HomeMy WebLinkAbout20173612.tiffSUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
Tuesday, September 5, 2017
A regular meeting of the Weld County Planning Commission was held in the Weld County
Administration Building, Hearing Room, 1150 0 Street, Greeley, Colorado. This meeting was called to
order by Chair, Terry Cross, at 12:30 pm.
Roll Call.
Present: Bruce Sparrow, Jordan Jemiola, Michael Wailes, Terry Cross, Tom Cope.
Absent: Bruce Johnson and Gene Stille.
Also Present: Kim Ogle and Diana Aungst, Department of Planning Services; Hayley Balzano, Department
of Planning Services — Engineering Division; Lauren Light and Ben Frissell, Department of Health; Evan
Pinkham, Public Works; Bob Choate, County Attorney, and Kris Ranslem, Secretary.
• Motion: Approve the August 15, 2017 Weld County Planning Commission minutes, Moved by Tom
Cope, Seconded by Bruce Sparrow. Motion passed unanimously.
CASE NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
PLANNER:
REQUEST:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOCATION:
USR17-0028
JOHN AND KATHLEEN TRAVIS
KIM OGLE
A SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW
PERMIT FOR A HOME BUSINESS (PAINTING, RESTORATION AND
CONSTRUCTION) IN THE A (AGRICULTURAL) ZONE DISTRICT.
LOT A REC EXEMPT RE -4151; PART W2S2E2SW4 SECTION 30, T2N, R68W
OF THE 6TH P.M., WELD COUNTY, COLORADO.
APPROXIMATELY 2025 FEET SOUTH OF CR 16.5 AND APPROXIMATELY
1575 FEET EAST OF CR 1.
Kim Ogle, Planning Services, presented Case USR17-0028, reading the recommendation and
comments into the record. The Department of Planning Services recommends approval of this application
with the attached conditions of approval and development standards.
Commissioner Jemiola asked how a violation was determined as there was no outdoor storage on site and
there are no advertisements on site. Mr. Ogle said that we have received an anonymous complaint from a
referral agency. Mr. Jemiola said that he doesn't see any nearby neighbors that would be impacted by
noise. He added that he is concerned with these zoning violations, especially with home businesses that
don't have any impact visibly on the outside of their property. Mr. Ogle stated that there was an event on or
near this property and one of the emergency responders identified that there was a potential for an
explosion as there was storage of 55 gallon drums of paint and solvent outside.
• Evan Pinkham, Public Works, reported on the existing traffic and access to the site.
Hayley Balzano, Engineering, reported on the drainage conditions for the site.
• Ben Frissell, Environmental Health, reviewed the public water and sanitary sewer requirements, on -
site dust control, and the Waste Handling Plan.
John Travis, 352 CR 16.5, stated that he lives in the residence and owns the business on site.
Commissioner Wailes asked what is being painted on site. Mr. Travis said they paint mostly residential
exterior and interior. He added that have a lot of new construction where they finish and paint doors and
cabinet refinishes. Mr. Wailes asked the applicant if they are the ones who transports the material to and
^from the site. Mr. Travis replied yes.
l .c VVI (M u v"\'‘ O1 -Ns
10 ra3 -7
1
2017-3612
Commissioners Jemiola referred to the hours of operation and asked the applicant if he wanted to make
any changes if they have a busy week and might need to stay later than 4 pm. Mr. Jemiola suggested
changing it to a 24 -hour operation, 7 days a week. Mr. Travis said that he would accept his
recommendation.
The Chair asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for or against this application.
No one wished to speak.
• Motion: Amend Development Standard 3 to reflect a 24 hour, 7 days a week operation, Moved by
Jordan Jemiola. Motion failed due to lack of second motion.
Commissioner Cope said that he feels it is up to the applicant to identify the hours that they feel are
appropriate. He feels that 24/7 seems like it could be a burden to neighbors possibly. Mr. Travis said that
it does happen occasionally when they have a large demand to go until 6 pm. However, he said that
because he is a resident he tries to curb the hours. Mr. Cope clarified if the applicant is requesting an
amendment for the hours of operation to be from 8 am to 6 pm. Mr. Travis replied yes.
Motion: Amend Development Standard 3 to reflect the hours of operation from 8 am to 6 pm, Monday
through Saturday, Moved by Tom Cope, Seconded by Michael Wailes. Motion carried unanimously.
The Chair asked the applicant if they have read through the amended Development Standards and
Conditions of Approval and if they are in agreement with those. The applicant replied that they are in
agreement.
• Motion: Forward Case USR17-0028 to the Board of County Commissioners along with the amended
Conditions of Approval and Development Standards with the Planning Commission's recommendation of
approval, Moved by Tom Cope, Seconded by Bruce Sparrow.
Vote: Motion carried by unanimous roll call vote (summary: Yes = 5).
Yes: Bruce Sparrow, Jordan Jemiola, Michael Wailes, Terry Cross, Tom Cope.
CASE NUMBER: PUDZ17-0004
APPLICANT: UNION FARMS DEVELOPMENT, LLC C/O ANDREW BATSON
PLANNER: DIANA AUNGST
REQUEST: CHANGE OF ZONE FROM THE A (AGRICULTURAL) ZONE DISTRICT TO THE
PUD (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) ZONE DISTRICT FOR TWELVE (12)
RESIDENTIAL LOTS WITH ESTATE ZONE DISTRICT USES WITH 4.6 ACRES
OF OPEN SPACE.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PART W2NW4 SECTION 29, T3N, R68W OF THE 6TH P.M., WELD COUNTY,
COLORADO.
LOCATION: SOUTH OF AND ADJACENT TO HWY 66 AND APPROXIMATELY 660 FEET
EAST OF CR 3.
Diana Aungst, Planning Services, presented Case PUDZ17-0004, reading the recommendation and
comments into the record. Ms. Aungst noted that one letter of objection was received outlining concerns
of a negative environmental impact to the area, septic systems will be detrimental to the water table and
that the drainage report should include the impact of the 12 septic systems and eventual flow. The
Department of Planning Services recommends approval of this application with the attached conditions of
approval and development standards.
• Evan Pinkham, Public Works, reported on the existing traffic and access to the site.
Hayley Balzano, Engineering, reported on the drainage conditions for the site.
Lauren Light, Environmental Health, reviewed the public water and sanitary sewer requirements.
2
Andrew Batson, 12656 Waterside Lane, Longmont, Colorado, stated that he owns Copper Homes, a
small custom homebuilder. He said that there will be a total of 12 home sites as the existing home will be
remodeled. He added that it is compatible use with the surrounding properties.
Mr. Batson said that he has talked with St. Vrain Sanitation and they agreed that it wouldn't be practical to
install a sewer line one and one-half miles to serve the 11 homes. He said that they do want to work with
the neighbors regarding the drainage release that would come out of the proposed detention pond on site.
The Chair asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for or against this
application.
Monica Baldwin, 13738 CR 3, stated that she lives directly south of the property. She said that the land
slopes down and in 2013 flood, water just poured through that field down to their area. She said that they
are concerned about the proposed detention pond adjacent to their property.
Commissioner Sparrow asked to clarify if the concern is that the detention pond would overflow onto the
adjacent property. Ms. Baldwin replied that they are concerned with where the release drain is and the
capacity of that release drain.
Mr. Batson introduced the civil engineer for the project. Patrick Chelin, Matrix Design Group, 1601
Blake Street, Denver, Colorado, stated that he met with the neighbors last week on the site. He said that
their intent is to safely convey the water so it doesn't inundate their property or their homes. He added that
they are working with staff to ensure that they comply with the Weld County Code as well as have a safe
discharge point. Mr. Chelin said that there is no solution yet but they are working towards it.
Commissioner Cope asked at what rate they will be releasing from the detention pond. Mr. Chelin said that
they are working with staff and added that there are a couple design criteria that has evolved since they
originally did their drainage report last year. He added that they will be tweaking that to meet the new urban
drainage criteria but it is roughly 2 cfs.
Commissioner Sparrow asked where it will be released to. Mr. Chelin said that they will have to come up
with some downstream system to take the water safely.
Commissioner Cope asked Mr. Chelin, if in his professional opinion, if the release rate would impact the
neighbor negatively. Mr. Chelan said that it shouldn't and it will be designed not to.
Commissioner Wailes stated that he is concerned with moving something forward that they don't have the
full plan in place. He added that he would like to see this addressed before the Board of County
Commissioner's hearing. Commissioner Sparrow agreed with Mr. Wailes comments. Ms. Aungst added
that there is a Condition of Approval stating that the applicant is required to submit an updated preliminary
drainage report that will be reviewed by the Planning Department Services Engineer prior to approval during
the Final Plan process.
The Chair asked the applicant if they have read through the Conditions of Approval and if they are in
agreement with those. The applicant replied that they are in agreement.
' Motion: Forward Case PUDZ17-0004 to the Board of County Commissioners along with the
Conditions of Approval with the Planning Commission's recommendation of approval, Moved by Jordan
Jemiola, Seconded by Michael Wailes.
Vote: Motion carried by unanimous roll call vote (summary: Yes = 5).
Yes: Bruce Sparrow, Jordan Jemiola, Michael Wailes, Terry Cross, Tom Cope.
The Chair called a recess at 1:26 pm and reconvened the hearing at 1:38 pm.
CASE NUMBER: USR17-0032
APPLICANT: DISCOVERY MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LLC
PLANNER: KIM OGLE
3
REQUEST: A SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW
PERMIT FOR A GREATER THAN 12 -INCH HIGH PRESSURE NATURAL GAS
PIPELINE (20 -INCH) APPROXIMATELY FIFTEEN (15.2) MILES LONG IN THE A
(AGRICULTURAL) ZONE DISTRICT.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THE PROPOSED PIPELINE ENTERS WELD COUNTY IN SECTION 33, T1N,
R67W AND TRAVELS NORTH THROUGH SECTIONS 28, 27, 22, 15 AND 14
TURNING SOUTH THROUGH SECTIONS 23 AND 24, -11 N, R67W THEN EAST
THROUGH SECTIONS 19, 20, 21 THEN TURNING NORTH INTO SECTIONS 21,
16, AND 15 THEN EAST INTO SECTION 14 THEN NORTH INTO SECTION 11,
TIN, R66W OF THE 6TH P.M., WELD COUNTY, COLORADO TERMINATING
AT THE FORT LUPTON GAS PLANT.
LOCATION: GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF CR 12; WEST OF CR 35; NORTH OF CR
2 AND EAST OF CR 17.
• Kim Ogle, Planning Services, stated that five (5) letters were received from surrounding property
owners and one letter and a presentation from an attorney who represents three (3) of the surrounding
property owners requesting that this case be continued. Mr. Ogle said that he has spoken with the applicant
and they have stated that they want to move forward with this case. He added that the concerns that the
surrounding property owners have deals with another component of a land use application and this case is
for the pipeline only. Therefore, staff requested to move forward with this case today.
Commissioner Jemiola asked if this case was adequately noticed. Staff stated that the case was noticed
properly.
Commissioner Jemiola said that he appreciates the request for continuance, however he feels it would be
a disservice to the people who have come here today. Mr. Jemiola said that he would like to hear the case
today. The Planning Commission members agreed to hear the case today.
• Kim Ogle, Planning Services, presented Case USR17-0032, reading the recommendation and
comments into the record. Mr. Ogle noted that, as previously stated, five (5) letters were received from
surrounding property owners. The Department of Planning Services recommends approval of this
application with the attached conditions of approval and development standards.
'" Evan Pinkham, Public Works, reported on the access and right-of-way permits.
• Hayley Balzano, Engineering, reported on the drainage conditions for the site.
• Lauren Light, Environmental Health, reviewed the public water and sanitary sewer requirements, on -
site dust control, and the Waste Handling Plan.
Cory Jordan, Discovery Midstream Partners, 7859 Walnut Hill, Dallas, Texas, stated that they are
proposing a natural gas pipeline for approximately 15 miles in length. The pipeline originates in Adams
County and will then go into their processing plant in Weld County. The gas will then be transported onto
third -party pipelines for delivery to regional markets.
Commissioner Sparrow asked if the gas will be scented. Mr. Jordan replied that it is unscented.
Commissioner Wailes asked what percentage the applicant has in agreements with the landowners. Mr.
Jordan couldn't offer a percentage, however he said that there are only three (3) landowners along the
proposed corridor that haven't signed agreements yet.
• The Chair asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for or against this
application.
Ed Engle, 4233 Falcon Drive, Ft. Lupton, stated that he is the President of Buffalo Ridge HOA and is
concerned with the traffic from the construction of the gas plant. He understands that there will be a lot of
construction traffic with the pipeline that will further impact their community. He added that the traffic will
4
be the greatest when the residents leave and the school busses pick up the children. Mr. Engle said that
they are in opposition to the second gas plant proposed as well as this pipeline. He feels that the gas plant
has adequate pipeline to be run as a facility right now.
• Dawn Pettinger, 17120 Falcon Drive, Ft. Lupton, said that her property adjoins the current gas plant
property. She is concerned that the value of their property will decrease. They feel it is too early to discuss
this pipeline since they are still in the process with Discovery Midstream to mitigate the impact that the
proposed second gas plant will have on their neighborhood and their individual home property values. She
said that they are opposed to this pipeline because of the impact it will have on their property values, noise
that will be generated and the dangers of having an industrial site next to a residential neighborhood.
• Walter Pugliese, 17150 Eagle Street, Ft. Lupton, said that they don't want to shut this pipeline down
but if it is approved then the second phase is a done deal.
• Christy Adams, 4088 Meadow Lark Road, Ft. Lupton, understands that we are talking about the
pipeline today but as everyone has said it is just more than the pipeline. She added that if the pipeline is
approved they will need a plant to process the gas. Ms. Adams said that they do not know yet the impact
of their quality of life from the second gas plant. She asked to delay the decision until such time they can
work with the applicants.
Nancy Pew, 17200 Eagle Street, Ft. Lupton, said that she is concerned as the traffic and noise were
not addressed in Phase 1 of the project. She stated that they are not in favor of this pipeline or the proposed
Phase 2.
• Mark Rients, 4423 Falcon Drive, stated that he is concerned with this much volatility this close to his
home and it could create a catastrophic problem in their neighborhood should there be a natural disaster
event. He said that because it is odorless gas they have no way of being able to know if those pipes are
leaking above ground.
Commissioner Sparrow stated that Weld County will furnish a gas monitor for your home. Mr. Ogle
suggested that they contact Troy Swain, Weld County Oil and Gas Liaison, for more information.
• Michael Desanti, 4180 Falcon Drive, stated that there are 45 residences in the subdivision and only 8
residences were notified so they didn't know about Phase 1. He stated that he is concerned with the
expansion of the pipeline and requested that this be denied.
• Matthew Sura, 7354 Cardinal Lane, Longmont, Colorado, requested denial of this application or delay
the approval until Discovery obtains valid rights -of -way for the pipeline. His clients, Tom Morton, Michael
Ware and Bill Wycoff, feel that they have been misled by the applicants about the scope of this project. He
added that in an effort to obtain signed rights -of -way, the applicants misrepresented its project and failed
to disclose the location of a large compressor facility that is being planned near their properties. Mr. Sura
stated that this will have an undue adverse impact on the existing or future development.
• Michael Ware, 845 CR 19, asked to postpone the approval of the pipeline as there has been a
misrepresentation of the project. He said that after their discussions and negotiations with the applicant an
agreement was completed, however the full extent of the project was not revealed to him. Mr. Ware said
that he feels that development of his property is being jeopardized.
P. Tom Morton, 515 CR 19, said that he is not here to stop the pipeline but wanted the Planning
Commission to know that they were lied to. He said that he asked specific questions if there would be
above ground appurtenances and if the pipeline would be a high pressure pipeline and added that he was
told no to both questions.
' Mr. Jordan said that two separate topics were brought up. He understands their concerns, however
accusing them of fraudulent acts and slandering their name is very serious. Mr. Jordan said that they have
5
held neighborhood meetings for the pipeline in February and March. He added that they held community
meetings for the compressor station in May and June. He said that this pipeline is low pressure until there
is a compressor station attached to it. This pipeline is needed to get the volumes to the processing plant
that is currently permitted and under construction.
The Chair asked the applicant if they have read through the Development Standards and Conditions of
Approval and if they are in agreement with those. The applicant replied that they are in agreement.
Commissioner Jemiola said that we are reviewing the pipeline and not a compressor station. If there
is a compressor station in the future, then they will evaluate the merits and location of that at that time. Mr.
Jemiola said that he believes pipeline infrastructure does help alleviate a lot of traffic on Weld County
Highways, which is a safety issue.
Motion: Forward Case USR17-0032 to the Board of County Commissioners along with the Conditions of
Approval and Development Standards with the Planning Commission's recommendation of approval,
Moved by Jordan Jemiola.
Commissioner Wailes asked Counsel if there is pending legal action regarding the rights -of way of this
pipeline. Bob Choate, County Attorney, said that he is not aware of any, however in Mr. Ware's testimony
he indicated that it may be something that could happen in the future. He added that Planning Commission
is not restricted from moving forward today. Those rights -of -way or easements have to be acquired and
recorded and those reception numbers listed on the final drawing, which is recorded as well. Therefore, it
is treated as a condition of approval that they need to acquire all of the right-of-way. Mr. Choate said that
the decision needs to be based on Section 23-2-480.
Commissioner Cope said that this case is for a pipeline and the compressor station and second plant will
be heard in the future. He said that the people need to be aware that the regulations are followed very
closely by staff. He added that whatever decision is made today, it is only a recommendation to the Board
of County Commissioners, who have the final determination. He said that they should proceed forward with
hearing this case. He added that every time someone felt there is an injustice there would be a delay and
nothing would get done.
Commissioner Cross agreed with Mr. Cope's comments. He said that there were some requests of delaying
approval of this case, however, the Planning Commission doesn't give approval as they give a
recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners.
Michael Wailes seconded the motion.
Vote: Motion carried by unanimous roll call vote (summary: Yes = 5).
Yes: Bruce Sparrow, Jordan Jemiola, Michael Wailes, Terry Cross, Tom Cope.
The Chair called a recess at 3:02 pm and reconvened at 3:14 pm.
'' CASE NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
PLANNER:
REQUEST:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOCATION:
USR17-0035
R 17-0035
NINA MAY WILDER, PATRICIA WILDER DALLAROSA, AND JAMES RICHARD
DALLAROSA
DIANA AUNGST
A SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW
PERMIT FOR A USE PERMITTED AS A USE BY RIGHT, AN ACCESSORY USE,
OR A USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW IN THE COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL
ZONE DISTRICTS (MOTORCYCLE RESTORATION) PROVIDED THAT THE
PROPERTY IS NOT A LOT IN AN APPROVED OR RECORDED SUBDIVISION
PLAT OR LOTS PART OF A MAP OR PLAN FILED PRIOR TO ADOPTION OF
ANY REGULATIONS CONTROLLING SUBDIVISIONS AND 11 CARGO
CONTAINERS IN THE A (AGRICULTURAL) ZONE DISTRICT.
EAST 10 ACRES OF WEST 30 ACRES LOCATED IN S2SW4 SECTION 9, TIN,
R68W OF THE 6TH P.M., WELD COUNTY, COLORADO.
NORTH OF AND ADJACENT TO CR 10 AND APPROXIMATELY 640 FEET
EAST OF CR 5.
6
Diana Aungst, Planning Services, presented Case USR17-0035, reading the recommendation and
comments into the record. Ms. Aungst stated that seven letters of support were submitted by surrounding
property owners. She added that one letter of objection was received from a surrounding property owner
outlining concerns of property values, leaking motorcycles, storage of gasoline and solvents, obstruction of
views, noise and traffic. The Department of Planning Services recommends approval of this application
with the attached conditions of approval and development standards. Ms. Aungst added that the cargo
containers are somewhat visible from the road, however she didn't believe they are outdoor storage and
therefore did not recommend any additional screening for the site.
Evan Pinkham, Public Works, reported on the existing traffic and access to the site.
" Hayley Balzano, Engineering, reported on the drainage conditions for the site.
Lauren Light, Environmental Health, reviewed the public water and sanitary sewer requirements, on -
site dust control, and the Waste Handling Plan.
James Dallarosa, 2181 CR 10, played a video of what it is that he does with the restoration of
motorcycles. Mr. Dallarosa stated that he is devoted to preserving history of motorcycles. He said that
there is essentially no traffic to this site and noise is not a problem as the motorcycles are not operated on
site. Additionally, there is no painting on site so there are no odors or hazardous waste. Mr. Dallarosa
stated that he works on 2 to 5 motorcycles per year. He believes he is compatible with the surrounding
uses in his neighborhood. The use of the storage containers is rather inexpensive to buy rather than build
a new structure. He added that in the future they hope to subdivide their property and do not want to build
a building that would be in the way of dividing their property.
Commissioner Jemiola asked if the motorcycles are restored inside and how the applicant takes care of
leaking solvents or paint. Mr. Dallarosa said that there is no painting done on site. Most of the vehicles he
gets are drained prior to coming to his property. He doesn't use solvents as he uses biodegradable
materials or an ultrasonic cleaner. Any grease or products from cleaning the motorcycles are brought to
Weld Count Hazardous Waste. A lot of his time is spent sourcing information on the computer rather than
actually working on them.
Commissioner Wailes said that it seems like this business is at a hobby level. Mr. Dallarosa said that he
does not make a lot of money from this but it is his livelihood.
The Chair asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for or against this
application.
Mike Powell, 2111 CR 10, stated that there are a lot of false statements in this application. He submitted
pictures of the area into the record. Mr. Powell said that old motorcycles have lead paints and asbestos in
the brake lines and brakes. He is concerned with the big trucks that come to this business, devaluating his
land and his views and decreasing his property values.
Commissioner Jemiola asked if screening is required when there is a complaint from a surrounding property
owner. Ms. Aungst said that the Weld County Code states that outdoor storage shall be screened from
surrounding property owners and public rights -of -way. In this case, Mr. Powell is a surrounding property
owner. She added that although it is not outdoor storage there is no reason that screening cannot be
required on that side. She suggested adding it as Condition of Approval 1.C if the Planning Commission
wants to add it.
Commissioner Wailes referred to the pictures submitted and didn't see any of the containers in the pictures.
Mr. Powell said the pictures show the flooding or draining from all the properties in the area. He said that
the rust from the containers are going everywhere.
7
Andy Call, 2101 CR 10, said that he just bought property adjacent to the applicant's property and they
don't hear any noise or see any parking along the roadway. He added that he didn't even know the applicant
operated this business until the he came to visit with him about this case.
Marvin Bowers, 4260 CR 5, stated that his property backs up to the applicant's property on the north
side. He said that his property gets all of the drainage in the area and has never seen any contamination.
Mr. Bowers said that he has been all over the applicant's property and there are no batteries or solvents
leaking. He added that the cargo containers are spotless. He said all of this started with the lot lines being
in the wrong place.
' The Chair referred to the potential condition of approval regarding screening. Commissioner Wailes
suggested painting the containers all one color and then they could be used as screening for the site.
Commissioner Cope said that he is not opposed to utilizing cargo containers as screening as they are less
obtrusive than a house.
Ms. Aungst suggested adding a Condition of Approval 1.6.11 to read "The map shall delineate the
landscaping and/or screening".
The Chair asked the applicant if they have read through the amended Development Standards and
Conditions of Approval and if they are in agreement with those. The applicant replied that they are in
agreement.
Motion: Add Condition of Approval 1.6.11 as stated by staff, Moved by Jordan Jemiola, Seconded by
Tom Cope. Motion carried unanimously.
Motion: Forward Case USR17-0035 to the Board of County Commissioners along with the amended
Conditions of Approval and Development Standards with the Planning Commission's recommendation of
approval, Moved by Jordan Jemiola, Seconded by Michael Wailes.
Vote: Motion carried by unanimous roll call vote (summary: Yes = 5).
Yes: Bruce Sparrow, Jordan Jemiola, Michael Wailes, Terry Cross, Tom Cope.
The Chair asked the public if there were other items of business that they would like to discuss. No one
wished to speak.
The Chair asked the Planning Commission members if there was any new business to discuss. No one
wished to speak.
Meeting adjourned at 4:07 pm.
Respectfully submitted,
Kristine Ranslem
Secretary
8
Hello