The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20151512.tiff RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION FOR VEHICLES (FEMA) AND AUTHORIZE CHAIR TO SIGN WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board has been presented with a Community Development Block Grant for Vehicles (FEMA) from the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, to the Colorado Department of Public Safety, Division of Homeland Security Emergency Management, commencing upon full execution, with further terms and conditions being as stated in said application, and WHEREAS, after review, the Board deems it advisable to approve said application, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the Community Development Block Grant Application for Vehicles (FEMA) from the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, to the Colorado Department of Public Safety, Division of Homeland Security Emergency Management, be, and hereby is, approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the Chair be, and hereby is, authorized to sign said application. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 27th day of May, A.D., 2015. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO ATTEST:C W „"/ � L EXCUSED CC// G_ . ,LLD Barbara Kirkmeyer, Chair Weld County Clerk to the Board mUL I, '' �� Mike Freeman, Pro-Tern BY: a) 11 d ist D 4ty Clerk to the Board 0 'CS 71-- I �Z%`Sean P. Conway .t► APPROVE S TO FOR ,•"4•., .' �`'�� t `. ...- ' ulie A. Cozad County Attorney � -",,, EXCUSED ,®u l e Steve Moreno Date of signature: L0/0 c9 aC' OErn. ,Aet `°la� 2015-1512 EM0016 BC0045 akvak Colorado Division of Homeland Security Grant NOI / Application ("er Emergency Management CDBG - DR Recover Colorado Infrastructure Program THIS SECTION FOR STATE USE ONLY DHSEM Identification Number: Colorado Point of Contact: CDBG-DR Program Manager Date NOI (Part A) Received: Colorado DHSEM 9195 East Mineral Avenue, Suite 200 Date Application (Part B) Received: Centennial, Colorado 80112 Office: 720.852.6713 Date Next Steps Letter Transmitted: Fax: 720.852.6750 cdps dhsem cdbg@state.co.us 2 PART A - NOI : PROJECT OVERVIEW 1 . Applicant Legal Name: Weld County. Colorado 2. Applicant ✓ Local Government Private Non-Profit (Attach copy of 501c3, if applicable) Type: 3. Project Title: County Match FEMA Projects - WELCO09 (860) 4. Proposed Project Total Cost: S39, 119.24 CDBG-DR-I Request: $4,889.28 5. Certifications: The undersigned assures fulfillment of all requirements of the CDBG-DR Recover Colorado Infrastructure Program as contained in the program guidelines and that all information contained herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. The governing body of the applicant has duly authorized the document, commits to the non-Federal and State share identified in the Budget, and hereby applies for the assistance documented in this application. Also, the applicant understands that the project may proceed ONLY AFTER a GRANT AGREEEMENT is approved. Mike Freeman , Pro-Tent Weld County Commissioner (970) 356-4000 Typed Name of Authorized Applicant Agent I/i/r Telephone Number riycst MAY 272015 Signature of Authorized Applicant Agent Date Signed 2015-1512 Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 1 of 20 CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management PART A - NOI: APPLICANT INFORMATION 1 . Applicant Legal Name: Weld County. Colorado 2. FIPS Code: 123 DUNS Number: 07575-7955 3. U.S. Congressional District: 4th Congressman Name: 4. State Senatorial District: 1 Senator Name: M r. Cory Gardner 5. State Legislative District: 50 Representative Name: Mr. Ken Buck 6. Primary Point of Contact: The Primary Point of Contact is the person responsible for coordinating the implementation of this proposal, if approval is granted. Ms. MI 'vir. 12I Mrs. 0 First Name: Roy Last Name: Rudisill Title: Director organization: Weld County Office of Emergency Managemc Street Address: 1 150 O Street City: Greeley State: Colorado Lip Code: 80631 Telephone: (� ( U ) iia Fax: (y f U )iib- / e Mobile: `, (U , 38 - -U E-mail Address: rrudisill(a�co .weld . co 7. Alternate Point of Contact: The Alternate Point of Contact is the person that can address questions or concerns in the Primary Point of Contact's absence. \1 ,. ,/ \lr. MI ,. First Name: Barb I ast Name. Connolly Title: Controller Organization: Weld County Accounting Street Address: 1 150 O Street City: Greeley State: Colorado Zip Code: 80631 Telephone: (y I U )s I ; \ : (y f u )iio- f 4tl Mobile: E-mail Address: bconnolly(�co .weld . 8. Application Prepared b) : Ms. IN \1r. V Mrs First Name: Kyle Last Name: Jones Title: Planner Organization: ARCADIS-US Street Address: City: Tallahassf state: FL Lip Code: 32309 Telephone: (bDU)b Mobile: (225 ) 2U2-3 E-mail Address: kyle . ionesarcadis- 9. Authorized Applicant .agent : Ms. O Mr. \1r ,. IIII First Name: Barbara Last Name: Kirkmeyer Title: COMMiSSii Organization: Weld County Street Address: 1150 O Street, P . O . Box 758 City: Greeley State: Colorado zip Code: 80631 Telephone: (y � ) O� 1 , v Mobile: E-mail Address: bkirkmeyer(a�co .welc The Authorized Applicant Agent MUST be the chief executive officer, mayor, etc. This person must be able to sign contracts, authorize funding allocations or payments, etc. Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 2 of 20 CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management PART A - NOI : PROJECT DESCRIPTION & NATIONAL OBJECTIVES MET 1. Project — Eligible Activity Description: Describe the proposed project. Explain how the proposed project will address recovery and/or resilience needs in your community either independently or as part of a larger project. Include a description of the desired outcome and the recovery objective(s) to be achieved. This narrative should describe the CDBG-DR Eligible Activity. In an effort to achieve resiliency from the severe storms and minimize risk to the general public, Weld County addressed severe damage to local roadways , bridges, culverts, removed hazardous roadway debris, made emergency repairs to paved and gravel roadways , addressed river embankments/dangerous conditions to the public and made repairs to emergency response vehicles that were damaged during the Incident Period . FEMA Categories A. B , C , and E were addressed in the Weld County FEMA Match . CDBG funds are needed to be applied towards the Weld County FEMA Local Match for the emergency work that was identified on previously submitted Project Worksheets . All projects covered under the Weld County Project Worksheets were vital for Weld County to clear hazardous debris from roadways/creeks/streams and enhance their infrastructure, river embankments, equipment and roadways . This particular NOI/Application will discuss IA/CI fl(-Inn foam tsrkir k rh,-lrlrne.r.r,n ftnn+ % .r.- rinmr,rrr,r-1 r4i 'rinn Finn flnnr-1 C 2. Site / Physical Location: Describe the area(s) affected/protected by this project, including location by complete street address and longitude and latitude (coordinates in decimal degrees). The latitude is 40 . 783420 and longitude is - 104 .801590 . The attached spreadsheet shows the Lat/Long coordinates for all of the Project Worksheets and depicts the damage site locations as identified in the correlating Project Worksheets . 3. Population Served: Briefly describe the demographics of the population served or protected by this project. Include the percent of the overall community population benefiting from this project. Explain your response. An estimated 90% or more of the community benefited from the proactive work by Weld County and the removal of hazardous debris and the emergency work/repairs made to the roadways, bridges, equipment and culverts . The population benefiting from this Match Project will include an LMI level population percentage that will be directly or indirectly impacted through this project. This NOI and the associated PW impacted the entire County and demographic area . White : 67 .6% , Hispanic: 28 . 3% , Other: 1 .6% , Asian : 1 . 3% , Black : 0 . 8% , Native American : 0 .4% . Weld County consists of 99, 317 households with a median househo d income of S56 . 589 and the majority of We d County is owner-occupied wi:h O 4. Priority of this Project: If you are submitting more than one CDBG-DR Infrastructure NOI, what is the relative priority of this project? Please indicate the priority as: Priority # of## Projects Submitted. Priority 26 of 36 Projects Submitted . kttach an continuations or additional items as an kttachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 3 of 20 CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management PART A - NOI : CDBG-DR FUNDING QUALIFICATIONS Community Development Block Grant — Disaster Recovery (CDBG-DR) funding can be approved for a project in which ALL of the following requirements are met The physical location of the activity must be within a county listed in Table 1 of the program Recover Colorado Infrastructure Grant Program Guidelines (Guidelines). 1. Connection to Disler Recovery CDBG's Disaster Recovery funds must be used for necessary expenses related to disaster relief, long-term recovery, restoration of infrastructure and housing, economic revitalization, and mitigation from future damages.. The activity must show a direct link to damages received during one or more of the events listed in Table 1 of the Guidelines. Please provide a brief explanation of how the proposed acquisition activity: (1) was a result of the disaster event; (2) will restore infrastructure or revitalize the economy; or will (3) mitigate future damages. During the incident period of September 11 , 2013 to September 30 , 2013 , Weld County, Colorado received heavy rainfall and debris in the creeks , streams and rivers which caused surface gravel removal and scour damage to numerous roads and bridges in Weld County . This NOI Application request addresses 1 emergency work and the damages that were a Y/1f'.. .I ..F h,. !\ /\\ //\ Y/1 Ir\I\IY ✓\ IV t /1 /\/1 YY/\ Il\ V\ /V 1 1, l, l +{1r. 2. Compliance with National Objectives State recipients receiving allocations under the CDBG-DR program must certify that their projected use of funds will ensure, and maintain evidence, that each of its activities assisted with CDBG-DR funds meets at least one of the three National Objectives. a) Which of the National Objectives are met by proposed project? t/ Will benefit low and moderate income (LMI) persons; or Will aid in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight; or ✓ Is an Urgent Need in which meet community development needs having a particular urgency because existing conditions pose a serious and immediate threat to the health or welfare of the community where other financial resources are not available to meet such needs. b) How will the proposed project meet the above checked National Objective(s). See attached LMI data for the Project. In addition to the LMI data attached , the State of Colorado (according to ACS 2008-2012 5Y ) lists Weld County at a 41 .0% LMI . In reviewing the LMI data for this Project NOI , the PW associated LMI % was 37 . 70% . However, this percentage does not accurately capture the total number of service areas that are either directly or indirectly impacted by the FEMA Match Projects. The entire community benefited from the proactive emergency work by Weld County and the removal of hazardous debris and the work/repairs made to the roadways , bridges, equipment and culverts thus the County believes that a higher LMI % should be given for this FEMA match Projects. The general vicinity of FEMA Match Projects encompasses the entire County and greatly benefits the entire LMI population for this project, which is why the County believes that this project not only meets, but exceeds the 50% requirement for meeting the National Objective . The emergency work/repairs that were made under the WELCO PW's for the Local FEMA Match drastically reduced hazardous conditions for the general public and enabled Weld County to focus on resiliency efforts post storm . It is believed that the service area for Project Site Locations benefited multiple LMI tract sections and thus a higher weighted percentage of over 50% should be noted for this p Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 4 of 20 CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 3. Compliance with the primary objective. As indicated in the Guidelines: "A proposed project's benefits to LMI persons will be an important factor in evaluating potential infrastructure projects. A total of 20% of the Recover Colorado Infrastructure project funding must benefit LMI persons. Due to the very low percentage of LMI projects submitted in the first round of infrastructure funding, it is estimated that approximately 25% to 30% of the funding available in this second allocation must meet the LMI requirement to make up for the deficit." This section does not need to be completed if the project does not meet this National Objective. The primary objective for using CDBG Disaster Recovery funds is benefitting, by at least 51 percent, persons of low and moderate income. The following section provides the information necessary to complete this requirement. a) Is the proposed activity: / jurisdiction wide specified target area If you checked specified target area, which data source was used? (Note: select the smallest unit of Census data that encompasses your proposed target area.) b) Enter the number of households involved in the proposed project. 99,317 c) In the space below, describe how the applicant will comply with the requirement that at least 51 percent of CDBG-DR dollars will principally benefit low- and moderate-income households and persons. Weld County will comply with the 51 % requirement due to the fact that the PW associated under this NOI Project for the FEMA County Match is targeted to areas of the county that qualify as LMI . The justification behind this methodology is that multiple d) Enter the number of households within each income category expected to benefit from the proposed project. Incomes above 80% of the County Median 785 Incomes above 50% and up to 80% of the County Median 1265 Incomes at or below 50% of the County Median 2060 e) Which type of income was used to determine the above? (Check only one) As determined by the American Community Survey (Public Facilities projects) IAnnual income as defined for Public Housing and Section 8 Annual income as reported under the Census long form Adjusted gross income as defined for reporting under IRS Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 5 of 24) CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management PART A - NOI : COMPREHENSIVE RISK ANALYSIS INFORMATION 1. Community Hazards Review: Please list and briefly describe in rank order of importance the natural or man-made hazards in your (the Applicant's) service area. The hazards identified within this Project for the FEMA County Match for WELCO09 (860) would be ranked in the following manner: Flood . Erosion and Subsidence . The hazards caused significant damage and posed a severe risk to the community for the designated incident period . 2. High Risk Hazards Addressed by the Project: Describe how, and the degree to which, the proposed project mitigates high risk hazards. Include damage history, source and type of problem, frequency of event(s), and severity of damage information, if available. Hazard 1 Flooding caused the most severe damage to Weld County during the designated incident period and this Project addressed and mitigated against severe flood damage to local roadways, bridges, culverts. removed hazardous debris along roadways . In addition , County Officials ensured repairs were made to paved and gravel roadways for the safety of the community and addressed river embankments/dangerous conditions to the public and made repairs to emergency response vehicles that were damaged during the Incident Period . The repairs made brought the damaged infrastructure back to its pre-disaster condition in accordance with regulations . Hazard 2 Erosion also caused a severe issue for the County . This Project addressed and mitigated against severe erosion damage to local roadways, shoulders, and embankments . The work that was conducted by the County mitigated against any immediate threat/hazard to the damaged infrastructure and restored the infrastructure back to its pre-disaster condition in accordance with regulations . Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 6 of 20 CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management Hazard 3 Subsidence was another critical hazard that caused dangerous conditions for the community. This Project addressed and mitigated against severe subsidence damage to local roadways, shoulders, bridges and embankments . The work that was conducted by the County mitigated against any immediate threat/hazard to the damaged infrastructure and restored the infrastructure back to its pre-disaster condition in accordance with regulations . Note: If your proposed project addresses more than three Hazards, please provide that information as an attachment. 3. Elimination of Risk: Does the proposed project result in the elimination of a hazard from your (the Applicant's) service area? If so, please describe. If not, please estimate the degree to which this project will mitigate the risk from the hazards identified in Item #2. The Proposed FEMA Local Match for WELCO09 (860 ) does not completely eliminate the hazards identified from the service area . The Proposed FEMA Match Project does allow Weld County to receive a percentage of funds back that the County expended during one of the most costly disasters in Colorado history however. These types of hazards that occurred in Weld County and throughout Colorado are truly an act of mother nature and the County was as prepared as it could have been but the severity/duration of the incident was of an unprecedented nature . Weld County cannot eliminate the risk of future flooding , erosion or land subsidence , but Local Officials can ensure that their community is prepared for future incident, take the necessary precautions and that their infrastructure is restored 4. Environmental Quality Improvements: Does the proposed project result in an improvement in the quality of the natural environment in your (the Applicant's) service area? If so, please describe. Yes: the damages that attributed to the designated incident period and FEMA-DR 4145 were addressed via the previously submitted PW and the work conducted to restore the infrastructure back to its pre-disaster condition was implemented . The work done at this site location (see previous attachment for lat/long coordinates ) addressed not only improvements/repairs made to the infrastructure, but also improvements and repairs to the river embankments and any potential erosion or subsidence issues that could have 1A/nrennnri if thn ( 'nt inft, heard not trilrnn fin nrn'nr +ivin rrnnr ci irnc tint finny/ rfirl a 5. Climate Change Improvements: Does the proposed project reduce or ameliorate a projected impact of climate change in Colorado? If so, please briefly describe the benefit of the project. This Proposed Project reduces a projected impact climate change due to the proactive mitigation measures that were undertaken by Weld County during the designated incident period . This was accomplished by ensuring that the damaged site location was addressed as soon , but as safely. as possible, and not to sustain any further impacts to the site locations or environment that would enable the damage to enhance the projected impact of any potential climate changes . Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 7 of 211 CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 6. Community Process: Does the proposed project include a community planning or involvement process that increases community resiliency? If so, please briefly describe the process. This Proposed Project was initiated by County Officials in an effort to achieve resiliency from the severe storms and also to minimize risk to the community, Weld County addressed the severe flood damage to the roadways and infrastructure by ensuring that dangerous conditions for the public were addressed and mitigated properly and efficiently. 7. Reduction in the Costs of Future Response or Recovery: Will the proposed project result in a reduction in the cost of response or recovery from an incident occurring due to one or more of the hazards identified in Item #1 or #2? If so, please briefly describe how response or recovery costs will be reduced. For a small scale flooding incident, yes; however, the flooding that occurred during the designated incident period was catastrophic and the PW associated with the NOI FEMA Local Match Request were completed to address the damages . y y 8. Floodplain/Floodway/Substantially Damaged Properties: Does the proposed project include a property or properties located in a floodway or floodplain; or not located in a regulatory floodplain but which were substantially damaged or have a history of damage from at least two disaster events? If so, please identify those properties below. No ; the Proposed Project is for the FEMA Local Match for WELCO09 (860 ) from CDBG-DR in regards to expenses from CAT C Damage Categories for the designated incident period for FEMA-DR 4145 . 9. Mitigation Planning: Does your community have a current FEMA approved multi-hazard mitigation plan? ✓ Yes \u Location of proposed project in mitigation plan strategies: Page 139 Section/Part Mitigation Stra Is the community a member of good standing with the National Flood Insurance Program? I J 1 \o Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 8 of 20 CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 10. Community Plan Compliance: Does the proposed project comply with and/or address an issue recognized in key community plans? Key plans include, but are not limited to: a Comprehensive Master Plan, a Stormwater Management Plan, a Hazard Mitigation Plans, or key community codes. If so, please describe how the project integrates into the plan(s). Yes; the Proposed Project complies with all local community plans and this Project integrates into the Plans because the County addressed the damages to local roadways and infrastructure and mitigated damages that posed a serious risk/hazard to the community during the incident period . This FEMA PW was initiated by Weld County and via this Proposed Project. the County requests that CDBG funds be applied towards the local FEMA Match for this Project . 11. Environmental / Historic Preservation Issues: Please describe any significant environmental, historic, or cultural features that may be affected by the project. Please also describe any features that may be improved by the project. This Project is for the replacement of County vehicles that were damaged in the flood and , therefore, does not have any environmental or historical preservation issues . 12. Permitting: Please list the local, state, and federal permits that will be required to complete this project . This Project is for the replacement of County vehicles that were damaged in the flood and , therefore, does not require any environmental permitting . Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 9 of 20 CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 13. Community Resilience: Please describe how this project will increase the resilience of your community. As defined in the Guidelines: "Resilience incorporates hazard mitigation and land use planning strategies; critical infrastructure, environmental and cultural resource protection; and sustainability practices to reconstruct the built environment, and revitalize the economic, social, and natural environments." In an effort to achieve resiliency from the severe storms and minimize risk to the general public, Weld County addressed severe damage to local roadways, bridges, culverts, removed hazardous debris roadways, made repairs to paved and gravel roadways , addressed river embankments/dangerous conditions to the public and made repairs to emergency response vehicles that were damaged during the Incident Period . This Proposed Project addresses proactive work initiated by Weld County during FEMA-DR 4145 enabled the community to recover in an expeditious manner and increased the resilience of the community by incorporating nearly every aspect of sustainability and revitalizing the community. The community was able to recover quicker due to the proactive work done through this Proposed Project and the associated PW's . 14. Maps Please attach the following maps with the project site and structures marked on the map. Use SAME ID number as in the Individual Property Worksheets. IFlood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM). If the FIRM for your area is not published, please attach a copy of the Flood Hazard Boundary Map (FHBM). City or county scale map (large enough to show the entire project area) USGS 1 :24,000 topo map Parcel Map (Tax Map, Property Identification Map, etc.) Overview photographs. The photographs should be representative of the project area, including any relevant streams, creeks, rivers, etc., and drainage areas which affect the project site of will be affected by the project. 15. Additional Comments (Optional): Enter any additional comments related to the proposed project's ability to reduce hazard risk and increase community resiliency. This proposed project reduced the hazard risk to the community and increased resiliency by the work conducted through the PW in correlation with FEMA-DR 4145 . CDBG funds are being requested to be applied to the local FEMA Match ( 12 . 5% ) for the PW. All maps are located in project files that were previously submitted and will be provided upon request. The entire r.nmmi Jolty henefited from the nrnactive work by Weld Count/ and the removal nt' Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and c mail submittal. Page 10 of 20 ( 'l)13G-1)R Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management PART A - NOI: DECISION MAKING PROCESS 1. Decision-Making Process: Describe the process you used to decide that this project is the best solution to the problem. Explain why this project is the best alternative you considered. Address questions such as: • Are you focusing on the area in your community that has the greatest potential for losses? • Have you considered the risks to critical facilities and structures and benefits to be obtained by mitigating this vulnerability? • Have you considered those areas or projects that present the greatest opportunities given the current situation(s) of interest in your community? • Are you addressing a symptom or the source of the problem? Addressing the source of the problem is a long-term solution which provides the most mitigation benefits. • If impacts to the environment, natural, cultural or historic resources have been identified, explain how your alternatives and proposed project address, minimize, or avoid these impacts. The Site locations within this WELCO PW in the Proposed Project were identified due to the high dollar amount of funds that were expended by Weld County to ensure the safety of the community and also restore county infrastructure back to its pre-disaster condition . This Proposed Project has site locations across the entire community and service area and it was determined that a large percentage of the LMI population was impacted by the severe flooding incident and the proactive work by County Officials enabled the community to recover quicker, thus allowing the community to sustain resiliency and return operations to normal . 2. Acquisition Projects - Describe the community's methodology for selecting the properties to be acquired in this application and how each is ranked (highest to lowest): N/A Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and c-mail submittal. Page 11 of 20 CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management PART A - NOI: SCOPE OF WORK / BUDGET OVERVIEW / FINANICAL FACTORS 1. Project Scope: Please provide a comprehensive and detailed description of the scope of the proposed project. Describe each of the project components and the steps necessary to complete that work. If the proposed project is a funding match for another disaster recovery or infrastructure development program, please identify the agency, program funds, and project reference number that CDBG-DR funding is intended to support. Also describe any critical deadlines that must be met to accomplish this work. This Proposed Project is for the Local FEMA Match for costs for WELCO09 (860 ). These costs were incurred as a result of FEMA-DR 4145 . During the incident period of September 11 , 2013 to September 30 , 2013 , Weld County, Colorado received heavy rainfall and debris in the creeks, streams and rivers which caused severe flooding to and along roadways and surface streets , and also severely damaged local infrastructure . This NOI Application request addresses the emergency work / damages that were a direct result of the severe flooding . A Scope of Work is included within the PW and addresses the work that was completed . 2. Community Priority: Please describe why this project is a priority for your organization. This Proposed Project is a priority for Weld County to utilize the CDBG funding as the Local FEMA Match to offset the costs for the proactive work done by the County to reduce hazardous conditions to the community. Attach any continuations or additional item as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 12 of 20 4 CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 3. Project Cost Summary: Please summarize the major cost components of the project. Please round all values to the nearest dollar. a. Planning / Engineering / Design $ b. Environmental Compliance $ The value of general and/or c. Real Property Acquisition / Demolition $ professional labor wages must be tabulated in accordance d. Closing Costs / Legal Fees $ with the Davis Bacon Act of e. Housing Program Assistance $ 1931 f. Construction Costs $ g. Project Delivery Costs $ h. Other (specify below) $ 39. 119.24 See Protect Worksheet Cost ',attached) i. Total ofa-h $ 39, 119.24 j. Duplication of Benefits (if unknown at time of application enter zero). $ 0 00 k. Subtract j. from i. to determine Total Project Cost $ 39, 119.24 Notes: Housing Program Assistance costs include the cost of compliance with Uniform Relocation Assistance (URA) and Comparable Housing Assistance (CHA) requirements. Project Delivery Costs include the costs of project delivery by the sponsoring organization but do not include administrative overhead. 4. Total Project Cost Allocations Proposed Project Total Cost: $ 39. 119.24 Federal Cost Share: $ 29,339.43 State Cost Share: $ 4.889.91 $ 4.889.90 Local Cost Share 5. Basis of Cost Estimate: Briefly describe how the cost estimates listed in #3 above were developed (e.g. lump sum, unit cost, quotation, etc.). The Cost Estimates were developed above from actual work that was properly procured and conducted . They come directly off of what was included on the FEMA approved PW and the costs are broken down by type of work and site . 6. Project Management: Describe how you will manage the costs and schedule, and how you will ensure successful performance. The work for this Proposed Project has been completed or is pending completion . The 12 . 5% CDBG Local Match will be applied towards the Weld County Match for FEMA PW's and the costs that were previously incurred during the disaster. Note: The applicant must agree to furnish quarterly reports during the entire time the project is in active status. Quarters end on March 31st, June 30th, September 30th, and December 31st. Reports are due to the State within 15 days after the end of each quarter.) Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 13 of 20 0 CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 7. Project Maintenance Requirements: The following questions are to give assurance on the project's maintenance over its useful life. Please answer each question and give a brief explanation. a. If the project involves the acquisition of real property, what is the proposed land use after acquisition? (i.e., Agriculture, Recreation, Vacant Land, Park, Wetlands, etc.) N/A b. Will the project require periodic maintenance? No c. If yes, who will provide the maintenance? N/A d. What is the estimated cost of maintenance on an annual basis? 0 Note: Cost of maintenance is considered an application prioritization weighting factor. Projects with high maintenance costs have a greater risk of future failure due to deferred maintenance. Therefore, the responses provided above should be as complete and verifiable as possible in order to minimize the likelihood of ranking point reductions due to maintenance concerns. 8. Additional Comments: Enter any additional comments related to the proposed project's funding, if desired . CDBG funds are needed for the 12 . 5% Local FEMA Match and the associated PW that is included in the NOI-Application . It should be noted that a version request was submitted for this project for work that has yet to be completed . The total obligated amount could change which would change the 12 .5% Local FEMA Match . 9. Financial / Fiscal Health Factors: Please indicate the total budget (all funds) of your organization. Please describe the impact of disaster recovery efforts to date on this budget. In addition, if this objective is selected based on the local governments inability to finance the activity, the municipality must also include in the application package a resolution stating this fact and supporting documentation such as budgetary information, a description of TABOR restrictions, and the most recent audit report or approved exemption from audit. Weld County's total 2015 budget is $307 ,031 , 089 . 00 . The impact of the September, 2013 flooding has primary been on the damage to the county's road and bridge system . The damage has resulted in Weld County having to transfer $5 million from the Contingency Fund to the Public Works Fund in 2013 and in 2014 for a total of $ 10 million dollars . Without assistance from FEMA, FWHA, and CDBG the amount would have several million more . The impact has also forced the county to shift local resources from projects unrelated to flooding to deal with the emergency situations created by the flood in both the 2013 and 2014 fiscal years . Even in 2015 the county is still using local resources to recover from the flooding . Fortunately, Weld County has always been fiscally conservative and budgeted responsibly. Had the county not taken the responsible approach to its finances county service would have had to have been cut to cope with the flood recovery. 1A/olrl ( 'r inty nnorotcsc i inner tho mnct rocfrirti .p nrnncr+ + I ' it fi t a a Ro irlocN Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 14 of 20 CDB(;-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management PART B - APPLICATION : PROJECT MILESTONES / TIMELINES / TASKS I . Timeline / Tasks Insert the proposed work schedule as tasks to accomplish the overall goal of the proposed activity (i.e., appraisals, title search, closing, etc.), and provide a description of the task's purpose. This timeline will be used as a measurement tool for progress in the project's implementation and is included in the required Quarterly Reports. Also, FEMA uses the timeline for determining the approved period of performance. It will be the basis used to justify delays or extensions, if necessary, and should be estimated carefully. The first and last entries are state requirements and have already been entered. Task 1 : Grant Process and Environmental Review Timeframe: 1 Month Task 2: County Vehicles were flooded during the flood . Completed Timeframe: Task 3: Replacement Vehicles were selected and purchased. Completed Timeframe: Task 4: Timeframe: Task 5: Timeframe: Task 6: Timeframe: Task 7: Timeframe: Task 8: Timeframe: Task 9: Timeframe: Final Inspection Report and Project Closeout Task 10: The Final Inspection Report is a review of the activity's paper documentation. showing the project was implemented as required. Once the review is completed. the 3 Months report and findings will be provided to the grantee for review and concurrence. The Timeframe: State submits the concurrence to FEMA as part of a closeout package to formally "Total Project Timeframe: 4 Months Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 15 4)r 211 S CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 2. Start Date & Pre-Award Costs: The start date for any project begins upon GRANT AGREEMENT approval by the State Controller. If a different start date or timeframe is needed, provide an explanation below. Also indicate if any pre- award activities or costs have been incurred or authorized. The proposed project is for local FEMA match dollars on the replacement of County vehicles that were damaged during the flood . The replacement vehicles have already been selected and purchased . Additionally, cost have been incurred through the preparation of this NOI Application . Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and c-mail submittal. Page 16 of 20 I CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management Please note that Part B is required for the final Application submittal. Part B sections may optionally be completed and submitted with the NOI. Please update any Part A section information when submitting you full Application. PART B — APPLICATION : ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW 1. Environmental Review Background Information & Environmental Review Worksheet: In accordance with 24 CFR Part 58.22 (see below), all federally funded projects must accomplish an environmental review prior to beginning any work on a project. These HUD regulations are in place for two purposes: 1 . To ensure federal funds are used to place people of low and moderate income in environmentally safe conditions; and 2. To ensure federal funds are NOT used to negatively impact environmental conditions that exist near a project site. Please note the following limitations on CDBG-DR grant activities pending environmental clearance per 24 CFR Part 58.22. (a) Neither a recipient nor any participant in the development process, including public or private nonprofit or for-profit entities, or any of their contractors, may commit HUD assistance under a program listed in Sec. 58. 1(b) on an activity or project until HUD or the state has approved the recipient's RROF and the related certification from the responsible entity. In addition, until the RROF and the related certification have been approved, neither a recipient nor any participant in the development process may commit non-HUD funds on or undertake an activity or project under a program listed in Sec. 58. 1(b) if the activity or project would have an adverse environmental impact or limit the choice of reasonable alternatives. (b) N/A for DOLA/CDPS projects. (c) If a recipient is considering an application from a prospective sub-recipient or beneficiary and is aware that the prospective sub-recipient or beneficiary is about to take an action within the jurisdiction of the recipient that is prohibited by paragraph (a) of this section, then the recipient will take appropriate action to ensure that the objectives and procedures of NEPA are achieved. (d) An option agreement on a proposed site or property is allowable prior to the completion of the environmental review if the option agreement is subject to a determination by the recipient on the desirability of the property for the project as a result of the completion of the environmental review in accordance with this part and the cost of the option is a nominal portion of the purchase price. There is no constraint on the purchase of an option by third parties that have not been selected for HUD funding, have no responsibility for the environmental review and have no say in the approval or disapproval of the project. (e) Self-Help Homeownership Opportunity Program (SHOP). In accordance with section 11(d)(2)(A) of the Housing Opportunity Program Extension Act of 1996 (42 U.S.C. 12805 note), an organization, consortium, or affiliate receiving assistance under the SHOP program may advance non-grant funds to acquire land prior to completion of an environmental review and approval of a Request for Release of Funds (RROF) and certification, notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this section. Any advances to acquire land prior to approval of the RROF and certification are made at the risk of the organization, consortium, or affiliate and reimbursement for such advances may depend on the result of the environmental review. This authorization is limited to the SHOP program only and all other forms of HUD assistance are subject to the limitations in paragraph (a) of this section. (f) Relocation. Funds may be committed for relocation assistance before the approval of the RROF and related certification for the project provided that the relocation assistance is required by 24 CFR part 42. Attach any continuations or additional item as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 17 of 20 CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management Environmental Review Worksheet Check ALL of the activities listed below that will be included as part of the project, REGARDLESS OF THE FUNDING SOURCE: ❑ Information and financial services Administrative and management activities • Environmental and other studies, resource identification, and the development of plans and strategies ■ Most engineering and design costs associated with eligible projects • Inspections and testing of properties for hazards or defects ❑ Project planning Q 3 ❑ Purchase of insurance > ❑ Purchase of tools ❑ Technical assistance and training X :c .5. O Interim assistance to arrest the effects of an imminent threat or physical deterioration in which the assistance Liu p does not alter environmental conditions. Public services that will not have a physical impact or result in any physical changes e n P Y � P P Y • g ( .g., employment, child .ti) care, health, education, counseling, welfare) ❑ Assistance for temporary or permanent improvements that do not alter environmental conditions and are limited to protection, repair, or restoration activities necessary only to control or arrest the effects from disasters or imminent threats to public safety including those resulting from physical deterioration (Must also complete the Regulatory Checklist at the end of Exhibit IV-A) > ig Operating costs e. , maintenance, security, o eration utilities, furnishings, equipment, su lies staff training P g ( g• p g , supplies,� Z = and recruitment, other incidental costs) Vn Relocation costs LU ❑ Acquisition, repair, improvement, reconstruction, or rehabilitation when the facilities and improvements are in place and will be retained in the same use without change in size or capacity of more than 20 percent ❑ Special projects directed to the removal of material and architectural bathers that restrict the mobility of and aim r accessibility to elderly and handicapped persons Acquisition (including leasing) or disposition of, or equity loans on, an existing structure ❑ Acquisition (including leasing) of vacant land provided the structure or land acquired, financed, or disposed of will be retained for the same use Q Acquisition, repair, improvement, reconstruction, or rehabilitation when the facilities and improvements are in c 4 place, but will change in size or capacity of more than 20 percent > ❑ Acquisition, repair, improvement, reconstruction, or rehabilitation when the facilities and improvements are in :44 4 place, but will involve a change in land use, such as from non-residential to residential, commercial to industrial, or from one industrial use to another Demolition glIS ❑ New construction This checklist must be included with the CDBG application. Please direct questions to the appropriate contact person below: DOLA/DLG DHSEM 1 amra Norton, Environmental Compliance Officer Steven Boand, State Disaster Recovery Manager Department of Local Affairs Department of Public Safety 1313 Sherman Street, Room 521, Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management Denver, CO 80203 9195 E Mineral Ave, Suite 200 303-866-6398 Centennial, CO 80112 720.852.6713 tamra.norton@state.co.us steven.boand@state.co.us DPS/DOLA USE ONLY: Required level of environmental review: O Exempt O CENST O CESTO EA Reviewed by: Date of Review: Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 18 of 20 ('DR(:-OR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 2. Supplemental Environmental Review Information Enter any additional comments related to environmental concerns for the proposed project if desired. Please list and attach any documents or studies that have been prepared that support the Environmental Review Worksheet responses. This Project is for the replacement of County vehicles that were damaged in the flood and , therefore, does not have any environmental or historical preservation issues . Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 19 of 20 CDBC-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management PART B - APPLICATION : DETAILED PROJECT BUDGET 1. Detailed Project Budget: Please enter or attach a detailed and comprehensive final proposed budget for the project. Please note that CDBG-DR funds may be limited to the amount submitted with the NOI pending the availability of additional funding This Proposed Project is for the Local FEMA Match for costs for WELCO16 (661 ) . These costs were incurred as a result of FEMA-DR 4145 . During the incident period of September 11 , 2013 to September 30 , 2013. Weld County, Colorado received heavy rainfall and debris in the creeks, streams and rivers which caused severe flooding to and along roadways and surface streets , and also severely damaged local infrastructure . This Application request addresses the emergency work / damages that were a direct result of the severe flooding . A Scope of Work and detailed project budget is included within the PW and addresses the work that was completed . Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 20 of 20 N IQ C) N O v Q U C_ E 3 01 E C 01 I- 0) C N C 0 O O E N o. ar 3 c O' O o o E a `-0 E v E a E a 2 a v m 2 C E o m J m y E -0 0 co C 0 O 0 •' iv c » 2 l0 r0 ? O ru ,; 47-4 OCI E CI o m o > C -0 a o O U 0 . J 0 C C E 0 3 3 3 o 0 0 0 o ti Leo — 3 m w o to O O O C C c C C C 9 Ea) J a 3 i_ O a O O 01 N V U U U c- -o 0- - 0o z O O O y O O O x 2 — 2 2 002 2 0 0 J J J J J o e o 0 0R 0 0e o e o 0 0 o e e e o e o 0 3e e e de o o e e o`e e e ae e oR o o e e e e O r+ tD ID 1.0 1/40 LC 0 n n o o O ID LO ID tT LO O el O Cr Cr LO n tD n et Cr Cr CO Cr W n n n 0 al O uO N N el .-1 el e-. 17 N N n n Cr el el el re n N IN In Ill I'-1 re re N CO N l/1 .-� V1 ri !j O r-I Q V1 C N O. Cl CO CO CO Co CO 00 01 N N IN N. 01 CO CO U) 0 CO CO Co N N N CO 0 in N (Ti N N In n In in ul 00 al CO 01 N CO n M en 0l M M CO M In m m CO m M M m M Cr n M M M N Jl N N N N N d 00 M CO Vl O CO 3 O ✓1 In ✓) In VI in ✓I Ln O O In V1 V1 In vl v1 O in 0 in in rn ul ul O O O O In VI O Ill O O O M L l Vl Irl O in Ol .--I re .-I re ri ✓1 CO 00 N. N in .-I .--1 .--I in el N 01 N. L/1 V1 re 01 tD CO re in in IO in it tD O n in O In CO co M m m en en n 01 Ol r-1 .-I N M M Cn M m n co rl O o m n n 01 V O O N ON O ON n N n 01 M M en m m r-I .-I N N m m M N m N N N (Ti .-I NJ .--1 N N N N N .-e .-I .--I Z O O O J J1 In 0 0 0 0 0 ✓1 to to o 0 ✓1 O O O o 0 In In 0 0 0 0 In O In 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ✓1 ✓1 to ✓1 In m ID t0 to to tD tD m O O in O m tD tD ID O t.0 ID LO O Ill In 1D o M O U ✓1 ✓l m ✓1 V m o m0 n 0 0 0 0 0 n 4 Q i Q n 0 0 0 eel 0 V n V 4.0 4.0 O .-I O a N ID LID O tD O Cr Q o n CO n N N N N N ,.-I .--� --i N N N .--i N .-1 N .-I re .-I GJ Lc, O ul tfl In vl In In ul In O O ul In N In O to ✓1 0 0 Vl Vl ul 0 ✓l in O vl ✓1 ul ul m O 0 ✓1 ✓1 ✓l to V1 n O to LCD ID tD ID n M M N N n to ID tD CO LO n O N In Ill 1D V m en 0 in In 01 to 01 n n in n to n M to n N N N N N ID O O CO CO tD N N N N N M N CO .--1 r-1 N ✓1 ID O .--I .-y .-I ID .--1 tD N N 0) ID '7 ID O re el re el ol rl re O J ✓t to ✓1 In In In ✓t LT) o 0 ✓l ✓t tfi vl ✓l In n al o ✓, ✓1 ✓, ✓1 ✓t o to o 0 ✓t In ✓l ✓, 0 o N ell o In o to re Co CO 00 00 m n n n N to in to to In InN- M CO CO CO 01 00 COoO r� ✓1 n CO LO CO n n CO n CO CO Ol D1 ✓t O ✓1 In O In n n In tD to AD ID ✓1 n n n rr n m tD n m N tD ry N N In N In lD J re N .-I .-i .-I r-, .-I .-I r-. .-+ N N ..4 I--, .--I ri !V .ti r-I N N .-e re rl M r4 .-I .-I .-I el N r-I N .-I re re '-I re .-I .-I O L/1 el el .. .-1 .ti (0 0 0 re .-I O re - re N re ✓) in re 0 O re N rn 0 tD 0 0 to O rrl CO CO 0 0 01 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r-1 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .-I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rl O I-+ ID n ✓l Ln to In to to o o ✓1 ✓1 ID an ✓1 ✓1 to in N n IJl 00 CO M H I-1 o O CO 00 ri OO re M 01 tD tD 0 LO o O 0 N N N N N 0 N N N N O rV N N N N 0 0 N r-1 rl N N N N N ri r-1 N rti N .--I .--1 r-I O N 0 N 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O coo a o 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m M M M m M M M M m en m m m M (Yi m M m m M m M m m M M M M m m m M M m m m m M M O .-i .N-I el el el ri r - ri ri ri el ri ri .N-i .N-I .Ni el ri el r ri ri el el ri r± el r+ re re rl rI eel .N-I ri ri ri re ri Y CO 00 m 00 00 00 00 CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO 03 CO CO 00 CO CO CO m CO00 00 CO CO CO 00 CO CO 00 CO CO CO CO CO 00 CO L., 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 In 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N V1 V7 In in VI in in Vf ✓1 ✓1 V1 V1 1/1 V1 ✓1 Vl V) to N in VI In N V1 in N V1 VI to N V1 Vl In in N in N In N O 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O 0 O O 0 O O O 0 0 0 O O O O 0 O O 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000 to 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 0 N 0 0 00000000000000000000 000000000000000000 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W in in In In In In v1 in Jl M in ✓1 ✓1 to ✓1 in to in in Vl ✓1 J1 in ✓l In to ✓1 In ✓1 In m ✓l ✓1 ✓t Jl to to to to in LI r1 r-I r4 .N re re .-I r1 .--1 re t"1 rI .-I re re re re rl el c-I .'-I rI re ."I .'1 el .-I N el .-I re rl r♦ re el ."1 re I--I r1 r1 r. .-. rI N m v in .-I r+ .-I .-I rI -ti .y N m .-I ry re N .r .. IN rl ri N en v re N m v • 4 .-1 rl --I • f .r .-. .-I C O N U O J .-I en O '7 O cT Q In tD N. CO Cl) 0 .-I re r1 .N N to In tD co 00 tT .- .-I .-1 .-1 rn en m m Q .-I en Q in LO IN 03 -1 I--. r-1 '+ re r4 NJ NJ N N N N N N N en m m en m m m a c a < < 44 < 4 < 44 < 4 < < < < < < < < < 4 < < < < a a < < < < 0) 222222222 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 22 2 22 22 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 00 tL W U. IL IJ.1 W W W W W IJ.1 W 11J U- IL W W W IJ.I W W W LL1 W W U. U W UJ W W W W W IL W u W I. W cr LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL U. U- LL LL U- U- U- LL U- LL LL LL LL LL CO O O O 0 O o 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O N O o CO C co to I--I N V Q in m CO tD V C In ✓1 NN N in tD m O C O Co Ol 01 r-I el VI M LI1 el 01 U3 ere LO N ul Ol M O C) 01 N Q Vl CO ri O N N In ri IN Ol Vl N n ✓l N r-1 lD 0 t--1 0 M N 01 Ol t10 n 00 03 en in ID N CO M N Ol 0 O M M N n lb M 0 tD n l0 00 N Cre V CO 0 M in V c O el . o 0 U . m M CO CO - CO CO Cr Cr O el CO eel m o N N 0 0 to In In ✓1 N Ol 0 o Crcr n to al 0 3 V V M en en en M � r-I .--I n n � M en en en m4 � n N N m m N el p NJ N N N N 0 0 '7 V .-I Cr O 0000000000000000 C3000000000000000 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 00000000 i G Q V V V V V C! V V O V 4 -r a V Q Cr Cr Cr Cr Cr Ct Q eT Cr V Cr r! Cr Cr .7 Cr Cr Cr V rf C o cl -J Cr O O 0 0 0 0 0 O 000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000000000000 .040 c0000 O in 0 O 0) to CO m 0) 01 N n to N m tD C0 01 01 n ON ri O in N en V1 in N V V en C) N O CA ✓1 CO CO 03 01 CT n V r} V ✓1 ✓1 D1 co co CO O co 00 N N o o CO N 01 01 03 N ✓1 m N n 00 el tD 0l O CO N y n O Cr Cr R O '7 .--1 O 0 el el el CO CO CO M M M O el CO el Cr CFI N 1D V 01 01 O OO tD CO tO m 01 M O Cr V Ci Cr 0 0 N 0 O 0 CO CO 00 _ I-4 _ N O 01 O V Co r1 m p n N 00 N m V CO tD O N 01 ✓1 tD l0 N N N N N IN O O CO CO N V Q Cr Cr cr tD ID CO 00 03 N CO O O 01 CO tb OO CO O CO CO In n 01 ID O '_' O 4 V 4 V V a 0 to to O V Cf 0 V V V V 4 V O V 0 a Q ✓i in.C V V C Q O ✓i V V O O V V ✓t m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 o 0 o 0 0 0 0 o 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C ri r♦ r+ r-1 r-1 re re el el r-1 r. r. .-1 el r-1 .--I el el .-1 el el el el el el r/ el et re r. el r� .--1 el el r l r/ el r. rl O , , , , . , , . . , , , , . , . . , , . , , , , . , . , J r r i' •;is 4.a . 4 �� 4- . 4,4 il e . . . t + egg • I i a k a =L LL W U. • LL LL 4. ' 1i. IIII , •; .,f. I--4`.crr ii • fir to. i b.t I 6 ,• ji11 '3tob tal. 1A . if . 40 ' i !' � • • �i . . . . A. .SO:U. .4-ttit .LINmi 4.13 IDI 4- _ • jp.4 it IIIPPIr tMlEr , 0 Tir N _ t. 11 i , + 1(ta. el O r d a. Ili O u. -O = w Ic 1 p C IL Il • �.� ; , 0 y Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page I of 12 hP,- . -0aG . i45-I N- 0860(0) P App icant Name: Application Title: WELD (COUNTY) WELCO09 - VEHICLES Period of Performance Start: Period of Performance End: 09-14-2013 03-14-2015 Subgrant Application - Entire Application Application Title: VVELCO09 - VEHICLES Application Number: PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00860(0) Application Type: Subgrant Application (PW) Preparer Information Prefix Mr. First Name STEPHEN Middle Initial Last Name SUHY Title Project Specialist Agency/Organization Name FEMA-DHS Address 1 9200 E. Mineral Ave. Address 2 City Centennial State CO Zip 80112 Email deanna. butterbaugh@state.co. us I Is the application preparer the Point of Contact? No Point of Contact Information Prefix Mr. First Name Roy Middle Initial Last Name Radisill Title Director - OEM Agency/Organization Weld County Address 1 1150 O Street Address 2 City Greeley State CO ZIP 80632 https://connect I .dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatch Destination.do?. . . 5/6/2014 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 2 of 12 Phone 970-304-6540 Fax Email rrudisill@weldgov.com Alternate Point of Contact Information Prefix Mr. First Name Trevor Middle Initial Last Name Jinicek Title Director Agency/Organization Weld County Address 1 1150 O Street Address 2 City Greeley State CO ZIP 80632 Phone 970-356-4000 Fax Email tjinicek@weldgov.com Project Description Disaster Number: 4145 Pre-Application Number: PA-08-CO-4145-RPA-0088 Applicant ID: 123-99123-00 Applicant Name: WELD (COUNTY) Subdivision: Project Number: WELCO09 Standard Project Number/Title: 503 - Building Contents/Equipment Please Indicate the Project Type: Neither Alternate nor Improved Application Title: WELCO09 - VEHICLES Category: E.PUBLIC BUILDINGS Percentage Work Completed? 100.0 As of Date: 02-05-2014 Comments Attachments Damage Facilities (Part 1 of 2) Facility Site Number Facility Name Address County City State ZIP Previously Action Damaged? 1 VEHICLES 1150 O Street Weld Greeley CO 80632 No https://connect 1 .dhs.gov/emmie/, Danalnfo=isource. tema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do`.'. .. 5 6:'2014 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 3 of 12 Comments Attachments User Date Document Description Hard Copy File File Name Action Type Reference 02- ACCIDENT 4145-WELCO09-WELD 2011 & 2008 FORD STEPHEN 20- Additional REPORT 2011 & COUNTY-ACCIDENT ACCIDENT View SUHY 2014 Information 2008 REPORT 2011 & 2008 REPORT .pdf(87. 39 kb) 02- 4145-WELCO09-WELD ACCIDENT STEPHEN 20- Additional ACCIDENT COUNTY-ACCIDENT REPORT.pdf( 152.69 `�i_e!,, SUHY 2014 Information REPORT REPORT kb) 02- 4145-WELCO09-WELD STEPHEN 20- Additional AUCTION COUNTY-AUCTION Auction Report.pdf View SUHY 2014 Information REPORT REPORT (249.67 kb) STEPHEN 02- 4145-WELCO09-WELD SUHY 20- Map MAP VEH 2011 COUNTY-MAP VEH MAP VEH 2O11 .pdf View 2014 2011 ( 121 . 37 kb) STEPHEN 02- 4145-WELCO09-WELD MAP VEH 2007 SUHY 20- Map MAP VEH 2007 COUNTY-MAP VEH VAN. pdf( 145. 36 kb) View 2014 2007 STEPHEN 02- 4145-WELCO09-WELD MAP VEH 2008 SUHY 20- Map MAP VEH 2008 COUNTY-MAP VEH FORD.pdf(126. 55 kb) �' 2014 2008 ATTCH 1 STEPHEN 025- Receipt PURCHASE 4145-WELCO09-WELD ATTACH 1 .pdf( 198.47 , SUHY 2014 ORDER COUNTY-ATTCH 1 kb) i ‘./v .,P,, 03- STEPHEN o5- Letter ATTCH 4 4145-WELCO09-WELD ATTCH 4.pdf(146. 13 View SUHY 2014 COUNTY-ATTCH 4 kb) 04- 4145-WELCO09-WELD STEPHEN Final Claim Insurance Claim . pdf 03- Insurance claim COUNTY-INSURANCE SUHY 2014 Document CLAIM (240. 91 kb) STEPHEN04- 03- Invoice ATTACH 2 4245-WELCO09-WELD ATTACH 2.pdf(25.65 , ,.` SUHY 2014 COUNTY-ATTACH 2 kb) STEPHEN 04- DAMAGE 4145-WELCO09-WELD DAMAGE SUHY 03- Invoice INVOICE COUNTY-DAMAGE INVOICE. pdf(55.49 '1/4/ ley.' 2014 INVOICE kb) Facility Name: VEHICLES Address 1 : 1150 O Street Address 2: County: Weld City: Greeley State: CO ZIP: 80632 Was this site previously damaged? No https://connect I .dhs.gov/emmie/,DanaInfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 5/6/2014 I Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 4 of 12 Percentage Work Completed? 100. 00 % PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00860(0): 2008 Ford located on WCR21 approaching WCR14. 2007 Mini Van located at Birch Street and Firestone Blvd. Del Camini. CO. and 2011 Location : Ford located at intersectin of CR 18 and CR 23. PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00860(0): During the incident period of September 11 . 2013 to September 30. 2013, Weld County. Colorado received heavy rainfall and debris in the creeks, streams and rivers which caused flooding to numerous roads in Weld County. Flooding caused damage to the following Weld County vehicles: ' 1 . 2008 Ford Crown Victoria Police Cruiser, VIN 2FAFP71V28X163213. was located on WCR21 approaching WCR14. Lat. 40. 58152, Long. -104. 86979. Vehicle was inundated with flood water Damage Description and that damaged the vehicle. Dimensions: 2. 2007 Transport Mini Van. VIN 2FMZA51667BA18978. located at Birch Street and Firestone Blvd. Del Camino. Co. Lat. 40. 16056. Long. - 104. 96108. Vehicle flooded at intersection and damaged the vehicle. 3. 2011 Ford Crown Victoria Police Cruiser. VIN 2FABP7BV8BX181946. located at intersection of CR 18 and CR 23. Lat 40. 11638. Long -104.84524. Vehicle got stranded in high water and was partially submerged causing damage to the engine and electronic engine components. PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00860(0): Work Completed: 1 . Replaced the 2008 Ford Crown Victoria police cruiser at $26. 178. 00 with typical police cruiser packaging at $11 . 312.50 minus the captured value of -$1 , 330.00 for total of $36. 160. 50 as shown on attached spreadsheet. (Attachments 1 and 2.) 2. Replace the 2007 Mini Van with a like-type vehicle at current Kelly Blue Value of $7,993. 00 minus the salvage value of $1 . 045.00 for total of $6,948.00. (See attached spreadsheet and attachment 4. ) 3. Repaired the 2011 Ford Crown Victoria Police Cruiser for $6,343.60. (Copy of DAMAGE INVOICE attached. ) Total $49.452. 10. (See attached spreadsheet for costs summary. ) The 2008 Ford and the 2007 Mini Van were determined to have damage in excess of replacement costs. and both were sold at auction. The 2011 Ford was partially flooded and was repaired. The Applicant has insurance on the vehicles. Latitude and longitude on PW front page is for the Weld County office at 1150 O St. . Greeley, CO. NOTES: ' 1 . The salvage sale of totaled vehicles and vehicle repairs as described above had been completed at the time this worksheet was written. Actual salvage sale results for the 2008 Ford and the 2007 Mini Van and invoice for repair of the 2011 Ford were submitted for the work. (Copies attached. ) Copies of the Purchase Orders for the new Patrol Vehicle (attachment 1 ) and typical police cruiser packaging (attachment 2) are attached. The 2007 Mini Van will be replaced with a like-type vehicle at https://connect I .dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination .do?. .. 5/6/2014 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 5 of 12 current Kelly Blue Book value minus salvage value as determined by QA/QC review. (See attachment 4. ) 2. Police reports were filled for the 2008 Ford and the 2011 Ford vehicles and are attached. 3. Frontier Adjusters provided estimates for the damages to the 2011 Ford and the 2007 Ford Freestar and provided payments for the estimates. (Copies attached. ) 4. Pursuant to 44 CFR 13.42. Grantees and Subgrantees are required to retain records, including source documentation. to support expenditures/costs incurred against the grant award. for 3 years from the date of submission to FEMA of the final Financial Status Report. 5. Payment for small projects is made at the time of project approval. based on validated documentation included in the PW. including documents. site visit observations and/or photos. At the time that this PW was written, no documentation was available regarding DAC. Since DAC can only be validated through documentation provided by the applicant. no allowance was included. Associated eligible work is related to administration of the PA project only and in accordance with 44 CFR Scope of Work: 13.22. These costs are treated consistently and uniformly as direct costs in all federal awards and other subgrantee activities and are not included in any approved indirect costs. 6. Project was reviewed for 406 Hazard Mitigation and determination is made that mitigation is not feasible. 7. The applicant is aware that all projects are subject to an insurance review as stated in 44 C. F. R. Sections 206.252 and 206.253. If applicable. an insurance determination will be made either as anticipated proceeds or actual proceeds in accordance with the applicant's insurance policy that may affect the total amount of the project. Applicant's insurance policies are on file in the JFO. 8. The applicant is required to adhere to State and Federal Government Procurement rules and regulations and maintain adequate records to support the basis for all purchasing of goods and materials and contracting services for projects approved under the Public Assistance program, as stated in 44 CFR 13.36. The applicant has advised they have followed their normal procurement procedures. Hazard Mitigation Proposal Is effective mitigation feasible on this site? No If you answered Yes to the above question, the next question is required Will mitigation be performed on this site? No If you answered Yes to the above question. the next question is required Do you wish to attach a Hazard Mitigation No Proposal? If you answered Yes to the above question, the next two questions are required Please provide the Scope of Work for the estimate: (maximum 4000 characters) https://connect I .dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatch Destination.do?... 5/6/2014 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 6 of 12 Would you like to add the Hazard Mitigation No Proposal as a cost line item to the project cost? GIS Coordinates Project Location Latitude Longitude WCR21 and WCR14 40. 11638 -104.84524 40. 58152 -104. 86979 40. 16056 -104.96108 Special Considerations 1 . Does the damaged facility or item of work have insurance coverage and/or is it an insurable Yes risk (e. g. , buildings. equipment, vehicles, etc)? If you would like to make any comments, please enter them below. (maximum 4000 characters) Insurance documents on file in the JFO. 2. Is the damaged facility located within a floodplain or coastal high hazard area and/or does it No have an impact on a floodplain or wetland? 3. Is the damaged facility or item of work located within or adjacent to a Coastal Barrier No Resource System Unit or an Otherwise Protected Area? 4. Will the proposed facility repairs/reconstruction change the pre-disaster conditions (e.g. , No footprint, material. location. capacity, use of function)? 5. Does the applicant have a hazard mitigation proposal or would the applicant like technical No assistance for a hazard mitigation proposal? 6. Is the damaged facility on the National Register of Historic Places or the state historic No listing? Is it older than 50 years? Are there more. similar buildings near the site? 7. Are there any pristine or undisturbed areas on, or near, the project site? Are there large No tracts of forestland? 8. Are there any hazardous materials at or adjacent to the damaged facility and/or item of No work? 9. Are there any other environmental or controversial issues associated with the damaged No facility and/or item of work? Attachments For Category C, D, E, F, and G Projects only Is effective mitigation feasible on this project? No If you answered Yes to the above question. the next question is required Will mitigation be performed on any sites in this No project? If you answered Yes to the above question, the next question is required Do you wish to attach a Hazard Mitigation No Proposal? If you answered Yes to the above question, the next two questions are required Please provide the Scope of Work for the estimate: Would you like to add the Hazard Mitigation No Proposal as a cost line item to the project cost? Comments https://connectl .dhs.gov/emm ie/,DanaInfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination .do?... 5/6/2014 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 7 of 12 Attachments Cost Estimate Is this Project Worksheet for (Preferred) Repair Material and/or Unit Unit of Subgrant Cost Sequence Code Description Quantity Measure Unit Price Budget Type Estimate Action Class 't't* Version 0 *** Other 1 0000 Work Completed Other $ 0.00 2 9008 Equipment 1 LS 49.452. 10 EQUIPMENT Other $ 49.452. 10 Total Cost : $ 49,452.10 Insurance Adjustments (Deductibles. Proceeds and Settlements) - 5900/5901 Material and/or Unit Unit of Subgrant Cost Sequence Code Description Quantity Measure Unit Price Budget Type Estimate Action Class *** Version 0 *** 1 ,t Deduct Actual Insurance 1 LS $ $ -10,332.86 Proceeds 10. 332.86 Total Cost : $ -10,332.86 Total Cost Estimate: $ 39,119.24 (Preferred Estimate Type + Insurance Adjustments) Comments the insurance was deducted twice in error. TFL Jose Palacio4-11 -2014 made adjustment. Attachments User Date D Type Document Description Hard Copy File Reference File Name Action STEPHEN 04-03- Calculation 4145-WELCO09-WELD SPREADSHEET.pdf SUHY 2014 Sheet SPREADSHEET COUNTY- View SPREADSHEET (7.47 kb) Existing Insurance Information Insurance Type Policy No. Bldg/Property Content Insurance Deductible Years Amount Amount Amount Amount Required Flood 20412751 $ 50.000. 000.00 $ 50, 000. 000.00 $ 50.000, 000. 00 $ 500.00 1 Required Insurance Information Insurance Type Policy No. Bldg/Property Content Insurance Deductible Years https://connectl .dhs.gov/emmie/,DanaInfo=isource. tema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination .do?... 5/6/2014 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 8 of 12 Amount Amount Amount Amount Required Vehicle TBD - Vehicle 1 $ 36. 160. 50 $ 0. 00 $ 36, 160.50 $ 0. 00 0 Vehicle TBD - Vehicle 2 $ 6. 948.00 $ 0. 00 $ 6. 948.00 $ 0. 00 0 Vehicle TBD - Vehicle 3 $ 6. 343.60 $ 0. 00 $ 6. 343.60 $ 0.00 0 Insurance Adjustments (Deductibles, Proceeds and Settlements) - 5900/5901 Unit Unit of Subgrant Cost # Code Material and/or Description Quantity Measure Unit Price Budget Type Estimate Action Class 't*'k Version 0 't'F'k 1 5900 Deduct Actual Insurance 1 LS $ - Proceeds 10. 332.86 $ -10. 332.86 Total Cost: $ -10,332.86 Comments Attachments Comments and Attachments Name of Section Comment Attachment 2011 & 2008 FORD ACCIDENT REPORT .pdf ACCIDENT REPORT.pdf Auction Report.pdf MAP VEH 2011 .pdf Damage Facilities MAP VEH 2007 VAN.pdf MAP VEH 2008 FORD.pdf ATTACH 1 .pdf ATTCH 4.pdf Insurance Claim .pdf ATTACH 2.pdf DAMAGE INVOICE.pdf Cost Estimate the insurance was deducted twice in error. TFL Jose SPREADSHEET.pdf Palacio4-11 -2014 made adjustment. Form 90-91 DDD-SOW VEHICLES.docx Bundle Reference # (Amendment #) Date Awarded PA-08-CO-4145-State-0044(43) 04-15-2014 Subgrant Application - FEMA Form 90-91 Note: The Effective Cost Share for this application is 75% FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY PROJECT WORKSHEET DISASTER PROJECT NO. PA ID NO. DATE CATEGORY WELCO09 123-99123- 04-03-2014 E FEMA 4145 - DR -CO 00 https://connect I .dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource. tema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 5/6/2014 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 9 of 12 APPLICANT: WELD (COUNTY) WORK COMPLETE AS OF: 02-05-2014 : 100 % Site 1 of 1 DAMAGED FACILITY. COUNTY: Weld VEHICLES LOCATION: LATITUDE: LONGITUDE. 40. 11638 -104.84524 40. 16056 -104.96108 40.58152 -104.86979 PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00860(0): 2008 Ford located on WCR21 approaching WCR14. 2007 Mini Van located at Birch Street and Firestone Blvd. Del Camini. CO. and 2011 Ford located at intersectin of CR 18 and CR 23. DAMAGE DESCRIPTION AND DIMENSIONS: PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00860(0): During the incident period of September 11 . 2013 to September 30. 2013. Weld County. Colorado received heavy rainfall and debris in the creeks. streams and rivers which caused flooding to numerous roads in Weld County. Flooding caused damage to the following Weld County vehicles: '1 . 2008 Ford Crown Victoria Police Cruiser, VIN 2FAFP71V28X163213. was located on WCR21 approaching WCR14. Lat. 40.58152, Long. -104.86979. Vehicle was inundated with flood water that damaged the vehicle. 2. 2007 Transport Mini Van, VIN 2FMZA51667BA18978. located at Birch Street and Firestone Blvd. Del Camino. Co. Lat. 40.16056. Long. -104.96108. Vehicle flooded at intersection and damaged the vehicle. 3. 2011 Ford Crown Victoria Police Cruiser. VIN 2FABP7BV8BX181946. located at intersection of CR 18 and CR 23. Lat 40.11638. Long -104.84524. Vehicle got stranded in high water and was partially submerged causing damage to the engine and electronic engine components. SCOPE OF WORK: PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00860(0): Work Completed: 1 . Replaced the 2008 Ford Crown Victoria police cruiser at $26,178.00 with typical police cruiser packaging at $11 .312.50 minus the captured value of -$1 .330.00 for total of S36,160.50 as shown on attached spreadsheet. (Attachments 1 and 2.) 2. Replace the 2007 Mini Van with a like-type vehicle at current Kelly Blue Value of $7,993.00 minus the salvage value of $1 .045.00 for total of 56,948.00. (See attached spreadsheet and attachment 4.) 3. Repaired the 2011 Ford Crown Victoria Police Cruiser for $6,343.60. (Copy of DAMAGE INVOICE attached.) Total $49,452.10. (See attached spreadsheet for costs summary.) The 2008 Ford and the 2007 Mini Van were determined to have damage in excess of replacement costs. and both were sold at auction. The 2011 Ford was partially flooded and was repaired. The Applicant has insurance on the vehicles. Latitude and longitude on PW front page is for the Weld County office at 1150 0 St., Greeley. CO. NOTES: '1 . The salvage sale of totaled vehicles and vehicle repairs as described above had been completed at the time this worksheet was written. Actual salvage sale results for the 2008 Ford and the 2007 Mini Van and invoice for repair of the 2011 Ford were submitted for the work. (Copies attached.) Copies of the Purchase Orders for the new Patrol Vehicle (attachment 1 ) and typical police cruiser packaging (attachment 2) are attached. The 2007 Mini Van will be replaced with a like-type vehicle at current Kelly Blue Book value minus salvage value as determined by QA/QC review. (See attachment 4.) 2. Police reports were filled for the 2008 Ford and the 2011 Ford vehicles and are attached. 3. Frontier Adjusters provided estimates for the damages to the 2011 Ford and the 2007 Ford Freestar and provided payments for the estimates. (Copies attached.) 4. Pursuant to 44 CFR 13.42. Grantees and Subgrantees are required to retain records. including source documentation, to support expenditures/costs incurred against the grant award, for 3 years from the date of submission to FEMA of the final Financial Status Report. 5. Payment for small projects is made at the time of project approval. based on validated documentation included in the PW, including documents, site visit observations and/or photos. At the time that this PW was written. no documentation was available regarding DAC. Since DAC can only be validated through documentation provided by the applicant, no allowance was included. Associated eligible work is related to administration of the PA project only and in accordance with 44 CFR 13.22. These costs are treated consistently and uniformly as https://connectl .dhs.gov/em m ie/.DanaInfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatch Destination.do?... 5/6/2014 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 10 of 12 direct costs in all federal awards and other subgrantee activities and are not included in any approved indirect costs. 6. Project was reviewed for 406 Hazard Mitigation and determination is made that mitigation is not feasible. 7. The applicant is aware that all projects are subject to an insurance review as stated in 44 C.F.R. Sections 206.252 and 206.253. If applicable. an insurance determination will be made either as anticipated proceeds or actual proceeds in accordance with the applicant's insurance policy that may affect the total amount of the project. Applicant's insurance policies are on file in the JFO. 8. The applicant is required to adhere to State and Federal Government Procurement rules and regulations and maintain adequate records to support the basis for all purchasing of goods and materials and contracting services for projects approved under the Public Assistance program. as stated in 44 CFR 13.36. The applicant has advised they have followed their normal procurement procedures. Does the Scope of Work change the pre-disaster conditions at the site? Yes No Special Considerations included? Yes No Hazard Mitigation proposal included? Yes No Is there insurance coverage on this facility? Yes No PROJECT COST ITEM CODE NARRATIVE QUANTITY/UNIT UNIT COST PRICE *** Version 0 *'t* Other 1 0000 Work Completed 0/LS $ 0.00 $ 0. 00 2 9008 Equipment 1 /LS $ 49.452. 10 $ 49.452. 10 3 0000 Insurance Adjustments - 5900/5901 0/LS $ 0. 00 $ 0. 00 *** Version 0 *** 4 5900 Deduct Actual Insurance Proceeds 1 /LS 10. 332.86 $ -10, 332. 86 TOTAL COST $ 39. 119.24 PREPARED BY STEPHEN SUHY TITLE Project Specialist SIGNATURE APPLICANT REP. Roy Radisill TITLE Director - OEM SIGNATURE WELD (COUNTY) : PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00860 Conditions Information Review Name Condition Type Condition Name Description Monitored Status Any change to the approved Standard scope of work will require re- Final Review Other (EHP) Condition #1 evaluation for compliance with No Approved NEPA and other Laws and Executive Orders. If ground disturbing activities occur during construction , applicant will monitor ground Standard disturbance and if any Final Review Other (EHP) Condition #3 potential archeological No Approved resources are discovered. will immediately cease construction in that area and notify the State and FEMA. This review does not address littps://connectl .dlis.gov/emm ie/.Danal n fo=isource.fema.net,SSL+d ispatch Destination.do?... 5/6/2014 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page I I of 12 all federal, state and local requirements. Acceptance of federal funding requires recipient to comply with all Final Review Other (EHP) Standard federal, state and local laws. No Approved Condition #2 Failure to obtain all pp appropriate federal. state and local environmental permits and clearances may jeopardize federal funding. If ground disturbing activities occur during construction, applicant will monitor ground Standard disturbance and if any EHP Review Other (EHP) Condition #3 potential archeological No Recommended resources are discovered. will immediately cease construction in that area and notify the State and FEMA. This review does not address all federal, state and local requirements. Acceptance of federal funding requires Standard recipient to comply with all EHP Review Other (EHP) Condition #2 federal. state and local laws. No Recommended Failure to obtain all appropriate federal, state and local environmental permits and clearances may jeopardize federal funding. Any change to the approved Standard scope of work will require re- EHP Review Other (EHP) Condition #1 evaluation for compliance with No Recommended NEPA and other Laws and Executive Orders. Pursuant to 44 CFR 206.252, and as a condition of this grant, applicant is required to purchase and maintain Insurance Conditions Insurance insurance to protect the three Review (Grant Specific) Requirement vehicles included in this PW Yes Recommended (or their replacement vehicles) against flood losses. The required amounts of insurance are $36. 160. 50. $6.948. 00. and $6. 343.60. Internal Comments No. Queue User Date/Time Reviewer Comments Award 04-15-2014 6 Review SYSTEM 05:45 PM ACCEPTED GMT Note: the grantee's comment was address with the appropriate cost adjustment. the insurance was deduct twice in error. Final Reviewer finds eligible the application and approves the Final PALACIO 04-11 -2014 funding of this project worksheet based on the applicant https://connect 1 .dhs.gov/em m ie/, Danalnfo=isource. fema.net,SSL+dispatch Desti nation.do?... 5/6/2014 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 12 of 12 Review JOSE 06: 05 PM having performed all required procurement procedures, GMT perform all required special considerations recommendations 5 such as permits to address EHP considerations and securing all actual cost documentation for the financial reconciliation of this project. Task Force Leader- J . Palacio 04/11 /2014 Grantee 04-09-2014 Insurance review indicates insurance payment of $10, 332.86 4 Review PATEL KAJAL 02: 31 AM to repair both vehicles. but this amount is deducted twice in the GMT Project Cost Summary. Category E, 100% Complete. Weld County. The applicant replaced a flood-damaged 2008 Ford Crown Victoria police cruiser. replaced a 2007 Mini Van with a like-type vehicle. and repaired engine and electronic components in a 2011 Crown Victoria police cruiser. - dsharon - 04/07/2014 15: 34: 37 GMT Project site work is not in a mapped wetland. - dsharon - 04/07/2014 15: 34:01 GMT The entire community will benefit from the completion of this project. - dsharon - 04/07/2014 15: 34: 15 GMT EHP PATTERSON 04-07-2014 Threatened and Endangered Species occur in this county but 3 03:53 PM the type of activity proposed on this Project Worksheet has Review MOLLY GMT been determined to have no effect" on this species. As identified by USFWS data. this Project is outside the range of Preble's Meadow Jumping Mouse or other federally-listed of T&E species - dsharon - 04/07/2014 15: 32: 34 GMT Project is located in Zone X, FIRM panel 0802660628C, dated September 28th . 1982 . - dsharon - 04/07/2014 15: 33:47 GMT The scope of work has been reviewed and meets the criteria of the 2013 signed Programmatic Agreement. Item V: Section J agreed to by FEMA and the SHPO. - dsharon - 04/07/2014 15:32: 17 GMT Applicant's CAPP risk pool property insurance affords coverage for flood losses to scheduled vehicles. Two of the three damaged vehicles included in this PW are so scheduled , and an insurance payment in the amount of $10.332. 86 was made for the repairs as estimated for the two covered vehicles. 04-07-2014 That payment reflected a $500 deductible applied to the claim. Insurance GILLIAM Applicant elected to sell the damaged vehicles rather than 2 Review ROBERT GMT PM repair them. Eligible project costs have been reduced to reflect insurance proceeds received by the applicant that duplicate costs included in the PW. Additional proceeds are not anticipated. Although applicant no longer owns any of the vehicles, the requirement to insure passes to replacement vehicles. Mitigation 04-07-2014 This repair/restoration project has been reviewed for mitigation 1 Review PETITT MARK 01 : 53 PM opportunities and there is no mitigation appropriate. Mark W. GMT Petitt, 406 Specialist https://connectl .dhs.gov/emm ie/,Dana[nfo=isource. fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?. . . 5/6/2014 Hello