The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20172630.tiffAugust 2, 2017 CLERK TO THE BOARD PHONE (970) 400-4226 WEBSITE: www.co.weld.co.us 1150 O STREET P.O. BOX 758 GREELEY CO 80632 KEVIN AND TINA PAPACHEK 909 N. 7TH PLACE JOHNSTOWN, CO 80534 NOTICE OF INVALID APPEAL Account No.: R1261197 Dear Petitioner: The Weld County Board of Equalization ("CBOE"), pursuant to Colorado law, has authority to hear petitions for appeal from persons whose objections to, or protests of, excessive, erroneous, or illegal valuation have been refused or denied by the County Assessor. However, for tax year 2017, the County Board of Equalization may hear only those matters which were received by the CBOE, or postmarked on or before July 15, 2017, for real property, or July 20, 2017, for personal property. Your petition was not timely received at the prior Assessor's appeal level; therefore, the County Board of Equalization does not have jurisdiction to hear your appeal and thus, your petition is dismissed. Very truly yours, BOARD OF EQUALIZATION Esther E. Gesick Clerk to the Board Weld County Board of County Commissioners cc: Christopher Woodruff, Assessor 2017-2630 AS0097 Cheryl Hoffman From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Hi Cheryl, Courtney Anaya Monday, July 24, 2017 2:29 PM Cheryl Hoffman Esther Gesick RE: R1261197 Based on the notes, it looks like they did appeal at the Assessor level, but the appeal was turned in after the deadline so no appeal was created. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks! Courtney Anaya Analyst Weld County Assessor's Office (970) 400-3670 canaya@weldgov.com Confidentiality Notice: This electronic transmission and any attached documents or other writings are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify sender by return e-mail and destroy the communication. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action concerning the contents of this communication or any attachments by anyone other than the named recipient is strictly prohibited. From: Cheryl Hoffman Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 2:22 PM To: Courtney Anaya <canaya@weldgov.com>; Esther Gesick <egesick@weldgov.com> Subject: R1261197 How should I proceed with this one? I cannot locate the R1261197 Account #. Cheryl Hoffman Deputy Clerk to the Board Weld County Clerk to the Board Office 1150 O Street Greeley, CO 80631 970.400.4227 2017-2630 1 Account Number . L2,6119 7 Parcel Number JO 90$c X1' 63 Owner Name Jf et// 1L inn,4 PAtec 4 Phone Number %C�-,%Qe-mail 41711'" j/G©/17,s, cc2) REAL PROPERTY QUESTIONNAIRE Attach additional documents as necessary. MARKET APPROACH RECEIVED JUL 242017 WELD COU�1 TY COMMISSIONERS This approach to value uses comparable sales from the appropriate time period to determine the actual value of your property. The following items, if known, will help you estimate the market value of your property. If available, attach a copy of any appraisal or written estimate of value. Have similar properties in your immediate neighborhood sold within the 18 -month data gathering period? DATE SQLD PROPERTY ADDRESS SELLING PRICE ,9i /1/7 ie' ,09Z ,,Ars/��-h (. G. n Based on these sales and accounting for differences between sold properties and your property, state the value of your property. $a 7S C2OJ COST APPROACH (For -Residential Properties Only) This approach to value uses replacement struction costs from the appropriate time period to determine the value of your property. The following items if known, will h • you estimate the replacement cost of your property. YEAR BUILT UILD List all changes made to your property prior to Ja expansion of storage area; addition to parking, se DATE DESCRI IO ORIGINAL CONSTRUCTION COST ary 1 of the current year, i.e., remodeling of storefront; or manufacturing area. N • F CHANGE COST Is your structure in typical condition for i : age? If ot, why? Based on the replacement cost of • nstruction and of any ch of your property. $ nges, including depreciation, state the total value INCOME APPROA (For Non -Residential P oparties Only) This approach to value converts economic net come m the appropriate time period into present worth. If the property was rented or leased, attach ope property. Indicate square foot rental rate for all tenants. tta If known, list rents of comparable properties. If available, attach operating statements s wing re If an appraisal using the income approa was con g statements showing rental and expense amounts for this rent and lease schedule) nta nd expense amounts for comparable properties. ducte , please attach. FINAL ESTIMATE OF VALUE State your final estimate of the property's value. 15-AR-DPT ARL VOL 2 1-84 Rev 10-09 2017-2586 I have never received a NOD. I appealed online. So 1 called the assessor's office and talked to Nikki on Monday July 10th. She said someone would be calling me back. I did not receive a call back. So I called again and talked to Nikki again. She said a Dee Kayl would be getting ahold of me. As of this morning no one has called me back. I am writing this the morning of July 15 2017. I will email the assessor's office this morning and also take this to the post office mail it out this morning to the assessor's office and the board of equalization. I believe the 91,699 increase is very excessive. Below were the 4 properties in my sub -division I submitted with the first appeal My house: 2756 square feet including the basement. 3 Bedrooms and 3 Baths 902 N 7th PI: Sold 12-11-2015 $265,000 5 Bedrooms and 2 baths Land .33 Main Level: 1428 Basement: 1402 Total Square Footage: 2830 Also you just accessed the value for my neighbor across the street at 933 7th St for $280,000. His square footage is 3144 and he has 5 Bedrooms and 3 Baths. The land is .26 Impared to mine: 909 N 7th PI: My square footage is 2756 with only 3 bedrooms and 3 baths. My land 29 I disagree with the Assessor's decision, and I am appealing the decision. I believe the increase of over 35% is not justified. As stated in my first appeal I believe $275,000 is a fair adjustment. Based on all the examples provided nY re. ✓• ea •I ice. er rss. a --r♦ ..♦ �- Kevin Phek apac 7/15 /2017 ti • ' Hello