The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20143892.tiff PUBLIC WORKS Revenue Changes $70,000,000 0 in el 0 0 a $60,000,000 e ❑ 2014 $50,000,000 • 2015 $40,000,000 0 O 0 05 $30,000,000 o -, 0 p 7 0 IC) o O N ;j CO CD o U) N u) 1- $20,000,000 S N `� p n 00 00 v �i p O 00 0 0 0 - 69 69 0 O M V °- $10,000,000 II 0 ° 0 — r c 0 0 0 5 Oin Ln p f N 06 up SO s i H ��kee +ee Qe��5 woe ��-0+ +ems ��0 ot �a�0 t @ @ e Je e�- e5\ a� �o ire et e� r��\ Q`oQ \• °e� � >� �e�e lea ,c." 2015 Revenue Total $132,948,000 (2014 $74,828,235) Other Taxes $7,400,000 Severance Tax6% $4,000,000 3% Federal/State $16,288,000 12% Fund Balance $59,635,000 45% \ ,..., - __ Miscellaneous $18,925,000 14% Licenses/Pe 'mits Highway Users Fee $500,000 $9,700,000 0% Property Taxes 7% $16,500,000 13% 271 PUBLIC WORKS 2015 EXPENDITURES Total $84,449 , 304 (2014 $55, 581 ,423) Municipalities Motorgrader $2,274,091 2% Bridge Construction $7,485,849 9% Pavement $5,694,688 7% Mangement $7,174,323 8% Maintenance Support $1 ,701 ,730 2% / - Trucking $4,935,968 6% N 7Mining $2,399,158 3% Public Works Adminstration $52,117,110 62% $666,387 1 % E O 2O1 $50,000,000 - ❑2015 $40,000,000 -- rn r-- to N M Co $30,000,000 N Efl $20,000,000 co O O) M COLID �t it co o t` CO 'd' co CO r O N CO Cfo CO r O 0~0 O co 't M (h t� Cf) r r $10,000,000 sin c N- to lo s rn N rn 00 0) ._ 0) N U, co M C� co —� N CO r N r r CV N t,f) CO EF? a Efl Eft Eft t- CO Eft Public Works Pavement Municipalities Bridge Motorgrader Maintenance Trucking Mining Adminstration Mangement Construction Support 272 SEVEN YEAR TREND Public Works $90 - $80 $70$60 $50 co z O $40 - $30 -- $20 - $10 $0 29,213,402 27,550,340 27, 110,957 32,570,248 41 ,793,329 55,581 ,423 84,449,304 273 PUBLIC WORKS FUND SUMMARY The Public Works Fund records all costs related to Weld County road and bridge construction and maintenance. This fund is also utilized for allocation of monies to cities and towns for use in their road and street activities. The resources for 2015 total $ 132 ,948,000, which includes a fund balance of $59,635, 000, in addition to the revenue shown in the budget. Property tax is set at $ 16,500,000 up $5,000, 000. Specific ownership tax is estimated to be $7,400,000, up $ 100, 000 from 2014, as vehicle sales recover. Total HUTF will be $9,700,000 up $ 150,000 from 2014. Permit revenues are budgeted at $500,000. Motor vehicle registration fees are $340, 000, and grazing fees are $70, 000. Oil and gas revenues are $ 16,000,000. Federal mineral lease revenues are $ 1 ,425,000 due to the creation of the Weld County Federal Mineral Lease District. The federal mineral lease revenue will flow through the new district and then Public Works will apply to the district for the funding of projects. In 2015, the district is funding $ 1 ,425,000 in oil and gas haul route projects. PILT is budgeted at $330, 000 with the Federal Mineral Leasing District funding change. Other revenues from project reimbursements total $ 17,048,000, which are up $7,909,765. Transportation impact fees are budgeted at $1 ,500,000. There are Energy Impact Assistance grants of $6,200,000 for HARP projects of $4, 000, 000 and $2,200, 000 for CR 390. A HES grant for $828,000 for the intersection of CR 44/49 is funded . There are state grants for $1 ,200, 000 for Bridge 68/59A, and $320,000 for Bridge 26/25A. There are two FHWA flood project grants for Bridge 87/42.5A ($1 ,000,000), and Bridge 53/58A ($6,000 ,000). Severance tax is budgeted at $4,000, 000. In accordance with the policy adopted by the Board of County Commissioners in 2010, the severance tax revenue is budgeted at a five year leveling average due to the fluctuations of the revenue created by the price and production levels of oil and gas commodities. The budgeted appropriations for Public Works in 2015 total $84,449,304 up $28,867,881 . Municipal share back is funded at $2 ,274,091 . Budget reflects no increase in health insurance costs. 2015 salary increases are funds for step increases due employees in 2015 and a 3.0 percent cost of living salary adjustment is included in this budget for a total of $525,530. Other Public Works budget unit is budgeted at $52, 117, 110 based on the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Purchased Services increased $26,250,381 for the following : Contract Payments increased $910,000 based on capital improvement projects for 2015. Strategic Roads decreased $7,849,619 to fund only construction costs for capital improvement projects for a total of $ 11 ,545,381 , which include CR 49/CR44 intersection ($4,545, 381 ), flood project bridge CR 87/42 .5A ($ 1 ,000,000) and flood project bridge 53/58A ($6,000, 000). The Haul Route Program increased $ 11 , 190, 000 for a total of $ 13,435,000 based on anticipated 2015 projects. Right-of-Way and Utility Purchases increased $21 , 100, 000 for a total of $21 ,250, 000 for right-of- way purchases for CR 47/SH 392 Ramp project ($800,000), CR 74/SH 392 Ramp project ($300,000), CR 49/47 south from US 34-CR 38 ($4,000, 000), CR 49/47 south from CR 38-1-76 ($3,000,000), CR 47/49 north corridor CR 64-SH 392 ($1 ,000, 000). Utilities are budgeted for the CR 49 south corridor ($ 10,000,000) and CR49/47 north corridor ($2 ,000,000). Grants and Donations increased $900,000 for a total of $2 ,400,000 based on two bridge grant projects for Bridges 26/25A ($850,000) and 68/59A ($ 1 ,550,000). Pavement Management is funded at an increased level of $429,777 due to vehicle costs. The Trucking budget is up $315,787 due to vehicle costs and adding six weeks onto the hauling contract ($ 159,264). Mining operations are up $ 108,047 with the addition of two additional positions to handle the 2015 mining workload . Seasonal staffing is up $229, 150 due to cost of living adjustment and staffing levels for the 2015 workload . Motor grader operations are up 274 $472 ,364 primarily due to vehicle costs, and the transfer of the Property Accountability Specialist position from Administration to the Motor Grader Division . Bridge Construction is up $489,849 primarily due to vehicle costs. Other operating budgets for road and bridge maintenance are funded at near the 2014 funding level . With some operational economies to offset some of the inflationary costs the current service level should be able to be maintained with the funding recommended . While the growth in the County's assessed value and economic stimulus of the energy industry in Weld County is positive, the downside is the County will have to add significant resources to the Public Works budget again in 2015 to accommodate heavy hauling traffic, address safety issues, and improve roads impacted by the oil and gas industry's heavy hauling on county roads due to new exploration . A five-year Public Works Capital Improvement Plan will continue to be updated annually and will ensure a fair and reasonable determination of project priorities in accordance with the county's overall transportation needs, especially in dealing with the impact of energy development in the county. A significant long term project will be the capital improvements to the WCR 49/47 Corridor South from SH 34 to 1-76 and North from WCR 60. 5 (SH 263) to SH 392 over the next five years requiring over $25 million per year to fund the road improvements. To accomplish the project, a funding level of $25 million per year for five years is required . Thus, added property tax resources will have to be included in the Public Works Fund in 2015-2019. On May 20, 2014, the Board approved the design/build option for the WCR 47/49 Corridor at a total cost of $ 125 million it would require a cash flow mechanism of advancing funds to the Public Works Fund in 2015-2016 from the Contingency Fund and Capital Expenditure Fund to be repaid in 2017-2018. Savings should be realized by design/build in three years reducing the $125 million estimated costs. The schedule would be as follows with the WCR 47 North portion bid as an optional bid in the same package or an option to add onto the bid at the end of the construction : CIP 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 CR 49 South US 34 to 1-76 (20 miles) Design/ROW Design/ROW Construction Construction Optional Bid CR 47 North CR 60.5 - SH 392 (3. 5 miles) Design/ROW Construction Construction Cash Flow Requirement: 2015 Design portion of contract and 2016 Construction portion of contract for a total of $125 million . Cash Flow Sources: 2015-2016 property tax and other revenues ($50 million ), Public Works fund balance ($35 million ), Contingency Fund advance ($20 million ), and Capital Expenditure advance ($20 million ). Total $ 125 million . Repay advance to Capital Expenditure Fund in 2017 and Contingency Fund in 2018. Cash advance and repayment financial mechanism has zero net impact on the municipal share back amount over the period of 2015-2018. The 2015 Public Works Capital Improvements Plan is available on the county web site at http://www.co.weld .co . us/departments/public_works/index. html . 275 CONCERNING LOCAL ACCOUNTABILITY FOR MONEY USED FOR HIGHWAY PURPOSES In accordance with Section 29-1 -110, C . R.S . , 1973, at a public hearing on the budget, Weld County must discuss the proposed use of its allocation of highway users tax fund monies and the County Public Works Fund and provide an opportunity for any elector to be heard on the expenditure of such monies for the current year and for the fiscal year governed by the proposed budget. The proposed use of the 2015 allocation of highway user tax fund monies and county road and bridge fund are as follows: Maintenance of Condition $ 7,485,849 Maintenance Support 1 ,701 ,730 Trucking 512,421 TOTAL $ 9,700,000 276 CONSTRUCTION BIDDING FOR STATE-FUNDED LOCAL PROJECTS In accordance with Sections 29- 1 -701 through 707, C. R.S. , as amended , cities or counties of 30,000 persons or more are required to bid projects of over $ 150,000. Local governments are required to bid competitively among private contractors for projects using Highway Users Tax Fund money (state funded projects), and are prohibited from dividing projects into two or more projects to evade provisions of the act. "State-funded public project" means any construction , alteration , repair, demolition , or improvement by any agency of local government of any land , structure, facility, road , highway, bridge, or other public improvement suitable for and intended for use in the promotion of the public health , welfare, or safety and any defined maintenance project which is funded in whole, or in part, from the highway users tax fund and which may be reasonably expected to exceed $ 150, 000 in the aggregate for any fiscal year. "Defined maintenance project" means any project that involves a significant reconstruction , alteration , or improvement of any existing road , highway, bridge, structure, facility, or other public improvement, including , but not limited to, repairing or seal coating of roads or highways or major internal or external reconstruction or alteration of existing structures. "Defined maintenance project" does not include routine maintenance activities such as snow removal , minor surface repair of roads or highways, cleaning of ditches, regrading of unsurfaced roads, repainting , replacement of floor coverings, or minor reconstruction or alteration of existing structures. Based upon the above definitions, Weld County's Public Works 2015 budget would be allocated as follows by the above categories: TOTAL HUTF STATE LOCAL/OTHER Bridge Construction $ 5,694,688 $ 0 $ 5,694,688 Maintenance of Condition 7,485,849 7,485,849 0 Maintenance Support 1 ,701 ,730 1 ,701 ,730 0 Trucking 4, 935, 968 512,421 4,423, 547 Mining 2,399, 158 0 2, 399, 158 Administration 666,387 0 666,387 Pavement Management 7, 174,323 0 7, 174,323 Municipalities 2 ,274, 091 0 2 ,274, 091 Public Works: Right-of-Way 8,550,000 0 8, 550, 000 Haul Route Program (HARP) 13,435,000 0 13,435,000 Part-time 1 ,726,729 0 1 ,726,729 Contract 28,405,381 0 28,405,381 TOTAL $84,449,304 $ 9,700,000 $74,749,304 Based upon the above allocation , Weld County is not required to competitively bid any service. However, it is anticipated that Weld County will bid out $3, 100,000 in asphalt purchases and contracts for overlays and reconstruction , and chip and seal of $2, 140,000, for a total of $5,240,000 in bid projects for 2015. A major portion of the $28,405, 381 and HRP projects of $10,635, 000 for contracts may also be contracted , which raises the potential bid project amount to $44,280,381 Maintenance of effort requirement was eliminated by the 1994 State Legislature, effective with the 1995 budget; therefore, it is not demonstrated in this budget document. 277 PUBLIC WORKS SUMMARY OF REVENUES 2015 2014 2015 2015 2015 Fund Org Acct Account Title Budget Request Recommend Final TAXES 2000 90100 4112 CURRENT PROPERTY TAXES 11 ,500,000 16,500,000 16,500,000 16,500,000 2000 90100 4130 SPECIFIC OWNERSHIP TAXES 7,300,000 7,400.000 7,400,000 7,400,000 2000 90100 4140 SEVERANCE TAXES 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 4,000,000 TOTAL TAXES 20,800,000 25,900,000 25,900,000 27,900,000 PERMITS 2000 90100 4221 PERMITS 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 INTERGOVERNMENTAL 2000 90100 4316 GRAZING ACT 70,000 70.000 70,000 70,000 2000 90100 4318 PAYMENT IN LIEU OF TAXES 330,000 330,000 330,000 330,000 2000 90100 4334 HIGHWAY USER 9,550,000 9,700,000 9,700,000 9,700,000 2000 90100 4338 MOTOR VEHICLE REG 330,000 340,000 340,000 340,000 2000 90100 4340 GRANTS 6,298,235 14,948,000 14,948,000 15,548,000 TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL 16,578,235 25,388,000 25,388,000 25,988,000 OTHER 2000 90100 4640 ROYALTIES 5,150.000 16,000,000 16,000,000 16,000.000 2000 90100 4680 OTHER 3,800,000 2,500;000 2,500,000 2,925,000 TOTAL OTHER 8,950,000 18,500,000 18,500,000 18,925,000 TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS 46,828,235 70,288,000 70,288,000 73,313,000 278 PUBLIC WORKS SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2015 2014 2015 2015 2015 Fund Org Expenditure Function Budget Request Recommend Final 2000 30100 ADMINISTRATION 752,692 685,920 685,920 666,387 2000 32100 TRUCKING 4,497,244 4,619,767 4,619,767 4,935,968 2000 32200 MOTORGRADER 6,889,800 7,362, 164 7,362, 164 7,485,849 2000 32300 ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION 5, 187,481 5,677,330 5,677,330 5,694,688 2000 32400 MAINTENANCE SUPPORT 1 ,539,931 1 ,660,451 1 ,660,451 1 ,701 ,730 2000 32500 OTHER PUBLIC WORKS 25,637,579 41 ,227,877 41 ,227,877 52, 117, 110 2000 32600 MINING 2,482, 166 2,374, 119 2,374, 119 2,399, 158 2000 32700 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT 6,686,474 7,090,251 7,090,251 7, 174,323 2000 56200 CITIES AND TOWNS 1 ,908,056 2,737,645 2,737,645 2,274,091 2000 99999 SALARY CONTINGENCY 0 525,530 525,530 0 TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS 55,581 ,423 73,961 ,054 73,961 ,054 84,449,304 279 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Summary - - All Departments - - Fund 2000 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: See individual units. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 11 , 135, 108 $ 11 ,581 ,959 $ 12 ,615,686 $ 12 ,573,226 Supplies 7,385,757 9,382,775 8,844,230 8,844,230 Purchased Services 16,316,886 34, 570,689 52,444,638 62 , 975,348 Fixed Charges 1 ,924,752 46,000 50,000 50,000 Contra Expense 0 0 6,500 6 ,500 Capital 200,000 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 36, 962 , 503 $ 55,581 ,423 $ 73,961 ,054 $ 84,449,304 Revenue/Fund Bal . 27,983,539 44,081 ,423 57,461 ,054 67, 949,304 Net County Cost $ 8,978, 964 $ 11 ,500,000 $ 16,500,000 $ 16,500 ,000 Budgeted Positions 141 141 145 145 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: See individual units. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: See individual units. BOARD ACTION: See individual units. 280 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Administration - - 2000-30100 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Directs the activities of Public Works, as necessary; coordinates complaints; and maintains cost accounting records on projects. RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 550,406 $ 575,289 $ 504, 157 $ 484,624 Supplies 52 ,390 53, 000 56, 500 56,500 Purchased Services 130,643 124,403 125,263 125,263 Fixed Charges (803) 0 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 732 ,636 $ 752 ,692 $ 685,920 $ 666,387 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 732 ,636 $ 752 ,692 $ 685,920 $ 666,387 Budgeted Positions 7 7 6 6 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Personnel Services were reduced a total of $71 , 132 as the position of Property Accountability Specialist was transferred to the Grader (32200) budget. Supplies increased $3, 500 to fund an increase in employees eligible for the department safety program awards, which is paid from Other Operating Supplies. Purchased Services increased a total of $860. Postage was increased $ 1 , 000 based on historical costs; Other Purchased Services increased $60 to reflect the current DISH Network service fees. Phones increased $6,000 based on historic costs and anticipated needs for 2015. Vehicle Expense decreased $7,500 for fuel and repair costs for the Property Accountability Specialist, which is no longer funded from this budget. Repair and Maintenance Other increased $ 1 ,300 to reflect costs for the multi-function copier/scanner. Final budget adjustments include a decrease in salaries of $ 19,533. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . 281 ADMINISTRATION (CONTINUED) 2000-30100 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Perform administrative duties with less than 1 % error 95% 95% 95% Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita .259 .254 .212 Per capita cost (county support) $2.71 $2.73 $2.35 Goal TPW 1 : Provide effective and efficient administrative and managerial support and supervision to the Public Works Department. DESIRED PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES OBJECTIVE/KEY ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) TPW 1 - 1 : Perform duties with less than 1% errors, 95% 95% 95% Accurately 95% of the time monitor and report activities of the department 282 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Trucking - - 2000-32100 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Conducts snow removal operations and provides loading and transportation of materials and equipment to all job sites, gravel roads, aggregate pits, stockpile sites, and capital improvement projects with 33 full time employees, 31 assigned truck tractors and 37 trailers, 4 loaders and 3 dump trucks. This department is responsible for organizing and supervising the County Community Service Work Program and operational supervision and management of the trucking contract. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 2 ,240,384 $ 2 ,281 , 525 $ 2 ,283,010 $ 2,429, 947 Supplies 5 ,687 7, 150 7, 150 7, 150 Purchased Services 2,250,312 2,208,569 2 ,329,607 2,498,871 Fixed Charges 28,695 0 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 4, 525, 078 $ 4,497,244 $ 4,619,767 $ 4,935,968 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 4, 525, 078 $ 4,497,244 $ 4,619,767 $ 4, 935, 968 Budgeted Positions 33 33 33 33 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Personnel Services increased $ 1 ,485 due to anticipated overtime costs. Vehicle Expense increased $ 121 ,038 based on historical repair costs. Final budget adjustments include an increase in salaries of $122, 937. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . BOARD ACTION: Overtime was increased by $24,000, truck hauling contract was extended six weeks ($ 159,264), and rental for a loader $10,000 all based upon the 2015 work plan approved . All other items were approved as recommended . 283 TRUCKING (CONTINUED) 2000-32100 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita 1 .22 1 . 12 1 . 16 Per capita cost (county support) $16.72 $16.34 $17.41 Goal TPW5: Haul all material needed for gravel roads, RAP (recycled asphalt) roads and asphalt road construction and overlay projects. Clear paved roads of snow and ice. DESIRED PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES OBJECTIVE/KEY ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) TPW5-1 : Operate 95% of the time operate within established Yes Yes Yes within budget budget guidelines; emergencies, e.g. limits weather, etc. excepted TPW5-2: 100% of scheduled gravel plan 100% 100% 100% Complete annual accomplished annually gravel plan TPW5-3: Respond 100% of service calls responded to within 24 100% 100% 100% to calls for service hours within 24 hours 284 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Motor Grader - - 2000-32200 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Fleet of 42 motor graders, 9 water tankers, 4 rollers, 2 reclaimers, 29 grader zones, 20 satellite Public Works facilities, and four fugitive dust/roving maintenance teams responsible for the upkeep of gravel roads in Weld County (approximately 2 ,500 miles). RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 3,315,985 $ 3,265,700 $ 3,342,626 $ 3,466,311 Supplies 1 ,093,301 1 ,500,900 1 ,394,400 1 ,394,400 Purchased Services 2,324, 740 2 , 123,200 2 ,625, 138 2 ,625, 138 Fixed Charges - 1 ,551 0 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 6,732 ,475 $ 6,889,800 $ 7,362, 164 $ 7,485,849 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 6,732 ,475 $ 6,889,800 $ 7,362, 164 $ 7,485,849 Budgeted Positions 46 46 47 47 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Personnel Services increased a total of $76,926 to fund the Property Accountability Specialist position , which was transferred from the Administration (30100) budget. Supplies decreased $106,500 based on the following : Uniforms and Clothing increased $500 due to additional seasonal employee clothing/boot reimbursements. Other Operating Supplies decreased $ 107,000 as the dust palliative chemical gallons were reduced for 2015. Purchased Services increased $501 ,938 based on the following : Utilities increased $3,400 for port-o-let service charges; Vehicle Expense increased $487,538, and Repair and Maintenance Other increased $5,000 based on anticipated costs. Machinery and Equipment Rental increased $6,000 to fund one rental motor grader for approximately three months. Final budget adjustments include an increase in salaries of $123,685. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . 285 MOTOR GRADER (CONTINUED) 2000-32200 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita 1 .70 1 .67 1 .66 Per capita cost (county support) $24. 88 $25.03 $25.97 Goal TPW4: To provide for the maintenance of 2,500 miles of gravel roads. DESIRED PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES OBJECTIVE/KEY ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) TPW4-1 : Spread 100% of gravel plan accomplished annually Yes Yes Yes gravel per annual gravel plan TPW4-2: Perform 80% of surface maintenance schedule Yes Yes Yes surface accomplished annually maintenance on gravel roads TPW4-3: Respond 100% of Air Force road maintenance done Yes Yes Yes to keep annually Department of Defense roads open during snow, construction events TPW4-4: Respond 95% of the time contact or resource Yes Yes Yes to service calls commitment will be made. within 5 days to acknowledge concern for the caller 286 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Bridge Construction - - 2000-32300 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This unit consists of 28 full time employees and 14 seasonal positions, with over $5 million of reportable equipment. It is organized as a Bridge section , Construction section , and Drainage section which perform a variety of tasks in those areas. This unit also supports snow and ice control and conducts tree removal on county rights-of-way. RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 2 ,060,310 $ 2,083,427 $ 2, 133, 795 $ 2 , 151 , 153 Supplies 799,268 2,369,034 2, 185, 100 2, 185 , 100 Purchased Services 880, 790 689, 020 1 , 308,435 1 ,308,435 Fixed Charges 146, 121 46,000 50,000 50,000 Capital -1 ,095 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 3,885,394 $ 5, 187,481 $ 5,677,330 $ 5,694,688 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 3,885,394 $ 5, 187,481 $ 5,677, 330 $ 5,694,688 Budgeted Positions 27 28 28 28 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Personnel Services increased $50,368 for overtime based in part on historic costs and anticipated needs for 2015. Supplies decreased $ 183,934 due to the following : Small Items of Equipment increased $ 1 ,000 due to anticipated costs. Road Construction Supplies decreased $255,000 from a reduction in contract rap crushing , Class 6 material and rap supply. Other Operating Supplies increased $ 10,600 from the increased cost for shot rock and concrete. Cost of Goods Sold increased $59,466 due to the increased cost of cattle guards and anticipated projects for 2015. Purchased Services increased a total of $619,415 based on : A decrease of $1 ,640 for port-o-let service charges; an increase in Contract Payments of $ 140,000 to fund work on Bridge 42/29A and other various projects for 2015; Vehicle Expense increased $481 ,055 based on historic repair costs. Fixed Charges increased $4,000 as Machinery and Equipment Rental increased this amount based on anticipated short-term rental needs for 2015. Final budget adjustments include an increase in salaries of $17, 358. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . 287 BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION (CONTINUED) 2000-32300 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita 1 .00 1 .02 0.99 Per capita cost (county support) $14.36 $18.84 $20.09 GoalTPW3: To repair and replace bridges, construct capital improvement projects, assist with snow removal on road system and county parking lots, install and replace culverts and cattle guards and perform tree removal/trimming in county rights of way. DESIRED PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES OBJECTIVE/KEY ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) Complete all 100% of construction projects completed Yes Yes Yes construction by the end of the year with 75% of them projects by the end completed within established timelines of the year or as scheduled Respond to service 100% of the time service calls will be 97% 98% 98% calls within 24 responded to within 24 hours hours of receipt Maintain bridge 100% less than 10% restricted bridges, Yes Yes Yes system with less 100% scheduled critical repair of bridges than 10% restricted within one year of discovery bridges Snow removal 100% of the time accomplish task. If 99% 99% 99% from county task cannot be accomplished due to the parking lots in amount of snow or other conditions, business park and provide information to decision makers. Human Services 288 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Maintenance Support - - 2000-32400 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Performs all traffic control maintenance, management of signs, barricades, construction project signing , and roadway striping county-wide. The unit conducts routine and sustained snow removal operations as needed . RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 620,820 $ 623, 000 $ 629, 800 $ 671 , 079 Supplies 600,401 729, 141 778,280 778,280 Purchased Services 113,626 187, 790 245,871 245,871 Fixed Charges 2,699 0 0 0 Capital 0 0 6,500 6,500 Gross County Cost $ 1 ,367,546 $ 1 ,539,931 $ 1 ,660,451 $ 1 ,701 ,730 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 1 ,367,546 $ 1 ,539,931 $ 1 ,660,451 $ 1 ,701 , 730 Budgeted Positions 9 9 9 9 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Personnel Services increased $6, 800 due to historic overtime costs and anticipated needs for 2015. Supplies increased $49, 139 due to the following : Small Items of Equipment increased $7,700 as two jack hammers will be replaced and for materials for the sign shop plotter. Road Construction Supplies increased $12 ,720 for increased tonnages and cost for sand and ice slicer for snow control for 2015. Cost of Goods Sold increased $28, 719 as the traffic paint quantity was increased due to more chip seal miles for 2015. Purchased Services increased $58,081 based on the following : Utilities increased $ 1 , 396 for port-o-let service fees. Vehicle Expense increased $56,685 due to historic repair costs and anticipated needs. Capital increased $6,500 to fund a replacement sign shop plotter. Final budget adjustments include an increase in salaries of $41 ,279. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . 289 MAINTENANCE SUPPORT (CONTINUED) 2000-32400 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita .333 .327 .317 Per capita cost (county support) $5.05 $5.59 $6.00 Goal TPW6: Assure safe travel for the general public by maintaining clearly marked and signed roads and bridges; assist in plowing of snow from county parking lots and roads; install and maintain snow fence in selected areas of the county. DESIRED PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES OBJECTIVE/KEY ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) TPW6- 1 : Respond 100% of service calls will be responded to 100% 100% 100% to service calls within 24 hours within 24 hours of receipt TPW6-2: Respond 100% of the time 100% 100% 100% and place temporary stop signs TPW6-3: Replace 100% of the time 100% 100% 100% warning advisory and regulatory signs TPW6-4: 100% 100% 100% Schedule road line painting 100% of all new or improved hard surface Centerline 100% of the time Shoulder line 50% annually 290 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Other Public Works - - 2000-32500 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Reserve/Temporary employees for seasonal work. Contract payments for bridge grants and road construction projects are included in this budget unit. RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 858,562 $ 1 ,497,579 $ 1 ,662,496 $ 1 ,726,729 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 7,690, 594 24, 140, 000 39,565, 381 50, 390,381 Fixed Charges 20,502 0 0 0 Capital 201 ,095 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 8,770,753 $ 25,637,579 $ 41 ,227,877 $ 52, 117, 110 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 8,770,753 $ 25,637,579 T $ 41 ,227, 877 $ 52 , 117, 110 Budgeted Positions n/a n/a n/a n/a SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Personnel Services increased a total of $ 164,917. Salaries increased $97,024, which includes a projected 3% COLA increase; Unemployment increased $ 10,972 based on actual 2013 figures; Health Insurance increased $9,061 and includes a zero percent increase; FICA increased $38,789 which is 6.2% of the salary figure; Medicare increased $9, 071 which is 1 .45% of the salary figure. The funding level accommodates 53 seasonal positions. Purchased Services increased $26,250, 381 for the following : Contract Payments increased $910, 000 based on capital improvement projects for 2015. Strategic Roads decreased $7,849,619 to fund only construction costs for capital improvement projects for a total of $ 11 ,545,381 , which include CR 49/CR44 intersection ($4, 545, 381 ), flood project bridge CR 87/42. 5A ($ 1 ,000,000) and flood project bridge 53/58A ($6,000,000). The Haul Route Program increased $11 , 190, 000 for a total of $ 13,435,000 based on anticipated 2015 projects. Right-of- Way and Utility Purchases increased $21 , 100, 000 for a total of $21 ,250, 000 for right-of-way purchases for CR 47/SH 392 Ramp project ($800,000), CR 74/SH 392 Ramp project ($300,000), CR 49/47 south from US 34-CR 38 ($4,000,000), CR 49/47 south from CR 38-1-76 ($3,000,000), CR 47/49 north corridor CR 64-SH 392 ($1 , 000,000). Utilities are budgeted for the CR 49 south corridor ($ 10, 000,000) and CR49/47 north corridor ($2 , 000,000). Grants and Donations increased $900,000 for a total of $2 ,400 ,000 based on two bridge grant projects for Bridges 26/25A ($850,000) and 68/59A ($ 1 ,550,000). FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . Board has approved the above projects as part of the Five Year Capital Improvements Plan . The increase for seasonal staffing is justified due to the workload of the projects. 291 OTHER PUBLIC WORKS (CONTINUED) 2000-32500 BOARD ACTION: Board added an additional seasonal worker for eight months for a total of 54 at a cost of $31 ,368. Overtime was increased $32, 865 based upon usage. Due anticipated price increase the cement line item was increased $ 190,000. Six HRP projects were re-appropriated in 2015($ 10,635, 000). The carry over HRP projects will be funded from carry over fund balance amounts. All other items were approved as recommended . PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Bridge Abutments 12 13 12 Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10 ,000/capita 0 0 0 Per capita cost (county support) $32.41 $93. 13 $ 183.83 292 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Mining - - 2000-32600 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Responsible for mining , crushing , and screening of gravel in county-owned quarries. RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 343,664 $ 343,467 $ 472,877 $ 497,916 Supplies 1 ,687,289 1 ,584,650 1 ,307,900 1 ,307,900 Purchased Services 395,452 554, 049 593, 342 593,342 Fixed Charges 73,880 0 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 2 ,500,285 $ 2 ,482 , 166 $ 2,374, 119 $ 2, 399, 158 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 2 ,500,285 $ 2,482, 166 $ 2 ,374, 119 $ 2 ,399, 158 Budgeted Positions 5 5 7 7 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Personnel Services increased a total of $129,410 for the following : Salaries for two full-time employees added to this division mid-year 2014 for a cost of $ 126,910, and outerwear reimbursement was increased $500 for these two employees. Overtime increased $2 ,000 due to additional employees. Supplies decreased $276,750 based on estimated gravel pit royalties for 2015. Purchased Services increased $39,293 for the following : Utilities increased $1 ,960 for port-o-let service charges. Vehicle Expense increased $37, 333 based on historic repair costs. Final budget adjustments include an increase in salaries of $25,039. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . 293 MINING (CONTINUED) 2000-32600 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita . 185 . 185 .247 Per capita cost (county support) $9.24 $9.02 $8.46 Goal TPW2: To perform mining, crushing, and screening of aggregate materials and recycled asphalt. DESIRED PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES OBJECTIVE/KEY ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) TPW2-1 : 100% of scheduled production Yes Yes Yes Complete scheduled crushing and screening requirements TPW2-2: Follow 100%, provide detailed explanation of any Yes Yes Yes Mining Safety and write-ups or discrepancies Health (MSHA) guidelines and directives 294 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Pavement Management -- 2000-32700 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Performs paved road maintenance involving asphalt patching , potholes, and paving operations. Responsible for pavement testing , concrete curb and gutter, crack fill , seal coat, and gravel shoulder improvements, as well as snow removal operation as needed . RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 1 , 144,977 $ 911 ,972 $ 1 , 061 , 395 $ 1 , 145,467 Supplies 3, 147,421 3 , 138,900 3, 114,900 3, 114,900 I Purchased Services 2,500, 729 2 ,635,602 2 , 913,956 2 ,913,956 Fixed Charges 10,979 0 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 6,804, 106 $ 6,686,474 $ 7,090,251 $ 7, 174,323 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 6,804, 106 $ 6,686,474 $ 7,090,251 $ 7, 174,323 Budgeted Positions 13 13 15 15 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Personnel Services increased a total of $149,423 due to the following : Salaries increased $ 101 , 093 to fund an additional foreman ($62, 122 ) and one additional Service Worker II ($38,471 ) and outerwear reimbursement was increased $500 for these two employees; Overtime increased $720 based on history and anticipated needs for 2015; Health Insurance increased $28,584; FICA increased $6,807; Retirement increased $10,627; Medicare increased $1 ,592. Supplies decreased $24,000 as replacement teeth for the milling machine will now be funded from line item 6384. Purchased Services increased a total of $278,354 for Utilities which was increased $520 for port-o-let service charges and Vehicle Expense increased $277, 834 based on historic repair costs. Final budget adjustments include an increase in salaries of $58, 072. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . Addition of the two positions is justified based upon the workload and projects for 2015. BOARD ACTION: Overtime was increased by $26, 000 based upon the 2015 work plan approved . All other items were approved as recommended , including the two additional positions. 295 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT (CONTINUED) 2000-32700 PERFORMANCE MEASURES Work Outputs ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED FTE's per 10,000/capita .480 .472 .529 Per capita cost (county support) $25. 14 $24.88 $25.31 Goal TPW7: Provide pavement management to include pavement testing, paving, patching, crack sealing, and sweeping. Contract administration of concrete curb and gutter, seal coat, aggregate, and other contracted services as assigned. DESIRED PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES OBJECTIVE/KEY ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) TPW7- 1 : Respond 100% of the time to repair or schedule 100% 100% 100% to calls for service TPW7-2: Perform 100% of schedule met or explained 100% 100% 100% scheduled paving and milling operations TPW7-3: Prepare 100% of the time 100% 100% 100% assigned contract bids and documents TPW7-4: Assure Maintain following standards for paved paved roads are roads: maintained and evaluated in 70% rated good 66%G 68%G 69%G accordance with 25% rated fair 33%F 31 %F 30%F established GASB 5% rated poor 1%P 1 %P 1 %P standards and reporting requirements 296 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Grants-In-Aid to Cities and Towns - - 2000-56200 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: In accordance with Section 43-2-202 , C. R. S . , 1973, 50 percent of the mill levy collected by the County on assessed values within incorporated municipalities to maintain county roads is paid to municipalities. RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 1 ,644,230 1 , 908, 056 2 ,737,645 2,274, 091 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 1 ,644,230 $ 1 , 908,056 $ 2 ,737,645 $ 2 ,274,091 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 1 ,644,230 $ 1 ,908,056 $ 2 ,737,645 $ 2,274 ,091 Budgeted Positions n/a n/a n/a n/a SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Budget is based upon the final assessed value of the municipalities with the 2015 mill levy applied . The increase is due to the increase in the Public Works mill levy from $ 11 ,500,000 to $16, 500,000 for the WCR 47/49 Corridor project. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . 297 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: PUBLIC WORKS FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Non-Departmental Revenue - - 2000-90100 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Revenue generated by Public Works Fund . RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Purchased Services 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Revenue/Fund $ 27,983,539 $ 44,081 ,423 $ 57,461 ,054 $ 67,949,304 Balance Net County Cost $ 8,978,964 $ 11 , 500,000 $ 16,500,000 $ 16,500,000 Budgeted Positions n/a n/a n/a n/a SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The resources for 2015 total $ 132 ,948,000, which includes a fund balance of $59,635, 000, in addition to the revenue shown in the budget. Property tax is set at $ 16, 500, 000 up $5,000,000. Specific ownership tax is estimated to be $7,400,000, up $ 100,000 from 2014, as vehicle sales recover. Total HUTF will be $9, 700,000 up $ 150, 000 from 2014. Permit revenues are budgeted at $500,000. Motor vehicle registration fees are $340,000, and grazing fees are $70,000. Oil and gas revenues are $ 16,000,000. Federal mineral lease revenues are $ 1 ,425,000 due to the creation of the Weld County Federal Mineral Lease District. The federal mineral lease revenue will flow through the new district and then Public Works will apply to the district for the funding of projects. In 2015, the district is funding $ 1 ,425,000 in oil and gas haul route projects. PILT is budgeted at $330, 000 with the Federal Mineral Leasing District funding change. Other revenues from project reimbursements total $ 17,048,000, which are up $7,909,765. Transportation impact fees are budgeted at $ 1 ,500,000. There are Energy Impact Assistance grants of $6,200,000 for HARP projects of $4, 000,000 and $2,200, 000 for CR 390. A HES grant for $828,000 for the intersection of CR 44/49 is funded . There are state grants for $ 1 ,200, 000 for Bridge 68/59A, and $320,000 for Bridge 26/25A. There are two FHWA flood project grants for Bridge 87/42.5A ($ 1 ,000,000), and Bridge 53/58A ($6,000,000). Severance tax is budgeted at $4,000,000. In accordance with the policy adopted by the Board of County Commissioners in 2010, the severance tax revenue is budgeted at a five year leveling average due to the fluctuations of the revenue created by the price and production levels of oil and gas commodities. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . BOARD ACTION: An added fund balance amount of $ 10,635, 000 was carried over for HRP projects. Severance Tax was adjusted up $2 ,000,000 based on 2015 projections. Federal mineral lease revenues were increased $425,000 based upon the 2015 IGA with the Weld County Federal Mineral Lease District. Reimbursements for the FHWA flood bridges are up $600,000 . No other changes. 298 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: PUBLIC WORKS FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Contingency - - 2000-99999 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Funds to cover recommended salary increase amounts. RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 525,530 $ 0 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 0 0 0 0 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 525,530 $ 0 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 525,530 $ 0 Budgeted Positions n/a n/a n/a n/a SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Budget reflects a zero percent increase in health insurance costs. 2015 salary increases are a policy issue for the Board , but there are funds for step increases due employees in 2015 and a 3.0 percent salary cost-of living amount included in this budget. There are no other benefit changes. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Salary adjustment amount is a Board policy issue. BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended , including the 3% cost of living adjustment. Health insurance did not increase for 2015. There are no other benefit changes. 299 _els \ 1861 / itekki c-taLitmep?'> OL I TY 300 SOCIAL SERVICES Revenue Changes 530,000,000 0 0 0 N 0 $25,000,000 ❑ 2014 fiYnj ❑ 2015 520,000,000 $15,000,000 0 0 0 M o w 0 o5 0 M $10,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 55,000,000 � M ry N $0 Property taxes Federal/State Fund Balance 2015 Reve n u e Total $34 , 640 , 837 (2014 $33 , 644 , 170 ) Fund Balance $2 ,300, 000 Property taxes 7% $8,438, 837 Federal/State $23,902 ,000 69% 301 SOCIAL SERVICES 2015 Expenditures Total $31 , 570 , 900 (2014 $30 ,399 , 000) Child Welfare $12,740,000 40% Core Services LEAP $200,000 $1 ,068,000 3% 1 % TANF $3,912,600 12% Administration .iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii `- $8,740,000 28% Miscellaneous $683,900 2% '-411 -- - AND $130,000 1 % Day Care Child Support $984,500 3% Admin $3, 111 ,900 10% $ 16,000,000 Expenditure Changes O S oo M $ 14,000,000 N in 02015 U) •2014 $12 ,000,000 - S $10,000,000 F cc z))- O N N $8,000,000 $6,000,000 - 8 N W S o ti O O $4,000,000 tf) LI .- IN M Ui M dj N � p co S S g S $2,000,000 gi 0. op aW O 00. gb g Sl. s I6 6. a in (h t0 ri W ff9 r - $0 / \Go5 *491 �Q e Ga�� C\c PLO / ti Q , Se' oca \aS�e �' �\�.yc oaf CoQo*. 0°0\\� 302 SEVEN YEAR TREND Social Services $35 - $30 $25 $20 - z O $15 - $10 - - $5 -- - $0 • 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 303 SOCIAL SERVICES FUND SUMMARY Calendar Year 2015 is shaping up to be a year of significant change for the Weld County Department of Human Services. Internally, the department is putting the final touches on the implementation of its up-front document imaging system and evaluating the level of success achieved through various departmental staff reorganizations. Externally, the department will continue to participate in the state-wide Title IV-E (Foster Care and Adoption Assistance Entitlement Grant) Waiver Project, designed to provide permanent connections for children entrusted to the department's care, expanding the scope of the project to include trauma- informed care services. Counties in Colorado will likely take on the responsibility of determining eligibility for all Medicaid applicants, including those previously served through a state-wide vendor, due to their choice to apply on-line for Medical services, only. Additionally, issues arising from implementation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) will continue to drive the need toward more innovation and efficiencies within the Assistance Payments Division of the Department. The passage of HB 14-1317 will produce noticeable changes in the delivery of Child Care services throughout the State. It strips away many of the tools counties previously had to control costs and stay within budget, leaving Waiting Lists as a last resort tool . Weld County has historically avoided the use of such Waiting Lists, because they tend to reward those residents who apply early for assistance, while leaving others who may be at greater need for those services behind , simply because of their relative delay in applying . Finding ways to abide by the requirements of this Act while, at the same time, maintaining a fair and equitable means of delivering services will be one of the department's most significant planning challenges. The total Social Services Fund budget is $31 , 570,900. The programs are funded by property tax of $8,438,837, state and federal funds of $23,902 ,000, and the potential use of fund balance to cover unanticipated cost overruns. The department continues to pursue innovative programs to avoid , or reduce the duration of, clients' need for services. While this may, in some cases, drive greater costs in the current year, it is anticipated that these measures will enable the department to avoid costs in future years. Food Assistance caseloads increased approximately 170% from 2006 through 2011 , reached a plateau during the first few months of 2012, and decreased by approximately 11 % at the end of 2013. On the contrary, Colorado Works Basic Cash Assistance payments have continued to increase by a small percentage each year. CBMS continues to impact the productivity of staff and create delays in the delivery of payments and benefits for Food Assistance, Medicaid , Colorado Works, and State-Only Programs. Many of the inefficiencies creating these delays are being resolved . However, the inefficiencies that remain continue to impact the time required to process cases and the number of cases in pending status. Weld County remains hopeful that modifications currently under development will rectify some of the issues created by the system . In the meantime , the department has identified changes to its internal practices that have enabled it to deliver services in more timely and accurate ways, and will continue to identify practice and policy changes that will further this effort. Weld County will be starting the State Fiscal Year 2014-2015 with a small amount of TANF County Reserve, which will serve to insulate us, to some extent, from the requirement to use county-only funds in covering Child Welfare and Colorado Works over-expenditures. The requirements of Senate Bill 08-177 have increased the percentage of our Colorado Works allocation that is expended on Basic Cash Assistance, leaving fewer funds available for Supportive Services and Diversion Payments. 304 SOCIAL SERVICES FUND ESTIMATED REVENUE 2015 FEDERAL AND STATE COUNTY TOTAL County Administration $ 7,000,000 $ 1 ,740,000 $ 8,740,000 Other Programs 706,000 - 126,800 579,200 Child Support Administration 2 ,300,000 811 ,900 3, 111 ,900 TANF-Colorado Works 2 ,427,517 1 ,485, 083 3,912,600 Aid to the Needy Disabled 0 130,000 130 ,000 Child Care 440,000 544,500 984,500 Old Age Pension 87,000 11 , 000 98, 000 Child Welfare 8,940,000 3,800,000 12 ,740 ,000 Core Services 868,000 200,000 1 ,068,000 LEAP 200, 000 0 200 , 000 General Assistance 0 6,700 6,700 Sub-Total $ 22 ,968,517 $ 8,602 ,383 $ 31 ,570,900 Federal/State Reimbursement $ 22 ,968,517 Claims Collection Incentives 244, 000 TANF Adjustment 532,483 Child Support Incentives 157,000 Usage of Deferred Revenues 0 Sub-Total Revenue $ 23,902 ,000 Potential Use of Fund Balance 0 County Property Tax / Penalties 8,438,837 Total Revenue $ 32340,837 305 SOCIAL SERVICES FUND MANDATED FEDERAL AND STATE PROGRAMS Assistance Payment Programs: Most assistance payment programs are mandated by the federal or state government. Consequently, local government is limited as to what can be done to reduce costs from these programs. Federally State Mandated Mandated Temporary Assistance to Needy Families — Colorado Works X X Aid to the Needy Disabled X Low Income Energy Assistance Program X X Old Age Pension X General Assistance* Optional Optional * State law allows counties the option of having a general assistance program and , if established , to determine the benefit level . Social Service Programs: Social service programs administered by the department are mandated by federal or state law; however, local governments have a higher degree of managerial flexibility with these programs. Federally State Mandated Mandated Child Protection — Casework Services X X Youth Services — Casework Services X X Administration : Costs associated with administration include compensation for direct services through caseworkers, technicians and support staff. In addition , overhead such as rent, utilities, travel , supplies, and equipment are funded through administrative allocations. The State establishes administrative allocations and reimburses at various rates depending on the type of expenditure and program . Expenditures greater than allocation are not guaranteed to be reimbursed . Generally, they are at least partially reimbursed through the use of transferred TANF funds, surplus distribution , or Federal pass-thru revenues. 306 SOCIAL SERVICES SUMMARY OF REVENUES 2015 2014 2015 2015 2015 Fund Org Acct Account Title Budget Request Recommend Final TAXES 2100 42111 4112 CURRENT PROPERTY TAXES 8,438,837 8,438,837 8,438,837 8,438,837 INTERGOVERNMENTAL 2100 42700 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 460,000 0 0 0 2100 42110 4336 REIMBURSEMENTS 4,500.000 7,000,000 7,000,000 7,000,000 2100 42111 4336 REIMBURSEMENTS 924,253 933,483 933,483 933,483 2100 42115 4336 REIMBURSEMENTS 361 ,000 706.000 706,000 706,000 2100 42200 4336 REIMBURSEMENTS 2,150,000 2,300,000 2,300,000 2,300,000 2100 42365 4336 REIMBURSEMENTS 1 ,529,917 2,427,517 2,427,517 2,427,517 2100 42370 4336 REIMBURSEMENTS 0 0 0 0 2100 42375 4336 REIMBURSEMENTS 430,000 440.000 440,000 440,000 2100 42380 4336 REIMBURSEMENTS 111 ,000 87.000 87,000 87,000 2100 42410 4336 REIMBURSEMENTS 9,911 , 163 8,940,000 8,940,000 8,940,000 2100 42415 4336 REIMBURSEMENTS 628,000 868,000 868,000 868,000 2100 42610 4336 REIMBURSEMENTS 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL 21 ,205,333 23,902,000 23,902,000 23,902,000 TOTAL SOCIAL SERVICES 29,644,170 32,340,837 32,340,837 32,340,837 307 SOCIAL SERVICES SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2015 2014 2015 2015 2015 Fund Org Expenditure Function Budget Request Recommend Final 2100 42110 ADMINISTRATION-REGULAR 7,920,000 8,740,000 8,740,000 8,740,000 2100 42115 OTHER PROGRAMS 361 ,000 579,200 579,200 579,200 2100 42200 CHILD SUPPORT ADMINISTRATION 2,915,000 3, 111 ,900 3, 111 ,900 3, 111 ,900 2100 42365 COLORADO WORKS 3,015,000 3,912,600 3,912,600 3,912,600 2100 42370 NEEDY AND DISABLED 165,000 130,000 130,000 130,000 2100 42375 DAY CARE & ADMINISTRATION 969,000 984,500 984,500 984,500 2100 42380 OLD AGE PENSION 121 ,000 98,000 98,000 98,000 2100 42410 CHILD WELFARE & ADMINISTRATION 13,350,000 12,740,000 12,740,000 12,740,000 2100 42415 PLACEMENT ALTERNATIVE CARE 828,000 1 ,068,000 1 ,068,000 1 ,068,000 2100 42610 LEAP ADMINISTRATION & OUTREACH 225,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 2100 42700 GENERAL ASSISTANCE 530,000 6,700 6,700 6,700 TOTAL SOCIAL SERVICES 30,399,000 31 ,570,900 31 ,570,900 31 ,570,900 308 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY /DEPARTMENT NAME: SOCIAL SERVICES BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Summary - - All Departments - - Fund 2100 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: See individual units. RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT NEXT FY NEXT FY FY Personnel Services $ 20,501 ,234 $ 21 , 129,000 $ 22 ,815,400 $ 22,815,400 Supplies 872 ,606 1 ,867,000 403,200 403,200 Purchased Services 7,480,495 7,001 ,000 6,817,700 6 ,817,700 Fixed Charges 2 ,563,759 852 ,000 2 ,205, 300 2 ,205,300 Capital 56 ,022 0 0 0 Contra Expense - 667,857 - 450,000 - 670,700 - 670,700 Gross County Cost $ 30,806,259 $ 30,399,000 $ 31 ,570,900 $ 31 ,570,900 Revenue 22 , 556,347 20,644, 170 23,902,000 23,902,000 Net County Cost $ 8,249,912 $ 9,754,830 $ 7,668,900 $ 7,668,900 Budget Positions 301 .5 306.5 315. 5 315.5 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: See Individual Budget Units. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: See Individual Budget Units. BOARD ACTION: See Individual Budget Units. GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Human Services goals following the Social Services Fund Summary. 309 Goal HHS1: "To continuously strengthen services and support innovation that leads to a culture that empowers people to improve their quality of life." DESIRED PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES STRATEGIES OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) HHS1 - 1 : Increase quality Implement continuous improvement system Develop and/or refine methodology to gather of work to accomplish the following: Analyze statistics in order to establish baselines against which current processes to determine if they are performance will be measured in future years. achieving expected outcomes; develop Certain Divisions of the Department were able to remedies and improvements; deploy follow define their methodology in 2013-2014 and will up tracking system measuring the refine it in 2015. effectiveness of improvements; reduce the duplication of services provided to customers Continuous improvement system designed and requiring wrap around services; train service implemented within DHS. coordinators to provide upfront departmental-wide coordinated services. Initial improvement teams launched addressing four key opportunities for improvement. Goal HHS2: Develop & deploy consistent performance management approaches across the Human Services Department. DESIRED PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES STRATEGIES OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) HHS2-1 : Increase Identify existing performance management Statistically valid retention baseline developed retention of quality staff approaches within Human Services to using several past years to determine trends. include individual department approaches, County approaches, and different - Used to gauge realistic and appropriate performance management philosophies and retention levels within DHS styles within Human Services. HHS2-2: Increase Research Baldrige Category 5 (Workforce By the end of 2014 all employees will have fulfillment of promotion Focus) and implement "best practice" professional development plans incorporated and opportunities concepts to include factors affecting addressed within their formal evaluation system. employee satisfaction and engagement, staff development, supervisory development, employee safety and well-being, morale, motivation and teamwork. 310 DESIRED PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES STRATEGIES OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) HHS2-3: Viable Assess capacity and staffing levels to Upper level DHS organization structure evaluated succession plans created administer system. and assessed. across the Department Develop and deploy follow up tracking system measuring the effectiveness of the Human Services Department Human Capital Management efforts. Define how employees are measured. Fully implement new County performance management system. Implement and perfect performance appraisal system. Train supervisors and staff on how to use the new performance appraisal system. Identifying current practices used for measuring employee performance, best practices and standards are set to reflect Core Values. Develop a uniform approach for performance management and evaluation that contains standards as dictated by job descriptions. Develop employee measurements based job standards and assessments that will be defined and implemented in the County performance management system. HHS2-4: Team culture Develop and deploy continuous training and Increase employee core knowledge of all developed across the board job sharing opportunities (using creative departments across Human Services. within the Department of technological options) that will help improve Human Services organizational knowledge, job performance and core values. 311 Goal HHS3: Establish a systematic structure to effectively communicate inside and outside of the Human Services Department. DESIRED PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES STRATEGIES OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) HHS3-1 : Improved Implement the best methods to communicate An improved Human Services' website that customer and stakeholder with clients, stakeholders and other agencies provides more program-related information access to DHS program to include using the intranet; newsletter, web including qualification details could help information and services page; email or newsletters. customers identify eligibility even before coming into Human Services. Implement the best methods to review policy Increased and measureable use of the PEAK with the County Commissioners; system that enables customers to apply for benefits communicate with County departments; the on-line. best methods to communicate with the rest of the County. Develop a process to share positive information with the community. Greater emphasis will be placed on positive outcomes of the services provided by Human Services and statistics that point to success, the image of the department could be enhanced and could improve relationships that are considered confrontational. HHS3-2: Ensure all DHS Create team backups from each division to Top five internal communication methods for DHS staff are fully engaged in maintain continuity. identified and validated. the communications loop Form staff driven improvement teams. Train staff members on project management and process improvement methodologies that will be used during the process. Conduct research around the following: The 5 most important methods to communicate info in I-1S; Communication methods that are currently working and methods not working; The best way to attain the voice of all staff. Goal HHS4: To prepare for the future by identifying appropriate actions to opportunities and challenges that may impact the Department of Human Services. DESIRED PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES STRATEGIES OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) HHS4-1 : Increased Develop & assess budget. Forecast shell created through identified reports preparedness to handle and data that predict future trends and needs. future contingencies Formulate program projections based on increased demand. Developing Management Reports that will provide fiscal data, useful for decision-making, across all Identify mandatory program commitments programs. Several programs are now being piloted for refinement of format. 312 DESIRED PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES STRATEGIES OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) HHS4-2: Increased Explore ramifications of child welfare 90/10 DHS revenue generating sources compiled. flexibility and agility in to 80/20 switch. meeting future customer Cost Contaimnent / Revenue Maximization demands Conduct scenario planning addressing the strategies were identified, evaluated and, where following: What can be cut first; the feasible, implemented during 2013 and 2014. The consequences; the potential alternative Department has identified four additional funding strategies and the business case in strategies for 2015 that are reflected in the budget supporting individual programs compared to narrative. others. Identify "big ticket" items that must be supported. HHS4-3: Enhanced DHS Form staff driven Continuity of Operations Continuity of Operation Plan will have been emergency preparedness project planning team. implemented and revised as appropriate and all staff will participate in and be aware of the plan. Develop and deploy Continuity of Operations Plan. Goal HHS5: To develop a means to clearly and effectively communicate the value of Human Service programs to any person inside and outside of the organization on a continuous basis DESIRED PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES STRATEGIES OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) HHS5-1 : County Increase awareness of DHS programs and Individual DHS division education and promotion Commissioners and other services. plans developed that includes the Department's stakeholders understand mission, vision and purpose. the tangible value that Enhance image of DHS programs and Weld County Human services. Services provides to the local community Development and implantation of the recommendations of the OI Group for the reorganization of the Service Delivery Entry Points to Human Services. HHS5-2: High level Analyze coordinated services within a Organizational report card shell designed. connections can be targeted group of customers and identify what demonstrated from the everyone is gathering. services that each team provides to any family Expand coordinated service analysis after targeted group analysis and construct ethics guidelines regarding the information used in conjunction with the coordinated service analysis. Determine what funding sources and tracking/reporting are potential bathers and explored possible resolutions. 313 DESIRED PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES STRATEGIES OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) HHS5-3: Effective Build organizational report card: Benchmark DHS stakeholder and customer perception baseline stewardship of the taxpayer Adams county; Incorporated "Return on established. dollar Investment" language into report card based on outcomes that can justify current Department activities. Validate the report card with stakeholders. Publish report card on a routine basis. Goal HHS6: To develop and reinforce "best customer service" standards and commitment within all employees and partners of the Weld County Department of Human Services DESIRED PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES STRATEGIES O BJ ECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) HHS6-1 : Increased Ensure that customer goals are embedded within Individual DHS division customer satisfaction customer satisfaction levels employee performance standards. assessment tools developed. Test the feasibility in monitoring phone calls to test for quality customer service. Develop multiple methods to assess the quality of Overall DHS customer satisfaction index customer service (staff, partners, boards, etc.); designed. identify the meaning of"respect" mean in the eyes of all customers? Determine key requirements for all DHS Initial DHS customer satisfaction baseline customers — as well as their priorities (ease of established. use, quality of contact, quality of service, etc.) Offer ongoing training to all staff to improve basic customer service skills. Offer training for managers on the nuts and bolts of reinforcing customer service standards. Ensure partner accountability to Human Service customer service standards through contract language that can be developed to drive a closer alignment and assisting partners by communicating standards, training, and reinforcement. Develop strategies to quantify intangible aspects of customer service (focus groups). 314 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: SOO A SFRV CFS BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: County Administration - - 2100-42110 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Expenditures for Staff Compensation and Operations, attributable to Food Assistance, Medicaid , Adult Protection , and Common Support programs. The State establishes an allocation that limits the reimbursement for administrative expenditures. RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 5,680,963 $ 7, 100,000 $ 6,500,000 $ 6,500,000 Supplies - 536, 172 150,000 - 521 ,000 - 521 ,000 Purchased Services 1 ,402 ,040 700,000 1 ,430,800 1 ,430,800 Fixed Charges 1 ,351 ,256 0 1 ,405,200 1 ,405,200 Contra Expense - 15,452 - 30,000 - 75,000 - 75,000 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 7,882 ,635 $ 7,920,000 $ 8,740,000 $ 8,740,000 Revenue 5,649,218 4,500,000 7,000,000 7,000,000 Net County Cost $ 2 ,233,417 $ 3,420,000 $ 1 ,740,000 $ 1 ,740,000 Budget Positions 144.0 149.0 156.0 156.0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The migration to a front-end scanning system , along with an automated interview scheduling system is almost complete. Caseloads continue to grow, although at a somewhat slower pace compared to prior years. The Affordable Care Act and the State of Colorado's decision to expand Medicaid coverage have increased demand for eligibility determination services and have complicated the interface between the Medicaid program and the Food Assistance and other benefit programs. The department plans to hire additional temporary staff to receive Eligibility Technician training , a manager to oversee the additional temporary staff, four additional permanent staff to investigate overpayments, one additional staff to actively collect back overpayments and one additional staff to provide administrative support. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . Additional staff appears to be justified based upon the workload requirements. BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . 315 COUNTY ADMINISTRATION (CONTINUED) 2100-42110 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Case Load (Average) 31 ,400 33,000 42,000 Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita 5.322 5.412 5.503 Per capita cost $8.254 $ 12423 $6. 138 GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: 316 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: SOCIAL SERVICES BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Non-Program Revenue - - 2100-42111 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Property Taxes, Claim-Collection Incentives, TANF Adjustment, TANF MOE Reduction , and Miscellaneous Revenue Sources. RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 0 0 0 0 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Contra - 115,959 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ - 115,959 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Revenue 117, 125 924,253 933,483 933,483 Net County Cost $ 6,483, 126 _ $ 8,438,837 $ 8,438,837 $ 8,438,837 Budget Positions - -� - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Property tax is budgeted at $8,438,837 for 2015. The difference is a combination of special revenue from various department programs. The Child Support TANF- Retained Incentive is estimated at $ 157,000. The TANF Adjustment is $532 ,483. Incentives earned as the result of claims collections for Food Assistance, Medicaid , TANF, and State-Only programs are estimated to be $244,000. Counties will not receive the Work Participation bonus funds during 2015. Instead , counties will receive a reduction to the Actual Spending MOE , which will increase the TANF Adjustment. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: 317 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: SOCIAL SERVICES BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Other Programs - - 2100-42115 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This budget unit was established for minor or temporary programs for the Department of Social Services. It includes Employment First, Medical Exams, Food Stamps Refunds, AFDC Retained Collections, and Collaborative Management. RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 333,769 $ 72 ,000 $ 490,400 $ 490,400 Supplies 3,526 6,000 26,200 26,200 Purchased Services 284,259 283,000 62,800 62 ,800 Fixed Charges 24 0 0 0 Contra - 117 0 - 200 - 200 Gross County Cost $ 621 ,461 $ 361 ,000 $ 579,200 $ 579,200 Revenue 670, 187 361 ,000 706,000 706,000 Net County Cost $ - 48,726 $ 0 $ - 126,800 $ - 126,800 Budget Positions 0 - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Accounting for the Employment First program has been shifted from a practice of recording expenditures initially in the Human Services Fund and transferring them to the Social Services Fund , to one of recording directly into the Social Services Fund . This will enable the department to report, and be reimbursed for, expenditures on a much more timely basis. It does necessitate significant changes to the category of costs within these programs. The proposal to pass through 100% of Child Support collections continues to be discussed . It has not yet been formally introduced as a legislative agenda . FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . Concur with accounting change for Employment First program . BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . 318 OTHER PROGRAMS (CONTINUED) 2100-42115 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Case Load 3,900 4,000 4,000 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost (county support) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Human Services goals following the Social Services Fund Summary. 319 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: SOCIAL SERVICES BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Child Support Administration - - 2100-42200 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This program is designed to obtain and enforce child support and medical support for dependent children to offset part of the TANF and foster care costs. In addition , child support and medical support are enforced for non-TANF clients based on court orders. RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 2 ,680, 131 $ 2 ,285,000 $ 2 ,545,000 $ 2 ,545,000 Supplies 236,706 340,000 120,600 120,600 Purchased Services 302 ,035 220,000 400,200 400,200 Fixed Charges 89,067 70,000 46, 100 46, 100 Contra Expense 0 0 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 3, 307, 939 $ 2 ,915, 000 $ 3, 111 ,900 $ 3, 111 ,900 Revenue 2 ,497, 125 2, 150,000 2 ,300,000 2 ,300,000 Net County Cost $ 810, 814 $ 765,000 $ 811 ,900 $ 811 ,900 Budget Positions 30 30 30 30 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated in these programs in 2015. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . 320 CHILD SUPPORT ADMINISTRATION (CONTINUED) 2100-42200 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Case Load 7,603 7,603 7,650 Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita 1 . 1 1 . 1 1 . 1 Per capita cost (county support) $3.049 $2 .779 $2.864 GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Human Services goals following the Social Services Fund Summary. 321 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: SOCIAL SERVICES Temporary Assistance to Needy BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Families and Administration (TANF; - - 2100-42365 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Assistance payment grants for eligible recipients of the TANF program . This budget unit also has administrative funding for TANF staff and operating costs. RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 1 ,018,454 $ 625,000 $ 1 ,700,000 $ 1 ,700,000 Supplies 247, 104 265,000 236,400 236,400 Purchased Services 2 , 129,857 2 , 100,000 1 ,962 ,200 1 ,962 ,200 Fixed Charges 50,604 30,000 29,000 29,000 Contra Expense - 6,781 - 5,000 - 15,000 - 15,000 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 3,439,238 $ 3,015,000 $ 3,912 ,600 $ 3,912 ,600 Revenue 2 , 518,889 1 ,529,917 2 ,427,517 2 ,427,517 Net County Cost $ 920, 349 $ 1 ,485,083 $ 1 ,485,083 $ 1 ,485,083 Budget Positions 0 0 0 0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: SB 08- 177 continues to have lingering effects in driving up Basic Cash Assistance in many counties, including Weld , across the state. Our moderate TANF County Reserve balance will continue to shield us, to some extent, from the fiscal pressures that were created . However, sustained demands on the block grant may, eventually, lead to significant measures in the future. The accounting for activities performed by Case Managers in the Employment Services Division of the department are now recorded directly in the Social Services Fund , which should allow us to report and receive reimbursement for those expenditures on a more timely basis. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . 322 TANF ADMINISTRATION (CONTINUED) 2100-42365 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Case Loads (Average) 720 720 720 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost (county support) $3.401 $5.394 $5.238 GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Human Services goals following the Social Services Fund Summary. 323 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: SOCIAL SERVICES BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Aid to Needy Disabled - - 2100-42370 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Assistance grants for eligible disabled and Medicaid benefits for SSI clients. RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Fixed Charges 172 ,752 170,000 180,000 180,000 Contra Account - 45,903 - 5,000 -50,000 -50,000 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 126, 849 $ 165,000 $ 130,000 $ 130,000 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 126, 849 $ 165,000 $ 130,000 $ 130,000 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated in this program for 2015. Some nominal increases in beneficiary payments were approved in the 2014 Legislative Session . Problems with CBMS have created periods of time when the department has been unable to report Interim Assistance Refunds, which has created some anomalies in the financial reporting of those transactions. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . 324 AID TO NEEDY DISABLED (CONTINUED) 2100-42370 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Case Load 365 365 365 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost (county support) $0 .469 $0.600 $0.459 GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Human Services goals following the Social Services Fund Summary. 325 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: SOCIAL SERVICES BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Child Care - - 2100-42375 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Provision of day care services for children from TANF and "income eligible" households. RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 549, 017 $ 485,000 $ 520,000 $ 520,000 Supplies 42 ,988 65,000 23,000 23,000 Purchased Services 414,593 420,000 440,000 440,000 Contra Expense - 46 - 8, 000 - 3,500 - 3,500 Fixed Charges 14,463 7,000 5,000 5,000 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 1 ,021 , 015 $ 969,000 $ 984,500 $ 984,500 Revenue 490,638 430,000 440,000 440,000 Net County Cost $ 530,377 $ 539,000 $ 544,500 $ 544,500 Budget Positions 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: HB 14-1317 significantly changes the activities eligible under this program . Many of those changes are postponed until the CHATS system can be modified to accommodate those changes. However, a task force has been established to implement as much of the bill as practicable. Weld County is in a relatively good position to absorb the increased costs that will be associated with the legislation , but will continue to monitor our position and make program adjustments, as necessary, to remain within our available funding . FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . 326 CHILD CARE (CONTINUED) 2100-42375 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Case Load 700 750 750 Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita .333 .327 .317 Per capita cost (county support) $ 1 .960 $1 .958 $1 .921 GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Human Services goals following the Social Services Fund Summary. 327 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: SOCIAL SERVICES BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Old Age Pension - - 2100-42380 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This program provides money payments to eligible seniors who meet income, resource and age tests. Program costs are reimbursed approximately 99.5 percent by the state. Administrative costs are reimbursed 100 percent. RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 86,375 $ 62 ,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 Supplies 27, 160 33,000 20,000 20,000 Purchased Services 15,288 23,000 15,000 15,000 Fixed Charges 5, 134 5,000 5,000 5,000 Contra Expense 352 - 2 ,000 -2,000 -2 ,000 Gross County Cost $ 134, 309 $ 121 ,000 $ 98,000 $ 98,000 Revenue 126,274 111 ,000 87,000 87,000 Net County Cost $ 8, 035 $ 10,000 $ 11 ,000 $ 11 ,000 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated in this program for 2015. Some nominal increases in beneficiary payments were approved in the 2014 Legislative Session . FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . 328 OLD AGE PENSION (CONTINUED) 2100-42380 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Case Load 1 , 100 1 , 100 1 , 100 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost (county support) $0 .030 $0.036 $0.039 GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Human Services goals following the Social Services Fund Summary. 329 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: SOCIAL SERVICES BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Child Welfare and Administration - - 2100-42410 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Placement of children in substitute 24-hour care family foster homes, group homes, residential treatment centers, and residential child care facilities. RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 9,800,428 $ 10,000,000 $ 10,300,000 $ 10,300,000 Supplies 839, 197 1 ,000,000 490,000 490,000 Purchased Services 2 ,803,058 2 ,500,000 2 ,300,000 2,300,000 Contra Expenses - 483, 131 - 400, 000 - 525,000 - 525,000 Fixed Charges 345,037 250,000 175,000 175,000 Capital 56,022 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 13,360,611 $ 13,350,000 $ 12 ,740,000 $ 12,740,000 Revenue 9,229, 983 9,911 , 163 8,940,000 8,940,000 Net County Cost $ 4, 130,628 $ 3,438,837 $ 3,800,000 $ 3,800,000 Budget Positions 107.5 118.5 120.5 120.5 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The Child Welfare Division is completing its first year of operations under the IV-E Waiver Demonstration interventions. It is too early to accurately measure the success of the project. However, placement durations and total costs continue to decrease. The department intention is to complete the Waiver Demonstration with sufficient ongoing cost savings to fund the additional staff necessary to continue the interventions. Weld County's allocation of funding continues to grow at a moderate pace, which should assist the department in this endeavor. It is the department's intention to request an additional trainer position and one additional staff. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . Additional staff appears to be justified based upon the workload and training requirements. BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . 330 CHILD WELFARE AND ADMINISTRATION (CONTINUED) 2100-42410 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Average Case Load 1 ,873 1 ,833 1 ,800 Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita 3.973 4.304 4.250 Per capita cost (county support) $ 15.265 $ 12.491 $13.404 GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Human Services goals following the Social Services Fund Summary. 331 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: SOCIAL SERVICES BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Core Services - - 2 ' 00-424 ' 5 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Program designed to avoid placement of children into the foster care program primarily through counseling and parental education . RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 286,412 $ 500,000 $ 700,000 $ 700,000 Supplies 11 ,661 8,000 8,000 8,000 Purchased Services 0 0 0 0 Fixed Charges 500,922 320,000 360,000 360,000 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 798, 995 $ 828,000 $ 1 ,068,000 $ 1 ,068,000 Revenue 1 ,086,713 628, 000 868,000 868,000 Net County Cost $ - 287,718 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 Budget Positions 0 0 0 0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The department has modified its accounting of the TIGHT program , such that expenditures on the program are now recorded in the Social Services Fund . This will enable the department to report and be reimbursed for expenditures on a more timely basis. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . Concur with the accounting change for the TIGHT program . BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . 332 CORE SERVICES (CONTINUED) 2100-42415 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Case Load 210 250 250 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost (county support) $0. 000 $0.726 $705 GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Human Services goals following the Social Services Fund Summary. 333 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: SOCIAL SERVICES Low Income Energy Assistance Program BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: and Administration - - 2100-42610/42620 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Administration of the Low Income Energy Assistance Program . This program is 100 percent federally funded . RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 65,685 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 436 0 0 0 Purchased Services 10,519 225,000 200,000 200,000 Fixed Charges 34,500 0 0 0 Contra Expenses - 820 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 110, 320 $ 225, 000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 Revenue 81 , 396 200, 000 200,000 200,000 Net County Cost $ 28,924 $ 25,000 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions 11 .0 0 0 0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes to this program are anticipated for 2015. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . 334 LEAP ADMINISTRATION (CONTINUED) 2100-42610/42620 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Case Load 4,710 4,500 4,500 Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita .407 -Per capita cost (county support) $0. 107 $0.091 $0 .000 GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Human Services goals following the Social Services Fund Summary. 335 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: SOCIAL SERVICES BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: General Assistance - - 2100-42700 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Temporary and emergency assistance for applicants for Federal/State categorical assistance programs and help for some medical indigents. Totally funded by the County. Expenditures from this program are not covered by TANF , OAP, AND , etc. RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 118,846 530,000 6,700 6,700 Contra Expense 0 0 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 118, 846 $ 530,000 $ 6,700 $ 6,700 Revenue 88,799 460,000 0 0 Net County Cost $ 30, 047 $ 70,000 $ 6,700 $ 6,700 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Most of the Community Services Block Grant (CSBG) expenditures previously accounted for in this budget are now accounted for in the Human Services Fund . This enables us to centralize our reporting for this grant and monitor our ability to cover expenditures with earned revenues on a more timely basis. The expenditures that will continue to be tracked in the Social Services Fund will be those that are not eligible for CSBG reimbursement, such as indigent burials and in-kind services. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . 336 GENERAL ASSISTANCE (CONTINUED) 2100-42700 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Case Load excluding shelter (Average) 100 100 5 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost (county support) $0 .000 $0.254 $0.024 GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Human Services goals following the Social Services Fund Summary. 337 tutrus) N T vz 338 HEALTH FUND Revenue Changes $5,000,000 N VJ $4,500,000 a a ■2014 $4,000,000 to 0 O2015 $3,500,000 M M 69 $3,000,000 - 0 0 O $2,500,000 $2,000,000 — a 0 a $1 ,500,000 en o +, CO M Q) O $1 ,000,000 t NrEg N f0coco co Oi InnQcnn nnn �� vop 2015 Revenue . ., �.4 . .O . . (2014 $ 10 , 326 , 022 ) Solid Waste Trfs Chg for Services $582,998 $819,073 5% 7% General Fd Trfs $4,320,296 Federal/State 37% = $3, 143,780 _ 27% 27% - icenses & Fund Balance Permits $2,250,000 $554,600 19% 5% Miscellaneous $27,208 0% 339 HEALTH FUND 2015 Expenditures Total $9 ,477 , 955 (2014 $8 , 926 , 022) Health Communications Community Health $1 ,384,417 Services 16% $4,609,559 / - - - -- - - -------- 49% Administration $180,000 \ 2% � � Envirnmental Health Services Health $2,995,624 Preparedness 32% $278,355 3% $5 , 000 , 000 Expenditure Changes $4 , 500 , 000 7i- $4 000 , 000 co 7r (NI $3 , 500 , 000 cn N °' o N ® 2014 N $3 , 000 , 000 s d-} 02015 $2 , 500 , 000 c0 N- 7 $2 , 000 , 000 CO CO CO r r $ 1 , 500 , 000 a CO Tr In 0 0 $ 1 , 000 , 000 0 0 1 6 ) $500 , 000 a a co co S S $0 rir • Gtz p.c\ \O� Gel ��0 s<c• \Rt Pa God �� \ Qt .sc Go<, 340 SEVEN YEAR TREND Health Subsidy 5 4.5 4 3.5 3 _ z O 2.5 -- J 5 2 - 1 .5 1 0.5 -- 0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 341 PUBLIC HEALTH & ENVIRONMENT FUND SUMMARY The mission of the department, in partnership with the communities it serves, is to preserve, promote and protect the health and environment of the residents of Weld County. The department achieves its mission by focusing activities in 9 of the 10 nationally recognized public health essential services (the 10th essential service — research — is one to which the department has not historically committed resources). The essential services are delivered through five divisions (from largest to smallest): Public Health Services (clinical services including nursing); Environmental Health Services; Health Communication , Education & Planning ; Administrative NIOf„t.r ("), Services (including Vital Records) and Public Health L`4t"'''` Hcalth Emergency Preparedness. u,agnio.e Irnc ti}'atc The department's total 2015 budget is $9,447,955. The department's net county cost target budget for • _ r,, : Inform. to Pro2015 was established at $4,320,296 by the Budget Lilt` "d` j Educate. Cate Director and Board of County Commissioners. The Empower department's 2015 budget request conscientiously forecasts the workload for the coming year and will provide services with the resources allocated to carry Iacselop . out its essential services and core functions in support Policies of Weld goals J County's and objectives. Available Y resources are allocated within the department's five divisions to support the mission of preventing disease, prolonging life and promoting health . The department accomplishes this mission through continuous fiscal diligence and commitment to being efficient financial stewards of taxpayers' trust and resources and in accordance with the Board's directive to deliver efficient government to the residents of Weld County. The Department of Public Health & Environment remains challenged to keep pace with service needs as the county population continues to grow and more families are living in poverty. The complexity of work, shortage of qualified Public Health personnel and intermittent surges in activity (e.g . , disease control and investigation of various communicable diseases endemic to our region , oil and gas expansion , etc. ) create unique staffing issues that stress routine operations. The proposed 2015 budget was prepared to ensure adequate resources will be available to efficiently and effectively deliver essential services to the increasing number of residents and businesses in Weld County. Highlights of changes to the 2015 budget include: = The Division of Environmental Health Services received approval in 2014 for a 2 .0 FTE increase in Environmental Health staff. This additional FTE is included in the proposed 2015 budget. • Total Department staff numbers reflect a very modest increase in FTE of 1 .475 which reflects the addition of two new Environmental Health staff and a minor reduction in staff hours following the loss of a small grant in the Public Health Services division . Although the department is gradually experiencing a rebound , our overall requested FTE of 91 .70 in 2015 is still down by 3.390 FTE approved in the FY2008 budget prior to the recession . 342 • The department's objective in preparing its budget for 2015 was to remain at level funding except for increases related to hiring new staff, cost of living adjustments, step increases and benefit adjustments. Across many divisions there was a marked increase in health insurance costs due to increased participation in the county's health plans, likely as a result of the mandates in the Affordable Care Act. • The Public Health Services division budget reflects increased costs in the supplies and purchased services categories. Specifically, medical and laboratory services and medical supplies costs are projected to rise at a rate of 6.8% in 2015. © Expenditures associated with the public health accreditation process have been budgeted across all divisions for 2015. In the future it is anticipated that the ability to apply for and/or receive federal and state funds will be tied to achieving national accreditation . 343 PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMARY OF REVENUES 2015 2014 2015 2015 2015 Fund Ord Acct Account Title Budget Request Recommend Final LICENSES AND PERMITS 2560 41400 4210 LICENSES 208,000 218,600 218,600 218,600 2560 41400 4221 PERMITS 261 ,225 336,000 336,000 336,000 TOTAL LICENSES AND PERMITS 469,225 554,600 554,600 554,600 INTERGOVERNMENTAL 2530 41300 4321 MEDICAID 17,725 22,236 22,236 22,236 2534 41300 4321 MEDICAID 14,372 19,244 19,244 19,244 2535 41300 4321 MEDICAID 24,017 34,721 34,721 34,721 253211 41300 4321 MEDICAID 75,541 57,265 57,265 57,265 253310 41300 4321 MEDICAID 0 44 44 44 253910 41300 4321 MEDICAID 7,978 6,297 6,297 6,297 254311 41300 4321 MEDICAID 0 66 66 66 255211 41300 4321 MEDICAID 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 2560 41400 4321 MEDICAID 38,000 39.000 39,000 39,000 2500 41100 4340 GRANTS 386,592 388,932 388,932 388,932 2517 41210 4340 GRANTS 340,277 340,221 340,221 340,221 2521 41210 4340 GRANTS 0 15,000 15,000 15,000 2525 41210 4340 GRANTS 0 67,000 67,000 67,000 2539 41210 4340 GRANTS 74,862 49,998 49,998 49,998 250911 41210 4340 GRANTS 86,807 0 0 0 251010 41210 4340 GRANTS 100,432 100,432 100,432 100,432 252710 41210 4340 GRANTS 45,584 39,000 39,000 39,000 2535 41300 4340 GRANTS 100,553 75,851 75,851 75,851 2537 41300 4340 GRANTS 11 ,740 11 ,740 11 ,740 11 ,740 253211 41300 4340 GRANTS 193,008 202.394 202,394 202,394 253310 41300 4340 GRANTS 193,886 191 ,970 191 ,970 191 ,970 253610 41300 4340 GRANTS 100,000 95,500 95,500 95,500 253910 41300 4340 GRANTS 52,065 59,500 59,500 59,500 254311 41300 4340 GRANTS 46,471 0 0 0 254911 41300 4340 GRANTS 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 255211 41300 4340 GRANTS 730,958 752,175 752,175 752,175 2560 41400 4340 GRANTS 21 ,084 65. 114 65, 114 65,114 256410 41400 4340 GRANTS 109,000 112,000 112,000 112,000 2580 41500 4340 GRANTS 0 31 ,933 31 ,933 31 ,933 258110 41500 4340 GRANTS 218,864 191 ,147 191 , 147 191 ,147 2500 41100 4356 COUNTIES 0 4,320,296 4,320,296 4,320,296 TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL 3,164,816 7,464,076 7,464,076 7,464,076 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 2500 41100 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 180,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 2530 41300 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 77,516 71 ,903 71 ,903 71 ,903 2535 41300 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 54,335 64,853 64,853 64,853 2544 41300 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 0 5,000 5,000 5,000 253211 41300 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 68,505 39,324 39,324 39,324 253910 41300 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 5,748 4,630 4,630 4,630 254311 41300 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 5,192 21 ,007 21 ,007 21 ,007 255111 41300 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 64,910 64,910 64,910 64,910 255211 41300 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 0 1 ,560 1 ,560 1 ,560 255810 41300 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 48,105 48.105 48, 105 48,105 2560 41400 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 309,000 317,781 317,781 317,781 TOTAL CHARGE FOR SERVICES 813,311 819,073 819,073 819,073 MISCELLANEOUS 2560 41400 4510 FINES 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 2535 41300 4680 OTHER 1 ,374 0 0 0 2560 41400 4680 OTHER 5,000 0 0 0 2530 41300 4690 DONATIONS 1 ,313 1 ,413 1 ,413 1 ,413 2535 41300 4690 DONATIONS 18 51 51 51 253211 41300 4690 DONATIONS 21 ,933 19,641 19,641 19,641 253310 41300 4690 DONATIONS 0 392 392 392 254311 41300 4690 DONATIONS 533 530 530 530 255211 41300 4690 DONATIONS 1 ,753 181 181 181 TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS 36,924 27,208 27,208 27,208 TRANSFER 2560 41400 712700 TRANSFER 567,283 582,998 582,998 582,998 TOTAL PUBLIC HEALTH FUND 5,051 ,559 9,447,955 9,447,955 9,447,955 344 PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2015 2014 2015 2015 2015 Fund Org Expenditure Function Budget Request Recommend Final 2500 41100 ADMINISTRATION 180,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 250911 41210 GENERAL HEALTH EDUCATION 105,436 0 0 0 251010 41210 GENERAL HEALTH EDUCATION 100,432 100,432 100,432 100,432 2517 41210 GENERAL HEALTH EDUCATION 340,277 340,222 340,222 340,222 2530 41210 GENERAL HEALTH EDUCATION 698,028 714,616 714,616 714,616 2521 41210 GENERAL HEALTH EDUCATION 0 15,000 15,000 15,000 2525 41210 GENERAL HEALTH EDUCATION 0 80,609 80,609 80,609 252710 41210 GENERAL HEALTH EDUCATION 54,303 61 ,212 61 ,212 61 ,212 2529 41210 GENERAL HEALTH EDUCATION 74,862 72,326 72,326 72,326 2530 41300 NURSING 620,665 665,834 665,834 665,834 253211 41300 NURSING 1 , 118,916 1 ,305,930 1 ,305,930 1 ,305,930 253310 41300 NURSING 412,579 341 ,574 341 ,574 341 ,574 2535 41300 NURSING 456,645 547,695 547,695 547,695 253610 41300 NURSING 138,312 119,332 119,332 119,332 2537 41300 NURSING 30,409 37,465 37,465 37,465 253910 41300 NURSING 255,467 253,391 253,391 253,391 254311 41300 NURSING 52, 196 67,508 67,508 67,508 2544 41300 NURSING 0 11 ,968 11 ,968 11 ,968 254911 41300 NURSING 241 ,434 246,780 246,780 246,780 255111 41300 NURSING 86,817 95,299 95,299 95,299 255211 41300 NURSING 807,310 850,510 850,510 850,510 255810 41300 NURSING 64,236 66,273 66,273 66,273 2560 41400 ENVIROMENTAL 2,672,748 2,861 ,651 2,861 ,651 2,861 ,651 256010 41400 ENVIROMENTAL 124,236 133,973 133,973 133,973 2580 41500 PUBLIC HEALTH PREPAREDNESS 51 ,386 48,312 48,312 48,312 258110 41500 PUBLIC HEALTH PREPAREDNESS 239,328 230,043 230,043 230,043 TOTAL PUBLIC HEALTH 8,926,022 9,447,955 9,447,955 9,447,955 345 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH & ENVIRONMENT BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Summary - - All Departments - - Fund 2500 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: See individual units. RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 6,361 ,059 $ 6, 919,443 $ 7,421 ,916 $ 7,421 ,916 Supplies 445,084 477, 112 450,970 450,970 Purchased Services 1 ,250,436 1 , 591 ,772 1 ,659, 904 1 ,659,904 Fixed Charges 725,965 722,641 766,469 766,469 Contra Expense - 701 ,092 -798 ,444 -851 ,304 -851 , 304 Capital 0 13,498 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 8,081 ,452 $ 8,926,022 $ 9,447,955 $ 9,447,955 Revenue 5, 107,797 5,051 ,559 5, 127,659 5, 127,659 Net County Cost $ 2 ,973,655 $ 3,874,463 $ 4,320,296 $ 4,320,296 Budgeted Positions 88.20 90.225 91 .700 91 .700 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: See individual units. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: See individual units. BOARD ACTION: See individual units. PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs See individual budget units Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10 , 000/capita 3. 26 3 .28 3 .23 Per capita cost (county support) $ 10 . 99 $ 14. 07 $ 15 .24 346 HEALTH FUND SUMMARY (CONTINUED) FUND 2500 Goal HS1*: To improve the health of our diverse communities by assuring individuals, families, and communities gain greater control of factors that influence their health. PRELIMINARY DESIRED OUTCOMES* PERFORMANCE ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S)* Increase residents' Annually publicize at least one Pertussis Pertussis Ongoing in 2015 awareness/ knowledge of the high reach public health message Campaign Campaign influencing factors that that increases community Completed March affect their health and the members' awareness of place- 2014 (ongoing in communities' health overall. specific differences in health and 2015) social indicators. Improve access to needed Implement a 3 to 6-month Weld Public Health In progress; Complete by Dec preventive, appropriate, Public Health Campaign that raises Accreditation messages released 2015 affordable, continuous, and overall awareness of health in 2015 timely community health department functions and services. services for residents. Use technologies to improve Public Health Complete by Dec access to services in all divisions. Accreditation and In progress 2015 refinements to clinical services Goal HS2*: To lessen adverse public health impacts of disease through prevention efforts. PRELIMINARY DESIRED OUTCOMES* PERFORMANCE ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S)* _ Reduce risks for chronic Oversee implementation of 5-year CHIP strategic Over 45 partners Progress to be disease and help residents Weld County Community Health plan completed engaged; assessed and results maintain a healthy body Improvement Plan with public additional funding reviewed via Data weight through nutrition, health partners from KP. Joint Dashboard project) physical activity, and collaboration on obesity prevention implementation strategies. Oversee implementation of 5-year CHIP strategic with North Weld County Community Health plan completed Colorado Health Increase years of healthy life Improvement Plan with public Alliance and reduce disparities health partners among all Weld County residents through promoting Increase residents awareness of Radon and food Radon and food Additional social emotional wellness. identified environmental health safety campaigns safety campaigns campaigns under issues (e.g., lead, air quality, radon, ongoing review (e.g. WN V) Keep residents safe and free food safety) of disease from Increase our internal capacity to environmental hazards/ respond to natural and man-made ICS /NIMS Health Care Ongoing trainings forecast, prepare and hazards trainings ongoing Coalition planned respond to threats to basic operational good health. 347 HEALTH FUND SUMMARY (CONTINUED) FUND 2500 Goal HS3*: To enhance our organization's effectiveness by continually monitoring and improving our performance and evaluating our programs. PRELIMINARY DESIRED OUTCOMES* PERFORMANCE ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED OBJECTIVE/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S)* Establish a department-wide Developed QI plan that includes Public Health In progress In progress — quality improvement plan communication and professional Accreditation complete by Dec based on county and development plan that promotes 2015 organizational policies and competencies direction. *NOTE: Goals, outcomes and indicators from 2012- 2016 Department Strategic Plan dated 7/27/2012 348 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Administration Services - - 2500-41100 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Overall administration of the Department of Public Health and Environment, including personnel , procurement, budgeting , fiscal management, data and records management, contract and grant management, and facilities management. The Executive Director is the official registrar of vital statistics for Weld County. Records of deaths that occurred in Weld County are kept and certified copies are available upon request from the Deputy Registrars. Birth records for births that occurred anywhere in the State of Colorado are available electronically and certified copies can be issued upon request from the Deputy Registrars. RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 658,876 $ 682,481 $ 729, 184 $ 729, 184 Supplies 12,707 18, 150 19,950 19, 950 Purchased Services 126,746 192,250 190,450 190,450 Fixed Charges 5,243 0 0 0 Contra Expense - 620,761 -712,881 -759,584 -759, 584 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 182 , 811 $ 180,000 $ 180,000 $ 180, 000 Revenue 182 ,811 180,000 180,000 180,000 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budgeted Positions 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: There is a $46,703 proposed increase in Personnel Services. This increase is the result of the increased cost of health insurance due to increased participation , and an increase in salaries and benefits due to step increases and a possible cost of living adjustment in 2015. There is no change in the number of budgeted positions. A modest increase of $1 ,800 for supplies is projected with a corresponding decrease in purchased services. There will be a net increase of 6.55% , or $46, 703, in contra expenditures that will be reallocated to the divisions of the Health Department. This is due entirely to the increases projected in personnel services. In 2015 the department anticipates birth and death certificate issuance volume to remain relatively flat over 2014 estimates and therefore is not projecting any increase in revenue. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . 349 HEALTH ADMINISTRATION (CONTINUED) 2500-41100 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs 2013 2014 2015 Birth / Death Certificates issued 16,594 17,000 17,000 Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita .296 .291 .282 Per capita cost $2.29 $2.59 $2.68 GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Health goals following Department of Public Health and Environment Budget Review Summary. 350 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Non-Program Revenue - - 2500-41100 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Non-program revenues from the State per capita health funds. RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Gross County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ Revenue 383,382 386,592 388,932 2, 340 Net County Cost $ -383,382 $ -386,592 $ -388,932 $ -2,340 Budgeted Positions n/a n/a n/a n/a SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Non-program revenue from Local Planning and Support, formerly known as State Per Capita , to support essential public health services is projected to increase by $2 ,340, or 0.61 % . FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . 351 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Health Communication Section - - 2520-41210 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Health Communication , Education and Planning (HCEP) includes county and grant funded health communication/prevention programs that promote healthy behaviors to reduce the burden of chronic disease in our county. The Health Communication team coordinates the Community Health Improvement Plan and strategic planning functions for the department. HCEP serves as the liaison with the local TV/radio/newspaper media for the Health Department. They develop and disseminate emergency communication and educational materials to the public. The HCEP team provides support internally for producing educational materials, reports, and local health data . Health Communication partners with the community to implement strategies that promote and support healthy behaviors. These include improving access to healthy foods and recreation for all residents, cardiovascular disease and diabetes prevention and management, men's health screening and lifestyle education , healthy relationships for teens and parents to prevent unintended pregnancy and STI , tobacco use prevention , and traffic safety and prevention of unintentional injuries for teens. Coalitions such as Drive Smart Weld County, the Community Health Improvement Plan (CHIP) coalition , and the Weld Tobacco-Free Coalition , provide guidance to the department to address these important health issues in Weld County. RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 773,975 $ 879,228 $ 955,771 $ 955,771 Supplies 9,285 27,240 8,777 8,777 Purchased Services 262,909 366,014 311 ,095 311 ,095 Fixed Charges 156,304 100,856 108,774 108,774 Contra Expense 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 1 ,202 ,473 $ 1 ,373,338 $ 1 ,384,417 $ 1 ,384,417 Revenue 679,239 647,962 611 ,651 611 ,651 Net County Cost $ 523,234 $ 725,376 $ 772,766 $ 772,766 Budget Positions 11 .25 11 .65 11 .75 11 .75 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The Net County Cost for 2015 is $47,390 higher than in 2014. Additional grant projects brought a slight increase of 0. 10 FTE compared to 2014. Personnel costs are up slightly due to projected cost-of-living adjustments. Supplies and purchased services decreased $73,382 all associated with projected grant program costs in 2015. Fixed costs from administrative overhead is up $7,918. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . 352 HEALTH COMMUNICATION SECTION (CONTINUED) 2520-41210 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs 2013 2014 2015 # residents reached by the classes, programs 166, 000 167,000 168,000 News release exposure 600, 000 600,000 700,000 Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita .406 .423 .414 Per capita cost (county support) $ 1 .93 $2.63 $2 . 16 Effectiveness results Reduction in motor vehicle fatalities. 42 36 36 Reduction in teen birth rate for 15 - 17 yr. olds -- MCH data 20/1 ,000 19/1 ,000 18/1 ,000 Number of obese adults -- BRFSS data 23.0 23.0 25 Adult Smoking rates - - BRFSS data 12. 0% 11 .0% 17. 8% GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Health goals following Department of Public Health and Environment Budget Unit Request Summary. 353 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Public Health Services - - 2530-41300 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: The division holds clinics for immunizations, family planning , international travel health , and Tuberculosis. It also provides immunizations, screening , counseling , communicable disease surveillance, containment, treatment, and teaching . Provides home visits for health promotion , evaluation , health assessment, and community activities. RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 2,799,782 $ 3, 125,804 $ 3,272, 118 $ 3,272, 118 Supplies 278, 102 243, 199 223,816 223, 816 Purchased Services 494, 179 510,075 714,890 714,890 Fixed Charges 346,643 392,410 398,735 398, 735 Contra Expense 0 0 0 0 Capital 0 13,498 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 3,918,706 $ 4,284,986 $ 4,609,559 $ 4,609,559 Revenue 2 ,247,236 2 ,094,549 2,047,503 2,047,503 Net County Cost $ 1 ,671 ,470 $ 2, 190,437 $ 2,562,056 $ 2,562,056 Budgeted Positions 42 .6 44. 125 43 .700 43 .700 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Personnel Services expenses have increased by $ 146,314. This change is primarily due to planned step increases and a possible cost of living increase. Due to grant fund there is 0.425 FTE reduction . Supplies and Purchased Services have increased by a net of $ 185,432 . The increase is primarily due to increased cost of medical supplies and services across several Public Health Services programs. In addition we have budgeted for expenditures related to the public health accreditation process that we will be undertaking in 2015. In Fixed Costs there is a modest increase of $6, 325, or 1 .61 % , in our administration overhead charges. Overall revenue is expected to decrease by $47,046, or approximately 2 .25% . This is primarily due to the loss of grant funding (with corresponding decreases in activities and expenditures) in a few of our Public Health Services programs. This decrease in revenue will be slightly offset by increased revenue projected in other fee for service programs, such as Travel Clinic, MD Clinic, STD , and immunizations and increased grant revenue in our Nurse Home Visitor program . FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . 354 PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICES (CONTINUED) 2500-41300 PERFOMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Immunizations/Communicable Disease 5,753 5,870 5,800 Travel Clinic 513 562 562 Tuberculosis 1 ,021 1 ,270 1 ,270 Healthy Communities 11 ,000 21 ,249 19,000 Mobil Unit — Outings 112 112 112 Family Planning 3,940 2, 148 2, 148 MD Clinic 276 200 250 Nurse Home Visits 1 ,854 1 ,887 1 ,900 MCH - HCP 133 179 179 MCH - Medical Home 17 25 25 Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10, 000/capita 1 . 57 1 .60 1 .54 Per capita cost (county support) 6. 18 7. 96 9.04 GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Health goals following Department of Public Health and Environment Budget Unit Request Summary. 355 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Environmental Health Services - - 2560-41400 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: The primary mission of the division is to protect and perpetuate the public health of the citizens of the county with scientific risk assessments, the development of policies, monitoring and inspections, consultation , and the enforcement of regulations designed to protect food , water, and air supplies. Services include technical assistance and consultation , monitoring and sampling , inspection and enforcement, education and outreach , and planning activities. The laboratory's purpose is to process medical and water samples. RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 1 ,921 ,864 $ 1 ,991 ,684 $ 2,241 , 173 $ 2 ,241 , 173 Supplies 144,640 184,023 192,775 192,775 Purchased Services 358,520 500, 879 416, 955 416,955 Fixed Charges 198,785 205,961 236,441 236,441 Contra Expense -80,331 -85,563 -91 ,720 -91 ,720 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 2 ,543,478 $ 2 ,796,984 $ 2 ,995,624 $ 2,995,624 Revenue 1 ,576,878 1 ,523,592 1 ,676,493 1 ,676,493 Net County Cost $ 966,600 $ 1 ,273,392 $ 1 ,319, 131 $ 1 ,319, 131 Budgeted Positions 23.75 23.75 25.75 25.75 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Personnel Services expenses have increased by $249,489. The increase is due to the planned addition of two additional FTE during budget year 2015, planned step increases, and COLA. 50% of expenses for EH Director's position is budgeted in the Contra Expense account ($91 ,720) due to GSA duties. Supplies have increased by $8,752. This increase is due primarily to increased consumable costs in the Medical Screening Program (an increase of $21 ,557) and an increase to Decade software maintenance contract ($3,600). Supply costs dropped in many programs. The Division's request for Purchased Services decreased by $83 ,924 or 17% . This decrease is due primarily to a reduced cost allocation for Weld Information Technology services ($56,779), the reduction of the Medical Laboratory Director ($12 ,000), and not budgeting for temporary staff ($ 15,000), which are not anticipated to be needed due to the hiring of new staff in 2015. The Fixed Charges request has increased by $30,480 for the EH Division's share of Health Administration costs. Revenue is expected to increase by $ 152,901 . This increase is primarily due to continued growth in the number of licenses issued in the Food Program ($4,000), increased activity in ISDS ($67, 000), water testing ($8,000), and medical testing ($4, 500), a transfer from the Federal Mineral Lease Board for expenses ($47, 114) in the oil and gas water testing program , and an increased transfer of $ 15,715 from the Solid Waste fund for the waste and Household Hazardous Waste (HHW) programs. Net county costs increased by $45,739. 356 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES (CONTINUED) 2560-41400 FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . The two additional positions were approved mid-year due to workload requirements. BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs* Food inspections, activities, complaints 3,036 3,400 3,500 Laboratory analyses 17,783 18,000 18, 100 Household Hazardous Waste Disposed (#'s) 464, 116 507, 000 510,000 Environmental Planning Reviews 344 440 440 I .S. D .S. permits and inspections 1 ,002 1 ,071 1 ,071 Waste inspections, complaints, spill reports 193 200 220 Biosolids Inspections, activities, complaints 227 230 230 Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10 ,000/capita .88 .86 .91 Per capita cost (county support) $3. 57 a $4.62 $4.65 GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Health goals following Department of Public Health and Environment Budget Unit Request Summary. 357 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Public Health Preparedness - - 2580-41500 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Public Health Preparedness utilizes grants and county funding to enhance the ambient level of emergency preparedness, both internally (county organization) and externally (constituents). This unit is charged with preparing for, and responding to, incidents and events which threaten the quality and quantity of life within the purview of health and environment; develops exercises and evaluates various plans, procedures and protocols associated with emergency preparedness; is assigned disease investigation duties and functions, along with regional bioterrorism laboratory duties and functions; houses the county-wide Health Alert Network, communications and warning operations; and is engaged in local , regional , state and national collaborative efforts associated with these disciplines. RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 206,562 $ 240,246 $ 223,670 $ 223,670 Supplies 350 4,500 5,652 5,652 Purchased Services 8,082 22, 554 26,514 26, 514 Fixed Charges 18,990 23,414 22,519 22,519 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 233,984 $ 290,714 $ 278,355 $ 278,355 Revenue 221 ,062 218,864 223, 080 223, 080 Net County Cost $ 12 ,922 $ 71 ,850 $ 55,275 $ 55,275 Budgeted Positions 2.6 2.7 2.5 2.5 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Personnel Services decreased by $ 16,576 from 2014 to 2015. This is primarily due to the reduction in salaries achieved by a change in staffing from a Public Health Preparedness Director to a Public Health Preparedness Coordinator. In addition , the department is no longer budgeting for staff to perform Medical Reserve Corp functions. Overall Net County Cost decreased by $ 16,575 and FTE decreased by 0.20 for 2015. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000 capita . 096 .098 . 090 Per capita cost (county support) $0. 05 $0.26 $0. 19 GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Health goals following Department of Public Health and Environment Budget Unit Request Summary. 358 SEVEN YEAR TREND Human Services $16 $14 — $12 $10 — cn O $$ $6 — $4 $2 $0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 359 HUMAN SERVICES FUND SUMMARY The Human Services Fund is funded at $7,821 ,475 for 2015, which is down $166,593 or 2 .08 percent, from the previous year, even though there are major shifts in funding by program . Community Services Block Grant is up $ 135,077, and Senior Nutrition programs are up $57,646. Department of Labor programs are down $47,910. Area Agency on Aging is up $260,859 or 8.96 percent. Being totally reliant upon state and federal funding sources, Human Services continues to operate in an uncertain environment. The Human Services Fund budget has been constructed based upon the best available information on the funding levels. It is very likely that many of the amounts will be changed between now and the actual execution of the 2015 budget. As fiscal pressures are dealt with , at the Federal and State levels, changes could be forthcoming that will affect this funding . The primary programs of Human Services are associated with the Workforce Investment Act (WIA) funded under the Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration . This program is anticipating $2 ,621 , 040 for 2015. In addition , the Job Service contract will be $1 , 117,835 up $188,835. Funding for this program should remain fairly constant, depending on budget control measures enacted at the Federal level . The Human Services Fund is totally funded through state and federal programs, with the exception of the 25 percent local match for the Area Agency on Aging program , which amounts to $12,351 . Other programs of the Human Services Fund remain relatively stable programmatically with the following 2015 funding levels: Area Agency on Aging $ 3, 172 ,779 Senior Nutrition $ 606,646 CSBG $ 303, 175 In the above programs, Weld County must continue to be responsive and reactive to federal and state administrative and budget changes in 2015. 360 HUMAN SERVICES SUMMARY OF REVENUES 2015 2014 2015 2015 2015 Fund Org Acct Account Title Budget Request Recommend Final INTERGOVERNMENTAL 2653 60000 4314 USDA 68,182 107,179 107, 179 107,179 2654 60000 4314 USDA 12,500 43,500 43,500 43,500 2656 60000 4314 USDA 15,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 2627 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 30,000 30.000 30,000 30,000 2636 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 529,350 852,875 852,875 852,875 2637 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 486,300 690,000 690,000 690,000 2643 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 486,300 500,000 500,000 500,000 2651 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 92,500 80, 149 80, 149 80,149 2652 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 259,855 219,959 219,959 219,959 2653 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 274,467 274,467 274,467 274,467 2654 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 31 ,500 31 ,500 31 ,500 31 ,500 2655 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 11 ,798 27,200 27,200 27,200 2657 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 2,061 2;027 2,027 2,027 2658 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 6,875 6.958 6,958 6,958 2673 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 87,420 88,629 88,629 88,629 262955 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 929,000 939,000 939,000 939,000 263907 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 40,000 0 0 0 265995 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 1 ,784,900 1 ,820.000 1820,000 1 ,820,000 267895 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 168,098 303,175 303,175 303,175 2632 60000 4340 GRANTS 761 , 100 0 0 0 2635 60000 4340 GRANTS 127,000 182,000 182,000 182,000 2646 60000 4340 GRANTS 149,000 149,000 149,000 149,000 2648 60000 4340 GRANTS 190,000 0 0 0 2660 60000 4340 GRANTS 0 4,515 4,515 4,515 2667 60000 4340 GRANTS 12,000 9.659 9,659 9,659 2671 60000 4340 GRANTS 639,511 871 ,332 871 ,332 871 ,332 262995 60000 4340 GRANTS 258,000 0 0 0 2653 60000 711000 TRANSFER 12,351 12,351 12,351 12,351 TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL 7,465,068 7,275,475 7,275,475 7,275,475 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 2645 60000 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 327,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 2646 60000 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 46,000 46.000 46,000 46,000 TOTAL CHARGE DOR SERVICES 373,000 396,000 396,000 396,000 MISCELLANEOUS 2653 60000 4690 DONATIONS 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 7,988,068 7,821 ,475 7,821 ,475 7,821 ,475 361 HUMAN SERVICES SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2015 2014 2015 2015 2015 Fund Org Expenditure Function Budget Request Recommend Final 262695 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 929,000 939,000 939,000 939,000 2627 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 262995 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 258,000 0 0 0 2632 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 761 , 100 0 0 0 2635 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 127,000 182,000 182,000 182,000 2536 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 529,350 852,875 852,875 852,875 2637 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 486,300 690,000 690,000 690,000 2639 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 15,000 0 0 0 263907 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 25,000 0 0 0 2643 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 486,300 500,000 500,000 500,000 2645 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 327,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 2646 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 195,000 195,000 195,000 195,000 2648 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 190,000 0 0 0 2651 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 92,500 92,500 92,500 92,500 2652 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 259,855 219,959 219,959 219,959 2653 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 505,000 531 ,646 531 ,646 531 ,646 2654 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 44,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 2655 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 11 ,798 27,200 27,200 27,200 2657 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 15,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 2658 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 2,061 2,027 2,027 2,027 2658 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 6,875 6,958 6,958 6,958 265995 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 1 ,784,900 1 ,820,000 1 ,820,000 1 ,820,000 2660 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 0 4,515 4,515 4,515 2667 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 12,000 9,659 9,659 9,659 2671 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 639,511 871 ,332 871 ,332 871 ,332 2673 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 87,420 88,629 88,629 88,629 267895 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 168,098 303, 175 303, 175 303, 175 TOTAL HUMAN SERVICES 7,988,068 7,821 ,475 7,821 ,475 7,821 ,475 362 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Summary — All Budget Units in Human Services Fund DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: See Individual Units. RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 5,211 ,353 $ 5, 146,084 $ 5,015,614 $ 5,015,634 Supplies 258, 040 88,500 375,675 375,675 Purchased Services 2 ,559,847 2 ,753,484 2 ,428,566 2 ,428,566 Fixed Charges 550 0 1 ,600 1 ,600 Gross County Cost $ 8,029,790 $ 7,988,068 $ 7,821 ,455 $ 7,821 ,475 Revenue 7,929,954 7,975,717 7,809, 104 7,809, 124 Net County Cost $ 99,836 $ 12 ,351 $ 12 ,351 $ 12 ,351 Budget Positions 83 83 82 82 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: See Individual Budget Units. OBJECTIVES: See Individual Budget Units. BOARD ACTION: See Individual Budget Units. GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Human Services goals following the Social Services Fund Summary for all budget units in this fund . 363 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Wag ner/Peyser - - 60000-2626 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Administer all Job Service activities in Weld County. RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 911 ,845 $ 820,000 $ 880,000 $ 880 ,000 Supplies 9 ,699 3,000 3,000 3 ,000 Purchased Services 196,291 106,000 56,000 56,000 Gross County Cost $ 1 , 117,835 $ 929, 000 $ 939,000 $ 939,000 Revenue 1 , 117, 835 929, 000 939,000 939,000 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions 15 15 16 16 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated in this program for 2015. However, as fiscal pressures are dealt with , at the Federal and State levels, changes could be forthcoming that will affect this funding . FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Clients served 23,000 23,000 20,000 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $4. 131 $3.375 $3.312 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Job placements 43% 45% 48% 364 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Summer Job Hunt - - 60000-2627 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Administer youth employment program for the summer months. RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 40,030 $ 26,500 $ 26,500 $ 26,500 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 9,690 3,500 3,500 3 ,500 Gross County Cost $ 49,720 $ 30 , 000 $ 30,000 $ 30, 000 Revenue 49,720 30, 000 30,000 30,000 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated in this program for 2015 . However, as fiscal pressures are dealt with , at the Federal and State levels, changes could be forthcoming that will affect this funding . FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Clients served 2 ,600 2 ,400 2 ,700 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $0. 184 $0. 109 $0 . 106 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Clients placed in employment 1 , 300 I 1 ,200 I 1 ,350 365 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Employment First - - 60000-262995 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This program allows eligible Food Stamp clients to participate in various job search and development activities to retrain them for better paying jobs. This program was previously reflected as an intra-county, inter-fund transfer between the Human Services Fund and the Social Services Fund . It is now wholly located within the Social Services Fund Budget document. RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 190,304 $ 195,000 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 5,037 3,000 0 0 Purchased Services 95, 109 60 ,000 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 290,450 $ 258, 000 $ 0 $ 0 Revenue 282 ,476 258, 000 0 0 Net County Cost $ 7,974 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions 2 2 0 0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: This program was previously reflected as an intra-county, inter- fund transfer between the Human Services Fund and the Social Services Fund . It is now wholly located within the Social Services Fund Budget document. The two Case Managers previously counted here are now in the Social Services Fund Employment First Budget line. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . Concur with the accounting change for the Employment First program . BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Clients served 3, 900 3,900 N/A Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $ 1 . 073 $0 . 937 $0. 000 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Clients placed in employment 1 ,900 1 , 900 N/A 366 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERV CES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Assistance to Needy Families - - 60000-2632 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Employment/Training program for clients on welfare. This program was previously reflected as an intra-county, inter-fund transfer between the Human Services Fund and the Social Services Fund . It is now wholly located within the Social Services Fund Budget document. RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 414,314 $ 440,300 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 4,612 0 0 0 Purchased Services 267,751 320,800 0 0 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 686,677 $ 761 , 100 $ 0 $ 0 Revenue 679, 104 761 , 100 0 0 Net County Cost $ 7,573 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions 6 6 0 0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: This program was previously reflected as an intra-county, inter- fund transfer between the Human Services Fund and the Social Services Fund . It is now wholly located within the Social Services Fund Budget document. The six Case Managers previously counted here are now in the Social Services Fund TANF Budget line. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . Concur with the accounting change for this program . BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Clients served/month 330 330 N/A Efficiency Measures Per capita cost (county support) $2 .538 $2.765 $0.000 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Meet Federal participation rates Yes Yes Yes 367 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Workforce Investment Act (Admin . ', 60000-2635 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This program tracks the administration for all of the Workforce Investment Act grants. RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 134,925 $ 125,000 $ 180,000 $ 180,000 Supplies 121 0 0 0 Purchased Services 25,650 2 ,000 2 ,000 2 ,000 Gross County Cost $ 160,696 $ 127, 000 $ 182,000 $ 182 , 000 Revenue 160,696 127, 000 182 ,000 182 ,000 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions 3 3 3 3 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated in this program for 2015 . However, as fiscal pressures are dealt with , at the Federal and State levels, changes could be forthcoming that will affect this funding . FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $0.594 $0.461 $0.642 368 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Workforce Investment Act (Adult) 60000-2636 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This program provides employment and training for eligible adults. RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 297,865 $ 162 ,650 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 Supplies 1 , 111 1 ,000 1 ,000 1 ,000 Purchased Services 491 ,606 365,700 551 ,875 551 ,875 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 790, 582 $ 529, 350 $ 852,875 $ 852 ,875 Revenue 790, 582 529, 350 852 ,875 852 ,875 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions 5 5 6 6 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated in this program for 2015. However, as fiscal pressures are dealt with , at the Federal and State levels, changes could be forthcoming that will affect this funding . FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Clients served 278 180 235 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $2 .922 $ 1 .923 $3.008 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Entered employment rate 60% I 75% 75% 369 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Workforce Investment Act (Youth ; 60000-2637 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This program provides employment and training programs for in-school and out-of-school youth . RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 517,552 $ 345,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 Supplies 2 ,559 4,000 30,000 30,000 Purchased Services 152 , 164 137,300 160,000 160,000 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 672,275 $ 486, 300 $ 690,000 $ 690, 000 Revenue 672 ,275 486,300 690,000 690,000 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions 7 7 8 8 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated in this program for 2015 . However, as fiscal pressures are dealt with , at the Federal and State levels, changes could be forthcoming that will affect this funding . FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Youth served 270 270 225 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $2 .484 $ 1 .766 $2.434 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Entered Employment rate (Older Youth ) 66% 65% 67% Skill Attainment rate (Younger Youth ) 67% 65% 69% 370 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: 10% Incentive Grant (CIMS) 60000-2639 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: To foster the development and continuous improvements of the Weld County region workforce system . RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 10,417 $ 25,000 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 6,253 15,000 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 16,670 $ 40,000 $ 0 $ 0 Revenue 16,670 40,000 0 0 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: This funding was not made available to local workforce centers for the 2013- 14 State Fiscal Year and will likely continue to be unfunded during the 2014-15 Year. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $0.062 $0. 145 $0.000 371 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND Workforce Investment Act BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Statewide Activities Grant) 60000-2640 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: These funds are incentive grants based on performance of the WIA programs and are used for staff training , administration , contracted services and other programs. RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 0 0 0 0 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: This funding was not made available to local workforce centers for the 2013- 14 State Fiscal Year and will likely continue to be unfunded during the 2014-15 Year. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 , 372 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND Workforce Investment Act BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: (Dislocated Worker Program) 60000-2643 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This program provides retraining for laid off clients. RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 169, 113 $ 240,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 Supplies 5,541 2 ,000 2 ,000 2 ,000 Purchased Services 206,805 244,300 248,000 248 ,000 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 381 ,459 $ 486, 300 $ 500,000 $ 500, 000 Revenue 381 ,459 486, 300 500,000 500,000 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions 2 2 2 2 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated in this program for 2015. However, as fiscal pressures are dealt with , at the Federal and State levels, changes could be forthcoming that will affect this funding . FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Clients served 161 165 120 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $ 1 .410 $ 1 .766 $ 1 .764 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Entered employment rate 91 % 90% 79% 373 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Educational Lab - - 60000-2645 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This fund covers the cost of operating the Computer Education Lab. RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 259,479 $ 240,000 $ 255,000 $ 255,000 Supplies 31 ,870 33,000 40,000 40,000 Purchased Services 56,389 54,000 55,000 55,000 Gross County Cost $ 347,738 $ 327, 000 $ 350,000 $ 350, 000 Revenue 293, 836 327, 000 350,000 350,000 Net County Cost $ 53,902 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions 3 3 4 4 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated in this program for 2015 . However, as fiscal pressures are dealt with , at the Federal and State levels, changes could be forthcoming that will affect this funding . FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Clients served 1 ,350 1 ,350 2 ,500 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $ 1 .285 $ 1 . 188 1 .235 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) GED's obtained 120 120 100 374 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: AmeriCorps Program - - 60000-2646 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: The AmeriCorps Program is a youth corps work program . RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 146,643 $ 185,000 $ 185,000 $ 185,000 Supplies 1 ,307 2 , 500 2 ,500 2,500 Purchased Services 12 ,285 7,500 7,500 7,500 Fixed Charges 550 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 160,785 $ 195, 000 $ 195,000 $ 195, 000 Revenue 134,903 195, 000 195,000 195,000 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated in this program for 2015 . However, as fiscal pressures are dealt with , at the Federal and State levels, changes could be forthcoming that will affect this funding . FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Participants in program 47 30 30 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $0.594 $0.708 $0.688 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Clients completing program 40 30 30 375 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Tight Corp Program - - 60000-2648 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Youth Corp Program RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 134,367 $ 120,000 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 4,529 3,000 0 0 Purchased Services 93,714 67,000 0 0 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 232,610 $ 190,000 $ 0 $ 0 Revenue 224,761 190,000 0 0 Net County Cost $ 7,849 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: This program was previously reflected as an intra-county, inter- fund transfer between the Human Services Fund and the Social Services Fund . It is now wholly located within the Social Services Fund Budget document. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . Concur with the accounting changes for the Tight Corp Program . BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Participants 24 24 N/A Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $0.860 $0 .690 $0.000 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Participants completing program 19 20 N/A 376 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Area Agency on Aging (Admin . ) 60000-2651 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This Older American's Act Grant administers the Senior programs of the Area Agency on Aging . RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 47, 149 $ 85,000 $ 85,000 $ 85,000 Supplies 434 0 500 500 Purchased Services 7,806 7,500 7,000 7 ,000 Gross County Cost $ 55, 389 $ 92 , 500 $ 92 ,500 $ 92 , 500 Revenue 55, 389 92 , 500 80, 149 80, 149 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 12 ,351 $ 12,351 Budget Positions 3 3 3 3 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated in this program for 2015 . However, as fiscal pressures are dealt with , at the Federal and State levels, changes could be forthcoming that will affect this funding . FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Programs administered 11 11 11 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost (other) $0.205 $0.336 $0.326 377 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Area Agency on Aging (Support) 60000-2652 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This grant provides several contracted services to the elderly; adult day care, ombudsman services, peer counseling , outreach , respite services and legal counseling . RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 122 ,668 $ 110,000 $ 97,716 $ 97,716 Supplies 38 0 0 0 Purchased Services 105, 149 149,855 122 ,243 122,243 Gross County Cost $ 227, 855 $ 259, 855 $ 219,959 $ 219, 959 Revenue 227, 855 259, 855 219,959 219,959 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions 4 4 4 4 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated in this program for 2015 . However, as fiscal pressures are dealt with , at the Federal and State levels, changes could be forthcoming that will affect this funding . FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . 378 HUMAN SERVICES AREA ON AGING (CONTINUED) 60000-2652 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Outreach — Hispanic Senior Outreach 1 ,000 1 ,000 1 , 000 Adult day care 1 ,700 1 ,700 1 ,700 Peer Counseling 2 ,000 2 ,000 2 ,000 Legal consultation/representation 800 800 800 Homemaker and personal care 2 ,270 2,270 2,270 Ombudsman Services 1 ,600 1 ,600 1 ,600 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $0.842 $0.944 $0.776 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Work output goals are maintained Yes Yes Yes 379 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND Area Agency on Aging BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: (Congregate Meal Program) 60000-2653 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This grant provides meals to the senior population at 23 nutrition sites around the county. RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 145,889 $ 150,000 $ 141 ,427 $ 141 ,427 Supplies 54,503 10,000 10,000 10,000 Purchased Services 334,473 345,000 378,619 378,619 Fixed Charges 0 0 1 ,600 1 ,600 Gross County Cost $ 534,865 $ 505, 000 $ 531 ,646 $ 531 ,646 Revenue 522 , 514 492 ,649 531 ,646 531 ,646 Net County Cost $ 12,351 $ 12 ,351 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions 3 3 3 3 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated in this program for 2015 . However, as fiscal pressures are dealt with , at the Federal and State levels, changes could be forthcoming that will affect this funding . FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Meals served 50,000 50,000 50,000 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $ 1 .977 $ 1 .835 $ 1 .875 380 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERV CES FUND Area Agency on Aging BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: (Home Delivered Meals) 60000-2654 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This grant provides home delivered meals through Meals on Wheels. RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 62 ,206 44,000 75,000 75,000 Gross County Cost $ 62,206 $ 44, 000 $ 75,000 $ 75, 000 Revenue 62 ,206 44, 000 75,000 75,000 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated in this program for 2015 . However, as fiscal pressures are dealt with , at the Federal and State levels, changes could be forthcoming that will affect this funding . FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Meals Served 48,979 50, 000 50,000 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $0.230 $0. 160 $0.265 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Work output goals are maintained . Yes Yes Yes 381 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Area Agency on Aging (Health Services) 60000-2655 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This grant provides health services to the senior community. This grant supports evidence-based health programs. RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 12 ,443 $ 9,798 $ 26,600 $ 26,600 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 420 2 ,000 600 600 Gross County Cost $ 12 ,863 $ 11 ,798 $ 27,200 $ 27,200 Revenue 12 , 863 11 ,798 27,200 27,200 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions 1 1 1 1 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated in this program for 2015 . However, as fiscal pressures are dealt with , at the Federal and State levels, changes could be forthcoming that will affect this funding . FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Clients served 300 300 300 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $0.048 $0.043 $0 .096 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Work output goals are maintained Yes I Yes Yes 382 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND Area Agency on Aging (Colorado Health BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Foundation ; 60000-2656 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This grant provides health services to the senior community, providing long-term care information and assistance for individuals 18 years of age and older. RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 22 ,268 $ 14,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 2 ,087 1 ,000 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 24, 355 $ 15 , 000 $ 30,000 $ 30, 000 Revenue 24, 355 15, 000 30,000 30,000 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The ARCH Grant expired during 2014. However, the Department has been granted funding for comparable services from the Colorado Health Foundation , and will continue to provide these services under that funding . FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $0.090 $0.054 $0. 106 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Work output goals are maintained Yes Yes Yes 383 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND Area Agency on Aging BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: (Elder Abuse Grant) 60000-2657 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This grant provides for educational training to the community on elder abuse. RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 1 ,805 $ 2 ,061 $ 2 ,027 $ 2 ,027 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 1 , 805 $ 2 , 061 $ 2 ,027 $ 2 , 027 Revenue 1 , 805 2 , 061 2 ,027 2 , 027 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated in this program for 2015 . However, as fiscal pressures are dealt with , at the Federal and State levels, changes could be forthcoming that will affect this funding . FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Ombudsman Services 200 200 200 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $0.007 $0.007 $0.007 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Education of long term staff Yes Yes Yes 384 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND Area Agency on Aging BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: (Special Ombudsman ) 60000-2658 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: These funds supplement the ombudsman program . RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 6,261 $ 5,675 $ 5,958 $ 5,958 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 961 1 ,200 1 ,000 1 ,000 Gross County Cost $ 7,222 $ 6, 875 $ 6,958 $ 6,958 Revenue 7,222 6, 875 6,958 6, 958 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated in this program for 2015 . However, as fiscal pressures are dealt with , at the Federal and State levels, changes could be forthcoming that will affect this funding . FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Complaints investigated 20 20 20 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $0.027 $0.025 $0.025 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Work outputs are maintained Yes Yes Yes 385 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND Area Agency on Aging BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: (Single Entry Point) 60000-265995 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This grant provides case management services to Medicaid eligible clients. RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 1 ,424,916 $ 1 ,637, 900 $ 1 ,652 ,000 $ 1 ,652 ,000 Supplies 12 ,076 0 0 0 Purchased Services 47,268 147,000 168,000 168,000 Gross County Cost $ 1 ,484,260 $ 1 ,784, 900 $ 1 , 820,000 $ 1 ,820, 000 Revenue 1 ,484,260 1 ,784, 900 1 , 820,000 1 ,820,000 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions 27 27 30 30 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated in this program for 2015 . However, as fiscal pressures are dealt with , at the Federal and State levels, changes could be forthcoming that will affect this funding . FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Clients served 1 ,500 1 ,600 1 ,800 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $5.485 $6.483 $6.420 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Divert Medicaid Eligible clients from Institutional care to cost effective home care 1 ,300 1 ,350 1 ,350 386 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Area Agency on Aging (CCT) - - 60000-2660 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This area includes minor sources of funding that supplement the aging programs, including Colorado Choice Transition (CCT). RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 580 $ 0 $ 4,515 $ 4,515 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 580 $ 0 $ 4,515 $ 4,515 Revenue 580 0 4,515 4,515 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: These funds are carried forward from prior a year's grant. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $0.002 $0.000 $.016 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Maintain work output goals Yes Yes Yes 387 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Area Agency on Aging (VALE) - - 60000-2667 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This area includes minor sources of funding that supplement the aging programs. These funds supplement the ombudsman program . RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 10,801 $ 12 ,000 $ 9,059 $ 9,059 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 807 0 600 600 Gross County Cost $ 11 ,608 $ 12 , 000 $ 9,659 $ 9,659 Revenue 11 ,608 12 , 000 9,659 9,659 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The County received decreased funding for this grant, due to state-wide demands. As fiscal pressures are dealt with , at the Federal and State levels, further changes could be forthcoming that will affect this funding . FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Clients served 600 600 600 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $0.043 $0.044 $0 .034 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Maintain work output goals Yes I Yes Yes 388 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Area Agency on Aging (State Funds) - - 60000-2671 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Supplemental funding source started July 1 , 2000, it is a combination of HB-1108 funds and General Fund Long Bill monies. RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 107,408 $ 108,000 $ 284,332 $ 284,332 Supplies 92 ,718 27,000 44,000 44,000 Purchased Services 353, 121 504,511 543,000 543 ,000 Gross County Cost $ 553,247 $ 639, 511 $ 871 ,332 $ 871 , 332 Revenue 553,247 639,511 871 ,332 871 ,332 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions 1 1 1 1 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated in this program for 2015 . However, as fiscal pressures are dealt with , at the Federal and State levels, changes could be forthcoming that will affect this funding . FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Dental/Vision/Hearing Clients Served 140 150 160 Meals served 14,611 22,612 23,000 Other clients served 8,709 12 ,075 13, 000 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $2.045 $2.323 $3.073 389 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Part E Family Caregiver Support - - 60000-2673 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This program provides support to family who are caring for relatives at home. RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 33,654 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 Supplies 229 0 0 0 Purchased Services 31 ,842 47,420 48,629 48,629 Gross County Cost $ 65,725 $ 87,420 $ 88,629 $ 88,629 Revenue 65,725 87,420 88,629 88,629 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions 1 1 1 1 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated in this program for 2015. However, as fiscal pressures are dealt with , at the Federal and State levels, changes could be forthcoming that will affect this funding . FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Care giver Support - units of services 2 ,500 3,000 4, 000 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $0.243 $0.318 $0. 313 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Maintain requirements of grant Yes Yes Yes 390 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Community Services Block Grant - - 60000-267895 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This grant provides a range of community services to the low income and elderly of the community. RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 48,657 $ 47,200 $ 60,500 $ 60,500 Purchased Services 31 ,656 120,898 242,675 242,675 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 80, 313 $ 168, 098 $ 303, 175 $ 303, 175 Revenue 80,313 168, 098 303, 175 303, 175 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: This program was previously split between the Human Services Fund and the Social Services Fund . It is now wholly tracked within the Human Services Fund . Funding from the Colorado Department of Local Affairs was initially cut during the 2013- 14 Program Year. The cut was almost fully restored , which should enable the county to fund the services that have been traditionally funded under this program into the foreseeable future. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Employment opportunities low-income unskilled adult labor force 2 ,000 2 ,000 2,000 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $0.297 $0.611 $ 1 .069 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Work output goals maintained Yes Yes Yes 391 \3/4 %, \.. 1861 ./e P:L=" \arsE .- 11-4-5,) CIL _G U N _ I.- 392 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Special Revenue Funds are established to account for taxes or other earmarked revenue of the county which finance specified activities as required by law or administrative action . CONTINGENCY FUND: The Contingency Fund is funded at the level of $10,000,000 with $ 10,000,000 from carry-over fund balance. A beginning fund balance of $35, 000,000 is anticipated . An ending fund balance of $35, 000,000 is projected , assuming no contingency funds are needed in 2015. The fund balance will serve as a stabilization reserve for fluctuating revenues due to Weld County's heavy dependency on oil and gas assessed values that can fluctuate dramatically from year to year due to production levels and price changes. Besides serving as a general contingency reserve, the fund is available to mitigate impacts from the oil and gas industry, such as unanticipated road and bridge heavy hauling impacts. SOLID WASTE FUND: The Solid Waste Fund is funded at the anticipated revenue level of fees at $ 1 , 100,000. There is an anticipated beginning fund balance of $ 1 ,200, 000. The Department of Public Health and Environment costs for the Household Hazardous Waste program will be $446,405. $40,000 is budgeted for community clean-ups, and $90,000 to fund the roadside trash pick-up program with Useful Public Service clients. $ 136, 593 is funded for solid waste inspections and monitoring by the Health Department. $40,000 is funded for the solid waste tank disposal at the Island Grove Livestock Barn . $77, 115 is budget for indirect costs. Since the landfill sites no longer impact county roads due to being located off of state highways, no funds are provided for road projects to mitigate landfill impacts. There is $ 184,887 included in the budget that is undesignated . CONSERVATION TRUST FUND: The Conservation Trust Fund is budgeted at $486,520 based upon the anticipated operating costs for 2015. The budget reflects funding of Island Grove Park only. Revenues are from the Colorado Lottery proceeds. EMERGENCY RESERVE FUND: The Emergency Reserve Fund was established per Amendment One (TABOR), passed November 3, 1992. The amendment requires that an emergency reserve be created to be used for declared emergencies only. It also requires each local government to reserve one percent or more for 1993, two percent or more for 1994, and three percent or more for all later years of the fiscal year spending , excluding bonded debt service. Caused reserves apply to the next year's reserve. With the adoption of the new accounting rules under GASB 54 the three-percent TABOR emergency reserve required by Article X, Section 20(5) of the Colorado Constitution shall be a restricted fund balance in the General Fund in an amount equal to six-million dollars or three-percent of the TABOR revenue limit, whichever is greater. This Emergency Reserve Fund will no longer be used to budget or account for the TABOR emergency reserve. 393 CONSERVATION TRUST SUMMARY OF REVENUES 2015 2014 2015 2015 2015 Fund Ord Acct Account Title Budget Request Recommend Final LOTTERY 2200 73700 4332 LOTTERY 412,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 MISCELLANEOUS 2200 73700 4610 EARNINGS ON INVESTMENTS 3,000 2500 2,500 2,500 TOTAL CONSERVATION TRUST 415,000 452,500 452,500 452,500 394 CONSERVATION TRUST SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2015 2014 2015 2015 2015 Fund Org Expenditure Function Budget Request Recommend Final 2200 73700 CONSERVATION TRUST 440,296 486,520 486,520 486,520 TOTAL CONSERVATION TRUST 440,296 486,520 486,520 486,520 395 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: CONSERVATION TRUST FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Conservation Trust Fund - - 2200-73700 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Accounts for revenue received from the State of Colorado to be used for the acquisition , development, and maintenance of new conservation sites within Weld County. RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 406,647 440,296 486, 520 486, 520 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 406,647 $ 440,296 $ 486,520 $ 486, 520 Revenue/Fund 453,066 440,296 486,520 486,520 Balance Net County Cost $ - 46,419 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Revenue from the Colorado Lottery is being projected at $450,000 and $2 , 500 from interest earnings. For 2015, the budget for the county buildings at Island Grove Park is proposed at $610,520. This represents an increase from the 2014 budget of $52,724 or 9.45 percent. Revenue from rents and facility use fees for 2015 is estimated at $124,000, which is an increase of $6, 500 from 2014. The county payment for 2015 is proposed at $486,520, which is an increase of $46,224 from the 2014 payment of $440,296 or an increase of 10.5 percent. The increase in the 2015 county payment reflects the increase in salaries granted and the adding back of a position cut in 2007, utility increases, and cost of repairs. The workload is increasing from getting more and more requests from Extension and 4-H for use of the facilities without any added revenue. Historically, when the final costs are reconciled with the City of Greeley at the end of the year the amount paid by the county is less than budgeted . No funds are allocated for capital improvements to the buildings. Since 2002 , the Missile Site Park has been funded in the General Fund . FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . 396 CONSERVATION TRUST FUND (CONTINUED) 2200- 73700 FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION (CONTINUED): Historically, the following is the amount of money received annually since the lottery started : 1983 $ 194,698 1998 $373, 962 1984 195,304 1999 286,971 1985 151 , 033 2000 358, 802 1986 138, 069 2001 361 , 050 1987 162,736 2002 391 , 780 1988 154, 074 2003 385, 070 1989 130,764 2004 361 ,926 1990 136, 726 2005 371 ,213 1991 200, 103 2006 453,233 1992 220 ,219 2007 423,260 1993 264 ,371 2008 430,795 1994 205,534 2009 408,648 1995 327 , 162 2010 386, 999 1996 312,024 2011 376,031 1997 356,262 2012 411 ,891 2013 450,659 The funds have been used for maintenance and development of Island Grove Park and the Missile Site Park, with the exception of the following items: Entity Purpose Amount 1983: Greeley Civic Auditorium $ 141 ,464 1984: Greeley Civic Auditorium $ 143,000 1985: Greeley Civic Auditorium $ 90,000 1986: Greeley Civic Auditorium $ 51 ,500 LaSalle Community Center 10,000 Ault Park System 7,500 Dacono Park Improvements 3,000 Windsor Park Improvements 6, 000 Ft. Lupton Pearsin Park Sports Complex 10, 000 Independence Stampede Headquarters Facility 5,000 Since 1987 all funds have gone to the two county parks. Beginning in 2002, only Island Grove Park has been funded . 397 CONSERVATION TRUST FUND (CONTINUED) 2200- 73700 FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION (CONTINUED): In 1984, the Board adopted the following criteria, in priority order, for the use and allocation of Weld County lottery funds. This policy remains in force today: 1 . To maintain and develop the two existing county parks. 2 . Projects must enhance the quality of life for the citizens of Weld County. 3. Projects must contribute to, or compliment, the economic development activities of Weld County. 4. Projects must have an area impact or significance. 5. Funds used for local community projects must have substantial local support. 6. Outside of existing county parks, no operating funds shall be contributed to projects. PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Island Grove Park Visitors 418,700 420,000 420,000 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost (county support) $1 .48 $ 1 .59 $ 1 .72 Cost Per Visitor $0.97 $ 1 . 05 $ 1 . 16 BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . 398 CONTINGENCY SUMMARY OF REVENUES 2015 2014 2015 2015 2015 Fund Orq Acct Account Title Budget Request Recommend Final TAXES 2300 90300 4112 CURRENT PROPERTY TAXES 5,000,000 5,000.000 5.000,000 0 TOTAL CONTINGENCY 5,000,000 5,000,000 5,000,000 0 399 CONTINGENCY SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2015 2014 2015 2015 2015 Fund Org Expenditure Function Budget Request Recommend Final 2300 90300 CONTINGENT 10,000,000 10;000,000 10,000,000 10,000;000 TOTAL CONTINGENCY 10,000,000 10,000,000 10,000,000 10,000,000 400 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: CONTINGENCY FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Contingency Fund - - 2300-90300 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: The Contingency Fund exists to cover reasonably unforeseen expenditures or revenue short-falls. RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 0 0 0 0 Fixed Charges 5,000,000 10,000,000 10 ,000, 000 10, 000, 000 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 5,000,000 $ 10,000,000 $ 10,000,000 $ 10,000,000 Revenue/Fund Bal . 6,967,685 5 ,000,000 5,000,000 10, 000, 000 Net County Cost $ 11 ,967,685 $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The Contingency Fund is funded at the level of $ 10,000,000 with $ 10,000, 000 from carry-over fund balance. A beginning fund balance of $35, 000, 000 is anticipated . An ending fund balance of $35, 000, 000 is projected , assuming no contingency funds are needed in 2015. The fund balance will serve as a stabilization reserve for fluctuating revenues due to Weld County's heavy dependency on oil and gas assessed values that can fluctuate dramatically from year to year due to production levels and price changes. Besides serving as a general contingency reserve, the fund is available to mitigate impacts from the oil and gas industry, such as unanticipated road and bridge heavy hauling impacts. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . BOARD ACTION: In order to fully fund the Retirement Plan the Board reduced the property tax revenue by $5,000,000 in the Final Budget. The reserve level of the fund will be at $35,000,000 for 2015-2016. The property tax amount reduced in 2015 will be replenished in 2017 in order to fund an anticipated reserve level of $45, 000, 000 in 2017. 401 EMERGENCY RESERVE SUMMARY OF REVENUES 2015 2014 2015 2015 2015 Fund Ord Acct Account Title Budget Request Recommend Final TAXES 2400 53100 4112 CURRENT PROPERTY TAXES 0 0 0 0 TOTAL EMERGENCY RESERVE 0 0 0 0 402 EMERGENCY RESERVE SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2015 2014 2015 2015 2015 Fund Org Expenditure Function Budget Request Recommend Final 2400 53100 EMERGENCY RESERVE 0 0 0 0 TOTAL EMERGENCY RESERVE 0 0 0 0 403 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: EMERGENCY RESERVE FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Emergency Reserve - - 2400-53100 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: The Emergency Reserve Fund is established per Amendment One (TABOR), passed November 3, 1992, which requires that an emergency reserve be established to be used for declared emergencies only, and that each local government shall reserve for 1993, 1 percent or more, for 1994, 2 percent or more, and for all later years, 3 percent or more of the fiscal year spending , excluding bonded debt service. Caused reserves apply to the next year's reserve. RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 0 0 0 0 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: With the adoption of the new accounting rules under GASB 54 the three-percent TABOR emergency reserve required by Article X, Section 20(5) of the Colorado Constitution shall be a restricted fund balance in the General Fund in an amount equal to six- million dollars or three-percent of the TABOR revenue limit, whichever is greater. This Emergency Reserve Fund will no longer be used to budget or account for the TABOR emergency reserve. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Concur with policy per GASB 54. BOARD ACTION: Reaffirmed policy per GASB 54. 404 SOLID WASTE SUMMARY OF REVENUES 2015 2014 2015 2015 2015 Fund Ord Acct Account Title Budget Request Recommend Final CHARGE FOR SERVICES 2700 90200 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 900,000 1 ,100,000 1 ,100,000 1 ,100,000 TOTAL SOLID WASTE 900,000 1 ,100,000 1 ,100,000 1 ,100,000 405 SOLID WASTE SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2015 2014 2015 2015 2015 Fund Org Expenditure Function Budget Request Recommend Final 2700 21240 TRANSFER 85,000 85,000 85,000 85,000 2700 90200 SOLID WASTE 247,717 432,002 432,002 432,002 2700 90200 TRANSFER 567,283 582,998 582,998 582,998 TOTAL SOLID WASTE 900,000 1 ,100,000 1 ,100,000 1 ,100,000 406 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: SOLID WASTE FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Code Enforcement - - 2700-21240 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This budget accounts for code enforcement for littering , illegal dumping , and roadside trash pick-up program . RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 85, 000 85, 000 85, 000 85, 000 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 85,000 $ 85,000 $ 85,000 $ 85,000 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 85,000 $ 85,000 $ 85, 000 $ 85,000 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The Code Enforcement function has been combined with the Animal Control function in the Sheriff's Office. The cost of the code enforcement function is $85, 000. See budget unit number 1000-21230 for a detailed discussion of the program . FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval and funding of program from the Solid Waste surcharge. BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Number of Complaints 785 800 800 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost (county support) $0.314 $0.309 $0.300 GOALS/DESIRED OUTCOMES/KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: See Sheriff Public Safety Bureau (Budget Unit 1000-21200) goals. 407 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: SOLID WASTE FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Solid Waste Fund - - 2700-90200 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This fund accounts for revenue received from a surcharge on dumping fees at solid waste disposal sites to combat environmental problems, promote trash clean-up, provide for the household hazardous materials program , and to further improve and develop landfill sites within the county. RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Purchased Services 72 ,398 217,286 170, 000 417,286 Fixed Charges 601 ,886 597,714 845,000 597, 714 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 674,284 $ 815,000 $ 1 ,015,000 $ 1 ,015, 000 Revenue 1 ,440,065 900,000 1 , 100,000 1 , 100,000 Net County Cost $ - 765,782 $ - 85,000 $ - 85,000 $ - 85,000 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The revenue estimate is $ 1 , 100,000, up from $900,000 due to special waste from oil and gas activity. The Department of Public Health and Environment costs for the Household Hazardous Waste program will be $446,405. $40,000 is budgeted for community clean-ups, and $90,000 to fund the roadside trash pick-up program with Useful Public Service clients. $ 136,593 is funded for solid waste inspections and monitoring by the Health Department. $40,000 is funded for the solid waste tank disposal at the Island Grove Livestock Barn . $77, 115 is budget for indirect costs. Since the landfill sites no longer impact county roads due to being located off of state highways, no funds are provided for road projects to mitigate landfill impacts. There is $ 184,887 included in the budget that is undesignated . FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . There are $184,887 in undesignated funds in the 2015 budget to mitigate impacts of landfills, such as road access, cleanups, and transfer stations. A $ 1 ,200,000 fund balance also exists for the same needs, if required . BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . 408 SOLID WASTE FUND (CONTINUED) 2700-90200 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Landfill Inspections 45 45 45 Household Hazardous Material (HHM ) $373, 127 $425,493 $446,405 Surcharge Collected $730,000 $900,000 $ 1 , 100,000 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost (collected) $2.49 $3.27 $3.88 Per capita HHM cost $ 1 .38 $ 1 .55 $1 .57 409 ei �,�86latge- ixTrE =(,) ....... , c4� IT i 410 SEVEN YEAR TREND Capital Expenditures 18,000,000 16,000,000 14,000,000 12,000,000 - 10,000,000 - 0 0 0 0 8,000,000 6,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 o co o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,000,000 1141 0 - - 0 0 � 0 0 o co o ti 0 2,000.000 _ 0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 411 CAPITAL EXPENDITURES FUND SUMMARY The Capital Expenditures Fund was established to budget the financial resources used for the acquisition or improvement of capital facilities of the county. A detailed Long Range Capital Plan for 2015-2019 is presented in this section and relates to the specifics of the 2015 capital project budget. The Capital Expenditures Fund accounts for various capital improvement projects for county buildings. The 2015 program is funded at $1 , 114,000, with $125,000 from capital expansion fees, and $400,000 from interest. Anticipated projects include $300,000 for a grader shed for Public Works, and $814,000 for special projects. A carry-over beginning fund balance of $24,400, 000 is anticipated , and $23,811 ,000 ending reserve fund balance for the future jail expansion ($ 19,561 ,000), Communications System reserve ($2 ,850,000), and Downtown Greeley land reserve ($ 1 ,400, 000) is anticipated at the end of 2015. Capital projects impacting the 2015 and future years' operational costs include the additional jail space planned for construction in 2017-2018 will impact the operational budget by $ 1 ,210,000 in 2018, $770,000 in 2019, and $ 1 , 100,000 in 2020. Special projects and Public Works facility projects are primarily cosmetic enhancements to buildings that will not impact operating costs, but will improve the appearance and functionality of the buildings involved . 412 CAPITAL EXPENDITURES SUMMARY OF REVENUES 2015 2014 2015 2015 2015 Fund Orq Acct Account Title Budget Request Recommend Final TAXES 4000 17500 4112 CURRENT PROPERTY TAXES 8,250,000 8,250,000 8,250,000 0 INTERGOVERNMENTAL 4000 17500 4610 EARNINGS ON INVESTMENTS 300,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 MISCELLANEOUS 4000 17500 4730 OTHER FEES 100,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 8,650,000 8,775,000 8,775,000 525,000 413 CAPITAL EXPENDITURE SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2015 2014 2015 2015 2015 Fund Org Expenditure Function Budget Request Recommend Final 4000 17500 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT AND ACQUISITION 8,650,000 8,775,000 8,775,000 1 , 114,000 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 8,650,000 8,775,000 8,775,000 1 ,114,000 414 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: CAPITAL EXPENDITURE FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Capital Expenditures - - 4000-17500 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Capital projects for general county use. Created in accordance with Section 29-1 -301 ( 1 .2), C. R.S . , April 5, 1984. Formerly Public Works - County Buildings Fund (Fund 33). RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY , Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 0 0 0 0 Capital 8,903,950 8 ,650,000 8,775 ,000 1 , 114 ,000 Gross County Cost $ 8,903, 950 $ 8,650,000 $ 8,775 ,000 $ 1 , 114,000 Revenue/Fund Bal . 1 ,723,339 400,000 525,000 525,000 Net County Cost $ 7, 180,611 $ 8 ,250,000 $ 8,250 ,000 $ 589,000 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The Capital Expenditures Fund accounts for various capital improvement projects for county buildings. The 2015 program is funded at $ 1 , 114,000, with $ 125,000 from capital expansion fees, and $400,000 from interest. Anticipated projects include $300,000 for a grader shed for Public Works, and $814,000 for special projects. A carry-over beginning fund balance of $24,400,000 is anticipated , and $23,811 ,000 ending reserve fund balance for the future jail expansion ($ 19,561 ,000), Communications System reserve ($2 ,850,000), and Downtown Greeley land reserve ($ 1 ,400,000) is anticipated at the end of 2015. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Budget reflects the 2015 funding level of the Proposed Long Range Capital Plan for 2015 - 2019. The actual plan is on the pages immediately following . BOARD ACTION: In order to fully fund the Retirement Plan the Board reduced the property tax revenue by $8,250,000. The property tax amount reduced in 2015 will be replenished in 2017 in order to fund the anticipated jail construction . Net effect is the five year capital plan will remain the same, but will have a different cash flow during 2015-2016. 415 WELD COUNTY LONG RANGE CAPITAL PROJECTS FIVE-YEAR PLAN 2015 - 2019 Presented By: Donald D . Warden Director of Budget Management and Analysis September, 2014 416 LONG RANGE CAPITAL PROJECTS FIVE YEAR PLAN 2015 - 2019 INTRODUCTION: Section 14-3 of the Weld County Home Rule Charter provides: "The Board may require that the Director of Finance and Administration submit, at the time of submission of the annual budget, a five-year capital improvements program and budget. Such program shall include recommended projects, construction schedule, estimate of cost, anticipated revenue sources, methods of financing , and such other information as may be required ." This five-year plan projects capital improvements for 2015 - 2019. The recommended program for capital construction is intended as a guideline to be adjusted by the Board of County Commissioners on an annual basis. It represents flexible goals for organizing solutions to county program needs, and it is intended to provide the Board of County Commissioners with the perspective for making fiscal policy decisions. Annual modifications in the plan will reflect necessary adjustments and priorities, changes in programs, and readjustments of other county fiscal requirements. This report has four (4) sections: 1 . Introduction 2 . Financing Alternatives 3. 2015 - 2019 Five-year Plan 4. 2015 Budgetary Impact The section on financing recommends a program for funding the next five years' capital construction . This section lists the various sources of revenue currently available to the county, and the alternatives available for financing the remainder of the capital projects program . The 2015 - 2019 five-year plan section provides a list of recommended projects and the time schedule for the next five fiscal years. Additionally, it provides justification for the recommendation and attempts to enumerate problems and recommended solutions for the capital improvements program over the next five years. The project section describes each recommended project, and provides information on the existing situation , the proposed solution , and the financing plan for each project. The last section of the report provides a recommended 2015 budget for the capital construction program . It provides specific detail regarding each recommended project and the impact on the 2015 county budget. 417 FINANCING ALTERNATIVES 418 FINANCING Overview: There are a number of ways to finance capital improvement projects. Some of the most common methods are: 1 . Pay as you go: Pay as you go is a method of financing capital projects with current revenues -- paying cash instead of borrowing against future revenues. Pay as you go has several advantages. First, it saves interest cost. Second , pay as you go protects borrowing capacity for unforeseen major outlays that are beyond any current year's capacity. Third , when coupled with regular, steady completion of capital improvements and good documentation and publicity, pay as you go fosters favorable bond ratings when long term financing is undertaken . Finally, the technique avoids the inconvenience and considerable cost associated with marketing of bond issues, advisors, counsel , printing , etc. However, there are practical and theoretical disadvantages to a pay as you go policy. First, pay as you go puts a heavy burden on the project year. Second , it creates awkward fluctuating expenditure cycles which do not occur with extended financing . Third , a long life asset should be paid for by its users throughout its normal life rather than all at once by those who may not have the use of it for the full term . Finally, when inflation is driving up construction costs, it may be cheaper to borrow and pay today's prices rather than wait and pay tomorrow's. 2 . All borrowing policy: An all borrowing policy or a substantial reliance on debt financing is another approach . The annual available resources could be used entirely for debt service with the size of the annual resources setting the limit on the amount that could be borrowed . 3. Capital reserve: A capital reserve plan is an approach where the annual resources available could be accumulated in one or more capital reserve funds, the amounts invested , and when any funds become adequate to pay for a proposed project, the fund could be expended . This is a good approach when a county has a capital requirement which can wait. Accumulation of the necessary capital funds over a period of time is a feasible approach , assuming a relatively stable construction dollar. HB 82- 1111 , passed in 1982 , specifically provides for a capital improvements trust fund for capital reserves. 419 4. Partial pay as you go policy: A partial pay as you go policy is a common approach . Some of the annual resources would be used to finance capital improvements directly, and the remainder would go for supporting a debt program . Even if a local government pursues a borrowing policy, an initial down payment out of current revenues is a possibility. A customary five to ten percent down is a limited pay as you go policy, and assures that the voters authorizing the approval will make a cash contribution so all of the burden will not be postponed . 5. Joint financing: An ever increasing number of cities and counties are benefitting from joint development of a project. The construction of a city/county office building and recreational areas are examples. This avenue of funding and planning capital projects normally is advantageous to both jurisdictions. 6. Lease/Purchase: Local governments can utilize lease/purchase methods for needed public works projects by having it constructed by a private company or authority. The facility is then leased by the jurisdiction on an annual or a monthly rental . At the end of the lease period , the title to the facility can be conveyed to the jurisdiction without any future payments. The rental over the years will have paid the total original cost plus interest. This method has been used successfully in a number of jurisdictions. The utilization of a building authority would fall under this category of financing . Numerous considerations are involved in the selection of the foregoing approaches, or some combination thereof: 1 . Political realities may preclude utilization of one or more of the above alternatives. For example, the passage of general obligation bonds as a debt financing mechanism has not met recent success at the polling places in most jurisdictions. 2 . The pay as you go concept has three distinct advantages. A. It provides great flexibility to the county for future periods of economic recession or depression but does not accumulate large fixed-charge costs. B . It avoids the payment of interest charges. C. It imposes upon public officials the full political responsibility for levy of the taxes necessary to pay the local share of such projects. 3. The debt financing approach has the advantage of spreading the cost over a generation of current users of public facilities, thereby imposing upon each a significant portion of the cost of each project. 4. In an inflationary period , one must take into account the extent to which prepayment for capital outlay is warranted , when the opportunity for repayment of the principal and interest in dollars that are less expensive can be arranged . 420 5. During periods of rapid rise in costs, the time delay necessary to accumulate down payments or full pay as you go resources invites higher costs which may wipe out most, if not all , of the advantages of non-payment of interest. In the five-year capital projects plan , a combination of funding methods will be recommended to finance capital construction in an attempt to balance the economy of a payment in full program with the fairness of sharing the burden among present and future taxpayers. This recommended financial program reflects consideration of many factors, including the availability of cash , anticipated interest rates at the time of construction , and projected inflationary cost increases that would result from project delays. 421 DEBT FINANCING Before discussing specific types of borrowing , it is appropriate to review some of the basic constitutional statutory provisions which generally are applicable to debt financing . Article XI , Section 6, of the Colorado Constitution , provides that no debt may be created by a political subdivision of the state, unless the question of incurring such debt has been approved by a majority of the qualified electorate voting . Any obligation paid , or contracted to be paid , out of a fund that is a product of a tax levy is a debt within the means of the Constitution (Trinidad vs. Haxby, 136 Colorado 168, 315 p 2d 204 -- 1957). In addition to voter approval , Article XI , Section 6, requires the debt be incurred by adoption of a legislative measure which is irrevocable until the indebtedness is fully paid or discharged . The ordinance must: 1 . Set forth the purpose for which the bond proceeds will be applied , and 2 . Provide for the levy of the tax which , together with such other revenues as may be pledged , will be sufficient to pay the principal and interest of the debt. The Constitution delegates to the Legislature the duty to establish statutory limitations on the incurrence of debt. The total amount of debt which a county may incur may not exceed three percent (3%) of the assessed value in the county, which is over $240 million dollars in Weld County. Section 4 of Article X, Section 20 (TABOR Amendment), requires voter approval for any form of multi-year debt. It states that an election is required : "Except for the refinancing of district bonded debt at a lower interest rate or adding new employees to existing district pension plans, creation of any multiple-fiscal year direct or indirect district debt or other financial obligation whatsoever without adequate present cash reserves pledged irrevocable and held for payments in all future fiscal years." In addition to the state statute, Section 14-6 of the Weld County Home Rule Charter specifies: "The incurring of indebtedness by the county and the issuance of evidences of such indebtedness shall be authorized , made and executed in accordance with the laws of the state, including the borrowing of money to fund county projects, the pledging of project revenues and repayment thereof, and the issuance of revenue warrants, or revenue bonds, or other forms of evidence of such obligations." Before discussing specific types of bonds, it is appropriate to review some of the general characteristics of bonds. Bonds mature serially, that is, a portion of the principal is retired over the entire term of the bond issue. Interest on municipal bonds is free from Federal Income Tax which is an important feature to prospective purchasers. The term or the length of time to maturity of municipal bonds can vary considerably. Generally, the last maturing bond comes due ten to thirty years from the date of issue. Normally, the longer the maturity of the bonds, the higher the yields or return on investment is demanded by the market price. Thus, a bond issue that runs thirty years will pay a higher net effective interest rate than a bond issue that runs twenty years. 422 Genera! Obligation Bonds: General obligation bonds are secured by a pledge of the full faith , credit and taxing power of the county. The county is obligated to levy sufficient taxes each year to pay the principal and interest of the bond issue. Consequently, general obligation bonds are a debt subject to the constitutional and statutory provisions discussed earlier. Because the issue of general obligation bond pledges its full faith and credit and agrees to levy the ad valorem taxes necessary to repay the principal and interest of the bond , it is generally agreed to be a more secure investment than other types of bonds. Thus, the major advantage of general obligation financing is the low rate of interest as compared to the interest of other types of bonds. The law permits general obligation bonds to have a thirty-year term ; however, general obligation bond issues usually have terms of twenty years or less. General obligation bonds, in addition to being secured by full faith and credit of the issuer, may provide additional security by pledging certain available revenues. The major disadvantage of general obligation bonds is the fact that it does require voter approval prior to issuance. Voter resistance to increased taxes may prevent a successful bond election . Revenue Bonds: Revenue bonds are not a debt in the constitutional sense. They are secured by the revenue derived from the project to be constructed , not by pledge of the full faith , credit, and taxing authority of the county. Projects typically financed by revenue bonds include airports, stadiums, and park facilities. Under the TABOR Amendment, revenue bonds can only be used for enterprise funds and operations. Although it may seem possible to pledge any non-tax revenues for payment of revenue bonds, there should be a relationship between the type of revenue pledged for payment of the bonds and the project to be financed . Although revenue bonds need not comply with the constitutional statutory provisions generally applicable to a debt, there are several statutory provisions which may affect the issuance of certain types of revenue bonds and the statutes should be consulted for specific provisions regarding the issue of revenue bonds if this method is considered . Revenue bonds are considered to be less secure than general obligation bonds because of the inability of the issuer to levy taxes to assure the payment of principal and interest. Thus, there is normally a higher interest rate on revenue bonds. The term of revenue bonds is often beyond twenty years, frequently as long as thirty years. The concept of issuing revenue bonds is based on the theory that certain projects which benefit only certain individuals should be self-supporting and should be paid for by the user of that project rather than the populace as a whole. Thus, airport revenue bonds are paid for by air travelers and airlines and parking revenue bonds are paid for by users, etc. In order for a county to issue a revenue bond , the system which generates the revenues to repay the principal and interest of the bond must: 1 . Have a good operating history documented by audited figures. 2 . Reflect good debt service coverage through use of a feasibility study completed by a recognized expert in the field . 423 In analyzing a revenue bond issue for underwriting , an investment banker will look not only at operating statistics and coverage, but also at more basic elements, such as the necessity of the service, control over competition , and delinquency procedures. Revenue bonds are becoming more popular because they do not require voter approval and do not apply in statutory debt limits. Leases: A less traditional method of financing county facilities is a lease arrangement. A lease is executed with the county, which gives the county the option to purchase the equipment or facility during the term of the lease. All or part of the lease payments may be applied to the purchase prices. A bona fide lease option agreement is not a debt; however, an installment purchase program is a debt. A bona fide lease/option agreement is characterized by two factors: 1 . Annual rental payments with automatic renewal of the lease unless terminated by either party, and 2 . No obligation on the part of the local government to purchase the property if the lease is terminated . Also, some court cases indicate the annual rental must be paid from non-property tax revenues to avoid the lease being considered a general obligation . Upon exercise of the option , the local government obtains full legal title to the property. Leases of this nature are distinctively different from more conventional means of financing . Of primary importance is the security which underlies the lease period . It is not a promise to levy taxes or a pledge of revenues from the system . Rather, it is usually a promise to pay only one year at a time, with an implied intention to continue payment until ownership is transferred . As ultimate security, the holder of the lease may look to the asset which is being leased in the event of a default. There is little statutory or judicial guidance in the area of leases of this type, and the obligation to continue lease payments until title transfers is a moral , rather than a legal obligation . As a consequence, the underwriting or placement of a lease is more difficult than the underwriting of conventional bonds. The term of the leases generally are short, usually from seven to ten years. Because the security underlying the lease is not good compared with conventional financing , interest rates on leases are higher. 424 Building Authority: A building authority is a non-profit corporation which generally is formed at the request of the governing body of the county or local jurisdiction , which also appoints the Board of Directors of the corporation . Weld County created such an authority in 1987, named the Weld County Finance Corporation . The directors are the Director of Finance, County Attorney, and Director of Buildings and Grounds, each appointed for ten-year terms. The building authority issues its own bonds to finance a facility. To achieve the same lower interest rates that traditional municipal bonds enjoy, the building authority must obtain a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service ( IRS) that the interest on the authority's bonds is exempt from Federal Income Tax. Such an exemption is granted if the IRS finds the authority's bonds are issued on behalf of a political subdivision , which is determined based upon the following factors as detailed in IRS Revenue Ruling 63-20. 1 . The authority engages in activities which are essentially public in nature. 2. The corporation is not organized for profit. 3. The corporate income does not inure to the benefit of any private person . 4. The political subdivision has a beneficial interest in the corporation , while the indebtedness is outstanding , and it obtains full legal title to the property on the retirement of the debt. 5. The corporation has been approved by the political subdivision which has approved the specific obligation of the corporation . Like municipal bonds, bonds issued by a corporation usually are subject to registration and other requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Security Exchange Act of 1934. After receiving a favorable ruling from the IRS , a "no action" letter should be secured from the Security and Exchange Commission , exempting the authority's bonds from these requirements. The authority then issues bonds pledging the annual rental payments as security. After issuance of bonds and construction of the facilities, the authority leases the facilities to the county. Again , this must be a bona fide lease and possess all the elements discussed under Lease/Purchase. The bonds of a building authority are similar to municipal leases in the manner in which they are viewed by investors. As with a simple municipal lease, building authority bonds are less secure than general obligation or revenue bonds. As a result, bonds issued through a building authority bear higher interest than more secure issues. Certificates of Participation (COP) may be issued in the same manner as bonds. As a practical matter the COP is the same as a bond , except from a legal point of view, the COP is evidencing assignment of proportionate undivided interests in rights to receive certain revenues in the form of a lease or rental amount for the purpose of providing funding for capital improvements. The lease and COP do not constitute a general obligation or other indebtedness of the county within the meaning of any constitutional , statutory or home rule charter debt limitation . The lease is a year-to-year obligation . The use of Certificates of Participation (COP) has been the only debt vehicle Weld County has ever used in the implementation of its debt policy options. The only COP issued by Weld County was done in 1997, and was paid off August 1 , 2007. No outstanding debt exists for Weld County. 425 BUILDING AUTHORITY FINANCE The Philosophy: Tax-exempt financing is available through a building authority with the issuance of bonds when the facilities financed are for public purposes and the benefit is to the sponsoring public entity. The Building Authority: A building authority is a Colorado non-profit corporation created by the county itself. The county adopts a resolution calling for the creation of the Building Authority and directing counsel to draw articles of incorporation and by-laws in compliance with Colorado Statutes. A board of directors is formed . The board may consist of County Commissioners or administrative personnel or individuals not associated with any public entity. The Weld County Finance Corporation , created in 1987, consists of the Director of Finance, County Attorney, and Director of Building and Grounds as directors. Tax-Exemption of Interest: Once the non-profit corporation is created , the tax-exempt nature of interest paid on the corporation's bonds must be assured . A revenue ruling is requested from the Internal Revenue Service on the non-profit status of the corporation pursuant to Internal Revenue Code, 103(a) 1 and Revenue Ruling 63-20, and on the tax-exempt status of interest paid . Such an application involves considerable work and a detailed analysis of the situation which is presented to the Internal Revenue Service. The application includes information as to public purpose, the county, the agency using the facilities, the proposed lease terms, terms of title reversion to the county and the proposed method of financing . Corporate Bonds and the S.E. C. : As corporate bonds are subject to registration requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission , a "no action" letter must be obtained from the S . E .C. In essence, the S . E. C. says that no action will be taken if the bonds of the building authority/non-profit corporation are not registered . The Purchase Contract: Once the building authority is created with powers to act, it may enter into a contract to purchase the facility. The contract should be subject to: 1 . A favorable revenue ruling from the Internal Revenue Service. 2 . Receipt of an S . E .C. "no action" letter. 3. Finalization of financing . 426 The Bond Issue: When all legal and tax questions are answered the building authority may issue bonds for the purchase of the facility. Normally the bonds are sold directly to an underwriter who then resells the bonds to the ultimate investor. The bonds that are issued will be an obligation of the building authority only and not a debt obligation of the county. The County Lease: Upon the issuance of the bonds and the purchase of the building by the building authority, the county can lease the building from the authority. The lease would be from year-to-year with automatic renewal unless otherwise terminated . A county lease for any period in excess of one year constitutes a debt and must be approved by voters. The Bond Security: The security of the bond holders may be only in a pledge of lease revenues by the authority. The bond holders may also have a first mortgage lien on the building . The combination of the two results in a more secure bond and a correspondingly lower rate of interest. Partial Seller Financing: Depending on factors such as the seller's motivation , whether there is an existing loan on the building , and negotiations, a bond issue can be for only the amount necessary for a down payment. The sellers can carry back the balance, receiving installment sale tax benefits on the capital gains. A revenue ruling would be required ; however, interest paid on a promissory note to the seller may also be tax exempt. The total cost to the county and the building authority then may be substantially lower on this basis. 427 COMPLETED CAPITAL PROJECTS 2009 - 2013 Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Total 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Centennial Complex $ 3,281 ,672 $ 2 ,983, 137 $ 27,817 $ 102, 165 $ 148,554 $ 19,999 Courthouse 199, 175 191 ,071 8, 104 Land Reserve 19,594 19,594 Stanley Bldg 321 ,921 321 ,921 Grader Sheds 1 , 167,230 1 ,333 271 ,410 518,979 375,508 Motor Pool 230,868 230,868 Health Department 404,931 105, 109 15, 118 69,442 215,262 Island Grove 162,428 60,345 53,800 48,283 North Jail 1 ,369,242 22, 194 696,743 252,363 275,755 122, 187 Back-up Dispatch Center 808,401 808,401 Crime Lab 4 ,337,036 4,500 211 ,966 4, 120,570 Public Works 70,630 7,820 62 ,810 Social Services 2 ,824,022 2 ,743 ,883 80, 139 Gravel Pits 3,050, 193 1 ,659 ,509 1 ,390,684 Southeast Weld Building 72,762 54,026 18,736 North 1401 -1402 535,971 122,386 202,578 211 ,007 County Clinic 550,538 550,538 Admin . Bldg (Skyes) 6,308,870 3,608,942 2 ,639,337 60,591 Alternative Use Bldg 15 , 118 15 , 118 Community Correction Building 5,323, 149 3, 106, 139 2,201 ,892 15, 118 Miscellaneous 285 ,803 48 , 157 177, 174 60 ,472 CNG Station 449,370 90, 117 359,253 Towers 3,921 ,827 1 ,665 , 000 2,256,827 TOTAL $35,710,751 $ 9,287, 109 $ 7,965,402 $ 6,711 ,292 $ 6,634, 132 $ 5, 112,816 NOTE: Expenditures listed in year incurred . 428 FIVE YEAR CAPITAL PROJECTS PROGRAMS 2015- 2019 Requirements Total 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Jail Capital -$16,968,000 -$ 1 ,539,000 $6,974,000 $306, 000 -$18, 199,000 -$4,510,000 Reserve Comm . System 4,750,000 950,000 950,000 950,000 950,000 950,000 Reserve Jail Expansion 40,000 ,000 0 0 15, 000, 000 25,000,000 0 Justice Annex 7,000,000 0 0 0 0 7,000,000 Misc Projects 3,793,000 814,000 751 ,000 719,000 674 ,000 835,000 PW Projects 1 ,500 ,000 300 ,000 300,000 300,000 300 ,000 300 ,000 Southeast 4,000,000 4, 000 , 000 Weld Building TOTAL $44,075,000 $525,000 $8,975,000 $17,275,000 $8,725,000 $8,575,000 429 RESOURCE CAPACITY ***************** FUNDING SOURCES ***************** CASH FLOW ANALYSIS 430 CAPITAL EXPENDITURES FUND RESOURCE CAPACITY 2015 - 2019 YEAR PROPERTY TAX INTEREST FEES TOTAL 2015 $0 $400,000 $ 125,000 $525, 000 2016 8,250,000 600,000 125, 000 8,975,000 2017 16,500,000 650,000 125,000 17,275 ,000 2018 8,250,000 350,000 125,000 8,725,000 2019 8,250,000 200,000 125,000 8,575 , 000 431 CASH FLOW ANALYSIS BEGINNING ENDING YEAR FUND REVENUE EXPENDITURES FUND BALANCE BALANCE 2015 $ 24,400,000 $ 525,000 $ 1 , 114, 000 $ 23,811 ,000 2016 $ 23,811 ,000 $ 8,975,000 $ 1 ,051 , 000 $ 31 ,735,000 2017 $ 31 ,735,000 $ 17,275,000 $ 16,019,000 $ 32 ,991 ,000 2018 $ 32 ,991 ,000 $ 8,725,000 $ 25,974,000 $ 15,742,000 2019 $ 15,742,000 $ 8,575,000 $ 12, 135,000 $ 12 , 182,000 432 CORRECTIONAL FACILITY Existing Situation: The Centennial Complex Jail was constructed in 1978, and was remodeled three times to increase the capacity to 294 beds. In 1997, Phase I of the North Jail Complex was constructed with 160 beds and all of the core service facilities. The North Jail Complex is currently designed for a build out of 779 beds, but the site can accommodate over a 1 ,000-bed facility. Each phase would be in increments of approximately 160 - 375 beds. Jail population continues to grow in Weld County, but the growth rate has slowed the last few years due to more use of jail alternative programs. Phase II was completed and opened in January, 2004. Phase II added 245 beds based upon the design . Construction of Phase II allowed for the closure of the Centennial Jail and conversion of the space to accommodate Court needs. Phase III , which added 374 beds, was constructed in 2006 - 2007, and was opened in February 2008. Proposed Solution: It is proposed that additional phases of the North Jail Complex be constructed in increments of beds, as needed . The total project of approximately 331 , 143 square feet will be constructed in phases. The first phase, constructed in 1997, was 125,775 square feet. It included the core service facilities, such as kitchen , administrative offices, medical detention , booking area , and lobby to accommodate over 1 ,000 inmates. Phase II has 245 beds and is both maximum and medium security to accommodate the projected inmate classifications. Phase II was constructed in the 2002 - 2003 time frame and became fully operational as of 2004. Phase III has 374 beds and was constructed in 2006 - 2007. There is currently 217,568 square feet of building with 779 beds available. Financing: It is recommended that the county budget $40,000,000 in the 2015 - 2019 capital plan budget to construct an additional 113, 575 square feet of building for 350 additional beds. Nothing will be in the capital budget in 2015 for jail construction . The capital plan is consistent with the inmate population projections in the Weld County Jail Occupancy and Future Jail Needs Study completed August 19, 2013, that calls for the opening of added jail beds at the end of 2018. Impact on Operational Costs: At the end of 2018, it is anticipated that the new jail capacity will be opened . The use of the capacity will be phased in over a two to three year period , depending on inmate population growth . Based upon past phased openings of the jail , the estimated additional annual costs are: Item 2018 2019 2020 Staffing $ 1 ,210,000 $ 770,000 $ 1 , 100,000 Medical Costs 0 600,000 320,000 Food 0 400,000 200,000 Utilities 0 60,000 0 Maintenance 0 60,000 0 433 WELD COUNTY BUSINESS PARK Existing Situation: In 1987, Weld County acquired 160 acres located in the southwest corner of "O" Street and North 11th Avenue in Greeley. Funds for the property came from the sale of the Health Building . Proposed Solution: The property is large enough to allow for future consolidation of county facilities in one area . The utilities and site improvement were developed in 1988, at an estimated cost of $1 ,750, 000 with the aid of a $630, 000 EDA Grant. The first facilities, completed in 1989, included a 15,000 square foot building for Human Services and a county motor vehicle shop. Fifty to 60 acres have been developed for building and storage sites and approximately 60 acres can be mined for gravel and reclaimed in an attractive way. The new correctional facility is located on this site, as well as the Health Department, Household Hazardous Waste Building , Training Center, Motor Pool , Public Works, Law Administration , Buildings and Grounds, Alternative Programs Facility, Community Corrections Facility, and four administrative buildings. A portion of the property was made available for commercial development and offered at no cost or low cost to private parties for economic development incentives. A PUD was approved for land use purposes in 1989. Financing: Development, using future years' funds, is programmed into the long-range plan under specific projects, which include a correction facility ($40,000 ,000). Impact on Operational Costs: See individual projects for cost impacts. 434 COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM Existing Situation: Weld County, in 1975, created the Weld County Regional Communications Center and agreed to fund the infrastructure to accommodate the communications system . The system consisting of towers, radio receivers and transmitters, system controllers, consoles, computers, and various communications equipment has been required to be replaced or upgraded approximately every ten years with growth and technological changes. The costs have been paid for by grants, Weld County government, and the E911 Authority. Proposed Solution: The communications system was upgraded in 2012 at a total cost of $7, 700,000. The E911 Authority Board has agreed to fund the console equipment upgrade in the amount of $2 ,000, 000, and Weld County, in the Capital Expenditure Fund , funded the remaining costs. In addition , the Board of County Commissioners has agreed to adopt a policy of funding a $9,500,000 capital reserve in the amount of $950,000 per year, so that in ten years funds will be in the capital reserve for the next upgrade and the 700 MHz conversion . Financing: The upgrade for 2012 was funded by the E911 Authority Board funding $2 ,000,000 from its reserve, and Weld County funded $5 ,700,000 in 2012 from the Capital Expenditure Fund for the total cost of $7,700,000. Beginning in 2013, Weld County will fund $950,000 per year for the Communications System Reserve for future communications systems upgrades and the 700 MHz conversion . $2 ,200,000 was placed in the capital reserve for the mobile and portable radio replacement. Purchase of the radios is being delayed pending the FCC waiver regarding going to a different bandwidth . Without the waiver the change must take place by 2017. Impact on Operational Costs: There will be no additional operational costs for the system . Operational costs are currently funded by Weld County, City of Greeley, the E911 Authority Board , and users using in excess of $ 10,000 per year in allocated costs. It is not anticipated that the upgraded systems will be any more expensive, operationally, to maintain than the current system . 435 GRADER SHEDS / STORAGE BUILDING Existing Situation: The County currently has 18 grader sheds throughout Weld County, to accommodate road maintenance functions in all sectors of the county. The grader sheds are in various conditions, ranging from good to needing replacement. Seventeen have recently been replaced -- Nunn ( 1981 ), Gwonda ( 1982), Vim ( 1983), New Raymer ( 1984), Mead ( 1985), Rockport ( 1986), Kiowa ( 1987), Severance ( 1987), Gilcrest ( 1989), Ault ( 1989), Briggsdale ( 1991 ), Keenesburg ( 1994) Stoneham ( 1994), Dacono ( 1995), Fort Lupton (2000), Gill (2001 ), Galeton (2003), New Raymer (2004), Rockport (2007), Kersey (2010), Briggsdale (2013), and Mead (2014). In addition , four ice control storage buildings were constructed in 2001 - 2003. Additional storage facilities at the Public Works Headquarters were built in 2003 and 2013. A new Buildings and Grounds facility was built in 2007, and the old facility was converted to a Printing and Supply facility. An additional storage facility was purchased in 2009. Proposed Solution: An analysis of existing grader sheds determined which are required for the operational functions of the road maintenance operation in Weld County. In the process some have been sold , others consolidated , and some identified for replacement. In cases where existing grader sheds will accommodate the maintenance function , it is suggested that attention be given to those sheds that need maintenance or major improvements. Where necessary, replacement sheds have been identified . Financing: The county, since 1982 , has totally reconstructed and upgraded all grader and road maintenance facilities. The county should continue a sound maintenance and replacement program , so the buildings do not fall into the disrepair condition they were in prior to 1982 . The funding mechanism is a pay-as-you-go function out of the Capital Fund . In 2014, a 15,000 square foot heavy equipment storage facility will be constructed ($800,000). Funds in the amount of $300,000 per year for the years 2015-2019 are included for Public Works facilities. The grader sheds will be replaced in Kiowa (2015), Johnstown (2016), Nunn (2017), and Severance (2019). Impact on Operational Costs: Vehicle storage facility will have utility costs of approximately $2 ,400 per year. Since the old grader sheds are being replaced with new sheds, the county's experience is that there is approximately a $ 1 ,000 per year savings on the utilities due to the use of radiant heat and improved insulation . Staffing is unchanged . 436 JUSTICE CENTER Existing Situation: The Justice Center includes the Courthouse, Court Annexes, and Centennial Center buildings. It provides for the space needs of the 19th Judicial District. Under state law the county is obligated to provide and maintain the facilities for court related activities. The Courthouse was built in 1917 and is maintained on the Federal Register of Historical Buildings. After many remodels and upgrades it still functions as the main court facility for Weld County. In the mid- 1980's two buildings across the street from the Courthouse were acquired and remodeled to house the Probation Department. In 2001 , the West Courthouse Annex Building was acquired to house the District Attorney Juvenile Division . As the population grows and court related activities grow the space requirements continue to expand . Four courtrooms were added in 2008. Proposed Solution: With the growing needs of the courts it will require that the county convert the Centennial Center, including the jail , to courtrooms and court-related offices. With the construction of Phase II of the North Jail , the Centennial Jail was closed and remodeled into court-related space in 2004. All Sheriff's office administrative functions, along with Communications and Records, were moved to the new Public Safety Administrative Building next to the North Jail in 2003. Over time the entire Centennial Complex will become court-related space, as well as the two annex buildings to the west and east of the Courthouse. In 2004, three additional district courtrooms were created , a juvenile courtroom , and one additional county courtroom , and in 2009 four additional court rooms were built. The first floor of the Centennial Jail has been converted into courtrooms. The second and third floors of the jail were remodeled in 2010 for additional court and office facilities. First floor Centennial offices were converted into office space for the Clerk to the Court. The space in the Courthouse occupied by the Clerk to the Court was converted into a district courtroom . These courtrooms will supplement the current vacant district courtroom and the visiting judge courtroom to accommodate four anticipated additional judges through 2020. Space formerly occupied by the Weld County Commissioners and administrative functions will be converted to court-related space since those functions moved to a new administrative building in 2011 . Financing: The County can accommodate court related activities in the space of the Justice Center for several years. In addition , the block to the southeast of the Centennial Complex has been acquired by the county and converted into a parking lot. In the future when the need arises, that block can serve as a site for court building expansion and a parking garage structure to accommodate court space needs. Also, in the next decade it may be necessary to have court facilities in the southern part of Weld County where the population is growing at a rapid rate. The funding mechanism for all court facility needs should be a pay-as-you-go function out of the Capital Fund . The following page is a schedule of proposed conversion of Justice Center space. 437 CAPITAL PLAN FOR JUSTICE CENTER YEAR CURRENT USE NEW USE COST 2008 Vacant Work Release (30,000 sf) $ 4,275,000 2008 Second Floor Old Jail 2 Courtrooms $ 1 ,500,000 2008 Third Floor Work Release 2 Courtrooms $ 1 ,500 ,000 2008 Third Floor Work Release DA Offices $ 1 ,000 ,000 2011 Vacant Administrative Bldg . $ 5,000,000 2014 Planning Probation $ 100,000 2020+ Third Floor Centennial 2 Courtrooms $ 1 ,200,000 2020+ First Floor Centennial 1 Courtroom $ 300,000 2020+ Vacant Justice Center Annex Building $ 5,000,000 2020+ Third Floor Centennial (DA) 2 Courtrooms $ 750,000 2020+ Second Floor Centennial 2 Courtrooms $ 750,000 2020+ First Floor Centennial (DA) Court Offices $ 200,000 Impact on Operational Costs: Under Colorado law, county governments are required to provide space for the courts and maintenance of the facility, but all personnel and other operating expenses are paid for by the State of Colorado. The estimated additional building maintenance costs by year are: 2013 $ 0 2014 0 2015 0 2016 0 2017 0 2020+ $ 176, 000 438 ALTERNATIVE PROGRAMS BUILDING Existing Situation: Alternative programs are currently housed in the old jail and in the West Courthouse Annex. As jail crowding becomes more and more of a problem , the alternative programs, such as work release and pre-trial programs, are used more and more by the Court. The programs currently occupy approximately 20,000 square feet. The space that the programs occupy is needed for courtrooms and Probation office space. Proposed Solution: To accommodate the space needs of the alternative programs and allow for growth in the programs, a 30,000 square foot building is proposed . The facility will be constructed in the Weld County Business Park. This puts the facility in closer proximity to the jail for support services. Financing: The new 30,000 square foot Alternative Programs Building was completed in 2008. Impact on Operational Costs: Impact of additional costs on the 2008 budget was $ 156,300 for utilities and maintenance. Staffing costs were unchanged , since personnel were transferred from the old facility to the new building . 439 LAW ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION BUILDING Existing Situation: Growing needs of the courts require that the county convert the Centennial Center, including the jail , to courtrooms and court-related offices. With the construction of Phase II of the North Jail , the Centennial Jail will be closed and remodeled into court-related space. In addition , all Sheriff's office administrative functions, along with the Communications and Records, were relocated in 2004 to accommodate the courts. Proposed Solution: Since the entire jail operation was moved to the North Jail there are logistical advantages to relocate all Sheriff Office functions near the jail site. To accommodate the space needs of the Sheriff's Office, a 22, 000 square foot office building near the North Jail site was constructed in 2002 . The building houses the Sheriffs office functions, Communications, and Records. This allows for the consolidation of all criminal justice functions at one site with the exception of patrol substations. Financing: The new Public Safety Administration Building was constructed in 2002 . Funds in the amount of $2,500,000 were budgeted in 2002 for the construction of a 22 ,000 square foot office building . In 2010 and 2014 respectively, the Records Unit and the Weld County Regional Communications Center were moved from the Law Enforcement Administration Building to the former Human Services Building to free up space for the Sheriff's Office. Impact on Operational Costs: There was no impact of additional costs on the 2010 or 2014 budget for utilities and maintenance, since the space has been maintained in the past. Staffing costs were unchanged , since personnel were transferred from the old facility to the new building . 440 REGIONAL CRIME LAB Existing Situation: Currently the county has a crime lab located in the basement of the Centennial Complex, and the former Planning Department office. The space is inadequate to meet the size and program requirements. Weld County is taking the lead to create a regional crime lab for Northern Colorado that would house approximately 40 crime lab staff members from various law enforcement agencies and CBI . Proposed Solution: The proposed regional crime lab facility will consist of approximately 20,000 square feet. It will contain private and open office areas, waiting areas, lobby space, meeting/conference rooms, complete laboratory and forensics discovery area . It will be fully fire sprinkled . The crime lab's location is in a business park off Highway 34 and WCR 17, which is a central location for the Northern Colorado region . Financing: The construction of the regional crime lab started in 2012 financed by $4, 000,000 in county funds. It was completed and fully operational in August, 2013. Impact on Operational Costs: Once the crime lab is constructed there will be additional costs in the budget for utilities and maintenance, in the amount of $240,000. However, five participating agencies will pay approximately 80% of this cost, or $192 ,000 for a net county cost of $48,000. Staffing costs are unchanged , since personnel will be transferred from the old crime lab to the new building . A Federal grant for $500,000 will fund the first two to three years of operational costs. 441 COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS FACILITY Existing Situation: The Community Corrections program has been operated by private contractors since its inception in Weld County in the early 1980's. The facility that the contractors have used is the site known as The Villa, which were old dormitories on the UNC campus. UNC has encouraged the Community Corrections Facility to move off campus due to the facility housing convicted felons that are returning to the community from the Colorado Department of Corrections. Recently, there have been problems with the contractor that owns the facility providing the community correction services. The county realizes that without a county-owned community corrections facility it limits the county's choices for a contract provider of the service and the option of the county operating the facility itself through the Justice Services Department. Proposed Solution: The Board of Weld County Commissioners, in May 2008, made the decision that the county should construct its own Community Corrections Facility in the Weld County Business Park. The site will be at the entrance of the park at the northwest corner of 11th Avenue and H Street. A 30,000 square-foot building was constructed in 2010 to accommodate the program . The site can accommodate a doubling of the facility size at some future date at a cost of approximately $5,000, 000. Financing: The new Community Corrections Facility was constructed , in 2010, within the Weld County Business Park. An Energy Impact Grant, in the amount of $400, 000, along with $4,600,000 in county funds, funded the project. Impact on Operational Costs: There were additional costs in the 2010 and future budgets for utilities and maintenance, in the amount of $ 160, 000. However, the majority of the program costs are paid for from state contracts with the State Department of Corrections through a lease to ICCS, which is the sub- contractor operating the facility. Currently, the program services are provided by a private contractor (ICCS). 442 DOWNTOWN GREELEY PARKING AND LAND Existing Situation: The Courthouse and Centennial Center are located in the center of downtown Greeley. The future plans are for these facilities to be the judicial center for the 19th Judicial District that serves Weld County. Parking has been a long time problem in the area for citizens using the facilities. In addition , as Weld County looks to the future there will be a need to have land to locate future court facilities. The court administration is insistent upon having a centralized location , since other jurisdictions have had logistical problems attempting to split court facilities into more than one location . As a result, there is a need to acquire land adjacent to the current location to accommodate future court facilities. Proposed Solution: In July, 2003, the County purchased a portion of an adjacent block of property to the Centennial Complex and Courthouse to allow for surface parking in the immediate future, and to provide future building sites for future court facilities. Opportunity existed to purchase approximately 100,000 square feet adjacent to the current facilities in 2003. The parking was developed in 2004, and needed facilities can be constructed on this site in the future. Financing: In 2003, fund balance from the General Fund , in the amount of $ 1 ,500,000, was transferred to the Capital Expenditure Fund to acquire the site and put money aside for the parking improvements in 2004. Approximately 250 parking spots have been developed to serve the area . As portions of the site are needed for court building sites, a parking structure can be built to accommodate added parking needs or land to the east or south of the site can be acquired for surface parking . In the 2012 budget $2 ,000,000 was reserved for the purchase of property adjacent to the current Justice Center location to accommodate future court facilities and support services. In 2014 $600,000 was used for property acquisitions leaving $1 ,400,000 reserved for future property purchases in the area of the Courthouse. Impact on Operational Costs: No new operation costs are anticipated . 443 ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE BUILDING Existing Situation: The long term plan with the development of the Weld County Business Park was for the eventual move of all administrative functions of the county to the business park. All of the functions were housed at the Centennial Complex in 1976. In 1990-91 the Assessor, Treasurer, Clerk and Recorder, and Planning were relocated to the business park. With the future space demands of the courts it is anticipated that the remaining county administrative functions at the Centennial Complex will need to be relocated to the Weld County Business Park within the next year. This will leave the Centennial Complex as a justice and law enforcement center exclusively. Proposed Solution: In order to accommodate the Court's space needs and the County's administrative functions it was necessary to acquire a new administrative facility at the Weld County Business Park. To accommodate the space needs of the existing administrative functions, and plan for future growth , an existing 43, 000 square-foot office building was purchased in 2010, and remodeled to accommodate current and future County administrative functional needs. Financing: The County purchased the existing Sykes Building for $3,500 , 000 in June, 2010. Approximately another $2, 300, 000 was spent to remodel the building to make a fully functional administrative building to house the County Commissioners' Office and associated administrative functions. Vacant space will exist to accommodate growth for a number of years. The project was funded by Capital Reserve funds. Impact on Operational Costs: There were additional costs in the 2011 budget for utilities and maintenance, in the amount of $ 180,000. There were no additional staffing costs since the staff moved from other facilities to occupy this building . Moving and relocation costs were $50, 000. 444 SOCIAL SERVICES BUILDING ANNEX Existing Situation: The Social Services Building was acquired in the 1970's and in the mid 1990's an annex was added . In 2005, additional land was purchased , adjacent to and south of the two existing buildings. The additional land will accommodate another 20,000 square foot building and parking . Proposed Solution: A new 40,000 square foot building was constructed in Greeley on the Social Services site in 2009. The building will accommodate the current services, plus allow room for future expansion and consolidation of the Human Services and Social Services Departments. Financing: The building was constructed in 2009. Funds in the amount of $5,000,000 were budgeted in the 2008 budget for the 40,000 square foot building . Additional parking was constructed in 2007, in the amount of $300, 000. Impact on Operational Costs: There were additional costs in the 2010 budget and beyond for utilities and maintenance, in the amount of $210,000. However, the majority of the program costs are paid for from grants from the State Department of Social Services. There were no additional staffing costs since the staff moved from other facilities to occupy this building . 445 SOUTHWEST COUNTY SERVICE CENTER Existing Situation: The Southwest County Service Center was developed in 2000 - 2001 . With the growth in the area, additional facilities will be required to house all the County functions required to service the area . Proposed Solution: It is proposed that an additional 20,000 square foot building be constructed on the Southwest Weld County Service Center site in the future. The building will accommodate the current services, plus allow room for future expansion of services in the area . Financing: The building will be constructed in 2020, or beyond . Funds in the amount of $4,000,000 are budgeted in the 2020 budget or beyond for the 20, 000 square foot building . Impact on Operational Costs: There will be additional costs in the budget for utilities and maintenance, in the amount of $ 120,000 when the facility is built. There will be no additional staffing costs since the staff will be moving from other facilities to occupy this building . Moving and relocation costs are estimated to be $30,000. 446 SOUTHEAST COUNTY SERVICE CENTER Existing Situation: The Southeast County Service Center was acquired as a used building in the early 1980's from the City of Fort Lupton . With the growth in the area , the building was no longer large enough for the functions located in the building , and the building was in need of remodeling . Proposed Solution: In 2006, a new 20,000 square foot building was constructed in east Fort Lupton on a five-acre site. The building accommodates the historic services provided , plus Probation and increased Human Services. The location of the building in east Fort Lupton will better accommodate not only Fort Lupton residents, but also residents from the Hudson and Lochbuie areas. Additional space may be added to the site in 2019, or beyond . Financing: The additional building will be constructed in 2019, or beyond . Funds in the amount of $4,000, 000 are budgeted in the 2019 budget or beyond for the 20,000 square foot building . Impact on Operational Costs: There will be additional costs in the budget for utilities and maintenance, in the amount of $ 120,000 when the facility is built. There will be no additional staffing costs since the staff will be moving from other facilities to occupy this building . Moving and relocation costs are estimated to be $30 ,000. 447 MISCELLANEOUS PROJECTS Existing Situation: Each year there are several special projects to do major maintenance to buildings, update or renovate county facilities, provide for new county programs, and remodel to accommodate changing programs or meet new legal standards. An approach which provides miscellaneous funds of this nature can prevent postponing necessary major maintenance or remodeling of facilities and , thus, avoid added cost or delay of potential savings to the county and taxpayers. In addition , such an approach can also make better utilization of existing facilities in order to avoid the acquisition of new space and facilities. Carpet replacement, HVAC replacement, roof replacement, elevator upgrades, remodels, and major maintenance projects should be included in this category. Proposed Solution: It is recommended that an amount of $3,793,000 be set aside for such projects in the Long Range Capital Projects Plan . A detailed listing of special projects is on the following two pages. Financing: It is recommended the county budget $3,793,000 over the next five years to accommodate the detailed listing of special projects found on the following two pages. Impact on Operational Costs: No new operational costs are anticipated . In most cases the HVAC systems replaced should be more energy efficient resulting in energy cost savings. 448 B&G Capital Maintenance Projects 2015 - 2019 FY 2015 Building Name Address Type of Improvement Budget Estimate 1551 Roof 1551 N. 17th Ave, Greeley Top Unit (RTU) ) $95,000 Public Works 1111 H Street, Greeley Carpet $98,000 Public Works 1111 H Street, Greeley Carpet $50,000 1551 1551 N. 17th Ave, Greeley Boiler $25,000 Jail New $300,000 2110 "O" Street, Greeley Roof (Center Section) Jail Fountain Replacement $30,000 2110 "O" Street, Greeley (B,C,O,N,M Pods) Motor Pool 1399 N. 17th Ave., Greeley Flourescent Light Upgrade $30,000 Centennial 915 10th Street, Greeley Domestic Water Pump $30,000 Centennial Remove Obsolete Mech Equipment $30,000 915 10th Street, Greeley Jail 2110 "O" Street, Greeley Domestic Water Pump $35,000 Alternative Programs Shower Replacement (40) 1390 N. 17th Ave, Greeley p $35,000 Fuel Site Fuel Dispenser Replacements 1113 H Street, Greeley p p $56,000 Total $814,000 FY 2016 Building Name Address Type of Improvement Budget Estimate Jail 2110 O-Street Greeley 1-West Water Storage Tanks $150,000 1551 1551 N. 17th Ave, Greeley Sprinkler system control wires & clocks $15,000 Alternative Programs Clothes Washers 1 1399 N. 17th Ave., Greeley ( ) $16,000 Alternative Programs Clothes Dryers 1399 N. 17th Ave., Greeley (2) $18,000 Hazardous Waste (North) 1311 N.17th Ave, Greeley Roof $46,000 Jail 2110 "O" Street, Greeley 1-West Roof $300,000 Print Shop 1500 2nd Street, Greeley Roof (sloped portion) $66,000 Jail 2110 "O" Street, Greeley 1-West Boiler/Tanks $140,000 Total $751,000 FY 2017 Building Name Address Type of Improvement Budget Estimate Planning & Health 1555 N. 17th Ave., Greeley Chiller $526,000 Jail 2110 "O" Street, Greeley Kitchen Refrigerator/Equipment $78,000 Jail 2110 "O" Street, Greeley Two Food Warmers $17,000 Jail Clothes Washers 3 2110 "O" Street, Greeley ( ) $50,000 Jail 2110 "O" Street, Greeley Sprinkler system control wires & clocks $20,000 Jail Clothes Dryers 2 2110 "O" Street, Greeley (3) $ 8,000 Total $719,000 449 FY 2018 Building Name Address Type of Improvement Budget Estimate Ambulance (North) 1121 M Street, Greeley Carpet $23,000 Ambulance (North) 1121 M Street, Greeley Light Upgrade $11 ,000 Centennial Heating/Domestic Valves 915 10th Street, Greeley g $80,000 Centennial 915 10th Street, Greeley Chiller Pumps $30,000 Centennial 915 10th Street, Greeley Isolation Valves $30,000 Centennial Courts Holding Parking Lights 915 10th Street, Greeley $10,000 Jail Roof 2110 "O" Street, Greeley (1-East Roof) $336,000 Public Health 1555 N. 17th Ave, Greeley Fire Alarm Controls $34,000 Courthouse Annex 934 9th Ave, Greeley Roof $120,000 Total $674,000 FY 2019 Building Name Address Type of Improvement Budget Estimate Centennial 915 10th Street, Greeley Plaza West Roof $360,000 Centennial 915 10th Street, Greeley Centennial/Plaza East Roof $475,000 Total $835,000 450 ACCUMULATIVE CAPITAL OUTLAY/CONTINGENCY Existing Situation: If Weld County is to embark upon a number of ventures in capital projects over the next five years, it is suggested the county proceed very cautiously and very conservatively in the area of financing . To do this, it is suggested that a contingency be set aside each year on a pay as you go basis to accommodate unanticipated cost increases or emergency situations which cannot be foreseen at this time. If the contingency amount is accumulated over the next five years, it can be used as a reserve for the capital projects program in future years, or it can be used as a funding mechanism in years beyond 2020. The primary reserve would be for a future correctional facility or other facilities at the North County Complex and southwest and southeast County administrative office sites and to fund the replacement of the Communications system . Proposed Solution: Budget any carry-over amount each year on a contingency basis that ultimately could be used to meet any contingency or emergency situation , or could be used as an accumulation of capital outlay funds for funding of projects beyond 2020. Financing: It is recommended that the county budget fund balance carry-overs in the capital fund each year as a contingency. Impact on Operational Costs: None. 451 MISCELLANEOUS FUNDS 452 AIRPORT Existing Situation: The Weld County Board of County Commissioners, with approval of the Airport Master Plan , committed to participate in certain enhancements at the Airport facility, especially those enhancements that will ensure the safety of airport operations. If the Board decides to continue to participate in the joint funding of the Greeley/Weld County Airport Authority with the City of Greeley, funds should be provided for in the Long Range Capital Projects Plan to accommodate the FAA ADAP program during the next five years. Funds can also be made available to maintain FAA constructed facilities. Proposed Solution: In the Long Range Capital Projects Plan for 2015, funds are included to accommodate capital improvements at the Greeley/Weld County Airport. If funding is provided , it should be for projects that emphasize safety features and other essential enhancements to the current operation . Financing: Funding , in the amount of $0.00 is required in the Airport's 2015 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Impact on Operational Costs: Although the Airport Authority may incur additional operational costs from the projects in the Airport CIP, no new operational costs are anticipated as a result of the Airport CIP for Weld County government. 453 SIX YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) WORKSHEET Airport Name Greeley-Weld County Airport (GXY) CIP Update 11 - 17-09 Airport Manager Mike Reisman Airport Engineer/ Consultant: RS&H Airport Sponsor Greeley-Weld County Airport Authority ADO Contact: Don O'Brien Address P.O . Box 727 Greeley, CO 80632 reisman@gxy.net Phone (970) 336-3000 FAX: (970) 336-3030 Project Description FAA State Apport. Fed. Discrec. GA Entitlement State Local Total Comments Historical Year 2010 Apron Rehab Preliminary Design and Construction Phase I 150,000.00 3, 947.00 3,947.00 157, 894.00 Total Year 2010 - - 150,000.00 3, 947.00 3,947.00 157, 894.00 Year 2011 Taxilane Rehab 600,000.00 15, 789. 00 15,789. 00 631 , 578.00 Uses Buena Vista , Erie & Holyoke GA Ent. Equipment Storage Building 234,211 .00 635,000. 00 869,211 . 00 Additional local funds to be provided above match Total Year 2011 600,000.00 250,000.00 650,789.00 1 ,500,789.00 Year 2012 GA Ent. - Transfer to Buena Vista Multi-Use Tractor System 120, 000.00 30,000. 00 150, 000.00 Total Year 2012 - - 0 . 00 120, 000. 00 30,000. 00 150, 000. 00 Year 2013 GA Entitlement - Transfer to Erie Pavement Fog Seal 250, 000. 00 62 ,500. 00 312, 500. 00 • Total Year 2013 - - - 250, 000.00 62, 500. 00 312, 500.00 Year 2014 GA Entitlement - Transfer to Holyoke Total - Year 2014 - - - - -Year 2015 Pavement Fog Seal 150,000.00 3,947.00 3,947.00 157,894.00 Total - Year 2015 150,000.00 3,947.00 3, 947. 00 157, 894. 00 Year 2016 GA Ent.TBD 150, 000. 00 3,947.00 3,947. 00 157, 894.00 Runway 16/34 and Twy C Overlay 7,476, 500 . 00 196, 750. 00 196, 750 . 00 7, 870, 000. 00 Total - Year 2016 - 7,476, 500. 00 150,000.00 200.697.00 200,697. 00 8, 027,894. 00 Total 6-Year CIP - 7,476, 500. 00 1 , 050, 000. 00 828, 591 .00 951 , 880. 00 10,306, 971 . 00 NPIAS projects for long-term completion - by priority T/way B and E 5,400,000.00 Taxilane Re-hab - Future Phase 600. 000. 00 454 CONSERVATION TRUST FUND Existing Situation: With the passage of SB119 (The Colorado Lottery), 40 percent of the proceeds of the lottery are earmarked for Conservation Trust Funds in local governments. The earning potential of the lottery is anticipated to be $376, 000 per year. The funds must be used for "the acquisition , development, and maintenance of new conservation sites, or for capital improvements or maintenance for recreational purposes on any public site". (Section 29-21 - 101 , C. R.S . ) With the passage of Amendment 8 (GO COLORADO) these funds should stabilize at $450,000 per year, plus lottery sales growth . See Conservation Trust Fund for detailed discussion . Proposed Solution : The Board has the option to use the funds in the following ways: 1 . Maintain and improve Island Grove Park. 2. Maintain and improve the Missile Site Park. 3. Acquire and maintain open space. 4. Develop and maintain trails. 5. Other project requests from throughout the county. Financing : In addition to Conservation Trust Funds, it is recommended that the county finance parks and recreation projects at a level of $29,000 in the General Fund from property taxes. Funds from 2015 forward are uncommitted . Impact on Operational Costs: No new operational costs are anticipated . 455 ISLAND GROVE Existing Situation: Weld County and the City of Greeley currently have certain joint ventures and commitments to develop the Island Grove Park facility. Some discussion has been held regarding the creation of an Island Grove Park Authority for development and management of the facility. Proposed Solution: If the Board of County Commissioners decides to continue participation in the development of the Island Grove facility, it is recommended that Conservation Trust Funds from the lottery be used to the maximum amount prior to use of county general tax funds. Financing: It is recommended that the county finance any Island Grove enhancements with Conservation Trust Funds resulting from the lottery, to the maximum amount possible, prior to use of general county tax funds. Beginning in 2003, $100, 000 per year in General Fund dollars has been committed to the maintenance of an indoor arena facility. Also, in 2000, the County contributed $ 1 ,500,000 towards the construction of the indoor arena facility, known as the Island Grove Community Building . The facility was constructed and will be maintained jointly by the City of Greeley, Farm Show, and Weld County. $250, 000 was included in the 2004 General Fund budget to add air conditioning to the Island Grove Community Building . The county paid $ 1 ,500,000, in 2006, for the Island Grove Park Master Plan that covers improvements to the park for the next 10 - 20 year period . Impact on Operational Costs: Although the Island Grove Park Authority may incur additional operational costs from the projects in the park's CIP, no new operational costs are anticipated as a result of the park's CIP for Weld County government. In most cases, the new park facilities planned will generate revenues to support the additional operating costs. 456 PROPRIETARY FUNDS SUMMARY Proprietary funds include both Internal Service Funds and Enterprise Funds. Internal Service Funds are established to account for goods and services provided to other departments of the county on a cost-reimbursement basis. Enterprise Funds account for departments providing services primarily to third party payers. With the transfer of the Paramedic Service to the local hospital in 2012 Weld County will no longer have an Enterprise Fund in its budget. MOTOR VEHICLE FUND: The Motor Vehicle Fund accounts for the revenue and costs generated by equipment and vehicles rented to other county departments. The gross operating budget amounts to $9, 109, 543 in 2015, with $3,549,500 budgeted for new capital equipment. The budget reflects the continuation of the contract fleet management approach adopted by the Board in August, 1984. Depreciation is $3,400,000 for new equipment purchases, plus sale of surplus items of $603,500. Grants in the amount of $ 1 , 019,745 for CNG vehicles and conversions are included in the 2015 budget. HEALTH INSURANCE FUND: The Health Insurance Fund reflects the cost of Weld County's self-insurance program which includes health , dental , and vision coverage. Details of the program and coverage are found under the specifics of the fund summary. In 2015, the county will continue with only dental and vision being self-insured . Health coverage will be provided by a private company on a partially self-insured basis with a Preferred Provider Organization (PPO) option and a High Deductible Health Plan/Health Reimbursement Account (HDHP/HRA) option . INSURANCE FUND: The Insurance Fund accounts for all insurance costs for the county. The program is a combination of insured risks and protected self-insurance risks. Gross budget costs are $2, 160,000 in 2015, with a property tax levy of $2,000,000. Details of the program are provided under the specifics of the fund summary. PHONE SERVICE FUND: Budget reflects total consolidation of phone service costs of $ 1 ,662,749 in Weld County. Funding is at current level and reflects capital upgrades of $250, 000. WELD COUNTY FINANCE CORPORATION: Budget contains the funding for the Weld County Finance Corporation , which accounts for the lease purchases of county buildings. As of August 1 , 2007, there are no active leases. Weld County has no long-term debt. 457 MOTOR POOL SUMMARY OF REVENUES 2015 2014 2015 2015 2015 Fund Ord Acct Account Title Budget Request Recommend Final GRANTS 6000 17550 4340 GRANTS 1 ,133,829 803,655 803,655 803,655 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 6000 96300 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 5,690,000 5,709,543 5,709,543 5,709,543 MISCELLANEOUS 6000 96300 4680 OTHER 3, 130,000 3,400.000 3,400,000 3,400;000 6000 17550 4810 GAIN LOSS ON SALE 460,000 603,500 603,500 603,500 TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS 3,590,000 4,003,500 4,003,500 4,003,500 TOTAL MOTOR POOL 10,413,829 10,516,698 10,516,698 10,516,698 458 MOTOR POOL SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2015 2014 2015 2015 2015 Fund Org Expenditure Function Budget Request Recommend Final 6000 17550 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT 4,458,500 3,549,500 3,549,500 3,481 ,000 6000 96300 COUNTY SHOP 8,820,000 9, 109,543 9, 109,543 9, 109,543 TOTAL MOTOR POOL 13,278,500 12,659,043 12,659,043 12,590,543 459 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: IS - MOTOR POOL BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Motor Pool Administration - - 6000-96300 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Centralized motor pool support for Weld County. Contract for fleet maintenance is included in this budget unit. RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 2,496,603 2,521 ,000 2 ,521 ,000 2,521 ,000 Purchased Services 4, 152 , 009 3,036,000 3,036, 000 3,036,000 Fixed Charges 3,582,687 3,240,000 3,527 , 543 3,527,543 Capital 34,032 23,000 25,000 25 ,000 Gross County Cost $ 10,265,331 $ 8,820,000 $ 9, 109,543 $ 9, 109,543 Revenue 9,777,886 8 ,820,000 9, 109,543 9, 109,543 Net County Cost $ 487,445 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budgeted Positions n/a n/a n/a n/a SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Supplies and Purchased Services are unchanged . Fixed costs are up $287, 543 for increase depreciation with increase in fleet equipment of $270,000, and overhead is up $17, 543. Capital is up $2 ,000 for shop equipment. Total expenses are $9, 109, 543. Revenue includes $5,709,543 for maintenance charges, $3,400,000 for recovery of depreciation for a total of $9, 109,543. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . 460 MOTOR POOL ADMINISTRATION (CONTINUED) 6000-96300 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Number of work orders issued 6,356 6,400 6,450 Number of service/maintenance orders per technician 800 800 800 Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita .480 .472 .459 Work orders issued per FTE 488 492 496 Goal ES19: To provide quality, sufficient, and well-maintained county vehicles to county departments. DESIRED PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES OBJECTIVE/KEY ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ES 19-1 : Safe and 90% of department users satisfied with reliable vehicles the quality and timeliness of fleet 90% 90% 90% ready to meet needs management services ES 19-2: Worker- 90% of internal customers satisfied friendly and with county vehicle 90% 90% 90% functional vehicles ES 19-3: Cost Cost (acquisition, operating, resale effective vehicles value) within prescribed industry 95% 95% 95% standards ES 19-4: Fuel- 90% of internal customers satisfied efficient/ with county vehicle 90% 90% 90% environmentally- friendly vehicles 461 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: IS - MOTOR POOL BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Motor Pool Equipment - - 6000-17550 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Use of funded depreciation to acquire vehicles for county use. RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Capital 5,753,413 4,458, 500 3,549,500 3,549, 500 Gross County Cost $ 5,753,413 $ 4,458,500 $ 3,549,500 $ 3,549,500 Revenue 83,500 1 ,593,829 1 ,407, 155 1 ,407, 155 Net County Cost $ 5,669,913 $ 2,864,671 $ 2, 142,345 $ 2 , 142 ,345 Budgeted Positions n/a n/a n/a n/a SUMMARY OF CHANGES: See listed equipment on next page. Thirteen vehicles have been identified for CNG/LGN , 82.79% will be covered with CMAQ grants. CMAQ grant match is $216, 090 for $ 1 , 019,745 in CNG vehicles. Revenue includes $603, 500 from gains on the sale of equipment and $803,655 from CMAQ grant funding for CNG vehicles. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . 462 IGA EQUIPMENT Request Recommend Approved Sheriff: Patrol Vehicles 10 $ 265,000 $ 265,000 $ 265,000 Investigation/Civil/Admin 4 84,000 84,000 84,000 3/4 Ton ext Cab 4x4 long bed * 1 45,000 45,000 45,000 Inmate Transport Vehicle 1 80,000 80,000 80,000 Buildings & Grounds 1 /2 ton ext cab pickup (addition) 1 hold from 2014 aution Missile Park Tractor W PTO/3-point hitch 1 trf replacement from Weed District Attorney Full Size Sedan 1 26,500 26,500 0 Planning/Building Inspection 1 /2 ton ext cab 4X4 * ( 1 addition ) 2 72,000 72,000 72,000 Environmental Health Forklift (addition) 1 trf replacement from Public Works Engineering 1 /2 ton long box pickup (2 additions) * 3 114,000 114,000 114,000 Weed Farm Tractor 60,000 60,000 60,000 Public Works See Basic List 2,803,000 2,803,000 2,761 ,000 Total $3,549,500 $3,549,500 $3,481 ,000 * Identifed as CNG 463 2015 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FOR PUBLIC WORKS DEPT Division Description Estimated Est. (Shaded items reflect outgoing equip) Price Per Auction Addition Qty Unit Value To Fleet Trucking 2 Tandem Axle Belly Dump Trailers 76,000 15610021/1994 Ranco Trailer 17,000 15610022/1994 Ranco Trailer 17.000 Grader 2 Motor Graders 464,000 15820142/Volvo Motor Grader 65.000 15820122/2006 JD Motor Grader 65,000 2 Tandem tank trailers w/water spray system 140,000 15650007/2002 Polar Water Trailer 20,000 15650008/2002 Polar Water Trailer 20,000 1 Road Stabilizer/Recycler 650,000 15860006/2005 Road Reclaimer 150.000 2 3/4 Ton CNG Truck * 90,000 15220143/2007 1/2 Ton Ford 150 Truck 2,500 15220153/2008 1/2 Ton Truck w/Ext Cab 2,500 Bridge 1 1-Ton Dually, CNG 4X4 Ext Cab w/Flatbed * 60,000 15420066/1995 GMC or 15420048 20,000 1 Multi purpose Tanden axle truck 180,000 15450017/1992 Single Axle Dump Box 15,000 3 DBL Axle Trailers 30,000 15630010/1996 Tandem Axle Trailer 2,000 15630011/1999 Tandem Axle Trailer 2,000 1 Welding generator 13,000 16830022/2001 Welder 5,000 1 Hydro/vac excavator 70,000 Yes 1 Rapid View Portable Camera 65,000 Yes 1 1/2 Ton CNG Truck, long box * 38,000 15220160/2009 1/2 Ton Truck 2,500 1 Tandem Dump Truck * rr-- 210,000 15460026/2001 Tandem Dump Truck 20,000 Maint-Supt 1 Articulating wheel loader with forks 120.000 16620008/2000 Lift King Forklift a 18,000 1 3/4 Ton CNG Truck * 45,000 15220150/2007 1/2 Ton Truck 2,500 Mining 1 3/4 Ton CNG Truck * 45,000 15220120/2005 1/2 Ton Truck 2,500 1 3/4 Ton CNG Truck * 45,000 Yes Pvmt Mgmt 1 3/4 Ton CNG Crew Cab Truck, long box * 45,000 15220115/2004 1/2 Ton Truck 2,500 1 Tandem Dump Truck * 210,000 15460028/2001 Tandem Dump Truck 20,000 1 Tanden axle bituminous transport tank trailer 80,000 yes 1 Broom Sweeper 60,000 16440006/2007 Johnston Street Sweeper 40,000 1 New attachment for Skid Loader (Asphalt Planer, 24") 25,000 Yes Admin No Equipment Needed Sub-Total 2,761 ,000 511 ,000 * CNG Vehicles GRAND TOTAL PRICE LESS ESTIMATED TRADE 2000 FUND 2,250,000 464 HEALTH INSURANCE SUMMARY OF REVENUES 2015 2014 2015 2015 2015 Fund Orq Acct Account Title Budget Request Recommend Final MISCELLANEOUS 6200 93100 46902 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTIONS 17,914,044 17,914,044 17,914,044 17,914,044 TOTAL HEALTH INSURANCE 17,914,044 17,914,044 17,914,044 17,914,044 465 HEALTH INSURANCE SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2015 2014 2015 2015 2015 Fund Org Expenditure Function Budget Request Recommend Final 6200 93100 HEALTH INSURANCE 16,791 ,644 16,746,044 16,746,044 16,746,044 6200 93400 DENTAL/VISION 1 , 122,400 1 , 168,000 1 , 168,000 1 , 168,000 TOTAL HEALTH INSURANCE 17,914,044 17,914,044 17,914,044 17,914,044 466 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: IS - HEALTH INSURANCE BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Health Insurance Fund - - 6200-93100/93400 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Provides for the costs associated with Weld County's self- insured health program . RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Purchased Services 1 ,341 ,037 877,400 923,000 923, 000 Fixed Charges 11 ,672,019 17,036,644 16,991 , 044 16, 991 , 044 Gross County Cost $ 13,013,056 $ 17,914,044 $ 17,914,044 $ 17,914,044 Revenue 15,080,595 17,914,044 17,914,044 17,914,044 Net County Cost $ - 2,067,539 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The budget reflects the cost of self-insuring the dental and vision reimbursement plan ($245,000), Wellness Program ($ 185,000), and the on-site county clinic ($738,000). In addition , the budget, in 2005, started to include the partially self-insured health program offered county employees through CIGNA. The partially self-insured health program is funded at the level of $ 16,746,044 in 2015. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . For the first time in a number of years the 2015 budget anticipates NO increase in insurance rates, which takes into account the cost increase of medical care and the anticipated impact on insurance costs from the health reform legislation . Weld County will utilize CIGNA, with a hybrid universal health PPO/HMO plan as the health insurance provider in 2015, plus offer a high deductible health plan with a health reimbursement account option through CIGNA. In 2005, the county moved its health insurance plan to a consumer driven plan that combines a high deductible PPO insurance policy along with an HMO component for preventative care, with a low co-pay and low cost prescriptive drug program . The high deductible policy protects the insured from catastrophic losses, such as prolonged illness, hospitalization or simply an unexpected period of poor health . The plan is a partially self-insured program with stop loss insurance. The goal is to make the employees aware of the true cost of health care, with a program that will encourage employees and their families to make more judicious spending decisions in return for paying lower insurance premiums and lower health care costs. The health plan is being offered through CIGNA. In 2008, the County moved to a universal health care option that has lower employee premiums and higher co-insurance and out-of-pocket costs. A comprehensive wellness program was also implemented in 2008. In July, 2010, the County opened its own health clinic in an attempt to better serve county employees' and their dependents' primary health needs in a more convenient and cost effective manner. The clinic contract will cost $738,000 in 2015 with primary care being added for employees. It is anticipated that there will be a savings to the insurance plan of over $ 1 ,500, 000, with a return on investment of at least 2 to1 . All of these efforts have contributed towards our goal of holding down healthcare costs to our employees and their dependents. The success of the efforts is demonstrated by NO health insurance rate increases for 2015 for the county or its employees. 467 IS - HEALTH INSURANCE (CONTINUED) 6200-93100/93400 FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION (CONTINUED): In 2015, it is recommended to continue that the base health plan offered along with the standard PPO be a high deductible health plan with a health reimbursement account (HRA) option through CIGNA. The County will contribute $1 ,000 to the HRA for those employees taking the high deductible health/HRA plan . The standard PPO option offered will have higher deductibles, co-pays, and out of pocket expenses. The health plan options are consistent with the changes being made by the health insurance industry and by major employers offering employee and dependent healthcare benefits. The 2015 program is calculated with current participation as follows: Single Coverage: 509 Dependent Coverage: 584 FIXED COSTS: Health Insurance $ 1 ,496, 061 On-site Clinic 738,000 Administration/Wellness/EAP Costs 185,000 Fixed Costs: $ 2 ,419,061 LOSS FUND: Medical $ 15,249,983 Dental 155,000 Vision 90, 000 Loss Fund Costs $ 15,494,983 GRAND TOTAL - COSTS $ 17.914,044 REVENUE: Health Premiums $ 17,669,044 Dental/Vision 245,000 TOTAL REVENUE $ 17, 914,044 BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Single coverage 485 516 509 Family coverage 560 590 584 468 INSURANCE SUMMARY OF REVENUES 2015 2014 2015 2015 2015 Fund Ord Acct Account Title Budget Request Recommend Final TAXES 6300 93300 4112 CURRENT PROPERTY TAXES 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 6300 93200 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 90,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 MISCELLANEOUS 6300 93300 4610 EARNINGS ON INVESTMENTS 30,000 30;000 30,000 30;000 6300 93300 4820 COMPENSATION FOR LOSSES 20,000 50.000 50,000 50,000 TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS 50,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 TOTAL INSURANCE FUND 2,140,000 2,160,000 2,160,000 2,160,000 469 INSURANCE SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2015 2014 2015 2015 2015 Fund Org Expenditure Function Budget Request Recommend Final 6300 93200 WORKERS COMPENSATION 1 ,461 ,300 1 ,461 ,300 1 ,461 ,300 1 ,461 ,300 6300 93300 LIABILITY 678,700 698,700 698,700 698,700 TOTAL INSURANCE 2,140,000 2,160,000 2,160,000 2,160,000 470 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: IS - INSURANCE BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Insurance Fund - - 6300-93200/93300 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Central fund to provide county-wide insurance coverage. This fund is administered by Finance and Administration unit in the General Fund . RESOURCES ACTUAL LAST BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 3,072 3, 500 3,500 3,500 Purchased Services 38,651 43, 500 43, 500 43,500 Fixed Charges 2,240,075 2, 093,000 2, 113,000 2, 113,000 Gross County Cost $ 2 ,281 ,798 $ 2 , 140,000 $ 2, 160,000 $ 2, 160,000 Revenue 230,543 140,000 160,000 160,000 Net County Cost $ 2,051 ,255 $ 2 ,000,000 $ 2 ,000,000 $ 2,000,000 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The budget is structured with Weld County remaining a member of CAPP, but using the self-insured option under the insurance pool for a fixed cost of $373,700. Effective January 1 , 1992, Weld County became self-insured for workers compensation . Workers Compensation includes excess insurance and bonds costing $ 180,000, claims administration costs of $43, 300, and a loss fund of $1 ,238,000. A loss fund for all other insurance coverage is budgeted at $325,000. Unemployment insurance is being charged directly to departments. The program is supported by property tax ($2 , 000,000), charges for service ($80, 000), interest ($30,000), and compensation for losses ($50,000). No fund balance reserves are anticipated to be needed to support the loss fund in 2015. Property tax remains at $2 , 000,000 due to workers' compensation claim history. Claim costs for workers compensation have been increasing due to rising healthcare costs. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the insurance program as outlined above in the summary of changes. In accordance with Section 8-44-204, C. R.S. , it is recommended that a mill levy be used to fund the insurance program for local county activities and a charge back mechanism be used only for programs funded by state and federal funding sources. Weld County, through CAPP, has reduced limits of coverage and placed reliance on sovereign immunity to stay within the budgeted amount. The legislative changes in 1986 strengthened the county's position in the use of sovereign immunity limits in Colorado cases. In addition , the county can levy up to 10 mills per year to discharge any judgment against it. Continuation of the self-insured program for workers compensation is recommended , which should result in cost savings, plus no shared risks with other counties. Unemployment costs are recommended to be charged directly to departments for revenue raising strategies and departmental accountability for costs. BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . 471 INSURANCE FUND (CONTINUED) 6300-93200/93300 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Number of training sessions 34 36 36 Dollar amount workers compensation claims $ 1 , 182 ,673 1 ,238,000 1 ,238,000 Dollar amount of prop/casualty claims paid $482,421 $325,000 $325,000 Efficiency Measures FTE'S per 10,000/capita 0.037 0 .036 0.035 Per capita cost (county support) $8.79 $7.26 $7.05 472 PHONE SERVICES SUMMARY OF REVENUES 2015 2014 2015 2015 2015 Fund Ord Acct Account Title Budget Request Recommend Final CHARGE FOR SERVICES 6400 17400 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 1 ,292,248 1 ,412,749 1 ,412,749 1 ,412,749 TOTAL PHONE SERVICES 1 ,292,248 1 ,412,749 1 ,412,749 1 ,412,749 473 PHONE SERVICES SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2015 2014 2015 2015 2015 Fund Org Expenditure Function Budget Request Recommend Final 6400 17400 PHONE SERVICES 1 ,542,248 1 ,662,749 1 ,662,749 1 ,662,749 TOTAL PHONE SERVICES 1 ,542,248 1 ,662,749 1 ,662,749 1 ,662,749 474 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Phone Services - - 6400-17400 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Provide phone services to Weld County and the Court system . RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 179,505 $ 249,429 $ 286,504 $ 286,504 Supplies 19, 120 14, 100 600 600 Purchased Services 791 , 082 733,966 800,262 800,262 Fixed Charges 307,023 294,753 325,383 325,383 Capital 70, 148 250,000 250,000 250,000 Gross County Cost $ 1 ,366,878 $ 1 , 542 ,248 $ 1 ,662 ,749 $ 1 ,662 ,749 Revenue/Fund Bal . 1 ,209, 188 1 ,542,248 1 ,662,749 1 ,662,749 Net County Cost $ 157,690 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budgeted Positions 2 3 3 3 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Personnel Services are up $37,075 with the staffing of three FTE's and the cost-of-living adjustment. Supplies are down due to small items of equipment being $13,500 less. Phone costs are up due to the costs associated with the Human Services tablet grant ($43,200), usage, and slight rate increases. The county will be reimbursed for the data rates via the grant. $ 11 , 000 has been added for cabling additions, moves and changes. This is for the new position as the department anticipates he will be doing smaller cabling jobs for a much lower rate than contractors have in the past. Other professional services have been reduced accordingly. Depreciation is up $ 13,826 due added capital invested for phone upgrades in recent years. Overall the budget is up $ 120,501 with corresponding increases in revenue. A 6% rate increase for 2015 is anticipated . FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . 475 PHONE SERVICES (CONTINUED) 6400- 17400 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Incoming calls 5,850,000 5,900,000 6,000,000 Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita .074 1 .090 1 .058 Per capita cost (county support) $5.05 $5.60 $5.86 Annual cost per call $0.234 $0.282 $0.277 Goal ES18: Capitalize on phone technology to improve service, increase efficiency and provide greater phone access and exchange. DESIRED PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES OBJECTIVE/KEY ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S) ES18- 1 : User Percent of users (residents, visitors, friendly phone employees, etc.) satisfied with phone 99% 99% 99% services access to services and information 476 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: WELD COUNTY FINANCE AUTHORITY BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Weld County Finance Authority - - 6500-17700 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Provides funds to cover the lease/purchase of county buildings. RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Revenue 0 0 0 I 0 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Budget reflects the county's debt service on any long-term debt and/or any lease purchase debt in any given year. With the payoff of the correctional facilities' Certificates of Participation (COP) as of August 1 , 2007, Weld County has no long-term debt or long-term lease obligations. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval . BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended . 477 Of p C-:::) UN )1°1N rre0 \ 1 8 6 1 a ilk 4ye GLOSSARY ACCOUNTING PROCEDURES All processes which discover, record , classify, and summarize financial information to produce financial reports and to provide internal control . ACCRUAL BASIS The basis of accounting under which transactions are recognized when they occur, regardless of the timing of related cash flows. ACCRUED EXPENSES Expenses incurred but not due until a later date. ACTIVITY A specific and distinguishable line of work performed by one or more organizational components of a government for the purpose of accomplishing a function for which the government is responsible. For example, "food inspection" is an activity performed in the discharge of the "health" function . ACTIVITY CLASSIFICATION Expenditure classification according to the specific lines of work performed by organization units. For example, "sewage treatment and disposal", "garbage collection", "garbage disposal", and "street cleaning" are activities performed in carrying out the function of "sanitation" . The segregation of the expenditures made for each of these activities constitutes an activity classification . ALLOCATE To divide a lump-sum appropriation into parts which are designated for expenditure by specific organizational units and/or for specific purposes, activities, or objects. ALLOCATED COSTS Indirect costs distributed to programs or departments via a cost allocation plan . ALLOCATION A part of a lump-sum appropriation which is designated for expenditure by specific organizational units and/or for special purposes, activities, or objects. ALLOT To divide an appropriation into amounts which may be encumbered or expended during an allotment period . ALLOTMENT A part of an appropriation which may be encumbered or expended during an allotment period . ALLOTMENT PERIOD A period of time less than one fiscal year in length during which an allotment is effective. Bi-monthly and quarterly allotment periods are most common . ANNUAL BUDGET A budget applicable to a single fiscal year. 479 APPROPRIATION A legal authorization granted by a legislative body to make expenditures and to incur obligations for specific purposes. An appropriation is usually limited in amount and as to the time when it may be expended . APPROPRIATION BILL, ORDINANCE, RESOLUTION, or ORDER A bill , ordinance, resolution , or order by means of which appropriations are given legal effect. It is the method by which the expenditure side of the annual operating budget is enacted into law by the legislative body. In many governmental jurisdictions, appropriations cannot be enacted into law by resolution but only by a bill , ordinance, or order. APPROPRIATION EXPENDITURE An expenditure chargeable to an appropriation . Since virtually all expenditures of governments are chargeable to appropriations, the term expenditures by itself is widely and properly used . ASSESSED VALUATION A valuation set upon real estate or other property by a government as a basis for levying taxes. AUTHORITY A government or public agency created to perform a single function or a restricted group of related activities. Usually such units are financed from service charges, fees, and tolls, but in some instances they also have taxing powers. An authority may be completely independent of other governments or partially dependent upon other governments for its creation , its financing , or the exercise of certain powers. AUTHORIZED POSITION A position (job) authorized by the Board of County Commissioners as part of the annual adopted budget. BOND An interest bearing promise to pay with a specific maturity. BALANCED BUDGET A balanced budget occurs when the total sum of money a government collects in a year is equal to the amount it spends on goods, services, and debt interest. BUDGET A plan of financial operation embodying an estimate of proposed expenditures for a given period and the proposed means of financing them . Used without any modifier, the term usually indicates a financial plan for a single fiscal year. The term "budget" is used in two senses in practice. Sometimes it designates the financial plan presented to the appropriating body for adoption and sometimes the plan finally approved by that body. It is usually necessary to specify whether the budget under consideration is preliminary and tentative or whether it has been approved by the appropriating body. 480 BUDGET DOCUMENT The instrument used by the budget-making authority to present a comprehensive financial program to the appropriating body. The budget document usually consists of three parts. The first pad contains a message from the budget-making authority, together with a summary of the proposed expenditures and the means of financing them . The second consists of schedules supporting the summary. These schedules show, in detail , the information as to past years' actual revenues, expenditures, and other data used in making the estimates. The third part is composed of drafts of the appropriation , revenue, and borrowing measures necessary to put the budget into effect. BUDGET MESSAGE A general discussion of the proposed budget as presented in writing by the budget-making authority to the legislative body. The budget message should contain an explanation of the principal budget items, an outline of the government's experience during the past period and its financial status at the time of the message, and recommendations regarding the financial policy for the coming period . BUDGETARY ACCOUNTS Accounts used to enter the formally adopted annual operating budget into the general ledger as part of the management control technique of formal budgetary integration . BUDGETARY COMPARISONS Governmental GAAP financial reports must include comparisons of approved budgeted amounts with actual results of operations. Such reports should be subjected to an independent audit, so that all parties involved in the annual operating budget/legal appropriation process are provided with assurances that government monies are spent in accordance with the mutually agreed-upon budgetary plan . BUDGETARY CONTROL The control or management of a government or enterprise in accordance with an approved budget for the purpose of keeping expenditures within the limitations of available appropriations and available revenues. BUDGETARY EXPENDITURES Decreases in net current assets. In contrast to conventional expenditures, budgetary expenditures are limited in amount to exclude amounts represented by noncurrent liabilities. Due to their spending measurement focus, governmental fund types are concerned with the measurement of budgetary expenditures. BUDGETED FUNDS Funds that are planned for certain uses but have not been formally or legally appropriated by the legislative body. The budget document that is submitted for Board approval is composed of budgeted funds. CALLABLE BONDS Bonds which are redeemable by the issuer prior to the maturity date at a specified price at or above par. 481 CAPITAL BUDGET A plan of proposed capital outlays and the means of financing them . CAPITAL OUTLAY Expenditures for equipment, vehicles, or machinery that results in the acquisition or addition to fixed assets. CAPITAL PROGRAM A plan for capital expenditures to be incurred each year over a fixed period of years to meet capital needs arising from the long-term work program or otherwise. It sets forth each project or other contemplated expenditure in which the government is to have a part and specifies the full resources estimated to be available to finance the projected expenditures. CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND A fund created to account for financial resources to be used for the acquisition or construction of major capital facilities (other than those financed by proprietary funds, Special Assessment Funds, and Trust Funds). CAPITAL RESOURCES Resources of a fixed or permanent character, such as land and buildings, which cannot ordinarily be used to meet current expenditures. CER TIFI CA TES OF PARTICIPATION (COP) Form of financial instrument similar to a bond to facilitate lease/ purchase agreements. Not a debt of the County. CONSERVATION TRUST State of Colorado lottery funds remitted to the County for parks and recreation use. CONTINGENCY ACCOUNT A budgetary reserve set aside for emergencies or unforeseen expenditures not otherwise included in the budget. CONTINUING APPROPRIATION An appropriation which , once established , is automatically renewed without further legislative action , period after period , until altered or revoked . The term should not be confused with INDETERMINATE APPROPRIATION . COST ALLOCATION PLAN Identification , accumulation and distribution of costs relative to the provision of those services, along with the methods used . DEFAULT Failure to pay principal or interest when due. Defaults can also occur for failure to meet nonpayment obligations, such as reporting requirements, or when a material problem occurs for the issuer, such as a bankruptcy. DEFICIT ( 1 ) The excess of the liabilities of a fund over its assets. (2) The excess of expenditures over revenues during an accounting period ; or, in the case of proprietary funds, the excess of expense over income during an accounting period . 482 DEPRECIATION ( 1 ) Expiration in the service life of fixed assets, other than wasting assets attributable to wear and tear, deterioration , action of the physical elements, inadequacy, and obsolescence. (2) The portion of the cost of a fixed asset other than a wasting asset which is charged as an expense during a particular period . In accounting for depreciation , the cost of a fixed asset, less any salvage value, is prorated over the estimated service life of such an asset, and each period is charged with a portion of such cost. Through this process, the entire cost of the asset is ultimately charged off as an expense. DIRECT COSTS Costs that have a clearly identifiable beneficial or causal relationship to the services performed . DURATION The weighted maturity of a fixed-income investment-s cash flows, used in the estimation of the price sensitivity of fixed-income securities for a given change in interest rates. ENCUMBRANCES Obligations in the form of purchase orders, contracts, or salary commitments which are chargeable to an appropriation and for which a part of the appropriation is reserved . They cease to be encumbrances when paid or when an actual liability is set up. ENTERPRISE FUND A fund established to finance and account for the acquisition , operation , and maintenance of governmental facilities and services which are entirely or predominantly self-supporting by user charges. The Paramedic Service operates as an Enterprise Fund . ESTIMATED REVENUE The amount of projected revenue to be collected during the fiscal year. The amount of revenue appropriated is the amount approved by the Board . EXPENDITURES Decreases in net financial resources. Expenditures include current operating expenses which require the current or future use of net current assets, debt service, and capital outlays. The unmodified use of the term expenditures in this text is intended to mean budgetary expenditures. FISCAL PERIOD Any period at the end of which a government determines its financial position and the results of its operations. FISCAL YEAR A 12-month period to which the annual operating budget applies and at the end of which a government determines its financial position and the results of its operations. FIXED ASSETS Assets of a long-term character which are intended to continue to be held or used , such as land , buildings, 483 improvements other than buildings, machinery and equipment. FTE (FULL-TIME EQUIVALENT) Numeric equivalent of one person occupying one employment position for one year (equivalent of 2, 080 hours or 52 forty-hour weeks). FUNCTION A group of related activities aimed at accomplishing a major service or regulatory program for which a government is responsible. For example, public health is a function . FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION Expenditure classification according to the principal purposes for which expenditures are made. Examples are public safety, public health , public welfare, etc. FUND A fiscal and accounting entity with a self-balancing set of accounts recording cash and other financial resources, together with all related liabilities and residual equities or balances, and changes therein , which are segregated for the purpose of carrying on specific activities or attaining certain objectives in accordance with special regulations, restrictions, or limitations. FUND BALANCE Fund balance is the excess of assets over liabilities and is therefore also known as surplus funds. GAAP (GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES) Standards for financial accounting and reporting . GENERAL FUND The fund used to account for all financial resources except those required to be accounted for in another fund . GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND A municipal bond secured by the pledge of the issuers full faith , credit and taxing power. GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM (GIS) A computerized data base of all land attributes within the County. The "base map" contains the least amount of common data which is supplemented by attribute overlays. GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS Funds generally used to account for tax-supported activities. There are five different types of governmental funds: the general fund , special revenue funds, debt service funds, capital funds, and permanent funds. GRANT A contribution by a government or other organization to support a particular function . Grants may be classified as either categorical or block depending upon the amount of discretion allowed the grantee. HIGHWAY USER TAX (HUTF) Revenue that is derived from the state gasoline tax, and restricted for Road and Bridge activities. 484 INDETERMINATE APPROPRIATION An appropriation which is not limited either to any definite period of time or to any definite amount. A distinction must be made between an indeterminate appropriation and a continuing appropriation . In the first place, whereas a continuing appropriation is indefinite only as to time, an indeterminate appropriation is indefinite as to both time and amount. In the second place, even indeterminate appropriations which are indefinite only as to time are to be distinguished from continuing appropriations in that such indeterminate appropriations may eventually lapse. For example, an appropriation to construct a building may be made to continue in effect until the building is constructed . Once the building is completed , however, the unexpended balance of the appropriation lapses. A continuing appropriation , on the other hand , may continue forever; it can only be abolished by specific action of the legislative body. INDIRECT COSTS Costs associated with , but not directly attributable to, the providing of a product or service. These costs are usually incurred by other departments in the support of operating departments. INTERFUND TRANSFER Amounts transferred from one fund to another. INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE Revenue received from another government for a specified purpose. In Weld County, these are funds from municipalities, the State of Colorado, and the Federal Government. INTERNAL SERVICE FUND Funds used to account for the financing of goods or services provided by one department to another department on a cost reimbursement basis, for example, the Phone Services Fund . LINE-ITEM BUDGET A budget that lists each expenditure category (salary, materials, telephone service, travel , etc. ) separately, along with the dollar amount budgeted for each specified category. MANDATE Any responsibility, action or procedure that is imposed by one sphere of government on another through constitutional , legislative, administrative, executive, or judicial action as a direct order or that is required as a condition of aid . MATURITY The date when the principal amount of a security is payable. MILL LEVY (TAX RATE) Rate applied to assessed valuation to determine property taxes. A mill is 1 /10th of a penny or $ 1 .00 of tax for each $ 1 ,000 of assessed valuation . 485 MODIFIED ACCRUAL BASIS The accrual basis of accounting adapted to the governmental fund type Spending Measurement Focus. Under it, revenues are recognized when they become both "measurable" and "available to finance expenditures of the current period". Expenditures are recognized when the related fund liability is incurred except for: ( 1 ) inventories of materials and supplies which may be considered expenditures either when purchased or when used ; (2) prepaid insurance and similar items which need not be reported ; (3) accumulated unpaid vacation , sick pay, and other employee benefit amounts which need not be recognized in the current period , but for which larger-than-normal accumulations must be disclosed in the notes to the financial statements; (4) interest on special assessment indebtedness which may be recorded when due rather than accrued , if approximately offset by interest earnings on special assessment levies; and (5) principal and interest on long-term debt which are generally recognized when due. All governmental funds and Expendable Trust Funds are accounted for using the modified accrual basis of accounting . NET BUDGET The net budget eliminates double counting in the budget, such as fund transfers, and thus represents the true level of programmed spending in the budget. NON-DEPARTMENTAL A category established to account for expenses not associated with any specific department, but all departments or many, within a fund . OBJECT As used in expenditure classification , this term applies to the article purchased or the service obtained (as distinguished from the results obtained from expenditures). Examples are personal services, contractual services, materials, and supplies. OPERATING BUDGET Plans of current expenditures and the proposed means of financing them . The annual operating budget (or, in the case of some state governments, the biennial operating budget) is the primary means by which most of the financing acquisition , spending , and service delivery activities of a government are controlled . The use of annual operating budgets is usually required by law. Even where not required by law, however, annual operating budgets are essential to sound financial management and should be adopted by every government. 486 OPERATING EXPENSES Proprietary fund expenses which are directly related to the fund's primary service activities. OPERATING GRANTS Grants which are restricted by the grantor to operating purposes or which may be used for either capital or operating purposes at the discretion of the grantee. OPERATING INCOME The excess of proprietary fund operating revenues over operating expenses. OPERATING TRANSFER Routine and/or recurring transfers of assets between funds. ORGANIZATIONAL UNIT A responsibility center within a government. ORGANIZATION UNIT CLASSIFICATION Expenditure classification according to responsibility centers within a government's organization structure. Classification of expenditures by organization unit is essential to fixing stewardship responsibility for individual government resources. OVERHEAD Those elements of cost necessary in the production of an article or the performance of a service which are of such a nature that the amount applicable to the product or service cannot be determined accurately or readily. Usually they relate to those objects of expenditure which do not become an integral part of the finished product or service such as rent, heat, light, supplies, management, supervision , etc. PROGRAM An organized set of related work activities which are directed toward a common purpose or goal and represent a well defined expenditure of county resources. PROGRAM BUDGET A budget wherein expenditures are based primarily on programs of work and secondarily on character and object class. A program budget is a transitional type of budget between the traditional character and object class budget, on the one hand , and the performance budget, on the other. PROPRIETARY FUND A fund used to account for business-type activities in government. The activities are usually financed with user fees that are directly related to the services received . There are two types of proprietary funds - enterprise and internal service funds. RATINGS Designations used by credit rating agencies to give relative indications of credit quality. RECIDIVISM A relapse into criminal habits after punishment. REGISTERED BOND A bond whose owner is registered with the issuer or its agent. Transfer of ownership can only be accomplished when the securities are properly endorsed by the registered owner. 487 REIMBURSEMENTS ( 1 ) Repayments of amounts remitted on behalf of another party. (2) Interfund transactions which constitute reimbursements of a fund for expenditures or expenses initially made from it which are properly applicable to another fund -- e.g . , an expenditure properly chargeable to a Special Revenue Fund was initially made from the General Fund , which is subsequently reimbursed . They are recorded as expenditures or expenses (as appropriate) in the reimbursing fund and as reductions of the expenditure or expense in the fund that is reimbursed . RESERVE ( 1 ) An account used to earmark a portion of fund balance to indicate that it is not appropriate for expenditure. (2) An account used to earmark a portion of fund equity as legally segregated for a specific future use. RESIDUAL EQUITY TRANSFER Non-recurring or non-routine transfers of assets between funds. REVENUE ( 1 ) Increases in governmental fund type net current assets from other than expenditure refunds and residual equity transfers. Under NCGA Statement 1 , general long-term debt proceeds and operating transfers-in are classified as "other financing sources" rather than revenues. (2) Increases in proprietary fund type net total assets from other than expense refunds, capital contributions, and residual equity transfers. Under NCGA Statement 1 , operating transfers-in are classified separately from revenues. REVENUE BOND A municipal bond payable from revenues derived from tolls, charges or rents paid by users of the facility constructed with the proceeds of the bond issue. SOURCE OF REVENUE Revenues are classified according to their source or point of origin . SPECIAL REVENUE FUND A fund used to account for revenues legally earmarked for a particular purpose. SUBACTIVITY A specific line of work performed in carrying out a governmental activity. For example, "cleaning luminaries" and "replacing defective street lamps" would be subactivities under the activity of "street light maintenance". SUBFUNCTION A grouping of related activities within a particular governmental function . For example, "police" is a subfunction of the function "public safety". 488 SURPLUS The use of the term "surplus" in governmental accounting is generally discouraged because it creates a potential for misleading inference. TABOR (TAXPAYERS BILL OF RIGHTS) An amendment to the Colorado Constitution approved by the voters in November 1992 . The Taxpayers Bill of Rights has been incorporated in the State Constitution as Section 20 of Article X. The amendment limits growth in both state and local government revenue and expenditures, makes provision for annual elections, and requires voter approval for tax increases. TABOR RESERVE Term applied to a reserve which is required by the TABOR Amendment. Starting in 1995 this reserve is 3% of "Fiscal Year Spending" excluding bonded debt service. This reserve is for use in declared emergencies only. TAXES Compulsory charges levied by a government for the purpose of financing services performed for the common benefit. This term does not include specific charges made against particular persons or property for current or permanent benefits such as special assessments. Neither does the term include charges for services rendered only to those paying such charges as, for example, sewer service charges. TAX LEVY The total amount to be raised by general property taxes. TAX RATE The amount of tax stated in terms of a unit of the tax base; for example, 25 mills per dollar of assessed valuation of taxable property. TAX RATE LIMIT The maximum rate at which a government may levy a tax. The limit may apply to taxes raised for a particular purpose, or to taxes imposed for all purposes, and may apply to a single government, to a class of governments, or to all governments operating in a particular area. Overall tax rate limits usually restrict levies for all purposes and of all governments, state and local , having jurisdiction in a given area. TAX ROLL The official list showing the amount of taxes levied against each taxpayer or property. Frequently, the tax roll and the assessment roll are combined , but even in these cases the two can be distinguished . TRADITIONAL BUDGET A term sometimes applied to the budget of a government wherein expenditures are based entirely or primarily on objects of expenditure. UNINCORPORATED COUNTY Those portions of the county that are not part of a legal entity such as a city or some towns. 489 WELL PROGRAM Wellness health program provided as a fringe benefit to employees. WORKLOAD MEASURES Specific quantitative and qualitative measures of work performed as an objective of the department. WORK PROGRAM A plan of work proposed to be done during a particular period by the administrative agency in carrying out its assigned activities. WORK UNIT A fixed quantity which will consistently measure work effort expended in the performance of an activity or the production of a commodity. YIELD The annual percentage rate of return earned on a security. Yield is a function of a security's purchase price and coupon interest rate. NOTE : Most of the above definitions were taken from Governmental Accounting, Auditing, and Financial Reporting, GFOA, Chicago, 2012, Appendix G . pp. 1051 -1093. 490 ACRONYMS AAA Area Agency on Aging ACS Affiliated Computer Services ARRA American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. CAFR Comprehensive Annual Financial Report CAPP Colorado Counties Casualty and Property Pool CC/ Colorado Counties Inc. association of Colorado counties. CDBG Community Development Block Grant CDHS Colorado Department of Human Services CDOT Colorado Department of Transportation C/P Capital Improvement Plan COPS UHS Federal community oriented policing grant. COLA Cost of Living Allowance CMAQ Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program CPI Consumer Price Index C.R.S. Colorado Revised Statutes CSBG Community Services Block Grant DA District Attorney DHS Department of Human Services DOC Colorado Department of Corrections DOLA Colorado Department of Local Affairs DUI Driving Under the Influence EDAP Economic Development Action Partnership . EOC Emergency Operations Center 491 FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency FOMC Federal Open market Committee FTE Full Time Equivalent GAAP Generally Accepted Accounting Principles GASB Government Accounting Standards Board GFOA Government Finance Officers Association GIS Geographical Information System HARP Haul Route Program HES Hazard Elimination Program for transportation projects. HUTF Highway Users Tax Fund . HRA Health Reimbursement Account HVAC Heating , ventilation , and air conditioning IT Information Technology IGS Intergovernmental Service Fund IGA Intergovernmental Agreement LEAP Low-income Energy Assistance Program MOU Memorandum of Understanding MOE Maintenance of Effort MS4 Municipal Separate Storm Sewer for storm management NCMC North Colorado Medical Center NFRMPO North Front Range Metropolitan Planning Organization NRBH North Range Behavioral Health O&M Operations and maintenance OEM Office of Emergency Management OPED Other Post Employment Benefits PERA Colorado Public Employees' Retirement Association PPACA Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) PPO Preferred Provider Organization 492 ROW Right-of way SH Abbreviation for State Highway TABOR Taxpayers Bill of Rights TANF Temporary Assistance to Needy Families. UNC University of Northern Colorado URA Urban Renewal Authority VALE Victim Assistance Law Enforcement VW Victim Witness WCR Weld County Road . WCRCC Weld County Regional Communications Center 493 494 2014 -2015 ECONOMIC & DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE WELD COUNTY , COLORADO _ , - SNAPSHOT �I� renne�,� Y , Nc NFBRA &A 2013/2012 STATISTICS - - - - - - - - - - - Square Miles: 3,987 WELD Communities: 31 287 85 COUNTY Population: 269,785 COLORADO Labor Force: 127,731 2 5 2013 Unemployment: 7.1 % Fort Collins / Median Age: 34 .1 2012 Per Capita Income: $31 ,657 ' " ' ' '' 34 Greeley 2012 Household Income: $55,332 lowland 34 HS+ Graduate: 85% + ` ' n,/ Avg. Annual Wage: $43,172 - ID i Primary Industry Sectors: - Longmont 7 Manufacturing Agriculture Boar -, .. Energy Production p Denvrr Health & Wellness -_. inter ridtiondI Aitpurt ...../-i,....0-. Business Services 70 , GRP: $8.1 Billion Denver � ' Source: Stats America, EMS!, BLS. Most recent (-470 annual statistic published — 2013 or 2012 i CLIMATE LOCATION/TRANSPORTATION The area offers a dry sunny climate with Source: Sperling's Best Places- 2013 Annual Avg. low humidity and all four season Climate Greeley U.S. Highway Access — Rainfall (inches) 14 36.5 North/South Demand — 1-25 and State Highway 85 East/West Demand — 1-76, State Highway 34 & State Highway 14 Snowfall (inches) 41 25 Precipitation 69 100 Freight Rail Access — (see following map) Days Class 1 —Union Pacific (UP) & Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Sunny Days 244 205 Short Line — The Great Western Railway of Colorado (GWR) Avg. July High 90 86.5 Avg. Jan Low 15.3 20.5 Air Access — Denver International Airport (DIA) - fifth business airport in the US Comfort Index 55 44 (30 minute commute from South Weld; hour from Central/West Weld) (higher = better) Greeley/Weld County Airport — General Aviation (www.gxy.net) UV Index 5.2 4.3 Erie Municipal Airport — General Aviation (www.eriecogov.com) Elevation (feet; 4,746 1 ,443 Fort Collins-Loveland Airport — General Aviation (www.fortloveair.com) 495 Northern Colorado Major Rail Lines I CULTURAL/ RECREATIONAL .1l 'as ti WYOMING NEBI AMENITIES COLORADO n; Weld County offers a rich and diverse selection of cultural Great Western Railway and recreational opportunities including numerous golf (short line) courses, a multitude of parks, miles of paved bike/ �ington pedestrian paths, the Pawnee National Grasslands and numerous annual events including : The Greeley Stampede Colorado Farm Show Greeley Blues Jam UNC/Greeley Jazz Festival Fort '� Union Facific Railway Y CoPi - Tmna c Union ,,Y, ,., • Weld County Fair Windsor Harvest Festival Arno ' � .ti incisor , Numerous Community Summer Celebrations ey ` . ohnstow, .. The1 ,600 seat Greeley Union Colony Civic Center Berthoud ).__ _ provides even more entertainment options along with \� UNC Bears Division I Athletics. A Weld location also _ `� >saas offers easy access to multiple world class ski areas, tor, oi)t , �' p camping, fishing , hunting, snow sports, hiking and all the Rocky Mountains have to offer. • Weld County is Colorado after all! tilde-. Burlington Northern Santa _- For more information visit websites of our 31. . ( ' �,, communities and the following Weld County web sites '� "'s www.discoverweld.com . - www.upstatecolorado.orq DEMOGRAPHICS With a median age of 34, Weld offers a young population that Educational % of Pop Population Estimates % Dist. in grew by 49% from 2000-2013. Attainment: ACS 2012 25+ by Race and Hispanic County The 2013 population is 269,785, of Total Population 25 + 100.0% Origin in 2013 which 28% is Hispanic and 85% Less than 9th Grade 7.0% American Ind. or 1 .7% are HS+ graduates. Per capita 9th-12th, No Diploma 8.0% Alaskan native Alone income is $31 ,657 and median HS Graduate/equivalent 26.3% Asian Alone 1 .4% household income is $55,332. Some College/No Degree 24.2% Black Alone 1 .3% Associate Degree 8.8% Native Hawaiian and Bachelor's Degree 17.8% Other Pacific Island 0.2% Population Over Time Number Graduate, Professional/ Alone 2013 269,785 0% Doctorate Degree 8. White Alone 93.4% 2010 252,825 HS Graduate + 85. 1 % Two or More Race 2000 180,936 Groups 2. 1 % Bachelor's Degree + 25.8% p 2000 to 2010 % change 39.7% Non-Hispanic or Latino 71 .6% Components of change 2012-13 Households in 2012 Number Hispanic or Latino 28.4% Net Migration 3,709 Total Households 89,553 Natural (births —deaths; 2,346 Avg. Household Size 2.76 Median Income Number 2010 Housing Units Median household Population Estimates 96,281 $55,332 by Age in 2012 Number (Census C Median Home Value $219,412 Median household Preschool (0 to 4) 19,759 income in 2000 (adj. for $56,739 School Age (5 to 17) 53,036 inflation) College Age (18 to 24) 27,664 Per Capita Personal Number 5-year percent change ° Income—2.5 /o Young Adult (25 to 44, 74,578 PC Income — 2012 $31 ,657 (2000 to 2012) Older Adult (45 to 64) 65,460 PC Income — Source: Scats America, Census, BLS & BEA Older Adult (65+; 29,288 2002 (adj. for inflation) $32,247 Median Age 34 10-year % change -1 .8% 496 SUB - REGIONS & COMMUNITIES The sheer size and diversity of Weld County allows it to meet almost any type of site requirement from North suburban Denver 1-25 needs in South Weld to the booming opportunities of the 1-25 and Hwy 34 corridors in Central/West Weld , to the wide open spaces of farmland/prairie in East and North Weld. 5 CR 126 CR 125 - 85 CR 122 t Grover UP CR 120 . R CR 350 R 7 1 .. 7 2 7 CR 100 Nunn Pierce 04) Ncla Ault New Raymer asp Severance GW R Eaton / i• %M . . Windsor 3s2 t •. Gt'�R Greek rport North 34 Garden City • Kersey North & East Weld County Central/West Weld County fri'R s UP Evans South Weld County Milliken La Salle atm Jotjnstovih' 34 Berhoud S 60 •.• Gilcrest c EAST/NORTH WELD COUNTY •• Home to the Pawnee National Grasslands, Mem' 4 :Platteville s this sub region is the most rural in the •' • • 76 • . • County with an estimated municipal GWR •'' : BNSF population of less 1 ,000. However, it's • become one of the most important energy Li . niont g Firestone regions for both oil/gas development and • • -yKeenesburg wind farms. It's also an important farming Frederic : and livestock grazing area. East/west :Fort Lupton ® Dacono ' access through the region is provided by Erie : UP Hudson Hwy. 14 which intersects with Hwy. 85 and _ 1-25. 5'aBrighton Morthgtenn Thornton LoC Buie SOUTH WELD COUNTY CENTRAL/WEST WELD COUNTY With a population estimated to reach 81 ,304 by 2019, the With a population estimated to reach 184,794 by 2019, this sub southern region of Weld has experienced some of the fastest region is the most populace of the County. With 60,820 growth recently. Offering an attractive small town/rural quality of households with an average median disposable income of life with abundant new homes, excellent schools and majestic $46,023, it's the retail core and offers an attractive lifestyles mix mountain views; the region is strategically located just north of from mid-size cities to small rural communities nestled in metro Denver and east of Boulder, which has fueled booming amongst some of the most productive farm land in the country. residential growth. With 23,042 households who have an average The median household income average is $55,357 and the median disposable income of $54,695, the region is poised to median house value average is $192,490. This sub-region offers see continued growth. The median household income average is spectacular mountain views and quality of life with plenty of $65,837, the median home value average is $227,584 and the outdoor recreation, excellent schools and easy access to two sub-region offers a wide-range of educational opportunities, sport state universities. Developed commercial/ industrial sites abound venues and recreation. Commercial/ industrial sites are available and the region has seen numerous employers locate/expand and large tracts of undeveloped land provide opportunity for which has produced a vibrant/growing business sector. The future growth. East/west access is provided by Hwy. 52 which region has excellent east/west access via US Hwy. 14 and Hwy connects to 1-76 and 1-25. North/south access is provided by 1-25 34 which connect to 1-25 and 1-76. Hwy. 85 provides north/south and Hwy 85 which connects to 1-70 in Denver and 1-80 in access connecting to 1-70 in Denver and 1-80 in Wyoming. Main/ Wyoming. DIA is 20-30 minutes away. short line rail access is ample and DIA is about an hour away. 497 2014 Estimated Weld Sub Region & Municipal Demographic Summary Information Source: ESRI: Note: Sub-region values are totals or averages of all communities within the region. Multiple County Place (mcp, data included when city center is located in Weld to more accurately portray sub region. Local Median Median Median 2019 Est. 2014 Est. Sales Diversity Disposable House- Household Home Per Capita Population Population Tax Index Income holds Income Value Income Weld County 297,514 269,785 0.0% 59.2 42,299 95,119 54,910 219,412 25,320 North/East Sub Region 730 683 12.2 44,944 279 54,501 187,139 25,861 Grover (grovercolorado.org) 135 135 0.0 31 .2 43,834 61 52,706 182,143 25,291 Nunn (nunncolorado.com) 501 453 2.0 5.4 48,055 181 58,083 210,526 I 27,082 Raymer (townofraymer@yahoo.com) 94 95 0.0 0.0 42,944 37 52,715 168,750 25,211 Central/West Sub Region 184,794 170,779 53.2 46,023 60,820 55,357 192,490 24,741 Ault (townofault.org) 1 ,700 1 ,583 3.0 56.2 37,628 603 46, 194 147,845 22,442 Eaton (eatoneco.org) 4,742 4,513 3.0 36.7 49, 165 1 ,677 59,087 222,287 29, 188 Evans (cityofevans.org 20,673 19,586 3.5 71 .6 37, 150 6,608 44,412 161 ,862 17,868 Garden City (townofgardencity.com) 208 218 3.0 74.6 26,663 104 29,389 _ 107,500 18,223 Gilcrest 1 ,251 1 ,131 4.0 68.4 40,751 356 48,200 195.536 19,548 Greeley (greeleygov.com) 102,045 96,716 3.46 67.3 35,699 34,953 41 ,703 192,659 21 ,676 Johnstown 14,555 12,132 3.0 42.4 56, 178 4,118 70,597 256,818 29,234 _ Kersey (townofkersey.com) 1 ,650 1 ,510 3.6 52.4 61 ,469 515 61 ,469 182,353 25,614 La Salle (Iasalletown.com) 2,119 2,014 3.5 62.6 40,762 723 49,287 163,439 21 ,776 Millliken (mi►Iikenco.gov) 6,066 5,778 2.5 61 .2 51 ,580 1 ,924 61 ,875 182,644 24,993 _ Pierce (townofpierce.com) 927 873 2.0 46.4 41 ,704 328 51 ,430 143,182 23,483 Severance (townofseverance.org) 4,141 3,326 3.0 23.8 61 ,504 1 ,165 79,481 258,953 33,964 Windsor (mcp) (windsorgov.com) 24,717 21 ,399 3.2 28.3 58,050 7,746 76,523 287,298 33,626 South Sub Region 81 ,304 68,611 53.2 54,695 23,042 65,837 227,584 27,309 Berthoud (mcp) see note Brighton (mcp) see note Dacono (ci.dacono.co.us) 6,954 4,407 3.0 68.9 38,807 1 ,547 45,523 146,695 19,734 Erie (mcp) (erieco.gov) 22,328 19,863 3.5 34.9 81 ,652 6,896 104,595 369,744 44,900 Firestone (ci.firestone.co.us) 12,928 11 ,269 3.0 45.7 84, 115 3,634 84, 115 263,847 30,886 Fort Lupton (fortlupton.org) 7,456 7,377 4.0 74.6 38,015 2,399 45,855 163,239 17,719 Frederick (frederickco.gov) 13, 170 10,437 2.5 42.6 59,072 3,526 76,990 264,028 30, 175 Hudson (hudsoncolorado.org) 3,216 2,443 4.0 60.1 44,105 548 54,166 179,545 23,179 Keenesburg (townofkeenesburg.com) 1 ,458 1 ,261 3.0 35.5 43,440 494 53,455 214,744 22,666 Lochbuie (mcp) (lochbuie.org) 6,746 5, 123 4.0 66.7 42,753 1 ,779 51 ,003 173,113 22,662 Longmont (mcp) see note Mead (mead-co.gov) 4,273 3,817 2.0 31 .0 67,683 1 ,308 85,951 319,718 37,556 Northglenn (mcp) see note 4.0 Platteville (plattevillegove.org) _ 2,775 2,614 3.0 72.0 47,311 911 56,720 181 ,171 23,621 Thornton (mcp) see note GROSS REGIONAL COST OF LIVING PRODUCT ( GRP ) The Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the Denver-Boulder-Greeley area increased 2.9% from the EXPORTS & IMPORTS 181 half of 2013 to the 181 half 2014. The Q1/2014 Denver Cost of Living Index (CLI) — 106.6 Note: CPI is measure of the average change in prices over time in a fixed market basket of goods/services. CLI 2012 Total Weld GRP - $8.1 Billion measures relative price levels for consumer goods/services in select major cities compared with national average of 100. Source: BLS. Metro Denver EDC. Council for Community & Economic Research C2ER Cost of Living Index. Earnings - $5.2 Billion Property Income - $2.4 Billion UNEMPLOYMENT RATE Taxes on Production —$477 Million Exports - $13.5 Billion (80% of Supply 2013 Labor Force Annual Averages Imports $14. 6 Billion (81% of Demand) Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Locally Produced/Consumed - $3.3 Billion Weld Colorado (19% of Demand) Total Labor Force 127, 731 2, 754, 870 Employed 118, 609 2, 568, 150 Note: GRP measures final market value of Unemployed 9, 122 186, 720 goods/services produced. Source: EMS/ Unemployment Rate 7. 1 % 6. 8% 498 WELD LABOR FORCE 2012 2013 Growing/Declining Industries Total Employee Earnings Job Distribution & (Change in Jobs 2010-2014) by NAICS Average Wage by Source: StetsAmerica,; US Bureau of NAICS Growing Industries Jobs Economic Analysis (BEA) Source: StetsAmerica, US Bureau of Support Activities - Oil/Gas +3,424 Labor Statistics (BLS) Telemarketing/Contact Centers +1 ,138 Earnings Avg % Dist. Structures Construction +812 NAICS Place of Work ($000) Jobs Earnings/ Firms in Job County - Declining Industries Jobs Total by Place of Work 5,587,663 Offices of Physicians -284 Wage and Salary 3,916,170 90,388 $43,172 5,970 100.0% Local Government Proprietors 839,482 Farm 251 ,965 (except education & hospitals) -293 Nonfarm 5,335,698 Specialty Hospitals -517 _ _ Private 4,568,160 76,220 43,972 5,819 84.3% 11 Agri, Forestry, Fishing, etc.* 37,329 3,521 34,528 216 3.9% 21 Mining 527,163 6,048 77,438 163 6.7% 22 Utilities 31999 _ 300 77,135 30 0.3% Growing/Declining Occupations 23 Construction 626,441 8,243 51 ,607 798 9.1 % (Change in Jobs 2010-2014) 31 -33 Manufacturing 660,228 11 ,471 42,982 296 12.7% 42 Wholesale Trade 294,970 3,702 59,115 447 4.1 % Growing Occupations Jobs 44-45 Retail Trade 337,648 8,721 28,050 600 9.6% Service Unit Operators, Oil/Gas +1 ,022 48-49 Transportation & Warehousing 239,194 3,236 51 ,111 346 3.6% Heavy & Tractor-Trailer Drivers +940 51 Information 46,826 671 44,685 70 0.7% _ Construction Laborers +693 52 Finance and Insurance 239.810 2,994 57,675 324 3.3% 53 Real Estate/Rental and Leasing 59,098 1 ,072 41 ,013 227 1 .2% 54 Professional,Technical Service 192,624 2,263 55,114 636 2.5% Declining Occupations Jobs _55 Mgmt of Companies/Enterprises 196,134 _ 1 ,294 111 ,587 42 _ 1 .4%_ 56 Administrative, Waste Services 189,514 5,549 30,649 328 6.1 % - Medical Assistants -42 61 Educational Services 17,252 6,654 33,307 80 7.4%- Registered Nurses -55 62 Health Care, Social Assistance 475,862 7,931 44,271 424 8.8% 71 Arts, Entertainment, Recreation 21 ,950 _ 777 16,975 73 0.9% - Source: EMSI 72 Accommodation, Food Services 123,473 6,508 14,198 396 7.2% 81 Other Services, exc Public Adm. 250,645 1 ,922 30,357 391 2.1 % N/A Public Admin, Gov Enterprises 767,538 4,651 43,877 74 5.1 % 2014 Estimated Employment by 20 Most Concentrated Occupations with Wage Information Source: EMS!, QCEW Employees 02/2014; Note: Bold Occupations are the five fastest growing from 2010-2014 SOC Occupation Description 2014 Jobs (1/0 All National Location Med Hr Avg Hr Occupations Quotient Wage Wage 41 -0000 Sales & Related Occupations _ 17,513 13.02 0.98 $14.25 $15.62 43-0000 Office & Administrative Support Occupations 15,104 11 .26 0.82 $15.20 $15.97 47-0000 Construction & Extraction Occupations 13,313 9.90 1.83 $19.04 $19.48 11 -0000 Management Occupations 10,855 8.07 1 .23 $25.06 $27.00 51 -0000 Production Occupations 9,578 7.12 1 .38 $14.91 $15.87 53-0000 Transportation & Material Moving Occupations 8,950 6.65 1 .07 $16.17 $17.04 _ 35-0000 Food Preparation and Serving Related Occupations 7,924 5.89 0.91 $9.39 $9.70 25-0000 Education, Training & Library Occupations 7,581 5.63 1 .11 $19.46 $20.48 13-0000 Business & Financial Operations Occupations 7,077 5.26 0.93 $26.05 $27.12 37-0000 Building/Grounds Cleaning and Maintenance Occupations 4,886 3.63 0.90 $11 .37 $11 .82 39-0000 Personal Care and Service Occupations 4,880 3.63 0.87 $10.21 $10.49 49-0000 Installation, Maintenance and Repair Occupations 4,565 3.39 0.93 $18.12 $18.67 29-0000 Healthcare Practitioners and Technical Occupations 3,968 2.95 0.71 $32.79 $32.55 27-0000 Arts, design, Entertainment, Sports & Media Occupations 3,264 2.42 0.86 $14.86 $15.46 45-0000 Farming, Fishing & Forestry Occupations 3,007 2.23 3.66 $10.82 $11 .86 31 -0000 Healthcare Support Occupations 2,330 1 .73 0.78 $12.72 $13.05 33-0000 Protective Service Occupations 1 ,968 1 .46 0.85 $20.59 $21 .12 17-0000 Architecture and Engineering Occupations 1 ,725 1 .28 0.83 $35.28 $36.27 15-0000 Computer & Mathematical Occupations 1 ,577 1 .17 0.55 $31 .28 $31 .84 21 -0000 Community & Social Service Occupations 1 ,503 1 .11 0.90 $19.78 $21 .09 Location Quotient quantifies how concentrated an occupation is compared to the nation. The higher the number the more concentrated - US = 1.0. 499 LABOR SHEDS Central/West Weld Labor Shed 5-10-15 mile ring from Hwy. 34 Business & Hwy. 34 Bypass 2014 Estimate 5 Miles 10 Miles 15 Miles • a Con - ♦ • Total Population 113,985 137,813 186,387 4 m r j i II 1 y I. Weld 'gold n i y • • �; ••I ; .ti/ -• -_` Population 18+ 84,575 102,258 137, 183 257 • t * `\ Per Capita Income $20,068 $21 ,735 $23,814 - 1 • •. '• _ \• Med Household • ' ^��n Income $40,462 $44, 121 $50,530 • . a '91 . • ♦ .. as \ ! a ,.�._ `' ' ` ` "*"�.. :softy 2017 Estimate 5 Miles 10 Miles 15 Miles 34 a Loveland ' .251. Larirn ou ; . o Total Population 27,025 190,592 378,897 A . . .4 : a:,• Weld Count ' • Ov^c `t4 ' • ii • L. ' Population 18+ 19,810 140,084 283,036 I GO . - Eat1Kr Iii) Per Capita Income $38,287 $29,472 $32,636_ El 7 740 N a Med Household Income $82,732 $61 ,686 $67,942 • Larimer Coen • . 1.-___________ • Source: ESRI lu 4- I • eld Count , Soulder So : nty IP a • -s _--.. 77, in ' 85 o x M SOUTH WELD LABOR SHED 5-10-15 mile ring from 1-25 & Hwy.52 5 , Ea a Latimer County a 2014 Estimate 5 Miles 10 Miles 15 Miles • 1J er , _ es ' F Total Population 30,219 122,323 495,015 I , Weld Count . Population 18+ 21 ,002 87,338 363,836_ 85 ft • . . . -' 7111 I . 6,. 85 Per Capita Income _ $29, 150 $33,394 $34, 145_ • • Med Household Longmont $74,611 $77, 100 $75,167 .,�,,,, ,.,._ Income ,, SC' • • r !I 2019 Estimate 5 Miles 10 Miles 15 Miles we .d county ,A. Total Population 37,930 140, 165 537,560 •• M _`,,., i • oElio : 111 x4 t9 Population 18+ 26,285 99,937 395,644 T '77'5 '' Per Capita Income $33,087 $38,886 $39,402 fi , , •• �• �� Lataye'I"!s� • •♦•40. ^ •-' ' _ •• Blfgefon '' Medlnco Household e $82,782 $87,605 $84,389 • : 715 : d • rrl i seal ' Col 'Jr t • e . , sire? 0. -_ . . _ , \ • Source: ESRI a J 78, • 25 • u . •;En ✓ Bouldd County 74,: 11 La B infield : : III - x5 93 l L a 0 5 mi • 137.1 1 1 "'s • • . • I Jetlers9n County. "" •' 3 143,I 1 1 • • _-SLY . •_ -� ll 500 COMMUTING PATTERN 2011 2011 Top 5 Out-Commuter Destinations Top 5 In-Commuter Origins Larimer County 15,937 Larimer County 10,351 r, Boulder County 12,955 Adams County 5,069 Denver County 11 ,926 Boulder County 3,828 1.:,170 Adams County 9,000 Y - , Arapahoe County 6,741 Jefferson Count 2, 104 - t Arapahoe County 2,042 All Counties 74,170 All Counties 33,361 ,242 A, Y� . . Source: Census. Colorado DOLA, Planning & Management Regional 2, Socioeconomic Profile Most recent published statistics. MAJOR EMPLOYERS Largest Private, Non-Retail Employers (August, 2014 - based on employment number) Rank Company Product/Service Location FTE 1 JBS USA & Affiliates Protein Processing, Corporate HQ, Trucking Greeley/Weld 4,654 2 Banner Health: North CO Medical Ctr Regional Hospital, Corporate Center, Clinics Greeley/Weld 2,885 3 Vestas Wind Turbine Blade/Nacelle Mfg. Windsor/Brighton 2, 150 4 State Farm Insurance Regional Claims Center Greeley 1 ,790 5 Halliburton Energy Services Oil/Gas Development Services Fort Lupton 1 ,030 6 Select Energy Services Oil/Gas Development Services Greeley/Brighton 752 7 TeleTech Financial Services Support Center Greeley 700 8 Noble Energy Oil/Gas District Field Office Greeley 600 9 Anadarko Petroleum Oil/Gas District Field Office/Warehouse Evans/Platteville 590 10 A&W Water Services Oil/Gas Development Services Fort Lupton 500 11 Afni, Inc. Telecom Services Support Center Evans 500 12 Leed Fabrication Oil/Gas Development Services Brighton/Greeley 420 13 Carestream Health, Inc. Medical/Dental Imaging Product Manufacturing Windsor 418 14 Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations Oil/Gas Development Services Brighton/Weld 415 15 McLane Western Grocery Warehouse/Distribution Weld 415 16 Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations Oil/Gas Development Services Weld/Brighton 415 17 StarTek, Inc. Business Processing Outsourcing Services Greeley 370 18 Xerox Business Services, LLC Health Services Support Center '350FT/350sea) Greeley 350 19 Leprino Foods Cheese Processing Greeley 350 20 Colorado Premium Foods Value-Added Beef/Port Processing Greeley 325 21 Hensel Phelps Construction Co Corporate Headquarters Greeley 270 22 Advanced Forming Technologies Metal Injection Parts Manufacturing Firestone 260 23 PTI Group USA Manufacturing Remote/Portable Housing Manufacturing Johnstown 250 24 Sparton Medical Systems Medical Component Manufacturing Frederick 220 25 Aurora Organic Organic Dairy Products Processing Weld/Platteville 200 Source: Upstate Colorado Economic Development - 8/2014 1-1=> HENSEL PHELPS --- )---er Vestas Banner Health tw", Anadarke HALLIBURTON Solving C�Ii1��2D9f S,�� StarTek <.> spar-ton Petroleum Corporation lir ,, State Farm AI E 0 nuwwot.x:r COCarestream Leprino Foods Aa«r,T COMPANY O 501 KEY INDUSTRY SECTORS ( PRIMARY ) Manufacturing Sector The manufacturing sector is the largest sector in Weld and includes a wealth of companies producing a wide variety of products focused primarily in food manufacturing , wood products, chemical manufacturing , plastics/rubber products, fabricated metal products, machinery manufacturing, electrical equipment/ components, transportation equipment and miscellaneous manufacturing . Key manufacturers include: JBS, Vestas Blades & Nacelles, Carestream Health, Leprino Foods, Sparton Medical Systems, PTI Group, Advanced Forming Technologies, etc. In 2013, this sector employed 11, 471 - 12. 7% of total Weld employment and had an average earnings/job of $42, 982. Total 2012 employee earnings was $660. 2 million - 16. 8% of total Weld employee earnings. Total 2012 Gross Regional Product (GRP) for the sector was $1. 094 billion - 14% of total Weld GRP. Energy Sector (Fossil & Renewable) Shale oil mining production in 2013 had an estimated valued at $3.9 million from the 20,000+ oil/gas wells throughout Weld — the highest producing County in the state. Located in the Denver-Julesburg (DJ) Basin , the Niobrara formation is part of the Wattenburg field and has a 40+ year proven track record . The Niobrara — 7,000 feet down , is the most productive so far due to new horizontal drilling technology coupled with multi-stage hydraulic fracturing — fracking . In addition , Weld is home to two 300+ mega-watt wind farms operating with 125+ turbines each on over 60,000 acres of land in Northern Weld. In 2013, the sector employed 6. 048 - 6. 7% of all Weld employment and had an average earnings/job of $77, 438. Total 2012 employee earnings was $527. 1 million - 13. 4% of total Weld employee earnings. Total 2012 sector GRP was $843. 2 million - 10% of total Weld GRP. Health and Wellness Sector The cornerstone of Weld's growing health sector is the regional 378 bed North Colorado Medical Center (NCMC) located in Greeley. Part of the Banner System : NCMC was named "A top 100 Hospital" in the 2013 & 2014 National Truven Health Analytics report. Key NCMC services include: Head and Cancer Care, Trauma and Emergency Care, Surgical Care and Women's Health plus a full range of specialty services including a regional burn unit and hyperbaric medicine facility. Air Life of Greeley provides immediate emergency transport with a 300 mile radius. The University of Colorado Heath offers additional health options. In 2013, the sector employed 7, 931- 8. 8% of total Weld employment and had an average earnings/job of $44, 271. Total 2012 employee earnings was $475. 8 million - 12. 1 % of total Weld employee earnings. Total 2012 sector GRP was $511. 7 million - 6% of total Weld GRP. Business Services Sector (Company Management, Administrative/Back Office Support; Offering a central US location with easy access to Denver International Airport, a skilled labor force and exceptional quality of life, Weld is home to several large corporate/regional headquarters, business service centers and customer/administrative support operations. While the JBS North American Corporate HQ is the largest single employer in this sector other important players include State Farm Insurance Regional Operations Center, Animal Health Inter- national, Banner Health Corporate Center, Hensel Phelps Corporate HQ, Xerox, TeleTech, StarTek, Afni, etc. . In 2013, these two sectors together employed 6, 843 - 7. 5% of total Weld employment. The Company Management Sector had an average earnings/job of $111, 587 and Administrative/ Business Services was $30, 649. Together, total 2012 employee earnings was $385. 6 million — 9. 8% of total Weld employee earnings. Combined sectors total 2012 GRP was $461. 2 million - 6 % of total Weld GRP. Agriculture Sector Weld is an agriculture empire with 1 .9 million acres devoted to farming and raising livestock. With total market value of ag products sold at $1 .86 billion; Weld ranked 1St in Colorado and 9th in the nation in the most recent 2012 US Census of Agriculture. Weld continues to be the only county outside of California to consistently rank in the top ten. The bulk - $1 .4 billion of market value came from livestock sales. Weld is home to two of the largest cattle feeding operations in the nation and ranks 1St in sheep/lamb production . About half of the dairy cows in the state are also located in Weld . Cattle ranching, goat, hog, poultry and equine operations abound and key crops include: hay, wheat, corn , nursery stock, sunflowers, dry beans, onions and carrots. The impact of agriculture extends from the traditional farm production of commodities to large agribusiness/food manufacturing operations processing value-added consumer goods exported all over the world. In 2013, the sector employed 3, 521 — 3. 9% of total Weld employment and had an average earnings/job of $34, 528. Total 2012 employee earnings was $37. 3 million - . 09% of total Weld employee earnings. Total sector 2012 GRP was $366. 9 million - 5% of total Weld GRP. Source: BEA, EMSI: GRP measures final market value of all goods and services produced in a region or sector and is the sum of earnings. property income and taxes on production. It does not include actual production value. 502 Weld Public School District K- 12 EDUCATION 2013-14 Enrollment Weld County is served by 13 public school districts with total 2013-14 student enrollment of 48,721 , which includes numerous charter Gilcrest/Platteville RE-1 1 ,922 schools. There are also ten private school education opportunities St. Vrain Valley RE-1J 9, 117 throughout Weld County. (Dacono, Erie, Mead, Firestone, Frederick Estimates) Eaton RE-2 1 ,837 Weld K-12 Public Education Statistics Keenesburg RE-3J 2,306 Most Recent Available School Year — Average of 13 Weld Districts Windsor RE-4 4,821 Weld Enrollment 2013-14 48,721 CO Stats Johnstown/Milliken RE5J 3,548 Number of Schools 2013-14 94 Greeley/Evans RE-6 20,450 Classroom Teacher FTE 2013- 14 2 ,793 Platte Valley (Kersey) RE-7 1 ,094 Pupil/Teacher Ratio 2013- 14 17.2 / 1 17.8 / 1 Fort Lupton RE-8 2,415 Dropout Rate (High 2012- 13 0 0 Ault-Highland RE-9 765 School) 1 .58% 2.91 /o Briggsdale RE-10 162 Prairie RE-11 196 Completer Rate 2012- 13 89. 39% 79. 55% RE Pawnee RE-12 88 Graduation Rate 2012- 13 87. 78% 76.93% ACT Composite Score 2013 18.26 19.45 Source: Colorado Department of Education Source: Colo Dept. of Education. Note: lncudes Weld schools in RE1J District. HIGHER EDUCATION University of Northern Colorado (UNC) Public Higher Education Facilities in Fall 2013 Enrollment - 12,084 Northern Colorado and Metro Denver __ UNC offers a comprehensive baccalaureate and Fall 2013 specialized graduate research Liberal Arts education Four Year Public Colleges/Universities Enrollment through their six colleges: Education & Behavioral Colorado School of Mines — Golden 5,680 Science; Humanities & Social Science; Natural & Health Science; Performing & Visual Arts; Monfort College of Colorado State University — Fort Collins 31 ,514 Business and University College. In 2013, The College Metropolitan State University - Denver 22,316 Database ranked UNC 12th in the nation on its list of "39 University of Colorado - Boulder 29,839 Colleges with Psychology at Their Core" and ranked University of Colorado - Denver 14,023 UNC 44th in the nation in "Top US Colleges and University of Northern Colorado - Greeley 12,084 Universities for teaching Education. The Monfort College of Business graduating students routinely test in the top Two Year Public Colleges 10% in the country and the School of Music Zazz and Aims Community College — Greeley, Ft. 5,017 Symphony Orchestra have received numerous national Lupton, Loveland "Best in Class" awards. Top 5 Undergraduate Degrees Arapahoe Community College - Littleton 9,778 Awarded: Interdisciplinary Studies (includes Elementary Community College of Aurora 7,854 Ed); Business Administration ; Dietetics; Psychology and Community College of Denver 10,423 English Language. Top 5 Graduate Degrees Awarded : Front Range Community College — Fort Collins 4,401 Special Education ; Music; Reading ; Educational Red Rocks Community College — Lakewood 8,608 Leadership and Nursing . For more info see Source: Individual Schools WWW.UnCO.edU. 2013 Weld/Larimer Aims Community College Top Education Program Completions Fall 2013 Enrollment — 5,017 Program Number With two Weld campus locations, Aims offers 160+ Business, Management, Marketing & Related 1 ,477 degree and certificate programs. Each academic Health Professions & related programs 1 ,359 division of the college represents the integration of Social Sciences 716 academics (liberal arts & science) and career and Education 661 technical education (vocational/occupations training ). Biological & Biomedical Science 651 Two-Year Degrees Awarded - Associate of Arts, Parks, Recreation, Leisure & Fitness Studies 605 Associate of Science, Associate of General Studies, Family & Consumer Sciences/Human Sciences 544 Associate of Applied Science plus numerous Career and Communication, Journalism & Related Programs 518 Technical Education Certificates. For more info see Visual and Performing Arts 499 www.aims.edu. Psychology 486 Source: EMSI 503 UTILITY PROVIDERS Major Electricity Providers Service Area Rate Info Xcel Energy Central/West Weld www.xcelenergy. com Poudre Valley REA Central/West & North/East Weld www. poudrevalleyrea.com United Power, Inc. South Weld www. unitedpower.com Major Gas Providers Atmos Energy Central/West Weld www.atmosenergy.com Xcel Energy Central/West Weld www.xcelenergy.com Source Gas South Weld www.sourcegas.com Water/Sewer Providers Water is available for purchase from municipalities throughout the county who typically provide water treatment/delivery services within municipal boundaries. In addition, there are several water districts that partner with communities and/or can provide raw water. Water rates will vary depending upon location and provider. Sewer services are also provided by municipalities in the most developed areas. Saint Vrain Sanitation District provides services in much of Southwest Weld. Septic and/or packaged systems can also be viable in the most rural circumstances and locations. Rates will vary depending upon location and provider. COMMERCIAL/ INDUSTRIAL REAL ESTATE Commercial/industrial real estate opportunities can be Weld Industrial/Commercial Business Parks found throughout Weld County to meet virtually any Name Acres Location business need from an existing building to developed Bellmore Farms Industrial Park 15 Nunn sites for construction, including available lots in the - Bear Industrial Park 18 Frederick industrial business parks listed to the right. Dacono Gateway Center 130 Dacono Real estate prices will vary widely depending upon the Diamond Valley Business Park 23 Windsor level of development and location within the County. Eagle Business Park 133 Frederick Erie Aero Tech Center 56 Erie 7/2013-6/2014 Weld Eaton Hickman Industrial Park 50 Eaton Commercial/Industrial Sales Trend Information Falcon Point Business Park 32 Windsor # Total $ Avg Sold Avg Avg Fossil Business Park 27 Milliken Sales Volume Size $/SF Cap Great Plains Village 138 Johnstown Office 33 $140 M 35,514 sf $119.86 7.74% - Industrial 80 122 M 26,959 sf 57.50 10.59% Great Western Industrial Park 500 Windsor Retail 58 44 M 6,673 sf 114.45 7.31 %___ Highpoint Business Center 136 Greeley Land — 41 22 M 46.47 a 0.45 1-25 Business Park 77 Weld (Mead) Indus/Mixed _ 1-25 Gateway Center 146 Johnstown Land — 6 3 M 8.45 a 1 .48 Industrial/Motor Sports Park 700 Lochbuie Office/Retail Source: Xceligent/Northem Colo Commercial Area Realtors - Weld Sales _ Lost Creek Commons 74 Keenesburg Niobrara Data Center/Energy Park 662 Weld (North) Northland Industrial Park 432 Fort Lupton 7/2013- 7/2014 Weld Platteville Energy Park 45 I Platteville Commercial/Industrial Lease Rates Promontory Business Park 200 Greeley # of NNN Asking Asking Asking Sandstone Ridge Business Park 28 Frederick Leases Low/sf High/sf Avg /sf Silver Peaks Business Park 148 Dacono Executed NNN NNN NNN Office 27 $8.00 $20.77 $12.31 St NoCo Industrial Park 45 Nunn Industrial 18 3.75 15.50 7. 14 Stonegate Industrial Park 25 Evans Retail 29 6.00 22.00 11 .97 The Grainery Park 156 Greeley Source: Xceligent/Northem Colo Commercial Area Realtors - Weld Leases Windsor Commons Industrial 12 Windsor Union Colony Industrial Park 112 Weld (Greeley) Weld Industrial Park 100 Weld (Peckhaml) i 504 TAXES Sales & Use Tax Weld County DOES NOT asses a county-wide sales/use Residential Property Tax tax. Communities through the county charge sales/use Residential property is assessed at 7.96% of the actual tax rates ranging from 2%-4% (see Weld Sub Region value and is exempt from personal property taxation. section for community list). Colorado has a 2.9% sales/use tax rate. State Income Tax — Corporate & Personal The corporate and personal Colorado income tax rate is Real & Personal Property Tax a flat rate of 4.63% of federal taxable income. Local Industrial/commercial property (building, land and governments DO NOT assess income taxes. equipment) is assessed for property tax purposes at Inventories, Goods in Transit and Intangibles are not 29% of actual value (based on a variety of factors). The taxed in Colorado and there is no Franchise Tax. mill levy assigned to each property location includes the taxing jurisdictions serving that location and represents Colorado has established Enterprise Zones (EZ) that the number of dollars, or property taxes, levied for each offer state income tax credits. Companies that locate or $1 ,000 of assessed value. For example; with a mill levy expand within the physical boundaries of an EZ are of 75.7333 mills the owner pays $75.73 in taxes for eligible to earn a variety of state income tax credits every $1 ,000 in assessed value. Weld has over 3,000 based on their specific activities primarily in equipment unique tax areas with mill levies ranging from about 54 investment, job creation/training , research and mills to 148 mills. The 2013 Weld County average total development activities, etc. Earned credits are applied to mill levy rate was 67.800 mills. Property taxes fund local the company's Colorado income tax liability. Select Weld schools, special propose districts and a portion of locations/communities have EZ designation . Go to city/county government. www.upstatecolorado.org for program details. Source: Weld County Government. Colorado Division of Property Taxation, Colorado Department of Revenue BUSINESS ASSISTANCE Weld County and its communities are pro-growth , prepared to handle company needs and will do what can reasonably be done to reduce the development/start-up costs of qualifying primary sector companies looking to locate/expand. Key Assistance/Incentives Include: • Municipal Development Incentives • Personal Property Tax Partial Rebate • Weld Employment Service recruitment/training assistance and training grants • Financing through the Weld/Larimer Revolving Loan Fund or Greeley Development Fund • Greeley/Weld EZ State Income Tax Credits • Colorado First Customized Training Grants • Colorado Job Growth Incentive State Income Tax Credit OR Colorado Strategic Fund Grant For more detailed assistance information contact Upstate Colorado Economic Development, a private, non-profit economic development agency, that serves as a single confidential source of information about the Weld region . Upstate maintains information concerning communities, real estate, labor, etc., and can coordinate/facilitate customized local, county and state government economic incentive packages. IC UPSTATECOLORADO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Supporting Job Opportunities in Greeley & Weld County Communities 970.356.4565 phone • 970.352.2436 fax • 822 Seventh Street, Suite 550, Greeley, CO 80631 www.upstatecolorado.org 505 a 18617 4 xt,�- mon trEini I Ma:sia. :Isumi) I I I I I I I ItSfr J:*> 506 COLORADO 'S LARGEST TEN COUNTY BUDGET COMPARISONS FOR THE PRIOR YEAR The Colorado 's Largest Ten County Budget Comparison for the Prior Year is a collection of data and graphs produced by the ten largest counties in Colorado. The data is based on adopted budgets, as provided by participating counties. Budget information is readily available to all citizens in each county. This compilation helps identify similarities and differences between participating counties. It is important to note that these are not exact comparisons. Therefore, further investigation and analysis is required to make comparisons. Out of Colorado's largest ten counties Weld County compares as follows : • Largest county geographically at 3,999 square miles • Ranks eight in population with a population of 263,746 • Weld County is the only large county with NO sales tax • Weld County is the only large county with NO debt • Weld County has the eighth lowest mill levy at 16.804 mills • Weld County ranks fourth lowest in budget amount per capital at $900.94 • In per capital for local tax costs Weld County per residential parcel ranks third lowest at $192.51 • Weld County ranks seventh lowest in total FTE at 1,369 507 10-County Budget Survey - 2014 Population Distribution ❑ Tot.al Population ❑ TTnincorporated Population 700,000 600,000 - 500,000 - — s 400,000 1 o r�� a 300,000 200,000 - IL I 100,000 _,_ Adams Arapahoe Boulder Douglas El Paso Jefferson Lai-inter Mesa Pueblo Weld County Adams Arapahoe Boulder Douglas El Paso Jefferson Larimer Mesa Pueblo Weld Total Population 475,956 614,068 309,875 303,339 666,500 546,653 322,437 151,304 0 263,746 Unincorporated 90,092 89,593 44,837 177,415 176,000 191,999 68,740 70,950 0 43,776 Population 508 10-County Budget Survey - 2014 Taxable Assessed Value by Type © Re Die nti.al ❑ Co Commercial O .vacant Land ❑ ti:ziculbue 100% ' I 1-1-111 I 90 I I I 1 7080Y I I I I I I I ,� 7010 a 60% 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 60 -450% 11 1 1 I I 1 c-. 40% F. I I I I I I I I I I 30°,a a I I 20% I 10% I 0% Adams Arapahoe Boulder Douglas El Paso Jefferson Larimer Mesa F4aeblc' Weld County Adams Arapahoe Boulder Douglas El Paso Jefferson Larimer Mesa Pueblo Weld Residential 1,968 3,783 3,171 2,697 3,491 4,123 2,266 735 0 1 , 125 Commercial 1,984 2,696 2,182 1,262 2,259 2,578 1,610 675 0 1 ,161 Vacant Land 124 192 152 213 291 187 184 92 0 67 Agriculture 25 14 14 17 13 33 20 27 0 141 509 10-County Budget Survey - 2014 Revenue Sources o Current Property Taxes O Specific Ownership Tax O Sales and Use Tax ❑ Highway Users Tax D All Federal tate Municipal Grants O Charges fin Ser,-ices ❑ Interest/Investment Earnings 100% I e I , I 90% I 1 I I 80% , I I I L a. 1 I I I I I dr. A ■ ■ I I I . a 20% ■ ■ ■ 10% I I I I 0% Adana A rap alto e Boulder Douglas El Paso Jefferson Lasimer Mesa Pueblo Weld County Adams Arapahoe Boulder Douglas El Paso Jefferson Larimer Mesa Pueblo Weld Current 27.9% 49.6% 57.9% 48.6% 18.5% 51 .2% 43.9% 16.8% 0.0% 59.7% Property Taxes Specific 1 .9% 3. 1% 2.9% 3.5% 2.0% 3.6% 3.1% 2.2% 0.0% 3.7% Ownership Tax Sales and 8.7% 6.7% 14.4% 22.2% 41.9% 11 .5% 12.8% 21 .9% 0.0% 0.0% Use Tax Highway 1 .8% 2.9% 2.3% 3.2% 4.9% 3.7% 3.5% 5.6% 0.0% 4.8% Users Tax All Federal/State/ 48.2% 28.4% 17. 1% 7.0% 24.5% 19.9% 20.6% 37. 1% 0.0% 21 .8% Municipal Grants Charges 10.9% 8.7% 5.3% 15.0% 8.4% 9.7% 15.7% 16.2% 0.0% 9.2% for Services Interest/Investment 0.5% 0.7% 0.2% 0.6% 0.0% 0.4% 0.4% 0.1% 0.0% 0.7% Earnings 510 10-County Budget Survey - 2014 Primary Sources of Revenues • Current Property Taxes ❑ Sale: and Use T.� • All Federal/State/Municipal Grants ❑ Charges for Services $500,000,000.00 $400,000,000.00 — $300,000,000.00 Q A $200,000,000.00 - $100,000,000.00 $0.00 Adams Arapahoe Boulder Douglas El Paso Jefferson Latimer Mesa Pueblo Weld County Adams Arapahoe Boulder Douglas El Paso Jefferson Larimer Mesa Pueblo Weld Current Property $124,266,000 $140,520,000 $142,057,000 $104,525,000 $44,060,000 $185,217,000 $92,856,000 $22,278,000 $0 $117,874,000 Taxes Sales and Use Tax $38,899,000 $18,976,000 $35,268,000 $47,710,000 $99,769,000 $41,729,000 $27,036,000 $29,055,000 $0 $0 All Federal/State/ $214,821,000 $80,332,000 $42,067,000 $15,011,000 $58,332,000 $71,987,000 $43,507,000 $49,285,000 $0 $43,016,000 Municipal Grants Charges for $48,593,000 $24,629,000 $13,071,000 $32,179,000 $19,915,000 $35,189,000 $33,295,000 $21,502,000 $0 $18,218,000 Services 511 10-County Budget Survey - 2014 Primary Revenue Sources (Normalized to Population) ■ Property Taxes per Capita O SOT per Capita ! All Grants per Capita O Charges fbr Services per Capita $900.00 $800.00 - $700.00 - $600.00 — ns (-' $500.00 - C, Is400.00 _ $300.00 - $200.00 - - $100.00 - $0.00 Adams Arapahoe Boulder Douglas El Paso Jefferson Larimer Mesa Pueblo Weld Adams Arapahoe Boulder Douglas El Paso Jefferson Larimer Mesa Pueblo Weld Property Taxes per $261 .09 $228.83 $458.43 S344.58 $ 66. 11 $338.82 $287.98 $ 147.24 $ 0.00 $446.92 Capita SOT per Capita $ 18.22 $ 14.44 $ 22.75 $ 24.48 $ 7.01 $ 23.98 $ 20.30 $ 19.66 $ 0.00 $ 27.68 All Grants per Capita $451 .35 $ 130.82 $ 135.75 $ 49.49 $ 87.52 $131 .69 $134.93 $325.73 $ 0.00 $163.10 Charges for Services $102.10 $ 40. 11 $ 42. 18 $106.08 $ 29.88 $ 64.37 $103.26 $142.11 $ 0.00 $ 69.07 per Capita 512 10-County Budget Survey - 2014 Parcel Counts 0 Land Parcels 0 Residential Improved Land Parcel 0 Commercial/Industrial Land Parcels 300,000 250,000 - 200,000 - h) 150,000 - IIII w 100,000 - I 4 50,000 - min asion 0 IIIL IlL I I I I I `= Adapts Arapahoe Boulder L'ougls El Paso Jefferson Larimer Mesa Pueblo Weld Count y Adams Arapahoe Boulder Douglas El Paso Jefferson Larimer Mesa Pueblo Weld Land Parcels 166,827 210,496 124,337 239,150 264,019 236,592 151,679 83,320 0 188,738 Residential Im- 122,772 187,504 102,654 106,362 200,009 188,692 107,295 49,774 0 98,200 proved Land Parcels Commercial/ 4,794 6,248 4,977 8,626 7,670 6,992 5,808 4,060 0 7,506 Industrial Land Parcels 513 10-County Budget Survey - 2014 Property Tax per Parcel ❑ Property Tax Revenue per Land Parcel ❑ Property Tax Revenue per Residential Land Parcel 1,200 1,000 - Tut 0. 800 a 600 Y, H t 400 - a. 200 0 1 Adams Arapahoe Boulder Douglas El Paso Jet3er;'_,n Larn ner Mesa Pueblo Weld County Adams Arapahoe Boulder Douglas El Paso Jefferson Larimer Mesa Pueblo Weld Property Tax $ 748.42 $ 619.53 $ 1 , 176.24 $ 3.87 $ 185.38 $ 0.00 $ 601 .05 $ 267.33 S 0.00 $ 624.57 Revenue per Land Parcel Property Tax $ 430.41 $ 351.84 $ 790.63 $ 501 .41 $ 135.53 $ 564.75 $ 475.76 $ 181. 14 $ 0.00 $ 192.51 Revenue per Residential Land Parcel 514 10-County Budget Survey - 2014 Citizens Served per County Employee 350 300 - F 250 - a 1200 _ 150 - V 100 - 50 - 0 Adams Arapahoe Boulder Douglas El Paso Jefferson Larimer Mesa Pueblo Weld County Adams Arapahoe Boulder Douglas El Paso Jefferson Larimer Mesa Pueblo Weld Citizens 251 310 196 285 276 186 194 153 0 193 Served per Employee 515 10-County Budget Survey - 2014 Support Functions per 1 ,000 Employees ❑ HR FTE'i per 1,000 ❑ RI,k Me-int FTE' per 1,000 O IT FTE's per 1,000 50 40 - O30 0 v w 1Z 20 - — LI 10 - L0 I I I Adams Arapahoe Boulder Douglas El Paso Jefferson Larimer Mesa Pueblo Weld County Adams Arapahoe Boulder Douglas El Paso Jefferson Larimer Mesa Pueblo Weld HR FTE's per 7.4 7.1 7.0 6.8 8.7 6.6 8.1 6.1 0.0 5.1 1,000 Risk Mgmt 1.1 2.0 2.5 0.9 0.0 1 .4 1.7 1.0 0.0 0.0 FTE's per 1,000 IT FTE's per 23.2 29.8 35.4 48.3 26.9 24.2 32.5 29.4 0.0 25.6 1 ,000 516 10-County Budget Survey - 2014 Finance Support Functions per 1 ,000 Employees ❑ Accounting & Reporting FTE's per 1,000 ❑ Payroll FTE's per 1,000 O Budget FTE's per 1,000 O Purchasing FTE's per 1,000 18 16 - 14 - 12 - - 0 0 210 - a, a a N p 8 - 6 4 MI • . lwr 0 I 1 Ti I 1 1 1 Adams Arapahoe Boulder Douglas El Paso Jefferson Larimer Mesa Pueblo Weld County Adams Arapahoe Boulder Douglas El Paso Jefferson Larimer Mesa Pueblo Weld Accounting & 9.0 8.6 10.8 6.6 17.4 5.4 7.5 4. 1 0.0 3.7 Reporting FTE's per 1 ,000 Payroll FTE's per 1 . 1 1 .0 1 .9 1 .9 1 .2 1.2 2. 1 1 .0 0.0 0.7 1,000 Budget FTE's per 2.6 2.5 2.8 3.8 7.5 2.2 1 .2 1 .0 0.0 0.7 1,000 Purchasing FTE's 3.7 2.0 1 .6 1 .9 2.9 2.7 2.4 1 .0 0.0 1 .5 per 1,000 517 10-County Budget Survey - 2014 Planning & Zoning and Building Inspection FTE per 10,000 Unincorporated Population Planning & Zoning FTE's per 10,000 O Building Inspection FTE's per 10,000 5 .24 a b o3J o2 - w 0 a r' Adams Arapahoe Boulder Douglas El Paso Jefferson Earthier Men Pueblo Weld Ccnntt'r Adams Arapahoe Boulder Douglas El Paso Jefferson Larimer Mesa Pueblo Weld Planning & Zoning 1 .4 2.0 4.2 1 .7 1 .3 2. 1 2.9 1 .4 0.0 3.0 FTE's per 10,000 Building Inspection 0.9 1 .8 3.3 1 .6 0.0 1 .4 1 .5 1 . 1 0.0 2.5 FTE's per 10,000 518 10-County Budget Survey - 2014 Treasurer FTE per 100,000 Population/100,000 Tax Notices fa Treasurer FTE's per 100,000 Population 0 Treasurer FTE's per 100,000 Tax Notices 10 9 - 8 �o 7 - O co "o o g _ c.. w 5 - PI r 1-. 3 - rrr ii 2 _ I I I r I I I I I I I I I I _I I I I I I o Adams Arapahoe Boulder Douglas El Paso Jefferson Larimer Mesa Pueblo Weld County Adams Arapahoe Boulder Douglas El Paso Jefferson Larimer Mesa Pueblo Weld Treasurer 2.3 3.6 3.9 3.6 2.9 2.4 4.2 4.6 0.0 3.8 FTE's per 100,000 Population Treasurer 6.4 9.8 9.9 8.2 7.7 6.0 9.1 8.6 0.0 5.5 FTE's per 100,000 Tax Notices 519 10-County Budget Survey - 2014 Assessor FTE per 100,000 Population/10,000 Parcels O Assessor FTE's per 100,000 Population O Assessor FTE's per 10,000 Parcels 18 16 - 14 - 12 - _N W 10 ►1 N Q N 8 - N A 6 4 2 0 Adams Arapahoe Boulder Douglas El Paso Jefferson Larimer Mesa Pueblo Weld County Adams Arapahoe Boulder Douglas El Paso Jefferson Larimer Mesa Pueblo Weld Assessor FTE's 9.5 10.3 14.7 14.2 7.8 9.7 13.3 16.2 0.0 12.9 per 100,000 Population Assessor FTE's 2.7 3.0 3.7 1 .8 2.0 2.2 2.8 2.9 0.0 1 .8 per 10,000 Parcels 520 10-County Budget Survey - 2014 Clerk & Recorder FTE per 100,000 Population ® Elections FTE's per 100,000 Population 0 Adnun & Clerk FTE's per 100,000 Population ■ Recording FTE's per 100,000 Population 0 Motor Vehicle FTE's per 100,000 Population 25 70 - — 1. 15 - w • , I 1 I n .. Adams Arapahoe Boulder Douglas El Paso Teffer;on Latimer Mesa Pueblo 'Weld (_Cnunt V Adams Arapahoe Boulder Douglas El Paso Jefferson Larimer Mesa Pueblo Weld Elections FTE's per 3.2 2.4 3.4 3.5 1 .5 2.9 3.6 3.3 0.0 1 .9 100,000 Population Admin & Clerk FTE's 0.2 1 .4 1 .8 1 .9 4.8 2.0 3.3 2.0 0.0 1 .1 per 100,000 Population Recording FTE's per 2.0 2.3 4.2 2.6 2.0 3. 1 4.3 4.0 0.0 3.0 100,000 Population Motor Vehicle FTE's 12.6 13.7 14.0 10.5 11 .0 12.0 13.6 13.2 0.0 13.3 per 100,000 Population 521 10-County Budget Survey - 2014 Clerk Motor Vehicle FTE per 100,000 Vehicle Registrations 20 I 15 — (FW t; 10 - O O �I V 5 - 0 Adams Arapahoe Boulder Douglas El Paso Jefferson Larimer Mesa Pueblo Weld County Adams Arapahoe Boulder Douglas El Paso Jefferson Larimer Mesa Pueblo Weld Clerk Motor 13.6 16.2 18.3 11 . 1 14.2 13.6 11 .2 10.9 0.0 6.4 Vehicle FTE per 100,000 Vehicle Registrations 522 10-County Budget Survey - 2014 District Attorney FTE per 100,000 Population 35 30 - 25 - - _N W 20 - E Zas 115 - 4 A 10 - 5 - — — 0 T s min Adams Arapahoe Boulder Douglas El Paso Jefferson Larimer Mesa Pueblo Weld County Adams Arapahoe Boulder Douglas El Paso Jefferson Larimer Mesa Pueblo Weld District Attorney 34.0 33.5 21 .0 0.0 30.2 31 .9 22.2 30. 1 0.0 21 . 1 FTE's per 100,000 Population 523 10-County Budget Survey - 2014 Sheriff Office FTE per 100,000 Population W Sheriff FTE's per 100,000 Population 0 Detention FTE's per 100,000 Population • Administration FTE's per 100,000 Population 160 140 - 120 - 100 - _N 80 El El 60 — 40 •- 20 — 0 Adams Arapahoe Boulder Douglas El Paso Jefferson Larimer Mesa Pueblo Weld County Adams Arapahoe Boulder Douglas El Paso Jefferson Larimer Mesa Pueblo Weld Sheriff FTE's per I 1 1 .3 114.3 116.5 149.8 l 11 .9 150.5 115.2 149.4 0.0 135. 1 100,000 Population Detention FTE's per 56.4 66.4 51 .3 47. 1 57.5 61 .8 55.5 63.4 0.0 91 .8 100,000 Population Administration FTE's 13.4 7.3 9.6 16.5 8.9 22.2 15.2 9.3 0.0 8.3 per 100,000 Population 524 10-County Budget Survey - 2014 Sheriff Patrol FTE per 100,000 Unincorporated Population 180 160 - 140 - 120 - _N W 100 - 80 - 60 - 40 - 20 - 0 Adams Arapahoe Boulder Douglas El Paso Jefferson Latimer Mesa Pueblo Weld County Adams Arapahoe Boulder Douglas El Paso Jefferson Larimer Mesa Pueblo Weld Sheriff Patrol 137. 1 62.5 113.7 70.7 86.9 91 .7 108.7 118.4 0.0 177.6 FTE's per 100,000 Unincorporated Population 525 Hello