HomeMy WebLinkAbout20140425.tiff P
Applicant Name: Application Title:
WELD(COUNTY) WELCO08 Various County Roads-Gravel and Paved
Period of Performance Start: Period of Performance End:
03-14-2015
Bundle Reference#(Amendment#) Date Awarded
Subgrant Application - FEMA Form 90-91
FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
PROJECT WORKSHEET
DISASTER PROJECT NO. PAID NO. DATE CATEGORY
WELCO08 123-99123- 02-04-2014 C
FEMA 4145 - DR -CO 00
APPLICANT:WELD(COUNTY) WORK COMPLETE AS OF:
01-23-2014:95%
Site 1of1
DAMAGED FACILITY:
COUNTY: Weld
Various County Roads-Gravel and Paved
LOCATION: LATITUDE: LONGITUDE:
40.78342 -104.80159
Current Version:
Various County Roads shown below as Locations 1 through 21. Each location has a GPS listed
for the damaged area.
DAMAGE DESCRIPTION AND DIMENSIONS:
Current Version:
During the incident period of September 11,2013 through September 30.2013,the declared severe storms caused flooding,landslides and
mudslides throughout Weld County in Colorado. The gravel roads sustained damages from overtopping of roads,high water levels In
drainage ditches and overloaded culverts. Damages commonly consisted of shoulder and embankment erosion,washout of road base and
aggregate surfacing. This PW describes 21 damaged road locations. Total damages at the 21 locations include total aggregate loss of
7499.14 Tons and asphalt pavement loss of 186 Tons. Damages to culverts and bridges are covered under separate PWs. [Refer to
Scope Notes 10 and 11 for cost and conversion factors.]
Location#1 Road EM-110-27-.5
Begin GPS:40.78342.-104.80159 End GPS:40.78334,-104.80379
Floodmap#0802660175C[Panel not printed]
Dimension: Road:585LF x 22FT wide x 0.33FT deep/27=157CY x 1.82=287T
Embankment: (1.5FT wide x 1.5FT deep/2)x 2 sides x 585FT long/27=49CY x 1.82=89T
Damage: Road surface and embankment erosion[both sides]caused aggregate loss of 376T. No damage to CMP.
Location#2 Road EM-27-110-.8
Begin GPS:40.80214.-104.81049 End GPS:40.80310,-104.81047
Floodmap#08026501750[Panel not printed]
Dimension: Road:340LF x 22FT wide x 0.33FT deep/27=91 CY x 1.82=167T
Embankment: (1.5FT wide x 3FT deep/2)x 2 sides x 340FT long/27=57CY x 1.82=103T
Damage: Road surface and embankment erosion[both sides]caused aggregate loss of 270T. No damage to CMP.
Location#3 Road EM-108-27-.5
Begin GPS:40.76863,-104.79212 End GPS:40.76863,-104.79316
Floodmap#0802660175C[Panel not printed]
Dimension: Road:275LF x 22FT wide x 0.33FT deep/27=74CY x 1.82=135T
Embankment: (2FT wide x 1.53FT deep/2)x 2 sides x 275FT long/27=31CY x 1.82=551
Damage: Road surface and embankment erosion[both sides]caused aggregate loss of 190T. No damage to CMP.
Location#4 Road EM-94-43-.0
2014-0425
6),144,vii- 01:€4,166 ('2-4;2-`22°11) ;2 2e,061-/5
Begin GPS:40.66800,-104.65839 End GPS:40.66768,-104.65836
Floodmap#0802660350C[Panel not printed]
Dimension: Road:100LF x 6FT wide x 0.67FT deep/27=15CY x 1.82=27T
Embankment: (3.5FT wide x 2FT deep/2)x 1 side x 115FT long/27=15CY x 1.82=27T
Damage: Road surface and embankment erosion[1 side]caused aggregate loss of 54T. No damage to CMP.
Location#5 Road EM-90-15-.1 [9 locations through 90-19-3.3 approximately 150LF each total 1350LF at the following locations:90-15-,1,
90-15-,5,90-15-/,90-15-.8,90-15-,9,90-15-1.1,90-15-1.5,90-19-3.1,and 90-15-3.3]
Begin GPS:40.63944,-104.91761 End GPS:40.63954,-104.82288
Floodmap#0802660325C Dated 9/28/82[not in floodplain]
Dimension: Road: 1350LF x 24FT wide x 0.33FT deep/27=396CY x 1.82=722T
Embankment: (2FT wide x 3FT deep/2)x 1 side x 1350FT long/27=150CY x 1.82=273T
Damage: Road surface and embankment erosion[1 side]caused aggregate loss of 995T
Location#6 Road EM-15-90-.5[6 locations through 15-90-2.8 approximately 150LF each total 900LF at the following locations:15-90-.5,
15-90-.8,15-90-1.6,15-90-2.1,15-90-2.5,and 15-90-2.8]
Begin GPS:40.66952,-104.92444 End GPS:40.67924,-104.92428
Floodmap#0802660325C dated 9/28/82[not in floodplain]
Dimension: Road:900LF x 24FT wide x 0.33FT deep/27=264CY x 1.82=481T
Embankment: (3FT wide x 3FT deep/2)x 1 side x 900FT long/27=150CY x 1.82=273T
Damage: Road surface and embankment erosion[2 sides]caused aggregate loss of 754T
Location#7 Road EM-61-76-.0(.1)
Begin GPS:40.5425,-104,48934 End GPS:40.54170,-104.48931
Floodmap#080266052C[Panel not printed]
Dimension: Road:280LF x 24FT wide x 0.35FT deep/27=87CY x 1.82=1591
Embankment: (1.5FT wide x 2FT deep/2)x 1 side x 280FT long/27=16CY x 1.82=28T
Damage: Road surface and embankment erosion[1 side]caused aggregate loss of 187T
Location#8 Road EM-71-80-2.1
Begin GPS:40.59829,-104.3941 End GPS:40.59962,-104.39398
Floodmap#0802660525C[Panel not printed]
Dimension: Road:200LF x 24FT wide x 0.25FT deep/27=44CY x 1.82=81T
Embankment: (3FT wide x 2FT deep/2)x 1 side x 470FT long/27=52CY x 1.82=95T
Embankment: (1.5FT wide x 1.5FT deep/2)x 1 side x 470FT long/27=20CY x 1.82=36T
Damage: Road surface and embankment erosion[2 sides]caused aggregate loss of 212T
Location#9 Road EM-74-392-2.1
Begin GPs:40.52289,-104.37213 End GPS:40.52291,-104.37007
Floodmap#0802660525C[Panel not printed]
Dimension: Embankment: (2.5FT wide x 2FT deep/2)x 1 side x 550FT long/27=51CY x 1.82=93T
Damage: Road embankment erosion[1 side]caused aggregate loss of 93T
Location#10 Road EM-68-69-2.1
Begin GPS:40.47926,-104.37498 End GPS:40.47928,-104.37396
Floodmap#0802660675C dated 9/28/82[not in floodplain]
Dimension: Road:275LF x 25FT wide x 0.6FT deep/27=153CY x 1.82=279T
Embankment: (1FT wide x 1FT deep/2)x 1 side x 275FT long/27=5CY x 1.82=9T
Magnesium Chloride: 275LF x 1 gal/LF=275 gal.
Damage: Road surface and embankment erosion[1 side]caused aggregate loss of 288T
Location#11 Road EM-72-31-.4
Begin GPS:40.51011,-104.76512 End GPS:40.51013,-104.76553
Floodmap#0802660475O dated 9/22/99[not in floodplain]
Dimension: Road:110LF x 24FT wide x 0.5FT deep/27=49CY x 1.82=89T
Embankment: (1FT wide x 1FT deep/2)x 2 sides x 110FT long/27=4CY x 1.82=7T
Damage: Road surface and embankment erosion[2 sides]caused aggregate loss of 96T
Location#12 Road EM-51-58-.5
Begin GPS:40,41366,-104.58353 End GPS:40.41467,-104.58355
Floodmap#0802660645C dated 9/28/82[not in floodplain]
Dimension: Road:100LF x 6FT wide x 3FT deep/27=67CY x 1.82=1221
Embankment: (3FT wide x 3FT deep/2)x 1 side x 312FT long/27=52CY x 1.82=95T
Damage: Road surface and embankment erosion[1 side]caused aggregate loss of 217T
Location#13 Road EM-45-54.5-.2
Note: According to the Weld County consultant[Base Tactical]EM-45-54.5-.2 covers cleaning of the ditch just south of Hwy 34 on CR 45.
This work is incidental to the culvert repair where this ditch goes under CR45. Therefore,this work is not covered under this PW but is
covered under the Weld County Culverts PW#WELCO35.
Location#14 Road Em-43-54-.2(Road repaired by Oil Company]
Begin GPS:40.38126,-104.65891 Mid GPS:40.38472,-104.65888
End GPS:40.38678,-104.65834
Floodmap#0802660639O dated 9/28/82 Floodplain Zone A4
Dimension: Road:1960LF x 18FT wide/9=3920SY
Damage: Road surface and embankment erosion both sides caused aggregate loss. Applicant indicated that Oil Company repaired road
and embankment at the Oil Company's cost. No material cost incurred by Applicant only labor and equipment for supervision and grading.
Location#15 Road EM-388-53-.25[Paved]
Begin GPS:40.41037,-104.54981 End GPS:40.41370,-104.55771
Floodmap#08026606450 dated 9/28/82 Floodplain Zone A
Dimension: Road[asphalt]:42LF x 16FT wide x 0.58FT deep/27=14CY x 1.97=28T
Shoulder: (1 FT wide x 0.17FT deep)x 2 sides x 726FT long/27=9.1 CY x 1.82=16T
Damage: Road surface[asphalt—281]and shoulder erosion[2 sides—approximately 30%within the GPS limits 2420 x 0,3=726LF]
caused aggregate loss of 16T.
Location#16 Road EM-52-0585-.0 is a paved road that had shoulder damages. This location is split up into 4 areas as shown below.
There was no damage to the pavement.
Location#16.1 Road EM-52-U585-.0[Paved]
Begin GPS:40.35999,-104.6959 End GPS:40.36147,-104.68857
Floodmap#08026606380 dated 9/28/82 Floodplain Zone A7
Dimension: Shoulder: (2FT wide x 0.33FT deep)x 2 sides x 1221 FT long/27=6OCY x 1.82=109T
Damage: Shoulder erosion(2 sides—approximately 60%within the GPS limits 2035LF x 0.6=1221LF]caused aggregate loss of 109T.
No damage to pavement.
Location#16.2 Road EM-52-US85-.0[Paved]
GPS:40.36309,-104.65900[southwest corner CR43 intersection]
Floodmap#08026606390 dated 9/28/82[not in floodplain]
Dimension: Shoulder: (2FT wide x 0.33FT deep)x 1 side x 40FT long/27=ICY x 1.82=1.82T
Damage: Shoulder erosion[1 side—40LF]caused aggregate loss of 1.82T. No damage to pavement.
Location#16,3 Road EM-52-US85-.0[Paved]
GPS:40.36303,-104.67770[southwest corner CR41 Intersection]
Floodmap#08026606380 dated 9/28/82 Floodplain Zone A7
Dimension: Shoulder: (2FT wide x 0.33FT deep)x 1 side x 4OFT long/27=ICY x 1.82=1.82T
Damage: Shoulder erosion[1 side—40LF]caused aggregate loss of 1.82T. No damage to pavement.
Location#16.4.Road EM-52-US85-.0[Paved]
GPS:40.36303,-104.67770[extending 100LF west on north side of road at CR41 intersection]
Floodmap#0602660638C dated 9/28/82 Floodplain Zone A7
Dimension: Shoulder: (2FT wide x 0.33FT deep)x 1 side x 100FT long/27=2.4CY x 1.82=4.5T
Damage: Shoulder erosion[1 side—100LF]caused aggregate loss of 4.5T. No damage to pavement.
Location#17 Road EM-Brantner-35th [Paved]
Note: Within the GPS limits shown below,there are seven[7]areas of damage indicated as 17.1-17.7.
Begin GPS:40.36650,-104.70034 End GPS:40.36526,-104.70184[Note:This end point coincides with the beginning of City of Evans
work covered under a separate PW Ref#EVANS09 EMMIE#00302,therefore there is no apparent overlap of work being claimed.]
Floodmap#0801820001B dated 4/2/79 Floodplain Zone A7 and Zone B
Floodmap#08026606380 dated 9/28/82 Floodplain Zone A7 and Zone B
Location#17.1 Embankment southeast side of roadway
Dimension: Embankment:(OFT wide x 5.5FT deep/2)x 1 side x 595FT long/27=485CY x 1.82=884T
Damage: Embankment erosion[1 side]caused aggregate loss of 884T
Location#17.2 Asphalt pavement washout southeast side of roadway[measured as 2 triangles In plan view with common base length of
8LF]
Dimension: 15FT long x 8FT wide/2 x 5.5FT deep/27=12CY x 1.82=22T
21 FT long x 8FT wide/2 x 5.5FT deep/27=17CY x 1.82=31T
Damage: Paved roadway erosion caused aggregate[53 x 0.94=50T]and asphalt[53 x 0.06=31]loss of approximately 53T. The
tonnage split was calculated as follows:
0.33FT asphalt depth/5.5FT total depth=0.06
These tonnages are approximate due to rounding errors and a slight difference in density,however they are reasonable for estimating
purposes.
Location#17.3 Pavement washout full width of roadway[rectangular in plan view]
Dimension: 17FT long x 21 FT wide x 5.5FT deep/27=73CY x 1.82=132T
Damage: Paved roadway erosion caused aggregate[132 x 0.94=1241]and asphalt[132 x 0.06=81]loss of approximately 1321
Location#17.4 Pavement washout east half of roadway[rectangular in plan view]
Dimension: 47FT long x 11 FT wide x 5.5FT deep/27=105CY x 1.82=192T
Damage: Paved roadway erosion caused aggregate[192 x 0.94=180T]and asphalt[192 x 0.06=12T]loss of approximately 192T
Location#17.5 Pavement washout full width of roadway[rectangular in plan view]
Dimension: 130FT long x 21 FT wide x 5.5FT deep/27=556CY x 1.82=1014T
Damage: Paved roadway erosion caused aggregate[1014 x 0.94=9537]and asphalt[1014 x 0.06=611]loss of approximately 1014T
Location#17.6 Pavement washout portion of east half of roadway[rectangular in plan view]
Dimension: 47FT long x 7FT wide x 5.5FT deep/27=67CY x 1.82=122T
Damage: Paved roadway erosion caused aggregate[122 x 0.94=1157]and asphalt[122 x 0.06=7T]loss of approximately 122T
Location#17.7 Pavement washout full width of roadway[rectangular in plan view]
Dimension: 92FT long x 21FT wide x 5.5FT deep/27=394CY x 1.82=717T
Damage: Paved roadway erosion caused aggregate[717 x 0.94=6741]and asphalt[717 x 0.06=437]loss of approximately 717T
Location#17 Material Summary: Calculated loss=3114T made up of 2980T of aggregate and 134T of asphalt.
Location#18 Road EM-52-35-1.4[49th Street—from Brantner intersection southwest]
Start GPS:40.36478,-104.70493 End GPS:40.36358,-104.70571
Note: This site is listed for information only. The GPS coordinates shown below from the site visit with Weld County personnel are within
the limits of work completed under the City of Evans PW Ref#EVANS09 EMMIE#00302. This work is not covered under this PW since it
was already claimed under the City of Evans PW. This information was confirmed in the field with the FEMA Project Specialist who wrote
the PW for City of Evans.
Location#19 Road EM-46-25-0 [Detour Route between Hwy 60 and CR25]
Start[East]GPS:40.32057,-104.81143 End[West]GPS:40.31919,-104.82419
Floodmap#0802660750C dated 9/28/82 Floodplain Zone A
Dimension: Road:3700LF x 24FT wide x 0.09FT deep/27=296CY x 1.82=540T
Embankment: (5FT wide x 3FT deep/2)x 1 side x 185FT long/27=51CY x 1.82=94T
Damage: Road surface and embankment erosion[1 side]caused aggregate loss of 634T.
Location#20 Road EM-46-23-.9 [Detour Route between CR23 and CR25]
Start GPS:40.31915,-104.82977 End GPS:40.31919,-104.83334[23-25]
Floodmap#0802660750C dated 9/28/82[not in floodplain]
Dimension: Road:1000LF x 24FT wide x 0.11 FT deep/27=98CY x 1.82=178T
Damage: Road surface erosion caused aggregate loss of 178T.
Location#21 Road EM-129.5-127-.2 [Actual Description:EM-129-127.7-.2 on Rd 94]
GPS: 40.67001,-103.83154
Floodmap#0802660425C[Panel not printed]
Dimension: Road:75LF x 4FT wide x 3FT deep/27=33CY x 1.82=61T
Embankment: (5FT wide x 2FT deep/2)x 1 side x 150FT long/27=28CY x 1.82=51T
Damage: Road surface and embankment erosion[1 side]caused aggregate loss of 112T.
SCOPE OF WORK:
Current Version:
WORK COMPLETED: The Applicant used Force Account Labor,Equipment,and Material along with some contracted hauling to complete
the repairs to the Locations shown on this PW. The work on this PW is itemized by location showing the road and its location relative to the
nearest Intersection along with GPS coordinates. Photos were taken and are attached. The roads and culverts were maintained in above
average condition with well-developed and maintained ditches. The quantities are estimated from site visits and costs are estimated using
the COOT pricing for similar work complete and in-place. These costs should account for the labor and equipment required to complete the
work. The following Locations are shown as Work Completed except as noted where work is required in the spring such as paving.
Location#1 Road EM-110-27-.5
Scope: Replace eroded road surface and embankment aggregate[81T]. Discussions with the foreman indicated that the operator was able
to pull up material that had washed from the roadway to the right-of-way to use in rebuilding the damaged area,therefore only 81T was
placed and the remainder was reclaimed.
Cost: 81T x$33.70/T=$2,729.70
Location#2 Road EM-27-110-.8
Scope: Replace eroded road surface and embankment aggregate[270T]
Cost: 270T x$33.70/7=$9,099.00
Location#3 Road EM-108-27-.5
Scope: Replace eroded road surface and embankment aggregate[811]. Discussions with the foreman indicated that the operator was able
to pull up material that had washed from the roadway to the right-of-way to use in rebuilding the damaged area,therefore only 817 was
placed end the remainder was reclaimed.
Cost: 81T x$33.7011=$2,729.70
Location#4 Road EM-9443-.0
Scope: Replace eroded road surface and embankment aggregate[541]
Cost: 54T x$33.701T=$1,819.80
Location#5 Road EM-90-15-.1
Scope: Replace eroded road surface and embankment aggregate
[[995 11
Cost: 9957 x$33.70/7=$33,531.50
Location#6 Road EM-15-90-.5
Scope: Replace eroded road surface and embankment aggregate[754T1
Cost: 754T x$33.70/7=$25,409.80
Location#7 Road EM-61-76-.0(.1)
Scope: Replace eroded road surface and embankment aggregate[187T]
Cost: 187T x$33.70/T=$6,301.90
Location#8 Road EM-71-80-2.1
Scope: Replace eroded road surface and embankment aggregate[2121]
Cost: 212T x$33.70/T=$7,144.40
Location#9 Road EM-74-392-2.1
Scope: Replace eroded embankment aggregate[931]
Cost: 93T x$33.70/7=$3,134.10
Location#10 Road EM-68-69-2.1
Scope: Replace eroded road surface and embankment aggregate[288T]
Aggregate Cost: 288T x$33.70/7=$9,705.60
Magnesium Chloride Cost: 275 gal x$0.55/gal=$151.25
Note: Applicant indicated that the Oil Company working in the area hauled the material,therefore no cost to the Applicant,however the
Applicant utilized FA Labor and Equipment to compact,reclaim,and grade the material. Although the Applicant did not have cost
associated with material,the estimated cost shown above using the CDOT unit price covers the FA Labor and Equipment. The Applicant
reported the cost of magnesium chloride at$0.49/gal,therefore a cost of$0.55/gal was used above to include the distributor truck and
driver. The Applicant placed 11,000 gallons of Magnesium Chloride after the roadway was prepared at a reported application rate of
approximately 5,000 gallons/mile. Therefore,the application rate is approximately 1 gal/LF of roadway.
Location#11 Road EM-72-31-.4
Scope: Replace eroded road surface and embankment aggregate[9611
Cost: 96T x$33.70/T=$3,235.20
Location#12 Road EM-51-58-.5
Scope: Replace eroded road surface and embankment aggregate[217T]
Cost 217T x$33.70/T=$7,312.90
Note: Applicant indicated that gravel was placed from damaged area to the house at that end of the road,however this gravel was not
storm damage related.
Location#13 Road EM-45-54.5-.2
Note: According to the Weld County consultant[Base Tactical]EM-45-54.5-.2 covers cleaning of the ditch just south of Hwy 34 on CR 45.
This work is incidental to the culvert repair where this ditch goes under CR45. Therefore,this work is not covered under this PW but is
covered under the Weld County Culverts PW#WELCO35.
Cost: $0.00
Location#14 Road Em-43-54-.2[Road repaired by Oil Company]Scope: County supervision of material placement by Oil Company and grading by County labor and equipment.
Cost: Labor: [1 hr x$39.56/hr]+[7hr x$59.06/hr]=$453.00
Equipment: [1 hr x$70/hr cost code 8332]+[7hr x$14/hr cost code 8801]=$166.00
Total Cost=453+168=$621
Location#15 Road EM-388-53-.25[Paved]
Scope: Replace damaged asphalt[281]and eroded shoulder aggregate(16TJ
Aggregate Cost: 16T x$33.70/7=$539.20
Repair Asphalt Pavement[use 7"thick]
Sawcut Pavement: 16LF+42LF+16=74LF x$3/LF=$222
Unclassified Excavation[use CDOT code 203-00010$14.18/CY complete in place]:
42LF x 16LF x 0.58FT deep=390CF/27=14.44CY x$14.18/CY=$204.76
Install Asphalt Pavement[use CDOT code 403-33741$81.70/1J:
14.44CY x 1.97T/CY=28.5T use 29T x$81.70/1"=$2,369.30
Traffic Control Estimate and small Job adder: $1000
Mobilization/Demob Estimate:$1,500
Total Cost: 540+222+205+2370+.$1000+$1,500=$5,837
Location#16.1 Road EM-52-US85-.0[Paved]
Scope: Replace eroded shoulder aggregate[1091]
Cost: 109T x$33.70/T=$3,673.30
Location#16.2 Road EM-52-US85-.0[Paved]
Scope: Replace eroded shoulder aggregate[1.82T]
Cost: 1.82T x$33.70/T=$60.66
Location#16.3 Road EM-52-US85-.0[Paved]
Scope: Replace eroded shoulder aggregate[1.82T]
Cost: 1.82T x$33.70/T=$60.66
Location#16.4 Road EM-52-US85-.0[Paved]
Scope: Replace eroded shoulder aggregate[4.51]
Cost: 4.5T x$33.70/T=$151.65
Total Cost Location#16=3673.30+60,66+60.66+151.65=$3,946.27
Location#17 Road EM-Brantner-35th [Paved]
Note: The work completed at the time of inspection included removal of damaged roadway and embankment materials and filling of those
damaged areas up to the grade of the existing asphalt pavement. The work to be completed includes sawcutting the asphalt and removing
material down to the depth of the adjoining asphalt section[measured in the Evans PW at 4"thick]along with installation of new asphalt.
Location#17.1 Embankment southeast side of roadway
Scope: Replace eroded embankment aggregate[8841]
Aggregate Cost: 884T x$33.70/T=$29,790.80
Location#17.2 Pavement washout southeast side of roadway[triangular in plan view]
Scope: Replace eroded aggregate base[53T]
Aggregate Cost: 53T x$33.70/T=$1,786.10
Work Completed Total=$1,786.10
Work to be Completed:
Scope: Replace Asphalt Pavement[use 4"thick same as used in Evans PW on Brantner which was measured]
Sawcut Pavement: 9LF+16LF+22LF+9LF=56LF x$3/LF=$168
Unclassified Excavation[use CDOT code 203-00010$14.18/CY complete in place]:
38LF x 9LF x 0.33FT deep=112.86CF/27=4.18CY x$14.18/CY=$59.27
Install Asphalt Pavement[use CDOT code 403-33741 $81.7017]:
4.18CY x 1.97T/CY=8.23T use 9T x$81.70/7=$735.30
Work to be Completed Total=$962.57
Location#17.3 Pavement washout full width of roadway[rectangular in plan view]
Scope: Replace eroded aggregate base[132T]
Aggregate Cost: 132T x$33.70/1-=$4,448.40
Work Completed Total=$4,448.40
Work to be Completed:
Scope: Replace Asphalt Pavement[use 4"thick]
Sawcut Pavement: 21LF+21LF=42LF x$3/LF=$126
Unclassified Excavation[use CDOT code 203-00010$14.18/CY complete in place]:
17LF x 21 LE x 0.33FT deep=117.81CF/27=4.36CYx$14.18/CY=$61.82
Install Asphalt Pavement[use CDOT code 403-33741$81.70/T]:
4.36CY x 1.977/CY=8.6T use 9T x$81.70/7=$735.30
Work to be Completed Total=$923.12
Location#17.4 Pavement washout east half of roadway[rectangular in plan view]
Scope: Replace eroded aggregate base[1921]
Aggregate Cost: 192T x$33.70/T=$6,470.40
Work Completed Total=$6,470.40
Work to be Completed:
Scope: Replace Asphalt Pavement[use 4"thick]
Sawcut Pavement: 12LF+48LF+12LF=72LF x$3/LF=$216
Unclassified Excavation[use COOT code 203-00010$14.18/CY complete in place]:
48LF x 12LF x 0.33FT deep=190.08CF/27=7.04CY x$14.18/CY=$99.83
Install Asphalt Pavement[use CDOT code 403-33741 $81.70/1]:
7.04CY x 1.97T/CY=13.87T use 14T x$81.70/T=$1,143.80
Work to be Completed Total=$1,459.63
Location#17.5 Pavement washout full width of roadway[rectangular in plan view]
Scope: Replace eroded aggregate base[10141]
Aggregate Cost: 1014T x$33.70/7=$34,171.80
Work Completed Total=$34,171.80
Work to be Completed:
Scope: Replace Asphalt Pavement[use 4"thick]
Sawcut Pavement: 21 LF+21LF=42LF x$3/LF=$126
Unclassified Excavation[use CDOT code 203-00010$14.18/CY complete in place]:
132LF x 21LF x 0.33FT deep=914.76CF/27=33.88CY x$14.18/CY=$480.42
Install Asphalt Pavement[use CDOT code 403-33741 $81.70/7]:
33.88CY x 1.977/CY=66.74T use 67T x$81.70/7=$5,473.90
Work to be Completed Total=$6,080.32
Location#17.6 Pavement washout portion of east half of roadway[rectangular in plan view]
Scope: Replace eroded aggregate base[1221]
Aggregate Cost: 122T x$33.70/r=$4,111.40
Work Completed Total=$4,111.40
Work to be Completed:
Scope: Replace Asphalt Pavement[use 4"thick]
Sawcut Pavement: 8LF+49LF+8LF=65LF x$3/LF=$195
Unclassified Excavation[use CDOT code 203-00010$14.18/CY complete in place]:
49LF x 8LF x 0.33FT deep=129.36CF/27=4.79CY x$14.18/CY=$67.92
Install Asphalt Pavement[use COOT code 403-33741 $81.70/7]:
4.79CY x 1.971/CY=9.44T use 10T x$81.70/7=$817.00
Work to be Completed=$1,079.92
Location#17.7 Pavement washout full width of roadway[rectangular In plan view]
Scope: Replace eroded aggregate base[7177]
Aggregate Cost: 717T x$33.70/7=$24,162.90
Work Completed Total=$24,162.90
Work to be Completed:
Scope: Replace Asphalt Pavement[use 4"thick]
Sawcut Pavement: 21LF+21 LF=42LF x$3/LF=$126
Unclassified Excavation[use CDOT code 203-00010$14.18/CY complete in place]:
94LF x 21 LF x 0.33FF deep=651.42CF/27=24.13CY x$14.18/CY=$342.16
Install Asphalt Pavement[use CDOT code 403-33741$81.70/7]:
24.13CY x 1.97T/CY=47.54T use 48T x$81.70/7=$3,921.60
Work to be Completed Total=$4,389.76
Total Cost Location 17[Paved]
Work Completed:
Aggregate replacement=29,790.80+ 1,786.10+4,448.40+6,470.40+34,171.80+4,111.40+24,162.90=$104,941.80
Work Completed Total=$104,941.80
Work to be Completed:
Pavement replacement:
Sawcut=168+126+216+126+195+126=$957
Unclassified Excavation=59.27+61.82+99.83+480.42+67.92+342.16=$1,111.42
Install Asphalt=735.30+735.30+1143.60+5473.90+817+3921,60=$12,826.90
Work to be Completed Total=957+1111.42+12826.90=$14,895.32
Location#18 Road EM-52-35-1.4[49th Street—from Brantner intersection southwest]
Scope: Work at this location is covered under a separate PW. See PW Ref#EVANS09 EMMIE#00302.
Cost: $0.00
Location#19 Road EM-46-25-0 [Detour Route between Hwy 60 and CR25]
Scope: Replace eroded road surface and embankment aggregate(6341]. Apply magnesium chloride[5000 gal]since it was used as a
detour route[incidental to the permanent work]. Based on discussions with the road foreman,there were 6 loads of aggregate at the
intersection of Hwy 60 and CR25 on the southern embankment and 17 loads of aggregate on the roadway from Hwy 60 west toward CR25
approximately 3700 feet. This section was sprayed with magnesium chloride twice since it was a detour route. The Applicant indicated an
application rate of 5,000 gallons/mile each time,approximately 10,000 gallons were placed on the section between Hwy 60 and CR25 which
Is 1 mile.
Aggregate Cost: 634T x$33.70/T=$21,365.80
Magnesium Chloride Cost: 10,000 gal x$0.55/gal=$5,500.00
Work Completed Total Cost: $21,365.80+$5,500=$26,865.80
Location#20 Road EM-46-23-.9 [Detour Route between CR23 and CR25]
Scope: Replace eroded road surface aggregate[178T]. Apply magnesium chloride[2 passes at 5000 gallons each=10000 gal]since this
was used as a detour route[incidental to the permanent work]. Based on discussions with the road foreman,6 loads of aggregate were
placed on the section of roadway between CR23 and CR25. The applicant indicated that the application rate of magnesium chloride is
approximately 5,000 gallons/mile and it was applied twice. Therefore the segment between CR23 and CR25 would have 10,000 gallons
placed since the distance is 1 mile.]
Aggregate Cost: 178T x$33.70/T=$5,998.60
Magnesium Chloride Cost: 10000 gal x$0.55/gal=$5,500.00
Work Completed Total: $5,998.60+$5,500=$11,498.60 Location#21 Road EM-129.5-127-.2 [Actual Description:EM-129-127.7-.2 on Rd 94]
Scope: Replace eroded road surface and embankment aggregate[112T]
Work Completed Cost: 112T x$33.70/T=$3,774.40
WORK COMPLETED SUMMARY:
Aggregate: 7499.14 Tons at a cost of$252,721.02
Magnesium Chloride: 20,275 gallons at a cost of$11,151.25
Asphalt: 29Tons at a cost of$5,837.00
Work Completed Total=$269,709.27
WORK TO BE COMPLETED SUMMARY:
Asphalt: 157Tons at a cost of$14,895.32
Work to be Completed Total=$14,895.32
PROJECT NOTES:
1. Following the September 2013 flooding,applicant used contract services and/or force account resources to re-open roads/bridges and
repair damage as soon as possible. At several damage sites,repairs appear to have returned the facility to Its pre-disaster design,function
and capacity with no known remaining work to be completed. However at other sites due to the onset of winter conditions,applicant was
unable to complete the restoration,thus leaving work to be completed. Finally,at some sites,applicant has expressed concem that
unanticipated work may be still be required as a result of conditions beyond their control,such as possible subsequent settlement resulting
from saturated soil conditions following the flood or where high water levels or erosion/deposition prevented a complete damage
assessment.
2. This PW addresses all validated flood related damages at the specified site(s),including completed work and work to be completed
(which damages were known to the applicant and reported to FEMA by the effective date of this PW). In the event that applicant identifies
subsequent,currently unknown flood related damage at such site(s),applicant is advised to contact the State of Colorado Office of
Emergency Management to report the damage and request an inspection prior to its repair. In the event that the State validates the
damage as a direct result of the September 2013 flooding, t t e g p the State e will request FEMA prepare a version of this PW to address the eligible
cost of repair.
3. Pursuant to 44 CFR 13.42,Grantees and Subgrantees are required to retain records,including source documentation,to support
expenditures/costs incurred against the grant award,for 3 years from the date of submission to FEMA of the final Financial Status Report.
4. The applicant must obtain all required federal,state,and local permits prior to the commencement of work.
5. The subgrantee is requesting direct administrative costs that are directly chargeable to this specific project. Associated eligible work is
related to administration of the PA project only and In accordance with 44 CFR 13.22. These costs are treated consistently and uniformly as
direct costs in all federal awards and other subgrantee activities and are not included in any approved indirect costs.
6. Project was reviewed for 406 Hazard Mitigation and a copy of 406 HMP proposal is attached with this project.
7. The applicant is aware that all projects are subject to an insurance review as stated in 44 C.F.R.Sections 206.252 and 206.253.If
applicable,an insurance determination will be made either as anticipated proceeds or actual proceeds in accordance with the applicant's
insurance policy that may affect the total amount of the project.
8. The applicant is required to adhere to State and Federal Government Procurement rules and regulations and maintain adequate records
to support the basis for all purchasing of goods and materials and contracting services for projects approved under the Public Assistance
program,as stated in 44 CFR 13.36.The applicant has advised they have followed their normal procurement procedures.
9. Applicant has completed a substantial percentage of the work but will not have cost data available within the fourteen day Pocket Guide
rule.Per Field Operations Pocket Guide,Section 7,Cost Estimates,Page 26,"If the applicant has not produced cost data within two weeks
of the site inspection,the Project Specialist will prepare the PW on the basis of an estimate for the work accomplished".Applicant,CO State
representative and FEMA personnel jointly conducted all inspections and agreed to use CDOT costs for In-place costs to derive estimates
on this project worksheet,Applicant understands that all actual support documentation,invoices,FA records,contract and proof of payment
will be required for final reconciliation and or closeout process.Attached is the CDOT average in-place cost for materials.
10. The cost of aggregate In-place was established using COOT average in-place cost for materials dated May 17,2013. COOT Code 304-
06000 for Aggregate Base Course[Class 6]at a unit cost of$16.85/T for greater than 50,0007 was multiplied by a factor of 2 to get the
price used in this PW of$33.70/7. The CDOT unit price was doubled due to a lack of economies of scale for the small jobs and remote
locations that were covered by this PW.
11.The county measures its quantities in terms of tons.Field measured quantities were computed in cubic yards.The Weld County
Engineering and Construction Criteria document specifies materials densities of 1461bs/CF for Hot Mix Asphalt,1351bs/CF for Aggregate
Base Course,and 1201bs/CF for fill material. The project specialist used these densities to compute conversion factors to apply to the cubic
yard computations as shown below:
Hot Mix Asphalt: [1461bs/CF x 27CF/CY]/2000lbs/Ton=1.97 T/CY
Aggregate Base Course: [1351bs/CF x 27CF/CYjl20001bs/Ton=1.82 T/CY
Fill material: [120lbs/CF x 27CF/CY]/2000lbs/Ton=1.62 TICY
For PW#WELCO0B,the aggregate used by the Applicant to complete the repairs was either surface gravel or Class 6,therefore the
Aggregate Base Course conversion of 1.82TICY was used.
Does the Scope of Work change the pre-disaster _
conditions at the site? Yes -.�No Special Considerations Included? Li Yes I .I No
Hazard Mitigation proposal included? I_ Yes ( I No Is there insurance coverage on this facility? I 'Yes NiNo
PROJECT COST
ITEM CODE NARRATIVE QUANTITY/UNIT UNIT PRICE COST
***Version 0***
Work Completed
1 9999 Locations 1-21 1/LS $269,709.27 $269,709.27
Work To Be Completed
2 9999 Location 17 1/LS $ 14,895.32 $ 14,895.32
Direct Subgrantee Admin Cost
3 9901 Direct Administrative Costs
(Subgrantee) 1/LS $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00
4 0909 Hazard Mitigation Proposal _ 1/LS $ 0.00 $ 0.00
TOTAL COST $285,604.59
PREPARED BY Paul Hesse TITLE TAC Project Specialist SIGNATURE J.
APPLICANT REP.Roy Ruction' TITLE Director-OEM SIGNATURE G 4
Hello