The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20152498.tiff NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING Highway 34 Development As soon as Martin Marietta identified this site as a prime location for their facility, they also identified the fact that the site is located near residential uses. Therefore, as soon as Martin Marietta had a conceptual plan for the facility put together, they scheduled an open house style neighborhood meeting to hear from the neighbors about their concerns in order to find ways to address those concerns so that Martin Marietta would be operating on the site as a good neighbor. The neighborhood meeting was held on Tuesday, January 27th at the Best Western Plus at Highway 34 and 1-25. Martin Marietta mailed a notice of the meeting to all neighbors within 500' per Weld County's notification requirements and recognized that word would get out to people outside of that notification area. Over 100 people attended the meeting. Attendees lived within the immediate area as well as in Loveland, Johnstown, Fort Collins, Eaton, and Boulder. At the meeting, the project was explained to attendees, and representatives from Martin Marietta and Tetra Tech were available to answer questions, listen, and take note of the concerns. We also provided comment cards for attendees to fill out to provide their feedback. Martin Marietta kept records of all who attended the meeting and all of the comments received so that we would not overlook any significant concerns raised by neighbors. Attached is a copy of the documentation related to the neighborhood meeting and input received from the neighbors. Documentation attached includes: • Copy of the neighborhood meeting notice that was mailed out to neighbors within 500' of the site. • The list of neighbors notified of the meeting. • The neighborhood meeting sign-in sheet. • A spreadsheet that we used to track the comments received from neighbors. • A copy of the notes taken by Martin Marietta and Tetra Tech staff at the neighborhood meeting. • Copies of emails received from neighbors following an update email sent to neighborhood meeting attendees following the meeting. Highway 34 Development Weld County Use by Special Review Application Page 1 of1 aMartin Mcnetta Open House Notification You are invited to attend an Open House to get information about plans by Martin Marietta for the 131-acre property owned by Gerrard Investments and Weld LV II that is located approximately 1/4 miles south of Highway 34, east of Weld County Road 13/Larimer County Road 1, and north of Weld County Road 56. Martin Marietta is proposing to submit a Use by Special Review application to Weld County to permit the property to allow the land to be used as a plant site for Martin Marietta's operations. Specific uses at the site would include an aggregate processing facility, a recycled product processing facility, an asphalt plant, a ready mix concrete plant, asphalt cement storage and fuel storage. The site would be accessed by both trucks off of WCR 13 and by a rail spur loop planned on the property. Martin Marietta refers to this proposed project as the Highway 34 Development. This project will support the Colorado economy by providing building and construction materials to the northern Colorado construction and agricultural markets. The Open House is scheduled for: Date: Tuesday, January 27th Time: 4:00 p.m. -7:00 p.m. Place: BS Western Plus Crossroads Inn and Conference Center in the Vista Room 5542 E US Highway 34, Loveland, CO 80537 Attached you will find a vicinity map showing the location of the proposed project along with a preliminary concept plan for the project. There will be no formal presentation at the open house; therefore, you can attend at your convenience. Representatives from Martin Marietta and Tetra Tech, our consultants, will be available at the open house to discuss the proposed project with you one on one, answer your questions, and listen to your concerns. Martin Marietta's goal is to develop the project in a manner that is functional for us and respectful to the existing neighborhood. If you are unable to attend this open house and would like to discuss the project either over the phone or in person, please contact our planning consultant, Pam Hora with Tetra Tech at 720- 864-4507 or pam.hora(citetratcch.com or you can contact Julie Mikulas with Martin Marietta at 970-227-4041 orjulie.mikulas(o;martinmarietta.com. Thank you. aMartin Mai-ietta Vicinity Map of the Proposed Project Site f� HiGtiWlff, sa 11111W- ii Or Il `a" � ,gam '! Tg-"' 17 I IV *: - 1 ..roc ` „. hi BIG THOMPSON�tIV@R Al 4 rte- raj°/ 't' i L1 20 VICINITY MAPA NOT TO SCALE A P:,2b09P.13i-24097-I S00S.ProjMgnnAMmtings':Neighborhood meeting\Muting Noticedocx WELD COUNTY COLORADO LAND RECORDS AFFIDAVIT OF INTERESTED LAND OWNERS SURFACE ESTATE THE UNDERSIGNED, States that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names, addresses, and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners of the property (the surface estate)within 500 feet of the property being considered. This list was compiled utilizing the records of the Weld County Assessor available on the Weld County Internet Mapping site, http://www.co.weld.co.us, and has not been modified from the original. The list compiled for the records of the Weld County Assessor was assembled within thirty days of the applications submission date. Signature Date Property Owners Within 500 ft. of Parcel # 095718300044 Account Parcel Owner Mailing Address R6777070 095718200052 BRENCKLE PAMELA KAY R3549705 095718300044 GERRARD INVESTMENTS 1739 S COUNTY ROAD 13C LLC LOVELAND CO 805378869 R3853905 095718300048 HOWARD CHRISTOPHER C 27292 COUNTY ROAD 13 LOVELAND CO 805348214 R3853905 095718300048 HOWARD MARSANNE R6777069 095718200051 MORRIS CHARLES 205 KEN PRATT BLVD STE 120 PATRICK PMB 100 LONGMONT CO 805018998 R6777070 095718200052 SPADE MARY LOU R6777070 095718200052 SPADE ROGER HARVEY 6159 ROAD 64 TORRINGTON WY 822408326 R0515201 095718000009 WELD LV II LLC C/O JACK HOLLER 3821 DERBY TRL ROUND ROCK TX 786812322 R3853805 095718300047 WELD LV LLC C/O JACK HOLLER 3821 DERBY TRL ROUND ROCK TX 786812322 WELD COUNTY COLORADO LAND RECORDS AFFIDAVIT OF INTERESTED LAND OWNERS SURFACE ESTATE THE UNDERSIGNED, States that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names, addresses, and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners of the property (the surface estate)within 500 feet of the property being considered. This list was compiled utilizing the records of the Weld County Assessor available on the Weld County Internet Mapping site, http://www.co.weld.co.us, and has not been modified from the original. The list compiled for the records of the Weld County Assessor was assembled within thirty days of the applications submission date. Signature Date Property Owners Within 500 ft. of Parcel # 095718000009 Account Parcel Owner Mailing Address 095719100059 ACCOUNT NOT AVAILABLE R0515101 095718000008 BOEGLI WILBUR J 6577 COUNTY ROAD 56 LOVELAND CO 805348236 R6777070 095718200052 BRENCKLE PAMELA KAY R2139003 095718106034 DIRKS FAMILY TRUST 6825 APACHE RD LOVELAND CO 805348290 R6779805 095718400054 FRIEDE CHERYL 6943 COUNTY ROAD 56 JOHNSTOWN CO 805348237 R3549705 095718300044 GERRARD INVESTMENTS 1739 S COUNTY ROAD 13C LLC LOVELAND CO 805378869 R2136903 095718103019 GRAEBE ARTHUR L 27601 HOPI TRL LOVELAND CO 805348280 R2136903 095718103019 GRAEBE CAROLYN F R2137603 095718103020 HARTWELL MICHAEL R 445 N SUTTER ST PLANADA CA 953658059 R2137603 095718103020 HARTWELL NICOLASA R R2136502 095718103021 HECKEL LARRY 2046 PARK DR LOVELAND CO 805385019 R2137703 095718103022 HECKEL LARRY A 2046 PARK DR LOVELAND CO 805385019 R2139903 095718103034 INDIANHEAD WEST PO BOX 7011 HOMEOWNERS ASSN LOVEAND CO 805370011 R2137503 095718103018 INGLIS SHARON R6776739 095718000999 KOENIG RESERVOIR NON ASSESSABLE R2139503 095718107005 MALCHOW JEAN E R2137803 095718103023 OPLINGER GARY L TRUST 27687 HOPI TRL JOHNSTOWN CO 805378280 R2137803 095718103023 OPLINGER SUSAN L TRUST R2139403 095718107004 PIRAINO JAMES R 27660 HOPI TRL LOVELAND CO 805348277 R2139403 095718107004 PIRAINO MARY L Account Parcel Owner Mailing Address R6779804 095718400053 REID DIANE S 6 CRESTWAY CT NEW ALBANY IN 471409615 R0021092 095719000051 ROSS DAVID M 6248 COUNTY ROAD 56 LOVELAND CO 805348238 R0021092 095719000051 ROSS JANET K M0098602 095719000051 SAYRE ROSEMARY 6190 COUNTY ROAD 56 LOVELAND CO 805348208 R1519102 095719100059 SCHWALM KATHERINE 27071 COUNTY ROAD 15 NELL JOHNSTOWN CO 805348224 R2139503 095718107005 SCOTT KARL E 27640 HOPI TRAIL LOVELAND CO 805348277 R0184690 095719000049 SOPRIS LLC 4775 LARIMER PKWY STE 200 JOHNSTOWN CO 805349025 R6777070 095718200052 SPADE MARY LOU R6777070 095718200052 SPADE ROGER HARVEY 6159 ROAD 64 TORRINGTON WY 822408326 R2137503 095718103018 TARBELL SCOTT B 27575 HOPI TRL LOVELAND CO 805348279 R2137403 095718103017 VON LOH RHONDA R 27551 HOPI TRL LOVELAND CO 805348279 R0515201 095718000009 WELD LV II LLC C/O JACK HOLLER 3821 DERBY TRL ROUND ROCK TX 786812322 R0515301 095718000010 WELD LV II LLC CO JACK HOLLER 3821 DERBY TRL ROUND ROCK TX 786812322 R3853805 095718300047 WELD LV LLC C/O JACK HOLLER 3821 DERBY TRL ROUND ROCK TX 786812322 PROPOSED HIGHWAY 34 DEVELOPMENT NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING • Martin N't1 TETRA TECH Mar jet; r, Sign-in Sheet Would you like Name Address Email to be on the• ,n"'Finalist? NN • EMai I ( oveS Jett/ d G✓ 4 Ho �` V `rea a E JO(g. u°�rt, • PROPOSED HIGHWAY 34 DEVELOPMENT NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING ♦' Martin Sign-in Sheet `TETRA TECH Marlette • Would you like Name • Address • Email to be ow the.„ mailing listtY/N ." 171 • • _. _ - PROPOSED HIGHWAY 34 DEVELOPMENT NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING ft l , E.:fr( Sign-in Sheet Would you like Name Address Email to be on the .:ailing list? Y/N t i (. /(‘ _ C _ r /I'/, i tr 1`e c.A /-- _`\ -, I-1-z- '."t 27c/ n': El: 77 C ,< J. 1., y_ 347/11:(' E L-eAll,Ai 5l H LCfrit 12 L'i7 ii., k r ' � �V.v; t L ,°a C» 3y- j 2 „ ,!1.,2. 1/i ELGi. !��%po/!(-l� IV\I .4Lr �) ] is-� \ta:.('2 ct. j`-.--6l .�'`r��<< PROPOSED HIGHWAY 34 DEVELOPMENT NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING z : Sign-in Sheet Would you like Name Address Em? 1 to be on the i filing list?Y/N 7 'J i V. :) (.1 Flt '?N,G, ‘ P J s - /2 ( 1 ._ a) 1. t jig- CFL \ (t�1t- 7 C 0 NvC''c E. (CE S7 3 C G ' --Ii G-,ld) C ; ,0 5c, -c �.7 -263EL 6-- , 1 C��P`_.ter. i � ,,� L�.�� 6t:,�iU ;fit , �I/` � 1 >� '',I4I urn c)'% i re , ry 1_ 9 — 3f( : 1 tR ,u,,,_ , v 4 �- hiw;-.'t. � ijt� ��s?:„. �� _ f.:., y '"_�`�� :' 1. tt ( ... ... t f. r. ' PROPOSED HIGHWAY 34 DEVELOPMENT NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING li ^ mti��I fi o 1 TETRA,Il�ti TECH i lb Fr Name Address o would you like Email to be on the nailing list? YIN i ' r , l: b/I Pea JIB` 1,>)- C J.. l c ,,-, m Ji 1 `t 1 K. 6-_ c _ v C - \S '�. (- > \ ' `t:+,��C`-.\-t.k ;'tom , ` ^,<.,(—/--S'--- r /) l< F y ( (, F's; L . /f'1/L Zl ?F l`, %,1 c.L , `C.-� f / C-C -, y! j t ) ,1,). 1 )'l .//I °aN i� , F5� (: ( / (.�.i _ 1� r S� li �l/� r ! z-rJE��7�� i .� . r � GiCA"\r 1�e�r s� � , �f 1 PROPOSED HIGHWAY 34 DEVELOPMENT NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING r Sign-in Sheet Would you like Name Address Email to be on the mailing list?Y/N 1��;Qcu\ '\1\E ('\C=r L' � � �\� Lid `o4 y v J _ 1 i _ L rr ' 9 Y Y k� pC i 4 y M1 ( i r. t.� -� v F'� l t PROPOSED HIGHWAY 34 DEVELOPMENT NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING ., „a' �i ETRA TECH Sign-in Sheet I t Would you like Name Address Email to be on the ..,ailing lict9 V/N c 13k 1-ScNN— ;t'._\\\ +0J : t it L sj I :, c - J (Cu � (d`:. ( (1' rli;U/..J / 1. ) i /7_,;1_4::, i L ) - /r __,J \i I(Jr---„„VC. c L .� ( L.r 1 —1 —�;\r'�rr�a "f is�+`-'j( l ( e L , ` �� L:'L�� - PROPOSED HIGHWAY 34 DEVELOPMENT NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING t � Sign-in Sheet Would you like Name Address Email to be on the mailing list?Y/N „ { r 'ti °'Yi (c el lid p J _ is r;S G , ! L \4- - ≥`,i L rJr` (1/4- t ni.✓) fre; -T t 1/4gu'`� \ � v \ itil � ( i \ k k, I. lital(. j \\), L(_(, A r-' (2( 7 ,. hit 7 !: K-X =--cci PROPOSED HIGHWAY 34 DEVELOPMENT NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING Fits `pn_ y F �:; li..d€ Orb �: L 'Sa ��:: TECH k / Sign-in Sheet �� Name Address Would oyn the like Email to be on the mailing list?Y/N I i,' i „�..L 1 1 i` 417L. ( 7 '?.7 C vAilZ.) ul KIT:, 7C5.i 1 Lt ttl)11 1" Cpl / � �ti _ � -1 �� j� ��1 0 (� ; d)i-/ f c' 4 f,{J-t l<_.4 / 7`,� '-t ! G, , S!(� 1 , 1 1 `` t�G ..^'� �_.t� �.l✓b� 'T7' HI AJ) (1 (L- 1/ci7").;.Y iii ;A PROPOSED HIGHWAY 34 DEVELOPMENT NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING t ° � ""`c t� , * TETRA TECH Sign-in Sheet Would you like Name Address Email to be on the list? V/N 1 w l/ / 1 � r 1A,I V,_ ' :��iii 6�{ �� L�L� l �e� !}. 1 l, wi{ �� f �U\rtel L- 3 '��L1Lb( [ (A(Ili ��'\ L:., �)11t t i x, 11 rzcf< iv ) , J(' ) /� it4 '( i / [t i o V /) l (t¢C' y{v �i �Jl�� C1.S �i.�Gf..�� '� l �I Ef I ' � G • 'ft it c.v'-} I / (—�C (2(C 3V PROPOSED HIGHWAY 34 DEVELOPMENT NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING •" Martin TETRA TECH N41crietttaa Sign-in Sheet Would you like Name• Address I Bmafi to be on the U KT• / I /8 t �._.L1 J __ ',! ,.// P OSED 1 IG AY 34 EVEL ENT NEIL BO1' MEETING k Martin TETRA Marietta Sign-in Sheet tale XT , Att eX< s X �, go O>i�'..yy a t t 'rYy x≥" �A � OT .s ,7C`d11114g 1.� �t �: rtii //z-fri-t..5eAefi7 C J Highway 34 Development Public Comments from Neighborhood Meeting January 27, 2015 Date Name Address Comment Rec'd Source In looking over the plans, this proposed plant will be in my back yard. My wife and I build our custom home 10 years ago, planning for retirement. I retired last year and was looking forward to enjoying my retirement, enjoying the orchard I have been grooming, working in our large vegetable garden, and just enjoying our "Million Dollar View" of the mountains. I am very concerned that this asphalt/ concrete plant with rail road is not going to be anything I or anyone would want for a neighbor. Would you want to have this working plant in your back yard? I can only imagine the noise, the dust, and the pollutants that will be in the air. Not to mention the unsightly view I will have out my back door. I am also concerned that someday as we age and need to down size I will find that my 27601 Hopi Trail property values have gone down,there goes my equity that I am counting on in 1 Art Graebe Loveland, CO 1/18/2015 email 80534 my senior years. Julie, this is not fair. It's not fair that you move this unsightly working industrial site next to my back yard and peaceful neighborhood. I can't believe in all of Weld county you can't find a location that will not impact a residential area. If you must build this plant as proposed, please come buy me out of my house, I know you won't, because I can't imagine anyone who will be working there wanting to live in my home and put up with the noise, pollution, and view. Thank you for taking the time to read my concerns, please consider us and the other neighbors before moving forward. Indianhead Estates; 27848 Arikaree Rd., Loveland, CO 2 Ron Pernicke 80534 Pick a more suitable location, not near residential housing. 1/27/2015 meeting Highway 34 Development Public Comments from Neighborhood Meeting January 27, 2015 Date Name Address Comment Rec'd Source I am a strong supporter of this project. By us as citizens helping the largest road and highway contractor, we help ourselves by keeping these costs as low as we can. I am a commercial real estate broker and I know how important this can be Travis 772 Whalers Wy., to not only citizens living here now, but also to businesses looking to move to this 3 Ackerman Fort Collins, CO area. 1/27/2015 meeting 6943 CR 56, This is not a good use of this land. I live to the East and have been developing my 4 Johnstown, CO business as an Event/Wedding venue.This will completely destroy my business. I Chris Friede 80534 also want to understand your plans for traffic management, environmental 1/27/2015 meeting 6895 Commanche Ct.,Johnstown, CO Not a good neighbor when you only notified a few homeowners and the rest of 5 Alice Anderson 80534 us found out by word of mouth. Not much of a start for a trusting relationship. 1/27/2015 meeting You state that asphalt and cement are safe on your easel pads- but yet OSHA- 27761 Hopi Tr., Requires an SDS-Safety Data Sheet and specific personal protective equipment Jay and Katy Johnstown, CO to work with the products. Not safe. Added traffic is also more of a safety issue. I 6 Kupec 80534 oppose this site. 1/27/2015 meeting 27700 Hopi Tr., 7 Melanie Loveland, CO No -to extra traffic. No -to dust and pollution. No -to 24/7 plant noise. No -to Schlotter 80534 industrial zoning change. No-to odor. 1/27/2015 meeting 4708 Tarragon Dr., Johnstown, CO 1.Truck traffic- high concern RE Hwy 34. 2.Air emissions. 3. Precedent for heavy 8 Bob Cushman 80534 industry. 4. Night noise/light pollution. 5. Dust issues? 6. Train traffic. 1/27/2015 meeting Would you want this development next to your$800,000 home?We worry about our property value, dust, pollution, odor, health risk, noise, traffic. Why would 6645 Apache Rd., you even consider putting this right next to a housing development. We have the Loveland, CO most amazing,tight knit neighborhood I have ever been a part of. It is a beautiful 9 Dr.Trina Bogart 80534 place. Please don't jeopardize this! 1/27/2015 meeting Highway 34 Development Public Comments from Neighborhood Meeting January 27, 2015 Date Name Address Comment Rec'd Source From a business perspective (mine), there will be no benefit to our neighborhood, none! Addiotionally, the likelihood of detrimental impact is too 10 6865 Algonquin high. (Water, air,traffic, noise, land values.) Please find a location suitable for Dr.,Johnstown, CO your type of business elsewhere! Weld County is very large (sq mi) and there area John Liken 80534 countless other areas that would welcome you $9/hr jobs! 1/27/2015 meeting 27795 Blackfoot Rd.,Johnstown, Many concerns- Noise, Pollution, Odors,Traffic Congestion -already bad, Lower 11 Linda Glover CO 80534 Property Values.This only benefits Martin Marietta! 1/27/2015 meeting I have lived in this neighborhood for 25 years. I only see this endeavor as ruining my"little piece of paradise." How? 1. Air pollution 2. Noise pollution - NOISE NOISE NOISE 3. Traffic,traffic,traffic congestion 4. Lower property assessments 5. Loss of wildlife and impact on wildlife 6. Your computer models don't live in this type of environment. Live people and animals will.This is a no win situation for us. It is only a WIN WIN for Martin Marietta and your computer environments. PLEASE DON'T DO THIS TO OUR NEIGHBORHOOD! Build it next to your "home" instead and then not only will you enjoy the money but al the 27823 Blackfoot pollution and decrease in quality of life you want to impose on us. And, you on't Rd.,Johnstown, have to travel so far to work. I'll sell you my home at top dollar, which I know if 12 Judy Leinweber CO 80534 what you would want to give me. 1/27/2015 meeting 1209 N. County We do not want increased traffic. We do not want rail road traffic. We do not 13 Line Rd., Loveland, want fumes. We do not want farm land turned to manufacturing plant that will Barb Moe CO 80534 run 24/7. STAY OUT! 1/27/2015 meeting Highway 34 Development Public Comments from Neighborhood Meeting January 27, 2015 Date Name Address Comment Rec'd Source We're a small local salsa and sauce business that started organic gardening and gifting salsa 30 years ago. We still have an organic garden that is sold seasonally throughout CO to promote our 5 year old business. The bee population is great Jeff and Karin 27570 Hopi Tr., now but the noise, dust, toxins that would be devestating to our community Lawrence, Loveland, CO home and business. A cement plant exists at CR13 and 402. Why would you have 14 Gumbies' LLC 80534 2 in close proximity? 1/27/2015 meeting We on Hopi Trail -are not against development. We are against THIS industrial use of this land -which is incompatible with this area for so many reasons,traffic, road wear, noise, air quality, dust, hazardous particulates, loss of viewshed and 27793 Hopi Tr., many, many other reasons. We will organize against this, make our case to the Loveland, CO planning staff, meet and oppose at Planning Commission Meetings, and wth Weld 15 Pete Straub 80534 Co. Commissioners. 1/27/2015 meeting 27695 Blackfoot 16 Conrad Meith Rd., CO 80534 Very opposed!!! Will fight as hard as possible!!! 1/27/2015 meeting 1209 N. County Dennis and Line Rd., Loveland, Please STAY OUT of this farm community with your toxic CRAP. Please notify us 17 Barb Moe CO 80534 when your hearing @ Weld Co is going to take place 970-663-0411. 1/27/2015 meeting My main concern is that the planned location is fairly close to the river. Other 503 N CR 3, than that I am inherently opposed to any further development of the front range- Johnstown, CO especially those which may bring potential environmental hazards. I hope 18 Colton Comer 80534 another location can be found to suit your company and nearby neighbors. 1/27/2015 meeting Location too close to railroad,too close to river too close to homes, our health is 503 N CR 3, at risk as well as our land prices making it impossible to move away from hazards 19 Johnstown, CO from plant. Ruining precious Front Range for the sake of useless development! It Jennifer Hipp 80534 stinks! 1/27/2015 meeting Highway 34 Development Public Comments from Neighborhood Meeting January 27, 2015 Date Name Address Comment Rec'd Source The proposed site is currently productive farmland and per Weld County's comprehensive plan should be preserved for that purpose. Most adjoining property is Ag, residential or "low-impact" industrial.The proposed use will be 503 N CR 3, unsightly, noxious spewing poisonous and harmful fumes and dust in any Johnstown, CO direction the wind blows. Please look n the mirror and ask yourself if you would 20 Gary Gettman 80534 like to raise your children next to an asphalt plant? 1/27/2015 meeting This does not fit in with the current residential/agricultural setting that has been 27793 Hopi Tr., enjoyed for years. The idea that MM thinks they can operate such a facility Loveland, CO without impacting our health and quality of life is evidence that they do not care 21 Susan Straub 80534 or think we are ignorant! We will do everything in our power to stop this kind of 1/27/2015 meeting Having an Industrial Plant such as this one is unacceptable near the Indian Head Subdivision. Too much traffic already exists on Hwy 34.The health issues area 22 6801 Commanche concern also.This operation 24 hrs a day is not good.Too much noise and value Ct.,Johnstown, CO at homes will be in jeopardy.Just a bad idea!! Can't they find property less Ed Suppes 80534 valued?Taking away the agriculture land that feeds us!! 1/27/2015 meeting 1) Major concerns are decreasing property values for Indianhead Estates Homeowners; wil be severly impacted. 2) Noise; pollution; toxicity issues; odors. 3) Major traffic issues on Hwy 34 and Cty Rd 13 and 15. 4) Views of mountains 6801 Commanche destroyed. 5)Train traffic on Hwy 34 already an issue w/traffic stopped for Ct.,Johnstown, CO several minutes each time. 6) Martin Marietta not concerned with this 23 Nancy Suppes 80534 detrimental impact 1/27/2015 meeting 6811 Apache Rd., Frank Johnstown, CO This use should be in an Industrial Park. It is not compatible with this area 24 Piacentino 80534 Ag/Residential mix use. Hoping the County Commissioner will see it this way. 1/27/2015 meeting Concerns impact on the environment, water runoff, noise, odor, and toxins. 25 Ubaldo Walt 4527 Tarragon Dr., Impact on home value. Lack of noise abatement to West and South. Increase of Sanchez CO 80534 trucks on 34. 1/27/2015 meeting Highway 34 Development Public Comments from Neighborhood Meeting January 27, 2015 Date Name Address Comment Rec'd Source 26 ? NO 1/27/2015 meeting 27601 Hopi Tr., Loveland, CO 27 Carolyn Graebe 80534 This does not bring peace of mind or quality of life. 1/27/2015 meeting 27601 Hopi Tr., 28 Loveland, CO Art Graebe 80534 Please do not build this in my backyard! 1/27/2015 meeting 27687 Hopi Tr., This project is absolutely incompatible with the surrounding area. It will cause Johnstown, CO massive traffic congestion in the area. Many residents of local HOAs, etc. will feel 29 Gary Oplinger 80534 health effects, experience noise, and suffer loss of property value. 1/27/2015 meeting This development does not fit in the area. It is industrial in a home neighborhood 30 Gary Mattson 27381 Hopi Trail and warehouse area. Not appropriate. 1/27/2015 meeting The truck traffic will increase horrendously and it's already bad.Traffice 1239 Poplar St., sometimes is backed up from Centerra to east of the railway crossing. The fumes 31 Johnstown, CO from your proposed plant will contaminate the air on the very route I use for Barbara Engle 80534 running. 1/27/2015 meeting Indianhead Estates; 27848 Arikaree Rd., Why would anyone think such a large manufacturing industrial complex belongs Loveland, CO so close to houses etc instead of an industrial area? Concerns- noise, pollution, 32 Carol Pernicke 80534 smells, traffic, dust, RR's blocking roads. 1/27/2015 meeting 27823 Blackfoot Leonard Rd.,Johnstown, Cons: Air Quality, Noise,Traffic Congestion, Lower Property Values, Odor. Pros: 33 Leinweber CO 80534 Marting Marietta profit at our expense. 1/27/2015 meeting Highway 34 Development Public Comments from Neighborhood Meeting January 27, 2015 Date Name Address Comment Rec'd Source 1)Toxic emissions (whuich won't be prevented by a tarp over trucks) which can cause and/or aggravate a variety of medical conditions (pulmonary, liver, sinus, headaches and eventually concers) - impact of the plant operations can be inferred from pre-existing or new homeowner medical records and could be actionable- or even class-action. Negative impact on animals in nearby feed lots and horse farms, dogs walking and with outside pens. 2)Traffic interruption 34 impeding access to emergency vehicles (ambulances, fire trucks)which could negatively impact survivability- definitely actionable. 3) Impact on horticulture, gardens (vegetable and flower), neighborhood orchards. 4) Compromised quality Indianhead of life for homeowners- dust which gets into everything (my lawyer lives across Estates, 27811 from the Denver plant) -aggravated by the high winds- in all directions -on the Hopi Tr., plains-air quality, odors,visibility. 5) Lower property values- quotes in 1 Sharon Collins, Johnstown, CO reputable article as lower by 50%-due to environmental and quality and average MD 80534 20% increase in illnesses -see#1 above. 1/27/2015 meeting We don't want. It will decrease the property value. How unfair is this! Traffic, 35 Pam Sullivan 27397 Hopi Tr. environment, issues are bad now, It will only increase it. 1/27/2015 meeting 4512 SCR 17, Loveland, CO 36 Mary Wheeler 80537 I'm not in favor of this. Not our town. I will do all I can to get this to go away. 1/27/2015 meeting 4630 Tarragon Dr., 37 Johnstown, CO How much water will be required?Where will you get it? How will it impact Bob Nicholls 80534 water requirements in the area? 1/27/2015 meeting 38 ? NO 1/27/2015 meeting Highway 34 Development Public Comments from Neighborhood Meeting January 27, 2015 Date Name Address Comment Rec'd Source Phone call received. Closing on a lot in Indianhead Subdivision on 1/29/15 and was just told last night about the project and wants to understand it. Pam explained the project and MM's desire to work with the neighbors to address their comments and concerns prior to putting together the application. He was told this is going to bring down his property values so that is his concern. Pam explained that MM has done studies related to property values and that there 39 Chris Riley Indianhead Estates isn't any evidence to support that the use will impact adjacent property values. 1/29/2015 phone call Left a message saying he wanted to get information. Call returned, left a 40 Randy Jackson message. 1/27/2015 phone call 6895 Commanche Ct.,Johnstown, CO Left a message requesting a copy of the application. Call returned, left a 41 Alice Anderson 80534 message. 1/27/2015 phone call Highway 34 Development Public Comments from Neighborhood Meeting January 27, 2015 Date Name Address Comment Rec'd Source Call#1: Patrick Morris, the neighbor who owns the house and shop immediately to the north of the Gerrard driveway called Pam. He asked who all had been notified of the meeting and I let him know everyone within 500' of the property. He is very concerned about the impact of the proposed development on his property due to all of the added traffic. He said he owns 2 acres and was aware that development would be happening around him, he just wasn't aware that it would happen so soon. He was encouraged to attend the open house meeting next week. He said he would definitely be in attendance. Call #2: Mr. Morris was wondering when the traffic study my be completed. He's very concerned with traffic impacts on his property- both along his driveway that will parallel Martin Marietta's driveway and along CR13 (if turnlanes are required the road might come even closer to his house). Pam confirmed that we have the correct email address for him and she let him know that when the application was submitted and was available for the public to view that we'd notify him and all the neighbors that provided an email address and asked for notifications. Charles Patrick 1/21/2015 42 Morris 27520 CR 13 2/3/15 phone calls Highway 34 Development Public Comments from Neighborhood Meeting January 27, 2015 Date Name Address Comment Rec'd Source Ms. Siskowski called to find out when we'd submit (planning for end of February), she wanted to know the location of Martin Marietta's other asphalt plants in northern Colorado (told her I'd get the information and send it to her), she asked about the 24/7 hours of operation (explained to her teh daylight hours only plan with night hours being only for special projects), she wanted to understand the reason the train tracks are needed (explained they will be used to bring rock from Wyoming to the Colorado market), she wanted to know if a traffic signal was 43 planned (told her CDOT had plans for a signal at WCR 13 and Hwy 34), and she asked to be provided with a list of all of the other sites that Martin Marietta had looked at before deciding on this site (told her that information would be included in the USR application package and that neighbors who asked to be notified would be emailed when the application had been submitted and told how they could get access to a copy). NOTE: Pam emailed a response on 2/5/15 about the asphalt plant locations. Becky Siskowski Johnstown 2/4/2015 phone call We have a few question about the proposed highway 34 development. 1) The finical impact to our homes and property?We would like in writing from a 3rd party appraisal company what the impact would be. 2) Our Resident is in Indianhead Estates most all residents resided in this area for safety concerns we 27775 Blackfoot (myself and Ron) believe there should be a stop light if this project proceeds. Intersection of county rd 15 and hwy 34. 3) Impact study on wildlife, including Rd.,Johnstown, water foul. 4) What is the time line for this project to start? 5)Air quality impact? CO 80534 (Section (fine particles and so on). 6) Will there be any kind of security fence around the Linda Groff& 18, Indianhead property? 44 Ron Svoboda Estates) 2/1/2015 email Highway 34 Development Public Comments from Neighborhood Meeting January 27, 2015 Date Name Address Comment Rec'd Source COMMENT:Dear Pam,The meeting at the Best Western was very informative and extremely horrifying. Knowing what your plan is has caused me a few nights of sleeplessness as I wonder what I can do to stop the worst idea that has ever threatened to change my life in such a negative way. We bought our property in 1986 to raise our family in a beautiful country setting. We have been blessed to have this refuge as we faced some hard things in our life. We have watched the growth of the whole area and enjoy Centerra and the surrounding area.This is such a beautiful place full of bikers,joggers,and children playing. Little did we know that when Gerrard came to our neighborhood and offered to pave the road,that it would come to this.We have endured trash being thrown all over our property,the death of the dearest puppy of my life that I raised from birth to 11 months when,early one morning,someone went off the road and killed Riley,my retirement baby.I will always be suspicious of who I think did it because I hear them all racing to work.My two sons couldn't stand the three months of crying over Riley being killed,so they bought me the most beautiful shepherd from Germany that has brought the joy back to me,but with all the traffic you are proposing,my life will be a nightmare and my three beautiful shepherds and beloved cat are all in danger.This is an area that has children playing and people jogging and riding bikes all the time. Why would you ever want to place your industrial site right here?I cannot believe Martin Marietta has to make their money on the plummeting property values of all their neighbors.Can't you be a company that cares about American people. My family has lived here for so long and worked so hard to improve our property,and you would absolutely flush our property value down the toilet. It boggles my mind that this site would be one you consider acceptable for such an industrial site. Please reconsider this bad idea.The people are so against this and it is so unfair that you would do so much damage to our way of life. Barbara Moe,1209 North County Line Road,this is also WCR 13. PH RESPONSE:Dear Ms.Moe,Thank you for taking the time to email me your comments. I remember talking to you at the meeting and I'm sorry about what happened to your dog Riley.Your comments will be logged in our comment tracking system.Sincerely, Pam Hora.COMMENTER'S RESPONSE:Thank you so much,Pam. I appreciate your caring nature and I pray this all goes away. Barb Moe. 1209 N. County Line Rd., Loveland, 45 Barb Moe CO 80534 2/6/2015 email Highway 34 Development Public Comments from Neighborhood Meeting January 27, 2015 Date Name Address Comment Rec'd Source Tamara called Pam Hora. She is a realtor from Fort Collins who represents some owners of lots for sale in Indianhead Subdivision. Tamara wanted to understand the approval process for the USR, where other sites with asphalt plants might be located, and to confirm that Martin Marietta was in fact working to permit another site for their facility. In addition to talking through these items with 46 Tamara, Pam explained to Tamara that we are working on addressing all of the concerns addressed by the neighbors and that information will be incorporated into the USR application. Pam offered to include Tamara on our email list so that she could receive updates and she indicated she'd email Pam with her contact information. Tamara Suppes 2/12/2015 59 yrs. old, lived here since 1987. Remembers Julie Mikulas from DeWalt project. Concerned with rail and traffic. Explained rail coming from the south.Told her we don't have control over UP route. Wants something in writing from UP to confirm route. Hwy 34 improvements when COOT determines it is warranted. Indianhead Wants to know date we first discussed with planning. Will email her date of first Estates, 27261 pre-app meeting. Commissioner in neighborhood put his house for sale in Hopi Tr., Loveland, December. 47 Diana Beccue CO 80534 2/4/2015 phone call Highway 34 Development Public Comments from Neighborhood Meeting January 27, 2015 Date Name Address Comment Rec'd Source Concerns with Martin Marietta contemplating building an asphalt plant about a half mile or less from an organic certified farm she owns. Says she has connections with the Colorado School of Mines and many people in environmental engineering. She is extremely against it and wonders why it is even being contemplated to build in a farming community like her own. She is concerned about pollution from the asphalt plant, especially since she runs an organic farm. 48 Barbara Calkins 2/24/2015 phone call MARTIN MARIETTA'S PROPOSED HIGHWAY 34 SITE NEIGHBORHOOD OPEN HOUSE JANUARY 27, 2015 SUMMARY OF COMMENTS AT THE MEETING, BY TOPIC Site Plan (Julie Mikulas, Pam Hora,Fernando del Monte} 1) Residence-South end of subdivision • Concerned with dust coming across into neighbors yards • Taft Hill operation is disgusting 2) Residence-West of site • Wanted to know route for train if not crossing Hwy 34. Is that permanent or will that change later to blocking traffic on Hwy 34? 3)Johnstown Councilman James • Annoyed with Weld County that they did not give Johnstown a heads up about it. Explained that we had the pre-app meeting and Weld asked us to do the neighborhood meeting before we got too far into the design. We had not notified Weld County when we were having the neighborhood meeting. Wants to know which county roads in Johnstown area the train will be crossing. 4) Residence—Southwest side of site • How long will each train be blocking CR15? Can UP change the route? 5) Residence—unknown • Asthmatic and will have health issues 6) Residence—Morris directly north of entrance • Concerned with traffic and access noise since he is so close 7) Residence-unknown • Why did we have to pick this site, move it 10 miles to the west. 8) Residence—off of CR 56 on south side of site • Doesn't want trucks going south • Wants to know hours for rail deliveries,GW frac sand runs all hours of the night and they have to honk their horns at every intersection. 9) Residence—west end of CR56 • UP needs to repair the tracks on CR15,they are in bad shape for vehicles to cross. 10) Residence—subdivision • It is difficult to get onto Hwy 34 from CR15. He sometimes heads south on CR15,west on CR56 and back north on CR13. He is concerned with us blocking CR15. When the stoplight goes in, he would like us to build an access road from the subdivision west along the north side of our property to CR13 so they can benefit from the light also and avoid the mess our train will make. 11) Residence—SE corner of site • Noise, property values, and dust 12) Residence—Dennis Moe 970-663-0411 (NE corner in Larimer County) • Will he get noticed of hearing dates since in Larimer County and not Weld 13) Residence—South MARTIN MARIETTA'S PROPOSED HIGHWAY 34 SITE NEIGHBORHOOD OPEN HOUSE JANUARY 27, 2015 SUMMARY OF COMMENTS AT THE MEETING, BY TOPIC • Need rail barriers on county roads when trains are coming through 14) Residence-unknown • Questioned 24/7 and daylight hours. Thinks we will be running every night. Doesn't believe we will try and stick to daylight hours. 15) Residence—farmer to the south • There are deeded water rights on the clay tile drainage to the reservoir. Koenig Reservoir owns those rights. Used to farm this property for his aunt and uncle as a kid. Collector for clay tile on east edge above reservoir. Watch out for the sink holes almost lost his tractor several times after storms. 16) Residence—east of plant • Permitting her property for wedding planning and reception area. Already has her architectural plans ready to go and has been working with the Weld County small business development group to get her business started. Our project will ruin that. 17) Residence-neighborhood • Concern of wind direction in terms of smell • Obstruction of mountain views • Decrease in property value 18) Residence—neighborhood • Neighborhood is unique semi-rural environment that will be destroyed by the project 19) Residence—WCR 13 • Concerned about odor,contamination, noise,and decrease in property value 20) Residence • Public safety concern of train blocking WCR 13 or WCR 15. • Concerned about overloading Hwy 34. 21) Resident/Lobbyist • Site layout does not meet Union Pacific setback requirements for"hazardous" materials • Group is conducting background baseline studies of soil and water near site. 22) Resident • Why can't MMM build this facility in Windsor? • Where will cement be imported from? 23) Resident • How long will it take the train to go around the track? 24) Resident • Concerned about the height of the concrete and asphalt batch plant 25) Resident • We are against the project and are pro-farming. "People need to eat." 26) Resident • The project is too close to too many people. MARTIN MARIETTA'S PROPOSED HIGHWAY 34 SITE NEIGHBORHOOD OPEN HOUSE JANUARY 27, 2015 SUMMARY OF COMMENTS AT THE MEETING, BY TOPIC 27) Indianhead Estates Resident • There is already a batch plant just 3 miles away,why is another one needed?(2 people asked) 28) Residence- Unknown • If you put this application through we'll take this to the State legislature to fight this and get setbacks. 29) Residence- Unknown • How will traffic along Highway 34 be handled at the RR crossing—there is already a lot of traffic and this will only make it worse. 30) Residence—Indianhead Estates • We aren't opposed to Martin Marietta as a business,they are a good company. But this is not an appropriate use next to a residential neighborhood. It is the wrong land use for this site. 31) Residence- Indianhead Estates • Concerned about the noise—rocks hitting metal. What is the noise abatement plan? What is the safety plan? There are a lot of retired people who live in Indianhead Estates. They don't want to hear the noise from this facility all day long. 33) Residence- Indianhead Estates • Lafarge tried to do this to us before and it didn't work and we are going to fight it again. 34) Residence—Jim Croissant,South on CR15 along rail • On the Farmers Ditch Board,the Farmers Ditch was not notified of the meeting. • How far off the ditch is this project? 35) Residence- Indianhead vacant lots within 500': • They purchased the lot for the views and are concerned about the height of the berm blocking their views. Environmental(Walt Wright, Erin Kunkel) • Air effect : sediment issues,dirty, air pollution, lead and mercury depositing on surrounding land by asphalt plant • Concrete dust is toxic • Can we still grow our vegetable garden,asphalt toxin effects on plants • Baghouse concerns—how effective • Asphalt Issues= hexane formaldehyde, looked up the MSDS.This causes sinus problems,cancer,and other issues. • Noise :Train horns, hours of operations,trucks, plants, working • House Value • Time Table • Safety of community and wildlife • Diversion area explanation,water rights issues • Hazardous chemical and product storage MARTIN MARIETTA'S PROPOSED HIGHWAY 34 SITE NEIGHBORHOOD OPEN HOUSE JANUARY 27, 2015 SUMMARY OF COMMENTS AT THE MEETING, BY TOPIC • One lady had friend who owned an asphalt plant, it was later purchased by Asphalt Specialties, but he told her to never deal with an asphalt plant, never ever live near one, he has constant migraines and other issues now • Smell issues, deodorizers, masking the scent • People expressed they did not agree with the layout of the meeting, it was hectic and no one was receiving answers • Did not understand why so few invitations were sent out • Possible traffic light to ensure a safe drive out of the neighborhood with added truck traffic • Reported traffic study was conducted by CDOT that mentioned intersection of I-25 and HWY 32 was unfit for current traffic flow in 2012 • Organic Garden and bee population effects, http://gumbiesgoodies.com/about-us/ • Train traffic=hours of operation, horns • Types of Environmental studies • One person worked for oil and gas and mentioned the biggest difference was that oil and gas moves around while we are permanent • Thinks we need a third party to access what are we doing,and to do an Environmental ESA Questions 1. Do you have recycle water? 2. Discharge issues?Cannot dump into ditch so where would it go? 3. Where will the natural gas be coming from?What if you can't have it? 4. What are the independent studies for asphalt plants? 5. What about the gravel pit on 1-25 and big Thompson?Are you trying to run them out of business? 6. How do you monitor the emissions? Is there any way to see live data on emissions? Have a source that can say when it is bad and good?Not just an average 7. What about the piles of loose material?Concrete, rap,dirt?Will they be allowed to just release whatever they want into the air 8. What about emergency response when a train comes through? It already takes 5 to 10 minutes to wait for one 9. What will we be drinking once you contaminate the water?Are you providing drinking water? 10. Did we have a backhoe on site already digging test pits? 11. What about the bears?There are three families of bears that live along that area that fish and game is aware of.What will you do to their home? 12. Told deodorizers don't work.Are you trying to use these? 13. How are you controlling the hazardous substance 14. Who will be in charge of all the permitting 15. If you have a diversion area, is it lined?If not is the contaminated water going into the ground? 16. What types of materials will you be storing?Are any hazardous and do you have to tell the state? Aggregates(David Jordan,Britney Guggisberg 1) Art/Wife Grandby—NE Subdivision • Very upset • Back of our yard • Asthma Issues • Dirty Industry • What happens to the wildlife MARTIN MARIETTA'S PROPOSED HIGHWAY 34 SITE NEIGHBORHOOD OPEN HOUSE JANUARY 27, 2015 SUMMARY OF COMMENTS AT THE MEETING, BY TOPIC • Rail Vibration—How do you reduce the vibration of the rail? • They have an organic garden 2) Pat Morris—Lives on the 2.2 Acres due north to the proposed property • Nice/Understands • Talked to D. Hagerman about potentially buying his property as he will be in between MM and EnviroTech Services • He is aware of EnviroTech Services • Property Value will be reduced • He is a real estate appraiser • Traffic volume impact • His house distance is 120'foot from WCR 13 • Increased noise due to the extra truck traffic 3) Eric and Jenni—BROE • Asked how long we have been working on this project? Stated we are in the preliminary phases. No application submitted at this time. • Asked how UP Rail is to work with? Directed Eric to ask David Hagerman as he negotiates with the Rail. 4) Don—NE Subdivision • How many rail cars? • Lived there 11 years • Wife has CLOPD(lung issues) • He worked in the concrete business installing foundations for 40 year • Concerned about the Highway 34 delays due to the rail crossings 5) Lynn—Farm to the southwest • Farms hay and corn • Increase in noise due to the rail cars? • Will the rail cars come at night or day? • How may rail cars? • Unload during the day or night? • Great Western moves frac sand cars at night—they were told this was going to be minimal • Increased Traffic on WCR 13/HWY 34 6) Linda Broth—NE Subdivision on Blackfoot • How often will the trains come? • Will they be night or day? • Will they unload night or day? • Rail is associated to increased noise • Reduce our property value 7) John Rogers • What time of the day will we unload the rail cars? • Biggest concern was the railroad/cars? • How many? • How long to unload? • Unload day or night? • What is the truck count? MARTIN MARIETTA'S PROPOSED HIGHWAY 34 SITE NEIGHBORHOOD OPEN HOUSE JANUARY 27, 2015 SUMMARY OF COMMENTS AT THE MEETING, BY TOPIC 8) Helen Kistner—NE Subdivision • Increased traffic on Highway 34 • Highway 34 is congested and this will increase congestion • Increased Noise due to extra truck traffic and rail operations 9) Lester Eastman—NE Subdivision • Irritated by the cattle section along Highway 34 • Asphalt Odor • Noise Increase • Increase Traffic Issues—Hard to take a left off of CR 15 due to Highway 34 traffic 10) Karl Scott • Noise • Dust • Odor • Ruin their view • Reduced Property Value • Railroad tracks in yard 11) Bob and Carolyn Cushman—Thompson Crossing • Why can't we mine east of I-25(east of Coulson) • Can't we find a better place to operate? 12) Judy Linewebber—NE Subdivision for 25 years • Very upset • Husband worked for the rail industry and she says it's a dirty industry • How are we going to environmentally control the diesel emissions from the rail engines to keep her healthy • She don't want to have black on her due to the rail engines • Noise pollution—Rail is loud and she does not want to hear trains • Switching of trains • Air pollution (diesel/dust) • What happens to the wildlife in our neighborhood • We are destroying their neighborhood • She has not mortgage—This will reduce her property value 13) Carla Jacobson—NE Subdivision • Upset • Health Impacts • Increased Traffic • Increase Noise • How many rail cars? When will we unload (day or night)? • They hear Vestas blades being railed at night 14) Loren and Kelly Hiatt—Rainbow Bridge Pet Crematorium (Under Contract)(SW of our entrance of WCR 13 • Under contract with Christopher Howard • Info: Kelly Hiatt(Owner),2105 E. 11th Street,Suite 180, Loveland, CO 80537 • High end RV Storage along the railroad tracks • Asked MM to discuss a potential noise barrier MARTIN MARIETTA'S PROPOSED HIGHWAY 34 SITE NEIGHBORHOOD OPEN HOUSE JANUARY 27, 2015 SUMMARY OF COMMENTS AT THE MEETING, BY TOPIC 15) Janet and Dave Ross—40 farm acres south side of 56 • Will fight the crematorium business • Dust pollution • Increased Noise • Irrigation water to the ditches and how do we impact their irrigation water • Increased railroad traffic • Increased truck traffic • Why do we need another ready mix plant when Johnstown Ready Mix is a couple miles away? • Aren't there other areas more conducive? Summary: 1) How will you manage the noise? 2) How will the odor be managed? 3) How many rail cars? 4) How long to unload? 5) Will the rail cars be day or night? 6) How do you deal with the vibration of the rail train? 7) What about the emissions from the diesel engines from the rail engines? 8) How do you minimize the dust? 9) Property value reduction? 10) Impact our view of Long's Peak? 11) How big is the berm? 12) What is the traffic volume increase? 13) Will it impact our irrigation water? 14) Johnstown Ready Mix plant is a couple of miles away,do we need another one? 15) Why this site and not Great Western? 16) What is your timeline? 17) Will it impact our wildlife? 18) Hours of operation? Asphalt(Ken Ball,Jerimy Runner) Questions 1. What kind of dust/emission collection measures will you take? 2. What kind of lighting will be there? 3. What do you think will happen to property values? 4. How much noise does your operation make? 5. What will your hours of operation be? 6. How do you make asphalt? 7. What causes asphalt to smell so bad? 8. Are we trying to move here because of what is going on with the Taft Hill plant? 9. Why aren't we using the Great Western site? 10. What sort of emissions will you have? Light/Sound/Site/Taste—Robin Acromite(owns 25 acres near site)? 11. Why did you pick our site to build on? 12. Would you want this in your back yard? Concerns 1. Heights of silos 2. Hours of service 3. Noise, dust,toxins, MARTIN MARIETTA'S PROPOSED HIGHWAY 34 SITE NEIGHBORHOOD OPEN HOUSE JANUARY 27, 2015 SUMMARY OF COMMENTS AT THE MEETING, BY TOPIC 4. Destroying their quality of life 5. Damage to the roads from our truck traffic 6. Loss of agricultural land—Chris Freide(Owns 35 adjacent acres) building a wedding facility Concrete(Marvin Meyer, Dan Stringer) Questions 1. What are our recycled materials used for 2. What kind of dust collection measures will you take 3. What kind of lighting will be there 4. What type of power will run your plants 5. How much noise does your operation make 6. What will your hours of service be 7. Will county road 13 turn into a 4 lane road 8. How do you make concrete 9. Why aren't we using our Loveland site(St Louis pit) 10. Will recycled material be brought onto site 11. Why are we putting a plant so close to Johnstown ready mix 12. Why aren't we moving closer to Eastman Kodak 13. How come I didn't get a letter to this meeting. I live 500' beyond the neighborhood 14. How do you control the mercury in the cement 15. What sort of emissions will you have 16. You have so many plants why do you want more 17. Why did you pick our site to build on 18. What is louder asphalt or concrete plant 19. Have you had any supporters Concerns 1. Rail noise 2. Air particulates hurting their vegetation and gardens 3. Heights of silos 4. Soot or dust from railroad 5. Spread the 3 operations out across the county 6. Hours of service 7. Noise,dust,toxins, 8. Destroying their quality of life 9. Damage to the roads from our truck traffic 10. Organic damage from our materials 11. Neighborhood being vested now will decline 12. Please reconsider building here, people are retired and will lose their life savings 13. Rail yards are horrible with diesel odor, loud noises,and make poor neighbors 14. We are losing our agricultural land 15. House will devalue by$50K the day we move in 16. You are going to affect my irrigation and my quality of life 17. We will not roll over and let this happen. Transportation(James Sham,Gene Coppola) 1)Art Graebe • Concerns with Noise MARTIN MARIETTA'S PROPOSED HIGHWAY 34 SITE NEIGHBORHOOD OPEN HOUSE JANUARY 27, 2015 SUMMARY OF COMMENTS AT THE MEETING, BY TOPIC • Odor concerns • Block views 2) Robin Acromite • Zoning and planned uses in the surrounding area?? 3)Charles Morris • Lives directly north of the entrance • Concerns with increase in traffic 4)Carl Scott • Lived near train before and had train de-rail. Concern with train derailment • Dust • Increase Traffic • Views 5)Scott James • Polite • Councilman from Johnstown • Concerned with Truck trips • Concerned with where traffic goes and comes • Invited MM to talk to planner at Johnstown—John Franklin (970)-587-4664 • Talked about development on Northeast side of Route 34. Commercial to be built west to east. 6) Dave Warrender • Transportation 7) Lynn McDonough • Traffic 8) Paul Markus • Odors • Noise • Dust 9)Greg Hewitz • Frequency of train • Traffic routing • Amount of tonnage out the gate 10)Walt Sanchez • Number of trains • Traffic impact on Route 34 • Noise 11) Linda Graff • Number of trains • If 34 to be upgraded with signal? MARTIN MARIETTA'S PROPOSED HIGHWAY 34 SITE NEIGHBORHOOD OPEN HOUSE JANUARY 27, 2015 SUMMARY OF COMMENTS AT THE MEETING, BY TOPIC 12)Cheryl Freide • Lives just east of Koenig Reservoir • Planning an event center 13) Diana • Traffic 14) Bob& Renata Meusch • Visibility • Just bought empty lot NE corner of property. • Polite 15) Lynn • Resident along CR 13 • Do not mind if Train comes during day • Great Western Train blares horn at 2 am • Traffic • Noise • Odor 16) Barbara Engel • Will put more trucks on road • Runs 4 mile loop that includes CR 13 17) Pat Boegli • CDOT will not improve intersection of CR 13 and Hwy 34 • Traffic already backs up on Hwy 34 18) Dave Ross • Farmer to south • Agitated but calmed down • How affect water rights, ditch runs from proposed property to his. • Irrigates 40 acres, ditch irrigates another 120 acres to south • Devalue property 20% 19) Rob • How many train trips 20)William • Traffic concerns • Lives near I-25 near Big Thompson 21)Other • Berm no effect on visual—live 150' above berm in subdivision Julie Mikulas From: Art Graebe <paratex17@aol.com> Sent Thursday, March 12, 2015 3:43 PM To: MMHighway34 Info Subject Re: Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Development update Hi Julie, Thanks for the email, can you tell me are you going to for sure put this plant behind my house? We are trying to sell our house due to being recently retired. We have lost two prospects that we know of because they found out an asphalt plant was going to be built behind our home. Just the rumors of you building has hurt us, and most likely is going to cost is money that we were counting on for our retirement. It would be nice to at least give prospective buyers an answer. Thank you again for the email. Best Wishes, Art Sent from my iPad On Mar 12,2015,at 3:34 PM, MMHighway34 Info< . , >wrote: Dear neighbor, Thank you for taking the time to attend our neighborhood meeting or taking the time to contact us about your concerns regarding our proposed Highway 34 Development project. As we explained,we wanted to meet with the neighbors early on in our planning process so that we could make sure we were knowledgeable about your concerns. Since that time, we have been diligently working on our application and working to find ways to address your concerns because it is important to us that we be a good neighbor. The date that we will submit to Weld County is not yet known as we are waiting on some additional information to complete our application. However,once the application is submitted to Weld County and deemed complete,we will send you another email to let you know how you can obtain a copy to review. Julie Mikulas Land Manager I Rocky Mountain Division Martin Marietta 10170 Church Ranch Way,Suite 201,Westminster.CO 80021 1800 N Taft Hill Road, Fort Collins,CO 80821 720.245.6418 1 Julie Mikulas From: Wolfgang Dirks <wolfdirks@earthlink.net> Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 4:20 PM To: MMHighway34 H ig hway34 Info Subject: Re: Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Development update The ONLY way you are going to eliminate our extensive concerns and objections is by moving your proposed environmental eyesore to another location like the Kodak site in Windsor, which is much more appropriate and compatible to your type of operation. On Mar 12, 2015, at 3:34 PM, MMHighway34 Info wrote: Dear neighbor, Thank you for taking the time to attend our neighborhood meeting or taking the time to contact us about your concerns regarding our proposed Highway 34 Development project. As we explained, we wanted to meet with the neighbors early on in our planning process so that we could make sure we were knowledgeable about your concerns. Since that time,we have been diligently working on our application and working to find ways to address your concerns because it is important to us that we be a good neighbor. The date that we will submit to Weld County is not yet known as we are waiting on some additional information to complete our application. However, once the application is submitted to Weld County and deemed complete,we will send you another email to let you know how you can obtain a copy to review. Julie Mikulas Land Manager j Rocky Mountain Division Martin Marietta 10 hu h Ra trite 2 t 5 2 80 N aft H I Road, Fort Collin CO 8052 720.245.6418 1 Julie Mikulas From: Jim Piraino <jimp@Ipbroadband.net> Sent Friday, March 13, 2015 8:42 AM To: MMHighway34 Info Subject: Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Development update Dear Ms. Mikulas, I submit to you that the only way to mitigate our concerns is to find a location that does not result In the destruction of our lifestyle. With the vastness of open space that Weld County has available,there is little logical reason for you development at this location given the hundreds of lives you will encroach on upon. Make no mistake,this project is not welcome. Jim Piraino 27660 Hopi Trail Indianhead Estates. From: MMHighway34 Info< y > Date: March 12,2015 at 3:34:03 PM MDT To: MMHighway34 Info< Subject: Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Development update Dear neighbor, Thank you for taking the time to attend our neighborhood meeting or taking the time to contact us about your concerns regarding our proposed Highway 34 Development project. As we explained, we wanted to meet with the neighbors early on in our planning process so that we could make sure we were knowledgeable about your concerns. Since that time, we have been diligently working on our application and working to find ways to address your concerns because it is important to us that we be a good neighbor. The date that we will submit to Weld County is not yet known as we are waiting on some additional information to complete our application. However, once the application is submitted to Weld County and deemed complete,we will send you another email to let you know how you can obtain a copy to review. Julie Mikulas Land Manager I Rocky Mountain Division Martin Marietta 170 R n i et to , 800 iNT ftH Ro Fo olhn O80 2 720.245.6418 1 Julie Mikulas From: bill boegli <bkboegli@lpbroadband.net> Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 11:07 AM To: MMHighway34 Hig hway34 Info Subject: Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Development update I appreciate your desire to be a good neighbor; however, considering the close proximity of your planned berm, rail line and gravel offloading operation to our property(next to the lake), we're not encouraged! Our main concerns are the high noise levels, odor, light pollution and the sight of rail cars passing on the backside of the berm. The only resolution as we see it is that the plant be built in an alternation location (somewhere more appropriate away from a housing development) or that Martin Marietta buys us out at market value! 1 Julie Mikulas From: Scott Fenton <fentonscott508@gmail.com> Sent Friday, March 13, 2015 2:41 PM To: MMHighway34 Info Subject: Asphalt plant I have been a home owner in Indian Head Estates 6720 Apache rd.for eleven years,and frankly I can not believe you people have the nerve to surround our beautiful neighborhood with your Industrial pollution and destruction of our life style! Given that Weld county is so large, and there are hundreds of acres to Industrialize that done create an assault on a neighborhood that has been her since 1978!! Sent from my iPhone 1 Julie Mikulas From: Walter Fenton <scott_fenton55@msn.com> Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 3:09 PM To: MMHighway34 Info Subject: Asphalt plant My name Scott Fenton I am a home owner 6720 Apache Rd. I have lived in the beautiful location for eleven years! Frankly I can not believe that your company has the Gaul to suggest let alone build an industrial plant that is practically on top of this neighborhood ! With literally hundreds or thousands of acres in Weld County,why do you need to build this plant on top of a neighborhood that has been here since 1978!Your present proposal is an Assult on our home values and lives! How would you feel if some Company built this plant in your back yard!!!' Sent from my iPhone Julie Mikulas From: Alice Anderson <ander6@skybeam.com> Sent Friday, March 13, 2015 4:29 PM To: MMHighway34 H ighway34 Info Subject: RE: Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Development update Thank you Julie for the update and the offer to review the proposal. I would like to encourage Martin Marietta to not build at this site. I know it seems a great fit with the railroads and Hwy 34 so close and the available ground. It is an EASY fit, not the most wise fit. In reality it will be a nightmare for everyone in this area. There really isn't enough room for the setbacks needed, the amount of traffic on Hwy 34 is huge already and there was a horrific accident on it yesterday. It is not compatible with the existing subdivision, which was here first. We want quiet, no odor, less intrusive industry, period. We know you have tons of money and will make a nice profit while our property values will go down and we will stand the loss not Martin Marietta. This is always unfair and totally unethical on Martin Marietta's part, since the loss in value is not the result of Colorado economics. I would encourage you to look at Milken, CO and talk to their community leaders. They have already set aside an 12 zone for such a company as yours, and a railroad is nearby. Please pass this on the decision makers at Martin Marietta. It would be very surprising to me if one of them cares enough to contact us. I hope that you have contacted every homeowner in my neighborhood as we all feel the same way. Sincerely, Alice Anderson Julie Mikulas Land Manager I Rocky Mountain Division Martin Marietta 10170 Chun -h Ranch Way,Suite 201,Westminster, CO 80021 1800 N Taft Hill Road, Fort Collins, CO 80521 720.245.6418 1 Julie Mikulas From: Leonard Leinweber <leinsweb@Ipbroadband.net> Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 6:56 PM To: MMHighway34 Info Subject Re: Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Development update If you really wanted to address my concerns, you would not build your plant at the proposed site. I feel certain that you would not want it near your bedroom window. Please do not do this to us. Thank You! Len and Judy Leinweber -- MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com wrote: From: MMHighway34 Info <MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com> To: MMHighway34 Info <MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com> Subject: Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Development update Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 21:34:03 +0000 Dear neighbor, Thank you for taking the time to attend our neighborhood meeting or taking the time to contact us about your concerns regarding our proposed Highway 34 Development project. As we explained, we wanted to meet with the neighbors early on in our planning process so that we could make sure we were knowledgeable about your concerns. Since that time, we have been diligently working on our application and working to find ways to address your concerns because it is important to us that we be a good neighbor. The date that we will submit to Weld County is not yet known as we are waiting on some additional information to complete our application. However, once the application is submitted to Weld County and deemed complete, we will send you another email to let you know how you can obtain a copy to review. Julie Mikulas Land Manager Rocky Mountain Division Martin Marietta 10170 Church Ranch Way Su 'e 201, Westminster, CO 80021 1800 N Taft Hill Road, Fort Cor..ns, CO 80521 720.245.6418 MMHighway34.lnfo@martinmarietta com 1 Julie Mikulas From: Leonard Leinweber <leinsweb@Ipbroadband.net> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 2:48 PM To: MMHighway34 Info Subject: Neighbor Concerns Dear Ms Mikulas, I am writing in response to your e-mail dated March 12, 2015 ("As we explained, we wanted to meet with the neighbors early on in our planning process so that we could make sure we were knowledgeable about your concerns. Since that time, we have been diligently working on our application and working to find ways to address your concerns because it is important to us that we be a good neighbor.") It is obvious from this statement in your e-mail that Martin Marietta DID NOT HEAR CLEARLY the concerns expressed by myself and neighbors. We have stated at the meetings that WE DON'T WANT YOU HERE and WE DON'T WANT YOU AS OUR "NEIGHBOR". That is the UTMOST CONCERN that we have. You can give and send all the rhetoric in the world on how you are going to meet all the regulations and standards, but that doesn't change the fact that Martin Marietta IS NOT WELCOME in our backyard. There are NO regulations or standards Martin Marietta can meet that will not impact us execrably! And that is the bottom line. Please tell Martin Marietta that it is not necessary for them to go forward with this plan, but that it is essential for them to LOCATE A DIFFERENT SITE to build this unsightly, polluting, monstrosity on. Unpretentiously, Judy Leinweber i Neighborhood Meeting, June 9 , 2015 This supplemental document includes • Neighborhood meeting notice letter mailed to neighbors • Neighborhood Meeting sign-in sheets • Public comment notes from two individuals Martin vcriettc Neighborhood Meeting Notification You are invited to attend a Neighborhood Meeting on June 9, 2015 regarding our proposed Highway 34 Development. This meeting is open to the public. The purpose of this meeting is to review the content of our Use by Special Review (USR) application that we submitted to Weld County (USR15-0027) in April 2015, give attendees an opportunity to ask questions about the proposal, and hear any additional ideas that our neighbors have about ways that we can address concerns. The Neighborhood Meeting is scheduled for: Date: Thursday Tuesday, June 9th Time: 6:30 p.m. — 9:00 p.m. Place: University Schools Auditorium (651918" Street, Greeley) A formal presentation and facilitated discussion will begin promptly at 6:30 and we will promptly end the meeting at 9:00. We have developed a website about our project: http://www.mmhighway34.com/. The website includes a link to a complete copy of our application. We encourage you to take a look at the application materials prior to the meeting. The website also offers you a way to contact us with comments or questions. Background information The Highway 34 Development project is located on 131 -acres of land owned by Gerrard Investments and Weld LV II that is located approximately 1/2 miles south of Highway 34, east of Weld County Road 13/Larimer County Road 1, and north of Weld County Road 56. Specific uses proposed on the site include a rail loop with unloading capabilities for aggregate, an aggregate processing facility, a recycled product processing facility, an asphalt plant, a ready mix concrete plant, asphalt cement storage and fuel storage. HIGHWAY 24 r tH irk.-- 17 I • E CO RD 20C SIZE ---- '• u r' BIG THOMPSON RIVER - - -_ 24 19 " 20 VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE A MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS. INC In January 2015, Martin Marietta held an open house neighborhood meeting to let the neighbors and other interested parties know about our plans for the proposed project and to find out the concerns of our neighbors. The purpose of the meeting was to gather information to assist us in developing our Use by Special Review (USR) application to Weld County. Our intention was to submit an application that would address the issues of concern and integrate mitigation strategies into the site plan to address those concerns. Included in the USR application package that we submitted are a multitude of studies that we had specialists prepare to help us understand potential impacts and then propose effective mitigation techniques. Pd24097\133-24097-150021ProjMgmt\Meetings\Neighborhood meeting\Meeting Notice.docx I U W i Q I- .Ct W C) G A E as picil W , [ 5) 45 W Am Oc *4 Z W Dm* Hrni W4 D .4 M ,`n 0tto A c ,� 5- �-+ ONc4 a c; • = E � HIt L � : g 0vii ti ; • - cO r At � so rz 45 Z z W ct W O z am 0.• .4. \c, i f‹s I . i'l\ �., L f 6 , <,4 __„ 1 \ , 'c,_.; j ' '1-)kii C O C ci __; ),, c,31 4 ) \ ci k , , 4 b b ct v _) I il U 1H a I : �, \, cc z � - . W � Cv � ti � v v 1 74- NI -- \tal- i �, p t E;i • \ I - q-) CL 45) CI) " " (r-\ N q, 4 4 Ai 11 6 , W Ni ' cv en k ( ,) 0 c. A *4 4 % A : ,f -\t, L ) 44 -0 1 WA N --). $ 4 7r ri =iv) 1,,,, i, -ii -3 = \ c -i .* ) 3 a ;---)-- = 8 1- I al 1 4' ) \\ O cl c.) , - �' o cA , �, \,_ • f..\ i --.--: \ z c? 2 ` -,' O f % II gg4 \ (r • i\< \ . ' ‘ i 73N ,) 4c +4 \'' 't t-A cc - D—I ea. 'E' . t \ 2 . ci -c- k.) z Pa, ii , k k A c .- z \ , ) \ N. - Ts Ai 7) 44 4: c\ \\,j g) s N. _\ O z cc; i _ at 4 , . • O 0.0 kc) 3 \, a O �►` �, .c a) 4 J 0 I r U W C _ w o Ce ( .~ W o _. . a E- . o c, >, c4 El) SS A. 2 ) �` V Li) 9 <aw .; '/) S i Q �rz O z u kii W -� , t /if.? ICI v Emm Z _, , (-7‘) , e , , , W W �A L•T4 ,c t., �� w it efl) II) rl 4P2-1(I) ..•-: t.,-- f O cc �EN, tA Cin z ca • !--i ,,, 5, '' ' t.----) --ss- .Z g g ii 2 N rTh'‘-C.. < i Z :I:: -N -Li,,, k, V\-- C W W hPi 0c) (N, -ct A ® `g (-6 r in, -3V: N* l I U W I— Qs cc — W C) I E Li ( W ) ct ,,, _ 0 0 4 W >1 Ji 0 AO t 4 W *..a w4 rzi A ® i- Z ct ® � E � c H ' � o H g M . ,__, ',--F, 1< --, Hfl 0 = C W CA W Er 4.1 g a C lz t - 2 *d.)g‘ --c \o --b- o �� c; v ‘ .473 .(1) 5 , , . c-c)r c \ 4 t...._,/. _., Lin C� VJ 1^ v c) I U W l- < c'. ' z 0 IW ) . c71 o 4 4- 44 t o Am C c 4 ll w W A TA tn r. 4� f A p = t P = g b 4 • _, 'U 8 \', .1 C: p � Q' ii *mil ;4= = 0 A cf) W4 p A.ii , c O c --it \ ti 1/4.A. %) Yr . ti ci ct {-- !----- \ ' The; ..„/ c.i. ( 7! \ 4 2 __, , ,, , , ,0 ,, _ r , J ,, ,,: c c$ _, _, .O_ , i, r____ I :s V W I a .1c ) I— -c,, tx A W imi o ,..� /, Fri cilti> Eml 46 U :a\ Z ./2 Ni Ji S ° - , Pk O c ,/ a , W W W A W4 gicJ $ . --- . ti 1)) - -i- t en ^ ,...i I) tto ---' () 0 6 cn c ` c--- ? C el C4 1 ) r‘ licy-- cj csc° _g _ivc-1 -4: jj `2 : �- ° � ) tLS. da—H -1 : _ c7) < +1 v d c C g , .\.r k A ‘ , .� s .5 j .,j ) t 4 4. , c-°- - z Fa, ,.. ..p .--i- in F- . F icko .,. ) . ,,. (s_ni = c. _ i _ l_idiedrn .__,_ rc ca • ..,_ , ,,_i w -iO .f , mkt, Q .a. C3 . i CA W4 Or • Nr-C N9 cO ca (-) 1,-4, -.Z 1-S. 4- O 4 r i % - .—z) bf) 0 Nir c) 17 • K (b :3 r. --Th --) C( v • 12 . 73 As r) ,- 0 AS > 7 ; , d 4 O I) f cz:;) c4-4f) a) ‘ , -;91- -� 9r ZCVO- ct d e 4 , ✓ ~ V t3 V ' I (Er U to W N Q _I- ,\ H = � E 9.) --, W I - 1 ! I OO I s[ # ) C E c ' o EMI 8 c Q 4 4.74 (a ce -Q4) 0 a 00 a c wii P4 [T4 A W c j -,c._ c- - ) t -7_ 1 J --1-- lo N 2,\A ), 4 A In r3 :-:.„) --, ,-, , a v; . ,- z u9N -'fir -�7; [ � :4: i i-E39 i \R ' . ' s .4- D-D . ari . 4 z‘Vk if i , . , 48 ,), _:__ pH— .- r , �c. a crA < -74( 2 1, � ,, _A c. --L (y) in ck QC) e '; /) 1 W so 0 * rte ' N - C - -- `� Z'--CA W y.. \ — r , h, iiq n O 4 cv) r N9 t,S\ c-os 60 rl \%. cp n 4 11\ g _,. _t 1 1/44 am Cek t_) _ii:_ k 1 \ ,) _ t5 b 2 C _ vt 1 -4{,Ty. 24 U\ --i;:z 4 %g )._;-R 4 )„„. Ct .-.) N , ;-_) I ,t 'i? 1 c e Ci I U W Is Q CC 4 W 0 H O 0 • (r#1 E to w il E-0 ta w4 o 40 W 4 W arel WW : W M 21 _ (iAt' 4A ci ® r4 ' r1' o = E ,-4 2 'zi= g 4ti il go C < ~ II an, r2 = ' -' 4: f can ›, p Cr P•T4 Pn O .C - a) .P Q) P :I Do 2 I2 42 4 se _. a ) c ) t I V W Q H re W C) 0 ct C) Pom 0 I w !Lin bn ® O N ® 0 _ o I W cop W ® Z v C c C ._ a� E CI Q 2 N3- I U 'a Cf < "I cc •'- IM. r4 G ..� 13 . ._ ct _zf E V w ct c5 H o w G I. V+, `J l ® _ v W W W A W IC gst• tin 8 , M �..� by ® i � rr ) •Z4? G dk) fr, • r-o 0 '1: = g t re lc . Z)-4 z = -, , I , fl,, ,_:- \-1\ %P. cn w4 c‘r‘ 4 ' -. , ® _ aii 4 �f � v I U W I- 4 s W i—. c." W P I'm o ,.4 0 8 W Ct H 4 r. o A ® , O A W _ n'm • s -' tn t) .. .-it'D -i __ .I ® � � Z) C l©C • tE cii E 4- = '' i'",) °„ , ._, ICI p�/ j t M�+�4 Mil I • . ,� -t� 8 W p ® � ; =)-1 (2: z A W ° C g 3 I 4a C I) e J b b cl 12 Z 4 © -5 Question/Statements MM Public Meeting 6/9/15 1. What other locations have you looked at? 2. Low levels of concrete dust cause pulmonary problems, are you willing to be responsible for regular health examinations of all residents within a two mile similar to the monitoring that you do for your own employees? 3. Would you build a house in the buffer zone? 4. If this site is rejected, where will you build it? 5. Why can't you expand existing facilities? 6. Site has high water table. Are you willing to provide ongoing ground water monitoring and post a bond or set up a trust that would compensate all parties for any contamination? 7. Will the site have a clay liner to protect it? 8. What happens if a system fails, alarms, toxin escape - how long before the entire system is shut down? 9. What happens if a fire starts? 10. Wouldn't it better than hiring your own doctor to have an independent review of health, etc. 11. What are the prevailing winds in the air? What wind data did you include in Airscreen model? Why not local data? 12. What will be the capacity of asphalt plant and concrete plant? 13. What kinds of smoke and opacity does it the plant create? 14. There are 2-3 major ditches that intercept at that site, did you take those into consideration for drainage planning? 15. Have you done bonds to protect neighborhoods at other sites? 16. Can you access the bonds without legal issues? 17. Will the street sweepers blow the dust throughout the neighborhood? 18. Community work group - how/when will it happen? 19. How much oil and diesel is stored onsite? 20. Is the dumping of aggregate going to create noise? 21. Will you buy my house? 22. Traffic will be more backed up? 23. What is your market area? 24. Is this size of this facility way over scale for the area? 25. How long does it take to unload a train? 26. Your site are ugly, not pretty like the video. 27. How high is the berm? 28. How to you manage rocks and gravel coming out of trucks and wet concrete coming from trucks? 29. How do you abate the dust from lawn chairs, yards, gardens, etc. 30. You are not meeting residential standards at the property line. 31. What vegetation will you put on the berms? 32. How are you not crossing 34 if materials are coming from Wyoming? 33. How will you control low frequency noise? 34. How many trucks at night? Operations at night? 35. County Road 15 is hard to turn out on; a light will not help. 36. If this proceeds, what can we anticipate in 2016/2017? 37. Concerns about noise generated by trains, wheels, turning, high frequency noise. 38. With the elevation in the neighborhood, noise abatement won't work. 39. How many truck trips in peak hours? 40. What about silica dust? American Lung society information. Incurable disease. Encourage those to look at that. Comments: Live on County Rd. 56 and nothing to prevent you from looking at the plant. Studies can be manipulated to show whatever you want them to. Concerns about noise in the night. Concerns about vibration. Worried about respiratory problems from more dust. Concerns about traffic on County Road 54. Concerns about Kelium frontage road. Jeopardizing long-term business. Ruining quality of life. You don't care. Only noise we want are birds. We would be willing to accept residential, light commercial. Daughter negatively impacted by train sound/vibrations. Concerns about people working at home during the day. Martin Marietta s Proposed Highway 34 Site Neighborhood Meeting Questions and Comments June 9th, 2015 6: 30-9: 00pm General Presentation Questions and Comments 1 .) Compatibility next to last — not true 2 .) What other locations were looked at? - Along UP line from Loveland airport to Milliken - Issue: difficulty with fitting rail - Access to Interstate System difficult 3.) What will be in empty space inside the rail loop? - Space will be natural vegetation or agricultural 4.) What requirement is there to decrease chances of sparking from rail tracks? - 12 ' clearance buffer between vegetation and rail tracks on each side 5.) Concerning dust and pulmonary disease, will MM be willing to compensate regular health exams of all residents within 2 miles of plant? - MM understands concerns and has hired a medical doctor to look at data - Doctor hired by MM is available to talk to residents to address specific concerns 6.) If this site is rejected, does MM have a back-up plan? - At the moment, MM does not have a back-up site; finding a site with access to rail and highway is challenging 7.) Industrial parks in Weld County: Plant in Greeley/Fort Collins. MM is worth $9 billion and owned by Lockheed Martin . . .Why can t MM expand existing facilities or find a place not so close to other people? Toxic deposits have been shown to exist in a 2 mile radius of an asphalt plant. Shouldn t the company want to be community compatible rather than corporate compatible? - MM looked at expanding their Greeley facility to do rail, was not physically possible - MM would love to have a facility not close so neighbors, but railroad and highway dictate the location of possible sites 8.) The current proposed site has a high water table within 2 of the surface. Will MM conduct ongoing groundwater monitoring of any and all contamination? - MM considered the water table in its design - MM looks to protect groundwater and will look at groundwater monitoring 9.) Will clay liners be used to protect entire site? - No. There will be some areas that are paved. Air/Odor/Health & Safety Questions and Comments 1 .) What systems/plans/alarms are in place if something does go wrong and a system failure occurs? Want information on a hazard analysis to prevent and mitigate. - MM conducts a job safety analysis daily to idenitfy steps, what could go wrong, and what needs to be done if something does go wrong - If something were to fail/occur, employees would respond immediately and shut down the plant. - A root cause analysis would be done to identify the root cause and correct it 2.) How long would it actually take to shut down? What kind of failures could happen? - The plant would be shut down within 5 minutes — most of this time being for equipment to completely stop moving after power is cut - The most common events to occur would be a rip in a conveyor belt or a hole in a chute. - Uncommon events include fires or severe spills. - MM has never had a fire at an asphalt plant that MM operates. 3.) In regards to 2"d opinion studies, wouldn t it be more effective for parties involved to get independent party research done? - MM is willing to work with neighbors and the community on this., 4.) In regards to odor, would MM agree to loss of their USR if they don t comply with a 4x dilution standard? - MM conducted an Airscreen model - Odor isn 't harmful - Vertical tank design controls odor by limiting surface area - Are proposing carbon filters to address odors - filters take out organics and by doing so will remove even more odors - "Odor" is a very subjective parameter - Odors will be way below maximum limits at property line 5.) What was the Airscreen Model method? Location? Wind direction? - It was conducted using data from Fort Collins/Loveland Airport site (closest location) - Involved 10 years of data - Prevailing wind direction:N-S 75% of time; 10- 12% of winds from E; less from W 6.) The USR is so general from reviewing it. What are the concrete and asphalt capacities as well as the recycle process on facility? - Capacity is limited - Numbers for air screen model reflect max capacity of plants - Numbers presented in application will be limit in USR 7.) In regards to odor and no violations in the Fort Collins facility, would you be willing to accept a 4: 1 dilution ratio for violation standards? - The test is subjective so to give it a certain number is difficult to do - MM will consider it and provide a response 8.) Will MM include groundwater monitoring as part of their plan? - MM will look at this and will provide a response as to what they can or can 't do 9.) What kind of smoke will be emitted? - Very little smoke will be emitted due to filters - What you will see coming out is steam; the way you tell it is steam is by seeing that after the first 30-50 ' the steam evaporates and you don 't see it anymore - MM has to do stack testing - Smoke is not emitted since bag filters are used on the stacks 10.) I noted several errors in calculating storm water drainage and the use of ditches and piping to the river. - Drainage calculations per Weld County standards; we cannot mitigate with ditches 11 .) There are two ditches and current vegetation on site. Why not hold water in a retention pond and test to see if it is contaminated? - The storm water permit requires testing of all water leaving the site. - The flow going out will leave at historic levels - Calculations are per Weld County requirements 12.) Will bonds be put in place to protect neighborhood/are there bonds in place elsewhere? Can they be accessed without legal issues? - MM has bonds in place with locations in other states - Bond requirements are tied to permit and if they are not meeting requirements, they're in need of correction. If not corrected, bond becomes available. - This is something MM could consider for this site. 13.) A street sweeper, was mentioned. How much dust will there be if you need a street sweeper and won t the dust just blow all over? - The reason for the street sweeper is that aggregate trucks will be on non-paved surfaces. A street sweeper will help with tracked out material from non-paved to paved areas. Most operations do not have them, but MM is willing to do this. 14.) When will the Community Workgroup happen? - This is usually worked out as part of the USR. - The structure is developed over time and MM will work through this with the community. - Would suggest that the County be involved/have a member 15.) In regards to emissions, people are at great risk. Would MM be willing to install AQI monitoring to alert neighbors if an AQI above 75 was registered? Would MM agree to shut down until air quality improved? - AQI measures ozone, particulates, carbon monoxide, etc. Because of this, different triggers/factors can affect AQI. For example, farming can impact AQI during planting, as well as cars could add VOCs. Ozone alerts happening countywide can be due to oil and gas development. Therefore, it is extremely difficult to isolate the asphalt plant in regards to AQI measurement. 16.) What if the unthinkable happens? Say oil on site blows up. How much oil is on site? - 37, 000 gallons stored in multiple tanks - 24, 000 gallons of emulsified AC - MM is working with the fire district for controls - MM has never had an asphalt plant fire (Illinois asphalt fire found through a Google search was a contractor fire at an MM site) 17.) Do you think you will be compatible if you meet EPA standards? - Yes. 18.) Has MM ever measured the existing environment for sound, etc.? - No, MM has not done this. - MM is taking in additional measures to make sure to keep sounds levels will be lower than permitted levels. Traffic and Rail Questions and Comments , 1 .) I appreciate you moving the rail back 800 ; however, my house on the south side of the rail is still very close to the rail and you aren t moving this back. The dumping of aggregate will create a tremendous noise. - The location of the existing rail and the required rail radius drives what MM can do to locate the rail spur. 2.) Seeing that there will be 1 , 120 truck (round trips), that means there will be 16 miles of trucks (when you account for spacing between trucks) and traffic is already locked up on Hwy 34, how will this site affect traffic and road quality? - The county will require MM to upgrade roads/CR 13. - MM will work with CDOT on a plan for the signal light and intersection design. 3.) My wife has a respiratory problem — will emergency response be affected? - MM had a traffic study prepared to understand projected traffic issues and will be working with CDOT on road improvements. 4.) If the USR is approved, MM employees still get to go home at night. This site is taking away from our quality of life. Eight neighbors are out on extended holiday together, which shows how close this neighborhood is. You ruin our lives if this happens. 5.) Concerned about CR 54 being used by truck to avoid congestion on Highway 34. 6.) How much train traffic is projected? There are 20-25 trains a week; MM will add another 2-3 per week. 7.) This will degrade the neighborhood . Are you will to live there in the open space on the site? Don t do this. 8.) The Kelim Frontage road was said to be "irrelevant." My workers use this road all the time. 9.) What is the market? How far does MM want to reach to sell its product? The size of this facility seems way too big/oversized. - Facility will serve Greeley, Loveland, Ft. Collins and area North of Highway 66 - This is an average sized facility for a rail connected facility like this - The asphalt and ready-mix areas are not much larger than typical 10.) How long will it take to unload? What hours will trains be running? - Unloading will occur during daylight hours - Will not unload aggregates on Sunday - Usually takes 8 hours to unload - If not unloading, train will be parked - MM cannot promise when the train arrives and leaves as that is up to the UP Railroad. MM will work with UP to shorten the window. Visual/Noise/Real Estate Questions and Comments , 1 .) Neighbors didn t want to watch the visual model video so it was turned off before it got to the point that showed views of the facility from the west side of the Indianhead Subdivision looking toward the facility. 2.) Will MM compensate for loss of property values? - MM is still conducting a real estate value study and will look at the issue when the study is complete. 3.) MM is solely responsible of ruining the quality of life of everyone in the room. 4.) We live on CR 56 and look north . There is nothing to prevent us from looking into the plant and there is nothing to block the wind . - MM is looking to do additional screening and additional visual barriers. 5.) There are health issues related to breathing . The quality of life will be destroyed . 6.) Currently, there are no loud noises at night, so how can you prevent the sound level going from 0 decibels to 55 decibels? - MM will look at the area to the south for sound walls. - MM is working to minimize noise levels. 7.) How are studies going to be unbiased and truly reflect what is happening? - MM has to get their air permit from CDPHE and CDPHE will carefully review MM's studies before they will issue a permit. 8.) We live between both train tracks. This will increase train traffic in the area and the noise will affect us. Would you put your house in the middle of all of this? Child is upset every time a train passes their house on the tracks. 9.) How high are the berms? - Currently set at 20 '. 10 .) We live on a hill and will be able to look over the berms anyways. 10 .) I moved to the country to be in the county and don t want to see walls and berms. I don t want to see trucks crossing . There will be dust and aggregate on the roads will make it hard to stop due to rocks and gravel coming out. I see this as industrial area coming in . 11 .) How do you abate the dust? - In facility — water suppression/spray at transfer points - Street sweeper - Water trucks used to keep down trucks - MM can 't allow dust to cross their property lines 12.) MM is not meeting the residential standard at the property line for noise. Would MM be willing to do so? 13.) It will be a big ugly berm, what type of vegetation will be put on the berm? 14.) Sound can jump over walls and berms. 15.) Concerned about trucks during peak hours. Commuters don t have any idea what they are getting into. It will be horrible. 16.) People are taking a lot of time to express concerns, we plead with you to choose another location. 17.) This site will encourage other industrial areas- we are not NIMBY — we are ok with other development. Nothing but industrial will happen and that will drive down home values. Industrial use is incompatible. If this is approved it will begin a nightmare. 18.) Will there be a reclamation bond put in place to put site back to a green place to be sure there is an end to this nightmare? - MM will look at bond options. 19.) County Rd 15 is the only entrance to Indianhead Estates. At times it is hard to get out when trains are there or during rush hours. 20.) Concerned about impacts to emergency response times. 21 .) It s the County Commissioners we need to convince. This is just a job to MM. To us, this is our life. 22.) The worst case is in the summertime when people are outside in their yards. 23.) A slow train going around a curve will cause the wheels to squeal, possibly at 80 db. How can you remove this noise? - MM will look into this and the use of automatic lubricators. Also working with UP to prevent. - Squealing is not expected as part of the project. 24.) Our neighborhood is at less than 50 dB in the daytime and less than 40 dB 25.) Engineers have not studied USGS data 26.) Indianhead will look over any berms, don t use berms, they won t work. 27.) We want to see actual noise readings. 28.) Will the train start and stop during unloading? - The intent is to keep the train slowly moving around the loop 29.) If raw materials come from Wyoming, how does the train come from the south? - The UP line from Wyoming goes south along Hwy 85 and then turns back north toward our site. The line continues past the Hwy 34 site into Fort Collins where it ends. 30 .) The highest level of noise acceptable is listening to the birds on my property. 31 .) Did you extend the invitation to the Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners? - MM invited Weld County Planning Staff - BOCC won 't attend, they need to decide based on hearing 32.) Vibrations causes low frequency noise that goes over things (like berms). 33.) Property values will be very negatively impacted . This includes a radius of up to five miles or more. Houses will see a 30-50% drop in value. There should be a real estate compensation fund of at least $75 million. 34.) Where do I find the traffic analysis? - In USR application — link to application is on MM's website. 35.) Have you heard of silica dust and silicosis? Are you willing to do a study on the quality of life that this will impact on Indianhead? I encourage people to read about this on the American Lung Society s website. Hello