The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20141062.tiff Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 1 of 6 PA-08-CO-0145-PW-00897(0) P Applicant Name: Application Title: WELD(COUNTY) WELCO35-Weld County Road Culverts Period of Performance Start: Period of Performance End: 09-14-2013 03-14-2015 Bundle Reference#(Amendment#) Date Awarded • Subgrant Application - FEMA Form 90-91 Note:The Effective Cost Share for this application is 75% FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY PROJECT WORKSHEET DISASTER PROJECT NO. PA ID NO, DATE CATEGORY WELCO35 123-99123- 04-15-2014 C FEMA 4145 I- DR -CO 00 APPLICANT:WELD(COUNTY) WORK COMPLETE AS OF: 02-12-2014:95% Site lofl • DAMAGED FACILITY: COUNTY: Weld • Weld County Road Culverts LOCATION: LATITUDE: LONGITUDE: 40.39227 -104.63988 Current Version: 40.33815 -104.76958 40.85554 -104.82422 • There were a series of 8 culverts,located on the Weld County road network,that were damaged by 40.85577 -104.81496 flood waters.These culverts were distributed across the county. 40.18953 -104.89123 40.18953 -104.89043 40.25256 -104.87827 40.25666 -104.87939 40.34852 -104.73439 40.35335 -104.77502 40.3539 -104.77078 40.71532 -104.84987 40,34179 -104.78378 40.08921 a104.86768 40.06412 -104.84849 40.34167 -104.78908 DAMAGE DESCRIPTION AND DIMENSIONS: Current Version: During the incident period of September 11 and September 30,2013,torrential rains resulted in raging torrents across Weld County,spilling flood water from the South Platte River and nearby streams,creeks and reservoirs,Inundating the roads and bridges throughout the County.This flooding resulted in widespread damages to the Weld County road system.Damages included erosion of the roadway, • shoulders,culvert washouts, culvert separations and loss of the gravel riding surfaces.At paved locations there was minor damage to the pavement surface.Originally there were 12 damage locations inspected by the project specialist.Those original 12 locations have been reduced to 8 because it was found that 4 sites were being reported by other project specialists and included in their PWs.The disposition of the 4 sites is shown in this pw,however the costs for those locations are not Included in this document.This document is limited to the 8 locations.The damage to the 8 locations amounted to erosion losses of 5,867.5 tons of embankment and 2076.4 tons of gravel surfacing for a total replacement volume of 7.943.9 tons.At most locations the damage was less than 100 feet long,however,there was one location where the embankment loss was longer than 1000 feet and another where the surface gravel loss exceeded 2500 feet. Minor damage to asphalt pavement occurred at 3 sites;the longest of these sites was 81 feet.Together these 3 paved sites accounted for a loss of 59.4 tons of pavement One location featured a ditch cleaning/shaping operation of approximately 760LF.The specifics regarding the individual locations are documented In the following pages. The GPS coordinate,(40.44643,-104.70146)is for the Weld County Public Works office. Location Description, '�(',:�}[8 G'8,58), OEM, sr �,Lbd) OcmauA1 a {a- Rc,c CO•c•-)YwLEP-)04, inn;bt..) 1-2-a1A/9 5/6/I.1 aoi41- 10(02 13e,OO 2I6 • • Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 2 of 6 Location#1 EM-cul 120-25.3 GPS 40.85554,-104.82422 to 40.85577,-104.81496 The 60'dia.CMP X 49.1 pipe had to be reset The roadway embankment loss at this site was 30'W x 24'L X 7'D x 1/27=186 cy.In addition there was a continuous 24W x 2539'loss of gravel surfacing L X.25'D x 1/27=564.2 cy Location#2 EM-cu123.100.1 GPS 40.71532,-104.84987 The 30°dia CMP X 50'L pipe was undamaged.Approximately 20'had to be reset.There was a loss of embankment of approximately 2' D x 20W x 20'L x 1/27=29,6 cy.There was a loss of gravel surfacing approximately.25'D x 25'w x 30'long x 1/27=6.95 cy. Location#3 EM-cul 45-54.5-.5 GPS 40.39227,-104.63988 The 60'CMP arch pipe x 60'L was scoured at the end but did not require resetting.Embankment loss was approximately 25'W x 30'L x 4' D x1(27=111.1 cy.Asphalt pavement loss was 81'L x 22'W x 0.25'D x1/27=16.5 cy.The ditch required cleanout and reshaping for a length of 760LF. Location#4 EM-cul 394-35-0.0 GPS 40.34852,104.73439 The original 60'dia concrete pipe was separated from a 4.5'D x 8'-w x 15'L concrete box it was attached to.The concrete pipe collapsed and the concrete box was cracked.The embankment loss was 5'D x 18'W x 20'W x 1127=66.7 cy. Asphalt pavement loss was 26'L x 23'W x 0.25'Dx1/27=5.5 cy. Location#5 EM-cul—23-8-1.4 GPS 40.06412,-104.84849 The 48'L CMP arch x 50'was washed away.The embankment loss was 15'W x 12'L x 6'D x 1/27=40 cy.The loss of asphalt pavement was 19'Lx23W x 0.5'D x 1/27=8.1 cy. Location#6 EMcul-396-trp-0.9 GPS 40.34167;104.78908 The 36'dia CMP x 100'was forced apart by flood waters.It was undamaged but needed to be partially reset. The embankment loss was estimated to be 40'L x 40W x 6'D x 1/27=355.6 cy.The loss of gravel surfacing was estimated at 150'L x 24'W x 0.5'D x 1127=66.7 cy. Location #7 EM-cul-396-trp-1.3 GPs 40.34179,-104.78378 The 30°arch CMP x 40'was washed away.The loss of embankment was 30'L x 26'W x 4'dx 1/27=115.6 cy. Location#8 EM-378-396-0.1 and 0.2 GPS 40.35335,-104.77502 to 40.35390,-104.77078 The 18' arch CMP x 60'culverts at mile 0.1 and 0.2 were washed away. The embankment loss was 23W x 2'D x 1,181'L x1127=2012.1 cy.There was an additional hole in the road embankment estimated to be 9'D x 23'W x 40'L x 1/27=306.7 cy.The gravel surfacing was • washed away and was estimated to be 23'W x 1181'L x 0.5'D x 1/27=503 cy.' Summarizing the scope of repair volumes for the 8 locations results in the following table showing values in cu yds and their conversion to tons: EMBANK SURF GRVL ASPHALT • volume volume pavement • cu yds cu yds Cu yds 188.7 564.2 29.6 6.9 111.1 16.5 32.5 66.7 5.5 10.9 40.0 8.1 15.9 355.6 66.7 115.6 0.0 2012.1 503.0 306.7 0.0 3223.9 1171.0 59.4 X 1.82 X 1.82 X1.97 5867.5 TN 2076.4 TN 59.4 TN The following 4 locations were damaged and they are being reported under other project worksheets.They are listed here for informational purposes only. Location #9 EM—cul 394-31-.25 Damage at this site was within the City of Evans but was repaired by Weld County forces.The details are reported in PW EVANS 09 GPS 40.33815,-104.76958 Location #10 EM-cul-21.14-0.1 Damage at this site reported under WELCo03 GPS 40.08921,-104.86766 Location#11 EM—cul-28-17-0.6 Damage at this site reported under WELCO03 https://isource.fema.net/enunie/intemalIntegration?applicationld=355579 5/1/2014 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 3 of 6 GPs 40.18953,-10489123 to 40.18953,-104.89043 Location#12 19.5-36-0.9 23 Damage at this site reported under WELCO23 GPS 40.25666,-104.87939 to 4025256-104.87827 SCOPE OF WORK: Current Version: The county used force account labor,materials and equipment to conduct repairs to the damaged sites. These repairs consisted of hauling and placing embankment material at the damaged sites,reseting corrugated metal pipe(CMP),installing replacement culverts as needed, and replacing the surface gravel.At 3 locations the county forces replaced sections of pavement damaged by the flood. At the time of the inspections all repairs had been completed. Cost estimates for location repairs to embankments and gravel surfacing are based upon the use of Colorado DOT unit bid prices for the period Jan 1 thru March 31,2013.The project specialist used the CDOT figures as an estimating factor for validating the Weld County cost estimates.The project specialist computed the repair quantities to be 5,867.5 tons of embankment and 2076.4 tons of gravel surfacing for a combined tonnage of 7349.4tons and a cost of$238,292.70.The cost of replacing 59.4 tons of asphalt paving was estimated at$4,852.98. See the Project Notes for details regarding unit conversion factors from cubic yards(cy)to tons(tn).The project specialist obtained the cost per foot for culverts directly from the county:48°arch-$48.19;30'arch-$25.01:18'arch-$14.95.The total loss of culvert pipe was 220Lf and was comprised of the three mentioned sizes.The county reported a ditch deanout operation of approximately 760Lf for an estimated cost of$2,584..The total estimated cost of repairs is$251,933.58. The specific details regarding the repairs,quantities and costs for each site are shown on the following pages COMPLETED WORK Location#1 EM-cul 120-25.3 GPS 40.85554,-104.82422 to 40.85577,-104.81496 The county used their forces to reset the 60"dia.CMP X 49'L pipe.In addition they replaced embankment estimated at 30'W x 24'L X 7'D x 1/27=186.7cy.County forces will be replacing the lost surfacing estimated at a continuous 24W x 2539'loss of surfacing L X.25'D x1/27=564.2cy. Applying the conversion factor of 1.62,the 186.67 cu yds becomes 302.4 tons of embankment fill and and the 564.7 cy becomes 914 tons of surfacing. Surfacing @$33.70/tn x 914m=$30,803.15 Embankment©$33.70/cy x302..4=$10,190.88 Total=30,803.15+10,190.88=$40,944.03 Location #2 EM-cu123.100.1 GPS 40.71532,-104.84987 Although the 30'dia CMP X 50'L pipe was undamaged,the inlet side required approximately 20'to be reset. County forces hauled fill to repair the lost embankment estimated to be 2'D x 20W x 20'L x 1/27=29.6 cy.Converting to tons yields 1.82 x 29.6=53.9 tn.County forces replaced the lost surface gravel estimated to be 0.25'D x 25'w x 30'long x 1/27=6.95 cy.Converting to tons,6.95 cy x 1.82= 12.6TN Surfacing @$33.70/tn x 12.6tn=$425.93 Embankment @$33.70/tn x 53.9=$1817.30 Total=425.93+1817.30=$2243.23 Location#3 EM-cut 4554.5-.5 GPS 40.39227,-104.63988 The 60°arch CMP pipe x 60'L was scoured at the end but did not require reseting.County forces hauled replacement fill to repair the embankment loss of approximately 25'W x 30'L x 4'D x 1/27=111.1 cy.Converting to tons yields 1.82 x 111=202.2 tn. County paving crews were used to patch the asphalt surface of 81'L x 22'W x 0.25'D x1/27=16.5 cy.Based upon an asphalt value of 146 fticu ft yields an asphalt conversion factor of(146#/cy x 27 cu ft/co yd) /2000 Mon=1.97 T/cu yd. Convening yards to tons yields 16.25 cy x 1.97= 32.5 tn. The county forces and equipment were used to dean out and reshape the ditch for a distance of 760 Lf.FEMA cost code of $3.40/If was used to estimate the repair cost. Embankment @$33.70/tn x 202.246,814.89 Asphalt @$81.70/tn x 32.5=$2,655.66 Ditch deanout/reshape @$3.40 x 760=$2,584 Total=6,814.89+$2,655.66+$2,584=$12,054.55 Location#4 EM-cul 394-35-0.0 GPS 40.34852,-104.73439 As an immediate remedy to the flood damage,county forces removed the collapsed 60'dia concrete pipe.They grouted a 60°dia x 60f CMP to the damaged concrete box.County forces were used to replace the embankment loss of 5'D x 18'W x 20'W x 1/27=66.7 cy. Converting from cy to ton yields 66.7cy x 1.82=121.3 tn.County paving crews replaced the lost pavement in an area of 26'L x 23W x 0.25'Dx1/27=5.5 cy.Converting yds to tons yields 5.5 cy x 1.97=10.9 tn County forces placed riprap on the inlet face of the repair.The county regards this repair as a temporary measure to open the road. Asphalt@$81.70 x 10.9 tn=$891.18 Embankment C $33.70,to x 121.3=$4,088.93 Temp 60"dia.X 60ifx$13511=$8,10D Immediate repair Tota�$891.18+$4,088.93+$8,100=$13,080.11 Permanent Repair:The county reported that the immediate repairs to this location did not fully restore the site.They reported that the area near the grouted connection was undermined,resulting in subsequent settlement. In turn this led to a depression in the flow line.To correct this situation the county must reopen the original excavation,remove the pipe and the box culvert,re-establish the flowline,install a https://isource.fema.net/emmie/intemallntegration?applieationld=355579 5/1/2014 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 4 of 6 replacement pipe,backfill,pave,re-seed and mulch.The county opted to install a concrete arch pipe measuring 64'L—48°H x 76"W..The attached table from the Heidelberg Cement Group shows that the arch pipe is equivalent to the 60"dia CMP. Asa mitigation effort the county elected to rip rap both faces of the culvert,2 @ 18'W x 7 L'x 1.5'0=14 cy and install geo fabric,2 @ 10 x 10=200 sq ft/9 sq ft=22.2 sy. They will reseed two areas,10'x 100'=1000 aq ft and 20 x 42=849 sq ft,totaling 1849 sq ft.They repaved an area of 24'W x 37'L x 0.25'D/27=8.22 cy x 1.97=16.2 tn. The county hauled the asphalt pavement to their East Davis yard for recycling and the removed concrete was sent to their Hwy 14 county landfill.The 60"die CMP was removed and is salvageable.The project specialist put a value of 50%($67.50 x 60=$4050)on the pipe for a salvage price of$4050.The county coordinated their repair with the local ditch company. Permanent Repair Mobilization$1,100 Remove embankment to access old pipes(unclassified CDOT item 212-00010)=121.3cy x$14.18=$1,720 Restore embankment per the immediate original repair @$33.70/tn x 121.3=$4,088.93 Asphalt@$81.70 x 16.2tn=$1,323.54 Concrete arch=64LF x$206.90/lf=$13,241.60 Rip rap 14cy x$116/cy=$1,624 Geo fabric 22.2 sy x$3.07=$68.15 Reseed 1849 sq ft/43,560(sq ft/acre)=0.042 acre x$270/acre=$11.34 Soil blanket $1.53/sy x 22.2 sy=$33.97 Mulching 0.042 ac x$270/ac=$11.34 Total full repair=immediate+permanent-salvaged pipe=$13,080.11+$23,222.87-$4050=$32,252.98 Location#5 EM-col—23-8-1.4 GPS 40.06412,-104.84849 County forces replaced the 48°CMP arch x 50'L which had been washed away. The county repaired the damaged embankment loss of 15'W x 12'L x 6'D x 1/27=40 cy.Converting to tons yields 1.82 x 40=72.8 tn.The county repaired damage to the pavement amounting to 19'L x 23W x 0.5'D x 1/27=8.1 cy.Converting cy to tons yields 1.97 x 8.1=15.9 m. Asphalt@$81.70 x 16.1 tn=$1,302.49 Embankment @$33.70/cy x 64.8tn=$2,453.36 Culvert 48"-$48.19 x 5OLF=$2409.50 Totak1302.49+2453.36+$2409.50=$6165.32 Location#6 EM-cul-396-trp-0.9 GPS 40.34167,-104.78908 County forces were used to reconnect the bands joining the various lengths of the 36'dia CMP x 100'that were forced apart by flood waters.No new sections of culvert were required and the culvert was reset to the proper flow line. County forces replaced the damaged embankment that was estimated to be 40'L x 40'W x 6'D x 1/2Th 355.6 cy.Converting to ton yields 1.82 x 355.56 cy=647.1 tn.County forces replaced the gravel surfacing that was estimated at 150'L x 24'W x 0.5'D x 1/27=66.7 cy.Converting to tons yields 66.7 x 1.82= • • 121.3 tn. • Embankment @$33.70/tn x 647.1 cy=$21,807.64 Surfacing @$33.70/tn x 121.3 tn=$4088.93 Total=$21,807.64+4088.93=$25,896.58 Location#7 EM-cul-396-tip-1.3 • GPs 40.34179,-104.78378 The 30'arch CMP x 40'was washed away and county forces installed a replacement. County forces were used to replace the damaged embankment of 30'L x 26'Wx 4'dx 1/27=115.6 cy.Converting to tons yields 115.6cy x 1.82=210.3 tn • Embankment @$33.70/tn x210.3 tn=$7,087.11 Culvert -30°arch t.! $25.01 x 4OLF=$1000.40 Total=$7,087.11 +$1,000.40=$8,087.51 Location#8 EM-378-396-0.1 and 0.2 GPS 40.35335-104.77502 to 40.35390,-104.77078 The 18°arch CMP x 60'culverts at mile 0.1 and 0.2 were replaced by the county forces.County forces replaced the embankment loss of 23'W x 2'D x 1,181'L x1/27=2012.1 cy and the additional hole in the road embankment estimated to be 9'D x 23'W x 40'L x 1/27=306.7 cy.The combined loss was 2012.1+306.7=2318.8 cy.Converting to tons yields 2318.8 x 1.82=4220.2 tn. The gravel surfacing was replaced and estimated to be 23'W x 1181'L x 0.5'D x 1/27=503 cy.'Converting to tons yield 1.82 x 503=915.5 to.The riprap was incorporated into the fill. Embankment @$33.70/tn x 4220.2=$142,220.74 Surfacing @$33.70./tn x915.5=$30,852.14 Culverts 18"@$14.95/LF x 2 x GOLF pipe=$1,794 Total=$142,220.74+30,852.14+$1,794= $174,866.88 The following 4 locations were damaged and they are being reported under other project worksheets.They are listed here for informational purposes only. Location #9 EM—cul 394-31-.25 Repairs for this site were performed by Weld County within the City of Evans.The details are documented in the City of Evans,PW EVANS09. GPS 40.33815-104.76958 Location#10 EM-cul-21-14-0.1 Repairs for this site are documented under PW WELCO03 GPS 40.08921,-104.86766 Location#11 EM-cul-28-17-0.6 Repairs for this site are documented under PW WEL0003 GPs 40.18953,-10489123 to 40.18953,-104.89043 https://isource.fema.netemmie/intemalIntegration?applicationld=355579 5/1/2014 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 5 of 6 Location#12 19.5-36-0.9 Repairs to this location are documented under PW WELCO23 GPS 40.25666,-104.87939 to 40.25256,-104.87827 END OF SCOPE OF WORK Weld County Project Notes 1. During repair or reconstruction,applicant may incur additional costs related to clearing and grubbing,placement of topsoil,erosion and sedimentation control,sanitary facilities,dewatering,mobilization and flagging/traffic control. Such costs are generally addressed in the"in- place"unit costs of repair or reconstruction items,and not specifically addressed in the Scope of Work. However,if a project requires an extraordinary use of any such Item,to where a specific reference in the PW should be considered,applicant is advised to contact Colorado Department of Emergency Management requesting a revision to the PWs Scope of Work. 2.As described in 44 CFR Section 13.42,applicant must maintain all work-related records for a period of three(3)years from applicant closure(final payment). All records relative to this project worksheet are subject to examination and audit by the State,FEMA,and the • Comptroller General of the United States and must reflect work related to disaster specific costs. '.. 3.The applicant must obtain all required federal,state,and local permits prior to the commencement of work. 4.The subgrantee is requesting direct administrative costs that are directly chargeable to this specific project. Associated eligible work is related to administration of the PA project only and in accordance with 44 CFR 13.22. These costs are treated consistently and uniformly as direct costs in all federal awards and other subgrantee activities and are not Included in any approved indirect costs. 5.Project was reviewed for 406 Hazard Mitigation and a copy of 406 HMP proposal is attached with this project. 6.The applicant is aware that all projects are subject to an insurance review as stated in 44 C.F.R.Sections 206.252 and 206.253.If applicable,an insurance determination will be made either as anticipated proceeds or actual proceeds in accordance with the applicant's insurance policy that may affect the total amount of the project. 7.The applicant is required to adhere to State and Federal Government Procurement rules and regulations and maintain adequate records to support the basis for all purchasing of goods and materials and contracting services for projects approved under the Public Assistance program,as stated in 44 CFR 13.36.The applicant has advised they have/wIll follow their normal procurement procedures, 8.All calculated quantities have been rounded to the nearest tenth of the applicable unit,i.e.,tons,cubic yards.Minor discrepancies In quantities are the result of rounding. 9.The Weld County employee pay policy and the Weld County procurement policy are on file in EMMIE. 10.A Colorado DOT(CDOT) unit cost of$33.70/tn was used for estimating the in-place repair costs.This is twice the CDOT Item Number 304-06000 Aggregate Base Course Class 6.This cost was used because of expected economies of scale as compared to the CDOT figures. 11.The applicant expects to claim Direct Administrative Costs for this PW.The DAC charges were not available at the time of PW preparation.The project specialist added an estimate as a temporary measure to preserve the opportunity to claim DAC when the final figures become available. 12.Applicant has completed a substantial percentage of the work but will not have cost data available within the fourteen day Pocket Guide rule.Per Field Operations Pocket Guide,Section 7,Cost Estimates,Page 26,"If the applicant has not produced cost data within two weeks of the site inspection,the Project Specialist will prepare the PW on the basis of an estimate for the work accomplished".Applicant,CO State representative and FEMA personnel jointly conducted all inspections and agreed to use CDOT costs for In-place costs to derive estimates on this project worksheet.Applicant understands that all actual support documentation,invoices,FA records,contract and proof of payment will be required for final reconciliation and or closeout process.Attached is the CDOT average in-place cost for materials. 13.The applicant hauled damaged asphalt pavement to their county facility for crushing and reuse. 14.There are sites that lie within or very near the%mile radius limit of a Bald Eagle nest The applicant should contact the Colorado • Division of Wildlife to determine if the nests are active.The contact person is: Mr David Klute Bird Conservation Coordinator Colorado Division of Wildlife 6060 Broadway Denver,CO 80216 Phone 303 291 7320 E mail:david.kluteestate.co.us • END PROJECT NOTES Does the Scope of Work change the pre-disaster conditions at the site? (_!Yes Li No Special Considerations included? -_;Yes u No Hazard Mitigation proposal included? Li Yes No Is there insurance coverage on this facility? �`..,Yes ( No PROJECT COST ITEM CODE NARRATIVE QUANTITY/UNIT UNIT PRICE COST https://isource.fema.net/emmie/internallntegration?applicationld=355579 5/1/2014 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 6 of 6 "'Version 0 "` Work Completed 1 9999 Class 6 gravel fill material 7943.9/TON $ 33.70 $ 267,709.43 2 9999 Asphalt Pavement 59.4/TON $ 81.70 $4,852.98 3 9999 Direct Administrative Cost-estimated 1/LS $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 4 9999 48" arch CMP 50/LF $48.19 $2,409.50 5 9999 30"arch CMP 40/LF $25.01 $ 1,000.40 6 9999 18"arch CMP 120/LF $ 14.95 $ 1,794.00 7 9999 ditch cleanout/shaping 760/LF $ 3.40 $ 2,584.00 8 9999 Modification to Location#4-using 1/LS Total full repair solution $ 32,252.98 $32,252.98 9 0909 Hazard Mitigation Proposal 1/LS $ 10,372.24 $ 10,372.24 TOTAL $323,975.53 COST PREPARED BY STEPHEN A MORENO TITLE Project Specialist SIGNATURE APPLICANT REP.Roy Rudisil! TITLE Director-OEM SIGNATURE % ez,ergir --17-Z"-* / / https://isource.fema.net/emmie/internalIntegration?applicationld=355579 5/1/2014 Esther Gesick From: Roy Rudisill Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2014 7:36 AM To: Esther Gesick Cc: Katie Wolff; Tommy Horton Subject: FW: PW Worksheet for BOCC approval Attachments: FEMA PW Summary 31 March2014.xlsx Esther,when you view the worksheet you will see the top four PWs in red, we have not received these from FEMA. The bottom of the sheet has PW listed in bold,these have been signed and returned to FEMA.The PW's we are approving are the remaining PWs. Hope this helps and please let me know if you have any questions. Roy Director Roy Rudisill Weld County Office of Emergency Management 1150 O St. Greeley Co. 80632 970-304-6540 Office 970-381-0417 Cell T , , ca 1, N_-- L' Confidentiality Notice:This electronic transmission and any attached documents or other writings are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify sender by return e-mail and destroy the communication.Any disclosure,copying, distribution or the taking of any action concerning the contents of this communication or any attachments by anyone other than the named recipient is strictly prohibited. From: Katie Wolff[mailto:kwolff@basetactical.com] Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 8:45 PM To: Roy Rudisill Cc: 'Tommy Horton'; Esther Gesick Subject: RE: PW Worksheet for BOCC approval Here you go. Katie Wolff 1 I x vs c rI ri 0 N L U ft m 4J 2 rl 7 m .. m ` c m Co in E : C VI 0 U a v a TD 2 3 w U.- 0 in \ W I— o c Z ° m 00 .c 0 O 3 a -0 4) t E a 7 in Q 2 W w > a aMi .M-1 Cr v Cr a 00 N N00 O O \ \ \ \ N rq Q W O N N \t0 0 \ M N ti \ \ ri \ ri To N N H rl N M c N LL 0) > Vf C Q,U el el ri l el el el ,l O e co 'v 0) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' K M N N N N N N N 'j \ \ \ \ \ \ \ C V V V tD Cr V M N cC O N N N N N N N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ N O 'y m M m m m m m a S 0) K Q 2 W U. o c v d v v a v v v v v ,7 '7 a v Kr v „ v a e 4 IT 41. . ri rl rl el el el el el ri el el el el el el e-1 el ei ri ,y ~ eleli-' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 o 0 0 C N N Ni N N Ni N NN N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 'a M N O N M N N 4.0 O N O O m 0 0 N V m to m lD40 r-- y ei .y H N .-I el el N ti el el el ei e-/ ri ri 4441 \ \ �"l \ \ C \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ .- \ N \ M N 0 m m m m m m m m en m m CO m m m m m11' .--4rl N a) cc 0 H 4) N ct tr E el el N ti el e e�-I r�-1 r�i eel N r�l ~ '�-' el ti r�i .° D 0 0 0 0 0 0 CNN NNN 0 0 0 r,4 0 O NI 0 0 O co o .:72 7 ~ \ \ N \ \ \ N \ N \ N N \ N N \ \ N N N > N m N fV \ N m e l \ CD \ N \ \ M \ \ N O \ \ \ 0) of N H \ N e-1 N \ N CO '"l O\ \ �"l \ \ rl N \ \ o m m m m m m M m m m m M m N m m m m N M O O Z .y 5 as K Z.C 3 7 61 o > 17ccm m V V m m V V V V V V V V , Q V V v m v mi ,M.l Kt Q Q e-1 el r-1 e-1 el et el el el ri el el el el ei ri el el e-1 U. `O o 0 0 g 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p O O O N N O O p 3 w N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N \ \ N N N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ o 0) N CO oO m V 00 ri r, l0 c0 00 0o CO co m V a\4 ri lD r+ eM-1 .Ml lD ei m .. 4J N N N \ N N N N N N N N N N \ N \ \ N \ m -. \ \ N \ \ \ \ \ '- \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ N - N \ 7• O m N N m N N N N m N N N N N N ei m m N r♦ ri „_i l'ii rl N N o a c E CU a 1.11 E 0 w V m R Q m V V Q Q V m m m m v m m y ,my ti m a < ri ri r-1 V ri ri r-1 I-1 q-1 .--1 .-1i I-1l ri rl rl ri gar rl ri N N ri 4.1 Q 0000000r10000 �p 00 ° 2200o c N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N \ \ N N N uC \ \ \ N \ \ \ \ - \ \ \ \ \ N \ \ N \ \ \ \ \ W N N N m ' V) t O V N N V) VI N en CO in up ei ei N O CO M CJ V- N N N \ N N el N N NNN N N \ N N \ e-1 \ M \ \ \ N \ K \ \ \ m \ \ \ \ - \ \ \ \ \ N \ - m \ N \ ei ,i N \ N m N N N N N N m N N N N N ri N N N e-i ,,,1 „l r♦ N C) 4. M 0 y a a a Q a a a Q a a a a a a a a a a 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 w w w w w W w 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2C. U. U. U. � U. U. LL 0. U- LL LL LL LL LL LL U- W W W W W W W W W LU O Cr a d Cr E E E E E E E E W LL w LL W LL LL LL LL w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 y 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -o -o -0 -0 v -0 a iJ-. w W W W < w Y- y- -o U U a U U U U =. t_++ t_++ t_++ �••+ w Y_) W LL U. LL 2 -0 a 'O .0 'O U '0 'O 0) 0) a) a) a) 0) 0 0) a) 01 _ _ 4-' >- >- >. T w a) a) Ql a) T. al a) a) Z « 1n a a a a 1 > > > > > > > > E E E E E E E t -o -0 - E u U U U U u u U .n n .n _o .o n E .o .o n a a a a a a a 7 7 7 7 J 7 7 a1 a) a) O a) a) a) a) a) a1 a) a) J 7 J J 0 0 7 J J 7 to N to to In to K eK . .. 4- CC CC CC CC CC CC CC CC in In in in in in in in in in V a V no a no to m m m ..0 “) v) ..0) N N t l N Vf N N N N 0 N Vl C C C C C C C �' ,M ..0 c c c c c c c c cc c c c c c c c c m m m m nit m O O O O ≥ O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O 0 0 .O -0 -0 'D -0 -0 04:1c m 04 G4 N t/1 y in N Nlei -Ili n V V1 1 N VI N V N N ) 41 1 co 4) O! 41 4 41 . c c c — ci .>in .>>>> .> .5 .> .> .> .> .> .> .>> .> > .5 c c 000 c a O 0 'to a) 0 a) a) o a) a) al a) a) a/ a) a) a) a1 a) a) a/ a) a) 44 m 4t) 00 6a 00 40 m m m m cc cc cc cc cc cc a cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc oc cc cc cc in in in in in in 'v, To N 0 a 0 > Z in C . O CO el 0' O~1 . La OD O .--4N N K a1 01 tom N N M N m m 0 m N00 in a ' rn lD of r-i N 0e,-1 CO2NI N N N N N - NN , CO 00 00 CO CD N 0 r �— 0 0 Z r 1 1 r r 71- h I la r Li 0 0 o V"-01 N N N NO O aoc, N N )D ID O O r--. 000 N ry ei O W r. O N a N N T Y o ut N O o O V N O ul O N CO m0 CO m 00 Lei an N O 0 0 `o O o N 0lcr, N O CO O V N co O Vl Oo a VD N 0 a' M co � w w n. to 3 O 00 N 00 m o n O N co m N N M N O N e l N N � n a1 N O c N N 00 m 0 V N N N N O 0 Vt N u a1 O CO ri w min O 1n N N V) N W co c., m ri W N N N N 1 0a) en Vl rl 00V' 0O tO N el el N N N w tin r--. N N rl N N rl Vl N In N .O N N N N N N N N N an N N N N N N N N e-1 e-i N N N t0 ` N N N a to .. 0 r- Co .. O a el N 00 a a O (� co O 0 LO CD _ 7 m N 0 O O O O 0 CO Z ` a ,tr . r r r r r r 0 O OJ v '0 1'Cr 1 1 1 1 r y of .> N N r 4 1 Y a \ rin r r 3 a ° Q N NO ON ON ON N NO 0 W WO- - r 3 a N N - N — a _ 0 ,-a Q C .0 M Q d �.. a co O In T co t 40 O E Q \7en a '.w . 0) U U, N it) 'cc(' m W N M C). CO Q of v' m CO a CI) CC Q ut a 'a Q V? \ ri Ltl > m Q 0 m N m Q O 0 0 un a v N v, °� w m ti a v, v 0e-l' v Q N a 404 tocc co oa '.. d '� a Qin *ct Q ` a 'n \ . t N m m C) N - � � O a a a) a) .p ,C fl O ei N l7 m N - to V Oi m \ > co > CJ 4o N a1 N > > 4, 4., \ in H W L \ r1 M Vl cc m N In lD t0 CO m U U D I O c' N m cn D D > U- el el .0 In U W W W (7 m d .0 a Ui t7 to in w . ]O„ ° D D m la m n c 0 3 C a i _1 a OW U u �, _m '�. M a) >- m mC >- ro \ >- m a) m m m m >- O) 41 cYc 1p a) a1 a) 1p a1 0.1 cc c w U U CO U m U Y M U V Y D m l.J Y_ U U V m m Y_ Y_ \ — Y_ Y_ Y_ Y_ Y_ 0) 0 r 0 7 a 1- i- m ,- 2 2ea3 2 2 2 2f2 'Rr LO 22 In 10 CO VI u° a i n 9; on n m O 0 0 0 O in m m m m ri a °o r r c- 0 a yr Q 00 3 v d "Ct 4 l �' d' r u °C O 0 0 O O r O LL - N N N N N 0 O v co r- y N N oa) .. 0) > a ti O O 0 c co N el en N ri el V tO 'D 0' a' V to N m 00 N Vl '7 m 0 M N V1 N N tD Vl CO U h Y M m ri o N m N M ri ei o en N m N e-1 r-.4 m Om N O ri ri l-1 008000000000000000000008000888 >. Y O U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U 3 J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J . . . . . J J O -0 O W LU W W W W LU W LU W W W W W LU W W W W W W W W LU W W W LU W W 3 0 3 4... 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 O O y wu -0 m v a a 11 3 N ` a :-� Hello