The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20151490.tiff RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION FOR COUNTY ROAD 61 (FEMA)AND AUTHORIZE CHAIR TO SIGN WHEREAS,the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County,Colorado,and WHEREAS,the Board has been presented with a Community Development Block Grant Application for County Road 61 (FEMA) from the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, to the Colorado Department of Public Safety, Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, commencing upon full execution,with further terms and conditions being as stated in said application,and WHEREAS, after review, the Board deems it advisable to approve said application, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the Community Development Block Grant Application for County Road 61 (FEMA) from the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County,to the Colorado Department of Public Safety, Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management,be,and hereby is,approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the Chair be, and hereby is, authorized to sign said application. The above and foregoing Resolution was,on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 27th day of May,A.D.,2015. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY,COLORADO ATTEST: der.,(_v, &C ;� EXCUSED .ate+� Barbara Kirkmeyer,Chair Weld County Clerk to the Board '000,2 ,' Mike Freeman,Pro-Tern BC:i0k-iDEp Clerk to the oard # s, ,,�` ,O% Sean P.Conway > p� �� APPROVEOR 1� , �k.4.r C! It' �_ !pIlieA.Cozad �° County Attorney l Q� i®' °��eve Moreno Date of signature: et'UE&i;Act.4- t°/aa 2015-1490 EM0016 BC0045 Colorado Division of Homeland Security Grant NOI / Application r t , Emergency Management CDBG - DR Recover Colorado Infrastructure Program THIS SECTION FOR STATE USE ONLY DHSEM Identification Number: Colorado Point of Contact: CDBG-DR Program Manager Date NOI (Part A) Received: Colorado DHSEM 9195 East Mineral Avenue, Suite 200 Date Application (Part B) Received: Centennial, Colorado 80112 Office: 720.852.6713 Date Next Steps Letter Transmitted: Fax: 720.852.6750 cdps dhsem cdbgaa,state.co.us PART A - NOI : PROJECT OVERVIEW 1 . Applicant Legal Name: Weld County, Colorado 2. Applicant ✓ Local Government Private Non-Profit (Attach copy of 501c3, if applicable) Type: 3. Project Title: (6) - County Match FEMA Projects - WELCO11 ( 112) 4. Proposed Project Total Cost: 1 ,477,793.49 CDBG-DR-I Request: 184,724. 19 5. Certifications: The undersigned assures fulfillment of all requirements of the CDBG-DR Recover Colorado Infrastructure Program as contained in the program guidelines and that all information contained herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. The governing body of the applicant has duly authorized the document, commits to the non-Federal and State share identified in the Budget, and hereby applies for the assistance documented in this application. Also, the applicant understands that the project may proceed ONLY AFTER a GRANT AGREEEMENT is approved. Mike Freeman , Pro-Tem Weld County Commissioner (970) 356-4000 Typed Name of Authorized Applicant Agent Title Telephone Number ne02.4,seinte, MAY 272015 Signature of Authorized Applicant Agent Dare Signed 2015- 1490 Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. I'agc 1 of 20 iiii- sma nC'I)IiG-DK Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management PART A - NOI: APPLICANT INFORMATION 1 . Applicant Legal Name: Weld County. Colorado 2. FIPS Code: 123 DUNS Number: 07575-7955 3. U.S. Congressional District: 4th Congressman Name: 4. State Senatorial District: 1 Senator Name: Mr. Cory Gardner 5. State Legislative District: 50 Representative Name: Mr. Ken Buck 6. Primary Point of Contact: The Primary Point of Contact is the person responsible for coordinating the implementation of this proposal, if approval is granted. Ms. I Mr. 0 Mrs. . First Name: Roy Last Name: Rudisill Title: Director organization: Weld County Office of Emergency Manageme Street Address: 1150 O Street City: Greeley State: Colorado Zip Code: 80631 Telephone: (y I u )sud 1a\: (y f u )s.ib- / e mobile: (9 /U) 38 " -U E-mail Address: rrudisill(@co .weld . eo 7. Alternate Point of Contact: The Alternate Point of Contact is the person that can address questions or concerns in the Primary Point of Contact's absence. Ms. Q NI, Ill MIs.n First Name: Barb Last Name: Connolly Title: Controller organization: Weld County Accounting Street Address: 1 150 O Street City: Greeley State: Colorado zip Code: 80631 Telephone: (y f u )i95 F: x: (y 1 v)i.iO- i 6 Mobile: E-mail Address: bconnollyco.weld . 8. Application Prepared by : Ms. Mr I \his First Name: Kyle Last Name: Jones Title: Planner Organization: ARCADIS-US Street Address: City: Tallahasst State: FL Lip Code: 32309 Telephone: (ubu )b16 F: x: Mobile: (215, 2U2-J E-mail Address: kyle . iones a(�arcadis- 9. Authorized Applicant Agent: Ms. 0 Mr. M: s. II First Name: Barbara Last Name: Kirkmeyer Title: CommiSSii Organization: Weld County Street Address: 1150 O Street, P . O . Box 758 City: Greeley State: Colorado "Zip Code: 80631 Telephone: k ' 1 13).306 E.. \: Mobile: E-mail Address: bkirkmeyer(c�co .welc The Authorized Applicant Agent MUST be the chief executive officer, mayor, etc. This person must be able to sign contracts, authorize funding allocations or payments, etc. Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 2 of 20 CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management PART A - NOI: PROJECT DESCRIPTION & NATIONAL OBJECTIVES MET 1. Project — Eligible Activity Description: Describe the proposed project. Explain how the proposed project will address recovery and/or resilience needs in your community either independently or as part of a larger project. Include a description of the desired outcome and the recovery objective(s) to be achieved. This narrative should describe the CDBG-DR Eligible Activity. In an effort to achieve resiliency from the severe storms and minimize risk to the general public, Weld County addressed severe damage to local roadways , bridges, culverts , removed hazardous roadway debris, made emergency repairs to paved and gravel roadways , addressed river embankments/dangerous conditions to the public and made repairs to emergency response vehicles that were damaged during the Incident Period . FEMA Categories A, B , C , and E were addressed in the Weld County FEMA Match . CDBG funds are needed to be applied towards the Weld County FEMA Local Match for the emergency and permanent work that was identified on previously submitted Project Worksheets . All projects covered under the Weld County Project Worksheets were vital for Weld County to clear hazardous debris from roadways/creeks/streams and enhance their infrastructure. river embankments, equipment and roadways . This particular NOI/Application ‘/A/J_ I r'n '1 1 111O1 Thin rnrelitfl4 ks ,rIe irfit.rdI� i ni tk rni44.-.i-1 i ir�rnr r,rnn ton' nne4 2. Site / Physical Location: Describe the area(s) affected/protected by this project, including location by complete street address and longitude and latitude (coordinates in decimal degrees). The latitude is 40 . 387530 and longitude is - 104 .488870 . The attached spreadsheet shows the Lat/Long coordinates for all of the Project Worksheets and depicts the damage site locations as identified in the correlating Project Worksheets . However; the area affected 3. Population Served: Briefly describe the demographics of the population served or protected by this project. Include the percent of the overall community population benefiting from this project. Explain your response. An estimated 90% or more of the community benefited from the proactive work by Weld County and the removal of hazardous debris and the emergency work/repairs made to the roadways, bridges, equipment and culverts. The population benefiting from this Match Project will include an LMI level population percentage that will be directly or indirectly impacted through this project. This NOI and the associated PW impacted the entire County and demographic area . White : 67 .6% , Hispanic: 28 . 3% , Other: 1 .6% , Asian : 1 . 3% , Black : 0 .8% , Native American : 0 .4% . Weld County consists of 99, 317 households with a median househo d income of $56. 589 and the maior_ity of Weld Coun:v is owner-occuoied wi-h 4. Priority of this Project: If you are submitting more than one CDBG-DR Infrastructure NOI, what is the relative priority of this project? Please indicate the priority as: Priority # of## Projects Submitted. Priority 6 of 36 Projects Submitted . Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 3 of 20 I CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management PART A - NOI: CDBG-DR FUNDING QUALIFICATIONS Community Development Block Grant — Disaster Recovery (CDBG-DR) funding can be approved for a project in which ALL of the following requirements are met The physical location of the activity must be within a county listed in Table 1 of the program Recover Colorado Infrastructure Grant Program Guidelines (Guidelines). 1. Connection to Disaster Recovery CDBG's Disaster Recovery funds must be used for necessary expenses related to disaster relief, long-term recovery, restoration of infrastructure and housing, economic revitalization, and mitigation from future damages.. The activity must show a direct link to damages received during one or more of the events listed in Table 1 of the Guidelines. Please provide a brief explanation of how the proposed acquisition activity: (1) was a result of the disaster event; (2) will restore infrastructure or revitalize the economy; or will (3) mitigate future damages. During the incident period of September 11 , 2013 to September 30 , 2013 , Weld County, Colorado received heavy rainfall and debris in the creeks, streams and rivers which caused surface gravel removal and scour damage to numerous roads and bridges in Weld County . This NOI Application request addresses emergency work and the damages that were a lir��4 ri.,., .14 ..f 4h.. .., CI -% J: .. Th .. .... 1 ..4:.. PM A / 44..-.4 :.. :n4r.,-1 ran, inn4 C 2. Compliance with National Objectives State recipients receiving allocations under the CDBG-DR program must certify that their projected use of funds will ensure, and maintain evidence, that each of its activities assisted with CDBG-DR funds meets at least one of the three National Objectives. a) Which of the National Objectives are met by proposed project? Will benefit low and moderate income (LMI) persons; or Will aid in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight; or I Is an Urgent Need in which meet community development needs having a particular urgency because existing conditions pose a serious and immediate threat to the health or welfare of the community where other financial resources are not available to meet such needs. b) How will the proposed project meet the above checked National Objective(s). See attached LMI data for the Project . In addition to the LMI data attached , the State of Colorado (according to ACS 2008-2012 5Y ) lists Weld County at a 41 .0% LMI . In reviewing the LMI data for this Project NOI , the PW associated LMI % was 38 . 16% . However, this percentage does not accurately capture the total number of service areas that are either directly or indirectly impacted by the FEMA Match Projects. The entire community benefited from the proactive emergency work by Weld County and the removal of hazardous debris and the work/repairs made to the roadways, bridges, equipment and culverts thus the County believes that a higher LMI % should be given for this FEMA match Projects. The general vicinity of FEMA Match Projects encompasses the entire County and greatly benefits the entire LMI population for this project, which is why the County believes that this project not only meets, but exceeds the 50% requirement for meeting the National Objective . The emergency work/repairs that were made under the WELCO PW's for the Local FEMA Match drastically reduced hazardous conditions for the general public and enabled Weld County to focus on resiliency efforts post storm . It is believed that the service area for Project Site Locations benefited multiple LMI tract sections and thus a higher weighted percentage of over 50% should be noted for this Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 4 of 20 ('1)R(;-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 3. Compliance with the primary objective. As indicated in the Guidelines: "A proposed project's benefits to LMI persons will be an important factor in evaluating potential infrastructure projects. A total of 20% of the Recover Colorado Infrastructure project funding must benefit LMI persons. Due to the very low percentage of LMI projects submitted in the first round of infrastructure funding, it is estimated that approximately 25% to 30% of the funding available in this second allocation must meet the LMI requirement to make up for the deficit." This section does not need to be completed if the project does not meet this National Objective. The primary objective for using CDBG Disaster Recovery funds is benefitting, by at least 51 percent, persons of low and moderate income. The following section provides the information necessary to complete this requirement. a) Is the proposed activity: �/ jurisdiction wide specified target area If you checked specified target area, which data source was used? (Note: select the smallest unit of Census data that encompasses your proposed target area.) b) Enter the number of households involved in the proposed project. 99, 317 c) In the space below, describe how the applicant will comply with the requirement that at least 51 percent of CDBG-DR dollars will principally benefit low- and moderate-income households and persons. Weld County will comply with the 51 % requirement due to the fact that the PW associated under this NOI Project for the FEMA County Match is targeted to areas of the county that qualify as LMI . The justification behind this methodology is that multiple d) Enter the number of households within each income category expected to benefit from the proposed project. Incomes above 80% of the County Median 785 Incomes above 50% and up to 80% of the County Median 1265 Incomes at or below 50% of the County Median 2060 e) Which type of income was used to determine the above? (Check only one) As determined by the American Community Survey (Public Facilities projects) Annual income as defined for Public Housing and Section 8 Annual income as reported under the Census long form Adjusted gross income as defined for reporting under IRS I Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 5 of 20 I CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management PART A - NOI: COMPREHENSIVE RISK ANALYSIS INFORMATION I 1. Community Hazards Review: Please list and briefly describe in rank order of importance the natural or man-made hazards in your (the Applicant's) service area. The hazards identified within this Project for the FEMA County Match for WELCO11 ( 112) would be ranked in the following manner: Flood , Erosion and Subsidence . The hazards caused significant damage and posed a severe risk to the community for the designated incident period . 2. High Risk Hazards Addressed by the Project: Describe how, and the degree to which, the proposed project mitigates high risk hazards. include damage history, source and type of problem, frequency of event(s), and severity of damage information, if available. Ilaz.ard I Flooding caused the most severe damage to Weld County during the designated incident period and this Project addressed and mitigated against severe flood damage to local roadways, bridges, culverts, removed hazardous debris along roadways . In addition , County Officials ensured repairs were made to paved and gravel roadways for the safety of the community and addressed river embankments/dangerous conditions to the public and made repairs to emergency response vehicles that were damaged during the Incident Period . The repairs made brought the damaged infrastructure back to its pre-disaster condition in accordance with regulations . Hazard 2 Erosion also caused a severe issue for the County . This Project addressed and mitigated against severe erosion damage to local roadways , shoulders , and embankments. The work that was conducted by the County mitigated against any immediate threat/hazard to the damaged infrastructure and restored the infrastructure back to its pre-disaster condition in accordance with regulations . Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and c-mail submittal. ra;ic 6 of 20 CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management Hazard 3 Subsidence was another critical hazard that caused dangerous conditions for the community. This Project addressed and mitigated against severe subsidence damage to local roadways , shoulders , bridges and embankments . The work that was conducted by the County mitigated against any immediate threat/hazard to the damaged infrastructure and restored the infrastructure back to its pre-disaster condition in accordance with regulations . Note: If your proposed project addresses more than three Hazards, please provide that information as an attachment. 3. Elimination of Risk: Does the proposed project result in the elimination of a hazard from your (the Applicant's) service area? If so, please describe. If not, please estimate the degree to which this project will mitigate the risk from the hazards identified in Item #2. The Proposed FEMA Local Match for WELCO11 ( 112 ) does not completely eliminate the hazards identified from the service area . The Proposed FEMA Match Project does allow Weld County to receive a percentage of funds back that the County expended during one of the most costly disasters in Colorado history however. These types of hazards that occurred in Weld County and throughout Colorado are truly an act of mother nature and the County was as prepared as it could have been but the severity/duration of the incident was of an unprecedented nature . Weld County cannot eliminate the risk of future flooding , erosion or land subsidence, but Local Officials can ensure that their community is prepared for future incident, take the necessary precautions and that their infrastructure is restored 4. Environmental Quality Improvements: Does the proposed project result in an improvement in the quality of the natural environment in your (the Applicant's) service area? If so, please describe. Yes; the damages that attributed to the designated incident period and FEMA-DR 4145 were addressed via the previously submitted PW and the work conducted to restore the infrastructure back to its pre-disaster condition was implemented . The work done at this site location (see previous attachment for lat/long coordinates ) addressed not only improvements/repairs made to the infrastructure, but also improvements and repairs to the river embankments and any potential erosion or subsidence issues that could have tAirnrcrtnnrl if them m i in+v hnd nnf fnlrnn +hr, n.rnorfiiin +Vinyl rlirl Q I 5. Climate Change Improvements: Does the proposed project reduce or ameliorate a projected impact of climate change in Colorado? If so, please briefly describe the benefit of the project. This Proposed Project reduces a projected impact climate change due to the proactive mitigation measures that were undertaken by Weld County during the designated incident period . This was accomplished by ensuring that the damaged site location was addressed as soon , but as safely, as possible , and not to sustain any further impacts to the site locations or environment that would enable the damage to enhance the projected impact of any potential climate changes. Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 7 of 20 CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 6. Community Process: Does the proposed project include a community planning or involvement process that increases community resiliency? If so, please briefly describe the process. This Proposed Project was initiated by County Officials in an effort to achieve resiliency from the severe storms and also to minimize risk to the community, Weld County addressed the severe flood damage to the roadways and infrastructure by ensuring that dangerous conditions for the public were addressed and mitigated properly and efficiently. 7. Reduction in the Costs of Future Response or Recovery: Will the proposed project result in a reduction in the cost of response or recovery from an incident occurring due to one or more of the hazards identified in Item #1 or #2? If so, please briefly describe how response or recovery costs will be reduced. For a small scale flooding incident, yes; however, the flooding that occurred during the designated incident period was catastrophic and the PW associated with the NOI FEMA Local Match Request were completed to address the damages . 8. Floodplain/Floodway/Substantially Damaged Properties: Does the proposed project include a property or properties located in a floodway or floodplain; or not located in a regulatory floodplain but which were substantially damaged or have a history of damage from at least two disaster events? If so, please identify those properties below. No; the Proposed Project is for the FEMA Local Match for WELCO1 1 ( 112 ) from CDBG-DR in regards to expenses from CAT C Damage Categories for the designated incident period for FEMA-DR 4145 . 9. Mitigation Planning: Does your community have a current FEMA approved multi-hazard mitigation plan? ✓ I Ye, No Location of proposed project in mitigation plan strategies: Page 139 Section/Part Mitigation Stra Is the community a member of good standing with the National Flood Insurance Program? I No Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and c-mail submittal. Page 8 of 20 CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 10. Community Plan Compliance: Does the proposed project comply with and/or address an issue recognized in key community plans? Key plans include, but are not limited to: a Comprehensive Master Plan, a Stormwater Management Plan, a Hazard Mitigation Plans, or key community codes. If so, please describe how the project integrates into the plan(s). Yes; the Proposed Project complies with all local community plans and this Project integrates into the Plans because the County addressed the damages to local roadways and infrastructure and mitigated damages that posed a serious risk/hazard to the community during the incident period . This FEMA PW was initiated by Weld County and via this Proposed Project, the County requests that CDBG funds be applied towards the local FEMA Match for this Project. 11. Environmental / Historic Preservation Issues: Please describe any significant environmental, historic, or cultural features that may be affected by the project. Please also describe any features that may be improved by the project. All environmental issues are addressed on the previously submitted Project Worksheet as supporting documentation . The significant EHP issues were in regards to the Endangered Species Act ( ESA) and EHP Standard Conditions . All items were addressed and supporting backup documentation can be provided , in addition to the PW, upon request. 12. Permitting: Please list the local, state, and federal permits that will be required to complete this project. All permitting was addressed on the previously submitted Project Worksheet as supporting documentation . The significant permitting issues were in regards to the Endangered Species Act ( ESA) and EHP Standard Conditions. All items were addressed and supporting backup documentation can be provided , in addition to the PW, upon request . Please see below for environmental permits that were obtained . Floodplain Permit An /1 AI .,}i�r ..iil� 17nrmi} Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 9 of 20 CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 13. Community Resilience: Please describe how this project will increase the resilience of your community. As defined in the Guidelines: "Resilience incorporates hazard mitigation and land use planning strategies; critical infrastructure, environmental and cultural resource protection; and sustainability practices to reconstruct the built environment, and revitalize the economic, social, and natural environments." In an effort to achieve resiliency from the severe storms and minimize risk to the general public, Weld County addressed severe damage to local roadways, bridges, culverts, removed hazardous debris roadways , made repairs to paved and gravel roadways , addressed river embankments/dangerous conditions to the public and made repairs to emergency response vehicles that were damaged during the Incident Period . This Proposed Project addresses proactive work initiated by Weld County during FEMA-DR 4145 enabled the community to recover in an expeditious manner and increased the resilience of the community by incorporating nearly every aspect of sustainability and revitalizing the community . The community was able to recover quicker due to the proactive work done through this Proposed Project and the associated PW's . 14. Maps Please attach the following maps with the project site and structures marked on the map. Use SAME ID number as in the Individual Property Worksheets. Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM). If the FIRM for your area is not published, please attach a copy of the Flood Hazard Boundary Map (FHBM). City or county scale map (large enough to show the entire project area) USGS 1 :24,000 topo map Parcel Map (Tax Map, Property Identification Map, etc.) F Overview photographs. The photographs should be representative of the project area, including any relevant streams, creeks, rivers, etc., and drainage areas which affect the project site of will be affected by the project. 15. Additional Comments (Optional): Enter any additional comments related to the proposed project's ability to reduce hazard risk and increase community resiliency. This proposed project reduced the hazard risk to the community and increased resiliency by the work conducted through the PW in correlation with FEMA-DR 4145 . CDBG funds are being requested to be applied to the local FEMA Match ( 12 . 5% ) for the PW. All maps are located in project files that were previously submitted and will be provided upon request. The entire rnmmtinitv henefited from the nrnartive work by Weld Col inty and the removal on Attach any continuations or additional Rene, as an Attachment to the electronic application and c-mail submittal. Page 10 of 20 I CDBC-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management PART A - NOI: DECISION MAKING PROCESS 1. Decision-Making Process: Describe the process you used to decide that this project is the best solution to the problem. Explain why this project is the best alternative you considered. Address questions such as: • Are you focusing on the area in your community that has the greatest potential for losses? • Have you considered the risks to critical facilities and structures and benefits to be obtained by mitigating this vulnerability? • Have you considered those areas or projects that present the greatest opportunities given the current situation(s) of interest in your community? • Are you addressing a symptom or the source of the problem? Addressing the source of the problem is a long-term solution which provides the most mitigation benefits. • I f impacts to the environment, natural, cultural or historic resources have been identified, explain how your alternatives and proposed project address, minimize, or avoid these impacts. The Site locations within this WELCO PW in the Proposed Project were identified due to the high dollar amount of funds that were expended by Weld County to ensure the safety of the community and also restore county infrastructure back to its pre-disaster condition . This Proposed Project has site locations across the entire community and service area and it was determined that a large percentage of the LMI population was impacted by the severe flooding incident and the proactive work by County Officials enabled the community to recover quicker, thus allowing the community to sustain resiliency and return operations to normal . 2. Acquisition Projects - Describe the community's methodology for selecting the properties to be acquired in this application and how each is ranked (highest to lowest): N/A Attach any continuations or additional items as an kttorlillIC111 to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 11 of 20 I CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management PART A - NOI: SCOPE OF WORK / BUDGET OVERVIEW / FINANICAL FACTORS 1. Project Scope: Please provide a comprehensive and detailed description of the scope of the proposed project. Describe each of the project components and the steps necessary to complete that work. If the proposed project is a funding match for another disaster recovery or infrastructure development program, please identify the agency, program funds, and project reference number that CDBG-DR funding is intended to support. Also describe any critical deadlines that must be met to accomplish this work. This Proposed Project is for the Local FEMA Match for costs for WELCO11 ( 112 ). These costs were incurred as a result of FEMA-DR 4145 . During the incident period of September 11 , 2013 to September 30 , 2013 , Weld County, Colorado received heavy rainfall and debris in the creeks , streams and rivers which caused severe flooding to and along roadways and surface streets, and also severely damaged local infrastructure. This NOI Application request addresses the emergency work / damages that were a direct result of the severe flooding . A Scope of Work is included within the PW and addresses the work that was completed and is attached . 2. Community Priority : Please describe why this project is a priority for your organization. This Proposed Project is a priority for Weld County to utilize the CDBG funding as the Local FEMA Match to offset the costs for the proactive work done by the County to reduce hazardous conditions to the community. Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 12 of 20 CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 3. Project Cost Summary: Please summarize the major cost components of the project. Please round all values to the nearest dollar. a. Planning / Engineering / Design $ b. Environmental Compliance $ The value of general and/or c. Real Property Acquisition / Demolition $ professional labor wages must be tabulated in accordance d. Closing Costs / Legal Fees $ with the Davis Bacon Act of e. Housing Program Assistance $ 1931 f. Construction Costs $ g. Project Delivery Costs $ h. Other (specify below) $ 1 ,477,793,49 See Protect Worksheet Cost 1. Total ofa-h $ 1 ,477,793.49 I )uhlication of Benefits (if unknown at time of application enter zero). $ 0.00 k. Subtract j. from i. to determine Total Project Cost $ 1 ,477,793.49 Notes: Housing Program Assistance costs include the cost of compliance with Uniform Relocation Assistance (URA) and Comparable Housing Assistance (CHA) requirements. Project Delivery Costs include the costs of project delivery by the sponsoring organization but do not include administrative overhead. 4. Total Project Cost Allocations Proposed Project Total Cost: $ 1 .477 793.49 Federal Cost Share: $ 1 . 108,345 12 State Cost Share: $ 184,724. 19 $ 184.724.19 Local Cost Share 5. Basis of Cost Estimate: Briefly describe how the cost estimates listed in #3 above were developed (e.g. lump sum, unit cost, quotation, etc.). The Cost Estimates were developed above from actual work that was properly procured and conducted . They come directly off of what was included on the FEMA approved PW and the costs are broken down by type of work and site . 6. Project Management: Describe how you will manage the costs and schedule, and how you will ensure successful performance. The work for this Proposed Project has been completed or is pending completion . The 12 . 5% CDBG Local Match will be applied towards the Weld County Match for FEMA PW's and the costs that were previously incurred during the disaster. Note: The applicant must agree to furnish quarterly reports during the entire time the project is in active status. Quarters end on March 31st, June 30th, September 30th, and December 31st. Reports are due to the State within 15 days after the end of each quarter.) tttach an} continuations or additional item, as an lttachinent to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 13 of 20 CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 7. Project Maintenance Requirements: The following questions are to give assurance on the project's maintenance over its useful life. Please answer each question and give a brief explanation. a. If the project involves the acquisition of real property, what is the proposed land use after acquisition? (i.e., Agriculture, Recreation, Vacant Land, Park, Wetlands, etc.) N/A b. Will the project require periodic maintenance? No c. If yes, who will provide the maintenance? N/A d. What is the estimated cost of maintenance on an annual basis? 0 Note: Cost of maintenance is considered an application prioritization weighting factor. Projects with high maintenance costs have a greater risk of future failure due to deferred maintenance. Therefore, the responses provided above should be as complete and verifiable as possible in order to minimize the likelihood of ranking point reductions due to maintenance concerns. 8. Additional Comments: Enter any additional comments related to the proposed project's funding, if desired. CDBG funds are needed for the 12 . 5% Local FEMA Match and the associated PW that is included in the NOI-Application . 9. Financial / Fiscal Health Factors: Please indicate the total budget (all funds) of your organization. Please describe the impact of disaster recovery efforts to date on this budget. In addition, if this objective is selected based on the local governments inability to finance the activity, the municipality must also include in the application package a resolution stating this fact and supporting documentation such as budgetary information, a description of TABOR restrictions, and the most recent audit report or approved exemption from audit. Weld County's total 2015 budget is $307 , 031 , 089 .00 . The impact of the September, 2013 flooding has primary been on the damage to the county's road and bridge system . The damage has resulted in Weld County having to transfer $5 million from the Contingency Fund to the Public Works Fund in 2013 and in 2014 for a total of $ 10 million dollars . Without assistance from FEMA, FWHA, and CDBG the amount would have several million more . The impact has also forced the county to shift local resources from projects unrelated to flooding to deal with the emergency situations created by the flood in both the 2013 and 2014 fiscal years. Even in 2015 the county is still using local resources to recover from the flooding . Fortunately, Weld County has always been fiscally conservative and budgeted responsibly . Had the county not taken the responsible approach to its finances county service would have had to have been cut to cope with the flood recovery. + 1A/o r (-'ni inty nnorttoc i inr or tho mnc - roc rir i'io nrnnor-v tv _ imitc•inn in ±o c-oto Rocir ofl Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Paige 14 of 20 CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management PART B - APPLICATION : PROJECT MILESTONES / TIMELINES / TASKS 1. Timeline / Tasks Insert the proposed work schedule as tasks to accomplish the overall goal of the proposed activity (i.e., appraisals, title search, closing, etc.), and provide a description of the task's purpose. This timeline will be used as a measurement tool for progress in the project's implementation and is included in the required Quarterly Reports. Also, FEMA uses the timeline for determining the approved period of performance. It will be the basis used to justify delays or extensions, if necessary, and should be estimated carefully. The first and last entries are state requirements and have already been entered. Task 1 : Grant Process and Environmental Review Timeframe: 3 Months Task 2: Emergency Repairs- The initial emergency repairs were made directly 1 Completed J Y p 9 Y p Y Timeframe: Task 3: Permanent Repairs - Becuase the emergency repairs werequick repaii Completed p 9 Y p p Timeframe: Task 4: Timeframe: Task 5: Timeframe: Task 6: Timeframe: Task 7: Timeframe: Task 8: Timeframe: Task 9: Timeframe: Final Inspection Report and Project Closeout Task 10: The Final Inspection Report is a review of the activitys paper documentation, showing the project was implemented as required. Once the review is completed. the 3 Months report and findings will be provided to the grantee for review and concurrence. The I imefrume: State submits the concurrence to FEMA as part of a closeout package to formally Total Project '1'imefrante: 6 Months Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 15 of 20 CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 2. Start Date & Pre-Award Costs: The start date for any project begins upon GRANT AGREEMENT approval by the State Controller. If a different start date or timeframe is needed, provide an explanation below. Also indicate if any pre- award activities or costs have been incurred or authorized. The proposed project is for local FEMA match dollars and the work has already been completed . The repairs for this site began as soon as the flood waters receded and the county crews were able to access the site . The initial phase of repairs were emergency in nature and began in September of 2013 and concluded during November of that same year. Permanent repairs for this site commenced the following year at the beginning of construction season and concluded in October of 2014 . Additionally, cost have been incurred through the preparation of the NOI Application . Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 16 of 20 CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management Please note that Part B is required for the final Application submittal. Part B sections may optionally be completed and submitted with the NOI. Please update any Part A section information when submitting you full Application. PART B — APPLICATION : ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW 1. Environmental Review Background Information & Environmental Review Worksheet: In accordance with 24 CFR Part 58.22 (see below), all federally funded projects must accomplish an environmental review prior to beginning any work on a project. These HUD regulations are in place for two purposes: 1 . To ensure federal funds are used to place people of low and moderate income in environmentally safe conditions; and 2. To ensure federal funds are NOT used to negatively impact environmental conditions that exist near a project site. Please note the following limitations on CDBG-DR grant activities pending environmental clearance per 24 CFR Part 58.22. (a) Neither a recipient nor any participant in the development process, including public or private nonprofit or for-profit entities, or any of their contractors, may commit HUD assistance under a program listed in Sec. 58. 1(b) on an activity or project until HUD or the state has approved the recipient's RROF and the related certification from the responsible entity. In addition, until the RROF and the related certification have been approved, neither a recipient nor any participant in the development process may commit non-HUD funds on or undertake an activity or project under a program listed in Sec. 58. 1(b) if the activity or project would have an adverse environmental impact or limit the choice of reasonable alternatives. (b) N/A for DOLA/CDPS projects. (c) If a recipient is considering an application from a prospective sub-recipient or beneficiary and is aware that the prospective sub-recipient or beneficiary is about to take an action within the jurisdiction of the recipient that is prohibited by paragraph (a) of this section, then the recipient will take appropriate action to ensure that the objectives and procedures of NEPA are achieved. (d) An option agreement on a proposed site or property is allowable prior to the completion of the environmental review if the option agreement is subject to a determination by the recipient on the desirability of the property for the project as a result of the completion of the environmental review in accordance with this part and the cost of the option is a nominal portion of the purchase price. There is no constraint on the purchase of an option by third parties that have not been selected for HUD funding, have no responsibility for the environmental review and have no say in the approval or disapproval of the project. (e) Self-Help Homeownership Opportunity Program (SHOP). In accordance with section 11(d)(2)(A) of the Housing Opportunity Program Extension Act of 1996 (42 U.S.C. 12805 note), an organization, consortium, or affiliate receiving assistance under the SHOP program may advance non-grant funds to acquire land prior to completion of an environmental review and approval of a Request for Release of Funds (RROF) and certification, notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this section. Any advances to acquire land prior to approval of the RROF and certification are made at the risk of the organization, consortium, or affiliate and reimbursement for such advances may depend on the result of the environmental review. This authorization is limited to the SHOP program only and all other forms of HUD assistance are subject to the limitations in paragraph (a) of this section. (f) Relocation. Funds may be committed for relocation assistance before the approval of the RROF and related certification for the project provided that the relocation assistance is required by 24 CFR part 42. Attach any continuations or additional items as an :Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 17 of 20 CDBC-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management Environmental Review Worksheet Check ALL of the activities listed below that will be included as part of the project, REGARDLESS OF THE FUNDING SOURCE: Q Information and financial services Administrative and management activities Ig Environmental and other studies, resource identification, and the development of plans and strategies 51 Most engineering and design costs associated with eligible projects ■ Inspections and testing of properties for hazards or defects o .� • Project planning ¢ ❑ Purchase of insurance > ❑ Purchase of tools W ❑ Technical assistance and training >C i~ .5 O Interim assistance to arrest the effects of an imminent threat or physical deterioration in which the assistance • w 0 does not alter environmental conditions. `" p Public services that will not have a physical impact or result in any physical changes (e.g., employment, child �� P Y P P Y g care, health, education, counseling, welfare) 5 Assistance for temporary or permanent improvements that do not alter environmental conditions and are limited to protection, repair, or restoration activities necessary only to control or arrest the effects from disasters or imminent threats to public safety including those resulting from physical deterioration (Must also complete the Regulatory Checklist at the end of Exhibit IV-A) co > Q Operating costs (e.g., maintenance, security, operation, utilities, furnishings, equipment, supplies, staff training z and recruitment, other incidental costs) Vx ❑ Relocation costs m p Acquisition, repair, improvement, reconstruction, or rehabilitation when the facilities and improvements are in place and will be retained in the same use without change in size or capacity of more than 20 percent ❑ Special projects directed to the removal of material and architectural barriers that restrict the mobility of and accessibility to elderly and handicapped persons Acquisition (including leasing) or disposition of, or equity loans on, an existing structure ❑ Acquisition (including leasing) of vacant land provided the structure or land acquired, financed, or disposed of will be retained for the same use LI Acquisition, repair, improvement, reconstruction, or rehabilitation when the facilities and improvements are in 4 place, but will change in size or capacity of more than 20 percent > ❑ Acquisition, repair, improvement, reconstruction, or rehabilitation when the facilities and improvements are in place, but will involve a change in land use, such as from non-residential to residential, commercial to industrial, or from one industrial use to another R Demolition New construction This checklist must be included with the CDBG application. Please direct questions to the appropriate contact person below: DOLA/DLG DHSEM Steven Boand, State Disaster Recovery Manager Tamra Norton, Environmental Compliance Officer Department of Public Safety Department of Local Affairs Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 1313 Sherman Street, Room 521, 9195 E Mineral Ave, Suite 200 Denver, CO 80203 Centennial, CO 80112 303-866-6398 720.852.6713 tamra.norton@state.co.us steven.boand(c,state.co.us DPS/DOLA USE ONLY: Required level of environmental review: 0 Exempt 0 CENST 0 CESTO EA Reviewed by: Date of Review: Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 18 of 20 CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 2. Supplemental Environmental Review Information Enter any additional comments related to environmental concerns for the proposed project if desired. Please list and attach any documents or studies that have been prepared that support the Environmental Review Worksheet responses. All environmental issues are addressed on the previously submitted Project Worksheet as supporting documentation . The significant EHP issues were in regards to the Endangered Species Act ( ESA) and EHP Standard Conditions . All items were addressed and supporting backup documentation can be provided , in addition to the PW, upon request. Please see below for environmental permits that were obtained . Floodplain Permit 404 Nationwide Permit Migratory Birds Permit (if needed ) Threatened and Endangered Species Permit a attach and continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 19 of 20 CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management PART B - APPLICATION : DETAILED PROJECT BUDGET 1. Detailed Project Budget: Please enter or attach a detailed and comprehensive final proposed budget for the project. Please note that CDBG-DR funds may be limited to the amount submitted with the NOI pending the availability of additional funding This Proposed Project is for the Local FEMA Match for costs for WELCO11 ( 112). These costs were incurred as a result of FEMA-DR 4145 . During the incident period of September 11 , 2013 to September 30 , 2013 , Weld County, Colorado received heavy rainfall and debris in the creeks, streams and rivers which caused severe flooding to and along roadways and surface streets, and also severely damaged local infrastructure . This Application request addresses the emergency work / damages that were a direct result of the severe flooding . A Scope of Work and detailed project budget is included within the PW and addresses the work that was completed and can be provided upon request. It is important to note that a version request has been made for this Project Worksheet and the attached Project Worksheet may not reflect FINAL costs. Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 20 of 20 to 4, al 0 V C E 7 al al E C 0) m 0) c C • 4 0 E y Q w 3 0 a o O y al o c E w ° E • `• - aa)i E E 2 o CI) 7 m u C E -001 J w ° E 0 c o O O c 2 v C m• m• ° 0 • o (i 0 E a 17 10 aJ J U E E n 30 0 -O 0 c '0 E O 3 3 -0 o 3 O 0 0 3 o a1 _ 19 m o O 0 C C C c c c O E y 7 7 7 0 u O 000) 0) 4, U U U a v m Z O O CO O O O — 2 3 3 LC2 3 3 oo J 6J J e e o o de o owe a ae o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0R o ae o e ae e o de e o e oe o e e e 0 0 ae o 0 0 0 ri t0 to it lD tD O N N O O O 03 LC) LO Ql LO O ri O C C ID N 00 N rti Q C 00 C 00 N N. N a m on C N el el el ri ri C N N N N C .-I l-1 ri to r•1 N N N ✓) U) ri e-t ri N co 01 in .-I Ul ei C C .--1 C VI C V al co 00 00 CO CO CO Cl N N N N 471 00 03 03 0 CO 00 00 N N N CO 0 U1 N m N N Ul N ul Ul Ul 00 al CO Cl N o. 03 N m m m m M 00 in to M M 00 M rr1 01 M 01 (Cr N 01 M 01 N in N IN N N N V DO 01 03 In O 0 O J t1) 01 u1 In Ul Ul Vl Ul 0 0 in in in in in in 0 U1 O in Vl in in ✓1 0 0 0 0 Ul V1 0 al 0 0 0 Ul V) al Ul 0 ul 01 r1 ri N U e1 r-1 .-1 Ul CO 00 N l ri ri Ul r 01 N in V) N in V 0 N in m m m In m N CON N ClCrN N N N i e-1 t0 00 ) in t0 in O Ul CO N co rn m m N al a) f. r m m to CO r-1 0 0 N 1 0 0 0 N 0 0 N — M M M M M •-4Nr .-� N N m m M N m N N N m el N el N N N N N r-1 Z D O cO 0 J in in 0 0 0 0 0 in in in O O to 0 0 0 0 0 to in O o 0 0 U) O ✓1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 in in Lin in in m to up tD LO tD t0 M 0 0 0 0 nl tD tD lD 0 0 0 to 0 M In tD 0 m 0 0 Ul U1 m ut m .-4 ri C M 0 M O N N O o 0 0 o N C C C C N 0 0 0 m O C N C tD tD o r-+ O C N 10 tO O tD O C C in N 00 N N N N N N .-1 .-i rl N N N .-el N a-' N r-' .-1 c-1 a-1 e-I J V1 O Ul ✓1 U1 Vl Vl U) in in O 0 in in M in O in ul O O in U1 Ul O V) in o Ul to 1/1 01 U1 O Cl U1 V1 ill in M O N O tD 1D LO lD tD N M m N N N lD ID t0 0O lD N o N Ul tfl tD C al M O U1 U1 Q) ) Ci N N Vl N co N m tO N N N N N N tD 0 0 03 CO '.O N N N N N In N 00 e1 el N M kb 0 el el el LID .l tD N N CO lD C tD 0 i.J m c-i el .--1 r-1 el r1 el f-1 el 0 -J to V1 VI VI V) V) ✓) VI 0 0 V) V) V1 U) U1 Vl V) V) CD Ul in UlV1 O V) 0 0 in in in U) inO 0 0 Ul 0 In 3 ri CO 00 CO CO 03 to to in in in u1 00 CO 03 01 00 03 MIn N 00 )a 00 to N N 0a N CO a) a) N to o u1 to in CO N N N N N in ID VD 1.0 0 to N N- N C N M lD N M N it. N N ✓l N in 0o es N N .-t ti r-i r1 n, el N N N ri el el (VI N .-t rti el N N el .--' .-t ri es et el O VI el el el e1 .--1 0 0 0 el el 0 el e1 e1 N e1 U) U) el 0 0 ri N Ir1 0 tD 0 0 m 0 M 00 03 0 0 Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .-1 t-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 el o r1 tD N Ul Vl M Ul Ul tO O O Ul ✓1 ID Ul Ul UI Ul VI N N Ul co co in f-1 r♦ 0 0 CO 00 .-i CO ri al 0) to tD 0 l0 0 0 0 r.$ N N N N O N N N N 0 N N N N N 0 0 N .-i .-1 N N N N N .-i .-I N ri N rl .-1 r-1 0 N O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 in 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m m M m M m m M M m M M m MM M MMM m m M m M M M m m m m m m M m m m m MM m IN N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N IN IN N N N N IN N N .-i ri .-i .-i .-1 ri el el v.1 .-1 el el r1 el el r1 el .-i el r1 .-1 r-1 .-1 r1 e-1 .-1 .-i rti .-1 e-1 .-1 ri t"1 '-1 .N r-1 ei Y CO CO CO CO CO CO 00 CO 00 CO 00 00 CO CO 00 CO 00 00 CO CO 00 00 CO CO CO 00 00 CO 00 00 CO 00 03 00 CO 00 W 00 00 00 V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V) in in in VI VI in V1 VI VI Vl in in Vl 1.11 VI VI VI VI VI VI VI N N VI VI VI VI III V) VI VI V) Vl ✓1 VI N V) VI VI O O O O O O O O 0 0 O S 0 O O S O O O O O O O O S O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 O CJ O o o O O 00000000000000000000 In 0 00000000000000000000000000000000000000 D 0 7 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 010000000000000000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d to to In to to to to In ul to Vl Ul to to to in al in in al .n In to In In in in to in in to in in to In in to to to to rq P"1 t'1 t-1 r-I .-1 r-1 .-'1 r-1 r-1 r'1 .--1 r-1 r'1 ri r-1 r-1 .--1 r-I .--I r-' e-I .--1 r-1 r-I .-1 P'1 tti .'i .-1 t-1 .-i r-i e-1 .-1 r-1 e-1 ri ei r1 ri N m C In r♦ e-1 e-1 .-1 .-1 .-I .-i N M ri N ei N ri .-i N r-1 el N III C .-i N m C ti el el el el el ti ri c 0 m 0 -J C C C G to 0 N 00 01 O ri ri N N Ul In tD CO co Ol M m M M C ri m Cr Ul 0 N CO ri ti .-i r-i .-i e-i e-i !ri .-i ri N N N N N N rV N N In M M M M In rn 0 a a < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < <a al 2 2 a) 2 2 2 2 U) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Ui 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 I 4J t11 w L11 w w w I.0 w w L1l w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w to Iu LL1 LLJ w LLJ w LLl lu LL1 Iu LL LL LL LL U- LL LL LL U- U- LL U- U- LA- LL U- LL U- U- LL LL LL LL LL LL LL U- U- LL LL LL LL LA- LL LL LL LL LL LL LL 00 0 0 0 0 0000000000000000000000000000 0 0 N 0 0 00 C 03 Li" C a) N N Ol M N M N N C In 0 ei 01 N M In N to l-i m t0 ri (O 0 M Cr, m 0 01 01 03 al C in 00 el .-i Ln ri N C C U1 M CO t0 C C V1 Ul N N in tD M 0 Cr O 00 Ci 0) r-i 0 N C in ri ri C) in N N U) N .-i to al .y al In N a) Cl 03 tD 0O 00 m M lD N C In N 0) 00 O M M N N 00 M CO 0 N tD 03 N r-1 C 03 ri iD VI el C 17 VI O ei ...I 0 0 0 C m an co W C C0 00 00 C C 0 e-i co m M O N a) O e-i in in V1 Ul 01 T N O C N V1 01 D C C M m M M M C ri ri N N C M M M m m C C N N N m m N r-1 O N N N N N O 0 C C ri C 0 _ _ _ _ 0 C C C C C C C v C Cr C C C C C C vo C C C C C C C C C C o C a C C C C a C C C C J � H CC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 00 0 'O OO 0 0 0 0 0 O0 0 0 0 O O O O OHO O O C C 00 00 o in 0 0 a) tD 00 m 01 01 N N in N m tD CO 01 01 N O N el O U) N M U1 in N C C m al N C CO in CO r-1 00 CO (71 01 N C C C U1 Vl el CO 00 CO 0 CO CO N 01 0 0 00 N 0) al 00 N to M N N CO ri ID at 0 CO N y N 0 Sr C C C Sr .-i 0 0 .-i .-i .-i CO 03 00 in In M O ri 00 ri V al n Leo C 0) a) 0 03 10 00 ID M .-i a) N N 15 01 V) C C C C C 0 0 N 0 0 0 03 00 00 r♦ .-i N 0 0) 0) C 00 .-i m O N N 03 N m C 03 LO O N 0) In J ID LO N N N N N N O 0 00 co N C V v C C t0 t0 CO 00 00 N CO O 0 01 00 0O 00 00 0 co 00 in N a) t0 O V V C C C C O Ul in C C C C C C C V C V V V V V C u) in C C V V ct to V V V O V ul 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C r-1 ri t-1 r+ r-1 ri ri .-1 ri r♦ ri ri r-1 ri r-1 ri .-1 ri r♦ ri ri ri ri ri v-1ri r-1 .-i ri ri .--1 ri ri r-1 r l r-1 ri r-1 ri ri O J -ir ' 9-I NI "=I V Y= i �I �I Q < < a a a I ,. I M W 1.?j W w W • = '• J LL LL V. , u.. LL - ,.i 1 hw r • L a '7I .. • C I < LL LL . • N o f +C1 I in re- Wtu • 14 I f .•i • 'I NI �I I '•I '�I V _I 'I oI iyj', • 41/4 LL LL IWi IWL LL LL ii Ili •`� •-.� ' •,�,. . _. 2 f ' flfl < B, : a. _ . mot • + ': O IO + •�r = , 0 u. LI alt- 1 diett IT stsi P- f . 4. , -i . .i _ Uc N V CL a ci i i . • 'G = w r Vii' © ® - tri c u.. u_ �I •� . � 'CD CD cp, 44 O y I. . . . . . , -5 ED 04. , - ti - �. $ s Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 1 of 22 PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00112(1 ) P Applicant Name: Application Title: WELD (COUNTY) WELD COUNTY CR 61 Period of Performance Start: Period of Performance End: 09-14-2013 Subgrant Application - Entire Application Application Title: WELD COUNTY CR 61 Application Number: PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00112(1 ) Application Type: Subgrant Application (PW) Preparer Information Prefix First Name Iris Middle Initial Last Name Spanski Title PACL Agency/Organization Name FEMA - DHS Address 1 9200 E. MINERAL AVE . Address 2 City CENTENNIAL State CO Zip 80112 Email deanna.butterbaugh@state.co.us n Is the application preparer the Point of Contact? o Point of Contact Information Prefix First Name Roy Middle Initial Last Name Rudisill Title Director - OEM Agency/Organization Weld County Address 1 1150 O Street Address 2 rrudisill@weldgov.com City Greeley State CO ZIP 80632 Phone 970-304-6540 Fax Email rrudisill@weld.gov.com https://isource.fema.net/emmie/dispatchDestination.do?menuTile=&topTi le=dsHeader&bo... 4/ 17/2015 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 2 of 22 Alternate Point of Contact Information Prefix First Name Middle Initial Last Name Title Agency/Organization Address 1 Address 2 City State ZIP Phone Fax Email Project Description Disaster Number: 4145 Pre-Application Number: PA-08-CO-4145-RPA-0088 Applicant ID: 123-99123-00 Applicant Name: WELD (COUNTY) Subdivision: Project Number: WELCO11 Standard Project Number/Title: 399 - Road System Damage Please Indicate the Project Type: Neither Alternate nor Improved Application Title: WELD COUNTY CR 61 Category: C. ROADS & BRIDGES Percentage Work Completed? 90.0 As of Date: 11 -09-2013 Comments As described in 44 CFR Section 13.42, applicant must maintain all work-related records for a period of three (3) years from applicant closure (final payment). All records relative to this project worksheet are subject to examination and audit by the State, FEMA, and the Comptroller General of the United States and must reflect work related to disaster specific costs. Attachments Damage Facilities (Part 1 of 2) Facility Site Number Facility Name Address County City State ZIP Previously Action Damaged? 1 WELD COUNTY CR 61 AT north of intersection of CR Weld WELD CO No SOUTH PLATTE RIVER 380/ CR61 Comments https://isource.fema.net/emmie/dispatchDestination.do?menuTile=&topTile=dsHeader&bo. . . 4/ 17/2015 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 3 of 22 Attachments User Date Document Description Hard Copy File Name Action Type File Reference SHIRLEY 11 -09- MAP 1 - CO WELD 4145 CO WELD COUNTY CR SANDERS 2013 Map COUNTY CR 61 FLOOD 61 FLOOD.pdf(2.71 Mb) View BROWN SHIRLEY 11 -09- 4145 CO WELD 4145 CO WELD COUNTY CR SANDERS 2013 Map COUNTY CR 61 OVER 61 OVER PLATTE View BROWN PLATTE composite composite .pdf(2.47 Mb) SHIRLEY 11 -09- 4145 CO WELD 4145 CO WELD COUNTY CR SANDERS 2013 Map COUNTY CR 61 AERIAL 61 AERIAL FLOOD View BROWN FLOOD PHOTO PHOTO.pdf(4.47 Mb) SHIRLEY 11 -09- 4145 CO WELD 4145 CO WELD COUNTY CR SANDERS 2013 Map COUNTY CR 61 FHWA 61 FHWA Roads.pdf(1 .86 Mb) View BROWN Roads Facility Name: WELD COUNTY CR 61 AT SOUTH PLATTE RIVER Address 1 : north of intersection of CR 380/ CR61 Address 2: County: Weld City: WELD State: CO ZIP: Was this site previously damaged? No Percentage Work Completed? 100.00 PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00112(0): north of intersection of CR 380/ CR61 (40.37623, -104.48865) northward to south of intersection CR388/CR61 (40.30023, -104.48889) PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00112(1 ): Location: **`** Version 1 ***** PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00112(0): DAMAGE DESCRIPTION AND DIMENSIONS In DR 4145 Colorado experienced Severe Storms, Flooding, Landslides, and mudslides during the incident period from September 11 through September 30, 2013. The roads of Weld County, which is crossed by the South Platte River, were impacted by floodwaters throughout the county, including loss of pavement, shoulders, culverts, and guard rails. Weld County Road 61 . an asphalt road with gravel shoulders, was flooded over from a location north of intersection of CR 380/ CR61 (40.37623. - 104.48865) northward to south of intersection CR388/CR61 (40.30023, - 104.48889), see map attached. The flood affected area covered approximately 22LF wide asphalt road over approximately 5, 100LF, plus 6LF gravel shoulders each side, to an average depth of 5.5LF, or (34LF x 5, 100LF x 5.5LF) /27 CY/CF, or approximately 35,300 CY of total road volume. A site inspection was performed on 11 /1 /2013, by FEMA Public Assistance https://isource.fema.net/emmie/dispatchDestination.do?menuTile=&topTile=dsHeader&bo. .. 4/ 17/2015 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 4 of 22 Coordinator Eugene May, and Weld County Chief Engineer David Bauer. Floodwaters overtopped the following sections, causing the complete loss of roadway (see map): Location 1 , approx 525LF (START 40. 38753, -104.48887; END 40.38588, - 104.48887) Location 2, approx 150LF (START 40.38420, -104.48885; END 40.38381 , - 104.48883) Location 3, approx 620LF (START 40.38321 , -104.48882; END 40.38151 , - 104.48877) PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00112(1 ): ****" Version 1 *'*** DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES Location: North of intersection of CR 380/CR61 (40.37623, -104.48865) northward to south of intersection CR 388/CR61 (40.30023, -104.48889) Damage Description and Dimensions: Version 0 of the PW documented that work was performed shortly after the flood event in order to accomplish repairs necessary to get the road open. The work was classified as temporary but was listed as Category C - Road, rather than as an emergency category. The work was later categorized as permanent, see below for more discussion on this matter. This version is being written to capture HMP for PW 112. (Version 0 did not include HMP. An HMP was written in early 2014 but was not implemented.) That HMP will be reviewed and updated to reflect actual mitigation work performed in early 2014. There are no Public Assistance scope changes with this version. There is a cost increase of $3,999.95. A meeting was held with FEMA representatives and applicant representatives on 2/9/2015, to discuss PW 112 (and other road PW's). The applicant's representatives included project managers and engineers assigned to the projects since the beginning of the disaster. These representatives confirmed that all work on PW 112 could be classified as permanent. In addition, a review of documents provided by applicant provided no evidence of work necessary to redo or modify temporary repairs in order to make a particular repair permanent. PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00112(0): SCOPE OF WORK TEMPORARY: The Applicant used contract services in a publicly bid contract (notice of competitive bids and award attached) to restore the flood impacted road and shoulders in an expedited construction operation designed to address standing floodwaters at overtopped sections and lost pavement (Location 1 , 2, 3), and the loss of gravel shoulders throughout the contract area to allow vehicular traffic before and during the winter season. The applicant anticipates that these conditions will likely lead to short term wear characteristics of the road structure, which will be revisited by the applicant after the winter season 2013/2014. This sub-grant is written for the temporary road recovery operations as indicated in the attached contract. The approximate measurements in the DAMAGE DESCRIPTION , 35,300CY, https://isource.fema.net/emmie/dispatch Destination.do?menuTile=&topTile=dsHeader&bo.. . 4/ 17/2015 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 5 of 22 result in an average in place cost of accelerated operations at approximately $35CY, or a cost in an order of magnitude scale with temporary emergency road work in flood conditions. The contract, for $1 ,249,082 was awarded to the ROCHE CONSTRUCTORS INC of 361 71ST Avenue, Greeley, CO 80634, phone 970-356-3611 . The contract has accelerated performance specifications that require the opening of the road to vehicular traffic without standard dry road base conditions or compaction, due to the standing flood waters. For these specifications see CHANGE ORDER No1 regarding accelerated schedule in the attached contract, from 40 days to completion to 22 days to completion. All contract sections that refer to Federal Aid Road projects are used for procedures only. The Applicant has provided the Weld County map showing FHWA funded County Roads for 2013 showing the site of the work as being the responsibility and complete funding of Weld County (attached). Future attachments as indicated below in are in the Weld County Department of Public Works: 1 . Signed Base Contract, Oct 2, 2013, and Change Order No. 1 , Accelerated Schedule, dated Oct 7, 2013. 2. Weld Co Commissioners Memo regarding public bids received, Oct 1 , 2013 3. Contract Award Letter Oct 2, 2013, Notice to Proceed, Oct 3, 2013 4. Weld County Map FHWA funded County Roads. Scope of Work: Notify Grantee (CO-OEM)for repairs/ re-work in spring of 2014, to meet current needs and or requirements; 1 . A sub-grant Version (or Amendment) will be written to describe the damage related to permanent road work indicated in this sub-grant for temporary road work, if it is needed by the Applicant. 2. All work to be considered on this site for a FEMA sub-grant for permanent work will be preceded by the necessary FEMA re-inspection of the site and the definition of the damage description for the permanent work. 3. The Applicant will notify FEMA and the State of their intent to perform permanent work related to this site before any work commences in the field. Failure to do so may jeopardize the sub-grant for permanent work related to the temporary work in this sub-grant. PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00112(1 ): ***** Version 1 ***** SCOPE OF WORK Work completed: All work has been completed. Repair & Restoration: (Temporary work later classified as permanent) Roche Construction (attachment: 112(1 ). WELCO11 , CR 61 , Roche Construction work order 1 ) Billed Cost: $1 ,249,081 .95 Estimated amount in Version 0: $1 ,245,082.00 Difference between billed amount and estimate: $1 ,245,082.00 - $ 1 ,249,081 .95 = -$3,999.95 HMP: https://isource.fema.net/emmie/dispatchDestination.do?menuTi le=&topTile=dsHeader&bo. .. 4/ 17/2015 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 6 of 22 An HMP was prepared with Version 0 of PW. but was not processed because the work was repair and restoration work was classified as temporary. The original HMP was estimated to cost $161 ,721 .04, exactly equal to All Cowboy work order 1 . Version 1 will include an updated HMP description because the work is now classified as permanent. HMP construction was completed in early 2014. TRM/Erosion Control All Cowboy Erosion Control, work order 1 (Attachment: 112( 1 ), WELCO11 , CR 61 . All Cowboy work order), refer to Exhibit B. Seeding and placement of turf reinforcement mat (TRM) for $161 ,721 .04. All Cowboy Erosion Control. work order 1 (attachment: 112( 1 ), WELCO11 , CR 61 , All Cowboy Work Order #2), According to applicant engineers during meeting of 2/9/15, this work was required when it was discovered that TRM adjacent to roadway was an unworkable solution and originally constructed. It became necessary to excavated away from the roadway edge a distance into embankment in order to protect the TRM for $41 ,600.00. Change Order (C/O) #2 for the excavation of work in Change Order 1 will not be eligible for funding as the work originally constructed was an unworkable solution, therefore the liability of the Contractor and not disaster related. (2/9/15 FEMA requested an explanation of the C/O #2 invoice that did not detail the work. The documentation has not been submitted to date) Engineering The applicant sought to assure that the repairs were adequate as a permanent installation to withstand the spring runoff during spring of 2014. (During early 2014 there was concern because of high snowpack and other conditions, that another significant flooding event might occur that spring.) Atkins North America was retained during January 2014 to perform engineering services. The scope of services included assessment of repairs. Other services by the firm included project management, structural, geotechnical and hydraulic assessment of the South Platte River Bridge and concrete box culvert, hydraulic analysis, erosion control design, constructability review, property owner coordination and temporary easement acquisition and coordination with applicant staff. The period of performance for Atkins work was identified as January 14, 2014 to March 4, 2014. The firm identified a potential inadequacy on erosion protection along the repaired roadway, recommending that turf reinforcement mat be installed as a mitigation measure. The construction drawings for the TRM contained in the All Cowboy work orders were provided by Atkins. Atkins North America work order (attachment: 112( 1 ), WELCO11 , CR 61 . Atkins Work Order #2) refer to Exhibit B present hourly charges. (A work order #1 was not included.) These services are grouped as engineering, but also include charges for Project Director, Project Mgrs. , Project Scientists, administration, post flood geotech support, permitting, and right of way support for an estimate of $66,990.50. (Version 0 did not account for any of these costs. ) Detailed cost to be submitted at Closeout for eligibility. Engineering for work such as TRM and riprap is not complex. NOTES: This is a large project, in accordance with Section 422 of the Stafford Act and 44CRF 206.203(c)( 1 ) and 206.205(b), payment of claim will be based on eligible actual cost. ( 1 ) This is a large project PW. All costs, associated with this project, must be substantiated. Complete documentation must be furnished by the applicant, through the Governor's Authorized Representative (GAR), when all work is complete by way of a written request for final inspection and review. https://isource.fema.net/emmie/dispatchDestination.do?menuTile=&topTile=dsHeader&bo... 4/ 17/2015 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 7 of 22 (2) Federal funding is contingent upon acquiring all necessary Federal, State and Local permits. Noncompliance with this requirement may jeopardize the receipt of Federal funds. It is the responsibility of the applicant to obtain all required permits prior to the commencement of work. (3) The applicant has been advised of its responsibility to maintain supporting documentation (records). The type of records to be maintained are specified in 44 CFR 13.20(B). -Records must be maintained for 3 years after closure of the grant as required in 44 CFR 13.42. -Because the approved costs for this project may be less than the applicant believes to be necessary for reimbursement, the applicant has a right to appeal this decision and support its request for reimbursement of this project with additional information. The appeal must be submitted to the State of Colorado Division of Emergency Management within 60 days of the applicant's receipt of a notice from the CDEM regarding approval/denial of this project. The applicant has been advised of its responsibility to maintain supporting documentation (records). The type of records to be maintained is specified in 44 CFR 13.20(b). Records must be maintained for 3 years after closure of the grant as required in 44 CFR 13.42. Note: The CO.EMGrants Project #112, Scope Change #23 request was for $226.000.00 Comments and Attachments 112(1 ), WELCO11 , CR 61 , Roche Construction work order 1 112(1 ), WELCO11 , CR 61 , All Cowboy Work Order 112(1 ), WELCO11 , CR 61 , All Cowboy Work Order #2 112(1 ), WELCO11 , CR 61 , Atkins Work Order #2 Hazard Mitigation Proposal Is effective mitigation feasible on this site? Yes If you answered Yes to the above question, the next question is required Will mitigation be performed on this site? Yes If you answered Yes to the above question, the next question is required Do you wish to attach a Hazard Mitigation Proposal? Yes If you answered Yes to the above question, the next two questions are required Please provide the Scope of Work for the estimate: See attached HMP. (maximum 4000 characters) Would you like to add the Hazard Mitigation Yes Proposal as a cost line item to the project cost? Cost Estimates Option(s) that apply to this facility: Hazard Mitigation Proposal : $161 ,721 .04 # Code Material and/or Description Unit Unit of Unit Price Subgrant Type Cost Estimate Quantity Measure Budget Class *** Version 1 *** 1 9999 See HMP for unit costs. 1 LS $ 161 ,721 .04 CONSTRUCTION $ 161 ,721 .04 Facility Level Cost Estimate Total: $ 161 ,721 .04 GIS Coordinates Project Location Latitude Longitude Location 1 40.38588 -104.48887 40.38753 -104.48887 Location 2 40.3842 -104.48885 40.38381 -104.48883 https://isource.fema.net/emmie/dispatchDestination.do?menuTile=&topTile=dsHeader&bo. . . 4/ 17/201 5. Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 8 of 22 Location 3 40.38321 -104.48882 40.38151 -104.48877 Special Considerations 1 . Does the damaged facility or item of work have insurance coverage and/or is it an insurable risk No (e.g. , buildings, equipment, vehicles, etc)? 2. Is the damaged facility located within a floodplain or coastal high hazard area and/or does it have No an impact on a floodplain or wetland? 3. Is the damaged facility or item of work located within or adjacent to a Coastal Barrier Resource No System Unit or an Otherwise Protected Area? 4. Will the proposed facility repairs/reconstruction change the pre-disaster conditions (e.g. , footprint, No material, location, capacity, use of function)? 5. Does the applicant have a hazard mitigation proposal or would the applicant like technical No assistance for a hazard mitigation proposal? 6. Is the damaged facility on the National Register of Historic Places or the state historic listing? Is it No older than 50 years? Are there more, similar buildings near the site? 7. Are there any pristine or undisturbed areas on, or near, the project site? Are there large tracts of No forestland? 8. Are there any hazardous materials at or adjacent to the damaged facility and/or item of work? No 9. Are there any other environmental or controversial issues associated with the damaged facility Yes and/or item of work? If you would like to make any comments, please enter them below. (maximum 4000 characters) Per Regional Guidance, EHP Review is required. Attachments For Category C, D, E, F, and G Projects only Is effective mitigation feasible on this project? Yes If you answered Yes to the above question, the next question is required Will mitigation be performed on any sites in this Yes project? If you answered Yes to the above question, the next question is required Do you wish to attach a Hazard Mitigation Proposal? Yes If you answered Yes to the above question, the next two questions are required VERSION (1 ) Start Latitude 40.38753 Longitude: -104.48887 Ends Latitude: 40.38151 Longitude: -104.48877 Extremely heavy rains and subsequent flooding caused widespread damage to infrastructure in the area during the incident period for DR-4145- CO of Sept. 11 -30, 2013. Flooding at this site caused loss of the asphalt roadway of CR61 where it crosses the Big Thompson River including embankments, culverts, and guardrails for a distance of 4300 feet. . In order to prevent similar damages from a similar event in the future, the applicant is proposing to armor the embankments with: Topsoil 340cy @ $40 pcy $13,600.00 Erosion logs 12" 2001f @ $2.65 plf $ 530.00 Silt fence 1000 If @ $1 .02 plf $ 1 ,020.00 Hydraulic seeding 2.62 Ac @ $1 ,426 pAc $ 3,736. 12 Hydraulic mulching 2.62 Ac @ $1 ,324.50 pAc $ 3,470. 19 TRM Landlock 300 8,341 sy @ $14 psy $116,774.00 Soil retention blanket 8341 sy @ $1 .63 psy $ 12,761 .73 Trafic Control 5 days @ $1 ,389 per day $ 6,900.00 Mobilization 2 days @ $1 ,464.50 per day $ 2,929.00 These line items and costs are listed on the bid proposal from All Cowboy Construction and the total cost is a contracted amount. The proposed erosion control https://isource.fema.net/emmie/dispatchDestination.do?menuTile=&topTile=dsHeader&bo... 4/ 17/2015 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 9 of 22 mitigation measure for the referenced site will be accomplished by installing filter fabric underneath the rip-rap, top-soil to cover the voids and vegetated-mat over the rip-rap to reduce rip-rap displacement and future erosion in similar events. Using this erosion control mitigation technique will also reduce the impact on the Preble's Mouse habitat or range as required by the Endangered Species Act (ESA) & regulations in the state of Colorado. The cost of these mitigation measures is : $161 ,721 .04 The cost of returning the site to predisaster condition is: $1 ,245,082.00 This Hazard Mitigation Proposal (HMP) is 12.99% of the repair and restoration costs. In accordance with FEMA Recovery Policy 9526. 1 , VII .B. 1 , "Mitigation measures may Please provide the Scope of Work amount up to 15% of the total eligible cost of the eligible repair for the estimate: work on a particular project." This HMP is appropriate mitigation, is technically feasible and is cost effective. If this HMP is approved, and the mitigation is not performed, the Applicant must apply for a change in the Scope or Work and de‐obligation of the HMP funding (RE: 9526. 1 .VII .C.). Failure to complete the work of the HMP may limit future FEMA funding of repairs at the site, in the event that a similar disaster event results in similar damage at the site (PA Guide A‐43). This HMP is for estimating purposes only. If the site's final placement and configuration are different than the preliminary estimate, the applicant should submit a change in scope request. This HMP is subject to further review prior to award. Would you like to add the Hazard Mitigation Yes Proposal as a cost line item to the project cost? Hazard Mitigation Proposal - 0909 Unit Unit of Subgrant Cost # Code Material and/or Description Quantity Measure Unit Price Budget Type Estimate Action Class *** Version 1 *** 1 9888 Site 1 WELD COUNTY CR 61 AT 1 LS $ $ Include SOUTH PLATTE RIVER 161 ,721 .04 161 ,721 .04 Total Cost: $ 161 ,721 .04 View Sites Comments The Scope of Work is Temporary Work. Attachments Cost Estimate Is this Project Worksheet for (Preferred) Repair Material Unit Unit of Subgrant Sequence Code and/or Quantity Measure Unit Price Budget Class Type Cost Estimate Action Description ESTIMATE 1 9999 TORPORARY 1 LS 1 ,245,082.00 CONTRACTUAL $ 1 ,245,082.00 REPAIRS *** Version 1 *** Work Completed https://isource.fema.net/emmie/dispatchDestination.do?menuTile=&topTile=dsHeader&bo... 4/ 17/2015 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 10 of 22 CONTRACT - 2 9999 Cost Overrun 1 LS $ 3,999.95 Work $ 3,999.95 for Roche Completed Construction CONTRACT - 3 9999 Engineering 1 LS $ 66,990.50 Work $ 66,990.50 Atkins North Completed America Other 4 0000 Work Completed Other $ 0.00 Total Cost : $ 1 ,316,072.45 Insurance Adjustments (Deductibles, Proceeds and Settlements) - 5900/5901 Unit Unit of Unit Subgrant Cost Sequence Code Material and/or Description Quantity Measure Price Budget Type Estimate Action Class Total Cost : $ 0.00 Hazard Mitigation Proposal - 0909 Unit Unit of Subgrant Cost Sequence Code Material and/or Description Quantity Measure Unit Price Budget Type Estimate Action Class *** Version 1 *** Site 1 WELD COUNTY CR 1 9888 61 AT SOUTH PLATTE 1 LS 161 ,721 .04 $ 161 ,721 .04 Include RIVER Total Cost : $ 161 ,721 .04 Total Cost Estimate: $ 1 ,477,793.49 (Preferred Estimate Type + Insurance Adjustments + Hazard Mitigation Proposal) Comments Attachments User Date Document Description Hard Copy File File Name Action Type Reference SHIRLEY 11 09- Contract Signed Base Contract 4145 CO WELD COUNTY SANDERS 11 -02-2013 & Change CR 61 CONTRACT.pdf(4.79 View BROWN 2013 Document Order 1 Mb) Existing Insurance Information Insurance Type Policy No. Bldg/Property Content Insurance Deductible Years Amount Amount Amount Amount Required Comments Attachments Comments and Attachments Name of Section Comment Attachment https://isource.fema.net/emmie/dispatchDestination.do?menuTi le=&topTile=dsHeader&bo... 4/17/2015 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 11 of 22 As described in 44 CFR Section 13.42, applicant must maintain all work- related records for a period of three (3) years from applicant closure Project Description (final payment). All records relative to this project worksheet are subject to examination and audit by the State. FEMA, and the Comptroller General of the United States and must reflect work related to disaster specific costs. 4145 CO WELD COUNTY CR 61 FLOOD.pdf 4145 CO WELD COUNTY CR 61 OVER Damage Facilities PLATTE composite .pdf 4145 CO WELD COUNTY CR 61 AERIAL FLOOD PHOTO.pdf 4145 CO WELD COUNTY CR 61 FHWA Roads.pdf Mitigation The Scope of Work is Temporary Work. 4145 CO WELD Cost Estimate COUNTY CR 61 CONTRACT.pdf 4145 CO WELD COUNTY CR 61 OVER PLATTE DDD SOW draft.doc PA-08-CO-4145-PW- 00112(0' CR 61 Signature Sheet.pdf PW 112 - Entire Application.pdf AMEND - Log Item 15-10- 4145 - PW 112.pdf PW 112;1 ), WELCO11 , CR 61 , Roche Constr work order 1 .pdf Form 90-91 PW 112(1 ), WELCO11 , CR 61 , All Cowboy Work Order.pdf PW 112;1 ), WELCO11 , CR 61 , All Cowboy Work Order #2.pdf PW 112'1 ), WELCO11 , CR 61 , Atkins Work Order #2.pdf PW 112'1 ), WELCO11 , CR 61 , combined comments and attachments.pdf PW 112 VERSION 1 Cover Sheet.docx Bundle Reference # (Amendment #) Date Awarded PA-08-CO-4145-State-0105(106) 04-16-2015 Subgrant Application - FEMA Form 90-91 Note: The Effective Cost Share for this application is 75% FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY https://isource.fema.net/emmie/dispatchDestination.do?menuTile=&topTile=dsHeader&bo... 4/ 17/2015 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 12 of 22 PROJECT WORKSHEET DISASTER PROJECT NO. PA ID NO. DATE CATEGORY WELCO11 123-99123- 03-05-2015 C FEMA 4145 - DR -CO 00 APPLICANT: WELD (COUNTY) WORK COMPLETE AS OF: 11-09-2013 : 90 % Site 1 of 1 DAMAGED FACILITY: COUNTY: Weld WELD COUNTY CR 61 AT SOUTH PLATTE RIVER LOCATION: LATITUDE: LONGITUDE: 40.38151 -104.48877 PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00112(0): 40.38321 -104.48882 north of intersection of CR 380/ CR61 (40.37623, -104.48865) northward to south of intersection 40.38381 -104.48883 CR388/CR61 (40.30023, -104.48889) 40.3842 -104.48885 PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00112(1 ): 40.38588 -104.48887 ***** Version 1 ***** 40.38753 -104.48887 Current Version: DAMAGE DESCRIPTION AND DIMENSIONS: PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00112(0): DAMAGE DESCRIPTION AND DIMENSIONS In DR 4145 Colorado experienced Severe Storms, Flooding, Landslides, and mudslides during the incident period from September 11 through September 30, 2013. The roads of Weld County, which is crossed by the South Platte River, were impacted by floodwaters throughout the county, including loss of pavement, shoulders, culverts, and guard rails. Weld County Road 61, an asphalt road with gravel shoulders, was flooded over from a location north of intersection of CR 380/ CR61 (40.37623, - 104.48865) northward to south of intersection CR388/CR61 (40.30023, -104.48889), see map attached. The flood affected area covered approximately 22LF wide asphalt road over approximately 5,100LF, plus 6LF gravel shoulders each side, to an average depth of 5.5LF, or (34LF x 5,100LF x 5.5LF) /27 CY/CF, or approximately 35,300 CY of total road volume. A site inspection was performed on 11/1/2013, by FEMA Public Assistance Coordinator Eugene May, and Weld County Chief Engineer David Bauer. Floodwaters overtopped the following sections, causing the complete loss of roadway (see map): Location 1, approx 525LF (START 40.38753, -104.48887; END 40.38588, -104.48887) Location 2, approx 150LF (START 40.38420, -104.48885; END 40.38381, -104.48883) Location 3, approx 620LF (START 40.38321 , -104.48882; END 40.38151, -104.48877) PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00112(1 ): Version 1 ***** DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES Location: North of intersection of CR 380/CR61 (40.37623, -104.48865) northward to south of intersection CR 388/CR61 (40.30023, -104.48889) Version 0 of the PW documented that work was performed shortly after the flood event in order to accomplish repairs necessary to get the road open. The work was classified as temporary but was listed as Category C — Road, rather than as an emergency category. The work was later categorized as permanent, see below for more discussion on this matter. This version is being written to capture HMP for PW 112. (Version 0 did not include HMP. An HMP was written in early 2014 but was not implemented.) That HMP will be reviewed and updated to reflect actual mitigation work performed in early 2014. There are no Public Assistance scope changes with this version. There is a cost increase of $3,999.95. A meeting was held with FEMA representatives and applicant representatives on 2/9/2015, to discuss PW 112 (and other road PW's). The applicant's representatives included project managers and engineers assigned to the projects since the beginning of the disaster. These representatives confirmed that all work on PW 112 could be classified as permanent. In addition, a review of documents provided by applicant provided no evidence of work necessary to redo or modify temporary repairs in order to make a particular repair permanent. Current Version: SCOPE OF WORK: PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00112(0): SCOPE OF WORK TEMPORARY: The Applicant used contract services in a publicly bid contract (notice of competitive bids and award attached) to restore the flood impacted road and shoulders in an expedited construction operation designed to address standing floodwaters at overtopped sections and lost pavement (Location 1 , 2, 3), and the loss of gravel shoulders throughout the contract area to allow vehicular traffic before and during the winter season. https://isource.fema.net/emmie/dispatchDestination.do?menuTile=&topTile=dsHeader&bo. . . 4/ 17/2015 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 13 of 22 The applicant anticipates that these conditions will likely lead to short term wear characteristics of the road structure, which will be revisited by the applicant after the winter season 2013/2014. This sub-grant is written for the temporary road recovery operations as indicated in the attached contract. The approximate measurements in the DAMAGE DESCRIPTION, 35,300CY, result in an average in place cost of accelerated operations at approximately $35CY, or a cost in an order of magnitude scale with temporary emergency road work in flood conditions. The contract, for $1 ,249,082 was awarded to the ROCHE CONSTRUCTORS INC of 361 71ST Avenue, Greeley, CO 80634, phone 970-356-3611 . The contract has accelerated performance specifications that require the opening of the road to vehicular traffic without standard dry road base conditions or compaction, due to the standing flood waters. For these specifications see CHANGE ORDER No1 regarding accelerated schedule in the attached contract, from 40 days to completion to 22 days to completion. All contract sections that refer to Federal Aid Road projects are used for procedures only. The Applicant has provided the Weld County map showing FHWA funded County Roads for 2013 showing the site of the work as being the responsibility and complete funding of Weld County (attached). Future attachments as indicated below in are in the Weld County Department of Public Works: 1 . Signed Base Contract, Oct 2, 2013, and Change Order No.1 , Accelerated Schedule, dated Oct 7, 2013. 2. Weld Co Commissioners Memo regarding public bids received, Oct 1, 2013 3. Contract Award Letter Oct 2, 2013, Notice to Proceed, Oct 3, 2013 4. Weld County Map FHWA funded County Roads. Notify Grantee (CO-OEM)for repairs/ re-work in spring of 2014, to meet current needs and or requirements; 1 . A sub-grant Version (or Amendment) will be written to describe the damage related to permanent road work indicated in this sub-grant for temporary road work, if it is needed by the Applicant. 2. All work to be considered on this site for a FEMA sub-grant for permanent work will be preceded by the necessary FEMA re-inspection of the site and the definition of the damage description for the permanent work. 3. The Applicant will notify FEMA and the State of their intent to perform permanent work related to this site before any work commences in the field. Failure to do so may jeopardize the sub-grant for permanent work related to the temporary work in this sub-grant. PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00112(1 ): """ Version 1 SCOPE OF WORK Work completed: All work has been completed. Repair & Restoration: (Temporary work later classified as permanent) Roche Construction (attachment: 112(1 ), WELCO11 , CR 61 , Roche Construction work order 1 ) Billed Cost: $1 ,249,081 .95 Estimated amount in Version 0: $1 ,245,082.00 Difference between billed amount and estimate: $1 ,245,082.00 - $1 ,249,081.95 = -$3,999.95 HMP: An HMP was prepared with Version 0 of PW, but was not processed because the work was repair and restoration work was classified as temporary. The original HMP was estimated to cost $161,721.04, exactly equal to All Cowboy work order 1 . Version 1 will include an updated HMP description because the work is now classified as permanent. HMP construction was completed in early 2014. TRM/Erosion Control All Cowboy Erosion Control, work order 1 (Attachment: 112(1 ), WELCO11 , CR 61, All Cowboy work order), refer to Exhibit B. Seeding and placement of turf reinforcement mat (TRM) for $161,721.04. All Cowboy Erosion Control, work order 1 (attachment: 112(1), WELCO11 , CR 61 , All Cowboy Work Order #2), According to applicant engineers during meeting of 2/9/15, this work was required when it was discovered that TRM adjacent to roadway was an unworkable solution and originally constructed. It became necessary to excavated away from the roadway edge a distance into embankment in order to protect the TRM for $41 ,600.00. Change Order (C/O) #2 for the excavation of work in Change Order 1 will not be eligible for funding as the work originally constructed was an unworkable solution, therefore the liability of the Contractor and not disaster related. (2/9/15 FEMA requested an explanation of the C/O #2 invoice that did not detail the work. The documentation has not been submitted to date) Engineering The applicant sought to assure that the repairs were adequate as a permanent installation to withstand the spring runoff during spring of 2014. (During early 2014 there was concern because of high snowpack and other conditions, that another significant flooding event might occur that spring.) Atkins North America was retained during January 2014 to perform engineering services. The scope of services included assessment of repairs. Other services by the firm included project management, structural, geotechnical and hydraulic assessment of the South Platte River Bridge and concrete box culvert, hydraulic analysis, erosion control design, constructability review, property owner coordination and temporary easement acquisition and https://isource.fema.net/emm ie/dispatchDestination.do?menuTile=&topTi le=dsHeader&bo... 4/ 17/2015 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 14 of 22 coordination with applicant staff. The period of performance for Atkins work was identified as January 14, 2014 to March 4, 2014. The firm identified a potential inadequacy on erosion protection along the repaired roadway, recommending that turf reinforcement mat be installed as a mitigation measure. The construction drawings for the TRM contained in the All Cowboy work orders were provided by Atkins. Atkins North America work order (attachment: 112(1 ), WELCO11 , CR 61 , Atkins Work Order #2) refer to Exhibit B present hourly charges. (A work order #1 was not included.) These services are grouped as engineering, but also include charges for Project Director, Project Mgrs., Project Scientists, administration, post flood geotech support, permitting, and right of way support for an estimate of $66,990.50. (Version 0 did not account for any of these costs.) Detailed cost to be submitted at Closeout for eligibility. Engineering for work such as TRM and riprap is not complex. NOTES: This is a large project, in accordance with Section 422 of the Stafford Act and 44CRF 206.203(c)(1 ) and 206.205(b), payment of claim will be based on eligible actual cost. (1 ) This is a large project PW. All costs, associated with this project, must be substantiated. Complete documentation must be furnished by the applicant, through the Governor's Authorized Representative (GAR), when all work is complete by way of a written request for final inspection and review. (2) Federal funding is contingent upon acquiring all necessary Federal, State and Local permits. Noncompliance with this requirement may jeopardize the receipt of Federal funds. It is the responsibility of the applicant to obtain all required permits prior to the commencement of work. (3) The applicant has been advised of its responsibility to maintain supporting documentation (records). The type of records to be maintained are specified in 44 CFR 13.20(6). -Records must be maintained for 3 years after closure of the grant as required in 44 CFR 13.42. -Because the approved costs for this project may be less than the applicant believes to be necessary for reimbursement, the applicant has a right to appeal this decision and support its request for reimbursement of this project with additional information. The appeal must be submitted to the State of Colorado Division of Emergency Management within 60 days of the applicant's receipt of a notice from the CDEM regarding approval/denial of this project. The applicant has been advised of its responsibility to maintain supporting documentation (records). The type of records to be maintained is specified in 44 CFR 13.20(b). Records must be maintained for 3 years after closure of the grant as required in 44 CFR 13.42. Note: The CO.EMGrants Project #112, Scope Change #23 request was for $226.000.00 Comments and Attachments 112(1 ), WELCO11 , CR 61 , Roche Construction work order 1 112(1 ), WELCO11 , CR 61 , All Cowboy Work Order 112(1 ), WELCO11 , CR 61 , All Cowboy Work Order #2 112(1 ), WELCO11 , CR 61 , Atkins Work Order #2 Current Version: Does the Scope of Work change the pre-disaster conditions at the site? Yes No Special Considerations included? 0 Yes D No Hazard Mitigation proposal included? 1 Yes 7 No Is there insurance coverage on this facility? 7 Yes 7, No PROJECT COST ITEM CODE NARRATIVE QUANTITY/UNIT UNIT PRICE COST 1 9999 ESTIMATE FOR TEMPORARY 1/LS $ 1 ,245,082.00 $ 1 ,245,082.00 REPAIRS ' Version 1 ' Work Completed 2 9999 CONTRACT - Cost Overrun for 1/LS $ 3,999.95 $ 3,999.95 Roche Construction 3 9999 CONTRACT - Engineering Atkins 1/LS $ 66,990.50 $ 66,990.50 North America Other 4 0000 Work Completed OILS $ 0.00 $ 0.00 5 0909 Hazard Mitigation Proposal 1/LS $ 161 ,721 .04 $ 161 ,721 .04 TOTAL COST $ 1 ,477,793.49 PREPARED BY Iris Spanski TITLE PACL SIGNATURE APPLICANT REP. Roy Rudisill TITLE Director - OEM SIGNATURE WELD (COUNTY) : PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00112 Conditions Information https://isource.fema.net/emmie/dispatchDestination.do?menuTile=&topTile=dsHeader&bo. . . 4/ 17/2015 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 15 of 22 Review Name Condition Type Condition Name Description Monitored Status Any change to the approved scope of Final Review Other (EHP) Standard work will require re-evaluation for No Approved Condition #1 compliance with NEPA and other Laws and Executive Orders. This review does not address all federal, state and local requirements. Acceptance of federal funding requires Final Review Other (EHP) Standard recipient to comply with all federal, No Approved Condition #2 state and local laws. Failure to obtain all appropriate federal, state and local environmental permits and clearances may jeopardize federal funding. Any change to the approved scope of Final Review Other (EHP) Standard work will require re-evaluation for No Approved Condition #1 compliance with NEPA and other Laws and Executive Orders. Applicant is responsible for Executive Order coordinating with the local floodplain Final Review Other (EHP) 11988 - manager. All required permits should No Approved Floodplains be maintained as part of the permanent record. The applicant is responsible for verifying and compliance with all permit requirements, including permit conditions, pre-construction notification requirements and regional conditions as provided by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE). The applicant is responsible for implementing, Final Review Other (EHP) Clean Water Act monitoring, and maintaining all Best No Approved (CWA) Management Practices (BMP's) and Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) conditions of applicable Nation Wide Permits (NWP). This is to include any requirements per the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment 401 Water Quality Certification for Clean Water Act permits. Final Review Other (EHP) (CW Clean Act No Approved The applicant is responsible for verifying and compliance with all permit requirements, including permit conditions, pre-construction notification requirements and regional conditions as provided by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE). The applicant is responsible for implementing, Final Review Other (EHP) Clean Water Act monitoring, and maintaining all Best No Approved (CWA) Management Practices (BMP's) and Pre-Construction Notification (PCN ) conditions of applicable Nation Wide Permits (NWP). This is to include any requirements per the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment 401 Water Quality Certification for Clean Water Act permits. Applicant is responsible for https://isource.fema.net/emmie/dispatchDestination.do?menuTile=&topTile=dsHeader&bo. .. 4/17/2015 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 16 of 22 Executive Order coordinating with the local floodplain Final Review Other (EHP) 11988 manager. All required permits should No Approved Floodplains be maintained as part of the permanent record. If ground disturbing activities occur during construction, applicant will Standard monitor ground disturbance and if any Final Review Other (EHP) Condition #3 potential archeological resources are No Approved discovered, will immediately cease construction in that area and notify the State and FEMA. This review does not address all federal, state and local requirements. Acceptance of federal funding requires Final Review Other (EHP) Standard recipient to comply with all federal, No Approved Condition #2 state and local laws. Failure to obtain all appropriate federal, state and local environmental permits and clearances may jeopardize federal funding. If ground disturbing activities occur during construction, applicant will Standard monitor ground disturbance and if any Final Review Other (EHP) Condition #3 potential archeological resources are No Approved discovered, will immediately cease construction in that area and notify the State and FEMA. If ground disturbing activities occur during construction, applicant will Standard monitor ground disturbance and if any EHP Review Other (EHP) Condition #3 potential archeological resources are No Recommended discovered, will immediately cease construction in that area and notify the State and FEMA. This review does not address all federal , state and local requirements. Acceptance of federal funding requires EHP Review Other (EHP) Standard recipient to comply with all federal, No Recommended Condition #2 state and local laws. Failure to obtain all appropriate federal, state and local environmental permits and clearances may jeopardize federal funding. Any change to the approved scope of EHP Review Other (EHP) Standard work will require re-evaluation for No Recommended Condition #1 compliance with NEPA and other Laws and Executive Orders. Applicant is responsible for Executive Order coordinating with the local floodplain EHP Review Other (EHP) 11988 - manager. All required permits should No Recommended Floodplains be maintained as part of the permanent record. The applicant is responsible for verifying and compliance with all permit requirements, including permit conditions, pre-construction notification Clean Water Act requirements and regional conditions EHP Review Other (EHP) (CWA) as provided by the US Army Corps of No Recommended Engineers (USAGE). The applicant is responsible for implementing, monitoring, and maintaining all Best Management Practices (BMP's) and Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) https://isource.fema.net/emmie/dispatch Destination.do'?menuTile=&topTile=dsHeader&bo. .. 4/ 17/2015 i Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 17 of 22 conditions of applicable Nation Wide Permits (NWP). This is to include any requirements per the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment 401 Water Quality Certification for Clean Water Act permits. EHP Review Other (EHP) (CI WA)Water Act No Recommended Internal Comments No. Queue User Date/Time Reviewer Comments 3/27/15 Final Review included. All documentation submitted 03-27-2015 was reviewed for reconciliation of version. C/O #2 was not 32 Final Review SPANSKI IRIS 06:50 PM reimbursed at this time, justification of work to correct C/O #1 GMT work for mitigation was clarified. Temporary road repairs were determined to be permanent work. The A&E addressed the repairs and mitigation in this PW. ISpanski. 03-27-2015 Mitigation queue not selected during review process. HMP 31 Final Review SPANSKI IRIS 02:26 PM staff requested queue be added. GMT STECK 03-24-2015 Mitigation queue not selected during review process. HMP 30 Final Review MELANIE GMT PM staff requested queue be added. This version is being written to capture HMP at Site 1 WELD COUNTY CR 61 AT SOUTH PLATTE RIVER for PW 112. (Version 0 did not include HMP. An HMP was written in early 2014 but was not implemented.) An HMP was prepared with Grantee 03-24-2015 Version 0 of PW, but was not processed because the work 29 Review PATEL KAJAL 08:35 PM was repair and restoration work was classified as temporary. GMT The original HMP was estimated to cost $161 ,721 .04, exactly equal to 'All Cowboy' work order 1 . Version 1 will include an updated HMP description because the work is now classified as permanent. HMP construction was completed in early 2014. There is a project cost overrun of $3,999.95. All costs incurred by the applicant are a direct result of the declared incident. NOTE: Cat. C PW addresses temporary repairs of a permanent nature. Also project indicates the Grantee 03-24-2015 applicant anticipates additional work in the spring as repairs 28 PATEL KAJAL 08:21 PM were emergency in nature to expedite the opening to have Review GMT road access during the winter months. All costs associated with the emergency temporary repair and permanent restoration of this facility should be documented and submitted during the final inspection/reconcilation. JMitchell Cat C, 90%, Weld County, CR 61 at South Platte River, 3 locations totaling approx 1 mile in length. Applicant used contract services for temporary road recovery. Contractor restored flood-damaged road and shoulders in an expedited construction operation designed to address standing floodwaters at overtopped sections, lost pavement, and gravel shoulders and allow vehicular traffic before and during winter season. Expedited repairs may wear poorly and need additional work after winter season. - dpostma - 11 /14/2013 14:30:36 GMT *****VERSION 1 ****'Road work reflected on version 0 was done in an emergency capacity, but not classified as Category A or B - supposed to be temporary repairs, but instead were deemed permanent. This version was written to capture construction contractor cost overrun and engineering consultation that was completed after the road repair work was https://isource.fema.net/emmie/dispatchDestination.do?menuTile=&topTile=dsHeader&bo... 4/ 17/2015 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 18 of 22 done. Mitigation — None. - mserour - 03/17/2015 16:30:41 GMT *****VERSION 1 REVISED***** 100% Completed. Road work reflected on version 0 was done in an emergency capacity, but not classified as Category A or B — supposed to be temporary repairs, but instead were deemed permanent. Version 1 was written to capture construction contractor cost overruns, engineering consultation that was completed after the road repair work was done, and proposed mitigation measures. Mitigation — Applicant has proposed to armor the embankments of WCR 61 with: 340 cubic yards (cy) of topsoil, 200 linear feet (If) of erosion logs, 1000 If of silt fencing, 2.62 acres (Ac) of hydraulic seeding, 2.62 Ac of hydraulic mulching, 8, 341 square yards (sy) of turf reinforcement mat (TRF), 8,341 sy of soil retention blanket, five days of traffic control, and two days of mobilization. The proposed erosion control mitigation measure for the referenced site will be accomplished by installing filter fabric underneath rip-rap, depositing topsoil to cover the voids, and placing a vegetative mat over the rip-rap to reduce rock displacement and , thus, future erosion. - mserour - 03/18/2015 16:59: 19 GMT Project activities have the potential to impact Waters of the United States or wetlands. Project involves dredge, fill , excavation and/or modification. - dpostma - 11/14/2013 14:42:50 GMT 03-18-2015 Project site work is in mapped wetlands. Per 44 CFR Part 9.5 27 EHP Review ROSS PORTIA 06:54 PM (g) Step 1 : Project repairs are determined to have no effect on GMT floodplain or wetlands provided that the repairs remain in the existing footprint and do not impact previously undisturbed areas. No further wetlands or floodplains review is required. - dpostma - 11 /14/2013 15:05:57 GMT Entire community benefits from project. - dpostma - 11 /14/2013 15:06:24 GMT Threatened and Endangered Species occur in this county but the type of activity proposed on this Project Worksheet has been determined to have "no effect" on the species. - dpostma - 11 /14/2013 14:41 :08 GMT Portions of project are located in Zone A, FIRM panel 0802660675C. Per 44 CFR Part 9.5 (g) Step 1 : Project repairs are determined to have no effect on floodplain or wetlands provided that the repairs remain in the existing footprint and do not impact previously undisturbed areas. No further floodplains review is required. - dpostma - 11 /14/2013 15:00:28 GMT All work will take place within previously disturbed ROW. Action meets criteria of FEMA Sec. 106 PA (4/23/13), Appendix B, Section III A and USACE Sec. 106 PA (9/24/13) Stipulations, Parts II and III . - dpostma - 11 /14/2013 14:39:58 GMT **.**VERSION 1 *""*The scope of work has been reviewed and meets the criteria of the September, 24, 2014 signed Programmatic Agreement, First Tier Allowances - Item Number C (1a)(1d); Second Tier Allowances - Item Number A (1a) agreed to by FEMA and the SHPO. - mserour - 03/18/2015 17:07:27 GMT 03-18-2015 Mitigation SHUGART This HMP is cost effective and technically feasible. -Mark 26 Review MARK GMT PM Shugart 3/18/2015 Insurance JOHNSON 03-17-2015 VERSION 1 - The addition of the Hazard Mitigation will not 25 Review KENNETH 07:36 PM alter the prior insurance policy coverage comments or the GMT insurance requirement comments. Insurance JOHNSON 03-17-2015 VERSION 1 - The addition of the Hazard Mitigation will not 24 07:26 PM alter the prior insurance policy coverage comments or the Review KENNETH GMT insurance requirement comments. https://isource.fema.net/emmie/dispatchDestination.do?menuTile=&topTile=dsHeader&bo. .. 4/ 17/2015 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 19 of 22 Mitigation SHUGART 03-17-2015 No HMP is included in Version 1 . If applicant supplies 23 Review MARK06:56 PM documentation an HMP could be added in a later version. GMT Mark W. Petitt, 406 Specialist Initial Review SHUGART 03-17-2015 22 EHP Rework) MARK 06:55 PM Rework to Mitigation to add HMP. GMT Cat C, 90%, Weld County, CR 61 at South Platte River, 3 locations totaling approx 1 mile in length. Applicant used contract services for temporary road recovery. Contractor restored flood-damaged road and shoulders in an expedited construction operation designed to address standing floodwaters at overtopped sections, lost pavement, and gravel shoulders and allow vehicular traffic before and during winter season. Expedited repairs may wear poorly and need additional work after winter season. - dpostma - 11/14/2013 14:30:36 GMT Project activities have the potential to impact Waters of the United States or wetlands. Project involves dredge, fill , excavation and/or modification. - dpostma - 11/14/2013 14:42:50 GMT Project site work is in mapped wetlands. Per 44 CFR Part 9.5 (g) Step 1 : Project repairs are determined to have no effect on floodplain or wetlands provided that the repairs remain in the 03-17-2015 existing footprint and do not impact previously undisturbed 21 EHP Review ROSS PORTIA 05:22 PM areas. No further wetlands or floodplains review is required. - GMT dpostma - 11/14/2013 15:05:57 GMT Entire community benefits from project. - dpostma - 11 /14/2013 15:06:24 GMT Threatened and Endangered Species occur in this county but the type of activity proposed on this Project Worksheet has been determined to have "no effect" on the species. - dpostma - 11 /14/2013 14:41 :08 GMT Portions of project are located in Zone A, FIRM panel 0802660675C. Per 44 CFR Part 9.5 (g) Step 1 : Project repairs are determined to have no effect on floodplain or wetlands provided that the repairs remain in the existing footprint and do not impact previously undisturbed areas. No further floodplains review is required. - dpostma - 11 /14/2013 15:00:28 GMT All work will take place within previously disturbed ROW. Action meets criteria of FEMA Sec. 106 PA (4/23/13), Appendix B, Section III A and USACE Sec. 106 PA (9/24/13) Stipulations, Parts II and III . - dpostma - 11 /14/2013 14:39:58 GMT Cat C, 90%, Weld County, CR 61 at South Platte River, 3 locations totaling approx 1 mile in length. Applicant used contract services for temporary road recovery. Contractor restored flood-damaged road and shoulders in an expedited construction operation designed to address standing floodwaters at overtopped sections, lost pavement, and gravel shoulders and allow vehicular traffic before and during winter season. Expedited repairs may wear poorly and need 03- 17-2015 additional work after winter season. - dpostma - 11 /14/2013 20 EHP Review SEROUR MARK 03:57 PM 14:30:36 GMT GMT Project activities have the potential to impact Waters of the United States or wetlands. Project involves dredge, fill , excavation and/or modification. - dpostma - 11/14/2013 14:42:50 GMT Project site work is in mapped wetlands. Per 44 CFR Part 9.5 (g) Step 1 : Project repairs are determined to have no effect on floodplain or wetlands provided that the repairs remain in the existing footprint and do not impact previously undisturbed areas. No further wetlands or floodplains review is required. - dpostma - 11/14/2013 15:05:57 GMT https://isource.fema.net/emmie/dispatchDestination .do''menuTile=&topTile=dsHeader&bo... 4/ 17/2015 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 20 of 22 Entire community benefits from project. - dpostma - 11 /14/2013 15:06:24 GMT Threatened and Endangered Species occur in this county but the type of activity proposed on this Project Worksheet has been determined to have "no effect" on the species. - dpostma - 11 /14/2013 14:41 :08 GMT Portions of project are located in Zone A, FIRM panel 0802660675C. Per 44 CFR Part 9.5 (g) Step 1 : Project repairs are determined to have no effect on floodplain or wetlands provided that the repairs remain in the existing footprint and do not impact previously undisturbed areas. No further floodplains review is required. - dpostma - 11 /14/2013 15:00:28 GMT All work will take place within previously disturbed ROW. Action meets criteria of FEMA Sec. 106 PA (4/23/13), Appendix B, Section III A and USAGE Sec. 106 PA (9/24/13) Stipulations, Parts II and III . - dpostma - 11 /14/2013 14:39:58 GMT Mitigation 03-05-2015 No HMP is included in Version 1 . If applicant supplies 19 PETITT MARK 09:02 PM documentation an HMP could be added in a later version. Review GMT Mark W. Petitt, 406 Specialist Insurance JOHNSON 03-05-2015 VERSION 1 — The addition of the Hazard Mitigation will not 18 08:53 PM alter the prior insurance policy coverage comments or the Review KENNETH GMT insurance requirement comments. A review of the documentation provided has identified that Weld County is insured for property damages through; Colorado Counties Casualty and Property Pool, Policy Number 020412751 . This policy does not provide coverage for dams, dikes, Insurance JOHNSON 03-05-2015 bridges, culverts, roadways, streets, walks, paved surfaces, 17 Review KENNETH 08:46 PM tunnels, canals, land. GMT The insurance policy will not provide coverage for costs identified in this PW There will not an insurance reduction for this PW. The FEMA eligible damages are not to building, contents, equipment, or vehicles; therefore, there will not be an insurance commitment required. 11/18/13 As per PW, "the SOW will be revisited by the applicant after the winter season 2013/2014. This sub-grant is Mitigation 03-05-2015 written for the temporary road recovery operations." 16 PETITT MARK 08:45 PM Therefore, when this project is revisited in Spring 2014. Review GMT mitigation opportunities will be explored with the applicant, State, and FEMA with regard to the final permanent work written up. J.Malone/406 03-05-2015 Inital review complete. 15 Initial Review STECK 08:23 PM MELANIE GMT 3/5/15: Initial Review of Version 1 complete - appears eligible. HMP to be added by Mitigation in queue. M Steck SCHNEIDER 03-05-2015 14 Initial Review STEFANIE 07:59 PM Inital review complete. GMT SCHNEIDER 03-05-2015 13 Initial Review STEFANIE 07:55 PM Inital review complete. GMT 11 -19-2013 12 Award Review SYSTEM 05:45 PM ACCEPTED GMT 11 /18/13 As per PW, "the SOW will be revisited by the 11 -18-2013 applicant after the winter season 2013/2014. This sub-grant is 11 Mitigation MALONE JACK 05: 18 PM written for the temporary road recovery operations." Review GMT Therefore, when this project is revisited in Spring 2014, mitigation opportunities will be explored with the applicant, https://isource.fema.net/emmie/dispatchDestination.do?menu Tile=&topTile=dsHeader&bo. . . 4/ 17/2015 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 21 of 22 State, and FEMA with regard to the final permanent work written up. J.Malone/406 DOTSON LEIGH 11 18 2013 Mitigation queue not selected during review process. HMP 10 Final Review ANDREA GMT PM staff requested queue be added. DOTSON LEIGH 11 -18-2013 9 Final Review ANDREA 05:04 PM Mitigation review not selected. GMT DOTSON LEIGH 11 -18-2013 8 Final Review ANDREA 05:04 PM Mitigation review not selected. GMT 11 -18-2013 11 /18/13. Additional comments have been inserted in SOW for FRICKEY this PW as requested. 7 Final Review WILLIAM GMT PM This Project Worksheet is recommended for funding. Bill Frickey, TFL DOTSON LEIGH 11 -16-2013 6 Final Review ANDREA 07:20 PM Project needs comments added. GMT DOTSON LEIGH 11 -16-2013 5 Final Review ANDREA 07: 15 PM Project needs comments added. GMT All costs incurred by the applicant are a direct result of the declared incident. NOTE : Cat. C PW addresses temporary repairs of a permanent nature. Also project indicates the Grantee MITCHELL- 11 -16-2013 applicant anticipates additional work in the spring as repairs 4 01 :57 AM were emergency in nature to expedite the opening to have Review JONES JESSICA GMT road access during the winter months. All costs associated with the emergency temporary repair and permanent restoration of this facility should be documented and submitted during the final inspection/reconcilation. JMitchell Cat C, 90%, Weld County, CR 61 at South Platte River, 3 locations totaling approx 1 mile in length. Applicant used contract services for temporary road recovery. Contractor restored flood-damaged road and shoulders in an expedited construction operation designed to address standing floodwaters at overtopped sections, lost pavement, and gravel shoulders and allow vehicular traffic before and during winter season. Expedited repairs may wear poorly and need additional work after winter season. - dpostma - 11 /14/2013 14:30:36 GMT Project activities have the potential to impact Waters of the United States or wetlands. Project involves dredge, fill , excavation and/or modification. - dpostma - 11/14/2013 14:42:50 GMT MYERS 11 -14-2013 Project site work is in mapped wetlands. Per 44 CFR Part 9.5 3 EHP Review RICHARD 07:42 PM (g) Step 1 : Project repairs are determined to have no effect on floodplain or wetlands provided that the repairs remain in the existing footprint and do not impact previously undisturbed areas. No further wetlands or floodplains review is required. - dpostma - 11 /14/2013 15:05:57 GMT Entire community benefits from project. - dpostma - 11 /14/2013 15:06:24 GMT Threatened and Endangered Species occur in this county but the type of activity proposed on this Project Worksheet has been determined to have "no effect" on the species. - dpostma - 11 /14/2013 14:41 :08 GMT Portions of project are located in Zone A, FIRM panel 0802660675C. Per 44 CFR Part 9.5 (g) Step 1 : Project repairs are determined to have no effect on floodplain or wetlands provided that the repairs remain in the existing footprint and do not impact previously undisturbed areas. No further floodplains https://isource.fema.net/emmie/di spate hDestination.do?menuTile=&topTile=dsHeader&bo. . . 4/ 17/2015 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 22 of 22 review is required. - dpostma - 11 /14/2013 15:00:28 GMT All work will take place within previously disturbed ROW. Action meets criteria of FEMA Sec. 106 PA (4/23/13), Appendix B, Section III A and USAGE Sec. 106 PA (9/24/13) Stipulations, Parts II and III . - dpostma - 11 /14/2013 14:39:58 GMT A review of the documentation provided has identified that Weld County is insured for property damages through; Colorado Counties Casualty and Property Pool. Policy Number 020412751 . This policy does not provide coverage for dams, dikes, Insurance JOHNSON 11 -13-2013 bridges, culverts. roadways, streets, walks, paved surfaces, 2 Review KENNETH 11 :32 PM tunnels, canals, land. GMT The insurance policy will not provide coverage for costs identified in this PW There will not an insurance reduction for this PW. The FEMA eligible damages are not to building, contents, equipment, or vehicles; therefore, there will not be an insurance commitment required. GROOVEY 11 -13-2013 1 Initial Review KENNETH 11 : 13 PM Inital review complete. GMT https://isource.fema.net/emmie/dispatchDestination.do?menuTile=&topTile=dsHeader&bo. . . 4/ 17/2015 Hello