HomeMy WebLinkAbout20183030.tiff INVENTORY OF ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION
Case Number: PUDZ18-0001
Owners : Brett E. & Tammy L. Russell
K5 Enterprises , LLC clo Randy Kneebone
Colson , Inc. c/o Mark Bowman
Theresa Rizzo Brooks
Brian & Antonella Hem pelmann
Representative : Colson , Inc. c/o Mark Bowman
Submitted or Prepared
Prior to At
Hearing Hearing
1 SPO Letter - Terrance & Joan Rhodes - dated 05/02/2018 (SPO within 500 feet) X
2 SPO Letter - Addison & Beatrice Lease - dated 05/08/2018 (SPO within 500 feet ) X
3 SPO Letter - Everette & Linda McCully - dated 05/08/2018 ( SPO outside 500 feet ) X
4 SPO Letter - Barbara Nelson - dated 05/22/2018 (SPO within 500 feet ) X
5 SPO Letter - Stanley & Cynthia Stegall - dated 06/05/2018 ( SPO within 500 feet) X
I hereby certify that the 5 items identified herein were submitted to the Department of Planning Services at
or prior to the scheduled Board of County Commissioners hearing .
ah4/e/g/
Michael Hall , Planner
August 16 , 2018
EXHIBIT
. 111
1 . 1
May2, 2018 RFCF ! vtD
Weld County Department ofPlanning Services MAY 0 9 2018
l5 $ 5 N. 17 Ave. Weld County Planning Department
Greeley, CO 80631 GREELEY OFFICE
Case Number: PUDZIS-0001
Amended PUD Change of Zone of Longs Peak Estates .
Dear Sirs :
Per the Application ��� i�w NotificatIon Card that we received, we are writing to comment
on the proposed zoning amendment.
We are very much opposed to granting of this zoning change and urge the Weld County
Planning Services to deny the application. Below is a summary of the reasons for our
opposition.
• As residents of 4590 Peakview for the last 30 years, we were apprised of the project
from its onset by Propp Realty and agreed to the current plat for five homes in the
Dawn Court access and two homes on the Avery Court access. The zone change
application could potentially double the number of houses allowable from seven to 14 .
• The application is vague in its description of the type of home that would be built. It
requests the addition of "guest homes or secondary homes" . It goes on to speculate that
these would be for "elderly parents" . It seems, in cur opinion pretentious of the writers
of this application to guess how these second homes would ultimately be used. Could
there be a veiled agenda eventually sub-divide and sell the second home?
• The application under Component Two — Service Provision impacts, it states
incorrectly in items 5 ,6, and 11 that traffic impact would be minimal and a study would
not be required. We contend that is not accurate with the potential addition of 10
homes to the Dawn Court location.
o The application incorrectly states there are nine homes accessed by Peakview
Road. There are in fact 14 homes and properties that are accessed by Peakview;
two of which are commercial properties with traffic that is in addition to
residential traffic.
o During periods of inclement weather the Peakview gravel road is already taxed
to its maximum use ,
o The intersection of Peakview and Dawn Court is not controlled and based on the
current construction traffic not stopping for on coming vehicles, the safety
considerations would increase dramatically .
• Based on the five lots accessed by Peakview Road and Dawn Court being in
Geological Hazard Area, it would seem unwise to compound the concentration of
family dwellings in this area.
We ask the Weld County Planning Services to deny the application. The original concept of
the five homes on Dawn Court and two on every court should be maintained.
Please contact us if you have any questions or would like to discuss farther.
Sincerel a ja... � ciet,..._
if
/A Piker
Terry Joan Rhodes
45911 Peakview Read
Erie, CO 80516
EXHIBIT
� 2
RR:Ft- win
digs , PUMZ it- coo , MAY082 018
Weld Cathay rid ,
fj
•
GREELEY 0Fzdieri'ti1.e
�J�id/ 0wy
fedek 044./e/ ,4009e/C ke4.01/4) ;icy
4612 s /JP's,/ e / 970 et IC4- ,02 ) / A / 1/444,9itec
in
a/0V / did_ idetio-A 7 Cie',/,' fri et/LI min Alto*"
kethel 062 line 4/.0%;) /9, see
At:, A/yea O )//itc'.tP ageete-de U/to.2P_ 9Lewi✓f1
aide 9 "I‘e 40 4 >tir /Joe ae o/d:mare-it iL
je
/ye .::96 di) cite 46414ilar 0119 adtill asise-er 64/474#7
Ctise es /cr'rsiati nce. 0-1o00v�s Aciii . 1:4/400/ ors
Grci9S aNe �vGLv" �401/.eF 71/110.:v .�in�
{ #000 e7Sc. LIU)/ do n141 se 1/25/ /floe
0>z aigi-V zerdaS,de "ele, edik..0 -4 9 75-Cer egostid
/011U(07 acid/elect ?dr .efi'et
G(� is -e d6a',v ae.4701 7CO /40;7anirePI �.
ifle rczet 9.e q ti )o✓s o us dad ea c c
ife_iloarsoi5770,1 •-sPe at -veal e oeditrftiothi aate
712,efri co 71;47 arc e e nosccilf •v
i�7f1ini.7'4ia ee�� " /Dul -r0 �/���E'f�
W‘" Ai�li-r/J� d �yf's7�{'�i AS/ IT dos( � � .
km /ray ',rte SLrre 70 Je /p9�i vq e,09 �PG�
J
,76Ce 7ge SC/ ar oe,ovariekeoloe ;74/
kIt ale /96/62041? sir>ti ,9wy �,P, W
f �
49,
as 7 itordeopo toyistate
72. Perc)/ lareeepl L-909,
4Oz 001-07x9 e etch O1,A/ Cniredr4,,ed je>/,
0.2 7/kg/;�� derz «e �oa, '� time e/�;I� v i/lO,�? E� ic-C-C7ror d,e /JO/wPac geese
1/44 lige 14 Aker/
dYcllasar/ c� 00044szrtP
S0& -c4n6 ~ 3 5 /S-
Everette & Linda McCully EXHIBIT
4772 Peakview St.
Erie, Co . 80516 3 Rpri,
emccully@mesanetworks .net
Weld Cour AY:. 8 X618
Weld County Department of Planning Services EELS , rrc.
17th .A � �
1555 I.
Greeley, Ca 80631
Subject: Case # PUD 18 - 0001
This development has directly affected our lives because 5 of the current 7 lots are accessed off of our street,
Peakview. There is currently one house under construction in the section accessed via Peakview St . The
construction traffic on our gravel road is already kicking up a lot of dust as their trucks and pickups go up and
down at fairly high speed. This makes it unsafe for anyone walking on our road . We have people the go
walking for exercise, both adults and children. One problem is because in the 45 years that I have been here the
road has narrowed by about 4 feet due to the grader grooming the ditch on both sides thus slowly narrowing the
road. This is making it more difficult for cars and trucks to meet, and leaves little room to walk safely, Also
the road about a quarter of a mile each side to the turn that goes west from Peakview St. to the new
development become very muddy if we have much moisture . The speed limit needs to be lowered on Peakview
to 20 mph to keep it safe, and it also it would reduce the dust in the air. A. major upgrade to Peakview St would
be necessary to handle the added traffic. These problems are only a glimpse of what is to come when you add a
minimum of 10 cars racing up and down Peak-view in a hurry to get on with their lives or getting home to
unwind. If you approve more houses it would only enlarge the problems and stress on all the families, because
of the increase in homes . It would more than double the traffic, and that would not include guests or deliveries ,
This upgrade to Peakview should be paid entirely by the new development, and not the current owners along
Peakview. In fact all of the access to the entire new development should have come off of Road 12 and not off
of our road.
Now, to address the request for two homes on each lot. There are several concerns I have . The first one is that
the added traffic is causing a safety problem due to the added traffic and the speed of that traffic . . People, that
have live quite a while on Peakview, hold our speed down for safety and for reduced dust in the air.
Next, the problem of the septic systems . It is not known if the lots will have adequate percolation for that
adequate leach fields for two homes on these lots . We have bentonite clay in this area, and the percolation rate
is not very good. Also the overall drainage of the whole development needs to be assessed to make sure that it
does not cause stagnant pond(s) to form and thus bread mosquitoes . Ne'xt is the mail delivery needs to be
straightened out. The house on the north end that is under construction has put a mailbox on Road 12 near the
road into it. The contractor put a group mailbox for eight on Peakview near the north end of the street.
Currently the mail truck comes down the street delivering to each person' s mailbox .
I would like to be notified about to the time and location of any hearing on this case.
N 2210,, dol Lig ty trie7
Everette R McCully Linda M McCully ully
Amended Change of Zone Longs Peak Estates
EXHIBIT
To : Weld County Department of Planning Services
Re : P U DZ18-BB1-Amend to change zoning of Longs Peak Estates to allow 2 homes per lot in the PUD .
D .
I find it absolutely unacceptable to change the zoning of Longs Peak Estates to allow 2 homes per each 3-
4 acre lot. The construction traffic for the building of one home has torn up the dirt surface of Peakview
Street repeatedly and endangered children & animals . This is the only access for we 12 Peakview
residents, the 1.0 proposed homes in the development, and their construction/service traffic. Properties
on Peakview are zoned agricultural with a mountain view on which much of their quiet rural value is based
for current and future residents. Why would someone buy rural property and turn it into a suburb? My
property at 4701 Peakview borders the entire Lot 5 and my view and could be all or partially obstructed
by homes on lots 3 & 4 as well. Thank you for your consideration .
Os.tar (Cr\ifiVilt.
Barbara R Nelson, property owner
4701 Peakview St
Erie, Colorado 80516
RECF
MAY 22 2010
ter P la n n y ����� I
.. ,
OFFICE
EXHIBIT
RFCPr RI
APPLICATION REVIEW OBJECTIONS
JUN 05 20t6
PUDZ1B-0001 LONGS PEAK ESTATES
Weld County i
GREELEY OFFILd .
To Whom It May Concern,
We object fully and unconditionally to any changes for development plans in the area
Known as Longs Peak Estates . We agreed to the original plans with the implied promise that
No further reduction of lot size would be asked for or granted .
This area is a rural one, with abundant wildlife, quiet, lack of crime, and is a 'country' kind of
Lifestyle . Allowing the developer to reduce the lot size to accommodate more homes/higher
Density housing is not what we want, nor what we agreed to . His plans would greatly impact the
Quality of our lifestyle and the value of our properties.
We understand that the developer now wants to make more money by putting in higher density
Housing, but that is just not in keeping with the overall community out here . Already, the increased
Traffic, noise, disruption of the irrigation ditches and trespassing, along with killing of wildlife
Has impacted us all greatly, and we don' t want any more than we already agreed to have .
Kindly help us to stop the urban sprawl that is taking over the front range communities .
Colorado in general , and Weld County specifically, have always been known for resistance to
Decimation of the rural areas for the sake of developer profits, and we would ask that you refuse
Their application for changes .
Thank you,
Chris and Cyndee Stegall/2606 CR 12, Erie, CO 80516/720-971-1630 or 720-366-6305
Hello