The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20152505.tiff INVENTORY OF ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION Applicant Weld LV LLC & Gerrard Investments LLC, c/o Martin Marietta Case Number USR15-0027 Submitted or Prepared Tyler PC Tyler 2015-2505 Exhibits 1 -305 Prior At pg # EX # to Hear Hear ing ing 12 1 Surrounding Property Owner — Patricia L. Boegli email dated January 20, 2015 X 15 2 Surrounding Property Owner — Paul Markus email dated January 22, 2015 X 16 3 Surrounding Property Owner — Wilbur "Bill" Boegli letter received January 26, 2015 X 17 4 Surrounding Property Owner — Rich Herget email dated January 25, 2015 X 18 5 Facebook post Reporter Herald Scott K. James date January 27, 2015 X 19 6 Surrounding Property Owner — Pat Boegli letter received February 4, 2015 X 20 7 Surrounding Property Owner — John E. Wallace, Sr and Olga Wallace letter received X February 6, 2015 22 8 Surrounding Property Owner — Diane Schwalm Reid letter received February 6, 2015 X 24 9 Surrounding Property Owner — Wayne and Christine Achziger letter received February 18, X 2015 25 10 Surrounding Property Owner — Woflgang Dirks letter received February 18, 2015 X 26 11 Surrounding Property Owner — Barbara U. Calkins letter received April 6, 2015 X 29 12 Surrounding Property Owner — James Plumb email received May 7, 2015 X 31 13 Surrounding Property Owner — Vickie Dougherty email received May 8, 2015 X 32 14 Surrounding Property Owner — Renata Meusch email received May 11 , 2015 X 35 15 Surrounding Property Owner — Robert Meusch email received May 11 , 2015 X 38 16 Surrounding Property Owner — Jordan Austin email received May 12, 2015 X 41 17 Surrounding Property Owner — Carol Pernicka email received May 12, 2015 X 43 18 Surrounding Property Owner — Lester R. Eastman email received May 12, 2015 X 44 19 Surrounding Property Owner — Harriette I . Eastman email received May 12, 2015 X 46 20 Surrounding Property Owner — Melvin Bickling email received May 13, 2015 X 51 21 Surrounding Property Owner — Gertrude Holtslag letter received May 13, 2015 X 52 22 Surrounding Property Owner — Carol Bosack letter received May 13, 2015 X 54 23 Surrounding Property Owner — Kent Sullivan letter dated May 7, 2015 X 56 24 Surrounding Property Owner — Olga Wallace email dated May 14, 2015 X 57 25 Surrounding Property Owner — Joyce Johnson email dated May 13, 2015 X 59 26 Surrounding Property Owner — M. P. Pete Straub email dated May 14, 2015 X Page 1 of 35 62 27 Surrounding Property Owner — Ellen Eliason Kisker Letter dated May 15, 2015 X 64 28 Surrounding Property Owner — Brett Mills email dated May 14, 2015 X 80 29 Surrounding Property Owner — Gary Oplinger letter dated May 6, 2015 X 82 30 Surrounding Property Owner - Patricia L. Boegli letter received May 15, 2015 X 83 31 Surrounding Property Owner — Don Casey letter received May 15, 2015 X 84 32 Surrounding Property Owner — Linda Glover email dated May 17, 2015 X 86 33 Surrounding Property Owner — Nancy Suppes email dated May 14 , 2015 X 87 34 Surrounding Property Owner — Ray and Betsey Nail email dated May 15, 2015 X 90 35 Surrounding Property Owner — Ed Suppes email dated May 16, 2015 X 92 36 Surrounding Property Owner — Tom and Diane Lord letter dated May 16, 2015 X 93 37 Surrounding Property Owner — Donald and Alice Anderson letter dated May 14, 2015 X 95 38 Surrounding Property Owner — Rosemary Sayre letter dated May 13. 2015 X 97 39 Surrounding Property Owner — Linda Liggon email dated May 19, 2015 X 99 40 Surrounding Property Owner - Rafael H . Garcia letter received May 18. 2015 X 100 41 Surrounding Property Owner — Eugene and Janet Martinez letter received May 18, 2015 X 101 42 Surrounding Property Owner — Jim Piraino letter dated May 19, 2015 X 105 43 Surrounding Property Owner — Keith Sapp email dated May 18, 2015 X 106 44 Surrounding Property Owner — Kim Pruett email dated May 17, 2015 X 107 45 Surrounding Property Owner — Tim Feinauer email dated May 18, 2015 X 120 46 Surrounding Property Owner — Bette Feinauer email dated May 18 , 2015 X 128 47 Surrounding Property Owner — Jeff and Mary Kroeger letter dated May 18, 2015 X 130 48 Surrounding Property Owner — Janet Ross letter dated May 18, 2015 X 132 49 Newspaper articles from the Greeley Tribune and Rifle X 137 50 Surrounding Property Owner — Shirley Hoskinson letter received May 18, 2015 X 139 51 Surrounding Property Owner — Rodney Smith letter received May 18. 2015 X 142 52 Surrounding Property Owner — NOCO HBA c/o Gregory A. Miedema letter dated May 19, X 2015 143 53 Surrounding Property Owner — Larry Sipes letter dated May 21 , 2015 X 146 54 Surrounding Property Owner — Roger and Joyce Amundson letter dated May 18, 2015 X 147 55 Surrounding Property Owner - Wilbur "Bill" Boegli letter received May 20. 2015 X 149 56 Surrounding Property Owner — Renata Meusch , Greeley Tribune - Letter to the Editor X Published May 20, 2015 Page 2 of 35 150 57 Correspondence — Dave Kisker and James Sharn email dated May 21 , 2015 X 153 58 Surrounding Property Owner — Janet Seter email dated May 25, 2015 X 154 59 Surrounding Property Owner — Kate Brown email dated May 25, 2015 X 157 60 Surrounding Property Owner - Melanie Schlotter letter dated May 25, 2015 X 159 61 Surrounding Property Owner — Glenn Schlotter letter dated May 25. 2015 X 161 62 Surrounding Property Owner — Scott Fenton email dated May 26, 2015 X 163 63 Surrounding Property Owner - Larry Glover email dated May 22 . 2015 X 164 64 Surrounding Property Owner - Wayne and Christine Achziger letter received May 26, 2015 X 166 65 Surrounding Property Owner — Paul Markus email dated May 27 , 2015 X 168 66 Surrounding Property Owner — Justin Johnson letter dated May 26, 2015 X 169 67 Surrounding Property Owner — Chelsey Johnson letter dated May 26. 2015 X 170 68 Surrounding Property Owner — Allen Aab email dated May 28, 2015 X 171 69 Surrounding Property Owner — Barbara Moe letter dated May 28, 2015 X 174 70 Surrounding Property Owner — Martin Homes c/o Andrew Martin letter received May 27. X 2015 176 71 Surrounding Property Owner — Sue Eggspuehler email dated May 28, 2015 X 177 72 Surrounding Property Owner — Jaime Cummings letter dated May 20, 2015 X 179 73 Surrounding Property Owner — Robert Smith email dated May 29, 2015 X 180 74 Surrounding Property Owner — Dale and Joyce Tennal email dated May 28, 2015 X 181 75 Surrounding Property Owner — Ronald Svoboda and Linda L. Groff letter dated May 26. X 2015 183 76 Surrounding Property Owner — Laura Steele letter received May 29, 2015 X 184 77 Surrounding Property Owner — Judy Leinweber email dated May 30, 2015 X 186 78 Surrounding Property Owner — Leonard Leinweber email dated May 30, 2015 X 187 79 Surrounding Property Owner — Wolfgang Dirks email dated June 1 , 2015 X 191 80 Surrounding Property Owner — Karl E. Scott email dated June 1 , 2015 X 193 81 Surrounding Property Owner — Kelly Steele letter received June 1 . 2015 X 194 82 Surrounding Property Owner — Connie Carter letter received June 1 . 2015 X 195 83 Surrounding Property Owner — Ken Carter letter received June 1 , 2015 X 196 84 Surrounding Property Owner — David Skold letter received June 1 , 2015 X 197 85 I Surrounding Property Owner — Ellen Skold letter received June 1 . 2015 X 198 86 Surrounding Property Owner — Pamela Thomas letter received June 1 , 2015 X Page 3 of 35 199 87 Surrounding Property Owner — Christopher and Brooke Benson letter received June 2, X 2015 200 88 Surrounding Property Owner — Eustolio Carmona letter received June 3, 2015 X 201 89 Surrounding Property Owner — Donnell Paul, AIA letter received June 4, 2015 X 202 90 Surrounding Property Owner — Perry Wertz letter received June 4, 2015 X 203 91 Surrounding Property Owner — Anita Corner letter dated June 3, 2015 X 204 92 Surrounding Property Owner — Deborah Johnston email received June 5, 2015 X 206 93 Surrounding Property Owner — Claude W Kage Ill letter dated June 5, 2015 X 207 94 Surrounding Property Owner — Dakota Worthley email dated June 5, 2015 X 210 95 Surrounding Property Owner — Joel and Barbara Robenhagen fax dated June 5, 2015 X 211 96 Surrounding Property Owner — Darby Kieler letter dated June 5, 2015 X 212 97 Surrounding Property Owner — Abby Glaser letter dated June 5, 2015 X 213 98 Surrounding Property Owner — Chloe Seiler email dated June 5, 2015 X 214 99 Surrounding Property Owner — David Jordan email dated June 5, 2015 X 215 100 Surrounding Property Owner — Paula Oransky email dated June 5, 2015 X 216 101 Surrounding Property Owner — Jeff Barber email dated June 5, 2015 X 217 102 Surrounding Property Owner — Derek Jolly email dated June 5, 2015 X 218 103 Surrounding Property Owner — Jack Fockler email dated June 5, 2015 X 219 104 Surrounding Property Owner — Kathleen Quam email dated June 7, 2015 X 221 105 Surrounding Property Owner — Susan Oplinger email dated June 6, 2015 X 222 106 Surrounding Property Owner — Jesse and Kiki Martinez letter dated June 5, 2015 X 224 107 Surrounding Property Owner — Debbra Smith email dated June 8, 2015 X 225 108 Surrounding Property Owner — Patrese E. Yarbrough letter received June 5, 2015 X 226 109 Surrounding Property Owner — Miguel Carmona letter received June 5, 2015 X 227 110 Surrounding Property Owner — Hanna Soffa email dated June 8, 2015 X 229 111 Surrounding Property Owner — Roper Marquiss email dated June 8, 2015 X 230 112 Surrounding Property Owner — Joe Shinagle email dated June 8, 2015 X 232 113 Surrounding Property Owner — Bob Parkin email dated June 8, 2015 X 234 114 Surrounding Property Owner — Jordan Kamps letter dated June 8, 2015 X 235 115 Surrounding Property Owner — Tammi Barber email dated June 8, 2015 X 236 116 Surrounding Property Owner — Jackie Wilson email dated June 8, 2015 X Page 4 of 35 237 117 Surrounding Property Owner — Nick Oransky email dated June 8, 2015 X 238 118 Surrounding Property Owner — Jan Wilderman email dated June 8, 2015 X 239 119 Surrounding Property Owner — Rene Wingerson letter received June 8. 2015 X 240 120 Surrounding Property Owner — Eric Wingerson letter received June 8, 2015 X 243 121 Surrounding Property Owner - J . Michael Earwood letter dated May 25. 2015 X 246 122 Surrounding Property Owner — Diana Beccue letter dated June 8, 2015 X 248 123 Surrounding Property Owner — Vince Kasperbauer letter dated June 9. 2015 X 249 124 Surrounding Property Owner — Steve Vondy letter dated June 9, 2015 X 250 125 Surrounding Property Owner - Natalie Rochester, MD letter dated June 9. 2015 X 253 126 Surrounding Property Owner — JP Morgan email dated June 9, 2015 X 255 127 Surrounding Property Owner — Tony Collins email dated June 9, 2015 X 256 128 Surrounding Property Owner - Mathew Cooley email dated June 9 . 2015 X 257 129 Surrounding Property Owner — Dan Venrick email dated June 9, 2015 X 258 130 Surrounding Property Owner — George Grier & Son LLC c/o Gregory Grier email dated X June 9, 2015 260 131 Surrounding Property Owner — Robert E. Tudor email dated June 9 . 2015 X 261 132 Surrounding Property Owner — Thomas O Evered email dated June 10 . 2015 X 263 133 Surrounding Property Owner — Gary Gettman letter dated May 30. 2015 X 264 134 Surrounding Property Owner — Val Robertson email dated June 9, 2015 X 265 135 Surrounding Property Owner — Rick Robertson email dated June 9, 2015 X 266 136 Surrounding Property Owner — Guy Zerfoss email dated June 9, 2015 X 268 137 Surrounding Property Owner — Gilbert Cruz email dated June 9, 2015 X 269 138 Surrounding Property Owner — Eric Gonzales email dated June 9. 2015 X 270 139 Surrounding Property Owner — Boyd Milhorn email dated June 9. 2015 X 271 140 Surrounding Property Owner — Timothy Preacher email dated June 9, 2015 X 272 141 Surrounding Property Owner — Tom Sprinkle email dated June 9 . 2015 X 273 142 Surrounding Property Owner — Eric Ashbrook email dated June 9, 2015 X 274 143 Surrounding Property Owner — Timothy email dated June 9, 2015 X 275 144 Surrounding Property Owner — Susan Oplinger email dated June 9, 2015 X 281 145 Surrounding Property Owner — Matthew Esquibel email dated June 9, 2015 X 282 146 Surrounding Property Owner — Ward Living LLC c/o Terry Ward letter received June 10, X 2015 Page 5 of 35 283 147 Surrounding Property Owner — Mark Axness email dated June 10, 2015 X 285 148 Surrounding Property Owner — Justin Prueter email dated June 10, 2015 X 286 149 Surrounding Property Owner — Russ Roberson and Dr. Denis Gonyon email dated June X 10, 2015 288 150 Surrounding Property Owner — Scott Fenton email dated June 10, 2015 X 289 151 Surrounding Property Owner — Rich Anchustegui email dated June 10, 2015 X 291 152 Surrounding Property Owner — Aimee DeGraffenried email dated June 10, 2015 X 293 153 Surrounding Property Owner — Letter to Editor Greeley Tribune June 10, 2015 X 297 154 Surrounding Property Owner — Miles Kaplanides letter received June 11 , 2015 X 298 155 Surrounding Property Owner — Kathleen Quam email dated June 10, 2015 X 299 156 Surrounding Property Owner — Tara Branham email dated June 11 , 2015 X 300 157 Surrounding Property Owner - Paula McGee email dated June 11 , 2015 X 301 158 Surrounding Property Owner — Josh Kruchten email dated June 11 , 2015 X 302 159 Surrounding Property Owner — Andrew Clem email dated June 11 , 2015 X 304 160 Surrounding Property Owner — David Kasperbauer letter dated June 9, 2015 X 306 161 Surrounding Property Owner — Waldo Trucking c/o Jason Waldo letter dated June 11 , X 2015 307 162 Surrounding Property Owner — Brad Hixson letter dated June 11 , 2015 X 308 163 Surrounding Property Owner — Diane Schwalm Reid letter received June 9, 2015 X 310 164 Surrounding Property Owner — Diane Schwalm Reid letter received June 11 , 2015 X 311 165 Surrounding Property Owner — Jeanne & Glenn DePriest letter received June 11 , 2015 X 313 166 Surrounding Property Owner — Richard and Karen Ford letter received June 11 , 2015 X 314 167 Surrounding Property Owner — Luke Morris email dated June 12, 2015 X 316 168 Surrounding Property Owner — Lanette Garcia email dated June 12, 2015 X 317 169 Asphalt plant proposal draws fire in Weld County — The Coloradoan X 324 170 Surrounding Property Owner — Steve Phillips email dated June 12, 2015 X 325 171 Surrounding Property Owner — Shane Behanish email dated June 12, 2015 X 326 172 Surrounding Property Owner — Erin Kunkel email dated June 12, 2015 X 327 173 Surrounding Property Owner — Keri Cook email dated June 12, 2015 X 328 174 Surrounding Property Owner — Nicole Berka email dated June 12, 2015 X 329 fr 175 Surrounding Property Pro e Owner — Frank Piacentino letter dated June 12, 2015 X 333 176 Surrounding Property Owner — Tim email dated June 12, 2015 X Page 6 of 35 335 177 Surrounding Property Owner — Anna Kester email dated June 12 , 2015 X 336 178 Surrounding Property Owner - Michael Loomis email dated June 12, 2015 X 337 179 Surrounding Property Owner — Marc Smith email dated June 12, 2015 X 338 180 Surrounding Property Owner — Nate Rutter email dated June 12 , 2015 X 340 181 Surrounding Property Owner — Brett Morris email dated June 12 , 2015 X 342 182 Surrounding Property Owner — Daniel Ross email dated June 12, 2015 X 344 183 Surrounding Property Owner — Monica Smolak email dated June 12. 2015 X 346 184 Surrounding Property Owner - Jerry Huber email dated June 12, 2015 X 347 185 Surrounding Property Owner — Jason Dack email dated June 12, 2015 X 348 186 Surrounding Property Owner — Joe Yearous email dated June 12, 2015 X 349 187 Surrounding Property Owner — Kami Fockler email dated June 12 , 2015 X 350 188 Surrounding Property Owner — Patrick Kelleher email dated June 13. 2015 X 351 189 Surrounding Property Owner — Josh Wright email dated June 13. 2015 X 352 190 Surrounding Property Owner — Danielle Culjat email dated June 13 . 2015 X 353 191 Surrounding Property Owner — William Rasek email dated June 13, 2015 X 354 192 Surrounding Property Owner - Nicole Singer email dated June 13. 2015 X 355 193 Surrounding Property Owner — Elizabeth Valdez email dated June 13, 2015 X 356 194 Surrounding Property Owner — Brad Kohlman email dated June 13, 2015 X fr 358 195 Surrounding Property Owner — Henrietta Archuleta email dated June 13, 2015 X 359 196 Surrounding Property Owner — Keith Couch email dated June 13, 2015 X 360 197 Surrounding Property Owner — Joshua Jensen email dated June 13. 2015 X 361 198 Surrounding Property Owner — Josh Wilson email dated June 19, 2015 X 362 199 Surrounding Property Owner — Donna Schmidt email dated June 13. 2015 X 363 200 Surrounding Property Owner — Kelsey Gill email dated June 14, 2015 X 364 201 Surrounding Property Owner — Todd Emery email dated June 13, 2015 X 365 202 Surrounding Property Owner — Gary Oplinger letter dated May 28, 2015 X 367 203 Surrounding Property Owner — Michael Martinez email dated June 14. 2015 X 368 204 Surrounding Property Owner — Micaela Martinez email dated June 14. 2015 X 369 205 Surrounding Property Owner — Rob Warne email dated June 15, 2015 X 371 206 Surrounding Property Owner — John Anest email dated June 15, 2015 X 372 207 Surrounding Property Owner — Brian R. Laartz email dated June 15, 2015 X Page 7 of 35 373 208 Surrounding Property Owner — John Cummings letter dated June 15, 2015 X 375 209 Surrounding Property Owner — Cynthia Aab email dated June 15, 2015 X 377 I 210 Surrounding Property Owner — Jon Nelson email dated June 15, 2015 X 379 211 Surrounding Property Owner — Erika Croonenberghs email dated June 15, 2015 X 380 212 Surrounding Property Owner — Curtis Heller email dated June 15, 2015 X 381 213 Surrounding Property Owner - Ron Pound email dated June 15, 2015 X 383 214 Surrounding Property Owner - Brett Goodell email dated June 15. 2015 X 385 215 Surrounding Property Owner — Scott Fenton email dated June 15, 2015 X 386 216 Surrounding Property Owner — Janet S Wiley email dated June 15, 2015 X 387 217 Surrounding Property Owner - Ellen Kisker email dated June 15, 2015 X 389 218 Surrounding Property Owner — Nunn Storage. LLC c/o Nancy Cooper letter received June X 15, 2015 390 219 Surrounding Property Owner — Mark Fulling letter received June 15. 2015 X 391 220 Surrounding Property Owner — Sharon Kahl letter received June 15. 2015 X 392 221 Surrounding Property Owner — Greg Engelbrecht letter received June 15, 2015 X 393 222 Surrounding Property Owner — Michael J . Johnson letter received June 15, 2015 X 394 223 Surrounding Property Owner — Mark Fulling letter received June 15. 2015 X 395 224 Surrounding Property Owner — David Engelbrecht letter received June 15, 2015 X 396 225 Surrounding Property Owner - Cory DeGroot letter received June 15, 2015 X 397 226 Surrounding Property Owner — Tim Haag letter received June 15, 2015 X 399 227 Surrounding Property Owner — Shelley Engelbrecht letter received June 15, 2015 X 400 228 Surrounding Property Owner - Jeff Moore letter received June 15, 2015 X 401 229 Surrounding Property Owner — Reyes Garcia letter received June 15, 2015 X 402 230 Surrounding Property Owner — Jerrod Brunemeier letter received June 15, 2015 X 403 231 Surrounding Property Owner — James Steel letter received June 15, 2015 X 404 232 Surrounding Property Owner - Gregory Hoff letter received June 15. 2015 X 405 233 Surrounding Property Owner — David Engelbrecht letter received June 15, 2015 X 406 234 Surrounding Property Owner — Kevin McRae letter received June 15. 2015 X 407 235 Surrounding Property Owner — Brian Nelson letter received June 15, 2015 X 408 236 Surrounding Property Owner — Bob Keil letter received June 15 . 2015 X 409 237 Surrounding Property Owner — Mark Ulrich letter received June 15. 2015 X Page 8 of 35 410 238 Surrounding Property Owner — Kimberly Ruskanen letter received June 15, 2015 X 411 239 Surrounding Property Owner — Earl Wellnitz letter received June 15, 2015 X 412 240 Surrounding Property Owner - Jerry Hooker letter received June 15. 2015 X 413 241 Surrounding Property Owner — Rutilo Blanco letter received June 15, 2015 X 414 242 Surrounding Property Owner - Michael Pettyjohn letter received June 15, 2015 X 415 243 Surrounding Property Owner - Dennis Mefford letter received June 15, 2015 X 416 244 Surrounding Property Owner — Tyler Martinez letter received June 15 . 2015 X 417 245 Surrounding Property Owner - Mike V letter received June 15, 2015 X 418 246 Surrounding Property Owner — Ron Scheirman letter received June 15. 2015 X 419 247 Surrounding Property Owner - Shanna Livengood letter received June 15, 2015 X 420 248 Surrounding Property Owner — Bradley Stacks letter received June 15, 2015 X 421 249 Surrounding Property Owner - Red Melby letter received June 15, 2015 X 422 250 Surrounding Property Owner - Logan West letter received June 15, 2015 X 423 251 Surrounding Property Owner — Daniel Krause letter received June 15, 2015 X 424 252 Surrounding Property Owner — Robert Allsup letter received June 15, 2015 X 425 253 Surrounding Property Owner — Jerimy A. Runner letter received June 15, 2015 X 426 254 Surrounding Property Owner — Dan Stringer letter received June 15, 2015 X 427 255 Surrounding Property Owner — David and Ginger Slatten letter received June 15, 2015 X 428 256 Surrounding Property Owner - Marcia Mendenhall letter received June 15, 2015 X 429 257 Surrounding Property Owner - Mike's Backhoe Service c/o Mike Markham letter received X June 15. 2015 430 258 Surrounding Property Owner — Lucinda Giblin letter received June 15, 2015 X 431 259 Surrounding Property Owner — Timothy Giblin letter received June 15. 2015 X 432 260 Surrounding Property Owner — Tom Nichols letter received June 15, 2015 X 433 261 Surrounding Property Owner — Michelle Burr letter received June 15, 2015 X 434 262 Surrounding Property Owner — Gabriel Dig letter received June 15. 2015 X 435 263 Surrounding Property Owner - David Neer letter received June 15, 2015 X 436 264 Surrounding Property Owner — Otis Burough letter received June 15, 2015 X 437 265 Surrounding Property Owner — Ron Nichols letter received June 15, 2015 X 438 266 Surrounding Property Owner — Dave Grewe letter received June 15. 2015 X 439 267 Surrounding Property Owner — Jim Moore letter received June 15, 2015 X Page 9 of 35 440 268 Surrounding Property Owner - Christopher Futo letter received June 15, 2015 X 441 269 Surrounding Property Owner — Levi Ramey letter received June 15, 2015 X 442 270 Surrounding Property Owner — Kenya Ragsdale letter received June 15, 2015 X 443 271 Surrounding Property Owner — Cyndee Martin letter received June 15, 2015 X 444 272 Surrounding Property Owner — Alonco Rodriguez letter received June 15, 2015 X 445 273 Surrounding Property Owner — Kelvin Kirkpatrick letter received June 15, 2015 X 446 274 Surrounding Property Owner — Brandon Lenoir letter received June 15, 2015 X 447 275 Surrounding Property Owner — Lee Vohs letter received June 15, 2015 X 448 276 Surrounding Property Owner — Ron Crutchfield letter received June 15, 2015 X 449 277 Surrounding Property Owner — Jamie Travis letter received June 15, 2015 X 450 278 Surrounding Property Owner — Barbara Barrs letter received June 15, 2015 X 451 279 Surrounding Property Owner — Dennis Sage letter received June 15, 2015 X 452 280 Surrounding Property Owner — John Christman letter received June 15, 2015 X 453 281 Surrounding Property Owner — Herman Benavidez letter received June 15, 2015 X r letter 454 282 Surrounding Property Owner Ensrud s ud ett received June 15, 2015 X 455 283 Surrounding Property Owner — Doug Nelson letter received June 15, 2015 X 456 284 Surrounding Property Owner — Daniel Ensrud letter received June 15, 2015 X 457 285 Surrounding Property Owner — Shantelle Farnese letter received June 15, 2015 X 458 286 Surrounding Property Owner — Shaylin Imlay letter received June 15, 2015 X 459 287 Surrounding Property Owner — Andrew Farnese letter received June 15, 2015 X 460 288 Surrounding Property Owner — Justin Nicolosi letter received June 15, 2015 X 461 289 Surrounding Property Owner — Geoff and Deborah Imlay letter received June 15, 2015 X 462 290 Surrounding Property Owner — Tim Theiler letter received June 15, 2015 X 463 291 Surrounding Property Owner — Danzel Robinson letter received June 15, 2015 X 464 292 Surrounding Property Owner — Jose Rodriguez letter received June 15, 2015 X 465 293 Surrounding Property Owner — Connie Micolichek letter received June 15, 2015 X 466 294 Surrounding Property Owner — Patrick Micolichek letter received June 15, 2015 X 467 295 Surrounding Property Owner — Josiah Farnese letter received June 15, 2015 X 468 296 Surrounding Property Owner — Bruce Serby letter received June 15, 2015 X 469 297 Surrounding Property Owner — Josh Apodaca letter received June 15, 2015 X Page 10 of 35 470 298 Surrounding Property Owner — Douglas Whittington letter received June 15, 2015 X 471 299 Surrounding Property Owner - Josh Apodaca letter received June 15, 2015 X 472 300 Surrounding Property Owner — Charles Johnson letter received June 15, 2015 X 473 301 Surrounding Property Owner — Matt Tomlinson letter received June 15, 2015 X 474 302 Surrounding Property Owner - Robert Beekman letter received June 15 , 2015 X 475 303 Surrounding Property Owner — Steve Lloyd letter received June 15. 2015 X 476 304 Surrounding Property Owner - Eric Horne letter received June 15, 2015 X 477 305 Surrounding Property Owner — Christopher Spanbauer letter received June 15, 2015 X Page 11 of 35 Diana Aungst Subject: FW: Martin Marietta Proposal Original message From: patlboegli@skybeam.com Date: 01/20/2015 4:23 PM (GMT-07:00) To: Julie Cozad <jcozad@co.weld.co.us> Subject: Martin Marietta Proposal Dear Julie, I am appreciative of the work you do to make Weld County a productive , pleasant and safe place to live and raise our families . The development of the Martin Marietta Asphalt plant (Reference PRE 14-0322) would be contrary to those goals for many families in Weld County. We live at 6577 County Road 56 adjacent to the proposed factory site. The factory would be noisy, visually unappealing and hazardous to our health . The land that this factory is being proposed is zoned for agricultural use, although there is some small industrial zoning nearby it is not nearly as large or toxic as this proposed plant. I oppose the proposed Martin Marietta development. Sincerely, Patricia L . Boegli 6577 County Rd 56 Johnstown , CO 80534 EXHIBIT II 46, Diana Aungst Subject: FW: Martin Marietta Proposal Original message From: patlboegli@skybeam.com Date: 01 /20/2015 9:30 PM (GMT-07:00) To: Julie Cozad <jcozad@co.weld.co.us> Subject: Martin Marietta Proposal Dear Commissioner Cozad, Thank you for your quick response to my email . Be assured I am in strong opposition to the Martin Marietta Asphalt Plant ( Reference PRE14-0322 . ) This plant is proposed on land that is currently zoned for agricultural use, no industrial use . Although there is some small industrial use land nearby, those businesses don't have the impact that the proposed Asphalt Plant will have on the surrounding residents. Weld County's mission statement is; "Leading with responsive, innovative and cost effective services." This Martin Marietta Plant would not be responsive to the health and well-being of local residents. The plant is not innovative due to all the negative impact Asphalt plants have had in other communities. It certainly wouldn't be cost effective when a person considers both immediate costs the county would have to accommodate the needs of this factory and the long term expenses. The main toxins emitted are; • Nitric oxide- responsible for lung irritation and promotion of asthma • Styrene (ethenylbenzene) - carcinogenic, memory loss , headaches and vertigo • Benzene - carcinogenic, especially leukemia , aplastic anemia , bone marrow abnormalities (children are acutely susceptible), neural birth defects including spina bifida and anencephaly • Methyl ethyl ketone- lab studies on animals show decreased fetal weight and malformations ; neurological , liver and kidney damage • Hydrogen sulfide - the level of emission of this gas cannot be controlled by the plant, considered to be a general toxin equivalent to hydrogen cyanide in toxicity, used as a poison gas in the Great War by the British (neurotoxin ) • Heavy metals - cadmium , arsenic, mercury and lead , these steadily poison the entire ecosystem building up in the water and on the land , virtually present for eternity and steadily accumulate 1 "Asphalt processing and asphalt roofing manufacturing facilities are major sources of hazardous air pollutants such as formaldehyde, hexane, phenol, polycyclic organic matter, and toluene . Exposure to these air toxics may cause cancer, central nervous system problems, liver damage, respiratory problems and skin irritation . " EPA Long term studies show clear correlation between community air pollution and overall mortality and decline in health; heart attacks, strokes, lung cancer and other cancers, childhood leukemia, impaired lung function, infant mortality, low birth weight and intellectual impairment. This will cause more of these diseases in Weld County. Workers in asphalt show increases in cancer from 10% to 400%. The community is also breathing in these same toxins as much as seven days per week from the plant. The toxins, especially the heavy metals, will accumulate over the years. Respectively, Patricia Boegli 2 Diana Aungst Subject: FW: Proposed Martin Marietta Plant between WCR 15 and WCR 13 From: Paul Markus [mailto:psmarkus@lpbroadband.net] Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 12:36 PM To: Julie Cozad Cc: Sean Conway Subject: Proposed Martin Marietta Plant between WCR 15 and WCR 13 Julie Cozad, We met in a meeting over a concrete recycling plant location a few years ago, in the Johnstown Community Center, when you were employed with Hall Irwin or Tetra Tech responsible for the choosing the location North of WCR 54 and South of WCR 56 West of WCR 15 and East WCR 13 at the railroad spur. Once again, I and many of my neighbors are against the location of an asphalt and concrete plant in our neighborhood. This time the proposed location is even closer to us, bordering our residential neighborhood. What would make you think that we want to deal with the asphalt toxins, excessive dust, odors, and a line of large trucks creating traffic issues and diesel odors. I want to remind you that you're not a representative of Tetra-Tech interests any longer but interests of the citizens of Weld county District 2. I and my neighbors don't want deal with Benzene, Nitric Oxide, Hydrogen Sulfide, Styrene, and the heavy metals, as well as formaldehyde, hexane, phenol, polycyclic organic matter and toluene. All of the above emissions fall within a 2 mile radius of the facility, and we will be located next to the facility. I am a supporter of jobs but in the right locations. Respectfully, Paul Markus E BIT 1 January 23, 2015 RECEIVED JAN 2 6 21115 Wilbur "Bill" J . Boegli Weld County Planet lg uepalunent 6577 County Road 56 GREELEY OFFICE Johnstown, CO 80534 bkboegli@lpbroadband . net Dear Ms. Aungst, I'm strongly opposed to the construction of the proposed Martin Marietta Asphalt Plant ( Reference PRE14-0322) in our neighborhood . Of the more than 100 family homes that would be adversely affected by the volatile organic contaminates, noise, hazardous dust and light pollution at this site, ours is most likely the worst. Our house is roughly 1800 feet downwind from the proposed asphalt plant, and 500 feet from the point where aggregate will be offloaded from rail cars to a conveyor belt. This is untenable, going from a peaceful, quiet lakeside home to another "Commerce City." I' m a retired Environmental Engineer with DOE for 30+ years. Aside from the obvious noise, odor and light pollution that comes with a plant like this, I also realize the potential for severe health problems from long-term exposure to carcinogens such as those emitted from the processing of asphalt. Also, the increased rail and truck traffic (CR 13 and Hwy 34) will exacerbate an already congested area . Surely you' re aware that Ft Collins residents are trying to shut down their Martin Marietta asphalt plant. Why should they be allowed to transfer all of that to our back door? Surely there is a more suitable site away from highly populated areas ! Please give thoughtful consideration to our great concerns ! Respe tfully, Wilbur J . Boegli E( err Diana Aungst Subject: FW: Martin Marietta Highway 34 Development proposal From: Rich Herget [mailto: richherget@aol.com] Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2015 9:53 PM To: Steve Moreno Subject: Martin Marietta Highway 34 Development proposal Steve, You are probably familiar with the proposed Highway 34 Development Proposal by Martin Marietta , it proposes to take a tract of land North West of Johnstown on county road 13 and develop it as a concrete and asphalt plant . As a resident of the nearby residential community and Ex- president of the HOA of the Indianhead Subdivision I would like you to understand how adversely this would affect the homeowners and nearby residents. There will be an open house meeting sponsored by Martin Marietta Tuesday January 27th at the Best Western Crossroads Inn and Conference Center in the Vista Room 5542 E US Highway 34, Loveland , CO 80537 at which they will be touting the great benefits that the Northern Colorado community will gain from this project being approved by the Weld County commissioners . The home owners and voters of the Indianhead Home Owners Association would like you to consider the potential damage to our community before you are asked to consider this proposal . Respectfully, Rich Herget 970 . 443 . 9420 richherget@aol . com Err --607--- 00..E Scott K James - Martin Marietta sets open house on asphalt plant.... Page 1 of 1 1 Starch face-book Scott K James 15 hrs Johnstown, CO Edited Martin Marietta sets open house on asphalt plant. http://bitiy/11110psf. I sure am glad that Julie Cozad, Barbara Kirkmeyer, Steve Moreno and Sean Conway will be voting no on This. After the years of support I have shown these individuals, I could not fathom them voting to approve something that would be so monumentally detrimental to the property values and quality of life of the citizens of Johnstown I am elected to represent who have invested their life savings to build their dreams in a community less than one half mile from this proposed eye and air quality sore. Glad these Weld County Commissioners are voting no on this. Because It is the common sense thing to do. Commissioners, you are voting no, right? Martin Marietta sets open house on proposed asphalt plant east of Loveland LOVELAND—Marlin Marietta Materials,which hopes to buitd asphalt and concrete plants al a site off U RFPORTFRHERALI C0M EXHIBIT 1 tiratiton https://www.facebook.com/scottkjames/posts/10206242237399767?comment id=1020624... 1 /27/2015 RECEIVED FEB 04 2015 Weld County Planning uepar anent Dear Ms. Au ngst, GREELEY OFFICE I' m strongly opposed to the Martin Marietta Asphalt Plant ( Reference PRE14- 0322) being considered near our community. This facility would pose a threat to our quality of life, not to mention the serious health problems that would result from long-term exposures to low level carcinogens. There are over 100 homes in Indian Head Estates that are within a one mile radius of the plant, and quite a few within a few hundred feet. This odorous eyesore will be noisy, create traffic hazards and congestion on County Road 13 and Hwy 34, and very likely have a severe impact on our property values. I cannot believe that a more appropriate site cannot be found with less adverse impact ! I would greatly appreciate your thoughtful consideration of our concerns. Sincerely, .14,± TOC1/4-e_,C ( i -u- 7 (,<,-14. 1/4,--\. ' �- ,_- r le-49( 5 6 5 7 EXHIBIT RFCEVED RE Pat- rtfre ? -��- o Weld County Dept. Of Planning Services FEB 6 2015 Diana Aungst Weld County Planning uepal invent 1555 N . 17th Avenue GREELEY OFFICE Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Diana, I am writing this letter to express my extreme opposition to Martin Marietta Materials' plans to build a plant on CR13 known as the `Highway 34' site. We understand that the proposition for the plant is to be reviewed by Weld County planning to assure compliance with rules and regulations and to assure that neighborhoods are not destroyed . Please reject the proposal for `Highway 34' site and prevent the destruction of our homes. It would seem that the plant could be located somewhere other than adjacent to our neighborhood . We live in the Indianhead Estates Subdivision located near the intersection of Highway 34 and CR15. My wife and I are retired and bought our home with the intent of living there until poor health forces our relocation to an assisted care facility. The neighborhood is an ideal place for elderly people to live in comfort with clean air and good neighbors. I believed that my investment in this home was a good way to preserve my savings for later in life. I cannot tell you how much it upset us to learn of the plans for the `Highway34' plant. We attended the open house offered by Martin Marietta to learn more about the plant and let the host know our feelings toward it. Most of our objections to the plant were met with a sympathetic shrug , but with little to offer in the way of meaningful discussion or answers. The open house did not comfort us at all. I wilt list some of the issues stressing us: • erosion of home values • toxic odors and related health concerns • train and machinery noises • dust from the truck traffic throughout the plant • truck traffic congestion on an already overloaded Highway 34 and county roads • visual ugliness It was difficult to assess the extent of the planned plant from the presentations provided at the open house. It was after I researched similar plants I came to fully realize what was being done to us in Indianhead Estates. The land proposed is extremely close to our subdivision so that the host of large, noisy, toxic fume emitters surrounded by a railroad used for transport of materials could not help but have an extremely serious impact on the people living in this subdivision. Not only would the odor, noise and ugliness be imposed on the hundreds of people living here but also the economic impact will be devastating. The exodus of neighbors would drive property values into the ground. Our investments in our homes will turn from stability to chaos eroding the enjoyment of our retirement years. Thank you for your consideration, John E. Wallace, Sr and Olga Wallace 27657 Blackfoot Road wallacejesra@ gmail.com PFCEfFfl January30, 2015 FEB 0 6 2015 Weld County Planning Council Weid County Planning UCpdi intent GREELEY OFFICE c/o Diana Aungst Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Members of the Weld County Planning Council: I am writing this letter to oppose Martin Marietta's construction of a concrete, asphalt, and aggregate crushing plant on WCR 13, one half mile south of Highway 34. My name is Diane Reid and I own 30 acres on WCR 15; my western boundary abuts the proposed site. My property is currently farmed by my cousin who lives one half mile from the site. I also have two uncles who live within % mile of the proposed site. My family home was a dairy farm located at the junction of WCR 15 and WCR 56. The 30 acres I own was part of that operation. I am not foolish enough to believe that this area will escape development. WCR 13 is now Colorado Boulevard and that corridor will be developed in spite of the fact that most residents would prefer to retain a more rural lifestyle. However, I am very concerned about the direction that development takes. The choice you make now will affect Weld County forever. Your decision as a planning council will either foster commercial and residential development or condemn the area to become Commerce City. Because WCR 13 is shared by Larimer and Weld, your decision will also affect Larimer County development. Only two miles west of this proposed asphalt/concrete plant at the intersection of I-25 and Hwy. 34 is some of the most coveted development property in northern Colorado. Heavy industry begets heavy industry; if you allow Martin Marietta to build this plant, only heavy industry will build next to it. The presence of a concrete/asphalt plant virtually condemns commercial and residential development for two miles on either side of WCR 13/Colorado Boulevard. I can't imagine that Larimer County or the Johnstown City Council would support the construction of this plant. You also need to consider traffic patterns, road access, and damage to infrastructure. When LaFarge proposed a concrete batch plant in 2008, they estimated 200-500 trucks per day on WCR 15. I can't imagine that this plant would have any less traffic. This would be a nightmare for CDOT because of what this truck traffic would do to traffic patterns on Hwy. 34. There is no traffic light at the junction of Hwy. 34 and WCR 13. I'm sure that a light is planned eventually because of Colorado Boulevard development, but that could be 10 years down the road. Train traffic will increase. Union Pacific tracks cross Hwy. 34 and the increased train traffic to the Martin Marietta site will block more traffic on 34. Heavy trucks also do considerable damage to existing infrastructure. This would affect both Hwy. 34 and 402, which is one mile south of the proposed site. Both are heavily traveled. My children and I have considered building on my property at some point. I can guarantee that if this plant is approved, none of us will ever live there. I would probably never be able to sell my property because no one would buy it, unless I lose all sense of ethics and sell to heavy industry. Current residents would not be able to sell their homes; no one in their right mind would purchase their homes. This plant would be a 24/7 operation, with no respite from the noise, lights, traffic, and noxious fumes. Where will prevailing winds take the fumes and particulates? The plant also borders a wetlands area on its east side. What affect will it have on the local ecosystem? Has an environmental impact survey been completed by an independent agency? EXHI 1 itiCArtift Reid-2 This brings me to my final point, and it is one that I doubt anyone else will address. My family began farming in that area in the late 1950s. The land is heavily sloped and sits below the Greeley-Loveland Ditch and the Farmer's Ditch. The water table is extremely high. Local farmers, all of whom are now deceased, knew that in the early 20th century an elaborate system of drains was constructed in all those fields. These drains are still functional. As far back as 1959, there were no available site maps of these drains, but every farmer knew that they had a significant effect on the movement of water in their fields. The person who farmed the proposed Martin-Marietta site was regularly dealing with unusual water flow patterns in those fields. I have looked at the site map for the Martin-Marietta plan. Although there is a proposed drainage pond, I contend that they will never be able to effectively manage the drainage issues because these drains affect the entire site. What will be moving into the water systems? The Thompson River is only a quarter mile south and Koenig Reservoir, a wetlands area, borders the property in question. Weld County does not need to promote the creation of a new Commerce City. Approval for Martin- Marietta to build this plant would forever condemn this prime property and all property two miles to the east and two miles to the west. The effects of this decision go far beyond the immediate neighborhood. Allowing the construction of this plant would prevent prime commercial and residential development along Colorado Boulevard. You can gain tax dollars for Weld County and not condemn the area in the process. Please do not allow Martin-Marietta or any heavy industry to invade this area. Sincerely, y7/ 1 i Diane Schwalm Reid dreid3014@gmail.com 502-681-2886 }r_- rriv71 r r I I - I • • _ I _ FCE -1 ACHZIGER P TA CT. JOHN TS OOWN, CO 80534 FEB 1_ 8 201 t,►,,� �2;.silmilc mil W end G EEES Of BCE Z tUth4(ZL aa- Atileelval .46 thad (,( _ ezAt Zit* atimete2 ate_ AreAe, iot e. /3 bpu pievaz aitzes /fidoutAtud Nia-vogaznwed- bat & t > > innarcipiat y tit aat eke at -to iiii4itgar, 7nalet ar aeVaa} . alt a dams, o Wt kola. tett ton 4 a.,dpiteatd-- Antea, fiLfrette. C L_ eete7t Pant den ritti Ai renizekte keebabac 4.04aC ?Oa- War C4-- ea/tare/a at/14w Pi 3. okioe-ija- atar ace_ ortheetaart &GA- b 'kt &oaf re-St atei EXHIBIT I Dear Diana Aungst, Thank you very much for meeting with Dave Kisker, Gary Oplinger and myself last Friday, 2/6. I was encouraged that we can succeed in our opposition to Martin Marietta's totally incompatible Highway 34 Development on the 131 acres immediately adjacent to our Indianhead West neighborhood. I would like to re-iterate our key objections and concerns about this Martin Marietta Development: • We live in one of the finest upscale residential communities between Loveland and Greeley. This quiet, beautiful residential and agricultural area is surrounded by new shopping centers like Centerra, two hospitals and restaurants. • Martin Marietta's heavy industrial development is so incompatible with this peaceful urban area that it will put the brakes on any future upscale residential and/or commercial development. Our area is completely contrary to any Colorado asphalt plant location such as North Greeley, which was rated industrial before the nearby low cost housing developments. • Up to 500 additional trucks and additional train traffic will overload county road 13, highway 34, and the nearby I-25/34 interchange. This kind of 24/7 noisy, dusty, and smelly industrial operation will have a significant negative impact on our quality of life. • According to Zillow, houses are currently valued from $440,000 to $880,000. Until a month ago, hoses sold very quickly close to their asking price. Now, serious buyers for the houses on the market on Apache Road and Hopi Trail have called us with great concern about the Martin Marietta Development and have indicated that they are not going to proceed with an offer if this development proceeds. • Property values will be impacted, because most people do not want to live next to such an environmental eyesore. • Many of our residents chose this area for their retirement. They have worked very hard to be able to afford to live their retirement years in our great neighborhood. Yesterday, 2/10, we learned of an even bigger threat to our community. The owner of the 133 acres North of the proposed Martin Marietta Development is proposing to convert their zoning from Agricultural to Industrial (I-2). Unlike the specific use request for the Martin Marietta Development, this rezoning to I-2 would allow the owners to use the land for just about any heavy industrial use and may not be subject to any further public hearing. We hear that the land may be used for Transloading, which would add even more noise, pollution, and 24/7 truck and train traffic. Both these land use and land developments seem totally inconsistent with adopted codes to maintain quality of life and property values for our immediate communities. Please consider the enormous negative impact these developments could have on the future of our great neighborhood. Sincerely ri winr: arn-75Th v 7// g / fr FEB 18 2015 Wolfgang Dirks Weld County Hundvtg Ucr)uj11l1CM President, Indianhead West HOA GREELEY OFFICE 6825 Apache Road, Johnstown, CO EXHIBIT (530)414-3943 1 10 wolfdirks@earthlink.net APR 0 6 2015 30 March 2015 weld County t:upa, towilt GREELEY OFFICE Weld County Planning Commission This letter is to voice my strong opposition to the proposed rezoning of a portion of Section 13, Township 5N, Range 67W, so that Martin-Marietta can build an asphalt plant there. The area was established as a farming community many years ago, with the objective of raising crops and livestock to produce food for consumption by the general public, while affording the landowners with the rural lifestyle which they desire. Construction and operation of an asphalt plant will introduce heavy truck traffic, air pollution, water pollution, and noise, while affording no benefit to the surrounding residents. I own property, located about 1/2 mile from the proposed plant, which is a certified organic farm. Operation of an asphalt plant, with its toxic emissions, so close to the farm will raise serious questions about the ability to maintain certification. I urge the Planning Commission to respect the wishes of the community to maintain a high quality of rural life, rather than turn all of Weld County into an industrial jungle. Barbara U. Calkins 13905 Berry Rd. Golden, CO 80401 303--279-4153 kencalkins@prodigy.net EXHIBIT (1 un eat zencalkins@prodigy.net - att.net Mail https://us-mg205.mail.yahoo.com/neo/launch?.partner=sbc&.rand=6n... PETITION.docx l Download v 1 of 1 PETITION: THE UNDERSIGNED AFFECTED PERSONS OF THE AREA NEAR MARTIN MARIETTA M PROPOSED PROJECT FOR DEVELOPMENT OF AN ASPHALT, CONCRETE, AGGREGATE FACILITY ON 131 ACRES LOCATED '/z MILE SOUTH OF HWY 34, EAST OF WELD COUN 13/LARIMER COUNTY ROAD 1 AND NORTH OF WELD COUNTY ROAD 56 OPPOSE WE APPROVAL OF A USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT FOR THIS PROJECT. SIGNATURE NAME ADDRESS EMAIL fb t akat riu - t_3 9 o s 13 £ KR11 PIP Orel Jr a it 4 E:4-L w o lio / • tS 'VolIl d ., AdM et /0 X1-0 / I of 1 3/8/2015 2:48 PM STOP MARTIN MARIETTA FROM DESTROYING OUR NEIGHBORHOOD Neighborhood citizens must join together to protect our community. Concerns due to proposed ASPHALT, CEMENT, and AGGREGRATE CRUSHING PLANTS: 1/Propertv values decrease by 50% - Research conducted by the Blue Ridge Environmental Defense league has revealed that the creation of asphalt processing plants near residential places has decreased the value of real estate by around 50%. 2/Significant increase in truck and railroad traffic - As an example, residents near the asphalt plant in Fort Collins see as many as 300 trucks a day come in and out of the plant. 3/Noise, Lights, Odors - Typically these plants operate 24/7. As a result, those near the plants have constant noise, lights, odors, and traffic. Following is an excerpt pulled from an article published 9/4/2014 about a plant in Brunswick County's Fletcher Estates. By Jason Gonzales - Jason.Gonzatcs(it stamcwsonlinc.com Published: Thursday, September 4, 2014 at 10:43 a.m. One symptom of living next to an asphalt plant is insomnia, say residents of Brunswick County's Fletcher Estates. And the constant hum of Highland Asphalt's operations is a slow push toward insanity. "Everybody has either looked to sell or rent out their homes," said resident Mike Fryar. While county officials have worked to mediate their complaints about noise, smells and light from the industrial neighbor, the focus is on ensuring the same situation never happens again. The smell is the hardest part, Fryar said. "It's like a fog of odor," he said. Imp: w%vw st:nluewsunlinc.cum•articic'2U 14(1904 AIt I ICL(;.Sr I40909SS6.'p= I&tc=ptt&tc-ar 4/Health Issues Toxicity — Asphalt plants emit fumes that are known to contain toxins. Various government agencies, including the U.S. EPA has given statements about asphalt processing plants and other asphalt manufacturing facilities throwing out air pollutants like hexane, phenol, polycyclic organic matter, formaldehyde and toluene. The exposure to these dangerous toxins can cause various central nervous system problems as well as liver damage, respiratory problems, cancer and severe skin irritation. Carcinogenic Effects — the trucks that carry the asphalts to and from the plants are exposed to chemicals like polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons as well as other very fine condensed particulates. Tests conducted by the New Jersey Dept of Health and Senior Services have shown that the polycyclic hydrocarbons can be carcinogenic to humans. These trucks seem to be a source of the problem. They throw out large amounts of emissions that have been considered to be harmful to human health. Another study by the New Jersey agency says that the fumes coming out of an asphalt plan "may cause wheezing, coughing, headaches, and nausea. 5/Fugitive Contaminantes 6/Environmental Issues 7/Community Aesthetics From this To this • • __.Q tt)J' a te. - .- -- ,t •• •w -• f http://onthewight.com/20 12/09/14/what-i is-1 i ke-to-I i ve-near-an-aspha lt- plant/http://www.ehow.com/list 6030055 health-issues-asphalt-plants.html. Diana Aungst From: James Plumb pwplumb1@juno.com] Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2015 7:25 PM To: Diana Aungst Subject: Case # USR 15-0027 Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Case # USR 15-0027 For Public Record Date: 7May15 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Diana and Commissioners, We (my wife and I) have recently become aware of a plan to install an asphalt processing plant near our home in Indian Head Estates. I would like to state our reasons for opposing this installation. Our community is presently a mixed agriculture and residential one, very pleasant with just enough small business in the area to make things convenient. We think that placing a heavy industrial plant in the midst of this community would degrade the quality of life we enjoy here. Some of the reasons we believe this to be true are as follows. 1 . The proposed site is to be in operation on a 24/7/365 basis with the following activities a. Heavy truck traffic entering and exiting US34 via WCR 13. b. Increased railway traffic on the railroad the runs to the SW of us. c. Industrial lighting over a large area adjacent to us. d. The odor of the asphalt operations wafting into our neighborhood. 2. Increase of traffic on US34. This corridor is already very busy and congested especially in the morning and evening rush hours and often at the noon hour. We find it even now difficult to enter US34 from WCR15 (our access road). The proposed additional truck traffic can only make this worse 3. WCR 13 has recently been paved, as it will become the access road for the new industrial activity it seems that it may be overburdened and need repair and/or upgrading at taxpayer expense. 4. Presently we have a lovely view of Long's Peak beyond the farm land in the foreground. If that foreground becomes an asphalt processing plant our view would be greatly degraded. Sent from my iPad. To sum up we are concerned with increased: Noise (trucks, trains Pollution (dust, odors) Traffic increases Night time Light Pollution Visual Degradation All this represents a severe reduction in our enjoyment of our home and a degradation of the community. We think we should continue to enjoy the present agricultural and residential mix we have now and which was in place when our subdivision was planned. Sincerely, James and Shirley Plumb EXHIBIT 27876 Arikaree Rd. Johnstown, CO 80534 jwplumb1Ajuno.com Old School Yearbook Pics View Class Yearbooks Online Free. Search by School & Year. Look Now! http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/554c106783ee5106607afst02duc 2 Diana Aungst From: Vickie Dougherty [vickiedbaskets@hotmail.com] Sent: Friday, May 08, 2015 6:40 PM To: Diana Aungst Subject: Martin Marietta case #USR 15-0027 Dear Weld County Commissioners, I have lived in Indianhead Estates for 35 years I have some major concerns about Martin Marietta moving into out quiet community. Truck traffic will be over 1,000 trips a day the wear and tear alone on the roads will be dramatic. US Highway 34 is already congested not sure how it could handle this added traffic most times leaving my subdivision I have to wait up to 10 minutes to work my way onto Highway 34. I have seen the noise from the Highway increase ten fold since we have lived here due to the increase in traffic. The increase in train traffic will be a huge impact on our community again affecting the congestion on Highway 34. Now the backup from the trains coming from Windsor causes traffic to backup to Centerra and County road 17. Since they want a 24/7 operation this would occur all the time. The noise from the connecting and disconnecting train cars, whistles blowing 24 hours a day would change our peaceful residential and farming community. We all have at least an acre of land which takes a lot of care. I spend time out side all summer taking care of my yard the smell from the plant would be horrifying and would make it impossible to entertain out side. When people move to the country they have to be able to put up with their new surrounding smells, traffic etc but since we have all been out her first I think it is unfair of anyone to expect us to compromise our way of living for Martin Marietta . I work in the tri- city area and am around people all day. I moved out here 35 years ago to be able to have peace and tranquility. I have people come out to my house and say this is a little slice of heaven . PLEASE don 't take that away from me. Thanks for listening Vickie Dougherty 27171 Hopi Trail Indainhead Estates Vickiedbaskets@hotmail.com 970 667 5011 EXHIBIT 1 Diana Aungst From: Renata Meusch [rmeusch@skybeam.com] Sent: Monday, May 11 , 2015 9:02 PM To: Diana Aungst Subject: RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development - Renata Meusch Case # USR 15-0027 For Public Record May 11, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 970-353-6100 ext 3524; Fax: 970-304-6498 daungst@weldgov.com Weld County Commissioners: RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development As a future homeowner in Indianhead Estates, Lot 21, Block 3, in the Southwest corner of the subdivision, I have the following concerns with this proposed use by MMM . 1. Consistent development with Larimer County and the 2534 area . 2. Increased traffic on Highway 34 at WCR 13. 3. Negative impacts on our lifestyle. 4. Concerns about noise, pollution, odor, and lighting. Below I plan to express my concerns regarding the points raised above. Let's be a good neighbor with Larimer County and propose development consistent with the 2534/Johnstown/Centerra area: I work in the Bank of Colorado building on the SE corner of 1-25 and Hwy 34. In recent months, I have seen the building of Clear View Behavioral Health, a large indoor shooting range, along with several apartment complexes. There are future plans for Bass Pro Shops, Scheel's Sporting Goods, Comfort Inn & Suites, restaurants, etc. I feel what Martin Marietta Materials (MMM) is proposing is totally counterintuitive to the present and future development in the area, and will put a negative mark on Weld County. As you drive East on Highway 34, you see the sign for the entrance into Weld County right before WCR 13. According to the Weld County Department of Planning Services website, "Weld County is the richest agricultural county in the United States east of the Rocky Mountains." At this important gateway on Hwy 34 and WCR 13 as people are heading east from the Rocky Mountains, isn't agriculture what we in Weld County want to showcase, or at least a Commercial Mixed Use like the 2534 area? I understand development might eventually happen at this site, but is this proposed use by MMM compatible with the neighborhood and the beautiful gateway into Weld County? Of the 13 properties identified in MMM's application (along with another site east of Windsor), even MMM gave a neighbor criterion score of this proposed location as a 0 'zero ! ). EXHIBIT Personal experience with daily driving and traffic issues on Hwy 34: Right now, I commute from west Greeley to the 2534 area for work. I work for Thrivent Financial on the 3rd floor of the Bank of Colorado building and my office faces east. Two and a half years ago, it was a 13-minute one way commute. Presently, it takes me almost 18 minutes. I not only witness traffic congestion and accidents on my commute, but I see the same from our office windows on a daily basis, all times of the day, not only from daily commuters, but from the already growing truck traffic and the trains that cross Highway 34. The proposed site by MMM "is expected to generate 1120 daily truck trips into the site, and grow to an estimated 2260 by the year 2035, mostly during peak summer demand." With the current business growth and the proposed businesses in this area, along with the people who will be vacationing in Colorado during the summer months, how can Hwy 34 support the extra truck demand on the existing highway infrastructure, and will emergency responders be able to get through the congestion that this will add to the area? According to MMM's application, "CDOT already has plans to someday have a signal light installed at the intersection of WCR 13 and Highway 34 due to the amount of traffic that is expected at this intersection", but will a single traffic light really help? Negative impacts on our lifestyle: Full disclosure, my husband and I recently purchased a lot in Indianhead Estates (December 2014), and are in the process of building our pre-retirement "dream home" . We spotted this lot about 4 years ago, and after putting two sons through school (WCSD #6) and college (CSU), we finally felt we were ready to buy our "paradise acre". We have both been productive community members in Greeley for 18 years, and are ready to move from the city to a more rural atmosphere with a home on a little bit of land (1 acre). Two weeks after we closed on the lot, we were invited to the MMM Neighborhood Meeting. We will be directly impacted by this proposed use by MMM, as we are on Lot 21, Block 3, in the Southwest corner of the subdivision. Our once anticipated view of the Rocky Mountains will be eroded, and the deck we have planned facing the SW is proposed to showcase an aggregate plant, rather than the prime agricultural land in Weld County we thought we would be able to enjoy. We knew eventually this farm ground would be developed, but not in our wildest dreams did we expect a heavy industrial development. Other Concerns of noise, pollution, odor, lighting: 1. Noise: In the Noise Analysis, MMM does state that it may exceed the noise limits. How is this ever acceptable? There will also be vibration from the trains, wheel noise from the train turning on the tracks (trains aren't meant to go in a circle), banging of cars as they start and stop, etc. They even state that their nighttime operations could exceed the noise limits. 2. Pollution: In the Air Quality Study, were all pollution sources considered? What about dust, aggregate handling, etc.? 3. Odor: Odors "may be noticeable". What does this mean? Will we not be able to sit outside on our patios in Indianhead Estates, or even tolerate this inside our homes? How about Comfort Suites and their new proposed water slide and pool area? Will the guests at this hotel, not to mention the patients in the rehab or behavioral centers, or the people working at the local businesses be able to enjoy some time outside? 4. Lighting: Will the lighting be dark sky compliant? In summary, I feel that the plans proposed by MMM are not compatible in the area of Highway 34 and WCR 13 . Weld County needs to be a good neighbor and be consistent with the developments already planned in Larimer County (2534) and the surrounding areas, and not put added stress on the infrastructures already being taxed in this beautiful gateway area between Weld and Larimer counties. I want MMM to be able to bring "more than 100 jobs to Weld"; I just feel that a different location would be preferable for this type of heavy industry. Sincerely, Renata Meusch 2 1146 52nd Ave Ct Greeley, CO 80634 (soon to be 27647 Hopi Trail, Johnstown, CO 80534) 970-590-4315 Please confirm that you have received this email to rmeusch@skybeam.com. 3 Diana Aungst From: Renata Meusch [rmeusch@skybeam.com] Sent: Monday, May 11 , 2015 8:59 PM To: Diana Aungst Subject: RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development Case # USR 15-0027 For Public Record May 11, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 970-353-6100 ext. 3524; Fax: 970-304-6498 daungst@weldgov.com Weld County Commissioners: RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development I have concerns that the proposed use will adversely impact and is incompatible with the surrounding neighborhood's current agricultural and residential use and therefore am strongly opposed to the Martin Marietta Materials, (MMM), Highway 34 Development application for the proposed heavy industrial use of a concrete and asphalt aggregate plant. After a two year legal process of resolving an issue with a lateral irrigation ditch, my wife and I closed on the purchase of Lot 21, Block 3, Indianhead West in the Southwest corner of the subdivision. We chose this lot to build our home for the peace, serenity, open space and views it provides, as well as the proximity to our aging parents in Loveland, CO. The above application was not disclosed to us by the seller and was made public shortly after our closing. Our lot will be one of the closest to the railroad loop MMM proposes to construct on the site, less than 100 yards away. The noise from the trains loading and unloading, coupling and de-coupling will indeed make it difficult to enjoy our patio and back yard and reduce our quality of life and that of our neighbors as well. The proposed silos and material piles will also erode our view of the Front Range as they cannot "not" be seen. The application proposes to allow MMM 24/7/365 operation of the facility. This will directly and adversely impact our lifestyle and the use and enjoyment of our property through increased truck and train traffic, increased noise and vibration, pollution, odor and artificial lighting. In its own March 2015 site assessment report on 13 potential project sites, MMM rates the proposed WCR 13 site as "0" for compatibility with the surrounding neighborhood and existing agricultural and residential uses. This proposed use is also incompatible with the existing uses to the West which are mostly commercial office and retail and include a rehabilitation hospital only one mile away, as well as a major medical center and hospital less than three miles away. I will now address each of these concerns individually. Traffic and Noise: -The application states there will be initially 1129 vehicle trips with heavily loaded trucks merging onto Highway 34 each day, growing to 2260 vehicle trips with heavily loaded trucks by 2035, each taking at least 20 seconds to cross highway 34. This will exacerbate an already overcrowded traffic flow on Highway 34 and WCR 13 further compounding an existing traffic problem and potentially slowing response times for emergency service vehicles. HfBIT 11 6 • s t. s- -This increased heavy truck traffic is not a typical use and will cause accelerated road deterioration and added road maintenance and repair expense to Weld County tax payers now and in the future. -Current heavy traffic on Highway 34 and WCR 13 already presents traffic safety risks to area residents and farmers, including children at school bus stops, pedestrians and cyclists. These risks will be compounded by the increased truck traffic and the additional congestion created as well as the 24/7/365 use MMM proposes. -Increased train traffic crossing Highway 34 delivering raw material to the site will also compound existing traffic congestion not only on Highway 34, but also on WCR 13, 15, 56 and State Highway 402. The noise from the train movements, car switching, loading and unloading, car wheels, train engines constantly running, as well as the horns and whistles, will adversely affect our quality of life. This is of particular concern to me on our lot as we would be so close to the proposed train loop and the wheel noise and vibration would be even more excessive with the circular flow of the trains proposed. -MMM states the proposed operation will just barely meet noise requirements and that their night operations may exceed residential noise limits which should never be acceptable. Odor, Pollution and Lighting: -MMM states that occasional odors may emanate from their asphalt plants and at times be noticeable but would not be at level that would cause adverse health effects. I have been a community banker for nearly 30 years and have banked a customer in the aggregate and asphalt business. I made many inspection trips to their plant at various times of the year and believe me the odor is certainly not occasional; rather it is consistent and foul. This would certainly reduce my quality of life and the enjoyment of my southwest facing patio. They state that they will comply with odor regulations. However, compliance with these regulations alone is certainly NOT sufficient to demonstrate compatibility with the community. -Regarding pollution, the MMM Air Quality Study does not address the constant dust and particles that will be generated from their crushing and hauling operations. There is no specific plan to mitigate the dust. This is yet another factor that will erode the quality of life for the surrounding community, which does not include all of Northern Colorado like their application suggests. -MMM proposes to be able to operate 24/7/365. The lighting required for night operations would light up the surrounding area, including the back yards of the many nearby residences. They make no mention of using dark skies compliant lighting, which should be required. In summary, all of the above factors clearly support that the proposed heavy industrial use is not a compatible use with the current agricultural and residential uses of the surrounding community, the existing Agricultural zoning or the current commercial and retail uses directly to the West. In their application, MMM suggests that this area is somehow intended for a heavy industrial use like they propose. However, according to a composite map of the master plans of Johnstown, Windsor, Greeley and Loveland, from the Northern Front Range Metropolitan Planning Organization, none show a planned or intended heavy industrial use on this parcel or along the US-34 corridor. Here is a link to a copy of their map: http://ppl. ug/WVScExofloo/ . Therefore, this application should be denied. Highway 34 and WCR 13 is the Western Gateway to Weld County, the largest and most productive Agricultural County in Colorado and one of the top in the country. Entry to our County from the North, East and South hold well planned industrial and commercial areas which are properly separated from light commercial and residential uses, unlike what MMM proposes here. MMM is considering several sites which are much better suited for this operation, with rail access and in areas that are already planned and zoned for and compatible with heavy industrial uses like what they propose, such as the Windsor Industrial Park. These alternate locations make much more sense than the WCR 13 location. Thank you for the opportunity to express my opinion on this matter. Sincerely, 2 Robert L. Meusch 1146 52nd Ave. Ct. Greeley, CO 80634 970-590-9624 Please confirm receipt of this email to rmeusch@skybeam.com . 3 Diana Aungst From: Jordan Austin [Jordan.Austin@Thrivent.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2015 3:36 PM To: Diana Aungst Subject: Case #USR15-0027 Case #USR 15-0027 For Public Record May 12, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 970-353-6100 ext 3524; Fax: 970-304-6498 daungst@weldgov.com Weld County Commissioners: RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development Please take steps to protect Weld County and enhance its image. Bring the proposed Martin Marietta materials plant to Weld County but place it in an area better suited for its kind of operations. I own a financial planning practice at 4848 Thompson Parkway in northern Johnstown. The area is quickly becoming a destination attraction. Our clients come from as far away as Jefferson, El Paso and Morgan Counties to visit us because they can tack on dinner at Bonefish Grill, a trip to Greeley's Model Railroad Museum or a visit to Rocky Mountain National Park with ease. It's my contention that the Martin Marietta materials operation would significantly diminish the desire of people from out of the area to visit or relocate to our part of northern Colorado. The materials plant isn't compatible with the current or proposed makeup of our area. New homes are being built just to the south of our office, new apartments to the southwest. Our area is quickly turning into a mixed use residential and business community. A materials operation that will increase semi truck traffic and train traffic could significantly snarl traffic for our clients and for those people moving to our area. I've been told that even Martin Marietta itself gave the plant a neighbor criterion score of zero in its Site Selection report. That's not the mark of a good neighbor for people who want to walk their dogs or watch their kids learn to ride two wheel bikes. 1 grew up in Greeley and Weld County and my whole life have had to fight the negative connotations that come from the "cow town" image and more recently the cavalier perception of the fracking industry. Having a materials plant at the major western entrance to Weld County will make it even more difficult to defend the image of the county. Furthermore, the materials plant could make it difficult to even get into Weld County. I recently saw an estimate that 54,000 cars per day use US 34 near my office. Martin Marietta, at a public forum, estimated that its materials plant will generate 1 , 120 daily truck trips into its site initially. That number is expected to grow to 2,260 by 2035. When a train carrying Vestas turbines crosses US 34 today the backups extend for at least a mile. Imagine what even a fraction of the additional truck traffic will do that backup. And what happens when Martin Marietta begins having trains use those same tracks further exasperating an already difficult problem. EXHIBIT 1 I fear that people won't even attempt to get into Weld County due to traffic concerns. And will people want to relocate to that area if the traffic doesn't even subside in the evening? I understand the materials plant is supposed to be a 24 hour a day operation eventually, meaning traffic, noise and smells will never stop. I grew up in Weld County and want it to remain a good place to raise children. And I don't want those children who grow up there today to fight the same PR battles that I continue to fight. So let's not welcome them with a materials plant that smells and snarls traffic. Let's continue to welcome them to wide open spaces where agriculture is the focus and salt of the earth people the draw. I hope my office and its surroundings will be a welcoming place for people to come, look out my third story building and wish that they could have the life they see out of the window. Please bring the materials plant, and its jobs, to Weld County. Just put it in a place more suited for heavy industrial use. Not at the gateway to my home town. Not near my current office. Not near hundreds of people's homes. Instead of the materials plant, bring western Weld County a show piece that sparkles. Thank you. Jordan K. Austin , CLTC®, FIC Financial Consultant Mountain Plains Group West CA License 0197083 Thrivent Financial® 4848 Thompson Pkwy , Suite 340, Johnstown, CO 80534-6431 Office: 970-667-7340 Email: jordan.austin(a)_thrivent.com Web: www.thrivent.com/fr/jordan.austin nacebook.com/mountainplainsgroup.thrivent •nlinkedin.com/in/jordanaustinthrivent Vtwitter.com/jordanaustin trik THRIVENT FINANCIAL Appleton, Wisconsin • Minneapolis, Mnresots Thrivent.com • 800-847-4836 • gri It in Please do not use email to request, authorize, or affect the purchase or sale of any security or insurance product or service, to send fund transfer instructions, or to effect any other transactions, as we are not authorized to accept these requests in an electronic format. Any such requests, orders, or instructions that you send will not be accepted and will not be processed. If you need immediate assistance with your brokerage account, please call 800-THRIVENT, and say "Securities Brokerage Services." Insurance products issued or offered by Thrivent Financial, the marketing name for Thrivent Financial for Lutherans, Appleton, WI. Not all products are available in all states. Securities and investment advisory services are offered through Thrivent Investment Management Inc., 625 Fourth Ave. S., Minneapolis, MN 55415, a FINRA and SIPC member and a wholly owned subsidiary of Thrivent. Thrivent Financial representatives are registered representatives of Thrivent Investment Management Inc. They are also licensed insurance agents/producers of Thrivent. Fee-based investment advisory services are available through qualified investment advisor representatives only. For additional important information, visit Thrivent.com/disclosures. Thrivent Investment Management Inc. outgoing and incoming email is electronically archived and recorded and is subject to review, monitoring and/or disclosure to someone other than the recipient. 2 This message contains confidential information intended only for the above addressees and may contain information that is proprietary or legally privileged. If you received this message in error, please notify us and delete the original message. You must obtain permission from Thrivent Financial to use its logo on all materials. Failure to do so could result in legal action. 3 Diana Aungst From: Carol Pernicka [tracker@Ipbroadband. net] Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2015 5: 14 PM To: Diana Aungst Subject: re: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development Case # USR 15-0027 For Public Record May 12, 2015 Weld County Commissioners do Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Ave. Greeley, CO 80631 Weld County Commissioners: RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development I am writing to express my dismay at the proposed Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development. I am very strongly opposed to this proposal. It is totally incompatible with the neighborhoods surrounding the location. This is an area of rural homes surrounded by agricultural land; it is not an industrial area and our lifestyle and ability to come and go from our homes as well as enjoy our property will be severely effected . Truck Traffic: The size and weight of the trucks will do damage to the surrounding county roads. None of the roads: Weld CR 13, 15, 56, 402 or Larimer CR 20 and 3 are designed with this traffic in mind. It is already difficult to exit from lndianhead Estates at CR 15 onto Highway 34, particularly during high-traffic times of day or when the current trains stop traffic. The increased traffic bottlenecks due to cars backing up at intersections will be substantially increased. The noise and odor from the trucks will add to the traffic noise we already hear from Highway 34. Traffic on 402 is already heavy, and it will be greatly increased by so many additional trucks at all hours of the day, seven days a week. There will be considerably greater congestion, as well as safety concerns to bicyclists, pedestrians, children at bus stops, and farmers. Additionally, as a taxpayer, I note there is nothing that says who will pay for the major increases of wear and tear on the roads from this increased heavy traffic. Train Traffic: Traffic already backs up on Highway 34 and Weld CR 13, 15, 56, and 402 with the current train traffic. The greatly increased train traffic will make it very difficult for neighborhood residents to gain access to and from their neighborhoods as we must wait while increased train traffic causes additional road congestion and backups. Additionally, the train noise, whistles at all road crossings day and night, and noise from banging train cars as they stop and start will have a severe detrimental effect on our lifestyle in Indianhead Estates. We have grave concerns about the noise from the conveyor EXHIBIT system, the vibration from the trains and rail cars as they move along to be loaded and unloaded, and the odors from the idling trains during I _Ai_ this process. If this asphalt plant runs 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, at OA. a 1 it will make it extremely difficult to enjoy the outdoor quiet lifestyle to which we are accustomed. Pollution: We are concerned about dust, and the lack of specifics in the proposed plan for how they will deal with it. How do they plan to prevent dust and particles from impacting the clean air we currently enjoy? Will they attempt to deal with the dust after the fact? The Martin Marietta air quality study does not address all factors that will cause pollution from the asphalt and concrete manufacturing and the concrete and asphalt recycling. Impact on wildlife: We currently have resident foxes as well as rabbits, owls, raptors, bats, and numerous birds and other small mammals. The impact of the noise, odor, nighttime lights and traffic will be very detrimental to these animals. The loss of our current dark nighttime skies will harm the nocturnal animals as well as the residents' nighttime lifestyle. This proposal does nothing to provide dark skies compliance. In summary, the impact of this project on our community will be huge. There are no benefits to our community of Indianhead Estates. It is obvious that there are other suitable sites for such a large industrial complex, but this one, right next to our homes, is not one. There is nothing that supports agriculture about this project; it does not depend on agriculture and would have an adverse effect on surrounding farmland. The agricultural lands do not use asphalt and concrete; this will change the use of the land from agricultural to heavy industrial. It is a totally inappropriate development in a residential and agricultural area and will cause irreparable harm to our current lifestyle as well as our ability to easily commute and drive to the neighboring towns of Windsor, Johnstown, and Loveland. Carol Pernicka tracker@Ipbroadband. net 2 Case #USR 15-0027 For Public Record May 12, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP CFM Planner II Weld Count Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 970-353-6100 ext. 3524; Fax 970 304-6498 daungst @weldgov.com Weld County Commissioners: RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials (MMM) Highway 34 Development I am very much opposed to having a heavy industrial asphalt and aggregate plant near me due to the rock dust from the crushers and vapors from the asphalt processing. I have an acute respiratory problem and would be much worse with this kind of operation. I live in a rural residential area, in addition to agriculture and farming. Other residential areas are surrounding the proposed MMM site. I believe that there will be a high level of noise pollution due to the loading and unloading of rail cars and trucks. Also the alarms on the various pieces of equipment along with the loading and unloading will be a disturbance to the residences of the community. Because of the number of trucks and trains moving in the area this will cause significant traffic problems on US34, WCR 13, 15 and surrounding roads. Since this use is not typical to this area it will also cause added road repairs at taxpayers' expense immediately and into the future. This type of heavy industrial operation does not belong in a well-established residential community. It does not promote the safety, health and welfare of the inhabitants of this neighborhood. Sincerely, Lester R. Eastman 6731 Lakota Court Johnstown, Colorado 80534 EXHIBIT LRHLeastman@gmail.com 1 It C e"' Case # USR 15-0027 For Public Record May 12, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP CFM Planner II Weld Count Department of Planning Services 1555 N . 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 970-353-6100 ext . 3524; Fax 970 304-6498 daungst @weldgov. com Weld County Commissioners : RE : Planning Application USR 15-0027 : Martin Marietta Materials ( MMM ) Highway 34 Development I am strongly opposed to MMM Development. I have several concerns with regard to the purposed application mentioned above : ■ This development is a heavy industrial plant and not compatible with the surrounding residential homes and agriculture area . The impact it will create includes noise from trains, trucks, crushing of rocks, vibration from trains, an odiferous dusty environment, and a considerable traffic situation . ■ Noise : Arriving, unloading, departing of trains ( possibly 3, 117 car loads plus engines a day) . Arriving, loading, and departing of trucks ( 1, 129 vehicles and up to 2, 260 a day, mostly heavy 30 ton trucks ) . Also normal daily noises associated with a heavy industrial plant. Wheel noise and banging of cars from trains stopping and starting will be a constant irritation to residents . Trucks safety equipment beeping . EXHIBIT ' PS • Pollution : o Dust : What is planned for keeping the dust down from the crushing, unloading, loading? The winds are constant in this section of Weld County. As we all know water is a premium in our arid part of the country. Will the aquafers be depleted by the use of sprinkling the massive amounts of yielded rock being crushed and stored ? o Odor: MMM has stated that there are no adverse health effects to the community . I do not agree with this statement. Both I and a family member have breathing and heart conditions that would be affected by the dust and odor from the site. There are other "Senior Members" of this community that suffer these conditions. In closing I would like to state that this MMM Development will not provide a safe, healthy and aesthetically- pleasing environment that will adversely affect our community. Thank you for serving Weld County. Sincerely, Harriette I . Eastman 6731 Lakota Court Johnstown, Colorado 80534 LRHLeastman@gmail .com Diana Aungst From: Melvin Bickling [mbick7077@outlook.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2015 1 : 13 PM To: Diana Aungst Subject: Planning Application USR 15-0027 Attachments: 001 .JPG; 004.JPG; 009.JPG Case # USR15-0027 For Public Record Date: May 12th, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N . 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 EXHIBIT 970-353-6100 ext. 3524; Fax: 970-304-6498 daungst@weldgov.com Vs 0 't •.S_a Weld County Commissioners: RE : Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development For years I commuted past the Indianhead Estates subdivision and it was my wish that one day I could live there and enjoy the large lots, the peace and quiet and the great views of the Rocky Mountains. In 1997 my dreams and goals came true when I built a house on Lakota Court. Over the last 17 years I have enjoyed my dream home with the expansive back yard including a garden, large deck and a pond with a waterfall and the fabulous views of the Rocky Mountains. We are outdoor type of people and spend most of our time in the back yard located south of the house. The proposed site is southwest of our home. All of this is in jeopardy with the MMM proposal. The proposed Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development goes directly against the Weld County Agricultural Use Plan for this area . The proposed project is to be constructed adjacent to the Indianhead Subdivision where we reside. There several issues with the site selection by Martin Marietta : Noise, Increased train traffic, Increased truck traffic, Odor, Hours of operation, the obstructive view caused by the facility and the reduction of property values. Martin Marietta did have an Open House meeting January 2015 at the Best Western . It was very interesting 1 the theme of the meeting was "being a good neighbor" as per MMM 's view point? The staff took a defensive posture and were argumentative at the best when asked questions that they did not have a resolution . MMM posture was not one of being "a good neighbor" . * Noise: a. MMM did not have an answer about " line of sight noise" issue. All of Indianhead Estates East is elevated in relationship to the proposed MMM . Our house is located on the elevated portion of Indianhead Estates and from our second story, where the bedrooms are located, we have a direct line of sight to 90% of the proposed MMM site. The sound barrier would have to be 60 to 80 feet in height to partially block the line of sight noise from the proposed MMM site. We do not have air conditioning and our windows are always open during the summer to help cool our house. b. The application indicates that the operation could operate 7 days a week and 24 hours a day. This area is not an industrial zone but all of the MMM studies indicate that they will be within the industrial noise limits. The noise will go from 50 dBA residential to a peak of 78 dBA industrial and " might exceed that limit at times" according to the application . This could be increased by 1000 times to 85dBA on occasion. c. There is no information as to the noise dBA from the recycling of the concrete and asphalt? d. MMM did not provide a base-line reading for the dBA for the existing Indianhead subdivision . MMM keeps referring to the maximum levels allowed . e. It appears that it will take approximately 20 hours to unload the train either by hopper or by top unloading. This would be twenty hours of continuous noise from the locomotive, rail cars banging, vibration unloading noise, backup alarms, unloading excavator, ect. f. MMM 's noise study only includes the residences in Indianhead Estates West and no residences in Indianhead East. g. The noise indicators R1B and R1A are located behind a berm with no line of sight noise indicators. There are over 100 residences in the Indianhead Subdivision and MMM has chosen only two test stations on the west side of the subdivision . h . MMM did not include normal hours of operation especially the unloading of rail cars at night. i. MMM operation has located a total of 13 possible sites to construct the new facility. There are at least 3 other sites that are located along the railroad and have the same highway access as the County Road 13 site. * Increased Train Traffic: Anyone that drives on Highway 34 knows about the long traffic backups caused when the train is crossing the highway. MMM is proposing several trains per week with an average length of 117 cars which would equate to over one mile in length . At an average highway crossing speed of 5 MPH, it would take the train approximately 12 minutes to completely cross the highway including the gate approach time. It would back up the traffic at least 6 normal light cycles (80 seconds per cycle). This would just multiply the problem that currently exists with traffic backing up at the railroad crossings. Typically, there are accidents caused by the sudden stopping traffic. The traffic can back up a mile or more in each direction during the train crossing time. * Increased Truck Traffic: For the first two years there will be an extreme increase in traffic hauling aggregate and aggregate support materials into and out of the MMM proposed location . There will be extreme wear and tear on County Road 13. Currently there is not a stop light at the highway 34 and County Road 13 intersection. The study indicates that 55% of the truck traffic will enter highway 34 going to the east and 45% will make a left turn to the west. The traffic study was completed in February of 2015. The traffic increases substantially during the summer months with the Colorado tourist attractions and summer vacations when the schools are closed for the summer. This just happens to be the same time when MMM has the increased road usage compounding the situation . A new stoplight would slow down Highway 34 traffic and cause further traffic delays. 2 *Odor: The odor will directly affect all outside living and enjoyment by the residences of the Indianhead subdivision. In the mornings there will trucks warming up and the locomotives that will be idling between moving the cars. The asphalt plant will emit odors. The prevailing winds are from the northwest and southwest and would blow the fumes directly at the Indianhead subdivision at least 50% of the time. *Obstructive View: MMM in the application minimizes the operation in the photos as if was located miles away from the Indianhead subdivision . The MMM will be a detrimental distraction to the beautiful views of the Rocky Mountains. Attached are the photos of a MMM facility and it demonstrates how the facility on County Road 13 will really look like. * Reduction of property values: MMM does not address the issue of the line of sight noise that would lower the real estate values especially in Indianhead Estates East. They have not even considered the impact to Indianhead Estates East since it is elevated . There are over 100 properties in the Indianhead Estates subdivision that are directly affected by the MMM proposal. It is clear that the properties surrounding the facility will be less desirable and the value of the property is compromised. In conclusion, MMM has focused the primary studies to property that are immediately adjacent to the proposed site. There are several issues as listed above that have not even been considered by MMM . Indianhead Estates East has 77 family lots and the majority will have line of sight noise issues. 6MMM has not even considered the elevated portion of Indianhead Estates. MMM is not being "the good Neighbor" as they indicate. Thank you in advance for your review of the MMM proposal . This proposal is not a good fit for our community. If you have any questions, please contact me mbick7077@outlook.com or 970-227-8420. Mel Bickling 6690 Lakota Ct. 3 } i • • _ w • r.,. •• rte:* . _ ms` s 1. r V � • L. _ I _-4.. it•,... 7 .._ . ....„,. ._ , . , i . ... .ilk- rtfigtell. .tg[4:_ ,I,r14 '-ir-- - mormo S . '_ '""'"... .—-_ .,'nlirt'c'..'"*."":•r. _ _ --A. . -_--..► — 1• IL-- i .. ' O4.P, . "r � Tt rgla '� -- -rte4.1 f--'rcrr.,, .r • • al wit10 T. 0.• -fit.,.i �� b . _ - 0.f • • • • •Ili it • • • .�t�1 sw,- ` l �w: ` S R ECEIVEN 6 } 1 i 1 c'7 12 / 5 ej)ea--sr- MAY 13 2015 ,), t LIC 'Meld County Planning uepdrtment GREELEY OFFICE fra —tot7 Cr Ckit3-10-t-ef /A7\1\ 1 ), C VY1 Ce-A---4/L-A---1 AkilLee( . ---ig_e_ PLI)0 il ) 0,6L-ej /i/a4k,“../ -2)? et4-A-e----etc---- 41 , P / Werje-- 3dam" C-tF',�- V leZA"-±- CD r_ e� C " 0 a- a 1724-4 rill �''"- -it Ain° VA., etr-t7- 1....44 CA-e-ete'll-aa--) e..-,n---J;ir id sou,,,,/ , --4-yfr-c-1 , ceetrejt-6 9") 111 3 it ( D: _i, ta,rn- ha__) 1,t_ertA_ ______ ____________________:44-6-z---c-) 0/ fya__ )40,/vcc-s-d-ite- • 9 At-- eke fr ' 1 ZA/44-4 --) 1 f,_c_-_. /yLets—t--O--e---7 e cr-itioct-ervi-- 1 c , c ) co___Q___ (AAA, ( x / ci ? ) jraw(1-c) -- 161-1241.A. A_A-L— e `j -'- D_60 L_,,,, / ✓� L � �J ., �.��-mot. - ,--- ', 1 A.,, ,c___„ (ivy / -1 v\A-5 2-1:3 tliecal-- LAj 1 - ---_-----.— -----______ _-) TL k n 5 6 ____---- ----Tez . it„t_ ' ti_ e_c __cc ,) angfk-v-ii #4 - teLvos ).A , ss,.:„ .K. ce_A__ 14-a, ) 47fati..t.c. A /d- Atit° lif Ms. Gertrude Holtslag EXHIBIT 27293 I lopi Trl 1A 1 Loveland • : 1 C. to ►• RECEIVED Case # USR 15-0027 MAY 13 2015 For Public Record weld County Planning Department GREELEY OFFICE May 11 ,2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst,AICP,CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 Weld County Commissioners: RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027; Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development We are strongly opposed to the Martin Marietta Highway 34 Development and cannot stress enough the incompatibility of this development with the surrounding agriculture and residential use. I do not understand how and a heavy industrial plant can be sited next door to a residential neighborhood and be said to be compatible with existing surrounding land uses. The first point is about the amount of traffic that will be generated by this development. This will make the Highway 34 traffic unmanageable. At present this traffic is heavy so that waits of 5 to 10 minutes just to proceed onto highway 34 east or west are all to common. Add a thousand to two thousand trips with heavy trucks and it presents a nightmarish situation for residents and all persons who use Highway 34 daily as their commuter route. Increasing the train traffic will make the noise from train movements, car switching, car wheels, engines running, whistles, horns will make the residential area an undesirable place to live. The development is within Johnstown Growth Management Area. Johnstown's City Council has already stated that this Development does not fit their vision for the area. Martin Marietta admits that there will be odors. They say they have odor rangers. Will this do any good other than tell them that they have odors? As a person who sleeps with window open at night this will not be a pleasant experience to smell asphalt in our bedroom. Plus the noise of night production would EXHIBIT .C to. - \almost preclude the ability of sleeping with windows open for fresh air. Need more details on dust suppression. Need specific plan for all types of products that will be generated as material is brought into or out of facility. Who will want to buy our homes with a heavy industrial plant in our back yard.Example Two weeks ago a man stopped out in front of our home and wanted to talk to me. He was moving here from Houston Texas and had made an offer on a home in the development. The real estate person had not mentioned the plant. But in doing research on the house learned of the plant. He wanted to know what 1 knew about it. He stated that he might back out of the purchase if the plant was approved as he was not told about it. HOW MANY PEOPLE WILL BUY A HOME IN THE FUTURE WITH THIS PLANT NEXT DOOR. This our investment. What happens to our investment? In closing this development is without a doubt not compatible with the surrounding residential, agricultural land use . G, f Carl osack Case # USR 15-0027 For Public Record May 7, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana August, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado, 80601 970-353-6100 ext. 3524; fax: 970-304-6498 Weld County Commissioners: RE: Planning application USR 15-0027 : Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 development I live in Indianhead Estates subdivision adjacent to the proposed site for this development project. I have numerous concerns and questions about traffic, congestion, train traffic, air and noise pollution our community, and lighting. • The traffic on highway 34 has grown to a near gridlock during certain hours of the day. Trying to enter 34 from one of the county roads safely can be a monumental task at times. It concerns me that with an additional 1100 vehicle trips dumped onto that highway daily will make that virtually impossible to merge into the traffic safely. This will also cause much more wear and tear on the roads. Is Martin Marietta going to pay for this additional upkeep or the taxpayer? • How many trains will deliver aggregate weekly? How long will these trains be? This will add to the highway 34 congestion severely. What hours of the day will these trains be operating. Trains are very loud with horns blowing at every intersection, cars banging together as they speed up and then slow down. This can be very disruptive to our entire neighborhood for sleeping and for normal day to day activities. • The smell of an asphalt batch plant will not kill you but how do you know. It's difficult for outdoor activities in the backyard with undesirable orders. Simply complying with standards is not good enough to move into a residential neighborhood . I am asthmatic, but we moved here 32 years ago to be removed from the smells to irritate my asthma . • I would like to know how as Martin Marietta directly states they would benefit the agricultural area in this community. I did not know farmers used a lot of asphalt in their businesses. Martin Marietta claims to want to be a part of the community. Why do they think a heavy industrial business fits in a residential area? They want to move into a site that is surrounded by residential housing. Once they move in, there are other heavy industries will potentially move in . It will open the door for others that would be hostile to residential areas. • If they are going to work at night, what type of lighting will they use? If this happens we won't even be able to open our windows at night due to noise, odor and glaring lights. Our view of the mountains is pristine, that is one thing that attracted us to Indianhead many years ago. EXHIBIT Mt MM claims they won't block our view, But how pretty can the mountains be, with a batch plant setting down below the view. I have thought about driving east on 34 and the first thing you will see as you enter Weld county will be train cars and asphalt batch plant. "Pretty/ huh"? I want to thank you for reading my opinions and concerns. Kent Sullivan kents@lpbroadband.net 27397 Hopi Trail Johnstown, CO 80534 Diana Aungst From: Olga Wallace [olgawallace43@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2015 12:23 AM To: Diana Aungst Subject: case # USR 15-0027 Case # USR 15-0027 For Public Record Date: May 13, 2015 Weld County Commissioners: c/o Diana Aungst, AICP,CPM Planner II RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027;Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development I am writing this letter to beg you not to let Martin Marietta Materials build the asphalt plant so close to our neighborhood. This will effect us and everyone close-by. Our health, our homes and our view of the green fields and beautiful mountains will never be the same. The noise, the smell, the lights, the traffic and dust will be too much to stand. This will effect us deeply. We live here because it is very quite and pretty with a wonderful view of the mountains and wildlife like foxes, coyotes, pelicans, falcons, owls and all kinds of birds. This company says that everything will be Okay but they will say anything to get their way and make their money. I cannot drive well enough to travel on Highway 34. I now drive by county roads to shopping centers and I am afraid of the congestion with the Martin Marietta trucks and of the road deterioration that they will cause. I would be trapped at home if Martin Marietta builds this plant. Please in God's name help us. Respectfully, Olga Wallace EXHIBIT 1 I _a_k_ .t att - Diana Ajst From: Joyce Johnson [joey81853@msn.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2015 6: 39 PM To: Diana Aungst Subject: Planning Application USR 15-0027 Case # USR 15-0027 For Public Record 5-13-15 Weld County Commissioners C/O Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N . 17th Avenue EXHIBIT Greeley, Colorado 80631 1 a5 97O-353-61OO ext 3524; Fax: 97O-3O4-6498 daugnst@weldgov.com C a` " RE: Planning Application USR 15-OO27: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development I would like to state my opposition to the proposed MMM Highway 34 project. I have lived in Indian Head Estates for well over 30 years. I find this project to be a complete cross purpose to the reason that Indian Head Estates was chosen as our home. My husband and I raised our children here away from the hassles and noise of inner city or industrial life. As we both grew up in the Denver area we were very familiar with that type of environment. My husband has since passed away, but I feel as passionate about this area as he did . My concerns are that the noise and increased traffic from the trains and trucks will cause noise, dust and extensive damage to our roads and our living environment. Highway 34 traffic already backs up with the wind generator blades that are moved from the Vestas Facility. This will only add to the frustration of drivers just wanting to get home from a long day at work. The winter months being even more dangerous with slick roads and impatient drivers. I can not see where the amount of train and truck traffic has been fully addressed. How many trains, how many trucks? How long are they idling as they are switching cars, how many whistles, horns and screeching wheels in a day? I have one of the older homes in Indian Head and it is all electric. That means there is no duct work for forced air heat or air conditioning. Sleeping with the windows open in the summer time is a must. How will this impact my comfort? Noise is a huge factor along with the smell of the asphalt. I work full time and do not have a lot of leisurely down time. I look forward to those nights and days that I can sit out on my patio and just enjoy what my late husband and I worked so hard for. It breaks my heart to think that this could actually become an industrialized area . The lighting alone would disrupt. It must be dark skies compliant ! It is beautiful here with the diverse wildlife, foxes, raptors. birds or all kinds, etc. This area is the gateway to the Rocky Mountains. Do we want visitors from all over bypassing the area because it is industrial 1 and incompatible with this beautiful area? I think the long range goal has always been to keep our visitors in the area as long as possible before they head up and over the mountains. If this plant had been built and was operational at the time most of the people in Indian Head Estates and the surrounding communities chose to buy or build their home, I feel certain most would have chosen elsewhere. Sincerely, Joyce Johnson joey81853@msn .com 2 Diana Aungst From: PETE STRAUB fpetestraub@msn.com] Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2015 3:55 PM To: Diana Aungst Subject: RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development Attachments: View to proposad MMM site.png Case # USR 15-0027 For Public Record Date: May 14th, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N . 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 Weld County Commissioners: I am a resident of Indianhead Estates who's property will back up to the Martin Marietta Materials (MMM ) plant. Although impacts to our family will be ongoing and ever-lasting and could fill a book, including 24/7 visual, odor, noise, health & loss of lifestyle concerns, (Please see the attached photo taken last evening from our deck that demonstrates this tranquility), what I want you to consider is how the potential placement of this facility will affect the overall Northern Colorado community, especially Greeley commuters. An observation of US-34 traffic, especially at peak commuting hours, will demonstrate that without question . Anyone that travels US-34 during peak morning or evening hours, or any weekend, knows that traffic stoppage is already backed up to far east of Centera to nearly the Weld County line and beyond. (the MMM traffic study was completed one day in Mid-January, hardly a peak traffic use period that summer traffic sees). According to MMM's own traffic study, 185 vehicles/hour ( 107 large heavy trucks), in the (for year 2017), growing to 320 vehicles/hour, (227 of them being large heavy trucks) predicted for year 2035 will be added because of vehicle flow associated with this site just in the morning peak because of this proposed plant to the traffic flow. Afternoon peaks have similar impact. Just consider how slow a truck accelerates/de-accelerates and how that is going to impact an already bulging vehicle flow count. More accidents, increased commute time and generally a lower quality of life for these stakeholders just due to the improper siting of this facility. MMM's proposal is counting on CDOT for future widening of US 34 to six lanes and install an interchange (presumably with overpass and acceleration lanes) to US-34 and WCR 13. With the difficulty for the State of Colorado and DOT to obtain funding for al-25 sixth lane improvement project from Longmont to Wellington — how soon would a potential widening and related highway improvements occur on US 24? Decades away I propose. In the interim, snarled US-34 traffic, 402 traffic, and the inability to cross lanes at WCR 13 and our entrance at WCR 15 will be the new reality, not only for Indianhead and near-area residents — but Greeley and Loveland residents too. Additionally, other area Weld County roads will suffer deterioriation due to the heavy truck traffic on nearby roads. The important thing here is MMM has viable alternatives elsewhere in Weld County, and if an alternative is chosen Weld County will still benefit from any economic development & jobs created by new plant capacity. Moreover, sixty of these asphalt facilities already exist in Colorado, with many in the immediate Northern Colorado area. EXHIBIT 1 On a personal level, we will lose our wonderful lifestyle in the enjoyment of our deck and yard just due to noise of their operation and that of clanking, uncoupling railcars at all hours. (We all experienced the noise of a rail train as it first starts from a dead stop, or stops abrubtly. ) MMM touts berms to reduce noise, however, my experience in my occupation tells me that due to elevation differences between this proposed site, which sits low, and our home will cause the noise to easily skip over any berm. We know these properties will be developed eventually, so we are absolutely not NIMBY's or against any and all development, however, we are asking that Weld County considers responsible, compatible development such as agricultural business, residential, recreational, retail, or light commercial that is more in character to the area and to long range planning. Compatiblity is key for us, to Indianhead Estates, and to everyone in the area. The MMM Asphalt/Concrete facility is not compatible. Thank you . Sincerely M .P. Pete Straub 27793 Hopi Trail Loveland, (Weld County) CO 80534 303-330-6353 =petestraub@msn .com 2 Case # USR 15-0027 For Public Record Date: 5-15-15 Weld County Commissioners do Diana Aungst, MCP , CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 970-353-6100 ext 3524; Fax: 970-304-6498 daungst@weldgov_com Weld County Commissioners: RE : Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development I am writing to convey my strong objection to Martin Marietta Material's proposal for a USR in order to build an asphalt plant near US 34 and WCR 13. The heavy industrial use of that land is not in character with the area and not compatible with any zoning and comprehensive plans (see the attached Northern Front Range Metropolitan Planning Organization composite map, which summarizes these plans.). The truck traffic to and from the plant will strain current roads with frequent heavy truck use, not only increasing traffic congestion and making driving on US 34 at peak hour times more treacherous but also increasing maintenance costs for country roads. And many aspects of the plant operations will negatively affect quality of life for my neighbors and me. After a long search, my husband and I bought a lot and built our age-in-place home in the Indianhead Estates neighborhood. We chose that location because we found true community there—people are very friendly, know each other, and watch out for each other. Neighbors often walk around the neighborhood, which is quiet and serene because there is little traffic, stopping to talk to each other. We haven't experienced community like this in previous neighborhoods, and we very much want to preserve it here. Many aspects of the proposed asphalt-cement-transloading operation (and the door it opens to more heavy industrial development around us) concern me, but I will highlight those that I think threaten my community most. • Noise. Constant noise from plant operations, especially if it keeps people awake at night, will clearly degrade the quality of life in our neighborhood, where currently it is usually very quiet and peaceful. The noise analysis presented in the proposal shows that the predicted noise levels are right at the limits for residential locations and will exceed them at some locations at night, even with the proposed mitigation strategies. As demonstrated already by the traffic noise from US 34, sound carries well in our area, and when wind conditions are unfavorable, I fear that the predictions presented in the proposal will prove to be far too optimistic. Moreover, it is not clear that the analysis includes all sources of noise (for example, screeching wheel noise from the curved track, and banging and clanking of rail cars as they proceed one by one through the unloading). • Odor. Even more than increased noise, asphalt odor will degrade our quality of life; it will likely keep people in the neighborhood indoors with their windows closed, rather than outside interacting with each other. We built a house with a large front porch and enjoy sitting outside after work, EXHIBIT I .u•s._ . looking at the mountains and talking with any neighbors who walk by. Asphalt odor, even if it doesn't pose a health danger, will drive us inside and force us to keep our windows closed. Colorado is a beautiful place to be outdoors, but if odor and noise are imposed on us, it will be hard for me to appreciate that. • Traffic. The increased truck traffic will make an already challenging traffic situation untenable. Traffic on US 34 is already extremely heavy at peak hour times (beginning and end of the day). It sometimes takes me several minutes to turn right onto US 34 in the morning (there is only a very short acceleration lane to facilitate entry) and several minutes to turn left off of US 34 onto WCR 15 in the evening. In the short run, the USR application indicates that 78 trucks will be leaving the asphalt plant in an hour between 7 and 9 AM . That is one truck every 46 seconds. It is hard to imagine how all those trucks will be able to enter US 34 from WCR 13 at that rate, especially since three-quarters of them will be turning left. Unless some of them just pull out and make cars stop for them, increasing the chance of serious accidents, trucks will back up on WCR 13 and some will probably go to other local roads to reach US 34. For myself and neighbors who work or have other regular obligations that require us to drive at peak hour times, the added truck traffic wilt be another source of frustration and danger. With all due respect, we were here first and have a right to enjoy our property. We moved here believing that future development would be consistent with the current zoning and comprehensive plans that focus on light industry and residential uses along US 34. Looking at the new businesses being built nearer to Centerra, we expected that eventual development near us would be consistent with that. While the proposed asphalt plant location may be optimal for Martin Marietta Material's profit, it is not optimal for residents or for the many drivers traveling to and from work on US 34. Asphalt and cement are essential materials for construction and the health of the general economy, but this location is not the only feasible location for this activity. The proposal acknowledges that there is at least one alternative location under consideration where plant operations will not have such negative effects on neighbors and drivers, but will still supply needed construction materials and generate the tax revenues. I urge you to deny the proposed USR submitted by Martin Marietta Materials. Sincerely, Ellen Eliason Kisker 720-530-7784 eekisker@gmail.com Diana Aungst Subject: FW: Case # USR 15-0027 Citizen Concerns Attachments: 1869Home_After.jpg; 1869Home_Before.jpg; BackViewl .jpg; BackYardBerm1 .jpg; Canal.jpg; Field.jpg; FoxKits.jpg; FoxKits2.jpg; Heron.jpg; Lake View.jpg; Pelicans.jpg; Pelicans2.jpg; ViewNorth.jpg Case # USR 15-0027 For Public Record May 12, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 EXHIBIT 970-353-6100 ext 3524; Fax: 970-304-6498 daungst@weldgov.com Weld County Commissioners: RE: Planning Applications USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development My wife and I live on the south end of this proposed site. We have read the application in its entirety and have several concerns as it all seems very vague and tends to gloss over very important factors to how this proposed plant would affect not only our quality of life but all of our neighbors and friends in the area. 1 ) This house, although it remains in tact on the proposal after the plant is constructed, we fear would be in danger of being torn down. One line in this proposal states that it would remain in tact and another states that some of the outbuildings would be removed to make room for a berm. This house and farm date back to 1896 and we believe it has significant historical value to Weld County and the Johnstown area. If they follow through with their plans for this plant, there's really no reason for them to preserve it as it does nothing for their profitability. 2) Trains pass by here a few times a day, and although they are typically short (unlike the proposed 117 car lines that will go through if this site is developed), they are LOUD. I can only imagine the noise pollution this place will create. The train tracks are very close to our house (just off the front lawn). As trains stop (which they do daily), the noise from their wheels squealing and brakes grinding is extremely loud. The cars also knock together loudly as they jerk to start up again and stop. Even with our windows closed the volume is so loud that we have to pause our phone conversations until they fully pass before we can hear the other party on the line. If this application is approved, our neighbors and ourselves will be subject to an enormous increase in train traffic/noise/vibration/pollution. Commuting to and from work every day, we cross all of the railroad crossings along County Road 56 and Larimer County Road 1 up to Highway 34. The condition of these crossings has never been good, they have needed replacing for years and I can't imagine the damage that more trains with more cars and weight will do to them especially at more frequent passings. 3) This is agricultural farm land and has been so for a long time. I am also sure it has been and has the potential to produce very profitable crops. We have lived on this land for nearly 6 years and have watched the crops around us thrive every year. There have been soy beans, corn, wheat, and this year alfalfa that have all 1 thrived. I'm not quite sure who's providing the information that states that this land is unviable for agricultural use?? I grew up on a 1500 acre farm in southeastern Colorado. My whole family farms and have done so for generations. When they visit me they're actually jealous of the quality of the farmland that surrounds our home. My wife and I have been in contact with the land owner to buy the 2 acres we're currently renting from the owner for a few years now, along with the remaining land that lies from the back of our corral west to the railroad tracks. We would very much like to plant an orchard and cultivate the remaining land as a small sustainable farm to produce fresh food for our local communities. We wish to purchase the home and restore it to its original glory as well as the entire property including barn and outbuildings. This property would be a valuable asset to Weld County in its historical significance. The sale of this parcel is clearly all about the first big buck that makes an offer, and that is precisely what has happened. We have been applying for grants and have solid support from our neighbors in the local communities that they would love to help support and eventually buy our produce annually. 4) I am concerned with how this facility would affect the wildlife in Koenig Resevoir and surrounding farm land. An expert may come out to fill his quota on one day of the week and apparently see no waterfowl but that is simply not the truth. We take walks up and around that pond every evening at sunset and the variety of ducks, geese, loons, pelicans, herons, etc is astounding. I work from home and see 4 herons fly west every morning and then back to the pond every evening like clockwork. In the winter you can barely see the water there are so many geese in the water and nearby marsh. Drive up through Indian Head Estates and you'll see families of fox hopping around in the wheat fields and down in the canals hunting for rabbits. There is currently a family with kits just off the county road by the entrance to the neighborhood. These animals have been here before any of us ever came around, and they should stay here and be able to thrive without having their habitat ruined and water contaminated. 5) Water contamination is one of our biggest concerns. Martin Marietti says they have all of these safety precautions into place to avoid dust pollution, noise pollution (not sure how they think a 10' berm is going to do any good when Indian Head Estates is up on a hill beside the proposed building site), etc. We've gotten a lot of rain the past few years in this area and it's situated on a hill. The run-off would flow directly down from this plant towards the resevoir, where we live as well as all our neighbors on County Road 56. I grew up near one of these plants and they promised the same things but short of placing a giant bubble over the plant, there's no way to guarantee that dust isn't going to land on my house, or my neighbors houses, or the reservoir. It's like a cattle yard, it just happens. That's why we need our elected officials be our voice and make wise decisions in this type of situation and say, "no this isn't the appropriate place to build this type of facility." 6) Light pollution is also a concern. This area is rural countryside and we all value the fact that we can walk out on our back porches at night and actually see the stars. No berm will protect any of us from the bright lights that will inevitably be shining at night around this proposed plant. 7) The view will be ruined. Everyone living to the east of this plant will no longer see a dramatic panorama of the majestic Rocky Mountains. They will see a dramatic panorama of the majestic Rocky Mountains with a belching dusty asphalt plant in the foreground. Picturesque eh? Not at all. As for us, apparently our back yard will be.... a berm. The negatives greatly outnumber the positives in this situation. We'll all for creating jobs but 50- 100 jobs just isn't enough to warrant the dangers to the hundreds of people nearby. The risk is just too great for the people living in this area and we all fear that if they're allowed to build this facility in this area, it will open the gate for similar types of facilities in the future. Short of a sewage treatment plant I can't imagine anything worse being constructed here. Everyone around here values the quality of life we have in this area, and this would shatter that. There are many many other viable locations for Martin Marietti to build where they can actually be "good neighbors". We know where we live and we have always known that the land (up by the highway at least) 2 would eventually be developed for housing or manufacturing. There is no reason the farmland that has been farmed for centuries can't continue to be profitable in the same way. If nothing else, please preserve this farmhouse. We ask you please deny this application to protect the quality of life of our family, and all the other families this would negatively affect. I ask, would you like this in your back yard? Because it would definitely be in mine. Thank You for Your Time, Brett Mills P.S. I hope that you're able to physically drive out and view the site as I believe once you see the proposed location in person (not just on paper), you will immediately understand where we're all coming from in our concerns. I've also attached relevant photos. Please let me know that you've received this. Thanks. 3 mw •-%..-.a ..e 4v.. r , IO ET BERM 10a I 1 ?� k i . tai - l ,�. \ i . blow loom apt.ps 10'bens fifty daft WordowaftOat iood and and building) •1 . • r/o' r ..... q-_._ e. i ls.' .t Ni i _ No. • •1.r 4 ,6Y t !. r ♦ I {f yrt,. :'.�.. 'I- • • .••, . !%«. ..\ ` a,• .t• ..lIc l. •.O..' ., ..r ,.` . . . '� ,yru i �` YY, . .. •. _le f• s Y 444, ! t r n l•.'"• r `t rf ♦ 34, PrOPo5 d 10 Vu' o E iv1 ci 11. F.,. . . : ` M• ,off; : .. ...)11".C... .. . - ' • ••. ./ ' . rat rt. • cu,rert Gcto:ti ' K itS;, . - ', '`'\! I f: i , . .. ; r • �. Dr' . f _ frXt 4:, 'b d0 n) �� .1.4a .— _ -_ - ..4. { f , • i.'. - • ti_ : •` MA41 � ie.• «Idrn'� rc;.ihl. K • iS96 fwm/10uu r �1/A .+� 1 ,, �` �/ fir+ ; r',4 ,,'. } I1 tit �.�y��/{]1[�y() ��(fY\/yf]r�[��'[y�� 1/e\y`�11 ��L�� r •1 � r ft�iW V'i Vim' WV /• '• ;•�'�`/Jtivj�1�'],{�a- / , ,' a ..� AT f TRH e' In 4 Fox (Ate near •roods- o Site • • J .., , j� :S. .Z.-0'r, ` or T+rte �+ ti f it 1 r• c __ . i 'a(! li li (I I 1 ' r ' e \ r� 1 • — _evil' 4idlir 3i-i:- ---... ' G` [a brad do r radian N tEys ales fV� f [ C:� Ko -ni0 - v0B� dG w ° tRIG mil a , _ a „fir • 4,` I- k ,_ .. - 4,4 al —_ -.we,. .. .�; t�44•,; • • {J•4, .•It' }v - , •T v i. AA ; — _ _ _ IT ..-w -.. -V. �•"� �aa,fir Try ..� � — mss_ 1/4.• 1F . ? . ' .a.,._ - ' - '___Or - . — 1 /its . - .. :.. • — ri �. . • --- • • itcai L '1 r. .‘ 49"9.•- \ Ia- _ ,s '� - Yl " rim iy 0' aoopoaad Spo kat SAO Ind t1s . k 27687 Hopi Trail Johnstown, CO 80524 6 May 2015 Weld County Commissioners and Weld County Planning Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Planners and Commissioners: I am a homeowner who will be severely impacted if Case USR15-0027 is approved, since my property lies within 500 feet of the rail spur proposed in the application. The industrial facility proposed for my "back yard" will have a substantial negative impact not only on myself and neighboring homeowners, however. It will have adverse consequences for Weld County as a whole. One of the most significant issues presented by this application is the impact on traffic in the region. The Martin Marietta Materials (MMM) industrial facility, if built, will lie south of US Route 34, between County Roads 13 and 15. MMM estimates that the site will generate 1120 truck movements per 24 hour day, or 47 movements per hour, initially. Given that activity is more likely to occur over a shorter daily period, this number will be substantially higher during the daytime. By 20235, activity is expected to reach 2260 movements per 24 hour day, or 94 movements per hour. In the traffic study submitted by MMM, all of this traffic is assumed to pass through the intersection of US 34 and CR 13. It acknowledges that traffic on US 34 is substantial, and major improvements are going to be required whether the MMM facility is built or not. These would normally included widening US 34 to 6 lanes and adding turn lanes. With the addition of the MMM facility, a stop light will be required at the US 34-CR 13 intersection, impeding traffic flow and defeating the purpose of the "normal" improvements. What the traffic study does not recognize, is that not all traffic will move through this intersection. Truck drivers will take what they perceive to be the fastest route to their destination. For southbound loads, this may mean traveling south on CR 13 to Route 402, then west to the 402-125 intersection. Or, they may choose to use WCR 56 to reach WCR 15 for eastbound trips on either US 34 or Route 402, depending upon traffic. The point is that traffic flow will be less predictable than assumed in the MMM traffic study. The trucks used for transporting asphalt may weigh in excess of 80,000 pounds when fully loaded. These loads will place a substantial burden on all roads and highways in the area, many of which are not designed to handle these loads on a routine basis. Weld County will be expected to pay for the increase maintenance costs that will result. The traffic study also does not recognize the increased traffic that is expected to result from other planned development in the area. A number of residential developments are planned or under construction. Near the intersection of 1-25 and US 34 a new Bass Pro Shop and Scheels Sporting Goods EXHIBIT store are planned, which will lead to traffic backups far east of the intersection. Already, accidents are common along US 34 due to intersecting traffic and traffic flow impediments. One of the most significant issues, however, is the impact of increased rail traffic on highway traffic. MMM says that 1 to 3 trains of approximately 117 cars per week will stop at the site. They will pull off onto a spur and be unloaded . To do this, trains will need to slow to 10 mph or less as they approach the site. A switch will need to be thrown to divert the train onto the spur. This requires that the train be brought to a full stop so that a crewmember can operate the switch, unless MMM provides this service. A stopped train needs to be backed up so as to create slack in the couplers, to allow the locomotives to gain momentum without a load. After this slack is created, the train can move forward. The net result is that a stopped train can remain that way for 5-10 minutes. A moving train will take about 8 minutes to clear an intersection while moving at 10 mph. When decelerating to, or accelerating from, a stop, this time will be much longer. Thus, each train crossing a highway can create a delay for perhaps 20 to 30 minutes. At an open house in January, MMM representatives told us that trains would only approach the USR site from the south, and not cross Route 34. I see no such assurances in the application. Even if this restriction were imposed, trains inbound from the south would block CR 56 and CR 15, which MMM has already acknowledged. To summarize, USR15-0027, if passed, will result in a substantial negative impact to traffic in this area. Heavy trucks will move over roads not designed for such loads, resulting in maintenance costs to the County. In the end, the congestion may well result in a negative impact to residential and commercial development, thus having a negative, rather than positive, impact on the County as a whole. Gary Oplinger 27687 Hopi Trl Johnstown, CO 80534 RErFIVED Case #USR 15-0027 MAY 15 2015 For Public Record Weld County 'r'l�i► i, �, vc Nd� �u��nC GREEEEY OFFICE May 11 , 2015 Weld County Commissioners C/O Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Ave. Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Diana Aungst, I am writing to let you know of some of my personal concerns about the Martin Marietta Hwy 34 development. Planning application USR 15-0027. Before I discuss those concerns I would like to thank-you for the work you (and your department) do to make Weld County a safe and pleasant place to live and work. I understand that your job is challenging and difficult especially since each of us want you to consider "my needs." The Martin Marietta Plant property would be approximately eighty feet from our property. We currently enjoy being outside in our yard enjoying the sights, sounds and fresh air of being in the open spaces of the county. I can sit and hear the owls call and the crickets chirp in the evenings. I wake up and hear the local cattle lowing and watch the pelicans swim and feed in the pond adjacent to our property. The things we enjoy about the location of our home are too numerous to list here. The proximity of the Martin Marietta Plant would create many changes for us; we would see a raised berm, tall smoke stacks and a train instead of open space. We would hear the sounds of trains, conveyor equipment and other machinery necessary to produce asphalt and cement. Our fresh air would be replaced by strong odors of asphalt being produced and dust from the offloading of gravel. I understand that none of these concerns are life threatening according to research. All of my concerns will change the life style we currently enjoy in rural Weld County. Sincerely, 4ttiA.c..cA) L &Le) EXHIBIT Patricia L Boegli ante_ diA 5 - v o a. 7 (22t1 ( e , g /5% 0.90„.4 atral fr? if ton'en-5- m/ D/te a aeinire, 6 to, e FriP. F (11 '1ED 1446// Coon 4 `iJyo � e et ,.,hn,7 stifles / 555 } irti� � �., �. MA`l 15 2015 � e��-z�� 8� � 3 V\'elu County riannWWt oupdI Liiieiii , GREELEY OFFICE Thug Cer it n t s Sl o rl &r-,S' . -%* it_ 6ki_< Wevirdiy � 111 O .-c- X f cep "-My Cana" ! aI , a s Gads -, re y Rees pi et pas , 4( tei craits,„ Qs, cfran, a eel ni ✓ l rev ,cri4 z e'a) a a�►-y,�-�,, 6114,e,e__ 4 tose--t-- lairect/ 1 a t'zcif ele1 ora,O2 ae- sett. can ci nit cer ziecia ots,ct_j al Ite A,Lpesee% Icy dea, 1Zr2 6 t ,s %' k- j t � r 4w y 3 ¢ ,.s -ue.a..rT 4 de- Gv,s Cc‘,.7 gaealif ottiv ,ire i;j: �l ( U.e.l .c� Lie_ ti" IttS "etaaas- Atea01---j •Catte.> , a0re-- CbZ aCICL. , C4, nos i% ' ES- r e:,.„ S r u, i z 1 taw / ea 9 ,tra„ Locstati rad-444) °Agate_ ,neert, ricat ctaan_ ttlev IX/ ch‘ S'Arivrf a n o e- ; ' el TL , ch.sioac,- lia'a- 06-4 7esk G n. T T> Z L' w ) ,.L f t s G,v°A , se`erte%, c`nry p ct'C Cyt�L' a? ta7 Ham , lbii A (ri is alb EXHIBIT „ c6o 551 31 Cverlaa 13 CA 544-- @ Y Ain , Caw) - --Too Diana Aunrst From: Linda Glover [Iindaglover@lpbroadband. net] Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2015 7:28 AM To: Diana Aungst Subject: Case # USR 15-0027 Case # USR 15-0027 For Public Record May 15, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services Weld County Commissioners : RE : Planning Application USR 15-0027 : Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development I have concerns about the proposed Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development that would be next to the residential area where I live . I have read their proposal and it is hard to imagine that they would be compatible neighbors to a residential area . My main concerns are : • the odors and dust created by an asphalt plant • the noise from the entire complex • the additional truck and train traffic that will affect Highway 34 congestion, not only for us, but for the many who travel on Highway 34 These are just a few of my concerns that I feel would greatly change our lifestyle in a negative way. We moved here to enjoy this beautiful rural setting where we garden, enjoy sitting on our deck, viewing the mountains and walking in the neighborhood . Thank you for taking our concerns into your consideration of this proposal . EXHIBIT 1 t.'C.s-t5>.1 Sincerely, Linda Glover lindagIover@Ipbroadband . net 2 Diana Aungst From: nansupp@aol.com Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2015 7:25 PM To: Diana Aungst Cc: Nancy Suppes Subject: Case #USR 15-0027 For Public Record May 14, 2015 Weld County Commissioners: RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development As an Indianhead Estates resident for 15 years, I am writing to state how strongly I am opposed to the Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development. This type of facility is not compatible with this neighborhood or the surrounding agricultural area. I am not against growth and understand the need for their product, but this facility would be detrimental on several fronts. I understand that the ingress and egress is on WCR 13, but these 1129 vehicle trips and eventually 2260 trips a day with the majority being heavy trucks will be entering either Hwy 34 on the north, or Hwy 402 on the south. Both of these highways are already heavily traveled without this increase of truck traffic each and every day. I am also very concerned about the train noise, car switching, screeching wheels, and train whistles affecting the quality of life in this area. The train traffic that already exists and crosses Hwy 34 and Hwy 402 backs up the normal flow of vehicles, sometimes for miles and several minutes each time. We are also very concerned about the truck noise, backup beeping, pollution, dust particles in the air, lighting and odor. Martin Marietta says "Sometimes odors from the heated materials may emanate from asphalt plants." They argue that it is not dangerous, however, our lifestyle will be affected because of these odors. Who wants to sit on their deck admiring the Rocky Mountains, barbecuing, and smelling an asphalt plant? What will become of the dark skies we are so accustomed to? This facility wants to operate 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. There will be no reprieve on any of these levels: noise, pollution, lights, trains, truck, odors, traffic, etc. Please take our concerns into your decision. . . .there must be another location in Weld County that will be more conducive to this type of industry and not next to a beautiful subdivision. Thank you for your time and consideration. Nancy Suppes NanSupp@aol.com EXHIBIT I so ._ 1 Diana Aungst se From: Rayandbetsey nail [rayandbetsey@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, May 15, 2015 9:07 AM To: Rayandbetsey nail; Diana Aungst Subject: Case # USR15-0027 Case # SR 15-0027 For Public Record May 15, 2015 Weld County Commissioners C/O Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II 155 N 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 970-353-6100 ext. 3524; Fax 970-304-6498 daungst@weldgov.com Weld County Commissioners: RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development COMPATIBILITY WITH NEIGHBORS: **Per MMM's "Site Selection Report" This property does not fit the criteria in their evaluation table as "few neighbors". Their own criterion was not met as it received a score of "0 = no". Our Concerns: ***In reality their "few neighbors" actually encompasses Indianhead Estates (approx. 73 homes), plus the populations of Kelim, Lakota Lakes, Coyote Ridge and residents on County Road 13, 15 and surrounding residents. ODOR ie; TAR STENCH: ** According to MMM's own report prepared by Dr. Scott Phillips "Sometimes odors from the heated materials may emanate from asphalt plants. Although they may be noticeable, these odors would not be at levels that would cause adverse health effects to either plant staff or the community." They therefore admit that there will be an odor. Our Concerns: ***Even though it is not a health concern, our close proximity will prevent all of us from enjoying the outdoors with our families and friends. Our children and grandchildren will no longer be able to play in their yards. Additionally it will prevent us from having our doors and windows open to enjoy fresh air. We do not have A/C and have no way of installing it. EXHIBIT 1 �►� I. A ***Having worked in construction for many years, I know that the tar stench will be present whenever they are making asphalt. That stench permeates everything so hanging clothes outside to dry, would be out of the question. Also if we had our vehicle windows open the interior would absorb this tar stench. VEHICLE TRAFFIC: * *MMM stated that. immediately 1 ,129 vehicle trips and eventually 2,260 trips a day with the majority being heavy trucks at peak times. Our Concerns: ***Right now at peak times to go west on Hwy 34 from WCR15, we have to wait for a break in traffic from the stop light at WCR 17. Currently this is a traffic hazard and we can only imagine how this hazard will increase. We do not know when the last traffic study was done by CDOT. TRAIN TRAFFIC **AECOM's Memorandum, dated March 26, 2015, Section 1 .2 Operations Overview: "The Highway 34 site is proposed to have four main components: an rail unloading facility to bring in raw material, an aggregate sales yard, asphalt plant and ready mix concrete plant. the rail loop will branch off the existing Union Pacific Railroad line to allow for the loading and unloading of aggregates. Trains will deliver aggregate from Wyoming approximately two to three times per week." Our Concerns: ***One has to consider that the two or three train trips per week that are for delivery, have to return and will increase the train trips to four to six trips per week. One would assume that these numbers would increase with increased business. ***As of now the current train traffic has caused backups on HWY 34 eastbound all the way to Larimer Pkwy. and westbound all the way to WCR 17. With increased train traffic these backups can only get worse. NOISE POLLUTION: **AECOM Memorandum, dated March 27, 2015, Table3 listed 9 of the closest noise-sensitive receptors. Per the memorandum "Other noise sensitive receptors exist in the area, but those listed n Table 3 represent the closest in each direction, so it is reasonably assumed that project-related sound levels at other, more distant locations would be lower than those presented in this report." Our Concerns: *** Discussions with local realtors has confirmed that we are currently in an upward swing in real estate sales. There is already an addition to the Hopi Trail homes that should be included in Table 3 with the potential for more. ***The assumption that project-related sound levels at other, more distant locations would be lower than those presented in this report. The question is what is lower because only a few dba(s) won't make a difference to the noise pollution. LIGHT POLLUTION: 2 **Weld County code requires "All sources of light will be shielded so that light rays will not shine directly onto adjacent properties where such would cause a nuisance or interfere with the use on the adjacent properties." Our Concern: ***Question: Will these light fixtures be dark skies compliant lights to reduce light pollution? FINAL THOUGHTS: We only touched on major items with our additional concerns & thoughts being as follows: *** There is little need for the use of MMM's products in this agricultural community ***Community as MMM seems to believe is the whole northern front range if not the state. We are concerned about the immediate area in close proximity of this plant ***Last but not least we did not touch on the visual impact that this will have on those in close proximity to this plant. We purchased our home July 2014 based on the rural setting and location. We would have not even considered this property if we had known of this project. Please take the time to drive through Indianhead Estates so you can get see why we are so proud of our neighborhood. Ray and Betsey Nail Indianhead Estates rayandbetsey@gmail.com 3 Diana Aungst From: nansupp@aol.com Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2015 2:22 PM To: Diana Aungst Cc: Nancy Suppes Subject: Ed Suppes comments on Case #USR 15-0027 For Public Record May 15, 2015 Weld County Commissioners: RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development I am voicing my concerns for the proposed MMM plant that is in my area. I am strongly opposed to this operation based on the following: Lighting -- Our community is dark at night -- not even street lighting in the subdivision. We enjoy sitting outside on our deck watching the stars on clear nights. With this plant, there would be bright lights every night that would have to be high enough for the work that goes on at a plant. Lights high enough to see the conveyors and on the machines that load trucks and trains. Outside lights from trucks and the train engine. These would all affect our lifestyle that we have come to enjoy in our backyard and on our deck -- that is higher than any proposed berms would conceal. It would take berms 300 feet in height to block the view of this project from our home. Noise -- There would be noise from trains unhooking, and hooking up which causes banging sounds and the wheel noise from the trains screeching. The beeping from trucks backing up at all hours of the day and night. Conveyors that run and haul the asphalt, gravel and dirt. Traffic -- Increased traffic on Hwy 34, WCR, 15 and 13 and Hwy 402 to the south will be affected. It is difficult now and even dangerous because of the volume of vehicles at all times to get on Hwy 34 from WCR 13 . At times it will take 2 to 3 minutes just to get to the median and again wait additional time for traffic to ease up in order to allow access to go west from this intersection. In addition to the vehicle volume, the trains that cross Hwy 34, WCR 13, WCR 15 and Hwy 402, back up traffic for several minutes. These trains are up to 100 or so cars long, and cause back up for 2 to 3 miles on Hwy 34 multiple times each week. More train traffic for the MMM facility is only going to add delays and noise to this area. There was an article in the Ft. Collins Coloradoan, March 5 2015 newspaper regarding the MMM asphalt plant and how the plant will be operated in regards to the emissions and traffic concerns. Quoting: " Fort Collins will require trucks involved with city projects to travel north of the plant on Taft Hill Road. The changes are in response to concerns raised by neighbors of the plant." To see the agreement, visit Coloradoan.com. Roads -- Who will maintain these roads from all the 500 or so heavy trucks travelling each day? I hope we as taxpayers won't have to! This amount of traffic will only add to the deteriorating road conditions we presently have. EXHIBIT 1 1 .s t vw- r. _ Smell -- We like to enjoy our deck and patio for entertaining friends and families with barbecues, etc. Our lifestyle will change forever! Who wants to smell asphalt, fumes from the diesel trains and trucks? None of us! Our community is a very quiet neighborhood with young families as well as several retired people. These homes are in the range of $300K to 600+K in value. This plant would affect each and everyone of us, 24/7 forever. If you would like to see the view of this proposed plant from our property, please come to 6801 Commanche Ct., Johnstown, CO. I urge you to strongly look at our side and reject this proposed plant location. Thank you, Ed Suppes 970-396-0930 Nansupp@aol.com 2 Tom and Diane Lord 6820 Commanche Ct. Johnstown, Colorado 80534 Case #USR 15-0027 For Public Record May 16, 2015 Weld County Commissioners C/O Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80634 Dear Weld County Commissioners: We are writing this letter in order to voice our concerns regarding the Martin Marietta application for a special use permit to build a concrete and asphalt plant off of Highway 34, next to the west side of our neighborhood. Our family is opposed to the plan for a variety of reasons. Indian Head Estates has been an established neighborhood for 40 years and heavy industry, especially of this type is not compatible with our residential setting. After attending Martin Marietta's open house we are convinced that the risk of building MM Highway 34 project is not acceptable. The issues include adverse health effects, safety, quality of life, and the general welfare of the people living in the immediate area. In speaking with Martin Marietta's experts, they were not able to adequately answer our questions regarding their project. Building berms and vacuuming dust will not protect the people living here. If the project is allowed, we believe that any other sort of desirable commerce or investment will never happen in this area. We plan to attend the public hearing and speak to all the issues related to Martin Marietta and their plans at that time. We thank you for reading this, and we are looking forward to meeting with you in the near future. Sincerely. Thomas and Diane Lord EXHIBIT 1 30 to ts . ��*p ,. I I 'I 1 May 14, 2015 i RE: Case # USR 15-0027 For Public Record Weld County Board of County Commissioners C/o Diana Aungst, MCP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department Planning of Services 1555 North 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Board of County Commissioners, RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027; Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development I Please accept this as our strong and formal objection to the proposed Martin Marietta Materials (MMM) development south of Highway 34 and east of WCR 13. Our home is located in the Indian Head Estates subdivision located immediately adjacent to, and at a higher elevation of, this proposed site. The facility will negatively affect our quality of life as well as the public safety and well bOng of this area as outlined below. - Comparable to other MMM in northern CO, this facility will not be vi ually compatible to the surrounding area, nor based upon the appearance of other MMM sites, maintain the appearance and operational integrity necessary for area residents or future develop ent of residential, retail or office-type growth. - Public safety will be compromised on Highway 34 and connecting art rials due to the enormous increase of heavy truck traffic (1129 vehicle trips to 2260 vehicle trips! daily. Traffic congestion and stoppage on Highway 34 will greatly increase due to the multiple pit (117 cars) trains entering and leaving the facility daily. - Quality of life will be compromised and negatively affected due to the !proposed 24/7/365 operation and high level vehicle and train traffic, switching of cars at the facility, the manufacturing and recycling process of aggregates and asphalt at the t cility, and necessary lighting to accomplish these tasks, industrial air emissions, odor and f gitive dust emissions. This facility will not be compatible with the Weld County Code in the fol lowi S Sections and G.A. Goals, along with other specifics not mentioned in this letter. - Sec. 22-2-20 This project does nothing to support Weld County's agriculture. - Sec. 22-2-10 This project does not support any form of agricultural industry. - G.A. Goal 7/Policy 7.3 MMM should not be allowed to move the procerty from Ag Zoning to Heavy Industrial. - G.A. Goal 7/Policy 7.3 This proposal is not compatible with Johnstown's Comprehensive Plan. Not only are we in opposition of this proposal and the respective facility in our neighborhood, we disagree that the proposed location is compatible to the surrounding irea. Heavy industrial development in this location will detract and deter future residential, retail, office4 ype, and less intrusive developments from wanting to locate here. The potential for future generations to enjoy the quality of life we currently have in Indian Head Estates and the surrounding area will be negatively impacted if you should choose to ii EXHIBIT — • be I allow this USR Proposal to be approved. We located to this area be: use it was peaceful and desirable, as a pursuit of happiness, as declared in both The Declaration of independence and .our Constitution. We sleep with our windows open, with fresh air and the sounds of birds, not horns and rocks tumbling. There are more conducive sites and locations in other parts of Weld County that we understand were set up for industries such as the MMM facility. As a sustainable operation, Martin Marietta may want to amend the site on 35t Ave, north of Greeley, to handle all the projects mentioned in this proposal in order to prevent more land from being compromised. Thank you for your consideration of our request. Sincerely, ea-nag Donald and Alice Anderson 6897 Commanche Court Johnstown, CO 80534 970-613-1155 ander6@skybeam.com Request of Diana Aungst: Please respond to the receipt of this letter and its incorporation into the Public Record and the respective packets for the Board of County Commissioners. Case # USR 15-0027 For Public Record May 13, 2015 Weld County Commissioners do Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 970-353-6100 ext 3524: FAX: 970-304-6408 EXHIBIT daungst@weldgov.com Weld County Commissioners: - - S %%SW As. Re: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development I am strongly opposed to the Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development and it is incompatible with the surrounding agriculture and residential use because: • Truck traffic will heavily increase especially on Roads 15, 13,56,20 and 3 .There are already cement trucks on Road 13 from the plant on the corner of 402 and 13 to cross Highway 34. With additional traffic on the roads, this will create difficulty for the community to enter and exit on the roads. • Access to Highway 34 is difficult to cross mornings and evening into westbound lanes or cross to the north side of 13 with large trucks waiting to enter 13 and 34 from the Frontage Road. • The pollution caused by the asphalt plant, mixing cement, loading and unloading is another hazard for severe breathing problems for me, children and adults living close by. Additional trucks and cars cause dust and wheezing for us. • The muddiest part of the road is in front of my house. During rains, the trucks drive too fast causing ruts and wash boarding. Son-Haul is expecting to clog the roads with trucks creating additional dust. My granddaughter is asthmatic with the current traffic causing difficulty in breathing. • The need for Police and Emergency Vehicles must be considered since I am one of the elderly living in the area. Collisions, possible injuries, derailments and accidents in general are a few more items that need to be addressed. • Road 56 is unpaved, narrow and has two Railroad Crossings. It is very slick and muddy when it rains and more dangerous in the snow. With minimal snowfall last year, 6 cars slid off the road including the mailman. With heavy winds and snows, our road becomes blocked with drifting snow. • The idle of diesel engines — sometimes 3,4,5 or 6- to pull the 100+ box cars, wind turbines, lumber, wall board, coal,etc.,cause more noise and pollution. The amount of Oil Tanker have added a hazardous situation causing concern about derailment. • The south end of 13 was flooded and closed at 56 and 13 for several weeks during last season's downpour. Traffic was backed up on all roads leading to Highway 34 which was at a stand still. • The addition of a new gas pipe line on the north side of 56 with large storage tanks plus crude oil tanks on Roads 56 and 13 along with added heavy truck traffic is alarming and explosive. • Train traffic has increased day and night causing delays on all roads. Two to 3 times a week trains have stopped on the tracks as long as 15 to 20 minutes waiting for clearance to cross 34. • Vibration, coupling of trains, cars left on tracks when not in use leaves concerns for vagrants. • The train whistles are very loud and hurts our ears. My granddaughter who plays outside is hindered by the whistle and holds her ears. At night the whistles interrupt our sleep. We like to have the windows open at night. We have moderate breezes blowing through the house to circulate the air. The air blows North to South or West to East . • Driving at night trains are sometimes impossible to see or hear until it is too ate to stop and collisions have occurred. Lighting the area causes insect, birds and extra animal activity resulting in dangerous driving conditions. • Lighting, dark skies need compliant lights. • Little Thompson Water District — Heavy use of water will affect water pressure. The drought is fresh on our minds. Asphalt and cement can only deplete it rapidly. Conservation above all else. • Martin Marietta hasn't addressed the specific community. We are not Northern Colorado,etc. The community affected is the housing and farms surrounding us. I am not resistant to development. Housing similar to Indian Head Estates is compatible, not an asphalt and cement plant. Colorado is known for its superior air quality, beautiful mountains, outdoor activities, space and sunshine. Do not let our community suffer from additional pollution sources, odors and noise. Rosemary Sayre 6190 County Road 56, Johnstown, CO 80534 email: rosemarysayre@aol.com -2- Diana Aungst From: Linda Liggon [lindaliggon@gmail.comJ Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 10:21 AM To: Diana Aungst Subject: Case #USR 15-0027 Attachments: USR 15-0027.pdf Case #USR 15-0027 For Public Record May 19, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N . 17th Avenue EXHIBIT Greeley, CO 80631 daungst@weldgov.com 1 3C1 RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027 : Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development Weld County Commissioners : I have lived in the Indianhead Estates East subdivision for 28 years. I would like to take this opportunity to voice my strong opposition to the Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development proposal because it is completely incompatible with our area's long-standing residential and agricultural use. When my husband and I purchased our one-acre lot here 29 years ago, we made a conscious choice to select a rural area with a country atmosphere that would allow our family to spend lots of quality time outside. We proceeded to build our dream home over the next year. Our investment in this property feels especially personal because we designed the house, acted as general contractors and did some of the work ourselves. We sank everything we had financially into this home. Luckily we were able to pay our mortgage off early so that we would be able to continue our residence here when we retired . We have spent years landscaping our lot to maximize the outdoor use of the property. My husband spent 20 years designing and building a large five-level water feature to enhance our outdoor experience. Living here now as retirees, we spend more time at home than ever before, enjoying lots of time outside when the weather permits. I believe that everything we have worked for during our 28 years here would be threatened if the Martin Marietta proposal is approved . The Martin Marietta plant would be extremely detrimental to our lifestyle in Indianhead Estates. The proposed truck traffic in and out of the plant would grossly contribute to the already burgeoning traffic on Highway 34. Trains going frequently across Highway 34 would stop traffic for significant amounts of time, causing even more backups than we already have with the Centerra Shopping Center congestion . Even more problematic would be the ongoing noise and smell from the plant's 24/7 operation . We do not have air conditioning in our home. Due to the design of our house, we do not have the option of adding a central air system . We currently enjoy having our windows open during the spring, summer and fall months whenever possible. We would not have the luxury of closing our windows and switching on the AC when the noise and smell from the plant became offensive. I suffer from respiratory allergies. Whether the pollutant levels are 1 legally within limits or not is irrelevant to me. I suffer with various symptoms from even minor smoke and dust inhalation. The pollutants from this plant would most certainly contribute to my problems. Also, the beautiful view that we have enjoyed for so many years would be destroyed by the tall buildings, the piles of materials and the continual stream of trucks and trains entering and leaving the property. The visual impact of having something like this in our backyard is monumental. I strongly encourage you to come to our neighborhood, stand here and gaze out at the proposed development site. Imagine how this development would look and how it would influence your desire to live here. Our community stands to gain nothing from this project. The asphalt recycling plant proposal as well as the rezoning proposal (Case # CO215-0001) by Weld 34 LLC indicates to me that these businesses would like to industrialize our area because of the economic benefits to them . Considering that our indianhead East subdivision has been around for over three decades, it seems ridiculous that these organizations would come in now and use the adjoining properties for their own purposes when clearly this area has a very long- established history as residential . Industrial development in this area will clearly impact our lives in many negative ways. I beg you to vote no on this proposal and to any further industrialization in the area . Help us preserve the environmental integrity of this beautiful residential area of Weld County. Thank you for considering my comments. In addition to the body of this e-mail, I have also attached this same letter as a PDF file for your convenience. Please send a response to my e-mail address listed below to let me know that my message has been received . Sincerely, Linda L. Liggon 6900 Commanche Ct. Johnstown/ CO 80534 lindaiiggon@gmail.com 2 P FCE ! \if Fr) MAY 182015 Weld County Hamu�� utipdi uTrent GREELEY OFFICE To whom it may concern, I Rafael Garcia completely oppose to the MMM Highway 34 project, the amount of noise daytime and nighttime by heavy trucks, trains and more will affect the quality of life of my family and animals. The odor smells will also become an issue for my family. The impact from traffic, noise, light, water quality and more is the reason why I will not take any consideration into this project. I sold my house in Greeley two years ago and it took me a year to find the right country quiet and secluded place to continue to raise my family. With that being said I want to make it 100% clear that I' m completely opposed to this proposal. Best Regards, Rafael H Garcia 1253 N County line Johnstown Co 80534 970-690-4649 EXHIBIT nr ri l \ 179, \ ::p '777117 May 13, 2015 ,r MAY 18 Ztho vvt;l� Goo' RY GREELEY OFF= ICE Mr. and Mrs. Eugene Martinez 27877 Arikaree Rd Loveland, CO 80634 (Indian Head Estates) Weld County Commissioners Weld County Department of Planning Services 1551 N 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 To Whom It May Concern: We are writing this letter to inform you that we are strongly opposed to the Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development. It is incompatible with the surrounding agriculture and residential use because Highway 34 is already too congested now and it is already too dangerous to enter or exit the Highway. Also, the train traffic crossing Highway 34 would only add to the problem. There are too many frequent accidents at the present time as it is. This subdivision has some very expensive homes and many of us residents are afraid that the rezoning will substantially decrease the property values of our homes. Thank you for taking time to read our concerns. Please take this into serious consideration. Since sgly, teiftrni,i )0, P auaists.2.1 Eugene and Janet Martinez EXHIBIT Jim Piraino 27660 Hopi Trail Johnstown, CO 80534 970-300-1000 jirnp@Ipbroadband .net May 19, 2015 Case # USR 15-0027 For Public Record To: Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development Weld County Commissioners: Dear Commissioners: Thank you for taking the time to read this. I am a 10 year resident of Weld County. I chose to retire here and follow my children and grandchildren, all also residents of Weld County. After carefully considering a location that was close to hospitals, shopping, entertainment and all the other things needed in life I found the perfect spot, Indianhead Estates, located on the western edge of Weld County! It was and is perfect for me. I proceeded to build my dream home investing well over $500,000. After all, this was to be my last home and I wanted it perfect. I soon found Indianhead Estates to be more than a housing tract, more than your average neighborhood... simply put, it is a lifestyle... ! How many people can name each of their neighbors and their children? The neighborhood events are many but include an annual pig roast attended by 400+ people, pizza parties in my backyard where we cook as many as 20 pizzas in my hand built pizza oven... did I mention 3 outdoor weddings? Evening BBQ's and roasted marshmallows by the open fire pit... and much, much more ! Our neighborhood includes a myriad of professional people... 5 doctors, a helicopter pilot, graphic artist, retired government employees, teachers, business people and a host of retirees. As you read this I would assume you are in a quiet office with no interruptions... Imagine that same level of quietness all day everyday... that's our current noise level. I can hear the mailman coming from 2 blocks away and know which home he is delivering to by the unique sound of the mailbox door. Our stillness is only interrupted by an occasional train whistle as it approaches CR34 for crossing. EXHIBIT Commissioners May 19, 2015 Page 2 We have no sidewalks and no streetlights... the heaviest traffic on our streets in not vehicles... rather it's our neighbors walking their dogs, riding bikes or just out for a stroll (which usual means multiple stops to chat with other neighbors and perhaps a glass of wine). When the sun sets it gets dark, very dark. We like it that way. The only illumination comes from low level lighting of houses and driveways and the biggest source of overall light is the full moon ! Visitors to our neighborhood always remark on how fortunate we are and how they wish their neighborhood was like ours. Unfortunately our lifestyle is threatened by the proposed Martin Marietta Asphalt and Concrete processing plant. I am sure they will meet all the governmental requirements of noise and pollution controls, etc... they have to. However, it is in your hands to decide on compatibility with not only Indianhead Estates but the surrounding area, Coyote Ridge, Lakota Lakes and a wealth of individual homes on various size lots plus numerous ranches and farms_ How can a facility that is allowed 75db of continuous noise levels be compatible with a neighborhood that is virtually silent? 24 hours a day! ! ! How is a facility of 130+ plus acres operate with enough illumination to look like a football stadium compatible to a neighborhood that is basically in complete darkness at night? I believe the term is light pollution. I do not have the financial horsepower to challenge this project via the use of legal assistance. I must rely on you, my county officials, to protect me, my family and our rights. This project is a processing operation and not a mining operation . It is not dependent on raw material from its location. The raw material is to be brought in via rail. Therefore this project can be located anywhere and certainly in the vastness of Weld County there is a site that does not encroach on the lives of hundreds of people. Additionally, any economic benefits boasted by the applicant to the county will simply follow to the alternate location. The area of unincorporated Weld County on the western edge begins at CR 17 and ends at CR 13 (county line). This is an area much larger than this project encompasses. Certainly allowing this project would be the equivalent of the proverbial "trying to put the toothpaste back in the tube" . This would set precedent for the remaining area to allow heavy industry. In reality it is an opportunity to review the land use for this area. personally believe that the county has set a precedent 30 some years ago in the zoning allowance of Indianhead Estates as residential. To my point, today there has been a zoning change application filed for the property just to the north of the M3 USR. One only need to look a little farther west on CR 34 to see a much better vision of land use. Hospitals, shopping malls, offices, restaurants and houses! Are we to have another CR 85 corridor with its endless mixed Commissioners May 19, 2015 Page 3 land use? Highway 34 is the main east west corridor for the millions of people visiting RMNP. When they venture east to visit Greeley they will see an enormous change of landscape when the cross from Larimer County to Weld County... from well-planned land use to heavy industrial. Is that the vision we want? I have listed some specific concerns below: • Noise: My biggest concern is the noise from the proposed rail loop which would be closest to my residence. Weld County Noise Ordinance: • Sec. 14-9-10. Intent and applicability. • A. It is hereby declared to be the intent of the Board of County Commissioners to protect the citizens of the County from excessive, unreasonable and unnecessary noise. • Sec. 14-9-60 Exemptions • F. Any noise related to the operation of a railroad My concern here is simple yet extremely pertinent to the issue of compatibility. The rail road is a key component to Martin Marietta's facility. The application states the building of 7200' of a rail loop to hold 117 RR cars and 4 engines. Note that this track will be a "loop" and not straight. Any radius in a RR track aggravates "squeal noise". This is the noise created due to the straight axle design of RR wheels. When in a radius situation, the outer wheel will travel faster than the inner causing the inner to slip and squeal in a metal to metal grind. We have all heard it at some time or another. This will be that condition on steroids... yet allowable? Legally, perhaps. Compatible with the nearby housing? Impossible! ! The application sights the Greeley plant for noise benchmarks. Note that the Greeley facility does not have a RR loop. • Light Pollution: • What lighting and illumination mitigation can be applied to a 135 acre site that is back up to a neighborhood that is void of streetlights or any other normal residential illumination? I cannot imagine how this brightly illuminated site is compatible with a darkened neighborhood. • Site Selection: • I refer you to the Martin Mariette Material site selection process and in particular their " Table of Criteria" This table outlines a rating system of 0=no, 1=maybe and 2 =yes • There are 8 items of criteria. One of which simply states "Few Neighbors" • The selected site, 2, scored "0" on few neighbors. Meaning they are well aware of the juxtaposition to our neighborhood from the beginning. • Note that this problem of "Few Neighbors" has no more weight in the selection process than a "Signalized Light" or "Void of Track Obstructions". I interpret this as the lives of all the residents effected by this project to be of the same value as a "Signalized Light???? Clearly the "Few Neighbors" criteria should carry a much heavier score on this table... I suggest a -5 or -61 • Also note that the "Signalized Light" has a positive score of 1... yet it does not exist. As you gather information to make your decision I refer you to an excerpt from page 2 of the Weld County Planning Commissioner's Handbook... Commissioners May 19, 2015 Page 4 those who build on it. Experience has shown that without a plan tor development, problems are inadvertently designed into the physical setting that will affect how people live together in a particular community. Numerous reasons for planning can be cited: • To set County goals that reflect expressed desires and needs of citizens. • To exert a positive influence for channeling development into desirable, attractive and productive patterns. • To protect and enhance the environment. • To eliminate blight and avoid future blight. • To prepare the County for anticipated change. • To balance competing interests. • To establish ground rules. • To establish an understanding between elected officials, Planning Commission members and the wishes of citizens. I have confidence that if these reasons are followed my home, my lifestyle and my future in Weld County will protected from all the negative connotations of living next to what may well be the state's largest asphalt and concrete processing plant. Thank you for your time, Sincerely, Jim Piraino Diana Aungst From: Keith Sapp [Keith.Sapp@Thrivent.com] Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 2:34 PM To: Diana Aungst Subject: Case #USR 15-0027 for public record Case #USR 15-0027 For Public Record May 18, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 970-353-6100 ext 3524; Fax: 970-304-6498 daungst@weldgov.com Weld County Commissioners: RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development The recent request for public comment on the proposed development by Martin Marietta is well warranted and has raised several issues that I am concerned with given how close I work to the proposed development. Among my concerns are traffic, industrialization of the area, pollution, and odors. As a daily user of highway 34 the expected increase in truck traffic and train traffic will only further the congestion already experienced on the highway, particularly during peak drive times. This has the potential to increase the economic cost of commuting in the area, negatively impacting productivity for drivers, residents, and the surrounding businesses on a daily basis. Furthermore, the area has thus far been developed as mixed use, primarily offering retail and other service oriented office space for businesses that can naturally benefit from their proximity to residential neighborhoods. All of the developed industry is light industrial. By comparison, a heavy industrial plant does not add to the existing infrastructure and in fact will detract from it. The visual impairment to the area, along with the pollution and persistent odor will negatively impact everyone in the area . Who is going to account for these costs and how will they be measured? Given the amount of vacant industrial land in the area that sits in close proximity to both rail and highway access, there has to be a better location for this plant. Thank you for your time . Sincerely, Keith L Sapp, CFA, ChFC° , CLU®, FIC Securities Associate Rocky Mountain Region Thrivent Financial° 2956 Ginnala Drive, Suite 101, Loveland, CO 80537 EXHIBIT Office: 970-744-4629 Fax: 970-692-2623 1 43_ Diana Aungst From: Kim Pruett [kkpruett@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2015 6:39 PM To: Diana Aungst Subject: Case # USR 15-0027 Case # USR 15-0027 For Public Record May 17 ,2015 Kurt and Kim Pruett 25586 Weld County Road 13 Johnstown, CO 80534 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services Greeley, Colorado 80631 Weld County Commissioners: RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development My wife and I are strongly opposed to the Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development. We believe it will negatively effect the surrounding area, residentially and agriculturally. Another concern is the habitat in the area.. What drew us to the area was the beauty that surrounds us and the peace and quiet that most people seek when they move out of the city. County Road 13 will be inundated with huge trucking traffic and the noise that comes with them. Also, having grandchildren, it becomes a safety concern for us. Secondly, I hunt Koenig Reservoir lake that is right behind the proposed sight and it will effect the birds flight pattern over this lake. Lastly, we love the the quality of the air that we breath everyday and this plant could cause unpleasant odors. These issues will also make our property value decrease. Please consider using a sight that is more conducive for industrial use. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, Kurt and Kim Pruett kkpruett@gmail.com EXHIB 1 Diana Aungst From: Bette Feinauer [timnbette@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 8:48 AM To: Diana Aungst; Bette Feinauer Subject: Fwd: MMM Highway 34 Development! Forwarded message From: Bette Feinauer <timnbette@gmail.com> Date: Fri, May 15, 2015 at 3 :26 PM Subject: MMM Highway 34 Development! To: Bette Feinauer <timnbette@gmail.com> 26858 C.R. #13 Johnstown, CO 80534 Case #USR 15-0027 For Public Record May 15, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 Weld County Commissioners: RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development Being absolutely opposed to the Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development plan, I submit my objections, as well as questions, about this project as follows: 1 . the stated amount of traffic generated by Martin Marietta themselves will gridlock the W.C.R. #13 and Hwy 34 intersection as it is already dangerous to enter the existing traffic a. as necessary as traffic lights are, they could still gridlock traffic and back up trucks even more 2. we already have 24/7 train and truck traffic at W.C.R. #13 and C.R. 56 a. I personally timed the lights stopping traffic on Hwy 34 on May 8, 2015. EXHIBIT It took 11 minutes to resume travel for the traffic stopped by Great 1 4n i Western train - traffic was stopped as far as I could see east and west b. this is current reality, not including what Martin Marietta admits to increasing for traffic c. I also went to the Hwy 402 crossing on May 9, 2015, and the red lights stopped traffic for 6 minutes d. also a Union Pacific train carrying tank cars stopped traffic 8 minutes on Hwy 34 e. due to train whistles at three crossings near our home, we cannot carry on an 'uninterrupted conversation' until they pass by, and many nights we are awakened by both Union Pacific and Great Western train whistles f. train exhaust is also a concern and is visible in the enclosed pictures 3. to imagine a crew of Martin Marietta employees being trained and on site 24/7 for the purpose of splitting train cars anytime to allow road traffic through is highly unlikely 4. the number of farmers actually ordering asphalt cannot justify an asphalt plant in this area - it is at best incompatible under any circumstances 5. the statistics from other Martin Marietta plants cannot be used to justify this plant i.e. noise levels here are impossible to measure until this plant were in operation 6. many water fowl have already died in the holding ponds behind our home due to the oil well drilling and contamination of ponds; would yours be different? 7. there will be excessive truck 'engine brake' noise from trucks turning into Martin Marietta from W.C.R. #13 8. there will be excessive brake and rubber contamination from 'braking and turning' trucks entering and leaving Martin Marietta from W.C.R. # 13 9. Policy 7.2 states they will "minimize burdensome restrictions" - please explain why we should have any restrictions placed on us at all? 10. how will the contaminants/residue from empty trucks after hauling materials into Martin Marietta be contained and not run out onto W.C.R. #13 when leaving Martin Marietta? a. rain water and snow eventually wash these contaminants down hill toward the Big Thompson River 11 . there will be truck exhaust pollution especially headed north on W.C.R. #13 and Hwy 34 2 IN CLOSING I ASK OUR COMMISSIONERS TO VOTE "NO" ON THE MARTIN MARIETTA HIGHWAY 34 DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL. WE HAVE INVESTED A LOT IN OUR HOME OF 28 YEARS HERE ON W.C.R. #13 TO ENJOY RURAL WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, AND WOULD HOPE THAT WE CAN PRESERVE THIS FOR A LONG TIME YET. MAY IT NEVER BE TURNED INTO AN INDUSTRIAL COMMUNITY FOR THE BENEFIT OF A FEW. IT IS TOTALLY INCOMPATIBLE. Attached are pictures taken recently. Respectfully submitted, Tim Feinauer timnbette@gmail.com 3 Gmail - MMM Highway 34 Development! https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui ik=095878550b&view pt&s... RFcrVED GmiiMAY 21 2015 Bette Feinauer <timnbette@gmail.com> Et,( ,cK 11 We(d county I i.'li n; Department c ;,LLt OFFICE MMM Highway 34 Development! 1 message Bette Feinauer <timnbette@gmail_com> Fri, May 15, 2015 at 3:26 PM To: Bette Feinauer <timnbette@gmail.corn> 26858 C. R. #13 Johnstown, CO 80534 Case #USR 15-0027 For Public Record May 15, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 Weld County Commissioners: RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development Being absolutely opposed to the Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development plan, I submit my objections, as well as questions, about this project as follows: 1 . the stated amount of traffic generated by Martin Marietta themselves will gridlock the W.C.R. #13 and Hwy 34 intersection as it is already dangerous to enter the existing traffic a. as necessary as traffic lights are, they could still gridlock traffic and back up trucks even more 2. we already have 2417 train and truck traffic at W.C.R. #13 and C.R. 56 a. I personally timed the lights stopping traffic on Hwy 34 on May 8, 2015. It took 11 minutes to resume travel for the traffic stopped by Great Western train - traffic was stopped as far as I could see east and west b. this is current reality, not including what Martin Marietta admits to increasing for traffic c. I also went to the Hwy 402 crossing on May 9, 2015, and the red lights stopped traffic for 6 minutes 1 of 3 5/16/2015 11 :48 AM Gmail - MMM Highway 34 Development! https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=095878550b&view=pt&s... d. also a Union Pacific train carrying tank cars stopped traffic 8 minutes on Hwy 34 a due to train whistles at three crossings near our home, we cannot carry on an 'uninterrupted conversation' until they pass by, and many nights we are awakened by both Union Pacific and Great Western train whistles f. train exhaust is also a concern and is visible in the enclosed pictures 3. to imagine a crew of Martin Marietta employees being trained and on site 24/7 for the purpose of splitting train cars anytime to allow road traffic through is highly unlikely 4. the number of farmers actually ordering asphalt cannot justify an asphalt plant in this area - it is at best incompatible under any circumstances 5. the statistics from other Martin Marietta plants cannot be used to justify this plant i.e. noise levels here are impossible to measure until this plant were in operation 6. many water fowl have already died in the holding ponds behind our home due to the oil well drilling and contamination of ponds; would yours be different? 7. there will be excessive truck 'engine brake' noise from trucks turning into Martin Marietta from W.C.R. #13 8. there will be excessive brake and rubber contamination from 'braking and turning' trucks entering and leaving Martin Marietta from W C.R. #13 a Policy 7.2 states they will "minimize burdensome restrictions" - please explain why we should have any restrictions placed on us at all? 10. how will the contaminants/residue from empty trucks after hauling materials into Martin Marietta be contained and not run out onto W.C.R. #13 when leaving Martin Marietta? a. rain water and snow eventually wash these contaminants down hill toward the Big Thompson River 11 . there will be truck exhaust pollution especially headed north on W.C. R. #13 and Hwy 34 IN CLOSING I ASK OUR COMMISSIONERS TO VOTE "NO" ON THE MARTIN MARIETTA HIGHWAY 34 DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL. WE HAVE INVESTED A LOT IN OUR HOME OF 28 YEARS HERE ON W.C.R. #13 TO ENJOY RURAL WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, AND WOULD HOPE THAT WE CAN PRESERVE THIS FOR A LONG TIME YET. MAY IT NEVER BE TURNED INTO AN INDUSTRIAL COMMUNITY FOR THE BENEFIT OF A FEW. iT IS TOTALLY INCOMPATIBLE. Attached are pictures taken recentlyrm 2 of 3 5/16/2015 11 :48 AM � J a,c..... p,_4 , ,.. 4.4_,,,, ,, ,,,,e-- ice), , -g , ---1"-±e,./1 , I ,I 1 11 - - - R.ti Oil a,• • .II .K, . .. te I -- ♦ a - .! 1r '1 - J ' 1 ♦'. �' 1 11 rat u"r 14011 /• -•' rf�}i�ri . 't e y 4 ''' .-! ' J,.-", i.e..;y PL1.•.l •y''�1�lk, : i : i .: . ;(7..,..::Y . .1 i I. •� a J _. ,1,/j� • '.W�1., AR!0.(�N{ 1 I- ik •,'1 I I ' ►R t !• �( t iii � u .Ir 114~,•�yt . ♦'" u 1 �1� '/ 'r'AI - f 71 •1 .I rffr ;4, *;11'.)4�. CAI.' r. •_. .1 1 1 . 14 S N. S" 1.1 '1,l • .114.4 °' 1 A . i I.• ' a,- 4 • t& /a4 /�iLctaC ,,,t-- 'c r a/ . S , II sae I • w - s • rte „el) . ` ► 1 so, • . . I r► J .t i / ( 4_,,,,,,c(1.72,1 j—t G Cu ‘2Ave•erd-41•47.1 ii . wilb- II A. I ..itre÷pcpdtc,47e...e.e... Az-7 3 C✓Y: 4...e . it_ „.... , . ,I ,, f lel . D. l ♦ • ♦ - 7♦ t ,�+�� ' 1 . Li '�;w - { nn.rte' .014 n.J S`' ° ..* • • •t. y 1 1 } M� II v. . y ,;,.- .,fs : 1z Y1�, ,� s ''r —fir-- `` •r 1 ;• • tat Ilk L7 �-y-- alX1•4 L ' s11•4 L aite-•-144-11 �✓f' 1A- � , e , A9 • La 1-.4. r +:®• • - - Opt/c ?eit >4j4L 6-//71°.e.1 i... I T* •Williiii4.:f. —• ,. Sr%w l+riin !ct1 M ' Y4. .':• .tr.+k, . :rrty;t'r. _ yit - N ' . 1/4.4 _ 1• ' ' 4 , , « • f !. .•t 1 y• - _ i 1 '•- - i ,'• I • t • I I 1 7Clie. I et- 16/...deactic.... 644. -4/t4.s..eitc...., e.e.....,, Ciz. - /9 , T % A ';ii • 7 ' 11 .-.•. I• - . '. + tt r t a t - ..• .=jiL . , ,,_, . ...i. :, . .-..,_______.--.. ----- -••• - _.___ r___„_.„. , __ ,,,en 7 „,-.4.4.i.e,9.-ner- s _am"", --:le o Fp tt--- /47 ft F V IP , - • 71„,„el-leCared ,24 • . I r • 1 ► r * re e-04-1) ...1.4 c--) t ettlethi712 • ✓ •: • • s• � ?. I • Ir Al r Nif\ ......._ V,i(-1- /► A ... , • �, 0(•,.•0, i - 0 ' . 0 • • • a. • . . - • • _ „ • 4 • 1 . - - . •+ 011 - I, ,• ., iF 4 "L 1 , I ya -4 • - - 1 - 3- ' + ' • - • • - "-- 1 . ....... r _rap- - •-• :,.a .`•, 2‘1-14.z?,,t4 Le/ / c-- eic_-lif-L, - -- oest7 (Li ,_-. ! ti.__ i,e, /.3 Ii- /3/4 .1.c] . _ ...40 _.i, : 1, t ) I wit tli I / re ¢ if ' •'-a :ti'ti , .. ",F+ 4'a • te . .4' t 1 RRRccc rf ' , b 4,, ` r • •11 J • 1� $ C• ` J ,.1....„;t41. ' •).Y ' 1. l !. Div ! 4i . S/i • I>' ,( - n _.. ! a}j' y , 1i AU ){RSOt15 SPEC. ' r MUST Cita( W r _ � ;� AT OFFICE 10 • ,cAi ,. ,.'. .'. a yy�•. .i.: l4 f +a r ,i. . •ry1,,,,v , „ i,", ?ill• 41IlI% fl4 V �•,j r'i 4.' .% ,.• .J �. - ' • 1 )r. •I •• . ,',A.. . i. t. attrhett.J. ,_ ,e/trii. AZC P /th i1%) . . t./ . ' . he..X.:teOftati I L e.- ' r C' LCD tf v t c -4,�--vG. - iL� f _.v Diana Aungst From: Bette Feinauer [timnbette@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 8:50 AM To: Diana Aungst; Bette Feinauer Subject: Fwd: MMM Highway 34 Development! Forwarded message From: Bette Feinauer <timnbette@gmaii.com> Date: Sat, May 9, 2015 at 6:25 PM Subject: MMM Highway 34 Development! To: Bette Feinauer <timnbette@gmail.com> 26858 C.R. #13 Johnstown, CO 80534 Case #USR 15-0027 For Public Record May 12, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 Weld County Commissioners: RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development I respectfully submit to the Weld County Commissioners that I strongly oppose the Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development that is being proposed to you. We purchased our home on County Road 13 nearly twenty-eight years ago amidst farmland and country roads. The enclosed pictures might help you see the lifestyle we have enjoyed while raising our family through these years. These pictures will also reveal the proximity of the Gerrard Company property and the proposed site of Martin Marietta which extends all the way south to W.C.R. 56! It is beyond sad how industry of this nature will impact our lives here. EXHIBIT 1 We already have approximately fifteen cement trucks along with other traffic, including oil and fracking-related trucks traveling this road six days a week with the legal speed limit of 55 miles per hour by our home. Sundays are the only relatively quiet day. And we have train traffic daily and many times are waked at night by one or two trains passing through and blowing whistles at 3 roads within a short distance of our house. Trains during the day crossing C.R. 56, C.R. 13, and again C.R. 56 are loud enough that conversations on our gazebo are not possible until they pass. Due to the proposed MMM Highway 34 Development, we now have reason for great concern that the following potential changes will completely alter our lifestyle here and forever lose the peace and harmony of this pastoral neighborhood amidst choice Colorado farmland. Briefly, and certainly not all inclusive, are these concerns: 1. noise from the trains a. road blocks, especially in emergencies 2. noise from heavy industrial trucks 3. safety on the road 4. health concerns for ourselves and our family (one son and three grandchildren use asthmatic inhalers) 5. prevailing winds increasing noise pollution, air pollution, and odor over our home and throughout the neighborhood 6. sleep disruptions nightly 7. no longer able to enjoy outside setting along with activities i.e. gazebo fellowship, gardening simply relaxing in the fresh air and enjoying Colorado from our property Though this is a brief summary of my concerns, they are very real and verifiable. Our enclosed pictures should help. I ask that you please consider seriously what we are facing on Weld County Road 13 and reject the application of Martin Marietta Materials at this location. Thank you, Respectfully submitted, Bette Feinauer timnbette(&,gmail.com 2 Gmail - MMM Highway 34 Development! https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=095878550b&view=pt&s... REC '9vr1D GmMAY 21 2015 Bette Feinauer <timnbette@gmail.com> b, .t Weld County turning Department MMM Highway 34 Development! 1 message Bette Feinauer <timnbette@gmail.com> Sat, May 9, 2015 at 6:25 PM To: Bette Feinauer <timnbette@gmail.com> 26858 C. R. #13 Johnstown, CO 80534 Case #USR 15-0027 For Public Record May 12, 2015 Weld County Commissioners do Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 Weld County Commissioners: RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development I respectfully submit to the Weld County Commissioners that I strongly oppose the Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development that is being proposed to you. We purchased our home on County Road 13 nearly twenty-eight years ago amidst farmland and country roads. The enclosed pictures might help you see the lifestyle we have enjoyed while raising our family through these years. These pictures will also reveal the proximity of the Gerrard Company property and the proposed site of Martin Marietta which extends all the way south to W.C.R. 56! It is beyond sad how industry of this nature will impact our lives here. We already have approximately fifteen cement trucks along with other traffic, including oil and fracking-related trucks traveling this road six days a week with the legal speed limit of 55 miles per hour by our home. Sundays are the only relatively quiet day. And we have train traffic daily and many times are waked at night by one or two trains passing through and blowing whistles at 3 roads within a short distance of our house_ Trains during the day crossing C.R. 56, C.R. 13, and again C.R. 56 are loud enough that conversations on our gazebo are not possible until they pass. 1 of 2 5/16/2015 2:56 PM Gmail - MMM Highway 34 Development! https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=095878550b&view-pt&s... Due to the proposed MMM Highway 34 Development, we now have reason for great concern that the following potential changes will completely alter our lifestyle here and forever lose the peace and harmony of this pastoral neighborhood amidst choice Colorado farmland. Briefly, and certainly not all inclusive, are these concerns: I. noise from the trains a. road blocks, especially in emergencies 2. noise from heavy industrial trucks 3. safety on the road 4. health concerns for ourselves and our family (one son and three grandchildren use asthmatic inhalers) 5. prevailing winds increasing noise pollution, air pollution, and odor over our home and throughout the neighborhood 6. sleep disruptions nightly 7. no longer able to enjoy outside setting along with activities i.e. gazebo fellowship, gardening simply relaxing in the fresh air and enjoying Colorado from our property Though this is a brief summary of my concerns, they are very real and verifiable. Our enclosed pictures should help. I ask that you please consider seriously what we are facing on Weld County Road 13 and reject the application of Martin Marietta Materials at this location. Thank you, Respectfully submitted, Bette Feinauer timnbefte@gmail.com a@gmail.com cgtecirts\ 2 of 2 5/16/2015 2:56 PM ... , •• iz P, -i ‘- - --., • -- W � . y - . A.now- _ : 4 ;• + ;a go itli" 1"0-1-44-447 f.Se C6e--) 0-tic-4 1---•1.:1-"C-1, .."--541-ce-ce--r IV. - . ... — 'Kit( e. - •.) • JO . I •• , v. I , • \\•7 it II ".i..1 9 Ill .." 0 e : ei e 1 if 1 1 -. r j es, II • • •J,�- , , _ ..• •. — . - . r •. detatert..9 thes t A • • • _ - Wtaa it . aft. AMPEISIM 11( ji ,. - _ 4 F` - .�,. . \ �1M , i lit. 1. . 1 'N i I i Earl 4.41 it r , fr• i ti: ' p' 14: • ti."1/4._IliC it (.2.4) )•,1 -...13 \'`�; .• :, 1 ` �';� 4A-(.,•(.4 ,/; -P- G •i._yt.-1 1b et _ . ' rl< 4 • I-- . lw. Jr? - --- -L-7- - - ..A.----. ,' 1 CA--4/7A CY %- ..CILCtfa• 414- fas--- .__ __ IIIIMITAI- I r 4 AA' • I . . F` �. - -, .r nif •Y. . _ ;• - • t . - ager.. •1.(L.. _ �LlT. �... ..� r a . tj y - • y f • • L 1' 0 v • 1 • i ; :r ti �'>�roor , . , _ e. I. e - r`j �� . r )�.st.•••• ,. ��'cliCtilham`. r \ _ rr • r-- � IOlletC, .: . ::e'lit•telliiiiireogr._ , • i. LA Al '` ill Oirr. 7 .L...,, "If._,. 'r kik ' )4cmit,....v . ,. • r _�ri �� r X. . ( }� 4 Ili • v . . r -• ' ' f' .` SLR r , • .,` Alai. 1 I Ile la. �... 1 '‘', 1 1 tin . • i ••••i210 fLy Sri'r '11 'lSC[' . - - ` 1 r 4 _ .51 • 6. It iI II Case #USR 15-0027 For Public Record May 18, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027 - Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development Weld County Commissioners: As residents of Indianhead Estates West who have been fortunate to call this wonderful niche of northern Colorado home for almost ten years, we were saddened to hear of Martin Marietta Material's ( MMM) proposal to develop a new asphalt/ready mix production site with an associated rail spur and yard, within 150 yards of our front door. We are STRONGLY opposed to this proposal, as we feel it is incompatible with the existing surrounding agricultural and residential area and may impact negatively the "gateway" into Weld County from the west. Our families moved to Fort Collins in the early 1970's. We grew up and attended school in Fort Collins in the 1980's. Following graduation at Colorado State, we made the easy decision to set up lives for ourselves in west Loveland and now Johnstown. Our fondness for this region immense. Quite frankly it is alarming how quickly this northern Colorado area is expanding, but after living in NoCo for 45 years here, we get it, this is a great place to live ! As a practicing State of Colorado licensed landscape architect, I understand that "development happens" and we knew when we purchased our lot and commissioned a builder in the summer of 2004, that these adjacent agricultural properties would someday be developed We are not NIMBY's or against just "any" or "all" developments. We just want responsible, compatible development such as agricultural business, more residential, recreational, retail, or light commercial that is more in character to the area and fits within the vision of the Town of Johnstown's 2006 Comprehensive Plan. Compatibility is key, to those of us within Indianhead, and to most everyone else in the area. The MMM Asphalt/Concrete facility is not. After having reviewed the MMM application, of course we' re concerned about the pollution; the dust; the odor and the noise from trains locomotives and steel cars banging into each other; the rock crushing operations; and after what the various application exhibits describe — 24/7/365 (i.e. "continuous") activity associated with heavy industrial "sounds" and visual impacts of train, truck, tractor, loader, rock crushing equipment, etc. This sounds awful. Nobody wants to live in a place with a rock crushing facility in their backyard . Those concerns are obvious to everyone and MMM has proposed a handful of technological "upgrades" to alleviate or at least monitor those impacts. But what we feel may be a larger more encompassing issue to evaluate with regards to the potential placement of this facility will affect the overall northern Colorado community, especially the frequent US 34 commuters. Observation of US 34 traffic, especially at peak commuting hours, will demonstrate that. EXHIBIT Case #USR 15-0027 For Public Record We work in Fort Collins. In the last ten years, this commute north has become ever so fast paced and busy. The crossing of the east bound lanes of US 34 at Weld County Road (WCR) 15, has steadily become more challenging, due to the previously discussed growth in northern Colorado. There are times when, as a result of unrelenting east bound traffic, an accident between WCR 15 and the Centerra traffic light or increasingly, train movements/stoppage crossing US 34 blocking / backing up traffic east to WCR 17 (and beyond), that we head south on WCR 15 to west bound Highway 402 to get out to I-25. An annoyance, "sure", but a sacrifice of sorts for living in such a wonderful part of the world. The addition of between 1,129 and 2,260 primarily slower moving, fully loaded dump truck and semi- truck trips will further impact an already VERY busy US 34 corridor. According to MMM's traffic study, 185 vehicles/hour (107 large heavy trucks), for year 2017, expanding to 320 vehicles/hour, (227 large heavy trucks) predicted for year 2035, will be added to the mix as a result of vehicle flow associated with this site in the morning peak as a result of this proposed plant to the traffic flow. Afternoon peaks have similar impact. The WCR 13 northbound truck stacking at US 34 with drivers attempting to turn westbound across the east bound US 34 may develop into a situation where CDOT will have to mitigate this intersection with a traffic light or other means (and no doubt sooner as opposed to later), further slowing down US 34 commuters east and west bound. When time is money, MMM trucks will then most likely choose to use these "alternate" routes as the residents of Indianhead and the surrounding community are sometimes required to do. These "alternate" routes will then further subject Weld and Larimer County roads to more, previously unplanned heavy truck traffic and further deteriorating the overall circulation in this area. MMM's proposal is counting on CDOT for future widening of US 34 to six lanes and install an interchange (presumably with overpass and acceleration/deceleration lanes) to the interchange at US 34 and WCR 13. With the difficulty for the State of Colorado and CDOT to obtain funding for a sixth lane improvement project from Longmont to Wellington on I-25 — how soon would a potential widening and related highway improvements occur on US 34? In the interim, snarled US 34 traffic, increased trips on Highway 402 traffic, and the inability to cross at WCR 13 and the Indianhearl, Coyote Ridge and I aknta Lakes entrance at WCR 15 will be the new reality for all US 34 commuters too. We urge you to review the application materials closely, and consider these many impacts with much thought. Controlled growth thru appropriate planning and development decisions are vital. We look to our leaders to make wise and sound decisions that affect the whole. We appreciate the opportunity to voice our concerns. No doubt we will see you at the forthcoming hearing later this summer. Respectfully, Jeff and Mary Kroeger Indianhead West Estates 6751 Apache Road Johnstown, CO 80534 jkroeger@bhadesign.com Case # USR 15-0027 For Public Record May 18, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 970-353-6100 ext 3524; Fax: 970-304-6498 daungst@weldgov.com Weld County Commissioners: Re: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development I am a resident in this community and live on C.R. 56. I am not opposed to development but I am opposed to this development. I attended the Community Meeting at Best Western Hotel and specifically asked about traffic on County Road 56. I was told traffic would not be entering or exiting on 56, however, now I have learned that Martin Marietta intends to utilize all roads in the area when County Road 13 is blocked. I have several objections to this plan: Traffic: • County Road 13 is buckling at the Railroad Track that comes from Windsor. There is also damage to the road closer to Highway 34 on CR 13. This road hasn't had the extensive truck traffic that is predicted under the plan — the road has already been repaired twice in the last 2-3 years. • CR 56 is a dirt road barely wide enough for 2 cars to pass. During rain and snow trucks cause damage to the road making it difficult to maneuver in the slick mud . • CR 56 has had 5 cars stuck on the road last year with minimal snowfall. • Trucks habitually speed the 1/2 mile straight stretch of the road. • Truck traffic will increase the dust from the road . Lighting: • Any lighting should be Dark Sky Compliant. Currently at Gerrard's there is a set of lights that when lit shines directly into my bedroom window. This has happened 4 times over this last winter. • I enjoy looking at the stars, additional lighting will interfere with my hobby Noise: • Currently the noise level at night is quiet with the exception of a periodic train and animal noises. • The level of noise will increase from quiet to just around the maximum allowed for this development. This will interfere with sleep and being able to enjoy the evening on the deck. • I like my windows open and additional noise will interfere with reading, t.v. etc. • Allowing Noise to exceed the maximum levels as stated in the report could happen is unacceptable. EXH IT Odor: • We currently have very little odor in the community. This plant will create odor at the maximum level. • We have had smells from the feed lot when the winds are from the east. Most of our wind is from the North blowing the odor from the proposed plant directly to our house. • From the reports, how can it be determined that odor emissions will never cause a problem to our community? Trains: • Train and truck vibration can impact the quality of life we enjoy in our community • Increased train traffic will cause delays on all roads — CR 13, 56, 3, 20, 15, Hwy 402 and Larimer County Rd 18. • Noise from trains coupling, unloading, traveling on the spur leading to wheel noise, train engines constantly running will be at a high level our community hasn't had before. • How often will trains be unloading? How will seasonal traffic affect this operation and the surrounding businesses? There are too many questions unanswered with this proposal. • We were told the trains will come from the south. Will that still be true? Community: • Martin Marietta is vague about the definition of Community. We are the community, those properties that are adjacent or in the immediate area where the plant is planned. Our Community is agriculture and residential — Martin Marietta does not benefit our community. • Visual Impact will be severe. The presented berm will be minimal, with only grass as vegetation. Trains will be visible as there isn't a buffer zone or vegetation to block the view. • The Berm should shield activities from CR 13 and CR 56. Pollution : • Cement dust will blow onto surrounding fields creating a concrete crust during rain and snow. • Will they contain all contaminants (via air, water, and soil leach) from entering surrounding properties? • Have ALL pollution sources been thoroughly studied? From reading the report the air quality report did not appear to do so. There have been comparisons to the loading facility to the west. This facility is nowhere near the noise level and impact to our quality of life that this proposed plant will have. I live in the county to enjoy the quiet solitude and sounds of nature. I don't feel that I should be forced to stay indoors to avoid the noise, odor, dust and lights that will plague us with this development. We urge the commissioners to seriously consider these issues. With the development of Centerra, this operation is not conducive to the area's plan. I don't want to see a hodge podge of development similar to Hwy 85. Sincerely, Janet Ross 6248 CR 56 Loveland, CO 80534 Diana Aungst Subject: FW: Interesting News Articles From: John Cummings {mailto:jxcummings@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 1:33 PM To: Mike Freeman; Barbara Kirkmeyer; Julie Cozad; Sean Conway; Steve Moreno Subject: Interesting News Articles Commissioners: Attached are a couple of news articles, one from the Greeley Tribune on the MMM proposal and one from the Rifle Post Independent. Both are good articles, especially the Post Independent article regarding a decision by commissioners to "error" on the side of caution concerning the affects emissions and other contaminates from a proposed asphalt plant would have on the adjacent Organic Farm Operation. Also, as some might know we have an 120 acre Organic Farm operation less than 400 yds from the proposed Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development site (USR15-0027). The farm is used by Motherlove based out of Fort Collins to raise herbs used in their organic care products "for pregnant women". The company is nationally known and has a long history of supporting organic farming and sustainably sourced materials and is a company concerned about communities and the environment. John Cummings 26700 Weld County Road 13 970-333-7234 Concerned Citizen EXHIBIT 1 I _AR_ • tntE us ox faC8b00�( Luce now! P'lI'FlJDlJIle Serving Greeley and Weld County, CO noVEnTIIWACTIT NEWS SPORTS ENTERTAINMENT MARKETPLACE -�l � illy Classifieds Jobs Real Estate Autos Place Ad Obituaries Local News Crime Announcements Business Opinion News Briefs Q O http://www.greelevtribune.com/news/business/16327549-113/neighbors-claim-martin- marietta-plant-will-ruin-the I3ridgett Weaver bweaver@greeleytribune.com Back to: Business May 16, 2015 Follow Business Submit Your News Neighbors claim Martin Marietta plant will ruin the gateway to Greeley and their lifestyles Article Comments (0) The Weld County Planning Commission will make a recommendation after a hearing, which hasn't been scheduled yet. Residents think the hearing could be in July. The Weld County Commission will then hear the recommendation and either approve or reject the company's plans. When Jim Piraino looks out the window of his Indianhead Estates home in way-out-west Greeley, he sees open fields backing up to the mountains. When he walks outside, he hears birds chirping and, on a windy day, the sound of his flag flapping against the flagpole. But Piraino is worried his personal oasis may be interrupted with an industrial project, and he and his neighbors aren't happy. Martin Marietta submitted plans to the county proposing a $20 million concrete and asphalt plant with a rail unloading facility. The proposed facility and Indianhead Estates would share the space south of U.S. 34 between Weld County Roads 13 and 15. "I'm not embarrassed to tell you when I built this home it was intended to be my dream home. We have a unique neighborhood here," Piraino said. "It's more like a lifestyle than a neighborhood." THE PLAN Piraino said he doesn't see why the facility has to be in his back yard, but David Hagerman, regional vice president of aggregates for Martin Marietta said the company did extensive studies, which pointed to 27486 Weld County Road 13, as the best option. The company anticipates a rail loop spurring off the Union Pacific Railroad that would unload aggregates and asphalt cement one to three times per week by a train with up to four locomotives and up to 117 cars. The site is expected to generate 1 , 120 daily truck trips into the site and grow to an estimated 2,260 by the year 2035, mostly during peak summer demand. The plan is to bring the aggregate in from Wyoming by train for making the asphalt and concrete. Aggregate is the big rocks that are ground into the material needed for making asphalt and concrete. Hagerman and Martin Marietta said their facility would have great economic impacts on the community, including the creation of 100 jobs. Neighbors said they want it built somewhere else somewhere out of the direct sight of their kitchen windows. INDUSTRIALIZING THE GATEWAY TO WELD Martin Marietta has applied for a Use by Special Review to change the potential use of the land to suit its needs. Residents worry that once one heavy industrial facility moves in, it will be easier for others to encroach on their pocket of peace. Dave Kisker, a resident of Indianhead Estates, said Indianhead Estates isn't the only community being affected by this. Kisker and others in the 4-5 square mile radius came together to form the inter-neighborhood committee to fight the proposed plans, of which Kisker took the lead. He said he and all of the other neighbors aren't naïve. They knew the land would eventually be developed. But the land is zoned for agriculture and commercial use — not heavy industrial, and many of them took that into account before buying homes there. Piraino worried this will be a step toward making the U.S. 34 corridor industrial, like U. S. 85 . "I would have no problem with housing. I would have no problem with what's going on in Larimer with banks and that type of commercial, but heavy industrial?" Piraino said. "I knew at some point in time there was going to be something out here, but I did not envision this monstrous plant." Hagerman said they did a lot of research before choosing this location from 13 others, and they've made a lot of changes to it so as not to affect local neighborhoods. Martin Marietta has offered to build 10-foot berms, set the facility 30 acres away from residents and use special techniques to control dust and odor. "We chose this specific location because it needed rail access. We need access to the transportation system. We needed a piece of property large enough to put the operation on," said David Hagerman, regional vice president of aggregates for Martin Marietta. "We were looking for a location that would have the least impact to the community," Hagerman said. Landowners, who now contend with none of these issues, say even having the issues is a problem for their land value and for their happiness. TOO LITTLE, TOO LATE Renata Meusch lives in Greeley but commutes to the 2534 corridor daily for work. Meusch and her husband also just bought property directly in the warpath. "We were so excited. This was our paradise acre," she said. "We purchased the lot and two weeks later we got the notice." Beyond her paradise acre, Meusch is won-ied about what affect this will have on Greeley as a whole. She worries opening this area up to industrial development will end in a U.S. 85-esque or Commerce City-like corridor. "We've just gotten rid of the stigma of living in a smelly cow town," she said. "This area is becoming a destination attraction with all of those new businesses coming in. That's the gateway to Weld County." 0 Rifle asphalt plant plan concerns organic farm RIFLE, Colorado - The operators of an organic farm near the Garfield County Regional Airport have serious concerns that an asphalt batch plant proposed next door could negatively impact the farm's organic certification. "An asphalt plant is the worst possible neighbor that an organic farm could have," said Ken Sack, owner of the 1,200-acre Eagle Springs Organic farm situated along Mamm Creek, just east of the airport. Speaking at a public hearing before the Garfield Board of County Commissioners Monday, Sack said the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), which is responsible for certifying organic growers, frowns on industrial uses nearby. Any errant air or soil pollution that is detected by state regulators in produce or meat from livestock raised at the farm could jeopardize the USDA's organic stamp of approval, he said. Since starting the farm three years ago, Sack said he has invested more than $12 million in Garfield County. The farm itself employs close to 50 people, he said. Plans are to open an organic food market in Rifle, and the farm is also prepared to sell its products to the new Whole Foods store that is under construction in Basalt. County commissioners postponed until Feb. 21 a decision on plans by Charles Ellsworth of Bedrock Resources LLC to relocate an existing asphalt plant from a site near Silt to a 35-acre site just west of Eagle Springs farm. "The farming folks are asking some relevant questions here," Commissioner Mike Samson said. "But I feel very inadequate to make any decisions today until I have more information about what would be emitted from the plant, and what that impact could be." Commissioners directed county planning staff to seek more information on toxic emissions from asphalt plants, and how agriculture officials view that impact on neighboring farms. Tom Peterson, executive director of the Colorado Asphalt Pavement Association, spoke on behalf of Ellsworth's plan. He said asphalt plants aren't nearly as polluting as they once were. In 2002, the Environmental Protection Agency and the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment both delisted asphalt plants as major polluters, he said. "Our industry recognizes the need for environmental responsibility, and to have a minimal impact," Peterson said. Ellsworth's attorney, Dave Smith, said the plant operators will work with the farm to lessen the impact, same as nearby gas-drilling operations have done. "In short, we would like to be as good a neighbor as possible, and be a model for the kind of partnership that can happen between industry and agriculture in the county," Smith said. Commissioner Tom Jankovsky said he was ready to vote in favor of the new asphalt plant, but agreed to wait for more information about possible pollution. "My family eats organic, and I support agriculture and what you're doing for local ag and providing jobs," Jankovsky said. "But I also know the Ellsworth family, and they provide jobs as well. "This is also private property, and they have a right to do things on that property," he said. "Any concerns about pollution are just speculation." r r. a t.,-, 1‘.177.) MAY 18235 CAL432..._) it " `•.'. Gi EELEEY OFHCE rill3 ) * 0 .) s— LJJttI art- 11-Te. p, dern Pect-nrii".= glitAitynt/o-- a-4 Pia,en.,<A".5_ shit-b_e /SS5 f 1 .7*- rtsk9..._ Semsai eat Po Co 31 97a - 3 5 3 4 6 / Do )uy.t 350t-if -Rib 9 76 - 3 012 4.0.2mArt- Q) (Aie,teir t c ' -ice (L n � �l�-�� tr ; Er' Piez,1 " s R15 - doa7 : _ Plem,Le 7)) ' 51 ayb-diodo _ 417 bk- nlaA144_, 172611 ±b, Acittiwas (A)-zt_ads anti, & crut wt- rity -4 aredutto - /u-4(2.-c, - - tiut_ &U/ d}24.1 eed-a €4. aAn-clieL WY\ eeetra-itt Y/ 7/26• S: Wee- tv-b--Or tp 6(--4JL- 0-tuk IQtL - 0 1a4 te4 t2& EXHIBIT f (A, Cc f*ArztA6_, ,3 44Acto--L _ 4€-2/4,. duz,07toct. ays--k fre_4 ao See)r Ot-vni /4),v2 Z444 Mt/ 8Zitee- Actt ( VI, eCr /2-"IPA;t-L ctAtzitlo fUtd-- t !-it 7'Gr o- ' 2 ccAA—seL cto-1„)f- wee7k)C h-) fly `Ant- j4-0e) d#no-Ad._ '9r 6-co h-sk dLy(14i- . w /27 &int 11 ti.t. 6--Z4eA. /4-L&I-v _Qakcilo ouaele 6-te,t &trite -124,c,c, eta n /t 74. /Lei-cde;.1_. r,� .! �`- —Are, Vi2.� # . c9-7 70 P RprirlyrrniN _MAY 18 2015 I C Ck s -Q. . 1 5 -- 0 ° 2 7 `a,;etd County f-In:,ici ; t:ttLt Vrt-tt -L: atx\' - I .? — , e \KJ ck 0 LA 1N-1 \t„i e--0—sints:sce\ASS 0 at.) •ik:)‘ s Eme \CA )6; ;45 A e F\ crlp LA sic< r 0a ~f -- c' r CP - mcAre V ► ck-- Ctr‘.`12--C% 'N•H s tqc: -ex or g Sft-at rC -42-k 0 \tv\ cL ,NN.\ ckc \VA rTh t %Lt. \ 5 *- • 1/4.#‘ 3 ca sat2-siskik_o _ eas: _ -7c Win._ K. e / 1 � C osece \ ;L--\% al vim- etniteNte- S__Catt-e CA, sosA4.& I it--$SC.3 a5r C- get-NTS-NA _CLMISL___e `a Si a ‘4- Pri :it %aito-so C t\ints- 1"ge ct 50 p` Fir / • /� ri U c.. CC `"\-'`t'' ` 1 C dr 2- 7 _ trete t rnm\- C‘ cas, %(-4 C /11/4ierk S •-o _ 3 - C:Do \SAM1/44ity 0 \ e �� T / S 1 '1.t t1 / t/ taw EXHIBIT VA3/4i &-^. V - . Moo _ careat _.. ..��. E s 1 C . _ ot.‘„ _ .. . __NY U Cam` _. J.-a ec, 1.3 ca_e_mivj e -Non, X nick_ _ 7ar 4z‘ °L. ;IN) _ _ \tsfreateLk3._ c Cc:wa 5 `C -o c _— _ Ss".4a \..Q.\\ 3V #1814 1/447., \-) 1.1 c eaL: v1/4) \-; (v.& s Va,e,\ 0_ ).,) .3 V Hi \*.. LA.rv-st t4.--\"\N\re‘. kS .1k: 5 _)1/4.)- asst.; _ ?saes _so 1.1 c.1/4. c. - ' .r - ° . . ,.�. c �1` 3 _ e 'me\ C.ANK C_Ct.. $ - - -- ere -e i C gC..) \_ _ ),..1 CA- S .. -,0-t'C- - _- -jV ` .o - - - w a _ __it? L5d iA.A. ct c'c. \%\(P ICX:r Cse k 5 LA t *ft C Nemr ,a, aar Ct., _1/4e CloftwX _ Ala 5 - 2 t 7-Art klb$ P\ Jar ecu.NO-- \iy -12- \ occi1/41 %-ca__ C-cit par -- _ Os : c'a _ - - CV.•••ii. --r c ,\ cst_ _c3e, 0 c -, ) GL,:r`it1/41PN i %A.C _ Lisp ScS._utmu \ixo Lt.) 3 -de Qz, ( a_ 1?tavos‘aacQ 3S Jan te-e 1ca�,.,�a` Cs `r'Vic? cat 50 "Ci- s- - Voc:A-c \ ci Ostr Ip3 Waa . ' SU thtt:. Atn, a ��. .ssaiot. $) e vo sr _Poc-Q 5 ti 1 NUMPO Box 669 970-686-2798 Windsor, CO 80550 www.nocohba .com HBA info@nocohba .com 5-19-15 Weld County Commissioners PO Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 Dear Commissioners: I am writing this to express our (NOCO HBA) unified support for the project—the Highway 34 Project—being proposed by Martin Marietta Materials. As a trade and business association, we support those projects which are economically sound, balanced with environmental and neighborhood concerns, of course. This project will help control the escalating housing costs—costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area— by providing a cost benefit to one of the most basic building components, aggregate and related products. It makes sense to further ease the transportation burden that might otherwise be realized if the proposed project's materials were to be shipped via highway traffic versus rail. And finally, locating near existing rail lines utilizes land that might otherwise go underutilized, replacing it instead with a revenue generating enterprise for the surrounding area, both on a public basis as well as the private monies generated and distributed. NOCO HBA represents some 235 business members ranging from consultants, engineers, banks, trade contractors and builders, as well as their collectively some 11,000 employees as reported by the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB). The cost savings realized—estimated to be as much as 75%--for aggregate and related products will help mitigate cost increases and keep the local building economy viable, and home prices affordable. Please contact me if I can provide more information or further comments that would impact your support for this important project. We are interested in solutions that are economically advantageous not just for industry, but ultimately the end user of our work, the home-buying public. Thank you for your consideration. /ay Gregory A. Miedema, CAPS, CGB, CGP, CGR Shawn Matz, Advanced Interiors Executive Officer, NOCO HBA 2015 N0CO HBA Chairman EXHIBIT • mom ' t Case # USR 15-0027 For Public Record May 21, 2015 Weld County Department of Planning Services EXHIBIT c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II 1555 N. 17th Avenue 1 53 Greeley, Colorado 80631 970-353-6100 ext 3524; Fax 970-304-6498 daungst@weldgov.com Re: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development Weld County Commissioners: I am writing this letter to express my opposition to the above referenced application and development proposal. After attending an open house hosted by Martin Marietta regarding their plans and reading their proposal, I believe that this proposal does not meet the requirements outlined in Sec. 23-2-200 of the Weld County Code requiring that the "USES by Special Review ...be compatible with existing and planned land uses in the neighborhood." Furthermore, I believe that the applicant has failed to meet the requirements of Sec. 23-2-200 by not demonstrating that it has designed the "USES to ...protect and promote the health...convenience and general welfare of the present and future residents of the county." To the contrary, it is my belief that the "USES" proposed would be a nuisance to residents of the adjacent residential communities and the surrounding areas by having potentially 24/7 periods of noise, night time light pollution, a smelly and potentially unhealthy environment, and creating inconveniences for the surrounding thoroughfares and businesses with the high volume of truck and train traffic. And once established, continue to operate, expand, and attract similar industries for their own benefit at the expense and general disregard for the "general welfare of the present and future residents of the county." It is my hope that this application will be denied for being incompatible with the existing community. My wife and I purchased property in the adjacent residential development of Indianhead Estates in 1986. We designed and built our own house and moved in April of 1987. We chose this community to build our dream home for three reasons: location, location, location . We were attracted to an established neighborhood in a quiet rural setting. We loved the open farm lands surrounding the area and the unparalleled view of the Front Range. We designed and situated the house to take full advantage of the amazing vista. For 28 years we have enjoyed the unobstructed view from our master bedroom and deck on the west side of our house. ( Image attached) The negative visual impact of Martin Marietta's proposed operation is probably the biggest issue I have against approving their application. The massive operation will not only obstruct and taint the views from our neighborhood, but will also impact the views from all of the areas surrounding our neighborhood. it would be an eyesore from all directions. We take daily walks around the roads in our neighborhood and along the irrigation ditch that runs along the proposed site. Those walks serve as daily reminders of how lucky we are to live in this part of Weld County. I'm sure you can imagine how unsightly the landscape would become if their application is approved . I've also attached a picture of us enjoying a leisurely walk and the view of the Front Range from near the proposed site. It would no doubt affect our lifestyle and cause us to change our routine if this facility comes to be. Not only will our neighborhood be affected by the visual impact; everyone who drives on highway 34 will have full view of the site. Since County Road 13 is the county line for Weld County, their asphalt plant, concrete plant, trains, a steady stream of trucks coming and going, and mounds of aggregate, recycled concrete and recycle asphalt would be the first or the last thing that travelers along highway 34 would see in Weld County. I would hate to see Highway 34 start to resemble industrialized Highway 85 as it heads toward Denver. The one and only effort on Martin Marietta's part to minimize the visual and noise impact would be to construct earthen berms throughout the site. However, the berms would only be partially effective if you were at the same ground level and near the site. For instance, Highway 34 is approximately 40 feet higher than the entrance to the proposed site with only an eleven foot berm to block part of the view. The streets in Indianhead Estates are anywhere from 15 to 60 feet higher than the entrance to the proposed site. Eleven foot berms would be ineffective to a large degree. County Road 15 varies from 20 to 80 feet higher than the entrance to the proposed site. Berms along that area would transition from 11 to about 24 feet above the south end of the site. It would seem that the berms were only a token gesture to mitigate the visual and audible impacts of their operations since you would be able to see over the berms from almost any vantage point. In essence, anything over 11 feet tall would be visible from the outside. This would include railroad cars, heavy equipment used to move aggregate, mounds of aggregate, mounds of recycled material, buildings, a concrete batch plant, an asphalt patch plant, storage silos, conveyor belts; i.e. practically everything. As I said before, the visual impact of the proposed site is probably at the top of the list of my personal objections to the approval of their application. There are many more issues too numerous to list and expand upon. However, here is a brief list of other key concerns that I have. It is not intended to be a complete list of objectionable matters. • The enormous amount of truck traffic that will be generated when the plant would be operating at its full potential and the consequences of that traffic on the infrastructure and on causing traffic jams. • The noise that will be created by the ongoing operations at the site and the noise created by the train and truck traffic. We already have a considerable amount of traffic noise from Highway 34. With the wide open spaces around this area of Weld County, we can hear the existing train traffic from miles away. It would only get worse given the close proximity to their proposed site. • The operation going on potentially around the clock, seven days a week, every day of the year is unacceptable. • Living next to an asphalt plant, concrete plant, and a railroad switching yard would have a profound negative effect on the desirability to build a home or live in our neighborhood. I know that I would not have chosen to build my dream home here if that sort of operation had existed at the time. It could also be a bad selling point for current residents who might be moving and trying to sell a home located next to this type of facility as well as deterring development of other residential areas. • One of my biggest fears is that by changing the zoning to allow industrialization of this area, it would open the door to expansion and development of similar or other heavy industrial businesses that would not be compatible with our existing community. If a zoning change happened, we would lose our ability to have any say in future developments around our neighborhood. It would most assuredly have a negative impact on our quality of life. Thank you for taking time to consider my objections to the Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development project. I would encourage each of you to personally visit our neighborhood and surrounding area to see for yourself what impact such an operation would have on our local community. I believe you will agree that it is not a good fit and would not be in the best interest of the citizens in this part of Weld County. Sincerely, /410_40A1 A Sy0a Larry A. Sipes 6900 Commanche Court ( Indianhead Estates) Johnstown, CO 80534 hoosierdaddy23912@yahoo.com irr. • • • f �• ( . ,. an; •• - AC • 1 r /y \ • I i - •• ale it illiN ' _ IA X•id ;1 1 l�jl �' -. r ; • 1 Ir _ _ .1. 1 i • :., C' , � . V, r liktaMpote•. •-•+.0•ae 111%7• s' • ref*VT ISII......^ ik e 111 a ` • f• �� 1• te k4•�c /. ii. I • .ikkirrillillipr 116 W, wit elarni"lir_ l 1 i 1 -0401 11. y -1 I • r fr�y.y ' orr .a • t . ' lr ' e' -�� , . �, ` -. :/ • . .a. 4 .." , •! '8 . ..,' t - 1. '1 r• I ii. •,, N.[•• . , 1 ,- t •..� 1• • • •• , . :.) ^r 4 •V. • 17. • S ' J ,� AID t� ,... .., ;-,‘ J - i 441. �� Case #USR 15-0027 For Public Record May 18, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 970-353-6100 ext 3524; fax 970-304-6498 daungst@weldgov.com Re: Planning Application USR 15-0027; Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development With regard to the above project, we would like to express concerns we have regarding the proposed development. We have owned our home on Road 402 since 1972. The proposed development is not compatible with this "community". This is an agricultural and residential area and should remain that way. Two things that concern us are as follows: • Traffic on 402 would likely be increased substantially and since this is a road that is frequently used by tractors and farm machinery, as well as bicycle enthusiasts, this would certainly be potentially an extremely dangerous situation. The speed limit over the years has been quite low; however, as we know, that is seldom obeyed and difficult to enforce. • Train traffic will also likely increase significantly, causing lengthy delays on Highway 34 as well as on 402 and other roads which could certainly be potentially a very serious problem. Train noise, vibration and whistles can be very disturbing. Additional issues of concern from this application include noise, pollution, health issues, odor and lighting. Considering the substantial burden on the applicant to prove that the planned operations will be compatible with existing and planned uses in the neighborhood, we ask our elected and appointed officials to deny the application. Yours very truly, Roger and Joyce Amundson 2519 11th Avenue, Unit A, PMB 135 Greeley, CO 80631 970-381-2779 EXHIBIT RFCFAVFD Case # USR 15-0027 MAY P ( 2015 For Public Record Weld County Haei,;;,;d cNa"uuuc GREELEY OFFICE Date: May 16, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17`h Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 Weld County Commissioners: RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027; Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development My wife and I built our retirement home 13 years ago next to a lake on the family farm along CR 56. It's been a quiet, serene setting which has provided much enjoyment over the years, at least until now. The planned asphalt and concrete plants would drastically change our quality of life. There are many adverse impacts this facility would have on this "neighborhood" environment, but the most damaging for us personally would be the following: NOISE - the rail loop would be a mere 316 feet behind our house (Receptor ID R2). Screeching wheel noise from constant turns on the tracks, as well as the banging of can as trains stop and start would severely degrade our outdoor life style. In addition, the train cars will be unloading gravel just inside the south berm, very near our house. At times, this noise would be constant! ODOR - Our property is located south and slightly east of the proposed asphalt plant. The prevailing wind direction would carry this odor towards our house. My wife has respiratory problems which would be exacerbated by these emissions. aISITEXt POLLUTION - Airborne dust will be generated from the dumping of aggregate onto the nearby conveyor belt. As I mentioned above, these are but a few of the detrimental impacts of this proposed facility, which also include traffic jams on Hwy 34, visual impact, light pollution, effects on water quality, etc. Surely there is a more appropriate and compatible site for the construction of this plant, other than next to a large housing community! In our case, quality of life will definitely be degraded by the proposed plant If the USR is approved, my wife and I strongly feel that Martin Marietta should either buy our property at market value or provide a sizable economic compensation. S. c ely, Wilbur " 11" Boe i bkboegli@lpbroadband.net MAILBOX: YOUR TAKE Heavy industrial use isn't right for 2534 development I commute from Greeley to the 2534 busi- ness district by Centerra every weekday. 'llatl e is challenging on a normal day with trucks, trains, weather, etc. What will traffic be like on U.S. 34 if Martin Marietta gener- ates "1,120 daily truck trips into the site" at U.S. 34 and Weld County Road 13? They are proposing a 24./7/365 operation, so what will the weekends and summers be like for + travelers and vacationers to our wonderful state of Colorado? How will an asphalt plant be compatible with the commercial area development? Do we really want the gateway into Weld County from the west (the sign is right before Weld 13) be an aggregate/concrete/ asphalt plant? What will the noise, pol- 1, lution, odor, and visual impact be on this beautiful area? 'Phis parcel ot'land will probably eventu- ; ally be developed, but rezoning this area to heavy industrial use is not compatible at this location. Let's bring "100 more jobs to Weld" by choosing one of the other 13 locations in Weld County that Martin Marietta has re- searched in their Site Selection Plan. n, RENATA MFuscH, amity EXHIBIT S Diana Aungst From: CLR-34 NA [clr34na a@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 21 , 2015 8:06 AM To: James Sharn Cc: Diana Aungst Subject: Re: Martin Marietta Materials Proposed Highway 34 Development Mr. Sham, I am disappointed that Martin Marietta continues to be unwilling to respond in any reasonable fashion to the concerns of the various neighborhoods surrounding your proposed Highway 34 Project. I suggest you re-read my previous email. As I said therein, we are not interested in simply rehashing your application as it stands. We have studied it thoroughly and reviewed it with the residents of the area and our land-use consultant, and it's completely unacceptable in its current form. While we understand that you are scheduling meetings so that you can assert that you are meeting the County's requirements for attempting to "work with neighbors", in fact, you have added nothing significant to your plan from January, confirming that you have NOT in fact demonstrated any concern for the neighborhoods or compatibility with them. Simply saying you are a "good neighbor" does not make it so. While it will be up to the neighborhoods' residents to decide whether to take their valuable time at your meeting so that you can rehash your application and attempt to "check off' that requirement box, we WILT, emphasize to them and the County that you have made no meaningful changes since January, except as you have said in the newspapers, to have your various "experts" write documents that say that "there is no problem". As for mitigation steps, it is Martin Marietta that is causing the problem. It is up to Martin Marietta to fix it. It is NOT incumbent upon the neighborhoods to negotiate with you, unless you show some sort of TRULY good faith and make a real effort to respond to our concerns, ideally by abandoning your application for this site but at the very least by substantially revising your application from your original January plan. We have informed the County with over 50 submissions as of this writing that your application fails to meet any reasonable definition of compatible due to noise, odor, visual impact, pollution, traffic and other negative impacts and hazards. So, until and unless you make significant adjustments to your application, you will not be able to demonstrate that you are working with the neighbors. You have not changed anything! As I indicated, the CLR-34NA, representing over 200 people has been delegated the task to organize and lead the interaction with Martin Marietta. By avoiding working with us, you are not demonstrating any willingness to make progress on this issue. If you should revise your stance and wish to engage in a useful discussion, we are willing to do so, but you MUST take the first step by proposing substantial revisions to your application. We look forward to any real attempt to resolve the issues. EXHIBIT Dave Kisker President, CLR-34 Neighborhoods Assn. I q On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 9:59 PM, James Sham <james.sharn@martinmarietta.com> wrote: Mr. Kisker: 1 Thank you for responding to my email sent to Mr. Dirks. Martin Marietta is very interested in hearing input from neighbors about our proposed project. That was the purpose of our January 27th concerning the Highway 34 project. Based on the input gathered at that meeting, we engaged third-party experts to conduct studies on traffic impacts, air quality, water, wildlife, and noise. We plan on sharing that information and reviewing our USR application at a second neighborhood meeting scheduled June 9 from 6:30 to 9 pm at the University Schools Auditorium, 6519 18th Street, Greeley. A notice will be going out the neighbors inviting them to the meeting. I reached out to Mr. Dirks from his comments in the newspaper and that he is president of the HOA for Indianhead subdivision. In various newspaper articles, you and Mr. Dirks have mentioned mitigation ideas that could be implemented for the project. Martin Marietta is interested in hearing those ideas. We would like to meet with you and CLR-34 board members to discuss possible mitigation measures and the project. If you would like to sit down individually or as a representative of CLR-34, I would welcome that meeting. Thank you for your time. Sincerely James Sham From: CLR-34 NA [mailto:clr34na@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 1:15 PM To: James Sharn Subject: Martin Marietta Materials Proposed Highway 34 Development Mr. Sham: It's my understanding that you have approached Mr. Wolfgang Dirks of Indianhead Estates regarding the possibility of setting up some sort of neighborhood meeting to discuss your project. At this time, the CLR-34 Neighborhoods Assn. (CLR-34) is representing all of the surrounding residents and businesses that will be so negatively impacted by your project. As such, we understand that you need to attempt 2 to show "diligence" in "working with" the neighbors, as the County will be requiring this as part of their assessment of your project. In principle, we are willing to have such a meeting, but there will be important conditions for you to understand and accept. 1 . The first meeting will be with the members of CLR-34. We have been empowered to represent the viewpoints of the various neighborhoods. 2. You need to provide the definition of "compatible" that you are using that leads you to believe your operation will be compatible. 3 . Prior to any meeting, it will be necessary to provide us details of what you will be proposing above and beyond the application. Please note: Simply rehashing the application will not be sufficient. We have read and studied the application in detail, as has our land use consultant. It is not sufficient, and is not acceptable. It does not show any evidence of good faith, and we believe that as it stands, it represents a project that is clearly incompatible with the surrounding neighbors in numerous ways. To be honest, sir, we are very reluctant to engage with MMM. Your slick (but dishonest) PR campaign, your corporate behavior in other areas of the Country and your misleading statements about this project make it difficult to see what can be accomplished. Nonetheless, in the interest of making sure that you are not able to represent that it is the neighborhoods that are being unreasonable, we are willing to consider engaging, but only if you can demonstrate that we will not be wasting our time listening to more of the same vagueness and dishonesty that your company exhibited not only at the Open House, but also throughout the application. Simply repeating your "good neighbor" rhethoric is not sufficient--we understand that it's the first bullet point in your PR handbook! . In the unexpected event that CLR-34 becomes convinced of your intention to engage in a fruitful manner, then we will arrange for another neighborhoods Town Hall meeting for you to present the agreed-upon results of the discussion with CLR-34. You may respond at this email address and we can proceed from there, depending on your response. Dave Kisker President CLR-34 Neighborhoods Assn. 3 Diana Aungst From: Janet Seter [ladyjane@seter.net] Sent: Monday, May 25, 2015 8:14 AM To: Diana Aungst Subject: Case # USR 15-0027 Case # USR 15-0027 For Public Record Date: 5/24/2015 Weld County Commissioners do Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Ave Greeley, CO 80631 Weld County Commissioners: RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development My family and I live in the Indianhead Estates subdivision. My husband and I moved here right after we were married in 2001 . We don't believe that the Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development belongs next to a neighborhood. It will adversely and directly impact our lifestyle. When I think of the 4th of July, I think of a day full of being outside starting with the Independence Day Parade in Greeley, coming home and the kids playing in the sprinklers, a backyard game of soccer (or whatever the sport of the moment is!), taking the dog for a nice long walk, crawdad fishing in the ditch, grilling steaks in our backyard, and wrapping up the day by curling up in our backyard to watch the fireworks from Windsor, Greeley, Loveland, and when it's clear Fort Collins - not to mention the displays that farmers put on! But I can't imagine this all taking place with the smell of an asphalt plant right next door. And with the nighttime lights, will be be able to see the show in all it's vibrancy? Not to mention the midnight sleeping-bag-in-the-driveway shooting star displays. We moved out here to have land and enjoy it. My kids love to play chase with our dog outside. They ride their bikes and scooters with friends around the neighborhood. We find a relaxing haven working out in the yard and garden. We made a giant sandbox with monkey bars that the kids' friends like to come enjoy. Last summer at a garage sale we found a giant inflatable water slide that we set up on hot days. Birthday parties are usually at our house with everyone from the kids' classes invited. In the winter, we build snow forts and snow men. The neighbor uses his tractor to build little hills for the kids to sled on. Although all of this would still be possible, I don't see any of our normal activities being enjoyable or relaxing with the smells and sounds coming from a plant like this. We can hear the trains going by in the day and night and can't imagine listening to them constantly round the clock. We choose to drive our children into Loveland for school. The closest shopping is also in Loveland, with Target being about 4 miles away. Even the closest convenience store is west of our neighborhood. I am extremely concerned about turning west from County Road 15 - if it will still be possible after all of the traffic changes are implemented for a plant of this size. Will I really have to pull my children out of their school because the driving time will almost double? What will I do when I run out of milk or eggs in the middle of cooking? This area has always given us the convenience of being close to shopping along with a sense of seclusion with everyone on an acre. There is no question - Highway 34 is busier now than it was when we first moved here in 2001 . Our property gives us a beautiful view of all of the fireworks displays throughout the year but we also hear the traffic. In 2013 we had a car crash through our fence coming off the highway at about 5 AM. Not only was that crash an "inconvenience", it was a major safety issue. As I've said, we have a dog and children, and a 30 foot opening onto a busy highway isn't safe. In the past several years, there have been 4 cars that have crashed through the fence into our neighborhood. It had never happened before in the 14 years we've lived here. Adding more trucks and train traffic will not make this better. There is no doubt in my mind that the Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development is not compatible for our neighborhood. It will negatively impact my family's lifestyle in many ways. Sincerely, Janet Seter EXHIBIT ladyjane(a�seter. net 1 5z 1 Diana Aungst From: Kate Brown [kate,brown@thompsonschools.org] Sent: Monday, May 25, 2015 9:24 AM To: Diana Aungst Cc: LRHLEastman@gmail.com Subject: Case # USR 15-0027 May 23 , 2015 Weld County Commissioners C/O Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner 11 Weld County Department of Planning Services 15 5 5N. 17th Avenuse Greeley, CO 80631 EXHIBIT I Z S Weld County Commissioners : RE: Planning Application USR 15 -0027 : Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development I am beyond concerned regarding the Martin Marietta proposal USR 15 - 0027 . As county commissioners, I realize that the decision is ultimately yours . My greatest hope is that you will be able to walk in my shoes . If I can help you to do this, I have faith that this request will be denied. My fears are widespread, however I will focus on just three of my areas of concern: noise pollution, environmental impact and quality of living. On the issue of noise pollution, ten years ago I moved from my lovely home in Fort Collins due to the increased traffic surrounding my housing development. During that time I was diagnosed with a sleep disorder, an ailment which still impacts me today. I moved to Indian Head Estates and to my home in particular because it was quiet. Noise is my enemy, causing me to leave my windows closed 24/7 twelve months of the year. 1 Even with windows closed, there are times when I am awakened by the trains or trucks. The proposed project is planning on constant operations 24 hours per day, 365 days per year. Trains moving, hitching and unhitching, huge trucks moving, backing up with warning signals, starting and stopping engines and motors will be a nightmare for us all. This project cannot avoid having significant impact on the environment. It is incompatible with human well being and wild life survival . Air quality will be impacted due to the constant movement of trucks and trains coming and going. The asphalt plant will emit poisonous gases, the stench from asphalt, as we all know, is horrible. There is some very strong indication that the gases are toxic in nature as well. The holding pond has the potential of leaking in the surrounding land despite any information otherwise. . . .there is no guarantee. Perhaps the most important environmental factor however is the impact on wildlife. Our area of the county is home to red fox, bears, deer, bald eagles, Great Homed Owls, Osprey, Red tailed hawks, and even white pelicans. I daily enjoy watching the wildlife along the south and west edges of my property as I drink my coffee in the sun room in the mornings during the cold months or out on my deck when the beautiful Colorado weather permits. Where will these creatures go and how can we justify intruding in their habitat AND our human habitat? The idea of this kind of business being brought into a residential area is beyond reason ! Why here Martin Marietta? Why not in some other area which is already industrialized? My third area of concern is traffic incompatibility. Currently I drive highway 34 to and from Loveland five days per week for employment. In the recent years the traffic has increased considerably throughout the day but especially during rush hour traffic times. Ten years ago my drive was 15 minutes, it is now 25 to 35 minutes. If a train crosses the highway, the impact is considerable . For example, last week at 4 : 35 P .M. a 13 car train was moving across the track just east Centerra. I timed this crossing and 13 train cars took 3 . 5 minutes to get across Highway 34 . In that short amount of time, the traffic heading east was backed up past the Shell 2 station near Centerrra and the traffic heading west was still slowed down as I approached my turn off at CR 15 ! All of this congestion for only 13 rail cars ! Any time there is stopping along a highway with cars traveling at 65 miles per hour, it causes an increase in traffic safety concerns. Knowing this, why would it be approved for Martin Marietta to build an industrial complex directly impacting the safety and well-being of those traveling Highway 34? ( In addition, there are times that I travel the Highway 402 route instead. This road can not physically handle any increase in traffic. Already the cement factory trucks constantly create traffic delays and safety concerns as they enter 402 or cross the highway at CR 13) . I know that as commissioners, your decisions are never easy . I hope that you will consider what life would be like for you if you lived in our area and how the quality of life for you would be in grave danger if this proposal from a very selfish wealthy business ended up constructing this massive industrial facility right smack in the middle of people wanting to enjoy the peace and beauty of the country in Weld county. Thank you for giving careful and thoughtful consideration to the issues I have raised here . Sincerely, Kate Brown 27477 Hopi Trail Johnstown, CO 80534 kate.brown@thompsonschools . org 3 Case # USR 15-0027 For Public Record May 25, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, Co 80631 daungst@weldgov.com Weld County Commissioners: RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development I believe it is important to factor in the personal side of the proposed development to make a fair and balanced decision. You have been placed in this office by people who trust you for your wisdom and discernment, and are called upon to protect the health, safety and welfare of this neighborhood . I am one of those people, and take pride in the fact that I am of the fourth generation in my family who has chosen to call Weld County our home. I grew up in Platteville, and lived in Greely until 1990 when my job took me to Ft. Collins. Starting before 2006, my husband and I were actively pursuing homes in Indianhead Estates. We felt this neighborhood, above all others, would be the quiet country life which we desired. It was in the fall of 2012, when our prayers were answered, and we purchased the home of our dreams at 27700 Hopi Trail. Our home is on the east side of Hopi Trail. This home is on the western most street in the Indianhead West subdivision. It is in direct line of sight of the proposed industrial development. We were aware at the time of purchasing our home that the farm land to the west was for sale, and could one day sell. We felt confident should this parcel not stay agricultural, the wisdom of the county planners would prevail, and it would be developed in to a beautiful retail, office and/ or residential area. Much the same as the 1-25, Hwy-34 Centerra area . Never in our worst dreams did we think it could be considered for a heavy industrial site. I would like to respectfully state for the record why I feel the Commissioners should not approve this or any other industrial development for this area west of my home. Truck Traffic It is unacceptable to have over 1100 heavily loaded truck trips each day and night on HWY 34. This would cause even more congestion, backups, and accidents on this already burdened highway. These truck trips depending on their destination would also have a negative impact on Weld CR 13, 15, 56, HWY 402, Larimer CR 20 and 3. This would heavily impair my almost daily trips to Ft. Collins for work, church and doctor's appointments. Train Traffic EXHIBIT -2- Again this is unacceptable to have long lines of train cars transferring in and out of an industrial development, and causing congestion, traffic delays, and increase in train/auto accidents on Hwy 34, Weld CR 13, and HWY 402. Much closer to our neighborhood would be the train noise. Including train movement, vibrations, train engines, car switching, and screeching of the train car wheels going thru the rail loop within the proposed industrial area. This activity is stated to run 24/7/365. This would have a negative impact on my quality of life in our neighborhood. This is not acceptable. Plant Noise In addition to the increased noise from the trucks and trains, the noise from the proposed plant operation would be unacceptable. The proposed landscape berm between our neighborhood and the site would be inadequate to buffer noise, as Indianhead West sits higher than the berm. All noise from the operation would go over the berm right to my front door. Pollution and Odor It is unacceptable to have dust from aggregate handling, loading, unloading, hauling and transport drifting into our neighborhood. The applicant admits there is odor associated with asphalt production. These odors are unpleasant and unacceptable to our way of life. Non-compatibility Due to the reasons stated above, this proposed plant would have a negative impact on the pursuit and enjoyment of both indoor and outdoor activities, included are some of these: outdoor dining, and entertaining of guests, gardening, riding our bikes, and going for walks in the peace and quiet of our rural neighborhood . It is my understanding the applicant per their application has considered other locations within Weld County that would be more compatible. Please know Indianhead Estates is not a compatible location. Before you make your decision, I invite the entire Commissioner's to come visit this beautiful rural neighborhood. Drive along Hopi Trail, park your car, get out, listen and enjoy as we do the peaceful surroundings and see for yourself why we are against this proposed industrial development. I trust that you would consider what a negative impact this project would have not only on the future of our neighborhood, but also on the I-25/HWY 34 corridor. it is my prayer for all of you, that God would bless you with increased wisdom and discernment, and vote against this proposed industrial plant. Respectfully Yours, Melanie Schlotter 27700 Hopi Trail Loveland, Co 80534 gmschlotter@gmschlotter.com Please acknowledge receipt of this email Case It USR 15-0027 For Public Record May 25, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner It Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N . 17th Avenue Greeley, Co 80631 daungst@weldgov.com Weld County Commissioners: RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development I am a big proponent of standing for what I believe. I am not throwing rocks at Martin Marietta by being strident, intolerant, or intentionally sowing seeds of discord. I am not opposed to Martin Marietta bringing a plant to Weld County; I just feel there is a more compatible location for this type of heavy industry. In Martin Marietta's application, in the site report, they revealed the Highway 34 development site criterion for "Few Neighbors" was not met, giving this a score of "0". I am opposed to Martin Marietta building a plant at this site. I am sure you realize that any benefits to Weld County's economy will follow any of Martin Marietta's alternate locations. The direction of discussion that I am sure you will be hearing about is the concerns of our neighborhood- an area with distinctive characteristics ! I share in all of those concerns as well: • What may be the health risks for us (I . E. dust and pollution)? • Noise from plant operations and noise and vibration of trains from the railroad loop. Martin Marietta states in their application that they may exceed noise limits. • Odor. How bad and how often? Even Martin Marietta admits in their application that odor will be noticeable at times. • Increased heavy truck traffic on Highway 34, WCR 13, and HWY 34/1-25 corner. • Lighting. How bright and how much will there be since they are applying to operate 24/7? • Will there be a decrease in residential property values? But what is heavy on my mind is COMPATIBILITY: The dictionary's definition of compatible is "Capable of existing or functioning well with others." "Able to exist together without trouble or conflict." Compatibility is the capacity for two systems to work together without having to be altered to do so. If things, systems, or ideas are compatible, they work well together or can exist together successfully. Honestly, I cannot see how any of the negative facts (and there are many) for this proposed asphalt plant can be compatible with the existing view or vista of scenery on the land abutting next to our neighborhood and surrounding community. EXHIBIT (2) Commissioners: What will be built there will remain part of the landscape of this area and influence the character and future developments for decades, as is reflected by the information I just received about rezoning case #COZ 15-0001, which is connected to this site ! Do we want this immediate west entrance to Weld County to be heavy industrial? I sure hope not. I just don't how Martin Marietta Materials can possibly be a "good neighbor" in this location. To me, the fact is; it's just not possible to be compatible. Wouldn't this project be an invasion on the right we have to enjoy our property in the fashion we have been? Our neighborhood, Indianhead Estates West, truly is an area with distinctive characteristics - it is a slice of paradise, and we thank God for it every day. Commissioners, please do not destroy it. Thank you for your thorough and painstaking consideration, and being attentive to potential danger, error, or harm to our community. Respectfully submitted, Glenn Schlotter 27700 Hopi Trail Loveland, Co 80534 gmschlotter@gmschlotter.com Please verify receipt of this email Diana Aungst Subject: FW: Martin Marietta USR-15-0027 Letter of Protest From: scott fenton [maiito:scott fenton55@msn.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 9: 12 AM To: Julie Cozad Subject: Fw: Martin Marietta USR-15-0027 Letter of Protest From: Walter Fenton Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 10:03 AM To: dianeaungst@weldcounty.gov Subject: Martin Marietta USR- 15-0027 Letter of Protest Dear Commissioner Cozad, I am a home owner in Indianhead Estates ,6720 Apache Rd on the newly built homes over looking the Front Range and cornfields , on the west side of this beautiful neighborhood! As you know the entire area is opposed to the rezoning and "Heavy Industrialization", of the land adjacent to Our neighborhood and the effect it will have on our families and friends, and as well as an future residential of commercial business grown in the 25- 34 corridor! ! ! I am against this type of use of the surrounding agricultural land use! The effect on my family is extensive! ! Traffic, is already BAD, even if they put lights on CR 13 and Cr 15 highway 34 is over crowded now and any increase of truck traffic will make my commute worse! The excessive use will cost me more money in taxes! Let alone a railroad loop and transfer station with 117, 40 to 65 ft. cars crossing Co-34 ,Cr- 13 and Cr 15 at the same time or separately. One the benefits of living here is the easy access to Loveland Windsor ,Greeley ,Fort Collins, and Denver all of which will become intolerable if "Martin Marietta, and Eviror-Tech or any other "Heavy Industry" , is allowed the Negatively impact this Community and surrounding Businesses in the 25-34 corridor! The Pollution and noise are not the reason I moved my family to Weld County ! ! The vista of the surrounding farmland and mountains, is why I move here in 2005. The visual UGLUINESS, of these plants is not something my family wants to see off of my back Porch! Even Gerard Excavation is and eye sore to look at even though he built a fence to hide the numerous tractors and equipment it is still UGlY, to see. The pollution , generated by these type of industries both air, ground and water , effect every ones health! Despite the testing , that meet California's Stringent standard, this is not California or L.A and the breathing of dust and drinking contaminated ground water is not conducive to " Good Places to Live", at least not as me or my family is concerned! Let me conclude by saying we are not apposed to growth, and jobs in Weld County We are apposed to reckless use of the land and the impact of rezoning and allowing Heavy Industrialization, will have on the many front range communities that it will surely NEGATIVELY IMPACT! ! Scott Thank You , for your service to this great County! Scott Fenton EXHIBIT cell - 303-594-9832 home - 970-203-9275 I Loa 1 email - Scott Fenton@msn.com www.fentonsfineart.com 2 Diana Aungst From: Larry [larryglover@Ipbroadband.net] Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 9:14 PM To: Diana Aungst Subject: Case #USR 15-0027 Weld County Commissioners Some of my concerns about the Martin Marietta Materials 34 Development are: • The extra traffic on highway 34 which is already congested to the point that it is difficult to get on or off especially when trying to make a left turn • The noise especially at night when we are trying to sleep with the windows open. The trains will wake us up now and if they are loading and unloading train cars at night it will be difficult to sleep with continuous noise. They say that they will put in a berm to block the noise but since our elevation is higher than the elevation of the plot they are proposing to build on it will take a 50 plus foot high berm to block the noise. • They say that we won't notice the dust and odder but unless they have some technology that is better than any other concrete plant and asphalt plant I find that very hard to believe. Since I have an allergy to tars etc. this is some concern to me. Just getting held up in a construction zone where they are putting down asphalt for too long will cause me to start having congestion problems. I feel that any days where we have wind out of the west will be days where I won't be able to spend any time outside other than for a minute or two at a time. Don't know how well our house is sealed but I guess I will find out and if it bothers me even when inside I will be forced to sell and move. Definitely we won't be able to have any windows open anymore. • We bought out here because of the agriculture and rural setting and never expected to have a heavy industrial business for a next door neighbor. Thanks for your consideration Larry Glover EXHIBIT 1 1 (93 Wayne and Christine H. Achz/ger R F C F I V F 6650 Lakota Ct. MAY 2 6 2015 Johnstown, Co 80534 Weld County Planning ut,,a, tr„u,,, GREELEY OFFICE 970-587-7877 77Achztgerg'skybeam.com Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 May 21, 2015 Case #USR 15-0027 For Public Record Weld County Commissioners: RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development This letter is to voice our opposition to the above stated Case number. It is known that asphalt plants release cancer causing toxic air pollutants such as arsenic, benzene, formaldehyde and cadmium into the air as stated by the E.P.A. "Asphalt processing...facilities are major sources of hazardous air pollutants..." The Blue Ridge Environmental Defense League has two studies on adverse impacts on property valves and health for residents living near asphalt plants. "Property value losses were documented up to 56% due to the presence of a nearby asphalt plant." In another study, "nearly half of the residents reported negative impacts on their health from a new asphalt plant." The door-to-door health survey found "45% of residents living within a half mile of the plant reported a deterioration of their health, which began after the plant opened. The most frequent health problems cited were high blood pressure (18% of EXHIBI people surveyed), sinus problems (18%), headaches (14%), and shortness of breath (9%). [BREDL]" Our household has an occupant on oxygen 8o% or more of the time due to Pulmonary Fibrosis. Our fear is that the dramatic increase in air pollutants brought on by the asphalt production and handling and concrete dust, coupled with the increased traffic and effects of additional air pollution and airborne dirt, can cause further breathing problems. The noise pollution from fired up burners will be quite loud as we know from our own personal experience and in a general setting, typically run at all hours day and night. Loss of property value can make it that much more difficult to move away from an undesirable situation, especially since many residents in the surrounding areas are retirees and have a life time invested in their homes, including us. If we had built our home near an existing asphalt facility we would be choosing to accept the negative impact as is, however, as citizens of Weld County we should not be forced to accept such a facility in our own back yard. We appreciate your time and attention to our concerns. Sincerely, dittata. .WA7,41, g Wayne and Christine Achziger 774chziger@skybeam .com 970-587-7877 Diana Aungst From: Paul Markus [psmarkus@Ipbroadband.net] Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 9:25 AM To: Diana Aungst Subject: Case # USR 15-0027 Case # USR 15-0027 For Public Record Date: 5/18/2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 Weld County Commissioners: RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development We are strongly against this proposal due to the compatibility issues presented with this heavy industrial giant as our neighbor. We are Weld county citizens who spend much of our summer on our patio. Entertaining guest and relaxing. It's a pretty area with small wildlife visiting as well as many different song birds that we enjoy. We don't have an air-conditioner and open our windows in the evening to reduce the heat in the house and then again in the morning to capture the cooler air to keep the house comfortable for the day. So specifically our concerns are with: • Noise • Pollution EXHIBIT • Odor • Lighting g g • Visual Impact According to Martin Marietta Materials Noise Analysis, they will barely meet the noise requirements and it is unlikely that the calculations are adequate to use as a basis for approval and although they call for an occasional nighttime operation the noise level will certainly exceed residential standards. The additional lanes on Interstate 25 were poured at night and so again for the purpose of sleep and quality of life I don't see anything in the proposal for lighting or dark skies compliant lights nor noise abatement. Also, the tight radius' of the perimeter rail on the 131 acre site will deliver a shrill and squeal of the train car wheels as well as the banging of the cars from stop and go to unload the cars. I saw no specific plan for dust suppression which will be generated by many operations of the plant, such as aggregate handling- unloading, hauling, washing, and transport. Asphalt manufacturing- drum operation, mixing, exhaust from bag house. Concrete manufacturing and recycling. EPA requires that ALL pollution sources be considered. Also, I couldn't find what the hours of operation are to be or the delivery schedule of the aggregate, how many trains and car-loads of aggregate will be delivered and unloaded in a day and what time will this take place. Martin Marietta Materials states that sometimes odors from the heated materials may emanate from asphalt plants. What is their role in preventing these issues? What is the county's role in correcting these issues? 1 Is there early detection? We believe simple compliance with standards is not sufficient to demonstrate compatibility. Odors of this type would severely impact our quality of life and may be dangerous to our health. Martin Marietta Materials states their business of supplying aggregate product, concrete and asphalt directly benefits the agricultural industry as many agricultural businesses depend on these products to operate their businesses. I believe there is very little demand for asphalt in the farming industry. The berm that Martin Marietta Materials plans to install around the perimeter of the property will do very little to reduce the visual impact and will have no impact on my other concerns. Our outdoor activity in our backyard will be greatly affected due to potential air and sound pollutions and always being on guard for violations of air standards due to the proximity of the proposed project. In other words, this makes us very nervous. We have seen the city of Fort Collins intervene in issues between Martin Marietta Materials and the neighboring residents. We are pro-business but there's a place for this heavy industrial process...it's just not here, adjacent to our quality of life. We respectfully ask that you deny this project. Paul and Sharon Markus 27711 Blackfoot Rd Johnstown, Colorado 80534 (970) 310-6516 psmarkus@lpbroadband.net 2 Case # USR 15-0027 For Public Record May 26, 2015 To: Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning_Services 1555 N 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Re: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development Weld County Commissioners: I live east of proposed plant location in the Coyote Ridge Subdivision on Coyote Ridge Lane. We are VERY OPPOSED to the Martin Marietta Plant going into the proposed location on Highway 34. Here are a few of the reasons why: ' t 1. Emergency 911 response vehicles will be delayed at multiple railroad crossing and could cost a life with the wait time. As a former paramedic and my wife a former police officer, this is a major concern for our family as well as others it would impact. 2. The many different airborne pollutants have been proven to cause difficulty breathing, possibly leading to asthma and/or cancer. As an asthmatic I'm greatly concerned of the impact having Martin Marietta next door could cause on my health. I bought in an agricultural area to avoid these health concerns. 3. I understand the purpose of their company, but I don't think this is the right location for an industrial plant. There are other industrial areas that would welcome Martin Marietta. We ask that you please take our concerns into consideration along with all the surrounding neighbors. it sounds to me as though they have other options for their plant to operate from within the Weld County district which are already zoned commercial. I STRONGLY URGE YOU TO MOVE THEM TO THAT LOCATION AND NOT ALLOW MARTIN MARIETTA ON HWY 34! Sincerely,cru1JO1& J ' iSt1/4- Q0Ma_J Johnson (970) 567-3333 EXHIBIT Case # USR 15-W27 For Public Record May 26, 2015 To: Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Re: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development Weld County Commissioners: I live east of proposed plant location in the Coyote Ridge Subdivision on Coyote Ridge Lane. We are VERY OPPOSED to the Martin Marietta Plant going into the proposed location on Highway 34. Here are a few of the reasons why: 1. We bought land in the country so we would have a certain standard of living that is not offered with living in town: quiet days and nights, lower traffic, and clean air. All these things would be greatly affected by the Martin Marietta plant. 2. Our children attend school in the Johnstown public school system. The bus picks them up on County Road 15 and Coyote Ridge Lane. As it stands now, the bus passes over the two sets of rail road tracks 6 times between our house and the school Both morning and afternoon. That's even taking into account the number of other times the bus driver goes over those tracks for other routes or while picking up other children on County Road 13. 1t would have a MAJOR impact on the bus system ! There are dozens of children on the "rural route." Our children should not have to sit on the bus an extra 30-45 minutes while waiting for a train. And by the sounds of it, this would be an everyday nuisance. 3. We are also very concerned about the health aspect. While Martin Marietta may argue this point, we feel there is no way this can be good for anyone living within a ten mile radius of the plant. Nor can it be sustainable for the crop growing in the area, which would also have a direct impact on us. The soot that would be floating through the air is left on our agriculture, our homes, and in our animals and children's lungs. A thought we lose sleep over at night. 4. We have a beautiful view of the mountains and the Martin Marietta plant would greatly destroy this view that we paid for. We bought where we did because all around is agricultural and we want it to stay that way. This area was never designed to have this huge commercial plant operating in the area_ We ask that you please take our concerns into consideration along with all the surrounding neighbors. It sounds to me as though they have other options for their plant to operate from within the Weld County district which are already zoned commercial. I STRONGLY URGE YOU TO MOVE THEM TO THAT LOCATION AND NOT ALLOW MARTIN MARIETTA ON HWY 34! Sincer Chelsey Johnsdn (970) 567-3334 EXHIBIT Diana Aungst From: Men Aab [wirenut56@reagan.com] Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 8:42 AM To: Diana Aungst Subject: MMM highway 34 Allen Aab 6790 Commanche Ct Loveland CO 80534 Email wirenut56 rea an.com Good Morning Martin Marietta, Will since I'm writing this that means that this is not in your back yard, but now it's in our front yard. 2 years ago we built a courtyard in our front yard with a fire pit looking over the lush green fields with beautiful view of the mountains in the back ground with the smell of clean fresh air and the birds singing in the back ground and the wild life. Well there goes another train you can hear the whistle blowing you can see the traffic starting to back up on highway 34. I take it you have never tried to get on highway 34 around 8 or 9 o'clock in the morning when there is a train. If you drive down country road 15 south from hwy 34 there are 2 sets of train tracks they are so rough now we can't Imagine how they will be with a lot more train travel on them. Not to mention more truck traffic on the country roads trying to turn on highway 34 and all of the extra rocks on the roads from spillage over loading the trucks and what gets stuck in the truck tires at the loading place and more broken window shields. We don't want to sit out at night and listen to the trains horn blowing and the trains bucking all night long. Trains were made to go in a straight line not in a circle, the wheels will be screaming all the time on the tracks, not to mention the backup alarms on the heavy equipment and the street lights and the other noise coming from conveyor belt. What about the TOXIC fumes coming from the plant my wife has Asthma we won't be able to leave the windows open because of all of the dirt and dust and the toxic fumes. We don't need heavy Industrial in our front yard. take this site over to Windsor or Milliken or one of the other sites. Thank You Allen Aab CONSIDER MOVING IT SOME WHERE ELSE. EXHIBIT 1 I n Case # USR15-0027, for Public Record May 28, 2015 Weld County Commissioners: c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N . 17th Ave. Greeley, Colorado USA 80631 RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027 : Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development Weld County Commissioners, I am strongly opposed to the Martin Marietta asphalt plant. This project is not compatible with our lovely neighborhood. This terrible project would change our lives in so many negative ways We purchased this beautiful little piece of Colorado in 1985, shortly after highway 34 was made into a four lane highway. We raised our boys here and have loved walking and biking all over this lovely valley for thirty years. It has been such a blessing to be in a rural setting and teach our boys to love this country life. Since the day we moved into our home, we have worked tirelessly to improve our property and my retirement has brought me even closer to our land with gardening and relaxing outside. After twenty years of working with special education children, I wanted to make the most of my retirement by enjoying the things I love. Most of these revolve around my home. I have three German shepherd dogs that are always in our back yard. This horrendous plant would totally change my life and I am very upset that it is even being considered because the location is totally wrong. There has never been an asphalt plant built within an established neighborhood of people and it certainly should not start with this pollution belching plant. There are so many alternative sites that would make more sense. Martin Marietta has told us that our area was not suitable for this plant but was their best one financially. This is totally unfair to all of us that have lived here for years. Our area is growing with shopping centers, hospitals and businesses and that brings new neighborhoods, but NOT INDUSTRIAL. I resent terribly the fact that these companies think they can just jam this down our throats. The traffic is already a nightmare on 34 and just the present number of trains backs traffic up for miles both ways. There are many accidents and stop and go driving now. These asphalt plants should be put in places that are not as busy as our area and where the public is protected from the terrible odors and cancer risks. We have all been here before them and WE DON'T WANT THEM HERE. Martin Marietta has told us many untrue things that now are being changed to even more trucks, more noise, more dust, more lights, more pollutants. Their regard for this neighborhood is transparently laughable. EXHIBIT I am not opposed to growth in any way, but I am vehemently opposed to crazy wrong growth. The proposed hours of operation are 24 hours/7 days a week and 365 days a year. This would be unbearable because our bedroom windows face the proposed area. This is absolutely not compatible with our community. Industrial use would bastardize the rich history of farms, dating back before the Civil War. I desperately ask your protection from the total ruination of my life and health . I am in between this proposed plant and Highway 34. The diesel from up to two thousand trucks gearing up and down from Highway 34 south to the asphalt plant constantly passing my house 365 days per year would endanger my family's health. I am attaching the American Cancer Society web page on the known results of exposure to diesel exhaust. It is not a possibility, it is a proven fact. I ask, once again, to protect me from my country life being stolen and my retirement made into a nightmare, This is the most blatant attempt to make a lot of money while ruining so many people's lives I have ever witnessed. Please put a stop to this. Sincerley, Barbara J. Moe -cigetAi-tiA,L,y. cnoLea.,. 1209 N . County Line Rd . Johnstown, Co. USA 80534 This information was taken from the American Cancer Society webpage, very insightful. http.fiwww.cancer .orgjcancer/cancercauses/othercarcinog,ens/pollution/diesel -exhaust What expert agencies say Several national and international agencies study substances in the environment to determine if they can cause cancer. The American Cancer Society looks to these organizations to evaluate the risks based on evidence from laboratory, animal, and human research studies. Some of these expert agencies have classified diesel exhaust as to whether it can cause cancer, based largely on the possible link to lung cancer. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) is part of the World Health Organization (WHO). Its major goal is to identify causes of cancer. IARC classifies diesel engine exhaust as "carcinogenic to humans," based on sufficient evidence that it is linked to an increased risk of lung cancer, as well as limited evidence linking it to an increased risk of bladder cancer. The National Toxicology Program (NTP) is formed from parts of several different US government agencies, including the National Institutes of Health (NIH ), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the Food and Drug Administration ( FDA). The NTP has classified exposure to diesel exhaust particulates as "reasonably anticipated to be a human carcinogen," based on limited evidence from studies in humans and supporting evidence from lab studies. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) maintains the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS), an electronic database that contains information on human health effects from exposure to various substances in the environment. The EPA classifies diesel exhaust as "likely to be carcinogenic to humans." The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH ) is part of the CDC that studies exposures in the workplace. NIOSH has determined that diesel exhaust is a "potential occupational carcinogen!' Does diesel exhaust cause any other health problems? Diesel exhaust is a major part of outdoor air pollution. Diesel exhaust is believed to play a role in other health problems, such as eye irritation, headache, asthma and other lung diseases, heart disease, and possibly immune system problems. Can I reduce my exposure to diesel exhaust? Diesel exhaust can cause several health problems and can most likely increase the risk of lung cancer (and possibly other cancers), so it makes sense to lower your exposure to it whenever possible. However, since most people's exposure comes from exhaust near highways and other roads, government regulations may be more effective in limiting exposure than individual choices. jwOom MART1NHOMES RECEIVED WWW . MARTINHOMESLLC . COM MAY 2 7 2015 Case # USR 15-0027 For Public Record WELD COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Date: 5-25-15 To: Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development Weld County Commissioners, I am reaching out to express my austere concerns with the proposed special use permit USR15-0027. Although there are many concerns I have with this proposed use: property value decline, noise, dust, vibration from increased train usage, pollution, etc. The number one issue I see with this proposal is that it does not comply with the County's Comprehensive Plan for this area. I live in Coyote Ridge PUD which is about a mile away from this proposed site. Why would Weld County approve multiple subdivisions and residential housing in an area and than after houses are built, approve a heavy industrial use plant right next door? This 24/7 proposed operation needs to be located in an Industrial Area, not in the back yards of residential neighborhoods. I own a custom home building company and have been building in Weld County for over ten years. I understand smart development, planning, zoning and construction costs. I recently read a letter that was sent to the Commissioners from the Northern Colorado HBA (Exhibit 53). This letter states that: "This project will help control the escalating housing costs." I can state that there is no a proof that a new concrete and asphalt plant will lower housing costs. I feel these statements are misleading. Housing costs have escalated because of many variables. Supply and demand is the main driver of costs. In Northern Colorado we have a booming economy right now and houses were not being built for years during the great recession. Furthermore new ground was not developed. Lot and land prices have increased dramatically because there are not many building lots left. Oil and Gas business has been great for Weld County but hard on homebuilders as it created quite a labor shortage for EXHIBIT 1 -lb skilled workers. Many sub contractors got out of home building during the recession as there was no work. Sub contractors have raised their prices substantially over the last three years. Factors that have increased housing prices: Land costs, water costs (tap fees and raw water) permit fee increases from most jurisdictions, new energy code cost increases, General Liability Insurance for Homebuilders much higher due to new laws passed, drywall increases, paint increases, shingle price increases, concrete price increases, labor and subcontractor pricing increases, plumbing and electrical materials increases, flooring increases. Most of these all have to do with supply and demand. If a sub can charge more for his work and get that price than they will. Adding another concrete and asphalt plant to this area will not lower the price of cement, asphalt, Or lower housing costs. I understand there may be a need for a new plant but it needs to be built in an Industrial Zoned Area, that will not negatively impact its neighbors and citizens. I am urging the commissioners to look at this project and not approve it due to its lack of meeting the county's comprehensive plan for this area. Regards . 1 rew Martin wner Martin Homes, LLC 27128 Coyote Ridge Ln Johnstown CO 80534 amartin@martinhomesllc.com Diana Aungst From: Sue Eggspuehler[hopeeggs@yahoo.com] Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 11:28 AM To: Diana Aungst Subject: Totally against proposed Asphalt Plant's location! Weld County Commissioners; I am a resident of Loveland, Co for the past 41 years. I have raised my 3 children in Loveland and have always felt we live in a beautiful exceptional area of this country. I am totally against the possible placement of this Martin Marietta asphalt plant! This possible change in zoning from agricultural to unspecified heavy industrial is totally incompatible with housing that already exists in Johnstown and close proximity to other housing in this area! Not to mention huge increases in massive truck traffic on Hwy 34 already extremely overcrowded by traffic! The huge increase in air pollutants, dust, and devastating levels of noise simply do not make sense and will destroy this area! There is plenty of open space in Weld County that probably is already zoned as industrial! We as Northern Colorado residents need to take into account the impact to all towns, Johnstown, Windsor, Greeley, Loveland, Milliken, Ft. Collins, etc. Let's protect selective areas that are residential or agricultural yet adjacent to residential to remain compatible with present zoning and stay residential! I presently have a grown married daughter about to have their first baby and house hunting in the area! She was interested in Johnstown and with this looming disastrous Asphalt Plant threat she will be looking more West of l- 25 if it goes through! I realize Martin Marietta is a huge corporation and has all sorts of legal and possible political pull, but please review the impact you will be thrusting on homeowners in the area, pollution concerns and massive truck traffic in this area! Please turn this zoning change down and there are lots of other industrial zoned areas in Weld county that could be options. Thank you for your time! A very concerned long time N Co resident! Sincerely, Susanne Eggspuehler 3502 Florida Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Hopee49s(ayahoo.com Sent from my iPhone EXHIBIT 1 11 R ECF!VVF May 20, 2015 MAY 28 2015 Jaime Cummings Weld County Planning uepiflnwen[ 26700 Weld County Road #13 GREELEY OFFICE Johnstown, CO 80534 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst,AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 North 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Case#USR 15-0027 FOR PUBLIC RECORD I am in COMPLETE OPPOSITION to the proposed Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development plan. I live 400 yards south of the proposed development. The project will have a very large impact on the quality of the life I currently enjoy in this neighborhood,which is my home. I live on 96 acres in my dream home that my husband and I built 7 years ago. We farm our property in wheat and corn and are surrounded by other individuals that farm and care about the land. These are all good neighbors with a vested stake in our community. I am concerned that this proposed development will impact every aspect of life that I enjoy to the fullest in our community. Those concerns are: -NOISE: Our area is so quiet that you can hear people's conversations 1/2 mile away. The combination of all the noise levels brought on with the Martin Marietta Materials asphalt/concrete/aggregate plant from truck traffic, processing of the materials at the plant,back up alarms,heavy conveyor belt operations, idling trucks, heavy equipment operations,train operations, unloading and loading operations, is unfathomable. I will no longer be able to enjoy the peace and quiet that comes from living in the country. - HOURS OF OPERATION: This is a quiet rural neighborhood. It's so quiet you notice the quiet. We hear nature here,which is good for your soul. The proposed plant operation of 7 days a week/24 hours a day/365 days a year is extremely intrusive. This is an area where people live in a residential atmosphere which IS NOT COMPATIBLE WITH AN INDUSTRIAL PRESENCE. - GOOD NEIGHBOR BEHAVIOR: This is not"good neighbor"behavior as Martin Marietta Material suggests. We are the ones that have treasured and cared for this area. Why would you punish the approximately 300 households that currently surround this proposed development? This PRIME farmland in our community has been farmed for over 100 years. RESPECT THAT-WE DO. Our neighbors have EXHIBIT restored and improved older structures here for the better,we have built high end homes here, people planned to live the remainder of their lives here intending to enjoy our quiet rural setting, The Martin Marietta Materials plant will dramatically scar this area and will forever change what we have. -TRAFFIC: My driveway is on WCR13, again 400 yards from the proposed plant. With the initial 1,129 vehicle trips a day reported by MMM to be using the road I access everyday, I worry about access out of my home, my safety and the safety of my family as we deal with the high risk of using our road with this amount of truck traffic. Then over time the number of vehicle trips will almost double per Martin Marietta Materials. THIS IS NOT COMPATIBLE. THIS IS A HIGH RISK ISSUE to myself and all of us who use this road. We have bikers, equestrians and farmers who use WCR 13. This road cannot accommodate this truck traffic and neighborhood traffic. In closing, I have never seen a complimentary mix of industrial use and residential homes in a neighborhood. It is always visually unappealing,and gives the appearance of very poor planning. Thank you, Ja me umming Diana Aungst Subject: FW: Proposed Asphalt Plant Original Message From: Robert Smith [mailto:wordsmiff(a msn.com] Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 9:08 AM To: Tom Parko Jr. Subject: Proposed Asphalt Plant Sir: I believe that the proposed location for the,asphalt plant is poorly considered. If I were a homeowner in the community Northeast of the proposed site, I would be very concerned about the dust and smell. The prevailing winds are south- southwest during the summer months (when residents would most likely want to be outside enjoying their yards and such) and to have that smell of asphalt with your BBQ. Not very appetizing, and the dust from the cement would make for gritty burgers. In addition, the year round dust would be carried into the homes, and could additionally cause medical issues for the residents. While I am all for adding industry to help the tax base, the location is not good with the existing neighborhood just the the Northeast. I suggest helping MM find a better location along 34. Why not create an industrial site on the North side of 34 such as the NE corner of 34 and CR 17. There is rail there, and little else. The prevailing winds would not be a problem there. Regards, Robert L. Smith Johnstown EXHIBIT Diana Aungst From: JD Tennal [jdtennal@msn.comj Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 2:18 PM To: Diana Aungst Subject: Case# 15-0027 Case #ASR 15-0027 For Public Record May 21, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst ,AICP, CFM Planner II 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 This project is so incompatible with the existing neighborhood. The question is who stands to benefit from it. Surely not any of the two hundred home owners in this area and not any of the Commuters from Weld or Larimer counties who travel on Hwy 34. Weld County will gain nothing by the location of this site as twelve of the site choices are in Weld County. The only ones to gain from this are Martin Marietta and Gerrard as they can team together to under bid on the l- 25 and Hwy 34 expansion project. Weld County has a major gravel pit on Hwy 66 and Weld County has a cement plant on CR-13 and Hwy 402. We do not need another plant at this site. The pollution, noise and odor are major concerns for us home ownei Good development is on the Larimer County side of Hwy 13 along Hwy 34 with the building of homes, apartme commercial business and rehab centers. Why Does Weld County want to put an asphalt operation plant and oil transfer station right on the busy 34 entrance into Weld County? Development along Hwy 34 is coming but a h industrial plant right next to an established subdivision with homes that are in the four hundred to eight hundr dollar price range is not a wise decision. This project will not benefit our home owners or Weld County. Please deny this project as it is not a good plan. Dale and Joyce Tennal 27690 Blackfoot Rd Johnstown, Colorado 80534 (970) 461-9076 IdtennalPmsn.com EXHIBIT 1 1 74 Case # USR 15-0027 MAY 2 9 2015 i For Public Record Veld County r�dn�ll��e GREELEY OFFICE Date May 26 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner11 Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greely, Colorado 80631 Weld County Commissioners Re: Planning Application Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development. This letter is in response to the MMM highway 34 development. Our address is 27775 Blackfoot Road Johnstown, Colorado 80534 ( Indianhead Estates) First Thank you for taking the time to read our response. I am not sure if you have every been to Indianhead Estates or not , please take the time to visit our small slice of heaven as we refer to it. We have some what we feel are major concerns relating to the quality of life, impact this would have. Take the time to sit on your porch listen to the birds, see the rabbits, foxes, (this is what we hear and see each day) this is why we moved to this rural area. As you do then imagine hearing train cars, trucks, vibrations, back up alarms of heavy equipment at all hours of the day and night 365 days a year. ( plus many more sounds that are very different then our neighbor hood is used to.) Would you like to have to listen to this each day. As you and your family are out side enjoying the great Colorado out doors. This last 2 weeks my family, children, grandchildren and friends watched as a family of 7 fox pups played at one of the sheds in our neighbor hood. With increase noise from the truck traffic and train traffic and other EXHIBIT i � 5 noise pollutions do you think they will come back to our piece of heaven? I wanted to give you a small example of our wonderful life at our home. We come home to relax and enjoy what we have worked so hard for. As we are sure. Our concerns are like all of our neighbors . -Noise. All hours of the day and night 24/7 365 days a year. -Hugh safety concerns with major increase of traffic. -Pollution dust ( please look into the health risk from silica dust (concert) -light pollutions 24/7 365 days a year. -Orders they even say it smells why is that ok? will we be able to sit on our patio and have our breakfast , lunch and dinner any more. - They say they want to be part of our community and a good neighbor. How can that be when some of the original things I was personnel told at the January meeting are not of any value now as they have changed, also how can Martin Marietta claim this is a good fit for our area. 1 of 12 sites and as a company you would choose to down grade our quality of life forever. Ask yourselves, why put this where so many lives will be impacted in a negative manner. Again Thank you for your time and concentration of this most important matter. Ronald L Svoboda v ' Linda L Groff Llgroff@live.com Please feel free to let me know you have received this letter, And if you need any other information let us know. RFC,F' Vr 741 May 22, 2015 MAY 2 9 2015 Weld County Flaniitng ueparuuent GREELEY OFFICE Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to elicit your support of the proposed Martin Marietta operations site near Hwy 34 and CR 13. While I'm sure Johnstown residents and others "don't want this in their backyard," I feel this site is crucial to the well-being and economic stability of Northern Colorado. We live in a fast-growing area of the nation, and with that comes the need to maintain our transportation infrastructure, support our construction industry, and provide raw materials necessary to live in a thriving, clean, and functional community. Building materials (for roads, bridges, parking lots, homes and commercial buildings) are necessary to our community. The proximity of the rail to this site will not only reduce the need for trucking, but lessen the environmental impacts of those trucks. This facility will employ 100+ employees directly, with high-paying primary jobs, and will indirectly employ thousands of residents in supporting jobs throughout the region. Martin Marietta will be a good stweard of this property, and has a track record of working with residents to come to compromises wherever possible to keep a healthy relationship with their neighbors. Please support this project. Northern Colorado needs it. Sincerely, Laurie Steele Windsor, CO 80528 970-495-1791 EXHIBIT I Diana Aungst From: Leonard Leinweber[leinsweb@Ipbroadband.net] Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2015 7:40 PM To: Diana Aungst Subject: Proposed Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development Case# USR 15-0027 For Public Record May 31, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 970-353-6100 ext. 3524; Fax: 970-304-6498; daungst@weldgov.com Weld County Commissioners: EXHIBIT I _Tr RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development Indianhead Estates was established in 1978 and I have been a resident since 1989, 25 years. Over the years realtors have sung the following praises about the community in which I live: "Not just a home - a lifestyle." "Comfortable Country Elegance!" "Spectacular rural setting!!" 1 "privacy, but also have a wonderful neighborhood" "Quiet neighborhood" "magnificent views of the Rocky Mountains and Colorado Plains." "You will feel like you are on vacation in your own backyard." "Stunning country Home with a Mountain view that will take your breath away!" "Indianhead Estates is a unique community." "Very Established Neighborhood!" "space around you and incredible views." "Desirable location!" "Dreams do come true." If the above planning application for Martin Marietta to build a concrete and asphalt plant is approved, what do you think people will then say about my beloved community. I would hazard to guess it would be something more like: Grotesque country living with a magnificent view of large, heavy industry surrounded by a railroad. Enjoy toxic fumes that will take your breath away (and maybe even your life); continual dust; non-stop truck, train and machinery noise; insomnia; traffic congestion and deterioration of road infrastructure; diesel odors; ground vibrations; light pollution; devaluation of property; loss of wildlife; and just plain visual ugliness. In my opinion, Martin Marrietta will NOT be a good "NEIGHBOR." I strongly oppose the proposed construction of the Martin Marietta Concrete and Asphalt Plant (Reference PRE 14-0322) and ask you to reject their application. Respectfully, Judy Leinweber 27823 Blackfoot Road leinsweb@lpbroadband.net 2 Diana Aungst From: Leonard Leinweber[leinsweb@Ipbroadband.netj Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2015 1:10 PM To: Diana Aungst Subject: Martin Marietta Highway 34 Development Case# USR 15-0027 For Public Record May 29 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 970-353-6100 ext. 3524; Fax: 970-304-6498 daungstaweldgov.com Weld County Commissioners: RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development As I understand it, the frame work for this project would require consideration to ensure that the uses be established and operated in a manner that is COMPATIBLE with the existing land uses in the neighborhood. Also, the standards for applicable uses should be designed to protect and promote health, safety, convenience and general welfare of the present and future residents of the county. By virtue of the fact that Indianhead Estates and the surrounding residential areas have existed since 1970 and before, should preclude the proposed development or any other heavy industrial development. The production of asphalt and concrete would deteriorate air quality even though they claim it would operate within state standards. My car operates within state standards but it still pollutes. What about odor? What about dust suppression? Noise is a huge issue. Once again they claim they would operate within daytime state standards but may occasionally exceed the night time limit. That helps very little since the standards were developed to regulate how a business may operate, not to make believe they are noise free. US 34 traffic is already a nightmare. Thousands of heavy truck trips per day will be added to an already overloaded highway system. Who pays for the improvements that should be done before development of any kind? Last but certainly not least is the visual impact of heavy industry butted up against an old established residential neighborhood and the effects of the industrial lighting on the neighborhood. Heavy industry should never be allowed right next door to a housing development; especially next to a housing development that has existed for over 40 years. I believe that zoning laws exist to prevent just this sort of thing. I implore you not to approve the rezoning request by Martin Marietta. Sincerely, EXHIBIT Leonard L. Leinweber I 27823 Blackfoot Road Johnstown, CO. 80534 leinsweblpbroadband.net 1 Diana Aungst From: Wolfgang Dirks [wolfdirks@earthlink.net] Sent: Monday, June 01, 2015 8:00 AM EXHIBIT To: Diana Aungst Subject: Case# USR-15-0027 Attachments: USGS.pdf Dear Diana Aungst, Since my last letter to you in February, I reviewed in detail Martin Marietta Material's application and found no evidence that this development is compatible with our existing neighborhood and environment. Throughout the application they claim to be neighborly and therefor compatible by abiding by the EPA emission standards and Weld County's noise restrictions for industrial sites. In their January open house, they clearly did not listen to our many concerns regarding dust,odor,noise, pollution, traffic,visual impacts and overall compatibility. It looks like they just proceeded to have their "experts" write their reports without becoming familiar with our beautiful and very quiet neighborhood, which has existed that way for over 35 years. On May 21,they invited us to another meeting on June 9 where they want to rehash the content of their application and have a"facilitated" discussion with the neighbors. They claim that this additional meeting was requested by Weld County. We have encouraged them to meet with our Inter neighborhood committee,which represents over 200 people, beforehand to mitigate our extensive incompatibilities;but, so far they have refused to meet with the committee members. Three years ago I built my retirement home,which is less than 500' from the proposed development boundary, for over $600,000 in the newer Indianhead West neighborhood and have enjoyed its peaceful environment, clean air, and great neighbors ever since. I would have never built my home here, if I had known that I could someday live next to such an environmental eyesore like the proposed MMM asphalt and cement plant with a rail loop only 600' from my house. According to Weld County's Department of Planning Services Mission Statement: "To ensure that land use and land development are consistent with adopted codes so that quality of life and property values are maintained for County residents, businesses and property owners through response to citizen concern" MMM's proposed facility WILL impact our quality of life and our property values. In their proposal, MMM concedes that the compatibility with our neighborhood is rated as 0 (zero). Furthermore, MMM states, "the idea of living near an asphalt plant scares many people". Recently, a potential buyer in the Indianhead West neighborhood backed out of the contract because they found out about the MMM application. Additionally, two new owners and one builder,who were never told about the MMM proposal before closing,are now very concerned about it. Next I will try to address my concerns and point out the negative impacts on our community in several sections of the MMM application: 1.Air Emissions: As stated before, MMM claims that as long as the emissions and odors are less than the EPA permits,they are compatible to our neighborhood. In realty,they are completely incompatible to our current emission and dust free environment. The only odors we have in our neighborhood is from the occasional family or neighborhood barbecue. i I'm 71 years old and have constricted sinuses due to a previous accident. The concrete dust and fumes generated by this facility will most likely increase my breathing problem. Additionally, I'm very concerned that the concrete dust containing crystalline silica could also cause additional health problems: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11494340 2. Benefits: The material, financial, and job benefits are the same for any MMM development site within Weld County. 3. Compliance: On page 6 they actually agree that many people are scared by this development by stating "the idea of living near an asphalt plant scares many people as they have concerns that it smells bad, impact their health, and damage their organic gardens and farms". 3. Noise: Weld County Noise Ordinance Sec. 14-9-10. Intent and applicability: A. It is hereby declared to be the intent of the Board of County Commissioners to protect the citizens of the County from excessive, unreasonable and unnecessary noise. I have made multiple noise measurements from the front porch of my house with an Extech 407735 sound meter during daytime and nighttime hours. During the day my readings ranged from 45db to 49db and at night the readings ranged from 35db to 39db. MMM considers the Highway 34 site to be industrial, which is allowed to generate 80db of noise during the daytime and 75db at night. This means that my perceived loudness level would increase over 8 times during the daytime and over 12 times at night. MMM's proposed berms will NOT reduce any sound, because, according to USGS (see attached drawing),the MMM plants are at an elevation of 4905'to 4915' and their 10' berms near the plants are at 4915'to 4920'. The main floor in my home on Apache Road is at 4945'. So, at my height, my line of sight and sound of 4951' is at least 20' over the top of the berms and I will hear all the noise and see all the activity from the asphalt and cement plants day and night. According to the USGS data, houses in Indianhead Estates have a base elevation as high as 4990', 75' to 85' above the plant site. Additionally, many houses have elevated outside decks, looking right over the berms at this proposed environmental eyesore. Obviously, MMM's "experts" never considered the elevation changes in their useless sound and visual mitigation attempt with berms. MMM completely failed to address the extreme noise and vibrations from the rail loop, which is within 600' of my house and will occur day and night. Due to the tight turns on the rail loop, wheel squeal can generate an additional 80db of very annoying wide frequency noise as explained in this Acoustics 2004 article: http://www.acoustics.asn.au/conference proceedings/AAS2004/ACOUSTIC/PDF/AUTHOR/AC040095.PDF . Additionally, up to 117 rail cars will generate a lot of loud coupling and grinding noises and ground vibrations during the starting and stopping process for transloading each of the 117 rail car. The wheel squeal and other shrill train noises should be a violation of the Colorado State Code. In its opening sentence (25-12-103-1) on Maximum Permissible Noise Level it states: (1) "Every activity in which this article is applicable shall be conducted in a manner so that any noise produced is not objectionable due to intermittence, beat frequency, or shrillness". MMM states that "this is the way they have been operating their ready mix and asphalt plants facility off 35th Avenue near Greeley and it has worked well for all involved." So, now MMM compares our unique 35 year old 2 neighborhood to North Greeley where the low cost prefabricated houses were built AFTER the MMM plants existed and their is no rail loop with a high truck bridge over the rail tracks. 4. Traffic: MMM claims that their selected site has low impact on county roads. So, instead they are going to significantly impact a very busy thoroughfare like Hwy 34, which is especially busy in the early morning hours when MMM expects to have the most truck traffic. But they will also impact nearby county roads, because the 465 trucks per day trying to enter Hwy 34 from CR13 will create a long waiting line on CR 13 and, instead of waiting very long,the trucks will most likely exit the MMM site South onto CR 13 toward CR 402. According to a local truck driver, fully loaded semis take up to a 1/2 mile to reach 65 mph on a level road. He also told me that when he accelerates East from CR 13 the truck does not reach 65 mph until CR 15 due to the Hwy 34 incline toward the East. So, due to the short acceleration lane of only 300' to the East, the trucks will merge into traffic at very low speeds. The acceleration lane toward the West is 2000'; so, again,trucks will merge into traffic at less than 65 mph. Therefor,465 additional trucks per day will most likely impact traffic and reduce safety near the CR13 intersection on Hwy 34. I have personally observed trucks waiting on CR 13 to cross or enter Hwy 34 to the west and, after waiting several minutes, the trucks simply proceeded to cross Hwy 34 expecting the traffic to slow down for them and potentially causing accidents. The same applies for trucks trying to enter CR13 from the East. So until there is a signal light,this intersection may become a real hazard. Of course,more signal lights on a busy 65 mph highway will also slow down the traffic flow significantly. MMM only refers to the traffic impact for the CR 13 and Hwy 34 intersection in their application. Some time ago,CDOT determined that the I-25 and Hwy 34 exchange will be overloaded in a few years. The many additional trucks from the MMM site will most likely overload that intersection immediately. MMM also does not address the additional impact of their train traffic across Hwy 34, which will create long delays to motorists and emergency services. 5. Site Selection: Out of the 13 possible sites along the rail line. MMM's selected site#2 and they rated it 0 (zero) with respect to neighbors,which clearly states that it is not compatible with the many neighbors surrounding the site. Since most of their raw materials are coming from Wyoming, MMM should build their plant North of Hwy 34 along the rail line and away from existing neighborhoods. The Kodak site in Windsor would be an appropriate site, because it already has a rail loop, is rated industrial and is far away from any neighborhoods. MMM intends to operate the plants 24 hours a day,but does not address the problem of light pollution from the buildings,parking areas, trucks and trains at night. After dark,I currently look out over a dark open field with the stars and the occasional full moon above. It would be very annoying to see bright lights all night long from the MMM facilities,the trucks climbing over the rail loop and the bright lights from the diesel locomotives on the rail loop. When you travel on Hwy 34 past I-25 you are surrounded by upscale stores, shopping centers like Centerra, hospitals, banks, and fine restaurants. Currently this is a great gateway into Weld County and Greeley;but, If this industrial development along with Environtech's industrial rezoning happens,this area will most likely 3 become heavy industrial with no upscale commercial or residential development like the mixed land use Hwy 85 corridor. In summary,the MMM application document is very repetitive using the same vague arguments about being neighborly in the different sections: As long as they abide by Weld County's and the EPA's general neighborhood legal limitations,they consider this development neighborly and compatible without any regard to our longtime quiet, oder and dust free neighborhood. We do not have the extensive legal and public relation resources like MMM and Environtech. So, we must rely on our elected Weld County officials to help protect our neighborhood and environment. Weld County Planners and Commissioners, please reject this absolutely incompatible Martin Marietta Materials application. Thank you Wolfgang Dirks 6825 Apache Road, Indianhead West Estates 4 Diana Aungst From: Karl Scott[kscott1325@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, June 01, 2015 9:58 AM To: Diana Aungst Subject: Planning Application USR 15-0027 Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development Case#USR 15-0027 For Public Record Dated: May 10, 2015 Weld County Commissioners C/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 970-353-6100 ext 3524: Fax: 970-304-6498 daun$st@weld,gsv.com Weld County Commissioners: RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development This operation at 300 feet from my home would have a direct effect with: • Noise train whistle • Vibration • Airborne dust • The ability to get proper sleep for my livelihood(DOT Requirement for CDL Drivers ) • Complete lack of compatibility • The wheel noise from cars making the curve EXHIBIT • Massive increase of train whistle use 1 _30_ 1 A 24/7 operation with train whistles going off, not comparable or compatible Vibration from engines and cars within app 300 feet of my house not compatible Airborne dust from dry aggregate will affect outdoor activities Ability to get a good night sleep (prime reason to move here for the quite)to meet DOT (I'm a CDL Driver Hazmat) requirements to arrive rested not fatigued for work. My livelihood is at risk. The change from agriculture to a full blown commercial plant is not comparable or compatible. Sleep/noise issues from the wheels squealing and grinding around the curve in front of the house. The whistles and banging of rail cars will be much greater than the quite we have now. Please do not turn this area into a Commerce City industrial like mess. Karl E. Scott 27640 Hopi Trail Loveland, Colorado 80534 kscott1325@gmail.com 2 RFC .e!VF MEMO JUN 012015 Weld County Planning ueparunent GREELEY OFFICE To: Weld County Commissioners Fr: Kelly Steele Ad: 8454 Spinnaker Bay Dr. Windsor, Co. 80528 Da: May 28, 2015 Re: Martin Marietta project on Hwy 34 (USR15-0027) Dear Ms. Aungst, Weld County Planning and Weld County Commissioners: I am writing in support of the new operations proposed by Martin Marietta located off Weld County Road 13. This operations site will not only employ 100 people, but this will indirectly create thousands of jobs in the region. It will generate significant sales and property tax, and will help bring in much-needed raw materials to support the construction industry and our transportation infrastructure. Because of the proximity to rail, this operation will have a smaller carbon footprint, reducing the need for as many trucks and keeping building costs more affordable. While some residents may "not want it in their back yard," this operations site will be a huge asset to the economic growth of our region, and will actually help reduce costs, transportation congestion, and vehicle emissions at the same time. I live and work in Northern Colorado, and I support initiatives that will keep our economy strong and stable. I urge you to support Martin Marietta's project...they are a good corporate citizen, a caring employer, and have the best interests of Northern Colorado at heart. Respectfully submitted, Steele 70-556-0120 Windsor, CO 80528 EXHIBIT I P FCE!VED JUN 012015 Welti County Harming ueparunenc Connie Carter GREELEY OFFICE 113 Flat Iron St. Severance CO, 80550 May 28, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing this letter to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over this proposed project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. Additionally, this project will indirectly create many jobs in the region and generate significant sales and property tax revenue for our county. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from this project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials from ever increasing distances. Additionally,the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site in lieu of large trucks. This will provide a local source of high quality materials while reducing the amount of trucks and their associated carbon foot print and added traffic congestion in our area. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, cly/ Connie Carter EXHIBIT I FrFrkftm RuI 012015 Ken Carter 113 Flat Iron St. Ngelu County Flaniiiiig uepaiunent GREELEY OFFICE Severance CO, 80550 May 28, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing this letter to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over this proposed project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. Additionally, this project will indirectly create many jobs in the region and generate significant sales and property tax revenue for our county. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from this project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials from ever increasing distances. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site in lieu of large trucks. This will provide a local source of high quality materials while reducing the amount of trucks and their associated carbon foot print and added traffic congestion in our area. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Ken Carter EXHIBIT 1 JUN 012015 CASE#USR 15-0027 Weld County Planning For Public Record GREELEY d OFFICE rodent May 26,2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst,AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley,CO 80631 RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development Dear Ms.Aungst: I am fairly sure you have received a number of correspondence regarding this issue already so I will keep this brief. I am not in support of building this proposed facility for many reasons, not just personal. I have reviewed the Weld County Code statements for Uses by Special Review. It seems clear to me that the proposal to build this facility does not meet the code requirements. I don't believe there is anything Martin Marietta could propose that would meet the requirements. This type of facility can and will cause great health,life,and safety issues. There are always risks involved with facilities like these and the owners simply cannot guarantee that these risks will not occur;a chance I personally would not be willing to take. The health factor is my greatest concern. This is also not the type of welcoming vision for persons to encounter when entering Weld County. The traffic patterns on highway 34 are already overwhelming. Many accidents occur in the stretch of highway between 125 and Highway 257. Additional truck traffic and additional train traffic would be detrimental to traffic flow and safety. There are important agricultural entities located in this area that will also be negatively impacted and I firmly believe we need to support our agriculture. It seems clear to me that the risks far outweigh the benefits,which are few if any,of having this facility located where requested. I implore you to consider the many negative impacts that this facility will bring to many Weld County residence,as well as all who travel the boundary roads of this facility. I do appreciate your time. Sincerely, /01..„6/7 David Skold 6737 Algonquin Drive Johnstown, CO 80534 970-663-2639 j5t_EXHIBIT CASE#USR 15-0027 ^ For Public Record -r May 26, 2015 JUN 012015 Weld County Commissioners Weld County Flaiiiihig uupd!uneu[ c/o Diana Aungst,AICP,CFM Planner II GREELEY OFFICE Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development Dear Ms.Aungst: As I read the sections under Weld County's Code regulations, Uses by Special Review Sec 23-2-200 Intent and applicability, I am particularly struck by one sentence"Therefore, Uses by Special Review are to ensure that whatever is considered is compatible with the neighborhood". I started writing this correspondence with the intention of stating how this new facility is in so many ways incompatible with the surrounding neighborhoods, homes, agriculture, businesses,traffic patterns,train patterns, human interactions, and wildlife. While I still want to state my beliefs on that it dawned on me that the issue really should be why is this facility compatible with aforementioned. I can't think of one reason why it is compatible albeit I am partial to not having it established. While it benefits Martin Marietta, I cannot think of one way it will benefit this Weld & Larimer counties community. I also noticed the codes state"Standards listed both herein and for applicable USES from any zone district, are designed to protect and promote the health,safety, convenience and general welfare of the present and future residences of the county.". As I read the codes I can see that this facility does not meet the requirements of the codes. There is no way that Martin Marietta can guarantee that there is adequate protection for the health,safety,and welfare of the people in the surrounding areas. While my husband and I live in the Indianhead Estates subdivision, our dear neighbors are what we consider to be the entire neighborhood which includes CR 13,CR 56, and CR 15. I believe if this project is permitted to go forth, it will have devastating consequences to our neighborhood as well as affect every aspect of our lives. This plant would drastically reduce our quality of living, not to mention greatly decrease the value of our home and property. Allowing this facility to be established in the middle of a neighborhood,which is essentially the request, is just not prudent. Please also consider the traffic dangers and congestion,along with additional road maintenance. Highway 34 is very congested at all times. It is extremely so during peak hours. Adding truck traffic and additional train traffic to an already overstressed travel route,well that alone is a great reason to not consider this proposal. Maintenance of the surrounding roadways would greatly need to increase. Traffic dangers on an already traffic-prone highway would certainly increase. This area is the gateway to Weld County on highway 34. I'm not sure that is how we all want to be represented. Toxic substances known to be associated with these types of facilities,even for minimal exposure, have been know to cause cancers, severe respiratory issues,and birth defects;toxins such as hydrogen sulfide, benzene,chromium,formaldehyde, Polycyclic aromatic Hydrocarbons—a group of over 100 chemicals—I have no doubt that this is just scratching the surface. I would greatly appreciate you seriously considering approving this project as it seems to go against many statements in Weld County's own code statements. I have not spoken to one individual in the entire community who supports this idea. I do greatly appreciate your time and consideration as I realize this must be a very difficult decision for you. Sincerely, 4-• 45- Ellen Skold EXHIBIT 6737 Algonquin Drive Johnstown,CO 80534 970-663-2639 gPCE!VED JUN 012015 Pamela Thomas vVeld County Planning „eparunent GREELEY OFFICE 6242 Valley Vista Ave. Firestone, CO 80504 May 29, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst(USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17`h Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways,which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally,the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Pamela Thomas EXHIBIT RECEIVED JUN 02 2015 Weld County Planning Department GREELEY OFFICE Christopher& Brooke Benson 1028 Banyan Court Loveland, CO 80538 May 2, 2015 Weld County Board of Commissioners 1150 O Street Post Office Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 Dear Weld County Board of Commissioners, I am writing this letter to give support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project. I know that there are many concerns of neighbors and members of the community. I do however believe that this will benefit the entire community with the current and ongoing construction needs in this region. The need for new housing developments, retail centers, and safe and maintained roads is critical to the growth of our thriving community. The project site is near the railroad and close to major highways which makes it a well suited area for this project. It will benefit the entire community as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support economic growth may completed at a more reasonable cost as compared to importing materials by truck from other areas. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response. Sincerely, iPae(4 Christopher a rooke Benson EXHIBIT i C, FCFI V ED JUN 0 32015 [Your Name] tAS:4-r .10 CAA-m-0r%a Weld County Piann+ng uepar[ment [Street Address] 5-0 t 3 ��,t' GREELEY OFFICE ' 2 [City,ST ZIP Code) ,.eY t.e1 I C O 3O (,(1.?f [Date] t 7225 7O Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, L [Your Name] EXHIBIT I JUN 0 4 2015 Weld County Planning uepaii�riynt GREELEy OFFfCE June 1, 2015 Re: Martin Marietta Highway 34 Project To whom it may concern, 1 am an architect here in Northern Colorado,with over 20 years of experience in a wide range of projects that extends from single family housing to large scale commercial and institutional designs. 1 have been exposed to the various sides of the development review process, all over the nation, and can attest that both the developer side and the current neighborhood stake holder sides can be guilty of skewed perspectives and improper priorities (when one thinks of"greed" in the process it is usually attributed to the developers, but it can be just as easily and egregiously found on the side of the neighborhood owners). Since becoming aware of this project, 1 have been impressed with the level of professionalism and care that has been put into considering this site and the corresponding positive and negative effects that may come along with its development for this particular use. I believe the stake holders for the proposal have done an admirable job of trying to clearly communicate the unique benefits this site holds for their use. 1 would urge the current neighborhood home and business owners to try to truly step back and consider the unique convergence of rail and vehicular access this site provides and allow for the possibility that the project could facilitate not only an improvement of the immediate infrastructure but be a key stepping stone to long term improvement and growth for Weld County. Too often,no matter how well intention a new project can be, the voices of dissent can seem so deafening that those who are approving and even encouraged by the possibilities seem to not exist at all. 1 hope this letter will be one, among many, to communicate that there are people in Northern Colorado who are excited about local jobs and the possibility of increased access to local resources. Hopefully the thought of being a "good neighbor" will extend to the whole of Northern Colorado,which could benefit from this project. Sincerely, 4 ,a'-oe Donnell Paul, AlA LEED Accredited Professional EX Fs TR Perry Wertz 1755 Parkridge Drive JUN 0 4 2015 Johnstown Co, 80534 Weld County Planning ��N�EELEY OFFICE"""'" GR 5/26/2015 Weld County Board of Commissioners, 1150 O Street, Post Office Box 758 Greeley, Co. 80632 Dear Board of Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project. I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development.The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the Project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by Train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distance. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to you response! Sincerely, 3 7 EXHIBIT Case# USR 15-0027 For Public Record June 3, 2015 To: Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, A!CP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 RE: USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development Dear Commissioners, I would like to express my sincere concern for the impact that the above project would have on the health of local wildlife, my family and myself. I understand that there would be several types of activities related to the heavy industrial activity that would generate pollutants that will be released into the surrounding area. The fine dust particles from crushing concrete and rocks will be inhaled and are more harmful due to its ability to penetrate deeper into lungs. Melting bitumen does not only generate an obnoxious smell, it may increase the occurrence of asthma, migraines and other health problems in susceptible populations. Over 1120 trucks per day will emit a huge amount of diesel fumes. It is documented that heavy concentration of diesel exhaust increases the risk of cancer. Due to the close proximity, the proposed industrial plant is not compatible with existing homes and businesses. There are medical facilities treating acute mental and health issues which this facility would impact. Additionally it would be located too close to one of the few, available and dedicated, wildlife conservation areas. For these reasons, and numerous more, I urge you to deny the USR request. Sincerely yours, Anita Corner EXHIBIT 503 N. CR 3, Johnstown, CO 80534 Diana Aungst From: jds@skybeam.com Sent: Friday, June 05, 2015 8:24 AM To: Diana Aungst Subject: Martin Marietta Planning Application USR 15-0027 Case #USR 15-0027 For Public Record 5 June 2015 Weld county Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 Weld County Commissioners: RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development As a homeowner in Indianhead Estates, I would like to express my deep concerns and disapproval of the proposed Martin Marietta development for an aggregate processing facility, a recycled product processing facility, an asphalt plant, a ready mix concrete plant, et.al. This proposed development does not fit the surrounding residential and agricultural area. Traffic on highway 34 is already heavy, especially during morning and evening rush hours. Adding the large numbers of additional trucks and train cars that will be moving 24 hours a day, seven days a week will increase the traffic congestion, vibrations, pollution and noise to extreme levels, making living conditions in our subdivision exceedingly unpleasant and difficult. EXHIBIT 1 I Additionally, along with the new development already occurring at the I-25 and 34 intersection, a new retail center of 830,000 square feet (including the "second-largest sporting goods store in the country" 6 June 2015 Loveland Reporter-Herald, page 3A) will be built,with a corresponding increase in retail traffic. Adding more stoplights will only add additional delays in traffic, and have no effect on improving the flow, because there will simply be too much volume. Vastly increasing train traffic will also create backlogs and delays (and that's only in the summer, when the weather is good. Winter traffic is an entirely different matter altogether). This is not the location for Martin Marietta. I truly hope you will deny this petition, and request them to choose another less intrusive site. Thank you, Deborah Johnston jds@skybeam.com 970.667.1473 27280 Hopi Trail Loveland, Co 80534 2 Claude W Kage III 15890 Casler Ave Ft Lupton,Co 80621[City, ST ZIP Codej June 5, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). 1 understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally,the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Claude W Kage III EXHIBIT I Diana Aungst From: Dakota Worthley[dakota.worthley@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, June 05, 2015 9:49 AM To: Diana Aungst Subject: RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development Case#USR 15-0027 For Public Record Date: June 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 970-353-6100 ext 3524; Fax: 970-304-6498 daungst(a�weldgov.com EXHIBIT Weld County Commissioners: 1 q4 RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development Upon completion of reviewing the Martin Marietta Proposal Document, I am left with more questions than answers. There are several concerns raised that affect the community directly surrounding this land as well as what I believe to be direct impact on my lifestyle. • Truck Traffic o The proposal seems to indicate that since traffic is going to increase on CR 13, HWY 34 and I- 25 in the near future, why does it matter that they are bringing more in? A key point of concern here is that most of this traffic from Martin Marietta would be heavy truck traffic. This type of traffic is not only hard on all roads—safety problems, reduction in traffic flow and increase in traffic congestion also arise. o As noted in their Site Selection Report, the criteria of`impacting few neighbors' is not met on this proposed land. Children are getting picked up and dropped off by buses, farmers use this road for access on to their land, as well as bikers, runners and pedestrians frequently occupy this road—where the impact of heavy trucks and traffic would pose huge safety risks. 1 o There is also the issue of traffic flow and congestion. Heavy trucks cannot move along this road easily. With three sets of train tracks,not to mention trains stopped across these tracks every day and the delays felt already by motorists,heavy trucks will cause all movement to be delayed even further. Every day there are problems at the CR 13 and HWY 34 intersection. It is not unlikely that on a daily basis, it can take at least 3-4 minutes to cross this intersection,per vehicle. Yes, a stoplight may help in some cases.However if it takes a heavy truck 20 seconds to cross HWY 34, very few other motorists can make it through one light. o Traffic noise must also be taken into consideration. These heavy trucks make considerable noise slowing, stopping, and cruising. If this plant gets started, is there any consideration to the community during evening/nighttime/morning/weekend hours? Or will the constant sound of trucks and their vibrations keep my family from even enjoying sitting on our patio or playing in the yard? • Train Traffic o Train traffic follows along much of the same concerns as listed above. Yes,there are already a number of trains that pass through this area daily. There are a number of trains that stop on the tracks causing motor vehicle traffic to stop as well. This proposal will only increase this problem.Trains already whistle throughout the night causing sleep deprivation, now this proposal is calling for more train traffic. When a train goes through one of these crossings currently, it is impossible to have a conversation with someone standing right next to you. If this were to happen more and more frequently, especially with the stop and go of unloading and loading train cars, any activities outside would be affected; even enjoying an evening inside with the constant vibration of train movement,car switching,car wheels, and the train engine would impede on my quality of life. • Noise and View o The proposal admittedly states that noise levels may exceed the limit on some properties. This is not acceptable. The proposal also discusses a berm to reduce some of this noise impact, however the berm is not proposed on the west side of the facility. What are their plans to reduce noise and sight for any of the neighbors living just west of the track?There is also additional noise that should be addressed as well including vibration from trains and trucks,wheel noise from train on tracks with addition of train spur, banging of train cars as they stop and start, alarms from the plant. • Odor o The proposal also admittedly states that there will be an odor produced from an asphalt plant. This highly impacts the quality of my lifestyle—any outdoor activities must take into account an odor that not only affects enjoy-ability of being outside,but also to those who have sensitivities. Although their study showed air pollutant to be within the allowed amount,there is little discussion of the long term impacts—especially to children. These are just some of the main highlights from the proposal that have been left unanswered. Impacts on the environment, impacts on livestock,health issues, increased truck and railroad traffic, noise, lights, and odors from this plant will all significantly adversely affect my way of life. Until these concerns as well as the concerns from my neighbors have been addressed, I do not believe this is the right location for Martin Marietta's industrial site. 2 Thank you for your time, Dakota Worthley Randy Worthley 27238 CR 13 Johnstown CO 80534 Dakota.Worthley@gmail.com 3 JUN-05-2015 FRI 08:48 AM Wick & Trautwein Atty FAX NO. 9704828929 P. 01/01 Case# USR 15-0027 For Public Record June 5, 2015 VIA FACSIMILE: 970.304.6498 Weld County Commissioners Attn: Diana Aungst,MCP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Re: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development Dear Weld County Commissioners: This letter is to protest the above-referenced proposed development. Although, we live in Fort Collins, this project will have a negative impact upon our lives. We have two sets of elderly parents who live in Greeley as well as other family and friends who live there. Highway 34, which takes us to the homes of our parents and other loved ones, is already a busy, clogged highway. The additional traffic will make traveling on Highway 34 an absolute nightmare! We also have friends whose home and property is located at 1209 N. County Line Road, Johnstown, CO. We have watched these people over the years upgrade their home and property to improve the value and make it an enjoyable place in which to live. The impact upon the value of their home and property and the quality of their lives is great. The traffic, noise and pollution— just to name a few problems—will make their home, which is such a pleasant, relaxing retreat in the country, into a busy, noisy and even dangerous place to live_ It is unfair that a big corporation like Martin Marietta should be able to muscle their way into the lives of hard-working people and ruin their quality of life and the value of their homes and property. We ask you to stand up for the rights of the "little people" and make big corporate folks such as Martin Marietta find a location that is far removed enough to not ruin the lives of others. Thank you for your attention and consideration. ajkit, Joel and Barbara Robenhagen 1439 Snook Court Fort Collins, CO 80526 EXHIBIT lawsquaw@ginail.com Darby Kieler 26481 WCR 76 Eaton, CO 80615 June 5, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst(USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley,CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County,I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project(USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however,am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways,which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally,the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, D. by Kieler EXHIBIT Abby Glaser 10 Orchid Ct. Windsor. CO 80550 June 5, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst(USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project(USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however,am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways,which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally,the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Abby Glaser EXHIBIT cifi Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34 Info [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Friday, June 05, 2015 3:46 PM To: Diana Aungst Subject: FW: MMHighway34.com Support-Chloe Seiler From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [mailto:MMHighway34lnfo@MartinMarietta.com] Sent:Tuesday,June 02, 2015 2:03 AM To: MMHighway34 Info Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Chloe Seiler 123 Fourth St San Antonio, TX 78228 6/1/2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst(USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site,providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Chloe Seiler EXHIBIT It-- 1 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34 Info [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Friday, June 05, 2015 3:46 PM To: Diana Aungst Subject: FW: MM Highway 34 Support- David Jordan From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [mailto:MMHighway34Info@MartinMarietta.com] Sent:Tuesday,June 02, 2015 2:31 PM To: MMHighway34 Info Subject: MM Highway 34 Support Form David Jordan 5371 South Eaton Park Way Aurora, CO 80016 June 2, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst(USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project(USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, David Jordan ExHisn- 2 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34 Info [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Friday, June 05, 2015 3:45 PM To: Diana Aungst Subject: FW: MM Highway 34 Support- Paula Oransky From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [mailto:MMHighway34Info@MartinMarietta.com] Sent:Wednesday,June 03, 2015 10:08 AM To: MMHighway34 Info Subject: MM Highway 34 Support Form Paula Oransky 920 Sumner Way Erie, CO 80516 03 June 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst(USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17`h Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project(USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site,providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Paula Oransky EXHIBIT 3 hOD Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34 Info [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Friday, June 05, 2015 3:44 PM To: Diana Aungst Subject: FW: MM Highway 34 Support-Jeff Barber From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [mailto:MMHighway34Info@MartinMarietta.com] Sent:Wednesday,June 03, 2015 10:11 AM To: MMHighway34 Info Subject: MM Highway 34 Support Form Jeff Barber 2782 W. 106th Cir Westminster CO 80234 June 3, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst(USRI 5-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project(USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Jeff Barber EXHIBIT 4 I Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34 Info [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Friday, June 05, 2015 3:44 PM To: Diana Aungst Subject: FW: MMHighway34.com Support- Derek Jolly From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [mailto:MMHighway34lnfo@MartinMarietta.com] Sent:Wednesday,June 03, 2015 4:00 PM To: MMHighway34 Info Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Derek Jolly 1858 24th Ave Ct Greeley 06-03-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst(USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Derek Jolly EXHIBIT 5 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34 Info[MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Friday, June 05, 2015 3:43 PM To: Diana Aungst Subject: FW: MMHighway34.com Support Form -Jack Fockler From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [mailto:MMHighway34Info@MartinMarietta.com] Sent: Friday,June 05, 2015 2:19 PM To: MMHighway34 Info Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Jack Fockler 1481 Waterwood Dr Windsor 6/5/2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst(USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project(USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Jack Fockler EXHIBIT 6 Diana Aungst From: Kathleen Quam [quambk@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, June 07, 2015 1:03 PM To: Diana Aungst Subject: Planning application USR 15-0027 Martin Marietta Materials Hwy 34 Development Case #USR 15-0027 June 7,2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services Weld County Commissioners: RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027; Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development I am a resident of Indianhead Subdivision and am STRONGLY OPPOSED to the proposal of Martin Marietta to locate an asphalt plant (PRE14-0322) on WCR13 and Hwy 34, bordering our subdivision. This proposal will ADVERSELY affect the quality of life that is shared by over 100 families in this beautiful, peaceful neighborhood that has been in existence since the 70's, and our surrounding neighbors. The location of an asphalt plant anywhere near a residential are raises valid concerns of: 1) Severe health problems from exposure to toxic emissions 2) Truck traffic 3) Train traffic The increase of rail and truck traffic (CR13 & Hwy 34)that will exacerbate an already congested area. My home backs to Hwy 34 and I see what happens when there is a short train on the Great Western tracks. Traffic is backed up to CR 17 or beyond and sometimes all the way to Centerra. I have seen cars backing up on the shoulder, turning around in the grass median, driving the wrong way just to turn around and go another direction. Put a train with 4 locomotives and 100 cars and you are looking at a disaster with cars backed to 1-25 and the blocking of side roads and exits. Chaos! 4) Air Pollution from dust and odors from chemicals as well as diesel odor from the train and trucks 5)Noise Pollution Wheel noise from the constant turning of trains,banging train cars, train whistles 6) Visual and property degradation for all property owners causing a devastating economic impact for all of us. We enjoy and are entitled to the peace and beauty we have here. If Martin Marietta comes in our lives will drastically be changed. We will not be able to sit outside and enjoy the clear air and skies and the beauty that surrounds us. We will need to keep our windows closed to keep out the noise and smell. There are certainly more suitable locations for Martin Marietta to locate their facility, somewhere away from such a highly populated area. Please give thoughtful consideration to our concerns and REJECT Martin Marietta's proposal. Respectfully, Kathleen Quam EXHIBIT 6830 Lakota Ct. 1 Johnstown, CO 80534 quambk@gmail.com 2 Diana Aungst From: Susan Oplinger[soplinger@mesanetworks.net] Sent: Saturday, June 06, 2015 9:02 AM To: Diana Aungst Subject: Case USR15-0027 27687 Hopi Trail Johnstown, Colorado 80534 7 June 2015 Planners and Commissioners: I am a homeowner who will be severely impacted if Case USR15-0027 is approved, since my property lies within 500 feet of the rail spur proposed in the application. In addition to the noise I might hear any time of the day and/or night, I am very concerned about the increase in traffic on US 34. Since I have to get to US 34 off of county road 15, over the 8 years I have lived at this address, the traffic has increased tremendously. i have to now allow an extra 10 minutes to my drive time if I want to go West toward Loveland. That extra time is so I can get across the East lane and then onto the West lane of US 34. In addition, there are times when the traffic travelling East is backed up due to the light going into Windsor on US 34. This traffic is so backed up that I can't get through it to reach the center of the divided highway. Now I understand that Martin Marietta Materials wants to put a traffic light in where county road 13 enters US 34. This would be a benefit to them especially if they are trying to cross US 34 but would create even more of a back up on US 34 for those of us trying to travel either East or West on it. There is no benefit in that new light at county road 13 except to MMM. In addition MMM claims that there is already light industry on county 13 near US 34. This is correct but the trucking company produces NO Noise or Pollution. We don't even know it is there from that point of view. MMM's plant would be producing lots of noise and pollution right in my backyard. Susan Oplinger 27687 Hopi Trail Johnstown, Colorado EXHIBIT iO51 June 5, 2015 Weld County Commissioners Diana Aungst,AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 daungst@weldgov.com Re: USR15-0027 Martin Marietta Materials Hwy 34 Development We,Jesse and Kiki Martinez, owners of the property at 6819 Comanche Ct., in the Indian Head Subdivision, are writing to express our opposition to the Highway 34 Development project proposed Martin Marietta and Gerard Investments. The proposed Highway 34 Development project would include a rail loop with unloading capabilities for aggregate;an aggregate processing facility;a recycled processing facility;an asphalt plant;a ready mix concrete plant; and asphalt storage,cement storage and fuel storage facilities. The type of development described above would create a visual blight to our community since the project would be located in the immediate view shed of the resident located in Weld County Indian Head Estates properties and create industrial blight and hardship to the business owners and residents located in the adjacent Larimer County area. These are all Weld County and Larimer county residents and business owners who currently have wonderful and unobstructed views from industrial blight, of the Front Range and Rocky Mountain National Park. We are certain that the owners and investors of Martin Marietta and the Gerard Investment Group, most or all of which people do not live in Indian Head Estates, would not agree to this proposal either if this proposed project were to be located in their backyard. Nor would they want to have to suffer the inevitable ramifications of diminishing real estate values and economic hardship. Nor would they like their loved ones,especially their children,to suffer the negative environmental justice ramifications of detrimental health effects from increased and deleterious air and water quality issues. The asphalt and cement plant would create a visual blight, but the plants have the likely potential to create Colorado Clean Air Act, Federal Clean Air Act and other Environmental Protection Agency violations and issues from the increased emissions of carbon dioxide, methane gas, nitrous oxide and other deleterious emissions . Each of these green house gases has extremely high global warming potential and is detrimental to both natural processes and human activities. Noise and fugitive dust pollution would cause immediate short and long-term deleterious effects to the environment and the health of the residents, especially to children, located in the Indian Head Estates Subdivision and adjacent Larimer County residents and business owners. EXHIBIT Page 2 Letter from Jesse&Kiki Martinez Opposition to USR15-0027 Martin Marietta Materials Hwy 34 Development This type of development could also cause fragmentation of wildlife and bird migration and potentially be in violation of the Endangered Species Act and Migratory Bird Treaty Act. Furthermore,the type of development Martin Marietta proposes is likely to cause indirect and direct effects to the water quality of the area in direct violation of the Clean Water Act(CWA). It is likely the water tables directly connected to existing water ways, in particular,to the Big Thompson River located nearby, could be immediately impacted and residents from Weld and adjacent Larimer County affected by pollution of these Traditional Navigable Waters and in direct violation of the laws set out by the CWA and regulated by the U.S.Army Corps. Weld County,the State of Colorado,the Federal Government,Weld County Residents, and adjacent Larimer County residents should not approve the Highway 34 project proposed by Martin Marietta, and we adamantly oppose this or any other similar project proposed by Martin Marietta which would be located near the Indian Head subdivision in Weld County or adjacent Larimer County. If Weld County, Larimer County,the State of Colorado, or the Federal Government,despite the protests of residents, approves the Highway 34 project,then they must require Martin Marietta and Gerard Investment Group to provide mitigation in the form of a substantial monetary settlement with the residents of Indian Head Estates and adjacent Larimer County residents and business owners. The compensation would be mandatory mitigation for the inevitable loss in our real estate values;the loss of our beautiful scenery; the loss of the quiet and peaceful enjoyment of homes and our community; and compensation for loss of our long-term health and well-being of our children and ourselves. Very Concerned, Jesse& Kiki Martinez Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Monday, June 08, 2015 1:21 PM To: MMHighway34Info@MartinMarietta.com Subject: MM Highway 34 Support Form Debbra Smith 3024 Sumac Street Unit#1 Fort Collins, Co 80526 6/08/2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst(USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project(USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally,the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site,providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Debbra Smith EXHIBIT 1 WO RFCF!vcrli Patrese E. Yarbrough JUN 05 2015 P.O. Box 272283 Weld County Plan;iin, GREELEY "�EiUneut Fort Collins, Co. 80527 OFFIC May 28, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I am excited for the job growth that will surly result in this brilliantly executed project. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response, and I thank you in advance. Sincerely, h11iwCiA&>tg_ Patrese E. Yar rough EXHIBIT JUN 052015 rLIUCWeld County Planning i,NdI IIL [Your Name] 'I 11 �" p��C� GREELEY OFFICE [Street Address] 3-7 [City,ST ZIP Code] 7— Vttie S Co• %02 (Date) C, /Lei I ZO Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may he completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, [Your Name] 14' C_Cty- (3) EXHIBIT Diana Aungst From: Hanna Soffa [hanna24_7 365@hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, June 08, 2015 1:04 PM To: Diana Aungst Subject: Stop the Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development Case#USR 15-0027 For Public Record Date: June 8,2015 To: Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development Weld County Commissioners: I am requesting that you NOT allow the Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development to proceed as planned. This proposed project will only negatively affect me,my fellow drivers,and those living in proximity to the Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development. The Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development will destroy the livelihood and bottom out the property value of any homeowner in proximity to this development. The air quality along Highway 34 will destroyed by the Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development omitting the smell of asphalt. I commute from Loveland to Greeley and back daily on Highway 34. As a regular user of Highway 34, I strongly oppose the Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development. Highway 34 is already is busy and dangerous highway during high traffic hours of the day and allowing the Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development to increase this traffic is an absurd idea. An increase in traffic on Highway 34 will affect me negatively by increasing my drive time due to more vehicles on the road, will increase my fuel costs from sitting in traffic, and will increase the likelihood that I will be involved in an accident. Currently, Highway 34 is not regularly monitored by the police or highway patrol allowing drivers to maintain a flow of traffic at speeds of 75 mph or higher. I am being passed by drivers doing 90 mph on Highway 34 on a regular basis. Reckless drivers regularly cut me off, swerve in and out of traffic,and barely miss causing an accident because they are not paying enough attention to stop in time because they are driving at a high rate of speed. Incorporating a massive quantity of Martin Marietta Materials trucks onto this already busy Highway 34 will only increase problems and frustrations across the board. The Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development will also increase the rail car traffic crossing Highway 34, which will in turn cause more stop and go traffic on Highway 34. One or two trains crossing Highway 34 during the high traffic hours of the day can cause backups on the highway that can become longer than a half mile in a matter of a few minutes. Multiple trains a day from the Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development will cause horrific traffic backups along Highway 34 that will make driving unbearable. Highway 34 will not be able to withstand regular train traffic crossing and keep the flow of traffic moving. The purpose of the highway is to keep traffic moving and the Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development will do nothing but cause traffic to slow and stop too often. This development will not benefit the Highwa 34 community in any way. EXHIBIT Highway 34 does not need more stoplights.Increasing the number of stop lights will only slow the flow of traffic and cause backups during the high traffic hours of the day. Like the increase of rail car activity on Highway 34,the increase of stop lights on the highway will not allow for the flow of traffic to keep moving. I have lived in the Johnstown-Greeley-Loveland area for over 20 plus years,am a native Coloradoan and would like to protect our air quality. The smell from the Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development will destroy our air quality along Highway 34. I have no interest in being forced to smell the noxious fumes released by asphalt production on a regular basis. Asphalt fumes gag me and if I am left to smell them long enough will cause me to become ill. I do not wish to become ill on a regular basis because I have to sit in traffic and smell the fumes from Martin Marietta Materials. I do not believe an increase of people having to pull over and vomit because of the smell of asphalt will be beneficial to the flow of traffic on Highway 34. I have family in the immediate area of the Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development that will impacted by the noxious fumes looming around their home.I will not be able to visit my family if all I can smell is asphalt. Fresh air is an attractive incentive to remain in the Northern Colorado area and plans like the Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development will only destroy what Coloradans have come to expect from our precious state. Regards, Hanna Soffa 1408 Dover Ave Loveland, CO 80538 hanna24 7 365@hotmail.com 2 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.corn Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Monday, June 08, 2015 1:33 PM To: MMHighway34Info@MartinMarietta.com Subject: MM Highway 34 Support Form Roper Marquiss 4919 Delany Drive Fort Collins, CO 80528 06/08/2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst(USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project(USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I,however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally,the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site,providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Roper Marquiss EXHIBIT 1 t 1 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Monday, June 08, 2015 2:41 PM To: joe@pei-corp.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Joe Shinagle 812 Rocky Mountain Way Fort Collins, CO 80526 June 8, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 EXHIBIT tla Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project(USR15-0027). As a contractor who has 200 employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! 1 Sincerely, Joe Shinagle 2 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Monday, June 08, 2015 2:49 PM To: bobp@pei-corp.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Bob Parkin 5600 S. Quebec St. 107A Greenwood Village, CO 80111 06/08/2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst(USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 EXHIBIT I 41-13--- Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project(USR15-0027). As a contractor who has 200 employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site,providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! 1 Sincerely, Bob Parkin 2 [Your Name] 6564 N Cty Rd 11C Loveland CO 80538 June 8, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). As a contractor who has 35 employees,the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials.The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We are having to travel further and further now due to closing pits and quarries that are running out of materials. I hear often from builders that cost in the last two years have increased up to 35%for especially residential construction. It is our desire to keep this industry affordable so that residents can continue to move to this state and afford housing, on which we depend for our livelihood. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld & Larimer County. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, ,Jordan Kamps [Your Name] EXHIBIT ' ( ' (4 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Monday, June 08, 2015 6:06 PM To: MMHighway34lnfo@MartinMarietta.com Subject: MM Highway 34 Support Form Tammi Barber 2782 w 106th cir Westminster CO 80234 June 9th 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Tammi Barber EXHIBIT 1 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Monday, June 08, 2015 6:34 PM To: MMHighway34Info@MartinMarietta.com Subject: MM Highway 34 Support Form Jackie Wilson 2782 w 106th cir Westminster CO 80234 June 8 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project(USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally,the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Jackie Wilson EXHIBIT 1 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Monday, June 08, 2015 6:11 PM To: njoransky@icloud.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Nick Oransky 920 Sumner Way Erie,CO. 80516 07-08-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project(USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I,however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site,providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Nick Oransky EXHIBIT 1 ' ( ( '7 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Monday, June 08, 2015 6:10 PM To: pinkhourglass3@gmail.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Jan Wilderman 9140 Grove St Westminster CO 80234 June 9th 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project(USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Jan Wilderman EX BIT 1 June 3, 2015 RECEIVE® Weld County Zoning and Planning Department JUN 08 2015 1555 N. 17th Ave. Greeley, CO 80631 Weld County Planning Uepariment GREELEy OFFICE Dear Weld County Zoning& Planning Department, I am writing this letter to express my deep concern about the proposed Martin Marietta Highway 34 Development. My husband and I moved here from Reno, Nevada on May 18, 2015. We specifically chose our home based on many qualities that a home on an acre lot backed up to beautiful farmland, quiet neighborhood and amazing view of the Rocky Mountains. The proposed development will not only ruin our quality of life, but it will devastate our future of a beautiful view and peaceful surrounding. Please reconsider the area that backs up to our home! We live at 27601 Hopi Trail and the proposed development site is practically in our backyard. Thank you for your attention to this matter. � Since ly, ne' Wingerson EXHIBIT iit ci RFCF JUN 082015 Weld County Plannuig anent RELEY OFFICE Weld County Zoning and Planning Department 1555 N. 17th Ave. Greeley, CO 80631 May 24, 2015 RE: Martin-Marietta asphalt, concrete & aggregate plant proposition Dear Weld County Zoning and Planning Department, Please let me introduce myself. I have been hired by Banner Health to work in the local hospitals in Greeley, Loveland and Fort Collins. As I write I this letter, I am looking out my dining room to the south east at the Colorado Rocky Mountain range vista at 27601 Hopi Trail, in the Indianhead Estates subdivision on lot 19, block 3. I understand that the proposed asphalt, concrete &aggregate plant will be a source of up to 100 jobs, which is very important. I am not unsympathetic to those looking for those positions for their livelihood given the recently depressed economy of the last 7 years. I had not read a word about the proposed plant and have only unpacked the kitchen since moving in and have spoken to 3 people about the issue prior to writing this letter. I would request that the plant location not be where it is currently proposed, due to the effect upon the quality of life, wildlife activity and property values. It would create industrial pollution of the region with high and low pitch noise &vibration, night light, diesel and petroleum odor&silica dust. All, related to the plant function and railway spur. With that said, my wife and I are very worried about a dramatic decrement of our quality of life, property value and the wildlife activity, due to this prosed industrial invasion of this agricultural region. The agricultural exposure was a major feature of selecting this home site, since my maternal family had a farm in northeast Kansas. I understand that there is a second proposed industrial site immediately west of our subdivision slated to go forward if the above referenced project is successfully inserted.We purchased our buy and die, dream home (we will die in this home). On May 20th, I was standing in our front drive waiting for the moving van when I introduced myself to a walking neighbor. She asked if I had heard about the above referenced proposal. My wife and I had repeatedly asked our buying realtor and the selling realtor if there was any development planned behind our home and were repeatedly told that there had been discussion of a rock plant but that had been moved elsewhere. EXHIBIT We chose this one acre home on this site for multiple reasons, not least of which was the quiet, calm, tranquil countryside, with the dark nights and quiet days. We were attracted to the site by the abundance of nature—fox, meadowlark (the Kansas state bird from my origin), robins,finch's, English sparrows,great blue heron, red winged blackbirds, mallards, barn swallows, Canadian geese, pelican, mourning doves, black birds and rabbits all seen from out dining room. We are told that raccoons will be visiting when the sweet corn and grapes are ready for harvest. The original owners reportedly moved to down size and to a smaller lot home closer to their family after developing an orchard with apples, peaches and plums and table grapes. I, having been a master gardener in Idaho, am looking forward to a garden again, after living in an apartment for nearly 2 years at a transitional position. In a previous summer career in high school and college, I worked in the hot tar and gravel roofing industry. I am very familiar with the now known carcinogenic&toxic odors associated with the petroleum products used in making asphalt road and roofing materials. I am concerned with the silicosis lung damage risk of an aggregate and concrete plant that runs full time. I understand that dust is an issue in a farming community, however,given my faming background, the dust is created for a few days for planting,a few days for cultivating some crops and a few days for harvest of the crop and with some crops a few days to tilt the soil after harvest to return the stubble for enriching the soil.This being a far cry from the 5-7 day a week dust generation of an aggregate plant. The circular rail way spur that is proposed will be within a few hundred yards of the south east corner of our property. In my work I am called into the hospitals at all hours of the night and day to attend to emergency situations, requiring me to be able to sleep during the day to catch up on my rest. Even if the railways are said to be operating only during business hours it will still interrupt my sleep. I would not relish having to finish out a bedroom in the basement for daytime sleeping and move my CPAP sleeping device down to that room whenever I am trying to catch up on sleep from a night time event. My wife is quite sensitive to light and noise in the bedroom at night, to the point that when traveling I will put electrical tap on the smoke detector lights and television lights and towels over the alarm clock readout. She has always told me at night the subtle lights look like "searchlights"that disrupt her sleep, again a reason we moved into the agricultural area. She has appreciated the bedroom south to the dark farm land and with a paucity of homestead and street lamps. We have heard highway 34 but primarily from the north side of the house, most obviously when the roads are wet, creating more traffic noise pollution. The diesel engines of the railway not only will contribute to noise pollution with wheel squeal and engine noise, day and night, but also light pollution and fuel pollution, which undoubtedly will affect our garden, orchard,grape vines and wildlife. Currently the railway line that is south of our property seems to be minimally traveled and I have not heard it in the day or night and only seen it active one time during our first 4 days in the new home.We were aware the line was in the area and accepted that in our assessment of suitability of the property. Our"Garden of Eatin", without any work is home to asparagus, rhubarb, onions,thyme and oregano. Our orchard is home we are told to apples, peaches and plums and two grape vines, which will be followed by many more. We plan on seeding the garden with carrots, kale, lettuce and radishes as soon as it dries up enough to get in to plant. We will have Early Girl, Cherokee, Brandywine and super sweet 100 tomato varieties for sure with others as recommended by CSU agriculture department. We will have self-seeding dill and cilantro, as well as perennial lemon verbena, lovage & Italian parsley. We will build a fire ring for night time S'more's and hot dog BBQ with our local and distant relatives when visiting. I enjoy relaxing winter or summer watching the stars and planets pass by, with the occasional Arora borealis, at least when we were in Idaho. We will also continue to watch the sky events, of which the views would currently reveal Jupiter and Venus if it were not for the monsoon weather of late.We are looking forward to the Perseid Meteor Shower in August. Light pollution from an industrial plant would certainly degrade that experience. The above are my concerns about the proposed industrial location in my back yard. I did my due diligence regarding the property and it did not alert us to the potential developments. Please take my letter as a deep show of disapproval of the placement of this industrial complex in my back yard. I will not be able to attend the meeting this coming week,with an additional move trip. But will be at the future planning and zoning meetings. Respectfully yours, ric A. Wingerson Case #USR 15-0027 For Public Record May 25, 2015 Weld County Commissioners C/O Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 171h Avenue Greeley Colorado 80631 Attn: Weld County Commissioners, Re: Planning Application- USR 15-0027- Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development Commissioners, In response to the filing by Martin Marietta Materials (MMM) I would offer the following comments to the application and the subsequent review by the Weld County Commissioners (WCC). I have reviewed the filing in its entirety and find that while it states that it meets with the compatibility of the intent of Chapter 22 and or the Master Plan of the affected municipalities; The USE differs fundamentally as it relates to and is located in an A(Agricultural) Zoning District. it seems that the requirements as provided by Uses by Special Review require additional consideration to ensure that they are reviewed in a manner to assure compatibility with the existing and planned USES of the surrounding neighborhood. The Special Review should take into consideration the affect on the current compilation of the existing neighborhood and the affect on the future growth of the neighborhood. It appears from my perspective that given the nature of the proposal and the fact that a second proposal to Re- Zone the adjacent property (Envirotech/McWhinney/Weld34LLC Zoning Change Application) to the North creates a heavy Industrial neighborhood. As currently found in this neighborhood we are comprised of farming, residential properties with a few commercial businesses included. Once the Heavy Industrial Environment is established the simple fact that farming and construction of private residential neighborhood will probably cease to be a reality in the near surrounding neighborhood. The foothold is established and only heavy industrial partnerships will be in our future. The die would be cast and our current form of lifestyle will be dramatically affected. How would the Commissioners feel if this was to take place next door to your home. The intent as stated in MMM proposal indicates that the USE would be for the processing and transportation of asphalt, concrete and associated materials that support an industrial receiving, processing and delivery facility for these products. They take the minimalistic approach as they discuss the anticipated issues. it appears that they are intentional vague as they address most if not all of the issues as a condition of the application. • Compatibility of the USE The existing surrounding area is predominantly agriculture and residential with light commercial businesses. The USE as stated MMM is clearly incompatible with the existing USE as currently found in the surrounding area. I would find it difficult at best to surmise that this heavy industrial application is anywhere near compatible with the existing farms, residential housing and minor commercial businesses currently found EXHIBIT adjacent to the area intended to be leased by MMM. If there was inf act something good i 611 to be realized from this facility such as this proposed plant, homeowners such as ourselves would all be tripping over each other to build our homes adjacent to one of the current existing plants such as this one. I do not believe that this type of behavior can be found anywhere near a plant such as this proposed facility. This in itself causes me to wonder at the adequacy of the research that was performed by MMM and their paid advocates. Clearly the application is intentionally vague to say the least with respect to the actual conditions the plant would be designed and operate with. As the Vice President of Operations of a heavy industrial contractor I have a clear understanding of the influences of noise, light, and the anticipated disruptions of an industrial plant of this nature on my employees during an 8 hour day, let alone having to be exposed to these same conditions 24 hours a day as we as homeowners will be experiencing. This plant offers nothing good in comparison to the disruption of our daily lifestyles. As a person who grew up in the original conception of an industrial park-Commerce City (formally Derby) during the 50's 60's and 70's I can attest to the lifestyle disruption of taking a small farming community and inducing industrial and heavy commercial business to that community. There is nothing good to say concerning the outcome. We currently still own the original residence that I grew up in. I can personally assure you that this area is far from the same environment than it was then! • Noise/Light Pollution The reality is that the Use will be far more invasive than proposed by MMM in their filing. They simply downplay any and all issues of as they relate to Truck traffic, Train traffic, light odor and noise pollution. Their intent to build a berm(10 ft tall)to reduce the noise and sight issues will not be adequate to shield residences on the east side of Indianhead Estates. We are one of these houses that back up to WC Road 15. At the elevation of our home, the sound near the lake below us and adjacent to the property in USR 15-0027 cannot be reduced by building a 10 ft tall berm. Currently I can hear the noise generated by the tractors, hunters and others around the lake as clear as if I was there in person from our deck. Noise is a funny thing; it is generated and transmitted as a line of site issue. Clearly from our vantage point, the noise generated at the propose site will be clearly evident in our home during any form of operations at the proposed facility. The fact that they want to operate on a 24/7 schedule will be catastrophic to our lifestyle. The noise will be a major nuisance given the constant din to say the very least. While they have spoken to the sound levels and the State and County limits that would not be exceeded, to actually hear the sound on a continuing basis is far more disruptive to our lifestyle. We will be unable to sit and enjoy the view without listening to the roar of stone crushers, vibrators, conveyors and compressors unloading the rail cars and bulk trucks. The constant din of the concrete batch plant and the lovely smell of the asphalt plant as it dispenses the paving materials at all hours of the day and night. As an avid amateur astronomer, the light generated will obscure the heavens even more than they are at present. MMM's lighting plane speaks to direct and indirect (non- reflective) lighting on our properties and to the traffic operators. The report is silent as to the any form of"Dark Sky" compliance. No berm can be built high enough to block the noise and direct/indirect light that we would be subject to. In addition MMM states in the application that they will be utilizing mobile crushers, plants • Traffic Congestion Currently the volume of traffic on Hwy 34 is to a point that at times vehicles are unable to transverse the lanes for quite some time. The addition of I have at time waited up to 7 minutes to be able to cross the lanes. At my office across from the Rehabilitation Hospital (1/4 mile east of Centura Boulevard, the traffic is already at the critical volume at certain times of the day. The traffic backs up from the west bound lanes from Centura well past my office and it is near impossible to travel East bound at those time. While this may not be the case 24 hours a day the traffic will not get less moving forward it will only get worse. MMM application indicates that there is a possibility of the need for a signal light at the intersection of Weld County Road 13 and U.S. Hwy 34. As someone who travels this hwy regularly I can attest that there will be a need for a Traffic signal. MMM states that they will be utilizing tractor trailer trucks o transport their materials. These trucks will not be able to traverse the intersection as well as a smaller vehicle (due to their coming up to speed) in a safe manner without impeding the existing traffic flows. The safety concern of this operation clearly needs to be addressed in greater detail for the safety of all people who travel Hwy 34. In addition the addition of a traffic signal on U.S. Hwy 34 will add another aspect of concern as vehicles traveling west bound on Hwy 34 from WCR 17 will be topping the hill adjacent to Indianhead Estates and the traffic will be backed up from WCR 13 signal creating another safety concern. • Economic benefits MMM speaks to the many factors that affect real estate values. They state that based on "their experiences"they do not expect the project will not harm nearby property values. The word "expect" is concerning to me as this clearly is not the first plant of this nature that they have constructed near residential properties. They should be able to clearly identify the impacts whether it is short or long term and the expected outcome based on their past experiences. The vagueness again concerns me as to the actual outcome of the impacts that we will experience. As to the economic impact to Weid County I am sure that the property and sales tax to be generated is attractive to the County. MMM has stated that this revenue is expected to be in the range of 36 million in 10 years, or about 3.6 million per year. While to the average person this may seem like a lot of money the reality it becomes a drop ofin the bucket for the County. I would suspect that this revenue will be offset by damage to the infrastructure and other areas of concern At the end of the day the Commissioners will vote they way they feel is right for whatever reason they can justify to themselves. However I would ask that you take into consideration the concerns of the nearby homeowners, communities and all parties that oppose this development. This would only be the first of such industrial neighbors that will be seeking to ride on the coattails of MMM. This is a reality given the request to rezone the adjacent property to the north by Envirotech/McWhinney/Weld34LLC for Heavy Industrial use. Who will be next in line? It's up to the WCC to decide the future of this corridor. Sincerely; •"ter="-�a�� • J. Michael EanbcT` 27261 Hopi Trail Johnstown, Colorado 80534 Indian Head Estates Homeowner Case #USR 15-0027 For Public Record June 8, 2015 Weld County Commissioners CIO Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services EXHIBIT 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley Colorado 80631 iaa Attn: Weld County Commissioners, Re: Planning Application- USR 15-0027-Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development Commissioners, You have received a letter from my husband—J Michael Earwood. I would also like to add my voice and my support for the denial of approval of the MMM application. I totally support the position he has taken in his letter. Let it be noted we are not alone in this fight. This USR Application— I guess I should say projects—which includes any and all applications and proposals in the future of this nature does NOT belong here. It is much more than an eyesore for the residential community surrounding it on the Weld County side. It also will affect the businesses on the east side which happens to be in Larimer County. Not only will it affect everyone within this surrounding area— both Weld and Larimer—it will have a domino effect on anyone who travels Highway 34—both ways—going from Loveland to Greeley and Greeley to Loveland. The addition of trucks and trains to an already busy highway is a total nightmare. As a real example, I left our home on Friday the 3rd of June to go west to Loveland. Weird it was so easy to get across 34. Strange but there was no traffic from the west heading east. I turned on to 34 heading west to Loveland where upon I discovered the reason for no traffic heading from Loveland east to Greeley, A TRAIN! This was approximately 11:30 am. The train was in motion at that time. HOWEVER, 30 minutes later we are still stopped on 34 and not going anywhere as the train kept going back and forth on the track. People were becoming frustrated -a few drove across the median—others drove down the breakdown lane in order to catch the side roads. I was just thinking what if an ambulance— police—fire truck NEEDED to get through! It was now noon and we finally are able to move. Thirty minutes! I do not know how far back the traffic was behind me but I can tell you the traffic on the east bound side of 34 headed into Greeley was up to and past the 1-25 exchange. Those who did not cross the median or did catch a side road were frustrated and obviously late in getting to where they were headed. More trains on 34 definitely are not the answer. Plus the train tracks are not in the best of condition for additional traffic—both for the cars as well as the trains. Morning and evening commuters are not going to be pleased with any more headaches that will be added based on the number of additional trucks and trains to be encountered. Plus those who are in such a hurry and cut in and out of traffic are only going to cause more problems. It was just recently that two cars headed east on 34 went across the highway and crashed into my husband's office building. Fortunately the building was the major victim. The traffic and problems that will be attributed to this additional truck and train traffic will surly cause more issues. Also, I personally noted on my recent trip to the Motor Vehicle Department on O Street the number of Martin Marietta trucks that were coming and going from their plant in Greeley. The number of trucks was creating significant traffic problems. Again,just another traffic problem to consider for those who do travel Highway 34. This is a reality in Greely and will be even a worse reality for Hwy 34. Diana Beccue June 8, 2015 Page 2/2 Now, Martin Marietta has said that they are willing to pay for a stop light at Highway 34 and County Road 13. Several years ago we went to a meeting hosted by CDOT to discuss the future of 34 and traffic issues. At that meeting CDOT stated that County Road 13 is actually an extension of Colorado Boulevard and plans were to develop it to assist the volume that would be on 1-25. If this is true do you really think that this project—traffic light included would really be a benefit? In fact just west of this proposed project is where a Rehabilitation Hospital and other suitable business are located. Here is a true traffic nightmare—between people trying to get across to go to Loveland and those trying to merge to go to Greeley and then those who are trying to go into the Business area—it is a nightmare. Let it be noted there was never an issue with businesses at 25/34. They fit in the mix. Martin Marietta does not fit this profile or any of the businesses hoping to follow them as well. The difference in between INDUSTRIAL and COMMERCIAL is substantial. The fact that Gerard Excavating has a storage facility and repair shop on the current property is light years different than that of a full blown processing facility. Thus, Martin Marietta's generous offer for a stop light at 34 and CO13 would only make everything worse. Do these people not understand this is not where you should call home? We have been down this road before when they were known as LaFarge. It sucked then and it still sucks. This letter was started in May. However there was so much I wanted to say that I kept trying to keep my concerns short and to the point. I have lived here since 1987. In the day we had party telephone lines, you had to go to both Larimer and Weld County to get utilities and services—and no pizza delivery. Yes we had dairy farms, feed lots and dirt roads. But that was the charm. We did not move to the country to make it a city. We moved to the country to enjoy what was around us. It was great—which is why we moved here. We respected their life and moved here not to be a deterrent but to a part of a wonderful life. They were here first and respected that. We knew that someday this area would be discovered and built up. But this project and the other projects behind it do not fit in or belong here. Both Michael and I are from Commerce City, while we have a lot of fond memories of the past we also know first-hand what something that does not belong in the area can do to destroy the integrity of the community. Who was here first? Who has paid the taxes over the years? While I have not mentioned anything about the noise, light and just general pollution that would come with this project I would like to ask you to keep both Weld and Larimer County in the loop of information. That would include not only the surrounding neighbors, but also CDOT, State Patrol, Sheriff Department, Fire Department and the newspapers for both Greeley and Loveland. Please get their input before making ANY decision on this project. My last question to you is . . . Is this project to financially benefit a few worth the negative impact it will have on many? Thank you for your consideration. I sincerely hope that you realize how important this matter is. Sincerely, Diana Beccue 27261 Hopi Trail Johnstown, Colorado 80534 Indian Head Estates Homeowner ka5perboLuer (Ircsr(\i9w‘c-LIL-Q--) [Your Name] 21506 CR 1 Berthoud CO 80513 June 9, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst(USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, [Your Name] EXHIBIT Sreve Vondy[Your Name] 5546 Fossil Ridge Drive West Ft. Collins Co. 80525 June 9, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways,which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, [Your Name] EXHIBIT Case#USR 15-0027 For Public Record June 9, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, Coloardo 80631 970-353-6100 ext 3524; Fax 970-304-6498 daungst@weldgov.com Weld County Commissioners: RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development My name is Natalie Rochester and I am a resident of Indianhead estates in Weld county, near the proposed Martin Marietta build site. I am writing this letter to make known my concerns for the incompatibility for such industrial use of the land. I am a physician, an OB/GYN serving Weld and surrounding counties. I deliver babies and perform surgeries at the Medical Center of the Rockies. I work in clinic locations in Greeley as well as Loveland. The majority of my patient population is located in Weld county. I am also a wife and a mother of one child and another on the way. I give you this background as this helps set the stage for my concerns. Lack of Compatibility with surrounding area: First off the location for the proposed build is not compatible with the surrounding areas. I chose to move to this area as a physician to be able to provide care in a state of the art hospital system and environment as well as serve a community that is planned, forward thinking, and cares about the environment in which my patients live.The 125/34 corridor and surrounding areas have created a master plan that keep large industrial centers away from residential and commercial centers.This obviously serves many health benefits (limiting exposure to cancerous and harmful chemicals that industrial sites produce),while allowing a peaceful living and work environment. A master plan that has been placed by surrounding communities has a goal of creating harmony with residential, rural and commercial property. In this master plan, placing industrial space in the middle of these areas will destroy the goal of preserving a pristine environment, encouraging outdoor activities, promoting healthy lifestyles, and encouraging people to live and work in surrounding areas. An asphalt/concrete plant in no way fits or supports being placed in or adjacent to residential areas.The risk to the community and local citizens' wellbeing simply isn't worth it. We currently live in an environment that provides relaxation, peaceful outdoor activities, mountain views, and encourages outdoor exercise and activities. Having a plant adjacent to our community will hinder ALL of these things. EXHIBIT Health risks and hazards: We need to consider the multiple short and long term health hazards that would come about from this plants proposed location. Reviewing EPA and NIH data shows no paucity in concern for exposure to small particles and chemicals released from the manufacture of cement/concrete. Among this literature there is documentation of release of multiple chemicals and toxins including: Mercury(as an ob/gyn and mother this causes concern due to developmental and severe birth defects), dioxins (shown to increase risk of cancer, Infertility in both men and women, liver and pancreatic dysfunction), increased air emissions and small particle emissions (shown and documented to increased respiratory failure and hospital admission by up to 38% in people living within 2 miles of such plants).These chemicals have also been found in the water supply in surrounding areas and thus have a potential to affect a greater radius of individuals. • As a mother and a health care provider, allowing such and thing to happen in and near a residential community sets the stage that the county does not care about the well-being of its residents. With known severe health risks, placing such risk in and around residential homes would be setting the standard that having a plant/industrial complex is more important than the lives and health of the counties citizens. I cannot support such an attitude. • Who will be paying for these long term health concerns of residents in our neighborhood as they are certain to occur based on data of those whom live within a 2 mile radius of such plants? Noise: As mentioned, I have a profession that requires me to have an unusual schedule. Some days I may work a 12 hour shift, others I may be on call for 24-72 hours.Given this schedule, I need to be able to sleep in an environment that is comfortable and quiet. Not getting adequate sleep could affect me as a surgeon and a healthcare provider in a negative way. Currently we live in a neighborhood that can provide quiet,dark environment at night and a quiet environment during the day. I am concerned that the plant being out my back window will challenge my ability to obtain the needed rest between my shifts. This also is of concern given we have a small child who will need naps and a soon to be newborn that will also be affected by potential lights and noise related to the MM plant. Traffic concern: The traffic changes that are likely to occur on HWY 34 are major. I understand that there is a proposed stop light/intersection at CR 13 to help ease the traffic of large trucks onto HWY 34. This may mitigate a small portion of the traffic flow problem, however there is also increased train traffic. This is concerning for many reasons. Increasing congestion/traffic in this area will slow my ability to get to work in a timely manner. Given that I must be able to get to the hospital in a timely fashion in case of a delivery or emergency, having significant changes in the traffic pattern could hinder that. Decreased home value: Location of the plant close to and surrounding a pleasant, established, sought after community is detrimental to home value and living conditions. Placing an industrial site this close to residential areas will negatively impact our home value as well as ability to resale the home. Thank you for taking time to accept my letter and reviewing my concerns. I sincerely hope that the board will take into consideration the lifestyle and physical well-being of its citizens over the placement of this plant in an agricultural/residential/commercial area. Sincerely, Natalie Rochester, MD Indianhead Estates homeowner 6768 Apache Rd natalierochester@gmail.com Diana Aungst From: MM Highway 34 Support[MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2015 2:38 PM To: MMHighway34lnfo@MartinMarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form JP Morgan 5460 Montana Vista Way Castle Rock, CO 80108 6/9/15 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst(USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 EXHIBIT Dear Weld County Commissioners: I 1a (O I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project(USR15-0027). As a contractor who has 200 employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally,the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! t Sincerely, JP Morgan 2 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2015 2:47 PM To: MMHighway34lnfo@MartinMarietta.com Subject: MM Highway 34 Support Form tony collins 160 inverness drive west suite 110 englewood, CO 80112 6/9/15 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst(USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site,providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, EXHIBIT tony collins I ! aq 1 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2015 12:19 PM To: MMHighway34Info@MartinMarietta.com Subject: MM Highway 34 Support Form Mathew Cooley 2291 W. Briarwood Ave. Littleton, CO 80120 6/09/2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst(USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project(USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, EXHIBIT Mathew Cooley ia % 1 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2015 9:44 AM To: MMHighway34lnfo@MartinMarietta.com Subject: MM Highway 34 Support Form Dan Venrick 4205 Page Place Loveland CO 80537 6/9/15 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project(USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however,am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally,the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Dan Venrick EXHIBIT 11 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2015 9*02 AM To: sunedelighttanningsalon@hotmail.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Gregory Geier/George Geier& Son LLC 4632 E. County Road 60 Wellington,CO 80549 6/9/15 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst(USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17t1 Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 EXHIBIT 1130 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). As a contractor who has 2 employees,the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down,which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets,build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials,mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site,providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! 1 Sincerely, Gregory Geier/George Geier& Son LLC 2 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2015 3:47 PM To: bob.tudor@comcast.net Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Robert E Tudor 6640 Stagecoach Ave Firestone 6/9/2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst(USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project(USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally,the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Robert E Tudor EXHIBIT 1 113/ Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 6:31 AM To: tevered@hamoninfrastructure.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Thomas O. Evered 5670 Franklin Street Denver, Colo 80216 06/10/2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst(USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 EXHIBIT 13a . Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project(USR15-0027). As a contractor who has 250 employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets,build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials,mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site,providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! 1 Sincerely, Thomas 0. Evered 2 Case# USR 15-0027 For Public Record May 30, 2015 To:Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development Dear Weld County Commissioners, As a native Weld County Coloradoan, I grew up proud of the community that I shared with my ancestors and many relatives that lived, farmed and owned businesses in the area. As one of the largest food producing counties in the country,we were all blessed with fresh air,food and "right" livelihoods as well as expansive views of the majestic mountains. People continue to choose to come to Weld County because it can be a great place to call home.As a real estate broker who has made a living selling homes and farms I implore you to maintain Weld County as a quality destination. I am deeply concerned that should Weld County allow a heavy industrial activity,such as is proposed in the above USR,to be allowed next to a well-established neighborhood that it would jeopardize the desirability of existing or future developments. If those who made the largest investment of their lives cannot trust Weld County's elected officials to protect that investment now,what does that imply to others?Will the future of Weld County be an undesirable mix of heavy industry dropped in where ever any large company decides it is profitable for them, but not at all compatible to the neighboring community?Approving the Martin Marietta Materials industrial development is not only wrong for the local community but sets a precedence that could damage the integrity of our fine county. Please do not approve the above USR. Sincerely, Gary ttman Greeley, CO 80631 EXHIBIT I 1 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2015 9:11 PM To: MMHighway34Info@MartinMarietta.com Subject: MM Highway 34 Support Form Val Robertson 5645 W 112Th P1 Westminster CO 80020 June 9, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst(USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project(USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally,the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Val Robertson EXHIBIT 1 1 13 it Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2015 9:08 PM To: rick.robertson@stoneside.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Rick Robertson 5645 W 112th Pl Westminster CO 80020 June 9, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst(USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project(USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally,the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site,providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Rick Robertson EXHIBIT 1 CS Diana Aungst From: MM Highway 34 Support[MMHighway34,Info@martinmariettacorn] Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2015 9:03 PM To: MMHighway34Info@MartinMarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Guy zerfoss 865 Eudora st Denver,Colorado 80220 06/09/2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 EXHIBIT I _LIG_ Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project(USR15-0027). As a contractor who has 5 employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components,aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally,the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site,providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! i Sincerely, Guy zerfoss 2 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2015 8:53 PM To: MMHighway34Info@MartinMarietta.com Subject: MM Highway 34 Support Form Gilbert Cruz 1272 Savannah Sparrow Dr. Highlands Ranch Co. 80129 06-09-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst(USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project(USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally,the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Gilbert Cruz EXHIBIT 1 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2015 8:49 PM To: gonzfather1017@gmail.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Eric Gonzales 12801 Lafayette ST H208 Thornton Co. 80241 06-09-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst(USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project(USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally,the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site,providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Eric Gonzales EXHIBIT 1 I at__ Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2015 8:48 PM To: MMHighway34Info@MartinMarietta.com Subject: MM Highway 34 Support Form Boyd Milhorn 1900 s lowell blvd Denver, Co 80219 06/09/15 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst(USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project(USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Boyd Milhorn EXHI IT 1 l3`t Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2015 8:46 PM To: MMHighway34Info@MartinMarietta.com Subject: MM Highway 34 Support Form Timothy Peacher 2500 east Harmony rd. #58 Fort collins CO. 80528 6-9-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst(USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project(USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally,the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Timothy Peacher EXHIBIT 1 i .1441___ Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2015 8:37 PM To: tom.sprinkle@gmail.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Tom Sprinkle 2020 Lawrence st Apt 415 Denver, CO 84060 6/9/15 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst(USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project(USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site,providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Tom Sprinkle EXHIBIT 1 Il_q_l____ Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2015 7:31 PM To: ericashbrook@ymail.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Eric Ashbrook 8326 S.Pierce Way Littleton, Co. 80128 June 8, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst(USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project(USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Eric Ashbrook EXHIBIT 1 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2015 6:55 PM To: thornstein3@gmail.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Timothy 441 Verdant Circle Longmont Co. 80504 06-09-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst(USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project(USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally,the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Timothy EXHIBIT 1 Ltqa- Diana Aungst From: Susan Oplinger[soplinger@mesanetworks.net] Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2015 6:37 PM To: Diana Aungst Subject: Fw: Case USR15-0027 Attachments: FullSizeRender.jpg; FullSizeRender.jpg; FullSizeRender.jpg; FullSizeRender.jpg; FullSizeRender.jpg Original Message From: "Susan Oplinger" <soplinger@mesanetworks.net> To: <daungst@weldgov.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2015 6:30 PM Subject: Case USR15-0027 >Weld County Commissioners and >Weld County Planning Commissioners > do Diana Aungst >Weld County Department of Planning Services > 1555N. 17th Avenue > Greeley, CO 80631 > Planners and Commissioners: >While I have sent you my concerns about the traffic on US 34, I need to > reinforce my concerns with some photos. > I was on my way home from downtown Loveland around 10:30 this morning. I > needed to get my house on Hopi Trail so I could put some groceries away. > I > was scheduled to be at The Medical Center of the Rockies at 11:00. I am a > volunteer in the hospital's surgery center. I was driving on US 34 > heading > East when I had to stop because of a train that was crossing US 34 just > East > of County Road 13. I had to sit and wait for 15 minutes while the train >was > "parked" on the track. I assume they had to change from one track to > another one. I got out of my car and took the photos that I have included >with this e-mail. Once the train started back up, I counted 109 cars and > 3 > engines. Once the train passed, the traffic light on US 34 (at the rail >track) did not change to green. The cars in the front of the line waited > and waited for the light to change before they finally decided that it >wasn't going to change. The line of cars between the train track and > County > Road 17 (traffic light) was almost 2 miles long. > Once home, I put my things away and then headed back to US 34 so I could > drive West to the hospital. While the train had passed, the traffic was > still not moving. The problem was related to the traffic light on US 34 > at > the entrance to Centerra Mall. It was taking a long time for the train > back-up of cars to move through that intersection. > I eventually arrived at the hospital 20 minutes late. The trains don't EXHIBIT > run 1 1 > on any predictable schedule, so I can't plan around that when I need to be > somewhere West of County Road 15. > > I sent these pictures to you on purpose. I wanted you to see what we are > experiencing now on CO 34. I can hardly imagine what it is going to be > like > when Martin Marietta Materials (MMM) has numerous trucks trying to get on > to > US 34. > > To summarize, USR15-0027, if passed, will result in a substantial negative > impact to traffic in this area. The congestion may well result in a > negative impact to residential and commercial development. > > Susan Oplinger > 27687 Hopi Trail > Johnstown, Colorado 80534 > Original Message > From: "Susan Oplinger" <soplinger@mesanetworks.net> > To: <soplinger@mesanetworks. net> > Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2015 2:45 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2 0 I i IM I L..f • I I I I I = t I t �- it a • ..___,...,,c ‘.. i a iiii ,,.,_ .. \ *40**44,44kasi'. ., . MI 4. • . - . ,, _ VI • I" • "I':• Jkilt_-- . ntr 1 , - _ sin-- i., iismi 1 I. F _ v- y Z. _ ; . , r' ' • 1 . ' -- 4.= - 'tip t•-% _ -" kw ' . . J 1 /44 id i . ._ . , 4 .4.00/..06, ,,,-- . in Lips ; Lit v- v. a * a •M Iilli, { Illill IC. 'a I, . le . e I i a I W _ : elle •. f r ' 4 \ I 11111 ■ ) _ . -sue ...... G I 1 = f i It: , I \ t • \\ Cilt ll lin \l‘ I 1.1 \' t ili . y • '' i II :4 ..• d' 1. • . lik1/41 ....• _ I. • Val. ritt ... . „.. ....• .._sr ----•-- ...- big - * +.r=fib a ' , ti_ ••,. WWWWWWWWW la•••••.. 4 ' l : r C 4.1311111111:14111111P8"--ea" o . • 4 1 Niiii .I _ _ ___ _ • • ,:.:,.,•••••:•:•:•:•:••••••••••••••••••• MI . arir .,.• ••••••••••••••• /I 064 . 0F8i'il ' S . -4.4. . . • • • • ...... • - • • ' - t . • _ • • • i� • • I1 A ~ i' I \ , • it 1 { ../Amber 1 • III • . • a III li 11 �1 iY rte . F ...t r •. i 1. :.., \ t 1 III I I ' le I 1 • I I Ii. I t + �!A I I � ' 1 `Y 4 ,, di 0, Y 41�. — J, ON i !may lite . n{ i.A 1 , r . I, I • , i 4. lb \-�I . I . i r 1 ' it 4 1A — I II • I -A s\ :11.• . . ••••• . • - Q IA 111 •r. Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2015 5: 15 PM To: MattCA88@gmail.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Matthew Esquibel 4945 Hahns Peak Dr #104 Loveland, CO 80538 06/09/2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Matthew Esquibel EXHIBIT 1 Ward Living, LLC P.O. Box 265 Loveland, CO 80539-0265 June 10, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-OO27) Weld County Planning 1555 N . 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners : As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project ( USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, % r Ward Living, LLC EXHIBIT 2 Diana Aungst From: MM Highway 34 Support [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 4:44 PM To: MMHighway34Info@MartinMarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Mark Axness 707 East Fox Farm Road Unit 1 Cheyenne, WY 82007 6- 10-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 EXHIBIT 1 _AL Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta' s Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). As a contractor who has 46 employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! 1 Sincerely, Mark Axness 2 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 9:25 AM To: MMHighway34Info@MartinMarietta.com Subject: MM Highway 34 Support Form Justin Prueter 3730 Osceola St. Denver, CO 80212 6/10/2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Justin Prueter wool Diana Aungst From: Russ Roberson [Russ@drgonyon.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 4:07 PM To: Diana Aungst; Mike Freeman; Julie Cozad; Barbara Kirkmeyer; Sean Conway; Steve Moreno; tdonnelly@larimer.org; mlafferty@larimer.org Cc: Denis Gonyon; clr34na@gmail.com Subject: RE: Proposed Asphalt Plant at Hwy 34 and WCR13 Good afternoon . As the administrator for Dr. Gonyon's various business entities, I would like to reiterate the concerns he outlines below regarding odor, traffic and general negative impact on the surrounding homes and businesses. I recognize the fact that this area is growing very quickly and there is a need to have construction materials in a location that is convenient and cost effective. However, it is my opinion that the proposed location of this plant will have an extremely detrimental effect on the surrounding community and could significantly impede further development in the area . If I were building a house or developing a commercial property today there is no way I would consider our current location if there was an asphalt plant within a mile. Additionally, there is an operational plant of this nature located within a few miles of this proposed site just south of Harmony Road along 1-25. I drive by it daily and find it to be a visual eyesore and I would hate to have the same view for our clients as they enter/exit our building. As you may be aware, there has recently been news in Fort Collins regarding residential complaints about an asphalt plant located near their neighborhood which is also operated by Martin Marietta. Nothing I've read about this sounds very good for the residents and 1 would hate to see a plant like this located so close to the businesses I'm responsible to manage. I would strongly urge you to consider the negative impact of this plant and ask that you take the necessary steps to prevent the rezoning that would allow its construction. Thank you for your consideration. Regards, Russ Roberson Practice Administrator Gonyon Cosmetic and Plastic Surgery, PC 25/34 Cosmetic and Plastic Surgery institute, LLC 25/34 Medical Professional Offices, LLC 4450 Union Street, Suite 100 Johnstown, CO 80534 EXHIBIT 970-624-7979 main 970-624-7980 fax b g ILI 9 www.drgonyon .com a From: Denis Gonyon Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 1 : 56 PM To: mfreeman@weldgov.com; jcozad@weldgov.com; bkirkmeyer@weldgov.com; sconway@weldgov.com; smoreno@weldgov.com; tdonnelly@larimer.orq; mlafferty@larimer.org Subject: Proposed Ashphalt Plant at Hwy 34 and WCR13 Dear Elected Officials, I would like contact you directly to express my concerns about the proposed asphalt plant at highway 34 and county road 13 at the junctions of Larimer and Weld County. As a home owner and a business owner in close proximity to this location, I have significant concerns about the impact on the environment, traffic, and my business as the result of placing this type of industrial business will have. Having had experience with asphalt plants in the past, they generate pollution and odor no matter how effective and efficient the air handling systems may be. I would strongly encourage you to go to United Asphalt in Commerce City, Colorado, and see for yourself what "odorless" and "clean" production 1 smells and looks like. I am concerned that based on past interactions with this developer, the risks of this type of plant are being minimized and the benefits to the community are being highly exaggerated. Respectfully, I would only ask that you perform your due diligence in researching this topic thoroughly before committing to allowing the developer to proceed with a project that could potentially have a very damaging effect on both the local business environment but also the community as a whole. Thank you. Regards, Dr. Denis Gonyon Denis Gonyon , MD Gonyon Cosmetic & Plastic Surgery, PC 4450 Union St , Suite 100 Johnstown , CO 80534 Office : ( 970 ) 624-7979 Fax : ( 970 ) 624-7980 drgonyonOdrgonyon . corn CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail is privileged and confidential, and is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, electronic storage or use of this communication is prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, attaching the original message, and delete the original message from your computer and any network to which your computer is connected. 2 Diana Aungst Subject: FW: Heavy Industry Protest Original Message From: Julie Cozad Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 8:31 AM To: Tom Parko Jr. Cc: Walter Fenton Subject: FW: Heavy Industry Protest From: Walter Fenton "mailto:scott fenton55Amsn.comj Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2015 11 :34 AM To: Julie Cozad Subject: Heavy Industry Protest Dear, Julie, Unfortunately I can not attend the next meeting , because I am in Tennessee. It is obvious that with 300 voters and concerned citizens, that The rezoning of this area ,for heavy industry is not wanted, nor is it viewed as any kind of a benefit to those of us ie; Indianhead Estates and 25-34 corridor! Of course there are those people like NOCO-HBA , who are not directly Affected, but will financially gain, from discounted materiels costs, and who are in favor of this project 1 , because it is not being built on top of their homes and farmlands! I know that if you let Martin Marrieta and Envior- Tech become established, they will DESTROY our area, and that more heavy industry will move in to the newly rezoned properties . So by allowing one heavy industrial corporation to build , all the rest will follow! Creating ALL of the afore mentioned problems, traffic, pollution, noise , ugly structures , that will spoil our pristine environment and MAR the credibility of WELD County Commissioners, and their ability to make Just decisions, involving the future planning of the 25-34 Corridor, this burden lies on all , of the elected officials , those present or those who hope to retain their jobs with the future! How many people have to voice their personal , objections to these projects , before these huge Corporations will go somewhere else? After all Weld County, is the Largest in Colorado and already one of the MOST POSPEROUS! ! ! Scott Scott Fenton cell - 303-594-9832 home - 970-203-9275 email - Scott Fenton@msn.com <mailto:Scott Fenton@msn.com> www.fentonsfineart.com <http://www.fentonsfineart.com> EXHIBIT I ---LtIO___ ti 1 Diana Aungst From: MM Highway 34 Support [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 1 :46 PM To: MMHighway34lnfo@MartinMarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Rich Anchustegui 8591 Prairie Trail Dr. Suite 100 Englewood, CO 80112 6/10/2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 EXHIBIT 1 ( Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). As a contractor who has 280 employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! 1 Sincerely, Rich Anchustegui 2 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 2:01 PM To: aimee@redekerinc.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Aimee DeGraffenried 2931 NUS Hwy 85 Castle Rock, CO 80109 06/10/2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 EXHIBIT In Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). As a contractor who has 20 employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! 1 Sincerely, Aimee DeGraffenried 2 Diana Aungst Subject: FW: MMM Meeting on 6-69-15 Greeley Tribune Story Dear Editor, Wednesday's Greeley Tribune story about MMM 's proposal to build a large concrete and asphalt batch plant just south of US34 and WCR-15 is strongly opposed by virtually all of the residents of this rural area between Johnstown and Loveland. Consider how this would impact your home including 24/7 operation, visual, odor, noise, health & loss of lifestyle concerns. Our neighborhood borders this dirty, noisy industrial proposal . What should really concern the citizens of Greeley and surrounding area are traffic and compatibility. Anyone that travels US-34 during peak morning or evening hours, or any weekend, knows that traffic stoppage is already backed up to far east of Centera . Hundreds of heavy trucks associated with this site just in the morning and afternoon peak because of this proposed plant to the current traffic flow. MMM's answer? Add another traffic light on US-34, where 95% of their planned heavy truck traffic will enter US34. MMM has several alternatives. Jobs will not be lost, neither will county tax revenue. US34 from the west is the last unspoiled gateway to Greeley. MMM and Mayor Norton seem okay to also turn this gateway to another industrial area, ruining the last good entry. Tell Mayor Norton that both the citizens of this area and of Greeley want to preserve responsible, collaborative land use, and don't want to add a huge daily traffic jam on the drive in or to from Loveland. As the story states, the first facility will bring even more heavy industrial development to that area . Email Diana Aungst at Weld County Planning, (daungst@weldgov) and oppose this USR. We are not Nimby's. Alternatives exist, and development of agricultural business, residential, recreational, retail, or light commercial that is more in character and to long range planning. Compatibility is key for us, to Indianhead Estates, and everyone. Pete & Susie Straub Rural Loveland From: petestraub@msn.com Subject: MMM Meeting on 6-69- 15 Greeley Tribune Story Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 09:39:28 -0600 Neighbors, Below is our story this AM in Greeley Tribune. (Pete's note - my new concern is Greeley Mayor Torn Norton who favors making our area an industrial area. I will follow up to a letter to the editor addressing this today.) Note on last night, probably 100+ people showed up, mostly very emotional, upset. MMM had full guns, even a "disinterested facilitator" . EXHIBIT From last night; b 1 • MMM Claims all Air/Smoke/Emissions/Particulates will be negligble due to enhanced revised filtering equipment. • Increased height/length of berms. (we pointed out lack of landscape or covering on berms) • Claims all noise is below regulation • Claims a ramped up business thru 2017 when it will be complete. Up to 12XX RT's per day of trucks, trucks, trucks. • Includes now accelleration/deaccelleration lanes on 34 and WCR 15 • Reroute of on site rail tracks to push rail loop —470' further away from neighborhood • Plan includes a community advisory group to monitor operations. Very emotional crowd was not pleased at push to develop. We need everyones active participation and help! The folks that are consistent in this issue will tire out if we dont help them. Unbeleivable traffic is coming, noise, dust, etc. (Dave, can you share with others?) Pete Straub West Weld County development proposal draws criticism from planners, residents A western Weld County development proposal isn 't receiving the welcome that often comes with new business coming to an area . Despite its potential to bring 100 jobs, Martin Marietta 's proposed asphalt and concrete plant hasn 't seemed to garner much support. Planners from a handful of municipalities are pushing against it while politicians deliberate . In a work session on Tuesday, the Greeley City Council discussed the Martin Marietta plan, but took no action other than planning further talks . The company hosted a community meeting with residents on Tuesday night, as well . Locals have started weighing in on the potential $20 million , 131 -acre facility off of U . S . 34 near County Road 15 . Planners in the city of Greeley and the town of Windsor have said the construction " isn 't consistent" with their vision for the area , and residents from a housing addition near the site have lamented the proposal . The planners pictured a less industrial , more " neighborhood-oriented " feel for the plot, which straddles Larimer County and encompasses rural housing and farmland . Staff from both municipalities have submitted letters to the Weld County Planning Department, which outline their vision and urge careful consideration . Some residents fear air and sound pollution will decrease their quality of life and their homes' value . In 2008 , Greeley and Windsor entered into an amended intergovernmental agreement, which allowed them to cooperatively identify land -use patterns for the U . S . 34 corridor. 2 The area is technically out of the towns' jurisdictions because it isn 't in their city limits . But the project would affect both municipalities, Brad Mueller told The Tribune before the city's Tuesday meeting . Mueller is Greeley's community development director and deals with the city's long -term planning . To build on the site, Martin Marietta has to obtain a land - use permit from Weld County . Much of the plot is zoned for agricultural use, but the company needs it to be zoned industrial . The county planning commission is slated to decide whether to approve the change July 21 . Greeley doesn 't have an authoritative voice in the permit process, but city staff helps advise " in the spirit of observation , " Mueller said . The corridor serves as a gateway into Greeley, Windsor and Johnstown , he told the council during the meeting . Planners feel anxious about the county granting an industrial permit use there because one usually spurs more, Mueller said . A legal precedent isn 't set, but land - use permits "set the tone" for permits in the surrounding area . Greeley Mayor Tom Norton argued that industrial use seemed imminent because of the infrastructure in the area . "Along railroads, you 're going to have industrial areas, " Norton said during the meeting . "You 've got to be able to utilize the railroad tracks. " He pointed out that Greeley has a need for more asphalt and concrete, but he wasn 't resolute in his approval for the plan . "I need to understand more how it's going to affect the city of Greeley in the long run , " he told The Tribune . Johnstown , on the other hand , is resolute . Its planners also were against the development, which is just south of the town . The city council is considering a resolution to denounce the plant, Mueller told the Greeley City Council during the meeting . The Martin Marietta Corporation held a community meeting Tuesday night, which included a question-and -answer session, and were met by disgruntled Weld County residents . Regional manager David Hagerman represented Martin Marietta . He discussed the company's health, noise, water quality and wildlife studies, but the crowd was skeptical . Some yelled expletives during the session . Residents voiced their health - related fears of lung damage from concrete dust and possible toxins from asphalt production . 3 "We've had one medical doctor that is reviewing the factors developed from our emissions model , " Hagerman said . "We have a second toxicologist that is reviewing the data to verify it. " Despite Hagerman 's efforts, the crowd hardly wavered . Many laughed at his responses . Some called the plan criminal . This meeting was Martin Marietta 's second community outreach effort regarding the proposal off U . S . 34 . The city of Greeley will further discuss the plan during its June 23 work session meeting . Norton told the council during Tuesday's meeting he plans to meet with Martin Marietta representatives for more information . The county has more than a month to continue investigating whether to grant the land- use permit . — Reporter Emma Pettit contributed to this report. 4 RECF ! Vrn Miles Kaplanides JUN 11 2015 4249 Woodlake Lane Wellington, CO 80549 Weld County Planning uepd, u eiR GREELEY OFFICE June 8, 2015 Weld County Board of Commissioners 1150 O Street Post Office Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 Dear Weld County Board of Commissioners : This letter is in support of the possible Highway 34 Project in Weld County. This project has so many positives in my opinion, I hope there are many more who support this project. Positives I see are as follows • Employment for Colorado Residents with a good wage. • Tax Revenue for Weld County. • Keeping costs down for all fields ( Residential, Road Building, Energy) that require aggregate in Northern Colorado. • Keeping roads maintained more economically than by using aggregate from outside the area. • This will help stimulate business for suppliers and sub-contractors within the construction industry Thank you for your consideration regarding this possible Project. I think it is a good thing in Weld County. Sincerely, .►�� aplanides EXHIBIT 2 Diana Aungst From: Kathleen Quam [quambk@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 11 :05 PM To: Diana Aungst Subject: Case # USR 15-0027 # USR 15-0027 For Public Record June 10, 2015 Weld County Commissioners Weld County Department of Planning Services RE: Planing application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development As you travel west on the Hwy 34 corridor just past WCR 15 at the top of the hill, sits a "WELCOME TO COLORADO" sign on the north side of the highway. This is a wonderful place where visiting tourists to our beautiful State of Colorado will stop and take pictures beside the "Welcome to Colorado" sign with the majestic Rocky Mountains in the background. As they descend the hill, still in awe of the breathtaking scenery, they look to the south and again, they are absolutely breathless. Not by the beauty, but by the ugliness of what they are looking at in the midst of all the beauty The Martin Marietta asphalt, concrete plant. What? How can this be? Who would allow such an industry in this unspoiled area of such beauty? Keep Northern Colorado and the Gateway to the Rockies beautiful. Vote NO on USR 15-0027 Kathleen Quam Indianhead Estates EXHIBIT 1 I jail Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Thursday, June 11 , 2015 9:57 AM To: tbranhan1973@gmail.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Tara Branham 2450 Emerald St Loveland, CO 80357 6-11 -15 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Tara Branham EXHIBIT 1 IS Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Thursday, June 11 , 2015 11 : 14 AM To: pmcgee57@gmail.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Paula McGee 3097 S. Gilpin St Denver, CO 80210 6/11/15 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Paula McGee EXHIBIT 15 n Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Thursday, June 11 , 2015 1 :51 PM To: jruchten@hotmail.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Josh Kruchten 9100 Harlequin Cir Frederick, CO 80504 June 11, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of. Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Josh Kruchten EXHIBIT 1 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Thursday, June 11 , 2015 2:43 PM To: aclem@amwestcon.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Andrew Clem 275 E. 64th Ave Denver, CO 80221 June 11 , 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 EXHIBIT I Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). As a contractor who has 92 employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region' s ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! 1 Sincerely, Andrew Clem 2 Diana Aungst From: MM Highway 34 Support [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 5:35 PM To: MMHighway34Info@MartinMarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form David Kasperbauer 5300 Longs Peak Road Berthoud, CO 80513 6/10/15 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 EXHIBIT I (JAI_ Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta' s Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). As a contractor who has 50 employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! 1 Sincerely, David Kasperbauer 2 � r ......61140, Crte,ec,es cam s Wellington, CO Waldo Trucking, Inc. 9925 Waldo Lane Wellington, CO 80549 June 11 , 2015 Weld County Commissioners ct.c Diana Aungst (USR 15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N_ 17" Avenue Greeley, Co 8063 I Dear Weld County Cotrirnissioners, I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 project (IISR 15-00?7)_ As a contractor who has 4 employees. the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt. ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and ‘s ill keep costs down. which in turn allows me to keep my costs timer. If these materials arc not available, it s ill have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees_ We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and .job creation for the region. [he project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth income in this area by providing one of the basic building components. aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally. the project will allow needed na ltii'af retieDeiiccN la he imported by train to the site. providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances While 1 recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations.. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's I iighsgat 34 Project and look forward to your response! ,�,. EXHIBIT Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Thursday, June 11 , 2015 8:46 PM To: MMHighway34Info@MartinMarietta.com Subject: MM Highway 34 Support Form Brad Hixson 705 E. Ridgecrest Rd. Fort Collins, Co. 80524 6/10/15 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Brad Hixson EXHIBIT 1 RFCEIVED June 6, zoo , JUN 092015 Weld County Planning Council Weld County Planing uepaitment c/o Diana Aungst GREELEY OFFICE Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Members of the Weld County Planning Council: I am writing this letter to oppose Martin Marietta's construction of a concrete, asphalt, and aggregate crushing plant on WCR 13, one half mile south of Highway 34. My name is Diane Reid and I own 30 acres on WCR 15; my western boundary abuts the proposed site. My property is currently farmed by my cousin who lives one half mile from the site. I also have two uncles who live within % mile of the proposed site. My family home was a dairy farm located at the junction of WCR 15 and WCR 56. The 30 acres I own was part of that operation. I want to reiterate what I wrote to you in a letter I sent in January. The costs to Weld County for this plant will be far greater than the benefits. The plant is a 130-acre behemoth and it will employ only 100 people. You can't event guarantee that those jobs will go to people who reside in Weld County. The taxes Weld County will receive from Martin Marietta will not begin to cover the damage done to local infrastructure. These roads are not designed to support significant traffic from massive haulers. These trucks will be entering and leaving hundreds of times a day and will be trying to access Hwy. 34 to the north with no traffic light and 402 one mile to the south, which is a two-lane paved road. The traffic nightmare which will be created on Highway 34 because of the trucks and rail traffic will be monumental. This type of development is completely incompatible with existing development. You have light industry in Kelim, and this is the only local industry. One mile west in Larimer County, more high-end residential development is occurring. You not only have Indianhead Estates, which abuts the proposed Martin- Marietta development, you have a residential development just to the west of CR 15 where CR 56 meets CR 15. There is an organic farm less than a half-mile to the south of the proposed plant, and this person's livelihood will be ruined. Property values will plummet for current residents. Heavy industry will condemn the current owners' property. You need to look to the future and decide what kind of development you want to see over the next thirty to forty years along Colorado Boulevard, because that is what CR 13 will become. You have an opportunity now to capitalize on the prosperous development occurring at the 34/25 interchange; this development is moving east. If you support Martin Marietta's proposal you will stop this kind of development in its tracks. Heavy industry will permanently condemn property for several miles on either side of the proposed MM site. I can't imagine that Johnstown would support this, and Weld County won't be a good neighbor to Larimer County and their current development. EXHIBIT This brings me to my final point, and it is one that I doubt anyone else will address. My family began farming in that area in the late 1950s. The land is heavily sloped and sits below the Greeley-Loveland Ditch and the Farmer's Ditch. The water table is extremely high. Local farmers, all of whom are now deceased, knew that in the early 20th century an elaborate system of drains was constructed in all those fields. These drains are still functional. As far back as 1959, there were no available site maps of these drains, but every farmer knew that they had a significant effect on the movement of water in their fields. The person who farmed the proposed Martin-Marietta site was regularly dealing with unusual water flow patterns in those fields. I have looked at the site map for the Martin-Marietta plant. Although there is a proposed drainage pond, I contend that they will never be able to effectively manage the drainage issues because these drains affect the entire site. What will be moving into the water systems? The Thompson River is only a quarter mile south and Koenig Reservoir, a wetlands area, borders the property in question. Weld County does not need to promote the creation of a new Commerce City. Approval for Martin- Marietta to build this plant would forever condemn this prime property and all property two miles to the east and two miles to the west. The effects of this decision go far beyond the immediate neighborhood. Allowing the construction of this plant would prevent prime commercial and residential development along Colorado Boulevard. You can gain tax dollars for Weld County and not condemn the area in the process. Please do not allow Martin-Marietta or any heavy industry to invade this area. Sincerely, tzp %.0e 4fedc..e., Diane Schwalm Reid dreid3014@gmail.com 502-681-2886 June 8, 2015 RECEIVED Diana Aungst JUN 11 2015 Ref. PRE-0322 Weld County Dept. of Planning Services Wetd County Planning ue 1555 N 17th Ave. pa, u„et« GREELEY OFFICE Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Members of the Planning Commission: As a Weld County Property Owner on CR 15, just south of Hwy. 34, my 30 acres sits next to the proposed Martin Marietta concrete/asphalt batch plant on CR 13 (soon to be Colorado Blvd.). I have written before, but want to reiterate several points as you make this decision. Traffic patterns: • A conservative truck traffic estimate would be 700 trucks a day between 7 a.m. and 5 p.m. This means that 70 trucks an hour--more than one truck a minute-- would be traveling to and from the plant. • Even with the installation of a traffic light at CR 13 and Hwy. 34, you will disrupt traffic on 34. Traffic on 402 to the south will also be affected. If a train is also backing up traffic on 34, consider the impact on 34, especially at peak times. During mid-day, a farmer moving equipment across Hwy. 34 currently waits at least 15 minutes to cross. • This will affect more than the local residents. It will affect ALL who travel 34 regularly. Damage to infrastructure: • The taxes paid by Martin Marietta will not begin to cover the damage to roads and infrastructure. This will also affect Larimer County residents. It will cost Weld County money. Lack of Compatibility with Current Population • This heavy industry is not compatible with residential areas which abut the property. There are also residential areas less than a mile to the east off CR 15 and less than a mile to the west in Larimer County. • No other heavy industry is present in the area. • Compatibility requires that no one living/working in the area will have to make significant life changes. The toxicity, the noise, light and ground water pollution, and the traffic patterns will have a significant effect on the well-being of current residents. These are not minor inconveniences; these changes impact health and well-being on a daily basis. Before you make a decision on this issue, I strongly suggest that you visit the area. Visit during peak traffic times on Hwy. 34. See how residential this area has become. Consider that you are making a choice that will forever change, not just this immediate area, but Johnstown and Colorado Boulevard development. Go south one-half mile on CR 15 from Hwy. 34 and stop at the bridge over the Greeley-Loveland ditch. You will be at the corner of my property overlooking Koenig Reservoir with Longs Peak in the distance. The view is breath-taking. You have the power to permanently condemn ALL of this with one stroke of the pen. Development is coming, but heavy industry is not the choice you should make. Sincerely, G(,1Ci� VilcoatAc C c c' Diane Schwalm Reid 502-681-2886 dreid@ius.edu EXHIBIT June 8, 201S RECEIVED JUN 11 2015 Weld County Commissioners Weld County Planning C/O Diana Aungst, MCP, CFM Planner ll GREELEY OFFICE rtment Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Planning Application USR 15-0027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development Dear Ms. Aungst. My wife and I are asking you to deny the Martin Marietta application USR 15-0027 to construct their asphalt, cement, and aggregate facility. The following are our reasons: • The facility would be a health, and safety concern for ail Weld citizens traveling or living within a radius of several miles of the WCR 34 and 13 areas. If the facility is allowed, only similar types of business would build in this area, resulting in a Commerce City type area . Hotels, restaurants, Gyms, Health facilities, and similar business would avoid this location. Asphalt Plant: • It has been proven that the facility would produce malodorous smells, toxic gases and cancer causing heavy metals that would contaminate our air and ground water, if not reduced to zero. It is my understanding, by internet research, this is not possible. • Citizens Against Asphalt Toxins (CHAT), located in Fort Collins, has conducted studies on asphalt production and has stated that these facilities deposit toxic emissions within a two (2) mile radius from the site. • The EPA has stated that asphalt processing facilities are major sources of hazardous air pollutants such as hexane, phenol, formaldehyde, polycyclic organic matter, and toluene. Exposure to these air toxics may cause cancer, central nervous system problems, liver damage, respiratory problems, and skin irritation. Cement Plant emissions detrimental to the area : • One reason why the carbon emissions are so high is because cement has to be heated to very high temperatures in order for a clinker( to the manufacture of Portland cement clinker occurs as lumps or nodules, usually 3 millimetres (0. 12 in) to 25 millimetres (0.98 in) in diameter, produced by sintering (fused together without melting to the point of liquification) limestone and alumina-silicate materials such as clay during off the cement kiln stage.)to form. A major culprit of this is alite (Ca3SiO5), a mineral in concrete that cures within hours of pouring and is therefore responsible for much of its initial strength. EXHIBIT 1 • The concrete industry is one of two largest producers of carbon dioxide (CO2), creating up to 5% of worldwide man-made emissions of this gas, of which 50% is from the chemical process and 40% from burning fuel. I do not know what type of fuel would be used. • 'Other emissions from a cement plant are sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides which result in haze. Say goodbye to your view of the Front Range. Aggregate Plant: • An aggregate plant coarse aggregate production line commonly consists of vibratory feeders, jaw crushers, straight impact crushers (sand maker), vibratory screens, sand washers, belt conveyors, centralized electronic control device, etc. • The mud, silt, fine dust, sulfates and organic matter which is contained in the coarse aggregate are all detrimental impurities and must be removed by blowing , washing away, or trucking off site. • Cement noise mainly from the mill, air compressor, blower , high pressure centrifugal fans , crushers, pumps and other equipment. These devices near the noise level of 90 decibels or more generally. • High pressure centrifugal fan noise at 100 decibels, the number of large cement plant fan, fan noise is relatively prominent. • The 24/7 operation of these machines noise and vibration would be annoying to human residents in the area and could be detrimental to wildlife. • Trains and trucks hauling these products in and out of the facility would add traffic congestion, additional noise, and toxic fumes close to residential and business areas. Martin Marietta Materials is owned by Lockheed Martin. Lockheed Martin has a current value of over 63 Billion dollars. Martin Marietta Materials has a book value of over 8.5 Billion dollars. They can find another location that would not turn this area on Weld County Highway 34 into an industrial cesspool, resulting in health, traffic, and safety concerns to citizens of Weld County and Northern Colorado. Sincerely, /17c1 r • Jeanne & enn DePriest 6894 Algonquin Drive Johnstown, CO 80534 4depriest@msn.com 970-663-1315 • RECFIVFD JUN 11 2015 Weld County ucpa, lment GREELEY OFFICE Richard and Karen Ford P.O. Box 327 Bellvue, CO 80512 6/8/15 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-OO27) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Ave. Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners, We are writing to express our full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). We understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. We, however, will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave our streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost, as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. We urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, 0,44' r-la R4"ase-- Karen and Richard Ford EXHIBIT Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 7:50 AM To: Iuke@denverdirtworks.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Luke Morris 8042 Lakehsore Dr. Parker, CO 80134 6/12/2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 EXHIBIT 1 AO__ Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). As a contractor who has 12 employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region' s ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! 1 Sincerely, Luke Morris 2 Diana Aun st From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHi hwa Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 5:42 AM g Y34.Info@martinmarietta.com] To: MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MM Highway 34 Support Form lanette garcia 2624 adobe dr fort cillins co 80525 6 12 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR 15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17`h Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin 0027). Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USRI5- I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns o benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave ver the project. I, however, am one who will economic growth through housing and business development. Themy streets, build new retail centers and increase railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suitedp act site is located between two active for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost infrastructure required to support the Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be as compared to importing materials. Local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing mat �r this Irrlported by train to the site, providing a erlal from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look J forward to your response! Sincerely, lanette garcia EXHIBIT 1 I a Weld County residents worry about Martin Marietta asphalt plant Search A vANNETT COMPANY Asphalt plant proposal draws fire in Weld County f 31 a Kevin Duggan, Coloradoan '? 09 a n u a 9 %0 6 f31 # 6 in , 3 Pal .:O'1V_LI ii.+ EET L I'aKCU J C:G;ilh:Er7 EA! I MORE. in WELD COUNTY — Battle lines are being drawn over Its a proposed asphalt and concrete distribution center along the Weld/Larimer county line about a half mile r y south of U.S. Highway 34. • 3 (Photo Erin Hull/The Coforadoan) On one side is Martin Marietta, one of the largest suppliers of heavy construction materials in the country, which wants to build the facility on a 133-acre site just off Weld County Road 13. The $20 million project would include a rail loop to handle trains bringing in raw materials, separate plants to produce asphalt and ready-mix concrete, storage tanks for liquid asphalt and piles of rock of various sizes. On the other side are neighbors of the site concerned about how the facility would affect their quality of life. Nearby communities with long-range visions for how the U.S. 34 corridor should develop also are raising concerns. For neighbors, the issues with Martin Marietta's proposal are numerous, said Dave Kisker, president of CLR-34 Neighborhoods Association, including noise, traffic; dust, i odors and the impact on property values. And then there's the visual impact the facility would have on the surrounding area, which at the moment is primarily agricultural with some residential development. EXHIBIT Kisker lives in the Indianhead Estates subdivision, which sits northeast of the site. The I view from the western edge of the subdivision is dominated by green fields and the s http://www coloradoan com/story/news/2015/06/09/martin-marietta-asphalt-plant-draws-fire/28725195/(6/9/2015 11:32:44 AM] Weld County residents worry about Martin Marietta asphalt plant I, towering peaks of the Front Range. a .. ..,...... Ti .oJ. "It all comes down to a matter of compatibility," Kisker said. "There is no way a heavy industrial operation like this is compatible with a residential neighborhood." MORE STORIES Most Fort Collins _ - -- commuters drive Toyotas, taml don't bike ,,, -.— June 8, 2015, 9:41 p.m. Passenger service may return to Fort Collins r airport June 8, 2015, 9:27 p.m. Women's World Cup watch Impacts of the $20 million facility worry Weld County residents Kevin Duggan/The Coloradoan party se. ) June 8, 2015, 7:20 p.m. For Martin Marietta, the facility is needed to meet demand for construction materials in the face of rapid growth in Larimer and Weld counties. Roads, schools and homes will have to be built to handle the influx of people and businesses to the area, said David Hagerman, a regional vice president with Martin Marietta and project manager for the proposed facility. BUILDING GROWTH: NoCo building permits can't keep up with growth Keeping up with demand for materials is a challenge for the company, Hagerman said. Deposits of rock needed to go into asphalt and concrete are being depleted from local river systems, so materials must be brought in from other locations. The region's economic vitality has been helped over the years by the ready availability of construction materials, he said. Bringing in materials by rail is about 25 percent less expensive than by truck. Having a distribution center close to the highway system — in this case, U.S. 34 and http://www.coloradoan.com/story/news/2015/06/09/martin-marietta-asphalt-plant-draws-fire/2872519546/9/2015 11 :32:44 AM J Weld County residents worry about Martin Marietta asphalt plant Interstate 25 — is critical for holding down construction costs, he said. "The biggest thing with construction materials is freight and transportation costs," Hagerman said. "The farther materials have to be brought, the more expensive it becomes because of the freight." Major production For the proposed Highway 34 Operations, as Martin Marietta calls the facility, rock would be brought from a quarry in Wyoming on a Union Pacific Railroad line. Trains would be switched from the main line to a 7,200-foot loop track on the property. Approximately 117 cars and four locomotives would make up each train. One to three trains a week would come to the site. Cars would creep along the track to an unloading site at the south end of the property, Hagerman said. The cars would be unloaded from the bottom in an effort to keep down the noise. Each train would carry the equivalent materials of 400 trucks. After sorting and processing, finished products would be trucked to work sites in Fort Collins, Loveland and Greeley. IN FORT COLLINS: Agreement reached on Poudre River asphalt plant The facility would operate six days a week, primarily during daylight hours. However, during the peak of construction season, demand from customers might require night operations, Hagerman said. Martin Marietta officials have met with neighbors to talk about their concerns. But nearby residents hold little hope that the company's attempts to mitigate noise and other impacts from the operations will make much difference, said Wolfgang Dirks, president of the Indianhead Estates Homeowners Association. Dirks said his home is about 30 feet higher than the project site. The 10-foot berm proposed by Martin Marietta to block noise and residents' view of the site would have little effect, he said. Rail operations would be about 600 feet from his house. The noise from the train, which is likely to include the squeal of wheels as cars move along the track, would be "an incredible racket," he said. "It would be such a mess," Dirks said. "And this isn't just about us. Think about all of the people who live around here." http://www.coloradoan.com/story/news/2015/06/09/martin-marietta-asphalt-plant-draws-tire/28725 195/[619/2015 I I :32:44 AM] Weld County residents worry about Martin Marietta asphalt plant Martin Marietta looked at a dozen sites before settling on the Weld County 13 property. The company needed rail access and enough space for a rail loop and various production operations, Hagerman said. The company also wanted good access to highways that did not require its truck drivers to go through school zones or to pass in front of subdivisions. Other sites that were considered were too small or restricted, he said. Most of the truck traffic from the facility would head north to U.S. 34. Martin Marietta plans to place a traffic signal at the intersection of Weld County 13 and the highway to ease the flow of traffic. Neighbors contend other sites along the Union Pacific line in Weld County would work just as well. Rodney Smith, who has lived nine years at Indianhead Estates, said he plans to move if Martin Marietta's proposal is approved by Weld County officials. "If they come in, I'm going out," he said. "If this is approved Aug. 12, I think there will be at least six 'for sale' signs in this neighborhood on Aug. 13." The distribution facility would be a first for Martin Marietta in Colorado, Hagerman said. Its development would not affect operations at other company sites, such as the asphalt plant and mining operation on North Taft Hill Road in Fort Collins. In Texas, rail-fed distribution centers coexist with high-end neighborhoods and commercial areas, Hagerman said. "Across the country, we have a lot of operations that are next to residential areas," he said. "We believe they can be compatible and we really strive to be good neighbors." AGRICULTURE: Local food fights for seat at table Broader issues Martin Marietta is seeking an amendment to the site-specific development plan for the property through Weld County's "use by special review" process. The company plans to lease the property from the owner, Gerrard Investments LLC. Gerrard owns a 42-acre parcel on the "front" property off Weld County 13 and is in the process of acquiring the "back" 89.5 acres, Hagerman said. Martin Marietta would conti nue using buildings on the property and construct new structures on the property, which is already zoned industrial. http://www.coloradoan.com/story/news/2015/06/09/martin-marietta-asphalt-plant-draws-fire/2872519546/9/2015 1 I :32:44 AM] Weld County residents worry about Martin Marietta asphalt plant If county officials approve Martin Marietta's request, construction on the site would begin late this year. A ready-mix plant would be built in early 2016, followed by the rail line later in the year. An asphalt plant would be built in 2017, Hagerman said. Neighbors note that the owner of the 130-acre property to the north of the Martin Marietta project, Weld 34 LLC, is seeking a change in zoning for the land from agricultural to industrial. Kisker said residents of Indianhead Estates expected the bucolic setting near their homes to be developed at some point, but not with industrial projects. To the west sit retail and office developments associated with the Centerra and 2534 developments along 1-25. Long-range land use plans by Johnstown, Windsor and Greeley project having residential and commercial development along the U.S. 34 corridor. In a joint letter to Weld County planners, Greeley and Windsor officials stated the proposal is contrary to a long-held vision for the area. The letter urged "careful consideration for the proposed use and its regional impact." "With the proposed scale and location, this proposal may frustrate that vision, or at least contribute to the beginnings of a land use pattern with significant impacts to the gateway into the City of Greeley and Town of Windsor," the letter stated. TOURISM: NoCo building permits can't keep up with growth Placing industrial uses within the U.S. 34 corridor would be detrimental to the area's economic future, Kisker said. "To restrict the potential of this land does not make sense," Kisker said. Kevin Duggan is a Coloradoan senior reporter covering local government. Follow him on Twitter, @coloradoan_dugg. 9 New Martin Marietta faciliv 8 r , ._ • http://www.coloradoan.com/story/news/2015/06/09/martin-marietta-asphalt-plant-draws-fire/2872519546/9/2015 11 :32:44 AM] Weld County residents worry about Martin Marietta asphalt plant lw w i .� • A ; ' f r /4' •' ,_,1' . ' t: . _ rI r _ • i , • 1 ,i„ - .*F ► A. A . �•I �+ . �, 1 41 r Yilli Illfri VI ; ‘ -ir . )44 I j v•,.. 4 < rM 1 ,t,\, ,I. !. ,,, ' . \ r., ,rte j�J 04 0 _� k . \\ i ,. th: !•. �� , .. ,� ,, @,,..:,7 and Excavating -1 .` - jir i .. \ '\\\\ . 'lit La i i 1°4 1 1 1 o i N. � i 1/4 h N `► r le F. r�. ,. 5h l t 5 J1N � Vs kit; ' e .4 ,1 _a_______..) t „I y Farm A r It IS t -Mil- Map data ©2015 Google Imagery©2015 , Di.italGlobe, USDA Far Service A.ency T , i ,_-., ► ~. � ,. t l ' ti ` I Northern Colorado L Synthetics 1/4 `� - 'rop., ighway � :, ' � , ! , Le. Q` I L • 4el:141 i . 9 ra ti ) :,.. F 1 4d* . JO 4 • Iii , �� •2,200 trips: Projected daily traffic in 20 years •$20 million: Cost of the project Source: Martin Marietta http://www.coloradoan.com/story/news/2015/06/09/martin-marietta-asphalt-plant-draws-fire/2872519546/9/2015 11 :32:44 AM] Weld County residents worry about Martin Marietta asphalt plant What's next The Weld County Planning Commission is scheduled to consider the Highway 34 Operations proposal July 21 . The commission will make a recommendation to the Weld County commissioners, who are scheduled to hear the proposal Aug. 12. Online information: •Weld County Planning: noconow.co/weldplanning •Martin Marietta: mmHighway34.com •CLR-34 Neighborhoods Association: www.clr-34.org f 31 1 6 in 03 IP/L4 [A CONNECT TWEET LINKEDIN COMMENT EMAIL MORE http://www.coloradoan.com/story/news/2015/06/09/martin-marietta-asphalt-plant-draws-fire/2872519546/9/2015 11 :32:44 AM] Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 7:35 AM To: phillipss95@yahoo.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Steve Phillips 5250 Georgetown Dr Loveland Co 6/ 12 /2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR1 S- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Steve Phillips EXHIBIT 1 ( 70 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 1 :51 PM To: MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MM Highway 34 Support Form Shane Behanish 4335 Bryant St Denver Co 80211 June 19, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17`h Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Shane Behanish EXHIBIT 1 17 ( Diana Aungst From: Erin Kunkel [erin.s. kunkei@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 2:07 PM To: Diana Aungst Subject: Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project Dear Weld County Commissioners : I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta 's Highway 34 Project ( USR15-0027) . I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over this project. I , however, am one who will benefit from this project through our region 's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. This in turn will increase jobs and pay within the area, which my generation is struggling to find right now . Our region will benefit from this project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials . This reasonable cost will become apparent when it is time to pave roads or construct concrete sidewalks and foundations . Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances . I urge you to approve Martin Marietta 's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, Erin Kunkel EXHIBIT La 1 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 2:07 PM To: MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MM Highway 34 Support Form Keri Cook 8960 Poze Blvd Thornton, CO 80229 06/12/2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Keri Cook EXHIBIT 1 Nicole Berko 221 Estes Park Est. Dr. Lyons, CO 8O540 June 12, 2O15 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-OO27) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 8O631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0O27). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over this project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. This in turn will increase jobs and pay in the area, which my generation is struggling to find right now. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, Nicole Berl EXHIBIT .w D A 3 From: Frank Piacentino 6811 Apache Rd. Johnstown Co.80534 Ref Case # USR15-0027 For Public Record June 15, 2015 To: Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services Dear Diana and Weld County Commissioners, I'm writing this letter to express my concerns of the negative impacts and incompatibility issues the proposed Martin Marietta Asphalt and Concrete USR15-027 at 27292 CR 13 . After 6 months of meetings, open houses .newspaper articles, and documents submitted, it is really clear Martin Marietta interpretation of compatibility is much different than any resident that will live in the surrounding area and anyone who will travel Highway 34, CR 13, CR15, CR17 and CR54. Martin Marietta only sees what is best for their Corporation Bottom Line Profits not the negative impacts and problems this proposal creates for the surrounding area residences. The burden is on the Applicant of the USR to show compatibility with the surrounding neighborhood, I do not feel Martin Marietta has shown, in any way that this proposal will not change the life style of the established community. At this time I am asking the Weld County Planning Department to recommend "Denial of this USR15-0027, and the Weld County Commissioners not to approve USR15-0027. A few points I would like to make before starting with the concerns of negative impacts and incompatible issues. Webster definition of compatibility: Compatible (adjective) — that can work well together, get along well, combine well 3) that can be mixed without reacting (e.g. chemically) or interfering with one another's action or situation. The Weld County's Department of Planning Services Mission Statement: "To ensure that land use and land development are consistent with adopted codes so that quality of life and property values are maintained for County residents, businesses and property owners through response to citizen concern" EXHIBIT • Traffic : Martin Marietta is proposing 1268 trips per day,634 round trips , that's 79 VEHICLES PER HOUR IN 8 HOURS OR 52 IN 12 HOURS, to start and 2013 trips in next 3 years, of heavy industrial type vehicles and 2-3 trains per week, with 95% of traffic going to stop light at Highway 34 and CR 13 . Looking into the future, there are 3 more heavy industrial proposed for the mile and a quarter of CR 13 south of Highway 34. Environtech's rezone COZ15-0001 from Ag to I-2 Industrial uses. Although the application is very vague and noncommittal, everyone knows what type of business Environtech does. The uses allowed in a I-2 are trans loading and Oil and gas facilities, which could bring another 80- 100 heavy industrial trips a day and could be approved with no issues if USR15-0027 is approved . Gerrard Investments is proposing to move his existing shop to the south, PRE15-0114, which adds 30 more trips. Another proposed USR ,PRE15-0109 ,W3 Legacy will add another 20-30 trips a day , totaling 1300 + trips per day 650 round trips , or 116 trips per hour in a 12 hour day, added to CR 13 and Highway 34. A stop light is going in at Highway 34 will do little for the congestion that will take place with a heavy industrial Type Truck Traffic every minute, this much traffic added to area roads will change anyone's life style. I feel the traffic will be so tied up at CR 13 and Highway 34, which trucks will travel to the south and really tie up CR 54, going east and west. Martin Marietta has not answered the question, "How will they handle the train crossings at CR 15,Cr 17,and CR 54" ,100+ car train as many as 5 more per week, moving 10-15 miles per hour will certainly hold up a lot of traffic ,no answers to date. • Noise and Visual : Martin Marietta has proposed a 20 foot berm around the south and east sides of the project. This berm will do little good, specifically to the residence of Indian Head Estates. I live on Apache Rd, the second street in from the west of the project, approximate 800 `from the east side of the proposed rail spur and 2700' from the west side .After looking area topo map, the center of their lot ranges from 4910'- 4915 ' above sea level, my home's floor is at 4945' , mind ya all approximate but very close to accurate, my eye level on my front porch would be at or about 4950' above sea level. Considering all the factor, train spur leveling, 14 'tall train boxes, a truck bridge over the tracks, has to be at least a minimum of 20'tall bridge ,then a 10-12 `truck, 100'asphalt plant tower,45 ' concrete batch plant tower ,30' plies of materials .THERE IS NO WAY THAT THE 20' SCREENING BERM WILL IN ANY WAY BLOCK THE VISUAL OR SOUND FROM MY HOME.'I'HE SCREENING THAT MARTIN MARIETTAI'S SO PROUD OF IS TOTALLY USELESS,IT WOULD BE LIKE TRYING TO HIDE A RAGING BULL ELEPHANT ON A KIDS PLAYGROUND . The remainder of the subdivision rises to about 4975 ', so other residences that have views to the west will also see everything that goes on at the plant. I have spent an hour each day for the last 2 weeks setting in front of the Martin Marietta plant on 35th Av. in Greeley, a same version of the proposed plant only smaller and without rail spur, tremendous traffic and noise. I have been taking decimal readings at the Greeley Plant for the last 2 weeks at different hours of the day, the reading range from 58-72 from about 1200' to plant ,not bad and maybe in compliance with the Weld County Code. The problem is there is a constant humming sound, with air pressure release about every minute, with back up machinery signal going off about every couple of minute, completely unacceptable, these sounds will definitely chance how we live in lndianhead Estates .I bought my lot in this subdivision 10 years ago, because it was one of the quietest placing we could find and still is a very quiet neighborhood. Living with that kind of heavy industrial noise all the time, will be a definite life style change that should not be allowed by anyone .Planning Staff should visit the site on 35`h Av.to get a feel for the industrial sounds that just do not belong in an estate neighborhood. I am sure no one would appreciate that kind of noise in their backyard, especially into an established quite subdivision that has been there for 45 years. Weld County Noise Ordinance Sec. 14-9- 10. Intent and applicability: A. It is hereby declared to be the intent of the Board of County Commissioners to protect the citizens of the County from excessive, unreasonable and unnecessary noise. • Community Economic Benefits This was taken from the USR Application: Many economic factors affect real estate values, but based on our experiences, we do not expect the project will harm nearby property values. Property values are closely tied to the economic climate of a community and Weld County has one of the strongest economies in the state of Colorado. One outcome of a strong economy is increased building demand, which results in sustained or increased property values (as evidenced by the continued development of the Route 34 and 1-25 interchange). This statement is true in most places, but I have facts does not fit this situation. I bought my lot 10 years ago and built my home, investing almost a half million dollars in to the property, for investment to down size after retirement .The property has good potential to increase in value, because of growth Johnstown moving north, Loveland moving east, Windsor moving south and Greeley moving west, the property was bound to be developed and increase in value .being in the business connected to development great. I listed my property for sale in December, just before the application came in for this project. Since then I have had 4 very interested buyers, all of them have back out because of the proposed asphalt plant, none of the four thought it would be desirable to live near an asphalt/concrete plant of this size and smell, with proposed industrial uses Living next door to asphalt is not desirable place to be, hence it is only common sense that properties that are not desirable will lose values. The property along CR 13 and Highway 34 has great potential for light commercial and residential mix uses, but very undesirable heavy industrial. In the USR application Martin Marietta states the uses are consistent with the comp plans of the Town of Windsor, Greeley, and the Town of Johnstown, after reading the referrals from the Towns and City ,this is not true ,JUST ANOTHER FABRICATION OF THE UNREALISTICT COMPAIABILTY THAT MATIN MARIETTA IS TRYING TO MAKE ALL OF US BELIEVE . • Site Selection: Martin Marietta considered 13 different sites, site # 2 is the site along CR 13, the rating scale gave this area a o, for the lest compatible, but scored 13 for the best to create a covenant location for their business, or to maximize Martin Marietta profits at the expense of 2-300 residence of Weld County and anyone that will travel on Highway 34 and the surrounding roads. Lockheed Martin is a 93 Billion Dollar Corporation. They can take this plant to several other locations and still make profits. One site would be Eastman Kodak, which is already zoned industrial and has a UP rail. Second site would be the Town of Milliken they also have an industrial park with rail line, the same line as # 2 site .The third site is to reconstruct their site on 35th Av. in Greely. The rail spur will not be as large, but they already exist in this location. Again the Gerrard site is covenant for the bottom line, but such a disaster for all the people that resided in that location for long time and should not have to endure such reduction in life style for their corporate profits. There are a lot of other issues that can be raised with this propose USR, and I may write a second letter. I am asking the Weld County Planning Department to recommend "Denial the USR15-0027, and the Weld County Commissioners not to approve USR15-0027. The Weld County's Department of Planning Services Mission Statement: "To ensure that land use and land development are consistent with adopted codes so that quality of life and property values are maintained for County residents, businesses and property owners through response to citizen concern" Hoping that Planning Staff and Weld County Commissioners look all of these negatives that this proposed USR will impose on the residence and make the right decision. Sincere! Frank and Chris Piacentino 6811 Apache Rd Johnstown Co. Diana Aungst From: MM Highway 34 Support [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.comj Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 3:35 PM To: MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Tim 26956 WCR 47 Greeley Co 80631 06- 12-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 EXHIBIT No Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). As a contractor who has 75 employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Tim 2 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 3:38 PM To: MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Anna Kester 309 Central Ave Severance, CO 80546 6- 12-15 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Anna Kester EXHIBIT 1 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 3:45 PM To: mloomis40@gmail.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Michael Loomis 309 Central Ave Severance CO 80546 June 12, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Michael Loomis EXHIBIT 1 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 3:50 PM To: marc.smith@mhc.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Marc Smith 112 13th street Greeley,co 80631 06122015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Marc Smith EXHIBIT I 17g, Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 4:04 PM To: nrutter@powermotivecorp.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Nate Rutter 5000 vasquez blvd Denver, 80216 6/12/2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 EXHIBIT I ( I) Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). As a contractor who has 200 employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! 1 Sincerely, Nate Rutter 2 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34. info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 4: 10 PM To: brett.morris@mhc.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Brett Morris 112 13th Street Greeley, CO 80631 6/12/2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 EXHIBIT ' -'IL-- Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). As a contractor who has 50 employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! 1 Sincerely, Brett Morris 2 Diana Aungst From: MM Highway 34 Support [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 4:37 PM To: MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Daniel Ross 10200 West 26th Ave Lakewood, Co 80215 June 12th 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 EXHIBIT Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). As a contractor who has 35 employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! 1 Sincerely, Daniel Ross 2 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 4:55 PM To: smolakm@hotmail.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Monica Smolak 2190 N Bryant St #213 Denver CO 80211 06/12/2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 EXHIBIT 1 as Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). As a contractor who has 200 employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! 1 Sincerely, Monica Smolak 2 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 5: 14 PM To: jarebuh@yahoo.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Jerry Huber 160 Crestview Lane Bailey. Co. 80421 June, 12, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USRI 5-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Jerry Huber EXHIBIT I D t 1 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 5: 16 PM To: MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Jason Dack 9535 Eastman Park Drive Windsor Co. 80550 05- 12-2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Jason Dack EXHIBIT 1 5 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.comj Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 5:34 PM To: MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Joe Yearous 3306 Laguna St. Greeley, CO 80634 6/12/2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). 1 understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Joe Yearous EXHIBIT 3 ilia_ Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent Friday, June 12, 2015 7: 15 PM To: crazyfocks@yahoo.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Kami Fockler 1481 Waterwood Drive Windsor, Co 80550 06/12/2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Kami Fockler EXHIBIT 1 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2015 6:52 AM To: MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Patrick Kelleher 1015 Champion Dr Windsor CO 80550 6//13/2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17t'' Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Patrick Kelleher EXHIBIT fitt Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.comj Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2015 1 :14 PM To: jrw2004@live.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Josh Wright 13614 Saddle Dr Meade CO 80542 June 13, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Josh Wright EXHIBIT 1 I 2—n-- Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2015 1 : 17 PM To: MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Danielle Culjat 13614 Saddle Dr Meade CO 80542 June 13, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Danielle Culjat EXHIBIT 1 1 I 90 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2015 5:50 PM To: rasekw@rushenterprises.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form William Rasek 3335 34th Street Greeley, CO 80634 06/13/2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, William Rasek EXHIBIT Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2015 8:23 PM To: nicofesngr@yahoo.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Nicole Singer 8891 W Frost Ave Littleton, CO 80128 6/13/15 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Nicole Singer EXHIBIT 19a._ Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2015 8:27 PM To: vaideze76@yahoo.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Elizabeth Valdez 8891 W Frost Ave Littleton, CO 80128 6/13/15 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Elizabeth Valdez EXHIBIT 1 I a Diana Aungst From: MM Highway 34 Support [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2015 8:28 PM To: MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Brad Kohlman 8891 W Frost Ave Littleton, CO 80128 8/13/15 Weld County Commissioners do Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 EXHIBIT 19q Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta' s Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). As a contractor who has 280 employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region' s ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! i Sincerely, Brad Kohlman 2 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.comj Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2015 9:59 AM To: MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Henrietta Archuleta 510 Cable St lochbuie 6/14/ 15 Weld County Commissioners do Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Henrietta Archuleta EXHIBIT 1 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 3:30 PM To: MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MM Highway 34 Support Form Keith Couch 3535 Capitol Peak Dr. Loveland, CO 80538 06/12/2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Keith Couch EXHIBIT DJak_1 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 4:33 PM To: MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MM Highway 34 Support Form Joshua Jensen 9550 Cove Creek Dr. Highlands Ranch, CO 80129 06/12/2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Joshua Jensen EXHIBIT I iii_ Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2015 1 :22 PM To: MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MM Highway 34 Support Form Josh WILSON 2782 W 106th Cir Westminster CO June 19, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Josh WILSON EXHIBIT t, i 9 )1 i Diana Aungst From: DONNA S [gardengirldonna@msn.com] Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2015 4:50 AM To: Diana Aungst Subject: Martin Marietta Hwy 34 Project I would like to show my support for the Martin Marietta aggregate/asphalt/concreteplant. I think it will help with the local economics for building and keeping up our roads. As a Weld County resident, I like that this is another huge source of tax money and hope that we don't miss out on it if another county pursues this project. Donna Schmidt 11816 N Beasly Rd Longmont, CO 80504 EXHIBIT is 1 j______n___ Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2015 5:47 PM To: MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MM Highway 34 Support Form Kelsey Gill 2031 Sonora Street Fort Collins 6/14/2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Kelsey Gill EXHIBIT 1 I Uoo Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2015 5:50 PM To: temery8383@gmaii.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Todd Emery 2031 Sonora Street Fort Collins 6/14/2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Todd Emery EXHIBIT 1 27687 Hopi Trail Johnstown, CO 80524 28 May 2015 Weld County Commissioners and Weld County Planning Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Planners and Commissioners: t would like to take issue with Martin Marietta Materials' (MMM) application for Use by Special Review, Case U USR15-0027. On Page 5 of the application, MMM is ask to address the issue of the consistency of their application with Policy 7.1, of Chapter 22 of the Weld County Code. This policy reads: County land use regulations should support commercial and industrial uses that are directly related to, or dependent upon, agriculture, to locate within the agricultural areas, when the impact to surrounding properties is minimal, or can be mitigated, and where adequate services are currently available or reasonably obtainable. MMM responded, in part, with the following statement: In addition, the land being removed from agriculture has been kept in pasture grass and is not a significant generator of food product for people or animals. Therefore, the agricultural land being removed from production would not be considered prime agricultural production land. The property is in an area that is planned for future development and the property owner is pursuing the option of developing their property in order to achieve the highest and best use of their property considering its location in relation to the Union Pacific railroad tracks, WCR 13, and Highway 34. On the weekend of May 30, 2015, the undersigned witnessed a crop being harvested from this "pasture grass" that a local farmer tells me is a type of alfalfa. On June 15, 2015, at approximately 3: 30 pm, the undersigned witnessed a helicopter applying a spray to a second crop of this "pasture grass." As aerial application by helicopter is expensive, no doubt the farmer who requested it expected a financial return. EXHIBIT Clearly the above statement in MMM's application was untrue. I ask that the planners and commissioners keep this fact in mind as they consider the remainder of MMM's application. The affected property is, in fact, excellent farmland. A local farmer, Mr. Lar Voss, tells me that he has planted this land in wheat, corn, barley, and alfalfa for the past 25 years. My wife and have lived in adjoining property for the past 8 years, and have personally watched Mr. Voss cultivate it. While the water rights have been sold, another local farmer tells me that the land is still suitable for wheat, sorghum, and a variety of alfalfa. Let me raise another issue related to Policy 7.1: County land use regulations should support commercial and industrial uses that are directly related to, or dependent upon, agriculture. i a meeting between homeowners and MMM representatives on June 3, 2015, we were advised that 76% of all truck traffic leaving the proposed site would be westbound. Since the proposed site is located on the border between Weld and Larimer Counties, this suggests that % of the aggregate received at the facility would leave Weld County, to be used elsewhere. Is it in Weld County's interest to suffer the emotional, traffic, environmental, and other injuries associated with this proposed facility, in order to primarily serve other counties' needs? Respectfully yours, 7) 1 Gary Oplinger Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2015 10:06 PM To: MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MM Highway 34 Support Form Michael Martinez 10113 W 68th Way Arvada CO 80004 6/14/15 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Michael Martinez EXHIBIT 1 I an_ Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2015 10:04 PM To: MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MM Highway 34 Support Form Micaela Martinez 10113 W 68th Way Arvada CO 80004 6/14/15 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Micaela Martinez EXHIBIT 1 Diana Aungst From: MM Highway 34 Support [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 1 : 11 PM To: MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Rob Warne 5460 Montana Vista Way Castle Rock, CO 80108 6 15 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 EXHIBIT i 3, cLia Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). As a contractor who has 200 employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! 1 Sincerely, Rob Warne 2 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 12:22 PM To: JohnAnest@divideconstructors.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form John Anest 1563 E. 131st PL Thornton, CO 80241 6/15/2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, John Anest EXHIBIT Brian R. Laartz 700 Weaver Park Road Longmont, CO 80501 June 15, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners : I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project ( USR15-0027). As a contractor who has roughly 100 employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, ti _, iihr i(m ._ EXHIB T 1 C201 Brian R. Laartz, GTC President June 15, 2015 From: John Cummings 26700 Weld County Road # 13 Johnstown, CO 80534 To: Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner 11 Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 North 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Case #USR 15-0027 FOR PUBLIC RECORD Dear Commissioners: I am in COMPLETE OPPOSITION to the proposed Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development plan. The Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development is an irresponsible and non-compatible development for our community. The enormity of this industrial project will impact our quality of life due to traffic, noise, odor, safety, and pollutants and contaminates. WHAT WE CANNOT SEE WILL HURT US. WHY SHOULD WE HAVE THESE EMISSIONS ADDED TO OUR NEIGHTBORHOOD? This facility will have multiple sources of emissions of which only three sources were evaluated: asphalt plant, concrete plant and asphalt recycling. Concrete recycling, aggregate unloading, aggregate transport, aggregate crushing, truck and train diesel emissions, and other assorted emissions from equipment were not considered as part of the "model" or the applicants application. Emissions such as, benzene, formaldehyde, ethylbenzene, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, hexane, toluene, xylene, silica and particle matter 2.5-10 all can have harmful effects on human health. Although MMM claims, which is based on absent data from the model, that none of these substances will be emitted from the plant in quantities sufficient to adversely influence either the health of the workers or of those who live in the surrounding communities. Its claim seems to be based solely on the fact that there are state and federal agencies that handle these things, so we don't have to be concerned. Given the track record of those agencies such as recent blunders by the Environmental Protection Agency, Center for Disease Control and the U.S Army Bio-Chemical Research Center, I doubt whether there are many people in the county who believe that they are effectively safeguarding our health. What we do not know for sure is the effects of long-term exposure to these chemicals and whether they will accumulate in individuals living near this facility. According to the US EPA roughly one out of every three people in the United States is at a higher risk of experiencing PM2_5 related health effects. One group at high risk is active children because they often spend a lot of time playing outdoors and their bodies are still developing and EXHIBIT 1Ot the elderly population. People of all ages who are active outdoors are at increased risk because PM2.5 penetrates deeper into the parts of the lungs and blood streams unfiltered, causing permanent DNA mutations, heart attacks and premature death. Apart from the number of different chemical emission coming from the site, the plant proposes to emit 56,000 pounds of fugitive dust from this site a year base solely on three emissions sources. The dust represents all sizes from PM2.5 to PM 10. If the other sources are taken into consideration the amount will be significantly higher. Again these small particle sizes are very harmful to human health with younger and older people being more susceptible. The environment around the proposed site commonly has daily-sustained winds ranging from 5 to 36 mph with gust up to 61 mph record during last 12 months. Mitigation of fugitive dust from the site will be next to impossible. It all will start with the arrival of the 117-car train with uncovered aggregate cars, unloading train cars, conveyor belts taking the aggregate to piles and moving aggregate from piles to washing or crushing facility. There is no way that MMM can prevent the fugitive dust from escaping their facility. MMM have stated in two open house meetings "we are not allow to have dust leave our site". That is why an operation of this magnitude should not be allowed to locate near residential areas. I feel that MMM has failed to adequately consider: 1 ) the bioaccumulative effects of the toxic emissions involved together with other pollutants that county residents are routinely exposed to; 2) the magnified effects on infants, children, the elderly, and people with special sensitivities to site emissions; 3) the consequences of complete or partial mechanical or electrical failure of the emissions filtering equipment; 4) the possibility of equipment failure due to employee error, to the impaired functioning of employees due to alcohol or drugs, or due to attack on the facility by a mentally deranged person or persons, and 5) the fact that MMM will be self-monitors should not be allowed. The current application should address these issues with factual information from repeated replicated studies from independent sources. As related to emissions, the Weld County Commissioners should apply the "Precautionary Principle" for the wellbeing and safety of their residents. Thank you, John Cummings Diana Aungst From: Cyndie Aab [25puffins@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 2: 11 PM To: Diana Aungst Subject: Case # USR 15-0027 Case # USR 15-0027 For Public Record June 15, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 970-353-6100 ext 3524; Fax: 970-304-6498 daungst@weldgov.com Dear Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County in the subdivision of Indianhead Estates I would like to encourage the County Planners to DENY the permit presented by Martin Marietta for an asphalt and concrete batch plant, gravel transfer facility including heavy truck and train traffic, to be located on Weld County Rd 13 between Weld County Rd 56 and US Hwy 34. I have lived in the area for 14 years, we have seen a tremendous increase in traffic on Hwy 34 between Loveland and Greeley, even train traffic has increased. The proposal by MMM presents many issues for our area . The site would create a significant amount of noise, dust and odors including toxic chemicals. Our subdivision is on a bit of a hill, the land rises from the proposed site to WCR 15 enough for us to be well above any dirt piles they want to use for noise abatement and to block the view of their facility from the surrounding neighbors. The proposal includes a truck overpass to cross the rail lines within the facility. This is said to be at least 20 feet above the grade and then add the large trucks on top, you can't block this with dirt piles or walls. If the trucks are dumping into the rail cars from this overpass, then the dust will be constant. If this overpass is just to get over the tracks, they shouldn't need to go up, if we can't go up over their tracks, why should they be able to? There are proposals for warnings in the neighborhood if the air is unsafe and we would be forced to stay in our homes. NO — we are not going to be held hostage in our own homes because Martin Marietta Materials wants to invade our agricultural area with Heavy Industrial development. Trains loading and unloading create a lot of noise. We don't have noise now. Heavy truck traffic to the tune of 1100 trips per day! There isn't enough roadway for that many trucks in the area just by themselves, but we already have very heavy vehicle traffic and congestion on US Hwy 34. There would be no way to accommodate that much big truck traffic in the area . I don't think that all of the vehicles on Hwy 34 want to sit at traffic lights allowing hundreds of truck to enter from WCR 13. This proposed site would be directly adjacent to homes in the subdivision and to farm homes on the other sides. It truly is not compatible with the area and by re-zoning to industrial the entire surrounding residential properties will lose significant value as we won't be able to enjoy our neighborhood as we have with a quiet and clean outdoor area. We won't be able to sell our homes because people don't want to live in a heavy industrial area . EXHIBIT D A Please, I urge the County Commissioners and County Planners to deny this application for an asphalt and concrete batch plant, gravel transfer facility including heavy truck and train traffic, to be located on Weld County Rd 13 between Weld County Rd 56 and US Hwy 34. Thank you for your careful consideration in this matter. Regards, Cynthia Aab lndianhead Estates Resident 2 Diana Aungst From: MM Highway 34 Support [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 10:37 AM To: MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Jon Nelson 275 E. 64th Ave Denver, CO 80221 6/15/2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 EXHIBIT aio Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). As a contractor who has 100 employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! 1 Sincerely, Jon Nelson 2 Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.comi Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 10: 16 AM To: MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MM Highway 34 Support Form Erika Croonenberghs 2737 W 28th Ave Denver 6/15/2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Erika Croonenberghs EXHIBIT Ai ( Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 8:38 AM To: MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MM Highway 34 Support Form Curtis Heller 5125 E. 138th Ave. Thornton 6/15/15 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17thAvenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Curtis Heller EXHIBIT . 1 i aN I Diana Aungst From: MM Highway 34 Support [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 7:47 AM To: MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Ron Pound 5975 Sparrow Ave Firestone, CO 80504 06/15/2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 EXHIBIT I -an_ Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta' s Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). As a contractor who has 150 employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! 1 Sincerely, Ron Pound 2 Diana Aungst From: MM Highway 34 Support [MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 2:31 PM To: MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Brett Goodell 601 E. Collins Street Eaton 6/15/2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 EXHIBIT I a Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). As a contractor who has 12 employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! 1 Sincerely, Brett Goodell 2 Diana Aungst Subject: FW: Heavy industry Protest From: Walter Fenton <scott fenton55@msn.com> Date: June 15, 2015 at 2:00:32 PM MDT To: Tom Parko Jr. <tparko@co.weld.co.us> Subject: RE: Heavy Industry Protest Hello, Tom, This is Walter Scott Fenton owner of 6720 Apache Rd. in Indianhead Estates, I just read Tetra Tech letter and again I must state that I believe it is imperative to deny the USR- 15- 0027 permit to Martin Marietta and Tetra Tech and any other corporation that thinks these projects are appropriate for this site ! It may well be that this site may serve their purposes for use of the railroad infrastructure, but the are many other places that have railroads in place and will not disrupt our present lives , that we have established here in Weld County ! I personally have been paying off my property for many years, looking forward to living here, in our beautiful Indianhead Estates , Rural setting, overlooking the Long's Peak and the Front Range. Scott Scott Fenton cell - 303-594-9832 home - 970-203-9275 email - Scott_Fenton@msn.com www.fentonsfineart.com EXHIBIT I lisat. Diana Aungst From: MMHighway34.com Support Form [MMHighway34.Info@martinmarietta.com] Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 3:01 PM To: MMHighway34. Info@martinmarietta.com Subject: MMHighway34.com Support Form Janet S Wiley 3542 County Road 29 Fort Lupton 06/15/2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Janet S Wiley EXHIBIT 1 1 alto Case # USR 150027 For Public Record Date: 6/15/2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner ll Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 970-353-6100 ext 3524; Fax: 970-304-6498 daungst@weldgov.com Weld County Commissioners: RE: Planning Application USR 150027: Martin Marietta Materials Highway 34 Development I am writing again to urge you to deny the Martin Marietta Materials (MMM) USR permit request. I attended their recent meeting for neighbors and read their response to the negative referrals from Windsor and Greeley. I am deeply concerned by MMM's continued claims that their plans are compatible with the plans of local municipalities and that the relatively small changes they have made in their plans will address their devastating impact on nearby residents. Although MMM continues to assert that they will be "a good neighbor", they have so far been nonresponsive to requests that they submit to monitoring and shut down operations if they cannot meet the noise and odor limits that they claim they will meet. Without a willingness to take responsibility for the promises they make by accepting requirements as part of their USR permit, their assurances are meaningless, and it is clear that the assurances are intended only to appease protesters. Thus, none of us can have any confidence that MMM really intends to be a good neighbor once it has a permit in hand. The MMM code of ethical business conduct (http://cdn . martinmarietta . com/media/1402/ethicsbooklet.pdf) emphasizes that it is committed to providing a safe and healthy workplace for employees and visitors, but it does not include a commitment to preserving a safe and healthy environment for neighbors. It only commits to "operating in an environmentally responsible manner." It is telling that the only people singled out for protection are employees and visitors. While protecting them may go part way in protecting residents, employees don't live on site and aren't exposed to the adverse conditions (noise, traffic, odor, pollution) 24 hours a day, 7 days a week like residents are. Why doesn't MMM's code of ethics commit to providing a safe and healthy environment for all neighbors? It appears that the company, from the top on down, does not care about neighbors. And because MMM does not care, we must rely on our elected officials to protect us. I urge you to protect residents in the nearby areas by denying MMM's USR permit request. The letter from Tetra Tech in response to the Windsor and Greeley referrals emphasizes the economic benefits of locating the facility in the proposed location and the desirability of providing materials at a "lower environmental and financial cost than would be possible if the use were to be proposed in a remote area of the county." What really is the difference in cost? Why should the residents near the Highway 34 site subsidize all of this economic development by absorbing a disproportionate share of the noneconomic costs? Alternate locations, such as the old Kodak site, have key features required by MMM and do not require the same sacrifice by county residents. The alternate locations are not that remote or even that far from the proposed location. Any company that genuinely respects its neighbors would consider both economic and noneconomic costs in assessing trade-offs in location. While MMM does not have to care about people, take a balanced perspective in making business decisions, or consider the community and region as a whole, I urge you to do so. Please consider, for example, the traffic burden that the proposed MMM facility will create and the environmental and human cost of congestion and EXHIBIT higher safety risks that all the trucks going into and out of the plant will create for the many people who commute along this route daily. Please consider the dampening effect that placing a large asphalt and concrete plant in that location will have on future residential and commercial development, and the loss of future jobs and taxpayers from the area. Please consider the health of vulnerable people living in nearby neighborhoods and health care facilities, and the risks that pollution pose for them, even if the pollution meets standards and is not known to be hazardous for the average healthy person. Please consider directing heavy industry of this type to areas in the county that provide a better balance of ALL the factors that are important to county residents. PLEASE deny the MMM request for a USR permit. Thank you, Ellen Kisker eekisker@gmail.com June io, 2015 JUN 15 2015 Weld County k'laniii�i° .a';; 1i ► u►: ► Weld County Commissioners GREELEY OFFICE c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley CO 80631 ATTENTION: Weld County Commissioners As a business owner in Weld County, I am very active in my community and issues in Northeast Colorado. I absolutely support Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and encourage the elected Weld County Commissioners to unanimously approve this project. Our county must spend its funds cost-effectively and obtain the best quality services for money expended. Our county must plan for the future and consider the long-term advantages versus the short-term troubles. Endorsing the Martin Marietta's plant within Weld County will accomplish this and provides residents and travelers multiple benefits. To those who would disagree with this statement, I say: "Do your research and check your facts!" This approved project will improve the quality of our roads, increase the economy and draw other tax-paying business to our region. Regards, 7)0 4icyS 0 r N n Storage, LLC 14609 Weld County Road loo Nunn, CO 80648 EXHIBIT ` witr ! iF JUN 15 2015 c/o Diana Aungst (USR1S-0027) Weld County Planning vvew County ruJ,ndue; 1555 N . 17th Avenue GREELEY OFFICE Greeley, CO 80631 Dear : I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). As a contractor who has 3 employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sin / cli \K p s -. 9cc 1 EXHIBIT R Fr F Pk- JUN 15 2015 Weld County PlannRi Weld County Commissioners GREELEY OFF CI"""` c/o Diana Aungst USR15-0027 Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley CO 80631 Commissioners and Planning Staff, I'm sending this letter in support of the Martin Marietta Highway 34 Operations. I feel the growth of Greeley and Weld County needs this positive project for the future of this area. Martin Marietta has proven to be a dedicated company in meeting the needs of the rapid growth of Northern Colorado in the oast years. They have Provided the materials and labor needed for the oil field industry and the population growth we've experienced here, and the need for this what this company wiii provide is going to continue to be felt in the coming years. Due to the depletion of raw materials at ifs current plant, Martin Marietta has chose to built in this area, which will continue to make raw material costs reasonable and available. Martin Marietta is working hard to make the oroiect enivorimental safe and community friendly. They will be investing their time and money into making this project as positive and productive as possible. Also, they will be hiring people in our community at a good wage, and with good benefits that will be a added benefit to this area. They work with their employees to provide a good working environment making for positive attitudes and demeanor and ethics. The company is willing to work with the governing agencies to make this project the best it can be for both parties. The need for this type of project will continue to be a concern. Martin Marietta is a nationwide company and will continue to grow and meet supplier demand. I feel Greeley, Weld County and Northern Colorado can only benefit from having this type of company staying within this area. The economic growth in this part of Colorado can only benefit having a company with positive ethics and community support. I feel if this project is denied, the growth and need for raw materials will be a concern for this area in a few years, and we then may have to settle for a leaser company, hiring at minium wage and not having the resources to make the plant as community complatable, as the need will outweigh the outcome. Please consider approving Landuse Project USR15-0027 for our future needs of Weld County. Thank you, EXHIBIT in �' r° P � � JUN 15 2015 Greg Engelbrecht Ydeltl Cour;ty rtarrnr� b ��Nai ""�"� 5050 Silverwood Dr. GREELEY OFFICE Johnstown Co. 80534 June 9, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Greg Engelbrecht EXHIBIT June 9, 2015 49180 Weld County Road 29 %2 Nunn CO 80648 in, prorwm Weld Country Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-00027) JUN 15 2015 Weld County Planning 1555 17`" Avenue Weld County FHarnriir,e LLipatUTlertt GREELEY OFFICE Greeley CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a Weld County resident and one who uses the roads surrounding the proposed location of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project, I strongly encourage the Weld County Commissioners to approve this project. As with any project, there are those that argue against progress; this is based on not being fully aware of the many benefits and only focuses on the minimal adverse impacts. Before retirement and moving to Nunn, I owned an automotive repair shop and know the affects under maintained roads cause to autos. As elected officials, I am sure you want happy Weld County voters and not those disgruntled auto owners who can't understand why the county can't maintain roadways. Weld County will reap many benefits from USR15-0027. A few of these are: • purchasing materials locally and avoiding the higher costs when required to go outside of service area; • keeping funds local by not importing materials; • transporting some resources by train instead of trucks; and • Martin Marietta has a strong history of working with local, city, county and state governments. I highly recommend the Weld County Commissioners approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project. Regards, Mich/- I J Johnson EXHIBIT I re prr r c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) JUN 15 2015 Weld County Planning Held County 1555 N. 17th Avenue GREELEY' OFFICE Greeley, CO 80631 As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials . Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances . I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, Ao.. / v 6.) \ • . 3Th sc)._ \,) se\- 40( (r_, T cy Co . ?) 0 corl< 1 EXHIBIT N fJ 7 j CEJV !, , JUN 15 2015 David Engelbrecht Weld County 12��,�;,,� , �eµdtir��erlt 5050 Silverwood Dr. GREELEY OFFICE Johnstown Co. 80534 June 9, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027) . I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project, 1, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project, Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, David Engelbrecht EXHIBIT REC, Fiv r Cory DeGroot JUN 15 2015 7720 3rd St. Meld County Plann►,►li .pati►►►cit( Wellington, CO 80549 GREELE.Y OF ICE June 11, 2015 Weld County Board of Commissioners PO Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 Dear Weld County Board of Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project . I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project. Sincerely, Cory DeGroot EXHIBIT 3 RECFJIJED JUN 15 2015 Tim Haag 509 Crescent Dr. Weld County Planning uepattment Loveland, CO 80538 GREELEY OFFICE June 9, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners : I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). i understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, j Tim Haag EXHIBIT Ike -c-to k\ow Cc --e O r;s CF re oak Ljek c (`-{- .es C deir\k-5 rc4 . � @onThi- c4 a vs . [Your Name] 1 [Street Address] c' / [City, ST ZIP Code] ECEi �[DateN o &3% - a JUN 1 5 2015 Weld Weld County Commissioners . GRECountY planning Depart c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) ELEY pFFlCE meat Weld County Planning C9\1(a 1555 N. 17th Avenue - Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, [Your Name] RECEIVED [Your Name] s h e:U E- n9 e 1 bre t t JUN 15 2015 [Street Address] e i .SC�SI� `� �-y �' �� 1,��.. Weld County Flannrn ST ZIP Code oh cis LQ"lu c- 3 GRE Di 7F Aartmer7t [City, ] .l • d► _� . g ` e [Date] 5- CE Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, [Your Name] REcnvrn [Your NameJ7" a J-CV UN 15 20)5 [Street Address7-1149r� c Weld County (City, ST ZIP Code] CJ GREELEY O CE "� co, < 1 U[Date] ce3y Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners . As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project ( USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very dose to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, [Your Name] EXHIBIT /eeIL A [Your Name] v f Street Address CI % , cat-cat-C ' RECF ; s , rm [City, ST ZIP Code] , c 1°.S C°:. [Date] S ? _ /s JUN 15 ,2015 Weld County Planning Weld County Commissioners GREELEY OF <<�r+�„� c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project ( USR1S-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, [Your Name] / 7SS csLa reit cet EXHIBIT RECEIVED VED JUN 15 2015 [Your Name] Q&JQj2OD ('L t� N /t't" t C� fi� ^ y6 Weld County Planning ueparirnent [Street Address] 5 1V 3 5 u A GREEDY OFFICE [City, ST ZIP Code] C punt-1 CO , O .x, "3 1 [Date] 5 /20c Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). l understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, [Your Name] EXHIBIT [Your Name] [Street Address] { C �;� C� 3O ct.2 Ortz_ti.,. 1 10Ev Cit ST ZI P Code] 253° 230 �[ v, [Date] r2 6 - 2O / � Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aun st USR15-0027 '"" ' / g ( � �U� vhssir Weld County Planning .� 5 2015 1555 N. 17th Avenue Weld GREY Plannrng �e1�ar Greeley, CO 80631 ELEY OFFfCE tment Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). As a contractor who has (number of employees- employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, EXHIBIT [Your Name] Cw 11[Your Name] art. o�y 1 [Street Address] /[City, ST ZIP Code] �� C!/ s �✓t [Date] CrGedr Co 84635 s /s RECEIVED Weld County Commissioners JUN 15 201 Weld Co 5 c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) County Han, Weld County Planning GREELEY ii°$p? ttnentepa 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). As a contractor who has number of employees employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, EXHIBIT [Your Name] .11 aaa [Your Name] c„ I [Street Address] ,5OSa ca l/Miss/OO4 Dr [City, ST ZIP Cod effoAgee6 rn 3Li 60R [Date] 5-2(445 tIED J Wel o �N Cp a 15 2015 Weld count ly cc/oDiana Aungst 0027) CREEL y`'m Depart FILE merit Weld County Planning 1555 N . 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project ( USR15-0027). As a contractor who has number of employees] employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, EXHIBIT [Your Name] [Your Name] Xi /lox rat [Street Address] fa3 / [City, ST ZIP Code] i Icy /v [Date] �'natibc [ RECEIvED VED JUN 15zoc Weld County Commissioners Veld 1 County piann . c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027) G Weld County Planning REE�`EY OFFICE rtment 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). As a contractor who has number of employees' employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, EXHIBIT [Your Name] t i [Your Name] Q r � qn /1< -e Is a -� [Street Address] lot C it a >.4 [City, ST ZIP Code] FA. fi 0. ^ co ea 6 (54 [Date] S, n 15 1ECEI1raWeld County Commissioners II D c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) JUN 1 weld 2015 Weld County Planning Vounty /:.i Sri 1555 N. 17th Avenue GRee�tY UFLiep F . oneGreeley, CO 80631 �Ge nt Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). As a contractor who has :number of employees- employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, EXHIBIT [Your Name] Aisne [Your Name] jOb 1/ell [Street Address] 14S fl 4 e t -e, Ei \ pr, If [City, ST ZIP Code] n ,-•\ 2p , IC) &O '5 duAl [Date] ?-- rsf5r JUN 15 2015 .Weld County RE plannin ELEY O$FCE1rment Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project ( USR15-0027). As a contractor who has :number of employees" employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, EXHIBIT [Your Name] soz‘ 1 [Your Name] / A Pksr F— \ rt Street Address Q 410H1 AU-C.- REC [City, ST ZIP Code] G rtsc ‘ y C� 30C0-344 JUNDate / 5 215 [Date] 5-#-05269 - -05 X769 — < Weld County Planning GREELEYo U F e OPT rtment Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst ( USR1S-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N . 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). As a contractor who has number of employees] employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, 1 ' EXHIBIT [Your Name] [Your Name] k wok( H Pus (4ttnico [Street Address] 4{p(x) N. �1 [City, ST ZIP Code] Pita lkAS a) 9.52.4 RECEIVED [Date] 5/ D4 is JUN 15 2015 Weld County Commissioners Weld County Planning GREELEy b e O rtment c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027) FFICE Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners : I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project ( USR1S-0027). As a contractor who has number of employees" employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region . The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, EXHIBIT [Your Name] IJ gVSkt,v.s.nact% �m�rl J [Your 0t1 b //2i�� Name] _ � � � �-� [Street Address] i'? C2 e, [City, ST ZIP Code] i'tece /.E, 5C2 3 / RECEIVED [Date] f5 JUN 15 2015 Weld County Commissioners Weld County Planninguepaiiment GREELEY OFFICE c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N . 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners : I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). As a contractor who has -number of employees- employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, EXHIBIT[Your Name] cciTC / _% [Your Name] Oft/ Pi a 1C"-- [Street Address] 410 / 6..(,4G; e t IL [City, ST ZIP Code] RECEIVED [Date] c--� 6 ''�a/ 5 Crviate_y � 3 JUN 15 2015 Weld County Commissioners Weld County �'lanniiio GREELEY OFF)CE utmerit c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N . 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project ( USR15-0027). As a contractor who has 'number of employees- employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, gvt%A\. \Z EXHIBIT [Your Name] [Your Name] g 1 Q [Street Address] nrcrE r [City, ST ZIP Code] 7� / f Q,Q7/1/ g [Date] Graz Ce b 3 JUN 15 2015 � y E . 20 - 134 weld County Planning Department Weld County Commissioners GREELEY OFFICE c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). As a contractor who has number of employees- employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, EXPOSIT [Your Name] Ada......0 I ,cVqt, 5 . 94-4\ ) thin [Your Name] rn ;r\a c .l [Street Address] ) (o at, L,1 �"'Z k value_value_ L4 - RECEIVED [City, ST ZIP Code] i, l �,c ) co 23 - 77 [Date] JUN 15 2015 51ae / is Weld County Planning Department Weld County Commissioners GREELEY OFFICE c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project ( USR15-0027). As a contractor who has -number of employees] employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region . The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ] Sincerely, EXHIBIT [Your Name] I a [Your Name] Tag 0�Iis H/42(-- ie [Street Address] c 62 / . 3 kd 44-ye RFC' EIV[City, STZIPCode] / [Date] JUN 15 2015 4/47.. Weld County Planning uepaitment Weld County Commissioners GREELEY OFFICE c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). As a contractor who has number of employees' employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, [Your Name] �, -�L3, EXHIBIT [Your Name ]"t V icy ,Mow-"" �e z [Street Address] 2,39 E '13 Ave [City, ST ZIP Code] G1ett it, go b.� "1 [Date] c / 2 6l I JUN 15 2015 1 Weld 1 Coun�y F �arrr�rrrED GREELEY a �eparuner1t OFFICE Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). As a contractor who has 'number of employees employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, EXHIBIT aziti[Your Na 2 S7R 1F7 I' c' ! f/a'W1 [Your Name] Oa ) 3 kO 5'7-PE/Tr [Street Address] [City, ST ZIP Code] C� [Date] ._ - : vED JUN 152015 Weld County Commissioners Weld County Plant RGRFEELE: g Departmentc/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027} OFFICE Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project ( USR15-0027). As a contractor who has number of employees- employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, Mit V EXHIBIT 41 145 [Your Name] "" h [Your Name] Rto , S \-/ t \t w fit,/ [Street Address] ( j i �, } n rr r. r \P [City, ST ZIP Code] [ l r , ■ej1 [Date] v S H (is JUN 15 2015 Weld County Commissioners weld County v'larmiuilg uepartment GREELEY OFFICE c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). As a contractor who has number of employees- employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, EXHIBIT [Your Name] • [Your Name] S yw, 4 [Street Address] t.4O sot Lc ) G ' I1 % [City, ST ZIP Codej ft ...et° \2s p 4 at g tit spa E D [Date] ounty JUN 152015 Weld County Commissioners Weld GREELEYtiOFl=lrepar[flient c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) E Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). As a contractor who has number of employees" employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincere y, EXHIBIT [Your Name] [Your Name] ccic/ .s rAs [Street Address] Offs y("i [City, ST ZIP Code] � , l fee/≤ t /C y [Date] "' - V 1.71 —zS2-LC JUN 15 2015 g Weld County Commissioners vvelu Coatay rid III;lit LiePd1 uneru c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027) GREELEY OFFICE Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project ( USR15-0027). As a contractor who has "number of employees- employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincere , EXHIBIT [Your Name] 1 ALI lit [Your Name] /7S1 ye-/v _., Fn RFCPV . [Street Address] 3 y%q 3 Va- 2015 [City, gd6 3 9 JUN 15 f y, ST ZIP Code] 6ree /eyro CoC [Date] ..5 - 6 /S Y1at►n►,►g vr►rill veld �GREELEY pFFICEepa►u Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing as a local contractor to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). As a contractor who has 'number of employees employees, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business and my employees. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate and employ people in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, --Pa-et- 71?-1162EXHIBIT [Your Name] RECEIVED JUN 15 2015 Logan West Weld County Fian50 3601 N Shields St. GREELEY g 7 rtment OFFICE Ft. Collins, CO 80524 June 5, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, l .0.47-sea Logan West EXHIBIT RFCEIVED .JUN 151015 Daniel Krause Weld County r'larmin ue FIC 220 Park Street GREELEY OFEftmerlt Fort Collins CO 80521 June 5, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N . 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners : I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project ( USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, Daniel Krause EXHIBIT RFcEivED JUN 15 2015 Robert Al!sup (eld County F'lannan 956 Ridge Runner Dr GREELEY UFFI� 1tment Ft. Collins, CO 80524 June 5, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project ( USR1S- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, 71./ 72..yecr Robert Allsup EXHIBIT RECEIVED JUN 15 2015 Jerimy A. Runner Weld County Planning Department 52301 Weld County Road 17 GREELEY OFFICE Carr, Co 80612 June 5, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N . 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners : As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project ( USR15-0027) . I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincere) J i li Jerimy . Runner EXHIBIT CFivED JUN 15 2015 Weld County Pldnnin GREELEy $p [fflient OicE Dan Stringer 3945 Landings Dr #G-5 Fort Collins CO 80525 June 2, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N . 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta' s Highway 34 Project ( USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, Dan Stringer EXHIBIT RFCF ! VED JUN 15 2015 David and Ginger Slatten 2412 North Taft Hill Road Weld County Planning uepartment GREELEY OFFICE Fort Collins, CO 80524 May 28, 2015 Weld County Commissioners c/o Dana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: We are writing to express our support for the approval of Martin Marietta' s Highway 34 Project (USR 15-0027). We understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. We, however, will benefit from this project through our region' s ability to repave our streets, build new retail centers, and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well-suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. We urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response. Sincerely, sOC(vv-e, Dave and Ginger Slatten EXHIBIT Marsha L. Mendenhall RECEI \IED 19231 Weld County Road 22 Fort Lupton, CO 80621 JUN 15 2015 June 4, 2015 Weld County Planning Department GREELEY OFFICE Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners . As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project ( USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, fljj47 :ekt 31ct4dQJt4 . Marsha L. Mendenhall EXHIBIT Mike W. Markham d/b/a Mike's Backhoe Service IECE ! \/ ED 19231 Weld County Road 22 n Fort Lupton, CO 80621 JUN 15 2015 June 4, 2015 Weld County Planning b Department GREELEY OFFICE Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst ( USR1S-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing as a local contractor and resident to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project ( USR15-0027). As a contractor, the success of my business is greatly dependent on the availability of cost effective building materials. The location of this asphalt/ready mix concrete plant will make it easier for my business to obtain the materials and will keep costs down, which in turn allows me to keep my costs lower. If these materials are not available, it will have a detrimental impact to my business. We will benefit from this project through our region's ability to repave local streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development thus providing for continued development and job creation for the region . The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited and situated for this type of project. This project will help control the escalating construction and infrastructure costs which are outpacing the growth of income in this area by providing one of the basic building components, aggregate and related products. This project will also support the economy of Weld County through easily accessible building materials, mitigating cost increases and keeping the local economy viable. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. While I recognize a group of neighbors living near the site have voiced dissatisfaction of location of facility, I would ask the commissioners to look at the benefits of this project to the greater community and local businesses like mine that operate in Weld County and nearby locations. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, Mike W. Markham d/b/a Mike's Backhoe Service EXHIBIT n D RECEIVED Lucinda S. Giblin 18983 Weld County Rd. 22 JUN 15 2015 Fort Lupton, CO 80621 June 4, 2015 Weld County Planning Department GREELEY OFFICE Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and took forward to your response ! Sincerely, ' 4/1/1/-kt_ li/la Lucinda S. Giblin EXHIBIT *v 52 Timothy J. Giblin RECEI , ED 18983 Weld County Rd. 22 Fort Lupton, CO 80621 JUN 15 2015 June 4, 2015 Weld County Planning Department GREELEY OFFICE Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, • IL, SYVU ' J g . 4 Timothy J. Gi in EXHIBIT 1 � `- / 3 RECEIVED [Your Name] 3 Co JUN 15 2015 ./1 eil-S [Street Address] ( / , � A � 7O qOCY [City, ST ZIP Code] -� �/ p Weld County Planning [ Y. t' GREELEY oFF Cpartment [Date] _ 2 7 I E 3 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners : As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, [Your Name] EXHIBIT RECEIVED (Your Name] fl , � i ) C. JUN 1520)� ?ju. c ( 5 (Street Address] �� b� $ l�C- -' ` Weld Cou t Flannrng Department PP1t Nille Cc' %O -3 a b [City, ST ZIP Code) -� GREELEY OFFjC [Date) 5 . a --i . i5 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project ( USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, [Your Name] Jail, lokA) cl EXHIBIT sr--r fr/ w/ A. [Your Name] / ! QJ � [Street Address] ,prf J-C) v n [City, ST ZIP Code] "6/1b)[Date] v 5/21j Weld County Commissioners RECEIVED c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning JUN 15 2015 1555 N. 17`h Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Weld County Planning uepartment GREELEY OFFICE Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, [Your Name] r ria) EXHIBIT VPW V [Your Name] Ailt[Street Address) I . [City, ST ZIP Code] �2 [Date] fee y f > z leise Weld County Commissioners RFCRVED c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027) Weld County Planning JUN 15 2015 1555 N . 17th Avenue Wefd County Planning Department Greeley, CO 80631 GREELEY OFFICE Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, _ [Your Name] EXHIBIT RECEIVED JUN 152015 Weld County Planning Department 04 1' 2A [Your Name] S D GREELEY OFFICE [Street Address] 4/cc IR a) Cr [City, ST ZIP Code] en- [City, . ,kt—05n Co gObO3 [Date] 5 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-OO27). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, [Your Name] (1-- EXHIBIT RFic F V ED f JUN 15 2015 [Your Name] V/CM el n;n Department &doe 9Weld CGREELEY OFFICE [Street Address] �l��S 3 [City, ST ZIP Code] ,� /G. ' ,7 't CO [Date] ,r6 2 ( S-21 -- 15 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners : As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project ( USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. 1, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, [Your N el EXHIBIT RECEIVE Rig 152015 Department ,4n PlannoFFICE 13 a,r 2. Cy-rt LA" VJ Eld GRE ELEY • 'tie- es -- Qs Pouafr - 1Co . gosi 7 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-OO27) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! SinccrL , EXHIBIT 4 ,e_jm/4-? /t/co,e _ R .F.CtIVED (9c29c %L9 d ane W D/ . JUN 152015 �) do , / 5 � � Weld County Planning Department �' " ��O�� l �� 1 GREELEY OFFICE Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project ( USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! ,v---) Sinyerely, 6 _ % a- 2 - /‘ EXHIBIT s-rof , crt- 0 ao RECEIVED JUN 152015 Yvelu County Planning Department GREELEY OFFICE Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project ( USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, EXHIBIT I RFCE ! VED JUN 152015 Lev I �^ey I q I� N��h s �� Weld County Planning Department GREELEY OFFICE Low 10,4 Cc4i CiD51.5 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N . 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners : I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project ( USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, 1,e0 ri PAray EXHIBIT Vtrp Qa, Jok VO ?oK7S3Sti as-+ C.o (101-‘ ( w VOQ--1 RECEIVED coo - 3occ--nio,7 JUN 15 2015 Weld County Planning Department Weld County Commissioners GREELEY OFFICE c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N . 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta' s Highway 34 Project (USR15- OO27) . I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, EXHIBIT asio elJVVLL< - (L' L& nook, uitA, c1,‘, es *- an r-L 6601"3 1- p K EIVED JUN 152015 Weld County Planning Department GREELEY OFFICE Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-OO27) Weld County Planning 1555 N . 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project ( USR15- 0027) . I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, 461,Vbetellipk_ej._ EXHIBIT /24 n Roc) r + 5 tA- c 2- 254 E � � ,� o � y jW RECEIVED Voc + • (011 )." 5. c o - yor2i JUN 15 2015 Weld County Planning Department GREELEY OFFICE Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N . 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project ( USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, 4 EXHIBIT 1 crtqo RECE D r ` -e C S JUN 15 2015 WS County Planning Department GREELEY OFFICE Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners : As a resident of Weld County, I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15-0027). I understand that some in our community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one of thousands of citizens who will benefit from this project through our community's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our community will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, EXHIBIT COSA/kJ 0 I"- VA • L tor O 4 re Llotto bt...1QL bt O fQc 4 e- , Gc • SOS 3 S Weld County Commissioners P ' " F ! V ED c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) JUN 15 2015 Weld County Planning 1555 N . 17th Avenue Weld County Planning Department Greeley, CO 80631 GREELEY OFFICE Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027) . I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very dose to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, EXHIBIT PECFJVED et V1 ohs JUN 15 2015 6,0 X1 7 j5iy,7L ce P. Weld County Planning Department 7 O///th Co ,r�O GREELEY OFFICE ent Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027) . I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, et EXHIBIT &Ai 17, u %di R _ zu V ED 66 c,p u tea- 1. a u -e it a. JUN 15 2015 400 S 37 Weld County Funning vepariment GREELEY OFFICE Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N . 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project ( USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, EXHIBIT 2nito 3 c t J OM ( ' \ (a �� S tiyii F rti Gt, 1 r ff 3� 4 cp (( Ls 40. ICS; y RCE ! vED JUN 15 2015 Weld County Planning Department GREELEY OFFICE Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N . 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project ( USR15- OO27) . I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, • EXHIBIT 6_a r rrLrrs issoS O) (7 ef G W --- 7 A4f9ar7e eo . ROS 3 5 RECEIVED JUN 15 2015 Weld County Planning Department GREELEY OFFICE Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N . 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project ( USR15- 0027) . I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, C/4/(6,not, ^ 4,144 ±) EXHIBIT A S11L 3 Vetv(\. 5 Scci ( 309 5 > RECEIVED Fbri--dco ' JUP� i ost ) Weld County Planning 151�de5pal) rtment GREELEY OFFICE Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project ( USR15- OO27) . I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, EXHIBIT n r,i ,r F ! � 1�I4A// I ; 6 ' ,C l/ /24)Atcr4 &-r JUN 15 2015 k- 60a/n $ F0 $ Weld County Planning Department GREELEY OFFICE Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N . 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project ( USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, d. EXHIBIT RECEIVED ileretb4t‘ 3w4uPttt ' 2015 r � �� Weld CountyJUN Planning15 liepartment a600 f GREELEY OFFICE Far eo f 113-3 co s?vo 5 k) Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning . 1555 N . 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR1S- 0027) . I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, i G' ife. Q� EXHIBIT S 2-7.5q d RECEIVED 2y3y 6 rat AWE. JUN 15 2015 6-re. CO , Weld CGREELEYnOFFICErtment Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N . 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, -- I EXMB RC ! VrD /t4501 JUN 152015 / If' D;404ot j Weld County Planning Department F GREELEY OFFICE Love4id , CO - jo577 Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR1S-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am:writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. 1, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, • EXHIBIT 00neu I retsrLts CFV ) rti) -vs,;i3 `f 6260:7$ JUN 152015 G-re(.e y Co . "O63, Weld County Planning Department GREELEY OFFICE Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N . 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project ( USR15- 0027) . I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your responsel Sincerely, s(a-Qt . sae EXHIBIT I a. cm , er ovNaAr\-\-_eqe V 001 \(\-ec -e- 31 ( ) k VD n * sc Lioak- RECE ! V Ei D Lu �� \c,), LI \ , ( JUN 15 2015 Weld County Planning Department GREELEY OFFICE • Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR1S-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: 1 am_writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- O027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project'site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, . c..,___. \ _ / ----(p.,,,,,, . . EXHIBIT \\akek h TYLLaki Z 1 n 0 rs-c (A/KJ ., ! D WkI1J- YON(\, 5-9-C) JUN 15 2015 Weld County Planning A Plannin J Ue artment GREELEY OFFICE Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am:writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (U5R15- 0027). • ye I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project*site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, Z\Sor , EXHIBIT Anare* .' farnase- ' 33 2S Iron -tors e„ U Likutt(nincico gay ct q 1FCEIVED JUN 15 2045 Weld County Planning Department GREELEY OFFICE Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am:writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- .0027). 4w V. I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project.site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, EXHIBIT („Irs) JUSkt IV 401 °Di r \ rcEIvLD -iski 3 7 -wid (� j t o } i Or JUN 152015 CO ) dl !J J Wetd County Planning Department �� S vGREELEY OFFICE Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am:writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). • 3. 4, I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very dose to majot highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, EXHIBIT tan3 bencfc'_ odocioon vii\AH (0 (01 _ c,\R • (ton, CC CYD(349 RECEIVED JUN 15 2010 Weld County Planning Department GREELEY OFFICE Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am:writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). • ,t. „, I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The projecfsite is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a focal source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, A EXHIBIT R,HECFIVED t/v) r �- - JUN 15 2015 260 Weld County Planning Department LA; (NW Q-(91 GREELEY OFFICE Th, r Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am:,writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- O027). ye . u. I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project.site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Si cerely, •itt EXHIBIT nz ( o hTh3o ' / LI 0 / joy c_ d) 7 / ( 71 ec.) ,)--95cv 2Jo {f - 4L7L7 - rr % flr °'% Weld County Commissioners 77) t• V c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027) Weld County Planning JUN 15 2015 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 vvelil County Pinning uepaiunent GREELEY OFFICE Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, EXHIBIT CriC Sn9 t6 rill Oily ile0( ZS /71---(0/7 A fe (ea 9 70 r Sr-Tr- 707 !cry: IV :en Weld County Commissioners t� � c/o Diana Aungst (USR1S-0027) Iut4 15 2015 Weld County Planning •1 ueNartment 1555 N. 17th Avenue Planning Weld COUOty Greeley, CO 80631 EELE`( OFFICE Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project ( USR1S- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, EXHIBIT D A 3 P r- frmutrar)v O, 713 �.X',e-- / 3 JUJU 15 2015 7.-k �� /6.64/s. Eci 8bSctWeld GO Nlanrtir�� GREELEy OF �F rrment FI Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I arn:writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). y,..4. I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project•site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, 0671/AA:14 EXHIBIT -- w SaCts3 D RECE W D JUN 15 2015 H ;co ) ic6w/c Weld County Planning Department 4/678 WC /p / 3 GREELEY OFFICE 7Cd ns �o 9o52c/ t Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N . 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project ( USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! ply, &it EXHIBIT (Mk t ( Ail(le 5es_ 5. r � r`pl� �� r�.1 Lo, ,� �5"�f SUN l 5 We- � -�-�n G �' i � i5 ( 1 ) , Weld Cot►r�ty P1ar�nr��n � , , GREELEi t�eLarrment OFFICE Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N . 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners. I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project ( USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of. project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, EXHIBIT RECEIVraD rc,C Ca C JUN 1 1-)1 5 2015 3 �) �1'` <� ,r h r Weld County Planning Department Vim, ��" Ce, tlty\ s, CO 5, 05 Z3, GREELEY OFFICE 000 / / Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners : I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project ( USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. i, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, 1.6/1tract S e r EXHIBIT RECEIVED JUN 15 2015 ----&6k 0- FO eN Weld County Planning Department N uj k+1Lo ,Mj GREELEY OFFICE Fp Cs9W in 5 � c� se)c>� Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N . 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project ( USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, ` EXHIBIT - L „On_ D RECE ! VFD JUN 15 2015 � r Weld County Plannir;g �ePaament 60-1,-"(149 I , ` / ////771,/,2 GREELEY OFFICE L/ 819 /„. /?/4- / c/I-Qi i_V- - Weld alinty CommissQdeg c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! r. Sincerely, / #1:- /-t, G h �--/ \O7.eh' c houl4e, MVc LO ktui rkiss to in . G , 9 - t LT EXHIBIT RECEIVED JUN 152015 -06 e` c c.` Weld County Planning Department [Your Name] S GREELEY OFF1dE [Street Address] 2_ 22 tN • w ieN, ' L ()IA"A [City, ST ZIP Code] -ro 1- ( es ``' Vit S co ICC) h2 I [Date] to - CI I Sr Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response! Sincerely, cst„ [Your Name] c, S ,p o d C EXHIBIT 131 -� � js° g, `3`? -6ce prier : tiLts....„ ElvrD JUN 15 2015 Weld County Planning Department GREELEY OFFICE Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners : I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR1S- 0027) . I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, EXHIBIT UUi t &tJ 201 ;4, coo, R j V Lt.' 'L R9 0-5i' a c , cc7 3d5g.5 JUN 152015 Weld County Harming pepdrunent b/oVi 5GREELEY OFFICE • Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst (USR15-O027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, EXHIBIT i REacfilirp • . ¶?obert Bectc1 , 15 2015 � 9o'4 { 'Veld CountyJUN ManningDrt C tntS u df ,, GREELEY OFFICE t %o\ e ittedd co , gosR . Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N . 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners : I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project ( USR15- 0027) . I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, a(11Q41i EXHIBIT 2 3a_ Skye. L1_O\fici. 5 ( Oar p.Air\ar\( it (U\v\cS& t/ Co 0510 RECE1VLD JUN 15 2015 Weld County Planning ucpartrnen• GREELEY OFFICE Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027 ) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners : I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027) . I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, \61/4(C. Ur)" EXHIBIT 45160 k. EcF7vn) JUN 15 2015 Weld County Planning ucya inert GREELEY OFFICE (-2 r c-- 1Th ci.12 EC/ c L I, `), S- d; M ed I 1 L o//, i✓x C ' p porr Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners : I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027) . I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for. this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, ft — • it el 6-- (Th P aryl/ • EXHIBIT 670/37-bithER 331'! 4PPLC keNuE RECErvr7D JUN 15 2015 ms� LoU Weld County Planning Depill anent GREELEY OFFICE Weld County Commissioners c/o Diana Aungst ( USR15-0027) Weld County Planning 1555 N . 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: I am writing to express my full support for the approval of Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project (USR15- 0027). I understand that some in the community have voiced concerns over the project. I, however, am one who will benefit from this project through our regions's ability to repave my streets, build new retail centers and increase economic growth through housing and business development. The project site is located between two active railroads and very close to major highways, which makes it well suited for this type of project. Our region will benefit from the project as the cost to construct vital infrastructure required to support the continued economic growth may be completed at a reasonable cost as compared to importing materials. Additionally, the project will allow needed natural resources to be imported by train to the site, providing a local source and reducing the amount of trucks bringing this material from ever increasing distances. I urge you to approve Martin Marietta's Highway 34 Project and look forward to your response ! Sincerely, 6-1 7-0P 41N EXHIBIT A Hello