The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20152612.tiff RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT APPLICATION FOR OUTDOOR LIGHTING REPLACEMENT AND AUTHORIZE CHAIR TO SIGN WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board has been presented with Supplemental Environmental Project Application for Outdoor Lighting Replacement from the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, on behalf of the Department of Buildings and Grounds, to Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, commencing July 29, 2015, with further terms and conditions being as stated in said application, and WHEREAS, after review, the Board deems it advisable to approve said application, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the Supplemental Environmental Project Application for Outdoor Lighting Replacement from the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, on behalf of the Department of Buildings and Grounds, to Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment be, and hereby is, approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the Chair be, and hereby is, authorized to sign said application. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 3rd day of August, A.D., 2015, nunc pro tunc July 29, 2015. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO ATTEST: dorylet) ,vk x../(.4A L arbbaara(KKirkmeyer, hair Weld County Clerk to the Board Mike Freeman, Pro-Tem BY: � � 1 �� t. I' 11/..I . � .��►� �- �,� -duty Clerk to the Board ` . ��, T f - an P. Coray � ( r 41 APPR ED AS • ORM: ` ( ,�:, 4 •Mrs. oun ttorney l ' '�; •\ or Steve Moreno Date of signature: 81/3 CC•zittl,. [tee $/,-7 2015-2612 BG0017 r 1864_ �. ar Weld r 1 Supplemental Environmental Project APPLICATION COVER SHEET et . Tk).: 1 Project Title : Weld County Outdoor Lighting Replacement Organization : Weld County Address : 1150 0 Street City, State, Zip : Greeley, CO 80631 E-Mail Address : gvergara@co . weld . co . us Website Address: www . co . weld . co . us Phone Number: ( 970 ) 304-6415, ext . 2226 Fax Number: ( 970 ) 304-6411 Federal Tax Identification Number: Legal Tax Status (check one ) : Nonprofit* X Governmental Entity/School * If nonprofit, you must attach a copy of your IRS tax exempt letter to this SEP Application By signing and submitting this application , the applicant agrees to operate the program as described in the SEP Application and in accordance with the Department' s SEP Policy . The applicant agrees that the information provided in this application is, to the best of the applicant' s knowledge and based on reasonable inquiry, true, accurate, and complete . The applicant understands that knowingly submitting any false information on this application could result in the project not being considered for funding or voiding any current or future contracts with the Department of Public Health and Environment . Barbara Kirkmeyer Print name of Authorized Official : Signature of Authorized Official : * Please insert electronic signature into the box on the right / Date : 7/29/2015 Title : Chair, Board of Weld County Commissioners Project Manager or Main Project Contact : Name : Toby Taylor Title : Director, Buildings & Grounds Address : 1105 H Street E - Mail : ttaylor@co . weld . co . us Phone : 970-304-6531 , ext . 2023 Total Amount of SEP Funds Requested : $ 333, 925 Total Matching/In - Kind Contributions : $ 38, 395 ( oversight & administration ) Total Project Cost : $ 372, 320 2015-2.612 Page 1 of 8 y _ r ' Weld oun tei r ; tr Supplemental Environmental Project APPLICATION COVER SHEET Project Title Weld County Outdoor Lighting Replacement Geographical The geographical area to benefit most directly from this project includes the county of Weld , Area to Benefit Most Directly with a greater concentration in those municipalities where County facilities are located , From Project including the cities of Greeley and Fort Lupton , as well as the 1 -25 and Hwy 119 corridor . X Pollution Prevention Eligible SEP Environmental Restoration and Protection Category Environmental Education and Training Weld County is requesting supplemental environmental project ( SEP ) funding to replace existing traditional light bulbs ( metal halide and high pressure sodium ) in the outdoor lighting of all its facilities with more energy efficient LED ( light-emitting diode ) bulbs, in order to increase energy efficiency and reduce air emissions . According to a recent report by the U . S . Department of Energy ( DOE ) , widespread use of LED lighting has the greatest potential impact on energy savings in the United States . By 2030, energy savings, nationally, from LEDs can be up to 300 terawatt- hours (TWh ) , or the Project equivalent annual energy output of about fifty ( 1 , 000 megawatt ) power plants . These energy savings would also reducegreenhousegas ( GHG )g ( G G ) emissions by 210 million metric y tons of carbon and decrease the electricity consumption equivalent to powering 24 million homes http ://apps1 . eere . energy .gov/ buildings/publications/ pdfs/ssl/ssl energy-savings- report " an - 2012 . pdf) . Page 2 of 8 Problem Statement : Homes and commercial buildings use a large amount of energy for heating, cooling, lighting, and other functions, contributing to 12 % of the annual greenhouse gas ( GHG ) emissions in the United States . In 2012 , metropolitan Denver and the northern Front Range , including a large portion of Weld County ( see Attachment A ) , were classified as a " marginal " nonattainment area by the U . S . Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA ) . A nonattainment area is one in which air quality does not meet the ozone standards set forth by the federal government . • People exposed to hazardous air pollutants at sufficient concentrations and durations may have an increased chance of getting cancer or experience other serious health effects, including damage to the immune system or neurological , reproductive , developmental , and respiratory problems . Some hazardous air pollutants can deposit onto soils or surface waters ( http ://www . epa . gov/oagps001/community/basicinfo . html#2 ) , contaminating the food and water we consume . N The World Health Organization estimates that 3 . 7 million premature deaths worldwide can be attributed to ambient ( outdoor) air pollution ; and that most sources of outdoor air pollution are beyond the control of individuals and demand action by local government and policymakers (www . who . int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs313/en/) . Goal : Improve the outdoor air quality in Weld County . Project Objective : Description Reduce the amount of energy used from the outdoor lighting of all Weld County facilities, resulting in reduced air emissions . Strategies : Replace the existing light bulbs in all outdoor light fixtures at all Weld County facilities with more energy efficient, LED light bulbs . Technical Information : Currently the County uses either Metal Halide ( HD ) or High Pressure Sodium ( HPS ) light bulbs in its outdoor lights . Both use a greater amount of energy and emit more heat ( contributing to greenhouse gas emissions ) compared to LED lights . LEDs have recently emerged as one of today' s most energy efficient and rapidly growing technologies . LEDs are beginning to be used in a wide range of applications because of their unique characteristics, including compact size, ease of maintenance, resistance to breakage, the ability to focus light in a single direction , and they emit almost no heat . In outdoor lighting, LEDs are aiding in the sustainability initiatives of corporations and municipalities across the nation . WalMart now uses LED technology to meet voluntary energy-saving specifications for high -efficiency parking lot lighting . The company reports energy savings of 58% compared with ASHRAE Standard 90 . 1 - 2010, a widely used commercial building code . In comparing the performance of LED roadway lighting with HPS lighting, in New York City, LEDs showed energy savings from 26 to 57% ( http ://energy .gov/energysaverJarticles/leds-future- lighting- here ) . Page 3 of 8 Even in 2009 and 2010, CALiPER ( Commercially Available LED Product Evaluation and Reporting ) testing showed that many LED parking-structure and wallpack fixtures already met or exceeded the light output and efficacy levels of their metal halide , high - pressure sodium , and induction counterparts, while also displaying more uniform light distribution . Evaluated on a lifecycle cost basis, solid -state lighting products, like LEDs, can be competitive in parking lot applications because of their energy savings, directionality, controllability, aesthetic appeal , and maintenance savings ( http ://energy .gov/eere/ssl/caliper-testing ) . From an environmental perspective, energy efficiency has the advantage of addressing multiple air pollutants simultaneously with a single strategy . NOTE: LED lights were chosen for this project, over compact fluorescent lights (CFL), another energy efficient light, because they last longer (up to 10 times longer than CFLs), are more durable, are mercury free, and emit less heat. I Page 4of8 0 It has been demonstrated that energy efficiency measures, like we are proposing, to reduce the amount of energy used , can have a positive impact on air quality by reducing air emissions . Improving air quality will , in turn , have a positive impact on the health of Weld County residents . Expected Environmental or Public It is estimated that this project will result in a energy usage ( measured in kilowatts ) Health reduction of 56% and result in the following air emission reductions : Protection • CO2 ( Carbon Dioxide ) : 239 tons • SO2 ( Sulfur Dioxide ) : 204 lbs . and Improvement • NO, ( Nitrogen Oxide ) : 100 lbs . In addition to these air emission reductions, this project has the potential to avoid the amount of coal burned by 12 tons and reduce atmospheric mercury contamination by 526 • mg . ( see Attachment B ) . Based on analyses conducted ( as detailed in section above ) , it is anticipated that the implementation of this project will result in reduced energy consumption ( electricity ) and a reduction in air emissions . The success of this project will be evaluated using pre- and Project post- energy usage data provided by Xcel Energy . Using either DOE - 2 Building Energy Use and Cost Evaluation Analysis software or EPA' s AVoided Emissions and geneRation Tool ( AVERT) , this data will and also be used to calculate air emission reductions . Measurable Results Project results will be communicated to the public via a press release to local media outlets, as well as social media ( Facebook and Twitter) . Project results will also be communicated to all municipalities in Weld County, and other interested organizations, upon request, as a resource for those who may be considering similar projects . Page 5of8 Good air quality is important to Weld County residents . According to the 2013 Community Health Survey Conducted by the Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment, 53 % of the responding residents said polluted outdoor air was a problem . A project, such as this one , that will greatly benefit the air quality for all Weld County residents and result in cost-savings to the County, would be well received and supported by Feasibility of the community . However, the initial cost of converting from traditional outdoor lighting to Successful the more energy efficient, LED lighting, on such a large scale ( over 400 existing lights ) would Implementation be impractical for the county to implement without outside funding . Weld County staff has researched what LED lighting is currently available and has found LED lights that would work with our current fixtures, with minimal retro-fitting . After completion of the project, Weld County is committed to maintaining the new LED lights and ensuring that any new outdoor lighting installed will also use only LED lights . g Matching Total Budget o Description SEP Cost or In-kind Category� Cost Funds Toby Taylor Director of Buildings & Grounds 40 hrs . @ $ 56/hr. + Fringe ( 39% ) $ 3 , 112 $ 3, 112 ( project oversight ) Personnel Gabrielle Vergara Environmental Health Program Coordinator 40 hrs . @ $ 34/hr . + Fringe ( 39% ) $ 1, 890 $ 1, 890 ( administrative support ) Project Materials and B To be included in the contract bid . udget Supplies Major Equipment n/a Contractor/ Entire project will be contracted to an Subcontractor outside vendor, who will supply and install $333, 925 $ 333, 925 bulbs . * Other Direct n/a Costs Indirect Costs 10% of all direct costs. $ 33 , 393 $ 33 , 393 Total : $333, 925 $38,395 $372,320 * see Attachments C and D for cost estimate ( including bulbs and labor) Page 6 of 8 Estimated costs for the project were developed after speaking with representatives from two different LED lighting companies . The estimated per bulb cost varies between $ 175 and $ 650 ( see Attachment C ) depending on light fixture type ( i . e . , flood light vs . parking lot light pole ) . The hourly labor cost is estimated at $ 100 per hour which includes labor, equipment, and overhead costs for the selected contractor . All work to be completed , including the Bud et acquisition and installation of bulbs, will be contracted out . Please see Attachment D in the g Appendix for a breakdown of the associated costs by County facility . Discussion pp y No other funding sources have been secured for this project . The county is not asking for SEP funding for personnel or indirect costs to oversee and administer the project. The project has the potential to be scaled down to include a lesser number of facilities ( for lighting replacement ) . Activities Staff Responsible Date * Develop bid for project, to include bulbs and Toby Taylor 12/ 1/2015 installation . Contractor selected for bulbs and installation . Toby Taylor 1/31/2016 Project Project implemented/completed . Selected Contractor 5/30/2016 Schedule/ Work Plan Status Report Gabrielle Vergara 6/30/2016 Measurement of energy saved and emissions reduced , Toby Taylor / one year post installation , for evaluation purposes . Gabrielle Vergara 5/30/2017 Final Report Gabrielle Vergara 6/30/2017 * All dates could be pushed back 2 -3 months depending on submission of bids; if initial bids are not acceptable, then the project will be put out for bid again . Toby Taylor, Director of the Weld County Buildings & Grounds Department, will act as the project manager. He has over 27 years of experience managing all aspects of general services and facility maintenance , including HVAC, electrical , plumbing, electronics, custodial, grounds, security, transportation operations, procurement, budgets, and capital construction projects . As the Buildings and Grounds Director for Weld County, Toby' s responsibilities include : • Development of an annual $ 6 million operating budget for the maintenance of Weld County' s 104 buildings, across 4, 000 square miles . Experience • Bid specifications and procurement to support department' s needs while ensuring and appropriate risk management . Qualifications • Oversight of capital improvements and construction . • Management of contracted services . • Administration of the County' s Public Transportation/Transit program . • Inventory and disposal of surplus County property . Recent capital improvement projects he has overseen include the Northern Colorado Forensics Crime Lab in 2014, and the construction of the new 911 Communications Tower in 2013 ; just two examples of many . Prior to coming to work for Weld County, Toby served 21 years in the U . S . Air Force . He has • a MBA from Southwestern College, Kansas . Page 7of8 x The applicant has reviewed the reporting requirements below and if selected for SEP funding, agrees to adhere to these requirements . Applicant's Biannual Status Reports The applicant will submit a biannual project status report to the Department's SEP Coordinator with a copy to Noble Energy. Status reports will be submitted using the Department' s template and include the following information : • A description of activities completed to date ; • A budget summary table listing funds expended to date by budget category; and • A discussion of any anticipated changes to the project scope or timeline . Applicant's Final SEP Completion Report The applicant will submit the SEP Completion Report to the Department' s SEP Coordinator with a copy to Noble Energy within 30 days of project completion . The applicant's Final SEP Completion Report will be submitted using the Department' s template, and will contain at a minimum : Reporting • A detailed description of the project as implemented ; • A summary table identifying project deliverables and tasks along with the associated completion date ; • A description of any operating problems encountered and the solutions thereto ; • A full expense accounting including itemized costs, documented by copies of purchase orders , contracts, receipts or canceled checks; • Demonstration that the SEP has been fully implemented in accordance with the SEP application ; • A description of the environmental or public health protection and improvement resulting from implementation of the SEP along with quantification of the outcomes and benefits; • Examples of brochures, educational or outreach materials developed or produced as part of the SEP ; and • Photographs documenting both project implementation and results . Depending on the project scope , the Department may also require the applicant to develop and submit a case study with the final report. Noble Energy requires a copy of the Applicant's Biannual Status Reports and Applicant' s Final SEP Completion Report . These reports will be used by Noble Energy to comply with the Consent Decree requirement that Noble Energy submit a SSEP Completion Report to CDPHE within 60 days of the completion of each of the SSEPs . Weld County has a long standing history of developing sustainable programs to improve the Other overall environment for its residents . One such example includes the household hazardous Relevant waste program . This program accepts household hazardous waste from all Weld County residents, for free , to dispose of in a more environmentally friendly manner . Since 1994, this Information has prevented over 7 million pounds of household hazardous program waste from going to our landfills . II Page 8of8 Attachement A: Non -Attainment Map for Colorado E I 3 I iiiiiiir, 1 i OS 4it W 4C 42 47. 1 " N ��y .•"rtn . t a lio a.544 s a •• ..• a•• :. MOO v 419IQ1'.A•••sa•use(SO n*elf♦fana•rtsta.•wOMM•f set•.•as•••Q•a•..a,•as a e a a sass.r;.•1.1•... 19 I AC 6 w ,lY ._r: .} 1 0' CO. 4C" }vast I 5 ..o•. . o...i . . f•x.wacn•ws�i t•44Cn I 7 4 Fort ► # RoKrA i� National . Y, Grmeley Ite.00 I,41 Tfm 3 ) POity tit N .r• & A' i e f I i Bauder dO ,ors.# 4 -etrt 1.-.., � frnT „TY•lyei♦ r1�. .• � O lr fiC'71 ri1C •l a1 `at �z,,.g, _ Airport_•` ,rwr r _ .. r t t IY - tar: ,1 t re,..asp+alor.ee ..-.--w.._.--.,trwa•n. • {, 15 ♦! wr aws.�-.•� —., _--_r.+rara�+n. —..�....�._ ....Sr 4_28(4- r A. Iargi �V. ast ' Rock 4 t 4 , i / 1 -..,.,. Sift Legend i 1 t t i Ozone Monitor-my Stations ` i Montarirg Mon hon $ guFpbtd ry the tea Iv. -..--+erxrr.��r-rr:..er..sn.wrwt d-n....-.rw.'�aroe�s'+.ns.-. .raaaa.-xmwxiw-.ovnw.nr...+a.•.rh}. • _ 1 £ 1 Denver Boulder Greeley - Fort Collins, Colorado Eigh .-Hour Ozone Control Area DRC G kris tient Cast b tittitsim ware fl. rt ilwnn.es Carte Attachment B: Energy Savings & Air Emissions Reduction Analyses / Bollard Style Lights ( page 1 of 4) glo s s yer Energy & Maintenance Savings Analysis and Payback Executive Summary WELD COUNTY GOV Address GREELEY, COLORADO 7=23=15 Project# • ROI/Payback (Yrs) 3.00 Crossover system System KW Reduction 2.98 S00 00000 4F Allemate System System KW Reduction o/ 55.05% Crossover System Alternate System Total Initial Fixture & Installation Costs $0.00 $0.00 S50�0° %AIV Total System KW 2.43 5.41 -',i Cost of Energy per KWH %�� $0.10 $0.10 s.000000 / �" KVUH ntlanon Rate (percentage/year) 5.00% 5.00% Annual Average Energy Cost $1,330.44 $2,960.12 o I / ' [average including inflation) 530 000 00 ... .._ -...._ _.. .....-_... _.._----- _. ._.. - .. _ . _. Annual Average Maintenance Cost $2,366.48 Total Annual Average Energy + Maintenance Costs $1,330.44 $5,326.59 (average including inflation) 70x000 '- .._.- 1st Year Energy & Maintenance Savings • $3,996.15 5 Year Total Energy & Maintenance Savings ,- -$19.980.76 _ * 10 Year Total Energy & Maintenance Savings • $39,961.53 • 41 Greenhouse Gas Equivalencies - Annual Savings - '4 soon ' --- — — — ry /r Total Cost ?red-leaf 3r0 Year 4th/ear $h-rear Rh Year ?M Year ith +ear ;e+Year IOU"Year CO2 Gas Reduction - Metric Tons 9.47 Year CO2 Emissions from Gallons of Gasoline Consumed 1,030.79 CO2 Emissions from the Energy use of #Homes 0.52 Carbon sequestered annually by #Acres of forests 7.57 US EPA - Greenhouse Gas Equivalencies Calculator Ihttp:!/www.epa.govlcleanenergy/energy-resourceslcalculator.html This estimator 's(a iilustratrve purposes only ._al Industries Inc dOes not m any way mply a warranty of o rfamance a savings predicted by this rep°n lesof Industries' lm man Inngnuon Through Technology A sneart1Asbea for the Future 7014 LS$induUnes Inc 10000 Dance Road•Celamm. 3M 15242 USA•-•••wje.nduanes.crm 15131 7t113EA I Attachement B: Energy Savings & Air Emissions Reduction Analyses / Parking Lot Pole Style Lights ( page 2 of 4) Cry c'er Energy & Maintenance Savings Analysis and Payback Executive Summary WELD COUNTY GOV Address GREELE, COLORADO 42208 Project# ROI/Payback (Yrs) 0.00 ..rossover System System KW Reduction 65.05 s>x om e— cte,n"` System System KW Reduction % 56.50% Crossover System Alternate System 5800 CM() . -- Total Initial Fixture & Installation Costs $0.00 $0.00 A 5700 000 00 Total System KW 50.09 115.14 J All.- Cost of Energy Per KWH $0.10 $0.10 i ._1800 G00 00 r--. - -- --:.- - . .- - - .._ • KWH nflanon Rate percentage/year' 5.00% 5.00% I A Annual Average Energy Cost $27,402.55 $62,989.04 SSW 00000 average including inflation) tie I a ' Annual Average Maintenance Cost $18,851.14 "a S4o0 000 00 / e Total Annual Average Energy + Maintenance Costs $27,402.55 I $81,840.18 Z (average including inflation) ZdAl 1st Year Energy & Maintenance Savings 354,437.64 M .4 5 Year Total Energy & Maintenance Savings $272,188. .8 5200.000 00 ►- --- ------- . _ ...__.---.• __._..--.•-- -_ -_ -.._-.-•- ---.- ._._ �....--•.--_- . ------_..-10 Year Total Energy & Maintenance Savings 5544,376.35 -Air 4 - - - -- stoo.0o00o i ,.'. 4,- ar S i Greenhouse Gas Equivalencies - Annual Savings • $000 its Yr raw Cofi The Year 3rd Yea W1 Year s111 Year 5th Year TIT Year 3m Year 341 Year 10th Yew C02 Gas Reduction - Metric Tons I 206.78 Year C02 Emissions from Gallons of Gasoline Consumed L 22,508.95 1 CO2 Emissions from the Energy use of #Homes 11.40 Carbon sequestered annually by #Acres of forests 165.26 US EPA Greenhouse Gas Equivalencies Calculator http_r/www.epa_gpvlcleanenergy/energtresourceslcalculator.html rh's estimator ts for illt stratrve purposes only .Si Indu51ne5 Inc does nd. .n any way. imply a warranty of performance or savings predicted by this report Ls' Industries' .lrrmcan innovation Ihrovgh Technology A SmareVlslon•for the Future 2014 151 inauries Inc '0000 Aewice Read•Ondmri.ON 45242 USA r w+ealw'duen acan i5131 193-3200 Attachmnet B : Energy Savings & Air Emissions Reduction Analyses / Flood Style Lights ( page 3 of 4 ) Weld County Retrofit Analysis Simple Payback July 24, 2015 Prepared for: Weld County Project Address 0 Project City, State, Zip Code , CO Prepared by: Ryon Ryall Phone: Email: ryan@ryallgroup.comProposed Difference Total Qty of Light Fixtures 39 39 0 Total Qty of Poles 0 0 0 Electrical Information Electricity Rate ($/kwh ) S 0.0900 $ 0.0900 Total Lighting Electric Load (kW) 7.869 1.912 Annual Lighting Electric Use (kWh) 34,466 8,375 % , )U , Annual Cost of Electricity $ 3,101.96 $ 753.71 $ i 348.25 Financial Information Fixture Cost Investment: $ $ 11,670.00 Fixture Total Rebates: $ - $ - Fixture Cost Less Rebates: $ - $ 11,670.00 I $ (11,670. 00) Additional Initial Costs: $ - $ - Installation Cost: $ - $ 1,365.00 Pole Cost: $ - $ - Total Initial Costs: $ - $ 13,035.00 $ (13,035. 00) Average Annual Lamp Replacement Costs: $ 1,150.50 $ 1,150.50 Additional Annual Costs: $ 876.00 $ - Average Annual Costs: $ 5,128.46 $ 753.71 $ 4,374.75 Payback Informatio `" Simple Payback (Years) using Fixture Difference: Uses cixr;, re Cost Less Rebates Differenc 2 . 67 Net Savings (Using Fixture Cost Ewa Year# Less Rebates Difference) 1 $ (7,295.25) 2 $ (2,920.50) 3 $ 1,454.25 4 $ 5,829.00 5 $ 10,203. 75 6 $ 14,578.50 7 $ 18,953.25 8 $ 23,328.00 9 $ 27, 702. 74 10 $ 32,077.49 ,._ s11 Groupj .." OYV.M - . i., ROI Calculator Version: v2.1 Attachment B : Energy Savings & Air Emissions Reduction Analyses / Flood Style Lights cont . ( page 4 of 4 ) iiti Ryall Multiple Systems Group Energy Estimator Calculate the energy costs associated with existing and proposed lighting systems and (optional) show environmental impact. Click on the first green cell and tab to the other input cells . Energy Rate ($ per kWh) 0. 09 Existing Systems Proposed System Existing Fixture Watts/F Hr burn Energy $ per Proposed Fixture Watts/F Hr burn Energy $ per Systems count ixture per year yr. Systems count ixture per year yr. 250W HPS 17 305 4380 $2 . 044 Atlas 84W LED Flood 17 84 4380 $563 100W MH 32 122 4380 $ 1 , 539 Atlas 22W LED Flood 32 22 4380 $278 Energy used per yr. ( Existing System) $3 , 583 Energy used per yr. (Proposed System) $840 Electrical Load (kilo-watts) (Existing System ) 9 . 1 Electrical Load (kilo-watts) (Proposed System) 2 . 1 Potential Energy Savings per year $2 , 742 kilo-Watt load reduction 7 . 0 Estimated total cost for complete upgrade $ 11 .670 Simple Payback (based on 52 energy savings alone) I months Cost of Waiting $229 $2, 742 (Cost of postponing the Lighting Upgrade ) per month or per year Environmental Impact of Lighting Upgrade Changing your lights can benefit the environment! Annual Carbon Dioxide 46 . 926 21 . 928 Equivalent acres of forest 6 emission reduction lbs . Coal burning avoided lbs . Or added acres Annual Sulfur Dioxide 184 (EPA Nov. 2004) 10 Equivalent cars removed 4 emission reduction lbs . tons from road for a year cars Annual Nitrogen Oxide 90 Atmospheric mercury 474 50% 9 p US Electric Power is from coal-burning (NO, NO2) reduction lbs . contamination avoided mg . power plants . Numbers used (based on EPA Energy Star Facts and Assumptions sheet. 2007) Emission Factors : gases Carbon dioxide and mercury released Annual carbon dioxide (lbs . ) released per kWh of electricity per lb . of coal burned (EPA 2007) seqestration by forest and generated (EPA 2007) (can vary based on type of coal) emission by cars (EPA 2007) lbs . of CO2 released 1 . 54 lbs . of CO2 generated 2. 14 CO2 sequestration per acre 8066 CO2 emission per average lbs . of SO2 released 0. 006 lbs . of mercury released 0 . 0216 11 . 470 car lbs . of NO, released 0. 003 Click here to open EPA Energy Star Facts and Assumptions sheet, 2007. I Customer: Weld County, CO 1 17/24/2015 Prepared by : Ryan Ryall - Ryall Group - ryan@ryallgroup . com The Lighting Assistant is a tool offered by GE that examines the projected impact of lighting decisions. Neither this tool nor the analysis generated by this tool, in any way constitutes or implies either a warranty of lamp or ballast performance or a guarantee of the actual costs or savings that will be realized or the appropriateness of the solutions suggested. Kindly see and examine the Full Disclaimer: use of this tool constitutes your acceptance of the Full Disclaimer. Copyright © 2006 General Electric Company. All Rights Reserved. Attachment D: Per Bulb Cost Estimate e 111) r14DEPENDENT ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTOR **QUOTATION** *** REGULAR SALE **** Order Number Pa.e eWCO ] s196THAvE.I 1588758-00 1 ncorporated GREELEY. CO 80631 I Date Ordered Shipping Iristtucuons ShtplReq d 970-352- 024 FAX970.35!-0420 +rwot►sAir rererar 05/04 / 2015 05 / 04 /2015 L Ship to -- - Bill !o WELD COUNTY GOV . *BLDG & GRNDS* WELD COUNTY GOV . *BLDG & GRNDS * P . O . BOX 758 P . O . BOX 758 GREELEY CO 80632 GREELEY CO 80632 Regn. No inside SaiesmarVoutside Salesman Customer Number j Your Purchase Order Number . Telephone Number Terms ; Grven By t CU / HSW1 704505 I _JOHN RAYBURN 970 - 304 - 6531 1 - 1/2% 10TH PROX i Unej Item Number Description Ordered Shipped Back Ordered Unit Price UM Amount i - - . 1 LSIX.AMUFLED128450C LSI XAMU- F - LED - 128 - 450 -CW- UE - 1. 640 . 000 E 640 . 00 BRZ 2 LSIXBVRDIDLED2 44 00 LSI XH4`RD IDLED24 400CW UE BRZ 1 1 545 . 000 E 545 . 00 * *BOLLARD * * 3 ATLPFS22LED ATLAS PFS22LED FLOOD LIGHT 1 174 . 940 S 174 . 94 4 ATLPFLS4LED ATLAS PFL84LED FLOOD 1 440 . 420 E 440 . 42 . i 4 • � 1 i I i Punt Name. _ _ Suntotal 1800 . 36 "REPRINT" 3 Printed Filled By Signature. _. S & H . 00 107/09/15 Terms •of Sale: PURCHASER AGREES TO THE FOLLOWING: 108:00:00 Packages All accotnt Invances axe :nee in hull at the fecal office of Newca, nc In x Delete the 'Ott, lay of the month Wowing me month at sale, and _ Sales Tax . 00 In account la ;n defau.$ d etpt paid by the 24th or that month It the account c an deteu& a ;ate Payment charge tFPNA.NCE CHARGE! may be i -"posed canned at a rate ol 2%per month, ;AN ANNUAL PERCENTAGE RATE OF 24%), cc such amot nts as are legatry permissible. - insect on the unpaid balance vrtth a minimum charge ol SI 00 •nterest shall accrue at that 'ate on The full balance tape Urer► the obis-often +c oatd ,n lull In addetton, .r placed with an anneney !or.tl*cttcn, "e :talc-Met agrees to pny *11 c*Sts x .e4tt tion inducing a reasonable Total >» »» 1800 . 36 .it-curt of attorney 'eta I I Attachment D: Cost Estimate by Location (including labor) Materials Labor Building I Fixture Type Quantity Cost Each for (LED) Materials Total Labor Hours Labor Rate Labor Total — 1150 & West Parking Lot Park Lot Light (250 HPS) 26 $650 $ 16,900 52 $100 $5,200 Sign Lights 0 $175 $0 0 $100 $0 Flag Pole Light 0 $450 $0 0 $ 100 $0 .. 1400 Park Lot Light (250 HPS) 6 $650 $3,900 12 $100 $1,200 Sign Lights (70 HPS) ? $175 5350 4 $100 $400 Flag Pole Light (250 HPS) 2 $450 $900 4 $100 $400 1401 Park Lot Light (400 MH ) 4 $650 $2,600 8 $100 $800 Sign Lights (70 MH ) 2 $ 175 $350 2 $100 $200 Flag Pole Light ( 100 MH) 1 $450 _ $450 1 $100 $100 I 1402 Park Lot Light (250 HPS) 6 $650 $3,900 12 $100 $1,200 Sign Lights (70 HPS) 2 S175 $350 4 $ 100 $400 Flag Pole Light (250 HPS) 2 $450 S900 4 $100 $400 1551 Dispatch Park Lot Light (250 HPS) 7 $650 $4,550 14 $100 $1,400 Sign Lights 0 $ 175 $0 0 $100 $0 Flag Pole Light (250 HPS) 2 $450 _ $900 $100 $200 Alternative Programs Park Lot Light (400 HPS) 8 $650 $5,200 16 $100 $1,600 Sign Lights 0 $ 175 $0 0 $ 100 $0 Flag Pole Light 0 $450 $0 0 $100 $0 Ambulance/North Park Lot Light ( 150 HPS) 2 $650 $1,300 4 $100 $400 Sign Lights 0 $175 $0 0 $100 $0 Flag Pole Light 0 $450 50 0 $100 $0 B&G Park Lot Light (250 HPS) 4 $650 $2,600 8 $100 $800 Sign Lights 3 $175 SO 0 $ 100 $0 Flag Pole Light 0 $450 $0 0 $100 $0 Centennial Center Park Lot Light (250 HPS) 12 $650 $7,800 24 $100 $2,400 Sign Lights (70 HPS) 6 $ 175 $1,050 12 $100 $1,200 Flag Pole Light ( 175 MH) 4 $450 $1,800 8 5100 $800 Community Corrections Park Lot Light (400 HPS) 19 $650 $12,350 38 $ 100 $3,800 Sign Lights 0 $ 175 $0 0 5100 $0 Flag Pole Light ( 100 MH) 3 $450 $1,350 6 $100 $600 Bollards ( 100 MH) 4 $550 $2,200 8 $ 100 $800 Crime Lab Park Lot Light (250 HPS) 5 $650 $3,250 10 $100 $ 1,000 Sign Lights 0 $175 $0 0 $100 $0 Flag Pole Light ( 100 MH) 3 $450 $1,350 6 $100 $600 _ Fuel Site Park Lot Light (250 HPS) 12 $650 $7,800 24 $ 100 52,400 Sign Lights 0 $175 $0 0 $100 So Flag Pole Light 0 $450 $0_ 0 $100 $0 * Human Services Park Lot Light (400 HIPS) 13 $650 $8,450 26 $100 $2,600 Sign Lights 0 $ 175 $0 0 $100 $0 Flag Pole Light 0 $450 $0 0 $100 $0 Bollards (LU 50) 9 $550 $4,950 18 $100 $ 1,800 Jury & Court Parking Park Lot Light ( 1,000 MH ) 19 $650 $12,350 38 $100 $3,800 Sign Lights 0 $ 175 $0 0 $100 $0 Flag Pole Light 0 $450 $0 0 $100 $0 Law Admin Park Lot Light (250 HPS) 13 $650 $8,450 26 $100 $2,600 Sign Lights 0 $175 $0 0 $100 $0 Flag Pole Light 0 $450 $0 0 $ 100 $0 Bollards (70 HPS) 10 $550 $5,500 20 $100 $2,000 _ Motor Pool Park Lot Light (250 HPS) 15 $650 $9,750 30 $ 100 $3,000 Sign Lights (250 HPS) 1 $175 $ 175 2 S100 $200 Flag Pole Light ( 100 MH) 2 $450 $900 4 $100 $400 North Jail Park Lot Light (400 HPS) 32 $650 $20,800 64 $100 $6,400 Sign Lights ( 100 MH) 2 $175 $350 4 $100 $400 Flag Pole Light ( 100 MH) 3 $450 $1,350 6 $100 $600 Bollards (70 MHS) 11 $550 $6,050 22 $100 $2,200 Planning/Health Park Lot Light (400 HPS) 28 5650 $ 18,200 56 $ 100 $5,600 Sign Lights ( 100 MH) 2 $175 $350 4 $100 $400 Flag Pole Light ( 100 MH ) 2 $450 $900 4 $ 100 $400 Public Works Park Lot Light (250 HPS) 18 $650 $11,700 36 $ 100 $3,600 Sign Lights 0 $175 SO 0 $ 100 50 Flag Pole Light 6 $450 $2,700 12 $ 100 $1,200 S.E.S.C. Park Lot Light (250 HPS) 9 $650 55,850 18 $100 $1,800 Sign Lights 0 S175 $0 0 $ 100 $0 Flag Pole Light 3 $450 $ 1,350 6 $100 $600 Bollards ( 100 HPS) 10 $550 $5,500 20 $100 $2,000 S.W.S.C. Park Lot Light (250 HPS) 26 $650 516,900 52 5100 $5,200 Sign Lights 0 $175 50 0 $100 $0 Flag Pole Light 2 $450 $900 4 $100 $400 Bollards (50 MH) 24 , $550 $13,200 48 $ 100 $4,800 Training Center Park Lot Light (250 HPS) 12 $650 $7,800 24 $100 $2,400 Sign Lights 2 $175 $350 4 $100 $400 Flag Pole Light 3 S450 _ $1,350 6 $100 _ $600 I Materials Total $250,225 Labor Total $83,700 Grand Total : $333,925 Hello