Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20150928.tiff RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE APPLICATION FOR JUVENILE RESTORATIVE JUSTICE DIVERSION FUNDING FOR PILOT PROJECTS IN FISCAL YEAR 2016 AND AUTHORIZE ELECTRONIC SUBMITTAL WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board has been presented with an Application for Juvenile Restorative Justice Diversion Funding for Pilot Projects in Fiscal Year 2016 from the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, on behalf of the 19th Judicial District Attorney's Office and the Youth and Family Connections agency, to the Colorado Restorative Justice Council, commencing July 1, 2015, and ending June 30, 2016, with terms and conditions being as stated in said application, and WHEREAS, after review, the Board deems it advisable to approve said application, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the Application for Juvenile Restorative Justice Diversion Funding for Pilot Projects in Fiscal Year 2016 from the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, on behalf of the 19th Judicial District Attorney's Office and the Youth and Family Connections agency, to the Colorado Restorative Justice Council be, and hereby is, approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that Kirsta Britton, District Attorney's Office, be, and hereby is, authorized to electronically submit said application. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 8th day of April, A.D., 2015. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO ATTEST: `f , � Lj6140 EXCUSED . +/t/ C '� Barbara Kirkmeyer, Chair Weld County Clerk to the Board Mike Freeman, Pro-Tem BY. I_.. ! .._.a�. De. Clerk to the Board �! j L �, 1' 'GO`•ean P. Conway, APPROV AS TO FORM: 361 ( :a�'� 1{,4" L %.;w lie A. Cozad 7 County Attorney ~ it-tag ��� Steve Moreno��I� Date of signature: aC:.oFtC►��(4 (= 2015-0928 DA0025 MICHAEL J. ROURKE = r 915 101" Street l District Attorney , ',� P.O. Box 1167 Greeley, CO 80632 ROBERT W. MILLER Phone: (970) 356-4010 Assistant District Attorney Office of the District Attorney Fax: (970) 352-8023 Nineteenth Judicial District www•weldda.com To: Board of County Commissioners From: Kirsta Britton Director, Juvenile Diversion Date: April 6, 2015 RE: Juvenile Diversion Restorative Justice Funding Application For your approval to submit to the State, is the Juvenile Diversion Restorative Justice Funding Application for fiscal year 2015-2016. The Board approved the application to come before this meeting on April 2 via a pass around document. This is a continuation application for funding for the HB 13-1254 mandated Juvenile Diversion Restorative Justice Pilot Project. The project is funded entirely through State funds, collected from criminal defendants as a part of their court ordered fees and fines. There is no County match for this project. The project is implemented by the DA's Office, who contracts with a collaborating community agency to provide direct Restorative Justice services to Juvenile Diversion Participants. Funds for the contracted agent are provided for in this funding request. Awarded funds will be used to support the DA's Office implementing staff and for the contracted agent. 2015-0928 Juvenile Restorative Justice Diversion Funding for Pilot Projects FY' 16 Information: The Juvenile Restorative Justice Diversion Pilot Project funding applications are due April 8`h. Please complete the application and email it as a PDF to deb.witzel"ijudicial.state.co.us by 5pm April 8, 2015. Decision will be shared at the Implementation Team meeting April 2151. This application assumes the passage of 11815-1094 which provides expansion of eligible juveniles to include petty offenses—felony 3 offenses and first-time and multiple offenders at the DA's discretion. If the bill passes it will go into effect as of August 2015. Instructions: Please complete each section. Use 12pt font. Do not exceed page allotments in each section. If you have questions please contact Deb Witzel. deb.witzel(cijudicial.state.co.us SeclronGeneral Information -164%i �.. Judicial District Information: Elected District Attorney name: Michael Rourke Judicial District# 19 All counties served by the district: Weld Pilot Project Director in DA Office: Kirsta Britton Primary Contact Name: Kirsta Britton Primary Contact Email: Office Phone: 970-356-4010 x4775 Alt. Phone: 970-290-7638 kbritton@co.weld.co.us Mailing Address: PO Box 1167 City: Greeley CO I Zip: 80632 Amount Requested: How much funding are you requesting for Fiscal Year 2016? S237,904 (July 1, 2015-June 30, 2016) Section>2:iluvenile R_T Diversio"le ilot- Current.ProgramInformation (April 1, 2014:--March 31015) ; '; Program Status:In one page or less write about the program's progress and development. Where is the pilot relative to the original goals and objectives? What have been the primary challenges and obstacles? What have been the key successes and learnings? What changes have been made from the original plan and why?Has Implementation Science played into your pilot's development?Ifyes, how? In less than one year, Weld County Restorative Justice has gone from a plan to a program. A year ago, we had an idea of what we wanted to have available to Juvenile Diversion participants, had recruited some volunteers, and done some training. We now have two Restorative Justice options to refer Juvenile Diversion participants to; traditional conferencing and the Restore shoplifting program. Original goals were centered on the creation of a Restorative Justice program that would fit within the existing local juvenile justice framework. This was done through collaboration with local stakeholders and with input from Restorative Justice practitioners in Northern Colorado. Most of this goal has been accomplished, however, one objective of this goal was to recruit and train volunteers which will be on-going. The remaining original goals speak directly to reporting to the state the requirements of the legislation which is on-going through the sunset of the legislation. Goals have been revised as appropriate and are contained herein. Future goals will speak to challenges and obstacles. Because we didn't know what we were getting into when we set out to start a Restorative Justice program, our funding prohibited us from following the trajectory HB-13-1254 RJ Pilots Revised March 2015 DRAFT Juvenile Restorative Justice Diversion Funding for Pilot Projects FY' 16 of the work because we were so quickly at capacity. The addition of appropriately paid and qualified staff will allow the program to develop in a way that we've been unable to do in the past year because of our limitations with funding. Additionally, because of the quick timeline to get a program going, much of the work has happened on the fly and we've felt the effects of not having a longer planning period. We have ideas and plans that we've been unable to bring to fruition because of our limitations. We hope to move those from ideas to completed goals in the next couple of years. One benefit of going from not having a program to where we are today is that we've been able to make quick adjustments as we learn lessons. We've had major successes regarding the numbers of juveniles and victims who have been through a restorative process that just a year ago wouldn't be available for them and we learn from each of them. Our original plan was simply to provide Restorative Justice to the community and provide data to the state but how we are getting there has changed. Our initial ideas about the staff needed to make this happen vastly underestimated the work that would need to be done to get us where we are. Therefore, our staffing model has had to change. Ideally, the program would have had more time to focus on Implementation Science. As it was, we rushed through the Exploration and Installation phases and are working through the Initial Implementation stage. At this point, we'd like to shift and be able to slow down and implement the program with fidelity not only for the benefit of Restorative Justice in Weld County but also to begin to focus on how we can aid Restorative Justice implementation for other new programs. The program takes the role of aiding future programs with implementation based on this pilot period, seriously. Target Population: Describe the program's target group ofjuvenile offenders including types of crimes, demographics and the demographics for juveniles in the community. one page or less. Complete the table below for program specific demographic data. Juveniles aged 10-17 with a first-time, non-violent, non-drug related offense are currently eligible for Diversion programming. Per legislation, all misdemeanors and Class 3, 4, 5, and 6 felonies are eligible for consideration for Restorative Justice referral. The majority of our eligible referrals are misdemeanors. We have been tracking petty offenses served to provide the richest amount of data possible for research purposes and petty theft cases are the greatest number of cases served thus far in the Restorative Justice Pilot in the 19`h. As such, petty theft case numbers are included in all demographics reflecting numbers served to date. In years past, Juvenile Diversion demographics closely resembled the demographics of Greeley Evans School District 6. That has not been the case since we began tracking cases for the Restorative Justice Pilot. As you can see in the table below, which is based on numbers of juveniles eligible for Restorative Justice, we have served a far greater number of Hispanic females than any other group. In fact, Hispanic females outpace males of all ethnicities combined. As of now, we don't know if this is an anomaly and we're watching to see if adjustments need to be made either to programming or eligibility. Hispanic females represent 29% of the Greeley Evans School District 6 population and 42% of the RJ eligible cases. Additionally, school district information as reported by the Colorado Department of Education based on the fall 2014 school count shows the gender makeup equal. The number of Hispanic pupils in Greeley Evans District 6 is roughly 60% which is also the percentage of Hispanic youths represented in Restorative Justice, however, the gender makeup differs from that of the school district. Throughout Weld County in its entirety, all of which is served by the 19th Judicial District, 47% of all students report as Hispanic. Another demographic factor is the free and reduced lunch rate, which is 51% for the county and 62% for Greeley Evans School District 6. This is important as we look at a fee for service model. FIB-13-1254 RJ Pilots Revised March 2015 DRAFT Juvenile Restorative Justice Diversion Funding for Pilot Projects tit'' 16 Juveniles Served in RJ Pilot to Date Black/ American Nat. White/ African Hispanic/ Asian Indian/ Hawaiian/ Other/ Total Caucasian Latino Alaskan Pacific Unknown American Native Islander Males 9 1 13 0 0 0 1 24 Females 11 3 29 0 0 0 2 45 Total 20 4 42 0 0 0 3 69 Percent of Total Served with Limited En.lish Proficiency: 25 Number of Age 10 Age 11 Age 12 Age 13 Age 14 Age 15 Age 16 Age 17 TOTAL Juveniles 0 2 6 7 15 11 4 10 55 by AGE at referral Collaborating Organizations: If applicable, identify any collaborating organizations that have worked with the Juvenile RI Diversion Pilot. Include collaborators' (organizations, agencies or individuals) name, what capacity they served the pilot and the current status of the collaboration. ('A page or less) The DA's Office holds an MOU with Youth and Family Connections to provide Restorative Justice Conferencing and Restore to Diversion youth referred to the Weld County Restorative Justice (WCRJ) program operating within the Youth and Family Connections agency. The District Attorney's Office contracts with Youth and Family Connections to provide RJ services using funds awarded by the state as a part of the pilot project. Youth and Family Connections was identified by stakeholders in the community as the appropriate agency to house a start up Restorative Justice Program. Program staff, paid for with RJ Pilot funds, have developed and implemented a restorative justice program from the ground up, housed within the YFC agency but as a separate program from other services the agency offers. This collaboration will exist as long as it is in the best interest of Restorative Justice in Weld County. Volunteers: If applicable, identify any volunteer roles and responsibilities that have worked with the Juvenile RI Diversion Pilot Include what capacity they served the pilot and the current status of the volunteer corps. Describe any training you provided for your volunteers and how that was delivered ('A page or less) Volunteers have been recruited and trained as a part of building the program. Volunteers provide most of the conference facilitations. Volunteers receive training and then extensive mentoring before they become facilitators. Training has been done by the Restorative Justice Program Manager in collaboration with other RJ practitioners and is offered to volunteers for Weld County RJ as well as other area programs in Northern Colorado. Volunteer mentoring is done by the RJ Program Manager. Additionally, monthly trainings are offered to all program volunteers. These trainings cover a wide variety of topics and are shaped in part by volunteers' specific requests and needs. Volunteers are vital to the organization and operation of the Restore conference, which has a high administrative requirement to operate. There are 8 core volunteers with more volunteers acting as community members or recently participating in training. As a part of the collaboration between YFC and the DA's Office, the DA's Office does background checks on each volunteer which is a necessity for YFC insurance. Provide a flow chart of the Juvenile RJ Diversion Program structure: Include positions, names and relative FTE within DA's office and collaborators working on this pilot. When referring to volunteers include role, number and approximate hours served. (attach as a separate document) Attached HB-13-1254 RJ Pilots Revised March 2015 DRAFT Juvenile Restorative Justice Diversion Funding for Pilot Projects FY' 16 Section 3. Continuation;(Future) of Juvenile RJDiversian,Program Please agr that the RJ Pilots designated in HB13-1254 o c •fly sunset Decccmber 31, 2015 is section address wies the plans for th�ilots half of the year under statutory obligations AND half of the year going:t beyond. (State fiscal year July 1 20‘5,,,„—June 30, 2016)It the,,RJ ntent to provide the Juvenile Diversion 1U Pilots with funding in quarterly reimbursements f t`the full fiscal Year as long as the , Pilots are producing results w" 4K . Description of Juvenile RJ Diversion Program: Describe the Juvenile RI Diversion program. What are the procedures and activities from referral to completion? Describe any relationship with the courts including;juvenile demographics in the judicial district. How will the program incorporate the principles and best practices of RI and any other evidence- based practices? What restorative justice models will be used? What are the eligibility criteria for participants?Explain the programs capacity to meet the intended goals. How will program success be determined? Other than previously explained changes (Section 2, Program Status) will there be changes to the program in the coming fiscal year?(Julyl, 2015 -June 30, 2016)(2 pages or less) The established DA Diversion Program is a pre-adjudication model. All cases received from police agencies by the DA's Office are reviewed for eligibility of Diversion and RJ using a team approach. When a case appears eligible for RJ, intake notes and the Promise to Appear (summons issued to the family by the police agency) are provided to WCRJ staff. Eligible juveniles participate in a Diversion intake interview and the MAYSI-II and CRAFFT screening tools are administered. Staff from WCRJ attend intakes of RJ eligible youth and ask screening and suitability questions as approved by the RJ Council. WCRJ staff assign cases to available volunteers for conference and make contacts with victims. WCRJ staff and volunteers facilitate pre- conferences and conferences. Contract information is forwarded to the DA's Office Diversion Case Manager who completes follow up calls on the conference contract items and assists juvenile with referrals and contract items as needed. Once the contract is completed, the Case Manager contacts WCRJ staff who determine if a reintegration circle will be held and to arrange that circle. Once this is completed and the Diversion agreement time frame has elapsed, the Diversion case is closed and the Diversion Director closes the case in ETO. The sitting juvenile magistrate has a strong desire to assist RJ in Weld County. As the program currently serves primarily pre-adjudicated youth, he's offered assistance mobilizing volunteers and with fundraising efforts as the juvenile cases he sees are not eligible for Pilot funded programming. The 19th Judicial District consists of Weld County. Weld County school demographics as reported by CDE state that 48% of the juvenile population is white, non-Hispanic and 47% report as Hispanic. In the county, 51% of all students are eligible for free and reduced lunch. Weld County Restorative Justice is rooted in the values and principles of restorative justice practices and incorporates the 5R's throughout the RJ process. Contact is made with the victims when possible along with the community and the offenders. Voluntary participation is invited from all directly impacted parties. All parties are willing for the incident to be handled restoratively and be represented or present. To achieve an understanding of the other stakeholder's experience, especially the victim, facilitators must sensitively invite and encourage a measure of reflection, honesty, and personal accountability in the offender. The use of trained facilitators do this in part by developing their own skills through monthly training and by adhering to the Colorado Facilitator Code of Conduct and Standards of Practice. Conference Circles are conducted with no tables/barriers to the extent possible. Models and processes used are Family/Community Group Conferences. However as WCRJ expands, the opportunity to use Restorative Dialogues and Restorative Circles has also been used. Eligibility is first determined by Diversion eligibility. First time, non-violent, non-drug related offenses are eligible for Diversion. Domestic violence cases are eligible for Diversion but not for RJ referral. Both programs exclude sex related offenses. Multiple eligible cases have been referred where Diversion and RJ staff agree that they aren't suitable for RJ. There is a function in ETO to track eligibility and suitability. Our goals speak to specific needs of the program; we want to divert juveniles into RJ programming, we want HB-13-1254 RJ Pilots Revised March 2015 DRAFT Juvenile Restorative Justice Diversion Funding for Pilot Projects ''Y' Its to be efficient and effective in evaluation methods and state reporting, and we want to be able to develop and grow the program beyond the Pilot period. All of these are dependent on full funding. We've experienced the challenges of being under staffed in the first year and know that our capacity is dependent on our staffing pattern. There is much interest in the community for RJ services. We need the staff to be able to build the foundation of the program. The DA's Office has a responsibility to the people of Weld County to serve them by working to make Weld County safe. As such, recidivism rates will always be a factor in how we determine success. Additionally, aggregate feedback as provided by OMNI collected from the surveys completed by victims, offenders, and the community members will be weighed when looking at program success and areas of needed improvement. As a start up program, changes have been constant. Some of the objectives listed in the goals section speak to changes that we desire to make and will be able to do with funding to be fully staffed. State Mandates:All state funded Juvenile RI Diversion programs must meet the legislative mandates of HB13-1254- and related protocols developed by the RI Council- in the design, implementation, evaluation and data collection for the program. Describe your program protocols, technology and staff capacity to meet these specific mandates: 1) appropriate screening for eligibility; 2) administration ofpre/post participant surveys; 3) collection of data on participant demographics & case outcomes; 4) collection of recidivism data; &5) timely reporting to the state of all required program and financial information. Be speck as to how all required data will be collected& reported, including who will be responsible for this. (1 page or less) After trying various methods to determine the best way to accurately report program data, it's recently been determined that the DA's Office Diversion Director will be responsible for all data collection and reporting in the future. 1) DA's Office staff review cases sent by police agencies for prosecution. The juvenile unit, consisting of 2 Diversion program staff, 2 Deputy District Attorneys, 1 Chief Deputy District Attorney and 1 Victims Advocate discuss each case to determine eligibility for Diversion and if it appears to be eligible for RJ. Other funding sources require a formalized screen, therefore, the MAYSI-II is administered to each participant at intake. At intake, it is sometimes determined that a juvenile isn't suitable for RJ, even if they are eligible, When appropriate, a referral is made to the RJ program who then can further determine suitability of eligible referrals. 2) Because OMNI does data collection for both DCJ Diversion funded projects and also the RJ Pilot Project, they were able to combine the pre- and post-surveys required of offenders for both programs. Because the surveys are a requirement of both funding sources for the DA's Office Diversion program, DA's Office program staff are responsible for the administration of both pre- and post-surveys. 3) The DA's Office Diversion Director collects and utilizes the ETO database for all participant demographics and case outcome data. This is a work in progress as we determine the best way for two agencies to be share confidential participant information but after trial and error, having one person responsible for this task seems to be the best way for this to happen in a timely manner. 4) The DA Diversion Director will collect recidivism data using CDAC Action Viewer for local recidivism and Colorado Courts Data Access for statewide recidivism data once we have participants who have gone a year past program completion. 5) For the 2015-2016 fiscal year, the DA Diversion Director will be responsible for all data collection and reporting utilizing reports from the Weld County RJ program staff and the ETO database for program information. Financial information will be tracked using invoices and the Banner Accounting program utilized by the Weld County government and reported by the DA Diversion Director. One central person doing these tasks should help insure timeliness of reports. IIB-13-1254 RJ Pilots Revised March 2015 DRAFT Juvenile Restorative Justice Diversion Funding for Pilot Projects FY' 16 Population to Be Served: Describe the juveniles to be served including the referral sources for the juveniles, types of crimes juveniles will be referred for and level of criminogenic needs the program will address. Address how the project will accommodate youth of color, non-English speakers and their families. How will the program assure equitable access to the Juvenile RJ Diversion program regardless of race/ethnicity/cognitive ability/gender identification and other factors that will be considered? Complete the table provided to define the proposed population anticipated to be served. (1 page or less) Juveniles are referred by the police agency to the DA's Office, who determines what prosecutorial action will occur. If a determination is made that the juvenile will do Restorative Justice as a part of the DA's Diversion agreement, the case will be referred directly to the Weld County RJ program. Petty, misdemeanor and felony 3, 4, 5, and 6 cases are considered for RJ referral. Because all cases included in the RJ Pilot are first and foremost DA's Office Diversion cases, and the Diversion program is the least restrictive in the local juvenile justice continuum, offenders with a low risk of jeopardizing community safety are primarily served through this project. Non-English speaking families in Weld County are primarily Spanish speaking. The Diversion program case manager is Spanish speaking and there are RJ volunteers who are also Spanish speaking. We have been able to have RJ conferences facilitated entirely in Spanish. Because the Weld County RJ program is housed within Youth and Family Connections, which is a juvenile assessment center, there are program staff available there who are able to assist with other language translation needs if other interpretation is unavailable. Funds are sought to assist contract with a professional foreign language translator if the need arises. From the time that a referral comes to the DA's Office to the time that it goes to conference, a lot of hands touch the case and determine if the case is eligible and then if it's suitable, for Restorative Justice. The luxury of a team approach is many voices questioning why one case would not be treated the same as another which helps ensure equitable program delivery. Number of Juveniles Tar'eted to be Served (Jul 1, 2015-June 30, 2016 American Nat. Black/ White/ African Hispanic/Latino Asian Indian/ Hawaiian/ Other/ Total Caucasian Alaskan Pacific Unknown American Native Islander Males 19 1 25 Females 19 1 35 Total 38 2 60 100 Age Range of Target Population: 10-17 Percent of Total to be Served with Limited English Proficienc : 25% Program Goals,Objectives,Outcomes and Timeframes: Please briefly note the program's overarching goals. Use the form below and add goal/objective/outcome/timeframe sections as needed. Objectives are relative stepping stones with measurable outcomes and timeframes. Program Goal 1: Provide Restorative Justice programming as a sanction of the DA's Office Juvenile Diversion program agreement. Objective: Assess all first time juvenile Objective: Refer 100 Objective: To facilitate and offenders for appropriateness in diversion and juveniles per year to encourage diversion of restorative justice programming based on Restorative Justice juveniles from the juvenile offense, victim input and resources. programming in order to aid justice system to Restorative them in taking responsibility Justice practices, both to HB-13-1254 RJ Pilots Revised March 2015 DRAFT Juvenile Restorative Justice Diversion Funding for Pilot Projects FY' 16 and to provide them with an provide data to assess the opportunity to make amends efficacy of Restorative Justice to their victim and repair to reduce recidivism, to assist harm. in repairing the harm caused to victims and the community, increase victim, offender, and community member satisfaction, and reduce cost; and to promote the restorative justice principles of reconciliation, responsibility, reintegration, respect, relationship-building and restitution Outcomes: Numbers of participant and Outcomes: Number of Outcomes: Variables entered juvenile demographic information will be juveniles who participate and into the ETO database will aid available to report to the state as requested for who reach a Restorative the RJ Council in reporting verification of numbers served and inclusion Justice Agreement compared whether or not the intent of the in state reporting. to the number of juveniles legislation was successful as a who do not reach an result of the pilot program. agreement available to report to the state as requested for evaluation. Timeframe: Quarterly as funding Timeframe: Quarterly as Timeframe: Quarterly as requirements dictate. funding requirements dictate. funding requirements dictate. Program Goal 2: Provide reporting on program outcomes to the state in a timely manner. Objective: Utilize the ETO database for Objective: Weld County RJ Objective: Administer victim offender and victim demographics and will share information on and offender surveys as aspects of participation. conferences, victim provided by the state to participation and conference determine satisfaction and outcomes to the DA's Office reparation of harm as a result for inclusion in required of Restorative Justice reporting. programming. Outcomes: Data reports from the ETO Outcomes: Information Outcomes: Surveys will show database will be available and complete in a shared in a timely manner program successes or short manner which will facilitate timely reporting which will allow accurate comings and the aggregate to the state as required. input of information into the data will provide direction ETO database. both at a programmatic level and a state level to give direction to further efforts. Timeframe: Data updating will occur on a Timeframe: Conference Timeframe: Surveys sent to weekly basis, when appropriate, throughout information will be sent to the OMNI no less often than HB-13-1254 RJ Pilots Revised March 2015 DRAFT Juvenile Restorative Justice Diversion Funding for Pilot Projects ''Y' 16 the funding period. Quarterly reports will be DA's Office Diversion staff monthly for the amount of submitted as funding requirements dictate. within 3 business days of the time that funding requirements conference throughout the dictate. funding period. Program Goal 3: Develop the Weld County Restorative Justice Program for success beyond the sunset of the Pilot legislation. Objective: Use principles of Implementation Objective: Train volunteers Objective: Explore and/or Science to establish an Advisory Board for in Restorative Justice create a group conferencing guidance of the future of Weld County principles of reconciliation, model for offenses related to Restorative Justice. responsibility, reintegration, fights (disorderly conduct and respect, relationship-building third degree assault). and restitution and mentor effective conference facilitators. Outcomes: An Advisory Board will help Outcomes: An established Outcomes: A program model determine the future of the program including and knowledgeable volunteer that will address the harm of future funding sources. corps to facilitate conferences fighting and increase the and assist with programmatic efficiency of volunteer needs. facilitator time. Timeframe: By December 31, 2015 Timeframe: On-going Timeframe: On-going Collaboration: Please briefly address how collaboration supports the District Attorney's Juvenile R7 Diversion program and addresses capacity, efficiency and effectiveness.(1/2 page or less) The District Attorney's established Juvenile Diversion Program desired to offer Restorative Justice Programming and was able to do so intermittently with the use of a small number of trained volunteers in the past. Because the Diversion program has long been at capacity, further work to establish Restorative Justice programming was not possible with the existing Diversion staff. As such, when the opportunity of the Pilot came to be, collaboration with an outside source was one of the requirements to make RJ possible for Diversion participants. Community stakeholders identified YFC as the appropriate agency for whom to collaborate with for this project. In the initial year of state funding, we had not anticipated the work load and had requested an amount of funds that was not sufficient to staff the amount of work that needed to be done. In the upcoming fiscal year, an addition of RJ Case Coordinators (to equal 1 FTE) to assist in the work load will help the program to grow and develop in a way that we may increase capacity. As we were gaining footing and trying to get through the amount of new work that needed to be done, we found inefficiencies and as a byproduct of growth and two people in two collaborative agencies that can work well together, we have determined changes to make at each step to become more efficient, especially as we add more people to help with this work. This should be more apparent in the coming fiscal year as we continue to overcome growing pains. This collaboration will exist as long as it is in the best interest of Restorative Justice in Weld County. HB-13-1254 RJ Pilots Revised March 2015 DRAFT Juvenile Restorative Justice Diversion Funding for Pilot Projects FY' 16 Collaborating Organizations Contact Information: If applicable and different from the current year description, identifi)any collaborating organizations. Include organization name, main contact person,phone, e-mail, and mail address. These are organizations expected to provide direct services to juveniles on diversion or other services to the RJ Pilot. (1/2 page or less) Youth and Family Connections Weld County Restorative Justice Jenny Cottingham 2835 W. 10th Street Greeley, CO 80550 Office: 970.351.5469 Cell: 970.439.1681 RestorativeJustice(0YouthandFamilyConnections.org Collaborating Organizations' Roles and Responsibilities: For collaborators identified above, describe any collaborative activities or contract support that is directly related to this program. Include what services collaborators will provide and their qualifications for providing those services. (1/2 page or less) The Weld County Restorative Justice Program was established to serve the RJ Pilot Program mandate that the 19th Judicial District DA's Office Juvenile Diversion Program provide Restorative Justice for participants. As the collaborative agency, they provide direct conferencing services for Diversion participants and data sharing in order to comply with state reporting mandates. Staff and facilitators are trained, at a minimum, in Restorative Justice Facilitation. Training and volunteer facilitator management are done by staff as paid for with state RJ funds. The current Program Managers qualifications and trainings include a Masters in Conflict Analysis and Engagement, International Mediation, Antioch University, trained by Mark Umbreit in RJ Facilitation and RJ Facilitator Trainer of Trainers, Restorative Justice Louisville, Family and Divorce Mediator, University of Peace, Costa Rica, Certificate in Educating for Peace, Non-Violent Communication Training, middle school Peace Educator. Please include with this application a Letter of Commitment or MOUfrom each partner organization, clearly stating their understanding of their role in the District Attorney's Juvenile RJ Diversion program. Volunteers: If applicable, identify any volunteer roles and responsibilities that will work with the Juvenile RI Diversion Pilot How do you select and vet the volunteers?Include what capacity they will serve the District Attorney's Juvenile RI Diversion program and the plans for the volunteer corps (t e. training, expansion additional responsibilities to increase program capacity etc.). Describe any training that will be provided for volunteers and how that will be delivered How will volunteers be supported and services be sustained? (1/2 page or less) During the initial start up phase of this program, having juvenile justice professionals trained do all facilitation was considered. However, it felt imperative that facilitation come from the community. A call for volunteers went out using local media as one of the first steps in building the program. Those volunteers provide facilitation, coordination, and administrative functions to help WCRJ operate and serve the community. Those interested in volunteering complete an application and provide it to the DA's Office for a criminal background check. If that is clear, the application is forwarded to the Weld County RJ program for review and interview of the volunteer candidate. The volunteer will be required to complete a community member training, facilitator training, and facilitator mentoring prior to facilitating conferences. Monthly trainings on specific topics are held as well. Training is provided by the Weld County RJ Program Manager. _ HB-13-1254 RJ Pilots Revised March 2015 DRAFT Juvenile Restorative Justice Diversion Funding for Pilot Projects Y' 1t' The WCRJ Program Manager is responsible for volunteer management and support. Volunteer support and service is essential to the program. As such, funds to devote part of the Program Managers time to volunteer retention and assistance are sought as a part of this request so that existing volunteers can continue to be supported and the volunteer corps can continue to grow. Evaluation:All state funded Juvenile RI Diversion programs must record data in the Omni monitored Efforts To Outcomes (ETO)database. Please identify how the program enters and uses this data. (1/2 page or less) The DA Diversion Director is responsible for data entry regarding offenders into the ETO database. The Weld County RJ program is responsible for sharing information regarding the conference, victims, and participants to the DA Diversion Director who enters that information into the database. ETO database compiled information is used for quarterly reports to the state. This data is also beneficial in reporting to local boards and committees in regards to the progress of the newly created program. Other Evaluation: What if any other evaluation efforts are planned to sustain the Juvenile RI Diversion program? (1/2 page or less) Currently, Weld County RJ is working on ways to support the RJ intern evaluate Spanish language accessibility for RJ participants. Funds are being sought from a local foundation that would allow WCRJ to obtain a database to track volunteers and conferences. Based on early research, it is a possibility that further evaluation pieces could be a part of the database procured. Being fully funded would allow WCRJ to be able to examine other evaluations and sustainability plans. Long Term Plan: What plans does the district have to sustain Juvenile RI Diversion? What are the long term goals or vision for the District Attorney's Juvenile RI Diversion program? What will happen if state funds are not available or diminish over time?In particular identin,other funding sources that will support this program. (1/2 page or less) Ideally, the Weld County Restorative Justice program will be able to build a firm foundation during this Pilot period and at the end of this phase of the Pilot project will be able to expand and serve other populations. The collaboration between the DA's Office and WCRJ will remain as long as it makes sense to do so at which time, we anticipate WCRJ to be able to sustain itself on its own and take referrals from Diversion, Probation, Senate Bill 94, the schools, or other entities who can help support the program with referrals, without the fiscal and administrative support of the DA's Office. Being a part of this pilot allows Weld County RJ to become established using Implementation Science principles and end this season of full funding with years of rich data to share with future funding sources. Currently, two local foundations have expressed support and Probation has begun to send youth to Restore using offender service funds available to them. These funds are few and are reflected in the budget portion in the Contracted Consultant and Professional Services section. There are other funding sources, such as JAG and El Pomar, which have been examined but not yet applied for so that the program can have solid plans and footing as a result of Pilot work and will be in a more competitive position to apply for those funds in the future. HB-13-1254 RJ Pilots Revised March 2015 DRAFT Juvenile Restorative Justice Diversion Funding for Pilot Projects re Sectron 4 Juvenile RJ9jversion Budget In the et tab e,below list by lute item the total ptW am cost b .d Add lme y ake 8U-read indicate where state fundt qu n tested to cover the versus which funds t DA's ojiee or of er sources ark providing funds w�C.. t :4-10 " Ce ROUND ALL AMOUNTS TO THE NEAREST WHOLE DOLLAR. 1. PERSONNEL (1) (2) (3) (4) TOTAL Funding Source Annual Annual Sub-Total % of Full-time Fringe time for Other Salary Benefit This State $ Funds Cost Project Director $71,792 $30,871 =102,663 X 50% $102,663 51,332 51,332 Case Manager $45,385 $19,516 =64,901 X 30% $64,901 19,470 45,431 + = X % $ = X % $ TOTAL PERSONNEL COST $167,564 70,802 96,763 TOTAL Funding Source State $ Other 2. TRAINING, SUPPLIES AND OPERATING (BE SPECIFIC) Funds General office supplies for RJ specific tasks $200 200 General office supplies for DCJ Diversion specific tasks $600 600 TOTAL TRAINING, SUPPLIES AND OPERATING COSTS $800 200 600 TOTAL Funding Source 3. TRAVEL (Designate purpose and specify in-state and out-of-state State $ Other travel.) Funds In state quarterly meetings and trainings specific to RJ $1300 1300 In state quarterly meetings and trainings specific to DCJ Diversion $700 700 Pikes Peak RJ Symposium travel and hotel expenses 1000 1000 TOTAL TRAVEL COST $3000 2300 700 HB-13-1254 RJ Pilots Revised March 2015 DRAFT Juvenile Restorative Justice Diversion Funding for Pilot Projects FY 16 TOTAL Funding Source State S Other 4. EQUIPMENT Funds $0 • TOTAL EQUIPMENT COST $0 5. CONTRACTED CONSULTANT AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TOTAL Funding Source Attach a copy of each contract with a detailed budget. State S Other Funds Youth and Family Connections — Weld County RJ (see attached) $198,383 164,602 33,781 OMNI for DCJ evaluation $1000 1000 TOTAL CONTRACTED COST $199,383 164,602 34,781 6. TOTAL OF ALL PROJECT Funding Source COSTS (section 1 through 5) TOTAL State % of Total Other % of Total Funding Sources TOTAL COST $370,747 $237,904 64% $132,844 36% Budget Narrative: Provide a justification and explanation of the budget items listed in the Budget Table. The budget narrative must use the same category subheadings (e.g., 1. Personnel, 2.Training, Supplies and Operating Expenses, etc.); and explain the basis for prorating where applicable. Describe the criteria used to compute budget figures. All budget figures should be justified and explained. The budget narrative should show the relationship between budget figures and proposed project operations. For example, if an expense is for training, an explanation of the professional benefits and the need for consultants to provide the training and the hourly cost of the services to be provided. It is important that you describe how maximizing resources will be accomplished.(2 pages or less) PERSONNEL The amount requested will fund 50% of the Director salary and 32% of the Case manager salary. Salary is based on the Counties scheduled pay scale. The cost of benefits is approximately 45% of the base salary, dependant on date of hire. Benefits include health, dental and vision insurance, disability and life insurance, and mandatory retirement savings. Personnel amounts could be subject to a budget revision once a determination of funding level has been made as a DCJ Juvenile Diversion award. HB-13-1254 RJ Pilots Revised March 2015 DRAFT Juvenile Restorative Justice Diversion Funding for Pilot Projects FY' tc The amount included for the Director's position includes the annual base salary of $71,792 with $30,871 in benefits, totaling $102,663. Cost of living and scheduled step increases will occur during the funding cycle and are factored into those costs. Approximately 50% of the Directors time will be spent on Restorative Justice Pilot functions, review and determination of eligible cases for referral, data collection and reporting, program process, and administrative functions that allow the 19111 Judicial District to follow the requirements of HB 13-1254 and JIB 15-1094. The base salary of the case manager position is $45,385 with benefits costing $19,516. Cost of living and scheduled step increases will occur during the funding cycle and are factored into those costs. The case manager salary was set after reviewing the pay rates of similar positions in the County. The case manager will be responsible for administrative functions including completing and scanning referrals to the Weld County RJ program, providing follow up and referral after pre-conference and conference, communicating with WCRJ on the status of participant agreement completion, and administration of pre- and post-surveys. TRAINING, SUPPLIES AND OPERATING COSTS The budgeted amount of$200 was calculated based on expenses from the 14-15 fiscal year. The DA's Office spent approximately $200 on the printing of triplicate RJ forms to be used at intake to help facilitate a more efficient intake process for youth that are being referred to RJ at Diversion intake. The requested amount will cover reprinting of forms as needed. TRAVEL The travel budget was based on estimates of mileage expenses needed to travel to trainings as offered by the RJ Council in Boulder and Denver and mileage and potential hotel expenses for quarterly implementation team meetings in Boulder, Pueblo, and Alamosa. The Weld County reimbursement rate is 55 cents per mile and was used to factor this cost. Average hotel rates in Pueblo and Alamosa were researched as well. Additional funds are requested to attend the Pike Peak RJ Symposium scheduled for September of 2015. This symposium in 2013 was invaluable and the DA Diversion Director looks forward to the wealth of knowledge and networking that will occur again in 2015. EQUIPMENT There are not anticipated equipment needs for the DA's Office RJ Diversion staff in the upcoming fiscal year. CONTRACTED CONSULTANT AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Personnel: RJ Program Manager (1 FTE) - is employed through Youth & Family Connections and performs the overall management duties for the Weld County Restorative Justice Program (WCRJ), including, but not limited to program development, staff/volunteer development, management and oversight. Assists the organization's Executive Director, as needed, with all aspects of the program. Salary, benefits, and administrative expenses* = $69,500.04 RJ Case Coordinator (.75 EVE) - is employed through Youth & Family Connections and is responsible for Restore programming to include scheduling and corresponding with volunteers and business representatives and administrative tasks of program implementation, and facilitating RJ conferences. Salary, benefits, and administrative expenses* = $48,683.68 RJ Case Manager (.5 FTE) - employed through Youth & Family Connections and is responsible for managing ongoing conferencing cases for the Weld County Restorative Justice Program (WCRJ) and assisting the Program Manager, as needed, in other aspects of the program. Salary and administrative expenses* = $13,509.29 RJ Program Assistant (.6 FTE)—is employed through Youth & Family Connections and is responsible for assisting the Program Manager and Case Coordinator in the management of ongoing conferencing cases for the Weld County Restorative Justice Program (WCRJ). The RJ Program Assistant assists the Program Manager and HB-13-1254 RJ Pilots Revised March 2015 DRAFT Juvenile Restorative Justice Diversion Funding for Pilot Projects FYI 16 Case Coordinator with other aspects of the program. The salary is $29,208.89 less $1000 to account for the budgeted amount of Offender Service Funds anticipated to be collected from Probation for Probation clients participating in WCRJ Restore sessions. Salary and administrative expenses* _ $28,208.89 * Benefits include retirement, health insurance, life insurance, disability insurance, and dental insurance for all regular employees working more than 30 hours per week. Administrative expenses include unemployment insurance, workers' compensation, social security, quickbook fees and administrative expenses associated with hiring, payroll, fiscal management and human resources management of all part-time and full-time employees. Operating Expenses: Program Supplies: Misc. supplies needed for Restorative Justice program implementation and management ranging from office supplies to refreshments for conferences. $1,500 Travel: The travel budget was based on estimates of mileage expenses needed to travel to trainings as offered by the RJ Council in Boulder and Denver and mileage and potential hotel expenses for quarterly implementation team meetings in Boulder, Pueblo, and Alamosa. The Weld County reimbursement rate is 55 cents per mile and was used to factor this cost. Average hotel rates in Pueblo and Alamosa were researched as well. Additional funds are requested for one person to attend the Pike Peak RJ Symposium scheduled for September of 2015. An additional amount($400) is requested to pay mileage expenses for conferences held in the southern part of the county as the program is headquartered in Greeley. Conferences are held in the community harmed requiring travel to towns such as Lochbuie, Dacono, Frederick, Firestone, etc. $2,700 Foreign Language Translation: Spanish language speakers will be employed by the program and Spanish speaking volunteers are also a part of the program, however, when unable to assist or when another language is required, funds are needed to provide language translation in the native language of conference participants. $500 Administrative In-Kind Contributions: Project Director & Staff Support—Youth & Family Connections (YFC): As the Weld County Collaborative (HB04-1451 Collaborative Management Program/Interagency Oversight Group) Youth & Family Connections will provide leadership, coordination and program oversight throughout the Restorative Justice Pilot Program's development and implementation; staff support for planning; assistance for required reporting activities; and active participation in technical assistance activities, planning meetings, and will work collaboratively with community partners. YFC staff will also provide input and review all documents and processes produced through this pilot stage. YFC stall'also participation in statewide planning and oversight activities as necessary. Personnel: Executive Director—Youth & Family Connections (.1 FTE) = $11,009.25 in-kind Executive Assistant—Youth & Family Connections (.1 FTE) = $4,227.67 in-kind Phone: $432.00 in-kind Utilities (based on sq. ft. used by program): $552.00 in-kind Indirect Expenses: 10% of budget minus administrative expenses to cover additional costs associated with office space, office supplies, miscellaneous equipment and technology support: $16,560.19 Total Administrative & In-Kind Contributions: $32,781.11 HB-13-1254 RJ Pilots Revised March 2015 DRAFT Juvenile Restorative Justice Diversion Funding for Pilot Projects FY'16 Will this project BE FUNDED using additional funds other than those provided from this grant? X_YES/ NO Please note by name any other funding sources for the Juvenile RJ Diversion program. List the type and amount of other funding that will be provided to this project. Fund Type/Describe Amount Federal: State: $74,297 County Government: $24,766 Municipal Government: Private: Fees: $3,000 Other—specify: Offender Services funds for Probation clients to attend Restore $1,000 In-kind contribution for administration and facilities from YFC $32,781 TOTAL Additional Funds 135,844 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT: The District Attorney's office will be responsible for financial management and reporting for all funds granted and expended for this project. The State Court Administrators Office expects there to be supporting documentation available upon request for all expenditures. Beginning FY '16 all grant funds will be distributed on a reimbursement basis only. IIB-13-1254 RJ Pilots Revised March 2015 DRAFT Juvenile Restorative Justice Diversion Funding for Pilot Projects FY 16 Support information for Budget Narrative: The following is specific information required for each budget category: 1. PERSONNEL: Explain how the salary and fringe benefit rates for each position were determined. An explanation and justification is required if the budget is not for an entry-level position(s). Provide documentation to show that the proposed salary is one that is paid for equivalent positions and employee qualifications in your area. Include the qualifications required for each position and a specific job description as Attachment B at the end of the application. If salaries are expected to increase during the project year, indicate the percentage increases for each position, the months covered by the increases, and justify them. Be sure that scheduled salary increases have been included in the Budget Table and Narrative. NOTE: Contract employees or independent contractors should be shown under Consultant/ Professional Services, not Personnel. 2. TRAINING,SUPPLIES AND OPERATING: Explain how the costs were determined and justify the need for the various line items. Items with a unit cost less than $5,000 are considered supplies and should be listed in this category. Items costing $5,000 or more should be listed under Equipment (see 4 below). If software is being purchased, regardless of the price, it belongs in the Supplies and Operating category. All purchases should be made through competitive bid, state or local award, or established purchasing procedures. 3. TRAVEL: Explain the relationship of each cost item to the project, (e.g., if training or conference travel expenses are requested, explain the topic of the conference and its relationship to the project). Out-of- state travel is discouraged and needs to be thoroughly justified. It is prudent to include in the budget the costs associated with sending project staff to the Implementation Team Meetings and RJ Council sponsored trainings. 4. EQUIPMENT: Equipment is defined as an item that has a unit cost of 55,000 or more (except software) and a useful life of over one year. Explain why the proposed equipment is essential to conducting the project and is not currently available for use within your agency or organization. If the proposed equipment is to be shared with entities outside this project, the cost should be prorated based upon the percentage of use of the equipment by this project. DCJ must provide prior written approval for the actual purchase of all equipment, separate from approval to fund the project. All equipment must be purchased through competitive bid, state or local award, or established purchasing procedures. 5. CONTRACTED, CONSULTANT AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES: Explain why proposed consultant services cannot or should not be provided by project staff Explain how the hourly rate or flat rate was determined. For each consulting organization, indicate the number of people to be assigned to the project, number of hours per person per day to be spent on the project, and a breakdown of the contract price by major cost item. Professional services should be procured competitively. Sole source contracts must be justified and are always subject to prior written approval from RJ Council, separate from approval to fund the project. HB-13-1254 RJ Pilots Revised March 2015 DRAFT Hello