The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20151503.tiff RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION FOR COUNTY ROAD 20.5 BETWEEN COUNTY ROADS 5 AND 7 (FEMA) AND AUTHORIZE CHAIR TO SIGN WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board has been presented with a Community Development Block Grant Application for County Road 20.5 between County Roads 5 and 7 (FEMA) from the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, to the Colorado Department of Public Safety, Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, commencing upon full execution, with further terms and conditions being as stated in said application, and WHEREAS, after review, the Board deems it advisable to approve said application, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the Community Development Block Grant Application for County Road 20.5 between County Roads 5 and 7 (FEMA) from the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, to the Colorado Department of Public Safety, Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, be, and hereby is, approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the Chair be, and hereby is, authorized to sign said application. Ce' OEM) a<1e.c# alga2015-1503 EM0016 BC0045 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION FOR CR 20.5 BETWEEN CRS 5 AND 7(FEMA) PAGE 2 The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 27th day of May,A.D.,2015. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY,COLORADO ATTEST: C� „„/ EXCUSED CC// �C L� Barbara Kirkmeyer,Chair Weld County Clerk to the Board Mike Freeman, Pro-Tern De. ty Clerk to the :•�t�+t11 �1-�� Sean P.Conway av�. APPROV AS TO F� ' Julie A.A.Cozad County Attorney � '1(Ijl�, EXCUSED / Steve Moreno Date of signature: LP/ Steve 2015-1503 EM0016 BC0045 Colorado Division of Homeland Security Grant NOI / Application Emergency Management CDBG - DR Recover Colorado Infrastructure Program THIS SECTION FOR STATE USE ONLY DHSEM Identification Number: Colorado Point of Contact: CDBG-DR Program Manager Date NOI (Part A) Received: Colorado DHSEM 9195 East Mineral Avenue, Suite 200 Date Application (Part B) Received: Centennial, Colorado 80112 Office: 720.852.6713 Date Next Steps Letter Transmitted: Fax: 720.852.6750 cdps dhsem cdbg@state.co.us PART A - NOI: PROJECT OVERVIEW 1 . Applicant Legal Name: Weld County. Colorado 2. Applicant Type: ✓ Local Government Private Non-Profit (Attach copy of 501c3, if applicable) 3. Project Title: County Match FEMA Projects - WELCO06 489 4. Proposed Project Total Cost: 186.347.84 CDBG-DR-I Request: 23.293.48 5. Certifications: The undersigned assures fulfillment of all requirements of the CDBG-DR Recover Colorado Infrastructure Program as contained in the program guidelines and that all information contained herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. The governing body of the applicant has duly authorized the document, commits to the non-Federal and State share identified in the Budget, and hereby applies for the assistance documented in this application. Also, the applicant understands that the project may proceed ONLY AFTER a GRANT AGREEEMENT is approved. • Mike Freeman , Pro—Tem Weld County Commissioner (970) 356-4000 Typed Name of Authorized Applicant Agent l r'G Telephone Number PIP-AtradLeatne MAY 17 205 Signature of Authorized Applicant Agent Date Signed 2015-1503 Attach any continuations or additional item as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 1 of 20 L ('D13(:-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management PART A - NOI : APPLICANT INFORMATION 1 . Applicant Legal Name: Weld County, Colorado 2. FIPS Code: 123 DUNS Number: 07575-7955 3. U.S. Congressional District: 4th Congressman Name: 4. State Senatorial District: 1 Senator Name: M r. Cory Gardner 5. State Legislative District: 50 Representative Name: Mr. Ken Buck 6. Primary Point of Contact: The Primary Point of Contact is the person responsible for coordinating the implementation of this proposal, if approval is granted. Ms. I Mr. ✓ \lrs. . First Name: Roy Last Name: Rudisill Title: Director organization: Weld County Office of Emergency Managemc Street Address: 1 150 O Street City: Greeley State: Colorado Zip Code: 80631 Telephone: ( if u ) ill I n : ( tU )3,_Itp- / i6 Mobile: ,Y /U ) 381 -U E-mail Address: rudisill c(Dco .weld . co 7. Alternate Point of Contact: The Alternate Point of Contact is the person that can address questions or concerns in the Primary Point of Contact's absence. Ms. ✓ \lr. MisjI First Name: Barb i ast Name: Connolly Title: Controller Organization: Weld County Accounting Street Address: 1 150 O Street City: Greeley State: Colorado lip Code: 80631 Telephone: ( 1U ) .5B I . ' : ly I U )iin- ( 6 Mobile: L-mail Address: bconnolly(a�co .weld . K. Application Prepared by: Ms. ll Mr.r. V Mrs . First Name: Kyle Last Name: Jones Title: Planner Organization: ARCADIS-US Street Address: City: Tallahasst State: FL Zip Code: 32309 Telephone: (bDU )(5 I x: Mobile: (215) 2u2-3 E-mail Address: kyle . jones(c7�arcadis- 9. Authorized Applicant Agent: \k. ,/ Mr. Mrs. . First Name: Barbara Last Name: Kirkmeyer Title: COMMiSSil Organization: Weld County Street Address: 1150 O Street, P . O . Box 758 City: Greeley State: Colorado zip Code: 80631 Telephone: k 1 U ) iRi I , x: Mobile: F-mail Address: bkirkmeyer W,,co.wel( The Authorized Applicant Agent MUST be the chief executive officer, mayor, etc. This person must be able to sign contracts, authorize funding allocations or payments, etc. Attach any continuations or additional item as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 2 of 20 CDB(:-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management PART A - NOI: PROJECT DESCRIPTION & NATIONAL OBJECTIVES MET 1. Project — Eligible Activity Description: Describe the proposed project. Explain how the proposed project will address recovery and/or resilience needs in your community either independently or as part of a larger project. Include a description of the desired outcome and the recovery objective(s) to be achieved. This narrative should describe the CDBG-DR Eligible Activity. In an effort to achieve resiliency from the severe storms and minimize risk to the general public, Weld County addressed severe damage to local roadways , bridges. culverts , removed hazardous roadway debris, made emergency repairs to paved and gravel roadways, addressed river embankments/dangerous conditions to the public and made repairs to emergency response vehicles that were damaged during the Incident Period . FEMA Categories A, B , C , and E were addressed in the Weld County FEMA Match . CDBG funds are needed to be applied towards the Weld County FEMA Local Match for the emergency work that was identified on previously submitted Project Worksheets . All projects covered under the Weld County Project Worksheets were vital for Weld County to clear hazardous debris from roadways/creeks/streams and enhance their infrastructure, river embankments, equipment and roadways . This particular NOI/Application will discuss �A/CI r�nnc IAQf \ mhr. Drr` r 4 1/\l I k ♦ ,.yf+nnhr 4 +rte +hdr r, r,r, Iir..,}ir�r. frr rnf,- rir, Th O 2. Site / Physical Location: Describe the area(s) affected/protected by this project, including location by complete street address and longitude and latitude (coordinates in decimal degrees). The latitude is 40 .313140 and the longitude is - 104 . 244800 . The attached spreadsheet shows the Lat/Long coordinates for all of the project worksheets and depict the damage site locations as identified in the correlating Project Worksheets . However: the area affected a 3. Population Served: Briefly describe the demographics of the population served or protected by this project. Include the percent of the overall community population benefiting from this project. Explain your response. An estimated 90% or more of the community benefited from the proactive work by Weld County and the removal of hazardous debris and the emergency work/repairs made to the roadways, bridges, equipment and culverts. The population benefiting from this Match Project will include an LMI level population percentage that will be directly or indirectly impacted through this project. This NOI and the associated PW impacted the entire County and demographic area . White : 67 .6% , Hispanic: 28 . 3% , Other: 1 .6% , Asian : 1 . 3% , Black : 0 .8% , Native American : 0 .4% . Weld County consists of 99, 317 households with a median househo d income of S56,58_9 and the maiori:v o- We d Coun:v is owner-occupied with a 4. Priority of this Project: If you are submitting more than one CDBG-DR Infrastructure NOI, what is the relative priority of this project? Please indicate the priority as: Priority # of ii-f# Projects Submitted. Priority 17 of 36 Projects Submitted . Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 3 of 20 CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management PART A - NOI : CDBG-DR FUNDING QUALIFICATIONS Community Development Block Grant — Disaster Recovery (CDBG-DR) funding can be approved for a project in which ALL of the following requirements are met The physical location of the activity must be within a county listed in Table 1 of the program Recover Colorado Infrastructure Grant Program Guidelines (Guidelines). 1. Connection to Disaster Recovery CDBG's Disaster Recovery funds must be used for necessary expenses related to disaster relief, long-term recovery, restoration of infrastructure and housing, economic revitalization, and mitigation from future damages.. The activity must show a direct link to damages received during one or more of the events listed in Table 1 of the Guidelines. Please provide a brief explanation of how the proposed acquisition activity: (1) was a result of the disaster event: (2) will restore infrastructure or revitalize the economy: or will (3) mitigate future damages. During the incident period of September 11 , 2013 to September 30 , 2013 , Weld County, Colorado received heavy rainfall and debris in the creeks , streams and rivers which caused surface gravel removal and scour damage to numerous roads and bridges in Weld County . This NOI Application request addresses emergency work and the damages that were a rJ:r. ♦ r.� .. I nF � � i. .-.. .. r.� �� rJ:r� T� � v.- � �:vim .-. n\ A / Fes .- :.� • � :41� 2. Compliance with National Objectives State recipients receiving allocations under the CDBG-DR program must certify that their projected use of funds will ensure, and maintain evidence, that each of its activities assisted with CDBG-DR funds meets at least one of the three National Objectives. a) Which of the National Objectives are met by proposed project? I ✓ I Will benefit low and moderate income (LMI) persons; or Will aid in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight; or I Is an Urgent Need in which meet community development needs having a particular urgency because existing conditions pose a serious and immediate threat to the health or welfare of the community where other financial resources are not available to meet such needs. b) How will the proposed project meet the above checked National Objective(s). See attached LMI data for the Project. In addition to the LMI data attached , the State of Colorado (according to ACS 2008-2012 5Y ) lists Weld County at a 41 . 0% LMI . In reviewing the LMI data for this Project NOI , the PW associated LMI % was 52 . 27% . However, this percentage does not accurately capture the total number of service areas that are either directly or indirectly impacted by the FEMA Match Projects . The entire community benefited from the proactive emergency work by Weld County and the removal of hazardous debris and the work/repairs made to the roadways , bridges, equipment and culverts thus the County believes that a higher LMI % should be given for this FEMA match Projects . The general vicinity of FEMA Match Projects encompasses the entire County and greatly benefits the entire LMI population for this project, which is why the County believes that this project not only meets , but exceeds the 50% requirement for meeting the National Objective . The emergency work/repairs that were made under the WELCO PW's for the Local FEMA Match drastically reduced hazardous conditions for the general public and enabled Weld County to focus on resiliency efforts post storm . It is believed that the service area for Project Site Locations benefited multiple LMI tract sections and thus a higher weighted percentage of over 50% should be noted for this p Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 4 of 20 i CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 3. Compliance with the primary objective. As indicated in the Guidelines: "A proposed project's benefits to LMI persons will be an important factor in evaluating potential infrastructure projects. A total of 20% of the Recover Colorado Infrastructure project funding must benefit LMI persons. Due to the very low percentage of LMI projects submitted in the first round of infrastructure funding, it is estimated that approximately 25% to 30% of the funding available in this second allocation must meet the LMI requirement to make up for the deficit." This section does not need to be completed if the project does not meet this National Objective. The primary objective for using CDBG Disaster Recovery funds is benefitting, by at least 51 percent, persons of low and moderate income. The following section provides the information necessary to complete this requirement. a) Is the proposed activity: / jurisdiction wide [ specified target area If you checked specified target area, which data source was used? (Note: select the smallest unit of Census data that encompasses your proposed target area.) b) Enter the number of households involved in the proposed project. 99 ,317 c) In the space below, describe how the applicant will comply with the requirement that at least 51 percent of CDBG-DR dollars will principally benefit low- and moderate-income households and persons. Weld County will comply with the 51 % requirement due to the fact that the PW associated under this NOI Project for the FEMA County Match is targeted to areas of the county that qualify as LMI . The justification behind this methodology is that multiple o d) Enter the number of households within each income category expected to benefit from the proposed project. Incomes above 80% of the County Median 785 Incomes above 50% and up to 80% of the County Median 1265 Incomes at or below 50% of the County Median 2060 e) Which type of income was used to determine the above? (Check only one) As determined by the American Community Survey (Public Facilities projects) Annual income as defined for Public Housing and Section 8 �/ Annual income as reported under the Census long form Adjusted gross income as defined for reporting under IRS Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 5 of 20 ('I)JU;-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management PART A - NOI: COMPREHENSIVE RISK ANALYSIS INFORMATION 1. Community Hazards Review: Please list and briefly describe in rank order of importance the natural or man-made hazards in your (the Applicant's) service area. The hazards identified within this Project for the FEMA County Match for WELCO06 (489 ) would be ranked in the following manner: Flood , Erosion and Subsidence . The hazards caused significant damage and posed a severe risk to the community for the designated incident period . 2. High Risk Hazards Addressed by the Project: Describe how, and the degree to which, the proposed project mitigates high risk hazards. Include damage history, source and type of problem, frequency of event(s), and severity of damage information, if available. Hazard 1 Flooding caused the most severe damage to Weld County during the designated incident period and this Project addressed and mitigated against severe flood damage to local roadways , bridges, culverts, removed hazardous debris along roadways . In addition , County Officials ensured repairs were made to paved and gravel roadways for the safety of the community and addressed river embankments/dangerous conditions to the public and made repairs to emergency response vehicles that were damaged during the Incident Period . The repairs made brought the damaged infrastructure back to its pre-disaster condition in accordance with regulations . lla/ard 2 Erosion also caused a severe issue for the County. This Project addressed and mitigated against severe erosion damage to local roadways, shoulders, and embankments. The work that was conducted by the County mitigated against any immediate threat/hazard to the damaged infrastructure and restored the infrastructure back to its pre-disaster condition in accordance with regulations . Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 6 of 20 r CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency rgency Management Hazard 3 Subsidence was another critical hazard that caused dangerous conditions for the community . This Project addressed and mitigated against severe subsidence damage to local roadways , shoulders , bridges and embankments . The work that was conducted by the County mitigated against any immediate threat/hazard to the damaged infrastructure and restored the infrastructure back to its pre-disaster condition in accordance with regulations. Note: If your proposed project addresses more than three Hazards, please provide that information as an attachment. 3. Elimination of Risk: Does the proposed project result in the elimination of a hazard from your (the Applicant's) service area? If so, please describe. If not, please estimate the degree to which this project will mitigate the risk from the hazards identified in Item #2. The Proposed FEMA Local Match for WELCO06 (489 ) does not completely eliminate the hazards identified from the service area . The Proposed FEMA Match Project does allow Weld County to receive a percentage of funds back that the County expended during one of the most costly disasters in Colorado history however. These types of hazards that occurred in Weld County and throughout Colorado are truly an act of mother nature and the County was as prepared as it could have been but the severity/duration of the incident was of an unprecedented nature . Weld County cannot eliminate the risk of future flooding , erosion or land subsidence , but Local Officials can ensure that their community is prepared for future incident, take the necessary precautions and that their infrastructure is restored p 4. Environmental Quality Improvements: Does the proposed project result in an improvement in the quality of the natural environment in your (the Applicant's) service area? If so, please describe. Yes; the damages that attributed to the designated incident period and FEN/IA-DR 4145 were addressed via the previously submitted PW and the work conducted to restore the infrastructure back to its pre-disaster condition was implemented . The work done at this site location (see previous attachment for lat/long coordinates ) addressed not only improvements/repairs made to the infrastructure , but also improvements and repairs to the river embankments and any potential erosion or subsidence issues that could have to;nrc-nnnrt if fl-in ("r t irifvr hnrt not tnLn�n +inn nrnnn+iten mnnoi trnc thnf +hint/ did 5. Climate Change Improvements: Does the proposed project reduce or ameliorate a projected impact of climate change in Colorado? If so, please briefly describe the benefit of the project. This Proposed Project reduces a projected impact climate change due to the proactive mitigation measures that were undertaken by Weld County during the designated incident period . This was accomplished by ensuring that the damaged site location was addressed as soon , but as safely, as possible . and not to sustain any further impacts to the site locations or environment that would enable the damage to enhance the projected impact of any potential climate changes . Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 7 of 20 a_ CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 6. Community Process: Does the proposed project include a community planning or involvement process that increases community resiliency? If so, please briefly describe the process. This Proposed Project was initiated by County Officials in an effort to achieve resiliency from the severe storms and also to minimize risk to the community, Weld County addressed the severe flood damage to the roadways and infrastructure by ensuring that dangerous conditions for the public were addressed and mitigated properly and efficiently. 7. Reduction in the Costs of Future Response or Recovery: Will the proposed project result in a reduction in the cost of response or recovery from an incident occurring due to one or more of the hazards identified in Item #1 or #2? If so, please briefly describe how response or recovery costs will be reduced. For a small scale flooding incident, yes; however, the flooding that occurred during the designated incident period was catastrophic and the PW associated with the NOI FEMA Local Match Request were completed to address the damages . 8. Floodplain/Floodway/Substantially Damaged Properties: Does the proposed project include a property or properties located in a floodway or floodplain; or not located in a regulatory floodplain but which were substantially damaged or have a history of damage from at least two disaster events? If so, please identify those properties below. No; the Proposed Project is for the FEMA Local Match for WELCO06 (489) from CDBG-DR in regards to expenses from CAT C Damage Categories for the designated incident period for FEMA-DR 4145 . 9. Mitigation Planning: Does your community have a current FEMA approved multi-hazard mitigation plan? Yes \o Location of proposed project in mitigation plan strategies: Page 139 Section/Part Mitigation Stra Is the community a member of good standing with the National Flood Insurance Program? l c N o Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 8 OI' 20 CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 10. Community Plan Compliance: Does the proposed project comply with and/or address an issue recognized in key community plans? Key plans include, but are not limited to: a Comprehensive Master Plan, a Stormwater Management Plan, a Hazard Mitigation Plans, or key community codes. If so, please describe how the project integrates into the plan(s). Yes; the Proposed Project complies with all local community plans and this Project integrates into the Plans because the County addressed the damages to local roadways and infrastructure and mitigated damages that posed a serious risk/hazard to the community during the incident period . This FEMA PW was initiated by Weld County and via this Proposed Project, the County requests that CDBG funds be applied towards the local FEMA Match for this Project. 11. Environmental / Historic Preservation Issues: Please describe any significant environmental, historic, or cultural features that may be affected by the project. Please also describe any features that may be improved by the project. All environmental issues are addressed on the Project Worksheet as supporting documentation (see attached ). The significant EHP issues were in regards to the Endangered Species Act ( ESA) and EHP Standard Conditions. 12. Permitting: Please list the local, state, and federal permits that will be required to complete this project. All permitting was addressed on the attached Project Worksheet as supporting documentation . The significant permitting issues were in regards to the Endangered Species Act ( ESA) and EHP Standard Conditions . All items were addressed and any additional supporting backup documentation can be provided upon request. Please see below for environmental permits that were obtained . Floodplain Permit Ann rinrmi+ Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 9 of 20 ■ CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 13. Community Resilience: Please describe how this project will increase the resilience of your community. As defined in the Guidelines: "Resilience incorporates hazard mitigation and land use planning strategies; critical infrastructure, environmental and cultural resource protection; and sustainability practices to reconstruct the built environment, and revitalize the economic, social, and natural environments." In an effort to achieve resiliency from the severe storms and minimize risk to the general public, Weld County addressed severe damage to local roadways , bridges, culverts, removed hazardous debris roadways , made repairs to paved and gravel roadways , addressed river embankments/dangerous conditions to the public and made repairs to emergency response vehicles that were damaged during the Incident Period . This Proposed Project addresses proactive work initiated by Weld County during FEMA-DR 4145 enabled the community to recover in an expeditious manner and increased the resilience of the community by incorporating nearly every aspect of sustainability and revitalizing the community. The community was able to recover quicker due to the proactive work done through this Proposed Project and the associated PW's . 14. Maps Please attach the following maps with the project site and structures marked on the map. Use SAME ID number as in the Individual Property Worksheets. Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM). If the FIRM for your area is not published, please attach a copy of the Flood Hazard Boundary Map (FHBM). City or county scale map (large enough to show the entire project area) USGS 1 :24,000 topo map Parcel Map (Tax Map, Property Identification Map, etc.) Overview photographs. The photographs should be representative of the project area, including any relevant streams, creeks, rivers, etc., and drainage areas which affect the project site of will be affected by the project. 15. Additional Comments (Optional): Enter any additional comments related to the proposed project's ability to reduce hazard risk and increase community resiliency. This proposed project reduced the hazard risk to the community and increased resiliency by the work conducted through the PW in correlation with FEMA-DR 4145 . CDBG funds are being requested to be applied to the local FEMA Match ( 12 . 5% ) for the PW. All maps are located in project files that were previously submitted and will be provided upon request. The entire community benefited from the nroactive work by Weld County and the removal oel Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 10 of 20 CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management PART A - NOI : DECISION MAKING PROCESS 1. Decision-Making Process: Describe the process you used to decide that this project is the best solution to the problem. Explain why this project is the best alternative you considered. Address questions such as: • Are you focusing on the area in your community that has the greatest potential for losses? • Have you considered the risks to critical facilities and structures and benefits to be obtained by mitigating this vulnerability? • Have you considered those areas or projects that present the greatest opportunities given the current situation(s) of interest in your community? • Are you addressing a symptom or the source of the problem? Addressing the source of the problem is a long-term solution which provides the most mitigation benefits. • If impacts to the environment, natural, cultural or historic resources have been identified, explain how your alternatives and proposed project address, minimize, or avoid these impacts. The Site locations within this WELCO PW in the Proposed Project were identified due to the high dollar amount of funds that were expended by Weld County to ensure the safety of the community and also restore county infrastructure back to its pre-disaster condition . This Proposed Project has site locations across the entire community and service area and it was determined that a large percentage of the LMI population was impacted by the severe flooding incident and the proactive work by County Officials enabled the community to recover quicker, thus allowing the community to sustain resiliency and return operations to normal . 2. Acquisition Projects - Describe the community's methodology for selecting the properties to be acquired in this application and how each is ranked (highest to lowest): N/A Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 11 of 20 CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management PART A - NOI: SCOPE OF WORK / BUDGET OVERVIEW / FINANICAL FACTORS 1. Project Scope: Please provide a comprehensive and detailed description of the scope of the proposed project. Describe each of the project components and the steps necessary to complete that work. If the proposed project is a funding match for another disaster recovery or infrastructure development program, please identify the agency, program funds, and project reference number that CDBG-DR funding is intended to support. Also describe any critical deadlines that must be met to accomplish this work. This Proposed Project is for the Local FEMA Match for costs for WELCO06 (489 ) . These costs were incurred as a result of FEMA-DR 4145 . During the incident period of September 11 , 2013 to September 30 , 2013 , Weld County, Colorado received heavy rainfall and debris in the creeks , streams and rivers which caused severe flooding to and along roadways and surface streets , and also severely damaged local infrastructure . This NOI Application request addresses the emergency work / damages that were a direct result of the severe flooding . A Scope of Work is included within the PW and addresses the work that was completed and is attached to this NOI Application . 2. Community Priority: Please describe why this project is a priority for your organization. This Proposed Project is a priority for Weld County to utilize the CDBG funding as the Local FEMA Match to offset the costs for the proactive work done by the County to reduce hazardous conditions to the community . Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 12 of 20 CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 3. Project Cost Summary: Please summarize the major cost components of the project. Please round all values to the nearest dollar. a. Planning / Engineering / Design $ b. Environmental Compliance $ The value of general and/or c. Real Property Acquisition / Demolition $ professional labor wages must be tabulated in accordance d. Closing Costs / Legal Fees $ with the Davis Bacon Act of e. Housing Program Assistance $ 1931 f. Construction Costs $ g. Project Delivery Costs $ Ii. Other (specify below) $ 186,347 84 See Project Worksheet Cost ;attached; i. Total ofa-h $ 186,347.84 :Y j. Duplication of Benefits (if unknown at time of application enter zero). $ 0.00 k. Subtract j. from i. to determine Total Project Cost $ 186.347.84 Notes: Housing Program Assistance costs include the cost of compliance with Uniform Relocation Assistance (URA) and Comparable Housing Assistance (CHA) requirements. Project Delivery Costs include the costs of project delivery by the sponsoring organization but do not include administrative overhead. 4. Total Project Cost Allocations Proposed Project Total Cost: $ 186.347.84 Federal Cost Share: $ 139.760.88 State Cost Share: $ 23.293.48 $ 23.293.48 Local Cost Share 5. Basis of Cost Estimate: Briefly describe how the cost estimates listed in #3 above were developed (e.g. lump sum, unit cost, quotation, etc.). The Cost Estimates were developed above from actual work that was properly procured and conducted . They come directly off of what was included on the FEMA approved PW and the costs are broken down by type of work and site . 6. Project Management: Describe how you will manage the costs and schedule, and how you will ensure successful performance. The work for this Proposed Project has been completed or is pending completion . The 12 . 5% CDBG Local Match will be applied towards the Weld County Match for FEMA PW's and the costs that were previously incurred during the disaster. Note: The applicant must agree to furnish quarterly reports during the entire time the project is in active status. Quarters end on March 31st, June 30th, September 30th, and December 31st. Reports are due to the State within 15 days after the end of each quarter.) Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 13 of 20 CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 7. Project Maintenance Requirements: The following questions are to give assurance on the project's maintenance over its useful life. Please answer each question and give a brief explanation. a. If the project involves the acquisition of real property, what is the proposed land use after acquisition? (i.e., Agriculture, Recreation, Vacant Land, Park, Wetlands, etc.) N/A b. Will the project require periodic maintenance? No c. If yes, who will provide the maintenance? N/A d. What is the estimated cost of maintenance on an annual basis? 0 Note: Cost of maintenance is considered an application prioritization weighting factor. Projects with high maintenance costs have a greater risk of future failure due to deferred maintenance. Therefore, the responses provided above should be as complete and verifiable as possible in order to minimize the likelihood of ranking point reductions due to maintenance concerns. 8. Additional Comments: Enter any additional comments related to the proposed project's funding, if desired . CDBG funds are needed for the 12 . 5% Local FEMA Match and the associated PW's that are included in the NOI-Application . 9. Financial / Fiscal Health Factors: Please indicate the total budget (all funds) of your organization. Please describe the impact of disaster recovery efforts to date on this budget. In addition, if this objective is selected based on the local governments inability to finance the activity, the municipality must also include in the application package a resolution stating this fact and supporting documentation such as budgetary information, a description of TABOR restrictions, and the most recent audit report or approved exemption from audit. Weld County's total 2015 budget is $307 ,031 , 089 .00 . The impact of the September, 2013 flooding has primary been on the damage to the county's road and bridge system . The damage has resulted in Weld County having to transfer $5 million from the Contingency Fund to the Public Works Fund in 2013 and in 2014 for a total of $ 10 million dollars . Without assistance from FEMA, FWHA, and CDBG the amount would have several million more . The impact has also forced the county to shift local resources from projects unrelated to flooding to deal with the emergency situations created by the flood in both the 2013 and 2014 fiscal years . Even in 2015 the county is still using local resources to recover from the flooding . Fortunately , Weld County has always been fiscally conservative and budgeted responsibly . Had the county not taken the responsible approach to its finances county service would have had to have been cut to cope with the flood recovery . \1/c Ir1 flnl Inf\c nncsrotcc• inrlor the mnct roctrirti. ,n nrnn r+ t limitntinn in thc> ctotn RD irlocC Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 14 or 20 CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management PART B - APPLICATION : PROJECT MILESTONES / TIMELINES / TASKS I . Timeline / Tasks Insert the proposed work schedule as tasks to accomplish the overall goal of the proposed activity (i.e., appraisals, title search, closing, etc.), and provide a description of the task's purpose. This timeline will be used as a measurement tool for progress in the project's implementation and is included in the required Quarterly Reports. Also, FEMA uses the timeline for determining the approved period of performance. It will be the basis used to justify delays or extensions, if necessary, and should be estimated carefully. The first and last entries are state requirements and have already been entered. Task 1 : Grant Process and Environmental Review Timeframe: 3 Months Task 2: Emergency Repairs- The initial emergency repairs were made directly 1 Completed g y p g Y p Y Timeframe: Task 3: Permanent Repairs - Becuase the emergency repairs were quick repair Completed Timeframe: Task 4: Timeframe: Task 5: Timeframe: Task 6: Timeframe: Task 7: Timeframe: Task 8: Timeframe: Task 9: Timeframe: Final Inspection Report and Project Closeout Task 10: The Final Inspection Report is a review of the activity's paper documentation. showing the project was implemented as required. Once the review is completed. the 3 Months report and findings will be provided to the grantee for review and concurrence. The Timeframe: State submits the concurrence to FEMA as part of a closeout package to formally Total Project Timeframe: 6 Months Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 15 of 20 CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 2. Start Date & Pre-Award Costs: The start date for any project begins upon GRANT AGREEMENT approval by the State Controller. If a different start date or timeframe is needed, provide an explanation below. Also indicate if any pre- award activities or costs have been incurred or authorized. The proposed project is for local FEMA match dollars and the work has already been completed . The repairs for this site began as soon as the flood waters receded and the county crews were able to access the site . The initial phase of repairs were emergency in nature and began in September of 2013 and concluded during November of that same year. Permanent repairs for this site commenced the following year at the beginning of construction season and concluded in October of 2014 . Additionally, cost have been incurred through the preparation of this NOI Application . Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 16 of 20 CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management Please note that Part B is required for the final Application submittal. Part B sections may optionally be completed and submitted with the NOI. Please update any Part A section information when submitting you full Application. PART B — APPLICATION : ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW 1. Environmental Review Background Information & Environmental Review Worksheet: In accordance with 24 CFR Part 58.22 (see below), all federally funded projects must accomplish an environmental review prior to beginning any work on a project. These HUD regulations are in place for two purposes: 1 . To ensure federal funds are used to place people of low and moderate income in environmentally safe conditions; and 2. To ensure federal funds are NOT used to negatively impact environmental conditions that exist near a project site. Please note the following limitations on CDBG-DR grant activities pending environmental clearance per 24 CFR Part 58.22. (a) Neither a recipient nor any participant in the development process, including public or private nonprofit or for-profit entities, or any of their contractors, may commit HUD assistance under a program listed in Sec. 58. 1(b) on an activity or project until HUD or the state has approved the recipient's RROF and the related certification from the responsible entity. In addition, until the RROF and the related certification have been approved, neither a recipient nor any participant in the development process may commit non-HUD funds on or undertake an activity or project under a program listed in Sec. 58. 1(b) if the activity or project would have an adverse environmental impact or limit the choice of reasonable alternatives. (b) N/A for DOLA/CDPS projects. (c) If a recipient is considering an application from a prospective sub-recipient or beneficiary and is aware that the prospective sub-recipient or beneficiary is about to take an action within the jurisdiction of the recipient that is prohibited by paragraph (a) of this section, then the recipient will take appropriate action to ensure that the objectives and procedures of NEPA are achieved. (d) An option agreement on a proposed site or property is allowable prior to the completion of the environmental review if the option agreement is subject to a determination by the recipient on the desirability of the property for the project as a result of the completion of the environmental review in accordance with this part and the cost of the option is a nominal portion of the purchase price. There is no constraint on the purchase of an option by third parties that have not been selected for HUD funding, have no responsibility for the environmental review and have no say in the approval or disapproval of the project. (e) Self-Help Homeownership Opportunity Program (SHOP). In accordance with section 11(d)(2)(A) of the Housing Opportunity Program Extension Act of 1996 (42 U.S.C. 12805 note), an organization, consortium, or affiliate receiving assistance under the SHOP program may advance non-grant funds to acquire land prior to completion of an environmental review and approval of a Request for Release of Funds (RROF) and certification, notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this section. Any advances to acquire land prior to approval of the RROF and certification are made at the risk of the organization, consortium, or affiliate and reimbursement for such advances may depend on the result of the environmental review. This authorization is limited to the SHOP program only and all other forms of HUD assistance are subject to the limitations in paragraph (a) of this section. (f) Relocation. Funds may be committed for relocation assistance before the approval of the RROF and related certification for the project provided that the relocation assistance is required by 24 CFR part 42. Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 17 of 20 CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management Environmental Review Worksheet Check ALL of the activities listed below that will be included as part of the project, REGARDLESS OF THE FUNDING SOURCE: 0 Information and financial services ✓❑ Administrative and management activities ✓ Environmental and other studies, resource identification, and the development of plans and strategies ✓ Most engineering and design costs associated with eligible projects CD Inspections and testing of properties for hazards or defects "2 Project planning -ttQ ❑ Purchase of insurance ≥ ❑ Purchase of tools .6 ❑ Technical assistance and training X .E ❑ Interim assistance to arrest the effects of an imminent threat or physical deterioration in which the assistance W w 0 does not alter environmental conditions. `}' p Public services that will not have a h sical impact or result in any physical changes (e.g., employment, physical PP Y child .� care, health, education, counseling, welfare) �- p Assistance for temporary or permanent improvements that do not alter environmental conditions and are limited to protection, repair, or restoration activities necessary only to control or arrest the effects from disasters or imminent threats to public safety including those resulting from physical deterioration (Must also complete the Regulatory Checklist at the end of Exhibit IV-A) p Operating costs (e.g., maintenance, security, operation, utilities, furnishings, equipment, supplies, staff training Z = and recruitment, other incidental costs) -n _E O Relocation costs LLJ Acquisition, repair, improvement, reconstruction, or rehabilitation when the facilities and improvements are in place and will be retained in the same use without change in size or capacity of more than 20 percent = ❑ Special projects directed to the removal of material and architectural barriers that restrict the mobility of and T., accessibility to elderly and handicapped persons Acquisition (including leasing) or disposition of, or equity loans on, an existing structure ❑ Acquisition (including leasing) of vacant land provided the structure or land acquired, financed, or disposed of will be retained for the same use g Acquisition, repair, improvement, reconstruction, or rehabilitation when the facilities and improvements are in place, but will change in size or capacity of more than 20 percent ❑ Acquisition, repair, improvement, reconstruction, or rehabilitation when the facilities and improvements are in = place, but will involve a change in land use, such as from non-residential to residential, commercial to industrial, or from one industrial use to another O Demolition ✓❑ New construction This checklist must be included with the CDBG application. • Please direct questions to the appropriate contact person below: DOLA/DLG DHSEM Officer Steven Boand, State Disaster Recovery Manager Tamra Norton, Environmental Compliance Of Department of Local Affairs Department of Public Safety 1313 Sherman Street, Room 521, Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management Denver, CO 80203 9195 E Mineral Ave, Suite 200 303-866-6398 Centennial, CO 80112 tamra.norton@state.co.us 720.852.6713 steven.boand@state.co.us DPS/DOLA USE ONLY: Required level of environmental review: O Exempt O CENST O CESTO EA Reviewed by: Date of Review: Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 18 of 20 CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 2. Supplemental Environmental Review Information Enter any additional comments related to environmental concerns for the proposed project if desired. Please list and attach any documents or studies that have been prepared that support the Environmental Review Worksheet responses. All environmental issues are addressed on the attached Project Worksheet as supporting documentation . The significant EHP issues were in regards to the Endangered Species Act ( ESA) and EHP Standard Conditions. All items were addressed and any additional supporting backup documentation can be provided upon request . Please see below for environmental permits that were obtained . Floodplain Permit 404 Nationwide Permit Migratory Birds Permit ( if needed ) Threatened and Endangered Species Permit O Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 19 of 20 CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergence Management PART B - APPLICATION : DETAILED PROJECT BUDGET 1 . Detailed Project Budget: Please enter or attach a detailed and comprehensive final proposed budget for the project. Please note that CDBG-DR funds may be limited to the amount submitted with the NOI pending the availability of additional funding This Proposed Project is for the Local FEMA Match for costs for WELCO06 (489) . These costs were incurred as a result of FEMA-DR 4145 . During the incident period of September 11 , 2013 to September 30 , 2013 , Weld County, Colorado received heavy rainfall and debris in the creeks, streams and rivers which caused severe flooding to and along roadways and surface streets , and also severely damaged local infrastructure . This Application request addresses the emergency work / damages that were a direct result of the severe flooding . A Scope of Work and detailed project budget is included within the PW that is attached . It is important to note that a version request has been made for this Project Worksheet and the attached Project Worksheet may not reflect FINAL costs . • Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 20 of 20 LA IA, 01 0 L C E v 0) E v C m m 'V a C in 0 _ O Co N a d 3 c a 0 0 N 01 v1 O c E m m 0 o E a v c v E E 2 o m c E v - y E a 0 C 5 01 a `o -o n m 0 v w „ c 0 E a s o v a L 0 N 0 > m a o c v E __ C L O 3 3 Lt0 0 0 0 3 0 1) m o to 0 0 0 c c C C C 0 E 0 0 0 a O O L W y CL U U V eta Z � al O C O v O O O x 2 2 2 O O 2 O o J J J J J o o e e e e de o e o 0 0 0 0 t o e e e o 0 0 e 0 0 0 0 0 o e e e e o 0 0 0 J tD ID tD t0 ID o h h 0 D LI D D a1 to 0 .-, o O Cr Cr tO N. CO N. Cr Cr CO Cr 00 h h N. O 001 0 1N O r . ~. C N .-1 N N r i N C N N h N. C rr rd rti l!1 rd N. N N. in al N el r-1 N COCO in in N Vl el C C ."I Cr in Cr N CL 01 CO Ib CO CO CO CO al N N h h 01 m m m 00 m O 00 00 CO h h h 00 O tl1 N h h U) R Ul Ul Ut 00 Q1 07 a1 CO N- M m m m m inCO VI m 00 m m m01 m C h m m M N in N N N N N C 00 m CO in C a 2 a J VI Ill in in in in Ul U1 0 0 in in In Vl UI VI 0 in 0 In In V1 al in 0 0 0 0 U1 ✓1 O u1 0 0 0 UI in UI Vl 0 vl 131 r♦ .-I .-I .-1 v1 CO 00 N. N. VI .--I .-I rr if) r-1 1`..• a1 h Ul VI .-r 01 tD 00 nJ ul ul tO an 1D tD '0 h in 0 in 00 h 00 m m m m m h 01 al rr .-a h m m rn an In h 00 — o O fn h h 01 C o O h O N. 0 0 h r. N N. a) m en m en en re .-i N N m m m N m N N N m rr r *-I N N N N N '-I re re rr ri 2 C O a O J Ul In 0 0 0 0 0 in vl Ul O O Vl 0 0 0 0 0 to m 0 0 0 0 to O Ul 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 In U) m In Ul m h h 4.0O tD tO tD 1.13m O 0 0 0 In tD LID i.0 O tD LO la O to al tD 0 In 0 0 U1 in M UI m .-+ .-1 C M O m 0 0 0 0 0 0 N. C C C C h 0 0 0 m 0 C h C u) tO O re 0 C N tD tO 0 t0 0 C C O h CO h C C N N N N N .-1 .-I r I re N N N re IN re N .-I .-I .--4 .y .y - — J m 0 V1 UI In V1 UI Ul Ul Ill 0 O in Vt Ul VI 0 ul V1 0 0 In U) In O U1 ✓t O Ul in Ul ul ✓1 O O VI Ul to in ul h 0 LID tO VD tO in h M m N N N. tD tO tD 00 WI h O N ul U1 1D Cr al m O to al Cis U1 CI h N. al h tD h M LID h N N N N N tD O O CO CO WI N N N R N m h 00 ,--I .-r N Ut tD O re r1 re VD .-1 LO N N 00 ID C tD rr .-r rr .--I .--e re .-1 r1 r-I r{ rr 2 a J In VI in in in in Ul UI 0 0 in ✓t Vl al U) to in U) 0 Ill Ul UI Ul v1 0 in 0 0 in to al al Ill 0 0 O in 0 Ul 0 Ul r1 CO 00 CO CO CO Ul Ul if) N to in 00 CO 00 a1 0O CO rr Ul h h 00 ID 03 Vl h h c0 h co a1 a) h Ul o U1 U1 O U1 m h I. 1. h N. In ID ID tD lb in r. h h C Ni m tD h in N VD N N N Ul N VI O J r-1 N .-I .ti .1 re .-I .-I re .-1 N N r-I .--I ry .-I N r1 .-I nl N r. r-. .-I M N e-. .--I .--I r. N .--I N eti a-I .-e r1 r. .-I r-4 O Ul .-1 .-r r♦ --I .r 0 0 0 r-I ri O r1 re .--I N .--1 ul Ul .-r 0 0 ri N m 0 tD o 0 to O m CO CO O O al 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .-1 r-I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 re 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 re 0 ere tO 1. in in UI in in ID 0 0 ul U7 tO ul Ul to to N h h tfl 00 CO in -4 _ O O co co .-r CO .-I a1 QI tD to O O O O O N N N NI N 0 N Ni N IN 0 N N N N N 0 0 N .--I re IN N N N N r1 —I N re N r1 re .-1 0 N O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m m m ml m m m m m M m m In m m 01 m In m m Cn m m m m m m m m M m m I M m m Men NM Men N N N N N N N N N IN N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N IN N N N N N N re .—I r1 r'1 rr rM re r1 ry rJ r1 r4 re r-1 r4 re re re re re re r-1 r1 rl r1 r+ re r rr .-1 r-I r i r4 ry r l re re re r1 r1 00 CO CO 00 CO CO 00 CO CO 00 00 00 CO 00 CO CO CO CO 03 CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO 00 CO 00 CO CO 00 CO CO 00 00 00000000000000000 L 000 C 0 0 00000000000000000000 n V) ul to V) Vl V1 N Vl Vl In V1 Vl N Ul N V1 to V1 VI in in ✓1 In V1 VI LA VI LA V1 N VI N VI N VI V1 Vl N VI Vl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 030000000000000000000000000000000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 in 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C0000000000000000 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 01 U) Ul VI in In in in VI U) to UI in to in in UI in UI V7 Ul In In in U1 U1 UI U1 in In in in in Ill V1 Ul Ul Ul in in ul U r-1 re rl re re r+ el re re re r+ r-1 el re re re r-4 re re re r1 re - r-I - rY r1 re r i r1 re re re re re re re r-I re r1 re IN m Cr VI r-1 .-I —4 r1 r-1 ti .-1 N en .-r N .-r nl re .--I n1 .-1 ra N en C .-1 nl M C .--I .-r .-1 re r1 rr C O w. IO V 0 J .-+ m C C C C V in in r. CO 01 O .-r rr .-1 N N ul In tD CO 00 01 rr NJ rr .-i M m m m C rr m Cr U1 tD h r-r rl .-4 r-I et re re r1 rr --I re r/ N N N N IN N N N N m M m m m Mrn M a « « < < « « « < « « « « a a a a a a a < « « « a aa a m 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 m W U W U U U tL U W W W I1J Iu U U U U IL U U U U U IL IL W Ill U U ILI U U U U U U IL U IL Q LL LL LL LL LL LL U- LL U- U- LL IL LL LL LL U- LL LL LL LL U- LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL L.L. LL LL LL LL LL LL C0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O o O 0 o O O h O O CO co in C Cl) N N a1 en N M N N C en O c-I U) N. M in N UI r1 m ID re tD 0 Ul al m 0 01 0) 03 CI C Ul 00 re el in r1 N 'Cr `Zr Ul M CO tO C C U) IN N in VD M 0 CN.- C U N N M N a1 CO 01 al rr 0 l r1 a1 in h h Ul 01 rI 01 al COOO tO W en en I to COD N. C M N al COO 0 m M N h CO en al tp h ID CO N r1 Cr CO r1 tD V1 r1 C 13 V1 0 r1 rti 0 0 O C M In CO CO C CO CO 00 C Cr 0 r-1 CO m m 0 N a1 0 .--I V1 U1 ul V1 CP al N 0 C f. Ul 01 D C C M m M M M C r♦ -r h h C m m M m m 'rr C N.- N N m M N N O N N N N N o 0 Cr C _. C O vo v a a a a v a v v 00 Cr0 a a o a v v a C a C o 0v a V C V C 0 K v a C a v 00 OC J C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C CO CO O in O O al LID 00 M 01 al N N N N rn LO CO a1 al N- O N el O in N M In U1 h C C M al N C CO in CO re CO CO Cee 01 0 C C C C C .CI 0 0 r ct get Ur r•irs 01 00 CO 00 O CO CO N in O O CO h 01 01 CO R U1 M N Ni CO r+ s.001 O 00 N a1 Ut C Cr C Cr Cr O 0 N 0 0 0 00 CO CO rre CO CO 00 rr .m-1 r-1 N O al a1 C CO M m 0 h h CO Ns m C CO tD O N a) Ill VD ID N N N N N R O O CO 03 h C Cr Cr C C tO tO CO 00 03 N CO O O 01 CO CO 00 00 O CO CO UI h 01 tD O r 0 0 4 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V C 0 0 0 In 1n o 0 v 0 v 0 0 0 4 4 0 O In C 0 o O o 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O 0 0 0 O O o O o O o 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 O 0 rti N re r-1 .-r rr rr re re re el r-I .-1 .-1 ri .--I .--1 P-I re r. r. .--1 re r+ N .� H .-1 r1 N r-1 r1 .-1 N r•J N rl r1 .. .-1 0 • • , tit K - of " r �' 1 . PSI -. Di Y v V2' eI Ii' m :ya- i •yr a Sk a ;f : < a y LL .w r •C 1 _ `t i L 4 it ' 1 N NI ~N• ailll - ': M I • S • d '. it f i. .. R • LL s ; r' II ill 31 • yik- mt. 4.41gPi[i • ; •!1 • :+ti �I rail �I wl ^I nl "i r • ato% LL LL LL LL LL LL 1 ,11 •3 t <Pill t f as • • u. LL _ ifii% 1 dd , -- ' - -. 211 1 + ' • _ V1 d S.lir :..") ••• i a} ` • 1 — 4'1 Ili?: p II r f r r 1' r7JM1,7�� ' -Oz 1. S W 't�p i1 }• e © t Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 1 of 16 PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00489(0) Applicant Name: Application Title: WELD (COUNTY) WELCO06 - ROAD - CR 20.5 BETWEEN CR 5 AND CR 7 Period of Performance Start: Period of Performance End: 09-14-2013 Subgrant Application - Entire Application Application Title: WELCO06 - ROAD - CR 20.5 BETWEEN CR 5 AND CR 7 Application Number: PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00489(0) Application Type: Subgrant Application (PW) Preparer Information Prefix Ms. First Name KATHLEEN Middle Initial Last Name RUVARAC Title TAC BRIDGE SPECIALIST Agency/Organization Name FEMA - DHS Address 1 9195 E. MINERAL AVE. Address 2 City CENTENNIAL State CO Zip 80112 Email deanna. butterbaugh@state.co. us Is the application preparer the Point of Contact? No Point of Contact Information Prefix First Name Roy Middle Initial Last Name Rudisill Title Director - OEM Agency/Organization Weld County Address 1 1150 O Street Address 2 rudisill@weldgov.com City Greeley State CO ZIP 80632 https://isource.fema.net/emmie/dispatch Destination.do?menuTi le=&topTile=dsHeader&bolt. . . 8/6/2014 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 2 of 16 Phone 970-304-6540 Fax Email rrudisill@weld.gov.com Alternate Point of Contact Information Prefix First Name Middle Initial Last Name Title Agency/Organization Address 1 Address 2 City State ZIP Phone Fax Email Project Description Disaster Number: 4145 Pre-Application Number: PA-08-CO-4145-RPA-0088 Applicant ID: 123-99123-00 Applicant Name: WELD (COUNTY) Subdivision: Project Number: WELCO06 Standard Project Number/Title: 399 - Road System Damage Please Indicate the Project Type: Neither Alternate nor Improved Application Title: WELCO06 - ROAD - CR 20. 5 BETWEEN CR 5 AND CR 7 Category: C. ROADS & BRIDGES Percentage Work Completed? 95.0 % As of Date: 11 -14-2013 Comments Attachments User Date Document Description Hard Copy File File Name Action Type Reference KATHLEEN 02-05- Map Location Map WELCO06_Location View RUVARAC 2014 Map CR20.pdf( 133.35 kb) KATHLEEN 02-05- Photos Project Site Photos.pdf( 112. 17 kb) View RUVARAC 2014 Photos https://isource.fema.net/emmie/dispatchDestination.do?men«Ti le=&topTile=dsHeader&bott... 8/6/2014 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 3 of 16 Damage Facilities (Part 1 of 2) Facility Site Number Facility Name Address County City State ZIP Previously Action Damaged? 1 CR 20.5 east of Boulder Creek Weld CO No Comments Attachments Facility Name: CR 20.5 east of Boulder Creek Address 1 : Address 2: County: Weld City: State: CO ZIP: Was this site previously damaged? No Percentage Work Completed? 95.00 PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00489(0): CR 20. 5 east of Boulder Creek Location: PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00489(0): During the incident period of September 11 , 2013 to September 30. 2013, Weld County, Colorado received heavy rainfall and debris in the creeks. streams and rivers which caused damage to numerous roads and bridges in Weld County. This project worksheet addresses damages to CR 20.5 between CR 5 and CR 7. in Section 16. T2N. R68W. On November 14. 2013, Kathleen Ruvarac, FEMA TAC Bridge Specialist, David Ray. FEMA Hazard Mitigation Specialist. Gary Moore. FEMA Environmental, Historical, Preservation Specialist, and Donald Dunker, Weld County Public Works Engineer. performed a site investigation at this location to document damages. The road was open Damage Description and and repairs completed at the time of inspection. Dimensions: One asphalt patch on roadway measured 362 ft in length x 13 ft in width = 4,706 SF x 0.75 ft in depth = 3,529.50 CF x 146 LB/CF x 1 ton/2000 LB = 257. 7 TNS asphalt A second asphalt patch on roadway measured 19 ft in length x 13 ft in width x 0. 75 ft in depth = 185.25 CF x 146 LB/CF x 1 ton/2000 LB = 13.5 TNS asphalt Total: 271 .2 TNS asphalt were validated with asphalt thickness of 9 inches. Embankment Material lost in roadway void in the westbound travel lane and on north shoulder measuring 362 ft in length x 15 ft in width x 6 ft in depth = 1 ,206.7 CY and 19 ft in length x 15 ft in width x 6 ft in depth = 63.3 CY, totaling 1 ,270 CY. https://isource.fema.net/emmie/dispatchDestination.do?menuTile=&topTile=dsHeader&boat... 8/6/2014 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 4 of 16 16 LF of 18" CMP washed away from the site and was not recovered. The Applicant has provided pictures of the facility dated 9- 16-2013 documenting damages. These photos are attached to this project worksheet. PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00489(0): WORK COMPLETED 1 ) Contracts: The applicant hired a contractor, Mountain Constructors, Inc. , P.O. Box 405. Platteville, CO 80538 (970) 786-6161 . Invoice attached to project worksheet for work performed 10-2 through 10-14, 2013 = $86,984.48. Original bid was $ 146,000 but Weld County reduced work to be performed in contract (placing asphalt with Force account labor, equipment and materials) because contractor could not complete work as quickly as Weld County needed the work to be completed to open the road. Hauled and dumped with (975.07 CY) Rip —Rap in lieu of borrow material to fill in roadway void in travel lane and shoulder embankment. It was necessary to fill the void with larger stone in order to quickly facilitate restoration of the facility under saturated soil flooding conditions. The contractor invoiced the applicant for the rip rap stone as the same unit price which was quoted in their bid of $30/CY for embankment (granular fill). Filled in roadway void in travel lane and shoulder embankment with (606.76 TNS. 303.4 CY) Aggregate base course cost (placed and compacted). Total Fill Materials = 975.07 CY + 303.4 CY = 1278.5 CY The project specialist compared the repair cost for labor and construction of similar roadway repairs with the bid and subsequent invoice received from Mountain Constructors, Inc. for $86,984.48 and found the repair estimate to be reasonable. Scope of Work: The applicant hired an environmental consulting firm to prepare application for ACOE Section 404 Nationwide permit. Tiglas Ecological Services. 5015 Swainsona Drive, Loveland. CO 80537. Invoice attached to project worksheet for work performed 9-29-2013 = $445.00 Total Contracts: $87,429.48 2) Force Account: The applicant utilized force account labor, equipment and materials to install (289. 16 tons) of asphaltic material on roadway. Labor - $6,706.73 Equipment- $5,476.88 Materials - $ 11 ,277.24 Asphalt Specialties The project specialist compared the repair cost for construction of similar CDOT roadway repairs with the Applicant's force account labor. equipment and materials found the repair estimate to be reasonable. CDOT Item Number 403-33741 Hot Bituminous Pavement (Grading S) (75) (PG-64-22) = $81 . 70/ton x 289. 16 TNS = $23,624.37 (In Place) Compared with Force Account = $23,530.93 (Applicant installed asphalt in excess of 9 inches deep within validated roadway ground area, 289. 16 tons, Project specialist validated 271 .2 tons of asphalt. quantity of material validated within 10% and considered reasonable. ) Applicant utilized force account labor to install 16 LF of 18" CMP (CDOT Item Number 603-10180 In place) x $48.49/LF = $775.84 https://isource.fema.net/emmie/dispatch Destination.do?menuTile=&topTile=dsHeader&bott... 8/6/2014 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 5 of 16 Total Materials: $ 12,053.08 Project Notes 1 . Following the September 2013 flooding , applicant used contract services and/or force account resources to re-open roads/bridges and repair damage as soon as possible. At several damage sites. repairs appear to have returned the facility to its pre-disaster design , function and capacity with no known remaining work to be completed. However at other sites due to the onset of winter conditions, applicant was unable to complete the restoration, thus leaving work to be completed. Finally. at some sites, applicant has expressed concern that unanticipated work may be still be required as a result of conditions beyond their control. such as possible subsequent settlement resulting from saturated soil conditions following the flood or where high water levels or erosion/deposition prevented a complete damage assessment. 2. This PW addresses all validated flood related damages at the specified site. including completed work and work to be completed (which damages were known to the applicant and reported to FEMA by the effective date of this PW). In the event that applicant identifies subsequent, currently unknown flood related damage at such site. applicant is advised to contact the State of Colorado Office of Emergency Management to report the damage and request an inspection prior to its repair. In the event that the State validates the damage as a direct result of the September 2013 flooding, the State will request FEMA prepare a version of this PW to address the eligible cost of repair. 3. Applicant has substantially completed the work but will not have cost data available within the fourteen day Pocket Guide rule. Per Field Operations Pocket Guide, Section 7, Cost Estimates, Page 26, "If the applicant has not produced cost data within two weeks of the site inspection, the Project Specialist will prepare the PW on the basis of an estimate for the work accomplished". Applicant, CO State representative and FEMA personnel jointly conducted all inspections and agreed to use CDOT costs for in-place costs to derive estimates on this project worksheet. Applicant understands that all actual support documentation. invoices, FA records. contract and proof of payment will be required for final reconciliation and or closeout process. 4. Pursuant to 44 CFR 13.42. Grantees and Subgrantees are required to retain records, including source documentation. to support expenditures/costs incurred against the grant award, for 3 years from the date of submission to FEMA of the final Financial Status Report. 5. The applicant must obtain all required federal , state, and local permits prior to the commencement of work. 6. The subgrantee is requesting direct administrative costs that are directly chargeable to this specific project. Associated eligible work is related to administration of the PA project only and in accordance with 44 CFR 13.22. These costs are treated consistently and uniformly as direct costs in all federal awards and other subgrantee activities and are not included in any approved indirect costs. 7. Project was reviewed for 406 Hazard Mitigation and a copy of 406 HMP proposal is attached with this project. 8. The applicant is aware that all projects are subject to an insurance https://isource.fema.net/emmie/dispatchDestination.do?menutl ile=&topTile=dsHeader&bolt. .. 8/6/2014 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 6 of 16 review as stated in 44 C. F.R. Sections 206.252 and 206.253. If applicable, an insurance determination will be made either as anticipated proceeds or actual proceeds in accordance with the applicant's insurance policy that may affect the total amount of the project. 9. The applicant is required to adhere to State and Federal Government Procurement rules and regulations and maintain adequate records to support the basis for all purchasing of goods and materials and contracting services for projects approved under the Public Assistance program, as stated in 44 CFR 13.36. The applicant has advised they have followed their normal procurement procedures. Hazard Mitigation Plan is Attached Hazard Mitigation Proposal Is effective mitigation feasible on this site? Yes If you answered Yes to the above question, the next question is required Will mitigation be performed on this site? Yes If you answered Yes to the above question, the next question is required Do you wish to attach a Hazard Mitigation Yes Proposal? If you answered Yes to the above question, the next two questions are required 406 Hazard Mitigation Plan Work To Be Completed The applicant has indicated that the installation of turf reinforcement mat on the roadside shoulders and embankment slopes will re-direct channel flow across the slopes reducing erosion at the facility and alleviating future damages. 1 ) Turf Reinforcement Mat — 362 ft + 19 ft = 381 ft in length x 15 ft in width within the right of way = 635 SY x 1 .2 factor for toe in excess of material = 762 SY x $10.00/SY Please provide the Scope of Work for the (CDOT Avg. Unit Price furnished and installed) = $7,620.00 estimate: This HMP is considered cost effective per FEMA Disaster (maximum 4000 characters) Assistance Policy 9526. 1 . Section VII . B. 2. Certain mitigation measures (Appendix A). determined cost effective. as long as the mitigation measure does not exceed 100% of the eligible cost of the eligible repair work on the project. Appendix A. 5. Gabion baskets, rip rap, sheet piling, and geotextile fabric installation- installation to control erosion. The net cost of mitigation/cost of damages is 7% < 100%. This HMP is for cost estimating purposes only. The Final design is the obligation of the Applicant and/or their agent. Would you like to add the Hazard Mitigation No Proposal as a cost line item to the project cost? GIS Coordinates Project Location Latitude Longitude CR 20.5 east of Boulder Creek 40. 13887 - 105.00048 between CR 5 and CR 7 https://isource. fema.net/emmie/dispatchDestination.do?menuTi le=&topTi le=dsHeader&bolt. .. 8/6/2014 p Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 7 of 16 Special Considerations 1 . Does the damaged facility or item of work have insurance coverage and/or is it an insurable Yes risk (e.g. . buildings, equipment. vehicles, etc)? If you would like to make any comments, please enter them below. (maximum 4000 characters) On file at the JFO 2. Is the damaged facility located within a floodplain or coastal high hazard area and/or does it No have an impact on a floodplain or wetland? If you would like to make any comments, please enter them below. (maximum 4000 characters) Flood Map 08013C0300J 3. Is the damaged facility or item of work located within or adjacent to a Coastal Barrier No Resource System Unit or an Otherwise Protected Area? 4. Will the proposed facility repairs/reconstruction change the pre-disaster conditions (e.g. . No footprint, material , location. capacity, use of function )? 5. Does the applicant have a hazard mitigation proposal or would the applicant like technical Yes assistance for a hazard mitigation proposal? If you would like to make any comments. please enter them below. (maximum 4000 characters) HMP Attached to Back Up 6. Is the damaged facility on the National Register of Historic Places or the state historic No listing? Is it older than 50 years? Are there more, similar buildings near the site? 7. Are there any pristine or undisturbed areas on. or near, the project site? Are there large No tracts of forestland? 8. Are there any hazardous materials at or adjacent to the damaged facility and/or item of No work? 9. Are there any other environmental or controversial issues associated with the damaged Yes facility and/or item of work? If you would like to make any comments, please enter them below. (maximum 4000 characters) EHP Review will be conducted Attachments User Date Document Description Hard Copy File File Name Action Type Reference KATHLEEN 01 -20- Firmette - WELCO06 - Firmette. pdf BROWN 2014 Floodplain Map (369.83 kb) View For Category C, D, E, F, and G Projects only Is effective mitigation feasible on this project? Yes If you answered Yes to the above question, the next question is required Will mitigation be performed on any sites in this Yes project? If you answered Yes to the above question, the next question is required Do you wish to attach a Hazard Mitigation Yes Proposal? If you answered Yes to the above question, the next two questions are required https://i source.fema.net/emmie/dispatchDestination.do?menuTi le=&topTile=dsHeader&bott... 8/6/2014 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 8 of 16 02/07/14 - Brian W. Drost. 406 Specialist - Revised HMP: 406 Hazard Mitigation Plan Work To Be Completed The applicant has indicated that the installation of turf reinforcement mat on the roadside shoulders and embankment slopes will re-direct channel flow across the slopes reducing erosion at the facility and alleviating future damages. 1 ) Turf Reinforcement Mat — 362 ft + 19 ft = 381 ft in length x 15 ft in width within the right of way = 635 SY x Please provide the Scope of Work 1 .2 factor for toe in excess of material = 762 SY x $ 10.00/SY for the estimate: (CDOT Avg. Unit Price furnished and installed) = $7,620.00 This HMP is considered cost effective per FEMA Disaster Assistance Policy 9526. 1 . Section VII . B. 1 . Certain mitigation measures (Appendix A). determined cost effective, as long as the mitigation measure does not exceed 15% of the eligible cost of the eligible repair work on the project. The net cost of mitigation/cost of damages is 6.82% ($7,620/ $111 ,666.20). This HMP is for cost estimating purposes only. The Final design is the obligation of the Applicant and/or their agent. Would you like to add the Hazard Mitigation Yes Proposal as a cost line item to the project cost? Hazard Mitigation Proposal - 0909 # Code Material and/or Description Unit Unit of Unit Price Subgrant Type Cost Estimate Action Quantity Measure Budget Class **'F Version 0 'k't* 1 9999 Turf reinforcement mat 762 SY $ 10.00 $ 7.620.00 Total Cost: $ 7,620.00 Comments Attachments User Date Document Description Hard Copy File File Name Action Type Reference KATHLEEN 02-05- Mitigation Weld County CAT C CR 20.5 East RUVARAC 2014 Proposal of Boulder Creek_HMP.pdf(59.35 View kb) Cost Estimate Is this Project Worksheet for (Preferred) Repair Sequence Code Material and/or Unit Unit of Unit Price Subgrant Type Cost Action Description Quantity Measure Budget Class Estimate *** Version 0 *** Other 1 0000 Work Completed Other $ 0.00 2 9003 Contract Costs 1 LS 87,429.48 CONTRACTUAL Other $ 87,429.48 https://isource.fema.net/emmie/dispatchDestination.do?menuTile=&topTile=dsHeader&bott. .. 8/6/2014 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 9 of 16 3 9007 Labor 1 LS 6, 706.76 PERSONNEL Other $ 6, 706.76 4 9008 Equipment 1 LS 5,476.88 EQUIPMENT Other $ 5,476.88 5 9009 Material 1 LS 12,053.08 SUPPLIES Other S 12,053.08 6 0000 Work to be Completed Other $ 0.00 Direct 7 9901 Administrative 1 LS $ INDIRECT Other $ 1 ,000.00 Costs 1 ,000.00 CHARGES (Subgrantee) Total Cost : $ 112,666.20 Insurance Adjustments (Deductibles, Proceeds and Settlements) - 5900/5901 Subgrant Se quence Code Material and/or Unit Unit of Unit Cost Description Quantity Measure Price Budget TypeEstimate Action Class Total Cost : $ 0.00 Hazard Mitigation Proposal - 0909 Subgrant Se uence Code Material and/or Unit Unit of Unit Cost q Description Quantity Measure Price Budget Type Estimate Action Class *** Version 0 *'t* 1 9999 Turf reinforcement mat 762 SY $ 10.00 $ 7,620.00 Total Cost : $ 7,620.00 Total Cost Estimate: $ 120,286.20 (Preferred Estimate Type + Insurance Adjustments + Hazaro Mitigation Proposal) Comments Attachments User Date Document Description Hard Copy File File Name Action Type Reference KATHLEEN 02-05- WELCO06 Cost Est. Section RUVARAC 2014 Invoice - Contract Materials.pdf View ( 1 .61 Mb) KATHLEEN 02-05- WELCO06 Contract View RUVARAC 2014 Provisions .pdf( 1 .98 Mb) KATHLEEN 02-05- WELCO06 Force Account DAC - View RUVARAC 2014 Estimate.pdf(221 .82 kb) Existing Insurance Information Insurance Type Policy No. Bldg/Property Content Insurance Deductible Years Amount Amount Amount Amount Required https://isource.fema.net/emmie/dispatchDestination.do?menuTile=&topTile=dsHeader&bott.. . 8/6/2014 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 10 of 16 Comments On file at JFO Attachments Comments and Attachments Name of Section Comment Attachment Project Description WELCO06 Location Map CR20.pdf Photos.pdf Special Considerations WELCO06 - Firmette.pdf Mitigation Weld County CAT C CR 20.5 East of Boulder Creek HMP.pdf WELCO06 Cost Est. Section Invoice - Contract Materials.pdf Cost Estimate WELCO06 Contract Provisions .pdf WELCO06 Force Account DAC - Estimate.pdf Insurance Information On file at JFO Form 90-91 WELCO06 DDD SOW.pdf Signed by Applicant WELCO06 CR 20.5 PW.pdf Application Level Procurement Policy in Effect til Jan 7 2014.pdf Bid documents Bridge 20.5-WCR 5 to 7.pdf Bundle Reference # (Amendment #) Date Awarded PA-08-CO-4145-State-0031 (30) 02-14-2014 Subgrant Application - FEMA Form 90-91 Note: The Effective Cost Share for this application is 75% FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY PROJECT WORKSHEET DISASTER PROJECT NO. PA ID NO. DATE CATEGORY WELCO06 123-99123- 02-06-2014 C FEMA 4145 - DR -CO 00 APPLICANT: WELD (COUNTY) WORK COMPLETE AS OF. 11 -14-2013 : 95 Site 1 of 1 DAMAGED FACILITY: COUNTY: Weld CR 20.5 east of Boulder Creek LOCATION: LATITUDE: LONGITUDE: 40. 13887 -105.00048 PA-08-CO-4145-P W-00489(0): CR 20.5 east of Boulder Creek DAMAGE DESCRIPTION AND DIMENSIONS: PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00489(0): During the incident period of September 11 , 2013 to September 30, 2013, Weld County, Colorado received heavy rainfall and debris in the creeks, streams and rivers which caused damage to numerous roads and bridges in Weld County. This project worksheet addresses damages to CR 20.5 between CR 5 and CR 7, in Section 16, T2N, R68W. https://isource.fema.net/emmie/dispatch Desti nation.do`?menuTi le=&topTi le=dsHeader&bott... 8/6/2014 p Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 1 1 of 16 On November 14, 2013, Kathleen Ruvarac, FEMA TAC Bridge Specialist, David Ray, FEMA Hazard Mitigation Specialist, Gary Moore, FEMA Environmental, Historical, Preservation Specialist, and Donald Dunker, Weld County Public Works Engineer, performed a site investigation at this location to document damages. The road was open and repairs completed at the time of inspection. One asphalt patch on roadway measured 362 ft in length x 13 ft in width = 4,706 SF x 0.75 ft in depth = 3,529.50 CF x 146 LB/CF x 1 ton/2000 LB = 257.7 TNS asphalt A second asphalt patch on roadway measured 19 ft in length x 13 ft in width x 0.75 ft in depth = 185.25 CF x 146 LB/CF x 1 ton/2000 LB = 13.5 TNS asphalt Total: 271 .2 TNS asphalt were validated with asphalt thickness of 9 inches. Embankment Material lost in roadway void in the westbound travel lane and on north shoulder measuring 362 ft in length x 15 ft in width x 6 ft in depth =1 ,206.7 CY and 19 ft in length x 15 ft in width x 6 ft in depth = 63.3 CY, totaling 1 ,270 CY. 16 LF of 18" CMP washed away from the site and was not recovered. The Applicant has provided pictures of the facility dated 9-16-2013 documenting damages. These photos are attached to this project worksheet. SCOPE OF WORK: PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00489(0): WORK COMPLETED 1 ) Contracts: The applicant hired a contractor, Mountain Constructors, Inc., P.O. Box 405, Platteville, CO 80538 (970) 786-6161 . Invoice attached to project worksheet for work performed 10-2 through 10-14, 2013 = $86,984.48. Original bid was $146,000 but Weld County reduced work to be performed in contract (placing asphalt with Force account labor, equipment and materials) because contractor could not complete work as quickly as Weld County needed the work to be completed to open the road. Hauled and dumped with (975.07 CY) Rip —Rap in lieu of borrow material to fill in roadway void in travel lane and shoulder embankment. It was necessary to fill the void with larger stone in order to quickly facilitate restoration of the facility under saturated soil flooding conditions. The contractor invoiced the applicant for the rip rap stone as the same unit price which was quoted in their bid of $30/CY for embankment (granular fill). Filled in roadway void in travel lane and shoulder embankment with (606.76 TNS, 303.4 CY) Aggregate base course cost (placed and compacted). Total Fill Materials = 975.07 CY + 303.4 CY = 1278.5 CY The project specialist compared the repair cost for labor and construction of similar roadway repairs with the bid and subsequent invoice received from Mountain Constructors, Inc. for $86,984.48 and found the repair estimate to be reasonable. The applicant hired an environmental consulting firm to prepare application for ACOE Section 404 Nationwide permit, Tiglas Ecological Services, 5015 Swainsona Drive, Loveland, CO 80537. Invoice attached to project worksheet for work performed 9-29-2013 = $445.00 Total Contracts: $87,429.48 2) Force Account: The applicant utilized force account labor, equipment and materials to install (289.16 tons) of asphaltic material on roadway. Labor - $6,706.73 Equipment- $5,476.88 Materials - $11 ,277.24 Asphalt Specialties The project specialist compared the repair cost for construction of similar CDOT roadway repairs with the Applicant's force account labor, equipment and materials found the repair estimate to be reasonable. CDOT Item Number 403-33741 Hot Bituminous Pavement (Grading S) (75) (PG-64-22) = $81 .70/ton x 289.16 TNS = $23,624.37 (In Place) Compared with Force Account = $23,530.93 (Applicant installed asphalt in excess of 9 inches deep within validated roadway ground area, 289.16 tons, Project specialist validated 271 .2 tons of asphalt, quantity of material validated within 10% and considered reasonable.) Applicant utilized force account labor to install 16 LF of 18" CMP (CDOT Item Number 603-10180 In place) x $48.49/LF = $775.84 Total Materials: $12,053.08 Project Notes 1 . Following the September 2013 flooding, applicant used contract services and/or force account resources to re-open roads/bridges and repair damage as soon as possible. At several damage sites, repairs appear to have returned the facility to its pre-disaster design, function and capacity with no known remaining work to be completed. However at other sites due to the onset of winter conditions, applicant was unable to complete the restoration, thus leaving work to be completed. Finally, at some sites, applicant has expressed concern that unanticipated work may be still be required as a result of conditions beyond their control, such as possible subsequent settlement resulting from saturated soil conditions following the flood or where high water levels or erosion/deposition prevented a complete damage assessment. 2. This PW addresses all validated flood related damages at the specified site, including completed work and work to be completed (which damages were known to the applicant and reported to FEMA by the effective date of this PW). In the event that applicant identifies subsequent, currently unknown flood related damage at such site, applicant is advised to contact the State of Colorado Office of Emergency Management to report the damage and request an inspection prior to its repair. In the event that the State validates the damage as a direct result of the September 2013 flooding, the State will request FEMA prepare a version of this PW to address the eligible cost of repair. https://isource.fema.net/emmie/dispatchDestination.do?menuTile=&topTile=dsHeader&bott... 8/6/2014 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 12 of 16 3. Applicant has substantially completed the work but will not have cost data available within the fourteen day Pocket Guide rule. Per Field Operations Pocket Guide, Section 7. Cost Estimates, Page 26, "If the applicant has not produced cost data within two weeks of the site inspection, the Project Specialist will prepare the PW on the basis of an estimate for the work accomplished". Applicant, CO State representative and FEMA personnel jointly conducted all inspections and agreed to use CDOT costs for in-place costs to derive estimates on this project worksheet. Applicant understands that all actual support documentation, invoices, FA records, contract and proof of payment will be required for final reconciliation and or closeout process. 4. Pursuant to 44 CFR 13.42, Grantees and Subgrantees are required to retain records, including source documentation, to support expenditures/costs incurred against the grant award, for 3 years from the date of submission to FEMA of the final Financial Status Report. 5. The applicant must obtain all required federal, state, and local permits prior to the commencement of work. 6. The subgrantee is requesting direct administrative costs that are directly chargeable to this specific project. Associated eligible work is related to administration of the PA project only and in accordance with 44 CFR 13.22. These costs are treated consistently and uniformly as direct costs in all federal awards and other subgrantee activities and are not included in any approved indirect costs. 7. Project was reviewed for 406 Hazard Mitigation and a copy of 406 HMP proposal is attached with this project. 8. The applicant is aware that all projects are subject to an insurance review as stated in 44 C.F.R. Sections 206.252 and 206.253. If applicable, an insurance determination will be made either as anticipated proceeds or actual proceeds in accordance with the applicant's insurance policy that may affect the total amount of the project. 9. The applicant is required to adhere to State and Federal Government Procurement rules and regulations and maintain adequate records to support the basis for all purchasing of goods and materials and contracting services for projects approved under the Public Assistance program, as stated in 44 CFR 13.36. The applicant has advised they have followed their normal procurement procedures. Hazard Mitigation Plan is Attached Does the Scope of Work change the pre-disaster conditions at the site? Yes No Special Considerations included? Yes No Hazard Mitigation proposal included? Yes Is there insurance coverage on this facility? Yes No No PROJECT COST ITEM CODE NARRATIVE QUANTITY/UNIT UNIT PRICE COST " Version 0 *'`* Other 1 0000 Work Completed 0/LS $ 0.00 $ 0.00 2 9003 Contract Costs 1 /LS $ 87.429.48 $ 87,429.48 3 9007 Labor 1 /LS $ 6,706.76 $ 6,706.76 4 9008 Equipment 1 /LS $ 5,476.88 $ 5,476.88 5 9009 Material 1 /LS $ 12,053.08 $ 12.053.08 6 0000 Work to be Completed 0/LS $ 0.00 $ 0.00 7 9901 Direct Administrative Costs 1 /LS $ 1 ,000.00 $ 1 ,000.00 (Subgrantee) 8 0909 Hazard Mitigation Proposal 1 /LS $ 7,620.00 $ 7,620.00 TOTAL COST $ 120,286.20 PREPARED BY KATHLEEN RUVARAC TITLE TAC BRIDGE SPECIALIST SIGNATURE APPLICANT REP. Roy Rudisill TITLE Director - OEM SIGNATURE WELD (COUNTY) : PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00489 Conditions Information Review Name Condition Type Condition Name Description Monitored i Status littps://isource.fema.net/emmie/dispatchDestination.do?menuTi le=&topTi le=dsHeader&bott. .. 8/6/2014 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 13 of 16 This review does not address all federal, state and local requirements. Acceptance of federal funding requires Standard recipient to comply with all Final Review Other (EHP) Condition #2 federal. state and local laws. No Approved Failure to obtain all appropriate federal, state and local environmental permits and clearances may jeopardize federal funding. Any change to the approved Standard scope of work will require re- Final Review Other (EHP) Condition #1 evaluation for compliance No Approved with NEPA and other Laws and Executive Orders. The applicant must coordinate with the local Final Review Other (EHP) NEPA Condition floodplain manager to obtain No Approved and comply with appropriate floodplain management permits. Gravel/borrow materials for work to be completed must be obtained from one of the National Historic following pre-approved Final Review Other (EHP) Preservation Act sources: (SHPO approved No Approved (NHPA) source. CO Licensed Pit, commercial source, contractor or county Stockpiles). Applicant is responsible for Executive Order coordinating with the local floodplain manager. All Final Review Other (EHP) 11988 - required permits should be No Approved Floodplains maintained as part of the permanent record . Applicant shall. to the extent Final Review Other (EHP) Endangered possible, adhere to the No Approved Species Act (ESA) attached conservation measures. If ground disturbing activities occur during construction, applicant will monitor ground Standard disturbance and if any Final Review Other (EHP) Condition #3 potential archeological No Approved resources are discovered, will immediately cease construction in that area and notify the State and FEMA. This review does not address all federal, state and local Standard requirements. Acceptance of EHP Review Other (EHP) federal funding requires No Recommended Condition #2 recipient to comply with all federal , state and local laws. Failure to obtain all hops://isource.fema.net/emmie/dispatchDestination.do?menuTi le=&topTi le=dsHeader&bott.. . 8/6/2014 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 14 of 16 appropriate federal, state and local environmental permits and clearances may jeopardize federal funding. Any change to the approved Standard scope of work will require re- EHP Review Other (EHP) Condition #1 evaluation for compliance No Recommended with NEPA and other Laws and Executive Orders. The applicant must coordinate with the local EHP Review Other (EHP) NEPA Condition floodplain manager to obtain No Recommended and comply with appropriate floodplain management permits. Gravel/borrow materials for work to be completed must be obtained from one of the National Historic following pre-approved EHP Review Other (EHP) Preservation Act sources: (SHPO approved No Recommended (NHPA) source, CO Licensed Pit, commercial source, contractor or county Stockpiles). Applicant is responsible for Executive Order coordinating with the local floodplain manager. All EHP Review Other (EHP) 11988 - required permits should be No Recommended Floodplains maintained as part of the permanent record . Applicant shall , to the extent EHP Review Other EHP) Endangered possible, adhere to the ( Species Act (ESA) attached conservation No Recommended measures. If ground disturbing activities occur during construction, applicant will monitor ground Standard disturbance and if any EHP Review Other (EHP) Condition #3 potential archeological No Recommended resources are discovered. will immediately cease construction in that area and notify the State and FEMA. Internal Comments No. Queue User Date/Time Reviewer Comments Award 02- 14-2014 6 Review SYSTEM 03:47 PM ACCEPTED GMT Award PEVAN 02- 14-2014 5 Review RONALD 02:58 PM Approved GMT Note:Applicant has substantially completed the work but will not have cost data available within the fourteen day Pocket Guide rule. Final Reviewer finds eligible the application and https://isource.fema.net/emmie/dispatchDestination.do?menuTile=&topTi le=dsHeader&bott... 8/6/2014 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 15 of 16 approves the funding of this CAT-C project worksheet based on the applicant having performed all required procurement Final PALACIO 02- 12-2014 procedures, perform all required special considerations 4 Review JOSE 03:43 PM recommendations such as permits to address EHP GMT considerations and securing all actual cost documentation for the financial reconciliation of this project. Task Force Leader- J . Palacio 02/12/2014 Category C. 95% complete. Weld County. The applicant used contract and force account labor to fill in a damaged roadway and shoulder embankment with rip rap, aggregate base, and asphalt and replaced an 18" corrugated metal culvert running under the road. Mitigation: The applicant will install a turf reinforcement mat on the road shoulder embankment to reduce future erosion. - dsharon - 02/10/2014 16:42: 19 GMT The Denver regulatory office is requiring that an emergency permit be obtained for all flood recovery work that takes place in Waters of the US. - dsharon - 02/10/2014 20:57:26 GMT Project site work is in mapped wetlands. Per 44 CFR Part 9.5 (g) Step 1 : Project repairs are determined to have no effect on floodplain or wetlands provided that the repairs remain in the existing footprint and do not impact previously undisturbed areas. No further wetlands or floodplains review is required. Project has no potential to impact the wetland function or EHP PATTERSON 02-10-2014 resources and substantially restores site to pre-disaster 3 Review MOLLY 08:59 PM condition. No further wetland review is required under the 8- GMT step process. - dsharon - 02/10/2014 16:40: 11 GMT Entire community will benefit from project completion. - dsharon - 02/10/2014 16:40:30 GMT Threatened and Endangered Species occur in this county but the type of activity proposed on this Project Worksheet has been determined to have "no effect" on this species. - dsharon - 02/10/2014 16:34:28 GMT Please add CWA comment Project is located in Zone A, FIRM panel 0802660850C dated September 28th 1982. Per 44 CFR Part 9.5 (g) Step 1 : Project repairs are determined to have no effect on floodplain or wetlands provided that the repairs remain in the existing footprint and do not impact previously undisturbed areas. No further floodplain review is required. - dsharon - 02/10/2014 16:39: 15 GMT The scope of work has been reviewed and meets the criteria of the 2013 signed Programmatic Agreement, Item III ; Sections A and G agreed to by FEMA and the SHPO. - dsharon - 02/10/2014 16:33: 12 GMT A review of the documentation provided has identified that Weld County is insured for property damages through: Colorado Counties Casualty and Property Pool. Policy Number 020412751 . This policy does not provide coverage for dams, dikes. Insurance JOHNSON 02-07-2014 bridges. culverts, roadways, streets. walks. paved surfaces. 2 Review KENNETH 10:07 PM tunnels, canals, land. GMT The insurance policy will not provide coverage for costs identified in this PW There will not an insurance reduction for this PW. The FEMA eligible damages are not to building, contents. equipment, or vehicles: therefore. there will not be an insurance commitment required. https://isource.fema.net/emmie/dispatchDestination.do?menuTile=&topTile=dsHeader&bott... 8/6/2014 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 16 of 16 02-07-2014 1 Mitigation DROST 06:21 PM The Hazard Mitigation Proposal is approved - Brian W. Drost, Review BRIAN GMT 406 Specialist https://isource.fema.net/emmie/dispatchDestination.do?menuTile=&topTile=dsHeader&bolt. . . 8/6/2014 Hello