HomeMy WebLinkAbout20162652.tiffBEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Moved by Terry Cross. that the following resolution be introduced for passage by the Weld County Planning
Commission Be it resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the application for -
CASE NUMBER
APPLICANT
PLANNER
REQUEST
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LOCATION
USR 16-0017
CRAIG & CORY ROEHRS
RYDER REDDICK
A SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW
PERMIT FOR ONE (1) SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT PER LOT OTHER
THAN THOSE PERMITTED UNDER SECTION 23-3-20 A (SECOND SINGLE-
FAMILY DWELLING UNIT) IN THE A (AGRICULTURAL) ZONE DISTRICT
LOT 3 HIGHLAND ESTATES PART OF SECTION 3. T3N R68W OF THE 6TH
P M WELD COUNTY COLORADO
SOUTH OF AND ADJACENT TO CR 38 AND EAST APPROXIMATELY 0 4 MILES
FROM CR 7
be recommended favorably to the Board of County Commissioners for the following reasons.
1 The submitted materials are in compliance with the application requirements of Section 23-2-260 of
the Weld County Code
2. It is the opinion of the Planning Commission that the applicant has shown compliance with Section 23-
2-220 of the Weld County Code as follows:
A Section 23-2-220 A.1 -- The proposed use is consistent with Chapter 22 and any other
applicable code provisions or ordinance in effect.
Section 22-2-20.F.3. - A. Policy 6.3. states, "Encourage multi -generational, caretaker guest
and accessory quarters."
The proposed second single family dwelling would be built for the primary purpose of
being used as a second dwelling supporting family members.
Section 22-2-20. H - A. Goal 8. states. "Ensure that adequate services and facilities are
currently available or reasonably obtainable to accommodate the requested new land use
change for more intensive development. "
There is currently water and septic provided to the property. Little Thompson Water
District provides the water through tap #674 and intends to supply water to the proposed
secondary dwelling as stated in their letter dated March 21. 2016 which was submitted in the
USR application. The existing septic system permitted on the property under permit
#G19890299 is sized for up to 4 bedrooms According to the Department of Public Health and
Environment referral dated June 20. 2016 the septic field will need to be expanded to
accommodate the new residence. A repair permit, along with an additional septic tank will be
required for the second dwelling if approved. While the septic is undersized for the new
proposal as it is today, this referral letter explains that it is reasonably obtainable to upgrade
the septic system on site to support the new proposed development.
B Section 23-2-220 A.2 -- The proposed use is consistent with the intent of the A (Agricultural)
Zone District.
Section 23-3-40 M Allows for one (1) single-family dwelling unit per lot other than those
permitted under section 23-3-20 A. (second single-family dwelling unit) in the Agriculture (A)
Zone District
C Section 23-2-220.A.3 -- The uses which will be permitted will be compatible with the existing
surrounding land uses.
The use and size of the Lots around the property are primarily single family residences on
parcels that range between 1 5 and 3 acres in size The adjacent properties on the south side
of County Road 38 are all located within the Highland Estates Subdivision The adjacent
4014 - c71(5s
RESOLUTION USR16-0017
CRAIG & CORY ROEHRS
PAGE 2
parcels to the north of County Road 38 are located within the Town of Mead in the Margil
Farms Subdivision which are similar in size and use
There are currently no Use by Special Review Permits issued in the Highland Estates
Subdivision This proposed permit is for a second residence for family members which would
complement the existing surrounding residential land uses.
The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received two (2) responses from the
same surrounding property owner in opposition to this proposed application.
In a letter received by the Department of Planning Services on June 21, 2016 a neighboring
property owner who resides approximately 0.25 miles south of the proposed site. expressed a
variety of concerns and had many questions about the impacts this second dwelling could
have on the neighboring parcels of land. In a second letter received by the planning
department on July 11, 2016 the neighboring property owner stated that the applicants
attempted to contact him about the concerns in his initial letter however they were unable to
work out a resolution to these concerns.
Section 23-2-220.A.4 -- The uses which will be permitted will be compatible with future
development of the surrounding area as permitted by the existing zoning and with the future
development as projected by Chapter 22 of the Weld County Code and any other applicable
code provisions or ordinances in effect, or the adopted Master Plans of affected
municipalities.
The site is located within the three (3) mile referral area of the Town of Mead and the Town of
Berthoud. The site is also located within the Mead IGA. Neither town provided referral
comments.
Section 23-2-220.A.5 -- The application complies with Chapter 23, Articles V and Xl. of the
Weld County Code.
The site is not in a floodplain.
Building Permits issued on the lot will be required to adhere to the fee structure of the
County -Wide Road Impact Fee Program
Building Permits issued on the proposed lot will be required to adhere to the fee structure of
the County Facility Fee and Drainage Impact Fee Programs.
Section 23-2-220 A.6 -- The applicant has demonstrated a diligent effort to conserve prime
agricultural land in the locational decision for the proposed use.
The proposed home site is located on approximately 2 acres in a platted subdivision_ The soil
designation for the site is 'Other per the 1979 Soil Conservation Service Important
Farmlands of Weld County Map. Due to the classification given. the proposed USR will not
take "Prime (Irrigated)" Farmland out of production.
Section 23-2-220.A.7 — There is adequate provisions for the protection of the health. safety,
and welfare of the inhabitants of the neighborhood and County
The Design Standards (Section 23-2-240. Weld County Code). Operation Standards (Section
23-2-250. Weld County Code), Conditions of Approval and Development Standards can
ensure that there are adequate provisions for the protection of health, safety. and welfare of
the inhabitants of the neighborhood and County.
This recommendation is based. in part, upon a review of the application materials submitted by the applicant,
other relevant information regarding the request. and responses from referral entities.
RESOLUTION USR16-0017
CRAIG & CORY ROEHRS
PAGE 3
The Planning Commission recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following
1 Prior to recording the map -
A. The Map shall be amended to delineate the following.
1 All sheets of the map shall be labeled USR16-0017 (Department of Planning Services)
2 The attached Development Standards (Department of Planning Services)
3 The map shall be prepared in accordance with Section 23-2-260.D of the Weld County
Code. (Department of Planning Services)
4 County Road 38 is maintained by the Town of Mead. The Municipality has jurisdiction
over all accesses within their jurisdiction. Please contact municipality to verify the access
permit or for any additional requirement that may be needed to obtain or upgrade the
permit. (Department of Public Works)
5 The applicant shall show and label the subdivision drainage features and drainage flow
arrows on the lot. (Department of Planning Services — Engineer)
2 Upon completion of Condition of Approval #1 above. the applicant shall submit one (1) paper copy or
one (1) electronic copy ( pdf) of the map for preliminary approval to the Weld County Department of
Planning Services Upon approval of the map the applicant shall submit a Mylar map along with all
other documentation required as Conditions of Approval. The Mylar map shall be recorded in the
office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder by the Department of Planning Services The map shall
be prepared in accordance with the requirements of Section 23-2-260.D of the Weld County Code.
The Mylar map and additional requirements shall be submitted within one hundred twenty (120) days
from the date of the Board of County Commissioners Resolution. The applicant shall be responsible
for paying the recording fee. (Department of Planning Services)
3. In accordance with Weld County Code Ordinance #2012-3. approved April 30, 2012. should the map
not be recorded within the required one hundred twenty (120) days from the date of the Board of
County Commissioners Resolution, a $50.00 recording continuance charge shall added for each
additional three (3) month period_ (Department of Planning Services)
4. The Department of Planning Services respectfully requests a digital copy of this "Use by Special
Review". as appropriate Acceptable format is a projected ESRI shapefile (_shp. shx..dbf..prj) with a
defined coordinate system (i.e NAD 1983 UTM Zone 13N. WGS 1984. NAD 1983 HARN StatePlane
Colorado North FIPS 0501 (US Feet).. .etc.). This digital file may be sent to mapsco.weld.co.us.
(Department of Planning Services)
5. Prior to Construction:
A. If more than 1 acre is to be disturbed. a Weld County grading permit will be required prior to the
start of construction. (Department of Planning Services - Engineer)
B Right of way permit is required for any work within the Town of Mead public right of way
(Department of Planning Services - Engineer)
6. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy'
A An onsite wastewater treatment system is required for the proposed residence and shall be
installed according to the Weld County Onsite Wastewater Treatment System Regulations.
(Department of Public Health and Environment)
RESOLUTION USR16-0017
CRAIG & CORY ROEHRS
PAGE 4
7. The Use by Special Review activity shall not occur. nor shall any building or electrical permits be
issued on the property. until the Use by Special Review plat is ready to be recorded in the office of the
Weld County Clerk and Recorder or the applicant has been approved for an early release agreement.
(Department of Planning Services)
Motion seconded by Gene Stifle.
VOTE
For Passage
Against Passage
Bruce Johnson
Bruce Sparrow
Absent
Cherilyn Barringer
Joyce Smock
Terry Cross
Gene Stille
The Chair declared the resolution passed and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this
case to the Board of County Commissioner's for further proceedings.
Jordan Jemiola
Michael Wailes
Tom Cope
CERTIFICATION OF COPY
I. Kristine Ranslem. Recording Secretary for the Weld County Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the
above and foregoing resolution is a true copy of the resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County.
Colorado. adopted on August 16. 2016
Dated the 16'h of August. 2016
LCb6w se?allaudiet,
Kristine Ranslem
Secretary
Digitally signed by Kristine
Ranslem
Date: 2016.08.19 08:53:06 -06'00'
SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN
USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Craig and Cory Roehrs
USR16-0017
A Site Specific Development Plan and Use by Special Review Permit, USR16-0017, for one (1) single-
family dwelling unit per lot other than those permitted under Section 23-3-20.A. (second single-family
dwelling unit), in the A (Agricultural) Zone District. subject to the Development Standards stated hereon.
(Department of Planning Services)
2 Approval of this plan may create a vested property right pursuant to Section 23-8-10 of the Weld County
Code (Department of Planning Services)
3. Waste materials shall be handled. stored. and disposed in a manner that controls fugitive dust. fugitive
particulate emissions. blowing debris, and other potential nuisance conditions. The facility shall operate in
accordance with Chapter 14, Article 1 of the Weld County Code. (Department of Public Health and
Environment)
4. Fugitive dust should attempt to be confined on the property Uses on the property should comply with the
Colorado Air Quality Commission's air quality regulations. (Department of Public Health and Environment)
5. A permanent. adequate water supply shall be provided for drinking and sanitary purposes (Department of
Public Health and Environment)
6. Any septic system located on the property must comply with all provisions of the Weld County Code,
pertaining to Onsite Waste Water Treatment Systems. (Department of Public Health and Environment)
7. The operation shall comply with all applicable rules and regulations of State and Federal agencies and the
Weld County Code. (Department of Public Health and Environment)
8. The property owner shall control noxious weeds on the site (Department of Public Works)
9. The historical flow patterns and runoff amounts on the site will be maintained. (Department of Planning
Services - Engineer)
10 Building permits may be required, per Section 29-3-10 of the Weld County Code Currently, the following
have been adopted by Weld County- 2012 International Codes, 2006 International Energy Code. and 2014
National Electrical Code. A Building Permit Application must be completed and two (2) complete sets of
engineered plans bearing the wet stamp of a Colorado registered architect or engineer must be submitted
for review A Geotechnical Engineering Report performed by a Colorado registered engineer shall be
required or an Open Hole Inspection. (Department of Building Inspection)
11 The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Design and Operation
Standards of Chapter 23 of the Weld County Code
12. Necessary personnel from the Weld County Departments of Planning Services, Public Works. and Public
Health and Environment shall be granted access onto the property at any reasonable time in order to
ensure the activities carried out on the property comply with the Conditions of Approval and Development
Standards stated herein and all applicable Weld County regulations
13. The Use by Special Review area shall be limited to the plans shown hereon and governed by the
foregoing standards and all applicable Weld County regulations Substantial changes from the plans or
Development Standards. as shown or stated. shall require the approval of an amendment of the Permit by
the Weld County Board of County Commissioners before such changes from the plans or Development
Standards are permitted. Any other changes shall be filed in the office of the Department of Planning
Services
14 The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with all of the foregoing Development
Standards Noncompliance with any of the foregoing Development Standards may be reason for
revocation of the Permit by the Board of County Commissioners
RESOLUTION USR16-0017
CRAIG & CORY ROEHRS
PAGE 6
15 RIGHT TO EXTRACT MINERAL RESOURCES STATEMENT Weld County has some of the most
abundant mineral resources. including, but not limited to. sand and gravel. oil. natural gas. and coal.
Under title 34 of the Colorado Revised Statutes. minerals are vital resources because (a) the state's
commercial mineral deposits are essential to the state's economy. (b) the populous counties of the state
face a critical shortage of such deposits: and (c) such deposits should be extracted according to a rational
plan, calculated to avoid waste of such deposits and cause the least practicable disruption of the ecology
and quality of life of the citizens of the populous counties of the state_
Mineral resource locations are widespread throughout the County and person moving into these areas
must recognize the various impacts associated with this development. Often times, mineral resource sites
are fixed to their geographical and geophysical locations Moreover. these resources are protected
property rights and mineral owners should be afforded the opportunity to extract the mineral resource.
16 WELD COUNTY'S RIGHT TO FARM Weld County is one of the most productive agricultural counties in
the United States, typically ranking in the top ten counties in the country in total market value of
agricultural products sold. The rural areas of Weld County may be open and spacious, but they are
intensively used for agriculture. Persons moving into a rural area must recognize and accept there are
drawbacks. including conflicts with long-standing agricultural practices and a lower level of services than
in town. Along with the drawbacks come the incentives which attract urban dwellers to relocate to rural
areas open views. spaciousness. wildlife. lack of city noise and congestion. and the rural atmosphere
and way of life. Without neighboring farms. those features which attract urban dwellers to rural Weld
County would quickly be gone forever.
Agricultural users of the land should not be expected to change their long-established agricultural
practices to accommodate the intrusions of urban users into a rural area. Well -run agricultural activities
will generate off -site impacts. including noise from tractors and equipment: slow -moving farm vehicles on
rural roads, dust from animal pens, field work. harvest and gravel roads: odor from animal confinement,
silage and manure: smoke from ditch burning: flies and mosquitoes: hunting and trapping activities:
shooting sports. legal hazing of nuisance wildlife. and the use of pesticides and fertilizers in the fields.
including the use of aerial spraying It is common practice for agricultural producers to utilize an
accumulation of agricultural machinery and supplies to assist in their agricultural operations A
concentration of miscellaneous agricultural materials often produces a visual disparity between rural and
urban areas of the County Section 35-3.5-102. C.R S . provides that an agricultural operation shall not be
found to be a public or private nuisance if the agricultural operation alleged to be a nuisance employs
methods or practices that are commonly or reasonably associated with agricultural production.
Water has been, and continues to be. the lifeline for the agricultural community It is unrealistic to assume
that ditches and reservoirs may simply be moved "out of the way" of residential development. When
moving to the County. property owners and residents must realize they cannot take water from irrigation
ditches lakes. or other structures, unless they have an adjudicated right to the water
Weld County covers a land area of approximately four thousand (4.000) square miles in size (twice the
size of the State of Delaware) with more than three thousand seven hundred (3,700) miles of state and
county roads outside of municipalities. The sheer magnitude of the area to be served stretches available
resources. Law enforcement is based on responses to complaints more than on patrols of the County,
and the distances which must be traveled may delay all emergency responses, including law enforcement,
ambulance. and fire Fire protection is usually provided by volunteers who must leave their jobs and
families to respond to emergencies. County gravel roads, no matter how often they are bladed, will not
provide the same kind of surface expected from a paved road. Snow removal priorities mean that roads
from subdivisions to arterials may not be cleared for several days after a major snowstorm Services in
rural areas, in many cases. will not be equivalent to municipal services. Rural dwellers must. by
necessity. be more self-sufficient than urban dwellers
People are exposed to different hazards in the County than in an urban or suburban setting. Farm
equipment and oil field equipment, ponds and irrigation ditches. electrical power for pumps and center
pivot operations. high speed traffic, sandburs, puncture vines. territorial farm dogs and livestock. and open
burning present real threats Controlling children's activities is important. not only for their safety. but also
for the protection of the farmer's livelihood.
PC t•1Nv- S
SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
Tuesday. August 16, 2016
A regular meeting of the Weld County Planning Commission was held in the Weld County Administration
Building. Hearing Room. 1150 O Street. Greeley. Colorado. This meeting was called to order by Chair,
Bruce Sparrow, at 12:36 pm.
Roll Call.
Present. Bruce Johnson, Bruce Sparrow, Cherilyn Barringer, Gene Stille. Joyce Smock, Terry Cross. Tom
Cope
Absent. Jordan Jemiola. Michael Wailes.
Also Present_ Kim Ogle. Chris Gathman, Diana Aungst. and Ryder Reddick. Department of Planning
Services: Hayley Brown. Department of Planning Services — Engineering Division; Lauren Light and Ben
Fussell. Department of Health, Evan Pinkham, Public Works; Bob Choate, County Attorney. and Kris
Ranslem. Secretary.
Motion: Approve the August 2, 2016 Weld County Planning Commission minutes. Moved by Bruce
Johnson, Seconded by Joyce Smock. Motion passed unanimously
CASE NUMBER
APPLICANT
PLANNER
REQUEST
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LOCATION
USR16-0017
CRAIG & CORY ROEHRS
RYDER REDDICK
A SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW
PERMIT FOR ONE (1) SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT PER LOT OTHER
THAN THOSE PERMITTED UNDER SECTION 23-3-20.A (SECOND SINGLE-
FAMILY DWELLING UNIT) IN THE A (AGRICULTURAL) ZONE DISTRICT.
LOT 3 HIGHLAND ESTATES. PART OF SECTION 3. T3N, R68W OF THE 6TH
P M.. WELD COUNTY COLORADO
SOUTH OF AND ADJACENT TO CR 38 AND EAST APPROXIMATELY 0.4
MILES FROM CR 7
Ryder Reddick. Planning Services. presented Case USR16-0017, reading the recommendation and
comments into the record. Mr Reddick noted that three (3) letters were received in opposition to this
request citing concerns in regard to allowing a second residence for rental purposes and that it is not
allowed in the Subdivision convenants. He added that one (1) phone call was received in support of this
request. The Department of Planning Services recommends approval of this application with the attached
conditions of approval and development standards
Evan Pinkham. Public Works. reported on the existing traffic and access to the site.
Hayley Brown. Engineering, reported on the drainage conditions for the site.
Lauren Light. Environmental Health. reviewed the public water and sanitary sewer requirements. on -site
dust control. and the Waste Handling Plan.
Craig Roehrs. 3380 CR 38. stated that they moved to this rural residential property to be able to have
horses and space for their family His wife's mother is a large part of their family and they are planning to
build this residence for her. Mr Roehrs stated that per the Weld County Code it is encouraged to have
multi -generational. caretaker. guest and accessory quarters The ability for his mother-in-law to live on site
would provide farm and animal assistance and assistance with kids' school and extracurricular activities. It
would also allow for caregiving during her golden years_
Commissioner Johnson asked what the intent of the residence will be after it serves its intended purpose.
Mr Roehrs said that the intent is not to generate supplemental income but they would like to reserve the
right to use it as a rental.
Commissioner Sparrow said that that landowners in Highland Estates understood that only one home would
be built on each lot and asked the applicant to address their concerns of having a second home. Mr Roehrs
said that they understand their concerns, however the intent is not to have the second home as a rental
unit
Commissioner Cross asked what the size of the proposed home is. Mr Roehrs replied that it will be 1145
square feet
Commissioner Barringer asked the applicant why they don't add onto the existing home Mr. Roehrs said
that they wanted to preserve the footprint of the surrounding areas and not to have any odd shape or
disproportionate wing off of the home. He added that they did research that; however in the way the house
is constructed into the ground it would be difficult to match the elevation.
Cory Roehrs, 3380 CR 38. stated that they talked with all of their adjacent neighbors and added that they
are in full support. She added that they have researched how to add onto the house: however the cost was
astronomical compared to a second dwelling
The Chair asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for or against this application.
Al Roberts, 3494 Fairways Drive, stated that there are protective covenants in place for this subdivision
since 1972. He added that in the covenants it states that a dwelling unit needs to be a minimum of 1000
square foot in size and the proposed second home is 990 square foot in size_ The original plat was for 26
single-family homes built on 53 acres_ Mr Roberts asked if this is approved then what prevents the other
landowners in Highland Estates to construct a second dwelling unit. He added that this is not keeping with
the rural atmosphere of this subdivision Mr Roberts expressed concern with what happens when they no
longer need it for a caretaker residence
Barbara Foley. 17918 Wagon Trail, Mead. Colorado, stated that they purchased their property
understanding Highland Estates was for only single family homes. She added that the developer specified
this in his protective covenants She suggested that the Roehrs' build an addition that is physically attached
to their existing home.
Mr Roehrs said it is a desirable area as it is a rural setting. He said that there has been positive feedback
and no one has had any major concerns with a potential rental property He said the square footage of the
building will not detract from the area but will only enhance the neighborhood.
Patrick Chandler, 1601 Saunders Street, Longmont. Colorado. cited Section 22-2-20 which states that it
encourages multi -generational. caretaker, guest and accessory quarters_ He said that the proposed home
will be 1190 square foot in size. He added that any of the existing homes could be used as rental properties
currently
Commissioner Stille asked if there is a legal issue in regard to convenants. Bob Choate, County Attorney,
said the covenants are a private contractual dispute and the Board of County Commissioners has
consistently declined to consider enforcing private covenants on the properties. He added that it is
reasonable to take them into account: however typically the development standards do not protect those
covenants
Commissioner Cope asked the applicant if they intended to build a second home when they purchased the
property in this subdivision Mr. Roehrs said that they would never have entered into the purchase
agreement of this home if there was any indication that this would not have been a successful venture Mr
Cope said that the intent for an accessory use was more for larger agricultural parcels and not subdivided
lands He feels that an addition to the existing home would be more appropriate. Mr. Roehrs said that they
are learning a lot as they go and they are not trying to be an exception to any rule. He said that he doesn't
see the difference between expanding onto the home or having a separate unit that isn't going to be any
more obstructive than any other building out there. regardless of the use He added that they came into
this with full disclosure and nothing to hide
The Chair asked the applicant if they have read through the Development Standards and Conditions of
Approval and if they are in agreement with those The applicant replied that they are in agreement
2
Commissioner Stille understands the particular need for this in the code as he has been in a similar
situation He added that when the applicants get older they will need assistant care as well.
Motion: Forward Case USR16-0017 to the Board of County Commissioners along with the Conditions of
Approval and Development Standards with the Planning Commissions recommendation of denial, Moved
by Bruce Johnson. Seconded by Tom Cope.
Commissioner Johnson cited Section 23-2-220 A.2 and Section 23-2-220 A 3 as it is not consistent with
the neighborhood as it is a full subdivision.
Vote: Motion failed (summary: Yes = 3. No = 4, Abstain = 0)
Yes: Bruce Johnson. Bruce Sparrow. Tom Cope.
No: Cherilyn Barringer, Gene Stifle. Joyce Smock. Terry Cross.
Commissioner Cross said that he views this, besides the use of a mother-in-law house. as potentially a
guest house which could possibly enhance the value of the property_ He doesn't see an explosion of the
neighbors building another house on their lot.
Commissioner Stille agreed with Mr. Cross and understands the need for this in the code.
Commissioner Barringer doesn t see this anymore obstructive than a barn or a shop.
Commissioner Smock said that there are some real advantages to having this type of situation
Commissioner Sparrow said that by buying a home in this subdivision the applicant entered into an
agreement or contract that you are only able to have one home per lot. He added that he doesn't think it
will hurt the property values.
Motion: Forward Case USR16-0017 to the Board of County Commissioners along with the Conditions of
Approval and Development Standards with the Planning Commission's recommendation of approval.
Moved by Terry Cross. Seconded by Gene Stille
Vote: Motion passed (summary: Yes = 4. No = 3, Abstain = 0).
Yes: Cherilyn Barringer. Gene Stille. Joyce Smock. Terry Cross
No: Bruce Johnson. Bruce Sparrow. Tom Cope
Meeting adjourned at 3:45 pm.
Respectfully submitted,
‘11AO61/11- 41.11401AMt
Kristine Ranslem
Secretary
Digitally signed by Kristine Ranslem
Date: 2016.08.19 08:44:29 -06'00'
3
Hello