HomeMy WebLinkAbout20143316.tiff BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO , PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Moved by Jordan Jemiola, that the following resolution be introduced for passage by the Weld County
Planning Commission. Be it resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the application for:
CASE NUMBER: USR14-0045
APPLICANT: BARTS VENTURE LLC, O/O RANDY KNEEBONE
PLANNER: KIM OGLE
REQUEST: A SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND USE BY SPECIAL USE PERMIT
FOR ANY USE PERMITTED AS A USE BY RIGHT, AN ACCESSORY USE, OR A
USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW IN THE COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL ZONE
DISTRICTS (TRUCKING AND TRUCK REPAIR SHOP FOR KNEEBONE
EXCAVATING 8( TRUCKING COMPANY ALONG WITH OUTSIDE EQUIPMENT.
VEHICLE STORAGE AND STAGING; AND RECREATION Al VEHICLE, BOAT
AND-G- AM•PEP-T-RAILER STORAGE, PROVIDED THAT THE PROPERTY IS NOT
A LOT IN AN APPROVED OR RECORDED SUBDIVISION PLAT OR LOTS PARTS
OF A MAP OR PLAN FILED PRIOR TO ADOPTION OF ANY REGULATIONS
CONTROLLING SUBDIVISIONS IN THE A (AGRICULTURAL) ZONE DISTRICT
LEGAL DESCRIPTION : PART SW4 SECTION 22, 1N. R67W OF THE 6TH P. M. , WELD COUNTY,
COLORADO.
LOCATION: EAST OF AND ADJACENT TO CR 19, 0.5 MILES SOUTH OF CR 8.
be recommended favorably to the Board of County Commissioners for the following reasons:
1 . The submitted materials are in compliance with the application requirements of Section 23-2-260 of
the Weld County Code.
2 . It is the opinion of the Planning Commission that the applicant has shown compliance with Section
23-2-220 of the Weld County Code as follows:
A. Section 23-2-220.A. 1 -- The proposed use is consistent with Chapter 22 and any other
applicable code provisions or ordinance in effect. Section 23-2-220.A. 1 . A. Policy 7. 1 . states
"County land use regulations should support commercial and industrial uses that are directly
related to, or dependent upon, agriculture, to locate within the agricultural areas, when the
impact to surrounding properties is minimal , or can be mitigated, and where adequate
services are currently available or reasonably obtainable." The Trucking Company base of
operations, trucking and truck repair shop along- with future screened Recreational Vehicle,
Boat and CampecTr-a+Isr-Storage
B. Section 22-2-100. E. C.Goal 5. States "Minimize the incompatibilities that occur between
commercial uses and surrounding properties." The facility is a located on a thirteen acre
parcel defined by the Brantner Ditch to the east and County Road 19 to the west. The 80 foot
x120 foot shop building will be constructed to the north end of the property and will be utilized
for parking and maintenance of equipment and vehicles. The proposal call of outside parking
of the 4 tractor trailers and construction equipment and this area will be required to be
screened from adjacent property and public rights-of-way. Planning staff will be requiring a
Screening Plan to screen outdoor storage/staging of vehicles, a parking plan to address
parking location on the property to mitigate the impacts of noise, exhaust onto neighboring
properties and a Lighting Plan to direct lights downward and away from neighboring
properties as a condition of approval prior to recording the USR map.
C. Section 23-2-220.A.2 -- The proposed use is consistent with the intent of the A (Agricultural)
Zone District. Section 23-3-40. S of the Weld County Code lists any use permitted as a Use
by Right, an Accessory Use, or a Use by Special Review in the Commercial or Industrial
Zone Districts (Randy Kneebone Trucking and Truck Repair Shop along with Outside
Equipment, Vehicle Storage and Staging; and--Recreat o.nal cle, Beat and-Camper Trailer
S.torage) provided that the property is not a Lot in an approved or recorded subdivision map
or lots parts of a map or plan filed prior to adoption of any regulations controlling subdivisions
as a Use by Special Review in the A (Agricultural) Zone District -
EXHIBIT
.
14_
RESOLUTION USR14-0045
VENTURE LLC, O/O RANDY KNEEBONE
PAGE 2
D. Section 23-2-220.A.3 -- The uses which will be permitted will be compatible with the existing
surrounding land uses. The surrounding properties are generally large parcel agricultural lots
with single family residences. To the north and northwest are several recorded exemption
parcels with improvements, and to the east, southwest and south are larger agricultural
parcels in production with a limited residential development. There are six property owners on
seven parcels within five hundred feet of this proposed facility. Two property owners
provided letters of opposition to the proposed facility. Barry and Valerie Maars with Maars
Milky Way Dairy, LLP, adjacent property owner to the north expressed concerns about
creating a small industrial zoned area in an agricultural / residential area appears to be
piecemeal approach to zoning and there were concerns with the request for the RV storage
lot when currently there are four large storage areas within 4 miles of this proposed facility.
Continuing, if approved a request for a building envelope, and the placement of the shop
approximately 250 feet to the east of County road 19 and restriction on noise levels and
hours of operation as well as fencing and landscaping requirements. A second property
owner, Mrs. James Lefforge, to the northwest of the property held concerns of the amount of
traffic and noise this facility would bring to the quiet neighborhood, and is opposed to this
facility. The New Brantner Ditch Company Board of Directors in an undated letter discussed "
. . .the forty (40) foot in width prescriptive easement from centerline of ditch utilized to run
water and maintain the ditch for the stockholders of the company. The company requires
that no above or below ground structures or improvements of any kind be placed on our
easement that may restrict our right to maintain either side of the ditch without Board
approval. In addition the company does not permit any non-historic storm flows anywhere
along the ditch . The application indicates that the normal drainage on the property sheet
flows into the ditch. This statement is inaccurate. The ditch has a berm along its western
side the entire length of this property and no historic flows have entered the ditch. Even in
last September's historic storm event, no storm water went into the ditch at this location, but
rather formed a pond above the ditch berm and radiated out into the field." As previously
stated, staff is requiring a Screening Plan to screen outdoor storage/staging of vehicles, a
Parking Plan to address parking location on the property to mitigate the impacts of noise,
exhaust onto neighboring properties and a Lighting Plan to direct lights downward and away
from neighboring properties as a condition of approval prior to recording the USR map.
E. Section 23-2-220.A.4 -- The uses which will be permitted will be compatible with future
development of the surrounding area as permitted by the existing zoning and with the future
development as projected by Chapter 22 of the Weld County Code and any other applicable
code provisions or ordinances in effect, or the adopted Master Plans of affected
municipalities.
The site is located within the three (3) mile referral area of the Cities of Dacono, Fort Lupton,
Brighton and Northglenn. The parcel is also located within the three (3) mile referral area of
Adams County. The City of Fort Lupton in their referral comments, dated August 13, 2014
indicated that they are currently updating the comprehensive plan map and the proposed
update includes the site within its boundaries. The City would like the opportunity to discuss
annexation with the applicant. The City of Northglenn in their referral comments. dated
August 22, 2014 indicated they have no concerns. The Cities of Dacono and Brighton and
the Adams County Planning Department did not return a referral response.
F. Section 23-2-220.A. 5 -- The application complies with Chapter 23, Article V, of the Weld
County Code. . The existing site is not located within the Floodplain, Airport or Geologic
hazard areas. The property is located within the County-Wide Road Impact Fee Area and the
Capital Expansion Impact Fee area.
Building Permits issued on the lot will be required to adhere to the fee structure of the
County-Wide Road Impact Fee Program .
Building Permits issued on the proposed lot will be required to adhere to the fee structure of
the County Facility Fee and Drainage Impact Fee Programs.
RESOLUTION USR14-0045
VENTURE LLC, CIO RANDY KNEEBONE
PAGE 3
G . Section 23-2-220.A.6 -- The applicant has demonstrated a diligent effort to conserve prime
agricultural land in the locational decision for the proposed use.
The proposed facility is located on approximately 13 acres designated "Prime" per the 1979
Soil Conservation Service Important Farmlands of Weld County Map. The parcel is
encumbered by the Brantner Ditch with a forty foot easement from centerline of the ditch to
the east and County Road 19. a collector roadway to the west. The oddly shaped parcel
would not be conducive to agricultural practices and there is no irrigation water associated
with this property.
H . Section 23-2-220.A.7 — There is adequate provisions for the protection of the health. safety,
and welfare of the inhabitants of the neighborhood and County.
The Design Standards (Section 23-2-240, Weld County Code), Operation Standards (Section
23-2-250, Weld County Code) , Conditions of Approval and Development Standards can
ensure that there are adequate provisions for the protection of health, safety, and welfare of
the inhabitants of the neighborhood and County.
This recommendation is based, in part, upon a review of the application materials submitted by the applicant,
other relevant information regarding the request, and responses from referral entities.
The Planning Commission recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following:
1 . Prior to recording the map:
A. The applicant shall submit a Lighting Plan to the Department of Planning Services, for review
and approval. Any lighting poles and lamps shall comply with Section 23-3-360. F. which states,
in part, that. "any lighting shall be designed. located, and operated in such a manner as to meet
the following standards: sources of light shall be shielded so that beams or rays of light will not
shine directly onto adjacent properties." (Department of Planning Services)
B. The applicant shall submit a Screening Plan to the Department of Planning Services for review
and approval . All parking areas shall be screened from adjacent properties and public rights of
way. (Department of Planning Services)
C. The applicant shall submit a Signage Plan to the Department of Planning Services. for review
and approval, if signage is desired. Signs shall be in compliance with Chapter 23, Article IV,
Division II and Appendices 23-C , 23-D and 23-E of the Weld County Code. (Department of
Planning Services)
D. The applicant shall submit a Parking Plan to the Department of Planning Services for review
and approval. This updated parking plan shall show the dimensions of the drives and the
parking stalls and delineate curb stops for the parking spaces shown on the Use by Special
Review map. (Department of Planning Services)
E. The applicant shall address the requirements (concerns) of the City of Fort Lupton, as stated in
the referral response dated August 13, 2014. Evidence of such shall be submitted, in writing, to
the Weld County Department of Planning Services. (Department of Planning Services)
F. The applicant shall submit written evidence of a commercial well to the Department of Planning
Services and the Department of Public Health and Environment. (Department of Public Health
and Environment)
G . The applicant shall submit a waste handling plan. for approval , to the Environmental Health
Services Division of the Weld County Department of Public Health & Environment. The plan
shall include at a minimum , the following:
RESOLUTION USR14-0045
VENTURE LLC. 0/O RANDY KNEEBONE
PAGE 4
1 . A list of wastes which are expected to be generated on site (this should include expected
volumes and types of waste generated).
2. A list of the type and volume of chemicals expected to be stored on site.
3. The waste handler and facility where the waste will be disposed (including the facility
name, address. and phone number). (Department of Public Health and Environment)
H . The applicant shall attempt to address the requirements of the Fort Lupton Fire Protection
District, as stated in the referral response dated August 5, 2014. Written evidence of such shall
be submitted to the Weld County Department of Planning Services. (Department of Planning
Services)
An Improvements Agreement will be required for this site. Road maintenance including
damage repairs and triggers for improvement will be a part of the Agreement (Trucking and
Future RV Storage). Written evidence of such shall be submitted to the Weld County
Department of Planning Services. (Department of Public Works)
J . The USR map shall be amended to delineate the following:
1 . All sheets of the map shall be labeled USR14-0045 (Department of Planning Services)
2. The attached Development Standards. (Department of Planning Services)
3. The map shall be prepared in accordance with Section 23-2-260. D of the Weld County
Code. (Department of Planning Services)
4. The applicant shall delineate the trash collection areas. Section 23-3-350. H of the Weld
County Code addresses the issue of trash collection areas. Areas used for storage or
trash collection shall be screened from adjacent properties and public rights-of-way.
These areas shall be designed and used in a manner that will prevent trash from being
scattered by wind or animals. (Department of Planning Services)
5. The approved Screening Plan. (Department of Planning Services)
6. The approved Lighting Plan. (Department of Planning Services)
7. The approved Signage Plan. (Department of Planning Services)
8. The approved Parking Plan. (Department of Planning Services)
9. County Road 19 is designated on the Weld County Road Classification Plan as an
arterial road, which requires 140 feet of right-of-way at full build out. There is presently 60
feet of right-of-way. An additional 40 feet shall be delineated on the plat as future County
Road 19 right-of-way. All setbacks shall be measured from the edge of future right-of-
way. The applicant shall verify the existing right-of-way and the documents creating the
right-of-way and this information shall be noted on the plat. a-f-the-r-iht of-way•cannot•be
erif-i t-s-ha-I-I--be- e4ca-te-c- This road is maintained by Weld County. (Department of
Public Works)
10. Show the approved access(es) on the map and label with the approved access permit
number (AP14-00278) (Department of Public Works)
11 . S#ew-aspha-IWa-rya-anl- re-e-y-cl-etaae4oc-ati ns-a-nd labc,. Show on the map the approved
tracking control. (Department of Public Works)
12 . Show Water Quality Control Volume (size) . in cubic feet volume on plat. Label "No Build
Zone and No Parking or Storage at this Location." (Department of Public Works)
RESOLUTION USR14-0045
VENTURE LLC. C/O RANDY KNEEBONE
PAGE 5
13. Show 45-60 foot adequate turning radius and tie into County Road 19 at the same grade.
(Department of Public Works)
14. Show 60 foot adequate turning radius and tie into County Road 19 at the same grade.
(Department of Planning and Engineering)
2. Upon completion of Condition of Approval #1 above, the applicant shall submit one (1 ) paper copy or
one (1 ) electronic copy (.pdf) of the map for preliminary approval to the Weld County Department of
Planning Services. Upon approval of the map the applicant shall submit a Mylar map along with all
other documentation required as Conditions of Approval. The Mylar map shall be recorded in the
office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder by the Department of Planning Services. The map
shall be prepared in accordance with the requirements of Section 23-2-260. D of the Weld County
Code. The Mylar map and additional requirements shall be submitted within one hundred twenty
(120) days from the date of the Board of County Commissioners Resolution. The applicant shall be
responsible for paying the recording fee. (Department of Planning Services)
3. In accordance with Weld County Code Ordinance #2012-3; approved April 30, 2012, should the map
not be recorded within the required one hundred twenty (120) days from the date of the Board of
County Commissioners Resolution, a $50.00 recording continuance charge shall added for each
additional three (3) month period. (Department of Planning Services)
4. The Department of Planning Services respectfully requests a digital copy of this Use by Special
Review, as appropriate. Acceptable CAD formats are .dwg, .dxf, and .dgn (Microstation); acceptable
GIS formats are ArcView shapefiles orArcGIS Personal GeoDataBase (MDB). The preferred format
for Images is .tif (Group 4). (Group 6 is not acceptable) . This digital file may be sent to
maps(a�co.weld.co.us. (Department of Planning Services)
5. Prior to Construction:
A. If more than 1 acre is to be disturbed, a Weld County grading permit will be required prior to the
start of construction. (Department of Public Works)
6. The Use by Special Review activity shall not occur, nor shall any building or electrical permits be
issued on the property, until the Use by Special Review map is ready to be recorded in the office of
the Weld County Clerk and Recorder or the applicant has been approved for an early release
agreement. (Department of Planning Services)
Motion seconded by Michael Wailes.
VOTE:
For Passage Against Passage Absent
Benjamin Hansford
Bruce Johnson
Bruce Sparrow
Jason Maxey
Jordan Jemiola
Joyce Smock
Michael Wailes
Nick Berryman
Terry Cross
The Chair declared the resolution passed and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this
case to the Board of County Commissioner's for further proceedings.
RESOLUTION USR14-0045
VENTURE LLC, C/O RANDY KNEEBONE
PAGE 6
CERTIFICATION OF COPY
I , Kristine Ranslem , Recording Secretary for the Weld County Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the
above and foregoing resolution is a true copy of the resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County,
Colorado, adopted on December 2, 2014.
Dated the 2nd of December, 2014.
Digitally signed by Kristine
�� �` i1U Rallainkt- Ranslem
Date: 2014. 12.05 07:44:58 -07'00'
Kristine Ranslem
Secretary
SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN
USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Barts Venture LLC
c/o Randy Kneebone
Kneebone Excavating and Trucking Inc.
USR14-0045
1 . A Site Specific Development Plan and Use by Special Use Permit, USR14-0045, for any use permitted as
a Use by Right, an Accessory Use, or a Use by Special Review in the Commercial or Industrial Zone
Districts (Trucking and Truck Repair Shop for Kneebone Excavating & Trucking Company along with
Outside Equipment, Vehicle Storage and Staging; and Recreational Vehicle, Boat-and-Gamper Trailer
Star--age) , provided that the property is not a lot in an approved or recorded subdivision map or lots parts of
a map or plan filed prior to adoption of any regulations controlling subdivisions in the A (Agricultural) Zone
District. subject to the Development Standards stated hereon. (Department of Planning Services)
2. Approval of this plan may create a vested property right pursuant to Section 23-8-10 of the Weld County
Code. (Department of Planning Services)
3. The hours of operation are 7:00 a. m . - 6:00 p.m . Monday — Saturday, as stated by the applicant(s).
(Department of Planning Services)
4. All liquid and solid wastes (as defined in the Solid Wastes Disposal Sites and Facilities Act, Section
30-20-100. 5, C. R. S.) shall be stored and removed for final disposal in a manner that protects against
surface and groundwater contamination. (Department of Public Health and Environment)
5. No permanent disposal of wastes shall be permitted at this site. This is not meant to include those wastes
specifically excluded from the definition of a solid waste in the Solid Wastes Disposal Sites and Facilities
Act, Section 30-20-100.5, C. R. S. (Department of Public Health and Environment)
6. Waste materials shall be handled, stored, and disposed of in a manner that controls fugitive dust, fugitive
particulate emissions, blowing debris, and other potential nuisance conditions. The applicant shall operate
in accordance with the approved Waste Handling Plan, at all times. (Department of Public Health and
Environment)
7. Fugitive dust and fugitive particulate emissions shall be controlled on this site. The facility shall be
operated in accordance with the approved Dust Abatement Plan, at all times. (Department of Public
Health and Environment)
8. This facility shall adhere to the maximum permissible noise levels allowed in the Non-Specified Zone
District, as delineated in Section 14-9-30 of the Weld County Code. (Department of Public Health and
Environment)
9. Any vehicle or equipment washing areas shall capture all effluent and prevent discharges in accordance
with the Rules and Regulations of the Water Quality Control Commission, and the Environmental
Protection Agency. (Department of Public Health and Environment)
10. All potentially hazardous chemicals must be handled in a safe manner, in accordance with product
labeling). All chemicals must be stored secure, on an impervious surface, and in accordance with
manufacturer's recommendations. (Department of Public Health and Environment)
11 . Process wastewater (such as floor drain wastes) shall be captured in a watertight vault and hauled off for
proper disposal . Records of installation, maintenance, and proper disposal shall be retained. (Department
of Public Health and Environment)
12 . Sewage disposal for the facility shall be by septic system . Any septic system located on the property must
comply with all provisions of the Weld County Code, pertaining to Individual Sewage Disposal Systems.
(Department of Public Health and Environment)
RESOLUTION USR14-0045
VENTURE LLC, O/O RANDY KNEEBONE
PAGE 8
13. A permanent, adequate water supply shall be provided for drinking and sanitary purposes. The facility
shall utilize the existing public water supply. (Department of Public Health and Environment)
14. The operation shall comply with all applicable rules and regulations of State and Federal agencies and the
Weld County Code. (Department of Public Health and Environment)
15. Sources of light shall be shielded so that light rays will not shine directly onto adjacent properties where
such would cause a nuisance or interfere with the use on the adjacent properties in accordance with the
plan. Neither the direct, nor reflected: light from any light source may create a traffic hazard to operators
of motor vehicles on public or private streets. No colored lights may be used which may be confused with,
or construed as, traffic control devices. (Department of Planning Services)
16. The screening/parking/signage/lighting on the site shall be maintained in accordance with the approved
Screening/Parking/Signage/Lighting Plans. (Department of Planning Services)
17. Should noxious weeds exist on the property, or become established as a result of the proposed
development, the applicant/landowner shall be responsible for controlling the noxious weeds, pursuant to
Chapter 15, Articles I and II, of the Weld County Code. (Department of Public Works)
18. The historical flow patterns and runoff amounts will be maintained on the site. (Department of Public
Works)
19. Weld County is not responsible for the maintenance of onsite drainage related features. (Department of
Public Works)
20. There shall be no parking or staging of vehicles on County roads. On-site parking shall be utilized.
(Department of Public Works)
21 . Building permits may be required, per Section 29-3- 10 of the Weld County Code. Currently, the following
have been adopted by Weld County: 2012 International Codes, 2006 International Energy Code, and 2011
National Electrical Code. A Building Permit Application must be completed and two (2) complete sets of
engineered plans bearing the wet stamp of a Colorado registered architect or engineer must be submitted
for review. A Geotechnical Engineering Report performed by a Colorado registered engineer shall be
required or an Open Hole Inspection. (Department of Building Inspection)
22. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Design and Operation
Standards of Chapter 23 of the Weld County Code.
23. Necessary personnel from the Weld County Departments of Planning Services, Public Works, and Public
Health and Environment shall be granted access onto the property at any reasonable time in order to
ensure the activities carried out on the property comply with the Conditions of Approval and Development
Standards stated herein and all applicable Weld County regulations.
24. The Use by Special Review area shall be limited to the plans shown hereon and governed by the
foregoing standards and all applicable Weld County regulations. Substantial changes from the plans or
Development Standards, as shown or stated, shall require the approval of an amendment of the Permit by
the Weld County Board of County Commissioners before such changes from the plans or Development
Standards are permitted. Any other changes shall be filed in the office of the Department of Planning
Services.
25. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with all of the foregoing Development
Standards. Noncompliance with any of the foregoing Development Standards may be reason for
revocation of the Permit by the Board of County Commissioners.
26. WELD COUNTY'S RIGHT TO FARM: Weld County is one of the most productive agricultural counties in
the United States, typically ranking in the top ten counties in the country in total market value of
agricultural products sold. The rural areas of Weld County may be open and spacious. but they are
intensively used for agriculture. Persons moving into a rural area must recognize and accept there are
RESOLUTION USR14-0045
VENTURE LLC, CIO RANDY KNEEBONE
PAGE 9
drawbacks, including conflicts with long-standing agricultural practices and a lower level of services than
in town. Along with the drawbacks come the incentives which attract urban dwellers to relocate to rural
areas: open views, spaciousness, wildlife, lack of city noise and congestion, and the rural atmosphere
and way of life. Without neighboring farms, those features which attract urban dwellers to rural Weld
County would quickly be gone forever.
Agricultural users of the land should not be expected to change their long-established agricultural
practices to accommodate the intrusions of urban users into a rural area. Well-run agricultural activities
will generate off-site impacts, including noise from tractors and equipment; slow-moving farm vehicles on
rural roads; dust from animal pens, field work, harvest and gravel roads; odor from animal confinement,
silage and manure; smoke from ditch burning; flies and mosquitoes; hunting and trapping activities;
shooting sports, legal hazing of nuisance wildlife; and the use of pesticides and fertilizers in the fields,
including the use of aerial spraying. It is common practice for agricultural producers to utilize an
accumulation of agricultural machinery and supplies to assist in their agricultural operations. A
concentration of miscellaneous agricultural materials often produces a visual disparity between rural and
urban areas of the County. Section 35-3.5-102, C.R.S. , provides that an agricultural operation shall not be
found to be a public or private nuisance if the agricultural operation alleged to be a nuisance employs
methods or practices that are commonly or reasonably associated with agricultural production.
Water has been, and continues to be, the lifeline for the agricultural community. It is unrealistic to assume
that ditches and reservoirs may simply be moved "out of the way" of residential development. When
moving to the County, property owners and residents must realize they cannot take water from irrigation
ditches, lakes, or other structures, unless they have an adjudicated right to the water.
Weld County covers a land area of approximately four thousand (4,000) square miles in size (twice the
size of the State of Delaware) with more than three thousand seven hundred (3,700) miles of state and
county roads outside of municipalities. The sheer magnitude of the area to be served stretches available
resources. Law enforcement is based on responses to complaints more than on patrols of the County,
and the distances which must be traveled may delay all emergency responses, including law enforcement,
ambulance, and fire. Fire protection is usually provided by volunteers who must leave their jobs and
families to respond to emergencies. County gravel roads, no matter how often they are bladed, will not
provide the same kind of surface expected from a paved road. Snow removal priorities mean that roads
from subdivisions to arterials may not be cleared for several days after a major snowstorm . Services in
rural areas, in many cases, will not be equivalent to municipal services. Rural dwellers must, by
necessity, be more self-sufficient than urban dwellers.
People are exposed to different hazards in the County than in an urban or suburban setting. Farm
equipment and oil field equipment, ponds and irrigation ditches, electrical power for pumps and center
pivot operations, high speed traffic, sandburs, puncture vines, territorial farm dogs and livestock, and open
burning present real threats. Controlling children's activities is important, not only for their safety, but also
for the protection of the farmer's livelihood.
ILAIltrizES
ID11l1
SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
Tuesday, October 7, 2014
A regular meeting of the Weld County Planning Commission was held in the Weld County Administration
Building, Hearing Room, 1150 O Street, Greeley, Colorado. This meeting was called to order by Chair,
Jason Maxey, at 1:30 pm.
Roll Call.
Present: Benjamin Hansford, Bruce Johnson, Bruce Sparrow, Jason Maxey, Jordan Jemiola, Joyce
Smock, Michael Wailes, Nick Berryman, Terry Cross.
Also Present: Kim Ogle and Tiffane Johnson, Department of Planning Services; Wayne Howard,
Engineering, Don Carroll, Department of Public Works; Lauren Light, Department of Health; Brad Yatabe,
County Attorney, and Kris Ranslem, Secretary.
Motion: Approve the September 16, 2014 Weld County Planning Commission minutes, Moved by Joyce
Smock, Seconded by Benjamin Hansford. Motion passed unanimously.
CASE NUMBER: USR14-0039
APPLICANT: EUDEN BALDERRAMA
PLANNER: KIM OGLE
REQUEST: A SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND USE BY SPECIAL USE
PERMIT FOR ANY USE PERMITTED AS A USE BY RIGHT, AN ACCESSORY
USE, OR A USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW IN THE COMMERCIAL OR
INDUSTRIAL ZONE DISTRICTS (HEAVY EQUIPMENT - TRUCKING AND
TRUCK REPAIR SHOP ALONG WITH OUTSIDE EQUIPMENTNEHICLE
STORAGE AND STAGING), PROVIDED THAT THE PROPERTY IS NOT A LOT
IN AN APPROVED OR RECORDED SUBDIVISION PLAT OR LOTS PARTS OF
A MAP OR PLAN FILED PRIOR TO ADOPTION OF ANY REGULATIONS
CONTROLLING SUBDIVISIONS IN THE A (AGRICULTURAL) ZONE
DISTRICT.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT B REC EXEMPT RE-4704, PART SW4 SECTION 22, T2N, R66W OF THE
6TH P.M.,WELD COUNTY, COLORADO.
LOCATION: 1300 FEET EAST OF CR 31: NORTH OF AND ADJACENT TO CR 18.
Kim Ogle, Planning Services, stated that the applicant is requesting a continuance to the November 4,
2014 Planning Commission hearing due to a medical emergency.
The Chair asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for or against the continuance
of this application.
Dale Dexter, 8326 CR 31, stated that he is an adjacent property owner. He said that it should be heard
today. He added that it is not compatible with the agricultural and residential area.
The Chair stated that the applicant and their representative are not here due to a medical emergency and
added that the request is to continue this case. Mr. Dexter stated that he is in favor of continuing this
case to the November 4th hearing.
Motion: Continue Case USR14-0039 to the November 4, 2014 Planning Commission hearing, Moved by
Benjamin Hansford, Seconded by Joyce Smock.
Vote: Motion carried by unanimous roll call vote (summary: Yes= 9).
Yes: Benjamin Hansford, Bruce Johnson, Bruce Sparrow, Jason Maxey, Jordan Jemiola, Joyce Smock,
Michael Wailes, Nick Berryman, Terry Cross.
CASE NUMBER: USR14-0045
APPLICANT: BARTS VENTURE LLC, CIO RANDY KNEEBONE
PLANNER: KIM OGLE
REQUEST: A SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND USE BY SPECIAL USE
PERMIT FOR ANY USE PERMITTED AS A USE BY RIGHT, AN ACCESSORY
EXHIBIT
1 -6
���-��-0045
USE. OR A USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW IN THE COMMERCIAL OR
INDUSTRIAL ZONE DISTRICTS (TRUCKING AND TRUCK REPAIR SHOP
FOR KNEEBONE EXCAVATING & TRUCKING COMPANY ALONG WITH
OUTSIDE EQUIPMENT. VEHICLE STORAGE AND STAGING: AND
RECREATIONAL VEHICLE, BOAT AND CAMPER TRAILER STORAGE),
PROVIDED THAT THE PROPERTY IS NOT A LOT IN AN APPROVED OR
RECORDED SUBDIVISION PLAT OR LOTS PARTS OF A MAP OR PLAN
FILED PRIOR TO ADOPTION OF ANY REGULATIONS CONTROLLING
SUBDIVISIONS IN THE A (AGRICULTURAL) ZONE DISTRICT
LEGAL DESCRIPTION PART SW4 SECTION 22. 1N. R67W OF THE 6TH P. M . . WELD COUNTY,
COLORADO.
LOCATION: EAST OF AND ADJACENT TO CR 19. 0.5 MILES SOUTH OF CR 8
Kim Ogle, Planning Services, stated that the applicants are requesting a continuance to the November
18, 2014 Planning Commission hearing to meet the 30 day mineral notification requirement.
The Chair asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for or against continuing this
application. No one wished to speak.
Motion : Continue Case USR14-0045 to the November 18, 2014 Planning Commission Hearing. Moved
by Nick Berryman, Seconded by Benjamin Hansford.
Vote: Motion carried by unanimous roll call vote (summary: Yes = 9).
Yes: Benjamin Hansford, Bruce Johnson, Bruce Sparrow, Jason Maxey, Jordan Jemiola, Joyce Smock,
Michael Wailes, Nick Berryman , Terry Cross.
CASE NUMBER: USR14-0023
APPLICANT- COULSON EXCAVATING COMPANY. C/O VARRA COMPANIES. INC
PLANNER. KIM OGLE
REQUEST: A SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW
PERMIT FOR A MINERAL RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT INCLUDING OPEN
PIT MINING (SANDS, GRAVELS AND STONES). AND MATERIALS
PROCESSING INCLUDING CONCRETE OR ASPHALT BATCH PLANTS
AND/OR RECYCLING OPERATIONS IN THE A (AGRICULTURAL) ZONE
DISTRICT
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT B REC EXEMPT RE-3197. PART NE4 SECTION 10. T5N, R65W OF THE
6TH P. M , WELD COUNTY. COLORADO_
LOCATION- NORTH OF AND ADJACENT TO EAST 16TH STREET WEST OF AND
ADJACENT TO FERN AVENUE
Kim Ogle, Planning Services, presented Case USR14-0023, reading the recommendation and comments
into the record .
Commissioner Jemiola noted that he knows the applicant, Brad Janes. but feels that he can make a fair
and impartial judgment on this case. In response to the Chair's inquiry, Mr. Jemiola stated that he has no
financial interest in this matter. The Planning Commission did not have any problems with Commissioner
Jemiola hearing this case today.
Mr. Ogle stated that the Department of Planning Services recommends approval of this application with
the attached conditions of approval and development standards.
Commissioner Maxey said that he didn't see the hours of operation in the staff report and asked if it
should be included. Mr. Ogle believed there is a development standard that talks about daylight hours of
operation per a Section of the Code.
Commissioner Maxey referred to Conditions of Approval 1 . K and 1 . L regarding exterior lighting and signs
and added that it appears identical Conditions of Approval 2 13 and 2 . 14. Mr. Maxey asked if both are
needed in the staff report. Mr. Ogle replied that both are required as the first part states that the
applicants needs to show us what the lighting standard is and on the map they will show where those
lighting centers are located. Mr. Maxey noted that these conditions of approval are identical in wording
and suggested that in Conditions of Approval 2. 13 and 2. 14 it should read "shall delineate the lighting or
sign locations". Mr. Ogle stated that Mr Maxey is correct and will amend the language.
2
SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
Tuesday, November 18, 2014
A regular meeting of the Weld County Planning Commission was held in the Weld County Administration
Building, Hearing Room, 1150 O Street, Greeley, Colorado. This meeting was called to order by Chair,
Jason Maxey, at 1:30 pm.
Roll Call.
Present: Bruce Sparrow, Jason Maxey, Jordan Jemiola, Joyce Smock, Michael Wailes, Nick Berryman,
Terry Cross.
Absent: Benjamin Hansford, Bruce Johnson
Also Present: Kim Ogle, Diana Aungst and Tom Parko, Department of Planning Services; Wayne
Howard and Jennifer Petrik, Department of Planning - Engineering; Elizabeth Relford, Department of
Public Works; Lauren Light, Department of Health; Brad Yatabe, County Attorney, and Kris Ranslem,
Secretary.
Motion: Approve the November 4, 2014 Weld County Planning Commission minutes, Moved by Bruce
Sparrow, Seconded by Joyce Smock. Motion passed unanimously.
CASE NUMBER: USR14-0045
APPLICANT: BARTS VENTURE LLC, C/O RANDY KNEEBONE
PLANNER: KIM OGLE
REQUEST: A SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND USE BY SPECIAL USE
PERMIT FOR ANY USE PERMITTED AS A USE BY RIGHT, AN ACCESSORY
USE, OR A USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW IN THE COMMERCIAL OR
INDUSTRIAL ZONE DISTRICTS (TRUCKING AND TRUCK REPAIR SHOP
FOR KNEEBONE EXCAVATING & TRUCKING COMPANY ALONG WITH
OUTSIDE EQUIPMENT, VEHICLE STORAGE AND STAGING; AND
RECREATIONAL VEHICLE, BOAT AND CAMPER TRAILER STORAGE),
PROVIDED THAT THE PROPERTY IS NOT A LOT IN AN APPROVED OR
RECORDED SUBDIVISION PLAT OR LOTS PARTS OF A MAP OR PLAN
FILED PRIOR TO ADOPTION OF ANY REGULATIONS CONTROLLING
SUBDIVISIONS IN THE A(AGRICULTURAL)ZONE DISTRICT
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PART SW4 SECTION 22, 1N, R67W OF THE 6TH P.M., WELD COUNTY,
COLORADO.
LOCATION: EAST OF AND ADJACENT TO CR 19, 0.5 MILES SOUTH OF CR 8.
Kim Ogle, Planning Services, presented Case USR14-0045, reading the recommendation and comments
into the record. Mr. Ogle noted that three surrounding property owners and the New Brantner Ditch
provided letters of opposition to the proposed facility. The letters outlined concerns in regard to creating a
small industrial zoned area in the agricultural residential area, concerns of the RV storage facility, amount
of traffic and noise to the area, and compatibility of the surrounding area. The New Brantner Ditch, in
their letter, stated that no above or below ground structures or improvements of any kind be placed on the
easement, without approval from the Ditch Board. The Department of Planning Services recommends
approval of this application with the attached conditions of approval and development standards.
Jennifer Petrik, Engineering, reported on the existing traffic, access and drainage conditions and the
requirements on site. Ms. Petrik requested to amend Condition of Approval 1.J.9 by removing the second
to last sentence "If the right-of-way cannot be verified, it shall be dedicated." Additionally, she requested
to amend Condition of Approval 1.J.11 to read "Show on the map the approved tracking control". Ms.
Petrik also suggested amending Condition of Approval 1.J.13 to read "Show 60 foot adequate turning
radius and tie into County Road 19 at the same grade."
Lauren Light, Environmental Health, reviewed the public water and sanitary sewer requirements, on-site
dust control, and the Waste Handling Plan. Ms. Light noted that there was a typographical error in
Development Standard 13 and asked that"public" be changed to"private".
1
Randy Kneebone stated that staff did a really good job of explaining the project. He has not purchased
the property yet, as he is waiting for approval of this proposal. He plans to build a shop and operate his
excavating business from this site. Mr. Kneebone said that he has no plans right now to build a house or
operate the RV storage but said it may be a thought in the future so he included it in the plan at this time.
Commissioner Wailes asked why the shop is located close to the neighbor. Mr. Kneebone said that he
wanted to keep it to the north so that he could use the rest of the property for the future residence/RV
parking. He added that the rest of the property could be farmed for hay right now.
Commissioner Jemiola stated that he struggles with having RV facilities in the agricultural zone district
and asked Mr. Kneebone what the primary use of the site will be and how important it is to have both
businesses or one. Mr. Kneebone said that it is extremely important for him to operate his excavating
business out of this site. He added that the RV facility was just something to potentially supplement
income. Mr. Kneebone said that he intends to build a shop for his excavating business and that is the
primary operation of the site. He emphasized that the RV storage is only an idea at this point.
Commissioner Berryman asked the applicant if he spoke with any of the surrounding property owners.
Mr. Kneebone said that he has not spoken to anyone; however he did stop twice at the Maars property to
the north but nobody was home.
The Chair asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for or against this application.
Commissioner Sparrow stated that he had lived in the area and knows the landowners in the area;
however he feels that he can be fair and impartial in this case. Brad Yatabe, County Attorney, said that if
Mr. Sparrow has doubts then he suggested that he recuse himself. However, he added that if he feels he
can be impartial and then gets into the testimony and decides he needs to leave, he may do so.
Arlan Maars, 2858 CR 19, stated that he and his brothers own the farm located north of this site. He
stated that he is concerned with the closeness of this activity from his brother's front door. He suggested
moving the shop, along with the access, further to the southern portion of the site. Additionally, he would
appreciate the applicant talking to his brother regarding the potential screening prior to the County
Commissioner hearing. Mr. Maars said that with regard to the RV storage facility it exponentially
increases the impact and if it is in the application then they have to assume it will be. He is concerned
with the additional amount of traffic.
Commissioner Sparrow said it sounds like Mr. Maars is not opposed to the project but wishes to see the
shop moved to the south. Mr. Maars said that he believes in private property rights but it does come
down to compatibility. He would just like to see it further away from the residences.
Barry Maars, 2528 CR 19, stated that he doesn't believe this project is in compliance with Section 23-2-
220.A.1 as it is not directly related to or dependent upon agriculture. Additionally, he cited Section 23-2-
220.A.2 and doesn't feel is it compatible with surrounding parcels. He added that Mr. Kneebone was
correct that there is alfalfa planted there now and has produced three (3) cuttings of hay. He is
concerned with the proximity of this to his house and the potential impact to the value of his property. He
also suggested that the shop be located to the southern portion of the property as it would give some
separation from the commercial impact and his house. He added that he is not crazy about the RV
storage component.
Mr. Kneebone said that he put the shop up on the northern portion of the site since it is the high side of
the property. He does not intend to block Mr. Barry Maars' view by locating his shop at the northern
portion of the building, but rather match the location of Mr. Maars' shop. Mr. Kneebone emphasized that
he wants to be a good neighbor and is happy to work the neighbors.
Commissioner Berryman asked how many vehicles will be on site. Mr. Kneebone said that he started this
company 19 years ago with 1 dump truck and it has grown slowly. He said that he hasn't given much
thought about it but added that currently he has four (4) trucks and approximately 35 heavy equipment
vehicles and he doesn't envision much growth. Mr. Berryman said that it would be a good courtesy to the
public to give them a reasonable expectation for the future.
2
Commissioner Jemiola clarified if screening will be added. Mr. Kneebone said that he will add screening
if that is what is required, he just prefers open space.
Commissioner Maxey said that the neighbors appear to be agreeable to the project but are concerned
with compatibility. He encouraged the applicant to visit with them regarding their concerns and potential
changes to the layout of the site plan.
The Chair asked staff to repeat the suggested changes to the Staff Report. Ms. Petrik stated that after
further review she would like to add a Condition of Approval 1 .J to read "Drainage analysis is required by
a Colorado Professional Engineer to determine a design to maintain historic flows on site."
Motion: Add Condition of Approval 1 .J as stated by staff, Moved by Nick Berryman, Seconded by
Michael Wailes. Motion carried unanimously.
Additionally, Ms. Petrik requested an amendment to Condition of Approval 1 .J.9 by removing the second
to last sentence, "If the right-of-way cannot be verified, it shall be dedicated."
Motion: Amend Condition of Approval 1 .J.9 as stated by staff, Moved by Nick Berryman, Seconded by
Joyce Smock. Motion carried unanimously.
Ms. Petrik suggested changing the language in Condition of Approval 1 .J. 11 to read "Show on the map
the approved tracking control."
Motion: Amend Condition of Approval 1 .J. 11 as stated by staff, Moved by Nick Berryman, Seconded by
Terry Cross. Motion carried unanimously.
Ms. Petrik suggested amending Condition of Approval 1 .J. 13 to read "Show 60 foot adequate turning
radius and tie into County Road 19 at the same grade."
Motion: Amend Condition of Approval 1 .J. 13 as stated by staff, Moved by Nick Berryman, Seconded by
Joyce Smock. Motion carried unanimously.
The Chair asked the applicant if they have read through the amended Development Standards and
Conditions of Approval and if they are in agreement with those. The applicant stated that he agrees with
the conditions of approval and development standards but requests a continuance to allow him time to
discuss mitigation with the neighbors.
In response to the Chair's inquiry, Mr. Ogle stated that the Board of County Commissioner hearing is
scheduled for December 17, 2014. The Chair asked the applicant if he felt he could mitigate these
concerns by the Board of County Commissioner hearing. Mr. Kneebone said that should allow him
enough time to meet with the Maars' and come to an agreement if that fits into the Maars' schedule.
Motion : Continue to the December 2, 2014 Planning Commission hearing, Moved by Bruce Sparrow,
Seconded by Nick Berryman.
Vote: Motion carried by unanimous roll call vote (summary: Yes = 7).
Yes: Bruce Sparrow, Jason Maxey, Jordan Jemiola, Joyce Smock, Michael Wailes, Nick Berryman, Terry
Cross.
Meeting adjourned at 5:49 pm.
Respectfully submitted,
Digitally signed by Kristine Ranslem
14 Date: 2014.11 .20 07:52:48 -07'00'
Kristine Ranslem
Secretary
3
C 712
lid) 9\ I
SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
Tuesday, December 2, 2014
A regular meeting of the Weld County Planning Commission was held in the Weld County Administration
Building, Hearing Room , 1150 O Street, Greeley, Colorado. This meeting was called to order by Chair,
Jason Maxey, at 1 :30 pm.
Roll Call.
Present: Benjamin Hansford , Bruce Sparrow, Jason Maxey, Jordan Jemiola, Joyce Smock, Michael
Wailes, Nick Berryman, Terry Cross.
Absent: Bruce Johnson.
Also Present: Kim Ogle, Chris Gathman and Tom Parko, Department of Planning Services; Wayne
Howard and Jennifer Petrik, Department of Engineering; Elizabeth Relford and Janet Lundquist,
Department of Public Works; Lauren Light, Department of Health; Brad Yatabe, County Attorney, and Kris
Ranslem , Secretary.
Motion: Approve the November 18, 2014 Weld County Planning Commission minutes, Moved by Bruce
Sparrow, Seconded by Michael Wailes. Motion passed unanimously.
CASE NUMBER: USR14-0045
APPLICANT: BARTS VENTURE LLC, C/O RANDY KNEEBONE
PLANNER: KIM OGLE
REQUEST: A SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND USE BY SPECIAL USE
PERMIT FOR ANY USE PERMITTED AS A USE BY RIGHT, AN ACCESSORY
USE, OR A USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW IN THE COMMERCIAL OR
INDUSTRIAL ZONE DISTRICTS (TRUCKING AND TRUCK REPAIR SHOP
FOR KNEEBONE EXCAVATING & TRUCKING COMPANY ALONG WITH
OUTSIDE EQUIPMENT, VEHICLE STORAGE AND STAGING; AND
RECREATIONAL VEHICLE, BOAT AND CAMPER TRAILER STORAGE),
PROVIDED THAT THE PROPERTY IS NOT A LOT IN AN APPROVED OR
RECORDED SUBDIVISION PLAT OR LOTS PARTS OF A MAP OR PLAN
FILED PRIOR TO ADOPTION OF ANY REGULATIONS CONTROLLING
SUBDIVISIONS IN THE A (AGRICULTURAL) ZONE DISTRICT
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PART SW4 SECTION 22, 1N, R67W OF THE 6TH P.M., WELD COUNTY,
COLORADO.
LOCATION: EAST OF AND ADJACENT TO CR 19, 0.5 MILES SOUTH OF CR 8.
Commissioner Hansford stated that he was not in attendance at the last hearing where this case was
presented; therefore he would like to recuse himself for this case.
Kim Ogle, Planning Services, presented Case USR14-0045, reading the recommendation and comments
into the record . Mr. Ogle noted that since the continuance from the last hearing, the applicant has
removed the RV component from the application and has amended the site plan to move the residence
from the south end of the property to the north end which will be located closer to the existing residences.
Additionally, the proposed shop is located to the south end of the property, as requested by the
surrounding property owners. The Department of Planning Services recommends approval of this
application with the attached conditions of approval and development standards.
Jennifer Petrik, Engineering, recommended amending Condition of Approval 1 .J .9 by removing the
second to last sentence "If the right-of-way cannot be verified , it shall be dedicated." Additionally, she
requested to amend Condition of Approval 1 .J . 11 to read "Show on the map the approved tracking
control". Ms. Petrik also suggested amending Condition of Approval 1 .J. 13 to read "Show 60 foot
adequate turning radius and tie into County Road 19 at the same grade."
Lauren Light, Environmental Health, stated that they have no concerns with removing the RV component.
1
Randy Kneebone, 1384 Reliance Court, Erie, Colorado, said that since the last hearing he has met with
Mr. Barry Maars who lives directly north of the property. He added that he has amended his site plan to
be more compatible with the surrounding neighbors.
The Chair asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for or against this application.
Barry Maars, 2528 CR 19, stated that he lives directly north of the proposed site. He thanked Mr.
Kneebone for his willingness to work with him . He added that with the amended plan he feels that the
potential impacts have been minimized as much as possible and are satisfied with this plan. Mr. Maars
asked the Planning Commission to consider eventual numbers with this project. He has no problem with
what Mr. Kneebone is proposing for equipment; however this USR stays with the property and is
concerned that if left open those numbers might increase with a potential different business in the future.
The Chair asked what maximum limit he would be satisfied with. Mr. Maars said that he would be
agreeable to 10 over the road trucks and then possibly a 10 percent increase in equipment.
Mr. Kneebone said that he would agree to the 10 truck limit. Currently he has 35 pieces of excavation
equipment of which 90% is not typically on site. After further clarification on the breakdown of number of
trucks and trailers, he requested 10 trucks and 10 trailers along with the excavation equipment.
Commissioner Sparrow asked if it would be easier to limit the parking to a certain number of acres. Ms.
Petrik said that it could be limited to the number of acres; however it would affect the drainage on site as
the impervious area is larger and might require additional drainage requirements.
Commissioner Maxey asked if this could be worked out before the Board of County Commissioner
hearing. Mr. Ogle replied yes.
Ms. Petrik noted that at the last hearing a Condition of Approval 1 .J was added to read "Drainage analysis
is required by a Colorado Professional Engineer to determine a design to maintain historic flows on site".
Since the RV component is no longer part of this application, Ms. Petrik recommended that this condition
no longer be required.
Brad Yatabe, County Attorney, stated that since it was voted on at the last hearing it should be voted on
to remove that requirement as well .
Motion : Delete Condition of Approval 1 .J as was amended at the last hearing, Moved by Nick Berryman,
Seconded by Bruce Sparrow. Motion carried unanimously.
Motion : Amend Condition of Approval 1 .J .9 as stated by staff, Moved by Bruce Sparrow, Seconded by
Michael Wailes. Motion carried unanimously.
Motion : Amend Condition of Approval 1 .J . 11 as stated by staff, Moved by Nick Berryman, Seconded by
Bruce Sparrow. Motion carried unanimously.
Motion : Amend Condition of Approval 1 .J . 13 as stated by staff, Moved by Bruce Sparrow, Seconded
by Michael Wailes. Motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Yatabe recommended that since the RV, boat and camper trailer component have been withdrawn
from the application that it also be deleted in the staff report.
Motion : Delete all references regarding RV, boat and camper trailers from the staff report, Moved by
Bruce Sparrow, Seconded by Joyce Smock. Motion carried unanimously.
The Chair asked the applicant if they have read through the amended Development Standards and
Conditions of Approval and if they are in agreement with those. The applicant replied that they are in
agreement.
Motion : Forward Case USR14-0045 to the Board of County Commissioners along with the amended
Conditions of Approval and Development Standards with the Planning Commission's recommendation of
approval, Moved by Jordan Jemiola, Seconded by Michael Wailes.
2
Vote: Motion carried by unanimous roll call vote (summary: Yes = 8).
Yes: Benjamin Hansford, Bruce Sparrow, Jason Maxey, Jordan Jemiola, Joyce Smock, Michael Wailes,
Nick Berryman, Terry Cross.
Meeting adjourned at 4:52 pm .
Respectfully submitted,
43i Digitally signed by Kristine Ranslem
T noit.,1r' . Date: 2014.12.05 07:58:52 -07'00'
Kristine Ranslem
Secretary
3
Hello