The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20180623.tiffDelivered Via Email: egesick(weldgov.com April 13, 2018 Weld County Board of Commissioners Attn: Esther Gesick Clerk to the Board P.O. Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 RECEIVED APR 2 3 2018 WELD COUNTY COMMISSIONERS RE: Request for Comments and Recommendations on the Red Barn Subdivision Final Plat in the Town of Mead. Dear Ms. Gesick: The Town of Mead has receivied a request for a Preliminary/Final Plat to be considered simultaneously with the Red Barn Annexation to the Town of Mead. This property is located on approximately 200 acres, west of WCR 13 and South of WCR 32. The requested 13 lot residential subdivision contains six 1 acre lots and seven 1/2 acre lots along the northern and eastern borders of the property. The middle 172 acres are reserved as an outlot for later development. The zoning of the property will be for RSF-4 single-family residential uses. The purpose of this referral is to obtain the comments and recommendations of various governmental agencies and service providers as to the appropriateness of the Preliminary/Final Plat. Your comments are welcome and will assist the staff and Board of Trustees in their review of the proposal. We ask that your comments reach us no later than April 25. The complete application and associated drawings and materials files are located in the following DropBox folder. To access the files, left click on the following URL: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/s5jywqldefrnpyy/AADkrYc LocoFIM0uCjGDMIHa?d1=0 We ask that you forward your response by email directly to Chris Kennedy, Mead Planning Director, at: ckennedy(cf),townofinead,org, or, by letter to Chris Kennedy, Mead Planning Director, P.O. Box 626, Mead, CO 80542. Thank you for your cooperation and assistance. Very truly yours, 61171 Mary E. Strutt Town Clerk Town of Mead • 441 Third Street • P.O. Box 6Z6 • Mead, Colorado 80542-0626 • 970-535-4477 • www.townofinea .or CAS�} PL(MMITP) CM( MW/M-M ) 2018-66 F Ro-iS w CEP/b-IIER), mks' O4 30 p 04-23- t REFERRAL REQUEST TODAY'S DATE: April 13, 2018 PROJECT NAME: Red Barn Subdivision - Preliminary/Final Plat PROJECT FILE NO: PROJECT TYPE: Preliminary/Final Plat COMMENTS DUE BY: April 25, 2018 PLANNER: Chris Kennedy EMAIL: ckennedy(")a,townofinead.org Dear Referral Organization or Agency: Information on the proposal in the Town of Mead referenced above is enclosed for your review and comments. O We have no objections to this proposal. ❑ Please note the following concerns: O See attached letter for comments regarding this proposal. Organization or Agency Name Your Name Signature Date Phone PLEASE RETURN TO: Town of Mead, Planning Department PO Box 626 - 441 3' Street Mead, CO 80542 20171129 Referral Request.wpd 11/29/17 (12:20 pm) Delivered Via Email: egesick@weldgov.com April 13, 2018 Weld County Board of Commissioners Attn: Esther Gesick Clerk to the Board P.O. Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 RECEIVED APR 19 2018 WELD COUNTY COMMISSIONERS RE: Request for Comments and Recommendations on the Red Barn Subdivision Final Plat in the Town of Mead. Dear Ms. Gesick: The Town of Mead has receivied a request for a Preliminary/Final Plat to be considered simultaneously with the Red Barn Annexation to the Town of Mead. This property is located on approximately 200 acres, west of WCR 13 and South of WCR 32. The requested 13 lot residential subdivision contains six 1 acre lots and seven 1/2 acre lots along the northern and eastern borders of the property. The middle 172 acres are reserved as an outlot for later development. The zoning of the property will be for RSF-4 single-family residential uses. The purpose of this referral is to obtain the comments and recommendations of various governmental agencies and service providers as to the appropriateness of the Preliminary/Final Plat. Your comments are welcome and will assist the staff and Board of Trustees in their review of the proposal. We ask that your comments reach us no later than April 25. The complete application and associated drawings and materials files are located in the following DropBox folder. To access the files, left click on the following URL: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/s5jywqldefrnpyy/AADkrYc LocoFIMOuCjGDMIHa?d1=0 We ask that you forward your response by email directly to Chris Kennedy, Mead Planning Director, at: ckennedy@townofinead.org, or, by letter to Chris Kennedy, Mead Planning Director, P.O. Box 626, Mead, CO 80542. Thank you for your cooperation and assistance. Very truly yours, Mary E. Strutt Town Clerk Town of Mead • 441 Third Street • P. O. Box 626 • Mead, Colorado 80542-0626 • 970-535-4477 • www.townofmead.org R OIie Fv;ew O L1 /03/18" mac: SOC RS), PL CM m PTO, PwCE.P/cN/ER), CCMW/mM/TP).rv,cs.es 0'1 / Iq/I$' Pore --0006)3 REFERRAL REQUEST TODAY'S DATE: April 13, 2018 PROJECT NAME: Red Barn Subdivision - Preliminary/Final Plat PROJECT FILE NO: PROJECT TYPE: Preliminary/Final Plat COMMENTS DUE BY: April 25, 2018 PLANNER: Chris Kennedy EMAIL: ckennedyAtownofinead.orq Dear Referral Organization or Agency: Information on the proposal in the Town of Mead referenced above is enclosed for your review and comments. ❑ We have no objections to this proposal. ❑ Please note the following concerns: ❑ See attached letter for comments regarding this proposal. Organization or Agency Name Your Name Signature Date Phone PLEASE RETURN TO: Town of Mead, Planning Department PO Box 626 - 441 3rd Street Mead, CO 80542 20171129 Referral Request.wpd 11/29/17 (12:20 pm) Eat F CLJMM ISMS NT ENE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS COIRETONCN IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS • ETON Ts ExcERTEMs I] T"ROusE 4s AFFECT PARCEL ATE mark THE FoLLovoNLI NOTICES PURSUANT To TAN us 5,3 LixisER6ROUND FACILITIES... RAE,' FILED rani THE CLERK MID RECoRDER TERSE sTAFENENTS ARS GENERAL END DO NOT LE -ENDED SL IL IAFESETs EA., 51 USTI RING I. FLIKELYINC J05 n. FES RUSE ACNE -CUTE, ETC, AA', V,EL LELLosuAL ARTA TAFFECES PARCEL AI ALTA/AGSM LAND TITLE SURVEY PORTIONS OF' NORTH EAST % SECTION 24, T3N, R66W OF THE SIXTH P.M., COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO VICINITY MAP 1" = 1000' SECTION 23 SITE STATE HWY tiff PARCEL!, LEGAL DEBCBIPTIOR .0 RECORDED EXEMPTION 120T24 -0t HE-x1/-LWB BUN, PART OF THE HST CHART ER OI SEC HON 14 TOWNSHIP 3 NOR H RANGE 68 WEST Ur THE GIN PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN MONTY OF WELD STATE 01c.O n.. BEGINNING AT THE NE CORNER OF SECTION 24. A 2KALUMINUM CAP IN A RANGE SOX LOCATED N THE III ERSECTION 04 W., CR 13 O CR 32. THENCE 5 89'1536' W ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SECTION 24. A DISTANCE OF ,85146' TO THE NE CORNER OF _OT C OF RECORDED EXEMPTION 1207-24-01AE-X171JW6 THENCE S 00,19.56.E ALONG THE EAST LINE O4 SAID LOT G A DISTANCE OF 43013'0 IHF SE CORNER OF LOT C. LINE OF LOT C A DISTANCE OF 26962"0 Thc SW THENCE 500'0433' E ALONG 'TIeH FAST NF OF OT 6 O RECOH9E0 EXEMPTION ''20]-24L CORNER x17.TM8oA DISTANCE OF 156 5'TO-LE CORNER OF SAC, .07 6. RENO: S 89'1 /27- W A_ONG'nE SOPH LNE C, LO' R A DISTANCE OF 526 32 TO 'HE SW CORNER 31 LOT 6. A POIN I ON I, WEST NE OF THE NE, OF SECTION 24 THENCE S 013.0394.E ALONG THE WEST LINE OF NE'/• SECTION 24 A DISTANCE OF 206546' TO THE TO THE CENTER 9UARTER OF SECTION M.. CAP ON A K H[BAR NC: N 85,218 E ALONG IA SOU, L NF 01 1„ Hr r.01 SE.ION 24A 015 ANCI OF 2. 45 TO He SW CORNER Or I0 A Di RECORDED EXEMPTION 207-24-01HE1478 HENCL N 00'23-20' E A DISTANCE OF 308 22' 10 1 HE NW CORNER OF SAID _01 A. AL ONG THE NORTH LNL 01 LOT A A DISTANCE OF 354.16TO NE CORNER 04 LOT A, A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THE NE% SECTION 24 HENCE N 00°0000' W A DISTANCE OF 86018 ALONG THE EAST.THE OF THE NE, SECTION 24 10 I, SE CORNER OF LOT B RECORDED EXEMPTION 1207-246, RECX-160168 FENCE N 69"35'3" w AL ONG THE SOUTH L NE OF SAO LOT 9. A DISTANCE OF 211955' TO The SW CORNER OF LOT 6 THENCE N 00.00,4E _. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF I OT B TO THE NW CORNER OF LOT B A DISTANCE OF 3/611 THENCE 94-0375' E A ac", WEST 1 NF OF 1 UT A RECORDED EXEMPTION ,207-240, aEcx.,6a66 To THE x00 CORNER OF OT A. 375 43 LNCpN5 89'3556' E ALONG THE NORTH LINE 01 SAID LOT A A DISTANCE 0! 28944 '0 NL CORNER 04 .0T A A PON ON I, LAS I NE 0I THE NE, SECTION 24, THENCEN 00'0000' E ALONG'HE LAST LINE 01 SAID SEC I ION 24 A DISTANCE OF /R'4' TO I HE NE CORNTJ2 OF SECTION 24 WHICH IS THE PON I OF BEGINNING, HAVING AN AREA OF 6282318.2 4 SQUARE FEET 144 224r ACRES SURVEYOR'S NOTES. PARCEL B LEGAL DESCRIPTION. • F SLATE, EROPFR, . THE F cor WAND AREA DESI,ATED AS ZONE A' N ALAORDAR, ,SULE SURFACE LTIL TV APPILETELIANCES HAVE BTUs TX,. 0.G THE AK,. OE CARL. NANSENS LOW,. ARE NIAL, CR UPI. BEFORE LOMIELALING ANY txCAVVION THE uTiLITIES SHOuLD6L HELD LS FluITEI SAVO ELEVATION .LT s1 ACTION BASTE JP, ANT DEFECT AIS SERV, AT COMMENCES ki LES FLATS FR. inL JAIL Of AL WTI IL IL/CILLX SMILAX HEAL, SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION CERTIFICATION DEFINED IU PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR IN I HE PRACTICE 01 LAND SURVEYING CONS IIIUT LS AN SESSION OF PROFESSIONAL OPINION REGARDING THOSE I ACIS GI FINDINGS WIACTT ARE THE SUBJECT OF THE CERTIFICATION AND DOES NOT CONS IITUIE AEXPRESSED OR IMPLIED THIS DOCUMFN'MAY BI1 MADE AND DI1 STRIBUTED TOOT HER PARTIES R REFERENCE AURPOSES AND REVIEW HOWEVER. ONLY ERIN IS OT HIS SURVEY BEARING ORIGINAL SIGNAL URE AND WEl SEAL BY THE SURVEYOR NAMED EREON SHALL SE CONSIDERED VALID CERTIFIED DOCUMENTS LOT D RECORDED EXENIP ION 12C/-24-14-RECX1TL09T EILGINNING CORNER OI SEC ION 24 13 BW Of NLb,HWE,M IN WE, COON IY a ALUMINUM CAP IN A RANGE BOX LOCATED N THE CENTER OF WEI 0 CR O THENCE S 69"12'26' W A DISTANCE OF 2650.51' AI ONG THE NORTH I INF OF THE SE 02 SAID SECTION 24 TO THE CENTER/, OF SECTION 24, THE NCI: 50026'24'EALO G H WEST LINE O4 THE SE/,, AUSANCE 01 TOTFE SW CORNER 01 AID 10TO THENCE N 6,1O6'FADISTANCE 041901.46' 10 THE SW CORNER O4 LOT A RECORDED EXEMPTION 1201-24-04-RECX17.c097. THENCE N 0.20.' VV A DISTANCE OF 546 36' THENCE N 09`011'50"E A DISTANCE OE 53044' THENCE S 00'03'06" E A DISTANCE OF 107 57'. THENCE 09°06'27' E A DISTANCE OF 210 TO TO A POINT ON THE EAST L LNE OF THE SF'/, HENCE N 00'00'03" W A_ONG SAID LS I LINE A DISTANCE OF 500 36 10 I HE EA CORNER. WHICH IS THE POIN OF BEGINNING. LAVING AN AREA OF 2147317 n • SOUARF FEET. 49 J. • ACRES No I `7-1095 CHECK,B/ OM, SHEET 1/4 PROJECT LOCH I EL) AT SW ER OF THE INTERSECT:ON OF WCRL3 & WCR32, LOCATE) IN THE F'/• or SECTION 24, T3N, R68W, 6TH M, COUNTY OF WELL), STATE OF COLOHAUO ANDREW BATSON ARB 2011, LLC Engineering Surveying 10269 Tom1cOf Road Franktown, CO. 80116 303 660-0169 ALTA/ACS_VI LAND TITLE SURVEY PORTIONS OF NORTH EAST '/ SECTION 24, T3N, R66W OF THE SIXTH P.M., COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO IN SURVEYOR'S NOTES: LOT D I- OHICUIURAI N E% NORTH %2, NORTH EAST 1/4 SECTION 24, SURVEYORS CERTIFICATION. w fasemew ��iyni nu, u�voe It41,0f 16, SIT xowH. ..ROAD, .weer er. ncc ary �. Hi- a auc nccuu v�, �.s_ry ssnus.,H,r '..n i u'n "'" 4",],„ n �tn9.s SHEET ARB 2011, LLC ANDREW BATSON 214 d Engineering Surveying 10269 Tomichi Road Frank town, CO. 60116 303 660-2169 ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY PORTIONS OF NORTH EAST % SECTION 24, T3N, R6BW OF THE SIXTH P.M., COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO 9 SURVEYORS NOTES: NFU SURVEY AR, 8,45 AF -88 LC, FIRSI DISLOVESEU SUN LIMA AND ULU MA LA, SCAN RISEN I:PON/As IN El in INNEN,. BI DENAILNAFD ELLA ETC TI NAAFIS, ANL FA ul LOT D z._NOLENI�N, LOTS LESSENS / N E% xn 48 EC DRONS 2,0 SOUTH 1/2, NORTH EAST 1/ SECTION 24, SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION. SEA, OF COLORAJO MALL, DER IF 1.1 I HIS ALAI AAS MADE BY ME OR UNDER. t,48 SuPERL ISION AND ALE MONUMENTS SHOAN T-EREON ADELLALLE EXLST AND -HIS PONT TREE, .IL SUNNILY LICENSED LANG, SUR-ANCOR COI OLLNDO NO 4440 SONI[NION LASN ON! Mrry ,INTIESTI LET,. RN INlfinq _ `JU U CELENKLIENT8 Don SHEET 3/4 LCTA i ae ncNu �rvl I. 'I�E "N''Nl�nu eor iLED LX 24 II NO I A PAR 1 RVW 4 vIWL!OARLM,L,"' 17422.5 BOON GAGE X ASS PEVA CI I OCA IEO AT SW CORNER OF THEINTERSECTION OF WCRI F J 3 C l, OC EJ IN IDS LIS OF SECTION 2n, 13N R68W, 6111 PM, COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO ANDREW BATSON ARB 2011, LLC 80LAD DA ALUM CAP ES :684/ IN RANGE BOX Engineeriri Surveying 10269 Tomichi Road Franktown, CO. 80116 303 660-8109 J ALTA/ACSM LANI) TITLE SURVEY PORTIONS OF SOUTH EAST % SECTION 24, T3N, R6BW OF THE SIXTII P.M., COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO SURVEYOR'S NOTES: v\ REYNOLDS 24-24 i W.() PA, ER Nr/ SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION LOTB t GROSS ACRES 09 t NI: I ACRES RECOHOLI, EXEMPTION / .wlnsetml NORTH '/2, SOUTH EAST 1/ SECTION 24, tilIPE RVISION :VC., MONUMENTS SIIOAN ..HEON ACTUA, I EXIST AND THIS PLAT -Mu, COL ORADO 4440 LEDGEND N ,CORDEI,LXEM 'ION AV0LEt,& 1 IW UR.hhLMLHI Ray ,04,4015 HEC EX 120,2.0 ner APART �--szn-liT ne su =ve e3MI srL w. ,vl 1 /-1 U9S LmA SHEET 4/4__ ... I • OUNI, r, CAP PROJECT LOCATED AT SW CORNLR OE IH WISLCIION RI3 tL wCI412, IN ITU IN I UL Oh OF SECTION 14, TTN, P.W, EDI PM, COUNTY OF W EI 0, STATE OF COLORADO ANDREW BATSON ARB 2011, LLC LS •ptla, IN RANGE BOX Engineering Surveying 10269 Tom,ch, Road Franktown, CO. 80116 303 660-8169 WELD COUNTY COLORADO LAND RECORDS AFFIDAVIT OF INTERESTED LAND OWNERS SURFACE ESTATE 3/9/2018 10:44:11 AM THE UNDERSIGNED, States that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names, addresses, and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners of the property (the surface estate) within 500 feet of the property being considered. This list was compiled utilizing the records of the Weld County Assessor available on the Weld County Internet Mapping site, http://www.co.weld.co.us, and has not been modified from the original. The list compiled for the records of the Weld County Assessor was assembled within thirty days of the applications submission date. Signature Date Property Owners Within 300 ft of Parcel # 120724100046 Account Parcel Owner Mailing Address R0281387 120713000027 UNITED POWER INC PO BOX 929 BRIGHTON, CO 806010929 R0281487 120713000076 PUBLIC SERVICE CO OF COLO TAX SERVICE DEPARTMENT PO BOX 1979 DENVER, CO 802011979 R1025602 120724000004 BENSON FARMS LIMITED LIABILITY CO C/O BILL WOODS 530 HOLYOKE ST FORT COLLINS, CO 805257022 R1024902 120724000005 RBM HOLDINGS LLC PO BOX 675 LONGMONT, CO 805020675 R1025202 120724000008 POST ROCK LLC C/O CHRISTOPHER J WAGNER 13600 COUNTY ROAD 11 LONGMONT, CO 805049656 R8948319 120724100041 COPPER HOMES LIMITED 12656 WATERSIDE LN LONGMONT, CO 805045252 R8948320 120724100042 COPPER HOMES LIMITED 12656 WATERSIDE LN LONGMONT, CO 805045252 R8949978 120724100043 CANTU DIANA R8949978 120724100043 CANTU DANNY 5492 COUNTY ROAD 32 LONGMONT, CO 805049665 Parcels: 18 Owner Records: 20 Page 1 of 4 WELD COUNTY COLORADO LAND RECORDS AFFIDAVIT OF INTERESTED LAND OWNERS SURFACE ESTATE 3/9/2018 10:44:11 AM THE UNDERSIGNED, States that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names, addresses, and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners of the property (the surface estate) within 500 feet of the property being considered. This list was compiled utilizing the records of the Weld County Assessor available on the Weld County Internet Mapping site, http://www.co.weld.co.us, and has not been modified from the original. The list compiled for the records of the Weld County Assessor was assembled within thirty days of the applications submission date. Property Owners Within 300 ft of Parcel # 120724100046 Signature Date Account Parcel Owner Mailing Address R8949979 120724100044 CHECKETTS SHERILYN R8949979 120724100044 CHECKETTS COLTON 16212 GINGER AVE MEAD, CO 805426018 R8949980 120724100045 COPPER HOMES LIMITED 12620 WATERSIDE LANE LONGMONT, CO 80504 R8949981 120724100046 13-32 DEVELOPMENT LLC 1351 RED ASH LN BOULDER, CO 803039547 R8949339 120724200018 RAM LAND CO LLC 103 BLUE HERON CT MEAD, CO 805428803 R8951853 120724400021 13-32 DEVELOPMENT LLC 1351 RED ASH LN BOULDER, CO 803039547 R1030602 120918000018 SEKICH PROPERTIES LLC 6769 COUNTY ROAD 32 PLATTEVILLE, CO 806519000 R8072900 120919000052 WEBBER ELIZABETH P 14514 COUNTY ROAD 13 PLATTEVILLE, CO 806519013 R4789207 120919200001 SEKICH RODNEY A PO BOX 309 MEAD, CO 805420309 Parcels: 18 Owner Records: 20 Page 2 of 4 WELD COUNTY COLORADO LAND RECORDS AFFIDAVIT OF INTERESTED LAND OWNERS SURFACE ESTATE 3/9/2018 10:44:11 AM THE UNDERSIGNED, States that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names, addresses, and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners of the property (the surface estate) within 500 feet of the property being considered. This list was compiled utilizing the records of the Weld County Assessor available on the Weld County Internet Mapping site, http://www.co.weld.co.us, and has not been modified from the original. The list compiled for the records of the Weld County Assessor was assembled within thirty days of the applications submission date. Signature Date Property Owners Within 300 ft of Parcel # 120724100046 Account Parcel Owner Mailing Address R4789307 120919200002 FREDON LLC PO BOX 443 MEAD, CO 805420443 R0062088 120919200002 WESTERN SUGAR COOPERATIVE 7555 E HAMPDEN AVE STE 520 DENVER, CO 802314830 Parcels: 18 Owner Records: 20 Page 3 of 4 WELD COUNTY COLORADO LAND RECORDS AFFIDAVIT OF INTERESTED LAND OWNERS SURFACE ESTATE 3/9/2018 10:44:11 AM THE UNDERSIGNED. States that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names. addresses, and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners of the property (the surface estate) within 500 feet of the property being considered. This list was compiled utilizing the records of the Weld County Assessor available on the Weld County Internet Mapping site, http://www.co.weld.co.us, and has not been modified from the original. The list compiled for the records of the Weld County Assessor was assembled within thirty days of the applications submission date. Property Owners Within 300 ft of Parcel # 120724100046 Parcels: 18 Owner Records: 20 Signature Date Page 4 of 4 )wn of Mead LUA # FP. 970-535-4477 www.townofinead,org 441 Third Street P.O. Box 626 Mead, CO 80542 FINAL PLAT TECHNICAL CRITERIA FORM Project Name e b ��2 n� �,,d3 l� V, 3A'CoN Project Address and Legal Description Licv,o/ Q2_ a o Nf (,)(„(-6.)4_ � `� 60 Li:- ( c�vi Tid eese ji do So AN. of (id C. e., 4 0:02_,.3 Z Ovi "tua U..int S i _Q Ct US Tc).rz R for Date Submitted C,rz t3 (7 /o - Fees Submitted Please provide the following to the Town Clerk with this checklist form. For additional information, refer to 16-4-70 of the Mead Town Code. 2190,el)e5 Ou5Q cwoe,5 (>2 plata- (3i bu.)(4t - rc 9 opc25 v co ,i,e. 5 2 ( Fob C<rvt le- te-N e ss ( 1. Five -( .paper copies of the complete application package. 2. All maps, legal descriptions and surrounding property owner information on 3 USB L )s `L�(L�v�s 3. Land Use Application Form, including certification of ownership or statement of authority. drives. 4. Fee Agreement and deposit. 5. Surrounding and Interested Property Ownership Report. 6. Title Commitment. The title commitment must be current and dated no more than thirty (30) days from the date of application submittal. 7. An affidavit certifyin 4,the names and addresses of all mineral and subsurface right owners. ( r�i�yl ��J c «�� Un ��✓n 8. Final Plat. The final plat drawing shall comply with the following standards: The plat shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of a Colorado registered professional land surveyor, shall be signed and stamped by said surveyor, and shall meet applicable requirements. Plats shall not include parcels that are not contiguous, nor shall more than one (1) plat be made on the same sheet. Contiguous parcels owned by different parties may be included on one (1) plat, provided that all owners join in the dedication and acknowledgment. c_5 Lengths shall be shown to the nearest hundredth of a foot and bearings shall be shown in degrees, minutes and seconds. The perimeter survey description of proposed subdivision shall include at least two (2) ties to an existing section monument of record and a description of monuments. One computer printout and electronic data of the plat boundary closure data (perimeter bearings, distances, closure and acreage information) shall be submitted to, and in a format as required by, the Town Engineer. The survey shown shall not have an error greater than one (1) part in ten thousand (10,000). Bearings, distances and curve data of all perimeter boundary lines shall be indicated outside the boundary line, not inside, with the lot dimensions. Names and signatures of all owners of equitable interest in the property being subdivided shall be on the plat and shall be made in black permanent drawing ink. Major survey monumentation, not including interior lot corners and other minor survey monuments, required for subdivision or re- subdivision shall be completed before final plat approval is given. Compliance with all the rules and regulations as set forth in Articles 51 and 53, Title 38, Colorado Revised Statutes, 1973, as amended, shall be required. The fmal plat shall be twenty-four (24) inches high by thirty-six (36) inches wide and shall provide the following information: • Title of project. • North arrow, scale (not greater than 1 "=100') and date of preparation. • Vicinity map. • Legal description. • Basis for establishing bearing. • Names and addresses of owners, applicant, designers, engineers and surveyors. • Total acreage of subdivision, total number of lots and total acreage by land use in a separate box on the first or second page of the set. • Bearings, distances, chords, radii, central angles and tangent links for the perimeter and all lots, blocks, rights -of -way and easements. • Lot and block numbers, numbered in consecutive order, and square footage of each lot or tract. • Excepted parcels from inclusion noted as "not included in this subdivision" and the boundary completely indicated by bearings and distances. • Existing and proposed rights -of -way in and adjacent to subject property (labeled and dimensioned). • Existing and proposed street names for all streets on and adjacent to the property. • Existing and proposed easements and their type in and adjacent to subject property (labeled and dimensioned). • Location and description of monuments. Final Plat Technical Criteria Form 08/09 Page 2 of 6 NAL • Floodplain boundary with a note regarding source of information (if a floodplain does not exist on the property, please state this on the plat). • Signature block for registered land surveyor certifying to accuracy of boundary survey and plat. • Signature block for certification of approval by the Board of Trustees with a signature for the Mayor and Town Clerk. • Signature blocks for utility providers. • Certification of ownership. • Dedication of streets, rights -of -way, easements and public sites to the Town of Mead. • The Final Plat Map shall contain on its face the following certificates. Text is to be 10 pt. (0.13888") AutoCADTM Roman Simplex, Helvetica, Anal or similar "san serf' type. Add signature lines to the Certificate of Ownership and spaces in the Notary Certificate as necessary for multiple owners. Add additional Notary Certificates as necessary for out-of-town signatories. Remove "extra" titles and signature lines in the Certificate of Ownership and spaces in the Notary Certificate as appropriate. The certificates are to be placed in columns not more than 6 '/2" in width. If multiple columns are required, separate the columns by 1". Legal descriptions are to contain a blank line separating each clause in the description. 9. General Development Information. Provide a written description confirming that the final plat conforms to the preliminary plat with only those changes to the Preliminary Plat that were required by the Board of Trustees. In addition, the description shall address how the proposed development conforms to this Code. 10. Complete Engineering Plans and Specifications. Construction Plans and Profiles. The Plans and Profiles shall be prepared by a registered professional engineer licensed in the State of Colorado, shall be twenty- four (24) inches high by thirty-six (36) inches wide and provide the following information: • The horizontal to vertical scales shall be chosen to best depict the aspects of the design. • Minimum horizontal scale: 1"=100'. • Minimum vertical scale: 1"=10'. • The typical road geometric and structural cross-section is to be shown on each plan sheet. • The plan must show right-of-way lines and widths, road names, lot lines, tangent lengths and bearings, curve radii, delta angles, curve lengths, chord lengths and bearings, stationing at all beginning of curves and end of curves, intersections, structures, angles, curb lines, cross pans, traffic control devices (islands, striping, signs, etc.), drive cuts, curb returns and radii, and all other features to enable construction in accordance with approved standards and standard engineering practice. Construction plans Final Plat Technical Criteria Form 08/09 Page 3 of 6 Co R'-ne tar?— sNov. NSA Coa,mr'i-01-0 ZV shall also include water, sewer, sanitary sewer, and brown water irrigation systems. and any other utilities such as irrigation ditches. (Note: The developer/owner is responsible for coordinating with the appropriate dry utility companies (i.e. gas, electric, telephone, cable). • The profiles shall include ground lines, grade lines of curb and gutter or centerline of street elevation at point of intersection of vertical curves, intersections and other critical points, structures, and all other features required to enable construction in accordance with approved standards. • Signature blocks for all utility providers unless otherwisrovided in 04St agreement form. ,5 ote C� • Structure Details. ewe*• Sewage Collection and Water Supply Distribution Plans, Profiles and Specifications. ---- - • Final Drainage Plans and Reports. • Final Grading Plan. Soils Reports. • Final Street Lighting Plan. • Final Landscape Plan. AutoCADTM Drawing File. Special Documents (as Needed): o Special agreements. o Floodplain Use Permit (from Town). o State Highway Utility Permit (from Colorado Department of Transportation). o State Highway Access Permit (from Colorado Department of Transportation). o Construction Dewatering Permit (from Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment). o 404 Permit (from Army Corps of Engineers). o Air Pollution Emission Notice (APEN) (from Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment). • o Work in Ditch Right -of -Way Permit (from individual ditch `<. S companies). o Rare Species Occurrence Survey (from U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). o Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA). o Right -of -Way Permit (from Town). o Grading Permit (from Town). o Improvements Guarantee — Cash, certified check, or a letter of credit from a bank in Colorado or other acceptable collateral in the amount stipulated to in the SIA, posted in favor of the Town in an amount sufficient to assure construction of public improvements for either part or all of the plat, as the Board of Trustees shall determine. a Approved adjudication of Water Rights and a Plan of Augmentation (if applicable). Protective Covenants, Homeowners Association (HOA) Documents, Metropolitan District Documents, Articles of T"S*4t5 Trott • Final Plat Technical Criteria Form 08/09 Page 4 of 6 Nr PtCLe55 Q(0ce 5 usk.k4. Incorporation for HOA, and/or Architectural Design Guidelines, if any, finalized and in a form for recording. If there are open space areas to remain in private ownership within the subdivision, the HOA documents must have in place a mechanism which will assure maintenance will be funded in perpetuity. o FEMA approved applications (i.e., Conditional Letter of Map Revisions [CLOMR] or Letter of Map Revisions [LOMR]). o Documentation showing who will own and maintain the open space. o Documentation for dedication of public sites for open space or other civic purposes all public lands other than streets shown on the plat or, in lieu of a deed, a check in an amount to be determined by the Town. 11. "Clean" Final Plat for Addressing. Title of project. North arrow, scale (not greater than 1"=100') and date of preparation. Vicinity map. Lot and block numbers, numbered in consecutive order. Rights -of -way and street names f P�'>c�-N�'-0fa_Cue Pce\'ihi LIINJ56-1Piruoy �_a��-q 2!y(ritfoaR4Y�3 Property boundary. r 1 . Other Information. Any other information r as may be requested by the Town. C `2 o-- l '�(' c� i �� 4-.c r 4 - vvt . g4 c -r Fu Cu S Telvt-t I 3 (o1 j --'----' r S-<c1� CC�Kz9 (f / 2 e W 1 �,2 � 6-ki ' L tam er k e Applicant Certification Sign in blue ink. Attach additional pages with certification language and signatures if more than two applicants. I (We) certify this application and all submittals hereto are complete and accurate. /,e01tr es*dr, G��I Applicant(s) Date Applicant(s) Date Final Plat Technical Criteria Form 08/09 Page 5 of 6 Staff Use Only Upon acceptance of this application by the Town as a complete application, a copy of this form, with anticipated hearing dates, shall be provided to the applicant by the Town. Anticipated hearing dates may not be actual hearing dates depending upon referral comments received by the Town. Application Accepted Date Fees Accepted Date Amount By Application Determined Complete Date By Open Space Committee Meeting Date Recreation Committee Meeting Date Planning Commission Public Hearing Date Board of Trustees Public Hearing Date By 1. Applicant submits forty-four (44) copies, nineteen (19) of which are bound in D -ring binders, of the application to the Town Clerk. 2. Town Clerk sends notice(s) of public hearings. 3. Town Clerk publishes notice(s) in a newspaper of general circulation. 4. Letters of Support and Commitment to Serve letters received from providers. 5. The applicant posts signs on property. A picture and affidavit of posting signed and dated by the applicant submitted to the Town Clerk. 6. Applicant submits three (3) 24" x 36" mylar copies, one (1) paper copy and two (2) AutoCADTM CDs of the approved final plat to the Town Clerk after Board of Trustee approval. 7. Town Clerk obtains the Town Officials' signatures and records plat at Weld County Clerk and Recorder's Office 8. The Town will provide the finalized Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) for signature. 9. Areas designated as open space shall be protected by a deed restriction or other appropriate method to ensure that they cannot be subdivided or developed in the future and will remain as open space in perpetuity. 10. Other Certificates, Affidavits, Enforcements or Deductions. As required by the Planning Commission or the Board of Trustees. This will include the final SIA and required financial securities. . 11. Special warranty deeds shall be provided for lands dedicated to the Town for parks, open space, water rights, both surface and underground, and other uses. Final Plat Technical Criteria Form 08/09 Page 6 of 6 Town of Mead LUA# 441 Third Street P.O. Box 626 Mead, CO 80542 970-535-4477 www.townotiuead.org PAGE TWO MUST BE SIGNED AND NOTARIZED Project/Business Name Red Barn Subdivision Sec 24, T3N, R68 W; NE portion Project Address Proposed RSF-1 & RSF-4 neighborhood Project Description Check the Development Review Process required for your proposed project: ❑ Sketch Plan (SKP) ❑ Special Use - Oil and Gas (SU) ❑ Zoning Amendment (ZA) ❑ Variance (VR) ❑ Waiver (W) ❑ Annexation (AN) O Conditional Use (CU) [* Final Plat (FP) O Planned Unit Development (PUD) ❑ Preliminary Plat (PP) ❑ Site Plan (SP) Legal Description (Provide Subdivision, l.ot 11. block ,H or AttaL:l1 Rictc,: and iiound 1 Sec 24, T3N, R68 W; NE portion Owner Name/Company (Attach Separate Sheets if Multiple) 13-32 Development, LLC Andrew Batson Contact Person (If Different) 12656 Waterside Lane, Longmont CO 805©4 Address/City/State/Zip Phone 303-641-5058 Fax Email andrew@yourwayhome.com Authorized Representative Rocky Ridge Civil Engineering Name/Company 420 21 st Ave, suite 101, Longmont, CO Address/City/State/Zip Phone 303-651-6626 Email aurora@rockyridgecivil.com Land Use Application Form 08/09, Revised 05/16 Fax Page 1 of 2 Mineral Rights Owner/Lease 1-iolder Kerr-McGee Oil and Gas Name/Company (Attach Separate Sheets if Multiple) Attn: Katherine Ross Address/City/State/Zip 1099 18th Street, Suite 1800, Denver, CO 80202 Black Hills Energy Gas Water Little Thompson WD Metro District EleetricEXI/EneVgY United Power Sewer St. Vrain Sanitation District Fire Mountain View Fire & Rescue Land Use Information RSF-1 & RSF-4 Current Zoning AAG Proposed Zoning Acres 196.3 Density (DU/Acre) 4/Ac 13 Custom Lots/14.60Acres for Blocks 1 & 2; (432 Lots/172.98Acres Lot A) # Lots/Units Proposed The undersigned is fully aware of the request/proposal being made and the actions being initiated on the referenced property. The undersigned understand that the application must be found to be complete by the Town of Mead before the request can officially be accepted and the development review process initiated. The undersigned is aware that the applicant is fully responsible for all reasonable costs associated with the review of the application/request being made to the Town of Mead. Applicants shall pay all costs billed by the Town for legal, engineering and planning costs incurred by staff including consultants acting on behalf of staff, necessary for project review. By this acknowledgement, the undersigned hereby certify that the above information is true and correct. Owner: Owner: Date : Cyndi Benson, Manager, 13-32 Development, LLC Date: Applicant:_ Andrew Batson, Project Manager STATE OF COLORADO ) tnr SS. County of J Y ( ) j A' /bra The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of Mara\ t , 20 byN n ,n !� rt � '3Z . ax___ Ow. v et,6 c•, ,, Date: l q My commission expires: ` Witness my hand and official seal. Nola. Public Land Use Application Form 08/09, Revised 05/16 KIM CALLAHAN NOTARY PUBLIC Arr_ 2 of 2 NOTARY ID tt 20024037264 lo pfv .MMIs5ION EXPIRES DECEMBER 2n9te ...+ 2s«. .....�..�� ge 1,I ;ilv., 24' WIDE ACCESS ._ASEMENI FOR t ISTOM LOTS MEADOWS S HOMESTEAD CR 13 (120' ROW) o ' WIDE ROV\ I r'a. ■ • ■ ■ • ■ ■ 9 a • • �• —" a • • S ■ ■ ciC • • I ■ I - ■ ■ i Nir • ■ ■ ■ ■ In ■ 1 SU . i �i�d•1<R•TL�aI^� A 11/14/17 68' WIDE R&IAGF )Ft V COCO • Oct ) • • • • • • • & • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • di 610 •0 •0 Q •0 •0 •0 • MEADOWS '- HOMESTEAD NEST CONN, ST. NAMES • CCO LOTS CLIENT CHANGES TO LOTS/PHASNO DESCRIPTION RED BARN SUBDIVISION TRACT A OVERALL CONCEPT PLAN & PHASING PLAN ZONED RSF-1 & RSF-4 MEAD, COLORADO 03/02/18 72318ASE PHASING LEGEND PHASE 1: 75' X 120' MINIMUM O 50' X 105' MINIMUM O 60' X 105' MINIMUM PHASE 2: • 75' X 120' MINIMUM • 50' X 105' MINIMUM • 60' X 105' MINIMUM PHASE 3: • 75' X 120' MINIMUM • 50' X 105' MINIMUM • 60' X 105' MINIMUM PHASE 4: • 75' X 120' MINIMUM • 50' X 105' MINIMUM • 60' X 105' MINIMUM PHASE 5 75' X 120' MINIMUM • 50' X 105' MINIMUM • 60' X 105' MINIMUM NOTES: t BASIS Of BEARINGS BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE EAST LINE OF THE NE QUARTER Of SECTION 24. 13N, R68W, 6TH PM. MONUMENTED AT EACH ENO BYA2fALUMHUMCAP INA RANGE BOX BEARING N00'0000'E 3 ALL ROWS CONTAINED ARE 60' WIDE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED LOT SIZE (17 LOT SIZE (27 LOT SIZE (25 LOT SIZE (29 LOT SIZE (26 LOT SIZE (18 LOT SIZE (24 LOT SIZE (57 LOT SIZE (14 LOT SIZE (43 LOT SIZE (34 LOT SIZE (35 TOTAL) TOTAL) TOTAL) TOTAL) TOTAL) TOTAL) TOTAL) TOTAL) TOTAL) PHASE A: CUSTOM LOTS/SIZE VARIES (7 TOTAL) PHASE B: CUSTOM LOTS/SIZE VARIES (6 TOTAL) Rocky Ridge Civil Engineering 420 2141 An, Suits 101 Lwnsmoot. CO 60501 303.651.6828 Dot* //roeepr, 'A.00n+ )wn of Mead LUA # PP. 970-535-4477 www.townofmead.org 441 Third Street P.O. Box 626 Mead, CO 80542 PRELIMINARY PLAT TECHNICAL CRITERIA FORM Project Name Project Address and Legal Description Date Submitted Fees Submitted Please provide the following to the Town Clerk with this checklist form. For additional information, refer to 16-4-60 of the Mead Town Code. 1. Five (5) paper copies of the complete application package. 2. All maps, legal descriptions and surrounding property owner information on 3 USB drives. 3. Land Use Application Form, including certification of ownership or statement of authority. 4. Fee Agreement and Deposit. 5. Surrounding and Interested Property Ownership Report. 6. Title Commitment (dated within 30 days of application). 7. An affidavit certifying the names and addresses of all mineral and subsurface right owners. 8. Preliminary Plat. The preliminary plat shall be twenty-four (24) inches high by thirty- six (36) inches wide and provide the following information: Title of project. North arrow, scale (not greater than 1" = 100') and date of preparation. Vicinity map. Names and addresses of owners, applicant, designers, engineers and surveyors Legal description. Total acreage of property. Existing contours at two (2) foot intervals (contours shall be based on USGS datum). Name and location of abutting subdivisions or owners of abutting property (if land is not platted). Lots, blocks, and street layout with approximate dimensions and square footage for each lot. Consecutive numbering of all lots and blocks. Existing and proposed rights -of -way and easements on and adjacent to the property. Easements should be labeled with recording and beneficiary information. Existing and proposed street names for all streets on and adjacent to the property. Existing and proposed zoning on and adjacent to property. Location and size of existing and proposed sewer lines, water lines and fire hydrants. Existing and proposed curb cuts on and adjacent to subject property. Location by field survey or aerial photography of existing and proposed water courses and bodies of water such as irrigation ditches and lakes. Water courses shall include direction of flow. Floodplain boundary with a note regarding source of information (if a floodplain does not exist on the property, please state this on the plan). The boundaries of proposed phases of the subdivision if the final plat is intended to be submitted in multiple phases. General location of existing surface improvements such as buildings, fences or other structures which will remain on the property as part of the subdivision. Location and acreage of sites of proposed parks, playgrounds, schools or other public uses. Location, function, ownership and manner of maintenance of any private open space, parks and trails. Preliminary Plat Technical Criteria Form 08/09 Page 2 of 5 Land use table - the table shall include: land uses, approximate acreage of each land use, and percentage of each land use (including how the public/semi-public land dedication requirement will be met). Total number of lots. Number of each type ofdwelling unit proposed. Signatory certificates. Oil and gas well locations (drilling windows and setbacks) and locate any gathering lines. 9. General Development Information. Provide a written description of the existing conditions on the site and the proposed development. Include the following items: Explanation of how the preliminary plat is consistent with the sketch plan, and if there are any differences, what they are and how the plan is still consistent with the community's vision. Explanation of how the items of concern expressed by the Planning Commission, the Board of Trustees and by the public at the time of sketch plan review, have been addressed. Explanation of how the plan is consistent with this Code and the Town Comprehensive Plan. 10. Preliminary Grading and Drainage Plan and Report. 11. Master Utility Plan. 12. Preliminary Landscape Plan. . 13. Preliminary Open Space and Ecological Characterization Plan. 14. Traffic Study. 15. Draft of Proposed Covenants and Architectural Design Guidelines, if appropriate. 16. Mineral, Oil and Gas Rights Documentation. 17. Soils Report and Map. Four copies of a complete soils report and map must be submitted. 18. Geologic Report. Four copies of a complete geologic report must be submitted. 19. Colorado Historical Society Records Search. If a listing shows a significant finding, a site -specific historic survey is required. The survey shall provide the following information: Preliminary Plat Technical Criteria Form 08/09 Page 3 of 5 Site identification including: State site number; Site address; Site location/access; Type and description of finding (what is historic); and Owner's name and address. Eligibility assessment for historic designation. Statement of significance. Management and administrative data including: References; Photographs of the site; Maps of the site; Name, address, phone number and qualifications of person completing survey; and Date of completion of survey. If, in coordination with the applicant, the Board of Trustees decides to protect an historic resource, a protection plan must be devised. 20. Water Supply Report. 21. Other Information. Any other information as may be requested by the Town. Applicant Certification Sign in blue ink. Attach additional pages with certification language and signatures if more than two applicants. I (We) certify this application and all submittals hereto are complete and accurate. Applicant(s) Date Applicant(s) Date Preliminary Plat Technical Criteria Form 08/09 Page 4 of 5 Staff Use Only Upon acceptance of this application by the Town as a complete application, a copy of this form, with anticipated hearing dates, shall be provided to the applicant by the Town. Anticipated hearing dates may not be actual hearing dates depending upon referral comments received by the Town. Application Accepted Date By Fees Accepted Date Amount By Application Determined Complete Date By Open Space Committee Meeting Date Recreation Committee Meeting Date Planning Commission Hearing Date Board of Trustees Hearing Date 1. Applicant submits forty-four (44) copies, nineteen (19) of which are bound in D -ring binders, of the application to the Town Clerk. 2. Town Clerk sends notice(s) of public hearings. 3. Town Clerk publishes notice(s) in a newspaper of general circulation. 4. Letters of Support and Commitment to Serve letters received from providers. 5. The applicant posts signs on property. A picture and affidavit of posting signed and dated by the applicant submitted to the Town Clerk. 6. Applicant submits two (2) 24" x 36" mylar copies, one (1) paper copy and two (2) AutoCADTM CDs of the approved preliminary plat to the Town Clerk after Board of Trustee approval. Preliminary Plat Technical Criteria Form 08/09 Page 5 of 5 Project Narrative March 14, 2018 RE: Red Barn 13 Estate Lots The 13 estate lots proposed in the initial filing will eventually be a part of the 200 acre master planned community known as Red Barn. Red Barn will have a professionally managed produce farm as its centerpiece along with numerous walking trails and other recreational amenities. The overall community is expected to provide a range of housing from the entry level mark (mid $300's) to semi -custom homes in the $700's-$1 million targeted for the thirteen estate sized lots, and with larger production homes in the mid $500's in-between. The project is compatible with the new comprehensive plan released in spring of 2018 by the town. The 1300 acre master planned community Barefoot Lakes is located to the south within Firestone's borders and Mead's Grand View subdivision is to the east. Water supplies for the initial phases has already been secured with Little Thompson Water District and sewer service is already adjacent to the property (*with the exception of the six estate lots that cannot be served by sewer). The thirteen estate lots will have their own HOA which will be responsible for maintenance of the private access road, trash and snow removal. The attached submittal is for thirteen estate sized lots. Six of the lots are one acre in size and cannot be served by sewer. Seven of the lots are approximately 2/3 acre in size and are served by sewer. The homes will face CR 32 and CR 13, but will be accessed via a rear private access road. Thus, from the street these farmhouse style homes will present attractive front porches and facades to the public. This will serve as a nice buffer to the higher density development in the middle of the subdivision. An example of the architecture is: HISTORICAL RECORDS SEARCH March 14, 2018 Per Jennifer Vecchi and Christopher Kennedy since there are not any structures located on the property no further historical records search is necessary. PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN March 14, 2018 A 25' landscape border along CR 13 and CR 32 will be provided. A landscape plan will be developed in accordance with Mead's specifications for this landscape buffer which is shown as a separate tract on the proposed plat for the 13 lots. Insofar as road widening will be required as part of the larger community development, but not for these thirteen lots, we request that landscaping for this 25' strip be delayed until the road improvements are completed. We have recently engaged a landscape architect for the larger project and will submit the plans for the 25' landscape buffer along CR 32 and CR 13 shortly. MINERAL RIGHTS AFFIDAVIT March 14, 2018 13-32 Development, LLC does not own any of the mineral rights or water rights relative to the Red Barn property. Anadarko is the leaseholder and operator for mineral rights production. We have been in touch with Anadarko regarding the concept plan and they do not have any objections at this time. We are in the process of obtaining a formal mineral rights search and will provide that within two weeks. The contact person is: Katherine Ross Landman Kerr-McGee Oil & Gas Onshore LP, A subsidiary of Anadarko Petroleum Corporation 1099 18th Street, Suite 1800 Denver, CO 80202 Office: 720-929-6671 Cell: 970-443-2905 Andrew Batson Batson Project Manager, 13-32 Development LLC _ CR 13 (120' ROWfiii) a _. .... - — -- — — 0- � � �'r'- v NN I • '_ - 4! I RED BARN, y Crushed gravel beds \N O • 0 W I ® o O 1 O ,..• Kid's p ground O O O O O O 4 ar• ARD WAY CD , 0 0 i--- co ,_ . � ./, i j W ® I O Farming Area �Y� sca_E r• r so a \ ® p I O `m I O ® o o I j o 0 I %_ n lea Orchard o O ;. ,^ K, i•v1 �If K N I l m Z•1 ' ® �I 0 O I • O r Welcome Darn, produce stand, flower/herb garden, possible pool? ( co I CD CD 0 j 0 4i O- I2 d I U �i-•_._. j , TT- LN I o _ NOTES: ; 0 © > 4- � 1 o 1 Emits OF BEARINGS / BEARINGS ARE BASE - Q - © i i I 25' landscape buffer and sidewalk THE �• ON EAST LINE OF THE NE QUARTER OF j © R I 0 I 0 0 O O I 0 SECTION 2•, T3N. R&M 8TH PM, MONUMENIEC M �,, w ._ �� I O I •r / ® I CO 1 0 0 1� O 0 I p AT EACH END BY A 2 ALUMINUM CAP IN A RArKiE BOX. SEARING Noo °boo E I 0 z la I• ` • © 0 O p I p 0 0 2 SITE CONTAINS APPROX. 188 ACRES. / © I O O O (n 1 O 3ALLRWSCONTANEDAREedWIDEUNLESS I0 I iLY. © • r� p p Ill i L 0 o ., . o X i 1 ; �.` O % I N0 i ° PHASING LEGEND Q /. 0 i 0 t j o , '� m o •/. 00 . �„ oo i �.,. O PHASE 1: o, W ,• 0 % • 0 0 0 0 ica— ` 0 O m /‹ O % 0 Q�,�o �' 75' X 120' MINIMUM LOT SIZE (0 TOTAL) O 1 OV � ® \ O (N I �.�in O o CD 0 0 0 • O 00000 /'/ \'. ® O 50' X 105' MINIMUM LOT SIZE (50 TOTAL) 0 0 0 ` / BARNYARD WAY- �•�' — - • 0 RED BARN W_AY_ _ - - - - - — ® 0 o _ T _ 0 O 60' X 105' MINIMUM LOT SIZE (33 TOTAL) 1 /%• 1 • �� T o 0 o I o PHASE 2: U 11 ,. i 0 0 0 I• o O :F.�7 in • O 1, j O O j O 75' X 120' MINIMUM LOT SIZE (17 TOTAL) ® , © ® ® 0 4 0 0 . CO •` 0 tr O 50' X 105' MINIMUM LOT SIZE (27 TOTAL) I 0 0 0 • c �. I r9 _ �� .. ® ® . 60' 0 0 j O X 105' MINIMUM LOT SIZE (25 TOTAL) 0 F �- ' '` �� I r j I ® 0 0 ® I PHASE 3: I . H.'tSt.'II 75X120'MINIMUMLOTSIZE(29TOTAL) II°J H. �. I D I D I D I D 0 0 0 0 • O O I D D O m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1� 0 � • li 1,1 • . `• - • re O 50 X 105 MINIMUM LOT SIZE (26 TOTAL) I r 1Y�� ! I. / /HV ' L, 0 I AYM i! O 60' X 105' MINIMUM LOT SIZE (18 TOTAL) I 1 O 0 IZ 0 i' I i, j' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 j 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 j O 0 PHASE 4: i• j j j 0 I 1 ® •I 75' X 120' MINIMUM LOT SIZE TOTAL) j m I 0 i 0 - (24 ® I . j ice 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c_I p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I O LLL�4�" 0 I`d' I O 50' X 105' MINIMUM LOT SIZE (57 TOTAL) • � �I ® �..�.. 0 O O Tot G1TOR nt _- - - - - - - - ---------- $ 0.1 (. ------ • 1 R te._._._. _ 0 00 60' X 105' MINIMUM LOT SIZE (14 TOTAL) j _WAY o j 0 ii PHASES ` i i 0 0 ® j? 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i 0 • !t00000000000004 x ,20' MINIMUM LOT SIZE TOTAL) 1 I I ® I (43 I l I ' I I I GU O 50' X 105' MINIMUM LOT SIZE TOTAL) 0 0 0© 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (34 I ( I J 0 0 7E'Rst!'C?R O 60' X 105' MINIMUM LOT SIZE (35 TOTAL) �./ TioniA+rrN ''•/ r �'/ — — — _ Ls_ 1 'I I I ° o o® 0 0 o • sewir ® i 1 — �».. m 0 0 PHASE A: rasa lir e 1 O CUSTOM LOTS/SIZE VARIES (7 TOTAL) PHASE B: O CUSTOM LOTS/SIZE VARIES (6 TOTAL) SW "° RED BARN SUBDIVISION TRACT A Rocky Ridge Civil Engineering • 11/2•/17 CLIENT CHANGES TO LOTS C" OVERALL CONCEPT PLAN & PHASING PLAN DAB CAD NO £5 "° ) OF 1 A 11/1•/17 CLIENT CHAN S To LOTs/PHASNC ABC ZONED RSF-1 RSF-4 0.3/01/18 I 7231BASE 723-1 420 21st Ave, Suite 1o, Laiy,wM. CO 80501 NO. DATE OESCYt/PnON BY MEAD, COLORADO 3°3.°°1.°°2° MG( //rockrwa«ivF.com GENERAL NOT, _o,� � r a�e..u� oaI_�L eaaL. rr�e�t,.e ante .o � r zO16 ,Too rq) o .no � EMA Tarn • AnD PVOJEC I PO.N!AP t5 SURVEYING CERTIFICATE 00.00 PO' West on Po for No C010,000 PIS 3,62 REED) !MINN SUBDINISICIN1 FINAL PLAT A SUBDIVISION HI .N (; I+OlIIONS 01 St (; I ION 13 AND SHP'ION 24, IO WN SHIP 5 NOH IH, IbANOI sA MST OF IHF 6IFI P. M. AND POH IIONS AF Si (: HON 1 ANU St C. IrON 19 IOWNSIIIP S NON II I, RANGt 6/ &SI O( IF A �'_M _, 'OWN OF MI AD, ()OLIN)1' OF WFI D, S1 A II OF COI()RAD() SHrI I 1 OF VVCR 32 S VICINITY MAP SCALE 1"=1500' PER fIFICAIE OF APPROVAL ROVAL BY THE BOARD OF IRLISI,S C.LHIII ICA, CI FINAL SIPI REVIEW AND APPROVAL CERTIFICATE OF DEDICATION to the public oY Porks Beginnmg ot N0rtrieCiSt. Corner of said SeePon 24, .1,c, pant also loepg Ihe N0F1,0, corner oT thar O ffice of the Weld County Cppi, ono Recorder at Recep,on No .43255.30. an August g. 201 / tneriLe NUrtFl pub. eosern nd on conveyed to tne Town of tntersection wan the Northerly y ,ne ot Weld County Road 32, thence along said Nortnery =t 30,00 �e o the foster, Hight of -Wily Vle.ld County Rood 13. sop, po,n, olso toe,ng the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; line of so.o Lot B South 8934 Sr Las. 3, 61 feet paint on the Easteny R,gnt-ot-Way W[10 C.u^tY Rood 13 thence n•ParTng pr000ngotion and along so, Easterly Right-of-Woy so, w eld Lounty Clerk and Recorder ar Receptior No 27334. on NArernoer 15. 19g, Soulh 89,0'42" Wes‘ iSouth 001904- Eost 308. fee: a pamt on Ole Sou, I.ne ol said Northeast Quarter ca so, Section 24. aiong the Soutn a, sod L. B Soutn West i,01.46 'eel to the Soutnwes, corner ul so, Lot B. 0,29•13 Wea, 9nEOP 'allortheast Ouorter oscid Section 24. thence °Jong so, West Ime at said Nortneost Ouar,er ana along the VIP, line of sold Lot D. Recoraea Plate of County ol day or 20 13-32 DEVELOPMENT. LLC uNswx P, PROJECT NO P-17-8375 HED BAN SuBDIPISION FINAL PLAT A SUBDIVISION BEING PORTIONS OF SECTION 13 AND SECTION 24, IO WNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WESI OF THE 61H A AND PORTIONS OF SFCTION 18 ANO SFC DON 19 IOWNSHI' 3 NOR IH, RANGE 67 WES, 01 IMF 6TH P.M TOWN OE ME AO, COUNTY CF WFID STATE OF TOE ORAIT ,s,., —s I — — 20 65. n A 89'1529 E 68.00' SIIEF 1 2 Of 6 WELD COUNTY ROAD 32 ="4.,:;1;,;',' N89'15'24"E 1861.36 BLOCK 1 ... LOT 1 .91 OUTLOT A 179115'___ so 3- r 1286.77:2,0. 5008080•, TRACT B BLOCK 1 LOT 4 88914874 LOT 5 I 50 TRACT C BLOCK 1 LOT 6 6 sr 7;y, BLOCK 2 LOT 1 LOT 2 LOT 3 \ri 8 r III 500'00'00"W TRACT B 860.17' 13-32 DEVELOPMENT. LLC ,N0.ILL HO P-11-8375 2 01 8 Sec 24-3-68 OUTLOT A OUTLOT A RED BARN SUCIDD A BOO N FINAL PLAT A SUBDIVISION BEING VOk IIONS OF SECTION 13 AND SECIION 24, FO WNSHIP ' NOR1H, RANGL 58 WLSF OF 11-1L 61H V. M, AND PORTIONS OF SLG I.ON 18 AND SECTION 19 FOWNSHI4' S NOH III, RANGE 67 WEST OF THE hIT PM, 1 OWN 01 ML AD, COUN f Y OF AL U. ',IA IL OF LAI ORADO 98911'27 >n 901.46 SHEE1 S 01 8 LOT 3 LOT 4 LOT 5 LOT 6 BLOCK 2 LOT 7 I\ 589'10"42WVo me 384.0 • I Ii OUTLOT A 989'11'27.W 530.43 500.00'00'w 860.17' 0 II oI use a,n 747,'Z7 322.37'I h I' I 4 II TRACT D - N89'59'41"E 60.00' 1/4 Corner Sec 24 f- be M 1.2.0.16 MSS 749 of46 %TTa C...a& "-1 rTh 13-32 DEVELOPMENT. LLC 9diE 3-H-2018 P-17-8376 01 3 SE0B RN SUBDIVISION SINAL Fur, 1—� 285.60' A SEI BOIAISION BEING POR?IONS 01 SLCIION 13 AND SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 3 NOR lEI. RANGE 68 ',VLSI 01 'i HL 61h1 P. M., AND PORTIONS Of SECTION 18 AND SFCT,ON 19 TOWNSHIP 3 NORM I, RANGE 67 AE 51 01 IIIE tiles P. M IO WIN Of ML AD, COUNTY 01 WELD, S1A1I 01 COLORADO N691524'E )11 SHE)' 4 0) 6 ))17,;,g.c," w"' "°" "'°'°' WELD COUNTY ROAD 32 N8915'24"E 1881.36' SEE SHEET 5 OF 6 — _ — _ _ — — —569'15'2 W — — _ —1791.15' — _ — -- -- __ — — _ — _. — _. —. — 6915'2a'W 9]6.76' TRACT B TRACT A BLOCK 1 LOT 1 LOT 2 LOT 3 SEE SHEET 2 AND 3 OF 6 FOR OVERALL SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY 6915'2CF ,669.9, OUTLOT A �, nb SOUTH r SEE SHEET 5 OF 6 c1 13-32 DEVELOPMENT, LLC IlalE 2.11. P-17-8376 01 4 6 HIED BARN SMC3DOMDSG IN [MAL MAT' A SL, ADI VIS,ON BEING TORTIO NS OF SEC ZION 13 AND SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, NANCE 68 WEST OF THE 61H P. M., AND PORTIONS OF SECTION 18 AND SEC ZION 19 !OWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANCE S/ WE S1 OF THE 6TH '. M., fC WN CF MEAD, COUNTY OF WEI U, STATE OF COI )RADC SHEET 5 OF 6 WELD COUNTY ROAD 32 N69'15'24"E 1681.36' I -1791 15' TRACT 8 TRACT A BLOCK 1 LOT 1 'ID NY LOT 2 9915'14 W 936.70' LOT 3 ITT TRACT B — -- -- BLOCK 1 LOT 4 1O 0 w LTJ w 5.4516 SCIJ EOM., SCALE 2. 50 N8915'14'E '069.91 SEE SHEET 2 AND 3 OF 6 FOR OVERALL SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY OUT OT A SEE SHEET 6 OF 6 ,� ..m..� LOT 5 TRACT B — TRACT C BE BLOCK 1 LOT 6 S 8 B 60 -J Se5 24 3 65 13-32 DEVELOPM ENT, LLC J J_r cc Z DEP. Ea N5556550 04 P-17-8378 KID 1.1161 S014151550500 1116,505f HIEH HAHN RUHEIJVIISITAl LEIING°aL P1 AT A SUH)VIS )N H41N( Ch HONb 01 St C110N IN AND SEC I)N .4, 10 WNS Il, 5 NOH RAN(;: bb W I JI V. AND (I2 IONS OF 5555 HON iH AND ',1(.11()N H IC WNy11 5 NOR11,, HAN.,I .. A 1)4 hl '. M., -U WN flt 41I AL, t. )..N Y OI W:i ) SIAIE Of CD, ()RADO OUTLOT A SEE SHEET 2 AND 3 OF 6 FOR OVERALL SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY Sam. LOT 2 —'Hi Iii S8934'57"E 319.67' f 9a HARVEST MOON ROAD seearsrE 312.04. TRACT D LOT 3 J BLOCK 2 LOT 4 LOT 5 LOT 6 350 BLOCK 2 A;. c TRACT ,gaa hn D n „�T...�..� JO 989'10'42,N 384.09' SEE SHEET 5 OF 6 WELD COUNTY ROAD 13 P T1 �1 13-32 DEVELOPMENT, LLC • 1 P-17-8376 6 RFD SUBUIVI., FINAL PL, w -.1 ,I N89'35'639'wl 289 52' SB9'34'5J'El 289.67' I 354.08', r REVISED EXHIBIT MAP LOT C, RECORDED EXEMPTION RE -2418, BEING A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO WELD COUNTY ROAD 32 — tS89'15'24'W —2136.88 589'10'42"W, 300'19'04"E - 308.29' NB9'12'33'E 2306.11 A o D ) Cr 01(7,107 MAP COPPER HOMES LIMITED P-11-8315 COPPER HOMES UNITE) RECORDED EXEMPTION NO. 1][1)-24-01 RECXI7-0048 PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION REPORT PROPOSED RED BARN DEVELOPMENT SOUTHEAST CORNER OF COUNTY ROAD 32 & COUNTY ROAD 13 WELD COUNTY (MEAD), COLORADO SOILOGIC # 17-1271 October 30, 2017 V SO LDEIC SOLOGIC October 30, 2017 Richfield Homes, LLC 428 Kimbark Street Longmont, Colorado 80501 Attn: Mr. Will Edgington Re: Preliminary Geotechnical Subsurface Exploration Report Proposed Red Barn Development Southeast Corner of County Road 32 & County Road 13 Weld County (Mead), Colorado Soilogic Project # 17-1271 Mr. Edgington: Soilogic, Inc. (Soilogic) personnel have completed the preliminary geotechnical subsurface exploration you requested for the proposed Red Barn residential development in unincorporated Weld County, Colorado. We understand the client intends to have the property annexed into the town of Mead, Colorado. The results of our preliminary exploration are included with this report. The subsurface materials encountered in the completed test borings can be summarized as follows. A thin mantle of vegetation and topsoil was encountered at ground surface at the locations of borings B-1 through B-10. Brown/red-brown lean clay with varying amounts of silt and sand was encountered at ground surface at the locations of borings B- 11 through B-20 and underlying the vegetative layer in the remaining borings. The lean clay varied from very soft to very stiff in terms of consistency, exhibited no to low swell potential and low to moderate compressibility at current moisture and density conditions and extended to the bottom of borings B-15 and B-19 at a depth of about 15 feet below grade or to depths ranging from approximately 4 to 9'/z feet below ground surface in the remaining borings, where it was underlain by brown/olive/gray/rust siltstone/sandstone bedrock. The bedrock varied from weathered to very hard in terms of relative density, exhibited no to low swell potential at in -situ moisture and density conditions and extended to practical auger refusal at a depth of about 18 feet below grade in boring B-16 or to the bottom of the remaining borings at depths ranging from approximately 15 to 30 feet below grade. Soilogic, Inc. 3522 Draft Horse Court • Loveland, CO 80538 • (970) 535-6144 P.O. Box 1121 • Hayden, CO 81639 • (970) 276-2087 Preliminary Geotechnical Subsurface Exploration Report Proposed Red Barn Development Southeast Corner of County Road 32 & County Road 13 Weld County (Mead), Colorado Soilogic # 17-1271 2 Groundwater was not encountered to the depth explored (about 15 feet below present site grade) in borings B-5, B-13 and B-14 and was measured in the remaining completed site borings at depths ranging from approximately 4 to 26`/2 feet below ground surface at the time of drilling. When checked about 3 days after completion of drilling, borings B-16 and B-19 had been destroyed, a dry cave-in was measured in boring B-13 at a depth of about 14 feet below ground surface, while groundwater was measured at depths ranging from about 3 to 13 feet below ground surface at the locations of the remaining borings. Groundwater level information is indicated in the upper right-hand corner of the attached boring logs. Based on the subsurface conditions encountered in the completed site borings, results of laboratory testing and type of construction proposed, we expect lightly -loaded residential structures could be constructed with conventional footing foundations and floor slabs bearing on the site lean clay and/or siltstone/sandstone with no to low swell potential. Groundwater was measured in borings B-1 to B-12, B-14, B-15, B-17, B-18 and B-20 at depths ranging from approximately 3 to 13 feet below ground surface when checked about 3 days after the completion of drilling. Comparatively shallow groundwater (less than 10 feet below ground surface) was measured in borings B-1, B-2, B-3, B-5 to B-11, B-15, B-19 and B-20. As a precaution, we typically recommend foundation bearing elevations be established a minimum of two (2) feet above the level of water observed in order to account for some seasonal fluctuation in the level of water and reduce the potential for water infiltration into basement areas of the proposed residences and/or impacts due to the presence of soft/compressible soils at intended foundation bearing levels. This will result in maximum foundation excavation depths in the range of about 1 to 10 feet below grade. As such, crawl space or basement (where feasible) construction could be considered for this site. Closer evaluation of the depth to groundwater should be completed during site -specific explorations to be performed after site development in order to better define the depth to groundwater at the individual structure locations. Raising site grades through fill placement and/or lowering site groundwater levels through installation of an underdrain system could be considered to facilitate full basement construction. An underdrain system would require a suitable outfall. Preliminary Geotechnical Subsurface Exploration Report Proposed Red Barn Development Southeast Corner of County Road 32 & County Road 13 Weld County (Mead), Colorado Soilogic # 17-1271 3 Very soft to soft high moisture content and potentially compressible lean clay soils were encountered near the measured levels of groundwater in the completed site borings. The lean clay would be expected to be elevated in moisture content and very soft near current groundwater levels and would be easily disturbed by grading and construction activities. Care should be taken to avoid disturbing the site soils prior to placement of any fill or overlying improvements. Soils which are disturbed by the construction activities or allowed to dry out or become wet and softened should be removed and replaced or reworked in place prior to construction of any overlying improvements. The very soft to soft lean clay encountered in the completed site borings would be subject to consolidation under additionally imposed fill loads. Areas of the site expected to receive fill depths greater than 4 to 5 feet should be developed as early as possible in the construction process. We recommend the fill materials in these areas be placed and allowed to remain in place for a minimum of six (6) weeks prior to the installation of site utilities and construction of any overlying improvements in order to allow for consolidation of underlying soils. Based on the results of completed laboratory testing, the site lean clay and thoroughly processed siltstone/sandstone appear suitable for use as low volume change (LVC) fill to develop the site. Bedrock fragments should be processed to less than three (3) inches in any dimension prior to use as fill. Care should be taken to ensure processed siltstone/ sandstone bedrock materials contain sufficient fines in order to reduce the potential for stacking and development of void spaces within the fill. Depending on the in -place moisture content of the subgrade soils at the time of construction, stabilization of the pavement subgrade soils may become necessary prior to surfacing in order to develop a suitable paving platform. A final pavement exploration will be required for the development after the sanitary sewer has been installed and the streets have been graded to approximate finish subgrade elevations in accordance with the Town of Mead (LCUASS) standards. Other preliminary opinions and recommendations concerning design criteria and construction details for the proposed site improvements are included with this report. Preliminary pavement section design estimates are also included. Preliminary Geotechnical Subsurface Exploration Report Proposed Red Barn Development Southeast Corner of County Road 32 & County Road 13 Weld County (Mead), Colorado Soilogic # 17-1271 4 We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. If you have any questions concerning the enclosed information or if we can be of further service to you in any way, please do not hesitate to contact us. Very Truly Yours, Soilogic, Inc. Alec Kaljian, E.I. Project Engineer Reviewed by: Darrel DiCarlo, Y.E. Senior Project Engineer PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION REPORT PROPOSED RED BARN DEVELOPMENT SOUTHEAST CORNER OF COUNTY ROAD 32 & COUNTY ROAD 13 WELD COUNTY (MEAD), COLORADO SOILOGIC # 17-1271 October 30, 2017 INTRODUCTION This report contains the results of the preliminary geotechnical subsurface exploration completed for the Proposed Red Barn residential development located in unincorporated Weld County, Colorado, although we understand the intent is to have the property annexed into the town of Mead, Colorado. The purpose of our exploration was to describe the subsurface conditions encountered in the completed site borings and develop preliminary recommendations concerning design and construction of residence foundations and support of floor slabs and site pavements. Recommendations concerning the installation of site utilities and preliminary pavement section estimates for interior site roadways are also included. The conclusions and recommendations outlined in this report are based on the results of the completed field and laboratory testing and our experience with subsurface conditions in this area. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION The proposed development includes approximately 200 acres which we understand will be developed as single and possibly multi -family residential. We expect the residential structures will be lightly -loaded one or two-story wood frame structures which will be constructed over crawl spaces and/or may include full basements (where feasible). Foundations loads for the structures are expected to be light, with continuous wall loads less than 3 to 4 kips per lineal foot and individual column loads less than 75 kips. Floor loads are expected to be light, less than 100 psf. Infrastructure improvements for the development will include utility installation and roadway construction. We expect the site roadways will be used by low volumes of passenger vehicles and light trucks, with occasional heavy truck traffic. Anticipated grading to develop finish site grades is unknown at this time. Preliminary Geotechnical Subsurface Exploration Report Proposed Red Barn Development Southeast Corner of County Road 32 & County Road 13 Weld County (Mead), Colorado Soilogic # 17-1271 2 SITE DESCRIPTION The development site includes combined parcels of land with a total of approximately 200 acres described as Lot B of Recorded Exemption RE -4216 and Lot D of Recorded Exemption RE -0048, located southwest of the intersection of County Road 32 and County Road 13 near Mead, in unincorporated Weld County, Colorado. At the time of our site exploration, the approximate north half of the site had been recently tilled and was devoid of vegetation and the south half contained a moderate to heavy growth of native vegetation. Ground surface across the combined parcel was gently sloping downward to the north, with the maximum difference in ground surface elevation estimated to be approximately 10 to 15 feet based upon available USGS topographic maps of the area. A concrete/earthen-lined irrigation ditch was observed on the southern portion of the site. A single-family residence, barn and other at -grade, wood -frame outbuildings were noted on the southeastern portion of the development parcel at the time of our exploration. Evidence of prior building construction was not observed across the remainder of the site at the time of drilling. SITE EXPLORATION Field Exploration Twenty (20) soil borings were extended to depths ranging from approximately 15 to 30 feet below present site grades in order to develop preliminary geotechnical subsurface information across the development site. The approximate boring locations were established in the field by Soilogic personnel based on GPS coordinates provided by a representative of the client and by pacing and estimating angles and distances from identifiable site references. The boring locations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the methods used to make the field measurements. A diagram indicating the approximate boring locations is included with this report. Graphic logs of each of the auger borings are also included. Preliminary Geotechnical Subsurface Exploration Report Proposed Red Barn Development Southeast Corner of County Road 32 & County Road 13 Weld County (Mead), Colorado Soilogic # 17-1271 3 The test holes were advanced using 4 -inch diameter continuous -flight auger powered by a truck -mounted CME-45 and CME-55 drill rigs. Samples of the subsurface materials were obtained at regular intervals using California barrel sampling procedures in general accordance with ASTM specification D-1586. As part of the D-1586 sampling procedure, the standard sampling barrel is driven into the substrata using a 140 -pound hammer falling a distance of 30 inches. The number of blows required to advance the sampler a distance of 12 inches is recorded and helpful in estimating the consistency, relative density or hardness of the soils/bedrock encountered. In the California barrel sampling procedure, lesser disturbed samples are obtained in removable brass liners. Samples of the subsurface materials obtained in the field were sealed and returned to the laboratory for further evaluation, classification and testing. Laboratory Testing The samples collected were tested in the laboratory to measure natural moisture content and visually and/or manually classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). The USCS group symbols are indicated on the attached boring logs. An outline of the USCS classification system is included with this report. Classification of bedrock was completed through visual and tactual observation of disturbed samples. Other bedrock types could be revealed through petrographic analysis. As part of the laboratory testing, a calibrated hand penetrometer (CHP) was used to estimate the unconfined compressive strength of essentially -cohesive specimens. The CHP also provides a more reliable estimate of soil/bedrock consistency than tactual observation alone. Dry density, Atterberg limits, -200 wash and swell/consolidation tests were completed on selected samples to help establish specific soil/bedrock characteristics. Atterberg limits tests are used to determine soil/bedrock plasticity. The percent passing the #200 size sieve (-200 wash) test is used to determine the percentage of fine-grained materials (clay and silt) in a sample. Swell/consolidation tests are performed to evaluate soil and bedrock volume change potential with variation in moisture content. The results of the completed laboratory tests are outlined on the attached boring logs and swell/consolidation test summaries. Preliminary Geotechnical Subsurface Exploration Report Proposed Red Barn Development Southeast Corner of County Road 32 & County Road 13 Weld County (Mead), Colorado Soilogic # 17-1271 4 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS The subsurface materials encountered in the completed test borings can be summarized as follows. A thin mantle of vegetation and topsoil was encountered at ground surface at the locations of borings B-1 through B-10. Brown/red-brown lean clay with varying amounts of silt and sand was encountered at ground surface at the locations of borings B- 11 through B-20 and underlying the vegetative layer in the remaining borings. The lean clay varied from very soft to very stiff in terms of consistency, exhibited no to low swell potential and low to moderate compressibility at current moisture and density conditions and extended to the bottom of borings B-15 and B-19 at a depth of about 15 feet below grade, or to depths ranging from approximately 4 to 9'1 feet below ground surface in the remaining borings, where it was underlain by brown/olive/gray/rust siltstone/sandstone bedrock. The bedrock varied from weathered to very hard in terms of relative density, exhibited no to low swell potential at in -situ moisture and density conditions and extended to practical auger refusal at a depth of about 18 feet below grade in boring B- 16, or to the bottom of the remaining borings at depths ranging from approximately 15 to 30 feet below grade. The stratigraphy indicated on the included boring logs represents the approximate location of changes in soil and bedrock types. Actual changes may be more gradual than those indicated. Groundwater was not encountered to the depth explored (about 15 feet below present site grade) in borings B-5, B-13 and B-14 and was measured in the remaining completed site borings at depths ranging from approximately 4 to 261/2 feet below ground surface at the time of drilling. When checked about 3 days after completion of drilling, borings B-16 and B-19 had been destroyed, a dry cave-in was measured in boring B-13 at a depth of about 14 feet below grade, while groundwater was measured at depths ranging from about 3 to 13 feet below ground surface at the locations of the remaining borings. Groundwater level information is indicated in the upper right-hand corner of the attached boring logs. Preliminary Geotechnical Subsurface Exploration Report Proposed Red Barn Development Southeast Corner of County Road 32 & County Road 13 Weld County (Mead), Colorado Soilogic # 17-1271 5 Groundwater levels will vary seasonally and over time based on weather conditions, site development, irrigation practices and other hydrologic conditions. Perched and/or trapped groundwater conditions may also be encountered at times throughout the year. Perched water is commonly encountered in soils overlying less permeable soil layers and/or bedrock. Trapped water is typically encountered within more permeable zones of layered soil and bedrock systems. The location and amount of perched/trapped water can also vary over time. ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS General Groundwater was measured in borings B-1 to B-12, B-14, B-15, 13-17, B -l8 and B-20 at depths ranging from approximately 3 to 13 feet below ground surface when checked about 3 days after the completion of drilling. Comparatively shallow groundwater (less than 10 feet below ground surface) was measured in borings B-1, B-2, B-3, B-5 to B-11, B-15, B-19 and B-20. As a precaution, we typically recommend foundation bearing elevations be established a minimum of two (2) feet above the level of water observed in order to account for some seasonal fluctuation in the level of water and reduce the potential for water infiltration into basement areas of the proposed residences and/or impacts due to the presence of soft/compressible soils at intended foundation bearing levels. This will result in maximum foundation excavation depths in the range of about 1 to 10 feet below grade. As such, crawl space or basement (where feasible) construction could be considered for this site. Closer evaluation of the depth to groundwater should be completed during site -specific explorations to be performed after site development in order to better define the depth to groundwater at the individual structure locations. Raising site grades through fill placement and/or lowering site groundwater levels through installation of an underdrain system could be considered to facilitate full basement construction. An underdrain system would require a suitable outfall. Very soft to soft high moisture content and potentially compressible lean clay soils were encountered near the measured levels of groundwater in the completed site borings. The lean clay would be expected to be elevated in moisture content and very soft near current Preliminary Geotechnical Subsurface Exploration Report Proposed Red Barn Development Southeast Corner of County Road 32 & County Road 13 Weld County (Mead), Colorado Soilogic # 17-1271 6 groundwater levels and would be easily disturbed by grading and construction activities. Care should be taken to avoid disturbing the site soils prior to placement of any fill or overlying improvements. Soils which are disturbed by the construction activities or allowed to dry out or become wet and softened should be removed and replaced or reworked in place prior to construction of any overlying improvements. The very soft to soft lean clay encountered in the completed site borings would be subject to consolidation under additionally imposed fill loads. Areas of the site expected to receive fill depths greater than 4 to 5 feet should be developed as early as possible in the construction process. We recommend the fill materials in these areas be placed and allowed to remain in place for a minimum of six (6) weeks prior to the installation of site utilities and construction of any overlying improvements in order to allow for consolidation of underlying soils. Site Development All existing vegetation and topsoil and fencing should be removed from any proposed fill and pavement areas. In addition, all trees and tree root systems (if any) and dry and desiccated soils associated with the tree root systems should be completely removed from within the areas of the proposed residences and beneath exterior flatwork/pavements. The depth and extent of required removal can best be established at the time of development through openhole observation. If/where required, the excavated/removed materials should be replaced as controlled and compacted fill as outlined below. After stripping and completing all cuts and prior to placement of any overlying fill and/or pavement materials, we recommend the exposed subgrade soils be scarified to a depth of 9 inches, adjusted in moisture content and compacted to at least 95% of the materials standard Proctor maximum dry density. The moisture content of the reconditioned subgrade soils should be adjusted to be within the range of +2% of standard Proctor optimum moisture content at the time of compaction. Very soft to soft lean clay soils were encountered near -surface in a majority of the site borings. Depending on the depth of site cuts, stabilization procedures may be required in some areas to develop a suitable working platform. Preliminary Geotechnical Subsurface Exploration Report Proposed Red Barn Development Southeast Corner of County Road 32 & County Road 13 Weld County (Mead), Colorado Soilogic # 17-1271 7 Fill soils required to develop structural areas of the site should consist of approved low volume change (LVC) soils free from organic matter, debris and other objectionable materials. Based on the results of the completed laboratory testing, it is our opinion the site lean clay and thoroughly possessed bedrock could be used as fill to develop the site. Bedrock fragments should be processed to less than three (3) inches in any dimension prior to use as fill. Care should be taken to ensure processed siltstone/sandstone bedrock materials contain sufficient fines in order to reduce the potential for stacking and development of void spaces within the fill. Wet materials encountered near current groundwater levels would need to be dried out prior to placement as fill. If it is necessary to import fill material to the site, those materials should have low potential for volume change and be approved prior to use. We recommend suitable fill materials be placed in loose lifts not to exceed 9 inches thick, adjusted in moisture content and compacted as recommended for the scarified materials above. The very soft to soft lean clay soils encountered with depth would be easily disturbed by the construction activities. Care should be taken to avoid disturbing all subgrade soils and placed fill soils and the need for corrective action. Disturbed soils should be removed and replaced or reworked in place prior to placement of any overlying improvements. Footing Foundations Based on the materials encountered in the completed site borings and the results of laboratory testing, we expect lightly -loaded site structures could be supported on conventional spread footing foundations bearing on the natural undisturbed lean clay, siltstone/sandstone bedrock and/or suitable fill soils placed and compacted as outlined above a minimum of two (2) feet above observed groundwater. The foundations for the individual structures should bear on like materials. For design of footing foundations bearing on the natural site lean clay or siltstone/ sandstone bedrock with low volume change potential and/or properly placed and compacted fill or overexcavation/backfill, maximum net allowable soil bearing pressures in the range of 1,000 to 3,000 psf appear usable. Preliminary Geotechnical Subsurface Exploration Report Proposed Red Barn Development Southeast Corner of County Road 32 & County Road 13 Weld County (Mead), Colorado Soilogic # 17-1271 8 Very soft to soft lean clay soils with insufficient strength were encountered with depth. Excessive settlement of improvements placed directly on very soft to soft lean clay would be expected. Individual site explorations and careful observation of all foundation bearing soils should be completed for each of the proposed structures to ensure those improvements will be supported on like soils/bedrock with suitable strength. Overexcavation/backfill procedures or other approved stabilization measures, or alternative deep foundation systems could be considered in areas of very soft to soft and compressible lean clay to reduce the potential for excessive post -construction settlement of the supported structures. Floor Slabs Based on the results of the completed laboratory testing, we expect lightly -loaded floor slabs could be supported on reconditioned natural site soils/bedrock and/or properly placed and compacted fill developed as outlined above in the 'Site Development' section of this report. Care should be taken to avoid placing floor slab concrete directly on competent siltstone/sandstone bedrock due to the potential for development of point loads on the slabs. Floor slab concrete should be supported on a thin layer of suitable bedding material if competent bedrock is identified as floor slab subgrade level. Care should be taken to avoid disturbing floor slab subgrades prior to concrete placement. Subgrade soils expected to receive flatwork concrete should be evaluated closely prior to surfacing. If areas of disturbed, wet and softened, or dry subgrade soils develop during construction, those materials should be removed and replaced or reworked in place prior to placement of the overlying improvements. Below -Grade Construction We recommend perimeter drain systems be installed around all below -grade areas to help reduce the potential for development of hydrostatic pressures behind the below -grade walls and water infiltration into the crawl space and/or basement areas of the residences. A perimeter drain system should consist of a 4 -inch diameter perforated drain pipe surrounded by a minimum of six (6) inches of free -draining gravel. A filter fabric should Preliminary Geotechnical Subsurface Exploration Report Proposed Red Barn Development Southeast Corner of County Road 32 & County Road 13 Weld County (Mead), Colorado Soilogic # 17-1271 9 be considered around the free -draining gravel or perforated pipe to reduce the potential for an influx of fine-grained soils into the system. The drain pipe should be placed at approximate foundation bearing level around the interior perimeter of crawl space areas and/or exterior perimeter of basement areas and run to a sump pit and pump system, free outfall or project underdrain system with a minimum slope of per foot to facilitate efficient water removal. If free outfalls will be considered, measures to help reduce the potential for reverse flow and animal access into the systems should be considered. Backfill placed adjacent to the below -grade walls should consist of LVC potential and relatively impervious soils which are free from organic matter, debris and other objectionable materials. The site lean clay and thoroughly -processed bedrock materials could be used as backfill in these areas. Bedrock should be processed as previously recommended prior to use as wall backfill. The site lean clay, processed bedrock and/or similar materials should be placed in loose lifts not to exceed 9 inches thick, adjusted in moisture content and compacted as previously outlined in the "Site Development" section of this report. Excessive lateral stress can be imposed on below -grade walls when using heavier mechanical compaction equipment. We recommend compaction of unbalanced basement wall backfill be completed using light mechanical or hand compaction equipment. Utility Installation Bedding around utility pipelines should be placed in accordance with recommendations from the pipeline designer. Backfill soils placed above pipelines should consist of approved materials which are free from organic matter, debris and other objectionable materials. The on -site lean clay and thoroughly processed bedrock could be used as pipeline backfill. Bedrock should be processed as previously recommended prior to use as pipeline backfill. Pipeline backfill should be placed in maximum 9 -inch loose lifts, adjusted in moisture and compacted as previously outlined. Utility excavations will likely expose the overburden lean clay. The lean clay materials at depths approaching groundwater levels would be particularly susceptible to sloughing Preliminary Geotechnical Subsurface Exploration Report Proposed Red Barn Development Southeast Corner of County Road 32 & County Road 13 Weld County (Mead), Colorado Soilogic # 17-1271 10 and caving during excavation. Care will be needed to ensure utilities are not placed on or above disturbed or sloughed materials. In addition, care will be needed to develop stable side slopes in pipeline trenches excavated through some of the soft lean clay soils. As such, we expect temporary shoring, bracing, or cutting of shallow slopes will be necessary in deeper excavations. Excavations should be sloped or shored in the interest of safety following local and federal regulations, including current OSHA excavation and trench safety standards. As a safety measure, it is recommended that vehicles and soil stockpiles be kept to a minimum lateral distance from the top edge of utility excavations equal to no less than the depth of utility excavation. Cuts below groundwater elevation will require dewatering to facilitate proper construction. We expect a majority of the dewatering procedures could be completed through open pumping procedures in sumps fed from ditches or sloped trench excavations. Deeper utility excavations may require well -point systems for proper dewatering. Site Roadways We expect the pavement subgrades will consist of lean clay with no to low swell potential. These soils classify as A-6 and A-4 soils in accordance with The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) classification system and would be expected to exhibit low remolded shear strength. Pavement subgrades should be developed as outlined in the "Site Development" section of this report. If importing of soils will be completed to develop finish roadway subgrade levels, those materials should consist of approved LVC soils which possess a liquid limit of 40 or less and plasticity index of 20 or less. A final subgrade evaluation and pavement section design report will be required after the sanitary sewer has been installed and the roadways have been developed to approximate finish grade in accordance with the Town of Mead (LCUASS) standards. For preliminary design estimates, a pavement section consisting of 4 inches of asphaltic concrete overlying 6 inches of aggregate base course could be used for streets classified as local residential. A pavement section consisting of 51/2 inches of asphaltic concrete overlying 7 inches of aggregate base course could be used for streets designated residential/minor collector (if any). Preliminary Geotechnical Subsurface Exploration Report Proposed Red Barn Development Southeast Corner of County Road 32 & County Road 13 Weld County (Mead), Colorado Soilogic # 17-1271 11 The lean clay soils encountered at this site would be particularly susceptible to strength loss and instability when elevated in moisture content, with a tendency to rut and pump when subjected to vehicle traffic. Depending on the in -place moisture content of the subgrade soils, time of year when construction occurs and other hydrologic conditions, stabilization of site pavement subgrades may become necessary to develop a suitable paving platform. If required, we recommend consideration be given to stabilization of the pavement subgrades with Class C fly ash. Fly ash stabilization can also eliminate some of the uncertainty associated with attempting to pave during periods of inclement weather. Drainage Positive drainage is imperative for satisfactory long-term performance of the proposed site residences and associated site improvements. We recommend positive drainage be developed away from all site structures and pavement areas to reduce the potential for wetting of the subgrade and bearing materials. Water which is allowed to pond adjacent to the site improvements can result in unacceptable performance of those improvements over time. LIMITATIONS This report was prepared based upon the data obtained from the completed site exploration, laboratory testing, engineering analysis and any other information discussed. The completed borings provide an indication of subsurface conditions at the boring locations only. Variations in subsurface conditions can occur in relatively short distances away from the borings. This report does not reflect any variations which may occur across the site or away from the borings. If variations in the subsurface conditions anticipated become evident, the geotechnical engineer should be notified immediately so that further evaluation and supplemental recommendations can be provided. Preliminary Geotechnical Subsurface Exploration Report Proposed Red Barn Development Southeast Corner of County Road 32 & County Road 13 Weld County (Mead), Colorado Soilogic # 17-1271 12 The scope of services for this project does not include either specifically or by implication any biological or environmental assessment of the site or identification or prevention of pollutants or hazardous materials or conditions. Other studies should be completed if concerns over the potential of such contamination or pollution exist. The geotechnical engineer should be retained to review the plans and specifications so that comments can be made regarding the interpretation and implementation of our geotechnical recommendations in the design and specifications. The geotechnical engineer should also be retained to provide testing and observation services during construction to help determine that the design requirements are fulfilled. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of our client for specific application to the project discussed and has been prepared in accordance with the generally accepted standard of care for the profession. No warranties express or implied, are made. The conclusions and recommendations contained in this report should not be considered valid in the event that any changes in the nature, design or location of the project as outlined in this report are planned, unless those changes are reviewed and the conclusions of this report modified and verified in writing by the geotechnical engineer. PROPOSED RED BARN DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION WELD COUNTY (MEAD), COLORADO Project # 17-1271 October 2017 LOG OF BORING B-1 L LO IC - -- --- --- Sheet 1/1 Drilling Rig: CME 55 Water Depth Information Start Date 9/26/2017 Auger Type: 4" CFA During Drilling 5.0' Finish Date 9/26/2017 Hammer Type: Manual After Drilling 5.0' Surface Elev. - Field Personnel: SWM 3 Days After Drilling 4.5' (I) a Estimated Swell % Passing y SOIL DESCRIPTION Depth E "N" MC DD q % Swell @ Pressure Atterberg Limits # 200 Sieve (ft) rn (%) (pcf) (psf) 500 psf (psf) LL PI (%) 3-6" VEGETATION & TOPSOIL - 1 2 CL LEAN CLAY with varying 3 amounts of SILT and SAND - brown, red -brown 4 soft - 5 CS 3 23.5 103.7 1000 None <500 6 7 8 9 10 CS 50/6" 23.0 100.4 9000+ None <500 11 12 13 14 15 CS BNCE 16 17 SILTSTONE/SANDSTONE - brown, olive, gray, rust 18 very hard - 19 20 CS 50/1" - - 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 BOTTOM OF BORING @ 30.0' 30 CS BNCE PROPOSED RED BARN DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION WELD COUNTY (MEAD), COLORADO Project # 17-1271 October 2017 LOG OF BORING B-2 SO' LOGIC Sheet 1/1 Drilling Rig: CME 55 Water Depth Information Start Date 9/26/2017 Auger Type: 4" CFA During Drilling 4.0' Finish Date 9/26/2017 Hammer Type: Manual After Drilling 4.0' Surface Elev. - Field Personnel: SWM 3 Days After Drilling 3.0' N Estimated I Swell % Passing y SOIL DESCRIPTION Depth E "N" MC DD q„ % Swell @ Pressure Atterberg Limits # 200 Sieve (ft) rn (%) (pcf) (psf) 500 psf (psf) LL P1 (%) 3-6" VEGETATION & TOPSOIL 1 2 3 CL LEAN CLAY with varying - amounts of SILT and SAND 4 brown, red -brown - medium stiff 5 CS 9 23.3 104.1 <500 None <500 6 7 8 9 10 CS 50/4" 13.5 122.6 9000+ None <500 - - - SILTSTONE/SANDSTONE 11 brown. olive. gray, rust - very hard 12 13 14 15 CS 50/2" - - BOTTOM OF BORING @ 15.0' - 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 PROPOSED RED BARN DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION WELD COUNTY (MEAD), COLORADO Project # 17-1271 October 2017 LOG OF BORING B-3 SCE" Y LOGIC Sheet 1/1 Drilling Rig: CME 55 Water Depth Information Start Date 9/26/2017 Auger Type: 4" CFA During Drilling 6.5' Finish Date 9/26/2017 Hammer Type: Manual After Drilling 6.5' Surface Elev. - Field Personnel: SWM 3 Days After Drilling 6.0' CO Q D SOIL DESCRIPTION Depth (ft) d g N "N" MC (%) DD (pcf) Estimated q (psf) % Swell @ 500 psf Swell Pressure (psf) Atterberg LL Limits PI % Passing # 200 Sieve (%) 3-6" VEGETATION & TOPSOIL - 1 2 3 CS 7 25.5 94.5 1500 - 36 17 79.9% CL LEAN CLAY with varying 4 amounts of SILT and SAND - brown, red -brown soft to medium stiff 5 CS 4 23.8 102.8 1000 None <500 6 7 8 9 10 CS 50/6" 24.6 96.5 N/A None <500 - - - 11 SILTSTONE/SANDSTONE - brown. olive, gray, rust 12 very hard - 13 14 15 CS 50/4" 15.0 87.2 4000 - BOTTOM OF BORING @ 15.0' - 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 PROPOSED RED BARN DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION WELD COUNTY (MEAD), COLORADO Project # 17-1271 October 2017 SO,„' LOG OF BORING B-4 e Sheet 1/1 Drilling Rig: CME 55 Water Depth Information Start Date 9/26/2017 Auger Type: 4" CFA During Drilling 16.5' Finish Date 9/26/2017 Hammer Type: Manual After Drilling 16.5' Surface Elev. - Field Personnel: SWM 3 Days After Drilling 10.0' to iti Estimated Swell % Passing rn SOIL DESCRIPTION Depth E "N" MC DD q„ % Swell @ Pressure Atterberg Limits # 200 Sieve (ft) N (%) (pcf) (psf) 500 psf (psf) LL PI (%) 3-6" VEGETATION 8 TOPSOIL 1 2 CL LEAN CLAY with varying 3 amounts of SILT and SAND - brown, red -brown 4 soft - 5 CS 4 20.1 104.6 3000 None <500 6 7 8 9 10 CS 50/3" 20.1 94.2 2500 None <500 11 12 13 14 15 CS 50/3" 16.6 N/A 16 17 SILTSTONE/SANDSTONE 18 brown, olive, gray, rust - very hard 19 20 CS 50/3" 18.9 N/A - 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 BOTTOM OF BORING @ 30.0' 30 CS BNCE PROPOSED RED BARN DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION WELD COUNTY (MEAD), COLORADO Project # 17-1271 October 2017 LOG OF BORING B-5 SD LOGIC Sheet 1/1 Drilling Rig: CME 55 Water Depth Information Start Date 9/26/2017 Auger Type: 4" CFA During Drilling None Finish Date 9/26/2017 Hammer Type: Manual After Drilling None Surface Elev. - Field Personnel: SWM 3 Days After Drilling 8.0' rn d Estimated Swell °/0 Passing N SOIL DESCRIPTION Depth E "N" MC DD q % Swell @ Pressure Atterberg Limits # 200 Sieve m (ft) y (%) (pcf) (psf) 500psf (psf) LL PI ° ( /o) 3-6" VEGETATION & TOPSOIL 1 CL LEAN CLAY with varying amounts of SILT and SAND 2 brown, red -brown 3 stiff - 4 5 CS 11 16.1 109.2 N/A None <500 6 7 8 9 SILTSTONE/SANDSTONE - brown, olive, gray, rust 10 CS 50/2" 15.8 90.1 3000 - - very hard - 11 12 13 14 15 CS 50/4" 16.3 N/A - BOTTOM OF BORING @ 15.0' - 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 PROPOSED RED BARN DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION WELD COUNTY (MEAD), COLORADO Project # 17-1271 October 2017 LOG OF BORING B-6 SO` LOGIC Sheet 1/1 Drilling Rig: CME 55 Water Depth Information Start Date 9/26/2017 Auger Type: 4" CFA During Drilling 9.0' Finish Date 9/26/2017 Hammer Type: Manual After Drilling 9.0' Surface Elev. - Field Personnel: SWM 3 Days After Drilling 4.5' co a Estimated Swell % Passing co SOIL DESCRIPTION Depth § "N" MC DD q % Swell @ Pressure Atterberg Limits # 200 Sieve (ft) rn (%) (pcf) (psf) 500 psf (psf) LL PI (%) 3-6" VEGETATION & TOPSOIL - 1 2 3 CS 13 22.5 102.4 9000+ 0.1% 800 CL LEAN CLAY with varying - amounts of SILT and SAND 4 brown, red -brown - medium stiff to stiff 5 CS 9 23.4 99.8 2000 None <500 6 7 8 9 10 CS 50/10" 19.3 98.4 N/A None <500 - SILTSTONE/SANDSTONE 11 brown, olive, gray, rust - medium hard to very hard 12 13 14 15 CS BNCE - BOTTOM OF BORING @ 15.0' - 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 PROPOSED RED BARN DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION WELD COUNTY (MEAD), COLORADO Project # 17-1271 LOG OF BORING B-7 October 2017 gp� c ��" Sheet 1/1 Drilling Rig: CME 55 Water Depth Information Start Date 9/26/2017 Auger Type: 4" CFA During Drilling 4.5' Finish Date 9/26/2017 Hammer Type: Manual After Drilling 4.5' Surface Elev. - Field Personnel: SWM 3 Days After Drilling 4.0' CI) ;, Estimated Swell % Passing SOIL DESCRIPTION Depth E "N" MC DD q„ % Swell @ Pressure Atterberg Limits # 200 Sieve (ft) '" (%) (pcf) (psf) 500 psf (psf) LL PI r/o) 3-6" VEGETATION & TOPSOIL - 1 2 CL LEAN CLAY with varying 3 amounts of SILT and SAND - brown, red -brown 4 soft - 5 CS 3 25.0 105.1 N/A None <500 6 7 8 9 10 CS 50/7" 21.2 101.0 9000+ None <500 11 12 13 14 15 CS 50/3" 16 SILTSTONE/SANDSTONE - brown, olive, gray, rust 17 very hard - hard to very hard 18 19 20 CS 50/1" 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 BOTTOM OF BORING @ 30.0' 30 CS 50/3" 13.6 108.3 9000+ PROPOSED RED BARN DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION WELD COUNTY (MEAD), COLORADO Project # 17-1271 LOG OF BORING B-8 October 2017 SO;' LOGIC Sheet 1/1 Drilling Rig: CME 55 Water Depth Information Start Date 9/26/2017 Auger Type: 4" CFA During Drilling 5.5' Finish Date 9/26/2017 Hammer Type: Manual After Drilling 5.5' Surface Elev. - _Field Personnel: SWM 3 Days After Drilling 5.0' m `E Estimated Swell °/0 Passing jSOIL DESCRIPTION Depth E "N" MC DD q % Swell @ Pressure Atterberg Limits # 200 Sieve (ft) w (%) (pcf) (psf) 500 psf (psf) LL PI (%) 3-6" VEGETATION & TOPSOIL - 1 2 3 CL LEAN CLAY with varying - amounts of SILT and SAND 4 brown, red -brown - soft 5 CS 4 25.7 97.8 1000 None <500 - - 6 7 8 9 10 CS 50/5" 22.0 99.6 N/A None <500 - - SILTSTONE/SANDSTONE 11 brown, olive. gray, rust - very hard 12 13 14 15 CS 50/5" 17.2 94.8 9000+ - BOTTOM OF BORING @ 15.0' - 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 PROPOSED RED BARN DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION WELD COUNTY (MEAD), COLORADO Project # 17-1271 October 2017 LOG OF BORING B-9 - IC SOIL mignang• Sheet 1/1 Drilling Rig: CME 55 Water Depth Information Start Date 9/26/2017 Auger Type: 4" CFA During Drilling 10.0' Finish Date 9/26/2017 Hammer Type: Manual After Drilling 10.0' Surface Elev. - Field Personnel: SWM 3 Days After Drilling 7.0' N d Estimated Swell % Passing N SOIL DESCRIPTION Depth E "N" MC DD q % Swell @ Pressure Atterberg Limits # 200 Sieve n (ft) w r/o) (pcf) (psf) 500 psf (psf) LL PI 3-6" VEGETATION & TOPSOIL - 1 2 CL LEAN CLAY with varying 3 CS 5 21.7 101.2 3000 None <500 - amounts of SILT and SAND - brown, red -brown 4 soft - 5 CS 4 21.0 99.0 3000 25 10 59.0% 6 7 8 9 10 CS 50/5" 20.6 101.8 N/A None <500 - - SILTSTONE/SANDSTONE 11 brown, olive, gray, rust - very hard 12 13 0 14 15 CS 50/2" 19.1 86.6 5000 - BOTTOM OF BORING @ 15.0' - 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 PROPOSED RED BARN DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION WELD COUNTY (MEAD), COLORADO Project # 17-1271 October 2017 LOG OF BORING B-10 s Sob aMEMN Sheet 1/1 Drilling Rig: CME 55 Water Depth Information Start Date 9/26/2017 Auger Type: 4" CFA During Drilling 7.0' Finish Date 9/26/2017 Hammer Type: Manual After Drilling 7.0' Surface Elev. - Field Personnel: SWM 3 Days After Drilling 6.0' co = Estimated Swell % Passing jSOIL DESCRIPTION Depth E "N" MC DD q % Swell @ Pressure Atterberg Limits # 200 Sieve (ft) w (%) (pcf) (psf) 500 psf (psf) LL PI (%) 3-6" VEGETATION & TOPSOIL - 1 2 3 CL LEAN CLAY with varying - amounts of SILT and SAND 4 brown, red -brown - soft 5 CS 3 15.2 101.9 N/A 0.4% 800 6 7 8 9 10 CS 50/8" 23.4 99.4 N/A None <500 11 12 13 14 15 CS 50/3" 16.2 86.3 N/A 16 17 SILTSTONE/SANDSTONE 18 brown, olive, gray, rust - hard to very hard 19 20 CS 50/2" 17.0 95.3 1000 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 BOTTOM OF BORING @ 30.0' 30 CS BNCE PROPOSED RED BARN DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION WELD COUNTY (MEAD), COLORADO Project # 17-1271 October 2017 LOG OF BORING B-11 E a L° IC --- -- Sheet 1/1 Drilling Rig: CME 45 Water Depth Information Start Date 10/13/2017 Auger Type: 4" CFA During Drilling 14.0' Finish Date 10/13/2017 Hammer Type: Automatic After Drilling 14.0' Surface Elev. - Field Personnel: SWM 3 Days After Drilling 5.5' to d Estimated Swell % Passing co SOIL DESCRIPTION Depth E "N" MC DD q % Swell @ Pressure Atterberg Limits # 200 Sieve n (ft) y (%) (pcf) (psf) 500 psf (psf) LL PI ° (%) 1 CL LEAN CLAY with varying 2 amounts of SILT and SAND - brown, red -brown 3 4 5 CS 50 19.3 94.7 9000+ None <500 - 6 7 8 SILTSTONE/SANDSTONE brown, olive, gray, rust 9 medium hard to very hard - 10 CS 50/1" 19.9 104.6 N/A - - 11 12 13 14 15 CS 50/2" 18.5 103.1 5000 - - - - BOTTOM OF BORING @ 15.0' - 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 PROPOSED RED BARN DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION WELD COUNTY (MEAD), COLORADO Project # 17-1271 October 2017 LOG OF BORING B-12 Soil 1 rrr ��G! '"` Sheet 1/1 Drilling Rig: CME 45 Water Depth Information Start Date 10/13/2017 Auger Type: 4" CFA During Drilling 18.0' Finish Date 10/13/2017 Hammer Type: Automatic After Drilling 18.0' Surface Elev. - Field Personnel: SWM 3 Days After Drilling 12.0' rA U `m Estimated Swell % Passing SOIL DESCRIPTION Depth E "N" MC DD q % Swell @ Pressure Atterberg Limits # 200 Sieve (ft) rn r/o) (pcf) (psf) 500 psf (psf) LL PI (%) 2 CL LEAN CLAY with varying - amounts of SILT and SAND 3 brown, red -brown - soft 4 5 CS 4 14.9 109.0 9000+ None <500 6 7 8 9 10 CS 50/1" 16.0 103.7 N/A 11 12 13 14 15 CS 50/2" 19.3 99.8 4500 16 SILTSTONE/SANDSTONE - brown, olive, gray, rust 17 very hard - 18 19 20 CS BNCE 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 BOTTOM OF BORING @ 30.0' 30 CS BNCE PROPOSED RED BARN DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION WELD COUNTY (MEAD), COLORADO Project # 17-1271 October 2017 LOG OF BORING B-13 Sol`o1C 1 k .+ Sheet 1/1 Drilling Rig: CME 45 Water Depth Information Start Date 10/13/2017 Auger Type: 4" CFA During Drilling None Finish Date 10/13/2017 Hammer Type: Automatic After Drilling None Surface Elev. - Field Personnel: SWM 3 Days After Drilling Dci @ 14.0' rn ; Estimated Swell % Passing o) SOIL DESCRIPTION Depth E "N" MC DD R. % Swell @ Pressure Atterberg Limits # 200 Sieve n (ft) in (%) (pcf) (psf) 500 psf (psf) LL PI (%) 1 2 CL LEAN CLAY with varying 3 CS 11 18.5 101.4 6000 None <500 - amounts of SILT and SAND - brown, red -brown 4 medium stiff to stiff - 5 CS 8 17.9 103.2 7000 None <500 27 7 75.4% 6 7 8 9 10 CS 50/8" 17.8 107.4 9000+ - NL NP 85.0% SILTSTONE/SANDSTONE - brown, olive, gray, rust 11 hard - 12 13 14 15 CS 50/7" 17.1 112.8 9000+ - BOTTOM OF BORING @ 15.0' - 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 PROPOSED RED BARN DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION WELD COUNTY (MEAD), COLORADO Project # 17-1271 October 2017 LOG OF BORING B-14 SO Lc GPC Sheet 1/1 Drilling Rig: CME 45 Water Depth Information Start Date 10/13/2017 Auger Type: 4" CFA During Drilling None Finish Date 10/13/2017 Hammer Type: Automatic After Drilling None Surface Elev. - Field Personnel: SWM 3 Days After Drilling 13.0' to d Estimated Swell % Passing o SOIL DESCRIPTION Depth E "N" MC DD q„ % Swell @ Pressure Atterberg Limits # 200 Sieve (ft) rn (%) (pcf) (psf) 500 psf (psf) LL PI (0/0 1 2 3 CL LEAN CLAY with varying 4 amounts of SILT and SAND - brown, red -brown soft to very stiff 5 CS 5 17.3 108.9 7000 0.1% 700 - 6 7 8 9 10 CS 19 20.1 104.6 8500 0.9% 1400 - 11 SILTSTONE/SANDSTONE 12 brown, olive, gray, rust - weathered to hard 13 14 15 CS 50/7" 16.3 107.3 9000+ BOTTOM OF BORING @ 15.0' - 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 PROPOSED RED BARN DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION WELD COUNTY (MEAD), COLORADO Project # 17-1271 October 2017 LOG OF BORING B-15'� S x [_O : IC �- Sheet 1/1 Drilling Rig: CME 45 Water Depth Information Start Date 10/13/2017 Auger Type: 4" CFA During Drilling 8.0' Finish Date 10/13/2017 Hammer Type: Automatic After Drilling 8.0' Surface Elev. - _Field Personnel: SWM 3 Days After Drilling 7.5' to d Estimated Swell `1/0 Passing N SOIL DESCRIPTION Depth E "N" MC DD q % Swell @ Pressure Atterberg Limits # 200 Sieve m (ft) u) (%) (pcf) (psf) 500 psf (psf) LL PI ° (0/0) 1 2 3 4 5 CS 2 28.2 93.2 <500 None <500 - 6 CL LEAN CLAY with varying amounts of SILT and SAND 7 brown, red -brown very soft to stiff 8 9 10 CS 3 23.5 100.1 N/A None <500 - - 11 12 13 14 15 CS 11 16.4 112.0 N/A - - - BOTTOM OF BORING @ 15.0' - 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 PROPOSED RED BARN DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION WELD COUNTY (MEAD), COLORADO Project # 17-1271 October 2017 LOG OF BORING B-16 SQf LOGIC t aminimimEsal Sheet 1/1 Drilling Rig: CME 45 Water Depth Information Start Date 10/13/2017 Auger Type: 4" CFA During Drilling 12.5' Finish Date 10/13/2017 Hammer Type: Automatic After Drilling 12.5' Surface Elev. - Field Personnel: SWM 3 Days After Drilling Destroyed to d Estimated Swell % Passing N SOIL DESCRIPTION Depth E "N" MC DD q„ % Swell @ Pressure Atterberg Limits # 200 Sieve (ft) rn (%) (pcf) (psf) 500 psf (psf) LL PI (%) 1 2 3 CL LEAN CLAY with varying amounts of SILT and SAND 4 brown, red -brown - soft 5 CS 3 22.2 103.4 1000 None <500 - - 6 7 8 9 10 CS 50/4" - - - 11 12 SILTSTONE/SANDSTONE - brown, olive, gray, rust 13 very hard - 14 15 CS 50/2" 24.6 N/A - - 16 17 18 AUGER REFUSAL @ 18.0' - 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 PROPOSED RED BARN DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION WELD COUNTY (MEAD), COLORADO Project # 17-1271 October 2017 LOG OF BORING B-17 SGT° -R-r- > Sheet 1/1 Drilling Rig: CME 45 Water Depth Information Start Date 10/13/2017 Auger Type: 4" CFA During Drilling 26.5' Finish Date 10/13/2017 Hammer Type: Automatic After Drilling 26.5' Surface Elev. - Field Personnel: SWM 3 Days After Drilling 12.5' y `m Estimated Swell % Passing to SOIL DESCRIPTION Depth E "N" MC DD q„ % Swell @ Pressure Atterberg Limits # 200 Sieve (ft) w (%) (pcf) (psf) 500 psf (psf) LL PI (%) 2 CL LEAN CLAY with varying 3 amounts of SILT and SAND - brown, red -brown soft 4 5 CS 5 34.2 83.9 3000 None <500 6 7 8 9 10 CS 50/1" 16.1 N/A 11 12 13 14 15 CS 50/1" 17.6 99.8 2000 16 17 SILTSTONE/SANDSTONE - brown, olive, gray, rust 18 very hard - 19 20 CS BNCE 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 BOTTOM OF BORING @ 30.0' 30 CS 50/1" 21.7 64.1 N/A PROPOSED RED BARN DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION WELD COUNTY (MEAD), COLORADO Project # 17-1271 October 2017 LOG OF BORING B-18 SOILOGIC sisatiiesse Sheet 1/1 Drilling Rig: CME 45 Water Depth Information Start Date 10/13/2017 Auger Type: 4" CFA During Drilling 13.0' Finish Date 10/13/2017 Hammer Type: Automatic After Drilling 13.0' Surface Elev. - Field Personnel: SWM 3 Days After Drilling 11.0' y L. `m Estimated Swell % Passing co SOIL DESCRIPTION Depth E "N" MC DD q„ % Swell @ Pressure Atterberg Limits # 200 Sieve (ft) rn (%) (pcf) (psf) 500 psf (psf) LL PI (%) 1 CL LEAN CLAY with varying 2 amounts of SILT and SAND brown, red -brown soft to very stiff 3 CS 5 19.4 109.4 2500 None <500 4 5 CS 33 15.1 114.5 9000+ 1.3% 2400 - - 6 7 8 SILTSTONE/SANDSTONE 9 brown, olive. gray, rust - firm to very hard 10 CS 50/8" 15.2 108.8 8000 1.3% 2400 - - 11 12 13 14 15 CS 50/1" - - - BOTTOM OF BORING @ 15.0' - 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 PROPOSED RED BARN DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION WELD COUNTY (MEAD), COLORADO Project # 17-1271 October 2017 LOG OF BORING B-19 Y SD LO „SIC Sheet 1/1 Drilling Rig: CME 45 Water Depth Information Start Date 10/13/2017 Auger Type: 4" CFA During Drilling 7.0' After Drilling 7.0' Finish Date 10/13/2017 Hammer Type: Automatic Surface Elev. - Field Personnel: SWM 3 Days After Drilling Destroyed to a Estimated Swell % Passing co SOIL DESCRIPTION Depth E "N" MC DD q % Swell @ Pressure Atterberg Limits # 200 Sieve (ft) m (%) (pcf) (psf) 500 psf (psf) LL _ PI (%) 2 3 4 5 CS 3 23.8 99.8 1000 None <500 - 6 CL LEAN CLAY with varying 7 amounts of SILT and SAND - brown, red -brown soft to medium dense 8 9 10 CS 4 27.3 95.1 N/A None <500 11 12 13 14 15 CS 6 22.1 96.0 N/A - - BOTTOM OF BORING @ 15.0' - 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 PROPOSED RED BARN DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION WELD COUNTY (MEAD), COLORADO Project # 17-1271 October 2017 LOG OF BORING B -20r SCE LOGIC _. Sheet 1/1 Drilling Rig: CME 45 Water Depth Information Start Date 10/13/2017 Auger Type: 4" CFA During Drilling 6.5' Finish Date 10/13/2017 Hammer Type: Automatic After Drilling 6.5 Surface Elev. - Field Personnel: SWM 3 Days After Drilling 6.0' co Estimated I SWell % Passing SOIL DESCRIPTION Depth E "N" MC DD q„ % Swell @ Pressure Atterberg Limits # 200 Sieve (ft) rn (%) (pcf) (psf) 500 psf (psf) LL PI (%) 1 2 3 CL LEAN CLAY with varying - amounts of SILT and SAND 4 brown, red -brown - soft 5 CS 3 21.8 106.7 1000 None <500 - - 6 7 8 9 10 CS 50/7" 27.6 94.1 1000 None <500 - SILTSTONE/SANDSTONE 11 brown, olive. gray, rust - hard 12 13 14 15 CS 50/8" 18.1 108.6 9000+ - - BOTTOM OF BORING @ 15.0' - 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 PROPOSED RED BARN DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION WELD COUNTY (MEAD), COLORADO Project # 17-1271 October 2017 SWELL/CONSOLIDATION TEST SUMMARY 12 10 8 ale 2 Vidr*,,-AtttMll -4 % Consolidation -8 -10 -12 10 100 1000 Applied Load (psf) 10000 100000 Sample ID: B-1 @ 4 Sample Description: Brown/Red-Brown Lean Clay (CL) with varying amounts of Silt and Sand Initial Moisture 23.5% Liquid Limit Final Moisture 19.9% Plasticity Index Swell @ 500 psf None % Passing #200 Swell Pressure (psf) <500 Dry Density (pcf) 103.7 SOS"LOGIC PROPOSED RED BARN DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION WELD COUNTY (MEAD), COLORADO Project # 17-1271 October 2017 SWELL/CONSOLIDATION TEST SUMMARY Sample ID: B-1 @ 9 Sample Description: Brown/Olive/Gray/Rust Siltstone/Sandstone (Swell Only) Initial Moisture 23.0% Liquid Limit Final Moisture 24.5% Plasticity Index Swell @ 500 psf None % Passing #200 Swell Pressure (psf) <500 Dry Density (pcf) 100.4 SQf LOGIC PROPOSED RED BARN DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION WELD COUNTY (MEAD), COLORADO Project # 17-1271 October 2017 SWELL/CONSOLIDATION TEST SUMMARY Sample ID: B-2 @ 4 Sample Description: Brown/Red-Brown Lean Clay (CL) with varying amounts of Silt and Sand (Swell Only) Initial Moisture 23.3% Liquid Limit Final Moisture 22.9% Plasticity Index Swell @ 500 psf None % Passing #200 Swell Pressure (psf) <500 Dry Density (pcf) 104.1 SD LDGIC PROPOSED RED BARN DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION WELD COUNTY (MEAD), COLORADO Project # 17-1271 October 2017 SWELL/CONSOLIDATION TEST SUMMARY 12 10 0 3 zee 2 -4 % Consolidation -6 -10 -12 10 100 1000 Applied Load (psf) 10000 100000 Sample ID: B-2 @ 9 Sample Description: Brown/Olive/Gray/Rust Siltstone/Sandstone (Swell Only) Initial Moisture 13.5% Liquid Limit Final Moisture 11.5% Plasticity Index % Swell @ 500 psf None % Passing #200 Swell Pressure (psf) <500 Dry Density (pcf) 122.6 SO LOGIC PROPOSED RED BARN DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION WELD COUNTY (MEAD), COLORADO Project # 17-1271 October 2017 SWELL/CONSOLIDATION TEST SUMMARY 12 10 aft Water Atded -4 % Consolidation -10 -12 10 100 1000 Applied Load (psf) 10000 100000 Sample ID: B-3 @ 4 Sample Description: Brown/Red-Brown Lean Clay (CL) with varying amounts of Silt and Sand (Swell Only) Initial Moisture 23.8% Liquid Limit Final Moisture 21.3% Plasticity Index %o Swell @ 500 psf None % Passing #200 Swell Pressure (psf) <500 Dry Density (pcf) 102.8 SCIr LOGIC ake PROPOSED RED BARN DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION WELD COUNTY (MEAD), COLORADO Project # 17-1271 October 2017 SWELL/CONSOLIDATION TEST SUMMARY 12 10 8 6 co aft 2 0 -2 -4 co c ca -8 -10 -12 10 100 1000 Applied Load (psf) 10000 100000 Sample ID: B-3 @ 9 Sample Description: Brown/Olive/Gray/Rust Siltstone/Sandstone (Swell Only) Initial Moisture 24.6% Liquid Limit Final Moisture 26.4% Plasticity Index Swell @ 500 psf None % Passing #200 Swell Pressure (psf) <500 Dry Density (pcf) 96.5 SOS LOGIC PROPOSED RED BARN DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION WELD COUNTY (MEAD), COLORADO Project # 17-1271 October 2017 SWELL/CONSOLIDATION TEST SUMMARY Sample ID: B-4 @ 4 Sample Description: Brown/Red-Brown Lean Clay (CL) with varying amounts of Silt and Sand (Swell Only) Initial Moisture 20.1% Liquid Limit Final Moisture 21.2% Plasticity Index % Swell @ 500 psf None % Passing #200 Swell Pressure (psf) <500 Dry Density (pcf) 104.6 SD LOGIC PROPOSED RED BARN DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION WELD COUNTY (MEAD), COLORADO Project # 17-1271 October 2017 SWELL/CONSOLIDATION TEST SUMMARY 12 10 8 N aft 2 % Consolidation -2 -4 -6 100 1000 Applied Load (psf) 10000 100000 Sample ID: B-4 @ 9 Sample Description: Brown/Olive/Gray/Rust Siltstone/Sandstone (Swell Only) Initial Moisture 20.1% Liquid Limit Final Moisture 24.8% Plasticity Index % Swell @ 500 psf None % Passing #200 Swell Pressure (psf) <500 Dry Density (pcf) 94.2 SOf LOGIC PROPOSED RED BARN DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION WELD COUNTY (MEAD), COLORADO Project # 17-1271 October 2017 SWELL/CONSOLIDATION TEST SUMMARY Sample ID: B-5 @ 4 Sample Description: Brown/Red-Brown Lean Clay (CL) with varying amounts of Silt and Sand (Swell Only) Initial Moisture 16.1% Liquid Limit Final Moisture 19.7% Plasticity Index % Swell @ 500 psf None % Passing #200 Swell Pressure (psf) <500 Dry Density (pcf) 109.2 SO LOGIC PROPOSED RED BARN DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION WELD COUNTY (MEAD), COLORADO Project # 17-1271 October 2017 SWELL/CONSOLIDATION TEST SUMMARY 12 10 8 6 y be 4 2 0 % Consolidation -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 -12 Water Added 10 100 1000 Applied Load (psf) 10000 100000 Sample ID: B-6 @ 2 Sample Description: Brown/Red-Brown Lean Clay (CL) with varying amounts of Silt and Sand Initial Moisture 22.5% Liquid Limit Final Moisture 23.4% Plasticity Index % Swell @ 500 psf 0.1% % Passing #200 Swell Pressure (psf) 800 Dry Density (pcf) 102.4 SOP LOGIC PROPOSED RED BARN DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION WELD COUNTY (MEAD), COLORADO Project # 17-1271 October 2017 SWELL/CONSOLIDATION TEST SUMMARY Sample ID: B-6 @ 4 Sample Description: Brown/Red-Brown Lean Clay (CL) with varying amounts of Silt and Sand (Swell Only) Initial Moisture 23.4% Liquid Limit Final Moisture 23.9% Plasticity Index % Swell @ 500 psf None % Passing #200 Swell Pressure (psf) <500 Dry Density (pcf) 99.8 SO LOGIC PROPOSED RED BARN DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION WELD COUNTY (MEAD), COLORADO Project # 17-1271 October 2017 SWELL/CONSOLIDATION TEST SUMMARY 12 10 8 co are 4 View t _ -4 % Consolidation -10 -12 10 100 1000 Applied Load (psf) 10000 100000 Sample ID: B-6 @ 9 Sample Description: Brown/Olive/Gray/Rust Siltstone/Sandstone (Swell Only) Initial Moisture 19.3% Liquid Limit Final Moisture 24.0% Plasticity Index % Swell @ 500 psf None % Passing #200 Swell Pressure (psf) <500 Dry Density (pcf) 98.4 SD LOGIC PROPOSED RED BARN DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION WELD COUNTY (MEAD), COLORADO Project # 17-1271 October 2017 SWELL/CONSOLIDATION TEST SUMMARY 12 10 "AlstarAVzsal % Consolidation -10 -12 10 100 1000 Applied Load (psf) 10000 100000 Sample ID: B-7 @ 4 Sample Description: Brown/Red-Brown Lean Clay (CL) with varying amounts of Silt and Sand Initial Moisture 25.0% Liquid Limit Final Moisture 18.8% Plasticity Index % Swell @ 500 psf None % Passing #200 Swell Pressure (psf) <500 Dry Density (pcf) 105.1 SO LOGIC PROPOSED RED BARN DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION WELD COUNTY (MEAD), COLORADO Project # 17-1271 October 2017 SWELL/CONSOLIDATION TEST SUMMARY 12 10 8 0 6 N 4 2 0 % Consolidation -2 _ -4 -6 _ -8 -10 -12 Water Anted 10 100 1000 10000 100000 Applied Load (psf) Sample ID: B-7 @ 9 Sample Description: Brown/Olive/Gray/Rust Siltstone/Sandstone Initial Moisture 21.2% Liquid Limit Final Moisture 23.3% Plasticity Index % Swell @ 500 psf None % Passing #200 Swell Pressure (psf) <500 Dry Density (pcf) 101.0 SOf LOGIC PROPOSED RED BARN DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION WELD COUNTY (MEAD), COLORADO Project # 17-1271 October 2017 SWELL/CONSOLIDATION TEST SUMMARY 12 10 0 N be 0 % Consolidation -2 -4 -10 -12 - IA/bier-Aft 'iI 10 100 1000 10000 100000 Applied Load (psf) Sample ID: B-8 @ 4 Sample Description: Brown/Red-Brown Lean Clay (CL) with varying amounts of Silt and Sand Initial Moisture 25.7% Liquid Limit Final Moisture 21.5% Plasticity Index % Swell @ 500 psf None % Passing #200 Swell Pressure (psf) <500 Dry Density (pcf) 97.8 SOLOGIC PROPOSED RED BARN DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION WELD COUNTY (MEAD), COLORADO Project # 17-1271 October 2017 SWELL/CONSOLIDATION TEST SUMMARY 12 10 V) alt % Consolidation 0 -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 -12 10 100 1000 Applied Load (psf) 10000 100000 Sample ID: B-8 @ 9 Sample Description: Brown/Olive/Gray/Rust Siltstone/Sandstone Initial Moisture 22.0% Liquid Limit Final Moisture 24.7% Plasticity Index % Swell @ 500 psf None % Passing #200 Swell Pressure (psf) <500 Dry Density (pcf) 99.6 SOf'LOGIC PROPOSED RED BARN DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION WELD COUNTY (MEAD), COLORADO Project # 17-1271 October 2017 SWELL/CONSOLIDATION TEST SUMMARY Sample ID: B-9 @ 2 Sample Description: Brown/Red-Brown Lean Clay (CL) with varying amounts of Silt and Sand Initial Moisture 21.7% Liquid Limit Final Moisture 22.4% Plasticity Index % Swell @ 500 psf None % Passing #200 Swell Pressure (psf) <500 Dry Density (pcf) 101.2 So LOGIC PROPOSED RED BARN DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION WELD COUNTY (MEAD), COLORADO Project # 17-1271 October 2017 SWELL/CONSOLIDATION TEST SUMMARY 12 10 8 6 afa 4 2 0 % Consolidation -2 -4 -6 _ -8 _ -10 -12 10 100 1000 Applied Load (psf) 10000 100000 Sample ID: B-9 @ 9 Sample Description: Brown/Olive/Gray/Rust Siltstone/Sandstone Initial Moisture 20.6% Liquid Limit Final Moisture 23.3% Plasticity Index % Swell @ 500 psf None % Passing #200 Swell Pressure (psf) <500 Dry Density (pcf) 101.8 SOt LOGIC PROPOSED RED BARN DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION WELD COUNTY (MEAD), COLORADO Project # 17-1271 October 2017 SWELL/CONSOLIDATION TEST SUMMARY Sample ID: B-10 @ 4 Sample Description: Brown/Red-Brown Lean Clay (CL) with varying amounts of Silt and Sand Initial Moisture 15.2% Liquid Limit Final Moisture 24.1% Plasticity Index % Swell @ 500 psf 0.4% % Passing #200 Swell Pressure (psf) 800 Dry Density (pcf) 101.9 SD LOGIC PROPOSED RED BARN DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION WELD COUNTY (MEAD), COLORADO Project # 17-1271 October 2017 SWELL/CONSOLIDATION TEST SUMMARY Sample ID: B-10 @ 9 Sample Description: Brown/Olive/Gray/Rust Siltstone/Sandstone Initial Moisture 23.4% Liquid Limit Final Moisture 24.6% Plasticity Index % Swell @ 500 psf None % Passing #200 Swell Pressure (psf) <500 Dry Density (pcf) 99.4 SO t LOGIC PROPOSED RED BARN DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION WELD COUNTY (MEAD), COLORADO Project # 17-1271 October 2017 SWELL/CONSOLIDATION TEST SUMMARY Sample ID: B-11 @ 4 Sample Description: Brown/Olive/Gray/Rust Siltstone/Sandstone (Swell Only) Initial Moisture 19.3% Liquid Limit Final Moisture 27.3% Plasticity Index Swell @ 500 psf None `)/0 Passing #200 Swell Pressure (psf) <500 Dry Density (pcf) 94.7 so LOGIC PROPOSED RED BARN DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION WELD COUNTY (MEAD), COLORADO Project # 17-1271 October 2017 SWELL/CONSOLIDATION TEST SUMMARY 12 10 8 6 y 4 2 0 % Consolidation -2 _ -4 -6 -8 _ -10 -12 10 100 1000 Applied Load (psf) 10000 100000 Sample ID: B-12 @ 4 Sample Description: Brown/Red-Brown Lean Clay (CL) with varying amounts of Silt and Sand Initial Moisture 14.9% Liquid Limit Final Moisture 20.3% Plasticity Index % Swell @ 500 psf None %o Passing #200 Swell Pressure (psf) <500 Dry Density (pcf) 109.0 SO'LOGIC PROPOSED RED BARN DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION WELD COUNTY (MEAD), COLORADO Project # 17-1271 October 2017 SWELL/CONSOLIDATION TEST SUMMARY Sample ID: B-13 @ 2 Sample Description: Brown/Red-Brown Lean Clay (CL) with varying amounts of Silt and Sand (Swell Only) Initial Moisture 18.5% Liquid Limit Final Moisture 21.6% Plasticity Index Swell @ 500 psf None % Passing #200 Swell Pressure (psf) <500 Dry Density (pcf) 101.4 SOF LOGIC PROPOSED RED BARN DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION WELD COUNTY (MEAD), COLORADO Project # 17-1271 October 2017 SWELL/CONSOLIDATION TEST SUMMARY 12 10 3 aft 4 % Consolidation -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 -12 10 100 1000 Applied Load (psf) 10000 100000 Sample ID: B-13 @ 4 Sample Description: Brown/Red-Brown Lean Clay (CL) with varying amounts of Silt and Sand (Swell Only) Initial Moisture 17.9% Liquid Limit Final Moisture 21.8% Plasticity Index % Swell @ 500 psf None % Passing #200 Swell Pressure (psf) <500 Dry Density (pcf) 27 7 75.4% 103.2 SO°LOGIC PROPOSED RED BARN DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION WELD COUNTY (MEAD), COLORADO Project # 17-1271 October 2017 SWELL/CONSOLIDATION TEST SUMMARY 12 10 0 Water Aeel,nd -4 % Consolidation -10 -12 10 100 1000 Applied Load (psf) 10000 100000 Sample ID: B-14 @ 4 Sample Description: Brown/Red-Brown Lean Clay (CL) with varying amounts of Silt and Sand Initial Moisture 17.3% Liquid Limit Final Moisture 19.5% Plasticity Index Swell @ 500 psf 0.1% % Passing #200 Swell Pressure (psf) 700 Dry Density (pcf) 108.9 SDLDGIC PROPOSED RED BARN DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION WELD COUNTY (MEAD), COLORADO Project # 17-1271 October 2017 SWELL/CONSOLIDATION TEST SUMMARY Sample ID: B-14 @ 9 Sample Description: Brown/Olive/Gray/Rust Siltstone/Sandstone Initial Moisture Final Moisture % Swell @ 500 psf Swell Pressure (psf) 20.1% 26.9% 0.9% 1,400 Liquid Limit Plasticity Index % Passing #200 Dry Density (pcf) 104.6 SO`LOGIC PROPOSED RED BARN DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION WELD COUNTY (MEAD), COLORADO Project # 17-1271 October 2017 SWELL/CONSOLIDATION TEST SUMMARY Sample ID: B-15 @ 4 Sample Description: Brown/Red-Brown Lean Clay (CL) with varying amounts of Silt and Sand Initial Moisture 28.2% Liquid Limit Final Moisture 26.0% Plasticity Index % Swell @ 500 psf None % Passing #200 Swell Pressure (psf) <500 Dry Density (pcf) 93.2 SD LOGIC PROPOSED RED BARN DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION WELD COUNTY (MEAD), COLORADO Project # 17-1271 October 2017 SWELL/CONSOLIDATION TEST SUMMARY Sample ID: B-15 @ 9 Sample Description: Brown/Red-Brown Lean Clay (CL) with varying amounts of Silt and Sand Initial Moisture 23.5% Liquid Limit Final Moisture 21.5% Plasticity Index % Swell @ 500 psf None % Passing #200 Swell Pressure (psf) <500 Dry Density (pcf) 100.1 SCI LOGIC PROPOSED RED BARN DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION WELD COUNTY (MEAD), COLORADO Project # 17-1271 October 2017 SWELL/CONSOLIDATION TEST SUMMARY 12 10 6 co 4 % Consolidation -2 -4 -10 -12 Wa1s,rA 31 10 100 1000 Applied Load (psf) 10000 100000 Sample ID: B-16 @ 4 Sample Description: Brown/Red-Brown Lean Clay (CL) with varying amounts of Silt and Sand (Swell Only) Initial Moisture 22.2% Liquid Limit Final Moisture 21.8% Plasticity Index % Swell @ 500 psf None % Passing #200 Swell Pressure (psf) <500 Dry Density (pcf) 103.4 50kLOGIC PROPOSED RED BARN DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION WELD COUNTY (MEAD), COLORADO Project # 17-1271 October 2017 SWELL/CONSOLIDATION TEST SUMMARY 12 10 8 6 ake 4 2 % Consolidation 0 -2 _ -4 -6 -8 -10 -12 10 100 1000 Applied Load (psf) 10000 100000 Sample ID: B-17 @ 4 Sample Description: Brown/Red-Brown Lean Clay (CL) with varying amounts of Silt and Sand (Swell Only) Initial Moisture 34.2% Liquid Limit Final Moisture 34.3% Plasticity Index % Swell @ 500 psf None % Passing #200 Swell Pressure (psf) <500 Dry Density (pcf) 83.9 Sod LOGIC PROPOSED RED BARN DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION WELD COUNTY (MEAD), COLORADO Project # 17-1271 October 2017 SWELL/CONSOLIDATION TEST SUMMARY Sample ID: B-18 @ 2 Sample Description: Brown/Red-Brown Lean Clay (CL) with varying amounts of Silt and Sand (Swell Only) Initial Moisture 19.4% Liquid Limit Final Moisture 19.7% Plasticity Index % Swell @ 500 psf None % Passing #200 Swell Pressure (psf) <500 Dry Density (pcf) 109.4 SOLOGIC PROPOSED RED BARN DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION WELD COUNTY (MEAD), COLORADO Project # 17-1271 October 2017 SWELL/CONSOLIDATION TEST SUMMARY 12 10 co ale Water e4 % Consolidation -4 -6 -8 -10 -12 10 100 1000 Applied Load (psf) 10000 100000 Sample ID: B-18 @ 4 Sample Description: Brown/Olive/Gray/Rust Siltstone/Sandstone Initial Moisture Final Moisture % Swell @ 500 psf Swell Pressure (psf) 15.1% 19.5% 1.3% 2,400 Liquid Limit Plasticity Index % Passing #200 Dry Density (pcf) 114.5 So`LOGIC PROPOSED RED BARN DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION WELD COUNTY (MEAD), COLORADO Project # 17-1271 October 2017 SWELL/CONSOLIDATION TEST SUMMARY 12 10 8 6 N a 4 2 0 % Consolidation -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 -12 Water Addecj 10 100 1000 Applied Load (psf) 10000 100000 Sample ID: B-18 @ 9 Sample Description: Brown/Olive/Gray/Rust Siltstone/Sandstone Initial Moisture Final Moisture Swell @ 500 psf Swell Pressure (psf) 15.2% 21.6% 1.3% 2,400 Liquid Limit Plasticity Index % Passing #200 Dry Density (pcf) 108.8 SD LoGic PROPOSED RED BARN DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION WELD COUNTY (MEAD), COLORADO Project # 17-1271 October 2017 SWELL/CONSOLIDATION TEST SUMMARY 12 10 8 % Consolidation 0 -2 -4 -10 -12 i NewrAt deal 10 100 1000 Applied Load (psf) 10000 100000 Sample ID: B-19 @ 4 Sample Description: Brown/Red-Brown Lean Clay (CL) with varying amounts of Silt and Sand Initial Moisture 23.8% Liquid Limit Final Moisture 22.3% Plasticity Index % Swell @ 500 psf None % Passing #200 Swell Pressure (psf) <500 Dry Density (pcf) 99.8 SD LOGIC PROPOSED RED BARN DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION WELD COUNTY (MEAD), COLORADO Project # 17-1271 October 2017 SWELL/CONSOLIDATION TEST SUMMARY Sample ID: B-19 @ 9 Sample Description: Brown/Red-Brown Lean Clay (CL) with varying amounts of Silt and Sand Initial Moisture 27.3% Liquid Limit Final Moisture 21.4% Plasticity Index % Swell @ 500 psf None % Passing #200 Swell Pressure (psf) <500 Dry Density (pcf) 95.1 so LOGIC PROPOSED RED BARN DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION WELD COUNTY (MEAD), COLORADO Project # 17-1271 October 2017 SWELL/CONSOLIDATION TEST SUMMARY 12 10 8 m 6 en 4 2 0 21�{ % Consolidation -4 -6 _ -8 -10 _ -12 10 100 1000 Applied Load (psf) 10000 100000 Sample ID: B-20 @ 4 Sample Description: Brown/Red-Brown Lean Clay (CL) with varying amounts of Silt and Sand (Swell Only) Initial Moisture 21.8% Liquid Limit Final Moisture 20.3% Plasticity Index % Swell @ 500 psf None % Passing #200 Swell Pressure (psf) <500 Dry Density (pcf) 106.7 sod LOGIC PROPOSED RED BARN DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION WELD COUNTY (MEAD), COLORADO Project # 17-1271 October 2017 SWELL/CONSOLIDATION TEST SUMMARY Sample ID: B-20 @ 9 Sample Description: Brown/Olive/Gray/Rust Siltstone/Sandstone (Swell Only) Initial Moisture 27.6% Liquid Limit Final Moisture 24.4% Plasticity Index % Swell @ 500 psf None % Passing #200 Swell Pressure (psf) <500 Dry Density (pcf) 94.1 SOLOGIC UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION Criteria for Assigning Group Symbols and Group Names SYSTEM Using Laboratory Tests" Soil Classification Group Symbol Group Name' Coarse Grained Soils Gravels Clean Gravels More than 50% retained More than 50% of coarse Less than 5% fines` fraction retained on Cu ≥ 4 and 1 s Cc 5 3' GW Well graded gravel' Cu < 4 and/or 1 > Cc > 3' GP Poorly graded gravel' on No. 200 sieve No. 4 sieve Gravels with Fines than 12% fines' More Fines classify as ML or MH GM Silty gravel's," Fines classify as CL or CH GC Clayey gravel's," Sands Clean Sands 50% or more of coarse Less than 5% fines" fraction passes Cu ≥ 6 and 1 s Cc 5 3' SW Well graded sand' Cu < 6 and/or 1 > Cc > 3' SP Poorlgraded sand' Y 9 No. 4 sieve Sands with Fines More than 12%fines° Fines classify as ML or MH SM Silty sand'"' Fines classify as CL or CH SC Clayey sander"' Fine -Grained Soils Silts and Clays Inorganic 50% or more passes the Liquid limit less than 50 No. 200 sieve PI > 7 and plots on or above "A" line' CL Lean clay".`"" PI < 4 or plots below "A" line' ML Silt' m Organic Liquid limit - oven 0.75 OL Organic clay"`"'" dried Liquid limit - not Organic silt"<".° dried Silts and Clays Inorganic Liquid limit 50 or more PI plots on or above "A" line CH Fat clay".`"" PI plots below "A" line MH Elastic silt' Organic Liquid limit - oven dried Organic day"`" < 0.75 OH Liquid limit - not dried Organic silt"`""<° Highly organic soils Primarily organic matter, dark in color, and organic odor PT Peat A Based on the material passing the 3 -in. (75 -mm) sieve E If field sample contained cobbles or boulders, or both, add "with cobbles or boulders, or both" to group name. c Gravels with 5 to 12% fines require dual symbols: GW-GM well graded gravel with silt, GW-GC well graded gravel with clay, GP -GM poorly graded gravel with silt, GP -GC poorly graded gravel with clay. °Sands with 5 to 12% fines require dual symbols: SW-SM well graded sand with silt, SW -SC well graded sand with clay, SP-SM poorly graded sand with silt, SP -SC poorly graded sand with clay ECu = D60/D10 Cc = (D30)2 "If fines are organic, add "with organic fines" to group name. ' If soil contains ≥ 15% gravel, add "with gravel" to group name. ' If Atterberg limits plot in shaded area, soil is a CL -ML, silty clay. "If soil contains 15 to 29% plus No. 200, add "with sand" or "with gravel," whichever is predominant. If soil contains ≥ 30% plus No. 200 predominantly sand, add "sandy" to group name. n If soil contains a 30% plus No. 200, predominantly gravel, add "gravelly" to group name. "PI a 4 and plots on or above "A" line. °PI < 4 or plots below "A" line. P PI plots on or above "A" line. °Pl plots below "A" line. f /f ce .J p �� o Cr MH or OH 50 i0 80 gp 100 ti0 LIMIT (LL) D10 X D60 r If soil contains a 15% sand, add "with sand" to group name. °If fines classify as CL -ML, use dual symbol GC -GM, or SC-SM. 60 For classification of fine-grained soils and tine -grained fraction 50 of coarse -grained soils — Equation of 'A" - line o- Horizontal at P1=4 to LL=25-5. X 40 then PI=0.73(LL-201 W O Equation of 'U" - line ? Vertical at LL=16 to Pt=7, f 30 then P1=0.9 (LL -81 H U // ON' R of Cr*". a 10 4 -.. ML or OL 0 10 16 20 30 40 50 LIQUID GENERAL NOTES DRILLING & SAMPLING SYMBOLS: SS: Split Spoon - 1%" I.D., 2" O.D., unless otherwise noted HS: Hollow Stem Auger ST: Thin -Walled Tube — 2.5" O.D., unless otherwise noted PA: Power Auger RS: Ring Sampler - 2.42" I.D., 3" O.D., unless otherwise noted HA: Hand Auger CS: California Barrel - 1.92" I.D., 2.5" O.D., unless otherwise noted RB: Rock Bit BS: Bulk Sample or Auger Sample WB: Wash Boring or Mud Rotary The number of blows required to advance a standard 2 -inch O.D. split -spoon sampler (SS) the last 12 inches of the total 18 -inch penetration with a 140 -pound hammer falling 30 inches is considered the "Standard Penetration" or "N -value". For 2.5" O.D. California Barrel samplers (CB) the penetration value is reported as the number of blows required to advance the sampler 12 inches using a 140 -pound hammer falling 30 inches, reported as "blows per inch," and is not considered equivalent to the "Standard Penetration" or "N -value". WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENT SYMBOLS: WL: Water Level WCI: Wet Cave in DCI: Dry Cave in AB: After Boring WS: While Sampling WD: While Drilling BCR: Before Casing Removal ACR: After Casing Removal Water levels indicated on the boring logs are the levels measured in the borings at the times indicated. Groundwater levels at other times and other locations across the site could vary. In pervious soils, the indicated levels may reflect the location of groundwater. In low permeability soils, the accurate determination of groundwater levels may not be possible with only short-term observations. DESCRIPTIVE SOIL CLASSIFICATION: Soil classification is based on the Unified Classification System. Coarse Grained Soils have more than 50% of their dry weight retained on a #200 sieve; their principal descriptors are: boulders, cobbles, gravel or sand. Fine Grained Soils have less than 50% of their dry weight retained on a #200 sieve; they are principally described as clays if they are plastic, and silts if they are slightly plastic or non -plastic. Major constituents may be added as modifiers and minor constituents may be added according to the relative proportions based on grain size. In addition to gradation, coarse -grained soils are defined on the basis of their in -place relative density and fine-grained soils on the basis of their consistency. FINE-GRAINED SOILS COARSE -GRAINED SOILS BEDROCK 12.13 f SAS f C�6 f SAS Relative fCBl MI Blows/Ft. Blows/Ft. Consistency Blows/Ft. Blows/Ft. Density Blows/Ft. Blows/Ft. Consistenc < 3 0-2 Very Soft 0-5 < 3 Very Loose < 24 < 20 Weathered 3-5 3-4 Soft 6-14 4-9 Loose 24-35 20-29 Firm 6-10 5-8 Medium Stiff 15-46 10-29 Medium Dense 36-60 30-49 Medium Hard 11-18 9-15 Stiff 47-79 30-50 Dense 61-96 50-79 Hard 19-36 16-30 Very Stiff > 79 > 50 Very Dense > 96 > 79 Very Hard > 36 > 30 Hard RELATIVE PROPORTIONS OF SAND AND GRAVEL Descriptive Terms of Percent of Other Constituents Dry Weiqht Trace < 15 With 15 — 29 Modifier > 30 GRAIN SIZE TERMINOLOGY Major Component of Sample Boulders Cobbles Gravel Sand Silt or Clay Particle Size Over 12 in. (300mm) 12 in. to 3 in. (300mm to 75 mm) 3 in. to #4 sieve (75mm to 4.75 mm) #4 to #200 sieve (4.75mm to 0.075mm) Passing #200 Sieve (0.075mm) RELATIVE PROPORTIONS OF FINES PLASTICITY DESCRIPTION Descriptive Terms of Other Constituents Trace With Modifiers Percent of Dry Weight <5 5-12 >12 Term Non -plastic Low Medium High Plasticity Index 0 1-10 11-30 30+ So LOGIC Land Title GUARANTEE COMPANY PREVENT FRAUD - Please remember to call a member of our closing team when initiating a wire transfer or providing wiring instructions. Land Title Guarantee Company Customer Distribution Our Order Number: FCC25154556-3 Date: 01-04-2018 Property Address: VACANT LAND, MEAD, CO 80542 For Closing Assistance Jean Urban 2595 CANYON BLVD #340 BOULDER, CO 80302 720-565-6202 (phone) 866-360-5891 (fax) jurban@ltgc.com Company License: CO44565 Contact License: CO185467 Closer's Assistant Megan Klaus 2595 CANYON BLVD #340 BOULDER, CO 80302 720-406-2084 (phone) 303-393-3942 (fax) mklaus@ltgc.com For Title Assistance Larimer/Weld County Title Team 772 WHALERS WAY #100 FORT COLLINS, CO 80525 970-282-3649 (phone) 970-282-3652 (fax) customercare@ltgc.com PLEASE CONTACT YOUR CLOSER OR CLOSER'S ASSISTANT,FOR WIRE TRANSFER INSTRUCTIONS Buyer/Borrower PROSPER LAND AND DEVELOPMENT LLC Delivered via: Electronic Mail Seller/Owner 13-32 DEVELOPMENT LLC Delivered via: Electronic Mail Attorney for Seller LYONS GADDIS Attention: CAMERON GRANT 515 KIMBARK STREET 2ND FLOOR PO BOX 978 LONGMONT, CO 80502 303-817-8475 (phone) 303-776-9900 (work) 303-776-9100 (work fax) cgrant@lyonsgaddis.com Delivered via: Electronic Mail Attorney for Buyer PACKARD AND DIERKING LLC Attention: REBECCA HALL WATERSTREET 2595 CANYON BLVD #200 BOULDER, CO 80302 303-447-0450 (work) 303-447-0451 (work fax) becky@packarddierking.com Delivered via: Electronic Mail LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY Attention: STAN URBAN 2595 CANYON BLVD #340 BOULDER, CO 80302 303-444-4101 (work) 303-442-7913 (work fax) surban@Itgc.com Delivered via: Electronic Mail PROJECT MANAGER FOR 13-32 DEVELOPMENT, LLC Attention: ANDREW BATSON 303-641-5058 (work) andrew@yourwayhome.com Delivered via: Electronic Mail IP" Land f ltle' GUARAN T E c .1PANY Land Title Guarantee Company Estimate of Title Fees Order Number: FCC25154556-3 Date: 01-04-2018 Property Address: VACANT LAND, MEAD, CO 80542 Buyer/Borrower: PROSPER LAND AND DEVELOPMENT, LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY Seller: 13-32 DEVELOPMENT LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY Visit Land Title's website at www.ltgc.com for directions to any of our offices. ALTA Owners Policy 06-17-06 (Sht Term Rate) Deletion of Standard Exception(s) Tax Certificate $1,481.00 $65.00 $52.00 If Land Title Guarantee Company will be closing this transaction, the fees listed above will be collected at closing. Total $1,598.00 THANK YOU FOR YOUR ORDER! ALTA COMMITMENT Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule A Order Number: FCC25154556-3 Customer Ref -Loan No.: Property Address: VACANT LAND, MEAD, CO 80542 1. Effective Date: 12-27-2017 At 05:00:00 2. Policy to be Issued and Proposed Insured: "ALTA" Owner's Policy 06-17-06 Proposed Insured: PROSPER LAND AND DEVELOPMENT, LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY $1,054,100.00 3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment and covered herein is: A FEE SIMPLE 4. Title to the estate or interest covered herein is at the effective date hereof vested in: 13-32 DEVELOPMENT LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 5. The Land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: PARCEL A LOT D, RECORDED EXEMPTION NO. 1207-24-01 RECX17-0048, RECORDED AUGUST 9, 2017 AT RECEPTION NO. 4325830, BEING A PART OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO PARCEL B LOT B, RECORDED EXEMPTION NO. 1207-24-04 RECX17-0097, RECORDED OCTOBER 19, 2017 AT RECEPTION NO. 4345567, BEING A PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO Copyright 2006-2018 American Land Title Association. All Rights Reserved The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. AMF RI( AN ALTA COMMITMENT Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule B, Part I (Requirements) Order Number: FCC25154556-3 The following are the requirements must be met: This proposed Insured must notify the Company in writing of the name of any party not referred to in this Commitment who will obtain an interest in the Land or who will make a loan on the Land. The Company may then make additional Requirements or Exceptions. Pay the agreed amount for the estate or interest to be insured. Pay the premiums, fees, and charges for the Policy to the Company. Documents satisfactory to the Company that convey the Title or create the Mortgage to be insured, or both, must be properly authorized, executed, delivered, and recorded in the Public Records. 1. (ITEM INTENTIONALLY DELETED) 2. (ITEM INTENTIONALLY DELETED) 3. (ITEM INTENTIONALLY DELETED) NOTE: STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY FOR 13-32 DEVELOPMENT LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY RECORDED DECEMBER 28, 2017 AT RECEPTION NO. 4363508 AUTHORIZES JON BENSON AND/OR CYNDI BENSON AS MEMBERS. 4. A FULL COPY OF THE FULLY EXECUTED OPERATING AGREEMENT AND ANY AND ALL AMENDMENTS THERETO FOR 13-32 DEVELOPMENT LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY MUST BE FURNISHED TO LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY. SAID AGREEMENT MUST DISCLOSE WHO MAY CONVEY, ACQUIRE, ENCUMBER, LEASE OR OTHERWISE DEAL WITH INTERESTS IN REAL PROPERTY FOR SAID ENTITY. NOTE: ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MAY BE NECESSARY UPON REVIEW OF THIS DOCUMENTATION. 5. DULY EXECUTED AND ACKNOWLEDGED STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY SETTING FORTH THE NAME OF PROSPER LAND AND DEVELOPMENT, LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AS A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY. THE STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY MUST STATE UNDER WHICH LAWS THE ENTITY WAS CREATED, THE MAILING ADDRESS OF THE ENTITY, AND THE NAME AND POSITION OF THE PERSON(S) AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE INSTRUMENTS CONVEYING, ENCUMBERING, OR OTHERWISE AFFECTING TITLE TO REAL PROPERTY ON BEHALF OF THE ENTITY AND OTHERWISE COMPLYING WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 38-30-172, CRS. NOTE: THE STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY MUST BE RECORDED WITH THE CLERK AND RECORDER. 6. A FULL COPY OF THE FULLY EXECUTED OPERATING AGREEMENT AND ANY AND ALL AMENDMENTS THERETO FOR PROSPER LAND AND DEVELOPMENT, LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY MUST BE FURNISHED TO LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY. SAID AGREEMENT MUST DISCLOSE WHO MAY CONVEY, ACQUIRE, ENCUMBER, LEASE OR OTHERWISE DEAL WITH INTERESTS IN REAL PROPERTY FOR SAID ENTITY. NOTE: ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MAY BE NECESSARY UPON REVIEW OF THIS DOCUMENTATION. 7. WRITTEN CONFIRMATION THAT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY FOR ALTA COMMITMENT Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule B, Part I (Requirements) Order Number: FCC25154556-3 The following are the requirements must be met: COPPER HOMES LIMITED, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY RECORDED DECEMBER 05, 2016 AT RECEPTION NO. 4258905 IS CURRENT. NOTE: SAID INSTRUMENT DISCLOSES ANDREW BATSON, AS MANAGER AND/OR KIM CALLAHAN, AS AUTHORIZED AGENT AS AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE INSTRUMENTS CONVEYING, ENCUMBERING OR OTHERWISE AFFECTING TITLE TO REAL PROPERTY ON BEHALF OF SAID ENTITY. IF THIS INFORMATION IS NOT ACCURATE, A CURRENT STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY MUST BE RECORDED. 8. (ITEM INTENTIONALLY DELETED) 9. (ITEM INTENTIONALLY DELETED) 10. WARRANTY DEED FROM 13-32 DEVELOPMENT LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY TO PROSPER LAND AND DEVELOPMENT, LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY CONVEYING SUBJECT PROPERTY. NOTE: ALL PARTIES WILL BE REQUIRED TO SIGN A SATISFACTORY LIEN AFFIDAVIT AT CLOSING. 11. PROVIDE LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY WITH A CURRENT ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY OF SUBJECT PROPERTY. UPON REVIEW, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS AND/OR EXCEPTIONS MAY BE NECESSARY. LAND TITLE IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ORDERING SAID ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY. (AFFECTS PARCEL B) 12. RELEASE OF DEED OF TRUST DATED DECEMBER 15, 2017 FROM 13-32 DEVELOPMENT LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY TO THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF WELD COUNTY FOR THE USE OF FLATIRON MORTGAGE LENDING, LLC TO SECURE THE SUM OF $1,283,638.00 RECORDED DECEMBER 27, 2017, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 4363285. (AFFECTS PARCEL B) 13. RELEASE OF DEED OF TRUST DATED DECEMBER 15. 2017 FROM 13-32 DEVELOPMENT LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY TO THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF WELD COUNTY FOR THE USE OF ARB 2011, LLC TO SECURE THE SUM OF $4,318,585.00 RECORDED DECEMBER 28, 2017, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 4363509. (AFFECTS PARCEL A) NOTE: ITEMS 1-3 OF THE STANDARD EXCEPTIONS WILL BE DELETED UPON RECEIPT OF AN APPROVED SURVEY. MATTERS DISCLOSED BY SAID SURVEY MAY BE ADDED TO SCHEDULE B-2 HEREOF. NOTE: UPON THE APPROVAL OF THE COMPANY AND THE RECEIPT OF A NOTARIZED FINAL LIEN AFFIDAVIT, ITEM NO. 4 OF THE STANDARD EXCEPTIONS ON THE LOAN POLICY WILL BE DELETED. UPON THE APPROVAL OF THE COMPANY AND THE RECEIPT OF A NOTARIZED FINAL LIEN AFFIDAVIT, ITEM NO. 4 OF THE STANDARD EXCEPTIONS ON THE OWNER'S POLICY, WILL BE AMENDED AS ALTA COMMITMENT Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule B, Part I (Requirements) Order Number: FCC25154556-3 The following are the requirements must be met: FOLLOWS: ITEM NO. 4 OF THE STANDARD EXCEPTIONS IS DELETED AS TO ANY LIENS OR FUTURE LIENS RESULTING FROM WORK OR MATERIAL FURNISHED AT THE SPECIFIC, DIRECT REQUEST, AND WITH THE ACTUAL KNOWLEDGE OF 13-32 DEVELOPMENT LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY. OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SHALL HAVE NO LIABILITY FOR ANY LIENS ARISING FROM WORK OR MATERIAL FURNISHED AT THE SPECIFIC, DIRECT REQUEST, AND WITH THE ACTUAL KNOWLEDGE OF PROSPER LAND AND DEVELOPMENT, LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY. NOTE: ITEM 5 OF THE STANDARD EXCEPTIONS WILL BE DELETED IF LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY CONDUCTS THE CLOSING OF THE CONTEMPLATED TRANSACTION(S) AND RECORDS THE DOCUMENTS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH. NOTE: UPON PROOF OF PAYMENT OF ALL TAXES, ITEM 6 WILL BE AMENDED TO READ: TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS FOR THE YEAR 2018 AND SUBSEQUENT YEARS. Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule B, Part II (Exceptions) Order Number: FCC25154556-3 This commitment does not republish any covenants, condition, restriction, or limitation contained in any document referred to in this commitment to the extent that the specific covenant, conditions, restriction, or limitation violates state or federal law based on race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, handicap, familial status, or national origin. 1. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records but that could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or that may be asserted by persons in possession of the Land. 2. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records. 3. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public Records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the Public Records. 5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date of the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6. (a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. 7. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water. 8. RIGHT OF WAY FOR COUNTY ROADS 30 FEET ON EITHER SIDE OF SECTION AND TOWNSHIP LINES, AS ESTABLISHED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR WELD COUNTY, RECORDED OCTOBER 14, 1889 IN BOOK 86 AT PAGE 273. 9. RIGHT OF PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE THEREFROM SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PREMISES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED JULY 02 1877, IN BOOK 20 AT PAGE 160. 10. RIGHT OF WAY FOR HOWLETT DITCH AS DISCLOSED BY MAP AND STATEMENT RECORDED OCTOBER 21, 1910 AT RECEPTION NO. 160054. 11. RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT AS GRANTED TO AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH CO. IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED NOVEMBER 27, 1936, AT RECEPTION NO. 751621, IN BOOK 1002 AT PAGE 16. 12. RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT AS GRANTED TO UNION RURAL ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC. IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED NOVEMBER 18, 1969, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 1539384. 13. OIL AND GAS LEASE RECORDED SEPTEMBER 29, 1970 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 1555404 AND ANY AND ALL ASSIGNMENTS THEREOF, OR INTEREST THEREIN. Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule B, Part II (Exceptions) Order Number: FCC25154556-3 DECLARATION OF POOLING RECORDED MAY 30, 2014 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 4019827 AND 4019829 14. RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT AS GRANTED TO PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPE LINE COMPANY IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED FEBRUARY 19, 1974, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 1630459. 15. RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT AS GRANTED TO THE MOUNTAIN STATES TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED JUNE 09, 1980, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 1826880. 16. RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT AS GRANTED TO NORTHERN COLORADO WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 21, 1995, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 2456523. 17. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF EASEMENT, RIGHT-OF-WAY AND SURFACE USE AGREEMENT RECORDED NOVEMBER 04, 1999 AT RECEPTION NO. 2730990. 18. EASEMENTS, CONDITIONS, COVENANTS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS AND NOTES ON THE PLAT OF 120724 -1 -RE -2478 RECORDED NOVEMBER 18, 1999 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 2733405. 19. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF NOTICE OF OIL AND GAS INTEREST AND SURFACE USE RECORDED DECEMBER 12, 2000 AT RECEPTION NO. 2812800. 20. REQUEST FOR NOTIFICATION OF SURFACE DEVELOPMENT AS EVIDENCED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED OCTOBER 15, 2001 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 2891983. 21. RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT AS GRANTED TO KERR-MCGEE GATHERING, LLC IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED NOVEMBER 27, 2002, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 3009886. 22. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF SURFACE USE AGREEMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 27, 2006 AT RECEPTION NO. 3422709 AND AMENDMENT RECORDED JANUARY 21, 2014 AT RECEPTION NO. 3991196. 23. RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT AS GRANTED TO KINDER MORGAN INC. IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED DECEMBER 11, 2006, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 3440909. 24. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF AGREEMENT REGARDING EASEMENTS RECORDED JANUARY 04, 2011 AT RECEPTION NO. 3742916. 25. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF NOTICE OF PIPELINE LOCATION RECORDED NOVEMBER 17, 2011 AT RECEPTION NO. 3806210. 26. CONVEYANCE OF MINERALS AND MINERAL RIGHTS AS CONTAINED IN DEED RECORDED SEPTEMBER 2, 2014 AT RECEPTION NO. 4042770 AND ANY AND ALL INTERESTS THEREIN OR RIGHTS THEREUNDER. 27. RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT AS GRANTED TO KERR-MCGEE GATHERING, LLC IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED OCTOBER 26, 2015, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 4153024. 28. RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT AS GRANTED TO KERR-MCGEE GATHERING, LLC IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED OCTOBER 30, 2015, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 4154451. Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule B, Part II (Exceptions) Order Number: FCC25154556-3 29. (ITEM INTENTIONALLY DELETED) 30. RESERVATION OF MINERALS AND MINERAL RIGHTS AS CONTAINED IN DEED RECORDED SEPTEMBER 21, 2016 AT RECEPTION NO. 4238415 AND ANY AND ALL INTERESTS THEREIN OR RIGHTS THEREUNDER. 31. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF SHARED ACCESS AND ACCESS ROAD EASEMENT AGREEMENT RECORDED MAY 23, 2017 AT RECEPTION NO. 4304436. 32. EASEMENTS, CONDITIONS, COVENANTS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS AND NOTES ON THE PLAT OF RECORDED EXEMPTION NO. 1207-24-01 RECX17-0048 RECORDED AUGUST 09, 2017 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 4325830. 33. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF UTILITY EASEMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 26, 2017 AT RECEPTION NO. 4338219. EXCEPTIONS 9 THROUGH 33 AFFECT PARCEL A 34. OIL AND GAS LEASE RECORDED OCTOBER 04, 1972 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 1598914 AND ANY AND ALL ASSIGNMENTS THEREOF, OR INTEREST THEREIN. DECLARATION OF POOLING RECORDED MAY 30, 2014 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 4019827 AND 4019828. 35. RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT AS GRANTED TO THE MOUNTAIN STATES TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED MAY 02, 1980, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 1823960. 36. RESERVATION OF MINERALS AND MINERAL RIGHTS AS CONTAINED IN DEED RECORDED JUNE 23, 1981 AT RECEPTION NO. 1861342 AND ANY AND ALL INTERESTS THEREIN OR RIGHTS THEREUNDER. 37. RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT AS GRANTED TO NORTHERN COLORADO WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED JUNE 19, 1995, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 2442940. 38. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF NOTICE OF OIL AND GAS INTEREST AND SURFACE USE RECORDED DECEMBER 12, 2000 AT RECEPTION NO. 2812804. 39. REQUEST FOR NOTIFICATION OF SURFACE DEVELOPMENT AS EVIDENCED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED OCTOBER 15, 2001 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 2891989. 40. EASEMENTS, CONDITIONS, COVENANTS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS AND NOTES ON THE PLAT OF RECORDED EXEMPTION NO. 1207-24-04 RE -4216 RECORDED OCTOBER 20, 2005 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 3333210. 41. RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT AS GRANTED TO KINDER MORGAN IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED DECEMBER 11, 2006, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 3440918. 42. (ITEM INTENTIONALLY DELETED) 43. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT AGREEMENT RECORDED Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule B, Part II (Exceptions) Order Number: FCC25154556-3 JANUARY 04, 2011 AT RECEPTION NO. 3742915. 44. RESERVATION OF MINERALS AND MINERAL RIGHTS AS CONTAINED IN DEED RECORDED OCTOBER 22, 2015 AT RECEPTION NO. 4152317 AND ANY AND ALL INTERESTS THEREIN OR RIGHTS THEREUNDER. 45. EASEMENTS, CONDITIONS, COVENANTS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS AND NOTES ON THE PLAT OF RECORDED EXEMPTION NO. 1207-24-04 RECX17-0097 RECORDED OCTOBER 19, 2017 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 4345567. EXCEPTIONS 33 THROUGH 45 AFFECT PARCEL B 46. REQUEST FOR NOTIFICATION OF SURFACE DEVELOPMENT AS EVIDENCED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED DECEMBER 21, 2007 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 3525268. 47. ANY TAX, LIEN, FEE, OR ASSESSMENT BY REASON OF INCLUSION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY IN THE NORTHERN COLORADO WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT, AS EVIDENCED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 29, 2010, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 3721790. 48. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF THIRTY FOOT ACCESS EASEMENT RECORDED OCTOBER 13, 2017 AT RECEPTION NO. 4343941. EXCEPTIONS 8 AND 46 THROUGH 48 AND THE NOTE BELOW AFFECT PARCELS AAND B NOTE: THE FOLLOWING NOTICES PURSUANT TO CRS 9-1.5-103 CONCERNING UNDERGROUND FACILITIES HAVE BEEN FILED WITH THE CLERK AND RECORDER. THESE STATEMENTS ARE GENERAL AND DO NOT NECESSARILY GIVE NOTICE OF UNDERGROUND FACILITIES WITHIN THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: (A) MOUNTAIN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, RECORDED OCTOBER 1, 1981 AT RECEPTION NO. 1870705. (B) WESTERN SLOPE GAS COMPANY, RECORDED MARCH 9, 1983 AT RECEPTION NO. 1919757. (C) ASSOCIATED NATURAL GAS, INC., RECORDED JULY 20, 1984 AT RECEPTION NO. 1974810 AND RECORDED OCTOBER 1, 1984 AT RECEPTION NO. 1983584 AND RECORDED MARCH 3, 1988 AT RECEPTION NO. 2132709 AND RECORDED APRIL 10, 1989 AT RECEPTION NO. 2175917. (D) PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPE LINE COMPANY, RECORDED OCTOBER 1, 1981 AT RECEPTION NO. 1870756 AND RECORDED JUNE 26, 1986 AT RECEPTION NO. 2058722. (E) COLORADO INTERSTATE GAS COMPANY, RECORDED AUGUST 31, 1984 AT RECEPTION NO. 1979784. (F) UNION RURAL ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC., RECORDED OCTOBER 5, 1981 AT RECEPTION NO. 1871004. (G) WESTERN GAS SUPPLY COMPANY, RECORDED APRIL 2, 1985 AT RECEPTION NO. 2004300. (H) PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO, RECORDED NOVEMBER 9, 1981 AT RECEPTION NO. 1874084. (I) ST. VRAIN SANITATION DISTRICT, RECORDED DECEMBER 14, 1988 AT RECEPTION NO. 2164975. (J) LEFT HAND WATER DISTRICT, RECORDED AUGUST 28, 1990 AT RECEPTION NO. 2224977. (K) UNITED POWER, INC., RECORDED JANUARY 24, 1991 AT RECEPTION NO. 2239296. (L) WIGGINS TELEPHONE ASSOCIATION RECORDED OCTOBER 14, 1992 AT RECEPTION NO. 2306829. 49. THE EFFECT OF ORDINANCE NO. 812 RECORDED SEPTEMBER 6, 2017 AT RECEPTION NO. 4333082 AND MAP RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO. 4333083. Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule B, Part II (Exceptions) Order Number: FCC25154556-3 (AFFECTS PARCEL B) 50. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF ORDINANCE NO. 813 RECORDED SEPTEMBER 06, 2017 AT RECEPTION NO. 4333084 AND MAP RECORDED SEPTEMBER 6, 2017 AT RECEPTION NO. 4333085. (AFFECTS PARCEL B) 51. ANY FACTS, RIGHTS, INTERESTS OR CLAIMS WHICH MAY EXIST OR ARISE BY REASON OF THE FOLLOWING FACTS SHOWN ON ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY CERTIFIED NOVEMBER 29, 2017 PREPARED BY CHL ENGINEERING & SURVEYING, JOB #17-1095: A. ACCESS ROAD, AGRICULTURAL DITCH, WATER VALVE ENCLOSURE AREA B. OIL/GAS FACILITIES C. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WERE NOT LOCATED (SAID DOCUMENT STORED AS OUR ESI 34940337, PAGES 1-3) (AFFECTS PARCEL A) 52. ANY AND ALL RIGHTS OF THE HOWLETT DITCH COMPANY OR DITCH OPERATOR RELATING TO HOWLETT DITCH, WHICH TRAVERSES SUBJECT PROPERTY OR IS DESCRIBED AS A BOUNDARY OF SUBJECT PROPERTY, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO DITCH MAINTENANCE AND ACCESS RIGHTS TO LANDS ADJOINING THE DITCH, AS DISCLOSED BY ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY DATED NOVEMBER 29, 2017 BY CHL ENGINEERING & SURVEYING, JOB #17-1095. (AFFECTS PARCELS AAND B) 53. ANY FACTS, RIGHTS, INTERESTS OR CLAIMS WHICH MAY EXIST OR ARISE BY REASON OF THE FOLLOWING FACTS SHOWN ON ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY CERTIFIED PREPARED BY CHL ENGINEERING & SURVEYING, JOB #17-1095: A. FENCES DO NOT COINCIDE WITH THE PROPERTY LINES B. AGRICULTURAL DITCH C. UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES WERE NOT LOCATED (AFFECTS PARCEL B) Land Title r wetaert c€ tmAr54*4v -: JOINT NOTICE OF PRIVACY POLICY OF LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY OF SUMMIT COUNTY LAND TITLE INSURANCE CORPORATION AND OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY This Statement is provided to you as a customer of Land Title Guarantee Company and Meridian Land Title, LLC, as agents for Land Title Insurance Corporation and Old Republic National Title Insurance Company. We want you to know that we recognize and respect your privacy expectations and the requirements of federal and state privacy laws. Information security is one of our highest priorities. We recognize that maintaining your trust and confidence is the bedrock of our business. We maintain and regularly review internal and external safeguards against unauthorized access to non-public personal information ("Personal Information"). In the course of our business, we may collect Personal Information about you from: ► applications or other forms we receive from you, including communications sent through TMX, our web -based transaction management system; ► your transactions with, or from the services being performed by, us, our affiliates, or others; ► a consumer reporting agency, if such information is provided to us in connection with your transaction; and N. the public records maintained by governmental entities that we either obtain directly from those entities, or from our affiliates and non -affiliates. Our policies regarding the protection of the confidentiality and security of your Personal Information are as follows: ► We restrict access to all Personal Information about you to those employees who need to know that information in order to provide products and services to you. ► We maintain physical, electronic and procedural safeguards that comply with federal standards to protect your Personal Information from unauthorized access or intrusion. ► Employees who violate our strict policies and procedures regarding privacy are subject to disciplinary action. ► We regularly access security standards and procedures to protect against unauthorized access to Personal Information. WE DO NOT DISCLOSE ANY PERSONAL INFORMATION ABOUT YOU WITH ANYONE FOR ANY PURPOSE THAT IS NOT PERMITTED BY LAW. Consistent with applicable privacy laws, there are some situations in which Personal Information may be disclosed. We may disclose your Personal Information when you direct or give us permission; when we are required by law to do so, for example, if we are served a subpoena; or when we suspect fraudulent or criminal activities. We also may disclose your Personal Information when otherwise permitted by applicable privacy laws such as, for example, when disclosure is needed to enforce our rights arising out of any agreement, transaction or relationship with you. Our policy regarding dispute resolution is as follows. Any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to our privacy policy, or the breach thereof, shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration Association, and judgment upon the award rendered by the arbitrator(s) may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. Land Title GUARANTEE COMPANY LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-11-122, notice is hereby given that: A) The Subject real property may be located in a special taxing district. B) A certificate of taxes due listing each taxing jurisdiction will be obtained from the county treasurer of the county in which the real property is located or that county treasurer's authorized agent unless the proposed insured provides written instructions to the contrary. (for an Owner's Policy of Title Insurance pertaining to a sale of residential real property) C) The information regarding special districts and the boundaries of such districts may be obtained from the Board of County Commissioners, the County Clerk and Recorder, or the County Assessor. Note: Effective September 1, 1997, CRS 30-10-406 requires that all documents received for recording or filing in the clerk and recorder's office shall contain a top margin of at least one inch and a left, right and bottom margin of at least one half of an inch. The clerk and recorder may refuse to record or file any document that does not conform, except that, the requirement for the top margin shall not apply to documents using forms on which space is provided for recording or filing information at the top margin of the document. Note: Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 8-1-2 requires that "Every title entity shall be responsible for all matters which appear of record prior to the time of recording whenever the title entity conducts the closing and is responsible for recording or filing of legal documents resulting from the transaction which was closed". Provided that Land Title Guarantee Company conducts the closing of the insured transaction and is responsible for recording the legal documents from the transaction, exception number 5 will not appear on the Owner's Title Policy and the Lenders Policy when issued. Note: Affirmative mechanic's lien protection for the Owner may be available (typically by deletion of Exception no. 4 of Schedule B-2 of the Commitment from the Owner's Policy to be issued) upon compliance with the following conditions: A) The land described in Schedule A of this commitment must be a single family residence which includes a condominium or townhouse unit. B) No labor or materials have been furnished by mechanics or material -men for purposes of construction on the land described in Schedule A of this Commitment within the past 6 months. C) The Company must receive an appropriate affidavit indemnifying the Company against un-filed mechanic's and material -men's liens. D) The Company must receive payment of the appropriate premium. E) If there has been construction, improvements or major repairs undertaken on the property to be purchased within six months prior to the Date of the Commitment, the requirements to obtain coverage for unrecorded liens will include: disclosure of certain construction information; financial information as to the seller, the builder and or the contractor; payment of the appropriate premium fully executed Indemnity Agreements satisfactory to the company, and, any additional requirements as may be necessary after an examination of the aforesaid information by the Company. No coverage will be given under any circumstances for labor or material for which the insured has contracted for or agreed to pay. Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-11-123, notice is hereby given: This notice applies to owner's policy commitments disclosing that a mineral estate has been severed from the surface estate, in Schedule B-2. A) That there is recorded evidence that a mineral estate has been severed, leased, or otherwise conveyed from the surface estate and that there is a substantial likelihood that a third party holds some or all interest in oil, gas, other minerals, or geothermal energy in the property; and B) That such mineral estate may include the right to enter and use the property without the surface owner's permission. Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-1-128(6)(a), It is unlawful to knowingly provide false, incomplete, or misleading facts or information to an insurance company for the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the company. Penalties may include imprisonment, fines, denial of insurance, and civil damages. Any insurance company or agent of an insurance company who knowingly provides false, incomplete, or misleading facts or information to a policyholder or claimant for the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the policyholder or claimant with regard to a settlement or award payable from insurance proceeds shall be reported to the Colorado Division of Insurance within the Department of Regulatory Agencies. Note: Pursuant to Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 8-1-3, notice is hereby given of the availability of a closing protection letter for the lender, purchaser, lessee or seller in connection with this transaction. Commitment For Title Insurance Issued by OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY NOTICE IMPORTANT —READ CAREFULLY: THIS COMMITMENT IS AN OFFER TO ISSUE ONE OR MORE TITLE INSURANCE POLICIES. ALL CLAIMS OR REMEDIES SOUGHT AGAINST THE COMPANY INVOLVING THE CONTENT OF THIS COMMITMENT OR THE POLICY MUST BE BASED SOLELY IN CONTRACT. THIS COMMITMENT IS NOT AN ABSTRACT OF TITLE, REPORT OF THE CONDITION OF TITLE, LEGAL OPINION, OPINION OF TITLE, OR OTHER REPRESENTATION OF THE STATUS OF TITLE. THE PROCEDURES USED BY THE COMPANY TO DETERMINE INSURABILITY OF THE TITLE, INCLUDING ANY SEARCH AND EXAMINATION, ARE PROPRIETARY TO THE COMPANY, WERE PERFORMED SOLELY FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE COMPANY, AND CREATE NO EXTRACONTRACTUAL LIABILITY TO ANY PERSON, INCLUDING A PROPOSED INSURED. THE COMPANY'S OBLIGATION UNDER THIS COMMITMENT IS TO ISSUE A POLICY TO A PROPOSED INSURED IDENTIFIED IN SCHEDULE A IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS OF THIS COMMITMENT. THE COMPANY HAS NO LIABILITY OR OBLIGATION INVOLVING THE CONTENT OF THIS COMMITMENT TO ANY OTHER PERSON. COMMITMENT TO ISSUE POLICY Subject to the Notice; Schedule B, Part I —Requirements; Schedule B, Part II —Exceptions; and the Commitment Conditions, Old republic National Title Insurance Company, A Minnesota corporation (the "Company"), commits to issue the Policy according to the terms and provisions of this Commitment. This Commitment is effective as of the Commitment Date shown in Schedule A for each Policy described in Schedule A, only when the Company has entered in Schedule A both the specified dollar amount as the Proposed Policy Amount and the name of the Proposed Insured. If all of the Schedule B, Part I —Requirements have not been met within 6 months after the Commitment Date, this Commitment terminates and the Company's liability and obligation end. COMMITMENT CONDITIONS 1. DEFINITIONS (a) "Knowledge" or "Known": Actual or imputed knowledge, but not constructive notice imparted by the Public Records. (b) "Land": The land described in Schedule A and affixed improvements that by law constitute real property. The term "Land" does not include any property beyond the lines of the area described in Schedule A, nor any right, title, interest, estate, or easement in abutting streets, roads, avenues,alleys, lanes, ways, or waterways, but this does not modify or limit the extent that a right of access to and from the Land is to be insured by the Policy. (c) "Mortgage": A mortgage, deed of trust, or other security instrument, including one evidenced by electronic means authorized by law. (d) "Policy": Each contract of title insurance, in a form adopted by the American Land Title Association, issued or to be issued by the Company pursuant to this Commitment. (e) "Proposed Insured": Each person identified in Schedule A as the Proposed Insured of each Policy to be issued pursuant to this Commitment. (f) "Proposed Policy Amount": Each dollar amount specified in Schedule A as the Proposed Policy Amount of each Policy to be issued pursuant to this Commitment. (g) "Public Records": Records established under state statutes at the Commitment Date for the purpose of imparting constructive notice of matters relating to real property to purchasers for value and without Knowledge. (h) "Title": The estate or interest described in Schedule A. 2. If all of the Schedule B, Part I —Requirements have not been met within the time period specified in the Commitment to Issue Policy, Comitment terminates and the Company's liability and obligation end. 3. The Company's liability and obligation is limited by and this Commitment is not valid without: (a) the Notice; (b) the Commitment to Issue Policy; (c) the Commitment Conditions; (d) Schedule A; (e) Schedule B, Part I —Requirements; [and] (f) Schedule B, Part II —Exceptions[; and (g) a counter -signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form. Issued by: Land Title Guarantee Company 3033 East First Avenue Suite 600 Denver, Colorado 80206 303-321-1880 Authorized Officer or Agent 4. COMPANY'S RIGHT TO AMEND The Company may amend this Commitment at any time. If the Company amends this Commitment to add a defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim, or other matter recorded in the Public Records prior to the Commitment Date, any liability of the Company is limited by Commitment Condition 5. The Company shall not be liable for any other amendment to this Commitment. 5. LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY (a) The Company's liability under Commitment Condition 4 is limited to the Proposed Insured's actual expense incurred in the interval between the Company's delivery to the Proposed Insured of the Commitment and the delivery of the amended Commitment, resulting from the Proposed Insured's good faith reliance to: (I) comply with the Schedule B, Part I —Requirements; (ii) eliminate, with the Company's written consent, any Schedule B, Part II —Exceptions; or (iii) acquire the Title or create the Mortgage covered by this Commitment. (b) The Company shall not be liable under Commitment Condition 5(a) if the Proposed Insured requested the amendment or had Knowledge of the matter and did not notify the Company about it in writing. (c) The Company will only have liability under Commitment Condition 4 if the Proposed Insured would not have incurred the expense had the Commitment included the added matter when the Commitment was first delivered to the Proposed Insured. (d) The Company's liability shall not exceed the lesser of the Proposed Insured's actual expense incurred in good faith and described in Commitment Conditions 5(a)(i) through 5(a)(iii) or the Proposed Policy Amount. (e) The Company shall not be liable for the content of the Transaction Identification Data, if any. (f) In no event shall the Company be obligated to issue the Policy referred to in this Commitment unless all of the Schedule B, Part I —Requirements have been met to the satisfaction of the Company. (g) In any event, the Company's liability is limited by the terms and provisions of the Policy. LIABILITY OF THE COMPANY MUST BE BASED ON THIS COMMITMENT (a) Only a Proposed Insured identified in Schedule A, and no other person, may make a claim under this Commitment. (b) Any claim must be based in contract and must be restricted solely to the terms and provisions of this Commitment. (c) Until the Policy is issued, this Commitment, as last revised, is the exclusive and entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter of this Commitment and supersedes all prior commitment negotiations, representations, and proposals of any kind, whether written or oral, express or implied, relating to the subject matter of this Commitment. (d) The deletion or modification of any Schedule B, Part II —Exception does not constitute an agreement or obligation to provide coverage beyond the terms and provisions of this Commitment or the Policy. (e) Any amendment or endorsement to this Commitment must be in writing [and authenticated by a person authorized by the Company]. (f) When the Policy is issued, all liability and obligation under this Commitment will end and the Company's only liability will be under the Policy. 7. IF THIS COMMITMENT HAS BEEN ISSUED BY AN ISSUING AGENT The issuing agent is the Company's agent only for the limited purpose of issuing tide insurance commitments and policies. The issuing agent is not the Company's agent for the purpose of providing closing or settlement services. 8. PRO -FORMA POLICY The Company may provide, at the request of a Proposed Insured, a pro -forma policy illustrating the coverage that the Company may provide. A pro -forma policy neither reflects the status of Title at the time that the pro -forma policy is delivered to a Proposed Insured, nor is it a commitment to insure. 9. ARBITRATION The Policy contains an arbitration clause. All arbitrable matters when the Proposed Policy Amount is $2,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Proposed Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. A Proposed Insured may review a copy of the arbitration rules at htto://www.alta.org/arbitration. Old Republic National Title Insurance Company a Stock Company 400 Second Avenue South , , Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 wt, TITLE' i (612)371-1111 .O * * ti45 .13 . U * a MaBiy Prerksidentlbre Rande Yeager Secretary AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA* Commitment for Title Insurance Old Republic National Title Insurance Company. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions Schedule A; Schedule B, Part I —Requirements; and Schedule B, Part ll—Exceptionsf; and a counter -signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form] Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. At other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. DELICH ASSOCIATES Traffic & Transportation Engineering 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, Colorado 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 MEMORANDUM TO: Kari McDowell Schroeder, Mead Traffic Engineering Consultant Aurora Charlton, Rocky Ridge Civil Engineering FROM: Matt Delich DATE: March 14, 2018 SUBJECT: L Red Barn Subdivision Transportation Impact Study Addendum — Impact of 13 Estate Lots (File: 1807ME01) This memorandum documents requested analyses related to initial development of 13 Estate Lots in the Red Barn Subdivision. The "Red Barn Subdivision Transportation Impact Study" (TIS), March 2018, is being submitted with this addendum. Figure 1 shows the site plan for the Red Barn Subdivision and the 13 Estate Lots. Seven lots will access Colorado Boulevard via a driveway that will become Harvest Moon Road in the future. Six lots will access WCR32 via a driveway that will become Harvest Moon Road in the future. Table 1 shows the expected trip generation on a daily and peak hour basis for the initial 13 Estate Lots of Red Barn Subdivision. The 13 Estate Lots will generate 120 daily trip ends, 10 morning peak hour trip ends, and 12 afternoon peak hour trip ends, as shown in the cited TIS. 210 Estate Lots 13 D.U. TABLE 1 Trip Generation Figure 2 shows the site generated peak hour traffic at the key intersections for the 13 Estate Lots. Figure 3 shows the short range (2023) total peak hour traffic at the key intersections. EQ 120 EQ EQ 7 EQ 8 EQ 4 The Town of Mead uses the Colorado State Highway Access Code (SHAC) for auxiliary lane evaluation. Colorado Boulevard and WCR32 are considered to be NR -B roads. The auxiliary lane requirements for NR -B roads (at greater than 40 mph) is: left -turn deceleration lane — greater than 10 vehicles per hour (vph) and right -turn deceleration lane — greater than 25 vph. The resulting short range (2023) total peak hour traffic, with the 13 Estate Lots, does not cause any additional auxiliary lane requirements or improvements. Do not hesitate to contact me if there are questions or if additional information is required. SCALE: 1"=400' CR 32 (100' ROW) SITE PLAN - 13 Estate Lots EXISTING 30' ACCESS ROW - E ACCESS, A%MENT Figure 1 L-DELICH -7 / I -ASSOCIATES Red Barn Subdivision TIS Addendum, March 2018 1/0 (10%) E. Frontage R WCR32 0/1 (10%)--\ AM/PM (trip distribution) 0 1/3 (35%) rf 22(35%)� oo �n O N N f0 a) 0 O M N N 9 CO O N Driveway 1/1 (20%) 3/1 (35%) —\ CO CO M 1/2 (20%) SH66 1/3 (30%) SITE GENERATED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC FOR 13 ESTATE LOTS Figure 2 -//LDELICH =ASSOCIATES Red Barn Subdivision TIS Addendum, March 2018 co ON U ch f o v CO r M (f) c0 N 12/25 16/19 2/0 AM/PM WCR32 14/82 i 0/1 T (0 J O Driveway CO (D .0) m 6/68 2/6 - 8/10 -\ N 1/1 3/1 -\ CS CO CO N- r•tt CO f O N 0 N O 14/39 760/592 77/55 SH66 16/148 -/ 398/708 i 52/103 O cc (0 O O U SHORT RANGE (2023) TOTAL PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC FOR 13 ESTATE LOTS Figure 3 -mil L-DELICH -7/ I -ASSOCIATES Red Barn Subdivision TIS Addendum, March 2018 RED BARN SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY MEAD, COLORADO MARCH 2018 Prepared for: Rocky Ridge Civil Engineering 420 21st Street, Suite 101 Longmont, CO 80501 Prepared by: DELICH ASSOCIATES 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: 970-669-2061 FAX: 970-669-5034 Project #1807 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS 2 Land Use 2 Streets 2 Existing Traffic 5 Existing Operation 5 III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 9 Trip Generation 9 Trip Distribution 9 Background Traffic Projections 11 Trip Assignment/Total Traffic 11 Signal Warrants 11 Geometry 19 Operation Analysis 19 Queuing and Site Circulation 23 Pedestrian/Bicycle Facilities 28 IV. CONCLUSIONS 29 LIST OF TABLES 1. Current Peak Hour Operation 8 2. Trip Generation 9 3. Short Range (2023) Background Peak Hour Operation 22 4. Long Range (2040) Background Peak Hour Operation 24 5. Short Range (2023) Total Peak Hour Operation 25 6. Long Range (2040) Total Peak Hour Operation 27 --ill—Dalai Red Barn Subdivision TIS, March 2018 7 J I -ASSOCIATES LIST OF FIGURES 1. Site Location 3 2. Existing Intersection Geometry 4 3. Recent Peak Hour Traffic 6 4. Averaged Recent Peak Hour Traffic 7 5. Site Plan 10 6. Trip Distribution 12 7. Short Range (2023) Background Peak Hour Traffic 13 8. Long Range (2040) Background Peak Hour Traffic 14 9. Short Range (2023) Site Generated Peak Hour Traffic 15 10. Long Range (2040) Site Generated Peak Hour Traffic 16 11. Short Range (2023) Total Peak Hour Traffic 17 12. Long Range (2040) Total Peak Hour Traffic 18 13. Short Range (2023) Geometry 20 14. Long Range (2040) Geometry 21 APPENDICES A. Base Assumptions Form B. Peak Hour Traffic Counts C. Current Peak Hour Operation/Level of Service Descriptions D. Signal Warrant E. Short Range (2023) Background Peak Hour Operation F. Long Range (2040) Background Peak Hour Operation G. Short Range (2023) Total Peak Hour Operation H. Long Range (2040) Total Peak Hour Operation —/ L—DELICH Red Barn Subdivision TIS, March 2018 —7 11 -ASSOCIATES I. INTRODUCTION This Transportation Impact Study (TIS) addresses the capacity, geometric, and control requirements for the proposed Red Barn Subdivision development. The proposed Red Barn Subdivision site is located in the southwest quadrant of the Colorado (Weld County Road 13)/Weld County Road 32 (WCR32) intersection in Mead, Colorado. During the course of the analysis, numerous contacts were made with the project developer (Rocky Ridge Civil Engineering) and the Town of Mead traffic engineering consultant. This study generally conforms to the format set forth in the Mead TIS Guidelines. Appendix A contains the Traffic Impact Study Base Assumptions form and related attachments for the Red Barn Subdivision. The study involved the following steps: Collect physical, traffic, and development data; - Perform trip generation, trip distribution, and trip assignment; - Determine peak hour traffic volumes; - Conduct capacity and operational level of service analyses on key intersections; - Analyze signal warrants; --1/ LDELICH Red Barn Subdivision TIS, March 2018 —7 I FASSOCIATES Page 1 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS The location of the Red Barn Subdivision site is shown in Figure 1. It is important that a thorough understanding of the existing conditions be presented. Land Use Land uses in the area are primarily residential, agricultural, or open. There are residential uses to the southeast of the site. There are some industrial/commercial uses to the west of the Red Barn Subdivision site (near 1-25). The Red Barn Subdivision site is currently vacant. The center of Mead lies to the west of the proposed Red Barn Subdivision site. Streets The primary streets in the area of the Red Barn Subdivision site are State Highway 66 (SH66), Colorado Boulevard (WCR13), and WCR32. The existing geometry at the SH66/Colorado, Colorado-WCR13/WCR32, and East Frontage Road/ WCR32 intersections is shown in Figure 2. State Highway 66 is an east/west road, categorized as an NR -A highway by CDOT and designated as a Major Arterial on the Town of Mead Roadway Plan. Currently, SH66 has a rural two-lane cross section (no center median lane) with narrow shoulders and a speed limit of 65 mph. At the SH66/Colorado intersection, SH66 has eastbound and westbound left -turn lanes and one through lane in each direction. The SH66/Colorado intersection has signal control. Colorado Boulevard-WCR13 is a north/south road, designated as a Major Arterial on the Town of Mead Roadway Plan. Currently, Colorado Boulevard-WCR13 has a rural two-lane cross section (no center median lane) with a speed limit of 45 mph, increasing to 55 mph 0.5 miles north of SH66. At the SH66/Colorado intersection, Colorado Boulevard has all northbound and southbound movements combined into single lanes. At the Colorado-WCR13/WCR32 intersection, Colorado Boulevard- WCR13 has all northbound and southbound movements combined into single lanes. The Colorado-WCR13/WCR32 intersection has stop sign control on WCR32. Weld County Road 32 is an east/west road, designated as a Minor Arterial on the Town of Mead Roadway Plan. West of Colorado Boulevard-WCR13, WCR32 currently has a paved, rural two-lane cross section (no center median lane) and a speed limit of 45 mph. East of Colorado Boulevard-WCR13, WCR32 currently has a gravel two-lane cross section and no posted speed limit. At the Colorado-WCR13/WCR32 intersection, WCR32 has all eastbound and westbound movements combined into single lanes. At East Frontage Road/WCR32 intersection, WCR32 has all eastbound and westbound movements combined into single lanes. The East Frontage Road/WCR32 intersection has stop sign control on WCR32. --1/1--DELICH Red Barn Subdivision TIS, March 2018 -=ASSOCIATES Page 2 a) a) V M MEAD Welker Ave. WCR 34 cC O N CC O WCR 32 Red Barn Subdivision M_ O MEAD HIGH SCHOOL 66 SCALE: 1"=3000' m 0 c� O` O O SITE LOCATION Figure 1 -�f 1-DELICH -7 j =ASSOCIATES Red Barn Subdivision TIS, March 2018 Page 3 E. Frontage R - Denotes Lane WCR32 SH66 00 E O -a- N O O `o O O EXISTING INTERSECTION GEOMETRY Figure 2 -/n-DELICH -7/ c -ASSOCIATES Red Barn Subdivision TIS, March 2018 Page 4 Existing Traffic Recent peak hour traffic volumes at the SH66/Colorado, Colorado-WCR13/ WCR32, and East Frontage Road/WCR32 intersections are shown in Figure 3. The counts at the key intersections were obtained in January 2018. Raw traffic count data is provided in Appendix B. The traffic was averaged/balanced between the SH66/ Colorado and Colorado-WCR13/WCR32 intersections and is shown in Figure 4. Existing Operation The SH66/Colorado, Colorado-WCR13/WCR32, and East Frontage Road/ WCR32 intersections were evaluated using techniques provided in the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual. Using the morning and afternoon peak hour traffic shown in Figure 4, the peak hour operation is shown in Table 1. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix C. The key intersections are currently operating acceptably with existing control and geometry in the morning and afternoon peak hours. Acceptable operation is defined as level of service (LOS) D or better, overall, during the peak hours. At stop sign controlled intersections, minor street left turns may operate at LOS E/F during the peak hours. This is considered to be normal in urban and urbanizing areas during the peak hours. A description of level of service for signalized and unsignalized intersections from the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual is also provided in Appendix C. It is important to note that based upon the existing traffic volumes, northbound and southbound left -turn and right -turn deceleration lanes are required at the SH66/Colorado intersection. In addition to this, eastbound and westbound right -turn deceleration lanes are required at this intersection. At the Colorado-WCR13/WCR32 intersection, a southbound right -turn deceleration lane is required with the existing afternoon peak hour volume. At the East Frontage Road/WCR32 intersection, northbound and southbound left -turn lanes are required with the existing afternoon peak hour volume. The Town of Mead uses the Colorado State Highway Access Code (SHAC) for auxiliary lane evaluation. --i/ LDELICH Red Barn Subdivision TIS, March 2018 —7 ! j=ASSOCIATES Page 5 N C M M I- N 10/23 f 14/17 2/0 E. Frontage Rd. AM/PM O 0 N \ N WCR32 6/61 2/6 6/7 —\ CO CO CO CO co 0 'a r)- • CO CO CO U 0 r N (\I CO Aa& N L 14/33 — 663/517 67/48 SH66 15/130 349/621 -- 46/91 NItr 0 CO 0 L a) N (`7 0 O O U 0) N - RECENT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 3 -1! LDELICH -71 j -ASSOCIATES Red Barn Subdivision TIS, March 2018 Page 6 N 10/23 14/17 2/0 N- C O E. Frontage Rd. AM/PM N- N Jv 0 O lN 1 t WCR32 6/61 -� 2/6 5/7 o Tr (D (D N- M N- CO N'tr v N O 12/32 f 663/517 67/48 SH66 13/127 349/621 46/91 O U AVERAGED/BALANCED RECENT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 4 -�' 1-DELICH -7 I r= -ASSOCIATES Red Barn Subdivision TIS, March 2018 Page 7 TABLE 1 Current Peak Hour Operation z � SH66/Colorado (signal) EB LT A A EB T/RT A B EB APPROACH A B WB LT A A WB T/RT B B WB APPROACH B B NB LT/T/RT C C SB LT/T/RT C C OVERALL B B Colorado-WCR13/WCR32 (stop sign) EB LT/T/RT B B WB LT/T/RT B NB LT A A A SB LT A A OVERALL A A East Frontage Road/WCR32 (stop sign) EB LT/T/RT A A WB LT/T/RT A A NB LT A A SB LT A A OVERALL A A _-/1 L-DELICH Red Barn Subdivision TIS, March 2018 i / =ASSOCIATES Page 8 III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The Red Barn Subdivision is a residential development, located in the southwest quadrant of the Colorado-WCR13/WCR32 intersection in Mead. Figure 5 shows a site plan of the Red Barn Subdivision. The Red Barn Subdivision will consist of 446 single family dwelling units built in two phases (for traffic analysis purposes). Phase 1 will consist of 165 dwelling units and primary access to/from Colorado Boulevard via Red Barn Road (south access). The six large lots in the southwest quadrant of the Colorado- WCR13/WCR32 intersection will have access to/from WCR32 via a private driveway (future Harvest Moon Road) in Phase 1. When the property to the west of the Red Barn Subdivision develops, there will be a connection via Plum Way. The short range (Year 2023) future includes Phase 1 development of the Red Barn Subdivision and an appropriate increase in background traffic due to normal growth and other potential developments in the area. The long range analysis (Year 2040) includes full development of the Red Barn Subdivision and is in general accordance with the Mead Comprehensive Plan. Trip Generation Trip generation is important in considering the impact of a development such as this upon the existing and proposed street system. A compilation of trip generation information contain in Trip Generation, 10th Edition, ITE was used to estimate the trips that would be generated by the proposed/expected uses at the Red Barn Subdivision site. A trip is defined as a one-way vehicle movement from origin to destination. Table 2 shows the expected trip generation on a daily and peak hour basis for full development of Red Barn Subdivision. The total development trip generation was calculated using the equations from Code 210 - Single Family Detached from the cited reference. Phase 1 development of the Red Barn Subdivision will generate 1,522 daily trip ends, 119 morning peak hour trip ends, and 158 afternoon peak hour trip ends. Full development will generate 4,114 daily trip ends, 321 morning peak hour trip ends, and 427 afternoon peak hour trip ends. TABLE 2 Trip Generation Phase 1 210 Single Family Detached 152 D.U. EQ 1402 EQ 27 EQ 82 EQ 92 EQ 54 210 Estate Lots 13 D.U. EQ 120 EQ 3 EQ 7 EQ 8 EQ 4 Subtotal 165 D.U. 1522 30 89 100 58 Phase 2 210 Single Family Detached 281 D.U. EQ 2592 EQ 50 EQ 152 EQ 169 EQ 100 Total 446 D.U. 4114 80 241 269 158 1--DELICH / =ASSOCIATES Red Barn Subdivision TIS, March 2018 Page 9 Ae- N SCALE: 1"=400' CR 32 (100' ROW) SITE PLAN - PHASE 1 Figure 5 --/ILDELICH -7 / 1 -ASSOCIATES Red Barn Subdivision TIS, March 2018 Page 10 (AG8 ,oz£4 bo Trip Distribution Trip distribution for the Red Barn Subdivision was based on existing/future travel patterns, land uses in the area, consideration of trip attractions/productions in the area, and engineering judgment. Figure 6 shows the trip distribution for the short range (2023) and long range (2040) analysis futures. The trip distribution of the individual movements at the various intersections is displayed in the trip assignment figures. Background Traffic Projections Figures 7 and 8 respectively show the short range (2023) and long range (2040) background traffic projections. Background traffic projections for the short range (2023) and long range (2040) future horizons were obtained by reviewing the Mead Comprehensive Plan, CDOT 20 -year factors, the North Front Range Regional Transportation Plan, and various traffic studies prepared for this area of Mead. The CDOT 20 -year factor for SH66, west of Colorado Boulevard, is 1.56. East of Colorado Boulevard, the CDOT 20 -year factor is 1.58. Traffic volumes on Colorado Boulevard- WCR13, WCR32, and the East Frontage Road were increased by approximately two percent per year. In the long range (2040) future, development of vacant land adjacent to WCR32 was assumed. Trip Assignment/Total Traffic Trip assignment is how the generated and distributed trips are expected to be loaded on the street system. The assigned trips are the resultant of the trip distribution process. Figures 9 and 10 respectively show the Phase 1 (2023) and Full Development peak hour trip assignment of the site generated traffic. Figures 9 and 10 also show the trip distribution for the individual movements at the various study intersections. Figures 11 and 12 respectively show the short range (2023) and long range (2040) total (site plus background) peak hour traffic at the SH66/Colorado, Colorado/Red Barn, Colorado/ Harvest Moon, Colorado-WCR13/WCR32, WCR32/Harvest Moon, and East Frontage Road/WCR32 intersections. Signal Warrants As a matter of policy, traffic signals are not installed at any location unless warrants are met according to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. The SH66/Colorado intersection is currently signalized. For the roads in the vicinity of the Red Barn Subdivision, four hour and/or eight hour signal warrants are applicable. These warrants require much data and are applied when the traffic is actually on the area road system. It is acknowledged that peak hour signal warrants should not be applied, but since the peak hour forecasts are readily available in a traffic impact study, it is reasonable to use them to estimate whether other signal warrants may be met. If peak hour signal warrants will not //il—DELICH Red Barn Subdivision TIS, March 2018 / =ASSOCIATES Page 11 SCALE: 1"=2000' TRIP DISTRIBUTION Figure 6 -JIL-DELICH -7/ 1 ASSOCIATES Red Barn Subdivision TIS, March 2018 Page 12 N 0 co V co In (`7 CO N 11/25 16/19 2/0 N'Itr m .�- M rn m or) co c O L U- AM/PM WCR32 w o N 6/68 2/6 —► 6/8 —\ 13/37 �— 760/592 77/55 SH66 15/145 398/708 52/103 sir 41 N O LX) N N- N COCO O fo O O U SHORT RANGE (2023) BACKGROUND PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 7 _J1 L--DELICH -71 [-ASSOCIATES Red Barn Subdivision TIS, March 2018 Page 13 LU (n f I 0 LU 50/60 35/35 70/50 10/5 35/20 — 15/15 0 0 0 N- co (n o 0 E. Frontage Rd. cn AM/PM Rounded to Nearest 5 Vehicles LU 0 LU 0 o co 10 O N (n M U N 5/5 �— 5/5 5/5 WCR32 LONG RANGE (2040) BACKGROUND PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 75/140 5/5 120/90 (n 0 , o CO 0 40/120 f 1105/860 110/80 SH66 25/225 575/1020 75/150 C 0 0 co N in () O O d O N O O O U Figure 8 J/ L-DELICH - =ASSOCIATES Red Barn Subdivision TIS, March 2018 Page 14 0 0 M 9/5 (10%) f 2/1 (2.5%) 0/2 (2.5%) a) O) CO C O LL W 0 o rn a) 10/6(11.5%) — 1/2 (2.5%) WCR32 3/11 (11.5%)i 0/1 (1%)—\ AM/PM (trip distribution) M O N 1/1 (1%)-' 4/12 (13%) - U) O N T N W "1> 0 O v Red Barn 27/17 (29.5%) 59/39 (67%) —\ a M O r O N- \— 7/20 (20%) SH66 10/33 (32.5%) U) 0 m O O O PHASE 1 (2023) SITE GENERATED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 9 --� L-DELICH -ASSOCIATES Red Barn Subdivision TIS, March 2018 Page 15 24/16 (10%) 6/4 (2.5%) 1/6 (2.5%) E. Frontage R WCR32 1/4 (1.5%).- 10/36 (13.5%) O O AM/PM (trip distribution) a) CO `1- ---- co 0 45 2/2 (1.5%) 9/28 (10%) #J / 13/9 (6%) ' 12/11 (5.5%) LI o co CO N V M N M 20/13 (8.5%) M U Aik N 52/34 (21.5%) Lr? LU Red Barn 17/12 (7%) 95/62 (39.5%) 20/24 (11%) 17/54 (20%) SH66 24/81 (30%) Colorado 12/40 (15 FULL DEVELOPMENT SITE GENERATED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 10 --4/ LDELICH -7/ 1 -ASSOCIATES Red Barn Subdivision TIS, March 2018 Page 16 -6- N -JM f O COCO ft CO 20/30 - 18/20 2/0 N CO E. Frontage Rd. O CT AM/PM WCR32 R32 SHORT RANGE (2023) TOTAL PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 17/93 — 0/1 M rn 62/24 Iv ) 1/2 imummemiNir NIr 7/69 1 o N 2/6 I N 10/20 N a) N 0 CD N O Co °, Red Barn 27/17 59/39 N- co JO i m N V0J co N— M 1 t N CO a a- CO N CD CD N N CO N N- 20/57 f 760/592 f- 77/55 SH 66 25/178 398/708 52/103 -\ O N- N - LO OD N 0 C6 O O U M Figure 11 LDELICH -7 / 1 -ASSOCIATES Red Barn Subdivision TIS, March 2018 Page 17 U, V m (f) N (r) ill 75/75 40/40 70/50 10/5 35/25 i 15/15 —\ NItr o o coo to 0 o co 4) O) co C 2 U- ui AM/PM Rounded to Nearest 5 Vehicles (r) O O O (N 140/225 O) N 10/30 WCR32 200/240 -i 10/35 C O O O N (r) if LU co O Aik N 5/5 f 5/5 5/5 90/150 5/5 —� 130/100 co N L O ("N co 2 Harvest Moon 20/15 55/35 O O §2-c9 O N 1 Red Barn 15/10 95/60 O U) L- (O (f) O) 0 l() Li) rn LC) N LO O 0 M 230/565 (n (D M N 60/180 �- 1105/860 110/80 SH 66 50/300 575/1020 75/150 O O O CO m N M O U) O N O (0 O O U LONG RANGE (2040) TOTAL PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 12 -�l �.-DELICH -7 j =ASSOCIATES Red Barn Subdivision TIS, March 2018 Page 18 be met at a given intersection, it is reasonable to conclude that it is not likely that other signal warrants would be met. If peak hour signal warrants are met, it merely indicates that further evaluation should occur in the future as the development occurs. However, a judgment can be made that some intersections will likely meet other signal warrants. Signal warrants were evaluated at the Colorado-WCR13/WCR32 intersection. Using the long range (2040) background traffic forecasts (Figure 8), peak hour signal warrants will be met in the afternoon peak hour. Using the long range (2040) total traffic forecasts (Figure 12), peak hour signal warrants will be met in both the morning and afternoon peak hours. Peak hour signal warrants are provided in Appendix D. It is not likely that the four-hour or eight -hour signal warrants will be met at this intersection. Geometry Figures 13 and 14 respectively show a schematic of the short range (2023) and long range (2040) intersection geometry. As was mentioned with the existing traffic volumes, northbound and southbound left -turn and right -turn deceleration lanes are required at the SH66/Colorado intersection. In addition to this, eastbound and westbound right -turn deceleration lanes are required at this intersection. At the Colorado- WCR13/WCR32 intersection, a southbound right -turn deceleration lane is required with the existing afternoon peak hour volume. At the East Frontage Road/WCR32 intersection, northbound and southbound left -turn lanes are required with the existing afternoon peak hour volume. Based upon the short range (2023) traffic with Phase 1 of the Red Barn Subdivision, a northbound left -turn deceleration lane is required at the Colorado-WCR13/ WCR32 intersection. A northbound left -turn deceleration lane is also required at the Colorado/Red Barn intersection. All other required lanes were warranted with the existing traffic volumes. Operation Analysis Operational analyses were performed at the SH66/Colorado, Colorado/Red Barn, Colorado/Harvest Moon, Colorado-WCR13/WCR32, WCR32/Harvest Moon, and East Frontage Road/WCR32 intersections. The operations analyses were conducted for the short range future, reflecting a year 2023 condition, and long range future, reflecting a year 2040 condition. Table 3 shows the short range (2023) background peak hour operation at the SH66/Colorado, Colorado-WCR13/WCR32, and East Frontage Road/WCR32 intersections. The key intersections operate at acceptable levels of service in both peak hours with existing control and geometry. Therefore, the key intersections will also operate acceptably with the required auxiliary lanes. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix E. ��—DELICH Red Barn Subdivision TIS, March 2018 i i -=ASSOCIATES Page 19 1 +� Warranted with Existing volumes E. Frontage R - Existing Lane - Required Lane WCR32 R32 co co Warranted with Existing volumes SHORT RANGE (2023) GEOMETRY Red Barn SH66 M U N La 7 ADA _ 411- N Figure 13 O DELICH l I -ASSOCIATES Red Barn Subdivision TIS, March 2018 Page 20 (-° E. Frontage Rd. N _ - Existing Lane - Required Lane WCR32 LONG RANGE (2040) GEOMETRY O O Aik N Figure 14 --di --DELICH f 1- ASSOCIATES Red Barn Subdivision TIS, March 2018 Page 21 TABLE 3 Short Range (2023) Background Peak Hour Operation Movement p ` i° ,, , H SH66/Colorado (signal) (existing geometry) EB LT A A EB T/RT B C EB APPROACH B C WB LT A B WB T/RT B B WB APPROACH B B NB LT/T/RT C C SB LT/T/RT C C OVERALL B C Colorado-WCR13/WCR32 (stop sign) EB LT/T/RT B B WB LT/T/RT B B NB LT A A SB LT A A OVERALL A A East Frontage Road/WCR32 (stop sign) EB LT/T/RT B A WB LT/T/RT A B NB LT A A SB LT A A OVERALL A A ��-DELICH Red Barn Subdivision TIS, March 2018 5 , =ASSOCIATES Page 22 Using the long range (2040) background traffic (Figure 8), the SH66/Colorado, Colorado-WCR13/WCR32, and East Frontage Road/ WCR32 intersections operate as indicated in Table 4. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix F. The key intersections will operate acceptably with recommended control and geometry. Table 5 shows the short range (2023) total peak hour operation at the SH66/ Colorado, Colorado/Red Barn, Colorado-WCR13/WCR32, WCR32/Driveway, and East Frontage Road/WCR32 intersections. The key intersections operate at acceptable levels of service in both peak hours with the existing geometry and the required geometry. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix G. Using the long range (2040) total traffic volumes shown in Figure 12 and recommended control and geometrics, the SH66/Colorado, Colorado/Red Barn, Colorado/Harvest Moon, Colorado-WCR13/WCR32, WCR32/Harvest Moon, and East Frontage Road/WCR32 intersections will operate as indicated in Table 6. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix H. All key intersections will operate acceptably with recommended control and geometrics. Queuing and Site Circulation For analysis purposes, Colorado Boulevard/WCR13 is assumed to be categorized as an NR -B roadway according to the State Highway Access Code (SHAC). Using the long range (2040) traffic forecasts and the SHAC, the north leg of the SH66/Colorado intersection will require a southbound left -turn lane of approximately 435 feet (taper @ 13.5:1) at 45 mph. This intersection will also require a southbound right -turn lane of approximately 435 feet (taper @ 13.5:1). The calculated queue length of the southbound left -turn lane is approximately 150 feet. However, the SYNCHRO analysis shows that in the morning peak hour, the "95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles." If no geometric improvements are made to the north leg in the short range (2023 future, the southbound calculated queue length is approximately 382 feet with "95t percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles." The required northbound left -turn lanes at the Colorado/Red Barn and Colorado/Harvest Moon intersections should be approximately 435 feet long (taper @ 13.5:1) at 45 mph. The long range (2040) calculated queue length of the northbound left -turn lane approaching Red Barn and Harvest Moon is less than one vehicle. The calculated queue length for the left -turn lanes on Red Barn Road and Harvest Moon Road is less than one vehicle. The required northbound left -turn lane at the Colorado-WCR13/WCR32 intersection should be approximately 435 feet long (taper @ 13.5:1) at 45 mph. The long range (2040) calculated queue length of the northbound left -turn lane approaching WCR32 is less than one vehicle. The calculated queue length for the eastbound left - turn lane on WCR32 is six vehicles (approximately 140 feet). --1/f—DELICH Red Barn Subdivision TIS, March 2018 —7 I =ASSOCIATES Page 23 TABLE 4 Long Range (2040) Background Peak Hour Operation SH66/Colorado (signal) EB LT B B EB T B B EBRT A B EB APPROACH B B WB LT A B WBT B B WB RT A A WB APPROACH B B NB LT B B NB T C C NB RT C A NB APPROACH C C SB LT C B SB T C C SB RT A A SB APPROACH C C OVERALL B B Colorado-WCR13/WCR32 (stop sign) EB LT C E EB T/RT B B EB APPROACH B D WB LT/T/RT B C NB LT A A SB LT A A OVERALL A A East Frontage Road/WCR32 (stop sign) EB LT/T/RT B B WB LT/T/RT B B NB LT A A SB LT A A OVERALL A A -111-DELICH I -ASSOCIATES Red Barn Subdivision TIS, March 2018 Page 24 TABLE 5 Short Range (2023) Total Peak Hour Operation Int onilt vein,"r L t r� SH66/Colorado (signal) (existing geometry) EB LT B B EB T/RT B B EB APPROACH B B WB LT A B WB T/RT B B WB APPROACH B B NB LT/T/RT C D SB LT/T/RT D C OVERALL C C SH66/Colorado (signal) (with NB & SB LT lanes) EB LT B B EB T/RT B C EB APPROACH B C WB LT A B WB T/RT C B WB APPROACH B B EB LT C C EB T/RT C C EB APPROACH C C WB LT C C WB T/RT C C WB APPROACH C C OVERALL B C SH66/Colorado (signal) (full required geometry) EB LT A A EB T A B EBRT A A EB APPROACH A B WB LT A A WBT B B WB RT A A WB APPROACH B B NB LT C C NB T C C NB RT C < O O O< O m NB APPROACH C SB LT C SB T C SB RT A SB APPROACH C OVERALL B Continued on next page //LDELICH —7 / I —ASSOCIATES Red Barn Subdivision TIS, March 2018 Page 25 Continued from previous page TABLE 5 Short Range (2023) Total Peak Hour Operation ■ �� tntei c n <' s Movement • ¢ ar s3 Colorado/Red Barn (stop sign) EB LT/RT B B NB LT A A OVERALL A A Colorado-WCR13/WCR32 (stop sign) (NB LT lane) EB LT/T/RT B B WB LT/T/RT B B NB LT A A SB LT A A OVERALL A A Colorado-WCR13/WCR32 (stop sign) (NB LT lane & SB RT lane) EB LT/T/RT B B WB LT/T/RT B B NB LT A A SB LT A A OVERALL A A WCR32/Driveway (stop sign) NB LT/RT A A WB LT A A OVERALL A A East Frontage Road/WCR32 (stop sign) (existing geometry) EB LT/T/RT B B WB LT/T/RT A B NB LT A A SB LT A A OVERALL A A East Frontage Road/WCR32 (stop sign) (NB & SB LT lanes) EB LT/T/RT B B WB LT/T/RT A B NB LT A A SB LT A A OVERALL A A J/L DELICH =ASSOCIATES Red Barn Subdivision TIS, March 2018 Page 26 TABLE 6 Long Range (2040) Total Peak Hour Operation Inter ti n Movemelr t :` y s� rz n j . SH66/Colorado (signal) EB LT B C EB T B C EBRT A B EB APPROACH B C WB LT A B WBT B C WB RT A B WB APPROACH B C NB LT B B NB T C C NB RT C A NB APPROACH C C SB LT C B SB T C C SB RT A A SB APPROACH C C OVERALL B C Colorado/Red Barn (stop sign) EB LT/RT B B NB LT A A OVERALL A A Colorado/Harvest Moon (stop sign) EB LT/RT B B NB LT A A OVERALL A A Colorado-WCR13/WCR32 (stop sign) EB LT C F EB T/RT B B EB APPROACH B E WB LT/T/RT B C NB LT A A SB LT A A OVERALL A B WCR32/Harvest Moon (stop sign) NB LT/RT B B WB LT A A OVERALL A A East Frontage Road/WCR32 (stop sign) EB LT/T/RT B B WB LT/T/RT B C NB LT A A SB LT A A OVERALL A A -CAI-DELICH -7/ I -ASSOCIATES Red Barn Subdivision TIS, March 2018 Page 27 The required westbound left -turn lane at the WCR32/Harvest Moon intersection should be approximately 435 feet long (taper @ 13.5:1) at 45 mph. The calculated queue length of the northbound left -turn lane on Harvest Moon Road approaching WCR32 is less than one vehicle. The required northbound and southbound left -turn lanes at the East Frontage Road/WCR32 intersection should be approximately 435 feet long (taper @ 13.5:1) at 45 mph. The long range (2040) calculated queue length of the northbound and southbound left -turn lanes approaching WCR32 is less than one vehicle. The calculated queue length for the east leg on WCR32 approaching the East Frontage Road is two vehicles (approximately 50 feet). Red Barn Road and Harvest Moon Road are the minor collector streets through the Red Barn Subdivision. There will be a connection to the property to the west (Plum Way) with full development of the site. Pedestrian/Bicycle Facilities It is assumed that there will be pedestrian facilities (sidewalks/paths) along all streets within the Red Barn Subdivision. These facilities will provide safe pedestrian areas within the Red Barn Subdivision. Currently, there is a lack of sidewalks in the area. There are no sidewalks along any of the roads in the vicinity of the Red Barn Subdivision. As Mead becomes more urban in the future, it is expected that there will be sidewalks along the existing and future streets. Most of the streets within the Red Barn Subdivision development are considered to be local streets. Therefore, defined bike lanes are not required. There are narrow shoulders along SH66, Colorado Boulevard-WCR13, and WCR32. As exterior streets are improved, bike lanes should be incorporated into the cross sections per Mead Street Standards. �j=—DELICH Red Barn Subdivision TIS, March 2018 —7 / I -ASSOCIATES Page 28 IV. CONCLUSIONS This study assessed the impacts of the Red Barn Subdivision development on the street system in the short range (2023) and long range (2040) futures. As a result of this analysis, the following is concluded: The Red Barn Subdivision development is feasible from a traffic engineering standpoint. Phase 1 development of the Red Barn Subdivision will generate 1,522 daily trip ends, 119 morning peak hour trip ends, and 158 afternoon peak hour trip ends. Full development will generate 4,114 daily trip ends, 321 morning peak hour trip ends, and 427 afternoon peak hour trip ends. Currently, the SH66/Colorado, Colorado-WCR13/WCR32, and East Frontage Road/WCR32 intersections operate acceptably with existing control and geometry. It is important to note that based upon the existing traffic volumes, northbound and southbound left -turn and right -turn deceleration lanes are required at the SH66/ Colorado intersection. In addition to this, eastbound and westbound right -turn deceleration lanes are required at this intersection. At the Colorado-WCR13/ WCR32 intersection, a southbound right -turn deceleration lane is required with the existing afternoon peak hour volume. At the East Frontage Road/WCR32 intersection, northbound and southbound left -turn lanes are required with the existing afternoon peak hour volume. The Town of Mead uses the Colorado State Highway Access Code (SHAC) for auxiliary lane evaluation. - Using the long range (2040) background traffic forecasts, peak hour signal warrants will be met in the afternoon peak hour. Using the long range (2040) total traffic forecasts, peak hour signal warrants will be met in both the morning and afternoon peak hours. It is not likely that the four-hour or eight -hour signal warrants will be met at this intersection. - In the short range (2023) future, given development of the Red Barn Subdivision and an increase in background traffic, the key intersections will operate acceptably with the existing geometry and the required geometry. In the long range (2040) future, given full development of the Red Barn Subdivision and an increase in background traffic, the key intersections will operate acceptably with the recommended geometry and control. - The short range (2023) and long range (2040) geometry is shown in Figures 13 and 14, respectively. Based upon the short range (2023) traffic with Phase 1 of the Red Barn Subdivision, a northbound left -turn deceleration lane is required at the Colorado-WCR13/WCR32 intersection. A northbound left -turn deceleration lane is also required at the Colorado/Red Barn intersection. All other required lanes were warranted with the existing traffic volumes. iiL—DELICH Red Barn Subdivision TIS, March 2018 i =ASSOCIATES Page 29 APPENDIX A RE: Red Barn Subdivision TIS Scoping Packet Subject: RE: Red Barn Subdivision TIS Scoping Packet From: Kari McDowell Schroeder <kari@mcdowelleng.com> Date: 2/12/2018 10:06 AM To: "Michael P. Delich" <michael@delichassoc.com> Michael, This looks good. I had a few comments. 1. Be sure to include any other phased analysis if the developer wants to construct phased/incremental infrastructure improvements. 2. Determine the percent of traffic impact on the north leg of WCR 13 at SH 66 to determine if a revised State Highway Access Permit is required. 3. Include a figure with the directional distribution by movement. 4. Review the anticipated queues and impacts to site circulation. Specifically — Red Barn Way & CR 13, Barnyard Way & CR 13, Barnyard Way & CR 32 5. Provide for future connectivity for the parcel to the west. Tract B? Thanks, Kari From: Michael P. Delich [mailto:michael@delichassoc_comj Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2018 8:55 AM To: Kari McDowell Schroeder <kariPrcdowelleng.can > Subject: Red Barn Subdivision TIS Scoping Packet Kari- Attached is the scoping packet for the Red Barn Subdivision Traffic Impact Study. The development will total 446 single family dwelling units. I used the equations from Trip Generation,10th Edition, ITE. The plan is to initially build 159 D.U. that will have access to/from WCR13 (Colorado Blvd.) via Red Barn Way (south access). There are six large lots in the SW quadrant of the Colorado/WCR32 intersection that will initially have a driveway to access WCR32. This driveway will eventually become Barnyard Way with subsequent phases of development. The year of full build -out of the Red Barn Subdivision is unknown and subject to market conditions. Therefore, we are including full build -out in the long range (2040) future. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments. Thank you. Michael Delich ,:hael Delich DelLeh ch Associate 22 ) Glen. Haven Drive Loveland, 00 8')53Y C t i ce: u _669-206: 1 of 2 2/20/2018 12:41 PM McDowell Engineering Traffic Study Scoping Form C DOWELL ENGINEERINGILc T*A1lSPU*tATla+• aNS+Mtsl1Ns CONSLLt►Mts Contact Information Consultant Name: Delich Associates Tele: 970-669-2061 E-mail: michael@delichassoc.com Developer/Owner Name: Rocky Ridge Civil Engineering Project Information (Attach proposed site plan. ) Project Name: Red Barn Subdivision Project Location: SW Quadrant Colorado (WCR13)/WCR32 Project Description: Application type (rezoning, subdivision) acreage, new or re -development, etc. Zoned (Colorado intersection R4 — Blvd.) 198 will acres. via Red have access Phase 1 will Barn Way. via a consist of Six D.U. in driveway (future 165 the D.U. and SW quadrant Barnyard have access of Way) the to/from Colorado/WCR32 WCR13 Existing/ Proposed Land Uses ITE Code #units or Size Existing/ Proposed Land Uses ITE Code #units or Size Existing/ Proposed Land Uses ITE Code #units or Size Single Family 210 446 D.U. Please attach Trip Generation Summary table for large or mixed use projects. Assumptions Study Horizons Current Year: 2018 Buildout Year: 2023 (Phase 1) Long Term Year: 2040 Study Area Boundaries (Attach map if needed.) North: WCR32 South: SH66 East: Colorado Boulevard (WCR13) West: East Frontage Road Intersections Evaluated (Attach needed.) to be map if 1. All site entrances 6. 2. Colorado/WCR32 7. 3. WCR32/E. Frontage Rd. 8. 4. SH66/Colorado 9. 5. 10. Trip Distribution See attached sketch. Trip Reductions* Internal Capture Use: % Use: % Pass By Use: Use: 0/ *Include in Trip Generation table if provided. Submit calculations based upon lTE's Trip Generation Handbook. Page 1 of 2 McDowell Engineering Tr Assumptions (continued) Anticipated Traffic Growth (Describe methodology.) Future Rates CDOT WCR13) WCR13) u 2%/year 20 -year = 1.58 = 1.56 on all factor / other SH66 on SH66 (west roads (east of of Study Time Periods (Check all that apply-) (7 Pi AM (7-9) PM (4-b) ❑ SAT (noon) Other: Other Factors (Proposed/assumed transportation improvements, other studies, nearby proposed developments, etc.) Analysis Issues (Check Methods all that apply.) & or Rodel Warrants &Storage (Access Bicycle, Distance Permit, etc.) Pedestrian & Transit Accomodations Impacts 171 Synchro HCS aaSidra Intersections RoadwaySections Signal Safety/Sight Queuing CDOT Identify TDM Vi 2' 7 .zi ,❑ [] Neighborhood Other: Attachments, Notes, & Other Assumptions: Signed: (Applicant or Consultan ) Print Name: Michael Delich (Delich Associates) (Applicant or Consultant) Date: February 6, 2018 Review Agency: Department: Signed: Print Name: Date: Page 2 of 2 111100 N SMOC]VB W ovals] IMMO 5I titter ;s'a o -e 32r•n UI - .3 01 ��a0 LI1 ROK k.F5w�Si 4 .o( ik • 6000 • • eo as ), • 60.01. .ua...M�ra . io.a ►.ate. �« ,_•,ffO00 aMM ..r...-i- a• : •• SITE PLAN CR 32 (100' ROW) SCALE: 1"=400' - PHASE 1 S. y * a9 . & 6 • i+ PHASE A ". � A 1 s ..... 4 x 1. rm... F7 JJT 'ja : -. . • • -a • • i •,• • . e. • t * _...LT1 I MCI1 SW 11' 14.30'W Figure 5 -//L-DELICH -7/ � -ASSOCIATES Red Barn Subdivision TIS. February 2018 Page 10 I JN18V38 JO SISVS --/ C, SMOC]V8W OVEIS]WOH SCALE: 1"=3000' SITE LOCATION Figure 1 ../1 L-DELICH -7/ ,-ASSOCIATES Red Barn Subdivision TIS, February 2018 Page 3 TABLE 2 Trip Generation Phase 1 210 Single Family Detached 152 D.U. EQ 1402 EQ 27 EQ 82 EQ 92 EQ 54 210 Estate Lots 13 D.U. EQ 120 EQ 3 EQ 7 EQ 8 EQ 4 Subtotal 165 D.U. 1522 30 89 100 58 Phase 2 210 Single Family Detached 281 D.U. EQ 2592 EQ 50 EQ 152 EQ 169 EQ 100 Total 446 D.U. 4114 80 241 269 158 SCALE: 1".2000' TRIP DISTRIBUTION Figure 6 -1/ Z-DELICH -71 ,-ASSOCIATES Red Barn Subdivision TIS, February 2018 Page 3 APPENDIX B DELICH ASSOCIATES 2272 GLEN HAVEN DRIVE LOVELAND, CO 80538 Phone: 1970) 669-2061 TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS Date: 1/31/2018 Observer: Vickie Day: Wednesday Jurisdiction: Mead/Weld County R = right turn S = straight L = left turn Intersection: SH66/Colorado Time Begins Northbound: Colorado Southbound: Colorado Total north/south Eastbound: SH66 Westbound: SH66 Total east/west Total All L S R Total L S R Total L S R Total L S R Total 7:00 6 18 28 52 12 14 5 "J1- 83 3 84 11 _., -: 15 157 3 1 5 273 7:15 7 20 38 55 15 17 4 36. 101 2 112 16 1ge,,, 18 167 6 181 321 7:30 7 25 25 57 23 21 11 u.„„85:. 112 5 85 7 X07 16 172 3 191 ,. 288 7:45 6 30 28 19 8 8 99 5 68 12 18 167 2 .:187 �: 272 8:00 9 12 19 13 10 9 1/4 72 7 67 15 , 4 21 122 7 , 150 239 8:15 1 15 13 29 10 9 12 ;� 60 5 84 14 - 17 86 1 104 207 8:30 4 16 9 29 11 14 7 : 2 61 6 63 5 4 8 89 5 176 8:45 2 17 11 30 9 10 6 55 4 61 8 ' 10 79 3 12 °. 165 .. 7:00-8:00 28 93 t 238 X0.75 . $0 157 395 1.75 8 _ _ a 410 6 > 663 . ' 4 = 744 1154 PHF 0.93 0.78 0.78 0.92 0.71 0.64 0.71 0.88 0 0.78 j 0.72 0.79 J 0.93 0.96 0.58 0.97 0.9 0.92 4:00 15 24 12 51 71 3 14 8 4:15 4:30 20 9 35 26 16 12 47 2 3 13 18 11 10 4:45 5:00 12 18 26 37 13 17 51'. 72 4 4 21 16 4 9 5:15 11 29 17 3 13 10 76 97 78 80 25 133 23 8 93 3 24 31 139 155 29 33 r 6 12 101 124 2 4 285 101 83 30 39 128 187 21 20 14 12 138 132 10 11 30 151 17 10 123 8 5:30 14 32 18 2 16 10 92 34 135 16 19 127 13 301 359 341 401 339 344 5:45 11 27 15 3 14 11 81 28 127 16 12 119 9 311 4:30.5:30 50 118 X S9 227 14 0e 33 115 342 X 130. W1 !1 : 842 48. .517 33 598 1440 .. ; PHF 0.69 0.8 0.87 0.79 0.88 0.81 0.83 0.93 0.85 0.83 0.830.69+ 0.86 0.86 0.94 0.75 0.92 0.9 0.89 DELICH ASSOCIATES 2272 GLEN HAVEN DRIVE LOVELAND, CO 80538 Phone: (9701669-2061 TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS R = right turn S = straight L = left turn Date: 1/31/2018 Day: Wednesday Observer: Mary Jurisdiction: Mead/Weld County Intersection: WCR13/WCR32 Time Begins Northbound: WCR13 Southbound: WCR13 Total north/south Eastbound: WCR32 Westbound: WCR32 Total eastlwest Total All L S R Total L S R Total L S R Total L S R Total 7:00 0 18 0 1!. 0 48 7 _ 73 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 . , -:;, 2 7:15 1 24 0 25 1 59 12 97 0 0 0 — .' 0 0 0 , rt , 0 7:30 0 29 0 ' ? 0 50 10; ;:� 89 2 0 2`- 1 0 1 0 A a 1 (" 5_s .I' 7:45 2 11 1 ^ q" 1 54 13 82 3 2 3 4 . 1 0 0 A; 9 f s 8:00 2 17 1 20 0 30 3 33 53 2 0 1, 0 2 0 :.;; 5 t 8:15 1 14 0 13 1 20 2 23 „ ;; 38 0 0 1 t x; 0 0 0 ; :,,.. 1 , `. 8:30 2 21 0 23 2 30 4 3$ 59 1 2 2 ,S :; 0 0 0 0 „_ 5 :' ,. ;; 8:45 1 17 1 19. ;. 1 24 2 17 46 1 0 1 r 1 1 0 2 4 7:00-8:00 882t. 86 2 ' ' 211 255 341 e _' 14 1 ;�� , ; 2 16 PHF 0.38 0.71 0.25 0.74 0.5 0.89 0.81 0.89 0.88 0.5 0.25 0.5 0.44 0.25 0.25 n/a 0.5 0.44 0.92 4:00 1 45 1 1 26 1 75 10 0 1 1 1 0 13 4:15 2 50 3 0 21 0 76 14 0 1 4:30 4:45 0 0 51 57 0 1 0 0 32 23 3 1 1r 86 82 12 18 1 0 1 2 5:00 5:15 3 1 77 55 0 0 1 0 28 23 2 1 111 80 12 19 3 2 0 4 5:30 1 54 0 0 26 1 82 11 0 4 5:45 2 48 1 1 24 2 78 13 1 2 I 0 1 0 16 0 1 3 2 0 0 17 23 1 1 0 0 1 0 17 26 0 1 0 16 1 2 1 20 4. 4:30-5:30 4 -240 1 245 i:.T 10 7. 114 359 1 asr1<;, 74 9 83 PHF 0.33 0.78 0.25 0.77 0.25 0.83 0.58 0.81 0.81 0.8 0.5 0.44 0.74 0.75 0.42 0.25 0.75 0.8 0.86 DELICH ASSOCIATES 2272 GLEN HAVEN DRIVE LOVELAND, CO 80538 Phone: (9701 669-2061 TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS Date: 1/31/2018 Observer: Karen Day: Wednesday Jurisdiction: Mead/Weld County R = right turn S = straight L = left turn Intersection: East Frontage Road/WCR32 Time Begins Northbound: E. Frontage Southbound: E. Frontage Total northlsouth Eastbound: WCR32 Westbound: WCR32 Total east/west Total All L S R Total L S R Total L S R Total L S R Total — 7:00 0 1 0 1 2 9 0 11 12 1 2 2 y5 0 0 1 1 6 7:15 0 0 0 0 ` 1 3 ` 2 0- 6 3 1 2 4 1 2 3 0 12 7:30 0 1 0 ° 7 17 0 25 1 6 1 k= 0 5 1 " .,e ::` 14 s .... r 7:45 0 5 0 6 34 1 41� 46 3 5 5 x 1 5 3 22 8:00 1 3 1 ' 2 11 1 14 19 1 4 2 ..,� 1 1 0 � 2 � 9 8:15 2 8 0 10 . 8 13 1 , .. 32 1 2 2 , v. _ 0 3 6 ., r ^'� 14 ^ , 8:30 0 5 0 5 3 11 1 , 15�r_ 20 2 0 3 ,. 0 0 4, <_ 9 8:45 0 2 0 4 12 1 17 19 1 1 2 ,._ 1 1 1 3„ 7 7:30-8:30 3 17 - 1 :; 21 23 V' : j 3 101 122 - t1r ' 33 `w .14 �y 26 59 'r PHF 0.38 0.53 0.25 0.53 0.72 0.55 0.75 0.62 _ 0.66 0.5 0.71 0.5 0.63 0.5 0.7 0.42 0.72 0.67 0.67 4:00 4 15 0 2 7 1 4:15 3 14 1 3 10 1 le 29 4:30 6 16 0 2 8 1 4:45 4 25 1 5 11 2 32 33 48 1 1 0 2 2 0 2 1 1 0 2 2 5:00 5:15 8 6 39 27 0 0 5:30 1 18 0 5:45 3 15 1 2 3 5 3 1 0 1 4 1 3 2 55 39 25 26 0 1 0 2 2 2 0 1 4 2 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 2 5 6 4 2 3 4 12 4 5 9 5 4 4 9 20 10 14 21 14 7 12 rr 4:30-5:30 24 4 107 1 132 F12 2T _ , 43 175 f . 1 ; 8' ;: 19 '1i "" 40 59 PHF 0.75 0.69 0.25 0.7 0.6 0.61 0.5 0.6 0.8 0.38 0.88 T 0.56 I 0.79 niai 0.71 0.64 0.67 0.7 0.77 APPENDIX C HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Recent AM 9: SH66 & Colorado c k t Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1+ ) 4 4+ Traffic Volume (veh/h) 13 349 46 67 663 12 26 79 119 87 76 36 Future Volume (veh/h) 13 349 46 67 663 12 26 79 119 87 76 36 Number 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 18 7 4 14 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1900 1863 1900 1900 1863 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 14 379 42 73 721 12 28 86 57 95 83 25 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 374 877 97 605 1026 17 103 168 99 205 126 34 Arrive On Green 0.03 0.53 0.51 0.06 0.56 0.54 0.15 0.17 0.15 0.15 0.17 0.15 Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 1648 183 1774 1827 30 184 995 590 680 750 201 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 14 0 421 73 0 733 171 0 0 203 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 0 1831 1774 0 1857 1769 0 0 1630 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.2 0.0 8.2 1.0 0.0 16.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.2 0.0 8.2 1.0 0.0 16.7 5.2 0.0 0.0 6.8 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.10 1.00 0.02 0.16 0.33 0.47 0.12 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 374 0 974 605 0 1043 340 0 0 338 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.04 0.00 0.43 0.12 0.00 0.70 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.60 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 475 0 974 653 0 1043 345 0 0 342 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(l) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 7.6 0.0 8.3 5.5 0.0 9.3 22.5 0.0 0.0 23.1 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.1 0.0 4.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile Back0fQ(50°/0),veh/In 0.1 0.0 4.5 0.5 0.0 9.5 2.7 0.0 0.0 3.4 0.0 0.0 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 7.6 0.0 9.7 5.6 0.0 13.2 23.7 0.0 0.0 26.0 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS A A A B C C NBR SBL Approach Vol, veh/h Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS 435 9.6 A 806 12.5 B 171 23.7 C Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.4 37.0 14.8 4.7 38.7 14.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 7.0 6.0 4.0 7.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 30.0 9.0 4.0 30.0 9.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 3.0 10.2 8.8 2.2 18.7 7.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 6.7 0.0 0.0 5.0 0.4 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 14.6 HCM 2010 LOS B 203 26.0 C Red Barn Subdivision 02/05/2018 Delich Associates Synchro 9 Light Report recent am.syn Timing Report, Sorted By Phase Recent AM 9: SH66 & Colorado Phase Number 1 4- 1 2 4 5 6 8 Movement Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize Recall Mode Maximum Split (s) Maximum Split (`)/0) Minimum Split (s) Yellow Time (s) All -Red Time (s) Minimum Initial (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Minimum Gap (s) Time Before Reduce (s) Time To Reduce (s) Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Dual Entry Inhibit Max Start Time (s) End Time (s) Yield/Force Off (s) Yield/Force Off 170(s) Local Start Time (s) Local Yield (s) Local Yield 170(s) Intersection Summary WBL Lead Yes None 8 13.3% 8 3 1 3.5 3 3 0 0 EBTL SBTL Lag Yes Max None 37 15 61.7% 25.0% 15 15 5 4 2 2 5 5 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 0 8 45 8 45 0 4 38 54 4 38 54 52 0 37 56 30 46 56 30 46 EBL Lead Yes None 8 13.3% 8 3 1 3.5 3 3 0 0 No Yes 0 8 4 4 52 56 56 WBTL NBTL Lag Yes Max None 37 15 61.7% 25.0% 15 15 5 4 2 2 5 5 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 Yes Yes 8 45 38 38 0 30 30 Yes Yes 45 0 54 54 37 46 46 Cycle Length Control Type Natural Cycle 60 Actuated -Uncoordinated 60 Splits and Phases: 9: SH66 & Colorado •._'I .`'I .._'I T 8 s 37 s I 15 s =_=_ f�-T �- - �'(ire t•-- - s 37s 15 s Red Barn Subdivision 02/05/2018 Delich Associates Synchro 9 Light Report recent am.syn HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Recent PM 9: SH66 & Colorado Movement 7 � 4- k. .4\ EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL 1 NBT NBR SBL 1 SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) Future Volume (veh/h) Number Initial C (Qb), veh Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) Parkins Bus, Adj Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln Adj Flow Rate, veh/h Adj No. of Lanes Peak Hour Factor Percent Heavy Veh, % Cap, veh/h Arrive On Green Sat Flow, veh/h tri 127 127 5 0 1.00 1.00 1863 143 1 0.89 2 485 0.08 1774 621 91 48 621 91 48 2 12 1 0 0 0 1.00 1863 698 1.00 1.00 1900 93 1 0 0.89 0.89 2 2 880 117 0.55 0.53 1610 215 1.00 1.00 1863 54 1 0.89 2 348 0.05 1774 1+ 517 517 6 0 1.00 1863 581 1 0.89 2 909 0.52 1749 32 32 16 0 1.00 1.00 1900 32 0 0.89 2 50 0.50 96 50 50 3 0 1.00 1.00 1900 56 0 0.89 2 129 0.15 322 116 116 8 0 1.00 1863 130 1 0.89 2 179 0.17 1070 59 14 59 14 18 7 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1900 1900 41 16 0 0 0.89 0.89 2 2 51 94 0.15 0.15 307 146 4 70 70 4 0 1.00 1863 79 1 0.89 2 249 0.17 1484 34 34 14 0 1.00 1.00 1900 11 0 0.89 2 32 0.15 189 Grp Vo ume(v), veh/h Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In Q Serve(g_s), s Cycle 0 Clear(g_c), s Prop In Lane Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h V/C Ratio(X) Avail Cap(c_a). veh/h HCM Platoon Ratio Upstream Filter(l) Uniform Delay (d), s/veh Incr Delay (d2), s/veh Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh c/oile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh LnGrp LOS 143 0 791 54 1774 0 1825 1774 2.1 0.0 20.7 0.8 2.1 0.0 20.7 0.8 1.00 0.12 1.00 485 0 997 348 0.29 0.00 0.79 0.16 495 0 997 405 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 7.2 0.0 10.9 9.0 0.3 0.0 6.5 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 12.1 0.4 7.6 0.0 17.4 9.2 A B A 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.00 0 1.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 613 227 0 0 1846 1699 0 0 14.3 4.7 0.0 0.0 14.3 7.8 0.0 0.0 0.05 0.25 0.18 959 331 0 0 0.64 0.68 0.00 0.00 959 331 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 10.3 24.0 0.0 0.0 3.3 5.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.0 4.2 0.0 0.0 13.6 29.8 0.0 0.0 B C 106 1818 0.0 3.1 0.15 344 0.31 344 1.00 1.00 22.1 0.5 0.0 1.6 22.6 C 1.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.10 0 0 0.00 0 0 1.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Approach Vol. veh/h Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS Timer 934 15.9 B 1 2 3 4 667 13.2 B 227 29.8 C 5 6 7 8 106 22.6 C Assigned Phs 1 2 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.1 38.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 7.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 30.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I 1), s 2.8 22.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 4.5 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay HCM 2010 LOS 17.0 B 4 5 6 15.0 7.7 37.0 6.0 4.0 7.0 9.0 4.0 30.0 5.1 4.1 16.3 0.6 0.0 7.0 8 15.0 6.0 9.0 9.8 0.0 Red Barn Subdivision 02/06/2018 Synchro 9 Light Report Delich Associates recent pm.syn Timing Report, Sorted By Phase 9: SH66 & Colorado Recent PM Phase Number --w 1 4- r 1 2 4 5 6 8 Movement Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize Recall Mode Maximum Split (s) Maximum Split (%) Minimum Split (s) Yellow Time (s) All -Red Time (s) Minimum Initial (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Minimum Gap (s) Time Before Reduce (s) Time To Reduce (s) Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Dual Entry Inhibit Max Start Time (s) End Time (s) Yield/Force Off (s) Yield/Force Off 170(s) Local Start Time (s) Local Yield (s) Local Yield 170(s) Intersection Summary WBL Lead Yes None 8 13.3% 8 3 1 3.5 3 3 0 0 No Yes 0 8 4 4 52 56 56 EBTL SBTL EBL Lag Lead Yes Yes Max None None 37 15 8 61.7% 25.0% 13.3% 15 15 8 5 4 3 2 2 1 5 5 3.5 3 3 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Yes 8 45 38 38 0 30 30 Yes Yes 45 0 54 54 37 46 46 No Yes 0 8 4 4 52 56 56 WBTL NBTL Lag Yes Max None 37 15 61.7% 25.0% 15 15 5 4 2 2 5 5 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 Yes Yes 8 45 38 38 0 30 30 Yes Yes 45 0 54 54 37 46 46 Cycle Length Control Type Natural Cycle 60 Actuated -Uncoordinated 60 Splits and Phases: 9: SH66 & Colorado len 1 IIIIIDn ir ,.•-• 3s I 37s I ®15s I '`, �. 37 s a15 s Red Barn Subdivision 02/06/2018 Delich Associates Synchro 9 Light Report recent pm.syn HCM 2010 TWSC Recent AM 6: Colorado/WCR13 & WCR32 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Mcvement 0.6 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h Future Vol, veh/h Conflicting Peds, #/hr Sign Control RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade. % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, Mvmt Flow Major/Minor 4 6 2 5 6 2 5 0 0 0 Stop Stop Stop - None 92 2 7 Minor2 0 0 92 2 2 EDP 92 2 5 1 1 0 1 1 0 o 0 0 Stop Stop Stop - - None MIE - 0 - 0 92 92 92 2 2 2 1 1 0 Minor/ 4 4 0 Free 92 2 4 Major1 4 101 1 101 1 0 0 Free Free None 0 0 92 2 110 92 2 1 Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap -1 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver Mov Cap -2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach 332 332 208 212 212 120 120 7.12 6.52 6.22 6.12 5.52 6.12 5.52 - 3.518 4.018 3.318 621 588 832 790 727 884 796 618 585 832 618 585 788 726 880 794 EB 335 354 110 119 119 216 235 7.12 6.52 6.22 6.12 5.52 6.12 5.52 - 3.518 4.018 3.318 619 571 943 885 797 786 710 ENE 611 568 943 611 568 882 795 777 709 WB OM OE 230 4.12 IMP 2.218 1338 1338 NB 0 0 W EI IMP IPS 4 2 170 42 2 170 42 0 0 0 Free Free Free 92 2 2 Major2 - None MEN 0 0 92 2 185 92 2 46 111 0 0 ED 4.12 2.218 1479 1479 IME SB GE HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Minor Lane/Major Mvmt Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 10.4 B NBL NBT 1338 0.003 7.7 0 A A 0 NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL - 679 589 1479 - 0.021 0.004 0.001 - 10.4 11.1 7.4 0 - BB A A - 0.1 0 0 SBT SBR OE WO 0.3 0.1 Red Barn Subdivision 02/05/2018 Delich Associates Synchro 9 Light Report recent am.syn HCM 2010 TWSC Recent PM 6: Colorado/WCR13 & WCR32 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 4 4 4+ Traffic Vol, veh/h 61 6 7 3 5 1 4 247 1 1 103 7 Future Vol, veh/h 61 6 7 3 5 1 4 247 1 1 103 7 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None - None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 0 Grade, % - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 71 7 8 3 6 1 5 287 1 1 120 8 Major/Minor Conflicting Flow All 427 424 124 431 427 288 128 0 0 288 0 0 Stage 1 126 126 297 297 Stage 2 301 298 - 134 130 - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 538 522 927 535 520 751 1458 1274 Stage 1 878 792 712 668 Stage 2 708 667 869 789 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 531 519 927 523 517 751 1458 1274 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 531 519 523 517 Stage 1 874 791 709 665 Stage 2 698 664 853 788 Minor2 Minor/ Major1 Major2 Approach HCM Control Delay, s 12.7 HCM LOS EB WB NB SB 11.8 0.1 0.1 B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1458 - - 552 538 1274 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 - 0.156 0.019 0.001 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 0 - 12.7 11.8 7.8 0 HCM Lane LOS AA - BB A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.5 0.1 0 Red Barn Subdivision 02/06/2018 Synchro 9 Light Report Delich Associates recent pm.syn HCM 2010 TWSC Recent AM 3: East Frontage Road & WCR32 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4, 4, 4, 4, Traffic Vol, veh/h 6 17 10 2 14 10 3 17 1 23 75 3 Future Vol, veh/h 6 17 10 2 14 10 3 17 1 23 75 3 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - - None - None Storage Length - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 0 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 7 20 12 2 16 12 4 20 1 27 88 4 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 186 172 90 188 174 21 92 0 0 21 0 0 Stage 1 144 144 28 28 Stage 2 42 28 - 160 146 - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 775 721 968 772 719 1056 1503 1595 Stage 1 859 778 989 872 - Stage 2 972 872 842 776 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 741 706 968 734 704 1056 1503 1595 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 741 706 734 704 Stage 1 856 764 986 869 Stage 2 940 869 795 762 Approach HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS EB 9.9 A WB 9.6 A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1503 - - 776 810 1595 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 - 0.05 0.038 0.017 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.4 0 - 9.9 9.6 7.3 0 HCM Lane LOS A A - A A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.2 0.1 0.1 NB 1.1 SB 1.7 Red Barn Subdivision 02/05/2018 Synchro 9 Light Report Delich Associates recent am.syn HCM 2010 TWSC Recent PM 3: East Frontage Road & WCR32 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 4. 4.* 4. Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 7 9 0 17 23 24 107 1 12 27 4 Future Vol, veh/h 3 7 9 0 17 23 24 107 1 12 27 4 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None - None Storage Length - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 0 Grade, % - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 4 8 11 0 20 27 28 126 1 14 32 5 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 268 246 34 255 248 126 36 0 0 127 0 0 Stage 1 62 62 183 183 Stage 2 206 184 - 72 65 - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 685 656 1039 698 655 924 1575 1459 Stage 1 949 843 - 819 748 - Stage 2 796 747 938 841 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 635 637 1039 669 636 924 1575 1459 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 635 637 669 636 Stage 1 931 835 803 734 Stage 2 737 733 910 833 Approach HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS EB 9.8 A WB 9.9 A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1575 - - 779 775 1459 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.018 - 0.029 0.061 0.01 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.3 0 - 9.8 9.9 7.5 0 HCM Lane LOS A A - A A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 0.1 0.2 0 NB SB 1.3 2.1 Red Barn Subdivision 02/06/2018 Synchro 9 Light Report Delich Associates recent pm.syn UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level -of -Service Average Total Delay sec/veh A <10 B > 10 and < 15 C > 15 and < 25 D > 25 and < 35 E > 35 and < 50 F > 50 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level -of -Service Average Total Delay sec/veh A <10 B > 10 and < 20 C > 20 and < 35 D > 35 and < 55 E >55and <80 F > 80 APPENDIX D FIGURE 4C-4. WARRANT 3, PEAK HOUR (70% FACTOR) (COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,000 POPULATION OR ABOVE 70 KM/H (40 MPH) ON MAJOR STREET) HOVOIddV J DaLS 2:1ONIW EB PM 235 VPH EB AM 200 VPH 500 400 300 100 MUTCD, 2003 EDITION, PAGE 4C-7 2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES & 1 LANE) 2 OR MORE LANES 1LANE &1 LANE • 300 400 500 00 ANA VPH 700 8 0 900 PM 7Qc \/PI -I 100 *75 1000 1100 1200 1300 MAJOR STREET - TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACH - VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) *Note: 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor -street approach with two or more lanes and 75 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor -street approach with one lane. LONG RANGE BACKGROUND PEAK HOUR WARRANT AT COLORADO-WCR13/WCR32 FIGURE 4C-4. WARRANT 3, PEAK HOUR (70% FACTOR) (COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,000 POPULATION OR ABOVE 70 KM/H (40 MPH) ON MAJOR STREET) HdA - H0VO2:IddV _LD311.S 2IONIW EB PM 255 VPH EB AM 225 VPH 500 400 300 200 100 MUTCD, 2003 EDITION, PAGE 4C-7 2 R MORE LANES & 2 OR MCRE LANES & 1 LANE) 2 OR MORE LANES O1 LANE &1 LANE 300 400 500 600 ANA Ran VPH *100 *75 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 PrA RQn \/PH MAJOR STREET - TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACH - VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) *Note: 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor -street approach with two or more lanes and 75 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor -street approach with one lane. LONG RANGE TOTAL PEAK HOUR WARRANT AT COLORADO-WCR13/WCR32 APPENDIX E HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Short Bkgrd AM 9: SH66 & Colorado Movement .) 7 4-- EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL t NBT NBR SBL 1 SBT SBR r Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) Future Volume (veh/h) Number Initial Q (Qb), veh Ped-Bike Adj(A__pbT) Parking Bus, Adj Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln Adj Flow Rate, veh/h Adj No. of Lanes Peak Hour Factor Percent Heavy Veh, Cap. veh/h Arrive On Green Sat Flow, veh/h 15 15 5 0 1.00 1.00 1863 16 1 0.92 2 306 0.03 1774 398 52 77 398 52 77 2 12 1 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1900 1863 433 48 84 1 0 1 0.92 0.92 0.92 2 2 2 872 97 560 0.53 0.51 0.06 1648 183 1774 1 760 760 6 0 1.00 1863 826 1 0.92 2 1024 0.56 1829 13 13 16 0 1.00 1.00 1900 13 0 0.92 2 16 0.54 29 28 28 3 0 1.00 1.00 1900 30 0 0.92 2 100 0.15 174 4 87 137 100 87 137 100 8 18 7 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1900 1900 95 72 109 1 0 0 0.92 0.92 0.92 2 2 2 161 110 205 0.17 0.15 0.15 945 644 669 4+ 81 39 81 39 4 14 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1900 88 29 1 0 0.92 0.92 2 2 111 33 0.17 0.15 650 194 Grp Volume(v), veh/h Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In Q Serve(g_s), s Cycle Q Clear(g_c). s Prop In Lane Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h V/C Ratio(X) Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h HCM Platoon Ratio Upstream Filter(I) Uniform Delay (d), s/veh Incr Delay (d2), s/veh Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh %Ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh LnGrp LOS 16 0 481 1774 0 1831 0.2 0.0 9.9 0.2 0.0 9.9 1.00 0.10 306 0 968 0.05 0.00 0.50 403 0 968 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 9.0 0.0 8.9 0.1 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 5.4 9.1 0.0 10.7 A B 84 1774 1.2 1.2 1.00 560 0.15 602 1.00 1.00 5.9 0.1 0.0 0.6 6.0 A 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.00 0 1.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 839 1858 21.3 21.3 0.02 1040 0.81 1040 1.00 1.00 10.4 6.7 0.0 12.7 17.1 B 197 1763 0.0 6.2 0.15 342 0.58 342 1.00 1.00 23.0 2.4 0.0 3.3 25.4 C 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.00 0 1.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.37 0 0.00 0 1.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 226 1513 2.5 8.7 0.48 323 0.70 323 1.00 1.00 24.0 6.5 0.0 4.2 30.5 C 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.00 0 1.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.13 0 0.00 0 1.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Approach Vol. veh/h Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS Timer 497 10.6 B 1 2 3 4 923 16.1 B 197 25.4 C 5 6 7 8 226 30.5 C Assigned Phs Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s Change Period (Y+Rc), s Max Green Setting (Gmax), s Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s Green Ext Time (p_c), s Intersection Summary 1 6.6 4.0 4.0 3.2 0.0 2 37.0 7.0 30.0 11.9 7.7 4 15.0 6.0 9.0 10.7 0.0 5 4.8 4.0 4.0 2.2 0.0 6 38.8 7.0 30.0 23.3 4.0 8 15.0 6.0 9.0 8.2 0.2 HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay HCM 2010 LOS 17.4 B Red Barn Subdivision 02/06/2018 Delich Associates Synchro 9 Light Report sb am.syn Timing Report, Sorted By Phase Short Bkgrd AM 9: SH66 & Colorado 4 - Phase Number 1 2 4 5 6 8 Movement WBL EBTL SBTL EBL WBTL NBTL Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Max None None Max None Maximum Split (s) 8 37 15 8 37 15 Maximum Split (`)/0) 13.3% 61.7% 25.0% 13.3% 61.7°/s 25.0% Minimum Split (s) 8 15 15 8 15 15 Yellow Time (s) 3 5 4 3 5 4 All -Red Time (s) 1 2 2 1 2 2 Minimum Initial (s) 3.5 5 5 3.5 5 5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 Minimum Gap (s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 Time Before Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Dual Entry No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Inhibit Max Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Start Time (s) 0 8 45 0 8 45 End Time (s) 8 45 0 8 45 0 Yield/Force Off (s) 4 38 54 4 38 54 Yield/Force Off 170(s) 4 38 54 4 38 54 Local Start Time (s) 52 0 37 52 0 37 Local Yield (s) 56 30 46 56 30 46 Local Yield 170(s) 56 30 46 56 30 46 Intersection Summary Cycle Length Control Type Natural Cycle 60 Actuated -Uncoordinated 80 Splits and Phases: 9: SH66 & Colorado iso I 'Or) 7 35 1 r-'� sLS' 5 3 7 s _________K Red Barn Subdivision 02/06/2018 Delich Associates Synchro 9 Light Report sb am.syn HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Short Bkgrd PM 9: SH66 & Colorado Movement l\T 4--- EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL t •\ t NBT NBR SBL l SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) Future Volume (veh/h) Number Initial Q (Qb), veh Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) Parking Bus, Adj Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In Adj Flow Rate, veh/h Adj No. of Lanes Peak Hour Factor Percent Heavy Veh, % Cap, veh/h Arrive On Green Sat Flow, veh/h 145 708 103 55 592 145 708 103 55 592 5 2 12 1 6 0 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 163 796 107 62 665 1 1 0 1 1 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 2 2 2 2 2 430 878 118 278 902 0.08 0.55 0.53 0.05 0.52 1774 1608 216 1774 1745 37 37 16 0 0 1.00 1.00 1900 38 0 0.89 2 52 0.50 100 4 55 122 70 17 55 122 70 17 3 8 18 7 0 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1900 1863 1900 1900 62 137 52 19 0 1 0 0 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 2 2 2 2 131 169 59 96 0.15 0.17 0.15 0.15 334 1014 352 161 4 75 38 75 38 4 14 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1900 84 15 1 0 0.89 0.89 2 2 234 38 0.17 0.15 1406 228 Grp Volume(v), veh/h Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In Q Serve(g_s), s Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s Prop In Lane Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h V/C Ratio(X) Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h HCM Platoon Ratio Upstream Filter(I) Uniform Delay (d), s/veh Incr Delay (d2). s/veh Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh LnGrp LOS 163 1774 2.4 2.4 1.00 430 0.38 430 1.00 1.00 8.7 0.6 0.0 1.2 9.2 A 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.00 0 1.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 903 1825 26.7 26.7 0.12 996 0.91 996 1.00 1.00 12.3 13.3 0.0 17.0 25.7 C 62 1774 0.9 0.9 1.00 278 0.22 329 1.00 1.00 11.5 0.4 0.0 0.5 11.9 B 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.00 0 1.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 703 251 1845 1701 17.9 5.3 17.9 8.8 0.05 0.25 953 330 0.74 0.76 953 330 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 11.3 24.6 5.1 9.9 0.0 0.0 10.3 5.1 16.4 34.5 B C 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.00 0 1.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 118 0 1795 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.5 0.21 0.16 0 339 0.00 0.35 0 339 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.0 22.4 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.0 23.0 C 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.00 0 1.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.13 0 0.00 0 1.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Approach Vol, veh/h Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS Timer 1066 23.1 C 765 16.1 B 251 34.5 C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 118 23.0 C Assigned Phs Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc). s Change Period (Y+Rc), s Max Green Setting (Gmax), s Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I 1), s Green Ext Time (p_c), s Intersection Summary 1 6.3 4.0 4.0 2.9 0.0 2 38.7 7.0 30.0 28.7 1.0 4 15.0 6.0 9.0 5.5 0.6 5 8.0 4.0 4.0 4.4 0.0 6 37.0 7.0 30.0 19.9 6.6 8 15.0 6.0 9.0 10.8 0.0 HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay HCM 2010 LOS 22.0 C Red Barn Subdivision 02/06/2018 Delich Associates Synchro 9 Light Report sb pm.syn Timing Report, Sorted By Phase 9: SH66 & Colorado Short Bkgrd PM Phase Number 1 4-- t 1 2 4 5 6 8 Movement WBL EBTL SBTL EBL WBTL NBTL Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Max None None Max None Maximum Split (s) 8 37 15 8 37 15 Maximum Split (3/0) 13.3% 61.7% 25.0% 13.3% 61.7% 25.00/o Minimum Split (s) 8 15 15 8 15 15 Yellow Time (s) 3 5 4 3 5 4 Al -Red Time (s) 1 2 2 1 2 2 Minimum Initial (s) 3.5 5 5 3.5 5 5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 Minimum Gap (s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 Time Before Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Dual Entry No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Inhibit Max Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Start Time (s) 0 8 45 0 8 45 End Time (s) 8 45 0 8 45 0 Yield/Force Off (s) 4 38 54 4 38 54 Yield/Force Off 170(s) 4 38 54 4 38 54 Local Start Time (s) 52 0 37 52 0 37 Local Yield (s) 56 30 46 56 30 46 Local Yield 170(s) 56 30 46 56 30 46 Intersection Summary Cycle Length Control Type Natural Cycle 60 Actuated -Uncoordinated 80 Splits and Phases: 9: SH66 & Colorado 101 ---I; 2 04 8 s 37s, .43.0-4., , ,,,,, ,., , .,, � . ..) 0 4-- t CIA a•—• ...• Red Barn Subdivision 02/06/2018 Delich Associates Synchro 9 Light Report sb pm.syn HCM 2010 TWSC Short Bkgrd AM 6: Colorado/WCR13 & WCR32 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 4 4 4+ Traffic Vol, veh/h 6 2 6 1 1 0 5 111 1 2 190 46 Future Vol, veh/h 6 2 6 1 1 0 5 111 1 2 190 46 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None - - None Storage Length - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 0 Grade, % - 0 - 0 - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 7 2 7 1 1 0 5 121 1 2 207 50 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor/ Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 369 369 232 372 393 121 257 0 0 122 0 0 Stage 1 236 236 132 132 Stage 2 133 133 - 240 261 - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 588 560 807 585 543 930 1308 1465 Stage 1 767 710 871 787 Stage 2 870 786 763 692 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 584 557 807 576 540 930 1308 1465 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 584 557 576 540 Stage 1 764 709 868 784 Stage 2 865 783 753 691 Approach HCM Control Delay, s 10.6 HCM LOS EB WB NB SB 11.5 0.3 0.1 B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBREBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1308 - - 657 557 1465 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.004 - 0.023 0.004 0.001 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.8 0 - 10.6 11.5 7.5 0 HCM Lane LOS AA - BB A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.1 0 0 Red Barn Subdivision 02/06/2018 Synchro 9 Light Report Delich Associates sb am.syn 6: Colorado/WCR13 & WCR32 HCM 2010 TWSC Short Bkgrd PM Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 4 4 4 Traffic Vol, veh/h 68 6 8 3 5 1 5 275 1 1 114 8 Future Vol, veh/h 68 6 8 3 5 1 5 275 1 1 114 8 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - - None - - None - None Storage Length - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 0 Grade, % - 0 - 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 79 7 9 3 6 1 6 320 1 1 133 9 Major/Minor Minor2 Minorl Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 475 473 137 480 476 320 142 0 0 321 0 0 Stage 1 140 140 332 332 Stage 2 335 333 - 148 144 - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 500 490 911 496 488 721 1441 1239 Stage 1 863 781 681 644 Stage 2 679 644 855 778 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 492 487 911 483 485 721 1441 1239 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 492 487 483 485 Stage 1 859 780 678 641 Stage 2 668 641 838 777 Approach HCM Control Delay, s 13.6 HCM LOS EB WB NB SB 12.3 0.1 0.1 B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1441 - 515 503 1239 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.004 - 0.185 0.021 0.001 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 0 - 13.6 12.3 7.9 0 HCM Lane LOS AA - BB A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.7 0.1 0 - Red Barn Subdivision 02/06/2018 Synchro 9 Light Report Delich Associates sb pm.syn HCM 2010 TWSC Short Bkgrd AM 3: East Frontage Road & WCR32 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 4+ 4+ 4+ Traffic Vol, veh/h 6 19 11 2 16 11 3 19 1 25 83 3 Future Vol, veh/h 6 19 11 2 16 11 3 19 1 25 83 3 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - - None - None Storage Length - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 0 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 7 22 13 2 19 13 4 22 1 29 98 4 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 204 189 99 206 190 23 101 0 0 24 0 0 Stage 1 158 158 30 30 Stage 2 46 31 - 176 160 - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 754 706 957 752 705 1054 1491 1591 Stage 1 844 767 987 870 - Stage 2 968 869 826 766 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 717 691 957 711 690 1054 1491 1591 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 717 691 711 690 - Stage 1 841 752 984 867 Stage 2 933 866 776 751 Approach EB HCM Control Delay, s 10 HCM LOS B WB 9.7 A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1491 - - 760 796 1591 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 - 0.056 0.043 0.018 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.4 0 - 10 9.7 7.3 0 HCM Lane LOS A A - B A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.2 0.1 0.1 NB 1 SB 1.6 Red Barn Subdivision 02/06/2018 Synchro 9 Light Report Delich Associates sb am.syn 3: East Frontage Road & WCR32 HCM 2010 TWSC Short Bkgrd PM Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4+ 4+ 4+ 4+ Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 8 10 0 19 25 27 118 1 13 30 4 Future Vol, veh/h 3 8 10 0 19 25 27 118 1 13 30 4 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - - None - None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 0 Grade, % - 0 - 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 4 9 12 0 22 29 32 139 1 15 35 5 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 297 272 38 282 274 139 40 0 0 140 0 0 Stage 1 68 68 203 203 Stage 2 229 204 - 79 71 - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 655 635 1034 670 633 909 1570 1443 Stage 1 942 838 - 799 733 Stage 2 774 733 930 836 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 601 614 1034 638 612 909 1570 1443 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 601 614 638 612 Stage 1 921 829 781 717 Stage 2 710 717 899 827 Approach HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS EB 9.9 A WB NB SB 10.1 1.4 2.1 B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1570 - - 758 752 1443 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.02 - 0.033 0.069 0.011 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.3 0 - 9.9 10.1 7.5 0 HCM Lane LOS AA - A B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 0.1 0.2 0 Red Barn Subdivision 02/06/2018 Synchro 9 Light Report Delich Associates sb pm.syn APPENDIX F HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Long Bkgrd AM 9: SH66 & Colorado Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ) 44 r li 1t ?r vi • r ) T r Traffic Volume (veh/h) 25 575 75 110 1105 40 35 140 200 205 160 65 Future Volume (veh/h) 25 575 75 110 1105 40 35 140 200 205 160 65 Number 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 18 7 4 14 Initial 0 (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 26 605 0 116 1163 0 37 147 18 216 168 0 Adj No. of Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 275 1428 639 490 1563 699 323 250 212 355 323 274 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.40 0.00 0.08 0.44 0.00 0.05 0.13 0.13 0.09 0.17 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 3539 1583 1774 3539 1583 1774 1863 1583 1774 1863 1583 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 26 605 0 116 1163 0 37 147 18 216 168 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 1770 1583 1774 1770 1583 1774 1863 1583 1774 1863 1583 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.5 7.0 0.0 2.0 15.6 0.0 1.0 4.2 0.6 5.0 4.7 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.5 7.0 0.0 2.0 15.6 0.0 1.0 4.2 0.6 5.0 4.7 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 275 1428 639 490 1563 699 323 250 212 355 323 274 V/C Ratio(X) 0.09 0.42 0.00 0.24 0.74 0.00 0.11 0.59 0.08 0.61 0.52 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 363 1428 639 510 1563 699 393 327 278 355 327 278 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(l) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 10.7 12.2 0.0 8.3 13.2 0.0 19.5 23.2 21.6 19.8 21.4 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.9 0.0 0.2 3.3 0.0 0.2 2.2 0.2 3.0 1.4 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 0.2 3.5 0.0 1.0 8.3 0.0 0.5 2.3 0.3 1.1 2.5 0.0 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 10.8 13.2 0.0 8.5 16.5 0.0 19.6 25.4 21.8 22.8 22.8 0.0 LnGrp LOS B B A B BCCCC Approach Vol, veh/h 631 1279 202 384 Approach Delay, s/veh 13.1 15.8 24.0 22.8 Approach LOS B B C C Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.4 29.0 5.8 14.9 5.2 31.2 8.0 12.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 7.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 7.0 4.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 22.0 4.0 9.0 4.0 22.0 4.0 9.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.0 9.0 3.0 6.7 2.5 17.6 7.0 6.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 8.3 0.0 0.4 0.0 3.4 0.0 0.4 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 16.8 HCM 2010 LOS B Red Barn Subdivision 02/08/2018 Delich Associates Synchro 9 Light Report lb am.syn Timing Report, Sorted By Phase 9: SH66 & Colorado Long Bkgrd AM Phase Number 4\ iv 1 2 3 4 5 1-- 6 7 8 Movement Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize Recall Mode Maximum Split (s) Maximum Split (%) Minimum Split (s) Yellow Time (s) All -Red Time (s) Minimum Initial (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Minimum Gap (s) Time Before Reduce (s) Time To Reduce (s) Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Dual Entry Inhibit Max Start Time (s) End Time (s) Yield/Force Off (s) Yield/Force Off 170(s) Local Start Time (s) Local Yield (s) Local Yield 170(s) Intersection Summary WBL Lead Yes None 8 13.3% 8 3 1 3.5 3 3 0 0 No Yes 0 8 4 4 52 56 56 EBTL Lag Yes Max 29 48.3% 15 5 2 5 3 3 0 0 Yes Yes 8 37 30 30 0 22 22 NBL Lead Yes None 8 13.3% 8 3 1 4 3 3 0 0 SBTL Lag Yes None 15 25.0% 15 4 2 5 3 3 0 0 EBL Lead Yes None 8 13.3% 8 3 1 3.5 3 3 0 0 No Yes No Yes Yes Yes 37 45 0 45 0 8 41 54 4 41 54 4 29 37 52 33 46 56 33 46 56 WBTL Lag Yes Max 29 48.3% 15 5 2 5 3 3 0 0 Yes Yes 8 37 30 30 0 22 22 SBL Lead Yes None 8 13.3% 8 3 1 4 3 3 0 0 No Yes 37 45 41 41 29 33 33 NBTL Lag Yes None 15 25.0% 15 4 2 5 3 3 0 0 Yes Yes 45 0 54 54 37 46 46 Cycle Length Control Type Natural Cycle 60 Actuated -Uncoordinated 60 Splits and Phases: 9: SH66 & Colorado `, , —Dr U J4 7 L 29s z�.., J - _ , 4— \II08 ;`.� n s �"`u S$ Red Barn Subdivision 02/08/2018 Delich Associates Synchro 9 Light Report lb am.syn 9 SH66 & Colorado Queues Long Bkgrd AM Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 26 605 79 116 1163 42 37 147 211 216 168 68 v/c Ratio 0 09 0 43 010 ' 0 25 0 72 0 05 0 09 0 49 0 48 0 56 0 37 012 Control Delay 6 5 14 3 0 3 7 6 17 8 01 14 4 29 0 7 9 22 9 23 3 0 4 Queue Delay 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Total Delay 65 143 03 76 178 01 144 290 79 229 233 04 Queue Length 50th (ft) 4 82 0 17 145 0 9 49 0 58 46 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 12 122 0 36 #311 0 26 97 46 #113 109 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2644 2413 1876 5322 Turn Bay Length (ft) 450 400 450 400 250 250 250 250 Base Capacity (vph) 286 1419 754 460 1609 828 391 324 456 386 459 554 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0 09 0 43 010 0 25 0 72 0 05 0 09 0 45 0 46 0 56 0 37 0 12 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer Queue shown is maximum after two cycles Red Barn Subdivision 02/08/2018 Synchro 9 Light Report Delich Associates lb am syn HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Long Bkgrd PM 9: SH66 & Colorado Movement y EBL EBT EBR WBL 4-- WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations '1 +4 r 'i aft r vii t r ) + r Traffic Volume (veh/h) 225 1020 150 80 860 120 80 220 110 65 140 60 Future Volume (veh/h) 225 1020 150 80 860 120 80 220 110 65 140 60 Number 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 18 7 4 14 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 237 1074 38 84 905 0 84 232 0 68 147 0 Adj No. of Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 403 1466 656 316 1328 594 359 316 268 293 301 255 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.41 0.41 0.06 0.38 0.00 0.07 0.17 0.00 0.06 0.16 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 3539 1583 1774 3539 1583 1774 1863 1583 1774 1863 1583 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 237 1074 38 84 905 0 84 232 0 68 147 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 1770 1583 1774 1770 1583 1774 1863 1583 1774 1863 1583 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.5 15.0 0.8 1.6 12.6 0.0 2.2 6.9 0.0 1.8 4.2 0.0 Cycle 0 Clear(g_c), s 4.5 15.0 0.8 1.6 12.6 0.0 2.2 6.9 0.0 1.8 4.2 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 403 1466 656 316 1328 594 359 316 268 293 301 255 V/C Ratio(X) 0.59 0.73 0.06 0.27 0.68 0.00 0.23 0.73 0.00 0.23 0.49 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 403 1466 656 355 1328 594 385 318 270 333 318 270 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(l) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 11.1 14.4 10.3 11.3 15.4 0.0 18.3 23.1 0.0 18.7 22.4 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.2 3.3 0.2 0.4 2.8 0.0 0.3 8.5 0.0 0.4 1.2 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 2.4 7.8 0.4 0.8 6.6 0.0 1.1 4.3 0.0 0.9 2.3 0.0 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 13.4 17.7 10.5 11.8 18.2 0.0 18.6 31.6 0.0 19.1 23.6 0.0 LnGrp LOS B B B B B B C B C Approach Vol, veh/h Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS Timer 1349 16.7 B 989 17.7 B 316 28.1 C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 215 22.2 C Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.7 30.3 7.2 14.5 9.0 28.0 6.7 14.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 7.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 7.0 4.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 22.0 4.0 9.0 5.0 21.0 4.0 9.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.6 17.0 4.2 6.2 6.5 14.6 3.8 8.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 4.1 0.0 0.5 0.0 5.1 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 18.7 HCM 2010 LOS B Red Barn Subdivision 02/08/2018 Synchro 9 Light Report Delich Associates lb pm.syn Timing Report, Sorted By Phase 9: SH66 & Colorado Long Bkgrd PM Phase Number 4. t 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Movement Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize Recall Mode Maximum Split (s) Maximum Split (%) Minimum Split (s) Yellow Time (s) All -Red Time (s) Minimum Initial (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Minimum Gap (s) Time Before Reduce (s) Time To Reduce (s) Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Dual Entry Inhibit Max Start Time (s) End Time (s) Yield/Force Off (s) Yield/Force Off 170(s) Local Start Time (s) Local Yield (s) Local Yield 170(s) Intersection Summary Cycle Length Control Type Natural Cycle WBL EBTL Lead Lag Yes Yes None Max 8 29 13.3% 48.3% 8 15 3 5 1 2 3.5 5 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 No Yes 0 8 4 4 51 55 55 NBL SBTL Lead Lag Yes Yes None None 8 15 13.3% 25.0% 8 15 3 4 1 2 4 5 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 EBL WBTL Lead Lag Yes Yes None Max 9 28 15.0% 46.7% 8 15 3 5 1 2 3.5 5 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 SBL NBTL Lead Lag Yes Yes None None 8 15 13.3°/s 25.0% 8 15 3 4 1 2 4 5 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 37 45 0 9 37 45 37 45 0 9 37 45 0 30 41 54 5 30 41 54 30 41 54 5 30 41 54 59 28 36 51 0 28 36 21 32 45 56 21 32 45 21 32 45 56 21 32 45 60 Actuated -Uncoordinated 60 Splits and Phases: 9: SH66 & Colorado cot 7 03 $*04 8s I Ef29s 8s del ;. 4-- nits; 9s 28s III8s I Red Barn Subdivision 02/08/2018 Delich Associates Synchro 9 Light Report lb pm.syn Queues Long Bkgrd PM 9: SH66 & Colorado k 4\ t P `► 1 4/ Lane Group Lane Group Flow (vph) 237 1074 158 84 905 126 84 232 116 68 147 63 v/c Ratio 0.68 0.71 0.20 0.29 0.67 0.17 0.23 0.64 0.24 0.21 0.47 0.14 Control Delay 19.2 18.5 2.0 8.7 18.6 1.3 15.8 33.6 1.4 15.7 28.3 0.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 19.2 18.5 2.0 8.7 18.6 1.3 15.8 33.6 1.4 15.7 28.3 0.7 Queue Length 50th (ft) 38 174 0 12 142 0 21 81 0 17 49 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) #109 245 20 28 202 10 48 #177 3 40 97 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2644 2413 1876 5322 Turn Bay Length (ft) 450 400 450 400 250 250 250 250 Base Capacity (vph) 350 1516 792 292 1344 725 373 368 487 331 321 453 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.68 0.71 0.20 0.29 0.67 0.17 0.23 0.63 0.24 0.21 0.46 0.14 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Red Barn Subdivision 02/08/2018 Synchro 9 Light Report Delich Associates lb pm.syn 6: Colorado/WCR13 & WCR32 HCM 2010 TWSC Long Bkgrd AM Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 'I 1 4+ 1 1 1 r Traffic Vol, veh/h 75 5 120 5 5 5 45 160 5 5 280 90 Future Vol, veh/h 75 5 120 5 5 5 45 160 5 5 280 90 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None None Storage Length 250 - 250 250 250 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 0 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 79 5 126 5 5 5 47 168 5 5 295 95 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 576 573 295 637 571 171 295 0 0 174 0 0 Stage 1 305 305 266 266 Stage 2 271 268 - 371 305 - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 428 430 744 390 431 873 1266 1403 Stage 1 705 662 739 689 Stage 2 735 687 649 662 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 408 413 744 311 414 873 1266 1403 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 408 413 311 414 Stage 1 679 660 712 663 Stage 2 698 661 533 660 Approach HCM Control Delay, s 12.9 HCM LOS EB WB NB SB 13.4 1.7 0.1 B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1266 - - 408 721 443 1403 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.037 - 0.193 0.182 0.036 0.004 HCM Control Delay (s) 8 - 15.9 11.1 13.4 7.6 HCM Lane LOS A - C B B A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 0.7 0.7 0.1 0 Red Barn Subdivision 02/08/2018 Synchro 9 Light Report Delich Associates lb am.syn HCM 2010 TWSC Long Bkgrd PM 6: Colorado/WCR13 & WCR32 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 8.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ii t 4 'I I 11 i r Traffic Vol, veh/h 140 5 90 5 5 5 135 400 5 5 165 85 Future Vol, veh/h 140 5 90 5 5 5 135 400 5 5 165 85 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - - None - None None Storage Length 250 - 250 250 250 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 0 Grade, % - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 147 5 95 5 5 5 142 421 5 5 174 89 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 897 895 174 942 892 424 174 0 0 426 0 0 Stage 1 184 184 708 708 - Stage 2 713 711 - 234 184 - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 261 280 869 243 281 630 1403 1133 Stage 1 818 747 426 438 Stage 2 423 436 769 747 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 234 251 869 196 251 630 1403 1133 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 234 251 196 251 - Stage 1 735 744 383 394 Stage 2 372 392 677 744 Approach HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS EB WB 30.1 18.6 D C NB 2 Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) SB 0.2 1403 - - 234 769 281 1133 0.101 - 0.63 0.13 0.056 0.005 7.9 - 43.4 10.4 18.6 8.2 A - E BC A 0.3 - 3.8 0.4 0.2 0 Red Barn Subdivision 02/08/2018 Synchro 9 Light Report Delich Associates lb pm.syn HCM 2010 TWSC Long Bkgrd AM 3: East Frontage Road & WCR32 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 6.4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 44 4+ 1+ 'I 1+ Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 35 15 70 35 50 5 30 30 45 120 5 Future Vol, veh/h 10 35 15 70 35 50 5 30 30 45 120 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - - None - None Storage Length 250 250 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 0 Grade, % - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 11 37 16 74 37 53 5 32 32 47 126 5 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 327 298 129 308 284 47 132 0 0 63 0 0 Stage 1 224 224 58 58 Stage 2 103 74 - 250 226 - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 626 614 921 644 625 1022 1453 1540 Stage 1 779 718 954 847 - Stage 2 903 833 754 717 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 552 593 921 587 604 1022 1453 1540 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 552 593 587 604 - Stage 1 776 696 951 844 Stage 2 816 830 680 695 Approach EB HCM Control Delay, s 11.2 HCM LOS WB NB 11.9 0.6 B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1453 - - 642 685 1540 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.004 - 0.098 0.238 0.031 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 - 11.2 11.9 7.4 HCM Lane LOS A - BB A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.3 0.9 0.1 SB 2 Red Barn Subdivision 02/08/2018 Synchro 9 Light Report Delich Associates lb am.syn HCM 2010 TWSC Long Bkgrd PM 3: East Frontage Road & WCR32 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 5.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 4+ ' Ti I Ti Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 20 15 50 35 60 40 170 80 60 45 5 Future Vol, veh/h 5 20 15 50 35 60 40 170 80 60 45 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - - None None Storage Length 250 250 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 0 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 5 21 16 53 37 63 42 179 84 63 47 5 Major/Minor Conflicting Flow All 531 523 50 500 484 221 53 0 0 263 0 0 Stage 1 176 176 305 305 Stage 2 355 347 - 195 179 - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 459 459 1018 481 483 819 1553 1301 Stage 1 826 753 - 705 662 Stage 2 662 635 807 751 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver ' 375 425 1018 430 447 819 1553 1301 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 375 425 430 447 Stage 1 804 717 686 644 Stage 2 560 618 734 715 Minor2 Minor/ Major1 Major2 Approach HCM Control Delay, s 12.3 HCM LOS EB WB 14.2 B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBREBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1553 - - 532 541 1301 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.027 - - 0.079 0.282 0.049 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.4 - 12.3 14.2 7.9 HCM Lane LOS A - B B A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 0.3 1.2 0.2 NB 1 SB 4.3 Red Barn Subdivision 02/08/2018 Synchro 9 Light Report Delich Associates lb pm.syn APPENDIX G HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Short Total AM 9: SH66 & Colorado Existing Geometry Movement -f __, c EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ¶ I, 11 1 4, 4, Traffic Volume (veh/h) 25 398 52 77 760 20 28 91 137 118 94 68 Future Volume (veh/h) 25 398 52 77 760 20 28 91 137 118 94 68 Number 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 18 7 4 14 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1900 1863 1900 1900 1863 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 27 433 52 84 826 21 30 99 100 128 102 60 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 292 933 112 542 1064 27 76 183 165 177 115 61 Arrive On Green 0.03 0.57 0.56 0.05 0.59 0.58 0.21 0.22 0.21 0.21 0.22 0.21 SatFlow,veh/h 1774 1632 196 1774 1809 46 134 817 737 531 514 273 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 27 0 485 84 0 847 229 0 0 290 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 0 1828 1774 0 1855 1688 0 0 1318 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.5 0.0 13.8 1.7 0.0 30.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.2 0.0 0.0 Cycle 0 Clear(g_c), s 0.5 0.0 13.8 1.7 0.0 30.9 10.8 0.0 0.0 19.0 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.11 1.00 0.02 0.13 0.44 0.44 0.21 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 292 0 1045 542 0 1092 405 0 0 339 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.09 0.00 0.46 0.15 0.00 0.78 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.86 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 337 0 1045 558 0 1092 405 0 0 339 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(l) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 12.2 0.0 11.2 7.9 0.0 13.9 31.3 0.0 0.0 35.1 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.0 1.5 0.1 0.0 5.4 1.8 0.0 0.0 18.9 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 0.3 0.0 7.3 0.8 0.0 17.2 5.4 0.0 0.0 8.9 0.0 0.0 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 12.4 0.0 12.7 8.0 0.0 19.3 33.1 0.0 0.0 53.9 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS B B A B C D Approach Vol, veh/h Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS 512 12.6 B 931 18.3 B 229 33.1 C Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 290 53.9 D Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.2 57.0 25.0 5.7 58.5 25.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 7.0 6.0 4.0 7.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 50.0 19.0 4.0 50.0 19.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 3.7 15.8 21.0 2.5 32.9 12.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 9.9 0.0 0.0 7.6 1.6 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay HCM 2010 LOS 23.8 C Red Barn Subdivision 02/07/2018 Synchro 9 Light Report Delich Associates st am.syn Timing Report, Sorted By Phase 9: SH66 & Colorado Short Total AM Existing Geometry Phase Number 1 1 2 4 5 4--- 1 6 8 Movement Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize Recall Mode Maximum Split (s) Maximum Split (%) Minimum Split (s) Yellow Time (s) All -Red Time (s) Minimum Initial (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Minimum Gap (s) Time Before Reduce (s) Time To Reduce (s) Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Dual Entry Inhibit Max Start Time (s) End Time (s) Yield/Force Off (s) Yield/Force Off 170(s) Local Start Time (s) Local Yield (s) Local Yield 170(s) Intersection Summary Cycle Length Control Type Natural Cycle WBL Lead Yes None 8 8.9% 8 3 1 3.5 3 3 0 0 No Yes 0 8 4 4 82 86 86 EBTL Lag Yes Max 57 63.3% 15 5 2 5 3 3 0 0 Yes Yes 8 65 58 58 0 50 50 SBTL EBL Lead Yes None None 25 8 27.8% 8.9% 15 8 4 3 2 1 5 3.5 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 Yes No Yes Yes 65 0 0 8 84 4 84 4 57 82 76 86 76 86 90 Actuated -Uncoordinated 90 Splits and Phases: 9: SH66 & Colorado !�+ I,•_ —Orr? 04 8s r 57s _25s I Z - - - tO8 8s } 57s 25s - ■ WBTL NBTL Lag Yes Max None 57 25 63.3% 27.8% 15 15 5 4 2 2 5 5 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 65 65 0 58 84 58 84 0 57 50 76 50 76 Red Barn Subdivision 02/07/2018 Delich Associates Synchro 9 Light Report st am.syn Queues Short Total AM 9: SH66 & Colorado Existing Geometry t Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 27 490 84 848 278 304 v/c Ratio 0.09 0.46 0.15 0.75 0.68 1.30 Control Delay 5.1 12.6 5.3 18.4 34.9 194.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 5.1 12.6 5.3 18.4 34.9 194.6 Queue Length 50th (ft) 4 149 13 271 115 -220 Queue Length 95th (ft) 12 225 27 537 #209 #382 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2644 2413 1876 2383 Turn Bay Length (ft) 450 450 Base Capacity (vph) 303 1062 554 1138 406 233 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.09 0.46 0.15 0.75 0.68 1.30 Intersection Summary - Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Red Barn Subdivision 02/07/2018 Synchro 9 Light Report Delich Associates st am.syn HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Short Total PM 9: SH66 & Colorado Existing Geometry Nt c t 4\ t P 1 4/ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 t ) 1 4 4., Traffic Volume (veh/h) 178 708 103 55 592 57 55 137 70 29 84 57 Future Volume (veh/h) 178 708 103 55 592 57 55 137 70 29 84 57 Number 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 18 7 4 14 Initial 0 (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1900 1863 1900 1900 1863 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 200 796 109 62 665 60 62 154 62 33 94 42 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 434 983 135 296 977 88 106 193 72 86 194 77 Arrive On Green 0.07 0.61 0.60 0.04 0.58 0.57 0.18 0.19 0.18 0.18 0.19 0.18 Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 1604 220 1774 1684 152 298 1016 377 199 1025 405 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 200 0 905 62 0 725 278 0 0 169 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 0 1824 1774 0 1836 1692 0 0 1629 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.7 0.0 34.3 1.2 0.0 24.6 6.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.7 0.0 34.3 1.2 0.0 24.6 14.4 0.0 0.0 8.1 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.08 0.22 0.22 0.20 0.25 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 434 0 1117 296 0 1065 351 0 0 339 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.46 0.00 0.81 0.21 0.00 0.68 0.79 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 440 0 1117 320 0 1065 351 0 0 339 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(l) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 10.7 0.0 13.4 12.7 0.0 13.1 35.3 0.0 0.0 32.8 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.8 0.0 6.4 0.3 0.0 3.5 11.7 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile Back0fQ(50°/0),veh/In 2.1 0.0 19.1 0.6 0.0 13.3 8.0 0.0 0.0 3.9 0.0 0.0 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 11.5 0.0 19.8 13.1 0.0 16.6 47.0 0.0 0.0 33.9 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS B B B B D C Approach Vol, veh/h Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS 1105 18.3 B 787 16.4 B 278 47.0 D Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.8 60.9 22.0 9.7 58.0 22.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 7.0 6.0 4.0 7.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 53.0 16.0 6.0 51.0 16.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 3.2 36.3 10.1 5.7 26.6 16.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 9.5 1.2 0.0 11.8 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay HCM 2010 LOS 169 33.9 C 22.2 C Red Barn Subdivision 02/07/2018 Delich Associates Synchro 9 Light Report st pm.syn Timing Report, Sorted By Phase 9: SH66 & Colorado Short Total PM Existing Geometry Phase Number --00 1 f— t 1 2 4 5 6 8 Movement WBL EBTL SBTL EBL WBTL NBTL Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Max None None Max None Maximum Split (s) 8 60 22 10 58 22 Maximum Split (%) 8.9% 66.7% 24.4% 11.1% 64.4% 24.4% Minimum Split (s) 8 15 15 8 15 15 Yellow Time (s) 3 5 4 3 5 4 All -Red Time (s) 1 2 2 1 2 2 Minimum Initial (s) 3.5 5 5 3.5 5 5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 Minimum Gap (s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 Time Before Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Dual Entry No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Inhibit Max Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Start Time (s) 0 8 68 0 10 68 End Time (s) 8 68 0 10 68 0 Yield/Force Off (s) 4 61 84 6 61 84 Yield/Force Off 170(s) 4 61 84 6 61 84 Local Start Time (s) 80 88 58 80 0 58 Local Yield (s) 84 51 74 86 51 74 Local Yield 170(s) 84 51 74 86 51 74 Intersection Summary Cycle Length Control Type Natural Cycle 90 Actuated -Uncoordinated 80 Splits and Phases: 9: SH66 & Colorado ` 0 _ T_ IR 60 a7 J tt) 5 r t 06 06 10s Red Barn Subdivision 02/07/2018 Delich Associates Synchro 9 Light Report st pm.syn Queues Short Total PM 9: SH66 & Colorado Existing Geometry t ily Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 200 912 62 729 295 191 v/c Ratio 0.49 0.80 0.22 0.68 1.05 0.67 Control Delay 8.1 20.6 5.7 17.2 102.0 42.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 8.1 20.6 5.7 17.2 102.0 42.7 Queue Length 50th (ft) 30 372 9 265 —175 88 Queue Length 95th (ft) 50 555 18 387 #330 #175 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2644 2413 1876 2383 Turn Bay Length (ft) 450 450 Base Capacity (vph) 409 1134 278 1066 282 283 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.49 0.80 0.22 0.68 1.05 0.67 Intersection Summary - Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Red Barn Subdivision 02/07/2018 Synchro 9 Light Report Delich Associates st pm.syn HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 9: SH66 & Colorado Short Total AM NB & SB LT Lanes Movement Lane Configurations ' I 111 1 if T ) 1+ Traffic Volume (veh/h) 25 398 52 77 760 20 28 91 137 118 94 68 Future Volume (veh/h) 25 398 52 77 760 20 28 91 137 118 94 68 Number 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 18 7 4 14 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 27 433 49 84 826 21 30 99 59 128 102 31 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 277 852 96 530 976 25 269 223 133 246 280 85 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.52 0.50 0.06 0.54 0.52 0.19 0.20 0.19 0.19 0.20 0.19 Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 1644 186 1774 1809 46 1252 1095 653 1223 1372 417 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 27 0 482 84 0 847 30 0 158 128 0 133 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 0 1830 1774 0 1855 1252 0 1748 1223 0 1789 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.4 0.0 11.0 1.3 0.0 24.7 1.4 0.0 5.1 6.6 0.0 4.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.4 0.0 11.0 1.3 0.0 24.7 5.5 0.0 5.1 11.7 0.0 4.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.10 1.00 0.02 1.00 0.37 1.00 0.23 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 277 0 948 530 0 1001 269 0 357 246 0 365 V/C Ratio(X) 0.10 0.00 0.51 0.16 0.00 0.85 0.11 0.00 0.44 0.52 0.00 0.36 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 351 0 948 566 0 1001 269 0 357 246 0 365 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(l) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 10.9 0.0 10.1 7.0 0.0 12.4 25.0 0.0 22.4 28.3 0.0 21.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.0 1.9 0.1 0.0 8.8 0.2 0.0 0.9 1.9 0.0 0.6 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 0.2 0.0 6.0 0.7 0.0 14.9 0.5 0.0 2.5 2.3 0.0 2.1 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 11.0 0.0 12.0 7.1 0.0 21.2 25.2 0.0 23.2 30.2 0.0 22.5 LnGrp LOS B B A C C C C C Approach Vol, veh/h 509 931 188 261 Approach Delay, s/veh 12.0 20.0 23.5 26.3 Approach LOS B B C C ♦- t 4\ t P �► 1 4/ EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.7 39.0 18.0 5.3 40.4 18.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 7.0 6.0 4.0 7.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 32.0 12.0 4.0 32.0 12.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 3.3 13.0 13.7 2.4 26.7 7.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 8.0 0.0 0.0 3.4 0.9 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 19.0 HCM 2010 LOS B Red Barn Subdivision 02/07/2018 Delich Associates Synchro 9 Light Report st am nb-sb It.syn Timing Report, Sorted By Phase 9: SH66 & Colorado Short Total AM NB & SB LT Lanes Phase Number 1 1- r 1 2 4 5 6 8 Movement Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize Recall Mode Maximum Split (s) Maximum Split (%) Minimum Split (s) Yellow Time (s) All -Red Time (s) Minimum Initial (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Minimum Gap (s) Time Before Reduce (s Time To Reduce (s) Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Dual Entry Inhibit Max Start Time (s) End Time (s) Yield/Force Off (s) Yield/Force Off 170(s) Local Start Time (s) Local Yield (s) Local Yield 170(s) Intersection Summary Cycle Length Control Type Natural Cycle WBL EBTL SBTL EBL WBTL NBTL Lead Lag Lead Lag Yes Yes Yes Yes None Max None None Max None 8 39 18 8 39 18 12.3% 60.0% 27.7% 12.3% 60.0% 27.7% 8 15 15 8 15 15 3 5 4 3 5 4 1 2 2 1 2 2 3.5 5 5 3.5 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No Yes Yes Yes 0 8 8 47 4 40 4 40 57 0 61 32 61 32 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 47 0 8 0 8 47 59 4 40 59 4 40 39 57 0 51 61 32 51 61 32 65 Actuated -Uncoordinated 65 Splits and Phases: 9: SH66 & Colorado Yes Yes 47 0 59 59 39 51 51 131 �. _ r l I J 18s Red Barn Subdivision 02/07/2018 Delich Associates Synchro 9 Light Report st am nb-sb It.syn 9 1 Queues 9: SH66 & Colorado Short Total AM NB & SB LT Lanes Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 27 490 84 848 30 248 128 176 v/c Ratio 0.09 0.51 0.15 0.79 0.14 0.59 0.88 0.45 Control Delay 4.2 12.3 4.3 19.8 24.2 20.1 79.3 20.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 4.2 12.3 4.3 19.8 24.2 20.1 79.3 20.7 Queue Length 50th (ft) 3 116 9 195 10 50 50 43 Queue Length 95th (ft) 9 193 20 #522 31 117 #141 96 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2644 2413 1876 2383 Turn Bay Length (ft) 450 450 Base Capacity (vph) 308 969 558 1068 215 433 151 401 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.09 0.51 0.15 0.79 0.14 0.57 0.85 0.44 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Red Barn Subdivision 02/07/2018 Synchro 9 Light Report Delich Associates st am nb-sb It.syn HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Short Total PM 9: SH66 & Colorado NB & SB LT Lanes Movement c EBL EBT EBR WBL 4\ WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 11 1 11 1 11 1. 'I t Traffic Volume (veh/h) 178 708 103 55 592 57 55 137 70 29 84 57 Future Volume (veh/h) 178 708 103 55 592 57 55 137 70 29 84 57 Number 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 18 7 4 14 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 200 796 108 62 665 58 62 154 46 33 94 21 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 428 904 123 284 886 77 235 234 70 169 250 56 Arrive On Green 0.09 0.56 0.55 0.05 0.52 0.51 0.15 0.17 0.15 0.15 0.17 0.15 Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 1606 218 1774 1689 147 1272 1378 412 1178 1475 330 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 200 0 904 62 0 723 62 0 200 33 0 115 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 0 1824 1774 0 1837 1272 0 1790 1178 0 1805 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.0 0.0 27.9 1.0 0.0 20.0 3.0 0.0 6.8 1.8 0.0 3.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.0 0.0 27.9 1.0 0.0 20.0 6.7 0.0 6.8 8.6 0.0 3.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.08 1.00 0.23 1.00 0.18 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 428 0 1027 284 0 963 235 0 304 169 0 306 V/C Ratio(X) 0.47 0.00 0.88 0.22 0.00 0.75 0.26 0.00 0.66 0.19 0.00 0.38 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 432 0 1027 329 0 963 235 0 304 169 0 306 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(l) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 9.7 0.0 12.3 11.6 0.0 12.1 27.8 0.0 25.3 30.1 0.0 24.0 lncr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.8 0.0 10.8 0.4 0.0 5.4 0.6 0.0 5.1 0.6 0.0 0.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 1.7 0.0 16.9 0.5 0.0 11.5 1.1 0.0 3.8 0.6 0.0 1.9 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 10.5 0.0 23.1 11.9 0.0 17.5 28.4 0.0 30.4 30.7 0.0 24.7 LnGrp LOS B C B B C C C C Approach Vol, veh/h 1104 785 262 148 Approach Delay, s/veh 20.8 17.1 29.9 26.1 Approach LOS C B C C Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.4 42.5 16.0 8.9 40.0 16.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 7.0 6.0 4.0 7.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 34.0 10.0 5.0 33.0 10.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 3.0 29.9 10.6 5.0 22.0 8.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 3.1 0.0 0.0 7.1 0.3 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay HCM 2010 LOS 20.9 C Red Barn Subdivision 02/07/2018 Delich Associates Synchro 9 Light Report st pm nb-sb It.syn Timing Report, Sorted By Phase 9: SH66 & Colorado Short Total PM NB & SB LT Lanes Phase Number 1 2 1 4 5 t 6 8 Movement Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize Recall Mode Maximum Split (s) Maximum Split (%) Minimum Split (s) Yellow Time (s) All -Red Time (s) Minimum Initial (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Minimum Gap (s) Time Before Reduce (s) Time To Reduce (s) Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Dual Entry Inhibit Max Start Time (s) End Time (s) Yield/Force Off (s) Yield/Force Off 170(s) Local Start Time (s) Local Yield (s) Local Yield 170(s) Intersection Summary WBL Lead Yes None 8 12.3% 8 3 1 3.5 3 3 0 0 No Yes 0 8 4 4 56 60 60 EBTL Lag Yes Max 41 63.1% 15 5 2 5 3 3 0 0 Yes Yes 8 49 42 42 64 33 33 SBTL EBL Lead Yes None None 16 9 24.6% 13.8% 15 8 4 3 2 1 5 3.5 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 Yes No Yes Yes 49 0 0 9 59 5 59 5 40 56 50 61 50 61 WBTL NBTL Lag Yes Max None 40 16 61.5% 24.6% 15 15 5 4 2 2 5 5 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 49 49 0 42 59 42 59 0 40 33 50 33 50 Cycle Length Control Type Natural Cycle 65 Actuated -Uncoordinated 65 Splits and Phases: 9: SH66 & Colorado 101 —. , 4- 8Ls j 41s 16s . ../ 0 C 4— (---,6 9s I 44s Rif 16s a Red Barn Subdivision 02/07/2018 Delich Associates Synchro 9 Light Report st pm nb-sb It.syn Queues Short Total PM 9: SH66 & Colorado NB & SB LT Lanes 411 Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 200 912 62 729 62 233 33 158 v/c Ratio 0.50 0.84 0.21 0.75 0.36 0.74 0.29 0.49 Control Delay 7.7 21.8 4.8 18.1 31.1 37.8 31.5 23.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 7.7 21.8 4.8 18.1 31.1 37.8 31.5 23.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 20 297 6 206 22 75 12 40 Queue Length 95th (ft) 37 #548 14 332 54 #167 35 90 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2644 2413 1876 2383 Turn Bay Length (ft) 450 450 250 250 Base Capacity (vph) 402 1089 289 974 182 329 121 335 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.50 0.84 0.21 0.75 0.34 0.71 0.27 0.47 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Red Barn Subdivision 02/07/2018 Synchro 9 Light Report Delich Associates st pm nb-sb It.syn HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 9: SH66 & Colorado Short Total AM Required Geometry at P 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 'I + r 19 I, ?' 19 + r vl at, r Traffic Volume (veh/h) 25 398 52 77 760 20 28 91 137 118 94 68 Future Volume (veh/h) 25 398 52 77 760 20 28 91 137 118 94 68 Number 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 18 7 4 14 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 27 433 2 84 826 0 30 99 10 128 102 0 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 320 985 810 599 1029 847 259 318 243 260 318 243 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.53 0.51 0.06 0.55 0.00 0.15 0.17 0.15 0.15 0.17 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 1863 1583 1774 1863 1583 1287 1863 1583 1279 1863 1583 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 27 433 2 84 826 0 30 99 10 128 102 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1774 1863 1583 1774 1863 1583 1287 1863 1583 1279 1863 1583 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.4 8.4 0.0 1.2 20.9 0.0 1.3 2.7 0.3 5.8 2.8 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.4 8.4 0.0 1.2 20.9 0.0 4.1 2.7 0.3 8.5 2.8 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 320 985 810 599 1029 847 259 318 243 260 318 243 V/C Ratio(X) 0.08 0.44 0.00 0.14 0.80 0.00 0.12 0.31 0.04 0.49 0.32 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 403 985 810 641 1029 847 259 318 243 260 318 243 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(l) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 9.0 8.5 7.0 5.7 10.6 0.0 24.0 21.3 21.1 26.0 21.3 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 1.4 0.0 0.1 6.6 0.0 0.2 0.6 0.1 1.4 0.6 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 0.2 4.6 0.0 0.6 12.5 0.0 0.5 1.5 0.1 2.1 1.5 0.0 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 9.1 9.9 7.0 5.8 17.2 0.0 24.2 21.8 21.2 27.4 21.9 0.0 LnGrp LOS A A A A B CCCCC Approach Vol, veh/h 462 910 139 230 Approach Delay, s/veh 9.8 16.1 22.3 25.0 Approach LOS A B C C Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.6 37.0 15.0 5.2 38.4 15.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 7.0 6.0 4.0 7.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 30.0 9.0 4.0 30.0 9.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 3.2 10.4 10.5 2.4 22.9 6.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 7.5 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.4 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 16.1 HCM 2010 LOS B Red Barn Subdivision 02/07/2018 Synchro 9 Light Report Delich Associates st am required geo.syn Timing Report, Sorted By Phase 9: SH66 & Colorado Short Total AM Required Geometry Phase Number 1 2 4 5 6 8 Movement Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize Recall Mode Maximum Split (s) Maximum Split (13/0) Minimum Split (s) Yellow Time (s) All -Red Time (s) Minimum Initial (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Minimum Gap (s) Time Before Reduce (s) Time To Reduce (s) Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Dual Entry Inhibit Max Start Time (s) End Time (s) Yield/Force Off (s) Yield/Force Off 170(s) Local Start Time (s) Local Yield (s) Local Yield 170(s) Intersection Summary Cycle Length Control Type Natural Cycle WBL Lead Yes None 8 13.3% 8 3 1 3.5 3 3 0 0 No Yes 0 8 4 4 52 56 56 EBTL Lag Yes Max 37 61.7% 15 5 2 5 3 3 0 0 Yes Yes 8 45 38 38 0 30 30 SBTL EBL Lead Yes None None 15 8 25.0% 13.3% 15 8 4 3 2 1 5 3.5 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 Yes No Yes Yes 45 0 0 8 54 4 54 4 37 52 46 56 46 56 60 Actuated -Uncoordinated 60 Splits and Phases: 9: SH66 & Colorado WBTL NBTL Lag Yes Max None 37 15 61.7% 25.0% 15 15 5 4 2 2 5 5 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 45 45 0 38 54 38 54 0 37 30 46 30 46 lea 1 alpir -1 37s I 15s f 05 4---� o6 ;_ 37 s 15 s Red Barn Subdivision 02/07/2018 Delich Associates Synchro 9 Light Report st am required geo.syn Queues Short Total AM 9: SH66 & Colorado Required Geometry Lane Group Lane Group Flow (vph) 27 433 57 84 826 22 30 99 149 128 102 74 v/c Ratio 0.07 0.38 0.06 0.12 0.67 0.02 0.16 0.34 0.42 0.68 0.34 0.21 Control Delay 3.2 9.7 0.2 3.3 14.0 0.1 24.7 25.7 9.1 45.7 25.6 2.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 3.2 9.7 0.2 3.3 14.0 0.1 24.7 25.7 9.1 45.7 25.6 2.1 Queue Length 50th (ft) 2 90 0 7 155 0 10 32 0 44 33 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 7 152 2 17 #461 0 30 70 43 #115 72 7 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2644 2413 1876 2383 Turn Bay Length (ft) 450 300 450 300 250 250 250 250 Base Capacity (vph) 410 1142 1001 702 1241 1078 199 320 371 199 320 367 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.07 0.38 0.06 0.12 0.67 0.02 0.15 0.31 0.40 0.64 0.32 0.20 4— '. 4 P ■ 4/ EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Red Barn Subdivision 02/07/2018 Synchro 9 Light Report Delich Associates st am required geo.syn HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Short Total PM 9: SH66 & Colorado Required Geometry Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations I + r vi + rij + r if + % Traffic Volume (veh/h) 178 708 103 55 592 57 55 137 70 29 84 57 Future Volume (veh/h) 178 708 103 55 592 57 55 137 70 29 84 57 Number 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 18 7 4 14 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 200 796 63 62 665 7 62 154 0 33 94 0 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 470 1031 850 360 976 803 242 289 219 198 289 219 Arrive On Green 0.08 0.55 0.54 0.05 0.52 0.51 0.14 0.15 0.00 0.14 0.15 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 1863 1583 1774 1863 1583 1297 1863 1583 1228 1863 1583 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 200 796 63 62 665 7 62 154 0 33 94 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 1863 1583 1774 1863 1583 1297 1863 1583 1228 1863 1583 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.8 19.7 1.1 0.9 15.6 0.1 2.7 4.5 0.0 1.5 2.7 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.8 19.7 1.1 0.9 15.6 0.1 5.4 4.5 0.0 6.0 2.7 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 470 1031 850 360 976 803 242 289 219 198 289 219 V/C Ratio(X) 0.43 0.77 0.07 0.17 0.68 0.01 0.26 0.53 0.00 0.17 0.33 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 470 1031 850 413 976 803 261 315 241 215 315 241 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 7.9 10.3 6.6 8.5 10.4 7.2 25.6 23.0 0.0 26.8 22.2 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.6 5.6 0.2 0.2 3.8 0.0 0.6 1.5 0.0 0.4 0.6 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 1.4 11.6 0.5 0.4 9.0 0.1 1.0 2.4 0.0 0.5 1.4 0.0 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 8.5 15.9 6.8 8.7 14.3 7.2 26.1 24.6 0.0 27.1 22.9 0.0 LnGrp LOS A B A A B A CC C C Approach Vol, veh/h 1059 734 216 127 Approach Delay, s/veh 13.9 13.7 25.0 24.0 Approach LOS B B C C Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.2 38.8 14.2 8.0 37.0 14.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 7.0 6.0 4.0 7.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 30.0 9.0 4.0 30.0 9.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.9 21.7 8.0 4.8 17.6 7.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 5.2 0.2 0.0 7.0 0.3 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 15.6 HCM 2010 LOS B Red Barn Subdivision 02/07/2018 Synchro 9 Light Report Delich Associates st pm required geo.syn Timing Report, Sorted By Phase 9: SH66 & Colorado Short Total PM Required Geometry Phase Number 1 1 2 4 5 4-- t 6 8 Movement Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize Recall Mode Maximum Split (s) Maximum Split (°/0) Minimum Split (s) Yellow Time (s) All -Red Time (s) Minimum Initial (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Minimum Gap (s) Time Before Reduce (s) Time To Reduce (s) Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Dual Entry Inhibit Max Start Time (s) End Time (s) Yield/Force Off (s) Yield/Force Off 170(s) Local Start Time (s) Local Yield (s) Local Yield 170(s) Intersection Summary WBL Lead Yes None 8 13.3% 8 3 1 3.5 3 3 0 0 No Yes 0 8 4 4 52 56 56 EBTL Lag Yes Max 37 61.7% 15 5 2 5 3 3 0 0 Yes Yes 8 45 38 38 0 30 30 SBTL EBL Lead Yes None None 15 8 25.0% 13.3% 15 8 4 3 2 1 5 3.5 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 Yes No Yes Yes 45 0 0 8 54 4 54 4 37 52 46 56 46 56 WBTL NBTL Lag Yes Max None 37 15 61.7% 25.0% 15 15 5 4 2 2 5 5 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 45 45 0 38 54 38 54 0 37 30 46 30 46 Cycle Length Control Type Natural Cycle 60 Actuated -Uncoordinated 60 Splits and Phases: 9: SH66 & Colorado 01 at 04 SsI 37s 1 ��c J I +38 3s 37s I -55 1 - I _. Red Barn Subdivision 02/07/2018 Delich Associates Synchro 9 Light Report st pm required geo.syn Queues Short Total PM 9: SH66 & Colorado Required Geometry Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 200 796 116 62 665 64 62 154 79 33 94 64 v/c Ratio 0.40 0.67 0.11 0.15 0.58 0.06 0.32 0.49 0.22 0.18 0.30 0.18 Control Delay 5.5 14.9 2.0 3.7 12.8 0.5 27.7 28.7 2.6 25.1 25.0 1.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 5.5 14.9 2.0 3.7 12.8 0.5 27.7 28.7 2.6 25.1 25.0 1.1 Queue Length 50th (ft) 19 223 0 5 165 0 20 51 0 11 30 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 35 #426 17 13 270 4 51 100 8 32 66 1 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2644 2413 1876 2383 Turn Bay Length (ft) 450 300 450 300 250 250 250 250 Base Capacity (vph) 503 1194 1041 419 1144 1001 218 349 387 207 349 387 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.40 0.67 0.11 0.15 0.58 0.06 0.28 0.44 0.20 0.16 0.27 0.17 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Red Barn Subdivision 02/07/2018 Synchro 9 Light Report Delich Associates st pm required geo.syn HCM 2010 TWSC Short Total AM 12: Colorado & Red Barn Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.5 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations 'fi Traffic Vol, veh/h 27 59 21 117 Future Vol, veh/h 27 59 21 117 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free RT Channelized None None Storage Length 0 250 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 29 64 23 127 Major/Minor Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 393 220 224 0 0 Stage 1 220 Stage 2 173 Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 611 820 1345 Stage 1 817 Stage 2 857 Platoon blocked, Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 601 820 1345 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 601 Stage 1 817 Stage 2 842 1+ 198 8 198 8 0 0 Free Free - None 0 0 92 92 2 2 215 9 Major1 Major2 Approach HCM Control Delay, s 10.6 HCM LOS B EB NB 1.2 Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1345 - 736 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.017 - 0.127 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.7 - 10.6 HCM Lane LOS A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 0.4 SB 0 Red Barn Subdivision 02/07/2018 Synchro 9 Light Report Delich Associates st am.syn HCM 2010 TWSC Short Total PM 12: Colorado & Red Barn Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT Lane Configurations li + Traffic Vol, veh/h 17 39 67 282 Future Vol, veh/h 17 39 67 282 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free RT Channelized None - None Storage Length 0 250 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 86 86 86 86 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 20 45 78 328 SBT SBR 126 30 126 30 0 0 Free Free - None 0 0 86 86 2 2 147 35 Major/Minor Minor2 Major/ Major2 Conflicting Flow All 648 164 181 0 0 Stage 1 164 Stage 2 484 Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 435 881 1394 Stage 1 865 Stage 2 620 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 411 881 1394 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 411 Stage 1 865 Stage 2 585 Approach HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS EB NB 11.1 B 1.5 Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) SB 0 1394 - 654 0.056 - 0.1 7.7 - 11.1 A - B 0.2 - 0.3 Red Barn Subdivision 02/07/2018 Synchro 9 Light Report Delich Associates st pm.syn HCM 2010 TWSC Short Total AM 6: Colorado/WCR13 & WCR32 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4. 4 I t 4+ Traffic Vol, veh/h 7 2 10 1 1 0 15 128 1 2 195 47 Future Vol, veh/h 7 2 10 1 1 0 15 128 1 2 195 47 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None - None Storage Length 250 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 0 Grade, % - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 8 2 11 1 1 0 16 139 1 2 212 51 Major/Minor Conflicting Flow All 415 415 238 420 439 140 263 0 0 140 0 0 Stage 1 242 242 172 172 Stage 2 173 173 - 248 267 - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 548 528 801 544 512 908 1301 1443 Stage 1 762 705 830 756 - Stage 2 829 756 756 688 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 541 520 801 529 505 908 1301 1443 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 541 520 529 505 Stage 1 753 704 820 747 Stage 2 818 747 742 687 Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Approach HCM Control Delay, s 10.7 HCM LOS EB WB NB SB 12 B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1301 - - 649 517 1443 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.013 - 0.032 0.004 0.002 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.8 - 10.7 12 7.5 0 HCM Lane LOS A - B B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.1 0 0 0.8 0.1 Red Barn Subdivision 02/07/2018 Synchro 9 Light Report Delich Associates st am.syn HCM 2010 TWSC Short Total PM 6: Colorado/WCR13 & WCR32 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 4 Ili t 4 Traffic Vol, veh/h 69 6 20 3 5 1 12 286 1 1 133 9 Future Vol, veh/h 69 6 20 3 5 1 12 286 1 1 133 9 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - - None None Storage Length - - 250 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 0 Grade, % - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 80 7 23 3 6 1 14 333 1 1 155 10 Major/Minor Minor2 Minorl Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 527 524 160 538 528 333 165 0 0 334 0 0 Stage 1 162 162 361 361 Stage 2 365 362 - 177 167 - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 462 458 885 454 456 709 1413 1225 Stage 1 840 764 657 626 Stage 2 654 625 825 760 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 453 453 885 433 451 709 1413 1225 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 453 453 433 451 Stage 1 832 763 650 620 Stage 2 640 619 795 759 - Approach HCM Control Delay, s 14.1 HCM LOS EB WB NB SB 13 B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1413 - - 505 463 1225 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.01 - 0.219 0.023 0.001 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.6 - 14.1 13 7.9 0 HCM Lane LOS A - BB A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.8 0.1 0 - 0.3 0.1 Red Barn Subdivision 02/07/2018 Synchro 9 Light Report Delich Associates st pm.syn HCM 2010 TWSC Short Total AM 6: Colorado/WCR13 & WCR32 Required Geometry Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 4 11 t 4 i' Traffic Vol, veh/h 7 2 10 1 1 0 15 128 1 2 195 47 Future Vol, veh/h 7 2 10 1 1 0 15 128 1 2 195 47 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - - None - None Storage Length - - - 250 - 250 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 0 Grade, % - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 8 2 11 1 1 0 16 139 1 2 212 51 Major/Minor Conflicting Flow All 389 389 212 395 388 140 212 0 0 140 0 0 Stage 1 216 216 172 172 Stage 2 173 173 - 223 216 - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 570 546 828 565 547 908 1358 1443 Stage 1 786 724 830 756 Stage 2 829 756 780 724 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 563 538 828 550 539 908 1358 1443 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 563 538 550 539 Stage 1 777 723 820 747 Stage 2 818 747 766 723 Minor2 Minor1 Major/ Major2 Approach HCM Control Delay, s 10.5 HCM LOS EB WB NB SB 11.6 0.8 0.1 B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1358 - - 673 544 1443 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.012 - 0.031 0.004 0.002 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.7 - 10.5 11.6 7.5 0 HCM Lane LOS A - BB A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.1 0 0 Red Barn Subdivision 02/07/2018 Synchro 9 Light Report Delich Associates st am required geo.syn HCM 2010 TWSC Short Total PM 6: Colorado/WCR13 & WCR32 Required Geometry Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4+ 4+ 11 1. 4 r Traffic Vol, veh/h 69 6 20 3 5 1 12 286 1 1 133 9 Future Vol, veh/h 69 6 20 3 5 1 12 286 1 1 133 9 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None - None Storage Length - 250 - 250 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 0 Grade, % - 0 - 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 80 7 23 3 6 1 14 333 1 1 155 10 Major/Minor Minor2 Minorl Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 522 519 155 533 518 333 155 0 0 334 0 0 Stage 1 157 157 361 361 Stage 2 365 362 - 172 157 - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 465 461 891 458 462 709 1425 1225 Stage 1 845 768 657 626 - Stage 2 654 625 830 768 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 456 456 891 437 457 709 1425 1225 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 456 456 437 457 Stage 1 837 767 651 620 Stage 2 640 619 - 800 767 Approach EB HCM Control Delay, s 14 HCM LOS B WB NB SB 12.9 0.3 0.1 B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1425 - - 508 468 1225 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.01 - 0.217 0.022 0.001 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.6 - 14 12.9 7.9 0 HCM Lane LOS A - B B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.8 0.1 0 - Red Barn Subdivision 02/07/2018 Synchro 9 Light Report Delich Associates st pm required geo.syn HCM 2010 TWSC Short Total AM 14: Driveway (Barnyard) & WCR32 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.4 Movement Lane Configurations I'D 4 V' Traffic Vol, veh/h 17 0 1 62 1 2 Future Vol, veh/h 17 0 1 62 1 2 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 85 85 85 85 85 85 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 20 0 1 73 1 2 EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap -1 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver Mov Cap -2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS 0 0 20 0 EB 0 4.12 2.218 1596 1596 WB 0.1 Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 1001 - - 1596 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.004 - 0.001 HCM Control Delay (s) 8.6 - 7.3 0 HCM Lane LOS A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - 95 20 20 75 6.42 6.22 5.42 5.42 3.518 3.318 905 1058 1003 948 904 1058 904 1003 947 NB 8.6 A Red Barn Subdivision 02/07/2018 Synchro 9 Light Report Delich Associates st am.syn HCM 2010 TWSC Short Total PM 14: Driveway (Barnyard) & WCR32 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.3 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations ', 4 i Traffic Vol, veh/h 93 1 2 24 0 2 Future Vol, veh/h 93 1 2 24 0 2 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None - None None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 85 85 85 85 85 85 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 109 1 2 28 0 2 Major/Minor Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap -1 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver Mov Cap -2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Major/ Major2 0 0 111 0 4.12 2.218 1479 EB 0 1479 WB 0.6 Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 943 - - 1479 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 - 0.002 HCM Control Delay (s) 8.8 - 7.4 0 HCM Lane LOS A - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - Minor/ 143 110 110 33 6.42 6.22 5.42 5.42 3.518 3.318 850 943 915 989 849 943 849 915 988 NB 8.8 A Red Barn Subdivision 02/07/2018 Synchro 9 Light Report Delich Associates st pm.syn HCM 2010 TWSC Short Total AM 3: East Frontage Road & WCR32 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4+ 4+ 4+ 4+ Traffic Vol, veh/h 6 19 11 2 18 20 3 19 1 28 83 3 Future Vol, veh/h 6 19 11 2 18 20 3 19 1 28 83 3 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None - None Storage Length - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 0 Grade, % - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 7 22 13 2 21 24 4 22 1 33 98 4 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor/ Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 217 196 99 213 197 23 101 0 0 24 0 0 Stage 1 165 165 30 30 Stage 2 52 31 - 183 167 - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 739 699 957 744 699 1054 1491 - 1591 Stage 1 837 762 987 870 - Stage 2 961 869 819 760 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 692 682 957 702 682 1054 1491 1591 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 692 682 702 682 - Stage 1 834 745 984 867 . Stage 2 914 866 766 743 Approach HCM Control Delay, s 10.1 HCM LOS EB WB 9.6 B A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1491 - - 750 830 1591 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 - 0.056 0.057 0.021 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.4 0 - 10.1 9.6 7.3 0 HCM Lane LOS A A - B A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.2 0.2 0.1 - NB 1 SB 1.8 Red Barn Subdivision 02/07/2018 Synchro 9 Light Report Delich Associates st am.syn HCM 2010 TWSC Short Total PM 3: East Frontage Road & WCR32 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4+ 4+ 4+ 4+ Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 10 10 0 20 30 27 118 1 23 30 4 Future Vol, veh/h 3 10 10 0 20 30 27 118 1 23 30 4 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 0 Grade, % - 0 - 0 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 4 12 12 0 24 35 32 139 1 27 35 5 Major/Minor Minor2 Minorl Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 324 296 38 307 297 139 40 0 0 140 0 0 Stage 1 92 92 203 203 Stage 2 232 204 - 104 94 - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 629 616 1034 645 615 909 1570 1443 Stage 1 915 819 - 799 733 Stage 2 771 733 902 817 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 568 591 1034 609 590 909 1570 1443 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 568 591 609 590 Stage 1 895 803 7.81 717 Stage 2 701 717 862 801 - Approach EB HCM Control Delay, s 10.2 HCM LOS WB NB 10.2 1.4 B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1570 - - 722 747 1443 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.02 - 0.037 0.079 0.019 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.3 0 - 10.2 10.2 7.5 0 HCM Lane LOS AA - B B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0.1 0.3 0.1 SB 3 Red Barn Subdivision 02/07/2018 Synchro 9 Light Report Delich Associates st pm.syn HCM 2010 TWSC 3: East Frontage Road & WCR32 Short Total AM Required Geometry Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4+ 4+ III I iPj Traffic Vol, veh/h 6 19 11 2 18 20 3 19 1 28 83 3 Future Vol, veh/h 6 19 11 2 18 20 3 19 1 28 83 3 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None - None Storage Length - 250 250 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 0 Grade, % - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 7 22 13 2 21 24 4 22 1 33 98 4 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor/ Major/ Major2 Conflicting Flow All 217 196 99 213 197 23 101 0 0 24 0 0 Stage 1 165 165 30 30 Stage 2 52 31 - 183 167 - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 739 699 957 744 699 1054 1491 1591 Stage 1 837 762 987 870 - Stage 2 961 869 819 760 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 693 683 957 703 683 1054 1491 1591 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 693 683 703 683 - Stage 1 835 746 984 868 Stage 2 914 867 767 744 Approach HCM Control Delay, s 10.1 HCM LOS EB WB 9.6 B A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1491 - - 750 830 1591 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 - - 0.056 0.057 0.021 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.4 - 10.1 9.6 7.3 HCM Lane LOS A - B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.2 0.2 0.1 NB 1 SB 1.8 Red Barn Subdivision 02/07/2018 Synchro 9 Light Report Delich Associates st am required geo.syn HCM 2010 TWSC Short Total PM 3: East Frontage Road & WCR32 Required Geometry Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4+ 4+ 11 Ti ) Ti Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 10 10 0 20 30 27 118 1 23 30 4 Future Vol, veh/h 3 10 10 0 20 30 27 118 1 23 30 4 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - - None - None Storage Length 250 250 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 0 Grade, % - 0 0 - - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 4 12 12 0 24 35 32 139 1 27 35 5 Major/Minor Minor2 Minorl Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 324 296 38 307 297 139 40 0 0 140 0 0 Stage 1 92 92 203 203 Stage 2 232 204 - 104 94 - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 629 616 1034 645 615 909 1570 1443 Stage 1 915 819 - 799 733 Stage 2 771 733 902 817 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 569 592 1034 609 591 909 1570 1443 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 569 592 609 591 Stage 1 896 804 783 718 Stage 2 702 718 862 802 Approach EB HCM Control Delay, s 10.2 HCM LOS WB NB 10.2 1.4 B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1570 - - 722 748 1443 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.02 - - 0.037 0.079 0.019 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.3 - - 10.2 10.2 7.5 HCM Lane LOS A - - B B A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0.1 0.3 0.1 SB 3 Red Barn Subdivision 02/07/2018 Synchro 9 Light Report Delich Associates st pm required geo.syn APPENDIX H HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Long Total AM 9: SH66 & Colorado Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ) ft r " ++ r vi 4, r ) 44 ? Traffic Volume (veh/h) 50 575 75 110 1105 60 35 150 200 255 195 140 Future Volume (veh/h) 50 575 75 110 1105 60 35 150 200 255 195 140 Number 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 18 7 4 14 Initial 0 (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 53 605 0 116 1163 0 37 158 18 268 205 0 Adj No. of Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 276 1357 607 472 1448 648 322 256 218 381 361 307 Arrive On Green 0.05 0.38 0.00 0.08 0.41 0.00 0.05 0.14 0.14 0.10 0.19 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 3539 1583 1774 3539 1583 1774 1863 1583 1774 1863 1583 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 53 605 0 116 1163 0 37 158 18 268 205 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 1770 1583 1774 1770 1583 1774 1863 1583 1774 1863 1583 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.0 7.3 0.0 2.1 16.6 0.0 1.0 4.6 0.6 6.0 5.7 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.0 7.3 0.0 2.1 16.6 0.0 1.0 4.6 0.6 6.0 5.7 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 276 1357 607 472 1448 648 322 256 218 381 361 307 V/C Ratio(X) 0.19 0.45 0.00 0.25 0.80 0.00 0.11 0.62 0.08 0.70 0.57 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 338 1357 607 488 1448 648 390 325 276 381 361 307 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 11.7 13.2 0.0 9.2 14.9 0.0 19.5 23.3 21.6 19.3 21.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 1.1 0.0 0.3 4.8 0.0 0.2 2.4 0.2 5.8 2.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 0.5 3.7 0.0 1.0 9.0 0.0 0.5 2.5 0.3 1.9 3.1 0.0 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 12.0 14.2 0.0 9.5 19.7 0.0 19.6 25.7 21.7 25.1 23.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS B B A B BCCCC Approach Vol, veh/h 658 1279 213 473 Approach Delay, s/veh 14.0 18.8 24.3 24.2 Approach LOS B B C C Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.5 28.0 5.8 16.1 6.0 29.5 9.0 12.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 7.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 7.0 4.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 21.0 4.0 10.0 4.0 21.0 5.0 9.0 Max 0 Clear Time (g_c+11), s 4.1 9.3 3.0 7.7 3.0 18.6 8.0 6.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 7.7 0.0 0.4 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.3 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 19.0 HCM 2010 LOS B Red Barn Subdivision 02/08/2018 Delich Associates Synchro 9 Light Report It am.syn Timing Report, Sorted By Phase 9: SH66 & Colorado Long Total AM Phase Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 r 7 8 Movement Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize Recall Mode Maximum Split (s) Maximum Split (%) Minimum Split (s) Yellow Time (s) All -Red Time (s) Minimum Initial (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Minimum Gap (s) Time Before Reduce (s) Time To Reduce (s) Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Dual Entry Inhibit Max Start Time (s) End Time (s) Yield/Force Off (s) Yield/Force Off 170(s) Local Start Time (s) Local Yield (s) Local Yield 170(s) Intersection Summary WBL Lead Yes None 8 13.3% 8 3 1 3.5 3 3 0 0 No Yes 0 8 4 4 52 56 56 EBTL Lag Yes Max 28 46.7% 15 5 2 5 3 3 0 0 NBL Lead Yes None 8 13.3% 8 3 1 4 3 3 0 0 SBTL Lag Yes None 16 26.7% 15 4 2 5 3 3 0 0 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 36 44 36 44 0 29 40 54 29 40 54 0 28 36 21 32 46 21 32 46 EBL Lead Yes None 8 13.3% 8 3 1 3.5 3 3 0 0 WBTL Lag Yes Max 28 46.7% 15 5 2 5 3 3 0 0 SBL Lead Yes None 9 15.0% 8 3 1 4 3 3 0 0 NBTL Lag Yes None 15 25.0% 15 4 2 5 3 3 0 0 No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 0 8 36 45 8 36 45 0 4 29 41 54 4 29 41 54 52 0 28 37 56 21 33 46 56 21 33 46 Cycle Length Control Type Natural Cycle 60 Actuated -Uncoordinated 60 Splits and Phases: 9: SH66 & Colorado J L• 3 s 28 s 8 s 10 s Jr -\Pit—, - - - 1� 5 :� .28 s 9 s 15 s n = r V: Red Barn Subdivision 02/08/2018 Delich Associates Synchro 9 Light Report It am.syn Queues Long Total AM 9: SH66 & Colorado Lane Group Lane Group Flow (vph) 53 605 79 116 1163 63 37 158 211 268 205 147 v/c Ratio 0.18 0.45 0.11 0.26 0.80 0.08 0.10 0.52 0.48 0.65 0.41 0.25 Control Delay 7.9 15.3 0.3 8.2 22.2 0.2 13.8 29.8 7.9 25.0 23.2 2.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 7.9 15.3 0.3 8.2 22.2 0.2 13.8 29.8 7.9 25.0 23.2 2.5 Queue Length 50th (ft) 8 85 0 18 203 0 9 53 0 73 56 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 21 125 0 38 #323 0 25 103 46 #149 #131 16 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2644 2413 1876 2403 Turn Bay Length (ft) 450 400 450 400 250 250 250 250 Base Capacity(vph) 289 1355 729 444 1450 766 384 324 455 415 494 580 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.18 0.45 0.11 0.26 0.80 0.08 0.10 0.49 0.46 0.65 0.41 0.25 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Red Barn Subdivision 02/08/2018 Synchro 9 Light Report Delich Associates It am.syn HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Long Total PM 9: SH66 & Colorado 4- 4\ t Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1Pi 4444 j' ' ++ P '9 I, r vi + P Traffic Volume (veh/h) 300 1020 150 80 860 180 80 260 110 95 165 110 Future Volume (veh/h) 300 1020 150 80 860 180 80 260 110 95 165 110 Number 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 18 7 4 14 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 316 1074 32 84 905 44 84 274 0 100 174 0 Adj No. of Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 401 1324 592 290 1078 482 391 360 306 322 378 321 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.37 0.37 0.07 0.30 0.30 0.07 0.19 0.00 0.08 0.20 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 3539 1583 1774 3539 1583 1774 1863 1583 1774 1863 1583 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 316 1074 32 84 905 44 84 274 0 100 174 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 1770 1583 1774 1770 1583 1774 1863 1583 1774 1863 1583 Q Serve(g_s), s 6.7 16.1 0.8 1.9 14.1 1.2 2.2 8.2 0.0 2.6 4.9 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.7 16.1 0.8 1.9 14.1 1.2 2.2 8.2 0.0 2.6 4.9 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 401 1324 592 290 1078 482 391 360 306 322 378 321 V/C Ratio(X) 0.79 0.81 0.05 0.29 0.84 0.09 0.21 0.76 0.00 0.31 0.46 0.00 AvailCap(c_a),veh/h 401 1324 592 323 1078 482 417 378 321 331 378 321 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(l) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 13.1 16.6 11.8 13.8 19.2 14.7 17.0 22.6 0.0 17.2 20.7 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 10.2 5.5 0.2 0.5 7.9 0.4 0.3 8.4 0.0 0.5 0.9 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 4.3 8.8 0.4 0.9 8.1 0.6 1.1 5.0 0.0 1.3 2.6 0.0 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 23.3 22.1 12.0 14.3 27.1 15.1 17.3 30.9 0.0 17.7 21.6 0.0 LnGrp LOS C C B B C B B C B C Approach Vol, veh/h 1422 1033 358 274 Approach Delay, s/veh 22.1 25.5 27.7 20.2 Approach LOS C C C C Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.9 28.1 7.1 17.0 11.0 24.0 7.7 16.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 7.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 7.0 4.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 20.0 4.0 11.0 7.0 17.0 4.0 11.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 3.9 18.1 4.2 6.9 8.7 16.1 4.6 10.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.2 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 23.7 HCM 2010 LOS C Red Barn Subdivision 02/08/2018 Synchro 9 Light Report Delich Associates It pm.syn Timing Report, Sorted By Phase 9: SH66 & Colorado Long Total PM Phase Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Movement Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize Recall Mode Maximum Split (s) Maximum Split (%) Minimum Split (s) Yellow Time (s) All -Red Time (s) Minimum Initial (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Minimum Gap (s) Time Before Reduce (s) Time To Reduce (s) Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Dual Entry Inhibit Max Start Time (s) End Time (s) Yield/Force Off (s) Yield/Force Off 170(s) Local Start Time (s) Local Yield (s) Local Yield 170(s) Intersection Summary Cycle Length Control Type Natural Cycle WBL Lead Yes None 8 13.3% 8 3 1 3.5 3 3 0 0 EBTL NBL Lag Lead Yes Yes Max None 27 8 45.0% 13.3% 15 8 5 3 2 1 5 4 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 No Yes Yes Yes 0 8 8 35 4 28 4 28 49 57 53 17 53 17 SBTL Lag Yes None 17 28.3% 15 4 2 5 3 3 0 0 No Yes Yes Yes 35 43 43 0 39 54 39 54 24 32 28 43 28 43 60 Actuated -Uncoordinated 60 Splits and Phases: 9: SH66 & Colorado col a. ''-! - --. 7 ir 'LI -". 8s .27s 'Cs ± 17s .-fr .,._ .._, \ID...-, - t .vi 1.1s 24s 8s R117s EBL Lead Yes None 11 18.3% 8 3 1 3.5 3 3 0 0 No Yes 0 11 7 7 49 56 56 WBTL Lag Yes Max 24 40.0% 15 5 2 5 3 3 0 0 Yes Yes 11 35 28 28 0 17 17 SBL Lead Yes None 8 13.30/0 8 3 1 4 3 3 0 0 NBTL Lag Yes None 17 28.3% 15 4 2 5 3 3 0 0 No Yes Yes Yes 35 43 43 0 39 54 39 54 24 32 28 43 28 43 Red Barn Subdivision 02/08/2018 Delich Associates Synchro 9 Light Report It pm.syn Queues Long Total PM 9: SH66 & Colorado Lane Group Lane Group Flow(vph) 316 1074 158 84 905 189 84 274 116 100 174 116 v/c Ratio 0.82 0.77 0.21 0.28 0.82 0.30 0.21 0.74 0.24 0.32 0.47 0.24 Control Delay 30.7 22.1 2.2 9.9 27.2 4.1 14.2 37.0 1.3 15.9 25.9 1.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 30.7 22.1 2.2 9.9 27.2 4.1 14.2 37.0 1.3 15.9 25.9 1.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 59 185 0 13 160 0 20 94 0 24 56 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) #183 #296 21 31 #257 35 45 #195 3 51 108 3 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2644 2413 1876 2403 Turn Bay Length (ft) 450 400 450 400 250 250 250 250 Base Capacity(vph) 385 1403 748 295 1105 631 407 387 502 313 387 502 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.82 0.77 0.21 0.28 0.82 0.30 0.21 0.71 0.23 0.32 0.45 0.23 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Red Barn Subdivision 02/08/2018 Synchro 9 Light Report Delich Associates It pm.syn HCM 2010 TWSC Long Total AM 12: Colorado & Red Barn Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.1 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT Lane Configurations Ire li + Traffic Vol, veh/h 15 95 30 235 Future Vol, veh/h 15 95 30 235 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free RT Channelized None None Storage Length 0 250 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 16 100 32 247 SBT SBR 470 5 470 5 0 0 Free Free None 0 0 95 95 2 2 495 5 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 808 497 500 0 0 Stage 1 497 Stage 2 311 Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 350 573 1064 Stage 1 611 Stage 2 743 - - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 339 573 1064 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 339 Stage 1 611 Stage 2 721 - Approach EB HCM Control Delay, s 13.8 HCM LOS B NB 1 Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1064 - 524 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.03 - 0.221 HCM Control Delay (s) 8.5 - 13.8 HCM Lane LOS A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 0.8 SB 0 Red Barn Subdivision 02/08/2018 Synchro 9 Light Report Delich Associates It am.syn HCM 2010 TWSC Long Total PM 12: Colorado & Red Barn Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 1.6 EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations 'I + Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 60 105 615 Future Vol, veh/h 10 60 105 615 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free RT Channelized None None Storage Length 0 250 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 11 63 111 647 Major/Minor Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1194 326 337 0 0 Stage 1 326 Stage 2 868 Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 206 715 1222 Stage 1 731 - Stage 2 411 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 187 715 1222 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 187 Stage 1 731 Stage 2 374 300 20 300 20 0 0 Free Free - None 0 0 95 95 2 2 316 21 Major1 Major2 Approach HCM Control Delay, s 13.3 HCM LOS B EB NB 1.2 Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1222 - 509 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.09 - 0.145 HCM Control Delay (s) 8.2 - 13.3 HCM Lane LOS A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 - 0.5 SB 0 Red Barn Subdivision 02/08/2018 Synchro 9 Light Report Delich Associates It pm.syn HCM 2010 TWSC Long Total AM 14: Colorado & Barnyard Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.5 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT Lane Configurations Ire 11 Traffic Vol, veh/h 20 55 20 230 Future Vol, veh/h 20 55 20 230 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free RT Channelized None - None Storage Length 0 - 250 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 21 58 21 242 SBT SBR 1+ 420 5 420 5 0 0 Free Free - None 0 0 95 95 2 2 442 5 Major/Minor Minor2 Major/ Major2 Conflicting Flow All 729 445 447 0 0 Stage 1 445 Stage 2 284 Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 390 613 1113 Stage 1 646 Stage 2 764 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 383 613 1113 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 383 Stage 1 646 Stage 2 750 Approach EB HCM Control Delay, s 13 HCM LOS B NB 0.7 Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1113 528 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.019 0.15 HCM Control Delay (s) 8.3 13 HCM Lane LOS A B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.5 SB 0 Red Barn Subdivision 02/08/2018 Delich Associates Synchro 9 Light Report It am.syn HCM 2010 TWSC Long Total PM 14: Colorado & Barnyard Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 1.2 EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations ►I Traffic Vol, veh/h 15 35 60 565 Future Vol, veh/h 15 35 60 565 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free RT Channelized None - None Storage Length 0 250 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 16 37 63 595 Major/Minor Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1034 313 326 0 - 0 Stage 1 313 Stage 2 721 Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 257 727 1234 Stage 1 741 Stage 2 482 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 244 727 1234 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 244 Stage 1 741 Stage 2 457 285 25 285 25 0 0 Free Free - None 0 0 - 95 95 2 2 300 26 Major/ Major2 Approach HCM Control Delay, s 13.9 HCM LOS B EB NB 0.8 Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1234 - 456 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.051 - 0.115 HCM Control Delay (s) 8.1 - 13.9 HCM Lane LOS A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - 0.4 SB 0 Red Barn Subdivision 02/08/2018 Synchro 9 Light Report Delich Associates It pm.syn HCM 2010 TWSC Long Total AM 6: Colorado/WCR13 & WCR32 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations li if 4, 11 T., 9 + r' Traffic Vol, veh/h 90 5 130 5 5 5 50 195 5 5 290 95 Future Vol, veh/h 90 5 130 5 5 5 50 195 5 5 290 95 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None None - None Storage Length 250 250 250 - 250 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 0 Grade, % - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 95 5 137 5 5 5 53 205 5 5 305 100 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major/ Major2 Conflicting Flow All 634 632 305 700 629 208 305 0 0 211 0 0 Stage 1 316 316 313 313 Stage 2 318 316 - 387 316 - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 392 398 735 354 399 832 1256 1360 Stage 1 695 655 698 657 Stage 2 693 655 637 655 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 372 380 735 275 381 832 1256 1360 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 372 380 275 381 Stage 1 666 653 669 629 Stage 2 654 627 512 653 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 14 14.3 1.6 0.1 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1256 - - 372 710 402 1360 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.042 - 0.255 0.2 0.039 0.004 HCM Control Delay (s) 8 - 18 11.3 14.3 7.7 HCM Lane LOS A - C B B A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 1 0.7 0.1 0 Red Barn Subdivision 02/08/2018 Synchro 9 Light Report Delich Associates It am.syn HCM 2010 TWSC Long Total PM 6: Colorado/WCR13 & WCR32 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 11.5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ) t+ 4 1, " 41 r Traffic Vol, veh/h 150 5 100 5 5 5 150 425 5 5 205 100 Future Vol, veh/h 150 5 100 5 5 5 150 425 5 5 205 100 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - - None None Storage Length 250 - 250 - 250 250 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 0 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 158 5 105 5 5 5 158 447 5 5 216 105 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor/ Major/ Major2 Conflicting Flow All 997 994 216 1048 992 450 216 0 0 453 0 0 Stage 1 226 226 766 766 Stage 2 771 768 - 282 226 - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 223 245 824 206 246 609 1354 1108 Stage 1 777 717 395 412 Stage 2 393 411 725 717 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 197 215 824 160 216 609 1354 1108 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 197 215 160 216 Stage 1 686 714 349 364 Stage 2 339 363 625 714 Approach HCM Control Delay, s 46.4 HCM LOS EB WB NB SB 21.1 2.1 0.1 E C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1354 - - 197 726 240 1108 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.117 - - 0.801 0.152 0.066 0.005 HCM Control Delay (s) 8 - 71.3 10.8 21.1 8.3 HCM Lane LOS A - F BC A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 - 5.6 0.5 0.2 0 Red Barn Subdivision 02/08/2018 Synchro 9 Light Report Delich Associates It pm.syn HCM 2010 TWSC Long Total AM 16: Barnyard & WCR32 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 1.7 EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 'p ►j 4 'fir Traffic Vol, veh/h 200 10 10 140 35 25 Future Vol, veh/h 200 10 10 140 35 25 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None None Storage Length 250 - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 211 11 11 147 37 26 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap -1 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver Mov Cap -2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS B 0 0 221 0 4.12 2.218 1348 1348 384 216 216 168 6.42 6.22 5.42 5.42 3.518 3.318 619 824 820 862 614 824 614 820 855 EB WB NB 0 0.5 10.8 Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 687 - 1348 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.092 - 0.008 HCM Control Delay (s) 10.8 - 7.7 HCM Lane LOS B - A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0 Red Barn Subdivision 02/08/2018 Synchro 9 Light Report Delich Associates It am.syn HCM 2010 TWSC Long Total PM 16: Barnyard & WCR32 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 1.1 EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 'F, 'I + V' Traffic Vol, veh/h 240 35 30 225 20 15 Future Vol, veh/h 240 35 30 225 20 15 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None None Storage Length 250 - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 253 37 32 237 21 16 Major/Minor Major/ Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap -1 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver Mov Cap -2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS 0 0 289 0 4.12 2.218 1273 1273 571 271 271 300 6.42 6.22 5.42 5.42 3.518 3.318 482 768 775 752 470 768 470 775 733 EB WB NB 0 0.9 11.8 B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 564 - 1273 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.065 - 0.025 HCM Control Delay (s) 11.8 - 7.9 HCM Lane LOS B - A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - 0.1 Red Barn Subdivision 02/08/2018 Delich Associates Synchro 9 Light Report It pm.syn HCM 2010 TWSC Long Total AM 3: East Frontage Road & WCR32 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 6.9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4, 4+ 9 1 ) 1+ Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 35 15 70 40 75 5 30 30 55 120 5 Future Vol, veh/h 10 35 15 70 40 75 5 30 30 55 120 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None - None Storage Length 250 250 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 0 Grade, % - 0 - 0 - - 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 11 37 16 74 42 79 5 32 32 58 126 5 Major/Minor Minor2 Minorl Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 363 319 129 329 305 47 132 0 0 63 0 0 Stage 1 245 245 58 58 Stage 2 118 74 - 271 247 - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 593 598 921 624 608 1022 1453 1540 Stage 1 759 703 954 847 - Stage 2 887 833 735 702 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 501 573 921 565 583 1022 1453 1540 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 501 573 565 583 Stage 1 756 677 951 844 - Stage 2 775 830 657 676 Approach HCM Control Delay, s 11.5 HCM LOS EB WB NB SB 12.2 0.6 2.3 B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBREBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1453 - - 616 696 1540 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.004 - 0.103 0.28 0.038 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 - 11.5 12.2 7.4 HCM Lane LOS A - B B A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.3 1.1 0.1 Red Barn Subdivision 02/08/2018 Synchro 9 Light Report Delich Associates It am.syn HCM 2010 TWSC Long Total PM 3: East Frontage Road & WCR32 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 6.6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 4 11 T, Ifi T Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 25 15 50 40 75 40 170 80 90 45 5 Future Vol, veh/h 5 25 15 50 40 75 40 170 80 90 45 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - - None - None Storage Length 250 - 250 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 0 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 5 26 16 53 42 79 42 179 84 95 47 5 Major/Minor Minor2 Minorl Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 605 586 50 566 547 221 53 0 0 263 0 0 Stage 1 239 239 305 305 Stage 2 366 347 - 261 242 - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 410 422 1018 435 445 819 1553 1301 Stage 1 764 708 - 705 662 - Stage 2 653 635 744 705 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 316 381 1018 376 401 819 1553 1301 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 316 381 376 401 Stage 1 743 656 686 644 Stage 2 537 618 652 654 Approach HCM Control Delay, s 13.6 HCM LOS EB WB 15.7 B C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1553 - - 468 509 1301 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.027 - 0.101 0.341 0.073 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.4 - 13.6 15.7 8 HCM Lane LOS A - BC A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 0.3 1.5 0.2 NB 1 SB 5.1 Red Barn Subdivision 02/08/2018 Synchro 9 Light Report Delich Associates It pm.syn APPENDIX I Directors: Bill Szmyd, President Steve Brandenburg Larry Brandt Paul Bukowski Diana Larsen Ed Martens William Prewitt Little Thompson Water District December 15, 2017 District Manager: Michael T. Cook 835 E Highway 56 Berthoud, CO 80513 P: 970-532-2096 F: 970-532-3734 www.LTWD.org Andrew Batson:13-32 Development, LLC Andrew@yourwayhome.com Dear Mr. Batson: This letter is in response to your request for a water service commitment for four hundred fifty seven 5/8" residential services, eleven which are standard taps and the remaining may be considered as urban as long as the lot sizes are generally less than 10,000 square feet. Urban taps require lower tap fees and less raw water dedication per tap. This water service commitment is for the property generally located at the southwest corner of Weld County Road 13 (WCR 13) and WCR 32, Mead, Colorado or more generally described as follows: PORTION OF THE E % of SEC. 24, T3N, R68W -- WELD COUNTY, CO Parcel 120724100046 and Parcel 120724400002 The District provides water service within its service area as defined by the District. The provision of water service by extension of existing water lines of the District to the above property and the installation of taps for lots is done under the terms of the Rules and Regulations of the District established by the Board of the District from time to time. You may obtain a copy of the Rules and Regulations from the District. This letter outlines the provisions of the Rules and Regulations, however this letter does not change any provisions of the Rules and Regulations. The Board of the District may alter and amend the Rules and Regulations at any time, and the provisions of this letter are subject to alteration and amendment based on changes in the Rules and Regulations of the District. We own and operate a 6 -inch line along WCR 32 that extends along the north property line of the mentioned parcel. We also own and operate a 4 -inch and 6 -inch line along WCR 13 that extends along the eastern boundary of the parcel. We can commit to provide service to the above property, subject to the limitations in this letter, for 457 residential 5/8 -inch taps; and the following additional limitations on the provision of water service: 1. All improvements to District facilities required to provide service will be the financial responsibility of the developer in accordance with the District Rules and Regulations. All improvements must conform to District Specifications. 2. Prior to initiating water service, you will need to provide evidence that the property is included in the Municipal Sub District of the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District. You can find information on having your property included in the Municipal Sub District at the offices of the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy. 3. Little Thompson Water District typically does not accept cash in lieu payments for water rights for developments. The developer will be required to provide water rights to meet the minimum projected needs of the proposed development at 0.7 acre-feet for each standard 5/8 -inch tap and 0.35 acre-feet for each urban 5/8 -inch tap. It appears that the applicant may be able to consider 5 standard taps and 72 urban taps for the first phase resulting in a net raw water dedication requirement of 28.7 acre-feet. If standard taps are requested for all of Phase 1 the raw water dedication requirement would be Full buildout would require an additional 135.1 acre-feet assuming the remaining taps include 6 standard taps and 374 urban lots. None the raw water dedication identified above includes any water for irrigation systems in open spaces or other community buildings/facilities. If such water is desired, it should be evaluated later. Currently the District has cash in lieu option available for a limited time. Mr. Batson also has water credits with the District. Please contact Nancy Koch to discuss options for water dedication for the property. 4. For the first phase, a minimum 12 -inch waterline shall be extended from the existing 12 -inch waterline at the end of Knights Way to the property. The 12 -inch line shall be extended through the development parcel to the existing 6 -inch line that connects to WCR 13 and to the 6 -inch line in WCR 32. Future phases will require the construction of a 12 -inch line to replace the existing 4 -inch and 6 -inch lines along WCR 13 and an additional 8 -inch connection to the new 12 -inch line (See attached schematic.) Timing of the line along WCR 13 should occur prior to road improvements (if any are required). Additional points of connectivity to adjacent properties to the west and the south should be provided for future development via easements or rights -of -way. This should be coordinated with the Town of Mead for potential transportation connectivity if they require such. 5. Where fire hydrants are required for the site, there is a $2,000 per fire hydrant fee that needs to be paid prior to installation of the fire hydrant (installed by your contractor). You will be responsible for any system improvements or upgrades needed to meet required fire flows for your development. 6. A 20 -foot wide (minimum) easement shall be required for the proposed waterlines that transverse the property outside Town of Mead rights -of -way. This commitment letter will expire two years from the date of this letter if the taps have not been purchased, paid for and installed by that date of expiration. The current fee for one standard residential 5/8" tap is $11,365 with installation provided by the Developer. The current fee for one urban residential 5/8" tap is $7,365 with installation provided by the Developer. This does not include the required raw water dedication as identified above and required per the District's Rules and Regulations. YOU ARE HEREBY ADVISED THAT THE RULES, REGULATIONS AND TARIFFS OF THE DISTRICT ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE; AND THIS LETTER IS ISSUED WITH THE SPECIFIC LIMITATION THAT THE DISTRICT MAY CHANGE THE RULES, REGULATIONS AND TARIFFS APPLICABLE TO THE ABOVE PROPERTY AT ANY TIME WITHOUT NOTICE TO YOU OR ANY PERSON. If you have questions, please contact me. Regards, Amber Kauffman, PE District Engineer cc: Aurora Charlton, Rocky Ridge Civil Engineering, via email ArcGIS Web Map L -T 1 it'd SEKIGH VALLEY 60 BUSINESS PARK 12/15/2017, 12:15:19 PM Lines as P H 1 - 12" FP -8" FP - 12" • Blowoff Hydrant 0 • t Control Valve System Valve Curb Stop Meter Fitting Cathodic Protection C, Sampling Station PRV Pump Test Station Service Line Network Structure 766 .10. Casing Water Main Abandoned Water Main tSubdivision Asbuilt 1 L_� District Sections Weld County Roads Phase One 1* -inch Waterline Boulder County Roads Larimer County Roads Boulder County Parcels Larimer County Parcels Weld County Parcels Weld County Lakes 4 03N R.:bV/ Boulder County Lakes Larimer County Lakes Rivers Streams Ditches Lake Thomas Future. Phase 12 -inch a erne 1:9,028 0 0.075 0.15 It I. I i lit, t 1 . t 0 0.0750.15 0.3 km 0.3 mi t 18 Tt?3N 67W Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS. USDA, USGS. AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community Web AppBuilder for ArcGIS Joe Robinson I Microsoft Delivered Via Email: egesick(a,weldgov.com February 22, 2018 Weld County Board of Commissioners Attn: Esther Gesick Clerk to the Board P.O. Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 RECEIVED FEB 2 2 2018 WELD COUNTY COMMISSIONERS RE: Request for Comments and Recommendations on the Red Barn Annexation to the Town of Mead. Dear Ms. Ford: The Town of Mead has receivied a request to annex portions of the SE/4 and NE/4 of Section 24, Twp 3 N, Range 68 W of the 6th PM to be known as the Red Barn Annexation to the Town of Mead. This property is located on approximately 200 acres, west of WCR 13 and South of WCR 32. The requested use of the property is for RSF-4 single-family residential uses. The purpose of this referral is to obtain the comments and recommendations of various governmental agencies and service providers as to the appropriateness of the annexation. Your comments are welcome and will assist the staff and Board of Trustees in their review of the proposal. We ask that your comments reach us no later than March 15. The complete application and associated drawings and materials files are located in the following DropBox folder. To access the files, left click on the following URL: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/5nfzul.k2rs2ingw/.AAA6Wyld-fg5BOd4 gy9bzpCa?d1=0 We ask that you forward your response by email directly to Chris Kennedy, Mead Planning Director, at: ckennedyPtownofmead.org, or, by letter to Chris Kennedy, Mead Planning Director, P.O. Box 626, Mead, CO 80542. Thank you for your cooperation and assistance. Very truly yours, e'17)7oti 2,PLejt Mary E. Strutt Town Clerk Town of Mead • 441 Third Street • P.O. Box 626 • Mead, Colorado 80542-0626 • 970-535-4477 • www.townofmead.org ( Re. vi ec: 5O(RS)) PLI(MMfTP), 02 8- /g �f' (Ep eµ!'E� OZ -23 - 2018-0623 Town of f Net' REFERRAL REQUEST TODAY'S DATE: February 21, 2018 PROJECT NAME: RED BARN ANNEXATION PROJECT FILE NO: PROJECT TYPE: ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY COMMENTS DUE BY: MARCH 15, 2018 PLANNER: CHRIS KENNEDY EMAIL: ckennedy(a�townofinead.orq Dear Referral Organization or Agency: Information on the proposal in the Town of Mead referenced above is enclosed for your review and comments. We have no objections to this proposal. Please note the following concerns: nSee attached letter for comments regarding this proposal. Organization or Agency Name Your Name Signature Date Phone PLEASE RETURN TO: Town of Mead, Planning Department PO Box 626 - 441 3rd Street Mead, CO 80542 20180221 Referral Request • Red Barn Annex .wpd 2/21/18 (12:00 pm) Hello