HomeMy WebLinkAbout20152949.tiff BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Moved by Joyce Smock,that the following resolution be introduced for passage by the Weld County Planning
Commission. Be it resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the application for:
CASE NUMBER: ORDINANCE 2015-15
PRESENTED BY: TOM PARKO
REQUEST: IN THE MATTER OF REPEALING AND REENACTING, WITH AMENDMENTS,
CHAPTER 19 COORDINATED PLANNING AGREEMENTS, OF THE WELD
COUNTY CODE.
be recommended favorably to the Board of County Commissioners for the following reasons:
Motion seconded by Terry Cross.
VOTE:
For Passage Against Passage Absent
Benjamin Hansford
Bruce Johnson
Bruce Sparrow
Jordan Jemiola
Joyce Smock
Michael Wailes
Nick Berryman
Terry Cross
Gene Stille
The Chair declared the resolution passed and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this
case to the Board of County Commissioner's for further proceedings.
CERTIFICATION OF COPY
I,Kristine Ranslem, Recording Secretary for the Weld County Planning Commission,do hereby certify that the
above and foregoing resolution is a true copy of the resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County,
Colorado, adopted on September 15, 2015.
Dated the 15th of September, 2015.
�� h Digitally signed by Kristine Ranslem
41)V-46611 /yG �L Win. Date:2015.09.21 10:14:47-06'00'
Kristine Ranslem
Secretary
"al-ate
Add Article VI in its entirety:
Article VI
Windsor Plan
This Coordinated Planning Agreement("CPA")is made and entered into effective as
of the _day of , 2015, A.D., between the Board of County Commissioners of
the County of Weld, State of Colorado, whose address is 1150 O Street, Greeley, CO
80631, hereinafter called the "COUNTY," and the Town of Windsor, a Colorado municipal
corporation, whose address is , Windsor Colorado 80 ,
hereinafter called the"MUNICIPALITY." The COUNTY and MUNICIPALITY are hereinafter
sometimes referred to individually as "party" and collectively as "the parties."
RECITALS
A. COUNTY exercises governmental authority regulating land use, growth and
development within the unincorporated areas of Weld County, Colorado, which areas
include lands surrounding MUNICIPALITY; and
B. MUNICIPALITY exercises governmental authority with respect to land use,
growth, and development within its municipal boundaries and regarding its annexations,
and has demonstrated the capability of providing municipal services and facilities(including
water and sewer services based on the municipality's code and/or other municipal service
policies) within the THREE (3) MILE AREA, as defined herein; and
C. Title 29, Article 20 of the Colorado Revised Statutes, grants broad authority to
local governments to plan for and regulate development and the use of land within their
respective jurisdictions, accomplishing such activities through public processes that
respect, protect, and promote private property rights; and
D. Title 29, Article 20 of the Colorado Revised Statutes, authorizes and
encourages local governments to cooperate and contract with each other for the purpose of
planning and regulating the development of land by the joint and coordinated exercise of
planning, zoning, subdivisions, building, and related regulatory powers; and
E. Pressures for growth and development in MUNICIPALITY and COUNTY
indicate that the joint and coordinated exercise by COUNTY and MUNICIPALITY of their
respective planning, zoning, subdivision, building and related regulatory powers in such
areas will best promote the objectives stated in this CPA; and
F. This CPA adheres to the objectives and Policies of the Weld County
Comprehensive Plan, set forth in Section 22-2-40 of the Weld County Code and, in
particular, UD.Goal 2., which encourages the establishment of intergovernmental
agreements concerning growth areas with each municipality in Weld County.
NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual promises and
undertakings herein set forth, the parties agree as follows:
1. PURPOSES AND OBJECTIVES. The purpose of this CPA is to establish
procedures and standards pursuant to which the parties will move toward greater
coordination in the exercise of their land use and related regulatory powers within
unincorporated areas surrounding MUNICIPALITY. The objectives of such efforts are to
accomplish the type of development in such areas which best protects the health, safety,
prosperity, and general welfare of the inhabitants of the parties and to achieve maximum
efficiency and economy in the process of development. However, any action taken
pursuant to this CPA that pertains to any land within MUNICIPALITY, for incorporated
areas, and within COUNTY, for unincorporated areas, is subject to exclusive final approval
by the governing body of MUNICIPALITY or COUNTY, respectively.
2. DEFINITIONS. For the purposes of this CPA the following terms shall be
defined as set forth herein:
2.1 DEVELOPMENT. Any land use requiring regulatory approval by the
elected governing body of the applicable party in the THREE (3) MILE AREA, except
for an amendment to a plat or a down-zoning, neither of which creates any
additional lots, and except for a Recorded Exemption or Subdivision Exemption.
Existing agricultural uses, which are lawful uses, either as uses-by-right under the
Weld County Code, or as legally existing non-conforming uses, are also exempt
from the definition of"DEVELOPMENT."
2.2. THREE(3) MILE AREA. The area as defined by Colorado
Revised Statutes, C.R.S. 31-12-105.1.E.
3. PLANNING COORDINATION. This CPA is intended to be a Comprehensive
Development Plan adopted and implemented pursuant to C.R.S. §29-20-105(2). Following
the execution of this CPA by both parties, applications to COUNTY for DEVELOPMENT
within the THREE (3) MILE AREA shall be processed and determined in accordance with
the following:
3.1 Referral. COUNTY shall refer all proposals for DEVELOPMENT
within the THREE (3) MILE AREA to MUNICIPALITY for its review and
recommendation. Such referral shall include at least a copy of the written
DEVELOPMENT proposal and preliminary COUNTY staff summary of the case.
COUNTY shall allow not less than twenty-one (21) days for MUNICIPALITY to
review the referral and furnish its recommendations to COUNTY staff prior to
formulation of the COUNTY staff recommendation. If the MUNICIPALITY does not
respond within such time, COUNTY staff may proceed with its recommendation, but
any comment or recommendation from MUNICIPALITY received on or before the
Thursday immediately preceding the meeting of the Board of County Commissioners
or Planning Commission when the matter shall be considered shall be transmitted to
the Board or Commission. If the MUNICIPALITY submits no comment or
recommendation, COUNTY may assume it has no objection to the proposal. If
MUNICIPALITY submits recommendations, COUNTY shall either include within its
written decision the reasons for any action taken contrary to the same or furnish
such reasons to MUNICIPALITY by a separate writing. MUNICIPALITY shall be
given notice of, and may appear and be heard at any hearing or other proceeding at
which COUNTY shall consider a DEVELOPMENT subject to the foregoing referral
process.
3.2 Development Within THREE (3) MILE AREA. Upon receipt of any
proposal for DEVELOPMENT within the THREE (3) MILE AREA then currently
eligible for voluntary annexation to MUNICIPALITY, COUNTY shall, in writing, at
time of a pre-application with the Department of Planning Services, notify the
proponent of the opportunity for annexation. The Director of Planning Services shall,
in writing, notify MUNICIPALITY's Mayor and Town Manager. MUNICIPALITY shall
have twenty-one (21) days following contact by the proponent, which shall be
documented in writing (with a copy of COUNTY), to notify COUNTY in writing that
MUNICIPALITY and the applicant have agreed to the terms of a pre-annexation
agreement. COUNTY shall not process any application until the completion of said
twenty-one (21) days, or until COUNTY receives notification from the
MUNICIPALITY that a pre-annexation agreement between MUNICIPALITY and the
applicant will not be pursued, whichever occurs sooner. If no such notification is
received by COUNTY during said twenty-one (21) days, processing of the
application shall continue by COUNTY to completion.
3.3 Mutuality of Impact Consideration. The parties recognize that
decisions by one party regarding development may impact property outside of its
jurisdiction. The parties agree that jurisdictional boundaries shall not be the basis
for giving any greater or lesser weight to those impacts during the course of
deliberations.
3.4 Referrals to County. MUNICIPALITY shall refer proposals for
DEVELOPMENT which lie within 500 feet of any property in unincorporated Weld
County to COUNTY for its review and recommendation. Such referral shall include
at least a copy of the written DEVELOPMENT proposal. MUNICIPALITY shall allow
not less than twenty-one (21) days for COUNTY to review same and furnish its
recommendations to MUNICIPALITY. If COUNTY submits no comment or
recommendation MUNICIPALITY may assume it has no objection to the proposal. If
COUNTY submits recommendations, MUNICIPALITY shall either include within its
written decision the reasons for any action taken contrary to the same or furnish
such reasons to COUNTY by a separate writing. Where the DEVELOPMENT is
proposed as part of an annexation of more than 10 acres, the provisions of this
section shall be deemed satisfied by compliance by MUNICIPALITY with the notice
and impact report provisions of the most current version of the Municipal Annexation
Act then in effect. COUNTY shall be given notice of, and may appear and be heard
at any hearing or other proceeding at which MUNICIPALITY shall consider a
DEVELOPMENT subject to the foregoing referral process.
4. IMPLEMENTATION OF CPA. Following the mutual execution of this CPA,
each party shall promptly enact and implement such amendments to its existing regulations
as may be necessary to give effect to the provisions of Section 3. Each party shall have
sole and exclusive discretion to determine such measures and any new ones enabling it to
perform this CPA. Each party's land use regulations as referred to herein are ordinances
whose amendment requires certain formalities, including notice and public hearings. The
mutual covenants in this section and elsewhere to implement this CPA promptly are given
and received with mutual recognition and understanding of the legislative processes
involved, and such covenants shall be liberally construed in light thereof.
5. ESTABLISHMENT OF COMMON DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.
MUNICIPALITY and COUNTY shall, within one (1) year of the effective date of this CPA,
attempt to agree to establish common development standards within designated areas,
which may include areas within MUNICIPALITY's boundaries and/or within the THREE (3)
MILE AREA. Common development standards should include, but not be limited to,
roadways(types,widths, horizontal design, access and spacing)and drainage (on-site, off-
site, discharge, easements, and regional facilities).
6. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS.
6.1 Severability. Should any one or more sections or paragraphs of this
CPA be judicially determined invalid or unenforceable, such judgment shall not
affect, impair or invalidate the remaining provisions of this CPA, the intention being
that the various sections and paragraphs are severable; provided, however, that the
parties shall then review the remaining provisions to determine if the CPA should
continue, as modified, or if the CPA should be terminated.
6.2 Termination. This CPA shall continue in effect for a period of one
year from the date first written above, and shall be renewed automatically thereafter
for successive one (1)year periods. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, either
party may terminate this CPA by giving at least twelve (12) months' written notice
thereof to the other party.
6.3 Amendment. This CPA may be amended only by a writing executed
by the parties and adopted according to the same procedures as the original
adoption (requiring the written consent of the amendment by both parties and
compliance with the procedures detailed in Sections 6.4 and 6.5 of this CPA).
6.4 Adoption by MUNICIPALITY. MUNICIPALITY shall at public
hearing(s) consider this CPA for adoption upon published notification.
MUNICIPALITY shall provide a complete record of such public hearing(s) to
COUNTY for review prior to the start of COUNTY's adoption process detailed in
Section 6.5, below.
6.5 Adoption by COUNTY. COUNTY shall, upon published notification
consider this CPA for adoption and amendment to Chapter 19 of the Weld County
Code. In the course of such adoption process, COUNTY shall review the complete
record of the public hearing(s) held by MUNICIPALITY wherein it considered this
CPA for adoption. The effective date of this CPA shall be its effective date of
amendment to the Weld County Code.
6.6 Reserved Rights. Nothing herein shall be construed to limit any
procedural or substantive rights afforded a party under law respecting the matters
that are the subject of this CPA, including without limitation any rights of referral,
participation or judicial review related to any land use or development procedure or
approval of the other party, which rights are hereby reserved to each party.
6.7 Enforcement. Either party may enforce this CPA by an action
for specific performance, declaratory and/or injunctive relief, or other equitable relief.
The parties agree the remedies for enforcement hereof are limited to non-monetary
relief, and each party hereby waives any right to seek damages for any violation of
this CPA. No other person or entity shall have any right to enforce the provisions of
this CPA.
PROPOSED MOD[ FICATIONS
TO THE WELD COUNTY CODE (WCC)
CHAPTER TO BE MODIF[ ED: Chapter 19. Coordinated Planning Agreements (CPA)
DtVIS1ON OR ARTICLE TO BE MODIFIF. D: Article VI
SECTIOV(S) PROPOSED TO BE MODIFfED: New Sections
ltAT1O�VALE FOR MODIFICATION :
Article V [ oCthis chupter was reserved for future CPA' s. The Town of Windsor' s CPA will now
occupy Article VI of this Chapter.
PROPOSF. D MODIFICAT[ON(S):
ARTICLE VI
Windsor Plan
This Coordinated Planning Agreement ("CPA") is made and entered into effective as of
the _ day of 2015, A. D. , between the Board of County Commissioners of the
County of Weld , State of Colorado , whose address is 1150 O Street, Greeley, CO 80631 ,
hereinafter called the "COUNTY," and the Town of Windsor, a Colorado municipal corporation ,
whose address is Windsor Colorado 80 , hereinafter
called the "MUNICIPALITY." The COUNTY and MUNICIPALITY are hereinafter sometimes
referred to individually as "party" and collectively as "the parties. "
RECITALS
A. COUNTY exercises governmental authority regulating land use, growth and
development within the unincorporated areas of Weld County, Colorado, which areas include
lands surrounding MUNICIPALITY; and
B . MUNICIPALITY exercises governmental authority with respect to land use,
growth , and development within its municipal boundaries and regarding its annexations, and
has demonstrated the capability of providing municipal services and facilities (including water
and sewer services based on the municipality's code and/or other municipal service policies)
within the THREE (3) MILE AREA, as defined herein ; and
C. Title 29, Article 20 of the Colorado Revised Statutes, grants broad authority to
local governments to plan for and regulate development and the use of land within their
respective jurisdictions, accomplishing such activities through public processes that respect,
protect, and promote private property rights; and
D. Title 29, Article 20 of the Colorado Revised Statutes, authorizes and encourages
local governments to cooperate and contract with each other for the purpose of planning and
2015-2949
regulating the development of land by the joint and coordinated exercise of planning , zoning ,
subdivisions, building , and related regulatory powers: and
E. Pressures for growth and development in MUNICIPALITY and COUNTY indicate
that the joint and coordinated exercise by COUNTY and MUNICIPALITY of their respective
planning , zoning , subdivision , building and related regulatory powers in such areas will best
promote the objectives stated in this CPA; and
F . This CPA adheres to the objectives and Policies of the Weld County
Comprehensive Plan , set forth in Section 22-2-40 of the Weld County Code and , in particular,
UD . Goal 2. , which encourages the establishment of intergovernmental agreements concerning
growth areas with each municipality in Weld County.
NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual promises and undertakings
herein set forth , the parties agree as follows:
1 . PURPOSES AND OBJECTIVES. The purpose of this CPA is to establish
procedures and standards pursuant to which the parties will move toward greater coordination
in the exercise of their land use and related regulatory powers within unincorporated areas
surrounding MUNICIPALITY. The objectives of such efforts are to accomplish the type of
development in such areas which best protects the health , safety, prosperity, and general
welfare of the inhabitants of the parties and to achieve maximum efficiency and economy in the
process of development. However, any action taken pursuant to this CPA that pertains to any
land within MUNICIPAIITY, for incorporated areas, and within COUNTY, for unincorporated
areas, is subject to exclusive final approval by the governing body of MUNICIPALITY or
COUNTY, respectively.
2 . DEFINITIONS. For the purposes of this CPA the following terms shall be defined
as set forth herein :
2 . 1 DEVELOPMENT. Any land use requiring regulatory approval by the
elected governing body of the applicable party in the THREE (3) MILE AREA, except for
an amendment to a plat or a down-zoning , neither of which creates any additional lots,
and except for a Recorded Exemption or Subdivision Exemption . Existing agricultural
uses, which are lawful uses , either as uses-by-right under the Weld County Code, or as
legally existing non-conforming uses, are also exempt from the definition of
"DEVELOPMENT. "
2 . 2. THREE (3) MILE AREA. The area as defined by Colorado Revised
Statutes, C.R.S. 31-12-105. 1.E.
3. PLANNING COORDINATION. This CPA is intended to be a Comprehensive
Development Plan adopted and implemented pursuant to C. R. S . § 29-20-105(2). Following the
execution of this CPA by both parties, applications to COUNTY for DEVELOPMENT within the
THREE (3) MILE AREA shall be processed and determined in accordance with the following :
3. 1 Referral. COUNTY shall refer all proposals for DEVELOPMENT within
the THREE (3) MILE AREA to MUNICIPALITY for its review and recommendation . Such
referral shall include at least a copy of the written DEVELOPMENT proposal and
preliminary COUNTY staff summary of the case. COUNTY shall allow not less than
twenty-one (21 ) days for MUNICIPALITY to review the referral and furnish its
recommendations to COUNTY staff prior to formulation of the COUNTY staff
recommendation . If the MUNICIPALITY does not respond within such time, COUNTY
staff may proceed with its recommendation , but any comment or recommendation from
MUNICIPALITY received on or before the Thursday immediately preceding the meeting
of the Board of County Commissioners or Planning Commission when the matter shall
be considered shall be transmitted to the Board or Commission . If the MUNICIPALITY
submits no comment or recommendation . COUNTY may assume it has no objection to
the proposal . If MUNICIPALITY submits recommendations, COUNTY shall either
include within its written decision the reasons for any action taken contrary to the same
or furnish such reasons to MUNICIPALITY by a separate writing . MUNICIPALITY shall
be given notice of, and may appear and be heard at any hearing or other proceeding at
which COUNTY shall consider a DEVELOPMENT subject to the foregoing referral
process.
3 . 2 Development Within THREE (3) MILE AREA. Upon receipt of any
proposal for DEVELOPMENT within the THREE (3) MILE AREA then currently eligible
for voluntary annexation to MUNICIPALITY, COUNTY shall , in writing , at time of a pre-
application with the Department of Planning Services , notify the proponent of the
opportunity for annexation . The Director of Planning Services shall , in writing , notify
MUNICIPALITY's Mayor and Town Manager. MUNICIPALITY shall have twenty-one
(21 ) days following contact by the proponent, which shall be documented in writing (with
a copy of COUNTY) , to notify COUNTY in writing that MUNICIPALITY and the applicant
have agreed to the terms of a pre-annexation agreement. COUNTY shall not process
any application until the completion of said twenty-one (21 ) days, or until COUNTY
receives notification from the MUNICIPALITY that a pre-annexation agreement between
MUNICIPALITY and the applicant will not be pursued, whichever occurs sooner. If no
such notification is received by COUNTY during said twenty-one (21 ) days , processing
of the application shall continue by COUNTY to completion .
3. 3 Mutuality of Impact Consideration. The parties recognize that
decisions by one party regarding development may impact property outside of its
jurisdiction . The paRies agree that jurisdictional boundaries shall not be the basis for
giving any greater or lesser weight to those impacts during the course of deliberations.
3 .4 Referrals to County. MUNICIPALITY shall refer proposals for
DEVELOPMENT which lie within 500 feet of any propeRy in unincorporated Weld
County to COUNTY for its review and recommendation . Such referral shall include at
least a copy of the written DEVELOPMENT proposal . MUNICIPALITY shall allow not
less than twenty-one (21 ) days for COUNTY to review same and furnish its
recommendations to MUNICIPALITY . If COUNTY submits no comment or
recommendation MUNICIPALITY may assume it has no objection to the proposal. If
COUNTY submits recommendations, MUNICIPALITY shall either include within its
written decision the reasons for any action taken contrary to the same or furnish such
reasons to COUNTY by a separate writing . Where the DEVELOPMENT is proposed as
part of an annexation of more than 10 acres, the provisions of this section shall be
deemed satisfied by compliance by MUNICIPALITY with the notice and impact report
provisions of the most current version of the Municipal Annexation Act then in effect.
COUNTY shall be given notice of, and may appear and be heard at any hearing or other
proceeding at which MUNICIPALITY shall consider a DEVELOPMENT subject to the
foregoing referral process.
4 . IMPLEMENTATION OF CPA. Following the mutual execution of this CPA, each
party shall promptly enact and implement such amendments to its existing regulations as may
be necessary to give effect to the provisions of Section 3. Each party shall have sole and
exclusive discretion to determine such measures and any new ones enabling it to perform this
CPA. Each party's land use regulations as referred to herein are ordinances whose amendment
requires ceRain formalities, including notice and public hearings. The mutual covenants in this
section and elsewhere to implement this CPA promptly are given and received with mutual
recognition and understanding of the legislative processes involved , and such covenants shall
be liberally construed in light thereof.
5. ESTABLISHMENT OF COMMON DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.
MUNICIPALITY and COUNTY shall, within one ( 1 ) year of the effective date of this CPA,
attempt to agree to establish common development standards within designated areas, which
may include areas within MUNICIPALITY's boundaries and/or within the THREE (3) MILE
AREA. Common development standards should include, but not be limited to , roadways (types,
widths, horizontal design , access and spacing) and drainage (on-site, off-site, discharge,
easements, and regional facilities) .
6. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS.
6 . 1 Severability. Should any one or more sections or paragraphs of this
CPA be judicially determined invalid or unenforceable, such judgment shall not affect,
impair or invalidate the remaining provisions of this CPA, the intention being that the
various sections and paragraphs are severable; provided, however, that the parties shall
then review the remaining provisions to determine if the CPA should continue, as
modified , or if the CPA should be terminated .
6 . 2 Termination. This CPA shall continue in effect for a period of one year
from the date first written above, and shall be renewed automatically thereafter for
successive one ( 1 ) year periods Notwithstanding the foregoing , however, either party
may terminate this CPA by giving at least twelve ( 12) months' written notice thereof to
the other party.
6 . 3 Amendment. This CPA may be amended only by a writing executed by
the parties and adopted according to the same procedures as the original adoption
(requiring the written consent of the amendment by both parties and compliance with the
procedures detailed in Sections 6 .4 and 6. 5 of this CPA) .
6.4 Adoption by MUNICIPALITY. MUNICIPALITY shall at public hearing(s)
consider this CPA for adoption upon published notification . MUNICIPALITY shall
provfde a complete record of such public hearing(s) to COUNTY for review prior to the
start of COUNTY's adoption process detailed in Section 6. 5 , below.
6 . 5 Adoption by COUNTY. COUNTY shall , upon published notification
consider this CPA for adoption and amendment to Chapter 19 of the Weld County Code.
In the course of such adoption process, COUNTY shall review the complete record of
the public hearing(s) held by MUNICIPALITY wherein it considered this CPA for
adoption. The effective date of this CPA shall be its effective date of amendment to the
Weld County Code.
6 .6 Reserved Rights. Nothing herein shall be construed to limit any
procedural or substantive rights afforded a party under law respecting the matters that
are the subject of this CPA, including without limitation any rights of referral , participation
or judicial review related to any land use or development procedure or approval of the
other party , which rights are hereby reserved to each party.
6 7 Enforcement. Either party may enforce this CPA by an action for
specific performance , declaratory and/or injunctive relief, or other equitable relief. The
parties agree the remedies for enforcement hereof are limited to non-monetary relief,
and each party hereby waives any right to seek damages for any violation of this CPA.
No other person or entity shall have any right to enforce the provisions of this CPA.
Michelle Martin, Planning Services, presented Ordinance 2015-22, providing a brief explanation over the
proposed code change allowing the Department of Planning Services Staff to approve minor
modifications to the change of zone plats, such as the removal of building envelopes. Additionally, this
proposed code change would allow developments within the Urban Development Nodes to develop
through USR's, SPR's, or Change of Zone requests
The Chair asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for or against this application.
No one wished to speak.
Motion: Forward Ordinance 2015-22 to the Board of County Commissioners along with the Planning
Commission's recommendation of approval, Moved by Benjamin Hansford, Seconded by Gene Stille.
Motion carried unanimously.
CASE NUMBER: 93,DINANCE 2015-15
PRESENTED BY: TOM PARKO
REQUEST: IN THE MATTER OF REPEALING AND REENACTING, WITH AMENDMENTS,
CHAPTER 19 COORDINATED PLANNING AGREEMENTS, OF THE WELD
COUNTY CODE.
Tom Parko, Planning Services, presented Ordinance 2015-15 and provided a brief outline of the
Coordinated Planning Agreement with the Town of Windsor.
Commissioner Wailes asked if this agreement will have any bearing on any planning cases that are
currently underway. Mr. Parko replied no.
CASE NUMBER: ORDINANCE 2015-16
PRESENTED BY: TOM PARKO
REQUEST: IN THE MATTER OF REPEALING AND REENACTING, WITH AMENDMENTS,
CHAPTER 19 COORDINATED PLANNING AGREEMENTS, OF THE WELD
COUNTY CODE.
Tom Parko, Planning Services, presented Ordinance 2015-16 and provided a brief outline of the
Coordinated Planning Agreement with the Town of Severance.
The Chair asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for or against Ordinance 2015-
15 or Ordinance 2015-16. No one wished to speak.
Motion: Forward Ordinance 2015-15 and 2015-16 to the Board of County Commissioners along with the
Planning Commission's recommendation of approval, Moved by Joyce Smock, Seconded by Terry
Cross. Motion carried unanimously.
The Chair asked the public if there were other items of business that they would like to discuss. No one
wished to speak.
The Chair asked the Planning Commission members if there was any new business to discuss. No one
wished to speak.
Meeting adjourned at 6:17 pm.
Respectfully submitted,
Kristine Ranslem
Secretary
10
Hello