HomeMy WebLinkAbout20151508.tiff RESOLUTION
RE: APPROVE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION FOR
COUNTY ROAD 58 (FEMA) AND AUTHORIZE CHAIR TO SIGN
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to
Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of
administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and
WHEREAS, the Board has been presented with a Community Development Block Grant
Application for County Road 58 (FEMA) from the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and
through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, to the Colorado Department of
Public Safety, Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, commencing upon
full execution, with further terms and conditions being as stated in said application, and
WHEREAS, after review, the Board deems it advisable to approve said application, a
copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of
Weld County, Colorado, that the Community Development Block Grant Application for County
Road 58 (FEMA) from the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of
County Commissioners of Weld County, to the Colorado Department of Public Safety, Division
of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, be, and hereby is, approved.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the Chair be, and hereby is, authorized
to sign said application.
The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted
by the following vote on the 27th day of May, A.D., 2015.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
ATTEST: C/ ; /, EXCUSED
t� Barbara Kirkmeyer, Chair
Weld County Clerk to the Board
Mi<e Freeman, Pro-Tem
B : C-
D y Clerk to the oard
IE La Sean P. Conway
APPROVE AS TO FOR 1 # Q
ism to 1/40 Julie A. Cozad
County Attorney EXCUSED
(O/� � t Steve Moreno
Date of signature: ''7
2015-1508
' cer i'�C� EM0016
BC0045
Colorado Division of Homeland Security Grant NOI / Application
Emergency Management CDBG-DR Recover Colorado
Infrastructure Program
THIS SECTION FOR STATE USE ONLY
DHSEM Identification Number: Colorado Point of Contact:
CDBG-DR Program Manager
Date NOI(Part A)Received: Colorado DHSEM
9195 East Mineral Avenue,Suite 200
Date Application(Part B)Received: Centennial,Colorado 80112
Office: 720.852.6713
Date Next Steps Letter Transmitted: Fax: 720.852.6750
cdps dhsem edbg(a,state.co.us
PART A - NOI:
PROJECT OVERVIEW
I. Applicant Legal Name: Weld County, Colorado
2. Applicant
Type: ✓ Local Government n Private Non-Profit(Attach copy of 501 e3, if applicable)
3. Project Title: County Match FEMA Projects-WELCO15(574)
4. Proposed Project Total Cost: 83,658.54
CDBG-DR-1 Request: 10,457.32
5. Certifications:
The undersigned assures fulfillment of all requirements of the CDBG-DR Recover Colorado Infrastructure Program as
contained in the program guidelines and that all information contained herein is true and correct to the best of my
knowledge. The governing body of the applicant has duly authorized the document,commits to the non-Federal and State
share identified in the Budget, and hereby applies for the assistance documented in this application. Also, the applicant
understands that the project may proceed ONLY AFTER a GRANT AGREEEMENT is approved.
Mike Freeman, Pro—Tem Weld County Commissioner (970)356-4000
Teen Name of Authorized A/,phe nu Aeen, Tile Telephone.Number
NAY 2 7 7°15
.linnurure nl du,harlren Applied Agent Owe sinned
2015-1508
Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page I of 20
CMG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
PART A - NOI: APPLICANT INFORMATION
I. Applicant Legal Name:
Weld County, Colorado
2. FIRS Code: 123 DUNS Number: 07575-7955
3. U.S.Congressional District: 4th Congressman Name:
4. State Senatorial District: 1 Senator Name: Mr. Cory Gardner
5. State Legislative District: 50 Representative Name: Mr Ken Buck
6. Primary Point of Contact:
The Primary Point of Contact is the person responsible for coordinating the implementation of this proposal, if approval is
granted.
Ms. ❑ Mr.❑✓ Mrs.❑First Name: Roy Last Name: Rudisill
Title: Director Organization: Weld County Office of Emergency Managemc
Street Address: 1150 O Street
City: Greeley State: Colorado Zip Code: 80631
Telephone: ( f U) "l Fax: ( (U).S3b-f.6 Mobile: (9/(1) itd1—U E-mail Address: rrudisillco.weld.co
7. Alternate Point of Contact:
The Alternate Point of Contact is the person that can address questions or concerns in the Primary Point of Contact's
absence.
Ms. riMr.pi Misu First Name: Barb Last Name: Connolly
Title: Controller Organization: Weld County Accounting
Street Address: 1150 O Street
City: Greeley State: Colorado Zip Code: 80631
Telephone: ( /Upqh L x: lyf U)33O-f 4y Mobile: E-mail Address: bconnolly Wco.weld.
8. Application Prepared by:
Ms.n Mr.pi Mtsfl First Name: Kyle Last Name: Jones
Title: Planner Organization: ARCADIS-US
Street Address:
City: Tallahasst State: FL Zip Code: 32309
Telephone: (tl3U) Oill F.x: Mobile: (ZZb) ZU2 3 E-mail Address: kyle.ionescarcadis-
9. Authorized Applicant Agent:
Ms.[1 Mr.[1 Mts.❑First Name: Barbara Last Name: Kirkmever
Title: Commissii Organization: Weld County
Street Address: 1150 O Street, P.O. Box 758
City: Greeley State: Colorado Zip Code: 80631
Telephone: 1J U)305 F: x: Mobile: E-mail Address: bkirkmeyer((�co.well
The Authorized Applicant Agent MUST be the chief executive officer, mayor, etc. This person must be able to sign
contracts,authorize funding allocations or payments,etc.
Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 2 of 20
CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
PART A - NOI: PROJECT DESCRIPTION & NATIONAL OBJECTIVES MET
1. Project—Eligible Activity Description:
Describe the proposed project. Explain how the proposed project will address recovery and/or resilience needs in your
community either independently or as part of a larger project. Include a description of the desired outcome and the
recovery objective(s)to be achieved. This narrative should describe the CDBG-DR Eligible Activity.
In an effort to achieve resiliency from the severe storms and minimize risk to the general
public, Weld County addressed severe damage to local roadways, bridges, culverts,
removed hazardous roadway debris, made emergency repairs to paved and gravel
roadways, addressed river embankments/dangerous conditions to the public and made
repairs to emergency response vehicles that were damaged during the Incident Period.
FEMA Categories A, B, C, and E were addressed in the Weld County FEMA Match. CDBG
funds are needed to be applied towards the Weld County FEMA Local Match for the
emergency work that was identified on previously submitted Project Worksheets. All
projects covered under the Weld County Project Worksheets were vital for Weld County to
clear hazardous debris from roadways/creeks/streams and enhance their infrastructure,
river embankments, equipment and roadways. This particular NOI/Application will discuss
%Ain r`n4G IG7Al T4.n fl...;e.n+ lAIrr, .nnl in ..'44 hn.J ..nrl nn..Mi..n .tnlniln.l
2. Site/Physical Location: Describe the area(s)affected/protected by this project,including location by complete street
address and longitude and latitude(coordinates in decimal degrees).
The latitude is 40.408330 and longitude is -104.613880. The attached spreadsheet shows
the Lat/Long coordinates for all of the Project Worksheets and depicts the damage site
locations as identified in the correlating Project Worksheets. However; the area affected o
3. Population Served: Briefly describe the demographics of the population served or protected by this project. Include
the percent of the overall community population benefiting from this project. Explain your response.
An estimated 90% or more of the community benefited from the proactive work by Weld
County and the removal of hazardous debris and the emergency work/repairs made to the
roadways, bridges, equipment and culverts. The population benefiting from this Match
Project will include an LMI level population percentage that will be directly or indirectly
impacted through this project. This NOI and the associated PW impacted the entire County
and demographic area. White: 67.6%, Hispanic: 28.3%, Other: 1.6%, Asian: 1.3%, Black:
0.8%, Native American: 0.4%. Weld County consists of 99,317 households with a median
household income of$56 589 and the majority of Weld County is owner-occupied with a
4. Priority of this Project: If you are submitting more than one CDBG-DR Infrastructure NOI, what is the relative
priority of this project? Please indicate the priority as: Priority#of## Projects Submitted.
Priority 22 of 36 Projects Submitted.
Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 3 of 20
CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
PART A- NOI: CDBG-DR FUNDING QUALIFICATIONS
Community Development Block Grant— Disaster Recovery (CDRG-DR) funding can be approved for a project in which
ALL of the following requirements are met The physical location of the activity must be within a county listed in Table I of
the program Recover Colorado Infrastructure Grant Program Guidelines(Guidelines).
I. Connection to Disaster Recovery
CDRG's Disaster Recovery funds must be used for necessary expenses related to disaster relief, long-term recovery,
restoration of infrastructure and housing, economic revitalization, and mitigation from future damages.. The activity
must show a direct link to damages received during one or more of the events listed in Table I of the Guidelines. Please
provide a brief explanation of how the proposed acquisition activity: (I) was a result of the disaster event; (2) will
restore infrastructure or revitalize the economy; or will(3)mitigate future damages.
During the incident period of September 11, 2013 to September 30, 2013, Weld County,
Colorado received heavy rainfall and debris in the creeks, streams and rivers which caused
surface gravel removal and scour damage to numerous roads and bridges in Weld County.
This NOI Application request addresses emergency work and the damages that were a
a
2. Compliance with National Objectives
State recipients receiving allocations under the CDBG-DR program must certify that their projected use of funds
will ensure, and maintain evidence, that each of its activities assisted with CDBG-DR funds meets at least one of
the three National Objectives.
a) Which of the National Objectives are met by proposed project?
Will benefit low and moderate income(LMI)persons;or
riWill aid in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight;or
riIs an Urgent Need in which meet community development needs having a particular urgency because
existing conditions pose a serious and immediate threat to the health or welfare of the community where
other financial resources are not available to meet such needs.
b) flow will the proposed project meet the above checked National Objective(s).
See attached LMI data for the Project.
In addition to the LMI data attached, the State of Colorado (according to ACS
2008-2012 5Y) lists Weld County at a 41.0% LMI. In reviewing the LMI data for this
Project NOI, the PW associated LMI % was 48.70%. However, this percentage does not
accurately capture the total number of service areas that are either directly or indirectly
impacted by the FEMA Match Projects. The entire community benefited from the
proactive emergency work by Weld County and the removal of hazardous debris and
the work/repairs made to the roadways, bridges, equipment and culverts thus the
County believes that a higher LMI % should be given for this FEMA match Projects.
The general vicinity of FEMA Match Projects encompasses the entire County and
greatly benefits the entire LMI population for this project, which is why the County
believes that this project not only meets, but exceeds the 50% requirement for meeting
the National Objective. The emergency work/repairs that were made under the WELCO
PW's for the Local FEMA Match drastically reduced hazardous conditions for the
general public and enabled Weld County to focus on resiliency efforts post storm. It is
believed that the service area for Project Site Locations benefited multiple LMI tract
sections and thus a higher weighted percentage of over 50% should be noted for this p
Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 4 of 20
CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
3. Compliance with the primary objective. As indicated in the Guidelines: "A proposed project's benefits to LMI
persons will be an important factor in evaluating potential infrastructure projects. A total of 20% of the Recover
Colorado Infrastructure project funding must benefit LMI persons. Due to the very low percentage of LMI projects
submitted in the first round of infrastructure funding, it is estimated that approximately 25% to 30% of the funding
available in this second allocation must meet the LMI requirement to make up for the deficit."
This section does not need to he completed if,the project does not meet this National Objective.
The primary objective for using CMG Disaster Recovery funds is benefitting,by at least 51 percent,persons of low and
moderate income. The following section provides the information necessary to complete this requirement.
a) Is the proposed activity: 0,l-jurisdiction wide II specified target area
If you checked specified target area,which data source was used? (Note:select the smallest unit of Census data that
encompasses your proposed target area.)
b) Enter the number of households involved in the proposed project. 99,317
c) In the space below,describe how the applicant will comply with the requirement that at least 51 percent of CDBG-DR
dollars will principally benefit low-and moderate-income households and persons.
Weld County will comply with the 51% requirement due to the fact that the PW
associated under this NOI Project for the FEMA County Match is targeted to areas of the
county that qualify as LMI. The justification behind this methodology is that multiple o
d) Enter the number of households within each income category expected to benefit from the proposed project.
Incomes above 80%of the County Median 785
Incomes above 50%and up to 80%of the County Median 1265
Incomes at or below 50%of the County Median 2060
e) Which type of income was used to determine the above? (Check only one)
riAs determined by the American Community Survey (Public Facilities projects)
nAnnual income as defined for Public Housing and Section 8
7 Annual income as reported under the Census long form
nAdjusted gross income as defined for reporting under IRS
Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 5 of 20
CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
PART A - NOI: COMPREHENSIVE RISK ANALYSIS INFORMATION
1. Community Hazards Review: Please list and briefly describe in rank order of importance the natural or man-made
hazards in your(the Applicant's) service area.
The hazards identified within this Project for the FEMA County Match for WELCO15 (574)
would be ranked in the following manner: Flood, Erosion and Subsidence.
The hazards caused significant damage and posed a severe risk to the community for the
designated incident period.
2. High Risk Hazards Addressed by the Project:
Describe how, and the degree to which, the proposed project mitigates high risk hazards. Include damage history,source
and type of problem, frequency of event(s),and severity of damage information, if available.
Hazard 1
Flooding caused the most severe damage to Weld County during the designated incident
period and this Project addressed and mitigated against severe flood damage to local
roadways, bridges, culverts, removed hazardous debris along roadways. In addition,
County Officials ensured repairs were made to paved and gravel roadways for the safety of
the community and addressed river embankments/dangerous conditions to the public and
made repairs to emergency response vehicles that were damaged during the Incident
Period. The repairs made brought the damaged infrastructure back to its pre-disaster
condition in accordance with regulations.
Hazard 2
Erosion also caused a severe issue for the County. This Project addressed and mitigated
against severe erosion damage to local roadways, shoulders, and embankments. The work
that was conducted by the County mitigated against any immediate threat/hazard to the
damaged infrastructure and restored the infrastructure back to its pre-disaster condition in
accordance with regulations.
Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and c-mail submittal. Page 6 of 20
CDRC-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
Hazard 3
Subsidence was another critical hazard that caused dangerous conditions for the
community. This Project addressed and mitigated against severe subsidence damage to
local roadways, shoulders, bridges and embankments. The work that was conducted by the
County mitigated against any immediate threat/hazard to the damaged infrastructure and
restored the infrastructure back to its pre-disaster condition in accordance with regulations.
Note: If your proposed project addresses more than three Hazards,please provide that information as an
attachment.
3. Elimination of Risk: Does the proposed project result in the elimination of a hazard from your(the Applicant's) service
area? If so,please describe. If not,please estimate the degree to which this project will mitigate the risk from the hazards
identified in Item#2.
The Proposed FEMA Local Match for WELCO15 (574) does not completely eliminate the
hazards identified from the service area. The Proposed FEMA Match Project does allow
Weld County to receive a percentage of funds back that the County expended during one of
the most costly disasters in Colorado history however. These types of hazards that
occurred in Weld County and throughout Colorado are truly an act of mother nature and the
County was as prepared as it could have been but the severity/duration of the incident was
of an unprecedented nature. Weld County cannot eliminate the risk of future flooding,
erosion or land subsidence, but Local Officials can ensure that their community is prepared
for future incident, take the necessary precautions and that their infrastructure is restored p
4. Environmental Quality Improvements: Does the proposed project result in an improvement in the quality of the natural
environment in your(the Applicant's)service area? If so, please describe.
Yes; the damages that attributed to the designated incident period and FEMA-DR 4145
were addressed via the previously submitted PW and the work conducted to restore the
infrastructure back to its pre-disaster condition was implemented. The work done at this
site location (see previous attachment for tat/long coordinates) addressed not only
improvements/repairs made to the infrastructure, but also improvements and repairs to the
river embankments and any potential erosion or subsidence issues that could have
,.,nronnnrl if 4-1-in rn„nhi k.nrl nnk t&n-n tL.n mmnr .•th,r mnnn„rr.n +Inn+ +knit rlirl O
5. Climate Change Improvements: Does the proposed project reduce or ameliorate a projected impact of climate change
in Colorado? If so, please briefly describe the benefit of the project.
This Proposed Project reduces a projected impact climate change due to the proactive
mitigation measures that were undertaken by Weld County during the designated incident
period. This was accomplished by ensuring that the damaged site location was addressed
as soon, but as safely, as possible, and not to sustain any further impacts to the site
locations or environment that would enable the damage to enhance the projected impact of
any potential climate changes.
Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 7 of 20
CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
6. Community Process: Does the proposed project include a community planning or involvement process that increases
community resiliency? If so,please briefly describe the process.
This Proposed Project was initiated by County Officials in an effort to achieve resiliency
from the severe storms and also to minimize risk to the community, Weld County addressed
the severe flood damage to the roadways and infrastructure by ensuring that dangerous
conditions for the public were addressed and mitigated properly and efficiently.
7. Reduction in the Costs of Future Response or Recovery: Will the proposed project result in a reduction in the cost
of response or recovery from an incident occurring due to one or more of the hazards identified in Item#1 or#2? If so,
please briefly describe how response or recovery costs will be reduced.
For a small scale flooding incident, yes; however, the flooding that occurred during the
designated incident period was catastrophic and the PW associated with the NOI FEMA
Local Match Request were completed to address the damages.
S. Floodplain/Floodway/Substantially Damaged Properties: Does the proposed project include a property or
properties located in a floodway or floodplain: or not located in a regulatory floodplain but which were substantially
damaged or have a history of damage from at least two disaster events? If so, please identify those properties below.
No; the Proposed Project is for the FEMA Local Match for WELCO15 (574) from CDBG-DR
in regards to expenses from CAT C Damage Categories for the designated incident period
for FEMA-DR 4145.
9. Mitigation Planning:
Does your community have a current FEMA approved multi-hazard mitigation plan? ✓ Yes No
Location of proposed project in mitigation plan strategies: Page 139 Section/Part Mitigation Stra
Is the community a member of good standing with the National Flood Insurance Program? ✓ Yes No
Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 8 of 20
CDBC-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
10. Community Plan Compliance: Does the proposed project comply with and/or address an issue recognized in key
community plans? Key plans include,but are not limited to: a Comprehensive Master Plan,a Stormwater Management Plan,
a Hazard Mitigation Plans, or key community codes. If so, please describe how the project integrates into the plan(s).
Yes; the Proposed Project complies with all local community plans and this Project
integrates into the Plans because the County addressed the damages to local roadways
and infrastructure and mitigated damages that posed a serious risk/hazard to the
community during the incident period. This FEMA PW was initiated by Weld County and via
this Proposed Project, the County requests that CDBG funds be applied towards the local
FEMA Match for this Project.
I_ Environmental/Historic Preservation Issues: Please describe any significant environmental,historic,or cultural features
that may be affected by the project. Please also describe any features that may be improved by the project.
All environmental issues are addressed on the attached Project Worksheet as supporting
documentation. The significant EHP issues were in regards to the Endangered Species Act
(ESA) and EHP Standard Conditions. All items were addressed and supporting backup
documentation can be provided upon request.
12. Permitting: Please list the local, state,and federal permits that will be required to complete this project.
All permitting is addressed on the attached Project Worksheet as supporting
documentation. The significant permitting issues were in regards to the Endangered
Species Act (ESA) and EHP Standard Conditions. All items were addressed and
supporting backup documentation can be provided upon request. Please see below for
environmental permits that were obtained.
Floodplain Permit
Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 9 of 20
CDRG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
13. Community Resilience: Please describe how this project will increase the resilience of your community. As defined in the
Guidelines:"Resilience incorporates hazard mitigation and land use planning strategies;critical infrastructure,environmental
and cultural resource protection;and sustainability practices to reconstruct the built environment,and revitalize the economic,
social,and natural environments."
In an effort to achieve resiliency from the severe storms and minimize risk to the general
public, Weld County addressed severe damage to local roadways, bridges, culverts,
removed hazardous debris roadways, made repairs to paved and gravel roadways,
addressed river embankments/dangerous conditions to the public and made repairs to
emergency response vehicles that were damaged during the Incident Period.
This Proposed Project addresses proactive work initiated by Weld County during FEMA-DR
4145 enabled the community to recover in an expeditious manner and increased the
resilience of the community by incorporating nearly every aspect of sustainability and
revitalizing the community. The community was able to recover quicker due to the proactive
work done through this Proposed Project and the associated PW.
14. Maps
Please attach the following maps with the project site and structures marked on the map. Use SAME ID number as in
the Individual Property Worksheets.
Flood Insurance Rate Map(FIRM). lithe FIRM for your area is not published,please attach a copy of the Flood
I lazard Boundary Map(FHBM).
City or county scale map(large enough to show the entire project area)
USGS 1:24,000 topo map
Parcel Map(Tax Map, Property Identification Map,etc.)
Overview photographs.The photographs should be representative of the project area,including any relevant
streams,creeks,rivers,etc., and drainage areas which affect the project site of will be affected by the project.
15. Additional Comments(Optional): Enter any additional comments related to the proposed project's ability to reduce
hazard risk and increase community resiliency.
This proposed project reduced the hazard risk to the community and increased resiliency by
the work conducted through the PW in correlation with FEMA-DR 4145. CDBG funds are
being requested to be applied to the local FEMA Match (12.5%) for the PW.
All maps are located in project files that were previously submitted and will be provided
upon request.
The entire cnmmunity henefited from the nrnartive wnrk by Weld County and the remnval to
Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e'mail submittal. Page HI of 20
CDBC-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
PART A - NOI: DECISION MAKING PROCESS
1. Decision-Making Process:
Describe the process you used to decide that this project is the best solution to the problem. Explain why this project is
the best alternative you considered. Address questions such as:
• Arc you focusing on the area in your community that has the greatest potential for losses?
• Have you considered the risks to critical facilities and structures and benefits to be obtained by mitigating this
vulnerability'?
• Have you considered those areas or projects that present the greatest opportunities given the current situation(s)
of interest in your community?
• Arc you addressing a symptom or the source of the problem? Addressing the source of the problem is a long-term
solution which provides the most mitigation benefits.
• I f impacts to the environment,natural,cultural or historic resources have been identified,explain how your alternatives
and proposed project address,minimize,or avoid these impacts.
The Site locations within this WELCO PW in the Proposed Project were identified due to
the high dollar amount of funds that were expended by Weld County to ensure the safety of
the community and also restore county infrastructure back to its pre-disaster condition. This
Proposed Project has site locations across the entire community and service area and it
was determined that a large percentage of the LMI population was impacted by the severe
flooding incident and the proactive work by County Officials enabled the community to
recover quicker, thus allowing the community to sustain resiliency and return operations to
normal.
2. Acquisition Projects- Describe the community's methodology for selecting the properties to be acquired in this application
and how each is ranked(highest to lowest):
N/A
Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page I 1 of 20
CDC-D11 Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
PART A - NOI: SCOPE OF WORK / BUDGET OVERVIEW / FINANICAL FACTORS
1. Project Scope: Please provide a comprehensive and detailed description of the scope of the proposed project.
Describe each of the project components and the steps necessary to complete that work. If the proposed project is a
funding match for another disaster recovery or infrastructure development program, please identify the
agency, program funds,and project reference number that CDBG-DR funding is intended to support. Also
describe any critical deadlines that must be met to accomplish this work.
This Proposed Project is for the Local FEMA Match for costs for WELCO15 (574). These
costs were incurred as a result of FEMA-DR 4145. During the incident period of September
11, 2013 to September 30, 2013, Weld County, Colorado received heavy rainfall and debris
in the creeks, streams and rivers which caused severe flooding to and along roadways and
surface streets, and also severely damaged local infrastructure. This NOI Application
request addresses the emergency work / damages that were a direct result of the severe
flooding.
A Scope of Work is included within the PW and addresses the work that was completed.
2. Community Priority: Please describe why this project is a priority for your organization.
This Proposed Project is a priority for Weld County to utilize the CDBG funding as the Local
FEMA Match to offset the costs for the proactive work done by the County to reduce
hazardous conditions to the community.
Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 12 of 20
CDBC-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
3. Project Cost Summary: Please summarize the major cost components of the project. Please round all values to the
nearest dollar.
a. Planning/Engineering/Design $
b. Environmental Compliance $ The value of general and/or
c. Real Property Acquisition/Demolition $ professional labor wages must
be tabulated in accordance
d. Closing Costs/ Legal Fees $ with the Davis Bacon Act of
c. Housing Program Assistance $ 1931
f. Construction Costs $
g. Project Delivery Costs $
h. Other(specify below) $ 83,658.54
See Project Worksheet Cost (attached) i. Total of a-h $ 83,658.54
j. Duplication of Benefits(if unknown at time of application enter zero). $ 0.00
k. Subtract j. from i. to determine Total Project Cost $ 83.65854
Notes: Housing Program Assistance costs include the cost of compliance with Uniform Relocation Assistance(URA) and
Comparable Housing Assistance(CHA) requirements. Project Delivery Costs include the costs of project delivery by the
sponsoring organization but do not include administrative overhead.
4. Total Project Cost Allocations
Proposed Project Total Cost: $ 83,658.54
Federal Cost Share: $ 62 743.91
State Cost Share: $10,457.32
$10,457.32
Local Cost Share
5. Basis of Cost Estimate: Briefly describe how the cost estimates listed in,43 above were developed(e.g. lump sum, unit cost,
quotation,etc.).
The Cost Estimates were developed above from actual work that was properly procured
and conducted. They come directly off of what was included on the FEMA approved PW
and the costs are broken down by type of work and site.
6. Project Management: Describe how you will manage the costs and schedule,and how you will ensure successful
performance.
The work for this Proposed Project has been completed or is pending completion. The
12.5% CDBG Local Match will be applied towards the Weld County Match for FEMA PW's
and the costs that were previously incurred during the disaster.
Note: The applicant must agree to furnish quarterly reports during the entire time the project is in active status. Quarters end
on March 31st,June 30th, September 30th, and December 31st. Reports are due to the State within 15 days after the end of
each quarter.)
Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 13 of 20
CDRG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
7. Project Maintenance Requirements:The following questions are to give assurance on the project's maintenance over
its useful life. Please answer each question and give a brief explanation.
a. If the project involves the acquisition of real property,what is the proposed land use after acquisition?(i.e.,Agriculture,
Recreation, Vacant Land, Park, Wetlands,etc.)
N/A
b. Will the project require periodic maintenance?
No
c. If yes,who will provide the maintenance?
N/A
d. What is the estimated cost of maintenance on an annual basis?
0
Note: Cost of maintenance is considered an application prioritization weighting factor. Projects with high maintenance
costs have a greater risk of future failure due to deferred maintenance. Therefore,the responses provided above should be
as complete and verifiable as possible in order to minimize the likelihood of ranking point reductions due to maintenance
concerns.
8. Additional Comments: Enter any additional comments related to the proposed projects funding, if desired.
CDBG funds are needed for the 12.5% Local FEMA Match and the associated PW that is
included in the NOI-Application.
9. Financial / Fiscal Health Factors: Please indicate the total budget (all funds) of your organization. Please describe the
impact of disaster recovery efforts to date on this budget. In addition, if this objective is selected based on the local
governments inability to finance the activity,the municipality must also include in the application package a resolution stating
this fact and supporting documentation such as budgetary information, a description of TABOR restrictions, and the most
recent audit report or approved exemption from audit.
Weld County's total 2015 budget is $307,031,089. The impact of the September, 2013
flooding has primary been on the damage to the county's road and bridge system. The
damage has resulted in Weld County having to transfer $5 million from the Contingency
Fund to the Public Works Fund in 2013 and in 2014 for a total of$10 million dollars. Without
assistance from FEMA, FWHA, and CDBG the amount would have several million more.
The impact has also forced the county to shift local resources from projects unrelated to
flooding to deal with the emergency situations created by the flood in both the 2013 and
2014 fiscal years. Even in 2015 the county is still using local resources to recover from the
flooding. Fortunately, Weld County has always been fiscally conservative and budgeted
responsibly. Had the county not taken the responsible approach to its finances county
service would have had to have been cut to cope with the flood recovery.
1Alolrl (`ni inh, nnarot e ,inrinr fhn mncf rnrfrirtivn etc/Anne-he fnv limitnfinn in thn ofntn Pro-lc-Inca
Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 14 of 20
CDR(;-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of I lomeland Security and Emergency Management
PART B -APPLICATION: PROJECT MILESTONES / TIMELINES / TASKS
Timeline/Tasks
Insert the proposed work schedule as tasks to accomplish the overall goal of the proposed activity(i.e., appraisals, title
search, closing, etc.), and provide a description of the task's purpose. This timeline will be used as a measurement tool
for progress in the project's implementation and is included in the required Quarterly Reports. Also, FEMA uses the
timeline for determining the approved period of performance. It will be the basis used to justify delays or extensions, if
necessary, and should be estimated carefully. The first and last entries are state requirements and have already been
entered.
Task I:
Grant Process and Environmental Review Timeframe: 3 Months
Task 2: Emergency Repairs-The initial emergency repairs were made directly I Completed
9 Y P 9 Y PTimeframe:
Task 3: Permanent Repairs- Becuase the emergency repairs werequick re aii Completed
p 9 y p P Timeframe:
Task 4:
Timeframe:
Task 5:
Timeframe:
Task 6:
Timeframe:
Task 7:
Timeframe:
Task H:
Timeframe:
Task 9:
Timeframe:
Final Inspection Report and Project Closeout
Task 10:
The Final Inspection Report is a review of the activity's paper documentation,
showing the project was implemented as required. Once the review is completed, the 3 Months
report and findings will be provided to the grantee for review and concurrence. The Time frame:
State submits the concurrence to FEMA as part of a closeout package to formally
')'Mal Project Timeframe: 6 Months
Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page IS of 20
CD11G-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
2. Start Date& Pre-Award Costs: The start date for any project begins upon GRANT AGREEMENT approval by the
State Controller. If a different start date or timeframe is needed,provide an explanation below.Also indicate if any pre-
award activities or costs have been incurred or authorized.
The proposed project is for local FEMA match dollars and the work has already been
completed. The repairs for this site began as soon as the flood waters receded and the
county crews were able to access the site. The initial phase of repairs were emergency in
nature and began in September of 2013 and concluded during November of that same year.
Permanent repairs for this site commenced the following year at the beginning of
construction season and concluded in October of 2014. Additionally, cost have been
incurred through the preparation of this NOI Application.
Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 16 of 20
CDBC-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
Please note that Part B is required for the final Application submittal. Part B sections
may optionally be completed and submitted with the NOI. Please update any Part A
section information when submitting you full Application.
PART B — APPLICATION: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
1. Environmental Review Background Information& Environmental Review Worksheet:
In accordance with 24 CFR Part 58.22 (see below), all federally funded projects must accomplish an environmental review
prior to beginning any work on a project.These HUD regulations are in place for two purposes:
I. To ensure federal funds are used to place people of low and moderate income in environmentally safe
conditions:and
2. To ensure federal funds are NOT used to negatively impact environmental conditions that exist near a
project site.
Please note the following limitations on CDBG-DR grant activities pending environmental clearance per 24 CFR Part 58.22.
(a) Neither a recipient nor any participant in the development process, including public or private nonprofit or for-profit
entities,or any of their contractors, may commit HUD assistance under a program listed in Sec. 58.1(6) on an activity or
project until HUD or the state has approved the recipient's RROF and the related certification from the responsible
entity. In addition, until the RROF and the related certification have been approved, neither a recipient nor any
participant in the development process may commit non-HUD funds on or undertake an activity or project under a
program listed in Sec. 58.1(b) if the activity or project would have an adverse environmental impact or limit the choice
of reasonable alternatives.
(6) N/A for DOLA/CDPS projects.
(c) If a recipient is considering an application from a prospective sub-recipient or beneficiary and is aware that the
prospective sub-recipient or beneficiary is about to take an action within the jurisdiction of the recipient that is
prohibited by paragraph (a) of this section, then the recipient will take appropriate action to ensure that the objectives
and procedures of NEPA are achieved.
(d)An option agreement on a proposed site or property is allowable prior to the completion of the environmental review
if the option agreement is subject to a determination by the recipient on the desirability of the property for the project as
a result of the completion of the environmental review in accordance with this part and the cost of the option is a
nominal portion of the purchase price. There is no constraint on the purchase of an option by third parties that have not
been selected for HUD funding, have no responsibility for the environmental review and have no say in the approval or
disapproval of the project.
(e) Self-Help Homeownership Opportunity Program (SHOP). In accordance with section I I(d)(2)(A) of the Housing
Opportunity Program Extension Act of [996(42 U.S.C. 12805 note), an organization, consortium, or affiliate receiving
assistance under the SHOP program may advance non-grant funds to acquire land prior to completion of an
environmental review and approval of a Request for Release of Funds (RROF) and certification, notwithstanding
paragraph (a) of this section. Any advances to acquire land prior to approval of the RROF and certification are made at
the risk of the organization, consortium, or affiliate and reimbursement for such advances may depend on the result of
the environmental review. This authorization is limited to the SHOP program only and all other forms of HUD
assistance are subject to the limitations in paragraph(a)of this section.
(1) Relocation. Funds may be committed for relocation assistance before the approval of the RROF and related
certification for the project provided that the relocation assistance is required by 24 CFR part 42.
Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 17 of 20
CDBC-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
Environmental Review Worksheet
Check ALL of the activities listed below that will be included as part of the project,
REGARDLESS OF THE FUNDING SOURCE:
U Information and financial services
• Administrative and management activities
O Environmental and other studies, resource identification, and the development of plans and strategies
El Most engineering and design costs associated with eligible projects
■ Inspections and testing of properties for hazards or defects
7, • Project planning
Q v ❑ Purchase of insurance
> m
❑ Purchase of tools
▪ s ❑ Technical assistance and training
X ▪ .E ❑ Interim assistance to arrest the effects of an imminent threat or physical deterioration in which the assistance
y $ does not alter environmental conditions.
✓❑ Public services that will not have a physical impact or result in any physical changes(e.g.,employment,child
care, health,education,counseling,welfare)
❑ Assistance for temporary or permanent improvements that do not alter environmental conditions and arc limited
to protection, repair,or restoration activities necessary only to control or arrest the effects from disasters or
imminent threats to public safety including those resulting from physical deterioration
(Must also complete the Regulatory Checklist at the end of Exhibit IV-A)
? ✓❑ Operating costs(c.g., maintenance, security, operation, utilities, furnishings, equipment,supplies, staff training
and recruitment,other incidental costs)
U r ❑ Relocation costs
• Acquisition,repair, improvement,reconstruction, or rehabilitation when the facilities and improvements are in
O place and will be retained in the same use without change in size or capacity of more than 20 percent
• ≥ ❑ Special projects directed to the removal of material and architectural barriers that restrict the mobility of and
GT] :a accessibility to elderly and handicapped persons
c-) s ❑ Acquisition(including leasing)or disposition of, or equity loans on,an existing structure
❑ Acquisition(including leasing)of vacant land provided the structure or land acquired, financed,or disposed of
will be retained for the same use
❑ Acquisition, repair, improvement,reconstruction,or rehabilitation when the facilities and improvements are in
O place,but will change in size or capacity of more than 20 percent
:> ❑ Acquisition,repair, improvement,reconstruction, or rehabilitation when the facilities and improvements are in
d "" place,but will involve a change in land use,such as from non-residential to residential,commercial to
'4 p industrial,or from one industrial use to another
r Demolition
❑ New construction
This checklist must he included with the CDBG application.
Please direct questions to the appropriate contact person below:
DOIA/DIX; DHSEM
Steven Boand,State Disaster Recovery Manager
Tarnra Norton,19wironmental Compliance Officer Department of Public Safety
Department at Local Affairs Division of Homeland Security and emergency Management
1313 Sherman Street,Room 52 I, 9195 I Mineral Ave,Suite 200
Denver,CO 80203 -
301-86G-6198 Centennial,CO 801 12
720.852.6713
tamra.norton(astate.co.us
steven.boand(dstate,co.us
DNS/DOLA USE ONLY:
Required level of environmental review: O Exempt O CENST O CESTO EA
Reviewed by:
Date of Review:
Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page IS of 20
CDBC-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
2. Supplemental Environmental Review Information
Enter any additional comments related to environmental concerns for the proposed project if desired. Please list and attach any
documents or studies that have been prepared that support the Environmental Review Worksheet responses.
All environmental issues are addressed on the attached Project Worksheet as supporting
documentation. The significant EHP issues were in regards to the Endangered Species Act
(ESA) and EHP Standard Conditions. All items were addressed and supporting backup
documentation can be provided upon request. Please see below for environmental permits that
were obtained.
Floodplain Permit
404 Nationwide Permit
Migratory Birds Permit (if needed)
Threatened and Endangered Species Permit
III
Attach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 19 of 20
CDBG-DR Infrastructure Application Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
PART B - APPLICATION: DETAILED PROJECT BUDGET
1. Detailed Project Budget: Please enter or attach a detailed and comprehensive final proposed budget for the project.
Please note that CDBG-DR funds may be limited to the amount submitted with the Not pending the availability of
additional funding
This Proposed Project is for the Local FEMA Match for costs for WELCO15 (574). These
costs were incurred as a result of FEMA-DR 4145. During the incident period of September
11, 2013 to September 30, 2013, Weld County, Colorado received heavy rainfall and debris in
the creeks, streams and rivers which caused severe flooding to and along roadways and
surface streets, and also severely damaged local infrastructure. This Application request
addresses the emergency work / damages that were a direct result of the severe flooding.
A Scope of Work and detailed project budget is included within the PW and addresses the
work that was completed.
Allach any continuations or additional items as an Attachment to the electronic application and e-mail submittal. Page 20 of 20
N 3
- v 3
A di
@_ o
E v E
E
c 0 E
o E i l a° .7, ?-1t1
3 3 3 c
_ _ _ „
E
ceh
11 O 0 O
i 2 -
29. , o 0
�,�, ^ mmmmmmr � mm � mmmmma ^ m mmr � r r ryrra � m � �
F
O
i ^ m m m m m ti .. N r m m m r m N N , m .. r .. r O ^ N N .. N
O
0
3
3
O
L' M9 0 0 ^ a o e o ^ o o a m o o ^ e 8 9 o ti o o r 9 o o o a o ^ ^ o
3
O
IINEWIREMIRMOMEMEMMEMD
. m e o o e e r ' ^ m .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. r N r ry 1 ry n n n m m , m m m
m o .. .. � r ^ � � � m m m .. .. .. .. m m m m e ., m e � � ^
`' a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a s a a a a a
c w w w w w w w f F f F w w w w w w f F f f F 14 E w w w w F F f F F w F
�LL
•
1.1110M1P1
`:. f
• '7 I
3 I ♦ tir: !
eiwie
t i►f
er
►.1 +
LL e r r
be
41bir 41
tt
Ar
: r l
'I NI �I • %tilt'',
i
.1.21S dili Zan
.a ' ' r i
Sit-
r
yob
IN
A T•...7 '1, .. •
1 b c 0 lit Pit •
lir
r •
��JT01
164
IV
} u r
i . • [ 1
I • r rail �I NI �I �I r
r
I _
I S e _
;p e a < a < a s /7
K
2 � 40; 2 w i a S w w w w w
_ IL LL LL LL LL LL f
LL I
W 11110.
,r' I
LL
A t
I to
i i ill] c
Is
—J 5 til
�.
l i
LL
U V r
d
• '
St r
' '
as
13 i Ili t
C ' 0
LEn
CD ® O i
r. 0 .5
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page I of 16
—t'
P. -08�Ci a 145-
a U oo574(0) P
► .
Applicant Name: Application Title:
WELD(COUNTY) WELCO15-CR 58
Period of Performance Start: Period of Performance End:
09-14-2013
Subgrant Application - Entire Application
Application Title: WELCO15-CR 58
Application Number: PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00574(0)
Application Type: Subgrant Application(PW)
Preparer Information
Prefix
First Name KATHLEEN
Middle Initial
Last Name RUVARAC
Title PROJECT SPECIALIST
Agency/Organization Name FEMA
Address 1 9200 EAST MINERAL AVE.
Address 2
City CENTENNIAL
State CO
Zip 80112
Email Deanna.Butterbaugh@state.co.us
Is the application preparer the Point of Contact? No
Point of Contact Information
Prefix
First Name Roy
Middle Initial
Last Name Rudisill
Title Director-OEM
Agency/Organization Director- OEM
Address 1 PO BOX 758
Address 2
City Greeley
State CO
ZIP 80632
Phone 970-304-6540
https://connectI.dhs.gov/emmie/.Danalnfo=isource.fema.net.SSL+dispatch Destination.do?... 5/7/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency F-Grants Page 2 of 16
Fax
Email rrudisill@weldgov.com
Alternate Point of Contact Information
Prefix
First Name
Middle Initial
Last Name
Title
Agency/Organization
Address 1
Address 2
City
State
ZIP
Phone
Fax
Email
Project Description
Disaster Number: 4145
Pre-Application Number: PA-08-CO-4145-RPA-0088
Applicant ID: 123-99123-00
Applicant Name: WELD (COUNTY)
Subdivision:
Project Number: WELCO15
Standard Project Number/Title: 399 - Road System Damage
Please Indicate the Project Type: Neither Alternate nor Improved
Application Title: WELCO15- CR 58
Category: C.ROADS & BRIDGES
Percentage Work Completed? 95.0 %
As of Date: 11-19-2013
Comments
Attachments
Damage Facilities (Part 1 of 2)
Facility Site
Number Facility Name Address County City State ZIP Previously Action
Damaged?
1 CR 58 near South Platte River Weld CO No
2 BRIDGE 58-47A OVER PATTERSON DITCH Weld CO No
https://connectI.dhs.eov/emmie/-Danalnfo=isource.fema.net-SSL+dispatch Destination.do?... 5/7/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 3 of 16
Comments
Attachments
User Date Document Description Hard Copy File File Name Action
Type Reference
SHIRLEY
SANDERS 02-07- Ma LOCATION WELCO15 Location
BROWN 2014 p mAP Map_CR58.pdf(133.93 kb) View
SHIRLEY 02-07-
SANDERS 2014 Photos PHOTOS Applicant Photos.pdf(7.46 Mb) View
BROWN
SHIRLEY 02-07- CR 58 near South Platte River
SANDERS 2014 Photos PHOTOS Photo Sheet 01.pdf(135.23 kb) View
BROWN
SHIRLEY 02-07- CR 58 near South Platte River
SANDERS 2014 Photos PHOTOS Photo Sheet 02.pdf(62.54 kb) View
BROWN
Facility Name: CR 58 near South Platte River
Address 1:
Address 2:
County: Weld
City:
State: CO
ZIP:
Was this site previously damaged? No
Percentage Work Completed? 95.00
PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00574(0):
GPS 40.40833-104.61388
Location:
PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00574(0):
Damage Description and Dimensions
During the incident period of September 11, 2013 to September 30, 2013,
Weld County, Colorado received heavy rainfall and debris in the creeks,
streams and rivers which caused damage to numerous roads and bridges
in Weld County. This project worksheet addresses damages to CR 58 east
of South Platte River and Bridge 58-47A over Patterson Ditch, in Section
12, T5N, R65W.
Damage Description and Dimensions: On November 19, 2013. Kathleen Ruvarac, FEMA TAC Bridge Specialist,
David Ray, FEMA Hazard Mitigation Specialist, Gary Moore, FEMA
Environmental, Historical, Preservation Specialist, and Donald Dunker,
Weld County Public Works Engineer, performed a site investigation at this
location to document damages. The road and bridge was open and repairs
completed at the time of inspection.
Location 1
CR 58 east of South Platte River, Category C, Permanent Road Repair
Let: N40.40833
https://connect I.dhs.gov/emm ie/.Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 5/7/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency F-Grants Page 4 of 16
Long: -W104.61388
Flooding of South Platte River resulted in damages on CR 58 include
washout of asphalt, roadway base and embankment material on the
westbound travel lane and adjacent shoulder.
Embankment Material lost in roadway void in the westbound travel lane
measuring 254 ft in length x 12 ft in width x 3 ft in depth =338.7 CY and on
north shoulder measuring 254 ft in length x 17 ft in width x 3 ft in depth
=479.8 CY, totaling 818.5 CY.
One asphalt patch on roadway measured 254 ft in length x 12 ft in width =
3,048 SF x 0.5 ft in depth = 1,524 CF x 146 LB/CF x 1 ton/2000 LB = 111.3
TNS asphalt.
Ditch cleaning each side of the road at the site is estimated to be 375 ft in
length on the north shoulder and 325 ft in length on the south shoulder
adjacent to the travel lanes, totaling 700 LF.
PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00574(0):
WORK TO BE COMPLETED
Location 1
1 —Fill void in roadway travel lane, embankment and north shoulder—
818.5 CY x 1.82 (Conversion Factor CY ABC Class 6 Material to Tons=
1,489.7 tons x$33.70/ton (CDOT Item Number 304-06000 Aggregate Base
Course Class 6 x 2 due to economies of scale as compared with number of
CDOT annual projects) = $50,201.88
Scope of Work: 2—Install asphalt on roadway westbound travel lane = 111.3 tons x
$81.70/ton (CDOT Item Number 403-33741 Hot Bituminous Pavement
(Grading S) (75) (PG 64-22) = $9,093.21
3—Ditch cleaning each side of roadway= 700 LF x $3.40/LF All material
was re-used on the road shoulder.(FEMA Cost Code 3070 Ditch Cleaning
and shaping) = $2,380.00
Total Location 1 = $61,675.09
Hazard Mitigation Proposal
• Is effective mitigation feasible on this site? IYes
If you answered Yes to the above question, the next question is required
WII mitigation be performed on this site? 'Yes
If you answered Yes to the above question, the next question is required
Do you wish to attach a Hazard Mitigation Yes
Proposal?
If you answered Yes to the above question, the next two questions are required
Work To Be Completed
The applicant has indicated that the installation of turf
reinforcement mat on the roadside shoulders and embankment
slopes will re-direct channel flow across the slopes reducing
erosion at the facility and alleviating future damages.
Please provide the Scope of Work for the estimate: 1) Turf Reinforcement Mat—254 ft in length x 19 ft in width
maximum 4000 a��te�si within the right of way= 536.2 SY x 1.2 factor for toe in excess
of material = 643.5 SY x $10.00/SY (CDOT Item Number 216-
00301) = $6,435.00
This HMP is considered cost effective per FEMA Disaster
Assistance Policy 9526.1, Section VII. B. 2. Certain mitigation
measures (Appendix A), determined cost effective, as long as
the mitigation measure does not exceed 100% of the eligible
https://connect).dhs.gov/emmie/,Danatnfo=isource.fema.net.SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 5/7/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 5 of 16
cost of the eligible repair work on the project.
Appendix A. 5. Gabion baskets, rip rap, sheet piling, and
geotextile fabric installation- installation to control erosion.
Location 1 —SOW Item#1 = $50,201.88
$6,435.00/$50,201.88 = 12.8%
The net cost of mitigation/cost of damages is 12.8% < 100%.
This HMP is for cost estimating purposes only. The Final
design is the obligation of the Applicant and/or their agent.
Would you like to add the Hazard Mitigation Yes
Proposal as a cost line item to the project cost?
GIS Coordinates
Project Location Latitude Longitude
CR 58 40.40833 -104.61388
Facility Name: BRIDGE 58-47A OVER PATTERSON DITCH
Address 1:
Address 2:
County: Weld
City:
State: CO
ZIP:
Was this site previously damaged? No
Percentage Work Completed? 95.00 %
PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00574(0):
BRIDGE 58-47A OVER PATTERSON DITCH
Location:
PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00574(0):
Location 2
Bridge 58-47A over Patterson Ditch, Category C, Permanent Bridge Repair
Lat: N40.41003
Long: -W104.62029
Flooding of Patterson Ditch resulted in damages to Bridge 58-47A including
washout of asphalt, roadway base and embankment material on the east
and west approaches behind the backwalls and wingwalls.
The double span concrete bridge, 75 ft in length x 32 ft in width, traverses
the Patterson Ditch and consists of a concrete deck, one(1) concrete
Damage Description and Dimensions: intermediate pier and integral concrete backwall and wingwalls. Bridge
inspection reports were not provided by the applicant.
Material lost in first roadway patch on the east approach behind the
backwall is estimated to be 40 ft in length x 31 ft in width x 10 ft in depth
=459.3 CY.
Material lost in second roadway patch is estimated to be 18 ft in length x 7
ft in width x 3 ft in depth = 14.0 CY.
Material lost in third roadway patch is estimated to be 4 ft in length x 3 ft in
width x 3 ft in depth = 1.3 CY.
Total Material: 474.6 CY
One asphalt patch on roadway behind the east backwall measured 40 ft in
length x 31 ft in width = 1.240 SF x 0.5 ft in depth = 620 CF x 146 LB/CF x
1 ton/2000 LB = 45.3 TNS asphalt
https://connectl.dhs.gov/emm ie,DanaInfo=isource.fema.net.SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 5/7/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency F-Grants Page 6 of 16
A second asphalt patch on roadway measured 18 ft in length x 7 ft in width
= 126 SF x 0.5 ft in depth = 63 CF x 146 LB/CF x 1 ton/2000 LB = 4.6 TNS
asphalt
A third asphalt patch on roadway measured 4 ft in length x 3 ft in width =
12 SF x 0.5 ft in depth = 6 CF x 146 LB/CF x1 ton/2000 LB = 0.4 TNS
asphalt
Total Asphalt: 50.3 TNS
In addition, Rip Rap was washed away at each wingwall and is estimated to
be (15 ft in front of each wingwall x 4 wingwalls, totaling 60 ft in length x 5 ft
in width towards the channel x 3 ft in depth = 33.3 CY.
The Applicant has provided pictures of the road and bridge facilities dated
9-15-2013 documenting damages. These photos are attached to this
project worksheet.
PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00574(0):
Work To Be Completed
Location 2
1 —Structural Backfill behind east abutment backwall at first roadway patch
location—459.3 CY x$14.68/CY (CDOT Item Number 206-00100 Structural
Backfill) = $6,742.52
2- Fill voids in roadway travel lane in the second and third asphalt patch
locations— 15.3 CY x 1.82 = 27.8 tons x$33.70/ton (CDOT Item Number
304-06000 Aggregate Base Course Class 6 x 2 due to economies of scale
as compared with number of CDOT annual projects) = $936.86
3- Install asphalt at three locations on the westbound travel lane= 50.3
tons x$81.70/ton (CDOT Item Number 403-33741 Hot Bituminous
Pavement (Grading S) (75) (PG 64-22) = $4,109.51
4—Replace Rip-Rap in front of wingwalls—33.3 CY x$83.17/CY (CDOT
Item Number 506-00218 Rip Rap 18 inch) = $2,769.56
Total Location 2 = $14,558.45
Total: $76,223.54 cost estimate prepared by project specialist using 2013
CDOT Average Unit Prices
Project Notes
1. Following the September 2013 flooding, applicant used contract
services and/or force account resources to re-open roads/bridges and
repair damage as soon as possible. At several damage sites, repairs
Scope of Work: appear to have returned the facility to its pre-disaster design, function and
capacity with no known remaining work to be completed. However at other
sites due to the onset of winter conditions, applicant was unable to
complete the restoration, thus leaving work to be completed. Finally, at
some sites, applicant has expressed concern that unanticipated work may
be still be required as a result of conditions beyond their control, such as
possible subsequent settlement resulting from saturated soil conditions
following the flood or where high water levels or erosion/deposition
prevented a complete damage assessment.
2. This PW addresses all validated flood related damages at the specified
site, including completed work and work to be completed (which damages
were known to the applicant and reported to FEMA by the effective date of
this P\A/). In the event that applicant identifies subsequent, currently
unknown flood related damage at such site, applicant is advised to contact
the State of Colorado Office of Emergency Management to report the
damage and request an inspection prior to its repair. In the event that the
State validates the damage as a direct result of the September 2013
flooding, the State will request FEMA prepare a version of this PW to
address the eligible cost of repair. The Applicant will notify FEMA and the
State of their intent to perform permanent work related to this site before
any work commences in the field. Failure to do so may jeopardize the sub-
grant for permanent work related to the work in this sub-grant.
https://connect I.dhs.gov/emmie/.Danalnfo=isource.fcma.net.SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 5/7/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 7 of 16
3. Applicant has completed a substantial percentage of the work but will
not have cost data available within the fourteen day Pocket Guide rule. Per
Field Operations Pocket Guide, Section 7, Cost Estimates, Page 26, "If the
applicant has not produced cost data within two weeks of the site
inspection, the Project Specialist will prepare the PW on the basis of an
estimate for the work accomplished". Applicant and FEMA personnel jointly
conducted all inspections and agreed to use CDOT costs for in-place costs
to derive estimates on this project worksheet. Applicant understands that all
actual support documentation, invoices, FA records, contract and proof of
payment will be required for final reconciliation and or closeout process.
Attached is the CDOT average in-place cost for materials.
4. The Applicant will notify FEMA and the State of their intent to perform
permanent work related to this site before any work commences in the field.
Failure to do so may jeopardize the sub-grant for permanent work related to
the work in this sub-grant.
5. Pursuant to 44 CFR 13.42, Grantees and Subgrantees are required to
retain records, including source documentation, to support
expenditures/costs incurred against the grant award, for 3 years from the
date of submission to FEMA of the final Financial Status Report.
6. The applicant must obtain all required federal, state, and local permits
prior to the commencement of work.
7. The subgrantee is requesting direct administrative costs that are
directly chargeable to this specific project. Associated eligible work is
related to administration of the PA project only and in accordance with 44
CFR 13.22. These costs are treated consistently and uniformly as direct
costs in all federal awards and other subgrantee activities and are not
included in any approved indirect costs.
8. Project was reviewed for 406 Hazard Mitigation and a 406 HMP
proposal is attached to this project worksheet.
9. The applicant is aware that all projects are subject to an insurance
review as stated in 44 C.F.R. Sections 206.252 and 206.253. If applicable,
an insurance determination will be made either as anticipated proceeds or
actual proceeds in accordance with the applicant's insurance policy that
may affect the total amount of the project.
10. The applicant is required to adhere to State and Federal Government
Procurement rules and regulations and maintain adequate records to
support the basis for all purchasing of goods and materials and contracting
services for projects approved under the Public Assistance program, as
stated in 44 CFR 13.36. The applicant has advised they have followed their
normal procurement procedures.
Hazard Mitigation Proposal
• Is effective mitigation feasible on this site? IYes
If you answered Yes to the above question, the next question is required
Will mitigation be performed on this site? Yes
If you answered Yes to the above question, the next question is required
https://connectI.dhs.gov/emmie/.Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 5/7/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency F-Grants Page 8 of 16
Do you wish to attach a Hazard Mitigation Yes
Proposal?
If you answered Yes to the above question,the next two questions are required
Please provide the Scope of Work for the estimate: HMP ATTACHED
(maximum 4000 characters)
Would you like to add the Hazard Mitigation No
Proposal as a cost line item to the project cost?
GIS Coordinates
Project Location Latitude Longitude
BRIDGE 58-47A 40.41003 -104.62029
Special Considerations
1. Does the damaged facility or item of work have insurance coverage and/or is it an insurable No
risk (e.g., buildings, equipment, vehicles, etc)?
2. Is the damaged facility located within a floodplain or coastal high hazard area and/or does it Yes
have an impact on a floodplain or wetland?
If you would like to make any comments, please enter them below.
(maximum 4000 characters)
Location 1 -Zone B-Areas between limits of the 100 year flood and and 500 year flood; etc. Location 2-Zone C-
Areas of minimal flooding. Flood Map Panel 0802660637C dated September 28, 1982
3. Is the damaged facility or item of work located within or adjacent to a Coastal Barrier Resource No
System Unit or an Otherwise Protected Area?
4.Will the proposed facility repairs/reconstruction change the pre-disaster conditions(e.g., No
footprint, material, location, capacity. use of function)?
5. Does the applicant have a hazard mitigation proposal or would the applicant like technical Yes
assistance for a hazard mitigation proposal?
6. Is the damaged facility on the National Register of Historic Places or the state historic listing? Is No
it older than 50 years?Are there more, similar buildings near the site?
7.Are there any pristine or undisturbed areas on, or near,the project site?Are there large tracts No
of forestland?
8. Are there any hazardous materials at or adjacent to the damaged facility and/or item of work? No
9.Are there any other environmental or controversial issues associated with the damaged facility Yes
and/or item of work?
If you would like to make any comments, please enter them below.
(maximum 4000 characters)
EHP to conduct review
Attachments
User Date Document Description Hard Copy File File Name Action
Type Reference
SHIRLEY SANDERS 02-07- Floodplain FIRMETTET Firmette.pdf(501.78 View
BROWN 2014kb)
For Category C, D, E, F, and G Projects only
Is effective mitigation feasible on this project? Yes
If you answered Yes to the above question,the next question is required
Will mitigation be performed on any sites in this Yes
project?
If you answered Yes to the above question, the next question is required
https://connect I.dhs.gov/emmie/.Danalnto=isource.tema.net.SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 5/7/?0 14
Federal Emergency Management Agency F-Grants Page 9 of 16
Do you wish to attach a Hazard Mitigation Yes
Proposal?
If you answered Yes to the above question, the next two questions are required
Work To Be Completed The applicant has indicated that the
installation of turf reinforcement mat on the roadside shoulders
and embankment slopes will re-direct channel flow across the
slopes reducing erosion at the facility and alleviating future
damages. 1)Turf Reinforcement Mat—254 ft in length x 19 ft
in width within the right of way= 536.2 SY x 1.2 factor for toe
in excess of material=643.5 SY x$10.00/SY(CDOT Item
Number 216-00301) =$6,435.00 This HMP is considered cost
Please provide the Scope of Work effective per FEMA Disaster Assistance Policy 9526.1, Section
for the estimate' VII. B. 2. Certain mitigation measures (Appendix A),
determined cost effective, as long as the mitigation measure
does not exceed 100% of the eligible cost of the eligible repair
work on the project.Appendix A. 5. Gabion baskets, rip rap,
sheet piling, and geotextile fabric installation-installation to
control erosion. Location 1 —SOW Item#1 =$50,201.88
$6,435.00/$50,201.88 = 12.8% The net cost of mitigation/cost
of damages is 12.8%< 100%. This HMP is for cost estimating
purposes only. The Final design is the obligation of the
Applicant and/or their agent.
Would you like to add the Hazard Mitigation Yes
Proposal as a cost line item to the project cost?
Hazard Mitigation Proposal-0909
# Code Material and/or Description Unit Unit of Unit Price Subgrant Type Cost Estimate Action
p Quantity Measure Budget Class
***Version 0***
119999 'Turf reinforcement mat I 643.5 1 SY I $ 10.00I $ 6,435.00
Total Cost: $ 6,436.00
Comments
Attachments
User Date Document Description Hard Copy File File Name Action
Type Reference
SHIRLEY 02-07- Mitigation WELCO15 EHP Email Approval of
SANDERS 2014 Document MITIGATION HMP.pdf(78.81 kb) View
BROWN
SHIRLEY 02-07- Mitigation Weld County CAT C CR 58 near
SANDERS 2014 Document MITIGATION South Platte River_HMP.docx View
BROWN (19.30 kb)
Cost Estimate
Is this Project Worksheet for
(Preferred) Repair
Material Unit Unit of Subgrant Cost
Sequence Code and/or Quantity Measure Unit Price Budget Class Type Action
Estimate
Description
***Version 0***
https://connectl.dhs.gov/emmie .Danalnii)=isource.tema.net,SSL.+dispatch Destination.do'?... 5/7/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page I0 of 16
Work To Be Completed
Work To
1 9999 REPAIR 1 LS 76 223 54 CONSTRUCTION Be $ 76,223.54
Completed
Direct Work To
2 9901 Administrative 1 LS $ INDIRECT Be $ 1,000.00
Costs 1.000.00 CHARGES Completed
(Subgrantee)
Total Cost : $77,223.54
Insurance Adjustments(Deductibles, Proceeds and Settlements) -5900/5901
Unit Unit of Unit Subgrant Cost
Sequence Code Material and/or Description Quantity Measure Price Budget Type Estimate Action
Class
Total Cost: $0.00
Hazard Mitigation Proposal-0909
Subgrant
Sequence Code Material and/or Description Unit Unit of Unit Budget Type Cost Action
q p Quantity Measure Price Class yp Estimate
***Version 0***
1 19999 Turf reinforcement mat 1643.5 1 SY I $ 10.001 I I$6,435.00
Total Cost : $6,435.00
Total Cost Estimate: $83,658.54
(Preferred Estimate Type+Insurance Ac(ustments+Hazard Mitigation Proposal)
Comments
Attachments
User Date Document Description Hard Copy File File Name Action
Type Reference
SHIRLEY Weld County-2013 CDOT
SANDERS 02-07- Calculation CDOT COST OF Average Unit Prices.pdf View
BROWN 2014 Sheet MATERIAL (37.37 kb)
Existing Insurance Information
insurance Type Policy No. Bldg/Property Content Insurance Deductible Years
Amount Amount Amount Amount Required
Comments
On file at JFO
Attachments
Comments and Attachments
Name of Section Comment Attachment
Preparer Information WeldCoBridgeFM0802660637O111.Pdf
https://connect .dhs.gov/emmiej.Danalnfo=isourcefema.net.SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 5/7i?0I4
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 11 of 16
WELCO15 Location Map CR58.pdf
Damage Facilities Applicant Photos.pdf
CR 58 near South Platte River Photo Sheet 01.pdf
CR 58 near South Platte River Photo Sheet 02.pdf
Special Considerations Firmette.pdf
Mitigation WELCO15 EHP Email Approval of HMP.pdf
Weld County CAT C CR 58 near South Platte River HMP.docx
Cost Estimate Weld County-2013 CDOT Average Unit Prices.pdf
Insurance Information On file at JFO
Form 90-91 Weld County CAT C CR 58 near South Platte River.docx
Signed by Applicant WELCO15 WCR58 PW.pdf
Bundle Reference#(Amendment#) Date Awarded
PA-08-CO-4145-State-0035(34) 03-03-2014
Subgrant Application - FEMA Form 90-91
Note: The Effective Cost Share for this application is 75%
FFDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
PROJECT WORKSHEET
DISASTER PROJECT NO. PA ID NO. DATE CATEGORY
WELCO15 123-99123- 02-19-2014 C
FEMA 4145 I- 1 DR -CO Do
APPLICANT WELD(COUNTY) WORK COMPLETE AS OF:
11-19-2013:95%
Site 1 of 2
DAMAGED FACILITY:
COUNTY: Weld
CR 58 near South Platte River
LOCATION: LATITUDE: LONGITUDE
40.40833 -104.61388
0A-08-C O-4145-P W-00 574(0)•
GPS 40.40833-104.61388
DAMAGE DESCRIPTION AND DIMENSIONS:
PA-08-CO-4145-PVV-00574(0):
Damage Description and Dimensions
During the incident period of September 11,2013 to September 30. 2013.Weld County.Colorado received heavy rainfall and debris in the
creeks,streams and rivers which caused damage to numerous roads and bridges in Weld County. This project worksheet addresses damages
to CR 58 east of South Platte River and Bndge 58-47A over Patterson Ditch,in Section 12.T5N.R65W.
On November 19.2013,Kathleen Ruvarac,FEMA TAC Bridge Specialist.David Ray,FEMA Hazard Mitigation Specialist.Gary Moore.FEMA
Environmental,Historical.Preservation Specialist.and Donald Dunker,Weld County Public Works Engineer,performed a site investigation at
this location to document damages. The road and bridge was open and repairs completed at the time of inspection.
Location 1 •
CR 58 east of South Platte River.Category C.Permanent Road Repair
Lat:N40.40833
Long: -W104.61388
Flooding of South Platte River resulted in damages on CR 58 include washout of asphalt.roadway base and embankment material on the
westbound travel lane and adjacent shoulder.
Embankment Material lost in roadway void in the westbound travel lane measuring 254 ft in length x 12 ft in width x 3 ft in depth=338.7 CY and
on north shoulder measuring 254 ft in length x 17 ft in width x 3 ft in depth=479.8 CY.totaling 818.5 CY.
https://connect I.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnto=isottrce.fema.net.SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 5/7/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency F-Grants Page 12 of 16
One asphalt patch on roadway measured 254 ft in length x 12 ft in width=3.048 SF x 0.5 ft in depth= 1.524 CF x 146 LB/CF x 1 ton/2000 LB=
111.3 TNS asphalt.
Ditch cleaning each side of the road at the site is estimated to be 375 ft in length on the north shoulder and 325 ft in length on the south
shoulder adjacent to the travel lanes.totaling 700 LF.
SCOPE OF WORK.
PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00574101'.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED
Location 1
1—Fill void in roadway travel lane,embankment and north shoulder—818.5 CY x 1.82(Conversion Factor CY ABC Class 6 Material to Tons=
1,489.7 tons x$33.70/ton(CDOT Item Number 304-06000 Aggregate Base Course Class 6 x 2 due to economies of scale as compared with
number of CDOT annual projects)=$50,201.88
2—Install asphalt on roadway westbound travel lane= 111.3 tons x$81 70/ton(CDOT Item Number 403-33741 Hot Bituminous Pavement
(Grading S)(75)(PG 64-22)=$9.093.21
3—Ditch cleaning each side of roadway=700 LF x$3.40/LF All material was re-used on the road shoulder.(FEMA Cost Code 3070 Ditch
Cleaning and shaping)=$2.380.00
Total Location 1 =$61.675.09
Site 2 of 2
DAMAGED FACILITY.
COUNTY. Weld
BRIDGE 58-47A OVER PATTERSON DITCH
LOCATION. LATITUDE. LONGITUDE.
40.41003 -104.62029
PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00574(0)'.
BRIDGE 58-47A OVER PATTERSON DITCH
DAMAGE DESCRIPTION AND DIMENSIONS.
PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00574(0)'.
Location 2
Bridge 58-47A over Patterson Ditch. Category C. Permanent Bridge Repair
Lat. N40.41003
Long.-W104.62029
Flooding of Patterson Ditch resulted in damages to Bridge 58-47A including washout of asphalt. roadway base and embankment material on the
east and west approaches behind the backwalls and wingwalls.
The double span concrete bridge. 75 ft in length a 32 ft in width traverses the Patterson Ditch and consists of a concrete deck.one(1)concrete
intermediate pier and integral concrete backwall and wingwalls. Bridge inspection reports were not provided by the applicant.
Material lost in first roadway patch on the east approach behind the backwall is estimated to be 40 ft in length x 31 ft in width x 10 ft in depth
=459.3 CY
Material lost in second roadway patch is estimated to be 18 ft in length x 7 ft in width x 3 ft in depth= 14.0 CY.
Material lost in third roadway patch is estimated to be 4 ft in length a 3 ft in width x 3 ft in depth= 1.3 CY.
Total Material. 474.6 CY
One asphalt patch on roadway behind the east backwall measured 40 ft in length x 31 ft in width=1.240 SF x 0.5 ft in depth=620 CF x 146
LB/CF x 1 ton/2000 LB=45.3 TNS asphalt
A second asphalt patch on roadway measured 18 ft in length x 7 ft in width= 126 SF x 0.5 ft in depth=63 CF x 146 LB/CF x 1 ton/2000 LB=
4.6 TNS asphalt
A third asphalt patch on roadway measured 4 ft in length x 3 ft in width= 12 SF x 0.5 ft in depth=6 CF x 146 LB/CF x 1 ton/2000 LB=0.4 TNS
asphalt
Total Asphalt. 50.3 TNS
In addition. Rip Rap was washed away at each wingwall and is estimated to be(15 ft in front of each wingwall x 4 wingwalls,totaling 60 ft in
length x 5 ft in width towards the channel x 3 ft in depth=33.3 CY.
The Applicant has provided pictures of the road and bridge facilities dated 9-15-2013 documenting damages. These photos are attached to this
project worksheet.
SCOPE OF WORK.
PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00574(0).
Work To Be Completed
https://connect I.dhs.gov/emm ie/.Danalnfo=isource.lema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 5/7/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency F-Grants Page 13 of 16
Location 2
1—Structural Backfill behind east abutment backwall at first roadway patch location—459.3 CY x$14.68/CY(COOT Item Number 206-00100
Structural Backfill)=$6,742.52
2-Fill voids in roadway travel lane in the second and third asphalt patch locations—15.3 CY x 1.82=27.8 tons x$33.70/ton(COOT Item
Number 304-06000 Aggregate Base Course Class 6 x 2 due to economies of scale as compared with number of COOT annual projects)=
$936.86
3-Install asphalt at three locations on the westbound travel lane=50.3 tons x$81.70/ton(COOT Item Number 403-33741 Hot Bituminous
Pavement(Grading S)(75)(PG 64-22)=$4 109.51
4—Replace Rip-Rap in front of wingwalls—33.3 CY x$83.17/CY(COOT Item Number 506-00218 Rip Rap 18 inch)=$2.769.56
Total Location 2=$14,558.45
Total. $76,223 54 cost estimate prepared by project specialist using 2013 COOT Average Unit Prices
Project Notes
1. Following the September 2013 flooding. applicant used contract services and/or force account resources to re-open roads/bridges and
repair damage as soon as possible. At several damage sites,repairs appear to have returned the facility to its pre-disaster design function and
capacity with no known remaining work to be completed. However at other sites due to the onset of winter conditions.applicant was unable to
complete the restoration.thus leaving work to be completed. Finally at some sites applicant has expressed concern that unanticipated work
may be still be required as a result of conditions beyond their control,such as possible subsequent settlement resulting from saturated soil
conditions following the flood or where high water levels or erosion/deposition prevented a complete damage assessment.
2. This PW addresses all validated flood related damages at the specified site. including completed work and work to be completed(which
damages were known to the applicant and reported to FEMA by the effective date of this PW). In the event that applicant identifies subsequent,
currently unknown flood related damage at such site applicant is advised to contact the State of Colorado Office of Emergency Management to
report the damage and request an inspection prior to its repair. In the event that the State validates the damage as a direct result of the
September 2013 flooding,the State will request FEMA prepare a version of this PW to address the eligible cost of repair.The Applicant will
notify FEMA and the State of their intent to perform permanent work related to this site before any work commences in the field. Failure to do so
may jeopardize the sub-grant for permanent work related to the work in this sub-grant.
3. Applicant has completed a substantial percentage of the work but will not have cost data available within the fourteen day Pocket Guide
rule. Per Field Operations Pocket Guide. Section 7. Cost Estimates, Page 26. 'If the applicant has not produced cost data within two weeks of
the site inspection.the Project Specialist will prepare the PW an the basis of an estimate for the work accomplished'.Applicant and FEMA
personnel jointly conducted all inspections and agreed to use COOT costs for in-place costs to derive estimates on this project worksheet.
Applicant understands that all actual support documentation,invoices. FA records,contract and proof of payment will be required for final
reconciliation and or closeout process.Attached is the COOT average in-place cost for materials.
4. The Applicant will notify FEMA and the State of their intent to perform permanent work related to this site before any work commences in
the field. Failure to do so may jeopardize the sub-grant for permanent work related to the work in this sub-grant.
5. Pursuant to 44 CFR 13 42,Grantees and Subgrantees are required to retain records. including source documentation.to support
expenditures/costs incurred against the grant award. for 3 years from the date of submission to FEMA of the final Financial Status Report.
6. The applicant must obtain all required federal state,and local permits prior to the commencement of work.
7. The subgrantee is requesting direct administrative costs that are directly chargeable to this specific project. Associated eligible work is
related to administration of the PA project only and in accordance with 44 CFR 13.22. These costs are treated consistently and uniformly as
direct costs in all federal awards and other subgrantee activities and are not included in any approved indirect costs.
8. Project was reviewed for 406 Hazard Mitigation and a 406 HMP proposal is attached to this project worksheet.
9. The applicant is aware that all projects are subject to an insurance review as stated in 44 C.F.R. Sections 206.252 and 206.253.If
applicable an insurance determination will be made either as anticipated proceeds or actual proceeds in accordance with the applicants
insurance policy that may affect the total amount of the project.
10. The applicant is required to adhere to State and Federal Government Procurement rules and regulations and maintain adequate records to
support the basis for all purchasing of goods and materials and contracting services for projects approved under the Public Assistance program,
as stated in 44 CFR 13.36. The applicant has advised they have followed their normal procurement procedures.
Does the Scope of Work change the pre-disaster
conditions at the site? Yes No Special Considerations included? Yes No
Hazard Mitigation proposal included' Yes No Is there insurance coverage on this facility' Yes No
PROJECT COST
ITEM CODE NARRATIVE QUANTITY/UNIT UNIT PRICE COST
*—Version 0 ***
Work To Be Completed
1 9999 REPAIR 1/LS $ 76,223.54 $ 76,223.54
Direct Administrative Costs
https://connectI.dhs.gov/emmie/,Dana[nfo=isource.fema.net,SSt.+dispatch Destination.do?... 5/7/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 14 of 16
2 9901 (Subgrantee) 1/LS $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00
3 0909 Hazard Mitigation Proposal 1/LS $6,435.00 $6,435.00
TOTAL COST $ 83,658.54
PREPARED BY KATHLEEN RUVARAC TITLE PROJECT SPECIALIST SIGNATURE
APPLICANT REP Roy Rudisill TITLE Director-OEM SIGNATURE
WELD(COUNTY) : PA-08-CO-4145-PW-00574
Conditions Information
Review Name Condition Type Condition Name Description Monitored Status
This review does not address all
federal, state and local
requirements. Acceptance of
federal funding requires recipient
Final Review Other(EHP) Standard to comply with all federal, state No Approved
Condition#2 and local laws. Failure to obtain
all appropriate federal, state and
local environmental permits and
clearances may jeopardize
federal funding.
Any change to the approved
Standard scope of work will require re-
Final Review Other(EHP) Condition#1 evaluation for compliance with No Approved
NEPA and other Laws and
Executive Orders.
The applicant should implement
appropriate FWS conservation
measures identified in the
Emergency Consultation between
FEMA and USFWS, dated
September 24, 2013, to the extent
Endangered possible; including a post-
Final Review Other(EHP) Species Act construction estimate of the No Approved
(ESA) amount of habitat affected by the
emergency response, an
evaluation of how conservation
recommendations were
implemented, and the results of
implementation in minimizing
adverse effects.
If ground disturbing activities
occur during construction,
applicant will monitor ground
Final Review Other(EHP) Standard disturbance and if any potential No Approved
Condition#3 archeological resources are
discovered,will immediately
cease construction in that area
and notify the State and FEMA.
This review does not address all
federal, state and local
EHP Review Other(EHP) Standard requirements. Acceptance of No Recommended
Condition#2 federal funding requires recipient
to comply with all federal, state
and local laws. Failure to obtain
https://connect I .dhs.goviemmie%.Danalnfo=isource.tema.net.SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 5/7/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 15 of 16
all appropriate federal, state and
local environmental permits and
clearances may jeopardize
federal funding.
Any change to the approved
Standard scope of work will require re-
EHP Review Other(EHP) Condition#1 evaluation for compliance with No Recommended
NEPA and other Laws and
Executive Orders.
The applicant should implement
appropriate FWS conservation
measures identified in the
Emergency Consultation between
FEMA and USFWS, dated
September 24, 2013, to the extent
Endangered possible; including a post-
EHP Review Other(EHP) Species Act construction estimate of the No Recommended
(ESA) amount of habitat affected by the
emergency response, an
evaluation of how conservation
recommendations were
implemented, and the results of
implementation in minimizing
adverse effects.
If ground disturbing activities
occur during construction,
applicant will monitor ground
EHP Review Other(EHP) Standard disturbance and if any potential No Recommended
Condition#3 archeological resources are
discovered, will immediately
cease construction in that area
and notify the State and FEMA.
Internal Comments
No. Queue User Date/Time Reviewer Comments
Award 03-03-2014
6 Review SYSTEM 11:45 PM ACCEPTED
GMT
Note:at some sites, applicant has expressed concern that
unanticipated work may be still be required as a result of
conditions beyond their control,such as possible subsequent
settlement resulting from saturated soil conditions following the
flood or where high water levels or erosion/deposition
02-27-2014 prevented a complete damage assessment as the reason for
5 Final PALACIO 04:33 PM the 95% completion approximately$3000.00. Final Reviewer
Review JOSE GMT finds eligible the application and approves the funding of this
CAT-C project worksheet based on the applicant having
performed all required procurement procedures, perform all
required special considerations recommendations such as
permits to address EHP considerations and securing all actual
cost documentation for the financial reconciliation of this
project. Task Force Leader- J. Palacio 02/27/2014
Grantee MOSER 02-26-2014 Correct % complete in final. PW currently shows 95%
4 Review JORDAN GMT PM complete, though all work is "work to be completed"
Weld County, Cat C, 95%, Replacement of patch of asphalt
and restoration of embankment using the material that washed
out. Mitigation: add turf mat to the embankment. -tcookro-
https://connectl.dhs.gov/emmie/,Dana(nfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 5/7/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 16 of 16
02/21/2014 16:58:02 GMT
Project site work is not in a mapped wetland. -tcookro-
02/21/2014 16:59:46 GMT
Entire community will benefit from project completion. -
tcookro- 02/21/2014 16:59:20 GMT
Action is addressed under the attached Emergency
Consultation between FEMA and USFWS, dated September
24, 2013. The consultation includes conservation measures
intended to minimize impacts to the federally listed Preble's
EHP PATTERSON 02-21-2014 Meadow Jumping Mouse, Ute's Lady's Tress and Colorado
3 Review MOLLY 09:27 PM Butterfly Bush, and Designated Critical Habitat protected under
GMT the ESA. -tcookro- 02/21/2014 17:40:54 GMT
Per Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Project is located in
Zone B. FIRM 0802660637C, WELD CO, 09/28/1982. Project
has limited to no potential to impact the floodplain function or
resources and substantially restores site to pre-disaster
condition. -tcookro- 02/21/2014 17:12:47 GMT
The scope of work has been reviewed and meets the criteria of
the 2013 signed Programmatic Agreement, Appendix B: Ill-A,
B, D, E, F agreed to by FEMA and the SHPO.-tcookro-
02/21/2014 17:49:27 GMT
A review of the documentation provided has identified that
Weld County is insured for property damages through;
Colorado Counties Casualty and Property Pool, Policy Number
020412751.
This policy does not provide coverage for dams, dikes,
Insurance JOHNSON 02-20-2014 bridges, culverts, roadways, streets, walks, paved surfaces,
2 Review KENNETH 09:44 PM tunnels, canals, land.
GMT The insurance policy will not provide coverage for costs
identified in this PW
There will not be an insurance reduction for this PW.
The FEMA eligible damages are not to building, contents,
equipment, or vehicles; therefore, there will not be an
insurance commitment required.
Mitigation 02-20-2014 The Hazard Mitigation Proposal is approved- Brian W. Drost,
1 Review DROST BRIAN GMT PM 406 Specialist
https://connectI.dhs.gov/emmie/.Danajnfb=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatch Destination.do?... 5/7/2014
Hello