The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20173769.tiffRESOLUTION RE: ACTION OF THE BOARD CONCERNING REVIEW OF CONDITION OF APPROVAL #1.C OF 5TH AMENDED USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT, 5MJUSR17-83-542 - DCP OPERATING COMPANY, LP (MEWBOURN GAS PLANT) WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, on July 17, 2017, by Resolution #2017-1596, the Board of County Commissioners approved the application of DCP Operating Company, LP ("DCP Operating"), 3620 W. 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado 80631, for a Site Specific Development Plan and 5th Amended Use by Special Review Permit, 5MJUSR17-83-542, for Mineral Resource Development Facilities, Oil and Gas Support and Service, Natural Gas Processing Facility, and the addition of new gas processing equipment to improve capacity and efficiency of the existing plant and one (1) up to one hundred (100) feet in height secure communications tower (Mewbourn Gas Plant) in the A (Agricultural) Zone District, on the following described real estate to -wit: Lot A of Amended Recorded Exemption, AMRE-591, and Lot B of Corrected Recorded Exemption, CORR RE -3203, being part of the SE1/4 of Section 35, Township 4 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners is in receipt of a request from DCP Operating Company, LP, to determine satisfaction of Condition of Approval #1.C of 5th Amended Use by Special Review Permit, 5MJUSR17-83-542, and WHEREAS, on November 1, 2017, the Board of Commissioners reviewed the Department of Planning Services staff comments and heard the testimony presented, and deemed it advisable to continue to Monday, November 6, 2017, at 9:00 a.m., to allow DCP Operating Company, LP, to research and submit landscaping elevations, and WHEREAS, on November 6, 2017, the Board of County Commissioners reviewed the submitted landscaping elevations and finds that the updated Landscaping/Screening Plan proposed by DCP Operating, Company, LP, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, satisfies Condition of Approval #1.C. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the updated Landscaping/Screening Plan and related elevations proposed by DCP Operating, Company, LP, to satisfy Condition of Approval #1.C of 5th Amended Use by Special Review Permit, 5MJUSR17-83-542, be, and hereby is, found to be acceptable and reasonable. cam• PL c tco/ mm) QG P OlfI- f 2017-3769 PL0493 REVIEW OF CONDITION OF APPROVAL #1.C OF 5TH AMENDED USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT, 5MJUSR17-83-542 — DCP OPERATING COMPANY, LP PAGE 2 The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 6th day of November, A.D., 2017. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD CO; NTY, COLORADO ATTEST: datAvo �' ;ok Weld County Clerk to the Board BY: C(;ZOD.,9,�. �Q APP puty Clerk to the Board Jamie A. Cozad, Chair Steve Moreno, Pro -Tern Sean P. Conway AYE (AYE) (AYE) AYE County ttorney �;�� , �, �I�• NAY arbara Kirkmeye Date of signature: k'a let 17 2017-3769 PL0493 MEMORANDUM To: Board of County Commissioners From: Kim Ogle, Planning Services Subject: 5MJ USR 17-83-542 Condition of Approval Landscape Plan Date: November 1, 2017 The Board of County Commissioners conditionally approved 5MJUSR17-83-0542 on July 17, 2017 for DCP Operating Company, LP for a Site Specific Development Plan and 5th Amended Use by Special Review Permit No. USR-542 for Mineral Resource Development Facilities, Oil and Gas Support and Service, Natural Gas Processing facility, and the addition of new gas processing equipment to improve capacity and efficiency of the existing plant and one (1) up to one hundred (100) feet in height secure communications tower in the A (Agricultural) Zone District. (DCP Operating Company, LP — Mewbourn Gas Plant) on July 17, 2017. Condition of Approval 1.C states "A landscaping/screening plan to mitigate visual impacts shall be submitted to the Department of Planning Services after consultation with area property owners." DCP held two (2) community meetings with area property owners after the USR hearing: August 16 and September 12, 2017. At the August meeting DCP proposed: 1. The addition of a 16 -foot prefabricated metal screening walls to extend the existing barrier wall on the west side of the property 2. To modify existing chain -link fencing to provide additional screening on the east side of the property 3. To add a row of trees on the west side of the 16 -ft screening wall for visual interest Community feedback to the DCP proposal indicated area property owners requested: 1. Using alternate materials for the screening walls 2. Adding landscaping features like a berm 3. Adding more screening on the east side of the property At the September 12, 2017 meeting DCP presented a new plan based on the area property owners suggestions. 1. To use precast concrete walls designed to resemble stone instead of corrugated metal for the extension of the screening wall along the west side of the facility. 2. To modify existing chain -link fencing on the east side by inserting matte finished aluminum slats to provide a visual barrier along this side of the property, as well as on the south side of the property 3. To use groups of evergreen trees in locations selected to lineup with adjacent residences and to install a drip irrigation to support the existing and new vegetation 2017-3769 Community feedback to the DCP proposal indicated area property owners requested: 1. Requested a review of new approaches to add additional sound mitigation on the west, north and east of the site through use of sound reduction walls similar to those used at well drilling sites 2. Adding tall (25 feet +) earth berms 3. Adding multiple rows of "full-size" deciduous shade trees and evergreens, as well as native grasses. Based on comments received from the area property owners during the August and September 2017 meetings, DCP and their landscape architect consultant developed a Landscape design that includes an elongated five-foot berm along the northwestern perimeter of the property. The berm, is approximately 2100 feet in length and 50 feet wide, planted with medium sized trees on the berm, primarily pine and spruce evergreen trees with native grasses. In concept, trees will be planted in patterns resembling natural groupings and will utilize native grasses. The Department of Planning Services reviewed the proposed Landscape Plan for the Mewbourn Gas Plant Facility and offers the following comments: The south and east side of the facility have the greatest restrictions primarily due to the construction of the plant infrastructure and the future right-of-way associated with County Road 35. The proposal of a continuous blank wall in the form of matte finish slats placed within the existing chain link fencing creates no visual interest. It is recommended that the flat fence wall should be broken up with shallow rooted shrubs or native grasses planted in natural groupings to avoid underground infrastructure encumbrances. The north side of the facility has a concrete wall that contains existing equipment within the Mewbourn 1 gas plant. There are constraints here due to an emergency/ maintenance access road and the irrigation canal. In lieu of a single row of trees, it is recommended that trees be placed in a triangular configuration and utilize an upright evergreen tree in form. The west side of the facility has three design elements proposed. The proposed berm, limited palette of evergreen trees and native grasses and a large blank split faced tan colored concrete wall. Without knowing the specific level of sub -surface constraints on this side of the facility it is difficult to provide a specific comment. In general, it is suggested that the approximately 1740 feet in length and a minimum of 15 feet in height sound barrier wall system flanking the Mewbourn 3 gas plant be broken up with shrubs or native grasses planted in natural groupings. There may be opportunities for a climbing vine to grow on the walls thereby softening the wall. The natural grouping of plant material does not necessarily need to abut the wall, rather extending the plantings away from the wall and into the parcel may be beneficial and not contrived. This sound wall does not enclose the Mewbourn 3 gas plant facility. Was this action intended? Without a provision for a wall adjacent to unmaintained County Road 38 or a means to mitigate plant noise to the south, a vacant parcel of land, will the facility be able to maintain the 65 dB(A) operating levels at this location. The proposed sound wall is generic in description and offers no specific information as to manufacturer, sound mitigation effectiveness and construction methods to be employed for the erection of the wall. While this component of the Landscape plan is an engineered solution to a specific component on the property, it may be beneficial to have additional information on this structure. It is suggested that mitigation techniques be employed and surround the facility on all sides, especially in light that there is a vacant parcel of land that in the future may development. The proposed artificial elongated lineal earth berm approximately 2100 feet in length, 50 feet width and 5 feet in height located near the edge of the property line and planted with two evergreen species and native grasses may provide screening in 10+ years if watered and fertilized according to landscape standards. The visual aesthetic offers limited to little visual interest. It is suggested that the berm be increased in height in areas, offering an undulating form of hills, slopes and valleys and perhaps the width of the berm modulates. It is also suggested that in addition to the evergreen trees, a native shrub component be introduced to create interest and provide a hedgerow of mixed native plantings, including grasses that would thrive in the soil conditions, aspect, climate and the unknown subsurface encumbrances. It is also suggested that small bumps of earth berms in the landscape be constructed to compliment the larger undulating earth berm and provide a slight topographic change in grade to create interest. There are two locations having a lineal row of trees that appear to be artificially placed for screening of a specific resident or residents. The first location is adjacent to the west property line and north of and adjacent to County Road 38. Similarly, there is the same lineal form of the plantings on property owned by DCP Operating Company, LP yet not included in the Special Use Permit boundary. This property is located east of County Road 35 and north of and adjacent to County Road 38. It is suggested that the lineal form of the plantings be enhanced with the trees, shrubs and grasses planted in patterns resembling natural groupings at both locations. This action may be accomplished by adding trees away from the lineal form in a naturally appearing stand of vegetation. The Mewbourn Gas Plant Landscape Plan as proposed is very structured, almost artificial in appearance and does not lend itself to appearing as a native and natural stand of vegetation indicative of the Front Range and Eastern Plains. Comments outlined herein are suggestions only for consideration that may well enhance the overall plan and the visual interest that will be the resultant. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' SIGN POSTING CERTIFICATE THE LAST DAY TO POST THE SIGN IS OCTOBER 20, 2017 THE SIGN SHALL BE POSTED ADJACENT TO AND VISIBLE FROM A PUBLICALLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY. IN THE EVENT THE PROPERTY BEING CONSIDERED FOR A SPECIAL REVIEW IS NOT ADJACENT TO A PUBLICALLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES SHALL POST ONE SIGN IN THE MOST PROMINENT PLACE ON THE PROPERTY AND POST A SECOND SIGN AT THE POINT AT WHICH THE DRIVEWAY (ACCESS DRIVE) INTERSECTS A PUBLICALLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY. I, KIM OGLE, HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTIES OF PERJURY THAT THE SIGN WAS POSTED ON THE PROPERTY AT LEAST TEN DAYS BEFORE THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS HEARING FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE SITE LANDSCAPE PLAN ASSOCIATED WITH A SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND 5TH AMENDED USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT NO. USR-542 FOR MINERAL RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT FACILITIES, OIL AND GAS SUPPORT AND SERVICE, (NATURAL GAS PROCESSING FACILITY, THE ADDITION OF GAS PROCESSING EQUIPMENT AND ONE (1) UP TO ONE HUNDRED (100) FEET IN HEIGHT SECURE COMMUNICATIONS TOWER IN THE A (AGRICULTURAL) ZONE DISTRICT. (DCP OPERATING COMPANY, LP - MEWBOURN GAS PLANT). KIM OGLE Name olf Person Posting Sign Signature oon Posting Sign STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. COUNTY OF WELD ) The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to me this WITNESS my hand and official seal. altuditteri Notary Public My Commission Expires: (4-1Jf)� day of U6Mlbir 2017 iwtek•.tagel. ,...,.••.,•--,.,_,..-,e +•••••.......• •. . KRISTINE RANSLEM NOTARY PUraE C SATE OF C * LORADO NOTARY ID 20124034827 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 5, 2020 wtY^•:Ri'^!!,.'.'-Tfi.'"'IM7..er4Trl.'.4.':A't7iY'r.7abr+fh:•.f •,' .,.*-...:....'^A ":`t.te�'r 1•r,..,..•Wt.. '. . Public hearings concerns II be heard before the County Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners. Both hearings will be held at: Re°Oe$' REVIEW OF THE PRQPOSEDDCP MEWBOURN GAS PLANT LANDSCAPE PLAN 44Vcres: J24 #Li-. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT AT THE WELD COUNTY DEPARTMEN T OF PLANNING SERVICES. AT 970-353-6100. extq For Additional Information vts,t w,_N,eldcountypianningcases.org A T r. 4 t?ON F--- rooted �`�'1td ='CY�•i�h.>/tj/ � ^-1 cue j ir..�:[ in .. a k �; �, : t fleveiop'n su till nun )� . r �1. Stre and the tteriSae.c a f RAW* CIVIr ij re ieko-, cl mkt* 'N4(it wit i�•hfh'I f 17iU;•'CL'S- t!(.:,ir 4 tl ��JT+t'iHKi�/ Rfl'flt/nyt and tKKnbtw of 1ittW+. i 'tt*W-+ J7'4 mkt* 't" *» ^�'nf : both the pits ifrilt}g 4.O!•trttrzingp U71(I (rvKite !3i [ a'liljin. :....".m it MffIOttri Nanning". LL W 0 U t R— N— N — R N N 0 m m r n N s 2.1 e rn N O 1 I Ci - WI w ,1 I i l 1 . I , 1 . I . i 1 I 1 l . l J I I 1 l 1 . 1 . I 1 1 1 . l . I I 1 1 I l 1 . I . 1 1 I . J � , 1 l 1 1 l I I l , 1 I I I . i l CO rCHECKED BY: C.AW DATE: is/3/i7 DWG NO. c-1 ISSUE A . . . I . . . I . . . I . . . I f . if oz M IX WPM 7.1=1 WELD COUNT MEWBOURN II SIGHT LINE SECT! #1 NEIGHB [DRAPED BY: sae icfi W O cr ' UW W I Z I Q.laJ .1 CL CC it d p. :. G a s 1 '! .3.i ' o f \i ..K y(° 0 It ' Z� D '4t ,ai"t I Y Pn 1 1 - `., 6II Q .,.4. 1 j[r• I I .vKaRS;P ...,. , ' 11 1 .:l - CO Y CC Cr i. N ' I O N 1W CC., yi..l ( t iti CC 3 NJ CY O O 14 W' U •... x•a �. W ~ 1 I U !.. I . , 'y 'I. , is ' 1 I u Q 'T'f •' Y.> 4. g1 n•,f: atk4'• Cr 1 �I� 4.'i ' 0 _ . _ 01 ,, •r J , crO A4; ►- O Z 1 Q 'A b �- W z 1 Cr• X N �W Jh O_ `WI, F ogee >jF';p-.• 1 1a . 1 tip... 1 1 in _ 1 16 W N w 5 o g ''' CY 0 in o a t4Um =� N: _rs . • ,a In•YK '4eI71. J•1.' •al al .4 1 W .II JIM 1 N _CC cr w ia 1 O a 1 a W a O imms a WI - Z a a a w tom N 49)1N� m O 43 S w OMB Ic .1%••. a 03 W as f a a NIII 0 al J _ o CCn 1 a S ( � - = i.0 co < (..) M s I C) Q ..�_ I 8 _. 1 _ 1 "W ... 1 z8 �- IX 4 4S.- w m . I 0C' w0 p 1 _ 1 1 j 1 . = __' {/� T. .�' w •w> il ��4.1aell i .<'{ Fri BI-_---, N �m m= OW W Z 2• • 1143 SECTION: SIGHT LINE FROM #1 W VIEWPOINT 0 5' ABOVE GROUND FROM III NEIGHBOR'S VIEW 4N o° aI i> DE W W la v z ig a v Z 7 w08Oin & m 0 QH w —J w SCALE: NTS HORIZONTAL SCALE = VERTICAL SCALE — -- 1 i . 1 , IIIIIIIIII I r r r i . r r i . r T r T i i 7 r r 1 i r i 1 l T r r i 1 I i 1 1 ! i 1 r ! ) is D CA CC 0 0 z 2 J 1 C! LL W O U N N- N — en_ �y • • - n- 41..4 a- r, - N- 0 I- (/) K I I . 1 I I I 1 I , 1_ r 1 1 9 Kir VS 4R 6 Z I I , 1 I I I I III a 1 1 O co iz m O Z N E 2 C) O ce o u- u) W l7 W J Pim O 2 s (7) z Z is.. Z O W Ow> S > J Y •+ - Z - 1 . . al I I I 1 I ail t I 1 I MEWBOURN 3 N Is Z ft Z r I- 7 [ r N K r , I I I I- I I I a 0 Z i T J m O N N LaJ O 0- la C, m 8 W N O 6 Li O f- ta • m O 6 15o I W O H —r • .*•"Y@, zs*8�k "1: y,z 1--1 t. ; 41e.• 0 ail 1014 . irt 7e, _ %. • Gus In re • 3 Zto x ryj I w Zr W N tY m P N O W � W 3 `y CC .Zf mUgto .1 O N M W m CC Ce I- th 3 ~ 'S � IsI- - �g 7 60 co - v.) 5 0 SC) N CO n 1 I r I I I O I. w O I I 1 I MEWBOURN III GAS P U m t I W y4 SIGHT LINE SECTION & ELEVATION 02 NEIGHBOR'S VIEW YW 5 a DWG NO. c-2 s a z WF g D to S a g ELEVATION: LOOKING SOUTHEAST FROM NEIGHBOR #2 U ce Z O N to 2 I 1 ♦ I I I r I I i w O U I w 4 • O D n N n R A > > CO a Q a . I . . . 1 , . . 1 - . . . 1 . . I . . . . . I . . . \ - Z nt \ it _\ 1 tai C7 N � MI W\ i ,\ MO - J r\ wo �\ ce 0 ~I Y \ us a z I 1 0o \ I \ I N \ N m e en N c s m .o r. N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 9 LIJ a a C z� o < J ce < W I- CC N I I I I I I I 1 I I I t� I I I I I I O v N PROPERTY BOUNDARY z U 5 w co Ee O co w M 2 O re w 9 z O w Cl) c X 5 FOR CLARITY) MEV/BOURN 3 a S 00 oa wo� te U ID uz w w z 0cc3 z8 N W�j I LL W re <X Ztsi a Z .-0CAa w 2 • N cc : W � • .tf � L a: m W tu in j d ' 2i U)° W im k N cc m W )- 0 W O I cc _I p V) M t �a a8 W a 6 Or am Ico N 0 1 O 0 n 51 O 1 U SIGHT LINE SECTION & ELEVATION #3 NEIGHBOR'S VIEW 11 W a S C C a a DWG NO. C-3 6 a 07 It 0 2 z O re 1J - co w O O z O J O I J w c IVTI ) I 1 In K 0 0. Tiff -ITT -ITT TUT Z 2 J Y T ITTITITTITT T . . r T . . 1).T1)11111 = 0 LL w O U m t M n- zy m - N_ f_ en C - In M- DEMETHANIZER N cc I TEG I I I I I I i I I 9 t O 1 N N 2 O I In 2 tO N N 1O N 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I z 0 a 0 a I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I WI Z iI "I N I I I I I w J W 0 O O ttn I O Z am W I FF O az 3 I I I I I I z I I SECTION: SIGHT LINE FROM #4 NEIGHBOR'S VIEW tilt . 1 t I t I t t 1 1 N INLET p d' W D CC 0 am I- D O Iw 0U 0Z —J Y U D IY I - J w3 C U w O� U Q < 0 I -Z D to 0 ce 0 N w aI- 0 in � Laj €kl D U Q W C IYmW a W NJ w W O H W 0 I- 0 0 o0 CC 0 CL Om U In to W O CCO 0 am U O tn Cc COW N j stI 03c� I I 0 1 � itg rbd 4%IVI U I I 04 NEIGHBOR'S VIEW t O O d co 80 N r7 to O N N ri 0 co 2 W Z 2 0 cn O 0 0 0 J 0 H` J w 13 a 5 • 5 g E m A C T a. I r T T I r 1 r T I I TT r T r 1 N (n cr0 I T 0 TIT TITET 1 I I r I I f z 2 J Y 1 1 r 7 VIII I I I I T TV T 1 = V LL W T O O 1-1 IT II T I I I • I I . I I I I . . . I • I . I I I <1 ti I 1 0 U l I . . I . m I 1 J JI n n M— n — R N N N N_ R- M_ oft — IO— n_ N I I . 1 . ILIA. . 1 / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / DEMETH Inc In �z 0 O m Z 0 n CD 00 2 �6 5-au.q•5 / / / / 4J / 2/ TEG CONTACTOR a a N NC mN c • X • W 0 0'- in wit O ffi cc in I I I I I I I I I I W X0 am 20 N 4. h i0 10 20 a It) 40 N N 10 O N d W So cc to 2 Z _ 2 O rt W " 8 Z o J 2 O N z r VZ Z O- ✓ O as 0 2> N MEWBOURN MEWBOURN LJo Cc O am Z O tL w ccOa-g W 1 I D C2 ski b C" m W (-) W -O ace �Za►- CC 0 O zQ m Z W O U 0 W O W Z<L G N X Z W Z 2 U CC W NN_ Q a' P3 0 2 W 0 C v OU W 'c' 0. a Om U Z H W S NC Z Z Mr OD I- ktnXW• W. o?aC*° amltr7CI W U z cr O W le Z Z O" O F - Q 2 Za � mp a' CW.JO W uj W CCC V) O V) PO CC cr oLAJ CC UQ 03 D In 0 0 40 g 2 #5 NEIGHBOR'S VIEW 5 W U G z a CQ a DWG NO. C-5 • 6 I a z W 0 N - N - g - Ip _z to O IL to W Z 2 O ce u_ co Z -2 in O O ZII O > 2 W ° J W _ TIT T I- - N r I N R r TT I IT IT I FT I r ) 7 C ET T1 1 r T TIT r I J O a. O Z T i 1 7 I r 1 I I I f r I I r J Z • O u. Lai C U w Esther Gesick From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Kim Ogle Tuesday, October 31, 2017 8:37 AM Tisa Juanicorena; Esther Gesick Tom Parko Jr.; Michelle Martin FW: DCP Landscape Plan/Mewbourn DCP midstream Mewbourn LS Plan 10.30.17.pdf; Mewbourn Landscaping final v3.pdf; Mewbourn AFTEC texture and color.pdf Please add to case file for 5MJUSR17-83-542. Latest Landscape Plan for the Mewbourn Gas Plant From: Patrick Groom [mailto:PGroom@wobjlaw.com] Sent: Monday, October 30, 2017 5:36 PM To: Kim Ogle <kogle@weldgov.com> Cc: Barry, Alison E <AEBarry@dcpmidstream.com> Subject: DCP Landscape Plan/Mewbourn Kim: Attached please find DCP's revised landscape plan, incorporating responses to your previous comments. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks. PATRICK M. GROOM, ESQ. Witwer, Oldenburg, Barry & Groom, LLP 822 7th St., Ste. 760 Greeley, CO 80631 (970) 352-3161 (970) 313-4776 - Direct (970) 352-3165 - Fax 1 dcp Midstream.. Mewbourn 2 and 3 — Landscaping/Screening Plan Weld County, Colorado USR Permit No. 5MJUSR17-83-542 November 1, 2017 1. Introduction On July 17, 2017, The Weld County Board of Commissioners (the "Board") granted an amended use by special review (USR) permit allowing DCP to construct additional gas processing facilities at the DCP's Mewbourn gas processing plant, subject to certain conditions, including the submittal of a Landscaping/Screening Plan to mitigate visual impacts associated with the project. DCP was directed to consult with area property owners in development of the Plan. The following sections describe the planning process and the resulting elements of DCP's Landscaping/Screening Plan. 2. Description of Planning Process DCP held two community meetings with area property owners after the USR hearing: August 16 and September 12, 2017. At the first meeting, DCP discussed options to add 16 -foot prefabricated metal screening walls to extend the existing barrier wall on the west side of the property, and to modify existing chain -link fencing to provide additional screening on the east side of the property. DCP also proposed to add a row of trees on the west side of the 16 -ft screening wall for visual interest. Community feedback at the August 16, 2017 meeting indicated that area property owners wanted DCP to consider using alternate materials for the screening walls, as well as additional landscaping features like a berm, and to include more screening on the east side of the property. At the meeting, DCP explained that a berm along the full length of the west side of the Mewbourn facility would not be feasible due to the multiple underground pipelines that cross the site, and the overall size and shape of the site. DCP also explained that DCP would achieve the light industrial sound standards imposed by the Board through sound mitigation measures implemented inside the Mewbourn facility, and that additional sound mitigation was not needed to meet these requirements. DCP agreed to review other materials for the screening walls and to consider additional screening on the east side of the property, as well as to work with a landscape architect on the placement and selection of trees. DCP met again with the area property owners on September 12, 2017, to present DCP's proposed Plan. DCP proposed to use precast concrete walls designed to resemble stone instead of corrugated metal for the extension of the screening wall along the west side of the facility, and to modify existing chain -link fencing on the east side by inserting slats to provide a visual barrier along this side of the property, as well as on the south side of the property. DCP also proposed to use groups of evergreen trees in locations selected to line up with adjacent residences. DCP would use drip irrigation to support the vegetation. The community also presented ideas at the September 12, 2017 meeting, focusing on approaches to add additional sound mitigation on the west, north and east of the site through use of sound reduction walls similar to those used at well drilling sites, in combination with tall (25 feet +) berms, and multiple rows of "full-size" deciduous shade trees and evergreens, as well as native grasses. 3. Discussion DCP reviewed ideas presented by the area property owners at both meetings, and has incorporated certain elements to reflect such input. Some ideas proposed by the area property owners, such as the use of very tall berms and sound wall materials, are expressly intended to provide additional sound mitigation rather than visual screening. Because the Mewbourn facility covers a large parcel [sizing info], and consists of multiple structures and equipment installations, DCP proposed in its USR application to provide noise mitigation through engineering controls at the most significant noise sources rather than through external barriers, which are less effective. DCP's noise mitigation approach will meet the light industrial sound standards imposed by the Board at the USR hearing. The USR amendment granted by the Board directed DCP to implement these measures as proposed, and to develop a separate landscaping/screening plan for mitigation of visual impacts. DCP's Plan has been developed to provide such mitigation through landscaping and use of screening walls at the perimeter of the existing and proposed facility area. The following sections describe DCP's analysis of the comments received and the changes to DCP's plan made in response to such comments. a. Screening/sound walls In the September 12, 2017 meeting, the area property owners presented ideas for using sound reduction barrier walls on the full perimeter of the site. The examples shown include metal, fiberglass and PVC components, as well as rockwool or fiberglass batting to provide sound reduction. Although the purpose of the Plan is to provide visual screening, as opposed to sound mitigation, DCP has agreed to use materials that provide additional sound mitigation benefits. However, not all of the specific products presented at the meeting may be suitable for the Mewbourn site, either for reasons of durability and resistance to weather over a long period of time, because they are not cost-effective for use as a perimeter wall at a large industrial site, or because their appearance is not consistent with the County's visual standards. DCP will construct a sound wall around the west and east sides of the new facility area with a minimum height of 15 feet, as shown on the plan in Exhibit A. DCP's preliminary recommendation, subject to availability, is the SoundTec modular wall system, manufactured by AFTEC. The SoundTec system is comprised of precast concrete panels installed between either metal or concrete columns, and is available in colors and textures which can be selected to resemble a wall made from blocks of natural buff -colored sandstone. This system is designed to provide sound absorption, which will add to the existing noise mitigation features of DCP's engineering design. DCP also proposes to select the Ashlar pattern in Tan, based on its resemblance to local stone, as shown in Exhibit B. The final design and materials will depend on additional engineering analysis and commercial availability, but at a minimum the resulting sound wall will be tan or beige in color and have a non -reflective, attractive surface that resembles stone. DCP will also install opaque slats into the existing chain -link fence that runs along the east side of the property, in order to provide additional screening between the facility and the road. Although the area residents expressed a desire for additional sound walls on this side, DCP does not think that replacing its existing perimeter fencing in this area is warranted. First, DCP will achieve its sound mitigation goals by engineering controls within the plant, as previously stated. Second, DCP has limited room on this side of the facility, given the proximity of the current perimeter to CR35, as well as the location of equipment and structures on this side of the property. DCP's primary access route into the facility is located on the east and any wall would necessarily be interrupted over a significant area, thereby reducing any perceived sound mitigation effect. At this time, DCP does not plan to install a screening wall on the south side of the property, along CR38, due to the absence of any residential properties along that boundary. However, DCP may add a screening/sound barrier wall feature comparable to the one used on the west and east side of the Mewbourn 3 facilities when and to the extent warranted by future residential development in that area. b. Berm Many area property owners expressed a strong interest in the use of berms as part of the DCP design. As discussed below, there are technical limitations imposed by the size, topography and subsurface characteristics of the Mewbourn property which affect the use of berms to provide visual screening or other benefits. However, DCP has determined that an elongated berm of limited but variable height along the northwestern perimeter of the property may be used as a landscape feature to offer visual interest and provide some screening. DCP will install the berm in combination with irrigated tree plantings oriented towards the current adjacent residential properties on the northwest. Based on an analysis of the site characteristics, DCP has concluded that installation of a 25' berm along the western and eastern sides of the facility is technically infeasible and offers limited additional benefits either as a sound barrier or a visual screen, given the topography of the area and the geographic distance between area property owners from the Mewbourn plant facilities. First, the Mewbourn site is much larger than the examples offered by the area property owners in the second meeting; the Mewbourn property covers approximately 125 acres, with the western perimeter of the facility measuring nearly 4000 linear feet. From an engineering perspective, an artificial hill of the size proposed by the residents would require an enormous "footprint" and considerable internal structural support to ensure a stable landscaping feature. Even at this size, the berm would not provide the screening that area property owners expect, given the distance between their properties and the berm, and the relative elevations of the site and surrounding area. Second, DCP and other parties operate multiple pipelines that underlie the west side of the site, so that any surface structure on the west side of the property must be constructed to avoid impact to these underground facilities and to allow access for repairs and maintenance purposes. A modular wall system as proposed by DCP can be constructed of smaller components, and can be installed to avoid such interference. Third, with respect to the proposal that DCP construct such a berm on the east side of CR 35 as well as on the west side of the plant site, DCP does not own all of the property on the east side of CR35, and cannot install a berm feature along the length of this corridor as requested. As discussed below, DCP has instead proposed to plant trees along the border of the adjacent residential property east of the facility, across CR 35, in order to provide visual screening for these properties. Finally, as recognized in the noise mitigation approach approved by the Board, DCP will be taking out of service certain noise -emitting equipment located in the northern portion of the Mewbourn site, and there is little justification for adding noise mitigation features in this area as requested by the area property owners. As shown in Exhibit A, DCP has developed a landscaping design that includes an elongated berm with a base height of five feet relative to grade along the northwestern perimeter of the property. Additional height will be added in selected locations intended to provide more visual interest to the landscape. The berm will be approximately 2100 feet in length and 50 feet wide. This feature will provide more visual screening in this perimeter location than if placed closer to the Mewbourn facility, because it is closer to nearby residential properties. DCP will plant trees, shrubs and native grasses on the berm, as discussed in the following section, which will further enhance the visual benefits. As discussed in the following section, DCP will plant trees, shrubs and native grasses in certain other areas as well. c. Vegetation/Trees The area property owners proposed in the September 12 meeting that DCP install a variety of full-size shade and other deciduous trees, such as maples and elms, in combination with evergreens, shrubs and native grasses, to be located in three rows between the berms located to the west and east of the property and a sound wall. Based on input from DCP's landscape architecture consultant, as well as the site's physical characteristics, DCP does not think this proposal is feasible. First, even with irrigation, many of the species desired by the area property owners are not compatible with the site environment, let alone native to the high plains ecosystem, and would not thrive or even survive over the longer term. Second, use of full-size trees in a new planting is rarely successful, even under the best circumstances, as well as extremely costly. There are very few species of trees that are native to this area and/or that would be compatible with the site environment without irrigation. However, the pine and spruce species common in the Front Plains would be most likely to thrive and grow at this site with irrigation, and transplanting medium-sized trees is likely to be more successful than re-establishing more mature, larger ones. DCP proposes to use medium-sized evergreen trees, in several varieties chosen for compatibility with the physical environment, as well as compatible shrubs and native grasses. In DCP's design, such trees are planted on and near the northwest berm, and in three other locations chosen for their location relative to the view from nearby residential properties. DCP will plant the trees in patterns resembling natural groupings in all four locations rather than in rows. DCP will also plant larger species of native grasses or similar grasses along the eastern fence of the Mewbourn facility, adjacent to CR35, and other native grasses will be used to revegetate disturbed areas outside the plant site. A drip irrigation system will be necessary to provide adequate water and sustain the tree and shrub plantings. DCP believes this comprehensive approach will produce a sustainable landscape that is most likely to provide the visual benefits desired by the community. 4. DCP Conceptual Site Plan Exhibit A shows the conceptual site plan for the Mewbourn site, with landscaping and screening walls identified in approximate locations. V Fe to C 0 t ' S U co a) U U- O a) C O +-• N c0 L. O U U C co a) Z O O O S U (0 4-, N O U Copyright © 2017 U J w Q v a) O O O) ° U v -a O S (a rci L 4J a) L a) U, a) a) a) i -o ro U O C 2 F- N 17) E O U a) a) a) C O +-a UI Lib !Ref Usti 4c b Q C/1 U CD -O O. ii. H N H -O C O t/7 Copyright © 2017 are registered trademarks of Advanced Forming Technology (AFTEC) LLC StoneTree®, Combo -Cast'"^ and SoundTecT"' tiCri Midsttearn. Mewbourn 2 and 3 Community Participation Plan Weld County, Colorado USR Permit No. SMJUSR17-83-542 September 26, 2017 DCP is committed to developing and sustaining a Community Participation Plan that facilitates effective stakeholder communications and public information regarding the existing operations of its Mewbourn facility and its Mewbourn 3 expansion. The following described the objectives and activities that comprise DCP's Plan. Objectives DCP has identified three objectives integral to an effective community participation plan: Build and Maintain Relationships. DCP will identify and maintain a list of key stakeholder contacts to ensure inclusion and proactive outreach, and to provide a pathway for questions and concerns. Educate Stakeholders. Through regular outreach, DCP will strive to educate stakeholders about operating procedures, emergency preparedness, community benefits, and industry awareness. Provide Openness. DCP will identify various avenues through which the local community can access relevant information, and can provide comments and feedback. DCP understands that trust is founded upon strong, open and accessible relationships. Communications Activities The following activities will help DCP meet its objectives as stated above: to build relationships, educate stakeholders and provide openness about Mewbourn activities and issues. This three-part approach addresses our local community's need for information regarding our ongoing operations, and updates related to the construction of our Mewbourn 3 expansion. Neighbor Response Line: 970-378-6399 DCP has established a dedicated neighbor response line that will route during office hours to an assigned employee, with multiple forwarding options to ensure prompt response. After normal hours, voice mails left on the response line will automatically generate an email that will be directed to multiple management level personnel. Emergency calls should continue to be directed to 911. Community Town Halls: DCP has identified a schedule of town hall meetings, extending through the construction period into 2018. Town halls will be held quarterly and local stakeholder input will be sought into the effectiveness of the format. Topics of discussion may include construction updates, emergency preparedness, responding to questions and concerns about plant operations, and social opportunities to build and maintain relationships. Scheduled Town Hall Meetings: August 16, 2017 November 14, 2017 February 20, 2018 May 8, 2018 August 14, 2018 November 13, 2018 Electronic/Mobile Access DCP has implemented a social media collaboration tool through Facebook, which allows interested neighbors to subscribe for updates and to provide feedback. This approach provides the additional benefit of mobile access to ensure openness and responsiveness. Postings may include topics such as operational planned updates, construction routes, unplanned activities, schedule reminders and input regarding town hall meetings, and question and answers. DCP's Facebook site is called the DCP Midstream Mewbourn Community, and the website address is: https://www.facebook.com/groups/1783797418578056/ MEMORANDUM To: Board of County Commissioners From: Kim Ogle, Planning Services Subject: 5MJUSR17-83-542 17-83-542 Condition of Approval 1.C Landscape Plan Date: November 1, 2017 The Board of County Commissioners conditionally approved 5MJUSR17-83-0542 on July 17, 2017 for DCP Operating Company, LP for a Site Specific Development Plan and 5th Amended Use by Special Review Permit No. USR-542 for Mineral Resource Development Facilities, Oil and Gas Support and Service, Natural Gas Processing facility, and the addition of new gas processing equipment to improve capacity and efficiency of the existing plant and one (1) up to one hundred (100) feet in height secure communications tower in the A (Agricultural) Zone District. (DCP Operating Company, LP — Mewbourn Gas Plant) on July 17, 2017. Condition of Approval 1.C states "A landscaping/screening plan to mitigate visual impacts shall be submitted to the Department of Planning Services after consultation with area property owners." DCP held two (2) community meetings with area property owners after the USR hearing: August 16 and September 12, 2017. At the August meeting DCP proposed: 1. The addition of a 16 -foot prefabricated metal screening walls to extend the existing barrier wall on the west side of the property 2. To modify existing chain -link fencing to provide additional screening on the east side of the property 3. To add a row of trees on the west side of the 16 -ft screening wall for visual interest Community feedback to the DCP proposal indicated area property owners requested: 1. Using alternate materials for the screening walls 2. Adding landscaping features like a berm 3. Adding more screening on the east side of the property At the September 12, 2017 meeting DCP presented a new plan based on the area property owners suggestions. 1. To use precast concrete walls designed to resemble stone instead of corrugated metal for the extension of the screening wall along the west side of the facility. 2. To modify existing chain -link fencing on the east side by inserting matte finished aluminum slats to provide a visual barrier along this side of the property, as well as on the south side of the property 3. To use groups of evergreen trees in locations selected to line up with adjacent residences and to install a drip irrigation to support the existing and new vegetation Community feedback to the DCP proposal indicated area property owners requested: 1. Requested a review of new approaches to add additional sound mitigation on the west, north and east of the site through use of sound reduction walls similar to those used at well drilling sites 2. Adding tall (25 feet +) earth berms 3. Adding multiple rows of "full-size" deciduous shade trees and evergreens, as well as native grasses. Based on comments received from the area property owners during the August and September 2017 meetings, DCP and their landscape architect consultant developed a Landscape design that includes an elongated berm along the northwestern perimeter of the property. The berm, is approximately 2100 feet in length and 50 feet wide, planted with medium sized trees on the berm, primarily pine and spruce evergreen trees with native grasses. In concept, trees will be planted in patterns resembling natural groupings and will utilize native grasses. The Department of Planning Services reviewed the Landscape Plan for the Mewbourn Gas Plant Facility and offers the following comments: The south and east side of the facility have the greatest restrictions primarily due to the construction of the plant infrastructure and the future right-of-way associated with County Road 35. Opaque slats will be threaded into the existing chain -link fence that runs along the east side of the property, in order to provide additional screening between the facility and the road. To soften the appearance of the vertical slats, DCP will also plant larger species of native grasses or similar grasses along the eastern fence of the Mewbourn facility, adjacent to CR35. The north side of the facility has a concrete wall that contains existing equipment within the Mewbourn 1 gas plant. There are constraints here due to an emergency/ maintenance access road and the irrigation canal. In lieu of a single row of trees, that may not adequately screen the facility, it is recommended that trees be placed in a triangular configuration and utilize an upright evergreen tree in form. The west side of the facility has three design elements proposed. The elongated earth berm; a diversified palette of evergreen trees, shrubs and native grasses and a sound/ screening wall to assist in the visual and noise mitigation associated with the Mewbourn 3 gas plant. The proposed elongated lineal earth berm approximately 2100 feet in length, 50 feet width and offering an undulating form of hills, slopes and valleys with changes in the width of the berm will offer a visual aesthetic and visual interest. The trees, shrubs and native grasses planted on and in front of the berm will create interest and provide a hedgerow of mixed native plantings, including grasses that would thrive in the soil conditions, aspect, climate and the unknown subsurface encumbrances. While not graphically shown on the plan, it is also suggested that small mounds be placed in the landscape to compliment the larger undulating earth berm and provide a slight topographic change in grade to create interest. A modular sound wall system is proposed to surround the new Mewbourn Gas Plant 3. The sound wall also provides a screening component and the wall has a textured surface resembling local area stones in a natural buff color. The wall is proposed to be a minimum of 15 feet in height from grade and has been designed per the manufacturer's specification to provide sound absorption which will add to the noise mitigation features associated with the engineering plan. A suggestion is to add a vegetative component to the wall facade through the introduction of a climbing vine such as Boston ivy that would create visual interest in the fall, with their characteristic bright burgundy red leaves with hints of green and dark purple. This plant may assist in the softening to the wall and may be of additional benefit. There are two locations with medium size evergreen trees that appear to be screening a specific resident or residents. The first location is adjacent to the west property line and north of and adjacent to County Road 38. Medium-sized evergreen trees, in several varieties selected for compatibility with the physical environment, as well as compatible shrubs and native grasses are to be placed in patterns resembling natural groupings. The second location is east of the plant site, planted on an uphill slope on lands outside of the permit area. The 80 acre parcel on which the plantings are proposed are owned by DCP and the property is encumbered with several pipelines adjacent to County Road 35. The vegetative pattern here is similar to other locations and will utilize native trees, shrubs and grasses planted in patterns resembling natural groupings found along the front range. In all planted area's a drip irrigation system will be installed and maintained to provide adequate water for the long term survival of all tree, shrub and grass plantings. As stated in the applicants Landscape narrative white paper, and as delineated on the USR Map, the Mewbourn Gas Plant Landscape Plan proposes to use medium-sized evergreen trees, in several varieties chosen for compatibility with the physical environment, as well as compatible shrubs and native grasses. Changes in topography, undulating surfaces and the introduction of vegetation offering spring flowers, fall color, and vegetation with berries offers a diverse plant palette. The installation of an engineered sound wall will assist in mitigating visual and noise related concerns associated with the new plant site. NOTICE Pursuant to the zoning laws of the State of Colorado and the Weld County Code, a public hearing will be held in the Chambers of the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, Weld County Administration Building, 1150 O Street, Assembly Room, Greeley, Colorado 80631, at the time specified. If a court reporter is desired, please advise the Clerk to the Board, in writing, at least five days prior to the hearing. The cost of engaging a court reporter shall be borne by the requesting party. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if special accommodations are required in order for you to participate in this hearing, please contact the Clerk to the Board's Office at (970) 336-7215, Extension 4226, prior to the day of the hearing. The complete case file may be examined in the office of the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, Weld County Administration Building, 1150 O Street, Greeley, Colorado 80631. E -Mail messages sent to an individual Commissioner may not be included in the case file. To ensure inclusion of your E -Mail correspondence into the case file, please send a copy to egesick@co.weld.co.us. DATE: November 1, 2017 TIME: 9:00 a.m. APPLICANT: DCP Operating Company, LP 3620 W. 10th Street #410 Greeley, Colorado 80631 REQUEST: To Determine Satisfaction of Condition of Approval #1.C of 5th Amended Use by Special Review Permit, 5MJUSR17-83-542 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot A of Amended Recorded Exemption, AMRE-591, and Lot B of Corrected Recorded Exemption, CORR RE -3203, being part of the SE1/4 of Section 35, Township 4 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: North of and adjacent to CR 38, west of and adjacent to CR 35 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO DATED: October 20, 2017 Pursuant to the zoning laws of ti hearing will be held in the Chambers Colorado, Weld County Administratio Colorado 80631, at the time specified. If a court reporter is desired, ple days prior to the hearing. The cost of party. In accordance with the America required in order for you to participate? Office at (970) 336-7215, Extension 42', The complete case file may be Commissioners, Weld County Administ E -Mail messages sent to an individual ensure inclusion of your E -Mail corn egesick@co.weld.co.us. DATE: November 1, 2017 TIME: 9:00 a.m. APPLICANT: DCP Operating Company, LP 3620 W. 10th Street #410 Greeley, Colorado 80631 REQUEST: To Determine Satisfaction Special Review Permit, 5MJUSR17-83-s LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot A of Ami Corrected Recorded Exemption, COrt Township 4 North, Range 68 West of th!: LOCATION: North of and adjacent to f BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONEF WELD COUNTY, COLORADO DATED: October 20, 2017 SSV10 1S211d Q3121OS32Id co o v.) cc o O N m =W CO 0 0coXW COOW m W O LU V=a0 tv"- Ci I-= LEI 44 =7 {fl N UI M c, SI- 4t Wo_.. ;r `° w 'r o 4-, 01 V) N N M L aI a) X o -c m cc 00 Cl CO N 00 Ol .-I V) L11 VI VILf1 M e -I inin e-i Lf) Lf) 01 N 4-) VI Cr en 4--1 O N O N N O r -I O r, M Tr Tr T' Cr N V) Tr Tr Ln O O M Tt MO M N O M [f Tr N N N N en O O O O O O ‘-') l0 l0 lD l0 l0 L0 N N L0 l0 Ln N a0 Ol 01 Ol Ql I� 00 41 .-i rn m op O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 n n n o n o o o o o ,LI a --I Lry I f) e -•I Ln ci r -I LA r -I Ln A Tr Lff Ln ct N M if) crLn Ct r1 M d t13 t0 LO LO tD tD lD l0 L0 t0 l0 N Lf1 O TrO O O O O O O O O O O A N 00 N O 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 N W Lfl F- O '-^e•-,OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO 00 MUUUUUOUUUUUZOUUUUOUUUUUUUUUUUUUU— N X l— e 0 vL c 7 aJ O Q1 C 41 2 a) al 3 > = '> a1 a) = a) > '> a) > a) L- o CU a) a) a a) a) C aJ O al J cu CU O Ql w '� a w a) a) a) N O al 4, 4-, io -Ft, io CU 1) co > c0 co c0 co co co N ++ CO CO ++ CO CO > > CO `^ _ f�0 O (�O H N , Ln a1 a"' N COO N c 'c5 N Ln in Ln Ln V) , ++ N N +� N N C C N C C U 0- N CL J J LL J (DE J a J 0 N co f0 is f0 LD �- a J J C1 J J (7 co 1 CU -C O ai a) a L, X LL 00 Y co O y Z O O 0- a� O a X - f0 c co Ln Ol O M Ln tf f O M= M O en a cM LO N M Q M t7 N M N cu cc i M ct en v) U)_ U X U U U +L. U U X U co 4-' U U U LJ-I CL m OM LO m H m 0000 000 OON O< Q d OM a0 -I O_ U U ON LO 00 00 i 18435 CR 33 16311 CR 38 15716 CR 40 5230 Lakeshore Dr 17313 CR 38 18874 CR 33 16782 CR 40 17313 CR 38 16979 CR 40 17375 CR 38 O U N TS Y 0_ 0 C c J 0 _ 7 Ll C 'aJ CO C C -p c co J 41 co aJ 00E Vf 0 CO U Q. CO ` L a) COL a1 E Y z (0 E o_ " - N o 0 0 0 >, • U Ln C LL c 0 c E OD c a av, c N c Y= °) L v cc o a� co v m 411 �� o 0 t y v a cLo o o Li 'cc C L° '0 CL L0 -CO Ta ; Li Y ]L N , cc0 C N C v c a! 01 a) >. = f0 G1 c L„ •o_o 2 of coon cp c0 2 LL 10 co 0`0 ,��, -, U -o a) _ ,� _ ° 3 ca 2 3 a aJ m m L ca a coo co io -a co ca c 4L --- co _ _ = v w Q '3 U o *FL—) •� U 'CU U C CU U 0 Q C. U C ," L V aJ Z J CI U J J C J [� J C7 d' Q U J 2 U W U Z LL -CV) W N 370 17th St Eric Jacobsen it • >. CU -O V) co > cc C 3 Q a) c0 o it., CO N i U 0- L CO L -I Q V) vs in ri ,• i vs N �-I Ol 00 N l0 L0 N ei N N L0 4—I Chad Calvert a) c a, W Y aJ O = Z co Dave Kisker George Courcier v en lD 0 00 O U 5400 W 11th St, Suite C Craig Rasmuson WELD COUNTY COLORADO LAND RECORDS AFFIDAVIT OF INTERESTED LAND OWNERS SURFACE ESTATE 10/18/2017 2:34:15 PM THE UNDERSIGNED, States that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names, addresses, and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners of the property (the surface estate) within 500 feet of the property being considered. This list was compiled utilizing the records of the Weld County Assessor available on the Weld County Internet Mapping site, http://www.co.weld.co.us, and has not been modified from the original. The list compiled for the records of the Weld Cousessor was assembled within thirty days of the applications submission date. kvat 7 Property Owners Within 500 ft of Parcel # 105735400002 Signature Date Account Parcel Owner Mailing Address R4475686 105735000040 DCP MIDSTREAM LP ATTN: PROPERTY TAX DEPT 5718 WESTHEIMER RD STE 2000 HOUSTON, TX 770575774 R7325798 105735100050 BERIG LEILA BRIDGETT 16730 COUNTY ROAD 40 LA SALLE, CO 806459206 R1422402 105735200002 JOHNSON GERALD 16274 COUNTY ROAD 40 LA SALLE, CO 806459218 R8948173 105735300007 FERGE RICHARD F PO BOX 1217 PLATTEVILLE, CO 806511217 M0127203 105735300053 DECHANT TERRI R2241603 105735300053 DECHANT TERRI M0127203 105735300053 DECHANT DON 18488 COUNTY ROAD 33 LA SALLE, CO 806459208 R2241603 105735300053 DECHANT DONALD 18488 COUNTY ROAD 33 LA SALLE, CO 806459208 R1422602 105735400002 DCP MIDSTREAM LP ATTN: PROPERTY TAX DEPT 5718 WESTHEIMER RD STE 2000 HOUSTON, TX 770575774 Parcels: 18 Owner Records: 21 Page 1 of 4 WELD COUNTY COLORADO LAND RECORDS AFFIDAVIT OF INTERESTED LAND OWNERS SURFACE ESTATE 10/18/2017 2:34:15 PM THE UNDERSIGNED, States that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names, addresses, and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners of the property (the surface estate) within 500 feet of the property being considered. This list was compiled utilizing the records of the Weld County Assessor available on the Weld County Internet Mapping site, http://www.co.weld.co.us, and has not been modified from the original. The list compiled for the records of the Weld County Assessor was assembled within thirty days of the applications submission date. Property Owners Within 500 ft of Parcel # 105735400002 Signature Date Account Parcel Owner Mailing Address R1599202 105735400008 DCP MIDSTREAM LP ATTN: PROPERTY TAX DEPT 5718 WESTHEIMER RD STE 2000 HOUSTON, TX 770575774 R2241703 105735400054 MARGHEIM COLLEEN B R2241703 105735400054 MARGHEIM RICK G 18481 COUNTY ROAD 35 PLATTEVILLE, CO 806518400 R8770300 105736000021 BERIG LEILA C/O MICHAEL BUCK PO BOX 509 LA SALLE, CO 806450509 M4476386 105736000021 BERIG LEILA B 18984 COUNTY ROAD 35 LA SALLE, CO 806459321 R2330103 105736300022 PHELAN MICHAEL E 10314 COUNTY ROAD 23 FORT LUPTON, CO 806219610 R2330203 105736300023 DCP MIDSTREAM LP 3026 4TH AVE GREELEY, CO 806317422 M0253907 105736300023 FEOLA-JUNG LINDA 18230 COUNTY ROAD 35 PLATTEVILLE, CO 806518409 R3363005 121101100001 LUDWIG FAMILY FARMS LLC 18010 COUNTY ROAD 38 PLATTEVILLE, CO 806518410 Parcels: 18 Owner Records: 21 Page 2 of 4 WELD COUNTY COLORADO LAND RECORDS AFFIDAVIT OF INTERESTED LAND OWNERS SURFACE ESTATE 10/18/2017 2:34:15 PM THE UNDERSIGNED, States that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names, addresses, and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners of the property (the surface estate) within 500 feet of the property being considered. This list was compiled utilizing the records of the Weld County Assessor available on the Weld County Internet Mapping site, http://www.co.weld.co.us, and has not been modified from the original. The list compiled for the records of the Weld County Assessor was assembled within thirty days of the applications submission date. Property Owners Within 500 ft of Parcel # 105735400002 Signature Date Account Parcel Owner Mailing Address R6786682 121102100003 ANADARKO E & P COMPANY LP C/O TRAVIS HOLLAND -PROPERTY TAX PO BOX 173779 DENVER, CO 802173779 R6786683 121102100004 ANADARKO E & P COMPANY LP C/O TRAVIS HOLLAND -PROPERTY TAX PO BOX 173779 DENVER, CO 802173779 M4842086 121102100004 CONAGRA FOODS PACKAGED FOODS CO INC C/O BUTTERBALL LLC 501 N OAK FOREST RD GOLDSBORO, NC 275348341 Parcels: 18 Owner Records: 21 Page 3 of 4 WELD COUNTY COLORADO LAND RECORDS AFFIDAVIT OF INTERESTED LAND OWNERS SURFACE ESTATE 10/18/2017 2:34:15 PM THE UNDERSIGNED, States that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names, addresses, and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners of the property (the surface estate) within 500 feet of the property being considered. This list was compiled utilizing the records of the Weld County Assessor available on the Weld County Internet Mapping site, http://www.co.weld.co.us, and has not been modified from the original. The list compiled for the records of the Weld County Assessor was assembled within thirty days of the applications submission date. Property Owners Within 500 ft of Parcel # 105735400002 Signature Date Parcels: 18 Owner Records: 21 Page 4 of 4 ‘!C a, 0Q 9 go V� GO 1 Oo dv od A ,% Q N c� "�1 V Q V e5 Co c ' c� CITY W) I ''ADDRESS m 117313 ex 38� Al � � Q— cn M N� w o , , --t, --- EMAIL •ti 4 k c.E 4402'USw®SUanbity.i9Avd m 3 Jiy�-�a;, 3 ��v E1 ;, `' v r i %. — c6- c ® M N ,n v� --x ) , :'. ....; \P r 7, , ,.,I -, if ....c 4,11 ,r., ci- ,,,, ,.. -c- ..,,,,, (...) s- .4 d-- ,. § 72 -. Z Z ...ac d w --s' r O, 0 4• NAME - PLEASE PRI_NT LEGIBLY, < qo .L > °.-\ ---(‘,4 —.t � . sd Z z 44 —C '/ d � l. 71 L C) r � /C e , -›.....'- cl, 1 &I •,,__14 3'-- .__ .1 --'( C . _ ‘ 2 4I`'� .-r :-Zzi -,.. ' CTS J 2 e" -----<A....2 S c4Z i �'jc� E. _.cam �� \ \. • 7A111 1'`1 -Z,!' "Zc 0 (\,` b Q‘ .c \P) �-- E H©.'00 \.-0 e O O 0 I CITY .‘. _1(6,....ss.1 4- ‘c- 4 \.5 ,‘I(,z N 4- ')I I ADDRESS L. c. 1.-14 ' �,-4, "G <T- 1 — V v1 ,L__ coo i^ V rNM , Q i 3 J '. Et ' \ cl ~� ��''�-i, ii \,,(, (f\ " VD 3, EMAIL .I d .Cf) i-'s dl - ,,_-) ' 4 1 `‘.. i. 'kJ i "i j 's‘ 4 .L Y1)) -:."- 'TAME PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY 77A - Itj -t -‹P-.-,, a ) .4- ie. -' o 1. i --Z- 1\,,i ,iii `off; :si v . \ -••4. r -- A v •,- • \ - -- a ---1(E. .4 -i ,..,__,..-',... LA,. N J Q z a o N z� W W 0 a rV"Nt�j �4 EP N ej CITY I q.-', -2 ADDRESS ,z, r., ii to „4.. ,-; i7:: 3k cl t) ,-.- ,,„ vl * 3 9 0 r EMAIL 5 Ro P i Cl f to V 6 NI -WE -- PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY C.)6 P° EXHIBIT INVENTORY CONTROL SHEET Case 5MJUSR17-83-542 — DCP OPERATING COMPANY, LP (MEWBOURN) Exhibit Submitted By Surrounding Property A. Owners B. Eric Ewing C. Rocky Rissler D. Eric Ewing E. Terri Dechant Description PowerPoint Presentation, dated 10/30/2017 Email re: Lacking Landscaping Plan, dated 10/9/2017 PowerPoint Presentation and photos, dated 9/21/2017 Letter re: Addendum #1 DCP Mewbourn Landscape and screening, dated October 30, 2017 Email re: Notice for USR17-0050, dated October 30, 2017 DCP Operating F. Company G. Planning Services H. Rocky Rissler I. Hoshiko Land, LLC Randy and Cindy J. Clement K. Rich Hartness L. Cindy Clement Email re: DCP Landscape Proposal, dated November 3, M. Terriand Don Dechant 2017 Rick Krumpeck, Fred Krumpeck and Rockelle N. Rissler Presentation for DCP Operating Company, LP, dated O. Neighbors November 6, 2017 PowerPoint Presentation, dated October 31, 2017 PowerPoint Presentation, dated October 31, 2017 Three (3) page list of signatures proposing DCP Operating Company, LP, dated November 1, 2017 Letter of Concern for weed management DCP Midstream, dated November 2, 2017 Email re: proposed landscape plan from DCP Operating, LP, dated November 3, 2017 Email re: Estimated views of 5 and 10 foot berms, dated November 3, 2017 Email re: Pictures of Sound wall samples, dated November 3, 2017 Email of Concern, dated November 4, 2017 P. Q. R. S. T. U. V. W. 2017-3769 EXHIBIT b CoA z A 4' sMj ttse 17- &3 -SV 2 10/30/2017 The Neighbors would like to recognize the Commissioners and DCP... The Neighbors would like to recognize the Commissioners and DCP... Public meetings. These are good things and the Neighbors would like to acknowledge DCP's efforts. 1 10/30/2017 The Neighbors would like to recognize the Commissioners and DCP... Public meetings. DCP asked for detailed recommendations. These are good thinqs and the Neighbors would like to acknowledge-DCP's efforts. The Neighbors would like to recognize the Commissioners and DCP... Public meetings. DCP asked for detailed recommendations. DCP commitments. 2 10/30/2017 The Neighbors would like to recognize the Commissioners and DCP... Public meetings. DCP asked for detailed recommendations. DCP commitments. • Downcast lighting. • Turning lights off when possible (motion activated). • Limiting noisy nighttime maintenance. • Replacing warning sirens with lights at night. The Neighbors would like to recognize the Commissioners and DCP... Public meetings. DCP asked for detailed recommendations. DCP commitments. • Downcast lighting. • Turning lights off when possible (motion activated). • Limiting noisy nighttime maintenance. • Replacing warning sirens with lights at night. • Road dust• DesigHated & enforced contractor route. Road control. control. 3 10/30/2017 Neighbors and DCP remain far apart on major elements of the plan. Neighbors and DCP remain far apart on major elements of the plan. 1. Significant solutions proposed by DCP are not effective. 4 10/30/2017 Neighbors and DCP remain far apart on major elements of the plan. 1. Significant solutions proposed by DCP are not effective. 2. Neighbors have a might to effective mitigation. Significant solutions proposed by DCP are not effective. 5 10/30/2017 Chain link with slats Does this screen sight/sound effectively? II 7 I • . ......M..A 10/30/2017 DCP 5' Berm Would this screen sight/sound effectively? MEWBOURN 111 MEWBOURN IAND II 11 10/30/2017 Trees integrate with the natural surroundings and help mitigate appearance Trees integrate with the natural surroundings and help mitigate appearance 12 10/30/2017 13 10/30/2017 Larger berm (hill), farther from source of noise Does this screen sound effectively? No. Example of an effective sound barrier #- /VOT# C E Tk1ACK H IG, Hp -..5 - EST1 A A 1 E 1SC !' 1 AT 6' - GOES ,Igcu&JD PER1METC ? EvE N Tv 14 10/30/2017 Example of an effective sound barrier r Mari C E- TRUCK H E I G, h ►`.S -- Es i t n.,ti t t Dti F, F AT 6 1 — C10ES tt&.oukiD t'"e. Rt►' ErEt EvE N Tc 1) Substantial absorptive barrier 2) Close to source 3) Taller than source Example of an effective sound barrier 15 10/30/2017 Video by eNoise Control https://www.youtube.comiwatch?v=D8gXhNsiBJIMeature=youtu.be 16 10/30/2017 Existing Mewbourn 2 17 10/30/2017 Existing Mewbourn 2 New Mewbourn 3 18 10/30/2017 Soundwall is short and far from sources of noise. New Mewbourn 3 satAiimvii DCP 15' Soundwall (1) Existing Mewbourn 2 Does this screen noise effectively? Soundwall is short and far from sources of noise. New Mewbourn 3 19 10/30/2017 Section Summary Chain link fence with slats. 5 foot berm. Single row of trees. Water's 15 foot soundwall far from noise. Significant solutions authorized by DCP are not effective. Better understanding DCP's point of view. 20 10/30/2017 21 10/30/2017 Better understanding DCP's point of view. 22 10/30/2017 • Wholesale Propane Terminals NGL Pipelines — intrastate Pipelines Gathering Areas Better understanding DCP's point of view. There is no apparent mitigation at any of these facilities. 23 10/30/2017 Neighbors have a right to effective mitigation. 27 Properties with Homes Close to DCP: All homes present before DCP purchased large site 24 10/30/2017 26 10/30/2017 Why was Mewbourn a Use by Special Review in 2008? WELD CCUN ft Sec. 23-2-200. - Intent and applicability. A. than the Uses Allowed by Right, in a particular zone district Therefore, Uses by Special Review require additional consideration to ensure that they are established and operated in a manner that is compatible with existing and planned land USES in the NEIGHBORHOOD. The additional consideration or regulation of Uses by Special Review, and the application to a Use by Special Review of Performance, Design and Operations Standards listed both herein and for applicable USES from any zone district, are designed to protect and promote the health, safety, convenience and general welfare of the present and future residents of the COUNTY. Why was Mewbourn a Use by Special Review in 2008? WELD CO U. N lY VerIa special use permit Sec. 23-2-200. - Intent and applicability. Uses by Special Review are USES which have been determined to be more intense or to have a potentially greater impact than the Uses Allowed by Right in a particular zone district. Therefore, Uses by Special Review require additional consideration to ensure that they are established and operated in a manner that is compatible with existing and planned land USES in the NEIGHBORHOOD. The additional consideration or regulation of Uses by Special Review, and the application to a Use by Special Review of Performance, Design and Operations Standards listed both herein and for applicable USES from any zone district are designed • heath safety; t onverilence and genera: welfare of the 27 10/30/2017 Why was Mewbourn a Use by Special Review in 2008? WEJD, CaL:i TY Sec. 23-2-200. - Intent and applicability. A. Uses by Special Review are USES which have been determined to be more intense or to have a potentially greater impact than the Uses Allowed by Right in a particular zone district. Therefore, rr ,/ R •:rdet, r.. +'• r i � 1 t .t� ell i. �!r � !r rrQ1..%.IfVriIY rer Ar/ iC /i a r iA%1Aj! i t��lL Ili. r. r�/i/ f�,?�1 ,!f°+// r/�j,/l�rr/l '% tr �r ! f ��1, tC /, / %I F I .� et j . 'r�"'�"' �.SK.°�'J:J�� 1a �r/ s'vt�`�/f,R'` i'R* 'd10 /#/,r+ i �� }gyp/.e./e / s�-,/ / !� /�1�/fj/�►(�i�Yw t /�j/j �/ j��jr�r/ �jlr` � rr��ilrf�r/.l�/t'�^ .I..1*(Per;et4 t/. ^ wr /,1/1' �/ . %d�!/" 'i�lr.� �� ° 1 i yf ril:.;!1: J �J'/rI i /� I• ��. • A �� j� � !' fj+'� � � ,1,�ljf/pl �//:/, /� r�1.' s f � $ ,t� .. / �i ,at f . ��.r•/ �' . kitg�.l i� f�/ �leirO�iFir �:��f `/L;I�140<1,. :''.�f �1� 1.+i` lar741 `��1 .ettid `.I,df7,+afJ.a/,!F�giOl �}'� ,/.X'JaJ.�'.�`s,Fel The additional consideration or regulation of Uses by Special Review, and the application to a Use by Special Review of Performance. Design and Operations Standards listed both herein and for applicable USES from any zone district, are designed to protect and promote the health, safety, convenience and general welfare of the present and future residents of the COUNTY. To the Neighbors, an approved Use by Special Review means 2 things... 1) The requestor is aware that their activity causes undesirable impacts on residents. 2) The requestor promises to take care of it. 28 10/30/2017 Section Summary The Neighbors were already here. Uses by Special Review. Neighbors have a right to effective mitigation. 29 10/30/2017 30 10/30/2017 31 10/30/2017 Noise. 32 10/30/2017 ••••oVerizon LTE 10:20 PM 1 y L=J• Noise measurement report Date: 10/10/17, 9:57 PM Operator Place: M e a su re m en t results Measurement time (hh:mm:ss) LAeq LCpeak Max, level 00:00:15 75.5 dB 113.2 dB 85,6 dB Noise. 33 10/30/2017 Alot of flaring and loud noise tonight. I can hear it over my TV. Any word to why? IL 34 10/30/2017 Emissions. Emissions. 35 10/30/2017 Emissions. HAS SUCCESSY1%LI.Y COMPLETED TIM FOLLOWING REQUIREMEN fS FOR CERTIFICATION. ATTENDING OUR TRAINING COURSE. PASSING THE REQUIRED EXAMS. AND SUBMITTING A FIELD ASsiGNMF.NT. tit CRiittite%tin% RI!it WA! Ottntili tt Emissions. Earthworks Certified FLIR of entire plant showing exhaust and emissions. Electric compressors would eliminate the exhaust. Attached and here is a link on youtube: https://youtu.be/4yF3nr cPC4 EARTHWORKS earthworksaction.org FLIR video by ITC certified Optical Gas Imaging Thermographer Using FLIR GF 320 camera 36 10/30/2017 37 10/30/2017 38 10/30/2017 39 10/30/2017 Section Summary Current plant design/operation not compatible with neighborhood. If plant doubles in size, issues will increase. 40 10/30/2017 What did the Neighbors propose to DCP? Our Recommendation Walls - sound reduction otion: AIL Soundwalls Minimum of 28' high Berm with trees & irrigation Native trees & grass with irrigation To be maintained As referenced in the Map Layout slide 41 10/30/2017 Options - berm with trees & irrication I larmony Gardens ► 3 Rows of trees 16 trees per 100' Full Size Evergreen tree: Colorado Spruce, Austrian Pine, Ponderosa Pine Multi Stem Tree: D. Canada Red Cherry, Amor Maple, Tatarian Maple Full Size Shade Tree: Princeton Elm, Hackberry, Bar Oak k Sensation Maple 0 full Slit Via. tree: Princeton E an, Her (berry, air Oak, ¶ematiO + Maple 0 (cor Sound wall examples. 42 10/30/2017 Conclusion DCP is not ready to expand at the Mewbourn location in the manner currently proposed. • Significant solutions proposed by DCP are not effective. • Neighbors have a right to effective mitigation. • Incompatibility with neighborhood, and excessive operational problems, would be increased. Neighbors' request of the Commissioners 43 10/30/2017 Neighbors' request of the Commissioners Until DCP proposes mitigations that will effectively prevent excessive impacts from spilling over onto the neighborhood, Neighbors' request of the Commissioners Until DCP proposes mitigations that will effectively prevent excessive impacts from spilling over onto the neighborhood, the Neighbors ask the Commissioners to not approve further steps in the DCP Mewbourn plant expansion. 44 10/30/2017 Supplemental Material Account Information Account Parcel R8918400 105736000019 Legal Space Account Type Residential PT E2SW4 36-4-66 LOT A REG EXEMPT RE -2753 K 29R) Tax Year Buildmgs Actual Va 2017 2 Subdivision Block Lot Land Economic Area Property Address 17375 COUNTY ROAD 38 Property City WELD Zip 6207 GREELEY Section 36 Tow 04 Owners) Account Parcel R8918400 105736000019 Space Account Type Tax Year Buildings Actual Va Residential 2017 2 Account Owner Name R8918400 SHERMAN OCHELL ANN R8918400 SHERMAN COTT CAROLL Address 17375 COUNTY ROAD 38 PLATTEVILLE CO 806518406 45 10/30/2017 Account Information Account Parcel RA0253907 105736300023 Legal IMPS ONLY PT W2SW4 36 466 LOT B RECORDED EXEMPTION RE -3486 Tax Year Buildings Actual Wk. 2017 1 Subdivision Block Property Address 18230 35TH CR Lot Land Economic Area Property City WELD Section 36 Township 04 Owner(s) Account Parcel M0253907 105736300023 Space Account Type Tax Year Buildings Actual Value Residential 2017 1 Account re Owner Name` M0253907 FEOLA-JUNG LINDA Address 18230 COUNTY ROAD 35 PLATTEVILLE. CO 806518409 Account Parcel R0015693 105735000043 Legal Space / Account Type \ Tax Year Buildings Actual Valui Agricultural / 2017 4 17257-B PT NW4 35 4 66 LYING S OF S LN EVANS #2 DITCH (.08R) Subdivision Block Property Address Lot Land Economic Area 6207 GREELEY Property City Zip Section Towns 18520 COUNTY ROAD 33 WELD 35 04 Owner(5) Account Parcel R0015693 105735000043 Account R0015693 R0015693 Space Account Type Tax Year Buildings Actual Vatu4 Agricultural 2017 4 Owner Name Address CLEMENT - ANDY L 18520 COUNTY ROAD 33 LA SALLE CO 806459208 CLEMENT ' INDY R 46 10/30/2017 Weld County, Colorado • C . • CHAPTER 23 - Zoning . ARTICLE '1- Procedures... Division 4 . Uses by Spec... • Sec 23-2-230 - Duties of... VIPs DH JUN 20.2017 (CURRENT) e CHAPTER 23 - Zoning IS ARTICLE I - General Provisions S ARTICLE II - Procedures and Permits U Division 1 - Amendments to Zoning Map is Division 2 - Amendments to Chapter Text IN Division 3 - Site Plan Review i Division 4 - Uses by Special Review Sec. 23-2-200. - Intent and applicability. % A. Uses by Special Review are USES which have been determined to be more intense or to have a potentially greater impact than the Uses Allowed by Right in a particular zone district. Therefore, Uses by Special Review require additional consideration to ensure that they are established and operated in a manner that is compatible with existing and planned land USES in the NEIGHBORHOOD. The additional consideration or regulation of Uses by Special Review, and the application to a Use by Special Review of Performance, Design and Operations Standards listed both herein and for applicable USES from any zone district, are designed to protect and promote the health, safety, convenience and general welfare of the present and future residents of the COUNTY. I 14&. siOtiikokootwiti•Da•ns et (T; a e 4 1 IJroiA ._Li I� -Cr . "• I r., • • • M (f F •4H — .c-*. - 4ij^ 1 •' • :-.111•4443 4MUSR16-83-542 k •f6t- t; U �k . Sri -v( i ( ir • • • f'b • • I • Turn- n.:4411.1,1t ;1i 1::ArSn:! .. . y• •a+.•.. 4=4.44.4•••••••••••••4S4,. • *.>_••• Sr d{ ataM•••. Y1 swoons .•M fl y. .. ..C, WS OS •s 1•• N• • ••a aft. •• • • •- •_ 1(11••.:. f 1- • (t :•.r- ••• • • ..n ••• • •I • ••• • WIO • M j. w •w•. OP CS •n -• s- In �i a . 1 lei l 1112 -Y - •t• M ;It • -Ili ••• l r•(q 1 R/ W. C,. R. 35 tir 5. H, •• 011•• I- O .• -•-Y ..w. -._ ..` - --0-^ • •.... -. �.. ..._ .- w - SYlr,r -Y• ..•—Senn W. v Se VS S.• —r w• —S. SIN N•. • _a— s — V�•..•»I MC 4— }C_. Vas•- •s C tM — .N =PO IS 4. oftiolie A 1,13? :U('HSl C'UWSW3U g etf0.1RN 642 P2aR- 001001 -t• -S•0 aektIa: •M•IICtsnt? • t0,.py13J•ry +.w% ;IS1AS1 ••• .M %YCi M Y••. '"'' '‘W •4C- err en a 47 10/30/2017 thatibisean 4M USR 16-83-542 ggJWMeraT LtQt?W • C-txa WM 'Cai11Cs'atf ztUtWs 'MI,r Mat Mt 1 :t10R :aka •t 1$ •.Olt M. -alt Mat 'tMMKO* •Ilk 'ala COW ac -oaf el I .c W1fl • flu '_Yfa Y-(1111 Mn YMat•&a 14iYIa Tw MI It aC--con till lJ/ae1X1 l ,.w n lath M-mn MIT 4111144110 t'M•at.1t4 ' :DiCCP .111 311IWA13%.* Wet 14 tale W.. (S WORM -YaflYJP' waif' '4a -Ile i9 .C MOl 1'i'lf)la :110M1'44S M 180 cam* <-'a' Winn +MIS walk :Musa p *11 'ilAltf ZCA7'II .A100•a i7 -walk • WM MOON :a0 'I_ :A1aO K- 47! MCC rlil,aa rweallAt nit aC..Mt! Inn xoia :1i In It e-Ot3aM{ii'≥ 'I l (el n:It r•.asa MAP .:•,a'eirm a t 'I -II W. WO *SAW ttit'R.YX4 M:el. i. 1]t {{.Nett CAI ;tYWT.t}0 •k • 1. 1k ♦' 'V W'y y cA04Vp M •J tn. • 1551 tw ate 's r. -0fa ,IY t 1 t OA Win, Cif CtW7 .1CV a I J1: u. tt) nal ow M •i c t 4 !l) sett w -f! :A *1S :-a8)) Ali: 44 WIlrerii au 'a0 ens al.t' 'at zat+t»lr ill 'W ^_-19A elate 017 Catty " Slit tea • AI 11.1.1a '/t 'JJIt•ttOM$ -a. CO 12, tM:IKMt :Fat: Olio 4Ctt .al 1Ml . 7L tiMt -:IO SYarACS 'at WS Mi (aaitk 'ld Allearcafir cal WO - 040 at •Xarlanrr ::u Li' t: +v MIS tt]t ' naa p :s - t -atle fiat "tan :MMI : OM air 't NICAVOMfr'w -4I 1 kill fl tai lfsta"•Y ✓ dry all 9t Me' seed•'. • ..ar •a Ot Nat! Yksaa'ts • 43411 ••halal- Y•t. now°. -*fa qt- WON 4f rrc NMI . calk : -slw ri.yqu. xG *AK ri IM :IIMii!blat •._!430'71tU4 C:it :taw: an 'a MAI AS .Hest ._IC ;.slat. aa• .:AS man :i aralla • atla :'ff vt d.1.' i►Mt4.10 f M)) 'IMI It• .Y:. •1311 • -'a ::!K n 111- 1''s, i ,Y.4 4- 4A Wee flftV* 3, t -a44S {•last 04% dm 4Mar t. alt* Ml! LIMY ''M'. A' -414wf 4. 4913 tit tm fre ,' 1tT•.A f art 444P14 woe eels M oee%ire =at:-[rf u- ed. :v aM MOM 404 I1f:MA•f •:R: '••\ SIP OP GPO; fralaa l• Me 'n mein S. Y as M.Jaa)l 44us •Y.t .4 r' a all etft IN tilt wa it •• •• eA *MS Warn •✓# :• M. M •• • -M tail• *CIV0 MMr. • Km aa.r• :xaa'Ml'Kt -,vm -.a .,.M' • SW M1 ItW)V1 'W'1•")• -af • .tI •-.'u' •x f4 :ft* was' •...fJM yp .:aftl•[.'1 :►MJII ratios • '21MI writ* !MIN • TWO -'l w Mt.' $, 1st • OW) ACC 'attaf % Ja -)I Tai ne. • !Wan 4Ce "SIAS '*.y: .%%O.I 444 ••l - M '•e, a OIt Al SMwaw I M. a2TM1 PM --470 PiPIMM'M r•LAOIi arp:i7 cc* 11a llteai<r em oft WS(MO tat 92.7)6 MI t ? efill & S't44031 ' Mt :1 ;an earl i111/a MAIM COMM? 1!0;1 :1 -JIM Kitt -*AMO C O,. LMsatt' it a1 aroma :004{151} UMW '.;.Kla•:ldleAll jT iti 'swa AWSIM#M cleatirr cilterll PCP '#U. 'OaMYek (Mati•P '•1UY.'allesu •:1 a. WAWA t71PItmct flint £IM%-'4IC,. vT WO efts CiMM010 i1p/l:i'MTf Al, MOO Itne ia.MAT t- 19MM tern It.-; Mane ant acoc IEt SW tls . to-nH7 &S/71W Sfl real A-01tA IU.S ;CMiCnat Olin Maim III 4 ese3 Si' iOMtltMaa fain an fn Ia-a-se all! WOaI'>ZLIa .Batt et -asr I/ -OS! flea <pOtifaO' (S 01 -Se It- lal MI01/ 4:Mtti1lif •halm 5Mb 'MI :a -n) al'4a( ..X.WW!R$ non %Vol AM k-iaf0 54.1100.11 Ml) flat Musa imam a31[ ran '4a TI -1110 4''S Men Sri IS i-)]1a 1i9Mt •7)tt— uw a Mal Alf M -1•Qj aa631MA11v1 Mt WIl11ii9Ot $M*I wa s -WC 10ali4OMI C'IX]7MMt HIMlame. It! :we a- tA. . tlx flC MI401'Matlai t -0170 ItI! 01► rte vs ua011 bMalet -41'.0 tin sae 8{t ITC •J(fl* 4AOMta n!a0 Ma' -SA 'NI tam SWIM WSW •J'!!o. sit. on SC :*wT tut Sai thus; •N.t ili 4,fv :SWAN -7•E ea 4'a.x -a WS el S.4. 41 JIf tat• S I•M'al !»r O+M WM :104M. !MM i's'1W 4f:I 4,7 7!11.1 ♦ _ 2111 ,aMlMate swami t N1f MV fG s L :Alan a! rs ..a4 M0 *W44 e :Mk ;TAY FS M.:lase J'VA e• a ens*, • 1• err CO a N11? • at fee Mt IWO tJ)f*Vill • "41 list 'VW CM •770.{!1 • Cr tit afC•telnt MESS '.MAP • 4 Ytr1.mm71C Ifitr.! -7317. . 4 tralltMs ,a9 'i :a(l..J • a4 MOW :*-a Gal* • It: lOW2 041 Wen ae as olit awe rel atra •y ofI St d7MMrSf01 • .•w .sal xaalla • Ill•:lt 0424INais : t • JY I.kI ttfM,tl4) ' •:JJ WfWi .ale • 11::• a►•. l0['71/aJC1t.'t 9s •Wat1)FP ' Ii' Rat •7d It* • -)11 ,11UCAYa Cliillll •try, '11 rrv'tatay wG a au •a air 1a6 •eft€ naiad we Yf •- )4Sfl4 Z t. WO 1 •t' ♦ r4af • — -Cl :M KATI • •'t S C1 t) 4410 • 4r;t02.401 alt@ U asiao •A.Ha•. • ••• Alit 11N0 • s SC • -6.3 SOD 1•04 -OP RIM Air • 41.3 S C -sm RM . -•'w NOM AS AM tw,lat MSC 4 a& oaten • ;Cr 4 AAtt) 8 WOUCT An*, 'ao1R e aft -i nn WM AP flat • •.- ..fa .elms• owe 'a. 'J} it Tai • Al CI *SUM' • PO WW1 Wan MC a • to an in 'till WM . '- at.:n nlftA • . . •se a.. of n • - on nal/ Yes, •st: • .. : ewe MU WC • 23 Ada al war la. • -4:•. w1Mt)tal014 400 • t:n• Mil 1M sat vat • •.1: 95 ,CUt ttm) . Ian ;n! •_ .T1µ4[ •.'•.sate ... A XmrIcor ., • t sal a -a • 4- Si; UM -:k MP 'as •>. alts Mt 'W • .. My It01aa :•y. • A rn an f -•a -, Ws Sn r.SW • 4M .tr ti Ha. aMl - we Mr CS 'MIS. iQ 11f..•19 :JIM 'L} all MSS ett •.A7• 'ilit •:- fFs: IC t9aAa7 ••. ta*Otani ale •"- a-olars as m9M4' 71 4:I:• tine*'" 442 :41flare IWO WO •u Or IWTI.MA•r .rettaj!•T* •4! .4 wawa; lam n vita • -W•a 14 na .ts{ :1 • CIO MIf6 C:MO04V) s -t110 C 2arce rlit -wt't 7141 w?tG i ettt • an •Mir h -O n% Seal '4I'SA4# '-14%3 4M Nil "'UM, •%.aaaa tun caa s_JIS alaft rift • 434 •.151{11 mist It 'NW .1-1133 tG aaf/1* P •taf J -143$ 'll MR/dila •ta • *Wall Cn6 *S :a WA). t"' "at CSC 'WM SC:Ot. 1.•fap•l. J 'it IitaMn•its a-!3„ !t4 aOaOltta MO 9!M r, 1431IIIIC0KAI Met a Its m a li tteots M M wor '-r4 M to alt. r5% t• TO TO S SW mit eq MIS mialatw a kmm• t- I 1 ':ouwry. CO{ARARO MLIMOURl. Ceti Pier allti>Mtf St AC se MSS •lla'1l Y a teem nat•l !M _ a *—'1l f-Uat JI t��]t a)l r1' I�_It{ M .•—MME itt ithi[i aRla.l %r.'•�MM L w�•s.xrrrw w �;fY404 �Fr' w P'G -t if ens M ,f ki; 'i r• a-we-cs.fl' -am r t- i• r. r u w ri. 'Inn! tr. • sk seta q7K A .I 48 Kim Oe From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Kim Ogle Monday, October 9, 2017 11:33 AM Kim Ogle FW: DCP Update: Landscape Plan is Still Lacking & State Regulation Violations 17045 DCP Midstream_Concept-11 x17Exhibit_9-5-17.jpg; 2017 RPT.pdf EXHIBIT b COA 5' t4st17-Y3-sqz From: Eric Ewing [mailto:ewinghr@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2017 9:11 AM To: Tom Parko Jr. <tparko@weldgov.com> Cc: Kim Ogle <kogle@weldgov.com> Subject: DCP Update: Landscape Plan is Still Lacking & State Regulation Violations Mr. Parko, Landscape Plan Not Good Enough DCP's landscape plan still lacks the noise screen wall that you required at the beginning of the hearing process. Vinyl strips in the chain link fence and some trees is not good enough. I've also asked for a drawing that shows the plant from my perspective and the little bubble showing a tree or two really isn't adequate. State Regulation Violations (Alleged) I've also been working with the Air Pollution Control Division at the State. We are continuing to drill down to the details and it appears that DCP will not be able to meet the affirmative defense for the excessive pollution. The rules they have violated are the foundation for providing a safe operation. If you have any questions, please let me know. Sincerely, Eric 1 COLORADO Department of Public Health & Environment AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DIVISION COMPLIANCE ADVISORY CASE NO. 2017-75 AIRS NO. 123/0090 INSPECTION DATE: Sept. 23, 2016 U.S. CERTIFIED MAIL NO. 7016 2710 0000 3004 2517 MAILING DATE: July 5, 2017 SOURCE CONTACT: Patricia Grajeda de Babb IN THE MATTER OF DCP Midstream, LP This Compliance Advisory provides format notice, pursuant to § 25-7-115(2), C.R.S., of alleged violations or noncompliance discovered during the Air Pollution Control Division's ("Division") inspection and/or review of records related to DCP's Facility identified below. The Division is commencing this action because it has cause to believe that the compliance issues identified below may constitute violations of the Colorado Air Pollution Prevention and Control Act ("the Act") and its implementing regulations. Please be aware that you are responsible for complying with applicable State air pollution requirements and that there are substantial penalties for failing to do so. Pursuant to the enforcement authority provided the Division by § 25-7-115, C.R.S., any person who violates the Act, its implementing regulations or any permit issued thereunder may be issued an order for compliance that can include permit revocation and assessment of penalties of up to $15,000 per day of such violation in accordance with § 25-7-122, C.R.S. The issuance of this Compliance Advisory does not in any way limit or preclude the Division from pursuing additional enforcement options concerning this inspection/review. Also, this Compliance Advisory does not constitute a bar to enforcement action for violations not specifically addressed in this Compliance Advisory. Failure to respond to this Compliance Advisory by the date indicated at the end of this Compliance Advisory may be considered by the Division in the subsequent COLORADO Air Pollution Control Division enforcement action and the assessment of penalties. Furthermore, the Division's enforcement process contemplates a full and final resolution of the compliance issues herein addressed, and those that may result from further review, in a timely manner. If at any time throughout the process of reaching such a resolution the Division determines that the Parties cannot agree to the dispositive facts, compliance requirements and/or penalty assessments (if any) associated with this Compliance Advisory, or a resultant enforcement action, the Division may exercise its full enforcement authority allowed under the law. DCP Midstream, LP (."DCP") owns and operates the Mewbourn Natural Gas Processing Plant I cated in 35409 Weld County Road 18 in Weld County, Colorado ("Facility"). The Facility and the following equipment are subject to the terms and conditions of Colorado Air Quality Control Statutes; Colorado Air Quality Control Commission ("AQCC") Regulations; and the Compliance Order on Consent in Case No. 2015-073, effective June 21, 2016 ("COC"), entered into between the Division and DCP. The following equipment is subject to Permit Number 09WE1136, Issuance 2, issued to DCP on June 28, 2012 ("Permit Number 09WE1136 Issuance 2"): AIRS Point FdC1��ty Equipment ID Point Description 101 C-211 Caterpillar, Model G379NA, SN: 72B641, 330 HP RICE 102 C-167 Waukesha, Model L7044GSI, SN: C13852-1, 1,680 HP RICE 103 C-179 Waukesha, Model L7042GSI, SN: 240410, 1,478 HP RICE 104 C-129 Waukesha, Model L7042 GU, SN: 286822, 896 HP RICE 105 C-134 Waukesha, Model L7042GU, SN: 285300, 896 HP RICE 106 C-130 Waukesha, Model L7042GSi, SN: 339839, 1,478 HP RICE 107 C-131 Waukesha, Model L7042GSI, SN: 397541, 1,478 HP RICE 108 F017 Facility Equipment Leaks 109 LO Condensate loadout 110 TANKS Four (4) tanks for storage of stabilized natural gas condensate 111 C0170 Solar, turbine Model Taurus 60, SN: TC10559, natural gas fired combustion 112 C0180 Solar, turbine Model Taurus 60, SN: TC10560, natural gas fired combustion COLORADO Aft Pollution Control Division AIRS Point Equipment Facility ID Point Description P 113 C250 Caterpillar, Model G3608TALE, SN: BEN00563, 2,370 HP RICE 114 C251 Caterpillar, Model G3608TALE, SN: BEN00565, 2,370 HP RICE 115 C252 Caterpillar, Model G3608TALE, SN: BEN00567, 2,370 HP RICE 116 C253 Caterpillar, Model G3608TALE, SN: BENOO572, 2,370 HP RICE 117 C254 Caterpillar, Model G3608TALE, SN: BEN00571, 2,370 HP RICE 118 G1650 Solar, turbine Model Taurus 70, SN: TG09548, natural gas fired combustion 119 G1670 Solar, turbine Model Taurus 70, SN: TG09549, natural gas fired combustion 120 AM001 Precision sweetening Pipe &t Vessel, system LLC, Model T502, SN: 2381-9089 Natural gas 121 H776 fired Optimized amine Process regeneration Furnace, reboiler Inc., Model 200, SN: J091036, natural gas 122 D-931 system Exterran, SN: 8907, Triethylene glycol (TEG) Natural gas dehydration Two (2) Devco, Model HeliFlow, SN: 3431-3, natural gas fired hot oil 123 H771 heaters. used Only as a backup. one heater to be operated at a time, the other is to be 124 1O701 Anguil regenerative Environmental thermal Services, oxidizer Inc., Model 200, SN: 14808, rerm�t rvumoer uyvvt l .�e, Issuance .5, was issued to DCP Midstream, LP on October 21, 2016. I. ALLEGED VIOLATIONS AND FACTS On September 23, 2016, Stephen Riley, of the Division, inspected the Facility. Based on Mr. Riley's inspection, and a review of records related to the Facility, the Division has identified the following compliance issues: A. Pursuant to Permit Number 09WE1136 issuance 2, Condition 5, DCP is required to limit emissions from AIRS Point 108 (fugitive emissions, F017) to 31.73 tons per year (tpy) of VOC on a rotting 12 -month basis. DCP exceeded the annual VOC emission limit for AIRS Point 108 for the rotting 12 -month periods ending June 2015 through August 2016, as follows: wxt COLORADO l Air Pollution Control Division -Dig" ' H Rolling ending 12- period Reported tpy month Jun -15 42.35 Jul -15 42.39 Aug -15 42.43 Sep -15 42.47 Oct -15 42.51 Nov -15 42.53 Dec -15 42.51 Jan -16 42.49 Feb -16 42.59 Mar -16 42.57 Apr -16 42.55 May -16 42.53 Jun -16 42.20 Jul -16 41.87 Aug -16 41.54 DCP exceeded the annual VOC emission limit for AIRS Point 108 for the rolling 12 -month periods ending June 2015 through August 2016, in violation of Permit Number 09WE1136, Condition 5.1 B. Pursuant to Permit Number 09WE1136 Issuance 2, Condition 33, DCP must demonstrate compliance with the requirements of this permit by following the operating and maintenance (O&M) plan and record keeping format approved by the Division. The approved OEtM plan for AIRS Point 102 (engine C-167) states that DCP shalt establish the catalyst differential pressure (dP) baseline during each initial compliance and portable analyzer test. DCP must monitor and record the catalyst dP monthly and must maintain catalyst dP within (plus or minus) 2 inches of water column from the baseline. DCP failed to maintain catalyst dP within (plus or minus) 2 inches of water column from the baseline for AIRS Point 102 for the months of November 2015, December 2015, and January 2016, in violation of Permit Number 09WE1136, Condition 33. C. Pursuant to Permit Number 09WE1136, Condition 33, DCP must demonstrate compliance with the requirements of this permit by following the OFtM plan and record keeping format approved by the Division. The approved O£tM plan for AIRS Point 110 (TANKS) states that the thief hatch seals shall be inspected for integrity annually and DCP submitted an APEN to the Division on July 27, 2015 requesting an increase to the annual permitted emission limit for AIRS Point 108 from 31.73 tpy to 50.79 tpy of VOC. Issuance 3 of Permit Number 09WE1136 with the increased annual emission limit for AIRS Point 108 of 50.8 tpy of VOC was issued to DCP on October 21, 2016. COLORADO Air Pollution Control Division replaced as necessary; pressure relief valves (PRV) shall be inspected annually for proper operation and replaced as necessary; and PRVs shall be set to release at a pressure that will ensure flashing, working and breathing losses (as applicable) are routed to the control device under normal operating conditions. DCP failed to perform an inspection on the thief hatch seals and PRVs during 2015, in violation of Permit Number 09WE1136, Condition 33. During the inspection on September 23, 2016, emissions were observed with an IR camera from the PRVs on two of the four tanks, demonstrating that DCP failed to ensure that PRVs were set to release at a pressure that ensured flashing, working and breathing losses were routed to the control device under normal operating conditions, in violation of Permit Number 09WE1136, Condition 33. D. Pursuant to COC Paragraph 13, repairs shall be completed on the seven (7) components remaining on Delay of Repair no later than the next process unit shutdown before the end of 2016. DCP completed repairs on the seven (7) components remaining on Delay of Repair on December 28, 2016. However, a process unit shutdown on all units occurred from September 12 to September 15, 2016. DCP failed to repair the seven (7) components remaining on Delay of Repair no later than the next process unit shutdown, in violation of COC Paragraph 13. E. Pursuant to COC Paragraph 14, DCP was required to complete any necessary repairs to ensure the PRVs on the condensate storage tanks are operated to ensure flashing, working and breathing losses (as applicable) are routed to the control device under normal operating conditions by September 19, 2016. Venting was observed during the inspection on September 23, 2016, demonstrating that DCP fatted to make necessary repairs by September 19, 2016, in violation of COC Paragraph 14. DCP repaired the PRVs on September 26, 2016. It is important to resolve the above -referenced issues as soon as possible. Therefore, the Division encourages DCP to immediately identify those compliance issues that are not in dispute and to rectify those issues before the upcoming Compliance Advisory meeting. In accordance with 5 25-7-115(3)(a), C.R.S., the Compliance Advisory meeting will be held within thirty (30) days of the Division's issuance of the Compliance Advisory in this matter. The Division also requests that DCP provide the Division with a brief written response to the alleged violations ("Source Response"). The Source Response should identify the undisputed compliance issues and, if an alleged violation is disputed, the basis for the dispute. The Division requests that DCP provide the Source Response, to the attention of Stephen Riley, no ICJ COLORADO y Air Pollution Control Division later than ten business days before the Compliance Advisory meeting. At the upcoming meeting, the Division will confirm the actions taken to rectify the undisputed compliance issues and proceed with unresolved matters as outlined below. If you have any questions regarding this Compliance Advisory, the Division's enforcement processes, or any related issues, please refer to the APCD Enforcement Manual Located at https: / /www.colorado.gov/pacific/sites/default/files/AP- EnforcementandComplianceGuide.pdf and/or contact the Division personnel identified below. II. COMPLIANCE ADVISORY MEETING DCP is requested to contact the Division and schedule a meeting to: ➢ Discuss the disputed Compliance Advisory issues and answer any remaining questions you may have; ➢ Submit information necessary to successfully show that the deficiencies and noncompliance issues (or any portion of them) are not violations of Colorado's air pollution laws; and ➢ Establish a mutually acceptable schedule and guidelines for the full and final resolution of any remaining deficiencies and noncompliance issues in a timely manner. Please contact the compliance officer identified below by no later than July 13, 2017 to schedule a meeting with the Division to discuss the Compliance Advisory. The Division currently anticipates that the meeting will take place during the week of July 24, 2017. Lydia Jordan, Enforcement Advisor (303-692-3399) cc: Shannon McMillan, APCD Jennie Morse, APCD Chris Laplante, APCD Arch Crouse, APCD Michael Stovern, EPA (Region VIII) Stephen Riley, APCD Jen Mattox, APCD Heather Wuollet, APCD Tom Roan, Attorney General's Office File COLORADO Air Pollution Control Division M..... Lei elw.4.04.....04%•~41%..0.0.1.401411vom.14th.A‘ONIL'a. r O k-7 ..w.nw wnvn»w..wS— ...n+... — NW WU, AMY /2 / • / i ! ` i EXHIBIT CM - fa C -4*(eC a 5 1ti5e t7eg3- SqL r e / • e Crt. M -. Ili -2th2a4rir /ad -.•i "s" alisar !t . ' i fre; I el - - - . 4i.....4/ ✓.. J -K n O wnmMMwTtx . mnn.w+•am�w+ Wismitat mate —isms -• aeon - cazi- to(04.. list yo -• wxw,, . .,III.♦�,..wuan�,.�,"��l .wMw: LAC'.www.Almu. �W j .W ._. ,..H...w.,,,W.Vo.."__.. w..w.swir .... WM.. mar. arm m. . . l .7 onrn n;coitions tva7n(7 • eTh i I. r /LP.) • P- 7. 1 m'. *wee., J. :4.0 s r. /70 re St . . ser Aw�lr..e *MIS -.nor x.OwlAtlw wW.✓iW!Nw . MP^n^V-..y"Ow..MAn104111/pclapt.i::..vir.. .......'y /I Erg ' cer a'.... sea... ti M• nny�NY.rt�.. - �..�.u.. a. r .ea r- / 6/A--) 17 7 r l tc...)67) el 1jegi.bC% I • �r v_is.4.,2wha ja 4 .F cc Pt. CKoh 4f aafr-T Atia &il l • &ft ?5 PL (>1 ,3 Neighborhood to DCP In response to your (DCP) rocuest for specitic proposals. We (your neichoors) want to share our thoughts, knowledge and research Options for sounc recuction walls Options for berm with trees/ shrubs & uric Review may with sound recuction walls, trees/ shrugs Ongoing contraction Mitigation: AIL Souncwalls Ease installation, No heavy equipment required. Craig Cook - U.S. Market Manager (678) 260 — 8687 cell • Options- sound reduction walls NOISEBLOCKTM oarrier wall systems reduce the unwanted noise to acccotaolc levels and block the view for increased security. Phone 1-877-357-2695 Email: Ni (Noise Control Sound Etas rcer Wall panels are fabricated 'nth an outer valid shell of 16118 guage and inner t+erfnnted shell of 2 gunge Panels arc stiffened with 1 R guapr internal channels and edge rails The acoustic grade fill is to 6 pcf long strand fiberglass or mineral wool depending on the ap- plication Roth fills are inert, mildew resistant. vermin proof. and tncobuattble and are suitable for wet/'der and frcetethaw cycling Mating panels are attached lsv inherent tongue and groove panel ioints Typical panel taints are hortrnntal. how ever vertical panel feints arc used depending on the protect rtqutrrmcnts and asrthctccs desire Options- sound reduction walls SonaGuard NotcThc SonaGuard Aosorptivc Noise Barrier is the highest cuality reinforces fiberglass noise barrier on the market. Phone 844-203-8632 Email: • P 1.41 re rim Kip Nu pi . .,. 1 !L1 aNs.rn*�i..�wr•wr . ••.- - Wpm eristalle rarer sigsal fie; ma yl a t Options- berm with treos/ shrubs & irrigation NOTE STR==- SIDE LOOKING SACK AT MFG PLANT a› Minimum 25' berry with brick work hero and there, grass anc staggerea trocs of various varieties. Options- berm with trees/ shrubs & irrigation c0nt4purappi ,, . .... 1__. :. Anandarko site CR 18 and 21 Minimum of 20' high. You can see how roac slopes up into plant. This berm goes around the entire ocrimctcr. • • 194. 0 irri g tions - berm with trecs/ shru ation (cont.) 3 Rows of frees 16 trees per 100' Full Size Evergreen tree: to Colorado Spruce, Austrian Pine, Ponderosa Pine Multi Stem Tree: Canada Rea Cherry, Amor Maple, Tatarian Maple Full Size Shade Tree: Princeton Elm, Hackberry, Bar Oak Sensation Maple DS & 41 Full Sae Evergreen tree. Colorado Spruce, Austrian Pus, POndtrpfa Pure • Multi Stern Trey: Canada Ited Cherry, Arr+ot Maple, Tatarian Maple fun Size Shade tree.. Princeton Elm, Hackberry, tar Oak Sensation maple map with sound reduction walls, Berms, trees/ shrubs Ongoing contraction Mitigation & Observation Thanks for the construction signage Roducing the lights at night PfP-Ongoing contraction Mitigation: Dirt work now. Need dust reduction Examples: Cow compost, straw , seeding, water • Q&A Thank you, I'd like to speak about Berms. There are 3 packets containing pictures and descriptions of the 8 different sites that I visited in Weld County. Another two sites are included in the power point addendum. Please note that I wasn't able to access the sites in their entirety due to trespassing concerns. Most of my observations were taken from the roadways adjacent to the various sites. I estimated the footprints of the sites and the heights of the berms encompassing them. These packets will be going around the room for you to look at. I will focus on 6 slides that represent the various locations and sizes of the berms. Please refer to the packets for more pictures of each site and their descriptions. There are at least 5 different types of industries represented I this presentation that construct berms and each industry has their own financial resources available for constructing them. DCP is by far the largest of its kind in the gas and oil industry and it is the most financially resourceful of all the companies that are represented in this presentation according to the information on company websites. The other companies like Excel Energy are large but the homebuilders are local and significantly smaller and have less financial resources available than DCP. The old sugar mill in Johnstown was by far a very small and local company with limited financial resources and yet they have a 10' berm around the perimeter on a location on their site. The industries represented are: Gas and Oil Xcel Energy Home Developers Manufacturing And an Old Sugar Mill All but 3 sites would be considered large and on par with Mewbourn's footprint. What I found was: Berms are common among a variety of industries, they can be very substantial, meaning 20-30' high and around the entire perimeter of a site. The larger sites, with tall equipment typically berm around their entire perimeter but this isn't limited to just the larger sites. The berms consist of: dirt native grasses trees and shrubs. Irrigation is used to establish the plants When the pictures were shown to the neighbors, many people commented on just how normal and common place berms are! I absolutely agree, the construction of berms is a normal and common practice that a variety of industries invest their financial resources in for the benefit of good relations with their neighbors. I'd like to show the 6 slides now so that you can see a few examples of what I'm talking about. Slide one please: Excel Energy plant is on CR 19 and CR 18 in Firestone It is an example of an aesthetically pleasing berm that is substantial in nature. I estimated its height to be about 25' on the north side and it extends at least a1/4 mile along the north side of the plant. In the packet that is going around, you will see pictures of the south side where the berm is 15'. Notice the variety of trees and how they are staggered at various heights along the entire berm. Also notice that the berm is in grass. Excel also went to the expense to add brick work at the entrance and along several breaks along the north side. This is a fairly large site Slide 2 please: Slide two is an Anandarko gas industry site located on CR 18 and CR 21, just to the NE of the Excel site. This is a large site also. Notice that this site also has a substantial berm and it goes around the entire perimeter. It is about 25/ tall. On the south side, they have installed a variety of trees along the top of the berm. There a very few neighbors close in to these two sites and yet Excel and Anandarko have gone to the expense of constructing a substantial berm around their entire perimeters. Slide 3 please: This site is located just off of Crossroads Blvd and Hwy 257. It is just west of the home development that is going in for Water Valley that also has a berm that wilt be shown in the next slide. It is a fairly small gas industry site and is bermed with Rolling Hills and trees. There are several breaks in the berm for pipeline access I'm assuming. It looks very natural. With this slide, and the photos in the packet, I wanted to point out that this type of berm is actually very aesthetically pleasing as it looks very natural, even with the breaks. Having breaks in the berm to address pipeline concerns was an issue that Craig brought up at the last meeting when he suggested that having breaks might look weird. In fact, it doesn't look weird but very natural. Slide 4 please: This site is at Crossroads Blvd and Hwy 257. It's a Homebuilders site at Water Valley along the ridgeline above. This is a picture of a huge berm, 30' high and at least al/4 mile long if not longer. It is being built by a Home Developer and for no apparent reason, in my opinion. The berm will block the view of the valley from the homes being built to the south side of it. In fact, 1 am having trouble understanding why a home builder would go through the expense of building such a substantial berm if it isn't necessary and actually blocks views and takes up valuable real estate. Yet, we have a local home builder financing a huge berm, which begs the question, if a home builder with less financial means than DCP constructs a berm for an unknown purpose, why can't DCP finance a substantial berm to address the very real concerns of its neighbors? Slide 5 please: This is a large site again along Crossroads blvd and just to the west of a housing development. I estimate the berm to be between 25'30' high visually limiting the plant presence. It is bermed around the entire perimeter Slide 6 please: This site is very large and comparable to Mewbourn's footprint and is an oil and gas industry site. It is also on Crossroads Blvd west of the other sites. I estimate the berm to be at 30' and it goes around 3 sides of the site, to the W, N and E and may eventually encompass the south side when construction is completed. It is directly east of a very large home development that is being prepared for building residential homes. This berm basically makes the large plant disappear from the view of its future neighbors. In conclusion: Construction of berms, some which are very substantial and encompass the entire perimeter of their sites, is a normal and commonplace practice. Various types of industries construct berms for a variety of reasons. The financial ability to construct berms varies from local companies to the larger industries, yet DCP is by far the largest and wealthiest of the companies represented in this presentation according to my research. I would like for DCP to give serious consideration about how the construction of a substantial berm around the majority of the perimeter at the Mewbourn would be an investment in current and future relationships with its neighbors. DCP, as a company, may want to entertain the idea that constructing substantial berms around their various sites, wherever they may be located, should be automatically included in their "standards of Best Practices". It seems to me that Excel Energy, Anandarko, and the local Homebuilders take their responsibilities of being good neighbors far more seriously than DCP to date. I hope that you will give this serious consideration in your response to our suggestions and recommendations for constructing a berm at the Mewbourn site. In my opinion, and from my observations regarding berms at other locations, I feel that this is a reasonable request and is an investment in the future. As your neighbors, we are recommending that DCP construct a substantial berm around the majority of the perimeter of the Mewbourn site as it is evidenced that it is a normal and commonplace practice among a variety of industries located in northern Colorado and it is quite attainable. n tit e • - • ;g: 1 1 • • h .a> if: 51 ft 1 p A X F P 4. __....mil .r+.**. f fin • S en w; 4 r .AI I N United States Map data O2017 Google s Sr 00 � Ciali5F0fiDS V✓ k-./ `1 ✓ /Jr r 1,'' !- yr c- L- c y J f ! `? i/V 1, 4./. Is dG / C70 7A/ I) ES TJM �rE BERM AT 3o'rte- (ExFIirT s ITC I / %. •- a Se Ns ' . {r.•• r.r • 3w• r • ♦ 1 a • a a • zage-4-- ti JOit3Si1reeie_7. -' c ^,4e. 1 • Berm can bec1onel ,3 roccrDete c o i\i" f 100Ki r, ' rune: ic'o € v i C Iv rw KOS RO CDs BLVD - SMALL „SIT E JUST SOUTH DP LMRGt6 r R m- ExHIFIT 1CSVt aR-R10. &ioes flouJb P LALEtER OF T►+►s SITE - (D�i� arProx. SirE 2- S "P I WI a es 5rrE FLATt\E- eft -ST- FRom Dr) cRc�.s MftDS. SrO4LL Gps SITE B'1 Homes. ESTIMATE BtYLI'h fir ISM ALL Roc( PeePt m ET Ei P2 • i3RErtK-S" /N1 BERTn HE gE 7-HERG SITE ta NOTICE TRLLCK HE) c„ 1-1 TS — ESTIMATE 13•Eg 14/1 AT 15' CjoES A-Anus/des PERIMETeR EV EN) TO EAST 5IT‘q V✓ ) A/ ITS. 5 CRcSSPoftDS * n w7 ao � tk/ftTER v RtLF`/ ?L&TUi1A tiDuS TMrWLd. vER'! L&R1E BERm xna. PiEnLL'J NO REPtsw Fog BE-RifYi- SLoCkS Home tS vista/ OF DIE VY\LLEVW. r SEE 43EPfr iti Bt'1c-IcY'Wt). EXPENSIVE Axib Fog wttrt-r? Srg5 N • es 0 3 sro gy /tfouse or 5111 % PrN/Fk tJ%Nfl'LO TILL TOW x/E O. R. 18 + agne I 4 H u (At 13DE ie-rn nLowb PE1zeipig FSr/MyrrE f{E IU HT AT 261t SUtSThbrrI V A -gel GIN of TeEes ets611/4/T-E---O Ve9 few 60Se. in neiyk6ors S W N ;rrti Worn fZofrD TD cjcA7H Loos- ► Nrn iv b N W z5 A itAMMATIZAcu • K-ai i ow Svc E ;'nl J sc nakte, r / \fah e -k3 u -r a5' FE12--\rne-TEte. SwsTh-,rrcPL XceL &tJ61aEjy S W Var e nd levels 1 of -}reeS 6enso l'1" E $ Eric Ewing 16974 CR 40 La Salle, CO 80645 October 31, 2017 Weld County, Board of County Commissioners RE: Addendum #1: DCP Mewbourn Landscape & Screening for 5MJUSR-83-542 Dear County Commissioners, The following is additional information to consider for the agenda item regarding the conditions of approval for DCP Mewbourn on November 1, 2017. It would be nice to have the screening wall block the new plant on the north side too. This was brought to DCP's attention multiple times at the town halls, so I believe they are aware of the request. Here are some pictures to help show the area of concern. alt NEW MEWBOURN 111 GAS PLANT TEMPORARY coPamettCTION ENTRANCE MTN TEMPORARY TRACKING CONTROL 1 NEEDS SCREEN 1/1/i^ #1457-35-s-00-002 ACRES) at WOW M. MINTY MAP t' -1st 21,404 nDTW • 2e'a7' AI Nq WATER FEATURE It RQ.w. M. Page 1of3 Y cc PARCEL 1957-35-. 6.22 ACHES MAa EyrTW LAPIS NN EX1S 11.416 Oat WHOifft0f CMS PLANT aro' tO W ~POSED tt COSMRJNNNP.A T from SWFM (19 OIL TANK Stephanie Frederick From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Terri <terridechant@yahoo.com> Monday, October 30, 2017 5:29 PM Eric Ewing; Stephanie Frederick Gerald Johnson; Tisa Juanicorena; Rocky Rissler; Esther Gesick; Pat & Dick Stahl; Scott & Rochell Sherman; Rick Margheim; Rick; Cindy & Randy Clement; Ed & Jill Lafferty; Lynette Kilpatrick; Jeff Carlson; Pete Ulrich; sherih24@msn.com; hartness1992 @gmail.com; doug@dl-t.com; juanitasthoughts@gmail.com; Miller Re: RE: RE: DCP Landscape Plan 20171030_172019_resizedjpg Thanks EE I'm also forwarding on the attached notice to my neighbors. I received the attached notice in the mail today please pass on as needed. Thank Terri Dechant Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone Original message From: Eric Ewing <ewinghr@yahoo.com> Date: 10/30/2017 12:35 PM (GMT -07:00) To: Stephanie Frederick <sfrederick@weldgov.com> Cc: Gerald Johnson <geraldjohnson733@gmail.com>, Tisa Juanicorena <tjuanicorena@weldgov.com>, Rocky Rissler <rockyrissler@gmail.com>, Esther Gesick <egesick@weldgov.com>, "Don & Terri Dechant" <terridechant@yahoo.com>, Pat & Dick Stahl <shfarms@skybeam.com>, Scott & Rochell Sherman <msrochell44@yahoo.com>, Rick Margheim <rickmargheim@aol.com>, Rick <rick@aintrightranch.com>, Cindy & Randy Clement <clem970@aol.com>, Ed & Jill Lafferty <heavenlyhavens@msn.com>, Lynette Kilpatrick <electandconnect@gmail.com>, Jeff Carlson <jcarlson201240@gmail.com>, Pete Ulrich <peteulrich@aol.com>, sherih24@msn.com, hartness1992@gmail.com, doug@dl-t.com, juanitasthoughts@gmail.com, Miller <ramjr@gmx.com> Subject: Re: RE: RE: DCP Landscape Plan Dear Stephanie, The neighbors Power Point can be downloaded at this link: https://drive.google.com/open?id=OBxsWkz02mpFhaXQ4M3pDWExNTkE If time allows, would you be able to confirm for us that you downloaded the slide show and that slides 64 (video only) and 66 and 72 have video with audio? Much thanks! EE On Monday, October 30, 2017, 8:29:15 AM MDT, Stephanie Frederick <sfrederick@weldgov.com> wrote: 1 Mr. Ewing, et al, Please email your presentation to me and if you would like to show up around 8:30 a.m., Wednesday morning we can let you in the Board room. Also, there is an IT employee present at the hearings to assist with technical issues. Best Regards, Stephanie Frederick Deputy Clerk to the Board Clerk to the Board 1150 "O" Street, Greeley, Colorado 80631 970-400-4219 Confidentiality Notice: This electronic transmission and any attached documents or other writings are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify sender by return e-mail and destroy the communication. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action concerning the contents of this communication or any attachments by anyone other than the named recipient is strictly prohibited. From: Eric Ewing [mailto:ewinghr@yahoo.com] Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2017 8:31 PM To: Stephanie Frederick <sfrederick@weldgov.com> Cc: Gerald Johnson <geraldjohnson733@gmail.com>; Tisa Juanicorena <tuanicorena@weldgov.com>; Rocky Rissler < rockyrissler@gmail.com>; Esther Gesick <egesick@weldgov.com>; Don & Terri Dechant <terridechant@yahoo.com>; Pat & Dick Stahl <shfarms@skybeam.com>; Scott & Rochell Sherman < msrochell44@yahoo.com>; Rocky Rissler <rockyrissler@gmail.com>; Rick Margheim <rickmargheim@aol.com>; Rick < rick@aintrightranch.com>; Gerald Johnson <geraldjohnson733@gmail.com>; Cindy & Randy Clement <clem970@aol.com>; Ed & Jill Lafferty <heavenlyhavens@msn.com>; Lynette Kilpatrick <electandconnect@gmail.com>; Jeff Carlson <jcarlson201240@gmail.com>; Pete Ulrich <peteulrich@aol.com>; sherih24@msn.com; hartness1992@gmail.com; doug@dl-t.com; juanitasthoughts@gmail.com; Miller <ramjr@gmx.com> Subject: Re: RE: DCP Landscape Plan 2 Dear Stephanie, The property owners that have been working with DCP on the landscape plan have prepared a Power Point presentation that includes embedded video with audio. We would like to present it at the hearing on Wednesday at 9 a.m. to help clarify our landscape and screening needs that DCP has not addressed to our satisfaction. We have decided that combining our individual 3 minutes for the duration it takes neighbor Rich Hartness to walk through the presentation would be more efficient for everyone's time. Would you like us to send the Power Point presentation to you ahead of time? Email or USB Drive? Do we use your equipment or ours? (Projector, Laptop, Stereo) Would we be able to set up before the 9:00 a.m. hearing to make sure it all works correctly? Would the County be able to supply an IT employee to help before and during the meeting? Your assistance is appreciated! Sincerely, Eric Ewing 970-347-7 3 0 0 fir r cia 0 es tois '-''CR 'ad •-• re 0 0 3 is7. m c co Oz. fit up, 0 'r Z ‘aZ 5 9? os O C, co _et o re. w w alma pia 544. O 0 r P1/4:4 tft4v4 ema rs ca ,..a► s • ? • 0 -a C 0 3 a, O mot amall 011%4 al uitc" Eat ch3 tyro Litc ,a dr) ••••; O r O co CD 013) SD X s" can to cf) cv CD 1 C C, 0 w,. or w • CD O 6 C C A N O D (76 O 5. at. a n g 3 O-Oc Socco 3 07) O liss• sa 0 a c %Ic re7,3 c, *13 to. cts y 0 "c.a.= c Q) "wrist re Ark 8 32 r risz 13 0 -to -77 defa O fir u) c.40 - —t .1 DI a "! :r"' IS 04'2 eff o co cp rA), to 15 e KT) =fr 5.40 _ CD �_ s r a�...►. au a, • O itio� w 3 M CD ?: C13 row fey!) ein t1 11O amp- arij wen '1 NOTICE Pursuant to the zoning laws of the State of Colorado and the Weld County Code, a public hearing will be held in the Chambers of the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, Weld County Administration Building, 1150 O Street, Assembly Room, Greeley, Colorado 80631, at the time specified. If a court reporter is desired, please advise the Clerk to the Board, in writing, at least five days prior to the hearing. The cost of engaging a court reporter shall be borne by the requesting party. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if special accommodations are required in order for you to participate in this hearing, please contact the Clerk to the Board's Office at (970) 336-7215, Extension 4226, prior to the day of the hearing. The complete case file may be examined in the office of the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, Weld County Administration Building, 1150 O Street, Greeley, Colorado 80631. E -Mail messages sent to an individual Commissioner may not be included in the case file. To ensure inclusion of your E -Mail correspondence into the case file, please send a copy to egesick@co.weld.co.us. DATE: November 1, 2017 TIME: 9:00 a.m. APPLICANT: DCP Operating Company, LP 3620 W. 10th Street #410 Greeley, Colorado 80631 REQUEST: To Determine Satisfaction of Condition of Approval #1.C of 5th Amended Use by Special Review Permit, 5MJUSR17-83-542 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot A of Amended Recorded Exemption, AMRE-591, and Lot B of Corrected Recorded Exemption, CORR RE -3203, being part of the SE1/4 of Section 35, Township 4 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: North of and adjacent to CR 38, west of and adjacent to CR 35 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO DATED: October 20, 2017 Pursuant to the zoning laws of ti hearing will be held in the Chambers Colorado, Weld County Administration Colorado 80631, at the time specified. If a court reporter is desired, pIE days prior to the hearing. The cost of E party. In accordance with the Americ, required in order for you to participate Office at (970) 336-7215, Extension 42: The complete case file may be E Commissioners, Weld County Administ E -Mail messages sent to an individual ensure inclusion of your E -Mail corn egesick@co.weld.co.us. DATE: November 1, 2017 TIME: 9:00 a.m. APPLICANT: DCP Operating Company, LP 3620 W. 10th Street #410 Greeley, Colorado 80631 REQUEST: To Determine Satisfaction Special Review Permit, 5MJUSR17-83-! LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot A of Am Corrected Recorded Exemption, COF: Township 4 North, Range 68 West of thr LOCATION: North of and adjacent to ( BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONEF WELD COUNTY, COLORADO DATED: October 20, 2017 • V) M ti O m MN z C OWOil429 5:pc tki_ jooco 0 NOO SSV13 1SHId a3J.HOS3ad co Lc) C °m W co = I -I -I 0 wco U U) OX CCOOw W c m w CC Urd(..7 I— x— LJ C C� 6.4 T' C°, a Is do a c <n °a c. p Et IvO(u mco 00 ci) (1)co Ci J r J a, o a, o a, a) o a, a, _ � a) a) O a, T a, — •> aJ L 0 a, v a, a) a) a, o � a) a, •5 a, Cl) L L ? Q, cu a, Cl) a f0 f0 J f6 N ate, f0 f0 i f0 f0 f0 f0 f0 f0 a, • f0 (O • f0 f0 > > N f0 I- _ CO O f0 a) V) V) i V) 41 +'' V) f0 V) C V) V) V) V) V) V) ., +, V) V) +, V) V) C C CD V) U 0_ N 0_ J J LL J C7 0- Jas J 0 (. co CU O ....... d J J 0_ J J 0 0 C7 J 01 4-, V) V) N N "O en cc N L O X E O -O m cc 'CT) +, U, Li, a v IA O O X LL cc 00 I- cc ,--I co N Ln v Z O- O O Cl) a` Ln 0 x O U f0 C J F- f0 J NL V1 Ol O M Ln j Ln O .N-1 M=_ M O N M Q M �' N M in L N U CO U X U U U 4 U U x U -4--. LLI 0C n. „„ m O „„ O m oM it m QO Q N M Ol N N N O 0 0 00 +, ao LD O 00 O 00 LO 00 < r-i Q U U O U v, Y a O L) J O O LL. J a, Ca C C a, J 'C - f0 f0 N OA 0_ OA co vi as f0 L v E Y Z E a G 0 0_ O O U , Vf f0 2 OS) •C U d c LL E u C E c c L a L O O Vf L a.., CU O Y O f0 a, �' CZ -a f0 4-4 C 0 a, U L �J fD C 'd W p O f 0 O J >D aJ O f0 vv, f0 OD OD d .� `^ O p Ll, C O LL Y L% a, = C +O, E C cc LL a, CU a, -0 a, —� Y f0 t0 L �, 7 f0 N a, C LL d4 C m co a1 m c LL "d -p L L "� U -6 a, f0 c0 C alf0 G f0 }' f0 i, C •E i= O W f0 f6 CU CUcV .fO O_ -p L C cc C L "d f0 C L - U U Z J 0 U J J C J 0 J C:J 0 Q U J d' U LL O c Z LL V) c W 15716 CR 40 5230 Lakeshore Dr 17313 CR 38 18874 CR 33 16782 CR 40 17313 CR 38 16979 CR 40 STATE ZIP 80651-8410 N N Lfl N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O U^ U U U U U U U U U U U Z U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U N x I .--1 Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln m c -I Ln Ln r1 Ln Ln Ql N i--1 Ln m m .4- th N Ln Ln .4- O O m c}' m O LO LO LO LC) l0 LO ri LC) 1.0 LC) LO CD LC) N N l0 LO Ln O O O O O O O O O 0 0 O O O O O O O O CO 00 00 00 00 CO 00 CO 00 CO 00 CO 00 CO CO 00 00 00 00 c O V)C 80651-8400 34E 80645-9321 80645-9206 57; 80621-9610 D3] 80645-9321 39F 80631-7422 )2f 80651-8409 32. 80645-9218 52) 80651-1217 80645-9208 34f 80217-3779 27534-8341 20487 CR 33 16087 CR 40 18520 CR 33 18435 CR 33 16311 CR 38 17375 CR 38 Scott and Rochell Sherman 370 17th St Eric Jacobsen O O N N f0 f0 O m Ln N LC) Chad Calvert 2115 117th Ave 22911 CR 29 C O 4.4 V1 C L O Dave Kisker a, C v 0 George Courcier v m up O 00 O U 5400 W 11th St, Suite C Craig Rasmuson WELD COUNTY COLORADO LAND RECORDS AFFIDAVIT OF INTERESTED LAND OWNERS SURFACE ESTATE 10/18/2017 2:34:15 PM THE UNDERSIGNED, States that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names, addresses, and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners of the property (the surface estate) within 500 feet of the property being considered. This list was compiled utilizing the records of the Weld County Assessor available on the Weld County Internet Mapping site, http://www.co.weld.co.us, and has not been modified from the original. The list compiled for the records of the Weld Cou r sessor was assembled within thirty days of the applications submission date. /opyp 7 Property Owners Within 500 ft of Parcel # 105735400002 Signature Date Account Parcel Owner Mailing Address R4475686 105735000040 DCP MIDSTREAM LP ATTN: PROPERTY TAX DEPT 5718 WESTHEIMER RD STE 2000 HOUSTON, TX 770575774 R7325798 105735100050 BERIG LEILA BRIDGETT 16730 COUNTY ROAD 40 LA SALLE, CO 806459206 R1422402 105735200002 JOHNSON GERALD 16274 COUNTY ROAD 40 LA SALLE, CO 806459218 R8948173 105735300007 FERGE RICHARD F PO BOX 1217 PLATTEVILLE, CO 806511217 M0127203 105735300053 DECHANT TERRI R2241603 105735300053 DECHANT TERRI M0127203 105735300053 DECHANT DON 18488 COUNTY ROAD 33 LA SALLE, CO 806459208 R2241603 105735300053 DECHANT DONALD 18488 COUNTY ROAD 33 LA SALLE, CO 806459208 R1422602 105735400002 DCP MIDSTREAM LP ATTN: PROPERTY TAX DEPT 5718 WESTHEIMER RD STE 2000 HOUSTON, TX 770575774 Parcels: 18 Owner Records: 21 Page 1 of 4 WELD COUNTY COLORADO LAND RECORDS AFFIDAVIT OF INTERESTED LAND OWNERS SURFACE ESTATE 10/18/2017 2:34:15 PM THE UNDERSIGNED, States that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names, addresses, and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners of the property (the surface estate) within 500 feet of the property being considered. This list was compiled utilizing the records of the Weld County Assessor available on the Weld County Internet Mapping site, http://www.co.weld.co.us, and has not been modified from the original. The list compiled for the records of the Weld County Assessor was assembled within thirty days of the applications submission date. Signature Date Property Owners Within 500 ft of Parcel # 105735400002 Account Parcel Owner Mailing Address R1599202 105735400008 DCP MIDSTREAM LP ATTN: PROPERTY TAX DEPT 5718 WESTHEIMER RD STE 2000 HOUSTON, TX 770575774 R2241703 105735400054 MARGHEIM COLLEEN B R2241703 105735400054 MARGHEIM RICK G 18481 COUNTY ROAD 35 PLATTEVILLE, CO 806518400 R8770300 105736000021 BERIG LEILA C/O MICHAEL BUCK PO BOX 509 LA SALLE, CO 806450509 M4476386 105736000021 BERIG LEILA B 18984 COUNTY ROAD 35 LA SALLE, CO 806459321 R2330103 105736300022 PHELAN MICHAEL E 10314 COUNTY ROAD 23 FORT LUPTON, CO 806219610 R2330203 105736300023 DCP MIDSTREAM LP 3026 4TH AVE GREELEY, CO 806317422 M0253907 105736300023 FEOLA-JUNG LINDA 18230 COUNTY ROAD 35 PLATTEVILLE, CO 806518409 R3363005 121101100001 LUDWIG FAMILY FARMS LLC 18010 COUNTY ROAD 38 PLATTEVILLE, CO 806518410 Parcels: 18 Owner Records: 21 Page 2 of 4 WELD COUNTY COLORADO LAND RECORDS AFFIDAVIT OF INTERESTED LAND OWNERS SURFACE ESTATE 10/18/2017 2:34:15 PM THE UNDERSIGNED, States that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names, addresses, and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners of the property (the surface estate) within 500 feet of the property being considered. This list was compiled utilizing the records of the Weld County Assessor available on the Weld County Internet Mapping site, http://www.co.weld.co.us, and has not been modified from the original. The list compiled for the records of the Weld County Assessor was assembled within thirty days of the applications submission date. Signature Date Property Owners Within 500 ft of Parcel # 105735400002 Account Parcel Owner Mailing Address R6786682 121102100003 ANADARKO E & P COMPANY LP C/O TRAVIS HOLLAND -PROPERTY TAX PO BOX 173779 DENVER, CO 802173779 R6786683 121102100004 ANADARKO E & P COMPANY LP C/O TRAVIS HOLLAND -PROPERTY TAX PO BOX 173779 DENVER, CO 802173779 M4842086 121102100004 CONAGRA FOODS PACKAGED FOODS CO INC C/O BUTTERBALL LLC 501 N OAK FOREST RD GOLDSBORO, NC 275348341 Parcels: 18 Owner Records: 21 Page 3 of 4 WELD COUNTY COLORADO LAND RECORDS AFFIDAVIT OF INTERESTED LAND OWNERS SURFACE ESTATE 10/18/2017 2:34:15 PM THE UNDERSIGNED, States that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names, addresses, and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners of the property (the surface estate) within 500 feet of the property being considered. This list was compiled utilizing the records of the Weld County Assessor available on the Weld County Internet Mapping site, http://www.co.weld.co.us, and has not been modified from the original. The list compiled for the records of the Weld County Assessor was assembled within thirty days of the applications submission date. Signature Date Property Owners Within 500 ft of Parcel # 105735400002 Owner Records: 21 Parcels: 18 Page 4of4 N 4 0 o- j 90 O GO O a q po O 60 �� o � wi VQ o .kloCo Q, CD� Q 0 a� e o QCI) -., *- - a '-'. $ S7 s -,._. ADDRESS K -7.-0 1.. ,-.... a� ,4 \--, ''' °� r r c c.() �` J , \J ,, N J „ �Y M �i m 0� __ Q[ u -- d- c/- v v 3 N. �. EMAIL I t ,, ,,..) , , 8 ; 4-0- —54 J E 7. 1 ft c) p_. \, A ''' ,3_ _.-C 1/43 (.1r -I Z- _, ,_,' Ci __,..C. it-i' •It.-- Z-- ,1-.-..- \ C \r, Q -\'- NAMEPLEASE PRINT, LEGIBLY I C t)j 2 .� (1 ` r- LAJ U z r _ z r, W Q LI.J F - Q t./) ,1-. -----ocio `,L‘. \)\ ri v Q ` b f 03 .? ‘jo '3 CITY Jam �-, , ,§ 3 a 7 4' o ADDRESS s ,a '-'..3 .?,_4 is ci (`(-) „,. , _ ,., -41.--. , Q csn c -- 0, cr U, V3 ,-1 ( J3, 3 "& � ' ,i,,,;_i j '_ ..,,, EMAIL 3 L 3' S v, i _$ -. d � a s. —....-.Q • 2' ...._.s 0 44 ')C. I DAME - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY` - , --- Q� , ., 4- --- . ,-1,L - .... A . .__< A 'C a a IV N O0 O ST cS CITY ADDRESS 0 L J k^ v) 3 9 0 EMAIL 5 1... R,) ,1 Fa. :-;--d U ) V N5ME - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY C1 L J vs V t.)3 A £ Weld County Board of Commissioners' granted approval to DCP's application for a USR permit on July 17, 2017, subject to certain conditions, including the following: "A Landscaping/Screening Plan to mitigate visual impacts shall be submitted to the Department of Planning Services after consultation with area property owners within one-half mile and/or others requesting notice..." Resolution on USR Permit No. 5MJUSR17-83-542, page 4 10/31/2017 02 1 10/31/2017 Mewbourn Plant Site Characteristics The site characteristics present challenges to a comprehensive landscaping plan. • The property covers approximately 120 acres • The eastern 40% (approximately) will be covered by existing and new facilities. • The eastern site boundary is located immediately adjacent to CR35. • Multiple underground structures cross the site from east to west, and north to south. • Site topography is varied from west to east and north to south, with a total grade change of 35 feet from the highest point on the southeast to the northwest corner. 3 Mewbourn Landscaping Plan Community Outreach • DCP met with the area property owners on August 16 and September 12, 2017 • Each meeting lasted approximately three hours. • At the August 16 meeting, DCP presented information about communications plan, lighting and sound mitigation plans, and solicited community input about landscaping preferences. • DCP showed an initial plan involving extending the barrier wall on the west side of the new facilities, and a row of evergreen trees outside the walls on the west side. • At the September 12 meeting, DCP presented a revised plan • Four areas of tree plantings on the Mewbourn property • A concrete barrier wall on the west side of the new facilities • Opaque slats added to the existing chainlink perimeter fence. 4 2 10/31/2017 DCP MIDSTREAM - MEWBOURN FACILITY Pipelines and Site Photos September 2017 7 5 Mewbourn Plant Site a i 2.1i 1. .L- i 1 III i:dit-,5.., i t_- �imri !-; i iii I'',, Cr i. III 111! : I ii, 1.4444, Ir � a. War >....>.. 3t3S t "itf" ._ .�� I1 e' • t ;try _ li s i• H a .1.. VR wr-Lt. 11.Y[- .=.-a.---se t. 5MJUSR 17-83-542 r Whit !o &n:! rLw.a. :..,.w........ N.It LLi :• •!/:.LL - main ilu& - ... • 41 J N KA'w.ar ! a wtt !may' la 4 ... (• . \LSGIIi a:.. era D 't.•r m.^ i0047Y ;asR 110 w`RWL•Ys VI GO P,A 7 •'11-4.3.1 Llti1;.J'L 'Lt 6 3 10/31/2017 Mewbourn Landscaping Plan Elements • Sound -absorbing 15' screening wall on east and west side of new facilities, constructed of precast concrete in stone -block pattern, tan or buff color. • 2100 -foot long berm on northwest perimeter, contoured to provide visual interest. • Irrigated plantings of mixed evergreen trees (200+), shrubs and native grasses along berm, and in three locations to the north, southwest and southeast of plant facilities • Locations of plantings chosen to maximize viewscape for adjacent residents • Trees and shrubs planted in natural groupings • Vegetation chosen for compatibility with environment, preference for native species, where possible. • Tall ornamental grasses planted outside eastern fence. 7 4 10/31/2017 SoundTec Wall Options eris\-Arrgc Standard Textures P. wa OS Mt ,* Custom Designs Are A►so Available SoursiTec 9 5 t'11.'N- Pt M WELD COUNTY ADNIINIST N BUILDING 1150 Cr Shsbl • Or , CO 6063' REVIEW OF THE PROPOSED CCP MEWBOURN GAS PLANT LANDSCAPE PLAN 10/31/2017 DCP MIDSTREAM — MEWBOURN FACILITY oem.aart Ds�f 4 ..... PLOWS* all W.... 4� I- i lari WIII I\ ?WS t 1t.; r-nr '"../ :' : llf�'il" I ...�1 itf "MD , . ... .._.. �..0 _ .F_.__...._.� - ,. — OW dc w wwt— DCP Mewbourn Gas Plant I Enhanced Landscape Plan for Approva 2 The south and east side of the facility have the greatest restrictions primarily due to the construction of the plan` infrastructure and the future right-of-way associated with County Road 35. Perimeter fencing e nhanced with with Pampas grass planted in natural groupings to avoid u nderground infrastructure e ncumbrances In lieu of a line of trees as initially proposed, the upright evergreen trees will be planted in patterns resembling natural groupings. The SoundTec modular wall system are: precast concrete panels installed between columns, with the face of the wall designed to the resemble local area stone. This sound wall system is designed to provide sound absorption, which will add to the existing noise mitigation features of DCP's engineering design EARTH BERM ENHANCEMENT The elongated berm of limited but variable height along the northwestern perimeter of the property creates a landscape feature that offers visual interest and some screening. Irrigated tree plantings, shrubs and native grasses will be planted on and near the berm in patterns found in the native Colorado landscape. 10/31/2017 WEST PROPERTY LINE - ENHANCED LANDSCAPE TREATMENT Medium-sized evergreen trees, in several varieties chosen for compatibility with the physical environment, as well as compatible shrubs and native grasses. A drip irrigation system will be necessary to provide adequate water and sustain the tree and shrub plantings EAST PROPERTY LANDSCAPE TREATMENT ENHANCED Medium-sized evergreen trees, in several varieties selected for compatibility with the physical environment, as well as compatible shrubs and native grasses. Trees are planted in patterns resembling natural groupings rather than in rows. A drip irrigation system will be necessary to provide adequate water and sustain the tree and shrub plantings 5 10/31/2017 DCP MIDSTREAM - MEWBOURN FACILITY Med County Conceptual Landecspe and Screening Plan e w> �I a SCAM V cae October 30, 2017 ENHANCED CONCEPT LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR APPROVAL As discussed, DCP proposes to use medium-sized evergreen trees, as well as compatible shrubs and native grasses planted in patterns resembling natural groupings rather than in rows. A drip irrigation will be installed. A sound wall will be constructed for noise mitigation. Through these actions DCP believes this comprehensive approach will produce a sustainable landscape that is most likely to provide the visual and mitigation benefits desired by the community. S 6 Notary Public BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' SIGN POSTING CERTIFICATE THE LAST DAY TO POST THE SIGN IS OCTOBER 20, 2017 THE SIGN SHALL BE POSTED ADJACENT TO AND VISIBLE FROM A PUBLICALLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY. IN THE EVENT THE PROPERTY BEING CONSIDERED FOR A SPECIAL REVIEW IS NOT ADJACENT TO A PUBLICALLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES SHALL POST ONE SIGN IN THE MOST PROMINENT PLACE ON THE PROPERTY AND POST A SECOND SIGN AT THE POINT AT WHICH THE DRIVEWAY (ACCESS DRIVE) INTERSECTS A PUBLICALLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY. I, KIM OGLE, HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTIES OF PERJURY THAT THE SIGN WAS POSTED ON THE PROPERTY AT LEAST TEN DAYS BEFORE THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS HEARING FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE SITE LANDSCAPE PLAN ASSOCIATED WITH A SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND 5TH AMENDED USE BY SPECIAL. REVIEW PERMIT NO. USR-542 FOR MINERAL RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT FACILITIES, OIL AND GAS SUPPORT AND SERVICE, {NATURAL GAS PROCESSING FACILITY, THE ADDITION OF GAS PROCESSING EQUIPMENT AND ONE (1) UP TO ONE HUNDRED (100) FEET IN HEIGHT SECURE COMMUNICATIONS TOWER IN THE A (AGRICULTURAL) ZONE DISTRICT. (DCP OPERATING COMPANY, LP — MEWBOURN GAS PLANT). KIM OGLE Name a Person Posting Sign Signature of '' a on Posting Sign STATE OF COLORADO )ss. COUNTY OF WELD The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to me this et WITNESS my hand and official seal. My Commission Expires: Waal) ti day of eadar }2017 KRISTINE RANSLEM NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID 20124034827 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 5, 2020 Pubt r hearings concerning this properly wallbe heard before The County Pia'ininq Commis ,ion anti Board cii County Commissioners Both hearings will be held nr: WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 1150 "O" Street • Greeley, CD 80631 Board of County Corntnis.sioner Hearing will be 01 ['In ae°OeBL REVIEW OF THE =_- PROPOSED DCP MEW6OURN GAS PLANT LANDSCAPE PLAN Case,. ! , F0R FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT :Pr ilia AT 1HE WELD COUNTY DEPA M PIA NNINNJc S pt,Pi Es, AT * ` F,:-= < M1,ru rod 4231_44411 !tar; sl ti� i iciapt it -s ate' . . •�.y�•��, tom=. _-_ tin. ""�ii1,p ,a+i..w�+ah - �,, - /SS to lL C Lc wvtvver bcLafl 3. AI -ftpc (AC- Jen \ tiRc)-2, n6seithP a�f )cpfrofrns5ai_ Svc Cf 32L / Co nt la) z4 H oft \ (c) V796 __cj_ _Cd EL Mafi 4-5 Aicic (45112zarK ca vievt+e 14%-zo Wteic L4cK sake& n • I8Li cr 35 I e v it / g2-/ ar / 83 CAZ 33 /} S c ,c‘S eit/tYiey•AA1/4-c-,._ i 1A c Lc" / — /60/7 Cle // LL-:---r(tHiblotiALLz li7r90 ft?3G,_(f\fl w /1 la 561(c/6 5605- L4Saie La Salk., Co S c9c4 catel E e:g' eci_CO +ger: D5jj 3*Lcaj a(tqEs c 7( es ar'hYS3 tAcK Vt i A 4. ci-a6 Ss 0 sc, Pe co _7, I V a 35. a4 chat/fool /(060 o ---/ess620 z-e,e atnieestadese adz-e.L. ^ Jsp co Y 1..-1 c e sAs r �,� r ,� t `., r� r. 'C" rs •. s' "'C'c'r ca F"'(�e'' ��f Ea irhef ill-OVrr erli •;3 l' C-t'c:eU�4i$6.d :� fi� . offit cn L:osrl;h Post Office Box 119 ` K erse ., Colorprio 8.2644 * Phone (97.01...33.07$749 * 97 44 November 2, 2017 Weld County Board of County Commissioners 1150 "O" Street Greeley, CO 80631 Re: DCP Midstream Dear Commissioners, I am writing to you concerning today's Greeley Tribune article about your last meeting with DCP Midstream ("DCP"). As you may know, two years ago, DCP expanded their Lucerne Plant which is located in the NW corner of WCR 64 ("O" Street) and WCR 43 (E2SE4Sec28T6NR65W/6PM). My family and I own the land directly south and downwind of the aforementioned DCP plant. Ever since it's construction, DCP has consistently failed to control the weeds on and around their property there. This situation has caused a tremendous increase in fugitive weed infestation of our irrigated farmland at considerable cost and aggravation to us and our tenant fanner, Mr. Perry Wiedeman. Both Mr. Wiedeman and I have communicated with DCP annually about this ongoing problem, but to little or no avail. In frustration, just three weeks ago, I tried to contact Mr. Troy Swain, Weld County Oil and Gas Liaison regarding the matter, but he failed to respond to my call. Afterward, I saw Mr. Swain at the conclusion of the last Pipeline Working Group meeting and mentioned to him the continuing weed problems DCP has been causing to our neighborhood. Mr. Swain responded that the issue was "upstream" from him, whatever that meant, but I took it to mean that he did not want to or could not get involved in the matter. The next day I contacted Ms. Tina Booton, Weld County Public Works Department Weed Division Supervisor to report the situation. After Ms. Booton investigated my complaint, she told me that even though most of the weeds were over six feet tall, there was nothing she could "officially" do because the weeds were not "noxious" weeds, which are under her jurisdiction. However, she offered to contact DCP about the situation. Later, Ms. Booton told me DCP informed her that they would have the weeds mowed no later than last Friday, October 27, 2017, which they finally did. The reason I am reporting allof this to you is because today's Tribune article indicated you will be meeting with DCP next Monday to further discuss their plans for expanding another one of their Weld County facilities, and I want you to be aware of DCP's persistent failure to maintain their existing facility which is located only one and one-half miles east of your own offices. Respectfully, HOSHIKO LAND, LLC Dennis J. Hoshiko Manager Stephanie Frederick From: Sent: To: Subject: Commissioners, Randy Clement <clem970@aol.com> Friday, November 03, 2017 7:30 AM Stephanie Frederick proposed landscape plan of DCP Thank you for the continuance. We're glad that you see the landscaping proposal that DCP submitted will not be adequate to any of the surrounding neighbors due to the elevations. 8 foot trees will do nothing for our generation. We need results now. This plant has been an eye and ear sore for us for many years. I agree that trees on the surrounding neighbors property may give us the best chance of hiding the plant. If DCP eliminates trees and the berm and years of watering they can put those dollars towards a wall that would surround the plant on the three sides that we are affected. A 28 foot sound wall would not only hide a substanial part of the plant, but would also help cover the noisiest machines of the plant. IAC acoustics is sending a proposal for a sound sealing wall that is fire proof, weather proof rust proof, wind proof, and will last over a 100 years. DCP has been in touch with them and a sample of their product was at the last commissioners meeting. They have put walls up around other gas plants with great success for other surrounding communities. Building this large of an expansion, DCP clearly has the monetary means to afford this project and should to show their neighborly integrity. They won the first fight of getting their expansion, now it's our time for some relief. Thank you, Randy and Cindy Clement 18520 Weld County Road 33 LaSalle, Colorado 80645 1 Stephanie Frederick From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Thanks Rich EXHIBIT Qom a4s-l• es .14Ause,11.74 Terri Dechant <terridechant@yahoo.com> Friday, November 03, 2017 12:00 PM Marlaena Hartness; Stephanie Frederick 'Gerald Johnson'; Tisa Juanicorena; 'Rocky Rissler'; Esther Gesick; 'Pat & Dick Stahl'; 'Scott & Rochell Sherman'; 'Rick Margheim'; 'Rick'; 'Cindy & Randy Clement'; 'Ed & Jill Lafferty'; 'Lynette Kilpatrick'; 'Jeff Carlson'; 'Pete Ulrich'; sherih24@msn.com; doug@dl- t.com; juanitasthoughts@gmail.com; 'Miller'; ewinghr@yahoo.com Re: Estimated views of 5 and 10 foot berms From: Marlaena Hartness <hartness1992@gmail.com> To: 'Stephanie Frederick' <sfrederick@weldgov.com> Cc: 'Gerald Johnson' <geraldjohnson733@gmail.com>; 'Tisa Juanicorena' <tjuanicorena@weldgov.com>; 'Rocky Rissler' <rockyrissler@gmail.com>; 'Esther Gesick' <egesick@weldgov.com>; 'Terri Dechant' <terridechant@yahoo.com>; 'Pat & Dick Stahl' <shfarms@skybeam.com>; 'Scott & Rochell Sherman' <msrochell44@yahoo.com>; 'Rick Margheim' <rickmargheim@aol.com>; 'Rick' <rick@aintrightranch.com>; 'Cindy & Randy Clement' <clem970@aol.com>; 'Ed & Jill Lafferty' <heavenlyhavens@msn.com>; 'Lynette Kilpatrick' <electandconnect@gmail.com>; 'Jeff Carlson' <jcarlson201240@gmail.com>; 'Pete Ulrich' <peteulrich@aol.com>; sherih24@msn.com; hartness1992@gmail.com; doug@dl-t.com; juanitasthoughts@gmail.com; 'Miller' <ramjr@gmx.com>; ewinghr@yahoo.com Sent: Friday, November 3, 2017 11:48 AM Subject: Estimated views of 5 and 10 foot berms Stephanie, The three pictures in the attachment are being submitted to assist the commissioners in evaluating berm ideas when DCP returns on Monday. We have estimated what a 5' and 10' berm with 8' fir and spruce trees would look like as viewed from a neighbor's home. Thank you, Rich Hartness 1 11/3/2017 ted 5' berm, with 8' ft Most of berm concealed by canal road. Estimated 10' berm, with 8' fir and spruce reel. About half of berm concealed by canal road. 1 11/3/2017 2 Stephanie Frederick From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Randy Clement <clem970@aol.com> Friday, November 03, 2017 2:24 PM Stephanie Frederick; Julie Cozad; Barbara Kirkmeyer; Sean Conway; Steve Moreno; Mike Freeman Fwd: IMG_3277.JPG; IMG_3278.JPG These photos are the sound barrier/landscaping wall samples that we brought to the commissioner meeting on Wed with DCP. We had no intention of completely covering the plant only trying to make it more neighbor friendly. These products would not put any weight on the pipelines that DCP mentioned. The weight of the walls rest completely on the support posts, no matter the height. Theses companies have done walls around other plants with great success to surrounding communities. Thank you, Cindy Clement 18520 Weld Co. Rd. 33 LaSalle, Colo Original Message From: Cindy Clement <clem970@aol.com> To: clem970 <clem970@aol.com> Sent: Fri, Nov 3, 2017 2:12 pm Sent from my iPhone 1 i • - . • r 1 4 _ j . � • . / I •• , t_ '• - • • • - r- . if - a • • dc • 1 i. • J J r • Y 1 .. •4J J J.•J J ••w*r fy p•I. ••••• •• • .. - •. `, +• I, 4.1 74 3' v JJ j"j.. .0, �:4 •: b�•••*4.4• * . ••*•e • 1 1• • ••••'f •*••• •'.y `'1 • • .)F„!A3•'a'•`3 ••••••0 •• •••4 q••••4•••�f'S * I i a 711, t 7117p• • et s •• p•,r * 1 Yb •* * ** *,•• *• 1* •• 1 011•'1* • * 1 •;•R • • • •• ••q••• III* e • • 1*• O lt •f,ef �: .••. •t•"'M .•111 •• • 1'!� 1111 1111.11111•q 1••1 •• •• *••p••••1111•• 111• ••••. M ! r�1`•` `y �, 1.9aw*1g'1r 1> Oro 111 A. 1R ±,;;I ;b!11*Rt/* • **:; 1,1 ;; ;• 1;1 1V t. �. l �^! • 1, •a • q1•1111`411 �1• •'1R9**��'1ti*1c ;; ;;;• p11 ;; ;;:;i;�. 1 A e1 • AI 1t '+111 1, •141111•1•1313 To 3111111 •11••1• •• * 1 ♦ ••11A1 y •• . 1 It 11111,*1.14x111.31111111}4111 w1 y1g13 • 111;1 • '1.111 t• y 1 1 11.1 11 • %. 1 • 11 Al 11 * 1 y 7111 • •11• 11 1, • i.1 y V y 11 A •9Apf1 V 01p• a X 1 1 ,• * II • • � 1 � 9 * 1 1 1 • 1 N. • � • � .• 1 y • 1 • ; • � • � 1 � 1 * ± • 1 • ; ; 1 • • y • • 1 h 11 • 1 s •,,I $,1 • Ie1j11* 1 o?,A 1• 1 ;• 01x `e'1j • `.A *;1 • • !1 , • 1• 11r 0. 7 .•. 1 x} • • ••* 1 x 01tagil •v 1 `1 * 1**�•• A 1 1 1 • V• 1 1 1. 1 1 • , 1 1 !! b ••, V!® y r• b % -, •• •••••,••••/ ,„, a••1X11.11'1111,* V1.111 •*•',• •• • •• A••ro �V•. , 1,0 1 17149.37 1 * • e Q' Y 1 1 7 M 1 1 R *; 1 1 x 1 i i• ;} 1; 7.: 10 a ;'' ; v y y a 9 Y; i•4; •$* .• ® 9• ••• T b 1 g f 1•••• 1. 1 1 0* 1 1 1 V 1 1 1 V y 1! y••• 4• r • • •• 1•• 'A <r 1'494. • „• 91** •;a• s? • ►nt 111 }• 7 • • , �7 �• 01 1 • vs$ , • e 3 1 • •• •* f !•• 1 r* y Y A A * 1 1• A 1 1• A A • Y• • y• 1• A• y.• ** '� 1; • 9`* 1• 1 1 a•** y,• S; y, 1• • a 1 q• n•` q• r 1+ y i' ? * • • ` h 1 • • * • * • a • •' 9 ; • 1 • • * • * • 7 1 • ? • • • • • • • • 1 • • • ; * • 1 4 • 1 Ryes+*1*'1• <•1 • 1 S• 1.1±•* •• •1• :♦ R1 y ••• y•F• 4 • 1 • * N • 7 y • y y a • • • y • * • q •+ 1 • i . • • • • I. e 1 * • • •• A •• y • • • 1 • • • V A ` i • 1 • y 1 • • V• • e _ } * 0• p•• •• V i p 1 1*` 1111•*•R �1 Mt*b••y*;• • • • 1 I V • • • • • Y • • • •! 4• 11 • • • 1 • x • • • • 1 1 t • ` ti64: • + '' * * • . • Y 1.:1 • * • • i h•• 1 P** P••+ 1 a * ' 1 • • • V 1 I Y Dear Commissioners, EXHIBIT ed4 501.1uSQt 7-173--51/z The DCP Landscape proposal does not have a berm tall enough. From Don and my (Terri Dechant) perspective, the current proposed 5' berm will not even come up to the current canal road and ditch bank. With that said the berm will not do any good except for the height of the trees. With planting small trees (8') we will not see the benefit for years. For example: Look at the big tree in the photo below. This photo is taken from our house. The canal road/ditch bank is hiding the bottom 5' or more of the tree. In conclusion: I recommend 15' tall berm, to give us the benefit of the berm with trees. Chain link fencing: The east side chain -link fence is a bad attempt. We recommend replacing the chain -link with the stone wall proposed on the west side. Please deny approval until DCP Midstream brings their landscape proposal up to standards and expectations. Thanks for your time and attention to our neighborhood issues. Terri and Don Dechant 18488 WCR R 33 LaSalle, CO 80645 970.302.1798 terridechant@yahoo.com 1 Photo taken from the Dechant homestead Esther Gesick From: Sent: To: Subject: Barbara Kirkmeyer Sunday, November 5, 2017 6:49 PM rick@aintrightranch.com; Esther Gesick; Commissioners; Tom Parko Jr. Re: DCP elevation??? Esther Please make part of the public record Thanks Barb Have a great day On Nov 5, 2017, at 6:20 PM, "rick@aintrightranch.com" <rick@aintrightranch.com>wrote: As I view DCP's plan, I am not sure how they plan on placing trees and landscaping along WCR 35. The property is in the County and XCEL Right of WAY. I do not believe either XCEL or the County will allow landscaping in this area with power lines overhead.. Rick Krumpeck On 2017-11-04 05:43, Barbara Kirkmeyer wrote: Thank you for your email. We will make it part of the public record. Barb Have a great day On Nov 3, 2017, at 7:38 PM, "rick@aintrightranch.com" <rick@aintrightranch.com>wrote: I have received a diagram of DCP elevation for landscaping purposes. As far as I can tell there is nothing from our property line which is directly east of the proposed expansion. DCP has listed the views from neighbors 1-5. Our home is located at 17313 WCR 38. Our elevation in 4792, the plant main gate is at 4742. As far as I can see they are proposing planting 30-40 foot trees on their property adjacent to ours. When I called for clarification on the diagrams I received, I never received a return call. Please continue to fight for us. We want to believe. Please share this with the other BOCC's. Fred Krumpeck and Rockelle Rissler 17313 WCR 38 Plattevile, CO. 80651 1 • rm MOOS 0 O' tf cp � OCO 9rn cn co s II :in wL ;a p .. _�-GrJ._.- e.,+.,.a...c. `�-!' .. '.,t -?rte-.__ -r�.Y =^.., _.tY�--_•.a. r��ti.u',�r]+ow.±-a.-Li..'7Sv_r-y- --v-. _a'.�a?+, �ry;lu'-�cu�r�'':� '1l my. momP...P.pratyPa Hello