HomeMy WebLinkAbout20151215.tiff PUD FINAL PLAT
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
CASE
NUMBER: PUDF14-0009 PLANNER: Kim Ogle
APPLICANT: Marc Savela, Brookfield Residential Properties
6465 So. Greenwood Plaza Blvd., Suite 700, Colorado 80111
ADDRESS: c/o Fred Tofoya, Redland, 8000 South Lincoln Street, Suite 206, Littleton, CO 80122
REQUEST: Planned Unit Development Final Plat - Amendment to First Filing, PF-1078 - Replat of Lots 1-32,
Block 7; Lots 1-11, Block 8; Lots 1-14 Block 9; Lots 10-17, Block 10; Lots 1-7, Block 14 and Tract
H (243 Lots with R-1 (Low Density Residential); C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial); C-2 (General
Commercial) Zone Uses and the Vacation of Lake Catamount Parkway between County Road
9.5 and Eagle River Road; the Vacation of Platte River Drive between Elk River Road and Lake
Catamount Drive; Grand Lake Drive between Elk River Road and Lake Catamount Drive; Maggie
Court between Emerald Lake Drive and Emerald Lake Drive; Samantha Place between Willow
Creek Run and Willow Creek Run; Willow Creek Run between Emerald Lake Drive and Willow
Creek Run; Emerald Lake Drive between Yampa River Road and Willow Creek Run; Waneka
Lake Court between Piedra River Road and Piedra River Road; Clear Creek Drive between Lake
Catamount Parkway and Piedra River Road; Piedra River Road between Clear Creek Drive and
Eagle River Road; Escalante Creek Court between Meridian Lake Drive and Meridian Lake Drive;
Meridian Lake Drive between Escalante Creek Court and Yampa River Road; Squirrel Creek
Court between Yampa River Road and Yampa River Road; Yampa River Road between Eagle
River Road and Eagle River Road; Fish Creek Way between Canadian River Road and Yampa
River Road; Canadian River Road between Eagle River Road and Yampa River Road; Castle
Creek Way between Eagle River Road and Yampa River Road; Trinchera Creek Road between
Bayshore Drive and Bayshore Drive; Miramonte Lake Circle between Bayshore Drive and
Bayshore Dirve; Bayshore Drive between Eagle River Road and Yampa River Road; Bayshore
Drive between County Road 9.5 and Eagle River Road; Cimmaron River Road between Fountain
Creek Drive and Colorado River Road; Fountain Creek Drive between Colorado River Road and
Cimmaron River Road; Colorado River Road between Fountain Creek Drive and Cimmaron River
Road; Elk River Road between St. Vrain River Road and Cimmaron River Road; St Vrain River
Road between Elk River Road and Cimmaron River Road; and Lake Catamount Parkway
between Eagle River Road and Yampa River Road; and continuing Oil and Gas Production Uses
along with approximately 10 acres of open space consisting of a river corridor, private
recreational lakes and community parks in the I-25 Regional Urbanization Area Overlay District -
Barefoot Lakes PUD
LEGAL Part of Section 35 and Section 36, Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6`", P.M.,
DESCRIPTION: Weld County, Colorado
LOCATION: East of and adjacent to County Road 9.5 and South of and adjacent to County Road 28
ACRES: +/- 369.37 PARCEL#: Multiple
Narrative Summary:
Brookfield Residential Properties is submitting Barefoot Lakes Filing No. 1 for Final
Plat approval by the Weld County Board of County Commissioners. Barefoot Lakes Filing No.1 is a proposed
re-subdivision to a portion of the St. Vrain Lakes Filing No. 1 final plan. Barefoot Lakes Filing No.1 will include
seven (7) construction phases in total. The first construction phase will be based on the approved St Vrain
Lakes Subdivision plans providing sixty three (63) single family residential lots. Subsequent phases based on
the Barefoot Lakes re-plat will include two-hundred forty (240) single family residential lots with three lots that
will be reserved for future development in accordance with the PUD. The underlying area was previously
platted with a total of two-hundred fifty one (251) single family residential lots and 16.0 acre of townhome
density at 12 d.u. per acre for a total of 192 townhome units. This plan will result in a net increase in single
family units of 46 lots in exchange for a reduction of 192 townhome units.
This new Final Plan is consistent with the prior final plan in that the land uses are remaining the same. The
location of dedicated streets are generally being held with the main exception of Barefoot Lakes Parkway
replacing Bayshore Drive, the re-configuration of Lake Catamount Drive, and the dedication of streets in the
townhome parcel (Lot 48 Block 2). Portions of previously dedicated right-of-way will be vacated with
rededication of public right of way to accommodate the proposed residential product. These areas include
Lake Catamount Drive and areas north of that road. Cul-de-sac re-configurations will occur at Grand Lake
Drive, Platte River Road, Elk River Road, St Vrain River Road, and Colorado River Road. Bayshore Drive
will be vacated with an overlapping dedication of Barefoot Lakes Parkway. The width, type and location of
utility easements will be provided in a consistent manner to what was provided at the time of the St. Vrain
Lakes Filing No. 1 Final Plan. No other changes are proposed.
THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES'STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THIS REQUEST BE
APPROVED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
1. The submitted materials are in compliance with the application requirements of Section 27-7-30 of the
Weld County Code.
2. The request is in conformance with Section 27-7-40.C of the Weld County Code, as
follows:
A. Section 27-7-40.C.1--That the proposal is consistent with Chapters 19,22,23,24 and 26 of the
Weld County Code.
The proposed site is not influenced by any intergovernmental agreements however, the property
is within the 1-25 Regional Urbanization Area.
Section 22-2-140.B RUA.Goal.2 states "The County, property owners, municipalities and other
jurisdictions should coordinate urban land use planning within the Regional Urbanization Areas,
concerning but not limited to development policies and standards, zoning, street and highway
construction, open space and trails, public infrastructure and other matters associated with urban
development." The Barefoot Lakes Planned Unit Development includes common open space
designed and located to be easily accessible to all the residents of the project and usable for
open space and recreation. The site has private recreational lakes which are to be used as an
amenity and for sailing, and fishing; there are also areas planned for picnic areas and walking
trails. The applicant has submitted a Landscape Plan for the development; staff will require a
Detailed Landscape Plan be submitted and approved by the Department of Planning Services
prior to recording the Amendment to First Filing.
The PUD is located within the 1-25 Regional Urbanization Area, and within the three mile
Municipal referral area with the Towns of Mead, Firestone, Frederick and City of Longmont. The
Towns of Mead, Firestone, Frederick and City of Longmont did not return a referral response
indicating a conflict with their interests.
Section 22-2-120.A R.Goal.1 states "Ensure that adequate services and facilities are currently
available or reasonably obtainable to serve the residential development or district." The
proposed PUD will be serviced by Little Thompson Water District for potable water and fire
protection requirements and St. Vrain Sanitation District will handle the effluent flow. Little
Thompson Water District reviewed the request and finds that it does comply with their
comprehensive plans as stated in their referral dated September 29, 2006 under PF-1078, the
District returned a referral response dated January 19, 2015 indicating that the District is working
with the developer and there is no conflict with their interests. The St. Vrain Sanitation District
reviewed the request and finds no conflicts with their interests as stated in their referral dated
October 3, 2006 under PF-1078; the District returned a referral response dated January 20, 2015
indicating that the December 2013 Construction Plans for the subdivision required additional
information and an updated execution of a subdivision service agreement is required. Also
attached was a December 11, 2013 letter indicating the Carma Bayshore LLC replat of Lots 1-48,
Block 2; Lots 1-22 Bloc 5, Tracts A and E all within Section 35, T3N, R68W is within the St. Vrain
Sanitation District 208 service area end will be served contingent upon submission of required
documents, payment of fees and subject to the St. Vrain Sanitation District policy and Rules and
Regulations. In a referral response from the Colorado Division of Water Resources dated
November 12, 2014, the Division started that the "Bayshore Lakes, (WDID 0503307), and
Bayshore Diversion (WDID 0500646), appropriative right of exchange from the St. Vrain
Sanitation District's Wastewater Treatment Plant outfall to the Bayshore Diversion, and plan for
augmentation were decreed in Division 1 Water Court case no. 2005CW0263. The lining of the
Bayshore Lakes was breached during the September 2013 flood. Therefore, the applicant will
need to obtain another approved letter for the Bayshore Lakes, nka Barefoot Lakes prior to using
water from the lakes for irrigation purposes. The proposed uses are allowed by the decree.
Pursuant to § 30-28-136(1)(h)(II), C.R.S., it is the opinion of the State Engineer's office that the
proposed water supply will not cause injury to existing water rights so long as the Little Thompson
Water District operates according to the terms and conditions of its current plan for
augmentation." No additional concerns have been raised from referral agencies regarding the
adequacy of services to the site.
B. Section 27-7-40.C.2--That the uses which would be allowed in the proposed PUD will conform
with the performance standards of the PUD Zone District contained in Article II, Chapter 27 of the
Weld County Code.
The applicants were granted a deviation from the twenty performance standards as delineated in
Chapter 27, Article II. The Board of County Commissioners approved deviations specific to
access requirements, bulk standards for R-2, R-3 and R-4 Zone Districts and C-1, C-2 Zone
Districts; internal circulation requirements and compatibility at the December 6, 2006 Final Plan
under PF-1078 The applicants have met the remaining Performance Standards as delineated in
Section 27-2-10. The Conditions of Approval ensure compliance with Sections 27-2-20 through
Section 27-2-220 of the Weld County Code. The applicants have existing Improvements (Private
Road Maintenance) (2006-1915) and an Off-site Improvements Agreement (Public Road
Maintenance) (2007-2154) for the paving of County Road 9.5. The Agreements will be required to
be amended and accepted by the Board of County Commissioners prior to recording the Final
Plan. All other Performance Standards have been addressed prior to the Final Plan.
C. Section 27-7-40.C.3 --That the uses which would be permitted will be compatible with the
existing or future development of the surrounding area as permitted by the existing zoning,
and with the future development as projected by Chapter 22 of the Weld County Code or
master plans of affected municipalities. The proposed site does not lie within an Urban
Growth Area, nor is the applicant proposing an Urban Scale Development. Weld County's
Right to Farm has been attached to the Final Plat thus informing any new residents that the
area of the surrounding community is agricultural in nature. This proposal is located within the
referral boundary of the City of Longmont, Town of Firestone, Town of Mead and Town of
Frederick. The City of Longmont returned a referral dated January 29, 2015 and indicated no
conflicts with their interests. No other municipal referrals were received. The Department of
Planning Services believes that the granting of this PUD Final Plan will have a minimal
impact on the surrounding land uses.
D. Section 27-7-40.C.4 --That adequate water and sewer service will be made available to the
site to serve the uses permitted within the proposed PUD in compliance with the performance
standards in Article II, Chapter 27 of the Weld County Code.
E. Section 27-7-40.C.5 -- That street or highway facilities providing access to the property are
adequate in functional classification, width, and structural capacity to meet the traffic
requirements of the uses of the proposed PUD Zone District. The Weld County Departments
of Planning Engineering and Public Works reviewed this request and has indicated
conditional approval of the proposed plan. The applicants prior to recording the Final Plan,
must enter into an Improvements and Road Maintenance Agreement for onsite and offsite
improvements. Collateral needs to be submitted to and accepted by the Weld County Board
of County Commissioners prior to recording of the plat.
F. Section 27-7-40.C.6 — In the event the street or highway facilities are not adequate, the
applicant shall supply information which demonstrates the willingness and financial capacity
to upgrade the street or highway facilities in conformance with the Transportation Sections of
Chapters 22, 24 and 26, if applicable.
The applicant is required to enter into an Off-site Improvements Agreement for pavement of
County Road 9.5. The Agreement will be required to be approved and accepted by the Board
of County Commissioners prior to recording the final plat.
G. Section 27-7-40.C.7 -- That there has been compliance with the applicable requirements
contained in Chapter 23 of the Weld County Code regarding overlay districts, commercial
mineral deposits, and soil conditions on the subject site.
Conditions of Approval and Development Standards ensure that soil conditions shall be
considered when placing structures on site. Surface Use Agreements have been reached
with all oil and gas interests on site. A mineral development for gravel extraction was located
on the site and has since been released from the bond for the gravel operation. The mining
is complete and on-going reclamation of the waters edge is being undertaking by the
applicant.
The applicant shall submit a Floodplain Development Permit (FHDP) for all development
activities located within the special flood hazard area. The FEMA definition of development is
any man-made change to improved or unimproved real estate, including by not limited to
buildings or other structures, mining, dredging, filling, grading, paving, excavation, drilling
operations, or storage of equipment and materials.
Building Permits issued will be required to adhere to the fee structure of the County-wide
Road Impact Program.
Building Permits issued will be required to adhere to the fee structure of the County Facility
Fee and Drainage Impact Fee Programs.
H. Section 27-7-40.C.8--If compatibility exists between the proposed uses and criteria listed in
the development guide, and the final plan exactly conforms to the development guide. The
proposed PUD Final Plan uses are compatible with the criteria listed in the developmental
guide.
This recommendation is based, in part, upon a review of the application materials submitted by
the applicant, other relevant information regarding the request, and responses from referral
agencies.
The Department of Planning Services' Staff recommendation for approval is conditional upon the
following:
1. Prior to Recording the PUD Final Plat:
A. County Road 28 has been annexed by the Town of Mead. The Town has jurisdiction over all
accesses within their jurisdiction. Please contact Town to verify the access permit or for any
additional requirement that may be needed to obtain or upgrade the permit. (Department of
Planning Services- Engineer)
B. An updated Traffic Impact Study shall be completed by a Colorado Registered Professional
Engineer following the checklist available on the Public Works website. (Department of
Planning Services- Engineer)
C. Prior to recording the Final Plat, the applicant must enter into an updated Improvements and
Road Maintenance Agreement for onsite and offsite improvements. Collateral needs to be
submitted to and accepted by the Weld County Board of County Commissioners prior to
recording of the plat. Previously accepted collateral (2006-1915 and 2007-2154) was
obtained for PF-1078, Final Plan for St. Vrain Lakes PUD. (Department of Planning
Services - Engineer)
D. A Final Drainage Report and Weld County Certificate of Compliance stamped and signed by
a Professional Engineer registered in the State of Colorado is required. (Department of
Planning Services- Engineer)
E. Accepted Final Road Plans stamped and signed by a Professional Engineer registered in
the State of Colorado is required prior to recording the Final map. (Department of Planning
Services - Engineer)
F. All construction or improvements occurring in a FEMA regulatory floodplain delineated by
FEMA Shall comply with Overlay District requirements of Chapter 23, Article V, Division 2 of
the Weld County Code. A Floodplain Development Permit is required for development within
the Floodplain. (Department of Planning Services - Floodplain)
G. Address the referral comments from Planning-Engineering dated December 11, 2014.
(Department of Planning Services - Engineer)
H. Final grading, drainage construction, erosion and sediment control plans, and water quality
control plans (conforming to the Drainage Report) stamped, signed, and dated by a
professional engineer licensed in the State of Colorado shall be submitted to the Department
of Planning Services - Engineer. Written evidence of acceptance of this report shall be
submitted to the Department of Planning Services. (Department of Planning Services -
Engineer)
The Final Construction Plans must legibly show sufficient detail at an appropriate scale to
see proposed finished floor elevations in relation to the 100-year maximum water surface
elevations in the adjacent channels and swales. Drainage easements per the Utility Board
recommendations shall be delineated on the approved plans. (Department of Planning
Services - Engineer)
J. As-Built Construction Plans including survey data and plans of all drainage facilities,
including all storm drain pipes, headwalls, inlets, swales, detention pond outlet structures
giving locations and elevations of key features, shall be submitted in digital format to Weld
County upon completion and final acceptance by the County. (Department of Planning
Services - Engineer)
K. The applicant shall submit three complete copies of the covenants for the Barefoot Lakes
PUD for review and approval by County Staff. (Department of Planning Services)
L. The applicant shall submit evidence that the Weld County Attorney's Office has reviewed the
Restrictive Covenants and Home Owners Association Incorporation paperwork for Barefoot
Lakes PUD. Any changes requested by the Weld County Attorney's Office shall be
incorporated. (Department of Planning Services)
M. The applicant shall submit finalized copies and the appropriate fee ($11.00 for the first page
and $5.00 for each additional page) to the Department of Planning Services for recording
the Restrictive Covenants for Barefoot Lakes PUD in the Office of the Clerk and Recorder.
(Department of Planning Services)
N. The applicant shall submit to the Department of Planning Services Certificates from the
Secretary of State showing the Barefoot Lakes PUD Homeowners Associations have been
formed and registered with the state. (Department of Planning Services)
O. A Signing Plan per the current edition of the MUTCD is required as part of the final roadway
plans. The Signing Plan may include street names, stop, yield, no outlet or other associated
subdivision signing. Written evidence of Planning Services - Engineer approval shall be
submitted to the Department of Planning Services. (Department of Planning Services)
P. The applicant shall submit written evidence to the Department of Planning Services that the
cash-in-lieu fees have been paid to the St. Vrain Valley School District. (Department of
Planning Services)
Q. The applicant shall provide written evidence to the Department of Planning and graphic
evidence from the Saint Vrain School District and Post Office of jurisdiction, that the
proposed mailbox location and bus shelter plan meets design standards and delivery
requirements, and the proposed school drop off/pick up location shall be approved by the
School District. Written evidence of compliance with their standards and requirements shall
be submitted to the Department of Planning Services. Further, evidence shall be provided
that each facility meets the intent of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) for access.
The Department of Building Inspection shall review the proposed structure for compliance
with all applicable codes as warranted. Evidence of approval shall be submitted to the
Department of Planning Services. (Department of Planning Services)
R. The applicant shall submit copies of finalized water and sewer agreements with St. Vrain
Sanitation and the Little Thompson Water District. (Department of Planning Services)
S. The applicant shall provide the Department of Planning Services with a deed for recording
with the Final Plat as evidence that the open space and mineral rights are deeded to the
Metropolitan District. (Department of Planning Services)
T. The applicant shall submit written evidence to the Department of Planning that all of the
concerns of the Department of Planning Services - Engineer have been addressed. Written
evidence for approval shall be submitted to the Department of Planning Services.
(Department of Planning Services)
U. The applicant has provided a Conceptual Landscape Plan for review as to form, hierarchy
and visual interest. The applicant shall provide a detailed Landscape Plan addressing: the
Street Tree Palette, the programmed open space, the linkages and landscape corridors, and
the areas not subject to a Site Plan Review (Commercial designated areas). The Open
Space/Landscape Plan shall be delineated per Section 24-3-50.G of the Weld County Code.
The Plan shall be submitted to the Department of Planning Services for review and
approval. (Department of Planning Services)
V. The applicant shall provide additional information pertaining to the plant materials, including
common, botanical and species names, size at installation, and any additional information
deemed necessary. The documentation shall be submitted to the Department of Planning
Services. (Department of Planning Services)
W. The applicant shall submit a re-vegetation plan of all areas disturbed during construction.
The plan shall include information regarding plant type, installation methods, and
maintenance. (Department of Planning Services)
X. The applicant shall demonstrate how the proposed plant material will be watered. Further,
the applicant shall provide evidence that the tap from the Little Thompson Water District is
permitted to provide irrigation water to the landscaped areas. The documentation shall be
submitted to the Department of Planning Services for review and approval. (Department of
Planning Services)
Y. The applicant has indicated that a water tap will be used to water landscaping. The applicant
shall submit evidence that the tap has been conveyed to the Metropolitan District.
(Department of Planning Services)
Z. The applicant shall present a unanimous petition of all landowners and residents of the St.
Vrain Lakes PUD registered to vote in the State of Colorado thus qualifying the
Development for inclusion into the Southwest Weld County Law Enforcement Authority
(SWCLEA) (if it has been created) or for creation of a separate Law Enforcement Authority
(LEA) (if it was not created). A LEA is a taxing unit with a maximum mill levy of 7 mills
created for the purpose of providing additional law enforcement by the county sheriff to the
residents of the developed or developing unincorporated Weld County. The revenues would
be available initially to provide directed patrols and eventually to provide additional deputies
to carry out those activities within the LEA. This is intended to offset the demand for law
enforcement generated by increased population densities. (Department of Planning
Services)
AA. The Plat shall be amended to include the following:
1. All sheets of the Final Plat shall be labeled PUDF14-0009, First Filing.
(Department of Planning Services)
2. The Final Plat shall be in compliance with Section 27-9-20 of the Weld County
Code. (Department of Planning Services)
3. Common-use areas shall be delineated on the Final Plat. (Department of Public
Health and Environment)
4. Passive and active recreational uses shall be defined on the plat. (Department of
Public Health and Environment)
5. All utility easements shall be indicated on the plat as approved by the Weld
County Utility Advisory Committee. (Utility Advisory Committee)
6. The Weld County's Right to Farm shall be placed on the plat, Section 22-2-20.J
A.Goal 10, as amended, of the Weld County Code. (Department of Planning
Services)
7. County Road 9 '/ is designated on the Weld County Road Classification Plan as
a paved arterial road, which requires 140 feet of right-of-way (ROW) at full build
out. The applicant shall verify the existing right-of-way and the documents
creating the right-of-way and this information shall be noted on the map. All
setbacks shall be measured from the edge of future right-of-way. If the existing
right-of-way cannot be verified, it shall be dedicated. This road is maintained by
Weld County. (Department of Planning Services - Engineer)
8. Show the approved access(es) on the plat and label with the approved access
permit number (AP14-00506) (Department of Planning Services - Engineer)
9. County Road 28 has been annexed by the Town of Mead. The Town has
jurisdiction over all accesses within their jurisdiction. Contact Town to verify the
access permit or for any additional requirement that may be needed to obtain or
upgrade the permit. Evidence of approval by the Town of Mead shall be
submitted in writing to the Department of Planning Services. (Department of
Public Works)
10. The applicant shall submit a Stormwater Maintenance Plan to the Department of
Planning Services-Engineering. (Department of Public Works)
11. Show and label the floodplain and floodway(if applicable) boundaries on the plat.
Label the floodplain boundaries with the FEMA Flood Zone and FEMA Map
Panel Number and, or FEMA approved CLOMR. (Department of Planning
Services— Engineer, Department of Planning Services - Floodplain)
12. The applicant shall delineate the locations of the accepted Saint Vrain School
District and Post Office of jurisdiction proposed bus shelter(s) and mailbox
location(s). (Department of Planning Services)
13. All internal local road rights-of-way shall be approved by Weld County
Department of Public Works and dedicated to the public. (Department of Public
Works)
14. No. 3 Ditch, the Highland Ditch, and the Hayseed Ditch must be appropriately
labeled and dimensioned, including setbacks. (Department of Planning Services)
BB. The applicant shall submit a digital file of all drawings associated with the Final Plan
application. Acceptable CAD formats are .dwg, .dxf, and .dgn (Microstation); acceptable
GIS formats are ArcView shapefiles, Arclnfo Coverages and Arclnfo Export files format
type is .e00. The preferred format for Images is .tif (Group 4). (Group 6 is not
acceptable). (Department of Planning Services)
2. The Final Plat is conditional upon the following and that each be placed on the Final Plat as notes
prior to recording:
A. The Final Plat, First Filing for two hundred forty-three (243) lots with R-1 (Low Density
Residential); C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial); C-2 (General Commercial) Zone Uses
and continuing Oil and Gas Production Uses along with approximately 10 acres of open
space consisting of a river corridor, private recreational lakes and community parks in the
1-25 Regional Urbanization Area Overlay District - Barefoot Lakes PUD, as indicated in
the application materials on file, and subject to, and governed by, the Conditions of
Approval stated hereon and all applicable Weld County regulations.
B. Approval of this plan may create a vested property right pursuant to Section 23-8-10 of
the Weld County Code. (Department of Planning Services)
C. The Bulk Standards Requirement, as delineated in Section 23-3-160, Table 23.4, for R-1
Zone Districts. (Department of Planning Services
D. The Open Space lots are non-buildable for residential structures or structures providing
habitable space. (Department of Planning Services
E. Water service shall be obtained from the Little Thompson Water District. (Department of
Public Health and Environment)
F. Sewer service shall be obtained from the Saint Vrain Sanitation District. (Department of
Public Health and Environment)
G. Permanent restroom and hand washing facilities shall be provided within easy access of
all public gathering areas. At a minimum, permanent vaulted restroom facilities shall be
placed around the lake. A vault facility, similar to a rest area or park service facility, is
recommended. (Department of Public Health and Environment)
H. The recreational uses on the lakes will be subject to the water quality standards of the
Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Swimming Pool and Mineral
Bath Regulations. (Department of Public Health and Environment)
A Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Construction Stormwater
Discharge Permit will be required for a development/ redevelopment/construction site
where a contiguous or non-contiguous land disturbance is greater than, or equal to, one
(1) acre in area. The applicant shall contact the Colorado Department of Public Health
and Environment, Water Quality Control Division, at
www.cdphe.state.co.us/wq/PermitsUnit for more information. (Department of Public
Health and Environment)
J. During development of the site, all land disturbances shall be conducted so that nuisance
conditions are not created. If dust emissions create nuisance conditions, at the request
of the Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment, a Fugitive Dust
Control Plan must be submitted. (Department of Public Health and Environment)
K. In accordance with the Regulations of the Colorado Air Quality Control Commission, any
development that disturbs more than five (5) acres of land must incorporate all available
and practical methods that are technologically feasible and economically reasonable in
order to minimize dust emissions. (Department of Public Health and Environment)
L. If land development creates more than a 25-acre contiguous disturbance, or exceeds six
(6) months in duration, the responsible party shall prepare a Fugitive Dust Control Plan,
submit an Air Pollution Emissions Notice, and apply for a Permit from the Colorado
Department of Public Health and Environment. (Department of Public Health and
Environment)
M. Should noxious weeds exist on the property, or become established as a result of the
proposed development, the applicant/landowner shall be responsible for controlling the
noxious weeds, pursuant to Chapter 15, Articles I and II, of the Weld County Code.
(Department of Planning Services - Engineer)
N. The historical flow patterns and run-off amounts will be maintained in such a manner that
it will reasonably preserve the natural character of the area and prevent property damage
of the type generally attributed to run-off rate and velocity increases, diversions,
concentration and/or unplanned ponding of storm run-off. (Department of Planning
Services - Engineer)
O. The stormwater facilities shall be maintained in accordance with the approved
Stormwater Maintenance Plan. (Department of Planning Services - Engineer)
P. Weld County is not responsible for the maintenance of onsite drainage related features.
(Department of Planning Services - Engineer)
Q. All construction or improvements occurring in the floodplain or floodway as delineated on
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) FIRM Community Panel Map #
080266-0850C dated September 28, 1982 and as revised with the St. Vrain Lakes
CLOMR shown on Panel Map # 08123C-1890E of the Preliminary Maps, shall comply
with all applicable Weld County requirements, Colorado Water Conservation Board
requirements as described in Rules and Regulations for Regulatory Floodplains in
Colorado, and FEMA regulations and requirements as described in 44 CFR parts 59, 60,
and 65. (Department of Planning Services - Floodplain)
R. Floodplain development permits will be required for development activities located within
the special flood hazard area. The FEMA definition of development is any man-made
change to improved or unimproved real estate, including by not limited to buildings or
other structures, mining, dredging, filling, grading, paving, excavation, drilling operations,
or storage of equipment and materials. (Department of Planning Services - Floodplain)
S. FEMA's floodplain boundaries may be updated at any time by FEMA. Prior to the start of
any development activities, the owner should contact Weld County to determine if the
floodplain boundaries have been modified. (Department of Planning Services -
Floodplain)
T. Weld County's Right to Farm Statement, as provided in Section 22-2-20.J A.Goal 10 of
the Weld County Code, shall be recognized at all times. (Department of Planning
Services)
U. There are Confined Animal Feeding Operations in close proximity to this development.
Residents should be made aware that there may be traffic, noise, flies, and odors
associated with these activities. (Department of Planning Services)
V. A Metropolitan District shall be established prior to the sale of any lot. The District is
responsible for liability insurance, taxes and maintenance of open space, streets, private
utilities, and other facilities. Open space restrictions are permanent. (Department of
Planning Services)
W. The Southwestern Weld County Law Enforcement District shall be established prior to
the sale of any lot. (Department of Planning Services)
X. Intersection sight distance triangles at development entrances will be required. All
landscaping within the triangles must be less then 3.5 feet in height a maturity.
(Department of Planning Services - Engineer)
Y. All signs, including entrance signs, shall require building permits. Signs shall adhere to
the approved Sign Plan. (Department of Planning Services)
Z. Building Permits issued on the proposed lots will be required to adhere to the fee
structure of the County-wide Road Impact Fee Program
AA. Building Permits issued on the proposed lots, will be required to adhere to the fee
structure of the County Facility Fee and Drainage Impact Fee Programs.
BB. A building permit will be required, for any new construction or set up manufactured
structure, per Section 29-3-10 of the Weld County Code. A building permit application
must be completed and submitted. Buildings and structures shall conform to the
requirements of the various codes adopted at the time of permit application. Currently the
following has been adopted by Weld County: 2006 International Residential Building
Code; 2012 International Energy Code; 2006 International 2011 National Electrical Code;
and Chapter 29 of the Weld County Code. A plan review shall be approved and a permit
must be issued prior to the start of construction. (Department of Building Inspection)
CC. Installation of utilities shall comply with Section 24-9-10 of the Weld County Code.
(Department of Planning Services)
DD. Necessary personnel from the Weld County Departments of Planning Services, Public
Works, and Public Health and Environment shall be granted access onto the property at
any reasonable time in order to ensure the activities carried out on the property comply
with the Conditions of Approval and Development Standards stated herein and all
applicable Weld County regulations. (Department of Planning Services)
EE. Building height shall be measured in accordance with the 2006 International Building
Code for the purpose of determining the maximum building size and height for various
uses and types of construction, and to determine compliance with the Bulk requirements
from Chapter 23 of the Weld County Code. Building height shall be measured in
accordance with Chapter 23 of the Weld County Code to determine compliance with
offset and setback requirements. Offset and setback distances are measured from the
farthest projection from the building, a minimum of ten feet for a front yard setback as
requested by the applicant for side loaded and alley loaded single family residences.
Property lines shall be clearly identified, and all property pins shall be staked prior to the
first site inspection. (Department of Building Inspection)
FF. The applicant shall supply evidence to the Department of Planning Services that all
requirements of the Mountain View Fire Protection District have been met. .
(Department of Building Inspection)
GG. The property owner shall be responsible for complying with the Performance Standards
of Chapter 27, Articles II and VIII, of the Weld County Code. (Department of Planning
Services)
HH. The site shall maintain compliance at all times with the requirements of the Weld County
Departments of Public Works, Public Health and Environment, and Planning Services,
and adopted Weld County Code and policies. (Department of Planning Services)
The operation shall comply with all applicable rules and regulations of the State and
Federal agencies and the Weld County Code. (Department of Public Health and
Environment)
JJ. The PUD Final Plan shall comply with all regulations and requirements of Chapter 27 of
the Weld County Code. (Department of Planning Services)
KK. The applicant shall comply with Section 27-8-50 of the Weld County Code, as follows:
Failure to submit a Planned Unit Development Final Plan - If a PUD Final Plan application
is not submitted within three (3) years of the date of the approval of the PUD Zone
District, the Board of County Commissioners shall require the landowner to appear before
it and present evidence substantiating that the PUD project has not been abandoned and
that the applicant possesses the willingness and ability to continue with the submission of
the PUD Final Plan. The Board may extend the date for the submission of the PUD Final
Plan application and shall annually require the applicant to demonstrate that the PUD has
not been abandoned. If the Board determines that conditions or statements made
supporting the original approval of the PUD Zone District have changed, or that the
landowner cannot implement the PUD Final Plan, the Board of County Commissioners
may, at a public hearing, revoke the PUD Zone District and order the recorded PUD Zone
District reverted to the original Zone District.
LL. Section 27-8-60 of the Weld County Code - Failure to Record a Planned Unit
Development Final Plan - If a Final Plan plat has not been recorded within one (1) year
of the date of the approval of the PUD Final Plan, or within a date specified by the Board
of County Commissioners, the Board may require the landowner to appear before it and
present evidence substantiating that the PUD Final Plan has not been abandoned and
that the applicant possesses the willingness and ability to record the PUD Final Plan plat.
The Board may extend the date for recording the plat. If the Board determines that
conditions supporting the original approval of the PUD Final Plan cannot be met, the
Board may, after a public hearing, revoke the PUD Final Plan.
MM. Section 27-8-70 of the Weld County Code - Failure to Commence a Planned Unit
Development Final Plan - If no construction has begun or no USE established in the
PUD within one (1) year of the date of the approval of the PUD Final Plan, the Board of
County Commissioners may require the landowner to appear before the it and present
evidence substantiating that the PUD Final Plan has not been abandoned and that the
applicant possesses the willingness and ability to continue the PUD. The Board may
extend the date for initiation of the PUD construction and shall annually require the
applicant to demonstrate that the PUD has not been abandoned. If the Board determines
that conditions supporting the original approval of the PUD Final Plan have changed or
that the landowner cannot implement the PUD Final Plan, the Board may, after a public
hearing, revoke the PUD Final Plan and order the recorded PUD Plan vacated.
NN. Section 27-8-80.A of the Weld County Code - Failure to Comply with the PUD Final Plan
- The Board of County Commissioners may serve written notice upon such organization
or upon the owners or residents of the PUD setting forth that the organization has failed
to comply with the PUD Final Plan. Said notice shall include a demand that such
deficiencies of maintenance be cured within thirty (30) days thereof. A hearing shall be
held by the Board within fifteen (15) days of the issuance of such notice, setting forth the
item, date and place of the hearing. The Board may modify the terms of the original
notice as to deficiencies and may give an extension of time within which they shall be
rectified.
OO. The PUD Final Plan shall comply with all regulations and requirements of Chapter 27 of
the Weld County Code. (Department of Planning Services)
PP. Section 27-8-80.B of the Weld County Code -Any PUD Zone District approved in a Final
Plan shall be considered as being in compliance with Chapter 24 of the Weld County
Code and Section 30-28-101, et seq., CRS.
QQ. No development activity shall commence, nor shall any building permits be issued on the
property until the final plan has been approved and recorded. (Department of Planning
Services)
RR. The Final plat map shall be submitted to the Department of Planning Services for
recording within ninety (90) days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners.
With the Final plat map, the applicant shall submit a digital file of all drawings associated
with the Change of Zone application. Acceptable CAD formats are .dwg, .dxf, and .dgn
(Microstation); acceptable GIS formats are .shp (Shape Files), Arclnfo Coverages and
Arclnfo Export files format type is .e00. The preferred format for Images is .tif(Group 4).
(Group 6 is not acceptable).
SS. In accordance with Weld County Code Ordinance 2005-7, approved June 1, 2005, should
the plat not be recorded within the required thirty (30) days from the date of the Board of
County Commissioners Resolution, a $50.00 recording continuance charge may be
added for each additional three (3) month period.
3. Upon completion of 1 and 2 above, the applicant shall submit two (2) paper copies of the plat for
preliminary approval to the Weld County Department of Planning Services. Upon approval of the
paper copies the applicant shall submit a Mylar plat along with all other documentation required
as conditions of approval. The Mylar plat shall be recorded in the office of the Weld County Clerk
and Recorder by Department of Planning Services= Staff. The plat shall be prepared in
accordance with the requirements of the Weld County Code. The Mylar plat and additional
requirements shall be submitted within thirty (30) days from the date of the Board of County
Commissioners resolution. The applicant shall be responsible for paying the recording fee.
4. Prior to Construction:
A. If more than 1 acre is to be disturbed, a Weld County grading permit will be required prior
to the start of construction. Contact the Planning Department for application information.
(Department of Planning Services - Engineer)
5. Prior to the release of any building permits:
A. The applicant shall supply the required street signs and stop signs at appropriate
locations. (Department of Planning Services- Engineer)
B. The applicant shall supply evidence to the Department of Planning Services that all
requirements of the Mountain View Fire Protection District have been met. (Department
of Planning Services)
C. Prior to the commencement of construction activities, Stormwater Erosion Control and
Sediment Control Best Management Practices shall be in place in accordance with
approved permits, plans, Weld County Code, and Urban Drainage Standards. Silt fences
shall be maintained on the down gradient portion of the site during all phases of the site
construction.
D. The applicant shall contact the Mountain View Fire Protection District for review and
approval of all access roads. Evidence of Fire District approval shall be submitted to the
Department of Building Inspections prior to construction on the site. (Mountain View Fire
Protection District)
E. The applicant shall submit street construction plans for the utilities showing the location of
fire hydrants, the size of water mains and available fire flows to the Mountain View Fire
Protection District for review and approval. Evidence of Fire District approval shall be
submitted to the Department of Building Inspections prior to construction on the site.
(Mountain View Fire Protection District)
F. Stop signs and street name signs including address ranges will be required at all
intersections. If standard street signs are not used, the sign type must be submitted to
Mountain View Fire Protection for review. (Mountain View Fire Protection District)
G. The applicant shall submit an eight and one-half inch by eleven inch map showing street
configuration, street names, hydrant locations and addresses of the lots to the Mountain
View Fire Protection District. (Mountain View Fire Protection District)
H. All single-family residences shall have a legible address that is clearly visible from the
street fronting the property. The address numbers shall contrast with their background.
(Mountain View Fire Protection District)
The applicant shall submit a Floodplain Development Permit (FHDP) for all development
activities located within the special flood hazard area. The FEMA definition of
development is any man-made change to improved or unimproved real estate, including
by not limited to buildings or other structures, mining, dredging, filling, grading, paving,
excavation, drilling operations, or storage of equipment and materials. (Department of
Planning Services)
N DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES
' k " 1555 N 17th AVE
j , ^ GREELEY, CO 80631
WEBSITE: www.co.weld.co.us
E-MAIL: kogle@co.weld.co.us
r, PHONE: (970)353-6100, Ext. 3549
N
' FAX: (970)304-6498
October 27, 2014
SAVELA MARC
188 INVERNESS DRIVE WEST, STE 150
ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112
Subject: PUDF14-0009 - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FINAL PLAT - AMENDMENT TO FIRST
FILING, PF-1078 - REPLAT OF LOTS 1-32, BLOCK 7; LOTS 1-11, BLOCK 8; LOTS 1-14 BLOCK 9;
LOTS 10-17, BLOCK 10; LOTS 1-7, BLOCK 14 AND TRACT H AND THE VACATION OF LAKE
CATAMOUNT PARKWAY BETWEEN COUNTY ROAD 9.5 AND EAGLE RIVER ROAD; THE
VACATION OF PLATTE RIVER DRIVE BETWEEN ELK RIVER ROAD AND LAKE CATAMOUNT
DRIVE; GRAND LAKE DRIVE BETWEEN ELK RIVER ROAD AND LAKE CATAMOUNT DRIVE;
MAGGIE COURT BETWEEN EMERALD LAKE DRIVE AND EMERALD LAKE DRIVE; SAMANTHA
PLACE BETWEEN WILLOW CREEK RUN AND WILLOW CREEK RUN; WILLOW CREEK RUN
BETWEEN EMERAL LAKE DRIVE AND WILLOW CREEK RUN; EMERALD LAKE DRIVE BETWEEN
YAMPA RIVER ROAD AND WILLOW CREEK RUN; WANEKA LAKE COUNRT BETWEEN PIEDRA
RIVER ROAD AND PIEDRA RIVER ROAD; CLEAR CREEK DRIVE BETWEEN LAKE CATAMOUNT
PARKWAY AND PIEDRA RIVER ROAD; PIEDRA RIVER ROAD BETWEEN CLEAR CREEK DRIVE
AND EAGLE RIVER ROAD; ESCALANTE CREEK COURT BETWEEN MERIDIAN LAKE DRIVE AND
MERIDIAN LAKE DRIVE; MERIDIAN LAKE DRIVE BETWEEN ESCALANTE CREEK COURT AND
YAMPA RIVER ROAD; SQUIRREL CREEK COURT BETWEEN YAMPA RIVER ROAD AND YAMPA
RIVER ROAD; YAMPA RIVER ROAD BETWEEN EAGLE RIVER ROAD AND EAGLE RIVER ROAD;
FISH CREEK WAY BETWEEN CANADIAN RIVER ROAD AND YAMPA RIVER ROAD; CANADIAN
RIVER ROAD BETWEEN EAGLE RIVER ROAD AND YAMPA RIVER ROAD; CASTLE CREEK WAY
BETWEEN EAGLE RIVER RIAD AND YAMPA RIVER ROAD; TRINCHERA CREEK ROAD BETWEEN
BAYSHORE DRIVE AND BAYSHORE DRIVE; MIRAMONTE LAKE CIRCLE BETWEEN BAYSHORE
DRIVE AND BAYSHORE DIRVE; BAYSHORE DRIVE BETWEEN EAGLE RIVER ROAD AND YAMPA
RIVER ROAD; BAYSHORE DRIVE BETWEEN COUNTY ROAD 9.5 AND EAGLE RIVER ROAD;
CIMMARON RIVER ROAD BETWEEN FOUNTAIN CREEK DRIVE AND COLORADO RIVER ROAD;
FOUNTAIN CREEK DRIVE BETWEEN COLORADO RIVER ROAD AND CIMMARON RIVER ROAD;
COLORADO RIVER ROAD BETWEEN FOUNTAIN CREEK DRIVE AND CIMMARON RIVER ROAD;
ELK RIVER ROAD BETWEEN ST. VRAIN RIVER ROAD AND CIMMARON RIVER ROAD; ST VRAIN
RIVER ROAD BETWEEN ELK RIVER ROAD AND CIMMARON RIVER ROAD; AND LAKE
CATAMOUNT PARKWAY BETWEEN EAGLE RIVER ROAD AND YAMPA RIVER ROAD.
On parcel(s)of land described as:
ST VRAIN LAKES FG#1; Part of Sections 25, 35, and 36, T3N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County,
Colorado.
Dear Applicants:
Your application and related materials for the request described above are complete and in order at this
time. I will schedule a meeting with you at the end of the review period to discuss the referral
comments received by our office.
It is the policy of Weld County to refer an application of this nature to any town or municipality lying
within three miles of the property in question or if the property under consideration is located within the
comprehensive planning area of a town or municipality. Therefore, our office has forwarded a copy of
the submitted materials to the following Planning Commission(s)for their review and comments:
Page 2 of 2
Frederick at Phone Number 720-382-5500
Longmont at Phone Number 303-651-8601
Mead at Phone Number 970-535-4477
Please call the listed Planning Commissions, for information regarding the date, time and place of the
meeting and the review process. It is recommended that you and/or a representative be in attendance at
each of the meetings described above in order to answer any questions that might arise with respect to
your application.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please call.
Respectfully,
Digitally signed by Kristine Ranslem
IasDn:lam the author ofthisdocument
Date:2014.10.27 11:49:47-06'00'
Kim Ogle
Planner
Design Workshop, Inc. Memorandum
Landscape Architecture
To: Weld County
Planning
Urban Design From: Design Workshop
Date: February 4, 2015
Project Name: Barefoot Lakes
Project #: 5062
Subject: Response to Comments
Copy To:
Weld County
From: Jennifer Petrik
Date: November 24, 2014
Document Type : Memorandum
Comments:
1 . This site is east of I-25 north of SH119. Barefoot Lakes Filing No. 1 is a proposed re-
subdivision to a portion of the St. Vrain Lakes Filing No. 1 final plan. Barefoot Lakes
Filing No. 1 will include seven (7) construction phases in total. The first construction
phase will be based on the approved St Vrain Lakes Subdivision plans providing sixty
three (63) single family residential lots. Subsequent phases based on the Barefoot Lakes
re-plat will include two-hundred forty (240) single family residential lots with three lots
that will be reserved for future development in accordance with the PUD. The underlying
area was previously platted with a total of two-hundred fifty one (251) single family
residential lots and 16.0 acre of townhome density at 12 d.u. per acre for a total of 192
townhome units. This plan will result in a net increase in single family units of 46 lots in
exchange for a reduction of 192 townhome units.
a. Noted.
Comments — Roads:
1 . CR 9 '/2 is owned and maintained by Weld County and is shown as an Arterial roadway.
The internal roadway system of the subdivision requires
a. Noted. The initial phase of CR 9 %2 was constructed in 2007 as a requirement of
the St. Vrain Lakes Filing No. 1 Subdivision Plat.
2. CR28 is owned and maintained by the Town of Mead.
a. Noted.
3. Traffic Counts for 9 '/2 are as follows: 11 /6/13 2903 ADT, 1 /20/11 2182 ADT.
a. Noted.
4. The internal roadway is required to be maintained by the Home Owners Association and
dedicated as public right of way. For internal roadway design, 60ft right of way is
required.
i. Weld County 1-25 Parallel Arterial Study: (September 2003)
a. The internal dedicated public rights-of-way will be maintained by the
Metropolitan District, unless they are annexed to a local municipality where
they will be maintained by the municipality.
5. CR 91/2 is classified by the County as a major arterial road and requires a 140-foot right-
of-way. There is presently a 60-foot right-of-way. This road is maintained by Weld
County. Pursuant to the definition of SETBACK in the Weld County Zoning (23- 1 -90),
the required setback is measured from the future right-of-way line. The applicant shall
delineate or dedicate an additional 40-foot of right-of-way parallel to the CR 91/2 right-of-
way for future build-out.
a. Portions of right-of-way for CR 9 1/2 were previously dedicated by the St. Vrain
Lakes and St. Acacius Subdivisions. The full width of right-of-way exists
between the St. Vrain River and the south property line of St. Acacius. North of
this location and along the Brookfield/Barefoot Lakes property (east side), a
half width (70-f1) of right-of-way has been previously dedicated. Along the St.
Acacius property (west side), a 50-fl wide portion of the ultimate half width has
been provided. Based on the full width cross-section of CR 9 %2, an additional
20-ft of right-of-way will be required from St. Acacius.
6. Easements shall be shown in accordance with County standards (Sec. 24-7-60) and/or
Utility Board recommendations.
a. Noted
7. Intersection sight distance triangles at accesses/entrances will be required. All
landscaping within the triangles must be less than 21/2 feet in height at maturity, and
noted.
a. Noted. The requested sight distance triangles are provided on the final
subdivision plat.
8. Stop signs and street name signs will be required at all intersections and shown as a
signing plan on final roadway plans. The current edition of the Manual on Uniform
Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) shall govern the signing plan.
1-25 RUA Roadway Standards: (July 2004)
a. The requested information can be found on Construction Plan Sheets C6.0 and
C6. 1 .
9. Any internal collector road right-of-way shall be eighty (80) feet in width and dedicated
to the public. Currently, the typical roadway section of interior roadway shall be shown
as two 12-foot paved lanes with 8-foot paved parking lanes (the final traffic impact study
shall also be reviewed for interior roadway cross-sections). The RUA criteria require
curb, gutter, and sidewalk.
a. Please refer to the Change of Zone document for the required road sections. The
Construction Plans are consistent with these sections. One exception is Barefoot
Lakes Parkway, which consists of a modified Collector section. A supporting
traffic memo/update was provided with the initial submittal to substantiate the
section based on anticipated traffic volumes.
10. The internal local road right-of-way shall be sixty (60) feet in width including cul-de-sacs
with a sixty-five (65) foot radius, and dedicated to the public. The typical roadway
section of interior roadway shall be shown as two 12-foot paved lanes with 8-foot paved
parking lanes (the final traffic impact study shall also be reviewed for interior roadway
cross-sections). The cul-de-sac edge of pavement radius shall be fifty (50) feet. The
RUA criteria require curb, gutter, and sidewalk.
a. Please refer to the Change of Zone document (Sheet 20) for the required road
sections and Cul-de-sac dimensions. The Construction Plans are consistent with
these sections. Local roads lie within a 60-foot wide right-of-way and provide a
36-foot wide flowline to flowline section. The Cul-de-sac dimensions consist
50-foot radius right-of-way and a 38-foot radius flowline.
Comments — Traffic:
1 . 1 .The traffic analysis dated January 14, 2014 references a master traffic study from 2005.
This traffic study is too old to amend. Please submit a new traffic study following the
checklist on the Public Works website.
http://www.co.weld.co.us/Departments/PublicWorks/TrafficandSigning.html
a. RL Response
Comments - Access:
1 . An access permit has been approved for the access from CR 9.5 to the site (AP14-00506).
a. Noted.
2. Access from CR 28 is under the jurisdiction of the Town of Mead.
a. Noted.
Comments - General Site Requirements:
1 . Improvements/Road Maintenance Agreement: An Improvements Agreement is required
for sites with required offsite and onsite improvements. Collateral is required to ensure
the improvements are made. A draft of the agreement will be provided to the applicant
after approval of the application at the BOCC hearing. An example agreement is
available at:
http://www.co.weld.co.us/Departments/PlanningZoning/LandUseApplicationsAssistance/
ApplicationAssistance.html
a. Noted.
2. Geologic Hazard Area: This site is Not in a Geologic Hazard Area. A Geologic Hazard
Permit will not be required.
a. Noted.
3. Floodplain: The project site is within a known floodplain. A CLOMR/LOMR was
approved for this project. The project must adhere to the CLOMR/LOMR. A floodplain
permit is required for any work within the floodplain as delineated in the approved
LOMR. It appears there is work planned in the floodplain, is this lakeside path consistent
with the CLOMR/LOMR? A floodplain permit is required for work in the floodplain.
a. Noted. A floodplain development permit will be obtained for the proposed minor
grading near the lakeside path and future amenity peninsula area. The grading lies
within an area designated by the CLOMR as "non-effective" flow (i.e. outside of
the conveyance portion of the floodplain). Based on prior conversations with the
County, these minor grading adjustments may be reflected in the final LOMR
study.
Comments - Drainage Study:
1 . A drainage report is required to be completed by a Colorado Registered Professional
Engineer and adhere to the drainage related sections of the Weld County Code. The
drainage report must include a Certificate of Compliance stamped and signed by the
P.E. The Certificate of Compliance can be found on the County website
http://www.co.weld.co.us/Departments/P lanningZoning/Engineering.html
a. A Final Drainage Study was provided with the initial submittal package. A
revised study, including the Certificate of Compliance has been provided in the
revised submittal.
2. This site is not within an MS4 area.
a. Noted.
Comments — Grading Permit:
1 . A Weld County Grading Permit will be required if disturbing more than 1 acre. Contact
the Planning Department for more information.
a. Noted.
2. A Construction Stormwater Permit is also required with the State for disturbing more
than 1 acre. Contact: Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Water
Quality Control Division, Rik Gay, 303-692-3575.
a. Noted.
Comments — Plans:
1 . Plan for future signal at CR 91/2 and Bayshore drive/Barefoot Lakes parkway in the
current design to ensure structures placed at the intersection do not interfere with future
signal infrastructure.
a. RL Response
2. Provide a typical cross section detail for the multi-use trail along the north side of
Barefoot Lakes Parkway. Recommend 8' or 10' width.
a. The multi-use trail was narrowed to reduce redundancy of the on-street bike lane
along Barefoot Lakes Parkway. Refer to for section.
3. Clarify on plans existing and proposed improvements. Use industry standard light
delineation of light gray for existing and black for proposed.
a. The plans provided in the initial submittal included "Screened" linetypes for
existing improvements and solid linetypes for proposed improvements. It may be
possible that the reproduction copy darkened the screening.
4. Provide a pavement design for review. This area is known for pavement failure.
a. A preliminary pavement analysis has been completed for the proposed roads.
However, the final pavement design cannot be completed until such time the
roads have been brought to grade and properly compacted. This process typically
occurs during the overlot grading phase of the project. The final pavement designs
can be provided to the County for review at that time.
4. Provide plans and details for intersection improvements at 91/2 and Lake Catamount
Drive.
a. Please refer to the Phase 1 Paving Plan and the Phase 1 Interim Signage &
Striping Plan contained with the County Road 9 '/2 Construction plans prepared by
Carroll & Lange and previously approved by Weld County.
%.,5 . Clarify if the internal north south road (Eagle River Road) is planned to be constructed
with this filing. Plans did not include a design for this roadway.
a. Plans for Eagle River Road were provided in the initial submittal package.
6. 45mph speed limits were approved for Barefoot Lakes Parkway. The applicant's request
for 35mph was not approved. The plans show speed limit signs of 35mph. Update to
reflect the approved speed limit of 45mph.
a. Please refer to the Barefoot Lakes Supplemental Traffic Analysis prepared by
Feslburg Holt & Ullevig (FHU) dated January 14, 201 The FHU analysis
substantiates a collector level roadway requirement for Barefoot Lakes Parkway.
The 35 mph speed limit is relative to the collector road section. Prior discussions
with County staff related to 45 mph speed was assuming an Arterial roadway.
7. Show intersection corner radii on the plans. Ensure radii arc adequate for school busses
and moving trucks. See County Code for requirements.
a. In accordance with County Criteria (Section 6.4. 1 Geometric Design of the
Engineering & Construction Criteria) interior curb return radii are 25-feet. This
information is provided on the construction plans. Please refer to the note section
on each roadway plan & profile drawing. In addition, we have provided an exhibit
along with the 2"d Submittal to illustrate typical turning movements at these local
intersections.
8. Are there pedestrian connections planned between cul-de-sacs for pedestrian
connectivity?
a. Of the six true cul-de-sacs, two have direct links to sidewalks or trails. Two others
are extremely short (only one lot removed from the street) and have easy access to
sidewalks or trails. Connections were spaced to optimize the distribution of the
pedestrian network (for example, the connection out of Elk River Rd is halfway
between the connection at Fountain Creek Dr and Lake Catamount Dr.)
9. Landscape plans show path to lake and path along the lake shore however these are not
shown in design plans. Please clarify.
a. The intent is to provide a path both to and along the lake. This will be provided as
part of future improvements to the Lake Edge. Path has been removed from this
plan set.
10. Intersection of 9% and Barefoot Lakes Parkway/Bayshore Drive. Please review
pedestrian safety at this intersection. The speed is 45mph for this segment of CR91/2, the
intersection is planned at a horizontal curve, the distance to cross the intersection is long
without a pedestrian refuge, the intersection connects the employment center to the
residential development. The directional pedestrian ramps are not lined up and direct
pedestrians into the middle of the intersection.
a. Redland Response
11 . Clarify the sidewalk width for Bayshore drive free right area. The sidewalk width is
described as both 8' and 5 ' in different plan sheets.
a. Redland. Response (Confirm where this is located — DW not showing sidewalk
widths)
12. Public Works is ok with the multiuse path on the north side of the parkway and no
sidewalk or multiuse path on the south.
a. Noted.
13. Intersection sight triangles at the development entrance will be required. All landscaping
within the triangles must be less than 2% feet in height at maturity, and noted on the final
roadway plans.
a. Noted. The requested sight distance triangles are provided on the final submittal.
14. Stop signs and street name signs will be required at all intersections and shown on the
final roadway construction plans.
a. Please refer to Sheets C6.0 and C6. 1 of the Barefoot Lakes Filing No. 1
Construction Plans.
Comments - Annexation:
1 . Provide clarification and information as to if this project plans to annex to a City or
Town.
a. We are continuing to explore annexation into the Town of Firestone.
Weld County
From: Diana Aungst
Date: October 27, 2014
Document Type: Memorandum
Comment:
1 . The southern portion of the PUD is in the St. Vrain River Floodplain. It appears that the
majority of the development is outside of the floodplain. If there is any development on
this site in the floodplain a floodplain development permit (FHDP) will be required. This
floodplain is zoned AE (St. Vrain Lakes CLOMR).
o Map attached: Weld County Unincorporated Areas 080266
a. A floodplain development permit was obtained for the initial overlot grading
activity that occurred on this site in 2007. Based on the recent Barefoot Lakes
Filing No. 1 submittal, minor grading is proposed along the north embankment
of the existing lakes. This grading lies within an area designated by the CLOMR
as "non-effective" flow (i.e. outside of the conveyance portion of the floodplain).
Based on prior conversations with the County, these minor grading adjustments
may be reflected in the final LOMR study. The LOMR is anticipated to be
completed following construction of Barefoot Lakes Filing No. 1 .
Weld County
From: Frank Piacentino
Date: November 21, 2014
Document Type: Referral
Comments:
1 . A building permit will be required, for any new construction or set up manufactured
structure, per Section 29-3-10 of the Weld County Code. A building permit application
must be completed and submitted. Buildings and structures shall conform to the
requirements of the various codes adopted at the time of permit application. Currently the
following has been adopted by Weld County: 2006 International Residential Building
Code; 2012 International Energy Code; 2006 International 2011 National Electrical
Code; and Chapter 29 of the Weld County Code. A plan review shall be approved and a
permit must be issued prior to the start of construction.
a. Noted.
2. All building permit requirements can be found on the Weld County web-site:
www.co. we Id.co.us/Build inglnspectionDepartment/BuildngPermits
a. Noted.
3. A Fire District Notification Letter is required prior to issue of the building permit.
a. Noted.
Weld County
From: Frank Piacentino
Date : October 27, 2014
Document Type: Referral
Signed by Chris Mettenbrink from Colorado Parks & Wildlife
• Signed on 11/7/14
• Checked: We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests.
a. Noted.
Colorado Division of Water Resources
From: Joanna Williams, P.E.
Date : November 12, 2014
Document Type: Email
Comments
1 . No information regarding water supply and demand for this subdivision was provided to
this office; therefore our comments are based on information in the September 2, 2005
Change of Zone — Specific Development Guide prepared for St. Vrain Lakes Planned
Unit Development
a. Noted.
2. According to the Guide, domestic and irrigation water will be provided to the subdivision
via duel water system. Domestic water will be supplied by the Little Thompson Water
District from proposed and existing water mains. Sewage disposal is proposed to be
provided by the St. Vrain Sanitation District, which operates a central treatment plant.
Letters of commitment for potable water and sewer service were not submitted.
According to previous information submitted to this office the Little Thompson Water
District and St. Vrain Sanitation District are currently in the process of preparing current
service agreements, and that such agreements will be provided once available.
a. Noted.
3. Also, according to previous information it is proposed that treated effluent volumes
fromm the site would be calculated and an equivalent amount of water diverted from the
St. Vrain River into the community's southern ponds will be used to irrigate residential
and community landscaping. The Bayshore Lakes (WDID 0503307), Bayshore Diversion
(WDID 0500646), appropriative right of exchange from the St. Vrain Sanitation
District's Wastewater Treatment Plant outfall to the Bayshore Diversion, and plan for
augmentation were decreed in Division 1 Water Court case no. 2005CW0263. The lining
of the Bayshore Lakes was approved by the Division Engineer's Office in a letter dated
September 7, 2007, however the lining of the Bayshore lakes was breached during the
September 2013 flood. Therefore the Applicant will need to obtain another approved
liner for the Bayshore Lakes prior to using water from the lakes for irrigation purposes.
The proposed uses are allowed by the decree.
a. RL Response . . . in the process of repairing . . .anticipated schedule . . .
4. State Engineer's Office Opinion: It is our opinion that the proposed water supply will not
cause injury to existing water rights so long as the Little Thompson Water District
operates according to the terms and conditions of its current plan for augmentation.
However, due to a lack of information we are unable to comment on the physical
adequacy of the water supply. If you or the applicant has any questions concerning this
matter, please contact Ioana Comaniciu of this office for assistance.
a. Noted.
Weld County Public Works
From: Morgan Gabbert
Date: November 11, 2014
Document Type: Permit
Permit Number: AP 14-00506
Comments:
1 . Utilize existing access points on CR 9.5 (2-Subdivision) located approx. 1485 feet &
3015 feet South of CR 28. Requested "NEW" access point on CR 28 is located in Mead
jurisdiction. Please contact Mead for access point approval.
a. The access points along CR 9 1/2 and CR 28 are at the same locations as were
platted under the St. Vrain Lakes Filing No. 1 Subdivision plat. We are not
requesting any new access locations at this time.
Weld County
From: Mike Litzenberger
Date : November 24, 2014
Document Type: Referral
Signed by: Mike Litzenberger from Longmont Conservation District
• Date signed: 11 - 11 -2014
• Checked: - We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interest.
- Conservation letter
a. Noted
Longmont Conservation District
From: Nancy McIntyre (To : Longmont CD Board)
Date : Undated
Document Type : Site Review Memo
Brookfield Residential Properties, cast of and adjacent to CR 9.5, south of and adjacent to CR
28. Case #PUDF14-0009, Planned unit development final plat — amendment to first filing. The
re-subdivision is consistent with the proper final plan in that the land uses are remaining the
same.
1 . Prime Farmland: Some of the area is prime farmland
a. Noted.
2. Water Quality: Protect St. Vrain Creek from runoff during construction
a. Noted.
3. Noxious Weed Control: Monitor property for weeds and remove
a. Noted.
4. Soil Limitations - N/A
a. Noted.
Weld County
From: LuAnn Penfold
Date: October 27, 2014
Document Type : Referral
Signed by: LuAnn Penfold, Fire Marshal with Mountain View Fire Rescue
• Date signed: 11 - 19-2014
• See attached letter
a. Noted.
Mountain View Fire Rescue
From: LuAnn Penfold
Date : November 19, 2014
Document Type : Letter
Signed by: LuAnn Penfold, Fire Marshal with Mountain View Fire Rescue (contact phone: 303-
772-0710 x 1121)
• Fire apparatus access is satisfactory as shown on the plans
a. Noted.
• Utility plans will need to be submitted to the Fire District for review and approval prior to
installation
a. Noted.
Weld County
From: Lauren Light
Date : November 24, 2014
Document Type: Memorandum
The department recommends approval with the following notes with should appear on the final
plat as required by PF-1078 in addition to any other required notes from the previous final plat:
1 . Permanent restroom and hand washing facilities shall be provided within easy access of
all public gathering areas. At a minimum permanent, vaulted restroom facilities shall be
placed around the lake. A vault facility similar to a rest area or park service facility is
recommended.
a. There are future plans for a park on the lake edge. This public gathering area will
have restroom facilities. Additional restroom facilities around the lake arc not
included in the current plan submittal.
2. The recreational uses on the lakes may be subject to the water quality standards of the
Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Swimming Pool and Mineral
Bath Regulations.
a. Noted.
3. A stormwater discharge permit may be required for a development/redevelopment
construction site where a contiguous or non-contiguous land disturbance is greater than or
equal to one acre in area. Contact the Water Quality Control Division of the Colorado
Department of Public Health and the Environment at
www.cdphe.state.co.us/wq/PermitsUnit for more information.
a. Noted. A stormwater discharge permit will be acquired.
4. "Weld County's Right to Farm" as provided in Appendix 22-E of the Weld County Code
shall be placed on any recorded plat.
a. Noted.
b. (Check to make sure already on the plat)
5. There are Confined Animal Feeding Operations in close proximity to this development.
Residents should be aware that there are may be flies and odors associated with these
activities.
a. Noted.
b. (Check to make sure note already on the plat)
Weld County Public Works Department
From: David Bauer, Chief Senior Engineer
To : Katherine Strozinski, P.E.
Date: February 28, 2007
Document Type : Letter
Unresolved issues from prior comments on Drainage Report and Construction Plans for St. Vrain
Lakes Filing I Final Plat submittal.
a. This letter predates the recorded St. Vrain Lakes Filing No. 1 Subdivision plat and is
no longer relevant as the comments were addressed prior to the final approval and
recording of the plat.
Design Workshop, Inc. Memorandum
Landscape Architecture
To: Weld County
Planning
Urban Design From: Design Workshop
Date: February 4, 2015
Project Name: Barefoot Lakes
Project #: 5062
Subject: Response to Comments
Copy To:
Weld County
From: Jennifer Petrik
Date: November 24, 2014
Document Type : Memorandum
Comments:
1 . This site is east of I-25 north of SH119. Barefoot Lakes Filing No. 1 is a proposed re-
subdivision to a portion of the St. Vrain Lakes Filing No. 1 final plan. Barefoot Lakes
Filing No. 1 will include seven (7) construction phases in total. The first construction
phase will be based on the approved St Vrain Lakes Subdivision plans providing sixty
three (63) single family residential lots. Subsequent phases based on the Barefoot Lakes
re-plat will include two-hundred forty (240) single family residential lots with three lots
that will be reserved for future development in accordance with the PUD. The underlying
area was previously platted with a total of two-hundred fifty one (251) single family
residential lots and 16.0 acre of townhome density at 12 d.u. per acre for a total of 192
townhome units. This plan will result in a net increase in single family units of 46 lots in
exchange for a reduction of 192 townhome units.
a. Noted.
Comments — Roads:
1 . CR 9 '/2 is owned and maintained by Weld County and is shown as an Arterial roadway.
The internal roadway system of the subdivision requires
a. Noted. The initial phase of CR 9 %2 was constructed in 2007 as a requirement of
the St. Vrain Lakes Filing No. 1 Subdivision Plat.
2. CR28 is owned and maintained by the Town of Mead.
a. Noted.
3. Traffic Counts for 9 '/2 are as follows: 11 /6/13 2903 ADT, 1 /20/11 2182 ADT.
a. Noted.
4. The internal roadway is required to be maintained by the Home Owners Association and
dedicated as public right of way. For internal roadway design, 60ft right of way is
required.
i. Weld County 1-25 Parallel Arterial Study: (September 2003)
a. The internal dedicated public rights-of-way will be maintained by the
Metropolitan District, unless they are annexed to a local municipality where
they will be maintained by the municipality.
5. CR 91/2 is classified by the County as a major arterial road and requires a 140-foot right-
of-way. There is presently a 60-foot right-of-way. This road is maintained by Weld
County. Pursuant to the definition of SETBACK in the Weld County Zoning (23- 1 -90),
the required setback is measured from the future right-of-way line. The applicant shall
delineate or dedicate an additional 40-foot of right-of-way parallel to the CR 91/2 right-of-
way for future build-out.
a. Portions of right-of-way for CR 9 1/2 were previously dedicated by the St. Vrain
Lakes and St. Acacius Subdivisions. The full width of right-of-way exists
between the St. Vrain River and the south property line of St. Acacius. North of
this location and along the Brookfield/Barefoot Lakes property (east side), a
half width (70-f1) of right-of-way has been previously dedicated. Along the St.
Acacius property (west side), a 50-f1 wide portion of the ultimate half width has
been provided. Based on the full width cross-section of CR 9 %2, an additional
20-ft of right-of-way will be required from St. Acacius.
2.51 nts shall be shown in accordance with County standards (Sec. 24-7-60) and/or
Utility oard recommendations.
a. Noted
7. Intersec ion sight distance triangles at accesses/entrances will be required. All
1 and Qr n ing within the triangles must be less than 21/2 feet in height at maturity, and
Plans are not
labeled correctly. Do oted. The requested sight distance triangles are provided on the final
we have most subdivision plat.
recent plans? is and street name signs will be required at all intersections and shown as a
Please submit a )tan on final roadway plans. The current edition of the Manual on Uniform
complete set of all ;ontrol Devices (MUTCD) shall govern the signing plan.
plans electronically 5 RUA Roadway Standards: (July 2004)
in one package and e requested information can be found on Construction Plan Sheets C6.0 and
also one hard copy 6. 1 .
11 .17. rnal collector road right-of-way shall be eighty (80) feet in width and dedicated
-Signing and striping blic. Currently, the typical roadway section of interior roadway shall be shown
plans not provided . 2-foot paved lanes with 8-foot paved parking lanes (the final traffic impact study
Signs not on C6.0. ) be reviewed for interior roadway cross-sections). The RUA criteria require
:ter, and sidewalk.
please resubmit re' Please refer to the Change of ne document for the required road sections. The
with final plans. Construction Plans are sistent with these sections. One exception is Barefoot
Was the traffic Lakes Parkwa Tch consists of a modified Collector section. A supporting
memo accepted by traffic update was provided with the initial submittal to substantiate the
Public Works? was s ' n based on anticipated traffic volumes.
the speed limit
change (barefoot
lakes pkwy)
acceptable with
PW?
please resubmit.
10. The internal l0 1 road right-of-way shall be sixty (60) feet in width including cul-de-sacs
with a sixty-five 5) foot radius, and dedicated to the public. The typical roadway
section of interior ro dway shall be shown as two 12-foot paved lanes with 8-foot paved
parking lanes (the fina raffle impact study shall also be reviewed for interior roadway
cross-sections). The cut- a-sac edge of pavement radius shall be fifty (50) feet. The
RUA criteria require curb, tter, and sidewalk.
a. Please refer to the nge of Zone document (Sheet 20) for the required road
sections and Cul-de-sac dimensions. The Construction Plans are consistent with
these sections. Local roads lie within a 60-foot wide right-of-way and provide a
???? 36-foot wide flowline to flowline section. The Cul-de-sac dimensions consist
50-foot radius right-of-way and a 38-foot radius flowline.
Comments - aff c:
1 . 1 .The tr ffic analysis dated January 14, 2014 references a master traffic study from 2005.
This tra c study is too old to amend. Please submit a new traffic study following the
checklist on the Public Works website.
http://w .co.weld.co.us/Departments/PublicWorks/TrafticandSigning.html
a. R Response
Comments - Access:
1 . An access permit has been approved for the access from CR 9.5 to the site (AP14-00506).
a. Noted.
2. Access from CR 28 is under the jurisdiction of the Town of Mead.
a. Noted.
Comments - General Site Requirements:
1 . Improvements/Road Maintenance Agreement: An Improvements Agreement is required
for sites with required offsite and onsite improvements. Collateral is required to ensure
the improvements are made. A draft of the agreement will be provided to the applicant
after approval of the application at the BOCC hearing. An example agreement is
available at:
http://www.co.weld.co.us/Departments/PlanningZoning/LandUseApplicationsAssistance/
ApplicationAssistance.html
a. Noted.
2. Geologic Hazard Area: This site is Not in a Geologic Hazard Area. A Geologic Hazard
Permit will not be required.
a. Noted.
3. Floodplain: The project site is within a known floodplain. A CLOMR/LOMR was
approved for this project. The project must adhere to the CLOMR/LOMR. A floodplain
permit is required for any work within the floodplain as delineated in the approved
LOMR. It appears there is work planned in the floodplain, is this lakeside path consistent
with the CLOMR/LOMR? A floodplain permit is required for work in the floodplain.
a. Noted. A floodplain development permit will be obtained for the proposed minor
grading near the lakeside path and future amenity peninsula area. The grading lies
within an area designated by the CLOMR as "non-effective" flow (i.e. outside of
the conveyance portion of the floodplain). Based on prior conversations with the
County, these minor grading adjustments may be reflected in the final LOMR
study.
Comments - Drainage Study:
1 . A drainage report is required to be completed by a Colorado Registered Professional
Engineer and adhere to the drainage related sections of the Weld County Code. The
drainage report must include a Certificate of Compliance stamped and signed by the
P.E. The Certificate of Compliance can be found on the County website
http://www.co.weld.co.us/Departments/P lanningZoning/Engineering.html
a. A Final Drainage Study was provided with the initial submittal package. A
revised study, including the Certificate of Compliance has been provided in the
revised submittal.
2. This site is not within an MS4 area.
a. Noted.
Comments — Grading Permit:
1 . A Weld County Grading Permit will be required if disturbing more than 1 acre. Contact
the Planning Department for more information.
a. Noted.
2. A Construction Stormwater Permit is also required with the State for disturbing more
than 1 acre. Contact: Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Water
Quality Control Division, Rik Gay, 303-692-3575.
'Mtna. Noted.
Comments - Plans:
1 . Plan for future signal at CR 91/2 and Bayshore drive/Barefoot Lakes parkway in the
current design to ensure structures placed at the intersection do not interfere with future
i nal infrastructure. provide cross
a. RL Response section with
2. Provide a typical cross se ' detail for t dimension . . the north side of
Barefoot Lakes P ay. Recommend 8' or i u' wiutn.
this may be clarified . Tl u ti-use trail was narrowed to reduce redundancy of the on-street bike lane
with the electronic long Barefoot Lakes Parkway. Refer to for section.
submittal 1ar fy on plans existing and proposed improvements. Use industry standard light
requested . Jelin ation of light gray for existing and black for proposed.
a. he plans provided in the initial submittal included "Screened" linetypes for
existing improvements and solid linetypes for proposed improvements. It may be
possible that the reproduction copy darkened the screening.
4. Provide a pavement design for review. This area is known for pavement failure.
a. A preliminary pavement analysis has been completed for the proposed roads.
However, the final pavement design cannot be completed until such time the
roads have been brought to grade and properly compacted. This process typically
o urs during the overlot grading phase of the project. The final pavement designs
c n be provided to the County for review at that time.
provide prelim
analysis
please incorporate
the previous plans . e plans and details for intersection improvements at 91/2 and Lake Catamount
for the intersection
with these new e
Please refer to the Phase 1 Paving Plan and the Phase 1 Interim Signage &
plans to verify they Striping Plan contained with the County Road 9 '/2 Construction plans prepared by
match . Carroll & Lange and previously approved by Weld County.
\_5. Clarify if the internal north south road (Eagle River Road) is planned to be constructed
with this filing. Plans did not include a design for this roadway. Okay
a. Plans for Eagle River Road were provided in the initial submittal package.
6. 45mph speed limits were approved for Barefoot Lakes Parkway. The applicant's request
for 35mph was not approved. The plans show speed limit signs of 35mph. Update to
reflect the approved speed limit of 45mph.
a. Please refer to the Barefoot Lakes Supplemental Traffic Analysis prepared by
Feslburg Holt & Ullevig (FHU) dated faeuary 14, 201 The FHU analysis Sent to PW for
substantiates a collector level roadway requirement for Barefoot Lakes Par review
The 35 mph speed limit is relative to the collector road section. Prior discu stuns
with County staff related to 45 mph speed was assuming an Arterial roadway.
7. Show intersection corner radii on the plans. Ensure radii arc adequate for school busses
and moving trucks. See County Code for requirements.
a. In accordance with County Criteria (Section 6.4. 1 Geometric Design of the
Engineering & Construction Criteria) interior curb return radii are 25-feet. This
information is provided on the construction plans. Please refer to the note section
n each roadway plan & profile drawing. In addition, we have provided an exhibit
Please resubmit long with the 2"d Submittal to illustrate typical turning movements at these local
intersections.
8. Are there pedestrian connections planned between cul-de-sacs for pedestrian
connectivity?
a. Of the six true cul-de-sacs, two have direct links to sidewalks or trails. Two others
are extremely short (only one lot removed from the street) and have easy access to
sidewalks or trails. Connections were spaced to optimize the distribution of the
pedestrian network (for example, the connection out of Elk River Rd is halfway
between the connection at Fountain Creek Dr and Lake Catamount Dr.)
9. Landscape plans show path to lake and path along the lake shore however these are not
shown in design plans. Please clarify.
a. The intent is to provide a path both to and along the lake. This will be provided as
part of future improvements to the Lake Edge. Path has been removed from this
plan set.
10. Intersection of 9% and Barefoot Lakes Parkway/Bayshore Drive. Please review
pedestrian safety at this intersection. The speed is 45mph for this segment of CR91/2, the
intersection is planned at a horizontal curve, the distance to cross the intersection is long
without a pedestrian refuge, the intersection connects the employment center to the
residential development. The directional pedestrian ramps are not lined up and direct
pedestrians into the middle of the intersection.
a. Redland Response
11 . Clarify the sidewalk width for Bayshore drive free right area. The sidewalk width is
described as both 8' and 5 ' in different plan sheets.
a. Redland. Response (Confirm where this is located — DW not showing sidewalk
widths)
12. Public Works is ok with the multiuse path on the north side of the parkway and no
sidewalk or multiuse path on the south.
a. Noted.
13. Intersection sight triangles at the development entrance will be required. All landscaping
within the triangles must be less than 2% feet in height at maturity, and noted on the final
roadway plans. ISame as No. 7 l
a. Noted. The requested sight distaned a 1u1181�, �.i n u v iuJ on the fina
l g � � submittal.
14. Stop signs and street name signs will be required at all intersections and shown on the
final roadway construction plans.
a. Please refer to Sheets C6.0 and C6. 1 of the Barefoot Lakes Filing No. 1
Construction Plans. Not found
Comments - Annexation:
1 . Provide clarification and information as to if this project plans to annex to a City or
Town.
a. We are continuing to explore annexation into the Town of Firestone.
Weld County
From: Diana Aungst
Date: October 27, 2014
Document Type: Memorandum
Comment:
1 . The southern portion of the PUD is in the St. Vrain River Floodplain. It appears that the
majority of the development is outside of the floodplain. If there is any development on
this site in the floodplain a floodplain development permit (FHDP) will be required. This
floodplain is zoned AE (St. Vrain Lakes CLOMR).
o Map attached: Weld County Unincorporated Areas 080266
a. A floodplain development permit was obtained for the initial overlot grading
activity that occurred on this site in 2007. Based on the recent Barefoot Lakes
Filing No. 1 submittal, minor grading is proposed along the north embankment
of the existing lakes. This grading lies within an area designated by the CLOMR
as "non-effective" flow (i.e. outside of the conveyance portion of the floodplain).
Based on prior conversations with the County, these minor grading adjustments
may be reflected in the final LOMR study. The LOMR is anticipated to be
completed following construction of Barefoot Lakes Filing No. 1 .
Weld County
From: Frank Piacentino
Date: November 21, 2014
Document Type: Referral
Comments:
1 . A building permit will be required, for any new construction or set up manufactured
structure, per Section 29-3-10 of the Weld County Code. A building permit application
must be completed and submitted. Buildings and structures shall conform to the
requirements of the various codes adopted at the time of permit application. Currently the
following has been adopted by Weld County: 2006 International Residential Building
Code; 2012 International Energy Code; 2006 International 2011 National Electrical
Code; and Chapter 29 of the Weld County Code. A plan review shall be approved and a
permit must be issued prior to the start of construction.
a. Noted.
2. All building permit requirements can be found on the Weld County web-site:
www.co. we Id.co.us/Build inglnspectionDepartment/BuildngPermits
a. Noted.
3. A Fire District Notification Letter is required prior to issue of the building permit.
a. Noted.
Weld County
From: Frank Piacentino
Date : October 27, 2014
Document Type: Referral
Signed by Chris Mettenbrink from Colorado Parks & Wildlife
• Signed on 11/7/14
• Checked: We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests.
a. Noted.
Colorado Division of Water Resources
From: Joanna Williams, P.E.
Date : November 12, 2014
Document Type: Email
Comments
1 . No information regarding water supply and demand for this subdivision was provided to
this office; therefore our comments are based on information in the September 2, 2005
Change of Zone — Specific Development Guide prepared for St. Vrain Lakes Planned
Unit Development
a. Noted.
2. According to the Guide, domestic and irrigation water will be provided to the subdivision
via duel water system. Domestic water will be supplied by the Little Thompson Water
District from proposed and existing water mains. Sewage disposal is proposed to be
provided by the St. Vrain Sanitation District, which operates a central treatment plant.
Letters of commitment for potable water and sewer service were not submitted.
According to previous information submitted to this office the Little Thompson Water
District and St. Vrain Sanitation District are currently in the process of preparing current
service agreements, and that such agreements will be provided once available.
a. Noted.
3. Also, according to previous information it is proposed that treated effluent volumes
fromm the site would be calculated and an equivalent amount of water diverted from the
St. Vrain River into the community's southern ponds will be used to irrigate residential
and community landscaping. The Bayshore Lakes (WDID 0503307), Bayshore Diversion
(WDID 0500646), appropriative right of exchange from the St. Vrain Sanitation
District's Wastewater Treatment Plant outfall to the Bayshore Diversion, and plan for
augmentation were decreed in Division 1 Water Court case no. 2005CW0263. The lining
of the Bayshore Lakes was approved by the Division Engineer's Office in a letter dated
September 7, 2007, however the lining of the Bayshore lakes was breached during the
September 2013 flood. Therefore the Applicant will need to obtain another approved
liner for the Bayshore Lakes prior to using water from the lakes for irrigation purposes.
The proposed uses are allowed by the decree.
a. RL Response . . . in the process of repairing . . .anticipated schedule . . .
4. State Engineer's Office Opinion: It is our opinion that the proposed water supply will not
cause injury to existing water rights so long as the Little Thompson Water District
operates according to the terms and conditions of its current plan for augmentation.
However, due to a lack of information we are unable to comment on the physical
adequacy of the water supply. If you or the applicant has any questions concerning this
matter, please contact Ioana Comaniciu of this office for assistance.
a. Noted.
Weld County Public Works
From: Morgan Gabbert
Date: November 11, 2014
Document Type: Permit
Permit Number: AP 14-00506
Comments:
1 . Utilize existing access points on CR 9.5 (2-Subdivision) located approx. 1485 feet &
3015 feet South of CR 28. Requested "NEW" access point on CR 28 is located in Mead
jurisdiction. Please contact Mead for access point approval.
a. The access points along CR 9 1/2 and CR 28 are at the same locations as were
platted under the St. Vrain Lakes Filing No. 1 Subdivision plat. We are not
requesting any new access locations at this time.
Weld County
From: Mike Litzenberger
Date : November 24, 2014
Document Type: Referral
Signed by: Mike Litzenberger from Longmont Conservation District
• Date signed: 11 - 11 -2014
• Checked: - We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interest.
- Conservation letter
a. Noted
Longmont Conservation District
From: Nancy McIntyre (To : Longmont CD Board)
Date : Undated
Document Type : Site Review Memo
Brookfield Residential Properties, cast of and adjacent to CR 9.5, south of and adjacent to CR
28. Case #PUDF14-0009, Planned unit development final plat — amendment to first filing. The
re-subdivision is consistent with the proper final plan in that the land uses are remaining the
same.
1 . Prime Farmland: Some of the area is prime farmland
a. Noted.
2. Water Quality: Protect St. Vrain Creek from runoff during construction
a. Noted.
3. Noxious Weed Control: Monitor property for weeds and remove
a. Noted.
4. Soil Limitations - N/A
a. Noted.
Weld County
From: LuAnn Penfold
Date: October 27, 2014
Document Type : Referral
Signed by: LuAnn Penfold, Fire Marshal with Mountain View Fire Rescue
• Date signed: 11 - 19-2014
• See attached letter
a. Noted.
Mountain View Fire Rescue
From: LuAnn Penfold
Date : November 19, 2014
Document Type : Letter
Signed by: LuAnn Penfold, Fire Marshal with Mountain View Fire Rescue (contact phone: 303-
772-0710 x 1121)
• Fire apparatus access is satisfactory as shown on the plans
a. Noted.
• Utility plans will need to be submitted to the Fire District for review and approval prior to
installation
a. Noted.
Weld County
From: Lauren Light
Date : November 24, 2014
Document Type: Memorandum
The department recommends approval with the following notes with should appear on the final
plat as required by PF-1078 in addition to any other required notes from the previous final plat:
1 . Permanent restroom and hand washing facilities shall be provided within easy access of
all public gathering areas. At a minimum permanent, vaulted restroom facilities shall be
placed around the lake. A vault facility similar to a rest area or park service facility is
recommended.
a. There are future plans for a park on the lake edge. This public gathering area will
have restroom facilities. Additional restroom facilities around the lake arc not
included in the current plan submittal.
2. The recreational uses on the lakes may be subject to the water quality standards of the
Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Swimming Pool and Mineral
Bath Regulations.
a. Noted.
3. A stormwater discharge permit may be required for a development/redevelopment
construction site where a contiguous or non-contiguous land disturbance is greater than or
equal to one acre in area. Contact the Water Quality Control Division of the Colorado
Department of Public Health and the Environment at
www.cdphe.state.co.us/wq/PermitsUnit for more information.
a. Noted. A stormwater discharge permit will be acquired.
4. "Weld County's Right to Farm" as provided in Appendix 22-E of the Weld County Code
shall be placed on any recorded plat.
a. Noted.
b. (Check to make sure already on the plat)
5. There are Confined Animal Feeding Operations in close proximity to this development.
Residents should be aware that there are may be flies and odors associated with these
activities.
a. Noted.
b. (Check to make sure note already on the plat)
Weld County Public Works Department
From: David Bauer, Chief Senior Engineer
To : Katherine Strozinski, P.E.
Date: February 28, 2007
Document Type : Letter
Unresolved issues from prior comments on Drainage Report and Construction Plans for St. Vrain
Lakes Filing I Final Plat submittal.
a. This letter predates the recorded St. Vrain Lakes Filing No. 1 Subdivision plat and is
no longer relevant as the comments were addressed prior to the final approval and
recording of the plat.
Design Workshop, Inc. Memorandum
Landscape Architecture
To: Weld County
Planning
Urban Design From: Design Workshop
Date: February 4, 2015
Project Name: Barefoot Lakes
Project #: 5062
Subject: Response to Comments
Copy To:
Weld County
From: Jennifer Petrik
Date: November 24, 2014
Document Type : Memorandum
Comments:
1 . This site is east of I-25 north of SH119. Barefoot Lakes Filing No. 1 is a proposed re-
subdivision to a portion of the St. Vrain Lakes Filing No. 1 final plan. Barefoot Lakes
Filing No. 1 will include seven (7) construction phases in total. The first construction
phase will be based on the approved St Vrain Lakes Subdivision plans providing sixty
three (63) single family residential lots. Subsequent phases based on the Barefoot Lakes
re-plat will include two-hundred forty (240) single family residential lots with three lots
that will be reserved for future development in accordance with the PUD. The underlying
area was previously platted with a total of two-hundred fifty one (251) single family
residential lots and 16.0 acre of townhome density at 12 d.u. per acre for a total of 192
townhome units. This plan will result in a net increase in single family units of 46 lots in
exchange for a reduction of 192 townhome units.
a. Noted.
Comments — Roads:
1 . CR 9 '/2 is owned and maintained by Weld County and is shown as an Arterial roadway.
The internal roadway system of the subdivision requires
a. Noted. The initial phase of CR 9 %2 was constructed in 2007 as a requirement of
the St. Vrain Lakes Filing No. 1 Subdivision Plat.
2. CR28 is owned and maintained by the Town of Mead.
a. Noted.
3. Traffic Counts for 9 '/2 are as follows: 11 /6/13 2903 ADT, 1 /20/11 2182 ADT.
a. Noted.
4. The internal roadway is required to be maintained by the Home Owners Association and
dedicated as public right of way. For internal roadway design, 60ft right of way is
required.
i. Weld County 1-25 Parallel Arterial Study: (September 2003)
a. The internal dedicated public rights-of-way will be maintained by the
Metropolitan District, unless they are annexed to a local municipality where
they will be maintained by the municipality.
5. CR 91/2 is classified by the County as a major arterial road and requires a 140-foot right-
of-way. There is presently a 60-foot right-of-way. This road is maintained by Weld
County. Pursuant to the definition of SETBACK in the Weld County Zoning (23- 1 -90),
the required setback is measured from the future right-of-way line. The applicant shall
delineate or dedicate an additional 40-foot of right-of-way parallel to the CR 91/2 right-of-
way for future build-out.
a. Portions of right-of-way for CR 9 1/2 were previously dedicated by the St. Vrain
Lakes and St. Acacius Subdivisions. The full width of right-of-way exists
between the St. Vrain River and the south property line of St. Acacius. North of
this location and along the Brookfield/Barefoot Lakes property (east side), a
half width (70-f1) of right-of-way has been previously dedicated. Along the St.
Acacius property (west side), a 50-fl wide portion of the ultimate half width has
been provided. Based on the full width cross-section of CR 9 %2, an additional
20-ft of right-of-way will be required from St. Acacius.
6. Easements shall be shown in accordance with County standards (Sec. 24-7-60) and/or
Utility Board recommendations.
a. Noted
7. Intersection sight distance triangles at accesses/entrances will be required. All
landscaping within the triangles must be less than 21/2 feet in height at maturity, and
noted.
a. Noted. The requested sight distance triangles are provided on the final
subdivision plat.
8. Stop signs and street name signs will be required at all intersections and shown as a
signing plan on final roadway plans. The current edition of the Manual on Uniform
Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) shall govern the signing plan.
1-25 RUA Roadway Standards: (July 2004)
a. The requested information can be found on Construction Plan Sheets C6.0 and
C6. 1 .
9. Any internal collector road right-of-way shall be eighty (80) feet in width and dedicated
to the public. Currently, the typical roadway section of interior roadway shall be shown
as two 12-foot paved lanes with 8-foot paved parking lanes (the final traffic impact study
shall also be reviewed for interior roadway cross-sections). The RUA criteria require
curb, gutter, and sidewalk.
a. Please refer to the Change of Zone document for the required road sections. The
Construction Plans are consistent with these sections. One exception is Barefoot
Lakes Parkway, which consists of a modified Collector section. A supporting
traffic memo/update was provided with the initial submittal to substantiate the
section based on anticipated traffic volumes.
10. The internal local road right-of-way shall be sixty (60) feet in width including cul-de-sacs
with a sixty-five (65) foot radius, and dedicated to the public. The typical roadway
section of interior roadway shall be shown as two 12-foot paved lanes with 8-foot paved
parking lanes (the final traffic impact study shall also be reviewed for interior roadway
cross-sections). The cul-de-sac edge of pavement radius shall be fifty (50) feet. The
RUA criteria require curb, gutter, and sidewalk.
a. Please refer to the Change of Zone document (Sheet 20) for the required road
sections and Cul-de-sac dimensions. The Construction Plans are consistent with
these sections. Local roads lie within a 60-foot wide right-of-way and provide a
36-foot wide flowline to flowline section. The Cul-de-sac dimensions consist
50-foot radius right-of-way and a 38-foot radius flowline.
Comments — Traffic:
1 . 1 .The traffic analysis dated January 14, 2014 references a master traffic study from 2005.
This traffic study is too old to amend. Please submit a new traffic study following the
checklist on the Public Works website.
http://www.co.weld.co.us/Departments/PublicWorks/TrafficandSigning.html
a. RL Response
Comments - Access:
1 . An access permit has been approved for the access from CR 9.5 to the site (AP14-00506).
a. Noted.
2. Access from CR 28 is under the jurisdiction of the Town of Mead.
a. Noted.
Comments - General Site Requirements:
1 . Improvements/Road Maintenance Agreement: An Improvements Agreement is required
for sites with required offsite and onsite improvements. Collateral is required to ensure
the improvements are made. A draft of the agreement will be provided to the applicant
after approval of the application at the BOCC hearing. An example agreement is
available at:
http://www.co.weld.co.us/Departments/PlanningZoning/LandUseApplicationsAssistance/
ApplicationAssistance.html
a. Noted.
2. Geologic Hazard Area: This site is Not in a Geologic Hazard Area. A Geologic Hazard
Permit will not be required.
a. Noted.
3. Floodplain: The project site is within a known floodplain. A CLOMR/LOMR was
approved for this project. The project must adhere to the CLOMR/LOMR. A floodplain
permit is required for any work within the floodplain as delineated in the approved
LOMR. It appears there is work planned in the floodplain, is this lakeside path consistent
with the CLOMR/LOMR? A floodplain permit is required for work in the floodplain.
a. Noted. A floodplain development permit will be obtained for the proposed minor
grading near the lakeside path and future amenity peninsula area. The grading lies
within an area designated by the CLOMR as "non-effective" flow (i.e. outside of
the conveyance portion of the floodplain). Based on prior conversations with the
County, these minor grading adjustments may be reflected in the final LOMR
study.
Comments - Drainage Study:
1 . A drainage report is required to be completed by a Colorado Registered Professional
Engineer and adhere to the drainage related sections of the Weld County Code. The
drainage report must include a Certificate of Compliance stamped and signed by the
P.E. The Certificate of Compliance can be found on the County website
http://www.co.weld.co.us/Departments/P lanningZoning/Engineering.html
a. A Final Drainage Study was provided with the initial submittal package. A
revised study, including the Certificate of Compliance has been provided in the
revised submittal.
2. This site is not within an MS4 area.
a. Noted.
Comments — Grading Permit:
1 . A Weld County Grading Permit will be required if disturbing more than 1 acre. Contact
the Planning Department for more information.
a. Noted.
2. A Construction Stormwater Permit is also required with the State for disturbing more
than 1 acre. Contact: Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Water
Quality Control Division, Rik Gay, 303-692-3575.
a. Noted.
Comments — Plans:
1 . Plan for future signal at CR 91/2 and Bayshore drive/Barefoot Lakes parkway in the
current design to ensure structures placed at the intersection do not interfere with future
signal infrastructure.
a. RL Response
2. Provide a typical cross section detail for the multi-use trail along the north side of
Barefoot Lakes Parkway. Recommend 8' or 10' width.
a. The multi-use trail was narrowed to reduce redundancy of the on-street bike lane
along Barefoot Lakes Parkway. Refer to for section.
3. Clarify on plans existing and proposed improvements. Use industry standard light
delineation of light gray for existing and black for proposed.
a. The plans provided in the initial submittal included "Screened" linetypes for
existing improvements and solid linetypes for proposed improvements. It may be
possible that the reproduction copy darkened the screening.
4. Provide a pavement design for review. This area is known for pavement failure.
a. A preliminary pavement analysis has been completed for the proposed roads.
However, the final pavement design cannot be completed until such time the
roads have been brought to grade and properly compacted. This process typically
occurs during the overlot grading phase of the project. The final pavement designs
can be provided to the County for review at that time.
4. Provide plans and details for intersection improvements at 91/2 and Lake Catamount
Drive.
a. Please refer to the Phase 1 Paving Plan and the Phase 1 Interim Signage &
Striping Plan contained with the County Road 9 '/2 Construction plans prepared by
Carroll & Lange and previously approved by Weld County.
%.,5 . Clarify if the internal north south road (Eagle River Road) is planned to be constructed
with this filing. Plans did not include a design for this roadway.
a. Plans for Eagle River Road were provided in the initial submittal package.
6. 45mph speed limits were approved for Barefoot Lakes Parkway. The applicant's request
for 35mph was not approved. The plans show speed limit signs of 35mph. Update to
reflect the approved speed limit of 45mph.
a. Please refer to the Barefoot Lakes Supplemental Traffic Analysis prepared by
Feslburg Holt & Ullevig (FHU) dated January 14, 201 The FHU analysis
substantiates a collector level roadway requirement for Barefoot Lakes Parkway.
The 35 mph speed limit is relative to the collector road section. Prior discussions
with County staff related to 45 mph speed was assuming an Arterial roadway.
7. Show intersection corner radii on the plans. Ensure radii arc adequate for school busses
and moving trucks. See County Code for requirements.
a. In accordance with County Criteria (Section 6.4. 1 Geometric Design of the
Engineering & Construction Criteria) interior curb return radii are 25-feet. This
information is provided on the construction plans. Please refer to the note section
on each roadway plan & profile drawing. In addition, we have provided an exhibit
along with the 2"d Submittal to illustrate typical turning movements at these local
intersections.
8. Are there pedestrian connections planned between cul-de-sacs for pedestrian
connectivity?
a. Of the six true cul-de-sacs, two have direct links to sidewalks or trails. Two others
are extremely short (only one lot removed from the street) and have easy access to
sidewalks or trails. Connections were spaced to optimize the distribution of the
pedestrian network (for example, the connection out of Elk River Rd is halfway
between the connection at Fountain Creek Dr and Lake Catamount Dr.)
9. Landscape plans show path to lake and path along the lake shore however these are not
shown in design plans. Please clarify.
a. The intent is to provide a path both to and along the lake. This will be provided as
part of future improvements to the Lake Edge. Path has been removed from this
plan set.
10. Intersection of 9% and Barefoot Lakes Parkway/Bayshore Drive. Please review
pedestrian safety at this intersection. The speed is 45mph for this segment of CR91/2, the
intersection is planned at a horizontal curve, the distance to cross the intersection is long
without a pedestrian refuge, the intersection connects the employment center to the
residential development. The directional pedestrian ramps are not lined up and direct
pedestrians into the middle of the intersection.
a. Redland Response
11 . Clarify the sidewalk width for Bayshore drive free right area. The sidewalk width is
described as both 8' and 5 ' in different plan sheets.
a. Redland. Response (Confirm where this is located — DW not showing sidewalk
widths)
12. Public Works is ok with the multiuse path on the north side of the parkway and no
sidewalk or multiuse path on the south.
a. Noted.
13. Intersection sight triangles at the development entrance will be required. All landscaping
within the triangles must be less than 2% feet in height at maturity, and noted on the final
roadway plans.
a. Noted. The requested sight distance triangles are provided on the final submittal.
14. Stop signs and street name signs will be required at all intersections and shown on the
final roadway construction plans.
a. Please refer to Sheets C6.0 and C6. 1 of the Barefoot Lakes Filing No. 1
Construction Plans.
Comments - Annexation:
1 . Provide clarification and information as to if this project plans to annex to a City or
Town.
a. We are continuing to explore annexation into the Town of Firestone.
Weld County
From: Diana Aungst
Date: October 27, 2014
Document Type: Memorandum
Comment:
1 . The southern portion of the PUD is in the St. Vrain River Floodplain. It appears that the
majority of the development is outside of the floodplain. If there is any development on
this site in the floodplain a floodplain development permit (FHDP) will be required. This
floodplain is zoned AE (St. Vrain Lakes CLOMR).
o Map attached: Weld County Unincorporated Areas 080266
a. A floodplain development permit was obtained for the initial overlot grading
activity that occurred on this site in 2007. Based on the recent Barefoot Lakes
Filing No. 1 submittal, minor grading is proposed along the north embankment
of the existing lakes. This grading lies within an area designated by the CLOMR
as "non-effective" flow (i.e. outside of the conveyance portion of the floodplain).
Based on prior conversations with the County, these minor grading adjustments
may be reflected in the final LOMR study. The LOMR is anticipated to be
completed following construction of Barefoot Lakes Filing No. 1 .
Weld County
From: Frank Piacentino
Date: November 21, 2014
Document Type: Referral
Comments:
1 . A building permit will be required, for any new construction or set up manufactured
structure, per Section 29-3-10 of the Weld County Code. A building permit application
must be completed and submitted. Buildings and structures shall conform to the
requirements of the various codes adopted at the time of permit application. Currently the
following has been adopted by Weld County: 2006 International Residential Building
Code; 2012 International Energy Code; 2006 International 2011 National Electrical
Code; and Chapter 29 of the Weld County Code. A plan review shall be approved and a
permit must be issued prior to the start of construction.
a. Noted.
2. All building permit requirements can be found on the Weld County web-site:
www.co. we Id.co.us/Build inglnspectionDepartment/BuildngPermits
a. Noted.
3. A Fire District Notification Letter is required prior to issue of the building permit.
a. Noted.
Weld County
From: Frank Piacentino
Date : October 27, 2014
Document Type: Referral
Signed by Chris Mettenbrink from Colorado Parks & Wildlife
• Signed on 11/7/14
• Checked: We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests.
a. Noted.
Colorado Division of Water Resources
From: Joanna Williams, P.E.
Date : November 12, 2014
Document Type: Email
Comments
1 . No information regarding water supply and demand for this subdivision was provided to
this office; therefore our comments are based on information in the September 2, 2005
Change of Zone — Specific Development Guide prepared for St. Vrain Lakes Planned
Unit Development
a. Noted.
2. According to the Guide, domestic and irrigation water will be provided to the subdivision
via duel water system. Domestic water will be supplied by the Little Thompson Water
District from proposed and existing water mains. Sewage disposal is proposed to be
provided by the St. Vrain Sanitation District, which operates a central treatment plant.
Letters of commitment for potable water and sewer service were not submitted.
According to previous information submitted to this office the Little Thompson Water
District and St. Vrain Sanitation District are currently in the process of preparing current
service agreements, and that such agreements will be provided once available.
a. Noted.
3. Also, according to previous information it is proposed that treated effluent volumes
fromm the site would be calculated and an equivalent amount of water diverted from the
St. Vrain River into the community's southern ponds will be used to irrigate residential
and community landscaping. The Bayshore Lakes (WDID 0503307), Bayshore Diversion
(WDID 0500646), appropriative right of exchange from the St. Vrain Sanitation
District's Wastewater Treatment Plant outfall to the Bayshore Diversion, and plan for
augmentation were decreed in Division 1 Water Court case no. 2005CW0263. The lining
of the Bayshore Lakes was approved by the Division Engineer's Office in a letter dated
September 7, 2007, however the lining of the Bayshore lakes was breached during the
September 2013 flood. Therefore the Applicant will need to obtain another approved
liner for the Bayshore Lakes prior to using water from the lakes for irrigation purposes.
The proposed uses are allowed by the decree.
a. RL Response . . . in the process of repairing . . .anticipated schedule . . .
4. State Engineer's Office Opinion: It is our opinion that the proposed water supply will not
cause injury to existing water rights so long as the Little Thompson Water District
operates according to the terms and conditions of its current plan for augmentation.
However, due to a lack of information we are unable to comment on the physical
adequacy of the water supply. If you or the applicant has any questions concerning this
matter, please contact Ioana Comaniciu of this office for assistance.
a. Noted.
Weld County Public Works
From: Morgan Gabbert
Date: November 11, 2014
Document Type: Permit
Permit Number: AP 14-00506
Comments:
1 . Utilize existing access points on CR 9.5 (2-Subdivision) located approx. 1485 feet &
3015 feet South of CR 28. Requested "NEW" access point on CR 28 is located in Mead
jurisdiction. Please contact Mead for access point approval.
a. The access points along CR 9 1/2 and CR 28 are at the same locations as were
platted under the St. Vrain Lakes Filing No. 1 Subdivision plat. We are not
requesting any new access locations at this time.
Weld County
From: Mike Litzenberger
Date : November 24, 2014
Document Type: Referral
Signed by: Mike Litzenberger from Longmont Conservation District
• Date signed: 11 - 11 -2014
• Checked: - We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interest.
- Conservation letter
a. Noted
Longmont Conservation District
From: Nancy McIntyre (To : Longmont CD Board)
Date : Undated
Document Type : Site Review Memo
Brookfield Residential Properties, cast of and adjacent to CR 9.5, south of and adjacent to CR
28. Case #PUDF14-0009, Planned unit development final plat — amendment to first filing. The
re-subdivision is consistent with the proper final plan in that the land uses are remaining the
same.
1 . Prime Farmland: Some of the area is prime farmland
a. Noted.
2. Water Quality: Protect St. Vrain Creek from runoff during construction
a. Noted.
3. Noxious Weed Control: Monitor property for weeds and remove
a. Noted.
4. Soil Limitations - N/A
a. Noted.
Weld County
From: LuAnn Penfold
Date: October 27, 2014
Document Type : Referral
Signed by: LuAnn Penfold, Fire Marshal with Mountain View Fire Rescue
• Date signed: 11 - 19-2014
• See attached letter
a. Noted.
Mountain View Fire Rescue
From: LuAnn Penfold
Date : November 19, 2014
Document Type : Letter
Signed by: LuAnn Penfold, Fire Marshal with Mountain View Fire Rescue (contact phone: 303-
772-0710 x 1121)
• Fire apparatus access is satisfactory as shown on the plans
a. Noted.
• Utility plans will need to be submitted to the Fire District for review and approval prior to
installation
a. Noted.
Weld County
From: Lauren Light
Date : November 24, 2014
Document Type: Memorandum
The department recommends approval with the following notes with should appear on the final
plat as required by PF-1078 in addition to any other required notes from the previous final plat:
1 . Permanent restroom and hand washing facilities shall be provided within easy access of
all public gathering areas. At a minimum permanent, vaulted restroom facilities shall be
placed around the lake. A vault facility similar to a rest area or park service facility is
recommended.
a. There are future plans for a park on the lake edge. This public gathering area will
have restroom facilities. Additional restroom facilities around the lake arc not
included in the current plan submittal.
2. The recreational uses on the lakes may be subject to the water quality standards of the
Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Swimming Pool and Mineral
Bath Regulations.
a. Noted.
3. A stormwater discharge permit may be required for a development/redevelopment
construction site where a contiguous or non-contiguous land disturbance is greater than or
equal to one acre in area. Contact the Water Quality Control Division of the Colorado
Department of Public Health and the Environment at
www.cdphe.state.co.us/wq/PermitsUnit for more information.
a. Noted. A stormwater discharge permit will be acquired.
4. "Weld County's Right to Farm" as provided in Appendix 22-E of the Weld County Code
shall be placed on any recorded plat.
a. Noted.
b. (Check to make sure already on the plat)
5. There are Confined Animal Feeding Operations in close proximity to this development.
Residents should be aware that there are may be flies and odors associated with these
activities.
a. Noted.
b. (Check to make sure note already on the plat)
Weld County Public Works Department
From: David Bauer, Chief Senior Engineer
To : Katherine Strozinski, P.E.
Date: February 28, 2007
Document Type : Letter
Unresolved issues from prior comments on Drainage Report and Construction Plans for St. Vrain
Lakes Filing I Final Plat submittal.
a. This letter predates the recorded St. Vrain Lakes Filing No. 1 Subdivision plat and is
no longer relevant as the comments were addressed prior to the final approval and
recording of the plat.
MINUTES OF THE WELD COUNTY UTILITIES ADVISORY COMMITTEE
A regular meeting of the Weld County Utilities Coordinating Advisory Committee was held on Thursday, March
26, 2015 at 10:00 a.m., in the Hearing Room of the Weld County Planning Department at 1555 N 171'Ave,
Greeley, Colorado.
Members Present: Galen Monson, LeAnn Koons, and Wayne Howard
Members Absent: Richard Hastings, Jerry Adams, Terry Stencel, Tom Beach, Robert Fleck and Al
Trujillo.
Also Present: Kim Ogle, Department of Planning Services and Kris Ranslem, Secretary.
CASE NUMBER: PUDF14-0009
APPLICANT: BROOKFIELD RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES
PLANNER: KIM OGLE
REQUEST: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FINAL PLAT-AMENDMENT TO FIRST FILING,
PF-1078- REPLAT OF LOTS 1-32, BLOCK 7; LOTS 1-11, BLOCK 8; LOTS 1-14
BLOCK 9; LOTS 10-17, BLOCK 10; LOTS 1-7, BLOCK 14 AND TRACT H AND
THE VACATION OF LAKE CATAMOUNT PARKWAY BETWEEN COUNTY ROAD
9.5 AND EAGLE RIVER ROAD; THE VACATION OF PLATTE RIVER DRIVE
BETWEEN ELK RIVER ROAD AND LAKE CATAMOUNT DRIVE; GRAND LAKE
DRIVE BETWEEN ELK RIVER ROAD AND LAKE CATAMOUNT DRIVE; MAGGIE
COURT BETWEEN EMERALD LAKE DRIVE AND EMERALD LAKE DRIVE;
SAMANTHA PLACE BETWEEN WILLOW CREEK RUN AND WILLOW CREEK
RUN;WILLOW CREEK RUN BETWEEN EMERALD LAKE DRIVE AND WILLOW
CREEK RUN; EMERALD LAKE DRIVE BETWEEN YAMPA RIVER ROAD AND
WILLOW CREEK RUN; WANEKA LAKE COURT BETWEEN PIEDRA RIVER
ROAD AND PIEDRA RIVER ROAD; CLEAR CREEK DRIVE BETWEEN LAKE
CATAMOUNT PARKWAY AND PIEDRA RIVER ROAD; PIEDRA RIVER ROAD
BETWEEN CLEAR CREEK DRIVE AND EAGLE RIVER ROAD; ESCALANTE
CREEK COURT BETWEEN MERIDIAN LAKE DRIVE AND MERIDIAN LAKE
DRIVE; MERIDIAN LAKE DRIVE BETWEEN ESCALANTE CREEK COURT AND
YAMPA RIVER ROAD; SQUIRREL CREEK COURT BETWEEN YAMPA RIVER
ROAD AND YAMPA RIVER ROAD; YAMPA RIVER ROAD BETWEEN EAGLE
RIVER ROAD AND EAGLE RIVER ROAD; FISH CREEK WAY BETWEEN
CANADIAN RIVER ROAD AND YAMPA RIVER ROAD;CANADIAN RIVER ROAD
BETWEEN EAGLE RIVER ROAD AND YAMPA RIVER ROAD; CASTLE CREEK
WAY BETWEEN EAGLE RIVER RIAD AND YAMPA RIVER ROAD;TRINCHERA
CREEK ROAD BETWEEN BAYSHORE DRIVE AND BAYSHORE DRIVE;
MIRAMONTE LAKE CIRCLE BETWEEN BAYSHORE DRIVE AND BAYSHORE
DIRVE; BAYSHORE DRIVE BETWEEN EAGLE RIVER ROAD AND YAMPA RIVER
ROAD; BAYSHORE DRIVE BETWEEN COUNTY ROAD 9.5 AND EAGLE RIVER
ROAD; CIMMARON RIVER ROAD BETWEEN FOUNTAIN CREEK DRIVE AND
COLORADO RIVER ROAD; FOUNTAIN CREEK DRIVE BETWEEN COLORADO
RIVER ROAD AND CIMMARON RIVER ROAD; COLORADO RIVER ROAD
BETWEEN FOUNTAIN CREEK DRIVE AND CIMMARON RIVER ROAD; ELK
RIVER ROAD BETWEEN ST. VRAIN RIVER ROAD AND CIMMARON RIVER
ROAD;ST VRAIN RIVER ROAD BETWEEN ELK RIVER ROAD AND CIMMARON
RIVER ROAD; AND LAKE CATAMOUNT PARKWAY BETWEEN EAGLE RIVER
ROAD AND YAMPA RIVER ROAD.LEGAL DESCRIPTION: TRACT A
ARROWHEAD 4TH FILING; LOCATED IN PART OF THE N2 OF SECTION 27,
T5N, R66W OF THE 6TH P.M., WELD COUNTY, COLORADO.
LOCATION: EAST OF AND ADJACENT TO CR 9.5; SOUTHO F AND ADJACENT TO CR 28.
Kim Ogle, Planning Services stated this site was originally reviewed as the Riverdance PUD(Z-528)and later
as the St.Vrain Lakes PUD(PF-1078)for up to 548 residential lots and 230 acres of open space with ongoing
oil and gas production. In this amendment to the Final Plan, the applicants are proposing to create 243
residential lots with 213 acres open space on approximately 369.37 acres of land for the 1st Filing. The
average lot size is 7400 square feet in area. Mr. Ogle noted that wet utilities including water, sanitation and
storm drainage are in the road right-of-way and all dry utilities are located in the rear of the lot in the easement.
He added that St. Vrain sanitation lines have been installed on site in the 151 Filing.
Easements were previously approved by the Weld County Utility Board in 2006 for a 5 foot utility easement at
the front of each lot and a 10 foot easement at the rear of each lot with no side yard easements. Mr. Ogle
stated that typically easements for rear and side lot lines wherever practical have a minimal total width of 20
feet, (10 feet each side of property line)and the front easement is a minimum of 15 feet for utilities. Previous
discussion in 2006 accepted these easements as the standard. Should there be an issue with limitations on
the size of these, the utility provider will sign the final plat and documents in the Utility Service Block.
Mr. Ogle stated that the applicant is in discussions with the Town of Firestone for annexation. Therefore we
most likely will review the 1s` Filing, Phase 1 of the development.
Staff would like to request that all utility service providers including CenturyLink and Source Gas be in the
Utility Signature Block on Page 1 of the Final Plan.
Galen Monson commented that utilities not being able to cross the open space would cause additional costs
as it would require two separate lines. Mr. Ogle stated that he believes the open space allows for utilities to
run through the open space. He added that there may not be an easement for that but that is something the
developer can look into that. Mr. Ogle noted that in this amendment the lots are a little bigger and the road
network which was previously a loop road system is now in cul de sacs.
Marc Savela, Brookfield Residential, stated that he represents Barefoot Lakes, said that typically the front
easement would include the gas service and the rear easement would include the telephone,cable and power.
With regard to the question of easements across the open space as well as the side yard lot lines, they
typically look to the utility provider once they have their full design and dedicate additional easements as
necessary. He said that crossing the open space will be decided when the plan is provided by the utility
provider.
Galen Monson referred to the easement on Tract C on Eagle River Road and asked to have a 10 foot
easement along the west side of Eagle River Road. Mr. Savela said that it is something they can review and
look at including that easement.
Wayne Howard asked what the easement is on the east side of Eagle River Road as it is not labeled. Mr.
Monson noted that there is a 25 foot landscape easement on the west side. Mr. Savela said that they could
clarify that on the plat. Mr. Howard asked if you can have a 25 foot landscape easement within the 10 foot
easement. Mr. Savela said that they will evaluate that and most likely will distinguish those two easements.
Wayne Howard referred to Sheet 11 of the plans and asked about the area west of Lot 1 where the river would
be there is a rectangular type of utility or easement and it is not called out for what that is intended for. Mr.
Savela said that he believed it is a storm easement going into the lake itself but will clarify that on the final plat.
Galen Monson noted that there is one side lot easement on Sheet 8 that might be required. He said it is
located on Block 9, Lot 8. Mr. Savela said that he would like to defer that until they have received a design
from the utility.
In summary,the changes include: 1) the 10 foot utility easement along the west side of Eagle River Road,2)
clarification of the 25 foot landscape easement within the 10 foot utility easement adjacent to Tract C, 3)
clarification of the storm easement going into the lake in Tract R, 4) clarification of the side lot easement of
Block 9 Lot 8, 5) clarification of the easement on the east side of Eagle River Road, and 6) include all utility
service providers in the Utility Service Block Signature.
Galen Monson moved to accept the plans along with the summarized changes as described, seconded by
LeAnn Koons. Motion carried unanimously.
Meeting adjourned at 10:32 a.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Digitally signed by Kristine Ranslem
e Date:2015.04.01 09:5349-06'00'
Kristine Ranslem
Secretary
PRESENTATION 3.26.2015 -- UTILITIES ADVISORY COMMITTEE
THIS SITE WAS ORIGINALLY REVIEWED AS THE RIVERDANCE PUD (Z-528) AND
LATER AS THE ST. VRAIN LAKES PUD (PF-1078) FOR UP TO 548 RESIDENTIAL
LOTS AND 230 ACRES OF OPEN SPACE WITH CONTINUING OIL AND GAS
PRODUCTION USES. THE SITE IS LOCATED EAST OF AND ADJACENT TO
COUNTY ROAD 9.5 AND SOUTH OF AND ADJACENT TO CR 28. THIS 1330 ACRE
SITE IS ZONED PUD WITH SEVERAL USES AND THREE SCHOOL SITES.
IN THE AMENDED FINAL PLAN, PUDF14-0009, THE PLAN IS TO CREATE 243
RESIDENTIAL LOTS (63 existing lots) WITH 213.1 ACRES OF OPEN SPACE ON
APPROXIMATELY 369.37 ACRES OF LAND. THE DENSITYIS 5.86 DU/AC WITH THE
AVERAGE LOT SIZE BEING 7433 SF IN AREA. THE SERVICE PROVIDERS REMAIN
THE SAME, LITTLE THOMPSON WATER DISTRICT, ST. VRAIN SANITATION,
UNITED POWER AND QWEST WITH QWEST NOW KNOWN AS CENTURY LINK FOR
TELEPHONE SERVICE. SOURCE GAS IS THE NATURAL GAS SERVICE PROVIDER.
THE WET UTILITIES, INCLUDING WATER, SANITATION AND STORM DRAINAGE
ARE IN THE ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY. ALL DRY UTILITIES ARE AT THE REAR OF
THE LOT IN EASEMENT. THERE IS AN EXISTING 16 INCH WATER LINE ON CR 28
AND IT DOWNSIZES FROM THERE. THERE IS A TRUNK LINE ADJACENT TO THE
LAKES. ST VRAIN SANITIATION LINES HAVE BEEN INSTALLED ON SITE.
FOR THIS APPLICATION, MOUNTAIN VIEW FIRE INDICATED THAT UTILITY PLANS
WILL NEED TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE FIRE DISTRICT FOR REVIEW AND
APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. (LUANN PENFOLD 11 .19.2014)
LITTLE THOMPSON WATER INDICATED THEY ARE CONTINUING TO WORK WITH
THE DEVELOPER AND HAVE NO OUTSTANDING ISSUES. (M. COOK, 1 .19.2015)
STAFF IS ALSO IN RECEIPT OF AN AMENDED AND RESTATED AGREEMENT FOR
WATER EXTENSIONS ENTERED INTO ON FEBRUARY 12, 2015 BETWEEN LTWD
AND BAREFOOT, LLC A BROOKFIELD RESIDENTIAL, LLC
WATER FOR IRRIGATION OF THE LANDSCAPE COMPONENT IS BEING
EVALUATED. ORIGINALLY IT WAS A DUAL POTABLE NON POTABLE SYSTEM
USING TREATED WATER FROM THE SOUTHERN LAKES FOR IRRIGATION,
HOWEVER, FOR THIS AMENDED FINAL PLAN FILING THE SOURCE OF THIS
WATER IS UNDER REVIEW. THE DEVELOPER'S REPRESENTATIVE IS PRESENT
AND MAY BE ABLE TO PROVIDE FURTHER COMMENT
EASEMENTS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BY THIS BOARD IN 2006 WERE FOR A FIVE
FOOT UTILITY EASEMENT ON THE FRONT AND A 10 FOOT EASEMENT IN THE
REAR OF EACH LOT. THERE ARE NO SIDE YARD EASEMENTS. THIS IS
REFLECTED ON THE BAREFOOT LAKES FILING NO. 1 DRAWING SET.
NORMALLY EASEMENTS FOR REAR AND SIDE LOT LINES WHENEVER
PRACTICAL AND SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM TOTAL WIDTH OF TWENTY (20) FEET
APPORTIONED EQUALLY ON ABUTTING PROPERTIES AND WHERE FRONT LINE
EASEMENTS ARE REQUIRED, A MINIMUM OF FIFTEEN (15) FEET SHALL BE
ALLOCATED AS A UTILITY EASEMENT.
PREVIOUS DISCUSSIONS IN 2006 WITH UTILITY SERVICE PROVIDERS ACCEPTED
THESE EASEMENTS AS STANDARD. SHOULD THERE BE AN ISSUE WITH THE
LIMITATIONS ON THE SIZE OF THE EASEMENTS, THE UTILITY SERVICE
PROVIDER WILL SIGN THE FINAL PLAN DOCUMENTS NOTING 1) SERVICE IS
AVAILABLE, 2) SERVICE IS AVAILABLE SUBJECT TO SPECIFIC CONDITIONS, OR 3)
SERVICE IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR THE PUD. IN THE EVENT NUMBER 2) IS
INDICATED, THE SPECIFIC CONDITION SHALL BE DESCRIBED. THE ACTION OF
OBTAINING SIGNATURES FROM UTILITY SERVICE PROVIDERS IS A
REQUIREMENT OF THE FINAL PLAN.
IN YOUR DOCUMENTS IS A LETTER FROM ROB FLECK WITH ST. VRAIN
SANITATION DATED MARCH 20, 2015 WHOSE AGENCY CONTINUES TO WORK
WITH THE APPLICANT TO ADDRESS THEIR ISSUES. STAFF RECEIVED A LETTER
FROM SV SAN DATED DECEMBER 3, 2013 IN RESPONSE TO A REQUEST FOR
REFERRAL FOR THE PROJECT. MANY OF THE SAME ISSUES PRESENTED IN THIS
LETTER ARE REFLECTED IN THE MARCH 2015 LETTER.
AS A GENERAL COMMENT, THIS FILING MAY BE THE LONE PHASE OF THE
DEVELOPMENT TO PROCEED THROUGH WELD COUNTY AS THE APPLICANT HAS
BEEN IN DISCUSSIONS WITH THE TOWN OF FIRESTONE CONCERNING
ANNEXATION OF THE DEVELOPMENT. THE TOWN OF FIRESTONE DID NOT
RETURN A REFERRAL RESPONSE CONCERNING THIS DEVELOPMENT.
THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT REQUESTS THAT SIGNATURE BLOCKS BE
PROVIDED FOR ALL UTILITY SERVICE AGENCIES, NOT ONLY THE AGENCIES
CURRENTLY LISTED. PLEASE CONSIDER TO ADD CENTURY LINK AND THE GAS
COMPANY IF APPLICABLE.
FIELD CHECK Inspection Date: April 18, 2015
CASE No: PUDF14-0009
APPLICANT: Marc Savela, Brookfield Residential Properties
6465 So. Greenwood Plaza Blvd., Suite 700, Colorado 80111
REQUEST: Planned Unit Development Final Plat - Amendment to First Filing, PF-1078 - Replat of
Lots 1-32, Block 7; Lots 1-11, Block 8; Lots 1-14 Block 9; Lots 10-17, Block 10; Lots 1-7,
Block 14 and Tract H (243 Lots with R-1 (Low Density Residential); C-1 (Neighborhood
Commercial); C-2 (General Commercial) Zone Uses and the Vacation of public road
right-of-way and continuing Oil and Gas Production Uses along with approximately 212
acres of open space consisting of a river corridor, private recreational lakes and
community parks in the 1-25 Regional Urbanization Area Overlay District- Barefoot Lakes
PUD
Zoning Land Use
N TOWN OF MEAD N AGRICULTURE W OIL &GAS ENCIMBRANCES
E PUD E AGRICULTURE W OIL &GAS ENCIMBRANCES
S PUD S RIVER CORRIDOR-SW WELD COUNTY BUILDING
W TOWN OF MEAD W AGRICULTURE W OIL &GAS ENCIMBRANCES
Comments:
COUNTY ROAD 9,5 SERVES AS THE WESTERN PROPERTY BOUNDARY,AND ST VRAIN CREEK SERVES AS
THE SOUTH BOUNDARY TO THE PROPJECT. PRESENT SITE CONDITION IS VACANT LANDS, WITH
SEVERAL PARCELS IN CROP PRODUCTION. PRIAIRE DOGS ARE PREVALENT TO THE NORTH AND EAST
OF THE PROPERTY. THERE IS ONE RESIDNECE IS THE NEAR VICINITY OF THIS FILIING,AND APPEARS TO
BE VACANT. COUNTY ROAD 28 IS A TWO LANE GRAVEL ROAD THAT HAS BEEN ANNEXED INTO THE
TOWN OF MEAD. COUNTY ROAD 9.5 IS MAINTAINED BY WELD COUNTY ADJACENT TO THIS FILING. THE
RIVER CORRIDOR IS IN THE PROCESS OF BEING RECONSTRUCTED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES
ON-GOING. MULTIPLE WELLHEADS AND TANK BATERIES ARE PREVALENT ACROSS THE ENTIRE 1313
ACRE SITE,AND ARE PRESENT IN THE FIRST FILING IN REVIEW HERE. CURB CUTS OFF OF COUNTY
ROAD 9.5 EXIST AND ARE READY FOR CONSTRUCTION OF ROADWAYS. NO VISIBLE VIOLATIONS WERE
IDENTIFIED
Signatur
❑ House(s) ❑ Outbuilding(s) ❑ Access to Property
❑ Crop Productions ❑ Crops ❑ Site Distance GOOD
❑ Oil&Gas Structures ❑ Wildlife—RIVER CORRIDOR
❑ Water Bodies ❑ Ditch ❑ Topography
Note any commercial business/commercial vehicles that are operating from the site. NONE
Hello