HomeMy WebLinkAbout790593.tiff p. _ - F.fir'
: . .gyp...,,.. . . - . .. ....
.
_
h,
SECOND QUARTERLY REPORT 1979
WELD COUNTY JAIL
INTAKE/CLASSIFICATION UNIT
.
4
4
y . _
INDEX
PAGE NUMBER
OVERVIEW 1
THE PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES 2
Objective I 2
Objective II 4
ObjectiveIII 9
Objective IV 10
Objective V 11
Objecitve VI 12
Objective VII 12
Objective VIII 13
Objective IX 13
Objective X 14
Objective XI 14
EFFECTIVENESS MEASURES 14
PROBLEMS 16
PROJECT CHANGES 17
OTHER ACTIVITIES 17
ADDENDW6: 19
(1`''
LIST OF CHARTS
Chart Number Page Number
1, Part A Booking Data by Month Four A
1, Part B Summary of Data by Quarter Four A
2 Major Referrals Provided by In-House
Staff and Outside Agencies Five A & B
3 GED Program Six
4 Alcoholic Anonymous Seven
5 Alcoholic Rehabilitation Center Seven
6 Special Custody Problems Eight
7 Initial Intake Screening Interviews Nine
8 Pre-release Planning by Type Eleven
9 Referrals of Inmates' Families Eleven
10 Pre-release State Correctional Counseling Twelve
LIST OF ADDENDA
Addendum Number Page Number
1 Final Grant Revision 19
2, Exhibit 1 Intake Data Sheet form 27
2, Exhibit 2 Data over and above IDS for computer 28
2, Exhibit 3 List and description of tests to be ordered 30
3, Exhibit 1,2,3,4 Resumes 31
4 Management by Objectives, Key Results 41
5 Inmate Request/Complaint form 47
6 Inmate Assessment form 48
7 Officer Inmate Observation Report 50
8 Report to Probation 51
DCJ Form 7R
COLORADO DIVISION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE
SUBGRANT NARRATIVE REPORT
ubgrantee: Project Number: Date:
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO 77-AGE-10C-(1)-C2-119 April 15, 1979
Project Title: Type of Report: Sequence Number:
INTAKE/CLASSIFICATION UNIT Progress Final❑ SECOND
roject Duration: Report for Quarter Ending:
From Jan 1979 To March 1979 Marg June❑ Sept❑ Dec❑
NOTE: Prepare this report according to the instructions on the reverse side. Requests
for funds may be denied unless this report is complete and filed on time as
required by the Division of Criminal Justice Administrative Guide.
BEGIN REPORT HERE: PROJECT STATUS
OVERVIEW
After a rather lengthy delay, the Classification/Intake (C/I) Section is finally
operational . Due to problems that Weld County Personnel had in recruiting qualified
personnel for the positions, we did not have a full staff compliment until late March.
We are now back on schedule (see Grant, Section 38.3) and are well into our orientation
training phase. Equipment and supplies have been ordered and we now have sufficient
resources from which to function. Due to the trucking industry strike, some ordered
furniture will not arrive until May, but the Weld County Comptroller has provided
enough furniture on loan so that we are not experiencing a hardship.
As of this date, we have not received final approval from LEAA on our budget revision
(see addedum #1) . Indications are that the revision will be approved and the additional
equipment (VTR, pager) , consultation, travel allowance, and supplies (primary computer
software) will be allowed. Further discussion of how these additions fit into the
' project will be covered in Section Two, "Other activities of the project".
Of particular interest to the section is the initiation of the Boulder/Weld Regional
Criminal Justice Information System (BWECJIS) . This computer system with it's numerous
terminals throughout the department will allow for a comprehensive collection of data
relating to a multitude of factors; most notably, inmate data. The department received
its' first terminals in late March. The booking procedures software package will be
implemented first, sometime in late April . This alone will allow us to collect and
analyze data as never before. Data which will be routinely gathered is listed in
addedum #2. Exhibit one is a sample of the Inmate Data Sheet, a form which is to be
filled out on each individual booked into the jail (target starting date: April 13,
1979) . This form in combination with information gathered on the Custody I and II will
give us a beginning data base on all individuals booked. Once the Boulder/Weld Regional
Criminal Justice Information System is fully operational , additional demographic data
collection will become routine. A listing of demographic data which is soon to be
collected via the computer system is shown in exhibit two, addedum #2.
The various psychological , vocational , and other assessment tools to be used in deter-
mining inmates problems and needs are about to be ordered. We believe the tests ordered
eontlinule on pslaincanRidlOaatiomprehensive evalua /ion on every ' dividudl pinpointed for
Signs a Prof ct Dirdyr Sig ,ture of A t ttic "i
Typed Name d Title aptain1 T Name a 7 tl
L. N. Tydings, Jr. - Jail Administrator Don Warden, Finance Director, Weld County
Revised 12/78. All previous editions are obsolete.
Page Two
help. A listing and short description of each test ordered is contained in exhibit
three, addendum #2.
PROJECT OBJECTIVES
In presenting this report on our project objectives the following points
should be kept in mind during review.
a) The objectives listing is that contained in Section 39, "Evaluation Plan,
stated Project Objectives", page 39.A.39 of the grant. This is a slight
deviation from our first quarterly report which referenced the objectives
as listed in the "Project Synopsis Narrative".
We believe this change will give the reviewer a better idea of exactly
how the project is meeting its goals and objectives.
b) Each objective will be quoted first, with a following narration and statis-
tical summary.
c) Raw data will be contained in addendums and will be referenced in the
narration as is appropriate. Raw data charts also contain data.
d) The reviewer should note that several objectives have been modified since
the grant was approved. These modifications have been approved by all
appropriate authorities. To aid the reviewer, the objectives will be quoted
from the modified edition. For the reviewer's convenience the original
objective figures will be listed in parenthesis immediately following the
modified figures.
THE PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES
I. "Establish the Weld County Classification/Referral Project". Although some six
months off schedule, the section is firmly established and operational:" A
difficulty arose early in the project's life in recruiting qualified individuals
for two of the positions, Classification/Intake Supervisor and Classification
Counselor II. Fortunately, these two workers have been hired and are finishing
their orientation at the date of this writing. Resumes of all section staff
are contained in addendum #3, Exhibits 1, 2, 3, and 4.
Office equipment, supplies, tests,reference books, and office space has been
acquired, or is currently being ordered, so that the section can function. A
team management approach utilizing management by objectives, (MBO) has been
established within the Programs Unit (formerly called Support Services Unit) ,
so that a more holistic view of how the Classification/Intake (C/I) fits into
the entire services delivery system can be seen. By utilizing MBO techniques
we have been able to identify several key areas, previously overlooked, which
will enable us to better identify inmates needing help, see addendum 4.
Additionally, this "coming together" of the C/I staff with Work Release and
In-House Counseling staff has helped to cement a sense of cooperation and unity
of direction within the Unit.
Since we are striving to meet the standards as designed by the National Advisory
Commission on Criminal Justice Standards and Goals for Classification of Offenders,
it is relevant to review the project's progress to date in this area. I will
therefore quote each applicable standard or goal , followed by a commentary on
our progress.
A-1. "No offender should be kept in a more secure condition or status than his
potential risk dictates".
Page Three
Each arrestee is placed in B pod, our reception/intake pod unless the arrestee
exhibits violent or abusive behavior while in holding; or is charged with first
degree murder or assault; or .exhibits psychotic behavior; or B pod is filled. If
B pod is filled, the person is placed in another less crowded pod until he has been
fully evaluated (usually 72 hours) . If the crime is serious, or he is violent or
exhibits psychosis, he may be placed in G pod (observation) for more intense evalu-
ation. This whole system is being revamped andwill become moreeffective.
A-2. "No offender should receive more surveillance or "help" than he requires".
In line with number one preceeding, surveillance of an intense nature is only
used in the examples given, or at the request of a counselor based on the possibility
of a suicide attempt. In most cases however,the inmate will remain in his pod and
a "special count" or frequent check initiated. Our philosophy is such that all
programmatic involvement is strictly voluntary. The only exception is crisis
counseling and behavioral contracting for special custody inmates. In other words,
a contract is designed which will allow certain privileges to the special custody
inmate if he exhibits appropriate behavior.
B-1. "The objectives of the system based on a hypothesis for social re-integration of
offenders, detailed methods for achieving the objectives, and a monitoring and
evaluation mechanism to determine whether the objectives are being met".
The whole basis of this program is to give help when wanted and where needed.
Later reports will detail our followup mechanisms to determine effectiveness
concerning referrals.
-2. "The critical variables of the typology to be used".
Our critical variables have not been yet fully developed.
B-3. "Detailed indicators of the components of the classification categories".
Indicators are developed in a very general sense e.g. minimum, medium, and
maximum security, with resources availability attached to each. This is an area
we hope to have more fully developed soon.
B-4. "The structure (Committee, Unit, Team, etc. ) and the procedures for balancing the
decisions that must be made in relation to programming, custody, personal security,
and resource allocation".
The project works closely with all jail staff. Each meeting currently involves
at least two project staff members, a watch commander, a correctional officer, and
a nurse. Input is gathered fronother sources, and the final approval for moves is
approved by the Security Chief per recommendation of the project. In summary, we
use a team decision based on all available needs and resources.
C. "The system should provide full coverage of the offender population, clearly
delineated categories, internally consistent groupings, simplicity, and a common
language".
This is obviously, an area needing further development. At each twice weekly
meeting, each individual in jail is considered, so that the whole population is
covered. However, our categories and groupings need to be developed.
Page Four
D. "The system should be consistent with individual dignity and basic concepts of
fairness (based on objective judgments rather than personal prejudices)".
Again, our philosophy is based on objective observations of behavior. The
team approach helps achieve this goal in that one man's subjectivity is balanced
by anothers objectivity.
E. "The system should provide for maximum involvement of the individual in determining
the nature and direction of his own goals, and mechanisms for appealing administra-
tive decisions affecting him".
We have not yet instituted direct personal appearance of the inmates at the
Classification meetings. However, our "Inmate Request/Complaint Form" (Addendum
5) allows inmate input into his own classification. May 1, 1979, is our target
date for having personal inmate involvement at the meetings.
F. "The system should be adequately staffed, and the agency staff should be trained
in its use".
We believe that currently we have sufficient staff. Our training of agency
staff will commence once the project has an operational system finalized. Target
date is next quarter.
G. "The system should be sufficiently objective and quantifiable to facilitate
research, demonstration, model building, intra-system comparisons, and administrative
decision making".
We have initiated a comprehensive data collection system already. With the
addition of our computer capabilities and an SPSS analysis package, we will have
no problem with this goal.
H. "The Correctional Agency should participate in or be receptive to cross-classifica-
tion research toward the development of a classification system that can be used
commonly by all correctional agencies".
This goal is being approached initially by establishing and strenghtening ties
with other facilities within the state. We plan several visits for April - May
1979 to other facilities. We believe the Sheriff's Front Range Association (jails
on the Eastern face of the Colorado Rockies) will also become an organization through
which contacts can be established and cross research established.
In summation, the project is up and running. Some goals are being met, while
others are just beginning to be recognized and strategies designed to address the
problems. I feel confident in our new staff and believe they have the ability to
reach all goals set. We are realistic however, knowing that not every thing can
come at once. Overall , we now have an operational program; certainly not perfected,
but assuredly working, planning, learning and growing.
II. "Classify on an ongoing basis an average daily inmate population of 75".
In reviewing the data one is immediately aware of the increase the Weld County
Jail (WCJ) is experiencing in its Average Daily Population (ADP). Chart #1, Parts
A and B, details how the ADP has changed over the months from October 1978 to April
1979.
PAGE FOUR A
CHART #1, PART A
BOOKING DATA BY MONTH
OCT NOV DEC QUARTERL JAN FEB MAR QUAR- CUMMULATIVE
78 78 78 TOTALS 79 79 79 ER TOTALS
OTALS
# OF BOOKINGS 287 262 276 825 314 319 381 1014. 1839
33%, MAR
% INCREASE OVER 79 over
PREV MONTH & QTR N/A -9% 5% N/A 14% 1% 19% 23% OCT 78
MALES BOOKED-ADUL N/A N/A N/A N/A 258 234 292 784 N/A
FEMALES BOOK-ADUL N/A N/A N/A N/A 34 33 39 106 N/A
MALES BOOKED-JUV N/A N/A N/A N/A 19 50 42 111 N/A
FEMALES BOOK-JUV N/A N/A N/A N/A 3 2 8 13 N/A
AVERAGE DAILY
POP. BY MONTH 76 74 77 75.6 88 87 90 88.3 82
CHART #1, PART B
SUMMARY OF BOOKING DATA BY QUARTER
OLD FACILITY GRANT STARTED Jan 1, 1979 CUMMULATIVE
Feb 77 - Jan 78 Oct 78-Dec 78 Mar 31, 1979 TOTALS, Oct - Mar.
NUMBER OF BOOKINGS 3054 825 1014 1839
% INCREASE OVER
PREVIOUS QUARTER N/A N/A 23% N/A
MALES BOOKED-ADULT N/A N/A 784 N/A
FEMALES BOOKED-ADT N/A N/A 106 N/A
MALES BOOKED-JUV N/A N/A 111 N/A
FEMALES BOOKED-JUV. N/A N/A 13 N/A
AVERAGE DAILY POP 67.7% increase
BY QUARTER 52.67 75.67 88.3 from period r
1/78) over period
od
(1/79 - 3/79)
Page Five
Several conclusions can be drawn from this data, each of which indicates a
problem with overcrowding in, the near future (18-24 months). The first con-
clusion is based on the number of bookings since the new WCJ was opened. In
January 1978, the last month before moving into the new facility, there were
314 bookings. Monthly bookings from February 1978 through February 1979 indi-
cate an increase of 21% over the number of bookings for the same period in
the pervious year. Several reasons are believed to be the cause for this gain;
all not objectively founded, but nevertheless, probable. First, the various
police agencies in Weld County have become more proficient in carrying out their
duties. Secondly, all police agencies within the county are aware of the new
facility and are less hesitant to book an arrestee in than they were when the
WCJ occupied it former overcrowded building. Thirdly, the population of Weld
County is growing, and with that growth runs a parallel increase in the number
of arrests per 1000. This increase does add some problems to the task of
classifying inmates, but these are not.insurmountable. We are currently utilizing
one pod for Intake/Reception (B pod) and when the jail population rises rapidly,
we are forced to place individuals into other pods before the full classification
process is completed.
We hope to have this difficulty remedied once the computer program is designed
and implemented for appropriate movement of inmates within 72 hours of arrival .
A determination may be made of initial pod placement within an additional 24
hours. The present system can contribute to the inconvience of a person being
booked and placedin C pod, for example, only to be shifted then to another, more
appropriate pod several days later. We plan to review the entire pod system soon
to see if a better usage of space is available.
In order to improve the method of initial classification several new forms are
currently being tested. The first, the Inmate Data Sheet, addendum 2, exhibit 1,
is a modification of the VERA System. This not only provides excellent bonding
potential information, but also give the booking officer some indication of problem
areas the, inmate has, such as family ties, education level, employment history,
health (supplemented by a thorough medical screening by nursing staff), and possible
pathologies or habits. This form will be completed on 100% of all arrestees booked
into the WCJ. The second form, The Inmate Assessment Form (IAF), addendum 6, is
completed by the Classification/Intake staff, and will be the major screening
device used. The IAF coupled with NCIC/CCIC reports, Officer Inmate Observation
Report, addendum 7 will be the basis for classifying the individual and determining
needs. Followup testing, as needed, will further refine both classification and
needs assessment.
Identification of services we can provide to an inmate via in-house services is
moving along quite nicely. There are basically four staff members, other than C/I
staff, available to provide in-house counseling and other services. These four
(In-House Counselor II, Work Release Supervisor, Work Release Counselor I, and the
Programs Unit Supervisor) are the basic service providers within the jail . The C/I
staff members also provide individual and group counseling, as their schedules per-
mit. Chart #2 provides an overview of In-House referrals for the Unit. As the C/I
system of referrals develops, this data may be presented in a slightly revised form
on the next quarterly report to reflect the improvement.
PAGE FIVE A
CHART #2
MAJOR REFERRALS PROVIDED BY IN-HOUSE STAFF AND OUTSIDE AGENCIES
REFERRALS TO:
OCT ' NOV DEC QUARTERLY JAN PFEB MAR UARTERLYI CUMMULATIVE
IN-HOUSE PROGRAMS r 1978 1978 1978 TOTALS 1979 1979 1979 'TOTALS TOTALS: OCT
t78 - MAR' 79
1. IND INTERPER COUN 20 20 15 55 14 11 9 34 1 89
2. GRP INTERPER COUN 0 5 6 11 11 0 5 16 27
1
3. PRE-RELEASE PLAN. 0 0 0 0 1 6 2 9 9
r
PRE-STATE CORRECT.
4. INSTITUTION COUN. 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1
5. VOCATIONAL COUN. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 4.
6. CRISIS COUNSELING 1 5 2 8 6 3 2 11 19
7. FAMILY COUNSELING 0 1 0 1 5 0 2 7 8
TOTAL IN-HOUSE REF. 21 31 23 IIIIIIIIII 37 21 20 78 153
OUTSIDE AGENCIES
////i/////J///t/////////,/////4////A'/////Y////////r////////
1. G.E.D: 8 2 2 12 3 1 1 5 17
_ 1 I
2. A.A. 4 8 7 19 1 2 4 7 26
3. A.R.C. INTAKES 2 5 9 16 1 2 1 4 20
-JAIL GROUP ED. 15 6 10 31 4 6 5 15 I 46
-INDIV. COUNSEL. 0 0 3 3 4 0 0 4 I 7
-DETOX CENTER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
.
-HALFWAY HOUSE 0 0 2 2 0 0 1 1 3
WELD MENTAL `
4. HEALTH CENTER //// '//// '//// '///////// �////////// f//////////////(//////
I i
-PSYCHO. EVAL 2 0 2 4 0 7 0 7 11
(CHART CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE)
PAGE FIVE B
CHART #2, CONTINUED
OUTSIDE AGENCIES DCT NOV DEC QUARTERLY JAN FEB MAR QUARTERLY CUMMULATIVE
(WHHC) 1978 1978 1978 TOTALS 1979 1979 1979 TOTALS TO8TALS:
OCT
9
-INDIVIDUAL COUNS 5
THERAPY - IN JAIL 0 2 0 2 0 1 2 3
-DRUG GROUP - IN
JAIL, NEW HORIZON ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
-SEXUAL DYSFUNC-
TION PROGRAM, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
OUT PATIENT
-FAMILY THERAPY, 0
IN JAIL & OUT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
NARCOTICS
5. ANONYMOUS 0 0 0 0 7 2 3 12 12
6. CO.:DIV DIV OE=REHA6: 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
WELD CO. HUMAN
7. RESOURCES DEPT. 1////)/////////////////////////d /////////h/////////-h///////////
—MANPOWER/CETA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
—TRANSPORTATION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
-SUPPLIMENTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FOOD
COLO. RURAL 1
8. LEGAL SERVICES 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
WELD INFORMA-
9. 7
TION & REFERRAL 0 3 0 3 3 0 1 4
COLORADO DIV.
10. EMPLOYMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SERVICES
11. OTHER SERVICES 0 0 0 0 2 3 4 9 9
TOTAL OUTSIDE
AGENCY REFERRALS 31 27 35 93 25 24 26 75 168
******TOTAL REFERRALS 52 58 58 168 62 45 46 153 321
Page Six
Services provided by outside agencies are likewise showing an increase. It must
be kept in mind however, that except for court ordered evaluations at the Colorado
State Hospital , virtually all outside agency services are conducted within the
WCJ. We are quite fortunate in having such tremendous community support. All
services (except for those specified in the consultant contract with Weld Community
Mental Health Center) are provided at no cost to the WCJ. Referrals to these
services are also detailed in Chart #2.
A description of these services are as follows:
GED PROGRAM.
The General Equivalency Diploma program is funded and staffed by Aims Community
College. A masters level adult education specialist, Robin Schmidt, visits the
jail Monday through Thursday. She works with an average of five inmates per class
and provides individualized learning experiences. So far five inmates have taken
the GED test, with all five passing. As the data collection on all inmates starts
to provide more information on each individual and people with limited education
are identified, we hope to see the average number of students in GED classes increase.
We already have indications from Aims that they are willing to increase teacher
availability time if the need arises. Chart #3 details the referrals and other
data concerning GED. Since Aims is paying all costs for this program we are saving
approximately $410.00 per month in personnel cost and nearly $50.00 per month in
materials, for a total savings of $460.00.
CHART #3
GED PROGRAM
JAN-MAR APR-JUNE JULY-SEPT YEAR END TOTAL
# of inmates 5
referred
Ave # of inmates
in class for qtr. 7
Total people t
Total # of meetings 7
# taking GED test
while incarcerated 5
# continuing GED
after release 1
# taking GED test
after release 0
ALCOHOLIC ANONYMOUS.
This is a traditional AA group. Basically three volunteers rotate visiting the
jail weekly to conduct AA meetings. On occasion, one of our own officers (a former
alcoholic and active AA member), also leads the group. This is a very active group
with good participation. Our main difficulty, however, will be feedback on inmates'
participation once they are released. Our local AA chapter is rather reluctant to
provide followup data, even to the point of refusing to say whether or not a man is
still in AA. Although we have not given up hope of gaining the valuable data, we may
have to be content with just having the group available within the jail .
Page Seven
CHART #4
ALCOHOLICS ANONYMOUS
JAN-MARCH APR-JUNE JULY-SEPT YEAR END TOTAL
# of inmates referred to AA 7
# of AA meeting for 13
the quarter
Ave # of inmates 17
attending meetings
# of inmates also
involved in ARC Programs
& Drug Programs 6
CHART #5
ALCOHOLIC REHABILITATION CENTER
JAN-MARCH APR-JUNE JULY-SEPT YEAR END TOTAL
# of inmates referred to ARC (cases opened) 4
# of inmates also involved
in AA and Drug Programs 6
# of ARC Individual 13
Counseling Sessions
# of ARC Group Meetings for quarter 11
Ave # of inmates attending
Group Meetings Total people 7
Total # of Meetings
THE ALCOHOLIC REHABILITATION CENTER (ARC) .
Provides a multitude of services to our population. First, detoxification is
provided, either at the ARC facility or at Weld County Hospital , BEFORE the detainee
is booked. We have never referred a person to detox once he has been booked due to
tremendous police cooperation in use of detox facilities. For this reason detox is
not included on the chart. Secondly, our project Counselor I (a former ARC staff
member) has been authorized by ARC to conduct their official intake interview and
completion of forms on those individuals who we want to refer to ARC. This, of course,
saves delay time in getting people into the program. It also saves ARC valuable time,
and as a result, they provide services willingly. Thirdly, an ARC counselor conducts
weekly group sessions. These groups deal with education on alcoholism as well as the
therapeutic issues of changing abusive behavior. Fourth, individual counseling is
provided by ARC counselors as needed. We expect good cooperation in gaining follow-
up data from ARC.
•
WELD COUNTY COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER (WCCMHC) .
Provided drug counseling via the New Horizons program. This is a brand new program
(first session: April 5, 1979) . Although no data is available yet, we are quite
Page Eight
pleased that WCCMHC approached us to institute this program. The program can
handle eight inmates, with great potential for followup upon release. Dan Daily,
the New Horizons Director, also leads a sexual dysfunction group for out patients
at the WCCMHC facility. His involvement in this is greatly appreciated. We
expect good cooperation in gathering post-release followup data. The chart which
follows indicates the type of data we will collect. Bear in mind that since
this program just started, no data is available.
This issue of inmates with special psychiatric problems is a thorny one indeed!
For example, during one week in late January 1979, we had seven diagnosed schizo-
phrenic inmates in our jail at one time. We currently have two inmates who escaped
from Colorado Honor Camp and subsequently took hostages before being captured.
One of these escapees, later was caught attempting to escape from our facility.
We have dealt with these individuals as problems arose, but have not always main-
tained adequate documentation concerning identification of problems and resolutions.
Therefore, the following chart will detail how this documentation will be maintained
and how the problems have been resolved. The column on the left of the chart cate-
gorizes the potential custody problems, while the row at the top lists the possible
resolutions available. There will be some duplication of data presented in this
chart with data presented in other sections of this report. However, I believe
this chart will provide a good overview of how we handle special custody problems.
CHART #6
SPECIAL CUSTODY PROBLEMS *
ACTION TAKEN:
2 m 3 o fl -4 —I '-' O0 fn 0 Zia E w 09
O < • 9 SSN rtm o CD e+ m 'o Oa Sm 9
C m CD O a m t afu 1n O
N In Z Z m fli O fL m -P. m I -P. Z rt (9-
CD I V 7 • P. CU fL 5 < < -S fL o rt CO 9 m
a O In.<< < N PO
C... n h �f_.N N E n d�• fr.
�. fl fl 1 I 8t," o Z W J 'S J �
T a r o .-. O 7 0 o o �• 0 �. - rr <
• f7 3 N to ct W
0 co
IDENTIFIED AS: c-°l g.fr m a
Suicidal 7 7
Violent w/in facility 3 2 2 1
Self mutilation 1
Psychotic-Schizo 2 7 3 2 3
Psychotic-Manic Depres
Psychotic-Hysterical
Extreme passive
Destruct to property 1
Escape potential 1 1 _
Homosex aggressive 1
Court order-separate
other, specif inmate 1
Separation needed due
to enemies in jail 1
Protective custody
Medical problems 2
*The information contained within this chart only represents data for the January
1979 - March 1979 quarter.
Page Nine
II. Objective
"To complete 700 (1000) initial intake screening interviews".
CHART #7
INITIAL INTAKE SCREENING INTERVIEWS (IISI)
\QCT-DEC JAN-MAR CUMM TOT APR-JUNE CUMM TOT JUL-SEPT YEAR END TOT
# of IISI ' s \\ 81 159 240
Ave # of
IISI/month 27 53 40
# of bookings 825 1014 1839
% of bookings 10% 16% 13%
As Chart #7 indicates, we have completed 240 of the 700 projected initial intakes.
It took one Counselor I six months to complete the 240 interviews. Based on a needed
average of 77 interviews per month to complete our objective of 700 interviews, each
counselor in the section must complete a minimum of 26 interviews per month for the
remainder of the year. This should be a relatively easy task, based on the prior
experience that one counselor can average 40 interviews per month. The intake
procedures will of course become more comprehensive with time. The basic Inmate
Assessment Form (addendum #6) will be the core of the interview procedures. This form
will also provide a basic needs assessment, as well as indicating potential for more
in-depth evaluation (psychological , vocational , and educational assessment) .
Our Inmate Data Sheet (addendum #2, exhibit #1) should provide necessary bonding
and demographic data. The third quarter report will contain this information.
III . Objective
"To provide 120 referrals to agencies other than probation, public defender,
and state hospital".
Our support from community agencies has become one of our greatest assets since
beginning the Programs Unit at the Weld County Jail . As pointed out in Objective I,
we currently have four major groups already providing no cost services to our popu-
lation within the jail . We also have excellent cooperation with other agencies who
provide services either on an as needed basis inthe jail, or to inmates on special
releases, or to post release inmates. Chart #2, "Major Referrals and Services Pro-
vided by In-House Staff and Outside Agencies", details who we refer to the most. As
is obvious, there are many blanks due to poor documentation on our part. By next
report, these gaps will be filled in and more complete record provided.
We are presently revising our old case recording system so that the following goals
can be achieved.
A. All cases will be logged and opened by the C/I section, using a standardized
system. In the past, C/I, Work Release, and In-House Counseling, all used
slightly different methods which led to confusion and non standardization.
Page Ten
B. A case flow chart will be established on each clients case. This will
allow for a simplified method of logging all actions concerning a client,
including a record of referrals, contacts, types and numbers of sessions,
etc.
C. Statistical information will be compiled twice monthly on all cases by the
secretary for ease of documentation and reporting.
IV. Objective
"To provide pre-release planning to 75 (100) inmates".
Since our last report, this objective has begun to be met. With the addition
of two more C/I staff members, we can increase our efforts to meet our objectives.
Chart #8 details what we have completed to date, and what our critical areas will
be. Due to difficulties of conducting a "purely" pre-release session with a person,
data appearing in this section may overlay with other areas. For example a session
with an inmate about to be released, in which he is counseled on how to survive
upon release, is referred to Human Resources for food stamps, and then directed to
Colorado Employment Services, will be counted as pre-release planning to one inmate,
as well as two referrals. The referrals will be documented in Chart #2, while the
actual planning session will appear in Chart #8 by category of type of planning.
A description of these categories is as follows.
Category I. Brief planning (10 - 20 minutes) . Basic referral and/or information
on community servies, e.g. address of or referral to Colorado Divi-
sion of Employment.
Category II. Medium length planning (20 - 60 minutes) . Helping client determine
needs and referral made by counselor, or giving client address and
direction to agency. Usually completed in one session or two brief
sessions with the client.
Category III. Lengthy planning (60 - 120 minutes) . As in Category II, but client
requires more intensive help. Counselor may experience difficulty
in helping client determine needs. Due to particular situation,
finding the most appropriate agency may be difficult. If the
client is disabled in some manner good planning may be made problema-
tic. This usually requires two or more lengthy sessions.
Category IV. Intensive planning (120 minutes plus) . As in Category III, but
because of client's unique problems, the counselor must meet with
client more than twice for one hour plus each session. This may
involve enrolling the client in specialized training programs, e.g.
group vocational planning in which the client is taught how to apply
for job, how to complete application, how to conduct an interview,
etc. May also entail including the client' s family in planning.
Page Eleven
CHART #8
PRE-RELEASE PLANNING BY TYPE
OCT-DEC JAN-MAR CUMM TOT APR-JUNE CUMM TOT JUL-SEPT YEAR END
CATEGORY I 0 0 0
CATEGORY II 0 1 1
CATEGORY III 0 2 2
CATEGORY IV 0 6 6
V. Objective
"To provide community referrals to the families of 25 inmates".
CHART #9
REFERRALS OF INMATES' FAMILIES
REFERRED TO: OCT-DEC JAN-MAR CUMM TOT APR-JUN CUMM TOT JUL-SEPT YEAR END TOT
Weld County
Community
Mental Health
Social Sery
Human Resource
Food Stamps
CETA/Manpower/
County
ST. Employ Sery
WIRS
Other County
Agencies
Other State
Agencies
Other Agencies
Private/Public
TOTAL
gencies re- Families //////
err to referred
Page Twelve
This objective is being met quite easily. We have good contact with family
members due to our conscientious staff, both in Programs and Security. By being
available during contact visiting times, our counselors get to know family members
and easily become resource people to the family. Additionally, due to the scarcity
of phone time for inmates, staff frequently contact family members and thus are
able to establish rapport and make referrals when needed. However, we are still
trying to improve our data recording so we can pinpoint and document to whom
referrals are being made. The revised case recording system should alleviate
this problem.
VI. Objective
"Develop a comprehensive data base on all persons".
The three main objectives that we will be concerned with under this section
are:
A) Booked at the Weld County Jail .
B) Help prior to trial at the Weld County Jail .
C) Sentenced to the Weld County Jail .
Booking information at the WCJ is contained in preceding sections. Information
concerning those individuals help prior to trial at the WCJ is sketchy at best at
this point, as is documentation concerning those sentenced to the WCJ. The Jail
Administrator has recently ordered a new means of collection of this type of data
for not only Classifications use but also for other uses in planning for the expected
increased population. We are currently having several people reviewing all previous
bookings and inmate rosters to be able to provide this information on the next
quarterly report.
VII. Objective
"Provide counseling and preparation for 25 inmates who will be transferred to
a state correctional institution from the Weld County Jail".
CHART #10
PRE-STATE CORRECTIONAL COUNSELING
OCT-DEC JAN-MAR CUMM TOT APR-JUN CUMM TOT JUL-SEPT YEAR END
# of inmates for
whom services 0 4 4
have been pro-
vided
As was pointed out in our last quarterly report, this may be one of our most
difficult objectives to meet. Although meeting the objective is probably not im-
possible. One counselor has performed four of these counseling sessions by herself.
With the addition of two more counselors, we should be able to reach this goal based
on the number of people that finally do get sentenced to state correctional institu-
tions. Over the last several months, we have had only four people sentenced and we
did contact those four people to arrange for specific problem resolutions. Another
I-age Thirteen
consideration is that this data does represent information also contained in
other sections. For example, we may provide counseling services to the indi-
vidual inmate concerning his leaving for the state prison and also provide
referral services to his family which of course would appear as data in pre-
ceding sections. Therefore this section is a tally of several different types
of services provided all for the same general goal - pre-state correctional
counseling. Again, a better filing system which is currently in the works
will allow us to further identify exactly what services are being provided to
which particular clients.
VIII. Objective
"Provide counseling for five state inmates returning from state institutions
to Weld County".
This objective has not been met to date. With the addition of our two staffs,
one of the counselors, Cody Wathen the Counselor II, will be assigned the
function of establishing coordination and liaison with the state correctional
agencies as well as the state parole system. This step must be taken before any
counseling or services can be provided to inmates returning to Weld County.
We are considering several ways of dealing with this issue which will be pre-
sented.
A. One method that we have discussed with the parole system is that inmates
prior to their final release date are transferred to the Weld County Jail to
go through a pre-release program. This would consist of entering our Work Release
Program so that they may receive help in finding a job and yet still be under a
measure of supervision. The particular financial aspects of this type of system
need to be worked out by our jail administrator with the state probation and
parole system. Due to the recent election in November which caused a change of
administration (as well as a change in the project director - the former jail
administrator) this whole aspect has been temporarily halted. We hope to con-
tinue work on this process and to be able to report more positive results in
the future.,
B. Another possible solution to this problem is to provide out-patient services
to those state correctional inmates who are returning to Weld County and living in
the community. This would be a supplement to the services provided by the parole
officer currently handling the Weld County area. This system of course would involve
no financial difficulties due to it being strictly on a voluntary basis to any
inmate coming out of the system.
We will examine both possibilities over the next several months to determine
the most constructive way of instituting this program.
IX. Objective
"Establish coordination with state correctional agencies".
As mentioned in objective VIII, Cody Wathen the Counselor II will be responsible
for establishing this liaison function. We are only waiting for Cody and the other
new staff members to complete their orientation periods before starting on this
important function. Although Cody has not started this function to date, we are
working on this aspect through other means. We are very interested in what the
Larimer County Community Corrections Program is doing at this time and therefore
are planning several extensive meetings with their staff to determine the best way
of establishing a firm liaison role.
Page Fourteen
X. Objective
"Improve coordination with local criminal justice and public welfare agencies".
Although a permanent liaison person has not been appointed to complete this
function, we do believe we have a excellent working relationship with most of the
community agencies and criminal justice systems. As our referral sheet shows
and our experiences dictated, most agencies in this community are more than willing
to respond to our needs to help serve our inmate population. Although not
directly on the staff, the Programs Supervisor, Tom Mannweiler, serves on several
Advisory Boards to local agencies. This has helped establish not only a firm
liaison function but has also served as a vehicle for community agency personnel
to find out exactly what the jail staff is doing and how we need to interact with
each other. We have recently started a function with the local Probation Department
which should also increase our influence on the criminal justice system at the local
level. A reporting system has been devised on which pre-sentence reports will be
provided to the Probation Department on all individuals going up for sentencing.
This report (see addendum #8) provides information such as disciplinary action
against the inmate, his involvement in such programs as the GED program, AA, etc.
as well as an individual counseling report. This system is being coordinated by
the secretary of the section with coordinative efforts handled through the Fugitive
and Transportation Section which is responsible for providing data concerning inmates
going up for sentencing in other court related functions.
XI. Objective
"Develop material both qualitative and quantitative of the effect of the referral
process on other agencies".
We are currently reviewing several methods of completing this particular function.
Most of our experiences with other agencies have shown that followup information
on clients is extremely difficult to collect. We are currently reviewing the pro-
cedures which the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation uses to determine the
effectiveness of referral . No data has of yet been collected on this function but
we hope that by the next quarterly report, we will be able to report at least that
we have a procedure initiated for collecting this type of data. We are also
considering a random sampling of those inmates who have been referred by contacting
them via telephone or a mail out survey. Hopefully, by gathering data from both
the recipients of the services and the agency providing the services, we will be
able to develop a comprehensive picture of our effectiveness concerning referrals.
EFFECTIVENESS MEASURES
With our entire staff now on board we are constantly working on how to become
more effective and how to measure our effectiveness. In the grant, there are
basically four major sections which will be looked at in terms of measuring our
effectiveness. Each effectiveness measure will be quoted and discussed in this
section.
A. "Develop a data base to substantiate the use of referrals by a community
program".
We are basically looking at three sub-sections under this topic which will help
us reach this goal . The first is to determine if the cost of treatment by a
community resource referral project is more than in-house treatment programs. This
of course will take a great deal of cooperation with other agencies to determine
not only if the client stayed involved with the outside agency and referral , but
also a complete breakdown of what services were provided with a cost analysis of
Page Fifteen
those services. This can than be compared with the projected costs of providing
like services within the facility itself.
We will also attempt to determine by followup the number of referrals from
the WCJ successfully completing the programs to which they were referred. This
as mentioned in objective XI will take the form of some type of survey and close
coordination with the various agencies to determine the outcome. With two of
these agencies, the Alcoholic Recovery Center and the Weld County Community
Mental Health, this will be a relatively easy process to complete. With other
major referral agencies such as the Alcoholics Anonymous Group, the problem
will become much more complex due to the extreme sense of confidentiality that
A.A. provides. However, as mentioned we are considering a mail out or telephone
call survey at various points throughout the project life to determine successful
completion of the various programs.
The third major sub-section under this area is to determine by followup through
CCIC and NCIC the number of persons not rearrested or being sought by the police
after completion of pre-release services. We believe that this type of followup
survey should be completed at the end of the year. It is felt that until an
inmate has been on the streets for at least one year the data we receive would
not be valid. We therefore will develop a computer program which will automatically
search through CCIC and NCIC reports at particular critical points after a person
is release. This particular aspect of course will take several years to really
develop substantial data which is reliable and valid.
B. "Determine the frequency of behavior problems on each pod controlling for;
1) individuals of such a disposition to be a constant source of trouble-
making, 2) classification level of the pod".
There are several factors to consider concerning this particular efficiency
measure. One is the need to survey all disciplinary action reports to pinpoint
those inmates who are causing particular problems. The officers in this facility
are very diligent in reporting infractions in writing and therefore we have a
ready record to determine those individuals who are creating problems as well as
to pinpoint locals within the jail which are hot spots.
In terms of classification level of each pod; we are still looking at a level
system specifically outlining those privileges and services available to the pod.
It must be pointed out, that when we had a change of administration many philosoph-
ical issues had to be looked at quite carefully with some being changed and some
remaining, this has resulted in a slow down on several projects including the level
system. As all staff members are now becoming aware of the slightly different
philosophy concerning the administration and the mission of the jail , we are again
looking at a level system and hope to have something finalized by the end of the
year.
C. "Receive subjective inmate feedback on the effectiveness of various in-house
and community resources. The inmates will have constant feedback capability
in the program by interview and questionnaire".
We have developed several methods of measuring this particular aspect. One of
course is the Inmate Request/Complaint form (addendum #5) which are available to
all inmates at all times. This gives us some idea of what are the problem areas
that the jail is experiencing as well as providing a mechanism for request for
various services. We are also in the process of developing a survey which will be
used by two interns provided by the University of Northern Colorado. This survey
will sample 50% of the population from each pod and should be ready for use by
Page Sixteen
the end of April . The results of this survey will appear in the next quarterly
report.
D. "Receive subjective Security staff feedback on the effectiveness of various
in-house and community resources. This will be accomplished as in "C" above" .
There are several methods of gathering this type of data all of which have some
measure of effectiveness and reliability but also a high degree of subjectivity.
One way that we have approached this problem is to make sure that one Programs
staff member is available at shift exchanges. This is a time at which the Watch
Commander can express himself to his staff concerning various problems going on
in the jail . It also is a time that correctional officers can give feedback to
the Programs staff concerning their functions, availability, and effectiveness.
We have taken surveys in the past which have indicated that the greatest need by
Security staff from Programs personnel is the need for human relations training.
We have developed and utilized several training modalities to fulfill this need
during the past three training academies conducted in 1978. We provided an eigh-
teen hour training block in assertiveness training as well as a fourteen hour
block of training in correctional officer survival training which provided the
officers with specific techniques in crisis intervention, mediation, and the
referral process. We are planning a fourth academy for sometime in May or June
to pick up on those new officers who have come on board since June of last year.
We will also try to develop a survey to better measure this need.
PROBLEMS
It is strongly suggested that the reviewer consider the problem areas listed
in the last quarterly narrative report dated January 15, 1979. In that report
there were several problems pointed out which have since been solved. I believe
that one of the major problems was the change of administration of the Sheriff's
Office. This caused a great deal of confusion as does any major change, and it
is felt that at this time the jail is in effect settling down and everybody is
getting used to the new staff. One of the problem areas pointed out number two
concerned the discontinuance of the use of an intake pod. Since the report has
been written we have again turned to the use of this intake pod although we are
avoiding the use of calling it an intake pod. This is at the wishes of the
Sheriff who prefers that we call it anything but an intake pod. However in terms
of this report, I will continue to refer to the pod as used for intake. In terms
of our own internal policy and procedures we will probably call it a reception
pod. I think that the function has remained the same and therefore the change in
name will have little effect on the actual operation. Another area (number 3)
concerned the titling of officers working within the jail . Under the last
administration these people were called correctional officers with the hopes of
developing a professional attitude for people working in jails in that type of
position. The current policy is to call people who work in the jail deputies
thereby giving them the same status as Field personnel . The current Sheriff
wishes that new staff who apply to the Department start working in the jail for
a minimum of six months before they are eligible for transfer to the Field Division.
People who want to continue working in the jail are given that option and therefore
we still can continue to have a professional staff working as correctional officers.
Page Seventeen
The problems referred to in the previous report concerning salary lines has
been worked out and all members of the Classification/Intake section are receiving
same salary for equivalent positions within the jail . Also mentioned in the
previous report were some problems concerning furniture and office space. Since
the report has been written we have come to agreements with the Jail Administrator
and are currently in a very good position concerning office space. We now have
available one office for the secretary which is shared by the Section Supervisor,
an office for the Counselor II which he has by himself, and an office for the
Counselor I which is shared with the Counselor I from the Work Release Program.
We felt that it was important to keep the Counselor I 's together as this would
allow for a good personal working relationship between the two sections. We may
in the future change the office situations slightly so that the Supervisor and
Counselor II share an office by themselves with the secretary having an office
by herself also. We have also negotiated with the Communications Department of
the County so that all sections personnel will soon have a telephone in their
office. This was a problem in the past in that the whole Programs Unit had a
total of three telephones which of course lead to great difficulties when an
office with a phone was being used for counseling. Phones are expected to be
in place by the end of May. All equipment as listed on the original grant
application has been ordered with some items not expected until late May or June
due to the trucking and airline strikes.
Our major problem at this time seems to revolve around the aspect of data
collection. We have taken steps to set up an entirely new system of opening
cases, file control , and documentation of services that are provided. I feel
quite strongly that we have been doing a very good job but we have been lax in
documenting what we have been doing. By the next quarterly report, we will be
able to provide examples and copies of all the forms, cases, and data reporting
systems that are in use.
PROJECT CHANGES
To date the most major change concerning the project has been the grant
revision concerning the monies assigned to specific sections. Although we are
not requesting any additional funds, we will be turning back approximately
$1,754.00 that is unspendable. We have completed some new lines such as a
budget for transportation, a budget for consultation, and an increase in operating
and equipment expenses. The budget revision has been submitted through the LEAA
channels and we hope to receive some response concerning this matter within the
very near future.
OTHER ACTIVITIES
Several other activities have been going on which should enhance the capabilities
of the section. Tom Mannweiler, the Programs Supervisor will attend a National
Institute of Corrections sponsored school on jail trainers during the week of
April 16 through 20, 1979. Mr. Mannweiler as well as Mike Metzger, the Assistant
Jail Administrator, Richard Cole the Supervisor of Support Services and Milton
Banks, the Department Training Coordinator will all become certified jail trainers
at the completion of this training.
Dick Wing, the Supervisor of the Classification/Intake Section will also attend
a school during this same time. This school will be paid for out of Dick's own
pocket and he will be given time off to attend. The school is in Boulder, Colorado
and concerns the subject of Neurolinguistic Programming - a therapuetic approach
with will be useful for evaluation and treatment aspects. We have also submitted
Page Eighteen
a request to the National Institute of Corrections to send Mr. Wing or
Cody Wathen to the NIC school on Classification and Intake to be held some
time in June. We have yet to receive response on this request.
Dick Wing, Cody Wathen, and Tom Mannweiler have also been involved with
providing counseling services to the staff of the Weld County Sheriff's Office.
We are trying to develop a consultative process to be used with the Police
Division in the very near future. Although this will not directly effect the
function of the Classification section, we strongly believe that it will
provide a better relationship between the Jail Division and the Police Division.
We feel that when it comes right down to it, the primary helper in this agency
are the deputies themselves. Therefore we are developing a training package
to deal with stress management, basic psychology, and human relations training.
We feel that this will allow the officer to better handle himself in situations
and possibly may decrease the amount of people arrested due to the officers
enhanced capability to handle problems such as family disputes, suicides, and
alcoholics.
Another activity which will effect the section both directly and indirectly
is the start up of the computer system within the Weld County Sheriff's Office.
As mentioned in previous sections, the system now has one terminal operational
within the facility. David Holms, a Sergeant assigned to coordinate this
activity is currently devising several software programs to be used for the Jail
Division. Of course the first system to go on line will be the booking proce-
dures which has already been devised by the Boulder County Sheriff's Office.
This system will provide a tremendous amount of data that has been previously
uncollectable or collectable only at a high cost. This will provide a tremendous
amount of information concerning our operations in the future. As an indirect
benefit, it will allow for secure storage of data concerning clients which will
only be accessible by Programs staff. This we believe will help us to become
more efficient in the collection and storage of information which is necessary
for evaluation and reporting.
Another activity that is just in the embryonic stage at this point is the
possibility of developing a Community Corrections Program in Weld County. As
our booking information shows we are experiencing a tremendous rate of growth
which will soon mean the jail will be overcrowded. We expect that we will reach
the overcrowded stage sometime in May or June of this year and therefore are
looking at ways of alleviating the problem. The aspect of Community Corrections
within this county has been considered sometime in 1977 but for reasons unknown
to this writer, were stopped. It is believed that because a new jail was being
constructed the whole aspect of Community Corrections was pocketed. We are
therefore trying to collect statistics to show the need for a Community Correc-
tions Program which would not only provide for work release but also a half
way house setting which could theoretically help us provide services to pre-
releasees, inmates returning from state correctional institutions as well as
relieving the overcrowded conditions. I will report on the progress concerning
this plan in future reports.
*asp_ derf.404.4,14-- CPCC;s14C(ir
Signature Signature 'gnature
Tom Mannweiler, M.A. L. N. Tydings, Jr. , Captain Donald Warden
Supervisor, Programs Unit Jail Adminstrator Finance Director
Project Director Authorizing Official/
Designee
Cuhnrantee: Weld County Sheriff's Office, Project # 78-10C-(1)-C2-119 April 15, 1979
J1F1'-`; i ibP ItEV110N OF GP/ T
OVEPVI C'W
Although we are well into the fiscal year of the grant and have been fulfilling
objectives, we have had some difficulty in recruiting qualified applicants for the
Supervisor and Correctional Classification Counselor II (CCCII) positions. A
Supervisor has been hired and started on March 14, 1979. Several person have been
interviewed for the CCC II position and one was hired and started working on March
19, 1979. As a result of employees not being on board immediately when funds were
received, we had a total surplus of $13,461.00 for the first year of the grant. The
following line item breakdown will explain exactly how this surplus will be utilized.
A. PERSONNEL
As a result of not having a full staff on board, we have a surpluss of $13,461.00.
Therefore a requested first year budget for this line of $40,143.00 is being submitted.
The surplus will be used in other lines as is explained in the following sections.
B. SUPPLIES AND OPERATING EXPENSES
The new requested budget for this line now $6,666.00. A breakdown of this line is
as follows.
1. Items as listed on page 28, 3-4 will remain unchanged at $1,911.35.
2. Computer software and program time, budgeted at $750.00 will be increased to
$3,750.00, due to Weld County's decision not to purchase a SPSS computer
analysis program at this time. However, negotiations are being conducted with
other agencies within the County government to determine if a jointly purchased
program such as the-SPSS is still possible for this year and if so, the additional
$3,000.00 will sufficiently cover our share of the initial purchase price plus
allow for computer time analysis and scoring of MMPI test and data analysis.
If the other county agencies are unable to share costs with us, we will consider
purchasing time on the University of Northern Colorado's computer utilizing their
SPSS package. In either case, funds not used for programming will be turned in.
3. Purchase of MMPI tests and other evaluative tools, plus a modest supply of
reference materials will add an additional $1,005.00 to this line.
4. A maintenance agreement covering the proposed video taping equipment will cost
$41.67 for five months, or a total of $208.00.
C. TRAVEL
The ability to visit other successful classification sections throughout the country
is a valuable way to learn how to improve our own section. As the Santa Roasa, California
PAGE TWENTY
NIqo Twn
Oetrnition Center is being used as a model for our program, a visit to the institution
will prove helpful . Other classification sections, such as in Sackson County, Missouri ,
can also provide valuable information to us. Additionally conferences and workshops
held in the region can also provide needed information and sharing of ideas. We are
therefore requesting the following travel funds allocations.
1. Round trip coach air fare for three (1,000 mile radius) for $600.00.
2. Per diem expenses for three for three days at $315.00.
3. Regional one day expenses for workshop registration, conference fees, and meals,
for $200.00.
Total requested for travel : $1,115.00.
D. EQUIPMENT
Inflation has caused an increase in prices of most items on the line. As an example,
a Sperry-Remington SR 101 typewriter that was budgeted at $750.00 now sells for $810.00.
Line increases have been experienced for transcribers and recorders, and office furniture
to a lesser degree. Additional , a pager, although not originally budgeted will ease the
problem of reaching staff after hours for emergencies. A total increase of $586.00 will
allow for the purchase of a pager at $200.00 and a desk calculator plus slide rule calcu-
-^ lator at $130.00. This equipment will help us control grant expenditures in an accurate
manner, as well as performing day to day calculations concerning test scores, inmate
demographic data, and other mathematical functions. The balance of the $586.00 figure
($265.00) will cover the inflated prices on furniture and other equipment over last year's
prices.
The remaining $3,750.00 (estimate) will be used to purchase a video tape recorder/play-
back kit. This equipment will be used for the following purposes.
A. Inmate Orientation - All inmates upon being placed in the intake/reception pod
will be shown a tape module explaining rules and regulations, privileges available,
social services and how to avail themselves of the services, and a section on the
criminal justice system, (made in cooperation with the Public Defender's Office) .
B. Officer Orientation - Each officer will be able to view a module on the booking
and classification process. This module will help officer become aware of their
responsibilities in terms of behavioral observations so that the Classification/
Intake Section can better pinpoint those inmates needing special observations,
security and care.
C. Ongoing Training - As changes are made inthe processing of inmates, new tape
} modules can be designed to update all staff to these changes. Additionally,
continual in-service training on the skills of human relations will better enable
officers and other staff to deal with inmates more effectively. Most of these
-, , PAGE TWENTY-ONE
training tape:, will be made in-house. However, through the University of
horthern Colorado, premade tapes covering a diversity of topics are available for
our use at little or no cost.
The black and white equipment desired consists of the following:
1. One video cassette record/playback unit.
2. One camera with zoom lens capable of low light recording.
3. One 15" television monitor.
4. One auxiliary microphone with stand.
5. One equipment table.
6. One auxiliary light with stand.
7. One camera tripod.
8. One audio mixer (two inputs).
9. Ten, one hour cassette tapes.
In summary, a total increase of $4,636.00 will raise the equipment line items total
to $7,312.00, covering the purchase of a pager, adding machine, slide rule calculator,
and video taping equipment.
E. CONSULTANTS
1. An unexpected problem has arisen because of the Sheriff's Department lack of a
licensed psychologist on staff. As a result of this lack we will be unable to purchase
tests such as the MMPI and intelligence tests. We are therefore proposing the use of
consultative services offered by Weld County Mental Health Center at the cost of $16.87
per hour for ten hours per month. Based on a use of six months (April-September), this
will cost $1,012.20. Consultative services will also cover client staffing, training
and diagnosis review. (See attached addedum from Mental Health).
2. The additional $1,012.00 will be used to secure consultative services from other
agencies, such as the Counseling Psychology program at the University of Northern Colorado;
data processing and programing consulting as appropriate and other resources. Basic
Department of Criminial Justice guidelines for consultants will be adhered to in contract-
ing for all consultants.
F. SUMMARY
A total of $13,461.00 existed as surplus. Of this amount, $3,932.00 will be used
to increase Supplies and Operating Expenses. $1,115.00 will be added to the Travel line,
while $4,636.00 will be added to the Equipment budget, and $2,024.00 added to the Consul-
tants budget line. Therefore, $1,754.00 will be turned back out of the initial surplus
of $13,461.00. .
LEWIS N. T INGS, J . , CAPTAIN
GRANT ADMINISTRATOR
it.r folio;,;ng ❑.,rralive it in response to sub-grant narrative report corm 7k ,oh-
section 3C, Project Changes.
Minor changes are being made in the project objectives of the Grant at this time.
As stated on project objectives in the initial grant under point two, we were to,
"complete 1,200 initial intake interviews". After working on this project for several
months we feel that 1,200 initial intake interviews is beyond the scope of this grant.
The amount of people needing help is not approaching that number. We therefore want
to lower the amount of initial intake interviews to 700. Secondly, under item 4 of
project objectives, we were to provide, "prerelease planning to 100 inmates". . Again,
after reviewing the numbers that we have achieved up to date it has become apparent
that 75 prerelease planning sessions would be more in line with what is capable for
this section. Therefore item 4, project objectives should read, "prerelease planning
to 75 inmates".
All other
A /
objectives
for the grant will remain as stated in the initial grant.
v vy
TY
TOM MANNWEILER L. N. INGS, .
SUPERVISOR, PROGRAMS UNIT CAPTAIN, JAIL DIVISION
WELD COUNTY JAIL PROJECT DIRECTOR
•
-- PAGE TWENTY-THREE
Weld Mentz- Health Cc..tei (UMIIC) proposed to offer .3 .,Liu:h of service
per month to Weld County ,; it (WCJ) for the following area ,.
Approximate hours
per month.
1. Staffing training and development - to include 2
providing inservice training to jail staff
around basic psychopathology, recognition of and
assessment of mental health needs, emergency. hold
and treat laws, job related stress, etc:
'
2. Case conferences with jail counseling staff around , 4
specific cases, treatment planning, ,-and, clinical
issues. Jail staff are responsible for"obtaining<4.%
release of information.
3. Limited direct therapy services for emergency _` 2
evaluations and medication clini`cs. ,,,'The medication
clinic may require transportation to'"W12C. However,
specific cases may require WMHC staff going to the jail ' . _
- facility.
4. A certified psychologist will be available to provide 2
needed services around WCJ psychological testing re-
quirements. This is sees as appropriate only in cases
where the psychological testing results will be used
for external purposes. Court ordered testing and
attorney requested testing of an inmate would need to
be processed external to this process.
W> C Cost per Hour $27.62
WCJ Fee 16.87
WMEC Write off $10.75
Cost per month (10 hours of service) $165.70
Cost per year (120 hours of service) $2,024.40
- PAGE TWENTY-FOUR
1wer. .;.. Lr of ;.ours of bur vice provided under this contract will not
exceed 123 :.ours by February 1 , 1980.
br•:, C will bill WCJ $16.87 per hour of service provided. The bill
will be sent quarterly. April ' 79, July '79, October, ' 79, January,
' 80.
This contract can be renegotiated at any point by either party.
Sincerely,
r •
Stanley,fR. Eilert,
Director, Adult Outpatient Program
SRE:ls
..J .14 ( . :ill(/(1" A i;JAKl CLA` . ,l1 CAT:3;I C;RAN (JYiirk.FF IJ NIT 1\.E ;
. LL. i ar V� O-y‘Suoe °r (Begins March 12) Doll
i�ir Wind c od'
1149 6894
1 months 1206 1200 -
1 month 8100
Salary .8100.00 .
FICA 496.53
Retirement 430.00
Health 176.96
9,203.49
CounselorII (Begins March 19)
6 months 991 5946
1 month 1040 1040
6986
Salary 6986.00
428.24 f 0
FICA 363. 16 ,
Healthrrent 176.96
P �.
Health
7954. 36
P
Counselor 1
• •
1 month 835 835
5 months 876 4380 •
4 months 898 3592
- - 8807
Salary - - 8807 .00 - -
FICA ' , 539.86 ' -
Retirement 448.42. .
Health 442.40 -
10,237.68 - -
Secretary IV - .
1 794 794 Salary 8375.00
month 833 4165 FICA 513.39
5 months Retirement 422.50
4 months 854 3416 442.40
8375 Health - - 9,753.29
- -ha= A: \ ' r-J.:h
f
?.. i of tom' -.t
r OFFICE OF lin
a Harold L. Andrews, Sheriff
Wilbur B. Ross, Undersheriff
VgigPHONE 13031 356-4000 EY.T. 500
P,O. BD% 755
GREELEY, COLORADO 8053:
COLORADO• March 29, 1979
Mr. Don Warden
Finance Director
Grant Review Board
Weld County
Dear Mr. Warden;
Per the advise of Mike Maag, Criminal Justice Planner for COG, I am
submitting a copy of the proposed revision to the grant. As you can see from an
appraisal of form 13, we will be turning back a total of $1,754.00 of which
$1,579.00 will be returned to the Department of Criminal Justice, and $175.00
to the County. As we discussed in our meeting of March 28, 1979, the surplus
of funds developed due to problems of hiring qualified people for the positions.
By reviewing the narrative for Justification for Revision of Grant, I believe
you will understand how most of this surplus can be utilized to enhance the grant.
If this revision meets with the board's approval , a copy needs to be sent to
Mr. Maag as soon as possible.
Respectfully submitted,
Tom Tom Mannweiler, M.A. L. N. Tydings, Jr.
Programs Supervisor Captain
Project Director
cc: Undersheriff Ross
File (2)
L.-,'. i I PAGF -ALL r1-S_r- ,
I w
>I 0
O -Y
U s-
• 0
F- W
a .0
0
1n Of C
C 0
0 N > W •r •r
I- W V U U C +>
a CD W W W C 10 r U C 11)0 r
W C Ea q E FN- W.0 10Y C +1 0V
a S C W (-) C r•1 ( 5- C W •r C W CO •r r
CO 0 •• L 0 CO 7 7 3 VI L W +1r > 0
_ >- r •r Q .0 +f 0 10 I- VI C O 2
N F- C V) 10 V1+1 = 10 1n C W W•r C
0. r 01 O1tn > 0 >,
4 r-) r- r C r V C W C C to
• 1/k ik -U-1 • Crr VI in C +> •
0 L W 0 r C •r •r +1 W +1 W
0 +> Z 10 •r t 10 C L +> L U .a Vl .C t\ +1 ++ U r b +1 I-
0 S U CC) •r W W V V1 L W in 0 0) 00 W Y •r• W 0 -0 L W
0_ Q NI- 7 10 10 V•r.C •• O W OM W Co 7 U >9 C •• L 10 n1 L L O 7 C
W W 10 0.8- Cf.. +1 2 0 7 0 CS- J i r V1 0 N 0 3 3 •r 10 L 0 +>
O ••' \ U NOo .-•00 F-LI O'C r C 00 QC a 0 3 QQ O C C U0
U Q I- er4
>- in W ONO C' ri NMCtn t0 2 NMft L/1 C•-1 NfMV N •-1NCr)V' Ln SOn03
J W >- La. a Z
a >• ___ • W
0 W R 1 -0 U W r Y in
W O J gn J3 c V1 in
N
V) LLI r.• .• Q W M17 W 7 W
C a
F- 41 J W W E r r
Q C
Z W J. > W L .0 0 O a CC ras
il a rp C u- as Oa E E E
•C aa a 0 L c o W 0)01
Cl 0•-• a K 0 N W >, In
Li- W O O a L CO 0 L 0
.-. ., U U Q a 10 E4-1 10 0
N C W W W 10�"• W W •r
G Li C C M r O >1 LO C >•1 >
W
J 0 WOW 7 tn a.) a
1
U >O r i. o O W r O +>
0 .R 0. C S. 0. C sn I-
a .• .0 C C C (0 V1 1n V a
\ J 0 V- L 10 0 0 L •0 L V O W •• W r LU
N 0 v0 10 .C U +1 10 .C O .. O. W > b r
> 2 >I 4-3 v >, M 0 V a >•1 >r- C F-
U W La CU VIW----r W00 +1 WO.V O N WW
N E W to E W V1 Er 0- >, E E •r J E W r E_ E
r C W•r C W•r 0 E •• 0 V 0)r- CU c-. V•V1 N
W •F- +1 O J +> O J+1 C W 0r MM W L •r F- I-- W us Q +1 +1
0 W 6 L 10.0 a L .rr WS-
W
rF-• • a
CO r I I VI tF >- E 14- 10 W W Y I-- LF- W 0 r +1
F- >- W r CO r O W +1 r H >- W Vt r O L W r i
1�-1 •1--• >- } 7 7 0 W W J C W W •r Y W C Y L +1 J 710
F- U 00LL. <L NN f = C30 OZ via
O la_ C
• N O. C a • a • • a • •
• C•> W W•••1 N Ole in :r4 NM V We-1 NMmt LA W r1N
O C
Q ."--.2 w
U _
W U 0
N •-4 N N N in
W a LL 8.4+ 0 0 0. 0
W Q 0 a 5a to '1"1
Y rr >C W H _
W 0. W C
O Q N N L V V 0
CO V W W
W .fr r
b L W 1-2
*C1
a .Fa (0 0. V •-1
0 • C a X CO 4k
W W tN N tN W W C F'
F- CCCC C L
= Q YYY 10 0 ^ V •'•'• 1-+
Q 03
N I I IL 3 W W v N X
W 10 L V 1
F-- 0. J V O LL F- W C' W
Q y C •r W•r a +1 >-
0 7 1 .C > L L W 10 W a
W •• N •• 0•• U µ- 0 •• 0 W L ++ N
N NF- .C +> a L J W 10 4k
Q N W a +1 0 V 0 >1 +> W0 W +> L
F- W CC W•r •• 0 C r r C• C E > •r W E
Z C 00 3 --sons W••- W W Wr +1 lict
.-1 I 0 0 .w 2 W V1 S- E E E 0 L J r r W W 0
•• 0 QN L F- W L W Y 10 CO C O •••• J 0C9 a
St l Q WO •••1 N V V1 C L tF• W L.L. CD LL W Z--4.3.1). W\W 0
N[C 3 7 r 7 W W C •r O W L W W O J
LA C N F- O s Or O i .C C 0 ti CO W O L 7 > C 1•-• C C 10 N J 0
a a N >- • Z0>- ++ C7 a.C O. 1O+1 Or 0 L CC C 3 C On- 0 F- 0 0 5- •0 Q
✓-• W F- W W 6-4F-r a NU NC OaC L W F-F- L.4. a at a CS2 U
Y J C Z Z N > a 3 •-• W Q m 0
0 _.1 0 0 0 w W 0 > E M
0 r 0 U. 0 0 2 C' C O 1..4 • . • . . . . CO Y r • • • • 0 .
CO 0 C CCU J1••1 NM V LC)toi'- Z to a NMet LC)1/40 411--1 NM 'S LO
PAGE TWENTY-EIGHT
ADDENDUM #2, EXHIBIT #2
PERSONAL ID SEGMENT PAGE 23
MASTER LIST
FIELD DESCRIPTION FIELD ID FIELD LENGTH
ORIGINATING AGENCY ORI 9
BOULDER TRACK NUMBER BTN 9
PERSON INVOLVED STATUS RTY 3 •
NAME NAM 50
ALIASES (ALSO KNOWN AS) AKA 50
DATE OF BIRTH DOB 6
AGE AGE 3
OCCUPATION OCC 22
SKIN TONE SKN 3
RACE RAC 1
SEX SEX 1
HEIGHT HGT 3
WEIGHT WGT 3
HAIR , HAS 3
EYE COLOR EYE 3
SCARS MARKS AND TATTOOS SMT 10
MISCELLANEOUS MIS 50
SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER SOC 9
OPERATORS LICENSE NUMBER OLN 20
OPERATORS LICENSE STATE OLS 2
OPERATORS LICENSE YEAR OLY 2
FINGERPRINT CLASSIFICATION FPC 50
PLACE OF BIRTH PCB 2
PLACE OF BIRTH CITY PBC 18
MARITAL STATUS MAR 3
A_ -n.
PERSONAL ID SEGMENT PAGE 24
' MASTER LIST (CONT.)
FIELD DESCRIPTION FIELD ID FIELD LENGTH
FBI NUMBER FBI 9
STATE ID NUMBER SID 9
MISCELLANEIOUS NUMBER MNU 15
BOOKING OFFICER'S ID
OUT DATE AND TIME
FACILITY STATUS
ARREST STATUS - CATEGORY AND CLASS
HOLDS
SUICIDE RISK (YES/NO)
POD ASSIGNMENT
ROOM ASSIGNMENT
SENTENCED (YES/NO)
INMATE LOCKER NUMBER
LISTING OF PROPERTY OF INMATE
ACADEMIC TRAINING
GENERAL PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
PHYSICAL CONDITION AT INTAKE
MENTAL HEALTH HISTORY
LEGAL HISTORY
ALCOHOL ABUSE
DRUG ABUSE
CASE NUMBER
JURISDICTION
DATE AND TIME OF COURT APPEARANCE
VISITATION DATA
PAGE THIRTY
ADDENDUM #2, EXHIBIT #3
LISTING OF TESTS TO BE ORDERED
TEST TITLE BRIEF DESCRIPTION
1. State - Trait Anxiety inventory
2. I Level Classification system book
3. Firo - B Behavior evaluation
4. C P I Personal inventory
5. C A Q Personal inventory
6. 16PF Personal inventory
7. MMPI Personal inventory
8. OTIS-LENON Mental ability
9. WAIS I•Q•
10. WISC-P I.Q•
11. Rotter Projective techniques
12. Bender-Gestalt Projective techniques
13. CTP Personal inventory
14. MAACL Affective measurement
15. London Procedure Adult learning problems
46. Rokeach Dogmatism Scale Dogmatic attitude measurement
PAGE THIRTY-ONE
ADDENDUM #3, EXHIBIT #1
CURRICULUM VITAL
Richard J. Wing
1140 Pearl St . , Suite 209
Boulder , Colorado 80302
PERSONAL: Age 38, married, four children, excellent health.
SYNOPSIS: I have been trained and educated as a counselor educator
and group psychotherapist. I have specialized in a number
of areas including family counseling, hypnotherapy, psycho-
drama and group -psychotherapy, individual rational-emotive
therapy, alcohol and drug counseling, counselor education,
and bio-feedback training. My practice has included work
in a mental hospital, alcoholism treatment facilities,
private office practice, and consultation/training with
schools, churches and government agencies .
EDUCATION:
Ed.D. studies, Counselor Education and Counseling Psych-
ology,University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming, 1972 .
(Included all course work and comprehensive examinations .
Dissertation not completed. )
M.A. , Secondary Education with specialization in English
Literature, Stanford University, 1967
B.A. , European History and English Literature, University
of Montana, 1964 (with honors. )
INTERNSHIP:
Saint Elizabeths Psychiatric Hospital, Washington D.C. ,
1971-1972. (NIMH training facility for Mental Health
Professionals) Psychodrama and group psychotherapy spe-
cialist training. Direct services delivered to residents
of the hospital; consultation and training provided to
teachers, police academy graduates, and hospital personnel.
EMPLOYMENT.
1/78 -
Present SENIOR CONSULTANT, CONSULTANTS IN HUMAN RELATIONS, a
private practice.- 1140 Pearl St. , Suite 209 , Boulder,
Colorado.
Duties: Provide direct services to clientele; design,
administer, and direct training and consultation services
to orgainizations and agencies; produce and publish pro-
fessional materials.
1973-1978 DIRECTOR, ALPINE COUNSELING. 999 Alpine Ave. Boulder,
Colorado.
Duties: Essentially the same as above.
Reason for changes : Expand available service delivery
potential and exchange co-counseling and back up services
- with a female clinician.
PAGE THIRTY-TWO
1972-1973 PRIVATE PRACTICE (half-tune) . Honolulu, Hawaii . Work
with individuals , famili , and groups including pro-
fessional development for human services personnel .
DRUG AND ALCOHOL ADDICTION CONSULTATION (half-time)
Salvation Army Alcoholism Treatment Facility, Honolulu,
Hawaii . Consultation involved group and individual
therapy and training for program residents in therapeutic
community setting.
Reason for change : Move to Boulder, Colorado with family .
1971-1972 INTERNSHIP (see above)
1969-1971 GRADUATE ASSISTANT COUNSELOR, Counseling and Testing
Center, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming. Involved
working with the full range of concerns presented by Uni-
versity students and faculty.
1967-1969 EDUCATOR, CURRICULUM DESIGN SPECIALIST, University Lab
School, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii. Work
involved designing programs for use in Hawaii Public
School System, testing the programs with the students in
the Lab School, revising, and disseminating the effective
programs.
CONSULTANT SERVICES: (The following is a representative, but not ex-
haustive listing of workshops which have been designed and
delivered. Evaluations are available upon request . )
Denver Juvenile Court; Stress Management Training; Support personnel,
Probation officers, Supervisors . (Project director: Mr.
Tim Fautsko,
Denver Juvenile Court; Interpersonal Relations in Personnel Management;
Supervisory personnel. (Project director: Mr. Tim Fautsko)
Department of Justice (Colorado State Probation Training Project) ;
Action Approaches to Family Counseling (2 years) ; State
adult and juvenile Probation Officers . (Project Director:
Ms. Sue Bashant)
Department of Justice (CSPTP) ; Effective Work With Groups; State
adult and juvenile Probation Officers. (Proj . Dir: Ms.
Sue Bashant) ,
Arapahoe County Probation Dept; Action Group Therapy: A Televised
Training Project; Probation Officers and clientele.
(Project Director: Mr. Frank Minkner CPO)
Boulder Public Schools; Cfeativity in the Classroom: A demonstration
Project; Teachers of Fairview High School (Prinicipal: Mr.
Keith Chambers)
+pc.
First Methodist Church of Boulder; Group Experience for Teens; Method-
ist Youth Fellowship. (Pastor: Rev. Calvin McConnell)
First Baptist Church of Boulder; Creative Marriage; Church couples.
. (Pastor in Charge: Rev. Stephen Jones)
PAGE THIRTY-THREE
Denver Salvation Army Treatment Program; Alcoholism Treatment ;
Residents (Project manager : Director of Treatment)
- SPECIAL PROJECTS :
PSYCHODRAMA AND GROUP PSYCHOTHERAPY : Training and direct services in
this group treatment and interaction theory and practice.
ATTITUDE REPROGRAMMING THROUGH NON-TRANCE STATE HYPNOTHERAPY: Training
and direct services.
•
CREATIVE MARRIAGE: Special marriage enrichment weekends for couples
whose relationships may be in trouble or who simply wish
for greater closeness.
PUBLICATIONS :
"Relaxation and visualization for stress management" A casette tape,
1976 .
"An Experience in Psychodrama" Professional publication for use by
clientele. 1977
•
C I D V H . h'A' Ii E N
2865 15 Av Ct
Greeley CO 80631 ' >; .-' '
(303) 352 2911 . .
'PERSONAL yr -
A native of `iiexa "Cady was born October-1, 1947'2:17'1(e lin; een married seven
years and has }Four• children ages 5, '"3, 1%, and 3'modths` ` s wife, Rita;^ r-.
.
w, a•..w y •
fields a RS at'aatCrmrnoiagy #'rom Long Reach State Univgr : 'rhe asd.e house i ,
wife and mother` 't the nresent time. rR : ..
�s t r �t'�cr x¢ .i,.-:.'4 i1 '*":::,<:-.74'4":"9r4:1;44
Cody and Rita maintain 'an active role at the First United Presbyterian Church,
presently serving as leaders of the young couples organization, helping to in-T-
ate an alternative church service for children (caraway Street) , and serving on
the Christian Education Committee. [' k * '
- r '' - y. ea,tril.. ',a " •,..
in addition, Cody'is becoming involved with the local Chamber of Commer'Ce and
other civic organisations, a k 't` ..,-,v- .. "u
".s"717:g.
' � ' k y,. , inn
'1 .f h is
EUUGATiON"-ate u. ""�r�' '
., _ "+1'x7 <.2, -
Currently in the doctoral psycholcg, counseling program at the Universityal-
Northern Colorado, Cody holds the following graduate's dergraduate dogfer.aa..
PA -- Psychology -- Lin .CI'Sit. of -cxa. , Austin -- 1965-75 -- Austin, TX.
MA -- Couns.e 'nfl1-jCvnservative Rantist Theologica Seminary 1.3775-78
µµtt. ,.. _y.-- Denver., i 0 ,T.`' , - • T.
E C 41 ,.. {
r,XPERIENrE «�
Cody is currently the Pezident of ASLA(:, INC. , and Director of the ,Board of
Trustees of'A'S;f.AN 'UNDTSDN, INC. , both in Greeley, CO..' These corporations ,
offer psycho .o i,aa a.ni'l;,educational services to the Northern Colorado community•
Through the,,X.a nseling r- isions,tody does private marriage and';family counsel-
ing, pre-mart ql,in4 ;:t g, and individual therapy.
~n�5- rum 'E-- -- *4# • •". .".',.4,0-,',,',.'".,
,:.rte 'rr,rr ' : ;'E f ,. '4J r. . d
i z (Continued next gage)
nTT
,.s
Cody's past experience includes:
1977-78 Completed 350 hours pf CPE •internship at Fitzsimmons Army„'Medical
Center ( - 1I —Clinical Pastoral Educat; � ' 7, "h 'i+ y"" " y`"
1978 Youth Services Warkef. (8 months) ; State 4 Coloradb;"i+o ked n !
Ii youth detention :center; '> ontrol and ma tenance_Af put d y A
programe i al :I
`t
1977 Taught Systematic.}Ielping Skills for one "uarter, ConBerira ..,,,,,,,,,,,i.„4:
Baptist fheologsba `Seminary , kyy�"
1971-772- Employee Represents } �9rnIa Hags' ent of � .-14,1,-V4.1-,Y;c = .
"• .. w e z 0.�' d §8f "
•n rt"" ,r Development,i.,)99': •unsel0 ,tlurban planning, lass is
, ;�r 4"§ .
' - . �8e"'y 3 ai`'- d'n'a�a6 't r L :41* • x4` 6 ..1,' the i -iia rt� C 'l ii
,aaddition, Cody has worked as �a li14 gar OrS, �retalt. • F w�,s X t
(4 years) , end served in the 3J6 Nav3C ° .�« k'
"M , Q�'j "h'e �'.;kr S +� 3,c4.,''''1,1,� A. 'Y � ��.r" f
PROFESSIONAL 0{tGAN72ACIONS ,�r � .1 -w ..e.,..k ^r t�=rt r �✓y,Y
Christian Association of Marriage;and c.zly Counsa,3�p s Hobert hTh . fbl `Jay;x„ x't. Christian Association_ 'for Psych « "�'+<a.r dies .pP.m1).1 A +#E �''- ' - '�;
> r �i' -1Y !;, C. $r A.h 3 f $ . ' a, x Sq a' T, r * ' -:1
: h.7 ....a w,., S •.-r?,,¢ -i — u:4
� kw -t �� .r' '"'d of ` .. �„i-
` RSf$AKING ",ENGAGEMENTS : *,l,„_ � : ,, . £ `"" n '�+a,z -' `+w
Cody has- spoken to many various church k and_schoo] plp6 es
tand ebl°lege level) on the :-object :oi uhf i =E 1 d fam1 n 1 �q r �? t I a `
t0 "weight manaE::men;. ,crt in;.rs on the subject =of emotional defenses an•' olrx f ,,E,;;:-...1y.,4
mechani ST... „� r1
i.. `f' "Y.� awr fin
.. :.
4't.s"" �.wR� +eA SF.....a.-w`•+-- i `1x " �
., t ,�.I ,} 1' F `cry i v�1 = -,.
PAGE THIRTY-51X
ADDENDUM #3, EXHIBIT #3
MARIA AMRS1tiE :KETTERLkNG:T
J-l - ' 7,-- . St . Pd.
--Greeley, Colorado
3_p6O'
PRCf .-;:;io;;AL OBJSCTIVP:
To t-.orl, rronle on 'ho career level, rratic11laril" 1n area of Correction"-,
Law :nforcencnt and :;ociel Serticas.
LDUCATIoI:
chool: nr. St-+e i.'niverait
Derren • F. j. J -.ior: -ncioio- (Social Juct.it-a ( io-:)
Graduation Date: Juhe 1975 Availability Date: r2re • +el -.
CGl T_T" CC'NNI 'ITY
Activities: Executive Officer of the Social Justice Club 2 ^ear", ' ember or
the 7e^ertory Dane= Company-M9U, 1'i Tueer C .n't= dr.t -
.,__ . ice Cr- ar.i:?tion: nOS Fir- Sister
;rciel 2nrcrit : Formr Te[;nrr of Delta Gamma Sorcrity
n-^- .,, - tinnr• outride Collet": MCA, i':,U Yar `e Clnb
,Icl,u , e- r Cr.. nisot=ors: Crisis Center, F.illin.-c , on`ara: link T -,
Y ncent'C ..e,rita1 , _llly,...c, T:-nt . l .
Sentar .'.orker, 20 em"-n, j'o•- ta^'s .
•
i T
cc tion Pak :it 'i:h 7chool, Part ^it , Mon'•na
Ara' .'i i_. Cheerleader, 9omoromirm 72naer, Tent-re ro -='r?i+or rf -'i ""1 Thbool
i. •ffs =tad (?,r,z..re+ ) , chorus, Easketball , _ �,-
and VolleT -'_l
Honor : •;alutcto? am , DAP, Mod Ooi Citi"',en T . I , 'knot ociet.y,, ., - !r-.n.-,__
: Alternate Alter - r LC- 3na - irl ' . 'H rate , literary -rd , ^r H _h
• cool ee 'el o ..+e to 7-Marren Tontan3.
mrloror
Cl`- „al 7uraeu of Lend '7 . _ .. ",a-,m2rn of
ri?11 Mort^_.
r. _ e d r1 acerent Hellowstone o„r r,,-..er 1979
'Probation rffice
cillin-s, Yor`_,na
:ayt1iorae/-- _..e ^o-'st ,"--- . (1/'7^ _ r
rr..e_. „, •.'nn.-nna
n.- e .,n: . tv
':o-.c- -r , -ya . - .
, . , . r:r.`_ - - r -
71( _ c :;I .. :1 -7 1/7 - r/7-
--.oz-man, Ment -:nn
lirratch Gallatin County Sheriff 's Dent. `8'/7' - (./77
Bozeman, Montana
;C::A;. ')ATA
Marital E:tatus: P. rried -lth: Excellent
Dennnricnts: None Wei- h: 115
U.3. Citizen: Yes (Naturalized)
Social Security '.io. : 5l6-5S_3616 =firth Date: 'arch 771 1c'
Birthplace: San Jose, Co•_ta Pica
:nhbies and additional interest:: Runnirr, s? iin- and dancin,-; nacrenc.
At/..c'._� :.. is
Cent. Carl .,-i +i, Dr. David Fabianic
,.ell,^ ._-. County . -. :. ff' : r, t . Socio'_n�-y Dent.
F. 0. FO`• 1075 i'entana State University
Bozem-n , ..ont•'nr rang Re--mar, Montana ',0715
-t. la-ter ren Dr. L. W. Ca
lvert
-_ll-ttn .Sount-., E.c.r5ffin Dant . Laurel, Montana 50044
p. C. . 1075
Pnssr-r, :Contana 50715
PAGE TLIRTY-E;.Gr
Prior Counseling Experience
Maria Amable Ketterling
Summer 1971 Volunteer, Pink Lady in St. Vincents Hospital, Billings, Montana.
Emergency Room.
Summers 1971, 1972 Volunteer telephone counselor at Crisis Center, Billings, Montana
Working with telephone callers on various problems; loneliness, marital
problems, parental problems, and referral calls.
1973, 1974 Volunteer, Help Center, Bozeman, Montana
Telephone counseling and walk—in counseling with transients and juveniles.
Training sessions in drug related calls, rape and marital problems.
Referrals to other agencies.
School years from 1971 to 1975— Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana
Interaction and relationships with roommates, associates and others.
Summer 1973 Internship, Yellowstone County Probation Office, Billings, Montana
Small caseload of juvenile girls to counsel - both runaways with family
that were broken. Assisting them to remain in school and acquire goals
for the future and dealing with present.
1974 Research project in Alcoholism related to Crime and Criminals, Montana State
University, Bozeman, Montana.
Attended AA and Alanon Meeting of the Local Chapter, Bozeman, Montana
Aug. 1975 to July, 1977. Dispatcher, Gallatin County Sheriff's Dept., Bozeman, Montana
Varied experiences with law enforcement officers, Court and County officials
and inmates. I worked in the Warrant Division and took offenders to court
as well as served some warrants. Intake of female prisoners and release.
Contact with inmates on casual basis (trustees).
Page 1
February 6, 1978
PAGL TI-:L
AC JDUM # 3, EXHIBIT #4
Resume of Linda Sue Plastery.
PERSONAL:
Born: April 10, 1951
Height: 5' 4°
Weight: 125
Health: Excellent
Marital Status: Married (Maiden Name : Huitt)
No Children
Address: 2850 East 18th St .
Greeley, Colorado 80631
Phone: 353-3380
SCHOOLING:
High School : Graduated 1969 in top 1 /4th of class
Greeley Central , Greeley. Colorado
College :
BA Degree in June 1973
Major: Special Education - Vocational Rehabilitation
Minor: Psychology
MA Degree' in June- 1978
Area: Psychology, Guidance and Counseling
Specialization: Agency Counseling
Continuing attended eworkshops
training sessions to upgrade practical and professional
knowledge.
ACTIVITIES AND HONORS:
High School: Concert Band, Stage Band, Pepclub, Jobs Daughters,
4-H •(held offices and won several honors) , Girls
athletic association, Church group.
College: SPURS (Sophomore Women' s Honorary - Treasurer) ,
Colorado Student Lobby, Associated Students Congress,
University Disciplinary Committee, Legal Consultant
Selection Committee (Chairperson for the summer) ,
Who ' s Who in American Colleges and Universities,
Outstanding Senior Student - 1973 Current: Weld Alcohol and Drug Council (President) , Association
for Research and Enlightment, Member American
Psychological. Association
JOB HISTORY:
Part-time jobs, mostly clerical, during high school and college
to pay for school
June 1973 - August 1973: Teachers Aide with the Colorado
Migrant Council, LaSalle, Colorado.
November 1973 - August 1974: Campus Security Patrolman
with the University of Northern Colorado, Greeley, Co.
October 1974 - June 1977 Senior Counselor at the Alcohol
Recovery Center. Greeley Colorado.
March 1978 - 1978 Intern at the Weld County Sheriff' s
Department Counseling Division, Greeley, Colorado.
PAGE FORTY
Planters Resume
JOB HISTORY : (continued )
June 1978 — Present Security/Counselor at the Weld County
Sheriff' s Department.
JOB GOALS: Working, with people and administrative work are
two focal points of interests. My job (Koala center
around combining these two skill areas into a
workable position.
MANAGEMENT BY OBJE 'VES KEY RESULT AREAS AND INDICPT''RS
ORDER Of PRIORITY
1. Staff Communications
--2. Relationship with Security and Field
3. Program Planning
4. Staff training
5. Assessment
6. Criteria for Pod assignment
7. Policy and procedure
8. Inmate Orientation
9. Data Collection
I. Staff Services
1. Staff Communications
2. Training
3. Relationships with Secrity Division and Field Division
4. Security Awareness
5. Use of Consultants
6. Interns and Volunteers
II. Administration
1. Write Policy and Procedure
2. Programs Planning
3. Data Collection and Use
4. Court Liaison
5. Job Descriptions
6. Standards and Legal Issues
7. Research
8. Personnel Scheduling
9. Public Relations
10. Facility Assessment
11. Grant Writing and Reporting
12. Programs Advosory Committee - Community Support
13. Budget
14. Publications
15. Proposal for STandards Legislation
III. PROGRAMS FOR INMATES
1. Assessment of Individuals when they enter.
2. Criteria for Pod Assignment
3. Inmate Orientation
4. Testing Program
5. Referral Sustem - Internal and External
6. Training
7. Pod Use - Level System
8. Advocacy
9. Interns and Volunteers
PAG`_. FOR Y- nip
I . %1AFF SERVICE
A. Interns and Volunteer'.
1. kecruitment.
2. Screening.
3. Training.
4. Placement.
5. Evaluation of individuals.
6. Job descriptions.
7. Program evaluation.
8. Supervision - scheduling.
B. Training
1. Development of program.
2. Trainer/Coordinator.
3. Evaluation of trainees and of programs.
4. Needs assessment.
5. Selection of trainees (participants) .
C. Use of Consultants
1. Needs assessment.
2. Services availability and assessment.
3. Evaluation of services.
D. Relationships with Security Division and Field Division
1. Needs assessment.
a. Staff interactions with Programs personnel .
b. Questionnaire - expectation, needs, data.
c. Testing.
2. Development of programs for staff.
3. Evaluation.
4. Coordinator/Trainer.
E. Security Awareness
1. Needs assessment.
2. Training for programs unit.
3. Evaluation of training effectiveness.
F. Staff Communications (Programs)
1. Professional and personal relationships - development of:
a. Develope trust.
b. Openness.
c. Honesty.
d. Confrontiveness (ability and opportunity to give and receive).
2. Expanded sharing of responsibility (in work and play) - response & ability.
3. Regular staff meetings.
lwc' PAGE FLi.,..— HPEL
11 . ADI41111 1Pf 110%
A. Programs Plannin-;
1. Needs assessment.
2. Outline existing programs.
a. Evaluation.
3. Community Input (agencies and the public) .
4. Program design.
a. Criteria for inmate participation.
5. Review planning format.
B. Budget
1. Needs for 1980.
2. Control of expenditures.
3. Data collection.
4. Data/Budget report.
5. Reporting format.
6. Proposals.
7. Pay Raise
C. Job Descriptions
1. Review County Job Descriptions.
2. Review Daily Jail Activity Report.
3. Goals as they relate to Job Descriptions.
4. Review job overlap.
5. Write Job Descriptions.
6. Periodic Evaluations of new job descriptions and responsibilities.
7. Personnel evaluations.
D. Standards and Legal Issues::
1. Researd existing standards.
2. Compliance with existing standards.
3. Goals to reach.
E. Proposal for Standards Legislation
1. Review of standards and legal issues.
2. Other agency contact (coordination) .
3. Lobby development.
4. Enactment.
F. Personnel Scheduling
1. Needs assessment.
2. Refer C.
3. Review of alternative scheduling.
4. Write schedule.
5. Evaluation.
G. Research
1. Design
2. Data collection.
3. Interpretation.
4. Reporting.
5. Publication.
6. In House Programs - Experimental
dhoL d .
H. Public Relation
1. Research of pertinent agencies.
2. Evaluation of agencies.
3. Information to be disbursed.
4. Review of services (in/out) .
1. Court Liaison
1. System design to disseminate information. 1. Needs assessment & definition
of tasks.
a. Public Defender 2. Systems evaluation (court and
b. Probation external influences) .
c. District Attorney 3. Channels of communication
d. Attorneys and impact (set, setting,
2. System to retrieve. timing, medium) .
3. Evaluation of both systems. 4. Roles & personality interfaces.
4. Current status of liaison. 5. Development of elements of
general strategy for impacting
J. Grant Writing and Reporting (contingency plan) .
1. Assess needs.
2. Collect Data.
3. Review of funding sources.
4. Establish support: Agency and Public.
5. Write and revise.
K. Data Collection and Use.
1. Computer Training.
2. Form revision.
3. Accumulation of instruments (forms) .
4. Synthesis and consolidation of instrument/form.
5. Accessibility of data.
6. Development of filing system.
L. Publications
1. Sources - how appropriate, with whom.
2. What will be published.
3. Who will write.
4. Purpose.
M. Write Policy and Procedure
1. Review current policy and procedure. 1. Needs assessment.
2. Needs assessment. 2. Format
3. Distribution 3. Review of present policy
a. Publication and ongoing review of pol'
b. Training 4. Congruence interface with
4. Continuous Review security.
a. Source of input
N. Programs Advisory Committee - Community Support
1. Goal identification.
2. Agency and people identification.
3. Organizational format (election of officer, charter, etc. )
4. Elements of influence.
-rho_ ,, , Y-! - c,
PAGE FOUR
0. Facility Assessment.
1. Space, material and equipment inventory.
2. Needs assessments.
3. Reallocation of resources.
4. Expanded acquisition of resources.
III . PROGRAMS FOR INMATES
A. Assessment of Individuals when they enter. Initial Data Collection.
Intake Assessment.
1. Demographic data.
2. Reasons for use:
a. Needs of the individual
b. Needs of the institution
3. Creation, selection, and evaluation of appropriate instrument.
B. Testing Program
1. Needs assessment.
2. Appropriate testing instrument.
a. Classification.
b. Needs of individuals (treatment) .
3. Research and Publication Applications.
4. Legal issues. Re: Testing data.
5. Feedback to Courts (cf. Admin. II, I. )
C. Interns and Volunteers
1. Program needs/Security needs.
2. Recruitment
3. Screening
4. Placement
5. Supervision
6. Evaluation
7. Training
8. Reenforcement for excellence.
D. Referral System - Internal and External
1. Identify programs availability.
2. Utilization of test data and Intake data.
3. Flow system (With clearinghouse).
4. Regular evaluation and feedback.
5. Staffing.
E. Criteria for Pod Assignment
1. Review available systems.
2. Review legal requirement.
3. Design and evaluate system.
4. Security input.
F. Pod Use - Level System
1. Privileges available.
PAUL
PAGE f l vl
2. Security input.
3. Development of objectified criteria for movement (advancement) .
a. Disciplinary board, hearing, etc.
4. Training for criteria satisfaction.
G. Advocacy
1. Needs assessment/ definitions.
2. Roles of counselors, inmates, Deputies, interns, volunteers, etc.
3. Evaluation
H. Training
1. Needs assessment.
2. Evaluation of effectiveness.
3. Roles of trainers.
4. Methodologies.
5. Materials.
I. Inmate Orientation
1. Needs assessment.
2. Evaluation.
3. Roles.
4. Materials and methodologies.
.wL w , VD
CL LU c('!:Ni v PAGE FORTY-SEVEN
JAIL DIVISION
INMATE RLQULSTCCUMPLAINT IORM
TO: FROM: POD: DATE:
(STAFF WHO GUIS FORM) ( ATE'S NAME)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PART A- - INMATE REQUEST/COMPLAINT
SIGNATURE OF INMATE:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PART B - ACTION TAKEN P.S' STAFF
(FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY)
SIGNATURE OF STAFF MEMBER TAKING ACTION
(DETACH ALONG THIS LINE)
PART C - WRITTEN RESPONSE TO INMATE
RETURN THIS FORM TO: POD: DATE:
STAFF'S SIGNATURE
(DETACH ALONG THIS LINE)
PART D - RECEIPT FROM STAFF RECEIVING THIS FORM
INMATE: P09: DATE:
-- I ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT THIS DATE OF A REQUEST OR COMPLAINT FROM THE ABOVE NAMED INMATE.
STAFF MEMGL'F S SIGNATURE
tt'CJ-00 J-ADM
3/28/78
non on ' aa
-- ADDENDUM #6 - PAGE FORTY-EIGHT
lkMATE ASSESSMENT FORM
I . LOCATION HISTORY
1. Where born? Raised? Where have you lived since then?
FAMILY HISTORY
1. How many in your family?
2. What place in kids? Relative ages?
3. Tell me about your mother. Your father.
4. How did they get along?
5. How did you get along with them?
6. Did they ever get involved in criminal activity? Alcohol? Drugs? Psy difficulties:
7. Are they living together now?
8. Divorced? Deceased? Your age at that time?
III. SOCIAL HISTORY
1. What was school like for you?
2. What grade did you complete? (What made you quit)?
3. Did you have many or few friends? How about now?
4. What did you do for fun with your friends? How about now?
5. Tell me about one of your friends?
IV. SUBSTANCE USE
1. As a youth did you drink much?
2. As a youth did you use drugs?
3. How much? When? What kind?
4. Did you ever get in any trouble when drinking or under drug influence?
5. How much do you drink now during an average week?
6. Do you use drugs now? How much? What kind? Under what circumstances?
7. For what reasons did you use alcohol or drugs as a youth? Wow about now?
V. MEDICAL HISTORY
1. Have you had any serious injuries or illnessess?
2. Have you had any operations?
VI. PSYCHIATRIC HISTORY
1. Have you ever worked with a therapist? How did that work out?
2. Have you ever had any psy testing previously? When? What?
3. Have you ever considered killing yourself?
4. Have you ever tried to kill yourself? Number of times? When? How?
VII. • PRESENT PSYCHOLOGICAL OUTLOOK
1. What makes you most uptight? Recently have you been a relaxed or uptight
person?
2. What are three strengths of yours? What are three things you would like to see
improved about yourself?
3. Who in the world do you admire (most)? What do you admire about that (those)
person(s)?
4. What is something you believe deeply? What makes you think it is so?
5. What do you want from life?
6. If you were to see yourself coming into this room would you want to get to
know that person? What would be mostinteresting to you about him/her?
7. Any ongoing heterosexual relationships? Occasional? How does that work for you?
PHa= FOR'Y-%.%:
8. Any ongoing homosexual relationships?
9. Is there anything else you would like to tell me about yourself?
-"-tII. DRAW A PERSON/DRAW A FAMILY
1. Tell me about the picture. (or: Describe the family and what they are doing) .
IX. NON VERBAL INDICATORS
X. BEHAVIOR RESPONSE STYLES
XI. CRIMINAL HISTORY
1. How many times were you arrested as a juvenile? At what age were you first
arrested?
2. What were the charges?
3. Of what were you convicted?
4. How many times were you arrested as an adult?
5. What were the charges?
6. Of what where you convicted? Did you serve time? How Much?
7. What are the reasons you commit crimes? I.E. income, addiction, self protection,
gag, thrill .
8. What connection did you have with any victim? What made you choose that one?
9. Had you been drinking or were you on drugs?
10. Did you do this with friends?
11. What happened to cause this last arrest?
XII. CURRENT INFORMATION FOR REFERRAL USE
1. Do you have any immediate health needs.
2. Are you taking any prescription medications now?
3. Were you working when you were arrested? Employer? Boss?
4. Can you continue your job/would you have a job today if you were released?
5. Are you going to school? Where? What hours?
6. Would you like vocational rehabilitation information?
7. Does your family need assistance or help? What kind? Financial
Food Housing
• 8. Who will provide for them whhi ee you are in jail?
9. Would you be interested in family or marriage counseling?
10. What is your current relationship with your wife and family?
11. Do you feel you family is trying to help you at this time? How or why not?
12. Do you need to see a: PD DA PRIVATE ATTORNEY
13. Any religious or spiritual interests? What are they?
14. Any other immediate concerns?
(2)
i\DDLNDUfi -7 - , PAGE FIFTY
urFICER INMATE OBSERVATION REPOR,
DOES INMATE :
0 1 2 Accept constructive guidance?
0 1 2 Fulfill minimum duties and assignments?
0 1 2 Seem to be honest and straight forward?
0 1 2 Participate in activities?
0 1 2 Engage in prohibited sexual activities?
0 1 2 Excessively seek attention?
0 1 2 Demonstrate feelings of inferiority, inadequacy, or general fear?
0 1 2 Respond sharply or curtly?
0 1 2 Avoid verbal temper with staff?
0 1 2 Cooperate with staff?
0 1 2 Try to avoid conflict?
0 1 2 Show good personal hygiene habits, individual and room?
0 1 2 Demonstrate quick or impulsive mood changes?
0 1 2 Show lack of emotional reaction to many things via fixed expression,
unresponsiveness, etc.?
0 1 2 Bully physically, emotionally, in any way?
0 1 2 Tend to have lots of physical complaints?
0 1 2 Seem imaginative?
0 1 2 Seem bright and intelligent?
0 1 2 Show understanding of the feelings and needs of others?
0 1 2 Seem to learn from his mistakes?
r,, 0 - 1 2 Sleep alot, lack energy, listless?
0 1 2 Often act "odd" or "strange"?
0 1 2 Seem shy, self conscious?
0 1 2 Have temper tantrums?
IS INMATE:
0 1 2 Agreeably responsive to directions?
0 1 2 Self determined?
0 1 2 Cooperative with and accepted by fellow inmates?
0 1 2 Assertive and definite in his personal actions and interactions?
0 1 2 Tense, irritable or anxious?
0 1 2 Easily led?
0 1 2 Restless, unable to sit still ?
0 1 2 Often depressed and sad?
* 0 = Seldom or don't know 1 = Occasionally 2 = Usually or often
COMMENTS:
' J iJENDUM
PAGE FIFTY-ONE
DEPORT TO APIRINT OF PROBATION SERVICES
INMATE 'S NAME DATE FORM COMPLETED
. LAST FIRST MI
DATE INMATE ENTERED JAIL BOOKING NUMBER
DATE INMATE RELEASED
PRIMARY CONTACT PERSON, REGARDING
FIRST CLASSIFICATION THIS INMATE:
CLASSIFICATION AT THIS TIME
The following is a summary of the above named inmate's progress and involvement while
incarcerated with the Weld County Jail .
I. Disciplinary Action
A. First Action:
1. Report Summary of Accusation:
2. Action taken by Disciplinary Committee:
3. Change in Classification (if any) :
B. Second Action:
1. Report Summary of Accusation:
2. Action taken by Disciplinary Committee:
3. Change in Classification (if any) :
C. Third Action:
1. Report Summary of Accusation:
2. Action taken by Disciplinary Committee:
(continued)
*, f ' v-- 0
3. Change in Classification ( if any) :
Programs Involvement
A. GED: Involved in GED: Yes No
Description of involvement:
B. Alcoholics Anonymous: Involved in A.A. : Yes No
Number of groups attended
C. Narcotics Anonymous: Involved in N.A. : Yes No
Number of groups attended
D. Pod Adjustment Groups
1. Name of group:
2. Number of sessions attended:
3. Group leader:
4. Comments:
E. Other Programs:
F. Trusty Status:
III. Counseling
The following is a summary of counseling services offered to the inmate involved.
It is only provided with written permission of the inmate and is not intended as
a recommendation for sentencing.
Counselor's Signature
PAGE FIFTY-THREE
IV. Other Factors Not Previously Discussed
Reviewed by:
Date Reviewed: •
ED Copy to Public Defender
Copy to District Attorney
COLORADO DIVISION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE
SUBGRANT FISCAL REPORT
FORM AR
bgrantee Project Number Date
Weld County, Colorado 77-AGE-10C-(1 )-C2-119 4/12/79
Project Title Type of Report Report Sequence
Intake Classification Progress Iy_ I Final I I 2
-Project Duration Report Period
From 8/25/79 To 9/30/79 1/1/79 to 3/31/79
AWARD STATUS Federal Subgrantee Buy-In Other State TOTAL
Match Funds
Award 53,300.00 5,922.00 59,222.00
Cash Received 7,300.00 5,922.00 13,222.00
Balance 46,000.00 -0- 46,000.00
FOR DIVISION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE USE ONLY
I.E. # FY DATE FUND ACTION CODE AGENCY # ABL ORG. UNIT
k85 1001 32 00 1
EXPENDITURES
Expend. Expend-
Begin- DCJ itures Expend- Unpaid
Approved ning of Use This itures Oblig- DCJ
Budget Category Budget ,Quarter AC Quarter-1752 T6_Date ations(1753) Use
Personnel 59,604.00 3,663.50 13100 7,843.82 11 ,507.32 61.
Supplies and Oper. 2,942.00 -0- 13200 1 ,022.9` 1 ;022.95 61
Travel -0- -0- 13300 -0- -0- 61
Equipment 2,676.00 . -0- 13400 -0- -0- 61
Construction -0- -O- 13500
Consultants -0- -0- 61
-Q- -0- r1p36pgon� _n- _0- 61
TOTAL 5 22 ?9996 62
AC AC1771
Federal. Share 53.299.80 3.297 15 2 00 7.980 n9 11,277 24
Match Share % 5_922 2n 366 35 2 100 8s RA 1 _251 n1 62
Buy-In % 23100 b2
Other State
Funds %
TOTAL 100% 59,222.00 3,663.5000000
9996 8,866.77 12,530.27 61
CASH BALANCE
Cash Balance Beginning of Quarter $ 3,636.50
Receipts During Quarter $ 5,922.00
Expenditures During Quarter $ 8,866.77
Cash Balance End of Quarter $ 671 .73
I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief this report is correct and complete
and that all expenditures and unpaid obligations are for the purposes set forth in the
grant award documents.
Jr
1c7e
epor�pare y Phone Project Dir--941:4,1tor S nature
MAIL TWO COPIES OF THIS FORM TO DCJ AND ONE COPY TO YOUR REGIONAL PLANNER BY THE 15TH
DAY OF THE MONTH AFTER THE CALENDAR QUARTER. DUE DATES ARE APRIL 15, JULY 15, OCTOBER 15,
AND JANUARY 15.
*****SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE*****
SIDE BEFORE FILLING OUT FORM
Revised 9/77
COLORALDO EAA OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE
PROJECT CASH REQUEST
FORM 14
Subgrantee Project Number Date
Weld County 77-AGE-10C (1 )-C2-119 4/13/79
Project Title Make Warrant Payable To:
Intake Classification Unit Weld County
Duration Address
From 8/25/78 To 9/30/79 P.O. Box 758
Greeley, Colorado
1. Federal Award $ 53.500 Subgrantee Match $ 5.922
2. Received To Date $ 7.300 Received to Date $ 5.922
3. Requested Not Yet Received $ -0- Subgrantee Balance $ -0-
4. Amount of this Request $ 8,500
5. Total Lines 2, 3, 4 $ 15,800
6. Federal Balance (Line 1
Less Line 5) $ 37,500
7. Estimated Expenditures Month of May $ 8,500
8. Less: Estimated Cash Beginning Month $
9. Total Cash Needs for Month
10. Less: Estimated Cash--Subgrantee Match $
11. Project Income $
12. Other $
13. Total Lines 10, 11, 12 $ -0-
14. Federal Cash Requested (Line 9 Less:Line 13) - $ 8,500
Project Di for 19Ic4
TWO SIGNED COPIES OF THIS FORM SHOULD BE SUBMITTED TO DCJ BY THE 10TH. STATE AGENCIES
MUST ATTACH AN INTERAGENCY VOUCHER: IN THE AMOUNT OF THE REQUEST.
DCJ Approval $
Amount Finance Officer Date
Voucher Number Date
DCJ Denial Reason:
Signature
Hello