn. Damage was confined to the
sideslope of the cross section so there was no loss of gravel surfacing.
The stated dimensions include the use of 0.5 as a multiplier to compute
triangular areas.
Embankment $33.70 x 97.9= $3,299.23
Total $3,299.23
Location#R6 10-75-2
GPS:40.05868,-104.36416 to 40.05869,-104.35969
The county used their forces, materials and equipment to repair the
damage at this location. The damage at this location was limited to the
erosion of the gravel road embankment, measuring approximately 1233'
L x 1.5'W x 2' D x 1/27 =137 cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82
tns/cu yd x 137 cy yields a volume of 249.3 tn. Both sides of the road
were eroded. . Damage was confined to the sideslope of the cross
section so there was no loss of gravel surfacing. The stated dimensions
include the use of 0.5 as a multiplier to compute triangular areas.
Embankment $33.70 x 249.3 = $8,401.41
Total $8,401.41
Location#R7 8-71-0.2
GPS: 40.04426,-104.39166
The county used their forces, materials and equipment to repair the
damage at this location. The damage at this location was limited to the
erosion of the gravel road embankment measuring approximately 2112'
L x 1.5'W x 0.5' D x 1/27= 58.7 cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82
tns/cu yd x 58.7 cy yields a volume of 106.8 tn. Damage was confined
to the sideslope of the cross section so there was no loss of gravel
surfacing. The stated dimensions include the use of 0.5 as a multiplier to
compute triangular areas.
https://connectl.dhs.goviemmid,Dananfo=isourcelema.net S SL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 10 of 43
Embankment $33.70 x 106.8 = $3,599.16
Total $3,599.16
Location#R8 67-SH52-0.5
GPS: 40.07964,-104.43292
The county used their forces, materials and equipment to repair the
damage at this location. The damage at this location was limited to the
erosion of the gravel surface for approximately 300' L x 26'W x 0.25' D
x 1/27 =72.2 cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 72.2 cy
yields a volume of 131.4tn.
Gravel Surfacing $33.70 x 131.4=$4,428.18
Total $4,428.18
Location#R9 10-65-0.2
GPS: 40.05880,-104.43712
The county used their forces, materials and equipment to repair the
damage at this location. The damage at this location was limited to the
erosion of the gravel road embankment measuring approximately 100'
L x 1.5' W x 0.5' D x 1/27 =2.8 cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82
tns/cu yd x 2.8 cy yields a volume of 5.1 tn. . Damage was confined to
the sideslope of the cross section so there was no loss of gravel
surfacing.The stated dimensions include the use of 0.5 as a multiplier to
compute triangular areas.
Embankment $33.70 x 5.1 = $171.87
Total $171.87
Location#R10 63-2-0.1
GPS: 40.00186,-104.47099
The county used their forces, materials and equipment to repair the
damage at this location. The damage at this location included the
erosion of the gravel road embankment and the surface gravel. The
embankment loss measured approximately 200' L x 1.5'W x 0.75' D x
1/27 =8.3 cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 8.3 cy
yields a volume of 15.2tn. Gravel surfacing loss was measured 460'L x
23'W x 0.25'D x 1/27=98cy. Applying the 1.82 conversion factor x 98 cy
= 178.3tn.
Embankment $33.70 x 15.2 = $512.24
Gravel Surfacing$33.70 x 178.3=$6,008.71
Total $6,520.95
Location#R11 6-63-0.3
GPS: 40.02969,-104.46294
The county used their forces, materials and equipment to repair the
damage at this location. The damage at this location was limited to the
erosion of the gravel road embankment measuring approximately 70'L x
3'W x 1' D x 1/27 =7.8 cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu
yd x 7.8 cy yields a volume of 14.2 tn. Damage was confined to the
sideslope of the cross section so there was no loss of gravel surfacing.
The stated dimensions include the use of 0.5 as a multiplier to compute
triangular areas.
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,S SL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 11 of 43
Embankment $33.70 x 14.2 = $478.54
Total $478.54
Location#R12 8-63-0.2
GPS: 40.04413,-104.46472
The county used their forces, materials and equipment to repair the
damage at this location.The damage at this location was limited to the
erosion of the gravel road embankment measuring approximately 30' L
x 2'W x 2' D x 1/27=4.4 cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu
yd x 4.4 cy yields a volume of 8.1 tn. Damage was confined to the
sideslope of the cross section so there was no loss of gravel surfacing.
The stated dimensions include the use of 0.5 as a multiplier to compute
triangular areas.
Embankment $33.70 x 8.1 = $272.97
Total $272.97
Location#R13/R26 6-61-0.1
GPS: 40.02 957,-104.49187
The damage at this location is reported under Location#R26/R 13.
Location#R14 61-6-0.5
GPS: 40.03526,-104.48954
The county used their forces, materials and equipment to repair the
damage at this location. The damage at this location was limited to the
erosion of the gravel road embankment measuring approximately 50' L
x 1'W x 2' D x 1/27= 3.7 cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu
yd x 3.7 cy yields a volume of 6.7 tn. Damage was confined to the
sideslope of the cross section so there was no loss of gravel surfacing.
The stated dimensions include the use of 0.5 as a multiplier to compute
triangular areas.
Embankment $33.70 x 6.7 = $225.79
Total $225.79
Location#R15 61-8-0.5
GPS: 40.04998,-104.48952
The county used their forces, materials and equipment to repair the
damage at this location. The damage at this location was limited to
erosion of the gravel road embankment measuring approximately 20' L
x 2'W x 0.5' D x 1/27 = 0.7 cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82
tns/cu yd x 0.7cy yields a volume of 1.3 tn. Damage was confined to the
sideslope of the cross section so there was no loss of gravel surfacing.
The stated dimensions include the use of 0.5 as a multiplier to compute
triangular areas.
Embankment $33.70 x 1.3 =$43.81
Total $43.81
Location#R16 59-2-0.75
GPS: 40.01104,-104.50864 to 40.01257,-104.50659
The county used their forces, materials and equipment to repair the
damage at this location. The damage at this location was limited to the
erosion of the gravel surface for approximately 821' L x 24'W x 0.25' D
x 1/27 = 182.4 cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 182.4
cy yields a volume of 332.0 tn.
https://connectl.dhs.gov/emm ie/,DanaInfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 12 of 43
Gravel Surfacing $33.70 x 332.0=$11,188.40
Total $11,188.40
Location#R17 59-6-0.3
GPS: 40.03765,-104.50831
The county used their forces, materials and equipment to repair the
damage at this location. The damage at this location was limited to
erosion of the gravel road embankment measuring approximately 150'
L x 2'W x 0.5' D x 1/27 = 5.6 cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82
tns/cu yd x 5.6cy yields a volume of 10.1 tn. Damage was confined to
the sideslope of the cross section so there was no loss of gravel
surfacing. The stated dimensions include the use of 0.5 as a multiplier to
compute triangular areas.
Embankment $33.70 x 10.1 = $340.37
Total $340.37
Location#R18 10-55-0.5
GPS: 40.05822,-104.54220
The county used their forces, materials and equipment to repair the
damage at this location. The damage at this location included the
erosion of the gravel road embankment and the surface gravel. The
embankment loss measured approximately 50' L x 1.5'W x 1.0' D x
1/27=2.8 cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 2.8cy
yields a volume of 5.1 tn. The gravel surface was eroded for
approximately 50'L x 23'W x 0.25'D x 1/27= 10.6cy. Using the
conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 10.6cy=19.4tn.
Embankment $33.70 x 5.1 = $171.87
Gravel Surfacing $33.70 x 19.4 =$653.78
Total $825.65
Location #R19 10-59-0.3
GPS: 40.05854, -104.49600
The county used their forces, materials and equipment to repair the
damage at this location. The damage at this location included the
erosion of the gravel road embankment and the surface gravel. The
embankment loss measured approximately 40' L x 1.5'W x 1.0' D x
1/27= 2.2 cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 2.2cy
yields a volume of 4.0 tn. The gravel surface was eroded for
approximately 50'L x 24'W x 0.25'D x 1/27= 11.1 cy. Using the
conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 11.1 cy=20.2tn.
Embankment $33.70 x 4.0 = $134.80
Gravel Surfacing $33.70 x20.2 =$680.74
Total $815.54
Location #R20 55-10-0.5
GPS: 40.06064,-104.54609
The county used their forces, materials and equipment to repair the
damage at this location. The damage at this location included the
erosion of the gravel road embankment and the surface gravel. The
https://connect I.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 13 of 43
embankment loss measured approximately 700' L x 2.0.'W x 1.0' D x
1/27 =51.9 cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 51.9cy
yields a volume of 94.5 tn.The gravel surface was eroded for
approximately 1000'L x 27'W x 0.25'D x 1/27=250cy. Using the
conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 250cy=455.0tn.
Embankment $33.70 x 94.5 =$3,184.65
Gravel Surfacing$33.70 x455.0=$15,333.50
Total $18,518.15
The project notes are contained on the next segment with locations#21-
42
Hazard Mitigation Proposal
• Is effective mitigation feasible on this site? No
If you answered Yes to the above question, the next question is required
Will mitigation be performed on this site? No
If you answered Yes to the above question, the next question is required
Do you wish to attach a Hazard Mitigation No
Proposal?
If you answered Yes to the above question,the next two questions are required
Please provide the Scope of Work for the
estimate:
(maximum 4000 characters)
Would you like to add the Hazard Mitigation No
Proposal as a cost line item to the project cost?
GIS Coordinates
Project Location Latitude Longitude
Location#R1 4-91-0.3 40.01505 -104.2127
Location#R2 4-81-0 40.01522 -104.287
40.01521 104.28265
Location#R3 81-8-0 40.04424 -104.3009
Location#R4 73-4-0.4 40.00723 -104.3767
40.00929 -104.3767
Location#R5 4-73-0.9 40.01523 -104.3543
40.01521 -104.3578
Location#R6 10-75-2 40.05868 -104.3641
40.05869 -104.3596
Location#R7 8-71-0.2 40.04426 -104.3916
Location#R8 67-SH52-0.5 40.07964 -104.43292
Location#R9 10-65-0.2 40.0588 -104.43712
Location#R10 63-2-0.1 40.00186 -104.47099
Location#R11 6-63-0.3 40.02969 -104.46294
Location#R12 8-63-0.2 40.04413 -104.46472
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emm ie/,DanaInfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 14 of 43
Location#R13/R26 6-61-0.1 40.02957 -104.4918
Location#R14 61-6-0.5 40.03526 -104.48954
Location#R15 61-8-0.5 40.04998 -104.4895
Location#R16 59-2-0.75 40.01257 -104.50659
40.01104 -104.50864
Location#R17 59-6-0.3 40.03765 -104.50831
Location#R18 10-55-0.5 40.05822 -104.5422
Location#R19 10-59-0.3 40.05854 -104.496
Location#R20 55-10-0.5 40.06064 -104.54609
Location#R21 6-55-1.75 40.02948 -104.5126
Location#R22 4-53-0.3 40.01502 -104.55932
Location#R23 53-4-0.3 40.0067 -104.54642
Location#R24 47-SH 52-0.3 40.05912 -104.62156
40.07288 -104.6216
Location#R 25 47-8-0.5 40.05176 -104.6216
Location#R26/R13 6-61-0.1 40.02955 -104.48974
40.02957 -104.49187
Location#R27 20-53-0.5 40.13131 -104.56048
Location#R28 20-51-0.5 40.13124 -104.57369
Location#R29 COL-HAR 40.10462 -104.76903
Location#R30 20-31-0.3 40.1309 -104.76696
Location#R31 22.5-US85-0.5 40.15225 -104.82329
DELETED
Location#R32 22-19-23 40.14531 -104.85108
40.14536 -104.86544
Location#R33 21-8-1.1 40.06184 -104.86739
Location#R34 15-2-0.9 40.00023 -104.90798
Location#R 35 14.5-21-0.2 40.09471 -104.86568
40.09475 -104.86378
Location#R 36 5-10-0.8 40.03727 -104.01784
Location#R37 21-6-0.5 40.03727 -104.8671
Location#R38 5-42-0 40.29135 -104.01752
Location#R 39 50-13-0 DETOUR 40.34893 -104.94349
ROAD
Location#R40 396-tr-cl 40.33403 -104.79954
40.34173 -104.784
Location#R 41 44-17-0 DETOUR 40.30571 -104.90558
ROAD 40.3054 -104.88685
Location#R42 38-9-0.0 DETOUR 40.26284 -104.94169
ROAD 40.26266 -104.97774
Facility Name: Weld County Gravel Roads-locations#21-42
Address 1: 1111 H Street
Address 2:
https://connect 1.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 15 of 43
County: Weld
City: Greeely
State: CO
ZIP: 80632
Was this site previously damaged? No
Percentage Work Completed? 95.00 %
PA-08-C O-4145-P W-00588(0):
This description is for locations 21-42. These locations were separated
from Locations#1-20 in order to overcome the EMMIE restriction of
Location: 32000 characters in the Scope of Work reporting block.
Damage Description and PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00588(0):
Dimensions: This is a continuation of the previous section of Locations 1-20
Location# R21 6-55-1.75
GPS:40.02948,-104.51260
5:40.02948,-104.51260
The damage at this location included the erosion of the gravel road
embankment and the surface gravel. The embankment loss measured
approximately 250' L x 2.5.'W x 2' D x 1/27=46.3 cy. Using the
conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 46.3cy yields a volume of 84.3 tn.
The gravel surface was eroded for approximately 250'L x 23'W x 0.25'D
x 1/27= 53.2cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 53.2cy
=96.9tn.
Location#R22 4-53-0.3
GPS: 40.01502,-104.559324
The damage at this location included the erosion of the gravel road
embankment and the surface gravel. The embankment loss measured
approximately 1056' L x 2'W x 1.5' D x 1/27 = 117.3 cy. Using the
conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 117.3.2cy yields a volume of 213.5
tn. The gravel surface was eroded for approximately 1056'L x 24'W x
0.25'D x 1/27= 234.7cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x
234.7cy=427.1 tn.
Location#R23 53-4-0.3
GPS: 40.00670, -104.54642
The damage at this location included the erosion of the gravel road
embankment and the surface gravel. Embankment damage was
confined to the sideslope of the cross section. The stated dimensions
include the use of 0.5 as a multiplier to compute triangular areas. The
embankment loss measured approximately 50' L x 1.5'W x 1' D x 1/27
=2.8 cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 2.8cy yields a
volume of 5.1 tn. The gravel surface was eroded for approximately 50'L
x 27'W x 0.25'D x 1/27= 12.5cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82
tns/cu yd x 12.5cy=22.8tn.
Location#R24 47-SH 52-0.3
GPS: 40.07288, -104.62160 to 40.05912,-104.62156
The damage at this location included the erosion of the gravel road
embankment and the surface gravel. Embankment losses were
approximately 4918'L x 1.5'W x 1' D x 1/27= 273.2cy. Using the
conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 273.2cy=497.3tn.
The gravel surface was eroded for approximately 4918'L x 1'W x 0.25'D
x 1/27=45.5cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 45.5cy
https://connect 1.dhs.gov/emm ie/,Danainfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 16 of 43
=82.9tn.
Location#R 25 47-8-0.5
GPS: 40.05176, -104.62160
The damage at this location included the erosion of the gravel road
embankment and the surface gravel. Embankment losses were
approximately 150'L x 3.5W x 2' D x 1/27 = 38.9cy. Using the
conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 38.9 =70.8tn.The gravel surface
was eroded for approximately 150'L x 2'W x 0.25'D x 1/27=2.8cy.
Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 2.8cy=5.1tn.
Location#R26/R13 6-61-0.1
GPS: 40.02957, -104.49187 to 40.02955, -104.48974
The damage at this location included the erosion of the gravel road
embankment and the surface gravel. Embankment losses were
approximately 520'L x2'W x 2.5' D x 1/27=96.3cy. Using the conversion
factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 96.3=175.3 tn. The gravel surface was eroded
for approximately 520'L x 1'W x 0.25'D x 1/27 =4.8cy. Using the
conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 4.8cy=8.8tn. This location is
reported under identifiers#13 and#26. This occurred because the
location was visited on two occasions. Data were not readily available
on the initial visit. In order to maintain the project specialist's numbering
convention the location has dual numbering. The estimated quantities
and costs are shown only once.
Location#R27 20-53-0.5
GPS: 40.13131, -10456048
The damage at this location included the erosion of the gravel road
embankment and the surface gravel. Embankment losses were
approximately 400'L x5'W x 2' D x 1/27 =148.1cy. Using the conversion
factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 148.1=269.6tn.The gravel surface was eroded
for approximately 400'L x 2'W x 0.25'D x 1/27= 7.4cy. Using the
conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 7.4cy=13.5tn.
Location#R28 20-51-0.5
GPS 40.13124, -104.57369
The damage at this location included the erosion of the gravel road
embankment and the surface gravel. Embankment losses were
approximately 1056'L x4'W x3' D x 1/27=469.3cy. Using the conversion
factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 469.3=854.2tn.The gravel surface was eroded
for approximately 1056'L x 6'W x 0.25'D x 1/27 = 58.7cy. Using the
conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 58.7cy=106.8tn.
Location#R29 COL-HAR
GPS: 40.10462,-104.76903
The damage at this location included the erosion of the gravel road
embankment and the surface gravel. Embankment losses were
approximately 165'L x 10'W x 2' D x 1/27=122.2cy. Using the
conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 122.2=222.4tn.The gravel surface
was eroded for approximately 165'L x 10'W x 0.25'D x 1/27 = 15.3cy.
Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 15.3cy=27.8tn.
Location#R30 20-31-0.3
GPS: 40.13090,-104.76696
The damage at this location included the erosion of the gravel road
embankment and the surface gravel. Embankment losses were
approximately 4447'L x 2'W x 2.5' D x 1/27=823.5cy. Using the
conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 823.5=1498.8tn.The gravel surface
was eroded for approximately 4447'L x 2'W x 0.25'D x 1/27=82.4cy.
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,S SL+d ispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 17 of 43
Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 82.4cy=149.9tn.
Location#R31 22.5-US85-0.5 DELETE
GPS: 40.15225,-104.82329
The damage at this location included the washout of the entire road
embankment including a culvert. Embankment losses were
approximately 120'L x 18'W x 2' D x 1/27 =160cy. Using the conversion
factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 160=291.2tn.The gravel surface was washed
away for approximately 120'L x 18'W x 0.25'D x 1/27 =20.0cy. Using
the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 20cy=36.4tn.
Location#R32 22-19-23
GPS: 40.14531,-104.85108 to 40.14536, -104.86544
The damage at this location included the erosion of the gravel road
embankment and the surface gravel. Embankment losses were
approximately 4032'L x 2'W x 1.5' D x 1/27=448.0cy. Using the
conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 448.0=815.4tn.The gravel surface
was eroded for approximately 4032'L x 2'W x 0.25'D x 1/27 = 74.7cy.
Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 74.7cy=135.9tn.
Location#R33 21-8-1.1
GPS: 40.06184,-104.86739
The damage at this location included the erosion of the gravel road
embankment and the surface gravel. Embankment losses were
approximately 500'L x 7'W x 2' D x 1/27=259.3cy. Using the conversion
factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 259.3=471.9tn.The gravel surface was eroded
for approximately 500'L x 4'W x 0.25'D x 1/27= 18.5cy. Using the
conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 18.5
=33.7tn
Location#R34 15-2-0.9
GPS: 40.00023, -104.90798
The damage at this site was limited to sedimentation of the roadway
ditch for a length of approximately 500 LF.
Location#R 35 14.5-21-0.2
GPS:40.09471,-104.86568 to 40.09475,-104.86378
The embankment appeared undamaged.This is a ditch cleanout
operation at the site of a 40'L x 18" CMP. The inspection team
observed that the ditches had been cleaned out on both sides of the
road for a distance of approximately 530 LF x 2 = 1060LF.
Location#R 36 5-10-0.8
GPS: 40.03727,-104.01784
This location is an asphalt paved road. The asphalt surface was
undamaged and there was no apparent damage to the road
embankment. The ditch required cleanout for approximately 1584 LF
and replacement of 4-18" arch CMPs that were serving as driveway
culverts.
Location#R37 21-6-0.5
GPS: 40.03727, -104.86710
This is the location of a bridge on an asphalt paved road. This site is
included in PW WELCO28.
Location#R38 5-42-0
GPS: 40.29135, -104.01752
This is the location of a bridge on an asphalt paved road.This location is
included in PW WELCO22.
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emm ie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,S SL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 18 of 43
Location#R 39 50-13-0 detour route
GPS: 40.34893, -104.94349
This location is being reported in PW WELCO37 as a Category B
project.
Location#R40 396-tr-cl
GPS: 40.33403, -104.79954 to 40.34173, -104.78400
The damage at this location included the erosion of the gravel road
embankment and the surface gravel. Embankment losses were
approximately 5500'L x 2'W x 2.5' D x 1/27=1018.5cy. Using the
conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 1018.5=1853.7tn.The gravel
surface was eroded for approximately 5500'L x 24'W x 0.25'D x 1/27 =
1222.2cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 1222.2cy
=2224.4tn.
Location#R41 44-17-0 detour route
GPS: 40.30540,-104.88685 to 40.30571, -104.90558
This location is being reported in PW WELCO37 as a Category B
project.
Location#R42 38-9-0.0 detour route
GPS: 40.26266, -104.97774 to 40.26284,-104.94169
This location is being reported in PW WELCO37 as a Category B
project.
Scope of Work: PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00588(0):
This isa continuation of the previous section of Locations 1-20
COMPLETED WORK
Location# R21 6-55-1.75
GPS:40.02948,-104.
The county used their forces, materials and equipment to repair the
damage at this location. The damage at this location included the
erosion of the gravel road embankment and the surface gravel. The
embankment loss measured approximately 250' L x 2.5.'W x 2' D x
1/27 =46.3 cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 46.3cy
yields a volume of 84.3 tn. The gravel surface was eroded for
approximately 250'L x 23'W x 0.25'D x 1/27= 53.2cy. Using the
conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 53.2cy=96.9tn.
Embankment $33.70 x 84.3 = $2,840.91
Gravel Surfacing $33.70 x 96.9 =$3,265.53
Total $6,106.44
Location#R22 4-53-0.3
GPS: 40.01502,-104.559324
The county used their forces, materials and equipment to repair the
damage at this location.The damage at this location included the erosion
of the m road gravel embankment and the surface gravel. The
embankment loss measured approximately 1056' L x 2'W x 1.5' D x
1/27 = 117.3 cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x
117.3.2cy yields a volume of 213.5 tn. The gravel surface was eroded
for approximately 1056'L x 24'W x 0.25'D x 1/27=234.7cy. Using the
https://connectl.dhs.gov/emm ie/,DanaInfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 19 of 43
conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 234.7cy=427.1tn.
Embankment $33.70 x 213.5 = $7,194.95
Gravel Surfacing $33.70 x427.1 =$14,393.27
Total $21,588.22
Location#R23 53-4-0.3
GPS: 40.00670, -104.54642
The county used their forces, materials and equipment to repair the
damage at this location.The damage at this location included the
erosion of the gravel road embankment and the surface gravel.
Embankment damage was confined to the sideslope of the cross
section. The stated dimensions include the use of 0.5 as a multiplier to
compute triangular areas. The embankment loss measured
approximately 50' L x 1.5'W x 1' D x 1/27 =2.8 cy. Using the
conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 2.8cy yields a volume of 5.1 tn.
The gravel surface was eroded for approximately 50'L x 27'W x 0.25'D x
1/27 = 12.5cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 12.5cy
=22.6tn.
Embankment $33.70 x 5.1 = $171.87
Gravel Surfacing $33.70 x 22.8 =$768.36
Total $940.23
Location#R24 47-SH 52-0.3
GPS: 40.07288, -104.62160 to 40.05912, -104.62156
The county used their forces, materials and equipment to repair the
damage at this location. The damage at this location included the
erosion of the gravel road embankment and the surface gravel.
Embankment losses were approximately 4918'L x 1.5W x 1' D x 1/27=
273.2cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 273.2cy
=497.3tn.
The gravel surface was eroded for approximately 4918'L x 1'W x 0.25'D
x 1/27 =45.5cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 45.5cy
=82.9tn.
Embankment $33.70 x 497.3 = $16,759.01
Gravel Surfacing $33.70 x 82.9 =$2,793.73
Total $19,552.74
Location#R 25 47-8-0.5
GPS: 40.05176, -104.62160
The county used their forces, materials and equipment to repair the
damage at this location. The damage at this location included the
erosion of the gravel road embankment and the surface gravel.
Embankment losses were approximately 150'L x 3.5W x 2' D x 1/27 =
38.9cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 38.9
=70.8tn.The gravel surface was eroded for approximately 150'L x 2'W x
0.25'D x 1/27 = 2.8cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x
2.8cy=5.1 tn.
Embankment $33.70 x 70.8 = $2,385.96
Gravel Surfacing$33.70 x 5.1 = $170.87
Total $2,557.83
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emm ie/,Danaln fo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatch Destination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 20 of 43
Location#R26/R13 6-61-0.1
GPS: 40.02957, -104.49187 to 40.02955, -104.48974
The county used their forces, materials and equipment to repair the
damage at this location. The damage at this location included the
erosion of the gravel road embankment and the surface gravel.
Embankment losses were approximately 520'L x2'W x 2.5' D x 1/27=
96.3cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 96.3=175.3 tn.
The gravel surface was eroded for approximately 520'L x 1'W x 0.25'D x
1/27=4.8cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 4.8cy
=8.8tn. This location is reported under identifiers#13 and#26. This
occurred because the location was visited on two occasions. Data were
not readily available on the initial visit. In order to maintain the project
specialist's numbering convention the location has dual numbering. The
estimated quantities and costs are shown only once.
Embankment $33.70 x 175.3 = $5,907.61
Gravel Surfacing$33.70 x 8.8 =$296.56
Total $6,204.17
Location#R27 20-53-0.5
GPS: 40.13131, -10456048
The county used their forces, materials and equipment to repair the
damage at this location. The damage at this location included the
erosion of the gravel road embankment and the surface gravel.
Embankment losses were approximately 400'L x5'W x 2' D x 1/27
=148.1cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x
148.1=269.6tn.The gravel surface was eroded for approximately 400'L x
2'W x 0.25'D x 1/27 =7.4cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu
yd x 7.4cy=13.5tn.
Embankment $33.70 x 269.6 =$9,085.52
Gravel Surfacing $33.70 x 13.5 =$454.95
Total $9,540.47
Location#R28 20-51-0.5
GPS 40.13124, -104.57369
The county used their forces, materials and equipment to repair the
damage at this location. The damage at this location included the
erosion of the gravel road embankment and the surface gravel.
Embankment losses were approximately 1056'L x4'W x3' D x 1/27
=469.3cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x
469.3=854.2tn.The gravel surface was eroded for approximately 1056'L
x 6'W x 0.25'D x 1/27 = 58.7cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82
tns/cu yd x 58.7cy=106.8tn.
Embankment $33.70 x 854.2 = $28,786.54
Gravel Surfacing $33.70 x 106.8 43,599.16
Total $32,385.70
Location#R29 COL-HAR
GPS: 40.10462, -104.76903
The county used their forces, materials and equipment to repair the
damage at this location.The damage at this location included the
https://connect I.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatch Destination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 21 of 43
erosion of the gravel road embankment and the surface gravel.
Embankment losses were approximately 165'L x 10'W x 2' D x 1/27
=122.2cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x
122.2=222.4tn.The gravel surface was eroded for approximately 165'L x
10'W x 0.25'D x 1/27 = 15.3cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82
tns/cu yd x 15.3cy=27.8tn.
Embankment $33.70 x 222.4 = $7,494.88
Gravel Surfacing $33.70 x 27.8 =$936.86
Total $8,431.74
Location#R30 20-31-0.3
GPS: 40.13090,-104.76696
The county used their forces, materials and equipment to repair the
damage at this location. The damage at this location included the
erosion of the gravel road embankment and the surface gravel.
Embankment losses were approximately 4447'L x 2'W x 2.5' D x 1/27
=823.5cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x
823.5=1498.8tn.The gravel surface was eroded for approximately
4447'L x 2'W x 0.25'D x 1/27= 82.4cy. Using the conversion factor of
1.82 tns/cu yd x 82.4cy=149.9tn.
Embankment $33.70 x 1498.8 = $50,509.56
Gravel Surfacing$33.70 x 149.9 =$5,051.63
Total $55,561.19
Location#R31 22.5-US85-0.5 DELETE
GPS: 40.15225, -104.82329
An oil company repaired this location because they were eager to gain
access to their equipment. The county will not be billed for the repair.
Weld county has requested this location be removed from their claim.
See attached E mail.
Location#R32 22-19-23
GPS: 40.14531,-104.85108 to 40.14536, -104.86544
The county used their forces, materials and equipment to repair the
damage at this location. The damage at this location included the
erosion of the gravel road embankment and the surface gravel.
Embankment losses were approximately 4032'L x 2'W x 1.5' D x 1/27
=448.0cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x
448.0=815.4tn.The gravel surface was eroded for approximately 4032'L
x 2'W x 0.25'D x 1/27= 74.7cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82
tns/cu yd x 74.7cy=135.9tn.
Embankment $33.70 x 815.4 =$27,478.98
Gravel Surfacing $33.70 x 135.9 =$4,579.83
Total $32,058.81
Location#R33 21-8-1.1
GPS: 40.06184, -104.86739
The county used their forces, materials and equipment to repair the
damage at this location. The damage at this location included the
erosion of the gravel road embankment and the surface gravel.
Embankment losses were approximately 500'L x 7'W x 2' D x 1/27
=259.3cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 22 of 43
259.3=471.9tn.The gravel surface was eroded for approximately 500'L x
4'W x 0.25'D x 1/27= 18.5cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu
yd x 18.5
=33.7tn
Embankment $33.70 x 471.9 = $15,903.03
Gravel Surfacing $33.70 x 33.7 =$1,135.69
Total $17,038.72
Location#R34 15-2-0.9
GPS: 40.06184,-104.86739
The county forces and equipment were used to cleanout the ditch and
restore the flowline. The extent of the cleanout was about 500LF. The
project specialist used the FEMA unit price, $3.40/LF cost code (3070),
to estimate the cost for ditch cleaning/shaping operation.
Cleanout/ditch shaping $3.40 x 500Lf= $1,700
Location#R 35 14.5-21-0.2
GPS: 40.09471, -104.86568 to 40.09475, -104.86378
This was a ditch cleanout operation at the site of a 40'L x 18"CMP.
County forces were used to cleanout and reestablish the flow line for the
ditches on each side of the road. The combined length of the cleaning
operation was 2x 530LF = 1060 LF. The project specialist used the
FEMA unit price, $3.40/LF cost code (3070), to estimate the cost for
ditch cleaning/shaping operation.
Cleanout/shaping $3.40/if x 10601f=$3,604
Location#R 36 5-10-0.8
GPS: 40.03727,-104.01784
This location is an asphalt paved road. The inspection team could not
identify any obvious repairs to the asphalt surface such as recent
asphalt patches. The county replaced 4—18" arch CMPs driveway
culverts totaling 140 LF. The project specialist used the county unit price
of$14.95/Lf to estimate the cost. County forces and equipment were
used to cleanout and reshape the ditch for a length of
1584LF. The project specialist used the FEMA unit price, $3.40/LF cost
code (3070), to estimate the cost for ditch cleaning/shaping operation.
18"-arch CMP @$14.95 x 140 LF = $2,093
Cleanout/shaping $3.40/If x 1584LF = $5,385.60
TOTAL= $7,478.60
Location#R37 21-6-0.5
GPS: 40.03727,-104.86710
This is the location of a bridge on an asphalt paved road. This site is
included in PW WELCO28.
Location#R38 5-42-0
GPS: 40.29135, -104.01752
This is the location of a bridge on an asphalt paved road. This location is
included in PW WELCO22.
Location#R39 50-13-0
GPS: 40.34893, -104.94349
This location was a detour route and is included as part of WELCO37.
https://connect 1.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danaln fo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatch Destination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 23 of 43
Location#R40 396-tr-cl
GPS: 40.33403, -104.79954 to 40.34173, -104.78400
The county used their forces, materials and equipment to repair the
damage at this location. The damage at this location included the
erosion of the gravel road embankment and the surface gravel.
Embankment losses were approximately 5500'L x 2'W x 2.5' D x 1/27
=1018.5cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x
1018.5=1853.7tn.The gravel surface was eroded for approximately
5500'L x 24'W x 0.25'D x 1/27= 1222.2cy. Using the conversion factor
of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 1222.2cy=2224.4tn.
Embankment $33.70 x 1,853.7 = $62,469.69
Gravel Surfacing $33.70 x 2,224.4 =$74,962.28
Total $137,431.97
Location#R 41 44-17-0 DETOUR ROUTE
GPS: 40.30540,-104.88685 to 40.30571, -104.90558
This location is being reported in PW WELCO37 as a category B
project.
Location#R42 38-9-0.0 DETOUR ROUTE
GPS: 40.26266, -104.97774 to 40.26284, -104.94169
This location is being reported in PW WELCO37 as a category B
project.
END OF SCOPE OF WORK
Weld County Project Notes these notes apply to all 42 Locations.
1. Following the September 2013 flooding, applicant used contract
services and/or force account resources to re-open roads/bridges and
repair damage as soon as possible. At several damage sites, repairs
appear to have returned the facility to its pre-disaster design, function
and capacity with no known remaining work to be completed. However
at other sites due to the onset of winter conditions, applicant was unable
to complete the restoration, thus leaving work to be completed. Finally,
at some sites, applicant has expressed concern that unanticipated work
may be still be required as a result of conditions beyond their control,
such as possible subsequent settlement resulting from saturated soil
conditions following the flood or where high water levels or
erosion/deposition prevented a complete damage assessment.
2. This PW addresses all validated flood related damages at the
specified site(s), including completed work and work to be completed
(which damages were known to the applicant and reported to FEMA by
the effective date of this P . In the event that applicant identifies
subsequent, currently unknown flood related damage at such site(s),
applicant is advised to contact the State of Colorado Office of
Emergency Management to report the damage and request an
inspection prior to its repair. In the event that the State validates the
damage as a direct result of the September 2013 flooding, the State will
request FEMA prepare a version of this PW to address the eligible cost
of repair.
3. As described in 44 CFR Section 13.42, applicant must maintain all
work-related records for a period of three(3)years from applicant
closure (final payment). All records relative to this project worksheet are
subject to examination and audit by the State, FEMA, and the
Comptroller General of the United States and must reflect work related
https://connectl.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danal nfo=i source.fema.net,S SL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 24 of 43
to disaster specific costs.
4. The applicant must obtain all required federal, state, and local permits
prior to the commencement of work.
5. The subgrantee is requesting direct administrative costs that are
directly chargeable to this specific project. Associated eligible work is
related to administration of the PA project only and in accordance with
44 CFR 13.22. These costs are treated consistently and uniformly as
direct costs in all federal awards and other subgrantee activities and are
not included in any approved indirect costs.
6. Project inspection team included the 406 Hazard Mitigation staff
members. Repairs had been completed at the time of the inspections
and no opportunities were identified.
7. The applicant is aware that all projects are subject to an insurance
review as stated in 44 C.F.R. Sections 206.252 and 206.253. If
applicable, an insurance determination will be made either as
anticipated proceeds or actual proceeds in accordance with the
applicant's insurance policy that may affect the total amount of the
project.
8. The applicant is required to adhere to State and Federal Government
Procurement rules and regulations and maintain adequate records to
support the basis for all purchasing of goods and materials and
contracting services for projects approved under the Public Assistance
program, as stated in 44 CFR 13.36. The applicant has advised they
have/will follow their normal procurement procedures.
9. All calculated quantities have been rounded to the nearest tenth of
the applicable unit, i.e.,tons, cubic yards. Minor discrepancies in
quantities or costs are the result of rounding.
10. The Weld County employee pay policy and the Weld County
procurement policy are on file in EMMIE.
11. The county measures its quantities in terms of tons. Field measured
quantities were computed in p cubic yards. The Weld County Engineering
9 9
and Construction Criteria document specifies materials densities of
1461bs/cu ft for Hot Mix Asphalt and 1351b/cu ft for embankment. The
project specialist used these densities to compute conversion factors to
apply to the cubic yard computations. For the Hot Mix Asphalt the factor
is 1461b/cu ft x 27 cu ft/cu yd x 1/2000 lb/ton= 1.97 tn/cy. For the
embankment fill material the calculation is 1351b/ct x 27 cu ft/cu yd x
1/2000 lb/tn= 1.82 to/cu yd. The field measured quantities were
multiplied by their respective conversion factors to yield quantities in
tons. A Colorado DOT(CDOT) unit cost of$33.70/tn was used for
estimating the in- place repair costs. This is twice the CDOT Item
Number 304-06000 Aggregate Base Course Class 6. This cost was
used because of expected economies of scale as compared to the
CDOT figures.
12. The applicant expects to claim Direct Administrative Costs for this
PW. The DAC charges were not available at the time of PW preparation.
The project specialist added an estimate as a temporary measure to
preserve the opportunity to claim DAC when the final figures become
available.
https://connect I.dhs.gov/emmie/,Dana)nfo=isource.fema.net,S SL+dispatch Destination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 25 of 43
13 Applicant has completed a substantial percentage of the work but will
not have cost data available within the fourteen day Pocket Guide rule.
Per Field Operations Pocket Guide, Section 7, Cost Estimates, Page 26,
"If the applicant has not produced cost data within two weeks of the site
inspection, the Project Specialist will prepare the PW on the basis of an
estimate for the work accomplished". Applicant, CO State representative
and FEMA personnel jointly conducted all inspections and agreed to use
CDOT costs for in-place costs to derive estimates on this project
worksheet.Applicant understands that all actual support documentation,
invoices, FA records, contract and proof of payment will be required for
final reconciliation and/or closeout process.
Hazard Mitigation Proposal
*Is effective mitigation feasible on this site? No
If you answered Yes to the above question, the next question is required
Will mitigation be performed on this site? No
If you answered Yes to the above question, the next question is required
Do you wish to attach a Hazard Mitigation No
Proposal?
If you answered Yes to the above question, the next two questions are required
Please provide the Scope of Work for the
estimate:
(maximum 4000 characters)
Would you like to add the Hazard Mitigation No
Proposal as a cost line item to the project cost?
GIS Coordinates
Project Location Latitude Longitude
Special Considerations
1. Does the damaged facility or item of work have insurance coverage and/or is it an No
insurable risk (e.g., buildings, equipment, vehicles, etc)?
2. Is the damaged facility located within a floodplain or coastal high hazard area and/or does No
it have an impact on a floodplain or wetland?
3. Is the damaged facility or item of work located within or adjacent to a Coastal Barrier No
Resource System Unit or an Otherwise Protected Area?
4. Will the proposed facility repairs/reconstruction change the pre-disaster conditions(e.g., No
footprint, material, location, capacity, use of function)?
5. Does the applicant have a hazard mitigation proposal or would the applicant like technical No
assistance for a hazard mitigation proposal?
6. Is the damaged facility on the National Register of Historic Places or the state historic No
listing? Is it older than 50 years?Are there more, similar buildings near the site?
7. Are there any pristine or undisturbed areas on, or near, the project site?Are there large No
tracts of forestland?
8.Are there any hazardous materials at or adjacent to the damaged facility and/or item of No
work?
9. Are there any other environmental or controversial issues associated with the damaged No
facility and/or item of work?
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,S SL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 26 of 43
If you would like to make any comments, please enter them below.
(maximum 4000 characters)
Per Regional Guidance, an EHP review is required.
Attachments
User Date Document Description Hard Copy File Name Action
Type File Reference
These two attachments PW WELCO05
STEPHEN 02-20- Floodplain show the county has not GRAVEL ROADS View
MORENO 2014 been mapped firmette B .pdf(250.94
kb)
For Category C, D, E, F,and G Projects only
Is effective mitigation feasible on this project? Yes
If you answered Yes to the above question,the next question is required
Will mitigation be performed on any sites in this project? No
If you answered Yes to the above question,the next question is required
Do you wish to attach a Hazard Mitigation Proposal? No
If you answered Yes to the above question, the next two questions are required
Please provide the Scope of Work
for the estimate:
Would you like to add the Hazard Mitigation No
Proposal as a cost line item to the project cost?
Comments
Attachments
Cost Estimate
Is this Project Worksheet for
(Preferred) Repair
Material Unit Unit of Unit Subgrant Cost
Sequence Code and/or T
ype
Description Quantity Measure Price Budget Class Estimate Action
***Version 0***
Work Completed
1 9999 class 6 14444.6 TON $ CONSTRUCTION Work $486,783.02
gravel fill 33.70 Completed
18" Work
2 9999 arch CMP 140 LF 14.95 SUPPLIES Completed $2,093.00
Ditch
Work
3 3070 Cleaning & 3144 LF 3.40 CONSTRUCTION Completed $ 10,689.60
Shaping
Total Cost: $499,565.62
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danainfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 27 of 43
Insurance Adjustments(Deductibles, Proceeds and Settlements) - 5900/5901
Subgrant
Sequence Code Material and/or Unit Unit of Unit Budget Type Cost Action
Description Quantity Measure Price Class Estimate
***Version 0***
Direct Administrative
1 9999 1 LS $ $ 1,000.00
Costs-estimated 1,000.00
Total Cost : $ 1,000.00
Total Cost Estimate: $500,565.62
(Preferred Estimate Type+ Insurance Adjustments)
Comments
Attachments
User Date Document Description Hard Copy File File Name Action
Type Reference
HOWARD 02-20- Miscellaneous Site Summary Site Summary WELCO05 View
BURD 2014 Sheet Sheet Summary.xlsx(21.12 kb)
Existing Insurance Information
Insurance Type Policy No. Bldg/Property Content Insurance Deductible Years
Amount Amount Amount Amount Required
Insurance Adjustments (Deductibles, Proceeds and Settlements)-5900/5901
Subgrant
Unit Unit of Cost
# Code Material and/or Description Quantity Measure Unit Price Budget Type Estimate Action
Class
***Version 0***
1 9999 Direct Administrative Costs- 1 LS $ $ 1,000.00
estimated 1,00a00
Total Cost: $ 1,000.00
Comments
Attachments
Comments and Attachments
Name of Section Comment Attachment
The applicant must notify the state if there are any
changes in the scope of work prior to starting the
Project Description repairs. Failure to notify the State Division of
Emergency Management may jeopardize receipt
of federal funds.
Damage Facilities
https://connect I.dhs.gov/emmie/,Dana)nfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 28 of 43
Comments and Attachments
This is the documentation of the flood damage to gravel road DELETION REQUEST
the gravel road system in the southern portion of 22.5-US85
Weld County; the damages are for that portion of 2014 02 12 08 24 08.pdf
the county south of highway US 34. They extend PW WELCO05 GRAVEL ROADS
east to west across the full width of the county. photos B .pdf
PW WELCO05 GRAVEL ROADS
maps B .pdf
Special Considerations The county has not been mapped PW WELCO05 GRAVEL ROADS
firmette B .pdf
Cost Estimate WELCO05 Summarv.xlsx
Bundle Reference#(Amendment#) Date Awarded
PA-08-CO-4145-State-0035(34) 03-03-2014
Subgrant Application - FEMA Form 90-91
Note:The Effective Cost Share for this application is 75%
FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
PROJECT WORKSHEET
DISASTER PROJECT NO. PA ID DATE CATEGORY
WELCO05 NO. 02-20-2014 C
FEMA 4145 - DR -CO 123-
99123-00
APPLICANT:WELD(COUNTY) WORK COMPLETE AS OF:
02-18-2014:95%
Site 1 of 2
DAMAGED FACILITY:
COUNTY: Weld
Weld County Gravel Roads-locations#1-20
LOCATION: LATITUDE: LONGITUDE:
40.03526 -104.48954
40.0588 -104.43712
40.30571 -104.90558
PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00588(0): 40.3054 -104.88685
40.34173 -104.784
This document serves to report on the countywide damages to the Weld county gravel roads 40.33403 -104.79954
system.ln particular these locations are south of US 34 and range east-west across the county.The 40.34893 -104.94349
locations were split into two pieces in order to avoid the 32,000 character liomit in the Scope OF 40.1309 -104.76696
Work.This first piece covers locations#1-20 and the second covers#21-42. 40.13131 -104.56048
40.04998 -104.4895
40.04426 -104.3916
40.01505 -104.2127
40.05176 -104.6216
40.07288 -104.6216
40.05912 -104.62156
40.02948 -104.5126
40.03727 -104.8671
40.10462 -104.76903
40.01522 -104.287
40.01521 104.28265
40.06184 -104.86739
40.14536 -104.86544
40.14531 -104.85108
40.15225 -104.82329
40.02957 -104.4918
40.01523 -104.3543
40.01521 -104.3578
40.00929 -104.3767
40.00723 -104.3767
40.05869 -104.3596
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 29 of 43
40.05868 -104.3641
40.09475 -104.86378
40.09471 -104.86568
40.00023 -104.90798
40.06064 -104.54609
40.05854 -104.496
40.03727 -104.01784
40.05822 -104.5422
40.01257 -104.50659
40.01104 -104.50864
40.07964 -104.43292
40.02957 -104.49187
• 40.02955 -104.48974
40.02969 -104.46294
40.29135 -104.01752
40.0067 -104.54642
40.00186 -104.47099
40.26284 -104.94169
40.26266 -104.97774
40.13124 -104.57369
40.03765 -104.50831
40.04424 -104.3009
40.01502 -104.55932
40.04413 -104.46472
DAMAGE DESCRIPTION AND DIMENSIONS:
• PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00588(0):
During the incident period of September 11 to September 30,2013,torrential rains resulted in raging torrents across Weld County,spilling
flood water from the South Platte River and nearby streams,creeks and reservoirs,inundating the roads and bridges throughout the
County.The flooding resulted in erosion damage to the road embankments.The typical scenario was the longitudinal erosion of the
sideslopes and the road embankment.The sideslope is that portion of the embankment from the top of the road surface to the bottom of
the drainage ditch.These damaged locations were characterized by narrow,1'-3'wide,and shallow,1'-2'deep,gullies cut into the road
prism.Damaged lengths of roadway ranged from less than 50'L to more than a mile.Ditch deanout was observed and measured at 3
sites,together totaling approximately 3644 LF.A series of 4-18"arch CMPs driveway culverts required replacement for a total length of
140 LF
There were locations at which transverse water flow widened the damaged areas as erosion advanced toward the centerline of the road
embankment. Culvert damages are reported in a separate PW WELCO35. This PW was created to document damages to the Weld
County gravel road system.The sites documented in this PW are located south of US 34 and range east-west across the full width of the
county.In order to facilitate inspections,the County provided a listing of damage sites.County personnel accompanied the project
specialist on every inspection. As inspections were carried out,some of these roads turned out to be paved with asphalt.At these paved
locations there was minor cracking of the asphalt pavement but no obvious erosion damage to the roadway embankment.There are a
total of 42 individual locations reported on this PW.Some sites were incorporated into other PWs and are so identified.Upon inspection
there were locations with no damage beyond ditch deanout.The total of 42 was retained to maintain consistency with the project
specialist's field notes.The net number of locations that actually contributed costs to this PW is 34.
Based on the site inspection dimensions,the total embankment loss is estimated to be 9,501.4 tons(tn).In addition,there was an
estimated loss of the gravel riding surface amounting to 4943.2 tons.All cubic yard measurements were converted to tonnages in order to
be consistent with the Weld County practice of measurement in tons.The cubic yard volumes were multiplied by 1.82 tons/cy.A detailed
explanation of the rationale for using this factor is provided in the Project Notes.The details regarding the individual damage locations are
documented in the following pages. The GPS coordinate,(40.44633,-104.70146)is for the Weld County Public Works office.
Location#R1 4-91-0.3
GPS:40.01505,-104.21279
The damage at this location included the erosion of the gravel road embankment including the surface gravel for approximately 74'L x 23'
W x 1'D x 1/27=63 cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 63 cy yields a volume of 114.7 tn.The gravel surfacing was
washed away for a distance of approximately 74'L x 23W x 0.25D x 1/27=15.8cy.Multiplying by the 1.82 conversion factor x 15.8=28.7
tn.
Location#R2 4-81-0
GPS:40.01521,-104.28265 to 40.01522,-104.28704
The damage at this location included the erosion of the gravel road embankment including the surface gravel for approximately 1216'L x
8'W x 2'D x 1/27=720.6 cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 720.6 cy yields a volume of 1311.5 tn.The gravel surfacing
was washed away for a distance of approximately 1216'L x 8'W x 0.25'D x 1/27=90.1 cy.Multiplying by the 1.82 conversion factor x 90.1=
163.9 tn.
Location#R3 81-8-0
GPS:40.04424,-104.30098
The damage at this location was the erosion of the gravel road embankment measuring approximately 112'L x 4'W x 4'D x 1/27=66.4
cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 66.4 cy yields a volume of 120.8 tn.Damage was confined to the sideslope of the
cross section so there was no loss of gravel surfacing.The stated dimensions include the use of 0.5 as a multiplier to compute triangular
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 30 of 43
areas.
Location#R4 73-4-0.4
GPS:40.00929,-104.37671 to 40.00723,-104.37672
The damage at this location included the erosion of the gravel road embankment measuring approximately 752'L x 3'W x 2'D x 1/27=
167.1 cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 167.1 cy yields a volume of 304.1 tn.The gravel surfacing was washed away for
a distance of approximately 752'L x 22'W x 0.33'D x 1/27=153.2cy.Multiplying by the 1.82 conversion factor x 153.2=278.8 tn.
Location#R5 4-73-0.9
GPS:40.01521,-104.35782 to 40.01523,-104.35437
The damage at this location was limited to the erosion of the gravel road embankment which measured approximately 968'L x 1'W x 1.5'
D x 1/27=53.8 cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 53.8 cy yields a volume of 97.9 tn.Damage was confined to the
sideslope of the cross section so there was no loss of gravel surfacing.The stated dimensions include the use of 0.5 as a multiplier to
compute triangular areas.
Location#R6 10-75-2
GPS:40.05868,-104.36416 to 40.05869,-104.35969
The damage at this location was limited to the erosion of the gravel road embankment,measuring approximately 1233'L x 1.5'W x 2'D x
1/27=137 cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 137 cy yields a volume of 249.3 tn.Both sides of the road were eroded..
Damage was confined to the sideslope of the cross section so there was no loss of gravel surfacing.The stated dimensions include the
use of 0.5 as a multiplier to compute triangular areas.
Location#R7 8-71-0.2
GPS:40.04426,-104.39166
The damage at this location was limited to the erosion of the gravel road embankment measuring approximately 2112'L x 1.5'W x 0.5'D
x 1/27=58.7 cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 58.7 cy yields a volume of 106.8 tn. Damage was confined to the
sideslope of the cross section so there was no loss of gravel surfacing.The stated dimensions include the use of 0.5 as a multiplier to
compute triangular areas.
Location#R8 67-SH52-0.5
GPS:40.07964,-104.43292
The damage at this location was limited to the erosion of the gravel surface for approximately 300'L x 26'W x 0.25'D x 1/27=72.2 cy.
Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 72.2 cy yields a volume of 131.4tn.This location was deleted by the county.
Location#R9 10-65-0.2
GPS:40.05880,-104.43712
The damage at this location was limited to the erosion of the gravel road embankment measuring approximately 100'L x 1.5'W x 0.5'D
x 1/27=2.8 cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 2.8 cy yields a volume of 5.1 tn..Damage was confined to the sideslope of
the cross section so there was no loss of gravel surfacing.The stated dimensions include the use of 0.5 as a multiplier to compute
triangular areas.
Location#R10 63-2-0.1
GPS:40.00186,-104.47099
The damage at this location included the erosion of the gravel road embankment and the surface gravel.The embankment loss measured
approximately 200'L x 1.5'W x 0.75'D x 1/27=8.3 cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 8.3 cy yields a volume of 15.2tn.
Gravel surfacing loss was measured 460'L x 23'W x 0.25'D x 1/27=98cy.Applying the 1.82 conversion factor x 98 cy=178.3tn.
Location#R11 6-63-0.3
GPS:40.02969,-104.46294
The damage at this location was limited to the erosion of the gravel road embankment measuring approximately 70'L x 3'W x 1'D x 1/27
=7.8 cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 7.8 cy yields a volume of 14.2 tn.Damage was confined to the sideslope of the
cross section so there was no loss of gravel surfacing.The stated dimensions include the use of 0.5 as a multiplier to compute triangular
areas.
Location#R12 8-63-0.2
GPS:40.04413,-104.46472
The damage at this location was limited to the erosion of the gravel road embankment measuring approximately 30'L x 2'W x 2'D x
1/27=4.4 cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 4.4 cy yields a volume of 8.1 tn.Damage was confined to the sideslope of
the cross section so there was no loss of gravel surfacing.The stated dimensions include the use of 0.5 as a multiplier to compute
triangular areas.
Location#R13/R26 6-61-0.1
GPS:40.02957,-104.49187
The damage at this location is reported under Location#R26/R 13.
Location*R14 61-6-0.5
GPS:40.03526,-104.48954
The damage at this location was limited to the erosion of the gravel road embankment measuring approximately 50'L x 1'W x 2'D x
1/27=3.7 cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 3.7 cy yields a volume of 6.7 tn.Damage was confined to the sideslope of
the cross section so there was no loss of gravel surfacing.The stated dimensions include the use of 0.5 as a multiplier to compute
triangular areas.
Location#R15 61-8-0.5
GPS:40.04998,-104.48952
https://connect I.dhs.gov/emmie/,Dana)nfo=isource.fema.net,S SL+dispatch Destination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 31 of 43
The damage at this location was limited to erosion of the gravel road embankment measuring approximately 20'L x 2'W x 0.5'D x 1/27
=0.7 cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 0.7cy yields a volume of 1.3 tn.Damage was confined to the sideslope of the
cross section so there was no loss of gravel surfacing.The stated dimensions include the use of 0.5 as a multiplier to compute triangular
areas.
Location#R16 59-2-0.75
GPS:40.01104,-104.50864 to 40.01257,-104.50659
The damage at this location was limited to the erosion of the gravel surface for approximately 821'L x 24'W x 0.25'D x 1/27=182.4 cy.
Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 182.4 cy yields a volume of 332.0 tn.
Location#R17 59-6-0.3
GPS:40.03765,-104.50831
The damage at this location was limited to erosion of the gravel road embankment measuring approximately 150'L x 2'W x 0.5'D x 1/27
=5.6 cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 ins/cu yd x 5.6cy yields a volume of 10.1 tn.Damage was confined to the sideslope of the
cross section so there was no loss of gravel surfacing.The stated dimensions include the use of 0.5 as a multiplier to compute triangular
areas.
Location#R18 10-55-0.5
GPS:40.05822,-104.54220
The damage at this location included the erosion of the gravel road embankment and the surface gravel.The embankment loss measured
approximately 50'L x 1.5'W x 1.0'D x 1/27=2.8 cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 2.8cy yields a volume of 5.1 tn.The
gravel surface was eroded for approximately 50'L x 23W x 0.25'D x 1/27=10.6cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 Ins/cu yd x 10.6cy
=19.3tn.
Location #R19 10-59-0.3
GPS:40.05854,-104.49600
The damage at this location included the erosion of the gravel road embankment and the surface gravel.The embankment loss measured
approximately 40'L x 1.5'W x 1.0'D x 1/27=2.2 cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 2.2cy yields a volume of 4.0 tn.The
gravel surface was eroded for approximately 50'L x 24'W x 0.25'D x 1/27=11.1 cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 11.1cy
=20.21n.
Location #R20 55-10-0.5
GPS:40.06064,-104.54609
The damage at this location included the erosion of the gravel road embankment and the surface gravel.The embankment loss measured
approximately 700'L x 2.0.'W x 1.0'D x 1/27=51.9 cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 51.9cy yields a volume of 94.5
tn.The gravel surface was eroded for approximately 1000'L x 27'W x 0.25'D x 1/27=250cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd
x 250cy=455.0tn.
SCOPE OF WORK:
PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00588(0):
Weld County used their equipment,materials and staff to effect repairs to the damaged sites.Most of these efforts were directed toward
backfilling the longitudinally eroded gullies.There were occasional sites where transverse flows had eaten into the embankment and
washed away the gravel riding surface.Damages were typically limited to longitudinal erosion of the sideslope with minor losses of the
traveled way.The length of damaged locations ranged from less than 50'to more than a mile.More than half of the sites were in excess of
100'long.Evidence of ditch deanout was observed and measured for a reported ditch cleanout total of approximately 3644 LF x$3.40/Lf
=$12,389.60.A series of 4-18"arch CMPs were replaced,with a total length of 140LF and an estimated cost of$2,093.
Replacement of the embankment materials is estimated to be 9,501.4 tons at an estimated cost of$320,197.55.The gravel riding surface
losses were estimated to be 4,943.2 tons,with an estimated cost of$166,586.65. The specifics of each location are presented on the
following pages.The total tonnage for the PW is 14,435.6 with an estimated value of$486,784.20. The combined total estimate of
embankment,surfacing,ditch deanout and replacement culverts is$501,266.81
All cubic yard quantities were converted to tonnages to reflect Weld County practice;see the Project Notes for details regarding the
conversion methodology.The project specialist used Colorado DOT figures as an estimating tool.Cost data for replacement and
resurfacing gravel materials was drawn from the Colorado DOT unit bid prices for the period Jan 1 thru March 31,2013;see the Project
Notes for additional information.Ditch cleanout costs were taken from FEMA cost codes and the culvert materials costs were supplied by
the applicant.
SCOPE OF WORK
COMPLETED WORK
Location#R1 4-91-0.3
GPS:40.01505,-104.21279
The county used their forces,materials and equipment to replace the lost embankment and gravel surfacing.They repaired the damaged
area of the embankment amounting to approximately 74'L x 23'W x 1'D x 1/27=63 cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x
63 cy yields a volume of 114.7 in.The gravel surfacing was replaced for a distance of approximately 74'L x 23'W x 0.25'D x 1/27=15.8cy.
Multiplying by the 1.82 conversion factor x 15.8=28.7 in.
https://connectl.dhs.gov/emm ie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 32 of 43
Embankment $33.70 x 114.7=$3,865.39
Gravel Surfacing$33.70 x 28.7= $967.19
Total $4,832.58
Location#R2 4-81-0
GPS:40.01521,-104.28265 to 40.01522,-104.28704
The county used their forces,materials and equipment to replace the lost embankment and gravel surfacing.They repaired the damage to
the embankment
of approximately 1216'L x 8'W x 2'D x 1/27=720.6 cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 720.6 cy yields a volume of
1311.5 tn.The gravel surfacing was replaced for a distance of approximately 1216'L x 8'W x 0.25'D x 1/27=90.1cy.Multiplying by the
1.82 conversion factor x 90.1=163.9 tn.
Embankment $33.70 x 1311.5=$44,197.55
Gravel Surfacing$33.70 x 163.9= $5,523.43
Total $49,720.98
Location#R3 81-8-0
GPS:40.04424,-104.30098
The county used their forces,materials and equipment to replace the lost embankment measuring approximately 112'L x 4'W x 4'D x
1/27=66.4 cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 66.4 cy yields a volume of 120.8 tn.Damage was confined to the sideslope
of the cross section so there was no loss of gravel surfacing.The stated dimensions include the use of 0.5 as a multiplier to compute
triangular areas.
Embankment $33.70 x 120.8=$4070.96
Total $4,070.96
Location#R4 73-4-0.4
GPS:40.00929,-104.37671 to 40.00723,-104.37672
The county used their forces,materials and equipment to repair the damage at this location.The repair measured approximately 752'L x
3'W x 2'D x 1/27=167.1 cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 167.1 cy yields a volume of 304.1 tn.The gravel surfacing
was replaced for a distance of approximately 752'L x 22'W x 0.25'D x 1/27=202.2cy.Multiplying by the 1.82 conversion factor x 202.2=
368.0 tn.
Embankment $33.70 x 304.1 =$10,248.17
Gravel Surfacing$33.70 x 278.8=$9,395.56
Total $19,643.73
Location#R5 4-73-0.9
GPS:40.01521,-104.35782 to 40.01523,-104.35437
The county used their forces,materials and equipment to repair the damage at this location.The repair was limited to the erosion of the
gravel road embankment which measured approximately 968'L x 1'W x 1.5'D x 1/27=53.8 cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82
tns/cu yd x 53.8 cy yields a volume of 97.9 tn.Damage was confined to the sideslope of the cross section so there was no loss of gravel
surfacing.The stated dimensions include the use of 0.5 as a multiplier to compute triangular areas.
Embankment $33.70 x 97.9=$3,299.23
Total $3,299.23
Location#R6 10-75-2
GPS:40.05868,-104.36416 to 40.05869,-104.35969
The county used their forces,materials and equipment to repair the damage at this location.The damage at this location was limited to the
erosion of the gravel road embankment,measuring approximately 1233'L x 1.5'W x 2'D x 1/27=137 cy.Using the conversion factor of
1.82 tns/cu yd x 137 cy yields a volume of 249.3 tn.Both sides of the road were eroded..Damage was confined to the sideslope of the
cross section so there was no loss of gravel surfacing.The stated dimensions include the use of 0.5 as a multiplier to compute triangular
areas.
Embankment $33.70 x 249.3 =$8,401.41
Total $8,401.41
Location#R7 8-71-0.2
GPS:40.04426,-104.39166
The county used their forces,materials and equipment to repair the damage at this location.The damage at this location was limited to the
erosion of the gravel road embankment measuring approximately 2112'L x 1.5'W x 0.5'D x 1/27=58.7 cy.Using the conversion factor
of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 58.7 cy yields a volume of 106.8 tn. Damage was confined to the sideslope of the cross section so there was no loss
of gravel surfacing.The stated dimensions include the use of 0.5 as a multiplier to compute triangular areas.
Embankment $33.70 x 106.8 =$3,599.16
Total $3,599.16
Location#R8 67-SH52-0.5
GPS:40.07964,-104.43292
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 33 of 43
The county used their forces,materials and equipment to repair the damage at this location.The damage at this location was limited to the
erosion of the gravel surface for approximately 300'L x 26'W x 0.25'D x 1/27=72.2 cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x
72.2 cy yields a volume of 131.4tn.
Gravel Surfacing $33.70 x 131.4=$4,428.18
Total $4,428.18
Location#R9 10-65-0.2
GPS:40.05880,-104.43712
The county used their forces,materials and equipment to repair the damage at this location.The damage at this location was limited to the
erosion of the gravel road embankment measuring approximately 100'L x 1.5'W x 0.5'D x 1/27=2.8 cy.Using the conversion factor of
1.82 tns/cu yd x 2.8 cy yields a volume of 5.1 tn..Damage was confined to the sideslope of the cross section so there was no loss of
gravel surfacing.The stated dimensions include the use of 0.5 as a multiplier to compute triangular areas.
Embankment $33.70 x 5.1 =$171.87
Total $171.87
Location#R10 63-2-0.1
GPS:40.00186,-104.47099
The county used their forces,materials and equipment to repair the damage at this location.The damage at this location included the
erosion of the gravel road embankment and the surface gravel.The embankment loss measured approximately 200'L x 1.5'W x 0.75'D
x 1/27=8.3 cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 8.3 cy yields a volume of 15.2tn.Gravel surfacing loss was measured
460'L x 23'W x 0.25'D x 1/27=98cy.Applying the 1.82 conversion factor x 98 cy=178.3tn.
Embankment $33.70 x 15.2 =$512.24
Gravel Surfacing$33.70 x 178.3=$6,008.71
Total $6,520.95
Location#R11 6-63-0.3
GPS:40.02969,-104.46294
The county used their forces,materials and equipment to repair the damage at this location.The damage at this location was limited to the
erosion of the gravel road embankment measuring approximately 70'L x 3'W x 1'D x 1/27=7.8 cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82
tns/cu yd x 7.8 cy yields a volume of 14.2 tn.Damage was confined to the sideslope of the cross section so there was no loss of gravel
surfacing.The stated dimensions include the use of 0.5 as a multiplier to compute triangular areas.
Embankment $33.70 x 14.2 =$478.54
Total $478.54
Location#R12 8-63-0.2
GPS:40.04413,-104.46472
The county used their forces,materials and equipment to repair the damage at this location.The damage at this location was limited to the
erosion of the gravel road embankment measuring approximately 30'L x 2'W x 2'D x 1/27=4.4 cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82
tns/cu yd x 4.4 cy yields a volume of 8.1 tn.Damage was confined to the sideslope of the cross section so there was no loss of gravel
surfacing.The stated dimensions include the use of 0.5 as a multiplier to compute triangular areas.
Embankment $33.70 x 8.1 =$272.97
Total $272.97
Location#R13/R26 6-61-0.1
GPS:40.02957,-104.49187
The damage at this location is reported under Location#R26/R 13.
Location#R14 61-6-0.5
GPS:40.03526,-104.48954
The county used their forces,materials and equipment to repair the damage at this location.The damage at this location was limited to the
erosion of the gravel road embankment measuring approximately 50'L x 1'W x 2'D x 1/27=3.7 cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82
Ins/cu yd x 3.7 cy yields a volume of 6.7 tn.Damage was confined to the sideslope of the cross section so there was no loss of gravel
surfacing.The stated dimensions include the use of 0.5 as a multiplier to compute triangular areas.
Embankment $33.70 x 6.7 =$225.79
Total $225.79
Location#R15 61-8-0.5
GPS:40.04998,-104.48952
The county used their forces,materials and equipment to repair the damage at this location.The damage at this location was limited to
erosion of the gravel road embankment measuring approximately 20'L x 2'W x 0.5 D x 1/27=0.7 cy.Using the conversion factor of
1.82 tns/cu yd x 0.7cy yields a volume of 1.3 tn. Damage was confined to the sideslope of the cross section so there was no loss of gravel
surfacing.The stated dimensions include the use of 0.5 as a multiplier to compute triangular areas.
Embankment $33.70 x 1.3 =$43.81
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emmie/,DanaInfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 34 of 43
Total $43.81
Location#R16 59-2-0.75
GPS:40.01104,-104.50864 to 40.01257,-104.50659
The county used their forces,materials and equipment to repair the damage at this location.The damage at this location was limited to the
erosion of the gravel surface for approximately 821'L x 24'W x 0.25'D x 1/27=182.4 cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd
x 182.4 cy yields a volume of 332.0 tn.
Gravel Surfacing$33.70 x 332.0=$11,188.40
Total $11,188.40
Location#R17 59-6-0.3
GPS:40.03765,-104.50831
The county used their forces,materials and equipment to repair the damage at this location.The damage at this location was limited to
erosion of the gravel road embankment measuring approximately 150'L x 2'W x 0.5'D x 1/27=5.6 cy.Using the conversion factor of
1.82 tns/cu yd x 5.6cy yields a volume of 10.1 tn. Damage was confined to the sideslope of the cross section so there was no loss of
gravel surfacing.The stated dimensions include the use of 0.5 as a multiplier to compute triangular areas.
Embankment $33.70 x 10.1 =$340.37
Total $340.37
Location#R18 10-55-0.5
GPS:40.05822,-104.54220
The county used their forces,materials and equipment to repair the damage at this location.The damage at this location included the
erosion of the gravel road embankment and the surface gravel.The embankment loss measured approximately 50'L x 1.5'W x 1.0'D x
1/27=2.8 cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 2.8cy yields a volume of 5.1 tn.The gravel surface was eroded for
approximately 50'L x 23'W x 0.25D x 1/27=10.6cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 10.6cy=19.4tn.
Embankment $33.70 x 5.1 =$171.87
Gravel Surfacing$33.70 x 19.4=$653.78
Total $825.65
Location #R19 10-59-0.3
GPS:40.05854,-104.49600
The county used their forces,materials and equipment to repair the damage at this location.The damage at this location included the
erosion of the gravel road embankment and the surface gravel.The embankment loss measured approximately 40'L x 1.5'W x 1.0'D x
1/27=2.2 cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 2.2cy yields a volume of 4.0 tn.The gravel surface was eroded for
approximately 50'L x 24'W x 0.25'D x 1/27=11.1cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 11.1cy=20.2tn.
Embankment $33.70 x 4.0 =$134.80
Gravel Surfacing$33.70 x20.2=$680.74
Total $815.54
Location #R20 55-10-0.5
GPS:40.06064,-104.54609
The county used their forces,materials and equipment to repair the damage at this location.The damage at this location included the
erosion of the gravel road embankment and the surface gravel.The embankment loss measured approximately 700'L x 2.0.'W x 1.0'D x
1/27=51.9 cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 51.9cy yields a volume of 94.5 tn.The gravel surface was eroded for
approximately 1000'L x 27'W x 0.25'D x 1/27=250cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 250cy=455.otn.
Embankment $33.70 x 94.5 =$3,184.65
Gravel Surfacing$33.70 x455.0=$15,333.50
Total $18,518.15
The project notes are contained on the next segment with locations#21-42
Site 2 of 2
DAMAGED FACILITY:
COUNTY: Weld
Weld County Gravel Roads-locations#21-42
LOCATION: LATITUDE: LONGITUDE:
PA-08-CO-4145-P W-00588(0):
This description is for locations 21-42.These locations were separated from Locations#1-20 in order
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,S SL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 35 of 43
to overcome the EMMIE restriction of 32000 characters in the Scope of Work reporting block.
DAMAGE DESCRIPTION AND DIMENSIONS:
PA-08-CO-4145-P W-00588(0):
This is a continuation of the previous section of Locations 1-20
Location#R21 6-55-1.75
G P S:40.02948,-104.51260
The damage at this location included the erosion of the gravel road embankment and the surface gravel.The embankment loss measured
approximately 250'L x 2.5.'W x 2'D x 1/27=46.3 cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 46.3cy yields a volume of 84.3 tn.
The gravel surface was eroded for approximately 250'L x 23W x 0.25'D x 1/27=53.2cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x
53.2cy=96.9tn.
Location#R22 4-53-0.3
GPS:40.01502,-104.559324
The damage at this location included the erosion of the gravel road embankment and the surface gravel.The embankment loss measured
approximately 1056'L x 2'W x 1.5'D x 1/27=117.3 cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 117.3.2cy yields a volume of
213.5 tn.The gravel surface was eroded for approximately 1056'L x 24'W x 0.25'D x 1/27=234.7cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82
tns/cu yd x 234.7cy=427.1 tn.
Location#R23 53-4-0.3
GPS:40.00670,-104.54642
The damage at this location included the erosion of the gravel road embankment and the surface gravel.Embankment damage was
confined to the sideslope of the cross section.The stated dimensions include the use of 0.5 as a multiplier to compute triangular areas.
The embankment loss measured approximately 50'L x 1.5'W x 1'D x 1/27=2.8 cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/w yd x
2.8cy yields a volume of 5.1 tn.The gravel surface was eroded for approximately 50'L x 27'W x 0.25'0 x 1/27=12.5cy.Using the
conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 12.5cy=22.8tn.
Location#R24 47-SH 52-0.3
GPS:40.07288,-104.62160 to 40.05912,-104.62156
The damage at this location included the erosion of the gravel road embankment and the surface gravel.Embankment losses were
approximately 4918'L x 1.5'W x 1'D x 1/27=273.2cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 273.2cy=497.3tn.
The gravel surface was eroded for approximately 4918'L x 1'W x 0.25'D x 1/27=45.5cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x
45.5cy=82.9tn.
Location#R 25 47-8-0.5
GPS:40.05176,-104.62160
The damage at this location included the erosion of the gravel road embankment and the surface gravel.Embankment losses were
approximately 150'L x 3.5W x 2'D x 1/27=38.9cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 38.9=70.8tn.The gravel surface was
eroded for approximately 150'L x 2'W x 0.25'D x 1/27=2.8cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 2.8cy=5.1in.
Location#R26/R13 6-61-0.1
GPS:40.02957,-104.49187 to 40.02955,-104.48974
The damage at this location included the erosion of the gravel road embankment and the surface gravel.Embankment losses were
approximately 520'L x2'W x 2.5'D x 1/27=96.3cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 96.3=175.3 tn.The gravel surface was
eroded for approximately 520'L x 1'W x 0.25'D x 1/27=4.8cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 4.8cy=8.8tn.This location
is reported under identifiers#13 and#26.This occurred because the location was visited on two occasions.Data were not readily
available on the initial visit.In order to maintain the project specialist's numbering convention the location has dual numbering.The
estimated quantities and costs are shown only once.
Location#R27 20-53-0.5
GPS:40.13131,-10456048
The damage at this location included the erosion of the gravel road embankment and the surface gravel.Embankment losses were
approximately 400'L x5'W x 2'D x 1/27=148.1cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 148.1=269.6tn.The gravel surface was
eroded for approximately 400'L x 2'W x 0.25'D x 1/27=7.4cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 7.4cy=13.5tn.
Location#R28 20-51-0.5
GPS 40.13124,-104.57369
The damage at this location included the erosion of the gravel road embankment and the surface gravel.Embankment losses were
approximately 1056'L x4'W x3'D x 1/27=469.3cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 469.3=854.2tn.The gravel surface was
eroded for approximately 1056'L x 6'W x 0.25'D x 1/27=58.7cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 58.7cy=106.8tn.
Location#R29 COL-HAR
GPS:40.10462,-104.76903
The damage at this location included the erosion of the gravel road embankment and the surface gravel.Embankment losses were
approximately 165'L x 10'W x 2'D x 1/27=122.2cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 122.2=222.4tn.The gravel surface was
eroded for approximately 165'L x 10'W x 0.25'D x 1/27=15.3cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 15.3cy=27.8tn.
Location#R30 20-31-0.3
https://connect I.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 36 of 43
GPS:40.13090,-104.76696
The damage at this location included the erosion of the gravel road embankment and the surface gravel.Embankment losses were
approximately 4447'L x 2'W x 2.5'D x 1/27=823.5cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 823.5=1498.8tn.The gravel surface
was eroded for approximately 4447'L x 2'W x 0.25'D x 1/27=82.4cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 82.4cy=149.9tn.
Location#R31 22.5-U585-0.5 DELETE
GPS:40.15225,-104.82329
The damage at this location included the washout of the entire road embankment including a culvert.Embankment losses were
approximately 120'L x 18'W x 2'D x 1/27=160cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 ins/cu yd x 160=291.2tn.The gravel surface was
washed away for approximately 120'L x 18'W x 0.25'D x 1/27=20.0cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 20cy=36.4tn.
Location#R32 22-19-23
GPS:40.14531,-104.85108 to 40.14536,-104.86544
The damage at this location included the erosion of the gravel road embankment and the surface gravel.Embankment losses were
approximately 4032'L x 2'W x 1.5'D x 1/27=448.0cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 448.0=815.4tn.The gravel surface
was eroded for approximately 4032'L x 2'W x 0.25'D x 1/27=74.7cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 74.7cy=135.91n.
Location#R33 21-8-1.1
GPS:40.06184,-104.86739
The damage at this location included the erosion of the gravel road embankment and the surface gravel.Embankment losses were
approximately 500'L x 7'W x 2'D x 1/27=259.3cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 259.3=471.9tn.The gravel surface was
eroded for approximately 500'L x 4'W x 0.25'D x 1/27=18.5cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 18.5
=33.7tn
Location#R34 15-2-0.9
GPS:40.00023,-104.90798
The damage at this site was limited to sedimentation of the roadway ditch for a length of approximately 500 LF.
Location#R 35 14.5-21-0.2
GPS:40.09471,-104.86568 to 40.09475,-104.86378
The embankment appeared undamaged.This is a ditch cleanout operation at the site of a 40'L x 18"CMP.The inspection team observed
that the ditches had been cleaned out on both sides of the road for a distance of approximately 530 LF x 2=1060LF.
Location#R 36 5-10-0.8
GPS:40.03727,-104.01784
This location is an asphalt paved road.The asphalt surface was undamaged and there was no apparent damage to the road
embankment.The ditch required cleanout for approximately 1584 LF and replacement of 4-18"arch CMPs that were serving as driveway
culverts.
Location#R37 21-6-0.5
GPS:40.03727,-104.86710
This is the location of a bridge on an asphalt paved road.This site is included in PW WELCO28.
Location#R38 5-42-0
GPS:40.29135,-104.01752
This is the location of a bridge on an asphalt paved road.This location is included in PW WELCO22.
Location#R 39 50-13-0 detour route
GPS:40.34893,-104.94349
This location is being reported in PW WELCO37 as a Category B project.
Location#R40 396-tr-cl
GPS:40.33403,-104.79954 to 40.34173,-104.78400
The damage at this location included the erosion of the gravel road embankment and the surface gravel.Embankment losses were
approximately 5500'L x 2'W x 2.5'D x 1/27=1018.5cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 1018.5=1853.7tn.The gravel
surface was eroded for approximately 5500'L x 24'W x 0.25'D x 1/27=1222.2cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 1222.2cy
=2224.4tn.
Location#R41 44-17-0 detour route
GPS:40.30540,-104.88685 to 40.30571,-104.90558
This location is being reported in PW WELCO37 as a Category B project.
Location#R42 38-9-0.0 detour route
GPS:40.26266,-104.97774 to 40.26284,-104.94169
This location is being reported in PW WELCO37 as a Category B project.
SCOPE OF WORK:
PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00588(0):
This isa continuation of the previous section of Locations 1-20
https://connect I.dhs.gov/emm ie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 37 of 43
COMPLETED WORK
Location#R21 6-55-1.75
GPS:40.02948,-104.51260
The county used their forces,materials and equipment to repair the damage at this location.The damage at this location induded the
erosion of the gravel road embankment and the surface gravel.The embankment loss measured approximately 250'L x 2.5.'W x 2'D x
1/27=46.3 cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 46.3cy yields a volume of 84.3 tn.The gravel surface was eroded for
approximately 250'L x 23'W x 0.25'D x 1/27=53.2cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 53.2cy=96.9tn.
Embankment $33.70 x 84.3 =$2,840.91
Gravel Surfacing$33.70 x 96.9 =$3,265.53
Total $6,106.44 •
Location#R22 4-53-0.3
GPS:40.01502,-104.559324
The county used their forces,materials and equipment to repair the damage at this location.The damage at this location induded the
erosion of the gravel road embankment and the surface gravel.The embankment loss measured approximately 1056'L x 2'W x 1.5'D x
1/27=117.3 cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 117.3.2cy yields a volume of 213.5 tn.The gravel surface was eroded for
approximately 1056'L x 24'W x 0.25'D x 1/27=234.7cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 234.7cy=427.1tn.
Embankment $33.70 x 213.5 =$7,194.95
Gravel Surfacing$33.70 x427.1 =$14,393.27
Total $21,588.22
Location#R23 53-4-0.3
GPS:40.00670,-104.54642
The county used their forces,materials and equipment to repair the damage at this location.The damage at this location included the
erosion of the gravel road embankment and the surface gravel.Embankment damage was confined to the sideslope of the cross section.
The stated dimensions include the use of 0.5 as a multiplier to compute triangular areas.The embankment loss measured approximately
50'L x 1.5'W x 1'D x 1/27=2.8 cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 2.8cy yields a volume of 5.1 tn.The gravel surface
was eroded for approximately 50'L x 27'W x 0.25'D x 1/27=12.5cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 12.5cy=22.8tn.
Embankment $33.70 x 5.1 =$171.87
Gravel Surfacing$33.70 x 22.8=$768.36
Total $940.23
Location#R24 47-SH 52-0.3
GPS:40.07288,-104.62160 to 40.05912,-104.62156
The county used their forces,materials and equipment to repair the damage at this location.The damage at this location induded the
erosion of the gravel road embankment and the surface gravel.Embankment losses were approximately 4918'L x 1.5'W x 1'D x 1/27=
273.2cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 273.2cy=497.3tn.
The gravel surface was eroded for approximately 4918'L x 1'W x 0.25'D x 1/27=45.5cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x
45.5cy=82.9tn.
Embankment $33.70 x 497.3 =$16,759.01
Gravel Surfacing$33.70 x 82.9 =$2,793.73 •
Total $19,552.74
Location#R 25 47-8-0.5
GPS:40.05176,-104.62160
The county used their forces,materials and equipment to repair the damage at this location.The damage at this location included the
erosion of the gravel road embankment and the surface gravel.Embankment losses were approximately 150'L x 3.5'W x 2'D x 1/27=
38.9cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 38.9=70.8tn.The gravel surface was eroded for approximately 150'L x 2'W x
0.25D x 1/27=2.8cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 2.8cy=5.1tn.
Embankment $33.70 x 70.8 =$2,385.96
Gravel Surfacing$33.70 x 5.1 = $170.87
Total $2,557.83
Location#R26/R13 6-61-0.1
GPS:40.02957,-104.49187 to 40.02955,-104.48974
The county used their forces,materials and equipment to repair the damage at this location.The damage at this location included the
erosion of the gravel road embankment and the surface gravel.Embankment losses were approximately 520'L x2'W x 2.5'D x 1/27=
96.3cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 96.3=175.3 tn.The gravel surface was eroded for approximately 520'L x 1'W x
0.25'D x 1/27=4.8cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 4.8cy=8.8tn.This location is reported under identifiers#13 and
#26.This occurred because the location was visited on two occasions.Data were not readily available on the initial visit.In order to
maintain the project specialist's numbering convention the location has dual numbering.The estimated quantities and costs are shown
only once.
Embankment $33.70 x 175.3 =$5,907.61
https://connect I.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 38 of 43
Gravel Surfacing$33.70 x 8.8 =$296.56
Total $6,204.17
Location#R27 20-53-0.5
GPS:40.13131,-10456048
The county used their forces,materials and equipment to repair the damage at this location.The damage at this location included the
erosion of the gravel road embankment and the surface gravel.Embankment losses were approximately 400'L x5'W x 2'D x 1/27
=148.1cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 148.1=269.6tn.The gravel surface was eroded for approximately 400'L x 2'W x
0.25'D x 1/27=7.4cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 7.4cy=13.5tn.
Embankment $33.70 x 269.6 =$9,085.52
Gravel Surfacing$33.70 x 13.5 4454.95
Total $9,540.47
Location#R28 20-51-0.5
GPS 40.13124,-104.57369
The county used their forces,materials and equipment to repair the damage at this location.The damage at this location included the
erosion of the gravel road embankment and the surface gravel.Embankment losses were approximately 1056'L x4'W x3'D x 1/27
=469.3cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 469.3=854.2tn.The gravel surface was eroded for approximately 1056'L x 6'W x
0.25'D x 1/27=58.7cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 58.7cy=106.8tn.
Embankment $33.70 x 854.2 =$28,786.54
Gravel Surfacing$33.70 x 106.8 =$3,599.16
Total $32,385.70
Location#R29 COL-HAR
GPS:40.10462,-104.76903
The county used their forces,materials and equipment to repair the damage at this location.The damage at this location included the
erosion of the gravel road embankment and the surface gravel.Embankment losses were approximately 165'L x 10'W x 2'D x 1/27
=122.2cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 122.2=222.4tn.The gravel surface was eroded for approximately 165'L x 10'W x
0.25'D x 1/27=15.3cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 15.3cy=27.8tn.
Embankment $33.70 x 222.4 =$7,494.88
Gravel Surfacing$33.70 x 27.8 =$936.86
Total $8,431.74
Location#R30 20-31-0.3
GPS:40.13090,-104.76696
The county used their forces,materials and equipment to repair the damage at this location.The damage at this location included the
erosion of the gravel road embankment and the surface gravel.Embankment losses were approximately 4447'L x 2'W x 2.5'D x 1/27
=823.5cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 823.5=1498.8tn.The gravel surface was eroded for approximately 4447'L x 2'W
x 0.25'D x 1/27=82.4cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 82.4cy=149.9tn.
Embankment $33.70 x 1498.8 =$50,509.56
Gravel Surfacing$33.70 x 149.9 =$5.061.63
Total $55,561.19
Location#R31 22.5-US85-0.5 DELETE
GPS:40.15225,-104.82329
An oil company repaired this location because they were eager to gain access to their equipment.The county will not be billed for the
repair.Weld county has requested this location be removed from their claim.See attached E mail.
Location#R32 22-19-23
GPS:40.14531,-104.85108 to 40.14536,-104.86544
The county used their forces,materials and equipment to repair the damage at this location.The damage at this location included the
• erosion of the gravel road embankment and the surface gravel.Embankment losses were approximately 4032'L x 2'W x 1.5'D x 1/27
=448.0cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 448.0=815.4tn.The gravel surface was eroded for approximately 4032'L x 2'W x
0.25'D x 1/27=74.7cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 74.7cy=135.9tn.
Embankment $33.70 x 815.4 =$27,478.98
Gravel Surfacing$33.70 x 135.9 =54.579.83
Total $32,058.81
Location#R33 21-8-1.1
GPS:40.06184,-104.86739
The county used their forces,materials and equipment to repair the damage at this location.The damage at this location included the
erosion of the gravel road embankment and the surface gravel.Embankment losses were approximately 500'L x 7'W x 2'D x 1/27
=259.3cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 259.3=471.9tn.The gravel surface was eroded for approximately 500'L x 4'W x
0.25'D x 1/27=18.5cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 18.5
=33.7tn
https://connectl.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danal 1. h =p t d s.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestinatioado.... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 39 of 43
Embankment $33.70 x 471.9 =$15,903.03
Gravel Surfacing$33.70 x 33.7 41,135.69
Total $17,038.72
Location#R34 15-2-0.9
GPS:40.06184,-104.86739
The county forces and equipment were used to deanout the ditch and restore the flowline.The extent of the deanout was about 500LF.
The project specialist used the FEMA unit price,$3.40/LF cost code(3070),to estimate the cost for ditch deaning/shaping operation.
Cleanout/ditch shaping$3.40 x 500Lf=$1,700
Location#R 35 14.5-21-0.2
GPS:40.09471,-104.86568 to 40.09475,-104.86378
This was a ditch deanout operation at the site of a 401 x 18"CMP.County forces were used to deanout and reestablish the flow line for
the ditches on each side of the road.The combined length of the cleaning operation was 2x 530LF=1060 LF.The project specialist used
the FEMA unit price,$3.40/LF cost code(3070),to estimate the cost for ditch deaning/shaping operation.
Cleanout/shaping $3.4011f x 10601f=$3,604
Location#R 36 5-10-0.8
GPS:40.03727,-104.01784
This location is an asphalt paved road.The inspection team could not identify any obvious repairs to the asphalt surface such as recent
asphalt patches.The county replaced 4—18"arch CMPs driveway culverts totaling 140 LF.The project specialist used the county unit
price of$14.95/Lf to estimate the cost.County forces and equipment were used to deanout and reshape the ditch for a length of
1584LF.The project specialist used the FEMA unit price,$3.40/LF cost code(3070),to estimate the cost for ditch cleaning/shaping
operation.
18"-arch CMP @$14.95 x 140 LF =$2,093
Cleanout/shaping $3.40/If x 1584LF=$5,385.60
TOTAL= $7,478.60
Location#R37 21-6-0.5
GPS:40.03727,-104.86710
This is the location of a bridge on an asphalt paved road.This site is included in PW WELCO28.
Location#R38 5-42-0
GPS:40.29135,-104.01752
This is the location of a bridge on an asphalt paved road.This location is included in PW WELCO22.
Location#R39 50-13-0
GPS:40.34893,-104.94349
This location was a detour route and is included as part of WELCO37.
Location#R40 396-tr-d
GPS:40.33403,-104.79954 to 40.34173,-104.78400
The county used their forces,materials and equipment to repair the damage at this location.The damage at this location included the
erosion of the gravel road embankment and the surface gravel.Embankment losses were approximately 5500'L x 2'W x 2.5'D x 1/27
=1018.5cy. Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 1018.5=1853.7tn.The gravel surface was eroded for approximately 5500'L x
24W x 0.25'O x 1/27=1222.2cy.Using the conversion factor of 1.82 tns/cu yd x 1222.2cy=2224.4tn.
Embankment $33.70 x 1,853.7 =$62,469.69
Gravel Surfacing$33.70 x 2,224.4 =$74,962.28
Total $137,431.97
Location#R 41 44-17-0 DETOUR ROUTE
GPS:40.30540,-104.88685 to 40.30571,-104.90558
This location is being reported in PW WELCO37 as a category B project.
Location#R42 38-9-0.0 DETOUR ROUTE
GPS:40.26266,-104.97774 to 40.26284,-104.94169
This location is being reported in PW WELCO37 as a category B project.
END OF SCOPE OF WORK
Weld County Project Notes these notes apply to all 42 Locations.
1. Following the September 2013 flooding,applicant used contract services and/or force account resources to re-open roads/bridges and
repair damage as soon as possible. At several damage sites,repairs appear to have returned the facility to its pre-disaster design,
function and capacity with no known remaining work to be completed. However at other sites due to the onset of winter conditions,
applicant was unable to complete the restoration,thus leaving work to be completed. Finally,at some sites,applicant has expressed
concern that unanticipated work may be still be required as a result of conditions beyond their control,such as possible subsequent
settlement resulting from saturated soil conditions following the flood or where high water levels or erosion/deposition prevented a
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emm ie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 40 of 43
complete damage assessment.
2. This PW addresses all validated flood related damages at the specified site(s),including completed work and work to be completed
(which damages were known to the applicant and reported to FEMA by the effective date of this PW). In the event that applicant identifies
subsequent,currently unknown flood related damage at such site(s),applicant is advised to contact the State of Colorado Office of
Emergency Management to report the damage and request an inspection prior to its repair. In the event that the State validates the
damage as a direct result of the September 2013 flooding,the State will request FEMA prepare a version of this PW to address the
eligible cost of repair.
3.As described in 44 CFR Section 13.42,applicant must maintain all work-related records for a period of three(3)years from applicant
closure(final payment). All records relative to this project worksheet are subject to examination and audit by the State,FEMA,and the
Comptroller General of the United States and must reflect work related to disaster specific costs.
4.The applicant must obtain all required federal,state,and local permits prior to the commencement of work.
5.The subgrantee is requesting direct administrative costs that are directly chargeable to this specific project. Associated eligible work is
related to administration of the PA project only and in accordance with 44 CFR 13.22. These costs are treated consistently and uniformly
as direct costs in all federal awards and other subgrantee activities and are not included in any approved indirect costs.
6.Project inspection team included the 406 Hazard Mitigation staff members. Repairs had been completed at the time of the inspections
and no opportunities were identified.
7.The applicant is aware that all projects are subject to an insurance review as stated in 44 C.F.R.Sections 206.252 and 206.253.If
applicable,an insurance determination will be made either as anticipated proceeds or actual proceeds in accordance with the applicant's
insurance policy that may affect the total amount of the project.
8.The applicant is required to adhere to State and Federal Government Procurement rules and regulations and maintain adequate
records to support the basis for all purchasing of goods and materials and contracting services for projects approved under the Public
Assistance program,as stated in 44 CFR 13.36.The applicant has advised they have/will follow their normal procurement procedures.
9.All calculated quantities have been rounded to the nearest tenth of the applicable unit,i.e.,tons,cubic yards.Minor discrepancies in
quantities or costs are the result of rounding.
10.The Weld County employee pay policy and the Weld County procurement policy are on file in EMMIE.
11.The county measures its quantities in terms of tons.Field measured quantities were computed in cubic yards.The Weld County
Engineering and Construction Criteria document specifies materials densities of 1461bs/cu ft for Hot Mix Asphalt and 1351b/cu ft for
embankment.The project specialist used these densities to compute conversion factors to apply to the cubic yard computations.For the
Hot Mix Asphalt the factor is 1461b/cu ft x 27 cu ft/cu yd x 1/2000 lb/ton=1.97 tn/cy.For the embankment fill material the calculation is
1351b/ct x 27 cu ft/cu yd x 1/2000 Ib/tn=1.82 to/cu yd.The field measured quantities were multiplied by their respective conversion factors
to yield quantities in tons.A Colorado DOT(CDOT) unit cost of$33.70/tn was used for estimating the in-place repair costs.This is twice
the CDOT Item Number 304-06000 Aggregate Base Course Class 6.This cost was used because of expected economies of scale as
compared to the CDOT figures.
12.The applicant expects to claim Direct Administrative Costs for this PW.The DAC charges were not available at the time of PW
preparation.The project specialist added an estimate as a temporary measure to preserve the opportunity to claim DAC when the final
figures become available.
13 Applicant has completed a substantial percentage of the work but will not have cost data available within the fourteen day Pocket
Guide rule.Per Field Operations Pocket Guide,Section 7,Cost Estimates,Page 26,"If the applicant has not produced cost data within
two weeks of the site inspection,the Project Specialist will prepare the PW on the basis of an estimate for the work accomplished".
Applicant,CO State representative and FEMA personnel jointly conducted all inspections and agreed to use CDOT costs for in-place
costs to derive estimates on this project worksheet.Applicant understands that all actual support documentation,invoices,FA records,
contract and proof of payment will be required for final reconciliation and/or closeout process.
Does the Scope of Work change the pre-disaster conditions
at the site? Yes No Special Considerations included? r Yes J'..No
Hazard Mitigation proposal included? !Yes "/'No Is there insurance coverage on this facility? Yes J No
PROJECT COST
ITEM CODE NARRATIVE QUANTITY/UNIT UNIT COST
PRICE
***Version 0***
Work Completed
1 9999 class 6 gravel fill 14444.6/TON $33.70 $486,783.02
2 9999 18" CMP arch 140/LF $ 14.95 $2,093.00
3 3070 Ditch Cleaning &Shaping 3144/LF $ 3.40 $ 10,689.60
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,S S L+d ispatchDestination,do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 41 of 43
4 0000 Insurance Adjustments-5900/5901 0/LS $ 0.00 $0.00
***Version 0***
5 9999 Direct Administrative Costs-estimated 1/LS 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00
TOTAL $500,565.62
COST
PREPARED BY STEPHEN A MORENO TITLE Project Specialist SIGNATURE
APPLICANT REP.Roy Rudisill TITLE Director-OEM SIGNATURE
WELD(COUNTY) : PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00688
Conditions Information
Review Name Condition Type Condition Name Description Monitored Status
This review does not
address all federal, state
and local requirements.
Acceptance of federal
funding requires recipient to
Final Review Other(EHP) Standard comply with all federal, state No Approved
Condition#2 and local laws. Failure to
obtain all appropriate
federal, state and local
environmental permits and
clearances may jeopardize
federal funding.
Any change to the approved
Standard scope of work will require
Final Review Other(EHP) Condition#1 re-evaluation for compliance No Approved
with NEPA and other Laws
and Executive Orders.
National Historic
Final Review Other(EHP) Preservation Act No Approved
(NHPA)
Applicant is responsible for
Executive Order coordinating with the local
floodplain manager.All
Final Review Other(EHP) 11988- required permits should be No Approved
Floodplains maintained as part of the
permanent record.
Debris must be
State Hazardous
appropriately separated and
Final Review Other(EHP) Materials and No Approved
Solid Waste Laws disposed of in an approved
disposal site or landfill.
Final Review Other(EHP) Standard If ground disturbing No Approved
Condition#3 activities occur during
construction, applicant will
monitor ground disturbance
and if any potential
archeological resources are
discovered,will immediately
cease construction in that
https://connect 1.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 42 of 43
WELD(COUNTY) : PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00588
Conditions Information
area and notify the State
and FEMA.
This review does not
address all federal, state
and local requirements.
Acceptance of federal
funding requires recipient to
EHP Review Other EHP Standard comply with all federal, state
( ) Condition#2 and local laws. Failure to No Recommended
obtain all appropriate
federal, state and local
environmental permits and
clearances may jeopardize
federal funding.
Any change to the approved
Standard scope of work will require
EHP Review Other(EHP) Condition#1 re-evaluation for compliance No Recommended
with NEPA and other Laws
and Executive Orders.
National Historic
EHP Review Other(EHP) Preservation Act No Recommended
(NHPA)
Applicant is responsible for
Executive Order coordinating with the local
EHP Review Other(EHP) 11988- floodplain manager. All
required permits should be No Recommended
Floodplains maintained as part of the
permanent record.
State Hazardous Debris must be
EHP Review Other(EHP) Materials and appropriately separated and No Recommended
Solid Waste Laws disposed of in an approved
disposal site or landfill.
If ground disturbing
activities occur during
construction, applicant will
monitor ground disturbance
EHP Review Other EHP Standard and if any potential
( ) Condition#3 archeological resources are No Recommended
discovered, will immediately
cease construction in that
area and notify the State
and FEMA.
Internal Comments
No. Queue User Date/Time Reviewer Comments
Award 03-03-2014
5 Review SYSTEM 11:45 PM ACCEPTED
GMT
4 Final PALACIO 02-28-2014 Note:Applicant, CO State representative and FEMA personnel
Review JOSE 05:29 PM jointly conducted all inspections and agreed to use CDOT costs
GMT for in-place costs to derive estimates on this project
https://connect l.dhs.gov/emmie/,DanaInfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 43 of 43
Internal Comments
No. Queue User Date/Time Reviewer Comments
worksheet.Final Reviewer finds eligible the application and
approves the funding of this CAT-C project worksheet based on
the applicant having performed all required procurement
procedures, perform all required special considerations
recommendations such as permits to address EHP
considerations and securing all actual cost documentation for
the financial reconciliation of this project. Task Force Leader-
J. Palacio 02/28/2014
Category: C, 95% Complete, Weld County, Weld County.
Applicant used force labor and equipment to repair roads using
gravel at sites 1, 2, 4, 8, 10, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25,
26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 32, 33,40.Applicant repaired embankment
at sites 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19,
20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 32, 33,40. Applicant
clean out and shaped ditch at sites 34, 35, 36. Applicant
replaced and repair culvert at site 36. Applicant must get an
approved landfill permit or must be disposed of in an approved
disposal site. Mitigation-None- bsherma1 - 02/24/2014
15:13:07 GMT
Project site work is not in a mapped wetland.- bsherma1 -
02/24/2014 15:01:06 GMT
Entire community will benefit from the project. - bsherma1 -
02-25-2014 02/24/2014 15:01:42 GMT
3 EHP PATTERSON 09:59 PM Threatened and Endangered Species occur in this county but
Review MOLLY GMT the type of activity proposed on this Project Worksheet has
been determined to have"no effect" on any T&E species. This
Project occurs 500 ft or more away from a wetland, river,
stream, lake, canal or drainage. (or This Project falls within a
block clearance zone for the Preble's Meadow Jumping
Mouse)- bshermal -02/24/2014 15:09:30 GMT
Work involves removal, staging, transporting, and/or disposal of
debris. (Includes culverts) - bshermal - 02/24/2014 15:13:39
GMT
Project is located on a non-printed panel number
0802661050C. Project is located on a non-printed panel
number 0802661075C. - bshermal -02/24/2014 14:54:49 GMT
The scope of work has been reviewed and meets the criteria of
the 2013 signed Programmatic Agreement, Item III; Section B,
C, E agreed to by FEMA and the SHPO.- bshermal -
02/24/2014 15:04:08 GMT
Mitigation DROST 02-21-2014 This repair/restoration project has been reviewed for mitigation
2 09:26 PM opportunities but there is no opportunity because work has
Review BRIAN GMT been completed- Brian W. Drost, 406 Specialist
02-21-2014 Applicant is insinured through the CCCPP risk pool. That
1 Insurance GILLIAM 02:29 PM policy specifically excludes roadways from coverage.
Review ROBERT GMT Insurance proceeds are not anticipated, and there is no
insurance O&M for roads.
https://connect I.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 3/5/2014
Hello