The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20162949.tiffCOLORADO Department of Public Health Er Environment Dedicated to protecting and improving the health and environment of the people of Colorado Weld County - Clerk to the Board 1150 0 St PO Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 September 13, 2016 Dear Sir or Madam: On September 15, 2016, the Air Pollution Control Division will begin a 30 -day public notice period for Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. A copy of this public notice and the public comment packet are enclosed. Thank you for assisting the Division by posting a copy of this public comment packet in your office. Public copies of these documents are required by Colorado Air Quality Control Commission regulations. The packet must be available for public inspection for a period of thirty (30) days from the beginning of the public notice period. Please send any comment regarding this public notice to the address below. Colorado Dept. of Public Health a Environment APCD-SS-B1 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South Denver, Colorado 80246-1530 Attention: Clara Gonzales Regards, Clara Gonzales Public Notice Coordinator Stationary Sources Program Air Pollution Control Division Enclosure Pcib IrG Review giaCD/ICa 4300 Cherry Creek Drive S., Denver, CO 80246-1530 P 303-692-2000 www.cotorado.gov/cdphe John W. Hickenlooper, Governor I Larry Wolk, MD, MSPH, Executive Director and Chief Medical Officer cc, PL Crhrin/-rP) Pw C£.R/CN/ZMI/Cf<) q/14/a©ICa 15 2016-2949 Air Pollution Control Division Notice Of A Proposed Title V Operating Permit Warranting Public Comment Website Title: Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. - Weld County Notice Period Begins: September 15, 2016 NOTICE is hereby given that an Operating Permit application has been submitted to the Colorado Air Pollution Control Division, 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South, Denver, Colorado 80246-1530, for the following source of air pollution: Applicant: Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. 11133 Eastman Park Drive Windsor, CO, 80550 Facility: Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. 11133 Eastman Park Drive Windsor, CO, 80550 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. has applied for an Operating Permit for the Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. in Weld County, CO. This facility manufacturers glass containers. This is the initial operating permit issuance and there are no modifications to the operating permit associated with this action because this is the initial operating permit. This is the initial operating permit issuance and there are no emission changes in the operating permit associated with this action because this is the initial operating permit. A copy of the application, including supplemental information, the Division's analysis, and a draft of Operating Permit 06OPWE289 have been filed with the Weld County Clerk's office. A copy of the draft permit and the Division's analysis are available on the Division's website at https://www.colorado.gov/pacific/cdphe/air- permit-public-notices. The Division has made a preliminary determination of approval of the application. Based on the information submitted by the applicant, the Division has prepared the draft operating permit for approval. Any interested person may contact Danielle Walker of the Division at (303) 692-3197 to obtain additional information. Any interested person may submit written comments to the Division concerning 1) the sufficiency of the preliminary analysis, 2) whether the permit application should be approved or denied, 3) the ability of the proposed activity to comply with applicable requirements, 4) the air quality impacts of, alternatives to, and control technology required on the source or modification, and 5) any other appropriate air quality considerations. Any interested person may submit a written request to the Division for a public comment hearing before the Colorado Air Quality Control Commission (Commission) to receive comments regarding the concerns listed above as well as the sufficiency of the preliminary analysis and whether the Division should approve or deny the permit application. If requested, the hearing will be held before the Commission within 60 days of its receipt of the request for a hearing unless a longer time period is agreed upon by the Division and the applicant. The hearing request must: 1) identify the individual or group requesting the hearing, 2) state his or her address and phone number, and 3) state the reason(s) for the request, the manner in which the person is affected by the proceedings, and an explanation of why the person's interests are not already adequately represented. The Division will receive and consider the written public comments and requests for any hearing for thirty calendar days after the date of this Notice. �� COLORADO 1 I �ir. Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment OPERATING PERMIT Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Issued: DATE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DIVISION COLORADO OPERATING PERMIT FACILITY NAME: Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. FACILITY TD: 123/4406 ISSUED: DRAFT EXPIRATION DATE: DRAFT MODIFICATIONS: See Appendix F of Permit OPERATING PERMIT N UMBER 06OPWE289 Issued in accordance with the provisions of Colorado Air Pollution Prevention and Control Act, 25-7-101 et seq. and applicable rules and regulations. ISSUED TO: Di At.JT cI•rr I nr,ATInr„ Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. 11133 Eastman Park Drive 11133 Eastman Park Drive Windsor, CO 80550 Windsor, CO 80550 INFORMATION RELIED UPON Operating Permit Application Received: And Additional Illlonllation Received. Nature of Business: Glass Containers Primary SIC: 3221 RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL Name: Edisson Flores Title: Plant Manager August 11, 2006 l,. J allualy 7, GUI",4111U. /YUgllJl LU, LU IJ FACILITY CONTACT PERSON Name: Gail Thompson Title: Environmental, lIealth and Safety Manager Phone: (970) 674-3801 Phone: (970) 674-3825 SUBMITTAL DEADLINES — First Semi -Annual Monitoring Period: Example October 1, 2010 — December 31, 2010 Subsequent Semi -Annual Monitoring Periods: Example January 1 — June 30, July 1 — December 31 Semi -Annual Monitoring Reports: Example Due February 1, 2011 & August 1, 2011 & subsequent years First Annual Compliance Period: Example October 1, 2010 — December 31, 2010 Subsequent Annual Compliance Periods: Example January 1 — December 31 Annual Compliance Certification: Example Due February 1, 2011 & subsequent years Note that the Semi -Annual Monitoring Reports and Annual Compliance report must be received at the Division office by 5:00 p.m. on the due date. Postmarked dates will not be accepted for the purposes of determining the timely receipt of those reports. TABLE OF CONTENTS: SECTION I - General Activities and Summary 1 1. Permitted Activities 1 2. Alternative Operating Scenarios 2 3. Non -Attainment New Source Review and Prevention of Significant Deterioration 2 4. Accidental Release Prevention Program (112(r)) 2 5. Compliance Assurance Monitoring (CAM) 2 6. Sununary of Emission Units 3 SECTION II - Specific Permit Terms 5 1. Point 001 and 002 — Two (2) O -I Custom Built Natural Gas Glass Melting Furnaces, Each Rated at 57.35 MMBtu/hr 5 2. Point 003 — Two (2) O-1 Custom Built Refiners, Rated at 10.58 MMBtu/hr Combined 15 3. Point 006 — Four (4) Bowman Annealing Lehrs, Rated at 32.0 MIVIBM/hr Combined 17 4. Point 008 — Four (4) O-1 Custom Built Forming Machines 19 5. Point 009 — Five (5) Hot End Surface Treatment (HEST) Systems 22 6. Point 011 and 012— Two (2) Caterpillar 34t2CDITA Diesel Fired Compression Ignition Emergency Generators, Each Site Rated at 823 HP 23 7. Point 015 — Packing Operations: Three (3) Marsh V7 Patrion Plus Carton Printing Machines, Three (3) Nordson PRO Blue Hot Glue Machines, and Four (4) O-1 Custom Built Cold End Spray Machines 28 8. Point 017 —Mould Shop 32 9. Point 018 — Two (2) Marley NC Class Cooling Towers 35 Systems Cooling Tower (2,000 gpm) and Furnaces Cooling Tower (500 gpm) 35 10. Point 019 and 020 —Batch House Operations, Thirty -Six (36) Flex Kleen Dust Collectors 37 11. Point 021 — Fugitive Emissions from Cutlet Storage Piles, Rail Car Unloading, Truck Unloading, and Haul Roads 40 12. Point 024 — One (1) Caterpillar C9 Diesel Fired Compression Ignition Emergency Generator, Site Rated at 457 HP 42 13. Point 025 — One (1) Automatic Blank Lubricant System 5I 14. Facility Wide Requirements 54 SECTION III - Permit Shield 55 1. Specific Non -Applicable Requirements 55 2. General Conditions 55 3. Stream -lined Conditions 55 SECTION IV - General Permit Conditions (ver 5/22/2012) 57 1. Administrative Changes 57 2. Certification Requirements 57 3. Common Provisions 57 4. Compliance Requirements 61 5. Emergency Provisions 62 6. Emission Controls for Asbestos 62 7. Emissions Trading, Marketable Permits, Economic Incentives 62 8. Fee Payment 62 9. Fugitive Particulate Emissions 63 10. Inspection and Entry 63 1 1 . Minor Permit Modifications 63 TABLE OF CONTENTS: 12. New Source Review 63 13. No Property Rights Conveyed 63 14. Odor 63 15. Off -Permit Changes to the Source 64 16. Opacity 64 17. Open Burning 64 18. Ozone Depleting Compounds 64 19. Permit Expiration and Renewal 64 20. Portable Sources 64 21. Prompt Deviation Reporting 64 22. Record Keeping and Reporting Requirements 65 23. Reopenings for Cause 66 24. Section 502(b)(10) Changes 66 25. Severability Clause 67 26. Significant Permit Modifications 67 27. Special Provisions Concerning the Acid Rain Program 67 LO. l lallsfcl ui ASJlgllll1e11t VI OWlleishi l 67 29. Volatile Organic Compounds 67 30. Wood Stoves and Wood burning Appliances 68 APPENDIX A - Inspection Information 70 1. Directions to Plant 70 2. Safety Equipment Required: 70 3. Facility Piot Plan: 70 4. List of Insignificant Activities. 70 APPENDIX B 73 Reporting Requirements and Definitions 73 Monitoring arid Pet-mit De-viation Report - Pali I 77 Monitoring and Permit Deviation Report - Part II 79 Monitoring and Permit Deviation Report - Part III 82 APPENDIX C 83 Required Format for Annual Compliance Certification Reports 83 APPENDIX D 86 Notification Addresses 86 APPENDIX E 87 Permit Acronyms 87 APPENDIX F 89 Permit Modifications 89 Appendix G 90 Volumetric Flow Rate Equations 90 Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 1. Permitted Activities Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. SECTION I - General Activities and Summary Page 1 1.1 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. is a glass container manufacturing company as defined under Standard Industrial Classification 3221. This facility produces glass containers for various food and beverage industries from raw materials of sand, soda ash, limestone, and from recycled glass called cullet. This facility's permitted emission points consist of two (2) custom built glass melting furnaces, two (2) refiners, four (4) annealing lehrs, four (4) forming machines, four (4) hot end surface treatment (HEST) systems, three (3) backup diesel generators, three (3) carton printing systems, three (3) hot glue systems, four (4) cold end spray systems, two (2) cooling towers, three (3) batch house dust collectors vented to the unloading enclosure, thirty-three (33) batch house dust collectors vented internally to the batch house, one (1) automatic blank lubrication system, and fugitive emissions from the cutlet storage piles, rail car unloading, truck unloading, and haul roads. This facility is located at 11133 Eastman Park Drive, Windsor, CO 80550. This facility is located in an area classified as attainment for all pollutants except ozone. It is classified as non -attainment for the 8 -hr Ozone Control Area as defined in Regulation No. 7, Section II.A.1. Wyoming is an affected state within 50 miles (mi) of the facility. Rocky Mountain National Park is a Federal Class I designated area within 100 kilometers (km) of the facility. 1.2 Until such time as this permit expires or is modified or revoked, the permittee is allowed to discharge air pollutants from this facility in accordance with the requirements, limitations, and conditions of this permit. 1 .3 The Operating Permit incorporates the applicable requirements contained in the underlying construction permits, and does not affect those applicable requirements, except as modified during review of the application or as modified subsequent to permit issuance using the modification procedures found in Regulation No. 3, Part C. These Part C procedures meet all applicable substantive New Source Review requirements of Part B. Any revisions made using the provisions of Regulation No. 3, Part C shall become new applicable requirements for purposes of this Operating Permit and shall survive reissuance. This permit incorporates the applicable requirements (except as noted in Section II) from the following construction permits: 03WE1151 (Facility Wide Construction Permit) 12WE1354 (Construction Permit for Internal Combustion Engine) 1.4 All conditions in this permit are enforceable by US Environmental Protection Agency, Colorado Air Pollution Control Division (hereinafter Division) and its agents, and citizens unless otherwise specified. State -only enforceable conditions are: Permit Condition Number(s): Section IV - Conditions 3.g (last paragraph), 14 & 18 (as noted). 1.5 All information gathered pursuant to the requirements of this permit is subject to the Recordkeeping and Reporting requirements listed under Condition 22 of the General Conditions in Section IV of this permit. Either electronic or hard copy records are acceptable. Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Page 2 2. Alternative Operating Scenarios 2.1 The permittee shall be allowed to make the following changes to its method of operation without applying for a revision of this permit. 2.1 .1 No alternative operating scenarios have been specified. 3. Non -Attainment New Source Review and Prevention of Significant Deterioration 3.1 This facility is categorized as a Non -Attainment New Source Review (NANSR) major stationary source (Potential to Emit of NOx > 100 Tons/Year). Future modifications at this facility resulting in a significant net emissions increase (see Colorado Regulation No. 3, Part D, Sections II.A.27 and 44) for NOx or a modification which is major by itself (i.e. a Potential to Emit of≥ 100 TPY of either NOx or VOC) may result in the application of the NANSR review requirements. Raced nn the informatinn provided by the annliennt thie cnnrre is rate.onrived ac a minor ctatinnary source for Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) as of the issuance date of this permit. Any future modification which is major by itself (Potential to Emit of NOx > 250) for any pollutant listed in Colorado Regulation No. 3, Part D, Section II.A.44 for which the area is in attainment or attainment/maintenance may result in the application of the PSD review requirements. 3.2 There are no other Operating Permits associated with this facility for the purposes of determining applicability of Prevention of Significant Deterioration regulations. 4. Accidental Release Prevention Program (112(r)) 4.1 Based on the information provided by the applicant, this facility is not subject to the provisions of the Accidental Release Prevention Program (Section 112(r) of the Federal Clean Air Act). 5. Compliance Assurance Monitoring (CAM) 5.1 The following emission points at this facility use a control device to achieve compliance with an emission limitation or standard to which they are subject and have pre -control emissions that exceed or are equivalent to the major source threshold. They are therefore subject to the provisions of the CAM program as set forth in 40 CFR Part 64, as adopted by reference in Colorado Regulation No. 3, Part C, Section XIV: Point 001 and 002 for PM and SO2 — Points 001 and 002 both have pre -control emissions of particulate matter (PM) and sulfur dioxide (SO2) that exceed major source thresholds. The initial operating permit application was submitted after April 20, 1998, but none of the emission units are Large Pollutant Specific Emission Units as defined under 40 CFR Part 64. The applicant is not required to submit a CAM plan for these emission sources until the operating permit is renewed. Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 6. Summary of Emission Units 6.1 The emissions units regulated by this permit are the following: Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Page 3 Facility ID AIRS ID Description Pollution Control Commenced Operation Date Furnace A 00I One (1) O -I Custom Built Natural Gas Glass Melting Furnace, rated at 57.35 MMBtu/hr SN. N/A Electrostatic Precipitator Dry Scrubber 09/2005 Furnace B 002 One (1) O -I Custom Built Natural Gas Glass Melting Furnace, rated at 57.35 MMBtu/hr SN. N/A Electrostatic Precipitator Dry Scrubber 08/2005 Refiners 003 Two (2) O -I Custom Built Refiners, rated at 10.58 MMBtu/hr combined SN. N/A None 08/2005 Annealing Lehrs 006 Four (4) Bomana 216" x 112' Gas Annealing Lehrs, rated at 32.0 MMBtu/hr combined SN. 11-5381 SN. 11-5382 SN. 11-5383 SN. 11-5384 None 08/2005 Forming Machines 008 Five (5) O-1 Custom Built Glass Forming Machines SN. IS-2LSG-0021 SN. IS-2LSG-0022 SN. 1S-2LSG-0023 SN. 1S-2LSG-0024 None 08/2005 HEST 's 009 Four (4) Hot End Surface Treatment (HEST) Systems SN: C5S 13001 SN. C5S 13002 SN. C5S 13003 SN. C5S 13004 SN. C5S 13006 None 08/2005 Diesel Backup Generator A 011 One (1) Caterpillar 3412CDITA Diesel Fired Compression Ignition Emergency Generator, Site Rated at 823 HP SN. AFE 00662 None 08/2005 Diesel Backup Generator B 012 One (1) Caterpillar 3412CDITA Diesel Fired Compression Ignition Emergency Generator, Site Rated at 823 HP SN. AFE 00661 None 08/2005 Carton Printing 015 Three (3) Marsh VJ Patrion Plus Carton Printing, Three (3) Nordson PRO Blue Hot Glue, and Four (4) O -I Custom Built Cold End Spray None 08/2005 SN. 05186 101 I WD SN. AN05C00023 SN. 20050501 SN. 05187 10I 0WD SN. AN05C00022 SN. 20050502 SN. 05187 1011 WD SN. AN05C00021 SN. 20050503 Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Page 4 Facility ID AIRS ]D Description Pollution Control Commenced Operation Date SN. 20050504 Mould Shop 017 Mould Shop One ( I ) Dust Collector 01/2005 Cooling Towers 018 Two (2) Cooling Towers — One (1) for Furnace A & B, One (1) for all Systems SN. NC -247998 -Al SN. NC -247998-A2 None 08/2005 BH DC B 019 Three (3) Batch House Dust Collectors Model: SN: Three (3) Pulse Jet Dust Collectors 08/2005 I00WSBS100HTG 30747 100WSBS100ITTG 30747 84BVTS36TTIG 30752 BHDC's _A _ ,C -I 020 Thirty -Three (33) Batch House Dust Collectors Model: SN: Thirty -Three (33) Pulse Jet Dust Collectors 08/2005 58BVTS2511G 30751 (24 Units) 5813V fS9IIG 30750 (2 Units) 58BVTS25BG 30748 (1 Unit) 58BVT525BG 30749 (6 Units) Fugitive Dust Sources 021 Fugitive Dust Sources: Cutlet Storage Piles, Rail Car Unloading, Truck Unloading, and Haul Roads SN. N/A None 08/2005 Warehouse Generator 024 one (1) raterpillnr C9 Dirhoehnrgerl Diesel Fired Compression Ignition Emergency Generator, Site Rated at 457 HP SN. G5A0448I None 08/01/2011 Automatic Blank Lubrication System 025 Automatic Blank Lubrication System None 10/20/2015 Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. SECTION II - Specific Permit Terms Page 5 1. Point 001 and 002 — Two (2) O-1 Custom Built Natural Gas Glass Melting Furnaces, Each Rated at 57.35 MMBtu/hr Parameter Permit Condition Number Limitation - Compliance Emission Factor Monitoring Method Interval NOx 1.1 194.6 tons per year CEM Continuous Emission Monitor Continuous SO2 125.6 tons per year CO 31.4 tons per year 0.2 lbs per ton Recordkeeping and Twelve Month Rolling Calculation Monthly VOC 31.4 tons per year 0.2 lbs per ton PM, PM10, and PA. s 1.1 and 1.6 70.6 tons per year 0.45 lbs per ton Recordkeeping and Twelve Month Rolling Calculation; EPA Reference Methods or Other Division Approved Method Monthl y and Once Every Years Stack Test5 Glass Production (pull rate) 1.2 313,900 tons per year Recordkeeping and Twelve Month Rolling Calculation Daily Bottles Produced I .3 Recordkeeping Daily Hours of Operation 1.3 Bottle Weight 1.5 Recordkeeping Monthly Particulate 1.7 21.49 lbs per hour per furnace Recordkeeping and Calculation Once per Stack Test Opacity 1.8 Less than or Equal to 20% EPA Method 9 Quarterly For Startup — Not to Exceed 30% for a Period or Periods more than 6 minutes in any 60 consecutive minutes Annually Sulfur Dioxide 1.9 2.0 tons SO2 per day Recordkeeping itioonnand Calculation Annually Control Device Operations 1.14 See Condition 1.14 See Condition 1.14 Continuous Emission Monitoring Requirements 1.12 and 1.13 See Condition 1.12 and 1.13 40 CFR 60 (NSPS) Subpart CC Requirements 1.10 0.2 lbs particulate per ton glass produced See Condition 1.10 40 CFR 60 (NSPS) Subpart A Requirements 1.11 See Condition 1.11 Notes: All requirements apply to the two (2) furnaces combined unless stated differently. Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 1.1 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Page 6 All Nitrogen Oxide (NOx), Carbon Monoxide (CO), Sulfur Dioxide (SO2), Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC), Particulate Matter (PM, PM10, and PM25), and Non -Condensable Particulate Matter (PM, PMIo, and PM25) emissions shall not exceed the limitations specified in the table above (Colorado Construction Permit 03WE1151, as modified under the provisions of Section 1, Condition 1.3). Monthly emissions shall be calculated using the conditions below. 1.1.1 Total Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) and Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) emissions shall be monitored monthly using data from the Continuous Emission Monitoring System (CEMS) as required in Conditions 1.12 and 1.13. 1.1.2 Carbon Monoxide (CO) and Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC emissions shall be determined for each individual furnace using the emission factors in the table above and the monthly glass production as required in Condition 1.2 in the equation below. Particulate Matter (PM, PM10, and PM2 5) emissions shall be determined for each individual furnace using the emission factors established from the most recently Division approved stack test as required in Condition 1.6 and the monthly glass production as required in Condition 1.2 in the equation below. CO, VOC, PM, I tons Emission Factor rlbsl x Glass Produced ( tons l PMl & PMz s (—ton) ntonthl Emissions month/ 2000 /Ibsl ton A control percent of eighty percent (80%) can be applied to PM and Non -Condensable PM emissions for use of the Electrostatic Precipitator. Please note that the emission factor in the table above includes the 80% control. 1.1.3 Compliance with the annual emission limitations shall be determined by adding the monthly emissions for each pollutant from each furnace together. Monthly emissions shall be used in a twelve month rolling total to monitor compliance with the annual emission limitations. Each month, a new twelve month total shall be calculated using the previous twelve month's total. 1.2 Glass production (pull rate) shall not exceed the annual limitation specified in the table above (Colorado Construction Permit 03WE1151, as provided for under Section 1, Condition 1.3). Daily calculation of glass produced (pull rate) by each furnace shall be calculated using the number of bottles produced per hour as specified in Condition 1.3, the weight of the bottles produced, and the hours of operation per day as specified in Condition 1.3 in the equation below: Glass ( tons l (bottles) ton l Production \month/ Bottles Produced ( hour f x Weight of Bottle (bottle) x Hours o f Operation (hour.\ x Days in Month (- `!"v` ) day I oath Daily glass production (pull rate) shall be summed together to determine the monthly glass production (pull rate) from each furnace, which will be used to calculate emissions as required in Condition 1.1. Compliance with the annual limitation shall be determined by adding the monthly production (pull rate) from each furnace together. Monthly glass production (pull rate) shall be used in a twelve month rolling Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Page 7 total to monitor compliance with the annual emission limit. Each month, a new twelve month total shall be calculated using the previous twelve month's total. 1.3 The number of glass bottles produced each day shall be monitored and recorded on a monthly basis to determine compliance with the annual glass production (pull rate) limitation in Condition 1.2. The records shall be maintained and made available to the Division review upon request. 1.4 The hours of operation of the furnaces shall be monitored and recorded on a daily basis to determine compliance with the annual glass production (pull rate) limitation in Condition 1.2. The records shall be maintained and made available to the Division review upon request. 1.5 The weight of the bottle the facility is producing shall be recorded each month to determine compliance with the annual glass production (pull rate) limitation in Condition 1.2. The records shall be maintained and made available to the Division review upon request. 1.6 A compliance test shall be conducted on the glass melting furnaces to measure the emission rates of condensable and non -condensable (filterable) PM, PMto, and PM2 5 in order to monitor compliance with the annual emission limits found in Condition 1.1. For the purposes of assessing compliance with the annual emission limitations in Condition 1.1, the results of the performance tests shall be converted to a pounds per ton (lbs/ton) basis, and multiplied by the allowable glass production (pull rate) for the year as specified in Condition 1.2. The glass production (pull rate) shall be recorded during the performance tests and shall be used in conjunction with the test results to determine the PM, PM10, and PM2s emission factors (lbs/ton). The emission factors determined during the performance tests shall be compared to the emission factors specified in the permit. If the performance test shows that the PM, PM10, and PM2 5 emission factors/rates are greater than the relevant emission factors specified in the permit, and in the absence of subsequent testing results to the contrary (as approved by the Division), the permittee shall apply for a modification to this permit to reflect, at a minimum, the higher emission factor/rate within sixty (60) days of completion of the performance test. Testing shall be performed using appropriate EPA Reference Methods to measure both filterable and condensable particulate matter. Testing shall be conducted within 180 days of issuance of this Operating Permit [DATE] and again every five years thereafter. Please note that the emission factor/rate (lbs/ton) established during the Division approved performance tests shall be used in the monthly emission calculation proceeding the test for PM, PM10, and PM25 as required in Condition 1.1.2 and a modification to this permit is not required as long as the emission factor/rate (lbs/ton) established in the Division approved performance test is equal to or less than the emission factor/rate used to establish the PM, PM1o, and PM2.5 emission limitations specified in the table above. Testing shall be conducted to monitor emission under all ESP operating modes: all three (3) fields in operation, two (2) of the three (3) fields in operation, and one (1) of the three (3) fields in operation. The test protocol, test, and test report must be in accordance with the requirements of the APCD Compliance Test Manual (httpsJ/www.colorado.eov/pacific/cdphe/inspections-and-enforcement). A stack testing protocol shall be submitted for Division approval at least forty-five (45) calendar days prior to any performance of the test required under this condition. No stack test required herein shall be Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Page 8 performed without prior approval of the protocol by the Division. The Division reserves the right to witness the test. In order to facilitate the Division's ability to make plans to witness the test, notice of the date(s) for the stack test shall be submitted to the Division at least thirty (30) calendar days prior to the test. The Division may for good cause shown, waive the thirty (30) day notice requirement. In instances when a scheduling conflict is presented, the Division shall immediately contact the permittee in order to explore the possibility of making modifications to the stack test schedule. The compliance test results shall be submitted to the Division within forty-five (45) calendar days of the completion of the test unless a longer period is approved by the Division. 1.7 Each Furnace is subject to the Colorado Regulation Number 1 Emission Control Regulations for Particulate Matter for the State of Colorado, Particulate Matter for Manufacturing Processes, Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section I1I.C as follows: 1.7.1 No owner or operator of a manufacturing process unit shall cause or permit emission of any particulate matter into the atmosphere during any consecutive sixty minute period which is in excess of the following: 1.7.1.1 For process equipment of process weight rates of 30 tons per hour or less, the allowable emission rate shall be monitored by use of the equation: E = 3.59(P)o.62 Where: E = The Allowable Particulate Emissions in lbs/hr = 21.49 per furnace lbs/hr P = The Process Weight Rate in tons/hr = 17.92 tons/hr In absence of credible evidence to the contrary, compliance with the Particulate Matter Emission limitation shall be monitored by maintaining a record of a calculation demonstrating compliance with the limitation using the combination of the emission rates from the most recent PM stack test as required in Condition 1.6. The record of calculation shall be updated each time a new stack test is conducted with the new PM emission rate. A copy of the calculation shall be maintained and made available for Division review upon request. 1.8 The furnaces are subject to the following opacity requirements: 1.8.1 Except as provided for in Condition 1.8.2 below, no owner or operator of a source shall allow or cause the emission into the atmosphere of any air pollutant which is in excess of twenty percent (20%) opacity (Colorado Construction Permit 03 WE1151, as provided for under the provisions of Section T, Condition 1.3). 1.8.2 No owner or operator of a source shall allow or cause to be emitted into the atmosphere any air pollutant resulting from startup, process modification, or adjustment of control equipment which is in excess of thirty percent (30%) opacity for a period or periods aggregating more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) consecutive minutes (Colorado Construction Permit 03WE1151, as provided for under the provisions of Section i, Condition 1.3). 11 Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Page 9 Compliance with these limitations shall be monitored by conducting visual emission observations in accordance with EPA Reference Method 9 as follows: 1.8.3 Compliance with the opacity standard in Condition l .8.lshall be monitored by conducting quarterly visible emission observations in accordance with EPA Method 9. Such opacity observations shall be conducted within 24 hours of completion of any specific activity identified in Condition 1.8.2, if such an activity occurs during the quarterly period. 1.8.4 Compliance with the opacity standard in Condition 1.8.2 shall be monitored by conducting visible emission observations in accordance with EPA Method 9, annually. This opacity observation shall be taken within one (1) hour of the commencement of any of the specific activities identified in Condition 1.8.2 and every 24 hours thereafter until that activity is completed. A visible emission observation is not required for any annual period where no specific activities identified in Condition 1.8.2 have occurred. 1.8.5 Subject to the provisions of C.R.S 25-7-123.1 and in the absence of credible evidence to the contrary, exceedance of the opacity limit shall be considered to exist from the time a Method 9 reading is taken that shows an exceedance of the opacity limit until a Method 9 reading is taken that shows the opacity is less than the opacity limit. 1.8.6 All opacity observations shall be performed by an observer with a current and valid Method 9 certification. Results of Method 9 readings and a copy of the certified Method 9 reader's certificate shall be kept on site and made available to the Division review upon request. 1.9 The furnaces are subject to the Colorado Regulation Number 1 Emission Control Regulations for Sulfur Oxides for the State of Colorado, Sulfur Dioxide Emission Regulations, Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section VI.B as follows: 1.9.1 New sources of sulfur dioxide not specifically regulated shall not emit or cause to be emitted sulfur dioxide in excess of the following process -specific limitations (Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section Vi.B.5). 1.9.1.1 Limit emissions to not more than two (2) tons per day of sulfur dioxide, or In absence of credible evidence to the contrary, compliance with the sulfur dioxide emission limitation shall be monitored by maintaining a record of a calculation demonstrating compliance with the limitation. A copy of the calculation shall be maintained and made available for Division review upon request. 1.10 This source is subject to the New Source Performance Standards requirements of Regulation No. 6, Part A, Subpart CC (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart CC), for Glass Manufacturing Plants, including, but not limited to, the following: The requirements below reflect the current rule language as of the revisions to 40 CFR Part 60 Subpart CC published in the Federal Register on 10/17/2000. However, if revisions to this Subpart are published Operating Permit 06OPWE289 issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Page 10 at a later date, the owner or operator is subject to the requirements contained in the revised version of 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart CC. §60.292 Standards for particulate matter 1.10.1 §60.292(a) — On and after the date which the performance test required to be conducted by §60.8 is completed, no owner or operator of a glass melting furnace subject to the provisions of this subpart shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere - 1.10.1.1 §60.292(1) — From any glass melting furnace fired exclusively with a gaseous fuel, particulate matter at a emission rate exceeding 0.1 gram of particulate per kg of glass produced (0.2 lb of particulate per ton of glass produced) (Table CC -1, Emission Rates). 1.10.2 §60.292(e) — During routine maintenance of add-on pollution controls, an owner or operator of a glass melting furnace subject to the provisions of paragraph (a) (Condition 1.10.1) of this section is exempt from the provisions of paragraph (a) (Condition 1.10.1) of this section if: 1.10.2.1 §60.292(e)(1) — Routine maintenance in each calendar year does not exceed 6 days; 1.10.2.2 §60.292(e)(2) — Routine maintenance is conducted in a manner consistent with good air pollution control practices for minimizing emissions; and §60.292(e)(3) — A report is submitted to the Administrator 10 da'y's before the start of the routine maintenance (if 10 days cannot be provided, the report must be submitted as soon as practicable) and the report contains an explanation of the schedule of the maintenance. I Inn, 1. 1 V.L i ¢'60.296 lest methods and procedures 1.10.3 §60.296(a) — If a glass melting furnace with modified processes is changed to one without modified processes or if a glass melting furnace without modified processes is changed to one with modified processes, the owner or operator shall notify the Administrator at least 60 days before the change is scheduled to occur. 1.10.4 §60.296(c) — In conducting the performance tests required in §60.8, the owner or operator shall use reference methods and procedures the test methods in Appendix A of this part of other methods and procedures as specified in this section, except as provided in §60.8(b). 1.10.5 §60.296(d) — The owner or operator shall determine compliance with the particulate matter standards in §§60.292 (Conditions 1.10.1) per §60.296(d)(1) through §60.296(d)(4). Points 001 and 002 are subject to the requirements in 40 CFR Part 60 Subpart A "General Provisions", as adopted by reference in Colorado Regulation No. 6, Part A, Subpart A. These requirements include, but are not limited to the following: 1.11.1 §60.7 — Notification and recordkeeping Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. 1.11.2 §60.8 — Performance tests 1.11.3 §60.11 — Compliance with standards and maintenance requirements 1.11.4 §60.12 — Circumvention Page 11 1.12 A Continuous Emission Rate Monitoring System (CERMS) shall be installed, operated, calibrated, and maintained to accurately measure and record emissions of Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) and Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) being emitted from the furnaces. The CEMS shall measure and record the following: 1.12.1 Hourly emission rates of NOx and SO2 in pounds per ton of glass pulled. 1.12.2 Hourly concentration of NOx and SO2 in ppmv. 1.12.3 Emissions of NOx and SO2 in pounds per hour, tons per month, and tons per rolling twelve month periods. 1.12.4 Volumetric flow rate in standard cubic feet per hour (scth) for natural gas as specified in Appendix G. 1.12.5 Natural gas flow rate in standard cubic feet per hour (scfh). 1.12.6 Operating mode — startup, shutdown, and/or standard operation. 1.12.7 Hourly concentration of CO2 in percent (%) volume. The continuous emission monitoring system shall meet the requirements of Condition 1.13. Monthly emissions of NOx and SO2 from the CERMS shall be used as specified in Condition 1.1 to monitor compliance with the annual NOx and SO2 emission limitation. 1.13 The Continuous Emission Monitoring System is subject to the following requirements: 1.13.1 Equipment QA/QC Requirements. 1.13.1.1 The CEMS shall meet, at a minimum, the requirements in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix B for performance specifications and Appendix F for the quality assurance procedures and 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart A, §60.13. 1.13.1.2 Relative Accuracy Test Audits (RATA): RATAs shall be conducted annually for the NOx, CO2, SO2, and flow. The RATA test procedures shall follow those required for initial certification in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix B, Performance Specification 2, 3, and 6 where applicable. 1.13.1.3 The quality assurance/ quality control plan for the NOx, CO2, SO2, and flow shall be in accordance with the requirements of the current version of the Air Pollution Control Division's Guidelines for Continuous Monitoring Systems in the State of Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Page 12 Colorado. The procedures shall, at a minimum, comply with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix B and Appendix F as applicable. The plan shall be made available to the Division review upon request. 1.13.2 General Provisions 1.13.2.1 The permittee shall ensure that all continuous emission monitoring systems are operating and monitoring unit emissions at all times except for monitoring system breakdowns, repairs, calibration checks and zero and span adjustments required under 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart A, §60.13(d) and §60.13(e). 1.13.2.2 Alternative monitoring systems, alternative reference methods, or any other alternatives for the required continuous emission monitoring systems shall not be used without having obtained prior written approval from the appropriate agency, either the Division or the U.S. EPA, depending on which agency is authorized to approve such alternative under applicable law, Any alternative continuous emission monitoring systems must be certified in accordance with the applicable requirements of 40 CFR Part 60. 1.13.2.3 All test and monitoring equipment, methods, procedures and reporting shall be subject to the review and approval by the appropriate agency, either the Division or the U.S. EPA, depending on which agency is authorized to approve such item under applicable law, prior to any official use. The Division shall have the right to inspect such equipment, methods and procedures and data obtained at any time. The Division may provide a witness(s) for any and all tests as Division resources permit. 1 132.4 A file suitable for inspection shall be maintained of all measurements, including continuous monitoring system, monitoring device, and performance testing measurements; all continuous monitoring system performance evaluations; all continuous monitoring system or monitoring device calibration checks; adjustments and maintenance performed on these systems or devices; and all other information required by applicable portions of 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart A, Appendix B, and Appendix F. 1.13.2.5 Records shall be maintained of the occurrence and duration of any startup, shutdown, or malfunction in the operation of the source; any malfunction of the air pollution control equipment; or any periods during which a continuous monitoring system or monitoring device is inoperative (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart A, §60.7(b)). 1.13.3 Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements 1.13.3.1 The owner or operator of a facility required to install, maintain, and calibrate continuous monitoring equipment shall submit to the Division, by the end of the calendar month following the end of each calendar quarter, a report of excess emissions for all pollutants monitored for that quarter (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart A, §60.7(c)). This report shall consist of the following information and/or reporting requirements as specified by the Division: Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Page 13 a. The magnitude of excess emissions computed in accordance with 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart A, §60.13(h), any conversion factor(s) used, and the date and time of commencement and completion of each time period of excess emissions and the process operating time during the reporting period (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart A, §60.7(e)(1)). b. Specific identification of each period of excess emissions that occurs during startups, shutdowns, and malfunctions of the affected facility. The nature and cause of any malfunction (if known), the corrective action taken or preventative measures adopted (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart A, §60.7(c)(2)). c. The date and time identifying each period during which the continuous monitoring system was inoperative except for zero and span checks and the nature of the system repairs or adjustments (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart A, §60.7(c)(3)). d. When no excess emissions have occurred or the continuous monitoring system(s) have not been inoperative, repaired, or adjusted, such information shall be stated in the report (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart A, §60.7(c)(4)). 1.13.3.2 The owner or operator of a facility required to install, maintain, and calibrate continuous monitoring equipment shall submit to the Division, by the end of the month following the end of each calendar quarter, a summary report for that quarter (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart A, §60.7(c)). One summary report from shall be submitted for each pollutant monitored. This report shall contain the information and be presented in a format approved by the Division. If the total duration of excess emissions for the reporting period is less than one percent (1%) of the total operating time for the reporting period and continuous monitoring system (CMS) downtime is less than five percent (5%) of the total operating time for the reporting period, only the summary report form shall be submitted unless required by the Division (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart A, §60.7(d)(1). If the total duration of excess emissions for the reporting period is one percent (1%) or greater of the total operating time for the reporting period or the total CMS downtime for the reporting period is five percent (5%) or greater of the total operating time for the reporting period, the summary report form and the excess emission report described in Condition 1.13.3.1 shall both be submitted (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart A, §60.7(d)(1)). 1.14 The Dry Scrubbers shall be continuously monitored by the Furnace Operator in the furnace control room for proper operation of the injection blower and rotary screw. The Electrostatic Precipitators (ESP) shall be continuously monitored by the Furnace Operator in the furnace operator room for proper operation of the field and rapper controls. The ESPs shall be inspected daily for proper operation with at least two (2) of the three (3) fields on each ESP at all times. In the case that only one (1) of the three (3) fields is in operation, the following provisions shall be followed to bring the ESPs back into proper operation (Operation and Maintenance Plan dated 5/24/2016): Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Page 14 1.14.1 Functional troubleshooting using system controls. 1.14.2 Troubleshooting electrical wiring, connections, and other components. 1.14.3 Contacting Owens support staff and/or contracted service providers to restore ESP to normal operating conditions. Records of proper operating inspections and monitoring shall be kept on site and made available for Division review upon request. Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. 2. Point 003 — Two (2) O -I Custom Built Refiners, Rated at 10.58 MMBtu/hr Combined Page 15 Parameter Permit Condition Number Limitation - Compliance Emission Factor Monitoring Method Interval NOx 2.1 4.6 tons per year 0.100 lbs per MMBtu Recordkeeping and Twelve Month Rolling Calculation Monthly CO 3.9 tons per year 0.084 lbs per MMBtu Natural Gas Consumption 2.2 92.7 MMscf per year Opacity 2.3 Less than or Equal to 20% Fuel Restriction Only Natural Gas is Used As Fuel For Startup — Not to Exceed 30% for a Period or Periods more than 6 minutes in any 60 consecutive minutes Particulate 2.4 30.69 lbs per hour Recordkeeping and Calculation Only Natural Gas is Used As Fuel Notes: All requirements apply to the two (2) refiners combined unless stated differently below 2.1 All Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) and Carbon Monoxide (CO) emissions from both refiners combined shall not exceed the limitations stated in the table above (Colorado Construction Permit 03WE1151, as modified under the provisions of Section 1, Condition 1.3). Monthly emissions of each pollutant shall be calculated by the end of each subsequent month using the emission factors above that have been approved by the Division, the monthly natural gas consumption as required by Condition 2.2, and the heating value of the fuel (1,000 Btu/scf) in the equation below: Emissions ibs MMscmoJ MMBsetfu / Emission Factor x MonthlyFuel Use x Heat Content MM ( � nth nmonti! 2000 lbs) A twelve month rolling total of emissions shall be maintained to monitor compliance with the annual emission limitations. Each month, a new twelve month total shall be calculated using the previous twelve month's data. 2.2 Natural gas consumption, for both refiners combined, shall not exceed the limitation stated above (Colorado Construction Permit 03WE1151, as provided for under the provisions of Section I, Condition 1.3). Natural gas consumption shall be recorded monthly in a log made available for the Division review upon request for both refiners by using the fuel meter for each refiner and then adding the natural gas consumption for each refiner together. A twelve month rolling total shall be maintained to monitor compliance with the annual limitation. Each month, a new twelve month total shall be calculated using the previous twelve month's data. Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Page 16 2.3 Visible emissions for each refiner shall not exceed twenty percent (20%) opacity except during periods of startup when visible emissions shall not exceed thirty percent (30%) opacity for a period or periods more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) consecutive minutes (Colorado Construction Permit 03WE1151, as provided for under the provisions of Section 1, Condition 1.3). In absence of credible evidence to the contrary, compliance with the opacity limit shall be presumed since only natural gas is permitted to be used as fuel for the refiners. The permittee shall maintain records that verify that only natural gas is used as fuel. 2.4 The refiners are subject to the Regulation Number 1 Emission Control Regulations for Particulate Matter for the State of Colorado, Particulate Matter for Manufacturing Processes, Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section 111.C as follows: 2.4.1 No owner or operator of a manufacturing process unit shall cause or permit emission of any particulate matter into the atmosphere during any consecutive sixty minute period which is in excess of the following: 2.4.1.1 For process equipment of process weight rates equal to or greater than 30 tons per hour, the allowable emission ratc shall be monitored by use of the equation: E = 17.31(p)°16 Where: E = The Allowable Particulate Emissions in lbs/hr = 30.69 lbs/hr P = The Process Weight Rate in tons/hr = 35.83 tons/hr i�:etethat the numeric Standard lb. iii:: / "timed re :lief _ '"tioi, vy as deieLmined using the process weight rate of total glass production (35.83 tons of glass produced per hour). In absence of credible evidence to the contrary, compliance with the Particulate Matter Emission limitation is presumed since only Natural Gas is permitted to be used as fuel in these refiners. Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. 3. Point 006 — Four (4) Bowman Annealing Lehrs, Rated at 32.0 MMBtu/hr Combined Page 17 Parameter Permit Condition Number Limitation Compliance Emission Factor Monitoring Method Interval NOx 3.1 14.0 tons per year 0.100 lbs per MMBtu Recordkeeping and Twelve Month Rolling Calculation Monthly CO 11.8 tons per year 0.084 lbs per MMBtu Natural Gas Consumption 3 2 280.4 MMscf per year Opacity g g Less than or Equal to 20% Fuel Restriction Only Natural Gas is Used As Fuel For Startup — Not to Exceed 30% for a Period or Periods more than 6 minutes in any 60 consecutive minutes Particulate 3.4 30.69 lbs per hour Recordkeeping and Calculation Only Natural Gas is used as Fuel Notes: All requirements apply to the four (4) annealing lehrs combined unless stated differently below 3.1 All Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) and Carbon Monoxide (CO) emissions from all four (4) annealing lehrs combined shall not exceed the limitations stated in the table above (Colorado Construction Permit 03WE1151, as modified under the provisions of Section 1, Condition 1.3). Monthly emissions of each pollutant shall be calculated by the end of each subsequent month using the emission factors above that have been approved by the Division, the monthly natural gas consumption as required by Condition 3.2, and the heating value of the fuel (1,000 Btu/set) in the equation below. Emission Factor ibs x MonthlyFuel Use MNl sc/ x Heat Content MMstu tons �N1MBtu� �mon[!t� �MMscfl Emissions l month) 2000 ( ton A twelve month rolling total of emissions shall be maintained to monitor compliance with the annual emission limitation. Each month a new twelve month total shall be calculated using the previous twelve months data. 3.2 Natural gas consumption for all four (4) annealing lehrs combined shall not exceed the limitation stated above (Colorado Construction Permit 03WE1151, as provided for under the provisions of Section I, Condition 1.3). Natural gas consumption shall be recorded monthly in a log made available for the Division review upon request for all four (4) annealing lehrs by using the fuel meter for each annealing lehr and then adding the natural gas consumption for each annealing lehr together. A twelve month rolling total shall be maintained to monitor compliance with the annual limitation. Each month, a new twelve month total shall be calculated using the previous twelve month's data. Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Page 18 3.3 Visible emissions for each annealing lehr shall not exceed twenty percent (20%) opacity except during periods of startup when visible emissions shall not exceed thirty percent (30%) opacity for a period or periods more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) consecutive minutes (Colorado Construction Permit 03WE1151, as provided for under the provisions of Section I, Condition 1.3). In absence of credible evidence to the contrary, compliance with the opacity limit shall be presumed since only natural gas is permitted to be used as fuel for these units. The permittee shall maintain records that verify that only natural gas is used as fuel. 3.4 The annealing lehrs are subject to the Regulation Number 1 Emission Control Regulations for Particulate Matter for the State of Colorado, Particulate Matter for Manufacturing Processes, Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section I11.C as follows: 3.4.1 No owner or operator of a manufacturing process unit shall cause or permit emission of any particulate matter into the atmosphere during any consecutive sixty minute period which is in CAUCSS of the follow ing: 3.4.1.1 For process equipment of process weight rates equal to or greater than 30 tons per hour, the allowable emission rate shall be monitored by use of the equation: E = 17.31(P)o.lb Where: E = The Allowable Particulate Emissions in lbs/hr = 30.69 lbs/hr P = The Process Weight Rate in tons/hr = 35.83 tons/hr Nnte that the mlmerir etanrlarrl fnr the rnmhinerl annealing Lehr nneratinn vac determined using the process weight rate of total glass production (35.83 tons of glass produced per hour). In absence of credible evidence to the contrary, compliance with the Particulate Matter Emission limitation is presumed since only Natural Gas is permitted to be used as fuel in these annealing lehrs. Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 4. Point 008 — Four (4) O -I Custom Built Forming Machines Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Page 19 Parameter Permit Condition Number Limitation Compliance Emission Factor Monitoring Method Interval PM 4.1 24.3 tons per year 3.65 lbs per gal Recordkeeping and Twelve Month Rolling Calculation Monthly SO2 5.6 tons per year 0.833 lbs per gal VOC 2.0 tons per year 0.292 lbs per gal Opacity 4.2 Less than or Equal to 20% EPA Method 22 Every Six (6) Months For Startup — Not to Exceed 30% for a Period or Periods more than 6 minutes in any 60 consecutive minutes Mould Lubricant Oil Consumption 4.3 55.6 tons per year Recordkeeping Monthly Particulate 4.4 30.69 lbs per hour Recordkeeping and Calculation Annually Sulfur Dioxide 4.5 2.0 tons SO2 per day Recordkeeping and Calculation Annually Notes: All requirements apply to the four (4) forming machines combined unless stated differently below. 4.1 All Particulate Matter (PM), Sulfur Dioxide (SO2), and Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) emissions from all four (4) forming machines combined shall not exceed the limitations stated in the table above (Colorado Construction Permit 03WE1151, as modified under the provisions of Section 1, Condition 1.3). Monthly emissions of each pollutant shall be calculated by the end of each subsequent month using the above emission factors that have been approved by the Division and the monthly mould lubricant consumption as required by Condition 4.3 in the equation below. Emission Factor lbs x LubricantConsumption gat Emissions (tons ) (,gal) (month) month 2000 H) A twelve month rolling total of emissions shall be maintained to monitor compliance with the annual emission limitations. Each month, a new twelve month total shall be calculated using the previous twelve month's data. 4.2 Opacity of emissions shall not exceed the following: 4.2.1 Except as provided for in Condition 4.2.2 below, no owner or operator of a source shall allow or cause the emission into the atmosphere of any air pollutant which is in excess of twenty percent Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 Owens -Brockway Glass Container inc. Page 20 (20%) opacity (Colorado Construction Permit 03WE1151, as provided for under the provisions of Section I, Condition 1.3 and Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section II.A1). Compliance with the opacity limitation in Condition 4.2.1 shall be monitored by conducting a visual emission observation in accordance with EPA Reference Method 22, once every six (6) months. If visible emissions arc observed, an inspection on the emission unit shall be conducted within twenty four (24) hours from when the visible emissions were observed. The source shall then perform any maintenance on the emission unit as necessary in a timely manner. A log of observations, inspections, and maintenance performed shall be maintained and made available to the Division review upon request. 4.2.2 No owner or operator of a source shall allow or cause to be emitted into the atmosphere any air pollutant resulting from startup, process modification, or adjustment of control equipment which is in excess of thirty percent (30%) opacity for a period or periods aggregating more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) consecutive minutes (Colorado Construction Permit 03WE1151, as provided for under the provisions of Section 1, Condition 1.3 and Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section II.A.4). Compliance with the opacity limitation in Condition 4.2.2 shall be monitored by conducting a visual emission observation in accordance with EPA Reference Method 22, once every six (6) months. This visible emission observation shall be taken within one (1) hour of the rnmmenrement nf any nf the cnerifir artivitiec irlentifieri in Condition d 7 1 and every twenty four (24) hours thereafter until that activity is completed. If visible emissions are observed, an inspection of the emission unit shall be conducted within twenty four (24) hours from when the vigil -de Pmiccinnc were nhcrrvr_ri The cnnree chap then perform any mnintennnee nn the pmi ecinn unit as necessary in a timely manner. A log of observations, inspections, and maintenance performed shall be maintained and made available to the Division review upon request. A visible emission observation is not required for any six (6) month period where no specific activities identified in Condition 4.2.2 have occurred. 4.3 Mould lubricant oil consumption shall not exceed the limitations stated above (Colorado Construction Permit 03WE1151, as provided for under the provisions of Section I, Condition 1.3). Monthly consumption shall be monitored and recorded on a monthly basis and made available to the Division review upon request. A twelve month rolling total shall be maintained for demonstration of compliance with the annual limitation. Each month, a new twelve month total shall be calculated using the previous twelve month's data. 4.4 The forming machines are subject to the Regulation Number 1 Emission Control Regulations for Particulate Matter for the State of Colorado, Particulate Matter for Manufacturing Processes, Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section III.C as follows: Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Page 21 4.4.1 No owner or operator of a manufacturing process unit shall cause or permit emission of any particulate matter into the atmosphere during any consecutive sixty minute period which is in excess of the following: 4.4.1.1 For process equipment of process weight rates equal to or greater than 30 tons per hour, the allowable emission rate shall be monitored by use of the equation: E = 17.31(P)°•16 Where: E = The Allowable Particulate Emissions in lbs/hr = 30.69 lbs/hr P = The Process Weight Rate in tons/hr = 35.83 tons/hr Note that the numeric standard for the combined forming machines operation was determined using the process weight rate of total glass production (35.83 tons of glass produced per hour). In absence of credible evidence to the contrary, compliance with the Particulate Matter Emission limitation shall be monitored by maintaining a record of a calculation demonstrating compliance with the limitation. A copy of the calculation shall be maintained and made available for Division review upon request. 4.5 The forming machines, are subject to the Colorado Regulation Number 1 Emission Control Regulations for Sulfur Oxides for the State of Colorado, Sulfur Dioxide Emission Regulations, Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section VLB as follows: 4.5.1 New sources of sulfur dioxide not specifically regulated shall not emit or cause to be emitted sulfur dioxide in excess of the following process -specific limitations (Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section VI.B.5). 4.5.1.1 Limit emissions to not more than two (2) tons per day of sulfur dioxide, or In absence of credible evidence to the contrary, compliance with the sulfur dioxide emission limitation shall be monitored by maintaining a record of a calculation demonstrating compliance with the limitation. A copy of the calculation shall be maintained and made available for Division review upon request. Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Page 22 5. Point 009 — Five (5) Hot End Surface Treatment (HEST) Systems Permit Number Factor Monitoring Method Interval VOC 5.1 24.5 tons per year 0.7 lbs VOC/ lb MBTT Recordkeeping and Twelve Month Rolling Calculation Monthly Monobutyltin Trichloridc Consumption 5.2 70,080 lbs MBTT per year Notes: All requirements apply to the five (5) HEST systems combined unless stated differently below. 5.1 All Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) emissions from all five (5) hot end surface treatment systems combined shall not exceed the limitation stated in the table above (Colorado Construction Permit 03WE1151, as modified under the provisions of Section I, Condition 1.3). Monthly emissions of VOC shall be calculated by the end of each subsequent month using the above emission factor that has been approved by the Division and the monthly mould lubricant consumption as required by Condition 5.2 in the equation below. Emission Factor (lbsvoc / x MBTT Consumption(lbs tons _ vtbs,NIB�7 j morELIO Emissions `monthl Ibs 2000 (ton) iAk twelve month rolling total ..F er.., h _ll be ned t. with the l ... .., ,.,.. t.. ,.6 : .. ....nor .cam maintained ...........compliance .., ., ..,.,.�..., emission limitation. Each month, a new twelve month total shall be calculated using the previous twelve month's data. 5.2 Monobutyltin Trichloride (MBTT) consumption from all five (5) HEST systems shall not exceed the limitation stated in the table above (Colorado Construction Permit 03WEI 151, as provided for under the provisions of Section 1, Condition 1.3). Monthly consumption of MBTT shall be monitored by totes used and recorded on a monthly basis and made available to the Division review upon request. A twelve month rolling total shall be maintained for demonstration of compliance with the annual limitations. Each month, a new twelve month total shall be calculated using the previous twelve month's data. Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Page 23 6. Point 011 and 012— Two (2) Caterpillar 3412CDITA Diesel Fired Compression Ignition Emergency Generators, Each Site Rated at 823 HP Parameter Permit Condition Number Limitation Compliance Emission Factor Monitoring Method Tnterval NOx 6.1 3.7 tons per year 2.66 lbs per MMBtu Recordkeeping and Twelve Month Rolling Calculation Monthly Diesel Fuel Consumption 6.2 Recordkeeping Monthly Hours of Operation 6.3 500 hours per year Recordkeeping Monthly Opacity 6.4 Less than or Equal to 20% EPA Method 9 Annually For Startup — Not to Exceed 30% for a Period or Periods more than 6 minutes in any 60 consecutive minutes 40 CFR 63 (MACT) Subpart ZZZZ Requirements 6.5 See Condition 6.5 See Condition 6.5 Notes: Requirements apply to each engine individually unless specified different y below. 6.1 All Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) emissions from each engine shall not exceed the limitation stated in the table above (Colorado Construction Permit 03 WE1151, as provided for under the provisions of Section I, Condition 1.3). Monthly emissions of NOx shall be calculated by the end of the subsequent month using the above emission factor that has been approved by the Division, the monthly diesel fuel consumption as required in Condition 6.2, and the fuel heating value (0.137 MMBtu/gal) in the equation below: F,,,;ss;.,,, F.,c+.,. fG 1 u n;oeor Fuel Consumption( pat ) ,. Fuel ue.,nm .. v.. r„a (MMRt NOx Emissions ( manta 2000 l Ibs ton A twelve month rolling total of emissions shall be maintained to monitor compliance with the annual emission limitation. Each month, a new twelve month total shall be calculated using the previous twelve month's data. 6.2 Total diesel fuel consumption from each engine shall be monitored and recorded for each calendar month. Diesel fuel consumption from each engine shall be monitored by multiplying the maximum hourly fuel consumption rate of each engine by the hours of operation of each engine for that month. Monthly diesel fuel consumption for each engine shall be used in a running total for each annual compliance period and made available for the Division review upon request. A twelve month rolling total of diesel fuel consumption for each engine shall be used to determine compliance with the annual Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Paae 24 emission limitation in Condition 6.1. Each month, a new twelve month total shall be calculated using the previous twelve month's data. 6.3 The hours of operation for each engine shall not exceed the limitation stated in the table above (Colorado Construction Permit 03WE1151, as provided for under the provisions of Section 1, Condition 1.3). The hours of operation shall be recorded monthly and used to calculate the monthly fuel consumption as required in Condition 6.2. A twelve month rolling total shall be maintained for demonstration of compliance with the annual hours of operation limitation. Each month, a new twelve month total shall be calculated using the previous twelve month's data. The hours of operation shall be made available to the Division review upon request. 6.4 Opacity of emissions shall not exceed the following: 6.4.1 Except as provided for in Condition 6.4.2 below, no owner or operator of a source shall allow or cause the emission into the atmosphere of any air pollutant which is in excess of twenty percent (20%) opacity (Colorado Construction Permit 03 W Ei ID!, as provided for under the provisions of Section I, Condition 1.3 and Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section II.A.1). 6.4.2 No owner or operator of a source shall allow or cause to be emitted into the atmosphere any air pollutant resulting from startup, process modification, or adjustment of control equipment which is in excess of thirty percent (30%) opacity for a period or periods aggregating more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) consecutive minutes (Colorado Construction Permit 03WE1 151, as provided for under the provisions of Section 1, Condition 1.3 and Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section II.A.4). Compliance with these limitations shall be monitored by conducting visual emission observations in accordance h 'LTA Refer,„,,,, Method n follows: al.eu1uaL1I.l VILA L1 A Reference 1vtl.UIuu 7 as follows: 6.4.3 Compliance with the opacity standard in Condition 6.4.2 shall be monitored by conducting visible emission observations in accordance with EPA Method 9, once per calendar year. This opacity observation shall be taken within one (1) hour of the commencement of any of the specific activities identified in Condition 6.4.2 and every 24 hours thereafter until that activity is completed. A visible emission observation is not required for any annual period where no specific activities identified in Condition 6.4.2 have occurred. 6.4.4 An opacity observation shall be conducted annually (calendar year period) to monitor compliance with the opacity limit in Condition 6.4.1. If the engine is operated more than 250 hours in any calendar year period, a second opacity observation shall be conducted. If two opacity readings are conducted in the annual (calendar year) period, such readings shall be conducted at least thirty days (30) apart. if the engine is not operated during the annual (calendar year) period, then no opacity observations is required. Operating Permit 06OPWE2S9 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OP WE289 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Page 25 6.4.5 Subject to the provisions of C.R.S 25-7-123.1 and in the absence of credible evidence to the contrary, exceedance of the opacity limit shall be considered to exist from the time a Method 9 reading is taken that shows an exceedance of the opacity limit until a Method 9 reading is taken that shows the opacity is less than the opacity limit. 6.4.6 All opacity observations shall be performed by an observer with a current and valid Method 9 certification. Results of Method 9 readings and a copy of the certified Method 9 reader's certificate shall be kept on site and made available to the Division upon request. 6.5 Each engine is subject to the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants requirements of Regulation No. 8, Part E, Subpart ZZZZ (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart ZZZZ), for Stationary Reciprocating internal Combustion Engines, including but not limited to, the following: The requirements below reflect the current language as of the revisions to 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart ZZZZ published in the Federal Register on 1/30/2013. However, if revisions to this Subpart are published at a later date, the owner or operator is subject to the requirements contained in the revised version of 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart ZZZZ. These requirements have not been adopted into Colorado Regulation No. 8, Part E as of the date of this permit issuance [DATE], and are therefore not state -enforceable. In the event that these requirements are adopted into Colorado Regulations, they will become state -enforceable. §63.6585 Am I subject to this subpart? 6.5.1 §63.6585(f)(2) — Existing commercial emergency stationary RICE located at an area source of HAP emissions that do not operate or are not contractually obligated to be available for more than 15 hours per calendar year for the purposes specified in §63.6640(t)(2)(ii) and (iii) (Conditions 6.5.2.2b and 6.5.2.2c) and that do not operate for the purpose specified in §63.6640(f)(4)(ii) (Condition 6.5.2.3b) are not subject to this subpart. The stationary RICE must meet the definition of an emergency stationary RICE in §63.6675, which includes operating according to the provisions specified in §63.6640(t) (Condition 6.5.2). §63.6640 How do I demonstrate continuous compliance with the emission limitations, operating limitations, and other requirements? 6.5.2 §63.6640(f) - If you own or operate an existing emergency stationary RICE, you must operate the emergency stationary RICE according to the requirements in paragraphs (0(1) through (4) (Conditions 6.5.2.1 through 6.5.2.3) of this section. In order for the engine to be considered an emergency stationary RICE under this subpart, any operation other than emergency operation, maintenance and testing, emergency demand response, and operation in non -emergency situations for 50 hours per year, as described in paragraphs (f)(1) through (4) of this section, is prohibited. If you do not operate the engine according to the requirements in paragraphs (f)(4) through (4) of this section, the engine will not be considered an emergency engine under this subpart and must meet all requirements for non -emergency engines. 6.5.2.1 §63.6640(f)(1) — There is no time limit on the use of emergency stationary RICE in Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Page 26 emergency situations. 6.5.2.2 §63.6640(f)(2) — You may operate your emergency stationary RICE for any combination of the purposes specified in paragraphs (f)(2)(i) through (iii) of this section for a maximum of 100 hours per calendar year. Any operation for non - emergency situations as allowed by paragraphs (f)(3) (Condition 6.5.2.3) of this section counts as part of the 100 hours per calendar year allowed by this paragraph O)(2) - a. §63.6640(f)(2)(i) — Emergency stationary RICE may be operated for maintenance checks and readiness testing, provided that the tests are recommended by federal, state or local government, the manufacturer, the vendor, the regional transmission organization or equivalent balancing authority and transmission operator, or the insurance company associated with the engine. The owner or operator may petition the Administrator for approval of additional hours to be used for maintenance checks and readiness testing, but a petition is not required if the owner or operator maintains records indicating that federal, state, or local standards require maintenance and testing of emergency RICE beyond 100 hours per calendar year. b. §63.6640(f)(2)(ii) — Emergency stationary RICE may be operated for emergency demand response for periods in which the Reliability Coordinator under the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) Reliability Standard EOP- 002-3, Capacity and Energy Emergencies (incorporated by reference, see §63.14), or other authorized entity as determined by the Reliability Coordinator, has declared an Energy Emergency Alert Level 2 as defined in the NERC Reliability Standard EOP-002-3. c. §63.6640(f)(2)(iii) — Emergency stationary RICE may be operated for periods where there is a deviation of voltage or frequency of 5 percent or greater below standard voltage or frequency. 6.5.2.3 §63.6640([)(4) — Emergency stationary RICE located at area sources of HAP may be operated for up to 50 hours per calendar year in non -emergency situations. The 50 hours of operation in non -emergency situations are counted as part of the 100 hours per calendar year for maintenance and testing and emergency demand response provided in paragraph (O(2) of this section. Except as provided in paragraphs (t)(4)(i) and (ii) of this section, the 50 hours per year for non -emergency situations cannot be used for peak shaving or non -emergency demand response, or to generate income for a facility to an electric grid or otherwise supply power as part of a financial arrangement with another entity. a. §63.6640(t)(4)(i) — Prior to May 3, 2014, the 50 hours per year for non - emergency situations can be used for peak shaving or non -emergency demand response to generate income for a facility, or to otherwise supply power as part of a financial arrangement with another entity if the engine is operated as part of a peak shaving (load management program) with the local distribution system Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Page 27 operator and the power is provided only to the facility itself or to support the local distribution system. b. §63.6640(f)(4)(ii) — The 50 hours per year for non -emergency situations can be used to supply power as part of a financial arrangement with another entity if all of the following conditions are met: (i) §63.6640(f)(4)(ii)(A) — The engine is dispatched by the local balancing authority or local transmission and distribution system operator. (ii) §63.6640(fl(4)(ii)(B) — The dispatch is intended to mitigate local transmission and/or distribution limitations so as to avert potential voltage collapse or line overloads that could lead to the interruption of power supply in a local area or region. (iii)§63.6640(f)(4)(ii)(C) — The dispatch follows reliability, emergency operation or similar protocols that follow specific NERC, regional, state, public utility commission or local standards or guidelines. (iv)§63.6640(f)(4)(ii)(D) — The power is provided only to the facility itself or to support the local transmission and distribution system. (v) §63.6640(f)(4)(ii)(E) — The owner or operator identifies and records the entity that dispatches the engine and the specific NERC, regional, state, public utility commission or local standards or guidelines that are being followed for dispatching the engine. The local balancing authority or local transmission and distribution system operator may keep these records on behalf of the engine owner or operator. Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Page 28 7. Point 015 — Packing Operations: Three (3) Marsh VJ Patrion Plus Carton Printing Machines, Three (3) Nordson PRO Blue Hot Glue Machines, and Four (4) O-1 Custom Built Cold End Spray Machines Parameter Permit Condition Number Limitation Compliance Emission Factor Monitoring Method Interval VOC 7.1 12.8 tons per year See Condition 7.1 Recordkeeping and Twelve Month Rolling Calculation Monthly PM 30.4 tons per year 8.32 lbs per gal PM10 30.4 tons per year 8.32 lbs per gal PM25 30.4 tons per year 8.32 lbs per gal Carton Printing Product Throughput 7 7 Recnrdkeeninn Monthly Hot Glue Product throughput Cold End Spray Product Throughput n ifi 7 73 Less than or Equal to 20% EPA Method 22 Every Six (6) Months For Startup — Not to Exceed 30% for a Period or Periods more than 6 minutes in any 60 consecutive minute= MSDS Records 7.4 Recordkeeping Continuous Particulate 7.5 30.69 Ibs per hour Calculaio and Calculation Annually Notes: All requirements apply to the all processes in the packing operations combined unless stated differently below. 7.1 All Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) and Particulate Matter (PM, PM10, and PM25) emissions from the packing operations shall not exceed the limitations specified in the table above (Colorado Construction Permit 03WE1151, as modified under the provisions of Section I, Condition 1.3). Monthly emissions shall be calculated using the conditions below. 7.1.1 Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) emissions from the three (3) carton printing machines, three (3) hot glue machines, and four (4) cold end spray machines shall be determined using the VOC contents listed below and the monthly product throughput as required in Condition 7.2 in the equations below. Source 1 VOC Content Units Carton Printing Machines I 9.08 lbs VOC per gallon Hot Glue Machines I 0.02 lbs VOC per lb hot glue Cold End Spray I 0.06 lbs VOC per gallon Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Page 29 Monthly emissions of VOC from the carton printing machines and hot glue machines shall be calculated by the end of the subsequent month using the above VOC contents and monthly product throughput as required in Condition 7.2 in the equation below. In the material application for the carton printing machines and hot glue machines; there is a one hundred percent (100%) evaporative material loss: VOC / (g s Ibsl ( gal Ibs \\ r tons l ! VOC Content \ al or lb J x Throughput `month or month) Emissions \month) ` 2000 (tan) Monthly emissions of VOC from the cold end spray machines shall be calculated by the end of the subsequent month using the above VOC content and monthly product throughput as required in Condition 7.2 in the equation below. In the material application for the cold end spray machines; there is a thirty percent (30%) material application and seventy percent (70%) evaporative material loss. VOC tons ll Emissions kmont ! VOC Content I gal I x Throughput( mgnth) lbs / (lbs x 0.7o 2000 lton�) Compliance with the annual VOC emission limitation shall be determined by adding the monthly VOC emissions calculated for the carton printing machines, hot glue machines, and cold end spray machines. Monthly VOC emissions shall be used in a twelve month rolling total to monitor compliance with the annual emission limitation. Each month, a new twelve month total shall be calculated using the previous twelve month's total. 7.1.2 Particulate Matter (PM, PM10, and PM2 5) emissions from the cold end spray machines shall be determined using the particulate matter emission rate in the table above and the monthly product throughput as required in Condition 7.2 in the equation below. EF (1bs1 X Throughput ( gal PM, PMla, PMZ_s tons }} gal JJ month) Emissions (rnonth/ 2000 (lbs) \tonl) Monthly particulate matter (PM, PM10, and PM25) emissions shall be used in a twelve month rolling total to monitor compliance with the annual emission limitations. Each month, a new twelve month total shall be calculated using the previous twelve month's total. 7.2 Product consumption from the carton printing machines, hot glue machines, and cold end spray machines shall be monitored and recorded on a monthly basis. Monthly consumption shall be used to determine compliance with the annual emission limitations in Condition 7.1 and shall be made available for Division review upon request. The monthly product consumption shall include the total product Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Page 30 consumed for all three (3) carton printing machines, all three (3) hot glue machines, and all four (4) cold end spray machines. 7.3 Opacity of emissions shall not exceed the following: 7.3.1 Except as provided for in Condition 7.3.2 below, no owner or operator of a source shall allow or cause the emission into the atmosphere of any air pollutant which is in excess of twenty percent (20%) opacity (Colorado Construction Permit 03WE1151, as provided for under the provisions of Section 1, Condition 1.3 and Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section IT.A.1). Compliance with the opacity limitation in Condition 7.3.1 shall be monitored by conducting a visual emission observation in accordance with EPA Reference Method 22, once every six (6) months. If visible emissions are observed, an inspection on the emission unit shall be conducted within twenty four (24) hours from when the visible emissions were observed. The source shall then perform any maintenance on the emission unit as necessary in a timely manner. A log of observations, inspections, and maintenance pertormed shall be maintained and made available to the Division review upon request. 7.3.2 No owner or operator of a source shall allow or cause to be emitted into the atniosphere any air pollutant resulting from startup, process modification, or adjustment of control equipment which is in excess of thirty percent (30%) opacity for a period or periods aggregating more than six (6) minntec in anv cixty (Fill) rnncerntive minntec (Cnlnradn Cnnetrnrtinn Parmil ( WE1 151 as provided for under the provision of Section I, Condition 1.3 and Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section II.A.4). Compliance with the opacity limitation in Condition 7.3.2 shall be monitored by conducting a visual emission ubsek vatiuti iii accordance with EPA Reference iviediuu 22, once every six (o') months. This visible emission observation shall be taken within one (1) hour of the commencement of any of the specific activities identified in Condition 7.3.1 and every twenty four (24) hours thereafter until that activity is completed. If visible emissions are observed, an inspection of the emission unit shall be conducted within twenty four (24) hours from when the visible emissions were observed. The source shall then perform any maintenance on the emission unit as necessary in a timely manner. A log of observations, inspections, and maintenance performed shall be maintained and made available to the Division review upon request. A visible emission observation is not required for any six (6) month period where no specific activities identified in Condition 7.3.2 have occurred. 7.4 The most recent Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) for each current product in use shall be kept on site in the MSDS record and made available for Division review upon request (Colorado Construction Permit 03WE1151, as provided for under the provisions of Section 1, Condition 1.3). For each product the source has discontinued use, the MSDS shall be kept on site in the MSDS record and made available for Division review upon request. Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Page 31 7.5 The packing operations are subject to the Regulation Number 1 Emission Control Regulations for Particulate Matter for the State of Colorado, Particulate Matter for Manufacturing Processes, Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section TIT.C as follows: 7.5.1 No owner or operator of a manufacturing process unit shall cause or permit emission of any particulate matter into the atmosphere during any consecutive sixty minute period which is in excess of the following: 7.5.1.1 For process equipment of process weight rates equal to or greater than 30 tons per hour, the allowable emission rate shall be monitored by use of the equation: E = 17.31(P)o.16 Where: E = The Allowable Particulate Emissions in lbs/hr = 30.69 lbs/hr P = The Process Weight Rate in tons/hr = 35.83 tons/hr Note that the numeric standard for the combined packing operations was determined using the process weight rate of total glass production (35.83 tons of glass produced per hour). In absence of credible evidence to the contrary, compliance with the Particulate Matter Emission limitation shall be monitored by maintaining a record of a calculation demonstrating compliance with the limitation. A copy of the calculation shall be maintained and made available for Division review upon request. Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 8. Point 017 — Mould Shop Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Page 32 Parameter Permit Condition Number Limitation Compliance Emission Factor Monitoring Method Interval PM 8.1 2.25 tons per year 0.514 lbs per hr Recordkeeping and Twelve Month Rolling Calculation Monthly PMin - 2.25 tons per year 0.514 lbs per hr PM25 2.25 tons per year 0.514 lbs per hr Opacity 8.3 Less than or Equal to 20% EPA Method 22 Every Six (6) Months For Startup — Not to Exceed 30% for a Period or Periods more than 6 minutes in any 60 consecutive minutes Hours of Operation 8.2 Recordkeeping Monthly Particulate 8.4 30.69 lbs per hour Recordkeeping and Calculation Annually Control Requirements 8.5 Pressure Drop Inspections Quarterly 8.1 All Particulate Matter (PM, PM10, and PM2 5) emissions shall not exceed the limitations specified in the table above (as provided for under the provisions of Section I, Condition 1.3, and Colorado Regulation N_., 2 Part R_ Section II.A.6 6 a».1 Part /' Qectinn Y kn_erl nn requester? emissions identified on the APEN submitted on March 25, 2004). Monthly emissions shall be calculated using the emission factors above and the hours of operation as required in Condition 8.2 in the equation below. Ibs (hours) PM, PM10, & PM2.5 ( tons ) EF �hour� x Hours o f Operation mnonth Emissions month 2000 (lbsl Moll) Monthly particulate matter (PM, PM10, and PM2 5) emissions shall be used in a twelve month rolling total to determine compliance with the annual emission limitations. Each month, a new twelve month total shall be calculated using the previous twelve month's data. 8.2 The hours of operation of the mould shop shall be monitored and recorded for each calendar month. Hours of operation shall be used to determine compliance with the annual emission limitation in Condition 8.1. Records of the hours of operation shall be made available for Division review upon request. 8.3 Opacity of emissions shall not exceed the following; Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Page 33 8.3.1 Except as provided for in Condition 8.3.2 below, no owner or operator of a source shall allow or cause the emission into the atmosphere of any air pollutant which is in excess of twenty percent (20%) opacity (Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section II.A.1). Compliance with the opacity limitation in Condition 8.3.1 shall be monitored by conducting a visual emission observation in accordance with EPA Reference Method 22, once every six (6) months. if visible emissions are observed, an inspection on the emission unit shall be conducted within twenty four (24) hours from when the visible emissions were observed. The source shall then perform any maintenance on the emission unit as necessary in a timely manner. A log of observations, inspections, and maintenance performed shall be maintained and made available to the Division review upon request. 8.3.2 No owner or operator of a source shall allow or cause to be emitted into the atmosphere any air pollutant resulting from startup, process modification, or adjustment of control equipment which is in excess of thirty percent (30%) opacity for a period or periods aggregating more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) consecutive minutes (Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section II.A.4). Compliance with the opacity limitation in Condition 8.3.2 shall be monitored by conducting a visual emission observation in accordance with EPA Reference Method 22, once every six (6) months. This visible emission observation shall be taken within one (1) hour of the commencement of any of the specific activities identified in Condition 8.3.1 and every twenty four (24) hours thereafter until that activity is completed. If visible emissions are observed, an inspection of the emission unit shall be conducted within twenty four (24) hours from when the visible emissions were observed. The source shall then perform any maintenance on the emission unit as necessary in a timely manner. A log of observations, inspections, and maintenance performed shall be maintained and made available to the Division review upon request. A visible emission observation is not required for any six (6) month period where no specific activities identified in Condition 8.3.2 have occurred. 8.4 The mould shop is subject to the Regulation Number 1 Emission Control Regulations for Particulate Matter for the State of Colorado, Particulate Matter for Manufacturing Processes, Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section III.C as follows: 8.4.1 No owner or operator of a manufacturing process unit shall cause or permit emission of any particulate matter into the atmosphere during any consecutive sixty minute period which is in excess of the following: 8.4.1.1 For process equipment of process weight rates equal to or greater than 30 tons per hour, the allowable emission rate shall be monitored by use of the equation: E = 17.31(P)a.16 Where: E = The Allowable Particulate Emissions in lbs/hr = 30.69 lbs/hr P = The Process Weight Rate in tons/hr = 35.83 tons/hr Note that the numeric standard for the combined forming machines operation was Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 Owens -Brockway Glass Container inc. Page 34 determined using the process weight rate of total glass production (35.83 tons of glass produced per hour). In absence of credible evidence to the contrary, compliance with the Particulate Matter Emission limitation shall he monitored by maintaining a record of a calculation demonstrating compliance with the limitation. A copy of the calculation shall be maintained and made available for Division review upon request. 8.5 The mould house dust collector shall be inspected on a quarterly basis to ensure the pressure drop across each bag is within manufacturer's specifications. Inspections shall be recorded in a log and made available for Division review upon request. If the pressure drop is outside of manufacturer's specifications, appropriate maintenance shall be performed to bring the pressure back into range (Operating and Maintenance Plan dated 5/24/2016). Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Page 35 9. Point 018 — Two (2) Marley NC Class Cooling Towers Systems Cooling Tower (2,000 gpm) and Furnaces Cooling Tower (500 gpm) Parameter Permit Condition Number Limitation Compliance Emission Factor Monitoring Method Interval PM 9.1 12.5 tons per year 0.019 lbs per 10' gal Recordkeeping and Twelve Month Rolling Calculation Monthly PMio 12.5 tons per year 0.019 lbs per 10' gal PM2 5 12.5 tons per year 0.019 lbs per 10' gal Water Circulation Rate 9 2 1,314 MMgal per year Opacity 9.3 Less than or Equal to 20% See Condi ion 9.3 Notes: All requirements apply to the two (2) cooling towers combined unless stated differently below. 9.1 All Particulate Matter (PM, PM10, and PM2,5) emissions shall not exceed the limitations specified in the table above (Colorado Construction Permit 03WE1151, as modified under the provisions of Section 1, Condition 1.3). Monthly emissions shall be calculated using the emission factors above and the water circulation rate as required in Condition 9.2 in the equation below. EF lbs x Water Circulation Rate (. gal ) PM,PM"& PM2.5 ( tons ) _ �I o: gal month lbs Emissions month 2000(on) Monthly particulate matter (PM, PM10, and PM2 5) emissions shall be uscd in a twelve month rolling total to determine compliance with the annual emission limitations. Each month, a new twelve month total shall be calculated using the previous twelve month's data. 9.2 The quantity of water circulated in the cooling towers shall not exceed the limitation specified in the table above (Colorado Construction Permit 03WE1151, as provided for under the provisions of Section I, Condition 1.3). The quantity of water circulated for each cooling tower shall be monitored and recorded on a monthly basis from the cooling tower's water meter. Once recorded, the monthly quantity of water circulated from each cooling tower shall be added together. The monthly quantities of combined water circulated through the units shall be used in a twelve month rolling total to determine compliance with the annual limitation. Each month, a new twelve month total shall be calculated using the previous twelve months data. 9.3 Visible emissions for the cooling towers shall not exceed twenty percent (20%) opacity (Colorado Construction Permit 03WE1151, as modified under the provisions of Section I, Condition 1.3). in absence of credible evidence to the contrary, compliance with the opacity limit shall be presumed provided the cooling towers are designed and operated as set forth in this Operating Permit. The permittee shall maintain records that verify the cooling towers are designed and operated as set forth in this Operating Permit. Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit /4 06OPWE2S9 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Page 36 Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. 10. Point 019 and 020 — Batch House Operations, Thirty -Six (36) Flex Kleen Dust Collectors Page 37 Parameter Permit Condition Number Limitation Compliance Emission Factor Monitoring Method Interval PM 10.1 Point 019: 3.57 tons per year Point 019: 0.005 grains per scf Recordkeeping and Twelve Month Rolling Calculation Monthly Point 020: 2.11 tons per year Point 020: 0.0015 grains per scf PMID Point 019: 3.57 tons per year Point 019: 0.005 grains per scf Point 020: 2.11 tons per year Point 020: 0.0015 grains per scf PM, s Point 019: 3.57 tons per year Point 019: 0.005 grains per scf Point 020: 2.11 tons per year Point 020: 0.0015 grains per set' Opacity 10.2 Less than or Equal to 20% EPA Method 22 Every Six (6) Months For Startup — Not to Exceed 30% for a Period or Periods more than 6 minutes in any 60 consecutive minutes Dust Collector Operation 10.3 and 10.4 Pressure Drop Inspections Recordkeeping Quarterly Vent Indoors Particulate 10.5 30.69 lbs per hour Recordkeeping loand Calculation Annually Notes: All requirements apply to each points dust collectors combined unless sta ed differently below. 10.1 All Particulate Matter (PM, PMto, and PM2 5) emissions from all dust collectors associated with each point shall not exceed the limitations specified in the table above (Colorado Construction Permit 03WE1151, as modified under the provisions of Section 1, Condition 1.3). Monthly emissions shall be calculated using the emission factors above and the design rate of each dust collector in the equation below. PM, PMta, & PM2.5 ( tons Emissions month EF (grain) x (60 min 1 x 24 hoursl x (Number of Days) X Design Rate scf 1 scf hour) ` day f Month f min) 7000 (grains x 2000 (/ l lb ) (—tonlbs) The design rates for each dust collector are shown in the table below. AIRS ID Unit Description Number of Units Design Rate (scf/min) 019 Batch House Dust Collector B 2 7,500 019 Batch House Dust Collector B I 4,000 Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Page 38 020 Batch House Dust Collector A 6 1,000 020 Batch House Dust Collector C 2 1,000 020 Batch House Dust Collector C 1 700 020 I Batch House Dust Collector D 2 400 020 Batch House Dust Collector F 2 1,000 020 Batch House Dust Collector G 4 1,000 020 Batch House Dust Collector H 14 1,000 020 Batch House Dust Collector 1 2 1,000 Please note that the emission factors above for particulate matter (PM, PM10, and PMZ 5) for Point 020 includes the 70% control efficiency. Monthly particulate matter (PM, PM10, and PM2 5) emissions shall be used in a twelve month rolling total to determine compliance with the annual emission limitations. Each month, a new twelve month total shall be calculated using the previous twelve month's data. 10.2 Opacity of emissions shall not exceed the following: 10.2.1 Except as provided for in Condition 10.2.2 below, no owner or operator of a source shall allow or cause the emission into the atmosphere of any air pollutant which is in excess of twenty percent (20%) opacity (Colorado Construction Permit 03WE1 151, as provided or under the provisions of Section I, Condition 1.3 and Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section II.A.1). Compliance with the opacity limitation in Condition 10 2.1 shall he monitored by c.ondncling a visual emission observation in accordance with EPA Reference Method 22, once every six (6) months. If visible emissions are observed, an inspection on the emission unit shall be conducted within twenty four (24) hours from when the visible emissions were observed. The source shall then perform any maintenance on the emission unit as necessary in a timely manner. A log of observations, inspections, and maintenance performed shall be maintained and made available to the Division review upon request. 10.2.2 No owner or operator of a source shall allow or cause to be emitted into the atmosphere any air pollutant resulting from startup, process modification, or adjustment of control equipment which is in excess of thirty percent (30%) opacity for a period or periods aggregating more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) consecutive minutes (Colorado Construction Permit 03WE1151, as provided for under the provisions of Section I. Condition 1.3 and Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section TT.A.4). Compliance with the opacity limitation in Condition 10.2.2 shall be monitored by conducting a visual emission observation in accordance with EPA Reference Method 22, once every six (6) months. This visible emission observation shall be taken within one (1) hour of the commencement of any of the specific activities identified in Condition 10.2.1 and every twenty four (24) hours thereafter until that activity is completed. If visible emissions are observed, an inspection of the emission unit shall be conducted within twenty four (24) hours from when the visible emissions were observed. The source shall then perform any maintenance on the emission Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Page 39 unit as necessary in a timely manner. A log of observations, inspections, and maintenance performed shall be maintained and made available to the Division review upon request. A visible emission observation is not required for any six (6) month period where no specific activities identified in Condition 10.2.2 have occurred. 10.3 Each dust collector shall be inspected on a quarterly basis to ensure the pressure drop across each bag is within manufacturer's specifications of 0.5 to 4.0 inches. Inspections shall be recorded in a log and made available for Division review upon request. If the pressure drop is outside of manufacturer's specifications, appropriate maintenance shall be performed to bring the pressure back into range (Operating and Maintenance Plan dated 5/24/2016). 10.4 Each dust collector shall be vented indoors (Colorado Construction Permit 03WE1151, as provided for under the provisions of Section I, Condition 1.3). 10.5 The Batch House Operations are subject to the Regulation Number 1 Emission Control Regulations for Particulate Matter for the State of Colorado, Particulate Matter for Manufacturing Processes, Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section III.C as follows: 10.5.1 No owner or operator of a manufacturing process unit shall cause or permit emission of any particulate matter into the atmosphere during any consecutive sixty minute period which is in excess of the following: 10.5.1.1 For process equipment of process weight rates equal to or greater than 30 tons per hour, the allowable emission rate shall be monitored by use of the equation: E = 17.31(P)0.16 Where: E = The Allowable Particulate Emissions in lbs/hr = 30.69 lbs/hr P = The Process Weight Rate in tons/hr = 35.83 tons/hr Note that the numeric standard for the combined forming machines operation was determined using the process weight rate of total glass production (35.83 tons of glass produced per hour). In absence of credible evidence to the contrary, compliance with the Particulate Matter Emission limitation shall be monitored by maintaining a record of a calculation demonstrating compliance with the limitation. A copy of the calculation shall be maintained and made available for Division review upon request. Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Page 40 11. Point 021 — Fugitive Emissions from Cullet Storage Piles, Rail Car Unloading, Truck Unloading, and Haul Roads Parameter Permit Condition Number Compliance Emission Factor Monitoring g Method Interval PM 11.1 38.3 tons per year See Condition 11.1 Recordkeeping and Twelve Month Rolling Calculation Monthly PM10 8.9 tons per year PMz 5 2.0 tons per year Fugitive Particulate Emissions Requirements 11.2 See Condition 11.2 Certification Semi -Annually Cutlet Storage Pile 11.3 62,780 tons per year Recordkeeping and Twelve Month Rolling Calculation Monthly Rail Car Unloading Sand: 192,136 tons per year Raw Material: 139,248 tons per year Truck Unloading Raw Material: 59,349 tons per year Cutlet: 141,109 tons per year All Particulate Matter (PM, PM10, and PM2 5) emissions shall not exceed the limitations specified in the table above (Colorado Construction Permit 03WEI 151, as modified under the provisions of Section I, Condition 1.3). Tn absence of credible evidence to the contrary, compliance with the particulate matter emission limits is presumed provided the cullet storage piles, rail car unloading, truck unloading, and haul roads are operated in accordance with the Particulate Emissions Control Plan in Condition 11.2 and the quantity of materials stored, unloaded, and hauled do not exceed the limitation in Condition 11.3 (Construction Permit 03WE1151). 11.2 The fugitive dust emissions are subject to a Particulate Emissions Control Plan as required in the Particulate Matter, Fugitive Particulate Emissions in Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section ITI.D, as follows (Colorado Construction Permit 03WE1151, as provided for under the provisions of Section 1, Condition 1.3): 11.2.1 Every owner or operator of a new source or activity that is subject to this Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section 111.D and which is required to obtain an emission permit under Colorado Regulation No. 3 shall operate under an approved fugitive emission particulate emission control plan (Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section ITT.D.1.b). The following measures shall be utilized to minimize fugitive particulate matter emissions (Colorado Construction Permit 03WE1151). 11.2.1.1 Visible emissions shall not exceed twenty percent (20%), no off -property transport of visible emissions. 11.2.1.2 No off -property transport of visible emissions shall apply to on -site haul roads, the Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Page 41 nuisance guidelines shall apply to off -site haul roads. 11.2.1.3 There shall be no off -property transport of visible emissions from haul trucks when operating on the property of the owner or operator. There shall be no off -vehicle transport of visible emissions from the material in the haul trucks when operating off of the property of the owner or operator. 11.2.1.4 Haul roads shall be paved. 11.2.1.5 Control rings shall be connected and used during rail car and truck unloading of sand and raw materials, as necessary. 11.2.1.6 Unloading areas and cullet storage pile areas shall be partially enclosed to reduce wind speed. The source shall certify semi-annually that the above control measures have been followed to minimize particulate matter emissions from the haul roads. 11.2.2 A control plan revision shall be submitted to the Division for Division review and approval when requested by the Division. The control plan revision shall be submitted to the Division within sixty days (or the time period specified by the Division) after being notified by the division that such submittal is required (Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section III.D.I.c and III.D.I.e.(ii).(A)). The 20% opacity, no off -transport, and nuisance emission limitations guidelines of Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section TTT.D are not federally enforceable standards and no person shall be cited for violation thereof pursuant to C.R.S. 1973, 25-7-115 as amended (Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section TII.D.l .e.(iii)). 11.3 The quantity of materials stored, unloaded, and hauled shall not exceed the limitations specified in the table above (Colorado Construction Permit 03WE1151). The quantity of materials stored, unloaded, and hauled shall be monitored and recorded monthly. Monthly quantities of materials hauled shall be used in a twelve month rolling total to monitor compliance with the annual emission limitations. Each month, a new twelve month total shall be calculated using the previous twelve month's total. Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Page 42 12. Point 024 — One (1) Caterpillar C9 Diesel Fired Compression Ignition Emergency Generator, Site Rated at 457 HP Parameter Permit Condition Number Limitation - Compliance Emission Factor Monitoring Method interval NOx 12.1 1.3 tons per year 1.33 lbs per MM13tu Recordkeeping and Twelve Month Rolling Calculation Monthly Diesel Fuel Consumption 12.2 Recordkeeping Monthly Opacity 12.3 Less than or Equal to 20% EPA Method 9 Annually For Startup — Not to Exceed 30% for a Period or Periods more than 6 minutes in any 60 consecutive minutes Hours of Operation 12.4 500 hours per year Non-Resettable Hour Meter and Recordkeeping Monthly RACT — VOC and NOx Emissions r �.5 Compliance with NSPS 1111 is RACT ,._�:r__.:__ �G1411�y641V" Annual -. ,y 40 CFR 60 (NSPS) Subpart IIII Requirements 12.6 See Condition 12.6 See Condition 12.6 40 CFR (NSPS) 6O " `" ""') Subpart A Requirements 12.7 See Condition 12.7 See Condition 12.7 40 CFR 63 (MACT) Subpart ZZZZ Requirements 12.8 Compliance with NSPS IIII See Condition 12.8 12.1 Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) emissions from this engine shall not exceed the limitation stated in the table above (Colorado Construction Permit 12WE1354, as provided for under the provisions of Section I, Condition 1.3). Monthly emissions of NOx shall be calculated by the end of the subsequent month using the above emission factor and the monthly diesel fuel consumption as required in Condition 12.2 in the equation below: NOx Emissions / to \ / ,gat \ ULNINtu r ton l Emission Factor IM Matti x Diesel Fuel Consumption lmonthJ x Fuel Heating Value �� gal ) lrnanth/ 2000 conl Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Page 43 A twelve month rolling total of emissions shall be maintained to monitor compliance with the annual emission limitation. Each month, a new twelve month total shall be calculated using the previous twelve month's data. 12.2 Total diesel fuel consumption from this engine shall be monitored and recorded by the end of each subsequent month. Diesel fuel consumption from this engine shall be monitored by multiplying the maximum hourly fuel consumption rate of this engine by the hours of operation for that month. Monthly diesel fuel consumption from this engine shall be used in a rolling twelve month total of fuel consumption to monitor compliance with the annual emission limitation as required in Condition 12.1. Each month, a new twelve month total shall be calculated using the previous twelve month's data. The total diesel fuel consumption shall be made available for Division review upon request. 12.3 Opacity of emissions shall not exceed the following: 12.3.1 Except as provided for in Condition 12.3.2 below, no owner or operator of a source shall allow or cause the emission into the atmosphere of any air pollutant which is in excess of twenty percent (20%) opacity (Colorado Construction Permit I2WE1354, as provided for under the provisions of Section T, Condition 1.3 and Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section 11.A.1). 12.3.2 No owner or operator of a source shall allow or cause to be emitted into the atmosphere any air pollutant resulting from startup, process modification, or adjustment of control equipment which is in excess of thirty percent (30%) opacity for a period or periods aggregating more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) consecutive minutes (Colorado Construction Permit 12WE1354, as provided for under the provisions of Section 1, Condition 1.3 and Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section I1.A.4). Compliance with these limitations shall be monitored by conducting visual emission observations in accordance with EPA Reference Method 9 as follows: 12.3.3 Compliance with the opacity standard in Condition 12.3.2 shall be monitored by conducting visible emission observations in accordance with EPA Method 9, once per calendar year. This opacity observation shall be taken within one (1) hour of the commencement of any of the specific activities identified in Condition 12.3.2 and every 24 hours thereafter until that activity is completed. A visible emission observation is not required for any annual period where no specific activities identified in Condition 12.3.2 have occurred. 12.3.4 An opacity observation shall be conducted annually (calendar year period) to monitor compliance with the opacity limit in Condition 12.3.1. If the engine is operated more than 250 hours in any calendar year period, a second opacity observation shall be conducted. If two opacity readings are conducted in the annual (calendar year) period, such readings shall be conducted at least thirty (30) days apart. If the engine is not operated during the annual (calendar year) period, then no opacity observation is required. Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Page 44 12.3.5 Subject to the provisions of C.R.S 25-7-123.1 and in the absence of credible evidence to the contrary, exceedance of the opacity limit shall be considered to exist from the time a Method 9 reading is taken that shows an exceedance of the opacity limit until a Method 9 reading is taken that shows the opacity is less than the opacity limit. 12.3.6 All opacity observations shall be performed by an observer with a current and valid Method 9 certification. Results of Method 9 readings and a copy of the certified Method 9 reader's certificate shall be kept on site and made available to the Division upon request. 12.4 The hours of operation for this engine shall not exceed the limitation stated in the table above (Colorado Construction Permit 12WE1354, as provided for under the provisions of Section I, Condition 1.3). Hours of operation shall be recorded for any hour the generator is operated using a non-resettable hour run-time meter and documented monthly in a log for Division review upon request. Monthly hours of operation shall he used in a twelve month rolling total to monitor compliance with the annual hours of operation limitation and to calculate the diesel fuel consumption as required in Condition 12.2. Each month, a new twelve month total shall be calculated using the pervious twelve month's data. 12.5 This engine is subject to RACT requirements for VOC and NOx emissions (Colorado Construction Permit 12WE1354, as provided for under the provisions of Section I, Condition 1.3 and Colorado Regulation No. 3, Part B, Section III.D.2.a and Colorado Regulation No. 7, Section IT.C.2). RACT for VOC and NOx shall be met by complying with the requirements in 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart 1111 !r"n,,.Iirin,, I') Al 12.6 This source is subject to the New Source Performance Standards requirements of Regulation No. 6, Part A_ Subpart IIII (40 CFR Part 60_ Subpart Till), for Stationary Compression Ignition Internal Combustion Engines, including, but not limited to, the following: The requirements below reflect the current rule language as of the revisions to 40 CFR Part 60 Subpart IIII published in the Federal Register on 06/28/2011. However, if revisions to this Subpart are published at a later date, the owner or operator is subject to the requirements contained in the revised version of 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart IIII. Emission Standards for Owners and Operators §60.4205 What emission standards must I meet for emergency engines if I am an owner or operator of a stationary CI internal combustion engine? 12.6.1 §60.4205(b) - Owners and operators of 2007 model year and later emergency stationary CI ICE with a displacement of less than 30 liters per cylinder that are not fire pump engines must comply with the emission standards for new non -road CI engines in §60.4202 (Conditions 12.6.1.1 and 12.6.1.2), for all pollutants, for the same model year and maximum engine power for their 2007 model year and later emergency stationary CI ICE. 12.6.1.1 §60.4202(a) — Stationary CI internal combustion engine manufacturers must certify their 2007 model year and later emergency stationary CI ICE with a maximum engine power less than or equal to 2,237 KW (3,000 HP) and a displacement of less than 10 Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Page 45 liters per cylinder that are not fire pump engines to the emission standards specified in paragraph a(2) below. 12.6.1.2 §60.4202(a)(2) — For engines with a maximum engine power greater than or equal to 37 KW (50 HP), the certification emission standards for new non -road CT engines for the same model year and maximum engine power in 40 CFR Part 89.112 and 40 CFR Part 89.113 for all pollutants beginning in model year 2007. The specific emission limitations in 40 CFR Part 89.112 that apply to this unit are as follows: Tier 111 requirements for Model Engines 225 < kW < 450 Emission Standards (g/kW-hr) Emission Standards (g/hp-hr) NMIIC + NOx CO PM NMHC + NOx CO I PM 4.0 3.5 0.2 3.0 2.6 I 0.15 Note that the smoke standards in 40 CFR Part 89.113 do not apply because the engine is a constant speed engine (§89.113(c)(3)). §60.4206 How long must I meet the emission standards ff I am an owner or operator of a stationary CI internal combustion engine? 12.6.2 §60.4206 — Owners and operators of stationary CI ICE must operate and maintain stationary CI ICE that achieve the emission standards as required in §60.4205 (Condition 12.6.1) over the entire life of the engine. Fuel Requirements for Owners and Operators §60.4207 What fuel requirements must I meet if I am an owner or operator of a stationary CI internal combustion engine subject to this subpart? 12.6.3 §60.4207(b) — Beginning October 1, 2010, owners and operators of stationary CI ICE subject to this subpart with a displacement of less than 30 liters per cylinder that use diesel fuel must use diesel fuel that meets the requirements of 40 CFR Part 80.510(b) (Condition 12.6.3.1) for non - road diesel fuel, except that any existing diesel fuel purchased (or otherwise obtained) prior to October 1, 2010, may be used until depleted. 12.6.3.1 40 CFR Part 80.510(b) - Beginning June 1, 2010. Except as otherwise specifically provided in this subpart, all NR and LM diesel fuel is subject to the following per - gallon standards: a. §80.510(b)(1) — Sulfur Content (i) 15 ppm maximum for NR diesel fuel. b. §80.510(b)(2) — Cetane index or aromatic content as follows: (i) A minimum cetane index of 40; or (ii) A maximum aromatic content of 35 volume percent. Compliance with the fuel limitations shall be monitored by sampling and analyzing Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Page 46 each shipment of diesel fuel to determine the sulfur and cctane and/or aromatic content using appropriate ASTM methods, or equivalent if approved in advance by the Division. In lieu of sampling, vendor data may be used to determine the sulfux and cetane and/or aromatic content, provided that the sampling analysis was performed using the appropriate ASTM methods. Other Requirements for Owners and Operators 60.4209 What are the monitoring requirements if I am an owner or operator of a stationary CI internal combustion engine? 12.6.4 §60.4209 — if you are an owner or operator, you must meet the monitoring requirements of this section. In addition, you must also meet the monitoring requirements specified in §60.4211 (Condition 12.6.6). 12.66.5 §60.4209(x) — if yuu ate an uwnei of upciatui of au elacigc iey statiuiiaiy CT internal combustion engine that does not meet the standards applicable to non -emergency engines, you must install a non-resettable hour meter prior to startup of the engine. Compliance Requirements §60.4211 What are my compliance requirements if I am an owner or operator of a stationary CI internal combustion engine? 12.6.6 §60.4211(a) - If you are an owner or operator and must comply with the emission standards specified in this subpart, you must do all of the following, except as permitted under paragraph §60.4211(g) (Condition 12.6.2.4) of this section: 12.6.6.1 §60.4211(a)(1) — Operate and maintain the stationary CI internal combustion engine and control device according to the manufacturer's emission -related written instructions; 12.6.6.2 §60.4211(a)(2) — Change only those emission -related settings that are permitted by the manufacturer; and 12.6.6.3 §60.4211(a)(3) — Meet the requirements of 40 CFR Parts 89, 94 and/or 1068, as they apply to you. 12.6.7 §60.4211(c) — If you are an owner or operator of a 2007 model year and later stationary CT internal combustion engine and must comply with the emission standards specified in §60.4204(b) or §60.4205(b), you must comply by purchasing an engine certified to the emission standards in §60.4204(b), or §60.4205(b) or (c), as applicable, for the same model year and maximum engine power. The engine must be installed and configured according to the manufacturer's emission -related specifications, except as permitted in paragraph §60.4211(g) (Condition 12.6.8.4) of this section. 12.6.8 §60.4211(f) - If you own or operate an emergency stationary ICE, you must operate the emergency stationary ICE according to the requirements in paragraphs (f)(1) through (3) of this Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Page 47 section. In order for the engine to be considered an emergency stationary ICE under this subpart, any operation other than emergency operation, maintenance and testing, emergency demand response, and operation in non -emergency situations for 50 hours per year, as described in paragraphs (1)(1) through (3) (Conditions 12.6.8.1 through 12.6.8.3) of this section, is prohibited. If you do not operate the engine according to the requirements in paragraphs (1)(1) through (3) (Conditions 12.6.8.1 through 12.6.8.3) of this section, the engine will not be considered an emergency engine under this subpart and must meet all requirements for non -emergency engines. 12.6.8.1 §60.4211(1)(1) — There is no time limit on the use of emergency stationary ICE in emergency situations. 12.6.8.2 §60.4211(f)(2) — You may operate your emergency stationary ICE for any combination of the purposes specified in paragraphs (f)(2)(i) through (iii) (Conditions a through c) of this section for a maximum of 100 hours per calendar year. Any operation for non -emergency situations as allowed by paragraph (f)(3) (Condition 12.6.8.3) of this section counts as part of the 100 hours per calendar year allowed by this paragraph (1)(2). a. §60.4211(f)(2)(i) — Emergency stationary ICE may be operated for maintenance checks and readiness testing, provided that the tests are recommended by federal, state or local government, the manufacturer, the vendor, the regional transmission organization or equivalent balancing authority and transmission operator, or the insurance company associated with the engine. The owner or operator may petition the Administrator for approval of additional hours to be used for maintenance checks and readiness testing, but a petition is not required if the owner or operator maintains records indicating that federal, state, or local standards require maintenance and testing of emergency ICE beyond 100 hours per calendar year. b. §60.4211(f)(2)(ii) — Emergency stationary ICE may be operated for emergency demand response for periods in which the Reliability Coordinator under the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) Reliability Standard EOP- 002-3, Capacity and Energy Emergencies (incorporated by reference, see §60.17), or other authorized entity as determined by the Reliability Coordinator, has declared an Energy Emergency Alert Level 2 as defined in the NERC Reliability Standard EOP-002-3. c. §60.4211(f)(2)(iii) — Emergency stationary ICE may be operated for periods where there is a deviation of voltage or frequency of 5 percent or greater below standard voltage or frequency. 12.6.8.3 §60.4211(1)(3) — Emergency stationary ICE may be operated for up to 50 hours per calendar year in non -emergency situations. The 50 hours of operation in non - emergency situations are counted as part of the 100 hours per calendar year for maintenance and testing and emergency demand response provided in paragraph (f)(2) (Condition 12.6.8.2) of this section. Except as provided in paragraph (f)(3)(i) (Condition a) of this section, the 50 hours per calendar year for non -emergency situations cannot be used for peak shaving or non -emergency demand response, or to Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Page 48 generate income for a facility to an electric grid or otherwise supply power as part of a financial arrangement with another entity. a. §60.4211(f)(3)(i) — The 50 hours per year for non -emergency situations can be used to supply power as part of a financial arrangement with another entity if all of the following conditions are met: (0 §60.4211(t)(3)(i)(A) — The engine is dispatched by the local balancing authority or local transmission and distribution system operator; (ii) §60.4211(f)(3)(i)(B) — The dispatch is intended to mitigate local transmission and/or distribution limitations so as to avert potential voltage collapse or line overloads that could lead to the interruption of power supply in a local area or region. (iii)§60.4211(f)(3)(i)(C) — The dispatch follows reliability, emergency operation or similar protocols that follow specific NEKC, regional, state, public utility commission or local standards or guidelines. (iv)§60.4211(f)(3)(i)(D) — The power is provided only to the facility itself or to support the local transmission and distribution system. (v) §60.4211(f)(3)(i)(E) — The owner or operator identifies and records the Entity that rdicpatrhpc thr engines and ti -r cpnrifir NFRC� regional, state, public utility commission or local standards or guidelines that are being followed for dispatching the engine. The 1_.ral balancing anhnrit nrinral t_._ncmicenn and ncOrihi,tinn system operator may keep these records on behalf of the engine owner or operator. 12.6.8.4 §60.4211(g) - Tf you do not install, configure, operate, and maintain your engine and control device according to the manufacturer's emission -related written instructions, or you change emission -related settings in a way that is not permitted by the manufacturer, you must demonstrate compliance as specified in §60.4211(g)(1) through (3). Notification, Reports, and Records for Owners and Operators §60.4214 What are my notification, reporting, and recordkeeping requirements ifl am an owner or operator of a stationary CI internal combustion engine? 12.6.9 §60.4214(b) - If the stationary CI internal combustion engine is an emergency stationary internal combustion engine, the owner or operator is not required to submit an initial notification. Starting with the model years in table 5 to this subpart, if the emergency engine does not meet the standards applicable to non -emergency engines in the applicable model year, the owner or operator must keep records of the operation of the engine in emergency and non -emergency service that are recorded through the non-resettable hour meter. The owner must record the time of operation of the engine and the reason the engine was in operation during that time. Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Page 49 12.6.l0§60.4214(d) — If you own or operate an emergency stationary CI ICE with a maximum engine power more than 100 HP that operates or is contractually obligated to be available for more than 15 hours per calendar year for the purposes specified in §60.421 1(f)(2)(ii) and (iii) (Conditions 12.6.8.2b and 12.6.8.2c) or that operates for the purposes specified in §60.4211(f)(3)(i) (Condition 12.6.8.3a), you must submit an annual report according to the requirements in paragraphs (d)(1) through (3) (Conditions 12.6.10.1 through 12.6.10.3) of this section. 12.6.10.1 §60.4214(d)(1) — The report must contain the following information: a. §60.4214(d)(l)(i) — Company name and address where the engine is located. b. §60.4214(d)(2)(ii) — Date of the report and beginning and ending dates of the reporting period. c. §60.4214(d)(2)(iii)—Engine site rating and model year. d. §60.4214(d)(2)(iv) — Latitude and longitude of the engine in decimal degrees reported to the fifth decimal place. e. §60.4214(d)92)(v) — Hours operated for the purposes specified in §60.4211(f)(2)(ii) and (iii), including the date, start time, and end time for engine operation for the purposes specified in §60.4211(f)(2)(ii) and (iii) (Conditions 12.6.8.2b and 12.6.8.2c). f. §60.4214(d)(2)(vi) — Number of hours the engine is contractually obligated to be available for the purposes specified in §60.4211(f)(2)(ii) and (iii) (Conditions 12.6.8.2b and 12.6.8.2c. §60.4214(d)(2)(vii) — Hours spent for operation for the purposes specified in §60.4211(f)(3)(i) (Condition 12.6.8.3a), including the date, start time, and end time for engine operation for the purposes specified in §60.4211(f)(3)(i) (Condition 12.6.8.3a). The report must also identify the entity that dispatched the engine and the situation that necessitated the dispatch of the engine. 12.6.10.2 §60.4214(d)(2) — The first annual report must cover the calendar year 2015 and must be submitted no later than March 31, 2016. Subsequent annual reports for each calendar year must be submitted no later than March 31 of the following calendar year. 12.6.10.3 §60.4214(d)(3) — The annual report must be submitted electronically using the subpart specific reporting form in the Compliance and Emissions Data Reporting Interface (CEDRI) that is accessed through EPA's Central Data Exchange (CDX) (www.epa.gov/cdx). However, if the reporting form specific to this subpart is not available in CEDRI at the time that the report is due, the written report must be submitted to the Administrator at the appropriate address listed in §60.4. g. 12.7 This point is subject to the requirements in 40 CFR Part 60 Subpart A "General Provisions", as adopted by reference in Colorado Regulation No. 6, Part A, Subpart A. These requirements include, but are not limited to the following: Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Page 50 12.7.1 Written notification of construction and initial startup dates shall be submitted to the Division as required under §60.7. 12.7.2 Records of startups, shutdowns, and malfunctions shall be maintained, as required under §60.7. 12.7.3 At all times, including periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction, the facility and control equipment shall, to the extent practicable, be maintained and operated in a manner consistent with good air pollution control practices for minimizing emissions. Determination of whether or not acceptable operating and maintenance procedures are being used will be based on information available to the Division, which may include, but is not limited to, monitoring results, opacity observations, review of operating and maintenance procedures, and inspections of the source, as required under §60.11. 12.7.4 No article, machine, equipment or process shall be used to conceal an emission which would otherwise constitute a violation of an applicable standard. Such concealment includes, but is not limited to, the use of gaseous diluents to achieve compliance with an opacity standard or with a standard which is based on the concentration of a pollutant in the gases discharged to the atmosphere, as required under §60.12. 12.8 This engine is subject to the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants requirements of Regulation No. 8, Part E, Subpart ZZZZ (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart ZZZZ), for Stationary Reciprocating Internal Combustion Fngines, including hint not limited to, the fnllnwing_ The requirements below reflect the current language as of the revisions to 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart ZZZZ Published in the Federal Register on 1/30/2013. However. if revisions to this Subpart are published at a later date, the owner or operator is subject to the requirements contained in the revised verSiV11 of YV l.rlx tall vi, auvpaLl ZZZZ. These requirements have not been adopted into Colorado Regulation No. 8, Part E as of the date of this permit issuance [DATE], and are therefore not state -enforceable. In the event that these requirements are adopted into Colorado Regulations, they will become state -enforceable. §60.6590 What parts of my plant does this subpart cover? 12.8.1.1 §60.6590(c) — Stationary RICE subject to Regulations under 40 CFR Part 60. An affected source that meets any of the criteria below must meet the requirements of this part by meeting the requirements of 40 CFR Part 60 Subpart IIII, for compression ignition engines. No further requirements apply for such engines under this part. a. §60.6590(c)(1) — A new or reconstructed stationary RICE located at an area source. Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Page 51 13. Point 025 — One (1) Automatic Blank Lubricant System Parameter Permit Condition Number Limitation Compliance Emission Factor Monitoring Method Interval PM 13.1 2.6 tons per year 0.068 lbs per lb acetylene Recordkeeping and Twelve Month Rolling Calculation Monthly PK() 2.6 tons per year 0.068 lbs per lb acetylene PM25 2.6 tons per year 0.068 lbs per lb acetylene Hours of Operation 13.2 Recordkeeping Monthly Opacity 13.3 Less than or Equal to 20% EPA Method 22 Every Six (6) Months For Startup —Not to Exceed 30% for a Period or Periods more than 6 minutes in any 60 consecutive minutes Particulate 13.4 30.69 lbs per hour Calculaio and Calculation Annually Automatic Blank Lubricant Operation 13.5 See Condition 13.5 See Condition 13.5 13.1 All Particulate Matter (PM, PMie, and PM25) emissions shall not exceed the limitations specified in the table above (Colorado Construction Permit 03 WE1151, as modified under the provisions of Section 1, Condition 1.3). Monthly emissions shall be calculated using the emission factors above, the design rate for the system, and the hours of operation required in Condition 13.2 in the equation below. r lbs 1 lbs acetytene / firs ll PM, PMre, & PML,5 tons l_ EF \th acetylene) x Design Rate ( fir ) x Hours of Operation lmonthl Emissions (month/ 2000 (lbsl 1tot!J Monthly particulate matter (PM, PMIo, and PM2 5) emissions shall be used in a twelve month rolling total to determine compliance with the annual emission limitations. Each month, a new twelve month total shall be calculated using the previous month's data. 13.2 The hours of operation for the automatic blank lubrication system shall be recorded for each calendar month. Hours of operation shall be used to determine compliance with the annual emission limitation in Condition 13.1. Records of the hours of operation shall be kept and made available for Division review upon request. 13.3 Opacity of emissions shall not exceed the following: 13.3.1 Except as provided for in Condition 13.3.2 below, no owner or operator of a source shall allow or cause the emission into the atmosphere of any air pollutant which is in excess of twenty Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Page 52 percent (20%) opacity (Colorado Construction Permit 03WE1151, as provided for under the provisions of Section 1, Condition 1.3 and Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section II.A.1). Compliance with the opacity limitation in Condition 13.3.1 shall be monitored by conducting a visual emission observation in accordance with EPA Reference Method 22, once every six (6) months. If visible emissions are observed, an inspection on the emission unit shall be conducted within twenty four (24) hours from when the visible emissions were observed. The source shall then perform any maintenance on the emission unit as necessary in a timely manner. A log of observations, inspections, and maintenance performed shall be maintained and made available to the Division review upon request. 13.3.2 No owner or operator of a source shall allow or cause to be emitted into the atmosphere any air pollutant resulting from startup, process modification, or adjustment of control equipment which is in excess of thirty percent (30%) opacity for a period or periods aggregating more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) consecutive minutes (Colorado Construction Permit 03WE1151, as provided for under the provisions of Section 1, Condition l.3 and Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section TT.A.4). Compliance with the opacity limitation in Condition 13.3.2 shall be monitored by conducting a visual emission observation in accordance with EPA Reference Method 22, once every six (6) months. This visible emission observation shall be taken within one (1) hour of the commencement of on., of the specific activities identified i„ Condition 13.'3.1 .,,,.1 ever., t,,,a t„ four (24) hours thereafter until that activity is completed. If visible emissions are observed, an inspection of the emission unit shall be conducted within twenty four (24) hours from when the • i,sin „Lear„a,l T1, _ shall the„ .,,a.o a ..,..,r,.o .. .. ,.a..nrn, ...,,, mn;..te n,..,re ,.n the emission unit as necessary in a timely manner. A log of observations, inspections, and maintenance performed shall be maintained and made available to the Division review upon request. A visible emission observation is not required for any six (6) month period where no specific activities identified in Condition 13.3.2 have occurred. 13.4 The automatic blank lubrication system is subject to the Regulation Number 1 Emission Control Regulations for Particulate Matter for the State of Colorado, Particulate Matter for Manufacturing Processes, Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section Iii.C as follows: 13.4.1 No owner or operator of a manufacturing process unit shall cause or permit emission of any particulate matter into the atmosphere during any consecutive sixty minute period which is in excess of the following: 13.4.1.1 For process equipment of process weight rates equal to or greater than 30 tons per hour, the allowable emission rate shall be monitored by use of the equation: E = 17.31(P)°.16 Where: E = The Allowable Particulate Emissions in lbs/hr = 30.69 lbs/hr P = The Process Weight Rate in tons/hr = 35.83 tons/hr Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Page 53 Note that the numeric standard for the combined forming machines operation was determined using the process weight rate of total glass production (35.83 tons of glass produced per hour). In absence of credible evidence to the contrary, compliance with the Particulate Matter Emission limitation shall be monitored by maintaining a record of a calculation demonstrating compliance with the limitation. A copy of the calculation shall be maintained and made available for Division review upon request. 13.5 The ABL Burner Tips and Spark Electrodes shall be inspected daily to ensure uniform flame patterns and efficient acetylene bum off. If blockages are identified the burner tip and spark electrode shall be cleaned (Operating and Maintenance Plan dated 5/24/2016). Records of the daily inspections and maintenance (when applicable) shall be maintained in a log and made available for Division review upon request. Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 14. Facility Wide Requirements Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Page 54 Parameter Permit Condition Number Limitation Compliance Emission Factor Monitoring Method Interval Rental Compressor Engines Hours of Operation 14.1 500 hours per year Recordkeeping Annual Fence and Signs 14.2 See Condition I'1.2 14.1 All rental compressor engines used at this site shall not exceed 500 hours per year combined. The hours of operation of all rental compressor engines shall be monitored and recorded on an annual basis and made available for Division review upon request. If uncontrolled actual emissions from any one compressor engine will be greater than 1.0 tons per year of NOx or more at this site then that unit must get a Construction Permit from the Division prior to location at this facility (Colorado Construction Permit 03WE1151, as provided for under the provisions of Section I, Condition 1.3). 14.2 This facility shall be completely enclosed by a fence with no trespassing signs that preclude public access to this site as described in the modeling analysis for this facility (Colorado Construction Permit V3I�Y1E 1151, as ill kJ V IUQU llll ullldel the ply Ij1Vrin of JeLLIVI 11, L.VIlUILIUII 1.3). Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Page 55 SECTION III - Permit Shield Regulation No. 3, 5 CCR 1001-5, Part C, §§ f.A.4, V.D. & XIIi.B; § 25-7-114.4(3)(a), C.R.S. 1. Specific Non -Applicable Requirements Based on the information available to the Division and supplied by the applicant, the following parameters and requirements have been specifically identified as non -applicable to the facility to which this permit has been issued. This shield does not protect the source from any violations that occurred prior to or at the time of permit issuance. In addition, this shield does not protect the source from any violations that occur as a result of any modifications or reconstruction on which construction commenced prior to permit issuance. Emission Unit Description & Number Applicable Requirement Justification Point 001 & 002 Regulation 1, Section VI.A— Existing Sulfur Dioxide Emission Regulations Point 001 & 002 were constructed after August 11, 1977 J 2. General Conditions Compliance with this Operating Permit shall be deemed compliance with all applicable requirements specifically identified in the permit and other requirements specifically identified in the permit as not applicable to the source. This permit shield shall not alter or affect the following: 2.1 The provisions of §§ 25-7-112 and 25-7-113, C.R.S., or § 303 of the federal act, concerning enforcement in cases of emergency; 2.2 The liability of an owner or operator of a source for any violation of applicable requirements prior to or at the time of permit issuance; 2.3 The applicable requirements of the federal Acid Rain Program, consistent with § 408(a) of the federal act; 2.4 The ability of the Air Pollution Control Division to obtain information from a source pursuant to §25-7- 111(2)(I), C.R.S., or the ability of the Administrator to obtain information pursuant to § 114 of the federal act; 2.5 The ability of the Air Pollution Control Division to reopen the Operating Permit for cause pursuant to Regulation No. 3, Part C, § XIII. 2.6 Sources are not shielded from terms and conditions that become applicable to the source subsequent to permit issuance. 3. Stream -lined Conditions The following applicable requirements have been subsumed within this operating permit using the pertinent streamlining procedures approved by the U.S. EPA. For purposes of the permit shield, Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Page 56 compliance with the listed permit conditions will also serve as a compliance demonstration for purposes of the associated subsumed requirements. Permit Condition Streamlined (Subsumed) Requirements Section II, Condition 1.9 Colorado Regulation No. 6, Part B, Section TIM [New Manufacturing Processes Standards for Sulfur Dioxide] Section 11, Condition 1.7 Colorado Regulation No. 6, Part B, Section III.C.2 [New Manufacturing Processes Standards for Particulate Matter] Section II, Condition 2.4 Colorado Regulation No. 6, Part B, Section 11I.C.2 [New Manufacturing Processes Standards for Particulate Matter] Section 11, Condition 3.4 Colorado Regulation No. 6, Part B, Section III.C.2 [New Manufacturing Processes Standards for Particulate Matted Section II, Condition 4.4 Colorado Regulation No. 6, Part B, Section III.C.2 [New Manufacturing Processes Standards for Particulate Matter] Se, tinn ITCe,nrlitinn 7.5 Cnlnrarin Re ilatinn Nn_ 6 Part R Sprtinn TTT_C..9 [New Maniifarhirina Processes Standards for Particulate Matter] Section I1, Condition 13.4 Colorado Regulation No. 6, Part B, Section 1IT.C.2 [New Manufacturing Processes Standards for Particulate Matter] Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 1. Administrative Changes Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. SECTION IV - General Permit Conditions (ver 5/22/2012) Page 57 Regulation No. 3, 5 CCR 1001-5. Part A. § III. The pennittee shall submit an application for an administrative permit amendment to the Division for those permit changes that arc described in Regulation No. 3, Part A, §1.B.1. The pennittee may immediately make the change upon submission of the application to the Division. 2. Certification Requirements Regulation No. 3. 5 CCR 1001-5, Part C., by 111.13.9., V.C.16.a.& e. and V.C.17. a. Any application, report, document and compliance certification submitted to the Air Pollution Control Division pursuant to Regulation No. 3 or the Operating Permit shall contain a certification by a responsible official of the truth, accuracy and completeness of such form, report or certification stating that, based on information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, the statements and information in the document are true, accurate and complete. b. All compliance certifications for terms and conditions in the Operating Permit shall be submitted to the Air Pollution Control Division at least annually unless a more frequent period is specified in the applicable requirement or by the Division in the Operating Permit. c. Compliance certifications shall contain: (i) the identification of each permit term and condition that is the basis of the certification; (ii) the compliance status of the source; (iii) whether compliance was continuous or intermittent; (iv) method(s) used for determining the compliance status of the source, currently and over the reporting period; and (v) such other facts as the Air Pollution Control Division may require to determine the compliance status of the source. d. All compliance certifications shall be submitted to the Air Pollution Control Division and to the Environmental Protection Agency at the addresses listed in Appendix D of this Permit. e. If the pennittee is required to develop and register a risk management plan pursuant to § 1 I2(r) of the federal act, the permittee shall certify its compliance with that requirement; the Operating Permit shall not incorporate the contents of the risk management plan as a permit term or condition. 3. Common Provisions Common Provisions Regulation, 5 CCR 1001-2 §` 1LA., ll.B.. ILC., IE.E., EI.P., lL€, and Eli a. To Control Emissions Leaving Colorado When emissions generated from sources in Colorado cross the State boundary line, such emissions shall not cause the air quality standards of the receiving State to be exceeded, provided reciprocal action is taken by the receiving State. Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Page 58 b. Emission Monitoring Requirements The Division may require owners or operators of stationary air pollution sources to install, maintain, and use instrumentation to monitor and record emission data as a basis for periodic reports to the Division. c. Performance Testing The owner or operator of any air pollution source shall, upon request of the Division, conduct performance test(s) and furnish the Division a written report of the results of such test(s) in order to determine compliance with applicable emission control regulations. Performance test(s) shall be conducted and the data reduced in accordance with the applicable reference test methods unless the Division: (i) specifies or approves, in specific cases, the use of a test method with minor changes in methodology; (ii) approves the use of an equivalent method; (iii) approves the use of an alternative method the results of which the Division has determined to he adequate for indicating where a specific source is in compliance; or (iv) waives the requirement for performance test(s) because the owner or operator of a source has demonstrated by other means to the Division's satisfaction that the affected facility is in compliance with the standard. Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to abrogate the Commission's or Division's authority to require testing under the Colorado Revised Statutes, Title 25, Article 7, and pursuant to regulations promulgated by the Commission. Compliance test(s) shall be conducted under such conditions as the Division shall specify to the plant operator based on representative performance of the affected facility. The owner or operator shall make available to the Division such records as may be necessary to determine the conditions of the performance test(s). Operations during period of startup, shutdown, and malfunction shalt not constitute representative conditions of performance test(s) unless otherwise specified in the applicable standard. The owner or operator of an affected facility shall provide the Division thirty days prior notice of the performance test to afford the Division the opportunity to have an observer present. The Division may waive the thirty day notice requirement provided that arrangements satisfactory to the Division are made for earlier testing. The owner or operator of an affected facility shall provide, or cause to be provided, performance testing facilities as follows: (i) Sampling ports adequate for test methods applicable to such facility; (ii) Safe sampling platform(s); (iii) Safe access to sampling platform(s); and (iv) Utilities for sampling and testing equipment. Each performance test shall consist of at least three separate runs using the applicable test method. Each run shall be conducted for the time and under the conditions specified in the applicable standard. For the purpose of determining compliance with an applicable standard, the arithmetic mean of results of at least three runs shall apply. In the event that a sample is accidentally lost or conditions occur in which one of the runs must be discontinued because of forced shutdown, failure of an irreplaceable portion of the sample train, extreme meteorological conditions, or other circumstances beyond the owner or operator's control, compliance may, upon the Division's approval, be determined using the arithmetic mean of the results of the two other runs. Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Page 59 Nothing in this section shall abrogate the Division's authority to conduct its own performance test(s) if so warranted. d. Affirmative Defense Provision for Excess Emissions during Malfunctions An affirmative defense to a claim of violation under these regulations is provided to owners and operators for civil penalty actions for excess emissions during periods of malfunction. To establish the affirmative defense and to be relieved of a civil penalty in any action to enforce an applicable requirement, the owner or operator of the facility must meet the notification requirements below in a timely manner and prove by a preponderance of evidence that: (r) The excess emissions were caused by a sudden, unavoidable breakdown of equipment, or a sudden, unavoidable failure of a process to operate in the normal or usual manner, beyond the reasonable control of the owner or operator; (ii) The excess emissions did not stem from any activity or event that could have reasonably been foreseen and avoided, or planned for, and could not have been avoided by better operation and maintenance practices; (iii) Repairs were made as expeditiously as possible when the applicable emission limitations were being exceeded; (iv) The amount and duration of the excess emissions (including any bypass) were minimized to the maximum extent practicable during periods of such emissions; (v) All reasonably possible steps were taken to minimize the impact of the excess emissions on ambient air quality; (vi) All emissions monitoring systems were kept in operation (if at all possible); (vii) The owner or operator's actions during the period of excess emissions were documented by properly signed, contemporaneous operating logs or other relevant evidence; (viii) The excess emissions were not part of a recurring pattern indicative of inadequate design, operation, or maintenance; (ix) At all times, the facility was operated in a manner consistent with good practices for minimizing emissions. This section is intended solely to be a factor in determining whether an affirmative defense is available to an owner or operator, and shall not constitute an additional applicable requirement; and (x) During the period of excess emissions, there were no exceedances of the relevant ambient air quality standards established in the Commissions' Regulations that could be attributed to the emitting source. The owner or operator of the facility experiencing excess emissions during a malfunction shall notify the division verbally as soon as possible, but no later than noon of the Division's next working day, and shall submit written notification following the initial occurrence of the excess emissions by the end of the source's next reporting period. The notification shall address the criteria set forth above. The Affirmative Defense Provision contained in this section shall not be available to claims for injunctive relief. The Affirmative Defense Provision does not apply to failures to meet federally promulgated performance standards or emission limits, including, but not limited to, new source performance standards and national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants. The affirmative defense provision does not apply to state implementation plan (sip) limits or permit limits that have been set taking into account potential emissions during malfunctions, including, but not necessarily limited to, certain limits with 30 -day or longer averaging times, limits that indicate they apply during malfunctions, and limits that indicate they apply at all times or without exception. Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 e. Circumvention Clause Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Page 60 A person shall not build, erect, install, or use any article, machine, equipment, condition, or any contrivance, the use of which, without resulting in a reduction in the total release of air pollutants to the atmosphere, reduces or conceals an emission which would otherwise constitute a violation of this regulation. No person shall circumvent this regulation by using more openings than is considered normal practice by the industry or activity in question. f. Compliance Certifications g. For the purpose of submitting compliance certifications or establishing whether or not a person has violated or is in violation of any standard in the Colotado State Implementation Plan, nothing in the Colorado State Implementation Plan shall preclude the use, including the exclusive use, of any credible evidence or information, relevant to whether a source would have been in compliance with applicable requirements if the appropriate performance or compliance test or procedure had been performed. Evidence that has the effect of making any relevant standard or permit term more stringent shall not be credible for proving a violation of the standard or permit term. When compliance or non-compliance is demonstrated by a test or procedure provided by permit or other applicable requirement, the owner or operator shall be presumed to be in compliance or non-compliance unless other relevant credible evidence overcomes that presumption. Affirmative Defense Provision for Excess Emissions During Startup and Shutdown An affirmative defense is provided to owners and operators for civil penalty actions for excess emissions during periods of startup and shutdown. To establish the affirmative defense and to be relieved of a civil penalty in any action to enforce an applicable requirement, the owner or operator of the facility must meet the notification requirements below in a timely manner and prove by a preponderance of the evidence that: (i) The periods of excess emissions that occurred during startup and shutdown were short and infrequent and could not have been prevented through careful planning and design; (ii) The excess emissions were not part of a recurring pattern indicative of inadequate design, operation or maintenance; (iii) If the excess emissions were caused by a bypass (an intentional diversion of control equipment), then the bypass was unavoidable to prevent loss of life, personal injury, or severe property damage; (iv) The frequency and duration of operation in startup and shutdown periods were minimized to the maximum extent practicable; (v) All possible steps were taken to minimize the impact of excess emissions on ambient air quality; (vi) All emissions monitoring systems were kept in operation (if at all possible); (vii) The owner or operator's actions during the period of excess emissions were documented by properly signed, contemporaneous operating logs or other relevant evidence; and, (viii) At all times, the facility was operated in a manner consistent with good practices for minimizing emissions. This subparagraph is intended solely to be a factor in determining whether an affirmative defense is available to an owner or operator, and shall not constitute an additional applicable requirement. The owner or operator of the facility experiencing excess emissions during startup and shutdown shall notify the Division verbally as soon as possible, but no later than two (2) hours after the start of the next working day, and shall submit written quarterly notification following the initial occurrence of the excess emissions. The notification shall address the criteria set forth above. The Affirmative Defense Provision contained in this section shall not be available to claims for injunctive relief. Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Page 61 The Affirmative Defense Provision does not apply to State Implementation Plan provisions or other requirements that derive from new source pertbrmance standards or national emissions standards for hazardous air pollutants, or any other federally enforceable performance standard or emission limit with an averaging time greater than twenty- four hours. In addition, an affirmative defense cannot be used by a single source or small group of sources where the excess emissions have the potential to cause an exceedance of the ambient air quality standards or Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) increments. In making any determination whether a source established an affirmative defense, the Division shall consider the information within the notification required above and any other information the Division deems necessary, which may include, but is not limited to, physical inspection of the facility and review of documentation pertaining to the maintenance and operation of process and air pollution control equipment. 4. Compliance Requirements Regulation No. 3, 5 CC'R 1001-5. Part C. §§ IIl.C.9., V.C'. I I. & 16.d. and § 25-7-122.1(?), C.R.S. a. The permittec must comply with all conditions of the Operating Permit. Any permit noncompliance relating to federally -enforceable terms or conditions constitutes a violation of the federal act, as well as the state act and Regulation No. 3. Any permit noncompliance relating to state -only terms or conditions constitutes a violation of the state act and Regulation No. 3, shall be enforceable pursuant to state law, and shall not be enforceable by citizens under § 304 of the federal act. Any such violation of the federal act, the state act or regulations implementing either statute is grounds for enforcement action, for permit termination, revocation and reissuance or modification or for denial of a permit renewal application. b. It shall not be a defense for a permittee in an enforcement action or a consideration in favor of a permittee in a permit termination, revocation or modification action or action denying a permit renewal application that it would have been necessary to halt or reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain compliance with the conditions of the permit. c. The permit may be modified, revoked, reopened, and reissued, or terminated for cause. The filing of any request by the permittee for a permit modification, revocation and reissuance, or termination, or any notification of planned changes or anticipated noncompliance does not stay any permit condition, except as provided in §§ X. and Xi. of Regulation No. 3, Part C. d. The permittee shall famish to the Air Pollution Control Division, within a reasonable time as specified by the Division, any information that the Division may request in writing to determine whether cause exists for modifying, revoking and reissuing, or terminating the permit or to determine compliance with the permit. Upon request, the permittee shall also furnish to the Division copies of records required to be kept by the permittee, including information claimed to be confidential. Any information subject to a claim of confidentiality shall be specifically identified and submitted separately from information not subject to the claim. e. Any schedule for compliance for applicable requirements with which the source is not in compliance at the time of permit issuance shall be supplemental, and shall not sanction noncompliance with, the applicable requirements on which it is based. f. For any compliance schedule for applicable requirements with which the source is not in compliance at the time of permit issuance, the permittee shall submit, at least every 6 months unless a more frequent period is specified in the applicable requirement or by the Air Pollution Control Division, progress reports which contain the following: (i) dates for achieving the activities, milestones, or compliance required in the schedule for compliance, and dates when such activities, milestones, or compliance were achieved; and (ii) an explanation of why any dates in the schedule of compliance were not or will not be met, and any preventive or corrective measures adopted. Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit /1 06OPWE289 E289 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Page 62 g. The permittee shall not knowingly falsify, tamper with, or render inaccurate any monitoring device or method required to be maintained or followed under the terms and conditions of the Operating Permit. 5. Emergency Provisions Regulation No. 3. 5 CCR 1001-5. Part C. § VILE An emergency means any situation arising from sudden and reasonably unforeseeable events beyond the control of the source, including acts of God, which situation requires immediate corrective action to restore normal operation, and that causes the source to exceed the technology -based emission limitation under the permit due to unavoidable increases in emissions attrihutahle to the emergency. "Emergency" does not include noncompliance to the extent caused by improperly designed equipment, lack of preventative maintenance, careless or improper operation, or operator error. An emergency constitutes an affirmative defense to an enforcement action brought for noncompliance with a technology -based emission limitation if the permittee demonstrates, through properly signed, contemporaneous operating logs, or other relevant evidence that: a. an emergency occurred and that the permittee can identify the cause(s) of the emergency; h tha narmittad f rilih, was nt the time hpinn nrnnPrl., nncrntcd• c. during the period of the emergency the permittee took all reasonable steps to minimize levels of emissions that exceeded the emission standards, or other requirements in the permit; and d. the permittee submitted oral notice of the emergency to the Air Pollution Control Division no later than noon of the next working day following the emergency, and followed by written notice within one month of the time when emissions limitations were exceeded due to the emergency. This notice must contain a description of the emergency, any steps taker, t._ mitigate emissions, and ....mect6.c __t:_.._ tar_.. taro Stacy, any steps rancor to mitigate curmoruuo, and can curve actions taken. This emergency provision is in addition to any emergency or malfunction provision contained in any applicable requirement. 6. Emission Controls for Asbestos ReeniationNo. 8.5 CCR 1001-I0. Part fi The permittee shall not conduct any asbestos abatement activities except in accordance with the provisions of Regulation No. 8, Part B, "asbestos control." 7. Emissions Trading, Marketable Permits, Economic Incentives Regulation No. 3, 5 CCR 1001-5, Part C. § ‘1.C.13. No permit revision shall be required under any approved economic incentives, marketable permits, emissions trading and other similar programs or processes for changes that are specifically provided for in the permit. 8. Fee Payment C.R.S §§ 25-7-114.If61 and 25-7-I 14.7 a. The permittee shall pay an annual emissions fee in accordance with the provisions of C.R.S. § 25-7-114.7. A 1% per month late payment fee shall be assessed against any invoice amounts not paid in full on the 91st day after the date of invoice, unless a permittee has filed a timely protest to the invoice amount. b. The permittee shall pay a permit processing fee in accordance with the provisions of C.R.S. § 25-7-114.7. If the Division estimates that processing of the permit will take more than 30 hours, it will notify the permittee of its estimate of what the actual charges may be prior to commencing any work exceeding the 30 hour limit. Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Page 63 c. The permittee shall pay an APEN fee in accordance with the provisions of C.A.S. § 25-7-114.1(6) for each APEN or revised APEN filed. 9. Fugitive Particulate Emissions Regulation No. 1. 5 CCR 1001-3.1 11ID.I. The permittee shall employ such control measures and operating procedures as are necessary to minimize fugitive particulate emissions into the atmosphere, in accordance with the provisions of Regulation No. 1, § III.D.1. 10. Inspection and Entry Regulation No.).5 CUR 1001-5. Part C. iS V.C.!CO). Upon presentation of credentials and other documents as may be required by law, the permittee shall allow the Air Pollution Control Division, or any authorized representative, to perform the following: a. enter upon the permittee's premises where an Operating Permit source is located, or emissions -related activity is conducted, or where records must be kept under the terms of the permit; b. have access to, and copy, at reasonable times, any records that must be kept under the conditions of the permit; c. inspect at reasonable times any facilities, equipment (including monitoring and air pollution control equipment), practices, or operations regulated or required under the Operating Permit; d. sample or monitor at reasonable times, for the purposes of assuring compliance with the Operating Permit or applicable requirements, any substances or parameters. 11. Minor Permit Modifications Regulation No. 3, 5 CCR 1001-5, Part C, §§ X. & Xl. The permittee shall submit an application for a minor permit modification before making the change requested in the application. The permit shield shall not extend to minor permit modifications. 12. New Source Review Regulation No. 3. 5 CCR 1901-5. Part B The permittee shall not commence construction or modification of a source required to be reviewed under the New Source Review provisions of Regulation No. 3, Part B, without first receiving a construction permit. 13. No Property Rights Conveyed Regulation No. 3. 5 CCR 1001-5, Part C, § V.U.I I.d. This permit does not convey any property rights of any sort, or any exclusive privilege. 14. Odor Regulation No. 2, 5 CUR 1001-4, Part A As a matter of state law only, the permittee shall comply with the provisions of Regulation No. 2 concerning odorous emissions. Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 15. Off -Permit Changes to the Source Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Page 64 Regulation No. 3, 5 CCR 1001-5. Part C, X11.11. The permittee shall record any off -permit change to the source that causes the emissions of a regulated pollutant subject to an applicable requirement, but not otherwise regulated under the permit, and the emissions resulting from the change, including any other data necessary to show compliance with applicable ambient air quality standards. The permittee shall provide contemporaneous notification to the Air Pollution Control Division and to the Environmental Protection Agency at the addresses listed in Appendix D of this Permit. The permit shield shall not apply to any off -permit change. 16. Opacity Regulation No. I. 5 CCR 1001-3. $o I.. II. The pennittee shall comply with the opacity emissions limitation set forth in Regulation No. 1, §§ I.- ii. 17. Open Burning Regulation No. 9. 5 CCR 1001-1 I The permittee shall obtain a permit from the Division for any regulated open burning activities in accordance with provisions of Regulation No. 9. 18. Ozone Depleting Compounds Regulation No. 15.5 C.CR 1001-17 The permittee shall comply with the provisions of Regulation No. 15 concerning emissions of ozone depleting compounds. Sections 1., 11.C., 11.D., Ill. IV., and V. of Regulation No. 15 shall be enforced as a matter of state law only. 19. Permit Expiration and Renewal Regulation No. 3, 5 CCR 1001-S. Pad C, §§ 111.8.6.. IV.C., V.C.2. a. The permit term shall be five (5) years. The permit shall expire at the end of its term. Permit expiration terminates the permittee's right to operate unless a timely and complete renewal application is submitted. b. Applications for renewal shall be submitted at least twelve months, but not more than 18 months, prior to the expiration of the Operating Permit. An application for permit renewal may address only those portions of the permit that require revision, supplementing, or deletion, incorporating the remaining permit terms by reference from the previous permit. A copy of any materials incorporated by reference must be included with the application. 20. Portable Sources Regulation No. 3.5 CCR 1001-5. Part C, II.D. Portable Source permittees shall notify the Air Pollution Control Division at least 10 days in advance of each change in location. 21. Prompt Deviation Reporting Regulation No. 3. 5 CCR 1001-5_ Pan C. § V.C.7.b. The permittee shall promptly report any deviation from permit requirements, including those attributable to malfunction conditions as defined in the permit, the probable cause of such deviations, and any corrective actions or preventive measures taken. "Prompt" is defined as follows: Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Page 65 a. Any definition of"prompt" or a specific timeframe for reporting deviations provided in an underlying applicable requirement as identified in this permit; or b. Where the underlying applicable requirement fails to address the time frame for reporting deviations, reports of deviations will be submitted based on the following schedule: (t) For emissions of a hazardous air pollutant or a toxic air pollutant (as identified in the applicable regulation) that continue for more than an hour in excess of permit requirements, the report shall be made within 24 hours of the occurrence; (ii) For emissions of any regulated air pollutant, excluding a hazardous air pollutant or a toxic air pollutant that continue for more than two hours in excess of permit requirements, the report shall be made within 48 hours; and (Hi) For all other deviations from permit requirements, the report shall be submitted every six (6) months, except as otherwise specified by the Division in the permit in accordance with paragraph 22.d. below. c. If any of the conditions in paragraphs b.i or b.ii above are met, the source shall notify the Division by telephone (303-692-3155) or facsimile (303-782-0278) based on the timetables listed above. [Explanatory note: Notification by telephone or facsimile must specify that this notification is a deviation report for an Operating Permit] A written notice, certified consistent with General Condition 2.a. above (Certification Requirements), shall be submitted within 10 working days of the occurrence. All deviations reported under this section shall also be identified in the 6 -month report required above. "Prompt reporting" does not constitute an exception to the requirements of "Emergency Provisions" for the purpose of avoiding enforcement actions. 22. Record Keeping and Reporting Requirements Regulation No. 3. 5 CCR 1001-5.. Part A. y+' II.; Part C, fiy V.C.G.. V.C.7. a. Unless otherwise provided in the source specific conditions of this Operating Permit, the permittee shall maintain compliance monitoring records that include the following information: (i) date, place as defined in the Operating Permit, and time of sampling or measurements; (H) date(s) on which analyses were performed; (Hi) the company or entity that performed the analysis; (iv) the analytical techniques or methods used; (v) the results of such analysis; and (vi) the operating conditions at the time of sampling or measurement. b. The permittee shall retain records of all required monitoring data and support information for a period of at least five (5) years from the date of the monitoring sample, measurement, report or application. Support information, for this purpose, includes all calibration and maintenance records and all original strip -chart recordings for continuous monitoring instrumentation, and copies of all reports required by the Operating Permit. With prior approval of the Air Pollution Control Division, the permittee may maintain any of the above records in a computerized form. c. Permittees must retain records of all required monitoring data and support information for the most recent twelve (12) month period, as well as compliance certifications for the past five (5) years on -site at all times. A permittee shall make available for the Air Pollution Control Division's review all other records of required monitoring data and support information required to be retained by the permittee upon 48 hours advance notice by the Division. Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Page 66 d. The permittee shall submit to the Air Pollution Control Division all reports of any required monitoring at least every six (6) months, unless an applicable requirement, the compliance assurance monitoring rule, or the Division requires submission on a more frequent basis. All instances of deviations from any permit requirements must be clearly identified in such reports. e. The pennittee shall file an Air Pollutant Emissions Notice ("APEN") prior to constructing, modifying, or altering any facility, process, activity which constitutes a stationary source from which air pollutants are or are to be emitted, unless such source is exempt from the APEN filing requirements of Regulation No. 3, Part A, § Il.D. A revised APEN shall be filed annually whenever a significant change in emissions, as defined in Regulation No. 3, Part A, § II.C.2., occurs; whenever there is a change in owner or operator of any facility, process, or activity; whenever new control equipment is installed; whenever a different type of control equipment replaces an existing typc of control equipment; whenever a permit limitation must be modified; or before the APEN expires. An APEN is valid for a period of five years. The five-year period recommences when a revised APEN is received by the Air Pollution Control Division. Revised APENs shall he submitted no later than 30 days before the five-year term expires. Permittees submitting revised APENs to inform the Division of a change in actual emission rates must do so by '1 iv ..C the following ing year. nc d the _ uc filed long w'ci April w of the ivuuwmg yca�. Where a permit re - vision i5 required, tirt revised APEN must uc i��cu along with a request for permit revision. APENs for changes in control equipment must be submitted before the change occurs. Annual fees are based on the most recent APEN on file with the Division. 23. Reopenings for Cause Reuuiation No. 3. 5 CCR 1001-5. Part C, $ Xlil. a. The Air Pollution Control Division shall reopen, revise, and reissue Operating Permits; permit reopenings and reissuance shall be processed using the procedures set forth in Regulation No. 3, Part C, § Ill., except that proceedings to reopen and reissue permits affect only those parts of the permit for which cause to reopen exists. b. The Division shall reopen a permit whenever additional applicable requirements become applicable to a major source with a remaining permit term of three or more years, unless the effective date of the requirements is later than the date on which the permit expires, or unless a general permit is obtained to address the new requirements; whenever additional requirements (including excess emissions requirements) become applicable to an affected source under the acid rain program; whenever the Division determines the permit contains a material mistake or that inaccurate statements were made in establishing the emissions standards or other terms or conditions of the permit; or whenever the Division determines that the permit must be revised or revoked to assure compliance with an applicable requirement. c. The Division shall provide 30 days' advance notice to the permittee of its intent to reopen the permit, except that a shorter notice may be provided in the case of an emergency. d. The permit shield shall extend to those parts of the permit that have been changed pursuant to the reopening and reissuance procedure. 24. Section 502(b)(10) Changes Regulation No. 3, 5 CCR 1001-5, Part C. § X [.A. The permittee shall provide a minimum 7 -day advance notification to the Air Pollution Control Division and to the Environmental Protection Agency at the addresses listed in Appendix D of this Permit. The permittee shall attach a copy of each such notice given to its Operating Permit. Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 25. Severability Clause Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Page 67 Reculation No. 3, 5 CCR IDPI-5, Part C. $ V.C.10. In the event of a challenge to any portion of the permit, all emissions limits, specific and general conditions, monitoring, record keeping and reporting requirements of the permit, except those being challenged, remain valid and enforceable. 26. Significant Permit Modifications Regulation No. 3. 5 CCR 1001-5. Part C. t 111.13.2. The permittee shall not make a significant modification required to be reviewed under Regulation No. 3, Part B ("Construction Permit" requirements) without first receiving a construction permit. The permittee shall submit a complete Operating Permit application or application for an Operating Permit revision for any new or modified source within twelve months of commencing operation, to the address listed in Item 1 in Appendix D of this permit. If the permittee chooses to use the "Combined Construction/Operating Permit" application procedures of Regulation No. 3, Part C, then the Operating Permit must be received prior to commencing construction of the new or modified source. 27. Special Provisions Concerning the Acid Rain Program Regulation No. 3, 5 CCR 1001-5, Part C, §§ V.C.1.b. & 8 a. Where an applicable requirement of the federal act is more stringent than an applicable requirement of regulations promulgated under Title IV of the federal act, 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 72, both provisions shall be incorporated into the permit and shall be federally enforceable. b. Emissions exceeding any allowances that the source lawfully holds under Title IV of the federal act or the regulations promulgated thereunder, 40 CFR Part 72, are expressly prohibited. 28. Transfer or Assignment of Ownership Rebulation No. 3, 5 CCR 1001-5. Part C. * ILC. No transfer or assignment of ownership of the Operating Permit source will be effective unless the prospective owner or operator applies to the Air Pollution Control Division on Division -supplied Administrative Permit Amendment forms, for reissuance of the existing Operating Permit. No administrative permit shall be complete until a written agreement containing a specific date for transfer of permit, responsibility, coverage, and liability between the permittee and the prospective owner or operator has been submitted to the Division. 29. Volatile Organic Compounds Regulation No. 7. 5 CCR 1001-9, $1 [ll & V The requirements in paragraphs a, b and e apply to sources located in an ozone non -attainment area or the Denver 1 -hour ozone attainment/maintenance area. The requirements in paragraphs c and d apply statewide. a. All storage tank gauging devices, anti -rotation devices, accesses, seals, hatches, roof drainage systems, support structures, and pressure relief valves shall be maintained and operated to prevent detectable vapor loss except when opened, actuated, or used for necessary and proper activities (e.g. maintenance). Such opening, actuation, or use shall be limited so as to minimize vapor loss. Detectable vapor loss shall be determined visually, by touch, by presence of odor, or using a portable hydrocarbon analyzer. When an analyzer is used, detectable vapor loss means a VOC concentration exceeding 10,000 ppm. Testing shall be conducted as in Regulation No. 7, Section VIII.C.3. b. Except when otherwise provided by Regulation No. 7, all volatile organic compounds, excluding petroleum liquids, transferred to any tank, container, or vehicle compartment with a capacity exceeding 212 liters (56 gallons), shall be Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit # 06OPWE289 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Page 68 transferred using submerged or bottom filling equipment. For top loading, the fill tube shall reach within six inches of the bottom of the tank compartment. For bottom -fill operations, the inlet shall be flush with the tank bottom. c. The permittee shall not dispose of volatile organic compounds by evaporation or spillage unless Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) is utilized. d. No owner or operator of a bulk gasoline terminal, bulk gasoline plant, or gasoline dispensing facility as defined in Colorado Regulation No. 7, Section VI, shall permit gasoline to be intentionally spilled, discarded in sewers, stored in open containers, or disposed of in any other manner that would result in evaporation. e. Beer production and associated beer container storage and transfer operations involving volatile organic compounds with a true vapor pressure of less than 1.5 PSIA actual conditions are exempt from the provisions of paragraph b, above. 30. Wood Stoves and Wood burning Appliances Re9ulation No. 4, 5 CCR 1001-6 The permittee shall comply with the provisions of Regulation No. 4 concerning the advertisement, sale, installation, and use of wood stoves and wood burning appliances. Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE 11 Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Appendices OPERATING PERMIT APPENDICES A - INSPECTION INFORMATION B - MONITORING AND PERMIT DEVIATION REPORT C - COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION REPORT D - NOTIFICATION ADDRESSES E - PERMIT ACRONYMS F - PERMIT MODIFICATIONS *DISCLAIMER: None of the information found in these Appendices shall be considered to be State or Federally enforceable, except as otherwise provided in the permit, and is presented to assist the source, permitting authority, inspectors, and citizens. Operating Permit 06OPWE289 E289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Inspection Information APPENDIX A - Inspection Information 1. Directions to Plant: Traveling North on I-25 N, take exit 259 for Crossroads Boulevard, travel - 47.7 miles From exit 259, keep right at the fork and merge onto E Cross Roads Blvd, travel — 5.6 miles Turn left onto CO -257 N, travel -- 1.7 miles Turn right onto Eastman Park Dr, travel — 2.2 miles Turn left in to Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Safety Equipment Required: Hard Hat Safety Shoes safety Glasses Hearing Protection 3. Facility Plot Plan: Appendix A Page 70 The attached Figure (following page) shows the plot plan as submitted in the August 11, 2006 Title V Onerating Permit Annlieeatinn, 4. List of insignificant Activities: The following list of insignificant activities was provided by the source to assist in the understanding of ♦L_ f__ilit_. layout. Since a_ __.__t_ _ 1[_� activities _.___ L__._ _L_.._._J the facility �urcc ureic is no requirement w update such a list, acuvruc� may have cuarbcu since the last filing. The asterisk (*) denotes an insignificant activity source category based on the size of the activity, emissions levels from the activity or the production rate of the activity. The owner or operator of individual emission points in insignificant activity source categories marked with an asterisk (*) must maintain sufficient record keeping verifying that the exemption applies. Such records shall be made available for Division review upon request. (Colorado Regulation No. 3, Part C, Section lI.E) insignificant activities and/or sources of emissions identified by the permittee are as follows: *Units with emissions less than APEN de minimis — criteria pollutants (Reg 3, Part C.II.E.3.a) Point 004 — Four (4) Alcoves (1.7 MMBtu/hr each)1 Point 007 — Eight (8) Belt Burners (0.05 MMBtu/hr each) 1 Point 010 — Four (4) Pre -heat Mould Ovens (0.5 MMBtu/hr each)' Point 013 — Two (2) Diesel Fired Water Pumps (150 Hp) 1' 2 Point 014 —Eight (8) Bottle Coders Point 016 — Degreasers/Delivery Equipment Coating Point 022 — One (1) Cutlet Crusher Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Inspection Information Appendix A Page 71 "Each individual piece of fuel burning equipment, other than smokehouse generators and internal combustion engines. that uses gaseous fuel, and that has a design rate less than or equal to live million British thermal units per hour (5 MMBtu/hr) (Reg 3, Part C.II.E..3.k) Four (4) Water Heaters Point 005 —Four (4) Forehearths (3.16 MMBtu/hr each)' Vacuum cleaning systems used exclusively for industrial commercial. or residential housekeeping purposes (Reg 3 Part C.Il.E.3.ii) One (1) Hi -Vac dust collector Each individual piece ofiiiel hunting equipment that uses gaseous fuel, and that has a design rate Icss than or equal to ten million British thermal units per hour 10 MMBtu/hr). and that is used solely for heating huildines for personal con tort. (Reg 3, Part CI LE3.ggg) Space Heaters Notes: ' These emission sources are exempt under Regulation 3, Part C.II.E.3.a and Regulation 3, Part C.I1.E.3.k 'These emission sources are exempt under Regulation 3, Part C.II.E.3.a and Regulation 3, Part C.I1.E.3.xxx Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Inspection Information Appendix A Page 72 111 Ea dW 7 Q 0 f Li, / , s!.r )1'4 r"�,I .x : ,iri T�� ill '333pppA ' T i IIn. rry1�11 4 l • Il . /� y i S— ` l� y` I v �u I 4 'b l R 4 { //9 '';i B9 - �— � � I Sly J -I tt I�I .• AI, l E 3 Er - Ri Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Monitoring and Permit Deviation Report APPENDIX B Reporting Requirements and Definitions with codes ver 8/20/14 Appendix B Page 73 Please note that, pursuant to 113(c)(2) of the federal Clean Air Act, any person who knowingly: (A) makes any false material statement, representation, or certification in, or omits material information from, or knowingly alters, conceals, or fails to file or maintain any notice, application, record, report, plan, or other document required pursuant to the Act to be either filed or maintained (whether with respect to the requirements imposed by the Administrator or by a State); (B) fails to notify or report as required under the Act; or (C) falsifies, tampers with, renders inaccurate, or fails to install any monitoring device or method required to be maintained or followed under the Act shall, upon conviction, be punished by a fine pursuant to title 18 of the United States Code, or by imprisonment for not more than 2 years, or both. If a conviction of any person under this paragraph is for a violation committed after a first conviction of such person under this paragraph, the maximum punishment shall be doubled with respect to both the fine and imprisonment. The permittee must comply with all conditions of this operating permit. Any permit noncompliance constitutes a violation of the Act and is grounds for enforcement action; for permit termination, revocation and reissuance, or modification; or for denial of a permit renewal application. The Part 70 Operating Permit program requires three types of reports to be filed for all permits. All required reports must be certified by a responsible official. Report #1: Monitoring Deviation Report (due at least every six months) For purposes of this operating permit, the Division is requiring that the monitoring reports are due every six months unless otherwise noted in the permit. All instances of deviations from permit monitoring requirements must be clearly identified in such reports. For purposes of this operating permit, monitoring means any condition determined by observation, by data from any monitoring protocol, or by any other monitoring which is required by the permit as well as the recordkeeping associated with that monitoring. This would include, for example, fuel use or process rate monitoring, fuel analyses, and operational or control device parameter monitoring. Report #2: Permit Deviation Report (must be reported "promptly") In addition to the monitoring requirements set forth in the permits as discussed above, each and every requirement of the permit is subject to deviation reporting. The reports must address deviations from permit requirements, including those attributable to malfunctions as defined in this Appendix, the probable cause of such deviations, and any corrective actions or preventive measures taken. All Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Monitoring and Permit Deviation Report Appendix B Page 74 0) deviations from any term or condition of the permit arc required to be summarized or referenced in the annual compliance certification. For purposes of this operating permit, "malfunction" shall refer to both emergency conditions and malfunctions. Additional discussion on these conditions is provided later in this Appendix. For purposes of this operating permit, the Division is requiring that the permit deviation reports are due as set forth in General Condition 21. Where the underlying applicable requirement contains a definition of prompt or otherwise specifies a time frame for reporting deviations, that definition or time frame shall govern. For example, quarterly Excess Emission Reports required by an NSPS or Regulation No. I, Section IV. In addition to the monitoring deviations discussed above, included in the meaning of deviation for the purposes of this operating permit are any of the following: A situation where emissions exceed an emission limitation or standard contained in the permit; (2) A situation where process or control device parameter values demonstrate that an emission limitation or standard contained in the permit has not been met; (3) (4) A situation in which observations or data collected demonstrates noncompliance with an emission limitation or standard or any work practice or operating condition required by the permit; or, A situation in which an excursion or exceedance as defined in 40CFR Part 64 (the Compliance Assurance Monitoring (CAM) Rule) has occurred. (only if the emission point is subject to CAM) For reporting purposes, the Division has combined the Monitoring Deviation Report with the Permit Deviation Report. All deviations shall be reported using the following codes: 1 = Standard: 2 = Process: 3 = Monitor: 4 = Test: 5 = Maintenance: 6 = Record: 7 = Report: 8 = CAM: 9 = Other: When the requirement is an emission limit or standard When the requirement is a production/process limit When the requirement is monitoring When the requirement is testing When required maintenance is not performed When the requirement is recordkeeping When the requirement is reporting A situation in which an excursion or exceedance as defined in 40CFR Part 64 (the Compliance Assurance Monitoring (CAM) Rule) has occurred. When the deviation is not covered by any of the above categories Report #3: Compliance Certification (annually, as defined in the permit) Submission of compliance certifications with terms and conditions in the permit, including emission limitations, standards, or work practices, is required not less than annually. Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Monitoring and Permit Deviation Report Appendix B Page 75 Compliance Certifications are intended to state the compliance status of each requirement of the permit over the certification period. They must be based, at a minimum, on the testing and monitoring methods specified in the permit that were conducted during the relevant time period. In addition, if the owner or operator knows of other material information (i.e. information beyond required monitoring that has been specifically assessed in relation to how the information potentially affects compliance status), that information must be identified and addressed in the compliance certification. The compliance certification must include the following: • The identification of each term or condition of the permit that is the basis of the certification; • Whether or not the method(s) used by the owner or operator for determining the compliance status with each permit term and condition during the certification period was the method(s) specified in the permit. Such methods and other means shall include, at a minimum, the methods and means required in the permit. If necessary, the owner or operator also shall identify any other material information that must be included in the certification to comply with section 113(c)(2) of the Federal Clean Air Act, which prohibits knowingly making a false certification or omitting material information; • The status of compliance with the terms and conditions of the permit, and whether compliance was continuous or intermittent. The certification shall identify each deviation and take it into account in the compliance certification. Note that not all deviations arc considered violations.t • Such other facts as the Division may require, consistent with the applicable requirements to which the source is subject, to determine the compliance status of the source. The Certification shall also identify as possible exceptions to compliance any periods during which compliance is required and in which an excursion or exceedance as defined under 40 CFR Part 64 (the Compliance Assurance Monitoring (CAM) Rule) has occurred. (Only for emission points subject to CAM) Note the requirement that the certification shall identify each deviation and take it into account in the compliance certification. Previously submitted deviation reports, including the deviation report submitted at the time of the annual certification may be referenced in the compliance certification. For example, given the various emissions limitations and monitoring requirements to which a source may be subject, a deviation from one requirement may not be a deviation under another requirement which recognizes an exception and/or special circumstances relating to that same event. Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Monitoring and Permit Deviation Report Startup, Shutdown, Malfunctions and Emergencies, Appendix B Page 76 Understanding the application of Startup, Shutdown, Malfunctions and Emergency Provisions, is very important in both the deviation reports and the annual compliance certifications. Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunctions Please note that exceedances of some New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) and Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MAD) standards that occur during Startup, Shutdown or Malfunctions may not be considered to be non-compliance since emission limits or standards often.do not apply unless specifically stated in the NSPS. Such exceedances must, however, be reported as excess emissions per the NSPS/MACT rules and would still be noted in the deviation report. In regard to compliance certifications, the permittee should be confident of the information related to those deviations when making compliance determinations since they are subject to Division review. The concepts of Startup, Shutdown and Malfunctions also exist for Best Available Control Technology (RACT) sntlrr_es hut arc not applied in the came fachinn ac for INISYN and M A cr Qohirrec Emergency Provisions Under the Emergency provisions of Part 70 certain operational conditions may act as an affirmative defense against enforcement action if they are properly reported. DEFINITIONS Malfunction (NSPS) means any sudden, infrequent, and not reasonably preventable failure of air pollution control equipment, process equipment, or a process to operate in a normal or usual manner. Failures that are raiicrd in Hart by poor maintenan8e nr enrelecc nnerntinn ore not mannctinno Malfunction (SIP) means any sudden and unavoidable failure of air pollution control equipment or process equipment or unintended failure of a process to operate in a normal or usual manner. Failures that are primarily caused by poor maintenance, careless operation, or any other preventable upset condition or preventable equipment breakdown shall not be considered malfunctions. Emergency means any situation arising from sudden and reasonably unforeseeable events beyond the control of the source, including acts of God, which situation requires immediate corrective action to restore normal operation, and that causes the source to exceed a technology -based emission limitation under the permit, due to unavoidable increases in emissions attributable to the emergency. An emergency shall not include noncompliance to the extent caused by improperly designed equipment, lack of preventative maintenance, careless or improper operation, or operator error. Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Monitoring and Permit Deviation Report APPENDIX B: Monitoring and Permit Deviation Report - Part I Appendix B Page 77 1. Following is the required format for the Monitoring and Permit Deviation report to be submitted to the Division as set forth in General Condition 21. The Table below must be completed for all equipment or processes for which specific Operating Permit terms exist. 2. Part II of this Appendix B shows the format and information the Division will require for describing periods of monitoring and permit deviations, or malfunction or emergency conditions as indicated in the Table below. One Part II Form must be completed for each Deviation. Previously submitted reports (e.g. EER's or malfunctions) may be referenced and the form need not be filled out in its -entirety. FACILITY NAME: Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. OPERATING PERMIT NO: 06OPWE289 REPORTING PERIOD: (see first page of the permit for specific reporting period and dates) Operating Permit Unit ID Unit Description Deviations noted During Period?' Deviation Deviation Code Malfunction/Emergency Condition Reported During Period? YES NO YES NO 001 One (1) O -I Custom Built Natural Gas Glass Melting Furnace, rated at 57.35 MMBtu/hr 002 One (1) O -I Custom Built Natural Gas Glass Melting Furnace, rated at 57.35 MMBtu/hr 003 1'wo (2) O-1 Custom Built Refiners, rated at 10.58 MMBtu/hr 006 Four (4) Bowman 216" x 112' Gas Annealing Lehrs, rated at 32.0 MMBtu/hr 008 Five (5) O -I Custom Built Glass Forming Machines 009 Four (4) Tot End Surface Treatment (HEST) Systems 011 One (1) Caterpillar 3412CDITA Diesel Fired Compression Ignition Emergency Generator, rated at 823 HP 012 One (1) Caterpillar 3412CDITA Diesel Fired Compression Ignition Emergency Generator, rated at 823 HP 015 Three (3) Marsh VI Patrion Plus Carton Printing, Three (3) Nordson PRO Blue Hot Glue, and Four (4) O-1 Custom Built Cold End Spray 017 Mould Shop 018 Two (2) Cooling Towers 019 Three (3) Batch House Dust Collectors 020 Thirty -Three (33) Batch House Dust Collectors 021 Fugitive Dust Sources 024 One (1) Caterpillar C9 Diesel Fired Compression Ignition Emergency Generator, rated at 457 I-IP Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Monitoring and Permit Deviation Report Appendix B Page 78 Operating Permit Unit ID Unit Description Deviations noted During Period?' Deviation Code Malfunction/Emergency Condition Reported During Period? YES NO YES NO 025 Automatic Blank Lubrication (ABL) System General Conditions Insignificant Activities See previous discussion regarding what is considered to be a deviation. Determination of whether or no a deviation has occurred shall be based on a reasonable inquiry using readily available information. 2 Use the following entries, as appropriate 1 = Standard: 2 = Process: 1= Mnnitnr: 4 = Test: 5 = Maintenance: 6 = Record: 7 = Report: 8 — CAM: 9 = Other: 'When the rcgtiir"ciuent is an emission iimrit or Standard When the requirement is a production/process limit When the regiiirem. nt ;C nnnn:t„ring When the requirement is testing When required maintenance is not performed When the requirement is recordkeeping When the requirement is reporting A situation in which an excursion or exceedance as defined in 40CFR Part 64 (the Compliance Assurance Monitoring (CAM) Rule) has occurred. When the deviation is not covered by any of the above categories Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Monitoring and Permit Deviation Report APPENDIX B: Monitoring and Permit Deviation Report - Part II Appendix B Page 79 FACILITY NAME: Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. OPERATING PERMIT NO: 06OPWE289 REPORTING PERIOD: (see first page of the permit for specific reporting period and dates) Is the deviation being claimed as an: Emergency Malfunction N/A (For NSPS/MACT) Did the deviation occur during: Startup OPERATING PERMIT UNIT IDENTIFICATION: Operating Permit Condition Number Citation Normal Operation Explanation of Period of Deviation Duration (start/stop date & time) Action Taken to Correct the Problem Measures Taken to Prevent a Reoccurrence of the Problem Dates of Malfunctions/Emergencies Reported (if applicable) Shutdown Malfunction Deviation Code Division Code QA: Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Monitoring and Permit Deviation Report SEE EXAMPLE ON THE NEXT PAGE Appendix B Page 80 li Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Monitoring and Permit Deviation Report EXAMPLE FACILITY NAME: Acme Corp. OPERATING PERMIT NO: 96OPZZXXX REPORTING PERIOD: 1/1/04 - 6/30/06 Appendix B Page 81 Is the deviation being claimed as an: Emergency Malfunction XX N/A (For NSPS/MACT) Did the deviation occur during: Startup Shutdown Normal Operation OPERATING PERMIT UNIT IDENTIFICATION: Asphalt Plant with a Scrubber for Particulate Control - Unit XXX Operating Permit Condition Number Citation Section II, Condition 3.1 - Opacity Limitation Explanation of Period of Deviation Slurry Line Feed Plugged Duration START- 1730 4/10/06 END- 1800 4/10/06 Malfunction Action Taken to Correct the Problem Line Blown Out Measures Taken to Prevent Reoccurrence of the Problem Replaced Line Filter Dates of Mallunction/Emereencies Reported (if applicable) 5/30/06 to A. Einstein, APCD Deviation Code Division Code QA: Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Monitoring and Permit Deviation Report Appendix B Page 82 APPENDIX B: Monitoring and Permit Deviation Report - Part III REPORT CERTIFICATION SOURCE NAME: Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. FACILITY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 123-4406 PERMIT NUMBER: 06OPWE289 REPORTING PERIOD: (see first page of the permit for specific reporting period and dates) All information for the Title V Semi -Annual Deviation Reports must be certified by a responsible official as defined Colorado T_._._L]___ TT_ O n__1 n Section TTl This •r_____ J________ be LLGIIIICLL 111 Colorado Regulation IV V. Jp 141L !1� OCLAIV II L.U. LIIIJ signed lief L1114[LLI VII document must be packaged with the documents being submitted. STATEMENT OF COMPLETENESS I have reviewed the information being submitted in its entirety and, based on information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, I certify that the statements and information contained in this submittal are true, accurate and complete. Please note that the Colorado Statutes state that any person who knowingly, as defined in Sub -Section 18- 1-501(6), C.R.S., makes any false material statement, representation, or certification in this document is guilty of a misdemeanor and may be punished in accordance with the provisions of Sub -Section 25-7 122.1, C.R.S. Printed or Typed Name Title Signature of Responsible Official Date Signed Note: Deviation reports shall be submitted to the Division at the address given in Appendix D of this permit. No copies need be sent to the U.S. EPA. Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Compliance Certification Report Appendix C Page 83 APPENDIX C Required Format for Annual Compliance Certification Reports Following is the format for the Compliance Certification report to be submitted to the Division and the U.S. EPA annually based on the effective date of the permit. The Table below must be completed for all equipment or processes for which specific Operating Permit terms exist. FACILITY NAME: Owens -Brockway Glass Container, Inc. OPERATING PERMIT NO: 06OPWE289 REPORTING PERIOD: (see first page of the permit for specific reporting period and dates) I. Facility Status During the entire reporting period, this source was in compliance with ALL terms and conditions contained in the Permit, each term and condition of which is identified and included by this reference. The method(s) used to determine compliance is/are the method(s) specified in the Permit. With the possible exception of the deviations identified in the table below, this source was in compliance with all terms and conditions contained in the Permit, each term and condition of which is identified and included by this reference, during the entire reporting period. The method used to determine compliance for each term and condition is the method specified in the Permit, unless otherwise indicated and described in the deviation report(s). Note that not all deviations are considered violations. O eratin g P Permit Unit ID Unit Description Deviations Reported I Monitoring Pehrmrt?r Was compliance continuous or intermittent?s Previous Current YES NO Continuous Intermittent 001 One (1) O -I Custom Built Natural Gas Glass Melting Furnace, rated at 57.35 MMBtu/hr 002 One (1) O -I Custom Built Natural Gas Glass Melting Furnace, rated at 57.35 MMBtu/hr 003 Two (2) O -I Custom Built Refiners, rated at 10.58 MMBtu/hr 006 Four (4) Bowman 216" x 112' Gas Annealing Lehrs, rated at 32.0 MMBtu/hr 008 Five (5) O -I Custom Built Glass Forming Machines 009 Four (4) Hot End Surface Treatment (BEST) Systems 011 One (1) Caterpillar 3412CDITA Diesel Fired Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Compliance Certification Report Appendix C Page 84 Operating P g Permit Unit ID Unit Description Deviations Reported I Monitoring Method per Was compliance continuous or intermittenti3 Previous Current YES NO Continuous Intermittent Compression Ignition Emergency Generator, rated at 823 HP 012 One (1) Caterpillar 3412CDITA Diesel Fired Compression Ignition Emergency Generator, rated at 823 HP ni s "� Three (3) Marsh VII Palrion Plus Carton Printing, Three (3) Nordson PRO Blue Hot Glue, and Four (4) O -I Custom Built Cold End Spray 017 Mould Shop 018 Two (2) Cooling Towers 019 Three (3) Batch House Dust Collectors 020 Thirty -Three (33) Batch House Dust Collectors 021 Fugitive Dust Sources 024 One (1) Caterpillar C9 Diesel Fired Compression Ignition Emergency lenerator, rated at 4]7 I ll' _ 0" Automatic Blank Lubrication (ABL) System General Conditions Insignificant Activities 4 If deviations were noted in a previous deviation report , put an "X" under "previous" If deviations were noted in the current deviation report (i.e. for the last six months of the annual reporting period), put an "X" under "current". Mark both columns if both apply. 2 Note whether the method(s) used to determine the compliance status with each term and condition was the method(s) specified in the permit. If it was not, mark "no" and attach additional information/explanation. 3 Note whether the compliance status with of each term and condition provided was continuous or intermittent. "Intermittent Compliance" can mean either that noncompliance has occurred or that the owner or operator has data sufficient to certify compliance only on an intermittent basis. Certification of intermittent compliance therefore does not necessarily mean that any noncompliance has occurred. NOTE: The Periodic Monitoring requirements of the Operating Permit program rule are intended to provide assurance that even in the absence of a continuous system of monitoring the Title V source can demonstrate whether it has operated in continuous compliance for the duration of the reporting period. Therefore, if a source 1) conducts all of the monitoring and recordkeeping required in its permit, even if such activities are done periodically and not continuously, and if 2) such monitoring and recordkeeping does not Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Compliance Certification Report Appendix C Page 85 indicate non-compliance, and if 3) the Responsible Official is not aware of any credible evidence that indicates non-compliance, then the Responsible Official can certify that the emission point(s) in question were in continuous compliance during the applicable time period. 4 Compliance status for these sources shall be based on a reasonable inquiry using readily available information. II. Status for Accidental Release Prevention Program: A. This facility is subject is not subject to the provisions of the Accidental Release Prevention Program (Section 112(r) of the Federal Clean Air Act) B. If subject: The facility requirements of section 112(r). is is not in compliance with all the 1. A Risk Management Plan will be has been submitted to the appropriate authority and/or the designated central location by the required date. III. Certification All information for the Annual Compliance Certification must be certified by a responsible official as defined in Colorado Regulation No. 3, Part A, Section 1.B. This signed certification document must be packaged with the documents being submitted. I have reviewed this certification in its entirety and, based on information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, I certify that the statements and information contained in this certification are true, accurate and complete. Please note that the Colorado Statutes state that any person who knowingly, as defined in § 18-1-501(6), C.R.S., makes any false material statement, representation, or certification in this document is guilty of a misdemeanor and may be punished in accordance with the provisions of § 25-7 122.1, C.R.S. Printed or Typed Name Title Signature Date Signed NOTE: All compliance certifications shall be submitted to the Air Pollution Control Division and to the Environmental Protection Agency at the addresses listed in Appendix D of this Permit. Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Notification Addresses Appendix D Page 86 APPENDIX D Notification Addresses ver 2/5/14 1. Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division Operating Permits Unit APCD-SS-B 1 4300 Cherry Creek Drive S. Denver, CO 80246-1530 ATTN: Matt Burgett 2. United States Environmental Protection Agency Compliance Notifications: Office of Enforcement, Compliance and Environmental Justice Mail Code OE'INr-A T U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region VIII 1595 Wynkoop Street Deliver, CO OV2OG-11L7 502(b)(10) Changes, Off Permit Changes: Office of Partnerships and Regulatory Assistance Mail Code 8P -AR U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region VIII 1595 Wynkoop Street Denver, CO 80202-1129 Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit Acronyms Appendix E Page 87 APPENDIX E Permit Acronyms Listed Alphabetically: AIRS - Aerometric Information Retrieval System AP -42 - EPA Document Compiling Air Pollutant Emission Factors APEN - Air Pollution Emission Notice (State of Colorado) APCD - Air Pollution Control Division (State of Colorado) ASTM - American Society for Testing and Materials BACT - Best Available Control Technology BTU - British Thermal Unit CAA - Clean Air Act (CAAA = Clean Air Act Amendments) CCR - Colorado Code of Regulations CEM - Continuous Emissions Monitor CF - Cubic Feet (SCF = Standard Cubic Feet) CFR - Code of Federal Regulations CO - Carbon Monoxide COM - Continuous Opacity Monitor CRS - Colorado Revised Statute EF - Emission Factor EPA - Environmental Protection Agency FI - Fuel input Rate in MMBtu/hr FR - Federal Register G - Grams Gal - Gallon GPM - Gallons per Minute HAPs - Hazardous Air Pollutants HP - Horsepower HP -HR - Horsepower Hour (G/HP-HR = Grams per Horsepower Hour) LAER - Lowest Achievable Emission Rate LBS - Pounds M - Thousand MM - Million MMscf - Million Standard Cubic Feet MMscfd - Million Standard Cubic Feet per Day N/A or NA Not Applicable NOx - Nitrogen Oxides NEST-IAP - National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants NSPS - New Source Performance Standards P - Process Weight Rate in Tons/Hr PE - Particulate Emissions PM - Particulate Matter PMZ_5 - Particulate Matter Under 2.5 Microns Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Permit Acronyms Appendix E Page 88 PM10 - Particulate Matter Under 10 Microns PSD - Prevention of Significant Deterioration PTE - Potential To Emit RACT - Reasonably Available Control Technology SCC - Source Classification Code SCF - Standard Cubic Feet SIC - Standard Industrial Classification SO2 - Sulfur Dioxide TPY - Tons Per Year TSP - Total Suspended Particulate VOC - Volatile Organic Compounds Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Compliance Assurance Monitoring Plan Appendix F Page 89 APPENDIX F Permit Modifications DATE OF REVISION TYPE OF REVISION SECTION NUMBER, CONDITION NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF REVISION Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Operating Permit Compliance Assurance Monitoring Plan Appendix G Page 90 Appendix G Volumetric Flow Rate Equations The following equations shall be used to calculate the volumetric flow rate in regard to the Continuous Emission Rate Monitoring System requirements in Conditions 1.12 and 1.13. Total Stack (wscfm) = (Process Flow + Fuel Flow) x BAF Flow ( fta Process/wscf\ /lbs\ 385.3 [b moil / 100 % ) 1 1 Flow mini FPR hri x ll — io Culler)x (0.15) x 44 lb CO2 1 x \CO2(%vw)) x k,60 01±7_1))lb—moll lfir1 Where: FPR = Furnace Pull Rate; production speed from plant control room computer % Cullet = Percentage of cullet being added to furnace 0.15 = Glass "fusion loss factor" (i.e. 85% of the CO2 is entrained in the produced glass) 358.3 ft3/lb-mol = molar volume of ideal gas at standard conditions 44 lb/lb-mot= molecular weight of CO2 CO2 (%vw) = measured CO2 concentration in the flue gas wscfd.scf mscf i zBtu 100 l 1 Fuel Flow (min) — 1,040 (MMBtu) x 1( hr ) x 1.025 ('scf / x \CO,(°/,ve�)J x r /min \"" l hr 1/ Where: Fe = CO2-based fuel F -factor for natural gas combustion from EPA Method 19 1 mscf/hr = Assumed furnace fuel use 1.025 mBtu/scf = Assumed heat content of natural gas CO2 (%vw) = Measured CO2 concentration in the flue gas BAF = Bias adjustment factor determined during the initial RATA performed on each CERMS (Furnace A = 0.95 and Furnace B = 0.975). Current BAF = 1.00 for both furnaces. Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Issued: DATE TECHNICAL REVIEW DOCUMENT For DRAFT OPERATING PERMIT 06OPWE289 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc Weld County Source ID 123/4406 June 2015 -April 2016 Operating Permit Engineer: Operating Permit Supervisor review: Compliance Unit review: I. Purpose Danielle Walker Matt Burgett Dave Huber This document establishes the basis for decisions made regarding the applicable requirements, emission factors, monitoring plan and compliance status of emission units covered by the Operating Permit for Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. This document is designed for reference during the review of the proposed permit by the EPA, the public, and other interested parties. The conclusions made in this report are based on information provided in the original application submitted on August 11, 2006, additional information submitted on January 9, 2014 and August 20, 2015, comments on the draft permit submitted on June 15, 2016 and August 8, 2016, previous inspection reports and various email correspondence, as well as telephone conversations with the applicant. Please note that copies of the Technical Review Document for the original permit and any Technical Review Documents associated with subsequent modifications of the original Operating Permit may be found in the Division files as well as on the Division website at www.colorado.gov/cdphe/airTitleV. This narrative is intended only as an adjunct for the reviewer and has no legal standing. Any revisions made to the underlying construction permits associated with this facility made in conjunction with the processing of this operating permit application have been reviewed in accordance with the requirements of Regulation No. 3, Part B, Construction Permits, and have been found to meet all applicable substantive and procedural requirements. This operating permit incorporates and shall be considered to be a combined construction/operating permit for any such revision, and the permittee shall be allowed to operate under the revised conditions upon issuance of this operating permit without applying for a revision to this permit or for an additional or revised construction permit. II. Description of Source Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc, is a glass container manufacturing company as defined under Standard Industrial Classification 3221. This facility produces glass containers for various food and beverage industries from raw materials of silica sand, soda ash, limestone, and from recycled glass called cullet. Production of container 123/4406 Page 1 of 50 Owens -Brockway Glass Container, Inc. Operating Permit No. 06OPWE289 Technical Review Document —Initial Operating Permit glass begins with weighing, combining, and mixing the raw materials together. The mixed raw materials are sent to the glass melting furnaces where the raw materials are melted together. The melted glass travels from the furnaces to the refiners where the molten glass is heat conditioned. The conditioned molten glass travels to the glass forming station where the glass is cut in to gobs (sections) and shaped/moulded into containers through pressing and blowing. Once moulded, the glass goes to the hot end surface treatment (HEST) process. The containers are then cooled and sent to annealing where the unwanted stress areas are removed. The glass then goes through inspection and testing where the finished product is either shipped/stored or the undesirable glass is recycled to be crushed and used as cullet. This facility's permitted emission points consist of two (2) custom built glass melting furnaces, two (2) refiners, four (4) annealing lehrs, four (4) forming machines, four (4) hot end surface treatment (HEST) systems, three (3) backup diesel fired compression ignition generators, three (3) carton printing systems, three (3) hot glue systems, four (4) cold end spray systems, two (2) cooling towers, three (3) batch house dust batch . . .. coueczors, thirty-three (33) house dust coiiectors vented rnrernauy, one (I) automatic blank lubrication system, and fugitive emissions from the cullet storage piles, rail car unloading, truck unloading, and haul roads. This facility is located at 11133 Eastman Park Drive, Windsor, CO 80631 and consists of approximately 100 acres. This facility is located in an Area classified as attainment for all pollutants except ozone. It is classified as non -attainment for the 8 -hr Ozone Control Area as defined in Regulation No. 7, Section II.A.1. Wyoming is an affected state within 50 miles (mi) of the facility. Rocky Mountain National Park is a Federal Class I designated area within 100 kilometers (km) of the facility. Non -Attainment New Source Review (NANSR) and Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) This facility is categorized as a NANSR major stationary source (Potential to Emit of NOx > 100 Tons/Year). Future modifications at this facility resulting in a significant net emissions increase (see Colorado Regulation No. 3, Part D, Sections II.A.27 and 44) for NOx or a modification which is major by itself (i.e. a Potential to Emit of > 100 TPY of NOx) may result in the application of the NANSR review requirements. Based on the information provided by the applicant, this source is categorized as a minor stationary source for PSD as of the issuance date of this permit. Any future modification which is major by itself (Potential to Emit of NOx ≥ 250 TPY) for any pollutant listed in Colorado Regulation No. 3, Part D, Section II.A.44 for which the area is in attainment or attainment/maintenance may result in the application of the PSD review requirements. Emissions (in tons/yr) at the facility are as follows: Potential to Emit, PTE (tons per year) NO, VOC CO PM PMio PM2.5 SO2 Source Furnace A Furnace B Two (2) Refiners Four (4) Annealing Lehrs 97.3 15.7 15.7 35.3 35.3 35.3 62.8 97.3 15.7 15.7 35.3 35.3 35.3 62.8 4.6 3.9 14.0 11.8 123/4406 Page 2 of 50 Owens -Brockway Glass Container, Inc. Operating Permit No. 06OPWE289 Technical Review Document — Initial Operating Permit Five (5) Forming Machines Four (4) HEST's Diesel Backup Generator A Diesel Backup Generator B Packing Operations Mould Shop Two (2) Cooling Towers Three (3) Dust Collectors Thirty -Three (33) Dust Collectors Fugitive Dust Source Warehouse Generator Automatic Blank Lubrication System Total 221.9 70.7 47.1 187.0 133.3 126.4 131.2 3.7 3.7 1.3 2.0 24.5 12.8 24.3 5.6 30.4 2.25 12.5 4.0 2.0 38.3 2.6 30.4 2.25 12.5 4.0 2.0 8.9 30.4 2.25 12.5 4.0 2.0 2.0 2.6 2.6 2011 Actual Emissions 231.87 74.24 56.87 205.44 126.41 98.66 132.26 The Potential to Emit (PTE) is based on the Operating Permit, Construction Permit No.12WE1354 and No. 03WE1151, and information provided by the applicant. Actual Emissions are from the Division's Inventory system for the year 2011. The 2011 actual emissions for NOx, VOC, CO, PM, and SO2 being greater than the total permit limit is likely due to a modification at the facility. Accidental Release Program — 112(r) Section 112(r) of the Clean Air Act mandates a new federal focus on the prevention of chemical accidents. Sources subject to these provisions must develop and implement risk management programs that include hazard assessment, a prevention program, and an emergency response program. They must prepare and implement a Risk Management Plan (RMP) as specified in the Rule Based on the information provided by the applicant, this facility is not subject to the provisions of the Accidental Release Prevention Program (Section 112(r) of the Federal Clean Air Act). Compliance Assurance Monitoring (CAM) The following emission points at this facility use a control device to achieve compliance with an emission limitation or standard to which they are subject and have pre -control emissions that exceed or are equivalent to the major source threshold. The following emission points are therefore subject to the provisions of the CAM program as set forth in 40 CFR Part 64 as adopted by reference into Colorado Regulation No. 3, Part C, Section XIV: Point 001 and 002 — Glass Melting Furnaces for PM and SO2 Points 001 and 002 both have pre -control emissions of particulate matter and sulfur dioxide that exceed major source thresholds. The initial operating permit application was submitted after April 20, 1998. 40 CFR Part 64, §64.5(b) requires all other pollutant -specific emission units subject to CAM and not subject to §64.5(a), large pollutant -specific emission unit requirements, to submit the information required under §64.4 as part of an application for the Operating Permit renewal. The glass melting furnaces are not defined as large pollutant -specific emission units. 123/4406 Page 3 of 50 Owens -Brockway Glass Container, Inc. Operating Permit No. 06OPWE289 Technical Review Document — Initial Operating Permit Owens -Brockway will need to submit the CAM plan for Point 001 and 002 along with their operating permit renewal application. Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) This facility is a minor source for Hazardous Air Pollutants and is subject to the following provisions of 40 CFR Part 63 — National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Source Categories (MACT) as an area source, Subpart ZZZZ. See the specific emission points 011, 012, and 024 below for further discussion. Emissions of Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) at the facility are as follows: Potential to Emit, PTE Pollutant CAS Number lbs per year tons per year Formaldehyde 50000 Hydrochloric Acid 7647010 Hexane 110543 Chromium Giyuoi Ethers -- Total HAPs 84.1 8;157 2,397 56.9 10,900 21,594.6 10.80 0.04 4.08 1.2 0.03 5.45 2011 Actual Emissions 19,811.8 9.906 Greenhouse Gases The potential -to -emit of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from this facility are less than 100,000 TPY CO2e. Future modifications greater than 100,000 TPY CO2e may be subject to regulation (Regulation No. 3, Part A, I.B.44). Keasonably Achievable Control I eohnology {RAU I ) Kequirements The source is located in an ozone non -attainment or attainment -maintenance area and is subject to the Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) requirements of Regulation No. 3, Part B, Section III.D.2 for VOC and NOx. However, Points 001, 002, 003, 006, 008, 009, 011, 012, 015, 018, 019, 020, and 023 commenced operation in 2005 which was during the 8 -hour ozone nonattainment standard deferral period that expired on November 20, 2007. RACT does not apply to those points since they were not considered new or modified after the area was designated nonattainment. Point 024 commenced operation while the area was designated nonattainment for the ozone 8 -hour standard and is subject to the provisions of RACT. 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Dc, Standards of Performance for Small Industrial - Commercial -Institutional Steam Generating Units Subpart Dc applies to each steam generating unit for which construction, modification, or reconstruction is commenced after June 9, 1989 and has a maximum design heat input capacity of 29 megawatts (100 MMBtu per hour) or less, but greater than or equal to 2.9 megawatts (10 MMBtu per hour). Points 003 consists of two refiners each rated at 5.29 MMBtu per hour and Point 006 consists of four annealing lehrs each rated at 8.0 MMBtu per hour, all units are less than 10 MMBtu per hour and are not steam generating units, they are notsubject to the provisions of Subpart Dc. 123/4406 Page 4 of 50 Owens -Brockway Glass Container, Inc. Operating Permit No. 06OPWE289 Technical Review Document— Initial Operating Permit 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart JJJJJJ, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Industrial, Commercial and Institutional Boilers Area Sources Subpart JJJJJJ applies to industrial, commercial, or institutional boilers that are located at an area source of HAPs. Point 003 is a natural gas fired refiner and Point 006 is a natural gas fired annealing lehr, neither are defined as boilers under Subpart JJJJJJ. Subpart JJJJJJ does not apply to gas -fired boilers as per §63.11195(e). A gas -fired boiler burns gaseous fuels and natural gas is considered a gaseous fuel under Subpart JJJJJJ, therefore Point 003 and 006 are not subject to the provisions of Subpart JJJJJJ. III. Emission Sources A. Point 001 and 002 - Two (2) O -I Custom Built Natural Gas Glass Melting Furnaces, Each Rated at 57.35 MMBtu/hr The furnaces at the facility are fed mixed raw materials consisting of sand, salt cake, limestone, soda ash, and cullet through the feeder where the raw materials float on top of the molten glass already in the furnace. These materials melt into a viscous fluid and move towards the front of the furnace where the molten glass flows through a throat that leads to the refiners. The furnaces are oxy-fueled. Oxy-fueled furnaces utilize oxygen with a purity of 90 percent or greater as the fuel oxidant. Each furnace is equipped with a Dry Scrubber to control sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions and an Electrostatic Precipitator (ESP) to control particulate matter (PM) emissions. Please note that the requirements in the operating permit apply to the furnaces combined, unless stated otherwise in the requirement. 1. Applicable Requirements According to the Title V permit application, Point 001 commenced operation in September 2005 and Point 002 commenced operation in August 2005. Point 001 and 002 are each rated at 57.35 MMBtu per hour. Colorado Construction Permit No. 03WE1151 was issued as a facility wide permit including Point 001 and 002 on May 25, 2004 as an initial approval permit. A final approval permit was issued for Colorado Construction Permit No. 03WE1151 on May 1, 2007. The most recent issuance, Issuance 3, was issued on July 17, 2015. The appropriate provisions of Issuance 3 of the construction permit have been directly incorporated into this operating permit. The appropriate applicable requirements from Colorado Construction Permit 03WE1151 for Point 001 and 002 are as follows: • Condition 6: Facility wide emission limitations: NOx - 220.67 tons per year, CO - 47.06 tons per year, SO2 - 131.12 tons per year, VOC - 41.20 tons per year, PM - 115.42 tons per year, PM10 and PM25- 91.06 tons per year. 123/4406 Page 5 of 50 Owens -Brockway Glass Container, Inc. Operating Permit No. 06OPWE289 Technical Review Document —Initial Operating Permit The emission limitations for each pollutant have been included in the permit as individual emission point limitations: NOx — 194.6 tons per year, CO — 31.4 tons per year, SO2— 125.6 tons per year, VOC — 31.4 tons per year, PM, PM10 and PM2.5 — 70.6 tons per year. These limitations are part of the facility wide emission limitations from the Construction Permit. Compliance shall be determined on a rolling twelve month total. Please note the PM, PM10, and PM2,5 limits include condensable and non - condensable emissions. • Condition 7: A Dry Scrubber and Electrostatic Precipitator (ESP) shall be maintained and operated to ensure satisfactory performance. Point 001 and 002 were defined with a Dry Scrubber and an ESP in the operating permit application. • Condition 8: The production of glass (pull rate) shall not exceed 313,900 tons per year. Compliance with the glass production rate will be monitored by multiplying the bottles produced per hour by the weight of the bottles by the hours of operation, as provided in the operating permit application. Compliance shall be monitored on a rolling twelve month total. Currently Owens Brockway only produces one size of bottle and the weight ranges from 6.85 to 6.95 ounces as per email with the source on 2;12%2016. • Condition 9: Visible emissions shall not exceed twenty percent (20%) opacity during normal operation of the source. During periods of startup, process modification, or adjustment of control equipment visible emissions Lail ....L exceed thirty p.........• (30%) opacity for .....ore than six minutes shall not exceed thirty percent ��u ion opaCi�y for more uian am inuiu ica in any sixty consecutive minutes. Opacity shall be determined using EPA Method 9. The furnaces are subject to the Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section II.A.1 and II.A.4 opacity requirements. The 20% opacity requirement in II.A.1 applies at all times, except in certain operating conditions when the 30% opacity requirement in II.A.4 applies. The 20% opacity requirement is required to be monitored quarterly using EPA Reference Method 9. The 30% opacity requirement is only required annually while the specific operating conditions of Section II.A.4 are occurring. If the specific operating conditions of Section II.A.4 do not occur during that calendar year, then no opacity test is required for the 30% opacity requirement of Section II.A.4 that calendar year. • Condition 12: Emissions from the glass melting furnaces combined shall not exceed the following limitations: Non -Condensable PM, PM10, PM2.5 — 31.4 tons per year. Compliance shall be determined by EPA Reference Method 5. This condition was not included in the operating permit. It has been streamlined out of the permit because the particulate matter (PM, PM1o, 123/4406 Page 6 of 50 Owens -Brockway Glass Container, Inc. Operating Permit No. 06OPWE289 Technical Review Document — Initial Operating Permit PM2.5) emission limitations in the operating permit combined for both furnaces of 70.6 tons per year includes condensable and non - condensable (filterable) particulate matter. • Condition 14: The glass furnaces are subject to the New Source Performance Standards requirements of Regulation No. 6, Part A, Subpart CC, Standards of Performance for Glass Manufacturing Plants. The revised final rule for Standards of Performance for Glass Manufacturing Plants was published in the federal register on October 17, 2000. The two glass melting furnaces at Owens -Brockway are subject to the 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart CC requirements. 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart CC covers each glass melting furnace that has commenced construction or modification after June 15, 1979. The two furnaces at this facility commenced construction in 2005. The furnaces at this facility are fired by gaseous fuel and produce container glass. Container glass is defined as "glass made of soda -lime recipe, clear or colored, which is pressed and/or blown into bottles, jars, ampoules, and other products listed in Standard Industrial Classification 3221." While the glass melting furnaces are a modified process, the furnaces operate with the use of add-on pollution controls. Therefore, the furnaces are subject to the standards of particulate matter under §60.292. Owens Brockway will not have to comply with §60.293, standards for particulate matter from glass melting furnace with modified -processes. The standards of particulate matter under §60.292 have a particulate matter emission rate limit of 0.1 gram of particulate per kg of glass produced (0.2 pounds of particulate per ton of glass produced). • Condition 15: The glass melting furnaces shall be equipped with continuous emission monitors for: NOx The continuous emission monitoring systems shall be installed, operated, calibrated, and maintained to accurately measure and record emissions. Results from these monitoring systems will be used to demonstrate compliance with the emission limits and standards specified in the permit. Owens -Brockway installed a Continuous Emission Rate Monitoring System (CERMS) to monitor their NOx, SO2, and CO2 emissions to demonstrate that the facility is a minor source for PSD. The facility is following the QA/QC requirements for CEMS of 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix B and Appendix F as applicable. The CERMS extractive probes are located on the A and B furnace stacks; they are accessible by catwalks. The CEMS system's analyzers are located in the Furnace Control Room, approximately 90 feet from the stacks. There is one instrument rack that incorporates both the A and B stack analyzers. 123/4406 Page 7 of 50 Owens -Brockway Glass Container, Inc. Operating Permit No. 06OPWE289 Technical Review Document — Initial Operating Permit The GERMS measures and records the following: Hourly emission rates of NOx and SO2 in pounds per ton of glass pulled. Hourly concentration of NOx and SO2 in ppmv. • Emissions of NOx and SO2 in lbs per hour, tons per month, and tons per twelve month periods. Volumetric flow rate in standard cubic feet per hour. Owens Brockway calculates the volumetric flow rate as specified in Appendix G of the operating permit. The Division approved the predictive calculation in 2005. in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Manuel submitted to the Division, Owens Brockway states the volumetric flow rate for __. IL.._t:__ __ _ L_ determined using II_... .00hs.._ __ 1.V111u UJUVII IJI VI.CJJCJ l.Gll be UCICIIIIIIICU using IIVVY IIIVIIILVIJ or engineering calculations and it was determined by the EPA that engineering calculations can give equivalent flow data. Owens Brockway uses the engineering calculations in Appendix G and shown below to determine mass emission rates from the facility. t3 Process Ihs, 385.3 �ra=f •lnn i FPR x 1—% Collet x (0.15) x x x Flow min FPR ) 14 / thCO2 ) (CO2(°.6[40 !Ku nun) V�V I IICI C. FPR - rurllde r Urun flak, IJIUUUUIIUII JlaeeU II ul I I plwlll control room computer Cullet = Percentage of cullet being added to furnace 0.15 = Glass "fusion loss factor" (i.e. 85% of the CO2 is entrained in the produced glass) 358.3 ft'/lb-mol = molar volume of ideal gas at standard conditions 44 lb/lb-mot= molecular weight of CO2 CO2 (%vw) = measured CO2 concentration in the flue gas wscf scf mscf n1BtR 100 1 Fuel Flow ( min — 1,040 (mmia Ic) x 1( hr ) x 1.025 ( set ) x (COz(' uw. x mul sa Where: Fc = CO2-based fuel F -factor for natural gas combustion from EPA Method 19 1 mscf/hr = Assumed furnace fuel use 1.025 mBtu/scf = Assumed heat content of natural gas CO2 (%vw) = Measured CO2 concentration in the flue gas BAF = Bias adjustment factor determined during the initial RATA performed on each GERMS (Furnace A = 0.95 and Furnace B = 0.975). Current BAF = 1.00 for both furnaces. Natural gas flow rate in standard cubic feet per hour. 123/4406 Page 8 of 50 Owens -Brockway Glass Container, Inc. Operating Permit No. 060PWE289 Technical Review Document —Initial Operating Permit • The operating mode (startup, shutdown, or standard operation). Hourly concentration of CO2 in percent volume. Quarterly submittals are required for the Excess Emission Reports (EER). An annual Relative Accuracy Test Audit (RATA) is conducted for NOx, SO2, CO2, and flow under the provisions of the applicable Performance Specifications of 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix B. • Condition 18 and 19: This source is subject to the process weight rate of Regulation No. 6, Part B, Section III.C. Colorado Regulation No. 6, Part B, Section III.C has been streamlined from the permit and replaced by the Particulate Matter Standards from Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section III.C. See discussion of streamlining under the Streamlined Conditions, Section IV of this document, and discussion of the Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section III.C applicability and requirements below in this section. In addition to the Construction Permit Conditions, the following applicable requirements have been incorporated into the Operating Permit: • The number of glass bottles produced each hour shall be monitored and recorded on a daily basis to aid in the total glass production calculation as requested in the operating permit application. The operating permit application requested monitoring the number of bottles produced per minute, this has been changed to monitoring the number of bottles produced per hour and keeping records of the number of bottles produced daily to aid in calculation. • The hours of operation for the furnaces shall be monitored and recorded on a daily basis to aid in the total glass production calculation as requested in the operating permit application. The operating permit application requested monitoring the minutes of operation; this has been changed to hours of operation to aid in emission calculation. • The weight of the bottle produced by the facility shall be recorded on a monthly basis to aid in the total glass production calculation as requested in the operating permit application. Currently the facility only produces one size bottle that weighs 6.85-6.95 ounces. • A PM stack test shall be conducted once every five years to verify compliance with the particulate emission limit/standards. The stack test shall be conducted in accordance with the APCD Compliance Test Manual. The first stack test shall be conducted within 180 days of this permit issuance. Each stack test shall be conducted to monitor the emissions of each ESP operating mode of all three fields operating, two of the three fields operating, and one field operating. The test shall test for condensable and non -condensable (filterable) particulate matter. 123/4406 Page 9 of 50 Owens -Brockway Glass Container, Inc. Operating Permit No. 06OPWE289 Technical Review Document — Initial Operating Permit • Continuous monitoring of the dry scrubbers and electrostatic precipitators on the furnaces and daily inspections of the electrostatic precipitators to ensure proper operation has been included from the facilities most recent Operation and Maintenance (O&M) plan submitted on March 11, 2015. • Colorado Regulation No.1, Section III.C, Emission Control Regulations for Particulate Matter for Manufacturing Processes. Regulation No. 1, Section III.C applies to all manufacturing processes. A manufacturing process is defined as "An action, operation, or treatment involving chemical, industrial, or manufacturing factors, such as heat treating furnaces, or fuel -burning devices that are a part of a manufacturing process where emissions are intermixed with the process emissions, heating and reheating furnaces, sintering trains, electric furnaces, kilns, dryers, roasters, painting ovens, direct fired drying ovens, crushers, and all other methods and forms of manufacturing or processing that emit,or affect the emission issionn of air pollutants, but not including fuel - burning equipment" (Colorado Common Provisions Regulation). Point 001 and 002 are classified as manufacturing processes each with process weight rates less than than 30 tons per hour. They are subject to the requirements of Section III.C.1.b. The allowable particulate emissions in lbs per hour (21.48 lbs per hour each) was determined from the process weight rate of total glass production (35.83 tons of glass produced per hour for both furnaces, 17.92 tons of glass produced per hour for each furnace). Note that each furnace is exhausted to the atmosphere from its own stack. Compliance with the particulate matter standards of Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section III.C shall be monitored by using the emission rates from the most recent PM stack test and keeping a record of the compliance on site. • The furnaces are subject to the Sulfur Dioxide Emission Regulations of Colorado Regulation No. 6, Part B, Section III.D. Colorado Regulation No. 6, Part B, Section III.D has been streamlined from the permit and replaced by the Sulfur Dioxide Standards from Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section VI.B. See discussion of streamlining under the Streamlined Conditions, Section IV of this document, and discussion of the Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section VI.B applicability and requirements below in this section. • The furnaces are subject to the Colorado Regulation No. 1, Emission Control Regulations for Sulfur Oxides for the State of Colorado, Sulfur Dioxide Emission Regulations, Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section VI.B. Regulation No. 1, Section VI.B applies to all new sources of sulfur dioxide emissions. A new source of sulfur dioxide is defined as a source that has 123/4406 Page 10 of 50 Owens -Brockway Glass Container, Inc. Operating Permit No. 06OPWE289 Technical Review Document — Initial Operating Permit not been issued an Emission Permit prior to August 11, 1977. Point 001 and 002 are considered new sources. Section VI.B does not have specific sulfur dioxide regulations for glass melting furnaces, the furnaces are subject to the requirements of Section VI.B.5 for any new source of sulfur dioxide not specifically regulated. Section VI.B.5 limits emissions to no more than two (2) tons per day of sulfur dioxide or for sources to utilize the best available control technology as determined by the Division and subject to review by the commission. Compliance with this regulation shall be determined by keeping a record of calculation demonstrating compliance with the emission limitation on site. • The furnaces are exempt from the Continuous Emission Monitoring Requirements for New or Existing Sources in Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section IV because they are not required to install, calibrate, certify and maintain GEMS for opacity, and/or sulfur dioxide, and/or carbon monoxide. The glass melting furnaces do not fall under any of the source categories under Section IV of fossil fuel -fired steam generators, sulfuric acid plant, or fluid bed catalytic cracking unit at petroleum refineries. • The furnaces are exempt from the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart SSSSSS, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Glass Manufacturing Area Sources. Subpart SSSSSS applies to glass manufacturing facilities that are an area source of Hazardous Air Pollutants. Subpart SSSSSS is applicable to glass manufacturing facilities that use one or more continuous furnaces to produce glass that contains compounds of one or more glass manufacturing metal HAPs as raw materials in a glass manufacturing batch formulation. Glass manufacturing metal HAPs are defined as " an oxide or other compound of any of the following metals included in the list of urban HAP for the Integrated Urban Air Toxics Strategy and for which Glass Manufacturing was listed as an area source category: arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr), lead (Pb), manganese (Mn), and nickel (Ni)." This facility does not use any of the glass manufacturing metal HAPs in their batch formulation, the furnaces are not subject to this subpart. If the facility were to use any glass manufacturing metal HAP as a raw material in the future, it would be subject to 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart SSSSSS. 2. Emission Factors Emissions from the furnaces are produced primarily from combustion and off - gassing from the melting of raw materials. Emission factors used to calculate emission limits for the criteria air pollutants are provided in the table below. Emission Factors (Ibs/ton) Uncontrolled Controlled Pollutant Source PM 2.25 0.45 Source Provided 123/4406 Page 11 of 50 Owens -Brockway Glass Container, Inc. Operating Permit No. 06OPWE289 Technical Review Document —Initial Operating Permit Who PM25 SO2 NOx CO VOC 0.45 0.45 Source Provided 0.45 0.45 Source Provided 3.2 0.8 Source Provided 1.24 1.24 Source Provided 0.2 0.2 AP -42, Chapter 11.15, Table11.15-2 0.2 0.2 AP -42, Chapter 11.15, Table11.15-2 The Electrostatic Precipitator (ESP) controls PM emissions by 80%; the controlled emission factor has been included in the operating permit. The Dry Scrubber controls the SO2 emissions by 75%; the controlled emission factor has been included in the operating permit. Please note that Sulfuric Acid is non - criteria reportable pollutant for these points and Hexane is a reportable Hazardous Air Pollutant for these points. 3. Monitoring Plan To monitor compliance with all applicable requirements, emissions will be calculated on a monthly basis, the glass production will be calculated daily, and the bottles produced per hour and hours of operation will be monitored on a daily basis. There will be a particulate stack test required after issuance of the operating permit and one every five years proceeding. A calculation of compliance with the allowable particulate emissions from Colorado Regulation No. 1 will need to be kept on site. Quarterly opacity observations are required for the 20% opacity requirement and an annual opacity observation is required for the 30% opacity requirement. The Continuous Emission Monitoring System shall monitor NOx emissions for the furnaces to determine compliance with the annual emission limitation. The CFM.S shall meet the equipment, instillation, and performance specifications of 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix B, and follow the quality assurance/quality control requirements of 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix F and Subpart A, §60.13. The monitoring program is subject to annual Relative Accuracy Test Audits (RATA) to validate that the monitors are functioning properly and quarterly Excess Emission Reports (EER). The source will also conduct daily calibration drift assessments. 4. Compliance Status The Title V permit application indicates that Points 001 and 002 are in compliance with all applicable requirements. The Division conducted a full compliance inspection on the facility on January 12, 2015. According to the inspection, Points 001 was out of compliance with its requirements. Point 001's Electrostatic Precipitator (ESP) was not operating with the required two (2) of the three (3) fields on the ESP from December 28, 2014 through January 19, 2015 as the approved Operating and Maintenance (O&M) Plan at that time required. On June 2, 2015 the Division approved the revised O&M Plan submitted by Owens -Brockway Glass on March 11, 2015 to allow the ESPs to operate with only one (1) of the three (3) fields in operation as long as the facility followed steps to minimize the duration of this occurrence. 123/4406 Page 12 of 50 Owens -Brockway Glass Container, Inc. Operating Permit No. 06OPWE289 Technical Review Document — Initial Operating Permit B. Point 003 - Two (2) O -I Custom Built Refiners, Rated at 10.58 MMBtu/hr Combined Each furnace is equipped with a natural gas fired refiner. The refiners prepare the molten glass with heat conditioning before the molten glass enters the forming process. 1. Applicable Requirements According to the Title V permit application, Point 003 commenced operation in August 2005. Colorado Construction Permit No. 03WE1151 was issued as a facility wide permit including Point 003 on May 25, 2004 as an initial approval permit. A final approval permit was issued for Colorado Construction Permit No. 03WE1151 on May 1, 2007. The most recent issuance, Issuance 3, was issued on July 17, 2015. Please note that the requirements apply to the two (2) refiners combined unless stated otherwise. The appropriate applicable requirements from Colorado Construction Permit 03WE1151 for Point 003 are as follows: • Condition 9: Opacity — Visible emissions shall not exceed 20% during normal operation of the source. During periods of startup, process modification, or adjustment of control equipment visible emissions shall not exceed 30% opacity for more than six minutes in any sixty consecutive minutes. Opacity shall be determined using EPA Method 9. Compliance with the opacity standards can be presumed since only natural gas is permitted to be used as fuel in the refiners. • Condition 6: Facility wide emission limitations: NOx - 220.67 tons per year, CO - 47.06 tons per year. The emission limitations for each pollutant have been included in the permit as individual emission point limitations: NOx — 4.63 tons per year, CO — 3.89 tons per year. These limitations are part of the facility wide emission limitations from the Construction Permit. Compliance shall be determined on a rolling twelve month total. • Condition 8: Consumption of natural gas for Point 003 shall not exceed 92.68 MMscf per year. The consumption of natural gas for both refiners combined has been limited to 92.68 MMscf per year compliance shall be determined on a rolling twelve month total. The source has a fuel meter on each refiner, where they then combine the natural consumption from each refiner to report combined natural gas consumption for both refiners. • Condition 18 and 19: This source is subject to the process weight rate of Regulation No. 6, Part B, Section III.C. 123/4406 Page 13 of 50 Owens -Brockway Glass Container, Inc. Operating Permit No. 06OPWE289 Technical Review Document — Initial Operating Permit Colorado Regulation No. 6, Part B, Section III.C has been streamlined from the permit and replaced by the Particulate Matter Standards from Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section III.C. See discussion of streamlining under the Streamlined Conditions, Section IV of this document, and discussion of the Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section III.C applicability below in this Section III.B.1. In addition to the Construction Permit Conditions, the following applicable requirements have been incorporated into the Operating Permit: • Colorado Regulation No.1, Section III.C, Emission Control Regulations for Particulate Matter for Manufacturing Processes. Point 003 is defined as a manufacturing process (see definition of manufacturing process in Section lII.B.1 of this document) with a process weight rate greater than 30 tons per hour. It is subject to the requirements of Section III.C.1.b, the allowable particulate emissions in lbs per hour (30.69 lbs per hour) was determined from the process weight rate of total glass production (35.83 tons of glass produced per hour). Compliance with this requirement can be presumed since only natural gas is permitted to be used as fuel in the refiners. 2. Emission Factors Emissions from the refiners are produced during the combustion process, consisting of mainly NOx and CO. The emission factors for all criteria pollutants are listed in the table below. The emission factors have been converted from ibs per MMscf to lbs per MMBtu in the operating permit. Pollutant Emission Factors Source Ib/MMBtu lb/MMscf NOx SOX VOC CO PM PM10 PM25 0.1000 100 AP -42, Chapter 1.4, Table 1.4-1 0.0006 0.6 AP -42, Chapter 1.4, Table 1.4-2 0.0055 5.5 AP -42, Chapter 1.4, Table 1.4-2 0.0840 84 AP -42, Chapter 1.4, Table 1.4-1 0.0076 7.6 AP -42, Chapter 1.4, Table 1.4-2 0.0076 7.6 AP -42, Chapter 1.4, Table 1.4-2 0.0076 7.6 AP -42, Chapter 1.4, Table 1.4-2 The emission factors and emissions are based on the natural gas heating value of 1000 Btu/scf. There are no reportable Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) for this point. Please note that only NOx and CO emissions are greater than APEN reporting thresholds so they are the only limitations included in the Operating Permit (Colorado Regulation No. 3, Part A, Section II.B.3.a). 3. Monitoring Plan To determine compliance with all requirements, the NOx and CO emissions, natural gas consumption, and hours of operation shall be monitored and recorded monthly. 123/4406 Page 14 of 50 Owens -Brockway Glass Container, Inc. Operating Permit No. 06OPWE289 Technical Review Document — Initial Operating Permit 4. Compliance Status The Title V permit application indicates that Point 003 is in compliance with all applicable requirements. The Division conducted a full compliance inspection on the facility on January 12, 2015. According to the inspection, Point 003 was in compliance with all applicable requirements. C. Point 006 — Four (4) Bowman Annealing Lehrs, Rated at 32.0 MMBtu/hr Combined Once the glass has been shaped in to containers, it enters the annealing lehrs where it is cooled and tempered. Annealing lehrs are natural gas fired kilns, there are three per furnace. 1. Applicable Requirements According to the Title V permit application, Point 006 commenced operation in August 2005. Colorado Construction Permit No. 03WE1151 was issued as a facility wide permit including Point 006 on May 25, 2004 as an initial approval permit. A final approval permit was issued for Colorado Construction Permit No. 03WE1151 on May 1, 2007. Issuance 3 was issued on July 17, 2015. Please note that the requirements apply to the four (4) annealing lehrs combined unless stated otherwise. The appropriate applicable requirements from Colorado Construction Permit 03WE1151 for Point 006 are as follows: • Condition 9: Opacity — Visible emissions shall not exceed 20% during normal operation of the source. During periods of startup, process modification, or adjustment of control equipment visible emissions shall not exceed 30% opacity for more than six minutes in any sixty consecutive minutes. Opacity shall be determined using EPA Method 9. Compliance with the opacity standards can be presumed since only natural gas is permitted to be used as fuel in these units. • Condition 6: Facility wide emission limitations: NOx - 220.67 tons per year, CO - 47.06 tons per year. The emission limitations for each pollutant have been included in the permit as individual emission point limitations: NOx - 14.02 tons per year, CO — 11.77 tons per year. These limitations are part of the facility wide emission limitations from the Construction Permit. Compliance shall be determined on a rolling twelve month total. • Condition 8: Consumption of natural gas for Point 006 shall not exceed 280.0 MMscf per year. The consumption of natural gas for all four annealing lehrs combined has been limited to 280.4 MMscf per year. Compliance with the consumption 123/4406 Page 15 of 50 Owens -Brockway Glass Container, Inc. Operating Permit No. 06OPWE289 Technical Review Document — Initial Operating Permit limit will be monitored on a rolling twelve month total. The source has a fuel meter on each annealing lehr, where they then combine the natural gas consumption from each annealing lehr to report combined natural gas consumption for all four annealing lehrs. • Condition 18 and 19: This source is subject to the process weight rate of Regulation No. 6, Part B, Section III.C. Colorado Regulation No. 6, Part B, Section III.C has been streamlined from the permit and replaced by the Particulate Matter Standards from Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section III.C. See discussion of streamlining under the Streamlined Conditions, Section IV of this document, and discussion of the Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section III.C applicability below in this Section III.C.1. In addition to the Construction Permit Conditions, the following applicable requirements have been incorporated into the Operating Permit: • Colorado Regulation No.1, Section III.C, Emission Control Regulations for Particulate Matter for Manufacturing Processes. Point 006 is defined as a manufacturing process (see definition of manufacturing process in Section 111.13.1 of this document) with a process weight rate greater than 30 tons per hour. It is subject to the requirements of Section III.C.1.b, the allowable particulate emissions in lbs per hour (30.69 Ms per Hour) was determined from the process weight rate of totai glass production (35.83 tons of glass produced per hour). Compliance with this requirement can be presumed since only natural gas is permitted to be used as fuel in these units. 2. Emission Factors Emissions from the annealing lehrs are produced during the combustion process. They consist of mainly NOx and CO. The emission factors for all criteria pollutants and the reportable Hazardous Air Pollutants are listed in the table below. The emission factors have been converted from lbs per MMscf to lbs per MMBtu in the operating permit. Pollutant Emission Factor Source lb/MMBtu lb/MMscf NOx SOX VOC CO PM PM,0 PM25 Hexane 0.1000 100 AP -42, Chapter 1.4, Table 1.4-1 0.0006 0.6 AP -42, Chapter 1.4, Table 1.4-2 0.0055 5.5 AP -42, Chapter 1.4, Table 1.4-2 0.0840 84 AP -42, Chapter 1.4, Table 1.4-1 0.0076 7.6 AP -42, Chapter 1.4, Table 1.4-2 0.0076 7.6 AP -42, Chapter 1.4, Table 1.4-2 0.0076 7.6 AP -42, Chapter 1.4, Table 1.4-2 0.0018 1.8 AP -42, Chapter 1.4, Table 1.4-3 123/4406 Page 16 of 50 Ij Owens -Brockway Glass Container, Inc. Operating Permit No. 06OPWE289 Technical Review Document — Initial Operating Permit The emission factors and emissions are based on the natural gas heating value of 1000 Btu/scf. Hexane is a reportable Hazardous Air Pollutant (HAP) for this point. Please note that only NOx and CO emissions are greater than APEN reporting thresholds so they are the only limitations included in the Operating Permit (Colorado Regulation No. 3, Part A, Section ll.B.3.a). 3. Monitoring Plan To determine compliance with all requirements, the NOx and CO emissions, natural gas consumption, and hours of operation shall be monitored and recorded monthly. 4. Compliance Status The Title V permit application indicates that Point 006 is in compliance with all applicable requirements. The Division conducted a full compliance inspection on the facility on January 12, 2015. According to the inspection, Point 006 was in compliance with all applicable requirements. D. Point 008 — Four (4) O -I Custom Built Forming Machines The four (4) forming machines at the facility shape the molten glass that has been cut in to gobs into containers using moulds. The moulds must be continuously maintained, part of this process includes swabbing the moulds with mould lubricating oil. 1. Applicable Requirements According to the Title V permit application, Point 008 commenced operation in August 2005. Colorado Construction Permit No. 03WE1151 was issued as a facility wide permit including Point 008 on May 25, 2004 as an initial approval permit. A final approval permit was issued for Colorado Construction Permit No. 03WE1151 on May 1, 2007. The most recent issuance, Issuance 3, was issued on July 17, 2015. Please note that the requirements apply to all four (4) forming machines combined unless stated otherwise. The appropriate applicable requirements from Colorado Construction Permit 03WE1151 for Point 008 are as follows: • Condition 9: Opacity — Visible emissions shall not exceed 20% during normal operation of the source. During periods of startup, process modification, or adjustment of control equipment visible emissions shall not exceed 30% opacity for more than six minutes in any sixty consecutive minutes. Opacity shall be determined using EPA Method 9. Compliance with the opacity requirement is determined by conducting annual EPA Reference Method 9 observations by a certified Method 9 reader. 123/4406 Page 17 of 50 Owens -Brockway Glass Container, Inc. Operating Permit No. 06OPWE289 Technical Review Document — Initial Operating Permit • Condition 6: Facility wide emission limitations: PM - 115.42 tons per year, SO2 - 131.12 tons per year, VOC - 41.20 tons per year. The emission limitations for each pollutant have been included in the permit as individual emission point limitations: PM — 24.33 tons per year, SO2 — 5.56 tons per year, VOC — 1.95 tons per year. These limitations are a part of the facility wide emission limitations from the Construction Permit. Compliance shall be determined on a rolling twelve month total. • Condition 8: Consumption of mould lubricant oil at the forming machines shall not exceed 55.6 tons per year. The consumption limit has been included in the permit. Compliance with the consumption limit shall be determined in a twelve month rolling total. • Condition 18 and 19: This source is subject to the process weight rate of Regulation No. 6, Part B, Section III.C. Colorado Regulation No. 6, Part B, Section III.C has been streamlined from the permit and replaced by the Particulate Matter Standards from Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section III.C. See discussion of streamlining under the Streamlined Conditions, Section IV of this document, and discussion of the Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section III.C applicability below in this Section III.D.1. In addition to the Construction Permit Conditions, the following applicable requirements have been incorporated into the Operating Permit: • Colorado Regulation No.1, Section III.C, Emission Control Regulations for Particulate Matter for Manufacturing Processes. Point 008 is a manufacturing process (see definition of manufacturing process in Section III.B.1 of this document) with a process weight rate greater than 30 tons per hour. It is subject to the requirements of Section III.C.1.b, the allowable particulate emissions in lbs per hour (30.69 lbs per hour) was determined from the process weight rate of total glass production (35.83 tons of glass produced per hour). Compliance with this regulation shall be determined by keeping a record of calculation demonstrating compliance with the emission limitation on site. • The forming machines are subject to the Colorado Regulation No. 1, Emission Control Regulations for Sulfur Oxides for the State of Colorado, Sulfur Dioxide Emission Regulations, Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section VI.B. Regulation No. 1, Section VI.B applies to all new sources of sulfur dioxide emissions. A new source of sulfur dioxide is defined as a source that has not been issued an Emission Permit prior to August 11, 1977. Point 008 is considered new sources. 123/4406 Page 18 of 50 Owens -Brockway Glass Container, Inc. Operating Permit No. 06OPWE289 Technical Review Document — Initial Operating Permit Section VI.B does not have specific sulfur dioxide regulations for forming machines, the forming machines are subject to the requirements of Section VI.B.5 for any new source of sulfur dioxide not specifically regulated. Section VI.B.5 limits emissions to no more than two (2) tons per day of sulfur dioxide or for sources to utilize the best available control technology as determined by the Division and subject to review by the commission. Compliance with this regulation shall be determined by keeping a record of calculation demonstrating compliance with the emission limitation on site. 2. Emission Factors Emissions from the forming machines are produced during the application of lubricating oil to the bottle forming moulds. The lubricating oil currently used at the facility is Kleenmold 170, information from the MSDS sheet dated 09/30/2003 was used in the calculation of emission factors and emissions. The emission factors are listed below. Pollutant Emission Factor Source lbs/gal lbs/ton NOx SOX VOC CO PM PMio PM25 0.01 0.833 0.58 0.32 3.645 0.286 0.286 0.0001 0.0354 0.0124 0.0068 0.115 0.0122 0.0122 Source Provided Source Provided Source Provided Source Provided Source Provided Source Provided Source Provided The lbs per gallon emission factors were used in the permit. Emissions will be based on the amount of lubricant used rather than the tons of glass produced. Please note that only PM, SO2, and VOC emissions are greater than APEN reporting thresholds so they are the only limitations included in the Operating Permit (Colorado Regulation No. 3, Part A, Section ll.B.3.a). Since this facility is located in the 8 -hour nonattainment area for Ozone, the APEN reporting threshold for NOx and VOC is 1 ton per year. Emissions of VOC exceed this threshold so it has been included in the operating permit. 3. Monitoring Plan To determine compliance with all requirements, the PM, VOC, and SO2 emissions and mould lubricant oil consumption shall be monitored on a monthly basis. Annual opacity observations shall be conducted. 4. Compliance Status The Title V permit application indicates that Point 008 is in compliance with all applicable requirements. The Division conducted a full compliance inspection on the facility on January 12, 2015. According to the inspection, Point 008 was in compliance with all applicable requirements. E. Point 009 — Five (5) Arekma Hot End Surface Treatment (HEST) Systems 123/4406 Page 19 of 50 Owens -Brockway Glass Container, Inc. Operating Permit No. 06OPWE289 Technical Review Document — Initial Operating Permit The moulded glass is treated in the HEST process where monobutyltin trichloride (MBTT) is applied within the hood of the system. The material creates a coating of tin oxide on the outside of the containers. The HEST systems are not equipped with any controls. 1. Applicable Requirements According to the Title V permit application, Point 009 commenced operation in August 2005. Colorado Construction Permit No. 03WE1151 was issued as a facility wide permit including Point 009 on May 25, 2004 as an initial approval permit. A final approval permit was issued for Colorado Construction Permit No. 03WE1151 on May 1, 2007. The most recent issuance, Issuance 3, was issued on July 17, 2015. Please note that the requirements apply to all five (5) HEST systems combined unless otherwise noted. The appropriate applicable requirements from Colorado Construction Permit 03WE1151 for Point 009 are as follows: • Condition 9: Opacity — Visible emissions shall not exceed 20% during normal operation of the source. During periods of startup, process modification, or adjustment of control equipment visible emissions shall not exceed 30% opacity for more than six minutes in any sixty consecutive minutes. Opacity shall be determined using EPA Method 9. Visible emissions are not expected to occur during normal operation of the HES I system because the point consists ot only VUG and HAP emissions. The Division typically does not include opacity limits in permits for VOC and HAP sources. • Condition 6: Facility wide emission imitation: VOC - 41.20 tons per year. The VOC emission limitation for all five HEST systems combined of 24.53 tons per year has been included for this point. The 24.53 tons per year is part of the facility wide VOC limitation from the construction permit. Compliance with the annual emission limit shall be determined in a twelve month rolling calculation. • Condition 8: Consumption of monobutyltin trichloride (MBTT) in the HEST machines shall not exceed 70,080 lbs per year. Compliance with the consumption limit shall be determined in a twelve month rolling total. The amount of MBTT consumed is monitored by keeping records of the amount of totes used. 2. Emission Factors Emissions from the HEST systems are formed when the monobutyltin trichloride (MBTT) is applied to the moulded containers. Each HEST system is designed to emit 1.6 lbs of MBTT per hour operated; the HEST systems are expected to be 123/4406 Page 20 of 50 Owens -Brockway Glass Container, Inc. Operating Permit No. 06OPWE289 Technical Review Document —Initial Operating Permit running at 8,760 hours per year. It has been assumed that thirty percent (30%) of the MBTT is applied to the containers and the other seventy percent (70%) is emitted as VOC. Please note that hydrochloric acid is a reportable Hazardous Air Pollutant for this point. 3. Monitoring Plan To determine compliance with all requirements, the VOC emissions and the consumption of monobutyltin trichloride shall be monitored on a monthly basis. 4. Compliance Status The Title V permit application indicates that Point 009 is in compliance with all applicable requirements. The Division conducted a full compliance inspection on the facility on January 12, 2015. According to the inspection, Point 009 was in compliance with all applicable requirements. F. Point 011 and 012 — Two (2) Caterpillar 3412CDITA Diesel Fired Compression Ignition Emergency Generators, Each Site Rated at 823 HP 1. Applicable Requirements According to the Title V permit application, Points 011 and 012 commenced operation in August 2005. Colorado Construction Permit No. 03WE1151 was issued as a facility wide permit including Points 011 and 012 on May 25, 2004 as an initial approval permit. A final approval permit was issued for Colorado Construction Permit No. 03WE1151 on May 1, 2007. The most recent issuance, Issuance 3, was issued on July 17, 2015. Please note that the requirements for Point 011 and 012 apply to each engine individually unless stated otherwise. The appropriate applicable requirements from Colorado Construction Permit 03WE1151 for Points 011 and 012 are as follows: • Condition 9: Opacity — Visible emissions shall not exceed 20% during normal operation of the source. During periods of startup, process modification, or adjustment of control equipment visible emissions shall not exceed 30% opacity for more than six minutes in any sixty consecutive minutes. Opacity shall be determined using EPA Method 9. This condition has been included in the Operating Permit. Compliance with the opacity standards is determined by conducting annual EPA Method 9 observations. If the emergency generator is operated more than 250 hours in a calendar year period, a second EPA Method 9 observation shall be conducted. If the emergency generator is not operated during the calendar year, no EPA Method 9 observation will be required. • Condition 6: Facility wide emission limitation: NOx - 220.67 tons per year. 123/4406 Page 21 of 50 Owens -Brockway Glass Container, Inc. Operating Permit No. 06OPWE289 Technical Review Document — Initial Operating Permit The NOx emission limitation for each engine of 3.7 tons per year has been included for this point. The 3.7 tons per year is a part of the facility wide NOx limitation from the construction permit. The emission limitation has been calculated at 500 hours per year in accordance with EPA's September 6, 1995 memo Calculating Potential to Emit (PTE) for Emergency Generators. Compliance with the emission limits will be determined by a twelve month rolling total calculation. • Condition 8: The diesel powered engines shall not operate more than 500 hours per year each. Compliance with the hours of operation will be determined by a twelve month rolling total calculation. In addition to the Construction Permit Conditions, the following applicable requirements have been incorporated into the Operating Permit: • 40 CFR 60 Subpart 1111, New Source Performance Standards, Standards of Performance for Stationary Compression Ignition Internal Combustion Engines. The final rule for 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart 1111was revised and published in the Federal Register on June 28, 2011. Point 011 and 012 commenced rnnstnintinn (were nrriererd by the nwner nr nneratnr) and were manufactured prior to July 11, 2005. They are not subject to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart 1111. • 40 CFR 63 Subpart ZZZZ, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pnlluitantg fnr Statinnan. Rerinrnrotinn Internal r'nmhiwgtinn Pnnince On January 18, 2008 a revision to the RICE MACT was made to address any size engine located at an area source. Points 011 and 012 commenced construction prior to June 12, 2006. They are classified as existing stationary RICE located at an area source of HAP emissions. These engines are not subject to MACT ZZZZ as long as they meet the definition of an emergency stationary RICE in §63.6675. This definition includes operating by the provisions of §63.6640(f). The appropriate operating provisions from MACT ZZZZ have been included in the Operating Permit. • Recordkeeping of diesel fuel consumption has been added to the operation permit to aid in calculation of the emission limitation for NOx to determine compliance with the annual limitation. Diesel fuel consumption is calculated by multiplying the hours of operation for each engine that month by the maximum hourly fuel consumption rate for each engine. 2. Emission Factors Emissions from the engines are produced from combustion of the fuel. The emission factors are listed below. 123/4406 Page 22 of 50 Owens -Brockway Glass Container, Inc. Operating Permit No. 06OPWE289 Technical Review Document — Initial Operating Permit Pollutant Emission Factor Source Ib/MMBtu g/hp-hr NOx SOX VOC CO PM PMio PM2.5 Formaldehyde 2.662 8.18 Manufacturer 0.303 0.93 Manufacturer 0.02 0.06 Manufacturer 0.215 0.66 Manufacturer 0.031 0.094 Manufacturer 0.031 0.094 Manufacturer 0.031 0.094 Manufacturer 7.89E-05 AP -42, Chapter 3.4, Table 3.4-3 The emission factors are based on the diesel fuel heating value of 0.137 MMBtu/gal, the site -rated horsepower of 823 HP, and the fuel usage of 40.7 gal/hr. Calculation of the Pollutant Potential to Emit (PTE) of each engine is based on the above emission factors, the fuel heating value, and 500 hours per year of operation (see EPA memo 9-6-95 — Calculating PTE for Emergency Generators). Please note that only NOx emissions are greater than APEN reporting thresholds so it is the only limitation included in the Operating Permit (Colorado Regulation No. 3, Part A, Section II.B.3.a). 3. Monitoring Plan To determine compliance with all requirements, the NOx emissions, diesel fuel consumption, and hours of operation shall be monitored and recorded monthly. An EPA Method 9 opacity observation is required annually. If the engine operates more than 250 hours per year a second EPA Method 9 opacity observation is required. 4. Compliance Status The Title V permit application indicates that Points 011 and 012 are in compliance with all applicable requirements. The Division conducted a full compliance inspection on the facility on January 12, 2015. According to the inspection, Points 011 and 012 were in compliance with all applicable requirements. G. Point 015 — Packing Operations: Three (3) Marsh VJ Patrion Plus Carton Printing Machines, Three (3) Nordson PRO Blue Hot Glue Machines, and Four (4) O -I Custom Built Cold End Spray Machines 1. Applicable Requirements According to the Title V permit application, Point 015 commenced operation in August 2005. Colorado Construction Permit No. 03WE1151 was issued as a facility wide permit including Point 015 on May 25, 2004 as an initial approval permit. A final approval permit was issued for Colorado Construction Permit No. 03WE1151 on May 1, 2007. The most recent issuance, Issuance 3, was issued on July 17, 123/4406 Page 23 of 50 Owens -Brockway Glass Container, Inc. Operating Permit No. 06OPWE289 Technical Review Document — Initial Operating Permit 2015. The appropriate provisions of Issuance 3 of the construction permit have been directly incorporated into this operating permit. The appropriate applicable requirements from Colorado Construction Permit 03WE1151 for Point 015 are as follows: • Condition 6: Facility wide emission limitations: VOC - 42.2 tons per year, PM - 115.42 tons per year, PM10 - 91.09 tons per year, and PM2.5 - 91.09 tons per year. The point emission limitation for VOC has changed from requested VOC emission limitation in the operating permit application from 9.8 tons per year of VOC to 12.7 tons per year of VOC. The VOC emissions of 12.7 tons per year are a part of the facility wide VOC emission limitation. The new VOC emission limit consists of VOC emissions from the three (3) carton printing machines, three (3) hot glue machines, and four (4) cold end spray machines. The VOC emission limitation used in the operating permit application was only considering the VOC emissions from the three (3) carton printing machines. Compliance with the annual VOC emission limitation is determined by adding the emissions from the carton printing machines, hot glue machines, and cold end spray machines together in a rolling twelve month total. Emissionls for particulate matter (P f VI, PIM10, and PIV12.5) for Point 6115 were not included in the facility wide particulate matter emission limitation or the operating permit application. Particulate matter emissions of 30.4 tons per year have been included in the operating permit. Particulate matter emissions are only from the cold end spray machines. Compliance with the annual particulate matter emission limitations is determined on a twelve month rolling total. • Condition 9: Visible emissions shall not exceed twenty percent (20%) opacity during normal operation of the source. During periods of startup, process modification, or adjustment of control equipment visible emissions shall not exceed thirty percent (30%) opacity for more than six minutes in any sixty consecutive minutes. Opacity shall be determined using EPA Method 9. Compliance with the opacity requirement is determined by conducting annual EPA Reference Method 9 observations by a certified Method 9 reader. • Condition 16: For emission point 015, annual records of the actual quantity of each primer, coating, reducer, thinner, glue, chemical and solvent used and current Material Safety Data Sheets for each primer, coating, reducer, thinner, glue, chemical and solvent shall be maintained by the applicant and made available to the Division for inspection upon request. Filing an APEN shall not be required solely due to the substitution of alternate materials. 123/4406 Page 24 of 50 Owens -Brockway Glass Container, Inc. Operating Permit No. 06OPWE289 Technical Review Document — Initial Operating Permit The Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) for each material used shall be maintained as part of the emissions records as follows: For each material in use, the MSDS in the record shall be the most recent MSDS available; For each material for which the source has discontinued use, the MSDS which is current at the time use of the material is discontinued shall be kept in the record. Annual records of the actual consumption rates and materials used shall be maintained by the applicant and made available to the Division for inspection upon request. Annual emissions of volatile organic compounds shall be calculated by the end of January of each year for the previous year. This condition has been included in the operating permit. Calculation of VOC emissions has been changed to monthly in rolling twelve month calculation. The product consumption has also been changed to monthly calculation and recordkeeping in order to determine compliance with the annual emission limitations. The current and previous MSDS sheets are required to be kept on site. • Condition 18 and 19: This source is subject to the process weight rate of Regulation No. 6, Part B, Section III.C. Colorado Regulation No. 6, Part B, Section 111.0 has been streamlined from the permit and replaced by the Particulate Matter Standards from Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section III.C. See discussion of streamlining under the Streamlined Conditions, Section IV of this document, and discussion of the Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section III.C applicability below in this Section III.G.1. In addition to the Construction Permit Conditions, the following applicable requirements have been incorporated into the Operating Permit: • Product consumption from the carton printing machines, the hot glue machines, and the cold end spray machines shall be monitored and recorded on a monthly basis. This condition has been included in the operating permit to aid in the monthly emissions calculations. • Colorado Regulation No.1, Section III.C, Emission Control Regulations for Particulate Matter for Manufacturing Processes. Point 015 is defined as a manufacturing process (see definition in Section II1.B.1) with a process weight rate greater than 30 tons per hour. It is subject to the requirements of Section III.C.1.b, the allowable particulate emissions in lbs per hour (30.69 lbs per hour) was determined from the process weight rate of total glass production (35.83 tons of glass produced per hour). 123/4406 Page 25 of 50 Owens -Brockway Glass Container, Inc. Operating Permit No. 06OPWE289 Technical Review Document — Initial Operating Permit Compliance with this regulation shall be determined by keeping a record of calculation demonstrating compliance with the emission limitation on site. 2. Emission Factors Emissions from the packing operations are produced from evaporative loss during the application of product. The carton printing and hot glue machines are assumed one hundred percent (100%) evaporative loss during product application. The cold end spray is assumed a seventy percent (70%) evaporative loss during product application, for particulate matter emissions the cold end spray is assumed 100% is emitted. The carton printing, hot glue, and cold end spray machines emission limitations were calculated based on limited product consumption and the VOC content of that product. The product consumption used for all three (3) carton printing was based at 2,400 gallons per year, all three (3) hot glue machines was based at 168,000 lbs per year, and all four (4) ccild end spray machines vvaa based at 7,300 gallons per year. To determine emissions of VOC from the carton printing, hot glue, and cold end spray machines the following VOC content per units of product consumed was used: Source VOC Content Units Carton Printing Machines Hot Glue Machines Cold End Spray 9.OR Ihs VOC per gallon 0.02 lbs VOC per lbs hot glue 0.06 lbs VOC per gallon To determine emissions of particulate miattcr, the particulate 'Totter content per gallon of product consumed for each cold end spray machine is 8.32 lbs particulate matter per gallon. The cold end spray machines are the only packing operation that produces particulate matter emissions. Please note that glycol ethers are a reportable Hazardous Air Pollutant for this point. 3. Monitoring Plan To determine compliance with all applicable requirements, VOC, PM, PM10, and PM2,5 emissions shall be monitored and recorded monthly, product consumption shall be monitored and recorded monthly, EPA Method 9 opacity readings shall be conducted annually, records of all MSDS sheets shall be kept on site, and records of calculation for compliance with the particulate requirement from Colorado Regulation No. 1 shall be kept on site. 4. Compliance Status The Title V permit application indicates that Point 015 is in compliance with all applicable requirements. The Division conducted a full compliance inspection on the facility on January 12, 2015. According to the inspection, Point 015 was in compliance with all applicable requirements. H. Point 017 — Mould Shop 123/4406 Page 26 of 50 Owens -Brockway Glass Container, Inc. Operating Permit No. 06OPWE289 Technical Review Document — Initial Operating Permit The mould shop is equipped with one dust collector to collect emissions produced during the mould and machine repair operations that occur in the mould shop. This point was submitted as an insignificant activity in the Operating Permit application in 2006. This point has particulate matter emissions that exceed the APEN threshold, making it subject to the Operating Permit requirements. Emission calculations were submitted to the Division for this point on August 20, 2015. This point was not included in the most recent facility wide Construction Permit No. 03WE1151 issued on July 17, 2015. 1. Applicable Requirements According to the Title V permit application, Point 017 commenced operation in January 2005. The appropriate applicable requirements that have been included in the operating permit for the mould shop are as follows: • Annual Emission Limitation: PM, PM10, and PM2 5- 2.25 tons per year. The annual emission limitations are based on the manufacture's equipment ratings for flow, control equipment efficiency, and maximum operation at 8760 hours per year. The dust collector was rated at 80% control efficiency. Compliance with the annual emission limit will be based on a rolling twelve month total. • The hours of operation of the mould shop shall be monitored on a monthly basis to aid in calculation of the monthly emissions. • The opacity requirements from Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section II.A.1 and II.A.4 have been included for Point 017. Compliance with the opacity limitations will be determined by conducting EPA Method 9 observations on an annual basis. • Quarterly inspections of the mould shops dust collector to ensure the pressure drop across each bag is within manufacturer's specifications has been included from the facilities most recent Operation and Maintenance (O&M) plan submitted on March 11, 2015. • Colorado Regulation No. 6, Part B, Section III.C, Standards for Particulate Matter for New Manufacturing Processes. Colorado Regulation No. 6, Part B, Section III.C has been streamlined from the permit and replaced by the Particulate Matter Standards from Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section III.C. See discussion of streamlining under the Streamlined Conditions, Section IV of this document, and discussion of the Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section 111.0 applicability below in this Section III.H.1. • Colorado Regulation No.1, Section 111.0, Emission Control Regulations for Particulate Matter for Manufacturing Processes. 123/4406 Page 27 of 50 Owens -Brockway Glass Container, Inc. Operating Permit No. 06OPWE289 Technical Review Document — Initial Operating Permit Point 017 is considered a manufacturing process (see definition in Section III.B.1) with a process weight rate greater than 30 tons per hour. It is subject to the requirements of Section III.C.1.b, the allowable particulate emissions in lbs per hour (30.69 lbs per hour) was determined from the process weight rate of total glass production (35.83 tons of glass produced per hour). Compliance with this regulation shall be determined by keeping a record of calculation demonstrating compliance with the emission limitation on site. 2. Emission Factors Emissions from the mould shops are produced during mould and machine repair operations. The emission factors for PM, PM10 and PM2.5 were back calculated from information provided by the manufacturer of uncontrolled emissions of 0.05 grains of particulate matter per dry standard rLlhin font processed and maximum flow of 6,000 dry standard cubic feet. An 80% control has been applied for the mould shop dust collector. Emission Factors are shown below: Pollutant PM PM, 0 PMz 5 Uncontrolled Emission Factor Controlled Emission Factor (lb/hr) (lb/hr) 2.571 2.571 2.571 0.514 0.514 0.514 The ratio of PM to PM10 and PMtc to PM2,5 is not known so it has been assumed that PI11110 and I IVI2 5 emissions are aqua! to PM. V VIIlIC using this approach total PM emissions are not determined by adding PM10 and PM2.5. 3. Monitoring Plan To determine compliance with all applicable requirements, PM, PM10, and PM2.5 emissions shall be monitored and recorded monthly, the hours of operation will be recorded monthly, and annual EPA Method 9 observations shall be conducted. I. Point 018 — Two (2) Marley NC Class Cooling Towers The cooling towers at the facility have been installed to provide facility support. One cooling tower is for the systems at the facility and the other is for the furnaces. Each cooling tower is equipped with drift eliminators. The facility does not used chromium -based water treatment chemicals in the cooling towers. 1. Applicable Requirements According to the Title V permit application, Point 018 commenced operation in August 2005. Colorado Construction Permit No. 03WE1151 was issued as a facility wide permit including Point 018 on May 25, 2004 as an initial approval permit. A final approval permit was issued for Colorado Construction Permit No. 03WE1151 on 123/4406 Page 28 of 50 Owens -Brockway Glass Container, Inc. Operating Permit No. 06OPWE289 Technical Review Document — Initial Operating Permit May 1, 2007. The most recent issuance, Issuance 3, was issued on July 17, 2015. The appropriate provisions of Issuance 3 of the construction permit have been directly incorporated into this operating permit. Please note that the requirements apply to the cooling towers combined unless otherwise stated in the condition. The appropriate applicable requirements from Colorado Construction Permit 03WE1151 for Point 018 are as follows: • Condition 6: Facility wide emission limitations: PM - 115.42 tons per year, PMi0 - 91.09 tons per year, PM2.5 - 91.01 tons per year. The PM, PM10, and PM2.5 emission limitations for both cooling towers combined of 12.5 tons per year for each pollutant have been included in the permit. The 12.5 tons per year is a part of the facility wide PM, PM10, and PM2,5 emission limitation from the Construction Permit. Compliance shall be determined on a rolling twelve month total. • Condition 8: The gallons of water used per year shall not exceed 1,314 MMgal per year. • Compliance with the water circulation rate will be determined on a rolling twelve month total using each cooling towers water meter. The design rate for the systems cooling tower is 2,000 gallons per minute and the design rate for the furnaces cooling tower is 500 gallons per minute. Condition 9: Visible emissions shall not exceed twenty percent (20%) during normal operation of the source. During periods of startup, process modification, or adjustment of control equipment visible emissions shall not exceed thirty percent (30%) opacity for more than six minutes in any sixty consecutive minutes. Note that the opacity requirement during periods of startup, process modification, or adjustment of control equipment is not included in the operation permit. The Division has determined that none of these special conditions under Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section II.A.4 for the thirty percent (30%) opacity are applicable to the cooling towers. Compliance with the twenty percent (20%) opacity standards can be presumed provided the cooling towers are designed and operated as set forth in the operating permit. • Colorado Regulation No. 6, Part B, Section III.C, Standards for Particulate Matter for New Manufacturing Processes. Cooling towers are not defined as a part of the manufacturing process (as defined above). Point 018 is not subject to the particulate matter standards from Colorado Regulation No. 6. In addition to the Construction Permit Conditions, the following applicable requirements have been incorporated into the Operating Permit: 123/4406 Page 29 of 50 Owens -Brockway Glass Container, Inc. Operating Permit No. 06OPWE289 Technical Review Document —Initial Operating Permit • • Colorado Regulation No.1, Section III.C, Emission Control Regulations for Particulate Matter for Manufacturing Processes. Cooling towers are not defined as a part of the manufacturing process (as defined above). Point 018 is not subject to the particulate matter regulations from Colorado Regulation No. 1. 2. Emission Factors Emissions from the cooling towers are produced when liquid water that is entrained in the air stream and carried out of the tower as "drift" droplets. The emission factor for Particulate Matter (PM, PM10, and PM25) is from AP -42, Chapter 13.4, Table 13.4-1, Wet Cooling Towers (dated 1/95). 3. Monitoring Plan To determine compliance with all applicable requirements, PM, PM1o, and PM2.5 emissions shall be monitored and recorded monthly, the water circulation rate will be calculated monthly, and the hours of operation will be recorded monthly. 4. Compliance Status The Title V permit application indicates that Point (11 R is in cnmpliance with all applicable requirements. The Division conducted a full compliance inspection on the facility on January 12, 2015. According to the inspection, Point 018 was in compliance with all applicable requirements .I, point n19 and n2n — Three (n) Flex Klnnn Ratnh Hnii n Must r:ndlertnrc and Thirty Six (36) Flex Kleen Batch House Dust Collectors Point 019 consists of three (3) dust collectors that are a part of the unloading and conveying of glass raw materials including sand, soda ash, limestone, etc. All processes are enclosed and emissions from the dust collectors are vented into the unloading enclosure. Point 020 consists of thirty-three (33) dust collectors that are a part of the conveying, weighing, mixing, storing, and delivering materials to the furnace of glass raw materials including sand, soda ash, limestone, etc. All processes are enclosed and the emissions are vented into the batch house building. Point 019 and 020 control the particulate emissions from the elevator boots and unloading areas. The table below contains the different batch house dust collectors used in the batch house. AIRS Equipment Make Model Serial ID ID Number 019 C019 Flex Kleen 100WSBS10011IG 30747 019 C019 Flex Kleen 100WSBS100IIIG 30747 019 C019 Flex Kleen 84BVTS361IIG 30752 020 C020 Flex Kleen 58BVTS2511G 30751 020 C020 Flex Kleen 58BVTS2511G 30751 123/4406 Page 30 of 50 Owens -Brockway Glass Container, Inc. Operating Permit No. 060PWE289 Technical Review Document — Initial Operating Permit 020 C020 Flex Kleen 58BVTS2511G 30751 020 C020 Flex Kleen 58BVTS2511G 30751 020 C020 Flex Kleen 58BVTS2511G 30751 020 C020 Flex Kleen 58BVTS25IIG 30751 020 C020 Flex Kleen 58BVTS2511G 30751 020 C020 Flex Kleen 58BVTS2511G 30751 020 C020 Flex Kleen 58BVTS25IIG 30751 020 C020 Flex Kleen 58BVTS2511G 30751 020 C020 Flex Kleen 58BVTS2511G 30749 020 C020 Flex Kleen 58BVTS2511G 30751 020 C020 Flex Kleen 58BVTS25IIG 30751 020 C020 Flex Kleen 58BVTS2511G 30751 020 C020 Flex Kleen 58BVTS2511G 30751 020 C020 Flex Kleen 58BVTS2511G 30751 020 C020 Flex Kleen 58BVTS2511G 30751 020 C020 Flex Kleen 58BVTS2511G 30751 020 C020 Flex Kleen 58BVTS2511G 30751 020 C020 Flex Kleen 58BVTS2511G 30751 020 C020 Flex Kleen 58BVTS911G 30750 020 C020 Flex Kleen 58BVTS911G 30750 020 C020 Flex Keen 58BVTS2511G 30749 020 C020 Flex Keen 58BVTS2511G 30751 020 C020 Flex Kleen 58BVTS2511G 30751 020 C020 Flex Kleen 58BVTS2511G 30751 020 C020 Flex Kleen 58BVTS2511G 30751 020 C020 Flex Kleen 58BVTS2511G 30751 020 C020 Flex Kleen 58BVTS16IIG 30748 020 C020 Flex Kleen 58BVTS25IIG 30749 020 C020 Flex Kleen 58BVTS2511G 30749 020 C020 Flex Kleen 58BVTS25IIG 30749 020 C020 Flex Kleen 58BVTS2511G 30749 1. Applicable Requirements According to the Title V permit application, Point 019 and 020 commenced operation in August 2005. Colorado Construction Permit No. 03WE1151 was issued as a facility wide permit including Point 019 and 020 on May 25, 2004 as an initial approval permit. A final approval permit was issued for Colorado Construction Permit No. 03WE1151 on May 1, 2007. The most recent issuance, Issuance 3, was issued on July 17, 2015. The appropriate provisions of Issuance 3 of the construction permit have been directly incorporated into this operating permit. Please note that the requirements apply to all dust collectors as a unit for each individual point unless stated differently in the condition. The appropriate applicable requirements from Colorado Construction Permit 03WE1151 for Point 019 and 020 are as follows: • Condition 6: Facility wide emission limitations: PM - 115.42 tons per year, PM10 - 91.09 tons per year, PM2,5 - 91.01 tons per year. The PM, PM1o, and PM25 emission limitations for Point 019 of 4.0 tons per year for each pollutant has been included in the permit. The 4.0 tons per 123/4406 Page 31 of 50 Owens -Brockway Glass Container, Inc. Operating Permit No. 06OPWE289 Technical Review Document — Initial Operating Permit year is a part of the facility wide PM, PM10, and PM2.5 emission limitation from the Construction Permit. The PM, PM10, and PM2.5 emission limitations for Point 020 of 2.0 tons per year for each pollutant has been included in the permit. The 2.0 tons per year is a part of the facility wide PM, PM10, and PM2.5 emission limitation from the Construction Permit. Compliance shall be determined on a rolling twelve month total. • Condition 7: Three (3) pulse jet baghouses shall be maintained and operated to ensure satisfactory performance for Point 019 and thirty-four (34) pulse jet baghouses shall be maintained and operated to ensure satisfactory performance for Point 020. Point 019 was defined with three dust collectors in the operating permit application. Point 020 was defined with thirty-three dust collectors in the operating permit application. As per email with the source received on August 20, 2015 Point 020 is equipped with thirty-three dust collectors not thirty-four. • Condition 9: Visible emissions shall not exceed twenty percent (20%) opacity during normal operation of the source. During periods of startup, process modification, or adjustment of control equipment visible emission shall not exceed thirty percent (30%) opacity for more than six minutes in any sixty consecutive minutes. Opacity shall be determined using EPA Method 9. Compliance with the opacity requirement is determined by conducting annual EPA Reference Method 9 observations by a certified Method 9 reader. • Condition 17: Batch house dust collectors shall be vented indoors. Emissions from Point 019 are vented into the venting enclosure and emissions from Point 020 are vented into the batch house. • Condition 18 and 19: This source is subject to the process weight rate of Regulation No. 6, Part B, Section III.C for particulate matter for new manufacturing processes. Colorado Regulation No. 6, Part B, Section III.C has been streamlined from the permit and replaced by the Particulate Matter Standards from Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section III.C. See discussion of streamlining under the Streamlined Conditions, Section IV of this document, and discussion of the Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section III.C applicability below in this Section III.J.1. In addition to the Construction Permit Conditions, the following applicable requirements have been incorporated into the Operating Permit: • Colorado Regulation No.1, Section III.C, Emission Control Regulations for Particulate Matter for Manufacturing Processes. 123/4406 Page 32 of 50 Owens -Brockway Glass Container, Inc. Operating Permit No. 06OPWE289 Technical Review Document — Initial Operating Permit Points 019 and 020 are considered manufacturing processes (see definition in Section III.B.1) with a process weight rate greater than 30 tons per hour. It is subject to the requirements of Section III.C.1.b, the allowable particulate emissions in lbs per hour (30.69 lbs per hour) was determined from the process weight rate of total glass production (35.83 tons of glass produced per hour). Compliance with this regulation shall be determined by keeping a record of calculation demonstrating compliance with the emission limitation on site. • Quarterly pressure drop inspections have been included in the operation permit. This is a requirement in the Operating and Maintenance (O&M) plan. 2. Emission Factors Emissions from the batch house operations are produced from the conveying, weighing, mixing, sorting, and delivering materials to the furnaces. There are a total of thirty-six (36) dust collectors that vent the batch house operations. The emission factors and the design rates for the dust collectors are provided in the table below. The emission factors were provided by the manufacturer. Since Point 020 is vented back inside to the batch house seventy percent (70%) control efficiency can be applied. AIRS ID 019 Batch House Dust Collector B 019 Batch House Dust Collector B 020 Batch House Dust Collector A 020 Batch House Dust Collector C 020 Batch House Dust Collector C 020 Batch House Dust Collector D 020 Batch House Dust Collector F 020 Batch House Dust Collector G 020 Batch House Dust Collector H 020 Batch House Dust Collector I Unit Number Design Rate of Units (scf/min) Emission Factor (grainlscf) Uncontrolled Controlled 2 7,500 1 4,000 6 1,000 2 1,000 1 700 2 400 2 1,000 4 1,000 14 1,000 2 1,000 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.0015 0.0015 0.0015 0.0015 0.0015 0.0015 0.0015 0.0015 3. Monitoring Plan To determine compliance with all applicable requirements, emissions will be calculated on a monthly basis, hours of operation will be monitored on a monthly basis, annual EPA Method 9 opacity readings shall be conducted, and each dust collector shall be inspected quarterly. 4. Compliance Status The Title V permit application indicates that Points 019 and 020 are in compliance with all applicable requirements. The Division conducted a full compliance inspection on the facility on January 12, 2015. According to the inspection, Points 019 and 020 were in compliance with all applicable requirements. 123/4406 Page 33 of 50 Owens -Brockway Glass Container, Inc. Operating Permit No. 06OPWE289 Technical Review Document — Initial Operating Permit K. Point 021 — Fugitive Dust Emissions from Gullet Storage Piles, Rail Car Unloading, Truck Unloading, and Haul Roads 1. Applicable Requirements According to the Title V permit application, Point 021 commenced operation in August 2005. Colorado Construction Permit No. 03WE1151 was issued as a facility wide permit including Point 021 on May 25, 2004 as an initial approval permit. A final approval permit was issued for Colorado Construction Permit No. 03WE1151 on May 1, 2007. The most recent issuance, Issuance 3, was issued on July 17, 2015.The appropriate provisions of Issuance 3 of the construction permit have been directly incorporated into this operating permit. The appropriate applicable requirements from Colorado Construction Permit 03WE1151 for Point 021 are as follows: • Condition 6: Fugitive Annual Emission Limits for PM at 48.6 tons per year, PM1p at 10.67 tons per year, PM25 at 10.67 tons per year. The fugitive annual emission limits have changed from the emission limits in the Construction Permit to PM at 38.32 tons per year, PM1c at 8.82 tons per year, and PM2.5 at 2.0 tons per year. The fugitive emissions for PM, PM1o, and PM25 consist of the particulate emissions from the cullet storage pile, rail car sand unloading, rail car raw material unloading, truck raw material unloading, truck cullet unloading, and the haul roads added together. All emissions are based on emission factors calculated from AP - 47 Chantar 13 7 1 and 13 7 d The PM and PM1n amiccinnc frnm the cullet storage pile, rail car sand unloading, rail car raw material unloading, truck raw material unloading, and truck cullet unloading have not changed since the Construction Permit issuance. PM and PM10 emission factors in AP -42 have remained the same. The emission factors for PM and PM10 for the haul roads have changed in AP -42 causing a decrease in emissions. In the Construction Permit emissions for PM10 and PM2.5 were assumed the same, AP -42 has emission factors to calculate PM2.5 resulting in a decrease in PM2.5 emissions. See the Emission Factors section for more detail. Compliance with the annual emission limits from the cullet storage piles, rail car unloading, truck unloading, and haul roads can be presumed as long as the source is in compliance with the particulate emission control plan and the limitations on quantity of materials stored, unloaded, and hauled are not exceeded. • Condition 11: The particulate emission control measures listed on the attached page (as approved by the Division) shall be applied to the particulate emission producing sources as required by Regulation No. 1, Section III.D.1.b. 123/4406 Page 34 of 50 Owens -Brockway Glass Container, Inc. Operating Permit No. 06OPWE289 Technical Review Document — Initial Operating Permit The particulate emission control plan has been included in the Operating Permit. • Condition 13: The Division's approval of the particulate emission control plan is based on the submitted production level as listed below and in the application. Prior to any increase in daily or annual production rates, the applicant shall submit an Air Pollutant Emission Notice and Control Plan revision which will be subject to Division review and approval to ensure compliance with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for particulate matter. Records of the actual production rate shall be maintained by the applicant and made available to the Division for inspection upon request. (Reference: Regulation No. 1, Section III.D.1.b). Storage of cullet in the cullet storage pile shall not exceed 62,780 tons per year. Rail car unloading of sand and raw materials shall not exceed 331,384 tons per year. Truck unloading of raw materials shall not exceed 59,349 tons per year. Rail car unloading of cullet shall not exceed 141,109 tons per year. This activity shall not result in the exceedence of the following emissions of fugitive total suspended particulates (TSP), fugitive particulate matter of less than ten microns (PM10), and fugitive particulate matter of less than 2.5 microns (PM2.5). These emission limits are based on the production rates listed above. The Division assumes that these levels are being met if the control measures stated in the approved control plan are followed and the stated process rates are not exceeded. Total Suspended Particulate: 48.6 tons per year Particulate Matter (PM10): 10.7 tons per year Particulate Matter (PM2.5): 10.7 tons per year This condition has been included in the operating permit. The emissions for all particulate matter emissions have decreased as explained above. The rail car unloading of sand and raw materials has been split to represent the amount of sand unloaded at 192,136 tons per year and the amount of raw materials unloaded at 139,248 tons per year to aid in the particulate matter emissions calculations. • Condition 18 and 19: This source is subject to the process weight rate of Regulation No. 6, Part B, Section III.C for particulate matter for new manufacturing processes. Colorado Regulation No. 6 has been streamlined out of the operating permit for the standards of Colorado Regulation No.1, Section III.C, Emission Control Regulations for Particulate Matter for Manufacturing Processes as explained in the streamlining section below. Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section III.C.2 exempts fugitive dust and fugitive 123/4406 Page 35 of 50 Owens -Brockway Glass Container, Inc. Operating Permit No. 06OPWE289 Technical Review Document — Initial Operating Permit particulate emissions as defined in Section II.A.6 of Colorado Regulation No. 1. Point 021 is a fugitive dust emission point as defined in Colorado Regulation No. 1 and is not subject to the particulate matter standards for manufacturing processes. 2. Emission Factors The fugitive dust emissions are produced from the cullet storage pile, rail car unloading of sand and raw materials, truck unloading of raw materials and cullet, and the haul roads. To estimate emissions for the cullet storage pile, rail car unloading, and truck unloading; emission factors, shown in the table below, have been calculated from AP -42, Chapter 13.2.4, Aggregate Handling and Storage Piles (dated 11/06). Source Cuilet Storage Pile Rail Car Sand Unloading Rail Car Raw Material Unloading Truck Raw Material Unloading Truck Gullet Unloading Emission Factors (lbs/ton) PM 0.0030 0.0202 0.0202 0.2020 0.0030 PM10 0.00 14 0.0095 0.0095 0.0095 0.0014 PM2.5 0.0002 0.0014 0.0014 0.0014 0.0002 The emission factors for PM, PMto, and PM2.5 have been calculated using Equation 1 as follows. m\. E = k(0.0032) x C4`M } ..� l Where E = Emission Factor in lbs per ton k = Particle size multiplier, dimensionless (PM = 0.74, PM10 = 0.35, PM2 5 = 0.053) U = Mean wind speed in miles per hour (U = 6.06) M = Material moisture content in percent (cullet storage pile and cullet truck unloading = 2.0% and rail car sand and raw material unloading, raw material truck unloading = 0.1%) A control efficiency of 90% can be applied to the rail car sand unloading, rail car raw material unloading and the truck raw material unloading for utilizing containment rings during unloading of material. To estimate emissions from the haul roads, emission factors, shown in the table below, have been calculated for each of the three delivery roads: raw material delivery road, western entrance ware delivery road, and southwestern entrance ware delivery road. The emission factors have been calculated using AP -42, Chapter 13.2.1, Paved Roads (dated 1/11). Source Emission Factors (lbs/ton) PM PMro PM,5 Raw Material Delivery Road Western Entrance Ware Delivery Road Southwestern Entrance Ware Delivery Road 3.733 2.404 2.404 0.747 0.183 0.481 0.118 0.481 0.118 Emission Factors for the haul roads have calculated using Equation 2 as follows: 123/4406 Page 36 of 50 Owens -Brockway Glass Container, Inc. Operating Permit No. 06OPWE289 Technical Review Document — Initial Operating Permit E„, = [k(sL)0.91 x (v.."z)(1 _ 4N) Where k = Particle size multiplier in lbsNMT (PM = 0.011, PM10 = 0.0022, PM25 = 0.00054) sL = Road surface silt loading in grams per square meter (raw material delivery road = 12, ware delivery roads = 7.4) W = average weight in tons of vehicles traveling the road (W = 20) P = number of "wet" days with at least 0.254 mm of precipitation in averaging period (P = 42) N = number of days in the averaging period (N = 365) Please note that the emission factors for the haul roads have been modified from the emission factors used in Construction Permit 03WE1151. Construction Permit 03WE1151 emission factors were calculated using a previous version of AP -42, Chapter 13.2.1. The AP -42, Chapter 13.2.1, particle size multiplier (k) values have been revised since the 1995 values used in CP as shown below. Size Range Particle Size Multiplier, k (IbNMT) AP -42, 5th Edition, 1/1995 AP -42, 5"' Edition, 1/2011 PM25 PM10 PM30 0.0073 0.00054 0.016 0.0022 0.082 0.011 Calculation of the emission limitation for the haul roads was based on an assumption of 100 truck deliveries per day and a road length for the raw material delivery road of 0.36 miles, western entrance ware deliver road of 0.68 miles, and the southwestern entrance ware delivery road of 1.06 miles. It was assumed that the ware truck deliveries to the raw material truck deliveries were at a 7:3 ratio. The ware truck deliveries were based on 70 truck deliveries per day and the raw material truck deliveries were based on 30 truck deliveries per day. The ware deliveries were split up between the western entrance and the southwestern entrance. This was broken into 50% split between the two entrances; meaning 35 trucks delivered through the western ware entrance and 35 trucks delivered through the southwestern ware entrance. 3. Monitoring Plan To determine compliance with all applicable requirements, PM, PM10, and PM2.5 emissions will be monitored and recorded monthly, truck deliveries and vehicle miles traveled will be monitored and recorded daily, and the quantity of materials stored, unloaded, and hauled will be monitored and recorded monthly. Compliance with the particulate control plan shall be certified semi-annually. 4. Compliance Status The Title V permit application indicates that Point 021 is in compliance with all applicable requirements. The Division conducted a full compliance inspection on the facility on January 12, 2015. According to the inspection, Point 021 was in compliance with all applicable requirements. L. Point 024 — One (1) Caterpillar C9 Diesel Fired Compression Ignition Emergency Generator, Site Rated at 457 HP 123/4406 Page 37 of 50 Owens -Brockway Glass Container, Inc. Operating Permit No. 06OPWE289 Technical Review Document — Initial Operating Permit There are no controls associated with this point. 1, Applicable Requirements According to the Title V permit application update, Point 024 commenced operation August 1, 2011. Colorado Construction Permit No. 12WE1354 was issued for Point 024 on November 16, 2012 as an initial approval permit. A final approval permit was issued for Colorado Construction Permit No. 12WE1354 on October 15, 2014. The appropriate provisions of the final approval construction permit have been directly incorporated into this operating permit The appropriate applicable requirements from Colorado Construction Permit 12WE1352 for Point 024 are as follows: • Condition 6: Hourly limits — Hours of operation will be recorded on a rolling 12- month basis and available for review upon request by the Division. Annual Limits — 0.02 tons per year PM, 0.02 tons per year PM10, 1.32 tons per year NOx. Recording of the hours of operation has been included in the Operating Permit. The Annual Emission Limitations for PM, and PM io, have not been added to the Operating Permit because they are below the criteria pollutant APEN threshold of 2 tons per year (Reference, Colorado Regulation No. 3, Part A, Section ll.B.3.a). The annual emission limitation for NOx has been included in the Operating Permit because it is over the APEN threshold of 1 ton per year. This source is located in a nnnattainment area for the A -hour ozone standards; therefore the NOx and VOC APEN threshold is 1 ton per year. • Condition 7: Process/Consumption Limits — 500 hours per year of operation. Compliance shall be monitored monthly by documenting the hours of operation off of the unit's non-resettable hour run-time meter in a log. • Condition 8: Opacity — Visible emissions shall not exceed 20% during normal operation of the source. During periods of startup, process modification, or adjustment of control equipment visible emissions shall not exceed 30% opacity for more than six minutes in any sixty consecutive minutes. Opacity shall be determined using EPA Method 9. This condition has been included in the Operating Permit. Compliance with the opacity standards is determined by conducting annual EPA Reference Method 9 observations. If the emergency generator is operated more than 250 hours in a calendar year period, a second EPA Method 9 observation shall be conducted. If the emergency generator is not operated during the calendar year, no EPA Method 9 observation will be required. 123/4406 Page 38 of 50 II Owens -Brockway Glass Container, Inc. Operating Permit No. 06OPWE289 Technical Review Document — Initial Operating Permit • Condition 9: This source is subject to the odor requirements of Regulation No. 2. This condition is included in the General Conditions of Section VI and was not included in the specific conditions for Point 024 in the Operating Permit. • Condition 10: 40 CFR 60, New Source Performance Standards (NSPS), Standards of Performance for Stationary Compression Ignition Internal Combustion Engines Requirements. The final rule for 40 CFR Part 60 Subpart IIII was revised and published in the Federal Register on June 28, 2011. Point 024 is classified as a 2007 model year and later emergency stationary CI ICE with a displacement of less than 30 liters per cylinder that is not a fire pump engine. Point 024 is EPA Certified for Stationary Emergency Application at the EPA Tier 3 Emissions Level and must comply with the Tier Ill emission limitations for model engines 225 ≤ kW ≤ 450. The appropriate provisions from Subpart 1111 have been included in the Operation Permit. • Condition 11: The requirements of Colorado Regulation No. 6, Part A, Subpart A, General Provisions apply. Because Point 024 is subject to NSPS 1111, it is also subject to NSPS A — General Provisions. The appropriate general provisions have been included in the Operating Permit. • Condition 12: The source is located in an ozone non -attainment or attainment -maintenance area and subject to the Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) requirements of Regulation No. 3, Part B, Section II.D.2.b. This condition has been included in the Operation Permit. The RACT for VOC and NOx emissions shall be met by complying with the NSPS Subpart 1111 requirements. • Condition 16: The AIRS ID number shall be marked on the subject equipment for ease of identification. This is a construction permit only requirement; it has not been included in the specific conditions for Point 024 of the Operating Permit. • Condition 17: APEN reporting requirements. The APEN reporting requirements are included in the General Conditions of Section VI, this requirement was not included in the specific conditions for Point 024 of the Operating Permit. In addition to the Construction Permit Conditions, the following applicable requirements have been incorporated into the Operating Permit. 123/4406 Page 39 of 50 Owens -Brockway Glass Container, Inc. Operating Permit No. 06OPWE289 Technical Review Document — Initial Operating Permit • Recordkeeping of diesel fuel consumption has been added to the operation permit to aid in calculation of the emission limitation for NOx to determine compliance with the annual limitation. • 40 CFR 63 Subpart ZZZZ, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Stationary Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines. On January 18, 2008 a revision to the RICE MACT was made to address any size engine located at an area source. Under the 2008 revisions, new engines (commenced construction on or after June 12, 2006) that are located at an area source meet the requirements of MACT ZZZZ by meeting the requirements of 40 CFR Part 60 Subpart JJJJ or 1111 (Reference §63.6590(c)(1)). Point 024 is a new engine located at an area source that is subject to NSPS 1111, so the requirements of MACT ZZZZ have been met for this unit. 2. Emission Factors The emission factors for Point 024 are as follows: Pollutant Emission Factor Source Ib/MMBtu g/hp-hr NOx 1.33 4.11 Manufacturer SOx 0.29 -- AP -42, Chapter 3.3, Table 3.3-1 VOC 0.019 0.06 Manufacturer CO 0.081 0.25 Manufacturer PM 0.011 0.33 Manufacturer PM,n 0.011 0 33 Manufacturer Formaldehyde 0.00118 -- AP -42, Chapter 3.3, Table 3.3-2 The emission factors are based on the diesel fuel heating value of 0.137 MMBtu/gal, the site -rated horsepower of 457 HP, and the fuel usage of 22.7 gal/hr. Calculation of the Pollutant Potential to Emit (PTE) of the Point 024 is based on the above emission factors, the fuel heating value, and 500 hours per year of operation (see EPA memo 9-6-95 — Calculating PTE for Emergency Generators). Please note that only NOx emissions are greater than APEN reporting thresholds so it is the only limitation included in the Operating Permit (Colorado Regulation No. 3, Part A, Section 11.B.3.a). Since this facility is located in the 8 -hour nonattainment area for Ozone, the APEN reporting threshold for NOx and VOC is 1 ton per year. Emissions of NOx exceed this threshold so it has been included in the operating permit. 3. Monitoring Plan To determine compliance with all requirements, NOx emissions shall be monitored and recorded on a monthly basis and an EPA Method 9 opacity observation is required annually. If the engine operates more than 250 hours per year a second EPA Method 9 opacity observation is required. The hours of operation shall be monitored and recorded monthly using the non-resettable hour meter. 123/4406 Page 40 of 50 Owens -Brockway Glass Container, Inc. Operating Permit No. 06OPWE289 Technical Review Document — Initial Operating Permit 4. Compliance Status The Title V permit application indicates that Point 024 is in compliance with all applicable requirements. The Division conducted a full compliance inspection on the facility on January 12, 2015. According to the inspection, Point 024 was in compliance with all applicable requirements. M. Point 025 — Automatic Blank Lubrication System The automatic blank lubrication system uses partially burned acetylene to coat moulds as a lubricant to release the glass once cooled. 1. Applicable Requirements Point 025 commenced operation on October 20, 2015 and a Notification of Startup was received by the division on October 30, 2015. Colorado Construction Permit No. 03WE1151 was issued as a facility wide permit including Point 025 on July 17, 2015 as an initial approval permit. The appropriate applicable requirements from Colorado Construction Permit 03WE1151 for Point 025 are as follows: • Condition 6: Facility wide emission limitations: PM — 115.42 tons per year, PM10 and PM2.5 — 91.09 tons per year. The emission limitations for each pollutant have been included in the permit as individual emission point limitations: PM, PM10, and PM2.5 — 2.6 tons per year. These limitations are part of the facility wide emission limitations from the Construction Permit. Compliance shall be determined on a rolling twelve month total. • Condition 1: You must notify the Air Pollution Control Division no later than fifteen days after commencement of operation of Point 025 under this permit by submitting a Notice of Startup (NOS) form to the Division. Failure to notify the Division of startup of the permitted source is a violation of AQCC Regulation No. 3, Part B, Section lll.B.1 and can result in the revocation of the permit. The NOS was received by the Division on October 30, 2015. This condition was not included in the operating permit. • Condition 2: Within one hundred and eighty days (180) after commencement of operation of Point 025, compliance with the conditions contained on this permit shall be demonstrated to the Division. It is the permittee's responsibility to self certify compliance with the conditions. Failure to demonstrate compliance within 180 days may result in revocation of the parts of the permit pertaining to Point 025 or enforcement action by the Division. This condition was not included in the operating permit. The self certification was received by the Division on June 21, 2016. 123/4406 Page 41 of 50 Owens -Brockway Glass Container, Inc. Operating Permit No. o6OPWE289 Technical Review Document— Initial Operating Permit • Condition 3: The portions of this permit pertaining to Point 025 shall expire if the owner or operator of the source of Point 025: (i) does not commence construction/modification or operation of this source within 18 months after either, the date of issuance of this construction permit or the date on which such construction or activity was scheduled to commence as set forth in the permit application associated with this permit; (ii) discontinues construction for a period of eighteen months or more; (iii) does not complete construction within a reasonable time of the estimated completion date. The condition has not been included in the operating permit, construction commenced on October 20, 2015. • Condition 5: Within thirty (30) days after commencement of operation of Point 025, the AIRS ID number shall be marked on the subject equipment for ease of identification. This is a construction permit only requirement, it has not been included in the operating permit. • Condition 9: Visible emissions shall not exceed twenty percent (20%) opacity during normal operation of the source. During periods of startup, process modification, or adjustment of control equipment visible emissions shall not exceed thirty percent (30%) opacity for more than six minutes in any sixty consecutive minutes. Opacity shall be determined using EPA Method 9. Compliance with the opacity requirement is determined by conducting annual EPA Reference Method 9 observations by a certified Method 9 reader. • Condition 18 and 19: This source is subject to the process weight rate of Regulation No. 6, Part B, Section III.C. Colorado Regulation No. 6, Part B, Section III.C has been streamlined from the permit and replaced by the Particulate Matter Standards from Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section III.C applicability below in the Section III.M.1. In addition to the Construction Permit Conditions, The following applicable requirements have been incorporated into the Operating Permit: • Monthly monitoring and recording of the hours of operation has been included in the operating permit so compliance with the annual emission limitations can be verified. • Colorado Regulation No.1, Section III.C, Emission Control Regulations for Particulate Matter for Manufacturing Processes. Point 025 is a manufacturing process (see definition of manufacturing process in Section III.B.1 of this document) with a process weight rate 123/4406 Page 42 of 50 Owens -Brockway Glass Container, Inc. Operating Permit No. 06OPWE289 Technical Review Document — Initial Operating Permit greater than 30 tons per hour. It is subject to the requirements of Section III.C.1.b, the allowable particulate emissions in lbs per hour (30.69 lbs per hour) was determined from the process weight rate of total glass production (35.83 tons of glass produced per hour). Compliance with this regulation shall be determined by keeping a record of calculation demonstrating compliance with the emission limitation on site. • Daily inspections on the ABL Burner Tips and Spark Electrodes and cleaning of the burner tip and spark electrode when blockages are identified has been included in the operating permit. This was a requirement in the Operating and Maintenance Plan dated 5/24/2016. 2. Emission Factors The source submitted a testing report to verify emission factors for the automatic blank lubricant system. The ratio of PM to PM10 and PM10 to PM2.5 is not known so it has been assumed that PM10 and PM2,5 emissions are equal to PM. While using this approach total PM emissions are not determined by adding PM10 and PM2.5. 3. Monitoring Plan To determine compliance with all applicable requirements, emissions of PM, PM1o, and PM25 will be calculated on a monthly basis, hours of operation will be monitored and recorded monthly, annual EPA Method 9 observations are required to determine compliance with the opacity requirement, and the source must self certify as required in the commencement of construction requirements. N. Other Requirements 1. Applicable Requirements The Colorado Construction Permit 03WE1151 includes facility -wide requirements that were incorporated into the Operating Permit as follows: • Condition 25: The AIRS point ID number shall be marked on the subject equipment for ease of identification. This is a construction permit only requirement, it has not been included in the operating permit. • Condition 26: APEN reporting requirements. The APEN reporting requirements are included in the General Conditions of Section VI and are not included in the specific conditions. • Condition 10: Odor - This source is subject to the odor requirements of Regulation No. 2. 123/4406 Page 43 of 50 Owens -Brockway Glass Container, Inc. Operating Permit No. 06OPWE289 Technical Review Document — Initial Operating Permit This condition is included in the General Conditions of Section VI and was not included in the specific conditions. • Condition 24: All previous versions of this permit are canceled upon issuance of this permit. This condition applies only to the construction permit issuance and was not included in the operating permit. • Condition 21: The owner or operator shall develop an operating and maintenance (O&M) plan, along with a recordkeeping format, that outlines how the applicant will maintain compliance on an ongoing basis with the requirements of this permit. Compliance with the O&M plan shall commence at startup. Within one hundred and eighty days (180) after commencement of operation, the owner or operator shall submit the O&M plan to the Division. Failure to submit an acceptable operating and maintenance plan could result in the revocation of the permit. Note that the Division may modify the monitoring requirements as part of the Title V Operating Permit if this facility is subject to the Title V permitting. The appropriate provisions from the operating and maintenance plan have been included in the operating permit. • Condition 20: Usage of all rental compressor engines at this: site shall not exceed 500 hours per year combined. If uncontrolled actual emissions from any one compressor engine will be 2.0 tons per year or more at this site their that unit must get a Construction Permit from the Division) prier to location at this facility. This condition has been included in the operating permit facility wide requirements; the limit of 2.0 tons per year has been changed to 1.0 tons per year of NOx since this source is located in a Nonattainment Area. • Condition 27: Public access shall be precluded in all areas within the modeling receptor exclusion zone as submitted with the modeling in the application. The exclusion zone shall be fenced and posted with no trespassing signs. This condition has been included in the operating permit facility wide requirements. IV. Streamlining of Applicable Requirements Colorado Regulation No. 6, Part B, Section III.C, New Manufacturing Process Standards for Particulate Matter has been streamlined out for Points 001, 002, 003, 006, 008, 015, 017, 019, 020, and 025. This requirement has been streamlined out in favor of the Particulate Matter standards in Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section III.C. The emission limitation is the same for both requirements; however, Colorado Regulation No. 1 requires the Particulate Matter limits during startup, shutdown, and malfunction when Regulation No. 6 does not. Therefore the Colorado Regulation No. 123/4406 Page 44 of 50 Owens -Brockway Glass Container, Inc. Operating Permit No. 06OPWE289 Technical Review Document — Initial Operating Permit 1 Particulate Matter requirement is considered by the Division to be more stringent than the Regulation No. 6 Particulate Matter requirement and the Regulation No. 6 requirement is streamlined out. Colorado Regulation No. 6, Part B, Section III.D, New Manufacturing Process Standards for Sulfur Dioxide has been streamlined out for Points 001 and 002. This requirement has been streamlined out in favor of the Sulfur Dioxide requirements in Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section VI.B. The emission limitation is the same for both requirements; however, Colorado Regulation No. 1 requires the Sulfur Dioxide limits during startup, shutdown, and malfunction when Regulation No. 6 does not. Therefore the Colorado Regulation No. 1 Sulfur Dioxide requirements are considered by the Division to be more stringent than the Regulation No. 6 Sulfur Dioxide requirements and the Regulation No. 6 requirements are streamlined out. V. Insignificant Activities The source submitted a list of insignificant activities in their Title V application. The source provided an estimate of emissions from each insignificant activity as follows: Source Description NOx (tPY) CO (tPY) VOC (tPY) 5O2 (tPY) PM ItpO) PM10 (WO PM2.5 (tpy) *Units with emissions less than APEN de minimis — criteria pollutants (Reg 3, Part C.II.E.3.a) Point 004 — Four �4) Alcoves (1.7 MMBtu/hr each) 1Point 2.98 2.50 0.16 0.02 0.0 0.23 0.0 0.23 0.0 0.23 0.0 007 — Eight (8) Belt Burners (0.05 MMBtu/hr each)' Eight, 0.0 0.0 0.0 Point 010 — Four (4) Pre -heat Mould Ovens (0.5 MMBtu/hr each)"0.88 0.74 0.05 0.01 0.07 0.07 0.07 Point 013 — Two (2)Diesel Fired Water Pumps (150 Hp) 3 0.68 0.06 0.01 0.08 0.01 0.01 0.01 Point 014 — Eight (8) Bottle Coders 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Point 016 — Degreasers/Delivery Equipment Coding 0.0 0.0 2.54 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Point 022 — One (1) Cullet Crusher 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.03 0.0 0.0 *Each individual piece of fuel burning equipment, other than smokehouse generators and internal combustion engines, that uses gaseous fuel, and that has a design rate less than or equal to five million British thermal units per hour (5 MMBtu/hr) (Reg 3, Part C.II.E.3.k) Four (4) Water Heaters 0.6 0.51 0.03 I 0.0 0.05 0.05 0.05 Point 005— Four 3(4)Forehearths(3.16 MMBtu/hr each) 5.54 4.65 0.31 0.03 0.42 0.42 0.42 Vacuum cleaning systems used exclusively for industrial, commercial, or residential housekeeping purposes (Req 3, Part C.II.E.3.ii) One (1) Hi -Vac dust collector 0.0 I 0.0 0.0 I 0.0 0.16 I 0.16 0.16 Each individual piece of fuel burning equipment that uses gaseous fuel, and that has a design rate less than or equal to ten million British thermal units per hour (10 MMBtu/hr), and that is used solely for heating buildings for personal comfort. (Reg 3, Part C.II.E.3.ggg) Space Heaters 8.76 7.36 0.48 0.05 0.67 0.67 0.67 Total (tpy) 19.44 15.82 I 3.58 0.19 I 1.64 1.61 I 1.61 Notes: 'These emission sources are exempt under Regulation 3, Part C.II.E.3.a and Regulation 3, Part C.II.E.3.k 2 These emission sources are exempt under Regulation 3, Part C.II.E.3.a and Regulation 3, Part C.II.E.3.xxx 123/4406 Page 45 of 50 Owens -Brockway Glass Container, Inc. Operating Permit No. 06OPWE289 Technical Review Document — Initial Operating Permit 3 The emissions shown for these emission points are a total of emissions from all the emission sources for the emission point Please note that the items with an asterisk (*) denote an insignificant source category based on the size of the activity, emission levels from the activity or the production rate of the activity. The owner or operator of individual emission points in insignificant activity source categories marked with an asterisk (*) must maintain sufficient record keeping verifying that the exemption applies. VI. Alternative Operating Scenarios No alternative operating scenarios were requested for this facility. VII. Permit Shield Owens -Brockway Glass Container submitted a list of requested Permit Shield citations with the Operating Permit application. The following requested citation was granted for the Permit Shield. • Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section VI.A requirements for Existing Sulfur Dioxide Emissions Regulations for Point 001 and 002. Point 001 and 002 are defined as new sources, they were constructed after August 11, 1977. The shield, however, does not protect the source from any violations that occurred prior to or at the time of permit issuance. In addition, the shield does not protect the source from any violations that occur as a result of any modifications or reconstruction on which construction commenced prior to permit issuance. 123/4406 Page 46 of 50 VIII. Facility -Wide Emission Details A. Controlled Criteria Pollutant Emissions (tons per year) Controlled Emissions SO2 Point 001 Facility ID Furnace A Description One (1) Custom Built Nat Gas Furnace NOx VOC CO PM PM10 PMzs 97.31 15.7 15.7 35.31 35.31 35.31 62.78 002 003 Furnace B Refiners One (1) Custom Built Nat Gas Furnace 97.31 15.7 15.7 35.31 0.35 35.31 0.35 35.31 0.35 62.78 Two (2) Custom Built Refiners 4.63 0.25 3.89 0.03 006 Annealing Lehrs Four (4) Bowman Nat Gas Annealing Lehrs 14.02 0.77 11.77 1.07 1.07 1-91 7.07 1-91 0.08 5.56 0.42 008 Forming Machines Five (5) Custom Built Forming Machines 0.07 1.95 1-07 24.33 009 HEST's Four (4) Hot End Surface Treatment 24.51 Systems 011 Diesel Backup Generator A One (1) Caterpillar 3412CDITA Diesel Fired CI Emergency Generator 3.71 3.71 0.03 0.03 0.3 0.3 J 004 0.04 I 0-04 0-04 012 Diesel Backu•p Generator B One (1) Caterpillar 3412CDITA Diesel Fired Cl Emergency Generator 0-04 0_04 0.42 015 Carton Printing Three (3) Carton Printing. Three (3) 12.73 Hot Glue. and (4) Cold End Spray 30.37 30,37 30-37 017 Mould Shop Mould Shop 2.25 2.25 2.25 010 Cooling Towers Two (2) Cooling Towers 12.48 12.48 12.48 019 BH DC B Three (3) Batch House Dust Collectors 3_94 3.94 3.94 1.81 020 BH DC's_A — Thirty -Three (33) Batch House Dust Collectors 1.81 1.81 021 Fugitive Dust Sources Fugitive Dust Sources: Cullet Storage Piles, Rail Car Unloading, Truck 38.32 Unloading, and Haul Roads 8.82 1.98 I 024 Warehouse Generator One (1) Caterpillar C9 Diesel Fired Cl Emergency Generator 1 31 0.03 0.12 0.02 0.02 0.02 025 ABLS Automatic Blank Lubrication System 0.24 0.32 [ 71.69 i 49.16 2.64 2.64 2.64 Total (toy) 222.31 188.29 136.37 129.53 [ 132.07 1 123/4406 Page 47 of 50 Owens -Brockway Glass Container, Inc. Operating Permit No, 06OPWE289 Technical Review Document — Initial Operating Permit B. Uncontrolled Criteria Pollutant Emissions (tons per year) Uncontrolled Emissions Point Facility ID Description NOx VOC CO PM PM10 PM2,5 502 001 002 Furnace A Furnace One (1) Custom Built Nat Gas Furnace 97.31 _ I One (1) Custom Built Nat Gas Furnace I 15.7 I 15.7 176.57 35.31 i 35.31 251.12 176.57 I I 251.12 003 Refiners Two (2) Custom Built Refiners 4 63 0.25 3.89 0 35 0.35 0.35 0.03 ""� 008 Annealing Lehrs Four (4) Bowman Nat Gas Annealing I Lehrs I '.."` ".,, I I 1.0, I '.o, I x.0 0.03 Forming Machines Five (5) Custom Built Forming Machines 0.07 1.95 1.07 24.33 1.91 0.04 �- 1.91 0.04 5.56 009 HEST's Four (4) Hot End Surface Treatment 24.51 Systems 1 0.3 0.04 011 Diesel Backup Generator A One (1) Caterpillar 3412CDITA Diesel Fired CI Emergency Generator 3.71 0.03 0.42 012 015 Diesel Backup Generator B One ( 1) Caterpillar 3412CDITA Diesel Fired Cl Emergency Generator 371 0.03 0.3 nnn gnn ggn 0.42 Carton Printing Three (3) Carton Printing, Three (3) 12.73 Hot Glue. and (4) Cold End Spray 30.37 30.37 30.37 017 Mould Shop Mould Shop 2.25 12.48 2.25 12.48 2.25 12.48 018 Coaling Towers Two (2) Cooling Towers 019 BH DC B Three (3) Batch House Dust Collectors ,..04 3.94 3.04 020 BH DC's A — — Thirty -Three (33) Batch House Dust Collectors _ 6.03 6.03 6.03 021 Fugitive Dust Sources Fugitive Dust Sources: Cullet Storage Piles, Rail Car Unloading, Truck Unloading, and Haul Roads I 0,03 7376 25.59 4.52 024 Warehouse One (1) Caterpillar C9 Diesel Fired CI Generator Emergency Generator 1.31 0.12 0.02 0-02 0.02 025 ABLS Automatic Blank Lubrication System 0.24 0.32 2.64 2.64 2.64 Total (toy) 222.31 I 71.69 49.16 510.45 157.36 136.29 588.75 123/4406 Page 48 of 50 Owens -Brockway Glass Container, Inc. Operating Permit No. 06OPWE289 Technical Review Document — Initial Operating Permit C. Controlled Non -Criteria Pollutant Emissions (lbs per year) Point Facility ID 001 002 003 006 008 009 011 012 015 017 018 019 020 021 024 025 Furnace A Furnace B Ref ners Annealing Lehrs Forming Machines HEST's 8.157.00 Diesel Backup Generator A Diesel Backup Generator B Carton Printing Mould Shop Cooling Towers BH DC B BH DC's A Fugitive Dust Sources Warehouse Generator ABLS Hydrochloric Acid' Sulfuric Acid2 Formaldehyde' Hexane' I Chromium' Glycol Ethers' 39237 50 37.70 904.30 39,237.50 37.70 907.30 3 40 83.40 I 5.30 504.58 56.90 f 10..900.00 I Total (Ib year) Total ((py) 8.157.00 4.08 78,475.00 I 84.10 39.24 0.04 2,396.58 56.90 0.03 10,900.00 1.20 5.45 Notes: ': These pollutants are classi led as Federal and State Reportable Hazardous Air Pollutants if emissions exceed 200 lbs per year. ': These pollutants are classified only as non -criteria reportable pollutants if emissions exceed 200 lbs pe year. They are not used in the calculation of Hazardous Air Pollutants at the facility. 123/4406 Page 49 of 50 Owens -Brockway Glass Container, Inc. Operating Permit No. 06OPWE289 Technical Review Document — Initial Operating Permit D. Uncontrolled Non -Criteria Pollutant Emissions (lbs per year) Point 001 002 003 006 Annealing Lehrs 5.30 008 Forming Machines 009 HEST's ,j 8,157.00 011 Diesel Backer Generator A 012 Diesel Backup Generator B 015 Carton Printing Facility ID Furnace A Furnace B Refiners Hydrochloric Acid' Sulfuric Acid' 39,237.50 39,237.50 FormaldehydeHexane' 37 70 904.30 37.70 907.30 3.40 63.40 Chromium' I Glycol Ethers' 504.58 56.90 10.900.00 017 Mould Shop 018 Cooling Towers 019 BH DC B 020 BH DC's A Fugitive Dust Sources 024 Warehouse Generator 025 ABLS Total (lbs/year) _ Total (tpy) 8,157.00 78,475.00 0.04 12 1.20 2,396.58 0 30 4.08 39.24 10.900.00 5.45 Notes: ': These pollutants are classified as Federal and State Reportable Hazardous Air Pollutants if emissions exceed 200 lbs per year. 2'. These pollutants are classified only as non -criteria reportable pollutants if emissions exceed 200 lbs pe year. They are not used in the calculation of Hazardous Air Pollutants at the facility. 123/4406 Page 50 of 50 COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DIVISION OPERATING PERMIT SUMMARY PERMIT NUMBER: 06OPWE289 AIRS ID #: 123/4406 APPLICANT: Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. REVIEW ENGINEER: Danielle Walker SOURCE DESCRIPTION Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. has applied for an Operating Permit for their facility located at 11133 Eastman Park Drive, Windsor, CO in Weld County. This facility is designed to manufacture glass containers under SIC 3221. This is achieved by using two (2) custom built glass melting furnaces, two (2) refiners, four (4) annealing lehrs, four (4) forming machines, four (4) hot end surface treatment (HEST) systems, three (3) backup diesel fired compression ignition generators, three (3) carton printing systems, three (3) hot glue systems, four (4) cold end spray systems, two (2) cooling towers, three (3) batch house dust collectors, thirty three (33) batch house dust collectors vented internally, one (1) automatic blank lubrication system, and fugitive emissions from the cullet storage piles, rail car unloading, truck unloading, and haul roads. This facility is located in an area classified as attainment for all pollutants except for ozone. It is classified as non - attainment for the 8 -hour ozone control area as defined in Colorado Regulation No. 7, Section II.A.1. This source is classified as a Non -Attainment New Source Review (NANSR) major stationary source and a minor stationary source with respect to Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) requirements. Wyoming is an affected state within 50 miles of this facility. Rocky Mountain National Park is a Federal Class I designated area is within 100 kilometers of the plant. This source is not subject to the Accidental Release provisions of section 112(r) of the Federal Clean Air Act. Point 001 and 002, the custom built natural gas glass melting furnaces are equipped with control devices and have pre -control emissions that exceed or are equivalent to the major source threshold. Therefore the Compliance Assurance Monitoring (CAM) requirements apply to Points 001 and 002. Since Points 001 and 002 are not defined as Large Pollutant Specific Emission Units as defined under 40 CFR Part 64, the applicant is not required to submit a CAM plant for these emission units until the operating permit is renewed. FACILITY EMISSION SUMMARY Pollutant Potential to Emit (tons/yr) NOx 221.9 CO 47.1 VOC 70.7 PM 187.0 Pk/lio 133.3 PMz5 126.4 SO2 131.2 Individual HAPs < 10.0 Total HAPs < 25.0 EMISSION SOURCES Point 001 and 002, Two (2) Glass Melting Furnaces — Each furnace is equipped with a dry scrubber to control sulfur dioxide emissions and an electrostatic precipitator to control particulate matter emissions. The furnaces are subject to the Colorado Regulation No. 1 opacity requirements, NOx, SO2, CO, VOC, PM, PM10, PM25 emission limitations, a glass production limitation, the Colorado Regulation No. 1 particulate matter and sulfur dioxide requirements, and 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart CC and Subpart A requirements. Point 003. Two (2) Refiners - Each glass melting furnace is equipped with a natural gas fired refiner. The refiners are subject to the Colorado Regulation No. 1 opacity requirements, NOx and CO emission limitations, natural gas consumption limitations, and the Colorado Regulation No. 1, particulate matter requirements. Point 006, Four (4) Annealing Lehrs - The annealing lehrs are natural gas fired kilns used to cool and temper the shaped glass. They are subject to the Colorado Regulation No. 1 opacity requirements, NOx and CO emission limitations, natural gas consumption limitations, and the Colorado Regulation No. 1, particulate matter requirements. Point 008, Four (4) Forming Machines - The forming machines shape the molten glass into containers. They are subject to the Colorado Regulation No. 1 opacity requirements, PM, SO2, and VOC emission limitations, mould lubricant oil consumption limitations, and the Colorado Regulation No. 1 particulate matter and sulfur dioxide requirements. Point 009. Five (5) Hot End Surface Treatment (HEST) Systems - The HEST systems treat the moulded glass. They are subject to a VOC emission limitation and a monobutyltin trichloride consumption limitation. Point 011 and 012, Two (2) Diesel Fired Compression Ignition Emergency Generators — The diesel fired emergency generators are subject to the Colorado Regulation No. 1 opacity requirements, a NOx emission limitation, diesel fuel consumption limitation, hours of operation limitation, and 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart ZZZZ. Point 015. Packing Operations — The packing operations are subject to the Colorado Regulation No. 1 opacity requirements, VOC, PM, PMm, and PM2,5 emission limitations, MSDS recordkeeping, and the Colorado Regulation No. 1 particulate matter requirements. Point 017. Mould Shop — The mould shop is equipped with one dust collector. The mould shop is subject to the Colorado Regulation No. 1 opacity requirements, PM, PM1o, PM25 emission limitations, and the Colorado Regulation No. 1 particulate matter requirements. Point 018. Cooling Towers — The cooling towers are subject to the Colorado Regulation No. 1 opacity requirement, PM, PM1o, PM25 emission limitations and a water circulation rate. Point 019 and 020, Batch House Operations, Thirty Six (36) Dust Collectors - The dust collectors control the particulate matter emissions from the unloading and conveying of glass raw materials. They are subject to the Colorado Regulation No. 1 opacity requirements, PM, PM10, and PM2.5 emission limitations, the Colorado Regulation No. 1 particulate matter requirements, and pressure drop inspections. Point 021. Fugitive Dust Emissions — The fugitive dust emissions are produced from the cutlet storage piles, rail car unloading, truck unloading, and haul roads. The fugitive dust emissions are subject to the Colorado Regulation No. 1 fugitive dust plan, PM, PM1o, and PM2.5 emission limitations and cullet storage pile, rail car unloading, and truck unloading limitations. Point 024, One (1) Diesel Fired Compression Ignition Emergency Generator - The diesel fired emergency generator is subject to the Colorado Regulation No. 1 opacity requirements, NOx limitation, diesel fuel consumption limitation, hours of operation limitation, 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart ZZZZ, 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart 1111, and the RACT requirements of Colorado Regulation No. 3, Part B, Section III.D.2.a and Colorado Regulation No. 7, Section II.C.2. Point 025, Automatic Blank Lubrication System — This system is subject to the Colorado Regulation No. 1 opacity requirements, PM, PM10, and PM2.5 emission limitations, and the Colorado Regulation No. 1 particulate matter requirements. INSIGNIFICANT ACTIVITIES A list of insignificant activities is included in the draft Operating Permit. ALTERNATIVE OPERATING SCENARIOS There has not been an alternative operating scenario included in the draft Operating Permit. rya OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS CONTAINERS North America August 9, 2006 Mr. Matt Burgett Colorado Department of Health APCD-SS-B1 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South Denver, CO 80246-1530 RE: Operating Permit Application Dear Mr. Burgett: Please find the enclosed original Operating Permit Application, plus three copies, for Owens -Brockway Glass Container, Inc. 11133 County Road 64'/4 Greeley, CO 80631 (ID# CO 1234406). The facility currently operates under Construction Permit # 03WE1151. APENs were originally submitted (attached) for several sources which are considered insignificant because their emissions are less than the threshold in Regulation 3 Part II.E.3.a. These sources are not included in the Operating Permit Application and are summarized below: AIRS Point Description AIRS Point Description 1 004 Alcove (4) 014 Bottle Coder' 005 Forehearth (4) 016 Degreasers/Delivery Equipment Coating 007 Belt Burner (8)' 010 Pre -Heat Mould Oven 017 Mould Shop 013 Diesel Fire Water Pump2 022 Cullet Crusher Equipment was not installed 2Equipment also insignificant under Regulation 3 Part II.E.3.xxx.(i) Emissions from all facility insignificant sources are not included in the Operating Permit Application and are estimated to be (in tons/year): PM 5.9 15.9 PM10 NOx SO2 VOC 22.4 1.2 5.4 CO 16.2 Pb 0 Packaging Solutions - Everywhere, Everyday 3600 Alameda Ave • Oakland, CA 94601 • Tel: 510 436 2000 • Fax: 510-436-2076 If you have any questions regarding this application, please call me at (510) 436-2107. Sincerely, _ter Darrin Gambelin Environmental Manager Cc: Dwayne Wendler Operating Permit Application Operating Permit Application FACILITY IDENTIFICATION Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE FORM 2000-100 Rev 06-95 1. Facility name and Name Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. mailing address Street or Route 11133 County Road 64 X City, State, Zip Code Greeley, Colorado 80631 2. Facility location Street Address 11133 County Road 64 (No P.O. Box) City,County, Zip Code Greeley, Colorado 80631 3. Parent corporation Name Owens - I 11 inoi s Street or Route One Seagate City, State, Zip Code Toledo, OH 43666 Country (if not U.S.) 4. Responsible Name official Title Telephone Dwayne Wandler Plant Manager (970) 674-3801 5. Permit contact person Name Title (If Different than 4) Telephone Darrin Gambelin Environmental Manager (510) 436-2107 6. Facility SIC code: 3221 7. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 8. Federal Tax I. D. Number: 22-278-4144 9. Primary activity of the operating establishment: Glass Container Manufacturing 10. Type of operating permit x New ❑ Modified ❑ Renewal 11. Is the facility located in a "nonattainment" area: fl Yes X No If "Yes", check the designated "nw-attainment" pollutant(s): ❑ Carbon Monoxide fl Ozone U PM10 U Other (specify) 12. List all (Federal and State) air pollution permits (including grandfathered units), plan approvals and exemptions issued to this facility. List the number, date and what unit/process is covered by each permit. For a Modified Operating Permit, do not complete this item. 03WE1151 May 19, 2004 Glass Container Manufacturing Operating Permit Application Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division FACILITY PLOT PLAN FORM 2000-101 Rev 06-95 Facility Name: Owens-Brockwjy Glass Container, Inc Facility Identification Code: CO1234406 The operating permit must be prepared and submitted m forms supplied by the Division. Use of this form is required for all operating permit applications. The Division will not consider or act upon your application unless each form used has been entirely completed. Completion of the information in the shaded area of this form is optional. Use "NA" where necessary to identify an information request that does not apply and is not in the optional shaded area. In order for a comprehensive air quality analysis to be accomplished, a facility plot plan MUST be included with the permit application. Drawings provided must fit on generic paper sizes of 8 1/2" X 11", 8 1/2" X 14" or 11" X 15", as appropriate to display the information being provided. Include the facility name and facility identification code on all sheets. For facilities with large areas, sketches of individual buildings, on separate drawings, may be needed to allow easy identification of stacks or vents. Insignificant activities do not need to be shown. x 1. A plant layout (plan view) including all buildings occupied by or located on the site of the facility and any outdoor process layout. 2. The maximum height of each building (excluding stack height). X 3. The location and coded designation of each stack. Please ensure these designations correspond to the appropriate stacks listed on the other permit forms in this application. The drawings need not be to scale if pertinent dimensions are annotated, including positional distances of structures, outdoor processes and free standing stacks to each other and the property boundaries. 4. The location of property boundary lines. x 5. Identify direction "North" on all submittals. Are there any outdoor storage piles on the facility site with air pollution emissions that need to be reported? Yes X No If "Yes", what is the material in the storage pile(s)? Cullet storage piles emissions are insignificant (< 2 tons PM/year) Are there any unpaved roads or unpaved parking lots on the facility site? ❑ Yes X No List the name(s) of any neighboring state(s) within a 50 mile radius of your facility: FACILITY PLOT PLAN -- Form 2000-101 AIR POLLUTION CONTROL OPERATING PERMIT APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS NOTE: The operating permit must be prepared and submitted on forms supplied by the Division. Use of this form is required for all operating permits. The Division will not consider or act upon your application unless each form used has been entirely completed. Completion of the information in the shaded area of this form is optional. Use "NA" where necessary to identify an information request that does not apply and is not in the optional shaded area. To facilitate the Division's analysis, attach a sketch of the facility layout. The sketch will be used to identify the location of the various emissions at the facility. The sketch should show the positional relationships of any buildings, outdoor processes and the property boundaries. The sketch does not need to be exactly to scale if pertinent dimensions are annotated. For a facility with a large area, a single drawing of the entire facility may not provide much detail. Submit one drawing of the entire site and additional separate drawings, as necessary, to show portions of the facility grounds, buildings or process stacks and vents in more readable detail. DO NOT SUBMIT BLUEPRINT SIZE DRAWINGS. See Attached Drawing Operating Permit Application Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SOURCE AND SITE DESCRIPTIONS FORM 2000-102 Rev 06-95 Facility Name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container, lox Facility Identification Code: CO 1234406 The operating permit must be prepared and submitted m forms supplied by the Division. Use of this form is required for all operating permit applications. The Division will not consider or act upon your application unless each form used has been entirely completed. Completion of the information in the shaded area of this form is optional. Use "NA" where necessary to identify an information request that does not apply and is not in the optional shaded area. 1. Briefly describe the existing Unit(s) to be permitted. Attach copies of Form 2000-700 as needed to provide the information. Process flowsheets or line diagrams showing major features and locations of air pollution control equipment can be most effective in showing the location and relationships of the units. Providing mass flowrates/balances at critical points on the diagrams is very helpful when developing an understanding of the processes involved. The facility is a manufacturer of glass containers for various food and beverage industries. Major raw materials (sand, soda ash, limestone) are received by railcar or truck and conveyed to storage silos. Gullet (recycled glass) is crushed and conveyed to storage silos. Minor ingredients are received in various forms and stored in the batch house. The raw materials are weighed, combined, mixed, and conveyed to the furnaces. Molten glass is cut into gobs and fall into the forming machines where the glass is shaped into containers. The molded glass is treated by a HEST process where tin is applied. The containers are cooled and tempered in annealing lehrs before they are inspected and packed for shipment. (See Attached Process Diagram). 2. Site Location and Description (Include instructions needed to drive to remote sites not identifed by street addresses) The Facility is located at 11133 County Road 64 %,Greely, Colorado. The facility consists of approximately 100 acres. 3. Safety Equipment Identify safety equipment required for performing an inspection of the facility: Protection X Hard Hat x Safety shoes x Other, specify Safety Glasses Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Process Flow Diagram Bottle Coding Area ra O 2 Co 4- _ LL od c O C a N C ~ C t C LL C uig a6ejoIS 9oleg 4— C (7 C Q N g 2 to • E N j (7 LL m C m N8 E N l LL 0 m LLry E E LL Cullet Crushin 41- 4- (.0 O N fa; d n a T E 3 W 0 9 a 0 o a 0 LL U a O L CO D 0 4- 4- O Operating Permit Application Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SOURCE DESCRIPTION - APENS FORM 2000-102A Rev 06-95 Facility Name: Owens Brockway Glass Container Inc_ Facility Identification Code: CO 1234406 NOTE: Each new or updated Air Pollutant Emission Notice (APEN) submitted must be accompanied by payment of $100 per APEN. 1. For each emission unit enclose a copy of the most current complete Air Pollutant Emission Notice (APEN) on file with Division. If the most current APEN was not completely and correctly filled out, a revised APEN is required. List an APEN mber, date, and a brief description of the unit/process covered by the APEN. (No filing fees are needed for these copies) All current APEN are included 2. No APEN exists for an emission unit. List the new APEN and the appropriate descriptive information here. Submit APEN wit h a construction permit application. w APEN and permit application submitted No new APEN are included ❑ with this application OR U under separate cover to Construction Permits Section 3. A revised APEN was prepared and enclosed for an emission unit. List the APEN and the appropriate descriptive ormation here. A revised APEN is needed where a significant increase in emissions has occurred, or is planned; or a major dification of the unit has occurred or is planned; or the existing information needs correction or completion. A nstruction permit application may need to be submitted. vised APEN submitted as part of this application: Dyes X No ❑ Filing Fee Enclosed New permit application enclosed: Cl Yes ❑ No Permit modification application enclosed: ❑ Yes ❑ No NOTE: Use additional copies of Form 2000-700 as needed to provide the above information. Operating Permit Application SOURCE DESCRIPTION - INSIGNIFICANT ACTIVITIES Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division FORM 2000-102B Rev 06-95 Facility Name: Owens Brockway Glass Container Inc Facility Identification Code: CO1234406 NOTE: The operating permit must be prepared and submitted on forms supplied by the Division. This is a supplemental form for use only when necessary to provide complete information in the operating permit application.The Division wi II not consider or act upon your application unless each form used has been entirely completed. rtain categories of sources and activities are considered to be insignificant contributors to air pollution and are listed below. source solely comprised of one or more of these activities is not required to obtain an operating permit pursuant to gulation 3, unless the source's emissions trigger the major source threshold as defined in Part A, Section l.B.58 of gulation 3. For the facility, mark all insignificant existing or proposed air pollution emission units, operations, and activities ed below. Cl (a) noncommercial (in-house) experimental and analytical laboratory equipment which is bench scale in nature including quality control/quality assurance laboratories, process support laboratories, environmental laboratories supporting a manufacturing or industrial facility, and research and development laboratories. (b) research and development activities which are of a small pilot scale and which process less than 10,000 pounds of test material per year. (c) small pilot scale research and development projects less than six months in duration with controlled actual emissions less than 500 pounds of any criteria pollutant or 1O pounds of any non -criteria reportable pollutant. x Disturbance of surface areas for purposes of land development, which do not exceed 25 contiguous acres and which do not exceed six months in duration. (This does not include mining operations or disturbance of contaminated soil). x Each individual piece of fuel burning equipment, other than smokehouse generators and internal combustion engines, which uses gaseous fuel, and which has a design rate less than or equal to 5 million Btu per hour. (See definition of fuel burning equipment, Common Provisions Regulation). El Petroleum industry flares, not associated with refineries, combusting natural gas containing no H2S except in trace (less than 500 ppmw) amounts, approved by the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission and having uncontrolled emissions of any pollutant of less than five tons per year. x Chemical storage tanks or containers that hold less than 500 gallons, and which have a daily throughput less than 25 gallons. x Landscaping and site housekeeping devices equal to or less than 10 H.P. in size (lawnmowers, trimmers, snow blowers, etc.). El Crude oil or condensate loading truck equipment at crude oil production sites where the loading rate does not exceed 10,00O gallons per day averaged over any 30 day period. x Chemical storage areas where chemicals are stored in closed containers, and where total storage capacity does not exceed 5000 gallons. This exemption applies solely to storage of such chemicals. This exemption does not apply to transfer of chemicals from, to, or between such containers. El Oil production wastewater (produced water tanks), containing less than 1% by volume crude oil, except for commercial facilities which accept oil production wastewater for processing. (Continues on other side) x Storage of butane, propane, or liquified petroleum gas in a vessel with a capacity of less than 60,000 gallons, provided the requirements of Regulation No. 7, Section IV are met, where applicable. x Storage tanks of capacity < 40,000 gallons of lubricating oils. x Venting of compressed natural gas, butane or propane gas cylinders, with a capacity of 1 gallon or less. x Fuel storage and dispensing equipment in ozone attainment areas operated solely for company -owned vehicles where the daily fuel throughput is no more than 400 gallons per day, averaged over a 30 day period. 7 Crude oil or condensate storage tanks with a capacity of 40,000 gallons or less. Storage tanks meeting all of the following criteria: (i) annual throughput is less than 400,000 gallons; and (ii) the liquid stored is one of the following: (A) diesel fuels 1-D, 2-D, or 4-D; (B) fuel oils #1 through #6; (C) gas turbine fuels 1-GT through 4-GT; (D) an oil/water mixture with a vapor pressure lower than that of diesel fuel (Reid vapor pressure of .025 PSIA). x Each individual piece of fuel burning equipment which uses gaseous fuel, and which has a design rate less than or equal to 10 million Btu per hour, and which is used solely for heating buildings for personal comfort. n Stationary Internal Combustion Engines which: 0) power portable drilling rigs; or (ii) are emergency power generators which operate no more than 250 hours per year; or (iiilhave actual emissions less than five tons per year or rated horsepower of less than 50. ❑ Surface mining activities which mine 70,000 tons or fewer of product material per year. A fugitive dust control plan is required for such sources. Crushers, screens and other processing equipment activities are not included in this exemption. x Air pollution emission units, operations or activities with emissions less than the appropriate de minimis reporting level. NOTE: Material Data Safety Sheets (MSDS) do not have to be submitted for any insignificant activities. USE FORM 2000-700 TO PROVIDE AN ITEMIZED LIST OF THE SOURCES OR ACTIVITIES BEING IDENTIFIED AS INSIGNIFICANT ACTIVITIES. DO NOT ITEMIZE INDIVIDUAL PIECES OF LANDSCAPING EQUIPMENT. THE LIST IS NEEDED TO ACCURATELY ACCOUNT FOR ALL ACTIVITIES AT THE FACILITY Operating Permit Application Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FORM 2000-700 09-94 SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 3. This form supplements Form 2000 - 102 B for Emission Unit (e.g. B001, P001, etc.) Listing of Insignificant Sources 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 Additional Information, Diagrams -Disturbance of surface areas for purposes of land development, which do not exceed 25 contiguous acres and which do not exceed six months in duration - Fuel burning equipment less than or equal to 5mmbtu/hr. Includes: alcoves, forehearths, pre -heat mold ovens, space heaters, water heaters - Chemical storage tanks or containers that hold less than 500 gallons, and which have a daily throughput less than 25 gallons - Landscaping and site housekeeping devices equal to or less than 10 H.P. in size (lawnmowers, trimmers, snow blowers, etc.) - Storage of butane, propane, or liquified petroleum gas in a vessel with a capacity of less than 60,000 gallons - Storage tanks of capacity < 40,000 gallons of lubricating oils, - Storage tanks meeting all of the following criteria: (i)annual throughput is less than 400,000 gallons; and (ii)the liquid stored is one of the following: (A) diesel fuels 1-D, 2-D, or 4-D; (B) fuel oils #1 through #6; (C) gas turbine fuels 1-GT through 4-GT; (D) an oil/water mixture with a vapor pressure lower than that of diesel fuel (Reid vapor pressure of .025 PSIA). -Each individual piece of fuel burning equipment which uses gaseous fuel, and which has a design rate less than or equal to 10 million Htu per hour, and which is used solely for heating buildings for personal comfort. -Fire Water Diesel Pumps (< 175 Hp and operate less than 1,450 hrs year. -Air pollution emission units, operations or activities with emissions less than the appropriate de minimis reporting level, includes: cold - end spray, delivery equipment coating, parts cleaners, mould shop, hi - vac dust collector, cullet crusher, cullet storage piles, scrubber reagent unloading and storage Operating Permit Application Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division STACK IDENTIFICATION FORM 2000-200 Rev 06-95 SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container, Inc 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: S001 3a. Construction Permit Number: 03WE1151 4. Exhausting Unit(s), use Unit identification code from appropriate Form(s) 2000-300, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307 2000-300_P001 2O00-304 2000-301 2000-305 2000-302 2000-303 2000-306 2000-307 5. Stack identified on the plot plan required on Form 2000-101 X 6. Indicate by checking: x This stack has an actual exhaust point. The parameters are entered in Items 7-13. ❑ This stack serves to identify fugitive emissions. Skip items 7-13. Go to next form. ❑ When stack height Good Engineering Practice (GEP) exceeds 65 meters (Colorado Air Quality Reg 3.A.VIII.D) data entry is required for Item 7. Discharge height above ground level: 170 (feet) 8. Inside dimensions at outlet (check one and complete): 1 Circular (feet) ; Rectangular length (feet) width (feet) 9. Exhaust flow rate: Normal (ACFM) Velocity (FPS) : Calculated C' Stack Test Maximum (ACFM) 10. Exhaust gas temperature (normal): (EF) I 1 . Does process modify ambient air moisture content? Yes T. No If "Yes", exhaust gas moisture content: Norma! percent Maximum_ percent 12. Exhaust gas discharge direction: a Up ] Down Horizontal 13. Is this stack equipped with a rainhat or any obstruction to the free flow of the exhaust gases from the stack? . Yes H No *****Complete the appropriate Air Permit Application Forms(s) 2000-300, 301, 302, 303, 304, ***** 305, 306, or 307 for each Unit exhausting through this stack. Operating Permit Application Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division STACK IDENTIFICATION FORM 2000-200 Rev 06-95 SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container, Inc 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: S002 3a. Construction Permit Number: 03WE1151 4. Exhausting Unit(s), use Unit identification code from appropriate Form(s) 2000-300, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307 2000-300_P002 2000-304 2000-301 2000-305 2000-302 2000-303 2000-306 2000-307 5. Stack identified on the plot plan required on Form 2000-101 X 6. Indicate by checking: X This stack has an actual exhaust point. The parameters are entered in Items 7-13. ❑ This stack serves to identify fugitive emissions. Skip items 7-13. Go to next form. ❑ When stack height Good Engineering Practice (GEP) exceeds 65 meters (Colorado Air Quality Reg 3.A.VIII,D) data entry is required for Item 7. 7. Discharge height above ground level: 170 (feet) 8. Inside dimensions at outlet (check one and complete): 1 Circular (feet) U Rectangular length (feet) width (feet) 9. Exhaust flow rate: Normal (ACFM) Velocity (FPS) E Calculated ❑ Stack Test Maximum (ACFM) 10. Exhaust gas temperature (normal): (EF) 11. Does process modify ambient air moisture content? U Yes U No If "Yes", exhaust gas moisture content: Normal percent Maximum percent 12. Exhaust gas discharge direction: U Up ❑ Down ❑ Horizontal 13. Is this stack equipped with a rainhat or any obstruction to the free flow of the exhaust gases from the stack? 0 Yes U No *****Complete the appropriate Air Permit Application Fonns(s) 2000-300, 301, 302, 303, 304, ***** 305, 306, or 307 for each Unit exhausting through this stack. Operating Permit Application Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division STACK IDENTIFICATION FORM 2000-200 Rev 06-95 SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: S003 3a. Construction Permit Number: 03WE1151 4. Exhausting Unit(s), use Unit identification code from appropriate Form(s) 2000-300, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307 2O00-300 2000-301 2000-302 P011 2000-303 2O00-304 2000-305 2000-306 2000-307 5. Stack identified on the plot plan required on Form 2000-101 x 6. Indicate by checking: X This stack has an actual exhaust point. The parameters are entered in Items 7-13. ❑ This stack serves to identify fugitive emissions. Skip items 7-13. Go to next form. ❑ When stack height Good Engineering Practice (GEP) exceeds 65 meters (Colorado Air Quality Reg 3.A.VIII.D) data entry is required for Item 7. 7. Discharge height above ground level: (feet) 8. Inside dimensions at outlet (check one and complete): Li Circular (feet) Rectangular length (feet) width (feet) 9. Exhaust flow rate: Normal (ACFM) Velocity (FPS) ❑ Calculated ❑ Stack Test Maximum (ACFM) 1O. Exhaust gas temperature (normal): (EF) 11. Does process modify ambient air moisture content? ❑ Yes ❑ No If "Yes", exhaust gas moisture content: Normal percent Maximum percent 12. Exhaust gas discharge direction: E Up Li Down ❑ Horizontal 13. Is this stack equipped with a rainhat or any obstruction to the free flow of the exhaust gases from the stack? O Yes ❑ No *****Complete the appropriate Air Permit Application Forms(s) 2000-300, 301, 302, 303, 304, ***** 305, 306, or 307 for each Unit exhausting through this stack. Operating Permit Application Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division STACK IDENTIFICATION FORM 2000-200 Rev 06-95 SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: S004 3a. Construction Permit Number: 03WE1151 4. Exhausting Unit(s), use Unit identification code from appropriate Form(s) 2000-300, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307 2000-300 2000-301 2000-304 2000-305 2000-302 P012 2000-303 2000-306 2000-307 5. Stack identified on the plot plan required on Form 2000-101 x 6. Indicate by checking: X This stack has an actual exhaust point. The parameters are entered in Items 7-13. ❑ This stack serves to identify fugitive emissions. Skip items 7-13. Go to next form. U When stack height Good Engineering Practice (CEP) exceeds 65 meters (Colorado Air Quality Reg 3.A.VIII.D) data entry is required for Item 7. 7. Discharge height above ground level: (feet) S. Inside dimensions at outlet (check one and complete): ! Circular _ (feel) ❑ Rectangular length (feet) width (feet) 9. Exhaust flow rate: Normal (ACFM) Velocity (FPS) J Calculated ❑ Stack Test Maximum (ACFM) 10. Exhaust gas temperature (normal): (EF) 11. Does process modify ambient air moisture content? ❑ Yes ❑ No If "Yes", exhaust gas moisture content: Normal percent Maximum percent 12. Exhaust gas discharge direction: ❑ Up G Down L Horizontal 13. Is this stack equipped with a rainhat or any obstruction to the free flow of the exhaust gases from the stack? El Yes ❑ No *****Complete the appropriate Air Permit Application Forms(s) 2000-300, 301, 302, 303, 304, ***** 305, 306, or 307 for each Unit exhausting through this stack. Operating Permit Application BOILER OR FURNACE OPERATION Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE FORM 2000-300 09-94 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container, Inc 3. Stack identification code: S001 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 4. Unit code: P001 5. Unit description: Glass Melting Furnace A equipped with oxy-fuel burners to reduce NOx emissions, an ESP to reduce particulate emissions, and a dry scrubber to reduce SO2 emissions. 6. Seasonal Fuel Usage(%) Dec -Feb: 25 Mar -May: Jun -Aug: 25 Sep -Nov: 25 25 7. Normal Operation Hours/Day: 24 Days/Wee Hours/Year: 8760 of Unit k: 7 8. Space Heat(%) 0 9. Indicate the boiler/furnace control techrology status. ❑ Uncontrolled x Controlled If the boiler/furnace is controlled, enter the control device number(s) from the appropriate forms: 2000-400 C102 2000-401 2000-402 2000-403 2000-404 2000-405 2000-406 C101 2000-407 10. Furnace type: Glass Melting 11. Max continuous rating(mniBTU/hr): 57.35 12. Manufacturer: Owner Design and Built 13. Model & Serial #: NA 14. Date first placed in service: 9/11/2005 Date of last modification: NA 15. Fuels and firing conditions: Primary fuel Backup fuel #1 Backup fuel #2 Fuel name Natural Gas Higher heating value (with units) 1000 btu/scf Maximum sulfur content (Wt.%) 0.02 gr/scf Maximum ash content (Wt. %) Negligib le Excess Combustion Air OR %Oz (Circle choice) Moisture content (as fired) (%) Maximum hourly fuel usage (units/hr.) 57.35 mmbtu/hr Actual annual fuel usage for ***** For this emissions unit, identify the method of compliance demonstratim by completing Form 2000-500, ***** DESCRIPTION OF METHODS USED FOR DETERMINING COMPLIANCE. Attach Form 2000-500 and its attachment(s) to this form. ***** Please complete the Air Pollution Control Permit Application Forms 2000-600 and 2000-601 for this Unit. * * * * * Operating Permit Application BOILER OR FURNACE OPERATION Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE FORM 2000-300 09-94 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container, Inc 3. Stack identification code: S002 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 4. Unit code: P002 5. Unit description: Glass Melting Furnace B equipped with oxy-fuel burners to reduce NOx emissions, an ESP to reduce particulate emissions, and a dry scrubber to reduce SO2 emissions. 6. Seasonal Fuel Usage(%) Dec -Feb: 25 Mar -May: Jun -Aug: 25 Sep -Nov: 25 25 7. Normal Operation Hours/Day: 24 Days/Wee Hours/Year: 8760 of Unit k: 7 8. Space Heat(%) 0 9. Indicate the boiler/furnace control technology status. fl Uncontrolled x Controlled If the boiler/furnace is controlled, enter the control device number(s) from the appropriate forms: 2000-400 C202 2000-401 2000-402 2000-403 2000-404 2000-405 2000-406 C201 2000-407 10. Furnace type: Glass Melting 11. Max continuous rating(mtnBTU/hr): 57.35 12. Manufacturer: Owner Design and Built 13. Model & Serial k: NA 14. Date first placed in service: 8/11/2005 Date of last modification: NA 15. Fuels and firing conditions: Primary fuel Backup fuel #1 Backup fuel #2 Fuel name Natural Gas Higher heating value (with units) 1000 btu/scf Maximum sulfur content (Wt.%) 0.02 gr/scf Maximum ash content (Wt. %) Negligib le Excess Combustion Air OR %O2 (Circle choice) Moisture content (as fired) (%) Maximum hourly fuel usage (units/hr.) 57.3S mmbtu/hr Actual annual fuel usage for 1/1/2006 - 6/30/2006 ***** For this emissions unit, identify the method of compliance demonstratim by completing Form 2000-500, ***** DESCRIPTION OF METHODS USED FOR DETERMINING COMPLIANCE. Attach Form 2000-500 and its attachment(s) to this form. ***** Please complete the Air Pollution Control Permit Application Forms 2000-600 and 2000-601 for this Unit. ***** Operating Permit Application BOILER OR FURNACE OPERATION Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE FORM 2000-300 09-94 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container, Inc 3. Stack identification code: NA 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 4. Unit code: P003 5. Unit description: Two refiners connected to Glass Melting Furnaces (P001 and P002). Glass which has been melted in the furnace flows to the refiner where it is heat conditioned. 6. Seasonal Fuel Usage(%) Dec -Feb: 25 Mar -May: Jun -Aug: 25 Sep -Nov: 25 25 7. Normal Operation Hours/Day: 24 Days/Wee Hours/Year: 8760 of Unit k: 7 8. Space Heat(%) 0 9. Indicate the boiler/furnace control techrology status. X Uncontrolled n Controlled If the boiler/furnace is controlled, enter the control device number(s) from the appropriate forms: 2000-400 2000-401 2000-402 2000-403 2000-404 2000-405 2000-406 2000-407 10. Furnace type: glass conditioning 11. Max continuous rating(mmBTU/hr): 10.58 (combined) 13. Model & Serial #: NA 12. Manufacturer: Owner Design and Built 14. Date first placed in service: 8/11/2005 Date of last modification: NA 15. Fuels and firing conditions: Primary fuel Backup fuel #1 Backup fuel #2 Fuel name Natural Gas Higher heating value (with units) 1000 btu/scf Maximum sulfur content (Wt.%) 0.02 gr/scf Maximum ash content (Wt. %) Negligib le Excess Combustion Air OR %O2 (Circle choice) Moisture content (as fired) (%) Maximum hourly fuel usage (units/hr.) 10.58 mmbtu/hr Actual annual fuel usage for ***** ***** For this emissions unit, identify the method of compliance demonstratim by completing Form 2000-500, DESCRIPTION OF METHODS USED FOR DETERMINING COMPLIANCE. Attach Form 2000-500 and its attachment(s) to this form. ***** Please complete the Air Pollution Control Permit Application Forms 2000-600 and 2000-601 for this Unit. * * * * * Operating Permit Application INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE OPERATION Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE FORM 2000-302 Rev 06-95 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Containers Inc. 3. Stack identification code: S003 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 4. Engine (Unit) code: P011 4a. Date first placed in service: 8/11/2005 Date last modified: NA 5. Engine use: Generator 6. Engine Features: 2 -Cycle ❑ 4 -Cycle ❑ Standard rich burn Air/fuel ratio controller Low-NOx design 7. Emission controls: X No Non -Selective catalytic reduction Selective catalytic reduction Oxidation catalyst 8. Manufacturer: Caterpillar 10. Max Fuel Desilm Rate: 12. Heat Rate: Spark -ignition ❑ u Diesel X Standard lean burn ❑ Turbocharger ❑ Other(Describe): ❑ Yes- Attach control device form ❑ Three-way catalyst ❑ ❑ Ammonia injected ❑ ❑ Other: 9. Model No: 3412CDITA S/N: 3FZ08453 5.58 mniBTU/hr 11. Horsepower 13. Operating Temp: Min. 0 Max. 120 Max Design: 823 Site: 823 6780 BTU/HP-hr 14. Fuels: Fuel Type: Heating Value Sulfur Content Ash Content, Moisture Content Primary Fuel Diesel Backup Fuel #1 BTU/SCF (Wt. %) (Wt. %) (%) 137,000 0.5 Neg. <.1 Maximum Hourly Consumption (F13,gal) Maximum Yearly Consumption (Ft3,gal) NOTE: Data entry below is NOT OPTIONAL if parametric monitoring is used for compliance demonstration 40.7 gal 20,350 gal 15. Operational Parameters Low High REMARKS Ignition Timing (degrees) Speed (RPM) Intake Air Temp. (EF) Air and Fuel Manifold Pressure Exhaust Temperature (EF) Exhaust Oxygen (%) Waste Gate Position Fuel Regulator Setting ***** Identify, the method of compliance demonstration by completing Form 2000-500, ***** DESCRIPTION OF METHODS USED FOR DETERMINING COMPLIANCE. Attach Form 2000-500 to this form. ***** Please complete the Air Pollution Control Permit Application Forms 2000-600 and 2000-601 for this Unit. ***** Operating Permit Application INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE OPERATION Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE FORM 2000-302 Rev 06-95 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Containers Inc. 3. Stack identification code: S004 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 4. Engine (Unit) code: P012 4a. Date first placed in service: 8/11/2005 Date last modified: NA 5. Engine use: Generator 6. Engine Features: 2 -Cycle ❑ 4 -Cycle 7 Spark -ignition ❑ Diesel X Standard rich burn n Standard lean burn t Air/fuel ratio controller ❑ Turbocharger ii Low-NOx design U Other(Describe): 7. Emission controls: X No ❑ Yes- Attach control device form Non -Selective catalytic reduction i Selective catalytic reduction Oxidation catalyst t i Three-way catalyst n Ammonia injected ❑ Other: 8. Manufacturer: Caterpillar 1O. Max Fuel Design Rate: 12. Heat Rate: 9. Model No: 3412CDITA S/N: 3FZ08451 5.58 mmBTU/hr 11. Horsepower 13. Operating Temp: Min. 0 Max. 120 Max Design: 823 Site: 823 6780 BTU/HP-hr 14. Fuels: Fuel Type: Heating Value BTU/SCF Sulfur Content (Wt. %) Ash Content, (Wt. %) Moisture Content (%) Maximum Hourly Consumption (Ft',gal) Maximum Yearly Consumption (Ft',gal) NOTE: Data entry below is NOT OPTIONAL if parametric monitoring is used for compliance demonstration Primary Fuel Diesel Backup Fuel #1 137,000 0.5 Neg. <.1 40.7 gal 20,350 gal 15. Operational Parameters Low High REMARKS Ignition Timing (degrees) Speed (RPM) Intake Air Temp. (EF) Air and Fuel Manifold Pressure Exhaust Temperature (EF) Exhaust Oxygen (%) Waste Gate Position Fuel Regulator Setting Identify, the method of compliance demonstration by completing Form 2000-500, ***** DESCRIPTION OF METHODS USED FOR DETERMINING COMPLIANCE. Attach Form 2000-500 to this form. ***** Please complete the Air Pollution Control Permit Application Forms 2000-600 and 2000-601 for this Unit. ***** Operating Permit Application Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE PRINTING OPERATIONS FORM 2000-304 Rev 06-95 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. 3. Stack identification code: NA 2. Facility identification code: CO1234406 4. Process (Unit) code: P015 5. Unit description (include serial number): Carton Printing 6. Indicate the control technology status. X Uncontrolled ❑ Controlled If the process is controlled, enter the control device mmber(s) from the appropriate foim(s): 2O00-400 2000-401 2O00-404 2000-405 2000-402 2000-403 2000-406 2000-407 7. Operation type: a Flexographic ❑ Web -offset ❑ Web -offset (non-heatset) ❑ Packaging Rotogravure ❑ Publication Rotogravure El Screen printing X Other (specify) Ink Jet 8. Date first placed in service: 8/11/2005 Date of last modification: NA 9. Normal operating schedule: 24 hrs./day 7 8760 days/wk. hours/yr. 1O. Oven curing (complete if applicable): NA Number of ovens Specify oven fuels Total maximum energy input to each oven: mm BTU/Hr. Total fuel usage for 19 million cubic feet 11. Describe all of the inks' and solvents' composition (as applied) that are used by this unit. The shaded areas are optional for data entry; however, if NSPS or Regulation 7 requirements apply to the unit, the applicable information must be provided. Name of ink a Maximum usage b Actual usage 19 c. Solids % d. VOC % e. Water % f. Exempt Solvent % g. Ink Density h. VOC less Hr0 i. gal/hr gal/yr gal/yr WI WI W't Wt lbs/gal or lbs lbs/gal SI60 Water Based Ink Jet Ink 2400 7.1 NA 0.59 List the thinning solvents used with the inks identified above. Clean-up solvents P -Solvent 120 2.0 Other (specify) ***** For this emissions unit, identify the method of compliance demonstration by completing Form 2000-500, ***** DESCRIPTION OF METHODS USED FOR DETERMINING COMPLIANCE. Attach Form 2000-500 and its attachment(s) to this form. ***** Please complete the Air Pollution Control Permit Application Forms 2000-600 and 2000-601 for this Unit, ***** Operating Permit Application Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE MISCELLANEOUS PROCESSES FORM 2000-306 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 3. Stack identification code: NA 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 4. Process (Unit) code: P006 5. Unit description: Four Annealing Lehrs 6. Indicate the control technology status. X Uncontrolled ❑ Controlled If the process is controlled, enter the control device code(s) from the appropriate form(s): 2000-400 2000-401 2000-402 2000-403 2000-404 2000-405 2000-406 2000-407 7. Actual annual process rates for 19 8. Date first placed in service: 8/11/2005 Date of last modification: NA 9. Normal operating schedule: 24 hrs./day 7 days/wk. 8760 hours/yr. 10. Describe this process (please attach a flow diagram of the process). Moulded glass containers are annealed in the four lehrs. Natural gas burners provide the heat for the annealing process 11. List the types and amounts of raw materials used in this process: Attached? X Material Storage/material handling process Actual Units usage Maximum Units usage NA NA NA NA Clean-up solvents Other (specify) 12. List the types and amounts of finished products: Material Storage/material handling process Actual Units amount produced - Maximum Units amount produced NA NA NA NA 13. Process fuel usage: Type of fuel Maximum heat input to process million BTU/hr. Actual Units usage Maximum Units usage Natural Gas 32.0 (combined) 32.0 Mmbtu/ hr 14. Describe any fugitive emissions associated with this process, such as outdoor storage piles, unpaved roads, open conveyors, etc.: NA ***** For this emissions unit, identify the method(s) of compliance demonstration by completing Form 2000-500,***** DESCRIPTION OF METHODS USED FOR DETERMINING COMPLIANCE. Attach Form 2000- 500 and its attachment(s) to this form. Rev 06-95 ***** Please complete the Air Pollution Control Permit Application Forms 2000-600 and 2000-601 for this Unit. ***** Operating Permit Application Colorado Department of Public Health and Enviromnent Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE MISCELLANEOUS PROCESSES FORM 2000-306 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 3. Stack identification code: NA 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 4. Process (Unit) code: P008 5. Unit description: Four Glass Forming Machines 6. Indicate the control technology status. X Uncontrolled ❑ Controlled If the process is controlled, enter the control device code(s) from the appropriate form(s): 2000-400 2000-401 2000-402 2000-403 2000-404 2000-405 2000-406 2000-407 7. Actual annual process rates for 19 8. Date first placed in servit: 8/11/2005 Date of last modification: NA 9. Normal operating schedule: 24 hrs./day 7 days/wk. 8760 hours/yr. 10. Describe this process (please attach a flow diagram of the process). Glass gobs from the forehearths are loaded into moulds to form containers. The moulds are periodically swathed with mould lubricant. 11. List the types and amounts of raw materials used in this process: Attached? x Material Storage/material handling process Actual Units usage Maximum Units usage Mould Lubricant Material is stored in totes or drums and applied manually with a swab 55.60 Tons/ year Clean-up solvents Other (specify) 12. List the types and amounts of finished products: Material Storage/material handling process Actual Units amount produced Maximum Units amount produced NA NA NA NA 13. Process fuel usage: Type of fuel Maximum heat input to process million BTU/br. Actual Units usage Maximum Units usage NA NA NA NA 14. Describe any fugitive emissions associated with this process, such as outdoor storage piles, unpaved roads, open conveyors, etc.: Emissions from source are fugitive ***** For this emissions unit, identify the method(s) of compliance demonstration by completing Form 2000-500, ***** DESCRIPTION OF METHODS USED FOR DETERMINING COMPLIANCE. Attach Form 2000- 500 and its attachment(s) to this form. Rev 06-95 ***** Please complete the Air Pollution Control Permit Application Forms 2000-600 and 2000-601 for this Unit. ***** Operating Permit Application Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE MISCELLANEOUS PROCESSES FORM 2000-306 Rev 06-95 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 3. Stack identification code: NA 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 4. Process (Unit) code: P009 5. Unit description: Hot End Surface Treatment (HEST) 6. Indicate the control technology status. X Uncontrolled E Controlled If the process is controlled, enter the control device code(s from the appropriate form(s): 2000-400 2000-401 2000-402 2000-403 2000-404 2000-405 2000-406 2000-407 7. Actual annual process rates for 19 8. Date first placed in service: 8/11/2005 Date of last modification: NA 9. Normal operating schedule: 24 hrs./day 7 days/wk. 8760 hours/yr. 10. Describe this process (please attach a flow diagram of the process). Monobutyltin Trichloride is applied to the hot containers after they leave the forming machines 11. List the types and amounts of raw materials used in this process: Attached? X Material Storage/material handling process Actual Units usage Maximum Units usage Monobutyltin Trichloride Material is stored in containers and applied in a hood 70,080 Lbs/ year Clean-up solvents Other (specify) 12. List the types and amounts of finished products: Material Storage/material handling process Actual Units amount produced Maximum Units amount produced NA NA NA NA 13. Process fuel usage: Type of fuel Maximum heat input to process million BTU/hr. Actual Units usage Maximum Units usage NA NA NA NA 14. Describe any fugitive emissions associated with this process, such as outdoor storage piles, unpaved roads, open conveyors, etc.:NA ***** For this emissions unit, identify the method(s) of compliance demonstration ly completing Form 2000-500,***** DESCRIPTION OF METHODS USED FOR DETERMINING COMPLIANCE. Attach Form 2000- 500 and its attachment(s) to this form. ***** Please complete the Air Pollution Control Permit Application Forms 2000-600 and 2000-601 for this Unit. ***** Operating Permit Application Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE MISCELLANEOUS PROCESSES FORM 2000-306 Rev 06-95 1. Facility name: Owens Brockway Glass Container Inc. 3. Stack identification code: NA 2. Facility identification code: CO1234406 4. Process (Unit) code: P018 5. Unit description: Two (2) cooling towers: Systems Cooling Tower and Furnaces Coding Tower 6. Indicate the control technology status. x Uncontrolled U Controlled If the process is controlled, enter the control device code(s) from the appropriate form(s): 2000-400 2000-401 2000-402 2000-403 2000-404 2000-405 2000-406 2000-407 7. Actual annual process rates for 19 8. Date first placed in service: 8/11/2005 Date of last modification: NA 9. Normal operating schedule: 24 hrs./day 7 days/wk. 8760 hours/yr. 10. Describe this process (please attach a flow diagram of the process). Cooling towers for plant processes and furnaces Attached? U 11. List the types and amounts of raw materials used in this process; Material Storage/material handling process Act Units ual usag e Maximum usage Units Water Cooling System Water 2500 gpm 12. List the types and amounts of finished products: Material Storage/material handling process Act Units ual amo unt prod uced Maximum Units amount produced NA NA NA NA 13. Process fuel usage: Type of fuel Maximum heat input to process million BTU/hr. Act Units ual usag e Maximum usage Units NA NA NA NA 14. Describe any fugitive emissions associated with this process, such as outdoor storage piles, unpaved roads, open conveyors, etc.: NA ***** For this emissions unit, identify the method(s) of compliance demonstration by completing Form 2000-500, ***** DESCRIPTION OF METHODS USED FOR DETERMINING COMPLIANCE. Attach Form 2000-500 and its attachment(s) to this form. ***** Please complete the Air Pollution Control Permit Application Forms 2000-600 and 2000-601 for this Unit- ***** Operating Permit Application Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE MISCELLANEOUS PROCESSES FORM 2000-306 Rev 06-95 1. Facility name: Owens Brockway Glass Container Inc. 3. Stack identification code: NA 2. Facility identification code: CO1234406 4. Process (Unit) code: P019 5. Unit description: Equipment and Activities vented to Batchhouse Unloading Area 6. Indicate the control technology status. fl Uncontrolled X Controlled If the process is controlled, enter the control device code(s) from the appropriate form(s): 2000-400 2000-401 2000-402 2000-403 2000-404 2000-405 2000-406 2000-407 C019 (3 devices) 7. Actual annual process rates for 19 8. Date first placed in service: 8/11/2005 Date of last modification: NA 9. Normal operating schedule: 24 hrs./day 7 days/wk. 8760 hours/yr. 10. Describe this process (please attach a flow diagram of the process). Attached? ❑ Handling of Raw Materials for the Glass Manufacturing Process 11. List the types and amounts of raw materials used in this process: Material Storage/material handling process Act Units ual usag e Maximum usage Units Glass Raw Materials(Sand, Soda Ash, Limestone, etc.) Unloading and Conveying. All processes are enclosed. 1750 Tons/day 12. List the types and amounts of finished products: Material Storage/material handling process Act Units ual amo unt prod uced Maximum Units amount produced NA NA NA NA 13. Process fuel usage: Type of fuel Maximum heat input to process million BTU/hr. Act Units ual usag e Maximum usage Units NA NA NA NA 14. Describe any fugitive emissions associated with this process, such as outdoor storage piles, unpaved roads, open conveyors, etc.: NA ***** For this emissions unit, identify the method(s) of compliance demonstration by completing Form 2000-500, ***** DESCRIPTION OF METHODS USED FOR DETERMINING COMPLIANCE. Attach Form 2000-500 and its attachment(s) to this form. ***** Please complete the Air Pollution Control Permit Application Forms 2000=600 and 2000-601 for this Unit. ***** 03 Operating Permit Application Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE MISCELLANEOUS PROCESSES FORM 2000-306 Rev 06-95 1. Facility name: Owens Brockway Glass Container Inc. 3. Stack identification code: NA 2. Facility identification code: CO1234406 4. Process (Unit) code: P020 5. Unit description: Equipment and Activities vented inside Batch House 6. Indicate the control technology status. n Uncontrolled X Controlled If the process is controlled, enter the control device code(s) from the appropriate form(s): 2000-400 2000-401 2000-402 2000-403 2000-404 2000-405 2000-406 2000-407 C020 (33 devices, 7. Actual annual process rates for 19 8. Date first placed in service: 8/11/2005 Date of last modification: NA 9. Normal operating schedule: 24 hrs./day 7 days/wk. 8760 hours/yr. 10. Describe this process (please attach a flow diagram of the process). Attached? ❑ Handling of Raw Materials for the Glass Manufacturing Process 11. List the types and amounts of raw materials used in this process: Material Storage/material handling process Act Units ual usag c Maximum usage Units Glass Raw Materials(Sand, Soda Ash, Limestone, etc.) Conveying, weighing, mixing, storing, and delivering to furnaces. All processes are enclosed. 1750 Tons/day 12. List the types and amounts of finished products: Material Storage/material handling process Act Units ual amo unt prod used Maximum Units amount produced NA NA NA NA 13. Process fuel usage: Type of fuel Maximum heat input to process million BTU/hr. Act Units ual usag e Maximum usage Units NA NA NA NA 14. Describe any fugitive emissions associated with this process, such as outdoor storage piles, unpaved roads, open conveyors, etc.: NA ***** For this emissions unit, identify the method(s) of compliance demonstration by completing Form 2000-500, ***** DESCRIPTION OF METHODS USED FOR DETERMINING COMPLIANCE. Attach Form 2000-500 and its attachment(s) to this form. ***** Please complete the Air Pollution Control Permit Application Forms 2000-600 and 2000-601 for this Unit. ***** Operating Permit Application Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE MISCELLANEOUS PROCESSES FORM 2000-306 Rev 06-95 1. Facility name: Owens Brockway Glass Container Inc. 3. Stack identification code: NA 2. Facility identification code: CO1234406 4. Process (Unit) code: P021 5. Unit description: Fugitive Sources of PM including Haul Roads, Rail Car Unloading, and Truck Unloading 6. Indicate the control technology status. X Uncontrolled U Controlled If the process is controlled, enter the control device code(9 from the appropriate form(s): 2000-400 2000-401 2000-402 2000-403 2000-404 2000-405 2000-406 2000-407 7. Actual annual process rates for 19 8. Date first placed in service: 8/11/2005 Date of last modification: NA 9. Normal operating schedule: 24 hrs./day 7 days/wk. 8760hours/yr. 10. Describe this process (please attach a flow diagram of the process). Attached? Fugitive PM emissions from haul roads, rail car unloading, and truck unloading 11. List the types and amounts of raw materials used in this process: Material Storage/material handling process Actual Units usage Maximum usage Units Raw Materials Rail car unloading of raw materials 331,384 Tons/yr Raw Materials Truck unloading of raw materials 59,349 Tons/yr Cutlet Rail car unloading of cullet 141,109 Tons/yr 12. List the types and amounts of finished products: Material Storage/material handling process Actual Units amoun t produc ed Maximum Units amount produced NA NA NA NA 13. Process fuel usage: Type of fuel Maximum heat input to pmcess million BTU/hr. Actual Units usage Maximum usage Units NA NA NA NA 14. Describe any fugitive emissions associated with this process, such as outdoor storage piles, unpaved roads, open conveyors, etc.: NA ***** ***** For this emissions unit, identify the method(s) of compliance demonstration ty completing Form 2000-500, DESCRIPTION OF METHODS USED FOR DETERMINING COMPLIANCE. Attach Form 2000-500 and its attaclunent(s) to this form. ***** Please complete the Air Pollution Control Permit Application Forms 2000-600 and 2000-601 for this Unit. ***** Operating Permit Application CONTROL EQUIPMENT - ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATORS Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE FORM 2000-405 Rev 06-95 Section A 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Cont. 3. Stack identification code: S001 5. Control device code: C102 6. Manufacturer and model number: United McGill 7. Date first placed in service: 9/11/2005 8. Describe the precipitator. Attach a diagram of the system. An electrostatic precipitator is designed for collecting particulate matter utilizing energized plates that attract particulate and are then de -energized and shaken to drop particulate matter into a hopper which is then conveyed for reuse. The unit is operated continuously except during periods of furnace startup and shutdown and during maintenance periods. 9. In the table below list the pollutants to be controlled by this equipment and the expected control efficiency for each pollutant. fl Documentation attached EITHER the outlet pollutant concentration OR the control efficiency must be provided. 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 4. Unit identification code: P001 Pollutant Emission Capture Efficiency Inlet pollutant concentration Outlet pollutant concentration Control Efficiency gr/acf ppmv gr/acf ppmv % PM 80% 10. Discuss how the collected material will be handled for reuse or disposal. 11. List the important design parameters of this device and their normal operating range (e.g., primary/secondary voltage and current, spark rate of each field, hot/cold side gas conditioning, cleaning schedules, etc.). 12. Prepare a malfunction prevention and abatement plan for this pollution control system. The plan does not have to be submitted with the application. It is suggested the plan include, but not be limited to the following: a. Identification of the individuals(s), by title, responsible for inspecting, maintaining and repairing this device. b. Operation variables that will be monitored in order to detect a malfunction or breakthrough, the correct operating range of these variables, and a detailed description of monitoring or surveillance procedures that will be used to show compliance. c. Cleaning method (mechanical rapping, magnetic impulse rappers, water sprays, etc.). d. An inspection schedule and items or conditions that will be inspected. e. Where is this plan available for review? Section B The following questions must be answered by sources installing new equipment or existing Units which cannot document control efficiency of this device by other means. 13. Length, width and height of fields or tube diameter and length (ft): 14. Design particle migration velocity (ft/sec): 15. Collection area (ft'): 16, Number of fields: 17. Inlet gas pretreatment if applicable: 18. Number and rating of transformer/rectifier sets (kilovolts and milliamperes): 19. Liquid flow rate for wet precipitators 20. Exhaust gas flow rate lacf/sec): Igal/min): NOTE: COMPLETION OF INFORMATION IN SHADED AREA OF THIS FORM IS OPTIONAL Operating Permit Application CONTROL EQUIPMENT - ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATORS Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE FORM 2000-405 Rev 06-95 Section A 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Cont. 3. Stack identification code: S002 5. Control device code: C202 6. Manufacturer and model number: United McGill 7. Date first placed in service: 8/11/2005 8. Describe the precipitator. Attach a diagram of the system. An electrostatic precipitator is designed for collecting particulate matter utilizing energized plates that attract particulate and are then de -energized and shaken to drop particulate matter into a hopper which is then conveyed for reuse. The unit is operated continuously except during periods of furnace startup and shutdown and during maintenance periods. 9. In the table below list the pollutants to be controlled by this equipment and the expected control efficiency for each pollutant. ❑ Documentation attached EITHER the outlet pollutant concentration OR the control efficiency must be provided. 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 4. Unit identification code: P002 Pollutant Emission Capture Efficiency Inlet pollutant concentration Outlet pollutant concentration Control Efficiency gr/acf ppmv gr/acf ppmv PM 800 10. Discuss how the collected material will be handled for reuse or disposal. 1 1 . List the important design parameters of this device and their normal operating range (e.g., primary/secondary voltage and current, spark rate of each field, hot/cold side gas conditioning, cleaning schedules, etc.). 12. Prepare a malfunction prevention and abatement plan for this pollution control system. The plan does not have to be submitted with the application. It is suggested the plan include, but not be limited to the following: a. Identification of the individuals(s), by title, responsible for inspecting, maintaining and repairing this device. b. Operation variables that will be monitored in order to detect a malfunction or breakthrough, the correct operating range of these variables, and a detailed description of monitoring or surveillance procedures that will be used to show compliance. c. Cleaning method (mechanical rapping, magnetic impulse rappers, water sprays, etc.). d. An inspection schedule and items or conditions that will be inspected. e. Where is this plan available for review? Section B The following questions must be answered by sources installing new equipment or existing Units which cannot document control efficiency of this device by other means. 13. Length, width and height of fields or tube diameter and length (ft): 14. Design particle migration velocity (ft/sec): 15. Collection area (ft2): 16. Number of fields: 17. Inlet gas pretreatment if applicable; 18. Number and rating of transformer/rectifier sets (kilovolts and milliamperes): 19. Liquid flow rate for wet precipitators 20. Exhaust gas flow rate (acf/sec): (gal/min): NOTE: COMPLETION OF INFORMATION IN SHADED AREA OF THIS FORM IS OPTIONAL Operating Permit Application CONTROL EQUIPMENT - COLLECTION SYSTEMS Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE FORM 2000-406 Rev 06-95 Section A I . Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. 3. Stack identification code: 5001 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 4. Unit identification code: P001 5. Control device code: C101 6. Manufacturer and model number: United McGill 7. Date unit first placed in service: 9/11/2005 Date last modified: NA 8. Describe the wet collection system. This Dry Scrubber removes SO2 by injecting Sodium Sesquicarbonate (Trona), or equivalent, which reacts with the SO2 and then doips out of the gas stream in the electrostatic precipitator. The material is then reused. 9. In the table below list the pollutants to be controlled by this equipment and the expected control efficiency for each pollutant. ❑ Documentation attached EITHER the outlet pollutant concentration OR the control efficiency must be provided. Pollutant Inlet pollutant concentration Outlet pollutant concentration Control Efficiency (%) gr/acf ppmv Lb/hr ppmv Emission Capture Pollutant Removal SO2 14.3 10. Discuss how the collected material will be handled for reuse or disposal. 11. Prepare a malfunction prevention and abatement plan for this pollution control system. The plan does not have to be submitted with the application. It is suggested the plan include, but not be limited to the following: a. Identification of the individuals(s), by title, responsible for inspecting, maintaining and repairing this device. b. Operation variables that will be monitored in order to detect a malfunction or breakthrough, the correct operating range of these variables, and a detailed description of monitoring or surveillance procedures that will be used to slow compliance. c. An inspection schedule and items or conditions that will be inspected. d. Where is this plan available for review? Section B The following questions must be answered by sources installing new equipment or existing Units which cannot document control efficiency of this device by other means. 12. Liquid flow rate (gal/min): 13. Pressure drop across the scrubber and demister (inches of HP): 15. Inlet gas temperature (EF): 17. Liquid inlet pressure (psi): 14. Inlet gas flow rate (ACFM): 16. Scrubbing medium (water, sodium hydroxide slurry, etc.): 18. For Venturi Scrubbers, inlet throat gas pressure differential and units: NOTE: COMPLETION OF INFORMATION IN SHADED AREA OF THIS FORM IS OPTIONAL Operating Permit Application CONTROL EQUIPMENT - COLLECTION SYSTEMS Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE FORM 2000-406 Rev 06-95 Section A 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. 3. Stack identification code: S002 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 4. Unit identification code: P002 5. Control device code: C201 6. Manufacturer and model number: United McGill 7. Date unit first placed in service: 8/11/2005 Date last modified: NA 8. Describe the wet collection system. This Dry Scrubber removes SO2 by injecting Sodium Sesquicarbonate (Trona), or equivalent, which reacts with the SO2 and then drops out of the gas stream in the electrostatic precipitator. The material is then reused. 9. In the table below list the pollutants to be controlled by this equipment and the expected control efficiency for each pollutant. Li Documentation attached EITHER the outlet pollutant concentration OR the control efficiency must be provided. Pollutant Inlet pollutant concentration Outlet pollutant concentration Control Efficiency (%) gr/acf ppmv Lb/hr ppmv Emission Capture Pollutant Removal SO2 14.3 10. Discuss how the collected material will be handled for reuse or disposal. 11. Prepare a malfunction prevention and abatement plan for this pollution control system. The plan does not have to be submitted with die application. It is suggested the plan include, but not be limited to the following: a. Identification of the individuals(s), by title, responsible for inspecting, maintaining and repairing this device. b. Operation variables that will be monitored in older to detect a malfunction or breakthrough, the correct operating range of these variables, and a detailed description of monitoring or surveillance procedures that will be used to slow compliance. c. An inspection schedule and items or conditions that will be inspected. d. Where is this plan available for review? Section B The following questions must be answered by sources installing new equipment or existing Units which cannot document control efficiency of this device by other means. 12. Liquid flow rate (gal/min): 14. Inlet gas flow rate (ACFM): 13. Pressure drop across the scrubber and demister (inches of HA): 15. Inlet gas temperature (EF): 16. Scrubbing medium (water, sodium hydroxide slurry, etc.): 17. Liquid inlet pressure (psi): 18. For Venturi Scrubbers, inlet throat gas pressure differential and units: NOTE: COMPLETION OF INFORMATION IN SHADED AREA OF THIS FORM IS OPTIONAL Operating Permit Application CONTROL EQUIPMENT - BAGHOUSES/FABRIC FILTERS Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE FORM 2000-407 Rev 06-95 Section A 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: NA 5. Control device code: C019 4. Unit identification code: P019 6. Manufacturer and model number: See Attachment 7. Date first placed in service: 8/11/2005 Date last modified: NA 8. Describe the filtering system used. Attach a diagram of the system; 3 Pulse Jet Baghouses 9. In the table below list the pollutants to be controlled by this equipment and the expected control efficiency for each pollutant. ❑ Documentation attached EITHER the outlet pollutant concentration OR the control efficiency must be provided. Pollutant Inlet pollutant concentrati on Outlet pollutant concentration Efficiency (%) grlacf gr/acf Emission Capture Pollutant Removal Particulate Matter 0.005 gr/dscf NA 10. Range of pressure drop across the filter (clean and dirty) (inches of H2O): 11. Discuss how the collected material will be handled for reuse or disposal. 12. Prepare a malfunction prevention and abatement plan for this pollution control system. The plan does not have to be submitted with the application. It is suggested the plan include, but not be limited to the following: a. Identification of the individuals(s), by title, responsible for inspecting, maintaining and repairing this device. b. Bag cleaning techniques and frequency of cleaning or replacement schedule for filters. c. Operation variables that will he monitored in order to detect a malfunction or breakthrough, the correct operating range of these variables, and a detailed descriptim of monitoring or surveillance procedures that will be used to show compliance. d. An inspection schedule and items or conditions that will be inspected. e. Where is this plan available for review? Section B The following questions must be answered by sources installing new equipment or existing Units which cannot document control efficiency of this device by other means. 13. Filter medium or type of fabric material (if fabric, indicate whether felt or woven; if coated, frequency of coating): 14. Maximum inlet gas flow rate 40FM)cuntber of bags if applicable: 18. Air to cloth ratio (acfm/ft'): 15. Maximum inlet gas temperature (EF): 17. Dimensions of bags/filters: Operating Permit Application CONTROL EQUIPMENT - BAGHOUSES/FABRIC FILTERS Colorado Department of Public Hcatlh and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE FORM 2000-407 Rev 06-95 Section A 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: NA 5. Control device code: C020 4. Unit identification code: P020 6. Manufacturer and model number: See Attached Spreadsheet 7. Date first placed in service: 8/11/2005 Date last modified: NA 8. Describe the filtering system used, Attach a diagram of the system. 33 Pulse Jet Baghouses 9. In the table below list the pollutants to be controlled by this equipment and the expected control efficiency for each pollutant. ❑ Documentation attached EITHER the outlet pollutant concentration OR the control efficiency must be provided. Pollutant Inlet pollutant concentrati on Outlet pollutant concentration Efficiency (%) gr/acf gr/acf Emission Capture Pollutant Removal Particulate Matter 0.005 gr/dscf NA . Range of pressure drop across the filter (clean and dirty) (inches of 112O): 11. Discuss how the collected material will be handled for reuse or disposal. 12. Prepare a malfunction prevention and abatement plan for this pollution control system. The plan does not have to be submitted with the application. It is suggested the plan include, but not be limited to the following: a. Identification of the individuals(s), by title, responsible for inspecting, maintaining and repairing this device. b. Bag cleaning techniques and frequency of cleaning or replacement schedule for filters. c. Operation variables that will be monitored in older to detect a malfunction or breakthrough, the correct operating range of these variables, and a detailed descriptim of monitoring or surveillance procedures that will be used to show compliance. d. An inspection schedule and items or conditions that will be inspected. e. Where is this plan available for review? Section B The following questions must be answered by sources installing new equipment or existing Units which cannot document control efficiency of this device by other means. 13. Filter medium or type of fabric material (if fabric, indicate whether felt or woven; if coated, frequency of coating): 14. Maximum inlet gas flow rate ga.(-"Number of bags if applicable: 18. Air to cloth ratio (actin/fl2): 15. Maximum inlet gas temperature (EF): 17. Dimensions of bags/filters: rr Owens -Brockway Glass Containers Make: FLEX KLEEN Equipment Dust Collector Location Floor Model Serial Number Number Number C019 Sand Unloading Hopper 1 100WSBS100IIIG 30747 C019 Raw Material Unloading Hopper 1 100WSBS100111G 30747 C019 Truck Unloading Hopper 1 84BVTS36111G 30752 CO20 Sand Bucket Elevator G 58BVTS25IIG 30751 CO20 Raw Material Bucket Elevator G 58BVTS25IIG 30751 CO20 Truck Bucket Elevator G 58BVTS25IIG 30751 CO20 Mixed Batch Bucket Elevator G 58BVTS25IIG 30751 CO20 Cullet Bucket Elevator G 58BVTS25IIG 30751 CO20 Sand Silo 3011 5 58BVTS25IIG 30751 CO20 Sand Silo 3012 5 58BVTS25IIG 30751 CO20 Sand Silo 3013 5 58BVTS25IIG 30751 CO20 Limestone Silo 3021 5 58BVTS25IIG 30751 CO20 Limestone Silo 3022 5 58BVTS25IIG 30751 CO20 Salt Cake Silo 3031 5 58BVTS25IIG 30749 CO20 Carbon Silo 3041 5 58BVTS25IIG 30751 CO20 Tube Scale Silo 3051 5 58BVTS25IIG 30751 CO20 Soda Ash Silos 3061 & 3062 5 58BVTS25IIG 30751 CO20 Silo 3071 5 58BVTS25IIG 30751 CO20 Syenite Silo 3081 5 58BVTS25IIG 30751 CO20 Cutlet Silo 3091 5 58BVTS25IIG 30751 CO20 Cullet Silo 3092 5 58BVTS25IIG 30751 CO20 Cutlet Silo 3093 5 58BVTS25IIG 30751 CO20 Gullet Silo 3094 5 58BVTS25IIG 30751 CO20 Minor Silo 1921 2 58BVTS911G 30750 CO20 Minor Silo Copper 1931 2 58BVTS9IIG 30750 CO20 Cullet Conveyor 1731 B 58BVTS25IIG 30749 CO20 Cullet Conveyor 1771 6 58BVTS25IIG 30751 CO20 Gathering Belt 1 58BVTS25IIG 30751 CO20 Gathering Belt 1 58BVTS25IIG 30751 CO20 A - Crossover Conveyor 6 58BVTS25IIG 30751 CO20 B - Crossover Conveyor 6 58BVTS25IIG 30751 CO20 Mixer 1 58BVTS1611G 30748 CO20 A - Left Day Bin 4 58BVTS25IIG 30749 CO20 A - Right Day Bin 4 58BVTS25IIG 30749 CO20 8 - Left Day Bin 4 58BVTS25IIG 30749 CO20 B - Right Day Bin 4 58BVTS25IIG 30749 Operating Permit Application COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION - MONITORING AND REPORTING FORM 2000-500 Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment DESCRIPTION OF METHODS USED Rev 06-95 Air Pollution Control Division FOR DETERMINING COMPLIANCE All applicants are required to certify compliance with all applicable air pollution permit requirements by including a statement within the permit application of the methods used for determining compliance. This statement must include a description of the monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements and test methods. In addition, the application must include a schedule for compliance certification submittals during the permit term. These submittals must be no less frequent than annually, and may need to be more frequent if specified by the underlying applicable requirement or by the Division. SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE 1. Facility name Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: NA 4. Unit identification code: Plantwide 5. For this Unit the following method(s) for determining compliance with the requirements of the permit will be used (check all that apply and attach the appropriate form(s) to this form). O Continuous Emission Monitoring (CEM) - Form 2000-501 Pollutant(s): ❑ Periodic Emission Monitoring Using Portable Monitors - Form 20(0-502 Pollutant(s): ❑ Monitoring Control System Parameters or Operating Parameters of a Process - Form 2000-503 Pollutant(s): ❑ Monitoring Maintenance Procedures - Form 2000-504 Pollutant(s): G Stack Testing - Form 2000-505 Pollutant(s): ❑ Fuel Sampling and Analysis (FSA) - Form 2000-506 Pollutant(s): X Recordkeeping - Form 2000-507 Pollutant(s): PM, NOx, SO2, CO, VOC ❑ Other (please describe) - Form 2000-508 Pollutant(s): 6. Compliance certification reports will be submitted to the Division according to the following schedule: Start date: 12 months after issuance of operating permit and every 12 months thereafter, (12 month maximum interval) Compliance monitoring reports will be submitted to the Division according to the following schedule: Start date: _6 Months after issuance of operating permit and every 6 months thereafter. (6 month maximum interval) NOTE: EACH APPLICABLE REQUIREMENT ON FORM 2000-604 NEEDS TO BE SPECIFICALLY ADDRESSED IN ITEM 5. Operating Permit Application COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION - MONITORING AND REPORTING FORM 2000-500 Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment DESCRIPTION OF METHODS USED Rev 06-95 Air Pollution Control Division FOR DETERMINING COMPLIANCE All applicants are required to certify compliance with all amlicable air pollution permit requirements by including a statement within the permit application of the methods used for determining compliance. This statement must include a description of the monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements and test methods. In addition, the application must include a schedule for compliance certification submittals during the permit term. These submittals must be no less frequent than annually, and may need to be more frequent if specified by the underlying applicable requirement or by the Division. SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE 1. Facility name Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: S001 4. Unit identification code: P001 5. For this Unit the following method(s) for determining compliance with the requirements of the permit will be used (check all that apply and attach the apprtpriate form(s) to this form). x Continuous Emission Monitoring (CEM) - Form 2000-501 Pollutant(s): NOx and S02 ❑ Periodic Emission Monitoring Using Portable Monitors - Form 2000-502 Pollutant(s): 0 Monitoring Control System Parameters or Operating Parameters of a Process - Form 2000-503 Pollutant(s): U Monitoring Maintenance Procedures - Form 2000-504 Pollutant(s): X Stack Testing - Form 2000-505 Pollutant(s): PM/PM10 ❑ Fuel Sampling and Analysis (FSA) - Form 2000-506 Pollutant(s): X Recordkeeping - Form 2000-507 Pollutant(s): PM/PM10, CO, VOC fl Other (please describe) - Form 2000-508 Pollutant(s): 6. Compliance certification reports will be submitted to the Division according to the following schedule: Start date: 12 months after issuance of operating permit and every 12 months thereafter. (12 month maximum interval) Compliance monitoring reports will be submitted to the Division according to the following schedule: Start date: 6 months after issuance of operating permit and every 6 months thereafter. (6 month maximum interval) NOTE: EACH APPLICABLE REQUIREMENT ON FORM 2000-604 NEEDS TO BE SPECIFICALLY ADDRESSED IN ITEM 5. Operating Permit Application COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION - MONITORING AND REPORTING FORM 2000-500 Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment DESCRIPTION OF METHODS USED Rev 06-95 Air Pollution Control Division FOR DETERMINING COMPLIANCE All applicants are required to certify compliance with all alplicable air pollution permit requirements by including a statement within the permit application of the methods used for determining compliance. This statement must include a description of the monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements and test methods. In addition, the application must include a schedule for compliance certification submittals during the permit term. These submittals must be no less frequent than annually, and may need to be more frequent if specified by the underlying applicable requirement or by the Division. SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE 1. Facility name Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: S002 4. Unit identification code: P002 5. For this Unit the following method(s) for determining compliance with the requirements of the permit will be used (check all that apply and attach the apprgriate form(s) to this form). X Continuous Emission Monitoring (CEM) - Form 2000-501 Pollutant(s): NOx and SO2 U Periodic Emission Monitoring Using Portable Monitors - Form 2000-502 Pollutant(s): ❑ Monitoring Control System Parameters or Operating Parameters of a Process - Form 2000-503 Pollutant(s): ❑ Monitoring Maintenance Procedures - Form 2000-504 Pollutant(s): X Stack Testing - Form 2000-505 Pollutant(s): PM/PM I 0 ❑ Fuel Sampling and Analysis (FSA) - Form 2000-506 Pollutant(s): X Recordkeeping - Form 2000-507 Pollutant(s): _ PM/PM10 CO VOC fl Other (please describe) - Form 2000-508 Pollutant(s): 6. Compliance certification reports will be submitted to the Division according to the following schedule: Start date: 12 months after issuance of operating permit and every 12 months thereafter. (12 month maximum interval) Compliance monitoring reports will be submitted to the Division according to the following schedule: Start date: 6 months after issuance of operating permit and every 6 months thereafter. (6 month maximum interval) NOTE: EACH APPLICABLE REQUIREMENT ON FORM 2000-604 NEEDS TO BE SPECIFICALLY ADDRESSED IN ITEM 5. Operating Permit Application COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION - MONITORING AND REPORTING FORM 2000-500 Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment DESCRIPTION OF METHODS USED Rev 06-95 Air Pollution Control Division FOR DETERMINING COMPLIANCE All applicants are required to certify compliance with all applicable air pollution permit requirements by including a statement within the permit application of the methods used for determining compliance. This statement must include a description of the monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements and test methods. In addition, the application must include a schedule for compliance certification submittals during the permit term. These submittals must be no less frequent than annually, and may need to be more frequent if specified by the underlying applicable requirement or by the Division. SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE 1. Facility name Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: NA 4. Unit identification code: P008 5. For this Unit the following method(s) for determining compliance with the requirements of the permit will be used (check all that apply and attach the appropriate form(s) to this form). ❑ Continuous Emission Monitoring (CEM) - Form 2000-501 Pollutant(s): ❑ Periodic Emission Monitoring Using Portable Monitors - Form 2000-502 Pollutant(s): o Monitoring Control System Parameters or Operating Parameters of a Process - Form 2000-503 Pollutant(s): ❑ Monitoring Maintenance Procedures - Form 2000-504 Pollutant(s): ❑ Stack Testing - Form 2000-505 Pollutant(s): Li Fuel Sampling and Analysis (FSA) - Form 2000-506 Pollutant(s): x Recordkeeping - Form 2000-507 Pollutant(s): Particulate Matter ❑ Other (please describe) - Form 2000-508 Pollutant(s): 6. Compliance certification reports will be submitted to the Division according to the following schedule: Start date: 12 months after issuance of operating permit and every 12 months thereafter. (12 month maximum interval) Compliance monitoring reports will be submitted to the Division according to the following schedule: Start date: _.6 Months after issuance of operating permit and every 6 months thereafter. (6 month maximum interval) NOTE: EACH APPLICABLE REQUIREMENT ON FORM 2000-604 NEEDS TO BE SPECIFICALLY ADDRESSED IN ITEM 5. Operating Permit Application COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION - MONITORING AND REPORTING FORM 2000-500 Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment DESCRIPTION OF METHODS USED Rev 06-95 Air Pollution Control Division FOR DETERMINING COMPLIANCE All applicants are required to certify compliance with all applicable air pollution permit requirements by including a statement within the permit application of the methods used for determining compliance. This statement must include a description of the monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements and test methods. In addition, the application must include a schedule for compliance certification submittals during the permit term. These submittals must be no less frequent than annually, and may need to be more frequent if specified by the underlying applicable requirement or by the Division. SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE 1. Facility name Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: NA 4. Unit identification code: P009 5. For this Unit the following method(s) for determining compliance with the requirements of the permit will be used (check all that apply and attach the apprcpriate form(s) to this form). o Continuous Emission Monitoring (CEM) - Form 2000-501 Pollutant(s): ❑ Periodic Emission Monitoring Using Portable Monitors - Form 20W-502 Pollutant(s): ❑ Monitoring Control System Parameters or Operating Parameters of a Process - Form 2000-503 Pollutant(s): ❑ Monitoring Maintenance Procedures - Form 2000-504 Pollutant(s): ❑ Stack Testing - Form 2000-5O5 Pollutant(s): ❑ Fuel Sampling and Analysis (FSA) - Form 2000-506 Pollutant(s): X Recordkeeping - Form 2000-507 Pollutant(s): VOC Cl Other (please describe) - Form 2000-508 Pollutant(s): 6. Compliance certification reports will be submitted to the Division according to the following schedule: Start date: 12 months after issuance of operating permit and every 12 months thereafter. (12 month maximum interval) Compliance monitoring reports will be submitted to the Division according to the following schedule: Start date: _6 Months after issuance of operating permit and every 6 months thereafter. (6 month maximum interval) NOTE: EACH APPLICABLE REQUIREMENT ON FORM 2000-604 NEEDS TO BE SPECIFICALLY ADDRESSED IN ITEM 5. Operating Permit Application COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION - MONITORING AND REPORTING FORM 2000-500 Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment DESCRIPTION OF METHODS USED Rev 06-95 Air Pollution Control Division FOR DETERMINING COMPLIANCE All applicants are required to certify compliance with all applicable air pollution permit requirements by including a statement within the permit application of the methods used for determining compliance. This statement must include a description of the monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements and test methods. In addition, tie application must include a schedule for compliance certification submittals during the permit term. These submittals must be no less frequent than annually, and may need to be more frequent if specified by the underlying applicable requirement or by the Division. SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE 1. Facility name Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: S003 4. Unit identification code: P011 5. For this Unit the following method(s) for determining compliance with the requirements of the permit will be used (check all that apply and attach the appropriate form(s) to this form). U Continuous Emission Monitoring (CEM) - Form 2000-501 Pollutant(s): U Periodic Emission Monitoring Using Portable Monitors - Form 2000-502 Pollutant(s): ❑ Monitoring Control System Parameters or Operating Parameters of a Process - Form 2000-503 Pollutant(s): ❑ Monitoring Maintenance Procedures - Form 2000-504 Pollutant(s): ❑ Stack Testing - Form 2000-5O5 Pollutant(s): ❑ Fuel Sampling and Analysis (FSA) - Form 2000-506 Pollutant(s): x Recordkeeping - Form 2000-507 Pollutant(s): NOx 502, PM CO, VOC ❑ Other (please describe) - Form 2000-508 Pollutant(s): 6. Compliance certification reports will be submitted to the Division according to the following schedule: Start date: 12 months after issuance of operating permit and every 12 months thereafter. (12 month maximum interval) Compliance monitoring reports will be submitted to the Division according to the following schedule: Start date: _ 6 Months after issuance of operating permit and every 6 months thereafter. (6 month maximum interval) NOTE: EACH APPLICABLE REQUIREMENT ON FORM 2000-604 NEEDS TO BE SPECIFICALLY ADDRESSED IN ITEM 5. Operating Permit Application COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION - MONITORING AND REPORTING FORM 2000-500 Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment DESCRIPTION OF METHODS USED Rev 06-95 Air Pollution Control Division FOR DETERMINING COMPLIANCE All applicants are required to certify compliance with all alplicable air pollution permit requirements by including a statement within the permit application of the methods used for determining compliance. This statement must include a description of the monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements and test methods. In addition, the application must include a schedule for compliance certification submittals during the permit term. These submittals must be no less frequent than annually, and may need to be more frequent if specified by the underlying applicable requirement or by the Division. SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE Facility name Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: S004 4. Unit identification code: P012 5. For this Unit the following method(s) for determining compliance with the requirements of the permit will be used (check all that apply and attach the appropriate form(s) to this form). ❑ Continuous Emission Monitoring (CEM) - Form 2000-501 Pollutant(s): LJ Periodic Emission Monitoring Using Portable Monitors - Form 2000-502 Pollutant(s): ❑ Monitoring Control System Parameters or Operating Parameters of a Process - Form 2000-503 Pollutant(s): fl Monitoring Maintenance Procedures - Form 2000-504 Pollutant(s): ❑ Stack Testing - Form 2000-505 Pollutant(s): ❑ Fuel Sampling and Analysis (FSA) - Form 2000-506 Pollutant(s): X Recordkeeping - Form 2000-507 Pollutant(s): NOx, 5O2, PM, CO, VOC ❑ Other (please describe) - Form 2000-508 Pollutant(s): 6. Compliance certification reports will be submitted to the Division according to the following schedule: Start date: 12 months after issuance of operating permit and every 12 months thereafter. (12 month maximum interval) Compliance monitoring reports will be submitted to the Division according to the following schedule: Start date: _6 Months after issuance of operating permit and every 6 months thereafter. (6 month maximum interval) NOTE: EACH APPLICABLE REQUIREMENT ON FORM 2000-604 NEEDS TO BE SPECIFICALLY ADDRESSED IN ITEM 5. Operating Permit Application COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION - MONITORING AND REPORTING FORM 2000-500 Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment DESCRIPTION OF METHODS USED Rev 06-95 Air Pollution Control Division FOR DETERMINING COMPLIANCE All applicants are required to certify compliance with all applicable air pollution permit requirements by including a statement within the permit application of the methods used for determining compliance. This statement must include a description of the monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements and test methods. In addition, the application must include a schedule for compliance certification submittals during the permit term. These submittals must be no less frequent than annually, and may need to be more frequent if specified by the underlying applicable requirement or by the Division. SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE 1. Facility name Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: NA 4. Unit identification code: P015 5. For this Unit the following method(s) for determining compliance with the requirements of the permit will be used (check all that apply and attach the appropriate form(s) to this form). o Continuous Emission Monitoring (CEM) - Form 2000-501 Pollutant(s): ❑ Periodic Emission Monitoring Using Portable Monitors - Form 2000-502 Pollutant(s): fl Monitoring Control System Parameters or Operating Parameters of a Process - Form 2000-503 Pollutant(s): ❑ Monitoring Maintenance Procedures - Form 2000-504 Pollutant(s): O Stack Testing - Form 2000-505 Pollutant(s): U Fuel Sampling and Analysis (FSA) - Form 2000-506 Pollutant(s): X Recordkeeping - Form 2000-507 Pollutant(s): VOC ❑ Other (please describe) - Form 2000-508 Pollutant(s): 6. Compliance certification reports will be submitted to the Division according to the following schedule: Start date: 12 months after issuance of operating permit and every 12 months thereafter. (12 month maximum interval) Compliance monitoring reports will be submitted to the Division according to the following schedule: Start date: _6 Months after issuance of operating permit and every 6 months thereafter. (6 month maximum interval) NOTE: EACH APPLICABLE REQUIREMENT ON FORM 2000-604 NEEDS TO BE SPECIFICALLY ADDRESSED IN ITEM 5. Operating Permit Application COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION - MONITORING AND REPORTING FORM 2000400 Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment DESCRIPTION OF METHODS USED Rev 06-95 Air Pollution Control Division FOR DETERMINING COMPLIANCE All applicants are required to certify compliance with all malleable air pollution permit requirements by including a statement within the permit application of the methods used for determining compliance. This statement must include a description of the monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements and test methods. In addition, the application must include a schedule for compliance certification submittals during the permit term. These submittals must be no less frequent than annually, and may need to be more frequent if specified by the underlying applicable requirement or by the Division. SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE 1. Facility name Owens Brockway Glass Container, Inc 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: NA 4. Unit identification code: P019 5. For this Unit the following method(s) for determining compliance with the requirements of the permit will be used (check all that apply and attach the appropriate form(s) to this form). ❑ Continuous Emission Monitoring (CEM) - Form 2000-501 Pollutant(s): ❑ Periodic Emission Monitoring Using Portable Monitors - Form 20W-502 Pollutant(s): ❑ Monitoring Control System Parameters or Operating Parameters of a Process - Form 2000-503 Pollutant(s): fl Monitoring Maintenance Procedures - Form 2000-504 Pollutant(s): ❑ Stack Testing - Form 2000-5Cl5 Pollutant(s): ❑ Fuel Sampling and Analysis (FSA) - Form 2000-506 Pollutant(s): ❑ Recordkeeping - Form 2010-507 Pollutant(s): X Other (please describe) - Form 2000-508 Pollutant(s): PM 6. Compliance certification reports will be submitted to the Division according to the following schedule: Start date: 12 Months after issuance of operatingerntit and every 12 months thereafter. (12 month maximum interval) Compliance monitoring reports will be submitted to the Division according to the following schedule: Start date: 6 Months after issuance of operating permit and every 6 months thereafter. (6 month maximum interval) NOTE: EACH APPLICABLE REQUIREMENT ON FORM 2000-604 NEEDS TO BE SPECIFICALLY ADDRESSED IN ITEM 5. Operating Permit Application COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION - MONITORING AND REPORTING FORM 2000-500 Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment DESCRIPTION OF METHODS USED Rev 06-95 Air Pollution Control Division FOR DETERMINING COMPLIANCE All applicants are required to certify compliance with all applicable air pollution permit requirements by including a statement within the permit application of the methods used for determining compliance. This statement must include a description of the monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements and test methods. In addition, the application must include a schedule for compliance certification submittals during the permit term. These submittals must be no less frequent than annually, and may need to be more frequent if specified by the underlying applicable requirement or by the Division. SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE Facility name Owens Brockway Glass Container, Inc 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: NA 4. Unit identification code: P020 5. For this Unit the following method(s) for determining compliance with the requirements of the permit will be used (check all that apply and attach the appropriate form(s) to this form). ❑ Continuous Emission Monitoring (CEM) - Form 2000-501 Pollutant(s): ❑ Periodic Emission Monitoring Using Portable Monitors - Form 2000-502 Pollutant(s): ❑ Monitoring Control System Parameters or Operating Parameters of a Process - Form 2000-503 Pollutant(s): ❑ Monitoring Maintenance Procedures - Form 2000-504 Pollutant(s): ❑ Stack Testing - Form 2000-505 Pollutant(s): ❑ Fuel Sampling and Analysis (FSA) - Form 2000-506 Pollutant(s): ❑ Recordkeeping - Form 2000-507 Pollutant(s): X Other (please describe) - Form 2000-508 Pollutant(s): PM 6. Compliance certiiccatipn reports will be submitted to the Division according to the following schedule: Start date: 12 Months after issuance of operating permit and every 12 months thereafter. (12 month maximum interval) Compliance monitoring reports will be submitted to the Division according to the following schedule: Start date: 6 Months after issuance of operatingpermit and every 6 months thereafter. (6 month maximum interval) NOTE: EACH APPLICABLE REQUIREMENT ON FORM 2000-604 NEEDS TO BE SPECIFICALLY ADDRESSED IN ITEM 5. Operating Permit Application COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION - MONITORING AND REPORTING FORM 2000-500 Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment DESCRIPTION OF METHODS USED Rev 06-95 Air Pollution Control Division FOR DETERMINING COMPLIANCE All applicants are required to certify compliance with all applicable air pollution permit requirements by including a statement within the permit application of the methods used for determining compliance. This statement must include a description of the monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements and test methods. In addition, the application must include a schedule for compliance certification submittals during the permit tenn. These submittals must be no less frequent than annually, and may need to be more frequent if specified by the underlying applicable requirement or by the Division. SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE 1. Facility name Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code:Fugitive 4. Unit identification code: P021 5. For this Unit the following method(s) for determining compliance with the requirements of the permit will be used (check all that apply and attach the appropriate form(s) to this form). ❑ Continuous Emission Monitoring (CEM) - Form 2000-501 Pollutant(s): ❑ Periodic Emission Monitoring Using Portable Monitors - Form 2000-502 Pollutant(s): O Monitoring Control System Parameters or Operating Parameters of a Process - Form 2000-503 Pollutant(s): ❑ Monitoring Maintenance Procedures - Form 2000-504 Pollutant(s): O Stack Testing - Form 2000-505 Pollutant(s): ❑ Fuel Sampling and Analysis (FSA) - Form 2000-506 Pollutant(s): X Recordkeeping - Form 2000-507 Pollutant(s): Particu;ate_Minter ❑ Other (please describe) - Form 2000-508 Pollutant(s): 6. Compliance certification reports will be submitted to the Division according to the following schedule: Start date: 12 months after issuance of operatingpermit and every 12 months thereafter. (12 month maximum interval) Compliance monitoring reports will be submitted to the Division according to the following schedule: Start date: 6 Months after issuance of operating permit and every 6 months thereafter. (6 month maximum interval) NOTE: EACH APPLICABLE REQUIREMENT ON FORM 2000-604 NEEDS TO BE SPECIFICALLY ADDRESSED IN ITEM 5. Operating Permit Application COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION BY FORM 2000-501 Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORING Rev 06-95 Air Pollution Control Division An installation plan for each new (i.e., proposed) Continuous Emission Monitoring (CEMI system shall be submitted with the permit application for Division approval. Installation plans for existing CEMs are not required to be submitted with the permit application. The installation plan shall contain the following information: the name and address of the source; the source facility identification code; a general description of the process and the control equipment; the pollutant or diluent being monitored; the manufacturer, model number, and serial number of each analyzer; the operating principles of each analyzer; a schematic of the CEM system showing the sample acquisition point and the location of the monitors; and an explanation of any deviations from the siting criteria in Performance Specifications 1,2,3,4,5,6 and 7 in 40 CFR part 60, Appendix B. SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: 5001 4. Unit identification code: P001 5. Pollutant being monitored: (If other than opacity then item 6 or 7 will be required) SOx a. Name of manufacturer: API b. Model & serial number:100e S/N: 1140 c. Is this an existing system x Yes ❑ No d. Implementation date: 6/8/2006 e. Type ❑ In situ ❑ Extractive xDilution ❑ Other (specify) f. Very briefly explain the measurement design concept of the monitor: 100:1 dilution extraction probe with a ultraviolet flouresence monitor g. Backup system: Data Substitution h. x The CEM system was certified by the Division on 6/8/2006 . ❑ The CEM system is not certified, but the certificat ion package was submitted to the Division on _ _ . ❑ The certification will be submitted to the Division by the date shown in our monitoring/compliance plan. x A CEM system Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan is attached for Division review. 0 The plan is not attached but will be submitted to the Division by . ❑ The plan will be submitted to the Division by the date shown in our monitoring/compliance plan. 6. Diluent being monitored: CO2 a. Name of manufacturer: API b. Model & serial number: 360e S/N: 88 o. Is this an existing system x Yes ❑ No d. Date first placed in service: 12/7/2005 e. Type ❑ In situ xExtractive ❑ 02 x CO2 n Other (specify) f. Describe how the monitor works: 100:1 dilution extraction probe with an infrared gas filter correlation analyzer g. Backup system: Data Substitution h. x The CEM system was certified by the Division on _6/8!2006 . ❑ The CEM system is not certified, but the certification package was submitted to the Division on . ❑ The certification will be submitted to the Division by the date shown in our monitoring/compliance plan. x A CEM system Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan is attached for Division review. U The plan is not attached but will be submitted to the Division by . ❑ The plan will be submitted to the Division by the date shown in our monitoring/compliance plan. 7. Stack Gas Flow: Calculated Flow a. Name of manufacturer: ESC b. Model & serial number: 8832 S/N:A0957 c. Is this an existing system xYes ❑ No d. Date first placed in service: 12/7/2005 e. Type ❑ Differential pressure U Thermal x Other (specify) Flow Calculation f. Describe how the monitor works: System uses stack CO2, natural gas use, furnace pull rate, and cullet to calculate stack flow. g. Backup system: Data Substitution h. X The CEM system was certified by the Division on _ .6/8/2006 . ❑ The CEM system is not certified, but the certification package was submitted to the Division on _ _ _ . U The certification will be submitted to the Division by the date shown in our monitoring/compliance plan. x A CEM system Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan is attached for Division review. ❑ The plan is not attached but will be submitted to the Division by . ❑ The plan will be submitted to the Division by the date shown in our monitoring/compliance plan. v TION BY FORM 2000-501 Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORING Rev 06-95 Air Pollution Control Division An installation plan for each new li.e., proposed) Continuous Emission Monitoring ICEMI system shall be submitted with the permit application for Division approval. Installation plans for existing CEMs are not required to be submitted with the permit application. The installation plan shall contain the following information: the name and address of the source; the source facility Identification code; a general description of the process and the control equipment; the pollutant or diluent being monitored; the manufacturer, model number, and serial number of each analyzer; the operating principles of each analyzer; a schematic of the CEM system showing the sample acquisition point and the location of the monitors; and an explanation of any deviations from the siting criteria in Performance Specifications 1,2,3,4,5,6 and 7 in 40 CFR part 60, Appendix B. SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: S001 4. Unit identification code: P001 5. Pollutant being monitored: (If other than opacity then item 6 or 7 will be required) NOx a. Name of manufacturer: Teledyne -API b. Model & serial number:200e S/N:794 c. Is this an existing system X Yes ❑ No d. Implementation date: 12/7/2005 e. Type 0 In situ ❑ Extractive XDilution ❑ Other (specify) f. Very briefly explain the measurement design concept of the monitor: 100:1 dilution extraction probe with a chemiluminescence analyzer 9• Backup system: Data Substitution h. x The CEM system was certified by the Division on 6/8/2006 . ❑ The CEM system is not certified, but the certificat ion package was submitted to the Division on . ❑ The certification will be submitted to the Division by the date shown in our monitoring/compliance plan. x A CEM system Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan is attached for Division review. Li The plan is not attached but will be submitted to the Division by _ _ . U The plan will be submitted to the Division by the date shown in our monitoring/compliance plan. 6. Diluent being monitored: CO2 a. Name of manufacturer: Teledyne -API b. Model & serial number:360e S/N:88 c. Is this an existing system x Yes ❑ No d. Date first placed in service: 12/7/2005 e. Type U In situ xExtractive fl 02 x CO2 ❑ Other (specify) f. Describe how the monitor works: 100:1 dilution extraction probe with an infrared gas filter correlation analyzer g. Backup system: Data Substitution h. X The CEM system was certified by the Division on package was submitted to the Division on shown in our monitoring/compliance plan. x A CEM system Quality Assurance/Quality Control will be submitted to the Division by monitoring/compliance plan. 6/8/2006 ❑ The CEM system is not certified, but the certification . U The certification will be submitted to the Division by the date Plan is attached for Division review. Li The plan is not attached but El The plan will be submitted to the Division by the date shown in our 7. Stack Gas Flow: Calculated Flow a. Name of manufacturer: ESC b. Model & serial number: 8832 S/N:A0957 a. Is this an existing system xYes ❑ No d. Date first placed in service: 12/7/2005 e. Type ❑ Differential pressure ❑ Thermal x Other (specify) Flow Calculation f. Describe how the monitor works: System uses stack CO2, natural gas use and heating value, furnace pull rate, and cullet % to calculate stack flow. 9 Backup system: Data Substitution h. X The CEM system was certified by the Division on 6/8/2006 . ❑ The CEM system is not certified, but the certification package was submitted to the Division on . ❑ The certification will be submitted to the Division by the date shown in our monitoring/compliance plan. X A CEM system Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan is attached for Division review. Li The plan is not attached but will be submitted to the Division by ,. ❑ The plan will be submitted to the Division by the date shown in our monitoring/compliance plan. ^Ir TION BY FORM 2000-501 Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORING Rev 06-95 Air Pollution Control Division An installation plan for each new (i.e., proposed) Continuous Emission Monitoring (CEMI system shall be submitted with the permit application for Division approval. Installation plans for existing CEMs are not required to be submitted with the permit application. The installation plan shall contain the following information: the name and address of the source; the source facility identification code; a general description of the process and the control equipment; the pollutant or diluent being monitored; the manufacturer, model number, and serial number of each analyzer; the operating principles of each analyzer; a schematic of the CEM system showing the sample acquisition point and the location of the monitors; and an explanation of any deviations from the siting criteria in Performance Specifications 1,2,3,4,5,6 and 7 in 40 CFR part 60, Appendix B. SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: S002 4. Unit identification code: P002 5. Pollutant being monitored: (If other than opacity then item 6 or 7 will be required) NOx a. Name of manufacturer: Teledyne -API b. Model & serial number:200e S/N:796 c. Is this an existing system X Yes ❑ No d. Implementation date: 12/8/2005 e. Type ❑ In situ 0 Extractive xDilution D Other (specify) f. Very briefly explain the measurement design concept of the monitor: 100:1 dilution extraction probe with a chemiluminescence analyzer 9 - Backup system: Data Substitution h. X The CEM system was certified by the Division on 6/8/2006 . U The CEM system is not certified, but the certificat ion package was submitted to the Division on . ❑ The certification will be submitted to the Division by the date shown in our monitoring/compliance plan. x A CEM system Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan is attached for Division review. ❑ The plan is not attached but will be submitted to the Division by . 7 The plan will be submitted to the Division by the date shown in our monitoring/compliance plan. 6. Diluent being monitored: CO2 a. Name of manufacturer: Teledyne -API b. Model & serial number:360e S/N:89 c. Is this an existing system X Yes U No d. Date first placed in service: 12/8/2005 e. Type ❑ In situ xExtractive ❑ 02 x CO2 ❑ Other (specify) f. Describe how the monitor works: 100:1 dilution extraction probe with an infrared gas filter correlation analyzer 9 Backup system: Data Substitution h. x The CEM system was certified by the Division on package was submitted to the Division on 6/8/2006 . U The CEM system is not certified, but the certification . ❑ The certification will be submitted to the Division by the date shown in our monitoring/compliance plan. x A CEM system Quality Assurance/Quality Control will be submitted to the Division by monitoring/compliance plan. Plan is attached for Division review. U The plan is not attached but 7 The plan will be submitted to the Division by the date shown in our 7. Stack Gas Flow: Calculated Flow a. Name of manufacturer: ESC b. Model & serial number: 8832 S/N:A0957 c. Is this an existing system xYes El No d. Date first placed in service: 12/8/2005 e. Type ❑ Differential pressure ❑ Thermal X Other (specify) Flow Calculation f. Describe how the monitor works: System uses stack CO2, natural gas use and heating value, furnace pull rate, and cullet % to calculate stack flow. 9• Backup system: Data Substitution h. x The CEM system was certified by the Division on 6/8/2006_.. [1 The CEM system is not certified, but the certification package was submitted to the Division on — __ ❑ The certification will be submitted to the Division by the date shown in our monitoring/compliance plan. x A CEM system Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan is attached for Division review. ❑ The plan is not attached but will be submitted to the Division by . U The plan will be submitted to the Division by the date shown in our monitoring/compliance plan. Operating Permit Application COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION BY FORM 2000-501 Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORING Rev 06-95 Air Pollution Control Division An installation plan for each new li.e., proposed) Continuous Emission Monitoring ICEMI system shall be submitted with the permit application for Division approval. Installation plans for existing CEMs are not required to be submitted with the permit application. The installation plan shall contain the following information: the name and address of the source; the source facility identification code; a general description of the process and the control equipment; the pollutant or diluent being monitored; the manufacturer, model number, and serial number of each analyzer; the operating principles of each analyzer; a schematic of the CEM system showing the sample acquisition point and the location of the monitors; and an explanation of any deviations from the siting criteria in Performance Specifications 1,2,3,4,5,6 and 7 in 40 CFR part 60, Appendix B. SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: S002 4. Unit identification code: P002 5. Pollutant being monitored: (If other than opacity then item 6 or 7 will be required) SOx a. Name of manufacturer: API b. Model & serial number:100e S/N: 1141 c. Is this an existing system X Yes ❑ No d. Implementation date: 6/8/2006 e. Type ❑ In situ Extractive xDilution ❑ Other (specify) f. Very briefly explain the measurement design concept of the monitor: 100:1 dilution extraction probe with a ultraviolet flouresence monitor g. Backup system: Data Substitution h. X The CEM system was certified by the Division on 6/8/2006 . ❑ The CEM system is not certified, but the certificat ion package was submitted to the Division on . ❑ The certification will be submitted to the Division by the date shown in our monitoring/compliance plan. X A CEM system Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan is attached for Division review. ❑ The plan is not attached but will be submitted to the Division by _ . ❑ The plan will be submitted to the Division by the date shown in our monitoring/compliance plan. 6. Diluent being monitored: CO2 a. Name of manufacturer: API b. Model & serial number: 360e S/N: 89 c. Is this an existing system x Yes ❑ No d. Date first placed in service: 12/8/2005 e. Type ❑ In situ xExtractive ❑ 02 x CO2 IT Other (specify) f. Describe how the monitor works: 100:1 dilution extraction probe with an infrared gas filter correlation analyzer g. Backup system: Data Substitution h. X The CEM system was certified by the Division on 6/8/2006 . ❑ The CEM system is not certified, but the certification package was submitted to the Division on .. . ❑ The certification will be submitted to the Division by the date shown in our monitoring/compliance plan. X A CEM system Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan is attached for Division review. ❑ The plan is not attached but will be submitted to the Division by . _ ❑ The plan will be submitted to the Division by the date shown in our monitoring/compliance plan. 7. Stack Gas Flow: Calculated Flow a. Name of manufacturer: ESC b. Model & serial number: 8832 S/N:A0957 c. Is this an existing system XYes ❑ No d. Date first placed in service: 12/8/2005 e. Type ❑ Differential pressure ❑ Thermal X Other (specify) Flow Calculation f. Describe how the monitor works: System uses stack CO2, natural gas use, furnace pull rate, and cullet to calculate stack flow. g. Backup system: Data Substitution h. X The CEM system was certified by the Division on 6/8/2006 . ❑ The CEM system is not certified, but the certification package was submitted to the Division on . ❑ The certification will be submitted to the Division by the date shown in our monitoring/compliance plan. X A CEM system Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan is attached for Division review. ❑ The plan is not attached but will be submitted to the Division by . ❑ The plan will be submitted to the Division by the date shown in our monitoring/compliance plan. Ur Operating Permit Application COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION BY STACK TESTING FORM 2000-505 Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment 09-94 Air Pollution Control Division The performance of an EPA stack test method is acceptable for demonstrating compliance with an emission limitation. EPA test methods contain quality assurance procedures that shall be strictly adhered to by the source. The applicant shall propose an appropriate program of stack testing for compliance demonstration. The stack testing program shall correlate with the corresponding emission limitation in terms of the frequency and duratitn of the stack tests. The Division may approve the proposed stack testing program, or other programs which the Division determines to be appropriate. SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2, Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: S001 4. Unit identification code: P001 5. Pollutant being monitored: Particulate Matter 6. Procedure being monitored: Recordkeeping 7. Is this an existing method of demonstrating compliance? xYes 11 No 9. EPA or Division approved test method: Methods 5 and 202 8. Program start date: 2/1/2006 10. Backup system NA 11. Compliance shall be demonstrated: 0 Daily 0 Weekly period ❑ Monthly X Other - specify Once per permit ***** Any measured emission rate that exceeds an emission limitation established by the permit shall be ***** reported as an excess emission. Operating Permit Application COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION BY STACK TESTING FORM 2000-505 Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment 09.94 Air Pollution Control Division The performance of an EPA stack test method is acceptable for demonstrating compliance with an emission limitation. EPA test methods contain quality assurance procedures that shall be strictly adhered to by the source. The applicant shall propcse an appropriate program of stack testing for compliance demonstration. The stack testing program shall correlate with the corresponding emission limitation in terms of the frequency and duratim of the stack tests. The Division may approve the proposed stack testing program, or other programs which the Division determines to be appropriate. SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: S002 4. Unit identification code: P002 5. Pollutant being monitored: Particulate Matter 6. Procedure being monitored: Recordkeeping 7. Is this an existing method of demonstrating compliance? X Yes ❑ No 9. EPA or Division approved test method: Methods 5 and 202 8. Program start date: 2/2/2006 10. Backup system NA 11. Compliance shall be demonstrated: ❑ Daily IT Weekly period ❑ Monthly X Other - specify Once per permit ***** Any measured emission rate that exceeds an emission limitation establithed by the permit shall be ***** reported as an excess emission. Operating Permit Application COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION FORM 2000-507 Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment BY RECORDICEEPING Rev 06-95 Air Pollution Control Division Recordkeeping may be acceptable as a compliance demonstration method provided that a correlation between the parameter value recorded and the emission rate of a particular pollutant is established in the form of a curve or chart of emission rate versus parameter values. This correlation may constitute the certification of the system. For an existing program, the correlation demonstration must be attached for Division consideration for approval. If the correlation information has not yet been developed, please submit it within 60 days of the startup of the system. SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: NA 4. Unit identification code: Plantwide 5. Pollutant(s) being monitored:_PM, NOx, SO2, CO, VOC 6. Material or parameter being monitored and recorded: Natural Gas consumption 7. Method of monitoring and recording (see information on back of this page): Total plant consumption of natural gas. 8. List any EPA methods used: NA 9. Is this an existing method of demonstrating compliance? X Yes ❑ No l l . Backup system: NA 10. Start date: 8/11/2005 12 a. Data collection frequency: El Daily ❑ Weekly X Monthly El Batch (not to exceed monthly) ❑ Other - specify 12 b. Compliance shall be demonstrated: ❑ Daily ❑ Weekly ❑ Monthly LI Batch (not to exceed monthly) x Other - specify Annually 13. Quality Control/Quality Assurance: The monitoring system shall be subject to appropriate performance specifications, calibration requirements, and Talky assurance procedures. U A quality assurance/quality control plan for the rccordkeeping system is attached for Division review. X The plan is not attached, but will he submitted to the Division by 10/1/2006 . 14. ❑ A proposed format for the compliance certification report and excess emission reports attached. ***** The compliance records shall be available for Division inspection. The source shall record any malfunction that causes or may cause an emission limit to be exceeded. ***** Malfunctions shall be reported to the Division the next business day. Hazardous air releases shall be reported to the Division immediately. Operating Permit Application COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION FORM 2000-507 Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment BY RECORDKEEPING Rev 06-95 Air Pollution Control Division Recordkeeping may be acceptable as a compliance demonstration method pi -added that a correlation between the parameter value recorded and the emission rate of a particular pollutant is established in the form of a curve or chart of emission rate versus parameter values. This correlation may constitute the certification of the system. For an existing program, the correlation demonstration must be attached for Division consideration for approval. If the correlation information has not yet been developed, please submit it within 60 days of the startup of the system. SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: S001 4. Unit identification code: P001 5. Pollutant(s) being monitored: PM, CO, VOC 6. Material or parameter being monitored and recorded: Tons of glass pulled from Furnace 7. Method of monitoring and recording (see information on back of this page): The furnace pull rate is monitored according to the following equation: Bottles Per Minute Produced x Weight of Bottle x Minutes of Operation per day = Tons pulled per day 8. List any EPA methods used: NA 9. Is this an existing method of demonstrating compliance? x Yes ❑ No 11. Backup system: NA 10. Start date: 9/11/2005 12 a. Data collection frequency: X Daily U Weekly fl Monthly ❑ Batch (not to exceed monthly) ❑ Other - specify 12 b. Compliance shall be demonstrated: U Daily U Weekly X Monthly El Batch (not to exceed monthly) U Other - specify 13. Quality Control/Quality Assurance: The monitoring system shall be subject to appropriate performance specifications, calibration requirements, and gtality assurance procedures. U A quality assurance/quality control plan for the recordkeeping system is attached for Division review. x The plan is not attached, but will be submitted to the Division by 10/1/2006 . 14. U A proposed format for the compliance certification report and excess emission reports attached. ***** The compliance records shall be available for Division inspection. The source shall record any malfunction that causes or may cause an cmission limit to be exceeded. ***** Malfunctions shall be reported to the Division the next business day. Hazardous air releases shall be reported to the Division immediately. Operating Permit Application COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION FORM 2000-507 Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment BY RECORDKEEPING Rev 06-95 Air Pollution Control Division Recordkeeping may be acceptable as a compliance demonstration method provided that a correlation between the parameter value recorded and the emission rate of a particular pollutant is established in the form of a curve or chart of emission rate versus parameter values. This correlation may constitute the certification of the system. For an existing program, the correlation demonstration must be attached for Division consideration for approval. If the correlation information has not yet been developed, please submit it within 60 days of the startup of the system. SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: S002 4. Unit identification code: P002 5. Pollutant(s) being monitored: PM, CO, VOC 6. Material or parameter being monitored and recorded: Tons of glass pulled from Furnace 7. Method of monitoring and recording (see information on back of this page): The furnace pull rate is monitored according to the following equation: Bottles Per Minute Produced x Weight of Bottle x Minutes of Operation per day = Tons pulled per day 8. List any EPA methods used: NA 9. Is this an existing method of demonstrating compliance? X Yes ❑ No 11. Backup system: NA 10. Start date: 8/11/2005 12 a. Data collection frequency: x Daily 0 Weekly ❑ Monthly ❑ Batch (not to exceed monthly) ❑ Other - specify 12 b. Compliance shall be demonstrated: ❑ Daily U Weekly X Monthly U Batch (not to exceed monthly) ❑ Other - specify 13. Quality Control/Quality Assurance: The monitoring system shall be subject to appropriate performance specifications, calibration requirements, and gtality assurance procedures. fl A quality assurance/quality control plan for the recordkeeping system is attached for Division review. X The plan is not attached, but will be submitted to the Division by 10/1/2006 . 14. fl A proposed format for the compliance certification report and excess emission report attached. ***** ***** The compliance records shall be available for Division inspection. The source shall record any malfunction that causes or may cause an emission limit to be exceeded. Malfunctions shall be reported to the Division the next business day. Hazardous air releases shall be reported to the Division immediately. ***** Operating Permit Application COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION FORM 2000-507 Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment BY RECORDKEEPING Rev 06-95 Air Pollution Control Division Recordkeeping may be acceptable as a compliance demonstration method pro/ided that a correlation between the parameter value recorded and the emission rate of a particular pollutant is established in the form of a curve or chart of emission rate versus parameter values. This correlation may constitute the certification of the system. For an existing program, the correlation demonstration must be attached for Division consideration for approval. If the correlation information has not yet been developed, please submit it within 60 days of the startup of the system. SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: NA 4. Unit identification code: P008 5. Pollutant(s) being monitored: PM 6. Material or parameter being monitored and recorded: Mould Lubricant Consumption 7. Method of monitoring and recording (see information on back of this page): Mould lubricant consumption is recorded. 8. List any EPA methods used: NA 9. Is this an existing method of demonstrating compliance? X Yes fl No 11. Backup system: NA 10. Start date: 8/11/2W5 12 a. Data collection frequency: U Daily ❑ Weekly x Monthly 12 b. Compliance shall be demonstrated: ❑ Daily U Weekly X Monthly ❑ Batch (not to exceed monthly) ❑ Batch (not to exceed monthly) U Other - specify x Other - specify Annually 13. Quality Control/Quality Assurance. The monitoring system shall be subject to appropriate performance specifications, calibration requirements, and giality assurance procedures. ❑ A quality assurance/quality control plan for the recordkeeping system is attached for Division review. X The plan is not attached, but will be submitted to the Division by 10/1/2006 . 14. U A proposed format for the compliance certification report and excess emission reports attached. ***** The compliance records shall be available for Division inspection. The source shall record any malfunction that causes or may cause an emission limit to be exceeded Malfunctions shall be reported to the Division the next business day. Hazardous air releases shall be reported to the Division immediately. ****k Operating Permit Application COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION FORM 2000-507 Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment BY RECORDICEEPING Rev 06-95 Air Pollution Control Division Recordkeeping may be acceptable as a compliance demonstration method provided that a correlation between the parameter value recorded and the emission rate of a particular pollutant is established in the form of a curve or chart of emission rate versus parameter values. This correlation may constitute the certification of the system. For an existing program, the correlation demonstration must be attached for Division consideration for approval. If the correlation information has not yet been developed, please submit it within 60 days of the startup of the system. SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: NA 4. Unit identification code: P009 5. Pollutant(s) being monitored: VOC 6. Material or parameter being monitored and recorded: Monobutyltintrichloride (MBTT) consumption 7. Method of monitoring and recording (see information on back of this page): MBTT consumption in the HEST hoods is recorded. 8. List any EPA methods used: NA 9. Is this an existing method of demonstrating compliance? X Yes ❑ No 11. Backup system: NA 10. Start date: 8/11/2005 12 a. Data collection frequency: Cl Daily ❑ Weekly X Monthly Li Batch (not to exceed monthly) O Other - specify 12 b. Compliance shall be demonstrated: ❑ Daily O Weekly ❑ Monthly ❑ Batch (not to exceed monthly) X Other - specify Annually 13. Quality Control/Quality Assurance: The monitoring system shall be subject to appropriate performance specifications, calibration requirements, and glality assurance procedures. o A quality assurance/quality control plan for the recordkeeping system is attached for Division review. X The plan is not attached, but will be submitted to the Division by 10/1/2006 . 14. ❑ A proposed format for the compliance certification report and excess emission report h attached. ***** The compliance records shall be available for Division inspection. The source shall record any malfunction that causes or may cause an emission limit to be exceeded. Malfunctions shall be reported to the Division the next business day. Hazardous air releases shall be reported to the Division immediately. ***a* U Operating Permit Application COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION FORM 2000-507 Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment BY RECORDKEEPING Rev 06-95 Air Pollution Control Division Recordkeeping may be acceptable as a compliance demonstration method presided that a correlation between the parameter value recorded and the emission rat of a particular pollutant is established in the form of a curve or chart of emission rate versus parameter values. This correlation may constitute the certification of the system. For an existing program, the correlation demonstration must be attached for Division consideration for approval. If the correlation information has not yet been developed, please submit it within 60 days of the startup of the system. SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: S003 4. Unit identification code: P011 5. Pollutant(s) being monitored: NOx, SO2, PM, CO, VOC 6. Material or parameter being monitored and recorded: Hours of engine operation 7. Method of monitoring and recording (see information on back of this page): Engine operating hours are recorded 8. List any EPA methods used: NA 9. Is this an existing method of demonstrating compliance? X Yes ❑ No 11. Backup system: NA 10. Start date: 8/11/2005 12 a. Data collection frequency: ❑ Daily ❑ Weekly X Monthly 12 b. Compliance shall be demonstrated: ❑ Daily Li Weekly 7 Monthly ❑ Batch (not to exceed monthly) ❑ Batch (not to exceed monthly) ❑ Other - specify x Other - specify Annually 13. Quality Control/Quality Assurance: The monitoring system shall be subject to appropriate performance specifications, calibration requirements, and grality assurance procedures. ❑ A quality assurance/quality control plan for the recordkeeping system is attached for Division review. x The plan is not attached, but will be submitted to the Division by 10/1/2006 . 14. 0 A proposed format for the compliance certification report and excess emission reports attached. ***** The compliance records shall be available for Division inspection. The source shall record any malfunction that causes or may cause an emission limit to be exceeded. Malfunctions shall be reported to the Division the next business day. Hazardous air releases shall be reported to the Division immediately. ****k Operating Permit Application COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION FORM 2000-507 Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment BY RECORDICEEPING Rev 06-95 Air Pollution Control Division Recordkeeping may be acceptable as a compliance demonstration method provided that a correlation between the parameter value recorded and the emission rate of a particular pollutant is established in the form of a curve or chart of emission rate versus parameter values. This correlation may constitute the certification of the system. For an existing program, the correlation demonstration must be attached for Division consideration for approval. If the correlation information has not yet been developed, please submit it within 60 days of the startup of the system. SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE I . Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: S004 4. Unit identification code: P012 5. Pollutant(s) being monitored: NOx, 8O2, PM, CO, VOC 6. Material or parameter being monitored and recorded: flours of engine operation 7. Method of monitoring and recording (see information on back of this page): Engine operating hours are recorded 8. List any EPA methods used: NA 9. Is this an existing method of demonstrating compliance? X Yes ❑ No 11. Backup system: NA 10. Start date: 8/11/2005 12 a. Data collection frequency: ❑ Daily ❑ Weekly x Monthly 12 b. Compliance shall be demonstrated: ❑ Daily ❑ Weekly ❑ Monthly ❑ Batch (not to exceed monthly) ❑ Batch (not to exceed monthly) ❑ Other - specify X Other - specify Annually 13. Quality Control/Quality Assurance: The monitoring system shall be subject to appropriate performance specifications, calibration requirements, and gtality assurance procedures. ❑ A quality assurance/quality control plan for the recordkeeping system is attached for Division review. X The plan is not attached, but will be submitted to the Division by 10/1/2006 . 14. ❑ A proposed format for the compliance certification report and excess emission report E attached. ***** The compliance records shall be available for Division inspection. The source shall record any malfunction that causes or may cause an emission limit to be exceeded. Malfunctions shall be reported to the Division the next business day. Hazardous air releases shall be reported to the Division immediately. ***rd: Operating Permit Application COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION FORM 2000-507 Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment BY RECORDICEEPING Rev 06-95 Air Pollution Control Division Recordkeeping may be acceptable as a compliance demonstration method prodded that a correlation between the parameter value recorded and the emission rate of a particular pollutant is established in the form of a curve or chart of emission rate versus parameter values. This correlation may constitute the certification of the system. For an existing program, the correlation demonstration must he attached for Division consideration for approval. If the correlation information has not yet been developed, please submit it within 60 days of the startup of the system. SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: NA 4. Unit identification code: P015 5. Pollutant(s) being monitored: VOC 6. Material or parameter being monitored and recorded: Ink and Solvent Consumption 7. Method of monitoring and recording (see information on back of this page): Consumption of ink and solvent consumed in the carton printing operation in recorded. Records of actual materials used and Material Safety Data Sheets are also kept. 8. List any EPA methods used: NA 9. Is this an existing method of demonstrating compliance? xYes Li No 11. Backup system: NA 10. Start date: 8/11/2005 12 a. Data collection frequency: ❑ Daily ❑ Weekly X Monthly a Batch (not to exceed monthly) ❑ Other - specify 12 b. Compliance shall be demonstrated: LI Daily IT Weekly Cl Monthly ❑ Batch (not to exceed monthly) X Other - specify Annually 13. Quality Control/Quality Assurance: The monitoring system shall be subject to appropriate performance specifications, calibration requirements, and giality assurance procedures. ❑ A quality assurance/quality control plan for the recordkeeping system is attached for Division review. X The plan is not attached, but will be submitted to the Division by 10/1/2006 . 14. ❑ A proposed format for the compliance certification report and excess emission reports attached. ***** The compliance records shall be available for Division inspection. The source shall record any malfunction that causes or may cause an emission limit to be exceeded Malfunctions shall be reported to the Division the next business day. Hazardous air releases shall be reported to the Division immediately. Operating Permit Application COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION FORM 2000-507 Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment BY RECORDICEEPING Rev 06-95 Air Pollution Control Division Recordkeeping may be acceptable as a compliance demonstration method provided that a correlation between the parameter value recorded and the emission rate of a particular pollutant is established in the form of a curve or chart of emission rate versus parameter values. This correlation may constitute the certification of the system. For an existing program, the correlation demonstration must be attached for Division consideration for approval. If the correlation information has not yet been developed, please submit it within 60 days of the startup of the system. SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: Fugitive 4. Unit identification code: P021 5. Pollutant(s) being monitored: PM 6. Material or parameter being monitored and recorded: Material throughput 7. Method of monitoring and recording (see information on back of this page): Raw material throughput is recorded. 8. List any EPA methods used: NA 9. Is this an existing method of demonstrating compliance? XYes ❑No 11. Backup system: NA 10. Start date: 8/11/2005 12 a. Data collection frequency: ❑ Daily LI Weekly X Monthly 0 Batch (not to exceed monthly) 0 Other - specify 12 b. Compliance shall be demonstrated: ❑ Daily 0 Weekly ❑ Monthly ❑ Batch (not to exceed monthly) X Other - specify Annually 13. Quality Control/Quality Assurance: The monitoring system shall be subject to appropriate performance specifications, calibration requirements, and giality assurance procedures. ❑ A quality assurance/quality control plan for the recordkeeping system is attached for Division review. X The plan is not attached, but will be submitted to the Division by 10/1/2006 . 14. ❑ A proposed format for the compliance certification report and excess emission reports attached. The compliance records shall be available for Division inspection. The source shall record any malfunction that causes or may cause an emission limit to be exceeded, ***** Malfunctions shall be reported to the Division the next business day. Hazardous air releases shall be reported to the Division immediately. Operating Permit Application Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION BY OTHER METHODS FORM 2000-508 Rev 06-95 1. Facility Name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container, Inc 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: NA 4. Unit Identification code: P019 5. Pollutant(s) or Parameter(s) being monitored: Particulate Matter 6. Description of the method of monitoring: Equipment will be maintained in accordance with Air Emission Operating And Maintenance Plan (Attached) 7. Compliance shall be demonstrated: (Specify the frequency with which compliance will be demonstrated) Equipment will be maintained in accordance with Air Emission Operating And Maintenance Plan (Attached) Operating Permit Application COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION FORM 2000-508 Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment BY OTHER METHODS Rev 06-95 Air Pollution Control Division 1. Facility Name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container, Inc 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: NA 4. Unit Identification code: P020 5. Pollutant(s) or Parameter(s) being monitored: Particulate Matter 6. Description of the method of monitoring: Equipment will be maintained in accordance with Air Emission Operating And Maintenance Plan (Attached) 7. Compliance shall be demonstrated: (Specify the frequency with which compliance will be demonstrated) Equipment will be maintained in accordance with Air Emission Operating And Maintenance Plan (Attached) Operating Permit Application EMISSION UNIT HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE FORM 2000-600 Rev 06-95 I . Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: S001 4. Unit identification code: P001 5. Unit material description: Natural Gas 6. Complete the following summary of hazardous air emissions from this unit. Attach all calculations and emissim factor references. Attached X Actual Emissions Data is for calendar year 19 Pollutant CAS Common or Generic Pollutant Name Actual emissions Allowable OR Potential to emit Quantity Measurement Units Quantity Measurement Units 110-54-3 Hexane 0.45 TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY NOTE: If there is a permit for this unit, the permit limits are the same as the potential to emit. Operating Permit Application EMISSION UNIT HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE FORM 2000-600 Rev 06-95 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: S002 4. Unit identification code: P002 5. Unit material description: Natural Gas 6. Complete the following summary of hazardous air emissions from this unit. Attach all calculations and emissim factor references. Attached Actual Emissions Data is for calendar year 19 Pollutant CAS Common or Generic Pollutant Name Actual emissions Allowable OR Potential to emit Quantity Measurement Units Quantity Measurement Units 110-54-3 Hexane 0.45 TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY NOTE: If there is a permit for this unit, the permit limits are the same as the potential to emit. Operating Permit Application EMISSION UNIT HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE FORM 2000-600 Rev 06-95 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: NA 4. Unit identification code: P003 5. Unit material description: Natural Gas 6. Complete the following sununary of hazardous air emissions from this unit. Attach all calculations and emission factor references. Attached x Actual Emissions Data is for calendar year 19 Pollutant CAS Common or Generic Pollutant Name Actual emissions Allowable OR Potential to emit Quantity Measurement Units Quantity Measurement Units 110-54-3 Hexane 0.04 TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY NOTE: If there is a permit for this unit, the permit limits are the same as the potential to emit. Operating Permit Application EMISSION UNIT HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE FORM 2000-600 Rev 06-95 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: NA 4. Unit identification code: P006 5. Unit material description: Natural Gas 6. Complete the following summary of hazardous air emissions from this unit. Attach all calculations and emissim factor references. Attached X Actual Emissions Data is for calendar year 19 Pollutant CAS Common or Generic Pollutant Name Actual emissions Allowable OR Potential to emit Quantity Measurement Units Quantity Measurement Units 110-54-3 Hexane 0.06 TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY NOTE: If there is a permit for this unit, the permit limits are the same as the potential to emit. Operating Permit Application EMISSION UNIT HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE FORM 2000-600 Rev 06-95 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: NA 4, Unit identification code: P009 5. Unit material description: Mombutyltin Trichloride 6. Complete the following summary of hazardous air emissions from this unit. Attach all calculations and emissiat factor references. Attached X Actual Emissions Data is for calendar year 19 Pollutant CAS Common or Generic Pollutant Name Actual emissions Allowable OR Potential to emit Quantity Measurement Units Quantity Measurement Units 7647-01-0 Hydrochloric Acid 4.08 TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TP Y TPY NOTE: If there is a permit for this unit, the permit limits are the same as the potential to emit. Operating Permit Application EMISSION UNIT HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE FORM 2000-600 Rev 06-95 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: NA 4. Unit identification code: P015 5. Unit material description: Carton Printing Ink 6. Complete the following summary of hazardous air emissions from this unit. Attach all calculations and emission factor references. Attached x Actual Emissions Data is for calendar year 19 Pollutant CAS Common or Generic Pollutant Name Actual emissions Allowable OR Potential to emit Quantity Measurement Units Quantity Measurement Units Various Glycol Ethers 5.45 TPY 7440-47-3 Chromium 0.03 TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY NOTE: If there is a permit for this unit, the permit limits are the same as the potential to emit. C R a w C >- 0 ✓ z ow Z Z 6z z0 R"' N • W O O — Na • W J J O 2 ' ▪ ? F ce 03 W 2 W 3a Lu O z I- 0 a Annual Emission Rates blyear) (d%H) va4731oaA1`J IdvH) N]W IdVHI InucylaW 611/1-0 0000010S (dVH) IaMa!N IdtlHl Mncumg (dtlH) asomOcual lea/H1140300. IdtlHl Wnlwnryp IdvH) mnpupEQ IdtlH) WngINag (dtlH) 'Navy IdVHI auazuagwolga!q-d (dVH) ouunlni (dvi)aua]eglgdeN (dtlH) edezaH IdYH) aPA4aple W and Idvi) 012azua9 (OM) P!3V alenlyemlPFH ¢ U U ¢ O W <0 d0 ¢0 400 ¢ <6. ¢ 0 W n V o <2 4 N 0 0 N 0 0 0 b co H 1.055 37.6/9 0 0 00 M 0 00 Nro 00 wN N OO 00 mm mm 0O h n 00 00 o 22 0 0 WO g 4N n6 6 66 N 0 a co K E z E 2 N W W 0 " N EiE 00 0 C C Co batch house dust collector - ¢ O a is 14 t as s cogzg n 'a `mya C $ = u C w n ° g2 0442 c"9 f s v E E N z 13aene 0 Y N Total (HAP lb/year) Owens-Illinois, Inc. �1- Operating Permit Application EMISSION UNIT CRITERIA AIR POLLUTANTS Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE FORM 2000-601 09-94 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: S001,5002 4. Unit identification code: P001, P002 (Combined Emissions) 5. Complete the following emissions summary for the following pollutants. Attach all calculations and emission factor references. Attached x Air pollutant Actual Potential to emit Maximum allowable Quantity U TPY U TPY Particulates (TSP) 31.4 TPY 0.2 8 31.4 PM -10 31.4 TPY 0.2 8 31.4 Nitrogen oxides 194.6 TPY 194.6 Volatile organic compounds 31.4 TPY 31.4 Carbon monoxide 31.4 TPY 31.4 Lead .0001 TPY Sulfur dioxide 125.6 TPY 125.6 Total reduced sulfur TPY Reduced sulfur compounds TPY Hydrogen sulfide TPY Sulfuric Acid Mist TPY Fluorides TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY Units (U) should be entered as follows: 1 = lb/hr 2 = lb/mmBTU 3 = grains/dscf 4 = lb/ gallon 5 = ppmdv 6 = gram/HP-hour 7 = Ib/mmscf 8 = lb/ton glass produced 9 = other (specify) 10 = other Ispecifyl Operating Permit Application EMISSION UNIT CRITERIA AIR POLLUTANTS Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE FORM 2000-601 09-94 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: NA 4. Unit identification code: P003 5. Complete the following emissions summary for the following pollutants. Attach all calculations and emission factor references. Attached x Air pollutant Actual Potential to emit Maximum allowable Quantity U TRY U TPY Particulates (TSP) 0 .35 TPY 0.2 8 0.35 PM -10 0.35 TPY 0.35 Nitrogen oxides 4. 63 TPY 4. 63 Volatile organic compounds 0.25 TPY 0.25 Carbon monoxide 3 . 89 TPY 3 . 89 Lead TPY Sulfur dioxide 0 . 03 TPY 0 . 03 Total reduced sulfur TPY Reduced sulfur compounds TPY Hydrogen sulfide TPY Sulfuric Acid Mist TPY Fluorides TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY Units (U) should be entered as follows: 1 = lb/hr 2 = lb/mmBTU 3 = grains/dscf 4 = lb/ gallon 5 = ppmdv 6 = gram/HP-hour 7 = lb/mmscf 8 = lb/ton glass produced 9 = other (specify) 10 = other (specify) Operating Permit Application EMISSION UNIT CRITERIA AIR POLLUTANTS FORM 2000-601 Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE 09-94 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: NA 4. Unit identification code: P006 5. Complete the following emissions summary for the following pollutants. Attach all calculations and emission factor references. Attached x Air pollutant Actual Potential to emit Maximum allowable Quantity U TPY U TPY Particulates (TSP) 1.07 TPY 1. 07 PM -10 1.07 TPY 1.07 Nitrogen oxides 14 . 02 TPY 14 . 02 Volatile organic compounds 0 . 77 TPY 0 . 77 Carbon monoxide 11.77 TPY 11 . 77 Lead TPY Sulfur dioxide 0 . 08 TPY 0 . 08 Total reduced sulfur TPY Reduced sulfur compounds TPY Hydrogen sulfide TPY Sulfuric Acid Mist TPY Fluorides TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY Units (U) should be entered as follows: 1 = lb/hr 2 = lb/mmBTU 3 = grains/dscf 4 = lb/ gallon 5 = ppmdv 6 = gram/HP-hour 7 = Ib/mmscf 8 = lb/ton glass produced 9 = other (specify) 10 = other (specify) Operating Permit Application EMISSION UNIT CRITERIA AIR POLLUTANTS Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE FORM 2000-601 09-94 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: NA 4. Unit identification code: P008 5. Complete the following emissions summary for the following pollutants. Attach all calculations and emission factor references. Attached x Air pollutant Actual Potential to emit Maximum allowable Quantity U TPY U TPY Particulates (TSP) 24.33 TPY 24 .33 PM -10 1.91 TPY 1.91 Nitrogen oxides . 0.03 TPY 0.03 Volatile organic compounds 1 . 93 TPY 1 . 93 Carbon monoxide 1. 07 TPY 1 . 07 Lead TPY Sulfur dioxide 5.56 TPY 5.56 Total reduced sulfur TPY Reduced sulfur compounds TPY Hydrogen sulfide TPY Sulfuric Acid Mist TPY Fluorides TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY Units (U) should be entered as follows: 1 = lb/hr 2 = Ib/mmBTU 3 = grains/dscf 4 = lb/ gallon 5 = ppmdv 6 = gram/HP-hour 7 = lb/mmscf 8 = lb/ton glass produced 9 = other (specify) 10 = other (specify) Operating Permit Application EMISSION UNIT CRITERIA AIR POLLUTANTS Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE FORM 2000-601 09-94 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: NA 4. Unit identification code: P009 5. Complete the following emissions summary for the following pollutants. Attach all calculations and emission factor references. Attached x Air pollutant Actua Potential to emit Maximum allowable Quantity U TPY U TPY Particulates (TSP) TPY PM -10 TPY Nitrogen oxides TPY Volatile organic compounds 24 . 53 TPY 24 . 53 Carbon monoxide TPY Lead TPY Sulfur dioxide TPY Total reduced sulfur TPY Reduced sulfur compounds TPY Hydrogen sulfide TPY Sulfuric Acid Mist TPY Fluorides TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY Units (U) should be entered as follows: 1 = lb/hr 2 = lb/mmBTU 3 = grains/dscf 4 = lb/ gallon 5 = ppmdv 6 = gram/HP-hour 7 = Ib/mmscf 8 = lb/ton glass produced 9 = other (specify) 10 = other (specify) Operating Permit Application EMISSION UNIT CRITERIA AIR POLLUTANTS Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE FORM 2000-601 09-94 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: 5003 4. Unit identification code: P011 5. Complete the following emissions summary for the following pollutants. Attach all calculations and emission factor references. Attached x Air pollutant Actual Potential to emit Maximum allowable Quantity U TPY U TPY Particulates (TSP) 0.22 TPY 0.22 PM -10 0.22 TPY 0.22 Nitrogen oxides 3.45 TPY 3.45 Volatile organic compounds 0.03 TPY 0.03 Carbon monoxide 0.12 TPY 0.12 Lead TPY Sulfur dioxide 0.41 TPY 0.41 Total reduced sulfur TPY Reduced sulfur compounds TPY Hydrogen sulfide TPY Sulfuric Acid Mist TPY Fluorides TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY Units (U) should be entered as follows; 1 = lb/hr 2 = Ib/mmBTU 3 = grains/dscf 4 = lb/ gallon 5 = ppmdv 6 = gram/HP-hour 7 = lb/mmscf 8 = lb/ton glass produced 9 = other (specify) 10 = other (specify) Operating Permit Application EMISSION UNIT CRITERIA AIR POLLUTANTS Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE FORM 2000-601 09-94 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: S004 4. Unit identification code: P012 5. Complete the following emissions summary for the following pollutants. Attach all calculations and emission factor references. Attached x Air pollutant Actual Potential to emit Maximum allowable Quantity U TPY U TPY Particulates (TSP) 0.22 TPY 0.22 PM -10 0.22 TPY 0.22 Nitrogen oxides 3.45 TPY 3 .45 Volatile organic compounds 0.03 TPY 0.03 Carbon monoxide 0.12 TPY 0.12 Lead TPY Sulfur dioxide 0.41 TPY 0.41 Total reduced sulfur TPY Reduced sulfur compounds TPY Hydrogen sulfide TPY Sulfuric Acid Mist TPY Fluorides TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY Units (U) should be entered as follows: 1 = lb/hr 2 = Ib/mmnTU 3 = grains/dscf 4 = lb/ gallon 5 = ppmdv 6 = gram/HP-hour 7 = lb/mmscf 8 = Ib/ton glass produced 9 = other (specify) 10 = other (specify) Operating Permit Application EMISSION UNIT CRITERIA AIR POLLUTANTS FORM 2000-601 Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE 09-94 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: NA 4. Unit identification code: P015 5. Complete the following emissions summary for the following pollutants. Attach all calculations and emission factor references. Attached x Air pollutant Actual Potential to emit Maximum allowable Quantity U TPY U TPY Particulates (TSP) TPY PM -10 TPY Nitrogen oxides TPY Volatile organic compounds 9 . 81 TPY 9. 81 Carbon monoxide TPY Lead TPY Sulfur dioxide TPY Total reduced sulfur TPY Reduced sulfur compounds TPY Hydrogen sulfide TPY Sulfuric Acid Mist TPY Fluorides TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY Units (U) should be entered as follows: 1 = lb/hr 2 = Ib/mmBTU 3 = grains/dscf 4 = lb/ gallon 5 = ppmdv 6 = gram/HP-hour 7 = Ib/mmscf 8 = lb/ton glass produced 9 = other (specify) 10 = other (specify) Operating Permit Application EMISSION UNIT CRITERIA AIR POLLUTANTS Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE FORM 2000-601 09-94 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: NA 4. Unit identification code: P018 5. Complete the following emissions summary for the following pollutants. Attach all calculations and emission factor references. Attached x Air pollutant Actual Potential to emit Maximum allowable Quantity U TPY U TPY Particulates (TSP) 12.48 TPY 12 .48 PM -10 12.48 TPY 12.48 Nitrogen oxides TPY Volatile organic compounds TPY Carbon monoxide TPY Lead TPY Sulfur dioxide TPY Total reduced sulfur TPY Reduced sulfur compounds TPY Hydrogen sulfide TPY Sulfuric Acid Mist TPY Fluorides TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY Units (U) should be entered as follows: = lb/hr 2 = lb/mmBTU 3 = grains/dscf 4 = lb/ gallon 5 = ppmdv 6 = gram/HP-hour 7 = Ib/mmscf 8 = lb/ton glass produced 9 = other (specify) 10 = other (specify) Operating Permit Application EMISSION UNIT CRITERIA AIR POLLUTANTS Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE FORM 2000-601 09-94 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: NA 4. Unit identification code: P019 5. Complete the following emissions summary for the following pollutants. Attach all calculations and emission factor references. Attached x Air pollutant Actual Potential to emit Maximum allowable Quantity U TPY U TPY Particulates (TSP) 3 .57 TPY 3.57 PM -10 3.57 TPY 3.57 Nitrogen oxides TPY Volatile organic compounds TPY Carbon monoxide TPY Lead TPY Sulfur dioxide TPY Total reduced sulfur TPY Reduced sulfur compounds TPY Hydrogen sulfide TPY Sulfuric Acid Mist TPY Fluorides TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY Units (U) should be entered as follows: 1 = lb/hr 2 = lb/mmBTU 3 = grains/dscf 4 = lb/ gallon 5 = ppmdv 6 = gram/HP-hour 7 = lb/mmscf 8 = lb/ton glass produced 9 = other (specify) 10 = other (specify) Operating Permit Application EMISSION UNIT CRITERIA AIR POLLUTANTS Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE FORM 2000-601 09-94 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: NA 4. Unit identification code: P020 5. Complete the following emissions summary for the following pollutants. Attach all calculations and emission factor references. Attached x Air pollutant Actual Potential to emit Maximum allowable Quantity U TPY U TPY Particulates (TSP) 1 . 77 TPY 1 . 77 PM -10 1.77 TPY 1.77 Nitrogen oxides TPY Volatile organic compounds TPY Carbon monoxide TPY Lead TPY Sulfur dioxide TPY Total reduced sulfur TPY Reduced sulfur compounds TPY Hydrogen sulfide TPY Sulfuric Acid Mist TPY Fluorides TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY Units (U) should be entered as follows: 1 = lb/hr 2 = Ib/mm6TU 3 = grains/dscf 4 = lb/ gallon 5 = ppmdv 6 = gram/HP-hour 7 = Ib/mmscf 8 = Ib/ton glass produced 9 = other (specify) 10 = other (specify) Operating Permit Application EMISSION UNIT CRITERIA AIR POLLUTANTS FORM 2000-601 Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE 09-94 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: NA 4. Unit identification code: P021 5. Complete the following emissions summary for the following pollutants. Attach all calculations and emission factor references. Attached x Air pollutant Actual Potential to emit Maximum allowable Quantity U TPY U TPY Particulates (TSP) 48.57 TPY 48 . 57 PM -10 10.66 TPY 10.66 Nitrogen oxides TPY Volatile organic compounds TPY Carbon monoxide TPY Lead TPY Sulfur dioxide TPY Total reduced sulfur TPY Reduced sulfur compounds TPY Hydrogen sulfide TPY Sulfuric Acid Mist TPY Fluorides TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY Units (U) should be entered as follows: 1 = Ib/hr 2 = lb/mmBTU 3 = grains/dscf 4 = lb/ gallon 5 = ppmdv 6 = gram/HP-hour 7 = lb/mmscf 8 = lb/ton glass produced 9 = other (specify) 10 = other (specify) a.r. oK 2 U 2 W 2y F N UQ I w go 4zz 0• - re 2F W O F 2 fl 1.5 u: S e e S 0 V W e III t 5 Ai opp!rye 8 iiii:iiiiiiiiii F esti YW 5 i 9�s' Ri:iiii:ii m e 2 y N s f a gY¢Y, ICI10' R' I 7.5 1.0652 I ].1 1.0652 f o.6 0.0641 Rah PM, PM, RO.. SO. VOC. CO and P0, pre AP-12SEdniora VOL 1. Clleplet 14 Table 144 (JWRBI g fig'. aF T c e� i2SWW x G aaEaE: o:$'q'Ea Q�N 9ana,'? 'c i P 6¢¢ t!t ,'i u e„59a' ��f.> a •F cr,` a b - �S� _. ^,.0.0 y -.n a �E Rol. SO, is based on aslYbli '.15 in Rue ducthee AHnrhrnOrR) Pait NO,. VOL Inn CO EF. are bused an.ndepvlppM anelytia lees AR4rnmmnl ::a'W .$ y°e °gym eTHci 0pY e.�=ei b�� I5S a A I. 101941 I TIN W P1 *I usage ie 100 MaRmongA Double typical far anumad metim0m. Assure 100% VOC Ima le eve0 a_ x� il 13�q °WW5oa aa^ o*c ^ems f�Yx Rev PMIPMrn r 6 dit.cn, Vet. 1. CM1aptar 12.4, Tale 13.41 [JlK e61 2 ]420 aurm e.1ed I O.Op, ]8027 1 0.005 ]1152 Ref: Menu? ecurn'atneding 021101guannma I e e a- - 'n 7 ae i0 as Ei-s £5F eZo.r.o 7 Rot, Manufacturer's emission loadings Rat PM. PMle. 5O,_ and CO f.F_ 21.100',‘ le70 F u _ Ref. PMNM,e par AP -125a Edlnoy Vm. t. Cheleir 114. T.M. 13,aA(.h&00) lb/103 wl I 0015 14966 10.65P 24966 iw V w aue 'Wujl ° W Mini F g YP SSE 5 _ '° j4 e2:� F °_g Wk Hg m f CC®W• gLii K °n �,_ �ao> 92�c �`4 {;ec�_Ei g ¢K°i Sc _w< n nd uu $ duo g a� C eW S 5$ 3^Ycn 2 4. -etK . i 1 e q e G S` a °i �fi e ' t 7F•N k k k 9 n a y E q i .E 3 _ ^ F L`! L 9 5 c S a 8 - 8 r. oW d uC J W u it; e i. [ V Sea Atmwnsnt dies 2003-I0•10 'Re1: PMNM1per AP -12 Aggregate eleeMings Stops Piles. n^£ytten. Vol 1.C er111-lxsnh51 1 FE (PM) ,tore h= 0.14; U = EN mph: M •2.eu Emission flpi • FE 0Cappdry A I!GEM11001 I It 9 7•SE: a g4 `�s zEu .fie n se 5' 2 • 9 b 8 m— 7.• E _I" 111111' 5n.s '3. u q nin o �o ee a .L,Sj _II E a Were 001itory (So NAWeerNn*M1 *Meth.) osto Ist en The meat Irn$n is eppran 1.00 milt. c e x r R 9 Ige1: PMRM 0 per AT{Z Aggregate H 14',9 A Slangs Piles. r Edition. Val. 1.0 IPM whera6=0)1: II=5A5 mpit:Ms 9.1% I •PM Emission =E.F, f Mm. Annum: Vn[ASNnp Rata 5II • Mp•.° E1hsen[y) PM Emlf ian a 0.19151hhnns ]9p1]6 hays II -90M.j .1.40-62 Spy 3 1ao " _a =e`€,0. '`he" la �?e Ea €., [�EJ v oGg_ '. H PM where k =0.]41 U =0.06 Mplf'. M.0.1% PM Emission =ES. s Max. Annual Ohl or6ng Rate i ll . Capha. Eftlsncvj PM Em»Yan=0.2015(Itan F 139.356$Y f II -80%I a1.e0Tl my 90!4 is mama:tag for utilizing:A containment rings &sing wJoaS .3�mnofty, ltd Pale op !i.:jIb a' e%.. 3 sar �E9E E �fx5. a' L�'₹ .�;;% Ea ::W��sE •� a a'�Cp ._ei a?�S E of nS :€E a a 'cl s w ;`e ag 'e e p e Senn Z``4§`� a Illi FUFc !"- ay 3— .. Ran metensl PAIirpry h.:co: on The MIA ledgt it eIproa d It miles % ze ! k' Yeu.;" 2w^w 'miii£ �;q i3.`�� '�2 _a°gW= _pnp Fnaui q m zw— '$n E $ �ry n�'ti pEXxn eA e - 4. •. 1 e e a s . j� 35 y i I 2`�`6°- CE 8 o e iP T' u� a e 's a c 8 ! t ti ! !el EF. C.ER I EF. GEN. p9I) {IFYI [\ }} | ,9! Rut PMFM. Px £PJR Not, R tveyR Se' Edition. Vol. f. Own 113-1. EqueSon i tO Su21 PM whore F • 0.032: f.L • en eEore ulei: VI e Se tone. P • e] days; soil P • $65 dn. .. a.. /_// P. *!t °!!i ii 14 "| I{ ,9I 1 l= . !//\ TOTAL (Fu,Ifi/e Sow .) l d TOTAL Iaatd Fup]re Scoecea) g ! / Operating Permit Application PLANT -WIDE HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE FORM 2000-602 Rev 06-95 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Complete the following emissions summary for all hazardous air emissions at this facility. Calculations attached. Attach a copy of all calculations to this form. Attached X Pollutant CAS Common or Generic Pollutant Name Actual emissions Allowable OR Potential to emit Quantity Units Quantity Units 7647-01-0 Hydrochloric Acid 4.08 TPY 50-00-0 Formaldehyde 0.05 TPY 110-54-3 Hexane 1.22 TPY 7440-47-3 Chromium 0.03 TPY Various Glycol Ethers 5.45 TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY TPY NOTE: If there is a permit for this unit, the permit limits are the same as the potential to emit. Operating Permit Application Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE PLANT -WIDE CRITERIA AIR POLLUTANTS FORM 2000-603 09-94 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container, Inc. 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Complete the following emissions summary for the listed emissions at this facility. Air pollutant Actual Potential to Maximum allowable emit TPY TPY TPY Particulates (TSP) 162 .81 162 . 81 PM -10 102.5` 102.51 Nitrogen oxides 2 2 0. 6 2 2 0. 6 Volatile organic compounds 68.7 68.7 Carbon monoxide 4 8. 7 4 8. 7 Lead 0 0 Sulfur dioxide 13 2 . 1 132 . 1 Total reduced sulfur Reduced sulfur compounds Hydrogen sulfide Sulfuric acid mist Fluorides 1Includes 48.47 tons of fugitive emissions 2 Includes 10.61 tons of fugitive emissions t Operating Permit Application Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS AND STATUS OF EMISSION UNIT FORM 2000-604 Rev 06-95 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: S001 4. Unit identification code: P001 5. Pollutant 6. Colorado Air Quality Regulations or Construction Permit Number 7. State Only 8. Limitation 9. Compliance Status IN OUT PM and PM10 Reg 3, Part B, III.A.4 31.4 Tons/year X Particulate Matter Reg 6, Part A, Subpart CC of 40CFR60 0.2 lb/ton glass produced X NOx Reg II B (PSD) 194.6 tons/year (combined P001 & P002) X Sulfur Dioxide Reg II B (PSD), Reg 1, VI B. 125.6 tons/year (combined Pool & P002) X Opacity Reg I, Sec II.A.1&4 20% (30% as noted in reg) X 10. Other requirements (e.g., malfunction reporting, special operating conditions from an existing permit such as material usage, hours of operation, etc.) State Only Compliance S atus IN OUT Glass Production shall not exceed 26,158 tons/month and 313,900 tons/year (P001&P002 combined) x P001 shall be equipped with continuous emission monitors for NOx and SO2 X Compliance test using EPA methods 5 and 202 shall be conducted to show compliance with Particulate Matter emission rates X Furnace shall be vented to electrostatic precipitator and dry scrubber except during periods of startup, shutdown, and maintenance X **** USE FORM 2000-700 TO EXPLAIN HOW COMPLIANCE Operating Permit Application Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS AND STATUS OF EMISSION UNIT FORM 2000-604 Rev 06-95 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: 5002 4. Unit identification code: P002 5. Pollutant 6. Colorado Air Quality Regulations or Construction Permit Number 7. State Only 8. Limitation 9. Compliance Status IN OUT PM and PM10 Reg 3, Part B, III.A.4 31.4 Tons/year X Particulate Matter Reg 6,Part A,Subpart CC of 40CFR60 0.2 lb/ton glass produced X NOx Reg II B (PSD) 194.6 tons/year (combined P001 & P002) X Sulfur Dioxide Reg II B (PSD), Reg 1, VI B. 125.6 tons/year (combined Pool & P002) X Opacity Reg I, Sec II.A.1&4 20% (30% as noted in reg) X 10. Other requirements (e.g., malfunction reporting, special operating conditions from an existing permit such as material usage, hours of operation, etc.) State Only Compliance Status IN OUT Glass Production shall not exceed 26,158 tons/month and 313,900 tons/year (P001&P002 combined) X P001 shall be equipped with continuous emission monitors for NOx and SO2 X Compliance test using EPA methods 5 and 202 shall be conducted to show compliance with Particulate Matter emission rates X Furnace shall be vented to electrostatic precipitator and dry scrubber except during periods of startup, shutdown, and maintenance X **** USE FORM 2000-700 TO EXPLAIN 11OW COMPLIANCE Operating Permit Application Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS AND STATUS OF EMISSION UNIT FORM 2000-604 Rev 06-95 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: S003 4. Unit identification code: P003 5. Pollutant 6. Colorado Air Quality Regulations or Construction Permit Number 7. State Only 8. Limitation 9. Compliance Status IN OUT NA NA NA 10. Other requirements (e.g., malfunction reporting, special operating conditions from an existing permit such as material usage, hours of operation, etc.) State Only Compliance Status IN OUT NA **** USE FORM 2000-700 TO EXPLAIN 11OW COMPLIANCE WAS DETERMINED FOR EACH APPLICABLE REQUIREMENT**** Operating Permit Application Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS AND STATUS OF EMISSION UNIT FORM 2000-604 Rev 06-95 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: NA 4. Unit identification code: P006 5. Pollutant 6. Colorado Air Quality Regulations or Construction Permit Number 7. State Only 8. Limitation 9. Compliance Status IN OUT 10. Other requirements (e.g., malfunction reporting, special operating conditions from an existing permit such as material usage, hours of operation, etc.) State Only Compliance S atus IN OUT **** USE FORM 2000-700 TO EXPLAIN HOW COMPLIANCE WAS DETERMINED FOR EACH APPLICABLE REQUIREMENT**** Operating Permit Application Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS AND STATUS OF EMISSION UNIT FORM 2000-604 Rev 06-95 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: NA 4. Unit identification code: P008 5. Pollutant 6. Colorado Air Quality Regulations or Construction Permit Number 7. State Only 8. Limitation 9. Compliance Status IN OUT Opacity Reg I, Sec II.A.1&4 20% (30% as noted in reg) X 10. Other requirements (e.g., malfunction reporting, special operating conditions from an existing permit such as material usage, hours of operation, etc.) State Only Compliance S atus IN OUT Consumption of Mould Lubricant at the forming machines shall not exceed 1113 gallons per month and 13,350 gallons per year. X **** USE FORM 2000-700 TO EXPLAIN HOW COMPLIANCE WAS DETERMINED FOR EACH APPLICABLE REQUIREMENT**** Operating Permit Application Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS AND STATUS OF EMISSION UNIT FORM 2000-604 Rev 06-95 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: NA 4. Unit identification code: P009 5. Pollutant 6. Colorado Air Quality Regulations or Construction Permit Number 7. State Only 8. Limitation 9. Compliance Status IN OUT 10. Other requirements (e.g., malfunction reporting, special operating conditions from an existing permit such as material usage, hours of operation, etc.) State Only Compliance S atus IN OUT Consumption of Monobutyltin Trichloride in the HEST machines shall not exceed 70,080 pounds per year. X **** USE FORM 2000-700 TO EXPLAIN HOW COMPLIANCE WAS DETERMINED FOR EACH APPLICABLE REQUIREMENT**** Operating Permit Application Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS AND STATUS OF EMISSION UNIT FORM 2000-604 Rev 06-95 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: S003 4. Unit identification code: P011 5. Pollutant 6. Colorado Air Quality Regulations or Construction Permit Number 7. State Only 8. Limitation 9. Compliance Status IN OUT Opacity Reg I, Sec II.A.l&4 20% (30% as noted in reg) X 10. Other requirements (e.g., malfunction reporting, special operating conditions from an existing permit such as materia usage, hours of operation, etc.) State Only Compliance S atus IN OUT The diesel engine shall not operate more than 500 hours per year. X **** USE FORM 2000-700 TO EXPLAIN HOW COMPLIANCE WAS DETERMINED FOR EACH APPLICABLE REQUIREMENT**** Operating Permit Application Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS AND STATUS OF EMISSION UNIT FORM 2000-604 Rev 06-95 1- Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: S009 4. Unit identification code: P012 5. Pollutant 6. Colorado Air Quality Regulations or Construction Permit Number 7. State Only 8. Limitation 9. Compliance Status IN OUT Opacity Reg I, Sec II.A.1&4 20% (30% as noted in reg) X 10. Other requirements (e.g., malfunction reporting, special operating conditions from an existing permit such as material usage, hours of operation, etc.) State Only Compliance Status IN OUT The diesel engine shall not operate more than 500 hours per year. X **** USE FORM 2000-700 TO EXPLAIN HOW COMPLIANCE WAS DETERMINED FOR EACH APPLICABLE REQUIREMENT**** Operating Permit Application Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS AND STATUS OF EMISSION UNIT FORM 2000-604 Rev 06-95 I. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: NA 4. Unit identification code: P015 5. Pollutant 6. Colorado Air Quality Regulations or Construction Permit Number 7. State Only 8. Limitation 9. Compliance Status IN OUT 10. Other requirements (e.g., malfunction reporting, special operating conditions from an existing permit such as material usage, hours of operation, etc.) State Only Compliance Status IN OUT Annual records of the actual quantity of each primer, coating, reducer, thinner, glue, chemical, and solvent used and the current MSDS are to be kept. X **** USE FORM 2000-700 TO EXPLAIN HOW COMPLIANCE WAS DETERMINED FOR EACH APPLICABLE REQUIREMENT**** Operating Permit Application Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS AND STATUS OF EMISSION UNIT FORM 2000-604 Rev 06-95 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: NA 4. Unit identification code: P018 5. Pollutant 6. Colorado Air Quality Regulations or Construction Permit Number 7. State Only 8. Limitation 9. Compliance Status IN OUT Opacity Reg I, Sec II.A.1&4 20% (30% as noted in reg) X 10. Other requirements (e.g., malfunction reporting, special operating conditions from an existing permit such as materia usage, hours of operation, etc.) State Only Compliance Status IN OUT **** USE FORM 2000-700 TO EXPLAIN HOW COMPLIANCE WAS DETERMINED FOR EACH APPLICABLE REQUIREMENT**** Operating Permit Application Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS AND STATUS OF EMISSION UNIT FORM 2000-604 Rev 06-95 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: NA 4. Unit identification code: P019 5. Pollutant 6. Colorado Air Quality Regulations or Construction Permit Number 7. State Only 8. Limitation 9. Compliance Status IN OUT Opacity Reg I, Sec II.A.1&4 20% (30% as noted in reg) X Particulate Matter Reg 3, PartB,IV.E 0.005 grains per dry standard cubic foot X 10. Other requirements (e.g., malfunction reporting, special operating conditions from an existing permit such as material usage, hours of operation, etc.) State Only Compliance S atus IN OUT Maintain operation and maintenance plan X **** USE FORM 2000-700 TO EXPLAIN HOW COMPLIANCE WAS DETERMINED FOR EACH APPLICABLE REQUIREMENT**** Operating Permit Application Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS AND STATUS OF EMISSION UNIT FORM 2000-604 Rev 06-95 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: NA 4. Unit identification code: P020 5. Pollutant 6. Colorado Air Quality Regulations or Construction Permit Number 7. State Only 8. Limitation 9. Compliance Status IN OUT Opacity Reg I, Sec II.A.1&4 20% (30% as noted in reg) X Particulate Matter Reg 3, PartB,IV.E 0.005 grains per dry standard cubic foot X 10. Other requirements (e.g., malfunction reporting, special operating conditions from an existing permit such as material usage, hours of operation, etc.) State Only Compliance Status IN OUT Maintain operation and maintenance plan X **** USE FORM 2000-700 TO EXPLAIN 11OW COMPLIANCE WAS DETERMINED FOR EACH APPLICABLE REQUIREMENT**** Operating Permit Application Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS AND STATUS OF EMISSION UNIT FORM 2000-604 Rev 06-95 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Stack identification code: NA 4. Unit identification code: P021 5. Pollutant 6. Colorado Air Quality Regulations or Construction Permit Number 7. State Only 8. Limitation 9. Compliance Status IN OUT Opacity Reg I, Sec II.A.1&4 20% (30% as noted in reg) X TSP Reg 3, Part B, III.A.4 48.6 tons/year X Particulate Matter (PM 10) Reg 3, Part B, III.A.4 10.7 tons/year X 10. Other requirements (e.g., malfunction reporting, special operating conditions from an existing permit such as material usage, hours of operation, etc.) State Only Compliance Status IN OUT Rail cr unloading of raw materials {excluding cullet) shall not exceed 331,384 tons/year X Truck unloading of raw materials shall not exceed 59,349 tons/year X Rail car unloading of cullet shall not exceed 141,109 tons/year X Implement Particulate Emissions Control Plan X **** USE FORM 2000-700 TO EXPLAIN HOW COMPLIANCE WAS DETERMINED FOR EACH APPLICABLE REQUIREMENT**** Operating Permit Application Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE PERMIT SHIELD PROTECTION FORM 2000-605 IDENTIFICATION Rev 06-95 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO1234406 3. Specify Emission Source: P001, P002 4. Do not use 5. Pollutant, Equipment, or Process 6. Colorado Air Quality Regulations 7. State Only SO2 Emmissions Reg 1: VI A PM emissions Reg 6 Part A Subpart CC 60.292 8. Other requirements (e.g., malfunction reporting, special operating conditions from an existing permit such as material usage, operating hours, etc.) State Only NOTE: REQUESTS FOR THE SHIELD MUST BE FOR A SPECIFIC REQUIREMENT IN THE REGULATIONS. USE FORM 2000-700 TO PROVIDE AN EXPLANATION OF WHY THE SHIELD IS REQUESTED Operating Permit Application Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FORM 2000-700 09-94 SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO 123-4406 3. This form supplements Form 2000 - 605 for Emission Unit P001, P002 Additional Information, Diagrams Item Number Emission units were constructed after 8/11/1977 Emission units are glass melting furnaces using modified processes 1 2 Operating Permit Application Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE EMISSION UNIT COMPLIANCE PLAN FORM 2000-606 COMMITMENTS AND SCHEDULE 09-94 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 3. Stack identification code: S001 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 4. Unit identification code: P001 5. For Units that are presently in compliance with all applicable requirements, including any monitoring and compliance certification requirements of Colorado Air Quality Regulation 3, Part C that apply, complete the following. These commitments are part of the application for operating permits. X We will continue to operate and maintain this Unit in compliance with all applicable requirements. ❑ Form 2000-604 includes new requirements that apply or will apply to this Unit during the term of the permit. We will meet such requirements on a timely basis. 6. For Units not presently fully in compliance, complete the following. ❑ This Unit is in compliance with all applicable requirements except for those indicated below. We will achieve compliance according to the following schedule (If more space is needed attach additional copies of Form 2000-700): Applicable Requirement Correctiv e Actions Deadline 1, Operating Permit Application Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE EMISSION UNIT COMPLIANCE PLAN FORM 2000-606 COMMITMENTS AND SCHEDULE o9-94 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 3. Stack identification code: S002 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 4. Unit identification code: P002 5. For Units that are presently in compliance with all applicable requirements, including any monitoring and compliance certification requirements of Colorado Air Quality Regulation 3, Part C that apply, complete the following. These commitments are part of the application for operating permits. X We will continue to operate and maintain this Unit in compliance with all applicable requirements. ❑ Form 2000-604 includes new requirements that apply or will apply to this Unit during the term of the permit. We will meet such requirements on a timely basis. 6. For Units not presently fully in compliance, complete the following. ❑ This Unit is in compliance with all applicable requirements except for those indicated below. We will achieve compliance according to the following schedule (If more space is needed attach additional copies of Form 2000-700): Applicable Requirement Correctiv e Actions Deadline Operating Permit Application Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE EMISSION UNIT COMPLIANCE PLAN FORM 2000-606 COMMITMENTS AND SCHEDULE 09-94 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 3. Stack identification code:NA 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 4. Unit identification code: P003 5. For Units that are presently in compliance with all applicable requirements, including any monitoring and compliance certification requirements of Colorado Air Quality Regulation 3, Part C that apply, complete the following. These commitments are part of the application for operating permits. X We will continue to operate and maintain this Unit in compliance with all applicable requirements. ❑ Form 2000-604 includes new requirements that apply or will apply to this Unit during the term of the permit. We will meet such requirements on a timely basis. 6. For Units not presently fully in compliance, complete the following. ❑ This Unit is in compliance with all applicable requirements except for those indicated below. We will achieve compliance according to the following schedule (If more space is needed attach additional copies of Form 2000-700): Applicable Requirement Correctiv e Actions Deadline 2. 3. Progress reports will be submitted: Start date: and every six (6) months thereafter Operating Permit Application Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE EMISSION UNIT COMPLIANCE PLAN FORM 2000-606 COMMITMENTS AND SCHEDULE 09-94 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 3. Stack identification code:NA 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 4. Unit identification code: P006 5. For Units that are presently in compliance with all applicable requirements, including any monitoring and compliance certification requirements of Colorado Air Quality Regulation 3, Part C that apply, complete the following. These commitments are part of the application for operating permits, x We will continue to operate and maintain this Unit in compliance with all applicable requirements. ❑ Form 2000-604 includes new requirements that apply or will apply to this Unit during the term of the permit. We will meet such requirements on a timely basis. 6. For Units not presently fully in compliance, complete the following. ❑ This Unit is in compliance with all applicable requirements except for those indicated below. We will achieve compliance according to the following schedule (If more space is needed attach additional copies of Form 2000-700): Applicable Requirement Correctiv e Actions Deadline 2. 3. Progress reports will be submitted: Start date: and every six (6) months thereafter Operating Permit Application Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE EMISSION UNIT COMPLIANCE PLAN FORM 2000-606 COMMITMENTS AND SCHEDULE 09-94 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 3. Stack identification code: NA 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 4. Unit identification code: P008 5. For Units that are presently in compliance with all applicable requirements, including any monitoring and compliance certification requirements of Colorado Air Quality Regulation 3, Part C that apply, complete the following. These commitments are part of the application for operating permits. x We will continue to operate and maintain this Unit in compliance with all applicable requirements. ❑ Form 2000-604 includes new requirements that apply or will apply to this Unit during the term of the permit. We will meet such requirements on a timely basis. 6. For Units not presently fully in compliance, complete the following. ❑ This Unit is in compliance with all applicable requirements except for those indicated below. We will achieve compliance according to the following schedule (If more space is needed attach additional copies of Form 2000-700): Applicable Requirement Correctiv e Actions Deadline Operating Permit Application Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE EMISSION UNIT COMPLIANCE PLAN FORM 2000-606 COMMITMENTS AND SCHEDULE 09-94 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 3. Stack identification code:NA 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 4. Unit identification code: P009 5. For Units that are presently in compliance with all applicable requirements, including any monitoring and compliance certification requirements of Colorado Air Quality Regulation 3, Part C that apply, complete the following. These commitments are part of the application for operating permits. x We will continue to operate and maintain this Unit in compliance with all applicable requirements. ❑ Form 2000-604 includes new requirements that apply or will apply to this Unit during the term of the permit. We will meet such requirements on a timely basis. 6. For Units not presently fully in compliance, complete the following. This Unit is in compliance with all applicable requirements except for those indicated below. We will achieve compliance according to the following schedule (If more space is needed attach additional copies of Form 2000-700): Applicable Requirement Correctiv e Actions Deadline 2. 3. Progress reports will be submitted: Start date: and every six (6) months thereafter Operating Permit Application Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE EMISSION UNIT COMPLIANCE PLAN FORM 2000-606 COMMITMENTS AND SCHEDULE 09-94 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 3. Stack identification code: 5003 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 4. Unit identification code: P011 5. For Units that are presently in compliance with all applicable requirements, including any monitoring and compliance certification requirements of Colorado Air Quality Regulation 3, Part C that apply, complete the following. These commitments are part of the application for operating permits. X We will continue to operate and maintain this Unit in compliance with all applicable requirements. 0 Form 2000-604 includes new requirements that apply or will apply to this Unit during the term of the permit. We will meet such requirements on a timely basis. 6. For Units not presently fully in compliance, complete the following. ❑ This Unit is in compliance with all applicable requirements except for those indicated below. We will achieve compliance according to the following schedule (If more space is needed attach additional copies of Form 2000-700): Applicable Requirement Correctiv e Actions Deadline Operating Permit Application Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE EMISSION UNIT COMPLIANCE PLAN FORM 2000-606 COMMITMENTS AND SCHEDULE 09-94 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 3. Stack identification code: S004 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 4. Unit identification code: P012 5. For Units that are presently in compliance with all applicable requirements, including any monitoring and compliance certification requirements of Colorado Air Quality Regulation 3, Part C that apply, complete the following. These commitments are part of the application for operating permits. x We will continue to operate and maintain this Unit in compliance with all applicable requirements. ❑ Form 2000-604 includes new requirements that apply or will apply to this Unit during the term of the permit. We will meet such requirements on a timely basis. 6. For Units not presently fully in compliance, complete the following. ❑ This Unit is in compliance with all applicable requirements except for those indicated below. We will achieve compliance according to the following schedule (If more space is needed attach additional copies of Form 2000-700): Applicable Requirement Correctiv e Actions Deadline Operating Permit Application Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE EMISSION UNIT COMPLIANCE PLAN FORM 2000-606 COMMITMENTS AND SCHEDULE 09-94 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 3. Stack identification code:NA 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 4. Unit identification code: P015 5. For Units that are presently in compliance with all applicable requirements, including any monitoring and compliance certification requirements of Colorado Air Quality Regulation 3, Part C that apply, complete the following. These commitments are part of the application for operating permits. x We will continue to operate and maintain this Unit in compliance with all applicable requirements. ❑ Form 2000-604 includes new requirements that apply or will apply to this Unit during the term of the permit. We will meet such requirements on a timely basis. 6. For Units not presently fully in compliance, complete the following. ❑ This Unit is in compliance with all applicable requirements except for those indicated below. We will achieve compliance according to the following schedule (If more space is needed attach additional copies of Form 2000-700): Applicable Requirement Correctiv e Actions Deadline 2. 3. Progress reports will be submitted: Start date: and every six (6) months thereafter Operating Permit Application EMISSION UNIT COMPLIANCE PLAN FORM 2000-606 Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment COMMITMENTS AND SCHEDULE 09-94 Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 3. Stack identification code: 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 4. Unit identification code: P018 5. For Units that are presently in compliance with all applicable requirements, including any monitoring and compliance certification requirements of Colorado Air Quality Regulation 3, Part C that apply, complete the following. These commitments are part of the application for operating permits. x We will continue to operate and maintain this Unit in compliance with all applicable requirements. U Form 2000-604 includes new requirements that apply or will apply to this Unit during the term of the permit. We will meet such requirements on a timely basis. 6. For Units not presently fully in compliance, complete the following. U This Unit is in compliance with all applicable requirements except for those indicated below. We will achieve compliance according to the following schedule (If more space is needed attach additional copies of Form 2000-700): Applicable Requirement Correctiv e Actions Deadline Operating Permit Application Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE EMISSION UNIT COMPLIANCE PLAN FORM 2000-606 COMMITMENTS AND SCHEDULE 09-94 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 3. Stack identification code: 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 4. Unit identification code: P019 5. For Units that are presently in compliance with all applicable requirements, including any monitoring and compliance certification requirements of Colorado Air Quality Regulation 3, Part C that apply, complete the following. These commitments are part of the application for operating permits. x We will continue to operate and maintain this Unit in compliance with all applicable requirements. Li Form 2000-604 includes new requirements that apply or will apply to this Unit during the term of the permit. We will meet such requirements on a timely basis. 6. For Units not presently fully in compliance, complete the following. El This Unit is in compliance with all applicable requirements except for those indicated below. We will achieve compliance according to the following schedule (If more space is needed attach additional copies of Form 2000-700): Applicable Requirement Correctiv e Actions Deadline Operating Permit Application Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE EMISSION UNIT COMPLIANCE PLAN FORM 2000-606 COMMITMENTS AND SCHEDULE 09-94 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 3. Stack identification code: 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 4. Unit identification code: P020 5. For Units that are presently in compliance with all applicable requirements, including any monitoring and compliance certification requirements of Colorado Air Quality Regulation 3, Part C that apply, complete the following. These commitments are part of the application for operating permits. x We will continue to operate and maintain this Unit in compliance with all applicable requirements. ❑ Form 2000-604 includes new requirements that apply or will apply to this Unit during the term of the permit. We will meet such requirements on a timely basis. 6. For Units not presently fully in compliance, complete the following. ❑ This Unit is in compliance with all applicable requirements except for those indicated below. We will achieve compliance according to the following schedule (If more space is needed attach additional copies of Form 2000-700): Applicable Requirement Correctly e Actions Deadline Operating Permit Application Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE EMISSION UNIT COMPLIANCE PLAN FORM 2000-606 COMMITMENTS AND SCHEDULE 09-94 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 3. Stack identification code: 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 4. Unit identification code: P021 5. For Units that are presently in compliance with all applicable requirements, including any monitoring and compliance certification requirements of Colorado Air Quality Regulation 3, Part C that apply, complete the following. These commitments are part of the application for operating permits. X We will continue to operate and maintain this Unit in compliance with all applicable requirements. ❑ Farm 2000-604 includes new requirements that apply or will apply to this Unit during the term of the permit. We will meet such requirements on a timely basis. 6. For Units not presently fully in compliance, complete the following. ❑ This Unit is in compliance with all applicable requirements except for those indicated below. We will achieve compliance according to the following schedule (If more space is needed attach additional copies of Form 2000-700): Applicable Requirement Correctiv e Actions Deadline Operating Permit Application PLANT -WIDE APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division FORM 2000-607 Rev 06-95 FORM NOT REQUIRED FOR ALL FACILITIES - SEE INSTRUCTIONS #3 AND #8 ON REVERSE SIDE IF FORM 2000-607 IS USED; FORM 2000-608 MUST ALSO BE COMPLETED 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container 2. Facility identification code: CO 1234406 3. Pollutant 4. Colorado Air Quality Regulations or Permit Number 5. State Only 6. Limitation 7. Compliance Status IN OUT Particulate Matter Reg 3, Part B III.A.4 10.1 tons/month and 121.5 tons/year X PM10 Reg 3, Part B III.A.4 8.3 tons/month and 99.1 tons/year X Sulfur Dioxide Reg 3, Part B III.A.4 11.0 tons/month and 132.2 tons/year X Nitrogen Oxides Reg 3, Part B III.A.4 19.2 tons/month and 230.8 tons/year X Volatile Organic Compounds Reg 3, Part B III.A.4 74.3 tons/year X Carbon Monoxide Reg 3, Part B III.A.4 56.8 tons/year X Particulate Matter Reg 6, Part B, III.C 3.59*P062(where P<30 tone/hour) 17.31*P°'16 (where P. 30 tons/hour) X Is this facility subject to the provisions governing prevention of accidental releases of hazardous air pollutants contained in section 112(r)(7) of the Clean Air Act? 0 Yes X No Has a prevention plan been prepared? 0 Yes ❑ No Has the plan been submitted to the regulatory agency? C Yes Li No What Agency? Date submitted: 9. Other requirements (e.g., malfunction reporting, special operating conditions from an existing permit such as material limitation, hours of operation, etc.) State Only Compliance Status IN OUT Use of rental compressor engines shall not exceed 500 hours per year X Source is subject to the odor requirements of Regulation 2 X X -700 TO EXPLAIN HOW COMPLIANCE WAS DETERMINED FOR EACH APPLICABLE REQUIREMENT, THIS FORM IS NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR FORM 2000-604 ***** Operating Permit Application PLANT -WIDE COMPLIANCE PLAN FORM 2000-608 Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment COMMITMENTS AND SCHEDULE Rev 06-95 Air Pollution Control Division USE THIS FORM ONLY IF FORM 2000-607 USED SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE 1. Facility name: Owens -Brockway Glass 2.Facility identification code: CO 1234406 Container 3. For facilities that are presently in compliance with all applicable requirements, including any monitoring and compliance certification requirements under Colorado Air Quality Regulation 3, Part C that apply, complete the following. These commitments are part of the application for operating permits. X We will continue to operate and maintain this facility in compliance with all applicable requirements. U Form 2000-607 includes new requirements that apply or will apply to this facility during the term of the permit. We will meet such requirements on a timely basis. 4. For facilities not presently fully in compliance, complete the following. LJ This facility is in compliance with all applicable requirements except for those inlicated below. We will achieve compliance according to the following schedule (If more space is needed attach additional sheets.): Applicable Requirement Corrective Actions Deadline 2. 3. Progress reports will be submitted: Start date: and every six (6) months thereafter THIS FORM IS NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR FORM 2000-606 a Operating Permit Application Colorado Department of Health Air Pollution Control Division Facility Name: Owens -Brockway Glass Coriainer, Inc 1. ADMINISTRATION TABULATION OF PERMIT APPLICATION FORMS Facility Identification Code: CO 1234406 FORM 2000-800 09-94 This application contains the following forms: L Form 2000-100, Facility Identification ❑ Form 2000-101, Facility Plot Plan LI Forms 2000-102, -102A, and -102B, Source and Site Descriptions 11. EMISSIONS SOURCE DESCRIPTION Total Number of This Form This application contains the following forms (one form fur each facility boiler, printing ❑ Form 2000-200, Stack Identification ill T ❑ Form 2000-300, Boiler or Furnace Operation -� ❑ Form 2000-301, Storage Tanks 0 U Form 2000-302, Internal Combustion Engine El Form 2000-303, Incineration /s� ❑ Form 2000-304, Printing Operations l U Form 2000-305, Painting and Coating Operations /l n Form 2000-306, Miscellaneous Processes ri Form 2000-307, Glycol Dehydration Unit 6 III. AIR POLLUTION CONTROL SYSTEM Total Number of This Form This application contains the following forms: n Form 2000-400, Miscellaneous r0 Form 2000-401. Condensers 9 LI Form 2000-402, Adsorbers lJ (3 n Form 2000-403, Catalytic or Thermal Oxidation (/ H Form 2000-404, Cyclones/Settling Chambers 63 r Form 2000-405, Electrostatic Precipitators +2 M�p ❑ Form 2000-406, Wet Collection Systems (;�i Form 2000-407, Baghouses/Fabric Filters IV. COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION Total Number of This Form This application contains the following forms (one for each facility boiler, printing ❑ Form 2000-500, Compliance Certification - Monitoring and Reporting d i V Form 2000-501, Continuous Emission Monitoring If n Form 2000-502, Periodic Emission Monitoring Using Porlahlr Monitors t C� ❑ Form 2000-503, Control System Parameters or Operation Parameters of a Process O H Form 2000-504, Monitoring Maintenance Procedures /1 Form 2000-505, Stack Testing 2 LI Form 2000.506, Fuel Sampling and Analysis A� n Form 2000-507, Recordkeeping C I Form 2000-508, Other Methods `) V. EMISSION SUMMARY AND COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION Total Number of This Form This application contains the following forms quantifying emissions, certifying compliance with applicable requirements, and developing a compliance plan ❑ Form 2000-600, Emission Unit Hazardous Air Pollutants ( ❑ Form 2000-601, Emission Unit Criteria Air Pollutants )) l ec ❑ Form 2000-602, Facility Hazardous Air Pollutants I ❑ Form 2000-603, Facility Criteria Air Pollutants ❑ Form 2000-604, Applicable Requirements and Status of Emission Unit �j ''11 ❑ Form 2000-605, Permit Shield Protection Identification f ❑ Form 2000-606, Emission Unit Compliance Plan - Commitments and Schedule /3 ❑ Form 2000-607, Plant -Wide Applicable Requirements f la Form 2000-608, Plant -Wide Compliance Plan - Conunitments and Schedule VI. SIGNATURE OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL - FEDERAL/STATE CONDITIONS A. STATEMENT OF COMPLETENESS I have reviewed this application in its entirety and, based on information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, I certify that the statements and information contained in this application are true, accurate and complete. B. CERTIFICATION OF FACILITY COMPLIANCE STATUS - FEDERAL/STATE CONDITIONS (check one box only) ' I certify that the facility described in this air pollution permit application is fully in compliance with all applicable requirements. I certify that the facility described in this air pollution permit application is fully in compliance with all applicable requirements, except for the following emissions unit(s): (list all non -complying units) WARNING: Any person who knowingly, as defined in § 18-1-501(6), C.R.S., makes any false material statement, representation, or certification in, or omits material information from this application is guilty of a misdemeanor and ntay be punished in accordance with the provisions of § 25-7 122.1, C.R.S. Printed �or Typed Name �Ji✓✓o,y,vc 4.. WeAcrze✓ Tid / 7&N'/ /77/7"/'2 ic>' Signature Date Signed if Operating Permit Application Colorado Department of Health Air Pollution Control Division CERTIFICATION FOR STATE -ONLY CONDITIONS FORM 2000-800 09-94 Facility Name: Owens -Brockway Glass Container _ Facility Identification Code: CO 1234406 VI. SIGNATURE OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL - STATE ONLY CONDITIONS A. STATEMENT OF COMPLETENESS I have reviewed this application in its entirety and, based on information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, I certify that the statements and information contained in this application are true, accurate and complete. B. CERTIFICATION OF FACILITY COMPLIANCE STATUS FOR STATE -ONLY CONDITIONS (check one box only) i< I certify that the facility described in this air pollution permit application is fully in compliance with all applicable requirements. I certify that the facility described in this air pollution permit application is fully in compliance with all applicable requirements, except for the following emissions unit(s): (list all non -complying units) WARNING: Any person who knowingly, as defined in § 18-1-501(6), C.R.S., makes any false material statement, representation, or certification in, or omits material information from this application is guilty of a misdemeanor and may he punished in accordance with the provisions of § 25-7 122.1, C.R.S. Printed or Typed Name ,e / 614.2die ✓ Ada(.7v Title PLG,vf lti14trilsex' Signature 2k 1 � /il Date Signed .fro SA, 6 SEND ALL MATERIALS TO: COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APCD-SS-B I 4300 CHERRY CREEK DRIVE SOUTH DENVER, CO 80246-1530 APEN PERMIT No.: U O z O !—I v 1 ss Container Inc. o Po 0 v N NI 0 0 ul H H C '0 W 0 cc 0 D U 0 m n a a U v O' E-2' off U � v Li -1 N M a C H 2- eu 20 Oi viF F V W ocra 0 P, <H z 4 L51 U r i O ? a en <C a?- °a= 0 c x ` O " P4 a -re. z� {I4. O O xPzr oz 6D2, E H w VI fox OO10 C wi Z H¢a oz 0 0 w H 0 O H o'0w z la c O O 0 z 0 O 2 e w z w C) c, z vto h N M N N `C ,0 U �N ci 3 r' N lr C O G xchr w N O w C, 0 0 .0 C- a C) 3 0 ,0 z 0 Q 0 O z w C> 0 U H Pi 0 en w z 0 n w H O m v J N w U a r, 0 W 8 w R co H i- Q, 0 Di 0 O z en eo vi N N H) N v v 0 in Percent by Weight d GD z en h O En u oti - Op e H aw act 4. H0 0 0 O 0 U I a) v O j vc ci Q Cd v '0 a' a Molten Glass Design Process Rate (Specify Units/Hour) 17.92 tons/hr • o O P. Pei w o V 7 9 C U C a C Raw Materials Used C 0 0 See attachmen C FUEL INFORMATION Description of Combustion Unit 0 z z� en H 0 H a PROCESS INFO O W 52 C) 0 0 z rQ fit H la 0 Q is U O C .I n . 0 P.a " m o 6. P. o H z 6 C v y w w d H y ,, O 0 [to¢ L 2 7 y5 4 U m H G > v ii - El a i v {i7 �a '0 t Ti 2 ci o en a w P.o o G`.Et aw q u v 0 ,m C .'a' a v .J 0 t y� 7 N, , V al `''`j}:4).) F N �}3 �:. 0 3.= :aa v O W 0 .C) � � � 0 0v 6 0p� 5 6 , m 'E S` 2 O :4 'y FLa E. a�q��N"vaeeeo ZCUH WH <5-t 36 Ua H C .J (34 — cD C) a Z r- C4 UU W H 9 C) aHW Qa , W G why H z z 0 0 TROL EQUIPMENT 0 U Type of Control Equipment 0 H U a w L O ui c-1 C N 0 w vi 06 O\ ro en N w H C O_ P-1 N C - ti co e H i v. w'2 C Dr: Scrubber Q z z 2 a 2 Y. Q ESTIMATES' 2' i :J 770 w0. C :HiiP - U Hi -C 00 z > U w HH C- 4 z H x .U. x 0 w LU r P,n O ci C O N� N' O' W W o g aR �m PnW Cil 3 O� ror a -d a ar.54 yV 8 a -,0 0 `ION NOTICE ADDENDUM* w 23 r W - a - " O'« ae m c Q _ w J co a I- cc O a w cc mQ IL w 0 z 3 416-232-3059 Patrick Huynh phuyrh@oicanada corn a) nO C ,buen 7. ° O Z w C 6 E N ° o W Emission Factor I Requested Emissions Actual Emissions from the 5once (Ibs/yr) Data Year flbs/rrl T stack test I 39,37.5 Cl er..zcl Absuvet 5sCce Chemical None Reporing I Control Equiomenu Emission Factor AL —C; Bin Efficiency (include units) F (4 a — J a O X P U -I .; L-3 m rn Y b Year Far Which The Actual Data Applies: U Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division Stationary Sources Program Supplement to Air Pollutant Emission Notice (APEN) for Air Pollution Control Equipment TRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE 1. Facility Name and Location: Par APCD uee only Permit Number: Owens-Brocicwav Glass Container Inc. - Windsor Facility AIRS Point ID: 2. Control Device: Type Make Model Serial Dry Scrubber TBD TBD TBD 3. Date placed in service or last modified: Jan 2005 4. Describe the control device. Attach a diagram of the system. Also attach copies of Operation and Maintenance Instructions supplied by the manufacturer. The dry scrubber will remove SO2 by injecting lime or equivalent that will react with the SO2 and will then be dropped out of the gas stream using the ESP, the material will then be recycled. System diagram is attached in Appendix 4. The O and M plan is not complete but will submitted prior to operation. 5. List the pollutants this equipment controls and the control efficiency for each pollutant on the table below. Attach documents to support the information. Pollutant Estimated / actual inlet pollutant concentration (Give Unitsl Emission capture efficiency, % Outlet pollutant concentration (Give Units) Control ° Efficiency, /o SO2 57.3 lb/hr -100 14.3 lb/hr 0.80 lb/ton (-75%) 6. Description of method of handling the collected material for reuse or disposal. The collected particulate matter is managed, by using as a feedstock for the glass container manufacturing process. The material is closed -loop handled, by pneumatically converying the material from the Dry Scrubber to the batch house. Once stored in the batch house the material is used as a raw material for the manufacture of glass containers. Under typical operating conditions and ranges all of the collected material can be used, no waste will be generated. 7. Prepare a malfunction prevention and abatement plan for this pollution control system. Submit this plan with the application. This will be incorporated as a permit condition. The plan may include, but not limited to, the following: a. Operation variables such as temperature, flow rates, differential pressures, concentrations, and other vital parameters that will be monitored in order to detect a malfunction or breakthrough, the correct operating range of these variables, and a detailed description of monitoring or surveillance procedures that will be used to show compliance. b. Monitoring equipment used (temperature sensors, pressure sensors, CEMS). c. An inspection schedule and items or conditions that will be inspected. Inspection records will be maintained at the site. d. --.4 maintenance plan to assure continuous compliance. 3122 /0+ - ignaturc of Responsible Official (not a vendor or consultant) Robert E. Lachmiller Date Vice President, Manufacturing Manager, Glass Containers, North America Name of Responsible Official (Please Print) Tide Revised July 2001 http://www.cdohe.state.co.ustap/stat ionary.asp Colorado Dcpai [went of Public Health and En vii conical An Pollution Control Division Stationary Sources Program Supplement to Air Pollutant Emission Notice (APEN) for Air Pollution Control Equipment SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE Facility Name and Location: Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. - Windsor Facility 2. Control Device: Type Electrostatic Precipitator Fur A WID v,r unly Permit Number AIRS Point ID: Make Model TBD _ __-- TBD Serial TBD 3. Date placed in service or last modified: Jan 2005 4. Describe the control device. Attach a diagram of the system. Also attach copies of Operation and Maintenance Instructions supplied by the manufacturer. ESP are desistned for coned ing jarticulate matter utilizing encrslzc-d plates that attract particulate and are then deencrgized and shaken to dmp particulate into a hopper which is then conveyed for recycIing, System diagram is attached in Appendix 4 The O and M manual is not complete, but will be supp ed.L[mr to operation. List the pollutants this equipment controls and the control efficiency for each pollutant on the table below. Attach documents to .nipporl the information. Pollutant Estimated I actual inlet pollutant concentration {Clive Units) Emission capture efficiency, Outlet pollutant concentration Give Units) PM 17.92 lb/hr 7 -100% 3,58 lb/hr Control Efficiency, % c 12 lb/ton ( --8O%) 6. Description of method of handling the collected material for reuse or disposal. The collected particulate matter is managed, by using as a feedstock for the glass container manufacturing process. The _ material is closed -loop handled, byaleumatically conve:yine the material from the Dry Scrubber to the batch house. Once stored in the batch house the material is used as a raw material for the manufacture of glass containers Under typical operating conditions and ranges all of the collected material can be used, no waste will be generated. 7. Prepare a malfunction prevention and abatement plan for this pollution control system. Submit: this plan with the application. This will be incorporated as a permit condition. The plan may include, but not limited to, the following: a. Operation variables such as temperature, flow rates, differential pressures, concentr'atlons, and other vital parameters that will he monitored in order tir detect a malfunction or breakthrough, the n:urreet apetatmg range of these variable.s, and a detailed description of monitoring or surveillance procedures that will be used to show compliance. h. Monitoring equipment used (temperature sensors, pressure sensors, GEMS). c. An inspection seFwdulc and items or conditions that will be inspected. Inspection records will be maintained at the site. ')4t, A main enance lint to assureommunus uunpaucc_ _ Signature of Responsible Official tnot a vendor or consultant) Robert E.Lacluniller Name of Responsible Official (Please Print) 21(2. Date Vice President, Manufacturing Manager, Glass Containers. North America Title Revised July 2001 hull L'. vyv.cdphe.atattCaf u:;lap's1eGnYi[o s,a5p b C m o o m g N C 6 L c LNJ O �• 02 a a �I c0 c i0 W d W W a H H Vt En 01 00 0 n W o ,4 ci. 0 0 `` 0 a ov , c w a g _ ra• o4 r. / o ; "4 44x0 ,. ° a u 4.11 Ow r V d a' w a m o1 92 En g w z 5 C.) w o z Q O co N" 0 H co N _ia— x U L .- 0 cd u 2 H ow" 0�E. '�+.ad c4H ¢ (L;) Q a a 0 a �ma 2 c W F 04 au H H U _ ] ¢ J N SZ V) O CD (it') aH0 cU <, Ca V P.) O o a H ^ Q W k.14 a U W F+4 OCa Z Q¢ wH H H a ti Q i Z-' Z 6 H 0 0 44 1( HV W c4 EP ¢ ax1 L-4 a Q, oa-, V E) En LID N m Ed .0 U ON 0 vtr, U Ed Q U 0 O w H 00 o < w 0 a 0 9 F Eff F 3 O Ed G E¢ co HE 0 Seasonal Fuel Use (9 of Annual Use) Z di 01 Op N A N .0 Eu U 0 In Percent by Weight on z 7 h I - LE oco o w FR I a0 o°' >in wd o0 a7 Fa 0 0 v• w v0 U PI in ,0 3 cn 0 w$ w m n 0' V m z a en I- In L bi ZEd d v 04 U 0 0 a a "al W Molten Glass Design Process Rate (Specify Units/Hour) 17.92 tons/hr 0 0 a U C Requested level 0 N oo Raw Materials Used See attachment FUEL INFORMATIO V Description of Cmnbustio z o PROCESS INFORMATION 0 0 0 a` F C a 0 a m a 2 E.F. (1.0 Ib'tonl moo.OH 0 a rw w 6 0. 1 uS 0 0 FI: FIJI gid 0Oj Np0 cxa wHOH0 W al H W Wz� 0 F ^ 0 V id G sit 0 0 0 UNCONTROLLED CONTROLLED z a 0 W a 0 U H 0 a 0 W CC U C a H c a a a, Z z -4a w` a z z N a 0 Ca Cat 0, 1. Z z z In Q z u 0 0 0 z ¢ z z v; p Haw Ha 0 a {t�FM 00 L OF 0 OOH O0 Z zoo 0044 a 0 0 N22 0 a a wry .:. a c. w L AL DATA A U H U x Authorized to Supply Data: 0 a 0 rd -2W v ._ zx Z W Ga Ed us 0- a'r aaEr a Er Cv c� 0 2_ v '1224 tic 1U. .C c to r30 Ed o�L 'o 0„ G a'm a • Etr � u < w�= waP� c4 v „U O a9- W Ey'2 Asa W _ U n = E F ti is 2 a z W a a W U H z Z O z a§ J o Q.: Ca, w J CO a I- CC 0 CC w�y a w I- AIRS Number Permit Number 3 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. 416 232-3186 0 Z T o F O 0. ui phuynh@oweus-ill corn Emission Fac for Requested Emissions I Auual Emissions from to I. Source (Ibslvrl Data Year 6bs/vrl 0.25 lb/can stack test 39,237.5 LL 6 �- m) 0 0 0 .:moire, A b sn eel Serrcier Chemical Name Reporting l" _.nbc. Bin 7664939 - Sulfuric Acid 1 B I. I • Year For Which The Actual Data Applies' and other Non -Criteria Reportable P U Mans, Ozone Depl U a vendor or consultant) le Official (please print) 157 Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division Stationary Sources Program Supplement to Air Pollutant Emission Notice (APEN) for Air Pollution Control Equipment STRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE 1. Facility Name and Location: Par APCD we Sy Permit Number: Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. - Windsor Facility AIRS Point ID: 2. Control Device: Twe Make Mode Serial Dry Scrubber TBD TBD TBD 3. Date placed in service or last modified: Jan 2005 4. Describe the control device. Attach a diagram of the system. Also attach copies of Operation and Maintenance Instructions supplied by the manufacturer. The dry scrubber will remove SO2 by injecting lime or equivalent that will react with the SO2 and will then be dropped out of the gas stream using the ESP, the material will then be recycled. System diagram is attached in Appendix 4. The O and M plan is not complete but will submitted prior to operation. 5. List the pollutants this equipment controls and the control efficiency for each pollutant on the table below. Attach documents to support the information. Pollutant Estimated / actual inlet pollutant concentration (Give Units) Emission capture efficiency, % Outlet pollutant concentration (Give Units) Control ° Efficiency, SO2 57.3 lb/hr —100 14.3 lb/hr 0.80 lb/ton (-75%) 6. Description of method of handling the collected material for reuse or disposal. The collected particulate matter is managed, by using as a feedstock for the glass container manufacturing process. The material is closed -loop handled, by pneumatically converying the material from the Dry Scrubber to the batch house. Once stored in the batch house the material is used as a raw material for the manufacture of glass containers. Under typical operating conditions and ranges all of the collected material can be used, no waste will be generated. 7. Prepare a malfunction prevention and abatement plan for this pollution control system. Submit this plan with the application. This will be incorporated as a permit condition. The plan may include, but not limited to, the following: a. Operation variables such as temperature, flaw rates, differential pressures, concentrations, and other vital parameters that will be monitored in order to detect a malfunction or breakthrough, the correct operating range of these variables, and a detailed description of monitoring or surveillance procedures that will be used to show compliance. b. Monitoring equipment used (temperature sensors, pressure sensors, CEMS). c. An inspection schedule and items or conditions that will be inspected. Inspection records will be maintained at the site. d. A maintenance plan to assure continuous compliance. i 'Signature of Responsible Official (not a vendor or consultant) Robert E, Lachmiller Date Vice President, Manufacturing Manager, Glass Containers, North America Name of Responsible Official (Please Print) Revised July 2001 Title httnaPwti w.cdnhe.stale.cc.us/aptsmlionart/.asn Colorado Department of Public. Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division Stationary Sources Program Supplement to Air Pollutant Emission Notice (APEN) for Air Pollution Control Equipment SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE 1. Facility Name and Location: Owens-13rocky Glass Container Inc. - Windsor Facility 2. Control Device: Type Electrostatic Precipitator Make TED For Arco usr only Permit Number AIRS Point ID: Model TBD Serial TED 3. Date placed in service or last modified: Jan 2005 4. Describe the control device. Attach a diagram of the system. Also attach copies of Operation and Maintenance Instructions supplied by the manufacturer. ESP are designed for collecting particulate matter utilizing energized plates that attract parr iculale and are then deenergized and shaken to drop particulate into a hopper which is then convvyed for recycling. System diagram is attached in Appendix 4. The 0 and M manual is not complete, but will he supplied prior to operation 5. List the pollutants this equipment controls and the control efficiency for each pollutant on the table below. Attach documents to support the information. Pollutant Estimated / actual inlet pollutant concentration (Give Units) Emission capture efficiency, % Outlet pollutant concentration (Give Units) Control Efficiency, % PM 17.92 lb/hr -100% 3.58 lb/lu .2 lb/ton ( -80%) 6. Description of method of handling the collected material for reuse or disposal. The collected particulate matter is managed, by using as a feedstock for the glass container manufacturing process. The material is closed -loop handled_ by pneumatically converyrthe material from the Dry Scrubber to the batch house. Once stored in the batch house the material is used as a raw material for the manufacture of glass containers. Under typical operating conditions and ranges all of the collected material can he used, no waste will be generated. 7. Prepnrn a malfunclprevention and aharentent plan for this pollution control system. Submit this plan with the application. This will he incorporated as a permit condition. The plan may include, but not limited to, the following: a. Operation variables such as temperature, flow rates, differential pessures, concentrations, and other vital parameters that will he rind toted in order to detect a malfunction or breakthrough, the correct operating range of these variables, and a detailed description of monitoring 01 surveillance procedures that will he user' to show compliance. b. Monitoring equimututl used (temperature sensors, pressure sensors, CEMS). c. Air inspection selltdulr and items or conditions that will be inspected. Inspection records will be maintained at the site. d --,A maintenance (.plan to assure conlrnt pus compliance. Avt i_z7iz > / Signature of Responsible Official (not a vendor or consultant) Date Vice President, Manufacturing Manager, Glass Containers, North America Title Robert E. Lachmillet Name of Responsible Official (Please Print) Revised July 2001 dl o 0 b O en Earl ° PERMIT No. n Wtn 0 U o 0 U O ° 7z H O F ,r b 0 ti' F4 ) 0 e. U O En M ,- H • � Z i U a, a r p r* g O P up i • '.<z ii —,!"o c W 6 a Z0a • ,.,0z F—i • .a.Z, w z a< U 04 o12 Eri a ° w w 0 O,9 ° m v) w el z0 o ° Q F 0 0 0 zw F H Z w U w w9zo. ▪ ✓ w CC 0 ▪ �o r-0 00 rie ▪ sw Ea 0 w U W F O CO F W ▪ Z aow Z al En O O H O 0 5 z d ter, V1 N 00 0 N ?� N .0 Q N v X v en v Ed Q 0 x ¢ a 0 fud ca 0 .0 a, a a z O 0 0 z w a O 0 Seasonal Fuel Use (% of Annual Use) 0 6. to N N C 0 P w 0 N N U A z W m lR E v01/4 N Percent by Weight z of 6 t ki 0 a ao J 7 0 •E 0+x .m xHo of 'W 0 0 U a Tct I, z 0 73 O; T 0 O cc a w Q v o ao 0 a 'N o- w-. w C 6 wg 761r] Natural Gas a>• zz Q z zz z zz Requested level z 0 a N d z N o0D x C FUEL INFORMATION Description of Combustion Unit N 0 av' D PROCESS INFORMATION 0. az O z z 0 E HP A y a .- o �� o x a a o -1 F N .C p 0< W 0. CN o * v 0) h w Eu v Q [-H m `O fµ° K in p o a !'1 U o N .°0 o) V ,d j0< H .D p R r0 tr. ell 0 v a TU. a E .5. Na 0 0 ¢ d [mj . ., m o 1" v 0 a0i `I.T 1„ .8 w U V, Um 0 E, O^ M U o..E .E o 0 Q o _ v v v uia ii0v YN a ] w .c' a) 5 P ' 3 rr2 F F0 2 -SEE E O 0 U' 0 0 U' 0 M x H 0. 045 ax° w 0 w W .0 W C. 0 W 0 a 0 W w 0 n 0-1 [+1 0 .o wi w ON CONTROL E Type of Control Equipment 0 W W 0 U F O N 0 N Erg m O N O V N O N m 0 N CO N 1O N O o ¢ ¢ z z O a Cr In a V N 0 TIMATES" INS E--- LOUca <HO a ti<:ao° `O[444F, o F. a F -0 ' F a R a >10 z 2 Z ❑wa ' 004 <ap Qon cFF QZ L F F i J J O LL, J LEE w F 0 H 1/EAR FOR WHICH TH 0 a ° 5 O 00 0 h 0 0 O V j 0 0 a 0 03 S F; bW" z 'T Cr z W Q 0 Send completed forms with fees to: 0; 'E 3v04 L "5' 0. p u `a rL A h ca yv oW m •o"-8 q Y..+ et .au w 0 .5 PERMIT No.: 3 O co a 0 OP O DO O U s i V z o W a O c 1 G+ C C O Y c rc.WO O „ o U C a QP' A wz6 0 o z 0 W° = z °a r,o- z, H d 9 N ti „, F- ob Fdyz O p ''°w -CS° is c K. vi F C. ; F a0 Q a O 3 o _, i- z r_i• O u , O O o H<O. OW 0, x L ZQC LUcf, H _F • Q Z z < z LU O W ▪ z a z R.Sd E I Fo ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR REMARKS a .� ry Q N Y Ekri or - O zN O H 0 CL - O Seasonal Fuel Use (84 of Annual Use) u co N C C Len N N .O It N Percent by Weiebt a Lab z 7 rn N O O � O k'p S 0 uN V O z LU c a y O O N V Q 24, ae O rt. W - O o Edo V z Li DO Cc H ▪ 0 II 000 C b N O .8 N r O C. FUEL INFORMATION Description of Combustion Unit annealing lehr (4) O O IS I z r CHECK ALL BOXES THAT APPLY U New or previously unreported source' ❑ Requesting modification of existing permit if ❑ Change in emissions, throughputs or equipment t ❑ Transfer of ownership (List previous owner in REMARKS section of box A.) t ❑ Previous APEN is expiring t ❑ Request for Emission Reduction Credit if ❑ (Specify) Complete all applicable portions of APEN f Complete "Requested Level" values for permit limits $ Complete all information above box A, and those remaining portions which reflect changes DATE. YEAR FOR WHICH THE ACTUAL DATA APPLIES: f ed Nme and Title: Date source began or will begin operation: {{ a Fi:r`, Enc'uonmenIsI Ens ur. er January 2005 f ESTIMATION METHOD E.F. (7.61b/10'cf) E.F. (7.6 Ib/l0'cf) E.F, (0.6 Ib/lOscf) I E.F. (100 lb/I0tcf) E.F. (5.516/IOscf) 11.7734 11.7734 I j E.F. (84 Ib/l0`ci) ❑ CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH THE DIVISION TO CALCULATE YOUR EMISSIONS. SEE "EMISSION ESTIMATES" INSTRUCTIONS ON BACK. Signature of Person Legaily Authorized to Supply Data: j ACTUAL EMISSIONS (from data year) ESTIMATED EMISSIONS (TONS/YEAR) AT THROUGHPUTS REQUESTED ABOVE CONTROLLED f UNCONTROLLED h O - N O o -- V 00 O o 14.016 14016 0.7709 0.7709 cc N _2,O N O o E u OUW Q z Q z Q z Q z Q z NCO N/A N/A N/A PLEASE IISE APCD NON -CRITERIA REPORTABLE. IR POLLUTANT ADDENDUM FORM TO REPORT SI:'C \1 'POLLUTANTS OR POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED ABQ 'E 'E. PMLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT Type of Control Equipment A rn C E .2-7.7 P. Q >zzzz Q ¢ a ¢ ¢ a Q 7 a {Pollutant IP S i O U 0 Finished Product -Annual Output Actual level (Data year level) N/A 0 1C3 o C Design Process Rate Finished Product Description (Specify Units/Hour) I z Q z Raw Materials -Annual Consumption Actual level (Data Near level) V/N Requested level Q z Raw Materials Used I O qz ',ors D. PROCESS INFORMATION Descrption of Processing Unit N/A _¢ dz 0 I Serial No N/A 0 j o a w 4:3 "Liu of a az Ex o ¢ O ,c,“4O H C -0G <, rn STATE: Obi O z Q U O z O U iw rid CFO o CIO C 0 2 LOU F G " a T N axza a x c O .(8) (.0 y eo a rd P,z� Ho x�z O ;) zw H¢ Co ux 0 Co 0 Wiz P3 ¢ 00O0 O Ln a' V X H O 0 , az O w �z M CD Normal Ooerarion of This Source O a V N eo Q ti N N m N 0 N Q N X N N - M r N Q r Q a xN z 0 H 0 za z w 0 E w CC 0 Co s w 0 0 0 CO G N 0 L Al Al F a O z H z w 0 H W V O O G 3 .N, o 6 ua a Seasonal Fuel Use (51 of Annual Use) z h Z A z z w 0 0 s z HZ v 2 Ca Percent by Weight z Co h d a a U zz z Design Process Rate (Specify Units/Hour) V V a z wd 0e eq w 0 F a z a G 0 O Arl Inn Raw Materials Used Mould Lubrican s oon C FUEL INFORMATION Description of Combustion Unit Make/Modell NiA Serial No : N/A ORMATION D. PROCESS I G H ¢ g 1< H v o a Ho o a x , ❑ G a o ° C F .� x z wo cl H 2i0 ti ¢ H � 0 a, 2 k No,a aPd-2 •a a G > 0 O u u Lp [�',' t.,n G l� o C '.l O. G O4 ai W 4'O=j N C O Q U a ova a a va0� q L C F .0 - N N N C V 0 U n g `J `"9EU '-T' G.9. v a' E a u 0 '0 ww � _ U G 2P� a c .a '8 .2 Q o E S u P. O V ho0 0C o h ..4 ._ Cas Q.0 a b m.j °1 aaa�� kJ' o o c a. Fa zaUH `�P. CG `'UUU See talc. details See calc. details See cak. details See cafe. detail 0 V a v Co C E i w A w a.r o 0 er-iU w o ° F 0 U z U 0 a -NCONTROLLED C en N N z Q z z. N CCC N 0 z z. 0 ten z z :G Ol en 0 M O z z DO 0 DO ¢ z z Co 0 W O Ec O W N -r WCo Pi z LA H z O d °W f� w Ems; o ci 1- Q z H Q Co F U t M 3 C x G i 0 O O o n w art 'T Q _ c It a F .0 7 L9 3 N DO `a;7- Fo 0 w ° P Send completed forms with fees to: • III z 0 z W 11133 County Road 64— 3.4 Windsor Colorado 80550 0o U 0 0 h W 2 2 T x "n o U z� O Z µo u za w H • :- zw U q W ao L V n ry n l y Vi HRi J— Ow Wz dz3 y o w p"Et' `' Ho �U C TaF W O az oodi a < W H 0 0 Q z Pr: dH and ~ z a W — ¢a w w i a O a La z 6. y 0 N 7 N ou 0 •0 • h 0 W La N Q Normal Operation of This Source Gn di 3 O Q 7 diiN z O H Q 0 w O ii .0 a s 0 0 n ii 0 a z O sC 0 CP Z _ W O U H dt I 0 7 N Seasonal Fuel Use (Ii of Annual Use) 0 v La z C- z n 6 z J'31 Q zz Percent by Weight I z La z x]o age tcH z " 8 et zz v b a zz z 0Z'` a ca c v '5 hag a N a UEa E o U} -p, av'U Vn Design Process Rate (Specify Units/Hour) zz ate', di or a Ct z e v0 O a0 u O N wa Pi 0. di o a Q z it 7 a FUEL INFORMATION Description of Combustion Unit d z a .24 2 z r v - a zz Requested level -O 0 00 0 O r- Raw Materials Used F z cn Pi 0 Z PipNCO O WFq U ,� H O <0 0 PP H z z 0 0 a .5 D. PROCESS INFO 0 w" 0 0 0 di 2 Q ro H wO 0 C OUW ON CONTROL EQUIPMENT Type of Control Equipment Z z Q z it Z z d z C 0 N di a 2 Q z a d v 2 z 6 z Q z Q z 0 0 a N Ii W 0 LO 0 Q z W Pi ci N CO N ti z I E.F. 5 lb/1,000 gal 0 Q z i. c q O • 7 gi H 0 can S • U U g H o • 4 O w q b 0.l Ft F w xz o FE in O • w P-4 H� W c. G N 41 Q a O) O ✓ 0 a edi a C w Fc - 2L7 ✓ cc Pz 3'a 9 i w^ `._ a ac 0. vac a v C4 v > aye N3V 0 u o v " 0.0 v V dF^ C " aoC C.i O oar q • 3 •;,;•< v'di upt c L „t' H E Z ELL -ra s._. C C 2 w o C LU U Z �VI �/ I W frd N - 2d P JC J n 0° 2 Q. w d LU MJ W Q 1- 0 LU 4 H tC O w L so I o ,A Cl) Chemical ha lance C ti c ro ti 7 .15 i 0 V 0 v y j SO 7 0 h j U U a Y 0 U s v E] C' 41 PERMIT No.: U O z VD O P1 F1 U cid ct h 01 0 o x Q z 0 oo') rylo n, T), a mH d 3N O �o o. U O 4o� < zq< --<' ooJ0z w c aa0 =o Ea a m - o 0 o V w a. Q le, n d z O.l zH0 V oz w -'0) F co E. Fz d w 0 a u zz Q H O DD • 0-1 • a 0 0 cU F.1 0 F20 0 0 0 U U W H O Q H ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR REM 0 0) H r) di b0 7:_5< z 2 "2 P we 0 3z v d 07 0 Z LO a a� h O G G 0 P 2 di .O Q Less than 500 hrs/yr c ti a U w7 aN -o- on z EM ti O 137,000 Btu/gal Q a or, v N w U C a o w ' .0 ri F EI Q 0 0 O U et N C FUEL INFO 7 wv o C 7.1 CD 0 w Tij F' n a z Design Process Rate 0 ."G 5 N z u U C, S n x VE 25 FQ C z di z 2.010° Btu/hr U Q 7 Z 0 0 U G Backup D!esel Generator A 600 LW Make/Model: TBD H Ca d h c x >'' H A - N ia. vir ' 0 O NO x E W E p o_ PI � Q H • E w a m ° o v a H Cil 7 .6 0 U- 0. 2 W o y cn -' 0 `,, a, Di O Y py H 'p v e t ro r- ... c u o .7 n0 o CL .a o `o cp 0 a.vc Q O '' _0 't 0y 0 a 0 d = .3 P. : G. .5. m -0 8 x F y '',2 ru p ti F' C g.:r^. IC o 7 . _ l2 —a �� x a h 'd 3 o W W m °W.' U y v . 0 0. FV' a eu.P o ¢ o^ c c + , `c t vi. w a= y v v v c g. m w a 0 a z N OH i d, a in3u u a cu� r� 0 [O C -„ N H .c s La a a a c., u. m 0 W NI EL 10 c' 00 0 0. 0 o co W R u l U H 0 c 0 d L z d z d V z z ry Q z n; is el, b 0 o c O o u v, 0 0 Q Z EH ".' U E.I Ett .a U U on H • 4 O • CID i rW LID N ti _ q W it w • O '0 [ N Lan o • W r = w • V2 x a J �r -6 �: C) Q t. ^Err C ,Up H.ad H 14 d O0 7N H 0G E -z �aN p0 as Z 270 OW 0 00 ddCO WHH X7.7 ,OFF -tea 0 ff 0 _o a Q N 3. O w G Ci F 0 on a•, U 0 gri 0 o - 0 W 4 Q 0 a Cti Uo 0I EL0 * 4O� Z —m W a p ¢ w PERMIT No.: ao LI W 15 N Uo Or V [H a [�' . 0 O J t 5 w • H b H N O o 1,1 , o,uo ° w w �1 o o w I� CID U a 4 , V w z Cl) -1 w H 0 O_ C7 °� oH ILIo 5 x g4 U W Hw 0z U'-) H77 ft Co.!! 5,`.z cclL' I § rd H v w H a z N C7 w q H u F 38� ova • O 8 H or 41 _1 a a(gqh.o o ¢ < a � .4 HH] w a -11 `I' HOG o¢ 7 7Z .--I -I ,j xca. w L7ti 7o. 07c O W1 H O -c �h] En La d Ut H Y 3z u L Q mz 0 H 0 .a w Z w U 0 0 Cn c r= as two or more. ref 1 3 J 7 0 0 w 7 H a 0 so H 0 T c w U Q z o 0 w O 0 a .0 Q z O IrdJ O O O r on 0 w 4, V.N < N 7 C o 47 0 o� K La w z c w 5 v 22 ` z Design Process Rate (Specify Units/Hour) z v 4 41 o C C CW N Rag: }tnterlals N 7 a z Llo in _ LI 7 c. ge CC0 A w 0 C • 3 a 0 6 Q z C. FUEL INFORMATION Li U 0 L Lc U q co Model: TED L Serial No TED D. PROCESS INFORMATION Li C ra LI cll H 1 4 v K C H p P • H F O p' x E C a o H a H 'E "s '2 x W �' n a y b Rua N w- 0 V 'I U o tl -4 O b u ti, {I1j. H u ra 4 a C) a' m O G ° ('G OL'0 N • 0. y N 8 o o a h o a. C m z' m C F v N r4 .G O N ? ° z. - cd o 57ww - V v a, c° a° aia C .. u O el C ,, a 7 • C O H a' P. ix U U 0 a G w U1 5 OLDzxw E,6• 0- w• HO HH -eC 7-41 Q :7 L. W O • y wz 0 H T ▪ u.0 Q °' z °Uw CLI 0 0 r- 0 U 7 0 H a a .-1 c w 0 U o` ▪ 2 7 47 0 O 2 cc z LU th O w w c e X x b l CL O0 O — O 53 o a u. Lil w N O Q z z N cc 7 a -.I uii4O a G (CO O CC x CII G -V N N CN 0 5 I�Z 41 O on Z 5 U U O h H O w H S r a 'r+ W 8 o ▪ Ln ▪ W w w YOi E ay 7La o .7. _040, 74L <L H a.z7 io- O - == L� S x O 6 e L7 s a W E, w T a F- C C L O '2 C w • �U di 04 Cofjj P L,CO u U LL V Lao 4-V O 7 v Cd oU w ?'o? U¢ -,o Q a Lon: J to: 0404 Lao 7.0 417. Laity v a� 4u Cti. '*Z o NO a O z H Po U O z zb O ./1 x a W C7 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR REMARKS. B. STACK OR VENT INFORMATION IJentih.- below which stack if plan( has two or more: refer to attached sketch of plant izyouO LPlant ID No. for Stack 7 Space Htg (% Ann.) d z z Design Process Rate Finished Product Description (Specify Units/Hour) d zz d z Fuel Heating Value: (BTU/lb. BTU/gal, or BTU/scf) N/A Process Seasonal Throughput (.%. of Annual) o mai Vi N Flow Rate Velocity Moisture 100,000 ACFM 2,600 ft/min 2 ou = O u J Actual level ' (Data year level) N/A cd zr, ¢_ z Ih y n z Requested level 2,400 gal. P o o m 7,300 gal. D w $ C1,, A w Raw Materials Used Description co N :P. 'I v 4, r Duracote Normal Operauoa of This Source v 4' N 2 •v a •z• T W' h. Temperature 127 F D. PROCESS INFORMATION Description of Processing Unit Carton Printing, Hot Glue, Cold End Spray Make, Model: TBD Serial Nn TED C FUEL INFORMATION 11 Description of Combustion Unit Z z o o z?. K z z 0 2 n UI W xN 50 A- GENERAL INFORMATION K K. ei, Height 30 ft a H a xH N 0. O H H C .B f u b i_. u a v eo o n W o 4 U b N J] ..] W H . Y_ a SILL NI 'a .4 ,s, • O�j .5 -0 .-1 N p 'ay a ."' 0. rt a m R H v` ai o 02; !F o t 3 y u .≥ E V. o o pWp1� W o r ¢ E O. cH . E • v v v c o `n g y2-. 0. O �' y R 0. q Qa�.'vQ EE0 2 aOH `-'P. CUo00 n 0 u 0 c9 c 0* H c E w M G0 Pi w N cid ui a z CA H a h x z 0 ✓ MoO WXa H H a' a N W,. 0 UNCONTROLLED q H O U 12 a 2 H P' P W a ka w a o P4 0. O H U z O 0 E. i N a z a z z a z a z V a z zz a z z a z 0 I 0b z a z a - z z 0 0 2 z Authorized to Supply Data: wHH a 0. -CC o wHH c.) c�� La - O,W. 0 -o . n N O oa 0C v on k4 i ❑ w 0 I- O Z O /U�) V J z ch Zm av N 1-1; DE 0 Qu C a w J La r CC 0 w CC CC w CC O Permit Number d 0 0 V O jig m (24 c- a C 7 C U rrr) o 416 232-3186 G 7 C h 0 0 kr z ro U o c G v U 4 G P..yyttes!td Emission; Actual Emissions from the II v Emission Factor So=iree Chemical balance Emission Factor (include units) See details Control Equipment/ Efficiency er z q C z IrLI uu ti J 7 0 di 0 N O d U z 0 0 a S 0 0 E U 00 G C) N C 5 5 0 c 0 J as F) 0 v C) C 0 U A N O 4 M C F M Q C 0 l z di C a 0 P. O O F .ffE O i a 7'd Q v eel a r c • r ei n C C L: r 2 a z C C a W U H Z Z 0 c i La1-4 Zo 1 c 1� tl 111 J CO CC O a LLI CC _a g E k W H x E 0 U C7 w 8 O h O 00 416-232-3059 b g o N 3 416 232-3186 I W A a Emission Facts( Requested Emissions Actual Emissions from the Source (lbs/yri Data Year llhsn-1 CD CT DO Chemical balance f Emission Factor (include units) See details E5a at i. 'z m C em a d Chemical Name Glycol Ethers I Cherrical Abstract Service Nut a 'z Year For Which The Actual Data Appli 0 �z • 2 PERMIT No.: STATE: Ohio 0 Ory ation of This Source .v 3 O n. zn, f c n V) 0 z 0 N G — ry E a E o — rEn Err Cr, Space Htg (% Ann.) Percent by Weight I Seasonal Fuel Use (% of Annual Use) 0 0 ¢ z W < Q z >, a z a z En z Fuel Heating Value: (BTU/lb, BTU/gal, or BTU/sci) G E U Actual level (Data year level) ¢ Z 71-1 0; a Ti 9 cr a ¢ z Kind of Fuel Burned z Design Input Rate (105 Si U. tan N; .A C FUEL INFORMATION Description of Combustion Unit -0 2 0 d t LZ Z C Y 3 C 0 U 2 0 L C w. aQ Reouested level z b C 2.2 G. R ti0 :6▪ 13 w z 00 00 0 0 0 rn zz Z an _on 0 RE a HQ O a s w o 0 w w LL ui ui Requested level 0 0 u Q 7 0 H Q z v u 0- 0 4-2 r. H to (U J _ 0 aF• ELJ if nor C- z CO J N G 0> rA a CO 0m - < wFo F w � <~ i01 TWOy� Lid 0 C u • U 0 E 7 w Vw I. G CONTROLLED N a G i !, Z to rn cri a Q Z Q z Q z Q Q z Z z 2 Q Q z V Cr' 0l C+ L�1 Vl c <HO F0w• 22Lei 2 2 e00 " Url FOZ V F V -4 Z 4 < < < < < 4nJ 2 2 2 2 2 2 772 JO 0 00 wHv, Z J CC 0= QJ� o 7 do YEAR FOR WHICH THE ACTUAL DATA APPLIES v cdo PERMIT No.: W O h U z o H� H a OV Z 5 Z U r� O 0 PI al Cn a Cl) U 0 co cid co W 3 H T ow Zx 2 o U q '_m. H�',. u H '->z 3 tio y O ' U C w0co 0z QH F-1 , v. {L W 19 0 W a LE SOURCE o>71 � O a< 2 S U W A 4 rn 0. m 0 H U CO w aH Z Eo in 1- a F Q H 0 a. a z.", 14 Hi H 0L'o wiZ H EH V O H¢w azO 0040 =' V W H 0 0 Po - z afa�o„LI Sao aJ a 0 H 0 G T. z R al in V] N nC' N fi N w qN Y ar‘?-, v Qr- Cd Q O :FORMATION A. GENERAL U y z° 2 a ,L N w E O Space Htg (% Ann.) Seasonal Fuel Use (% of Annual Use) a d z o z T s yd F a w v o d z Percent by Weight a 6 d z = d z ' Fuel Heating Value: (BTTLI/lb, BTU/gal, or BTU/scf) d zz Annual Fuel Consumption Actual level (Data year level) d zz I Requested level d z Kind of Fuel Burned d z Design Input Rate t 196 BTU/ hrl z P z C F C. FUEL INFO Description of Combustion Unit Make/Model: Serial No.: N/A z d z d z u O (Specify Units/Hour) zz 0 2 U j N z Requested level z. Ex O d zz rap a a � a) H a La t,,) Ci 0 22.g C 5 a v v F '2 'P 'a a z o n u M'',-,H. y� V W 0 V G W o .5 a C 2'51 .~�1 E O y r Ov v e4, s H.(9 .'gip m P O 0 0 �'0 0 7 Di L' Q5oka.E.".P' Lb.AC x a r) 8 a d o 0 8 E v U y 4 v .m h 0„.9, 0 a d p O z .E d G _U O , 0+ •O a W W Q: V., 5 OO N N l' -''P a.G .5 0 .`,(2'='!---:.'8.°1'.r)- 5. • v ' O u © u" g' 4'' ° 4 t, or a E E E o ZKUH�aa,=000 4 .7�Gc, c 0 u u 0• x H z O0 Pi 0 w a) 0 w ui U 0 ui Q z z` U a a ow z No0 U wFq U QHit? — WQ Haw " a a O 7 O O U M LO ii Cr. '0 e 4 D. PROCESS INFO 0 q 0 U O q a x 0 O 0 O O PO 0 F z UI U O W a cG 0 U 0 a a z i z -C z c E 0- 0 w C 0 `0 C 0 z cti a Q z CL Q z ti z Q a z z a z Q Q Q Z z z Q z O Q z O a Q z 2 z U O Q z E. OZ �.. Z U Co) -, cn o 1) 0 q z o `" O W zx o U a,y� C7 $ p0W� W : O0 Z El; XOH Nz -HF oo U H 0. CD Q -- Z..O w QQgg C a. Hi r.;4 ;4 ? HH v: U -r_ L 0 Authorized to Supp 0 M a Uc 00 ar a r� a cc Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division Stationary Sources Program Supplement to Air Pollutant Emission Notice (APEN) for Air Pollution Control Equipment SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE Facility Name and Location: Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. - Windsor Facility Control Device: Type Dust Collector Make TED Date placed in service or last modified: Jan 2005 For APCD uNt only -- Permit Number: AIRS Point ID: Model TBD Serial TED Describe the control device. Attach a diagram of the system. Also attach copies of Operation and Maintenance Instructions supplied by the manufacturer. There is a total of three dust collectors as part of this system. The dust collectors collect material at different conveyance points to control nuisance dust. System diagram is attached. The O and M manual is not complete, but will be supplied prior to operation. List the pollutants this equipment controls and the control efficiency for each pollutant on the table below. Attach documents to .support the information. Pollutant Estimated / actual inlet pollutant concentration (Give Units) Emission capture efficiency, %n Outlet pollutant concentration (Give Units) 0.005 gr/scf Control Efficiency, PM/PM10 N/A N/A N/A 6. Description of method of handling the collected material for reuse or disposal. The collected particulate matter is managed, by using as a feedstock for the glass container manufacturing process. Once stored in the batch house the material is used as a raw material for the manufacture of glass containers_ Undertypical operating conditions and ranges all of the collected material can be used, no waste will be generated. Prepare a malfunction prevent ion and ahalerncnt plan for this pollution control system. Submit ibis plan with the application. This will be inuuiporated as a permit condition. The plan may include, but not hunted to, the following: a. Operation variables such as temperature, flow rates, dilfeaenrral pressures, cunecnlrat0W S, and othci vital paramelcir that will be monitored in order to detect a malfunction or breakthrough, the correct operating range of these v;arial>les, and a detailed description of monitoring or surveillance priiredures that will he used to show compliaiuec. h. Monitoring equipment used (temperature sensors, pressure sensors, CEMS). c, An inspection schedule and items or conditions that will be inspected. Inspection records will be maintained at the site. „� . A maintenance plan to assure rnnonnom. i rrmpliaure Date Signature of Responsible Official (not a vendor or consultant) Robert E. Lachmiller Name of Responsible Official (Please Print) Vice President, Manufacturing Manager, Glass Container, North America Title Revised .July 2001 4c U N O iu ¢ an }j C' V Z ti C 3 f= w u N � v pC v °Za m y ] < C O V 0,zo Cz n Uo W oa FNS z ..5 o d V w °° UW ^ T H o ❑ Z ¢ v az N a H 04 ` y W aaz LL za 01 �tW7 m O .O o o c ai a °-44 an cv� fa °a w .W] H F In cc 0 O U o q V O 0 cc as v F F. a ax 4 a U G .0 O 0 c p., Zw m C 0 ' az U H o odH u Faw E^ N F Hz ¢ 0 ct) N -aN N N :N v ❑ N 8 F 0 0 7. a o F w U Y -m v b O xN N C u N O 0 P `o di u L 0 .0 y. V 0 F 0a 0 J w z U H w oLU 2N v U7 � D W 0 V d z Percent by Weieht d h at i ?--2)_ u c 0 v> 0 IT a z >, E r a ¢ z C, N F ❑ z c a G 0 s v c. Prz T n Q V Design Process Rate 0 p Ca. z ri a G wv z Requested level V Raw Materials Used i P. .L' d xz C. FUEL INFORMATION Description of Combustion Unit O '5 a D PROCESS INFO )11 U- a C. 0 IC h 4 S section of box A.) I x v u C Fy F a ..I a 4 G '� V 5cqC r O La)S-a a, E a x a U.5 U:. -5505u-154 a'.9 G 2CUF U''lfL �?UUU 4 t] I5 C9 000" H z HO FO 0 U 0 V ail 0 0 0 w w d z d z m N N M VI C N d z LU 0 e4 L 0 Exhaust inside BHous 4 LU N Q z d z d z z z ¢ z Z z ¢ z R z 7 z ci h DATA .APP! 3E F U C, YEAR FOR \ HECH T}{ will begin opera W u N O PI cn 0 b cW CC C v GC d po J M= u v, cC"cC E_ •. 0 r a an. ta M --tact w c E a'` aW r�Sc� wv e 0 ° a 0 -t t o; - Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division Stationary Sources Program Supplement to Air Pollutant Emission Notice (APEN) for Air Pollution Control Equipment SFF INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE Facility Name and Location: Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. - Windsor Facility Control Device: .Type Dust Collector Make TED Pm APcD tAe aney Permit Number: AIRS Point Ill: Date placed in service or last modified: Jan 2005 Model TED Serial TED Describe the control device. Attach a diagram of the system. Also attach copies of Operation and Maintenance Instructions supplied by the manufacturer. There is a total of 34 dust collectors as part of this system. The dust collectors collect material at different conveyance points to control nuisance dust. System diagram is attached. The O and M manual is not complete, but will be supplied prior to operation. List the pollutants this equipment controls and the control efficiency for each pollutant on the table below. Attach documents to support the information. Pollutant Estimated / actual inlet pollutant concentration (Give Units) Emission capture efficiency, % Outlet pollutant concentration (Give Units) PM/PMI0 N/A N/A 0.005 gr/scf Control Efficiency, To N/A 6. Description of method of handling the collected material for reuse or disposal. The collected particulate matter is managed, by using as a feedstock for the glass container manufacturing process. Once stored in the batch house the material is used as a raw material for the manufacture of glass containers. Under typical operating conditions and ranges all of the collected material can be used, no waste will be generated. ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Prepare a malfunction prevention and abatement plan for this pollution control system. Submit this plan with the application. This will he incorporated as a permit condition. The plan may include, but not limited to, the following: a. Operation variables such as temperature, flow rates, differential pressures, concentrations, and other vital parameters that will be monitored in order to detect a malfunction or breakthrough, the correct operating range of these variables, and a detailed description of monitoring or surveillance procedures that will be used to show compliance. b. Monitoring equipment used (temperature sensors, pressure sensors, CEMS). c. An inspection schedule and items or conditions that will be inspected. Inspection records will be maintained at the site. d. A maintenance plan to assurerwmnuerus Date Signature of Responsible Official (not a vendor or consultant) Robert E. Lachnvllcr Name of Responsible Official (Please Print) Vice President, Manufacturing Manager, Glass Containers, North America Title Revised July 2001 hill,' s.tlun.N u_.ip/ti1n wiru �.usn PERMIT No.: J U I1 O z zo H . >H U Co Co 44 51 '8 = 0 x Z Hv "' 0a� 0.T E 3 %`) V Oar. 133 County Road 64 - 3/4 Windsor Colorado 80555 0 LE SOURCE 0O 0 41 N n m ._ G a o x= wl 4 N h C N wQ F a O > W a H F • 0 0 J. a 0 a ' 0 0 0 0 w 'O 0.1 ¢z3 H0 0 We w Co '"CH A H ¢ A. O OW 0 Pt Ui H 00 ¢da W O a a z rte/ 2223°8 a OrUi� F+i 'z Q� H 0q g qH 84 84za H WW 4. W W a Vi -2 C ¢ 0 0 F 0 0 Co 0, z A. co co N rdm F N v Q N v 3Co Ci 0r- Cd 0 xo, = 0 0 fEj 01, 0 E 0 3 a .0 C _ z 0 0 H 7 _ W 0 O V Q H P] Seasonal Fuel Use (91 of Annual Use) 0 h m a z 6 z d z y a. z 0 0 z w o¢ xzz d >O a 0 u a ¢ Q C m d Q z a z v= a 4 Q 0 Design Process Rate (Specify Units/Hour) d 7 0 0 0 a 7 (v. 00 ae X LL •d 0 CO z a d z Requested level 7 a2a o.= lo t. 7 •C -'6 xz C FUEL INFORMATION Description of Combustion Unit R z 0 1 co z Co D. PROCESS INFORMATION Li 0 0 a 0 roq Z I� Y q co En H H5 W UNCONTROLLED CONTROLLED 6 7 -C 7 d z 64 z A n 0 HL m 0 p G 0>0Cd av 00 „a o o h .. wa� 3 4 3 7 0 w a 7 r 0 2 z ¢ ¢ ¢ 7777 ¢ a Z 7 ¢ z d z z LLUTi ON CONTROL EOLiTP,MENT Type of Control Equipment 1.0 Te ¢ 2 7 L e 7 4 7 z a 7, Q d z FG U P7 O O a �1 p u F LI0 o z O w H F 0 g N c, 0 o ow E5 W � x a U co 0 0 zy FFq zpa L.g C) i X00 0�Co F�F 't 0 a 0pa Z4°a aCI g4 Q0 ¢d2 0077 a -Ca %J'a ;:i-ia a L L o H .5a d °10 2 3 0- u x P ,,, 0 '-o w = o m q M w nn Legally Awl a a vW r V' Send completed fonns with fees to tiO Insignificant Source APEN 0) P4 Q t2 c4 a BLE SOURCE C) C owl. O a m cL O .e c • C U ry ▪ 0. p w o 0 o 9 ya0 I+. W i- rn �dHQ 0.oa ] C U o O O < • Q P. 0 ▪ 0 Vl w OHOJ aow Lu a4 G ❑ d O CO ONN ci ▪ N a w ❑ N Y 3n v T qr P� Z N E 0 °n 6 0 L .0 0 0 O 0 L w 9 u S Z 0 F O Y 7. eG pia U r a 0 • a O Seasonal Fuel Use (% of Annual Use) z e' h o c N N i u u O in N Finished Produc I Percent by Weight 6 00 z En N U O 'ten o to o a` > IL e O N 4 P E F � C E 0\ ▪ 55. d w 0 0 TIE z o viz Ei m_ ^ C Q 20 >' 41 o E u a A a u4 0 E c µ aC axH 'E .� } W 6 ' `0 m g18 m°cw� U °L ° F ° F h K a C O c :MI5Lta-g ° Va ?;.1-.=.: ° c 0K Li -J..2 u o- ac -t-F., �1°Cs II N ° v V a� 0 L" F -. N _ x_c�N j c;I_lE vcu u C a 1,-1% 3 C)• ins= -c -o.a wti 3 a� " L a a o 0 o a zur-?c.��UU V ■ 000 ❑fD• A44 YEAR FOR WHICH THE ACTUAL DATA APPLIES N N 0 Err?, L2, o E O 7 z ga n= I C FUEL INFORMATION Description of Combustion Unit D PROCESS INFORMATION C 0 0 W 0 0 H W C 0 W In LA LI O U— 0 en 0 z U ❑ 0 cL O eo en N N 00 N N o c O 0 ro N en T N CO col oo b O O N ❑ CHECK HERE IF YOU a O >I Z W O N • 0 z U U) O °� Zr.Z O 4 O £ z N H W z W W Ui T c T O° Uc OUa 400 a Q zzz a z w a 5 0 J ON H 0 u -r_ J m u a 0 O 0 0 a w ¢ ¢ zz z a z c w Q a z a z C Q Z a z ¢ G Z G z zz O O Z > G zz Q zz C 4LIO H0 O3. a. z z uCma U�• J Z aWa 0 a0o ccZZ • a a n 'a 5 W 0 0 aaa if Person. Legally Authorized to Supply Data: o w w W w 3 p up w -J°z p.m .0a E PW fO E PERMIT No.: STATE: Ohio 0 N 0 00 9 w 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 Vi a ro 0 a 0 e H 04_.. O , P c_ � u u w mw opzb- 4H0 x000 ocfp H E LF¢ y 7 a w z a H O C70 4HHz a H H 2a uTh 0 0 W QI z z 0 .1 z ° z z H ay O 66Cw4 W EI`I jar G ail . Cw7 63 0.i O O n - c 0 4 H 0 u 0. 0 vN (AN N ti N ..'.N P O N ci 0) .0 0 N ci ro Tokj o 9 0 0 e. Y 0 ti _ 0 0 _ 0 a fl 00 w G a en La; g a� 0 Seasonal Fuel Use (t of Annual Usel 0 v N 0 N in N N T v N .0 ci co a) N w N y t, a r. [G zz z z . --•v 1-1 G o V 0 C H 'p '9 '' z a n 8,v a2Q H 0 lab o ti w v x o> v h (] N {LF. H b p elp Pa O o Pi G •O O, A A .' p y2O.-I « ao° 5- a w u a'c c z o 'tea" & E T, u p17i pq� T 2 - ,1,-; d ]v ypy y 'O p .z b• p_ U 0 . .+ o o E c a W it s�0,=�:0 tlry• tura v W 0. v al in. 0. 'qc av)�oo. .u0 V F-.�CCa UUU (9 0 CO U' C.1 (9 x x to a 0 0 O E 0 c, 7 0 ura 72 v i- <44 0 z Design Process Rate (Specify Units/Hour) z tl a C N T O c.' h o A 0 42 w I wo 0E 5m cC z Q z Requested level z w Raw 'Materials Used 0 7_ z eti Pr; UN zw z 0 ti 0 w z a U Description of Combustion Unit 0 z L H z E re D. PROCESS INFO 0 L z z o Po gx y w PI co Z 60 . Hcna eWcn C H 0 co tea(- z NNO 00 00 F 0 H wcF Fi w (nya w� C a a H 0 U C 0 a 0 W w Go 0 0 0 0 0 N w PI m 0 v ol 0 .0 0 on no m ori O O b V N N O of 00 6 O O N O Type of Control Equipment r. v z zz z 2 .7.7.7.7.7 Q z z 0 G L w 0 r. N 0 d z O O U.) U C 4 H O W Et H o & F W x z w C r ti 000 Cal U AR FOR WHICH THE ACTUAL. DATA APPLIES 2 v0 Ft Q 6 ti a p a) en 0 0 co W N 0 o> N APEN'1_5�of Q ¢ z z r a N STATE: Ohio 0 a W 0 U H n 0 0 31 _ o O O LI N o ,Wact Z 30 a au.F O w a 0 x O O Y 0 y/i _2 m W 'C VJ x V 2 m d a ° W U H J tj 0 F Z 0 W o a' nO H �'uu F, F� 3 _N_H H ayz •OQ o.O w_ wKin • 0 o o H u. d N v s W 0 vo Wp:Z H o O° J K z a ^ rn W O 0 u hw o z0a op 02 U Z Q d 2 N a°w Z WW d`' nw W L- a d 7 Process Seasonal Tlito N F 0 O z Q ;N N L ry Q0 tu Or P a) ON x 7_ 0 L. 7 .a W Z 0 P 0 u N J V "n E o _v 327> 60� 0 z a N N a c N ci N a Ls. a N Percent by Weigh tio z a r cao O � p0 0 0 0 T cQ z = O c d 0 E 75 v = ru tat t) G .111 V aY aQ z a 2 z Design Process Rate (Specify Units/Hour) d z OD C M C a O E a v � Eo 4 'E -a o w °a. 0 x• aWa m0 N a u o N a 2:0678 U o o W u0i n 7 0 C'� u K .4 a d o o u ° ri ri J o.c ...it ° �.Cb a`1 ,� 0 C v a4 io cs `0 v° ci a 2 U _T i,= o_ v c u�'� u y.Vp,�Co7''gc ^amca'ci U • S E a c d W � V s °ao a d.= C u W N C U V N O u o0 H 6',..1 O L 'U d d d [,' o.� y„v m a E E E 0 ZaUF�.O: a�.0 UU d 1010❑ DOD* +-+F d EP ac'aC 0O o L-. w u ui C W 1i 0 0 LL; u 0 0 G.; W 0 Li w O En 0e v cm co col n zz O a w Requested level Q zz b K E C. FUEL INFORMATION Description of Combustion Unit Belt Burner (8) 0 n cc o n �r C 0 R: z D. PROCESS INFORMATION Deter -vice of Processi,s Unit Serial No. N/A _a 9z .i UNCONTROLLED 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u m ui 0 CONTROLLED 0 0 0 N 0 YEAR FOR WHICH THE ACTUAL DATA APPLIES: A o C° LU OCal o Z U a a U O_ Q z N F z 00 O N r N 01 c `,. } 4s1 tra Ui N c Z ric X o a v x r. C.) m CT - O V if >t O 0 UW F z W F g 0 0 W c E 5 0 0 0 O Q z Q z v c 0 N a z d z a d z: 7 d z C z aa z z ment APEN l _7_o1 F W E S[e U II H G z� O �{ Cd c cc — u eud F N We Hro b 3 -LL Zx H ti U a O P H o v m 2 H [ U H 3 0e. 0 UI-� O FO ,$) G oJ _ z2H F --i J z S77 as . 'z STATE: Ohio 0 O O U O b A a C U h ABLE SOURCE 2 ar5 o cO c R' S n O u o C , UI rJ w Q O' n m Oal w0 0 5a O LL LL vi LV.J W .zU two .W-1 0 F a azz 0O<Ui, E. U W W HO J cd w ui `aUJ ❑ i O z O ADDITION 0 U N Q =N S S' N N O L H C _ 0- 0 Tel z N 3 u 134 r— e O 0o j U E a 0 c O Seasonal Fuel Use (% of Annual Use) ° N N C N 2 v Pu P N Percent by Weight z 0 N N U om S a U L re c O S U 3 ° n If STAL 4OR VENT INFORMATION (I O 0 o0' >4 U Q o 0 O— w 0 n a U4 z 0 P 'a Q zz Design Process Rate (Specify Units/Hour) Q z '0 U a N vi ^o F O 3 Clan Natural. Gas b N G C FUEL INFORMATION Description of Combustion Unit Pm -Heat Mould Oven (4) Raw Materials Used I Raw Materials -An Reouested level Q z U 3 ^Es �aGG z a,p aye o 9 8 DO e;,�b o _ a m 7" c -].° NVEN a°A a gC ));i4 ' aN O °J l0. U JU v w=v_° O E0 x"'6a00re; aE Z auH:1, a. '�u L?)EIECIO r cn E a PROCESS INFORMATION _a 0 0 S 0 Ut C z on F20 IL N G W U O a LL1 U b LU a 0 -45 0. LU U O a 0 LLi C- O W UNCONTROLLED CONTROLLED e 0 T O U F. C W UW 6.0 0 e O O O rro O O CA O Oa O m 0 CEO O O Q Q z 2 Q 7 a z DO LL) Q z C g H Z a W W o a ` W O K T z O U 7 0- 0 J G O a 0 H d v O UI F L a a z c 2 a Q < z z a Q z z Q Q z. U 0 0 O z > u 0 Li 0 a m so 88 c S m m hO UI O U a a 12 ;40 3 JP CN bSO 1;" y,4m 0 Ut 2U ° 0 ° ] u 12 Ut O °'CC 4 PERMIT No.: u O 0 In In oo 0 a 0 a U 0 571. ti w G U on W O O M1i G a I, H P4 c G. W En 0 O z O ' 0 •J H ', z • C7w u zx +] • C O 0 • O < Q a H H a a u O a rn W O IL 04 O zr5 • O 04 Ca SI 0 u H a G h 0 G 0 a¢ u,z ¢ Xz n W ¢ qz 17 H 0 r a z a 3 0z Q 0v. u, v v,2 n z N Seasonal Fue! Use ( % of u� 2, ¢ Ca OJ z• Lip 0 6 L. 2 Q > a 4K boH F �a Pei ET, ho 137,000 Blu/gal E o � .n z Design Process Rate (Specify Units/Hour) z ti. a O rri U a 0440 WF F C G v 0 a U Raw Materials Requested level ¢ z 4 m 4^ F a rc 0 a 0 ¢ C 'V 0 •a--) ' 0 C FUEL INFOILMA U a O a u 0 u a a a H z SS INFORMATION 0 c a .a U a LF cu H n] ¢ 5 F n_ K G v a; ._ H F _ a: �] udTh.v r a H F 0 'E .C �H 0 0 Ha LI H, E .2 u ,r, Z. a ,'a ♦ a" 2 w Lw�12 HP. b vi �' .^-1 H" ' ai o ti 0 x H OD O F ej W U 0., p U W EI ] C C m e, ¢ 0 •$ w H E O v c. �- C X a' W o a t n_ 1- W 0 m G,C 0 o a v- - S u.='ui 9 v - `" W 7 a" F 0 z .' C- x O O N 5= W W N 0 U 0 [y A ' 1E, w 0 o �. W' a. :-IL n LU �.m .- F F C.. ::- -.! Q� v 0' E 0 c z1U4 P.a°"UUu a NI 2dE r. z a r•.. a 6, c c� U RI:ssxxN. DI! cA H W 0 U C. 0 W Z i O 10 O 0 C W 1 U �, z H W 6, a. W gu: u: a Li al 111 w LU W W U a Q0 U N F H .a W G G o WU .I 0 H O H a n1 O a C 04 a. a i z i Q Z z ¢ z a z z V. i 0. w c' H Z 4 F Pt - 0 n m) F ,, a O FC V 7 nI Uo 0 G,i _ an] 000 w ~ M z a o" ¢ a v 42 CU APCD-SS-B I 00 o y E a Rai ix w r F z 04.54 u. v ;c 0 E. PERMIT No,: U O z O DO STATE: Ohio ZIP m o 0 M . M N C 6 acs - 'o O 1.6.1A F 1,` C 4 0 iG d P w o u u o 0 0 o zU ,y a s N 51 cH H.0 r. Pt 0 5"C W • W y a 44 1/44 0 0Ec5 w • N P• n t L U 0 P 11 U -. - x z W I0- �w H v onk Fw 5xz ▪ o Q s a z w 0 ` A ,fir H w� ux @mow i O % W O tau AE -1° tau (q UQ E., W0, aiR M'I `<a,' H 0O. z• 0Z W"� az "— r:4, -z 0-z wsa a,a0 0 0. Vi N coo N N P 0 v, rON k GENERAL €NFORMATION d a 3M 3 CC q x;tr 4) h 0 '0 2 I- 0 0 C 3 z. F• 22. E- 11-1 O 68 W g o Seasonal Fuel Use (% of Annual Use) z (119L' z a- z rd- v a z 19. a z W Q z a U z zz z z Design Process Rate 0 a w z w ao O aWv 0y C) Q z Q z 'z Requested level 0 N N O 0 w A Q z a 3- '-‘51 I a) ti 0 ro G C FUEL INFORMATION 4) .H .0 0 e 0 CL a z Make/Model: N/A Serial No.: N/ D. PROCESS INFO o F c C O 0 0 a F U H v U 0 H E a z Oq gz 6ddd � o z zz 'z z F w 0 0 r UW LLLTION CONTROL EOUIP BENT u Type of Control Equipment 0. C) d d ¢ zzzzz 6 _d A z Q z z e• z P- 0 - Q zz z d z 0 z C S b m N 6 7 z Q z ^ 0 cv r U. PERMIT No.: U coo z O LID H1 H IF N 0 H 0 0 00 w H a = 1c e a y c °> ac a 0 2 3 ' r w d L co w H G' d 7 U U alH 0 CO Co O ¢ F, co xz a °w ›,$y 4, 3a ow z a la v N ¢ a O J0 di Q v [.di Z a Wi m C U in V1 i H a ¢ O OOu 3 "o wmgz O u m�0 co,, • 0, ¢ ¢ a c° 0 0. N a ti N N Cd / Ln QN di N N 3 0 H 0 0 F 0 0 E z d 0 1 r - Q x CC1 GENERAL INFORMATION 0 0 0 w � 0 0 f n Seasonal Fuel Use (% of Annual Use) z di z 7 zz z w 0 z CC P u U a zz zz w roo ral E 0 zz z N U C d z Design Process Rat (Specify Units/Hour d z V N a Q z a wa o o S� o Q z Q z 0 H 0 u) a oription of Combustion U Make/Model: N Serial No.: N/A PROCESS INFORMATION 0 0 0 b z :H D U, Q a a x E section of box A.) I (900 000* 0 5u 0 x N N N z m h N N z ¢ z z z z ¢-CQ z z NTROL EO1-1PTIEN I 0. N h F 0 U 0 a F 0. Q ¢ 2 ¢ ¢ ZZZZZ ¢ a z 0. W z z z C E H ae 0 .0 2,3 0 pN .0 0 Q OR WHICH THE AC W m W o 2 F Q, i tqi 5 0 la ▪ Ea • 1 c aa -CN0 30t M o a b u c ° a 'c U V a 00`. 0o 0;2 mo v u¢ -to g tL�N w LEI ww O.] Lo CO (PP' w 4o 'a wtiz co Cal a W O ..a Pea no: {s, vt Ch Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division Stationary Sources Program Supplement to Air Pollutant Emission Notice (APEN) for Air Pollution Control Equipment SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE Facility Name and Location: Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. - Windsor Facility 2. Control Device: Type Make Dust Collector TBD ro, Arco umr Permit Number: AIRS Point ID: Model TBD Serial TBD 3. Date placed in service or last modified: .tan 2005 4. Describe the control device. Attach a diagram of the system. Also attach copies of Operation and Maintenance Instructions supplied by the manufacturer. The dust collector will collect dust emissions from the mould shop area. System diagram is attached. The O and M manual is not complete, but will be supplied print to operation. 5. List the pollutants this equipment controls and the control efficiency for each pollutant on the table below. Attach documents to support the information. Pollutant PlvI/PM10 Estimated / actual inlet pollutant concentration (Give Unit.) N/A Emission capture efficiency, To N/A Outlet pollutant concentration (Give Emits) 0.01 gr/scf Control Efficiency, % N/A 6. Description of method of handling the collected material for reuse or disposal. The collected particulate matter is managed, by using as a feedstock for the glass container manufacturing process. Once stored in the hatch house the material is used as a raw material for the manufacture of glass containers. Under typical operating conditions and ranges all of the collected material can be used, no waste will be genertted_OOO ❑ ❑ 7. Prepare a malfunction prevention and abatement plan for this pollution control system. Submit this plan with the application. This will be incorporated as a permit condition. The plan may include, but not limited to, the following: a. Operation variables such as temperature, flow rates, differemial pressures, concentrations, and other vital parameles that will be monitored in order to detect a malfunction or biedkrhrough, the coned operating range of these variables, and a detailed description of monitoring or surveillance procedures that will be used to show compliance. h. Monitoring equipment used rum iperature sensors, pressure sensors, CFMS). c. An Inspection schedule and items or conditions that will he inspected. Inspection records will be maintained at the site. d. ��\ maintenance plan to assure corn moos cumpliance. / /2103 ... -- - --- --- - --- Date Signature of Responsible Official (not a Ve.11C101 or consultant) Vice President, Manufacturing Manager, Glass Containers, North America Title Robert E I ,achmiller Name of Responsible Official (Please Print) Revised )uly 2001 HI! +'.+fitcd tie tit __. i?ll p;'n:Eu, a ,i asp PERMIT No U_ H O z z O Plant ID No. for Stack 16 • II Finished Product -Annual Output !}3 (% of Annual Use) < � EEC eg NA N;A Design Process Rate Finished Product Description (Specify Units,Hour 25 tons/hr N/A [Percent by Weicht )\ j7 N/A N/A 1 N/A NIA I N/A i I N/A G CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH THE DIVISION TO CALCULATE YOUR II(EMISSIONS. SEE "EMISSION ESTIMATES" INSTRUCTIONS ON BACK. li/' DATE: �� mot-oi-': Fuel Heating Value: (BTU/lb, BTU/gal, or BTU/scf) Moisture N/A k / I Annual Fuel Consumption Actual level (Data year level) L N/A - .... :: ' ie'r Hours/Day Days;Week Weeks/Year Dec -Feb Mar -May Jun -Aug 24 7 365 25 25 25 B. STACK OR VENT INFORMATION Identify below which stack if plant has two or mute: refer to attached sketch of plant la' I .._- _.. I ... .,c_) \\ \ Velocity N/A ft/min tJ Re uested level 62,780 tons Kind of Fuel Burned Flow Rate N/A ACFM Raw Materials Used 0 I Pei ® 'hE POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT Overall I'rlluunt Type of Control Equipment Collection Efficiency Primary I Secondary < \ / N/A N/A N/A I N/A 3m3 \ %% \~ \ la ,,.nnoc una xi -t. Li U.v-CR i}ER & REPORTABLE AIR I.I PO.UT_ANT ADDENDUM FORM TO REPORT SUCH IPOLLI_'LANTS OR POLLUTANTS NOT LISTED ABOVE. �� ISr loo::e of Person Lead, Authorized to Supply Data' I{ (A I'T•••w.1 Name and Title ,Paprl_l: Hu;nh. Environmental Lesmacr CtilS NOTICE IS VALID FOR FIVE YEARS. A revised notice shal cyrirulinn date, whenever a permit limitation must be modified, nhc is dimmed, and annually. "-Lune% cc a significant emission change one I.ee Rreahu'mn 3• Port A. • ILC.I_ : \z ay H� D. PROCESS INFORMATION Ly.escriplesu of Proecssine Unit Cu net Crusher Make 'tlodeL TBD Sena! No_ TBD C FUEL INFORMATION Description of Combustion Unit / Make/Model_ TRD Serial No. TED (\ /// \}§/\a} << :e « 2. OWENS-BROCKWAY WINDSOR PLANT CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORING (CEM) SYSTEM QUALITY ASSURANCE (QA) PLAN Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems Revision 1 - February 2006 QA Plan Page 1 of 17 WINDSOR CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORING (CEM) SYSTEM QUALITY ASSURANCE (QA) PLAN 1.0 QUALITY POLICY AND OBJECTIVES In accordance with the responsibility and policy of Owens -Brockway to operate and maintain its facilities in adherence to all applicable environmental rules and regulations, the Windsor Plant maintains the objective to provide quality environmental emissions data that are both valid and defensible. Owens- Brockway's goal to optimize continuous emission monitoring (CEM) data quality, within cost constraints, is achieved by planning, review, auditing, reporting, and corrective action. 1.1 POLICY Owens -Brockway recognizes the Importance of providing environmental emissions data of optimum quality and has established a QA policy to achieve this objective. This policy will be followed by Owens-Brockway's' Windsor Plant to ensure, assess, and document that all information produced by the CEM systems is valid and defensible 1.2 QUALITY ASSURANCE OBJECTIVES The overall objective of the Windsor QA Program is to ensure that all data generated are of known and acceptable precision, accuracy, and completeness. At a minimum, the following specific objectives will be met by the Program. • All sampling procedures, analyses, and data management procedures are thoroughly documented and are periodically reviewed and revised. Specific attention is directed to calibration procedures, standards, and traceability. Written protocols will be followed that compare data with traceable standards of higher accuracy and for comparisons with internal and external audits. • Records are maintained for all internal QC procedures and conditions that require immediate corrective action. 1.3 SPECIFIC WINDSOR CEM SYSTEM OBJECTIVES FOR PRECISION, ACCURACY, AND COMPLETENESS The Windsor monitoring program objectives for precision, accuracy, and completeness either meet or exceed the USEPA 40 CFR 60 Appendix F quality assurance requirements. The Windsor Plant's monitoring program quality assurance objectives are as follows: 1.3.1 Daily Calibration Drift: Calibration drift assessments are conducted daily for the gas monitors. If the calibration values drift by the amount given in the tables, corrective action is taken. Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems Revision 1 - February 2006 QA Plan Page 2 of 17 Whenever the daily calibration drift exceeds two times the limits of the applicable performance specification, the calibration is adjusted (Table 1). Monitor Span Value Zero Level Specification High Level Specification Action NO, (A Stack) 250 ppm ±2.5% of span ±2.5% of span ±5.0% of span NO, (B Stack) 250 ppm ±2.5% of span ±2.5% of span ±5.0% of span CO2 (A Stack) 25% ±0.5% CO2 ±0.5% CO2 ±0.5% CO2 CO2 (B Stack) 25% ±0.5% CO2 ±0.5% CO2 ±0.5% CO2 Table 1 Calibration drift adjustment criteria. 1.3.2 Quarterly Performance Evaluations: A. Cylinder Gas Audits A cylinder gas audit is performed in the three of four calendar quarters of the year. The audits are conducted at using certified gases in the ranges of 20-30% of span and 50 to 60% of span for the NO, analyzers and 4 to 6% by volume and 8 to 12% by volume for CO2 analyzers. Instrument responses will not deviate from the certified value of the appropriate gas by the following given in Table 2: Low Level 20 - 30% of Span Mid Level 50 - 60% of Span NO, ±15% ±15% Low Level 4 -6% CO2 by volume Mid Level 8-12% CO2 by volume OO2 ±15% ±15% Table 2 Quarterly cylinder gas audit criteria. 1.3.3 Annual Performance Evaluations An annual relative accuracy audit is conducted on the gas monitoring systems. The Relative Accuracy of the NO, and OO2 analyzers shall be less than 20%. The Relative Accuracy for the OO2 analyzer is calculated as the arithmetic difference between the RM and CEMS output for each run. The average difference of the nine runs shall be no greater than 1.0% CO2, 1.3.4 Data Availability: Data availability of the gas and opacity monitoring systems at the Windsor Plant will be greater than 95% on an annual basis by unit, based on unit operating time. Percentage data availability is calculated as: % Availability = Total unit operating hours for which quality -assured data were recorded x 100 Eq.1 Total unit operating hours Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems Revision 1 - February 2006 QA Plan Page 3 of 17 Note : Percent system/analyzer data availability is not computed during furnace outage (e.g. hours in which the furnace is not operating). Source operation hours are those hours during which the furnace is fired. 1.4 THE QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN To meet these objectives, this Quality Assurance Plan has been developed, which constitutes the contents of this section of the manual and has been prepared in response to the requirements of the Authority to Construct. This Quality Assurance Manual describes the Windsor Plant CEM system and the detailed procedures developed to achieve the Quality Assurance objectives stated above. For the purposes of the Windsor Plant CEM QA program, the QA Manual is regarded as the operational manual for implementing the Plan. 1.5 UPDATES TO THE QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN To maintain currency with operational and management procedures, this quality assurance plan will be reviewed annually. Changes in regulatory requirements, equipment, standard operating procedures, or quality assurance policies will be incorporated in the revisions as appropriate. 2.0 DOCUMENT CONTROL SYSTEM 2.1 INTRODUCTION A system of document control has been established to identify by number and date each written section of the QA Manual or revisions thereof, in order to determine procedures used at any given time. This document control system details responsibility for preparing procedures or revisions. It includes approval mechanisms, distribution routings, a numbering scheme, and a method for document control maintenance. 2.2 PREPARATION OF SECTIONS The Combustion/Environmental Engineer has primary responsibility for the assignment and preparation of sections to be included in the QA Manual. 2.3 REVISION OF THE QA MANUAL The Combustion/Environmental Engineer has primary responsibility for annual review and revisions to the Manual . 2.4 DISTRIBUTION OF THE MANUAL New sections or revisions of sections are distributed by the Combustion/Environmental Engineer to plant personnel actively involved with the CEM system. All copies of the Manual are uniquely numbered and signed for by recipients. Recipients of the manual will return the manual to the Combustion/Environmental Engineer upon termination or job change. 2.5 NUMBERING SYSTEM FOR THE QA MANUAL All sections of the QA Manual are numbered according to the following scheme, for which the following information will appear in the upper right-hand corner of each page: • Section Number • Page Number The following information will appear in the upper left-hand corner of each page: • Revision Number • Date Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems Revision 1 - February 2006 QA Plan Page 4 of 17 All Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) of the Quality Assurance Manual are numbered according to the following scheme, for which the following information will appear in the upper right-hand corner of each page: • SOP Number • Page Number The following information will appear in the upper left-hand corner of each page: • Revision Number • Date The SOP numbers are assigned according to the following outline: Revision numbers will be assigned by the . Any new or unrevised sections will have a revision number of zero (0). Pagination will be assigned according to the number of the page within the sections (e.g., "Page 2 of 3"). Revisions that extend beyond the page limit will be labeled with alphabetic characters, beginning with the letter "a" (e.g., "Page 4a of 10"). In addition, a notation of additional pages will be made on the preceding page at the bottom (e.g. "Page 4a follows"). 2.6 SYSTEM MAINTENANCE FOR THE PROGRAM The Combustion/Environmental Engineer will be responsible for maintenance of the QA Program. This includes maintaining the current master copy of the QA manual, a current distribution list, and historical procedure files. 2.7 FREQUENCY OF REVISION The plan will be reviewed annually, for possible revisions. Changes in regulatory requirements, equipment, standard operating procedures, or quality assurance policies will be incorporated in the revisions as appropriate. 2.8 MANUAL REVISIONS The manual is provided in both hard copy and diskette form. Text has been entered using MS Word for Windows word processing program for the IBM PC and compatibles . 3.0 ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES The Windsor Plant emissions monitoring program is maintained and operated by Windsor and contracted personnel and is supported by the Owns -Brockway corporate office. The Owens -Brockway corporate office is located in Coolville, Ohio. 3.1 WINDSOR CEM SYSTEM QA/QC ORGANIZATION The Windsor Plant organization related to the operation and maintenance of the emissions monitoring program is given in Figure 2. Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems Revision 1 - February 2006 QA Plan Page 5 of 17 Environmental Administrator (CENTS) Plant Manager Plant Engineer Batch & Furnace Sups visor Health & Safety Director Furnace Operators Combustion/Environmental Engineer Figure 2 Windsor CEM QA/QC Organization 3.2 RESPONSIBILITIES Responsibilities of Windsor personnel involved in the emissions monitoring program are given below: 3.2.1 Plant Manager, Windsor Plant • Supports the Windsor CEM QA/QC program. • Allocates resources for the operation and maintenance of the CEM systems • Approves staff allocations 3.2.2 Plant Engineer Requests corrective maintenance when system failures occur 3.2.3 Batch & Furnace Supervisor Maintains furnace operating conditions to be in compliance with emission limitations specified by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment. Monitors ESC Data Acquisition System Screens periodically to assess gas pollutant and diluent levels with respect to furnace operation. • Monitors ESC Data Acquisition System Screens for alarms. • Notes alarms and system problems in logbook • in the event a problem occurs, contacts the Combustion/Environmental Engineer. • Calls in support when required during off -shift hours. 3.2.4 Combustion/Environmental Engineer • Acts as the Windsor Plant contact with Owens -Brockway Corporate Environmental Administrator • Reviews daily inspection reports • Reviews emissions data for accuracy and completeness. Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems Revision 1 - February 2006 QA Plan Page 6 of 17 • Reviews logbook entries. • Conducts weekly walk-through inspections of the CEM systems. • Coordinates and schedules external QA performance audits (RATAs, etc.). • Coordinates and schedules quarterly external preventive maintenance • Coordinates resources for corrective maintenance when necessary • Maintains spare parts inventory - maintains sufficient quantities to meet availability objectives. • Provides for personnel training as necessary. • Prepares required monthly and quarterly reports. • Reviews and revises the CEM QA/QC Manual annually 3.2.5 Furnace Operators • Perform daily inspections of the CEM systems as specified in SOP:2 • Monthly, complete gas cylinder check sheet • Log and report all malfunction events. • Hourly, check NO, emission readings for compliance with emission limits. • Respond to alarms and request corrective maintenance where failure is observed or imminent. • Inform the Combustion/Environmental Engineer when monitoring system problems occur. 3.3 PERSONNEL TRAINING Training is provided for personnel required to respond to alarms or to inspect or work on the equipment. Training is on-the-job training (job shadowing), where experienced personnel instruct new or inexperienced personnel in the procedures associated with inspecting, operating, or maintaining the CEM systems and CEM system records. 3.4 RESPONSIBILITIES - CRITICAL TASK LIST Responsibilities for the operation and maintenance of the CEM systems are summarized in the critical task list given in Table 3. This list is provided here, and posted on the instrument cabinet door in the CEM room to provide a ready reference in cases of emergencies or when questions regarding CEM system responsibilities arise. Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems Revision 1 - February 2006 QA Plan Page 7 of 17 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. — Windsor, CO Furnace A an B NOx CEMs Critical Task List Frequency Task Who? On -going Log all periods of CEMs downtime in the log book. Include date, time, and description of work. Person making entry needs to initial entry and enter Reason and Action code in the "Alarm Toolbox" on the DAS. Furnace Operator On -going Place CEMs operation to "Off Line" prior to conducting any maintenance activity and return to "On Line" upon completion.. Maintenance Provider On -going Check DAS for alarms by reviewing the "Home" DAS screen and each CEMs status panel. If alarm is present, follow established reporting instructions. Color code is as follows: Green = OK; System healthy Yellow = Caution Red = CEMs fault and generating invalid data Blue = CEM in calibration Furnace Operator Once per shift Complete shift check sheet Furnace Operator Daily Review daily calibration report to ensure a successful calibration for each monitor has occurred. A CEMs cal is scheduled to occur at 7:02 am. B CEMs cal is scheduled to occur at 7:22 am. (Note: DAS time does not adjust for daylight savings time). Cal report will auto print to the printer @ 8:05 AM. If a cal failure occurs, follow established reporting instructions. Furnace Operator Quarterly Coordinate ESC's visit to conduct quarterly preventative maintenance and to perform quarterly certified cal gas audit (CGA).. Combustion Engineer Annual Conduct annual Relative Accuracy Test Audit (RATA) for each CEMs Combustion Engineer On -going Notify Colorado Department of health if either CEMs is inoperable for greater than 24 hrs. Combustion Engineer Support Telephone Numbers: O -I: Jim Amburgey; Office: 419-247-7909; Cell: 419-944-9967 Table 3 Furnace And B N0x CEMs critical task list. Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems Revision 1 - February 2006 QA Plan Page 8 of 17 4.0 QUALITY CONTROL - CALIBRATION Independent reference standards are used to establish a relationship between gas monitor outputs and known values traceable to the National Institute of Standards and Technology. For the opacity monitors, internal reference calibration values are utilized to establish a relationship to the opacity monitor measurements. The calibrations of the gas monitors are checked once every 24 hours. Criteria for monitor calibration drift are given in 40 CFR 60 Appendix B - Performance Specification 2 and 3. Detailed calibration procedures are given in SOP:1. 4.1 THE CALIBRATION REQUIREMENT Calibration references and test methods are utilized to establish a relationship between monitor measurements and known inputs. It is important to note the difference between the terms calibration check and calibration adjustment. Calibration checks constitute the input of a known reference to register a response on the system output. A calibration adjustment is a response to the reference that involves the change of a control or instrument setting. 4.2 FREQUENCY OF CALIBRATION CHECKS The monitors perform daily calibration checks. Emissions data are not obtained during the monitor calibration checks. Calibration checks are also performed when any of the following events occur: • After repair of a monitor malfunction. • After replacement of any major component of a monitor. • After a span or zero check tolerance limit has been exceeded and adjustments or repairs are performed to bring the monitor back into control. • After an instrument has been shut off for more than one day. • If the plant is down for more than one day, a calibration check is performed within 8 hours after startup. On operator judgment of high or low gas emissions or opacity, or doubt as to the validity of reading. On operator judgment (e.g., indicated power fluctuations, unusually noisy baseline, abnormally high or low results, non -deviating readout, or other unusual events). A calibration check is repeated after a calibration adjustment is performed in response to exceeding specified tolerance limits. 4.3 CALIBRATION ADJUSTMENT AND OUT -OF -CONTROL CONDITIONS 4.3.1 Criteria for Adjustment Adjustment of the NO,, and CO2 gas monitors is necessary if the zero or span drift exceeds twice the performance specification 2 x 2.5% = 5.0% of span for the NO, analyzers and 2 x 0.5%CO2 = 1.0% CO2% span for the CO2 analyzers. Adjustment of the opacity monitors is necessary if the zero or span drift exceeds 4% opacity. 4.3.2 Out -of -control Conditions A NO, analyzer or CO2 analyzer is out -of -control if the calibration drift exceeds twice the drift performance specification (2 x 2.5% = 5.0% of span for the NO, analyzers and 2 x 0.5%CO2 = 1.0% CO2 for the CO2 analyzer for five consecutive days. The beginning of the out -of -control period is the time corresponding to the completion of the fifth, consecutive, daily calibration drift check with a CD in excess of 5%. folcurrIng Cycle( Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems Revision 1 - February 2006 QA Plan Page 9 of 17 An NO, analyzer or CO2 analyzer is out of control if the calibration drift exceeds four times the drift performance specification (4 x 2.5% = 10.0% of span for the NO. analyzers and 4 x 0.5%O2 = 2.0% CO2 for the CO2 analyzers for any one day). The out -of -control period is the time corresponding to the daily CD check preceding the daily CD check that results in a CD in excess of 10% Data that are out -of -control are not used in counting emission compliance nor counted towards meeting data availability requirements. 4.3.3 Quality Control Charts (Optional) Quality control charts can be used to identify nonrandom data patterns from the daily calibration drift checks. Control Charts can be generated for both zero and span calibration error checks. Figure 3 illustrates possible non-random patterns that can develop. Quality control charts can be evaluated with respect to such patterns in order to anticipate incipient instrument malfunctions. Moil Poirot1Oa( 0G11Idf llmti Chlingt in L,viI Tamil Figure 3 Possible quality control chart non-random patterns. 4.5 DAILY ZERO AND SPAN CHECKS AND RECORDS Monitor zero and span data are reviewed daily by the Furnace Operators and reviewed, at a minimum weekly, by the Combustion/Environmental Engineer. Action is taken if any gas monitor daily drift exceeds 5.0% or if a daily opacity monitor drift exceeds 4.0%. Drift results are printed from both the ESC data acquisition system. The daily calibration sheets are stapled to the daily inspection form and are filed. 5.0 QUALITY CONTROL - PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE Preventive maintenance is performed on a routine schedule. In practice, preventive maintenance is performed quarterly, under contract, for maintenance of the A and B Furnace CEM systems. Preventive maintenance activities include inspecting and checking system components, cleaning, and replacing components. Depending on the system component, the period of replacement or maintenance may be from six months to a year or more. Preventive or routine maintenance is defined as: "an orderly program of positive actions (equipment cleaning, adjustments and/or testing, lubricating, reconditioning) for preventing failure of monitoring parts and systems during their use." Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems Revision 1 - February 2006 QA Plan Page 10 of 17 Monitoring systems contain components that have limited lifetimes. Degradation in signal intensity, excessive calibration drift, or inconsistent data indicate reduction in performance of these components. 5.1 OVERVIEW OF PROCEDURES The Windsor program of preventive maintenance is based on observations made during the weekly checks and experience gained from situations where corrective action was necessary. The gas monitors receive specified periodic and scheduled maintenance through the use of monthly and annual maintenance forms. For the A and B Furnace monitoring systems, preventive maintenance is performed on the stack probes and dilution subsystems, air clean-up system, and analyzers. Filters that remove particulate matter are cleaned or replaced periodically. Desiccants, filtering, and scrubbing materials are also replaced periodically. Fittings, valves, and sample lines are inspected and repaired or replaced when necessary. Gas bottle pressures, flow rates, valves and fittings are inspected on the gas delivery systems used for the daily calibration checks. The monitoring systems contain components that have limited lifetimes. Lamps have given performance periods and are replaced as needed. Degradation in signal intensity indicates reduction in performance. Optical windows are cleaned routinely, and components such as chopper motors and internal optical filters are inspected periodically. The gas delivery systems and clean air supply system for the NOx and CO2 analyzers are checked routinely. These procedures include inspecting flow rates, and monitoring cylinder gas pressures and supply. 5.2 REVISION TO THE PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE The preventive maintenance schedule is changed as required to establish component replacement or repair dates. Experience gained, in conjunction with the preventive maintenance procedures, enables component failure rates to be estimated. It is intended that the preventive maintenance schedule be modified, based upon experience with the CEM systems, specifically: • If a checked item shows frequent problems, the frequency of checking that item should be increased, or • If a checked item shows no change over an extended period of time and number of checks, the frequency of checking that item could be reduced. 5.3 REPORTS Performance of the scheduled preventive maintenance procedure is recorded into the CEM system logbooks. All calibration and maintenance activities are recorded, dated, and signed by the person carrying out the activity. The record of reports and logbook entries provide the written history of the CEM system and monitor performance. These records provide information necessary to: • revise preventive maintenance schedules as appropriate • adjust spare parts procedures or inventories • track and investigate analyzer downtime patterns • relate CEM system problems to unit operations or environmental conditions • support prompt troubleshooting and corrective action, and • enable improved preventive maintenance procedures to be developed. CEM documentation, including the CEM logbook is located in the Furnace Control Room. Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems Revision 1 - February 2006 QA Plan Page 11 of 17 6.0 QUALITY CONTROL - CORRECTIVE ACTION Corrective action (also termed corrective maintenance or non -routine maintenance) is performed when the system or part of the system fails. Corrective action activities are "non -routine work." A failure of the system may just occur, or it may be uncovered during an operation check or while conducting routine maintenance, or it may be discovered during a performance audit. Experience, in conjunction with the preventive maintenance procedures enables component failure rates to be estimated. The preventive maintenance schedule is changed routinely to establish component replacement or repair dates, consistent with failure rates. Corrective action is generally associated with monitoring system failures. In such situations, data are either questionable or the monitoring system is considered "unavailable" for providing reportable data. 6.1 CORRECTIVE ACTION PROCEDURE Problems in the monitoring system components are minimized through the implementation of routine inspection and maintenance schedules. Where problems develop that require corrective action, the system is repaired as soon as possible. Problems in the dilution extractive systems are typically due to filter plugging, corrosion, or associated sample line problems. Procedures recommended in the individual instrument maintenance manuals are used to troubleshoot circuit boards and components. In the case of severe electronic problems, the analyzer is returned to the manufacturer for repair. 6.2 REPORTS CEM system problems and corrective actions performed are recorded in the CEM system Logbook. 7.0 QUALITY CONTROL - PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS A performance evaluation is an independent check of the system and can vary in its scope. Performance evaluations are designed to provide independent assessments of monitor performance. An independent assessment using an appropriate auditing technique can provide an indication of data validity. 7.1 REQUIRED TEST PROCEDURES The following tests are conducted for the monitoring systems: Quarterly Cylinder Gas Test (Performed for three calendar quarters) A challenge of the monitoring system with protocol cylinder gases at three gas concentrations or opacity filter values in the following ranges: Low level: Mid Level: 20-30%of span 50-60%of span Annual Relative Accuracy Test Audit For gases, a repeat of the relative accuracy test procedures as specified in 40 CFR 60 Appendix B. Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems Revision 1 - February 2006 QA Plan Page 12 of 17 7.2 The Quarterly Cylinder Gas Audit (CGA) Quarterly cylinder gas audits are conducted on each gas analyzer as per the procedure given in 40 CFR 60 Appendix F. The procedure requires challenging the CEM system using certified gases, with the point of entry being as close to the probe as possible. The CGA is conducted, using protocol gases at 20-30% of full scale, and 50-60% of full scale. Each gas analyzer is challenged three times, non -consecutively with each audit gas, at the system calibration gas injection port. The port is to be located such that the calibration gas passes through all filters, scrubbers, conditioners, and other monitor components used during normal sampling, and through as much of the sampling probe as is practical. These conditions are achieved in the design of the out -of - stack dilution probe using the calibration line. The cylinder gas audit is acceptable for NO, and CO2 analyzers if the average of the responses for each reference gas does not exceed the calibration gas certified value by more than 15.0%. The cylinder gas audit results are also acceptable if the absolute value of the difference between the average of the monitor response values and the average of the reference values, IR - A I is less than or equal to 5 ppm. The calculations for the Cylinder Gas Audit are as follows: ICm - Cal A - x 100 Ca where: A =Linearity Error of the CEM analyzer (in terms of %) Cm = average of the three system responses to the low- , mid-, and high -value calibration gas, % or ppm. Ca = certified value of the calibration gas introduced into the system, % or ppm Calculations are performed either in ppm or percent, as applicable to the monitor. 7.3 RELATIVE ACCURACY TEST AUDIT (RATA) 7.3.1 Gas Monitoring Systems Eq. 2 A repeat of the Relative Accuracy Test is conducted annually for the NO,, CO2, and flow. Test procedures are the same as those required for initial certification with reference to 40 CFR 60 Appendix B - Performance Specification 2 for the NO, monitors and Performance Specification 3 for the CO2 analyzers. Reference Methods used for the gas analyzers are the automated, alternate test methods established by the U.S. EPA in 40 CFR 60 Appendix A: Methods 3A (CO2), and 7E (NO,). Manual The relative accuracy for the gas analyzers is calculated in the same manner as in the initial CEM system certification. The calculation is identical between 40 CFR 60 Appendix B requirements. Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems Revision 1 - February 2006 QA Plan Page 13 of 17 where: RA Idl IccI RA = IdI + Iccl x 100 RM = Relative Accuracy in percent = absolute value of the mean difference between the CEM and RM test measurements = absolute value of the confidence coefficient RM = average Test Method value Eq. 3 The calculations are performed in units of the standard (Ibs/hr). The relative accuracy shall not exceed 20%, calculated in units of the standard (lbs/hr. 7.4 OUT -OF -CONTROL CONDITIONS The following out -of -control conditions are specified in 40 CFR 60 Appendix F. 7. 4.1 Cylinder Gas Audit Out -of -Control Conditions An out -of -control period occurs when the error in any of the two concentrations of the cylinder gas audit exceeds 15%. The out -of -control period begins with the time corresponding to the completion of sampling of the failed cylinder gas audit and ends upon completion of a satisfactory cylinder gas audit or RATA following corrective action and/or monitor repair. 7.4.2 Relative Accuracy Out -of -Control Conditions - Gas Monitoring Systems CEM system gas analyzers are considered "out -of -control" when the relative accuracy is greater than 20.0 9/0 of the average reference method value. The out -of -control period begins with the time corresponding to the completion of failed RATA and ends upon completion of a satisfactory RATA following corrective action and/or monitor repair. 7.6 QUALITY CONTROL FOR RELATIVE ACCURACY TESTS Relative accuracy tests are performed by a contracted source testing firm. Responsibilities during the test are clearly defined. The roles of the source test team leader, source testers, and Windsor personnel should be understood prior to the test . If the organization of the test and activities associated with the participants are clearly stated, less confusion will occur during the test period. QA Objectives Objectives for data precision, accuracy, completeness, representativeness, and comparability are to be defined prior to the test. Test Conditions Conditions for representativeness in terms of unit load conditions, sampling conditions, procedures for treating data in case of unit shutdown, etc., are addressed before testing. During the testing, the plant operates either under specified load levels . Reference method data and analyzer data are taken at the same time and compared over the same period. Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems Revision 1 - February 2006 QA Plan Page 14 of 17 Calibration Procedures and Frequency In the calibration of the reference method analyzers, Protocol gases are used. Prior to conducting the relative accuracy test, calibration gases used to span the analyzer are compared with the Protocol gases used to calibrate the reference method instrumentation. This comparison assists in determining systematic errors attributable to calibration gas values. Data Reduction Validation and Reporting All data and calculations are to be checked independently by Owens -Brockway. Internal Quality Control Checks The source testing firm should incorporate its own quality control checks in its testing procedures. These are to include as a minimum, instrument verification checks such as those for linearity and interferences specified in 40 CFR 60 Appendix A of the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations. 8.0 RECORDS AND REPORTS Records are maintained on CEM operation and maintenance through the use of logbooks and check lists. Excess emissions data are reported to the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment. 8.1 CEM System Documentation (Records and Internal Reports) Records of monitoring system design, maintenance, performance, and data are maintained at the Oakland Plant, which are not necessarily reported, but are available for review. Long term storage of completed check sheets, calibration records and log books are kept in the Environmental Engineering Supervisor's Office. The following documentation is kept and maintained. CEM QA/QC Manual A copy of the CEM system QA manual is kept in the Combustion/Environmental Engineer's Office and the Furnace Control Room. • Control Charts (Optional) Obtainable from the data acquisition systems on demand. Daily CEM System Check Sheets Blank and completed daily check sheets are kept in the check sheets binder located in the Furnace Control Room. Daily Calibration Report Obtainable from the data acquisition systems on demand. General Average Report Obtainable from the data acquisition systems on demand. Total Glass Pulled Report Obtainable from the data acquisition systems on demand. Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems Revision 1 - February 2006 QA Plan Page 15 of 17 CEM System Logbooks Information contained in the log book includes the date, time and name of the person performing maintenance on the CEM systems. All CEM system problems including alarms, maintenance performed, notification numbers created, observations and adjustments made to the CEM system, are logged in the log book. Instrument Manuals Instrument Operation and Maintenance manuals containing detailed procedures referred to by this QA/QC Manual are kept in the CEM System desk and the Combustion/Environmental Engineer's Office. 8.2 Long Term Storage Records and documents greater than 2 years old are stored in the Combustion/Environmental Engineer's Office. 8.3 External Reports Monthly Reports of excess emissions are provided to Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment. Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems Revision 1 - February 2006 QA Plan Page 16 of 17 References Carlyle, T. E. 1995. Quality Assurance Plans for Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems: Compliance with 40 CFR 75. In Proceedings --- Acid Rain & Electric Utilities - Permits, Allowances, Monitoring, & Meteorology. Air & Waste Management Association, Pittsburgh. pp. 589-593. Dvorak, K.J. 1996. How to develop a quality assurance/quality control manual. Paper presented at the Air & Waste Management Association Meeting, Nashville TN. Paper 96-WP67.01. Electric Power Research Institute. 2002. Continuous Emission Monitoring Guidelines: 2002 Update. Report EPRI 1004179. Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto. Environmental Protection Agency. 1976 (1/9/84 update). Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems, Volume I --- Principles. EPA 600/9-76-005. Environmental Protection Agency. 1977. (11/5/85 update). Calculations and Interpretation of Accuracy for Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems (GEMS). Section 3.0.7. Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems, Volume II --- Ambient Air specific Methods. EPA 600/4-77- 027a. Environmental Protection Agency. 1977. (6/1/86 update). Continuous Emission Monitoring (GEM) Systems Good Operating Practices. Section 3.0.9. Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems, Volume III --- Stationary Source Specific Methods. EPA 600/4-77-027b. Environmental Protection Agency. 1977. (11/26/85 update). Guideline for Developing Quality Control Procedures for Gaseous Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems. Section 3.0.10. Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems, Volume III --- Stationary Source Specific Methods. EPA 600/4-77-027b Flaherty, E. Bartel, D., Zaicow, T., Grant, D. 1998. Potential Pitfalls in Using Multi -Component EPA Protocol Mixtures. CEM Users Group Meeting - May 1998. Electric Power Research Institute. Palo Alto, CA. Gschwandtner, G. and Winkler, J.P. 1997. Effective Auditing of CEM Systems. In proceedings of Acid Rain & Electric Utilities II - Scottsdale, AZ. Air & Waste Management Association. Pittsburgh. pp. 781- 796. Jahnke, J.A. 1994. An Operator's Guide to Eliminating Bias in CEM Systems. U.S. EPA. EPA 430-R- 94-016, November 1994. Jahnke, J. A. 1995. Eliminating Bias in CEM Systems. In Proceedings --- Acid Rain & Electric Utilities - Permits, Allowances, Monitoring, & Meteorology. Air & Waste Management Association, Pittsburgh. pp. 391-400. Jahnke, J.A. 2000. Continuous Emission Monitoring - 2nd Edition. John Wiley and Sons. NY, Jahnke, J.A. and Johnson, W.E. 2003. Continuous Emission Monitoring (CEM) System Application and Maintenance Guide. EPRI Report 1009057. Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto. Jahnke, J.A. and Marshall, R.P. 1994. Pressure and Temperature Effects in Dilution Extractive Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems. Electric Power Research Institute. Palo Alto, CA. Report TR-104700. Jahnke, J.A. and Peeler, J.W. 1997. A Handbook for Continuous Emissions Monitoring Systems for Non -Criteria Pollutants. Environmental Protection Agency. Center for Environmental Research Information. Cincinnati, OH. EPA/625/R-97/001. Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems Revision 1 - February 2006 QA Plan Page 17 of 17 Logan, T.J. and Midgett, M.R. 1979. Quality Assurance Programs to Support the Use of Continuous Emission Monitors for Direct Compliance. Proceedings - Specialty Conference on: Quality Assurance in Air Pollution Measurement. Air Poll. Control Assoc. pp. 413-418. Miller, S.B. 1994. Certification and Utilization of Multicomponent EPA Protocol Gases. Paper presented at EPRI CEM Users Group Meeting, Minneapolis, MN. April 1994. Myers, R.L. 1986. Field Experiences Using Dilution Probe Techniques for Continuous Source Emission Monitoring. Transactions - Continuous Emission Monitoring - Advances and Issues. Air Poll. Control Assoc. pp. 431-439. Reynolds, W.E. 1989. Field Inspector's Audit Techniques: Gas CEMS's Which Accept Calibration Gases. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. EPA/340/1-89-003 Scott, N. E. 1995. The Care and Feeding of Your GEMS. In Proceedings --- Acid Rain & Electric Utilities - Permits, Allowances, Monitoring, & Meteorology. Air & Waste Management Association, Pittsburgh. pp. 594-601. U.S. EPA 1997. EPA Traceability Protocol for Assay and Certification of Gaseous Calibration Standards. EPA -600/R-97/121. U.S. Government. 2005. Test Methods. Code of Federal Regulations -Protection of the Environment. 40 CFR 60 Appendix A. U.S. Government. 2005. Performance Specifications. Code of Federal Regulations - Protection of the Environment. 40 CFR 60 Appendix B. Winkler, J., DuPree. J. and Gschwandtner, G. 1999. Elements of an Effective QA Program. In proceedings of Electric Utilities Environmental Conference. Tucson, AZ. Wohlschlegel, P. 1976. Guidelines for Development of a Quality Assurance Program - Volume XV - Determination of Sulfur Dioxide Emissions from Stationary Sources by Continuous Monitors. EPA 650/4-74-005o. OWENS-BROCKWAY GLASS CONTAINER, INC. WINDSOR, COLORADO CONTINUOUS MONITORING SYSTEMS QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL MANUAL Prepared by: Source Technology Associates PO Box 12609 RTP, NC 27709 (919) 929-4447 OWENS-BROCKWAY GLASS CONTAINER, INC. WINDSOR, COLORADO CONTINUOUS MONITORING SYSTEMS QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL MANUAL Reviewed and Approved by: Date Date TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Forward Executive Regulatory Summary SYSTEM DESCRIPTION WINDSOR PLANT CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORING (CEM) SYSTEM QUALITY ASSURANCE (QA) PLAN STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES SOP: 1 Calibration Procedures SOP: 2 Daily Inspection Procedures SOP: 3 Weekly Inspection Procedures SOP: 4 Preventive Maintenance Procedures SOP: 5 Corrective Maintenance Procedures SOP: 6 Audit Procedure 1 - Cylinder Gas Audits SOP: 7 Audit Procedure 2 - Relative Accuracy Test Audits SOP: 9 Data Back-up Procedures SOP:10 CEM System Security SOP:11 Records and Reporting Procedures APPENDICES Appendix I: Windsor Plant Authority to Construct Appendix II: Blank Forms FORWARD In accordance with the responsibility and policy of Owens -Brockway to operate and maintain its facilities in strict adherence to all applicable environmental rules and regulations, the Windsor, CO Plant maintains the objective to provide quality environmental emissions data that are both valid and defensible. The goal of Owens -Brockway is to optimize the data quality of its Continuous Emission Monitoring systems within cost constraints, by applying proper planning, review, auditing, reporting, and corrective action procedures. This Quality Assurance/Quality Control Manual has been prepared to both document the Windsor Plant emission monitoring system quality assurance policies and to document the quality control procedures through which the policies are implemented on a day -to-day basis. EXECUTIVE REGULATORY SUMMARY Air emissions from the Owens -Brockway Windsor Plant are regulated by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment through the requirements of Construction Permit No. 03WE1151, the Windsor Plant monitors the A and B Furnace emission rates of nitrogen oxides and the carbon dioxide concentration of in each Furnace stack. Continuous Emission Monitoring (CEM) systems have been installed to conduct this monitoring on a continuous basis. The installed CEM systems conform to the design and performance specification of the U.S. EPA Code of Federal Regulations, 40 CFR 60 Appendix B, and are operated according to the quality assurance and quality control procedures given in 40 CFR 60 Appendix F. This quality assurance manual has been prepared as specified in Appendix F and meets the criteria of ISO 9000 for quality assurance programs. This manual describes the various CEM systems installed at the Plant, provides the Quality Assurance Plan developed for the CEM systems, and details the step-by- step operation and maintenance activities conducted by plant personnel to assure that quality data are generated by the monitoring instrumentation. OWENS-BROCKWAY WINDSOR PLANT CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORING (CEM) SYSTEM SYSTEM DESCRIPTION Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems System Description Revision 0 — February 2006 Page 1 of 22 DESCRIPTION OF THE OWENS-BROCKWAY WINDSOR CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORING SYSTEMS Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems (CEM Systems) have been installed at the Windsor Plant in response to the Authority to Construct issued by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment requiring the reporting of emissions that exceed permit limits. This quality assurance manual describes the installed monitoring systems, the Quality Assurance Plan (QAP) instituted to assure data quality, and the Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) applied to provide for quality control. 1.0 THE WINDSOR PLANT The Owens -Brockway glass container plant located in Windsor, CO, uses two glass melting furnaces (Furnaces A and B) in the manufacture of beer bottles. The furnaces melt a mix of raw materials that include sand, limestone, soda ash, salt cake and additives. The batch materials enter the furnace through a feeder and float on the top of the molten glass already in the furnace. These materials melt and move forward to the front of the furnace, from where molten glass is delivered to the forming machines. The furnaces utilize natural gas and on -site generated oxygen for combustion. Each furnace is designed for a rate of 430 tons of glass per day r, in a two checker arrangement, where the combustion air flow heats one checker, while the combustion air flow through the other checker, recovering a portion of the thermal energy of the flue gas. The furnaces are fired using natural gas, each furnace operating at a nominal heat input of 60 mmBTU/Hr. The furnace temperature is maintained in the range of 2200 °F to 2900 °F. Typical flue gas characteristics are given in Table 1. Parameter Typical Ranges SO2 300 - 400 ppm NOx 20 - 250 ppm CO2 8.0 -10 % H20 13% Stack Temperature 800 °F Temperature - C Duct 500 °F Flow Rate 15,000 scfm Opacity - C Stack < 5% Table 1 Windsor flue gas characteristics. Two stacks, A and B, exhaust from their respective furnaces. The plant currently monitors the stacks for NOx mass emission rate as per the requirements of the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment. The CEM System probe location for the A Furnace is shown in Figure 1. Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems Revision 0 — February 2006 an MW Ac N -r H, CID 'MOM _ .m+° Rtv ni-. lit: ril .9 AMY, OT —PI), owm 4W cmr 4 Figure 1 CEM System probe location for the A Furnace. System Description Page 2 of 22 MK OAK In, ,ac music (1V) Ana nn Ili -e or UONCLO4 air w� Of RKni The probe location and source testing platforms for both the A and B furnaces are accessible by catwalks. 2.0 EMISSION LIMITATIONS Emissions of air pollutants are limited by the requirements of the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Construction Permit No. 03WE1151. Emission limits for NOx are as follows: 19.2 tons NOx per month 230.8 tons NOx per year Compliance with the yearly emission limit is based on a rolling twelve month total. During the first twelve moths of operation, compliance with both the monthly and yearly emission limitations is required. After twelve months, compliance with only the yearly imitation is required. The product of the NOx concentration and flue gas volumetric flow rate. The flow rates in each stack are determined using CO2 emission data in conjunction with an F -factor equation. Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems System Description Revision 0 — February 2006 Page 3 of 22 3.0 THE CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORING SYSTEMS The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment through Construction Permit No. 03W E1151 (Section 12), requires the installation of continuous emission monitoring systems for the monitoring of NOx emissions on the A and B stacks for the determination of compliance with the emission limitations given above. Identical systems are installed on the A and B Furnace stacks each including an M&C Model SP2000H out -of -stack dilution probe. Teledyne API Model 200E NOx Analyzers are used to monitor NOx emissions from Furnace A and B. Teledyne API Model 360E CO2 analyzers are used for monitoring CO2 emissions and calculating the flue gas volumetric flow of each stack. The M&C probe unit on the A Furnace Stack is shown in Figure 2. Figure 2 CEM installation on A Furnace Stack. The M&C probe unit on the B Furnace stack is shown in Figure 3. Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems System Description Revision 0 — February 2006 Page 4 of 22 Figure 3 B Furnace Stack and M&C dilution probe housing. The CEM Systems analyzers are located in the Furnace Control Room approximately 90 ft. from the stacks. One instrument rack incorporates both the A and B stack analyzers, and ESC Model 8832 datalogger, two ESC Model 1401 dilution controllers, two warning panels, and an uninterruptible power supply. Dilution air clean-up systems are located on the wall of the room, and an ESC data acquisition system computer is located on a desk next to the instrument rack. The system components located in the furnace control room are shown in Figure 4. Figure 4 The Windsor CEM system — Furnace Control Room. Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems Revision 0 — February 2006 System Description Page 5 of 22 The manufacturer's model numbers, and serial numbers for the components incorporated in the CEM system are given in Table 2. Equipment Supplier Manufacturer/Model Serial No. A Furnace Duct NOx Analyzer Teledyne-Monitor/API Model 200E 794 Carbon Dioxide Monitor Teledyne-Monitor/API Model 360E 088 Dilution Extractive System M&C Products Model SP2000H 11091/521116 Dilution Controller ESC Model 1401 162 B Furnace Stack NOx Analyzer Teledyne-Monitor/API Model 200E 42C-76855-385 Carbon Dioxide Monitor Teledyne-Monitor/API Model 360E 089 Dilution Extractive System M&C Products Model SP2000H 11091/521116 Dilution Controller ESC Model 1401 164 Common Components Datalogger ESC 8832 A0957 DAS Computer Dell Precision P4 D1 BRJ71 External Modem US Robotics 56K External support 2ABLX2LF4864 Printer HP Laser Jet 1320 CNDC52H4ST Keyboard Dell QuietKey CN-04N454-37172-531-03EJ LCD Monitor Dell 1905FP UltraSharp CN-0T6116-71618-52N-A069 UPS APC RS 800 WB0505236360 Table 2 A and B Furnace Stack Monitoring System Components Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems System Description Revision 0 — February 2006 Page 6 of 22 5.0 A and B STACK CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORING SYSTEMS The monitoring systems are designed to measure NOx and calculate flue gas flow to determine NOx emissions in units of lbs/hr and tons/year. Wet basis dilution system gas measurements are used in conjunction with a flue gas volumetric flow calculation to calculate the emission rate of NO, from the furnace. The NO, emissions are calculated according to the following expression: pmr = csQ Eq. 1 where: pmr is the pollutant mass rate in lbs/hr cs is the NO, gas concentration, Q is the flue gas volumetric flow. The gas monitoring systems installed are extractive dilution system originally integrated by Environmental Systems Corporation of Knoxville, TN. The system is designed to measure NOx and CO2 and to calculate flue gas NOx emissions in units of lbs/hr and tons/year. 5.1 The Extractive Sampling System — The M&C Dilution Probe The flue gas is diluted to reduce the dewpoint of the sample so that it will not condense in the sampling and analytical system, but remains wet. The M&C dilution probes dilute the flue gas in a unit external to the stack so that the dew point of the diluted gas will be less than the dew point of the lowest ambient temperature at the sampling location. This simplifies the gas transport system and eliminates the need for water removal systems. The M&C probe is constructed of stainless steel and incorporates a particulate filter to prevent particles from entering the sample system and critical orifice. The sample gas is pulled into the probe assembly using a booster ejector pump (eductor). Another ejector pump (dilution eductor) located in a connector cross, draws a sample slipstream from the bypass pump flow utilizing a glass critical orifice also located in the cross. Filters are located in the cross and in the dilution air line to prevent particles from plugging the orifice or eductor (Figure 5). Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems Revision 0 — February 2006 System Description Pane 7 of 22 Sample in , (Prole) 4 --- Ejector pump alr out J ' rtat1a' 1 Cagpurge gas in r Fillers Fite ICJ Dnon Ejector Pump air in Enle gement Figure 5 The M&C dilution probe. 1 To probe vacuum gauge Ejector pump (edudor) enlargement Pre.heater 1, 1 1 Dilution Diluted gas In sample out The dilution assembly and probe filter are shown in the photograph of Figure 6. Figure 6 M&C dilution probe assembly The ejector pump operates at flow rates of approximately 3980 ml/min, using air cleaned and dried by the air clean-up system. The ejector pump air mixes with the flue drawn in through the orifice to dilute the sample gas. The dilution ratio is determined by calculating the following: Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems System Description Revision 0 — February 2006 Page 8 of 22 O1 + O2 Dilution ratio - Eq. 2 O2 where: O1 = Dilution air flow rate (I/min) O2 = Sample gas flow rate (I/min) A dilution ratio of approximately 100:1 is used in the Windsor system. Calibration gas is injected through a gas line that is built into the probe assembly. Zero or calibration gas purges flue gas out from the inside of the probe assembly. The sample umbilical lines is a multi -line bundle of tubing, wires, and insulation used to transport the calibration gases and dilution air to the probe and transport the diluted sample gas to the sample controller. A low temperature self-regulating heater in the line is used to guard against freezing. The umbilical consists of the following tubes: 1. two 3/8" Teflon tubes for transporting diluted sample to the analyzers, one provided as spare 2. two 1/4" Teflon tubes for transporting calibration gas and purge air to the probe, and one as a spare, 3. one 1/4" Teflon tube for monitoring the vacuum at the orifice. 4. one 1/4" Teflon tube for supplying the air for the bypass ejector pump (Bypass Eductor) The ESC Model 1401 Probe Controllers, installed in the instrument rack are used to both monitor and control the flow of gases through the dilution system. The control panel incorporates gauges for monitoring the dilution air pressure and the probe vacuum. These are checked daily in the Standard Operating Procedures described in SOP:3. The following nominal readings are expected from the gauges and rotometers on the controller: Dilution Air Pressure: 42 psi ± 2 psi Probe Vacuum: - 20 in. Hg or less Cal. Flow (when on): 2.0 L/min Cal/Purge Flow (when on): 3.5 L/min The two rotometers monitor the calibration gas flow and the purge air flow. The calibration and purge flow rotometers indicate flow only during the air/purge or manual calibration check cycles. The zero air and span gas flows are set and monitored by the calibration flow rotometer. Three regulators are mounted on the panel, one to adjust zero air pressure, and one to adjust the dilution ratio. The B Stack dilution probe controller installed on the instrument rack is shown in the photograph of Figure 7. Figure 7 B Stack ESC Model 1401 control panel. Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems System Description Revision 0 — February 2006 Page 9 of 22 A generalized schematic of the control, sampling, and analytical subsystems is shown in Figure 8. ■ COs L_! 0 Analyzer E9 -0o Dilution Probe 4 _ Fp A _ Cal. Flow CauPurge 1 Cal. Gas Flow Oll. Air Pressure Probe Vacuum Dilution Air Regulator Probe Controller Dilution Air NOs Analyzer OM= U1=1=1=1 Excess _ — — Samplc Educt or Flow Noz Vent CO, Vent 1 Dry Air Backptxgo Regulator I Dry Air Figure 8 Generalized Windsor Plant CEM System Schematic Bypass Air The control subsystem is seen here as central to the operation of the monitoring system. The cleaned, dilution air is sent to the probe, which in dilutes the sample and transports it to the NOx and CO2 analyzers. The function of the pressure and vacuum gauges and the control system rotometers and regulators are shown in the figure. 5.1 The Extractive Sampling System — The Air Clean -Up System An ESC air clean-up system is used to provide dilution air for both the A and B Stack dilution extractive systems. Air is supplied to the dilution system to dilute the sample gas that is directed to the NOx and CO2 analyzers. In addition the purified air serves as the air supply for the zero calibration cycles of the NO x and CO2 analyzers, and as an air supply for the ozone generator of the NO x analyzer. Plant air is provided separately through the 1401 Dilution Controller to periodically purge the probes of particulate matter. A photograph of the air clean-up system is shown in Figure 9. 11 ry Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems Revision 0 - February 2006 System Description Page 10 of 22 Figure 9. The clean air supply systems. Two identical clean air supply systems are mounted on the wall behind the CEM system instrument rack. The systems run in parallel to provide dilution air for both the A and B CEM Systems. Figure 10 shows a schematic of one of the subsystems: Particulate Filler a Desiccant Towers (WO, COI/elnrwal) Air In >IQ Psi >ao psi Ltlean Air to GEM System Contester O O O O O OI 0 0 O O 0 O Pursues Scrobbere jSO, IVO. removal) Figure 10 Schematic of one clean air supply system. In Figure 9 are shown the desiccant towers, Puregas scrubbers, particulate filters and coalescers. Air entering the air dryers is first scrubbed to remove any NO x and is filtered further for particulate matter. The material PurafilTM (potassium permanganate on an alumina substrate) is used to remove SO2 and NO x. The Puregas compressed air, air dryer is used to remove moisture and CO2 from the instrument air that supplies the dilution system. The drying columns use a combination of coalescing filtration and regenerative pressure swing adsorption to provide clean air to the system. The purifiers contain two columns each of desiccant material. While one column is drying the air, the other is regenerating. The columns reverse functions approximately every two minutes. Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems System Description Revision 0 — February 2006 Page 11 of 22 5.2 Teledyne Monitor Labs /API Model 200EM Chemiluminescence Nitrogen Oxides Analyzers API Model 200EM analyzers are used in the A and B stack CEM systems, to analyze nitrogen oxide concentrations by the technique of chemiluminescence. Chemiluminescence is the emission of light for an electronically excited molecule formed in a chemical reaction. In chemiluminescence NO,< analyzers, nitric oxide (NO) in the sample reacts with ozone (O3) generated by the analyzer. The two react to form an excited nitrogen dioxide molecule (NO2*). When the excited molecule, de -excites to its ground state (unexcited state), it emits energy as light in the spectral region from about 500 to 3000 nm. The reaction is as follows: NO + O3 > NO2* NO2* + O2 -> NO2 + hu(light) The chemiluminescent radiation is monitored over a narrow region of the total emission. A filter is used to select light in the region from about 600 to 900 nm. The amount of light produced is proportional to the number of NO molecules present in the sample. The photomultiplier tube (PMT) is cooled to -2° F to provide stability. Figure 11a and b illustrate the operational characteristics typical of the instrument. Step 4'. NO + NO Reaction chamber Bendpass filar O;sowce PhotomullipIMml nlbe �. Figure 11a Operational characteristics of a chemiluminescence analyzer. NO Measurement mode. Step 2: NO + NO (Converted from NO; 03 generator NO +O, Reaction chamber e Bondpass h filter Phal°nvllipherI tube C. 0- source NO+ NO; Sample in Figure 1 1 b Operational characteristics of a chemiluminescence analyzer. NO, measurement mode, Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems System Description Revision 0 — February 2006 Page 12 of 22 Ozone is generated by the ultraviolet irradiation of oxygen in a quartz tube. The ozone is provided in excess to the reaction chamber to ensure complete reaction and the reaction takes place at reduced pressure to minimize quenching effects. Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) does not undergo the chemiluminescent reaction and, if must first be reduced to NO. A converter is used to catalytically reduce the NO2 to NO. NO2 heat NO + '1(2O2 catalyst In the API Model 200EM analyzers, molybdenum converters are operated at 325°C. The NO produced is reacted with the ozone and the chemiluminescence is measured to give a total NO + NO2(as NO) reading as NO,. A separate pump is used for the NO, analyzer. The pump is used in conjunction with a permeation drier to pull the sample through the analyzer and to provide a source of dry air for the analyzer's ozone generator. The instrument panel for the B CEM System is shown in Figure 12. 6 CENS NO • • S SAMPLE RANUEE59E.0 PPE NO 1279. (TST TST> CAL SETUP CMEMI_UMIwESCENCE N(SMALV24N- WOE TOPE • Figure 12 The Teledyne Monitor Labs/API Model 200EM NO„ Analyzer Control Panel 5.2 Teledyne Monitor Labs /API Model 360E Gas Filter Correlation Carbon Dioxide Analyzers API Model 200EM analyzers are used in the A and B stack CEM systems, to analyze carbon dioxide concentrations by the technique of infrared gas filter correlation spectroscopy. The gas filter correlation technique utilizes a rotating wheel that contains two cells, one having a 100% concentration of the gas being measured (in this case 100% CO2) and the other filled with nitrogen. The CO2 cell essentially acts as a reference point at 100% CO2 for the instrument. In the instrument infrared light shines alternately through the CO2 filled part of the cell and the nitrogen -filled part. The light then enters a sample cell that contains multiple mirrors to reflect the light back and forth across itself in order to increase the pathlength of the light beam inside the cell. A portion of the light will be absorbed b any CO2 molecules in the sample cell and the radiation then exits to be measured at the infrared detector. In the operation of the instrument, the filter wheel is rotating continuously so that the detector will see alternately, a signal from the combination of sample cell and the N2 filled cell + sample cell. Figure 13 illustrates the operation of the instrument. Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems Revision 0 - February 2006 System Description Page 13 of 22 Figure 13 Schematic of Gas Filter Correlation Analyzer Operating Principles First, consider the difference in signals between the CO2 and N2 sides of the wheel when the sample cell is flushed with zero gas. When light passes through the gas filter (the reference beam) it will be attenuated (Figure 14). wY No sample gas In light path ±pi Same gas in fight Path Gas Filter Cell Neutral Cell {e) ebssrygon wavelength neared out %T 1.1 .° t a t s fb1 all wavelengths transmitted (c) some tranmsgance as with NO reduced t,ansnrdnnce from no sample ens sample In sample cell Figure 14 Principles of gas filter correlation spectroscopy. Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems System Description Revision 0 — February 2006 Pape 14 of 22 The section of the wheel containing the CO2 removes most of the light at the wavelengths where CO2 absorbs in the infrared spectrum. The light exiting this section of the wheel is essentially scrubbed (or filtered) of light wavelengths that could be absorbed by CO2 in the sample cell (Figure 13a). Those wavelengths not absorbed by the CO2 in the gas filter cell are not removed and are passed through the sample cell and on to the detector. The net result is a reduction in light energy reaching the detector, due to the absorption of light energy in the gas filter cell. In contrast, when the radiation from the infrared source passes through the N2 -side of the wheel, the intensity is not reduced. Nitrogen does not absorb infrared energy, so the amount of light exiting this section of the wheel as it turns into the light beam is the same as the amount entering (Figure 13b). Next, consider the condition where sample gas containing CO2 is introduced into the sample cell. The infrared beam will again be alternating through the N2 and CO2 sides of the filter wheel and then will pass through the sample cell on to the detector. CO2 molecules are now present in the sample cell and they will absorb light energy at the CO2 absorption wavelengths. Because the gas filter was chosen to absorb energy at these same wavelengths, the absorption is already complete in the gas filter cell beam, and the detector will see the same signal as it did when the sample cell contained zero gas (Figure 13c). The beam passing through the N2 -side, however, will carry less energy because light is absorbed by the CO2 in the sample gas (Figure 13d). The difference in energy between the two beams is monitored and can be related to the CO2 concentration in the sample. Other gases having spectral patterns in the same regions of CO2 will not affect the measurement if they do not "correlate" with the CO2 spectral pattern. If, however, the peaks coincide with the CO2 spectra, a positive interference will result. The interfering gas will reduce the light intensity when light passes through the N2, but not when passing through the gas filter. Conversely, if the interfering molecule's peaks fall between the troughs of the CO2 spectra, a negative interference will result. The energy of the light passing through both the gas filter cell and neutral cell is thus reduced. Because the energy through the gas filter is supposed to remain the same to use as a reference against the measurement beam (N2 side), the interference will be negative. In most cases, the interfering spectra will have some peaks that overlap and others that fall in the troughs of the CO2 spectra. Because of this, positive and negative correlations will cancel to minimize the effect of the interference. Interference is further minimized by using a band-pass filter to select a region of the spectrum where the CO2 absorption is most specific. Figure 15 shows the control panel of the B OEM CO2 monitor and the front panel of the APC Uninterruptible Power Supply. a urop COMIE1.'.110N CU, M,AL(ZYR NODL_>I I Figure 15 The Teledyne Monitor Labs/API Model 360E CO2 Analyzer and APC UPS Control Panels Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems System Description Revision 0 — February 2006 Page 15 of 22 5.4 Calculations for Volumetric Flow The volumetric flow rate of a combustion process can be determined by using either flow monitors or engineering calculations. Flow monitors are most typically used in coal-fired power plants regulated under the EPA 40 CFR 75 Acid Rain and NOx Budget programs, however, it was determined by EPA that engineering calculations can give equivalent and often superior flow data. This is particularly true when the flow monitoring data is used to determine long-term emission averages (such as tons NOx/month or tons NOx/year). For this reason, engineering calculations are used for the determination of the NOx mass emission rates at the Windsor plant. The most common engineering calculation used to determine volumetric flow utilize the F -factor techniques. These techniques are used for the determination of flow in gas and oil -fired sources in EPA's allowance trading programs (see 40 CFR 75 Appendix E) and have been the preferred method of monitoring flow for combustion sources in Canada (see Environment Canada CEM Guideline EPS 1/PG/7). F -factors and their various applications are described in detail in 40 CFR 60 Appendix A Test Method 19 and in Jahnke, Continuous Emission Monitoring, Appendix A. In the F -factor method, the volumetric flow can be calculated from the following equation: 100 OH °Combustion = Fc Eq. 3 %CO2Combustion where: °combustion = Volumetric gas flow from combustion of fuel Fc = the F factor specified for a given type of fuel being the ft3 CO2 emitted in the combustion process divided by the Btus of heat generated, expressed as ft3CO2 /mmBtu). The F factor is a constant (within ± 2-3% for a given fuel category, such as pipeline natural gas). HI = the heat input rate in Btu/hr, which is determined from the fuel gas feed rate and the fuel gross calorific value, i.e. HI = R x GCV or (ft3 Natural Gas/hr x GCV (Btu/ft3) = Btu/hr) Here, the Gross Calorific Value of Pipeline Natural Gas is fixed at a constant value = 1.025 Btu/ft3 %CO2Combustion = %CO2 produced from combustion of the natural gas A modified form of this equation can be used a glass -making facility to account for CO2 generated from the process. In the glass -making process, CO2 is generated from the combustion of natural gas used to heat the glass furnaces, and also from the materials used in the process. Most typically, calcium carbonate (CaCO3 [lime]) and sodium carbonate (Na2CO2 [soda ash]) are added to the batch process to reduce the melting point of the batch and to avoid crystallization of the glass. Cullet is also added to assist in the melting process and for recycling purposes. CO2 is generated from the reaction of the CaCO2 and Na2CO2 with the SiO2 (sand) in the batch, according to following reactions CaCO2 + SiO2 Na2CO2 + SiO2 -) CaSiO2 + CO2 Na2SiO2 + CO2 1 Typically 10% of the batch is CaCO2 (lime) and 15% is Na2CO2 (soda ash). Cullet introduces no CO2 into the flue gas. Therefore, the flue gas analyzer located in the stack will be monitoring CO2 generated from the combustion of natural gas and CO2 produced from the reactions in the batch between lime and soda ash with silica. To determine the flue gas volumetric flow rate from the measured CO2, the F -factor equation (Eq. 3 above) must accordingly be modified. Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems System Description Revision 0 — February 2006 Page 16 of 22 To account for the total flue gas flow, one can account for the lime and soda ash generated CO2 as follows: 100 HI Qtotal flow = Fc Eq. 4 QCO2Process Qtotal flow %CO2meas Solving for Qtotal flow one then has: Where: 100 QH Q total flow = Fc %CO2meas x100 QCO2Process %CO2meas x 100 Eq. 5 QProcess = Flue gas contribution from glass manufacturing process Fc is F factor for natural gas (1040 ft3 CO2/mmBtu) QH is the heat input rate (ft3 Natural Gas/hr x GCV (Btu/ft3) in Btu/hr) GCV is the Gross Calorific Value of Pipeline Natural Gas = 1.025 Btu/ft3 %CO2meas = %CO2 measured by the Teledyne -API analyzer and Qprocess is calculated as follows: 385.3 100 1 Q0o2Process = (PUIIRate X 2000) x (1 - Cullet/100) x (0.15)x x x Eq. 6 44 %CO2 60 Where: PullRate = pull rate of glass from furnace (tons/minute) 2000 = number of lbs/ton Cullet/100 = Fraction of Cutlet in batch 0.15 = lbs CO2 emitted per lb of glass pulled (Fusion Loss Factor) 385.3 = ft3 of gas at standard conditions of 20°C per lb mole of gas 44 = lbs of CO2/lb-mole %CO2 = percentage of carbon dioxide in the flue gas 60 = minutes/hr Here, the lbs of CO2 emitted from the reactions of lime and soda ash with the silica is estimated at a value of 0.15 lbs/ton of lb of glass pulled. This factor is estimated by the chemistry of the process, however, it can also be used as an empirical value in the equation to match the results of the calculation with EPA Method 2 Stack Test data. Alternatively, a bias adjustment factor (BAF) can be used to fine- tune the calculation to the Method 2 data (which are assumed by regulation to provide the true value for volumetric flow [although this assumption itself may not be true due to uncertainties associated with the stack test measurement]). Then from Equation 1, where the pollution mass rate, pmr = csQ, the lbs/hr of NOx are calculated: pmr = cNox x Q x 0.000001194 = Lbs NOx/hr Eq. 7 Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems System Description Revision 0 — February 2006 Paoe 17 of 22 where: pmr is the pollutant mass rate in lbs/hr cs is the NOx gas concentration, Q is the flue gas volumetric flow 0.000001194 is the conversion factor for ppm NOx to Ibs/ft3. The flow rate of the pipeline natural gas is determined using a Roots gas meter. The Windsor plant gas meter is shown in Figure 16. Figure 16 Roots meter for monitoring pipeline natural gas feed rate. The positive displacement Roots meter provides an accurate measure of the pipeline natural gas flow rate to the process, which is not density dependent as are orifice plate meters. The natural gas density can change as the composition of the gas provided by the supplier changes. 7.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS CORPORATION (ESC) 8832 DATA SYSTEM CONTROLLER The ESC 8832 data logger provides data collection and storage independent from the ESC polling computer and can serve to backup the DAS if the polling computer is taken off-line for maintenance or modification. It also serves to control the various automatic function of the monitoring systems, such as the daily calibration checks, probe purging, and alarming. The Model 8832 unit is based on a Motorola MPC860 Power QUICC CPU running at approximately 50 MHz, with 512 KB of EPROM for program boot functions. It has 4MB of FLASH for code storage,8MB of DRAM for operational data, 2MB of SRAM for data and configuration storage, and 8KB of EEPROM for system settings storage. It has a PCMCIA slot with an optional 2MB SRAM Recharge PC card for extended data storage, a real-time clock, a battery backup for the SRAM and real-time clock. A schematic or the 8832 front panel is shown in Figure 17: Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems System Description Revision 0 — February 2006 Paoe 18 of 22 r,Cr • AMIN CSEBCEta+a..w.a,eg.ma/ —p L — It_ow MOLE Figure 17 Schematic of ESC 8832 Datalogger front panel. A photograph of the front panel of the datalogger installed in the Windsor CEM system instrument rack is shown in Figure 18. Figure 18 ESC 8832 Datalogger and CEM System Status Lights Above and below the datalogger are installed system status lights to alert the Furnace Operator on the condition of the CEM systems. Lights for the A Furnace are located above the data logger. Lights for the B Furnace are located below the datalogger. When the green lights are on, the monitoring systems are viewed as "healthy," having no outstanding alarms. When a yellow light is on, the system is indicating a problem, but not one which would invalidate the data. A red light indicates a system fault where the data are not valid. A blue light indicates that the system is in calibration. During the calibration period, emissions data from the flue gas are not obtained. Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems System Description Revision 0 — February 2006 Page 19 of 22 7.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS CORPORATION (ESC) DATA ACQUISITION SYSTEM The ESC data acquisition system consists of a Dell Precision 370 Pentium 4 computer located in the CEM shelter and a remote terminal unit in the Furnace Control Room. The computer communicates with ESC 8832 Datalogger. Peripherals include a Dell 1905P Ultrasharp 19" LCD monitor, a Dell QuietKey keyboard, a Dell 2 -piece Speaker System, a US Robotics modem and an HP Laser Jet 1320 printer. Programs installed include the following: Microsoft Windows 2000 Professional SP4 Symantec PC Anywhere WINZIP v.9.0 E-DAS EMR for Windows The data acquisition system is shown in Figure 19. Figure 19 ESC CEM DAS The data acquisition system configuration is shown in the schematic of Figure 20. Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems System Description Revision 0 — February 2006 Page 20 of 22 WINDSOR fac7° a _ USR 88K EXTERNAL MODEM (CONK) O O O spun IIIP APC APC PRECISION 370 BACKUPS RS 800 ll ESC 0832 DATA LOGGER ETHERNET tit 11 Figure 20 ESC CEM DAS Configuration (TO HUB) LASERJET PRINTER The ESC DAS is based on a Windows NT platform. The polling computer is configured with facility information, control system information, channel information, parameters, codes, flags, alarms, etc. Kernel processes of the software include an Even Log Manager, a Database Update Manager, a data Polling Manager, an Alarm Manager, Alarm Logging, and a Task Scheduling Manager. The computer provides data reports, flags emissions exceedances, archives the emission data, and performs other data management functions a appropriated. Graphic displays include real-time trending, historical trending, calibration bar charts, calibration quality control charts, and custom displays. Reports that can be generated from the system include Daily Reports, Calibration Reports, Electronic Format Reports, Formula Verification Reports, and Configuration Reports. It maintains a detailed monitoring database that is used to generate electronic copies of data on diskette and to prepare reports in formats suitable for monthly data reports to the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment. Example DAS screens are shown in Figures 21 through 25. Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems System Description Revision 0 — February 2006 Page 21 of 22 t J Figure 21 Trend plot of real-time data j Iw Figure 23 Digital hourly emissions data 1011 In I ti l .ynl"a1! 1 1 " ms J `= P V ,ry' uenertna.nasa. ,;RL}'-l�i9Elj Figure 22 Alarm Screen Figure 24 Calibration data Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems System Description Revision 0 — February 2006 8.0 SPARE PARTS AND CONSUMABLES Page 22 of 22 Spare parts and consumables for the Windsor CEM system are available for maintenance of the CEM systems. The listings given here are provided for general reference. For the current status of CEM system parts and materials, refer to the computerized record. Access to the record is available through the stores computer. To obtain a current listing, see stores personnel. Spare parts for the dilution extractive systems and monitors are given in Table 3. Spare Parts No. Part Number Description No. ESC 770W — Zero Air Generator 1 612-5006 FILTER, REPLACEMENT 8 2 612-5007 FILTER, REPLACEMENT,COALESCING , 8 3 692-0001-S CHEMICAL, ACTIVATED CHARCOAL, TYPE KE, 2Kg 8 4 692-0011-S CHEMICAL, PURAFIL, 2 KG, MEDIA 2, ESC 8 5 612-5001 FILTER, WILKERSON, 3/8 FPT X 3/8 FPT 66284 1 6 612-5002 FILTER, COALESCING, 3/8 FPT, WILKERSON M28, 66260 * 1 7 616-0002 DRYER, DESICCANT WILKERSON X03-02-000 5Z611 * 1 8 622-9002 HEATER, 50W, 120V E1J39-E12 * 1 9 627-0603 VALVE, BR, HAND, BALL, 3/8" FPT, 6GD13 * 1 10 627-8001 REGULATOR, AIR, 0-300 PSI, WILKERSON R28, 6B210 1 11 627-8002 GAUGE, PRES., 0-160 PSI, 1/4 MPT CENTER 1X762 1 ESC Model 1401 - Dilution Controller 12 116-1416 COMPOUND DIGITAL GAUGE, 1 13 116-1420 RELAY, GEN. PURPOSE, 10AMPS, 1 14 116-1426 REGULATOR, 1 15 627-0704 VALVE, 2WAY SOLENOID, 120VAC, FLUID FLOW, 52K8DGB 1 16 627-0705 VALVE, 3WAY SOLENOID, 120VAC, FLUID FLOW, 53JJ8XGB 1 T -API 200EM/EH - NOx Analyzer 17 602-0279 PUMP REBUILD KIT, 607 4 18 602-0042 COOLER ASSY, 1 19 602-0116 ORIFICE, 7 MIL, 250 CC (844-126010), 1 20 602-0295 PMT, NOX, 1 21 602-0300 CARTRIDGE, MOLY CON, SUBASSY 1 22 602-0302 FAN, ASSY, REAR PANEL, E SERIES, 1 23 602-0304 HOLDER, 4 MIL ORIFICE 1 24 602-0305 HOLDER, 10 MIL ORIFICE 1 25 602-0311 VALVE, SOLENOID, SS, 12VDC, 1 26 602-0333 PUMP, THOMAS 607, 115V/60HZ, 1 Table 3 CEM System spare part list. Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Windsor, CO Air Emission Operation and Maintenance Plan Introduction: The Owens -Brockway Glass Container facility location in Windsor, CO is a synthetic minor source for the following pollutants: 1. Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) 2. Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) 3. Particulate Matter / Particulate Matter less than 10 microns (PM/PM10) Emissions of these and other pollutants are authorized by construction permit number 03WE1151 dated May 19, 2004 issued by the State of Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment. Detailed below is the O&M plan for emissions of SO2, NOx and PM/PM10 from glass melting furnace A and B as well as PM/PM10 emissions from the batch house. 1. Sulfur Dioxide (5O2): Sulfur Dioxide emissions are generate use of sodium sulfate as a -& mate agent and helps purif quality. Emission' scrubber furnace e and/or lim The scrubb ng re. nt is delivered to the plant and stored on -site in two large silos (one fo' - ach furnace). The reagent is removed by from the storage silo by an injection blower and discharged into the scrubber. The injection rate is controlled by a rotary screw. Proper operation of both the injection blower and rotary screw is continuously monitored by the Furnace Operator in the furnace control room. es by the a refining I to glass y individual dry reagent wit SO2 and removes it from the is include trona, sodium bicarbonate Emissions of SO2 from each furnace are continuously monitored by an emission rate monitor. Process control alarms are in place to notify furnace operators if SO2 emissions exceed targeted levels so corrective action can be taken. Operation and maintenance of the continuous emission rate monitor is covered by a QA/QC plan which includes daily calibration, quarterly accuracy audits and annual accuracy tests. Page 1 of 3 Version 1; April 27, 2006 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Windsor, CO Air Emission Operation and Maintenance Plan 2. Nitrogen Oxides: Nitrogen oxides (NOx) are a by-product from the combustion of natural gas. NOx is formed by the presence of nitrogen, oxygen and extremely high temperatures. At the Windsor plant, oxygen is used in place of air for furnace combustion in what is commonly called an "oxy-fuel" furnace. This results NOx emission that are substantially lower than emissions from traditional "air -fuel" furnaces. Emissions of NOx from each furnace are continuously monitored by an emission rate monitor. Process control alarms are in place to notify furnace operators if NOx emissions exceed targeted levels so corrective action can be taken. Operation and maintenance of the continuous emission rate monitor is covered by a QA/QC plan which includes daily calibration, quarterly accuracy audits and annual accuracy tests. 3. PM/PM10: A. Glass Melting Furnaces: Particulate matter (PM) and P emitted from each furn scrubbing processes. PM/PM 10 (ESPs). Th contains 3-f particulate p remove it fro as a by mi s r: control re o ed:dcat:. S ids fief. onin sse. t ru th- exh. ac st fi d late .rod ss t th Irons ass melti 10) are d SO2 dtrostatic precipitators eat ace and scrubber. Each ESP a charged collection plates. As the e charged plates attract the particulate and 0 h fur Periodically, e plate is "rapped" which allows collected particulate to fall off the plate and collect in the storage compartment below the ESP. Once in the storage compartment, the material is either re -used back into the glass melting process as a raw material or sent off site for proper disposal. Proper operation of each ESP, including field and rapper controls, are continuously monitored by the Furnace Operator in the furnace control room. During the PM/PM10 source test conducted in February 2006, two sets of tests were conducted on each ESP. The first test was conducted with all 3 fields operating in a normal operating mode. The second test was conducted with only 2 of the 3 fields operating in a normal operating mode. Page 2 of 3 Version 1; April 27, 2006 Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Windsor, CO Air Emission Operation and Maintenance Plan The purpose of the two different tests was to demonstrate compliance with the PM/PM10 emission limits under each operating scenario. This ensures that the facility is compliance with the construction permit limits during either mode of ESP operation. Accordingly, at least two of the three ESP fields on each ESP will be used to control PM/PM10 emissions from each furnace. If a situation occurs that results in only one or no operable fields or requires the ESP(s) to be taken off-line for service, the State CDPHE will be notified. B. Batch House: Most raw materials used in the glass making process are received and stored inside the batch house. The raw materials are stored in bins and transferred to the glass melting furnaces by conveyors. The batch house, including the . age bins and conveyors, are enclosed. In addition, emissions from mo :. ch h. use material handling equipment are controlled by dust collector Each dust collector used in the batch house ensure the pressure drop across the bags i The inspection is documented • • insp pressure drop is not within a manufacture sis to lions. if the Page 3 of 3 Version 1; April 27, 2006 01: HONEST, PURE, ICONIC GLASS VIA EMAIL and REGULAR MAIL January 3, 2014 Permit Engineer c/o Mr. Jayson Ellis Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South Denver, CO 80246-1530 303-692-3208 Jays°n.Ellis anstate.co.us Subject: Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. — Windsor, CO Minor Modification to Construction Permit No: 03WE1151 Owens-Illinois (OI) would like to submit the follow information to incorporate the construction permit number 12WE1354 associated with an internal combustion engine issued on November 16, 2012 to our existing construction permit issued for the entire facility issued on May 19, 2004 (Construction Permit No. 03WE1151). If you need further assistance, please me at 419.554.4017. Sincerely, Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Andrew Stewart, MBA, CHMM Senior Environmental Administrative Engineer Page 1 01: HONEST, PURE, ICONIC GLASS According to Colorado Air Quality Control Commission, Regulation numbeR 3, stationary source permitting and air pollutant emission notice requirements (5 CCR 1001-5), Applications for minor modifications should include the following (5 CCR 1001-5, Reg 3, Part C, Section X.D): 1. A description of the change, the emissions resulting from the change and any new applicable requirements that will occur if this change occurs. Addition of a warehouse generator - Caterpillar, Model C9, SN: G5A 04481 diesel fueled reciprocating engine for electrical generation. The design is rated at 480 BHP at sea level The engine is equipped with a turbo charger. 1.47 L/cyl. Manufacture date of 12/15/2010. Date of entry into Colorado is 2/1/2011. This engine is currently permitted for the facility under tnitia/Approval Construction Permit No. 12WE1354. The proposed modification is to incorporate the permitted warehouse generator into the existing Construction Permit No. 03WE1151. For emissions resulting from the warehouse generator, please refer to Condition 6 of Initial Approval Construction Permit No. 12WE1354. 2. The source's suggested draft permit. At the request of the source, the Division will provide the draft permit. Note that under this scenario, you are precluded from making the changes until we develop the draft permit. If you decide to submit a draft permit, it is sufficient to send us an annotated version of the relevant sections of your current permit. The draft permit should address all requirements applicable to the change, and the source will be required to comply with these proposed requirements upon implementing the change as described above. See Attachment #2 (Construction Permit 12WE1354) 3. Certification by the responsible official that the proposed modification meets the criteria for use of minor permit modification procedures and a request that such procedures be used. A letter from the Responsible Official requesting that the Division process this modification under the minor modification procedures (Reg 3, Part C, Section X) is sufficient to satisfy this requirement. Page 2 CI: HONEST, PURE, ICONIC GLASS See Attachment #3 (Certification Letter) 4. Completed forms supplied by the Division for the Division to use to notify the EPA and affected states. The Division has not developed forms at this time and will prepare a notification for the EPA and affected states. No action required 5. Data necessary to allow the Division to determine whether the source complies with: a) all applicable emission control regulations, b) applicable regulations for the control of hazardous air pollutants, c) requirements of the attainment program and d) any applicable ambient air quality standards and all applicable regulations. See Attachment #5 (C9300ekwStandbyTier3 and Emission Data for Diesel Fueled Generator C) 6. Copies of APENs. See Attachment #6 (APENs) Page 3 O1: HONEST, PURE, ICON IC GLASS Attachment #2 (Construction Permit) Page 4 sthe giv�st ►nna �ater:� or actin y`tier sufi ttin i i fatm, may .be nwn o e� to<< + t fi the Divisi to :of st r� ssl ra AQCC). Regulation o Department of PublicHealth and Environment Air Pollution Control Division in revocation o !fy compliance e ulation:No permit or enforcement action by the mailed. With, .the, permit or can be it was; issued:. it , .months such: ':plea ion erg: months. or: orreview shall .not JTIQ11 evio ieeD.. �n-Health and Environment r Pollution Control Davis on Reference: Regulation ate'only enforceable) exits= ssion. maw 'visto e rstatle rocess; st e or10- nceal; an emission which ,,. i �sth,d rd. `Such c nrealrrrent u #s Q achieve ampltance niith an r #he; co centration of pollutant in ria pollutan yeve `the miv� ea :sourcesx ifVQCor iraa+de available for o, he Divi&on a� p�_rovtded : r of ownershi sand r the su n°,upon ulat on a= ofthis rovjde ust e i tOl. woo emit are used on the t ppn Tequest of .the:. on or any ambient airy Mist t subrn tted with: >e.Prouision. On be found at t was received Emission data for Diesel Fuel Generator C Generator C (Annual limits1.32 & monthly limits 11) Rolling sum NA NA VN as zz VN VN VN VN NA NA NA NA 0 0 a z ' '' o 0 ' 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NOX Emissions . . . . . o 0 . .i 0 ' 0 0 ' 0 0 0 006 0 0 O d OO 0 00 . NOX emission factor 4 35 4.35 4351 4351 4.351 N N MM 4 P 4.35 435 N N mm 44 4.35 4 35 WNNMMMnMM m m 4444444444 m m m m m m m m 4 35 4.35 4 35 4.35 mm 44 m 4 35 4.35 n m 444 m m 4.35 4.35 m m 4444 in WI M m 4 35 4.35 m Q Generator C (Annual limits .02 & monthly limits .0016) E °' 0 tt NA NA z z z NA NA VN VN z z z z o 6 z 'OOOOOOOOOOOO ''' O o ' O O o O O O o O O OOOOOOOOOOOOOO O o O O O O O O O O O O O O O O PM10 Emissions � 0 O O O 0 O 0 O O O 0 O O O O 0 0.000005 0 000007 0.000002 I 0 000005 Co OO O O a O 0 0.000025 0.000037 PM10 emission factor 0 o 666666666666666060666666666666006666666666 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0.03 Generator C (Annual limits 02 & monthly limits .0016) E m 0 K zzzzz VN VN VN VN zz VN VN O o zo " " O o 0 OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO ' x 0 6660606060060666660 0 o000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PM Emissions . . N. o 0 0 P o O 0 N O 0 O 0.000005 1 0.000007 NN O OO OO o a d d O . O O 0 O 0.000025 0.000037 • PM emission factor 0 033 0 033 m m OOOOOOO 0666666 m m m m m m m m M m m 0.033 0 033 0.033 0 033 m m m m 0 0 6 0 m m 0 0 0_033 • 0.033 Com O O 0.033 0.033 m m 0 0 0 0 C] m m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.033 0.033 0 033 m m 0 0 06606666666666 m 0 m m 0 0 m m 0 m 0 m m 0 0 m m 0 0 m m 0 0 m 0 =O o O O O O O 6 O O O O O o O N O O O O O O 2.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0-OOOO N o 6 6 Month m } i� 7 j I2 i i l m l J.. m44 L t��I �OR�1 k �� rxrx h . B p$$FQFQ 6 Z W v� a aa May June O a N N O1: HONEST, PURE, ICONIC GLASS Attachment #3 (Certification Letter) Page 5 CI: HONEST, PURE, ICONIC GLASS VIA EMAIL and REGULAR MAIL January 3, 2014 Permit Engineer do Mr. Jayson Ellis Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South Denver, CO 80246-1530 303-692-3208 Jayson.Fliis(&state.co.us Subject: Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. — Windsor, CO Minor Modification to Construction Permit No: 03WE1151 As the Responsible Official for the above referenced facility, I certify that the proposed modification meets the criteria for a minor permit modification pursuant to Regulation 3, Part C, Section X, and I request that the Division process this modification under the minor modification procedures. Sincerely, Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Charles Payne Plant Manage Windsor, CO Page 1 01 HONEST, PURE, ICONIC GLASS Attachment #5 (C9300ekwStandbyTier3 and Emission data for Diesel Fueled Generator C) Page 6 DIESEL GENERATOR SET cii Image shown may not reflect actual package. FEATURES STANDBY 300 ekW 375 kVA 60 Hz 1800 rpm 480 Volts Caterpillar is leading the power generation marketplace with Power Solutions engineered to deliver unmatched flexibility, expandability, reliability, and cost-effectiveness. FUEL/EMISSIONS STRATEGY • EPA Certified for Stationary Emergency Application (EPA Tier 3 emissions levels) DESIGN CRITERIA • The generator set accepts 100% rated load in one step per NFPA 110 and meets ISO 8528-5 transient response. UL 2200 • UL 2200 listed packages available. Certain restrictions may apply. Consult with your Cat® Dealer. FULL RANGE OF ATTACHMENTS • Wide range of bolt -on system expansion attachments, factory designed and tested • Flexible packaging options for easy and cost effective installation SINGLE -SOURCE SUPPLIER • Fully prototype tested with certified torsional vibration analysis available WORLDWIDE PRODUCT SUPPORT • Cat dealers provide extensive post sale support including maintenance and repair agreements • Cat dealers have over 1,800 dealer branch stores operating in 200 countries • The Cat® S•O•SSM program cost effectively detects internal engine component condition, even the presence of unwanted fluids and combustion by-products CAT® C9 ATAAC DIESEL ENGINE • Utilizes ACERTTM Technology • Reliable, rugged, durable design • Field -proven in thousands of applications worldwide • Four-stroke diesel engine combines consistent performance and excellent fuel economy with minimum weight • ADEMTMA4 electronic engine control CAT GENERATOR • Matched to the performance and output characteristics of Cat engines • Load adjustment module provides engine relief upon load impact and improves load acceptance and recovery time • UL 1446 Recognized Class H insulation CAT EMCP 4 CONTROL PANELS • Simple user friendly interface and navigation • Scalable system to meet a wide range of customer needs • Integrated Control System and Communications Gateway STANDBY 300 ekW 375 kVA 60 Hz 1800 rpm 480 Volts FACTORY INSTALLED STANDARD & OPTIONAL EQUIPMENT `e. CAT® S stem Air Inlet Exhaust • Dry exhaust manifold • Exhaust flange outlet Generator Governor • ADEMTMA4 [ 1 Load share module Lube [ 1 Oil temperature sensor [ 1 Manual sump pump Starting/Charging Standard • Light Duty Air filter • Service indicator • Class H insulation • Class H temperature Rise • VR6 voltage regulator with 3 -phase sensing with load adjustment module • IP23 Protection • Power cable termination box (NEMA mech lug holes) • Lubricating oil and filter • Oil drain line with valves • Fumes disposal • Lube oil level indicator • Oil cooler • 24 volt starting motor • 24 volt, 45 amp charging alternator O • tional [] Single element air filter [] Dual element air filter [ 1 Heavy-duty dual element air filter with precleaner []Air inlet shut-off [ 1 Industrial [ 'Residential [ ] Critical Mufflers [ I Stainless steel exhaust flex fittings with split -cuff [] Manifold and turbocharger guards I ] Elbows and through -wall kits [ 1 Oversize generators [ ] Digital voltage regulator with kVAR/PF control [ ]Anti -condensation heaters [ 1 Coastal Insulation Protection (CIP) [ ] Permanent magnet excitation (PMG) I I Internal excited (IE) [ ] Reactive droop [ 1 Jacket water heater with shut off valves [ ] Block heater [ I Ether starting aid [ 1 Battery disconnect switch [ 1 Battery chargers (5 or 10 amp) [ 1 Oversize batteries [] Batteries with rack and cables 2 June 13 2011 11:22 AM STANDBY 300 ekW 375 kVA 60 Hz 1800 rpm 480 Volts RATING DEFINITIONS AND CONDITIONS Meets or Exceeds International Specifications: AS1359, CSA, IEC60034-1, ISO3046, ISO8528, NEMA MG 1-22, NEMA MG 1-33, UL508A, 72/23/EEC, 98/37/EC, 2004/108/EC Standby - Output available with varying load for the duration of the interruption of the normal source power. Average power output is 70% of the standby power rating. Typical operation is 200 hours per year, with maximum expected usage of 500 hours per year. Standby power in accordance with ISO8528. Fuel stop power in accordance with ISO3046. Standby ambients shown indicate ambient temperature at 100% load which results in a coolant top tank temperature just below the shutdown temperature. CAr Ratings are based on SAE J1349 standard conditions. These ratings also apply at ISO3046 standard conditions. Fuel rates are based on fuel oil of 35° API [16° C (60° F)1 gravity having an LHV of 42 780 kJ/kg (18,390 Btu/lb) when used at 29° C (85° F) and weighing 838.9 g/liter (7.001 lbs/U.S. gal.). Additional ratings may be available for specific customer requirements, contact your Cat representative for details. For information regarding Low Sulfur fuel and Biodiesel capability, please consult your Cat dealer. 5 June 13 2011 11:23 AM STANDBY 300 ekW 375 kVA 60 Hz 1800 rpm 480 Volts DIMENSIONS CAT® Package Dimensions Width 1110.0 mm 43.7 in Weight 2307 kg 5,086 lb Performance No.: DM8168 Feature Code: C09DE03 Gen. Arr. Number: 2377184 Source: U.S. Sourced June 13 2011 17796866 NOTE: For reference only - do not use for installation design. Please contact your local dealer for exact weight and dimensions. (General Dimension Drawing #2778059). www.Cat-ElectricPower.com © 2011 Caterpillar All rights reserved. Materials and specifications are subject to change without notice. The International System of Units (SI) is used in this publication. CAT, CATERPILLAR, their respective logos, "Caterpillar Yellow," the "Power Edge" trade dress, as well as corporate and product identity used herein, are trademarks of Caterpillar and may not be used without permission. 6 STANDBY 300 ekW 375 kVA 60 Hz 1800 rpm 480 Volts TECHNICAL DATA CAT® Open Generator Set - - 1800 rpm/60 Hz/480 Volts DM8168 Tier 3 Coolant to aftercooler Coolant to aftercooler temp max Cooling System' Air flow restriction (system) Air flow (max @ rated speed for radiator arrangement) Engine Coolant capacity with radiator/exp. tank Engine coolant capacity Radiator coolant capacity Exhaust System Exhaust stack gas temperature Exhaust gas flow rate Exhaust flange size (internal diameter) Exhaust system backpressure (maximum allowable) Alternator' Motor starting capability @ 30% voltage dip Frame Temperature Rise 49°C 120°F 0.12 kPa 497 m3/min 36.0 L 22.0 L 14.0 L 499.5 ° C 69.7 m3/min 170 mm 5.9 kPa 931.1 ° F 2461.4 cfm 7 in 23.7 in. water 682 skVA LC5014J 150 ° C Emissions (Nominal)' NOx g/hp-hr CO g/hp-hr HC g/hp-hr PM g/hp-hr 4.12 g/hp-hr .25 g/hp-hr .06 g/hp-hr .033 g/hp-hr 0.48 in. water 17551 cfm 9.5 gal 5.8 gal 3.7 gal 270 ° F ' For ambient and altitude capabilities consult your Cat dealer. Air flow restriction system) is added to existing restriction from factory. 'Generator temperature rise is based on a 40° C (104° F) ambient per NEMA MG1-32. 'Emissions data measurement procedures are consistent with those described in EPA CFR 40 Part 89, Subpart D & E and ISO8178-1 for measuring HC, CO, PM, NOx. Data shown is based on steady state operating conditions of 77°F, 28.42 in HG and number 2 diesel fuel with 35° API and LHV of 18,390 btu/lb. The nominal emissions data shown is subject to instrumentation, measurement, facility and engine to engine variations. Emissions data is based on 100% load and thus cannot be used to compare to EPA regulations which use values based on a weighted cycle. 4 June 13 2011 11:23 AM STANDBY 300 ekW 375 kVA 60 Hz 1800 rpm 480 Volts SPECIFICATIONS cam' CAT GENERATOR Frame size LC5014J Excitation Self Excitation Pitch 0.6667 Number of poles 4 Number of bearings Single bearing Number of Leads 012 Insulation UL 1446 Recognized Class H with tropicalization and antiabrasion - Consult your Caterpillar dealer for available voltages IP Rating Drip Proof IP23 Alignment Pilot Shaft Overspeed capability 125 Wave form Deviation (Line to Line) 2% Voltage regulator Three phase sensing Voltage regulation Less than +/- 1/2% (steady state) Telephone influence factor Less than 50 Harmonic Distortion Less than 5% CAT DIESEL ENGINE C9 ATAAC, 1-6, 4 -Stroke Water-cooled Diesel Bore 112.00 mm (4.41 in) Stroke 149.00 mm (5.87 in) Displacement 8.80 L (537.01 in') Compression Ratio 16.1:1 Aspiration Air -to -Air Aftercooled Fuel System Hydraulic electronic unit injection Governor Type Caterpillar ADEM control system CAT EMCP 4 SERIES CONTROLS EMCP 4 controls including: - Run / Auto / Stop Control - Speed and Voltage Adjust - Engine Cycle Crank - 24 -volt DC operation - Environmental sealed front face - Text alarm/event descriptions Digital indication for: -RPM - DC volts - Operating hours - Oil pressure (psi, kPa or bar) - Coolant temperature - Volts (L -L & L -N), frequency (Hz) - Amps (per phase & average) - ekW, kVA, kVAR, kW -hr, %kW, PF (4.2 only) Warning/shutdown with common LED indication of: - Low oil pressure - High coolant temperature - Overspeed - Emergency stop - Failure to start (overcrank) - Low coolant temperature - Low coolant level Programmable protective relaying functions: - Generator phase sequence - Over/Under voltage (27/59) - Over/Under Frequency (81 o/u) - Reverse Power (kW) (32) (4.2 only) - Reverse reactive power (kVAr) (32RV► - Overcurrent (50/51) Communications: - Four digital inputs (4.1) - Six digital inputs (4.2 only) - Four relay outputs (Form A) - Two relay outputs (Form C) - Two digital outputs - Customer data link (Modbus RTU) (4.2 only) - Accessory module data link (4.2 only) - Serial annunciator module data link (4.2 only) - Emergency stop pushbutton Compatible with the following: - Digital I/O module - Local Annunciator - Remote CAN annunciator - Remote serial annunciator 3 June 13 2011 11:23 AM Cl: HONEST, PURE, ICONIC GLASS Attachment #6 (APENs) Page 7 6) Internal Combustion En Co) N dy assigned a permit # & AIRS ID] [Provide Facility Equipment ID to identify how this equipment is referenced within your organiza L O a) C a?_ Warehouse Facility Equipment ID: uested Action (check applicable request boxes) Section 02 — Re Section 01 — Administrative Information Request for NEW permit or newly reported emission source Request PORTABLE source permit ® ❑ Source Name: a. O 4) 0 O d 0 O a s 4) Y 4) .C E d C. 00 aa 4- 0 U 4- 04.1 'R 3 4) rx O United states Change company name Change fuel or equipment 4- E fi 0 Transfer of ownership Change permit limit N N 7 al faQ 00 4j .0 x 0 Request APEN update only (check the box below that applies) an co C) O U 0.. N o 0 C) CO 7 ii C - COo o 0 0 w C all O g C y s v 05 0 e a >, 3 L b d O v a Q E 6 v) 40 4) 0 Si ?I VI � d G 'n C C 0 4) 0 TA A y O ti+ O N V ++ ❑ El z O 567-336-7476 Phone Number: John Mason Attached Manufacturer's Guaranteed Emissions To' a .o d4 z Section 03 - General Information NN For new or reconstructed sources, the projected startup date is: For existing sources, operation began on: In N a) i r b CO a O r N N L L 4) 0 U e 00 8 d m an 0 i m N N U e H 0 a `o_ 5 a. EA .o.a O y 2 m n CO H G r 3 C O O M _ H V w .r. L O � 5 = c 0 b A Ob., ..n in '*J R7 n a 0 6, .c r� y vi N +1' W N `n `Rt G Y `=!"r ' v° o u o O a c 4•." ..0 >o U > o0 3� Lv`� oa 04. e0>1 e ha y I" - C '' y.9 o E �- ` L L N 0 >'= o s a,_, US o U rA .-- o 0 o= ,-0 c a N =� p N . 0. Z` 0 z O O•� 04U N ox L> On 0. L 0. q !-. 0 M y 0 L _ E E- aXi::, �A w dv) 0 O 0O n ga he.state.co.us/a APEN forms: htto://www.cd /sslsspcpthtml he.state.co.us/a Date of any reconstruction/modification: a 4- N 0 C 0 o 0 a O C0. v 0 O c E b . N O 4) U O y .b O O w O 3 3 C to. C2 G_ a O 00 00 .0 .d v 4.) Te A "-, "0c GU Y 4.)Z 0 CI CI Q O Y z CO a0) E C 0 4 G s C/) c a -a - Z C 5 a0 - IdVN 7 0o O 6 OG) v 4) > O. N ine Information Section 04 — En i O 00 4d 0 z I 'C G. O O N Engine date of manufactur C0 W O. n4? CI U 0 ® ❑ Engine function: 0 4- N 00 N 0 00 V a CA PI 000 N Compression G] Engine Brake Specific Fuel Consumption @ 100% Load: ❑ ❑ El El „e c N C!) 8 b 4 co • O C O U C d 0 76 N O. O O 0 .I ' aC). 4) 4) O. GL m 44 ^J O 0 0 P. 0 0 0 0 VI en 0 0 O L 4. 0 0 0 . .0 y ) U ❑❑ a a N What is the maximum number of hours this engine is used for emergency back—up power? Internal Combustion En Co) O 1.1 Emission Source AIRS ID: C b0 0 ormation in the event of multiple stacks; provide datum & eithe Section 05 — Stack Information (Attach a separate sheet with r 4, 0 N Ito 0 0 a00 0 a3 0 U 00 N a 0 El N 00 N r, d 90 O " 2 O > CO A El G 0 ."C O w a 3 CJ O �O N: [i. 23 Direction of stack outlet (check one): Other: Length (inches) _ Section 06 — Fuel Consumption Information 6) T V a L 0 0. op a 2 2 .0 V y U 74 a 7 � 0 :d 4 cD (37 Y4 V 4 0 C4 500 hours/year L oD N N 6)4.3 V 4) .O o 7 rCy a 1. •0 U C) C C 0) Q -E C.1 Emissions Inventory Information & Emission Control Information Estimation Method or Emission Factor Source Please use the APCD Non -Criteria Reportable Air Pollutant Addendum form to report pollutants not listed above. Requested Permitted Emissions2 • Controlled (Tons/Year) Uncontrolled (Tons/Year Actual Calendar Year Emissions' Controlled (Tons/Year). to In I 1.3175 I .0325 N N• Uncontrolled Tons/Year) Emission Factor Units g/hp-hr rr�.n ttttt eA43 Al ttt A4 Uncontrolled Basis • .033 en c) 6 N et t N VN (uoilonpa j %) Xoualogjj lortuo7 z NA z I NA 1 VAt z VN VN 1 NA r actor 1./WAIII1Clilill1U11. a LWtIICU Control Device Description Primary Secondary z z NA z VN NA. z VN VN I z I NA z z NA I I NA z VN z z z VN VN I U r.missiuil Pollutant TSP 2 a 2 a 0 ° VOC o IFormaldehyde . -0 Q C Benzene C C E O C AO h 5 O O c G' O • A C O C U L G EU 0 . 2 Performance Data Page 5 of 8 RATED SPEED "Not to exceed data" TOTAL OXYGEN GEN ENGINE TOTAL TOTAL PART PWR PERCENT LOAD T POWER N NO2) S CO HC MATTER IN LB/HR LB1HR LB/HR EXHAUST EKW BHP LB/HR PERCENT 300 100 480 5.2700 .4900 .1300 .0700 9.1000 225 75 361 2.6500 .3700 .1400 .0600 11.1000 150 , 50 253 1.3500 .5300 .2000 .1400 12.6000 75 25 149 .7100 .4500 .1900 .0900 13.7000 30 10 82 .5300 .4200 .1700 .0600 15.0000 RATED SPEED "Nominal Data" TOTAL OXYGEN GEN PERCENT ENGINE NOT (AS TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL PART IN PWR LOAD POWER NO2) CO HC CO2 MATTER EXHAUST EKW BHP LB/HR LB/HR LB/HR LB/HR LB/HR PERCENT 300 100 480 4.3500 .2600 .0700 500.3 .0300 9.1000 225 75 361 2.1900 .2000 .0700 388.2 .0300 11.1000 150 50 253 1.1100 .2800 .1100 297.3 .0700 12.6000 75 25 149 .5900 .2400 .1000 188.9 .0500 13.7000 30 10 82 .4400 .2300 .0900 111.6 .0300 15.0000 t12, atcA hr = v s r►rt - 6 3 3 2 S" ,JoX LP.3SD http://trniweb.cat.com/tmI/servlet/TMIDirector?Action=bu ldtab&refkin.d=RNTMIRefNiun .... 07/14/2010 Performance Data Page 4 of 8 EMISSIONS DATA EPA TIER -3 2005 - -_- *.***.*.**..t. *t* *t**.***.*..**********.**.****. D4 Gaseous emissions data measurements are consistent with those described in 40 CFR, EU 97/68/EC, ECE Regulation No. 96 and ISO 8178 for measuring HC, CO, PM, and NOx. Gaseous emissions values are WEIGHTED CYCLE AVERAGES and are in compliance with the following non -road regulations: LOCALITY AGENCY/LEVEL MAX LIMITS - g/kW-hr U. S.(incl Calif) EPA/TIER-3 CO:3.5 NOx + HC:4.0 PM:0.2 Europe EU/Stage-II CO:3.5 HC:1.0 NOx:6.0 PM:0.2 REFERENCE EXHAUST STACK DIAMETER WET EXHAUST MASS WET EXHAUST FLOW (930.20 F STACK TEMP ) WET EXHAUST FLOW RATE (32 DEG F AND 29.98 IN HG ) DRY EXHAUST FLOW RATE (32 DEG F AND 29.98 IN HG ) FUEL FLOW RATE 4,157.9 LB/HR 2,461.79 CFM 865.00 STD CFM 792.46 STD CFM 23 GAL/HR httg://trniweb.cat.corn/tri/servlet/TMIDi rector?Action=buiidtab&refkind=RNTMIRefNum&... 07/14,001 0 8/27/2015 State.co.us Executive Branch Mail - Operating Permit 06OPWE289 STATE OF COLO RADO Walker - CDPHE, Danielle <danielle.b.walker@state.co.us> .,perating Permit 06OPWE289 Dennis Buenger <Dennis.Buenger@o-i.com> Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 7:59 AM To: "Walker - CDPHE, Danielle" <danielle.b.walker@state.co.us> Danielle — Let me try to answer your questions: Point 018 — cooling towers The 2,500 gallons per minute value is the maximum water circulation rate for the two cooling towers. We do not use chromium -based water treatment chemicals. The cooling towers do have drift eliminators. Points 011 and 012 — diesel generators Personnel at the plant have confirmed the following information for each engine: Date of manufacture: 2005 Displacement: 27 liters Engine max fuel design rate = 5.58 MMBTU/hr Maximum annual consumption of fuel = 20,350 gallons Max design horsepower = 823 HP Emissions for Points 011 and 012 The emission factors previously submitted were provided by the manufacturer. We are currently attempting to locate that information. The attached table shows emissions calculated with these emission factors as well as the AP -42 emission factors. , Mould Shop Emissions hops://m ai I.google.com/m ail/ca/u/0/?ui=2&ik=c3660fab6c&view=pt&cat=Owens-Brockway&search=cat&msg=14f4b6818bef43c0&sim 1= 14f4b6818bef43c0 1/3 8/27/2015 State.co.us Executive Branch Mail - Operating Permit 06OPWE289 The attached spreadsheet shows calculated PM emissions for the mould shop. These are potential emissions (controlled and uncontrolled) based on 8760 hour/yr. Actual emissions are based on less than 8760 hours per year. The actual number of hours is hard to determine so we will continue to use 8760 hours. In order for "uncontrolled actual emissions" of PM to be less than 2 tpy, we would need to restrict the hours of operation significantly. Therefore, we are not able to consider the mould shop operation as insignificant. Point 019 and Point 020 dust collectors The correct number of dust collectors is 3 for Point 019 and 33 for. Point 020. Still working on emission Point 025 Sincerely, Dennis J. Buenger (567) 336-7519 From: Walker - CDPHE, Danielle [mailto:danielle.b.walker@state.co.us] Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 3:47 PM To: Dennis Buenger Subject: Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Good Afternoon Dennis, I wanted to check in and see the what is the status on the Title V questions I had sent over? I also had three questions regarding Point 018, the two cooling towers. 1. Is 2,500 gallons per minute the maximum water circulation rate for the towers? 2. Does your facility use chromium -based water treatment chemicals to operate the cooling towers? 3. Do the towers have drift eliminators? https://mail.google.com/mail/ca/u/0/?ui=2&ik=c3660fab6c&view=pt&cat=Owens-Brockway&search=cat&msg=14f4b6818bef43c0&siml=14f4b6818bef43c0 2/3 ro L a) a) L O U u a) 0 U N O ++ -O U O O o ao U c in Ln f° o o N ro _C £ > ro W qp 0 O L al + co N 6_ p 73 c 3 O C 0 u p C C C i O co O o t7, N -0 C N •— c N 0 3 a 0.51 lbs/hr (0.01 gr/scf)(6000 scf/min)(60 min/hr)(1 lb/7000 grains) = Potential (uncontrolled) based on assumption of 80% control efficiency for dust collector s 0 N (controlled emisisons lbs/hr)/(1-.8) = Annual emissions based on 8760 hours/year a N N.1 ' -I r-1 controlled: 0.51*(8760/2000) = uncontrolled: 2.57*(8760/20) = O co co O O U O v, a) C O U ro ›- co ci u O i m C aJ 0 Emission Calculations for Diesel Generators - AP -42 Table 3.4-1 a L M N 00 LL w N II 3 co co +' r-1 O a O 0 0 0 0 %-I N O 0000 000 N OO1 LC) cri Cr N N 00 N N M cr N I'Z N i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ▪ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t ca. c» cn rr1 m m m M NNNNNNN • CO 00 00 CO 00 CO CO s- 4- ‘11 s L U1 �-I O O I� N O1 d' i11 u1 O O O N O l!1 O O 00 0 0 0 O O O O P O O ri 0 • a2N O U N 00000 NZ a O 0O O O N N C71 m N Ni 4 00 00 4 r -I U1 • O1 00 Ui N co U ) C C N C N co U) Q1 C O U L Q • O m — Ur • 0 00 T + ro � u Y u u cu O �J co C II • O C C �n Y O E D C (O 7 O u5 -cc 0 0 0 0 0 --.-Oc)OOOO Ln Ln Ui Ui m re) m ru MK) • 0 0 0 0 0 ONNNNNN O r O O O O O O 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 O Ci C) O 0 0 Q N N N N N N m m m m mru 0 00 00 00 00 - 00 00 'Cr Cr) CO (0 LO rn CA -i O LO O O 00 co; Ci O O 2 E O 0 0 0 a a N Z> U 7.25.2016 Response to: Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. Draft Operating Permit Number 06OPWE289 Owens -Brockway comments on Draft Permit Cover Page: Remove "Owens-Illinois" and keep "Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc." Removed Title Page: Replace "Owens-Illinois" with "Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc." Replaced The correct address for Issued To and Plant Site Location is: Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. 11133 Eastman Park Dr. Windsor, CO 80550 The Facility Contact Person is: Gail Thompson Environmental, Health and Safety Manager (970) 674-3825 Changed address and facility contact person. Page 1, Section 1.1 Replace the facility address with the correct one above. Replaced Page 6, 1.1.2 Carbon Monoxide (CO); and Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC), and Particulate Matter (PM, PM10, PM2.5), emissions shall be determined for each individual furnace using the emission factors in the table above and the monthly glass production as required in Condition 1.2 in the equation below. Particulate Matter (PM, PM10, PM2.5) emissions shall be determined for each individual furnace using the emission factors from the latest stack test (Method 5 and 202) and the monthly glass production as required in Condition 1.2 in the equation below. Condition changed 4 see Permit, Section II, Condition 1.1.2 and 1.6 — Major changes are in the Stack Testing Condition Page 6, Section 1.1.2 — Remove '&' from the left side of the equation. Add note that EF = emission factor. Removed and Put Emission Factor directly in to equation. Page 6, Section 1.1.3 In the beginning of the second line, change 'missions' to 'emissions'. Changed Page 6, Section 1.2 The equation, as written gives a result in 'tons/day' and not 'tons/month' as indicated. Added Days in Month to equation so the result is in tons/month Page 7, Section 1.3 This section is redundant to Section 1.2 and should be deleted. Since the number of bottles produced is a variable in the equation to calculate the glass production (pull rate) this recordkeeping requirement will need to stay in the Permit. I did change the record keeping from hourly and daily recording to daily and monthly recording. Page 7, Section 1.7: Regulation 1, Sec. III.C.1.c provides that "if two or more process units are connected to the same opening, the maximum allowable emission rate shall be computed by summing the allowable emissions for the units being operated." Each furnace, Furnace A and Furnace B (Points 001 and 002, respectively) is a process unit. The two furnaces are not connected to the same opening; the furnaces are exhausted through separate pollution control equipment and separate stacks. Therefore, the maximum allowable emission rate should be computed separately for each furnace, based on the process weight rate (glass produced) for each furnace which is 430 tons per day, or 17.92 tons of glass produced per hour. Regulation 1, Sec. III.C.1.a states that the allowable emission rate for process equipment having a process weight rate of 30 tons/hr or less is determined using the following equation: E = 3.59(P)o.62 Using a Process Weight Rate (P) for each furnace of 17.92 tons/hr, the Allowable Particulate Emissions in lb/hr (E) is 21.49 lbs/hr per furnace. Therefore, the total allowable particulate emission rate for the two furnaces shown in on the table on Page 5 should be 42.98 lbs/hr, not 30.69 lbs/hr. Owens suggests the following language for 1.7.1.1: 1.7.1.1 For process equipment of process weight rates of less than 30 tons per hour, the allowable emission rate shall be monitored by use of the equation: E = 3.59(P)o.62 Where: P = The Process Weight Rate for each furnace in tons/hr = 17.92 tons/hr E = The Allowable Particulate Emissions for each furnace in lbs/hr = 21.49 lbs/hr In absence of credible evidence to the contrary, compliance with the Particulate Matter Emission limitation shall be monitored by maintaining a record of a calculation demonstrating compliance with the limitation using the combination of the emission rates from the most recent PM stack test as required in Condition 1.6. The record of calculation shall be updated each time a new stack test is conducted with the new PM emission rate. A copy of the calculation shall be maintained and made available for Division review upon request. I Changed to 21.49 lbs per hour for each furnace Page 10, Section 1.11 This point is Points 001 and 002 are subject to the requirements in 40 CFR Part 60 Subpart A "General Provisions", as adopted by reference in Colorado Regulation No. 6, Part A, Subpart A. These requirements include, but are not limited to the following: Changed Page 11, Section 1.13.2.1 Remove "in" at the end of the first line. Removed Page 12, Section 1.13.3.1 a. The magnitude of excess emissions computed in accordance with 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart A, §60.13(h), ap. any conversion factor(s) used, and the date and time of commencement and completion of each time period of excess emissions and the process operating time during the reporting period (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart A, §60.7(c)(1)). Changed Page 21, Section 5 The draft permit identifies the Hot End Surface Treatment Units by manufacturer trade name Arekma (correctly spelled Arkema). The trade name is not critical for these units and should be removed. Removed Page 22, Section 6.1 — The result of the equation will be in tons/month, rather than lbs/month as shown. Changed to tons per month Page 35, Section 9.2 The quantity of water circulated in the cooling towers shall not exceed the limitation specified in the table above (Colorado Construction Permit 03WE1151, as provided for under the provisions of Section I, Condition 1.3). The quantity of water circulated for each cooling tower shall be determined monthly by multiplying the hours of operation required by Condition 9.4 of each cooling tower by The cooling towers meet the permitted water circulation rate limitation by design. The combined maximum design rate of each cooling tower is 2500 gpm (Systems Cooling Tower — 2,000 gpm, Furnaces Cooling Tower — 500 gpm). Once calculated the water circulated for each cooling tower shall be added together to determine the combined water circulation rate for emission calculations. Monthly quantities of water circulated shall be used in a running total for each compliance period and be made available to Division review upon request. A twelve month rolling total of water circulated shall be used to monitor compliance with the annual emission limitations identified in Condition 9.1. Each month, a new twelve month total shall be calculated using the previous month's data. Comment: The cooling towers meet the permitted water circulation rate limitation by design. Even if both cooling towers are operated at the maximum design rate 24 hours per day, 7 days per week, 365 days per year, the water circulation rate limitation of 1,314 MM gallons per year will not be exceeded. Note that below (Page 11 of 11 of this Document) it is stated that "Emissions from the cooling towers will be based on the actual water usage, which is measured with a water meter."If the facility uses a water meter for emission calculations, they will need to use the water meter to demonstrate compliance with the water circulation rate not the design limitation. See updated language in Operating Permit. Section 9.4 9.1 The hours of operation for each cooling tower shall be monitored and recorded monthly. Hours of operation- shall be used t$determine the monthly quantity of water circulated through the unit required by Condition 9.2. Records of the hours of operation shall be made available for Division review upon request. Removed Page 37 — Section 10.2 "10.2 The hours of operation for each dust collector shall be monitored and recorded monthly. The design flow rate and the compliance emission factor shall be used to demonstrate compliance with the annual emission limitation, based on 8760 hours of operation/year. Hours of operation shall be used to determine compliance with the annual emission limitation required by Condition 10.1. Records of the hours of operation shall be made available for Division review upon request ". The emission limits for Point 019 and 020 are based on the design flow rate for the dust collectors and the compliance emission factor in Table 10 on page 36 of the permit. Since full time operation of the dust collectors can be accomplished within the permit limits, it is of no value to record the actual hours of operation. The allowable emissions for Points 019 and 020 combined is 6 tons per year. • Point 019 units have maximum emissions of 3.57 tons/yr which is less than the allowed 4.0 tons/yr. • Point 020 units have maximum emissions of 2.11 tons/yr which is slightly more than the allowed 2.0 tons/yr. • Combined, the two points have maximum emissions of 5.68 tons/yr which is less than the allowed 6.0 tons/yr. Removed hours of operation from emission equation and the hours of operation tracking requirement, assume 8760 hours per year. Please clarify what emission limitation Owens Brockway would like for Point 019 and Point 020. Page 39, Section 11.2 — According to Regulation No.1, Section III.D, the requirements related to fugitive dust emissions are to be addressed in a Particulate Emissions Control Plan. It is better to have the specific particulate control actions identified in a Control Plan, rather than detailed in the permit since the Control Plan can be updated as necessary. If the details of Particulate Control are in the permit, the facility will not be able to update them as necessary. The Particulate Emissions Control Plan will need to be included in the Operating Permit, Colorado Regulation No. 3, Part C, Section V.C.1 requires Title V permits to have "Emission limitations and standards, including those operational requirements and limitations that assure compliance with all applicable requirements at the time of permit issuance". Since Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section III.D control plan is an applicable requirement from the underlying Construction Permit 03WE1151 it will need to be included in the Operating Permit. Page 40, Section 11.2.1.5 The necessity of using control rings for unloading of railcars and trucks should be re- evaluated. By design, the discharge chutes of hopper rail cars and trucks extend nearly to the ground surface to minimize fugitive dust emissions when discharging dry bulk materials into recessed receiving bins. Further, all bulk material unloading is done within a structure that provides protection from wind to minimize fugitive dust emissions during the unloading process. The structure has two sidewalls and a roof, and although both ends are open, the rail cars and trucks block the open ends to reduce wind during unloading. During the discharge of dry bulk materials from trucks that have shorter discharge chutes, Owens uses containment rings to minimize fugitive dust emissions. Since Control Rings are still being used for trucks with shorter discharge chutes, I do not think that the requirement should be removed from the Control Plan, however, "as necessary" has been added to the end so the condition now reads: "Control rings shall be connected and used during rail car and truck unloading of sand and raw materials as necessary." Page 41, Section 12.1 — The equation gives a result in tons/year rather than lbs/month as shown. Changed to give result in tons per month Page 69 — Appendix A - Update directions to plant — plant is no longer on 64 and %. Updated Page 69 — Appendix A - Emission Unit 16 should include 'coating' and not 'coding'. Changed Page 70 — Appendix A, Third paragraph - Replace 'furl' with 'fuel'. Changed General comments on Draft Permit: 1. Method 9 Opacity Reading on Inside Sources Permit requirements for these emission units include Method 9 opacity reading, even though these units exhaust inside the building. It is not standard practice to attempt a Method 9 opacity reading on an inside source, and technically not possible. The Method 9 requirement should be removed from the permit for these emission units: 008 — four forming machines 015 — packing operations (carton printing, hot glue machines, cold end spray) 017 — mould shop dust collector 019, 020 — batch house operations 025 — automatic blank lubrication Instead of requiring annual Method 9 observations, require visible emission observations (Method 22) every six months of the emission points. If emissions are observed, the emission unit shall be inspected and maintenance shall be performed. Please see each point listed above (Conditions 4.2, 7.3, 8.3, 10.2, and 13.3) in Operating Permit to see language change. 2. Correlation between annual monitoring requirements for 20% and 30% Can one annual Method 9 observation satisfy both requirements? Plan to do one Method 9 to demonstrate compliance with the 20% opacity requirement and one Method 9 to demonstrate compliance with the 30% opacity requirement. 3. Clarification of Startup definition for 30% opacity Startup as a definite re -start (furnace after rebuild) vs. startup as part of normal operation (emergency generator maintenance run). Definition of Startup from the Colorado Common Provisions Regulation reads as: "Any setting in operation of an air pollutant source for any purpose." 4. Process Weight Particulate Standard on sources vented inside In the draft permit, the process weight particulate standard of Regulation No. 1 is wrongly applied to sources that exhaust inside the building. This particulate standard is specifically for sources that cause emissions of particulate to the atmosphere. In addition, emissions from these sources are not based on the process weight rate. This requirement should be removed from these emission points: 003 — two refiners (statement of presumed compliance) 006 — four Iehrs (statement of presumed compliance) 008 — four forming machines 015 — packing operations (carton printing, hot glue machines, cold end spray) 017 — mould shop dust collector 019, 020 — batch house operations 025 — automatic blank lubrication In the Colorado Common Provisions Regulation the definition of Atmosphere is defined as "The surrounding or outside air i.e. external to buildings. Emissions of air pollutants from a building or structure not specifically designed to control pollutant emissions from sources within such building or structure shall constitute an emission into the ambient air or atmosphere." Since the building that each of the emission point is exhausting into is not specifically designed to control pollutant emissions, it is considered that the emission of sources inside the building is considered emitting to the atmosphere. These conditions cannot be removed from the Operating Permit. Technical Review Document Page 1 of 50, Section 1.0, third line: Remove the word "the" between "Permit for" and "Owens" Removed Page 2 of 50 The facility address is now "11133 Eastman Park Dr., Windsor CO" Changed Page 3 of 50 — Table at top of page The second backup generator should be labeled 'B' Changed Pages 4 and 5: 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Dc, Standards of Performance for Small Industrial -Commercial - Institutional Steam Generating Units Subpart Dc applies to each steam generating unit for which construction, modification, or reconstruction is commenced after June 9, 1989 and has a maximum design heat input capacity of 29 megawatts (100 MMBtu per hour) or less, but greater than or equal to 2.9 megawatts (10 MMBtu per, hour). Points 003 consists of two refiners each rated at 5.29 MMBtu per hour and Point 006 consists of four annealing lehrs each rated at 8.0 MMBtu per hour, all units are less than 10 MMBtu per hour and are not subject to the provisions of Subpart Dc. 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart JJJJJJ, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers Area Sources Subpart JJJJJJ applies to industrial, commercial, or institutional boilers that are located at an area source of HAPs. Point 003 is a natural gas fired refiner and Point 006 is a natural gas fired annealing lehr. Subpart JJJJJJ does not apply to gas -fired boilers as per §63.11195(e). A gas -fired boiler burns gaseous fuels and natural gas is considered a gaseous fuel under Subpart JJJJJJ, therefore Point 003 and 006 are not subject to the provisions of Subpart JJJJJJ. Comment: Owens' refiners and lehrs are natural gas fired, but are not steam generating units or boilers. References to 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Dc and 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart JJJJJJ should be removed. They Division typically addresses any NSPS and MACT rules that could apply to the facility to avoid any future confusion of applicability. I have added at the end that all units are not steam generating units or boilers. Page 5: A. Points 001 and 002 — Two (2) O -I Custom Built Natural Gas Glass Melting Furnaces, Each Rated at 57.35 MMBtu/hr The furnaces at the facility are fed mixed raw materials consisting of sand, salt cake, limestone, soda ash, and cullet through the feeder where the raw materials float on top of the molten glass already in the furnace. These materials melt into a viscous fluid and move towards the front of the furnace where the molten glass flows through a throat that leads to the refiners. The furnaces are oxy-fueled. Oxy-fueled furnaces combust utilize oxygen with a purity of 90 percent or greater as the fuel oxidant instead of air. Changed Page 7: Condition 14: The glass furnaces are subject to the New Source Performance Standards requirements of Regulation No. 6, Part A, Subpart CC, Standards of Performance for Glass Manufacturing Plants. The revised final rule for Standards of Performance for Glass Manufacturing Plants was published in the federal register on October 17, 2000. The two glass melting furnaces at Owens - Brockway are subject to the 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart CC requirements. 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart CC covers each glass melting furnace that has commenced construction or modification after June 15, 1979. The two furnaces at this facility commenced construction in 2005. The furnaces at this facility are fired by gaseous fuel and produce container glass. Container glass is defined as "glass made of soda -lime recipe, clear or colored, which is pressed and/or blown into bottles, jars, ampoules, and other products listed in Standard Industrial Classification 3221." While the glass melting furnaces are a modified process, the furnaces operate with the use of add-on pollution controls. Therefore, tThe furnaces are subject to the standards of particulate matter under §60.292. They will not have to comply with §60.293, standards for particulate matter from glass melting furnace with modified processes. With modified processes is defined as a furnace that is "using any technique designed to minimize emissions without the use of add on pollution controls" and the furnaces at Owens Brockway ore not a modified process. The standards of particulate matter under §60.292 have a particulate matter emission rate limit of 0.1 gram of particulate per kg of glass produced (0.2 pounds of particulate per ton of glass produced). Changed all but kept the sentence "they will not have to comply with §60.296, standards for particulate matter from glass melting furnace with modified processes." Page 11: The furnaces are exempt from the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart SSSSSS, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Glass Manufacturing Area Sources. Subpart SSSSSS applies to glass manufacturing facilities that are an area source of Hazardous Air Pollutants. Subpart SSSSSS is applicable to glass manufacturing facilities that use one or more continuous furnaces to produce glass that contains compounds of one or more glass manufacturing metal HAPs as raw materials in a glass manufacturing batch formulation. Glass manufacturing metal HAPs are defined as " an oxide or other compound of any of the following metals included in the list of urban HAP for the Integrated Urban Air Toxics Strategy and for which Glass Manufacturing was listed as an area source category: arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr), lead (Pb), manganese (Mn), and nickel (Ni)." This facility does not use any of the glass manufacturing metal HAPs in their batch formulation, the furnaces are not subject to this subpart. If the facility were to use any glass manufacturing metal HAP as a raw material in the future, it would be subject to 40 CFR 63, Subpart SSSSSS. Changed Page 15 of 50 — Section C. 1, This section wrongly references (6) lehrs; there are actually 4 lehrs. Changed Page 15 of 50 — Section C. 1, Paragraph 2, last sentence Change 'Please not that' to Please note that' Changed Page 16 of 50, first line — Add the word 'gas' after natural Changed Page 16 of 50, second bullet — The draft permit does not require recording operating hours for the four annealing lehrs. The lehrs typically run close to 8760 hrs/yr, so we will assume 8760 hrs/yr. Since compliance is based on monthly fuel consumption and a 12 -month rolling total; Owens should not be required to monitor hourly fuel consumption Removed hours of operating reference Page 29 of 50, second bullet — Cooling Tower water usage will not exceed 1,314 MMgal per year because that flow is based on the maximum design of the two cooling towers. Emissions from the cooling towers will be based on the actual water usage, which is measured with a water meter. If the facility has a water meter and they are recording the monthly water circulation rate to calculate emissions, they need to use this to demonstrate compliance with the water circulation rate, not the design limitation. Also removed the discussion on the hours of operation requirement from the TRD because this condition has been removed from the Operating Permit. Page 33 of 50 — Section J. 1., 7th bullet — Emissions from the dust collectors will be determined using the design flow rate of each unit and the emission factor specified in the permit. It will not be necessary to record hours of operation for these dust collectors. Removed Page 42 of 50 — Self Certification of ABL. Also page 43, Item 4. The self -certification document for ABL has been submitted. Condition removed from OP and June 21, 2016 received date added to the TRD. Item 4 has been removed. Page 46 of 50 — Box at top of page. Replace 'furl' with 'fuel'. Changed GLASS i E August 8, 2016 Ms. Danielle Walker Title V Operating Permit Engineer Colorado Dept. of Health and the Environment 4300 Cherry Creek Dr. South Denver, Colorado 80246-1530 Subject: Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. ("Owens") Windsor, Colorado Second Response to Draft Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Ms. Danielle Walker - Dennis J. Buenger Owens -Brockway Glass Container Inc. One Michael Owens Way, Plaza 2 Perrysburg, Ohio 43551 On July 25th 2016 Owens received your response to our draft -permit comments (submitted June 14, 2016) regarding the proposed draft permit. Owens considers these additional comments also to be important for the permit review process. Please let me know if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, Dennis J. Bue`iger Environmental Affairs Technical Engineer (567) 336-7519 Cell (419) 450-6114 o-i.com glassislife.com Section II —Specific Permit Terms 1. General: Visible emission observations Pursuant to Colorado Regulation No. 1, Section II.A.1, Owens will use visible emission monitoring to determine if any air pollutant is emitted to the atmosphere in excess of twenty percent (20%) opacity. For those emission units that have the additional requirement to not exceed 30% opacity for specific events (such as startup, process modification or adjustment of control 'equipment) a provision should be included that if none of these specific events occur during the compliance period, it is not necessary to demonstrate that the opacity remained below 30%. Such a statement is included for Furnaces A and B. 2. General: Monitoring frequency Any monitoring frequency expressed as "annually" should be changed to require testing to be performed once during each calendar year. Any monitoring frequency expressed as "every six months" should be changed to require testing to be performed during two non-consecutive quarters during each calendar year. Any monitoring frequency expressed as "quarterly" should be changed to require testing to be performed once during each calendar quarter. Any monitoring frequency expressed as "monthly" should be changed to require testing to be performed once during each calendar month. 3. Page 5 Table With the exception of the limitation for "Particulate", the limitations listed in the Page 5 Table represent the total for the two glass melting furnaces combined, not a limitation for each furnace. CDPHE has revised the allowable particulate matter emission rate limitation to 21.49 lbs/hr for each of the two glass melting furnaces (see Condition 1.7) - a combined total of 42.98 lbs/hr for the two furnaces. To avoid any potential confusion, the limitation in the Page 5 Table for the parameter "Particulate" should be changed to read "42.98 lbs/hr", not "21.49 lbs/hr". In the alternative, the phrase "per furnace" should be added to the limitation for the parameter "Particulate" to clarify that the limit for each furnace is 21.49 lbs/hr. 4. Page 6, Condition 1.1.2 Change "... approved stack test as required in Condition 1.6 and the monthly glass production..." to "... approved stack test as required in Condition 1.6, the allowable particulate emission limit in Condition 1.7, and the monthly glass production ...". 5. Page 6, Condition 1.1.2; Page 7, Condition 1.6 Previously, Owens suggested EPA Methods 5 and 202 be specified for particulate matter testing. The draft permit has been changed but still does not specify any test methods for PM testing; Owens continues to suggest that Methods 5 and 202 be specified. 6. Page 8, Condition 1.7.1.1 The current language is "... process weight rates of 0 tonsper hour or less ..." and should read "... process weight rates of 30 tons per hour or less ...". 7. Page 42, Section 11.2 The Particulate Emissions Control Plan should be included in the Operating Permit by reference. COLORADO I Department of Public Health & Environment Dedicated to protecting and improving the health and environment of the people of Colorado August 30, 2016 Dennis J. Buenger Owens -Brockway Glass Container, Inc. 11133 Eastman Park Drive Windsor, CO 80550 RE: Response to Owens -Brockway August 8, 2016 Second Response to Draft Operating Permit 06OPWE289 Dear Mr. Buenger: The comments you provided on the draft revised Operating Permit 06OPWE289 and Technical Review Document for your facility were received via e-mail on August 8, 2016. The Division has reviewed and addressed your comments as follows: Comment 1: General, Visible emission observations Response 1: Thank you for providing this information. The language "A visible emission observation is not required for any six (6) month period where no specific activities identified in Condition 4.2.2 (7.3.2, 8.3.2, 10.2.2, 13.3.2) have occurred" to Conditions 4.4.2, 7.3.2, 8.3.2, 10.2.2, 13.3.2. Comment 2: General, Monitoring frequency Response 2: Thank you for providing this information. This language has not been changed so the language in this Operating Permit 06OPWE289 can be consistent with the current language the Division is using in other recently issued Operating Permits. Comment 3: Page 5, Table Response 3: Thank you for providing this information. The table in Condition 5 has been changed to read "21.49 lbs per hour per furnace" and the language "per furnace" has been added after 21.49 lbs/hour in Condition 1.7. Comment 4: Page 6, Condition 1.1.2 4300 Cherry Creek Drive S., Denver, CO 80246-1530 P 303-692-2000 www.colorado.gov/cdphe John W. Hickenlooper, Governor I Larry Wolk, MD, MSPH, Executive Director and Chief Medical Officer Response 4: Thank you for providing this comment, the Division has not included the language "the allowable particulate emission limit in Condition 1.7" to Condition 1.1.2 because the allowable particulate emission limitation in Condition 1.7 is not used in the equation in 1.1.2 to calculate the monthly particulate matter emissions. Comment 5: Page 6, Condition 1.1.2; Page 7, Condition 1.6 Response 5: The Division does not typically specify specific testing methods in the stack testing conditions. This allows for the source to have leniency in which testing method they want to use. By not specifying a specific testing method, the source will not be required to continue using the specific methods listed in the Operating Permit if a new method is established. Comment 6: Page 8, Condition 1.7.1.1 Response 6: Thank you for providing this information, Condition 1.7.1.1 has been revised to read "process weight rates of 30 tons per hour or less". Comment 7: Page 42, Section 11.2 Response 7: Thank you for providing this comment. The particulate emissions control plan will need to be completely included in the operating permit and not only by reference per Colorado Regulation No. 3, Part C, Section V.C.1 and V.C.5. The next step for this draft initial operating permit will be to put it out for a 30 -day Public Comment Period. After that, the proposed permit will go to EPA Region VIII for a 45 -day review period. You will receive separate letters containing information for the Public Comment Period and EPA 45 -day review period. We appreciate that you took the time to thoroughly review this draft. Please feel free to contact me at (303) 692-3197 or danielle.b.walker®state.co.us. Sincerely Danielle Walker Operating Permit Unit Stationary Sources Program Air Pollution Control Division Page 2 of 2 Hello