Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20150091.tiff HEARING CERTIFICATION DOCKET NO. 2014-82.C RE: A SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT, USR14-0039, FOR ANY USE PERMITTED AS A USE BY RIGHT, ACCESSORY USE, OR USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW IN THE COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL ZONE DISTRICTS (HEAVY EQUIPMENT, TRUCKING AND TRUCK REPAIR SHOP, ALONG WITH OUTSIDE EQUIPMENTNEHICLE STORAGE AND STAGING) PROVIDED THAT THE PROPERTY IS NOT A LOT IN AN APPROVED OR RECORDED SUBDIVISION PLAT OR PART OF A MAP OR PLAN FILED PRIOR TO ADOPTION OF ANY REGULATIONS CONTROLLING SUBDIVISIONS IN THE A (AGRICULTURAL) ZONE DISTRICT— EUDEN AND BIANCA BALDERRAMA A public hearing was conducted on January 28, 2015, at 10:00 a.m., with the following present: Commissioner Barbara Kirkmeyer, Chair Commissioner Mike Freeman, Pro-Tem Commissioner Sean P. Conway Commissioner Julie A. Cozad Commissioner Steve Moreno Also present: Acting Clerk to the Board, Tisa Juanciorena Assistant County Attorney, Brad Yatabe Planning Department representative, Kim Ogle Public Works representative, Jennifer Petrik Health Department representative, Lauren Light The following business was transacted: el I hereby certify that pursuant to a notice dated September 18, 2014, and duly published September 23, 2014, in the Greeley Tribune, a public hearing was conducted on October 29, 2014, to consider the request of Euden and Bianca Balderrama, for a Site Specific Development Plan and Use by Special Review Permit, USR14-0039, for any Use permitted as a Use by Right, Accessory Use, or Use by Special Review in the Commercial or Industrial Zone Districts (heavy equipment, trucking and truck repair shop, along with outside equipment/vehicle storage and staging) provided that the property is not a lot in an approved or recorded subdivision plat or part of a map or plan filed prior to adoption of any regulations controlling subdivisions in the A (Agricultural) Zone District, at which time the Board deemed it necessary to continue the matter to December 17, 2014, to allow for consideration by the Planning Commission. Brad Yatabe, Assistant County Attorney, made this a matter of record. A public hearing was conducted on December 17, 2014, at which time Kim Ogle, Department of Planning Services, stated the applicant was requesting a continuance due to the recent death of their consultant, Larry Carroll. The Board deemed it necessary to continue matter to January 28, 2015. Brad Yatabe, Assistant County Attorney, again made this a matter of record. e Kim Ogle, Department of Planning Services, presented a brief summary of the proposal on January 28, 2015, to include reasons for the continuances and mention of the applicant's new CC.:CA,7I-t, ..., 7 2015-0091 PL2299 HEARING CERTIFICATION - EUDEN AND BIANCA BALDERRAMA (USR14-0039) PAGE 2 representative. This site is located within the three (3) mile referral area of the City of Fort Lupton which had concerns regarding annexation and the impact to CR 18 and other City streets the applicant would use. The proposed facility has 25 surrounding property owners within 500 feet, and staff has received four (4) letters of opposition with three (3) of those being from neighbors adjacent to the proposed facility. The summary of concerns are identified as truck traffic, hours of operation, noise, safety, smoke and exhaust from the trucks, safety, security, environmental issues and incompatibility. Mr. Ogle stated the applicant will be required to submit a screening plan, parking plan and a lighting plan as Conditions of Approval. This case has an active zoning violation initiated due to the operation of an active trucking business without the proper permits. If the case is approved it will correct the violation; however, if denied the property will need to be cleared of all components related to the business or the case will proceed to court. The property is proposed for the future home, farm and base of operations for the trucking company. 13 referral agencies have reviewed this case and 9 returned comments. The Planning Commission recommended denial based on the Use not being compliant with intent of the agriculture zone district, the existing surrounding land uses, or the future development of the surrounding uses. The applicant's representative has created a revised plan with suggestions to aid in the approval process and address the concerns of the surrounding property owners. Mr. Ogle reviewed photos of the property, accesses and surrounding areas. ID Jennifer Petrik, Department of Public Works, provided a brief overview of the transportation plans and requirements including road status, average daily traffic counts, and number of people and equipment accessing the site. Ms. Petrik verified certain conditions that must be met to include: show the accepted water quality feature on the map; an Improvements and Road Maintenance agreement for CR 18; a grading permit may be required; maintenance of weeds; and parking of vehicles on county roads is not allowed. la Lauren Light, Department of Public Health and Environment, reviewed the water and sewer provisions. The applicant stated they would provide commercial septic and a commercial well when the shop is constructed, until then they have agreed to provide portable toilets and bottled water. She also detailed the Dust Abatement Plan, Waste Handling Plan and noise restrictions. El Deanne Fredrickson, AGPROfessionals, represented the applicant and stated they have owned and operated from the property since 2005. Today Mr. Balderrama has 10 trucks and is requesting approval for up to 15 trucks to be able to grow his business. The applicant did not realize he needed a Use by Special Review Permit to be able to park the trucks on his property. The trucks have been moved off-site since the notice of violation and he has been cleaning up the site. The trucks are used to haul fracking sand and drivers would come to the site max 60 trips per day. The applicant is also requesting approval for a four thousand square foot shop building to be used for truck repairs, and there would be a total of two full time employees once the shop is built. Ms. Fredrickson summarized adjacent or surrounding USRs and is of the opinion that the applicant's business is a complementary fit to the community. She outlined the changes from the previous plan versus the current plan and stated the revised plan was mailed to adjacent owners explaining the changes. The site has been cleaned up and he is not actively using the property. She insisted the application for a Use by Special Review Permit is consistent with the Weld County Code and compatible to the Comprehensive Plan. She displayed photos and maps to support the applicant's efforts to comply requested approval. 2015-0091 PL2299 HEARING CERTIFICATION - EUDEN AND BIANCA BALDERRAMA (USR14-0039) PAGE 3 El In response to Commissioner Conway, Ms. Fredrickson clarified she received one call from a surrounding property owner stating the changes made were not enough. In response to Commissioner Cozad, she did speak to someone regarding annexation and it was determined the property is not eligible at this time. Further responding to Chair Kirkmeyer, she stated the property is in the three (3) mile referral area of Fort Lupton but it is not contiguous and again there is no interest to annex at this time. e Amber and Sam Cardillo, surrounding property owners located 530 feet from the proposed USR, purchased their property in 2000 and communicated their strong objection to the application. In 2008, they had a similar issue with a surrounding property owner operating a trucking business; Mr. Dexter purchased that property and has worked for two years to clean it up. The neighboring USR properties are nothing compared to having 15-17 semis coming in and out. The other trucking companies in the area have 3 trucks each, which are not semis. 17 semis, seven days a week, will cause dust, noise, diesel fumes from starting and idling, etc. Mr. Cardillo also expressed his concern with future water related issues regarding natural drainage patterns and the possible affect to his personal well. In response to the portable toilets, he is concerned human waste will be another issue with 17 people on-site, not to mention the unsightly view of port-a-lets 200 feet from his porch, and concerns regarding the mitigation of waste disposal. Mr. Cardillo is worried they will be living in a truck stop. They are asking the leaders to protect their rights as homeowners living in a community currently zoned Agriculture. In response to Commissioner Cozad, Mr. Cardillo stated the applicant has moved the trucks temporarily, but it doesn't change the impact the business will have on surrounding property owners should it be approved. In response to Chair Kirkmeyer, Mr. Cardillo pointed out the location of the greyhound kennels in relation to their property and stated the noise and other issues from the kennels are not comparable to the proposed trucking business. Fl Dale Dexter, neighbor, took the advice of familiarizing himself with the County Code, and shared his experience of purchasing his property in 2012 and performing extensive cleanup after the trucking business moved out. He concluded this USR does not coincide with the Weld County code, mentioned historical rejections of similar cases, and clarified he did not receive a letter. The zoning has not been changed to commercial or industrial, it remains agricultural. He listed his concerns with exhaust smoke to include questionable mitigation, and the impact and hazards to the environment, livestock and residents. Mr. Dexter reiterated that the request for 15 trucks does not meet the requirements of a USR in that area zoned agriculture, and now with the possible environmental hazards created from additional semi trucks, it further limits his own use of his property regarding the dangers to livestock. As responsible neighbors, the concern is that certain requirements will not be met once approved and the County will not be present to enforce the obligations of the applicant. In conclusion, he applauded the business aspect but encouraged them to move the business to an area that is zoned commercial/industrial. F1 Commissioner Moreno expressed his appreciation for Mr. Dexter's comments and agreed it is a difficult situation. 2015-0091 PL2299 HEARING CERTIFICATION - EUDEN AND BIANCA BALDERRAMA (USR14-0039) PAGE 4 e Chair Kirkmeyer called for a ten minute recess at 11:54 a.m., and reconvened at 12:02 p.m. Fl Ms. Fredrickson to the public input by stating that the applicant now has 10 trucks and is asking for 15 trucks, and is not asking to change the zoning. She stated the applicant will be subject to numerous Conditions of Approval and Development Standards, and they have done everything possible to mitigate the impact of the business to include screening, a nine acre easement, and the agreement to use block heaters in the winter to reduce idling time. In response to Chair Kirkmeyer, she stated the applicant is asking for a total of 15 trucks at total buildout. El In response to Commissioner Cozad, Ms. Fredrickson confirmed the applicant would be willing to reduce the number of hours on the weekend if it meant approval. Also in response to Commissioner Cozad regarding emissions regulations, Ms. Light clarified state ratios referencing odor emissions and biosolids emissions and concluded that these are addressed in the Development Standards. Fl In response to Commissioner Moreno, Mr. Ogle conveyed the date of violation as April, 2013, and stated the complaint probably came in a couple months prior to that with no other recorded prior complaints. Fl Commissioner Cozad expressed her appreciation to the neighbors for their participation in the process and her supportive stance to the applicant because of the revisions to the application since the hearing at Planning Commission. She further conveyed the Conditions of Approval and Development Standards are a tool available to the surrounding property owners to use for mitigation. Commissioner Cozad suggested a change to Development Standard #3 regarding the hours of operation. The change would reflect 6:00 a.m. - 10:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, and 8:00 a.m. - 10:00 p.m. Saturday through Sunday. The remaining Commissioners concurred. II Chair Kirkmeyer agreed with Commissioners Cozad and Moreno regarding the difficulty of this case, and expressed being more inclined to agree with Mr. Dexter and the Cardillos. Being a fellow homeowner in unincorporated Weld County, she reiterated that landowners are asked to tolerate a lot of issues affecting their personal property rights. She will not be supporting the application. El Commissioner Freeman clarified the dates of purchases among the property owners and the high number of existing traffic counts in relation to the additional traffic proposed by the application. He expressed his opinion that the applicant's business does fit in to the community and he will be supporting the request. Fl Commissioner Moreno stated his position to support the USR. 2015-0091 PL2299 HEARING CERTIFICATION - EUDEN AND BIANCA BALDERRAMA (USR14-0039) PAGE 5 le Commissioner Conway concurred that the case is a tough one and expressed there must have been a tipping point regarding growth to the business that has pushed these neighbors to object. Ms. Fredrickson clarified the applicant did begin with two trucks and has grown the business to ten trucks. El In response to Chair Kirkmeyer, Mr. Ogle clarified there is not a Development Standard limiting the number of trucks. Further, Commissioner Conway agreed the applicant has made an effort to mitigate concerns related to Planning Commission and the surrounding property owners; however, given the difficulty of the case, he remained undecided and invited his fellow Commissioners to comment further. le Chair Kirkmeyer expressed her understanding of normal traffic related to agriculture but stated the disruptive difference of semi's starting up in the mornings and idling. Commissioner Cozad concurred and suggested limiting the number of trucks to ten, and recommended adding the block heaters as a requirement in the Resolution. le Commissioner Cozad made a motion to add an additional Development Standard limiting the number of trucks to ten (10). Commissioner Moreno seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. (Clerk's Note: added as Development Standard#4.) Fl In response to Chair Kirkmeyer, Euden and Bianca Balderrama, represented by Ms. Fredrickson, indicated they have reviewed, and agree to abide by, the Conditions of Approval and Development Standards, as amended. El Commissioner Cozad moved to approve the request of Euden and Bianca Balderrama for a Site Specific Development Plan and Use by Special Review Permit, USR14-0039, for any Use permitted as a Use by Right, Accessory Use, or Use by Special Review in the Commercial or Industrial Zone Districts (heavy equipment, trucking and truck repair shop, along with outside equipment/vehicle storage and staging) provided that the property is not a lot in an approved or recorded subdivision plat or part of a map or plan filed prior to adoption of any regulations controlling subdivisions in the A (Agricultural) Zone District, with the Conditions of Approval and Development Standards as amended and entered into the record. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Freeman, and it carried with a roll call vote of 3-2 with Chair Kirkmeyer and Commissioner Conway opposed. Commissioner Conway first expressed his appreciation for the applicant's willingness to reduce the number of trucks, and second conveyed his agreement with Chair Kirkmeyer and comments of the public regarding landowner rights as being the reason for his vote of opposition. There being no further discussion, the hearing was completed at 12:29 p.m. 2015-0091 PL2299 HEARING CERTIFICATION - EUDEN AND BIANCA BALDERRAMA (USR14-0039) PAGE 6 This Certification was approved on the 2nd day of February, 2015. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COL RADO ATTESTWatedgeti ves;t.C L4 arbara Kirkmeyer, Chai�� Weld County Clerk to the Board Mike Freeman, Pro-Tem B Ai •De. �! Board. 0� �`c De.u t Clerk to the Board 'I. "' ,I\.. / e-.. Con ay ,tentft-Avila0S �_ /pp/EE t 2 t °Lsw „gel %Na wot MoD DATE o OF APPROVAL � r�I Steve 2015-0091 PL2299 L„..,,...- .r : s f:c '\. l - `lam \ i cv - r ,;i i V 1 ran t a. L. v O N a v — _ Ln _ Too y�— r� N a �. (fin ,' U \ .� 3 0 ,V � 7:7 rj �� l\.I ,� 1 F- ., r'a (A V V 7.2„) a J e� ( Ci if h u a F W 7 : _ _ - Co N. -7. v; ( r r f41. e w .i Cn J --�Cl -J C ti w +k� ` a �� T \ .) � � -1 v W C: / 1. i e j id �.V\ , `!r {�O_ '''N ate ^ � �\ �-4rrJc Hello