The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20160872.tiff CITY Or Planning & Building 130 S. McKinley Avenue Phone: 303-857-6694 EST , a Fort Lupton, CO 80621 Fax: 303.857.0351 www.fortlupton.orq COME PAINT YOUR FUTURE WITH Us March 3, 2016 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN-RECEIPT REQUESTED Weld County Commissioners RECEIVED 1150 O Street MAR 8 7 2016 P.O. Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 WELD COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Re: Fulton Village Annexation Impact Report Dear Weld County Commissioners, Enclosed for your records is a copy of the Annexation Impact Report, supplemental maps, and tax authority information for the Fulton Village Annexation, as required by C. R.S. 31-12-108.5. The Planning Commission hearing for this matter is scheduled for March 8, 2016 at 6:00 PM and the City Council hearing is March 28, 2016 at 7:00 PM . Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions. Sincerely, Alyssa Knutson Planner City of Fort Lupton Enclosures wIJ �C• Grs, nuts) so , ,�Z , 3/7 2016-0872 „3l141o"Qilp 1 Annexation Impact Report FULTON VILLAGE Fort Lupton, Colorado PREPARED FOR: FULTON VILLAGE, LLC 2212 Ridge Rd. Littleton, Colorado 80121 Phone: 303-929-0822 Contact: George Lee george@leecommercialproperty.com PREPARED BY: ) perio Property Consultants, llc 18006 E. Grand Ave. Aurora, CO 80015 Phone (303) 317-3000 Contact: Aaron Thompson Aaron@aperiopc.com December 14, 2015 I Table of Contents A. General Location and Description 1 B. Statement on Community Need 2 C. Proposed Development Plan 2 D. Utility Impacts 3 E. Life Safety Impacts 3 F. Traffic and Roadway Impacts 4 G. School District Impacts 4 H. Geological Hazards 5 I. Water Rights 5 J. Cultural Resource Survey 5 K. Conclusions 5 L. List of References 6 M. Appendices 7 A. General Location and Description General Location The Fulton Village development (the "Project") is proposed at the southeast corner of S. Fulton Ave. and Kahil Street in Fort Lupton, Colorado. The proposed Annexation is for one unplatted parcel (the "Fulton Village" property), a portion of a parcel that was previously annexed in 1980 (the "Lambert" property) and a portion of existing Weld County Right of Way for S. McKinley Ave. totaling 11.884 acres (collectively, the "Property"), situated in the Northeast Quarter of Section 7, Township 1 North, Range 66 West of the 6th P. M., Town of Fort Lupton, County of Weld, and State of Colorado. A graphical map and the associated parcel reports from the Weld County Assessor are contained in the Appendix of this report. k,; t2tit 3 i .is ”i I. ,,, ... I h — i i Fit ss . S-». - Iga;;‘,11 rOilliMiiat ret\ e 'ea.Alj S ti 52 1ST ST Alea ( ItioN . ' s.,t.-! 1 ems_ _1 1 4 i- f- \I. «wilt 5T. I SITE el--- ill - 7 -- j` )11 J I VCR is � !.� I, - 1 M _ f flf r8� r-1 i iftil i i___iv&ilo I 17:\— el". d ebVICINITY MAP SCAl F. 1ti2000' The site is bounded on the north by Kahil St., on the east by S. McKinley Ave., Peaceful Acres Subdivision, and the First Addition to Peaceful Acres Subdivision, on the south by Lone Pine St., and to the west by S. Fulton Ave. The site is vacant and the existing ground cover is primarily native grasses and weeds. The existing soils are comprised of well-graded sand with silt and gravel (SW-SM), in the A Hydrologic Soil Group. A NCRS Soil Resource Report' is included in the application materials for this Annexation proposal which classifies the site soils into the Julesburg/Vona sandy loams and Altvan loam. B. Statement on Community Need The Fort Lupton housing market demonstrates a strong need for additional housing. Vacancies are at approximately 2%, and with less than twenty (20) single-family homes for sale on the market today, the market is tight. Of those available homes for sale, many are more than 30 years old. With the sustained and projected growth of Colorado and specifically the Front Range Denver Metropolitan area, the affordable cost of living, accessibility to major highways and interstates (both 1-25 and 1-76), new housing in Fort Lupton will continue to see increased market demand. Demographics Summary -- Colorado • Colorado was the third-fastest growing state in 2013 (U.S. Census Bureau, 2014) • The Denver-Aurora-Broomfield MSA ranked No. 2 for attracting college-educated workers from 2007-2012 (U.S. Census Bureau, 2014) �_ 1 _ .._ J _ 1._ w� _ 7 t_ ._ t_ L _ _. a_ (Forbes, ^fns Al • Colorado ranks No. 1 for labor prospects s (Forbes, 201'+) • Colorado is the nation's second-most highly educated state for residents (37.8 percent) with a bachelor's degree or higher (U.S. Census Bureau, 2014) Demographics Summary — Fort Lupton 2 • Population: 7,524 • Median Age: 32.0 • 81.7% of population is under 45 • Average Household Income: $58,687 • 56.5% of population is Hispanic • 39. 1 % completed some cnllege nr have a degree • 9. 1% have completed a Bachelor's or higher degree The preceding demographic summaries for both the State of Colorado and the City of Fort Lupton further support the community need for additional housing in Fort Lupton. C. Proposed Development Plan Proposed Land Use The proposed land use will be residential within a Planned Unit Development (PUD) zone district. The proposed development will be a mix of single-family, small-lot single family (often commonly referred to as "patio homes"), and for-rent multifamily units. The Project will also include a park/open space area, with amenities and a regional trail. Density Overall project density is proposed to be approximately 5.8 du/acre. 2 D. Utility Impacts Water Water mains exist at every periphery of the Property. Proposed onsite water mains will connect the existing main in S. Fulton Ave. through the project to the main in S. McKinley Ave. The S. McKinley Ave. main is connected to the existing main in Kahil St.; the existing main in S. Fulton Ave. is connected to the existing main in Lone Pine St., which in turn is connected to the existing main in S. McKinley for a completely looped system surrounding the Property. This system will provide for adequate water supply and fire protection for the Fulton Village development. Water taps for each dwelling unit will be purchased from the Town of Fort Lupton, the terms of which are outlined in the Annexation Agreement (Draft). Sanitary Sewer Sanitary sewer mains also exist in the north, south and west adjoining streets of the Property. The proposed site sewer main will outfall to the north to the 10" sanitary sewer main in Kahil St. The single family lots adjacent to S. Fulton Ave. and Lone Pine St. will be individually serviced to the sanitary sewer main in the respective street. Projected sanitary sewer flows from the Project total 14,660 gal./day as an average daily demand with a peak flow of 51.7 gpm. Storm Sewer An onsite storm sewer system will collect the majority of the generated storm flows for the project. This onsite system will connect to proposed storm sewer improvements in S. Fulton Ave., which will also collect generated street flows. The system will then be constructed west along Lone Pine St. from S. Fulton Ave. to the existing City of Fort Lupton owned detention pond south of the west dead-end of Lone Pine St. The existing pond outfalls via an existing outlet structure and 12" PVC pipe to the drainage ditch adjacent to US Highway 85. The proposed improvements for this Project include increasing the depth and capacity of the existing pond to accommodate the proposed storm sewer outfall from Fulton Village, while maintaining the detention needs for the properties that currently utilize the existing pond. The existing outlet structure and outfall pipe will be re-constructed as part of the Project. Refer to the Preliminary Drainage Plan and Report submitted with the materials for the Sketch Plat application for drainage system details. E. Life Safety Impacts Life Safety Impacts will be minimal. The projected population dwelling within Fulton Village is a total of 237 persons, calculated as follows: 1) Single-Family Units 59 units * 3.0 persons/unit = 177 persons 2) Multi-Family Units 24 units * 2.5 persons/unit ; 60 persons Total 237 persons 3 Of course, this projection is not expected to be entirely new population within or relocating to Fort Lupton. It is anticipated that some percentage of Fulton Village residents will relocate from their existing dwellings within the City. F. Traffic and Roadway Impacts Adequate roadway systems exist to accommodate the Fulton Village development. The Project is flanked on all sides by existing streets: a) S. Fulton Ave. to the west, b) Kahil Street to the north, c) Lone Pine St. to the south, and d) a portion of S. McKinley Ave. to the east. As part of the Fulton Village development, each of these respective streets will require improvement to some degree. S. Fulton Ave., S. McKinley Ave., and Lone Pine St. will each experience widening along with curb, gutter and sidewalk improvements. Curb, gutter and sidewalk improvements will also be constructed on Kahil St. along the Project frontage. Traffic impacts from the project will be minimal, as the total number of projected persons within the Project represent less than 3% of the total population of the City. Further, the additional improvements to +ha ovjctina ctrnnt cyctrm tAll11 greatly accict in aIIn , atina nvictina anal fiit��ra traffir in tha area G. School District Impacts According to the US Census Bureau3, the percentage of school-aged children per home in Weld County is 19.6%. Therefore, the projected number of school-aged children impacting the Weld County RE-8 School District as a result of the Fulton Village development is projected as 237 persons * 19.6% = 46 students. Here again, it is presumed that some percentage of these children are already students in the District, and as such additional capital improvements to the area schools are not anticipated as a result of the Project. Based upon an anticipated valuation of $275,000 per single family home, and an anticipated valuation of $1.5M per building (for a total of $3.0M ), the resulting additional annual capital provided to the school District can be calculated as follows: Single Family Homes: Valuation $275,000 Assessed Value $21,862.50 School District Mill Levy 19.563 mils Projected Annual Tax Revenue (per lot) $427.70 Total Single Family Tax Revenue $24,806.60 Multi-Family Valuation $3,000,000 Assessed Value $238,500 School District Mill Levy 19.563 mils Projected Annual Tax Revenue $4,665.78 4 Therefore, the projected base annual tax revenue provided to the RE-S School District at full build-out (based upon the 2015 mill levy) is $29,742.38. H. Geological Hazards A site specific Preliminary Soil Investigation conducted by Colorado Engineering & Geotechnical Group, Inc. on September 16, 20055 reported no geotechnical or geological hazards on the Property. Likewise, the report generated from the National Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)4 produced no evidence or indication of geological hazards on the Property. I. Water Rights No water rights remain with the subject Property. The Lambert parcel (147-107-100-004) has five (5) existing water taps previously purchased from the City associated with the property. Affidavits concerning the water rights for the Property are contained in the Appendix of this report. J. Cultural Resource Survey A Cultural Resource Survey was conducted on October 6, 2006 by James Enterprises, Inc. The result of this assessment was that no significant historical or cultural resources are impacted by the project. A copy of the Survey is included in the Appendix of this report. K. (Conclusions The proposed Annexation and subsequent development of Fulton Village will be an asset to the City of Fort Lupton. The proposed housing units will help fill the community need for additional housing in the City, while minimizing impacts upon the existing infrastructure systems, and concurrently developing community assets via additional park space and regional trail improvements. 5 L. List of References 1. Metro Denver Economic Development Corporation, Key Demographics, www. metrodenver.org 2. City of Fort Lupton, Demographics Report via Community Profile, www.fortlupton.org 3. U.S. Census Bureau, Demographics for Weld County, Colorado, www.quickfacts.census.gov 4. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Custom Soil Resource Report prepared October 30, 2015. 5. Preliminary Soil Investigation, Colorado Engineering & Geotechnical Group, Inc., September 16, 2005 6. Cultural Resource Survey, James Enterprises, Inc., October 6, 2006 6 M. Appendices 1. Parcel Information Reports and Graphical Map 2. Key Demographics, Metro Denver Economic Development Corporation 3. Demographics, City of Fort Lupton Community Profile 4. U.S. Census Bureau, Demographics for Weld County, Colorado 5. NRCS Custom Soil Resource Report 6. Cultural Resource Survey 7 APPENDIX 1 PARCEL INFORMATION REPORTS AND GRAPHICAL MAP (THE "PROPERTY") 8 • vjjiir 1l/ _ # ' Al 4 ii aid V ri 1 re • 4 v •, 7/ F. „ e , , , . „, , 7 . A itiliWP .. 7 e , / ie. ......,. . .....1,. .. VII , 9 • ;yr /.i%/! liptate w = � �• C�,1��i;o. �lrl!//. tttSJti: / 1.ITP.4 e AM" ) iir f4p, az " r 4, inMil , §i «4A R a ,,,,,.."..ii �////�/ •;tlyS.1 tott 'ozas• ?F i le ` ;•�i ; 11 • 4 so et � t 'FlitilinItVie :-..,-,:„::: tirni Lei .?�Pf�pual 6� �. p�'iy / 4j< t=,Of = „/ �l`v,Ii�,.,,'` ded j i` 1..%i� L 0:. friraini.., ..7„, .- 'Yip�11i+1/11 [+14+t+f . ( n` ��' \ / ► .. uN M. {r`,.- •. '.A �� `'iiiii�� Of��r /��'r• t>��! /1,.1 Y Y11s .- . / I=tUn/rl� • tr.,„ JJilrl r',� t�(S•i•wi F�1/�,Yt I �. jMIV•t / � i 111 { O.L //.• Aer.t,, mo •+r /VI t1 g yl -•.:Viag 11 %,_ a .. R,�/i/�!!�Ifit ":.e:-.(3:7..-1 V!1 t�� b -l'i'rel / • t1d1lSi IRIS � �'•1!a w4. _'.�,... _zit'4 u % 'gar: 1� �'L/J ear, y � ;,� � it. 3 'al ar� � �� !fro Rn I1611 C q� OP ifs t • sr.-:pt. f i l t�7�l r�� L�i/J, ,' ', �� ir ist It • fit• Aet i sill s.' i t• /i r• • ice .» p I_ _ Illk, •'0 WS frith 00 7,1 6 Al rw,t-pti Al unkA., ,to.. . .i.., A,4 ,.__w 111 S ITE . . =t �— A 41$1, 1 I: Nti nifilits V gr illtQ � bKr S 22 1./--I r Of rN24321C-r- 11 >1 t. e' i. fr 44_0, . A. 4 - --:- es Cal 4 • —WCR 10-1 I2— ;_ / isiiile _..! / opi NO / 1 0 pr CR10-i P4 /1 __ _ ,ik rN arVICINITY MAP SCALE: 111=2000' Property Profile for Account # R6189786 January 30, 2015 Account Information Account Parcel Space Account Type Tax Year Tax Area Buildings Actual Value Assessed Value , I R6189786 147107100004 Vacant Land 2015 0882 0 78,750 22,840 Legal FTL 15813-J PT NE4NE4 7 1 66 BEG 672W OF NE COR S269' W486' N269' E486' TO BEG EXC UPRR RES Subdivision Block Lot Land Economic Area SUBDIVISION TRACTS Property Address Property City Zip Section Township Range FORT LUPTON 000000000 07 01 66 Owner Information Account Parcel Space Account Type Tax Year Tax Area Buildings Actual Value Assessed Value R61Q0786 147107100004 kV/wantLand 2015 0882 0 7Q 750 22,840 I I V V I V T I I I V L I V L I V,I V'J Owner(s) Address Line 1 Address Line 2 City ST Zip LAMBERT BARBARA JEAN LAMBERT 155 E BRIDGE ST BRIGHTON CO 806011612 JAMES DONALD Document History Information Account Parcel Space Account Type Tax Year Tax Area Buildings Actual Value Assessed Value R6189786 147107100004 Vacant Land 2015 0882 0 78,750 22,840 Reception Rec Date Type Grantor Grantee Doc Fee Sale Date Sale Price 02060768 07/15/1986 QCN 0.00 01/01/1900 0 Reception Rec Date Type I Grantor Grantee Doc Fee Sale Date Sale Price 2957437 06/03/2002 WDN LAMBERT & SON LAMBERT JAMES 0.00 12/31/2001 0 INC DONALD & BROOKMAN BARBARA 3123110 11/03/2003 QCN BUROUGH LEALLAN LAMBERT JAMES 0.00 10/29/2003 0 L & KAROLYN L DONALD & BROOKMAN BARBARA 3328406 10/04/2005 DEC BROOKMAN LAMBERT BARBARA 0.00 08/19/2005 0 BARBARA JEAN JEAN Building Information Account Parcel Space Account Type Tax Year Tax Area Buildings Actual Value Assessed Value R6189786 147107100004 Vacant Land 2015 0882 0 78,750 22,840 Valuation Information Account Parcel Space Account Type Tax Year Tax Area Buildings Actual Value Assessed Value R6189786 147107100004 Vacant Land 2015 0882 0 78,750 22,840 Type Code Description Actual Value Assessed Acres Land SqFt Value Land 0520 1 AC TO L/T 5 AC 78,750 22,840 3.000 130,680 78,750 22,840 3,000 130,680 Tax Authority Information Account Parcel Space Account Type Tax Year Tax Area Buildings Actual Value Assessed Value R6189786 147107100004 Vacant Land 2015 0882 0 78,750 22,840 Tax Area District ID District Name Current Mill Tax Year Levy 0882 0100 WELD COUNTY 15.800 2015 0882 0208 SCHOOL DIST RE8-FORT LUPTON 19.563 2015 0882 0301 NORTHERN COLORADO WATER (NCW) 1.000 2015 0882 0302 CENTRAL COLORADO WATER (CCW) 1.737 2015 0882 0309 CENTRAL COLORADO WATER SUBDISTRICT (CCS) 1.309 2015 0882 0407 FORT LUPTON CITY 30.274 2015 Tax Area District ID District Name Current `.'il Tax Year Levy 0882 0506 FORT LUPTON FIRE 9.303 2015 0882 0530 FORT LUPTON FIRE (BOND 2022) 1.032 2015 0882 0700 AIMS JUNIOR COLLEGE 6.333 2015 0882 1050 HIGH PLAINS LIBRARY 3267 2015 89.618 I Property Profile for Account # R6189886 January 30, 2015 Account Information Account i Parcel Space Account Type Tax Year Tax Area Buildings Actual Value Assessed Value R6189886 147107100005 Agricultural 2015 2228 0 1,352 390 Legal 15813C PT NE4NE4 7 1 66 BEG 672W & 269'S OF NE COR NE4NE4 S108' W168' S943' W480' N1051' E648' TO BEG EXC UPRR RES Subdivision Block Lot Land Economic Area 4209 FT LUPTON Property Address Property City Zip Section Township Range 07 01 66 Owner Information Account Parcel Space Account Type Tax Year Tax Area Buildings Actual Value Assessed Value R6189886 147107100005 Agricultural 2015 2228 0 1,352 390 Owner(s) Address Line 1 Address Line 2 City ST Zip FULTON 2212 W RIDGE RD LITTLETON CO 801203031 VILLAGE LLC Document History Information Account Parcel Space Account Type Tax Year , Tax Area Buildings Actual Value Assessed Value R6189886 147107100005 Agricultural 2015 2228 0 1,352 390 Reception Rec Date Type Grantor Grantee Doc Fee Sale Date Sale Price 01992985 12/26/1984 PRDN 0.00 01/01/1900 0 3327581 09/30/2005 WD TEDFORD ELEANOR FULTON VILLAGE 32.00 08/25/2005 320,000 G ETAL LLC Building Information Account Parcel Space Account Type Tax Year Tax Area I Buildings Actual Value Assessed Value R6189886 147107100005 Agricultural 2015 2228 0 1 ,352 390 I Valuation Information I. Account Parcel Space Account Type Tax Year Tax Area Buildings Actual Value Assessed Value R6189886 147107100005 Agricultural 2015 2228 0 1,352 390 Type Code Description Actual Value Assessed Acres Land SqFt Value l Land 4127 DRY FARM LAND-AGRICULTURAL 1 ,352 ! 390 I 12.000 522,720 1 ,352 390 12.000 522,720 Tax Authority Information Account Parcel Space Account Type Tax Year Tax Area Buildings Actual Value Assessed Value R6189886 147107100005 Agricultural 2015 2228 0 1,352 390 Tax Area District ID District Name Current Mill Tax Year Levy 2228 0100 WELD COUNTY 15.800 2015 2228 0208 SCHOOL DIST RE8-FORT LUPTON 19.563 2015 2228 0301 NORTHERN COLORADO WATER (NCW) 1.000 2015 2228 0302 CENTRAL COLORADO WATER (CCW) 1.737 2015 2228 0309 CENTRAL COLORADO WATER SUBDISTRICT (CCS) 1.309 2015 2228 0506 FORT LUPTON FIRE 9.303 2015 2228 0530 FORT LUPTON FIRE (BOND 2022) 1.032 2015 2228 0700 AIMS JUNIOR COLLEGE 6.333 2015 2228 1050 HIGH PLAINS LIBRARY 3.267 2015 2228 1201 PLATTE VALLEY CONSERVATION 0.000 2015 59.344 APPENDIX 2 KEY DEMOGRAPHICS, METRO DENVER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 9 Metro Denver Demographics I Metro Denver http://www.metrodenver.org/do-business/demographics/ :) (I)►any%2Cclicked Entityld%3A563638% x%3D 2CidAo1B' s'1Qa6tarIWARIl4 6V 4401e1LI /o3Afblie?hW20Den er )d 0) ilmetrodenveredc/) Overview Demographics G Share (http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php) As a fast-growing region, Metro Denver is a dynamic location where companies can easily attract highly skilled workers and expand their operations. The Metro Denver region had a 1 .5 percent population growth rate between 2004 and 2014 and is consistently ranked as one of the fastest-growing areas in the nation . More impressive facts about Metro Denver and Colorado's demographics: • Colorado was the third-fastest growing state in 2013 (U.S. Census Bureau, 2014) • The Denver-Aurora-Broomfield MSA ranked No. 2 for attracting college-educated workers from 2007-2012 (U.S. Census Bureau, 2014) • Colorado ranks No. 1 for labor prospects (Forbes, 2014) • Colorado is the nation's second-most highly educated state for residents (37.8 percent) with a bachelor's degree or higher (U .S. Census Bureau, 2014) • In addition, Colorado has the nation's lowest obesity rate and in No. 2 for physical activity (Trust for America's Health, 2014; Kaiser State Health Facts, 2014) Key Demographics Metro Denver Northern Colorado Square Miles 4,532 6,646 Population 2013 2,951 ,798 585,371 *Projected 1 of 5 10/30/2015 11 :20 AM Metro Denver Demographics I Metro Denver http://www.metrodenver.org/do-business/demographics/ Metro Denver Northern Colorado Population 2014 3,002,629 597,558 Population 2020* 3,306, 177 686,659 Labor Force 1 ,583,928 309,991 Nonfarm Employment 1 ,466,400 234,300 Average Wage $56,514 $43,332 Median Age 36.6 35.2 *Projected We understand that having the most current and up-to-date information is important to your site selection process. The Metro Denver Economic Development Corporation can provide detailed demographic reports and data analysis that will help expedite your process, and ensure you have all the tools you need to make an informed decision. Metro Denver Monthly Economic Indicators » (http://www. metrodenver.org/research-reports/monthly-economic-indicators/) 2 of 5 10/30/2015 11 :20 AM Metro Denver Demographics I Metro Denver http://www.metrodenver.org/do-business/demographics/ ,.. ,,Airre-e--- .4110 "la f~_' •-ea . _ .4 - - liiitooposted � - - .4 'Zia. - r - u • 4. ,._,,, , 0 1-4,,.... , i .... r r -—1 lit !rnilleittiiii bit il 0 a Mile High Advantage: Expanding our infrastructure in all directions » (http://www.metrodenver.org/m i le-h igh-advantages/infrastructure/) Investors Leadership (http://www.metrodenver.org/investors/leadership/) Investor Database (http://www.metrodenver.org/investors/investor-database/) Benefits & ROI (http://www.metrodenver.org/investors/benefits-roi/) Get Involved (http://www.metrodenver.org/investors/get-involved/) Featured Investor (http://www.metrodenver_org/investors/featured-investor/) 3 of 5 10/30/2015 11 :20 AM Metro Denver Demographics I Metro Denver http://www.metrodenver.org/do-business/demographics/ Research & Reports Monthly Economic Indicators (http://www.metrodenver.org/research-reports/monthly-economic-indicators/) Economic Forecasts (http://www.metrodenver.org/research-reports/economic-forecasts/) Industry Cluster Study (http://www.metrodenver.org/research-reports/industry-cluster-study/) Toward a More Competitive Colorado (http://www.metrodenver.org/research-reports/toward-a-more-competitive-colorado/) Resource Rich Colorado (http://www.metrodenver.org/research-reports/resource-rich-Colorado/) Resources Data Central (http://www.metrodenver.org/resources/data-central/) Industry Database (http://www.metrodenver.org/resources/industry-database/) Metro Denver Jobs (http://www.metrodenver.org/resources/metro-denver-jobs/) News News Center (http://www.metrodenver.org/news/news-center/) Metro Denver in the News (http://www.metrodenver.org/news/metro-denver-in-the-news/) Publications (http://www.metrodenver.org/news/publications/) Events (http://www.metrodenver.org/news/events/) Rankings (http://www.metrodenver.org/news/rankings/) Affiliates Colorado Energy Coalition (/about/affiliates/colorado-energy-coalition/) Colorado Investment Services Coalition (http://www.metrodenver.org/about/affiliates/colorado-investment-services-coalition/) Colorado Space Coalition Vabout/affiliates/colorado-space-coalition/ Metro Denver Aviation Coalition (/about/affiliates/metro-denver-aviation-coaliton/) Connect Twitter (http://twitter.com/MetroDenverEDC) Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/metrodenveredc) Cone of Silence Blog (/blog) YouTube (http://www.youtube.com/user/MetroDenverEDC) Flickr (https://www.flickr.com/photos/metrodenver_edc/sets/) Instagram (http://web.stagram.com/n/metrodenveredc/) Pinterest (http://www.pinterest.com/metrodenveredc/) Linkedin (https://www.linkedin.com/company/563638?trk=tyah& trkinfo=clickedVertical%3Acompany%2CclickedEntityld%3A563638%2Cidx%3A1-1-1%2Ctarld%3A1438980963446%2Ctas%3AMetro%20Denver%20) 4 of 5 10/30/2015 11 :20 AM APPENDIX 3 DEMOGRAPHICS, CITY OF FORT LUPTON COMMUNITY PROFILE 10 Demographics Population, Age & Income 10000 9000 8000 7000 6000 5000 - —' Fort Lupton 4000 Combined 3000 2000 1000 0 1990 2000 2010 2012 Fort Lupton is growing quickly with the addition of many new jobs in the oil and gas industry. Although Fort Lupton has very affordable housing, the market is very tight with only 2% vacant housing units. Our building has lagged behind the job growth, but we are now starting to have new apartments, housing and hotel permits being pulled weekly. The population within the city limits is currently over 7,500 residents. Adjacent nearby housing, just outside of the Fort Lupton city limits, brings the population to over 9,000. In the census period from 2000 to 2010, the population in Fort Lupton jumped by 29.2%. The number of households in Fort Lupton jumped by 23.2%, and the big jump in growth is just starting with spec homes being sold before they are completed. The 2010 census average household income is over $51 ,009, with a median age of 28.8. Our average household size is 3.23 and 67.4% of the homes are owner occupied. Summary for the 2010 census for Fort Lupton': • Population: 7,524 • Median Age: 32.0 • 81 .7% of population is under 45 • Average Household Income: $58,687 • 56.5% of population is Hispanic • 39.1 % completed some college or have a degree • 9. 1 % have completed a Bachelor's or higher degree Education In Fort Lupton, as in the entire Northern Colorado area, we value education. Aims Community college located in Fort b Lupton, has recently doubled the size of their campus for the new Oil and Gas technologies program, a new Ag Business and Production program and a larger welding program. Fort Lupton is also within easy commuting distance of the Colorado School of Mines, the University of Colorado and the University of Northern Colorado. In addition, Fort Lupton is only a short drive from Brighton with Colorado State University (Brighton) and Front Range Community College campuses in Brighton. Over 39.1 % of our adult residents have completed some college or have a college degree. Of this number, 9.1 % have completed a Bachelor's degree or higher. Housing The housing market is tight in Fort Lupton at this time, but planned housing will allow the new resident a variety of housing options, from affordable executive housing with very large lots, to high quality rental apartments. Cost of Living Fort Lupton's cost of living is lower than many other communities in the Denver metro area. With the exceptional views of the mountains, good air quality compared to the Denver metro area, a historic downtown, and a growing job market, Fort Lupton is the place to call home. Source Buxton's Complete Demographic Comparison Report APPENDIX 4 U.S. CENSUS BUREAU, DEMOGRAPHICS FOR WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County QuickFacts from the US Census Bureau http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/08/08123.html II Search State & County QuickFacts Thank you for your feedback! The new delivers the following improvements: Search by zip code, improved table display, browse more data feature, download data, and more. Weld County, Colorado People QuickFacts Weld County Colorado Population, 2014 estimate 277,670 5,355,866 Population, 2010 (April 1) estimates base 252,837 5,029,324 Population, percent change - April 1 , 2010 to July 1, 2014 9.8% 6.5% Population, 2010 252,825 5,029,196 Persons under 5 years, percent, 2014 7.3% 6.3% Persons under 18 years, percent, 2014 26.9% 23.3% Persons 65 years and over, percent, 2014 11.1% 12.7% Female persons, percent, 2014 49.6% 49.8% White alone, percent, 2014 (a) 93.1% 87.7% Black or African American alone, percent, 2014 (a) 1.4% 4.5% American Indian and Alaska Native alone, percent, 2014 (a) 1.7% 1.6% Asian alone, percent, 2014 (a) 1.5% 3.1% Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone, percent, 2014 (a) 0.2% 0.2% T\\In n• IAnen Onnnn Ynn of 7f\1 A 7 A 0/ 1 nO/ 1 YYV VI IYIVIV 1 \iAV VJ, �./VIVVllt, LV lT L. I /V L.CO /V Hispanic or Latino, percent, 2014 (b) 28.8% 21.2% White alone, not Hispanic or Latino, percent, 2014 66.7% 69.0% Living in same house 1 year & over, percent, 2009-2013 80.7% 80.7% Foreign born persons, percent, 2009-2013 8.5% 9.7% Language other than English spoken at home, pct age 5+, 2009-2013 18.5% 16.8% High school graduate or higher, percent of persons age 25+, 2009-2013 85.6% 90.2% Bachelor's degree or higher, percent of persons age 25+, 2009-2013 25.9% 37.0% Veterans, 2009-2013 16,805 399,458 Mean travel time to work (minutes), workers age 16+, 2009-2013 26.2 24.5 Housing units, 2014 100,070 2,276,184 Homeownership rate, 2009-2013 70.1% 65.4% Housing units in multi-unit structures, percent, 2009-2013 16.2% 25.9% Median value of owner-occupied housing units, 2009-2013 $191,500 $236,200 Households, 2009-2013 90,465 1,977,591 Persons per household, 2009-2013 2.79 2.53 Per capita money income in past 12 months (2013 dollars), 2009-2013 $25,468 $31 ,109 Median household income, 2009-2013 $57,180 $58,433 Persons below poverty level, percent, 2009-2013 14.7% 13.2% Business QulckFacts Weld County Colorado Private nonfarm establishments, 2013 5,376 154,8751 Private nonfarm employment, 2013 71,783 2,090,9751 Private nonfarm employment, percent change, 2012-2013 2.9% 2.7%1 Nonemployer establishments, 2013 19,020 447,586 Total number of firms, 2007 23,024 547,770 Black-owned firms, percent, 2007 0.6% 1.7% American Indian- and Alaska Native-owned firms, percent, 2007 1 .4% 0.8% Asian-owned firms, percent, 2007 1 .5% 2.6% Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander-owned firms, percent, 2007 F 0.1% Hispanic-owned firms, percent, 2007 S 6.2% Women-owned firms, percent, 2007 25.4% 29.2% Manufacturers shipments, 2007 ($1000) 4,193,672 46,331 ,953 Merchant wholesaler sales, 2007 ($1000) D 53,598,986 Retail sales, 2007 ($1000) 2,246,115 65,896,788 1 of 2 10/30/2015 10:55 AM Weld County QuickFacts from the US Census Bureau http://quickfacts.census.gov/gfd/states/08/08123.html Retail sales per capita, 2007 $9,272 $13,609 Accommodation and food services sales, 2007 ($1000) 217,231 11,440,395 Building permits, 2014 2,708 28,686 Geography Qulckracts Weld County Colorado Land area in square miles, 2010 3,987.24 103,641.89 Persons per square mile, 2010 63.4 48.5 FIPS Code 123 08 Metropolitan or Micropolitan Statistical Area Greeley, CO Metro Area 1: Includes data not distributed by county. (a) Includes persons reporting only one race. (b) Hispanics may be of any race, so also are included in applicable race categories. O: Suppressed to avoid disclosure of confidential information F: Fewer than 25 firms FN: Footnote on this item for this area in place of data NA: Not available S: Suppressed; does not meet publication standards X: Not applicable Z: Value greater than zero but less than half unit of measure shown Source U.S. Census Bureau: State and County QuickFacts. Data derived from Population Estimates, American Community Survey, Census of Population and Housing, State and County Housing Unit Estimates, County Business Patterns, Nonemployer Statistics, Economic Census, Survey of Business Owners, Building Permits Last Revised: Wednesday, 14-Oct-2015 15:53:40 EDT ABOUT US FIND DATA BUSINESS& INDUSTRY PEOPLE & HOUSEHOLDS SPECIAL TOPICS NEWSROOM nu 2 of 2 10/30/2015 10:55 AM APPENDIX 5 NCRS SOIL SURVEY REPORT USDA United States A product of the National Custom Soil Resource a Department of Cooperative Soil Survey, Agriculture a joint effort of the United Report for N RCS States Department of p Agriculture and other We I d C o u n ty , Federal agencies, State Natural agencies including the C O I � ra d O Resources Agricultural Experiment ' Conservation Stations, and local Service participants Southern Part FULTON VILLAGE ... - . T -•-. ♦ - _ -sail Snort 1,V✓4. y ., izty .- • I All I, Aiii . . -- Itit 'Air r. , It, , pia , ,r t• j „tie Si gal ijai il ,4 ‘. , 41: r ' .{,, �`_ ; r ..". - ' • ISMOilit � lit S t 1 . t Sila at . i , - s 4 POI r ` to N i s f I�iR ea ' • As• • • • , � - • . N 44. ., ' . f . - - � , 1 I r' • F 1 .: i ' L a...� w�~ - i p' i .,1 ,I' r - •' , 1: 1 1 11, ` , . 1 • rte- i l y.� rf ' , ' ». • Y •`A - 4 t f r WW 1 -4 it is * .,! 1 is Il. a ii;all k..........4, . ,I - fir-' �. j y • , u �� 8,000 tt :- 1• Rah , i. i' v'-rr , ' z ' `q�41 I October 30, 2015 b Preface Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas. They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers. Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand, protect, or enhance the environment. Various iand use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions. The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations. Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/ nres/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service �Ceenter (http:// VIflII J.JIa.GgV V.L.4J'ia.gvv/iv�gt%dII pp?G j Ii%ay l II or 7 vur ill fle#S state soil Scientist (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/contactus/? cid=nrcs142p2_053951 ). Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to basements or underground installations. The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey. Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means 2 for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. 3 Contents Preface .2 How Soil Surveys Are Made 5 Soil Map 7 Soil Map 8 Legend 9 Map Unit Legend 10 Map Unit Descriptions 10 Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part 12 1—Altvan loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes 12 30—Julesburg sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes 13 75—Vona sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes 14 76 Vona sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes 15 References 17 4 How Soil Surveys Are Made Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length, and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other biological activity. Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA, The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind of landform or with a segment of the landform, By observing the soils and miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a specific location on the landscape. Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented by an understanding of the soil-vegetation-landscape relationship, are sufficient to verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries. Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units). Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the 5 Custom Soil Resource Report individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and research. The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas. Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map. The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape, and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the soil- landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at specific locations. Once the soil-landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded. These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color, depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil typically vary from one point to another across the landscape. Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other properties. While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field-observed characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management. Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same kinds of soil. Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example, soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date. After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings, fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately. 6 Soil Map The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit. 7 Custom Soil Resource Report N Soil Map in 515700 515760 515820 515880 515940 51600 40° 4'23"N I - 40° 4'23"N , r _ _ _- � _ _ __ - _ rhil St .� Y !lilt • . ti 1 • I . s pa) , " ' I • _ • •• • • i ., •�,t • f • � Kaiiii' PI 1 • l _ !\ 30 I ' . 1) i 4. • w 1 ' , , • 1• i 11 ' .W, 1 „• -• . _ii!, pipi i r _.I � 1 I , i �' t5'. fit' ••S , i� ~•_� .. • !,'i1!. 1 �. 'j ' M . rrj -s. • - r 11141 • We Al .• , • i Tb�- ti 1 Iloilo .L. " •y f',rcl +• 31 l n i . , O i - , . 'at • I la_J ' At • P. pr ,1 : Om . ..rte , .......is t'a•z 1 rt i I.t% . ii . _ , . _ a `1 A Ill •..I,• Vii`. 4 F ••1 • � - i y' . kI �r� Mi . ' '^ 51 t .••• • ' ' • �. ,% • "N k I ii i Is • it. ,. ;we i filet Lc. I I . • , • i Mir" 1044 1 jil t - y- Lone Pine St Driveway .7 • • 1 1 rkensitiiii;_: m i 40° 48N .., I z :I - ., ' _ 40° 4'8"N 515700 515760 515820 515880 515940 516000 3 3 N it Map Scale: 1:2,340 if petted on A portrait(8.5" x 11")sheet _,Meters g N 0 30 60 120 180 A - t 0 ton 200 400 600 Map projection: Web Me+rabor Cornier coordhates: WGS84 Edge tics: IJTM Zone 13N WGS84 8 8� 41 o c) C7 O) C C O a') E 0 o ` C a) ¢ . a to 6 C t Ti NNN 5 th8 9 �p O .� 0 a) t6 to liir O ., C) C z co 2 w0 ) N 'O Cl. d r w o ,G - E4aw CO cnN aoi `n � E !� E N � �' a c 0 � � o c � � t° C �' Q �° 'a E Z E ai ac�aW ° o a0 � o � E y E. 0 at co 0 E om c 0 0 (/) o c 0 z o " w � E Q CO o 4 a G jd a� � Nti � Z co sia5ii ° < m coa :a c Nal di v°i `a ca cn 0a n. C tC1 y v1 D O o cv 0 co 43 z 0 cu >• > o c o c N � y �' c m ., 3 c � o >, LL co c .0 10 'co ... .c ° o � v ° � E a o c �, o � E r� Z a o oa� cN 4) � n oulU .ocn ,k � U °- m y ° 0aa) > E c a>ia o c c� m _ Z a a0 -a o � c � Qa E Q O 0 0 a o a) U +? a) O 0 0 .- co c 0 CO E a "' a- a) ti to A, a' Q ° c as �!' aNi o not o .� C L a O Z t.-- a • U C ^ cocm ` .._. az co tV o on) v) t0 N to TJ �, EcEr >, ....0 >✓ om � v1 i cam ornor m dZ oa 73 N iio >. a1 ° ro m � 52 o0 c° •E � 6 al Z •a c ,cc°. . 0 ° 0) gam mcnn C �, o C To CCCNp U) a� � o � E � � w E � oac as 0o a a) a1° � Ch co 00a) 0 � � or° cp �io ea .0 aay c°, .c '- CO'a _ a� a - a >, co - a.' a E c`�o c� u/ c`oo 0 a a .0 U y > co a N o a � oo co coco •o 000 O0w � a EomE 'S wEav) Ea) E cn U n 'a3 ` cnto CDo oc.c I- 0 - ° t O a a) Et a) r O U) 4) O) cc O N N 0 ETa o aCuta 3 a ,.r LL 0 c E U) V) a) •O N0 .. c Z b r-. Cu C ., C cci t0 5 U co g E Cu o o a :� v N 2 o cn o > 5 o a) c can s w 4) D M ¢a o z at o el woo < u. w w of � � 0 3 I- m W J in a , c .. Q o in �, E v c C y d a d ,� a 3) eg — T N c c cD c 123 m a t, gC qi 0 �-i ... — •a a 0 a a a P a. O ° per. >, p O w 3 �j o y, y tR t9 R 41 — a c O O O co Q LL 5 E >. j > v c0 a C) 0 c c > § O 'D a o— r 'o c o o m ° �° �° m m `° c `a 4) R c0 C :2 in e ¢ V) 0 to o m m U U O O .� i m a. et v) ia 16 rai �y I r - 1O L D Z X O X F• O * 1 l O > 1{` 0.0 $ 4). to* `=J IC is Custom Soil Resource Report Map Unit Legend Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part (CO618) I Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres In AOI Percent of AO1 1 Altvan loam, 0 to 1 percent 11 .5 81 .8% slopes 30 Julesburg sandy loam, 1 to 3 0.4 2.7% percent slopes 75 Vona sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent 1 .3 9.4% slopes 76 Vona sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent 0.9 6.1% slopes Totals for Area of Interest 14.1 100.0% Map Unit Descriptions The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit. A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability of ail natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class. Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils. Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and miscellaneous areas on the landscape. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate pure taxonomic 10 Custom Soil Resource Report classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas. An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions. Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil properties and qualities. Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement. Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness, salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series. Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas. These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups. A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar in all areas. Alpha-Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example. An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar. Alpha- Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example. 11 Custom Soil Resource Report Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part 1 —Altvan loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 361j Elevation: 4,500 to 4,900 feet Mean annual precipitation: 14 to 16 inches Mean annual air temperature: 46 to 48 degrees F Frost-free period: 130 to 150 days Farmland classification: Not prime farmland Map Unit Composition Altvan and similar soils: 90 percent Minor components: 10 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Altvan Setting Landform: Terraces Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Old alluvium Typical profile H1 - 0 to 10 inches: loam H2 - 10 to 25 inches: clay loam H3 - 25 to 60 inches: gravelly sand Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 1 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Runoff class: Low Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.20 to 2.00 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 5 percent Available water storage in profile: Low (about 5.7 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 3s Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e Hydrologic Soil Group: B Ecological site: Loamy Plains (R067BY002CO) Minor Components Cascajo Percent of map unit 9 percent Aquic haplustolls Percent of map unit: 1 percent 12 Custom Soil Resource Report Landform: Swales 30—Julesburg sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 3628 Elevation: 4,700 to 4,800 feet Mean annual precipitation: 15 to 19 inches Mean annual air temperature: 48 to 52 degrees F Frost-free period: 145 to 155 days Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated and the product of I (soil erodibility) x C (climate factor) does not exceed 60 Map Unit Composition Julesburg and similar soils: 90 percent Minor components: 10 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Julesburg Setting Landform: Terraces Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: South platte river alluvium Typical profile H1 - 0 to 12 inches: sandy loam H2 - 12 to 27 inches: sandy loam H3 - 27 to 60 inches: sand Properties and qualities Slope: 1 to 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Runoff class: Very low Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (2.00 to 6.00 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 6.5 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 2e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e Hydrologic Soil Group: A Ecological site: Sandy Plains (R067BY024CO) 13 Custom Soil Resource Report Minor Components Valent Percent of map unit: 5 percent Remmit H Percent of map unit: 5 percent 75—Vona sandy loam , 0 to 1 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 363v Elevation: 4,650 to 4,950 feet Mean annual precipitation: 13 to 15 inches Mean annual air temperature: 48 to 55 degrees F Frost-free period: 130 to 160 days Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Map Unit Composition Vona and similar soils: 85 percent Minor components: 15 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Vona Setting anrlfnrn'r Terraces L f I1.1! I I ! . I V1 1 V\rV Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Alluvium Typical profile H1 - 0 to 6 inches: sandy loam H2 - 6 to 28 inches: fine sandy loam H3 - 28 to 60 inches: sandy loam Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 1 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Runoff class: Very low Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1 .98 to 6.00 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 15 percent Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to slightly saline (0.0 to 4.0 mmhos/cm) Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 6.8 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 3e 14 Custom Soil Resource Report Hydrologic Soil Group: A Ecological site: Sandy Plains (R067BY024CO) Minor Components Remmit Percent of map unit: 11 percent Olney Percent of map unit: 4 percent 76—Vona sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 363w Elevation: 4,600 to 5,200 feet Mean annual precipitation: 13 to 15 inches Mean annual air temperature: 48 to 55 degrees F Frost-free period: 130 to 160 days Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Map Unit Composition Vona and similar soils: 85 percent Minor components: 15 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Vona Setting Landform: Terraces, plains Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Alluvium and/or eolian deposits Typical profile H1 - 0 to 6 inches: sandy loam H2 - 6 to 28 inches: fine sandy loam H3 - 28 to 60 inches: sandy loam Properties and qualities Slope: 1 to 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Runoff class: Very low Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1 .98 to 6.00 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 15 percent Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to slightly saline (0.0 to 4.0 mmhos/cm) Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 6.8 inches) 15 Custom Soil Resource Report Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 3e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e Hydrologic Soil Group: A Ecological site: Sandy Plains (R067BY024CO) ri Minor Components Remmit Percent of map unit 9 percent Olney Percent of map unit 3 percent Julesburg Percent of map unit 3 percent 16 References American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling and testing. 24th edition. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00. Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deep-water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service FWS/OBS-79/31 . Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States. Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States. Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric soils in the United States. National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries. Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/ detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_054262 Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/ nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053577 142p2_053577 Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/ portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053580 Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands Section. United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical Report Y-87-1 . United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National forestry manual. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/ home/?cid=nrcs142p2_053374 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National range and pasture handbook. http://www. nrcs. usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/ detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084 17 Custom Soil Resource Report United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/ nrcs/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nrcs142p2_054242 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/? cid=nres142p2_053624 United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961 . Land capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http:// www.n res. usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_052290.pdf 18 APPENDIX 6 CULTURAL RESOURCE SURVEY JA ME.5 E NTE..RPRI5E.5 INC. James M. brechtel, Principal Investigator P•o• box i 06+, tort Collins, Colorado 80522 (970)4.84-_) 555 office & lax, (970)2. i 5-4307 mobile }bjei@mesanetworlcs.net 6 October 2006 Jeanne Lee 51 Cherry Hills Farm Drive Englewood, CO 80113 Dear Ms. Lee: Enclosed is the Cultural Resource Survey report for the proposed Lee NCWCD Inclusion in Weld Co., Colorado. Since it appears that no significant cultural resources will be affected, cultural resource clearance for this project is apparently indicated. This report has been sent to the Bureau of Reclamation Archaeologist in Loveland, Colorado ier agency review and approval. Please note that this letter and report do not convey cultural resource clearance for this project, such clearance must be obtained only through the appropriate reviewing/management agency, e.g. Bureau of Reclamation and Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District. Please contact me if I may be of further service, or if you have any questions about the enclosed report. Invoice # 0625 is enclosed. Thank you for your business, and good luck with this project. S'ncerely. aftedAp (James M. Brechtel, M.A. enc. OA}-1 I' 1420 OAl-ll' Use Only: OAI II' Doe . No. _ - _ OAHP Project No. Colorado Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation LIMITED- RESULTS CULTURAL RESOURCE SURVEY FORM (page 1 of 3) Small scale limited results projects include block surveys under 160 acres with linear surveys under four miles. Additionally, there should be no sites and a maximum of four Isolated Finds. This form must be typed. 1. IDENTIFICATION I . Report Title (include County): Intensive Cullum! Resource Survey ()Proposed Lee NCH/CD Inclwcwn. Weld Co. 2. Date of Field Work: 5 September 2006 3. Form completed by: James Brechtel Date: 6 October 2006 4. Survey Organization/Agency: James Enterprises Inc. Principal Investigator: James Brechtel Principal Investigator's Signature: Ceres ,5reokel Other Crew: none Address: P.O. Box 1064, Ft. Collins, CO 80522 5. Lead Agency / Land Owner: Lead Agency: BOR; Land Owner: George esc Jeanne Lee Contact: Bob Burton, BOR Address: Bureau of Reclamation. I .oveland, CO 6. Client: Jeanne Lee 7. Permit Type and Number: BOR CRUP# 06-GP-07-S 8. Report / Contract Number: 9. Comments: II . DESCRIPTION OF UNDERTAKING / PROJECT 10. Type of Undertaking: Inclusion of undeveloped parcel within Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District (NCWC'D), in order to obtain domestic water service. 11 . Size of Undertaking (acres): +/- 12 Size of Project (if different) same 12. Nature of the Anticipated Disturbance: Trenching to install water line(s). 13. Comments: Residential development will occur within the surveyed parcel at unspecified locations. Limited-Results Archaeological Survey Form (Page 2 of 3) III. PROJECT LOCATION Please attach a photocopy of USGS Quad. clearly showing the project location. The Quad. should be clearly labeled with the Prime Meridian, Township, Range, Section(s), Quad. map name, size, and date. Please do not reduce or enlarge the photocopy. 14. Description: Project is located on the eastern Colorado High Plains in southwestern Weld Co.. in the town of Ft. Lupton, about 3/4 mi. south of l-Iighway 52 & 3/4 mi. east of the South Plane River. 15 . Legal Location: Quad. Map: Ft. Lupton Date(s): 1988 Principal Meridian: 6th x NM _ Ute NOTE: Only generalized subdivision ("quarter quarters") within each section is needed Township: IN Range: 66W Sec. : 7 1 /4s NE/NE If section(s) is irregular, explain alignment method: 16. Total number of acres surveyed: +/- 12 17. Comments: Surveyed an irregular, rectangular parcel, w/max. dimensions about 500 x 1050 ft. IV. ENVIRONMENT 18. General Topographic Setting: Formerly open plains; parcel is on virtually flat terrain. Current Land Use: Vacant, surrounded by residential neighborhoods; has been cultivated. 19. Flora: Mostly volunteer grain, weedy plants, & some brome-like grasses. 20. Soils/Geology: Silty/sandy loam, underlain by Cretaceous sedimentary bedrock. 21 . Ground Visibility: 45-85%, generally adequate visibility for purposes of this survey. 22. Comments V. LITERATURE REVIEW 23 . Location of File Search: OAHP/COMPASS Date: 2 Sept 2006 24. Previous Survey Activity In the project area: COMPASS records indicate that a partial survey of farmsteads in Weld Co, including at least part of the current project section, was conducted in 1988, & 1 farmstead was recorded in the project section. In the general region: In addition to the survey noted above, several highway related surveys have been conducted in this general area previously; also, a number of wellsites & NCWCD inclusions within a 10-mi. radius of the current project have been conducted by the author of this report during the past 20 years. Limited-Results Archaeological Survey Form (page 3 of 3) V. LITERATURE REVIEW (continued) 25. Known Cultural Resources In the project area: Site 5WL1384, a 1910-era farmstead, has been recorded within the project section. This site has been field-evaluated no! eligible for the NRHP. Its exact location within this section is questionable. since the legal location & UFM coordinates listed for this site in COMPASS do not coincide. Field survey determined that this site is not located within or adjacent to the surveyed parcel . In the general region (summarize): More than 4,300 sites & isolated finds, representing all prehistoric stages from Paleoindian thru Late Prehistoric ( 12,000 B.C. - 1870 A. D.), as well as pioneer-era Euroamerican resources, have been documented in Weld Co. previously. 26. Expected Results: Low potential was anticipated for prehistoric sites because of project's distance from reliable water source & lack of viewshed. Some potential was anticipated for historic resources related to homesteading/agriculture themes. VI. STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES 27. NI IPA 1966 compliance, to be accomplished by locating, recording, evaluating, & submitting management recommendations for all potentially NRI-IP-significant cultural resources within the project's area of potential effect. V11, FIELD METHODS 28. Definitions: Site At least 5 discrete artifacts, representing an identifiable locus of patterned cultural activity, or a single cultural feature more than 50 years old. IF Fewer than 5 discrete artifacts. 29. Describe Survey Method: Parallel, pedestrian transects, oriented generally east-west & spaced not more than 10- 15 meters apart, were used to cover all of the surveyed parcel uniformly. VIII. RESULTS: No significant cultural resources were observed. Some modern roadside litter. 30. List IFs if applicable. Indicate IF locations on the map completed for Part III. 31 . Using your professional knowledge of the region, why are there none or very limited cultural remains in the project area? Is there subsurface potential? Absence of significant resources may be related to vagaries in the distribution & preservation of such resources generally. Also. surveyed area is some distance from reliable water sources & lacks extensive viewshed, probably has been cultivated in the past, & has been surrounded for some time by established residential neighborhoods. 514000m E. 515 Doom E. 516o00m E. WGSS4 Zone 13T 517000mE. E. iv( O_.......e c i r I I e _b \ _ 1 I Al PROJECT 1•L&P I ! IN ;. ._ . _ • _ - - _1 4 LEE NCW�'CD INCLUSION32 44. - , { z ' \\ •, N"E/N'E1/4 SEC 7-TIN-R66W 6TH P.M . _ •�.' ° �� ..-J z E , WELD CO. CO; USGS I t AD: FT. LUPTON 1988 "4 :'� '• 1 /� `'-- -• . • i.. 2 — ----) -.slimier( - 1 cri L .....--/A: i i-- — Filo .. ille l • ---A __ ;in . . . ._ ... 1 Slat;c:,nal _ t- 10 .iir-J2_,, ••• • ' I 1 r �•. 4907 n i\Iti 't\ Star• (c-1K, , . .. cika-C h . ... 80 1 • , 4101 f .... - ... -- ..-,..., _ _ ..., i . - '.---4",1 I t Z •— • ` rw ► l l ; 1 r i / -{-- �. . Peerso : t ! Y ` IIII _- �� : • •� .`;;;;:l Fort upt n • • c on / �, ,o peck ` � l ii..: r" f - I. i..t._..:.... , i....._ ‘, I ( (1 O 17---c . t ( % 0 ( gm .. , : ( .. • . , i 1 • C �jw I +i . 0. A 1y!, or . f 1-g- • ,� t:, . r. I. I N., pi bill . , . 1 / 1 I - ••• a . . •1)v �� t t r I E j r �9 III V f%I/ E CO ,- ') l' s��y __i (�` '�I SUbBldliQll`� / �• ' Dt "� n Well j 7 • /Hillside i ,--- -- I JJLone Pin � k' ��, � , .�:� F - metary , ire / ` kl� p ,--- ' 1 AREA SURVEYED y .j . ..\ o t, , ) / • 1 1 ( , il z 1 __* kl. 4(.....Z. co CI\ b. /'.," • . T , . ff) , • , rn tr GreWl '• o •' • \� c. • • A r_......„ i i '- "" • i ) i • 7 1 r - �I 1Rolls • E I . _ `` J111 • Z \ {,1. f 4832 `. . ) • 1 c ! .o v r t i ti1/4, 4,., ' - en - t; ,, , + f'`r /1 / Vt (n / ( . ? I ( 1 3 �a • 18 • ' '" `--�' ia - 1t 1 7 1 Z f k / z o 1/ i lir i ( ‘ rI) QE J \ --WJ • J • • i o n . ()to I I en 4 -' it • �i 11 1 1, : jr , , 514Doom E, s 150oom E, 516000m E, WGS84 Zone 13T 51700om E• Tip AA' 9 .5 1 MILE: lo= � , 000 FEET 9 ._.. _ -;000 METERS 1iap created with TOPO% ' O2003 National Geographic (w w.natianalgeographic.coin'topo) Lee NCWCD Inclusion I • ..r7+' ...!a •�. ♦ 4414111 �r . ' ti '=i.1,-, y � _. t. ry t 1 ` I 1 r- • • • , a• !• - • •iJt.. ' ` • a 7R1 ,- r • 1 ^, , -. _ 1. _ ' 'I. 1•� - 3 ++•♦ l 4. • ,1,,,,,) ,...4 :.,,... • r1 \. •r4, iS I • 4.III-I• iy •. a+r•4� _r l- • it -14, •{• /�J' \�� At a'"• i — 1 • A4. , }�' ,, („ .r. r �i.•1 r. + , irk A rtk':. 9_ ti • , i•- �'li , nr'sj• 1, •> ' •P'... •.11 • 1 ii1:3r7114('''r < .n,.. ins 1' ,.{ 't, ! ilirj r P. I ^{,:/1• 'iT ♦ - I ot -1\- —e• 1 J ' {I,• f: +' 44 . ♦.,• ,11 .. 11, t Rr.4j� IM{it K, •. • - t� '�('\,, t 4, "'1 - '• 1 • _ ; , , • , ,K4-0 ti. ..,.. .NJe_ ,', ... .. ♦ "a •7. . .i. ,1 , /' (^. ►C ' �h2b -. 4 y.♦ ;-y•frLil,�f'•r.• .,t.)• i rr_," 1/•1` i•L�R. A ;,'t• -;. • •2 ` ice -Ph r., i . .L ',r-j) •��f:R yyM, 4 s y i1�J`R M r1 1-„-R 1 • {'Y1 i . . • err! � .'., Yr Ni } �i['►•• t,-4+ rl i •' -3tt4t : � .•! '+ '~ 1� �I .• j = f;ti •jts � ` .-t .:�yrt't ' ,!.;i1�'� r`F�t�.. • e ... `wqt ....... •. !tY....• �. am �f+ • 4.• : .I S. ))/Pori/ � • _ al .II. Cc111,,,` 1 le .I 1: °: .s",4# i-: 01t . L.- Y . °Ilk • •;. ' • •. ,p•. , r ~e.,, .. Ir. .s• I• : s$,,,!..t. t J.• • .L• •if i• .J , • I : jr • •t.'..T •It` ► it 1* ' 0 . �``i.'` • �t ♦^�'�jt, ie9'.\p•Ll ., � U / I r ,•• •tn.. f s./ r1 '7 i .. t y •,i b' t .1 •,, i r•.• i•'• i 1roffi ��Ik1=; ri! t'. I. . � • a°'• / l �♦ ^,. ; Y. . i ..• ,� . I• ..r �1 i � . '!� /'/ • Jr'�T` � • a. ' J 'R• 'Y �� 4 �`1'. r."'; �'4 ,7h�1 •T , :_JYiaJ --: ♦ �', ♦I�siv sr,. ''..? j . t '•. w � . • $, 1Alf l• e% ♦ ,rJ /; 14.3•.7.1 4i>'.( • j si N, _.. t• {.•la• ' • •• „....r,'� •',��{ - ' h • N.1 1' •'� :,� , �.(l, .� II I-1 '•• , „xv.ra•.♦♦♦. ,..4- 4�y• rl 1. . •. . •.y`. 7 •..04,,- L'�• ` ��' ,r.30,0.09. .4. r , v.f r� :tt itylt[�tl_ • + .p�. -- • • /,1,y + 4r%' v. _•r '`� firs - j . , . ,f� I1♦.`ai •. . (...,` h,[ -� �, y- +`^ fey '" 7 : 1 A.l a .�i •' N< r •r w f � it + k,1�� ! <JV '♦i.r''T1�`.,* •1 �11. - ilL,.t' 1 n�.♦ / •l 1 , �1 ♦ it �'1''� t� ♦Lr • •j• .�i :•./,..r + ,+.:./. r t ,-Jdt .. 'r. .• i...�.t 1, ..11 Y , . ' c ett,11,4,,; • k r ' !t'. -•! ;r.,. yv .• • •'. .4e"•.!�Y�r�.1 ...71y . ., ,-� �} 1(A•I• ►2 .. `..s.Y�. . •/o �� •• • . se, ' I. . • -r ' .16i..11-•: 1' �� .� fir'' /M 161:1;... y tt1 '•- . {.P' .j i•tl'tl ' . /l yJ * _ . . ,,. • • ....1 .' • i.`4e.••'tf' �4 f11'. 1' i �r1�L� -k •-ir • •• •i �t.j•• ; r.`1r`�n'-i ki•iy`�.. ,`I' r. 1f ?4 t,,, .1j e•Is..�_��7.,. ,�1 4,14;LY�1 _ ,�•� 5'r K1 'I 1.7 t 1'. . • , , ,� '. ;1 }•t;.!i~{,••••,..;74.3....49.( rfrit?j,j `` A�1A �j7 )f J 'Tti r ;a�E�C•; ` j\ ;+ 0�' ri 4i4.O-4.4 _ . f7 C.' ,,` *� .'4►. T• -• I , 1.'411}'5 env. . ••• '.11 I ' 7 • , 1/k'� Tls-60.:4r".,"•:14.4 �fL 1r l� #.[/',,�_ i,•►.. 1 t iNi. p r ♦ , r Ai r ♦ deA .• -'7'►. • I 'a' ••'., (V.�j, 1 - a t i. 1 T _3 _ * . ,- 1,yY, ' f C• , ' ,. • •'h . .. %. . i. 1 .t •p. '• Ii,. .. + •YIr 1, •1..., .._.7?1. Vt.j� 7 14 . '',C��'.tl .l• ` t r • "'- • 11 •, '��~ ', � . !•Tr'. _ i 411`i:/: • • ',`. -.. : r V} • tt -, .�!',�� uq x ,-• \.-II . /.. t �,.l•,'1.. 1 .1 ♦ ri• l•l ' t . ' t, ..•r •'<,• e. { �t :•,'.4-: •••. . .t., <. ,i `i r _ pr; •• ;/_f i l L !1 q • f� ♦ �� Y y„l. � a f'. L ,! , . 1 ♦S .f:e.' . �• 4";;1 ,1_ .•.4-: �•tr•i.11 Vi4y,jt --'4` .--11% • 1 ' J . t /'.7•. j;'t •L .+ . / , `k'. . 4.'4% ♦< j'. . t• .l. .,,, ,, ,. `\V. r• •s + ',,,- r •• !i ) , .• ..4.••• • '1•' - _4i� ' cpc ,2 • i. 1 �tt \.. ,'/ ?. ,,,,,...' ,, ,,;:-.._;.,c...„4-tL .'•i1 1• n.` ; _t.♦ r Pl .. i♦ i- 1.1. •IT i •• , , I ' ••1 ,•,..,y J Pr. f� • 7.11 4 , L • �,� t: ••��. ♦��_ , �.t ,rl•-.!/ t r • t.. : } r, • . • ,4, lt'• , _ it• I . t' • (II • y . . 1 t , r ! ♦. , !. ,a • • 1t' r .°,, .b•`1'' tr RL'a `•f1. „ _ 1,. ;it?: J i t L•"• r , •1 . •,t• . ` � • ' ` . •'••,,,, 1 j _ . � .J•,'1.?v.; Photo 003: Overview of surveyed area, looking north, Fulton Ave. @ left. 314000m E. s 15oo0m E. 516000m E. WGSS4 Zone 13T s 17000m E . .A1 ! IPROJECTMAPJII itt °' i ....c, ,.. , , . \, . ir 3 1 . �aeei +ae . _ LEE NC«�CD INCLUSION 4, —N =-T• 32 c "�_ z ' I \ 111(i NE.INE1/4 SEC 7-T1N-R66Z�� 6TH P1'I -.: �� Z o ° ° �� WELD CO.1 CO: TAGS I FAD: FT. LUPTON 1988 , ; �V /- , • r01 _ 4ti . •-l. -- - - • irk steer -�-duo., iumipc... 1.- -. . f. - i . Doi:, •_ ;if . 1074;,), g t.,1 I,: : : Iv- )° S (Won. L...71 \ 0 f.... I I \it. II \\I. %Y.'s: •*.. • • 1 c. .... .eifieR.--- / l‘‘ • r c f ( (- 1 / / Primary {J� . _ _ ..,cp__ 2 1 +t`1 (S I + r 1 z / -,,,,,, I ..tio 11 i�\ J „ '• ;,r...•••. Fort Lupt n / • o I j• - �. CO r� r 1 f M i ' 8 �'�14 ( / , 1 f t I Tr Neva © _ , .-�; 5,11: Po 4897 ; • • • ` -J �` yit ;•a I Gay a t r I'.ir `� . —/ 1 � o r , --` IS �/ ), I e ` 4. i fit. SL. . a mom . •� i • I ii NcJ $ I 0' /♦ ---. ; f-, SubstatiQl 1 PI �j (1 i , 494 ( *, , b. . ;, I _ , _ _- wail ! cretin. , _` Lon® Pilo,F'Irlti, !�� / r Z.•. /� r i t % ° ,\,)i , , n , 1 • j ' I AREA SURVEYED '� tk .1 \ ) 1 1 . II o � 1Al 1 i i i 9 i ? 1 i l tit iL,Tito - 1 .. '. . . \ . , . ' ' : \ en ) . .. , -} i s ; \ i 0 N. j ' ..--/ Gravel =� • 1 . aa , -i1„r e i t ir I / J. ) ) 1i t- / • %VOlIS ' 1 7--a J_ { lir. i . • . It 3 . ' • 1, I I ic g c ..!",-; I t _11 / *Ls_ I 11 1 11 •.•l'i) •• jI{ • •------. ! $e) lir ._......),..._-.... ....:k 1 . t. ) E (i1( 1 I ,fo /p/� eGL 1`/ � ' l �.- 1 ; ' • ,. 1 ) 1 ,1 •tO 1'/ 1 il 1 • s 14000m E. s 15oo0m E, 516000m E. WG584 Zone 13T 5170oom E. IN 9 .S 1 MILE ii to 2;®;aoo FEET 9 -_•• ...JON METERS MMap created with TOPO!$ t2003 National Geographic ( s-Aw.nationalgeo raphie.com topo) et a 1 1 a� i A , / \ ' P - _.....-..c -IMIXIiT 1ST'S 1 ID I -_L i ',AMCOAQ _ • swot AOfK RA o ••=m• t________.r.---k a J — _ =•a Aro • Co G 0 Oa ----1 Li kt. *---\\-- , . '\ - 1 c r•• ri s; \ C Y r . _G 1 '• / _I - ' I I - a\`• — 1 1 .1 .. I • 41 / / / / q / Y / i $ I ® Will 19I a / � '� r ' , . ' �^-+� City of Ft.Lupton South Utility Extension. '. :, ' hill JrT Cotatalgp�Ines N .4 U.u.r mess..n.a.D Q ji'nj� Fu1Lrgn+CQ .Ott H ! !i r'' Sloan so..+.3rzurn l.Lp n�'ain,^P��rm 1 5:1`/ f ! 0--______ Li if _ .I r / - ..1. - rte.--\�-% 11---r—L---2 \ tot_ 0 r _ iii 1 I i — -i it , -r ,• 1� � Y I \ - —L L __ i_�j" UN1pN PACIFlC RAILROAD fri_____ ......s . 1 Lel e-- ....1 e _i Gli ar....,a 4- -} ----1 . ..lb l _. a er Iin b? 1111 ,/ J 1 '11 U • i i I IC _� C - - 1 i 0 )71 Co 1 I / t 1 i i III I f i t 1 �_ 1 +1 V• •� k' 1 I ' I I OS i COAT), RD 31 WI � SSIIIIIIIIIIS ` 26— i I @ wi i„ 6 a t A 1 i ' M� u JeT Consulting, Inc. i ' 1 ! , 6 I R '^+'- City of Ft. Wptoo South Utility Hilen�bn• R NI Ni r I loe Don.Av.n,.-SJ.D • q ..'^ Con Lvton`O LOW, • I f:. �• WGM Swim Map CT: MICY .e lNi:b1 .. . . - 1 ...Mae.0.• . 51 I • rte• rnr \\ U 5\ l r_rI ' „or., ifi eu I y � •�•• -- I -- A ell 1 L _ - -- DfXNt WestSea __-- ,.- — - - - __ -. - - - - I UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD l ......... I I ' q I - " -- - r—. 11 _ .................e------- -IL_ ____iiir-1 4..----j it I. 01 - • ii "- — .... -- -----'. — -.1"....... 'F Iv I II ICI —el ll ..ten_ _ __ — __- Sj ,I , I I \--: i g § 5 ii ` I . • I T <CI M!. ;.r ; 1 €.1* 6511141 ialii I is li• �•- City of Pt Lupton south 111 EIitfltf'ORtill N Ill u'UT Comfits, Sc. i Wut.weur SYxwn Mop n.ww>am i:�mrim. 1 - e - i r r II _- - _ r, ., _ \ - , ill ZI viel rai Ili; , . .....-- Q eillhitii ler 4.. )1; A V - -.. a> a 1 ; IA ,-, Oll, . iiip ... ti it Z -� r .1 - ii. t ♦ le t -i, t i i i , .1 , .... s -gig is lit a awo •..i fr , �• SS?. c elet � ) �' I. , r , -� Lae Z /XI e iii1114 .44 r ' I m yJr: _. .. r.•..w`. .wire-seat ?.�. ,r� ... w ` l+ I r.+-•..�nI YXEa to •, 4' •;lag �• -O II Lilt Ari rb - -..di Isielliyeat ,ii r i in t__ . m . ___, _ IL: . w". . .. , t• lit_.._eis It. _ ___ _ _ _ i lie 1 I__, i _ _ __ Fri 0 1 !gym 1 co ill 0 p‘r\ 'M' 0 1 a el I ' • o i will i ! ! I 71 I H R I r. SII illt p.me - 4 T A on :0 0 n n ? I> W. r- x. -I '0 zi 5 P 5' g v m o 0 o m r- m c �' m 2 3 +�► z v' a; -0 - a a Q. m m cu rt 7 = �' m CIT. a w, 0 0 0 a 0 m c4 cn °' n• N � -, o a > > a /� o = m _, o C �• c n 4> i -0 O. d �� `" al 2 v un ,? n 0 0 3 0 * CIO \\ , 3 to ca Sl - y ? 11 ! ,.rri + , lilla cn of R Ti I t_I SA I .• " 0. Ituh!J1 m a , .-+-; Ivi 3 11111 IF p.1 R. 2. fli traET llik 1 2.01 �i]ni " W A O O S r c g 3 d l_ � 50$5 !3 % - C m » J A 3. �. _ q (may , � iii m Q. a m a $ j 2!f l E • 2 co m C3 ' - 3ii. "sYi I n 1 i 12. m a fji) I 143y3Y c m m x m a m ��--i--- 333^evi Q. N ..� (a0 7 ill1 i r, _.. -i ssli i L,.a FULTON VILLAGE ANNEXATION SITUATED IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 7, T. 1 NORTH, R. 66 WEST OF THE 6th P.M. CITY OF FT. LUPTON, COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO ........"...c...‘„wee I , 1 e? , 4.//,-, /- ,- -. -.r—kri„,„,,—'_I' ---1.--A Lit T /f I —' /, L Ill biz,/ . . , U 111 /.= 1 l r w. 0 IIN , .� ` • affi r/ 12th ST k rz {�] .N . 1 1 - - __/), .eV , j. i • - lijitliW 1141 fliI 11 1.-- ."1 •11 :i =L �L I11 = iM •►w • i�i••�i�Zi r • ... /IaainJb � � lr : / .. ,� ', uu1 / 1 1 17.,, [III . ��/ . urll Ilur r� �iI ,(; . nluv1 aLi1� - / _ lt�l l lillbl �.J1hRt7i} .. r� /// f •-. rJt111' n nlFaa■ iTAthig —^ l ! 1.1� . uurl� nun tr. __MI:14631R ENs =`_ ' - unNlrrr�l Irfrnri? x , 1 ! / ! .1.)- f, • /. 11Ht�11111 1lffl I � �� ^ ' it Ill 1 _ � �� 1j'p�lilq f • /•; �` _ )I / 4f1111111. nitf 1�. [�{� �! ' IIt11 1 •C: s:TRI�`� 4 4493r ; . /0/ S.H. nn l f i�lil•� Il�tiU 1ilatfiiiffill tV Tj rctiw 'cVtt!ttV /� /lat 1 µmar- - ,- % ,�/ ,- . . 1// __ . / / r ,,:, , fre ...0 / /92 / . , • „ asHIL / / \ -07 ' • / / / pi / / / .1 / em ,/ , // \ , %;- FULTON );-' . I_ -1 Y �' •'fir: `• � %/ �!� VILLAGE .Ir. •. . •11• �i_S j, ANNEXATION • t: :..�. __ - 11 .884 AC+/- WCR 10- 2 N. HI?Ij1 / / .: / f. -/ 1 rn as �,, ,1 r - 2 I - 7 - . ) -I CITY BOUNDARY ANNEXATION VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1 "=2000' NORTH I . , I I R • } • raft, .. f .• .n1Y ,. j I 4 • .y ic • `•ter- ��,�•^` I ..••♦ • • Y , .. •1 Iwo $•••••1 1.....•..I. ./y..•.... ...•..•..E: i If, 1,4,7, .. 1 •^: . iSIP I. w I 1 (i • II .,I . fi I oe I 11 r: ♦r Ur Av - faut•Iq'pf NtNNUNHglgfll'1•�1/.N4'.Ii i 4 " - 1l _s ,f s,t { „. .. k 4 I i : It ill, , _ Ur 4. 4:. I tt' ' �II. •, �.I• •, I ^ .. ..^... .�-.�� •r `[ 1 • • • II0. �.. ,. ...' , 1.n ° i " • • IE • • __ ,..L , is , ArOll , E s Zoning Map ... 1 J Zoning Classification T •, i I1 ly1111N. mIS n'110 Na • OM I, tw,t OM C I Geed Cane .. •• RU toe,b'•tY ietGeVl! Ill CJ•wn4..wL4 -• •Ipeso.teen MM•/ Nj IIPa,tear '. 1 ti illai ' at no yin amino _Pais a open space _ ......•• Sal Pens ��fat l06n(Ay Wilt 1mM b.• -""-•�� C irw.f.....1 +Ion v.q lMv II i Mu•1,1MI .•I it �� . • -a onrearm.nu _ .. r . ..'e1lR'4 t•i1llT"t�•E!t''I!_ i': : . II Date: 12/30/2015 11 :17:03 AM WELD COUNTY TAX DISTRICT AND AUTHORITY REPORT FOR TAX YEAR 2015 Tax District - 2227 Authority Code Authority Name Mill Levy 0100 WELD COUNTY 15.800000 0207 SCHOOL DIST RE7-KERSEY 10.247000 0302 CENTRAL COLORADO WATER (CCW) 1 .533000 0309 CENTRAL COLORADO WATER SUBDISTRICT 1 .272000 (CCS) 0511 LASALLE FIRE 5.154000 0700 AIMS JUNIOR COLLEGE 6.325000 1050 HIGH PLAINS LIBRARY 3.308000 1201 PLATTE VALLEY CONSERVATION 0.000000 Total Levy 43.639000 Tax District - 2228 Authority Code Authority Name Mill Levy 0100 WELD COUNTY 15.800000 0208 SCHOOL DIST RE8-FORT LUPTON 15.755000 0301 NORTHERN COLORADO WATER (NCW) 1 .000000 0302 CENTRAL COLORADO WATER (CCW) 1 .533000 0309 CENTRAL COLORADO WATER SUBDISTRICT 1 .272000 (CCS) 0506 FORT LUPTON FIRE 9.343000 0530 FORT LUPTON FIRE (BOND 2022) 0.632000 0700 AIMS JUNIOR COLLEGE 6.325000 1050 HIGH PLAINS LIBRARY 3.308000 1201 PLATTE VALLEY CONSERVATION 0.000000 Total Levy 54.968000 Page 306 of 1582 t, 5 Q gg lax- Z ,! gag§ v h¢ b a o u. 4 • h U<₹K 'I b H 2 w w2 Iii yr: a vg rr r� a ai4e < sr p s7 �asw �± 1 tae fig+ ' h< s 0r �Ob A si F otL ~ O ///�'��_ Vo ti 50.4A agbile X ARI a gW5g�h a5�b F ₹b \ T )Z 9 U n t41 g I ghPoaheiv of Li §g ¢ !Olg c il6 l �q a g a��,ghs �" 8₹� b - h 8 h ,_ CC W g 3 1� p.g>bl, a gs I., or`a a ll F FNgW�`f �3„ QoasR ��4 1 b b a abXs baanXaA46?per - .a o a�� •g�� V $2e Lc: I` c94r & 3,? 4 cifyy' 7 -WS n •! ea Q !Pi f1' Fi 6xs 44,4 ,4,(84,z.x:-„Isi§ witlincl_i fpg; § 8 lits.54,..- R P $ $a 1. vm r < S swags y .II-8'R2SP < g Y '11 ih �F�c 7"x�h R<aa6 C•o: ..rrj� >!.W fY Y g w : ! i. ol § 24: It Xh g2i 1" r. Prn a g�� •y ay,b< i; as a CSC ' -{" g I i Mg zw Bake' o8beof,eg tliE tK�.ii r d ii t41 t g O o'Swy° 3 f a �{ ma Y ow 4 iM SM�j6'N'• 67200' J h G �� al hE~iG ₹ ' j<y 1t' o• g g Rg �$ ft 3 Z uZ -8 R L\7.0 J 4.1 IVil ��5{$ i€Wg i-liIga6 3 F is a Egg 7 :1�.."I 58 b � r ti e 1 .. \ / 1 rota ).,qKp w k )S KAHLL 8T. self WI M,/7*I I It r polo son,'-) 1 J r ' R rV�fl III • • id Pr.,--. 1 t f . al I • I 2 a N Y` • i cc 11RR 0 w W ; 14 I 1 �Zio Z8 b 1' III I • � o � in141 i F ZO $ te j $N O Icc 4{L 5 - ` , i W W 1" r DCC''' 8 i v _ ___ _ _ _ 0 ` I , • ....�.a_�. ..... ....� YIi N/.Y,Y:Ie'/.Y:.:.N..}.. i ii OS i Atkin n �, o J a0 0 I ` Z I r S : I 5 H r mg 24::C & ? gl may .,urw t . Z w � : � � �� m � �� C, Q Ub 0 Z n ,_so it UZHa R Q c!3 i _ O g q Pv wa W " Zip lij � C Q Zw {1 O f� ,' JV W J CC LL o $ O K W WZ °- Wz i- `I 2,, it IW 'LL -41 Z - D 3g Qgdo i ,:s �` s O � 0 — z; c it a O ? So x y DLL of Y a t ; i W O o w � . g is, . , (0 Zit' O, r Z LL d0 vi , 7 0 ui Av 2 O 1� 3 c� � U ',_ v5 :1-< S a ti w I IW Ip co k O O F- a • a . 2 w -it 1 a 4 : 0 J a I •'i I- zi ''' ''' 11 ce IL U Irw c- l _ 1 LONE PINE ST. a7tohrv+ncir af t, 9 elY COUNTRY DRY ` ' , v7 <2` 4 Q ESTATES ` s a iii 11 FLING NO. 1 z � S Date: 12/30/2015 11 :17:03 AM WELD COUNTY TAX DISTRICT AND AUTHORITY REPORT FOR TAX YEAR 2015 Tax District - 5196 Authority Code Authority Name Mill Levy 0100 WELD COUNTY 15.800000 0208 SCHOOL DIST RE8-FORT LUPTON 15.755000 0301 NORTHERN COLORADO WATER (NCW) 1 .000000 0302 CENTRAL COLORADO WATER (CCW) 1 .533000 0309 CENTRAL COLORADO WATER SUBDISTRICT 1 .272000 (CCS) 0407 FORT LUPTON CITY 28.977000 0506 FORT LUPTON FIRE 9.343000 0530 FORT LUPTON FIRE (BOND 2022) 0.632000 0700 AIMS JUNIOR COLLEGE 6.325000 0923 FORT LUPTON URBAN RENEWAL AUTHORITY 4 0.000000 (FLURA) 1050 HIGH PLAINS LIBRARY 3.308000 Total Levy 83.945000 Tax District - 5197 Authority Code Authority Name Mill Levy 0100 WELD COUNTY 15.800000 0208 SCHOOL DIST RE8-FORT LUPTON 15.755000 0301 NORTHERN COLORADO WATER (NCW) 1 .000000 0302 CENTRAL COLORADO WATER (CCW) 1 .533000 0506 FORT LUPTON FIRE 9.343000 0530 FORT LUPTON FIRE (BOND 2022) 0.632000 0700 AIMS JUNIOR COLLEGE 6.325000 0924 FORT LUPTON URBAN RENEWAL AUTHORITY 5 0.000000 (FLURA) 1050 HIGH PLAINS LIBRARY 3.308000 1201 PLATTE VALLEY CONSERVATION 0.000000 Total Levy 53.696000 Page 1516 of 1582 Hello