HomeMy WebLinkAbout20171694.tiffINVENTORY OF ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION
Applicant WW, LLC cio Ralph Walker Case Number LISR17-0016
Submitted or Prepared
Prior to At
Hearing Hearing
1
Letter
Mountain
to J. Williams
View
Water
Division of Water
Users Association
Resources
dated
February
from A. Goddard
7, 2017
2
SPO
W. Wycoff
Letter of objection
dated
April
3, 2017
3
SPO
R. Knels
Letter of objection dated March
12,
2017
4
SPO
J. Torgerson
Letter
of
objection
dated
March
12,
2017
5
SPO
S.
Morelli
Letter
of
objection
dated
March
13,
2017
'
6
SPO
R.
Morelli
Letter
of objection
dated
March
14,
2017
7
SPO
S. Amerin
Letter
of
objection
dated
march
26, 2017
8
Sign
Planting
Affidavit
and Photograph
dated
May 10,
2017
9
30
-day
Mineral
Notice
dated
May
0,
2017
10
Community
Meeting
postcard received
May
15,
2017
11
Applicants
Letter
to neighbors,
undated,
received
May 15,
2017
12
S.
Malloy,
Mineral
Estate
Owner,
Letter
of
Notice
received
May
25, 2017
13
SPO
J
Korbe,
Letter
of
objection
received
June
5, 2017
14
Staff
Memorandum
of
requested
modifications
to
Recommendation
15
Anadarko
Letter
dated
June 6, 2017
16
SPO
6,
2017
L. Torgerson
Letter of
Objection
dated
March
12,
2017
received
June
17
Applicant's
Presentation
Images
for
Planning
CommissionX
18
SPO
Neighborhood
W.
Wycoff
Photographic
images of the
residences in the
4
I hereby certify that the items identified herein were submitted to the Department of Planning Services at
or prior to the sched uleed/Planning Commissioners hearing.
Kim Ogre
Plan
February 7, 2017
Joanna Williams, P.E.
Water Resource Engineer
Division of Water Resources
State of Colorado
1313 Sherman Street, Room 818
Denver, CO 80203
RE: Water Weli Application for Lot B, Recorded Exemption No, 1469-33-4 RECX16-0076
Dear Nils, Williams,
I have never heard Mtn View Water Users Association referred to as a district, It is a group of people that
share a water system _ It was formed approximately 60 years ago to server the local residents. At that time 3
wells were drilled, bylaws were created, and 128 certificates were sold. Each certificate represented one
residential water tap to one property. Over the years some certificates have been sold or transferred when a
house was torn down, burned, or the user had found another water source. These transfers have been few and
are rare. No new certificates have been created since the beginning of the association. The property in
question was divided off and the current owners have not been successful in acquiring one of the 128
certificates in existence. Central Weld Waters system does not come far enough south and Thornton water is
not far enough north to service the property. And due to our bylaws we are not able to serve water to any
property or house that does not have a certificate. I see the property owners really have no other option but to
drill a well. Mtn. View Water Users Association's only concern with the issuing of any well permit would be if
this would impact the production, or quality of one of our existing wells. The property in question is over 5/8 of a
mile away from our closest well and your agency would have a greater understanding of ground water,
adjacent wells, and water rights. We have seen several wells drilled at closer proximity in recent years and
have never been ask for our input in the past. So this request does seem a little odd. That being said we don't
see any reason to deny this applicant based on anything we see in the application or from any other
information that we have.
Should you have any questions or comments please do not hesitate to contact me.
Mtn. View Water Users Association
Board President
PJ Goddard
303-710-1371
a
EXHIBIT
Nts•wt~i-ona
ir
To: Weld County Department of Planning Services
ATTN: Kim Ogle
From:
William and Adriann Wycoff
333 County Road 17
Brighton, Colorado
Date: April 3, 2017
7.1 rrri,rfl
PPR o 6 2017
tr t ,. it j ` ()LII UflUU I.
Qt EELLY OFFICE
Letter of Objection to Case #: USR17MMOI6 — Site Specific Development Plan and Use by Special
Review Permit for RV, boat storage, dump station, enclosed self -storage, and parking/staging of trash
containers, roll -off vehicles and/or equipment
A notice is circulating about a proposed USR Case to change current zoning from agricultural to commercial/industrial that
would allow a storage yard with the staging and parking of Trash Containers, Roll Offs, and vehicles and/or equipment to
deliver same in Section 33, by CR 2 and CR 17. We live adjacent to Section 33 and cultivate approximately 70 acres of our
property on the Southwest corner of Section 33. Currently, we raise grass hay and use the field for dog training.
In 1982, we purchased this property due to its being zoned agricultural with a licensed, operating kennel on site, Since then,
we have operated the kennel, raised a daughter born in 1985, and expanded our operation in 1999 by purchasing 80 acres in
Section 33. This part of Weld County has been a great place to live and raise our family, anchored in the fact that this area
was zoned agricultural. We continue to invest a great deal of our resources and time maintaining and developing our
properties with plans to stay here long term.
Such a project would have several negative impacts: increased, heavy vehicle traffic on an already highly used CR 2; the
introduction of large scale, 24hr lighting to our rural area; the vermin and debris that accompany roll offs and trash
containers; and, it is almost assured that such a facility will degrade the property values of the established and future residents
of Section 33.
Following are the reasons that we strongly feel this proposed permit should be rejected and the area should remain zoned
agricultural/residential:
•
•
There will be lights and noise 24/7 as people access the yard. People who have built homes in this area will have to
live with the lights and noise. One cannot consider this an improvement.
This facility will decrease the value of our properties and make them difficult to sell should we decide to leave, No
one wants to live near a "Storage Facility/Trash Depot".
There will be increased heavy vehicle traffic on already busy roadways,
it seems clear that the proposed facility has the probability of bringing in mice, rats, unwanted insects such as
cockroaches, as well as hazardous residual material in full or emptied trash containers. Most of us have driven
behind an "empty" roll off that sheds debris. There is no guarantee that the emptied containers will be totally
emptied or sanitized.
Since Section 33 was divided into eight parcels in 1999, there have been at least 19 homes built, with five in
approximately the last six years. We further understand that at least two more are soon to be built. None of them
appear to be Commercial or Industrial, The proposed land use is solidly incompatible with the current uses, the
historical trend and future expectations.
Please consider our concerns when making a decision on this case and move to deny the permit and construction of such a
project in our neighborhood. No doubt there is land much closer to Highway 85 or 1-25 that is commercial/industrial or
expected to become s o . Such sites provide better access for a project like this and would have far less impact to roadways
and existing neighborhoods.
Best regards,
Bill and Adriann Wycoff
EXH IBiT
To: Weld County Department of Planning Services
From: Rusty & Sarah Knels — Concerned landowners in Weld County
Date; 3/12/2017
Re:
FrP\froin
MAR 17 2017
Weft' County Flarmin
GREEl_LY OF FIOL
Letter of Objection to Case #: USR17-0016 — RV, boat storage, dump station, enclosed self -storage, and parking/staging of
trash containers, roll -off vehicles and/or equipment
ATTN: Kim Ogle
We recently received a notice in the mail that there are proposed plans to change current zoning from agricultural to commercial/industrial that
would allow a storage yard (RV /junk) 500 ft from our property. We purchased this property to build our dream home on and create a great place
to raise our family knowing that this area was zoned agriculture and should not change until it was annexed by a city when residential development
moved closer. We have invested a great deal of money and time into developing our property the way we want it with plans to stay here long
term.
We also find it interesting that when we contacted our direct neighbors that they have not received the same notice as us even though their
property backs up onto the same plot and is not more than 100ft from our home. This has made us question that this process is being properly
vetted and that all appropriate parties are being given the opportunity for due process to oppose such a project. We have contacted an attorney at
this point and are prepared to take any measures necessary to oppose the zoning change and approval of such a horribly placed project in a
residential/agricultural area with no business need (see figures/pictures below detailing the proximity to existing storage facilities in the area).
Furthermore, such a project would have several unwanted/unneeded impacts; poorly positioned drive approach that will only increase the
likelihood of a horrific accident on an already overcrowded undersized highway, the addition of 24hr lighting on a large scale to a rural area, and
the addition of unwanted and unscrupulous people that are attracted to facilities of this type.
Below is a list of several reasons that we strongly feel this proposed permit should be rejected and the area should remain zoned
agricultural/residential and should be used for its intended purpose.
a There are already two storage facilities that I know of on County Road 2 (between HWY 85 and I-25). One of them is less than half a mile
away and is at less than half capacity the majority of the time (see pictures from aerial view provide by county website below). What is
the need for another storage facility?
a There will be lights and noise 24/7 with people able to access the yard whenever they please, People have built homes in this location
first and will have to live with the lights and noise (not the reason we wanted to build outside of the city). I wonder if this will affect how
our children will sleep at night with beeping trucks and lights glaring in their bedrooms (which face the proposed storage facility)
• This storage facility will decrease the value of our property making it difficult to sell if we decide to leave, because let's be honest — who
wants to live next to a "Storage facility/Junk Yard"?
• Increased traffic on the roadways
• A storage facility/junk yard is a potentially dangerous place to be so close to families. I do not want my young children having access to a
dangerous place, right out our back door.
• It is an eye sore. Unless this company plans to put up a large privacy fence and a berm with a tree belt, we do not want a "storage
facility/junk yard" to be what we will look at when we sit on out on our patio, or look out our window.
I hope that you consider these concerns when making decisions on this case and move to deny the permit and construction of such a project in our
neighborhood. I also hope that you would consider that there are plots of land far closer to 1-25 that provide better access for a project like this and
would have far less impact to roadways and existing developed neighborhoods. Please remember that just because we live "out of town" it does
not mean we should be subjected to city folks junk and toy storage.
Regards,
Rusty & Sarah Knels
EXHIBIT
Location of existing storage facilities from the proposed new one:
kliosktuteaktaN.
a
Vigiee "1 =Vial IM Arimsbwi
vassissosv.
N'
us
tam
feas
amain
--ii
M
gala It
+uarrr
S
Ali
Sala
!rare
Isar
so
.ter
..,d.
oar
emu
IWO
Solar.
isms
— I
r
am.
ale4
tigr
—.
+wire
nen
ca
ist8
O toti
prt EO
C
irnwe n co in CO Ti
a is lag gi
‘Ttbb m z N a r EL :V mg°
c#1 r § 54 9 „ma . sat
CD - ..
0 13 CD rsk aF c c)
a.
CD <�
al Fin O
row ?co 61)
a)
Be: .
Cfti pr.
, 0 co
Cl)3 0
1? st
CD
En a
{ " sRiq
O— O
M OM IF
som
Ce•Il 59
to
a
ODIN
p4r6 r
Oa. WI
te \t
'fir to 111) fit
o
0 1 1 R
fi3ii 51, r
i
To: Weld County Department of Planning Services
From: James & Lori Torgerson — Concerned landowner in Weld County
Date: 3/12/2017
Re: Letter of Objection to Case #: USR1I-0016 — RV, boat storage, dump station, enclosed self -storage, and
parking/staging of trash containers, roll -off vehicles and/or equipment
ATTN: Kim Ogle
We also recently received a notice in the mail that there are proposed plans to change current zoning from agricultural to
commercial/industrial that would allow a storage yard (RV /junk) 500 ft from our property. We purchased this property 6 years
ago to build our dream home and raise our 4 children so they could join 4H utilizing the fact that this area was zoned
agriculture. We purchased horses, sheep, poultry, and rabbits. We have invested our life savings into our property for our
children's future.
We were not notified about the RV storage on County Road 17 when it was proposed, if we were, we would have opposed that
also. First) it has brought an enormous amount of traffic that don't care about the speed limit signs or the fact that this is an
area zoned for livestock, thus when animals get loose, it becomes deadly. County Road 2 was not built to handle this amount of
traffic and we did not purchase this property based on the amount danger it is now and will continue to become worse if this
permit should be approved. Second, we have all felt the increase in crime that such places bring in with the first storage facility,
the criminals come to target these places, but end up targeting us.
Finally, not only is this project jeopardizing the safety of our children, our belongings, our piece of mind, our property value, but
also the lives of all our livestock. We have all seen how business such as these, that belong in the city, bring in unscrupulous
people who think stealing, injuring, or killing an animal can be amusing. Also, the additional lights and traffic bring undo stress
to the animals and can severely affect their health and wellbeing,
We agree with our neighbors who stated:
• There are already two storage facilities that I know of on County Road 2 (between HWY 85 and 1-25) . One of them is
less than half a mile away and is at less than half capacity the majority of the time (see pictures from aerial view
provide by county website below). What is the need for another storage facility?
• There will be lights and noise 24/7 with people able to access the yard whenever they please. People have built
homes in this location first and will have to live with the lights and noise (not the reason we wanted to build outside
of the city). I wonder if this will affect how our children will sleep at night with beeping trucks and lights glaring in
their bedrooms (which face the proposed storage facility)
• This storage facility will decrease the value of our property making it difficult to sell if we decide to leave, because
lets be honest — who wants to live next to a "Storage facility/Junk Yard"?
• Increased traffic on the roadways
• A storage facility/junk yard is a potentially dangerous place to be so close to families. I do not want my young
children having access to a dangerous place, right out our back door.
• It is an eye sore. Unless this company plans to put up a large privacy fence and a berm with a tree belt, we do not
want a "storage facility/junk yard" to be what we will look at when we sit on out on our patio, or look out our
window.
We too hope that you consider these concerns when making decisions on this case and move to deny the permit and
construction of such a project in our neighborhood. I also hope that you would consider that we are just families, trying to
make a better life and put all our resources into it to do so, this proposal is from a man who has no vested interest other than
making a buck at the expense of ours and our families. Please help us keep our neighborhood safe.
Sincerely,
James & Lori Torgerson
EXHIBIT
March 13, 2017
Weld County Department of Planning
Attn: Kim Ogle
1555N 1 r Ave.
Greeley, CO 80631
RE: Case#: USR17-0016
17-0016
Kim Ogle,
We recently received an "Application Review Notification Card" for Case # U RI7-0016 for a
RV and boat storage, parking and staging of trash containers, roll -offs and vehicles and /or
equipment to pick up and deliver. Please accept this letter as our Objection to this project.
We are very concerned about many aspects of having such a business located in an area that is
zoned Agriculture and Residential. Many of the bordering properties to the named project are
residential custom homes. As a home and land owner in this area we have made a large
investment in Weld County' s future by building or purchasing the home of our dreams. Living
next to a Storage and Trash Company will significantly devalue our homes. This would also be
less than a mile away from another Storage facility currently located on County Road 19. This
would also seem to be poor planning on the County to have 2 of the same type businesses located
virtually across from each other.
Living across the street from the Brighton Outdoor storage has had its many downfalls. The first
being the continuous traffic at all hours of the day and night. The traffic from the storage facility
is significant and should be considered on an already busy street, County road 2. Having that
many vehicles on a very busy two lane road with no right or left turn lanes will cause a
dangerous traffic pattern.
Since living across from the Brighton Outdoor Storage we have experienced a lot of theft, We
have had the Weld County Sheriff come to our home at least six times to question us to see if we
have seen anything suspicious that could help them with the many break-ins and stolen vehicles
from the storage. We, as well as many of our neighbors have also had items stolen. These
storage areas are magnets for thieves.
One of the other challenges has been the noise level from the traffic, or from hobbyist working
on hot rods or other toys, commercial vehicles organizing tools and equipment to people yelling
across the storage yard.
A storage facility is an eye sore no matter where it is located but this would certainly stick out in
community built of custom homes and neighborhoods. This is a type of business that would be
better located in an Industrial or Commercial zoned area. Many other neighboring cities and
counties have found that putting this type of business in a Commercial or Industrial zoned area
has better served their communities by keeping families safe, protecting home values and roads
that are designed for high volume of traffic.
As you are considering the approval of this project please consider it as if it were your home and
family that would have to live next to a Storage and Trash facility. Our family and our neighbors
do not want this type of business in our neighborhood.
Thank you for your careful consideration on this matter,
Sheila and Robert Morelli
305 County Road 19
Brighton, CO 80603
720-275-2227
303-885-4414
Morellifam4@gmail.com
To: Weld County Department of Planning Services
From: Robert & Sheila Morelli
Date: 3-14-2017
RE: Letter of Objection to Case # USR17-0016
RV, boat storage, dump station, enclosed self -storage, and parking/staging of
trash containers, roll -off vehicles, and/or to pick up deliver
Atten: Kim Ogle
We recently received a letter with proposed plans to consider adding an RV storage facility in
our backyard. Our home currently has a RV facility (Brighton Outdoor Storage) directly in front
of us and I can't believe that Weld County would even consider putting another facility directly
behind our home. This is an Agricultural/Residential Community. It is zoned that way from the
County for the purpose of having families like my own to raise our children and nurture a ranch
and farm environment. We should ask ourselves why would we allow our neighborhoods to be
the dumping grounds for suburbia?
Living across the street about 250 feet from Brighton Outdoor Storage we have direct
experience of what it is like to live in close proximity to a storage facility.
1) Traffic that starts at 5:00 am and continues to late evening hours
2) Personal property stolen from our barn within 6 months of moving in
3) County Sheriffs and Police officers frequently called to the location for break-ins
4) Head lights from departing vehicles throughout the evening
5) Constant noise from intoxicated conversations to generators to banging tools
I could go on and on but we have had to accept what the County approved before we moved in.
It has been proven that crime goes up with storage facilities and you should have enough calls
and complaints generated to the authorities to confer.
My conversations with our neighbors who actually live on their land and have a vested interest
to protect the well being of their families/property including in most cases a custom home,
ranch equipment, and many other valuable belongings do not want anything close to them that
is industrial and does not fit the Agricultural/Residential zoning.
Please consider each resident as if it was your own home and what you would prefer for your
family if you were the one living there. We may have a community that is spread out because of
our acreages but we are a neighborhood of families that built our homes to be in the country
not in an industrial park. Also take into special consideration that this would put us sandwiched
between two storage facilities and I believe that you would not do that to anyone that resides
in Weld County,
EXHIBIT
Regards,
Robert & Sheila Morelli
305 County Road 19
Brighton, CO 80603
303 885-4414
moreElirobertmm ya hoo.c -a )
robert@summit-traic.com
lAdistidOottiti
S
togikex-
(ALS /619
o,
vbiti
NIA&
Nom'
/el
>q1ttJ1ciel
pOoi,
Prtau5k'
00- D1I WgIIS !!QS :flans d DL(t
protti
d
t.4;GY2 14/1-1
SailjeaS k. Co yChi7lifin
S10al 1/2-1
/76 Utie.
ithatil
0
4/Itsf l,O I tlI4cD ty
cffr1- �IG�IA-bl�
v...�u�� nen rrter
11 dee7.57,C5i,
s /)1/X/
(et 40 LID S
�djerf (use.
ttleskes
ei a
Ernsens
shi,c)
,e, mu //zIS/4
Pie ydu Pe�
sk �ILid r,4, r-st the
Ateers 611 i i1iYkf3
racer szta toe
as/
toe aeice
yssA�s
ofr
ro
7n5
Sd 7>ert
0/ ey /
Fyne s-
hifig3):5
0 I
rt- Q�-
�E
�- vrre rnV
fE wrNas.e� !s pantreif
pyg s i P�r,rus ill �.-P 161 (-41 :1703 fait/el es 0
efro2 /vase .0
DS*
PerWhi :011: 40
° e
0 efr
ehta /Twat erninveue
vertr-
4- -tie/
3D3 "DE67,&Q
PLANNING COMMISSION AND BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS' SIGN POSTING CERTIFICATE
THE LAST DAY TO POST THE SIGN IS MAY 26, 2017 THE SIGN SHALL BE POSTED
ADJACENT TO AND VISIBLE FROM A PUBLICALLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY
IN THE EVENT THE PROPERTY BEING CONSIDERED FOR A SPECIAL REVIEW IS NOT
ADJACENT TO A PUBLICALLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, THE DEPARTMENT
OF PLANNING SERVICES SHALL POST ONE SIGN IN THE MOST PROMINENT PLACE ON
THE PROPERTY AND POST A SECOND SIGN AT THE POINT AT WHICH THE DRIVEWAY
(ACCESS DRIVE) INTERSECTS A PUBLICALLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY.
I, KIM OGLE, HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTIES OF PERJURY THAT THE SIGN WAS
POSTED ON THE PROPERTY AT LEAST TEN DAYS BEFORE THE PLANNING
COMMISSIONERS HEARING AND THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS HEARING A SITE
SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT FOR ANY USE
PERMITTED AS A USE BY RIGHT, AN ACCESSORY USE, OR A USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW IN
THE COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL ZONE DISTRICTS (RVAND BOAT STORAGE, A DUMP
STATION, ENCLOSED SELF -STORAGE AND THE PARKING AND STAGING OF TRASH
CONTAINERS, ROLL OFFS, AND VEHICLES AND FOUR (4) INDIVIDUAL FLEX OFFICE
BUILDINGS) PROVIDED THAT THE PROPERTY IS NOT A LOT IN AN APPROVED OR
RECORDED SUBDIVISION PLAT OR LOTS PARTS OF A MAP OR PLAN FILED PRIOR TO
ADOPTION OF ANY REGULATIONS CONTROLLING SUBDIVISIONS IN THE A
(AGRICULTURAL) ZONE DISTRICT
KIM OGLE
_Name of Person Posting Sign
STATE OF COLORADO
ass
COUNTY OF WELD
it, ��-_
Signature. of Person Posting Sign
• J�
The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to me thisfr
d1 day of 1 K )cct , 2017
WITNESS my hand and official seal,
Notary Public
My Commission Expires: (41 GIO (1
KRISTINE RANSLEM
NOT,AtRY PUBLIC
STATE Cu COLORADO
NOTARY ID 20124034827
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 5
0 2020
EXHIBIT
Public hearings concerning this property will be heard before the
County Planning Commission and
Board of County Commissioners.
__ Both hearings will be held at:
ri7WEL T ADMINIS
1150 "0"
Board of County Commissioner Hearing will be held on
A Site Specific Development Plan and Use by Special
Review Permit for any Use Permitted as a Use By Right,. an
Accessory Use. or a Use By Special Review in the Cs1
Neighborhood Commercial or I.41 and i•2! Industrial Zone
Districts (RV and boat storage, a dump station, endow,
selbstnrage and the parking and staging of Trash
Containers, Roll offs, and `Vehicles and/or Equipment to pick
up and deliver same and four (4) Individual flex office
buildings) provided that the proporty is not .a lot in an
approved or recorded subdivision plat or lots parts of a map
or plan filed prior to adoption of any regulations controlling
subdivisions in the A (Agricultural) Zone District
1.`AreAcres
AT THE WELD
PLANNING SERVICES, AT 970-3►5341004 cOd-
Far Addecionel inforanation, visit viri,r..weldoountYPlbnn:in9
A ' `' FF �!ar v utir� sr 1a� a rat t�
'Q�+I,o'd wmg, ut.. iamb.. � psi -git i V171 . f3+ is7h'.+'y�►e''{�'d1 A� Ii ^1"' i .'q+..'4+ `. Y t ocio * z �Mytt�'� h1� '- s�i d� C# tt i�C f'E`�';I t, 'ra �`yi� "L
�+rt Y' �� l �yV• .
14 P
Ai
• r " , .•: }
Q4ECIFIVED
MAY 09 2017
we'd
my
ERTIFICATIO (EL
RE: NOTIFICATION OF MINERAL INTEREST OWNERS AND LESSEES �` rict
The undersigned, Applicant certifies compliance with the provisions of C.R.S.
§ 24-655-1O3(1), and in support thereof, states and certifies as follows:
1, That Applicant has provided notice, (a copy of which is attached hereto as
Exhibit "A'}), containing the time and place of the initial public hearing on its application
for Case Number USR17-0016, the nature of the initial public hearing, the legal description
by section, township and range of the property which is the subject of the initial public
hearing, and the name of the applicant;
2. That said notice was provided thirty (30) days prior to the scheduled
public hearing, that it was provided by certified mail, return receipt requested, or by
a nationally recognized overnight courier;
3. That said Exhibit A includes the list of the names and addresses of the
surface owners, mineral estate owners and lessees of mineral interests to whom the
notice was sent, including those persons who have requested receipt of such notices,
pursuant to C.R.S. § 24-65.5-103(3).
APPLICANT:
WW, LLC
Ralph Walker, Manager
State of Colorado)
)ss.
County of Weld )
Subscribed and sworn before me this day of May, 2017
Witness my hand and Seal.
My commission expires
to rgq- 2.0
EXHIBIT
cizisissecue
Notary P blic
Jeffrey R Emery
NOTARY PUBLIC
STATE OF COLORADO
NOTARY ID 20104040410
MY COMMISSION EXP IRES 10/24/2[
NOTICE OF SURFACE DEVELOPMENT Pursuant to
C.R.S. § 24-65.5.103
Pursuant to C.R.S. § 24-65.5403, the following notice of surface development is provided for
Case Number: USR17-CO15. There will be a Public Hearing before the Weld County Planning
Commission on June 6, 2017, at 12:30 p.m. in the Weld County Administrative Building, 1150 0
St., Greeley, CO 80631.
I.. Applicant: WW, LLC
c/o Ralph Walker, 9896 Rosemount Avenue, Suite 104, Lone Tree CO
2. Case No.: USRI7-0016
3, Time and Place of the Initial Public Hearing: June 6, 2017, at 12:30 .m. Weld County
Administrative Office, 1150 O t., Greeley, CO 80631
4. Nature of the Hearing: The Weld County Planning Commission shall consider a Site Specific
Development Plan and Use by Special Review Permit for any Use Permitted as a Use By Right, an
Accessory Use, or a Use By Special Review in the C-1 Neighborhood Commercial or I-1 and I-
t
Industrial Zone Districts (RV and boat storage, a dump station, enclosed self -storage and the
parking and staging of Trash Containers, Roll offs, and Vehicles and/or Equipment to pick u and
.. p P p
deliver same and four (4) individual flex office buildings) provided that the propertyis not a lot in
an approved or recorded subdivision plat or lots parts of a map or plan flied prior to adoption of
any regulations controlling subdivisions in the A (Agricultural) Zone District
5. Location and Legal Description of the Property:
Lot B of Recorded Exemption No. REC I6-0076 being part of the SE4 of Section 33, Township I.
North, Range 67 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County Colorado
North of and adjacent to County Road 2; Approximately 0.5 Mites east of County Road 17
You may have an interest in the minerals located under this property. For additional information,
please write or telephone Kim Ogle, Planner, at 970-400-3549, WeldCounty Department Planning
Sr�r►'' #1� �
Services, 1555 North 1 Avenue, Greeley, Co 80631.
Comments or objections related to the above request should be submitted in writing to the
Department of planning Services,1555 North 17th Avenue, Greeley, Co 80631
DATED:
WW, LLC
Ralph Walker, Manager
EXHIBIT A
MAILINGLIST
Mineral Leasehold Interests
Mineral Owners
firtiefisi'?afer'isectl
‘1,-Teges-a miccetfietarlimisse Strer.,
MINERAL OWNERSHIP _ ,
GRAVEL, COAL AND OTHER
MINERLS (EXCLUDINGOIL
GAS)
National Exchange Service
Corporation
1731 15th Street, Suite 103
Boulder, Colorado 80302
WORKING
INTEREST/LEASEHOLD
OWNERSHIP
INTEREST
100.00%
K1 P. Kauffman Company, Inc.
1675 Broadway, Suite 2800
Denver, CO 80202
Kerr-McGee Oil & Gas Onshore LP
PO O. Box 17 779
Denver, CO 80217
NOTES
Amoco -Charter -Schneider 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10 & 14 Wells
Amoco -Charter -Schneider B2 UA-12 Wells
Amoco -Charter -Schneider Cal & C-2 Wells
Schneider Farms 33-33 Well
TAXES
Not included in this report.
L U R S 3E EM ,1` 7 D RIGHTS OF WAY
Not included in this report.
Page 2 of 3
MINERAL OWNERSHIP .-s SAND,
GRAVEL, COAL IOW OTHER
MINERLS (EXCLUDDIG OIL
GAS)
National Exchange Service
Corporation
1731 15th Street, Suite 103
Boulder, Colorado 80302
WORKING
INTEREST/LEASEHOLD
OWNERSHIP
K. P. Kauffman Company, any Inc.
1675 Broadway, Suite 2800
Denver, CO 80202
INTEREST
100.00%
Kerr-McGee Oil & Gas Onshore LP
PF 0. Box 17 779
Denver, CO 80217
Amoco -Charter -Schneider 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10 & 14 Wells
Am000aCharterrs chnejder B2 & U -12 Wells
Amoco -Charter -Schneider co -1 & C-2 Wells
Schneider Farms 3 3-3 3 Well
NOTES
TAXES
Not included in this report.
ENCUMBRANCES, EASEMENTS _RIGHTS OF WAY
Not included in this report.
Page 2 of 3
This. Report was prepared based upon information obtained from the records of the Weld _- r .' t This
Clerk's � records. This
report is made solely for the benefit of Hill Land. Services for the purpose of assisting in a!determination
� p of the apparent
rn i neral and leasehold ownership of the captioned property with on1y y respect to the oil and gas interests.
�' �'r�teresmore complete
and thorough examination of the title may he required to confirm the above ownership with absolute certainty.
instruments ent referred to have not been examined to determine their legal sufficiency. No warranty of title
impliedf this report.
Prepared by:
Wade Hill
Hill Land Services, Inc.
700 Automation Drive, Suite H
Windsor, CO 80550
Page 3 of 3
Community
Meeting
May 24, 2017
7-8:30pm
Hampton Inn Brighton
992 Platte River Blvd
Brighton, CO 80601
acos
Community Meeting
May 24, 2017
7-8:30pm
Location: Hampton Inn Brighton
922 Platte River Blvd
Brighton, CO 80601
This invitation is for a community meeting to
discuss with the owner and developer the
upcoming development plans for 8621 CR 2.
The Weld County case number is: UM7-0016 17-0016 and
is for a Site Specific Development Plan and Use by
Special Review. The developer intends to use the
property for an RV and boat storage, enclosed self -
storage, parking and staging of roll -offs, vehicles or
equipment, and future flex space buildings.
The Planning Commission meeting will be held on
June 6, 2017 at 12:30pm in the Weld County
Administrative Office located at 1150 0 Street,
Greeley, CO 80631.
RoclicSheck
Great Clips
Big Lots
Payless ShoeSou,
Panda Express
McDonald's
el
0
Grease Monkey
crimir
3 it._J, 1-- '
It Eg-M
tilkit 15 017
a
Bran liey I n
Arby's
0
Best Western ispi
lc Brighton Inn COW
5 107
Hampton Inn Denver
I h east -Brighton
vidw;rii.egI)eparLrnen?r
GREELEY OFFICE
C.
toi
Enterprise Rent -ICI
Kim Kim Ogle, Planner
Weld County Planning Department
1555 North 17th Avenue
Greeley, Co 80531
EXHIBIT
Imo -row
✓•'•t`••y'� mow ,I Jal, . . I•
41r`. i;JM• .. I V.. I••Ij I.
�MJ•I1 K4t• •r -tr- 4tir i •t tr. 4i
1.0
IPA
•
1tV I—
I• •
•• •
II a
a
NO
•
•pliiL'1. a
. LL
a • • • 1 e ■ • J . • . I • a • • r a • 1 • a , J • 4
My name is Ralph Walker, one of the owners of the property located near your property. We
have made application for a change of use for our property. I want to respond to some concerns
expressed about our proposal.
We purchased the roll off company that has been on the site for five or more years working out
of the 6,000 sf garage building. near the home near our west border. We have operated it for over a
year and plan no change for this use that has been there for years. We do have trucks in the building at
night and at times empty roll off containers. These containers will never have any trash in them while on
the property. There has not been any trash on the property over the years and will not have any in the
future. There is no dump station associated with this use. There is no trash transfer on site.
The dump station mentioned in our application is planned for the RV storage lot fronting on
168th AVE and is nothing more than a large buried concrete vault similar to a septic tank which is cleaned
out as needed. It is used when a RV returns to storage and empties the small toilet tank in the RV. It
takes up space the size of one parking stall. A majority of our tenants will be boats, trailers and campers
without bathrooms. It is a really small part of our storage facility and has clean water to flush and clean
the area. We have installed one in each of our other storage lots after years without any concerns. I
wanted to explain as I think some imagine something associated with the roll off container business.
Some of our spaces will have covered carports. These may have solar parcels on the roof and be along
the road frontage and along a portion of the east border further screening our facility from the adjacent
property.
Our other planned use is to build self -storage units on 168th Avenue. These will be very
attractive buildings set back from the road and landscaped and be an attractive well maintained facility.
Our plans are to have a berm and landscaping along our west border in addition to either fencing or the
back side of our buildings to help screen our uses from your residences. We do not expect to have any
noise to speak of associated with the self storage units. The larger warehouse type buildings will have
some traffic but with screening and fencing and careful placement of buildings backing to your property
will minimize adverse impact to your property.
Our storage facility will have a small office and a residential unit for our full-time on -site
manager. We will have security cameras throughout our development. While we cannot assure that
there will be no crime, we plan to have adequate staffing, fencing, security gates, and cameras to ensure
the highest levels of security. Our business model would not be possible if there is an element of crime.
We take it very seriously. Lighting will be at a minimum. If we are required by fire code to light roadways
we will do so with shadow box lights shining light towards the ground not a big yard light that lights up
the neighborhood.
I understand your concerns for the rural residential area. I just want you to know that we are
committed to make a small impact in the neighborhood by having screening and landscaping and quality
construction and design. I look forward to meeting you, I hope you will come to our meeting next
Wednesday evening and we can address your concerns. Please feel free to call anytime to discuss.
Best Regards,
Ralph
303-905-4444
r aikercolorado@gmaiLcon
EXHIBIT
4""5!x- r.�Cir
Weld County Department of Planning
1555 North 17th Avenue
Greeley, Colorado 80631
TOWi = t a MAY CONCERN_
P FraFINfrn
MAY 2 5 2017
Wetti County
GFIEELEY
5/13/2017
In reference to the fetter dated May 5, 2017, notice of surface development for
Case Number USR17-0016. Stating a Site Specific Development plan and permit .
Location is Lot B of Recorded Exemption No RECX16-OO76 being part of SE4 of
Section 33, Township 1 North , Range 67 West of theGth P.M. Weld County
Coi mrarJo.
I the Mineral Owner of Oil and Gas on this property am requesting that there is
access for the Mineral Estates acquisition on the property and no Mineral rights
are compromised.
Th = you tor yo r considrrat
ff f r
Susan Malloy
1718 E State Hwy 56
Berthoud. Colorado 80513
if+
EXH IBIT
VC2414-0;30
To: Weld County Department of Planning Services
From: Jeffry M Jodi E Korbe
8289 County Road 2 Brighton, CO 80603
Date: May 38th 2017
441/2
*6* we/ 06,
41941 40,2t
ee,
CR: eite ok.,„
Cep
Re: Letter of Objection and concern to Case #: USR17-0016 regarding re -zoning to allow
RV Boat Storage, Dump Station, Enclosed Self Storage, and Roll Off Trash Operation
Attn: Kim Ogle
So to Date we have not received ANY Notice of the Proposed Plans to change the current
zoning from Agricultural to that of Commercial / Industrial that would allow someone to
have the ability to buy Land cheaply in Weld County, try to get it Re -Zoned and change the
entire dynamic of the area. We Purchase our property in late 2013 and have been slowly
developing out property to build our Dream House, we Did NOT buy this property with the
intentions of an Individual, a Group of individuals, A Company or even the County to Re -
Zone this area from anything other than the Agriculture / Ag-Residential classification.
Our Property is not more than 600 -750 ft. Directly West sharing the same road from the
proposed sites entry way yet were not notified in any form. I find it very disturbing that
we receive ALL Notices of Taxes and Tax Evaluations indicating the continued increases of
our valuation for our Property yet receive NOTHING regarding a possible project to re-
classify the Zoning that would significantly effect the value of our property and our House
that is currently under construction.
There are already several Storage facilities, CI believe there are four) in the surrounding
area that appear to NOT be at capacity and several look to be eyesores to their neighbors. 1
question the need for yet another such developed site other than the Greed of this potential
owner. I ask if he would want and build such a project in his neighborhood? I also would
like to know why they would not purchase a property more adequately suited for both the
project and the traffic that it would bring. There are Properties for Sale along both 1-25 and
Hwy 85 that are already zoned Commercial or even Industrial that would be more suited
for this type of development but this owner wants to by pass having to purchase a property
that would cost them substantially more to do so thus making it not as profitable or even
sustainable for them to pursue such a project. I ask that we protect the individuals who
have already made huge sacrifices to develop their individual properties for a Great place
to live with their families rather than something that is only going to decrease the property
values for the Homes in the area, cause unwanted Traffic and potential activity such as
crime in the area.
Our recommendation and we hope you will agree that this is not suited for this location and
would VOTE to deny any such re -zoning for not only this project but for any additional
projects that will also come along.
Thank you,
Jeffry M & Jodi E Korbe
To:
From:
Subject:
Date:
MEMORANDUM
Weld County Planning Commission
Kim Ogle, Planning Services
Modification to the PC Resolution
June 6, 2017
The Department of Planning Services requests the following citation be deleted from the staff
recommendation:
Section 22-2-20.G.7 - A.Policy 7.2 states, "conversion of agricultural land to nonurban
residential, commercial, and industrial uses should be accommodated when the subject site
is in an area that can support such development, and should attempt to be compatible with
the region,"
The site is located within the three (3) mile referral area of Cities of Northglenn and Dacono
and Adams County. The Cities of Northglenn and Dacono each returned a referral dated
April 6, 2017 indicating no conflict with their interests and Adams County did not respond to
the referral request. The property owner has been approved a commercial well from the
Division of Water Resources. The property lies outside of the Intergovernmental Agreement
Area with Weld County and is within the Comprehensive Planning area for the city of
Dacono. The City has designated this area as very low residential in their adopted
Comprehensive Land Use Plan map dated January 2005. Review of Dacono Municipal
Code, chapter 16, Article 29 outdoor storage shall only be permitted as an accessory use,
and in no case shall the storage or parking of trailers, boats, RV recreational vehicles,
vehicles, semi -trailers, cargo containers or shipping containers outdoors, or the warehousing
of goods in such containers, be permitted as the principle use.
In the City of Dacono, outdoor storage means the keeping of inventory, goods, material, or
merchandise, including raw, semi -finished, and finished materials for any period of time and
as an accessory to the primary use of the establishment, typically retail. Storage related to a
residential use, required vehicular parking areas, nurseries, and the sale of automobiles or
other vehicles shall not be considered such.
Development Standard No. 9 is requested to be deleted.
The flex buildings are restricted to the uses allowed in the Neighborhood Commercial (C-1), and the
Industrial (I-1 and 1-2) Zone Districts. (Department of Planning Services)
SERVICE, TEAMWORK, INTEGRITY, QUALITY
EXHIBIT
1/43C-0---,001(7
Submit by Email
Weld County Referral
March 06, 2017
The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review:
Applicant: WW, LLC Case Number: USR17-0016
Please Reply By: April 3, 2017 Planner: Kim Ogle
Project: A Site Specific Development Plan and Use by Special Review Permit for any Use Permitted as a
Use By Right, an Accessory Use, or a Use By Special Review in the Commercial or Industrial Zone
Districts (RV and boat storage, a dump station, enclosed self -storage and the parking and staging of
Trash Containers, Roll offs, and Vehicles and/or Equipment to pick up and deliver same) provided that
the property is not a lot in an approved or recorded subdivision plat or lots parts of a map or plan filed
prior to adoption of any regulations controlling subdivisions in the A (Agricultural) Zone District
Location: NORTH OF AND ADJACENT TO CR 2; APPROXIMATELY 0.5 MILES EAST OF CR 17
Parcel Number: 146933400029-R4470706 Legal: PART W2SE4 SECTION 33, T1 N, R67W LOT B
REC EXEMPT RE4407 OF THE 6TH P.M., WELD COUNTY, COLORADO.
The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or
recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the
above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not
received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning
Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Planner
associated with the request. Please note that new information may be added to applications
under review during the review process. If you desire to examine or obtain this additional
information, please call the Department of Planning Services.
We have re vie wed the request and find that it does / does not comply with our Comprehensive
Plan because: We have re vie wed the request and find no conflicts with our interests.
See attached letter
Clint Hebert
Signature
Agency
June 6,2017
Date
EXHIBIT
1 Vaa5
kilePociacel
Weld County Planning Dept. 1555 N 17th Aye, Greeley, CO, 80631 (970) 353-6100 ext.3540 (970) 304-6498 fax
ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORPORATION MAN (720) 9294000
1999 18TH STREET, SUITE 1800 * DENVER, COLORADO 80202
adarigpt
June 6, 2017
. EMAIL
Weld County Planning Services
Attn: Kim Ogle
1555 N 17th Avenue
Greeley, CO 80631
ko� lei �weidgov.con
NOTICE OF COAL INTERESTS AND OIL AND GAS LEASEHOLD INTERESTS
OWNED BY ANADARKO IAND CORP. R L c EE. OIL & GAS ONSHORE LP
AND E, -Mc EE GATHERING LLC
Re: LI R 17-0016
WW, LLC — Applicant
Township I North, Rank 67 West, 6th P.M.
Section 33; part of the W/2 SE/4
Weld County, Colorado
Mr. Ogle:
This letter is being submitted on behalf of Anadarko Land Corp. (`TALC") , Kerr-McGee
Oil & Gas Onshore LP ("KMOG" or the "Company") and Kerr-McGee Gathering, LLC
("KMGG") to inform you ALC owns the coal interests and KMOG is the owner of valid oil and
gas leases and K_MGG is the owner of an existing pipeline underlying all or parts of Section 33,
Township 1 North, Range 67 West ("property" or "Leased Lands"), for which WW, LLC
("Applicant") has applied for a Site Specific Development Plan and Use by Special Review
Permit for any Use Permitted as a Use By Right, an Accessory use, or a Use by Special Review
in the Commercial or Industrial Zone Districts (RV and boat storage, a dump station, enclosed
self -storage and the parking and staging of Trash Containers, Roll offs and Vehicles and/or
Equipment to pick up and deliver same).
The coal interests constitute a real property interest that entitles ALC or their lessees to
develop, operate and produce coal from the Property in accordance with applicable regulations.
ALC believes that their coal interests have significant value.
KMOG's recorded oil and gas leases are real property interests entitling it to produce oil
and gas from the Leased Lands. The Company has the right to produce from existing wells, to
maintain, rework, , recomplete, and fracture those existing wells to enhance production, and to
drill new wells to produce oil and gas, in accordance with applicable Colorado Oil and Gas
Conservation Commission regulations and Colorado Statutes. KMOG's oil and gas assets have
significant value, and the Company is consequently concerned about any development, surface
use, plan of use, PUD, zoning or rezoning, or other action by the Town that would impair or
preclude its ability to develop its oil and gas interests.
The Anadarko entities do not object to the a
proval of the subject Land Use Application
providing _ the applicant _ clearl shows the folio Jag items on the Final Develo ment Plan
(attached)
1) Existingwellhead of the Schneider Farms 33-33 and 150' setback around wellhead"
2) Existing flowline from the Schneider Farms 33-33 and its path from wellhead to the
facility on the neihb+9ri _ ro ert
3) Existing 50' ROW Grant recorded at Reception 1626748.
Please note that although .L+, KIVIOG. and CIO do not object to the proposed Development
Plan we continue to assert our ri * is to make reasonable use of the surface of the _ . ro * ert to
develop our coal interests., oitanstgas leasehold, and pipeline infrastructure.
Please contact me at 970-515:1515 if you have any questions or comments about this
matter.
Sincerely,
ANADARKO o PETROLEUM M i P ORATION
Clint Hebert
Landman
cc: Jeff Fiske, Lead Counsel
Ron Olsen
Don Ballard
Jake Billadeau
Justin. Shoulders
Paul Ratliff
To: Weld County Department of Planning Services
From: James & Lori Torgerson — Concerned landowner in Weld Countyleirdros
kr
Date: 3/12/2017
Re: Letter of Objection to Case #: IJ5R17-0016 — RV, boat storage, dump station, enclosed self= ' +, gef,and
parking/staging of trash containers, roll -off vehicles and/or equipment o
<00
01? 01 dir
I1p
ATTN: Kim Ogle Q idat
gist
�'
We also recently received a notice in the mail that there are proposed plans to change current zoning from agricultural to
commercial/industrial that would allow a storage yard (RV /junk) 500 ft from our property. We purchased this property 6 years
ago to build our dream home and raise our 4 children so they could join 4H utilizing the fact that this area was zoned
agriculture. We purchased horses, sheep, poultry, and rabbits. We have invested our life savings into our property for our
children's future.
We were not notified about the RV storage on County Road 17 when it was proposed, if we were, we would have opposed that
also, First, it has brought an enormous amount of traffic that don't care about the speed limit signs or the fact that this is an
area zoned for livestock, thus when animals get loose, it becomes deadly. County Road 7 was not built to handle this amount of
traffic and we did not purchase this property based on the amount danger it is now and will continue to become worse if this
permit should be approved. Second, we have all felt the increase in crime that such places bring in with the first storage facility,
the criminals come to target these places, but end up targeting us.
Finally, not only is this project jeopardizing the safety of our children, our belongings, our piece of mind, our property value, but
also the lives of all our livestock. We have all seen how business such as these, that belong in the city, bring in unscrupulous
people who think stealing, injuring, or killing an animal can be amusing. Also, the additional lights noise and traffic bring undo
stress to the animals and can severely affect their health and wellbeing.
We agree with our neighbors who stated;
• There are already two storage facilities that I know of on County Road 2 (between HWY 85 and 1-25). One of them is
less than half a mile away and is at less than half capacity the majority of the time. What is the need for another
storage facility?
• There will be lights and noise 24/7 with people able to access the yard whenever they please. People have built
homes in this location first and will have to live with the lights and noise (not the reason we wanted to build outside
of the city). I wonder if this will affect how our children will sleep at night with beeping trucks and lights glaring in
their bedrooms (which face the proposed storage facility)
• This storage facility will decrease the value of our property making it difficult to sell if we decide to leave, because
Let's be honest — who wants to live next to a "Storage facility/Junk Yard"?
• Increased traffic on the roadways
• A storage facility/junk yard is a potentially dangerous place to be so close to families. I do not want my young
children having access to a dangerous place, right out our back door.
• It is an eye sore. Unless this company plans to put up a large privacy fence and a berm with a tree belt, we do not
want a "storage facility/junk yard" to be what we will look at when we sit on out on our patio, or look out our
window.
We too hope that you consider these concerns when making decisions on this case and move to deny the permit and
construction of such a project in our neighborhood. I also hope that you would consider that we are just families, trying to
make a better life and put all our resources into it to do so, this proposal is from a man who has no vested interest other than
making a buck at the expense of ours and our families. Please help us keep our neighborhood safe.
Sincerely,
James & Lori Torgerson
D3a-CicicP g 3 7
i Qr
i ' fly
-- re:
r . i ..s .. i_ Y III 44e. W
'APO. T_v
sa - ,�.y� • ti�.s __i a 'd. a
e- r
r a
.y 1 orJ
' r -r.
L� . . _ �,1-.7.
14—:111:1-1";:"::::":-1Tl L - la yet, at Tin, _ _ rear,..e a.�
1
•4 • M
Yb
J k .
•
41
1
.t it', 'grief I-4 Vic et.
'N� p •
_ 4- : .1 -4 . x.1,1 ' II S+ � �� • • ..M Y e '7. - .>w A►s!.."�
- 7' F- .1 _ 1t.� .1 _.f. • 9 itr ia
/ Y
i}. • a •_1 +.1 r 1-•
A- i. .1 er --Ili-; ,f••''4.14,44-.1* Air .I =.1 1� ��'y�y� .L• 4✓
tt, att.3 ' •j 1.7.4 -Aar -s_ 1 - 4
` _ - •' T 1 1�`-rr 1 at r.� •,' kill, /M
i'
1 e't - - a.. sp..,
, wr - • .1 P��?4�1 7
w
r fin+ _
:-tiki:4"..iffir*-- . 4 4 `.• :-.:... 4: .I 'Ir.:
: i {r e ' �:
� r- 1
M• •-'lit
%• J i1. -"•. ��y�.y lid
i� i n - r 11.411 •-,.. • • "i_r ' S - r"` _t _a ▪ "} it lo
_r li. . . 4": qt la 4
• i .J14� R• • �1 F •D' -y ri _l'�le1Y Yet 1,j �.�1
_ 1..1
.. I 13,
t i, j r1 f . , y . la 144alt- ill .' �' r l:.a Yr
,,
r. 4144
1
..' lc -711.
/� • .`fir ."-;..-::$7:14,;:,..; 427:141.11:4••.:
�.'. V ��
#v41 r {-
•
...
r. - • -r • 4Y
4 •rt •�1 -a . a ir.all• '
•Mfr -1I.
'tk /t - l e�
1 . r - :
a, :4
te• '. w • 1
• It.t 44.. -t- y ilk
a I`- 1
-,.." ...;• ......4,. Ha:: 7Se its - -- -,tit- -. • r i-+� ft., -
• -• - ....
..� 1 s !...; �• v‘.., . .- -..
-• i'3 - t'. li
S♦., YRL"JM .
�r9r
- a.,4,4
.
tir tee*
t =-- i•I ��y;
4• ( y - ` :.4YAJJiI41r' .�� ',�e.. . r .w r
•
•
4_
l
r -
s. 'r •� - a II '' II.a0n
I�3airl:1,11'111-‘,;1::.:
^rrf 7 II -"A.
.�1 F1
Li I
-
I a r t. y r
', : .f Q _�l► f r,
. 7 �' i-4 .�:
u
r _
k1. r'.
1 ,, + n.`. , 4
r ► err _ -r it. A, •
. �..
m
I e '}R .air 'a u.
,0? 72.- s-' .t_$ r.li_SA.., Ita. -e ��-r
' [-dLer fi r.i s. .. �___� sr f .� It
` ` �' =rilirt—+ -- sett ,48 l I r- t t;T I. tJ , , s+ ..+ • +S- 'i t -r .
'f l ao � 1.. c'rrt4 .= s� by _C'+ 4._.- ^ '.
oa / /. 1a I' 1 1a 3t♦�,r '�:tali,
rX , .
�°` �. t
ir
A ..;Vitt"' 7 i!1 .. ' la 1 1'i: data4 1 / �_ _r," J^ a •e b
'l 'Pt lIC . I. z - Via' 44" -
a
1 _ 1, 'a �. •,Y '. -, a"'ry� ;:. ,:iii 1..iii. ill: 1 T s ^ ,Il .,y `t .-j' 1 If _ i rn s� Ti.-..aA •
. r it:
{y r? • ' •` i/ a �r - sift. 1 _ - Y iw u f t 4 -
.� ti.,'t,i _ }r '$„' A „r• aar • y• - L r:42.,• .„till N ~e
+ t -w t "y_' •ii4 r a. t tt r , r :� i �'- 'M
i )a /i' I .- - y - l 'a p •y �.� r .�.' :.'AID Ys'`_r " t
M ( - r- / 'TY • ' — r s t` s M M1 s / +t 4' ... _ 1 "I t sr
'l f . t t "
� --s ipp s �s.jill}s a< - e • ft
•
4
I
.t4
4, ♦7,9
1
a I
•s .
• •
s
r 11 I - �
.' t_
C-
'. Jr 1
•
1
42 r
-
r•.
w3
1
1 a n ry..
w f• ark 4 5'
r -
-.. a -. -al i4:r
-T C t:
r
s Y 7-
1•
1 ..
. �r
N. -1 -
rt
P
s ^,
V.. .--
bl
-t'hl
. . •t.'at ▪ �— n -'
r4 q r
t
r
a Ai
at�a
t�r1R
St -
4
- . • ..a:r
.) cillihr4i
a .. - C
. ,t
P -.fa , 1
r
"r5
Aar'
r1 + ;y � ft.
r. �.+ _ .R 1_I, ptr 4 < tr t e
a -
w
•
• _ nsANC -▪ :•
S• ' �.1. *WW1
rig
let
-re_
•
t�t j'it ,L� ▪ ( � is
t ♦ 4 4ai-1•''
y Y1
lir to
• i TI ' r ts1115.
apt
. - as _ aAd•r.
t e l� '1t
•
-_..< --Aar
s
gt-
Cr .r -
: �1 p. ai3
TA •- -
ar -.� a. 17r', Y - ` p. �,1 t!rr' ['
a • x' '4 �_ - sd - ! t om
t�ti �:r - .ter - t"r -a ,�1• erg -1 '1 i tY�t w I�
-as . 1 Y . r• asa '•n•t - - . 1 c i `at`I I' � �av f: �'Y ' ' ...
i �. f � �. cell �f a# D'ar r I tv . - It- � Hl
M
u • it •r ,• ;ratTti « talk
-ft Seas
• ;iii . _ •
- �--} 'a al
_ r _ - : •tor -�Y f. tilt*
4-.4.-
r
ti ,
1 ra l'474 .-/I t ,�
N f r Y,
}ra.4.4"y a�
Act
_ 44 its 1 rZ• • r -1t` sira L 1 •fit 1 Is
h V •
7111 —
�•E
444:
• -*
I -
a r
♦ I. •
sY_
Hello