HomeMy WebLinkAbout20151493.tiff RESOLUTION
RE: APPROVE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION FOR
ROADS(FEMA)AND AUTHORIZE CHAIR TO SIGN
WHEREAS,the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County,Colorado,pursuant to
Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of
administering the affairs of Weld County,Colorado,and
WHEREAS,the Board has been presented with a Community Development Block Grant
Application for Roads(FEMA)from the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the
Board of County Commissioners of Weld County,to the Colorado Department of Public Safety,
Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, commencing upon full execution,
with further terms and conditions being as stated in said application,and
WHEREAS, after review, the Board deems it advisable to approve said application, a
copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of
Weld County, Colorado, that the Community Development Block Grant Application for Roads
(FEMA) from the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of County
Commissioners of Weld County, to the Colorado Department of Public Safety, Division of
Homeland Security and Emergency Management,be,and hereby is,approved.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the Chair be, and hereby is, authorized
to sign said application.
The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted
by the following vote on the 27th day of May,A.D.,2015.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WELD COUNTY,COLORADO
ATTEST: 6'4Z1L V Cd r�J_; ! EXCUSED
CU1.G�W/ Kf� K Barbara Kirkmeyer,Chair
Weld County Clerk to the Board
Mike Freeman, Pro-Tern
BY: •
De. J, Clerk to the B•=rd - • •
Sean P.Conway
APPROV AS TO FOR . �y
-'Julie A.Cozad
t iii 1 a1¢
County Attorney % EXCUSED
Steve Moreno
Date of signature: ..,. ♦�r'�
2015-1493
CC, OEM; AC.cl- Vaz EM0016
BC0045
5; ;� Colorado Division of Homeland Security Grant NOI / Application
g 14
Emergency Management CDBG - DR Recover Colorado
Infrastructure Program
THIS SECTION FOR STATE USE ONLY
DHSEM Identification Number: Colorado Point of Contact:
CDBG-DR Program Manager
Date NO1 (Part A) Received: Colorado DHSEM
9195 East Mineral Avenue, Suite 200
Date Application (Part B) Received: Centennial, Colorado 80112
Office: 720.852.6713
Date Next Steps Letter Transmitted: Fax: 720.852.6750
cdps dhsem cdbg@state.co.us
I
PART A - NOI:
PROJECT OVERVIEW
1 . Applicant Legal Name: Weld County. Colorado
2. Applicant
Type: ✓ Local Government Private Non-Profit (Attach copy of 501c3, if applicable)
3. Project Title: (6) - County Match FEMA Projects - WELCO03 (643)
4. Proposed Project Total Cost: 590.298.26
CDBG-DR-I Request: 73. 787.28
5. Certifications:
The undersigned assures fulfillment of all requirements of the CDBG-DR Recover Colorado Infrastructure Program as
contained in the program guidelines and that all information contained herein is true and correct to the best of my
knowledge. The governing body of the applicant has duly authorized the document, commits to the non-Federal and State
share identified in the Budget, and hereby applies for the assistance documented in this application. Also, the applicant
understands that the project may proceed ONLY AFTER a GRANT AGREEEMENT is approved
Mike Freeman , Pro—Tem Weld County Commissioner (970) 356-4000
Typed Name of Authorized Applicant Agent flth' Telephone Number
MAY 272015
Signature ofAuthorized Applicant Agent Date Signed
2015- 1493
Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail aihmittal. Page 1 of 20
INS
CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
PART A - NOI: APPLICANT INFORMATION
1 . Applicant Legal Name: Weld County. Colorado
2. FIPS Code: 123 DUNS Number: 07575-7955
3. U.S. Congressional District: 4th Congressman Name:
4. State Senatorial District: 1 Senator Name: Mr. Cory Gardner
5. State Legislative District: 50 Representative Name: Mr, Ken Buck
6. Primary Point of'Contact:
The Primary Point of Contact is the person responsible for coordinating the implementation of this proposal, if approval is
granted.
Ms. ll Mr. 0 Mrs. . First Name: Roy Last Name: Rudisill
title: Director Organization: Weld County Office of Emergency Managemc
Street Address: 1 150 O Street
City: Greeley state: Colorado Zip Code: 80631
Telephone: ( i / u ) itat Fax: ( i / U )bbb- / 6 Mobile: (9 / U, 38 -U E-mail Address: rrudisil l(a�co.weld . co
7. Alternate Point of Contact:
The Alternate Point of Contact is the person that can address questions or concerns in the Primary Point of Contact's
absence.
\ k V Mr. Mis.JI First Name: Barb Last Name: Connolly
Title: Controller Organization: Weld County Accounting
Street Address: 1 150 O Street
City: Greeley State: Colorado Zip Code: 80631
Telephone: ( 5 / u )it3 I I . \: (J f upolo- ( 6 Mobile: E-mail Address: bconnolly(C�co .weld .
8. Application Prepared by:
Ms. III Mr. ✓ Mrs . First Name: Kyle Last Name: Jones
Title: Planner Organization: ARCADIS-US
Street Address:
City: Tallahass( State: FL Zip Code: 32309
Telephone: (bDU ) Ob I , x: Mobile: (22b) 202-3 E-mail Address: kyle. iones(aarcadis-
9. Authorized Applicant Agent:
Ms. 0 Mr. Mt s. . First Name: Barbara I .a t \um . Kirkmeyer
Title: COMMiSSii Organization: Weld County
Street Address: 1150 O Street, P . O . Box 758
City: Greeley State: Colorado Lip Code: 80631
Telephone: M U).5O6 I . v Mobile: E-mail Address: bkirkmeyer(c�co .welc
The Authorized Applicant Agent MUST be the chief executive officer, mayor, etc. This person must be able to sign
contracts, authorize funding allocations or payments, etc.
I
Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 2 of 20
4 I
CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
PART A - NOI: PROJECT DESCRIPTION & NATIONAL OBJECTIVES MET
1. Project — Eligible Activity Description:
Describe the proposed project. Explain how the proposed project will address recovery and/or resilience needs in your
community either independently or as part of a larger project. Include a description of the desired outcome and the
recovery objective(s) to be achieved. This narrative should describe the CDBG-DR Eligible Activity.
In an effort to achieve resiliency from the severe storms and minimize risk to the general
public, Weld County addressed severe damage to local roadways, bridges. culverts,
removed hazardous roadway debris, made emergency repairs to paved and gravel
roadways , addressed river embankments/dangerous conditions to the public and made
repairs to emergency response vehicles that were damaged during the Incident Period .
FEMA Categories A, B , C , and E were addressed in the Weld County FEMA Match . CDBG
funds are needed to be applied towards the Weld County FEMA Local Match for the
emergency work that was identified on previously submitted Project Worksheets . All
projects covered under the Weld County Project Worksheets were vital for Weld County to
clear hazardous debris from roadways/creeks/streams and enhance their infrastructure ,
river embankments, equipment and roadways . This particular NOI/Application will discuss
%MCI flnnQ /G4 '? \ The-. Drninr+ 1A /rn-lzninne-d- in rl++r.nknr1 nnr1 nnr,+nine rirdr, lIr,r1 r'r.r\rmr, r.f t.,r,rle Q
2. Site / Physical Location: Describe the area(s) affected/protected by this project, including location by complete street
address and longitude and latitude (coordinates in decimal degrees).
The latitude is 40 .409550 and longitude is - 104 .650180 . The attached spreadsheet shows
the Lat/Long coordinates for all of the Project Worksheets and depicts the damage site
locations as identified in the correlating Project Worksheets .
3. Population Served: Briefly describe the demographics of the population served or protected by this project. Include
the percent of the overall community population benefiting from this project. Explain your response.
An estimated 90% or more of the community benefited from the proactive work by Weld
County and the removal of hazardous debris and the emergency work/repairs made to the
roadways, bridges, equipment and culverts. The population benefiting from this Match
Project will include an LMI level population percentage that will be directly or indirectly
impacted through this project. This NOI and the associated PW impacted the entire County
and demographic area . White : 67 .6% , Hispanic: 28 . 3% , Other: 1 . 6% , Asian : 1 . 3% , Black :
0 .8% , Native American : 0 .4% . Weld County consists of 99, 317 households with a median
louse io c income o- S56 589 an -h majority o- W o un :v is own r-o cooler wi- i
4. Priority of this Project: If you are submitting more than one CDBG-DR Infrastructure NOI, what is the relative
priority of this project? Please indicate the priority as: Priority # of## Projects Submitted.
Priority 9 of 36 Projects Submitted .
Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 3 of 20
CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
PART A - NOI: CDBG-DR FUNDING QUALIFICATIONS
Community Development Block Grant — Disaster Recovery (CDBG-DR) funding can be approved for a project in which
ALL of the following requirements are met The physical location of the activity must be within a county listed in Table 1 of
the program Recover Colorado Infrastructure Grant Program Guidelines (Guidelines).
1. Connection to Disaster Recovery
CDBG's Disaster Recovery funds must be used for necessary expenses related to disaster relief, long-term recovery,
restoration of infrastructure and housing, economic revitalization, and mitigation from future damages.. The activity
must show a direct link to damages received during one or more of the events listed in Table 1 of the Guidelines. Please
provide a brief explanation of how the proposed acquisition activity: (1) was a result of the disaster event; (2) will
restore infrastructure or revitalize the economy; or will (3) mitigate future damages.
During the incident period of September 11 , 2013 to September 30 , 2013 , Weld County,
Colorado received heavy rainfall and debris in the creeks, streams and rivers which caused
surface gravel removal and scour damage to numerous roads and bridges in Weld County.
This NOI Application request addresses emergency work and the damages that were a
nnni •.n • 4- . . ..fir., 14. „ C
2. Compliance sr ith National Objectives
State recipients receiving allocations under the CDBG-DR program must certify that their projected use of funds
will ensure, and maintain evidence, that each of its activities assisted with CDBG-DR funds meets at least one of
the three National Objectives.
a) Which of the National Objectives are met by proposed project?
Will benefit low and moderate income (LMI) persons; or
Will aid in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight; or
V Is an Urgent Need in which meet community development needs having a particular urgency because
existing conditions pose a serious and immediate threat to the health or welfare of the community where
other financial resources are not available to meet such needs.
b) How will the proposed project meet the above checked National Objective(s).
See attached LMI data for the Project.
In addition to the LMI data attached , the State of Colorado (according to ACS
2008-2012 5Y ) lists Weld County at a 41 . 0% LMI . In reviewing the LMI data for this
Project NOI , the PW associated LMI % was 78 .21 % . However, this percentage does not
accurately capture the total number of service areas that are either directly or indirectly
impacted by the FEMA Match Projects . The entire community benefited from the
proactive emergency work by Weld County and the removal of hazardous debris and
the work/repairs made to the roadways , bridges, equipment and culverts thus the
County believes that a higher LMI % should be given for this FEMA match Projects .
The general vicinity of FEMA Match Projects encompasses the entire County and
greatly benefits the entire LMI population for this project, which is why the County
believes that this project not only meets, but exceeds the 50% requirement for meeting
the National Objective . The emergency work/repairs that were made under the WELCO
PW's for the Local FEMA Match drastically reduced hazardous conditions for the
general public and enabled Weld County to focus on resiliency efforts post storm . It is
believed that the service area for Project Site Locations benefited multiple LMI tract
sections and thus a higher weighted percentage of over 50% should be noted for this a
Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 4 of 20
CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
3. Compliance with the primary objective. As indicated in the Guidelines: "A proposed project's benefits to LMI
persons will be an important factor in evaluating potential infrastructure projects. A total of 20% of the Recover
Colorado Infrastructure project funding must benefit LMI persons. Due to the very low percentage of LMI projects
submitted in the first round of infrastructure funding, it is estimated that approximately 25% to 30% of the funding
available in this second allocation must meet the LMI requirement to make up for the deficit."
This section does not need to be completed if the project does not meet this National Objective.
The primary objective for using CDBG Disaster Recovery funds is benefitting, by at least 51 percent, persons of low and
moderate income. The following section provides the information necessary to complete this requirement.
a) Is the proposed activity: jurisdiction wide in specified target area
If you checked specified target area, which data source was used? (Note: select the smallest unit of Census data that
encompasses your proposed target area.)
b) Enter the number of households involved in the proposed project. 99, 317
c) In the space below, describe how the applicant will comply with the requirement that at least 51 percent of CDBG-DR
dollars will principally benefit low- and moderate-income households and persons.
Weld County will comply with the 51 % requirement due to the fact that the PW
associated under this NOI Project for the FEMA County Match is targeted to areas of the
county that qualify as LMI . The justification behind this methodology is that multiple
d) Enter the number of households within each income category expected to benefit from the proposed project.
Incomes above 80% of the County Median 785
Incomes above 50% and up to 80% of the County Median 1265
Incomes at or below 50% of the County Median 2060
e) Which type of income was used to determine the above? (Check only one)
As determined by the American Community Survey (Public Facilities projects)
Annual income as defined for Public Housing and Section 8
Annual income as reported under the Census long form
Adjusted gross income as defined for reporting under IRS
Attach am continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 5 of 20
CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
PART A - NOI: COMPREHENSIVE RISK ANALYSIS INFORMATION
1. Community Hazards Review: Please list and briefly describe in rank order of importance the natural or man-made
hazards in your (the Applicant's) service area.
The hazards identified within this Project for the FEMA County Match for WELCO03 (643 )
would be ranked in the following manner: Flood , Erosion and Subsidence .
The hazards caused significant damage and posed a severe risk to the community for the
designated incident period .
2. High Risk Hazards Addressed by the Project:
Describe how, and the degree to which, the proposed project mitigates high risk hazards. Include damage history, source
and type of problem, frequency of event(s), and severity of damage information, if available.
Hazard 1
Flooding caused the most severe damage to Weld County during the designated incident
period and this Project addressed and mitigated against severe flood damage to local
roadways, bridges, culverts, removed hazardous debris along roadways . In addition ,
County Officials ensured repairs were made to paved and gravel roadways for the safety of
the community and addressed river embankments/dangerous conditions to the public and
made repairs to emergency response vehicles that were damaged during the Incident
Period . The repairs made brought the damaged infrastructure back to its pre-disaster
condition in accordance with regulations .
hazard 2
Erosion also caused a severe issue for the County. This Project addressed and mitigated
against severe erosion damage to local roadways, shoulders , and embankments . The work
that was conducted by the County mitigated against any immediate threat/hazard to the
damaged infrastructure and restored the infrastructure back to its pre-disaster condition in
accordance with regulations.
Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 6 of 20
CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
Hazard 3
Subsidence was another critical hazard that caused dangerous conditions for the
community. This Project addressed and mitigated against severe subsidence damage to
local roadways, shoulders , bridges and embankments . The work that was conducted by the
County mitigated against any immediate threat/hazard to the damaged infrastructure and
restored the infrastructure back to its pre-disaster condition in accordance with regulations .
Note: If your proposed project addresses more than three Hazards, please provide that information as an
attachment.
3. Elimination of Risk: Does the proposed project result in the elimination of a hazard from your (the Applicant's) service
area? If so, please describe. If not, please estimate the degree to which this project will mitigate the risk from the hazards
identified in Item #2.
The Proposed FEMA Local Match for WELCO03 (643 ) does not completely eliminate the
hazards identified from the service area . The Proposed FEMA Match Project does allow
Weld County to receive a percentage of funds back that the County expended during one of
the most costly disasters in Colorado history however. These types of hazards that
occurred in Weld County and throughout Colorado are truly an act of mother nature and the
County was as prepared as it could have been but the severity/duration of the incident was
of an unprecedented nature . Weld County cannot eliminate the risk of future flooding ,
erosion or land subsidence, but Local Officials can ensure that their community is prepared
for future incident, take the necessary precautions and that their infrastructure is restored
4. Environmental Quality Improvements: Does the proposed project result in an improvement in the quality of the natural
environment in your (the Applicant's) service area? If so, please describe.
Yes; the damages that attributed to the designated incident period and FEMA-DR 4145
were addressed via the previously submitted PW and the work conducted to restore the
infrastructure back to its pre-disaster condition was implemented . The work done at this
site location (see previous attachment for lat/long coordinates ) addressed not only
improvements/repairs made to the infrastructure , but also improvements and repairs to the
river embankments and any potential erosion or subsidence issues that could have
tAlnrrnnnrl if +h,, ('ni infti hnrl nn+ 4c1i-nn fhn nrnnrfitir, mr»ci arnc fin thnti dirt
5. Climate Change Improvements: Does the proposed project reduce or ameliorate a projected impact of climate change
in Colorado? If so, please briefly describe the benefit of the project.
This Proposed Project reduces a projected impact climate change due to the proactive
mitigation measures that were undertaken by Weld County during the designated incident
period . This was accomplished by ensuring that the damaged site location was addressed
as soon , but as safely, as possible , and not to sustain any further impacts to the site
locations or environment that would enable the damage to enhance the projected impact of
any potential climate changes.
Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and a-mail submittal. Page 7 of 20
e
CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
6. Community Process: Does the proposed project include a community planning or involvement process that increases
community resiliency? If so, please briefly describe the process.
This Proposed Project was initiated by County Officials in an effort to achieve resiliency
from the severe storms and also to minimize risk to the community, Weld County addressed
the severe flood damage to the roadways and infrastructure by ensuring that dangerous
conditions for the public were addressed and mitigated properly and efficiently.
7. Reduction in the Costs of Future Response or Recovery: Will the proposed project result in a reduction in the cost
of response or recovery from an incident occurring due to one or more of the hazards identified in Item # 1 or #2? If so,
please briefly describe how response or recovery costs will be reduced.
For a small scale flooding incident, yes; however, the flooding that occurred during the
designated incident period was catastrophic and the PW associated with the NOI FEMA
Local Match Request were completed to address the damages .
8. Floodplain/Floodway/Substantially Damaged Properties: Does the proposed project include a property or
properties located in a floodway or floodplain; or not located in a regulatory floodplain but which were substantially
damaged or have a history of damage from at least two disaster events? If so, please identify those properties below.
No; the Proposed Project is for the FEMA Local Match for WELCO03 (643 ) from CDBG-DR
in regards to expenses from CAT C Damage Categories for the designated incident period
for FEMA-DR 4145 .
9. Mitigation Planning:
Does your community have a current FEMA approved multi-hazard mitigation plan? l es No
Location of proposed project in mitigation plan strategies: Page 139 Section/Part Mitigation Stra
Is the community a member of good standing with the National Flood Insurance Program? es No
Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and a-mail submittal. Page R of 20
a
CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
10. Community Plan Compliance: Does the proposed project comply with and/or address an issue recognized in key
community plans? Key plans include, but are not limited to: a Comprehensive Master Plan, a Stormwater Management Plan,
a Hazard Mitigation Plans, or key community codes. If so, please describe how the project integrates into the plan(s).
Yes; the Proposed Project complies with all local community plans and this Project
integrates into the Plans because the County addressed the damages to local roadways
and infrastructure and mitigated damages that posed a serious risk/hazard to the
community during the incident period . This FEMA PW was initiated by Weld County and via
this Proposed Project, the County requests that CDBG funds be applied towards the local
FEMA Match for this Project.
11. Environmental / Historic Preservation Issues: Please describe any significant environmental, historic, or cultural features
that may be affected by the project. Please also describe any features that may be improved by the project.
All environmental issues are addressed on the attached Project Worksheet as supporting
documentation . The significant EHP issues were in regards to the Endangered Species Act
( ESA) and EHP Standard Conditions . All items were addressed and any additional
supporting backup documentation can be provided upon request.
I
12. Permitting: Please list the local, state, and federal permits that will be required to complete this project.
All permitting was addressed on the attached Project Worksheet as supporting
documentation . The significant permitting issues were in regards to the Endangered
Species Act ( ESA) and EHP Standard Conditions . All items were addressed and any
additional supporting backup documentation can be provided upon request . Please see
below for environmental permits that were obtained .
Floodplain Permit
Ann O
Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 9 of 24)
CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
13. Community Resilience: Please describe how this project will increase the resilience of your community. As defined in the
Guidelines: "Resilience incorporates hazard mitigation and land use planning strategies; critical infrastructure, environmental
and cultural resource protection; and sustainability practices to reconstruct the built environment, and revitalize the economic,
social, and natural environments."
In an effort to achieve resiliency from the severe storms and minimize risk to the general
public, Weld County addressed severe damage to local roadways , bridges, culverts,
removed hazardous debris roadways , made repairs to paved and gravel roadways ,
addressed river embankments/dangerous conditions to the public and made repairs to
emergency response vehicles that were damaged during the Incident Period .
This Proposed Project addresses proactive work initiated by Weld County during FEMA-DR
4145 enabled the community to recover in an expeditious manner and increased the
resilience of the community by incorporating nearly every aspect of sustainability and
revitalizing the community. The community was able to recover quicker due to the proactive
work done through this Proposed Project and the associated PW's .
14. Maps
Please attach the following maps with the project site and structures marked on the map. Use SAME ID number as in
the Individual Property Worksheets.
Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM). If the FIRM for your area is not published, please attach a copy of the Flood
_ Hazard Boundary Map (FHBM).
City or county scale map (large enough to show the entire project area)
USGS 1 :24,000 topo map
Parcel Map (Tax Map, Property Identification Map, etc.)
J
Overview photographs. The photographs should be representative of the project area, including any relevant
streams, creeks, rivers, etc., and drainage areas which affect the project site of will be affected by the project.
15. Additional Comments (Optional): Enter any additional comments related to the proposed project's ability to reduce
hazard risk and increase community resiliency.
This proposed project reduced the hazard risk to the community and increased resiliency by
the work conducted through the PW in correlation with FEMA-DR 4145 . CDBG funds are
being requested to be applied to the local FEMA Match ( 12 . 5% ) for the PW.
All maps are located in project files that were previously submitted and will be provided
upon request.
The entire community benefited from the nrnartive work by Weld County and the removal Ca
Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 10 of 20
CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
PART A - NOI: DECISION MAKING PROCESS
1. Decision-Making Process:
Describe the process you used to decide that this project is the best solution to the problem. Explain why this project is
the best alternative you considered. Address questions such as:
• Are you focusing on the area in your community that has the greatest potential for losses?
• Have you considered the risks to critical facilities and structures and benefits to be obtained by mitigating this
vulnerability?
• Have you considered those areas or projects that present the greatest opportunities given the current situation(s)
of interest in your community?
• Are you addressing a symptom or the source of the problem? Addressing the source of the problem is a long-term
solution which provides the most mitigation benefits.
• If impacts to the environment, natural, cultural or historic resources have been identified, explain how your alternatives
and proposed project address, minimize, or avoid these impacts.
The Site locations within this WELCO PW in the Proposed Project were identified due to
the high dollar amount of funds that were expended by Weld County to ensure the safety of
the community and also restore county infrastructure back to its pre-disaster condition . This
Proposed Project has site locations across the entire community and service area and it
was determined that a large percentage of the LMI population was impacted by the severe
flooding incident and the proactive work by County Officials enabled the community to
recover quicker, thus allowing the community to sustain resiliency and return operations to
normal .
W
2. Acquisition Projects - Describe the community's methodology for selecting the properties to be acquired in this application
and how each is ranked (highest to lowest):
N/A
attach an) continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 11 of 20
CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
PART A - NOI : SCOPE OF WORK / BUDGET OVERVIEW / FINANICAL FACTORS
1. Project Scope: Please provide a comprehensive and detailed description of the scope of the proposed project.
Describe each of the project components and the steps necessary to complete that work. If the proposed project is a
funding match for another disaster recovery or infrastructure development program, please identify the
agency, program funds, and project reference number that CDBG-DR funding is intended to support. Also
describe any critical deadlines that must be met to accomplish this work.
This Proposed Project is for the Local FEMA Match for costs for WELCO03 (643 ) . These
costs were incurred as a result of FEMA-DR 4145 . During the incident period of September
11 , 2013 to September 30 , 2013, Weld County, Colorado received heavy rainfall and debris
in the creeks , streams and rivers which caused severe flooding to and along roadways and
surface streets , and also severely damaged local infrastructure . This NOI Application
request addresses the emergency work / damages that were a direct result of the severe
flooding .
A Scope of Work is included within the PW and addresses the work that was completed .
2. Community Priority: Please describe why this project is a priority for your organization.
This Proposed Project is a priority for Weld County to utilize the CDBG funding as the Local
FEMA Match to offset the costs for the proactive work done by the County to reduce
hazardous conditions to the community .
Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 12 of 20
-----
CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
3. Project Cost Summary: Please summarize the major cost components of the project. Please round all values to the
nearest dollar.
a. Planning / Engineering / Design $
b. Environmental Compliance $ The value of general and/or
c. Real Property Acquisition / Demolition $ professional labor wages must
be tabulated in accordance
d. Closing Costs / Legal Fees $ with the Davis Bacon Act of
e. Housing Program Assistance $ 1931
f. Construction Costs $
g. Project Delivery Costs $
h. Other (specify below) $ 590.298.26
See Protect Worksheet Cost (attached ) i. Total of a-h $ 590.298.26
J . Duplication of Benefits (if unknown at time of application enter zero). $ 0.00
k. Subtract j. from i. to determine Total Project Cost $ 590.298.26
Notes: Housing Program Assistance costs include the cost of compliance with Uniform Relocation Assistance (URA) and
Comparable Housing Assistance (CHA) requirements. Project Delivery Costs include the costs of project delivery by the
sponsoring organization but do not include administrative overhead.
4. Total Project Cost Allocations
Proposed Project Total Cost: $ 590.298.26
Federal Cost Share: $ 442.723.69
State Cost Share: $ 73,787.28
$ 73.787.28
Local Cost Share
5. Basis of Cost Estimate: Briefly describe how the cost estimates listed in #3 above were developed (e.g. lump sum, unit cost,
quotation, etc.).
The Cost Estimates were developed above from actual work that was properly procured
and conducted . They come directly off of what was included on the FEMA approved PW
and the costs are broken down by type of work and site .
6. Project Management: Describe how you will manage the costs and schedule, and how you will ensure successful
performance.
The work for this Proposed Project has been completed or is pending completion . The
12 . 5% CDBG Local Match will be applied towards the Weld County Match for FEMA PW's
and the costs that were previously incurred during the disaster.
Note: The applicant must agree to furnish quarterly reports during the entire time the project is in active status. Quarters end
on March 31st, June 30th, September 30th, and December 31st. Reports are due to the State within 15 days after the end of
each quarter.)
Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 13 of 20
CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
7. Project Maintenance Requirements: The following questions are to give assurance on the project's maintenance over
its useful life. Please answer each question and give a brief explanation.
a. If the project involves the acquisition of real property, what is the proposed land use after acquisition? (i.e., Agriculture,
Recreation, Vacant Land, Park, Wetlands, etc.)
N/A
b. Will the project require periodic maintenance?
No
c. I f yes, who will provide the maintenance?
N/A
d. What is the estimated cost of maintenance on an annual basis?
0
Note: Cost of maintenance is considered an application prioritization weighting factor. Projects with high maintenance
costs have a greater risk of future failure due to deferred maintenance. Therefore, the responses provided above should be
as complete and verifiable as possible in order to minimize the likelihood of ranking point reductions due to maintenance
concerns.
8. Additional Comments: Enter any additional comments related to the proposed project's funding, if desired .
CDBG funds are needed for the 12 . 5% Local FE1V1A Match and the associated PW that is
included in the NOI-Application .
9. Financial / Fiscal Health Factors: Please indicate the total budget (all funds) of your organization. Please describe the
impact of disaster recovery efforts to date on this budget. In addition, if this objective is selected based on the local
governments inability to finance the activity, the municipality must also include in the application package a resolution stating
this fact and supporting documentation such as budgetary information, a description of TABOR restrictions, and the most
recent audit report or approved exemption from audit.
Weld County's total 2015 budget is $307 ,031 , 089 . The impact of the September, 2013
flooding has primary been on the damage to the county's road and bridge system . The
damage has resulted in Weld County having to transfer $5 million from the Contingency
Fund to the Public Works Fund in 2013 and in 2014 for a total of $ 10 million dollars . Without
assistance from FEMA, FWHA, and CDBG the amount would have several million more .
The impact has also forced the county to shift local resources from projects unrelated to
flooding to deal with the emergency situations created by the flood in both the 2013 and
2014 fiscal years . Even in 2015 the county is still using local resources to recover from the
flooding . Fortunately, Weld County has always been fiscally conservative and budgeted
responsibly . Had the county not taken the responsible approach to its finances county
service would have had to have been cut to cope with the flood recovery.
IA/o r cni in-ur nnorr-oc i inr or t no mnc- roc-rir-i ,nsrnnor�, -r+v imi-r+tinn in tho - Rocir o�
\ttach and continuation, or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 14 of 20
CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
PART B - APPLICATION : PROJECT MILESTONES / TIMELINES / TASKS
1. Timeline / Tasks
Insert the proposed work schedule as tasks to accomplish the overall goal of the proposed activity (i.e., appraisals, title
search, closing, etc.), and provide a description of the task's purpose. This timeline will be used as a measurement tool
for progress in the project's implementation and is included in the required Quarterly Reports. Also, FEMA uses the
timeline for determining the approved period of performance. It will be the basis used to justify delays or extensions, if
necessary, and should be estimated carefully. The first and last entries are state requirements and have already been
entered.
Task 1 :
Grant Process and Environmental Review Timeframe: 3 Months
Task 2: Emergency Repairs- The initial emergency repairs were made directly 1Completed
g Y p 9 Y p Y Timeframe:
Task 3: Permanent Repairs - Becuase the emergency repairs were quick repair Completed
Timeframe:
Task 4: Additional Permanent Repairs - All the necessary repairs were not com 6 Months
Timelrame:
Task 5:
f imeframc:
Task 6:
Timeframe:
Task 7: Time frame:
Task 8:
Timeframe:
Task 9:
Timeframe:
Final Inspection Report and Project Closeout
Task I U:
The Final Inspection Report is a review of the activity's paper documentation,
showing the project was implemented as required. Once the review is completed. the 3 Months
report and findings will be provided to the grantee for review and concurrence. The Timeframe:
State submits the concurrence to FEMA as part of a closeout package to formally
Total Project 'l'imefrarne: 12 Months
Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 15 of 20
CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
2. Start Date & Pre-Award Costs: The start date for any project begins upon GRANT AGREEMENT approval by the
State Controller. If a different start date or timeframe is needed, provide an explanation below. Also indicate if any pre-
award activities or costs have been incurred or authorized.
The proposed project is for local FEMA match dollars and the majority of the work is
completed ; however, another round of construction will be performed this summer. The
repairs for this site began as soon as the flood waters receded and the county crews were
able to access the site . The initial phase of repairs were emergency in nature and began in
September of 2013 and concluded during November of that same year. Permanent repairs
for this site commenced the following year at the beginning of construction season and
concluded in October of 2014 because of weather constraints . The final repairs will be
completed in October of 2015 . Additionally, cost have been incurred through the preparation
of this NOI Application .
Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 16 of 20
CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
Please note that Part B is required for the final Application submittal. Part B sections
may optionally be completed and submitted with the NOI. Please update any Part A
section information when submitting you full Application.
PART B — APPLICATION : ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
1. Environmental Review Background Information & Environmental Review Worksheet:
In accordance with 24 CFR Part 58.22 (see below), all federally funded projects must accomplish an environmental review
prior to beginning any work on a project. These HUD regulations are in place for two purposes:
1 . To ensure federal funds are used to place people of low and moderate income in environmentally safe
conditions; and
2. To ensure federal funds are NOT used to negatively impact environmental conditions that exist near a
project site.
Please note the following limitations on CDBG-DR grant activities pending environmental clearance per 24 CFR Part 58.22.
(a) Neither a recipient nor any participant in the development process, including public or private nonprofit or for-profit
entities, or any of their contractors, may commit HUD assistance under a program listed in Sec. 58. 1(b) on an activity or
project until HUD or the state has approved the recipient's RROF and the related certification from the responsible
entity. In addition, until the RROF and the related certification have been approved, neither a recipient nor any
participant in the development process may commit non-HUD funds on or undertake an activity or project under a
program listed in Sec. 58. 1(b) if the activity or project would have an adverse environmental impact or limit the choice
of reasonable alternatives.
(b) N/A for DOLA/CDPS projects.
(c) If a recipient is considering an application from a prospective sub-recipient or beneficiary and is aware that the
prospective sub-recipient or beneficiary is about to take an action within the jurisdiction of the recipient that is
prohibited by paragraph (a) of this section, then the recipient will take appropriate action to ensure that the objectives
and procedures of NEPA are achieved.
(d) An option agreement on a proposed site or property is allowable prior to the completion of the environmental review
if the option agreement is subject to a determination by the recipient on the desirability of the property for the project as
a result of the completion of the environmental review in accordance with this part and the cost of the option is a
nominal portion of the purchase price. There is no constraint on the purchase of an option by third parties that have not
been selected for HUD funding, have no responsibility for the environmental review and have no say in the approval or
disapproval of the project.
(e) Self-Help Homeownership Opportunity Program (SHOP). In accordance with section 11(d)(2)(A) of the Housing
Opportunity Program Extension Act of 1996 (42 U.S.C. 12805 note), an organization, consortium, or affiliate receiving
assistance under the SHOP program may advance non-grant funds to acquire land prior to completion of an
environmental review and approval of a Request for Release of Funds (RROF) and certification, notwithstanding
paragraph (a) of this section. Any advances to acquire land prior to approval of the RROF and certification are made at
the risk of the organization, consortium, or affiliate and reimbursement for such advances may depend on the result of
the environmental review. This authorization is limited to the SHOP program only and all other forms of HUD
assistance are subject to the limitations in paragraph (a) of this section.
(0 Relocation. Funds may be committed for relocation assistance before the approval of the RROF and related
certification for the project provided that the relocation assistance is required by 24 CFR part 42.
Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 17 of 20
CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
Environmental Review Worksheet
Check ALL of the activities listed below that will be included as part of the project,
REGARDLESS OF THE FUNDING SOURCE:
Q Information and financial services
O Administrative and management activities
Ig Environmental and other studies, resource identification, and the development of plans and strategies
D Most engineering and design costs associated with eligible projects
ra ■ Inspections and testing of properties for hazards or defects
ti ■ Project planning
O Purchase of insurance
> n Purchase of tools
Wy ❑ Technical assistance and training
yC :.c .F. ❑ Interim assistance to arrest the effects of an imminent threat or physical deterioration in which the assistance
t� 0 does not alter environmental conditions.
`~' p Public services that will not have a physical impact or result in any physical changes (e.g., employment, child
.0 care, health, education, counseling, welfare)
51 Assistance for temporary or permanent improvements that do not alter environmental conditions and are limited
to protection, repair, or restoration activities necessary only to control or arrest the effects from disasters or
imminent threats to public safety including those resulting from physical deterioration
(Must also complete the Regulatory Checklist at the end of Exhibit IV-A)
m
ct) ≥ p Operating costs (e.g., maintenance, security, operation, utilities, furnishings, equipment, supplies, staff training
Z = and recruitment, other incidental costs)
rr r
❑ Relocation costs
BI Acquisition, repair, improvement, reconstruction, or rehabilitation when the facilities and improvements are in
place and will be retained in the same use without change in size or capacity of more than 20 percent
❑ Special projects directed to the removal of material and architectural barriers that restrict the mobility of and
y accessibility to elderly and handicapped persons
I Acquisition (including leasing) or disposition of, or equity loans on, an existing structure
Acquisition (including leasing) of vacant land provided the structure or land acquired, financed, or disposed of
❑ q q � P
will be retained for the same use
Acquisition, repair, improvement, reconstruction, or rehabilitation when the facilities and improvements are in
place, but will change in size or capacity of more than 20 percent
> ❑ Acquisition, repair, improvement, reconstruction, or rehabilitation when the facilities and improvements are in
,.Qra place, but will involve a change in land use, such as from non-residential to residential, commercial to
industrial, or from one industrial use to another
51 Demolition
Fl New construction
This checklist must be included with the CDBG application.
Please direct questions to the appropriate contact person below:
DOLA/DLG DHSEM
Steven Boand, State Disaster Recovery Manager
Tamra Norton, Environmental Compliance Officer Department of Public Safety
Department of Local Affairs Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
1313 Sherman Street, Room 521, 9195 E Mineral Ave, Suite 200
Denver, CO 80203 Centennial, CO 80112
303-866-6398 720.852.6713
tamra.nortonstate.co.us
steven.boand@state.co.us
DPS/DOLA USE ONLY:
Required level of environmental review: O Exempt O CENST O CESTO EA
Reviewed by:
Date of Review:
Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 18 of 20
CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
2. Supplemental Environmental Review Information
Enter any additional comments related to environmental concerns for the proposed project if desired. Please list and attach any
documents or studies that have been prepared that support the Environmental Review Worksheet responses.
All environmental issues are addressed on the attached Project Worksheet as supporting
documentation . The significant EHP issues were in regards to the Endangered Species Act
( ESA) and EHP Standard Conditions. All items were addressed and any additional supporting
backup documentation can be provided upon request . Please see below for environmental
permits that were obtained .
Floodplain Permit
404 Nationwide Permit
Migratory Birds Permit (if needed )
Threatened and Endangered Species Permit
Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 19 of 20
CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
PART B - APPLICATION : DETAILED PROJECT BUDGET
1. Detailed Project Budget: Please enter or attach a detailed and comprehensive final proposed budget for the project.
Please note that CDBG-DR funds may be limited to the amount submitted with the NOI pending the availability of
additional funding
This Proposed Project is for the Local FEMA Match for costs for WELCO03 (643 ) . These
costs were incurred as a result of FEMA-DR 4145 . During the incident period of September
11 , 2013 to September 30 , 2013 , Weld County, Colorado received heavy rainfall and debris in
the creeks , streams and rivers which caused severe flooding to and along roadways and
surface streets , and also severely damaged local infrastructure . This Application request
addresses the emergency work / damages that were a direct result of the severe flooding .
A Scope of Work and detailed project budget is included within the PW and addresses the
work that was completed . It is important to note that a version request has been submitted to
the State and the attached Project Worksheet may not represent FINAL cost.
Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and c-mail submittal. Page 20 of 20
WI
E
0
U
C
ete
V
E
3
-D
aJ
E
0
C
03
m
al
v
C 0
C Co
O O
N
a6_ ,
c
a O 0
en Cl N
Cu
c E m m
0 0 E a
u
c E
n E 2
y J OD U
C
E o y
m
C E o
0 0
0 m C 2 -0
,n N A N ?) O
v n ;.1 c O
E
a -0 ' co4) J a
E 0 0
o n 0
o O w 2
C l0 C E LI-.
3 3 3 -5 4: 3
0 O 0 - o m
A m
0 0 0 in c c c
c c c a E
J J 1- O
0 al al ele
Ci
U U U a n a
Z
0 0 O
v 0 0
0 0 2 o '
o
J J J J J
ae oe o o e o ce o oe o 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 c o o e o 0 oe a * * o * o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LO eD lD tD ea O IN N O O O tO lD 1D Of U3 O re O Cr Q lD n CO N .-I Q a CO Q CO n n N O 01 O
I-- Q N e-+ el e-1 e1 —1 Q N N n n czt .--1 ✓1 re N Ni N. In L!1 el e1 ea N co ✓1 ✓1 el a Q .y a ✓1 a
a 01 CO 00 CO CO CO 01 N N n n 01 0o CO 00 O CO CO 00 n N N 00 O to N M N n V1 N LJl Ln ✓1 COOO 01 COOO 01 Do N en en en en M M 00 ✓1 1n m en CO en M M M M a N m M M N V N N N N N Q CO M 03 to
O
O
2
O
J
✓1 Ln 1/1 ✓1 Lel UI ✓1 in O O ✓1 M ✓1 ✓1 ✓1 ✓1 O ✓1 O ✓1 en In 1J1 ✓1 0 0 0 0 ✓1 ✓t O ✓1 0 0 0 ✓1 ✓I Ln ✓1 O
1n 01 el et el I--I .-e LA CO 00 N N ✓1 e e .-I .-I Ln e-1 N Q1 N ✓1 ✓1 e-1 01 LD 00 N Ln Ln 1D ✓1 LO 1D LD N 1n O m 00
> n 00 m m m m m N m Of ti ti N m m m to M N CO re o 0 M N N Ql a O 0 N o n o o N N N N 01
M m eel rum ti ti N N M M on N en N N N m .-1 N .-I N IN N N N .-e el --I
z
O
O
2
0
J
✓1 Ln 0 0 0 0 0 1n en In O O U7 0 o CJ 0 O en 1n 0 0 0 O ✓1 O U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 efi in J1 ✓1 1n
m tO if) U3 1D 10 1D m O O O O M 1D e.0 fO O lD 10 O O ✓1 ✓1 1D O m O 0 1n 1/1 en Ln m e-1 r+ Q m O M O
N N O O O O O N Q Q a a N 0 0 0 M o 'Cr n Q tO tO O el O Cr N LC 1D O 10 O a a 0 N CO N Q
N N N N N .-I .-I .--1 .-d N N N .-1 IN .--I Neel--I .r .-I .-1 ey
J
1n o Ill 1n 1/1 1n v1 1n ✓1 1n o 0 1n 1n 1n 1n o 1n 1n O o ✓1 ✓1 1n o 1n 1n o 1n 1n 1n 1n ✓1 0 0 in 1n 1n ✓1 ✓1
a N 0 tD co 10 10 tO N m m N N N 10 10 ID CO to N 0 N m Ln tD a a1 m 0 ✓1 1n 01 1n O1 N N Ln N t0 n m
otD N N N N N N 10 0 O 00 00 La N N N N N Ie1 N 00 .1 e-I N 1n tO 0 --I e-1 e+ 1D .-1 1D N N CO 1D a 1/40 O
re - .-1 el e1 e1 .-1 .ti e1 e. .1 eH
2
a
J
1n ✓1 m ✓1 ✓1 ✓1 1/1 In 0 0 Ln ✓1 ✓1 ✓1 ✓1 Ln 1/1 ✓1 O ✓1 ✓1 ✓1 ✓1 ✓1 O 1/1 0 0 Ul 1n ✓) Ln u1 0 0 0 ✓1 0 1/1 0
✓1 r-1 00 CO CO co 00 1n to ✓1 <n 1n ✓1 co co pO 01 co 03 el 1n N N co CO CO ✓1 N N 00 N C O O1 O1 N Ln O In Ln
L.1
U1 M N N N N N Ln 1D lD ID LO Ln N N N a m ID N M N (.0 N rJ N 1n Ln tD
J
ti N cI .--I .-I 1-1 .-I N ee eH N N .-4 .-1 .--I .-1 N cI c. N N .-1 e-I N M N e1 r-I .-. .1 N .-I N e r-I cI e-I .-1 .--I .-1
O Ln el .-1 e-1 --I -. O Cl O el .-I 0 eel el -1 N el Ln ✓1 ti 0 0 el N M O tD O O In O m CO 00 0 0 01 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e1 r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _ o .-I
10 N 1n ✓1 ✓1 ✓1 en O 0 0 ✓1 Ln tD 1n en en ✓1 ✓1 N N LI1 CO OO VI e1 e1 0 0 CO CO -I 00 .-I 01 ml lD LO O to O
0 O N N N N n 0 N N N N O Ni N Ni N N O O N el —I N N N N N --I e1 N ti N .--I re re 0 N 0 N
000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000
M M M M m M M m m m M M M m m m m m m m M m m M M M m M M M M M M m m m M m m M
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N IN N N N N N N IN N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
O .--I --I .-I .-1 —I .-1 a ey .-1 el .-1 .-1 .-1 —1 .ti --1 .-I .-I —I el .-I .-I . . . . . .a el .-I el el ,--I el el el .-1 H el --I
Y OO co m 00 CO CO 00 00 CO CD 00 00 CO 00 00 00 00 00 CO 00 00 03 00 00 00 CO c0 00 00 CO CO 03 OO CO co 00 00 CO CO O
,j0000000000000000000000000000000000000000
0 In VI N in VI Ln in 1n VI ✓1 V1 V1 V1 ✓1 V1 V1 VI V1 V1 ✓1 V1 N ✓1 V1 vl V1 V1 111 N V1 in in in N N ✓1 V1 N ✓1 in
0 0 0 .7 O O 0 0 0 O O 0 O O 0 0 0 O 0 O O O 0 0 O O O O O 0 O O 0 O O
m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C) 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7000000000C3000 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000000000000000000000o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
en 000000000000000000000000000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
C O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 o O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 coo 0
OJ m m ✓I ✓I en In 1J1 en 1n in en 1n ✓I ✓I 1n V1 en ✓I to to ✓1 ✓I ✓I N V1 V1 ✓1 1n In ✓1 ✓I V1 Ln to LP Ln Ln ✓1 ✓1 ✓1
v e l e1 e-1 el -I el e l .-I .-1 e l -1 e l --I e1 e l --1 -I N --I el e1 e� .--I -1 -I e-I a-i el ei ey e l el el e1 v-I ei e1 el el -I
.-1 -1 et (NI M Q ✓1 -I ri --I el ,-I .--I N m .--I N --1 0-4 ea er c J el ,- N m Q et N M Cr el .-1 el --1 el el el -1
C
0
4-
II
u
O
J
ei M -7 7 K Q T in if) N CO 01 0 re - -1 .N N 1n Ln 10 CO Co Q1 .-1 .-I ti el en en m en Q e+ rn a Ln O N co
2j ^'l .-I el - I .'-I -1 -'I -I -I ^l -1 el N rJ N N N N N r-4 N m m M m m m m
a
>4.
c a a a a < < < < 4 < 4 < 4 < 4 < 4 < 4 < 44 < 4 < 4 < 44 < 4 < 44 < 4 < 44 <
v 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 LU 2 2 LU 2 2 2 2 LU LU LU 2 LU 2 2 2 2 2 2 LU 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
m W LL W W W UJ UJ W lL W eu Lei W W W U- LL Lu Ul LL U- LL LLJ CU CU Lei W U- lL L.L. W UJ U- UJ LU W 11J UJ W U1
Q LL U. 1J_ LL LL LL LI- LL U- LL LL LL LL LL LL U- LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL Le- LL Li_ LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL
0o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O o 0 0 O O N 0 0 00 a
co ire a 01 N N 01 M N en N NJ a M 0 el ✓1 N en M N ✓1 el m 1.0 et LD 0 m Q1 m O 01 D1 CO Q1 a Ln 03 e+
.-I 111 .-1 N a a 1n M CO tO Q a 1n in N Vl LO en 0 00 00 O1 0) .-I 0 N Q N r4 e-I 01 Ln n N Ln N e-I 1D
0J e-1 Ql m N 01 01 00 10 00 00 M en W N Q M N m 00 0 M M N N 00 en Q1 tO N 10 03 N -1 Q CO e-+ to in el Cr
✓1 O e-1 ei O O O Q m M CO CO a CO CO CO a Cr 0 .--1 CO M M O N 01 O e-I Ln Ln an m al 01 N O 'Cr N Vl 01
a Q en M fn In M a -I re IN N a M M en en In Q a N N N M fn IV re O N !V N N IV 0 0 a a - a o
000660006060060aO
to Q a Q Q a a a a a Q a a a a a a Q a Q a Q a a a a a a - a n a a a a a a a a a a
J
Q e
O O O O O O O O o O O 0 O O O o O O O O O o O O O o o o o o o o o o o o o Q
03 00 0 1n 0 0 Dl ID 00 M 01 01 N N 1n N M 1D CO 01 Of N 0 N r1 0 ✓1 N M 1n ✓1 N a Q M 01 N a co to
CO i 00 00 CI 01 N Cr a a 1n m 0100 CO 00 O CO 00 N s0 O CO N 01 01 CO N ✓) M IV N 00 tO N
1D 01 O OO N
e N O a Cr Cr a Q ey 0 0 -1 .-I --I 00 00 CO 1n M M0 e-1 03 ei a 01 N ID Cr T Q1 O 00 to co t0 cn ey 01 N
L O to a a Q Q Q O O N O O O 00 c0 00 e-I -I .-I N O 01 T a 00 el M O N K CO N M Q 00 l0 O N O1 Le)
LD LD N N N N N N O O 00 CO N Q Q Cr Cr a 413 10 00 OO CO N 0O O O 01 00 00 00 CO O 00 CO Ln N Q1 1D O
!' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lc,* ✓1 a a 0 Q 0 C 0 a 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 Ln 0 a' 0 0 0 ✓1 0 0 0 0 0 et ✓1
m o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o C o 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
-• -• --) e� e•♦ e•
0 ,
J
a • �.`� a
. t_ = ,
Ly
" 0 'I I .t • .i} '
,,. . .ter►..
.x 3 as m� -! ! x .: •
a itr l IC�" W •
W W W '�` ir
. i
y ti.
u.w , LL li
all
k
tr.. a a ' • Atria
•
r.
urn it
ell A<
2 T . ,,,.. . 0
•
�.�►
•
*.
�, �� ti
; .
71
1 ..7 •
I a Y .J
r < ra i.
-t • 1.,
U.U.
- W W W LL1 if a. rii
W '�
r _ (......,....- ,
/ •. j:::74 ". -' :# q :
rlil
•
0
I.
r-' r-v:. :: : '. . . t. ,s.: 0,
. ta. I
*1
i c-
p.
111
ik I 11 .
..
....
. .. ... _... .., _. , ..., _
. .
kl
a u
a a if _.
..
0
Er)
. .
A
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 1 of 34
► P�� �?8 CG i45-1 N-00643(1 )
Applicant Name: Application Title:
WELD (COUNTY) WELCO03 - ROADS
Period of Performance Start: Period of Performance End:
09-14-2013
Subgrant Application - Entire Application
Application Title: WELCO03 - ROADS
Application Number: PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00643(1 )
Application Type: Subgrant Application (PW)
Preparer Information
Prefix Mr.
First Name STEPHEN
Middle Initial
Last Name SUHY
Title PROJECT SPECIALIST
Agency/Organization Name FEMA-DHS
Address 1 9200 E. MINERAL AVE.
Address 2
City CENTENNIAL
State CO
Zip 80112
Email deanna.butterbaugh@state.co.us
Is the application preparer the Point of Contact? No
Point of Contact Information
Prefix Mr.
First Name Roy
Middle Initial
Last Name Rudisill
Title Director - OEM
Agency/Organization Weld County
Address 1 1150 O Street
Address 2
City Greeley
State CO
ZIP 80632
Phone 970-304-6540
https://connectl .dhs.gov/emm ie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination .do?... 4/30/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 2 of 34
Fax
Email rrudisill@weld.gov.com
Alternate Point of Contact Information
Prefix
First Name
Middle Initial
Last Name
Title
Agency/Organization
Address 1
Address 2
City
State
ZIP
Phone
Fax
Email
Project Description
Disaster Number: 4145
Pre-Application Number: PA-08-CO-4145-RPA-0088
Applicant ID: 123-99123-00
Applicant Name: WELD (COUNTY)
Subdivision:
Project Number: WELCO03
Standard Project Number/Title: 305 - Road and Culvert Washout
Please Indicate the Project Type: Neither Alternate nor Improved
Application Title: WELCO03 - ROADS
Category: C. ROADS & BRIDGES
1 Percentage Work Completed? 95.0
As of Date: 01 -04-2014
Comments
The applicant must notify the state if there are any changes in the scope of work prior to starting the repairs. Failure
to notify the State Division of Emergency Management may jeopardize receipt of federal funds.
Attachments
Damage Facilities (Part 1 of 2)
Facility Site
Number Facility Name Address County City State ZIP Previously Action
Damaged?
1 ROADS COUNTY WIDE Weld CO 80632 No
Comments
Mips://cm-meet I .dhs.gov/em111 is . Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination .do?... 4/30/2014
V
S _
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 3 of 34
Attachments
User Date Document Type Description Hard Copy File File Name Action
Reference
STEPHEN 02-06- Photos 1 PHOTOS WELCO03-WELD- 1 PHOTOS.pdf( 120.28 View
SUHY 2014 1 PHOTOS kb)
STEPHEN 02-06- Photos 2 PHOTOS WELCO03-WELD- 2 PHOTOS .pdf(197.90 View
SUHY 2014 2 PHOTOS kb)
STEPHEN 02-06- WELCO03-WELD- 3 PHOTOS .pdf(227.79
SUHY 2014 Photos 3 PHOTOS 3PHOTOS kb) View
STEPHEN 02-06- Photos 4 PHOTOS WELCO03-WELD- 4 PHOTOS .pdf(345.37 View
SUHY 2014 4 PHOTOS kb)
STEPHEN 02-06- Photos 5 PHOTOS WELCO03-WELD- 5 PHOTOS.pdf(154. 53 View
SUHY 2014 5PHOTOS kb)
STEPHEN 02-06- WELCO03-WELD- 6 & 7 PHOTOS.pdf
SUHY 2014 Photos 6 PHOTOS 6 PHOTOS View
(392.75 kb)
STEPHEN 02-06- W
Photos 8 PHOTOS ELCO03-WELD- 8 PHOTOS.pdf(216.86 View
SUHY 2014 8 PHOTOS kb)
STEPHEN 02-06- Photos 9 PHOTOS WELCO03-WELD- 9 PHOTOS.pdf(114.86 View
SUHY 2014 9 PHOTOS kb)
STEPHEN 02-06- Preliminary WELCO03-WELD- 10 PHOTOS.pdf(207.41
SUHY 2014 Environment 10 PHOTOS 10 PHOTOS kb) View
Assessment
STEPHEN 02-06- Photos 11 PHOTOS WELCO03-WELD- 11 PHOTOS.pdf( 166. 92 View
SUHY 2014 11 PHOTOS kb)
STEPHEN 02-06- WELCO03-WELD- 12 PHOTOS.pdf(206.69
SUHY 2014 Photos 12 PHOTOS 12 PHOTOS kb) View
STEPHEN 02-06- Photos 13 PHOTOS WELLCO03- 13 PHOTOS.pdf(260. 10 View
SUHY 2014 WELD-13 PHOTOS kb)
STEPHEN 02-06- WELCO03-WELD- 14 PHOTOS.pdf(147. 12
SUHY 2014 Photos 14 PHOTOS 14 PHOTOS kb) View
STEPHEN 02-06- Map MAP1 WELCO03-WELD- MAP1 .pdf(173.29 kb) View
SUHY 2014 MAP1
STEPHEN 02-06- Map MAP2 WELCO03-WELD- MAP2.pdf( 124.75 kb) View
SUHY 2014 MAP2
STEPHEN 02-06- Map MAP3 WELCO03-WELD- MAP3.pdf( 144.45 kb) View
SUHY 2014 MAP3
STEPHEN 02-06- Map MAP4 WELCO03-WELD- MAP4.pdf(189.22 kb) View
SUHY 2014 MAP4
STEPHEN 02-06- Map MAPS WELCO03-WELD- MAP5.pdf(155.86 kb) View
SUHY 2014 MAPS
STEPHEN 02-06- Map MAP6 WELCO03-WELD- MAP6.pdf(165.80 kb) View
SUHY 2014 MAP6
STEPHEN 02-06- Map MAP7 WELCO03-WELD- MAP7.pdf(115.22 kb) View
SUHY 2014 MAP7
STEPHEN 02-06- Map MAP8 WELCO03-WELD- MAP8.pdf(115.21 kb) View
SUHY 2014 MAP8
STEPHEN 02-06- Map MAP9 WELCO03-WELD- MAP9.pdf( 134.72 kb) View
SUHY 2014 MAP9
STEPHEN 02-06- Map MAP10 WELCO03-WELD- MAP10.pdf( 118. 14 kb) View
https://connect l .dhs.gov/emm ie/,Danal n to=isource.tema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 4/30/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 4 of 34
SUHY 2014 MAP10
STEPHEN 02-06- Map MAP11 WELCO03-WELD- MAP11 .pdf(138.96 kb) View
SUHY 2014 MAP11
STEPHEN 02-06- Map MAP12 WELCO03-WELD- MAP12.pdf(140.82 kb) View
SUHY 2014 MAP12
ANTHONY 04-15- Version 1 - Version 1 - WELCO03 -
SAWNEY 2014 Project Worksheet SOW SOW.pdf(40.30 kb) View
Facility Name: ROADS
Address 1 : COUNTY WIDE
Address 2:
County: Weld
City:
State: CO
ZIP: 80632
Was this site previously damaged? No
Percentage Work Completed? 75. 00 %
PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00643(0):
COUNTY WIDE
Location :
****Version 1 ****
PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00643(0):
County Roads, Category C. Permanent Road / Culvert Repair
Lat — 40.40955.
Long. -104.64018
During the incident period of September 11 . 2013 to September 30, 2013,
Weld County, Colorado received heavy rainfall and debris in the creeks.
streams and rivers which caused surface gravel removal and scour damage
to numerous roads and bridges in Weld County. This project worksheet
addresses damages to 26 County road locations. 6 ditches (filled with
sediment) that are part of the road locations and 2 culverts dislodged and
damaged) locations for a total of 28 locations.
On December 2nd and 3rd. 2013, Kathleen Ruvarac. FEMA TAC Bridge
Specialist. David Ray. FEMA Hazard Mitigation Specialist and Curtis Hall
and Travis Smith, Weld County employees, performed a site investigation
at this location to document damages. The repairs were substantially
complete at the time of inspection.
Applicant provided photos of damaged sites which are included in this PW.
DAMAGE DESCRIPTION:
LOC 1 . 40.40955.-104.64018 to 40.39939.-104.64005. EM-Fern-18th-.0,
on Fern Ave between E. 18th to E. 24th St. , length 3.677 LF X width 23 LF
= 84571 SF X Depth 0. 14 FT /27 = 438.52 CY ABC Gravel.
LOC 2 . 40.39928,-104.64178 to 40.39943. -104.63076.. EM-E24=US34-. 0.
on E. 24th St. between Btwn. US 34 & Hemlock . length 3.083 LF X width
22 LF = 67826 SF X Depth 0. 1 FT /27 = 251 .21 CY ABC Gravel.
Imps://connect l .dhs.gov/emmie/, Danalnfo=isource. tema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 4/30/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 5 of 34
LOC 3 . 40. 39943. -104.63076 to 40.41022.-104.63052. EM-Hem-18st-.0.
on Hemlock between Btwn. E. 24th & E. 18th st . length 3.940 LF X width
22 LF = 86680 SF X Depth 0. 16 FT /27 = 513.66 CY ABC Gravel.
LOC 4 . 40.41053, -104.62870 to 40.41165,-104.62781 . EM-Hol-18st-. 1 ,
on Holly between Btwn. E. 18th st. to End . length 415 LF X width 22 LF =
9130 SF X Depth 0.58 FT /27 = 196. 13 CY ABC Gravel.
LOC 5 . 40.41396, -104.62574 to 40.41401 . -104.62137, EM-Hol-1 8st-. 1 ,
on Holly between Btwn. E. 18th st. to End . length 570 LF X width 22 LF =
12540 SF X Depth 0.07 FT /27 = 32.51 CY ABC Gravel.
LOC 6: Not Used - Visited Site but damages captured on another project
worksheet.
LOC 7 . 40. 35152.-104.42676 to 40.34905,-104.42233, EM-380-67-.3. on
CR380 between From CR 67 & CR 69 . length 1 . 547 LF X width 26 LF =
40222 SF X Depth 0.47 FT /27 = 700. 16 CY ABC Gravel.
LOC 8 . 40.36862,-104.91708 to 40. 36405, -104.91706. EM-15.5-52-.0. on
CR15. 5 between Btwn. CR 52 & CR 54 , length 1 ,680 LF X width 24 LF =
40320 SF X Depth 0.25 FT /27 = 373.33 CY ABC Gravel.
LOC 8A 40. 36862,-104.91708 to 40. 36405, -104. 91706. Ditches filled in
with silt and gravel on CR15. 5 between Btwn. CR 52 & CR 54 . length
3, 360 LF
LOC 9 . 40.36405.-104.91706 to 40.36393,-104. 91421 . EM-52-15.5-.02,
on CR52 between Btwn. CR 15. 5 to CR17 North . length 794 LF X width 24
Damage Description and Dimensions: LF = 19056 SF X Depth 0.33 FT /27 = 232.91 CY ABC Gravel.
LOC 9A 40. 36405.-104. 91706 to 40. 36393.-104.91421 , Ditches filled in
with silt and gravel on CR52 between Btwn. CR 15.5 to CR17 North , length
1 .588 LF
LOC 10 . 40. 36342, -104.91982 to 40.36330.-104. 91710. EM-52-15. 5-.02,
on CR52 between Btwn. 15 to 15. 5 , length 1 . 100 LF X width 24 LF =
26400 SF X Depth 0. 35 FT /27 = 342.22 CY ABC Gravel.
LOC 11 . 40. 36330,-104.91710 to 40. 36257,-104.91708, EM- 15.5-52-.01 .
on CR15.5 between Btwn. CR 50 to CR 52 , length 273 LF X width 24 LF =
6552 SF X Depth 0. 19 FT /27 = 46. 11 CY ABC Gravel.
LOC 12 . 40. 36313,-104.75124 to 40. 35960,-104.74974. EM-44th-54st-.2.
on 44th Ave. between Btwn. 49th St. & 54th St. Rd. . length 1 ,435 LF X
width 26 LF = 37310 SF X Depth 0.2 FT /27 = 276. 37 CY ABC Gravel.
LOC 13 . 40.35437.-104.76805 to 40.35334,-104.77530. EM-54st-com, on
54th St. Rd. between Btwn. CR396 & 49th ave . length 2. 062 LF X width 28
LF = 57736 SF X Depth 0. 17 FT /27 = 363. 52 CY ABC Gravel.
LOC 14 . 40. 34116.-104.86822 to 40.34142,. -104.88109. EM-48. 5-257-
.80, on CR48.5 between Btwn. SH257 & CR 17 , length 3,600 LF X width
22 LF = 79200 SF X Depth 0.06 FT /27 = 176.00 CY ABC Gravel.
LOC 15 . 40.07710. -104. 05264 to 40. 07708. -104.05160. EM-Brome-
Westview. on Brome St. between From Buffalo Rd. to deadend . length
345 LF X width 22 LF = 7590 SF X Depth 0. 17 FT /27 = 47.79 CY ABC
Gravel.
LOC 16 . 40. 10950,-105.04328 to 40. 10963.-105.02800, EM-16.5-1 -.0, on
https://connect I .dhs.gov/emmiet. Danaln tu=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatch Destination.do?... 4/30/2014
a As iimimmoimon.._
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 6 of 34
CR16.5 between Btwn. CR 1 & CR 3.25 , length 4,358 LF X width 25 LF =
108950 SF X Depth 0.27 FT /27 = 1 . 089.50 CY ABC Gravel.
LOC 17 . 40. 10955.-105. 03193. EM-16. 5-1 -.0. on CR16.5 between AT
INTERSECTION WITH CR 3.25 , length 325 LF X width 5 LF = 1625 SF X
Depth 0.4 FT /27 = 24.07 CY ABC Gravel.
LOC 18 . 40.01478,-104. 92361 to 40.01482,-104.90492, EM-4-15-.0. on
CR4 between Btwn. CR 15 & CR 17 length 5.247 LF X width 22 LF =
115434 SF X Depth 0. 17 FT /27 = 726.81 CY ABC Gravel.
LOC 19 . 40.01482,-104.90492 to 40.02916,-104.90489, EM-CUL21 -14-. 1 .
on CR21 between Btwn. CR 8 & CR14. 5 , length 3,027 LF X width 24 LF =
72648 SF X Depth 0.03 FT /27 = 80.72 CY ABC Gravel.
LOC 19A 40.01482.-104.90492 to 40.02916.-104.90489. Ditches filled in
with silt and gravel on CR21 between Btwn. CR 8 & CR14. 5 . length 6.054
LF
LOC 20 . 40.07565. -104.86742, 40.07984, -104.86740. EM-CUL21 -14-. 1 ,
on CR21 between Btwn. CR 8 & CR14.5 , length 727 LF X width 24 LF =
17448 SF X Depth 0. 17 FT /27 = 109.86 CY ABC Gravel.
LOC 20A 40.07565. -104.86742, 40.07984, -104.86740, Ditches filled in
with silt and gravel on CR21 between Btwn. CR 8 & CR14.5 . length 1 ,454
LF
LOC 21 . 40.07862, -104.86760. EM-CUL21 -14-. 1 , (181N DIA CMP
CULVERT, 40FT LENGTH) on CR21 between Btwn. CR 8 & CR14.5 ,
length 40 LF - No damages identified
LOC 22 . 40.08739,-104.86764 to 40.08939.-104.86766. EM-CUL21 -14-. 1 ,
on CR21 between Btwn. CR 8 & CR14.5 . length 1 ,530 LF X width 10 LF =
15300 SF X Depth 0. 08 FT /27 = 45.33 CY ABC Gravel.
LOC 22A 40.08739,-104.86764 to 40.08939,-104.86766 Ditches filled in
with silt and gravel on CR21 between Btwn. CR 8 & CR14. 5 . length 3,060
LOC 23 . 40.08752,-104.86794 to 40. 08760,-104.87928. EM-14-19-. 5. on
CR14 between Btwn. CR 19 & CR 21 . length 3. 175 LF X width 10 LF =
31750 SF X Depth 0.65 FT /27 = 764.35 CY ABC Gravel.
LOC 23A 40.08752,-104.86794 to 40.08760.-104.87928. Ditches filled in
with silt and gravel on CR14 between Btwn. CR 19 & CR 21 , length 6.350
LOC 24 . 40. 18950,-104. 88708. EM-CUL28-17-.6, (151N DIA CMP
CULVERT. 40FT LENGTH) on CR28 between Btwn. CR 15.75 & CR 19 ,
length 40 LF
LOC 25 . 40. 17529,-104.95158 to 40. 17525 .-104.95578. EM-26-11 . 5-.2.
on CR26 between Btwn. CR 11 .5 & CR 13 . length 1 .500 LF X width 29 LF
= 43, 500SF X Depth 0.25 FT /27 = 402.78 CY ABC Gravel.
LOC 26 . 40. 16747.-104.92354 to 40. 17516,-104.92327, EM-15-24-0, on
CR15 between Btwn. CR 24 & CR 26 . length 2. 807 LF X width 23 LF =
64561 SF X Depth 0. 17 FT /27 = 406.50 CY ABC Gravel.
LOC 27 . 40. 18869,-104.87872 to 40. 18805.-104.87530, EM-28-21 -.4. on
CR28 between Btwn . CR 19 & CR 21 . length 2.717 LF X width 24 LF =
65208 SF X Depth 0.06 FT /27 = 144.91 CY ABC Gravel.
https://connect 1 .dhs.gov/emmie/, Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?.. . 4/30/2014
_
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 7 of 34
LOC 28 . 40.07560. -104.05543 to 40.07916. -104.05263. EM-Buffalo-
Westview. on Buffalo St. between Btwn. E.County Line Rd. & Westview
Rd. length 2.070 LF X width 22 LF = 45540 SF X Depth 0. 17 FT /27 =
286.73 CY ABC Gravel.
LOC 29 . 40.07918, -104.05542 to 40.07916. -104.05263, EM-Westview-
Westview. on Westview St. between Btwn. E.County Line Rd. & Buffalo
Rd. . length 800 LF X width 22 LF = 17600 SF X Depth 0. 17 FT /27 =
110.81 CY ABC Gravel.
Total gravel 8.048.91 CY. total length of ditches 21 .866LF and total culverts
CMP 80FT.
****Version 1 ****
PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00643(0) :
WORK COMPLETED:
Applicant will use Force Account and Contract Services to restore damaged
roads to pre-disaster condition. function, capacity and use.
Note: Rounding errors may exist. The quantities show are rounded to the
whole number. however. the cost is correctly calculated. (See attached
calculation spreadsheet.)
LOC 1 : Repair EM-Fern-18th-.0 on Fern Ave between E. 18th to E. 24th St.
, 438.52 CY x 1 .82 (Conversion Factor CY ABC Class 6 Material to Tons =
798. 10 tons x $33.70/ton (CDOT Item Number 304-06000 Aggregate Base
Course Class 6 x 2 due to economies of scale as compared with number of
CDOT annual projects) = $26. 895.96.
(Above note where applicable applies to following locations).
LOC 2: Repair EM-E24=US34-.0 on E. 24th St. between Btwn. US 34 &
Hemlock . 251 .21 CY X 1 .82 = 457.20 TONS X $33.70 /TON = $15.407.56
ABC Gravel CDOT 304-06000
LOC 3: Repair EM-Hem-18st-.0 on Hemlock between Btwn. E. 24th & E.
Scope of Work: 18th st . 513.66 CY X 1 .82 = 934.86 TONS X $33.70 /TON = $31 . 504.78
ABC Gravel CDOT 304-06000
LOC 4: Repair EM-Hol-18st-. 1 on Holly between Btwn. E. 18th st. to End ,
196. 13 CY X 1 .82 = 356.95 TONS X $33.70 /TON = $ 12,029. 19 ABC
Gravel CDOT 304-06000
LOC 5: Repair EM-Hol-18st-. 1 on Holly between Btwn. E. 18th st. to End ,
32.51 CY X 1 .82 = 59. 17 TONS X $33.70 /TON = $ 1 . 994.04 ABC Gravel
CDOT 304-06000
LOC 6: NOT USED. Costs captured on another PW. Deleted as to avoid
any duplication of benefits.
LOC 7: Repair EM-380-67-. 3 on CR380 between From CR 67 & CR 69 ,
700. 16 CY X 1 .82 = 1 ,274.29 TONS X $33.70 /TON = $42. 943.66 ABC
Gravel CDOT 304-06000
LOC 8: Repair EM-15. 5-52-.0 on CR15.5 between Btwn. CR 52 & CR 54
373.33 CY X 1 .82 = 679.47 TONS X $33.70 /TON = $22.898.03 ABC
Gravel CDOT 304-06000
LOC 8A: Repair Regrade ditches on CR15.5 between Btwn. CR 52 & CR
https://connectl .dhs.gov/em m ie/,Danal nfo=isource.tema.net,SSL+dispatch Destination .do?. . . 4/30/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 8 of 34
54 . 3,360.00 FT X $3.40 /FT = $11 .424.00 Clean ditch FEMA 3070
LOC 9: Repair EM-52-15. 5-. 02 on CR52 between Btwn. CR 15.5 to CR17
North . 232. 91 CY X 1 .82 = 423.89 TONS X $33.70 /TON = $ 14,285. 10
ABC Gravel CDOT 304-06000
LOC 9A: Repair Regrade ditches on CR52 between Btwn. CR 15.5 to
CR17 North . 1 . 588.00 FT X $3.40 /FT = $5. 399.20 Clean ditch FEMA
3070
LOC 10: Repair EM-52-15. 5-.02 on CR52 between Btwn. 15 to 15.5 .
342.22 CY X 1 .82 = 622. 84 TONS X $33.70 /TON = $20. 989.86 ABC
Gravel CDOT 304-06000
LOC 11 : Repair EM-15. 5-52-.01 on CR15.5 between Btwn. CR 50 to CR
52 . 46. 11 CY X 1 .82 = 8191 TONS X $33. 70 /TON = $2,827.91 ABC
Gravel CDOT 304-06000
LOC 12: Repair EM-44th-54st-.2 on 44th Ave. between Btwn. 49th St. &
54th St. Rd. . 276.37 CY X 1 .82 = 502.99 TONS X $33.70 /TON =
$ 16. 950. 90 ABC Gravel CDOT 304-06000
LOC 13: Repair EM-54st-com on 54th St. Rd. between Btwn. CR396 & 49th
ave . 363.52 CY X 1 .82 = 661 .61 TONS X $33.70 /TON = $22,296. 32 ABC
Gravel CDOT 304-06000
LOC 14: Repair EM-48. 5-257-.80 on CR48.5 between Btwn. SH257 & CR
17 , 176.00 CY X 1 .82 = 320.32 TONS X $33.70 /TON = $10,794.78 ABC
Gravel CDOT 304-06000
LOC 16: Repair EM-16. 5-1 -.0 on CR16. 5 between Btwn. CR 1 & CR 3.25 ,
1 ,089. 50 CY X 1 .82 = 1 ,982.89 TONS X $33.70 /TON = 566.823.39 ABC
Gravel CDOT 304-06000
LOC 17: Repair EM-16.5-1 -.0 on CR16.5 between AT INTERSECTION
WITH CR 3.25 , 24.07 CY X 1 .82 = 43.81 TONS X $33.70 /TON =
$1 ,476. 56 ABC Gravel CDOT 304-06000
LOC 18: Repair EM-4-15-.0 on CR4 between Btwn. CR 15 & CR 17 .
726.81 CY X 1 .82 = 1 ,322.79 TONS X $33.70 /TON = $44.577.96 ABC
Gravel CDOT 304-06000
LOC 19: Repair EM-CUL21 -14-. 1 on CR21 between Btwn. CR 8 &
CR14.5 . 80.72 CY X 1 .82 = 146. 91 TONS X $33.70 /TON = $4.950.88
ABC Gravel CDOT 304-06000
LOC 19A: Repair Regrade ditches on CR21 between Btwn. CR 8 &
CR14. 5 . 6. 054.00 FT X $3.40 /FT = $20. 583.60 Clean ditch FEMA Cost
Code 3070
LOC 20: Repair EM-CUL21 - 14-. 1 on CR21 between Btwn. CR 8 &
CR14.5 . 109.86 CY X 1 .82 = 199.94 TONS X $33.70 /TON = $6,738.02
ABC Gravel CDOT 304-06000
LOC 20A: Repair Regrade ditches on CR21 between Btwn. CR8 &
CR14. 5 . 1 .454. 00 FT X $3.40 /FT = $4. 943.60 Clean ditch FEMA Cost
Code 3070
LOC 21 : EM-CUL21 -14-. 1 . (18IN DIA CMP CULVERT. 40FT LENGTH) on
CR21 between Btwn. CR8 & CR14. 5 , 40.00 FT X $48.49 /FT =
$1 ,939.60 181N CMP CDOT 603-10180 (Applicant states no damages to
this site) See Project Note #10.
https://connect I .dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination .do?... 4/30/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 9 of 34
LOC 22: Repair EM-CUL21 -14-. 1 on CR21 between Btwn. CR 8 &
CR14.5 . 45.33 CY X 1 .82 = 82.51 TONS X $33.70 /TON = $2,780.47 ABC
Gravel CDOT 304-06000
LOC 22A: Repair Regrade ditches on CR21 between Btwn. CR 8 &
CR14.5 . 3. 060.00 FT X $3.40 /FT = $10.404.00 Clean ditch FEMA Cost
Code 3070
LOC 23: Repair EM-14-19-. 5 on CR14 between Btwn. CR 19 & CR 21 ,
764. 35 CY X 1 .82 = 1 ,391 . 12 TONS X $33.70 /TON = $46. 880.76 ABC
Gravel CDOT 304-06000
LOC 23A: Repair Regrade ditches on CR14 between Btwn. CR 19 & CR
21 . 6,350. 00 FT X $3.40 /FT = $21 . 590.00 Clean ditch FEMA Cost Code
3070
LOC 24: Repair EM-CUL28-17-.6. (15IN DIA CMP CULVERT. 40FT
LENGTH) on CR28 between Btwn. CR 15.75 & CR 19 . 40. 00 FT X
$48.49 /FT = $1 ,939.60 18IN CMP CDOT 603-10180
LOC 25: Repair EM-26-11 .5-.2 on CR26 between Btwn. CR 11 .5 & CR 13,
402.78 CY X 1 . 82 = 733. 06 TONS X $33.70 /TON = $24.704. 11 . ABC
Gravel CDOT 304-06000
LOC 26: Repair EM-15-24-0 on CR15 between Btwn. CR 24 & CR 26 ,
406. 50 CY X 1 .82 = 739.82 TONS X $33.70 /TON = $24. 931 .98 ABC
Gravel CDOT 304-06000
LOC 27: Repair EM-28-21 -.4 on CR28 between Btwn. CR 19 & CR 21 ,
144.91 CY X 1 .82 = 263.73 TONS X $33.70 /TON = $8. 887.71 ABC Gravel
CDOT 304-06000
Total tons of aggregate = 14. 892.71TONS. total length of ditches =
21 ,866FT. total length of culverts = 80FT. total costs = $580, 107.80.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED:
LOC 15: Repair EM-Brome-Westview on Brome St. between From Buffalo
Rd. to deadend , 47.79 CY X 1 .82 = 86. 98 TONS X $33.70 /TON =
$2.931 .08 ABC Gravel CDOT 304-06000
LOC 28: Repair EM-Buffalo-Westview on Buffalo St. between Btwn.
E.County Line Rd. & Westview Rd. . 286.73 CY X 1 .82 = 521 .85 TONS X
$33.70 /TON = $17,586.50 ABC Gravel CDOT 304-06000
LOC 29: Repair EM-Westview-Westview on Westview St. between Btwn.
E.County Line Rd. & Buffalo Rd. . 110.81 CY X 1 .82 = 201 .68 TONS X
$33.70 /TON = $6.796.72 ABC Gravel CDOT 304-06000
Project Notes:
1 . During repair or reconstruction, applicant may incur additional costs
related to clearing and grubbing, placement of topsoil. erosion and
sedimentation control, sanitary facilities. dewatering, mobilization and
flagging/traffic control. Such costs are generally addressed in the In-place-
unit costs of repair or reconstruction items. and not specifically addressed
in the Scope of Work. However. if a project requires an extraordinary use of
any such items. to where a specific reference in the PW should be
considered. applicant is advised to contract Colorado Department of
Emergency Management requesting a revision to the PW's Scope of Work.
2. Applicant has completed a substantial percentage of the work but will
https://connect I .dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource. tema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination .do?. . . 4/30/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 10 of 34
not have cost data available within the fourteen day Pocket Guide rule. Per
Field Operations Pocket Guide. Section 7. Cost Estimates, Page 26, "If the
applicant has not produced cost data within two weeks of the site
inspection, the Project Specialist will prepare the PW on the basis of an
estimate for the work accomplished". Applicant. CO State representative
and FEMA personnel jointly conducted all inspections and agreed to use
CDOT costs for in-place costs to derive estimates on this project
worksheet. Applicant understands that all actual support documentation.
invoices, FA records. contract and proof of payment will be required for final
reconciliation and or closeout process. Attached is the CDOT average in-
place cost for materials.
3. The Applicant will notify FEMA and the State of their intent to perform
permanent work related to this site before any work commences in the field.
Failure to do so may jeopardize the sub-grant for permanent work related to
the work in this sub-grant.
4. Pursuant to 44 CFR 13.42. Grantees and Subgrantees are required to
retain records. including source documentation, to support
expenditures/costs incurred against the grant award, for 3 years from the
date of submission to FEMA of the final Financial Status Report.
5. The applicant must obtain all required federal , state. and local permits
prior to the commencement of work.
6. The subgrantee is requesting direct administrative costs that are
directly chargeable to this specific project. Associated eligible work is
related to administration of the PA project only and in accordance with 44
CFR 13.22. These costs are treated consistently and uniformly as direct
costs in all federal awards and other subgrantee activities and are not
included in any approved indirect costs.
7. Project was reviewed for 406 Hazard Mitigation and is HMP is
attached.
8. The applicant is aware that all projects are subject to an insurance
review as stated in 44 C. F. R. Sections 206.252 and 206.253. If applicable.
an insurance determination will be made either as anticipated proceeds or
actual proceeds in accordance with the applicant's insurance policy that
may affect the total amount of the project.
9. The applicant is required to adhere to State and Federal Government
Procurement rules and regulations and maintain adequate records to
support the basis for all purchasing of goods and materials and contracting
services for projects approved under the Public Assistance program. as
stated in 44 CFR 13.36. The applicant has advised they have followed their
normal procurement procedures.
10. After this PW was entered into EMMIE. the applicant requested that
changes be made to the Damage Description and Scope of Work for Sites
21 and 24. Site 21 did not have any damages and the estimated cost for
$ 1 ,939.60 will remain part of the original estimated cost of $580. 107.80 as
actual costs of repairs will be captured at close out for this large project.
Sites 15. 28 and 29 were identified as not having any work performed to
date. Estimated costs for the sites will remain the same as stated.
****Version 1 ****
This Addendum is being written to capture damages to CR15.5 consisting
of eroded roadway shoulder that was not captured during the initial field
survey. It was identified by the Applicant during their review of PW
WELCO03. As a measure to prevent future erosion. the Applicant is
requesting HMP to stabilize the side slopes consisting of turf reinforcing
mat and willow cuttings.
In order to rebuild eroded roadway shoulder that was washed out during the
disaster, the Applicant is requesting at Location 8, CR 15. 5. (40.36548. -
104.91711 ) the restoration of 145FT X 24FT X 4FT / 27 = 515. 56CY of
embankment material (common borrow) at $ 10.00/CY (CDOT 203-00062)
https://connect I .dhs.gov/emm ic !. Danalnfo=isource. fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?. . . 4/30/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page I I of 34
= $5. 155.56 and provide traffic control for 2 days at $ 1 ,000.00/day (CDOT
estimate) = $2. 000.00. TOTAL $7. 155. 56.
Hazard Mitigation Proposal
Is effective mitigation feasible on this site? No
If you answered Yes to the above question, the next question is required
Will mitigation be performed on this site? No
If you answered Yes to the above question, the next question is required
Do you wish to attach a Hazard Mitigation No
Proposal?
If you answered Yes to the above question. the next two questions are required
Please provide the Scope of Work for the estimate:
(maximum 4000 characters)
Would you like to add the Hazard Mitigation No
Proposal as a cost line item to the project cost?
GIS Coordinates
Project Location Latitude Longitude
LOCATION 1 40.40955 -104.64018
40.39939 -104.64005
LOCATION 2 40.39943 -104.63076
40.39928 -104.64178
LOCATION 3 40.39943 -104.63076
40.41022 -104.63052
LOCATION 4 40.41165 -104.62781
40.41053 -104.6287
LOCATION 5 40.41401 -104.62137
40.41396 -104.62574
LOCATION 7 40.35152 -104.42676
40.34905 -104.42233
LOCATION 8 40.36405 -104.91705
40. 36862 -104.91708
LOCATION 8A 40.36405 -104.91706
40.36862 -104.91708
LOCATION 9 40.36405 -104.91706
40.36393 -104.91421
LOCATION 9A 40.36393 -104. 91421
40.36405 -104. 91706
LOCATION 10 40.36342 -104. 91982
40. 3633 -104.9171
LOCATION 11 40.36257 -104.91708
40. 3633 -104.9171
LOCATION 12 40.36313 -104.75124
40. 3596 -104.74974
LOCATION 13 40.35437 -104.76805
40.35334 -104.7753
LOCATION 14 40.34142 -104.88109
40. 34116 -104.86822
LOCATION 15 40. 0771 -104.05264
40.07708 -104.0516
LOCATION 16 40. 10963 -105.028
https://connect I .dhs.gov/emmie/,DanaEnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?. . . 4/30/20 14
a
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 12 of 34
40. 1095 -105.04328
LOCATION 17 40. 10955 -105.03193
LOCATION 18 40.01478 -104.92361
40.01482 -104.90492
LOCATION 19 40.02916 -104.90489
40.01482 -104.90492
LOCATION 19A 40.01482 -104.90492
40.02916 -104. 90489
LOCATION 20 40.07984 -104.8674
40.07565 -104.86742
LOCATION 20A 40.07984 -104.8674
40.07565 -104.86742
LOCATION 21 40.07862 -104.8676
LOCATION 22 40.08739 -104.86764
40.08939 -104.86766
LOCATION 22A 40.08739 -104.86764
40.08939 -104.86766
LOCATION 23 40.0876 -104.87928
40.08752 -104.86794
LOCATION 23A 40.08752 -104.86794
40.0876 -104. 87928
LOCATION 24 40. 1895 -104.88708
LOCATION 25 40. 17529 -104.95158
40. 17525 -104.95578
LOCATION 26 40. 16747 -104.92354
40. 17516 -104.92327
LOCATION 27 40. 18869 -104.87872
40. 18805 -104.8753
LOCATION 28 40.0756 -104.05543
40.07916 -104.05263
Special Considerations
1 . Does the damaged facility or item of work have insurance coverage and/or is it an insurable No
risk (e.g. . buildings. equipment. vehicles. etc)?
If you would like to make any comments. please enter them below.
(maximum 4000 characters;
Insurance documents on file at the JFO.
2. Is the damaged facility located within a floodplain or coastal high hazard area and/or does it No
have an impact on a floodplain or wetland?
If you would like to make any comments. please enter them below.
(maximum 4000 characters;:
Flood Map 080266 0637. various panels.
3. Is the damaged facility or item of work located within or adjacent to a Coastal Barrier Resource No
System Unit or an Otherwise Protected Area?
4. Will the proposed facility repairs/reconstruction change the pre-disaster conditions (e.g. . No
footprint, material, location. capacity.. use of function)?
5. Does the applicant have a hazard mitigation proposal or would the applicant like technical No
assistance for a hazard mitigation proposal?
6. Is the damaged facility on the National Register of Historic Places or the state historic listing? Is No
https://connect I .dhs.goviem m ie/.. Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatclilJestinat ion .do'?. . . 4/30/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 13 of 34
it older than 50 years? Are there more. similar buildings near the site?
7. Are there any pristine or undisturbed areas on . or near, the project site? Are there large tracts No
of forestland?
8. Are there any hazardous materials at or adjacent to the damaged facility and/or item of work? No
9. Are there any other environmental or controversial issues associated with the damaged facility Yes
and/or item of work?
If you would like to make any comments. please enter them below.
(maximum 4000 characters)
EHP to conduct review.
Attachments
User Date Document Type Description Hard Copy File File Name Action
Reference
02-
STEPHEN 06- Letter FLOODPLAIN WELCO03-WELD- FIRMETTES.pdf View
SUHY 2014 MAPS FIRMETTES (3. 34 Mb)
02- WELCO03-WELD-
STEPHEN Environmental/Historic SPECIAL SPECIAL SC SHEET.pdf View
SUHY 2O14 Document CONSIDERATIONS CONSIDERATIONS (51 .28 kb)
For Category C, D, E, F, and G Projects only
Is effective mitigation feasible on this project? Yes
If you answered Yes to the above question , the next question is required
Will mitigation be performed on any sites in this Yes
project?
If you answered Yes to the above question. the next question is required
Do you wish to attach a Hazard Mitigation Yes
Proposal?
If you answered Yes to the above question. the next two questions are required
The flooding during the incident period of September 11
through September 30. 2013 washed out culverts at GPS
locations: 40.07862 -104.86760 and 40. 1 8950 - 104.88708. To
reduce future damages the applicant proposes to install Rip
Rap and Geo Tech at inlet and outlet of the culverts at the
referenced sites. LOCATION 21 GPS: 40.07862 -104.86760
INSTALL RIP RAP 10FT X 10FT 1 . 5FT = 150/27 = 6CY X
Please provide the Scope of Work $83. 17 = $499.02 X 2 = $998.04 GEO TECH FABRIC 10FT X
for the estimate 10FT = 100/9 = 11 SY X $3.07 = $33.77 X 2 = $67.54 COST
OF REPAIR = $1939.60 COST OF MITIGATION = $1065.58
MITIGATION % = 55% LOCATION 24 GPS : 40. 18950 -
104.88708 INSTALL RIP RAP 10FT X 10FT 1 .5FT = 150/27
=6CY X $83. 17 = $499.02 X 2 = $998. 04 GEO TECH FABRIC
10FT X 10FT = 100/9 = 11SY X $3.07 = $33.77 X 2 = $67.54
COST OF REPIR = $ 1939.60 COST OF MITIGATION =
$ 1065.58 MITIGATION % = 55% Mitigation is cost-effective
per RP9526. 1 . VII . B. 2. Appendix A. I . A, 5 - 100%-Rule
Would you like to add the Hazard Mitigation Yes
Proposal as a cost line item to the project cost?
Hazard Mitigation Proposal - 0909
# Code Material and/or Description Unit Unit of Unit Price Subgrant Type Cost Estimate Action
Quantity Measure Budget Class
*** Version 0 ***
i i r 1
https://connect l .dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatch Destination .do?... 4/30/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 14 of 34
1 9999 Rip rap 24 CY $ 83. 17 $ 1 .996.08
2 9999 Geotextile fabric 44 SY $ 3.07 $ 135.08
*** Version 1 ***
3 9999 Turff Reinforcement Mat 111 . 17 SY $ 14.00 $ 1 .556.38
4 9999 Willow Cuttings 111 . 17 SY $ 49. 50 $ 5. 502.92
Total Cost: $ 9,190.46
Comments
Project was reviewed for 406 Hazard Mitigation and determination is made that mitigation is not feasible.
Attachments
User Date Document T Description Hard Copy File File Name Action
Reference
ANTHONY 04-15- Mitigation Version 1 - Version 1 - WELCO03 - View
SAWNEY 2014 Proposal HMP HMP.pdf(380. 14 kb)
Cost Estimate
Is this Project Worksheet for
(Preferred) Repair
Material Unit Unit of Subgrant Cost
Sequence Code and/or Unit Price Type Action
Description Quantity Measure Budget Class Estimate
*** Version 0 ***
Work Completed
Work
1 9999 ESTIMATE 1 LS 552,793.50 CONSTRUCTION Completed $ 552,793.50
Work To Be Completed
Work To
2 Estimate 1 LS 27,314.30 CONSTRUCTION Be $ 27.314.30
Completed
Direct Subgrantee Admin Cost
Direct INDIRECT Direct
3 9999 Admin cost 1 LS $ 1 .000.00 CHARGES Subgrantee $ 1 .000.00
Admin Cost
Total Cost : $ 581 ,107.80
Insurance Adjustments (Deductibles. Proceeds and Settlements) - 5900/5901
Unit Unit of Unit Subgrant Cost
Sequence Code Material and/or Description Quantity Measure Price Budget Type Estimate Action
Class
Total Cost : $ 0.00
Hazard Mitigation Proposal - 0909
Unit Unit of Unit Subgrant Cost
Sequence Code Material and/or Description Quantity Measure Price Budget Type Estimate Action
Class
*** Version 0 ***
I I I
hops://connect l .dhs.gov/emm ie/..Danalnfo=isource. Tema.net.SSL+dispatchDestination.do?. . . 4/30/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 15 of 34
1 9999 Rip rap 24 CY $ 83. 17 $ 1 .996.08
2 9999 Geotextile fabric 44 SY $ 3.07 $ 135.08
' Version 1 '
3 9999 Turff Reinforcement Mat 111 . 17 SY $ 14.00 $ 1 . 556.38
4 9999 Willow Cuttings 111 . 17 SY $ 49. 50 $ 5. 502.92
Total Cost : $ 9,190.46
Total Cost Estimate: $ 590,298.26
(Preferred Estimate Type + Insurance Adjustments + Hazard Mitigation Proposal)
Comments
Attachments
User Date Document Description Hard Copy File File Name Action
Type Reference
STEPHEN 02 Calculation DIRECT ADMIN WELCO03-WELD- DAC SHEET.pdf(7.84 View
SUHY 2�6-4 Sheet COSTS DAC kb)
_ 4145-WELCO03-
02 CALCULATION
STEPHEN24- Calculation CALCULATION WELD COUNTY- SPREADSHEET.pdf View
SUHY 2014 Sheet SPREADSHEET CALCULATION
SSPREADSHEET (73.51 kb)
KATHLEEN 02- Additional Material Estimates Weld County Material
BROWN 27- Information for Weld County Estimates.pdf(441 .64 View
2014 kb)
ERIC 02- Summary cost roll WELCO03
ALLEN 27- Map up and calculation CALCULATIONS.pdf View
2014 sheet (87.51 kb)
ERIC 02- EXCEL - Summary WELCO03
ALLEN 27- Miscellaneous cost roll up and CALCULATIONS.xlsx View
2014 calculation sheet (21 .83 kb)
Existing Insurance Information
Insurance Type Policy No. Bldg/Property Content Insurance Deductible Years
Amount Amount Amount Amount Required
Comments
Attachments
Comments and Attachments
Name of Section Comment Attachment
The applicant must notify the state if there are any changes in
Project Description the scope of work prior to starting the repairs. Failure to notify
the State Division of Emergency Management may jeopardize
receipt of federal funds.
1 PH0T0S.pdf
2 PHOTOS .pdf
https://connectl .dhs.gov/emm ie/. Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 4/30/2014
- - - - _ -
_At
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 16 of 34
3 PHOTOS .pdf
4 PHOTOS .pdf
5 PHOTOS.pdf
6 & 7 PHOTOS.pdf
8 PHOTOS.pdf
9 PHOTOS.pdf
10 PHOTOS.pdf
11 PHOTOS.pdf
12 PHOTOS.pdf
13 PHOTOS.pdf
14 PHOTOS.pdf
MAP1 .pdf
Damage Facilities MAP2.pdf
MAP3.pdf
MAP4.pdf
MAP5.pdf
MAP6.pdf
MAP7.pdf
MAP8.pdf
MAP9.pdf
MAP10.pdf
MAP11 .pdf
MAP 12.pdf
Version 1 - WELCO03 -
SOW.pdf
FIRMETTES.pdf
Special Considerations SC SHEET.pdf
Mitigation Project was reviewed for 406 Hazard Mitigation and Version 1 - WELCO03 -
determination is made that mitigation is not feasible. HMP.pdf
DAC SHEET.pdf
CALCULATION
SPREADSHEET.pdf
Weld County Material
Cost Estimate Estimates.pdf
WELCO03
CALCULATIONS.pdf
WELCO03
CALCULATIONS.xlsx
PW FRONT PAGE.pdf
Form 90-91 DDD-SOW.docx
Bundle Reference # (Amendment #) Date Awarded
PA-08-CO-4145-State-0043(42) 04-14-2014
Subgrant Application - FEMA Form 90-91
Note: The Effective Cost Share for this application is 75%
FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
PROJECT WORKSHEET
DISASTER PROJECT NO. PA ID NO. DATE CATEGORY
WELCO03 123-99123- 02-27-2014 C
FEMA 4145 - DR -CO 00
APPLICANT WELD (COUNTY) WORK COMPLETE AS OF
01-04-2014 95
Site 1 of 1
DAMAGED FACILITY
https://connect I .dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.tema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination .do?... 4/30/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 17 of 34
ROADS COUNTY: Weld
LOCATION: LATITUDE: LONGITUDE:
40.34905 -104.42233
40.35152 -104.42676
40.36257 -104.91708
PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00643(0): 40.3633 -104.9171
40.01478 -104.92361
COUNTY WIDE 40.01482 -104.90492
40.3596 -104.74974
Current Version: 40.36313 -104.75124
40.08739 -104.86764
****Version 1 **** 40.08939 -104.86766
40.08752 -104.86794
40.0876 -104.87928
40.16747 -104.92354
40.17516 -104.92327
40.39939 -104.64005
40.40955 -104.64018
40.3633 -104.9171
40.36342 -104.91982
40.07862 -104.8676
40.41396 -104.62574
40.41401 -104.62137
40.1095 -105.04328
40.10963 -105.028
40.39928 -104.64178
40.39943 -104.63076
40.36393 -104.91421
40.36405 -104.91706
40.01482 -104.90492
40.02916 -104.90489
40.01482 -104.90492
40.02916 -104.90489
40.07565 -104.86742
40.07984 -104.8674
40.08739 -104.86764
40.08939 -104.86766
40.1895 -104.88708
40.17525 -104.95578
40.17529 -104.95158
40.07708 -104.0516
40.0771 -104.05264
40.39943 -104.63076
40.41022 -104.63052
40.41053 -104.6287
40.41165 -104.62781
40.36393 -104.91421
40.36405 -104.91706
40.34116 -104.86822
40.34142 -104.88109
40.36405 -104.91705
40.36862 -104.91708
40.10955 -105.03193
40.07565 -104.86742
40.07984 -104.8674
40.0756 -104.05543
40.07916 -104.05263
40.36405 -104.91706
40.36862 -104.91708
40.35334 -104.7753
40.35437 -104.76805
40.08752 -104.86794
40.0876 -104.87928
40.18805 -104.8753
40.18869 -104.87872
DAMAGE DESCRIPTION AND DIMENSIONS:
PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00643(0):
County Roads, Category C, Permanent Road / Culvert Repair
Lat — 40.40955,
Long. -104.64018
During the incident period of September 11 , 2013 to September 30, 2013, Weld County. Colorado received heavy rainfall and debris in the
https://connectl .dhs.gov/emm ie/,Dana Info=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 4/30/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 18 of 34
creeks, streams and rivers which caused surface gravel removal and scour damage to numerous roads and bridges in Weld County. This
project worksheet addresses damages to 26 County road locations. 6 ditches (filled with sediment) that are part of the road locations and 2
culverts dislodged and damaged) locations for a total of 28 locations.
On December 2nd and 3rd, 2013, Kathleen Ruvarac, FEMA TAC Bridge Specialist, David Ray, FEMA Hazard Mitigation Specialist and Curtis
Hall and Travis Smith, Weld County employees, performed a site investigation at this location to document damages. The repairs were
substantially complete at the time of inspection.
Applicant provided photos of damaged sites which are included in this PW.
DAMAGE DESCRIPTION:
LOC 1 . 40.40955,-104.64018 to 40.39939,-104.64005, EM-Fern-18th-.0, on Fern Ave between E. 18th to E. 24th St. , length 3,677 LF X width
23 LF = 84571 SF X Depth 0. 14 FT /27 = 438.52 CY ABC Gravel.
LOC 2 . 40.39928,-104.64178 to 40.39943. -104.63076, EM-E24=US34-.0, on E. 24th St. between Btwn. US 34 & Hemlock . length 3.083 LF X
width 22 LF = 67826 SF X Depth 0.1 FT /27 = 251.21 CY ABC Gravel.
LOC 3 . 40.39943. -104.63076 to 40.41022.-104.63052, EM-Hem-18st-.0, on Hemlock between Btwn. E. 24th & E. 18th st , length 3,940 LF X
width 22 LF = 86680 SF X Depth 0.16 FT /27 = 513.66 CY ABC Gravel.
LOC 4 . 40.41053, -104.62870 to 40.41165,-104.62781 , EM-Hol-18st-.1 , on Holly between Btwn. E. 18th st. to End , length 415 LF X width 22
LF = 9130 SF X Depth 0.58 FT /27 = 196.13 CY ABC Gravel.
LOC 5 . 40.41396, -104.62574 to 40.41401, -104.62137, EM-HoI-18st-.1 , on Holly between Btwn. E. 18th st. to End , length 570 LF X width 22
LF = 12540 SF X Depth 0.07 FT /27 = 32.51 CY ABC Gravel.
LOC 6: Not Used - Visited Site but damages captured on another project worksheet.
LOC 7 . 40.35152,-104.42676 to 40.34905,-104.42233, EM-380-67-.3, on CR380 between From CR 67 & CR 69 , length 1 ,547 LF X width 26
LF = 40222 SF X Depth 0.47 FT /27 = 700.16 CY ABC Gravel.
LOC 8 . 40.36862,-104.91708 to 40.36405. -104.91706, EM-15.5-52-.0, on CR15.5 between Btwn. CR 52 & CR 54 , length 1 ,680 LF X width 24
LF = 40320 SF X Depth 0.25 FT /27 = 373.33 CY ABC Gravel.
LOC 8A 40.36862,-104.91708 to 40.36405, -104.91706. Ditches filled in with silt and gravel on CR15.5 between Btwn. CR 52 & CR 54 , length
3,360 LF
LOC 9 . 40.36405,-104.91706 to 40.36393,-104.91421 . EM-52-15.5-.02. on CR52 between Btwn. CR 15.5 to CR17 North , length 794 LF X
width 24 LF = 19056 SF X Depth 0.33 FT /27 = 232.91 CY ABC Gravel.
LOC 9A 40.36405,-104.91706 to 40.36393,-104.91421 , Ditches filled in with silt and gravel on CR52 between Btwn. CR 15.5 to CR17 North ,
length 1 ,588 LF
LOC 10 . 40.36342, -104.91982 to 40.36330.-104.91710, EM-52-15.5-.02, on CR52 between Btwn. 15 to 15.5 , length 1 ,100 LF X width 24 LF =
26400 SF X Depth 0.35 FT /27 = 342.22 CY ABC Gravel.
LOC 11 . 40.36330,-104.91710 to 40.36257,-104.91708, EM-15.5-52-.01 . on CR15.5 between Btwn. CR 50 to CR 52 , length 273 LF X width
24 LF = 6552 SF X Depth 0. 19 FT /27 = 46.11 CY ABC Gravel.
LOC 12 . 40.36313,-104.75124 to 40.35960,-104.74974, EM-44th-54st-.2. on 44th Ave. between Btwn. 49th St. & 54th St. Rd. , length 1 ,435 LF
X width 26 LF = 37310 SF X Depth 0.2 FT /27 = 276.37 CY ABC Gravel.
LOC 13 . 40.35437,-104.76805 to 40.35334,-104.77530, EM-54st-com, on 54th St. Rd. between Btwn. CR396 & 49th ave , length 2,062 LF X
width 28 LF = 57736 SF X Depth 0.17 FT /27 = 363.52 CY ABC Gravel.
LOC 14 . 40.34116,-104.86822 to 40.34142, -104.88109, EM-48.5-257-.80, on CR48.5 between Btwn. SH257 & CR 17 , length 3,600 LF X
width 22 LF = 79200 SF X Depth 0.06 FT /27 = 176.00 CY ABC Gravel.
LOC 15 . 40.07710. -104.05264 to 40.07708. -104.05160, EM-Brome-Westview, on Brome St. between From Buffalo Rd. to deadend , length
345 LF X width 22 LF = 7590 SF X Depth 0.17 FT /27 = 47.79 CY ABC Gravel.
LOC 16 . 40. 10950,-105.04328 to 40. 10963,-105.02800, EM-16.5-1-.0, on CR16.5 between Btwn. CR 1 & CR 3.25 , length 4,358 LF X width 25
LF = 108950 SF X Depth 0.27 FT /27 = 1,089.50 CY ABC Gravel.
LOC 17 . 40. 10955,-105.03193, EM-16.5-1-.0, on CR16.5 between AT INTERSECTION WITH CR 3.25 , length 325 LF X width 5 LF = 1625 SF
X Depth 0.4 FT /27 = 24.07 CY ABC Gravel.
LOC 18 . 40.01478,-104.92361 to 40.01482,-104.90492, EM-4-15-.0, on CR4 between Btwn. CR 15 & CR 17 length 5,247 LF X width 22 LF =
115434 SF X Depth 0.17 FT /27 = 726.81 CY ABC Gravel.
LOC 19 . 40.01482,-104.90492 to 40.02916,-104.90489, EM-CUL21-14-.1 , on CR21 between Btwn. CR 8 & CR14.5 , length 3,027 LF X width
24 LF = 72648 SF X Depth 0.03 FT /27 = 80.72 CY ABC Gravel.
LOC 19A 40.01482.-104.90492 to 40.02916,-104.90489, Ditches filled in with silt and gravel on CR21 between Btwn. CR 8 & CR14.5 , length
6,054 LF
LOC 20 . 40.07565, -104.86742, 40.07984, -104.86740, EM-CUL21-14-. 1 , on CR21 between Btwn. CR 8 & CR14.5 , length 727 LF X width 24
https://connectl .dhs.gov/emm ie/,DanaInfo=isourcelema.net,SSL+dispatch Destination.do?... 4/30/2014
a-
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 19 of 34
LF = 17448 SF X Depth 0.17 FT /27 = 109.86 CY ABC Gravel.
LOC 20A 40.07565, -104.86742, 40.07984, -104.86740, Ditches filled in with silt and gravel on CR21 between Btwn. CR 8 & CR14.5 , length
1 ,454 LF
LOC 21 . 40.07862, -104.86760, EM-CUL21-14-.1 , (18IN DIA CMP CULVERT, 40FT LENGTH) on CR21 between Btwn. CR 8 & CR14.5 ,
length 40 LF - No damages identified
LOC 22 . 40.08739,-104.86764 to 40.08939,-104.86766, EM-CUL21-14-. 1 . on CR21 between Btwn. CR 8 & CR14.5 . length 1,530 LF X width
10 LF = 15300 SF X Depth 0.08 FT /27 = 45.33 CY ABC Gravel.
LOC 22A 40.08739.-104.86764 to 40.08939,-104.86766, Ditches filled in with silt and gravel on CR21 between Btwn. CR 8 & CR14.5 , length
3,060
LOC 23 . 40.08752,-104.86794 to 40.08760,-104.87928. EM-14-19-.5, on CR14 between Btwn. CR 19 & CR 21 , length 3,175 LF X width 10 LF
= 31750 SF X Depth 0.65 FT /27 = 764.35 CY ABC Gravel.
LOC 23A 40.08752,-104.86794 to 40.08760,-104.87928, Ditches filled in with silt and gravel on CR14 between Btwn. CR 19 & CR 21 , length
6,350
LOC 24 . 40. 18950,-104.88708, EM-CUL28-17-.6, (15lN DIA CMP CULVERT, 40FT LENGTH) on CR28 between Btwn. CR 15.75 & CR 19 ,
length 40 LF
LOC 25 . 40.17529,-104.95158 to 40.17525,-104.95578, EM-26-11 .5-.2, on CR26 between Btwn. CR 11.5 & CR 13 , length 1 ,500 LF X width
29 LF = 43,500SF X Depth 0.25 FT /27 = 402.78 CY ABC Gravel.
LOC 26 . 40. 16747,-104.92354 to 40. 17516,-104.92327, EM-15-24-0. on CR15 between Btwn. CR 24 & CR 26 , length 2,807 LF X width 23 LF
= 64561 SF X Depth 0.17 FT /27 = 406.50 CY ABC Gravel.
LOC 27 . 40. 18869,-104.87872 to 40.18805,-104.87530. EM-28-21-.4, on CR28 between Btwn. CR 19 & CR 21 . length 2,717 LF X width 24 LF
= 65208 SF X Depth 0.06 FT /27 = 144.91 CY ABC Gravel.
LOC 28 . 40.07560, -104.05543 to 40.07916, -104.05263, EM-Buffalo-Westview, on Buffalo St. between Btwn. E.County Line Rd. & Westview
Rd. , length 2,070 LF X width 22 LF = 45540 SF X Depth 0.17 FT /27 = 286.73 CY ABC Gravel.
LOC 29 . 40.07918, -104.05542 to 40.07916, -104.05263, EM-Westview-Westview, on Westview St. between Btwn. E.County Line Rd. &
Buffalo Rd. , length 800 LF X width 22 LF = 17600 SF X Depth 0.17 FT /27 = 110.81 CY ABC Gravel.
Total gravel 8,048.91CY, total length of ditches 21 ,866LF and total culverts CMP 80FT.
Current Version:
****Version 1 ****
SCOPE OF WORK:
PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00643(0):
WORK COMPLETED:
Applicant will use Force Account and Contract Services to restore damaged roads to pre-disaster condition, function, capacity and use.
Note: Rounding errors may exist. The quantities show are rounded to the whole number, however, the cost is correctly calculated. (See
attached calculation spreadsheet.)
LOC 1 : Repair EM-Fern-18th-.0 on Fern Ave between E. 18th to E. 24th St. , 438.52 CY x 1.82 (Conversion Factor CY ABC Class 6 Material to
Tons = 798.10 tons x $33.70/ton (CDOT Item Number 304-06000 Aggregate Base Course Class 6 x 2 due to economies of scale as compared
with number of CDOT annual projects) = $26,895.96.
(Above note where applicable applies to following locations).
LOC 2: Repair EM-E24=US34-.0 on E. 24th St. between Btwn. US 34 & Hemlock , 251.21 CY X 1 .82 = 457.20 TONS X $33.70 /TON =
$15,407.56 ABC Gravel CDOT 304-06000
LOC 3: Repair EM-Hem-18st-.0 on Hemlock between Btwn. E. 24th & E. 18th st , 513.66 CY X 1 .82 = 934.86 TONS X $33.70 /TON =
$31 ,504.78 ABC Gravel CDOT 304-06000
LOC 4: Repair EM-Hol-18st-. 1 on Holly between Btwn. E. 18th st. to End , 196.13 CY X 1.82 = 356.95 TONS X $33.70 /TON = $12,029.19 ABC
Gravel CDOT 304-06000
LOC 5: Repair EM-Hol-last-. 1 on Holly between Btwn. E. 18th st. to End , 32.51 CY X 1.82 = 59. 17 TONS X $33.70 /TON = $1,994.04 ABC
Gravel CDOT 304-06000
LOC 6: NOT USED. Costs captured on another PW. Deleted as to avoid any duplication of benefits.
LOC 7: Repair EM-380-67-.3 on CR380 between From CR 67 & CR 69 , 700. 16 CY X 1 .82 = 1 ,274.29 TONS X $33.70 /TON = $42,943.66 ABC
Gravel CDOT 304-06000
https://connect l .dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 4/30/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 20 of 34
LOC 8: Repair EM-15.5-52-.0 on CR15.5 between Btwn. CR 52 & CR 54 , 373.33 CY X 1 .82 = 679.47 TONS X $33.70 /TON = $22,898.03 ABC
Gravel CDOT 304-06000
LOC 8A: Repair Regrade ditches on CR15.5 between Btwn. CR 52 & CR 54 , 3,360.00 FT X $3.40 /FT = $11 ,424.00 Clean ditch FEMA 3070
LOC 9: Repair EM-52-15.5-.02 on CR52 between Btwn. CR 15.5 to CR17 North , 232.91 CY X 1 .82 = 423.89 TONS X $33.70 /TON =
$14,285.10 ABC Gravel CDOT 304-06000
LOC 9A: Repair Regrade ditches on CR52 between Btwn. CR 15.5 to CR17 North , 1 ,588.00 FT X $3.40 /FT = $5,399.20 Clean ditch FEMA
3070
LOC 10: Repair EM-52-15.5-.02 on CR52 between Btwn. 15 to 15.5 , 342.22 CY X 1 .82 = 622.84 TONS X $33.70 /TON = $20,989.86 ABC
Gravel CDOT 304-06000
LOC 11 : Repair EM-15.5-52-.01 on CR15.5 between Btwn. CR 50 to CR 52 , 46.11 CY X 1.82 = 83.91 TONS X $33.70 /TON = $2,827.91 ABC
Gravel CDOT 304-06000
LOC 12: Repair EM-44th-54st-.2 on 44th Ave. between Btwn. 49th St. & 54th St. Rd. , 276.37 CY X 1.82 = 502.99 TONS X $33.70 /TON =
$16,950.90 ABC Gravel CDOT 304-06000
LOC 13: Repair EM-54st-com on 54th St. Rd. between Btwn. CR396 & 49th ave , 363.52 CY X 1.82 = 661 .61 TONS X $33.70 /TON =
$22,296.32 ABC Gravel CDOT 304-06000
LOC 14: Repair EM-48.5-257-.80 on CR48.5 between Btwn. SH257 & CR 17 , 176.00 CY X 1 .82 = 320.32 TONS X $33.70 /TON = $10,794.78
ABC Gravel CDOT 304-06000
LOC 16: Repair EM-16.5-1-.0 on CR16.5 between Btwn. CR 1 & CR 3.25 . 1 ,089.50 CY X 1 .82 = 1 ,982.89 TONS X $33.70 /TON = $66,823.39
ABC Gravel CDOT 304-06000
LOC 17: Repair EM-16.5-1-.0 on CR16.5 between AT INTERSECTION WITH CR 3.25 , 24.07 CY X 1 .82 = 43.81 TONS X $33.70 /TON =
$1 ,476.56 ABC Gravel CDOT 304-06000
LOC 18: Repair EM-4-15-.0 on CR4 between Btwn. CR 15 & CR 17 , 726.81 CY X 1 .82 = 1 ,322.79 TONS X $33.70 /TON = $44,577.96 ABC
Gravel CDOT 304-06000
LOC 19: Repair EM-CUL21-14-.1 on CR21 between Btwn. CR 8 & CR14.5 , 80.72 CY X 1 .82 = 146.91 TONS X $33.70 /TON = $4.950.88 ABC
Gravel CDOT 304-06000
LOC 19A: Repair Regrade ditches on CR21 between Btwn. CR 8 & CR14.5 , 6,054.00 FT X $3.40 /FT = $20,583.60 Clean ditch FEMA Cost
Code 3070
LOC 20: Repair EM-CUL21-14-.1 on CR21 between Btwn. CR 8 & CR14.5 , 109.86 CY X 1 .82 = 199.94 TONS X $33.70 /TON = $6,738.02 ABC
Gravel CDOT 304-06000
LOC 20A: Repair Regrade ditches on CR21 between Btwn. CR8 & CR14.5 , 1 ,454.00 FT X $3.40 /FT = $4,943.60 Clean ditch FEMA Cost
Code 3070
LOC 21 : EM-CUL21-14-. 1, (181N DIA CMP CULVERT, 40FT LENGTH) on CR21 between Btwn. CR8 & CR14.5 , 40.00 FT X $48.49 /FT =
$1 .939.60 18IN CMP CDOT 603-10180 (Applicant states no damages to this site) See Project Note #10.
LOC 22: Repair EM-CUL21-14-.1 on CR21 between Btwn. CR 8 & CR14.5 . 45.33 CY X 1 .82 = 82.51 TONS X $33.70 /TON = $2,780.47 ABC
Gravel CDOT 304-06000
LOC 22A: Repair Regrade ditches on CR21 between Btwn. CR 8 & CR14.5 . 3,060.00 FT X $3.40 /FT = $10,404.00 Clean ditch FEMA Cost
Code 3070
LOC 23: Repair EM-14-19-.5 on CR14 between Btwn. CR 19 & CR 21 , 764.35 CY X 1.82 = 1 ,391.12 TONS X $33.70 /TON = $46,880.76 ABC
Gravel CDOT 304-06000
LOC 23A: Repair Regrade ditches on CR14 between Btwn. CR 19 & CR 21 , 6,350.00 FT X $3.40 /FT = $21 .590.00 Clean ditch FEMA Cost
Code 3070
LOC 24: Repair EM-CUL28-17-.6, (151N DIA CMP CULVERT, 40FT LENGTH) on CR28 between Btwn. CR 15.75 & CR 19 . 40.00 FT X
$48.49 /FT = $1 ,939.60 18IN CMP CDOT 603-10180
LOC 25: Repair EM-26-11.5-.2 on CR26 between Btwn. CR 11.5 & CR 13. 402.78 CY X 1.82 = 733.06 TONS X $33.70 /TON = $24,704.11.
ABC Gravel CDOT 304-06000
LOC 26: Repair EM-15-24-0 on CR15 between Btwn. CR 24 & CR 26 , 406.50 CY X 1.82 = 739.82 TONS X $33.70 /TON = $24,931.98 ABC
Gravel CDOT 304-06000
LOC 27: Repair EM-28-21-.4 on CR28 between Btwn. CR 19 & CR 21 , 144.91 CY X 1.82 = 263.73 TONS X $33.70 /TON = $8,887.71 ABC
Gravel CDOT 304-06000
Total tons of aggregate = 14.892.71TONS, total length of ditches = 21 .866FT, total length of culverts = 80FT, total costs = $580, 107.80.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED:
https://connectl .dhs.gov/emm ie/,Danal nfo=isourcelema.net.SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 4/30/2014
- - -
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 21 of 34
LOC 15: Repair EM-Brome-Westview on Brome St. between From Buffalo Rd. to deadend , 47.79 CY X 1 .82 = 86.98 TONS X $33.70 /TON =
$2,931.08 ABC Gravel CDOT 304-06000
LOC 28: Repair EM-Buffalo-Westview on Buffalo St. between Btwn. E.County Line Rd. & Westview Rd. , 286.73 CY X 1.82 = 521 .85 TONS X
$33.70 /TON = $17,586.50 ABC Gravel CDOT 304-06000
LOC 29: Repair EM-Westview-Westview on Westview St. between Btwn. E.County Line Rd. & Buffalo Rd., 110.81 CY X 1 .82 = 201 .68 TONS X
$33.70 /TON = $6,796.72 ABC Gravel CDOT 304-06000
Project Notes:
1. During repair or reconstruction, applicant may incur additional costs related to clearing and grubbing, placement of topsoil, erosion and
sedimentation control, sanitary facilities, dewatering, mobilization and flagging/traffic control. Such costs are generally addressed in the "in-
place" unit costs of repair or reconstruction items, and not specifically addressed in the Scope of Work. However, if a project requires an
extraordinary use of any such items, to where a specific reference in the PW should be considered, applicant is advised to contract Colorado
Department of Emergency Management requesting a revision to the PWs Scope of Work.
2. Applicant has completed a substantial percentage of the work but will not have cost data available within the fourteen day Pocket Guide
rule. Per Field Operations Pocket Guide. Section 7. Cost Estimates, Page 26, "If the applicant has not produced cost data within two weeks of
the site inspection, the Project Specialist will prepare the PW on the basis of an estimate for the work accomplished". Applicant, CO State
representative and FEMA personnel jointly conducted all inspections and agreed to use CDOT costs for in-place costs to derive estimates on
this project worksheet. Applicant understands that all actual support documentation. invoices, FA records, contract and proof of payment will be
required for final reconciliation and or closeout process. Attached is the CDOT average in-place cost for materials.
3. The Applicant will notify FEMA and the State of their intent to perform permanent work related to this site before any work commences in
the field. Failure to do so may jeopardize the sub-grant for permanent work related to the work in this sub-grant.
4. Pursuant to 44 CFR 13.42, Grantees and Subgrantees are required to retain records, including source documentation, to support
expenditures/costs incurred against the grant award, for 3 years from the date of submission to FEMA of the final Financial Status Report.
5. The applicant must obtain all required federal, state, and local permits prior to the commencement of work.
6. The subgrantee is requesting direct administrative costs that are directly chargeable to this specific project. Associated eligible work is
related to administration of the PA project only and in accordance with 44 CFR 13.22. These costs are treated consistently and uniformly as
direct costs in all federal awards and other subgrantee activities and are not included in any approved indirect costs.
7. Project was reviewed for 406 Hazard Mitigation and is HMP is attached.
8. The applicant is aware that all projects are subject to an insurance review as stated in 44 C.F.R. Sections 206.252 and 206.253. If
applicable, an insurance determination will be made either as anticipated proceeds or actual proceeds in accordance with the applicants
insurance policy that may affect the total amount of the project.
9. The applicant is required to adhere to State and Federal Government Procurement rules and regulations and maintain adequate records to
support the basis for all purchasing of goods and materials and contracting services for projects approved under the Public Assistance program,
as stated in 44 CFR 13.36. The applicant has advised they have followed their normal procurement procedures.
10. After this PW was entered into EMMIE, the applicant requested that changes be made to the Damage Description and Scope of Work for
Sites 21 and 24. Site 21 did not have any damages and the estimated cost for $1 .939.60 will remain part of the original estimated cost of
$580, 107.80 as actual costs of repairs will be captured at close out for this large project. Sites 15, 28 and 29 were identified as not having any
work performed to date. Estimated costs for the sites will remain the same as stated.
Current Version:
****Version 1 *'
This Addendum is being written to capture damages to CR15.5 consisting of eroded roadway shoulder that was not captured during the initial
field survey. It was identified by the Applicant during their review of PW WELCO03. As a measure to prevent future erosion, the Applicant is
requesting HMP to stabilize the side slopes consisting of turf reinforcing mat and willow cuttings.
In order to rebuild eroded roadway shoulder that was washed out during the disaster, the Applicant is requesting at Location 8, CR 15.5,
(40.36548, -104.91711 ) the restoration of 145FT X 24FT X 4FT / 27 = 515.56CY of embankment material (common borrow) at $10.00/CY
(CDOT 203-00062) = $5,155.56 and provide traffic control for 2 days at $1 ,000.00/day (CDOT estimate) = $2,000.00. TOTAL $7,155.56.
Does the Scope of Work change the pre-disaster
conditions at the site? Yes No Special Considerations included? Yes No
Hazard Mitigation proposal included? Yes No Is there insurance coverage on this facility? Yes No
PROJECT COST
ITEM CODE NARRATIVE QUANTITY/UNIT UNIT PRICE COST
*** Version 0 ***
Work Completed
1 9999 ESTIMATE 1 /LS $ 552,793.50 $ 552,793.50
Work To Be Completed
2 9999 Estimate 1 /LS $ 27,314.30 $ 27,314.30
Direct Subgrantee Admin Cost
3 9999 Direct Admin cost 1 /LS $ 1 ,000.00 $ 1 ,000.00
4 0909 Hazard Mitigation Proposal 1 /LS $ 9, 190.46 $ 9, 190.46
https://connect I .dhs.gov/emm ie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 4/30/2014
sap
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 22 of 34
TOTAL COST $ 590,298.26
PREPARED BY STEPHEN SUHY TITLE PROJECT SPECIALIST SIGNATURE
APPLICANT REP Roy RudisiII TITLE Director - OEM SIGNATURE
WELD (COUNTY) : PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00643
Conditions Information
Review Name Condition Type Condition Name Description Monitored Status
POST-CONSTRUCTION: 17.
Upon project completion.
revegetate all disturbed areas with
native shrubs. trees. and grasses.
a. Rip compacted access routes
prior to replanting with native
vegetation. b. Fill and reseed with
weed free material and native
seed mixtures. c. Consult the
Endangered Service before finalizing a seed
Final Review Other (EHP) Species Act and plant list. 18. Bury riprap. then No Approved
(ESA) plant with native riparian
vegetation. 19. Rehabilitate
adjacent habitats impacted by
floodwaters to restore connectivity
and prevent future impacts from
erosion or sedimentation. 20.
Consider monitoring the
revegetated areas for success.
The Service can help establish
success criteria during the
consultation process.
This review does not address all
federal. state and local
requirements. Acceptance of
federal funding requires recipient
Final Review Other (EHP) Standard to comply with all federal. state No Approved
Condition #2 and local laws. Failure to obtain all pp
appropriate federal. state and local
environmental permits and
clearances may jeopardize federal
funding.
Any change to the approved
Standard scope of work will require re-
Final Review Other (EHP) Condition #1 evaluation for compliance with No Approved
NEPA and other Laws and
Executive Orders.
POST-CONSTRUCTION: 17.
Upon project completion.
revegetate all disturbed areas with
native shrubs. trees. and grasses.
a. Rip compacted access routes
prior to replanting with native
vegetation. b. Fill and reseed with
weed free material and native
seed mixtures. c. Consult the
Service before finalizing a seed
Endangered and plant list. 18. Bury riprap. then
littps://connectl .dhs.gov/emm ie/,Danainfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatch Destination.do?... 4/30/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 23 of 34
Species Act plant with native riparian
(ESA) vegetation. 19. Rehabilitate
adjacent habitats impacted by
floodwaters to restore connectivity
and prevent future impacts from
Final Review Other (EHP) erosion or sedimentation. 20. No Approved
Consider monitoring the
revegetated areas for success.
The Service can help establish
success criteria during the
consultation process.
PRE-CONSTRUCTION DESIGN :
1 . Design the project to avoid and
minimize the permanent and
temporary impacts to riparian and
adjacent upland habitats. a.
Before construction. identify and
prioritize riparian and adjacent
upland habitats within the project
area. Design the project so that it
avoids these habitats whenever
possible. b. Minimize the amount
of concrete, riprap. bridge
footings. and other "hard,"
impermeable engineering features
within the stream channel and
riparian or adjacent upland
habitats. c. Use bioengineering
techniques to stabilize stream
banks. d. Minimize the number
and footprint of access routes.
staging areas. and work areas. e.
Locate access routes. staging
areas. and work areas within
previously disturbed or modified
Endangered non-habitat areas. f. Maintain
Final Review Other (EHP) Species Act habitat connectivity under bridges No Approved
(ESA) or through culverts by installing
ledges or dry culverts adjacent to
the culverts with water flow. g.
Avoid fragmenting linear riparian
corridors. 2. Install limits of work
fencing (e.g. . orange barrier
netting or silt fencing). signage. or
other visible markers to delineate
access routes and the project area
from habitats. Use this fencing to
enforce no-entry zones. 3. Hold a
preconstruction briefing for onsite
personnel to explain the limits of
work and other conservation
measures. 4. Follow regional
stormwater guidelines and design
best management practices
(BMPs) to control contamination.
erosion . and sedimentation, such
as silt fences. silt basins, gravel
bags. and other controls needed
to stabilize soils in denuded or
graded areas. during and after
construction. 5. Locate utilities
along existing road corridors. and
https://connect 1 .dhs.gov/emm ie/,Danalnfo=isource.tema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination .do?.. . 4/30/2014
t
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 24 of 34
if possible. within the roadway or
road shoulder. a. Bury overhead
utilities whenever possible. b.
Directionally bore utilities and
pipes underneath habitats. 6.
Develop and implement a habitat
restoration plan that addresses
site preparation. planting
techniques. control of non-native
weeds. native seed mixtures. and
post-construction monitoring.
The applicant should implement
appropriate FWS conservation
measures identified in the
Emergency Consultation between
FEMA and USFWS. dated
September 24. 2013. to the extent
Endangered possible: including a post-
Final Review Other (EHP) Species Act construction estimate of the No Approved
(ESA) amount of habitat affected by the
emergency response, an
evaluation of how conservation
recommendations were
implemented. and the results of
implementation in minimizing
adverse effects.
PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION: 7.
Contact the Service immediately
by telephone at (303) 236-4773 if
a Preble's is found alive, dead,
injured, or hibernating within the
project area. Please also contact
the Service if any other listed
species are found within the
project area. 8. To the maximum
extent practicable. limit disturbing
(e.g. . crushing. trampling) or
removing (e.g. . cutting, clearing)
all vegetation . such as willows,
trees. shrubs, and grasses within
riparian and adjacent upland
habitats. a. Restrict the temporary
or permanent removal of
vegetation to the footprint of the
project area. b. Minimize the use
of heavy machinery and use
smaller equipment when possible.
c. Soil compaction : Temporarily
line access routes with geotextiles
or other materials. especially in
wet. unstable soils to protect roots
and the seed bank. 9. Use the
attached table to track the acres or
square feet of riparian and upland
habitats temporarily or
permanently affected by the
response activities. a. Temporary
Impacts: Native vegetation and
habitats will reestablish following
rehabilitation (e.g. , access route
that is rehabilitated with native.
I
https://connect l .dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net.SSL+dispatch Destination.do?... 4/30/20 14
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 25 of 34
weed-free seeds and plants). b.
Permanent Impacts: Riparian or
upland habitats will not return as a
result of project activities (e.g. .
road surface. concrete footings)
10. Track the volumes of any
water from onsite sources stored
or used for dust abatement. soil
compaction. concrete mixing . or
other activities. 11 . Locate, store.
stage, operate, and refuel
equipment outside of riparian or
adjacent upland habitats. a.
Operate equipment from
previously disturbed or modified
roadbeds or road shoulders above
the riparian habitats. b. Limit the
number of entrance and exit points
leading into the project area. c.
Stockpile topsoil and debris
outside the riparian corridor and
protect from stream flows or
runoff. 12. During the Preble's
active season (May 1 through
November 1 ), work only during
daylight hours to avoid disrupting
Preble's nocturnal activities. 13.
Promptly remove waste to
Endangered minimize site disturbance and
Final Review Other (EHP) Species Act avoid attracting predators. 14. No Approved
(ESA) Cover exposed holes or piles of
loose dirt with boards. tarps, or
other materials to prevent
entrapment. 15. Use best
management practices (BMPs) to
limit construction-related
disturbance, such as soil
compaction. erosion. and
sedimentation. and to prevent the
spread of invasive weeds: a. Soil
compaction: Establish one access
route for workers, vehicles. and
machinery, preferably along a
previously disturbed surface or
route. b. Soil compaction:
Temporarily line access routes
with geotextiles or other materials.
especially in wet. unstable soils. c.
Weed control: Wash and inspect
vehicles and equipment before
entering or leaving the project
area so that they are free of
noxious weed seeds and plant
parts. d. Weed control: Use only
weed free certified materials.
including gravel, sand. top soil.
seed. and mulch. 16. Complete
construction before beginning
restoration or enhancement
activities.
PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION : 7.
Contact the Service immediately
https://connect l .dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination .do?... 4/30/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 26 of 34
by telephone at (303) 236-4773 if
a Preble's is found alive. dead,
injured , or hibernating within the
project area. Please also contact
the Service if any other listed
species are found within the
project area. 8. To the maximum
extent practicable. limit disturbing
(e.g. . crushing. trampling) or
removing (e.g. , cutting. clearing)
all vegetation. such as willows,
trees, shrubs. and grasses within
riparian and adjacent upland
habitats. a. Restrict the temporary
or permanent removal of
vegetation to the footprint of the
project area. b. Minimize the use
of heavy machinery and use
smaller equipment when possible.
c. Soil compaction: Temporarily
line access routes with geotextiles
or other materials, especially in
wet. unstable soils to protect roots
and the seed bank. 9. Use the
attached table to track the acres or
square feet of riparian and upland
habitats temporarily or
permanently affected by the
response activities. a. Temporary
Endangered Impacts: Native vegetation and
Final Review Other (EHP) Species Act habitats will reestablish following No Approved
(ESA) rehabilitation (e.g. , access route
that is rehabilitated with native.
weed-free seeds and plants). b.
Permanent Impacts: Riparian or
upland habitats will not return as a
result of project activities (e.g. .
road surface. concrete footings)
10. Track the volumes of any
water from onsite sources stored
or used for dust abatement. soil
compaction. concrete mixing. or
other activities. 11 . Locate. store.
stage, operate. and refuel
equipment outside of riparian or
adjacent upland habitats. a.
Operate equipment from
previously disturbed or modified
roadbeds or road shoulders above
the riparian habitats. b. Limit the
number of entrance and exit points
leading into the project area. c.
Stockpile topsoil and debris
outside the riparian corridor and
protect from stream flows or
runoff. 12. During the Preble's
active season ( May 1 through
November 1 ) , work only during
daylight hours to avoid disrupting
Preble's nocturnal activities. 13.
Promptly remove waste to
minimize site disturbance and
https://connect l .dhs.gov/emm ie/,Dana1n to=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatch Destination .do?... 4/30/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 27 of 34
avoid attracting predators. 14.
Cover exposed holes or piles of
loose dirt with boards. tarps, or
other materials to prevent
entrapment. 15. Use best
management practices (BMPs) to
limit construction-related
disturbance, such as soil
compaction. erosion. and
sedimentation. and to prevent the
spread of invasive weeds: a. Soil
compaction: Establish one access
route for workers, vehicles. and
machinery, preferably along a
previously disturbed surface or
route. b. Soil compaction :
Temporarily line access routes
with geotextiles or other materials..
especially in wet, unstable soils. c.
Weed control: Wash and inspect
vehicles and equipment before
entering or leaving the project
area so that they are free of
noxious weed seeds and plant
parts. d. Weed control: Use only
weed free certified materials.
including gravel. sand. top soil,
seed. and mulch. 16. Complete
construction before beginning
restoration or enhancement
activities.
The applicant should implement
appropriate FWS conservation
measures identified in the
Emergency Consultation between
FEMA and USFWS. dated
September 24, 2013. to the extent
Endangered possible: including a post-
Final Review Other (EHP) Species Act construction estimate of the No Approved
(ESA) amount of habitat affected by the
emergency response, an
evaluation of how conservation
recommendations were
implemented. and the results of
implementation in minimizing
adverse effects.
PRE-CONSTRUCTION DESIGN :
1 . Design the project to avoid and
minimize the permanent and
temporary impacts to riparian and
adjacent upland habitats. a.
Before construction . identify and
prioritize riparian and adjacent
upland habitats within the project
area. Design the project so that it
avoids these habitats whenever
possible. b. Minimize the amount
of concrete. riprap. bridge
footings. and other "hard."
impermeable engineering features
within the stream channel and
https://connect l .dhs.gov/emm ie/,Danal rifo=isource. fema.net,SSL+dispatch Destination.do?. . . 4/30/20 14
- t
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 28 of 34
riparian or adjacent upland
habitats. c. Use bioengineering
techniques to stabilize stream
banks. d. Minimize the number
and footprint of access routes,
staging areas. and work areas. e.
Locate access routes. staging
areas. and work areas within
previously disturbed or modified
non-habitat areas. f. Maintain
habitat connectivity under bridges
or through culverts by installing
ledges or dry culverts adjacent to
the culverts with water flow. g.
Avoid fragmenting linear riparian
corridors. 2. Install limits of work
fencing (e.g. . orange barrier
netting or silt fencing) . signage. or
other visible markers to delineate
access routes and the project area
from habitats. Use this fencing to
enforce no-entry zones. 3. Hold a
Endangered preconstruction briefing for onsite
Final Review Other (EHP) Species Act personnel to explain the limits of No Approved
(ESA) work and other conservation
measures. 4. Follow regional
stormwater guidelines and design
best management practices
(BMPs) to control contamination.
erosion. and sedimentation , such
as silt fences. silt basins. gravel
bags, and other controls needed
to stabilize soils in denuded or
graded areas. during and after
construction. 5. Locate utilities
along existing road corridors. and
if possible. within the roadway or
road shoulder. a. Bury overhead
utilities whenever possible. b.
Directionally bore utilities and
pipes underneath habitats. 6.
Develop and implement a habitat
• restoration plan that addresses
site preparation. planting
techniques. control of non-native
weeds. native seed mixtures. and
post-construction monitoring.
If ground disturbing activities occur
during construction. applicant will
monitor ground disturbance and if
Final Review Other (EHP) Standard any potential archeological No Approved
Condition #3 resources are discovered. will pp
immediately cease construction in
that area and notify the State and
FEMA.
Any change to the approved
Standard scope of work will require re-
Final Review Other (EHP) Condition #1 evaluation for compliance with No Approved
NEPA and other Laws and
Executive Orders.
This review does not address all
I
https://connectl .dhs.gov/emm ie/,Danaln fo=isource. lema.net,SSL+dispatch Destination.do?... 4/30/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 29 of 34
federal , state and local
requirements. Acceptance of
federal funding requires recipient
Standard to comply with all federal. state
Final Review Other (EHP) Condition #2 and local laws. Failure to obtain all No Approved
appropriate federal, state and local
environmental permits and
clearances may jeopardize federal
funding.
If ground disturbing activities occur
during construction. applicant will
monitor ground disturbance and if
Final Review Other (EHP) Standard any potential archeological No Approved
Condition #3 resources are discovered . will pp
immediately cease construction in
that area and notify the State and
FEMA.
If ground disturbing activities occur
during construction , applicant will
monitor ground disturbance and if
EHP Review Other (EHP)
Standard any potential archeological
Condition #3 resources are discovered. will No Recommended
immediately cease construction in
that area and notify the State and
FEMA.
This review does not address all
federal. state and local
requirements. Acceptance of
federal funding requires recipient
EHP Review Other EHP Standard to comply with all federal. state
( Condition #2 and local laws. Failure to obtain all No Recommended
appropriate federal, state and local
environmental permits and
clearances may jeopardize federal
funding.
Any change to the approved
Standard scope of work will require re-
EHP Review Other (EHP) Condition #1 evaluation for compliance with No Recommended
NEPA and other Laws and
Executive Orders.
POST-CONSTRUCTION: 17.
Upon project completion.
revegetate all disturbed areas with
native shrubs. trees. and grasses.
a. Rip compacted access routes
prior to replanting with native
vegetation . b. Fill and reseed with
weed free material and native
Endangered seed mixtures. c. Consult the
EHP Review Other (EHP) Species Act Service before finalizing a seed No Recommended
(ESA) and plant list. 18. Bury riprap. then
plant with native riparian
vegetation. 19. Rehabilitate
adjacent habitats impacted by
floodwaters to restore connectivity
and prevent future impacts from
erosion or sedimentation. 20.
Consider monitoring the
revegetated areas for success.
The Service can help establish
https://connect I .dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource. tei»a.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 4/30/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 30 of 34
success criteria during the
consultation process.
PRE-CONSTRUCTION DESIGN:
1 . Design the project to avoid and
minimize the permanent and
temporary impacts to riparian and
adjacent upland habitats. a.
Before construction, identify and
prioritize riparian and adjacent
upland habitats within the project
area. Design the project so that it
avoids these habitats whenever
possible. b. Minimize the amount
of concrete, riprap. bridge
footings. and other "hard."
impermeable engineering features
within the stream channel and
riparian or adjacent upland
habitats. c. Use bioengineering
techniques to stabilize stream
banks. d. Minimize the number
and footprint of access routes..
staging areas. and work areas. e.
Locate access routes, staging
areas. and work areas within
previously disturbed or modified
non-habitat areas. f. Maintain
habitat connectivity under bridges
or through culverts by installing
ledges or dry culverts adjacent to
Endangered the culverts with water flow. g.
EHP Review Other (EHP) Species Act Avoid fragmenting linear riparian No Recommended
(ESA) corridors. 2. Install limits of work
fencing (e.g. . orange barrier
netting or silt fencing). signage. or
other visible markers to delineate
access routes and the project area
from habitats. Use this fencing to
enforce no-entry zones. 3. Hold a
preconstruction briefing for onsite
personnel to explain the limits of
work and other conservation
measures. 4. Follow regional
stormwater guidelines and design
best management practices
(BMPs) to control contamination.
erosion. and sedimentation, such
as silt fences, silt basins, gravel
bags, and other controls needed
to stabilize soils in denuded or
graded areas. during and after
construction. 5. Locate utilities
along existing road corridors. and
if possible. within the roadway or
road shoulder. a. Bury overhead
utilities whenever possible. b.
Directionally bore utilities and
pipes underneath habitats. 6.
Develop and implement a habitat
restoration plan that addresses
site preparation . planting
techniques. control of non-native
https://connectl .dhs.gov/em m ie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatc h Destination.do?... 4/30/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 31 of 34
weeds. native seed mixtures. and
post-construction monitoring.
The applicant should implement
appropriate FWS conservation
measures identified in the
Emergency Consultation between
FEMA and USFWS. dated
September 24. 2013. to the extent
Endangered possible: including a post-
EHP Review Other (EHP) Species Act construction estimate of the No Recommended
(ESA) amount of habitat affected by the
emergency response. an
evaluation of how conservation
recommendations were
implemented. and the results of
implementation in minimizing
adverse effects.
PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION: 7.
Contact the Service immediately
by telephone at (303) 236-4773 if
a Preble's is found alive, dead,
injured. or hibernating within the
project area. Please also contact
the Service if any other listed
species are found within the
project area. 8. To the maximum
extent practicable. limit disturbing
(e.g. , crushing. trampling) or
removing (e.g. . cutting . clearing)
all vegetation, such as willows,
trees. shrubs, and grasses within
riparian and adjacent upland
habitats. a. Restrict the temporary
or permanent removal of
vegetation to the footprint of the
project area. b. Minimize the use
of heavy machinery and use
smaller equipment when possible.
c. Soil compaction: Temporarily
line access routes with geotextiles
or other materials. especially in
wet. unstable soils to protect roots
and the seed bank. 9. Use the
attached table to track the acres or
square feet of riparian and upland
habitats temporarily or
permanently affected by the
response activities. a. Temporary
Impacts: Native vegetation and
habitats will reestablish following
rehabilitation (e.g. . access route
that is rehabilitated with native.
weed-free seeds and plants). b.
Permanent Impacts: Riparian or
upland habitats will not return as a
result of project activities (e.g. .
road surface. concrete footings)
10. Track the volumes of any
water from onsite sources stored
or used for dust abatement. soil
compaction. concrete mixing . or
https://connectl .dhs.gov/emm ie/.Danalnfo=isource.fema.net.SSL+dispatch Destination.do?... 4/30/2014
a t
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 32 of 34
other activities. 11 . Locate. store.
stage. operate. and refuel
equipment outside of riparian or
adjacent upland habitats. a.
Operate equipment from
previously disturbed or modified
roadbeds or road shoulders above
the riparian habitats. b. Limit the
number of entrance and exit points
leading into the project area. c.
Stockpile topsoil and debris
outside the riparian corridor and
protect from stream flows or
runoff. 12 . During the Preble's
active season (May 1 through
November 1 ). work only during
daylight hours to avoid disrupting
Preble's nocturnal activities. 13.
Promptly remove waste to
minimize site disturbance and
avoid attracting predators. 14.
Cover exposed holes or piles of
loose dirt with boards. tarps. or
other materials to prevent
Endangered entrapment. 15. Use best
EHP Review Other (EHP) Species Act management practices (BMPs) to No Recommended
(ESA) limit construction-related
disturbance, such as soil
compaction. erosion. and
sedimentation. and to prevent the
spread of invasive weeds. a. Soil
compaction: Establish one access
route for workers.. vehicles. and
machinery, preferably along a
previously disturbed surface or
route. b. Soil compaction:
Temporarily line access routes
with geotextiles or other materials.
especially in wet. unstable soils. c.
Weed control: Wash and inspect
vehicles and equipment before
entering or leaving the project
area so that they are free of
noxious weed seeds and plant
parts. d. Weed control: Use only
weed free certified materials.
including gravel, sand. top soil.
seed. and mulch. 16. Complete
construction before beginning
restoration or enhancement
activities.
Internal Comments
No. Queue User Date/Time Reviewer Comments
Note: Grantee comment is address in the SOW notes. This
Addendum is being written to capture damages to CR15. 5
Final PALACIO 04-18-2014 consisting of eroded roadway shoulder that was not captured
15 Review JOSE 09: 11 PM during the initial field survey and related HMP.Final Reviewer
GMT finds eligible the application and approves the funding of this
project worksheet based on the applicant having performed all
required procurement procedures. perform all required special
hops://connect I .dlis.gov/emm ie/,Dana[nfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatch Destination.do?... 4/30/20 14
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 33 of 34
considerations recommendations such as permits to address
EHP considerations and securing all actual cost
documentation for the financial reconciliation of this project.
Task Force Leader- J. Palacio 04/03/2014
Grantee 04-18-2014
14 Review PATEL KAJAL 07:59 PM Version to add HMP to this project
GMT
04-18-2014
13 Grantee PATEL KAJAL 07: 55 PM Scope of work item #8 says 406 HM is not feasible however
Review GMT the HMP is included in this PW. Adjust SOW.
PW — 643 Weld County. CAT C. 95% Complete. County
road/culvert repair. mitigation includes adding rip rap and
geotextile fabric in 2 locations to secure washed out culverts. -
tcookro - 03/05/2014 15:53:53 GMT
Applicant will add fill. turf reinforcement mat and willow staking
to stabilize banks. - bsherma1 - 04/17/2014 20:34: 50 GMT
Project has no potential to impact the wetland function or
resources and substantially restores site to pre-disaster
condition. No further wetland review is required under the 8-
step process. - tcookro - 03/05/2014 16:21 :35 GMT
Entire community will benefit from project completion. -
tcookro - 03/05/2014 15: 56:26 GMT
Action is addressed under the attached Emergency
Consultation between FEMA and USFWS, dated September
24. 2013. The consultation includes conservation measures
EHP PATTERSON 04-18-2014 intended to minimize impacts to the federally listed Preble's
12 Review MOLLY 01 :42 PM Meadow Jumping Mouse, Ute's Lady's Tress and Colorado
GMT Butterfly Bush. and Designated Critical Habitat protected under
the ESA. - tcookro - 03/07/2014 16:52: 15 GMT
Please adjust the ESA radial to "May Affect. Not Likely to
Adversely Affect" (to match comments and conditions) and
adjust Mig. Bird radials to 2nd & 3rd radials.
Project sites are located in Zones A. B & C. on various panels
including FIRM panel 0802660637C dated 09128/1982. Per 44
CFR Part 9.5 (g) Step 1 : Project repairs are determined to
have no effect on floodplain or wetlands provided that the
repairs remain in the existing footprint and do not impact
previously undisturbed areas. No further floodplains review is
required. - tcookro - 03/05/2014 16: 26:29 GMT
The scope of work has been reviewed and meets the criteria of
the 2013 signed Programmatic Agreement, Appendix B. III-
A,B. and C agreed to by FEMA and the SHPO. - tcookro -
03/05/2014 16:29: 54 GMT
Insurance JOHNSON 04-17-2014 The additional FEMA eligible damages will not alter the prior
11 08:05 PM insurance policy coverage comments or the insurance
Review KENNETH GMT requirement comments.
Mitigation 04-17-2014 The Hazard Mitigation Proposal is approved - Mark W. Petitt.
10 Review PETITT MARK GMT PM 406 Specialist
04-17-2014 Applicant is insured through the CCCPP risk pool. That policy
Insurance JOHNSON specifically excludes roadways from coverage. Insurance
9 Review KENNETH GMT PM proceeds are not anticipated, and there is no insurance O&M
for roads.
04-17-2014
Mitigation The Hazard Mitigation Proposal is approved - Brian W. Drost.
8 Review PETITT MARK GMT PM 406 Specialist
7 Initial HILTON 04-17-2014 4-17-2014: Moved forward as eligible. No other issues found.
Review KIMREY 03:33 PM KAH
https://connect I .dhs.gov/emm ie/,Danalnfo=isource.tema.net,SSL+dispatch Destination .do?... 4/30/20 14
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 34 of 34
GMT
Award 04-14-2014
6 Review SYSTEM 05:45 PM ACCEPTED
GMT
Note: Grantee comment is address in the SOW notes. Final
Reviewer finds eligible the application and approves the
04-03-2014 funding of this project worksheet based on the applicant
5 Final PALACIO 08: 14 PM having performed all required procurement procedures.
Review JOSE GMT perform all required special considerations recommendations
such as permits to address EHP considerations and securing
all actual cost documentation for the financial reconciliation of
this project. Task Force Leader- J. Palacio 04/03/2014
03-13-2014
Grantee BALDWIN Scope of work item #8 says 406 HM is not feasible however
4 Review SCOTT GMT PM the HMP is included in this PW. Adjust SOW.
PW — 643 Weld County, CAT C. 95% Complete. County
road/culvert repair, mitigation includes adding rip rap and
geotextile fabric in 2 locations to secure washed out culverts. -
tcookro - 03/05/2014 15: 53: 53 GMT
Project has no potential to impact the wetland function or
resources and substantially restores site to pre-disaster
condition. No further wetland review is required under the 8-
step process. - tcookro - 03/05/2014 16:21 : 35 GMT
Entire community will benefit from project completion. -
tcookro - 03/05/2014 15: 56:26 GMT
Action is addressed under the attached Emergency
Consultation between FEMA and USFWS , dated September
24, 2013. The consultation includes conservation measures
intended to minimize impacts to the federally listed Preble's
EHP PATTERSON 03-07-2014 Meadow Jumping Mouse. Ute's Lady's Tress and Colorado
3 Review MOLLY 09:09 PM Butterfly Bush, and Designated Critical Habitat protected under
GMT the ESA. - tcookro - 03/07/2014 16: 52: 15 GMT
Please adjust the ESA radial to "May Affect. Not Likely to
Adversely Affect" (to match comments and conditions) and
adjust Mig. Bird radials to 2nd & 3rd radials.
Project sites are located in Zones A. B & C. on various panels
including FIRM panel 0802660637C dated 09/28/1982. Per 44
CFR Part 9.5 (g) Step 1 : Project repairs are determined to
have no effect on floodplain or wetlands provided that the
repairs remain in the existing footprint and do not impact
previously undisturbed areas. No further floodplains review is
required. - tcookro - 03/05/2014 16:26:29 GMT
The scope of work has been reviewed and meets the criteria of
the 2013 signed Programmatic Agreement, Appendix B. III-
A,B. and C agreed to by FEMA and the SHPO. - tcookro -
03/05/2014 16:29:54 GMT
Mitigation 03-04-2014 The Hazard Mitigation Proposal is approved - Brian W. Drost.
2 Review DROST BRIAN GMT PM 406 Specialist
02-27-2014 Applicant is insured through the CCCPP risk pool. That policy
1 Insurance GILLIAM 10:46 PM specifically excludes roadways from coverage. Insurance
Review ROBERT GMT proceeds are not anticipated. and there is no insurance O&M
for roads.
littps://connectl .dhs.gov/emmiet Danainfo=isourcelema.net,SSL+dispatch Destination.do:'.. . 4/30/2014
Hello