The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20152507.tiff Tyler PC Tyler 2015-2507 Exhibits 657-1013 Prior At pg # EX# to Hrg Hrg 13 657 Surrounding Property Owner - Robert Tews email dated July 7. 2015 X 14 658 Surrounding Property Owner — Claire Richardson letter dated July 6. 2015 X 16 659 I Surrounding Property Owner — Maryssa Yarbrough email dated July 8. 2015 X 17 660 Surrounding Property Owner — Mike Kintzley email dated July 8, 2015 X 18 661 Surrounding Property Owner — Rodney Roth email dated July 8, 2015 X 19 662 Surrounding Property Owner — Peggy Schaffer email dated July 8. 2015 X 20 663 Surrounding Property Owner — Ken Schaffer email dated July 8. 2015 X 21 664 Surrounding Property Owner — Linda Schaffer email dated July 8, 2015 X 22 665 Surrounding Property Owner — Donald Schaffer email dated July 8. 2015 X 23 666 Surrounding Property Owner — Donald Schaffer email dated July 8. 2015 X 24 667 Surrounding Property Owner — Brittany Rice email dated July 8 . 2015 X 25 668 Surrounding Property Owner — Casey Rice email dated July 8, 2015 X 26 669 Surrounding Property Owner — Scott Gudahl email dated July 7, 2015 X 28 670 Surrounding Property Owner - Dezaree Yarbrough email dated 8. 2015 X P Y 9 July 29 r 671 Surrounding Property Owner — Laurie Hill email dated July 8, 2015 X 30 672 Surrounding Property Owner — Daniel Hill email dated July 8. 2015 X 31 673 Surrounding Property Owner — James McDonald email dated July 8, 2015 X 32 674 Surrounding Property Owner — Kelsey McDonald email dated July 8, 2015 X 33 675 Surrounding Property Owner — Tyler Green email dated July 8, 2015 X 34 676 Surrounding Property Owner — Severino Rivera Jr. email dated July 8. 2015 X 35 677 Surrounding Property Owner — Marty Hill email dated July 8, 2015 X 36 678 Surrounding Property Owner — Holly Hill email dated July 8, 2015 X 37 679 Surrounding Property Owner — Daniel Lockman email dated July 8. 2015 X 38 680 Surrounding Property Owner — Jim McKenzie email dated July 8, 2015 X 39 681 Surrounding Property Owner — Travis King email dated July 8, 2015 X 40 682 Surrounding Property Owner - Tim Van Horn email dated July 8, 2015 X 41 683 Surrounding Property Owner — Pat King email dated July 8, 2015 X 42 684 Surrounding Property Owner — David Bacon email dated July 8. 2015 X 43 685 Surrounding Property Owner — Manuel Rodriguez email dated July 8. 2015 X Page 24 of 35 44 686 Surrounding Property Owner — Gary Douglas email dated July 8, 2015 X 45 687 Surrounding Property Owner — Jim Dreiling email dated July 8, 2015 X 46 688 Surrounding Property Owner — Lyle Walker email dated July 8, 2015 X 47 689 Surrounding Property Owner — Arnold Burns email dated July 8 . 2015 X 48 690 Surrounding Property Owner — Kenneth Beattie email dated July 8, 2015 X 49 691 Surrounding Property Owner — Rick Roth email dated July 8, 2015 X 50 692 Surrounding Property Owner — William & Donna Berglin letter dated July 4, 2015 X 51 693 Surrounding Property Owner — Ruth Rivera Jr. email dated July 8, 2015 X 52 694 Surrounding Property Owner — Charles Garretson email dated July 8, 2015 X 53 695 Surrounding Property Owner — Scott Heffernan email dated July 8, 2015 X 54 696 Surrounding Property Owner — Janet Vondy email dated July 8, 2015 X 55 697 Surrounding Property Owner — Dean Derr email dated July 8. 2015 X 57 698 Surrounding Property Owner — Thomas Wertz email dated July 8, 2015 X 58 699 Surrounding Property Owner — Renee Somers email dated July 8, 2015 X 59 700 Surrounding Property Owner — Shawn Shanahan email dated July 8, 2015 X 60 701 Surrounding Property Owner — Tad Shanahan email dated July 8, 2015 X 61 702 Surrounding Property Owner — John Gasperetti email dated July 8 , 2015 X 62 703 Surrounding Property Owner — Katie Gasperetti email dated July 8. 2015 X 63 704 Surrounding Property Owner — Taylor Shananhan email dated July 8, 2015 X 64 705 Surrounding Property Owner — Mistier Trucking . Inc. c/o Edmund A. Mistier letter received X July 9. 2015 65 706 Surrounding Property Owner — Sharon Vavra letter received July 9 , 2015 X 66 707 Surrounding Property Owner — Jeanette Scott letter received July 9, 2015 X 67 708 Surrounding Property Owner — Michael Scott letter received July 9, 2015 X 68 709 Surrounding Property Owner — Craig Mattison letter received July 9, 2015 X 69 710 Surrounding Property Owner - Joaquin a Perez letter received July 9. 2015 X 70 711 Surrounding Property Owner - Marco Medrano letter received July 9, 2015 X 71 712 Surrounding Property Owner — Ruben Mejias letter received July 9 . 2015 X 72 713 Surrounding Property Owner — Ramon Perez Salano letter received July 9, 2015 X 73 714 Surrounding Property Owner — Loren Morgan letter received July 9. 2015 X 74 715 Surrounding Property Owner — Carlos Ruie Martinez letter received July 9, 2015 X Page 25 of 35 75 716 Surrounding Property Owner - Roberto Brado letter received July 9, 2015 X 76 717 Surrounding Property Owner — Jose Saenz letter received July 9, 2015 X 77 718 Surrounding Property Owner — Kathy G . Nelson letter received July 9. 2015 X 78 719 Surrounding Property Owner — Andrew Thomas letter received July 9, 2015 X 79 720 Surrounding Property Owner — Cathy Nelson letter received July 9, 2015 X 80 721 Surrounding Property Owner — Steve Lurtz letter received July 9, 2015 X 81 722 Surrounding Property Owner — Victor Hernandez letter received July 9, 2015 X 82 723 Surrounding Property Owner — Lloyd J Smith letter received July 9. 2015 X 84 724 Surrounding Property Owner — Tim Kuball letter received July 9. 2015 X 85 725 Surrounding Property Owner — Vance Kyle Somers letter received July 9, 2015 X 86 726 Surrounding Property Owner - David Reichert letter received July 9 . 2015 X 87 727 Surrounding Property Owner — Amanda Billmire letter received July 9, 2015 X 88 728 Surrounding Property Owner — Josh Billmire letter received July 9. 2015 X 89 729 Surrounding Property Owner — Kenneth Grass letter received July 9, 2015 X 90 730 Surrounding Property Owner — Lori Grass letter received July 9, 2015 X 91 731 Surrounding Property Owner — Tori Grass letter received July 9, 2015 X 92 732 Surrounding Property Owner — Mathew Beasley letter received July 9 . 2015 X 93 733 Surrounding Property Owner - Tom Dikel letter received July 9. 2015 X 94 734 Surrounding Property Owner — Stephanie Dinkel letter received July 9. 2015 X 95 735 Surrounding Property Owner — Steph Wahl letter received July 9, 2015 X 97 736 Surrounding Property Owner - Cheryl (Chris) Friede letter dated July 10. 2015 X 101 737 Surrounding Property Owner — Karin Lawrence letter dated July 10, 2015 X 103 738 Surrounding Property Owner — J . Michael Earwood letter dated July 10, 2015 X 104 739 Surrounding Property Owner - Roslyn Ruppert letter dated July 10, 2015 X 105 740 Surrounding Property Owner — Pam Clark letter dated July 10, 2015 X 106 741 Surrounding Property Owner — Karina Yoch letter received July 11 . 2015 X 107 742 Surrounding Property Owner — Joseph Oransky letter received July 12 . 2015 X 108 743 Surrounding Property Owner — Gordon E Claus letter dated July 12 , 2015 X 109 744 Surrounding Property Owner — Hannah Robinson letter dated July 12 . 2015 X 110 745 Surrounding Property Owner — Toni Bermudez email dated 12, 2015 X p Y July 111 746 Surrounding Property Owner - Motherlove c/o R .J . Ottaviano email received July 13 . 2015 X Page 26 of 35 112 747 Surrounding Property Owner — Carol Dinkel email dated July 13, 2015 X 113 748 Surrounding Property Owner — Karen Dinkel email dated July 13, 2015 X 114 749 Surrounding Property Owner — Bob Niesent email dated July 13, 2015 X 115 750 Surrounding Property Owner — Terri Niesent email dated July 13. 2015 X 116 751 Surrounding Property Owner — Dillon Niesent email dated July 13. 2015 X 117 752 Surrounding Property Owner — Heather Niesent email dated July 13, 2015 X 118 753 Surrounding Property Owner — Dale Niesent email dated July 13, 2015 X 119 754 Surrounding Property Owner — Linda Niesent email dated July 13. 2015 X 120 755 Surrounding Property Owner — Tavias Niesent email dated July 13. 2015 X 121 756 Surrounding Property Owner — Willard Niesent email dated July 13, 2015 X 122 757 Surrounding Property Owner - Charlotte Niesent email dated July 13. 2015 X 123 758 Surrounding Property Owner — Christina Intermill email dated 13. 2015 X p Y July 124 759 Surrounding Property Owner — William Reiff email dated July 13, 2015 X 125 760 Surrounding Property Owner — Steve Martin email dated July 13, 2015 X 127 761 Surrounding Property Owner — Steve Martin email dated July 13, 2015 X 128 762 Surrounding Property Owner — Melanie Schlotter letter dated July 12, 2015 X 129 763 Surrounding Property Owner — Kathy L. Hungsberg letter dated July 13, 2015 X 130 764 Surrounding Property Owner — Jeff J . Lawrence letter dated July 13, 2015 X 131 765 Surrounding Property Owner — Christine Thomas letter dated July 9, 2015 X 132 766 Surrounding Property Owner — Glenn and Melanie Schlotter letter dated July 12, 2015 X 133 767 Surrounding Property Owner — Jason Helm email dated July 14. 2015 X 134 768 Surrounding Property Owner — Tim Kuball email dated July 14. 2015 X 135 769 Surrounding Property Owner — Darren Bucklen email dated July 14, 2015 X 136 770 Surrounding Property Owner — Dave Gerk email dated July 14, 2015 X 137 771 Surrounding Property Owner — Jacob Benson email dated July 14 . 2015 X 138 772 Surrounding Property Owner — Garrett Gordon email dated July 14, 2015 X 139 773 Surrounding Property Owner - Christopher Parker email dated July 14. 2015 X 140 774 Surrounding Property Owner — Harlan Uttenbogaard email dated July 14 , 2015 X 141 775 Surrounding Property Owner - Aaron Coulter email dated July 14. 2015 X 142 776 Surrounding Property Owner — Jose Garcia email dated July 14. 2015 X 143 777 Surrounding Property Owner — Harold and Wilma Andrews email dated July 13, 2015 X Page 27 of 35 144 778 Surrounding Property Owner — Kathy Hingtgen email dated July 1 . 2015 X 145 779 Surrounding Property Owner — Steph Wall letter dated July 10, 2015 X 146 780 Surrounding Property Owner — Rich Hanzel email dated 14 . 2015 X P Y July 147 781 Surrounding Property Owner — Gerrard Companies c/o Gary Gerrard letter dated July 1 , X 2015 149 782 Surrounding Property Owner — Gary Mattson letter dated June 29. 2015 X 151 783 Surrounding Property Owner — Cherry Smith email dated July 6, 2015 X 153 784 Surrounding Property Owner — Mike Urban email dated July 15. 2015 X 155 785 Surrounding Property Owner — King Contracting , Inc. c/o Randal F. King email dated July X 15, 2015 157 786 Surrounding Property Owner — Jesus A Leyva email dated July 15. 2015 X 159 787 Surrounding Property Owner — Olga Wallace email dated July 14, 2015 X 163 788 Surrounding Property Owner — Kris Gorman email dated July 15, 2015 X 164 789 Surrounding Property Owner — Ron Pernicka email dated May 12 . 2015 X 165 790 Surrounding Property Owner — Shirley Schwalm letter dated May 22, 2015 X 167 791 Surrounding Property Owner — Lloyd Schwalm letter dated May 22 . 2015 X 169 792 Surrounding Property Owner — Taunya Feyen email dated May 28, 2015 X 172 793 Surrounding Property Owner — Sue Thomas letter dated July 15. 2015 X 174 794 Surrounding Property Owner — Julie Goettemoeller email dated July 15, 2015 X 175 795 Surrounding Property Owner — Peggy Pellizzari letter dated July 15, 2015 X 176 796 Surrounding Property Owner — John Byars email dated July 15, 2015 X 177 797 Surrounding Property Owner — Charles and Judy Hemphill letter dated July 15, 2015 X 178 798 Surrounding Property Owner - Richard Moyer email dated July 15. 2015 X 180 799 Surrounding Property Owner — Amberl nn Moorehouse emal dated 16, 2015 X p Y Y July 181 800 Surrounding Property Owner — Chad Ingalls email dated July 16, 2015 X 182 801 Surrounding Property Owner — Ashley Selden email dated July 16, 2015 X 183 802 Surrounding Property Owner — Wayne Saunders email dated July 16. 2015 X 184 803 Surrounding Property Owner — Mike Minaga email dated July 16, 2015 X 185 804 Surrounding Property Owner — Bonne Cooper letter dated July 16. 2015 X 187 805 Surrounding Property Owner — Sharon L. Collins, MD, FACS letter dated July 16, 2015 X 189 806 Surrounding Property Owner - Maxine Brungardt letter dated July 16. 2015 X 190 807 Surrounding Property Owner - John Foster letter dated July 16. 2015 X 191 808 Surrounding Property Owner — Perry Bourgeois email dated July 16. 2015 X Page 28 of 35 192 809 Surrounding Property Owner — Ray F. Rocha email dated July 16 . 2015 X 193 810 Surrounding Property Owner — Debbie Rocha email dated July 16, 2015 X 194 811 Surrounding Property Owner — John Reyum email dated July 16 . 2015 X 195 812 Surrounding Property Owner — Tina Magnuson email dated July 16, 2015 X 196 813 Surrounding Property Owner — Doug Magnuson email dated July 16, 2015 X 197 814 Surrounding Property Owner - Esmeralda Reyna email dated July 16, 2015 X 198 815 Surrounding Property Owner — Keith Iverson email dated July 16, 2015 X 199 816 Surrounding Property Owner — Jeff Sutherland email dated July 16, 2015 X 200 817 Surrounding Property Owner — Joe Sutherland email dated July 16. 2015 X 201 818 Surrounding Property Owner — Jake Sutherland email dated July 16, 2015 X 202 819 Surrounding Property Owner — Shari Martin email dated July 16, 2015 X 203 820 Surrounding Property Owner — Mike Armstrong email dated July 16 . 2015 X 204 821 Surrounding Property Owner — Troy J . Staudinger email dated July 16, 2015 X 205 822 Surrounding Property Owner — Katherine M . Reiff email dated July 16, 2015 X 206 823 Surrounding Property Owner — Deane Becker email dated July 16, 2015 X 207 824 Surrounding Property Owner — Gary Hooker email dated July 16. 2015 X 208 825 Surrounding Property Owner — Randy Solomon email dated July 16, 2015 X 209 826 Surrounding Property Owner — PLM Asphalt and Concrete c/o Nathan Amsinger email X dated July 16, 2015 210 827 Surrounding Property Owner — Sharlene N . Vanderslice letter dated July 16, 2015 X 211 828 Surrounding Property Owner — Gwen Cook email dated July 16, 2015 X 212 829 Surrounding Property Owner — Michael Long email dated July 17. 2015 X 213 830 Surrounding Property Owner — Travis Miller email dated July 16, 2015 X 214 831 Surrounding Property Owner — Tiffany Miller email dated July 16. 2015 X 215 832 Surrounding Property Owner — Hilary A. Schafer letter dated July 16, 2015 X 217 833 Surrounding Property Owner — Mary Herrera letter dated July 16, 2015 X 218 834 Surrounding Property Owner — Larry Buckendorf, Journey Homes dated July 17, 2015 X 219 835 Surrounding Property Owner — Larry Buckendorf, Journey Homes dated July 17, 2015 X 220 836 Surrounding Property Owner — Dr. Cara Brown letter dated July 17, 2015 X 221 837 Surrounding Property Owner — J . Matthew Brown letter dated July 17, 2015 X 222 838 Surrounding Property Owner — Dr. Cara Brown letter dated July 17. 2015 X 223 839 Surrounding Property Owner — Herman Naranjo letter dated July 17, 2015 X Page 29 of 35 224 840 Surrounding Property Owner — GLH Construction letter dated July 17, 2015 X 225 841 Surrounding Property Owner — Jamie Mount letter dated July 17, 2015 X 226 842 Surrounding Property Owner — Guillermo Hernandez letter dated July 17, 2015 X 227 843 Surrounding Property Owner — Bereniz Hernandez letter dated July 17, 2015 X 228 844 Surrounding Property Owner — Gerardo Hernandez letter dated July 17, 2015 X 229 845 Surrounding Property Owner — Rudy Riojas letter dated July 17, 2015 X 230 846 Surrounding Property Owner — Brooke Hamilton Benjestorf letter dated July 17, 2015 X 231 847 Surrounding Property Owner — Austin Tweedy letter dated July 17, 2015 X 232 848 Surrounding Property Owner — Jane Delling letter dated July 17, 2015 X 233 849 Surrounding Property Owner — Kenneth Baty letter dated July 17, 2015 X 234 850 Surrounding Property Owner — Front Range Concrete, LLC letter dated July 17, 2015 X 235 851 Surrounding Property Owner — Naranjo Civil Constructors letter dated July 17, 2015 X 236 852 Surrounding Property Owner — GLH Construction Inc. letter dated July 17, 2015 X 237 853 Surrounding Property Owner — J-2 Contracting Company letter dated July 17, 2015 X 238 854 Surrounding Property Owner — Gene & Cleo Beauprez letter dated July 17, 2015 r X 239 855 Surrounding Property Owner — Sandi Zettler letter dated July 17, 2015 X 240 856 Surrounding Property Owner — Kelly Harris letter dated July 17, 2015 X 241 857 Surrounding Property Owner — Tim Harris letter dated July 17, 2015 X 242 858 Surrounding Property Owner — Andy Pett letter dated July 19, 2015 X 243 859 Surrounding Property Owner — D. Kay Brunmeier letter dated July 20, 2015 X 245 860 Surrounding Property Owner — Danny Horn letter dated July 20, 2015 X 246 861 Surrounding Property Owner — Vicki Betton letter dated July 20, 2015 X 247 862 Surrounding Property Owner — Patricia Worrell letter dated July 20, 2015 X 248 863 Surrounding Property Owner — Gary Cooper letter dated July 16, 2015 X 250 864 Surrounding Property Owner — Albert Kester letter dated July 17, 2015 X 251 865 Surrounding Property Owner — Kevin Eskam letter dated July 17, 2015 X 252 866 Surrounding Property Owner — Kathy Kester letter dated July 17, 2015 X 253 867 Surrounding Property Owner — Jubal Kester letter dated July 17, 2015 X 254 868 Surrounding Property Owner — Susie Kester letter dated July 17, 2015 X 255 869 Surrounding Property Owner — Seth Whitlock letter dated July 17, 2015 X 256 870 Surrounding Property Owner — Bob Eiring letter dated July 17, 2015 X Page 30 of 35 257 871 Surrounding Property Owner — Dennis Kugler letter dated July 17, 2015 X 258 872 Surrounding Property Owner — Jim Lowe letter dated July 17, 2015 X 259 873 Surrounding Property Owner — Janet Lowe letter dated July 17, 2015 X 260 874 Surrounding Property Owner - Cary Lambert letter dated July 18, 2015 X 261 875 Surrounding Property Owner - Tyler Krager letter dated July 18. 2015 X 262 876 Surrounding Property Owner — Esther Block letter dated July 18, 2015 X 263 877 Surrounding Property Owner — Casey Nelson letter dated July 18. 2015 X 264 878 Surrounding Property Owner — Kester Pump Service letter dated July 17, 2015 X 266 879 Surrounding Property Owner — Doug Deter letter dated July 18, 2015 X 267 880 Surrounding Property Owner — Angie Pancost letter dated July 18, 2015 X 268 881 Surrounding Property Owner — John Sinkler letter dated July 18, 2015 X 269 882 Surrounding Property Owner — Justin Baker letter dated July 18, 2015 X 270 883 Surrounding Property Owner — Kirk Goble letter dated July 20, 2015 X 271 884 Surrounding Property Owner — Lori Horn letter dated July 20, 2015 X 275 885 Surrounding Property Owner — Ashley Betton letter dated July 20, 2015 X 276 886 Surrounding Property Owner — Debra Fillion letter dated July 20, 2015 X 277 887 Surrounding Property Owner — John Cooney letter dated July 20, 2015 X 278 888 Surrounding Property Owner — Rose Mammenga letter dated July 20. 2015 X 279 889 Surrounding Property Owner — Eric Bertoch letter dated July 20, 2015 X 280 890 Surrounding Property Owner — Jeremy Smith letter dated July 20. 2015 X 281 891 Surrounding Property Owner — John Schmidt letter dated 20. 2015 X P Y July 282 892 Surrounding Property Owner — Sara Schmidt letter dated 20, 2015 X p Y July 283 893 Surrounding Property Owner — Sarah Pierson letter dated July 20, 2015 X 284 894 Surrounding Property Owner — Carolyn Hart letter dated July 20, 2015 X 285 895 Surrounding Property Owner — Matt Everhart letter dated July 20. 2015 X 286 896 Surrounding Property Owner — Stacey Chenoweth letter dated July 20, 2015 X 287 897 Surrounding Property Owner - Jeff Everhart letter dated July 20. 2015 X 288 898 Surrounding Property Owner — Bonny Everhart letter dated July 20. 2015 X 289 899 Surrounding Property Owner — Eric Croatt letter dated July 20, 2015 X 290 900 Surrounding Property Owner — Michael Dempsey, Transpro Burgener Trucking , letter X dated July 20, 2015 291 901 Surrounding Property Owner - Leonard Kechter letter dated July 20. 2015 X Page 31 of 35 292 902 Surrounding Property Owner — Hillary A. Schafer esq letter received July 21 , 2015 X 294 903 Surrounding Property Owner — Sharon Collins MD FACS letter received July 21 , 2015 X 296 904 Surrounding Property Owner — Amy Dyer letter received July 21 , 2015 X 297 905 Surrounding Property Owner — Jesse Martinez letter received July 21 , 2015 X 298 906 Surrounding Property Owner — Kiki Martinez letter received July 21 , 2015 X 299 907 Surrounding Property Owner — Lori Horn letter received July 21 , 2015 X 303 908 Surrounding Property Owner — Alan Lee Horn letter received July 21 , 2015 X 304 909 Surrounding Property Owner — D. Kay Brunmeir letter received July 21 , 2015 X 306 910 Surrounding Property Owner — Amanda Hutchinson letter received July 21 , 2015 X 308 911 Surrounding Property Owner — Adam Mills letter received July 21 , 2015 X 309 912 Surrounding Property Owner — Mary Ann Sheetz letter received July 21 , 2015 X 310 913 Surrounding Property Owner — Marcella Lunt letter received July 21 , 2015 X 311 914 Surrounding Property Owner — Kevin Binder letter received July 21 , 2015 X 313 915 Surrounding Property Owner — Christina Dominick letter received July 21 , 2015 X 314 916 Surrounding Property Owner — Leslie C. Todrzak letter received July 21 , 2015 X 315 917 Surrounding Property Owner — Tom Haren letter received July 21 , 2015 X 316 918 Surrounding Property Owner — Janet Larson letter received July 21 , 2015 X 317 919 Surrounding Property Owner — Megan Kupec letter received July 21 , 2015 X 319 920 Surrounding Property Owner — Theodore Martinez letter received July 21 , 2015 X 320 921 Surrounding Property Owner — Ronald Tatro letter received July 21 , 2015 X 321 922 Surrounding Property Owner — Dale Henry letter received July 21 , 2015 X 322 923 Surrounding Property Owner — David King letter received July 21 , 2015 X 323 924 Surrounding Property Owner — Dan Brewster letter received July 21 , 2015 X 324 925 Surrounding Property Owner — Tim Hodsdon letter received July 21 , 2015 X 325 926 Surrounding Property Owner — Dale Horn letter received July 21 , 2015 X 327 927 Surrounding Property Owner — Sarah Hunt letter received July 21 , 2015 X 328 928 Surrounding Property Owner — Wayne Saunders letter received July 21 , 2015 X 329 929 Surrounding Property Owner — David Densmore letter received July 21 , 2015 X 330 930 Surrounding Property Owner — Dennis Holman letter received 21 , 2015 X July 331 931 Surrounding Property Owner — Kelim Community Petition letter received July 21 , 2015 X 334 932 h Surrounding Property Owner — Marcia Swanson letter received July 21 , 2015 X Page 32 of 35 335 933 Surrounding Property Owner — Dave Kisker letter received July 21 , 2015 X 336 934 Surrounding Property Owner — Stephen R. Todrzak letter received July 21 , 2015 X 337 935 Surrounding Property Owner — Catherine E. Kupec letter received July 21 , 2015 X 339 936 Surrounding Property Owner — Alan Lee Horn letter received July 21 , 2015 X 341 937 Surrounding Property Owner — Patty Mills letter received July 21 . 2015 X 343 938 Surrounding Property Owner — Amanda Hutchinson letter received July 21 , 2015 X 345 939 Surrounding Property Owner — Scott Tarbell letter received July 21 . 2015 X 346 940 Surrounding Property Owner — Emily Anderson Elder MD letter received July 21 , 2015 X 348 941 Surrounding Property Owner — Alicia Miell letter received July 21 , 2015 X 349 942 Surrounding Property Owner — Matthew Wilson Personal Statement received July 21 , X 2015 350 943 Surrounding Property Owner — Megan Lynn Nies Personal Statement received July 21 , X 2015 351 944 Surrounding Property Owner — Daniel Fredrick Nies Personal Statement received July 21 , X 2015 352 945 Surrounding Property Owner — Karen Downey Personal Statement received July 21 , 2015 X 353 946 Surrounding Property Owner — Nathan Downey Personal Statement received July 21 . X 2015 354 947 Surrounding Property Owner — Sandra L. Cole Personal Statement received July 21 , 2015 X 355 948 Surrounding Property Owner — Corey Lunt Personal Statement received July 21 , 2015 X 356 949 Surrounding Property Owner — Marcella Lunt Personal Statement received July 21 , 2015 X 357 950 Surrounding Property Owner — Denise K. Liker Personal Statement received July 21 , X 2015 358 951 Surrounding Property Owner — Wayne Achziger Personal Statement received July 21 . X 2015 359 952 Surrounding Property Owner — Sharleen Vanderslice Personal Statement received July X 21 , 2015 360 953 Surrounding Property Owner — Johnny R McCoy Personal Statement received July 21 . X 2015 361 954 Surrounding Property Owner — Cody Aab Personal Statement received July 21 , 2015 X 362 955 Surrounding Property Owner — Gertrude K Holtslag Personal Statement received July 21 , X 2015 363 956 Surrounding Property Owner — Vicky Dougherty Personal Statement received July 21 , X 2015 364 957 Surrounding Property Owner — Christina Achziger Personal Statement received July 21 , X 2015 365 958 Surrounding Property Owner — Lori Brown Personal Statement received July 21 , 2015 X 366 959 Surrounding Property Owner — Brent Brown Personal Statement received July 21 , 2015 X 367 960 Surrounding Property Owner — Robert Irizarry Personal Statement received July 21 , 2015 X 368 961 Surrounding Property Owner — Sean Carey Personal Statement received July 21 , 2015 X 369 962 Surrounding Property Owner — Keighly Carey Personal Statement received July 21 , 2015 X Page 33 of 35 370 963 Surrounding Property Owner — Todd and Frankie Luther Personal Statement received X July 21 , 2015 371 964 Surrounding Property Owner — Cynthia Irizarry Personal Statement received July 21 . 2015 X 372 965 Surrounding Property Owner — Carla Jacobson Personal Statement received July 21 , X 2015 373 966 Surrounding Property Owner — Ken Jacobson Personal Statement received July 21 , 2015 X 374 967 Surrounding Property Owner — John Iliff Personal Statement received July 21 , 2015 X 375 968 Surrounding Property Owner — Patsy Ruggles Personal Statement received July 21 , 2015 X 376 969 Surrounding Property Owner — Gerald Ruggles Personal Statement received July 21 . X 2015 377 970 Surrounding Property Owner — Barb Frank Personal Statement received July 21 , 2015 X 378 971 Surrounding Property Owner — Paul Markus Personal Statement received July 21 , 2015 X 379 972 Surrounding Property Owner — Eric Lord Personal Statement received July 21 , 2015 X 380 973 Surrounding Property Owner — Daniel Allen Lord Personal Statement received July 21 . X 2015 381 974 Surrounding Property Owner — Linda Long and Arny Long Personal Statement received X July 21 , 2015 382 975 Surrounding Property Owner — Conrad Meitl Personal Statement received July 21 , 2015 X 383 976 Surrounding Property Owner — Janice Meitl Personal Statement received July 21 , 2015 X 384 977 Surrounding Property Owner — Sue Thomas Personal Statement received July 21 , 2015 X 385 978 Surrounding Property Owner — Brad Thomas Personal Statement received July 21 , 2015 X 386 979 Surrounding Property Owner — Dustin Christensen Personal Statement received July 21 , X 2015 387 980 Surrounding Property Owner — Jamie McGill Personal Statement received July 21 , 2015 X 388 981 Surrounding Property Owner — Stacey Zander Personal Statement received July 21 , 2015 X 389 982 Surrounding Property Owner — Ben Zander Personal Statement received July 21 . 2015 X 390 983 Surrounding Property Owner — Heather Pattison Personal Statement received July 21 , X 2015 391 984 Surrounding Property Owner — Warren Pattison Personal Statement received July 21 , X 2015 392 985 Surrounding Property Owner — Michael Meth Personal Statement received July 21 . 2015 X 393 986 Surrounding Property Owner - Heather Meth Personal Statement received July 21 , 2015 X 394 987 Surrounding Property Owner — David Dirks Personal Statement received July 21 . 2015 X 395 988 Surrounding Property Owner — Randy Orr Personal Statement received July 21 , 2015 X 396 989 Surrounding Property Owner — Lynn Orr Personal Statement received July 21 , 2015 X 397 990 Surrounding Property Owner — Robert Branchflower Personal Statement received July 21 , X 2015 398 991 Surrounding Property Owner — Mary Branchflower Personal Statement received July 21 , X 2015 399 992 Surrounding Property Owner — Shay Black Personal Statement received July 21 . 2015 X 400 993 Surrounding Property Owner — Alan Black Personal Statement received July 21 , 2015 X Page 34 of 35 401 994 Surrounding Property Owner — Viola Michaelis Personal Statement received July 21 , 2015 X 402 995 Surrounding Property Owner — Jennifer Downey Personal Statement received July 21 , X 2015 403 996 Video Fly through A - attached to Accela X 404 997 Video Fly through B - attached to Accela X 405 998 Video Fly through C - attached to Accela X 406 999 Video Fly through D - attached to Accela X 407 1000 Video Fly through E - attached to Accela X 408 1001 Video Fly through F - attached to Accela X 409 1002 Video Fly through G - attached to Accela X 410 1003 CD with the CLR-34 PowerPoint Presentation - also attached to Accela X 411 1004 Hard Copy of the CLR-34 PowerPoint Presentation X 434 1005 Video from the IndianHead Subdivision and Chris Freide X 435 1006 Tabular Summary of Vehicle Counts X 436 1007 Current Peak Hour Traffic graphic X 437 1008 Staff Report with Redlines from Tetra Tech X 457 1009 Presentation from Martin Marietta — also attached to Accela X 473 1010 Response to the "Twenty Questions" from Martin Marietta X 484 1011 Stewart Environmental Response to Dr. David W. Kisker on the Air Emissions X Assessment 497 1012 Attendees and Speakers at the Planning Commission meeting from Dave Kisker email X and attachments dated July 23, 2015 499 1013 Sign in sheet for speakers at the Planning Commission hearing X I hereby certify that the one-thousand thirteen items identified herein were submitted to the Department of Planning Services at or prior to the scheduled Planning Commissioners hearing . Diana Au gst , Planner Page 35 of 35 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 10:48 AM To: tewsbob@gmail.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Robert Tews 1406 Clementine Ct. Fort Collins, Co. 80526 7/7/15 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Robert Tews EXHIBIT 1 I a July 6, 2015 Dear Weld County Commissioners, I strongly oppose USR15-0027 Martin Marietta Highway 34 Development. As a little girl I can remember driving around for hours with my parents on the weekend to look for country properties available for my parents to purchase. They always spoke of living out the rest of their lives on a piece of land that they could make their own. After years and years of saving and looking, their dream came true and they purchased the almost 100 acres at 26700 Weld County Rd 13. My father drove from Morrison, where we lived, every day for ten years to not only cultivate and farm the land but to build a barn . After his retirement, he then built by his own two hands the house my parents live in today. To say that he and my mom put their blood, sweat and tears into this property and home are an understatement! My sister, my husband and I enjoyed visiting them at their "land" as often as we could . Taking in the breathtaking views, peaceful serenity of sitting on the back porch and eating meals, and the country feel. In fact, we loved it so much that my husband and I moved to Johnstown just to be closer to them . In addition, because this piece of land had already so many memories and meant so much to us, my husband and I chose to be married there. We hoped to have this serenity and place of amazing memories last forever. Something to be cherished and handed down to our little girls. ti. . 01 tom, ors sgg Q♦ r • However, with the news of Martin Marietta's proposed asphalt plant, it changes every dimension of our parent's once sacred piece of land that they worked so hard to have. We will no longer be able to enjoy our evening out on the patio due to the distasteful view and ongoing noise. The enjoyment of family gatherings at my parent's property will be no longer existent due to the ongoing loud noise, increased traffic, and distasteful visual impact. Once a beautiful view such as these: 4- • • • ' 0,1040s EXHIBIT D (068 i will be gone forever and not something that my two little girls and our family will ever be able to enjoy again. I'd ask that you take into consideration how you would feel if Martin Marietta's asphalt, aggregate and concrete plant was coming into your backyard? Sincerely, Claire Richardson Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 9: 11 AM To: MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MM Highway 34 Support Form Maryssa Yarbrough P.O. Box 272283 Fort Collins, Co. 80527 07/08/15 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Maryssa Yarbrough EXHIBIT 1 i IjOstct_ Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 12:33 PM To: MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Mike Kintzley 1935 17th avenue Greeley, CO. 80631 7-8-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Mike Kintzley EXHIBIT 1 akin 1 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 12:31 PM To: MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Rodney Roth 1260 Honeysuckle CT Windsor, co. 80550-5600 7-8-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Rodney Roth EXHIBIT 2 1 tgat_ Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 12:28 PM To: kencollette@yahoo.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Peggy Schaffer 2724 west 15th St Greeley CO 80634 7-8-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Peggy Schaffer EXHIBIT 3 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 12:24 PM To: MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form ken Schaffer 2724 west 15th Greeley, CO 80634 7-8-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, ken Schaffer EXHIBIT 4 1 tit Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 12: 18 PM To: MMHighway34.info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Linda Schaffer 7802 West 11th st Greeley CO. 80634 7-8-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Linda Schaffer EXHIBIT 5 I taVit. Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 12: 17 PM To: MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Donald Schaffer 7802 west 11th St Greeley, CO. 80634 7-8-2015 Weld County Commissioners do Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Donald Schaffer EXHIBIT 6 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 12: 15 PM To: schafferdav@aol.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Donald Schaffer 4607 hotsprings dr greeley co 80634 7-8-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Donald Schaffer EXHIBIT 7 1 (0 (irk Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 12: 13 PM To: MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Brittany Rice 2750 west 25th st Greeley, CO. 80634 7-8-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Brittany Rice EXHIBIT 8 WOR--- Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 12: 11 PM To: MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Casey Rice 2750 West 25th st Greeley CO. 80634 7-8-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Casey Rice EXHIBIT 9 Diana Aungst Subject: FW: Martin Marietta Materials Weld County Special Use Permit - Rail operations, Asphalt Plant, Concrete Plant, Aggregate Operations EXHIBIT From: Scott Gudahl [mailto:sgudahl©jehsdv.comJ 6(aq Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 10:30 PM To: Jennifer Fuller Cc: julie.mikulas@martinmarietta,com Subject: Martin Marietta Materials Weld County Special Use Permit - Rail operations, Asphalt Plant, Concrete Plant, Aggregate Operations Please pass this letter of support on to the Weld County Commissioners for the above referenced project. Dear Commissioners — I am writing in support of the proposed Special Use Permit that MMM is seeking near Highway 34 and Weld County Road 13 for rail operations, a concrete plant, an asphalt plant, and aggregate operations. I am a part owner of a construction business, with an office in Frederick Colorado. (Weld County). We've had this office for over 7 years. We have witnessed a lot of growth in this part of Weld County, as well as continued growth along I-25 between Frederick and Ft Collins. Growth is a good thing, it provides jobs and increases tax revenues for cities, counties, and the State. In order to support growth and keep overall construction prices competitive and reasonable, construction businesses and residents need access to local construction materials. (i.e. aggregates, concrete and asphalt). This project will do just that. It will enable MMM to import aggregates via rail (most cost effective and environmentally friendly way to transport aggregates, and reduces truck trips on our roads), and provide concrete and asphalt to all of the growth and expansion projects in the surrounding areas. Having an aggregate facility, a concrete plant and an asphalt plant in close proximity to the growth areas/projects, reduces the delivery time for these products, thereby reducing the impact on roads, traffic, and air quality. The farther away their plants are from the actual construction sites, would have the opposite effect. Many of our JE HURLEY Construction projects require aggregates, concrete and asphalt products. In order to keep the final costs to our customers as competitive as possible, we need and appreciate local construction materials as the prices are less, and this savings can be passed along to the customers. I'm sure this project will generate a number of new, high paying jobs in the area. This will generate numerous benefits for this area, more real estate taxes, sales taxes, other spending to help the local economies, etc. MMM is a solid company with an excellent track record relating to all environmental issues. They have been in the business long enough to develop all of the best practices needed for a successful, long term operation. I'm sure they will invest in the highest quality plants and equipment, in order to minimize any environmental impacts. Finally, their people are top notch and have the necessary experience to not only build this project, but to run it and maintain it, going forward. They will do the "right things". Please consider these comments and vote YES for the above referenced Special Use Permit. 1 Respectfully, Scott G. Gudahl General Manager JE HURLEY Construction, Inc. Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business/8(a) Certified 2 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 9: 10 AM To: MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MM Highway 34 Support Form Dezaree Yarbrough P.O. Box 272283 Fort Collins, Co. 80527 07/08/15 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Dezaree Yarbrough EXHIBIT 1 1 00 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com} Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 12:07 PM To: janellhill521jh@gmail.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Laurie Hill 460 Redwood ave Eaton CO, 80615 7-8-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Laurie Hill EXHIBIT 1 1 Oil i Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 12:05 PM To: MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Daniel Hill 460 Redwood Ave Eaton CO, 80615 7-8-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Daniel Hill EXHIBIT (,, a Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 12:04 PM To: jimmy07usaf@yahoo.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form James McDonald 1401 Glenmere blv Greeley, CO 80631 7-8-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, James McDonald EXHIBIT 1 frill 3 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 11 :59 AM To: oceanbreeze111@hotmail.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Kelsey McDonald 1401 glenmere blv Greeley, CO 80631 7-8-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Kelsey McDonald EXHIBIT 4 1 104- Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 11 :49 AM To: thgreen55@gmail.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Tyler Green 1913 80th ave Greeley, CO 80634 7-8-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to,express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Tyler Green EXHIBIT 1 I (01)5 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 11 :45 AM To: cmlniesent@msn.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Severino Rivera Jr 1201 7th street Fort Lupton CO, 80621 7-8-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Severino Rivera Jr EXHIBIT 2 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 11 :51 AM To: MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Marty Hill 624 54th ave greeley CO, 80634 7-8-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Marty Hill EXHIBIT 3 1 (0 90 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 11 :54 AM To: mhhill6@cnturylink.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Holly Hill 624 54th avenue Greeley CO, 80634 7-8-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17 Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Holly Hill EXHIBIT 4 I 69R Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 4:45 PM To: MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MM Highway 34 Support Form daniel lockman 240 blues spruce In Loveland co 80538 7-8-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, daniel lockman EXHIBIT Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 4:40 PM To: j.mckenzie12@yahoo.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Jim McKenzie 3236 fernwood fort collins co 80525 7-8-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Jim McKenzie EXHIBIT 2 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 4:39 PM To: MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MM Highway 34 Support Form Travis King 93 Blackburn Mtn. Dr. Livermore, CO. 80536 7-8-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Travis King EXHIBIT 3 a Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 4:38 PM To: MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MM Highway 34 Support Form Tim Van Horn 4514 west county rd 54G Laporte co, 80525 7-8-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR 15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17thAvenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Tim Van Horn EXHIBIT 4 1 cola Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.comj Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 4:36 PM To: tcking228@gmail.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form pat king 93 blackberry mtn dr Livermore, CO 80536 7-8-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17 Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, pat king EXHIBIT 1 (o ?3 5 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 4:33 PM To: raptor700dan@gmail.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form david bacon 6065 North County RD 27 loveland co 80538 7-8-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17thAvenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, david bacon EXHIBIT 6 a Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 4:32 PM To: MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MM Highway 34 Support Form manuel rodriguez 215 east mulberry fort collins CO 80525 7-8-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, manuel rodriguez EXHIBIT 7 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 4:30 PM To: steelergrass@yahoo.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form gary j ackson 670 esterbrooke rd Douglas WY. 82633 7-8-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, gary jackson EXHIBIT 8 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 4:48 PM To: MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MM Highway 34 Support Form Jim Dreiling 3 904 ideal dr fort collins co 80524 7-8-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Jim Dreiling EXHIBIT 1 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 2:55 PM To: james.I.walker22@gmail.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Lyle Walker 616 north frey fort collins CO, 80521 7-8-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Lyle Walker EXHIBIT 1 8 n_ Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 11 :29 AM To: MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Arnold Burns 3109 sheridan ave loveland Co, 80538 7-8-2105 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Arnold Burns EXHIBIT 1 I 618(I Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 11 :27 AM To: kenbeatti210@gmail.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Kenneth Beattie 812 39th avenue greeley Co, 80634 7-8-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Kenneth Beattie EXHIBIT 2 I -61,0-, Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 11 :32 AM To: MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Rick Roth 1260 Honey Suckle Ct Windsor, CO 80550-5600 7-8-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Rick Roth EXHIBIT 3 1 AR t_ Case # USR 15-0027 r` FCF \fED JUL 10 2015 July 4, 2016 vvel,l Uounty Planning uepa ulleia Weld County Commissioners GREELEY OFFICE C/O Diana Aungst Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N 17th Ave Greeley CO 80631 Attn: Weld County Commissioners Re: Planning Application - USR 15-0027 - Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development Commissioners, On June 15, 2015, the town of Johnstown passed resolution 2015-07 OPPOSING Martin Marietta's application USR 15-0027. It essentially states the proposed Martin Marietta facility is not compatible with both current use and long term visions of the area . Since this area is within the city limits of Johnstown it would seem to me the town of Johnstown would have a strong voice in whether or not this application is approved . We also personally OPPOSE the approval of Martin Martietta's application . We live along County Rd 15. At our elevation we would be directly exposed to the light and noise emanating from the Martin Marietta facility. When we choose a home in Indian Head Estates one of the many deciding factors was the quality of the night sky. Being an avid amateur astronomer a dark and dust free sky is essential, both of which the Martin Marietta facility would destroy. While the occasional noise and dust from farming operations in the area is to be expected and is tolerable, the 24/7 noise, dust and light from the proposed aggregate operation is not. We ask the Commissioners to DENY Martin Marietta's application. Sincerely, aocewer_a_ tiztAwattc1-O7 William & Donna Berglin 27233 Hopi TrI Johnstown CO 80534 XHIBIT 3 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 11 :36 AM To: cmlniesent@msn.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Ruth Rivera 1201 7th street Fort Lupton, CO 80621 7-8-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Ruth Rivera EXHIBIT 5 I bet3 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 10:31 AM To: clgerretson3@comsact.net Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Charles garretson 2948 brookewood dr fort collins co 80525 7-8-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Charles garretson EXHIBI 1 t Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 10:29 AM To: sheffernan@dxpe.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form scott heffernan 330 brinn ct fort collins co 80525 7-8-2015 Weld County Commissioners do Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, scott heffernan EXHIBIT I —05— Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 10:32 AM To: MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MM Highway 34 Support Form Janet Vondy 5546 fossil ridge dr west fort collins 80525 7-8-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Janet Vondy EXHIBI 3 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 11 :57 AM To: Transtank@hotmail.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Dean Derr 1825 13th st Greeley, CO, 80631 7-8-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 EXHIBIT LI!n____Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). As a contractor who has 4 employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! 1 Sincerely, Dean Derr 2 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 2:41 PM To: cminiesent@msn.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Thomas Wertz PO box 193 pierce CO 80650 7-8-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Thomas Wertz EXHIB 1 1 166-- Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 2:26 PM To: MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MM Highway 34 Support Form Renee Somers 844 22nd street southwest loveland co 80537 7-8-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Renee Somers EXHIBIT I a2 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 1 :34 PM To: MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form shawn shanahan 520 pine dr windsor co, 80550 7-8-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17 Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, shawn shanahan EXHIBIT 1 i -900- Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.comj Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 1 :29 PM To: shanahan6@q.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Tad Shanahan 520 pine dr windsor CO 80550 7-8-2015 Weld County Commissioners c% Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Tad Shanahan EXHIBIT I got Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 1 :36 PM To: MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form john Gasperetti 2522 west 18th street rd Greeley, CO 80634 7-8-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, john Gasperetti EXHIBIT 3 1 n Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 1 :37 PM To: MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Katie Gasperetti 2522 west 18th street rd Greeley CO, 80634 7-8-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Katie Gasperetti EXHIBIT 4 n_aa Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 1 :32 PM To: MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form taylor shanahan 520 pine dr windsor co 80550 7-8-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, taylor shanahan EXHIBIT 5 Mistier Trucking, Inc 50419 County Road 21 RF- O7:1VPD Nunn, CO 80648 July 6, 2015 JUL 09 2015 Weld County Planning GejThi uncut Weld County Commissioners GREELEY OFFICE do Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Panning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, OD 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners; I am writing asa local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Fighway 34 Project (USR15-0027). As a contractor who has [1] employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will havea detrimental impact to my business and my employees We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very dose to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for thistype of project . This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commi ssioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and loci bud nesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta' s Iighway 34 Project and look forward to your response! sincerely, • reh.,,legyza 1?„ EXHIBIT Mistier Trucking, Inc (7451 Name Sharon Vavra Address PO Box 296 Address Laporte , CO 80535 Date 06-26-2015 Rrrr , vrn Weld County Board of Commissioners PO Box 758 JUL 0 9 2015 Greeley, CO 80632 wield County Planning u ;1:,, uott. , GREELEY OFFICE Dear Weld County Board of Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project. I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project. Sincerely, jalid/Y\- Name Sharon Vavra optEXHIBIT [Your Name] VZ Scott [Street Address] 1 (4 5O C I2 O [City, ST ZIP Code] 1 (Date] Lciii-ok-1 ( co �0(4 6/6/75 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027) r ' i ^ Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue JUL 0 9 2015 Greeley, CO 80631 v>reld CoLni y GREELEYni , OFF1(,E Dear Weld County Commissioners . As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027) . i understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, 9/(1// [Your Name] EXHIBIT 11701) [Your Name] Mdree31, [Street Address] Zca_c_ [City, ST ZIP Code] AgbCJ [Date] � ✓�' TrFlI r Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) 0 9 2815 Weld County Planning JULV 1555 N. 17th Avenue ,1 .1J UJ.. ,ay ► i:,ii„i, ti �: �..,, u�r��ii Greeley, CO 80631 GREELEY OFFICE Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Mar ' . ri - ghway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! iriccerely [Your Name] EXHIBIT 170 86 \aril-16014 1PF ([Your Name] [Street Address] [City, ST ZIP Code] Cofe-41 5176-171 6 [Date] te(2,05- Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027) r Weld County Planning C r \1 ' D 1555 N . 17th Avenue JULGreeley, CO 80631 JU 9 201 Weld County Planning Department GREELEY OFFICE Dear Weld County Commissioners : I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project ( USR15-0027). qq//�� dV As a contractor who has number of employees employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region . The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, XHIBI [Your Name] g D a [Your Name] J OQ9u> v 4 , Perct [Street Address] '$9lZ £ . M J ` bCrry � r -# to [City, ST ZIP Code] � r� C°11' 11 S J t [Date] ( ��r ( I G O 43d n5 Weld County Commissioners RECEIVED c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027)Weld County Planning JUL 0 9 2015 1555 N. 17th Avenue Weld County Planning Department Greeley, CO 80631 GREELEY OFFICE Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project ( USR15-0027). 7 As a contractor who has Inumber employees] employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, EXHIBIT [Your Name] /g- _r-- [Your Name] P'1r-fa Gl ' [Street Address] c2d.2%. t �1cere-btra D e-3 [City, ST ZIP Code t 5 Co 157(1-- [Date] • - R ECM/ ra D Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027) JUL 0 9 2015 Weld County Planning Weld Count Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Y n �g Department GREELEY OFFICE Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). As a contractor who has [number of employees] employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. 1 urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, EXHIBIT [Your Name] [Your Name] ..t.3 ‘() 0.-- IN A& j-4s [Street Address] (D 9 D— CA ,Q a a t [City, ST ZIP Code] r `T �� t� n u [Date] (D -- ir- Cot f { PFCSVED Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) JUL 0 9 2015 Weld County Planning 1555 N . 17th Avenue Weld County Planning Department GREELEY OFFICE Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners : I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). 3 As a contractor who has ]number of employees employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Mariett ' Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, EXHIBIT [Your Name] a [Your Name] " Apes, Se he a [Street Address] ilj1/t Case �/lt't-ry �) f/` �° [City, ST ZIP Code] 00/ar,el ra r [Date] /11 / / s- Weld County Commissioners _ rig r 9 ^ 71) c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027) , . ' r6` I 1: ,.`t Weld County Planning JULr 1555 N. 17th Avenue U 9 201! Greeley, CO 80631 Weld County Planning De;pariment GREELEY OFFICE Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). 4, As a contractor who has [number of employees] employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, €,0 `' 4 # EXHIBIT [Your Name] Iri 3 / [Your Name] �Ry.�(,(J [StreetAddress] 3ZZ � d-7'^'r,� � [City, STZIP Code] � ��.'� �w G / � , ��> /}}}J/— [Date] / 7 � «7,/ � I v `� — _ 7� V�' " C�� ' �� Weld County Commissioners , „ , �, e,.., , q r m_ . ._ , c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027) � �� , Weld County Planning it �7 n 1555 N . 17`h Avenue JiIL � 9 ?uiJ Greeley, CO80631 ; ,_'�,� � i ; hlar � i � . �,. . . � ,z ;n � �;i-:. �� f_ I_ I-`( !: i i- IC �. Dear Weld County Commissioners : I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project ( USR15-0027 ) . As a �ontractor who has jnumber of emplovees employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to o6tain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impa �t to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for �ontinued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This proje�t will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viahle. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued eronomic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and redu�ing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the 6enefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby lo�ations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Proje�t and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, � �/// EXHIBIT [Your Name] � " �� [Your Name] Øor ° ¶ vscAq;,S ��'rtc n � [Street Address) G q t Cite5nu4 SA- [City, ST ZIP Code) 5 [Date) �� c�S UJ ‘ Y\.� 501,4_, Ctb Weld County Commissioners ('" - rz tr 9 \ _' !-• .: 1 _, Y. �. .:I c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning JUL 0 9 2015 1555 N. 17th Avenue 1.Veld County Pl :miii , . �t � �;i;u,)i Greeley, CO 80631 GREELEY OFF CE Dear Weld County Commissioners : I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027).As a contractor who has [number o Imployees' employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to app . v : Marti arietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, ) EXHIBIT [Your Name] i 5 [Your Name] 1,6.40/1- Bigio [Street Address] .-ho 7 fici c5+ [City, ST ZIP Code] � () [ Date] / " �/ U/ LS g�\ ! i F. 1 Weld County aP Commi Commissioners ssio e s 'w F c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) JUL 0 9 2015 Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Weld County Planning r GREELEY OFFICEGreeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners . I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). K As a contractor who has number of employees employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region . The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While l recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, [Your Name] Sello D /070 EXHIBIT fl [Your Name] . S-C.-• Sat1/4.17- [Street Address] 15 4, i3rocjio: eA,..• Or [City, ST ZIP Code] Wti eso,' Co to Sd [Date] c Weld County Commissioners PECE ! \/TT) c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027) Weld County Planning JUL 0 9 2015 1555 N . 17th Avenue Weld County Planning Dow Uneut Greeley, CO 80631 GREELEY OFFICE Dear Weld County Commissioners . I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project ( USR15-0027). As a contractor who has [number of employees) employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region . The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, EXHIBIT [Your Name] 919 2 [Your Name] Vmc ''jl7 , \cc \So c\ [Street Address] C` W.VCc�� 4 [City, ST ZIP Code] t OTCJam- ISvic [Date] Weld County Commissioners MDc/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) s' '"' �'-•� g v Weld County Planning Jul U O 9 2015 1555 N. 17th Avenue �! Greeley, CO 80631 Weld County PlanningL De GREELEY OFFICE rlment Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, • • [Your Name] EXHIBIT [Your Name] 4pfl13e,a Tfvsx≤�3[StreetAddress] ' g'� 1J rs,p�, 1J�I NrC 1 ,,v to, S2 3 [City, ST ZI Code) "rrt , Co 2O a 27 [Date) („ a flt c Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027) FtFCF ! \) En Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue JUL 0 9 2015 Greeley, CO 80631 Weld County Planning Depdrunent GREELEY OFFICE Dear Weld County Commissioners : I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project ( USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, [Your Name] /% J7. f 4"--irtaists EXHIBIT 3 l boil I l j2,01. n , A 0.7v109 CuteL) [Your Name] `� [Street Address] ,"`� & J0a49 [City, ST ZIP Code _ g;te 1 et n r, ir F.' ri[Date] - • ..N a i JUL 09 2015 Weld County Commissioners Wcia c c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) GREELEY � 1,��; �;t OFFICE Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project ( USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, ( 1/ 544H1 W11 I if [Your Name] EXHIBIT [Your Name] 5-rcvC L. vrr2 [Street Address] /2327 [/'2A8 " Cr [City, ST ZIP Code] ThileiVrOW Co gni / [Date] 27 uv•,E 2 Weld County Commissioners ' ` ' '; ' ' ` c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning JUL 0 9 2015 1555 N . 17th Avenue Well County PI_;nnk Greeley, CO 80631 GREELEY OFFICE Dear Weld County Commissioners : I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project ( USR15-0027) . y© As a contractor who has [number of employee) employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees . We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region . The project site is located between two active railroads and very dose to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, Sri tvi Z vie i t EXHIBIT [Your Name] D D [Your Name] V"Vo' hlce6't,ydi [Street Address] Z. c)4 f is re c [City, ST ZIP Code] q ✓eotee Co 3 c)o, [Date] a 2-8 1 /� PFrFflirfl.. ... ,.� .�.C-i t 1 _ Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) JUL 0 9 2015 Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Weld County Plunru:;g „ iu, LI„,;„L GREELEY OFFICE Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). et As a contractor who has [number of employees) employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, / 4 '4r4/d 2z. EXHIBIT [Your Name] Ir � Diana Aungst From: Lloyd J. Smith [Iloyd@iloydjsmith.com] Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 5: 03 PM To: Diana Aungst Subject: Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027) . Lloyd J Smith Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage 2580 E Harmony Rd , Suite 201 Fort Collins, CO 80528 7/9/2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N . 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing as a local Realtor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027) . As a Realtor the success of my business and my clients is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for local builders/contractors to obtain the materials they need to construct homes in our area and will keep costs down and make residential home building costs lower. This in turn will enable more folks to be able to afford the American Dream of owning their own home. If these materials are not readily available, it will have a detrimental impact on housing prices which are already outpacing the cost of living increases in our area . While there are SEVERAL other economic factors that will be positively impacted as a result of the approval of this project, I wanted to express my strong opinion as it relates to the positive impact it will have on home affordability which is closest my heart, and I'm sure the hearts of hundreds of other Realtors in our community that feel the same way. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, Lloyd J . Smith Broker Associate Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage Office: (970) 223-6500 EXHIBIT Cell : (970) 449-2460 h A 1 $ Email: Lloyd@LloydiSmith.com Web: www.LloydJSmith.com ivy promise is to provide "over the top" service to my clients and to communicate honestly and ethically in all aspects of my business. 2 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 7:53 PM To: MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MM Highway 34 Support Form Tim Kuball 2150 west walnut wheatland WY 82241 7-9-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Tim Kuball EXHIBIT 1 Da_q_ Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 11 :22 AM To: serkajon69@yahoo.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Vance Kyle Somers 844 22nd Street SW Loveland Co. 80537 7-7-2015 Weld County Commissioners do Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Vance Kyle Somers EXHIBIT I -9___ZI 1 e Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 3:02 PM To: dcolomtnman@aol.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form David Reichert 809 Hi Meadow Drive Bailey, CO 80421 July 9, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, David Reichert EXHIBIT 1 1 — atiO— Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 7: 19 PM To: MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MM Highway 34 Support Form amanda billmire 3881 mount baker wellington co 80549 7-8-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15.0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, amanda billmire EXHIBIT 1 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 7: 16 PM To: MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MM Highway 34 Support Form josh billmire 3881 mountbaker wellington co 80549 7-8-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USRI 5-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, josh billmire EXHIBIT 2 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.comi Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 7:28 AM To: stelergrass@gmail.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form kenneth grass 608 riverbend dr ft. collins CO. 80524 7-9-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, kenneth grass EXHIBIT 3 1 na-9-- Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 7:29 AM To: MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MM Highway 34 Support Form lori grass 608 riverbend dr ft. collins CO 80524 7-9-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Iori grass EXHIBIT 4 __Ot%_ Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 7:30 AM To: steelergrass@gmail.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form tori grass 608 riverbend dr ft collins CO 80524 7-9-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, tori grass EXHIBIT 5n_a__ Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 8:05 AM To: Matt. Beasley@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Matthew Beasley 7133 West Virginia Ave Apt. 219 Lakewood, CO 80226 7/9/2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Matthew Beasley EXHIBIT 6 i naaic. Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 9:48 AM To: 88tandt@gmail.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form torn dikel 643 ingelside rd Laporte co, 80535 7-9-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, torn dikel EXHIBIT 7 1 313 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 9:50 AM To: 88tandt@gmaii.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form stephanie dinkel 643 ingelside rd laporte co, 80535 7-9-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, stephanie dinkel EXHIBIT 8 I 9 39 Diana Aungst From: Steph Wall [stephannwall@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 7:55 AM To: Diana Aungst Cc: deniseerl@live.com Subject: Case #USR 15-0027 Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Highway 34 Development Attention: Diana Aungst at daungst@weldgov.coin Case #USR 15-0027 For Public Record Date: Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 970-353-6100, ext 3524; Fax: 970-304-6498 daungst@weldgov.com Weld County Commissioners: EXHIBIT RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Highway 34 Development 1 935 I am writing to oppose the development of an asphalt and concrete plant that will have a HUGE negative impact on our quality of life and property values in this area of Loveland/Johnstown. The smell of asphalt is not conducive to the outdoor environment we love in this area. We need to consider the potential environmental impacts as well - noise, odor, chemicals 1 The impact on the increase of traffic along Highway 34 would be a negative effect with all the tourist, schools, medical and locals. MMM is planning to have upwards of 1200 trucks PER DAY on that road. (For anyone who's traveled this recently you know what a nightmare this would be for anyone.) Also, the amount of very long trains would increase - thus, more delays. The surrounding neighborhoods and municipalities (Johnstown, Windsor, and Greeley) are rallying behind this atrocious negative impact on this area and the Commissioners should listen to local voting constitutes who have lived in the area long before Martin Marietta. It would be better for Martin Marietta Materials to find another location further away from existing housing and retail development. There are many other alternatives in Weld County. Sincerely. Steph Wall 1783 Rhyolite Street Loveland, CO 80447 StephannWa11@Gmai1.com 970-391 -4901 2 E Case # USR15-0027 For Public Record Date: July 10, 2015 I From: Cheryl (Chris) Friede 6943 CR 56 Johnstown, CO 80534 To: Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 North 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Commissioners: I am writing to STRONGLY OPPOSE the proposed Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development plan and am asking you to vote against it. My 35 acre property borders the proposed facility. When I purchased the property in 2011, I knew I had found something very special. Spectacular, panoramic views of the Rocky Mountains, an adjoining lake, beautiful sunsets, quiet, rural setting, surrounded by great neighbors. I grew up on a farm in Kansas and I had found the perfect property where I could farm again, ride horses, and enjoy the country life . Since purchasing the property, my family and I have worked very hard and I have made significant financial investments to improve my property with a vision and a plan to renovate the 1950's Dairy Barn as a wedding/event venue. Over the past several years, I have worked closely with my architects, builder, structural engineer, landscaper, Weld County planning department, Weld County Small Business Development Center, neighbors, family and friends to prepare to launch my business, the Rockin S R Ranch. On June 17th, 2015, I reached a significant milestone; you approved my USR15-0028! I appreciate the commitment that you, as Weld County Commissioners have made to help small businesses grow and thrive in Weld County. Specifically, I am taking advantage of the Small Business Incentive Program (BIP) which you established to help reduce upfront capital outlay for small businesses such as mine. I thank you for your commitment to small business development, and for putting this program in place. In addition, as part of this program, I have worked closely with the Weld County Small Business Development Center, specifically Jenn Negiey, who has been instrumental in helping me develop a solid business plan in preparation for launching my business. These programs are extremely beneficial to businesses such as mine and truly demonstrate your commitment to small businesses. When I developed the plan for my wedding/event venue business, I anticipated the possibility of future residential/commercial development to the west of my property, consistent with the type of residential/commercial development around I-25 and Highway 34, which would be compatible with my business, However, I never imagined the heavy and concentrated industrial use that is being proposed r' for the adjoining property to the west of me. Martin Marietta's proposed plan is completely incompatible with the surrounding area, and if approved, will put me out of business. One of the main differentiators and keys to the success of my business is the serene rural setting. There is no way I can operate a successful wedding/event venue with an Asphalt and Concrete recycling plant and rail spur as the backdrop to the west, replacing the currently spectacular sunsets and picturesque views of the EXHIBIT l i l i Rocky Mountains, so critical to the success of my business. In addition to the negative visual impact, the increased noise, truck traffic, and odor will prohibit my ability to operate a successful business. , If this proposed plant is approved, it will have a substantial negative impact on the revenue generating potential of my business. According to the 2014 Wedding Market Insight Report, the average spending 1 per wedding is expected to continue at between $24.5K and $26K over the next several years. It will be i a hard sell to get couples to invest that kind of money to have their wedding at a venue featuring the ! smell of asphalt, noise from trucks and trains, traffic congestion due to significantly increased truck traffic, and picturesque 110 foot silos, piles of asphalt/concrete/aggregate, trucks and trains as the backdrop to the wedding photos they will cherish for a lifetime. Additional concerns: a In addition to the negative impact this would have on my business, and the myriad of issues that have 4 been expressed so well in the hundreds of letters already written to you, I would like to specifically I highlight a couple of these issues that are very important to me personally. C - Safety - due to significantly increased truck and train traffic. Getting on to Highway 34 at CR 15 and CR 13 is already dangerous. Add 2,000 trucks a day, plus increased train traffic and it will be a mess, not to mention the number of lives that will be lost due to traffic accidents. I'm particularly sensitive to this topic, as my dad was killed on Mother's Day, 2005 getting on to Highway 85 south of Greeley at an intersection very similar to the one at 34 and CR 15. He was on the west side of 85, El turning to go north on 85 and got broadsided by an oncoming car and was killed instantly. These intersections at Highway 34 and CR13/15 are already dangerous, and it will only get worse. - Agricultural Use - Per Chapter 22/ Policy 2-20 of Weld County Code, it is not clear how Martin Marietta's proposed facility is in compliance with this part of the code . Given that their business is not directly related to or dependent upon agriculture may explain why they do not understand the rr, value of the Prime Farmland they are removing from agricultural production_ Their following statement is inaccurate, as this land is currently producing alfalfa and has been in production for over 100 years. My land borders their proposed facility to the west and we are both currently selling our alfalfa to a local dairy who has confirmed that the quality of alfalfa on both fields is very similar, so I have firsthand experience regarding the quality of alfalfa on that piece of property. "The land being removed from agriculture has been kept in pasture grass and is not a significant generator of food product for people or animals. Therefore the agricultural land being removed ; from production would not be considered prime agricultural production land. " I In closing, I'm asking that you deny USR15-0027. Not only will the visual impact, increased noise and traffic, and odor have a significant negative impact on everyone in the surrounding neighborhoods, as i well as anyone who travels on Highway 34, this proposed plant will also prohibit my ability to operate a viable wedding/event venue business. In MMM's proposal, they evaluated other possible locations which seem to offer viable options enabling them to operate their business to support growth in Northern Colorado without negatively impacting the lives, well-being, and businesses of the currently proposed site. ' clp" 7rely AA li Cheryl (Chris) Fried 14 a I'. 1 I f r 4' -, iM I I. i • it?` 'sat a -+MI s la 41 I Sit• * lyilk6. kii, i t yrIlt r • 1St ., I. ` 1 1 r ` r a ( • • 1.41.e i (4 4LI - .It ' ; 4� ... . , • ' . V : , _ • _ �- . •,} it l d. ^�1' - , •..' ? C , ' , , a �rl�_••. PPP t . il 3 s, f w �, r r 1 1 1 . ♦ .. ti,�. ! . A$f t _� . . .. , -or 4 ,. - a W \ ,:iiir- %so 1 P i: 'il ; • ♦! r • � m f i If t r rliA • 1 ws . • . . ; , I' ill AV ii . . kw- '- , v 1 t t IC� , t �� ..a IIs , A . ...... raw I' e I „N. li:!IA .. , • lier ter , - 4 ,itti‘Stba)i 'I 1it1;; a r I ) ill' • �I # t I1 , ri T i * 'e i 1. { 'j _ 6 rl * ,. 3 er '• r 1a 1 a ji I tti I l'' - Ift 1 t r U _ _ • r I •!� 11� • std. : ., , r II i ' :• • - • ; , „�- ir el .•) ;Cr♦^•;i+ 'fa e• 1' • . I♦ 4. .1 . ,J t to r 1 , r r 3 r '�• I. .r.4R I • • ` • 6 - 1l / l 1 11 L'a ' �,t. . i' ea SiI , r .- . i • 1 " I Diana Aungst Subject: FW: Case #USR 15-0027 From: Karin Jeffrey Lawrence [mailto:gumbies.jl@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 10:42 AM To: Diana Aungst Subject: Case #USR 15-0027 July 10, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner 11 Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Diana, It took a while to get as much information as I could about the proposed 131 acre Aggregate Processing Facility that will unload after arriving on a narrow oblong railroad loop, a Recycled Product Processing Facility, an Asphalt Plant, a Ready Mix Plant, an Asphalt Cement Storage and a Fuel Storage. All of which will be the largest in the whole state of Colorado. It seems like more information is coming out about it often. I see the value of both sides of this dilemma. We do have a problem of lost resources like aggregates that need to be brought in from Wyoming. Wonder what happens when Wyoming is depleted? However, I am requesting the denial of the Use by Special Review (USR15-0027) Application submitted by Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. that would have changed our historically L1 Agricultural Zone Community to a Heavy Industrial Zone. Both, my husband Jeff & I are retired Greeley teachers with a combined 47 years of teaching the great kids of Greeley. As part of our life goals, we designed (Jeff drafted our entire home except for 1 bedroom & bath) and built a beautiful home in 2004(which happens to be about 800 feet from the proposed site). We are part of a greater community of retired folks enjoying their dream homes. We are also a "four years in the making" small salsa business, Gumbies' LI,C. It all began with Jeff s organic garden nurtured by local bee populations for over 30 years. It started as gifts for staff, friends & family. Last year we were honored to be named as a Top 25 CO Made New Business by Edible Aspen Magazine. Gumbies' legacy is that we continue our organic garden for purchase at local Farmers Markets side by side with our Gumbies' Salsa, which is now sold in over 55 stores throughout Colorado. With that background in mind, please answer my questions below: Will the offensive asphalt plant odors allow us to enjoy our 3 outdoors decks, our organic garden, our golf chipping area, our bench by our water pond, our exercise walks through our neighborhood, our west/east cross ventilation open windows that we use often, and our 20 person fire ring? (We designed & use our outdoor areas year round.) MMM current test of odor dilutes at a 7: 1 ratio. Could they change that to at least a 4: 1 ratio? Will the loud Concrete Crusher allow us to enjoy our indoor and outdoor sound quality that we have now? (We have sprayed recycled newspaper in our walls for our insulation that's been quieting noises up till now.) L13 Will the Concrete Crusher and its dust create EPA fines? Will this be expensive for MMM? (We really have lots of strong, gusting winds coming unpredictably from the proposed site.) The Greeley site has fugitive dust that coated the trailer park neighbors. What will that do to our organic garden? Do we have the right to farm? Will the screeching wheels, crashing unloading starts & stops, and vibrations of the 150 trains per year, most in the summer, resulting in a train per day for months that take 8 hours to unload create EPA fines? Will this be expensive for MMM? (This does not include all of the existing trains that travel through our community on those same tracks.) MMM is planning a Damage Fund for some homes near their proposed site. It might include us. One of the homes is being built now, but they plan on damaging it. Is that a "good neighbor"? Will the over 2000 vehicles per day that enter and leave the proposed site create a loss of access to Kelim and its existing businesses? (one with 100 employees) MMM plans on increased traffic strain on an already strained Hwy 34. (I've been in backed up traffic headed east from Co. Rd 15 all the way to Greeley many times.) Is this the best gateway to Greeley? Several viable alternative locations exist for Martin Marietta so that they can be a necessary part of this great community. Please deny the Use by Special Review (USR15-0027) Application and work toward a better solution. How would you handle this if it was your home? Sincerely, Karin E. Lawrence • Jeff & Karin Lawrence,1(ap Stumbles ' LLC Salsa d Sauce 970. 635 . 0795 GumbiesGoodies.com Designed with WiseStamp - Get yours 2 Case #USR 15-0027 For Public Record July 10, 2015 Weld County Commissioners 0/0 Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley Colorado 80631 Attn: Weld County Commissioners, Re: Planning Application- USR 15-0027- Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development Commissioners, I find myself writing a second letter to address the behavior that Martin Marietta Materials (MMM) continues to exhibit. For the record, I am adamantly against the approval of USR15-0027 for the project. I have provided an earlier letter addressing the poorly authored submission by MMM, they continue to behave indifferently to our concerns that seems to worsen as they move forward, The meetings held in Greely in late June to further inform/educate the nearby residents of the proposed project are additional indications that they simply don't care what happens to us. The only concern that they seem to have is to get the project approved, build the project and collect the revenues. It's a great business model if you don't care about people. In reviewing the mass "comment letters" provided by MMM employees, contractors and concerned parties that are in favor of the approval of the USR I would offer my take on the ballot stuffing they have performed. The comments provided from the MMM employees seem to have all the same dates. The 151h of June. I wonder if this is when MMM passed out paychecks. Is this when they passed out the "FORM LETTER" as well? It doesn't take a rocket scientist to ascertain that the letters were generated by MMM, the guise to hide the apparent dis-ingénue attempt to make the letters appear as if the concerned persons actually generated the letter is appalling. The fact that they used several methods to disguise the letters by using lower case for the first, last or both names is indicative the they were not generate by the signer (or lack of a signature) of the letter. It simply reeks of the low efforts they will stoop to further their cause. I would like to believe that the planners and Commissioners can see thru the smoke screen and consider it for what it is - garbage? We humbly request that the Commissioners vote to reject the application. It makes me wonder as to the actual effort MMM placed on the individual items of their original filing? Based on my review they were vague at the very best. If they are this elusive now just wait! ! ! Sincer / ,��7 Michael Earwood �'��C 27261 Hopi Trail Johnstown , Colorado 80534 Indian Head Estates Homeowner1IuI... 7l;7uuuIu1 I b D Diana Aungst From: Roslyn Ruppert [rozr@frii.com] Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 5:27 PM To: Diana Aungst Subject: MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS HIGHWAY 34 DEVELOPMENT Case #USR 15-0027 For Public Record July 10,2015 To : Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development Weld County Commissioners: I am only just hearing about the Martin Marietta Proposal listed above and would like to voice my opposition here. I strongly disagree with industrial growth in a residential and agricultural area such as this. Furthermore, Highway 34 cannot handle any more traffic. I own property in Greeley and travel this road regularly and the traffic situation already seems out of control. For Martin Marietta to use it's billions of dollars to strong arm this project through is not right. I trust that you will take "the peoples" consideration to heart here and not let big money be the sole influence. Roslyn Ruppert 1330 Ticonderoga Dr Fort Collins, CO 80525 rozr@frii.com © = This email is free from viruses and ma{ware because avast ! Antivirus protection is active. EXHIBIT 1939 re) 39 Diana Aungst From: prayingpam@comcast.net Sent: Saturday, July 11 , 2015 7:38 AM To: Diana Aungst Subject: Case # USR 15-0027 Citizen Concerns I am sending this email to let your office know that I am in agreement with all the others who have sent you letters and emails about the Planning Operations USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development. I hope you have gone out to this property to see for yourself why this would not be a good place to build this plant. It is not just a piece of land that is sitting there waiting for development. It is already developed with either houses that have been then for years or land and woodlands with homes for many animals. I am concerned with how this facility would affect the wildlife in Koenig Reservoir and surrounding farm land. There are many locations for Martin Marietti to build. The land up by the highway at least could be developed for housing or manufacturing. Another problem is the water contamination it will bring. We need you our officials to make wise decisions and say no to this inappropriate place to build this type of facility. Please listen to everyone who has taken the time to ask for your help on not letting Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development go through. Thank you, Pam Clark EXHIBIT I 9 40 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Saturday, July 11 , 2015 6: 11 PM To: MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MM Highway 34 Support Form Karina Yoch 5674 ridgeway dr ft Collins 7/11/15 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USRI 5- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Karina Yoch EXHIBIT 1 1 941 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2015 8: 14 AM To: joransky20-01@yahoo.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form joseph oransky 9825 east girard ave denver co 80231 7/12/2015 Weld County Commissioners do Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, joseph oransky EXHIBIT 1 I RD% Diana Aungst From: Gordon Claus [gordon.claus72@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2015 4:41 PM To: Diana Aungst Subject: Martin Marietta Materials Highway Dev Case # USR 15-OO27 For Public Record July 12,2015 To: Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development Weld County Commissioners: Please, Please, Please, do not do a disservice to your constituents, who voted you into office, by allowing your vote to be swayed by "big money". This is not a project that is in the best interest of all that live in Weld County. Highway 34 is already maxed out with traffic and I dread it each time I have to commute to Greeley for business. Furthermore, a project of this magnitude has no business being in the area that they are proposing. Again, Please save the county from this monstrosity. Gordon E Claus 1330 Ticonderoga Dr Fort Collins, CO 8O525 gordon.e.claus@gmail.com EXHIBIT 1 1r1LE3H 1) 1{3 July 12, 2015 RE: Case # USR 15-0027 For Public Record Weld County Board of County Commissioners C/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 North 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Board of County Commissioners, RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027; Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development Please accept this as my strong and formal objection to the proposed Martin Marietta Materials (MMM) development south of Highway 34 and east of WCR 13 . As a resident of the Front Range for many years I attended CSU and graduated with the dream of calling the Front Range my home. Having worked by Highway 34 both on Crossroads Blvd and FoxTrail Drive by the Outlets for many years as well as having my parents live in Indian Head Estates which is located immediately adjacent to, and at a higher elevation than the proposed site, it is both upsetting and freighting to hear of such a proposal as the Martin Marietta Materials (MMM) development. Should the facility go in this will greatly affect Front Range living as well as my families and my parent's quality of life. As a 31 year old looking to start a family, I would not feel comfortable taking my children to Indian Head Estates to visit their grandparents due to the potential odor, toxins, loud noises and traffic that Highway 34 will experience should this be approved. It is also saddening and concerning to me that my parents will have to live through these odors, toxins, loud noises and increased traffic on Highway 34 through their retirement years. After working so hard throughout their lives to support four daughters and to successfully raise them up to have good careers and families of their own, this is the thanks they receive? My parents thought they were buying a house where they could enjoy the beauty of life, fresh air that the Front Range has to offer, and a peaceful retirement. If this MMM development is approved all of that will be taken from them. They have already sacrificed so much in their lives, and it's not fair or right for them to have to move yet again or put up with these negative experiences such a development would create. My parents aren't the only ones that will be negatively affected though; all residents in this area will be along with anyone who commutes up and down Highway 34 as well as anyone's families who visit the Front Range. There is no doubt for my generation and the generations to come, that there will be a saddening sense of what this world has turned to if this development in approved. Isn't it time to tell Big Business (MMM) to take a back seat and to put this in a better suited area that is created for something like this and make the right decision for the community and residents of northern CO? This site is not conducive or compatible to the current residential/small business environment and will greatly detract and discourage any new residents from wanting to call this area home should this be development be approved. Thank you for your consideration of my request. EXHIBIT flLI Diana Aungst Subject: FW: Case #USR 15-0027 Case #USR 15-0027 For Public Record Date: July 12, 2015 Weld County Commissioners: RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Highway 34 Development I are opposed to the Martin Marietta Materials project along Highway 34. Allowing heavy industrial rezoning and development along this corridor will negatively impact traffic, people who have lived in the housing subdivisions in that area for years and discourage other types of businesses more in line with the business development along the highway. Given the amount of open land farther away from housing developments in Weld county, there are other more suitable locations. Regards, Toni Bermudez 459 Cape Dory Drive Loveland, CO 80537 EXHIBIT 1 1 9 145 Diana Aungst From: R.J. Ottaviano [rjottaviano@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 12:55 AM To: Diana Aungst Subject: Case # USR 15-0027 To the Weld County Commissioners, c/o Diana Aungst: I am writing in regards to case # USR 15-0027, and the proposed Martin Marietta asphalt plant development south of HW 34 on Weld CR 13. I am strongly opposed to this project because it is wholly incompatible with the surrounding area. My two main concerns are related to the incompatibility with surrounding farms and traffic problems. I manage a 120 acre farm located approximately 400 yards south by southwest of the proposed development site. The farm is certified organic and it is leased by Motherlove Herbal Company of Fort Collins, CO. Motherlove produces organic body care products and supplements for pregnant and breastfeeding women. Last year, we donated several thousand pounds of our best certified organic sweet corn and pie pumpkins to the Weld and Larimer Food Banks, and plan to do the same into the future. As a result of their strict quality standards, this small family company has grown over the past twenty years and their products are now being sold nationally in major retail outlets. While the farm raises organic grain crops, hay, livestock, and vegetables, our main focus is herbs. Motherlove currently leases the farm to grow several herbs that are dried and used in concentrated amounts in their products. These crops undergo strict quality testing to ensure product safety. We test for several contaminants that the asphalt plant would generate in enormous quantities. The plant will create anywhere from 50,000 to 100,000 pounds annually of airborne pollutants and contaminants. The wind blows in the direction of the farm 31% of the time. Huge amounts of pollutants will inevitably drift and be deposited on plants, soils, and groundwater. This poses a major threat to our right to farm and the future viability of the farming operation. In the state of Oregon and Rifle, CO, there are examples of asphalt plant developments being halted because of their proximity to organic farms and sensitive crops. My second concern is related to the traffic problems this project would create. The applicant completely failed to address the disastrous effects that would occur as a result of the asphalt plant. Their traffic study is full of errors and does not address the over $ 1 ,000,000 in road maintenance and public cost through traffic delays. Highway 34 cannot possibly handle the increased traffic that would result from this development and it would be extremely irresponsible to ignore this fact. There are more suitable sites with rail access for this development. The proposed development is in no way compatible with the surrounding area and would have a huge negative impact on the community. Regards, R.J. Ottaviano Farm Manager Motherlove Herbal Company 503 S. County Rd. 1 Johnstown, CO 80534 EXHIBIT 1 i 4 (9 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 9:23 AM To: MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MM Highway 34 Support Form Carol Dinkel 2100 N. overland tril Laporte CO 80535 7- 13-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Carol Dinkel EXHIBIT 1 I c7 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 9:21 AM To: MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MM Highway 34 Support Form Karen Dinkel 643 ingelside rd Laporte CO. 80535 7- 13-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Karen Dinkel EXHIBIT 1 i q_4411— Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.comj Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 9:26 AM To: MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Bob Niesent 37500 County RD 23 Severance CO 80550 7-13-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Bob Niesent EXHIBIT 194CI Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 9:27 AM To: MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Terri Niesent 37500 County RD 23 Severance CO 80550 7-13-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Terri Niesent EXHIBIT Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34. info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 9:30 AM To: dillon.n@laseroilfield.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Dillon Niesent 684 south tamera ave miliken CO 80543 7- 13-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Dillon Niesent EXHIBIT 1 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 9:31 AM To: heather112006@hotmail.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Heather Niesent 684 south tamera ave Milliken CO. 80543 7-13-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Heather Niesent EXHIBIT 1 1 —15a- Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 9:33 AM To: MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MM Highway 34 Support Form Dale Niesent 3701 cedar ct PO box 627 Laporte CO. 80535 7- 13-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Dale Niesent XHIBIT 1 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 9:34 AM To: MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MM Highway 34 Support Form Linda Niesent 3701 ceadr ct PO box 627 Laporte CO 80535 7- 13-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Linda Niesent EXHIBIT Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 9:36 AM To: tnniesent@ymail.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Tavias Niesent 3701 cedar ct PO box 627 Laporte co. 80535 7-13-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Tavias Niesent EXHIBIT 1 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 9:37 AM To: charlotteniesent@gmail.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Willard Niesent 621 yukon ct windsor CO 80550 7- 13-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Willard Niesent EXHIBIT 1 0 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 9:38 AM To: MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Charlotte Niesent 621 yukon ct windsor CO gmail.com 7- 13-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17`h Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Charlotte Niesent EXHIBIT 1 i 959 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 9:42 AM To: MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta_com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Christina Intermill PO Box 583 Ault CO 80610 7- 13-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Christina Intermill EXHIBIT 5 1 95t Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 9:43 AM To: madtrucker13@gmail.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form William Reiff 208 west 2nd st Ault CO 80610 7- 13-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, William Reiff EXHIBIT 4 1 n Diana Aungst From: MM Highway 34 Support [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 9:47 AM To: MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Steve Martin Bussiness Owner 18868 WCR 3 Berthoud CO 80513 7- 13-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 EXHIBIT I _WO_ Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). As a contractor who has 27 employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! 1 Sincerely, Steve Martin Bussiness Owner 2 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.comj Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 9:45 AM To: steve@martinandsons.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Steve Martin 8318 Annapolis DR Windsor CO 80528 7- 13-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Steve Martin EXHIBIT 3 1 nal-- Case # USR 15-0027 For Public Record July 12, 2015 Weld County Commissioners C/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Dept. of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 daungst@weldgov.com Weld County Commissioners: RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development I am strongly opposed to this USR application. Please do not let Highway 34, at the Gateway to Weld County, turn into an industrial development. - jliN , �..� .- - .7!' :__- • . i . - •rfe' _ • �► •� Y 1 j hhi I. .. v IN y it , per 1 � J 1 '7. 1 b OM il 14' AP/ 0/ i` i5 L r i 1 v.'4'Ail);I I4 NI • Common reasoning tells us that "like draws like". Once one heavy industrial plant is approved, more will follow, as is proven by the recent rezoning application case number COZ15-0001 by Enviro Tech, which abuts the Martin Marietta proposed site. This is not a "selfish" request. Any industrial development will push out any future retail, residential, or shopping in this area. Commissioners, please honor the vision of Johnstown, Windsor, and Greeley's Master Plan, and vote NO on Martin Marietta Materials HWY 34 development proposal, planning application USR 15-0027. Respectfully, Melanie Schlotter 27700 Hopi Trail Loveland, CO 80534 gmschlotter@gmschlotter.com Please acknowledge receipt of this email EXHIBIT 44 A s Case #USR 15-0027 For Public Record Date: July 13, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 970-353-6100, ext 3524; Fax: 970-304-6498 daungst@weldgov.com Weld County Commissioners: RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Highway 34 Development I am writing, because I am opposed to the Martin Marietta Materials project, to build an Asphalt and Concrete processing plant at the WCR 13 and Highway 34 location. I have friends who live directly East of this location and l feel having the plant near them will impact their quality of life and property values considerably. They have lived there for 30 years, on an acre of land . They have enjoyed the semi-rural setting and entertain, outside, often. The added dust, traffic, not to mention the smell of asphalt, will have a huge, negative, impact on them . In addition, my husband and I are members of a private lake, East of Greeley, so every week, from April 1 through October 31, we are traveling, with our camper and boat, from Loveland , East on Highway 34, to the lake. Having this plant at the proposed location will add to our, already hectic, commute. There is already so much traffic in this area and I understand there would be close to 1200 trucks per day on this road, with the MMM plant project, as well as added train traffic. This would be a nightmare, to have to deal with, as we are trying to get to our destination for a relaxing weekend ! Please take my comments into consideration and try to understand the impact this project, in this area, will be, for so many people. Surely, there is a less hectic area that would work for the project, not having to impact a large number of people. Regards, Kathy L. Hungsberg kathy.hungsberg@hp.com EXHIBIT Diana Aungst Subject: FW: Case #USR 15-0027 to daungst(c�weldgov.com July 13, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner 11 Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Diana, I'm writing this letter in OPPOSITION to Martin Marietta' proposed project USR15-0027. My wife Karin and I are long time (11 yrs) residents of Indianhead Estate West and live just 600 ft. from the 131 Acres proposed. This project is NOT COMPATIBLE to this location next to 120 plus homes and farms. The following are other concerns I have about this attempted project: - AIR QUALITY - we have a 6,000 sq. ft. organic garden and sell the produce at Farmers' Markets throughout the summer and fall . Poor air quality would compromise the crop growth and quality safety of the food. "Fugitive Dust" is a problem here. - INCREASED TRAFFIC - congestion on Hwy. 34 is already out of control - ODOR AND EMISSIONS - we wouldn't be able to enjoy the outdoors i .e. bar b que etc. - NOISE - the "wheel squeal" of the trains or the crushing and unloading of aggregate material would be devastating - VISUAL IMPACT - this project would destroy the beautiful views we have of the mountains and surrounding greenscapes. - MIGRATORY AND OTHER SPECIES OF WILDLIFE would be impacted within 2-3 miles - HIGH WATER TABLE in this area could impact ground water and run-off risks - HEALTH AND SAFETY - hazardous situations could cause a disaster - DECREASED PROPERTY VALUE - this is a fact - ask any realtor In closing, this proposed project would DECREASE THE QUALITY OF LIFE in this area and DESTROY THE LONGTERM WELFARE OF THIS REGION. Please vote NO ON USR15-0027. Sincerely, Jeff J. Lawrence 27570 Hopi Trail Loveland, Co 80534 EXHIBIT Case # USR 15-0027 Date: July 9, 2015 To: Weld County Commissioners do Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my concerns regarding the above USR request. I live in Greeley and frequently drive on Hwy 34 towards 1-25 for work, volunteer activities, shopping and to visit friends. Should the heavy industrial facility be allowed to be built, it would have a very severe detrimental impact on the entire region . Not only would the local residential area suffer, anyone who travels along Hwy34 would be negatively impacted . It absolutely is not compatible with what currently exists nor for what is planned by the surrounding communities. Having spent time as a Weed Specialist for Weld County and as a volunteer for the Rocky Mountain Raptor Program, I have had a chance to drive and walk all over Weld County inspecting and viewing different areas. The area along the Thompson River just south of the proposed facility remains an important corridor for farming and for wildlife. Subjecting them to the increased air, light and noise pollution in addition to the heavy truck traffic will be devastating and cause irreparable harm to a wildlife population that is already struggling to survive in our quickly developing county and for the local farmers in this prime farmland region. Please consider the impact that your decision will have on present and future generations and do not approve of the above USR. Sincerely, Christine Thomas Greeley, CO 80631 EXHIBIT Case # USR 15-0027 For Public Record July 12, 2015 Weld County Commissioners C/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Dept. of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 daungst@weldgov.com Weld County Commissioners: RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development We live in the Indianhead Estates West neighborhood. Our home is in the direct line of sight to the proposed industrial development. We ask that you vote noto this proposal. In spite of the financial power and might of Martin Marietta Materials, our neighborhood (and surrounding neighborhoods) are just a group of Weld County citizens looking to you to be the great equalizers as our "kinsman-redeemer". This proposed industrial development is incompatible for the Hwy 34-County Road 13 area for the following reasons: The increased heavy burden of traffic on Highway 34: As acknowledged by a Martin Marietta consultant, David Stewart, on the June 9th public meeting, he stated (We quote him as saying); "Highway 34 already has tremendous traffic". Highway 34 is designed as an Expressway. This proposal would be contrary to planning with increased rail and truck trips. The proposed stop light at County road 13 would put "tremendous" delays on traffic flow. Farmlands of National Importance: This is taken off the Weld County web site in reference to farmland where the industrial site is proposed. One writer in support of the Martin Marietta plant stated "the land was not good for anything else, so it might as well be an asphalt plant." We would like to respectfully remind the Commissioners to remember the rich agricultural heritage of our county. For the useless land comment we would ask, do they know where their food comes from? Health Concerns of neighborhood residents: Martin Marietta has not addressed our questions, have been misleading and vague concerning their statements on air quality, pollution, emissions, odor, noise and dust. Current industrial Sites. We understand Martin Marietta has considered other locations in currently zoned industrial corridors that have rail access. We also understand there is a need for this type of plant within the county, but why next to existing residential? Yes, we were here first! ! ! Respectfully, Glenn and Melanie Schlotter 27700 Hopi Trail Loveland, Co 80534 gmschlotter@gmschlotter.com Please acknowledge receipt of this email EXHIBIT r Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 8: 17 AM To: jboyhelm@yahoo.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Jason Helm 621 colbey ct windsor co 80550 7- 14-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Jason Helm EXHIBIT 2 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 8:28 AM To: MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MM Highway 34 Support Form Tim Kuball 2150 West Walnut Wheatland WY 82241 7-14-2015 Weld County Commissioners do Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Tim Kuball XHIBIT 1 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 8:38 AM To: darrenbucklen66@gmail.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Darren Bucklen 415 north 21st ave greeley co 80631 7- 14-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Darren Bucklen EXHIBIT 3 I 1 (f) Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 8:40 AM To: dgerk32@gmail.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Dave Gerk 102 north 55th ave greeley co 80634 7-14-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Dave Gerk EXHIBIT 4 I ti --0 - Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com} Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 8:42 AM To: jaebane@hotmail.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Jacob Benson 576 palisade mtn. dr windsor co 80550 7-14-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17 Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Jacob Benson EXHIBIT 5 1 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 8:44 AM To: ggordan27.gg@gmail.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Garrett Gordon 4129 west 30th st rd greeley co 80634 7- 14-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Garrett Gordon EXHIBIT ITQ 71eZ 6 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.comj Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 8:46 AM To: MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form christopher parker 455 buckeye ave eaton co 80615 7-14-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, christopher parker EXHIBIT 7 225____ Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 8:48 AM To: harley1036@msn.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Harlan Uttenbogaard 1036 indian trail drive windsor co 80550 7- 14-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Harlan Uttenbogaard EXHIBIT 774___ Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com) Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 8:51 AM To: acoulter8560@yahoo.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Aaron Coulter 3509 columbine ct evans do 80620 7- 14-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Aaron Coulter EXHIBIT 175 9 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 8:54 AM To: MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Jose Garcia 455 buckeye ave eaton co, 80615 7-14-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Jose Garcia EXHIBIT en 49 10 Diana Aungst From: Wilma Wadsworth Andrews [hlawja@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 9: 12 PM To: Diana Aungst Subject: Letter to Weld County Dear Weld County Commissioners, As a former Weld County Deputy Sheriff and Sheriff of Weld County for seventeen years and as a fifth generation native born Weld County Coloradoan we have a long-term vested interest in seeing the county be safe, prosperous and good place to live for our friends and families. The proposed Martin Marietta heavy industrial operation will not serve the community well at its currently proposed location for a number of reasons. We respectfully request that their USR be denied. We served the county citizens from both a law enforcement public servant perspective and for 40 years as a family business selling furniture to fill homes in our community. From a business owners perspective it is important • to have safe roads to bring customers to your place of business. If you make it difficult for people to travel into the Greeley/Evans area it will reduce your opportunity to make a sale. As one committed to keeping a community safe, you need to have proper infrastructure to provide safe travel on the road systems and ensure that development does not overly burden the roadway systems. By permitting over 1100 trucks per day to enter CR 13, CR 54 and Hwy 34 people will be forced to use alternative routes, thus impacting roads in a much larger area. By allowing heavy industry to move next to a well established residential neighborhood you would also be setting up an incompatible situation that will create problems for all parties involved. Responding to accidents and neighborhood complaints will cost the county tax payers as well as set a bad precedence. It seems that the property tax revenue from the industrial operation and jobs created would be much less than the value generated from nearly any other use on this property. Turning the gateway from the west into Weld County into a traffic congested mess with heavy truck traffic, along with a less-than-desirable scenery is not in the best interest of the citizens of Weld County. Sincerely, Harold and Wilma Andrews EXHIBIT 1 a Diana Aungst From: Kathy Hingtgen [goattoots@aol.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 0112015 11 : 18 AM To: Diana Aungst Subject: Fwd: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development Hello Ms. Aungst (Re:Case # USR 15-0027 For Public Record Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services Weld County Commissioners: RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development) I feel very strongly that MMM should cease their consideration of the above- mentioned property. Due to the fact that it is very close to a highway, many local businesses--and most importantly a healthy, happy and thriving neighborhood--Martin Marietta can show great respect for this are of Weld County and build on a more appropriate piece of land. A considerable decrease in the quality of life would ensue for all areas mentioned above. Specifically, Northern Colorado Rehabilitation Center Hospital, just West of the proposed MMM site, would lose its sense of calm and quiet. This would be a great loss for those clients / patients struggling to regain their normal lives following surgery and injury. Thank you for listening, Kathy Hingtgen EXHIBIT 1 I us? 4) a Diana Aungst Subject: FW: Case #USR 15-0027 Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Highway 34 Development Attention: Diana Aungst at daungst@weldgov.com Case #USR 15-0027 For Public Record Date: Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 970-353-6100, ext 3524; Fax: 970-304-6498 daungst@weldgov.com Weld County Commissioners: RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Highway 34 Development I am writing to oppose the development of an asphalt and concrete plant that will have a HUGE negative impact on our quality of life and property values in this area of Loveland/Johnstown. The smell of asphalt is not conducive to the outdoor environment we love in this area. We need to consider the potential environmental impacts as well - noise, odor, chemicals The impact on the increase of traffic along Highway 34 would be a negative effect with all the tourist, schools, medical and locals. MMM is planning to have upwards of 1200 trucks PER DAY on that road. (For anyone who's traveled this recently you know what a nightmare this would be for anyone.) Also, the amount of very long trains would increase - thus, more delays. The surrounding neighborhoods and municipalities (Johnstown, Windsor, and Greeley) are rallying behind this atrocious negative impact on this area and the Commissioners should listen to local voting constitutes who have lived in the area long before Martin Marietta. It would be better for Martin Marietta Materials to find another location further away from existing housing and retail development. There are many other alternatives in Weld County. Sincerely, Steph Wall 1783 Rhyolite Street Loveland, CO 80447 StephannWall@Gmail.com 970-391 -4901 EXHIBIT 1 I 7 jCi June 22, 2015 Case # USR 15-0027 For Public Record To: Weld County Commissioners C/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development Weld County Commissioners: Dear Commissioners, Thank you for taking the time to read this. PLEASE do not allow for the development of the proposed asphalt and cement plant. My mother-in-law and father-in-law have dumped everything that they have in their "dream home" which would border the proposed plant. If construction of the plant moves forward, their dreams of retirement would be crushed as their home value would plummet. The re-sale value of their home is a planned major source of funds for their retirement. The reason they (and I'm sure many others) moved to Indianhead Estates was for the privacy and beautiful mountain views. A loud, industrial plant as a neighbor would ruin everything that makes the neighborhood great. It is an ideal plot of land, but surely MMM can find property elsewhere that won't affect the well-being of so many residents. Johnstown does not want to be known as "the little town with the big asphalt/concrete plant." Asphalt, aggregates, and concrete are necessary for the growth of our local economy but it shouldn't come with the price of ruining the welfare of so many honest, hard working families. As a construction manager, I see the value this plant could bring to the economy and my industry, but anyone with an ounce of ethics/values has to realize that the benefits do not outweigh the cons with this particular proposed location. PLEASE do not allow for the development of the plant. A concerned and nervous Johnstown resident, -Rich Hanzel EXHIBIT . • r ' • 1 • ' • • • - • ll 2/486 County Roach 13 / lowland, Colorado 80534 office 9/0. 669 1463 / fax 970. 669, 1964 rr July 1 , 2015 f Developing A Common Future Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 North 17"` Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am the owner of 42 acres in Weld County and have another parcel of ground under contract, which is adjacent to my property. I have entered into a lease agreement with Martin Marietta for all of that land, along with the improvements, including the 42 acres which is permitted under a Weld County USR. I received a copy of the referral letters from the jurisdictions that surround my property and as a property and business owner in both Weld County and Johnstown, I take strong exception to the contents of the Johnstown Resolution opposing the Martin Marietta facility. I had not wanted to weigh in on this proposal as the landowner, but I felt Johnstown's Resolution was extremely disingenuous, misleading and damaging to me as a property owner. Please consider: - The 42 acres I own in Weld County was approved by the Weld County Commissioners for its current USR which has allowed us to operate an industrial-type use on the property for over eight years. Johnstown apparently doesn't recognize Weld County's land use decisions and feels that the USR for my property, which has been approved by the Weld County Commissioners for a use which is consistent with Martin Marietta's proposed use, is not legitimate as it was never mentioned in their Resolution and is not addressed anywhere in their Comprehensive Plan. - The Iron Horse development in Johnstown, which lies between this Weld County property and my property in the 2534 commercial development ( which is within the Johnstown municipal boundaries), has an approved outside storage, rail-served, heavy industrial use, In approving that use, Johnstown forced the user to access highway 34 through 2534 with heavy industrial truck traffic to avoid making improvements to Larimer County 3 . This heavy truck traffic passes through an area with three surgery centers, a rehab hospital, a behavioral health hospital, a retail center and a housing development with several hundred homes. The trains that serve this Johnstown site must cross and block highway 34 and CR 13, and at times they travel along tracks that are within a hundred feet of Johnstown residences. In the past, Johnstown seems to have had no compatibility issues and found nothing "offensive" about mixing heavy industrial uses with other uses when the industry produces revenue within their own jurisdiction. - Johnstown has approved the construction of over 1,300 homes, just two miles away, that surround a permitted gravel mine along the Big Thompson River east of I-25. Johnstown EXHIBIT approved the development of these homes in Thompson River Ranch, fully aware that mining will occur along with the possibility that an asphalt plant could be set up in the very center of a residential community which will surround the mine on three sides. These operations will be as close as 100 feet from some of the residences and yet the Town didn't seem to fund that mix of use inconsistent or offensive when they approved the development. - In that same area, Johnstown has approved the construction of several hundred homes that will surround the Johnstown Low Point Sewage Treatment plant. Apparently, Johnstown doesn't find sewage treatment offensive to residents who will live within a few hundred feet of those facilities when they're within their own jurisdiction - or when Johnstown owns the sewer plant. As a major stakeholder in Jolnstown's future with millions of dollars invested in Johnstown's northern annexation area and my ownership of a significant portion of the 2534 commercial development, I strongly disagree with the Town's "not in my back yard" Resolution. The highly paid employees that this facility will bring to the area will buy homes in Weld County and Johnstown, spend money in stores and restaurants and pay taxes. I not only believe these mixed uses can coexist, I believe they must coexist if we are to have economically strong, self- supporting communities. If you look at Johnstown's land use decisions over the past several years, you'll see that by their own actions, they agree. As a developer, I'm used to getting resistance to any proposed change from neighbors and nearby communities. I welcome constructive criticism for all of my projects as I did for the properties we annexed into Johnstown —such criticism makes the projects better. However, Johnstown's Resolution is based on incorrect information and false assumptions. It assumes that mixed uses can't coexist outside of Johnstown's jurisdiction and that our land, which has several million dollars of industrial improvements on it, will somehow change to single family homes. The natural reserves of aggregates in this area may be nearly depleted, but demand continues to grow. If this facility is pushed further outside this area, the number of trucks and truck-trips it will take to get these products to their customers will increase exponentially, multiplying the very effects on traffic and pollution Johnstown says it's opposing. And, regardless of Johnstown's long range plans for my Weld County property, I have no intention of changing it to residential use. Thank you for your consideration of these facts as you make your recommendations. Sincerely, fa/ President, Gerrard Companies cc: Roy Luricello Jolm Franklin David Hagerman 27381 Hopi Trail Loveland, CO 80534 June, 29, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner H Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N . 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 RE : Planning Application USR 15 - 0027 : Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development Weld County Commissioners : I am writing you to petition that you disapprove the above USR application from Martin Marietta (MM) . The proposal is not good for Weld County for the following reasons : 1 . It is not compatible with the surrounding area. This area is agricultural and residential land with residential housing directly next to the proposed MM location. This is a peaceful rural area, with no other existing land users compatible with this proposal . 2 . Highway 34 traffic is already very busy. It is unconceivable how this new truck traffic proposal by MM could be managed into highway 34 without major impacts to traffic flow on 34. EXHIBIT 3 . As a resident in Indian Head Estates, which is just to the east of the proposed MM site, I am very concerned with the noise and odor pollution that the MM site would generate. It is hard to imagine that the Martin Marietta's business of supplying aggregate product, concrete, and asphalt at this site would not dramatically change the quality of life in Indian Head Estates as well as the surrounding community. 4. This west side of Weld County has seen notable development over the past few years, with light industry/warehouse, residential, and retail additions that compliment each other. Just across the county line into Larimer County, hospitals, banking, and retail are expanding robustly. Adding MM 's concrete and asphalt site in the middle of this setting would be totally out of the development direction this area has been on. Please deny in total Martin Marietta's proposal. Only this action by your commission will continue your insightful planning direction for West Weld County. Sincerely yours, Gary Mattson garym7890@gmail. com Diana Aungst From: Esther Gesick Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 5:21 PM To: Diana Aungst Cc: Bruce Barker; Steve Moreno; Cherry.Smith@adamsonchapels.com; Tisa Juanicorena; Karla Ford Subject: RE: helping a friend re: Martin Marietta Diana, Please include the correspondence below as a PC Exhibit. Thanks ! Esther E. Gesick Clerk to the Board 1150 O Street/P.O. Box 758/ Greeley, CO 80632 tel: (970) 336-7215 X4226 I ni f- 1I 61Ir. r Confidentiality Notice: This electronic transmission and any attached documents or other writings are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify sender by return e-mail and destroy the communication. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action concerning the contents of this communication or any attachments by anyone other than the named recipient is strictly prohibited. From : Steve Moreno Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 4:03 PM To: Cherry.Smith@adamsonchapels.com Cc: Esther Gesick; Bruce Barker Subject: RE: helping a friend re: Martin Marietta Cherry, I am sorry but cannot comment as the BOCC serves in the role of quasi-judicial. Thanks, Steve Moreno Weld County Commissioner At Large 1150 O Street PO Box 758 Greeley CO 80632 Phone: 970-336-7204 Ext. 4207 Fax: 970-336-7233 Email: smoreno@co.weld.co.us Website: www.co.weld.co.us r p EXHIBIT 1 D Confidentiality Notice: This electronic transmission and any attached documents or other writings are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify sender by return e-mail and destroy the communication. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action concerning the contents of this communication or any attachments by anyone other than the named recipient is strictly prohibited . From: Moren04 [mailto: moren04@aol.com] Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 8: 18 AM To: Steve Moreno Subject: Fwd : helping a friend re: Martin Marietta Original Message From: Cherry Smith <Cherry. Smith@adamsonchapels.com> To: 'moren04@aol.com' <moren04(a aol.com> Sent: Mon, Jul 6, 2015 10:35 am Subject: helping a friend re: Martin Marietta Hi Steve, I hope you are off to a good week! I bet your 4th holiday was really busy. I have some dear friends of over 30 years, Denny and Barb Moe. They live across the street from where Martin Marietta is proposing to build an asphalt plant. It seems reasonable that this is not the only location possible for an asphalt plant. Barb, Denny and their neighbors have been very frustrated with the process. Evidentially employees from Martin Marietta have been writing to our commissioners posing as neighbors, which has bent the numbers in favor of the plant. In reality, none of the neighbors are in favor of the plant. The Moes feel like they have no voice with their leaders. The letter that Denny wrote still does not show as received. Would you be willing to give Barb or Denny a call to visit with them about their concerns? I talked with Barb and told her that I would be talking with you. She was very happy at the thought of getting to talk with you. . . to be heard . I meant to call you, but thought an email would be more to your convenience. These are good people, who have worked hard to build up their property. I leave it in your good hands, Steve. Here are their numbers: Barb - Denny - Tell Joyce I said "hi". =) Take care. Cherry 2 Diana Aungst From: MM Highway 34 Support [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 7:57 PM To: MMHighway34.info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Mike Urban 2448 Brehm Rd. Berthoud, CO 80513 July 13, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 EXHIBIT Dear Weld County Commissioners: I nr_ I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). As a contractor who has 1 employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! 1 Sincerely, Mike Urban 2 Diana Aungst From: MM Highway 34 Support [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 9:43 PM To: MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form King Contracting, Inc. % Randal F. King 1564 Taurus Court Loveland, Colorado 80537 7-14-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Ilta_ EXHIBIT • a B Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). As a contractor who has 5 employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! 1 Sincerely, King Contracting, Inc. % Randal F. King 2 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 8: 13 AM To: jleyvatrilc2@qwestoffice.net Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Jesus A Leyva 336 Walnut Drive Frederick, CO 80530 7/15/2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 EXHIBIT nN__. Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). As a contractor who has 5 employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! 1. Sincerely, Jesus A Leyva 2 Diana Aungst Subject: FW: Case # USR 15-0027 Attachments: Life In Indianhead Estates2.jpg Case # USR 15-0027 For Public Record July 13, 2015 Weld County Planning Commission c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 970-353-6100 ext 3524; Fax: 970-304-6498 daungst@weldgov.com Weld County Planning Commission: RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development Dear Commissioners, I oppose the approval of USR 15-0027 and ask that it be denied. The reason is that our community will suffer undeniable environmental change thereby impacting our quality of life. Martin Marietta Materials has imbarked on a campaign to make the whole of WELD county believe that their presence will benefit all and do no harm to the community all under the guise of being a "Good Neighbor." The plant will pollute, smell, cause illness , shake our ground, wake us up, block the sound of birds with their diesel motors and squeals of train wheels and will disrupt our outdoor life in general. Perhaps Martin Marietta Materials believes that we in this neighborhood are old and have retired to our homes and will not notice or mind this environmental disaster. Not SO! On walks with my family, I have taken snapshots of neighbors, old and young, enjoying the wonders of Colorado outdoors in our neighborhood. I have attached many of these as evidence of their miscalculation. Martin Marietta, move your industry away from our neighborhood like a true "Good Neighbor" would! You are not compatible! Fortunately we have entrusted our elected officials to respect our health and welfare! Commissioners, PLEASE deny this application! Respectfully, Olga Wallace 27657 Blackfoot Road Indianhead Estates Subdivision olgawallace43@gmail.com EXHI T 1 • • •,p'; - li o . • t 1 A� .. 3 0 .. _ i ` y ar ( w I' r lip • rata ..alt 4 ra • a • ilaiirliggli eiAtelip•blit - • 84tt • lit ' r ~ i. IIfr i t - iii .44,,, . . _ d , spy iimi ,i II it • e I iii • 7P1 Or a • A, y i l , vs is 1. . • ,* . ii Al Ilk 41 s - INNS 4. ••• a _ I ell 11 ` - 1 ' ,� i sr `. 1t : -it < •• 11 7C. I '- ,`t • S. .•. I'a r• 1 _r ;e. it.1/4 ..0 r.. tviii el al a - 45,0 ...1 I t....4 . 1 .. '' *.i. 40. • G. . , snci . .• 4:__ • •1106 • VII ► s.`t o, 1 - • _ — � . fir • ...... • . • Imo\ , _ • ~ �_ __ • ��•. lii: ` r _r" �. W i•allt+J ..•♦,F ,- - _ . . • . N • 1 lip 1 I • 111 ' r . it. IS . ..._ . • j'ires 1; t ~ t 'iillb. a it 1 )04 rill 7 . It / µ . ♦ _ •16. Writ art i M r ,w > • r - Ir. _ MN -oiltf . t r 441• _. ife. ir . , `t1 tit-- ,..,,., ._ . ,. .. .. , „..._ . ,..,---- . i • . �t 'i �.,• { 1 r•• Star t i • -Is tir. rillinrgiSCVignititt.t .. .. .. _. 1 % t 7 - t .1 V ft-till:4N, , • , . , . i . ...., , . , . . 4,„ 41 .os • 1 * I . • I'► • - • t t am° .. 0, 40 •-• - .IP J . gait_4 4,„ - I I • sere • , - Ilf it it iii ir• 4 11114 lini? - • . •t 1 �� J ( ' like — alit ...` .- '111. 01 . 4 ` 1,,it t try .. . illiaillibilliblirn 1T. lad II 61 1.- ailimit. t - T _ p• •• .4 `• ^ . . • • t l -• • • r • 4 ; i ` • • i 1 _ ' • a '� . ' j �� .--.. „. �. I • • 0 • ;. -•ia ,r .a I lT ` _ . •. k I pi. t1/41 r s a — A. t, 4 • _ , r It • - •. T• 1 • - I , • 401' jil—ans—aaaa41.\it Jr .. . r 41 iiiiiiiNitiiiia I • i w ill - > - - -aa .,.... •••.1 --•••• •-••at f c r y \_ Vij a. illk 1 r . re". , , - . . . Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 9:00 AM To: MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Kris Gorman 1221 MacKay Ct Dacono Colorado 80514 7- 15-15 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Kris Gorman EXHIBIT 1 1 abl_. Diana Aungst From: Ron Pernicka [kayaks4me@Ipbroadband. net] Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2015 4:31 PM To: Diana Aungst Subject: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development Project Weld County Commissioners: RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials (MMM) Highway 34 Development I am a resident of Indianhead Estates, which is adjacent to the proposed MMM project site. The proposed facility that Martin is planning at this location will adversely affect our neighborhood and will be a nuisance to our current standard of living in Weld County. We enjoy spending time on our deck and patio enjoying the fresh country air and views of the front range, but the proposed asphalt plant would definitely change all that. The engine noise from long trains unloading 120 cars at all hours of the day and night will make using our outdoor living areas unpleasant. The associated noise and odors from an asphalt manufacturing plant nearby will also degrade our enjoyment of being outside in our yards. The increased heavy truck traffic on County Rd 13, Highway 34, and other nearby roads from the estimated 1000 to 2000 vehicles trips to the plant will make driving through those intersections more hazardous for us. For these reasons, I strongly oppose allowing this location for the MMM project site. Ron Pernicka 27848 Arikaree Rd. Johnstown, CO 80534 kayaks4me(cc�lpbroadband. net EXHIBIT 1 Case # USR 15-0027 May 22th, 2015 For Public Record Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II 1555 N 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 970-353-6100 ext. 3524 daungst@weldgov.com Weld County Commissioners: RE: Planning Application USR 15_0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development I am concerned about USR 15 0027 for the following reasons. Noise, traffic and odor. 1) Noise: It is unlikely that the MMM Noise Analysis calculations are adequate to use as a basis for approval given the small margin of error. Occasional nighttime limitations may exceed the limit at R4A, R4B and R5. Allowing noise to EVER exceed the residential limit is not acceptable. There is no mention of vibration from trains and heavy trucks, which will be just as important to quality of life. There also stands to be constant wheel noise, banging of cars as trains stop and start, as well as train whistles. 2) Traffic: The immediate impact from the number of vehicle trips and eventual doubling of vehicle trips to as many as over 2200 per day with the majority being heavy trucks is NOT typical use and will cause added road repair at taxpayer expense. This increase in heavy truck traffic causes safety concerns, reducing traffic flow rate and causing additional traffic congestion. There is already significant traffic safety concerns regarding current traffic on county road 13 and surrounding county roads to children at school bus stops, motorcycles, equestrians, pedestrians and farming operations. This increase in heavy truck traffic also adds to the noise concerns listed previously. Night time operations bring additional safety concerns to the area. This increase in traffic occurs 24 hours per day, 7 days per week and 365 days per year. Increased train traffic will cause delays on Highway 34, Weld County Roads 13, 15, and 56, Highway 402 and Larimer County Roads 1 and 3. All of this will have a major impact on the quality of life in the area, which is unacceptable and intolerable. EXHIBIT 3) Odor: MMM admits this operation will be odorous though they claim it will be safe. They claim to employ "odor rangers". This seems as a ploy to merely document "compliance." Simple compliance with standards is NOT sufficient to demonstrate compatibility. Individuals, especially those with sensitive disorders are likely to be affected. It is nearly impossible to determine that odor emissions will NEVER cause a problem to the surrounding community. The quality of life impact of the odors can potentially be severe. This is an overview, without great detail, of the reasons that I am concerned and very much against the Consideration of the MMM Highway 34 Project. Thank you for your careful consideration of this proposal and those directly affected by the impacts, which will adversely affect the quality of our lives. t--(-4---L-ity _A C. -11“,....n4 Shirley Schwalm 27505 Hopi Trail Johnstown, CO 80534 Case tt USR 15-0O27 May 22t, 2015 For Public Record Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II 1555 N 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 8O631 97O-353-61OO ext. 3524 daunW@weldgov.com Weld County Commissioners: RE: Planning Application USR 15_0O27: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development I am concerned about USR 15 _0027 for the following reasons. Noise, traffic and odor. 1) Noise: It is unlikely that the MMM Noise Analysis calculations are adequate to use as a basis for approval given the small margin of error. Occasional nighttime limitations may exceed the limit at R4A, R4B and R5. Allowing noise to EVER exceed the residential limit is not acceptable. There is no mention of vibration from trains and heavy trucks, which will be just as important to quality of life. There also stands to be constant wheel noise, banging of cars as trains stop and start, as well as train whistles. 2) Traffic: The immediate impact from the number of vehicle trips and eventual doubling of vehicle trips to as many as over 2200 per day with the majority being heavy trucks is NOT typical use and will cause added road repair at taxpayer expense. This increase in heavy truck traffic causes safety concerns, reducing traffic flow rate and causing additional traffic congestion. There is already significant traffic safety concerns regarding current traffic on county road 13 and surrounding county roads to children at school bus stops, motorcycles, equestrians, pedestrians and farming operations. This Increase in heavy truck traffic also adds to the noise concerns listed previously. Night time operations bring additional safety concerns to the area. This Increase in traffic occurs 24 hours per day, 7 days per week and 365 days per year. Increased train traffic will cause delays on Highway 34, Weld County Roads 13, 15, and 56, Highway 402 and Larimer County Roads 1 and 3. All of this will have a major impact on the quality of life in the area, which is unacceptable and intolerable. EXHIBIT qcit 9 3) Odor: MMM admits this operation will be odorous though they claim It will be safe. They claim to employ "odor rangers". This seems as a ploy to merely document "compliance? Simple compliance with standards is NOT sufficient to demonstrate compatibility. Individuals, especially those with sensitive disorders are likely to be affected. It is nearly impossible to determine that odor emissions will NEVER cause a problem to the surrounding community. The quality of life Impact of the odors can potentially be severe. This is an overview, without great detail, of the reasons that I am concerned and very much against the Consideration of the MMM Highway 34 Project. Thank you for your careful consideration of this proposal and those directly affected by the impacts, which will adversely affect the quality of our lives. j0,7€12- Lloyd Schwalm 27505 Hopi Trail Johnstown, CO 80534 Diana Aungst Subject: FW: Martin Marietta Materials proposal From: Taunya Feyen <tfeyen@me.com> Date: May 28, 2015 at 5 :30:46 PM MDT To: Barbara Kirkmeyer <bkirkmeyer@co.weld.co.us> Subject: Martin Marietta Materials proposal Case #USR 15-0027 For Public Record May 28, 2015 EXHIBIT Commissioner Kirkmeyer CrtaVia email address: bkirkmeyer@weldgov.com RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development Dear Commissioner Kirkmeyer, I am writing you this letter today to express my concerns and extreme opposition regarding the development of the Martin Marietta Materials plant proposed along Highway 34 between Weld County Roads 13 and 15. I will begin first by stating that for the simple purpose of this location being a "prime" location for Martin Marietta Materials should not be relevant in any manner. This type of facility should not be imposed upon all of the families whom have chosen this area to live, to build their dream homes and/or to retire to. They have chosen this area for the serenity, for the wonderful views, for the "country-living" lifestyle. The proposed Martin Marietta Materials site is zoned for agricultural purposes, not heavy industrial purposes. Yes, it can be argued, that Gerard's is in this area already, but they are construction and their impact on this area can in no way be compared to the hazardous monstrosity of the proposed Martin Marietta Materials facility. There are so many issues to be discussed and considered surrounding this I don't even know where to start, so I will begin with my biggest concern for my family, and that is the effects of such a facility on human health. We are a young, healthy family with three children. Our intentions are to live in our dream home, to grow old and remain as healthy as possible. I do not believe that there has been enough research addressing the issue of the long-term cumulative effect on human health in relation to the toxins that are emitted into our air by facilities of this sort. It honestly scares me to think about the risk of my families immediate and future health. One of the key responsibilities you have as a County Commissioner is to provide for the protection of the general health and welfare of County residents. Allowing this type of heavy industrial plant in our "neighborhoods" is in complete opposition of that responsibility. Asphalt plants were considered "major" polluters up until a decade ago and have since tried to sell us on them being only "minor" polluters. I'm not educated enough to fully understand the difference between and "major" and a "minor" polluter, but isn't a polluter still a polluter? These types of facilities should be built far away from populous locations. Martin Marietta's own shareholder 1 report states there are issues with their plants being located near neighborhoods and that they frequently attempt to find locations that are a substantial distance from property owners. That obviously is not the case here. I find that to be completely selfish and irresponsible of Martin Marietta Materials because the "convenience" of this location is overpowering everything else, including the health of it's "neighbors" and their quality of life. In Martin Marietta's own site assessment report they indicate that the proposed County Road 13 site is a zero for compatibility with the surrounding neighborhoods and agriculturally zoned properties. For heavens sake, there's an organic farm directly across the street from the proposed location on the Larimer County side, how can this plant be compatible with their farm? Should these people have to lose their livelihood for the sake of Martin Marietta having their most "ideal" location? Secondly, the odor of hot mix asphalt can be extremely strong and overwhelming. It is unbearable to think about sitting on my back porch only to be subjected to these powerful odors and very possibly toxic odors. These odors can certainly be persistent and just simply a nuisance for those living near and around the plant. Thirdly, traffic. This area is already highly congested with traffic and adding another 200 vehicles (trucks) per hour coming in and out of the facility will be detrimental to all of us whom commute to and from work daily on Highway 34. It will certainly effect the school buses whose route is along County Road 13, causing the kids to either be late to school or the need for them to load the buses earlier to allow for time to get through the traffic, making their days extra long. If you do not already travel this highway on a regular basis I would invite you to do so and see for yourself the traffic problem that currently exists. There are times of the day when traffic is literally backed-up on Highway 34 (Westbound) from County Road 17 to Interstate 25 and from County Road 13 (Eastbound) to County Road 17. Having the additional burden of increased traffic at the intersection of Highway 34 and County Road 13 is bound for failure, in addition it is certain that the number of accidents will increase with possible life changing injuries or even death to those involved. Another area of thought is that when the Highway does slow down to stop and go traffic, many of the commuters jump off onto the county roads and use them as an avenue of getting around the traffic problem. I'm certain this will also apply to the large semi trucks that will be hauling the aggregate, asphalt and other products in and out of the plant area. These county roads will become so heavily traveled that the need to maintain these roads will certainly increase tremendously. Now let's throw in the increased train activity that will be crossing Highway 34 at all times of the day and right bringing in the aggregate, just another obviously enormous problem for this Highway and the county roads surrounding it. Another issue to consider is the noise elevation that is certain to come from the Martin Marietta Materials plant. Between the crushing of the aggregate, the increased train traffic, with cars bumping and clanking and whistles blowing, large equipment noises, beeping of trucks and smaller equipment, our peaceful, serene environment will become completely broken. Next are the beautiful views and grand open space that will be taken from all the neighborhoods and surrounding area with this proposed development. Many people have worked incredibly hard, saved diligently and made it their ultimate goal to move to this beautiful area in Weld County. To be unfairly robbed of our views that this massive eyesore of a plant along with their proposed berms will take from us is truly unacceptable. Not to mention the light pollution that will surely change our nightly sky gazing views of the amazing Colorado skies that many of us take great pleasure in. Lastly, is an almost undeniable fact that having this plant developed off of County Road 13 will be so monumentally detrimental to our property values and it certainly will not promote future homeowners to build in this area. 2 Weld County needs to be a good neighbor. Let's keep the 131 acres as they currently are, mixed residential and agricultural use. There is no benefit to the surrounding residents that will come from Martin Marietta Materials building their plant on this proposed site. Martin Marietta Materials does have other options that seem to be more compatible with heavy use industries and these sites also have rail access. It would make more sense to push them from this Weld County location and have them focus more on other locations already zoned for heavy industrial use. I appreciate you hearing my concerns and I pray that you are very thoughtful in your consideration to this matter. Sincerely, Taunya M. Feyen 1233 South County Road 3 Johnstown, CO 80534 and 27113 Coyote Ridge Lane Johnstown, CO 80534 (970) 214-7974 tfeyen@me.com 3 Diana Aungst From: Sue Thomas [skythomas29@yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 12:48 PM To: Diana Aungst Subject: DENY THE USR 15-0027 PERMIT APPLICATION. Weld County Commissioners C/0 Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N 17th Avenue Greeley CO 80631 RE : Planning Application UR 15-0027 : MMM Hwy 34 Development Weld County Commissioners : I am asking that you deny USR15-0027 due to being totally incompatible with the surrounding neighborhood . This area is prime farm land and has been farmed for generations. Allowing a polluting, stinking asphalt plant into this environment is totally incompatible. It will forever ruin the ability to farm these acres. There is a large, long time residential neighborhood that will be hugely impacted by this proposed plant, as well as numerous other homes and farms throughout this stretch between WCR 13 to WCR 15 and Hwy 34 to WCR 54. These homes were here first and people bought or built homes with the understanding that they would be able to live in and enjoy this quiet, rural setting . Our lifestyle will change forever if you approve this noisy, smelly, dangerous plant to be built. Imagine grilling steaks to the lovely aroma of asphalt cement while not being able to hear your guests because of trucks being loaded with tons of rock, as dust settles all over your patio ! Our real estate values would drop significantly. MMM talks about putting in berms to mitigate the unsightliness of the plant. Indian Head Estates sits so much higher than the proposed MMM site that there is no way you could put in a berm high enough to block the view of their plant. The traffic impact would also be huge. The addition of one stop light at WCR 13 and Hwy 34 is in no way going to be enough to allow all the truck traffic to move out of the plant. I am concerned that many trucks will choose to come south to WCR 54 and head for I-25 that way. WCR 54 is a two-lane road wth no shoulders, narrow bridges and steep drop offs. In winter, it becomes extremely icy and often cars slide off over the steep sides and crash below. It would not be safe to load this road up with lots of huge trucks coming and going . The traffic lights close to 1-25 don't manage to handle the truck traffic from Johnson's Corner and the traffic from Thompson Valley subdivision as it is. I can't imagine how snarled this traffic will become with more semi truck traffic. I am extremely sensitive to odors and often have asthmatic reactions to it. Sitting on the highway in stop and go traffic in the summer can make me really nauseated . My bronchial tubes are easily inflamed and I have to use an inhaler and struggle to breathe. I can't imagine having to breathe that odor all the time. MMM has not been able to describe to us how they are going to be able to mitigate those fumes. Having filters over a tank's exhaust is one thing, but how about when all the hot asphalt is being loaded into the trucks and then the trucks sit waiting to leave the plant and driving down the road, truck after truck. I see no way to control the odor during most of the handling of these materials. Noise would be another huge factor. Have you ever heard the sound of tons of rock being loaded into trucks? It is very noisy and extremely dusty. There would also be noise around the clock from the conveyor belts unloading the rail cars. Speaking of rail cars, the rail spur that MMM is proposing will be a curved track - rail car wheels aren't built to steer around curves, the wheels are being dragged off center around the curve and the noise is a terrible high-pitched squeal that is earsplitting . The engines will have to be running for hours, speeding up and down as the cars are unloaded . The plant is expected to run 24/7 - it will be impossible to sleep with the noise of these trains being 'unloaded . AXHIBIT Of all the possible sites that they could build, even Martin Marietta Materials stated that this site was the worst for compatibility. I agree with them . The scale of this operation also makes it truly impossible to mitigate to make it compatible. There are other sites where they would be welcomed, why not build in one of those? Please, deny this USR. Sue Thomas 7182 Lakota Lakes Road Johnstown CO 80534 2 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 2:41 PM To: MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Julie Goettemoeller 1823 Chesapeake Circle Johnstown, CO 80534 July 15, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Julie Goettemoeller EXHIBIT Case #USR 15-0027 For Public Record Date: July 15, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 970-353-6100, ext 3524; Fax: 970-304-6498 daungst@weldgov.com Weld County Commissioners: RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027 : Martin Marietta Highway 34 Development Dear Ms Aungst, I am writing this letter to state my desire that the proposed Martin Marietta Asphalt and Concrete plant is NOT approved at the current proposed location. I oppose this project because it is incompatible with the surrounding area. I have friends who live in the lndianhead Estates subdivision as well as along WCR 13. The word 'Estate' alone implies that the lndianhead subdivision is a really nice, somewhat upscale community filled with residents who value the 'out in the country' feel and take great pride in their homes and surrounding environment. I am certain none of those residents who purchased land and built homes there ever thought that an asphalt and concrete plant was going to be built in their backyard! They never considered it because it's such a ridiculous idea ! In addition to the negative impact it would have on the nearby residents, it will also have a negative impact on the already crowded and dangerous Hwy 34 given the increased truck and train traffic. Please do not approve this project! 42aLL a_ Sin rely, Peggy Pellizzari 1180 Flowering Almond Dr Loveland, CO 80538 970-669-8744 peggy_loveland@comcast.net • EXHIBIT Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 7:03 PM To: MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MM Highway 34 Support Form John Byars 12240 Deerfield Way Broomfield, CO 80020 July 15, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USRI 5-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta' s Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, John Byars EXHIBIT July 15, 2015 RE: Case # USR 15-0027 For Public Record Weld County Board of County Commissioners C/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 North 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Board of County Commissioners, RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027; Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development We are writing in opposition to Martin Marietta's request to rezone an agricultural zoned area to being zoned for industry in order to build a concrete, asphalt and concrete/asphalt recycling plant off of Highway 34. Building this plant close to a subdivision, not to mention only a couple of miles from Centerra Promenade, is irresponsible. Asphalt and concrete plants are dirty and noisy and would greatly decrease home values in the area. Highway 34 is a major thoroughfare from I- 25 to Greeley and is heavily traveled by commuters; compounding it with trucks coming and going from this proposed plant is disastrous! Why would the Board of County Commissioners even consider allowing MMM to build a plant along this stretch of highway! We travel to this area often to visit family. You will be selling out the people who have made their homes in this area if you continue forward with the rezoning from agriculture to industrial. Thank you, Charles & Judy Hemphill 10329 W. Burgundy Ave. Littleton, CO 80127 cowtown5@comcast.net EXHIBIT Diana Aungst From: MM Highway 34 Support [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2015 9:24 AM To: MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Richard Moyer 7955 Dahlia St. Henderson, Co 80640 7-16-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 EXHIBIT rictt Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). As a contractor who has 200 employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! 1 Sincerely, Richard Moyer 2 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2015 1 :26 PM To: MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Amberlynn Moorehouse 7200 E. HWY 14 #3 fort collins co 80524 07- 15-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Amberlynn Moorehouse EXHIBIT 5 i 1ST Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2015 1 :20 PM To: MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Chad Ingalls 22785 County Road 7 Berthoud 07/16/2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Chad Ingalls EXHIBIT 4 I Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2015 12:53 PM To: MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Ashley Selden 1717 8th St. Greeley, CO 80631 07/16/2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Ashley Selden EXHIBIT 3 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2015 12:51 PM To: MMHighway34. info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MM Highway 34 Support Form Wayne Saunders 4102 Hayes Circle Wellington 7/16/2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Wayne Saunders EXHIBIT 1 5 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2015 12:49 PM To: MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Mike MINAGA 118 BEACON WAY WINDSOR 7/16/15 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Mike MINAGA EXHIBIT 2 aZ Diana Aungst From: Bonnie Cooper [boncoop@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2015 12:44 PM To: Diana Aungst Subject: PLEASE DENY USR to MARTIN MARIETTA! Dear City Planners, I am writing this letter to appeal to you to DENY THE USR PERMIT APPLICATION by Martin Marietta for the project off of 34 near County Road 15 (Highway 34 Development). This is my last-minute appeal to ask you to please decide responsibly regarding the MMM proposal , as it will certainly destroy our quality of life as we know it in our neighborhood and the surrounding area . Some of the reasons it is completely incompatible with the area include the ones you've undoubtedly heard from us in the Indianhead Estates neighborhood : noise , odor and pollution , excessive light, air pollution and visual pollution , traffic, etc. Perhaps as important is the precedent it will set. Right now, the 2534 development in Larimer County is booming responsibly: a luxury apartment complex, a 92-bed behavioral health hospital, and a 100,000-square- foot indoor firing range are opening soon. This is commercial development, but NOT HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT, which is the way we hope to have the gateway to Greeley appear. We know that commercial growth in our area is imminent, but let us PLEASE use wisdom in the type of growth proposed . No one, including the local communities in their 2008 intergovernmental agreement, envision the gateway to Greeley, Windsor, and Johnstown as being a heavy industrial site. If Martin Marietta needs to be near a railroad, a highway, and Wyoming , they need to consider a location farther north . Or continue using their existing plant in Greeley on O Street. Or choose another one of their other 12 possibilities. Please don 't let them ruin another spot with noise and dirt! I beg you to please use wisdom as your guide , and not the potential tax dollars . As the area is developed , we will receive tax dollars , but let us develop it responsibly! EXHIBIT 1 3 7c4-4____ _ Thank you for your consideration , Bonne Cooper Indianhead Estates resident 2 To - Weld County Planning Commission and Weld County Commissioners Re - Martin Marietta Materials USR 15-0027 From - S. Collins, Resident of Indianhead Estates subdivision July 16, 2015 This is a follow-up to my previously submitted letter #539, in which I expressed concern about the potential for catastrophic industrial accidents at the proposed Martin Marietta Hwy 34 Project facilities. Upon reviewing the updated USR section on "Secondary emergency access," various referral comments, applicant's responses to them, new facility design plans, and the Planning Staffs report, I perceive even more causes for concern: 1) The entire proposed facility appears to be on an unstable footing. Collapse of any part could initiate a fire or explosion in many ways: a) Front Range Fire Rescue's preferred secondary emergency access road connecting to WCR 56 was called "not feasible" by MM (5/29/15) because "the railroad on the property is constructed on a berm and on the south end it is elevated about 20 feet from existing grade." "The costs of going over or under this railroad make it not feasible." (MM again placing it's expenses over safety). HAVING RAIL SEGMENTS ELEVATED ON A MAN-MADE BERM ADDS INSTABILITY AND INCREASES DERAILMENT RISK. Since the Great Western Railway has not submitted referral comments, would they even agree to this plan, for safety and liability reasons? b) All vehicular traffic is now planned to enter and exit on a bridge over the rail line since "a train will be on the rail loop spur a great deal of the time." But the secondary emergency access will cross the rail spur "when the bridge is not accessible." Why wouldn't the bridge always be accessible? And how could emergencies be serviced if there is simultaneously a train on the rail loop, blocking emergency access? MM has said there will only be 2-3 trains per week bringing aggregate from Wyoming - so why will there be a train on the spur "a great deal of the time?" Perhaps this is another discrepancy between MM's alleged plans and actuality. Can the bridge support the weight of 14-15 ton trucks with loads of 30-43 tons each? Especially since it would apparently need to be 2 lanes wide to accommodate trucks entering and exiting, thereby doubling the weight? As I commented in letter #539, anything on a bridge can fall off of it - adding potential for many types of accident risks at the various plant facilities; especially with thousands of truck trips per day and risk of vehicular traffic - and occupants - falling off the bridge onto a train. Will trucking contractors, owner-operators and the railroad company agree to this, for safety and liability reasons? EXHIBIT c) Reports concerning problematic water and ditch management on site have been submitted by several companies and MM has acknowledged that the water table can extend to within 3-4 feet of the surface, so the entire facility "will be almost entirely built on fill." In combination with relevant factors specific to Weld County cited in the Northeast Colorado Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan (possible land subsidence from fracking under the site, old mines in the "I-25 corridor" 350- 400 feet underground - many of which are unmapped), heavy truck and train vibrations, and the absence of a geological survey or coordinated planning with current land users (oil/gas companies) and civil engineers, one wonders if the proposed MM facility "has a leg to stand on." 2) One point of clarification: in the Planning Staff report one of the comments (apparently referencing my letter #539) mentioned that "homes to the west would be sandblasted by winds." This already occurs in Indianhead Estates (Chinook + Great Plains winds = 70-165 mph potential); an example of a natural hazard almost unique to this specific area, which does not respect codes and regulations. My point was that an MM facility at the proposed site would be subject to the same phenomena. Case #6 in Appendix #2 (letter #539) was an example of an accident which resulted when an asphalt plant was impacted by "only" a 40 mph wind which displaced hot fines, causing a fire and explosion. 3) I noted with interest that a number of the MM form letters in support of the . USR had only a signature - some almost illegible - without an address. Did such signers understand the content of the form letter? How many of them were MM employees fearing job loss? I was very happy to see the recommendation in the Planning Staff report that USR 15-0027 be denied. "The Department of Planning Services believes that the negative impacts are such that there are no conditions that could be placed on this USR that would ensure the compatibility with the surrounding, existing land uses" (page 10 of 18). This conclusion is consistent with the respect for individual liberties that has encouraged migration to this great State throughout its history and with the mission statement of the Planning/Zoning Department, to protect and enhance the quality of life for County residents, businesses and property owners, through response to citizen concerns. I'm proud to be a resident of Weld County. Respectfully submitted, Sharon L. Collins, MD, FACS 27811 Hopi Trl, Johnstown, CO 80534 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2015 1 :44 PM To: MMHighway34.info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MM Highway 34 Support Form Maxine Brungardt PO Box 2465 Loveland 07/16/2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR 15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Maxine Brungardt EXHIBIT 1 I Alb_ John Foster 7301 SW Frontage Rd Ft Collins, CO 80528 July 16, 2015 Weld County Commissioners C/O Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners : I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project ( USR15-0027). As a contractor who has 150 employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, [Your Name] Foster, General Sales Manager, Transpro Inc EXHIBIT s illeal_ Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2015 2:56 PM To: MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Perry Bourgeois 791 Essex Loveland, CO 80538 07/16/2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Perry Bourgeois EXHIBIT 1 9 P C FIVFD JUL 162015 Weld County Planning Department GREELEY OFFICE [Your Name] Poly F se7, <-A [Street Address] 9'C 7z w zeir M 5T 2ct et/int / yZ [City, ST ZIP Code] 6-r- ✓ [Date] 7j 7/ (3-- Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N . 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027) . I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I , however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. l urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, [Your Name] 47 EXHIBIT Vi P t ;e rP F: :r JUL 16 2015 Weld County Planning Department GREELEY OFFICE [Your Name] ke_ I '\c t_ r � k [Street Address] 4 �--j,C j, f t 11 [City, ST ZIP Code] �T + LAAr l+ l tc-111 [Date] -- e e k xj :"-c , GCS BSc u Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N . 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners : As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027) . I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, Afeel-ILY--H) [Your Name] Death\ ie Pcoola EXHIBIT D 3 prr vre JUL 16 2015 Weld County Planning Department GREELEY OFFICE [Your Name] (2 Q K Re lit d-f [Street Address] 44'4 72 07oi. rl' 1 C,� '"'-� � /t-ki e i [City, ST ZIP Code] --06 / ay- [Date] �� Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N . 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners : As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027) . I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials . Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, - = [Your Name] EXHIBIT pr ri D L '•4. ::-r; ..;,a ,&w ki vier P.-si JUL 16 2015 Weld County Planning Department GREELEY OFFICE [Your Name] G. ` " / a, GtS6r) [Street Address] 2 29 Tv 5 nd ,qVe„ [City, ST ZIP Code] Cr eciCy (o g bay [Date] Wail ) 5 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-O027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners : As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project ( USR15-O027) . I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, 09 Pan Di (.4 a) [Your Name] EXHIBIT 531 a JUL 16 2015 wtiu county Planning VcIJj ufwn ( � GREELEY OFFICE [Your Name] �- '� G Ai46A/afrhl/ Street Address] 22 5-2,11 e [City, ST ZIP Code] On.cs_Q.t, , CO i?‘3Y [ Date] 6 - (91- t f Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N . 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners : As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027) . I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, CzA Art, [Your Name] • EXHIBIT p pr. r ri Inky: r) JUL 16 2015 Weld County Planning Department h � GREELEY OFFICE [Your Name] j/�ef / 4' [Street Address] 7,21 Lam, orofic S L/ [City, ST ZIP Code] /� > 7f�c/r (�D . cf64357 [Date] 22// S/ol 6 iS Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N . 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027) . I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very dose to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, //a_ irCel"- [Your Name] %in__ EXHI IT 9ti rtl F 1yp } f S,. '4" JUL 162015 [Your Name] weld County Planning Department [Street Address] GREELEY OFFICE [City, ST ZIP Code] [Date] r /2-so is) Weld County Commissioners �i U 1 � 00 0 c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027) I Weld County Planning 1555 N . 17th Avenue Fr cdLy Li w Greeley, CO 80631 eV 6016 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). As a contractor who has number of employees employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower- If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, f/eAllb‘ [Your Name] EXHIBIT 0 1%it A n rrr ' \ r" JUL 162015 Maki co,:nnty Flan►►►;id .,.,,..+, �u�du� GREELEY OFFICE [Your Name] t-�� gyn./get/4d° [Street Address] T3eo ( I sLVC.L,T Av - [City, ST ZIP Code] ILrjc (A. te4 GO) 4 Ca g0sgg [Date) 4 -- 3O. ( 5.- Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-OO27) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, [Your Name] EXHIBIT JUL 16 2015 rdelO County nGREELEY��ing OFF�ICE uncut [Your Name] J 5hecrtifeub [Street Address] 3t �.• � boss_ ,T,_�a�� ' [City, ST ZIP Code] pr. Caw s Co? fdSO��[Date] VeN • , S� I C Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, [Your rye] EXHIBIT RECEiVED JUL 162015 Weld County Planning Department [Your Name] cleats" 4jft k(A'i 1 GREELEY OFFICE [Street Address] A-72.. � by Or, [City, ST ZIP Code] Ir-÷i egIva S vi 4-4�1�� e1 [Date] 5130// 4"-- Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N . 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, [Your Name] �'� EXHIBIT JUL-9-2015 12 : 21 FROM : MARTIN a SONS EXCAYR 9706350413 TO : 4073902 P . 1 07/ 09/ 2015 10 : 52 9704073902 MARTINI MARIETTA PAGE 01 /01 rrr, � . JUL 16 2015 - Weld County 1-'fanning voi:tYr�nt [Your Name] . mrn GREELEY OFFICE par (Street Adds€ssl ao f*a C-�.c..� d (City, T ZIP Cadet Lime' sC a...„ P Ce os 3-7 [DMtej 1 /9 /620 ( Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (U5R15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N, 17th Avenue Greeley, CO S0SA1 Dear Weld County Commissioners, 1 am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027)- t understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project throur our resloPS's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development- The project site IS located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project, Our region will benofit from the project as the cost to construct V;t 1 infraftructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever Increasing distances. I urge you to approve darter+ Marietta's Highway 34 Protect end look forward to your responseI Sinccrdv • AL-444-AL, [Your Name] EXHIBIT p- ivr: JUL 16 2015 Weld County Planning Department GREELEY OFFICE Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project- I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, Pint told �► .� EXHIBIT RECEIVED JUL 162015 Weld County Planning Department GREELEY OFFICE Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N . 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project ( USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, G- Ley L,thJS CNC ket EXHIBIT Stra% I F\\ FCnVED JUL 16 [Your Name] �� r �?�f� G�. 2015 [Street Address] dZ © arA � � � co c$,�b f D Weld County GREELEY OFFIC Planning Department [City, ST ZIP Code] [Date] 7 _ 9 - Z ©i.5 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project ( USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, [Your Name] i 4egoi- e after akid CGS EXHIBIT RECE ! VFD [Your Name] � , J44C. BeCh 12 — JUL 6 2015 [Street Address] 0) ? , BEA A P Weld County Planning Department [City, ST ZIP Code] rc9innOSok, _o D5-3 GREELEY OFFICE [Date] 7_ 1_/ 7' Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17`x' Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- OO27). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, Fi4y ,� 0512 cli...2a0d-4eACe- C-Aer [Your Name] EXHIBIT 133 RCE ! VW JUL 16 2015 [Your Name] 6 cry /Jaz, ke s -- Weld County Planning Depaiiment GREELEY OFFICE [Street Address] ls Y[Cit , ST ZIP Code] 2,0 : �� j lent C [Date] /-A. 6/tin b0 Co Cf o J Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, y !Ito keAr [Your Name] EXHIBIT n r r � it 7 nid JUL 162015 Weld County Planning Department GREELEY OFFICE Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners : I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project ( USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, 51- -' Y ` ,-/ea, 4 / , /u'n/I l y' wad 6a tit EXHIBIT PLM Asphalt & Concrete Nathan Amsinger PLM Asphalt & Concrete Inc. RECERIFD 3313 Moline St. Aurora Co. 80010 JUL 16 2015 July 10,2015 Weld County Planning Department GREELEY OFFICE Weld County Commissioners C/O Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Ave. Greeley Co. 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR 15-0027) As a contractor who has 125 employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building material. The location of the asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier fo my business to obtain the material and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my cost lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees, and the end product user. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building material, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks brining this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response. Sincerely Nay A tie. Nathan Amsinger General Manager EXHIBIT i Moline St * Aurora Co. 800io303.287.0777 33 3 RFCFNED JUL 1 6 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CGM Planner II Weld County Planning Department GREELEY OFFICE Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 EXHIBIT RE: Case # USR 15-0027 June 20, 2015 I Bari Dear Weld County Commissioners I live in Indianhead Estates on Hopi Trail. Please add my name to your growing list of people whose lifestyle would be extremely negatively affected if Martin Marietta is permitted to build their proposed monstrosity in my back yard. I am lending my strong support to the decision made by the Town Council of the Town of Johnstown "PASSED, SIGNED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED on June 15, 2015" as copied below: WHEREAS, construction of the proposed facility is not in the best interests of the Town or the citizens of the Town and surrounding areas. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF JOHNSTOWN, COLORADO, THAT: 1 . The Town Council strongly opposes Martin Marietta's use by special review application for construction of the Martin Marietta Project. 2. The Town Council respectfully requests that Weld County deny Martin Marietta's use by special review application. PASSED, SIGNED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 15th day of June, 2015. Thank you for your support of the decision of the Town of Johnstown Town Council that you deny Martin Marietta's use by special review application. O6 -79? ulhitaii „),e cLtiatAt_Lefel,, Sincerely, Al _to VPLezic.t&;c Lgalaz u-P1,114-eti e -- C��, d-e , „ A--OZ UWC-a-c9 61/24 . cPA ao iv a-kJ_ W r i Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2015 3:49 PM To: MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MM Highway 34 Support Form Gwen Cook 7301 SW Frontage Rd. #3 Fort Collins CO 80528 July 162015 Weld County Commissioners do Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta' s Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Gwen Cook EXHIBIT 1 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 12:53 PM To: michael.long2008@gmail.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Michael Long 7301 SW Frontage RD Fort Collins CO 80528 07. 17.2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Michael Long EXHIBIT 1I a Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2015 9:22 PM To: MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MM Highway 34 Support Form Travis Miller 4539 Tarragon Dr Johnstown July 16, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Travis Miller EXHIBIT 2 1430_ Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2015 9:34 PM To: travis@hmktrucking.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Tiffany Miller 4539 Tarragon Dr Johnstown, CO 80534 July 16, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Tiffany Miller EXHIBIT Hilary Anderson Schafer Attorney at Law 1824 Little RAWcn Stint • Derives, I X) 80202 9111.;396.9) 12 • hander cnn52 014gmail.cum July 16, 2015 SEE l VIA I ti1AIl . AND EMAIL TO: aA1u;r.r. I. !tt, : ,lv,c: 'ru Weld County Commissinncn c/n ftana .ltingst, AICP, CFli Planner I Weld Counts, 1)epartxnsrnt of Planning Services 1333 North 1''" Avenue ( :reeky, CC ) 80631 RE: P ni A plic a 'on L1S 15-0027: Mu¢i Marietta M�tctri, H��har.- ay 34 1)_c n c 12 uiiin r a t IDe2x Ms. Aungstw This letter is my formal objection to the proposed Martin Marietta Material% (IN#1IINt) development 4011th of Highway 34 and cast of WCR 13 in Weld County (the "Proposed teevdopment"). I strongly oppose the Proposed Development due to the negative impacts it will have on the individuals who live, work, and mrvcl through this an Mv parents live in the lndisn Flcxd It tnwrx subdivisuin adjacent to the Proposed Development and settled in this area for the cluahty of life — a peaceful, close-knit community, where traffic don not ins] dnwntnw-n Denver, the air i5 cleaner, kids plat outside, and families and friends can enjoy simpler things in her. I visit this area several units a month with my husband and four- month old son. 'The manufacturing and reccding•procc s: of aggregates Ind asphalt, industrial air emissions, odor, and fugitive dust emissions that will result from the Proposed Development poise a threat to my family and me and all those who live and work in this area. Should the Proposed Ikvctopmcnt he approved, I fear for my parents', my ranee n's. and my health Martin Marietta has yet to prove that its processes and maanutacturnsg arc sate, and for this very reason, 1 and many °then will apt to live and visit other arras of Colorado. the Proposed Development is *Ian inconsistent with the surrounding area and would be better suited in an are already zoned for industrial use, such as those 12 zones near Milliken and Windsor. I have seen the impscrs of industrial businesses in residential areas — the residents leave, focal :tnd reign finesses relocate, and the arty slowly become-5 that of a highway for those passim; by. No <snc stun. tic Proposed Development will impair property values and thwart further residential and retail development_ Finally. the Proposed Development will severely comprotruse public safety due to mcrrascd traffic ( 1129 vehicle trips to ?264i vvhirle trips daily). Ilighway 34 alrradv experiences heavy traffic and congestion, Numerous times I have chosen to take side roads to navigate the arts to avoid the congestion and dang_e ous uiterrcctions_ The Proposed Development will make traffic exponentially worse. I encourage the members of the Commission to put themselves in the shoes of those individuals and families who live and work in the an of the Proposed Development and ask themselves whether thcv EXHIBIT 9 wed want the Proposed Development imparting their family, friends, and neighbors. Pia retect the Proposed Development. I would sincerely apprecies Wyatt chi please aciusaiviette, by rnaux OS% that rim haye received this krter said Sit has been incorporated into the Public- ae+d and the toepeethc packets tor the Board ofCo -Thankyou i* yotsnotatiti aat yAS et, Case #USR 15-0027 For Public Record July 16, 2015 Weld County Commissioners do Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner It Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N . 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 970-353-6100, ext. 3524; Fax: 970-304-6498 daungst@weldgov. com Weld County Commissioners: RE : Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Highway 34 Development It has recently been brought to my attention that Martin Marietta Materials is trying to build an Asphalt and Concrete processing plant at Weld County Road 13 and Highway 34 . I do not live in the direct area but I do commute on Highway 34 to Greeley from Loveland and have been for the last 22 years. I have experienced the the increase of traffic over the years and the numerous windshields I have had to replace because of it. I cannot believe the addition of countless trucks per day traveling Highway 34 would be beneficial to this area in Weld county. The winter time travel is already a nightmare with more and more accidents each winter. It would be nice to have the gateway to Greeley preserved as pleasant. Greeley has strived so hard in the past few years in outdoor improvements and how wonderful it would be for it to be known for it's beauty rather than its smells. The funding behind Martin Marietta Materials will be substantial and therefore it is important that the voice of ordinary citizens speak their concerns. I would like to be added to those that are opposed to the development of the Asphalt and Concrete processing plant along Highway 34. Thanks you for your time and consideration . Sincerely, Mary Herrera EXHIBIT Diana Aungst From: Larry Buckendorf [Larry@journeyhomes.com] Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 12:56 PM To: Diana Aungst Subject: Martin Marietts Project Ms. August: We are the largest homebuilding and development firm in Northern Colorado. We are local and based in Greeley. Our organizations fully support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027) . As a contractor who has 103 employees and employs hundreds of subcontractors, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. My employees live in Northern Colorado. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, Larry S. Buckendorf, J.D. Journey Homes, LLC 7251 W. 20th Street, L-200 Greeley, CO 80634 (970) 352-7072 (o) (970) 330-5357 (f) EXHIBIT Un Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 12:50 PM To: Tarry@journeyhomes.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Larry S Buckendorf 7251 W. 20th Street, L-200 Greeley, CO 80634 7/17/15 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). As a contractor who has 64 employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! EXHIBIT 1 I lici. R. R7FIVED Personal Statement JUL. 17 2625 To : Weld County Planning Commissioners Weld County Planning Department GREELEY OFFICE cjo Diana Aungst I , (1)71 ei6t r Priv)) A Y1AA \ wish to go on the record to express my strong opposition to the Martin Marietta Materials " Highway 34 Project" which will be considered at the Planning Commission hearing on July 21, 2015 . While I wish to attend the hearing and express my concerns in person , I will not be able to do so because: ca a,YUL y \ _p , M-ekikak COAL --Fb j-KiL +01,0eS64.4,, & I, . yulditi,",) , 1 li, 1 , A rl A/CIC It 1")k)e-/ .� Please accept my apology for my absence and recommend DENIAL of the project application on my behalf. ---2 Signature : _7;-- 1 a's --- Date: 7//(0-5-- Address: ,Qi ; �S 7 Sbhvs1a' Ca ,4 & l - . 4 ) 1O r SoilkEhTlAite - 1 0 6 gOl S 3 y koyii,Q, : a-7 fat (', 01A0.-4-e__ kibtr LIA (rreut rkaxci- +t) A 514rA` (4j �O seoS3q ropossed Nt tit pf + EXHIBIT 8 5 4 1 MEC MT) Personal Statement JUL 17 2015 To : Weld County Planning Commissioners YVula County Planning Geput;,ient GREELEY OFFICE c/o Diana Aungst Y. A. n 3/47\- ail) wish to go on the r record to express my strong opposition to the Martin Marietta Materials "Highway 34 Project" which will be considered at the Planning Commission hearing on July 21, 2015 . While I wish to attend the hearing and express my concerns in person, I will not be able to do so because : Sky.z 4tirUAk Ir- 1\kAt eVecAl--.5 ( v\- Please accept my apology for my absence and recommend DENIAL of the project application on my behalf. Signatur Date: Address: c9- 7 / O / o - 1�.i e (vt� I rin kv\,c+c . Co go s 3 EXHIBIT Case # USR 15-0027 For Public Record July 16, 2015 To: Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II 9 rev'\ •. : _, F :: ) Weld Couty Department of Planning Services 1 r 1555 N. 17th Avenue, Greeley, CO 80631 JUL203 Weld County Hunni ; : t;;r;;, ��},�„ RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marrietta Materials GREELEY OFHCE Highway 34 Development Weld County Commissioners: Please DENY the application for special use. As I move into my new dream home in Coyote Ridge Lane this week, I am very saddened that my investment is now at risk of being significantly diminished by a big corporation bringing in a massive asphalt plant. I bought the property 4 years ago because I loved the pastoral views with close proximity to everything. We just put tremendous time, energy and most of our life earnings into building this amazing home only to have it compromised by the county changing agricultural use land into heavy industrial. The Highway 34 corridor has become a beautiful residential and light commercial area for our county. 1 expected that over time the area would grow up with more homes and businesses like were coming in but I never expected an asphalt plant would ever be considered. My greatest fear when I bought the property was that as my kids start driving (and my daughter is taking drivers education this summer) that they would get hurt pulling out onto Hwy 34 from CR 15. We had told her that while in high school, for her safety, she would need to drive around to the light at CR 17 on her way to Resurrection Christian. Now my fear for her is even greater with all the MM trucks. I thought I was moving my kids to the country to enjoy the land, play in the dirt and get some chickens, not live close to a health hazard. My husband and I are small town family physicians who love working and serving the town of Johnstown. We fear for the health of our community with this plant so close to so many neighborhoods such as Thompson River Ranch, Thompson Crossing and especially Indian Head Estates. We care for patients in all these communities and wilt be watching for signs and symptoms of the toxins an asphalt plant is know to produce. Some of our patients are even MM employees. I know you have received letters of support but have you investigated how many of them are MM employees or relatives of employees? How many are true independent citizens? As our entrusted government officials, please, please, please protect us by denying this application. Ke.,,,With treme sincerity, 4 .Brown �— Mother ai d new omeowner 27121 Coyote Ridge Lane Johnstown, CO 80534 Dr. Cara Brown, MD Family Physicians of Johnstown 257 Johnstown Center Dr. #110 Johnstown, CO 80534 EXHIBIT p n Herman Naranjo C P `' \ ' r ' 16474 Longs Peak Rd . JUL 1- 7 2015 Greeley, CO 80631 u July 15, 2015 Weld County Planning +uci,u1tnid,lt GREELEY OFFICE Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, man Naranjo HIBIT r, r rksrP4 e .� � ... GLH Construction INC JUL 17 2015 780 East Garden Dr County 1 Weld Cour:ty r li:n 11; !g L/�.�lu"{ l{IlZilll Windsor Co 80550 GREELEY OFFICE July 15, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N . 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners : As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project ( USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, 671 /1-3 /Les idK GLH Construction INC EXHIBIT Frrnmg \try rt [Your Name] JULtattAn_ 17 2015 [Street Address] cf 53 e-a P .✓{ Weld County Planning 1ic.p:;iitnt:ot [City, ST ZIP Code] C ,,., Llat, co 8-6(., 3 L GREELEY OFFICE [Date] 7frit Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, .� [Your Name] (�vtkt'Z cotAbutt EXHIBIT g I JUL 17 2015 [Your Name] GI.; c Lc "04-o f,nc.n.a Vvtlu Cool y [Street Address] 71v, c Z 61-a tic,* GREELEY OFFICE jt [City, ST ZIP Code] Clre-CA y CO gob) H [Date] 77(5/ (5 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027) . I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, [Your Name] Ci I ti C sir‘ .o c,e L,r_ EXHIBIT kPip" ' [Your Name] Sere/N. 1 L14.-re1/4--41-e.- '�[Street Address] (:l 5 hai� ` . kJUL 1 20 �S [City, ST ZIP Code] S� Weld tJtYPIUnL. 7LCPJ, L,• (221 r-CC f-e ( e (' O 0063t- ndlit [Date] "'SAS / 6 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, fdlicdrV [Your Name] gen, e EXHIBIT [Your Name] Gtrcrck tier A rn cc Zs, JUL 17 201r [Street Address] (a % 3L g-` S - Weld County FI: nning ; [City, ST ZIP Code] G „et c 5O4O•3c_,,� GLEELEY OFFICE [Date] 7/i5 J i 5 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, [Your Name] Civrotr ki—NcyNat,t. EXHIBIT t prerr.: nkr_mrin [Your Name] /2'4J2 .,toic JUL 17 2l.a [Street Address] "M /n) n . f J Weld County Planning CVepari mw,;; [City, ST ZIP Code] rGREELEY O!- rICE [Date] Gfit-/7 ) ciiti Co. 10 .34/ Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027) . I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, [Your Name] a "di EXHIBIT ??115 [Your Name] 9,(e �� i l"L ibeivirktprf .' � f ( , " trn wvc� ic&R0C 4 3 7 [Street AddresS, a V MJ V�l� I [City, ST ZIP Code] [Date] 07161 ( c 1 ( _ r `. J :;r S A Weld County Commissioners � , c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) JUL 17 Weld County Planning weld County Mining Dc ai tnic it 1555 N. 17th Avenue GREELEY OFFICE Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, [Your Name] iir1/211,(11-tWA 6YOCACe EXHIBIT rtr: crcFVFD [Your Name] /11‘eri I ik,...tvec3 JUL 17 Z015 [Street Address] O7 8 isS re, L_ v 'c- [ , ST ZIP Code] ` CO g0L 2 G V1eid County Punning DepartmentCit Y pat C. Ilhs 1 l GREELEY OFFICE [Date] 7/K/i s Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners : I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very dose to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, [Your Name] Twe egb EXHIBIT g j p„ 1e� •.� C W Y [Your Name] 4 Ili ,�� JUL 17 2015 Street Address (� 1 1 Rc&zo� ( J 1 �CL4 h Weld County Pia nn.nE (City, ST ZIP Code] larlakteR CC) 3 GREELEY OFFICE [Date] -g - aO(S Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, [Yo p 34/.1 g EXHIBIT I F1/ 8 • [Your Name] IKeititA Li JUL 17 2015 [Street Address] ' (,�,uf L 81- eeetd CJ "�' � fat " Weld County f'l r�r�inL Licn3ri��oi,i � _ [City, ST ZIP Code] .�.� 'C� 3al— G % Lt.LEY OFFICE [Date] c/ pots' Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, IrSy [Your Name] EXHIBIT . q g P n n Your Name] o� c2oaGj € e L L'_- JUL 17 2015 [Street Address] 37 (a O 4E _ /5 1 `` 54-, Weld County Pl.,mning UL irne� i GREELEY OFFICE [City, ST ZIP Code] L.° i.c� taale .J 9u5�5 7 [Date] 7 //451 15 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027) . I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 3 roject and look forward to your response! Sincerely, [Your Name] C letro-rde (.1,Cy‘creeN.epee frLo r c ye7 EXHIBIT fit NflRflND t . : \N", - ___, - 1, 1 ir c o ri s -r Fa u C -r o IRS Fr: n. , 7 i ) Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027)Weld County Planning JUL 17 2015 1555 N. 17th Avenue Weld County f I nnin, Depa:tment Greeley, CO 8O631 GREELEY OFFICE Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR1S-OO27). As a contractor who has 55 employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, i would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, 9 141/1 EXHIBIT Jerry Naranjo g- 5 ' General Manager 1863 Second Avenue Greeley, CO 8O631 I www. naranjocivil. com I Phone: 970. 356. 79O9 I Fax: 970. 356 . 0887 GLH Construction INC 780 East Garden Dr rr 71, . m Windsor Co 80550 " , r . July 15, 2015 JUL 17205 Weld County Commissioners �dLiu Coi.lrity GREELEY Of- rICL c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). As a contractor who has 55 employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, j) a 7 4' . Eta de tne-r GLH Construction INC EXHIBIT g6(9. 1-2 Contracting Company r n err rn t.450 E. 16th St. s Greeley, CO 80631 July 16, 2015 JUL 17 2015 Weld County Planning GREELEY OFFICE Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners. I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project ( USR15-0027). As a contractor who has 25 employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, _7 74 J-2 Contracting Company EXHIBIT Diana Aungst k [ CEVFI) From: Cleo Beauprez [cgbeau12@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 11 :05 AM JUL 17 2015 To: Diana Aungst Subject: Denial of USR 15-0027 weld County ELEY OFFICE We are writing this letter to ask you to please deny USR-15-0027. While we don't live in the area, our daughter and friends do and they are very concerned about how this will affect their quality of life. It is an agricultural area and should be left that way. It is my understanding that Martin-Marietta already has a plant near Windsor in an industrial area and this asphalt plant could be situated there and should be. We also come to the Loveland and Greeley areas to go to doctors and hospitals and find Hwy 34 to already to very congested and hard to drive through. We can't imagine how much more traffic this plant would create on Hwy 34 and I 25. Please deny USR 15-0027 Thank you. Gene & Cleo Beauprez Ft Morgan, CO EXHIBIT Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com) Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 11 :55 AM To: cmlniesent@msn.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Sandi ZettlerRECEIVE "' PO box 7469 Arvada Co 80006 JUL 112015 7-17-2015 v4e1d County NanningCE Fie' Weld County Commissioners GREELEY c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning OF 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Sandi Zettler EXHIBIT g95 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.comj Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 4:26 PM To: MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Kelly Harris 309 central Ave Severance, co 80546 7- 17- 15 E. c„, sk ; Weld County Commissioners 11 2015 c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) JUL Weld County Planning �,l�nr� :U 1555 N. 17th Avenue v�cld `GTE ELEY OFFICE Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Kelly Harris EXHIBIT 1 geic, Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 4:23 PM To: MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Tim Harris 309 central ave Severance, co 80546 7- 17- 15 FCEq '\I ° Weld County Commissioners JUL 11 2015 c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning veld County Planning Lupaa u W it 1555 N. 17th Avenue GREELEY OFFICE Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Tim Harris EXHIBIT 1 8S '7 Diana Aungst From: Andy Pett [andypett@outlook.com] Sent: Sunday, July 19, 2015 10:39 AM To: Diana Aungst Subject: Opposition to Case # USR 15-0027 July 19, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 RE: Case # USR 15-0027 For Public Record Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development Weld County Commissioners: As a long-time resident and employee of Northern Colorado, I oppose the proposed asphalt plant near the intersection of I-25 and Hwy 34. As a resident, the traffic at this intersection is dangerous enough. As an employee of a small company that struggles daily with transportation, the increased traffic will undoubtedly have an adverse impact on my employer, coworkers and our ability to service our customers. It's worth noting that I'm a veteran of the heavy highway industry and understand that roads must be built and maintained. My primary concern is the proposed location and it's impact on the congestion around 1-25/Hwy 34. There are other locations that would be just as beneficial to MMM, but would minimize the mass disruption to our already overcrowded corner of Northern Colorado. Andy Pea 5220 Boardwalk Dr., H-34 Fort Collins, CO 80525 andypett@outlook.com wish to fax or email your letter, you may do so. • EXHIBIT 1 I $5g EXHIBIT To: Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II — g 8� q Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N . 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 970-353-6100 ext 3524; Fax: 970-304-6498 daungst@weldqov. com R EC E V From : D. Kay Brunmeier JUL 20 2015 Resident 1074 Poplar, Weld County Planning Department GREELEY OFFICE Johnstown (Kelim) 80534 To: Case # USR 15-0027 I am strongly opposed to the Martin Marietta Materials (MMM) Highway 34 Development. A heavy industry plant of this nature is totally incompatible with the surrounding area zoned for residential, agricultural and light industry businesses. I moved into this residence three years ago for the fresh air, serenity, and the beauty this area brings. I enjoy living in this historical agricultural area with farms dating back to the 1850's. I am comfortable with the light industrial businesses that have filled in some of the surrounding area but the MMM project will not be like the light industrial business are accustomed to but an entirely unacceptable land use change. The proposed MMM plant will in fact introduce into this very safe community hazards that can result in the destruction of my current way of life with noise, hazardous dust particles, and toxic odors. The plant will disrupt the serenity of my sleep; deteriorate the quality of the air breathe. I enjoy the quiet morning sunrises, the bird's singing in the early morning and the bray of our donkey. All that will be gone with a 24/7 heavy industrial plant nearby. Of particular concern is the impact this will have on the livestock and their environment, some of which is raised on this property and used for subsistence, and on the ground water the livestock drink. Even if that doesn't happen overnight, the water could ultimately be affected . I am also concerned about hazardous emissions and toxic fumes/odors associated with an asphalt plant. My companion is 87 years old and we have small great-grand children that are accustomed to feeding the livestock and riding the ponies. We will all be negatively affected by the daily, ongoing pollution of over 100 , 000 lbs/annually of associated asphalt dust particles, unpleasant/toxic odors and noise. Of paramount concern is access to/from our home. I can't imagine what it will be like to have an increase of more than 800 trucks daily on WCR 13. We already have a hard time accessing Highway 34. This increase also brings additional safety risks to me and all the farmers , bikers, equestrians and pedestrians that use WCR 13. I also feel it could impede the arrival of emergency vehicles when needed . The increased noise level is also an issue. The hours of proposed operation , 24 hours/ 7 days a week and 365 days a year are unacceptable and intolerable. There will be an increase of noise from all aspects of the facility operations: backup alarms, heavy conveyor belt operations, idling trucks, heavy equipment operations, train operations, unloading and loading operations, etc. Add to that the increased noise of train traffic by Great Western and Union Pacific. There are other locations within Weld County (the Great Western Industrial Park in Windsor for example) which have all of the infrastructure needed - including all railroads-GW, UP and BNSF. As a resident, I implore you , please vote no on this proposal, and encourage Martin Marietta to seek one of the other more compatible Weld County sites for their facility. Respectfully submitted, D . Kay Brunmeier To: Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 970-353-6100 ext 3524; Fax: 970-304-6498 daungst@weldgov.com RECEIVED From: Danny Horn JUL 20 2015 Beneficiary in Dale Horn Family Trust Weld County Planning Department 1074 Poplar, GREELEY OFFICE Johnstown (Kelim) 80534 To: Case # USR 15-0027 I am strongly opposed to the prospect of having a h industry plant operating 24/7 in my aging father's back yard. My parents have always preferred quiet country living and have made their place in Kelim a sanctuary for just that purpose. For as long as I can remember Dad has loved tending to his critters on his small acreage. Indeed there is magic in the air when that Colorado sun peeks up over livestock eagerly rustling their sweet smelling hay. How he enjoys the serene chirp of a distant meadow lark as the day begins! Will he hear a distant bird chip over the continual roar of a materials processing plant? Will he smell the gentle sweetness of alfalfa thru the acrid burning of asphalt vapor? However benign the proposal may sound, I think the honest answers will be NO and NO. My primary interest is in my Dad's health and happiness. At 87 he is too old to pick up, move and start over. As a listed beneficiary in the family trust I am concerned that property values will plummet as history has shown again and again in these scenarios. Please, please don't approve this proposed monstrosity. It will benefit a few but at such great expense to so many. It will most assuredly crush the serenity of this quiet residential/agricultural area. Sincerely, Danny Horn Son of Dale Horn, 1074 Poplar, Johnstown (Kelim) 80534 EXHIBIT SCa Diana Aunq j Subject: FW: Case # USR 15-0027 Importance: High To: Weld County Commissioners Fp ' V do Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services JUL 20 2015 1555 N. 17th Avenue, Greeley, Colorado 80631 weld County Planning Department From: Vicki Betton GREELEY OFFICE Executor, Dale Horn Family Trust 1074 Poplar, Johnstown (Kelim) 80534 RE: Case # USR 15-0027 I write this to voice strong opposition to the Martin Marietta Materials (MMM) proposed Highway 34 Development. A heavy industry plant of this nature is totally incompatible with the surrounding area of zoned residential, agricultural and light industry businesses. This plant would essentially be in our family property "back-yard". It will in fact destroy my family's current way of life with noise, hazardous dust particles, and toxic odors. It will pollute the water we drink, the air we breathe, and disrupt the serenity of our sleep. Over the past 25 years that my parent's have lived there, we have all come to consider this "home". I visit often and for extended periods of time. My children and their children rely on this small acreage to provide us serenity; the joyous smell of fresh air, early sounds of morning and quiet of evening sunsets. This proposal also brings serious health and safety concerns for all. Water, air and noise pollution will have a major impact. Issues include: • The impact of hazardous emissions and toxic fumes/odors associated with an asphalt plant. We will all be negatively affected by the daily, ongoing pollution of over 100,000 lbs/annually of associated asphalt dust particles and unpleasant/toxic odors. In particular though, is the health issue asphalt pollution will have on the very old and young who call our property home. My Dad and primary resident of the home is 87 years old. He has small great-grand children that are accustomed to feeding the livestock and riding the ponies. • The environmental impact this has on family livestock, some of which are used for subsistence. • The impact of an increased 800 plus trucks daily on WCR 13 and Highway 34. Access to Highway 34 is already difficult. Not to mention the increased safety hazard to and our family and all the farmers, bikers, equestrians and those who walk along WCR 23. • The impact of noise on the quality of life for residents and livestock. The hours of proposed operation, 24 hours/ 7 days a week and 365 days a year are unacceptable and intolerable. There will be an increase of noise from all aspects of the facility operations: backup alarms, heavy conveyor belt operations, idling trucks, heavy equipment operations, train operations, unloading and loading operations, etc. Add to that the increased noise of train traffic by Great Western and Union Pacific. Last but not least — is the very real negative impact this will have to existing the property values. It is estimated that the negative impact of this plant will likely decrease neighboring properties by 30-50%. Our family is relying on the value of the property to provide support should Dad need assisted living — a very real concern at his 87 years of age. There are other locations within Weld County (the Great Western Industrial Park in Windsor for example) which have all of the infrastructure needed - including all railroads-GW, UP and BNSF. As family residents and taxpayers in Weld County for the past 25 years, I urge you to vote no on this proposal, and encourage Martin Marietta to seek one of the other more compatible Weld County sites for their facility. Respectfully, Vicki Betton Vicki Betton, Executor, Dale Horn Family Trust 1074 Poplar, Johnstown (Kelim) 80534 EXHIBIT 1 ) Case # USR 15-0027 For Public Record July 15 , 2015RECEIVED Weld County Commissioners JUL 20 2015 CIO Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Planning Department Weld County Department of Planning Services GREELEY OFFICE 1555 N . 17t1 Avenue Greeley CO 80631 Dear Ms . Aungst and Weld County Commissioners' Please do not approve the USR 15-0027. The industrial use proposed by Martin Marietta Materials is not compatible with the surrounding farms and homes . The roads and highways in this area are inadequate for the current volume of traffic. Describing their traffic volume as "trips" disguises the impact that Martin Marietta's industrial activity will have on this area. These "trips" are made by large trucks and each will have several times the impact on traffic congestion than the commuters and shoppers currently traveling in the area . These heavy trucks will also do more damage to the roads and highways than those commuters and shoppers . The additional trains crossing Highway 34 will add to the traffic congestion and cause significant delays. The noise from the operation of this industrial facility, the added truck traffic, and the added trains to service this facility will destroy the quiet that we currently enjoy. We can hear crickets and coyotes now. The night is not polluted with light as it will be with an industrial facility in our midst. My husband has been diagnosed with a chronic lung ailment. Any degradation in our air quality, such as an increase in dust that will be generated by this industrial facility, is a serious health concern for us . This is not a case of moving next to the airport and complaining about the noise. We specifically chose to live in a quiet agriculture zoned area. Approving this incompatible use will ruin the character of our community. Regards, --\)0 Den-4 Patricia Worrell Homeowner lndianhead Subdivision EXHIBIT Diana Aungst From: Gary Cooper [coopsrebel@gmail.comj Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2015 9: 13 PM To: Diana Aungst Subject: Please deny USR PERMIT APPLICATION by Martin Marietta Dear City Planners, I am writing this letter to appeal to you to DENY THE USR PERMIT APPLICATION by Martin Marietta for the project off of 34 near County Road 15 (Highway 34 Development). This is my last-minute appeal to ask you to please decide responsibly regarding the MMM proposal , as it will certainly destroy our quality of life as we know it in our neighborhood and the surrounding area . Below are only some of the reasons it is completely incompatible with the area : Noise — construction , trains traveling and coupling and un-coupling , train horns , which are already quite noticeable without this project, trucks , back-up beeping signals, asphalt processing , and various other industrial noises are sure to destroy our peaceful setting in this area. Odor and pollution — as we know, it is quite windy in northern Colorado , and even with new filters and industrial processing systems , no once can control the natural elements . Excessive light, air pollution , ugliness — a berm would never be tall enough to lesson the ugly view of an asphalt processing plant, especially considering that the neighborhoods to the east are on an uphill slope and can see everything to the west. As it is now, we can sit out in our yards or on our decks and enjoy the outdoors without much noise , air pollution , and only some businesses' lights impeding the view in the evenings . If this proposal passes, we will not be able to enjoy the outdoors in our yards . EXHIBIT &o3 We know that commercial growth in our area is imminent, but let us PLEASE use wisdom in the type of growth proposed . No one, including the local communities in their 2008 intergovernmental agreement, envision the gateway to Greeley, Windsor, and Johnstown as being a heavy industrial site. If Martin Marietta needs to be near a railroad , a highway, and Wyoming , they need to consider a location farther north . Or continue using their existing plant in Greeley on O Street. Or choose another one of their other 12 possibilities . Please don 't let them ruin another spot with noise and dirt! I beg you to please use wisdom as your guide, and not the potential tax dollars. As the area is developed , we will receive tax dollars, but let us develop it responsibly! Thank you for your consideration , Gary Cooper Indianhead Estates resident 2 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 6:34 PM To: MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Albert Kester 235 Peckham ave New Raymer, co 80742 7- 17-15 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Albert Kester EXHIBIT 1 1 xio 0 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 5:24 PM To: kbkennels5@msn.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Kevin Eskam 43 848 County Road 31 Pierce, Colorado, 80650 7/17/2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Kevin Eskam EXHIBIT 2 XCM Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 7:46 PM To: kathykester@gmail.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Kathy Kester 60851 WCR 104.5 New Raymer, CO 80742 7/17/15 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Kathy Kester EXHIBIT 3 I 8 0 h Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 7:47 PM To: MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Jubal J Kester 60851 WCR 104.5 New Raymer, CO 80742 7/17/15 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Jubal J Kester EXHIBIT 1 4 �/ Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 8: 10 PM To: susiekester@comcast.net Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Susie Kester PO Box 123/68279 WCR 82 New Raymer, CO 80742 7 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Susie Kester EXHIBIT 5 g‘o Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 8:39 PM To: MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Seth Whitlock 101 WCR 129 New Raymer, CO 80742 7-17- 15 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Seth Whitlock EXHIBIT 6 I a Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 8:40 PM To: MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MM Highway 34 Support Form Bob Eiring 34655 mcr 20 Fort Morgan, co 80701 7-1715 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Bob Eiring EXHIBIT 8tm Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.coml Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 8:47 PM To: MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Dennis Kugler 525 Thomas st New Raymer, co 80742 7- 17- 15 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Dennis Kugler EXHIBIT 8 4 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 9:06 PM To: jandjlowe@yahoo.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Jim Lowe 22 centre New Raymer 7-17-15 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Jim Lowe EXHIBIT 9 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 9:07 PM To: jandjlowe@yahoo.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Janet Lowe 22 centre New Raymer 7-17- 15 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Janet Lowe EXHIBIT 10 1 , "l 3 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2015 10:58 AM To: MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Cary Lambert 300 Thomas New Raymer, CO 80742 7- 18-25 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR1 S-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Cary Lambert EXHIBIT 11 1 gr74 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2015 11 :06 AM To: MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Tyler Krager 63440 wcr 86 New Raymer, co 80742 7- 18- 15 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Tyler Krager EXHIBIT �2 875 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2015 2: 16 PM To: MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Esther Block 65005 CR 130 New Raymer, CO 07-18-15 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Esther Block EXHIBIT 13 1 Fqk Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2015 2:46 PM To: c.outlaws21@yahoo.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Casey Nelson 57500 wcr 382 Grover, co 80729 7- 18- 15 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Casey Nelson EXHIBIT 14 gil q Diana Aungst From: MM Highway 34 Support [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 7:49 PM To: MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com EXHIBIT Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form j`/Ec Kester Pump Service 336 1-lyw 14 New Raymer, CO 80742 7/17/15 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR 15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). As a contractor who has 2 employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! 15 Sincerely, Kester Pump Service 16 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2015 4: 13 PM To: MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Doug Deter 68279 wcr 82 New Raymer, CO. 80742 7/18/15 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Doug Deter EXHIBIT griq Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2015 4: 15 PM To: alpbbvb32@msn.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Angie Pancost 34 Tulip Ct. Windsor, CO 80550 7/18/15 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Angie Pancost EXHIBIT 3 SRO Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2015 4: 19 PM To: MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form John sinkler 44132 weld co.rd New raymer 7/18/15 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. 1, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, John sinkler EXHIBIT 2 1 ggl Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2015 4:22 PM To: MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Justin baker 44132 weld co. Road New Raymer co. 80742 7/18/15 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Justin baker EXHIBIT 1 I gag From: Kirk Goble [mailto:kirk@be115.com] Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 11:20 AM To: Diana Aungst Subject: Planning Application USR 15-0027 Weld County Commissioners Weld County Planning Commission c/o Diana Aungst, Planner II Upon review of the application submitted by Martin Marietta Materials USR 15-0027 proposed for a site located south of US 34 in the area of WCR 13, Kelim, and Indian Head Estates, I find the proposed use to be incompatible for numerous reasons: - Impact of traffic on CR 13 and U.S. Hwy. 34. This corridor is already heavily traveling by commuters and other normal commercial traffic. The potential back-ups attributable to the increased truck and train traffic for the MMM operation will impact area residents, commuters, public transportation, and commercial haulers. This factor alone should be enough to deny the application. - Impact to regional planning. The cities of Greeley, Loveland, and Johnstown have cooperatively established development planning that includes residential, recreational, retail, and light manufacturing for the impacted area. This proposed operation is an interruption to and is in conflict with the goals of these entities to make their cities' appearance, entry corridors, conformity, and compatibility work with a variety of users. - Odor and emissions. The increase of odor, emissions, and fugitive dust from this operation will be incompatible with surrounding uses, particularly existing and planned residential communities. The nature of this proposed operation and the traffic, noise, fugitive dust, detrimental impact to municipal entry corridors, and the health, safety, and welfare of the area property owners make this an inappropriate use for this site and the application should be denied in it's entirety. Kirk Goble, ALC Broker, The Bell 5 Land Company 710 11th Avenue #107 Greeley, CO 80631 970-356-1618 kirk@be115.com Accredited Land Consultant REALTORS Land Institute EXHIBIT EXHIBIT To : Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N . 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 970-353-6100 ext 3524 ; Fax: 970-304-6498 daungst@weldgov. com In' r- CFAVED From : Lori Horn JUL 20 2015 Beneficiary in Dale Horn Family Trust vvw county Him. iepac uriznt 1074 Poplar, GREELEY OFFICE Johnstown ( Kelim ) 80534 To : Case # USR 15-0027 My folks have invested many years into making their property which is a stones throw away from the MMM site the haven it has become for our family. They worked hard all their lives to own a place for this purpose and attain a quality of life that they love. My father is 87 and to old to start all over. We are going to great lengths to keep him on his acreage living the farm lifestyle to which he has become accustomed . He has been a farmer all his life and we know that without this little acreage his demise might actually be hasten . Yes, he feels that strongly about it. We are also looking at future generations having the same quality of life we currently have and enjoy with him . My father is my closest living relative in Colorado. I spend lots of time at our family home and we all dread the implications this project will have on the area , our well being and health . I am fervently opposed to the prospect of having a heavy industry plant operating 24/7 in my 87 year old fathers back yard . A plant of this nature is totally incompatible with the surrounding area which is currently zoned to accommodate residential , agricultural and light industry businesses. My father ran a front end loader in a gravel pit for 20 plus years . He' s very familiar with these kinds of plants . I invite you to read his strong objections to the MMM Project in a separate letter he has submitted to you for consideration . He has put this time in absorbing, by necessity, the impact of heavy industry plants and doesn't need to spend his last years imposed upon by that environment. He pays taxes in Larimer county, to live in an environment that he deliberately chose years ago , and should not have to lose his investment and life style for the financial benefit of Weld county. I , he, and other residents of the community don't begrudge Weld county reaping the benefits from business projects. While it is true that his project will create needed jobs. It will unfortunately create jobs of a kind similar to the ones that have resulted in environmental devastation in other small communities around this country and such beautiful places as the amazon. The greatest benefits of this project accrue to this big business and a few locals but at an unacceptable cost to our community at large, and by extension , the rest of the area . In addition to the serious deterioration to the quality of our lives , the Martin Marietta asphalt plant will introduce into the community major health concerns for residents and the livestock they own . There are significant water, air and noise pollution concerns. We will all be negatively affected by the daily, ongoing pollution of over 100 , 000 lbs/annually of associated asphalt dust particles and unpleasant/toxic odors. No one can say for certain that the drinking water (and ground water my Dad uses for his livestock) won 't be affected . No one can guarantee that the asphalt dust particles will not have a negative impact on the lungs of the livestock, my Dad , me or my relatives . No one can be certain that the toxic fumes/odors associated with the asphalt plant won't have a seriously negative affect on the health of family and friends that stay with Dad from time to tim . My parents have lived on this property and in this community since 1990 . On a purely dispassionate note I want tons ay that my Dad's property is also a valuable investment for him in his senior years that can provide income should he need it. As a private caregiver I know the expenses that in-home care costs, not to mention the medical bills associated with old age. It's imperative that his property value hold to cover inevitable future costs . Martin Marietta can afford to build this plant in a more suitable area . All of the folks it will affect in a variety of negative ways cannot afford to relocate. More importantly though , they don 't want to relocate. Also , as a caregiver, I know the detriments to health when you have to endure interrupted sleep. Health and quality of life are greatly impacted . Enduring such inconveniences as these is part of my job of choice, it's really stressful and hard but I ' m compensated for this, they aren 't. Perhaps the greatest impact of this project is the impact it will have on access to highway 34. It is already treacherous getting on and off highway 34 . With the increased traffic, even if managed by CDOT with major mitigation spending , highway 34 will be made more dangerous. I can"t help but think that the increased traffic will adversely impact emergency vehicle response times in the area . It also undoubtedly affect the maintenance highway 34 , 1 -25 and other county roads that border Weld . We as tax payers will be burdened with MMM over use of these roads which cannot help but result in need for more aggressive and frequent repair. Finally, I have done research into industrial noise block. Even if a big berm is created it will not help the noise issue sufficiently. www. acoustiblok. com Even if they can contain the noise from the plant it will do nothing to help noise from trucks and trains. MMM will be able to mitigate some of these issues but not the main ones. Health and safety, quality of life , now and for future generations , and decreased property values. This project will not only affect the families in this area but families and the surrounding areas . It will impact all the traffic that highway 34 and 125 already carry. As a listed beneficiary in the Dale Horn Family Trust, I am committed to not seeing residential and small business property values in this area plummet. It is estimated that the negative impact of this plant will likely decrease neighboring properties by 30-50% . There are other locations within Weld County (the Great Western Industrial Park in Windsor for example) which have all of the infrastructure needed to accommodate the MMM Project - including all railroads-GW, UP and BNSF . I beg of you - please don't approve this proposal . Encourage Martin Marietta to seek one of the other more compatible Weld County sites for their facility. Respectfully submitted , Lori Horn Beneficiary Dale Horn Family Trust To: Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 FCF ! \IFD 970-353-6100 ext 3524; Fax: 970-304-6498 daungst@weldgov.com JUL 20 2015 From: Dale A Horn weld Cmmty Hoititi,sg ,A.pawut►iunt Property Owner GREELEY OFFICE 1074 Poplar, Johnstown (Kelim) 80534 To: Case # USR 15-0027 I have several concerns about the Martin Marietta Materials (MMM) Highway 34 Development. Chief among them is the physiological and emotional stress it is causing the current residents of Weld County_ My family has been living in Larimer County for over 40 years. We have seen Weld County and the surrounding counties change and grow over time. One of the biggest changes has been the increase of traffic along highway 34. As more housing developments and big businesses are installed our ability to safely enter and exit the highway has decreased dramatically. With the addition of MMM Development truck traffic will put my families lives as well as countless other families lives in danger. The surrounding residence of the proposed building sight for the MMM Development will have to constantly contend with truck, rock grinding , train , and generator noise that the asphalt plant will create 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. Many of these residences, including my grandparents, are over 70 years of age and rely on the tranquility of the air space surrounding their land to maintain optimum health_ The proposed building site is quite literally a quarter of a mile from my family's property. I understand that MM has air quality control provisions associated with the development however there is no way MM can control the amount of air pollution that will accompany the trucks, trains and plant including but not limited to: dust, exhaust, odor and mineral waste. I implore you to vote no to the Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development. While this project will create occupation opportunities, the cost of having a large asphalt plant in Weld County is too high for the surrounding counties, its inhabitants and their quality of life. Sincerely, Ashley Betton 1074 Poplar Street Johnstown, CO 80534 EXHIBIT • RECFAVED Debra Fillion JUL 20 2015 1954 Vista Dr. Loveland, CO 80538 Weld County Planning D partm - GREELEY OFFICE July 10, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld C4-:....IT:: Commissioners, _' wr .ng :his ;ce- to •et you know that I do not support the Martin Marietta Highway34 Project. My main objection is that Martin Marietta cannot guarantee adequate protection and promote the health, safety, convenience and general welfare of the present and future residences of the county as sited in the Weld County regulation, Uses by Special Review. The health and safety of the community will certainly be compromised as increased toxins will be put in the air not only by the building and operation of the facility but also the increased traffic on Highway 34 and increased railroad usage. Highway 34 is already a dangerous traffic flow because the infrastructure has not been updated to handle today's volume. Adding more construction trucks, freight trucks and vendor trucks certainly does not promote safety as there are accidents on this highway almost daily. Highway 34 is inconvenient today for many commuters and will only worsen with the addition of Martin Marietta's facility. The trains are also a current issue with the increased usage from Vestas. This issue of trains blocking intersections and blaring horns at all hours has not yet been resolved. How can we justify adding more deterrents to a current problem. I am a strong supporter of economic growth for Northern Colorado but I cannot get behind this project. It is not a good fit for the quality of life we so value in this area. We should not go down the road of allowing our community to become much like Commerce City. I hope you will consider the negative impact this will have on all of Northern Colorado. Sincerely, 65-11V6 Debra Fillion EXHIBIT in d a gsf, RECFJVED Case # USR 15-0027 For Public Record JUL 20 2015 Weld County Weld County Commissioners GREELEY ELEYOF ing Department OFFICE Attn: Diana Aungst, AICP. CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N . 17th Avenue Greeley. Colorado 80631 Re: Planning Application USR 15-0027 : Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development- OPPOSED Weld County Commissioners: My name is John Cooney and I live on Golden Fields Lane which is just east of WCR 13 and just north of Highway 34 in Larimer County. I want to go on record that I am strongly opposed to the proposed development by Martin Marietta Materials just east and south of my property for a number of reasons. Highway 34 is already congested with traffic and this would just add to it. I'm also worried about the inevitable air pollution that would go along with this. I have asthma as well as one of my three small children and one of the reasons we live out in the country is for the fresh air. This would be at risk if you approve their request. Please take pity on the residents of this area, especially the folks in Indian Head Estates. This facility would be completely inappropriate in this residential/ agricultural area. Please deny this inconsiderate USR permit application. Thank you. Sincerely. John Cooney 8466 Golden Fields Lane Loveland. Co 80538 (970)412-6142 C\4\ikA EXHIBIT b g817 Martin Marietta RECEIVED Cottonwood Pit JUL 20 2015 2002 WCR 20 % Weld County Planning Department GREELEY OFFICE Longmont, Co 80504 July 15, 2015 To: Diana Aungst, I would like to say putting in a Martin Marietta Plant on Hy 34 would be a very good idea . I have worked for this company for a little over a year now. They believe in taking care of land, community, and safety is a very high priority. I believe that putting in a plant at a central location would help with jobs, building, road repairs, landscaping ect This plant would be a win win situation for a!! of Northern Colorado. hank you for your time. Sincerely Rose Mammenga Cottonwood Pit 303-621-4340 Phone 303834-3369 Work EXHIBIT :egg [Your Name} ae i • L7enie# [Street Address] freY • /4 g __ P IV J D [City, ST ZIP Code] j ',V� • 966 /6 [Date] JUL7/0/�5--- 20 2015 Weld County Planning pay anent Weld County Commissioners GREELEY OFFICE c/ Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, r �R/• [Your Name] EXHIBIT 1.58-O GQ y0 en 1-5- P.RFCF \ipi) 7r )° ~` JUL 20 2015 1'►JJ County Planni: g ffa, [meritWeld County Commissioners GREELEY OFFICE c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). l understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. i, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be Imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, _Sr EXHIBIT 5 � � 1 jobA 5431 w 2,4 s-t- gel 6reelrj, Cv $'©!93 �I 7/24/i risr JUL 2 0 2o� Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Plarini:1 Z GhEELEY '��13; fn" Weld County Planning OFFICE 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027) . I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, EXHIBIT r . J1 5o ca. Sa- r.„ c1W S(.o3M l,1/4) . ZC,4rb F,oact4 CirceifiA/1 Co 606) RECFIVrin 7/ 2L /is JUL 20 2015 Weld County Planning pupil trrlt;ilt Weld County Commissioners GREELEY OFF-ICE c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027) . I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I , however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between,two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, -, 6 3CUCC,a[Your Name] Name] EXHIBIT 3 ,s- [Your Name] o. t' ?i Cron [Street Address] t,tt1? t V3o�.)0t�_ [City, ST ZIP Code) & (-Nat Sex- C) w°46) [Date] q Lot, k5itifrfl rest Weld County Commissioners JUL 20 2015 c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027) Weld County Plannita Dopai'trn"i Weld County Planning GREELEY OFFICE 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, [Your Name] EXHIBIT [Your Name) live leyn 4. O- [Street Address) 6 2 s £ 14 * c-I- [City, ST ZIP Code) .Each) A Gb T6b1s Pt!: . ,�� ",(Date) ) .-.� - 15 JUL 202015 Weld County Commissioners Ntanni;;5 Liericsament c/o Diana Aungst (USR1S-0027 ) Wewd coun1Y Of FtCE GREELEY Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17'h Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, 1 am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR1 S-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, • [Your Name) EXHIBIT [Your Name ) ifie,16 ,-7, -y-71 (Street Address) 62 C ge Z ec s6 RC( f�• t[City, S7 ZIP Code) ©� �' �' 1 ' fi It , ` n [Date) goovr , f� , •r � ,� L20201 Weld County Commissioners 7.___mt Weld County planning�g Z rt„1i;r1( ;,i c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) G1 EELEY Ul � f�E Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, f am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027 ). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials . Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances, I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ? Sincerely, /4a/ [Your Name] EXHIBIT got 5 [Yoer Name] J}O St,..5 C\VatEx_ASQA-k [Street Address] s1- g \<oIUi_r c ms (RA_ [City, ST ZIP Code] K�5�-+ • � [Date] � 11O / ohs REcEIVED Weld County Commissioners JUL 20 2015 c/o Diana Aungst ( USR1S-0027) V Weld County Planning • ELEYS P Weld CGREnOE:FICE�tmen 1555 N . 17th Avenue Greeley, Co 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta' s Highway 34 Project ( USR1S • 0027 ) . I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. -he project site is located between two active railroads arid very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of prosect Our community will benefit horn the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the cont<nued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances . I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, 1 [Your Name] EXHIBIT ISig tO [Your Name] 7e ,..t,e,rehai,r [Street Address] 411 70G/ o girt- [City, ST ZIP Code] o -e-/mo, C © tc63i t <'rr '�' :` '- [Date] JUL 20 201 Weld County Commissioners Weld County Planning Bcf2itinent c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) GtiEELEY OFFICE Weld County Planning • 1555 N . 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: • As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR?5-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The ' project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well } suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, (Your Name] • EXHIBIT 8Pi [Your Namej '~G�� vt:l\o S 'r [Street Address) S1OLi w - [City, ST ZIP Code ] . cir. e-e1�ev co g 3j prrrfl ' FD[Date] ,a ,i JUL 20 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USP,'1S-0027) Weld County Pianning Geiiortment GREELEY OFFICE Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17`'' Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners• As a resident of Weld County, j am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USP,1S-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response] Sincerely, (Your Namej EXHIBIT I89 r [Your Name] [Street Address] [City, ST ZIP Code] [Date] �_ ; �� JUL 20 2 5 Weld County Commissioners Weld County Phn,�>;;�r� r�own�,;; c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) GF;EE�EY Ol: rl�'E Weld County Planning 1555 N . 17`h Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, i am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR1S-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances . I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, Cott 1---e Attu t ., t f4S•1≤ree o �! [Your Name] 67Aere 47/ CC) TO6 • EXHIBIT gqq t •W SPRO SLJ .a►EI% Efl July 20, 2015 IC v l :E Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR1S-0027) t„ Weld County Planning J�1 20 p5 1555 N. 17th Avenue Weld County Phnni,;,, Greeley, CO 80631 GF;EELEY Qfr.p Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). As a contractor who has 200 employees, the success of our business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for our business to deliver materials to our customers in a cost effective manner, while reducing our carbon footprint — the closer building materials are to projects, the less fuel we burn . If these materials are not readily available, it will have a detrimental impact to our business and our employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. The location also minimizes heavy truck traffic on secondary roads. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While we recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, Michael Dempsey Chief Financial Officer Transpro Burgener Trucking 7301 SW Frontage Road Suite 3 Fort Collins, CO 80254 EXHIBIT From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [mailto: MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 2:40 PM To: MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MM Highway 34 Support Form Leonard Kechter 3757 Celtic Ln Ft Collins 07/20/2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Leonard Kechter EXHIBIT Hilary Anderson Schafer Attorney at Law RFCEIVFT) 1824 Little Raven Street • Denver, CO 80202 JULr 21 2��5 970.396.5012 • handerson5280@gmail.com Weld County Planning Oki]: GREELEY OFFICE July 16, 2015 SENT VIA US MAIL AND EMAIL TO: daungst@weldgov.com Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner I Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 North 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development Dear Ms. Aungst: This letter is my formal objection to the proposed Martin Marietta Materials (MMM) development south of Highway 34 and east of WCR 13 in Weld County (the "Proposed Development"). I strongly oppose the Proposed Development due to the negative impacts it will have on the individuals who live, work, and travel through this area. My parents live in the Indian Head Estates subdivision adjacent to the Proposed Development and settled in this area for the quality of life — a peaceful, close-knit community, where traffic does not rival downtown Denver, the air is cleaner, kids play outside, and families and friends can enjoy simpler things in life. I visit this area several times a month with my husband and four- month old son. The manufacturing and recycling process of aggregates and asphalt, industrial air emissions, odor, and fugitive dust emissions that will result from the Proposed Development pose a threat to my family and me and all those who live and work in this area. Should the Proposed Development be approved, I fear for my parents', my children's, and my health. Martin Marietta has yet to prove that its processes and manufacturing are safe, and for this very reason, I and many others will opt to live and visit other areas of Colorado. The Proposed Development is also inconsistent with the surrounding area and would be better suited in an area already zoned for industrial use, such as those I2 zones near Milliken and Windsor. I have seen the impacts of industrial businesses in residential areas — the residents leave, local and retail businesses relocate, and the area slowly becomes that of a highway for those passing by. No one stays. The Proposed Development will impair property values and thwart further residential and retail development. Finally, the Proposed Development will severely compromise public safety due to increased traffic (1129 vehicle trips to 2260 vehicle trips daily). Highway 34 already experiences heavy traffic and congestion. Numerous times I have chosen to take side roads to navigate the area to avoid the congestion and dangerous intersections. The Proposed Development will make traffic exponentially worse. I encourage the members of the Commission to put themselves in the shoes of those individuals and families who live and work in the area of the Proposed Development and ask themselves whether they EXHIBIT would want the Proposed Development impacting their family, friends, and neighbors. Please reject the Proposed Development. I would sincerely appreciate if you could please acknowledge, by return email, that you have received this letter and that it has been incorporated into the Public Record and the respective packets for the Board of County Commissioners. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Ililary A. Schafer, Esq. RFCF ! VFD To - Weld County Planning Commission and Weld County Commissioners JUL 212015 Re - Martin Marietta Materials USR 15-0027 Weld County Planning Department From - S. Collins, Resident of Indianhead Estates subdivision GREELEY OFFICE July 16, 2015 This is a follow-up to my previously submitted letter #539, in which I expressed concern about the potential for catastrophic industrial accidents at the proposed Martin Marietta Hwy 34 Project facilities. Upon reviewing the updated USR section on "Secondary emergency access," various referral comments, applicant's responses to them, new facility design plans, and the Planning Staff's report, I perceive even more causes for concern: 1) The entire proposed facility appears to be on an unstable footing. Collapse of any part could initiate a fire or explosion in many ways: a) Front Range Fire Rescue's preferred secondary emergency access road connecting to WCR 56 was called "not feasible" by MM (5/29/15) because "the railroad on the property is constructed on a berm and on the south end it is elevated about 20 feet from existing grade." "The costs of going over or under this railroad make it not feasible." (MM again placing it's expenses over safety). HAVING RAIL SEGMENTS ELEVATED ON A MAN-MADE BERM ADDS INSTABILITY AND INCREASES DERAILMENT RISK. Since the Great Western Railway has not submitted referral comments, would they even agree to this plan, for safety and liability reasons? b) All vehicular traffic is now planned to enter and exit on a bridge over the rail line since "a train will be on the rail loop spur a great deal of the time." But the secondary emergency access will cross the rail spur "when the bridge is not accessible." Why wouldn't the bridge always be accessible? And how could emergencies be serviced if there is simultaneously a train on the rail loop, blocking emergency access? MM has said there will only be 2-3 trains per week bringing aggregate from Wyoming - so why will there be a train on the spur "a great deal of the time?" Perhaps this is another discrepancy between MM's alleged plans and actuality. Can the bridge support the weight of 14-15 ton trucks with loads of 30-43 tons each? Especially since it would apparently need to be 2 lanes wide to accommodate trucks entering and exiting, thereby doubling the weight? As I commented in letter #539, anything on a bridge can fall off of it - adding potential for many types of accident risks at the various plant facilities; especially with thousands of truck trips per day and risk of vehicular traffic - and occupants - falling off the bridge onto a train. Will trucking contractors, owner-operators and the railroad company agree to this, for safety and liability reasons? EXHIBIT c) Reports concerning problematic water and ditch management on site have been submitted by several companies and MM has acknowledged that the water table can extend to within 3-4 feet of the surface, so the entire facility "will be almost entirely built on fill." In combination with relevant factors specific to Weld County cited in the Northeast Colorado Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan (possible land subsidence from fracking under the site, old mines in the "I-25 corridor" 350- 400 feet underground - many of which are unmapped), heavy truck and train vibrations, and the absence of a geological survey or coordinated planning with current land users (oil/gas companies) and civil engineers, one wonders if the proposed MM facility "has a leg to stand on." 2) One point of clarification: in the Planning Staff report one of the comments (apparently referencing my letter #539) mentioned that "homes to the west would be sandblasted by winds." This already occurs in Indianhead Estates (Chinook + Great Plains winds = 70-165 mph potential); an example of a natural hazard almost unique to this specific area, which does not respect codes and regulations. My point was that an MM facility at the proposed site would be subject to the same phenomena. Case #6 in Appendix #2 (letter #539) was an example of an accident which resulted when an asphalt plant was impacted by "only" a 40 mph wind which displaced hot fines, causing a fire and explosion. 3) I noted with interest that a number of the MM form letters in support of the USR had only a signature - some almost illegible - without an address. Did such signers understand the content of the form letter? How many of them were MM employees fearing job loss? I was very happy to see the recommendation in the Planning Staff' report that USR 15-0027 be denied. "The Department of Planning Services believes that the negative impacts are such that there are no conditions that could be placed on this USR that would ensure the compatibility with the surrounding, existing land uses" (page 10 of 18). This conclusion is consistent with the respect for individual liberties that has encouraged migration to this great State throughout its history and with the mission statement of the Planning/Zoning Department, to protect and enhance the quality of life for County residents, businesses and property owners, through response to citizen concerns. I'm proud to be a resident of Weld County. Respectfully submitted, ahcz4a-20 e, _Eashui.) , nvarE42 Sharon L. Collins, MD, FACS 27811 Hopi Trl, Johnstown, CO 80534 RECEiVED ' JUL 212015 Amy Dyer Weld County Planning Department GREELEY OFFICE 10757 N. Prima Dr. Fort Collins, CO 80524 July 17, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- OO27). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, oUree---- Amy Dyer EXHIBIT 07/ 21 / 2015 12 : 06 16192382411 OFFICE DEPOT 934 PAGE 02/ 03 Personal Sta ;ement To: Weld Co inty Planning Commissioners c/o Diana At ngst e a + `Z., wish to go on the record to express my strong opposition to Pp the Martin Marietta Materials "Highway 34 Project' which will be considered at the Planning Commission I fearing on July 21, 2O15, While I wish lo attend the hearing and express my concerns in person, I will not be able to do so because: ain CA-j-trrt-‘ki D Ca. e c\ i. rc c c� k',-, C,� . a • e_NA , ,Nc Please accept my apology for my absence and recommend DENIAL of the project application on my behalf, Signature: -- Date: -- r �� ` 5 Address: G. I .rbey>m ar..�l� �� r,5 34-- EXHIBIT @7:' 21x' 2015 12 : 86 16192352411 OFFICE DEPOT 934 PAGE 03/ 03 Personal Star ement To: Weld Co tnty Planning Commissioners c/o Diana AL ngst i' KI 14. i MeAs2't e2_ wish to go on the record to express E� my strong opposition to the Martin M trietta Materials "Highway 34 Project' which will be considered at the Planning Commission I tearing on July 21, 2015. While I wish t a attend the hearing and express my concerns in person, I will not be able to do so because: cc aT % .� . e_.v- c,' a `- t 9 \ - .. ) k o \r•ie-\cka fl trA v-, ; n - -'-e-- :C Sri ceS. i �� e �,c� �,,�Q t S •t c) h Please accept ' rty apology for my absence and recommend DENIAL of the project application on my behalf, Signature; ' t - Date: 51 12-- I Address: 4 S 1 vim. bero3 4 • EXHIBIT _Sao To : Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N . 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 970-353-6100 ext 3524; Fax : 970-304-6498 daungst@weldgov.com From : Lori Horn Beneficiary in Dale Horn Family Trust 1074 Poplar, Johnstown (Kelim) 80534 To : Case # US R 15-0027 My folks have invested many years into making their property which is a stones throw away from the MMM site the haven it has become for our family. They worked hard all their lives to own a place for this purpose and attain a quality of life that they love. My father is 87 and to old to start all over. We are going to great lengths to keep him on his acreage living the farm lifestyle to which he has become accus- tomed . He has been a farmer all his life and we know that without this little acreage his demise might actually be hasten . Yes, he feels that strongly about it. We are also looking at future generations hav- ing the same quality of life we currently have and enjoy with him . My father is my closest living relative in Colorado. 1 spend lots of time at our family home and we all dread the implications this project will have on the area, our well being and health . I am fervently opposed to the prospect of having a heavy industry plant operating 24/7 in my 87 year old fathers back yard . A plant of this nature is totally incompatible with the surrounding area which is currently zoned to accommodate residential , agricultural and light in- dustry businesses. EXHIBIT 19,0 My father ran a front end loader in a gravel pit for 20 plus years. He's very familiar with these kinds of plants. I invite you to read his strong objections to the MMM Project in a separate letter he has submitted to you for consideration . He has put this time in absorbing, by neces- sity, the impact of heavy industry plants and doesn 't need to spend his last years imposed upon by that environment. He pays taxes in Larimer county, to live in an environment that he deliberately chose years ago, and should not have to lose his investment and life style for the financial benefit of Weld county. I , he, and other residents of the community don 't begrudge Weld county reaping the benefits from business projects . While it is true that his project will create needed jobs. It will unfortunately create jobs of a kind similar to the ones that have resulted in environmental devastation in other small communi- ties around this country and such beautiful places as the amazon. The greatest benefits of this project accrue to this big business and a few locals but at an unacceptable cost to our community at large, and by extension , the rest of the area. In addition to the serious deterioration to the quality of our lives, the Martin Marietta asphalt plant will introduce into the community major health concerns for residents and the livestock they own . There are significant water, air and noise pollution concerns. We will all be negatively affected by the daily, ongoing pollution of over 100,000 lbs/ annually of associated asphalt dust particles and unpleasant/toxic odors. No one can say for certain that the drinking water (and ground water my Dad uses for his livestock) won 't be affected . No one can guarantee that the asphalt dust particles will not have a negative im- pact on the lungs of the livestock, my Dad, me or my relatives . No one can be certain that the toxic fumes/odors associated with the as- phalt plant won 't have a seriously negative affect on the health of family and friends that stay with Dad from time to tim . My parents have lived on this property and in this community since 1990. On a purely dispassionate note I want tons ay that my Dad 's property is also a valuable investment for him in his senior years that can pro- vide income should he need it. As a private caregiver I know the ex- penses that in-home care costs, not to mention the medical bills as- sociated with old age. It's imperative that his property value hold to cover inevitable future costs. Martin Marietta can afford to build this plant in a more suitable area. All of the folks it will affect in a variety of negative ways cannot afford to relocate. More importantly though, they don't want to relocate. Also, as a care- giver, I know the detriments to health when you have to endure inter- rupted sleep. Health and quality of life are greatly impacted . Endur- ing such inconveniences as these is part of my job of choice, it's real- ly stressful and hard but I 'm compensated for this, they aren 't. Perhaps the greatest impact of this project is the impact it will have on access to highway 34. It is already treacherous getting on and off highway 34. With the increased traffic, even if managed by CDOT with major mitigation spending , highway 34 will be made more dan- gerous. I can"t help but think that the increased traffic will adversely impact emergency vehicle response times in the area. It also un- doubtedly affect the maintenance highway 34, 1-25 and other county roads that border Weld . We as tax payers will be burdened with MMM over use of these roads which cannot help but result in need for more aggressive and frequent repair. Finally, I have done research into industrial noise block. Even if a big berm is created it will not help the noise issue sufficiently. www. a- coustiblok. com Even if they can contain the noise from the plant it will do nothing to help noise from trucks and trains. MMM will be able to mitigate some of these issues but not the main ones. Health and safety, quality of life, now and for future genera- tions, and decreased property values. This project will not only affect the families in this area but families and the surrounding areas. It will impact all the traffic that highway 34 and 1 25 already carry. As a listed beneficiary in the Dale Horn Family Trust, I am committed to not seeing residential and small business property values in this area plummet. It is estimated that the negative impact of this plant will likely decrease neighboring properties by 30-50%. There are other locations within Weld County (the Great Western In- dustrial Park in Windsor for example) which have all of the in- frastructure needed to accommodate the MMM Project - including all railroads-GW, UP and BNSF. I beg of you - please don't approve this proposal . Encourage Martin Marietta to seek one of the other more compatible Weld County sites for their facility. Respectfully submitted , r- 4tf, / 1. 164) Lori Horn Beneficiary Dale Horn Family Trust To : Weld County Commissioners do Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N . 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 970-353-6100 ext 3524; Fax: 970-304-6498 daungst(a2weldgov. com From: Alan Lee Horn Resident 1074 Poplar, Johnstown (Kelim) 80534 To: Case # USR 15-0027 I am strongly opposed to the Martin Marietta Materials (MMM) Highway 34 Development. The primary concern I have is that a heavy industry plant of this nature is incompatible with the surrounding area zoned for residential, agricultural and light industry businesses. My secondary concern is in regard to the PM (Particulate Matter) that will be emitted from the MMM plant. According to the formal report by the World Health Organization in January, 2003, the following is cited: Question: Which effects can be expected of long-term exposure to levels of PM (Particulate Matter) observed currently in Europe (include both clinical and pre-clinical effects, e.g . development of respiratory system)? Answer: Long-term exposure to current ambient PM concentrations may lead to a marked reduction in life expectancy. The reduction in life expectancy is primarily due to increased cardio-pulmonary and lung cancer mortality. Increases are likely in lower respiratory symptoms and reduced lung function in children, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and reduced lung function in adults. Source: Health Aspects of Air Pollution with Particulate Matter, Ozone and Nitrogen Dioxide Report on a Woad Health Organization Working Group. Bonn, Germany 13- 15 January 2003 Thank you for your consideration . Respectfully, i ___-------------..,\ Alan Lee Horn Resident EXHIBIT 190gw To: Weld County Commissioners do Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N . 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 970-353-6100 ext 3524; Fax: 970-304-6498 daungstcweldgov. com From : D. Kay Brunmeier Resident 1074 Poplar, EXHIBIT Johnstown (Kelim) 80534 aCIS__ To: Case # USR 15-0027 I am strongly opposed to the Martin Marietta Materials (MMM) Highway 34 Development. A heavy industry plant of this nature is totally incompatible with the surrounding area zoned for residential, agricultural and light industry businesses. I moved into this residence three years ago for the fresh air, serenity, and the beauty this area brings. I enjoy living in this historical agricultural area with farms dating back to the 1850's. I am comfortable with the light industrial businesses that have filled in some of the surrounding area but the MMM project will not be like the light industrial business are accustomed to but an entirely unacceptable land use change. The proposed MMM plant will in fact introduce into this very safe community hazards that can result in the destruction of my current way of life with noise, hazardous dust particles , and toxic odors . The plant will disrupt the serenity of my sleep; deteriorate the quality of the air I breathe. I enjoy the quiet morning sunrises, the bird's singing in the early morning and the bray of our donkey. All that will be gone with a 24/7 heavy industrial plant nearby. Of particular concern is the impact this will have on the livestock and their environment, some of which is raised on this property and used for subsistence, and on the ground water the livestock drink. Even if that doesn't happen overnight, the water could ultimately be affected . lam also concerned about hazardous emissions and toxic fumes/odors associated with an asphalt plant. My companion is 87 years old and we have small great-grand children that are accustomed to feeding the livestock and riding the ponies. We will all be negatively affected by the daily, ongoing pollution of over 100,000 lbs/annually of associated asphalt dust particles, unpleasant/toxic odors and noise. Of paramount concern is access to/from our home. I can't imagine what it will be like to have an increase of more than 800 trucks daily on WCR 13. We already have a hard time accessing Highway 34. This increase also brings additional safety risks to me and all the farmers, bikers, equestrians and pedestrians that use WCR 13. I also feel it could impede the arrival of emergency vehicles when needed . The increased noise level is also an issue. The hours of proposed operation , 24 hours/ 7 days a week and 365 days a year are unacceptable and intolerable. There will be an increase of noise from all aspects of the facility operations: backup alarms, heavy conveyor belt operations, idling trucks, heavy equipment operations, train operations, unloading and loading operations, etc. Add to that the increased noise of train traffic by Great Western and Union Pacific. There are other locations within Weld County (the Great Western Industrial Park in Windsor for example) which have all of the infrastructure needed - including all railroads-GW, UP and BNSF. As a resident, I implore you, please vote no on this proposal, and encourage Martin Marietta to seek one of the other more compatible Weld County sites for their facility. Respectfully submitted , ,(9, 1( )17-S:yam' D. Kay Brunmeier Diana Aungst From: Amanda Hutchinson [amandarae.hutchinson@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 21 , 2015 4:09 AM To: Diana Aungst Subject: usr 15-0027 Concerned Citizen Letter Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Case # USR 15-0027 For Public Record July 19, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 970-353-6100 ext 3524; Fax: 970-304-6498 daungst@weldgov.com Weld County Commissioners: RE: Planning Applications USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development I am writing in regards to the proposed asphalt/concrete plant by Martin Marietta. My husband and I live directly south of where this plant is proposed to be built. We have been following all of the information provided by Martin Marietta as well as the community and hired experts. It has become apparent that Martin Marietta has only one objective and that is NOT hearing the concerns of neighbors, but in running over anyone in their way to complete this plant as quickly as possible. I have read all of the provided information, application, rebuttals, referrals, etc, and after reading the application itself I am VERY concerned at the amount of misinformation, misleading lines regarding very important aspects of this plan. Any literate person with half a brain could easily point out all of the questionable flaws buried in the proposed application! The fact of the matter is, there are no mitigation efforts that could be set into place that would do a sufficient job in controlling odors, dust pollution, exhaust pollution from the many trucks up and down the road and through the facility, chemical pollution from the batch plant (if it really is a batch plant, sounds more like a continuous plant to me). This site is on a sloping grade to the south, meaning, a sloping grade straight toward our house and garden. The water table here is VERY high, My husband dug a hole to plant a tree a few weeks ago and we hit water at 3 ft! So how on earth can Martin Marietta guarantee that our well water, or that of our neighbors, or the water we use to irrigate our large organic market garden won't be contaminated by the run off from their plant? They can't! Unless they plan on pouring in a facility wide tub to set the whole place in. Do you see that happening? I Don't.. It will leak down the hill to our property, to Bill BoegIi's property and straight into the Koenig resevoir where the fish and waterfoul get to play in it. I'm not going to cover all the same points that everyone else has already so eloquently presented to you in their letters. I do hope you take each of the formal Martin Marietta form letters in support of this plan with a grain of salt. I visited the MM website pertaining to this proposal and they have cleverly devised a link where anyone from anywhere can submit their own pre-drafted email in support and have it emailed directly to your office. I wonder how many of those folks will be smelling the asphalt as it's being processed daily? How many of those supporters live in the area...even 20 miles from this disgusting plant? How many of them will have to spray off their beautiful flowers and gardens to wash off the cement dust every evening? How many will have to hear roaring trains with wheels squealing and locking all day long (and night)? How many of these daily commuters on highway 34 would really support this idea if they knew this was going on? Not many I'd bet. Please deny this application and let's send the message that Weld County is a "Right to Farm" county and will always be. There are places for farms and places for big dirty industrial asphalt plants. This is a place to keep agricultural. Thank you, EXHIBIT 1 1 s Amanda Mills ps please let me know youve received this, lye tried emailing this 3 times now Sent from Gmail Mobile 2 Diana Aungst From: Adam Mills [adammillsdc@outlook.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 21 , 2015 9:49 AM To: Diana Aungst Subject: Asphalt Concern Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Hello Diana, My name is Adam and I am writing you to voice my concern about the potential location of the asphalt plant that may be built. I can not begin to express my concern about this inappropriate use of the land. Growing up in rural Colorado I understand the importance of agriculture. This plant would displace families that have been making a living off of the land for years, and that is terrible. Also my wife and I are both medical professionals and this plant is very concerning, because of its potential location next to a large community. The harm to public health is a worry of ours. I urge everyone that has a vote in this process to think about all the families that will be affected if this plant in built. Thank you for your time and have a good day. EXHIBIT 1 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 21 , 2015 10:44 AM To: MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Mary Ann Sheetz 37035 Soaring Eagle Circle Severance, CO 80550 07/20/15 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Mary Ann Sheetz EXHIBIT 1 Diana Aungst From: Marcella [cilly.celly@gmail.comj Sent: Tuesday, July 21 , 2015 11 :10 AM To: Diana Aungst Subject: Hwy 34 plan opposition letter Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged To: Weld County Commisioners Fr: Marcella Lunt Re: Hwy 34 Development Plan To Whom it may Concern, I am writing to state my strong opposition to Martin Marietta Materials Hwy 34 Development Plan. I live close to the facility and my family will be directly impacted by the proposed asphalt plant. I have a child with environmental allergies that will likely be impacted by the plant, even if air quality standards are met. I drive Hwy 34 daily. I can see Hwy 34 from my home. Any train or traffic hazard that occurs on Hwy 34 can back up and stop traffic for miles. Adding a traffic light and a significant increase in truck traffic will increase this occurrence and make Hwy 34 more dangerous for all commuters. My family (my husband, myself, and our two children, ages 9 & 10) bike the roads south of Hwy 34, including WCR 13 . Increased truck traffic would not only cause much dust, but it would render this area unsafe for us to commute by bicycle. I can list several more concerns but the bottom line is that this proposal is bad for Johnstown, Windsor, Greeley and all of Weld County. There are several industrial areas on railroad tracks in Weld County that would better serve Martin Marietta Materials and our communities. Thank you for your consideration. Marcella Lunt 6895 AlgonQuin Dr Loveland, CO 80534 EXHIBIT 1 Ct Diana Aungst Subject: FW: Aggregate location From: Kevin Binder [mailto: binderbuilding@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 9:03 PM To: Julie Cozad Cc: scott fenton55@msn.com EXHIBIT Subject: Aggregate location Dear Commissioner Cozad: _SA__ My name is Kevin Binder. My family moved to Loveland in 1957. I moved back into the area in 1989. My father was a general contractor in Northern Colorado starting in 1971 . I joined him in 1999 and I have owned my general contractor business in for 15 years. I have built homes all over Weld County, Greeley, Larimer County and Loveland. I would like to take just a moment of your time and "weigh-in" on the proposed aggregate business in the WCR 13 and Highway 34 area. Several years ago I purchased lots in Indian Head Estates and built 6 custom homes for great families. In fact, I am building a detached garage on Algonquin Drive at this time. Each one of these families have remained friends with me to this day. One of the wonderful features of the area is that it is close to many amenities of Northern Colorado, but has that "rural feel". The views, the quiet, the clean surroundings are a part of the atmosphere of Indian Head Estates. The proposed gravel transfer station has no place in that area. Now we all know that our area is growing by leaps and bounds. 1 especially know that frustration of not having building materials to complete my projects for my families. But I implore you to take another look at what this business will do to the families and future look of the area. Highway 34 between Greeley and Loveland has become a very nice "gateway" to Rocky Mountain Park. Thousands of tourists travel that highway and have a great view of the Rockies growing before their eyes. As one drives west from Greeley, the mountains just grow to their majesty. A gravel pit or gravel trucks should not be in the picture. Please don't get me wrong. I am not against the business. In fact we need to have it. Since the flood of 2013, many of the aggregate pits have been closed. Some were close to being finished and the flood was their end. Others simply closed to outside customers (Colson in Larimer county) and has left many builders and others to drive to Brighton. Very expensive. Speaking of Brighton, have you driven down Hwy 85 in the Brighton to Denver area? It is very congested with gravel tracks and can be dangerous. Not a good mix with tourists seeing the Rocky Mountains for possibly the first time. The views may distract and cause an accident. Just saying. Please DO NOT allow the aggregate business, and spin off businesses, to be built in the WCR 13 proposed site. 1 Sincerely, Kevin Binder, President Binder Building, Inc. 2 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 21 , 2015 5:22 PM To: MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Christina Dominick 725 Carbon Erie, CO 80516 July 21 , 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Christina Dominick EXHIBIT Leslie Todrzak 1543 2nd St. SW Loveland, CO 970-800-1600 slmtod@axint.net July 19, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USRI 5-0027) Greeley, CO 80631 Weld County Commissioners, 1 am writing you to express my sincere opposition with regards to Martin Marietta's Highway 34 project (USRI 5-0027). The land this company is attempting to have rezoned for heavy industrial use, located between Highway 34 and Weld County Road 13 is currently designated as agricultural/residential and should remain as such. I understand there are some who have expressed their support of this project, however, I feel it will only impose a plethora of negative consequences on our community that will far outweigh any potential benefits. I understand and admire Weld County's positive and accommodating attitude towards healthy and sustainable growth however, I believe Martin Marietta's project will only preclude the already rapid expansion our region is currently undergoing. With substantial retail and residential growth in the area, I am deeply concerned this type of industrial business will only hinder further expansion as it will bog down already congested roadways with large commercial vehicles, create unbearable noise and air pollution, and significantly impose on the area's natural beauty. This facility would also be built dangerously close to existing homes and neighborhoods, and I worry about the adverse health implications these individuals and their families may suffer. I urge you to consider the many negative implications Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project would impose on the citizens, the environment, as well as the healthy and sustainable growth of out region and ask that you adamantly deny this project. Sincerely, Leslie C. Todrzak EXHIBIT UPSTATECOLORADO ECONOMIC DF_VEI..ot'MEN r 970.356.4565 phone 970.352 2436 fax 800.320 8578 toll free 822 Seventh Street, Suite 550 Weld County Commissioners Greeley, atC 80or 1 www upstatecolorado.org c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027 Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley,CO 80631 Dear County Commissioners, On behalf of the Board of Directors at Upstate Colorado Economic Development Corporation we are writing to express our support for the creation of primary jobs and the support of the necessary operations that will help build out our infrastructure in northern Colorado. We encourage an effective solution to developing a strong transportation network, affordable housing, a robust business environment and stronger communities. We hope that as you work with existing Weld County businesses you will support their efforts to grow and expand as appropriate. Martin Marietta has been a primary sector employer with production plants located in and around Weld County for years and has employed close to 300 people in northern Colorado Communities. Continuing this trend, their new operation would bring $20 million dollars' worth of investment and approximately 100 new jobs to the community. While the employment opportunities are most certainly an exciting aspect of this operation, Weld County is in great need of such aggregates to support the current and future growth we are experiencing. Upstate Colorado supports the need for these type of building material supply chain operations in Weld County and have been in communication with the Company as it looks to appropriately site its operations. We look forward to providing further assistance at the company request and County officials deem appropriate. Regards, Tom Haren Board Chairman Upstate Colorado Economic Development Corporation EXHIBIT i 417 Supporting Job Opportunities in Greeley and Weld County Communities Janet Larson 27575 Hopi Trail Johnstown, CO 80534 Diana Aungst Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greely,ly, CO 80631 July 16, 2015 Dear Ms. Aungst, I am writing in reference to the land west of Indianhead and IHW and the concerns I have with the industrial development and rezoning proposal by Martin Marietta. We own a house that borders that property and are very concerned about the development that is currently being considered . There have been many concerns brought to the table and discussed in the various meetings with Martin Marietta, my concerns emulate all of these matters. At the last meeting I attended, a representative from Marin Marietta continuously asked us, "what do we want to see" as they kept showing us the so called development they are proposing. The one response I wanted to voice was, "how about we put our house up for sale, you buy it and you tell us what you would want to see in your back yard?" We have spent a great deal of money landscaping and developing our back yard that has an outstanding view of the mountains, amazing sunsets, a beautiful hay field and lake that just makes you want to sit outside and enjoy the tranquility that we are surrounded by. There are many areas available that are zoned specifically for Industrial purposes that can and should be used for those roles, the area in debate is zoned for Agricultural and should be preserved as such. Industrial pollution takes on many faces and all are a huge concern for all the residents and our families in this community. It has been proven that Industrial developments have contaminated many sources of drinking water, releases unwanted toxins into the air, reduces the quality of soil, creates unnecessary noise pollution, and unwanted light pollution that will occur due to prominent excess illumination of this area. In addition to the environmental issues, I am concerned that this development will increase the already heavy traffic on highway 34 and increase accident potential due to the continuous trains crossing this highway. Emergency vehicles will not be able to respond effectively to calls in the area if they are stopped in traffic due to trains crossing day and night. In closing, I hope that your office and the commissioners will take all the concerns submitted under serious consideration, understand the importance of the affects it will have on this community, and veto the proposal submitted by Martin Marietta. Thank you in advance for your time and considerations. Janet Larson Janet Larson 27575 Hopi Trail Johnstown, CO 80534 EXHIBIT (307)460-8774 Megan Kupec 184 East Vista Way North Salt Lake City, Utah 970-692-3839 Megan_kupec@msn.com July 19, 2015 Weld County Commissioner c/o Diana Aungst 1555 North 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 EXHIBIT Weld County Commissioners, I I have recently become privy to the embattlement between Martin Marietta's (TetraTech) and the concerned citizens of Weld County over this corporation's intention to rezone currently designated agricultural/residential land lying between highway 34 and county road 15 in Weld County Road 15 for heavy industry, to accommodate a concrete, asphalt, and trucking facility. I am deeply concerned to hear this news as it will create countless negative implications for the community and surrounding environment. I grew up at 27761 Hopi Trail located in Indian Head Estates in Johnstown, not 500 feet from where this industrial zone is being proposed. This is a peaceful and deeply invested community of hard working citizens that have deep-rooted ties in the betterment of weld county. I am saddened at the prospect of these individuals livelihoods and health being put in jeopardy in the name of economic advancement. Several epidemiological and environmental studies have been conducted and all outline numerous negative health and environmental implications these types of industries pose. Websites like the National Center for Biotechnology Information and OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) clearly outline the known hazards of concrete plants. The number one complaint of those who live in close proximity to concrete and asphalt plants is the dust that they generate. The NCBI website clearly outlines the adverse physiological effects of these Microparticles stating "Cement dust causes lung function impairment, chronic obstructive lung disease, restrictive lung disease, pneumoconiosis and carcinoma of the lungs, stomach and colon. Other studies have shown that cement dust may enter into the systemic circulation and thereby reach the essentially all the organs of body and affects the different tissues including heart, liver, spleen, bone, muscles and hairs and ultimately affecting their micro-structure and physiological performance." The OSHA website provides further clarification on the health hazards associated with these facilities and the dust created stating, "exposure to concrete dust can lead to silicosis and lung cancer". To mitigate the risk of exposure OSHA recommends that workers who are regularly around this dust wear P-, N- or R-95 respirators. I ask you, should the children in the abutting neighborhood be required to wear the same respirators to play outside? The OSHA website also discussed some of the many know carcinogens associated with cement and its production including hexavalent chromium, a known carcinogen which can infiltrate ground and drinking water supplies. The above are merely a few of the countless adverse health implications that this facility will place on the residents and environment in Weld County. However, adverse health implications are not the only side-effect of allowing a corporation such as Martin Marietta to build such facilities on this land. There are still more negative implications to consider, including but not limited to increased traffic volumes on already congested roadways (such as highway 34) and decreased property values for those in close proximity to this location. I have always admired and respected Weld County's positive attitude toward growth, but it should not and cannot come at the cost of its citizens and the environment. Please make the responsible and just decision in denying Martin Marietta their request to rezone this unique land. Best Regards, Megan Kupec [Your Name] ✓ itaa /39u1L77nJi2 [Street Address] 0230 f d2 y al £ RFCF !. \! FD [City, ST ZIP Code] Gn € Ct y' ea. 60' 650[Date] .�/3/s- 7 JUL 2 1 2015 £1471 : Weld County Planning Department GREELEY OFFICE Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, [Your Name] -‘17ndenernes) wel EXHIBIT ' sac [Your Name] g4N 4-) JP 1Z [Street Address] Y, O. [City, ST ZIP Code] #t. 7 co . & &f0 RECEIPVF. D [Date] 7/ 3/.i ��L : JUL 21 2015 Weld County Commissioners Weld County Planning Department GREELEY OFFICE c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project ( USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. 1 urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! (5761d46 Sincerely, [Your Name] EXHIBIT [Your Name] PILe_ thN2y [Street Address] /9 7 ,1) 3 /Pt RFCFVFD [City, ST Z I P Code] 64 t6 c ey cc ed es / JUL1 [Date] 773�/,� / L 21 2015 €i/47 L = Weld County Planning Department Weld County Commissioners GREELEY OFFICE c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N . 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project ( USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, [Your Name] — ‘).32/11 EXHIBIT David D. King 819 Quail Run RECEIVED Fort Collins, CO 80524 5/30/2015 JUL 212015 Weld County Planning Department GREELEY OFFICE Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana August (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Ave. Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I will benefit from this project as I work at Martin Marietta, t also feel that the Region will benefit from this project because it will make aggregate available for continued economic growth. This project has been well thought out, and limits the impact to traffic and the environment. It is companies that prepare for the future in a responsible manner that I want to be part of the region that I work and live in. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely David D. King EXHIBIT a Cto JUL- 15-2015 10 : 47 FROM : MARTIN & SONS EXCAUA 9706350413 TO : 4073902 P . 1 [Your Name] pmv t4e ,cre-t . [Street Address] 8 Sorg Cee z ? (City, ST ZIP Code] [Date] /I— ' •Clrd .41 / — Aeare RECEIVED weld County Commissioners JUL 21 2015 c/Q Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) County Planning Department Weld County Planning GREELEY OFFICE :1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am ono of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to Importing materials Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Darl /Lag— [Your Name) EXHIBIT a W9e,-, (0115 ,Vn nilwV3 AA 1o; cM Tr ate My name is Tim Hodsdon, and I live iw Denver . Most of my 18 years in Colorado have been spent in the small town of Fraser, I have worked in the architectural and planning profession. I've also served on the Fraser Planning Commission, where I learned how challenging it is to balance economic growth with maintaining a wonderful quality of life - all the reasons we like to live in a beautiful place like Weld County. I know you face the same challenges here. I understand that this plant & distribution center,=or-senwthiWlic �, k ost-likely necessary, and would be a welcome boon to Weld County for many reasons. From my perspective, the sole issue is the incompatibility of the site that's been proposed. It needs to be built, but it's clear that this isn't the place for it, from my perspective. I see some major drawbacks to this location: Proximity to residences: I'm sorry, but industrial uses and residential homes just don't mix, no matter what says. And this is a very high impact industrial use. kit Abbf A •-tit. pAESWWW {M ctfit I Meikq . week: Not only would neighbors be subjected to the impacts of thisplant during the week, but 6 days a gh � p half of the weekend as well. 1'M fie' NV- w &KO 'tea) tette, 400.0 a Odor: I'm sure you've driven by one of these facilities before. Sometimes I get to smell the local dog-food plant where I live. Not the most pleasant thing in the world. This would be significantly worse. Noise: This is not a r "I flat art of he world. The berms proposed won't shield neighbors from the impacts - visual or sound. 044 I (Atka ck � (Lk Ito tom, : 4' age"; , Ms' ' � nose tc etc. i fr . gica tie• \m# � nek Disruption of view: Our client has been planning a ranch/ wedding events center just east of thYs site, with construction to begin late this summer. She purchased her property with this in mind from the beginning. We have been working together on this project with one main focus: location. This site has the most magnificent views of the mountains, and is surrounded by idyllic ranch land. Although I'd love to think it was the architecture, the beauty of the site is the real reason guests would choose her facility. This project would destroy that. öbr ' do stinttowt, cotpaiviii Olt vitt t oar c CU tc5r ( k ' _ Decrease in property e Values: ' P . ere's a good chance thk ito 4-' people would most likely sell at a loss' &vat A S � a Impact on County Infrastructure: My experience has been that, no matter what pre-arrangements are 0 049.6 made during the planning process, the citizens and the municipalities typically end up bearing the brunt P YP Y 16.hg of infrastructural costs, in the long run. Shuts the Door to Tourism Dollars: Our client has been approved to create a tourist-based business next to this site. It simply wouldn't be possible if tlie Martin arietta plant w re next door.alerp i 6 current �ed uses surrounding the site. A The bottom line is, this plant is incompatible with the appro decision to allow a change of use for the Gerrard Investments property would have devastating effects on inhabitants and businesses right next door. I strongly recommend that you do not allow On behalf of my client, Chris Friede, and most of the neighbors, to deny this proposal - it just doesn't fi& . , s 4,403tj reroa t$MQ 4 AmtAttGle ca.4) oft) T-uw,4%,,tt 1 circa/104k, UV, EXHIBIT I 4a5_ iti01,40 ---� 501- Wit," I gam To: Weld County Commissioners do Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N . 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 970-353-6100 ext 3524; Fax: 970-304-6498 daungst@weidgov.com From: Dale A Horn Property Owner 1074 Poplar, Johnstown (Kelim) 80534 To: Case # USR 15-0027 I am strongly opposed to the Martin Marietta Materials (MMM) Highway 34 Development. A heavy industry plant of this nature is totally incompatible with the surrounding area of zoned residential, agricultural and light industry businesses. I bought my property in 1990. I chose it for the fresh air, serenity, and simple beauty a small acreage farm brings. I purposefully elected to live in this historically prime agricultural area with farms dating back to the 1850's. I am comfortable with the light industrial businesses that have filled in some of the surrounding area but the MMM project is an entirely unacceptable addition. The proposed MMM plant is essentially in my back yard . It will in fact destroy my current way of life with noise, hazardous dust particles, and toxic odors. The plant will disrupt the serenity of my sleep; deteriorate the quality of the air I breathe and pollute the water I drink. I enjoy the quietness of morning sunrises, the sounds of bird's first songs of the day, the early morning bray of my donkey. All that will be gone with a 24/7 heavy industrial plant nearby. Of particular concern is the impact this will have my livestock, some of which I raise and use for subsistence. I am concerned about the impact this plant will have on the ground water my livestock drink. Even if that doesn't happen overnight, the water will certainly be affected . I am also concerned about hazardous emissions and toxic fumes/odors associated with an asphalt plant. I am 87 years old . I have small great-grand children that are accustomed to feeding my livestock and riding the ponies. We will all be negatively affected by the daily, ongoing pollution of over 100,000 lbs/annually of associated asphalt dust particles and unpleasant/toxic odors. Another major concern involved access to/from my home. I can't imagine what it will be like to have an increased of more than 800 trucks daily on WCR 13, and I EXHIBIT 't Baia 5 already have a hard time accessing Highway 34. This increase also brings additional safety risks to me, my children and all the farmers, bikers, equestrians and pedestrians that use WCR 13. The increased noise level is also an issue. The hours of proposed operation , 24 hours/ 7 days a week and 365 days a year are unacceptable and intolerable. There will be an increase of noise from all aspects of the facility operations: backup alarms, heavy conveyor belt operations, idling trucks, heavy equipment operations, train operations, unloading and loading operations, etc. Add to that the increased noise of train traffic by Great Western and Union Pacific. Lastly, my property value is clearly at risk. It is estimated that the negative impact of this plant will likely decrease neighboring properties by 30-50%. I am relying on the value of my property to provide support should I need assisted living — a very real concern at my age, 87. Will Weld County reimburse me for the loss in value? There are other locations within Weld County (the Great Western Industrial Park in Windsor for example) which have all of the infrastructure needed - including all railroads-GW, UP and BNSF. As a 25 year resident and taxpayer in Weld County — I implore you, please vote no on this proposal , and encourage Martin Marietta to seek one of the other more compatible Weld County sites for their facility. Respectfully submitted , £ / a& /t Dale Horn Sarah Hunt 1103 S. Tyler Avenue Loveland, CO 80537 07/20/2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, Sarah Hunt EXHIBIT Wayne Saunders 7301 SW Frontage Road Ft. Collins 7/20/15 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N . 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, Wayne Saunders EXHIBIT David Densmore 9085 E. Mississippi Ave. Apt. M103 Denver, CO. 80247 07/20/15 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, David Densmore EXHIBIT Dennis Holman 5038 W 12th St Dr Greeley, CO 80634 7/20/2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N . 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027) . I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, Dennis Holman EXHIBIT Community of Kelim , Colorado July 17, 2015 To: Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 RE: Planning Application USR 15-0O27: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development Dear Weld County Commissioners, The Kelim neighborhood requests that you do not approve the above USR as it will have a substantially negative impact on our homes, families, businesses, safety, health and overall quality of life. The Martin Marietta application states that if their USR is approved, our access to Hwy 34 westbound will be mostly blocked due to their increased traffic. Our ability to safely use the Kelim frontage road is relevant to us as it is our main entrance to Hwy 34 heading west. Additionally there is evidence that the dust, odors and fumes generated from this large facility will negatively impact our health and wellbeing as our entire community is located close to the proposed facility. In the regrettable event that you do approve the USR, we request that you maintain our historic use of the frontage road and to ensure safe and timely access to highway 34 from CR 13. Sincerely, The Kelim Neighborhood The undersigned represent a portion of our community that live or work in Kelim: R= Resident E= Employee/Business Owner Name Signature / _ l 4me-Li A C-A'_✓L&A S rYVve\c , noLcv, (tjheoCav- WC 1 Hie) rid EXHIBIT 3 Community of Kelim , Colorado i - // `^ A, ,-) . . -7- '7 - A 1 /LAM \ Lditittel , i ,. I I ,, 11;r 1 ci le4ny . 41 . e, 1 -‘_ °----__ ____2 • H �_ - [ 8. s�fit , .. ..(- /-/ i f G. i • _/;fr id nn-i e if).r v, . ..,. _vi_vc -i-:::-»--0,62.e....... / A r/./fit. c . c.....e... ..t,_.7 ..t...._ r--ff ed.--A---•. ,t _ IT-. /V - e ta3 01-4;-14. ot, -)1/ it- /),96,/„o A -. j-,--/A.AAWG7. ri 4 R a,. a Gr 0 L .--- :-.” 4, 7...• , 4.07,..‘„„ /14cw gill/CA(6R F r f - • f .-- toffy -2 LA- r) I el s i Ntr J ._?4: ii rzedi � ' � f day , �,i !E �� lid l �j�}( c: L�5 '. / /�) :I II. / f/�_ ___ -------- jam , 4 i_ _111 Ica-- ; ( 10\ VAIA -QC"-i L1/4._ S si i ii.kfr\ ' "Ck Nje,‘,C,C)t Lk-. :1- .N,, FL.„ fr - C1A tiS r _: ‘-r . ;= 4_ fre._ _.� -- 1/2 E 4kr,e-tt4A 12 et/ .'4 t,, Si t, t C S i> E. ct9 c4C let• tku / _C6__ dir sielit5CrCr"Orrilir .6.- ;it (/' 11 „ co lc' ( C 5 / . i r-- r jotf, i ' /n/ k ;/--' /, . cam--- C, , . . 7�7/ 1 „ / , / / 7 ,/ _ i `/ 1 . , r 1-li ,t __ >�t al, E.r“ ..---- K. 5 1...-17— i• --- Respectful of your time, we have chosen to sign one letter rater than sending numerous form letters. Community of Kelim , Colorado Ly -� le.."::\E ir/ /7//4 _,n#__••J % . • J� a (• /' tre 9s5P1J tl1ovm r ( iscrS .E.• ,a, . ,<47--,- -,J v 9, 1 ,, i 46a eifierfotri A . lam ler e_ I fit✓` c?) g r vivi k ; v i k 1,-,, (1 rice ` C YLL,C)# 1 .31- -- 1 kLcc t-- k-SStt- ll `' ,% A 4 o- iILtA____,- I Respectful of your time, we have chosen to sign one letter rather than sending numerous form letters. From: Marcia Swanson July 20, 2015 8174 Field Circle Arvada, CO 80005 To: Weld County Commissioners C/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 North 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Re: Case #USR15-0027 FOR PUBLIC RECORD Dear Commissioners: The hopes, dreams, and safety of so many would be impacted by the Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development Plan. This land would be overtaken by basically an asphalt producing jungle with its noise, smell, obtrusive buildings, and safety issues. Great farmland that is important to the farmers and all of us would be affected. Also, this land is important to all the people and their families who have chosen to build or buy a home for themselves in order to live in a quiet, peaceful, and safe environment. Also, taken away, in many cases, would be pristine views of land, lakes, and the backdrop of our beautiful mountains! As with so many things in life, it comes down to what is right and fair versus what is wrong and unfair. Money and big business speak loudly and so many times it is the only criteria in making decisions of this type; and that is definitely wrong and unfair! All we have to do is look around and realize we live in an "Asphalt World" but please leave some of our beautiful land untouched by either the look of it or the producing of it ! Having a family member who lives in this area, I know how hard she has worked to obtain her land and a home on it that she loves dearly. Given the many reasons stated above, I strongly oppose the Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development Plan and ask that you not allow it to go through. EXHIBIT Sincerely, Marcia Swanson I __Silfts‘l- From: CLR-34 NA [mailto:clr34na@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 9:18 AM To: James Sham; David Hagerman Subject: Question list Mr. Sham, Mr. Hagerman, Attached is a list of questions about your proposed operation, some of which were asked on Tuesday, and some of which did not get addressed. This is a composite list from several members of the neighborhoods represented by CLR-34NA. (And, no, I did not write them all myself!) We would appreciate your complete responses as soon as possible, as well as the responses to the questions that I sent last week clarifying things that were said in the 6/2 meeting. In addition, we presume that the outcome of your Real Estate "analysis" is predetermined. Since the report is apparently delayed for several more weeks, we would like to know the specific methodology that your hired person is using for this. Some methods are more appropriate than others, and this would allow us to assess any potential value of this study. Dave Kisker President, CLR-34 Neighborhoods Assn. "Citizens Working for Responsible Development" EXHIBIT : stephen todrzak [mailto:steve todrzak@me.com] Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 8:02 PM To: Diana Aungst Subject: USR15-0027 Martin Marietta HWY 34 Project Steve Todrzak 184 East Vista Way FE) [*. , 4,T:�!' North Salt Lake City, UT 84054 1(562) 472-5611 Steve todnak@mc.com JUL 21 2015 July 19, 2015 vvelct County Hauttwiig uupai anent GREELEY OFFICE Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Greeley, CO 80631 Weld County Commissioners, I am writing you to express my sincere opposition with regards to Martin Marietta's Highway 34 project (USR15-0027). The land this company is attempting to have rezoned for heavy industrial use, located between Highway 34 and Weld County Road 13 is currently designated as agricultural/residential and should remain as such. I understand there are some who have expressed their support of this project, however, I feel it will only impose a plethora of negative consequences on our community that will far outweigh any potential benefits. I understand and admire Weld County's positive and accommodating attitude towards healthy and sustainable growth however, I believe Martin Marietta's project will only preclude the already rapid expansion our region is currently undergoing. With substantial retail and residential growth in the area, I am deeply concerned this type of industrial business will only hinder further expansion as it will bog down already congested roadways with large commercial vehicles, create unbearable noise and air pollution, and significantly impose on the area's natural beauty. This facility would also be built dangerously close to existing homes and neighborhoods, and I worry about the adverse health implications these individuals and their families may suffer. I urge you to consider the many negative implications Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project would impose on the citizens, the environment, as well as the healthy and sustainable growth of out region and ask that you adamantly deny this project. Sincerely, Stephen R. Todrzak EXHIBIT I ■ Catherine Kupec '1 (970) 213-3344 27761 Hopi Trail Johnstown, CO 80534 July19, 2015 PFC : i Weld County Commissioners JUL 21 2015 c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning ueetu County V''ian;;ire u ;)�iiiiie($L GREELEY OFFICE 1555 North 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Weld County Commissioners, I am writing to add my voice to the chorus of concerned residents and citizens of Weld County in regard to Martin Marrietta's recent attempt to rezone current agricultural/ residential land in order to accommodate heavy industry, to which I vehemently oppose. Martin Marietta (Tetra Tech) is trying to pass off their proposed building of a concrete/ asphalt/ trucking plant located off highway 34 and Weld County Road 13 as economically beneficial to our community. However, as a resident of Indian Head Estates for over 10 years, I have several concerns as to the benefits of such large industry only 500 feet from my home. If Martin Marietta is successful in their endeavor, the environmental implications of this facility alone would be disastrous. Creating water, air, and noise pollution that would undoubtedly impact the health of not only my family, but thousands of others who live near this location. The trucks and added trains to and from this facility would further contribute to the already congested roadways including highway 34. In addition, the building of this industrial facility will negatively impact the value of our home, which we have worked diligently to afford. It is my opinion that granting Martin Marietta this rezoning permit would be irresponsible and detrimental not only to our neighborhood, but to Weld county as a whole. I understand the necessity of this type of industry in today's day and age, but I do not think it should be at the expense of the health and well-being of the residents of the community. As a resident of this great community for nearly 25 years, I want nothing more than to see it flourish and thrive, but this is NOT the way. Please hear our pleas to deny Martin Marietta (TetraTech) this rezoning grant. I have faith in our county and look forward to your decision to deny this request. Best Regards, EXHIBIT Catherine E. Kupec To : Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP , CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N . 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 970-353-6100 ext 3524 ; Fax: 970-304-6498 . , '° ' . ' y daungst@weldgov .com JUL 21 2015 From : Alan Lee Horn Resident weIu LouFity � '�a�� i�. G ►�� GREELEY OFFICE 1074 Poplar, Johnstown (Kelim) 80534 To: Case # USR 15-0027 I am strongly opposed to the Martin Marietta Materials (MMM) Highway 34 Development. The primary concern I have is that a heavy industry plant of this nature is incompatible with the surrounding area zoned for residential , agricultural and light industry businesses. My secondary concern is in regard to the PM (Particulate Matter) that will be emitted from the MMM plant. According to the formal report by the World Health Organization in January, 2003, the following is cited : Question: Which effects can be expected of long-term exposure to levels of PM (Particulate Matter) observed currently in Europe (include both clinical and pre-clinical effects, e.g . development of respiratory system)? Answer: Long-term exposure to current ambient PM concentrations may lead to a marked reduction in life expectancy. The reduction in life expectancy is primarily due to increased cardio-pulmonary and lung cancer mortality. Increases are likely in lower respiratory symptoms and reduced lung function in children , and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and reduced lung function in adults. Source: Health Aspects of Air Pollution with Particulate Matter, Ozone and Nitrogen Dioxide Report on a World Health Organization Working Group. Bonn, Germany 13- 15 January 2003 Thank you for your consideration . Respectfully, Alan Lee Horn EXHIBIT 450 Resident From : Patty Mills <thymetoveg@gmail . com< mailto : thvmetovegPgmail . com >> Case # USR 15 - 0027 For Public Record July 19 , 2015 7.64 rrif: nfrasn Weld County Commissioners ' c/o Diana Aungst , AICP , CFM Planner II 5 Weld County Department of Planning Services JUL 2 1 �0�3 1555 N . 17th Avenue vvelu LoLday ,;, Greeley , Colorado 80631 GREELEY OrFICE 970 - 353 - 6100 ext 3524; Fax : 970- 304- 6498 daungst@weldgov . com Weld County Commissioners : RE : Planning Applications USR 15 - 0027 : Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development I am writing as a concerned citizen regarding the proposed Martin Marietta site . My son and his wife live just 100 feet from the edge of the proposed plant would be constructed . I am asking you to please DENY this application for numerous reasons . How exactly does Martin Marietta plan on keeping curious children from hopping over or crawling through a measley barbed wire fence they plan on using as a perimeter barrier ? These nearby families ( and they are many ) shouldn ' t have to worry constantly about their children ' s whereabouts , or pets for that matter . What ' s the " good neighbor " going to do if a small child sneaks in and is accidently run over by a front - end loader ? Martin Marietta is bulldogging their way into this property because , simply stated , it fits every one of THEIR needs , and that ' s all that matters to them . They say they want to be " good neighbors " but that ' s what every one of these big companies says in this type of situation . If they were truly honest in this " good neighbor " plause , they would have packed up and shipped out to the next best location on their list once they saw how many neighbors and concerned citizens expressed their dismay at the entire idea . I visit my kids often and love their quaint little farmhouse with the beautiful views in all directions . especially love sitting with them at sunset and watching the dramatic colors light up the sky to the west . The residents of this whole area , not just Indianhead Estates but several county roads in all directions are dotted with the homes of hard working Weld County people , and NONE of them want this disgusting plant anywhere near them . Would you ? I sure wouldn ' t . My son was raised on a 1500 acre farm with his two brothers , we still farm it to this day . Every summer he plants and maintains a massive 1/ 2 acre organic garden behind their barn . They grow all kinds of vegetables , mostly old fashioned heirlooms to kee . EXHIBIT ____B3n it original to the 120 year old farm . This summer they will be selling at the Greeley Farmer ' s Market . He tells me that Martin Marietta states in their application that this land is not viable for crops ? ! My chin hit the floor . Just the other night we were disgussing how beautiful the alfalfa has done this year . There have been soy beans thriving , and wheat , now hay . NOT pasture grasses like stated in the application . How can an applicant blatantly lie about such a thing ? This land is all PRIME farmland of NATIONAL importance ! What happened to Weld County ' s big " right to farm" saying ? Please don ' t let this high dollar corporation pull the wool over your eyes . Their application is riddled with false information and misleading "facts " . I also want to express my concern about my son ' s wife, the stress of this whole situation is making her question wanting to start a family as soon as they ' d originally planned . If this proposal is approved they will no longer feel safe living here , especially with a new baby . And I would have to agree , I wouldn ' t want my grand children inhaling toxic chemicals and cement dust while playing in the yard . Please consider all of these facts when considering this proposal , and PLEASE DENY it . This is in no one ' s best interest but Martin Marietta and they have plenty of money to find another site that isn ' t going to ruin the lives of so many wonderful families , families who were here FIRST and farmers who have THE RIGHT TO FARM . Once something like this is approved in this area it will open the floodgates to the same types of companies to bully their way in as well . Who is going to want to build nice new homes around that ? Who wants to have a big industrial area right behind the "Weld County Is a Right to Farm County" sign right at the most important gateway to Weld County ? Let alone the traffic hazards this whole situation will cause . Highway 34 can ' t handle tha increase in cars , let alone trucks 3x the size . Who ' s going to pay for the widening of highway 34 ? who ' s going to pay for the traffic light at CR 13 ? Unless that answer is Martin Marietta , and that they ' ll have it done by the time the plant is operating ( impossibility ) , I think they ' re expecting the tax payers to fund it . That seems fair , doesn ' t it . . . . Please stand up for these residents and protect their quality of life , I implore you . My son and his wife are now witnessing and being a part of a great civic experience with this whole situation . It would be such a travesty if Martin Marietta would be able to march in here and do such an injustice to all of these wolderful folks . Thank you for your time and consideration , Patty Mills From : Amanda Hutchinson [ SMTP : AMANDARAE . HUTCHINS0N@GMAIL . 00M] Sent : Tuesday , July 21 , 2015 4 : 08 : 34 AM To : Diana Aungst Subject : usr 15 -0027 Concerned Citizen Letter Auto forwarded by a Rule Case # USR 15 - 0027 For Public Record JUL 21 2Q15 July 19 , 2015 V\ Li;l Loanly GREELEY OFFICE Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst , AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N . 17th Avenue Greeley , Colorado 80631 970- 353 - 6100 ext 3524; Fax : 970- 304- 6498 daungstOweldgov . com Weld County Commissioners : RE : Planning Applications USR 15 - 0027 : Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development I am writing in regards to the proposed asphalt/ concrete plant by Martin Marietta . My husband and I live directly south of where this plant is proposed to be built . We have been following all of the information provided by Martin Marietta as well as the community and hired experts . It has become apparent that Martin Marietta has only one objective and that is NOT hearing the concerns of neighbors , but in running over anyone in their way to complete this plant as quickly as possible . I have read all of the provided information , application , rebuttals , referrals , etc , and after reading the application itself I am VERY concerned at the amount of misinformation , misleading lines regarding very important aspects of this plan . Any literate person with half a brain could easily point out all of the questionable flaws buried in the proposed application ! The fact of the matter is , there are no mitigation efforts that could be set into place that would do a sufficient job in controlling odors , dust pollution , exhaust pollution from the many trucks up and down the road and through the facility , chemical pollution from the batch plant ( if it really is a batch plant , sounds more like a continuous plant to me ) . This site is on a sloping grade to the south , meaning, a sloping grade straight toward our house and garden . The water table here is VERY high , My husband dug a hole to plant a tree a few weeks ago and we hit water at 3 ft ! So how on earth can Martin Marietta guarantee that our well water, or that of our neighbors , or the water we use to irrigate our large organic market garden won ' t be contaminated by the run off from their plant ? They can ' t ! Unless EXHIBIT they plan on pouring in a facility wide tub to set the whole place in . Do you see that happening ? I Don ' t . . It will leak down the hill to our property , to Bill Boegli ' s property and straight into the Koenig resevoir where the fish and waterfoul get to play in it . I ' m not going to cover all the same points that everyone else has already so eloquently presented to you in their letters . I do hope you take each of the formal Martin Marietta form letters in support of this plan with a grain of salt . I visited the MM website pertaining to this proposal and they have cleverly devised a link where anyone from anywhere can submit their own pre - drafted email in support and have it emailed directly to your office . I wonder how many of those folks will be smelling the asphalt as it ' s being processed daily? How many of those supporters live in the area . . . even 20 miles from this disgusting plant ? How many of them will have to spray off their beautiful flowers and gardens to wash off the cement dust every evening ? How many will have to hear roaring trains with wheels squealing and locking all day long ( and night ) ? How many of these daily commuters on highway 34 would really support this idea if they knew this was going on ? Not many I ' d bet . Please deny this application and let ' s send the message that Weld County is a " Right to Farm" county and will always be . There are places for farms and places for big dirty industrial asphalt plants . This is a place to keep agricultural . Thank you , Amanda Mills ps please let me know youve received this , Ive tried emailing this 3 times now 'm r n v r . From : Scott Tarbell [ SMTP : STARBELL777@GMAIL. COM] Sent : Monday , July 20 , 2015 10 : 06 : 53 PM JUL 21 201e To : Diana Aungst Subject : Indianhead Subdivision/ Martin Marrietta rticlu UJuI ty r ;u uiilaig Auto forwarded by a Rule GREELEY OFFICE Dear Sirs , I am writing to express my grave concern and discontent regarding the asphalt plant that is being proposed on the southeast corner of Hwy34 and CR13 . As a longterm homeowner in the Indianhead subdivision I believe that something such as the proposed asphalt plant would do many negative things to the surrounding area . 1 . It would create a great increase in traffic issues on both Hwy34 and CR13 , which would be detrimental in many ways . 2 . It would create ; air pollution , noise pollution , and other environmental issues . 3 . It will decrease the value of the homes that have been here and long previously established . 4 . It will be an absolute eyesore, from both the subdivision and from the passing traffic on Hwy34, which in turn poorly represents our area for the reason people are in and come to Colorado . Affecting our everyday life , tourism , and longterm wellbeing . Martin Marietta would be the one single benefactor at the expense of an incredible amount of surrounding permanent residents and visitors to this area . This is not an industrial area , this is a place of high profile from Loveland to Greeley that thousands of people drive by every single day . It represents the beauty of Colorado and why this state is great . I HIGHLY OPPOSE the mere thought of bringing the asphalt plant to this area . Please do not let something such as this happen , as we are not talking about something that can be undone if is found a bad idea later . We are talking about something that would be carved in stone and affect and be at the expense of an incredible amount of people , while there is only one single potentially positive recipient . , which by the way is a massive corporation that has no true interest or love for this area . Thankyou for your consideration . Sincerely , Scott Tarbell EXHIBIT Emily Anderson Elder Medical Doctor 525 14th Street —Windsor, CO 80550 970.372.8381 -hemily27(iDyahoo.com77Cril \f yr . . , , JUL 21. 2015 July 21 . 2015 Vvelu (;aunty t=1un,w ig Le .;ilillelli GREELEY OFFICE SENT VIA US MAIL AND EMAIL TO: daungst@weldgov.eom Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner I Weld County Department of Planning Services I 555 North 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development Dear Ms. Aungst: This letter is my formal objection to the proposed Martin Marietta Materials (MMM) development south of Highway 34 and east of Vs/CR 13 in Weld County (the "Proposed Development"). I strongly oppose the Proposed Development due to the negative impacts it will have on the individuals who live, work and travel through this area. As a member of the Northern Colorado community, I frequently travel along the Highway 34 corridor, one that is already congested. The Proposed Development would bring yet more traffic to this area when there are no sufficient funds for road widening or safety. Secondly, while the Proposed Development may aid the rapid growth of Northern Colorado, it does not support Weld County's overall vision: a vision of providing a peaceful and safe home for growing families as well as agriculture. Thirdly and most importantly in my mind are the unknown health risks associated with the Proposed Development. While current studies show minimal health risks associated with asphalt plant emissions, the true effect of chronic low level exposure to hazardous pollutants is actually unknown and could potentially be carcinogenic. In the short term, the pollutants (even at low levels) can irritate the upper respiratory tract especially for those residents already suffering from asthma, allergies, chronic obstruction pulmonary disease, etc. As a current Family Medicine Physician in Windsor. I already see a variety of health problems related to Northern Colorado's growing pollution. An asphalt plant may be needed in Northern Colorado for future infrastructure but not at the cost of our residents' health, especially when Weld County houses other potential rural plant sites. EXHIBIT My parents currently reside in the Indian Head Estates subdivision adjacent to the Proposed Development Site. They both strive to maintain a healthy lifestyle by growing their own produce, walking outside daily, and getting adequate sleep without noise or disruptions. This seems to be the theme for many of the Indian Head Estates residents as I often see them doing the same. However, allowing this Proposed Development could counteract their healthy lifestyle. I encourage the members of the Commission to walk in my parents' and these residents' shoes for a moment: would you want to work your entire life to maintain health to potentially have it negated by someone else's proposed business development? We can't prove the Proposed Development would cause this impediment, but we also can't verify that it won't. Would you want to gamble your health with those odds? 1 would sincerely appreciate if you could please acknowledge, by return email, that you have received this letter and that it has been incorporated into the Public Record and the respective packets for the Board of County Commissioners. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, / tL 624LL [ ( vU4/ ( ( L/\ Emily R. Anderson Elder, M.D. From : Alisha Miell [SMTP : CLADS280@HOTMAIL . COM ] Sent : Monday , July 20 , 2015 9 : 44 : 20 PM To : Diana Aungst Subject : Case # USR 15 - 0027 Auto forwarded by a Rule Case # USR 15 - 0027 P r For Public Record - 4 Weld County Commissioners JUL 21 2015 c/o Diana Aungst , AICP , CFM Planner II la Weld County Department of Planning Services vveid Camay i- rirtF � �;pdrui�eut 1555 N . 17th Avenue GREELEY OFFICE Greeley , Colorado 80631 970 - 353 - 6100 ext 3524; Fax : 970- 304 - 6498 daungstPweldgov . com July 20 , 2015 I have family who lives just 200 ft from the proposed asphalt site and it would not only be hazardous to their health but ruin their quality of life altogether . Being from a family and community of farmers , to take agricultural land , that is producing and providing either produce for consumers or hay/wheat/ corn for livestock will make a huge impact on your economy . I am not sure what kind of benefits taking homes and agricultural land away from families and farmers will bring your county but I really hope everyone takes a look at just what kind of impact this will make . This all being said , I cannot imagine the types of chemicals that will be released from the making of asphalt , not just in the air but water and soil as well . Hundreds of citizens can and will be affected by this as well as livestock and wildlife . Sincerely , Alisha Miell EXHIBIT Personal Statement To : Weld County Planning Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst A/we -4- Lec3 LV\ ��I , �� wish to go on the record to express my strong opposition to the Martin Marietta Materials " Highway 34 Project" which will be considered at the Planning Commission hearing on July 21, 2015 . While I wish to attend the hearing and express my concerns in person , I will not be able to do so because : L,Otd scIA-e-cU-S& creS ettrCe. S)2'AreAPre.L1 (s*C1S W YV\ l'A--12-‘14— 4./4— je--T V Please accept my apology for my absence and recommend DENIAL of the project application on my behalf. Signature : 6C ase-1 Date : 1 1 7 I S Address : l to cal' ace' nv-c- Gric ) Co to &S `f EXHIBIT D Personal Statement To: Weld County Planning Commissioners cio Diana Aungst I Ple Lynn N ; s' wish to go on the record ijo express my strong opposition to the Martin Marietta Materials "Highway 34 Project" which will be considered at the Planning Commission hearing on July 21, 2015. While I wish to attend the hearing and express my concerns in person, l will not be able to do so because : O A ef3/40/AGni fvu 41&t wiNA 44rci (eatand ma in (kAQQ ,2 f ti--c J4 1 k . . ewirie 1 yr in /n,I ,n hll ci tittac, Wt14 and ,th r erDita,4- ( s 4Qh dw2a-id ' O Sori r 6 ,/44-) . Please accept my apology for my absence and recommend DENIAL of the project application on my behalf. Signature: Date : 4M0/2a hS Address: g1Q9 (,J;AJ 11,-e ot.bof. CA) soSTO EXHIBIT I Personal Statement To : Weld County Planning Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst 1, all rr-edirid Niies wish to go on the record to express my strong opposition to the Martin Marietta Materials "Highway 34 Project" which will be considered at the Planning Commission hearing on July 21, 2015. While I wish to attend the hearing and express my concerns in person, I will not be able to do so because : art, # -- I- rL lb frzprisibilibteac . 1]m profds payonlivmy in -laws hoot, ii .Driorkelif S fair s elf . ( ' - . itt l. Please accept my apology for my absence and recommend DENIAL of the project application on my behalf. Signature: Date: -7712-0/ / S Address : �� 1 e1p( bil: Wirldigri (1) /0 I EXHIBIT N I Personal Statement To: Weld County Planning Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst I, (c\\tw\ wish to go on the record to express my s rong opposition to the Martin Marietta Materials "Highway 34 Project" which will be considered at the Planning Commission hearing on July 21, 2015 . While I wish to attend the hearing and express my concerns in person, I will not be able to do so because: O a ?it( ce mm'\toty1 tilt the lyrist o G tfr firrhiri Please accept my apology for my absence and recommend DENIAL of the project application on my behalf. Signature: '1O ll , `J1 U Date: 2 _ ICS Address: t `\fkeftnor15 wi TX- t J3fx5 , re zoo ?) EXHIBIT Personal Statement To : Weld County Planning Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst I � 1 . 6s,4- 1 Ck wish to go on the record to express my strong oppositi n to the Martin Marietta Materials "Highway 34 Project" which will be considered at the Planning Commission hearing on July 21, 2015 . While I wish to attend the hearing and express my concerns in person, I will not be able to do so because : t g k.j 4 Please accept my apology for my absence and recommend DENIAL of the project application on my behalf. Signature : kJ�-��- Date : h s` Address : ic c t l,� ► (, vt�5ar . �o �js� U EXHIBIT Personal Statement To : Weld County Planning Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst I, _ _ 4,161, _ 6 / Lc: wish to go on the record to express my strong opposition to the Martin Marietta Materials "Highway 34 Project" which will be considered at the Planning Commission hearing on July 21, 2015 . While I wish to attend the hearing and express my concerns in person , I will not be able to do so because : Please accept my apology for my absence and recommend DENIAL of the project application on ehaif. 4 ,2 _ 2/-- / C Signature : ate : Address: (SL /5 ��:�C - I Y6 ,3 ( EXHIBIT I 9149 . • Personal Statement To : Weld County Planning Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst Obre (, wish to o on the g record to exp ess my strong opposition to the Martin Marietta Materials " Highway 34 Project" which will be considered at the Planning Commission hearing on July 21, 2015 , While I wish to attend the hearing and express my concerns in person , I will not be able to do so because : -1 ie a cjyv L Please accept my apology for my absence and recommend DENIAL of the project application on my behalf. ,r+ Signature : Date : " )--e l Address : /O195 dila On_ r,�I�ti 5?ei 53 q L/ EXHIBIT Personal Statement To : Weld County Planning Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst I , A rad --- wish to go on the record to express my strong opposition to the Martin Marietta Materials "Highway 34 Project" which will be considered at the Planning Commission hearing on July 21, 2015 . While I wish to attend the hearing and express my concerns in person , I will not be able to do so because : r CJ1Heyel-Alt (40Lectre__ Please accept my apology for my absence and recommend DENIAL of the project application on my behalf. Signature : Date : 7/it 5 Address : . I Yo S5 EXHIBIT D 19 Personal Statement To : Weld County Planning Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst I, aialia-Jk 4< - wish to go on the record to express my strong opposition to the Martin Marietta Materials " Highway 34 Project" which will be considered at the Planning Commission hearing on July 21, 2015 . While I wish to attend the hearing and express my concerns in person, I will not be able to do so because : Locrse-- &kJ. -?c,.A.31.k., °LANA aavy liAra t4C) 2e* dTh - Please accept my apology for my absence and recommend DENIAL of the project application on my behalf. Signature : �c C—A — Date : • adaal � Address : &:??CocSCikdonct5xL„--If. e ?cs1wx1own ,CO . 2053Y EXHIBIT Personal Statement To : Weld County Planning Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst I, 'ijtcy, i _, ,1 c ,4-,__, �, _t , wish to go on the record to express my strong opposition to the Martin Marietta Materials "Highway 34 Project" which will be considered at the Planning Commission hearing on July 21, 2015 . While I wish to attend the hearing and express my concerns in person, I will not be able to do so because : l r jet .. / t t � . .. et gi ik c ok t-4 7 ' ( S Please accept my apology for my absence and recommend DENIAL of the project application on my behalf. Signature : t4Jh!yi ' _ Date : Address: ket S ti / /1- G, In 7 c v EXHIBIT Personal Statement To : Weld County Planning Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst I - 004V10-1.1be---cwish to go on the record to express my strong opposition to the Martin Marietta Materials " Highway 34 Project" which will be considered at the Planning Commission hearing on July 21, 2015 . While I wish to attend the hearing and express my concerns in person, I will not be able to do so because : Lite!, 0 o , iv" ka) ate ci cA,Leth 0A k- � ; Please accept my apology for my absence and recommend DENIAL of the project application on my behalf. Signature >ktothlizik LJQ/ndLoitt Date : I Address : c9 7 3 3 3 c . c-o 5-,9/ EXHIBIT Personal Statement To: Weld County Planning Commission c/o Diana Aungst I, Johnny R. McCoy, wish to go on record to express my strong opposition to the Martin Marietta materials " Highway 34 Project" which will be considered at the Planning Commission Hearing on July 21, 2015. While I wish to attend the hearing and express my concerns in person, I will not be able to do so because my wife is still in the hospital. She is scheduled to be released the day of the hearing. Upon her return home we will be meeting with home health care for training on how to administer the required medications, to include intravenous application, and how to care for my wife at home. Please accept my apology for my absence and recommended DENIAL of the project application on by behalf. Signature: 7 J Date: July 20, 2015 Address: 26360 Weld County Road 15 Johnstown, Colorado 80534 EXHIBIT Agin_ Diana Aungst Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Ms. Aungst: I am deeply opposed to USR15-0027, the proposed Martin Marietta plant to be built near my home. However, I'm not able to attend the Planning Commission Hearing on July 21, 2015 For the following reason: k cfc-- cc- Ne C,JOi L..) ( be Pu\-6)\A' 3 Please allow a speaker who is also opposed to this project to use my 3 minutes of allotted time for his/her presentation. Signature I -COO Printed Name • 627ct Cenneteirtit CA-e Address Johnstown, CO 80534 July 17- ,2015 EXHIBIT Cf4t5q___ iv Diana Aungst Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Ms. Aungst: I am deeply o osed to USR15-0027, the proposed Martin Marietta plant to be built near my home. However, I'm not able to attend the Planning Commission Hearing on July 21, 2015 For the following reason : .-LhINC -e c / Cr- e Y- 24O ? (o (,) t D C c) C/ f s ♦ b n • >> ireJ A 5Idety, � Please allow a speaker who is also opposed to this project to use my 3 minutes of allotted time for his/her presentation . 7 Signature Cr c reirtt K �" c► L -f s% L. Printed Name 22 / 3 rinx' Address Johnstown, CO 80534 July ,2015 EXHIBIT q55 Diana Aungst Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley,.CO 80631 Dear Ms. Aungst: I am deeply opposed to USR15-0027, the proposed Martin Marietta plant to be built near my home. However, I'm not able to attend the Planning Commission Hearing on July 21, 2015 For the following reason: \\SC) ('�-�K , n Please allow a speaker who is also opposed to this project to use my 3 minutes of allotted time for his/her presentation. zr ki.A4 Signature ACI ` ) O (4 r I V" Printed Name Z- 1I -7I Hoe ► 1 r Address Johnstown, CO 80534 July ,2015 EXHIBIT Personal Statement To : Weld County Planning Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst I, ilia217)LtZil wish to go on the record to express my strong opposition to the Martin Marietta Materials " Highway 34 Project" which will be considered at the Planning Commission hearing on July 21, 2015 . While I wish to attend the hearing and express my concerns in person, I will not be able to do so because : mere- 0J & 7Li) yethes 4 &1nGc" Please accept my apology for my absence and recommend DENIAL of the project application on my behalf./211 Signature : &4tt dWA Date : Address: 66-, 60 (4l4#Zet.„ � EXHIBIT Personal Statement To: Weld County Planning Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst 1 , Lt v1/4_A\ wish to go on the record to express my strong opposition to the Martin Marietta Materials "Highway 34 Project" which will be considered at the Planning Commission hearing on July 21 , 2015 . While I wish to attend the hearing and express my concerns in person, I will not be able to do so because : E \ ; ) ‘ 1/4 . 1 , 1 ! e1 ,1 Please accept my apology for my absence and recommend DENIAL of the project application on my behalf. '4 Signature: is L\ � ► L tA Date: _1 I ' _i 15 Address: 1t t o o g ^ i i , r\ t. ? 5 U , 1 t K ) v1 \iy> ( \ EXHIBIT D D Personal Statement To : Weld County Planning Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst I , if3 C N`" 1 .1-5 A ,11/4_ n wish to go on the record to express my strong opposition to the Martin Marietta Materials "Highway 34 Project" which will be considered at the Planning Commission hearing on July 21, 2015 . While I wish to attend the hearing and express my concerns in person, I will not be able to do so because : Please accept my apology for my absence and recommend DENIAL of the project application on my behalf. Signature: * * , -�,- - Date : Address : Li ci i c 1 ; u r1 1- ) K ut, l" u 1/4e\ 1 ) -tULKJ n , C ll EXHIBIT Personal Statement To : Weld County Planning Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst r-, ! , ' AI ' , `. '_ c �' ' N � wish to go on the record to express my strong opposition to the Martin Marietta Materials "Highway 34 Project" which will be considered at the Planning Commission hearing on July 21, 2015 . While I wish to attend the hearing and express my concerns in person, I will not be able to do so because : T - 1 - - ‘ 1 ' r 1. 11 i`iu1L 7 l --- • IN 61 / / - pc ' . N\k- Th t \-)uct- a _ -5-ki_ -roc ) t_.\ ( \ipi , :x_ • 1 \\ w t (4 - At •\- ( \ \-- Please accept my apology for my absence and recommend DENIAL of the project application on my behalf. ) , ) , i Signature: JE? 1 L //!( .),. t '11 c.U , Date : ' . --- 1 _\ d --:— — —) / Address: 5 ( it_ ily-\ '')-7-q- k-- \ I \ EXHIBIT Personal Statement To : Weld County Planning Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst I , - ", ( c k i t = ti f , wish to go on the record to express my strong opposition to the Martin Marietta Materials "Highway 34 Project" which will be considered at the Planning Commission hearing on July 21, 2015 . While I wish to attend the hearing and express my concerns in person, I will not be able to do so because : iY Cel )( ltA A d 11 - t Y V c ,( C � . K 1 1 \ 1\\ < l-/ ' . sr"`_y- O k\ r I 1 C / ( ( 1 kC. C ` t re- c_ -` r ) f~( 4 6C_ ( ' Y c- L \ 3L ( ), • ,�- r Please accept my apology for my absence and recommend DENIAL of the project application on my behalf. Signature : zed, > . C �� "' _ N7 Date : , /e/1k � � 1 \J , Address: < < ) (1( _:-z)- c( r()' EXHIBIT Personal Statement To : Weld County Planning Commissioners coo Diana Aungst I , Y---\12)- \ Kik \ ~, '1 � _ ( � i wish to go on the record to express my strong opposition to the Martin Marietta Materials "Highway 34 Project" which will be considered at the Planning Commission hearing on July 21, 2015 . While I wish to attend the hearing and express my concerns in person, I will not be able to do so because : to CK L \ 1 \. .'� A l c' ‘,/ (Ow( ,, l r 11 Please accept my apology for my absence and recommend DENIAL of the project application on my behalf. ?,i1„).1.11 Signature: . a rat K\�� 4 Date : f �; ) e ft/ Address: r�,,`�� .. . .[ 'hilt Lk ; . L_ 'J `3 EXHIBIT Personal Statement To : Weld County Planning Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst I , Ot 6,\ �: ► c. sA \+ .i\-\ wish to go on the record to express my strong opposition to the Martin Marietta Materials " Highway 34 Project" which will be considered at the Planning Commission hearing on July 21, 2015 . While I wish to attend the hearing and express my concerns in person , I will not be able to do so because : (A3„\6- D \ Please accept my apology for my absence and recommend DENIAL of the project application on m b al Signature : ) - Date : / 1 ( , rp Address : giC911) \ncNti\efr--4-: \r C 4-. .\-k\r- q635/ } EXHIBIT Personal Statement To : Weld County Planning Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst )41 \ I c( I 1 .,/r wish to go on the record to express my strong opposition to the Martin Marietta Materials "Highway 34 Project" which will be considered at the Planning Commission hearing on July 21, 2015 . While I wish to attend the hearing and express my concerns in person, I will not be able to do so because : 1 S. NO )1: ( 'IA 11 I e+t-3 11L-O Cie+ —)1 ) ( C l ) \ _L 41 , I , ,�-�\ �'1�� c C �' fl S ( U V (CRC, * --�n , ec o, _ - c - d 1 ' 91C b 6 -a-C1\ :? ) Pett-/ c I( Please accept my apology for my absence and recommend DENIAL of the project application on my behalf. Signature: ( � t_}_��, r . {� i X� Date : H ; r � � 1 Address: � `l('^ C7Lc' C ")/ 1 EXHIBIT go9 Personal Statement To : Weld County Planning Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst I, ( ' /1 i E4 wish to go on the 7/ record to express my strong opposition to the Martin Marietta Materials "Highway 34 Project" which will be considered at the Planning Commission hearing on July 21, 2015. While I wish to attend the hearing and express my concerns in person, I will not be able to do so because : EO -II * r -As, Please accept my apology for my absence and recommend DENIAL of the project application on my behalf. Signature : en LP/1)(t_ado_ ,�z� Date : 7 L' - / Address: 44, 9 y aip r LtL � l o EXHIBIT i Personal Statement To : Weld County Planning Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst I , g} ; .9 �%_ c - ca wish to go on the record to express my strong opposition to the Martin Marietta Materials "Highway 34 Project" which will be considered at the Planning Commission hearing on July 21, 2015 . While I wish to attend the hearing and express my concerns in person, I will not be able to do so because : C4/ 70r /dam .. Please accept my apology for my absence and recommend DENIAL of the project application on my behalf. Signature : .� .. Date : 7 � ?o `' /5 V Address. �o_ i ,lam dd EXHIBIT Personal Statement To : Weld County Planning Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst ok . wish to go on the record to express my strong opposition to the Martin Marietta Materials "Highway 34 Project" which will be considered at the Planning Commission hearing on July 21, 2015 . While I wish to attend the hearing and express my concerns in person, I will not be able to do so because : LLcif Please accept my apology for my absence and recommend DENIAL of the project application on my behalf. Signature : Date: 7- (re- / 5 Address: 7L /._\\ roo ctv \ J. Or SJ Az-) LA Cs:* c y N H ep` 1 � a`� (`S EXHIBIT Personal Statement To : Weld County Planning Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (-) `- fitZ PuzjojW wish to go on the record to expresg my strong opposition to the Martin Marietta Materials "Highway 34 Project" which will be considered at the Planning Commission hearing on July 21, 2015. While I wish to attend the hearing and express my concerns in person, I will not be able to do so because : (311 ( Please accept my apology for my absence and recorrriend DENIAL of the. project application on my behalf. Signature : Date : r Address: ' DiEd . EXHIBIT 1 Personal Statement To : Weld County Planning Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst I , tcrr Y-- L 9C c wish to go on the record to express my strong opposition to the Martin Marietta Materials "Highway 34 Project" which will be considered at the Planning Commission hearing on July 21, 2015 . While I wish to attend the hearing and express my concerns in person, I will not be able to do so because : 7/7e.2_4...) )4.d":7- lam L.. I lr Y r G✓ r_? Please accept my apology for my absence and recom nd DENIAL o the project application on my behalf. Signature : Date : 7 Zv 2ci5 Address: EXHIBIT Personal Statement To : Weld County Planning Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst 1 , Wirk /),) wish to go on the �1 record to express my strong opposition to the Martin Marietta Materials "Highway 34 Project" which will be considered at the Planning Commission hearing on July 21, 2015 . While I wish to attend the hearing and express my concerns in person, I will not be able to do so because : l�y /Ce40 atrieaa Mba rd" Please accept my apology for my absence and recommend DENIAL of the project application on my behalf. Signature : 4AAt, Date : 749//,.. Address: 91Za /0,A; EXHIBIT Personal Statement To : Weld County Planning Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst I, I 1'YlS wish to go on the record to express my strong opposition to the Martin Marietta Materials "Highway 34 Project" which will be considered at the Planning Commission hearing on July 21, 2015. While I wish to attend the hearing and express my concerns in person, I will not be able to do so because : 6, La c-14 c" cavvc\A-:: if FL Aciuktet M -1--€AAAtt Le- tbevt, ozottik0 0 t “u1/4 Please accept my apology for my absence and recommend DENIAL of the project application on my behalf. Signature : - Cirit-Jallae2 Date: 4/a1/201 r Address: X 7 7 / 1 ski-Lett JciL-4.,. 1, c:.. Sk 4c> • EXHIBIT Personal Statement To: Weld County Planning Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst i , c-; ,T LccJ wish to go on the record to express my strong opposition to the Martin Marietta Materials "Highway 34 Project" which will be considered at the Planning Commission hearing on July 21, 2015 . While I wish to attend the hearing and express my concerns in person, I will not be able to do so because : Please accept my apology for my absence and recommend DENIAL of the project application on my behalf. Signature: 1 Date: 0 7/ 17 /1O 15 Address: 6 % Z-o c l L 4 ._) k 1 1 v` CO .r13 a S orcw keJ es tc tCs EXHIBIT D Personal Statement To : Weld County Planning Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst KDau. ► e ) ( tao wish to go on the record to express my strong opposition to the Martin Marietta Materials "Highway 34 Project" which will be considered at the Planning Commission hearing on July 21, 2015. While I wish to attend the hearing and express my concerns in person, I will not be able to do so because : n 'C (Uo c e.. n h \ t ot C i s t 5 Please accept my apology for my absence and recommend DENIAL of the project application on my behalf. Signature :, r Date: CW / 7/ 20 ) S Address: 6.. l_ O (OMB 4ur &1( R �f 1'14.5 -,GC , (6 5()631_, a.�--fit cL ; avl heicI /e.5- EXHIBIT Personal Statement To : Weld County Planning Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst i___ i g re-) n LON O- I , Acyvy G'N6 wish to go on the record to express my strong opposition to the Martin Marietta Materials "Highway 34 Project" which will be considered at the Planning Commission hearing on July 21, 2015 . While I wish to attend the hearing and express my concerns in person, I will not be able to do so because : vvogK Please accept my apology for my absence and recommend DENIAL of the project application on my beh If. ( . . Signature : Date : 76 94 5 Address: 9 7 5 3 / /O7--1 / g,11--- / I/ 9 ) 4(17 /MAO -is %/% EXHIBIT Personal Statement To : Weld County Planning Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst I, rib-)y\ ✓'oci A4Q ; 1 t wish to go on the record to express my strong opposition to the Martin Marietta Materials " Highway 34 Project" which will be considered at the Planning Commission hearing on July 21, 2015. While I wish to attend the hearing and express my concerns in person, i will not be able to do so because : Please accept my apology for my absence and recommend DENIAL of the project application on my behalf. Signature : eaczyl-,-e Date: 7 .-~ / 7 /g , Address: 77 6 gS øf'ook4vciT IOVQ /& &t4 c& EXHIBIT Personal Statement To: Weld County Planning Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst I, ga_m cc ) t' 1 I wish to go on the recorci to express my strong opposition to the Martin Marietta Materials "Highway 34 Project" which will be considered at the Planning Commission hearing on July 21, 2015 . While I wish to attend the hearing and express my concerns in person, I will not be able to do so because : 7 4 hq E3 n -�- z' C (C- d a c -to 571 " vim' ue , , , i - tR c_- \ i ac \ ? / e s! Please accept my apology for my absence and recommend DENIAL of the project application on my behalf. Signature : Z4/11(-t, �- �- ')--C` Date : 7T/ 1 5� , „; 'A /ac� �- Address: ?b95 <j �� `'�� CO�(cC EXHIBIT Personal Statement To : Weld County Planning Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst R1, wish to go on the record to express my strong opposition to the Martin Marietta Materials " Highway 34 Project" which will be considered at the Planning Commission hearing on July 21, 2015 . While I wish to attend the hearing and express my concerns in person, I will not be able to do so because : Ae t1/4=-( Please accept my apology for my absence and recommend DENIAL of the project application on my behalf. Signature: �G�. !y-tyl•� ( G��S' Date : 71/46775- Address g /Jag 7 .4 c/07071 ccb�� a Ss EXHIBIT cm_ D Personal Statement To : Weld County Planning Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst I , wish to go on the record to express my strong opposition to the Martin Marietta Materials "Highway 34 Project" which will be considered at the Planning Commission hearing on July 21, 2015 . While I wish to attend the hearing and express my concerns in person, I will not be able to do so because : 004 CO; almajan Please accept my apology for my absence and recommend DENIAL of the project applicatio half. Signatu Date: Fins 2045. Address.. 11 % R Jo hosiams. CO tCSJ EXHIBIT 1 7h:s Personal Statement To : Weld County Planning Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst 2LTT1t4A/ £ 41ei4i' 5 ' )� wish to go on the record to express my strong opposition to the Martin Marietta Materials " Highway 34 Project" which will be considered at the Planning Commission hearing on July 21, 2015 . While I wish to attend the hearing and express my concerns in person , I will not be able to do so because : Moe 70 Woff. . Please accept my apology for my absence and recommend DENIAL of the project application on my behalf. Signature : y Date : 7 - � 15 Address: ?DOS Cg 59 EXHIBIT Personal Statement To : Weld County Planning Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst I Lo -1-1 0 le__ Gi; ► 1 wish to go on the record to express my strong opposition to the Martin Marietta Materials " Highway 34 Project" which will be considered at the Planning Commission hearing on July 21, 2015 . While I wish to attend the hearing and express my concerns in person, I will not be able to do so because : \ v , y ,t v. , v t H ' '-H i (2 WM_ V c:32-‘. \Q. (1_ -1-; d O ,n ► CYA .1\. i- ' KA r-- -, pi l_ v, ( 1 oxAk ot 11.3110 v•-P \NC) L&Ai I \ Lace.; VIPs-Oki r ( Ollik. lielAAtidt re Please accept my apology for my absence and recommend DENIAL of the project application on my behalf. Signature : - 04 Date : / ` ) 1 is Address: 7113 bt/QYfA Letk&s ,a, ; „ l j4, (() , `05-3c . EXHIBIT Personal Statement To : Weld County Planning Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst S-41-e Zaii\ Aer wish to go on the record to express my strong opposition to the Martin Marietta Materials " Highway 34 Project" which will be considered at the Planning Commission hearing on July 21, 2015 . While I wish to attend the hearing and express my concerns in person , I will not be able to do so because : Ti Kose LLDt'f � Please accept my apology for my absence and recommend DENIAL of the project application on my behalf. Signature : SIMIDate : 7 — L!) -- 15 Address : 7 k 31 LoLCeS . Tokr\S-h"-mn, EXHIBIT Personal Statement To : Weld County Planning Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst I , Be/1/kig,t/(CCPt wish to go on the record to express my strong opposition to the Martin Marietta Materials " Highway 34 Project" which will be considered at the Planning Commission hearing on July 21, 2015 . While I wish to attend the hearing and express my concerns in person , I will not be able to do so because : J 1, out k vt d ( 0 -i\tAA.e-\:\-- (. 5 O e-Qo -Fowl e 44_ -- 1,-51, Please accept my apology for my absence and recommend DENIAL of the project application on my behalf. Signature : Date : Address : 71 3 ?, te gkohl ) k5 Poad a)531/ EXHIBIT 3 Personal Statement To : Weld County Planning Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst I , er Pc, -kin' 50n wish to go on the record to express my strong opposition to the Martin Marietta Materials "Highway 34 Project" which will be considered at the Planning Commission hearing on July 21, 2015 . While I wish to attend the hearing and express my concerns in person, I will not be able to do so because : t 1 1 i e._ e' '7 t to/O r4 a O spr: '1Cti r OA g v S i v1 Gn a- - 1- k �J Please accept my apology for my absence and recommend DENIAL of the project application on my behalf. F � V Signature : Date : )1/4574) Address : 7f (p) LAk0* / hs RaN . 1/43Lni k /7/ 60 EXHIBIT s S__13,43__ Personal Statement To : Weld County Planning Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst I , a «fer (4\k ,saw wish to go on the record to express my strong opposition to the Martin Marietta Materials " Highway 34 Project" which will be considered at the Planning Commission hearing on July 21, 2015 . While I wish to attend the hearing and express my concerns in person, I will not be able to do so because : --i- LA-kd r , , ) 4; /2-JAZ_ E?r ° rIrk-r 2o )( In Iscar- 4 c //sky _ T 4_2c:A i 6 vc. I . lit d vn 1 1, . ` _ le , , , ) 1 .`tre. Please accept my apology for my absence and recommend DENIAL of the project application on my behalf. Signature : �ir,1/4-'t- -- Date : 7/is is Address : 2 / L; 3 E A0 a /, is kll-1 JOAni - itiv co 8v5 3 7 EXHIBIT N Y D 3 Personal Statement To : Weld County Planning Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst !, M t C i4ii es'- L 44M wish to go on the record to express my strong opposition to the Martin Marietta Materials "Highway 34 Project" which will be considered at the Planning Commission hearing on July 21, 2015 . While I wish to attend the hearing and express my concerns in person, will not be able to do so because : &c oar e A 4l�4_ Please accept my apology for my absence and recommend DENIAL of the project application on my behalf. Signature . /. Date : /15 Address : `4.6)6 >a,s-tti c EXHIBIT I Personal Statement To : Weld County Planning Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst L t wish to go on the record to express my strong opposition to the Martin Marietta Materials "Highway 34 Project" which will be considered at the Planning Commission hearing on July 21, 2015 . While I wish to attend the hearing and express my concerns in person, I will not be able to do so because : 6d U4, nrt ii= 3Qctnditw3lut ±Lk5 Please accept my apology for my absence and recommend DENIAL of the project application on my behalf. Signature : ace t:/L) Date: 7 / - l Address : &goo Lam. to ( 4 , L2i EXHIBIT 1 TOD tijrs‘71AlcISOWitiPianning Commissioners Personal Statement To : Weld County Planning Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst wish to go on the record to express my strong opposition to the Martin Marietta Materials "Highway 34 Project" which will be considered at the Planning Commission hearing on July 21, 2015. While I wish to attend the hearing and express my concerns in person, I will not be able to do so because : ,L- Qrn "Ant-1(66tL a a S'T`S ( 7/ - 7474 on 145 int -05 , Please accept my apology for my absence and recommend DENIAL of the project application on my behalf, Signature . l7ne Date : 1 /3/2-a< r Address: G> -i 9 ,419. . 11-t L) ( S r�� 8-d EXHIBIT Personal Statement To : Weld County Planning Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst I QN- VVD \''t L , Cava wish to go on the 1 record to express my strong opposition to the Martin Marietta Materials " Highway 34 Project" which will be considered at the Planning Commission hearing on July 21, 2015 . While I wish to attend the hearing and express my concerns in person , I will not be able to do so because : meo- , 0 4 -ri Tee_ rcge5 eg, ihte W c.)tiSj Please accept my apology for my absence and recommend DENIAL of the project application on my behalf. c Signature : Dater-'� "\ -2-0 •42_ 01,S- Address : laUc, tAA40-rA C( ) Cr A, ceylc Cep g36CC31-/ EXHIBIT Personal Statement To : Weld County Planning Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst I , n n Orr wish to go on the record to express my strong opposition to the Martin Marietta Materials " Highway 34 Project" which will be considered at the Planning Commission hearing on July 21, 2015 . While I wish to attend the hearing and express my concerns in person , I will not be able to do so because : nr) saJ- +1 (-j ""\-OI-1-C ) W l icAn rte. uaoY- \C. S ` KLJ. Please accept my apology for my absence and recommend DENIAL of the project application on my behalf. Signature : 4,? , 1,r Date : 17 — o Is Address : is (Q3 /&tot& a CDIA. V4 Co gos3v EXHIBIT Personal Statement To : Weld County Planning Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst r �-- �—c ? C>AA:S. � Y-- wish to o on the I , ( cg record to express my strong opposition to the Martin Marietta Materials " Highway 34 Project" which will be considered at the Planning Commission hearing on July 21, 2015 . While I wish to attend the hearing and express my concerns in person , I will not be able to do so because : J1LL Please accept my apology for my absence and recommend DENIAL of the project application on my behalf. AS-- Signature : �`�`�'� ��- L Date : 7--i7 -- A Address: c_ - C_f) 'VC)a r. EXHIBIT Personal Statement To : Weld County Planning Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst / ?laity t eao1 cA Co-tAi, e k' wish to go on the record to express my strong opposition to the Martin Marietta Materials " Highway 34 Project" which will be considered at the Planning Commission hearing on July 21, 2015 . While I wish to attend the hearing and express my concerns in person, I will not be able to do so because : iLL Please accept my apology for my absence and recommend DENIAL of the project application on my behalf. Signature : ?lie.-7 Date : T ri g Address : E /spit? /ad /'ems r d n: ' rdter`'— EXHIBIT I'm Personal Statement To : Weld County Planning Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst 11 -e71 wish to go on the record to exp es my strong opposition to the Martin Marietta Materials " Highway 34 Project" which will be considered at the Planning Commission hearing on July 21, 2015 . While I wish to attend the hearing and express my concerns in person , will not be able to do so because : vk_sov r_ i_cit Please accept my apology for my absence and recommend DENIAL of the project application on my behalf. c� 7 -- fq --- / 5 Si gnature : � Date : Address : (1,) 1 .. ci &J&- & " I0k (\5+fflPY\ Le go y EXHIBIT Personal Statement To : Weld County Planning Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst I , A ICL/A- EIaLkwish to go on the record to express my strong opposition to the Martin Marietta Materials " Highway 34 Project" which will be considered at the Planning Commission hearing on July 21, 2015 . While I wish to attend the hearing and express my concerns in person , I will not be able to do so because : kr) I b [Arci Please accept my apology for my bsence and recommend DENIAL of the project application on my behalf. Signature : Date : Address : C 1 � � w 2<iCaQ� EXHIBIT Personal Statement To : Weld County Planning Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst O ,, h hrk_; > �� wish to go on the record to express my strong opposition to the Martin Marietta Materials " Highway 34 Project" which will be considered at the Planning Commission hearing on July 21, 2015 . While I wish to attend the hearing and express my concerns in person , I will not be able to do so because : M nj � F Please accept my apology for my absence and recommend DENIAL of the project application on my behalf. / Signature : - Date : 7_9 / J Address : /0571 Ami ( ki • EXHIBIT ctStk I Personal Statement To: Weld County Planning Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst \J-0111H--k ( n wish to go on the record to express my strong opposition to the Martin Marietta Materials "Highway 34 Project" which will be considered at the Planning Commission hearing on July 21, 2015. While I wish to attend the hearing and express my concerns in person, I will not be able to do so because: un -in -fnt) a 11 'at \ d .r' &not) _c csN alkind koirtiler 6 Please accept my apology for my absence and recommend DENIAL of the project application on my behalf. SignatureLv 'K C44 Date: -1 2 � 7/ lS' Address: / 11 girl fir. j �•. r `` EXHIBIT A rJ - - -�iil .:. 4114 4 3 I. i it .. _ . -:3 is, . il CI 161 ile ale r• 4 40 es S----. ii, 1 a 4 ILL -• : • 4 ids , f • re 0.6 .. 14 8.- Lielilliglit, As Ifill 113 It •sk ,,,,,aii, • ,. .. , i , ,,, .,,. ig . , tr 5. t 41 Ai e . 4-0 ...g .... ali ‘ e • • rte' + 0 I lin illt ' 4sipb.i. , NI a Ni. f , . 1\ . , , & ... . . l . , , . _ a „,............... el k _, 6 t (� • ' � �+ Lofty Road b ,,f. 11111 se Q'_ cC. • EXHIBIT g W.I R 0 • 1 etink-___, 4 litik , g P I 114, as . . • • , i , ` e • 4' at 1e • • a . \ . ll. lillit. :71 . 4.• k 1 N rs, Ihi- ' er. 1 - '• • 'II ' ' ?it-' * • 1 re 1 1 • '''' 0 G _ �' 0 Al _ _ U .tom - Li 4 Re \ . ... 0 r I.,.., .., la ...- • PA . diill _ a 1 sit 'J Lo .Mty Road 56 Vitt 1 EXHIBIT r UN 1 16111 I•• r '4t . ni. flp r�r r ~ 7 igbittas . W 11 ties .a - • 4 • ' . _ 'r1.+ .. 1 1 i , . I r• as, ao _ l >I • ► ♦ r 1 / 4 I a e . . • S+ . ' .e r IF - - -.61 . 0 al . , u �./� it Illimithi FR 4.4 S .".--7.74r - 1,, - ' - II, r i t `., ►w • 1 - ".. . . V ' •- 1.___ , • i . - ., . *It; ...._....„1 .•1 © '4, Ctt .Mty Road 56 e,,e ti\,0_*,LA CL, EXHIBIT Ye; C:tW . , sal . • i 0 I. •1 ..- I . V . 0.• .i I , ... b • 11 , • a a .v 1 ' s ' •r' 1 w 1. •sIn • ' • i 'a • .��`., ,: i , J• ; 461 6.) • •• ,ip, 116. . . . . . ill "1: , ... _.- r el 111 a. . ai .. . g , . 4. . . ... . . F ..1 1 Ire. • •..rl i . sAlli: }} ,, � �' ', (r • . : ,�r+ty Road 56 ....Se. e 4„., ,,,c. EXHIBIT i 4.4 q Qgli_ 0• ri • rte. II • 1 •• » • • ail , . t-cess, •• Pr)ti‘sti ct * . ' r, ' , 1 et • i IT iii ,* ar *4 ♦ • • • •� J 1 1 _ H 4 o" • f - o • , .a { • `tConi Road 56 ik ` d ty '1/2 t. --t'; SQ.....e ii\o........a.„..e..icc.. EXHIBIT d D A ice.• ► . . 1_•► - + • - i ,,,, _si. � � ^ • -t • 'Q ' 1 - . • . 1 � r� a • • .‘‘ 1.44 t I ° .1 :lat 4 ril • i • 4. - . • .1 j J. . s 1 or ., , . _ 1 �,! t. i , .. . . .t . _,• . . e _ • .ti g t I , ..ti n "it • 11 • J a a • , Ct uu ty Road 56 •+ igr. r I. a Sas, (1.0.-0„-act EXHIBIT CO el . : 1,- . — • . • . - , far- C . t :o' : : I i III ii. 1: sr * I I 4 a I ill Ill .1 ie.:, et! 1 - t 4,, - • IA old 0 (144.44 i LL' b , t r - .a„� i.t I ed E.r ' ► � 5 (a 46,1 0 .mil } c a... 0 \ 4 014 it timpalli- . . . „ \-- ie.. : . , yrk. ...., . ,I. �9, � .. pad 56 ad gip&?_,e, AO_PLJCQ • EXHIBIT 1 3 --------------____ mem: reXTM . 52X ` 7o4MB 1 80min , EXHIBIT I 7/20/2015 Martin Marietta Highway 34 Project Dave Kisker Agenda ■ Introduction ■ Background ■ Review of Project ■ Conclusions What is CLR -34 Neighborhoods Assn? ■ CLR-34NA is a non-profit corporation that was organized to offer input relating to land use issues to the various jurisdictions surrounding the intersection of US-34 and County Line Road (WCR s3, LCR i) ■ Represents about 250-300 people ■ Not restricted ■ Funded solely by donations EXHIBIT I IC04 7/24/2015 Agenda Introduction Background Review[Ibftroject Martin Maria Highway 34 Conclusions Project Dave[lKisker What is CLR-34 Neighborhoods Assn? MMM vs. CLR-34NA CLIRD34NANsIltilltionlThrofitEtorporationEthatO wasE rganizedi of ffer0nputC elatingiloEllandEl Headquarters Raleigh,l},C Apache Rd.,IJHE usefssuesliol heE I'ariousEIurisdictionsE Region Entire[ftountry Weldlounty,t 'orthern0 Colorado surround ingllhelntersectionl fIES034E ndEi Primaryiltctivity Aggregate,fltoncrete,0 Advocate4NorfSensible0 County[ ineIRoad[ WCREL3,ELCRL .) Asphalt Oevelopmentt3 nsloCO 53.28 Revenue 1.3.28 so RepresentsaboutlasoCgool4beople Assets 57.48 52600 Not! estricted Employees/Members 7193 14 FundedI olely[bylitlonations jiNOTCI ocal t Could[iot[be0 MORE[Docal! Analysis of The MMM US-34 project Weld County Code Compliance Criteria for approval of u5R EssentialEDuestions IsallbRegal uselibnderl he[ 'VeldlLounty[rode? Isf he[project,[ s[llescribed,liompliant with[ heD _ConsistenftithlWeld countyrcomprehensivetRlan NO! Code,l3ectionsl&2E ndE 3? Is�he4brojecti s[described,Ctompliant ivith[the� ConsistenttWithQntentCbfl griculturalDistrict NO! Weldfounty[Eight(Eo[iarm? Conservatiocft RIMEEFarmland NO! Ca alnyUllmpactsEbeE 1nitigated? Compatibleatith6AastertlansafrAffectedliommunities NO! CompatibleavittffxistingalsesCbf[surroundingW1eighborhoods N O! ProtectiorsLf leafth,l'6afetyanceiVelfare,'iaftdountytResidents NO! 1 7/24/2015 Sec. 23-3-10. Intent of Ag Zone Weld County Code Compliance The[MAgriculturalgoneuD istrictfllsUhtended[iocfbrovide0 areasliodhegtonducafiligriculturallitictivitiesandglictivities0 related[ o®griculture[hnd agricultural roductionE rr--r withoutlitheNnterferencenbflibther,E incompatibleNandr!JSES. C TheDmAgricultural)[ oneIDistricttegulations[ireIE established®oGjbromotenelealth,C afetyf ndOjeneral0 welfa refiliiiheEihresentai ndEfutureRtesidentsafril hen COUNTY. USE by special review (USR)— 3 WELD County Code—Sec. 23-3-4O Agricultural district Uses Allowed by Special Review Uses[fby3peciall2Reviewlitequire[additional tonsiderationatoansure0 A. MineralCfesourceE IevelopmentC acilitiesUncluding: thadheylbreastablishedaindlibperatedEingagnannerEthatilsEl 4.ffY sphalt[ ndloncrete[latch plants. compatible withlAxistingllandRblannedUlandlISESITKIlheD 7. Transloading NEIGHBORHOOD. There are two basic types of plants used to manufacture hot mix asphalt TheClldditionallitonsiderationarlilegulatioatikestby[SpecialtReview,andLl Batch plants, which make asphalt in thS IicationrJ.[tbftl�erformance®esi n[�nd® erationsi�tandards]..Fl batches as needed to go straight to pp 9 P work sites Erm-11111 areRlesi ned[tor�brotectC nd4bromote[ heLbealth ❑� Drum plants, which make asphalt g / ' continuously and can store the safety,lonvenienceandEteneraINyelfardbEtheE asphalt for several days in heated storage silos. present[; nd[futureLiesidents! f[ helI0UNTY. TheLBAMM5sphalttiblanttisaaounterEflowalrumanitantl3vhichlperatesEl continuously.® 7 Batch Plant vs. Drum Mix Plant Conflicting code sections? (hlnr jitst,ai4rffrrrn+r in nnmoonly) LoadsairanadeRbnlin5sEheededllasisa Hot storageRilosasedRol3toretjbroduct Sectioralno typicallyao[hotL3toragSvailable. USREfrif3AgfItonel]hcludesEtConcreteC nasphall atch[fblant"® f NotHnodifier Asphalt@ementr;bddecticaggregate ink Asphalt@ement®ddedl1ontinuouslyQo! batches aggregate t Section@ .®•E•301 JsesL JIowedRy[ tight[ [ [ ndtm•enistricts G9_,... 1 __ pL..h1.. ri, j?I . . _......a_,...ia_._. �._ .a.. .D 6 „Bsa. .,..r•, 3r1 1 aat t, l,,..iIJL.,_..Q_.„r..•�•••rl .tsl schedule. first!trucklloadttbut—mayi1 ahe®niddle exclusivelyrloairanaite@onstructiongbrojectC?3rCtlhe@ompletionflbfilB oflhelbightllorRargegbbs PUBLICtoadls'tnprovements[ roject....'IID Batch plants®ypicallyhavefltdown'TdimeEl Drum plantslbperateslIontinuously,llilllilay,I eachnilayebsorucks!becomeavailable everytlayliuringtisphald*eason Then nlyl eference[ of Ibermanentasphalt[�bperation®nl�he0 Ca ac' ftbatch Ian !call IndustrialEtone[ order[ [1J1SR.® p ityi� p Nlyyp' y@P Jess° 0perationalitimet#or@IrumE lanNislypically2l tharalrumllblant. 47p l noreEthantlortbatchrtblant CanCarathigheitimpactillSeibeCtillowedgnahefagElonetbAUSREthangnEl theandustriali oneUby[Right? It's[ L /IAJORC Iifff g S S T UStPA,ffebruaryloo5 2 7/24/2015 Section a Compliance MARTIN MARIETTA'S IMPACTS ON John Cummings FARMING AND WATER QUALITY • -441114.—ne ass • REMOVESCIPRIMELIFARMLANDIWRODUCTION GENERATEL SIG NIFICANTL:�C0NTAMINANTSfI:P0LLUTANTS,LI VIOLATES "RIGHTl70iARML CHEMICALS,LfUGITIVEL1DUSTIUTC.LFHATEIUVILLIJMPACTL J Ir11 LIVILIV I "C VW-NI EnfnUALITYMN DLIERORPRODUCTIONL\NDIA QUALITY. DOESWO I u I M PACTLAGRILTAINMENTL�ANDI,GRIIT0URISML DOESLNOI I?l FARM ERSL OPERATIONSLLNDLffHEISJ1OTHERLOVEL*DRGANICLI FARM)PE RATION. • I •S . •... .an , 'I.rn OALS 112, 9 AND 10: THE, MARTIN ""` "'"''""` , alas L _ : ILLn p 3 7/24/2015 r" r .. ail ,/ *;' : F( • '•.'1` • L �'es. , . li 1r1/4:II ii 4 ", . a Rn •- •tea• .e at ^- Tia � .ti r. 4��•"iii • n • _._ p sY ". a.' A oi.�_ s• -� +...If. •'7. • 1 •- -"d- .'el. 14".•� .• 1 � ••a + . ?la 1 �� -w�.V. yti. . grZ•CIAft::: :Lef�1'*?e,.'lep' 1e" qtr'" _• ! tb + d1;'.*• 4' s+' -ilialis-r_ will[3lmpact[ gricultureI1bracticesW MARTIN MARIETTA DEVELOPMENT DOES NOT MEET THE INTENT OF SECTION 22-2-10-AGRICULTURE....APPROPRIA'1'E LAND USE MARTIN MARIETTA'S MISSION IS Ira -- IN DIRECT CONFLICT WITH �.•.„ - AGRICULTURE PRODUCERS M1 J It • �� t a ti� QUANTITIES OF PM } • 1M a _ , NI.ut"I IN MARIETTA'S DEVELOPMENT IS AN IRRESPONSIBLE ATTEMPT TO CIRCUMVENT THE AGRICULTURE GOALS AND • POLICIES OF WELD COUNTY 4 7/24/2015 IMMilbrilk- 22% DIRECTLYLIIELATEDQ'OmREDEPENDENTM 15% UPONRAGRICULTURE 12% 10% 9% 1% 6% 5% MARTI NL!VIARI ETTAmOES['IOTE 1 MEETLTHIS[POLICYL Ft Collin itI , f tM 1 J • . I Great Western c (In )— ... .- d Inuatrir I l Park —(-I Sea?. % m neso • �,... ..,TVII I _Greeley • Lo`irelaoZl ` 1' m - �- ra -S ,y. 4iIll( 111.,CI . ; ' IinsiOVYn ti. UP agile - r� • Milliken N w - cc) PROPRIETY I q I X RE:I4NI. T _ t , III I PROPER - NI •IVIHK I IN IVIHKIt I IA J PLAIN I U HUD I-ILL I U KHIJt I Ht ioIIIIIIIIIIII 7/24/2015 ' ys MU I HEKLUVL S QUALI I Y S IANUAKUS Alit EX I KEMtLY HIGH n .� _ 1� t �• _ � Imo. ` 7S^ w r Imo' •t, e:.•• itk • 77: w '.� � 141 Compatibility with future development of the surrounding Compatibility with the existing area surrounding land USES. Gavle kicker were raised ay Jonnstown Windsor Greeley regard ing'ncompati .i ity0 AIICintrue ! ! Surrounding Land Use Map Protection of the health, safety and welfare of county residents iot ections1nteach[dountaere( valuatedaor heir(Dand&ttises. Weldaounty[iand3Jse Larimeriiountyftandilse w Ay 4`r:; .if.Er •Relt•KIPUD) x:Ag •AgIRet I rattle •Ind •RemO10AI ii N SO •IND . 68e •Comm Noise •ComntIOND •m em,, 11k Emissions,CDdor,C iealthilmpacts RealLEstateLPropertytN/alues TheltLR[WNEIGHBORHOODS re:NOTU Genera Mom patibiIity primarilyflndustnal,rand3re,notFplal nedicae© industrial!! 6 7/24/2015 Trafficlimpact[3tudyf+fechnical[?i . MIST CONCEITS ReviewMt;ndt ommentstili Traffic �~ ' Traff cimpactf6tudy[�reparedtiormhe6 ., • �'• ' MartinWlariettallllllaterialst i HighwayI34[3ite,© prepared[ty6 E ugenelt.ICoppola,IJP.E.,12l !, IIIIIIIIII.PIPIIIIIIPIInH . Marchl27,[tt015 Technicall1eview(b nd@omments© areElbasedabrnheadequacyDbfl3 salGattiairS thelfIS(Ln[LddressingibachEH requirementilbfC heIMIeIcII l-..isullilk _ Cou ntyLfrafficfim pact[ tu dytr Checklist MMMIFIGHWAYI234LEVELOPMENTDPROPOSAL TRAFFICIIMPACTt3TUDY[ITTIS)IWECHNICALNEVIEW® TRAFFICI MPACTISTUDYI TTIS)ITECHNICALIREVIEW SUMMARY ct Technicalliteviewquerformedi1 yIRtayIa.[t/1oe • DoesJ4OT@ompiy[Svith['9Neld[County4IISttequirements RRetired3n[11014[From(aSAIIssociates,®nc.I fterC 9Cyears • AssumptionsLior1irip[ eneration[ nd©rip(Hlistributionlihot�erifiable • TISIfocused[ibn[9imitedl5rea13rs@omprehensiveltiequirement prepared[X100'sfib flSflot[ ommunities( hroughoutLI15 • TIS14IidLNOTikonvert®ruck®ripst1o[tassengerlCar[Cquivalents4PCE)® LManaged[3IlnajorLlransportationLbrojects reportingLimyIl neEtrurStt1ruellrnpact Cdarned[distinguished[' ational[ wardsBiortiexpertise • TISatissumed[i,nfunded0uturellexpandedat1534[ttonfigurationl3sfbxisting6 configuration • International[test[Wracticesirlanning[3tudylilwardl2Iwards} • FHWA/FTA ransportation tanning[ xcellencel3lward • Proposedl73perationfavill[8esultliniiidditionalft400LtruckiA ripslt}MAJOR impact toff xisting[ ongestedtinfrastructure ( IPrincipalf8n1tharge1 nd1ProjectFManagerabfaturrentit • TIS[ifidGNOTtitcludet3nalysisllbf[iailroadlirnpactflntloaditetwork Greeleyl nd[Loveland11AastertWransportationEPlans • Negates extensivelltollaborativelblanninafforaftaurrounding jurisdictions relatingio[3Js34l ndablternativelioutes Greaterfl We l dlio u ntyiraff i cam pa ctl3tu dyEI Traffic4l (TIS)11fRequirementsEhecklist Impact0Study© r: . _a . Area Site Information Description of Use MNImel i s+' Hours of Operation No "�Number cg Employees NO Mxena*Haut HoSes NU rj -..-. ._.. knotty d My Map Minimally •- Sete e + Men YES /bA Existing Site Conditions Roadway Network minimally analysis of Podod Minimally Exiting Traffic Data . Futuna Conditions and Impacts Trip C-enarabon No f�� fqL - � Trip Distribute° NO MMMI�Yla rket[Area Shod Term Background Traffic 15 Years) NO Long Tann Background Traffic 00.20 Years) NO 1 Level of Service Maysis with Prr{etl NO Level of Service Deficiencies NO s•..L. . _.. Bgnal Warrant Analysis NO Ausxlay Tum Lae Wane*Analysis NO S.ghl Oistaltt5 Aralyss NO OtherbnpaW NO ....e..� Mitigation Mxelary lanes length ano storage capaaN NO i Corrector*for LOS Oofc ancles NO i .;.t.. . ... Corrections for any a:cass deficiencies NO av Sgn:g&Sbipig NO . • •• t'i0 Pavamgnl Maintnrance NO I Intersection Rath for truce turn movements NO ti� - L 1 Figures 1 Tables `\r / Conclloions&Supporting Araysis } •.• 7 7/24/2015 MartinitAarietta[tAaterials[klighwayl34tSitearafficflmpactlarea Not115t 4L1 lit.y cool ,cstrtcts.. : Accelerationflane . Se n! rucrtek ₹frs { Access to.U$_ $ ` t _ {� $ USCS4 - Trucks.Not_ US[ 4 / Allowed ( ) i s/ r RonaldCl Right@rl Ln ArbitrarOnd' ITETrafficitmpactiStudyltuidelines:i The' Right®utilOnly 'V determinationvormettraffiampactatudytbrea� - ReaganO � ' M -._,tt, i 1,,,,...e.iiru IneicellmItroiltagel$ f'I., .± Support cannottbeibrbitrangindianustEbefivelatiocumented.M Boulevard c '' — U Roadll$ndt�R2L3l he® CC m "ii Examplel8vouldbahat6®ule6vherelil'goadl�ria —I U ' Dirtlftoad �-► onlya8vay@o/froma 5t$4 i ntersectionllvouldlancludedantithelkvaluationl;tA? r CC U U impacted yl rojectlRraffidby3nore@hanl�26 .� k TheLErafficl tuciytstates,Lttheirelim( rontagefar r oaditlsZ ""N ,---\\ I not@'onsideredaelevant-", nd': heRntersection3vithL'J LCR©.8 r nCRr34 4 CRE1.3[IlinclEthampactsito;l<elim'alvereibottonsidered. TheltvaluationflbfilheL3elimlfrontage toadflindILRLZJ.3[J intersectiongrtusffilisclose[ /IMM3frafficllimpacts[ nd[7 i a •i mitigationsEtefore)Eonsideringcthef11MM[lievelopment. - Existingt lM/PMI] Trip[3eneration:Etailad'eakCFour[lrips[byf izeIIfC1levelopmentEl It- ea" Peaks#lour© and[1TE[II'rip[Eenerationfvlanual['SYip[Eenerationlaates Level[ibf['Service:l7 I? USC 4illkciiiMist± LevelNoCIV ft5er affic 1. Institute raffictEngineersff ITE)[llript7 GenerationEVlanuaI[ - DailyB&iPeakl1our[lrips[by© - size[bf@levelopmenttbasedtbntlraffiditounts® _. ...:_t___ StopttontrolllntersectionlOSIN from[1IkellacilitiesAI e rn iiii Thresholdsgsecondsibf®elay) ` 2. Newlitraffic@ounta n[Bimilar[4acility. A 10(8econdsl;lbrlless • Average®elayaaed?Vehicle® iii i /F B _lo.]tltot4sfSeconds 3. Triptenerationfialculation[WasedlibnCapplicants® 21418econdsg3.51JAinutes) C 1S.1ttotr35l8econds ii hoursribniperation,lhe[.humbert.bf@mployees,f1 r 1 c' D 25.1@0('844l�econds �— E 35.101o345econds truckEtripsg ypegAggregate,f oncrete[ tEI TheNrafficatudyBtates;i? rn F Greatert0hantcondsconds Asphalt1onstibf[ roductt*nfafipeaklitlayfhlividedE9 U by@ruck[kapacity)I nd@imeRbff'Illay,[ hatt anIbe© "this[ level[�}Service)[tsl2 CC Average,Delay.ferNVehicleP ' 1,allseconds423.5Alinutes) verified[ ndC eproduced. consideredMormal atatopa - l ., The[traffiampactf tudy( tatesErSite[ ra c[SvithatrI 2ite© controlledllntersectionsVtturingell activities[fullgunctionalRvas1IIeterminedEbased(in© 1 urban1 ieakl1tourttonditionsr:® - _ operator[tstimatela.Professionally[lhisgskllnacceptable.® __r s PassengerEarEquivalents Trip( Generation[fromI Trafficf3tudy[Lonverted111 TruckRrripsL oFPassengerILart quivaIents MorninglPeaklliour AfternooniPeakliour Daily In I Out In Out r: quivaients IfellS gin 40 78 40 20 986 120 234 120 60 2958 1 3 Cars 67 67 134 Total 107 78 40 87 1,120 I rleirallrtgatuuy[3 td tCSOl UrlerfUf gal ULItabIIr»urrleUEIcrIT vassengerltarilqulvalents 42/ SlL lbll 14/ S.U9t (equal)f$hreeNssenge►aars." Loneerm Trucks 75 152 55 30 2,074 However,[3heLtv1MMi raffid tudyflnlyl onvertedIlrucks®o0 Passenger@ar qulvalents 225 456 165 90 6222 Cars 93 93 186 passenger@arfiequivalents5 vhenl ddressingiiurnal.ne[ toraget i Total 169 153 55 123 2,260 on[JS[34.t Fruckfiripsl lvere[lihot[konverted[iotibassengerfkar• Passengerltartfquivalents 318 456 165 183 6,408 equivalents[intsheahortQermC ndatm erm( raffidlImpact7 ':` ;' analysis.) ThereforeAnlylbnetlthird[�bfi he[lruckC raffidlisEl ,` _ _ At�enI1ripsf ert:swelling[unit,[ [ esidential[ ievelopment[ vithlE accountedRforlin@heC raffic[ nalysis. 640[ Ingle[lamilylklwelling@nitsNvouldlltqual ,400LliailyM passenger@arNehicleIrips.Erhis®ncreasef1significant.® 8 7/24/2015 USC 4n. CRQ3 r Project!Daily:?Traffic.VolumellmpactslfbnllJ5134 4M1 t r 1J5134 US:04:r1 WestiMICRf33 EastfbflR33 Year EBR NW. NBT NBR WBL ExistingJwerage37ailarafficfNolumes 40,000 4C.000 AM I PM AM I PM AM I PM AM I PM AM I PM ProlectedlbhorttrernlBackgrounduallaraffldwolumes 42,000 42,000 Existing 7 7 11 5 1 6 10 I 6 20 12 — ShortAermIProJecttallyldraffIdfronJrafflddtudy 780 _ no Total6hortErermlhackgroundrraff dMProjecarafdlrorrv6raffid5tudy 42,780 47,3I 0 ShorC3ern4Background 5 5 10 5 N 5 10 5 20 15 Projectttall g y6raffltll�dJustedRoWassen eliSarRqulvalents 1,968 :'1>i shonferrM3otat rithEMMM 71 35 69 - 56 N 5 29 41 61 25 Total3hortErernerafffdNFrojecNJraffidwassengerliartEquivatents 43,968 _ 2.310 shortserrmirotaL7vithblMMYCE 131 95 187 86 67 113 143 45 ShordiermlPercentiirojectltfraffidampacts --► 4.91 2.46 MMM6ra0idlrl pactsRomDared1 25201 1800,1 17704 16201 N N 570.1 21601 6154 2501 td5hortffennl8ase - Pro ectedIon _ J g6ermBackgroun®allyf'Iraffitl3!olumes 66,800 66,800 Longfferm1ProjectfDally6rafdr%mTrafflcI5tudy 1,600 60.1 Longt3ermmackground 10 10 20 10 N 10 15 10 35 20 TotaIaong6ern ackgroundJraffidM'ProjecfaraffdlrotrUraffid5tudy 68,400 67,404_ ProJectltalh/fdraffidkdJustedtdoPassengentardEqulvalents 4,079 2,009_ Totallongererm2fotalaMltFdMMM 117 51 134 83 N 10 53 60 96 34 Totallaonglderrnaraffidwro$ec83raffidlassengerltaraquivalents 70,879 68,809 LonglRerml7fotaI tIdINMMIPCE 229 133 362 127 129 76 134 62 LongtPerm(PercentiProjectffraffictimpacts 6.11 3.01 MMM6miGdimpactstiompared3 21901 12301 17101 11701 N N 760.1 660,1 2831 21U to6hortlTermease TheseMreE ignificantilmpact tolLI5ia413hf hichtfttitu rrentlyth Trafficf tudy:(j'SitegMMM)1rafficRbntRfz13[1s[ininor." experiencingitongestion TrafficstudyElxssumedrl5eometryII nclifrafficItontrol EvaluationfandliMitigationl5equencinghBsiPresentedtlnlffraffictimpactlStudyhl • • 2 ShortaTermLa Project@ OK: NoilkdditionaI@AddiShortM OK: No dditional .4 . _ ,./' �� ' tl (TISI'1lssumesl3ignallrkndTy improvements@ 4 TermSAMMel. improvements'?' e- u•14 I usn lanetimprovements) required Traffic required * LongiffermtlloGProject® OK: Notadditional Addlong@ OK: Nof�dditional, • �+dLI• • . karate LW, (TISgssumesl*ixllanetdVSL improvements@ Termc3v1MM improvementsi?! ��rrff 34f�ndi3nterchange) required Traffic required June W.CI111 LuligMent. ThearaffidStudytlassumesITkn@ TheirafficattudyassumesatithirdahroughN Evaluationand[3vlitigationt5equencing®sMequiredl raffidimpactlfjtudyiEuidelines® additionalMorthIboundffight® IaneflnMach@Jirectiorelong@JS34,t5LlignaM turntianeland bilignal. andE ossiblyrenllnterchange. I ShorttJermasio6ProjectlS OK: Not5dditionallf Addtshort@ Not®K:ffieec ignallH No@ignal(trf5eparate® DueJlo®hellackdafilederalllunding,@JSL4® (Existinglloadway) improvements@ 4 TermlcAMMI+D &tintersectioImprovement s northboundilightlurntlaneIsPi remains[JtlesignatedLsl5l#ourllane@ required Traffic Improvements committed.fg expressway)'frl@heM035tfonglitange@ Transportationll'lansMeNeld@ / OK: Not5dditionalLt Addll.ongRJ Not®K:Weedtli@ �\. ! Longlf<ermWoirroject9 Countylrityfaftreeleylandl a eI ., improvements@ *AddllTermDDAMM Lanef3Jstt eedl (Existing(Roadway) NorthffrontatangeEMPO.�herells@ required _ Traffic Interchangetlltll8133 � /1 noiundedMignallitrf3-iterchange. WeldnEounty,JEreeley,J3oveland,ONindsor,i'Bohnstown,@ Milliken,(5ndhfvansiliavettllfltooperated@nrdhe(8 Signal Warrant Analysis developmentObfaategionalf Ian@olibrovideqarallel@ routeslloIlJSJ$4llolifvoidglending(3tJisasterttivenel ",,a0lIttree. 500 N limited1ederalf3ransportationtllollars ci - -a. C! -l( ' oad5 • ,i - - - rir . E 400 Minott6treet@ ' o Signalt3Narrant@ > 300 VolumeLThreshold . ., ��` 200 8 / I r1 C' t .,iti ,• ._,, Existing Existing Short Short Long Long • w S �. � AM PM Term Term Term Term ;t' s -.� § ..I n AM PM AM PM , Y LCR[�18 tRh• '.• Approvingi hellvlMMJ lroposalavithCS,40allailytz • Background • MMM ;. t en d tripsCimpacting@lSla4®loes®totiirtaket8ensel ndu �'� — Jr willIYYequiret:WeidXounty,ti6reeleylioveiand,0 '% V Windsor,®ohnstown,lt 1iIIiken,®nd#vanstlo@ Who hould[ ayL orL he[ ignal?I 1 scrambleliotiry@daeterminefIvhanxiolai,�elttlol ow! MMMiT1006 .i�Joibnef lseU'triggers(lts�teed. w 9 7/24/2015 CosthfCSignalDelaylloKommutersYbfti1JS[S4 — - - ` _ • � •_r• _ Peak Hour Vehicle Delay in Hours-US 34 Traffic . - $ 60 ,tljL� ron a.e .aaBackgroundiTraffid�NoNIMM r' o 50 -- - -' _ .� _ 40 �r MMMi3raffiU3Ter1?sl9? or ;(, LongLTermCJorthL7 `t O 10 U ii BoundL •_.. eftl rurnM -``' 'n Existing Short Term Short Term long Torn Long Term 4 MMM6rafficL>-PCE(r.Adjusiment a (No signal) (No Project 8 (with Project (Na(No Project& (with Project La neC�RueuemmpactsC r, - ,..a No Signal) &With Signal) No Signal) &With Signal) (bbl ercentile) - ' � ' Noalignall G1'lollielay pax With[SignalN28NecondMielayl erNehiclel hortEterm `r�ax - ' LeftLrurnl?rransitionliane Withaignall t501 econdEiielayi er[VehaclelbrIgterm gste CRL�l3ttan3hot e (videned cross CostlioRnotoringQlublic[ E 1,000,000[�ber4earatQninimumaivage Gteat� - _x14_ . theltreatMesterntatailroad . a ce Note:CIPfhea ehicleallelayland[motoristatosta faylelaylElvithCaNignalaislased 1�_a V Warning:LEQueueanalysismasedanL onaalSix[ianel115[t84.11fheaikstimateaibfillielaytandaltost(bfttlelaylAvouldaibeN - 61aneL11534.MYVithtaltlanetliSt341,I significantlyahigherL1vithElhea xistinglioura1anea115[34. queuesr ,ill(betsignificantly3ongeru ti• ,_ate thanllllustrated. cir IT.s7- •0 r-_ I Summary1bffffrafficatelated®ssues ►ai 1►1 , �;i f -- 1.1. The[MartintWlariettal dlaterials[}Iighway[34ESite[ffraffic0 , ' - 1r` 'W4 Im act[�Anal sisliloesIhot@om I ithlihe[ilVeld[�Lount , -W"? E _ p Y p YC�1u y© . ,itax.:•ii: TrafficimpactlStudytitequirements,® " < '.l Trainl.tmpacts[1 nL?1 RoadwayI1JJetwork0 2. Fundamental ssumptions[including[irip[�enerationEitndW k ` ~ were otlivaluated. trip[ilistributionNyere[f,rovidedEbyllhe[itpplicantaitndlian© ,, �-. ` ' %. illi f not[JbeCieproduced[ilbrtlerified, j ��kg ` 3. Theli!ntireEStudylitrea�imited[ioqustabneESegmentalfltMI f : *. �; • ` \ 13litndE2helintersectionESvithF4JSa84Eitndlilismissesabther® „NJ . f J . • haul[il?outesEitsflequiredtbyllINeld[tountyt'ffraffic®mpactEI \ ` _ - . • Study[itequirements,0 . . . �. 4. Theiirafficli;tudyQJidaitot@onvert[irucklirips1ioPassenger© 4C-0ocomotives naQ173 I. . • Carttquivalents1 ndl'bnlytieportsabne[thirdlbfIlhe[3ruem trainalarsilitlt52flleett'1 =I ''s"L`-o- ‘ • ' impacts,EI Lb,300f1eet • `� 5. Thea'iraffiatud p•` y[ilid[itot[ionsider[iailroad(im act, Su m ma rylafRrrafficLl(elated®ssues 62J The1raffiStudy®ncorrectly[itssumed[i+[Signal,Eintersectiontiiiir1 improvements,interchange[itndLSvideninglbf[i1S34E4romE l Noise Concerns uSR15-0027 fourtioESixlianes1 allLJbfIivhichF relilnfunded)Eiandliequires® reanalysis,E I 7.® The[ troposedIIIMMIlrojectCaivillltiesult[inaitnEi,dditionall11 6,400CIJailyllrips[itndCiesultin1 ignificant[iraffic®mpacts,lI Gary Oplinger massiveaiiueues,1ailinglievelsabfl3ervice,liindiinotoringm CLR-34 Neighborhoods Assn. publiaravelLlosts,E nd "Citizens for Responsible Development" 8. Therproposed[project is11n1 trossiiurposesaNvithlhel?7 extensiveltollaborativel lanninga ffortEbetweenTWeldti County,Eiireeley,EiWi ndsor,l1ohnstown,llovelandaitnd® MillikenaiolimprovelrafficikonditionsLitlon flheEi1S[34© corridorglitilizingdesslimpactfulliand[ises[itnd[fbromotine alternativetiouteslit IongEfl'O"l3treetl'Etrossroads© Bou Ievard[ ndltRP18/CR[ii4. - - 10 7/24/2015 Industrial noise standards are not compatible With Weld County Code 14-9-50: the adjacent and future residential areas, o A noise originating on private property shall be measured at or within the boundary of the O s property from which the noise complaint is t, made. ` `/ 4 d 5 Residential Zone and Non-Specified Areas: �' ' i`= I^ ! ' j 55 dB(A) day/ 50 dB(A) night. ,� 1 Industrial Zone: 80 dB(A) day / 75 dB(A) Y ��'`"� W,�� : night. 1-.N Colorado Revised Statutes 25- 12- 101 : Y��, i, �, ::.:. o Sound levels of noise radiating from a property - line at a distance of twenty-five feet or more ;t ')► therefrom in excess of the db(A) established for the following time periods and zones shall 4�Y constitute prima facie evidence that such noise is a public nuisance: ,� Residential Zone: 55 dB(A) day / 50 dB(A) " s night. :( / ' Al Industrial Zone: 80 dB(A) day / 75 dB(A) night. D: E _� ,` .a Y , ,. i • ' Maw Noise on Weld County Road 13 If RESIDENTIAL noise standards cannot The thousands of MMM trucks traveling County be maintained within residential areas due Road 13 daily will generate much noise. to the operation of the proposed Martin Marietta facility, then this is evidence that Mitigation is not practical. Continuous the facility cannot meet the standards of monitoring will be needed to determine WCC 23-2-220 and 23-2-230, because the whether allowable limits (86 dBA greater than industrial use is NOT COMPATIBLE with 35 mph) are exceeded. current and planned land uses. 11 7/24/2015 MMM's noise analysis was careless. MMM's analysis omits key facts. c> Key measurements were taken on a date when mTrain coupler slack / unslack noise can be the wind was 8 mph, gusting to 37 mph. CRS significant, but isn't addressed and WCC require less than 5 mph. MAJOR noise sources, including railroad car "wheel squeal", were omitted. Their proposed !'1"Estimates" of noise levels were used, reduction in spur length enhances this problem. including hopper car unloading. Vibration due to rail car movement and Noise from idling locomotives was addressed, unloading were not considered. This has the but not that from locomotives pulling loads. potential to cause property damage. Summary Emissions and Odors Dr. Dave Kisker, Ph.© and Margie Witch To be compatible, USR15-0027 must meet an enforceable residential noise limit at the site property line on all sides. Effects of vibration must be evaluated and mitigated. Compensation fund must be instituted. We cannot rely on MMM noise analysis go guarantee that mitigation will provide compatibility. The neighbors should not have to "police" the noise emissions. a a Key elements of emissions Stewart Emissions Assessment assessments ALLC missionatourceslinust[ eCtonsidered— NOTEDONE SeveraBourcesEiveraiottonsidered AltE mission[calculationsl hould[ibe[ IoneE sO Wrong[ roductionL apacities( sed "worstE ase"Ctonditions—NOT[DONE SomeC alculationsC vereC correct SeveralC alculationsEivere[berformed[ibutaotI All ugitive[dust[innust[iancluded—NOTWONE disclosedUnEithealipplication Incorrecthealthempactattatement Ith omplexaite[ uchC s[this,[ PA'sGAERSCREENCtnodelE1 isMot ufficient—a[completeC iteC nodelnsaequired9 12 7/24/2015 Stewart Emissions Assessment Dispersion Modeling AERSCREENC11sed,Cdlespite[inadequacy FortisphaltliblantIlliceotaised@ecommendedU 1P(]' CEFfforkliryer A►lowsltligherahardiltecessaty(LOlImission Annual) roductiortlaftitoncretelplanta?JloesfltotfigreeDvithMPEND applicationlil325,000(Hu.6'ds.asilltoo,000[itu.['A'ds.) Mathematical!' EmissionsLBortitoncrete i lanti�ased[ibnitcentrall1nix'Uunctioniltsteadlb1L] - -. estimate®tt nignerlimissionlatruc it ix"fitunctiorl® dispersiontibt© Plantlifeportedla CDPHEf3oabetitapablefabflbotl> PENT pplication - thellimission0 CementmransferlimissionaihotClone@orrectly fr - cloudlt;romlh© HourlyCltapacityy[[th flbsphaltC)blantIDtot(itorrecti 38cdphas.C oo®ph ctualgl source. Estimateatbfghollutantatoncentrationslbt©1earbytilesidenceslkIcorrectaitiuel _,r- - r. - to( metersCis.l tt"I1onfusion Foititimplaites,0 EstimateCbialtollutionibispersion@alculationslIroml oncretegblantl3vere© pperformedlibuti lotlllisclosed EPA's® 4 No@valuationCtbi6worst@aselbus►dinga111ownwashaffectsavasgberformed AERSCREENl1naye - Implies@ompletelylimknownekalidity[hftlheI1ispersion@alculations be6Jssed. EstimateCrbft ugitiveCtllustEfmom®raffrdtbnC)bavedCbndCtLnpavedlloadsCtivereEl perfo rmedlbutailtotRl isclosed Martino AariettatEreeley7ssphalUPIant,IMaya2,C&oi5 3 Example of effect of Stewart Impact of Stewart report mistakes Al FormaldehydeDispersion lli _ 'C- AsphaltTlantat0 21.1311h/m% x7.iffWm] Understatementoffl grilym3 "receptor",01 capacity,161Ns.Qn K^mr3'aszr:y :!, Formaldehyde AsphaltfPlarrt,tbe Notleeported 39.79114fm) Understatementlbl3 351i§fm3 s+ receptor,CPMa.5 capaclty,mtvs.31n (x4®dEPANAAQs) c " Concrete PlantlBil2 NoUdeported 8of 41'3 Not reported o receptor,IPMao z• :o mI Concrete plane Estimated butfihoe 6.4r)3z.4ItpY Noaeported,© E. '5 .,, �� emission,PMio reported�5.&!py incorrectIbmission u C factors " 4-0 E H H ACJ Fugitivedustelromr) Estimatedlbutfine Noeeported Actual Stewart • • REL traf caMioo reported, annual 44dtonsperf fear 500 .000 ,500 0000 0500 3000 3500 Distanceffrom3ourcegMeters) Fugitivoillustirom3 Estimatedibut noel Noffleported trafficaM2.5,l reported,6 annual ii30onsiberyear Assessment of HAP risks NIOSH REL for Formaldehyde TC r°'nsalde Recommendedl&xposuref�imit [`� •r...,..�..+.r.....r+n.MIS mos ».:. :n�: W,w....r . »`J crap 1••••••• ttrr••tl/ !»sa pies �+ ,.�,1----,,,,., e}wtwrrc•tam :.,,._, ,.. ., . Exposurelievel:[t@7frtglm3 1O.7'"1 �ertau nut. -allI m nit bins 3ttl, s3ae% =O Q22DDm _sitcom's Environmental Protection Agency 1 Exposure Limits POCKET GUIDE TO esAir Resources Board The NIOSH recommended exposure limits(RELs) are listed first in this section. For NIOSH RELs, CHEMICAL OfficerefEnvironmental0 "TWA"indicates a time-weighted average concentration for up to a 10-hour workday during a 40-hour workweek. A short-term exposure limit(STEL)is designated by"sr preceding the HAZARDS Healthl3lazardl ssessmentEl value;unless noted otherwise,the STEL is a 15-minute TWA exposure that should not be 4 (OEHHA) exceeded at any time during a workday. A ceiling REL is designated by"C"preceding the value; unless noted otherwise,the ceiling value should not be exceeded at any time. Any substance that NIOSH considers to be a potential occupational carcinogen is designated by the notation "Ca"(see Appendix A which contains a brief discussion of potential occupational carcinogens). ..u+,..,a•,u.r•.O•,..r r..crr Ca,lbw Cam„•••w,.••••. w-..C•..r•.,.,,r,•••• 13 7/24/2015 NIOSH REL Controls What about the dust? Exposure:I rig/003 LOS) SmallEParticlelDispersion,� /003 III AsphaltCplantGbnly REL=19 ? iao 70 1 •oWo i.. •nAa•5 e`° PMa.5o Levels M rtpb.nh r W,,.rrru w•oAali,a., ••••• q° h•y ••ti•,�_ ?l-r FCDcf1J'r 1, y :o y'„`L.'.�.•4^ NIOSH C :o .• 0 At concentrations above the NIOSH Nl.t.or where there h.no Ott C.at any detectable V o concentration: 0 500 :coo 1500 "03 1503 300' 3500 ADC - 10,000: Any c tl-cc cano(1 txraathaxq apparacu•rho:hag a fuel farop.w• and operacad a. Distanceltroml Sourcel4Meters) .�prrxartr Armand M ether(way..pre:tier midr 'Apr • 10,065;An• .uppleed-ar rv,pu rrtcr that ha, a cull Caceprece and n operated of a Creasy demand or other Dowrtr.e oreshie mode in combinat, n with an aunlar, aeN-contaarrd Doothe- DretSufe breathing appatatu. How much dust (PMa.5) matters? Odors EPA�tir�uality o€flli�IItjJms •— IndexlfortPM2.5 AsphaltC IantsC mitlibdors.Efilklways. 1/,I omplaintsE tITaftEI-Iilll n@o14 r� ell Q[itomplaintC veryEi. layst fi peration away IS s.,nnta rims arua. 3 f SmellssreLctually[3resent1veryftlay 9arraly.r.ft1dw Deceive h or lung People 0th a'>Itl R should ... ter tut deed* dala ►. SOON gam ane nee ' OdorsCrange[fromC nnoyingC oC nhealthy. drolm ova leen cn. r ou s.Hearta we .. . • r-r4'-a thwrlaRa.(batN.l :° '"'"retain cut pram ea°mi The0100 monde" Even here1sEioEN'iolation duelloE >@lilution0 i5o.SWI2SO.4Htj1ma =`== standard,CtheremSE nampactlIbnE ctivity. a5o.5®5ooaglma ._� sew - --� Conclusion Thell6teward eport,C ommissionedlyEIMMMO doesdoesEhotaccuratelyriteflectilheamissionsE from[ he4broposedI operation. .. Health Effects Thellonclusion[lthatIlherellvillEbelboEhealthEl of Air Pollutior effectsUls5vrong. OdorsEtelatedE1o[ heEisphaltIblantEhnustElbeEI Impact of the proposed controlledE yG�imposingllightC tandardsE�vithE] Martin FactoryMarietta Materials penaltieslfornexceedingIhose[ tandards. Dr. Eric Wingerson, D.O. 14 7/24/2015 Air Pollution Summary Factory Emissions o Air Pollution is generated by aggregate, concrete & °Hazardous Air Pollutants(HAP) asphalt distribution centers and factories and transportation of these products. , °Particulates from asphalt and concrete plants & diesel exhaust I- F Air Pollution causes and worsens lung, heart & brain �^>;<'' diseases. g z; °Fugitive dust from roads, aggregate L. �S handling, loading/unloading & ' .:.a processing - more particulates n MMM's heavy industrial factory is incompatible with £m I local human populations. xt4� oMost importantly small particles 3 _ _ : o P M 10 r}�,} ') The Health Impact study was only based on the �._� ":.tw= asphalt batch plant and not the concrete and z ` oPM2.5 A. aggregate distribution component of the facility pan rail s Answers to Asphalt Plant Related . •..•'. �.„w Health Questions CA Office of Environmental Health r'� E Prepared by Scott Phiupa.At0.. FRCP.FACME,FAACT 8 • `.- Hazard Assessment (CA OEHHA) vzz r o Based on flawed Stewart Environmental r 1.1 Formaldehyde Awls REL 4 report ' RMreroe Ecvoaure um* as Mae lM Pal © Focused only on asphalt plant ` °`"'"` .e EelmIMO end °°""°"° �'°° s p >/,�,: y; tine MS.a.q.au Eel man a - 12 Fermatd hyde 0-Hour REL 27 rglrn3 o No consideration of fugitive dust ty• Reentoe ewlove 9Ant ir— O _ber cry*Me Neal oON ,tt ne a deca_ t WOW army o Relies entirely on CDPHE limits - Nand nee aaryaat Reentrynone anon* ""°bn x 1.3 Faatdohyde Chasmic REL °Neglects PM2.5 entirely "�` rm otors&Anew Lome 9 sere a OM eeeeat aeam(a) Nue oaai.ueoon aria a aoawon ww Wall aante,aria eye neon • Places nem toemf al Raaonwey am_ • -r.4 - - ---_-----—--:-. 1.----74------- So what' s the harm in a little Microscopic - not visible - it enters your home. drsaust? O — i. �.. ?:� . 6 P542 5 r • © Dust is it Cannon pada HUMAN HAIR �'� p • _rtiulateH. tee ti' : rgs Matter43/42 a (PM) in, t _et pram w f� n a:A a 117 Ill ?;::r • ...c., cy till 1 Lib, I r.411 �� S <.13; A7` L. J s S :T I wY . — 90 Pin 0eaa.enar S 'W-- - - . FINE BEACH SAND• -- • am..SSW IMO u a WI ' '.... ar x • . JO. ,.S ,"WVA ? 15 7/24/2015 1M - . v Small PM effects Physiology c oPM 2.5 and smaller pass through the 4 CESS e,-� lung -blood lining and create irritation , "` i°ir °a or inflammation that turns on the 2 3.'1" „„vi Small particles are �", '_ ii reed Mei immune system and can create or »> not captured by «_,10ke IMO10 ` Use Om%me A .�_ Ream - 'm the body's ~OP lodb �--+. MOW il worsen hardening of the arteries, heart tM defenses. MIS `all / P. ► linallsf1 attack, stroke and lung diseases & t.Sea Os �� ` - They can penetrate , NEV: :i21 deep into the lungs, ' caL. € .�{: cancer. ro p ,�„ , and the tlnlS...1000I.-00.-.- tµs. -..t..........IL ,; bloodstream. This is short and long term exposure risk. il=a-- , - 0000 0000 - I WHO - Health Effects of PM WHO - Health Effects of PM o PM 10 and PM2.5 cause both short term o An increase in PM 10 by 10 1 ig/m3 is (hours, days) and long term (months, estimated to increase all-cause years)risks ; daily mortality by 0.2-0.6% o respiratory and cardiovascular disease o Long-term exposure to a PM2.5 o aggravation of asthma and respiratory symptoms increase of 10 Tlg/m3 is associated a increase in hospital admissions with an increase in the long-term risk oMortcility {,.i of cardiopulmonary mortality by 6- o cardiovascular and respiratory diseases 13% o lung cancer. Source: 2013 WHO Report:"Health Effects of Particulate Molter" ,iii; Source: 2013 WHO Report"Health Effects of Particulate Matter" ,; N. :,._... . t .. .; 10; %.z ''fe 1 t-, . 1010 , ` is < 1010 . ,,r .> 1010 _. 10• '1010 1010. 10 _10 > ^e,...9 .S. lY ` .ii- WHO - Health Effects of PM l _: o Susceptible groups j How much PM2 .5 matters? Ph o lung or heart disease F'.W I: o elderly people •I o children wow X01-,,r,.Y.. "I'd ;s 5. 4. dear Xi oK ber arrow r .„ut:rr,-.me. o— [X676 at Oa ac w—i— vts:t < .\.-t r vv x '' ayrttpk.aa LXit al tOttirrJ I. .r. 'IT i-..•.r_'el. '.,> _ ��. o There is no evidence of a safe level of exposure or a i a kw won't ban'� PottatIn�Vdaimdlay : atseas� anet aorta Eta coons arts ,- .. .•ye >: ;. threshold below which no adverse health effects occur. lot'"° maim andreelape> •#s ' O ytlY NON oat dad t y : Cr rt'3,si tralallltatca . r ii. ,c w5': 3g�%, MS caudal ytw • u Sensitive populations must take precautions' Source: 2:113 WHO Repot'. "Health Elects of Por'iculale Matter" �6 ''.:.55V2;:;5- s ka . , 1010...,_,. 1010..-, .,: , .,.0<>J?.is .e;..�. .... < .h. Y';... _le 1010. J; <aeu.< a .i: 10:10. 1010.:; �'.. 1010 > > 1010 1010 1010 . 10 10 .?,f.1 ><,'�.5 E. 1010.. 1010 16 7/24/2015 WHO -total disease burden Conclusions Air Pollution is generated by aggregate, concrete & oWHO estimates of total disease burden asphalt distribution centers and factories and transportation of these products. attributable to PM: O Air Pollution causes and worsens lung, heart & brain diseases. 03% of cardiopulmonary deaths , MMM's heavy industrial factory is incompatible with .5% of lung cancer deaths local human populations. The Health Impact study was only based on the asphalt batch plant and not the concrete and -* oA 2010 study estimates PM2.5 aggregate distribution component of the facility. accounted for 3. 1 million deaths. Visual Impact and Landscape IA MM Visual Impact Report Plan K , r •`..n • r Dave Kisker and John Wallace ®,, 'liti : • LocationDA ' LocationiB nie in . IMMINNESMIMI Actual Visual Effects Wallace Home. . . 1 r / Visual[iimpactl asedl nD D' actual,@cale[Ootos[bf - _ - -�` - thelbei hborhood i� - _ - • - / - - -ai tom_.a t. lz--- • _"-----s - - - - - _ .---r- -- Ili 411, 4144111411 17 7/24/2015 Meusch Home Effect of Elevation The[plan[floes[ otC ddresslthe[factEthat( nuchabfl he0 surrounding[ reaglsC tflaubstantiallvalioher( levationn i "V ! I t r �7. * t • _ Ii Seriously?? • • Report by Michael Smith for MMM Property values is not credible Or. Eller Risirtr, Ph.D. Prot. Diane Hite,Aunum University Paired@alesa nalysislkafflawedC pproach Comparisor@alesElhandlIbickeda ot@tatistically0 MMMLHASEPROVIDED[NOIEREDIBLEIASSURANCELTHATh matched NEIGHBORINGIPROPERTY1WILLINOT1OSE[3UBSTANT1ALEI ResultsEbiaseManalysisililoesgmaccoundorathee VALUE differencesEbetween[Iouses) Report by Michael Smith for MMM Conclusion of no effect on house is not credible values is not credible EconomistsElmelbedoniqbricentriodelsE Hedonic[ ricellnodeld onsistentlylthow0 negative effects lisamenities1 nl ouseNalues Includall@alesNna lefinedC eographic[ read] Gravel[{bitC hownEtto[have[ ubstantialfiegative[ieffectO during@tudy[ eriod (zoo Reduction[ or{housesf f alfl nile[≥liway) Account[iorli theri-nportant,[ionfoundingNIactors Landfills[ howni ofihavef ubstantialf egativef itect1 (180 Rompared[tiodhousesatipproximatelyWiles9 Examine[ ffecafflilistance[ rom[ he[ilisamenityA away) all[ ther@hingsfbeingf qual Transportation[ ►oise@howndic avelegativef?f!ffectO (wag CforaIncreasef rom[tsdBftof 5dB) Railroad(racks@hownEllo[haveMegatrve[ ffect[ 1oa withinfaooEBneters) Information[ boutftearbyfliisamenitiesiplaysf mole 18 7/24/2015 Report by Michael Smith for MMM is not credible Incompatibility Crediblellxperts[find[ ubstantialgiegative effects0 CommonEkenseC ndiiteraturer substantiallossesingbropertyNtaluerfor0 111.111111 neighbors n General Compatibility Effects of incompatibility TheanpactC3bfl oise,abdors,C i4ollution,Etraffic,o CauseaconomicAphysicalandEtocialPldrainsT property[ alueMosses,i?: ndltherC ffectslbfllinEl onlheilommunity industriaactivityasElikelyaolitauselnacceptableE 11 l.v, ,L tJ YYI IIb111JIVVVIIAIJI�.l.i V11 LI�V VJL..1 IlItA IIJV�.11tAVIV 1IJ Creates[barriersiloEihew[nvestment1 ndEI changestthalearbylitesidents.11 Lossibequietf njoyment"dffheirflbroperty discouragesf xistingdlandC�bwners[ rom0 investinglllnOlheirl:broperties ACtompatiblelibperationC7vould[blot requireli ehaviorD changes[tromllheE eighbors. CreatesaRirainanEtheNitalitylbfrilhe0 communityGisativhole m Land use compatibility matrix Windsor and Greeley Agree! • f omsi r Wass edas0dustrial® Therr��,,ro osed[ atch j sic lantUnETntensiveE dustrialiibseE formsC�Brei�lassified[�s0 `f" P � � ' singlerablet eighbormen unsuitedE orf1heF haturegAthisillorridor,I ndCitsE1mpacts0 ""SNOW """""` residentia9 ndCtises,fa�speciallyifl likely[�tannotlbeffullyllniti9ated.[ 'urthermore,C;ltpproval0 1 sin IelHamil evelo ment.© ofl#hisC lse[ ecialERevlew Cns ro osed dvoulddlkel g � p y[≥Sp p Y0 } # establish prawlingCindEiwerly ntenseliand5Inel2l .- -- Thet'ariouswharacteristicsabfta pattern['for[#uturet development b he11orridor. "`O ""' industrialalevelopment1 re© ....0~4 camas _� generanytihoearmoniousEivith0 ...With[ herbroposedl caleC nddocation,C hisCpeoposal0 IN theatmosphereaoughtfin® may[irustrate[that1 ision,R•rC +ttieastlirontributeC oEthe0 , residentialI reas .�.�. .. beginningstbUtElandC selpattern@vith1tignificantflmpacts0 ran o tollheajatewayflnto[thelitygbfaGreeleyGhndErownCtbfe +-�•» GJC7F7G7n Windsor."ram }windsortReferralcLetter] e CZ7 .....,...r. e e e • 19 7/24/2015 Johnstown is also on board! RAMM's interpretation DespitellheC1learI ntentionsf xpressedIi yihe] WHEREAS,the proposed facility wound negatively impact the rearby ladianhcad residential subdivision by exposing the tomes to axttinuous industrial operations, forcing than surroun dingl10mmunities,II4MMI ersistsRnEl to coexist with large,othawisc unplanned,industrial development and ruling potential losses theirl laimft f t ompatibility: of property value,quiet a njomnant and quality of life;and WHEREAS,on a broader scale,the Town envision growth along the U.S. Highway 34 "Therefore,Milartiritilarietta'stilisefibjitherpropertylits0 corridor to include commercial,residential and mixed use development consistent and CO Oser C)( ineQVith�hedl0n an lan of he0 harmonious with the current development;and P p g WHEREAS.the proposed facility is not only inconsistent with the Town's vision of the area. " growth along the U.S. Highway 34,but has considerable potential to lead to an expanded and unplanned heavy industrial presence along the U.S.Highway 34 corridor,and Weld County% perspective on intent Greeley's Comp Plan says it best of the industrial zone district IndustrialIancC1UseCEharacteristics TheCtburposeRbf[ heindustrial[ onemistrictsEtEl "...111ndustrial5seAncludeginanufacturing,Pliabrication,0 Tolibrovide4tirotectiveffronesliorahenDEVELOPMENTandITI operationribfthtdustrialltJSES...® processing,f ndlllistribution[lises.nesellisesC sell ToCeducelloalininimumEthe©mpactaflIndustriesEand typicallyaotCdompatiblelvvith[ nnanyI therI surroundingjTonindustrialgland3.JSESO usesEibecausellbillhellImpactslitheyllanatreate,0 Togbrevenaletrimentalr rnpacts5vhichlhayghegativelyaffectalhe0 includingEhoise,mightingAibrationj ndE futurerfJJSE[brWEVELOPMENTLW DJACENTI ropertiesCibriihe0 generalENEIGHBORHOOD❑ ;Ei odor." . "WhileMomeElbwartensitAndustrialMsesatanaben anda..[lor4bromoteftheCstealth,( afetyCandC3jeneral3velfaren designed[ ofleikompatibleNvith@esidential[J reas,...0 ofiiheClbresentCend[future@esidents5i{ heMOUNTY.0 heavierCthdustriaiE bses[i1 suallytlannot[1efnade0 compatible and[ire[ estdlocatethvithindlargee HEAVYDNDUSTRYEBELONGSONCANONDUSTRIALO industrialt&oned[ reas."0 ZONE!!! The cost of incompatibility Weld County Code Compliance Criteria for approval of USR InappropriatemanclabsesC hould[ eC iewedasatE poor[Choiceara nnisuse[ flahel ounty'smandEl surface. tiurrsrsterrltJVru OMIT LIAR rlyatl.urrlprerlerlstvetI'rdrl NOt- Consistent ithUintentIlf1'gricultural District NO! InappropriatedandaisesCiepresentdosta opportunities. Conservationrtbftll'RIME[Sarmland NO! ThisE 1neanslihatE pportunitiesE r[ibotential[ior0 Compatibfec vith(lFdlaster[ IansCtbft�ffectedIommunities NO! beneficialftelationshipsfmayUtlotE 1naterializell Compatiblet vithgExistingUUsesafsurrounding❑ NO! because[the[ ulli notentialf vasaotC ecognized. Neighborhoods Protectionaniealth,i5afety and@Velfarel rititountyL7 NO! Residents 20 7/24/2015 MMM Community "engagement" Other Concerns Januaryf 7th,[ o15—Public[J1Jleeting DidQstudies";11oncludeceDon't[ vorry,[ e[llappy.® Goodllleighbors" ApplicationNubmittethivith[ o@ignificant@hanges Junelagiois—meeting5vitnEELRE134ffieps RailCtnod,[ nnouncedQLandscape[tharrette",m Committee Noather[ ignificantEEhanges JuneL ,[lo15—PublicNneeting NolSignificantl Changes Refused[ideas[ or1mprovement( noise,abdors,0 emissions) E Community Engagement... ? Good neighbor behavior: 88o Letters! mitigation claims source.bflettersEtoiWeldItounty >600rlorm1BettersgfromE Odor Verticalfisphaltb4anks Already plannedln!Ftitollins 'S° MMMIlmployees??) Charcoaltfilter Possible improvement Noise Mitigationsalidt3tudy Unenforceable,1Ylogesidentiall3tandards o NotllmlK written"Eby 1 ]CIIUCI Moveaheilail loop Improvement form-IE$ameleavorseaoic thers E 'se Traffic Installilight indianea Entirelylorthenefit®ftMMM;doesthotssolva Many&pposedEl improvements problem;tKelimQtilfalnctrouble •Suppon c a <ontractorsd Visual®mpact Berms,llandscapeE Essentiallyl3lo@ffect dotnotCbppearto[beEl charrette IicensedQnaO Dusand] Didfb study 5uppressed6vorstOproblems,Gappearl!olbai@ 50 Pollution violation ofINAAO5 Healthtffects DidlWMudy Noaffect 0.5 I 2 S '° 'S oo as so too Mon Propertyt&alue Did{atudy No@ffect OlstsncdhootStte Compliance ForrnI31t ommittee NoI ffect,tho nforcement power One other site exists (maybe) A@earchl bfC ver115EIMMMITaiImasedC itesEfindslyr1 thatlteemsmike(thisEbne[ SanlAntonio) • 75ITites[:have[iail CI, . . ,.O. its an expenrnent! io[1lave[ sphalt z5[tlave[ftoncrete One@eemsIio[slave[ ggregate,C sphaltl ndl oncrete NONE[3lvveredn plementedAFTER[ilearby0 neighborhoods0 21 7/24/2015 It's Risky! It's unmitigated! Traffic—MMNILdidautudyjilleclaredethatf t'sibotttheiOroblemMEDOTDvillIb L7 MaybethereNvill[beacilhealthaffecalueLtolithen it particulateE ndE Ormaidehydei missions Noise—MMMOid[ @tudy,aleclaredliit's[ otalheirproblem,DhoCenforcement[I Maybellhe@urrounding[ armsL3�Vvon'ttJhe( mpacted possible;Eweldadtounty@esponsible. MaybeRhereNvon'tabailisruptiveDhoise Emissionslindffnealth—MMMaditOtudy,[itleclaredEt's[ihot[theirfibroblem.® '.i..y v..Ldi ,.. .. ..'.� . ... �...�....0 v�..L�.u..� ., CDPHERiesponsible. Maybeltherellivvon't[ieE n iresl] Odor—MMMIleclared[ 'si otitheir*roblem;IDPHEf esponsible. Maybe( heL3idditionalltra id3lvon'tlbealbroblem Visualthmpact—MMMC id[i@tudy.®eclaresnit'sClhotttheidibroblem.rageighbors0 MaybelthetibropertyNalues(won't[ elhegativelyl] mustigiat.° effected Property[D'alues—MMM[;'didCk@tudy,l�leclared[tt'salota roblem CommunitylNision—MMMrdleclaresllheya rel ompatibleavithihea Maybe( heNision[for0ohnstown,LNindsorlIndO communities'L 'ision. GreeleAvon'tilbeffimpeded BUTEIhesellimmitigatedC3lssuesDAREl1heirtIbroblem.® (% BUTprobably,Lome/allilbfttheselihingsaVILLCtbccur Withouffiheirt ctivities,L hese[ibroblemsi vould0 notI xist!! It's uncompensated! Community Costs MMMIdoesrtiotilbfferilknyilompensationEilonlhell MMMIllaimsC Qcommunityi enefit"E fa32M0 NEIGHBORHOODS,DeIommunities! r[TheIounty0 overllhef3fiexlfloBkears.[E&Iowever,C3bo0 to[ ccept[iIhisLIisk.® No[ ignificanti ales( ax1 evenues considerationOsL ivenl oEhelIosts: IVIII 11111011461 u1JCI 141301UCE ICVCI Minima lgobslIBankCtbflilolorado[ uildingEJiasanore) Trafficfftnpacts NoaictimsgtompensationdundsEforEihealth,garm,Ilbroperty0 Loss(bfCfbropertyClaxClueI1otlecliningEbropertyI 'alues valuegbetherlitlamage Nof ddedC�Yalue[ oCt}ommunitiesl o[ ffset[�osses Lossf�bfibewC�tommercial[andllesidentialfllevelopmentl] NoEamenitiesliollbffset1 1isamenitiesEJ in[ hef rea Loss ft rowthapportunitiesf lue[ o[jrowingLI TheEONLY vinnerEisNMM! businesses Summary MartinlAariettal/laterialsliasENOM demonstratedChat[ his[ .JSRCthoulde0 recommendedC orI pproval lll./E./III.QIIVI I�QII.J IaiEyI IVI tl LiI 1JC111yL 7LILVI I IE.JIC lCO descriptionilbfI vhat lsE1blanned Let'sC voidllhisatisky,Cldncompensated0 experiment Recommend®ENIAL( ollheNVeldEtounty0 Commission! 22 r� arr L1 ' EXHIBIT 7 -10(35- it • • L t\I Video from CLR-34 1 nn -1 0 0 0 0 Co 0 o o � c: 10 car, c01 01 ca, car, a a a = c r, ao 00 -� ti �+ 0 rn nn -n al .AA w -1 o .A w o �a CO p r' Z -� ca o0 0 w 01 0 01 0 CA 0 01 0 cJi O Cr> o cn o cry o N M ?� rn LI cn cn R ..-, p . 6) co O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q CD CD —� O O CD -- r re w (-) K 0 a� O � 1 ~_ W elp a" --- CO O N 0 O o 00 o s4.1 r C 01 W ~ D' a O 1D 0 0 20 • hi 9 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 jy --II O O O -a 0 0 0 -1, C) CA ET r , , + I � , r I I0 0 r FIT o .m.4,. S 0 o V) Oa , . = a CO 0 0 CD -s 0 0 Ni 0 N 0 a CD 0 x 0 0 0 Z7 • • , 4 1 p- .- . I . CO C 0 W co o 0 0 --a. 0 0 tV 0 60 r )1 N O 0 0 --2, O O o O0 70.10 = C / C/' O a II ? 0 co Q O o -1. 0 O N 0 CO 0 -s. 0 -a - 0 0 -a co a; O su _ M a w 0000N0 -1- 0 -a -1• 000 -s000r .— , 0 N o O� cr 0 -s a000 -� 000 -* oo -). 000 � o23 • - C C7 a M20 tu �, i i . . P. cI w is a o00ow0ao N o -� o -� o o W c) r E = rnC Q 0 0 r c2 Q cn O..-+ N. Q a N 0 O N Oe. 0 z O = Cl)0 0 AO • r v+ m 73 -4 0 a to o O O O 0 0 o 0 0 d 0 0 0 0 O 0 a Er CI c 20 C) . . = tobbSer co 71 y a ,] o O 0 .73 a O O o 0 W 0 s 0 N a 0 a o a Oa O .cp >n< - - u, 77 OD 6 _ g. ^...1 Q Q (] �a W Q W 0 _ i j i N a _.a Q 03 . 1 co N Frontage Road 1/3 —� 1/1 --)f M U LEGEND: AM/PM Peak Hour EXHIBIT 2 0 0 11 CURRENT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC EXHIBIT SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT I 100% !/. ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW 6. uNTY Planner: Diana Aungst Hearing Date: July 21 , 2015 Case Number: USR15-0027Applicant: Weld LV LLC & Gerrard Investments LLC, c/o Martin Marietta Request: An Amendment to a Site Specific Development Plan and Use by Special Review Permit No. USR-1584 for any use permitted as a Use by Right, an Accessory Use, or a Use by Special Review in the Commercial or Industrial Zone Districts (construction business with two shop buildings, office buildings, and outdoor storage) provided that the property is not a lot in an approved or recorded subdivision plat or lots parts of a map or plan filed prior to adoption of any regulations controlling subdivisions to include a Mineral Resource Development Facility including asphalt & concrete batch plants (materials processing) and transloading in the A (Agricultural) Zone Legal Lot B of Recorded Exemption RE-2803 being part of the SW4 and SE4; and a Description: tract being part of the SW4, all in Section 18, T5N, R67W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, CO Location: East of and adjacent to County Road 13; approximately one-half mile south of U .S. Highway 34. Size of Parcel: +/- 131 .42 acres Parcel Nos. 0957-18-0-00- 009 0957-18-3-00- 044 Case Summary: The applicant, Martin Marietta, is requesting an approval of a Special Use Permit for an asphalt batch plant, a Ready Mix Concrete batch plant, a 7,2006,413 foot rail loop spur that will accommodate up to 121-117 train cars for transloading, and materials processing including recycling and wholesale & retail sales of aggregate. This USR request is also for the continued operation of Gerrard Construction as approved under USR-1584 for a period of one year following approval of USR15-0027. USR- 1584 was approved for 40 employees and hours of operation were 6:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Monday - Saturday. The application materials for this USR indicate that the number of full-time employees for Gerrard Construction will be 36 during the year that they are operating. and for At full build-out . Martin Marietta anticipates that they will be have 71 for a total of 107 full-time employees. There-Martin Marietta wiThalso be projects that they will have up to 45 truck drivers and 25 field construction workers who will be based out of this facility and will be off-site most of the time. The hours of operation for Gerrard Construction will be 6:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. Monday - Friday and 7:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. on Saturday. The number of employees and the hours of operation are consistent with the original USR-1584. Martin Marietta operations: Martin Marietta's hours of operation are 24 hours a day / 7 days a week; however, they have offered to operate under the following restrictions:: Hours of Operation for Asphalt: o The plant will typically only operate Monday through Saturday o The standard hours of plant operation will be limited to being between one hour before sunrise and one hour after sunset. o Load out from storage silos will be limited to being between one hour before sunrise and USR15-0027 - Martin Marietta Page 1 of 20 one hour after sunset. o When the plant is operating at night, it will only occur when material is requested by cities, counties or CDOT for night paving projects. Operations will be considered "night operations" when they take place between the hours of one hour after sundown to one hour before sunrise. Depending on the request of the jurisdiction purchasing the asphalt, night operations could occur seven days per week. o When Martin Marietta becomes aware of projects that require night operations, they will email the Weld County Planning Director to let him/her know about the plans to operate outside of daylight hours, who the project is for, how long it will be occurring , and where the materials are being delivered. Hours of Operation for Ready Mix Concrete: o The Ready Mix Concrete Plant will only operate Monday through Saturday. o Actual operating hours of the Ready Mix Concrete Plant will vary depending on weather and business levels. The plant will generally not begin operating until daylight. Occasionally, it may need to operate earlier to accommodate daily business demands; however, in no instance will the plant ever operate before 3:00 a.m . o The plant will not operate more than 16 hours per day. o Ready Mix trucks will generally operate during plant operations, but may return to the plant after plant shutdown to be cleaned and parked . Hours of Operation for Aggregate and Recycling: o Aggregate sales and recycling operations will only occur Monday through Saturday. o Aggregate washing and recycling operations will only occur during daylight hours (dawn to dusk or 6:30 a.m . to 6:00 p.m . during the winter), actual operating hours will vary dependent on weather, and business levels. o Train unloading operations during the summer will only take place between the hours of 6:00 a.m . and 8:00 p.m. , actual hours will be dependent on the time the train arrives at the site. o Train unloading operations during the winter will only take place during daylight hours, actual hours will be dependent on the time the train arrives at the site. Asphalt plant: The asphalt plant will utilize sand , gravel, and rock in conjunction with recycled asphalt and various additives to produce bituminous asphalt for utilization on various road and construction projects. The asphalt plant will be powered by natural gas. As part of the asphalt plant portion of the facility, asphalt cement will be transported to the site and stored in tanks to be utilized in the process of making asphalt. The asphalt produced will be trucked offsite for use by the local market. The asphalt plant and related equipment will be 100 feet in height. Ready Mix Concrete plant: A Ready Mix Concrete plant will use sand , gravel, rock, cement, and various additives to produce concrete that will be trucked off-site for use on various construction projects. The Ready Mix Concrete plant and related equipment will be 110 feet in height. Transloading Martin Marietta will construct a rail loop spur which will accommodate up to 121 117 train cars off the existing Union Pacific Railroad line for the unloading (transloading) of aggregates,-and Aesphalt cement may also be brought to the site on a train . Aggregates will arrive by train up to three times per week and will be unloaded and prepared for sale or used by the Ready Mix Concrete plant and asphalt plant. Crushing/screening of recycled materials: A recycled materials processing plant will crush and sort recyclable materials including , but not limited to, concrete and asphalt. The recyclable materials are byproducts of existing processes and/or material that will be brought onsite from local construction projects. The recycling plant is portable so it may be moved around the property from time to time. L'J USR15-0027 - Martin Marietta Page 2 of 20 A portable wash plant for washing, screening, sorting , stockpiling, unloading, and loading of sand, gravel, rock, crushed stone, recycled materials, overburden , clay, and topsoil type products. Sales of aggregate and recycled materials: Up to 680,000 cubic yards of aggregate and recycled asphalt and concrete will be stored on the site in separate piles. Parking and Lighting: The application materials show adequate parking for both the existing and the proposed uses. There is an existing fence and gate along County Road 13 that was installed for Gerrard Construction that will continue to be used. New buildings: • Asphalt plant - 100 feet in height • Ready Mix Concrete plant - 110 feet in height • 14,400 square foot - office building • 1 ,200 square feet - modular dispatch trailer • 14,500 square feet - maintenance building • 4,800 square feet -scale house • 1 ,800 square feet - asphalt trailer • Fueling station • Wash plant • Truck wash • Recycled materials processing equipment • Conex buildings • Maintenance sheds • Electrical substation - Power will be delivered to the site at 14.4 kV and Martin Marietta will transform it down at a 7.5 MVA substation proposed at the facility for internal distribution . • 3 vertical asphalt cement tanks - 10-15 feet in diameter and 40-45 feet in height (30,000 gallons each) • 1 vertical emulsified asphalt tank - 10-15 feet in diameter and 40-45 feet in height (24,000 gallons) • 2 large capacity Asphalt Cement (AC) storage tanks — 100 feet in diameter and 45 feet tall (2.2 million gallons each) Screening: As approved under USR-1584 Gerrard Construction has installed some evergreen trees along County Road 13 at the entrance to the facility. Some of the trees will need to be removed to make space for the secondary emergency access road required by the fire protection district. Martin Marietta will install a landscape buffer/berm along the eastern edge of the property between the rail loop spur and the adjacent residential subdivision (Indianhead Subdivision). The berm will be 11 feet in height on the north end and 24 feet in height on the south end . The variation in height is required because of the topography of the site. Additional landscaping will also be provided around the perimeter of the project consistent with the landscape plan . Traffic: Beginning in 2017 it is estimated that the facility will generate approximately 1 , 120 daily site trips and that by 2035 Tthere will be up to approximately 2,260 daily site trips. The traffic impact study states that 95% of the daily site trips will travel north towards U .S. Highway 34. L'J USR15-0027 - Martin Marietta Page 3 of 20 Trucks will haul in specific aggregate products to the site to complete the concrete and asphalt mix. These same trucks may be re-loaded with on-site aggregate and deliver to customers. Access: The primary access is an existing access point on County Road 13 and is currently being used by Gerrard Construction. All traffic entering and exiting the site will use the new bridge that will be installed over the train. Since a train will be on the rail loop spur a-great deal of the tinneintermittently, this bridge is required to allow access into the interior portion of the rail loop spur at all times. u A 20 foot wide secondary emergency access off of County Road 13 will be constructed just north of where the Union Pacific Railroad tracks cross County Road 13. Another In addition , a 20 foot wide, at-grade, secondary emergency access will be constructed at the north end of property this will be a 20 foot wide at-grade crossing of thoover the rail loop spur, as required by the Front Range Fire District Authority. This at-grade crossing will allow access for emergency vehicles when if the bridge is not accessible during an emergency. The applicant has had two neighborhood meetings one in January 2015 and one in June 2015: in addition, they met with adjacent neighbors in June 2015 to discuss landscaping. DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES' STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THIS REQUEST BE DENIED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1 . The submitted materials are in compliance with the application requirements of Section 23-2- 260 of the Weld County Code. We are in agreement with this statement. 2. Section 23-2-220.A. 1 -- The proposed use is not consistent with Chapter 22 and any other applicable code provisions or ordinance in effect. A. Section 22-2-20. G. 1. - A.Policy 7. 1. states, "County land use regulations should support commercial and industrial uses that are directly related to, or dependent upon, agriculture, to locate within the agricultural areas, when the impact to surrounding properties is minimal , or can be mitigated, and where adequate services are currently available or reasonably obtainable." Martin Marietta is proposing to locate on two parcels; the parcel to the east is currently productive agricultural land. The soil designation on both these properties is "Prime (Irrigated)" per the 1979 Soil Conservation Service Important Farmlands of Weld County Map. The proposed USR does not directly relate to nor is it dependent upon agriculture and it will be removing about 90 acres of Prime (Irrigated) Farmland from production. Greeley, Windsor and Johnstown have all indicated that their comprehensive plans call for different land uses on this piece of property. Therefore, it is an accepted fact that this property will develop and will not remain in agricultural use. The western portion of the property was already approved for development by Weld County and is being used by Gerrard . Additionally as with all land uses, there may be impacts to surrounding properties from the proposed use. The noise generated by the train is exempt from regulations and may interfere with the neighbor's ability to have peaceful enjoyment of their property. The odors from the facility are expected to meet federal, state and local odor regulations. However, odor is subjective and has the potential to be an annoyance to the nearby residential properties. The sound study that Martin Marietta had AECOM prepare took railroad noise into consideration. According to the study, even if rail noise is exempt, Martin Marietta will still meet the noise regulations. The asphalt plant will be a state of the art plant with an emission capture system, carbon filters and vertical AC tanks. All of these investments in the plant are designed to control odor. L'] USR15-0027 - Martin Marietta Page 4 of 20 Section 22-2-20. G. 2. - A. Policy 7. 2. states, "Conversion of agricultural land to nonurban residential, commercial and industrial uses should be accommodated when the subject site is in an area that can support such development, and should attempt to be compatible with the region." Water as well as access to the railroads and arterial streets and highways are available in this area to support the proposed development. As indicated in the application, Martin Marietta has taken many steps to be compatible with the region. The proposed land use is necessary to support the economic future of the region and after an extensive search of potential sites, Martin Marietta determined that this is the most appropriate site to accommodate the use. The site is located within the three (3) mile referral area of the Towns of Windsor and Johnstown and the Cities of Greeley and Loveland. The site is also located within the three (3) mile referral area of Larimer County. Since the site is adjacent to Weld County Road 13/Larimer County Road 1 both counties provided comments on the traffic and road impact. All of the affected jurisdictions submitted referral agency comments and most of the comments indicate that the proposed Martin Marietta project is incompatible with the area, the region , and the vision for the future for this gateway to Weld County. The Town of Johnstown submitted referral agency comments dated June 15, 2015, in the form of Resolution #2015-07 opposing Martin Marietta's application. The Resolution states, in part: ". . .that if this use is permitted it would create undesirable, offensive and harmful consequences, inconsistent with the Town of Johnstown's long-range planning and inconsistent with the best growth and development along the U .S. Highway 34 corridor." The landowners were not consulted when Johnstown worked on its long-range planning . Johnstown has allowed and has plans for future industrial development in the area, west of WCR13. In addition , Johnstown's Town Board made claims and decisions about the application without knowing all of the facts about the project. Martin Marietta reached out to the Town Council to talk to them about the application and the Council made it clear that they did not want to hear from Martin Marietta. The property is located in Weld County, not Johnstown and Johnstown made the decision to not enter into an IGA with Weld County. Weld County can consider input from Johnstown; however, ultimately, Weld County needs to make decisions that are in the best interests of the County as a region . The Town of Windsor and the City of Greeley submitted referral agency comments both dated May 27, 2015, which state that this development is inconsistent with the existing 2008 Windsor/Greeley Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA). Both municipalities in their referral comments state, in part: ". . .the property is located within a sensitive location with various competing interests. It is important to consider — and, ideally, master plan this area in a collaborative manner due to the proximity of this site to three municipalities, an established unincorporated neighborhood, large swaths of productive agricultural land , and major regional transportation systems. In 2008, the Town of Windsor and City of Greeley entered into an amended Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA), that identified a defined Cooperative Planning, Land Use and Utility Area (CLUA) as a means to attempt to identify and support a land use pattern for the U .S. Highway 34 corridor that would be consistent with the jurisdictions' visions and infrastructure planned and existing in the area. The CLUA outlines permitted uses and site design characteristics within the Principal Employment Corridor and Secondary Corridor Area. The proposed facility for Martin Marietta is located within this Secondary Corridor Area. The proposed use is incompatible with this particular vision that the Town of Windsor and City of Greeley have developed for this area. The proposed batch plant is an intensive industrial use unsuited for the nature of this corridor, and its L'J USR15-0027 - Martin Marietta Page 5 of 20 impacts likely cannot be fully mitigated . Furthermore, approval of this Use by Special Review, as proposed, would likely establish a sprawling and overly- intense land use pattern for future development of the corridor. The Town of Windsor and the City of Greeley urge careful consideration for the proposed uses and its regional impact, particularly concerning future land use patterns for the area and along Highway 34. You are aware of the decades of discussion about preserving the unique identities of the Northern Colorado communities, with community buffers that allow cities and towns to maintain their character and thereby contributing to a larger regional economy. With the proposed scale and location, this proposal may frustrate that vision, or at least contribute to the beginnings of a land use pattern with significant impacts to the gateway into the City of Greeley and Town of Windsor." Once again , it makes sense to consider the input of Greeley and Windsor; however, neither community has an IGA with Weld County and, ultimately, it is up to Weld County to make decisions that are in the best interests of Weld County as a region . Both Greeley and Windsor indicated that if the application were to be approved , impacts from lights should be considered and additional landscaping should be added. Martin Marietta has fulfilled both requests. In addition, the City of Greeley City Council wrote a letter dated June 26, 2015 which states: "Since staff's comments, City Council has been briefed on the project as well as the related Greeley Comprehensive Plan and IGAs. The City Council acknowledges the County's jurisdiction in this matter, recognizing that you will be reviewing and evaluating issues related to design, impacts, and mitigation. Furthermore, it is important to acknowledge the importance of aggregate providers and their ability to provide asphalt and concrete for the future. The City Council recognizes that locating facilities somewhere in Northern Colorado will be important in supporting future economic growth in the area as local gravel resources become less available, even as new development needs additional concrete and asphalt supplies. Rail and major road corridors will be important in supporting such efforts. " The Larimer County Board of County Commissioners submitted referral agency comments dated June 16, 2015 that state: "Based upon the attached letters [please see the PC Exhibits and the referral from Larimer County] and discussions with our staff, the proposed use represents a significant change to the area with regards to traffic, noise, dust and odors, to mention a few. While this area of our County is comprised of a variety of agricultural, rural residential and non-residential uses, compatibility of land uses should still be at the heart of consideration when making a determination of the appropriateness of the proposed use and the mitigation of potential impacts. We understand that decisions on land use such as this are difficult, especially in areas experiencing significant growth , and would therefore respectfully ask that you consider the concerns raised by property owners in the attached letters." Larimer County has allowed multiple industrial uses to be developed west of WCR 13 within their jurisdiction . They do indicate in their letter that compatibility needs to be considered in making a determination. Martin Marietta has taken many steps to address compatibility issues. The application was sent to five jurisdictions to review. All five jurisdictions provided a response with the majority stating that the proposed use is incompatible with the surrounding land use and the area. The placement of a heavy industrial use, such as Martin Marietta is proposing , is a disturbance to the existing residential area and is not compatible with the existing land uses or the vision of this region. This area is a gateway into Weld County and the land uses in this area should reflect this significance to the residents of- and visitors to Weld County. Heavy industrial uses have the potential of being incompatible if not handled properly; however, Martin Marietta has taken steps to address compatibility issues. Martin Marietta's facilities as well as other heavy industrial uses co-exist next to residential uses in multiple USR15-0027 - Martin Marietta Page 6 of 20 locations in Weld and Larimer County as well as throughout the State. Weld County needs to ensure that Martin Marietta is taking steps to be a good neighbor, but ultimately in order to make a good decision regarding this application, Weld County needs to take more than just compatibility factors into consideration . Section 22-2-80. C. 2. - 1. Policy 3. 2. states, "The land use applicant should demonstrate that the roadway facilities associated with the proposed industrial development are adequate in width , classification and structural capacity to serve the development proposal." The application material state that the traffic generated by Martin Marietta will be up to 2,260 daily site visits. The roadway facilities associated with this industrial development require a number of upgrades before they will be adequate in width and structural capacity to serve this facility and this has been noted by CDOT, and Larimer and Weld County traffic engineers. The traffic from this project poses safety concerns for the surrounding community and commuters of U.S. Highway 34. With the addition of 2,260 vehicles accessing the site on a daily basis the potential for accidents between trucks & cars and trucks & trains increases significantly. Martin Marietta is committed to installing all warranted lane improvements on WCR 13 as well as Highway 34 and paying to install the traffic signal. This will bring the roadway facilities up to a standard to handle the anticipated traffic and address safety concerns. The Town of Johnstown Resolution states, in part: " the applicant forecasts a significant increase in the generation of traffic along Highway 34 and County Road 13 arising from its operation, with the potential to negatively impact residents of the area and drivers along the roadways." And "The proposed uses also include an increase in the use of the railroad line across County Road 17, which presently has only a rural crossing that may not be adequate to address safety and delay concerns arising from the increased traffic." Weld County already made the decision that WCR13 is an arterial road and is expected to be expanded to be a 4 lane road. Martin Marietta made a conceded effort to work within the planning efforts of Weld County and found a site that was adjacent to an arterial so that they could direct all of their traffic to the arterial. In addition, the majority of the residents in the area live within Indianhead Estates Subdivision with access onto WCR 15. In addition , Martin Marietta and Tetra Tech attended the Johnstown Planning Commission hearing when the Highway 34 Development project was presented to the Planning Commission by Johnstown Town Planner John Franklin. Mr. Franklin also acknowledged that the project that Johnstown approved on the northwest corner of the intersection of WCR13 and Highway 34 would benefit from Martin Marietta installing the signal light at the intersection. He also indicated that their proposed use of the northwest corner of the intersection would generate more traffic than Martin Marietta's proposed use. The Weld County engineer in the Department of Planning Services states: "There was no information in the traffic study concerning the train related traffic and safety issues." Martin Marietta's traffic engineering consultant, Gene Coppola has indicated that train related traffic and safety issues are not typically covered in traffic studies. In addition, it takes a specialized consultant and study to investigate these types of issues. Martin Marietta supports safe practices in all situations and recognizes that this should be done; however, this is an issue that that railroad companies need to work through with the PUC to determine if improvements are warranted for safety reasons. Martin Marietta will cooperate with the railroads and County regarding these concerns and how best to address them . USR15-0027 - Martin Marietta Page 7 of 20 The traffic impact study stated that 95% of the traffic will travel north on County Road 13 and 5% will travel south. The comments received from CDOT, the Larimer County and Weld County traffic engineers indicate that this is extremely unusual. If this site is a regional distribution center then it would seem that there would be a higher trip distribution to the south . The Weld County Traffic Engineer has stated that a more realistic trip distribution would be 75% of traffic traveling north on County Road 13 and 25% of traffic traveling south on County Road 13. The distribution may sound unusual; however, it was based on knowledge of Martin Marietta's business and its market. Weld County, CDOT, Larimer County and Weld County traffic engineers did not discuss this information with Martin Marietta before they came to the conclusion that the numbers sounded unusual . This facility will serve the region and Martin Marietta knows that their primary service area is Greeley and along the 1-25 corridor between Loveland and Fort Collins. Yes, some local deliveries to the south are expected , but Martin Marietta anticipates that there is not a big demand for materials in that direction. Should things change and more trucks need to head south to serve that market, Martin Marietta is fully aware that it is responsible for making warranted improvements to the roads based on the traffic that its facility generates. This is an issue that can be covered in the Improvements Agreement. It does not make sense to revise the traffic study to propose traffic numbers for something other than what Martin Marietta believes will actually happen . The intensity of the traffic proposed for the intersection of County Road 13 and U .S. Highway 34 warrants signalization as pointed out in by at least four referral agencies. Additionally, the auxiliary lanes on County Road 13 and U .S. Highway 34 will need to be extended in length and acceleration and deceleration lanes will need to be installed on both County Road 13 and U .S. Highway 34. Both the signalization of the intersection and the improvements to the auxiliary and acceleration and deceleration lanes requires coordination with the affected railroad companies. At this time there has been no comments submitted from Great Western Railroad Company concerning the expansion of the lanes along U .S. Highway 34. As indicated in correspondence submitted to the County, Martin Marietta has already committed to pay for the signal at the intersection and recognizes that they will not be reimbursed for any of those costs. All warranted lane improvements along WCR 13 as well as Highway 34 will be made by Martin Marietta and Tetra Tech engineering staff will be working closely with Weld County, CDOT and the railroad companies regarding the improvements. The addition of 2,260 site visits daily from this project poses safety concerns for the surrounding community and commuters of U .S. Highway 34. The increased traffic increases the potential for accidents between trucks & cars and trucks & trains. The impact of the traffic will adversely affect the roadway facilities in the area. The traffic projection of 2,260 vehicles is the projection for the year 2035. The property will eventually develop. No matter what the use, there will be additional traffic and other uses will likely generate even more traffic than Martin Marietta's proposed use. The warranted road and intersection improvements that Martin Marietta has committed to making will address the potential for accidents and prevent adverse impacts on the roadway facilities. The staff report does not recognize of the following Goal and Policy also found in Section 22-2- 80 which is the Industrial development Goals and Policies section of the Code: G. 1. Goal 7. Recognize the importance of railroad infrastructure to some industrial uses. 1 . 1. Policy 7. 1. Support the continued and expanded use of existing railroad infrastructure for industrial uses. Approval of the Highway 34 Development project would implement this Goal and Policy. B. Section 23-2-220.A.3 -- The uses which will be permitted will not be compatible with the existing surrounding land uses. There are 14 single-family homes/lots within 500 feet of this site. Indianhead Subdivision (approximately 100 lots) is located adjacent and northwest of the site Currently there is 121 USR15-0027 - Martin Marietta Page 8 of 20 a single-family residence on the site adjacent to County Road 56. The application materials state that some of the outbuildings associated with this home will need to be demolished in order to build the 24 foot high berm for the rail loop spur. The Department of Planning Services has received 763 letters and many phone calls concerning this USR. 534 letters — 70% are in support of this USR and 229 letters — 30% are in opposition to this USR. The supporting letters primarily originate from outside of Weld County: 42% supporting this USR are from folks living outside of Weld County, 27% are from folks living in Weld County in Greeley, Windsor, Longmont, etc. and 1 % are from Weld County Citizens living in the Johnstown area including Indianhead Subdivision. The comment about the outbuildings that may need to be removed to accommodate the berm is written in a manner that implies that the landowners don't approve of the demo. The outbuildings are on Highway 34 Development site and the landowners do not object to the removal of the buildings in order to accommodate the screening berm . The current tenant, whose lease will soon be expiring , objects to the removal of the buildings. The opposing letters primarily originate from Indianhead Subdivision : 23% are from Weld County Citizens living in the Johnstown area including Indianhead Subdivision , 5% opposing this USR are from folks living outside of Weld County, and 2% are from folks living in Weld County in Greeley, Windsor, Longmont, etc. The table below shows the breakdown for the letters. Table 1 — Surrounding property owner letters* Support - total number of letters . . 534 70% Live in Johnstown area including Indianhead Subdivision 5 1 % Live in Weld County (Greeley, Windsor, Longmont, etc) . 208 27% Live outside of Weld County (Fort Collins, Westminster, etc.) 321 42% Oppose - total number of letters . . 229 30% Live in Johnstown area including Indianhead Subdivision . . . 175 23% Live in Weld County (Greeley, Windsor, Longmont, etc) . 18 2% Live outside of Weld County (Fort Collins, Westminster, etc.) 36 5% *Letter count as of July 13, 2015 Total 763 The breakdown of the number of letters received is helpful. It is important to note that there have been more letters received in support of the project than opposed . The fact that many letters of support came from members of the community outside of the Johnstown area including Indianhead Subdivision should not be discounted because this project is a project that has County and region wide consequences if it is not approved. The issues cited in the letters that oppose this project include, but are not limited to: traffic, noise, dust, visual impact, lighting, odors, health concerns, air and water pollution, and safety concerns due to increase in rail and truck traffic. The following is an incomplete list of the concerns from letters of opposition: Health concerns from the processing of asphalt including, but not limited to, nitric oxide, styrene (ethenylbenzene), benzene, methyl ethyl ketone, hydrogen sulfide, heavy metals, formaldehyde, hexane, phenol, polycyclic organic matter, and toluene. Health issues due to long term exposure to low level carcinogens Health concerns related to toxic odors 4 Escalation of respiratory ailments (i.e. asthma) due to odors, smoke, dust and pollution Health issues for those who have allergies or who are sensitive to the emissions from the plant Visual impacts for the residents to the west including those who live in the Indianhead Subdivision Visual ugliness/degradation 121 USR15-0027 - Martin Marietta Page 9 of 20 Obstructed view to the west 4 Excessive dust from the processing of Ready Mix Concrete and recycling materials in the crusher/screener E. Dust, noise, and odors from the transloading conveyor belt E. Dust from traffic 4 Hazardous dust 4 Caustic dust that is detrimental to plant life, livestock, and humans 4 Odors from the processing of asphalt and concrete 4 Odors from train cars unloading asphalt cement 4, Odors from diesel trucks a Inability to sleep with the windows open due to odors 4 Light pollution Noise from train and machinery a Noise from the recycling crusher/screener 4 Noise from the rail a Backup beeping noise 4. Noise from the site interfering with those who work at home 4 Traffic concerns 4 Increase in commute times due to increased traffic 4. Traffic congestion at the intersection of U .S. Highway 34 and County Road 13 4 Damage to the roads due to increase in truck traffic Traffic delays on U .S. Highway 34 the gateway to area that will kill future growth 4 Increase in rail traffic 4 Potential for train derailment c Vibration from trains 4 Increase in train traffic may mean more trains at night that will disrupt sleep 4 Noise from rail including horns, whistles, car switching (uncoupling), and screeching wheel noise a Trains blocking County Roads (County Road 15, County Road 17, 54, etc. ) 4 Decrease in property values 4 Decrease in quality of life for the residential properties surrounding the site 4 Air pollution 4 Water pollution 4 Seeping of chemicals into the ground water 4 Inability to sell or re-sell homes 4 Pollution draining into the Big Thompson River, the Koenig Reservoir, and the adjacent ditches a Setting precedent for more heavy industrial operations to locate in this area 4 Disruption of the peace and quiet 4. Diminish the desire of people from outside the area to visit or relocate to this area 4 Negative impact to the ducks, geese, loons, pelicans, and herons in the area 4 Negative impact to the wildlife 4 Improper use of viable cropland 4 Safety for the workers at the asphalt plant 4 The high winds in Northern Colorado will sandblast the homes to the west a Safety concerns due to the potential for lightning strikes 4 Wildfires caused that may be caused by railroad sparks and human activity a Safety concerns due to the potential for dust explosions 4 Endangering the residents, travelers, and business people due to a potential for an accident or explosion at the Martin Marietta site S Explosion or accident due to deliberate human actions at the site 4 Families not being able to enjoy the outdoors due to odors, dust, and noise 4 Safety concerns for children due to increased truck traffic and rail 4. Deception from Martin Marietta in presenting the information about the project Letters of support are from people who do not live in the area and the negative impacts will not affect them Flawed traffic impact study L'J USR15-0027 - Martin Marietta Page 10 of 20 4 Flawed environmental study Safety of pedestrians, equestrians, and bikers on the County Roads 4 The revised rail (making a smaller loop and moving it further west) will require more trains will be required for the same amount of product to be delivered 4 The definition of the batch plant is not part of the Weld County Code and this asphalt manufacturing facility should be a continuous plant because batch plants 'make asphalt as needed' and continuous plants operate 24/7; Martin Marietta's asphalt plant is proposing to operate 24/7 therefore it is probably a continuous plant. 4 An aviation safety light may be required a Air quality for those who exercise outside a The placement of Martin Marietta at this location is not good planningScreening the asphalt and Ready Mix plats will be nearly impossible because of the uphill slope of lndianhead Subdivision as compared to the Martin Marietta site 4 Negative impact on the future development in the area Martin Marietta is aware of these concerns and has made modifications to the plan to address the concerns. The following is list of the reasons people stated they are in support of the project: a This site is crucial to the well-being and economic stability of northern Colorado a It is needed to maintain our transportation infrastructure a The project supports our construction industry 4 The project provides raw materials necessary for a thriving , clean, and functional community a The facility will directly employ over 100 people a It will indirectly employ thousands of residents in supporting jobs throughout the region a Martin Marietta will be a good steward of this property a Martin Marietta will keep a healthy relationship with its neighbors 4 It will generate significant sales and property tax 4 This operation will have a smaller carbon footprint due to its proximity to rail a The project will keep building costs more affordable a The [roject will help repave local streets, build new retail centers, and increase economic growth through housing and business development The project's location between two active railroads and close to major highways make it well suited a Economic growth can be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials a It would be a key stepping stone to long term improvement and growth for Weld County a It provides increased access to local resources It will help with employment for Colorado residents with a good wage a It will help stimulate business for suppliers and sub-contractors within the construction industry. a Martin Marietta has proven to be a dedicated company in meeting the needs of rapidly growing northern Colorado a Martin Marietta is working had to make the project environmentally safe and community friendly a Martin Marietta works with its employees to provide a good working environment a If this project is denied, the growth and need for raw materials will be a concern for this area in a few years, and we then may have to settle for a lesser-known company a Transporting resources by train will reduce the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances a Martin Marietta has a strong history of working with local , city, and state governments USR15-0027 - Martin Marietta Page 11 of 20 Martin Marietta is very aware of the regulations of its pit operations and meet/exceed them This site's location will reduce delivery time/impact for aggregate products This site's location will pass savings on to customers Martin Marietta will invest in the highest quality plants and equipment in order to minimize any environmental impacts This project will help control the escalating housing costs that are outpacing the growth income of the area This site's location utilizes land near existing rail lines that might otherwise go underutilized a The project will draw other tax-paying business to our region The noise, odors, and traffic from the proposed uses will cause disruption to the adjacent residential properties and safety concerns due to truck traffic on County Road 13 and U .S. Highway 34 especially where the truck traffic acceleration and deceleration lanes cross over Great Western rail on U .S. Highway 34. The Department of Planning Services believes that the negative impacts are such that there are no conditions that could be placed on this USR that would ensure the compatibility with the surrounding existing land uses. We are disappointed in the staffs recommendation . It does not appear that staff considered the extensive list of modifications to the project that Martin Marietta has made and offered as ways to address the concerns of neighbors. In addition , it does not appear that staff considered the important role this project plays related to the future of Weld County and northern Colorado. This was the only site of 13 evaluated that met all the locational criteria Martin Marietta required for the facility. We believe that we have demonstrated that Martin Marietta is ready to construct a facility that will allow them to operate compatibly with the surrounding area. As one of the leading suppliers of building products in northern Colorado, Martin Marietta knows that this facility is critical to the future of economic growth in the area. This recommendation is based , in part, upon a review of the application materials submitted by the applicant, other relevant information regarding the request, and responses from referral entities. Should the Planning Commission approve the proposal, the Department of Planning Services recommends the following conditions: 1 . Prior to recording the map: A. An Improvements and Road Maintenance Agreement is required for offsite improvements at this location. Road maintenance including dust control, damage repair, specified haul routes and future traffic triggers for improvements will be included. (Department of Public Works) We agree with this condition. B. A Final Drainage Report and Certification of Compliance stamped and signed by a Professional Engineer registered in the State of Colorado is required. (Department of Planning Services - Engineering) We agree 'with this condition . C. The traffic study should be updated to address the comments from CDOT, Larimer County, and Public Works. The study should include information pertaining to the additional train traffic and discuss local traffic impacts that may be created by additional train traffic. (Department of Planning Services - Engineering) Gene Coppola, the traffic engineer for this project, has advised that it is not common to include train traffic in a traffic study and that he is not qualified to complete such a study. The work that needs to be done is work that Great Western Railroad and the Union Pacific Railroad companies need to do. Martin Marietta will commit to providing information to the railroad companies that they need to evaluate their crossings and whether or not safety improvements are needed. In addition , Weld County can submit a request to involve the PUC if they don't believe that the railroads are adequately responding to concerns. USR15-0027 - Martin Marietta Page 12 of 20 D. The applicant shall address the requirements (concerns) of CDOT, as stated in the referral response dated July 6, 2015. Evidence of such shall be submitted, in writing , to the Weld County Department of Planning Services. (Department of Planning Services and Department of Public Works) VVe agree vvith this condition. E. The applicant shall address the requirements (concerns) of the Weld County Department of Public Works, as stated in the referral response dated July 6, 2015. Evidence of such shall be submitted , in writing, to the Weld County Department of Planning Services. (Department of Planning Services and Department of Public Works) VVe agree with this condition. F. The applicant shall address the requirements (concerns) of the Weld County Department of Building Inspection , as stated in the referral response dated June 4, 2015. Evidence of such shall be submitted, in writing, to the Weld County Department of Planning Services. (Department of Planning Services and Department of Building Inspection) VVe agree with this condition. G. The applicant shall attempt to address the concerns of Larimer County, as stated in the referral response dated June 16, 2015 and July 1 , 2015. Evidence of such shall be submitted, in writing , to the Weld County Department of Planning Services. (Department of Planning Services) We agree with this condition. H. The applicant shall attempt to address the concerns of the Town of Windsor, as stated in the referral response dated May 27, 2015. Evidence of such shall be submitted, in writing, to the Weld County Department of Planning Services. (Department of Planning Services) This has already been completed . A letter dated June 9, 2015 was submitted to Windsor and Weld County. Please remove this condition . I . The applicant shall attempt to address the concerns of the City of Greeley, as stated in the referral response dated May 27, 2015. Evidence of such shall be submitted, in writing , to the Weld County Department of Planning Services. (Department of Planning Services) This has already been completed. A letter dated June 9, 2015 was submitted to Greeley and Weld County. Please remove this condition . J . The applicant shall attempt to address the concerns of the Hill and Brush Ditch Company, as stated in the referral response dated May 20, 2015. Evidence of such shall be submitted , in writing, to the Weld County Department of Planning Services. (Department of Planning Services) This has already been completed . A letter dated June 26, 2015 was submitted to Weld County and the Hill and Brush Ditch Company. Please remove this condition . K. The applicant shall attempt to address the concerns of the Reorganized Farmers Ditch Company, as stated in the referral response dated May 18, 2015. Evidence of such shall be submitted, in writing , to the Weld County Department of Planning Services. (Department of Planning Services) This has already been completed. A letter dated June 26, 2015 was submitted to Weld County and the Reorganized Farmers Ditch Company. Please remove this condition. L. The applicant shall attempt to address the concerns of the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District, as stated in the referral response dated May 1 , 2015. Evidence of such shall be submitted, in writing , to the Weld County Department of Planning Services. (Department of Planning Services) We agree with this condition. M . The map shall be amended to delineate the following: 1 ) All sheets of the map shall be labeled USR15-0027. (Department of Planning Services) L'J USR15-0027 - Martin Marietta Page 13 of 20 2) The attached Development Standards. (Department of Planning Services) 3) The map shall be prepared per Section 23-2-260. D of the Weld County Code. (Department of Planning Services) 4) The applicant shall delineate the trash collection areas. Section 23-3-350.H of the Weld County Code addresses the issue of trash collection areas. (Department of Planning Services) 5) The map shall delineate the approved landscaping/screening. (Department of Planning Services) 6) The map shall delineate the lighting for the site. (Department of Planning Services) 7) The parking areas shall adhere to Appendices 23-A & 23-B of the Weld County Code. (Department of Planning Services) 8) Show and label the approved access(es), turning radii, and access permit number(s) on the map. (Department of Public Works) 9) Show and label the entrance gate set back a minimum of 100ft from edge of shoulder. (Department of Planning Services - Engineer) 10) Show and label all off-site auxiliary lane improvements. (Department of Planning Services - Engineer) We have no concerns with complying with items 1 -9. We would ask that item 10 be modified to indicate that a note should be added to address the off-site auxiliary lane improvements to be made. The reason for this is that many of the improvements are outside the boundary of the map and so showing them on the USR map is not practical . 2. Upon completion of Condition of Approval #1 above, the applicant shall submit one ( 1 ) paper copy or one ( 1 ) electronic copy (.pdf) of the map for preliminary approval to the Weld County Department of Planning Services. Upon approval of the map the applicant shall submit a Mylar map along with all other documentation required as Conditions of Approval. The Mylar map shall be recorded in the office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder by the Department of Planning Services. The map shall be prepared in accordance with the requirements of Section 23-2-260. D of the Weld County Code. The Mylar map and additional requirements shall be submitted within one hundred twenty (120) days from the date of the Board of County Commissioners Resolution. The applicant shall be responsible for paying the recording fee. (Department of Planning Services) We agree with this condition . 3. In accordance with Weld County Code Ordinance #2012-3, approved April 30, 2012, should the map not be recorded within the required one hundred twenty (120) days from the date of the Board of County Commissioners Resolution, a $50.00 recording continuance charge shall added for each additional three (3) month period. (Department of Planning Services) We agree with this condition . 4. The Department of Planning Services respectfully requests a digital copy of this Use by Special Review, as appropriate. Acceptable CAD formats are .dwg, .dxf, and .dgn (Microstation); acceptable GIS formats are ArcView shapefiles or ArcGIS Personal GeoDataBase (MDB). The preferred format for Images is .tif (Group 4). (Group 6 is not acceptable). This digital file may be sent to maps(a�co.weld.co.us. (Department of Planning Services) We agree with this condition . 5. Prior to Construction: a. If more than one (1 ) acre is to be disturbed, a Weld County Grading Permit will be required. (Department of Planning Services - Engineer) We agree with this condition . USR15-0027 - Martin Marietta Page 14 of 20 6. Prior to Operation: a. Accepted construction drawings and construction of the offsite roadway improvements are required prior to operation. (Department of Planning Services - Engineer) We agree with this condition . 7. The Use by Special Review activity shall not occur, nor shall any building or electrical permits be issued on the property, until the Use by Special Review map is ready to be recorded in the office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder or the applicant has been approved for an early release agreement. (Department of Planning Services) We agree with this condition U 1?] USR15-0027 - Martin Marietta Page 15 of 20 SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Weld LV LLC & Gerrard Investments LLC, c/o Martin Marietta USR15-0027 1 . An Amendment to a Site Specific Development Plan and Use by Special Review Permit No. USR-1584, USR15-0027, for any use permitted as a Use by Right, an Accessory Use, or a Use by Special Review in the Commercial or Industrial Zone Districts (construction business with two shop buildings, office buildings, and outdoor storage) provided that the property is not a lot in an approved or recorded subdivision plat or lots parts of a map or plan filed prior to adoption of any regulations controlling subdivisions to include a Mineral Resource Development Facility including asphalt & concrete batch plants (materials processing) and transloading in the A (Agricultural) Zone, subject to the Development Standards stated hereon. (Department of Planning Services) We agree with this standard . 2. Approval of this plan may create a vested property right pursuant to Section 23-8-10 of the Weld County Code. (Department of Planning Services) We agree with this standard . 3. The number of on-site employees for Gerrard Construction shall be 36, as stated by the applicant. (Department of Planning Services) We agree with this standard . 4. The number of on-site employees for Martin Marietta shall be 71 full-time employees, 45 truck drivers, and 25 field construction workers, as stated by the applicant. (Department of Planning Services) Martin Marietta does not want to be held to a set number of people they can employ to run their business. If the County wants to hold Martin Marietta to a number, they would rather be held to the projected number of trips generated by the site (2,260 daily trips by the year 2035). 5. The hours of operation for Gerrard Construction shall be 6:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. Monday — Friday and 7:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. Saturday, as stated by the applicant. (Department of Planning Services) This standard should probably be modified to reflect the fact that Gerrard will only operate on the site for a period of one-year following approval of the USR. 6. The hours of operation for Martin Marietta shall be 24 hours a day / 7 days a week: however, Martin Marietta will operate under the following restrictions: Hours of Operation for Asphalt: o The plant will typically only operate Monday through Saturday o The standard hours of plant operation will be limited to being between one hour before sunrise and one hour after sunset. o Load out from storage silos will be limited to being between one hour before sunrise and one hour after sunset. o When the plant is operating at night, it will only occur when material is requested by cities, counties or CDOT for night paving projects. Operations will be considered "night operations" when they take place between the hours of one hour after sundown to one hour before sunrise. Depending on the request of the jurisdiction purchasing the asphalt, night operations could occur seven days per week. o When Martin Marietta becomes aware of projects that require night operations, they will email the Weld County Planning Director to let him/her know about the plans to operate outside of daylight hours, who the project is for, how long it will be occurring, and where the materials are being delivered . Hours of Operation for Ready Mix Concrete: o The Ready Mix Concrete Plant will only operate Monday through Saturday. o Actual operating hours of the Ready Mix Concrete Plant will vary depending on weather and business levels. The plant will generally not begin operating until daylight. Occasionally, it may need to operate earlier to accommodate daily business demands; however, in no instance will the plant ever operate before 3:00 a.m . o The plant will not operate more than 16 hours per day. L'J USR15-0027 - Martin Marietta Page 16 of 20 o Ready Mix trucks will generally operate during plant operations, but may return to the plant after plant shutdown to be cleaned and parked. Hours of Operation for Aggregate and Recycling: o Aggregate sales and recycling operations will only occur Monday through Saturday. o Aggregate washing and recycling operations will only occur during daylight hours (dawn to dusk or 6:30 a.m . to 6:00 p.m. during the winter), actual operating hours will vary dependent on weather, and business levels. o Train unloading operations during the summer will only take place between the hours of 6:00 a.m . and 8:00 p.m . , actual hours will be dependent on the time the train arrives at the site. o Train unloading operations during the winter will only take place during daylight hours, actual hours will be dependent on the time the train arrives at the site. (Department of Planning Services) We agree with this standard . 7. The parking area on the site shall be maintained . (Department of Planning Services) We agree with this standard . 8. All signs shall adhere to Chapter 23, Article IV, Division 2 and Appendices 23-C, 23-D and 23-E of the Weld County Code. (Department of Planning Services) We agree with this standard . 9. The landscaping/screening on the site shall be maintained. (Department of Planning Services) We agree with this standard . 10. Should noxious weeds exist on the property or become established as a result of the proposed development, the applicant/landowner shall be responsible for controlling the noxious weeds, pursuant to Chapter 15, Articles I and II , of the Weld County Code. (Department of Planning Services - Engineer) We agree with this standard . 11 . There shall be no tracking of dirt or debris from the site onto publically maintained roads. The applicant is responsible for mitigation of any offsite tracking and maintaining onsite tracking control devices. (Department of Planning Services - Engineer) We agree with this standard . 12. There shall be no parking or staging of vehicles on public roads. On-site parking shall be utilized. (Department of Planning Services - Engineer) We agree with this standard . 13. The historical flow patterns and runoff amounts will be maintained on the site. (Department of Planning Services - Engineer) We agree with this standard . 14. Weld County is not responsible for the maintenance of onsite drainage related features. (Department of Planning Services - Engineer) We agree with this standard . 15. All liquid and solid wastes (as defined in the Solid Wastes Disposal Sites and Facilities Act, 30-20-100.5, C. R.S. , as amended) shall be stored and removed for final disposal in a manner that protects against surface and groundwater contamination. (Department of Public Health and Environment) We agree with this standard . 16. No permanent disposal of wastes shall be permitted at this site. This is not meant to include those wastes specifically excluded from the definition of a solid waste in the Solid Wastes Disposal Sites and Facilities Act, 30-20-100.5, C.R.S. (Department of Public Health and Environment) We agree with this standard . 0 USR15-0027 - Martin Marietta Page 17 of 20 17. Waste materials shall be handled, stored, and disposed in a manner that controls fugitive dust, blowing debris, and other potential nuisance conditions. The applicant shall operate in accordance with the accepted Waste Handling Plan, at all times. The facility shall operate in accordance with Chapter 14, Article 1 of the Weld County Code. (Department of Public Health and Environment) We agree with this standard . 18. Fugitive dust and fugitive particulate emissions should be controlled on this site. The facility shall be operated in accordance with the accepted dust abatement plan , at all times. Uses on the property should comply with the Colorado Air Quality Commission's air quality regulations. (Department of Public Health and Environment) VVe agree with this standard . 19. Adequate drinking, handwashing and toilet facilities shall be provided for employees and patrons of the facility, at all times. For employees or contractors on site for less than 2 consecutive hours a day portable toilets and bottled water are acceptable. Records of maintenance and proper disposal for portable toilets shall be retained on a quarterly basis and available for review by the Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment. Portable toilets shall be serviced by a cleaner licensed in Weld County and shall contain hand sanitizers. (Department of Public Health and Environment) We agree with this standard . 20. If applicable, the applicant shall obtain a Stormwater Discharge Permit from the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Water Quality Control Division. (Department of Public Health and Environment) We agree with this standard . 21 . Any septic system located on the property must comply with all provisions of the Weld County Code, pertaining to On-site Wastewater Treatment Systems. A permanent, adequate water supply shall be provided for drinking and sanitary purposes, as needed. The facility shall utilize the public water supply. (Department of Public Health and Environment) We agree with this standard . 22. All potentially hazardous chemicals must be handled in a safe manner in accordance with product labeling and in a manner that minimizes the release of hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). All chemicals must be stored securely, on an impervious surface, and in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations. (Department of Public Health and Environment) We agree with this standard . 23. A Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasure Plan , prepared in accordance with the applicable provisions of 40 CFR, Part 112, shall be available on site. (Department of Public Health and Environment) We agree with this standard . 24. This facility shall adhere to the maximum permissible noise levels allowed in the Industrial Zone as delineated in Section 14-9-30 of the Weld County Code. VVe agree with this standard . 25. The facility shall comply with all provisions of the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment Division of Oil and Public Safety Underground and Above Ground Tank Regulations, as applicable. (Department of Public Health and Environment) We agree with this standard . 26. Any washing areas shall capture all effluent and prevent discharges in accordance with the Rules and Regulations of the Water Quality Control Commission , and the Environmental Protection Agency. (Department of Public Health and Environment) VVe agree with this standard . 27. Process wastewater (such as floor drain and laboratory wastes) shall be captured in a watertight vault/container and hauled off for proper disposal Records of installation, maintenance, and 121 USR15-0027 - Martin Marietta Page 18 of 20 proper disposal shall be retained . (Department of Public Health and Environment) We agree with this standard . 28. The facility shall comply with the Air Pollution Emission Notice (A. P. E.N . ) permit requirements as stipulated by the Air Pollution Control Division, of the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment. (Department of Public Health and Environment) We agree with this standard . 29. Material being recycled shall be separated by material type or use. Incoming loads shall have all non-concrete, non-asphalt and non-rebar material removed from concrete and asphalt materials within thirty (30) calendar days. Non-concrete, non-asphalt and non-rebar material shall not exceed 10% of the total material onsite by weight or volume. (Department of Public Health and Environment) VVe agree with this standard . 30. Odors detected off site shall not exceed the level of seven-to-one dilution threshold , as measured pursuant to Regulation 2 of the Colorado Air Pollution Control Regulations. (Department of Public Health and Environment) We agree with this standard . 31 . The operation shall comply with all applicable rules and regulations of State and Federal agencies and the Weld County Code. (Department of Public Health and Environment) We agree with this standard . 32. Sources of light shall be shielded so that light rays will not shine directly onto adjacent properties where such would cause a nuisance or interfere with the use on the adjacent properties in accordance with the plan. Neither the direct, nor reflected , light from any light source may create a traffic hazard to operators of motor vehicles on public or private streets. No colored lights may be used which may be confused with, or construed as, traffic control devices. (Department of Planning Services) We agree with this standard . 33. A building permit may be required, per Section 29-3-10 of the Weld County Code. Currently the following has been adopted by Weld County: 2012 International Codes; 2006 International Energy Code; 2014 National Electrical Code; A building permit application must be completed and two complete sets of engineered plans bearing the wet stamp of a Colorado registered architect or engineer must be submitted for review. A geotechnical engineering report performed by a registered State of Colorado engineer shall be required or an open hole inspection. (Department of Building Inspection) We agree with this standard . 34. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Design and Operation Standards of Chapter 23 of the Weld County Code. (Department of Planning Services) We agree with this standard . 35. Necessary personnel from the Weld County Departments of Planning Services, Public Works, and Public Health and Environment shall be granted access onto the property at any reasonable time in order to ensure the activities carried out on the property comply with the Conditions of Approval and Development Standards stated herein and all applicable Weld County regulations. (Department of Planning Services) We agree with this standard . 36. The Use by Special Review area shall be limited to the plans shown hereon and governed by the foregoing standards and all applicable Weld County regulations. Substantial changes from the plans or Development Standards, as shown or stated , shall require the approval of an amendment of the Permit by the Weld County Board of County Commissioners before such changes from the plans or Development Standards are permitted . Any other changes shall be filed in the office of the Department of Planning Services. (Department of Planning Services) We agree with this standard . USR15-0027 - Martin Marietta Page 19 of 20 37. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with all of the foregoing Development Standards. Noncompliance with any of the foregoing Development Standards may be reason for revocation of the Permit by the Board of County Commissioners. (Department of Planning Services) We agree with this standard . 38. WELD COUNTY'S RIGHT TO FARM : Weld County is one of the most productive agricultural counties in the United States, typically ranking in the top ten counties in the country in total market value of agricultural products sold. The rural areas of Weld County may be open and spacious, but they are intensively used for agriculture. Persons moving into a rural area must recognize and accept there are drawbacks, including conflicts with long-standing agricultural practices and a lower level of services than in town. Along with the drawbacks come the incentives which attract urban dwellers to relocate to rural areas: open views, spaciousness, wildlife, lack of city noise and congestion , and the rural atmosphere and way of life. Without neighboring farms, those features which attract urban dwellers to rural Weld County would quickly be gone forever. Agricultural users of the land should not be expected to change their long-established agricultural practices to accommodate the intrusions of urban users into a rural area . Well-run agricultural activities will generate off-site impacts, including noise from tractors and equipment; slow-moving farm vehicles on rural roads; dust from animal pens, field work, harvest and gravel roads; odor from animal confinement, silage and manure; smoke from ditch burning; flies and mosquitoes; hunting and trapping activities; shooting sports, legal hazing of nuisance wildlife; and the use of pesticides and fertilizers in the fields, including the use of aerial spraying. It is common practice for agricultural producers to utilize an accumulation of agricultural machinery and supplies to assist in their agricultural operations. A concentration of miscellaneous agricultural materials often produces a visual disparity between rural and urban areas of the County. Section 35-3.5- 102, C. R.S. , provides that an agricultural operation shall not be found to be a public or private nuisance if the agricultural operation alleged to be a nuisance employs methods or practices that are commonly or reasonably associated with agricultural production. Water has been , and continues to be, the lifeline for the agricultural community. It is unrealistic to assume that ditches and reservoirs may simply be moved "out of the way" of residential development. When moving to the County, property owners and residents must realize they cannot take water from irrigation ditches, lakes, or other structures, unless they have an adjudicated right to the water. Weld County covers a land area of approximately four thousand (4,000) square miles in size (twice the size of the State of Delaware) with more than three thousand seven hundred (3,700) miles of state and County roads outside of municipalities. The sheer magnitude of the area to be served stretches available resources. Law enforcement is based on responses to complaints more than on patrols of the County, and the distances which must be traveled may delay all emergency responses, including law enforcement, ambulance, and fire. Fire protection is usually provided by volunteers who must leave their jobs and families to respond to emergencies. County gravel roads, no matter how often they are bladed, will not provide the same kind of surface expected from a paved road . Snow removal priorities mean that roads from subdivisions to arterials may not be cleared for several days after a major snowstorm. Services in rural areas, in many cases, will not be equivalent to municipal services. Rural dwellers must, by necessity, be more self-sufficient than urban dwellers. People are exposed to different hazards in the County than in an urban or suburban setting. Farm equipment and oil field equipment, ponds and irrigation ditches, electrical power for pumps and center pivot operations, high speed traffic, sand burs, puncture vines, territorial farm dogs and livestock, and open burning present real threats. Controlling children's activities is important, not only for their safety, but also for the protection of the farmer's livelihood. (Department of Planning Services) We agree with this standard. LI USR15-0027 - Martin Marietta Page 20 of 20 7/20/2015 Highway 34 Development USR15-0027 ., 4 �. . • ._ -z • - �� saa � } J �f �,�Z I. fi o Vot • • Weld County Planning Commission HearingAk Martin July 21, 2015 2:!_; Introductions Martin Applicant: Martin Marietta Patrick Walker, President, Rocky Mountain Division David Hagerman, P.E., Regional VP/GM — Aggregates Abbott Lawrence, Regional VP/GM — Ready Mix David Lemesany, Regional VP/GM - Asphalt James Sham, Natural Resource Manager Britney Guggisberg, P.E., Senior Project Engineer Julie Mikulas, Land Manager Walt Wright, Environmental Engineer Tom Turpen, Electrical Manager Introductions Martin Land Owners Gerrard Investments, LLC Gary Gerrard, Owner Nate Gerrard, Owner Patrick Groom, Legal Counsel Weld LV II, LLC EXHIBIT Anal 7/24/2015 HighwayE34®evelopment Introductions Marti USR15m027 Applicant:Martin[ /larietta Patrickfwalker,[president,Citocky3VIountainEDivision David[ iagerman,P.E.,[ tegionaIN/P/GMI - Aggregates Abbott[iawrence,t tegionaIE fP/GML- Readyf 'lix DavidLtemesany,L1tegionaftWP/GM TAsphalt James[ harn,EIWaturaftesource[ /lanager Britney[iiuggisberg,[W.E.,[SeniorNroject[tngineer • __ .. JulieRVIikulas,mandLiJlanager Weld[lountylPlanningliommissionlllearing M Walt1M/right,LlnvironmentallIngineer July621,llol5 t: ^ " Tomi rurpen,IllectricalE1/lanager Introductions A&trth Introductions ►r+cta, LandlDwners Consultantl7leam Gerrard[Tnvestments,[LLC Tetra[Sech GaryI 3errard,Dwner Pamlfora,[ ICP,CJ'lanning[ ndI'ermitting Nate[5errard,[Dwner1i Fernando{ 1e1[ /lonte,[JI'.E.,[CivilLEngineer PatricklX room,IiegalLtounsel Evonne[3chroeder,i:iologist WeldmVRI,LLLC AEC0M Paull,: urge,mNCEt;:d.Lrert.,Mloise[analysis Introductions a Martin : :tatbontaI1 Consultant)Team Stewa rtli nv i ro n m e n to ftto n s u l to nt s,LIL LC David[Stewart,[Ph.D.,L .E.,[ ,ir[imissions11 MII) ChaseE k1ullengi/isualLanalysis[i/Iodel Genelloppola,IW.E.,LTraffic[ingineer FosterNaluationE Company1ALLC Mike1Smith,3/IAI,LUalue®iminutionl tudy 1 7/24/2015 Companyverview aMa1� Safetytfirst /A Martin 1' • ale, HONORtI •ci PLANT" a� hik - r • 7 a Communityinvolvement aMartin NorthernColoradoll aMartin Economicmutlook 0I . rrrrrrr.a.rectaa:cciaa:m:euaa wu.rvr,nt„, 5 ro Aj • *Tip \ Larimer else .. • Sponsor _ • . )lil -p Touch a Truck Day _ __� Greeley 2015 2015- 2035 n Population Growth '� t1 J• Percentage may, • Bike to Work =_ r•Me t Day 2015 CSU Student Tour of �'• ;� 25-49 Ft. Collins Facility , —,f' ' _ . Source: State Demography Office r MaterialsEBuilditommunities am' WeldEtountyltvlajorrEmployers XMartin Transportation Manufacturing and Energy / ,, Networkiew CI 11.(,; ) -� Vestal Banner I-lealtli tHealth III II0',,Ak and 4 noble Education stator energy ,, a fe r anadarkeu Business sup Hensel Phelps tE • Roche Residentialilliih Construction CO= lepinoFoods • ConIruc ors. Inc. Agriculture Source:3Ql4u.'20i5tXconom�atvemogrophlCprofileYIctdtou myJCi d ooroo 2 7/24/2015 Understandingionstruction0 a Martin Martin Materials[�n{WeldIounty The[ ig[ icture®Asphalt Ti �� - ' F r yM.. 7 f -• f I .1 _-4 1 � wt� �v�,t1 �l atiirei . 1 I f• Northern[roIorado's9 X Martin a Martin AggregateEResources TheEBig[Picture®Aggregates • • 'y`a - , Concrete Aggregate and Asphalt Aggregate will be i Y - 'f depleted from Northern Colorado in about 5 years. FortLouins k. / 2 L 1 t • ‘ r _ I, ^a \ d >71 Loveland 1'. a - _ . . ; u - • Dig Th ompson - t;a .JI— River r - �� w concrete�ggregate Asphalt•.Aggregate .w / w1 ' •' . ._sas''_• 11..- A.,_'•a:� Mort hernaolorado's18 SouthiWlattejtiver ---j Futurel1vliningl Area a e The[ lew[ ou rcelibfl lggregate a Martin a Martin Thet: igCicture®Transportation .4 2-3 Trains a�� amok " � £ Granite anyonl uarry 1 Train n -- -- _- --- -- _ _ ' • I`IighwaylS4tevelopment • AN U.— lid —JUN ma lil a e_- Ma►w-----n.•.aww.► i •••••••••••• r• • 4 aereria .-baslMa soN... X •. MB sommiernme .f.a was.acV.rean.i W1��.Yi Yid. r • T•••T.T1 etTT Y141.4*4t 0.................a 0. : f -s t- mM1iaksliasi/isocia• e o n•w•+-64 3 7/24/2015 a Martin a Martin Site[Selection y Sitel3election . a• # i •t - . North' reeleylitaila A• lan t c..•� .• .. , Great WP °�' Va. �,.� l Corridorl�ubarea ;, y A . - • . Stern RQ�t ■d �..• • • .. rri a } • _ • • t 'IN: 'lib.l i �•� _ . . _... . . , t ^ , •.2. re. I I . • • •1 t .. w4w site i I • l ,all Ir[a tX- i. • • s•u. L f . . . +- ; D s.., aim. l • 'seto } • r :[< �•,w •.**,•; • -. at, at yw •.ate 'gle']••n b • • o►r as• R •••... l . t 1 a Site[l5election Martin SitelSelection Mart. r - , . at4 . - • ' N • • • i el tea. • r rouse 2 0200 Se..4 lea IF >r i ---- 4I _ .w.. q, 4., - o-so_ {t•• =s', a r $ •...: Martin Site[SelectionMart, � Site[selection[triteria ' - t f , • '.Y -4— -- `•• to_ ems. riks • 1A Criteria s 3 e ! s s 7 ! 9 so ss sz 19 GOl •t .• 1 Fit 6000'ralkoad track bop 0 0 0 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 O7 • y r : I! Void of track obntructfons • • • 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 2 A ' 'a • C�C f ' 'IA Elevation drop•1S• • • • • _ 2 0 0 • • • i • 0 .p Close to Hwy 318 I-25 • • • _ 2 0 0 • . • • • 0 d�j^ St t• • Sltnallfed Might • • • 0 . 2 2 . • • • • 0 O0' .v. Low Impact to county roads • • • • 0 ' 0 0 • • • • 0 Co,. �V Few neighbors • • • 1 I I • • • • 0 ao, ar. Avoids subdivision entrances • • • • '0 2 1 Total 0 0 0 1 9 8 7 1 1 1 2 a -1`T- eta • • ^,9f . WV 0:No 1=Maybe 2•Ves •=Nor evaluated as to lilts not bang able to accommodate M itfal Melt criteria a M ••' I .,hM; 43.I' 4 7/24/2015 AK Martin Vici nityfi/la p a Martin SiteCelectionfptions Tied.r43742fur- +"1.`'r . iii , QP y.' y �p o S r Z 4 �' r } °• fir% 3F4, °a. N. 4. _� ,f11114-,r,, Ory5' pyi R• 1r /LF �'C f q ' C q qi�q O • 4 ' I, Parcelslncludedln[liSR aMartin SitelPlanR- Sitelaccess a Martin carat or. C_ . I , , I% I L'ttMliarr.. - s."44. .- - ! . �`` • _ 1 �, .1; 0 1 NIP i Sitel IanL�- a SitelPlanIN- Aggregatesi a a Martin a Martin TheffrainlItmdfltaill3pur Recycledfi/laterials t rr ' . W It Illiii:‘‘,. I La,r. \ . /../\1‘ kliA1/4411. ' * E 1 • o sing`mss► r 5 7/24/2015 SiteC1'lanC1- M Martin M Martin AggregateNrucl toute SiteEPlanE- Ready[MixCEoncrete . ! . . , : -ti 7-L,L1:0 i` z 50 r illo: _ A A 7. : ' ,tilt �• 4 :.- �� • . :� Martin HighwayC4®evelopment0 a Martin Site[PIanL i- Asphalt Servicelarea �/� ```j —.rat,_ , �" _ /R!. " ... F .a O r. A - : , S1 Allyn 2013 Y Traffic®Projections h& Martin Traffic - Proposed[iitoute a ►''tiartin • •fir- • *_ . ! '�•�1•.,- _ilallainkr ,�' I` 'vim ., SW 6 7/24/2015 Utilities amartin Proposedl3chedule aMarti,',_: • Planningt ndEPermitting WaterflittleLfhompsonalVater�istrict • Sitel evelopment • Ready( vlixfloncreteEWlant®perational • Railttonstructionl2J Sewer:Lommercial[Septic[Systems • Asphalttflantatonstruction and1 ortable11oilets • SiteUfullyl perational IliElectricIPower:[Woudrel falleaEA Community[ oncerns a Martin Community[Vleetings ate. Prowsed WELCOME M.krn arse y 'l'4t.wa S4 Sewn•gnashes r.. ('()11('l et Q Proposed Highway 34 Site 'r°K" Open House ca1••w•tr plant u 'ts M..t.1t January 26,2014 Neighbors claim SIartin Starielta plant will ruin the mi(sati(st• 4:00-7:00 PM June 9.7015 gateway to Creelec and their lifesgies StipI X nit /Adair /A—" IIr e/1eW a.r1w Rnidentt 10 cOnlpiny:'Not in ow backyard' .. _. ._ i IIIIb—.-_ - eyhw ay l3 P.e1e.1 W.nr1 VI t tJ oo avyptl Wj,. ti.?q I&!dm)70151410 Asphalt, concrete facility moves _ '� C0.r mp1°•r forward for land east of Loveland I r `~"""� .-0.-i--6 IW..Jrr1....Y•.n.1..P••1-'.. I. lay a.MS 111,Om*Immo r.,-.••nema nil..w I 1 Thisfliteas[lheIEest®ption[4or1 /�A theEtutureLbfalVeldItounty � rtm Communityloncerns �, ` .� • Jrorr l4 • Concerns ,.•••• o �+' n* ualtty/Mea►th 0itet abrior firi . ._; . . Traffic el 4! l' I r + ``t S1 s. t • f ,s� �' Visual3mpactstB 1nufvow lhimpall[Aity, \ +lZr4 I \ PropertyWalues ..... _....... . ....... ..... O UVddlife 7 7/24/2015 Stud ies[tonducted[3ince[ Main AirRQ Ualitytiiiiiiiiffilliddlliiiiiiiiii a Martin January12015 //h'' or.etta DustlIontrolMileasures Studies®ndltReports PreparedllorUnderstandla TypicaldlSRM AdditionalRI Potentialimpacts RequiredtStudy Study �_ �` TraffidStudylll . w • � IL 9 1 Sound Analysis Report 440.a.- ,. Visuallnalysisitdlodei TTT — O Answers totAsphalt:PlanthtealthilZuestions _ Water truck used in Vegetative cover mit Paved Roads& unpaved/unvegetated ReviewlaftPotentialJmpact,bnIOrganidTarms ___•_• Street Sweeper -li areas fr Wildlife Desktopaieview art • — • WaterEesoutxsPdtnpacti3teport .. .. "'� F;it. .tCommunityt$enefitslx fIndustry �. t .artReal$stateEDirninution Study 1Martinadtarietta'frultureaxflt5afetylrandlb 1y Commitmenttlo3ustainability _ L1 - e- Water sprays at Baghouse at Partially enclosed hopper transfer points asphalt plant HealthL &lSafetyh+iuhiiuuui a M Martin WeldEtountyrDepartmentL f� /�/� Martin Air[PermittingFtompliance �M PublicrilealthE ind[Environment �M r C D P H E MEMORANDUM 7 \ , itA i. J r ' — TO. Diana Au t. Plann ServKes Tnnit v_ . . . .. ',Mg, �115U1i�1I1�S CO Martin �� . ' FROM Lauren Light Environmental Health . Y• SUBJECT: U$R15.0027 Martin MaM!'A '� �- DATE- 7144015 • nil— Air emissions: reviewed by Phil Qrewer wCOPI4 The facility will be appropriately controlled for the emisvons of art polutMNs(criteria and HAP-s I by the Language+.nhen Mo the tonsbucbon Perms'that w4 be issued to the concrete and asphalt operations by the Coloado Department of Public Health and Ennrorvnent Alf Poulton Control Dimon tthe'Drinsion') The permits'will be written for the control of emissions of particulates 1PM PM 10.PM?51 and crderw pollutants (CO. NOx SO.,and VOC) Some of these pollutants wilt be emitted at rates greater J` than I ton-year The permits will be Hntlen for 9+e control of engssrons of HAPs specifically fomaldenyde and Hexane I both of-which'nrll be emitted at levels ,-250 'year) The permits wS be written spetrfically for the control of fugiv.e particulate emissions caused by truck activity. The'Fugieve Emissions Control Plan*is written alto every permit issued for concrete asphalt and aggregate plant operations WaterCEuality a Martin HealthERSafety® X Martin AsphaltTlantC telatedEtoncerns - P`1 r ' - . ,� . . _, . -, nrIl1/44. ,C I • '..1 il :t ;T I� . LI, I /a r F �, It t . C New Hospital Facility Q Established Asphalt Plant 8 7/24/2015 HealthE 3afetymiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii a Martin OdorMontrol jAmartin Organic arming Emisslo Capturw: System xi . .7-zzc. a,, x _ Verticals - ��! Liquid[�CL Carboni J~f J Filters . Tanks ,.r - . a, h3 ; ' I; l ,. USDA �"' . . ,k- : ORGANIC • _ Ql✓•,- Traffic - ProposedM Martin Traffic:I:roposedEi Martin TransportationOmprovements Transportationlimprovements - - HIG rrgHWAY 34 C. 7_4') \ O,,A CC a 3 cf, C^Pd/ rid'/^ ! 4. `L0 • O'O 04 of 0 • da UnderstandingCtloisel evels aMartin Noisel3tandardsEl aMartin LOUDNESS COMPARISON CHART (dBA) Lam=Utea1001 None Intl I'-an,ul Ira.. 80 A[}Aar., Si Adman Y Vr•oe•1.Int ® 4n Mt 70 ¢ 60 i re1aoonYar 4 II SO O 90 t...a r..r.r. - Om.m.!AI.LL••• ® r..4.••rti....0 Cu uu - _ _ �;Imo: . b.. �... I 50 rp�va 4.a 7D twat la4•c•.I• 30 pion ea•roe 0 :.7 r...tan 20 Cal 1Ms l.Fs ® :lama Osellisto it) 6•01•••�I—a•✓ � _- Caro ur. ' \Main M/.^ „....2,,, ••••r an"•••In Matr.vu 0 to tk Ilse ® .� ..4 w. DAY NIGHT OIO ......4.•yM+ h"• "°"y a Residential Limits ®Industrial Limits io ins•1••••u r.•w•••..4•.I O I—n..4•u u.tw.w..••.% An Mltm.w 11f I ESA Il barfly gurrap11D1.W Me arum.M 9 7/24/2015 Projected[ loiseC t[ roperty0 Marti, ProjectedlNoiseC tlResidenceshiii'. ',4++i+(on linelEased[bnVlodeling based[tnilnodeling 80 80 70 70 60 so so 49-55 dBA BA CO W CO W V V 30 30 20 20 10 10 0 _ - - 0 - DAY NIGHT DAY NIGHT m Residential Limits a Industrial Limits I Residential Limits ■Industrial Limits NoiseMitigationllvleasures0 a mann. BufferC ndCC�/e etated[ erms NoiselAitigationnMeasures0 g SoundlliNalIstlinder3tudy llir r_" • /ethack' Sou ndCWalIs- VegetatedibermsL, r IT. ! 1' % ,. - ,.. I %NI i' , j • s. 4 - .. NoiseVlitigationl vleasures0 Martin NoiseC /IitigationC Vleasures0 ,, , Equipment®esign/Placement '' • Acousticall nclosures w BelowI 3radei1IopperF (examplerfromtt$nother3ite) 'II i , 1t .fin.. ..° � r, I ter-- +�+-+-- .. .' . . " 10 7/24/2015 NoisellVlitigation[TVleasures0 Martin Martin ControllingLTruckC loise a Noise[3Vlonitoring[i'rogram !, Designed circular truck route i p patterns for all trucks to prevent • r r the need for trucks to back-up. ' • 4, f +ts? 4 .141 All Martin Marietta trucks have _ white noise back-up alarms. • r�_ - Visual[Study0 aMartin Visual[Study:A/iewliromCAO aMartin ,....aNi t -...P., . �,�. e C ,y,. ak kN44 TA - . illa iiiiihk_ri i %Tr-- r / . iiii.2.40 it % I. • Visual[Study:f/iewE4romt i IA Martin VisuakStudy:M/iewPfrom[tEl IA Martin • 4 _ - - , y1- 7illoi I - - r . ___ 11 7/24/2015 Visuall tud NiewC rom®i] XMartin VisualC tudy:C�//iewsC romp XMartin y' thellighway[343Corridor lailliall --Aillii---- 414 , 14 zit-117 :---1.,....teL,„" •- 446ive_ a _ I a .• , "litt I. Visual[ tudy:( /iewsEIrom i VisuaIt3tudy:EN/iews[ rom0 Martin a Martin the[ Iighwayl34[Corridor thellighway[ 411Corridor --17---z...,-----=4"-- _-_•--- El • �~ - - lirili a alg... app-..-"aliC......- C St lot jape: VisuaI!3tudy:E /iews[ romE a Visualimpact1 Vlitigation0 M Martin a Martin /A thel-IighwayiS413Corridor OnC ite[1andscaping —11.101110 r---all ee ® 4 i; • Pr" AND I 111111111111-- ,1 - 12 7/24/2015 Visual©mpactE /IitigationLI a Martin Martin FundE or®ffI itea.andscaping PropertyF�9/alues 'COMPARABLE SUBDNIS1Dt6B Ill . ' SOIaI6Wdge •''—" sail (Wia.tau w sup Blum Rant v at Quad Rlap r" tt+.w ttaoi e r sri.Al6't q I L4e ' - - Burps Ranch �.' Ptn®t1 WIMP"'"lade RS*Pld Yes No p sod s.r,roe. usepoo u o 000 _ I tow rt.te Pin sias.aoo s�ysoo '"r•z�.c�•.• C !f '�' r Await SJr Pee Sr16JTs YrrP6960 a. ! ,.T_ , s ' Awrare Abmr[Ita6r Lnty Ataa SF :,110 :SSl �- Asea�e Sale Pew Pet SF 5IOa SIfs '�� at— San of 5*. 4 S _ ---"S Asegr Da'i'iallalM 69 ST—illillrillKi '--� Asea9r Yea.1Coratrtw 1997 H66 Without trees in the backyard. With trees in the backyard. 0 ® I PropertyNaluesEtonclusion a Martin Wildlife[findings a Martin RAPTORS Ilott.aud, of hone. throughout Sothein(oloa o have been cortsatr,c I and sold in piouulity to uidusttial uses- atasel aunts. awhile batch plants. R.- m.) ote Latch plants. Lulu a\s.and Ala Lase,swain in ttital.iry to chose pluwcd i to the Martin\Lutett t Weld Cowry 14 vomit Analysts of the lased sales data i res tiled s en souls sale Iglus pet uptue toot to smelt-faintly hones located to / t and out of piounuty to name Intense untustn:d ax; sntulu to tbox plumed : • • r Matfett. as of the hate IS. 20I' due of saint a is unlikely that coupleewn of = the Manus Marietta Weld Courtly XI project as plumed will result in a i4ntuwtiwi " in saint with[cloud to future sale prices of sutsle4aiw sues - - i —a—- Bald eagle Ferruginous hawk Prairie falcon Rapcctnel stausaed. GROUND-NESTING MIGRATORY BIRDSjo,Yom^ AI A. MAI ' CO Certificate's K-G I00036005 - foster Valuation('nnuaam• 1 I (- Tin. A ,y. Dickcissel Lark bunting McCown's longspur Short-eared owl TakingECompatibilityESeriouslyi Compatibility a Martin Morten Redesigned[ItailF3pur tin :� A, in • • a �ir._s.A* _ From this... To this.... is • l` .• ._ _ I �., :• T�- i; • r tea. -, e. �, r_ fit' 1 - - t�}• lam" �� % �(] iG Sr, \\\ a�1' f` `¢ `r wrxsc I -'- l t ill I Nara1 6� .e „ ,.;oar --•-• tI ht1 i. e� • I 4 117 .1 _ 13 7/24/2015 Taking[Compatibility[ eriously0 martin Taking[Compatibility{3eriously[ iM M Martin [Restricting -IoursL f®peration Limiting[ he3-leight[tbflighting ,o t Operational Lighting : ' 9��/7, > Limited Hours of LED light poles s 11/ Operation limited to 25' tall C. ' s rather than 35' tall TakinaompatibilityllSeriously a Martin InputC rom[rommunities a Martin Neighborhood[ I lorking[Eroup �M ! • 'to Pit. Ill.' ,,- AdC'C 9- r � • ay ;,t • " %. • • ewe<oR� , �; i 1W • 1 0147,j 4 I ._ ',‘N.ag . . ." ate liZ.3i- See .00 ,. �, ' fir. � 1 y9 •3 — , r R TheEfonvergence[bf l a Martin Martin Transportationlnfrastructure WeldCountyCriteria • r I . .... .7 _ '!]`rte iiiilattiN A Greeley : A :.. Loveland _ .0e• gar �' r i Hf hwa 4tevelo ment ., I A i t F I C L • iill 14 7/24/2015 Staff[ teport Martin :;: ; : ecommeh1thtio �MMartin i RequestEthanges[to: , .., • Summary ��,ti _ ,�� • ConditionsCtbf[approval �� `�� DevelopmentStandards f,. r: . _ a ..,its sir � r aMartin Questions Applicant: Martin Marietta Consultant Team Pau k Wa:ker,President.Rocky Mountain Dmsion Tetra Tech David Hagerman,P.I .Regional VP/GM-Aggregates Pam Flora,AICP. Planning and Permitting Abbott Lawrence,Regional VP/GM-Ready Mix David Lemesany,Regional VP/GM •Asphalt Fernando del Monte. P.E.Civil Engineer lames Sham.Natural Resource Manager Evonne Schroeder,Biologist Rritney augpsberg,D.E.,Senior Project Engineer AECOM Juke Mikulas,land Manager Paul Burge, INCE Etd.Cert.,Noise Analysis Walt Wright.Environmental Enpnees Stewart Environmental Consultants. Lit David Stewart,Ph.D.,P.E..Air Emissions Land Owners MIG Gerrard Investments.llC Chase Mullen,Visual Analysis Model Gary Gerrard.Owner Gene Coppola,PE.,Traffic Engineer Nate Gerrard.Owner Dr. Michael Kosnett,Health Questions Patrick Groom,Legal Counsel Foster Valuation Company(AC Mike Smith, MAI,Value Diminution Study 15 li Martin David Hagerman VCrlcttC Regional VP/GM -Aggregate District July 2O, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Ms. Aungst: Please find enclosed Martin Marietta's responses to the Twenty Potential Questions to ask MMM at June 9 Public Meeting document we received from Mr. Kisker, President of CLR-34NA and the emails associated with the questions. Many of the questions required additional review by Martin Marietta that delayed the response to the group's questions. Sincerely, t s David Hagerman .d . , Rocky Mountain Division 10170 Church Ranch Way, Suite 201 , Westminster, CO 80021 EXHIBIT t. (720) 245-6405 f. (303) 657-4414 m. (303) 648-1554 e. david.hagerman@martinmarietta.com A O www.martinmarietta.com - � Twenty Potential Questions to ask MMM at June 9 Public Meeting 1 . Your USR application, as submitted, is incompatible with the normal activities of a residential neighborhood. Specifically, what changes have you now made to the site plan that will allow me to continue my right of quiet enjoyment of my property? Martin Marietta has worked diligently to address concerns raised by surrounding neighbors and in doing so, modified the original project significantly between the January 27, 2015 open house and the USR submittal. These modifications are a direct result of concerns raised by surrounding neighbors. The following modifications were made to the project prior to submitting the USR application. 4 The secondary access was relocated from Weld County Road 56 to Weld County Road 13 isolating traffic entering or leaving the facility to Weld County Road 13. Additional berming is proposed within the facility to create additional visual and noise barriers. 4 Modifications to the asphalt plant include acoustical enclosure around the burner for additional noise controls, installation of vertical liquid AC tanks to minimize concerns related to odor. 4 Train unloading was modified, originally the site would start with top unloading activities and transition within a two to four year period to bottom unloading. Train unloading will now begin with bottom unloading moving the unloading activities further away from the largest concentration of neighbors. 4 The plant will be painted neutral colors. 4 The submitted USR application has approximately 30 acres, which will remain agricultural or natural. This will act as a buffer between the industrial activities and the largest concentration of neighbors. Additional modifications made to the USR after the initial submittal include: 4 To further reduce concerns related to odor, carbon filters will be installed at the asphalt plant. This plant and Martin Marietta 's existing plant in Fort Collins will be the only plants with these additional controls in the State. 4 The rail loop was modified creating additional distance between rail activities and the largest concentration of neighbors, the distance was doubled from 372 feet to 736 feet. 4 Martin Marietta has proposed the creation of a Community Workgroup comprised of surrounding neighbor representatives, Martin Marietta officials and, hopefully, an independent member selected by Weld County. The group would meet to review any concerns, and performance relative to USR requirements. 4 Landscaping will be added to the project to create additional visual and noise buffers for surrounding neighbors. In addition, up to $100,000 from Martin Marietta will be made available to surrounding neighbors through the Community Workgroup for the installation of additional landscaping to their own property. 4 Martin Marietta is working with CDOT and will pay for the installation of a light at the intersection of Weld County Road 13 and US 36. 4 A noise monitoring program will be established. The program will be monitored by Weld County and the information will be made available to the Community Workgroup. 4 A street sweeper will be stationed on the site to deal with any potential vehicle tracking issues. 4 The height of the operation lighting light poles was reduced from 35 feet to 25 feet, the same height as all of the security light poles. Martin Marietta strongly believes the project will be compatible with the surrounding neighbors and, through the additional modifications made to the project as a direct result of addressing neighbors ' concerns, we have further increased compatibility related to the project. Additionally, industrial sites and residential neighborhoods co-exist next to each other in Weld and Larimer counties and throughout Colorado. We have evaluated a number of similar sites and believe that with the mitigation techniques that we have proposed, the Highway 34 Development project will be compatible with residential neighborhoods. 2. I am a light sleeper and live near your proposed rail loop. However, I need fresh air at night. Are you willing to absolutely limit your hours of operation to allow me to continue sleeping in my home? Martin Marietta 's existing application is requesting to the ability to operate 24/7 to respond to special project requests from Weld County and other customers; however, most days the facility will only operate during daylight hours, Monday through Saturday. The plant will operate longer during the construction season and less during the winter, early morning and night work will generally only occur intermittently during the construction season. In response to comments heard from the community regarding the proposed hours of operation, Martin Marietta would like to provide the additional detail regarding our requested hours of operation. 4 Hours of Operation for Asphalt: o The plant will typically only operate Monday through Saturday. o The standard hours of plant operation will be limited to being between one hour before sunrise and one hour after sunset. o Load out from storage silos will be limited to being between one hour before sunrise and one hour after sunset. o When the plant is operating at night, it will only occur when material is requested by cities, counties or CDOT for night paving projects. Operations will be considered "night operations " when they take place between the hours of one hour after sundown to one hour before sunrise. Depending on the request of the jurisdiction purchasing the asphalt, night operations could occur seven days per week. o When Martin Marietta becomes aware of projects that require night operations, they will email the Weld County Planning Director to let him/her know about the plans to operate outside of daylight hours, who the project is for, how long it will be occurring, and where the materials are being delivered. 4 Hours of Operation for Ready Mix Concrete: o The Ready Mix Concrete Plant will only operate Monday through Saturday. o Actual operating hours of the Ready Mix Concrete Plant will vary depending on weather and business levels. The plant will generally not begin operating until daylight. Occasionally, it may need to operate earlier to accommodate daily business demands; however, in no instance will the plant ever operate before 3:00 am. o The plant will not operate more than 16 hours per day. o Ready-mix trucks will generally operate during plant operations, but may return to the plant after plant shutdown to be cleaned and parked. 4 Hours of Operation for Aggregate and Recycling: o Aggregate sales and recycling operations will only occur Monday through Saturday. o Aggregate washing and recycling operations will only occur during daylight hours (dawn to dusk or 6:30 am to 6:00 pm during the winter), actual operating hours will vary dependent on weather, and business levels. o Train unloading operations during the summer will only take place between the hours of 6:00 am and 8:00 pm, actual hours will be dependent on the time the train arrives at the site. o Train unloading operations during the winter will only take place during daylight hours, actual hours will be dependent on the time the train arrives at the site. 3. I often have friends over for barbeques and evening or weekend gatherings. We also enjoy watching the sunset over the mountains. I am concerned that your industrial operation will cause my patio to be unsafe and unenjoyable for my friends and family. How will crushing concrete, releasing asphalt cement odors, operating heavy equipment, bringing in rail cars, loading and unloading trucks and trains in my back yard happen without causing my family to suffer from the noise, dust, odors that come with industrial activities? Martin Marietta 's project will provide a safe environment in which people will be able to enjoy their property in the manner to which they are accustomed Martin Marietta is planning a 12-acre buffer zone from the closest houses in Indianhead Estates Subdivision to the railroad loop; the site will have approximately 30 acres of total buffer space between Indianhead Estates and the largest concentration of activities on the site. The concrete and asphalt plants are planned to be more than 2, 000 feet away from the nearest Indianhead houses. As indicated in the description of the proposed hours of operation (see response to question 2), most days, activities at the facility will be wrapped up and the facility closed for the day in the early evening when most people are returning home from work. The asphalt plant that we are proposing will have more odor control measures in place than the asphalt plant of any other company in the State. Martin Marietta has strived to approach residential noise limits at the surrounding property owner's homes and all operations will operate well within all applicable environmental regulations, which are designed to protect the health and safety of citizens and the environment. 4. You say that you operate near residential communities in dozens of locations. However, in most parts of the country, your facilities are surrounded by dense forests (in Raleigh, North Carolina, for example). Will you agree to plant a similar dense forest that surrounds your property with at least a 500 foot buffer zone so that we can have the same environment as those who live near your other plants? Martin Marietta has operations throughout the United States and utilizes existing vegetation in areas to create additional visual buffer. The current site is a farm field with no free cover and planting a dense forest on this site does not make sense in this Colorado landscape. However, Martin Marietta is preparing a landscaping plan built on the input of surrounding neighbors, which will include clumps of deciduous and evergreen trees around the perimeter of the property and proposed screening berms will have vegetative cover. In addition, we have moved the rail realignment to increase the distance between rail activities from 372 feet to 736 feet from the largest concentration of neighbors. 5. Although your toxicologist has minimized the health significance of your admittedly toxic releases, the National Institutes of Health and the American Heart Association do not agree. In particular, your toxicologist didn't even address the tons of small, particulate dust that your operation will spew. Since most of the health damage may not be evident for years, are you willing to place at least $75Million in a Martin Marietta Victims Compensation Fund that would not require litigation to access? It is unclear which items in particular the National Institutes of Health and the American Heart Association are not in agreement with; however, all operations and the site will undergo an extensive air modeling process which will take into consideration PM10 and PM2.5 in developing the final permit for the operation. This process will be conducted by Trinity Consultants and the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) will review the application before issuing a permit. CDPHE will only issue a permit for a facility once it determines that the facility is meeting all applicable ambient air quality standards. The facility will operate well within applicable ambient air quality standards and will be routinely inspected by CPDHE; therefore, a fund as proposed is not required. In fact, modeling shows this state-of-the-art plant would meet California 's regulatory standards, the strictest in the county. 6. We understand that you will be upgrading the roads on the corner of Hwy 34 and County Line Road. Are you willing to limit all incoming and exiting truck traffic to only using that upgraded route? How will you regulate and control all of the employees and independent operators who may impact neighboring roads that are not upgraded should they deviate from that route? Martin Marietta will work with the county regarding required road improvements. In addition, Martin Marietta will post a sign directing all truck traffic to turn right from the facility unless it is a local delivery. Employees live throughout Weld and Larimer counties and each will take a respective appropriate route, just as any surrounding neighbor takes an appropriate route to travel to their place of employment. 7. Various migratory and other species of wildlife have been noted in the area, including bald eagles, great blue herons, foxes etc. If there are endangered species nesting within the two mile radius that will be impacted by odor, dust and truck traffic will you cease operation until the mating and nesting season is over? Similar to what agricultural operations do in Weld County, Martin Marietta will comply with the following regulations and any regulations that are appropriate to protect wildlife in the project: 4 Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA). The ESA is designed to ensure that actions a federal agency authorizes, funds, or carries out are not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any listed species or result in the destruction or adverse modification of designated critical habitat of such species. The law also prohibits any action that causes a "taking" of any listed species of endangered fish or wildlife. Likewise, import, export, interstate, and foreign commerce of listed species are all generally prohibited. 4 Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918 (MBTA). The MBTA "makes it illegal for anyone to take, possess, import, export, transport, sell, purchase, barter, or offer for sale, purchase, or barter, any migratory bird, or the parts, nests, or eggs of such a bird except under the terms of a valid permit issued pursuant to Federal regulations. " "Take is defined in regulations as: 'pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or attempt to pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect. ' " 4 Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940 (BGEPA). The BGEPA "prohibits any form of possession or taking of both bald and golden eagles through criminal and civil sanctions as well as an enhanced penalty provision for subsequent offenses. Further, the BGEPA provides for the forfeiture of anything used to acquire eagles in violation of the statute. The statute excepts from its prohibitions on possession the use of eagles or eagle parts for exhibition, scientific, and Indian religious uses. " Take includes "pursue, shoot, shoot at, poison, wound, kill, capture, trap, collect, molest or disturb. " 4 Title 33 Parks and Wildlife - Wildlife: Articles 1 and 2 of the Colorado Revised Statutes. This statue contains a state list of endangered or threatened species. The statute makes it unlawful 'for any person to take, possess, transport, export, process, sell or offer for sale, or ship and for any common or contract carrier to knowingly transport or receive for shipment any species or subspecies of wildlife appearing on the list of wildlife indigenous to this state. " Take is defined as "means to acquire possession of wildlife; but such term shall not include the accidental wounding or killing of wildlife by a motor vehicle, vessel, or train. " 8. Are you aware that your operation will be impacting people with acute mental conditions or those receiving cancer treatments? Since the wind often travels east to west, the odors and dust will travel to the existing and new facility that will be opening soon. Adding a disturbing odor and pollutant to those already suffering may make it difficult for them to focus or sustain healing. Will you stop production if you receive complaints from local health facilities? Human studies have found no clinical evidence that asphalt plant production has contributed to illness or cancer. Studies by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry under the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services have verified that emissions from asphalt facilities do not present an environmental or public health hazard. In northern Colorado, several medical facilities operate within the same distance as the proposed Highway 34 site, if not closer. Banner Health 's new hospital in Ft. Collins is located within close proximity to two asphalt plants, and an active aggregate operation. In Lafayette, a new medical complex was completed in similar distance to two ready-mix plants and an asphalt plant and a railroad. Additionally, in Colorado Springs, the new VA Clinic is immediately across the street from Martin Marietta 's asphalt plant. These facilities would not have been constructed close to these industrial activities if such activities presented risk to their patients or staff. 9. Obviously all of the residents, businesses and wildlife in the area are likely to be negatively impacted by your locating your industrial facility in our homes and back yards. Are you willing to compensate us for our losses of property values, health impacts or loss of quiet enjoyment? The real estate analysis completed by Michael Smith, MAI of Foster Valuation Company LLC, in which impacts to property values was studied, indicates no diminution in property values is expected. This is based on looking at similar residential developments adjacent to similar industrial activities compared to residential areas without these activities. Martin Marietta worked diligently to modify the USR application to address neighbors ' concerns and the facility will operate within applicable regulations that are designed to protect the community and the environment. 10. My son is susceptible to migraines. I was told by a previous owner of an asphalt plant that the emissions from asphalt cement can cause severe migraines or even death. By building your plant next to existing homes, you are subjecting my family and others to an unacceptable risk for the pollutants and odors from your materials. Are you willing to put in writing and make the continuation of your operation dependent upon not increasing or causing health issues? If statistical evidence implies that impacts to their health are caused by your facility, will you commit in writing to surrendering the USR and promptly closing the industrial facility and remediate the property? The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment will set emission limits for the Highway 34 facility to be protective of human health and environment. The amount or level of emissions permitted to be released at this plant will not pose a health risk to employees or neighbors. Martin Marietta worked diligently in modifying the USR to address neighbors ' concerns and the facility will operate within applicable regulations that are designed to protect the community and the environment 11 . If your application is approved, it will begin a long nightmare for your neighbors. Will you post a Reclamation Bond, sufficient to return the land that you will use to greenspace, including the removal of all structures and contamination, including the rail loop so that can be sure that our nightmare will finally end someday? Martin Marietta is developing a long-term facility that has been designed to utilize the most current technology available; we have incorporated numerous modifications, as previously outlined, to address neighbors ' concerns; and the facility will operate within all applicable regulations designed to protect the community and the environment. Therefore, a reclamation bond will not be posted. 12. Despite your claims to the contrary, it is self-evident that Property Values will be negatively impacted as has been shown to be the case near other undesirable activities such as gravel pits and landfills, where the affected radius extends up to 5 miles or more. It's estimated that the negative impact of your operations will be at least 30% and as much as 50% for the nearest properties. Will you fund a Real Estate Compensation fund of at least $75 Million to compensate current residents who sell their homes in the next twenty years? Thousands of homes throughout northern Colorado have been constructed and sold in proximity to industrial uses including gravel mines, asphalt batch plants, concrete batch plants, railways, and other uses similar to the intensity to those planned from the Highway 34 project. A property value report prepared by Michael Smith, MAI of Foster Valuation Company LLC, using the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practices, indicated that no diminution in property values as a result of this project are expected. Analysis of paired sales data revealed very similar sales prices per square foot for single-family homes located in and out of proximity to more intense industrial uses similar to those planned. Foster Value Company 's report concluded "it is unlikely that completion of the Martin Marietta Weld County 34 project as planned will result in the diminution in value with regard to future sales prices of single-family homes. " 13. Since Indian Head Estates site is significantly higher (as much as 100 feet) than your proposed industrial site, 10-20' berms will do little to screen your raised rail bed, your 100 foot tall asphalt plant and your 110 foot tall concrete plant. Would you be willing to limit the height of all of your structures to no more than 50 feet, as well as construct a heavily forested conservation easement as a buffer zone of at least 500 feet to offer a modest amount of screening to the surrounding neighborhoods? The current site is a farm field with no tree cover, however, Martin Marietta is having a landscape plan prepared that is built on the input of surrounding neighbors. It will include clumps of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs around the property and undulating berms on the east side where space permits. In addition, the rail realignment has now increased the distance between rail activities and the largest concentration of neighbors from 372 feet to 736 feet. Structure heights have been minimized. The tallest portion of the facility will be the ready-mix concrete plant 's silo at 110 feet; the next largest structure will be the asphalt plant 's load out silo at 100 feet. 14. Since it is documented that even low level of concrete dust cause obstructive pulmonary disease and you will be generating tons of this type of dust at your facility, you should be responsible for regular health examinations of all residents within a two mile radius similar to the monitoring that you do for your own employees. Are you willing to accept that cost and pay for any related medical expenses caused by your dust along with paying for the relocation of any impacted families in order for them to be in a safe neighborhood? All operations and the site will undergo an extensive air modeling process, which will take into consideration PM10 and PM2.5 in developing the final permit for the operation. This process will be conducted by Trinity Consultants with CDPHE reviewing and issuing a permit. CDPHE will only issue a permit for a facility once they are confident that the facility will meet all applicable ambient air quality standards. The facility will operate well within applicable ambient air quality standards and will be routinely inspected by CPDHE; therefore, a fund, as proposed, is not required. 15. You have stated that you are a "good neighbor" and that you go beyond regulatory requirements to minimize your impacts. However, the only current example of this is related to noise, where your consultant's calculations indicate that you may approach the residential noise limits if you were to actually implement all of the mentioned mitigations. If this were any other type of USR on Agriculturally zoned land, you would be subject to the loss of your USR permit if you violate the residential noise requirements of 55dB in the daytime and 50 dB at night. Are you willing to stand behind your consultant's calculations and make meeting the residential noise requirements at your property line a condition of your USR permit, thereby losing it if you are guilty of repeated violations? Would you agree to a limit of no more than 3 violations per month, or 10 in any four consecutive months at which time you would lose your permit? Weld County noise regulations Chapter 14, Article IX Section 14-9-40 established the noise limits for industrial activities (80 dba during the day and 75 dba at night) and the limits are measured at the property line of the noise producer property. The noise study submitted to Weld County indicates that Martin Marietta 's Highway 34 project will perform well with the limits established by Weld County. Additionally the noise level at the closet surrounding residents will be very near residential limits. The model is based on the maximum noise producing activities all taking place at the same time. As discussed in response to the hours of operation question posed earlier, actual noise levels will likely be reduced throughout the majority of the year. Martin Marietta has volunteered to implement a noise-monitoring program that will have Weld County oversight. The standards applied will be consistent with the Weld County Code. 16. I am a surgeon and am routinely up all night in the Emergency Room dealing with an intestinal bleed, for example. To recover, I sleep during the day. How will you make sure that I'm not disturbed by the heavy industrial noise being continuously emitted by your facility? The facility is being designed with acoustical enclosures, berming, and vegetation to reduce the noise level at the closet surrounding residences. Depending on the location of your property, it is very likely that the noise level at your residence will be at or below residential limits (50 decibels). For example, 50 decibels (dB) is equivalent to a dishwasher running in the next room, normal speech from someone talking 3 feet away is 70 dB, and a gas lawnmower 3 feet away is 100 dB. 17. As the people who actually live in the area know, the currently proposed site has a high water table—during the summer time, it can be within 2 feet of the surface. Are you willing to provide ongoing ground water monitoring and post a bond or set up a trust that would compensate all parties, including wildlife and downstream water users for any and all contamination? The safest way to minimize ground water and run-off impacts would be to line your entire site with a clay liner to contain all spills and other water quality risks. To demonstrate that you actually WILL BE a good neighbor, would you do that at the very beginning, instead of requiring litigation to make it happen? The Highway 34 project will have a Stormwater Management Plan and a Spill Control and Counter Measure Plan approved by CPDHE. Best management practices and secondary containment will be utilized at the facility in the control of runoff and the storage of fuels and oils. These will be approved by the appropriate government agency. The facility will have no underground storage tanks. Martin Marietta evaluated the need for a groundwater monitoring well program as compared to similar facilities and does not believe a monitoring program is warranted. 18. Your application minimizes your impact on the organic farm across WCR 13 from your site. However, the dust that you will emit, as well as the toxic pollutants may accumulate in the soil and eventually be incorporated into the produce, not only at that organic faun but also in the neighbors' gardens, etc. The State of Oregon does not even allow the siting of asphalt plants within 2 miles of vineyards because of this issue. Would you be willing to fund a comprehensive soil monitoring program (at least quarterly, all heavy metals, organic pollutants such as metanapthalene, etc.) for all of the surrounding area to a radius of 2 miles to assure that none of your pollutants are accumulating in the soil, and to immediately shut down your operation without the need for litigation and compensate the victims if accumulation is found? The Highway 34 site is being designed to utilize the latest technology at the asphalt plant. The facility will operate well within applicable ambient air quality standards and will be routinely inspected by CPDHE. Martin Marietta had a review of organic farming standards completed and confirmed that the proposed operations would not affect organic farming. Part of the area is agriculture with ongoing heavy aerial spraying adjacent to the organic farm and neighborhood gardens with industrial activities located just to the west of the proposed site. Martin Marietta will not fund a soil-monitoring program that encompasses a two-mile radius with numerous industrial, commercial, and non-organic farming activities already in operation in the area. 19. The emissions from your operation are referred to as "criteria emissions" by the EPA, and are responsible for degradation in local and overall air quality as measured by the EPA's Air Quality Index. Despite your claims of the safety of your emissions, the EPA says that at an AQI higher than 50, health symptoms begin to occur in sensitive individuals, and that at an AQI of 101 , ". . .persons with heart and lung disease, older adults and children are at greater risk from the presence of particles in the air." Would you be willing to fund a comprehensive network of realtime AQI monitoring stations for the surrounding area to alert neighbors if the AQI rises above 75 so that they may stay indoors? If the monitoring network indicates that AQI exceeds 101 , would you agree to shut down your entire operation until the air quality improves? Air Quality Index is a regional measure impacted by many factors outside of Martin Marietta 's control that are not a result of Martin Marietta 's proposed operation. Martin Marietta will not fund a comprehensive network of real-time AQI monitoring stations, as AQI is for regional measuring. 20. Odor is often the most common complaint from neighbors near an asphalt plant, despite your assurances to the contrary. The CO standard for a violation is that the odor must still be noticeable with a 7X dilution. However, asphalt fumes that pass the 7X dilution requirement may still be quite strong, annoying and even sickening. Some jurisdictions set the limit for odors at a 2X or 4X dilution. Since you claim to want to be a "good neighbor", would you agree to a permit requirement that would exceed the CDPHE allowance and instead accept a 4X dilution as the limit? Would you agree to fines and penalties, including the loss of your USR if there were more than 5 documented violations in a year? Martin Marietta has evaluated the request to lower the dilution requirement to 2X or 4X dilution. However, we believe that the additional controls being incorporated into the plant to reduce odor concerns is sufficient Therefore, will not reduce the dilution requirement 21 . One of the slides that you showed on Tuesday indicated substantially lower noise levels at night. What portion of your facility would be operating with this noise output level? Noise levels represented are related to asphalt plant-loading activities. As indicated in the hours of operation discussion, the majority of activities which include train unloading will occur during the day. 22. You have publicly stated that you will eventually be shipping 2 million tons of product out of this facility. Yet, the stated maximum annual capacities of your concrete and asphalt plants together only account for about 1 million tons of product, implying that the remaining product will be raw aggregate. How much raw aggregate will you be shipping to your Greeley and Ft. Collins facilities, both initially and at full production? How much will be shipped to concrete/asphalt facilities owned by others? Aggregate shipments of site will make up the remained of the product not utilized for onsite operations the exact volume of shipments as well as the split of sales between internal and third party will be dependent on market conditions. STEWART ENVIRONMENTAL AC EC CONSULTANTS, LLC MEMBER ENGINEERING FOR LIF E July 20, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N . 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 Subject: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development. Response to Letter written by Dr. David W. Kisker to Weld County Commissioners dated June 18, 2015 and titled, "Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development." Project No. : 4572.003 Dear Ms. Aungst: Stewart Environmental Consultants, LLC (Stewart) is pleased to provide our responses, on behalf of Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. (MMM), to Dr. David Kisker's review of the Air Emissions Assessment prepared by Stewart Environmental as part of MMM's Use by Special Review permit application to Weld County. Dr. Kisker's review included a review of his work by Ms. Marjorie Klitch; this letter also addresses her limited comments. We would like to note that the original scope of Stewart's Air Emissions Assessment was to estimate the air emissions from the asphalt and ready-mix operations in the same manner the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) Air Pollution Control Division (APCD) would perform the estimate. Throughout Dr. Kisker's assessment, he has used the worst case for all scenarios. He has attempted to put assessments of his own into the report, which needs further clarification. Stewart has completed our assessment based only on the best estimates provided to us by MMM . The other purpose of our April 2015 report was to determine if the AERSCREEN results would recommend additional analysis by AERMOD, a more detailed modeling tool. The results of the AERSCREEN model concluded to further proceed with an AERMOD modeling effort. This is being completed by Trinity Consultants from Denver as part of the permitting process that would be required by CDPHE. For reference, Table 1 lists the information provided by MMM for use in our assessment. Although the asphalt plant has the capacity to produce 500 tons per hour (tph), the plant will be limited to 450,000 tons per year (tpy) of operating time. The air permit that will be issued by the APCD will limit asphalt production based on the annual process limitation, not an hourly capacity, per Regulation No. 3, Part B, II.A.4. EXHIBIT I 3801 AUTOMATION WAY, SUITE 200 I FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80525 I T: 970.226.5500 I F: 970.226.4946 I W: STEWARTENV.COM CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND SCIENTISTS Weld County Commissioners Weld County Department of Planning Page 2 of 13 July 20, 2015 Table 1 - Information provided by MMM for use in Stewart's Assessment Operation Plant Type Annual Production Central Mix (90%) 292,500 cuyd/yr Ready Mix Concrete Truck Mix (10%) 32,500 cuyd/yr TOTAL Concrete 325,000 tpy Drum Mix Recycled Asphalt 90,000 tpy Natural Gas Drum Mix New Asphalt 360,000 tpy Natural Gas TOTAL Asphalt 450,000 tpy We have included a summary of Ms. Klitch's comments in italics and follow them with our response . 1. The emissions and production rates in Stewart's document are confusing and inconsistent within the document, with what has been stated elsewhere, and with what was apparently used in the modeling. When applying for a permit, modeled emission rates must match the facility's maximum emission rate, as the modeled emission rate then becomes a permit limit. For example, if MMM uses an emission rate representative of 360 tons per year (tpy) in their modeling, then the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) will limit their allowable production to 360 tpy. MMM has stated in other parts of the document, and at public meetings, that their production will be anywhere from 400 tpy to 500 tpy. The inconsistency of these and other details casts suspicion on Stewart's attention to detail and quality assurance practices. The total asphalt annual plant production is 450,000 tpy, which is considerably higher than what is stated above (off by a factor of 1,000). New asphalt production will comprise 80 percent of the total annual asphalt production; this equates to 360,000 tpy. Recycled asphalt will comprise 20 percent of the total annual asphalt production; this equates to 90,000 tpy. These values are illustrated in Stewart's Air Emissions Assessment report and calculations under "Asphalt Plant" and "Asphalt Recycling". The report has been revised to better discuss the asphalt production breakdown and details the total asphalt production of 450,000 tpy from combining these two production rates. Although the asphalt plant has the capacity to produce 500 tons per hour (tph) maximum, the plant will be limited to 450,000 tpy of capacity. The air permit that will be issued by the APCD will limit asphalt production based on the annual process limitation (tpy), not an hourly capacity, per Regulation No. 3, Part B, II .A.4. 2. The use of AERSCREEN for a facility with multiple buildings, multiple sources, fugitive emissions, and nearby terrain higher than the facility's stacks is questionable. EPA's regulatory model, AERMOD, would be more appropriate in this context. In the dispersion modeling, Stewart implemented the EPA screening program AERSCREEN. Screening models are usually designed to evaluate a single source or sources that can be co-located . When screening models are utilized for multiple sources, it is necessary to model each source separately and then add maximum STEWART ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, LLC Weld County Commissioners Weld County Department of Planning Page 3 of 13 July 20, 2015 impacts from each model run to determine an overall impact value (Air Dispersion Modeling Guidelines for Arizona Air Quality Permits, September 2013). Results utilizing this methodology are expected to be conservative since the maximum impacts from each modeled source (regardless of different impact locations at different times) are summed for a total impact value from a facility. This is the approach that Stewart has taken with the asphalt plant and the ready-mix plant. 3. In their calculations document "MMM-Hwy34-Calcs, " they state that the distance from the source to their property line is 900 feet (equal to 274 meters), and that the distance to the nearest residence is 1350 feet (equal to 446 meters). Yet they proceed to apply AERSCREEN's results for 900 meters (about 2953 feet) for the property line impacts, and to use results for 1350 meters (4429 feet) for impacts at the nearest residence. Ms. Klitch is correct that the corresponding AERSCREEN concentrations generated in the April report were the result of using incorrectly converted distances. The property line distance of 900 feet converts to 274 meters, and the nearest residence distance of 1,350 feet converts to 411 meters. The emission estimates were recalculated and are presented later in this response letter. However, the overall result of being in compliance with the NAAQS remains the same. We have included a summary of Dr. Kisker's comments in italics and follow them with our response. 1. Problem #1 — Understated Asphalt Plant Production • The USR application states that annual production will be 450,000 tons. In their calculated total emissions for the asphalt plant, Stewart states that the 450,000 production was used. However, upon checking Stewart's calculations, we find that an annual production rate of only 360,000 tons per year was actually used. Stewart notes that some of the time, part of the production will consist of recycled asphalt product, and a similar calculation is made for a 90 tpy production rate of recycled asphalt. The total asphalt annual plant production is 450,000 tpy, as indicated by MMM. The asphalt plant production was modeled to show the totals between the types of production, new asphalt, and recycled asphalt. MMM indicated that 80 percent of the 450,000 tpy is to be new asphalt; this equates to 360,000 tpy and is illustrated as such in Stewart's Air Emissions Assessment report and calculations. The recycled asphalt will comprise 20 percent of the total asphalt production; this equates to 90,000 tpy. This is also shown in Stewart's Air Emissions Assessment report. Therefore, the total asphalt production is addressed in this report and is shown under each respective facility. Stewart's Air Emissions Assessment report has been revised to better discuss the asphalt production breakdown and details the total asphalt production of 450,000 tpy from combining these two production rates. • In the EPA's AP-42 tables, the recommended emission factor for CO is reported as 0.13 lbs/ton. Thus, a CO emission rate of 0. 13 lbs/ton of production should be considered to be an upper limit for permitted emissions and should only be replaced for strong technical reasons. Stewart, at the request of MMM, did not use the tabulated EF for CO. Instead, a value of 0.29 lb/ton was used without justification, despite, as shown in Figure 1, the claim that the AP-42 values were used. Since the permitted emission amount will be based on this analysis, MMM does not plan to be required to meet the level of operation that the EPA recommends for asphalt plant emissions, which would be less than half of the calculated amount. STEWART ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, LLC Weld County Commissioners Weld County Department of Planning Page 4 of 13 July 20, 2015 Dr. Kisker correctly states that AP-42 Chapter 11 Section 1 specifies an emission factor of 0. 13 lb/ton for CO emissions from a drum mix dryer at a hot mix asphalt plant operating on natural gas. For other asphalt facilities in Colorado, CDPHE has historically used an emission factor of 0.40 lb/ton. EPA has issued guidance to CDPHE, which permits the use of alternative emission factors. MMM had discussions with the APCD and mutually agreed to use 0.291 lb/ton for the hot stationary hot mix asphalt plant located on North Taft Hill Road in Fort Collins. This deviation from AP-42's emission factor of 0. 13 lb/ton and from APCD's emission factor of 0.40 lb/ton is based on hard data from a previous internal stack test conducted at the Taft Hill Facility. On January 7, 2015, the APCD issued the Taft Hill permit with the requested CO emission factor of 0.291 lb/ton, which equates to a permit limit of 72.2 tpy. MMM also requested a CO emission factor of 0.291 lb/ton for the U.S. Highway 34 asphalt plant, which would equate to a permit limit of 65.5 tpy. It is expected that the APCD will approve the use of the CO emission factor of 0.291 lb/ton for the U .S. Highway 34 asphalt plant as was accepted for the Taft Hill asphalt plant. Using the AP-42 CO emission factor of 0. 13 lb/ton, the CO emissions from the drum dryer are estimated at 29.3 tpy. Using the CDPHE CO emission factor of 0.40 lb/ton, the CO emissions from the drum dryer are estimated at 90.0 tpy. Using the MMM — CDPHE specified CO emission factor of 0.291 lb/ton, the CO emissions from the drum dryer are estimated at 65.5 tpy. Stack testing conducted at the Taft Hill Facility estimate annual CO emissions of 41 tpy. Refer to Table 2 for this comparison . Note, the facility is in compliance with the NAAQS at the boundary utilizing the 0.291 CO emission factor. Table 2 — Comparison of Estimated CO Emissions from Drum Dryer Emission Factor (lb/ton) Source Estimated Emissions (tpy) 0.13 AP-42 29.3 0.40 CDPHE 90.0 0.29 Specified by MMM 65.5 N/A i Stack Testing 41.0 2. Problem #2 - Incorrect Concrete Plant Emissions • Stewart reports the plant wide concrete plant emissions for an annual production of 325,000 cu yds/yr, and indicates that it's for a central mix plant. The USR also reports that the annual production will be 325,000 cu yds/yr. In the APEN that MMM submitted to the State of Colorado, the annual production rate that is requested was 400,000 cu yds per year. We agree with Dr. Kisker that Stewart's Air Assessment Report listed 325,000 cuyd/yr as the annual production from the ready mix concrete operations. This value was also used in Stewart's calculations for estimated emissions. At the time the report was written and the calculations were completed, the anticipated production rate for the ready mix operations was 325,000 cuyd/yr. It is very possible, and common for this type of project, that the anticipated annual production rate was increased as the project neared final design, occurring after Stewart's Air Assessment Report had been finalized. Please see Table 1 for a list of information that was provided to Stewart by MMM for use in the assessment and accompanying calculations. . STEWART ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS , LLC Weld County Commissioners Weld County Department of Planning Page 5 of 13 July 20, 2015 As of June 29, 2015, it has been verified by MMM that they will revise the submitted APEN to reflect an annual production rate of 325,000 cuyd/yr. Therefore, the calculations have not been revised for a production rate of 400,000 cuyd/yr. • In the APEN submission, MMM emphasizes that the plant will be capable of both truck mix and central mix production. However, the emissions reported by Stewart are the values for central mix production only. The EF values, and therefore the estimated emissions from truck mix operation are substantially higher than those for central mix operation. Because the plant is capable of truck mix production, the estimation of emissions must be based on the emissions from this type of production in order to accurately represent the emissions and their risk to the neighboring residents. Based on the footnotes of AP-42 Table 11.12-2, the tabulated EF values for the Loading process are not given in the standard "lbs/ton of concrete production", but are instead scaled to the total amount of cement and cement supplement (see pages 11.12-8,9). This means that to convert to "lbs/ton of production"; the loading EF's must be multiplied by 0. 14. This was not done in the Stewart report. Stewart was initially informed that the ready-mix operations would be a central mix process. Therefore, all emission calculations were completed for a central mix process. Since the Air Assessment Report was finalized, it has been determined that the ready-mix operations will be capable of both central mix and truck mix, with 90 percent of operations central mix and 10 percent of operations truck mix. Per AP-42 Chapter 11, Section 12-1, operational emissions and associated emission factors for all concrete batching operations are separated out into six main sources. The first five sources and emission factors are the same regardless of whether the plant is a central mix plant or a truck mix plant: aggregate transfer, sand transfer, cement unloading to elevated storage silo, cement supplement unloading to elevated storage silo, and weigh hopper loading. The sixth source is determined based on the type of plant: mixer loading (central mix) or truck loading (truck mix) . Therefore, the only difference in calculating estimated emissions from a central mix plant vs. a truck mix plant is whether emissions from mixer loading, truck loading or a combination of both are accounted for. As shown in Table 3, the emission factors for truck loading are greater than the emission factors for mixer loading. Table 3 — Comparison of AP-42 Emission Factors for Central Mix vs. Truck Mix Uncontrolled I Controlled Total PM Total PM-10 Source Total PM Total PM-10 (lb/ton) (lb/ton) (lb pollutant/ton cement-cement aggregate) Mixer loading (central mix) 0.572 0.156 0.0184 0.0055 Truck loading (truck mix) 1.118 0.310 0.098 0.0263 Stewart agrees with Dr. Kisker that AP-42 emission factors for weigh hopper loading, mixer loading and truck loading are not given in lb pollutant/ton of material loading as are the transfer and unloading operations. In the Air Assessment Report, Stewart calculated the estimated emissions from the loading operations at the concrete batch plant using emission factors with the units of lb pollutant/ton of material loading. Stewart has recalculated the estimated emissions from the loading operations using the units as specified in AP-42 for each emission factor. The correct emission factor units are detailed in Table 4. STEWART ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, LLC Weld County Commissioners Weld County Department of Planning Page 6 of 13 July 20, 2015 The calculations have been revised to reflect 90 percent of operations as central mix and 10 percent of operations as truck mix and have utilized emission factors with the correct units. The revised estimated emissions are detailed in Table 4. Table 4 — Revised Estimated Emissions from Ready-Mix Plant using Corrected E.F. Units and Split between Central Mix and Truck Mix Controlled Emission Controlled Emission Factor Emissions (tpy) Source E.F. Units Type PM PM10 PM PM10 Aggregate transfer* lb/ton material loaded fugitive 0.0069 0.0033 2.3 1.1 Sand transfer* lb/ton material loaded fugitive 0.0021 0.00099 0.7 0.3 Cement unloading to silo lb/ton material loaded point 0.00099 0.00034 0.3 0.1 Cement supp unloading to silo lb/ton material loaded point 0.0089 0.0049 2.9 1.6 Weigh hopper loading* lb/ton of agg and sand fugitive 0.0048 0.0028 1.3 0.7 90% Central mix loading lb/ton of cement and cement agg fugitive 0.0184 0.0055 0.8 0.2 10% Truck mix loading lb/ton of cement and cement agg fugitive 0.098 0.0263 0.4 0.1 *controlled E.F. is not available per AP-42, so uncontrolled E.F. is used for controlled and uncontrolled Fugitive (tpy) 1 5.4 2.5 Point (tpy) 3.2 1.7 Total (tpy) 8.7 4.2 A comparison of the estimated emissions presented in Stewart's Air Assessment report and the revised estimated emissions is shown in Table 5. As shown in Table 5, the revised calculations present a 37 percent decrease in PM emissions and a 28 percent decrease in PM10 emissions than originally estimated. STEWART ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, LLC Weld County Commissioners Weld County Department of Planning Page 7 of 13 July 20, 2015 Table 5 — Comparison of Original Estimated Emissions and Revised Estimated Emissions from Ready-Mix Plant Originally Calculated Revised Controlled Source Controlled Emissions) Emissions2 PM PM10 PM PM10 Aggregate transfer* 2.3 1.1 2.3 1.1 Sand transfer* 0.7 0.3 0.7 0.3 Cement unloading to silo 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.1 Cement supp unloading to silo 2.9 1.6 2.9 1.6 Weigh hopper loading* 1.6 0.9 1.3 0.7 Central mix loading 6 1.8 0.8 0.2 Truck mix loading -- -- 0.4 0.1 *controlled E.F. is not available, so uncontrolled E.F. is used for controlled and uncontrolled Fugitive (tpy) 10.5 4.1 5.4 2.5 Point (tpy) 3.2 1.7 3.2 1.7 Total (tpy) 13.8 5.8 8.7 4.2 1 - Loading accounts for 100% central mix 2- Loading accounts for 90% central mix and 10% truck mix As shown in Table 5, the emissions have actually decreased utilizing the information requested by Dr. Kisker. • Stewart also states that truck traffic and wind erosion are not accounted for. Presumably, the inputs and constraints on this section of the report were at the request of MMM. The movement of heavy trucks around the site will be a large source of fugitive emissions. As shown in Figure 2, Stewart did not account for this in the report. However, in their calculations, they DID assess the impact. Stewart provides no explanation for the omission of fugitive emissions from truck traffic, material transfers, and haul roads in the final assessment of the emissions of this facility. Truck traffic, wind erosion and the movement of heavy trucks around the site and their associated fugitive emissions were not included in the scope of Stewart's Air Emissions Assessment as CDPHE does not consider this in their evaluation for a permit. The presumption that the inputs and constraints on this section of the Air Assessment Report were at the request of MMM is incorrect. This section was not influenced by MMM and is solely the assessment of Stewart. We did assess the impact of fugitive emissions due to vehicle traffic by calculating rough estimates of the emissions from paved and unpaved roads. These calculations completed by Stewart were not included in the report as this was not part of Stewart's scope. These calculations were completed internally and were never finalized; they were not meant to be published or to be included in the Air Assessment report. For inclusion in this letter, Stewart has estimated the emissions from the asphalt operations and ready-mix operations due to vehicle traffic and wind erosion. Emissions from vehicle traffic due to ready-mix operations on the on-site paved roads were estimated using AP-42 Chapter 13, Section 2.1.1 Paved Roads Equation 1. A 30 percent reduction in emissions was estimated for use of a street sweeper as proposed by STEWART ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS , LLC Weld County Commissioners Weld County Department of Planning Page 8 of 13 July 20, 2015 MMM. Using AP-42 Chapter 13, Section 2.5.1 Industrial Wind Erosion Equation 4, it was determined that the wind erosion potential is negligible. Emissions from vehicle traffic due to asphalt and asphalt recycling operations on the on-site paved and unpaved roads were estimated using AP-42 Chapter 13, Section 2.1.1 Paved Roads Equation 1 and Section 2. 1.2 Unpaved Roads Equation la, respectively. A 30 percent reduction in emissions was estimated for use of a street sweeper on paved roads (AP-42), and a 70 percent reduction in emissions was estimated for use of mag-chloride on unpaved roads. This mag- chloride reduction was reference in the technical paper, The Effect of Salting with Magnesium Chloride on the Concentration of Particular Matter in a Road Tunnel (2007) authored by Aldrin, Haff, and Rosland . Using AP-42 Chapter 13, Section 2.5. 1 Industrial Wind Erosion Equation 4, it was determined that the wind erosion potential is negligible. Using the facility site plans as a basis, the vehicle traffic emissions for paved and unpaved roads were determined. With the exception of a short stretch of road leading to the asphalt recycling portion of the asphalt plant, all roads on site are paved. Therefore, unpaved road emissions were calculated for this short stretch leading to the asphalt recycling operations, and only paved vehicle traffic emissions were calculated for the asphalt and ready mix operations. These results are shown in Table 6. The estimated controlled emissions due to vehicle traffic for all operations are presented in Table 6. AERSCREEN was not used to estimate the dispersion of the particulate emissions due to vehicle traffic as it is not prudent to apply AERSCREEN to emissions not being released under the specific parameters detailed in the AERSCREEN input file (stack height, building location, etc.). Compliance with fugitive emission limits is demonstrated by not exceeding the production limits and by following the particulate emissions control plan, both part of the APCD permit. Table 6— Estimated Controlled Emissions due to Vehicle Traffic PM10 Operation PM2.5 E.F. PM2.5 PM10 E.F. Emissions (lb/VMT) Emissions (toy) (lb/VMT) (tpy) • Asphalt — Paved 0.14 1.3 0.56 5.2 Asphalt Recycle — Paved 0.14 6.8 0.56 • 27.6 Asphalt Recycle — Unpaved 0.43 1.0 4.33 10.3 Ready-Mix — Paved Roads 0.14 1.8 0.56 7.4 These values have been computed using AP-42 equations and have been checked with CDPHE modeling equations for accuracy. Therefore, these numbers are justified from a regulatory perspective. 3. Problem #3 — Incorrect Plume Dispersion Analysis - Maximum Impact • When asked directly about the hourly asphalt plant capacity in a meeting with members of the CLR-34 Neighborhood Assn. on Tuesday, June 2nd, Mr. Hagerman replied somewhat vaguely, but stated that he "thought" it was 500 tons per hour. Similarly, when I asked this same question on January 27th, at the MMM Open House that announced this project, I was told that it was between 450 and 500 tons per hour. The hourly capacity used in the calculations was 303 tons per hour. Stewart adds the emissions from an STEWART ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS , LLC Weld County Commissioners Weld County Department of Planning Page 9 of 13 July 20, 2015 additional 75.82 tons/hour of recycled asphalt (378.82 total tons per hour) but this still falls far short of the actual hourly capacity of as much as 500 tons per hour. While this is an easy correction to apply since it amounts to simply multiplying all of the projected outputs by a factor of (500/378.82)=1.32, this 30% underestimate of the emissions calls the entire AERSCREEN portion of the report into question. Stewart calculated the hourly asphalt plant capacity based upon information provided by MMM. The state will permit this facility based on the annual emissions from the facility, not hourly emissions. It is possible that the facility can reach the 500 tph capacity, but the facility will be limited by the State of Colorado APCD to the annual production and the emissions associated with the annual production. All permit limits are set on annual production, not on hourly production. Stewart strongly disagrees that this discrepancy in hourly capacity calls the entire AERSCREEN portion of the Air Assessment report into question because although the facility will be capable of operating at 500 tph, the facility will be limited by the APCD to the annual production rate. The hourly rates of 500 tph of the asphalt plant will be sporadic and outside of normal operations. This will be limited by the amount of asphalt that can leave the facility by truck. At a maximum, the plant capacity will be limited to a few hours per day. The air permit that will be issued by the APCD will limit asphalt production based on the annual process limitation (tpy), not an hourly capacity, per Regulation No. 3, Part B, II.A.4, therefore, the hourly rate of emissions is not considered as part of this report. • Although the HAPs and most of the criteria pollutants will remain below most of the threshold values for likely health hazards, as Stewart correctly states, one component of the emissions that is of particular concern, and should therefore be examined closely, is PM2.5, particulates that are 2.5 microns and smaller. The EPA as well as other health related agencies have determined that even modest concentrations of PM2.5 can cause not only chronic health effects, but, if high enough, they can actually initiate cardiac events and strokes. In fact, the EPA lowered the criteria for chronic exposure to 12 pg/m3, and there is evidence that even that value may not be sufficiently conservative for sensitive individuals. The estimated particulate matter emissions from the asphalt facility (from both new and recycled asphalt operations), calculated using AP-42 guidelines, are shown in Table 7. Particulate matter is released from the drum dryer, plant load-out, and silo filling. Table 7 — Particulate Emissions from Asphalt Facility Total Emissions Drum Dryer Plant Load-Out Silo Filling Criteria Pollutant Emissions (tpy) Emissions (tpy) Emissions (tpy) from Asphalt Facility (tpy) Total PM 4.86 0.12 0.13 5.11 Total PM 10 1.46 0 0 1.46 PM2.5 1.02 0.12 0.13 1.27 Emissions from plant load-out and silo filling are considered fugitive, therefore, the emissions are not included in the AERSCREEN analysis. The PM10 and PM2.5 emissions from the drum dryer were used to estimate the 24-hr and annual PM2.5 concentrations and the 24-hr PM10 concentration at the property boundary and at the nearest residence for comparison to NAAQS values. These comparisons are shown in Tables 8, 9, and 10. STEWART ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS , LLC Weld County Commissioners Weld County Department of Planning Page 10 of 13 July 20, 2015 The tables show: the estimated PM10 24-hr concentrations at the property boundary and nearest residence are well below the 24-hr PM10 NAAQS level; the estimated PM2.5 24-hr concentration at the nearest residence is below the 24-hr PM10 NAAQS level; and the estimated PM2 .5 annual concentration at the nearest residence is equal to the 24-hr PM10 NAAQS level. It is important to note that AERSCREEN is a model that produces estimates of the worst-case 1-hr concentrations and includes conversion factors to estimate worst-case 3-hour, 8-hour, 24-hour and annual concentrations. AERSCREEN is intended to produce concentration estimates that are equal to or greater than the estimated produced by AERMOD. Further evaluation will be conducted by Trinity Consultants utilizing AERMOD. CDPHE will not issue a permit until Martin Marietta demonstrates compliance with NAAQS. Table 8 — PM10 24-hr Impacts Max AERSCREEN PM10 Location 24-hr Im act u m Background Total PM10 24-hr PM10 p ( g/ 3} PM10 (ug/m3) (ug/m3) NAAQS (ug/m3) Asphalt Ready-Mix Property Boundary 30 57 21 108 150 Nearest Residence 26 44 21 L 91 150 Table 9 — PM2.5 24-hr Impacts Max AERSCREEN PM2.5 Background Total PM2.5 24-hr PM2.5 Location 24-hr Impact (ug/m3) PM2.5 (ug/m3) (ug/m3) NAAQS (ug/m3) Asphalt Ready-Mix Property Boundary 20.7 8.6 7.9 37.2 35 Nearest Residence 18.2 6.7 7.9 32.7 35 Table 10 — PM2.5Annual Impacts Max AERSCREEN PM2.5 Background Total PM2.5 Annual Location Annual Impact (ug/m3) ( g/ } (ug/m3} PM2.5NAAQ5 PM2.5 u m3 Asphalt Ready-Mix (ug/m3) Property Boundary J 3.5 1.4 7.9 12.8 12 Nearest Residence 1 3.0 1.1 7.9 12.0 i 12 Overall, Dr. Kisker over estimated the amount of particulate matter due to using longer hours than permitted, higher production rates than permitted, and uncontrolled emissions rather than the controlled emissions per the permit application. 4. Problem #4 - Inaccurate assessment of the emissions at the fence line and nearby properties • The calculated concentrations of the criteria pollutants and HAPs are reported for distances from the emission stack that supposedly correspond to the property fence line and the nearest residence, reported by MMM to be 900 feet and 1350 feet, respectively. Stewart used standard AERSCREEN values of 95.52 and 75. 16 pg/m3, respectively, for the fence line and the nearest residence at 900 feet, which is 274 meters, the ACTUAL AERSCREEN value is approximately 162 pg/m3, rather than the reported 95.52pg/m3. Similarly, at the 1350 ft. distance, 411 meters, the actual AERSCREEN baseline is about 139 pg/m3. Dr. Kisker is correct that the property boundary distance of 900 feet converts to 274 meters and the nearest residence distance of 1,350 feet converts to 411 meters. The previous measurements of 95.52 ug/m3 at STEWART ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS , LLC Weld County Commissioners Weld County Department of Planning Page 11 of 13 July 20, 2015 property line and 75.16 ug/m3 at nearest residence were reported in error. The AERSCREEN values that should have been used for calculating the dispersion of pollutants from the asphalt operations and ready- mix operations are listed in Table 11. These values presented in Table 11 are general values yielded from the AERSCREEN model by assuming a stack emission rate of 1g/sec; therefore, they do not apply to a specific air pollutant. These values are applied to the actual emission rate of each pollutant to estimate the unique dispersion patterns of each pollutant. Table 11 — Corrected AERSCREEN Values Max 1 hr Concentration (ug/m3) Location Asphalt Ready Mix Property Boundary — 274 m 159.3 281.1 Nearest Residence — 411 m 139.7 217.2 Though higher than previously presented, the estimated maximum annual concentrations for all HAPs, with the exception of formaldehyde, are within EPA Regional Screening Levels for resident ambient air, which corresponds to 1 in 1,000,000 excess cancer risk in the case of carcinogens, and the chronic reference concentration in the case of noncarcinogenic risk. ( Note: the chronic reference concentration is defined as "An estimate (with uncertainty spanning perhaps an order of magnitude) of a continuous inhalation exposure to the human population (including sensitive subgroups) that is likely to be without an appreciable risk of deleterious effects during a lifetime"). Estimated formaldehyde concentrations are below the noncarcinogenic screening level at the property boundary and at the nearest residence, but above the carcinogenic screening level at both locations. Because the estimated level at the nearest residence is less than 10 fold the carcinogenic SL, it corresponds to an excess risk of less than 1 in 100,000. This risk is often viewed as acceptably low in environmental health assessments, particularly when only one chemical contributes appreciably to risk. Based on the AP-42 emission factor of 0.0031 lb/ton and the plant capacity of 450,000 tpy, the estimated emission rate of formaldehyde is 0.70 tpy. In contrast, we have provided stack test results (April 24, 2014) for the Taft Hill facility that show formaldehyde to actually be emitted closer to 0.13 tpy. Therefore, actual formaldehyde emissions are expected to be within the carcinogenic screening level. In addition, the Highway 34 facility will be adding activated carbon to the control measures, which was not included in the original calculation. The comparison to EPA screening levels is shown in Table 12. STEWART ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, LLC Weld County Commissioners Weld County Department of Planning Page 12 of 13 July 20, 2015 Table 12— Comparison of EPA Screening Levels to Maximum Annual Concentrations RSL - Resident Ambient Air AERSCREEN Estimated Max Annual Concentrations (ug/m3) Pollutant (TR=1E-6, HQ=1) (ug/m3) Noncarcinoge Property Boundary Nearest Residence Overall Max Carcinogenic SL nic SL 274 m 411 m 155 m Benzene 0.36 31 0.30 0.26 0.33 Ethylbenzene 1.1 1000 0.18 0.16 0.20 Formaldehyde 0.22 10 2.36 2.07 2.63 Hexane n/a 730 0.70 0.61 0.78 Toluene n/a 5200 0.11 0.10 0.13 Xylene n/a 100 0.15 0.13 0.17 5. Problem #5 - Omission of assessment of dispersion from the concrete plant • Although the provided information from Stewart indicated that an AERSCREEN analysis was done for the concrete batch plant, this was omitted from the report supplied as part of the USR. Stewart completed an AERSCREEN analysis on the ready-mix batch plant and all files pertaining to this analysis were made available. The results of the AERSCREEN analysis were not included in the Air Emissions Assessment report as the modeling portion of the report focused on the dispersion of CO and HAPs, neither of which are emitted from the ready-mix batch plant. AERSCREEN was applied for PM10 and PM2.5 emissions. The results are presented in Tables 8, 9, and 10. • To assess the impact of this emission, a similar approach is taken as before: values from the standard calculation are determined from the data and then scaled to the "sensitive receptor" position using the production rate and EF values. in this case, the baseline value at 1350 (411 meters) feet is 215 lg/m3, resulting in a projected concentration of PM2.5 of about "7 /g/m3, assuming a production rate of 300 cu. Yds. per hour as used previously by Stewart. The projected rate of particulate emissions, especially PM2.5, is expected to violate the National Ambient Air Quality Standard at the nearest residence. AERSCREEN was applied for PM10 and PM2.5 emissions from both the asphalt facility and the ready-mix facility. The results are presented in Tables 8, 9, and 10. 6. Problem #6 - Misleading description of the health impacts of PM2.5 • Dr. Stewart (in response to a suggestion that a network of Air Quality index (AQI) sensors might be used to monitor and warn the adjacent properties of excessive particulate pollution) asserted that using the EPA's Air Quality Index was subject to competing contributions from other species such as ozone, dismissing the idea that it could, in fact be used to observe changes due to the activities at the MMM site. However, the EPA does not agree with Stewart, and offers a guideline for particulate pollution only. It's more convenient to use STEWART ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS , LLC Weld County Commissioners Weld County Department of Planning Page 13 of 13 July 20, 2015 the AQI as a guideline to health impacts since it can be calculated only for the small particulates, PM2.5 and PM10. The best measures for emission compliance at this facility are the PM emission calculations. As previously discussed, the maximum probable PM emissions were computed with AP-42 emission factors and EPA's AERSCREEN. These values are further confirmed with the CDPHE permit models, which conclude that the Stewart emissions calculations are in compliance and conservative. Furthermore, Martin Marietta will need to submit, and CDPHE will need to review, the final application and permit before the facility can operate. AQI is not applicable in this situation, as a number of factors contribute to this number for any given area. The AQI is reported by regulatory entities, and is the result of combined emissions for any given area. The areas are normally a population of 350,000 or more. This would be a wide spread area, not a specific concentrated area such as proposed by Dr. Kisker. Therefore, the AQI assessment run by Dr. Kisker is not an appropriate determination of the plant's emission levels. Please contact us if you have any further questions regarding the information provided regarding the Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development." Sincerely, STEWART ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, LLC David R. Stewart, PhD, PE President and CEO STEWART ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS , LLC Diana Aungst Subject: FW: Attendee lists Attachments: IHE-E Attendees and Speakers at PC Meeting. pdf; IHE-W Attendees and Speakers at PC Meeting. pdf Original Message From: Dave Kisker 'mailto:dave. kisker�gmai(. com] Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 2:21 PM To: Kristine Ranslem Subject: Attendee lists Kris, There are a few more from the outlying areas, but unless you really need them, I'm not going to bother. Between these two lists, I have at least 70 folks that we represented. Now a couple of details. I believe that the IHE-W is completely obvious because the residents are named independently. So, you can see who attended according to our records, and , who spoke, either with CLR-34 or independently. (I assume the CLR-34 speakers count among those that we represent. . .) The IHE-E list is more confusing, I guess. They way that it was done is that the residents, if more than one, appear on the same line. Then, the columns indicate how many of those residents attended, and then how many of the attendees spoke independently. So, for example if it's a "2" and a " 1 " that means that 2 residents attended and one spoke. However, at this point, I don't know which one spoke independently. Presumably, your records show that. Similarly, a "1 " and a " 1 " means that one person attended and spoke. If you need us to clarify this, we can do so, of course. This is the way it was provided to me, however, so I hope it works. There are some other people (about 5) that I know for sure attended and did not speak, so if we need to chase those down also, we can. Just let me know. Thanks for your patience and help. Dave Dave Kisker My philosophy toward retail : "Be easy to do business with. If you make it difficult for me to give you money, I won't. . ." EXHIBIT 11 Ica_ O1IGYEa A02 Olt*EG[)GYEG4a EAWG M EEC 0& ti ?j JAwciviviAASZZYLI tj .41 2n 6 6 :ZSYFZY,OZ1flG ce6j 11B2cit/WAittaifil 6 6 ZSZAEE,OZYA8Atm6C, EG cj j 6®°i Yath'®d 6 6 OYEGr ZY,®ZYAiE®®tiG caj ®ZOvAYE6®t t 6 VtcnUATZ2IRENITMti tj se i u •" ? ZAE t 6 ^ KEai .B[ss"YEA cE6®ZwwAY£b®1 t 6 AZ MIA?Jat:6YttLfl A0v tj tEj Q 2oniiMal t 6 CA WAY,[7 Actrecl SIG cj t6I Ati Airs t t OAvd,®itlammLY1• sA cj E®ZwAYfK®t 6 V V V V V V V V / A V /. V q V A a OZGEEGL df ZSYI 'ZYtA cj tcadiCiaZ1'[ ?:. d 6 pan Y C A1•G tj xj j q ZIu 6 V V V V V A A V V V V V' OZZfGa 1 A7.®�ZYY�G tj 9 e® JAd"C-�Q E 6 El thi ®aAY cej*w'≥ wAYEtG[mi 6 &IV0/1EN tnamAai cdtilltcrisiaaffla 6 a V V A V V V V MI V V V V ' °aIGa,C A E' ?EA tj j EglIE W I ≥AE 6 ' daII > IEP BI' IZdZEAJ ZY tj j j 2®'tAE ZZIEfZAE 6 ttragotaix&Acw2i4AttitpArta tj ex€®°tAUJ2≥nz≥AE 6 V / A V A V V V / V V :ZSYE1ZY ,® GdZdAS tj t :.s Z iaro& 6 <Gato Z°tal®®Aidli tj al ®a�ZAE 6 >0GY,©ZSY ca gletitaftla 6 >211,ingkrZ3BIZILAJAE cet®ZwvvA?tt s 6 V V V V V A V V wN V V V V D Ad2E,C11AzapI? A&Y tj j 66N AEL ZZl[1ZAE 6 V A V //V A V V A V V V V V V V -- D Ms�(Gn,[ 1ZOGY®OAYC. tj 9 j ® ZA_E 6 E urtwauvirbEnft4arit tj 640 203211M u _ 6 EZIAU,E YEA ce d Ai tA®t 6 K IG612G,©AL tj t :iv Zflg1d i 6 via[ AYEI D AN5cc . tj szeimalistlitut2AE 6 dAZ?it 3Y OZ1Z1 tEtet 6 d?YYAu0Z1EmA°it tj CEO°tAdMIE!ZAE 6 dlw 2iali Ac 'lvJ 11 1-prfcl Z0g11dAJ 6 t S4 AUGdL'IAEZYI3D[ .iSas??6 c0x61ili cvazsf[tId 6 t S g.AUGdOAEZY®®S dE.WO ceketEitalazggEma 6 O G11E®sAAYAimM 12E® *6AGu tj tc6Q Z 1d49u t O ts'YOm GaDoZG ccEH AL IATht t OZEA£UC ..Acwat?? cc6Finit: ZYazs1A�®d t D AliE2S> C A ®r Gc °ttY tj tes 2e1 u t YzAotigilinDIRP81 cetaAithAmt t ^E6 ii My [ tE®eJ`Sff tj Q6e4 2€0160Cst t V V V V V A V V V V V "C Gdx Ad1� :AY t c j E E ClA.Q h A®I t ^ZflDG£,®E®EE AYEI cemZv"vvvAYE6®i t t �AuktiaZSYivatEwitik tj cej ®°tA£UZZt[ZZAE t t 2atanAnDarikara c9 t®ZwwAY£5 ®1- t I is>. .. 'z S%. -v-- i . x — —"• • r 1-1,' c - - idSR:( c. , --t 10% . J. __ _.y ---4 3antaill R. j -� k _.._ 43 lQi ---) • N4 w. b Z -ji — L— -.) '- ' isirt•-v t" g dp tr., _a. 4),, d t -sL. .. i ---.t y * _._.) : 5, et4 , -1 •-1 NM, M Q ,.sty 0 1 (z) e; , .7- C ?} C .> G C,, c o� V 1 ,e LC �- + ` ° ' `�gi J ) ) L ? T. P--4% ., I V) 4 F-1L; 1, :e :1 _ t.:; ) -a ; mss Na Ee. ` q C 1‘ N--- _.1. 1 4 C CC it e ITI tt * / 6 r* ' .1) c O air -4- '----,....e. " (-0-7• 1 --7 msc—' I\ s '. , --e•J 141 ;;;- L.) ;-.1 - -- 2 . ‘ \ - `14 ages , i id�; z _ ej tom; NV\ ` a a_z.c •Nt • --nt st‘z,,,ii NiN .) 6\ -\ A t i- �.. ,.. it. `..) \ V Z L /1 ilti:7 CC ;C2. 3 . -3 mi - . , \)% c, ,, _ _....t h LIJ 4%1 3 YN4 /40 (A )-siv) Lji -- \r, c) -4 in '' '• Q r tic'vi ILI O ge, cc z I-2 e i a ,0 ..1), No. (-- .,.? r_ ..\ j--N v, sz-- �t/1- ‘ u , . tNI ._.. S} Q 'O a -- �V V C) sa CU O. i\ E NO c., m ��-' �` r. -.) 2 Ni, I C) , ,.., E y Eli (/� Cf L J % 'P ` J^.frac \-- _-\) .. \ Li cA. P .-- t-c) 1/4^ \frj frp °huh\ •-) 4-, s'i 4 --; \ 1 r \L:. a: 15 c- - • :IL - -, ' .... , .? /1 < 4-. . %j I) (6 tA es li,Lif) a-SZ. ]; Or , VI . .` ,.6 _ - `1�_ /-mac `� \4_ 4. „E-mic ``y' - „ i * . F c 2 . Net .,, e___,J. -T %.1‘) 4 t' c :I .`:::: C-‘3 :a. — c- ) q ---.? -C-` li : 'JR c IA LAJ f:,. 0 Et \ \\!- ,,,___, t--- . , V.) -----a __ _ ts si L-1-12 jt ,--. ) '< ,_5„* 1 , Le_ ,:;4 (rid Zv....Alzik c) -AT:: Cel. .., -, c- iciii, \*\ ,i, a Z I N c vii) . , 1.§ R A1 J _ \ v Lj 1 •{1.L ' 3 % , .J •A ya., • J , �� V r. , v 1 i J 5 '- (— -f . _ _.- V l ` t jam\ r' c.I ' • -' i 7 CC N 1 c.N. - V Cnrt *t . L A ..t. V (/‘ • f ,,k . :1•(nu) o N 6 \. - I Li 8 , , 1 i. .,--- I MTh I) H %nee Z r•••••:4 st i.% al O VS Q c.-fa a) a E 0 V 13 C M ci a (a S a\P - r ` . c i. r.C + .f 1. ''2 .. . .1 '•) 1 5 L k4) i .� I. .'ewe f 1. >ft vb. ) to) )v N - 04 V Ca al aJ V, Z IS\ C : IS Q ` 1 -J ' 9 \ •c J "` v • , INN N,,t .7-,-, . -J x e\--d c" --. ) - .. `744, (--4 4) . —6 tr-N`t:- Z .4 ‘ •.1 , '"' c 4,') .) g -) r g) . %t , ...\ `N M .-1\ __ - - — - \ - ,,, • t4 "--.. Lir\ -$4 V Ch. N A jC) * ' - :;:' ' \\ c -. .‘ 11:41 Z : j'%• --:: •-._, 1 H _a. 0 0_ si.44 IL) ''' IST- - \ \...N• \ . ' er SL \ t"."' Q > 1 ' . ) OC) R U h `j U"' �--) fir-V1 i U 113 �-- (' - 1- J i1C: Th ‘Th1 <t - � _0 E (8 - .. \ \i^. .1\ r lel re zc--% 1-\ 6. O . ., c _12 5, relen ,-,,I, (>4‘ b_. ,\),_ (-NA r— crt..., r u, ......., cH , --)s, t _ 7; 62,_ is, 1. en) ‘ -' -e--.) 0 -0 c ra i\ ,.ra et > \ O V / "` c li. .J d. ::th I-->-- -Av4 --1- -t--• at C , t&,, J iii 1 'v V 8 L.... a' -st Nil ,-- - -1-7- ‘,, , .- \. ,, \r e t'••,., i., . .1 :Li!) r--- . �! -75-. ar ----44Q1 t;i%:-.) --21,Hs riti ..... ...... -O ..::, Q. V .^lam \1/2 ., ctW o lj i ` ci • r,'s in u., 0 4 !4 2 c • / , - IN: .cc, \'' -..( 1,4 a z ° U -n kn4— dr\. --. U rt) _____ 0 Lk (;:- '- 4-> sa ;sr, o n DC V\ ) ,,,,,,i i C O Si V ti �, O .3 .i t _ /� `j i f` V v c1 a, O `^-1 _ 12 c .J •GT k t • `-- ,,,9 El?. ts...O -3 IV \Th- -)?- k-, \A t' ,,V) ^r V _S.) NC) c r---)1._ cs.:It .-,- , ri.:" S., I ,,,.. a s :41 j 11 4 A �- _ -~ -4- ` , , N 11 , k., k_k j , ' 'Si �� } r J �J ` //�� -0 Id -! ` \ CC NI -J ,� V Q- ` ^i (' N. N ^ , (` i v -7 / r co in -,- ,. . , _,C. 4 (..., ., —t c„,„\ peis _eat .....,z4 ......- .....) 0.4) - -,„- (.... ..- -„„1„‘ CL "Il‘' - 1 ri, ) , r5 Al et Cis, ‘)' d /94. ,) + Ur- .ii ---e-..-.- I . st 7--.A, 1 .1 `,:ik :Y. , - • Cos"4. - ,s --- S u r; C _,` 1 , • ► ` 1y}� L - '1 Z % = N • `� + �� y - Z cu tan il 3 _T ,N 5__t_ z,:),j 'ci 7 cr, Se LSI LA IAJ 0 O 1/4-‘kj or\_ ,-. N n tie), N. \ 4,3 c) 0 0.,-, it- \-- kNe )icb --__ n- 1/4-c r duo . z c) , do- I` 1 ;'-‘, 1.1 1) f‘I‘V I 'Cr In :), .) .-2. :IC \C) ,,,,. iS ‘,..si -.4, "- ..: '--c: -a..— a) a) a E -1-- La C :� ...--%e- ---i E a >. t L . _ _ Itj ) • C k/1 ''' cr9 '—';4 C\--) lc Ct) 0. —tt e 34 ‘'. -,,-• - ,,--(1 , —41 tis 0 % ,‘ se..„") "`s—M__.< - .,_) ' 4 f__ --i- > „, ,. :., , , , ,.. • ; 4 ; kii , G d � 3 tiJ )3/4.1/4 .-4-, _ 1 J _ n 1�' � � � \, 0 tr) r bo ri: ocz. a ,„-_,, ts/J.), t - (5--a gilt ta hc `N 'Jr)) i--- t9 O Z c>z .c) . . .' ilk MD "4 A a tE S 1 , CCitiC am \_4 CJ \ic:. ___._ cAr 1 7_,.,4, 44 , ...,,, tile_ N\ . i•-• , 5.:-) , ,..—. ,. -,:es 3/4. , . i c\--) ---ck-4\; c ')-c , _..c. Q , ,,,c. . -. s, x \- \ v._, L__,, \( > ,„ , tp ( O , --d ‘ ° -i --g, --. 4 , - --‹ 4— -t O a ), ' , p rs ---=-1 --,-..._. tc ,k,c cc sic,o ,t) 1Na iv ..i, s( \J ? I---2 a U +cs, i \ g 1 CC S. 1- --.' cZ.. IL' ka ,:\\ -- U 4,71 Li — .lal , .,,,,,!, r_ sQ..,, itI. S�� z 4t2 d . \tom (�--<3 -_ - O CS- -J► Cal v 3 a �, O a O0 N be C N •�n V (The I 0 tc ( .! '-44) v a) a E O U act Cu c E ru C I_ ^�1 O ; r , =I , L c,,ii t4 4T 1s. _ 1 0 1— ':—'',.. C, —C-- 1— c\ f , „, .., a .44 C a? ,..3 R---"k.,. c--, :t- 2 ri, _ A . \\ S. (� .- 1 SN. °' a, , '- N C .)- 4-- , .J lc. iV\ --- .1 �-� a 0 C 0C v , V / Cl �3 �, � 0 O N t� 0 ec c nt. ') --. 0 VC ti o ti h^` s.` S -�` N� r1 _3 i + d,1 `YN--o; \-; \"' LC 4 a , ,-/ es/ 2, ar,,, ,,,,, i , ‘)7Jj._ F W r i-3 } cfr k � ti . z Q if, x' 4-. ., `• J� p E _ - r Z °' L 3 �` r� m °' 3-' fit' it'll cc z Q.) a n. E 0 u -Q c co ai E( - o c S J .� • 1 a � A rTh\s\ \- ' 1) Z eSsi t. Ttt - PiCe � - 1/41 0 4,,4 a- P\t a g rk) -NC 1 4 -a IC.1 t) I V- -2 si Lu 0 kV -t- 4a . ac L v) LuC u re ec2 a Z e :' t ,. c C (T 8 a) 'D't ).‘c\- ' N L U C i CC _ , � 4 a q r:_, (2, 3 6 -p—j- .. sci \>• & --, FA ) 4 \ \%"---, 4-0 U MI - ti U I , \ k) L.Ne _, in •i C v o ( ) w o �i� t" N C FE d , 'V m f r � w Q a � fa a) a Z. E 0 8 C CU a E m id.S \ � �1 On --_ .L . - N (/ v a ++CU j ` , 3 6 ' , \ - %-....:Nii � Wi ..ric:-y----L'i w OO 4. ( \t} ., ---r 4 2 c -Nr 1 A , „a Z , CO k. V - i vJ M NNo C � � s - DO ti N) \t' . $ kso° ---,1 ti 4 e !ic K. . ': .1 c-s \ e 0 a ' �. () 0_, Uco '\: - J r w t-�. �` `� o U 3 7, , ., ,,,z . ka) 1, • ' N• . Q cP ; . V Y Q a.) Q.!O ai �` u Z 3 o I `>° .e w Mteu W z m tN ( . fi w �' o N $ v� (i (3V J T �. m i. E O u C to a) E to C L ^^�� O 1J a � ` � ---44 ,Q..) o P N4 o a)-I n--. 3 \pc.) ' fri4 d \i�a -jea W W 0 ?, 4 ` ' _G FQ a t• N W g V - z-I .��f��'' < o �t \\ 1 V � a 2 r rt ..), • N 1.\) "9i RI, t-f°' " t -Lfi 1/4_ Lc tj 7 --- ci It) le to, t* (1) (‘d 10 st -1---- r6 L • k . , k, „ ,$) n 0 60 :. -) (-3 (..,5 Ca rTh 09 \i '71.-1 ', ` Ks.> 3 .6 kti) C, /I ✓'treal ( p'. gy C , i Q N, ,t, c,, C 4 4-- 7 ' M Ci C a .? ,-1 _:: ct 1- -1-O L ', .. 7,c; Q., v Q Li t a) ‘ ..r) m n ‘.., ID , 4 a l ,., ,) 0 vi 415d _t ' ' ‘11' VI R . . ) -r- Ct C i c ‘ 1 ' c-CW ci Q2' , _. .7. -c let - --. ccl, -T g% . tO - -- \C\ 3 71: N \ 1 C e -.--) 0 ? tik S d ;: -15 \ ) *k2 ar \ .\-\ Iii.th . ' 3/4 o \-11 c - .\. -,t' l %) & J A 1 •T'l N- A ( j 1 = & -14- . —: Q) 1 7-. L5- ' --1 ';'%N r' - Li) 41 i -nr --Z -Q (<1' u e_3 A \,. 1-- t is a p =-.< s- ? ihil y• 'IA- t\ cc 5 --‘-. . 6___ _ ,;-)1 AY, ( V g 1 . .. -14 N`(' . -_I - \_‘ c U G, to V' \ a i - Qi ci ts .4I u �. ' Q z in .co cu rJ r a C ;� c c © co rc)t Cr `�' y #' . �') I.Tc t rai FJ, -:91 (< n A4 -" 3 :7- S -.a c-z c- Lij 41. Lvj O (>46 It `'' 9--14;j (-1As % N re NiNs \ts' -; ir\) reS1 cl -9 41 a E O V A C ft E4td ( i `,,C3 , n - I V , . 0 1 \ �� 0 i -•- ,s �� 1, ) .. --�� t n .�- V a G �l Qz V) cl � f I - -� a 3 J 3 �l L j 1 V r1 f ' c %` Z O \ J al 4 e -AL - U.._ c . Sb W .\ 3 (zt; � Ccaic_ ‘ J = .� Ftg . S (� J 17.0 1 (3 y . . L k.: . 3 !c-_:i :s. , C1) 7>„1.1 ,,),5,14 In 7 ,6 s.."% .%1 i C \ i -A`— /CI Rj ..:r) if La ' - rz- N... . a Z _ t-- 1ll \ , a e r % k-- k 'Th u % - 9c 1 T. a ,C,./0 c si re-? v) ,n t: I 1 i < tO e ____ CAA t ei *-{ alg c a \i --6 h --.3 I. --..._ri 1 k .,,i lir 0 a (Z (' )R . _ 9 N cl\- ‘4_. 0 01l ( �-► CSC U CO W X J.) Tb • , : r.; `~~ ---. CC 5%, I , -a ? rj,_ 0 • 1 c� ,, \ 1, _ - Z it!) -2' 4 - , . 0 2. _, e". \/) I; S - —1 :-'° ° .. \ cag . , e — Q -1. z fit- ^', L� , ......) _ W � I~— Ica CC Ern r �% c ,5 N c ,-;(-.6 43 c. ELc O V-oc m a) E. E l 1 .. i < wi (.3 4 4 J r' i s.: u , 4.Jc ‘ . . 1 •Y‘. ' .%) <° \\ 8 u * ‘ 'j t..-- >4) \ 7 Li \I ......0" 8 c 0 la cis. 1,:__-_ ' • V :far! C.P1/4.jc. N ' * •'\-- INA IN • t SO. \e‘ ,sr\ 7 '.\ \11 1-:4? La C) et) g , ;4.. \ , CY. , -----i7,--, - ,0, ___„, cc , A:, J i ; I �1 1 , Y n 4.- y \ ‘; (),_::) "sh, a m 1p 'A /Q 4 v N) 0N 'V n) e 0 0° ,, \R •--, �, ki) 0 k 4 r) Q � n . oc `id q g '`) f\ J ' \ kV 6} V• V 4 r r ' m C4 N P, ''''t: Q 1,1. 4) a ,_ 1 le .W. .. --1 •< .) eg, . . , li 9 c N\ i �a r Nk 5 1 - VI it 3 -4HLI 4 N, :.3 U inc A \, , ,)(N) h kb 1 e. "--0- A ..„, . c_. rs. Ar) ,. ci, ,_\O c\f —\ \ 1 ‘ ---) '. —' -7: 3 k......,„„), ttc\ 1 4 .—t J ± ,t c -- , ',.• ,.., , , kia >t (4°i L- -- ‘ it -' -zt - ss v, 4: ;S CA i ‘C-_, a-0 .%' 1 U 4? _roe' t <- � ( Z El? --1- c- ). 1\ i •-.. eq, is ., , ,- ,, ri c) ,_ I c : kkg Q41), $ ce,, cc V V \% T4 . L 6 s a Li.' v., r2, g Lc) kr P. '9 \_ , c, ---d 43 - k f, --, „ L;:4 N \_CI .\0 ty (e E— cif) i= Z t-• V'' 5 QN CI i k P tr a Mil \ CS CC — EtZL,4,citfc- () H -16Q I a , , CD 4a -a ,--- E N C u c ra a) -A. ,z; Co } „i ,� - es,c , ,) -\- - \i ) •• 1 L A O .2 ,)-cj A 1 ‘--‘ h '1; :4 \. ct) ` �_, CrW i A 4 t > i! V V 1 .. a) ._,,, _. 5:. 3 _ ` S a > -- -c ''� \ — . V \ \ \ s c --4- >-S �` - rA d: --i .z.. --N.-. 31, st-- O % w w I, — t , ce \V UJ o € 2 - - D"--) ,‘.j ct ti C -C a z o - - qtr- (l g. Lf.› t.).) �^ ) trl trt -I ri C Q �' `5rnd be �' ci �- �- c , r _____ --- A 74C i,N. -.- L‘P r-C: dis--------- ---a'N4 - __________ __ ___ SO q) c\C 4? (:), , _a; cre.,, tij 1 C4 ti Oa t - 3 ° � 5 orno °E 0 _..s <J.; 'SI, 8 r ,, ,>, :. ka 1 \-' c A 3 ,- ic ,, r,1 \\ ° ckt• ''Cir il t t-q '. V\ s -r-1 ± Ycc a r tr 7, J. L._ IS 4" ese-C (". Li, e , R- ..- ( : ..,, el cs M el 76t _2. � cSr° C ( ,. - C a .), liN ----::: --. .., CC N v C 0 o 44 X ' V 'rk, U__. \___, S' � �� U tuj gLrk 1Rni_i, sr O --' "e 4 ? \i,4 z IC . . 'MC - j ccd� P. 41:1 � j ,c-< •i0-5 . ---- N.t. O co z w r z _ do 1 t\J ' I rC tr_ \ Q 1.-� a zrry et � N -- ceri ' ' a E , u t C CO y 4 E ---_ _ ra r C ril e O .. _ . 1.4 >1/4 „eks\L c (- 4. C -Thei (� , _ 'a ; `. - V' , ' V - \ •i J \; ,ft-i iN. , \'14 H ___.4 I LI as. c\i `� � - r7--‘ Vv , ve Q,,,,. ...v.--- ,,_)4. 1- . ? p ---s-_, ._ ..� U,. -.-- a z I �11 ._,._ tclIk t 4i--g- --1 W. —CI 4 .::: , ..„ (\ft, ...... , ,i .. S 4,‘ e.) 4,1 ..,1 vn. 77i c � � n r� � q n Th NI V L i • "C ti ,i3 4, 2 , v. 4% I 'NI. \, \ � 9 S S / an A --"- 4:1\ , 3 c-_-: n c- c, _s- .i .__!, -,77: ' • . \rN. ) ' .moo o \ `� O .9 ,..S.U ',' E 4 A CC ?-:. -...\- ..---- . w %L.--‘ t\%-k -- 1 N . LJJ inre, w p 1 t„ r tn V4\.. ) ' ; O 'J, v L oCC Z � Q -a a CU a E O u m E ' . `° c 1 L .fr.o -- \ \ , ) 2 'Y L c. 8 \,- . -' . c, , 6 ,,..,) kNk,„<„, ... Ns i alal 6 t-- i " 3 Ill_tk- , .,A P 41 "CID � \,\:,- w in -,- a - k - cam, . t=- L C (r � C/ j 0 a O C C a-+ ca LLJ CC a) z --- - 0 a a)" z w IH W O Z L nj au 6 c a --L :cu ea o c v w o to w 0 Cr - o .f z - r ai ‘- . 1 _..--te ( •••••.. c 91 ...14.81(1--c- ) U ' — (' —6--- ----) -'1 \\C, r ,) . 1 al j ) • " N Qj q 1 S,,.Ann: n cuo ' j cz cat: c.)0 " >3/4 --..k S4 ,/ 3 n -th Y - vs t a iti L ,/ ~ � \ .1.— 0 . .g, %-1 34 \ , --<1 1/4. \ L, N.,... q) 4 ' i ( ce- il -) 0 .2k A 44k e... ---c-c6) -1 liA:1 -a -_-___ ,jj CC ‘ hiThn. 5 tz , --4 i R to !* OJ -- h h. i r_IN c ) , 021 r N .-- . a._ V-- 7.. _ Q ) - ' Z $' CC 5:. •___ , . 1 , -_,.C ' \\S ...IN ----NJ ----J _4.. c f Li a; Z 2 --k '''--: •13,i_ft, Ns ski: ,_.,. Q 92r.. `,/Z v, -C (ti —, N ` -�., ' (� . c, z 2,, . en s.., 14- N 1%. r:—. v) „ lot `....1 44-. ..._:_, , .. r N) ) (.,, Q "0 °a ri - no N =ome CD ai i. E O u ca ca )• \"N , . e ____ e"i ‘ . .,.' V) , ...z: 0 ---. , 44 co 8 1 di 4-) Th vc. 3; -3 , .� r, ---#..7"7\ ) i Z.:2-. SZ t\ +4 ee\ >‹. •i e4 d 4 N!: QJ CU NJVI W LU O -?-3. .,, ?; r W Q �. s:: l 1 , a Z I - - - - rtc- - o _ w DC w u • V zcu Q o s tin r w N w 0 r d ore Z as '. m N a � a �Cr ' _ a_ O "O C t� C L 4-4 a 1 C LLI cA W 0 a 2 c J Q Z Ow - - V NI It1 C �� 1 ..,_) .)3i m --1 kJ) (/ /,, ''.i $ 1Q a O 4to,P oo b.S. tj<Dn S' f:L__ \ c) ti V ‘ i 0 --3._ (-1. 69: ) j �J CC) ' - 'Z .d `� `J 141 k , h, a : , ,c ,i) (f, \(9 bio_ 1 \\ , ? , c--- ''sj V - _ ,-_.) 1\' pc:c-: .°6 --J31 - Hr-•.;s:$ 71 4-4) 17 4: . c i C ..,, , ',-- < .,-N . ,,.,rr N � J i� � C^ � s ,' J 4 4 ' C -?- r2 Lim -, .,4- 1 ki es/L: - tea ` i -__:,..... L. ; S' ' tc i :-.)_ KO $ .,..C c t__ ---\ I .) C _ O v v �. `� --14 t I \ l--) )St-Pj C . 3 Ij i - 4, . •— j C: --4: 4 gt_ -J. c' . -C) •!. qj %q.t. •fjiz I . CI 4 :, d l may. V ` ) ej '� h _ p r\ • 1 CI . , 1 i i c° 3 NI line) ov- z cp rt., fa__ w In o v r - r `! ' Q ' ` NI !!`fi�n., Cs �- m r' f-, m r a) 44 a) r a E 0 U so C to a7 E to 1 ✓ o � . 1 la 81 E < ,r\ --ci: • -E- •- .1 -.-:., -3 4\fi .___ ____..- -k c-. - ---.1/4) c - s_)' ,) (.. - . c $ \N -C. . (7,, iz .4 :1 ( I < 4 ___.s--1 ( t\ c...a)•- , iril -. �- q 3 ----e _ 2 -:5• __ ci \)\,gi . ymi vi irc'? erQ) ---S /3 7.--7,<, i 4 uj p ‘t. ----„, te„..r4 2,- ..,... ‘.. , , 1/4, , , Jr -3 Q4 ----- ._ 5 t-- ..) s- � • C - r _- ice a 4kki 6 .- 1 � :, , -7---i-r) `f` ; ,J.. -• c , -- 9 ` -_I \su u ' r >C i1 • .). O 4 , ,-) „ V S r ✓✓ a 1 k iv) L Oki � 7a �� _T, > \ ; A y i 0 A I `-i i ' , =O _2 ---4i Q +., ` DNA: ,ten \..) ",k) te k , 1 . 4g u cu- CI' LLi ......— ct >:1 \i/lOt\ks ,1 W 'mac .t . N es•NICC V) vs W O j 4 I 4_,4e ..,'.) 1 73 M 'C. .' kr N. . R /I) . L1J �, -' icl Z a a) 2. E O c ru nu E it 0 c li .r c C O r v--��O. L. i----•3 NBC � - :12 i Qt-I\ I r) $ „...--4 N Id Eiji '-- `Y K --. ' N , - • 3 - to ' .vi W d 'Z � `- a 2 c , �, o Mk- Vii: . w Q .c `. s \ 'r` El. z � , %._ C . rl --,..c , ---; _, ______. ,.. , I;si & l * N , .., , —..1 % cceel Ai \--- ---t--,./ .,%) ...,\) i , ...._ ‘ 2 --5 r‘ -1 O r , Y_ )) \-• 17) J 16 c- j kn ! k, i -- 1/4 0 '' nn 0 _..._ -Th- ><H\1 3\. . ../ t, no IA 3,, , .7-;<C k 1 it c O wd)k S. -- -)��/ e , (.. ', \., " N - Z/1 e 1 V -.Lc. .1 N c --""••••..J CC RI O e ? 'N ig C...) M kV (..) , I; Le ca-C \ H 3___. R ,e' ,. W to -_L I (\ \ " 1 IV-i • 4_ 43Z \‘..11 \ 0 / -. Q to L, ,4 ' NZ N. Sm L0 cu au Lr i cc m r ,=, rte, O ` bo \ �.. Cf 0O C\ I- a) n. _ _ E o C I r5 v a) E N.- 2VP 3 �, 2 c - l - �� a '._ 1 (v c ot. -�- `. • v , ' '"" C ‘tit (-NZ a \,, \, .4.0 C) __,., I : I. : 4, O • J 3 . , r .Cl �1 `J �� ' N. P c\ •--) Z IC) 3 ). �' la a) 3 L. ..iji Q 1--. w I.,‘ ...),, D--,.....<, -a _--c--, _____y •- . --,i.. ow 0 a g c -- . U..) qQ r+ v 1 a z {111 �� Indianhead West HOA Member Roster. January 2014. Member Name " _ ;' meeting Spoke Independently Spoke with CLR-34 'Chrisman Roxanne 6713 Apache Rd X X Collins Sharon 27811 Hopi Trail X X Meusch Renata 27647 Hopi Trail X X Piraino Jim 27660 Hopi Trail X X Schlotter Melanie 27700 Hopi Trail X X Wilson Craig 27790 Hopi Trail X X Wingerson Eric 27601 Hopi Trail X X Chrisman Michael 6713 Apache Rd X X Kisker Dave 6681 Apache Rd X X Kisker Ellen 6681 Apache Rd X X Oplinger Gary 27687 Hopi Trail X X Bogart Ronda 6645 Apache Rd X Flynt DeVonna 6818 Apache Rd X Flynt Jim 6818 Apache Rd X Hoskinson Shirley 27701 Hopi Trail X Hoskinson (Smith) Rodney 27701 Hopi Trail X Kroeger Jeff 6751 Apache Rd X Kroeger Mary 6751 Apache Rd X Kupec Jay 27761 Hopi Trail\ X Kupec Katy 27761 Hopi Trail\ X Lawrence Jeff 27570 Hopi Trail X Lawrence Karin 27570 Hopi Trail X Martinez Becky 27840 Hopi Trail X Martinez Rod 27840 Hopi Trail X Meusch Bob 27647 Hopi Trail X Oplinger Susan 27687 Hopi Trail X Piacentino, Frank Frank 6811 Apache Rd X Piraino Lisa 27660 Hopi Trail X Rochester Natalie 6768 Apache Rd X Schlotter Glenn 27700 Hopi Trail X Scott Karl 27640 Hopi Trail X Malchow Jean 27640 Hopi Trail X Straub Pete 27793 Hopi Trail X Straub Susie 27793 Hopi Trail X Wilson Vicki 27790 Hopi Trail X Wingerson Rene 27601 Hopi Trail X Coseo Tom 6785 Apache Rd X X Cole Sandy 2538 14th Ave, Greeley X Downey Nate 680 Saratoga Way, Win( Hello