HomeMy WebLinkAbout20151507.tiff RESOLUTION
RE: APPROVE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION FOR
BRIDGE 87/42.5B(FEMA)AND AUTHORIZE CHAIR TO SIGN
WHEREAS,the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to
Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of
administering the affairs of Weld County,Colorado,and
WHEREAS,the Board has been presented with a Community Development Block Grant
Application for Bridge 87/42.5B (FEMA) from the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and
through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, to the Colorado Department of
Public Safety, Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, commencing upon
full execution,with further terms and conditions being as stated in said application,and
WHEREAS, after review, the Board deems it advisable to approve said application, a
copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of
Weld County, Colorado, that the Community Development Block Grant Application for Bridge
87/42.5B (FEMA) from the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of
County Commissioners of Weld County,to the Colorado Department of Public Safety, Division
of Homeland Security and Emergency Management,be,and hereby is,approved.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the Chair be, and hereby is, authorized
to sign said application.
The above and foregoing Resolution was,on motion duly made and seconded, adopted
by the following vote on the 27th day of May,A.D.,2015.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WELD COUNTY,COLORADO
ATTESTI e _ , & �e-/_;ci EXCUSED
C/.d�+�/ "��' Barbara Kirkmeyer,Chair
Weld County Clerk to the Boards D
Mike Freeman,Pro-ter-
D./� /n� ` rn
D BY: ��11}y Clerk to the :oard },
��• as can P.Conway
(-----.3-
APPROVE O FOR '� I, �
R
-,;���, „IN lie A.Cozad
County Attorney Ii .\``. XCUSED
l �' •••I Steve Moreno
Date of signature: _
2015-1507
CC•Cf./VI; O- (0/2,9_ EM0016
BC0045
Colorado Division of Homeland Security Grant NOI / Application
e Emergency Management CDBG - DR Recover Colorado
Infrastructure Program
THIS SECTION FOR STATE USE ONLY
DHSEM Identification Number: Colorado Point of Contact:
CDBG-DR Program Manager
Date NOI(Part A) Received: Colorado DHSEM
9195 East Mineral Avenue, Suite 200
Date Application (Part B) Received: Centennial, Colorado 80112
Office: 720.852.6713
Date Next Steps Letter Transmitted: Fax: 720.852.6750
cdps dhsem cdbg@state.co.us
I
PART A - NOI:
PROJECT OVERVIEW
1 . Applicant Legal Name: Weld County. Colorado
2. Applicant
Type: ✓ Local Government Private Non-Profit (Attach copy of 501 c3, if applicable)
3. Project Title: County Match FEMA Projects - WELC019 (712)
4. Proposed Project Total Cost: 85.050.40
CDBG-DR-I Request: 10.631 .30
5. Certifications:
The undersigned assures fulfillment of all requirements of the CDBG-DR Recover Colorado Infrastructure Program as
contained in the program guidelines and that all information contained herein is true and correct to the best of my
knowledge. The governing body of the applicant has duly authorized the document, commits to the non-Federal and State
share identified in the Budget, and hereby applies for the assistance documented in this application. Also, the applicant
understands that the project may proceed ONLY AFTER a GRANT AGREEEMENT is approved.
Mike Freeman , Pro—Tem Weld County Commissioner (970) 356-4000
Typed Name v./Authorized loth( ant :l vent I'ti Telephone Number
MAY 272015
Signature of Authorized Applicant Agent Date Signed
2015-1507
Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 1 of 20
CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
PART A - NOI: APPLICANT INFORMATION
1 . Applicant Legal Name: Weld County. Colorado
2. FIPS Code: 123 DUNS Number: 07575-7955
3. U.S. Congressional District: 4th Congressman Name:
4. State Senatorial District: 1 Senator Name: Mr. Cory Gardner
5. State Legislative District: 50 Representative Name: Mr. Ken Buck
6. Primary Point of Contact:
The Primary Point of Contact is the person responsible for coordinating the implementation of this proposal, if approval is
granted.
Ms. \ir. 0 Mrs. .. First Name: Roy Last Name: Rudisill
Title: Director Organization: Weld County Office of Emergency Managemc
Street Address: 1 150 O Street
City: Greeley State: Colorado Zip Code: 80631
Telephone: (y / UPUu I a\ : (y / U ).Sib- fe Mobile: (9 (U ) JdS1 -U E-mail Address: rrudisill(co .weld . co
7. Alternate Point of Contact:
The Alternate Point of Contact is the person that can address questions or concerns in the Primary Point of Contact's
absence.
Ms. 0 \1r. _ vhs.n First Name: Barb Last Name: Connolly
Title: Controller Organization: Weld County Accounting
Street Address: 1150 O Street
City: Greeley State: Colorado Gip Code: 80631
Telephone: (yfU )i 1- . \ : (y / U )i.0O- i6Mobile: E-mail Address: bconnollyco .weld .
8. Application Prepared b :
Ms. II Mr. ig Mrs a First Name: Kyle Last Name: Jones
Title: Planner Organization: ARCADIS-US
Street Address:
City: TallahassE State: FL Zip Code: 32309
Telephone: (00U )4:51i F; x: Mobile: (&2b , 2U2-3 E-mail Address: kyle . iones(c�arcadis-
9. Authorized Applicant Agent:
Ms. 0 Mr. . Mrs. Ill First Name: Barbara Last Name: Kirkmeyer
Title: COMMiSSii Organization: Weld County
Street Address: 1 150 O Street, P . O . Box 758
City: Greeley state: Colorado Zip Code: 80631
Telephone: ly I U ),0O61., x: Mobile: E-mail Address: bkirkmeyer a(�co .welc
The Authorized Applicant Agent MUST be the chief executive officer, mayor, etc. This person must be able to sign
contracts, authorize funding allocations or payments, etc.
Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 2 of 20
CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
PART A - NOI: PROJECT DESCRIPTION & NATIONAL OBJECTIVES MET
1. Project— Eligible Activity Description:
Describe the proposed project. Explain how the proposed project will address recovery and/or resilience needs in your
community either independently or as part of a larger project. Include a description of the desired outcome and the
recovery objective(s) to be achieved. This narrative should describe the CDBG-DR Eligible Activity.
In an effort to achieve resiliency from the severe storms and minimize risk to the general
public, Weld County addressed severe damage to local roadways , bridges, culverts,
removed hazardous roadway debris, made emergency repairs to paved and gravel
roadways , addressed river embankments/dangerous conditions to the public and made
repairs to emergency response vehicles that were damaged during the Incident Period .
FEMA Categories A, B , C , and E were addressed in the Weld County FEMA Match . CDBG
funds are needed to be applied towards the Weld County FEMA Local Match for the
emergency work that was identified on previously submitted Project Worksheets . All
projects covered under the Weld County Project Worksheets were vital for Weld County to
clear hazardous debris from roadways/creeks/streams and enhance their infrastructure ,
river embankments, equipment and roadways . This particular NOI/Application will discuss
IA/CI rani n /71O1 1-Inn frnir,r+} IA/rNrlrr•hnn+ in n++emnknrl ',rnrl nr.r.t},lir-Nn rleNhnilr-r1 nrnnr i-% of usrrrlr 0
2. Site / Physical Location: Describe the area(s) affected/protected by this project, including location by complete street
address and longitude and latitude (coordinates in decimal degrees).
The latitude is 40 . 307930 and longitude is - 104 .244820 . The attached spreadsheet shows
the Lat/Long coordinates for all of the Project Worksheets and depicts the damage site
locations as identified in the correlating Project Worksheets . However; the area affected ri
3. Population Served: Briefly describe the demographics of the population served or protected by this project. Include
the percent of the overall community population benefiting from this project. Explain your response.
An estimated 90% or more of the community benefited from the proactive work by Weld
County and the removal of hazardous debris and the emergency work/repairs made to the
roadways , bridges, equipment and culverts. The population benefiting from this Match
Project will include an LMI level population percentage that will be directly or indirectly
impacted through this project. This NOI and the associated PW impacted the entire County
and demographic area . White : 67 .6% , Hispanic: 28 .3% , Other: 1 . 6% , Asian : 1 . 3% , Black :
0 .8% , Native American : 0 .4% . Weld County consists of 99, 317 households with a median
househo d income of $56.589 and the majority o- We d Coun_v is owner-occupied wi _h
4. Priority of this Project: If you are submitting more than one CDBG-DR Infrastructure NOI, what is the relative
priority of this project? Please indicate the priority as: Priority # of## Projects Submitted.
Priority 21 of 36 Projects Submitted .
Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 3 of 20
CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
PART A - NOI : CDBG-DR FUNDING QUALIFICATIONS
Community Development Block Grant — Disaster Recovery (CDBG-DR) funding can be approved for a project in which
ALL of the following requirements are met The physical location of the activity must be within a county listed in Table 1 of
the program Recover Colorado Infrastructure Grant Program Guidelines (Guidelines).
1. Connection to Disaster Recovery
CDBG's Disaster Recovery funds must be used for necessary expenses related to disaster relief, long-term recovery,
restoration of infrastructure and housing, economic revitalization, and mitigation from future damages.. The activity
must show a direct link to damages received during one or more of the events listed in Table 1 of the Guidelines. Please
provide a brief explanation of how the proposed acquisition activity: (1 ) was a result of the disaster event; (2) will
restore infrastructure or revitalize the economy; or will (3) mitigate future damages.
During the incident period of September 11 , 2013 to September 30, 2013, Weld County,
Colorado received heavy rainfall and debris in the creeks , streams and rivers which caused
surface gravel removal and scour damage to numerous roads and bridges in Weld County.
This NOI Application request addresses emergency work and the damages that were a
r,,. . 14 �F �� � n .. . .r.r� �� � � �.v� ir T{-� � � ���. ri-. n1n / 4 -. . 4 .. •
2. Compliance with National Objectives
State recipients receiving allocations under the CDBG-DR program must certify that their projected use of funds
will ensure, and maintain evidence, that each of its activities assisted with CDBG-DR funds meets at least one of
the three National Objectives.
a) Which of the National Objectives are met by proposed project?
r, Will benefit low and moderate income (LMI) persons; or
_I Will aid in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight; or
If Is an Urgent Need in which meet community development needs having a particular urgency because
existing conditions pose a serious and immediate threat to the health or welfare of the community where
other financial resources are not available to meet such needs.
b) How will the proposed project meet the above checked National Objective(s).
See attached LMI data for the Project.
In addition to the LMI data attached , the State of Colorado (according to ACS
2008-2012 5Y ) lists Weld County at a 41 . 0% LMI . In reviewing the LMI data for this
Project NOI , the PW associated LMI % was 38 . 16% . However, this percentage does not
accurately capture the total number of service areas that are either directly or indirectly
impacted by the FEMA Match Projects. The entire community benefited from the
proactive emergency work by Weld County and the removal of hazardous debris and
the work/repairs made to the roadways , bridges, equipment and culverts thus the
County believes that a higher LMI % should be given for this FEMA match Projects.
The general vicinity of FEMA Match Projects encompasses the entire County and
greatly benefits the entire LMI population for this project, which is why the County
believes that this project not only meets, but exceeds the 50% requirement for meeting
the National Objective . The emergency work/repairs that were made under the WELCO
PW's for the Local FEMA Match drastically reduced hazardous conditions for the
general public and enabled Weld County to focus on resiliency efforts post storm . It is
believed that the service area for Project Site Locations benefited multiple LMI tract
sections and thus a higher weighted percentage of over 50% should be noted for this Q
Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 4 of 20
CUB(;-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
3. Compliance with the primary objective. As indicated in the Guidelines: "A proposed project's benefits to LMI
persons will be an important factor in evaluating potential infrastructure projects. A total of 20% of the Recover
Colorado Infrastructure project funding must benefit LMI persons. Due to the very low percentage of LMI projects
submitted in the first round of infrastructure funding, it is estimated that approximately 25% to 30% of the funding
available in this second allocation must meet the LMI requirement to make up for the deficit."
This section does not need to be completed if the project does not meet this National Objective.
The primary objective for using CDBG Disaster Recovery funds is benefitting, by at least 51 percent, persons of low and
moderate income. The following section provides the information necessary to complete this requirement.
a) Is the proposed activity: / jurisdiction wide specified target area
If you checked specified target area, which data source was used? (Note: select the smallest unit of Census data that
encompasses your proposed target area.)
b) Enter the number of households involved in the proposed project. 99, 317
c) In the space below, describe how the applicant will comply with the requirement that at least 51 percent of CDBG-DR
dollars will principally benefit low- and moderate-income households and persons.
Weld County will comply with the 51 % requirement due to the fact that the PW
associated under this NOI Project for the FEMA County Match is targeted to areas of the
county that qualify as LMI . The justification behind this methodology is that multiple
d) Enter the number of households within each income category expected to benefit from the proposed project.
Incomes above 80% of the County Median 785
Incomes above 50% and up to 80% of the County Median 1265
Incomes at or below 50% of the County Median 2060
e) Which type of income was used to determine the above? (Check only one)
As determined by the American Community Survey (Public Facilities projects)
1 Annual income as defined for Public Housing and Section 8
I Annual income as reported under the Census long form
Adjusted gross income as defined for reporting under IRS
Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 5 of 20
( 'DRG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
PART A - NOI: COMPREHENSIVE RISK ANALYSIS INFORMATION
1 . Community Hazards Review: Please list and briefly describe in rank order of importance the natural or man-made
hazards in your (the Applicant's) service area.
The hazards identified within this Project for the FEMA County Match for WELCO19 (712 )
would be ranked in the following manner: Flood , Erosion and Subsidence .
The hazards caused significant damage and posed a severe risk to the community for the
designated incident period .
2. High Risk Hazards Addressed by the Project:
Describe how, and the degree to which, the proposed project mitigates high risk hazards. Include damage history, source
and type of problem, frequency of event(s), and severity of damage information, if available.
Hazard 1
Flooding caused the most severe damage to Weld County during the designated incident
period and this Project addressed and mitigated against severe flood damage to local
roadways, bridges, culverts, removed hazardous debris along roadways . In addition ,
County Officials ensured repairs were made to paved and gravel roadways for the safety of
the community and addressed river embankments/dangerous conditions to the public and
made repairs to emergency response vehicles that were damaged during the Incident
Period . The repairs made brought the damaged infrastructure back to its pre-disaster
condition in accordance with regulations .
Hazard 2
Erosion also caused a severe issue for the County. This Project addressed and mitigated
against severe erosion damage to local roadways , shoulders , and embankments. The work
that was conducted by the County mitigated against any immediate threat/hazard to the
damaged infrastructure and restored the infrastructure back to its pre-disaster condition in
accordance with regulations .
Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 6 of 20
CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
Hazard 3
Subsidence was another critical hazard that caused dangerous conditions for the
community . This Project addressed and mitigated against severe subsidence damage to
local roadways, shoulders, bridges and embankments . The work that was conducted by the
County mitigated against any immediate threat/hazard to the damaged infrastructure and
restored the infrastructure back to its pre-disaster condition in accordance with regulations .
Note: If your proposed project addresses more than three Hazards, please provide that information as an
attachment.
3. Elimination of Risk: Does the proposed project result in the elimination of a hazard from your (the Applicant's) service
area? If so, please describe. If not, please estimate the degree to which this project will mitigate the risk from the hazards
identified in Item #2.
The Proposed FEMA Local Match for WELCO19 (712 ) does not completely eliminate the
hazards identified from the service area . The Proposed FEMA Match Project does allow
Weld County to receive a percentage of funds back that the County expended during one of
the most costly disasters in Colorado history however. These types of hazards that
occurred in Weld County and throughout Colorado are truly an act of mother nature and the
County was as prepared as it could have been but the severity/duration of the incident was
of an unprecedented nature . Weld County cannot eliminate the risk of future flooding ,
erosion or land subsidence , but Local Officials can ensure that their community is prepared
for future incident, take the necessary precautions and that their infrastructure is restored o
4. Environmental Quality Improvements: Does the proposed project result in an improvement in the quality of the natural
environment in your (the Applicant's) service area? If so, please describe.
Yes; the damages that attributed to the designated incident period and FEMA-DR 4145
were addressed via the previously submitted PW and the work conducted to restore the
infrastructure back to its pre-disaster condition was implemented . The work done at this
site location (see previous attachment for lat/long coordinates ) addressed not only
improvements/repairs made to the infrastructure, but also improvements and repairs to the
river embankments and any potential erosion or subsidence issues that could have
tArnrcnnrlr4 if thn (`ni intkr nnf fnl'nn thn nrr»r•tiirn rnnnei irnc fin ,-14. thew did a
5. Climate Change Improvements: Does the proposed project reduce or ameliorate a projected impact of climate change
in Colorado? If so, please briefly describe the benefit of the project.
This Proposed Project reduces a projected impact climate change due to the proactive
mitigation measures that were undertaken by Weld County during the designated incident
period . This was accomplished by ensuring that the damaged site location was addressed
as soon , but as safely , as possible , and not to sustain any further impacts to the site
locations or environment that would enable the damage to enhance the projected impact of
any potential climate changes.
Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 7 of 20
CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
6. Community Process: Does the proposed project include a community planning or involvement process that increases
community resiliency? If so, please briefly describe the process.
This Proposed Project was initiated by County Officials in an effort to achieve resiliency
from the severe storms and also to minimize risk to the community, Weld County addressed
the severe flood damage to the roadways and infrastructure by ensuring that dangerous
conditions for the public were addressed and mitigated properly and efficiently.
7. Reduction in the Costs of Future Response or Recovery: Will the proposed project result in a reduction in the cost
of response or recovery from an incident occurring due to one or more of the hazards identified in Item #1 or #2? If so,
please briefly describe how response or recovery costs will be reduced.
For a small scale flooding incident. yes; however, the flooding that occurred during the
designated incident period was catastrophic and the PW associated with the NOI FEMA
Local Match Request were completed to address the damages .
8. Floodplain/Floodway/Substantially Damaged Properties: Does the proposed project include a property or
properties located in a floodway or floodplain; or not located in a regulatory floodplain but which were substantially
damaged or have a history of damage from at least two disaster events? If so, please identify those properties below.
No; the Proposed Project is for the FEMA Local Match for WELCO19 (712 ) from CDBG-DR
in regards to expenses from CAT C Damage Categories for the designated incident period
for FEMA-DR 4145 .
9. Mitigation Planning:
Does your community have a current FEMA approved multi-hazard mitigation plan? Yes N o
Location of proposed project in mitigation plan strategies: Page 13 9 Section/Part Mitigation Stra
ra
Is the community a member of good standing with the National Flood Insurance Program? Yes Nu
Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and c-mail submittal. Page 8 of 20
CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
10. Community Plan Compliance:
p Does the proposed project comply with and/or address an issue recognized in key
community plans? Key plans include, but are not limited to: a Comprehensive Master Plan, a Stormwater Management Plan,
a Hazard Mitigation Plans, or key community codes. If so, please describe how the project integrates into the plan(s).
Yes; the Proposed Project complies with all local community plans and this Project
integrates into the Plans because the County addressed the damages to local roadways
and infrastructure and mitigated damages that posed a serious risk/hazard to the
community during the incident period . This FEMA PW was initiated by Weld County and via
this Proposed Project, the County requests that CDBG funds be applied towards the local
FEMA Match for this Project .
11. Environmental / Historic Preservation Issues: Please describe any significant environmental, historic, or cultural features
that may be affected by the project. Please also describe any features that may be improved by the project.
All environmental issues are addressed on the attached Project Worksheet as supporting
documentation . The significant EHP issues were in regards to the Endangered Species Act
(ESA) and EHP Standard Conditions. All items were addressed and any additional
supporting backup documentation can be provided upon request.
I
12. Permitting: Please list the local, state, and federal permits that will be required to complete this project.
All permitting was addressed on the attached Project Worksheet as supporting
documentation . The significant permitting issues were in regards to the Endangered
Species Act (ESA) and EHP Standard Conditions. All items were addressed and
supporting backup documentation can be provided upon request. Please see below for
environmental permits that were obtained .
Floodplain Permit
nnA Qnrrni+ a
Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and c-mail submittal. I'agc 9 of 20
('UR(;-1)K Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergence Management
13. Community Resilience: Please describe how this project will increase the resilience of your community. As defined in the
Guidelines: "Resilience incorporates hazard mitigation and land use planning strategies; critical infrastructure, environmental
and cultural resource protection; and sustainability practices to reconstruct the built environment, and revitalize the economic,
social, and natural environments."
In an effort to achieve resiliency from the severe storms and minimize risk to the general
public, Weld County addressed severe damage to local roadways, bridges, culverts,
removed hazardous debris roadways , made repairs to paved and gravel roadways ,
addressed river embankments/dangerous conditions to the public and made repairs to
emergency response vehicles that were damaged during the Incident Period .
This Proposed Project addresses proactive work initiated by Weld County during FEMA-DR
4145 enabled the community to recover in an expeditious manner and increased the
resilience of the community by incorporating nearly every aspect of sustainability and
revitalizing the community. The community was able to recover quicker due to the proactive
work done through this Proposed Project and the associated PW's .
14. Maps
Please attach the following maps with the project site and structures marked on the map. Use SAME ID number as in
the Individual Property Worksheets.
Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM). If the FIRM for your area is not published, please attach a copy of the Flood
Hazard Boundary Map (FHBM).
City or county scale map (large enough to show the entire project area)
USGS 1 :24,000 topo map
Parcel Map (Tax Map, Property Identification Map, etc.)
Overview photographs. The photographs should be representative of the project area, including any relevant
streams, creeks, rivers, etc., and drainage areas which affect the project site of will be affected by the project.
15. Additional Comments (Optional): Enter any additional comments related to the proposed project's ability to reduce
hazard risk and increase community resiliency.
This proposed project reduced the hazard risk to the community and increased resiliency by
the work conducted through the PW in correlation with FEMA-DR 4145 . CDBG funds are
being requested to be applied to the local FEMA Match ( 12 . 5% ) for the PW.
All maps are located in project files that were previously submitted and will be provided
upon request.
The entire rnmmilnity benefited from the nrnartive work by Weld County and the removal ra
Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 10 of 20
S I
CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
PART A - NOI: DECISION MAKING PROCESS
Decision-Making Process:
Describe the process you used to decide that this project is the best solution to the problem. Explain why this project is
the best alternative you considered. Address questions such as:
• Are you focusing on the area in your community that has the greatest potential for losses?
• Have you considered the risks to critical facilities and structures and benefits to be obtained by mitigating this
vulnerability?
• Have you considered those areas or projects that present the greatest opportunities given the current situation(s)
of interest in your community?
• Are you addressing a symptom or the source of the problem? Addressing the source of the problem is a long-term
solution which provides the most mitigation benefits.
• If impacts to the environment, natural, cultural or historic resources have been identified, explain how your alternatives
and proposed project address, minimize, or avoid these impacts.
The Site locations within this WELCO PW in the Proposed Project were identified due to
the high dollar amount of funds that were expended by Weld County to ensure the safety of
the community and also restore county infrastructure back to its pre-disaster condition . This
Proposed Project has site locations across the entire community and service area and it
was determined that a large percentage of the LMI population was impacted by the severe
flooding incident and the proactive work by County Officials enabled the community to
recover quicker, thus allowing the community to sustain resiliency and return operations to
normal .
2. Acquisition Projects - Describe the community's methodology for selecting the properties to be acquired in this application
and how each is ranked (highest to lowest):
N/A
Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page I I of 20
CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
PART A - NOI : SCOPE OF WORK I BUDGET OVERVIEW / FINANICAL FACTORS
1. Project Scope: Please provide a comprehensive and detailed description of the scope of the proposed project.
Describe each of the project components and the steps necessary to complete that work. If the proposed project is a
funding match for another disaster recovery or infrastructure development program, please identify the
agency, program funds, and project reference number that CDBG-DR funding is intended to support. Also
describe any critical deadlines that must be met to accomplish this work.
This Proposed Project is for the Local FEMA Match for costs for WELCO19 (712 ). These
costs were incurred as a result of FEMA-DR 4145 . During the incident period of September
11 , 2013 to September 30 , 2013 , Weld County , Colorado received heavy rainfall and debris
in the creeks , streams and rivers which caused severe flooding to and along roadways and
surface streets , and also severely damaged local infrastructure . This NOI Application
request addresses the emergency work / damages that were a direct result of the severe
flooding .
A Scope of Work is included within the PW and addresses the work that was completed .
2. Community Priority: Please describe why this project is a priority for your organization.
This Proposed Project is a priority for Weld County to utilize the CDBG funding as the Local
FEMA Match to offset the costs for the proactive work done by the County to reduce
hazardous conditions to the community .
Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 12 of 20
('DKG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
3. Project Cost Summary: Please summarize the major cost components of the project. Please round all values to the
nearest dollar.
a. Planning / Engineering / Design $
b. Environmental Compliance $ The value of general and/or
c. Real Property Acquisition / Demolition $ professional labor wages must
be tabulated in accordance
d. Closing Costs / Legal Fees $ with the Davis Bacon Act of
e. Housing Program Assistance $ 1931
f. Construction Costs $
g. Project Delivery Costs $
h. Other (specify below) $ 85.050.40
See Protect Worksheet Cost (attached ) i. Total of a-h $ 85 050 40
j. Duplication of Benefits (if unknown at time of application enter zero). $ 0.00
k. Subtract j. from i. to determine Total Project Cost $ 85.050 40
Notes: Housing Program Assistance costs include the cost of compliance with Uniform Relocation Assistance (URA) and
Comparable Housing Assistance (CHA) requirements. Project Delivery Costs include the costs of project delivery by the
sponsoring organization but do not include administrative overhead.
4. Total Project Cost Allocations
Proposed Project Total Cost: $ 85,050.40
Federal Cost Share: $ 63,780.30
State Cost Share: $ 10,631 .30
$ 10.631 .30
Local Cost Share
5. Basis of Cost Estimate: Briefly describe how the cost estimates listed in #3 above were developed (e.g. lump sum, unit cost,
quotation, etc.).
The Cost Estimates were developed above from actual work that was properly procured
and conducted . They come directly off of what was included on the FEMA approved PW
and the costs are broken down by type of work and site.
6. Project Management: Describe how you will manage the costs and schedule, and how you will ensure successful
performance.
The work for this Proposed Project has been completed or is pending completion . The
12 . 5% CDBG Local Match will be applied towards the Weld County Match for FEMA PW's
and the costs that were previously incurred during the disaster.
Note: The applicant must agree to furnish quarterly reports during the entire time the project is in active status. Quarters end
on March 31st, June 30th, September 30th, and December 31st. Reports are due to the State within 15 days after the end of
each quarter.)
kttach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 13 of 20
a
CDB(;-I)R Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
7. Project Maintenance Requirements: The following questions are to give assurance on the project's maintenance over
its useful life. Please answer each question and give a brief explanation.
a. If the project involves the acquisition of real property, what is the proposed land use after acquisition? (i.e., Agriculture,
Recreation, Vacant Land, Park, Wetlands, etc.)
N/A
b. Will the project require periodic maintenance?
No
c. If yes, who will provide the maintenance?
N/A
d. What is the estimated cost of maintenance on an annual basis?
0
Note: Cost of maintenance is considered an application prioritization weighting factor. Projects with high maintenance
costs have a greater risk of future failure due to deferred maintenance. Therefore, the responses provided above should be
as complete and verifiable as possible in order to minimize the likelihood of ranking point reductions due to maintenance
concerns.
S. Additional Comments: Enter any additional comments related to the proposed project's funding, if desired .
CDBG funds are needed for the 12 .5% Local FEMA Match and the associated PW that is
included in the NOI-Application .
9. Financial / Fiscal Health Factors: Please indicate the total budget (all funds) of your organization. Please describe the
impact of disaster recovery efforts to date on this budget. In addition, if this objective is selected based on the local
governments inability to finance the activity, the municipality must also include in the application package a resolution stating
this fact and supporting documentation such as budgetary information, a description of TABOR restrictions, and the most
recent audit report or approved exemption from audit.
Weld County's total 2015 budget is $307,031 ,089 .00 . The impact of the September, 2013
flooding has primary been on the damage to the county's road and bridge system . The
damage has resulted in Weld County having to transfer $5 million from the Contingency
Fund to the Public Works Fund in 2013 and in 2014 for a total of $ 10 million dollars . Without
assistance from FEMA, FWHA, and CDBG the amount would have several million more .
The impact has also forced the county to shift local resources from projects unrelated to
flooding to deal with the emergency situations created by the flood in both the 2013 and
2014 fiscal years . Even in 2015 the county is still using local resources to recover from the
flooding . Fortunately, Weld County has always been fiscally conservative and budgeted
responsibly. Had the county not taken the responsible approach to its finances county
service would have had to have been cut to cope with the flood recovery.
IA/a r Cni into nnarotnc• i , .,.-1nr tho mnct roctrir'tilimitotinn in t 'in tote RocirocD
Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 14 of 20
> •
CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
PART B - APPLICATION : PROJECT MILESTONES / TIMELINES / TASKS
1. Timeline / Tasks
Insert the proposed work schedule as tasks to accomplish the overall goal of the proposed activity (i.e., appraisals, title
search, closing, etc.), and provide a description of the task's purpose. This timeline will be used as a measurement tool
for progress in the project's implementation and is included in the required Quarterly Reports. Also, FEMA uses the
timeline for determining the approved period of performance. It will be the basis used to justify delays or extensions, if
necessary, and should be estimated carefully. The first and last entries are state requirements and have already been
entered.
Task 1 :
Grant Process and Environmental Review Timeframe: 3 Months
Task 2: Emergency Repairs- The initial emergency repairs were made directly 1 Completed
g Y p g Y p Timeframe:
Task 3: Permanent Repairs Becuase the emergency repairs were quick repair Completed
Timeframe:
Task 4:
Timeframe:
Task 5:
Timeframe:
Task 6:
Timeframe:
Task 7:
Timeframe:
Task 8:
Timeframe:
Task 9:
Timeframe:
Final Inspection Report and Project Closeout
Task I 0:
The Final Inspection Report is a review of the activity's paper documentation.
showing the project was implemented as required. Once the review is completed. the 3 Months
report and findings will be provided to the grantee for review and concurrence. The Timeframe:
State submits the concurrence to FEMA as part of a closeout package to formally
Total Project Timeframe: 6 Months
Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 15 of 20
CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
2. Start Date & Pre-Award Costs: The start date for any project begins upon GRANT AGREEMENT approval by the
State Controller. If a different start date or timeframe is needed, provide an explanation below. Also indicate if any pre-
award activities or costs have been incurred or authorized.
The proposed project is for local FEMA match dollars and the work has already been
completed . The repairs for this site began as soon as the flood waters receded and the
county crews were able to access the site . The initial phase of repairs were emergency in
nature and began in September of 2013 and concluded during November of that same year.
Permanent repairs for this site commenced the following year at the beginning of
construction season and concluded in October of 2014 . Additionally, cost were incurred
through the preparation of this NOI Application .
Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 16 of 20
_
CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
Please note that Part B is required for the final Application submittal. Part B sections
may optionally be completed and submitted with the NOI. Please update any Part A
section information when submitting you full Application.
PART B — APPLICATION : ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
1. Environmental Review Background Information & Environmental Review Worksheet:
In accordance with 24 CFR Part 58.22 (see below), all federally funded projects must accomplish an environmental review
prior to beginning any work on a project. These HUD regulations are in place for two purposes:
1 . To ensure federal funds are used to place people of low and moderate income in environmentally safe
conditions; and
2. To ensure federal funds are NOT used to negatively impact environmental conditions that exist near a
project site.
Please note the following limitations on CDBG-DR grant activities pending environmental clearance per 24 CFR Part 58.22.
(a) Neither a recipient nor any participant in the development process, including public or private nonprofit or for-profit
entities, or any of their contractors, may commit HUD assistance under a program listed in Sec. 58. 1(b) on an activity or
project until HUD or the state has approved the recipient's RROF and the related certification from the responsible
entity. In addition, until the RROF and the related certification have been approved, neither a recipient nor any
participant in the development process may commit non-HUD funds on or undertake an activity or project under a
program listed in Sec. 58. 1(b) if the activity or project would have an adverse environmental impact or limit the choice
of reasonable alternatives.
(b) N/A for DOLA/CDPS projects.
(c) If a recipient is considering an application from a prospective sub-recipient or beneficiary and is aware that the
prospective sub-recipient or beneficiary is about to take an action within the jurisdiction of the recipient that is
prohibited by paragraph (a) of this section, then the recipient will take appropriate action to ensure that the objectives
and procedures of NEPA are achieved.
(d) An option agreement on a proposed site or property is allowable prior to the completion of the environmental review
if the option agreement is subject to a determination by the recipient on the desirability of the property for the project as
a result of the completion of the environmental review in accordance with this part and the cost of the option is a
nominal portion of the purchase price. There is no constraint on the purchase of an option by third parties that have not
been selected for HUD funding, have no responsibility for the environmental review and have no say in the approval or
disapproval of the project.
(e) Self-Help Homeownership Opportunity Program (SHOP). In accordance with section 11(d)(2)(A) of the Housing
Opportunity Program Extension Act of 1996 (42 U.S.C. 12805 note), an organization, consortium, or affiliate receiving
assistance under the SHOP program may advance non-grant funds to acquire land prior to completion of an
environmental review and approval of a Request for Release of Funds (RROF) and certification, notwithstanding
paragraph (a) of this section. Any advances to acquire land prior to approval of the RROF and certification are made at
the risk of the organization, consortium, or affiliate and reimbursement for such advances may depend on the result of
the environmental review. This authorization is limited to the SHOP program only and all other forms of HUD
assistance are subject to the limitations in paragraph (a) of this section.
(1) Relocation. Funds may be committed for relocation assistance before the approval of the RROF and related
certification for the project provided that the relocation assistance is required by 24 CFR part 42.
Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 17 of 20
CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
Environmental Review Worksheet
Check ALL of the activities listed below that will be included as part of the project,
REGARDLESS OF THE FUNDING SOURCE:
❑ Information and financial services
51 Administrative and management activities
O Environmental and other studies, resource identification, and the development of plans and strategies
51 Most engineering and design costs associated with eligible projects
■ Inspections and testing of properties for hazards or defects
b • Project planning
E,,, Q ❑ Purchase of insurance
p• > c ❑ Purchase of tools
Wu Technical assistance and training
yC :.c .E ❑ Interim assistance to arrest the effects of an imminent threat or physical deterioration in which the assistance
w 0 does not alter environmental conditions.
`" p Public services that will not have a physical impact or result in any physical changes employment, child
PY PPY (e.g.,
.� care, health, education, counseling, welfare)
�- 51 Assistance for temporary or permanent improvements that do not alter environmental conditions and are limited
to protection, repair, or restoration activities necessary only to control or arrest the effects from disasters or
imminent threats to public safety including those resulting from physical deterioration
(Must also complete the Regulatory Checklist at the end of Exhibit IV-A)
E'' >_ p Operating costs (e.g., maintenance, security, operation, utilities, furnishings, equipment, supplies, staff training
Z = and recruitment, other incidental costs)
U ❑ Relocation costs
p Acquisition, repair, improvement, reconstruction, or rehabilitation when the facilities and improvements are in
place and will be retained in the same use without change in size or capacity of more than 20 percent
≥ n Special projects directed to the removal of material and architectural barriers that restrict the mobility of and
accessibility to elderly and handicapped persons
JJ Acquisition (including leasing) or disposition of, or equity loans on, an existing structure
n Acquisition (including leasing) of vacant land provided the structure or land acquired, financed, or disposed of
will be retained for the same use
Q Acquisition, repair, improvement, reconstruction, or rehabilitation when the facilities and improvements are in
place, but will change in size or capacity of more than 20 percent
n Acquisition, repair, improvement, reconstruction, or rehabilitation when the facilities and improvements are in
place, but will involve a change in land use, such as from non-residential to residential, commercial to
industrial, or from one industrial use to another
O Demolition
New construction
This checklist must be included with the CDBG application.
Please direct questions to the appropriate contact person below:
DOLA/DLG DHSEM
Tamra Norton, Environmental Compliance Officer Steven Boand, State Disaster Recovery Manager
Department of Local Affairs Department of Public Safety
1313 Sherman Street, Room 521, Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
Denver, CO 80203 9195 E Mineral Ave, Suite 200
303-866-6398 Centennial, CO 80112
720.852.6713
tatnra.notton@state.co.us steven.boand@state.co.us
DPS/DOLA USE ONLY:
Required level of environmental review: O Exempt O CENST O CESTO EA
Reviewed by:
Date of Review:
Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 18 of 20
CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
2. Supplemental Environmental Review Information
Enter any additional comments related to environmental concerns for the proposed project if desired. Please list and attach any
documents or studies that have been prepared that support the Environmental Review Worksheet responses.
All environmental issues are addressed on the attached Project Worksheet as supporting
documentation . The significant EHP issues were in regards to the Endangered Species Act
( ESA) and EHP Standard Conditions. All items were addressed and supporting backup
documentation can be provided upon request. Please see below for environmental permits that
were obtained .
Floodplain Permit
404 Nationwide Permit
Migratory Birds Permit ( if needed )
Threatened and Endangered Species Permit
Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 19 of 20
CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
PART B - APPLICATION : DETAILED PROJECT BUDGET
1. Detailed Project Budget: Please enter or attach a detailed and comprehensive final proposed budget for the project.
Please note that CDBG-DR funds may be limited to the amount submitted with the NOI pending the availability of
additional funding
This Proposed Project is for the Local FEMA Match for costs for WELCO19 (712 ). These
costs were incurred as a result of FEMA-DR 4145 . During the incident period of September
11 , 2013 to September 30 , 2013 , Weld County, Colorado received heavy rainfall and debris in
the creeks , streams and rivers which caused severe flooding to and along roadways and
surface streets , and also severely damaged local infrastructure . This Application request
addresses the emergency work / damages that were a direct result of the severe flooding .
A Scope of Work and detailed project budget is included within the PW and addresses the
work that was completed .
Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 20 of 20
N
N
7
E
0.1
U
C
E
m
E
C
m
a'
G N 17
0 0 Q E
y JI 'a u N o
c _ E
a E -132 0
a ? 6:02 c
E a)
o E
C E w O 0
o
5 O
WC 's"' 2 -0
a m
aJ v I p E
u 0 a
a) o -
E Ea p 3 O 'D 0 to J O
'U E
O
3 3 3 -c
0 0 0 _3 O oC
N
0 0 0 C
c c c o E
J 7 D .- O
0 0 O CJ al I)
U U U a. U a
Z
G
c � ai
O O O
y 0 0 0
x 2 2 2
332 s
o o 2 O a
J -J J J J
0 o a o 0 0 o a o a 0 0 0 0 o * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 `E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N
0 0 0 `P
O ri ID LID l0 0 IO O n n O O O l0 l0 lD 01 U3 r. O Q al ID n CO n r1 Q Q 03 Cr CO n n n O al O N-
I-
Q N H N r"1 rl r-1 Q N N n n Q es N .-4 ul r-1 n N N Vl al N r. N N CO V1 ul H U1 r-1 Q 'Cr •-/ Q 1J1 Q N
�•'� C1 CO CO 00 00 CO 00 C1 N N n n Cl co co co O co C0 CO N n n CO O in N m n n in IN in in V1 00 C) Co 01 N 1l CO n m M m M M 00 u1 VI m m 03 m m M M M Q N M m m n4 in N N N N N Q 00 M CO in
a
0
3
0
J
Vl ✓1 in in in ul V1ai O O in u1 in in ul V1 O in 0 ul u) u) u) in O 0 0 O in in O ul O 0 0 in u) in in 0
in Cl r-I r1 r-4 I-4 r-I ).Cl CO 00 IN N V) .--I r-1 .-. ul r-I n C1 n in in el Cl LO CO N u1 in ID ul lD 10 ID n u1 0 ul CO
N 00 In M Cn m m n al Cl r-I r-I n m m m V1 m N CO .-1 O O m N N Cl Q O O n O N O o N N N N C)
m en al men r-I r+ N N Cr) M CO N In N N N M r1 N •-I N N N N N rti rt --� •--I .-I
2
O
0
2
3
0
J
V) ul O o 0 o c• ul ul ul O o m 0 0 0 0 0 Ill ul 0 0 0 0 ul 0 ul 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vl In to In in
c [n lD l0 ID 1/40 l0 ID M 0 0 0 0 nt IO lD ID o l0 w O O u) ✓1 ID o Cn 0 0 in ul m M m r-I r. Q m o m o
C n IN 0 0 0 0 0 n Q Q Q Q n O 0 0 m O Q N. Q w 0 0 r-1 O Cr N IO O O VD O Q Q O n co N
N N N N N .-I rti rI .-I N N N el N .-+ N
LJ
ul 0 ul ul ul ul Vt In ul u1 0 0 in u1 in al 0 in in 0 0 in in al 0 ✓1 ul o ul al in m ul 0 0 in in in in u1
o IN 0 ID ID lD 1D tD n m en N N IN )D ID ID CO l0 N. 0 N in in lD Q C1 m O ul al Cl in Cl IN IN in n iD IN en
Qw n N N N N N ID O 0 03 CO ID N N N n N M n CO .-1 r1 N Ul l0 0 •-I r• r-i 40 r+ w N N 00 to Q l0 O
r-1 .-I .-i .--1 r-1 r+ r-1 N .-I r-1 .-I
2
3
0
3 ul Ul In 01 u) ul in in
0 0 LEI ill n u u C' ul 0 to m m ul v) o u) o o m in LEI m 0 0 0 m0 in 0
u) r. 00 CO CO CO CO 00 inm a) in CO 00 Co W 01 00 CO r--1 IJl n n CO ID con CO 00 in n n CO Cl Cl C- ul O u) ul
O m m n n n N. N. al lal0 ID l0 ul n n n Q n m in n m N •D N N IN cc) N ul l0
r-1 r-1 r-1 .ti .ti r-I rl N N r-1 •-1 - e-I N .-I rl N N --r r-r .y M N .--I rr r-I .-1 N r-I N .--• rr r1 r-I r-1 � r-I
O ul rI r+ r. r. '-I 0 0 0 .-• r+ 0 ti r-I r. Ni r-1 in in rI 0 0 r-I Ni m 0 10 0 0 CO 0 CO CO 00 0 0 m 00
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r-I r-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r. O O O O 0 o O 0 0 0 et 0 r.
ID n in u) ul ul ul CO O O ul ul lD ul ul ul ul in n n in 00 00 in r. r. O O OO CO r. 03 r. 01 01 1/40 ID O ID O
O O N N N N N O N N N N 0 N N Ni N N O 0 N .-1 .-I N N N N N .-1 r. N rti N r1 r. •-1 o N O
0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C) 0 0
m m m m m en m in m M M m m fn m m fri m m m m al m m m m fn m m m m en m m m In m m m m
N N N N N N N Ni N N N N N N N N Ni Ni N N N N N N N N N N N rJ N N N nJ N N /V N N N
Q r-1 •-1 rti r-I .-1 r-1 .-I .-1 ri .-I r1 .-1 .-1 r-I .-I .-1 r1 r-1 .-I .-1 .-1 ,--1 - r-I .-1 .-1 r-i r-I r-1 r4 r-1 r1 r-I rH r-I .-I rl .-1 ry r-I
U 0 00 CO 00 00 00 00 00 00 CO 00 00 00 CO 00 00 CO CO 00 C0 CO CO CO 00 00 CO 00 CO 00 CO CO CO 00 00 CO 00 00 CO CO 00
U O Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O V1 In in N to N Vl N in to in in ul Vl V) N Vl V1 V1 to VI ul U in in in in V N N u/ in in in l l V1 in vi V1 u) VI
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 0 7 0 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
m O O O O O O O 0 O o O O O O O O O o O O O O O O O O o O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C1 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
cc 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
C0
0000000 0 O O O O O O O 000000 000 000 0000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ol ul - Ul Vl to ut u1 al u) ul in in al in in id) ul V) IJl ul ul al ul u1 in al al al u) Ul m in in u) u1 in in u) in inU r1 r-1 r-I r4 el r-1 ti rl N r-I r1 N N rl rti r1 r1 N N r1 N .-I r-1 ri r-i rH ri N r1 r1 el N .--I r-I r1 r-I r-I N r1 N
rl N m Q u) •--I .--1 .--I --1 r1 .-. r-1 N (Ti .-1 N •--I N r-• .-+ N •-+ .--I N M Q r-1 N (Ti 'Cr -I .--I rI --I .-1 .--I
C
O
a
V
O
J
3 r-I (Ti Q Q Q Q Q in ID IN .CC '0) 0 r1 .. ra N N u1 in ID 03 CO C) r+ y 1-I m M m m •7 en Q u W N. CO
•-r ti •-. .-I - I N r1 -+ r1 rl (V N N N N N N N N en m m m M en en
0_
C < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < <
m 2222222222222222222222222222222222222222
m w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w
Q LL LL LL U- LL LL LL U- LL LL LL u- LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL u- LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL
CO o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 C0 Q
00 Vl Q C1 N N C) It) n in N N Q en o rl in n en m N in r-I en lD r-I lb 0 in Cl m 0 CI (71 03 C1 d u1 03 rI
r-• ul rI N Q Q ul m 00 l0 Q Q al V) N N u) lD m 0 Q 0 CO C) C1 r! O n Q La ra rI Cl ul n n Ill N •-1 ID
d r. Cl m N 01 01 CO 10 00 CO m m ID N Q m N C) 00 O en m N n 00 M C) CO n ID CO N r-I Q CO ri l0 in re Q
'B in O r1 r1 0 0 o 'Cr In M CO 03 Q 00 CO CO 'Cr Q O .'. CO m m O N (7) O el u) ul in in CT Dl ry O Q n V) C)
3 Q Q m m m m m yr. el ri n n Q M m M m m 'Cr Q N. N N M m N r1 o N N N N N 0 0 0 Q r-. Q O
'-, O O o o O O O O O O O o o o o O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O o
Cr Q Cr Cr Cr Cr o Cr Cr Cr Cr Q 'Cr Cr r} Q Q Cr Cr Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q 'Cr Q Q n n n v Q Q Q Q
J
Q o 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 0 0 0 0 o Q
CO 00 0 ul o 0 Cl ID CO m 01 Cl N n in N m co CO Cl Cl IN 0 N re 0 Ill N In Ul ul n Q Q m Cl N Q CO In
co -. 00 00 al Cl n Q Q Q ul In m 00 W 07 0 03 CO N Ifl 0 0 00 N C1 01 00 N in In N n 00 ti 1.0 Cl 0 op r.4
y n 0 Q Q Q Q Q r. 0 0 r. r-I .-I CO 00 CO In (Ti m 0 r-I CO r-I Q C) N. ID Q C) Cl 0 00 ID CO ID m rI 01 N N
-O C) in Q Q Q Q Q O o N o 0 0 00 00 CO re r1 rI N o as 01 Q CO r1 m O IN. n CO N m Q co ID O N Cl ul
10 CO N N N N N n O O CO 00 n Q Q Q Q Q ID l0 CO 00 CO N CO O O 01 00 C0 00 00 O CO 00 VI n Ql ID O
Q 0 07 4 4 0 0 0 In is; 0 0 0 0 Q 0 o o o o o Q Q o a u) o Q Q Q Q 0 ul 0 Q O 0 Q Q in
m o 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N 1-4 rl N r-1 ri r+ r-I r1 r1 N r1 rl r1 r. N rl rl r. r-I N r-1 r-I r'-1 N N r-I r1 N r1 r-I r-1 r-. r1 N r-1 N H H r.
0 ,
J
ai'.
Ry • Ty d1 `N
A .r ' `- I .441 a V . . , R
r fl t q �_ .. ii t no- ^80
j�_1
' L . —I >21 0l Pl �1 • .
Oll .•� a
;sri Y' •Q 1 'a • A
n �
U. LL U. DJ
11
raly
All
le :M
. .
. .. r - ...... „... _
ID
U.W LL Vrlrj r
i ad 1i s
l k
7 {
,i. T
S ell O el
npl '1 r1 ai
1 t mlrf ,
� S
U. LL LL Il l W ,
LL
LL LL ;1 •
a .40:
��° . • 1 tt
-� - . . T < ��; = .-_ . . '•yam it
fir
.
'
U.
at it, . # i .... < < 1 _ 0,- j . i
1.
0 4,11
-O = w q
1L IL 1h �a '� r ' f • J
Es)
1 O 4 \ 4
t A It
Arkl, `�
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page I of 22
t-
► P. .-08:CG . i 45-I N- 0712(0)
App icant Name: Application Title:
WELD (COUNTY) WELCO19 - BRIDGE 87.0/42.5B
Period of Performance Start: Period of Performance End:
09-14-2013
Subgrant Application - Entire Application
Application Title: WELCO19 - BRIDGE 87.0142.5B
Application Number: PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00712(0)
Application Type: Subgrant Application (PW)
Preparer Information
Prefix Mr.
First Name STEPHEN
Middle Initial
Last Name SUHY
Title PROJECT SPECIALIST
Agency/Organization Name FEMA - DHS
Address 1 9200 E. MINERAL AVE.
Address 2
City CENTENNIAL
State CO
Zip 80112
Email deanna.butterbaugh@state.co. us
Is the application preparer the Point of Contact? No
Point of Contact Information
Prefix Mr.
First Name Roy
Middle Initial
Last Name Rudisill
Title Director - OEM
Agency/Organization Weld County
Address 1 1150 O Street
Address 2
City Greeley
State CO
ZIP 80632
https://connect l .dhs.gov/emm ie/.Danalnto=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?. . . 5/7/20 14
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 2 of 22
Phone 970-304-6540
Fax
Email rrudisill@weldgov. com
Alternate Point of Contact Information
Prefix Mr.
First Name Trevor
Middle Initial
Last Name Jinicek
Title Director
Agency/Organization Weld County
Address 1 1150 O Street
Address 2
City Greeley
State CO
ZIP 80632
Phone 970-356-4000
Fax
Email tjinicek@weldgov.com
Project Description
Disaster Number: 4145
Pre-Application Number: PA-08-CO-4145-RPA-0088
Applicant ID: 123-99123-00
Applicant Name: WELD (COUNTY)
Subdivision:
Project Number: WELCO19
Standard Project Number/Title: 304 - Bituminous Surface and Embankment Failure
Please Indicate the Project Type: Neither Alternate nor Improved
Application Title: WELCO19 - BRIDGE 87. 0/42.5B
Category: C. ROADS & BRIDGES
Percentage Work Completed? 75. 0 %
As of Date: 01 -04-2014
Comments
Attachments
Damage Facilities (Part 1 of 2)
Facility Site
Number Facility Name Address County City State ZIP Previously Action
Damaged?
1 BRIDGE 87.0/42. 5B CR87 AT PLATTE RIVER Weld CO No
https://connectl .dhs.gov/emm ie/,DanaInfo=isource.tema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 5/7/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 3 of 22
Comments
Attachments
User Date Document Type Description Hard Copy File Reference File Name Action
STEPHEN 02-22- Photos PHOTOS 1 4145-WELCO19-WELD PHOTOS 1 .docx View
SUHY 2014 COUNTY-PHOTOS 1 (6.76 Mb)
STEPHEN 02-22- LOCATION 4145-WELCO19-WELD MAP.pdf(158. 04
SUHY 2014 Map MAP COUNTY-LOCATION MAP kb) View
Facility Name: BRIDGE 87. 0/42. 5B
Address 1 : CR87 AT PLATTE RIVER
Address 2:
County: Weld
City:
State: CO
ZIP:
Was this site previously damaged? No
Percentage Work Completed? 75. 00 %
PA-08-C O-4145-P W-00712(0):
CR87 AT PLATTE RIVER
Location:
PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00712(0):
CR 87. 0/42.5B Canal Bridge (Canal parallel to South Platte River).
Category C, Permanent Bridge Repair
Lat: N40. 30793
Long: — W104.24482
During the incident period of September 11 . 2013 to September 30.
2013. Weld County. Colorado received heavy rainfall and debris in the
creeks, streams and rivers which caused damage to numerous roads
and bridges in Weld County. This project worksheet addresses damages
Damage Description and to bridge WEL87.0/42. 5B Canal Bridge. (Canal parallel to South Platte
River. )
Dimensions:
On November 19. 2013, Kathleen Ruvarac. FEMA TAC Bridge
Specialist. David Ray. FEMA Hazard Mitigation Specialist. and Donald
Dunker. Weld County Public Works Engineer, performed a site
investigation at this location to document damages. The bridge was
open and repairs were substantially completed at the time of inspection.
The 60 ft long x 30 ft wide concrete and steel structure traverses a canal
of the South Platte River in Weld County. CO. The bridge is a steel
beam with a 4 inch asphalt overlay on corrugated steel deck. six (6) — 24
inch steel girders. concrete abutments and wing walls. The deck is
flanked on both sides with a galvanized W rail beam on 6 inch x 4 inch
https://connect 1 .dhs.gov/emm ic/ Danainfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatch Destination .do?.. . 5/7/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 4 of 22
steel posts welded to the exterior girders.
The damages to the facility include the following:
1 . North Approach washout. 30 FT X 20 FT X 12 FT = 7,200 CF /27 =
266.67 CY
2 . South Approach washout. 25 FT X 25 FT X 12 FT = 7. 500 CF /27 =
277.78 CY
3 . East embankment washout. 220 FT X 13 FT X 4 FT = 11 .440 CF /27
= 423.70 CY
4 . Rip Rap 18IN washed away. 240 FT X 12 FT X 2 FT = 5.760 CF /27
= 213. 33 CY
5 . Rip Rap 6IN washed away. 25 FT X 8 FT X 2 FT = 400 CF /27 =
14. 81 CY
6 . Bridge deck and approaches asphalt destroyed. 105 FT X 30 FT X
0. 33 FT = 1 . 040 CF X 130LB/CF = 135.200 LB.
TOTAL WASHOUT = 968. 15CY. 181N RIP RAP = 213.33CY, 61N RIP
RAP = 14. 81 CY. Asphalt = 135.200LB.
PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00712(0):
WORK COMPLETED
1 . North Approach washout. T200 CF /27 = 266.67 CY X 1 . 82 = 485.33
TONS X $33.70 = $ 16.355.73. 304-06000 CDOT.
2 . South Approach washout. 7. 500 CF /27 = 277.78 CY X 1 .82 = 505. 56
TONS X $33.70 = $17. 037.22. 304-06000 CDOT.
3 . East embankment washout. 11 .440 CF /27 = 423.70 CY X 1 .82 =
771 . 14 TONS X $33.70 = $25.987.44. 304-06000 CDOT.
4 . Rip Rap 18IN washed away. 5.760 CF /27 = 213. 33 CY X $83. 17 =
$17,742.93. 506-00218 CDOT.
5 . Rip Rap 61N washed away. 400 CF /27 = 14.81 CY X $94.78 =
$1 ,404. 15. 506-00206 CDOT.
TOTAL = $78. 527.48.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED
6 . Bridge deck and approaches asphalt destroyed. 135.200 LB '/2000
Scope of Work: = 67.60 TONS X $81 .70 = $5, 522.92. 403-33741 CDOT.
TOTAL = $5.522. 92.
Project Notes:
1 . During repair or reconstruction, applicant may incur additional costs
related to clearing and grubbing. placement of topsoil, erosion and
sedimentation control. sanitary facilities. dewatering. mobilization and
flagging/traffic control. Such costs are generally addressed in the "in-
place" unit costs of repair or reconstruction items. and not specifically
addressed in the Scope of Work. However, if a project requires an
extraordinary use of any such items, to where a specific reference in the
PW should be considered. applicant is advised to contract Colorado
Department of Emergency Management requesting a revision to the
PW's Scope of Work.
2. The applicant has not provided previous bridge inspection reports for
this facility. Applicant has completed a substantial percentage of the work
but will not have cost data or supporting documents available within the
fourteen day Pocket Guide rule. Per Field Operations Pocket Guide.
https://connectl .dhs.gov/emm iel.Danalnfo=isource.tema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?.. . 5/7/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 5 of 22
Section 7, Cost Estimates, Page 26. "If the applicant has not produced
cost data within two weeks of the site inspection , the Project Specialist
will prepare the PW on the basis of an estimate for the work
accomplished".
3. The deck originally had an asphalt top coat that was destroyed by
the storm. The Applicant covered the deck with gravel as an initial repair
and may choose in the future to cover the deck with asphalt.
4. Following the September 2013 flooding. applicant used contract
services and/or force account resources to re-open roads/bridges and
repair damage as soon as possible. At several damage sites, repairs
appear to have returned the facility to its pre-disaster design. function
and capacity with no known remaining work to be completed. However
at other sites due to the onset of winter conditions. applicant was unable
to complete the restoration, thus leaving work to be completed. Finally,
at some sites. applicant has expressed concern that unanticipated work
may be still be required as a result of conditions beyond their control.
such as possible subsequent settlement resulting from saturated soil
conditions following the flood or where high water levels or
erosion/deposition prevented a complete damage assessment.
5. This PW addresses all validated flood related damages at the
specified site. including completed work and work to be completed (which
damages were known to the applicant and reported to FEMA by the
effective date of this PW) In the event that applicant identifies
subsequent, currently unknown flood related damage at such site.
applicant is advised to contact the State of Colorado Office of Emergency
Management to report the damage and request an inspection prior to its
repair. In the event that the State validates the damage as a direct result
of the September 2013 flooding. the State will request FEMA prepare a
version of this PW to address the eligible cost of repair.
6. Applicant has completed a substantial percentage of the work but
will not have cost data available within the fourteen day Pocket Guide
rule. Per Field Operations Pocket Guide. Section 7. Cost Estimates.
Page 26, " If the applicant has not produced cost data within two weeks of
the site inspection. the Project Specialist will prepare the PW on the
basis of an estimate for the work accomplished". Applicant. CO State
representative and FEMA personnel jointly conducted all inspections and
agreed to use CDOT costs for in-place costs to derive estimates on this
project worksheet. Applicant understands that all actual support
documentation . invoices. FA records. contract and proof of payment will
be required for final reconciliation and or closeout process. Attached is
the CDOT average in-place cost for materials.
7. The Applicant will notify FEMA and the State of their intent to
perform permanent work related to this site before any work commences
in the field . Failure to do so may jeopardize the sub-grant for permanent
work related to the work in this sub-grant.
8. Pursuant to 44 CFR 13.42. Grantees and Subgrantees are required
to retain records, including source documentation. to support
expenditures/costs incurred against the grant award. for 3 years from the
date of submission to FEMA of the final Financial Status Report.
9. The applicant must obtain all required federal. state. and local
permits prior to the commencement of work.
10. The subgrantee is requesting direct administrative costs that are
directly chargeable to this specific project. Associated eligible work is
related to administration of the PA project only and in accordance with 44
CFR 13.22. These costs are treated consistently and uniformly as direct
costs in all federal awards and other subgrantee activities and are not
included in any approved indirect costs. The direct administrative cost is
this PW is an estimate because complete cost data was not available.
11 . At the time this PW was written the full extent of possible 406
Hazard Mitigation opportunities was not identified. Applicant may submit
https://connectI .dhs.gov/emmie/,DanaInfo=isource.tema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do''. . . 5 /7:20 I 4
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 6 of 22
HMP after a review by their consulting engineers.
12. The applicant is aware that all projects are subject to an insurance
review as stated in 44 C.F. R. Sections 206.252 and 206.253. If
applicable. an insurance determination will be made either as anticipated
proceeds or actual proceeds in accordance with the applicant's insurance
policy that may affect the total amount of the project.
13. The applicant is required to adhere to State and Federal
Government Procurement rules and regulations and maintain adequate
records to support the basis for all purchasing of goods and materials
and contracting services for projects approved under the Public
Assistance program. as stated in 44 CFR 13. 36. The applicant has
advised they have followed their normal procurement procedures.
Hazard Mitigation Proposal
Is effective mitigation feasible on this site? No
If you answered Yes to the above question, the next question is required
Will mitigation be performed on this site? No
If you answered Yes to the above question, the next question is required
Do you wish to attach a Hazard Mitigation No
Proposal?
If you answered Yes to the above question, the next two questions are required
Please provide the Scope of Work for the
estimate:
(maximum 4000 characters)
Would you like to add the Hazard Mitigation No
Proposal as a cost line item to the project cost?
GIS Coordinates
Project Location Latitude Longitude
CR87 AT PLATTE RIVER 40. 30793 -104.24482
Special Considerations
1 . Does the damaged facility or item of work have insurance coverage and/or is it an insurable No
risk (e.g. . buildings. equipment. vehicles. etc)?
2. Is the damaged facility located within a floodplain or coastal high hazard area and/or does it No
have an impact on a floodplain or wetland?
If you would like to make any comments, please enter them below.
(maximum 4000 characters)
FLOOD MAP 080266 0637. PANEL 825.
3. Is the damaged facility or item of work located within or adjacent to a Coastal Barrier No
Resource System Unit or an Otherwise Protected Area?
4. Will the proposed facility repairs/reconstruction change the pre-disaster conditions (e. g. . No
footprint, material, location. capacity, use of function)?
5. Does the applicant have a hazard mitigation proposal or would the applicant like technical No
assistance for a hazard mitigation proposal?
6. Is the damaged facility on the National Register of Historic Places or the state historic No
listing? Is it older than 50 years? Are there more, similar buildings near the site?
7. Are there any pristine or undisturbed areas on , or near, the project site? Are there large No
tracts of forestland?
https://connect I .dhs.gov/emm ie/,DanaInfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatch Destination.do?... 5/7/20 14
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 7 of 22
8. Are there any hazardous materials at or adjacent to the damaged facility and/or item of No
work?
9. Are there any other environmental or controversial issues associated with the damaged No
facility and/or item of work?
Attachments
User Date Document Type Description Hard Copy File Reference File Name Action
STEPHEN 02-22- Map FIRMETTE 4145-WELCO19-WELD FIRMETTE. pdf View
SUHY 2014 COUNTY-FIRMETTE (866.81 kb)
For Category C, D, E, F, and G Projects only
Is effective mitigation feasible on this project? Yes
If you answered Yes to the above question, the next question is required
Will mitigation be performed on any sites in this No
project?
If you answered Yes to the above question. the next question is required
Do you wish to attach a Hazard Mitigation No
Proposal?
If you answered Yes to the above question, the next two questions are required
Please provide the Scope of Work
for the estimate:
Would you like to add the Hazard Mitigation No
Proposal as a cost line item to the project cost?
Comments
Attachments
Cost Estimate
Is this Project Worksheet for
(Preferred) Repair
Material and/or Unit Unit of Subgrant Cost
Sequence Code Description Quantity Measure Unit Price Budget Type Estimate Action
Class
*'t't Version 0 ***
Work Completed
1 9999 ESTIMATE 1 LS $ Work
78,527.48 Completed $ 78. 527.48
Work To Be Completed
Work To
2 9999 ESTIMATE 1 LS 5. 522. 92 Be $ 5, 522.92
Completed
Direct Grantee Admin Cost
Direct Direct
Administrative $ INDIRECT Grantee
https://connectl .dhs.gov/em iii ie/,Danaln fo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination .do?. . . 5/7/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 8 of 22
3 990 .. Costs LS 1 .000.00 CHARGES Admin
1
(Subgrantee) Cost $ 1 . 000.00
Total Cost : $ 85,050.40
Insurance Adjustments (Deductibles. Proceeds and Settlements) - 5900/5901
Subgrant
Se quence Code Material and/or Unit Unit of Unit Cost
Description Quantity Measure Price Budget Type Estimate Action
Class
Total Cost : $ 0.00
Total Cost Estimate: $ 85,050.40
(Preferred Estimate Type + Insurance Adjustments) '
Comments
Attachments
User Date Document Description Hard Copy File File Name Action
Type Reference
STEPHEN 22- Calculation ,gdmDirect
strative 4145-WELCO19-WELD DAC SHEET.pdf(7. 84
SUHY 2014 Sheet Cost COUNTY-DAC PAGE kb)
02- 4245-WELCO19-WELD CALCULATION
STEPHEN O4_ Calculation CALCULATION COUNTY- SPREADSHEET.pdf \ ' -
SUHY 2014 Sheet SPREADSHEET CALCULATION (77.42 kb)
SPREADSHEET
Existing Insurance Information
Insurance Type Policy No. Bldg/Property Content Insurance Deductible Years
Amount Amount Amount Amount Required
Comments
Attachments
Comments and Attachments
Name of Section Comment Attachment
PHOTOS 1 .docx
Damage Facilities MAP.pdf
Special Considerations FIRMETTE.pdf
Cost Estimate DAC SHEET.pdf
CALCULATION SPREADSHEET.pdf
WELCO19 DDD SOW .docx
Form 90-91 PW FRONT PAGE.pdf
WELCO19 - Signed PW.pdf
Bundle Reference # (Amendment #) Date Awarded
PA-08-CO-4145-State-0043(42) 04-14-2014
https://connect / .dhs.gov/em m ie/,Danalnfo=isource.tema.net.SSL+dispatch Destination.do?... 5/7/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 9 of 22
Subgrant Application - FEMA Form 90-91
Note: The Effective Cost Share for this application is 75%
FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
PROJECT WORKSHEET
DISASTER PROJECT NO. PA ID NO. DATE CATEGORY
WELCO19 123-99123- 02-22-2014 C
FEMA 4145 - DR -CO 00
APPLICANT: WELD (COUNTY) WORK COMPLETE AS OF:
01 -04-2014 : 75
Site 1 of 1
DAMAGED FACILITY:
COUNTY: Weld
BRIDGE 87.0/42.5B
LOCATION: LATITUDE: LONGITUDE:
40.30793 -104.24482
PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00712(0):
CR87 AT PLATTE RIVER
DAMAGE DESCRIPTION AND DIMENSIONS:
PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00712(0):
CR 87.0/42.5B Canal Bridge (Canal parallel to South Platte River). Category C. Permanent Bridge Repair
Lat: N40.30793
Long: — W104.24482
During the incident period of September 11 . 2013 to September 30. 2013, Weld County. Colorado received heavy rainfall and debris in the
creeks. streams and rivers which caused damage to numerous roads and bridges in Weld County. This project worksheet addresses
damages to bridge WEL87.0/42.5B Canal Bridge. (Canal parallel to South Platte River.)
On November 19, 2013, Kathleen Ruvarac. FEMA TAC Bridge Specialist, David Ray. FEMA Hazard Mitigation Specialist. and Donald
Dunker. Weld County Public Works Engineer, performed a site investigation at this location to document damages. The bridge was open
and repairs were substantially completed at the time of inspection.
The 60 ft long x 30 ft wide concrete and steel structure traverses a canal of the South Platte River in Weld County. CO. The bridge is a
steel beam with a 4 inch asphalt overlay on corrugated steel deck. six (6) - 24 inch steel girders. concrete abutments and wing walls. The
deck is flanked on both sides with a galvanized W rail beam on 6 inch x 4 inch steel posts welded to the exterior girders.
The damages to the facility include the following:
1 . North Approach washout. 30 FT X 20 FT X 12 FT = 7.200 CF /27 = 266.67 CY
2 . South Approach washout. 25 FT X 25 FT X 12 FT = 7,500 CF /27 = 277.78 CY
3 . East embankment washout. 220 FT X 13 FT X 4 FT = 11 .440 CF /27 = 423.70 CY
4 . Rip Rap 181N washed away. 240 FT X 12 FT X 2 FT = 5,760 CF /27 = 213.33 CY
5 . Rip Rap 61N washed away. 25 FT X 8 FT X 2 FT = 400 CF /27 = 14.81 CY
6 . Bridge deck and approaches asphalt destroyed. 105 FT X 30 FT X 0.33 FT = 1 .040 CF X 130LB/CF = 135.200 LB.
TOTAL WASHOUT = 968.15CY, 18IN RIP RAP = 213.33CY. 61N RIP RAP = 14.81CY. Asphalt = 135.200LB.
SCOPE OF WORK:
PA-08-CO-4145-P W-00712(0):
WORK COMPLETED
https://connect I .dhs.gov/emm ie/,Dana I n fo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatch Destination .do?. . . 5/7/20 14
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page I 0 of 22
1 . North Approach washout. 7,200 CF /27 = 266.67 CY X 1 .82 = 485.33 TONS X $33.70 = $16,355.73. 304-06000 CDOT.
2 . South Approach washout. 7,500 CF /27 = 277.78 CY X 1 .82 = 505.56 TONS X $33.70 = $17,037.22. 304-06000 CDOT.
3 . East embankment washout. 11 ,440 CF /27 = 423.70 CY X 1 .82 = 771 .14 TONS X $33.70 = $25,987.44. 304-06000 CDOT.
4 . Rip Rap 18IN washed away. 5.760 CF /27 = 213.33 CY X $83.17 = $17.742.93. 506-00218 CDOT.
5 . Rip Rap 6IN washed away. 400 CF /27 = 14.81 CY X $94.78 = $1 ,404.15. 506-00206 CDOT.
TOTAL = $78,527.48.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED
6 . Bridge deck and approaches asphalt destroyed. 135.200 LB '/2000 = 67.60 TONS X $81 .70 = $5,522.92. 403-33741 CDOT.
TOTAL = $5,522.92.
Project Notes:
1 . During repair or reconstruction. applicant may incur additional costs related to clearing and grubbing. placement of topsoil. erosion and
sedimentation control. sanitary facilities, dewatering. mobilization and flagging/traffic control. Such costs are generally addressed in the "in-
place" unit costs of repair or reconstruction items. and not specifically addressed in the Scope of Work. However, if a project requires an
extraordinary use of any such items. to where a specific reference in the PW should be considered. applicant is advised to contract
Colorado Department of Emergency Management requesting a revision to the PW's Scope of Work.
2. The applicant has not provided previous bridge inspection reports for this facility. Applicant has completed a substantial percentage of
the work but will not have cost data or supporting documents available within the fourteen day Pocket Guide rule. Per Field Operations
Pocket Guide, Section 7, Cost Estimates. Page 26, "If the applicant has not produced cost data within two weeks of the site inspection, the
Project Specialist will prepare the PW on the basis of an estimate for the work accomplished".
3. The deck originally had an asphalt top coat that was destroyed by the storm. The Applicant covered the deck with gravel as an initial
repair and may choose in the future to cover the deck with asphalt.
4. Following the September 2013 flooding, applicant used contract services and/or force account resources to re-open roads/bridges and
repair damage as soon as possible. At several damage sites. repairs appear to have returned the facility to its pre-disaster design. function
and capacity with no known remaining work to be completed. However at other sites due to the onset of winter conditions. applicant was
unable to complete the restoration, thus leaving work to be completed. Finally. at some sites, applicant has expressed concern that
unanticipated work may be still be required as a result of conditions beyond their control, such as possible subsequent settlement resulting
from saturated soil conditions following the flood or where high water levels or erosion/deposition prevented a complete damage
assessment.
5. This PW addresses all validated flood related damages at the specified site. including completed work and work to be completed (which
damages were known to the applicant and reported to FEMA by the effective date of this PW). In the event that applicant identifies
subsequent, currently unknown flood related damage at such site. applicant is advised to contact the State of Colorado Office of Emergency
Management to report the damage and request an inspection prior to its repair. In the event that the State validates the damage as a direct
result of the September 2013 flooding, the State will request FEMA prepare a version of this PW to address the eligible cost of repair.
6. Applicant has completed a substantial percentage of the work but will not have cost data available within the fourteen day Pocket Guide
rule. Per Field Operations Pocket Guide. Section 7, Cost Estimates. Page 26, "If the applicant has not produced cost data within two weeks
of the site inspection, the Project Specialist will prepare the PW on the basis of an estimate for the work accomplished". Applicant. CO State
representative and FEMA personnel jointly conducted all inspections and agreed to use CDOT costs for in-place costs to derive estimates
on this project worksheet. Applicant understands that all actual support documentation. invoices. FA records. contract and proof of payment
will be required for final reconciliation and or closeout process. Attached is the CDOT average in-place cost for materials.
7. The Applicant will notify FEMA and the State of their intent to perform permanent work related to this site before any work commences
in the field. Failure to do so may jeopardize the sub-grant for permanent work related to the work in this sub-grant.
8. Pursuant to 44 CFR 13.42. Grantees and Subgrantees are required to retain records, including source documentation. to support
expenditures/costs incurred against the grant award. for 3 years from the date of submission to FEMA of the final Financial Status Report.
9. The applicant must obtain all required federal. state. and local permits prior to the commencement of work.
10. The subgrantee is requesting direct administrative costs that are directly chargeable to this specific project. Associated eligible work is
related to administration of the PA project only and in accordance with 44 CFR 13.22. These costs are treated consistently and uniformly as
direct costs in all federal awards and other subgrantee activities and are not included in any approved indirect costs. The direct
administrative cost is this PW is an estimate because complete cost data was not available.
11 . At the time this PO./ was written the full extent of possible 406 Hazard Mitigation opportunities was not identified. Applicant may submit
HMP after a review by their consulting engineers.
12. The applicant is aware that all projects are subject to an insurance review as stated in 44 C.F.R. Sections 206.252 and 206.253. If
applicable. an insurance determination will be made either as anticipated proceeds or actual proceeds in accordance with the applicant's
insurance policy that may affect the total amount of the project.
13. The applicant is required to adhere to State and Federal Government Procurement rules and regulations and maintain adequate
records to support the basis for all purchasing of goods and materials and contracting services for projects approved under the Public
Assistance program. as stated in 44 CFR 13.36. The applicant has advised they have followed their normal procurement procedures.
Does the Scope of Work change the pre-disaster
conditions at the site? Yes No Special Considerations included? Yes No
Hazard Mitigation proposal included? Yes
Is there insurance coverage on this facility? Yes No
No
PROJECT COST
ITEM CODE NARRATIVE QUANTITY/UNIT UNIT PRICE COST
*** Version 0 ***
https://connectl .dhs.gov/emm le/Danalnth=isourcelema.net.SSL+dispatchDestination .do?.. . 5/7/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 11 of 22
Work Completed
1 9999 ESTIMATE 1 /LS $ 78, 527.48 $ 78.527.48
Work To Be Completed
2 9999 ESTIMATE 1 /LS $ 5. 522. 92 $ 5, 522.92
Direct Grantee Admin Cost
3 9901 Direct Administrative Costs 1 /LS $ 1 . 000.00 $ 1 . 000. 00
(Subgrantee)
TOTAL COST $ 85.050.40
PREPARED BY STEPHEN SUHY TITLE PROJECT SPECIALIST SIGNATURE
APPLICANT REP. Roy Rudisill TITLE Director - OEM SIGNATURE
WELD (COUNTY) : PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00712
Conditions Information
Review Name Condition Type Condition Name Description Monitored Status
This review does not address
all federal.. state and local
requirements. Acceptance of
federal funding requires
Standard recipient to comply with all
Final Review Other (EHP) Condition #2 federal. state and local laws. No Approved
Failure to obtain all appropriate
federal, state and local
environmental permits and
clearances may jeopardize
federal funding.
Any change to the approved
Standard scope of work will require re-
Final Review Other (EHP) Condition #1 evaluation for compliance with No Approved
NEPA and other Laws and
Executive Orders.
Gravel/borrow materials for
work to be completed must be
National Historic obtained from one of the
following pre-approved
Final Review Other (EHP) Preservation Act No Approved
(NHPA) sources: (SHPO approved
source. CO Licensed Pit.
commercial source. contractor
or county Stockpiles).
Applicant is responsible for
Executive Order coordinating with the local
Final Review Other (EHP) 11988 - floodplain manager. All No Approved
Floodplains required permits should be
maintained as part of the
permanent record
State Hazardous Debris must be appropriately
Final Review Other (EHP) Materials and separated and disposed of in No Approved
Solid Waste an approved disposal site or
Laws landfill.
If ground disturbing activities
https://connect I .dhs.gov/emm let Dana I nfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 5/7/20 14
7f±. _ -t
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 12 of 22
occur during construction.
applicant will monitor ground
disturbance and if any potential
Final Review Other (EHP) Standard archeological resources are No Approved
Condition #3 discovered. will immediately
cease construction in that area
and notify the State and
FEMA.
1 . Design the project to avoid
and minimize the permanent
and temporary impacts to
riparian and adjacent upland
habitats. a. Before
construction. identify and
prioritize riparian and adjacent
upland habitats within the
project area. Design the
project so that it avoids these
habitats whenever possible. b.
Minimize the amount of
concrete. riprap. bridge
footings, and other "hard, -
impermeable engineering
features within the stream
channel and riparian or
adjacent upland habitats. c.
Use bioengineering techniques
to stabilize stream banks. d.
Minimize the number and
footprint of access routes.
staging areas. and work areas.
e. Locate access routes.
Endangered staging areas, and work areas
Final Review Other (EHP) Species Act within previously disturbed or No Approved
(ESA) modified non-habitat areas. f.
Maintain habitat connectivity
under bridges or through
culverts by installing ledges or
dry culverts adjacent to the
culverts with water flow. g.
Avoid fragmenting linear
riparian corridors. 2. Install
limits of work fencing (e.g. .
orange barrier netting or silt
fencing). signage, or other
visible markers to delineate
access routes and the project
area from habitats. Use this
fencing to enforce no-entry
zones. 3. Hold a
preconstruction briefing for
onsite personnel to explain the
limits of work and other
conservation measures. 4.
Follow regional stormwater
guidelines and design best
management practices (BMPs)
to control contamination .
erosion . and sedimentation.
such as silt fences. silt basins.
littps://connectl .dhs.gov/emm ie/, Danaln for-isourcefema.net,SSL+dispatch Destination.do?... 5/7/2014
Tr-
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 13 of 22
gravel bags. and other controls
needed to stabilize soils in
denuded or graded areas,
during and after construction.
5. Locate utilities along existing
road corridors, and if possible.
within the roadway or road
shoulder. a. Bury overhead
utilities whenever possible. b.
Directionally bore utilities and
pipes underneath habitats. 6.
Develop and implement a
habitat restoration plan that
addresses site preparation.
planting techniques, control of
non-native weeds. native seed
mixtures. and post-
construction monitoring.
17. Upon project completion.
revegetate all disturbed areas
with native shrubs. trees. and
grasses. a. Rip compacted
access routes prior to
replanting with native
vegetation. b. Fill and reseed
with weed free material and
native seed mixtures. c.
Consult the Service before
Endangered finalizing a seed and plant list.
Final Review Other (EHP) Species Act 18. Bury riprap. then plant with No Approved
(ESA) native riparian vegetation. 19.
Rehabilitate adjacent habitats
impacted by floodwaters to
restore connectivity and
prevent future impacts from
erosion or sedimentation. 20.
Consider monitoring the
revegetated areas for success.
The Service can help establish
success criteria during the
consultation process.
7. Contact the Service
immediately by telephone at
(303) 236-4773 if a Preble's is
found alive. dead.. injured. or
hibernating within the project
area. Please also contact the
Service if any other listed
species are found within the
project area. 8. To the
maximum extent practicable,
limit disturbing (e.g. . crushing.
trampling) or removing (e.g. ,
cutting. clearing) all vegetation ,
such as willows. trees. shrubs.
and grasses within riparian and
adjacent upland habitats. a.
Restrict the temporary or
permanent removal of
https://connect I .dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.tema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination .do?... 5/7/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 14 of 22
vegetation to the footprint of
the project area. b. Minimize
the use of heavy machinery
and use smaller equipment
when possible. c. Soil
compaction: Temporarily line
access routes with geotextiles
or other materials. especially in
wet. unstable soils to protect
roots and the seed bank. 9.
Use the attached table to track
the acres or square feet of
riparian and upland habitats
temporarily or permanently
affected by the response
activities. a. Temporary
Impacts: Native vegetation and
habitats will reestablish
following rehabilitation (e.g. .
access route that is
rehabilitated with native. weed-
free seeds and plants). b.
Permanent Impacts: Riparian
or upland habitats will not
return as a result of project
activities (e.g. . road surface,
concrete footings) 10. Track
the volumes of any water from
Endangered onsite sources stored or used
Final Review Other (EHP) Species Act for dust abatement. soil No Approved
(ESA) compaction, concrete mixing.
or other activities. 11 . Locate,
store, stage, operate. and
refuel equipment outside of
riparian or adjacent upland
habitats. a. Operate equipment
from previously disturbed or
modified roadbeds or road
shoulders above the riparian
habitats. b. Limit the number of
entrance and exit points
leading into the project area. c.
Stockpile topsoil and debris
outside the riparian corridor
and protect from stream flows
or runoff. 12. During the
Preble's active season (May 1
through November 1 ), work
only during daylight hours to
avoid disrupting Preble's
nocturnal activities. 13.
Promptly remove waste to
minimize site disturbance and
avoid attracting predators. 14.
Cover exposed holes or piles
of loose dirt with boards. tarps,
or other materials to prevent
entrapment. 15. Use best
management practices ( BMPs)
to limit construction-related
https://connectl .dhs.gov/emm ie/Danaln tb=isource.rem a.net,SSL+d ispatc h Destination .do?... 5/7/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 15 of 22
disturbance, such as soil
compaction, erosion. and
sedimentation , and to prevent
the spread of invasive weeds;
a. Soil compaction : Establish
one access route for workers,
vehicles. and machinery,.
preferably along a previously
disturbed surface or route. b.
Soil compaction: Temporarily
line access routes with
geotextiles or other materials,
especially in wet. unstable
soils. c. Weed control: Wash
and inspect vehicles and
equipment before entering or
leaving the project area so that
they are free of noxious weed
seeds and plant parts. d. Weed
control: Use only weed free
certified materials, including
gravel. sand , top soil, seed.
and mulch. 16. Complete
construction before beginning
restoration or enhancement
activities.
The applicant should
implement appropriate FWS
conservation measures
identified in the Emergency
Consultation between FEMA
and USFWS. dated September
Endangered 24. 2013. to the extent
possible: including a post-
Final Review Other (EHP) Species Act construction estimate of the No Approved
(ESA) amount of habitat affected by
the emergency response. an
evaluation of how conservation
recommendations were
implemented. and the results
of implementation in
minimizing adverse effects.
The applicant is responsible for
verifying and compliance with
all permit requirements.
including permit conditions,
pre-construction notification
requirements and regional
conditions as provided by the
Final Review Other (EHP) Clean Water Act US Army Corps of Engineers No Approved
(CWA) (USACE). The applicant is pp
responsible for implementing,
monitoring. and maintaining all
Best Management Practices
(BMP's) and Pre-Construction
Notification (PCN) conditions
of applicable Nation Wide
Permits (NWP). This is to
include any requirements per
littps://connectl .dlis.gov/emm ie/DanalInfo=isourcelema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 5/7/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 16 of 22
the Colorado Department of
Public Health and Environment
401 Water Quality Certification
for Clean Water Act permits.
Asphalt must be recycled as a
blended base material or
State Hazardous appropriately separated and
Final Review Other (EHP) Materials and disposed of in an approved No Approved
Solid Waste disposal site or landfill in
Laws accordance with the CDPHE
authorized waste management
regulations.
If ground disturbing activities
occur during construction ,
applicant will monitor ground
Standard disturbance and if any potential
EHP Review Other (EHP) Condition #3 archeological resources are No Recommended
discovered , will immediately
cease construction in that area
and notify the State and
FEMA.
This review does not address
all federal, state and local
requirements. Acceptance of
federal funding requires
Standard recipient to comply with all
EHP Review Other (EHP) Condition #2 federal, state and local laws. No Recommended
Failure to obtain all appropriate
federal, state and local
environmental permits and
clearances may jeopardize
federal funding.
Any change to the approved
Standard scope of work will require re-
EHP Review Other (EHP) Condition #1 evaluation for compliance with No Recommended
NEPA and other Laws and
Executive Orders.
Gravel/borrow materials for
work to be completed must be
National Historic obtained from one of the
EHP Review Other (EHP) Preservation Act following pre-approved No Recommended
(NHPA) sources: (SHPO approved
source, CO Licensed Pit.
commercial source. contractor
or county Stockpiles).
Applicant is responsible for
Executive Order coordinating with the local
floodplain manager. All
EHP Review Other (EHP) 11988 - required permits should be No Recommended
Floodplains maintained as part of the
permanent record
State Hazardous Debris must be appropriately
EHP Review Other (EHP) Materials and separated and disposed of in No Recommended
Solid Waste an approved disposal site or
Laws landfill.
Asphalt must be recycled as a
https://connectl .dhs.gov/em m ie/. Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 5/7/2014
t
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page I 7 of 22
blended base material or
State Hazardous appropriately separated and
Materials and disposed of in an approved
EHP Review Other (EHP) Solid Waste disposal site or landfill in No Recommended
Laws accordance with the CDPHE
authorized waste management
regulations.
1 . Design the project to avoid
and minimize the permanent
and temporary impacts to
riparian and adjacent upland
habitats. a. Before
construction, identify and
prioritize riparian and adjacent
upland habitats within the
project area. Design the
project so that it avoids these
habitats whenever possible. b.
Minimize the amount of
concrete. riprap, bridge
footings, and other "hard ,
impermeable engineering
features within the stream
channel and riparian or
adjacent upland habitats. c.
Use bioengineering techniques
to stabilize stream banks. d.
Minimize the number and
footprint of access routes.
staging areas, and work areas.
e. Locate access routes.
staging areas. and work areas
Endangered within previously disturbed or
EHP Review Other (EHP) Species Act modified non-habitat areas. f. No Recommended
(ESA) Maintain habitat connectivity
under bridges or through
culverts by installing ledges or
dry culverts adjacent to the
culverts with water flow. g.
Avoid fragmenting linear
riparian corridors. 2. Install
limits of work fencing (e.g. .
orange barrier netting or silt
fencing). signage, or other
visible markers to delineate
access routes and the project
area from habitats. Use this
fencing to enforce no-entry
zones. 3. Hold a
preconstruction briefing for
onsite personnel to explain the
limits of work and other
conservation measures. 4.
Follow regional stormwater
guidelines and design best
management practices (BMPs)
to control contamination ,
erosion . and sedimentation.
such as silt fences. silt basins.
gravel bags. and other controls
https://connect I .dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource. lema.net,SSL+dispatch Destination.do?... 5/7/20 14
S
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page l 8 of 22
needed to stabilize soils in
denuded or graded areas,
during and after construction.
5. Locate utilities along existing
road corridors, and if possible.
within the roadway or road
shoulder. a. Bury overhead
utilities whenever possible. b.
Directionally bore utilities and
pipes underneath habitats. 6.
Develop and implement a
habitat restoration plan that
addresses site preparation.
planting techniques. control of
non-native weeds. native seed
mixtures. and post-
construction monitoring.
17. Upon project completion.
revegetate all disturbed areas
with native shrubs, trees. and
grasses. a. Rip compacted
access routes prior to
replanting with native
vegetation. b. Fill and reseed
with weed free material and
native seed mixtures. c.
Consult the Service before
Endangered finalizing a seed and plant list.
EHP Review Other (EHP) Species Act 18. Bury riprap. then plant with No Recommended
(ESA) native riparian vegetation. 19.
Rehabilitate adjacent habitats
impacted by floodwaters to
restore connectivity and
prevent future impacts from
erosion or sedimentation. 20.
Consider monitoring the
revegetated areas for success.
The Service can help establish
success criteria during the
consultation process.
7. Contact the Service
immediately by telephone at
(303) 236-4773 if a Preble's is
found alive. dead, injured, or
hibernating within the project
area. Please also contact the
Service if any other listed
species are found within the
project area. 8. To the
maximum extent practicable,
limit disturbing (e.g. . crushing.
trampling ) or removing (e.g. .
cutting. clearing) all vegetation ,
such as willows, trees, shrubs.
and grasses within riparian and
adjacent upland habitats. a.
Restrict the temporary or
permanent removal of
vegetation to the footprint of
https://connect 1 .dhs.gov/emm ie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?. .. 5/7/20 14
ammt
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 19 of 22
the project area. b. Minimize
the use of heavy machinery
and use smaller equipment
when possible. c. Soil
compaction: Temporarily line
access routes with geotextiles
or other materials. especially in
wet. unstable soils to protect
roots and the seed bank. 9.
Use the attached table to track
the acres or square feet of
riparian and upland habitats
temporarily or permanently
affected by the response
activities. a. Temporary
Impacts: Native vegetation and
habitats will reestablish
following rehabilitation (e.g. .
access route that is
rehabilitated with native, weed-
free seeds and plants). b.
Permanent Impacts: Riparian
or upland habitats will not
return as a result of project
activities (e.g. . road surface,
concrete footings) 10. Track
the volumes of any water from
onsite sources stored or used
Endangered for dust abatement. soil
EHP Review Other (EHP) Species Act compaction. concrete mixing. No Recommended
(ESA) or other activities. 11 . Locate,
store. stage, operate. and
refuel equipment outside of
riparian or adjacent upland
habitats. a. Operate equipment
from previously disturbed or
modified roadbeds or road
shoulders above the riparian
habitats. b. Limit the number of
entrance and exit points
leading into the project area. c.
Stockpile topsoil and debris
outside the riparian corridor
and protect from stream flows
or runoff. 12. During the
Preble's active season (May 1
through November 1 ), work
only during daylight hours to
avoid disrupting Preble's
nocturnal activities. 13.
Promptly remove waste to
minimize site disturbance and
avoid attracting predators. 14.
Cover exposed holes or piles
of loose dirt with boards. tarps.
or other materials to prevent
entrapment. 15. Use best
management practices (BMPs)
to limit construction-related
disturbance, such as soil
https://connectl .dhs.gov/emm ie/,Danal nfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatc h Destination .do?... 5/7/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 20 of 22
compaction, erosion. and
sedimentation , and to prevent
the spread of invasive weeds;
a. Soil compaction: Establish
one access route for workers.
vehicles, and machinery.
preferably along a previously
disturbed surface or route. b.
Soil compaction: Temporarily
line access routes with
geotextiles or other materials,
especially in wet, unstable
soils. c. Weed control: Wash
and inspect vehicles and
equipment before entering or
leaving the project area so that
they are free of noxious weed
seeds and plant parts. d. Weed
control: Use only weed free
certified materials. including
gravel. sand , top soil. seed.
and mulch. 16. Complete
construction before beginning
restoration or enhancement
activities.
The applicant is responsible for
verifying and compliance with
all permit requirements.
including permit conditions,
pre-construction notification
requirements and regional
conditions as provided by the
US Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE). The applicant is
Clean Water Act responsible for implementing.
EHP Review Other (EHP) (CWA) monitoring, and maintaining all No Recommended
Best Management Practices
(BMP's) and Pre-Construction
Notification (PCN) conditions
of applicable Nation Wide
Permits (NWP). This is to
include any requirements per
the Colorado Department of
Public Health and Environment
401 Water Quality Certification
for Clean Water Act permits.
The applicant should
implement appropriate FWS
conservation measures
identified in the Emergency
Consultation between FEMA
Endangered and USFWS, dated September
EHP Review Other (EHP) Species Act 24. 2013. to the extent No Recommended
(ESA) possible: including a post-
construction estimate of the
amount of habitat affected by
the emergency response. an
evaluation of how conservation
recommendations were
https://connect I .dhs.gov/emmie/,Danainfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?.. . 5/7/20 14
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 21 of 22
implemented. and the results
of implementation in
minimizing adverse effects.
Internal Comments
No. Queue User Date/Time Reviewer Comments
Award 04-14-2014
5 Review SYSTEM 05:45 PM ACCEPTED
GMT
Final Reviewer finds eligible the application and approves the
funding of this project worksheet based on the applicant
Final PALACIO 04-03-2014 having performed all required procurement procedures.
4 08:20 PM perform all required special considerations recommendations
Review JOSE GMT such as permits to address EHP considerations and securing
all actual cost documentation for the financial reconciliation of
this project. Task Force Leader- J . Palacio 04/03/2014
Category: C. 75% Complete. Weld County. Weld County.
Applicant used force labor and equipment to replace fill and rip
rap around bridge. Applicant will use force labor and
equipment to replace asphalt on bridge deck and approaches.
Mitigation-None - bsherma1 - 03/17/2014 17: 39: 15 GMT
Project activities have the potential to impact Waters of the
United States or wetlands. Project involves dredge, fill.
excavation and/or modification. - bsherma1 - 03/17/2014
17: 55: 55 GMT
Project site work is in mapped wetlands. Project has no
potential to impact the wetland function or resources and
substantially restores site to pre-disaster condition. No further
wetland review is required under the 8-step process. -
bshermal - 03/17/2014 17:45:43 GMT
The entire community will benefit from the completion of this
project. - bsherma1 - 03/17/2014 17:46: 05 GMT
03-17-2014 Action is addressed under the attached Emergency
EHP DELAUNE Consultation between FEMA and USFWS. dated September
3 Review JONATHAN GMT PM 24. 2013. The consultation includes conservation measures
intended to minimize impacts to the federally listed Preble's
Meadow Jumping Mouse. Ute's Lady's Tress and Colorado
Butterfly Bush . and Designated Critical Habitat protected under
the ESA. - bsherma1 - 03/17/2014 17: 50:26 GMT
Work involves removal. staging. transporting, and/or disposal
of debris. (Includes culverts) - bsherma1 - 03/17/2014
17: 57:48 GMT
Project is located in Zone A. FIRM panel 0802660825C. dated
9/28/1982. Per 44 CFR Part 9. 5 (g) Step 1 : Project repairs are
determined to have no effect on floodplain or wetlands
provided that the repairs remain in the existing footprint and do
not impact previously undisturbed areas. No further floodplains
review is required. - bsherma1 - 03/17/2014 17:44:46 GMT
The scope of work has been reviewed and meets the criteria of
the 2013 signed Programmatic Agreement. Item III : Section
B, E. F agreed to by FEMA and the SHPO. - bsherma1 -
03/17/2014 17:54:49 GMT
The applicant is interested in 406 mitigation and has requested
2 Mitigation PETITT this be addressed at a later date when they have a better
Review MARK understanding of what they will be proposing. They have been
03-17-2014 advised that 406 mitigation cannot be applied if it requires
01 :54 PM removing complete work and it will be evaluated for eligibility
https://connect I .dhs.gov/emmie/, Danalnfo=isource. tema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination .do?... 5/7/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 22 of 22
GMT as per FEMA Recovery Policy 9526. 1 . Furthermore. the
submission of the mitigation proposal will have to be
coordinated through the Colorado Division of Emergency
Management. Mark W. Petitt, 406 Specialist
03-17-2014 Applicant's property insurance through the CAPP risk pool
1 Insurance GILLIAM 01 : 16 PM affords no coverage for bridges. roadways or embankments.
Review ROBERT GMT Insurance proceeds are not anticipated . and there is no
insurance purchase requirement.
https://connectl .dhs.gov/emm ie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net.SSL+dispatch Destination .do?... 5/7/2014
Hello