The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About790994.tiff RESOLUTION RE: APPROVAL OF THE 1979 ROAD AND BRIDGE PLAN. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Weld County Engineer has presented the 1979 Road and Bridge Plan to the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado. A copy of said Plan is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and WHEREAS, said Board has determined that it would be in the best interests of Weld County to include four miles of low density paving in said Plan. These four miles of low density paving include Weld County Road 69 from Weld County Road 16 South to State Highway 52 ; and from the I-76 overpass at Keenesburg (Weld County Road 18) Northeast one mile to Weld County Road 59 , then one mile North on Weld County Road 59 to Weld County Road 20. It is understood, however, that said paving will be completed only if funds and road and bridge staff time are available, and WHEREAS, the Board deems it advisable and in the best interests of Weld County to approve the 1979 Road and Bridge Plan with the addition of the low density paving as mentioned above. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commis- sioners of Weld County, Colorado that the 1979 Road and Bridge Plan, with the addition of the low density paving aforementioned, be, and hereby is, approved. The above and foregoing Resolution was , on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 10th day of January, A.D. , 1979 . n t. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS\711ATTEST: (;(,H,t,� L LLD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County C erk and Recorder a Cl rk to the B d by O 62 eputy County erk Jf A �L P ED AS TO FORM: County Attorney 790994 - DATE PRESENTED: JANUARY 15 , 1979 f 1979 ROAD AND DRIDGE -BUDGET AND WORK PLAN SUBMITTED T0 : BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS I;!ELD COUNTY) COLORADO .JANUARY 1, 1979 ' AYNE ST SMYTIi_ _ VELD COUNTY EMn, INEER CONTENTS I . ASSUMPTIONS II . APPROACH III . BUDGET A) . EFFECT OF INFLATION B) , 1979 BUDGET OVERVIEW IV. ROAD PLAN A) , ASPHALT VERLAY PROJECTS B) . NEW CONS RUCTION PROJECTS C) . CHIP AND SEAL PROJECTS D) . 1979 Low DENSITY SCHEDULE V. BRIDGE PLAN A) . BUDGET P AN B) . REPLACEM NT SCHEDULE C) . OPTIONS VI . I .G .A. EQUIPM T A) . CONTINUO S REPLACEMENT COST B) . 1979 REP CEMENT SCHEDULE ASSUMPTIONS Road and Bridge planning for 1979 and beyond is based on the following assumptions : A) . That the budget will be limited to a 5% increase each year . B) . Maximum resources will be devoted to maintaining existing roads and bridges , i . e . , new construction will be held to a minimum . C ) . All Road and Bridge expenditures will stay within the approved total budget . D) . No rebuilding of road foundations will be undertaken unless the foundation has failed . E ) . Contracting out Road and Bridge Engineering and Construction projects or portions will be done : ( 1 ) . To augment the capacity of County forces . ( 2 ) . When clearly the more economical choice . F) . Purchase of replacement construction equipment will be consistent with the approved mix of County/Contractor work . G ) . County employees will be required to put in eight ( 8) hours a day at the field jobsite in accordance with the County Commissioners Resolution dated , January 25 , 1978 . rA I . APPROACH The following approaches will be used in planning for 1979 and future years : A ) . The County Engineer will conduct and maintain a thorough quantitative and qualitative inventory of all roads and bridges to be used as a basis for recommended project priorities each year . B ) . The County Engineer will develop and submit for approval a master network of County arterial and connecting roads to be used as a guide in determining the priorities in planning construction , repairs , and maintenance . C ) . The County Engineer will prepare and submit annually to the Commissioners a detailed plan for the coming year for accomplishment of road and bridge projects . He will also submit annually an updated plan for the ensuing four ( 4 ) years , indicating the anticipated annual budget , road and bridge projects , cost estimates , equipment replacement recommendations , and any anticipated state or federally financed projects . D ) . Insofar as possible , estimates of cost and time will be prepared in advance for each project to approval or undertaking . E ) . Laying of aspahlt will be confined , as a general rule , to a radius of 15 miles of the County asphalt plant to minimize the expense and time of hauling . The plant can be moved annually from one zone to another more economically than keeping it in place and hauling long distances . Paving done outside the 15 mile radius will be done by contract . F ) . The County Engineer and the Finance Director will jointly undertake to implement an aggressive equipment management system within the I . G . A . shops with goals of : 1 ) . Complete and accurate inventory of all equipment with equipment history files . 2 ) . Eliminating unneeded equipment . 3 ) . Providing positive cost controls on labor and material usage . 4 ) . Establishment of economic life and replacement analysis schedules for all pieces of equipment . 5 ) . Modernizing cost reporting system . 6 ) . Establishing and enforcing an effective preventive maintenance program for all pieces of equipment . 7 ) . Providing operator training for all new service workers as well as experienced workers who skills need updating and improving . 8 ) . Minimizing the cost of owning , maintaining , and operating County equipment . IS` EFFECT OF lO 7 CONSTRUCTION INFLATION ON ROAD BRIDGE BUDGET rn 7 293,000 g 0 ‘Z,4`� ti 2 aJP~ clo Z 6 — �F w � A RCy is% oI 5 - 4, 936, coo 79 80 81 82- 83 YEAR C * c. 6 H ai ai w Ucdc /"` J w 1+1 M W7 U� CO ¢ O J D' ---QS_ > Q a LL- ¢ op pp O CJ g g CC cr Cl G� Ci Cl 1 r-1 .. " , , �,,� p� �J7 r-i ri cn co�. H C C� 0,' O O C L� C OM O , , , , , , , , , , , , CO r-II - r. C.C3 ri co i- M l.C) 67 CJ O ^�' W r-1 Cl U C` 01 M r-i Ol CO C'� M CJ N r"i CJ M CO -Zr C'•1 W r i r-1 ry > CO LLI � > U O Z H- G;LLI r. Z O al - , , f� -i H N C N Z.`.� OM Cr, r-I C'J M U LL I CD Q CC a:r �� (� C1 01 W C ri M CC�1 C� CO o- Ccli O rG�rO�� C N, C7 ---a„ O C al r, r-I o Vii CJJ Lc; Ci^ cz rn c+ , , , , ri J rO LB ��r4�l r�'l Zr r/l (5i C) Q c l CCOi ri HI C'A C-1 af? Ln ri ^ L CC�'J_ CZ) r'1 ri Lfl CC CT 0) ri H C OJ (V rl (`,I Ll C CT r-I CO w N. (N Ci (NJ ri r- Cl C I---... CD, r' r-i CO Zr r1 C ri P!l J O , , , , , , , , , P`l Sr��i N OrrOii ((r,pp-1 Zr ri O I� nn, lLL,''�� z .--I =Y �J N a� N O COO co M C C I-21 LP W F 0 8 U ).- W ¢r ra JLL _ ¢ . O CC -J III l— ¢ Ca: } F- 10- o! F C z S H CC 0-4 oH -J a V) w f U J a ~ w ¢ CC o `w w 0 > U z - --0 11 ¢. n co U ¢sue a z Cr CE Q 2.LA U i� O ¢ C i a a © ^ X X X 5 Cn ZJ r , V H U U O Y q a an_ ..., � L a u_, i 0 cg cs cg a H Q rl CV ri L.(1 r-1 LP K\ F- G] • I W i U N `/J v °7 rl O cJ r-I r i re-; r-i L 1r q� ci '-I z LLI Y F- _ Q - H LL r ^J (�J N C`JJ N CC`1 N N a_ 17E-: W cc 5 CT g rl wL ` LO O I. CV ^ CV r-i O LC) 2 J v CD U F- Q L ri ^ Mn F� I ri N Hi HI COW Crrn o Ln co } J O W co Li1 LC) LO o oo Ir o Oo CD fl 0 2- CI W F- F- r H J a >- a N w 0< F- L11 O CC (/) CJ J Q O_ W d' r Q J I- E Q Z W O O cc O F O O O U) O O O O O O O U r r-I 1 1/3 �� L.fl CO riri Z . . F- - W a F- CV J - LL v W U (n O F- U LP - F- Z r-1 CJ M (7) W J O U Q O cc Cr) I RJ 1\ L11 O') ar: OO (n F- O F- z O (D d r-i r-H LL A cc r1 M O U in Y cc 0 Lc 0 W O O O z co A co O O a co a a N n a a a co a O ., . t . ., U O a I. Ln d' l0 ri N CO t4 N .-. 0- CO O LCl 0 O O .+ Z Lfl N O Lfl O 0 F- ^ CCVV 1.11 CJ rl LLJ J O A DC :_ 1 A U .� 0 0 0 O O CA 0 - 0 Cr Lal O O O Q r.. O'1 ? N M J 1 CO U' + -. + -• 'I. Q N Lfl CO —Z—Ls U0 r-I M N ' I C �- 0 0 O O O 0_ W >- 0 0 0 O 0 1 - 1 % - ¢ O v -7 N N r-I CO r-I O I L- O _ r-I ~U' N Ln N rH LO um on W .i 0.7 J O F- I LO M MT-1 LC CO VI I I- 0 F- - Ill N Ill W CO LIl CO 5 > O Q E.0 - - D! r-I .-�- __ 1 LL 2 - - I- Vi Cr) n cC L M O 01 N LIl 0 O Lfl r--I 0 N cC - } Lii O O a tO tO ri C/) 0.0 CO CJ C•J Q W Cn W J W J CJ CJ 2 F- W C i L) W >- F— C/) 1.1.1 J W G'.1 Q J O Q J Q C) O I CD CJ O F— ri W Cm) ri V) 7.17 Ca LI- O CV C� Lf _ E Q O - CC L1l Z_ LLJ LL _ Cr) F- U) Q CT O L11 O a ,-. - oa C Ca O CO CJ ri O F- ).979 BRIDGE BUDGET FUNDS TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $792,000. 00 LESS FIXED EXPENSES $ 6,000 . 00 LESS CULVERT EXPENSES EQUIPMENT $ 20,000 . 00 MATERIALS $ 20,000 . 00 LABOR $131,000 . 00 $171,000 . 00 REMAINING FOR BRIDGE DEPARTMENT $615,000. 00 LESS BRIDGE REPAIR EXPENSES (ESTIMATE - 100 REPAIRS) EQUIPMENT $ 22,000 .00 MATERIALS $ 10,000 . 00 LABOR $ 44,000 .00 $ 76,000 . 00 REMAINING FOR BRIDGE REPLACEMENTS $539,000. 00 CAPABILITIES 2 - 4 M',N CREWS ESTIMATED PRODUCTION CAPACITY OF 80 CREW WEEKS/YEAR . FIXED LABOR COST - $117,000 . 00 r� "� ‘ 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 ' Lfl APE gN§ g § § § § § § § § § § g CU r-I-I N M l(0 N 00 LO 00 rLO I N 00 lD d g LLJ t4 b4 b4 to +4 E4 (4 44 44 44 b4 64 +4 44 U I- Q W LU W CC Wt� LW�rr CC IX CC Wt� W IX W W c Q J CO Gl J J J G J �_ O CY CC 'EC. = CC CC J J M CY K O IX 'EX-1 U Of f 0.l W CO U PO PO U U U ca G1 U Ca CO 8 0 a_ >- . 9 d N M -7 M W l�D r-1 CV l �J CCVI -7 CD 7 rri Q Z Y CC Cr O W 3 w Z CD L,i t 7 E u� pZ w 27- 1-1�xN J co M �' M M M M M M M .' M M = z J I LJ U CO LL.I UQ U CO C _ J G. = 0 00 N N h_. LIl -7' -7 M L(l -J' CF . - �' M 9 CI e- a-) V) G' I K N.. J O Gl -. r 8 V) U) V) N U) U) V) CO V) V) LL 4 .J 0 W W W W W W W W W 0 0 0 0 6 p0 R a )- >- )..y.>- y. >-. >- >- Z a Z a U iii CA (I) Q J CC J PO s Z = tJ al Ql (JO p00 W I = caLll GT) W a-1 00 ^ .7' M N LO CV 00 O U N = Q. C E- = O Lu LC.�C�l r� a� C' r� gal r� c\T) a, a1 r.-=5, \rnM ,--I O C.O 000 Ln �' 0000 00 in M .' LC Ll"1 �%ri 0 r-I N M C' LCl CO I\ CO 01 CD r� N M 7 C d OPTION ##1 3 - S.O.S. PROJECTS BY CONTRACT - 91/BA, 17/50A, 27/62B $21_3,000,00 1 - PROJECT BY COUNTY CONTRACT - 58/47A $100,000.00 4-6 PROJECTS BY COUNTY FORCES $226,000.00 TOTAL $539,000.00 DISADVANTAGE: 40% CAPACITY OF COUNTY FORCES ADVANTAGE: RECIEVE $379,000.00 IN FEDERAL FUNDS OPTION /2 3 - S.O.S. PROJECTS BY CONTRACT - 54/13A, 17/50A, 27/62A $213,000.00 8-10 PROJECTS BY COUNTY FORCES $326,000,00 TOTAL $539,000.00 DISADVANTAGE: 58/47A BY COUNTY FORCES 66% CAPACITY OF COUNTY FORCES r ADVANTAGE: RECIEVE $379,000,01 IN FEDERAL FUNDS OPTION 113 (APPROVED) 2 - S.O.S. PROJECTS BY CONTRACT - 54/13A, 17/50A $158,000,00 1 - PROJECT BY COUNTY CONTRACT - 58/47A $100,000.00 14-16 PROJECTS BY COUNTY FORCES $381,000.00 TOTAL $639,000.00 LESS AVAILABLE - $539,000.00 CONTINGENCY $100,000.00 DISADVANTAGE: 75% CAPACITY OF COUNTY FORCES ADVANTAGE: RECIEVE $222,000.00 IN FEDERAL FUNDS IN 1979 RECIEVE $157,070.00 IN FEDERAL FUNDS IN 1980 58/47A COMPLETED BY CONTRACT OPTION #`4 0 S.O.S. PROJECTS $000,000.00 1 - PROJECT (58/47A) BY COUNTY CONTRACT $100,000.00 18-20 PROJECTS BY COUNTY FORCES $439,000.00 TOTAL $539,000.00 DISADVANTAGE: LOSE $2'2,000.00 IN FEDERAL FUNDS 3 - S.O.S. PROJECTS DELAYED ADVANTAGE: 93% CAPACITY OF COUNTY FORCES OPTION 15 3 - S.O.S. PROJECTS BY CONTRACT - 54/13A, 17/50A, 27/62B $213,000.00 1 - PROJECT BY COUNTY CONTRACT - 58/47A $100,000.00 20-22 PROJECTS BY COUNTY FORCES $479,000.00 TOTAL $797,00(0.00 LESS AVAILABLE - $139,000.00 CONTINGENCY $253,003.00 DISADVANTAGE: REDUCE CONTINGENCY FUND ADVANTAGE: RECIEVE $379,000.00 IN FEDERAL FUNDS ALL S.O.S. PROJECTS COMPLETED 58/47A COMPLETED BY CONTRACT 100% CAPACITY OF COUNTY FORCES 1979 EQUIPMENT PROCUREMENT PLAN TIMING PRIORITY ITEM LOST RESOURCF BUY OUTRIGHT 1 3 TRACTORS `150,000. $350,000. NOW 2 3 PICKUPS 15,000. BUDGETED 3 3 SEMI -DUMPS 195,000. 360,000. DEBT FINANCING NOW 4 4 GRADERS 204,534 CONTINGENCY 24 MONTHS CAPITAL OUTLAY IGA ADDITIONAL CASH 5 2 SEMI -DUMPS 130,000. ADDED FUND FEB 6 1 35 T ROLLER 25, 000. BALANCE OF 1979 7 S/P S . F . ROLLER 44, 000* IGA # INCL. TRADE $100,000 , - $200,000. TOTAL 763,534 . ROAD AND BRIDGE e. CONTINUOUS REPLACEMENT COSTS FLEET MILES/ LIFE/ REPLACE/ COST INCL. COST/ YEAR MILE YEAR TRADE YEAR 15 TANDEMS 750,000 250,000 3 47,000 141,000 5 BELLY DUMPS 250,000 250,000 1 59,000 59,000 5 SEMI DUMPS 250,000 250,000 1 42,000 42,000 30 PICKUPS 720,000 60,000 12 3,000 36,000 HOURS/ LIFE YEAR 48 GRADERS 67,200 16,800 4 60,000 240,000 6 FRONT END LOADERS 8,400 16,800 . 5 105,000 52,500 6 DOZERS 8,400 16,800 . 5 130,000 65,000 4 BACKHOES 2,000 4,000 . 5 20,000 10,000 SUPPORT EQUIP (ROLLERS, ASPHALT MACHINERY, CRUSHER, TRAILERS, ETC . ) 200,000 845,000 Hello