Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout780511.tiff RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves MINUTES WELD COUNTY HOME RULE CHARTER AMENDMENT STUDY COMMITTEE The Weld County Home Rule Charter Amendment Study Committee met in regular session in the Third Floor Conference Room of the Weld County Centennial Center, Greeley, Colorado, on Wednesdgy, February 15th, 1978, at the hour of 7:00 P.M. ROLL CALL: The meeting was called to order by Chairman Gordon Lacy. On roll call, the following members were present, constituting a quorum of the members thereof: Gordon Lacy, Chairman Dick Boettcher Verdie Peddycord Blair Macy Barbara Sloan Helen Norton John Kunzman Absent: William Butler & Wayne Brown ALSO PRESENT: Two Members of the League of Women Voters, Members of the Press, Secretary Sandy Moorhouse. MINUTES APPROVED: Gordon Joey said he had one correction to be made to the minutes of January 18th, 1978. On the third page, paragraph three, Mr. Joey would like the first sentence clarified to read "No li specialpublic meeting to present the proposed amendments will be held as discussed at a previous meeting." He stated that as the minutes read it implies that the Charter Study Committee's meetings are not open to the public, which is not correct. All Charter Study Committee meetings are open to the public. A motion was made and seconded to approve the minutes of January 18th, 1978 as corrected. Gordon Lacy said he would like clarification from County Attorney Tom David on the number of amendments that can. be placed on the ballot this fall. Verdie Peddycord had an article from the "Greeley Tribune" in which Mr. David was quoted as saying the number of possible amendments is unlimited. Becaise Mr. David was not in attendance at this time, the Committee decided to proceed with the wetting until he arrived to answer the question. Becky Edgerton of the League.of Women Voters.read a statement from the League. (see attached) Mr. Joey thanked Ms. Fdgerton and said he agreed with their recommendations. At this time, the Committee began going over the 19 items of concern discussed during the proceeding. 1. Article III, Board of County Commissioners, Section 3-4, TERMS OF OFFICE. (Also discussed in relation to boards and commissions appointed by the Commissioners) Verdie Peddycord stated she thought this section was a valid portion of the Charter and recommended no changes be made. John Kunzman disagreed saying he thought it was telling the citizens who they could vote for in an election. He also stated it would eliminate a number of qualified people who would run for elective office.brttr:heeaOSe they woild.have to give up their"jobs to serve for only eight years would decide-not to do so. Many would have no job to return to. Another matter he suggested they consider was the low salary of the elected officials. Dick Boettcher said he thought this should be left up to the voters and not restricted by the Charter. Blair Macy said eliminating this section could make county government more efficient but could also make it possible for one person to become too powerful in an elective office. Chairman Lary explained that he found in serving on the Board of Adjustments that if someone did a good job, was willing to devote the time and energy to attend the meetings and would like to continue serving, 780511 A" . RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves Page 2 February 15, 1978 it was unfair not to allow him to do so. He said he wholeheartedly disagreed with this section of the Charter. Chairman Lacy set the format for the remainder of the meeting at this time. He asked that the Committee discuss each item and then he would call for a motion. Each committee member present would vote their convictions on the individual items. Mr. Lary asked for further discussion on item number one and there being none, called for a motion. Dick Boettcher moved to amend this section removing the restrictions on serving only two consecutive te.nia. John K„nzman seconded the notion and on roll call the Committee members voted as follows: Gordon Lacy Yes John Kunanan Yes. Dick Boettcher Yes Blair Macy No Verdie Peddycord No Helen Norton No Barbara Sloan No The motion was defeated. Verdie Peddycord asked about the votes of those members not attending this meeting. Chairman lacy said that Wayne Brown had contacted Sandy Moorhouse, informing her that he would not be able to attend this meeting but would forward his comments to her so they could be sent out with next months minutes. In answer to Ms. Peddycord's question, he replied that all members were aware of the agenda for this evening's meeting and he thought decisions should be made at this meeting. He stated they would be voted on democratically but he did not feel they could delay the decisions any longer. Dick Boettcher pointed out that if the two members not present felt strongly enough about - a certain decision they could ask for reconsideration at a later meeting. 2. Article III, Board of County Commissioners, Section 3-8, POWERS AND DUTIES (4) (b). Enacting legislation by the ordinance procedure. (contracts) Ms. Peddycord made reference to the minutes of November 16th and the amendments offered by the County Attorney's Office. She questioned why the Cannittee Members had felt the second amendment was needed. After a short discussion, it was decided the second paragraph adding to Section 3-8 (4) (m) was covered in another part of the charter and was not needed. Ms. Peddycord then made a motion to change paragraph (4) (b) only but deleting the word contracts. Barbara Sloan seconded the notion. Dick Boettcher stated concerns about the section relating to the disposition of real property. He asked if the county was governed by state statute in this matter. No attorney was present at this time but Gordon Lary stated it seemed like the county would be govened by state law. Mr. Boettcher then said he saw no need for this portion to be included in the Charter. Blair Macy said he would like to see it included even if the county was governed by the state statute. This question will be referred to Mr. David upon his arrival at the mooting. Blair Macy expressed misgivings about contracts made when a new position or new duties were created. He said the new position or duties may not prove very important but he thought the citizens should be aware of them. Mr. lacy replied he thought this would be taken care of under the Personnel policies. N° RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves FORM•0 C.f.RECNEL B.B.N t.ll. Page 3 February 15, 1978 2. Article III, Board of County Commissioners, Section 3-8, POWERS AND DUTIES (4) (b). (Continued) On motion duly made and seconded a vote was taken and it passed unanimously to amend Section 3-8, (4) (b) by eliminating the word "contracts" to read as follows: (b) Enact legislation including such means of enforcement thereof as shall be authorized bylaw, and otherwise formally promulgate county policy. Unless otherwise required by statute, the Board shall act only by ordinance in matters of legislation, eeatraets, appropriations, and disposition of real property, and by ordinance, resolution or motions, as may be appropriate, in other matters. 3. Article III, Board of County Commissioners, Section 3-8, POWERS AND DUTIES (4) (n). The Board of Appeals. Gordon Lacy informed the Committee that this question arose concerning a Board of Adjustments matter. The Board received a ruling stating that the Board of County Commissioners served as the Board of Appeals by state law and the Home Rule Charter. He said this concern had also been clarified in the County Grievance Procedure that was recently revised and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners. Blair Macy moved and Helen Norton seconded a notion to make no change in this section of the Charter. The motion passed unanimously. 4. Article III, Board of County Commissioners, Section 3-8, POWERS AM) DUTIES (4) (r). Town Meetings Rural Conferences. Bnrbara Sloan said she felt the Commissioners had taken care of this concern by scheduling ' monthly meetings . with the town council of the various incorporated towns during the year. Blair Macy mentioned he had attended the meeting held in Kccnesburg last year and found it very beneficial. Verdie Peddycord made a motion to make no change in this section of the charter. Rnrbara Sloan seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. 5. Article IV, Departments of County Government, Section 4-2, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE, CENTRAL PURCHASING AND PERSONNEL (B) (2) (f). Running for elective office. John Kunzman stated he objected to this paragraph because it was discriminatory to county employees. Verdie Peddycord agreed and said she thought elected officials and county employees should be governed by the same regulations. Blair Macy said this type of regulation is not required in private business. Mr. Kunzman pointed out that the county could be the loser because qualified employees may take a leave of absense, lose the election and then not return to their job with the county. Dick Boettcher disagreed stating if the employee was retained in the position during the election campaign it could cause a great deal of disharmony in the county office. After further discussion, Helen Norton made a motion to delete the second sentence of paragraph (f) to read as follows: N° RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves EO4Y y C.E.OOECNEL 0.0.0 L.L]. Page 4 February 15, 1978 5. (Cont. ) (f) No employee shall, during working hours, engage in any political activity. Any-peroon-eapleyed-w4th-the countyr-eneept-an-eleeted e;fie*al--whe-oecks eleet4ex-#e-a- tie4an-gab€e-e €gee; shall ruse#;-a-leave-a€-abeenee--withent-pay>-immedia€eIy-aTter-annettneem ent e€-hio eandidaey. Blair Macy seconded the motion and on roll call the votes were as follows: Gordon Lacy No Blair Macy Yes Dick Boettcher No Helen Norton Yes Verdie Peddycord Yes Barbara Sloan No John Kunanan Yes The motion passed on a 4-3 vote. 6. Article IV, Departments of County Government, Section 4-4, DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES (f). Wording is vague. After a short discussion,the Committee members stated they did not have problems with this section and on motion duly made and seconded voted to make no change in this section of the Charter. 7. Article IV, Departments of County Government, Section 4-5, DEPARThENr OF ENGINEERING SERVICES (1) Qualifications. Rewritten to help in hiring. County Attorney Tan David is now present at the meeting. Also attending are Glenn K. Billings and Ron Cooke an attorney from Denver. The questions that were discussed earlier in the evening were directed to Mr. David for clarification. Mr. David stated the number of amendments that can be put on the ballot is unlimited. (Please see his written opinion that is attached for details) Dick Boettcher asked for his comments concerning the disposal of real property by the ordinance procedure. Tan David said the county does follow the state statute on tax foreclosures only. He stated he had no problem with the disposition of real property through the ordinance procedure as stated in the Home Rule Charter. Mr. Boettcher asked if the county advertised the property owned by the county but not bound by tax foreclosures. Mr. David assured him the county does advertise all surplus property. The Committee members then returned to item number seven for discussion and a decision. Gordon Lacy said the problem area seemed to be in the quote "shall be licensed or shall be eligible for licensd' . He asked if this meant the County Engineer must be licensed or just qualified to be licensed. Glenn Billings explained that by state statute the County Engineer must be licensed before he can use the title "County Engineer" on letterhead, etc•: He said he believed the intent of the paragraph by the Charter Commission was to include this in case an engineer was hired from out of state it would give him time to become licensed in the state of Colorado. NO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves Pogo•o C.r.FQECN[L X.9.e L.o. _ Page 5 February 15, 1978 7. (CONTINUED) Helen Norton Roved and Verdie Peddycord seconded a motion to make no change in this section of the Charter. The vote was taken and carried unanimously. 8. Article IV, Departments of County Government, Section 4-6, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATION SERVICES. Addition of the County Library under this department. Barbara Sloan said that Commissioner Norman Carlson had contacted her on this matter. He suggested this change be made to bring the Library Board into conformity with the other county boards and ccnnissions. Ms. Sloan pointed out that the Library Board seemed to be functioning adequately at this time and had not notified the Committee of any problems. She said she did not have a great deal of concern in changing this section. Verdie Peddycord made a motion that the Committee make no change and Barbara Sloan seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. 9. Article V, Department of Law, Section 5-2, QUALIFICATIONS. Rewritten to help in hiring. This has been an area of much discussion by the Comnittee during the year. The Corm:i.tte members decided to change the wording of the paragraph to read as follows: The County Attorney shall be a resident of the County of Weld and an attorney duly licensed by the State of Colorado for at least five (5) years immediately prior to his appointment, and shall have been actively engaged in the practice during such five years. Ms. Peddycrod moved and Barbara Sloan seconded the notion to amend this section of the charter as stated above for clarification purposes. The motion carried unanimously. 10. Article V, Department of Law, Section 5-3, DUTIES (3). Formal written opinions. Tom David explained this section makes it difficult as it presently reads to protect the attorney-client privilege. He said his office has gone around the Charter by issuing informal opinions which are not required to be made public : He would like.the Charter amended to protect the attorney-client privilege. Helen Norton asked if there were instances where the opinions should be made public. Mr. David said there could be. Ron Cooke said this should not be mandatory but discrestionary. Dick Boettcher made a motion to change this section as stated below: The County Attorney shall, upon request of elective county officers, issue formal-written opinions on questions of law; ( . ) wkieh-ehafl-be-ea atned by-the-Getntty-as-pue 4e doeumente, Barbara Sloan seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. N2 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves Page 6 February 15, 1978 11. Article V, Department of Law, Section 5-3, DUTIES (5) Representing the County Commissioners and/or County Council in a dispute. Ron Cooke pointed out that the County could not require the District Attorney who is a state official to act in any capacity as stated in the Home Rule Charter. Mr. lacy suggested the addition of a statement such as "such county officials may be represented by Counsel of his own choice". It was the general consensus of the Committee members that this section was needed and should be retained. They felt it could work as it reads now. Verdie Peddycord made a motion to make no change in this section. Helen Norton seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. 12. Article V, Department of Law, Section 5-4, SPECIAL COUNSEL. Should special counsel be hired through the ordinance or resolution procedure. After a short discussion, the Committee members decided to make no change in this section. It was their opinion that with the change recommended in the ordinance procedure,the problem would be solved. On motion duly made and seconded, the notion passed uananimously to make no changes in the portion of the Charter. 13. Article VI, Elective Officers, Section 6-1, ELECTIVE OFFICERS. Should the Coroner and/or Sheriff be appointed instead of elected. The majority of the Committee members felt this section should remain the sane. Dick Boettcher pointed out that he did not believe an office as large as the Sheriff's should be elective but should be under the control of the Board of County Commissioners. He stated he sees a day in the future when this will be an appointed office but did not move for a change at this time. Barbara Sloan made a motion to make no changes in the section of the Charter. Blair Macy seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. 14. Article VI, Elective Officers, Section 6-6, COMPENSATION. Setting salaries for elected officials. The Study Committee realized a need for a deadline for setting.the salaries of elected officials especially in election years. There was some discussion of where the responsibility should be, the County Council or the County Commissioners. Glenn Billings suggested they consider having the Board of Commissioners set the. Salaries. He said they are usually the lowest paid of all county officials and it would keep them responsible to the voters. He also suggested they be set yearly. Consideration of a cost of living increase was also discussed. Helen Norton Suggested that they should at least consider the state minimum figure in their discussion. Ron Cooke said the state minimums are purely political decisions. Mr. Billings responded by saying he thought elected officials salaries should be completely out of the political process. Blair Macy stated Ni fl RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves Page 7 February 15, 1978 14. (CONTINUED) although the alternatives discussed do have merit, he does not want the decision making authority taken from the County Council at this point. Barbara Sloan made a motion to hold this matter over for further discussion at the next meeting. Dick Boettcher seconded the notion and it carried unanimously. 15. Article VII, County Assessor, Section 7-3, CHIEF DEPUTY, and Article XI, County Treasurer, Section 11-3, CHIEF DEPUTY. Qualifications. • Helen Norton said the County Treasurer Mike Loustalet felt the requirements were too restrictive. He had stated that with the qualifications listed it would be difficult to find someone to fill the job and accept the salary the county paid. Mike suggested they take out the sections entirely. Mr. Lacy said the salary mus something the Committee could do nothing about. . Verdie Peddycord made the motion for no change in this section and Helen Norton seconded the motion. It carried unanimously. 16. Article VIII, County Council, Section 13-8, POWERS AND DUTIES. Review for changes. Helen Norton made a motion and Verdie Peddycord seconded it to discuss this section at a future meeting. The motion passed unanimously. 17. Article XIV, Finance and Budget, Section 14-9, BIDDING PROCEDURES. Th ergency Bidding Procedures (Election Ballots, Floods, etc. ) Gordon Lary said he thought a future discussion of this item should be undertaken. Verdie Peddycord made a motion to discuss this at another meeting, Barbara Sloan seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. 18. Article XIV, Finance and Budget, Section 14-7, LIMITATIONS ON ANNUAL TAX LEVY. Review for changes. Barbara Sloan made a motion for no change in this section. Verdie Peddycord seconded the notion. • Dick Boettcher requested further discussion on this item because he felt.the 5% limitation was too low. He said with the cost of living increasing even the 7% set by the state may be too low. Gordon Lacy called for a vote on the motion and the vote was as follows: Gordon J Lacy No Blair Macy No Verdie Peddycord Yes Dick Boettcher No Barbara Sloan Yes Helen Norton Yes John Kunzman No The notion was defeated-on a 4-3 vote. Dick Boettcher new. made a notion to consider this section at a future date. John Kunnnan seconded the notion and it passed -unanimously. 19. Article XVI, General Provisions, Section 16-9, CONFLICT OF INTEREST. Different than state statute. N ? RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves FORM`0 C.F.XVCCNEL P.P,fl CJ. Page 8 19. - (CONTINUED) Barbara Sloan made a motion to discuss this at a future meeting and Verdie Peddycord seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. The Committee will hold its next meeting on Wednesday, March 15th in the Third Floor Conference Room of the Centennial Center beginning at 7:00 P.M. On notion duly made and seconded, and there being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:10 P.M. APPROVED: WELD COUNTY HOME RULE CHARTER AMENDMEN�_STUD rralb Vice-Chairman No Hello