The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20180583.tiffUSE BY SPECIAL REVIEW (USR) APPLICATION DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES * 1555 N. 17TH AVENUE * GREELEY. CO 80631 www.weldciov.com * 970-853-6100 EXT 3540 * FAX 970-304-6498 FOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT USE: AMOUNT APPLICATION RECEIVED BY DATE RECEIVED: CASE # ASSIGNED: PLANNER ASSIGNED: Parcel Number*: Address of site: 1 3 0 5 i 1 9 1 _ o 0 _0 3 2 Legal Description: Part 2N E4 ection: 19 Po' IM•INSAC (A 12 digit number on Tax I.D.. information, obtainable at w� weidgov.corn), Township:, 2 N Range: 64 W Zone District: Ag Acreage: 71 950 Floodplain: ''1 I + ecological Hazard: Y Q4 Airport Overlay: VAIN FEE OWNERfS OF THE PROPERTY: Name: Richard I. Robertson Company: Phone #: 303-961-0031 Street Address: 9537 County Road 51 City/State/Zip Code: Keenesburg, CO 80643 Name: Company: Phone #: Email: pritickrobertson@gmail.com Street Address: Email: City/State/Zip Code: Name: Company: Phone #: Email: Street Address: City/State/Zip Code: APPLICANT OR AUTHORIZED AGENT: (See below. Authorization must accompany all applications signed by Authorize ed Agents) Name: Nicholas Holland Company: Cureton Front Range LLD Phone #: 7204904506 Email: nick.holland@curetonrnidstream.com Street Address: 518 17th St. Suite 650 City/State/Zip Code: Denver, CO 80202 PROPOSED USE: The construction and operation of a 60MMSCFD cryogenic gas processing plant. I (We) hereby depose and state under penalties of perjury that all statements, proposals, and/or plans submitted with or contained within the application are true and correct to the best of my (our)knowledge, Signatures of all fee owners of property must sign this application, If an Authorized Agent signs, a letter of authorization from all fee owners must be included with the application. If a corporation is the fee owner, notarized evidence must be included indicating that the signatory has to legal authori'to - `g r ; ration. Sign ture: Owner or Authorized Agent at andoszt5 //0Ls4j/L2 Signature: Owner or Authorized Agent Date Print Name Print Name Rev 4/2016 LSRETh\ MIDSTREAM 518 17TH S'TREEtSUITE 650 DENVER, Co80202 PHONE 303-324-5967 November 2, 2017 Chris Gathman Planner III Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, Co RE: Cureton Front Range Gas Plant USR Application Mr. Gathman, Cureton Front Range, LLC (Cureton) is pleased to submit the USR Application for the Front Range Gas Plant located in Weld County, CO. Please review the attached application for completeness and let me know if we can provide any additional information prior to the Referral Agency comment period. Cureton looks forward to working with Weld County on this project. Please contact me directly with any questions or comments. Thank you for your time in reviewing our submittal. Sincerely, Nick Holland Director EHSR Cureton Midstream O: 720-390-4506 nicl.holland@curetonmidstram.cor DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND EN JRONNMENT 1555 NORTH 17111 AVENUE GREELEY, CO 80631 AUTHORIZATION FORM FOR BUILDING, PLANNING AND HEALTH DEPARTMENT PERMITS AND SERVICES I(We)Richard I. Robertson (Owner— please print) give permission to Cureton Front Range PLC (Applicant/Agent — please print) to apply for any Planning. Building or Heath Department permits or services on our behalf, for the property located at: Parcel 'I30519100032 Legal Description: Part 2N E4 of Section 19 , Township,2 N, Range b4 W Subdivision Name: Lot Property Owners Information: Phone: 303961M031 Email: Block Applicant/Agent Contact Information: Phone: 7203904506 Email. nick.holland@curetonmidstrearnscorin Email correspondence to be sent to: Owner Applicant/Agent Both: Postal service correspondence to be sent to: (choose only one) Owner Applicant/Agent Additional Info: x Owner Signature: Datea IAL f Owner Signature: Date:, ,+ DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONNMENT NNMENT 1555 NORTH 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, CO 80631 AUTHORIZATION FORM FOR BUILDING, PLANNING AND HEALTH DEPARTMENT PERMITS AND SER I E I, (We), permission�ureton Front Range LLC give to Nicholas Holland (Owner a please print) (Applicant/Agent — please print) to apply for any Planning, Building or Health Department permits or services on our behalf, for the property located at Parcel 1305'19100032 Legal Description: Part2NE4__of Section 19 , Township � N, Range 64 W Subdivision Name: Lot Block _ Property Owners Information: E_ Phone: 720-390-4555 maEi,Charlie.beecherl@curetonmidstream.com Applicant/Agent Contact Information: Phone: 72O -39a-4506 111Ck.holland@curetonmidstream.com Email correspondence to be sent to: Owner �Applicant/Agent . Both Postal service correspondence to be sent to:(choose only P one) Owner _ . Applicant/Agent , Additional Info: Owner Signature: • Date //-_2 42-0/ Owner Signature:_ Date: CURETON MIDSTREAM Front Range Gas Plant Cureton Front Range LLC Lot B, RE -3799 Part of the PT S2NE4 19-2-64 (.91R) Parcel 130519100032 USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW APPLICATION FOR OURETUN MIDSTREAM 518 17th Street Suite 650 Denver, CO 80202 FRONT RANGE GAS PLANT Weld County, Colorado Lot B, RE -3799 Part of the PT S2NE4 19-2-64 (.91R) Parcel 130519100032 11-1-2017 *rir* 040400040000rir*0404000040400000004Mir0r004M000Mir0MM004rir0rir 4 0 0408 3 COMPREHENSIVE SURFACE IMPACT PLAN CURETUN 'V MIDSTREAM Front Range Gas Plant Cureton Front Range LLC Lot B, RE -3799 Part of the PT S2NE4 19-2-64 (.91R) Parcel 130519100032 1 Table of Contents 1 PROJECT OVERVIEW .....3 2 USR QUESTIONNAIRE 3 2.1 LAND USE 3 2.1.1 Proposed Use of The Property. r r ! r- r M r 2.1.2 Consistency with the intent of the Weld County Code, Chapter 22 of the Comprehensive Planir0ri 4 2.1..E Consistency with the intent of the Weld County Code, Chapter 23 (Zoning) and the zone district in which it is located ..rr 5 ! 2.1.4 Proposed Use Compatibility with Surrounding Land Uses 5 2.1.5 Inter -Governmental Agreement 5 2.2 SITE DETAILS 6 {� / � and �'y of /y / /� �+y . rir * r 4 2.2.1 Hours and Days Operations urrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr 6 2.2.2 Full Time and Part Time Employees 6 2.2..E Number of People Using the Site 6 2..2.4 Animals 6 2.2.5 Lot Surface and Square Footage 6 2.2.6 Parking Spaces ri 00 00 00 00 00 rrrrrrrr 00 00 000 00 00 rrrrrrrr 6 2.2.7 Landscaping ...404 r4 .. .. rr rr r4 ■rrr 0 6 2.2.8 Security Fencing 7 2.2.9 Screening*044404*ir*04040*r4rir0r4r* 000r4r* r4r4r*ririr*ri*0r404***00!00*r*POrir0r0r*!4040* Pen r00*4 PO r0r*r 4r4040*ririr*0*00r0MMii*Mir0M*MOMOM*Miririr4M40 2.2.10 Remediatian PPP, rir*PPP*POPOrrrrr4rir4r4!lPPrrrrr4rir*M4rlr4rrr rii* POP illrir4*4*i**rplillrir4i4r44r4r4rPPSr4rrrrrpr40404r*r4rr 00400r4rrrrrrr*rrr4r 7 2.2.11 Fire Protection 2.2.12 On -Site and Off -Site Improvements rr►i r4 ►i rM4 rr 4 7 2.2.13 LSD/.jMap- - -- - - - Mi ii Or i - - - -- - Mi Mi ii- -- - - - - - M - - -Mi 044..8 2.3 BUILDING r4*0404.................................8 2.3.1 Existin and Proposed Structures. 04 04 04 04 04 0* ►404 M4 r*00ri 10101•0 1•4 1•4 r4 1•4►i►4Mi Mi Di 1•4 ri ri4 2.4 TRAFFIC 8 2.4.1 Vehicle Roundtrips per day 2.4.2 Travel Route.. 8 •2,4.3 Trot el Distribution ution rl0000000. rl il0*i rl rb r4 rl0000 *1040106 r. - - - - - ri*8 2.4.4 Traffic Volumes 8 e+� r. 2., 4.5 Site Access . 8 245 DRAINAGE r*r4 rr4 ......rir 00040! r4riririr4 rii 8 2.5.1 Drainage Design 0000 rr0rrr0rrr0r0rr0r0rr8 2.6 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH .9 0 0 -- r- 0 - - r r 7 ►4M*Miii 00 M*0*00r*0* 0i0'f.+ ,2.6.1 Drinking Water Source 9 2.6.2 Sewage 9 •2.. .3 Storage 9 2.6.4 Vehicle Washing 40409 2.6.5 Floor Drains 9 2..6.6 Air Quality 10 10 301 COMMUNITY OUTREACH AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN 10 3.1.1 Purpose ..*r4ril4rir*r*044*r4 *►* 0400r4rir0rr0rir0r4r 4r*r400ririr40ir*r*ir*0ir*r04400446 O 000 400r4M 10 3,1.2 Stakeholder Identification 11 3,1.3 Stakeholder Outreach Activities11 3,1.4 Communications Overview 1.5 1 CURETUN 'V MIDSTREAM Front Range Gas Plant Cureton Front Range LLC Lot B, RE -3799 Part of the PT S2NE4 19-2-64 (.91R) Parcel 130519100032 3.1.5 Certificate of Conveyances t!ilt1, 3.1.6 Property 0 n er List ti! t! t! t. t! t!.15 3.2 CONSTRUCTION ..,.1.,.,,.16 3.21 Access Permits 16 3.2.2 Water Quality ......,l.! ........16 3.2.3 Air Quality 16 3.2.4 Biological, Cultural and Historical Resources Survey 16 3.2.5 Traffic ...16 3.2E DustAbatement17 3,3 OPERATIONS ,., .................17 3.3.1 Noise Evaluation and Abatement Plan 17 3.3.2 Lighting 18 3..3.3 Waste Management 18 3..3.4 Air Quality. ,. it i! i!- - -.. - -18 3..3.5 Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasure Plan 18 13.6 Emergency Response Planning t!!t!t!i!t!t t!t 18 List of Appendices Appendix A Appendix B Appendix Appendix D Appendix E Appendix F Appendix Appendix H Appendix l Appendix J Appendix K Appendix L Appendix M Appendix N Appendix 0 Pre -Application Meeting Minutes (PRE1 O25 Inter Governmental Boundary Meeting Notes/ Notice of Inquiry Email USR Vicinity Map and Plot Plan D ra i n age Narrative and Preliminary Design Concept Map Existing Water Weil Permit Landowner Meeting Notes/Community Outreach Meeting Notes Certificate of Conveyances Property Owner List Access Permit Storm Water Management F`Ian/CoIorado Storm Water Discharge Permit siktir Permit Biological, Cultural and Historical Resources Survey =.vise Evaluation and Abatement Plan Waste Management Plan Emergency Response Plan 2 CURETUN 'V MIDSTREAM Front Range Gas Plant Cureton Front Range LLC Lot B, RE -3799 Part of the PT S2NE4 19-2-64 (.91R) Parcel 130519100032 1 Project Overview Cureton Front Range, LLC (Cureton) is designing a gas gathering system and gas processing facility in Weld County, Colorado, The enclosed application and associated documentation for a Use by Special Review Permit (USR) is for the construction of 60 million standard cubic feet per day (MMSCFD) cryogenic gas processing plant, Front Range Gas Plant. Additional USR permit applications will be submitted for any future plants, compressor stations, pipelines or other facilities applicable to the USR process. A pre -application meeting was held on September 14, 2017 Case File PRE17-0245. A copy of the Pm -Application Meeting Minutes is located in Appendix A. The Front Range Gas Plant (Plant) is located near the intersection of Weld County Road 51 and Weld County Road 20, The site is located approximately 3.7 5 miles northwest of Keenesburg, Weld County, Co. The site address is to be determined. Cureton is currently under contract to buy and sell real estate with Richard I. Robertson for two Parcels (#130519100032, 130519100029). The total size of the two parcels equates to 145.8813 acres. The size of the property to be purchased by Cureton, will be reduced in area to reflect the proposed area associated with Lot B of recorded exemption RE -3799 and will have a separate address, Cureton as part of this application will submit a two lot Recorded Exemption application per their business model to split off the permitted and proposed improvements onto separate parcels Cureton intends to construct the proposed Plant during the 1st Quarter of 2018. All items presented in this application are preliminary and are subject to change until final design is complete. 2 USR Questionnaire 2.1 Land Use 2. 1.1 Proposed Use of The Property The Plant will take raw natural gas gathered from pipelines connected to wells located in Adams and Weld Counties. The Plant will have a processing capacity of 60MM CFD. The Plant layout will consist of two pipelines with a slug catcher, stabilization, a cryogenic unit with a molecular sieve and refrigeration packages, residue gas compression, a facility flare and associated buildings. Plant utilities will include: fuel gas, hot oil, methanol injection, instrument air, liquids storage and fired destruction units. Plant equipment will be ground level or at a height of one to two stories. Exceptions to theses general heights are the Plant flare at 125' maximum height, the cryogenic tower at 120' maximum height, the stabilizer tower at 60' maximum height and the molecular sieve units at 30' maximum height. The property line for the gas plant is a minimum of 522 feet from the closest residence. The plant equipment is located an additional 178' south of the property line and 700 feet from the nearest residential property. There currently are no plans to develop the 43.1 -acre parcel adjacentto this parcel and will remain as native grasses. 3 CURETUN 'V MIDSTREAM Front Range Gas Plant Cureton Front Range LLC Lot B, RE -3799 Part of the PT S2NE4 19-2-64 (.91R) Parcel 130519100032 2.1.1.1 Process Overview: Raw natural gas enters the facility via pipeline into a slug catcher. Liquids from the slug catcher will be processed in a stabilizer unit to form a natural gas liquids product (NW. Although the anticipated maximum gas flow is 60 MMSCFD, the slug catcher will be over -sized for a maximum total flow rate of 70 MMSCFD of gas and 1,500 barrels per day of liquids. Gas from the slug catcher will be metered and then combined. This product will be blended and transported via pipeline with the NGL's from the cryogenic processing unit. The vapors from the stabilizer unit will be recycled to the inlet of the plant where they will blend with the incoming gas. This inlet gas will be dehydrated by molecular sieve and then processed in a refrigeration unit and cryogenic processing unit to further remove NGL's from the gas stream. Processed gas will be recompressed, metered, and transported via pipeline. Waste products such as produced water is transported via truck to disposal sites. The plant flare will only operate during maintenance operations and in emergency pressure relief situations. Maintenance activities for the compressors are expected once per month for 30 minutes or less. Emergency pressure relief events are seldom and cannot be predicted. A combustor may be utilized for vapors on water and condensate tanks. Each pipeline entering the facility will have its own pig receiver. 2.1.2 Consistency with the intent of the Weld County Code, Chapter 22 of the Comprehensive Plan Section 22-2-10(D) of the Weld County Code states that "extraction of natural resources is an important part of the economy of the County." The proposed processing facility will contribute to the expansion of the county's industrial economic base by providing increased capacity for future marketing of oil and gas production in Weld County. Additionally, Section 22-5-100 (A) states that a County goal is to "promote the reasonable and orderly exploration and development of oil and gas mineral resources." The proposed facility is consistent with this section in that the proposed site is within agricultural land, and is clustered close to other oil and gas facilities. Per Chapter 22, oil and gas facilities are allowed as a use by right in the A (Agricultural) Zone District. However, oil and gas storage facilities, oil and gas support, and associated services require a Use by Special Review (USR) permit in Weld County. Section 22-2-20. .2.A. Policy 7.2 states "Conversion of agricultural land to nonurban residential, commercial and industrial uses should be accommodated when the subject site is in an area that can support such development, and should attempt to be compatible with the region." The Plant is located on dryland grasses in a semi -rural area where there is a significant amount of oil and gas activity already occurring. Section 22-5-100. B.O .+ oal 2. states "Ensure that the extraction of oil and gas resources conserves the land and minimizes the impact on surrounding land and the existing surrounding land use," while Section 22-5-100.B (OG. Goal2) strive to, "Ensure that the extraction of oil and gas resources conserves the land and minimizes the impact on surrounding land and the existing 4 CURETUN 'V MIDSTREAM Front Range Gas Plant Cureton Front Range LLC Lot B, RE -3799 Part of the PT S2NE4 19-2-64 (.91R) Parcel 13O519100032 surrounding land uses? Section 22-5-100.3, (0G. Policy 2.9) outlines the objective to, "impose protective measures through available state, County and federal regulations to ensure the mineral operator conducts operations in a manner that will minimize current and future environmental impacts." The USR application for an oil and gas support service aids in the centralization of oil and gas operations in the area on a parcel of land still being utilized for Agricultural use. 2.1.3 Consistency with the intent of the Weld County Code, Chapter 23 (Zoning) and the zone district in which it is located Section 23-3-10 indicates that uses that are ",more intense and have a potentially greater impact" are permitted within the A (Agricultural) zone district. The operation of a processing facility for oil and gas operations while minimally intrusive is more suited for less densely populated areas such as the proposed site. In addition, the parcel currently has oil and gas production and other associated oil and gas infrastructure on the property and within close proximity of this property. Section 23-3-40 also indicates that oil and gas support and service facilities are acceptable as a Use bySpecial Review within the district. Citing the Weld County Code, Section 2-3-40.A.2 provides for a Site -Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for Mineral Resource Development facilities, including, oil and Gas Support and Service, Natural gas processing facilities, related equipment and structures; Section 23-3-4OA7 for Transloading; Section 23-3-40.5 for outdoor equipment and materials storage yard and Section 23-3-30.K for two or more Cargo (Conex) Container(s) in the A (Agricultural) Zone District. 2.14 Proposed Use Compatibility with Surrounding Land Uses The surrounding parcels can be classified as mixed use with agricultural, industrial and residential properties surrounding the proposed site. The subject property has existing oil and gas extraction and production infrastructure, Oil and gas operations are occurring on parcels adjacent to the property. The proposed Plant is located in a rural area of the County where there is generally limited residential development. There are several similar uses associated with oil and gas development, including pipelines, well heads and tank batteries. While construction of the site will generate some impacts because of the extra activity and trips to the site, once it is constructed and fully operational limited truck traffic will be present from the facility. 2.1.5 Inter -Governmental g,reement The southeastern portion of Parcel# 130519100032 is located within an Inter -Governmental Agreement (IGA) boundary area with the Town of Keenesburg. Following the USR pre -application meeting on 9/14/2017 Chris Gathman (Weld County, Planning Department) sent a project overview to the Town of Keenesburg. Cureton contacted Debra Chum ley (Town Manager) at the Town of Keenesburg and set up a meeting for 9/19/2017 at the Town of Keenesburg Town Hall. Detailed minutes taken at the meeting, a Notice of Inquiry from Debra Chumley to Weld County are located in Appendix B. 5 CURETUN 'V MIDSTREAM Front Range Gas Plant Cureton Front Range LLC Lot B, RE -3799 Part of the PT S2NE4 19-2-64 (.91R) Parcel 130519100032 2.2 Site Details 2.2.1 Hours and Days of Operations The hours of operation for the facility will be 24 hours/day, 365 days/year. 2.; .2 Full Time and Part Time Employees There will be approximately 12-18 full-time employees working at this site. Two shifts per day are anticipated. 2.2.2.1 Employees Per Shift The day shift will have approximately 4-7 full time employees, followed by a night shift with 2-3 employees. Shift hours have yet to be confirmed, but a typical shift rotation may be 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. 2.2.3 Number of People Using the site Approximately 6-10 people per day, including full time employees, contractors and third -party truck drivers (refer to section 2.4 for details on truck traffic). 2,2,4 Animals There will be no animals on site. 2.2.5 Lot Surface and Square Footage Total disturbed area will encompass approximately 33.5 acres, 1,479,000 square feet including approximately 4 acres directly east of the proposed plant site designated as a temporary equipment staging area. No asphalt or additional landscaping is proposed inside of the fence lines. Gravel or road base will be placed inside the fenced areas covering approximately 762,300 square feet, ditches will be bare ground with gravel on mild slopes covering 125,600 square feet. The remaining 591,100 square feet will be replanted with native grasses. 2.2.6 Parking Spaces During operations, no more than 10 parking spaces will be required for site personnel. During construction, all parking will be limited to the inside of the site fenced areas. 2.2.7 Landscaping A Landscaping Plan will be developed concurrently with the final grading and drainage design plan. Cureton will also incorporate any mitigation measures into the landscaping plan for screening and noise as applicable. Refer to section 2.2.9 for further screening details and to section 3 for further details regarding Noise Evaluation and Abatement Plan. 6 CURETUN 'V MIDSTREAM Front Range Gas Plant Cureton Front Range LLC Lot B, RE -3799 Part of the PT S2NE4 19-2-64 (.91R) Parcel 13O519100032 Cureton is currently engaging surrounding stakeholders to solicit their feedback and input regarding the proposed plant. Cureton is attempting to meet individually with all the directly impacted stakeholders and will also be holding a Community Open House to review the project plans and solicit feedback. Please see Section 3 for more information on Community Outreach and Public Participation. Stakeholder feedback will be taken into consideration and reasonably accommodated into the Landscaping Plan where possible. 2. 2.8 Security Fencing A standard 6' chain link security fence is proposed at the facility. An entrance gate located at the Plant main entrance will also be constructed for plant ingress and egress. 2.2.9 Screening A Screening Plan will be developed concurrently with the final grading and drainage design plan. Cureton will also incorporate any mitigation measures into the landscaping plan for screening and noise as applicable. Refer to section 3 for further details regarding Noise Evaluation and Abatement Plan. Cureton is currently engaging surrounding stakeholders to solicit their feedback and input regarding the proposed plant. Cureton is attempting to meet individually with all the directly impacted stakeholders and will also be holding a Community Meeting to review the project plans and solicit feedback. Please see Section 3 for more information on Community Outreach and Public Participation. Stakeholder feedback will be taken into consideration and reasonably accommodated into the Landscaping Plan where possible. 2.2.10 Remediation There is no intention of ceasing operations of this facility once it is operational, however if the plant is deemed obsolete, the plant closure will follow all Federal, State and Local (County) regulations. All post construction areas will be reclaimed with native grasses. 2.2.11 Fire Protection The Plant is located within the Hudson Fire Protection District jurisdiction and will rely on the Hudson Fire District to provide emergency response services to the facility. Cureton will engage with the Hudson Fire Chief and appropriate fire stations to ensure all emergency response personnel are familiar with the Plant and the appropriate level of response per incident As defined in the Emergency Response Plan, Cureton will conduct tabletop scenario training worth all emergency response personnel (internal and external) for the Plant. Please refer to section 3 for further details about Emergency Response and Emergency Action Planning. 2.2.12 On -Site and Off -Site Improvements There are no of site improvements planned for this project. Onsite improvements will include perimeter fencing for the facility, landscaping and gravel roads on the property to access the facility. Construction activities are expected to begin following receipt of the applicable federal, state, and local permits and will last approximately 3-4 months. Construction is expected to begin in the 1st Quarter of 2018. Restoration of the site and final clean-up will begin immediately following completion of construction activities expected to be around August 2018. 7 CURETUN 'V MIDSTREAM Front Range Gas Plant Cureton Front Range LLC Lot B, RE -3799 Part of the PT S2NE4 19-2-64 (.91R) Parcel 130519100032 2.2.13 USR Map Per the Weld County USR Procedural Guide Checklist, a Vicinity Map and Plot Plan have been included in Appendix C. 2.3 Building 2.3.1 Existing and Proposed Structures There are no existing structures on site. The Plant will have 1 control room building totaling 3,000 square feet and 1 separate MCC building totaling 2,000 square feet. 2.4 Traffic 2.4.1 Vehicle Roundtrips per day During construction, semi -tractor trailers will be used to haul equipment and materials to the site, along with passenger cars/trucks for site workers and construction management. Following construction of the facility, during normal operation, the following vehicles are anticipated to access the site: Passenger Cars/Pickups (approximately 10-15 round trips per day) and 200 bbl. Tanker trucks/tandem trucks (approximately 2-3 round trips per day). 2.4..E Travel Route Traffic will access the site mainly from Interstate 76, north on Weld County Road (WCR) 49, east on WCR 18 and north on WCR 51. WCR 49 and WCR 18 are asphalt paved roads. 2.4.3 Travel Distribution Trucks and delivery vehicles will use WCR 49 north to WCR 18 east to WCR51. 20 percent of traffic of which will be passenger cars, pickup trucks and small delivery vehicles could use WCR53 north to WCR1S west to WCR51. 2.4.4 Traffic Volumes There will be two operators on site for the night shift and five personnel on site for the day shift. Traffic may be slightly heavier in the morning around 8 am when the shift change takes place. 245 site Access The access for this site will be directly from WCR 51, no agreement with adjacent landowners will be necessary. Refer to section 3.2.1 for further details regarding the Access Permit. 2.5 Drainage 2.5.1 Drainage Design A storm water detention pond will be required for this site. The drainage report and detention will follow all requirements of the storm water drainage code located under Chapter 23, Article 12 Storm Drainage Criteria. The detention pond will be designed following the above code and Urban Drainage 8 CURETUN 'V MIDSTREAM Front Range Gas Plant Cureton Front Range LLC Lot B, RE -3799 Part of the PT S2NE4 19-2-64 (.91R) Parcel 13O519100032 Flood Control District criteria for a Non -Urbanizing Drainage Area and will retain the 1 -hour 100 -year storm with the release rate for the 1 -hour 10 -year storm events. A narrative with the preliminary drainage concept described is included in Appendix D. 2.6 Environmental Health 2.6.1 Drinking Water Source The proposed location for the Plant has an existing water well permit. The existing Permit number is 233845 under single family dwellings, watering of poultry, domestic animals and irrigation not more than 1 acre. Drinking water will be utilized from the existing well. Cureton discussed the process of re -permitting the existing water well to a commercial water well with the Colorado Division of Water Resources (CDWR). The CDWR advised Cureton to apply for the re -permitting after the recorded exemption is completed so the legal description can be included with the application. The existing water well permit is located in Appendix E. 2,6..2 Sewage A septic system is proposed and will be the source of sanitary on the site. A septic permit will be applied for during the USR process upon completion of the design. 2.63 Storage 2.O.3.1 Storage Occurrence The majority of storage will be located in the shop and control room buildings. The following materials are expected for a plant of this type: 1. Heat Transfer OH 2. Lube Oil 3. Methanol 4. Ethylene Glycol 5, Grease All chemicals/oils will be stored and handled as per the guidance provided on the Safety Data Sheets (SDSs). During construction Conex containers will be needed for contractor's materials and equipment storage, it is expected that 5-1O of these containers will be needed at the peak of construction. On -site contractors will also require construction trailers with of these expected to be required at the peak of construction. These are temporary and will be removed after construction is complete. 2.6.3.2 Fuel Storage Fuel will not be stored on site in quantities greater than 5 gallons; the facility will operate using a small portion of the inlet gas as fuel for the inlet compressors, for burners within the process train, and for the flare. 2.6.4 Vehicle Washing No vehicle washing is proposed for this site 2.6.5 Floor Drains 0 CURETUN 'V MIDSTREAM Front Range Gas Plant Cureton Front Range LLC Lot B, RE -3799 Part of the PT S2NE4 19-2-64 (.91R) Parcel 130519100032 Floor drains are not proposed for this site. 2.6.6 Air Quality Per Colorado Regulation No. 3, Part B, Section II, Cureton has applied for construction permits for air e missions associated with the proposed plant, stationary source. In addition, per Colorado Regulation No. 3, Part B, Section III, Cureton will apply for general permits for those air emission sources that have an applicable general permit prior to commencing construction of such sources. Per regulation No. 3, Cureton is required to apply through submittal of Air Pollution Emission Notice and Construction Permit Application and receive issued Construction Permits prior to commencing construction of any stationary source unless the activity is exempt as detailed in Regulation No. 3, Part B, Section II.i, The Air Pollution Control Division (Division) has confirmed receipt of the air permit application and has assigned the following AIRS #'s to emission sources located within the Plant: AIRS# 123-9F67-001-005 3 Comprehensive Surface Impact Plan The comprehensive Surface Impact Plan is a crucial piece to the development and operation of the Plant. Cureton has taken steps and outlined future steps to assess potential impacts to the land, environment and neighboring residents. Cureton has engaged with third party consultants that provide an expertise in noise, landscaping, screening, reclamation, surface disturbance, drainage design, public affairs and community► involvement. The goal of the comprehensive surface impact plan is to develop a comprehensive approach to mitigate impacts of the proposed plant by engaging n eighboring residents, incorporate mitigation design through proven engineering solutions by licensed engineers, allow for stakeholder feedback to the mitigation design to address potential impacts and provide an educational and informational platform to the surrounding neighbors and community through a robust Community Outreach and Public Participation Plan. 3.1 Community Outreach and Public Participation Plan Cureton is committed to engaging with its landowners, elected and appointed officials, emergency response personnel and other interested and applicable stakeholders. Cureton is seeking input through a series of one on one meetings, open forums, and open house(s). The open communication taking place now will continue through the USR approval process, during construction and into o perations of the Plant. The Community Outreach and Public Participation Plan was developed in accordance with the best practices and accepted methods utilized by many segments of O&G industry and the public guidelines set forth by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERO) in the document titled "Suggested Best Practices for Industry Outreach Programs to Stakeholders", released July 2015. 3.1.1 Purpose The purpose of this Plan is to identify key stakeholders and potential concerns related to the proposed Project, to determine and establish appropriate and effective methods of communication with stakeholders, document the public consultation process, and adhere to approved and appropriate communication protocols. Cureton is committed to seeking out greater involvement from the various affected groups early in the planning stage so that those who are interested may participate in the design of the Project Our goal is to involve stakeholders to achieve consensus and 10 CURETON MIDSTREAM Front Range Gas Plant Cureton Front Range LLC Lot B, RE -3799 Part of the PT S2NE4 19-2-64 (.91R) Parcel 130519100032 settlements on mutually acceptable project designs. Cureton believes an early and more collaborative approach will lead to a Project design that will minimize the effect to landowners, communities, and the environment. 3.1.2 Stakeholder Identification The Project is focusing its efforts on reaching the following audiences: • Landowners • Fire Chiefs • Emergency Management Officials • Emergency First Responders • Local law enforcement agencies • Mayors, city councils, and/or administrators • County and municipal planning organizations • County commissioners, county boards and/or county councils • State, and local regulatory agencies • Economic development agencies/Chambers of Commerce • Non -Governmental Organizations • State senators (local area staff) • State congressmen (local area staff) • Federal elected officials • U.S. senators (local district staff) • U.S. congressmen (local district staff) • Local media outlets .13 Stakeholder Outreach Activities The Project will employ stakeholder outreach activities and methods to ensure successful communication between Cureton and the public. 3.1.3.1 Stakeholder identification list and issues management database/tracking system. After identifying stakeholders, Cureton will develop and maintain a contact management system to track contact with these stakeholders in a manner that helps identify and resolve emerging issues and concerns. 3.1.3.2 Project Information materials. Cureton will develop messages and materials to inform stakeholders about the Project and to address potential questions and areas of concern. These materials will include, for example: • A Project Overview sheet. • Standard presentation information posters and other materials for use at Community Open Houses and other meetings. • Internal Project guidance concerning key messages about the Project to ensure consistency in communication. • Cureton will publish a dedicated website to the project that will be updated periodically with important project information. 11 CURETUN 'V MIDSTREAM Front Range Gas Plant Cureton Front Range LLC Lot B, RE -3799 Part of the PT S2NE4 19-2-64 (.91R) Parcel 130519100032 Messages and materials about the Project will be refined throughout the development stage to contain updated information and to address stakeholder concerns that may arise. 3.1.3.3 Website. Because of its accessibility and the ability to be constantly updated, online communications will play a vital role in stakeholder dialogue. In addition to serving as a Project repository for up-to-date materials and information, the Project website will feature mechanisms for stakeholders to ask questions and provide input about the Project. The Project website will contain: narrative overview of the Project Map of the proposed location of the Project • Information about the Community Open House • Information on upcoming public hearings • Links to partner company websites, Weld County, Colorado Oil & Gas Conservation Commission, etc. 3.1.3.4 Direct Contact Recognizing the importance of communicating directly with affected and potentially affected landowners, Cureton has undertaken a direct contact campaign to all landowners within a 1/2 mile radius of the plant site. Table 3.1 below provides an overview of outreach to the landowners within the mile radius and contact made by Cureton as of 11/1/2017. A more detailed meeting minutes document is in Appendix F. The document in Appendix F provides minutes for all Community Outreach and Public Participation meetings Cureton has held regarding the project as of 11/1/2017. Table 3.1 Direct Contact Meeting Notes Account # Contact Person Notes/Result R1516102 Mr. Hayward Ivan 10/30/2017 discuss 10/19/2017 the meeting. - project. - Met Spoke with with Mr. Mr. and Hayward Mrs. Hayward on the at phone their residence to setup a to R8945433 Mr. Mcadow Ross 10/30/2017 - Sent 10/19/2017 - Spoke information via email. email with with Mr. project info. Meadow on the phone. He requested R0947901 Mr. Mary David Ellen Bell Bell for 10/31/2017 10/30/2107 3:00 10/25/2017 back - - Spoke PM for a meeting. - Spoke for meeting. Met Mr. to with Bell Mr. at Bell. Mr. his He Bell residence agreed via telephone. at to Tuesday 3:00 Harvest pm. October time 31 will at try R4683107 Mr. Trent Cook 10/30/2017 10/19/2017 Harvest 10/25/2017 - - time will - Left Spoke Left call Voicemail back Voicemail with Mr. for Cook on a meeting. the phone to setup a meeting. CURETON MIDSTREAM Front Range Gas Plant Cureton Front Range LLC Lot B, RE -3799 Part of the PT S2NE4 19-2-64 (.91R) Parcel 130519100032 R5073286 Front Resources Range LLC 10/25/2017 - 10/19/2017 - Left Left Voicemail Voicemail R8945434 Mr. O'hotto Shayne 10/19/2017 for an extended - Spoke period to Mr. but will O'hotto meet on the once he phone. He is out of town returns. R0576001 Jackson Mr. Justin K. 10/23/2017 - project. 10/19/2017 - Met Spoke Mr. Jackson with Mr. Jackson at his residence to setup to discuss the a meeting. R5075286 Mrs. Reis Barbara 11/1/2017 Phone number number or attempt - Attempted was wrong. other to call Will form of number look communication. at different provided through sources to Lexus find Nexus. correct R5075386 Mrs. Sherrie Denning L. 11/1/2017 Phone number number or attempt - Attempted was wrong. other to call Will form of number look communication. at different provided through sources to Lexus find Nexus. correct R5075486 Johnson Mr. Virgil H. 11/2/2017 number 11/1/2017 through find correct will Lexus - attempt - number Located Mr. Nexus Johnson call is or Mr. disconnected. attempt Johnson on 11/2/2017 is deceased. other Son. Will form Acquired Phone look of communication. number at his different cell provided phone sources to R0575901 Mr. Ashley John R. 11/1/2017 mail meeting he would yet, but if just he - will Spoke was look look not for to for able the John. it. to invite He He said was make in the a the he bit mail. reserved, Nov. hasn't 14th seen anything I offered meeting in a separate and the he said R8946698 Dechant Partnership Farm 11/1/2017 a can 11/1/2017 house the text. project. bring He and also his - attorney - to call David asked Sent said Text back if if he if he to he could he was would David would busy bring like with like to. date, at his to the attorney, meet moment I time and one on told location and one to send him yes, of open to discuss him he R5075986 BDLR LLC 11/1/2017 - Left voicemail for Russell Gurtler. 3.1.3.5 Pop -Up Display. The Project plans to hold informal public informational forums at multiple locations. The purpose is to introduce Cureton to the public at large in the communities that Cureton is looking to operate. The format includes a table, company signage, Project handouts, and staffing by company representatives to answer questions and provide additional details. The Pop -Up display will be open for several hours at a time. Feedback from these events will be evaluated and incorporated as appropriate. CURETON MIDSTREAM Front Range Gas Plant Cureton Front Range LLC Lot B, RE -3799 Part of the PT S2NE4 19-2-64 (.91R) Parcel 130519100032 Pop -Up Displays Scheduled as of 11/1/2017 • 11/3/2017 - Keenesburg Town Hall Keenesburg, Co • 11/4/2017 - Hudson Locker, Hudson, Co 3.1.3.6 Community Open House. Cureton is holding an Open House during the fourth quarter of 2017. Careful consideration was given to the location, day of the week, and time, to accommodate as many interested participants as possible. The Plant open house is scheduled for: November 14, 2017 5:00-8:00 PM South East Weld County Fair Grounds 7758 WCR 59 Keenesburg, CO 80643 3.13.7 Open House Overview Landowners with property located within ;1, -mile of the proposed location of the Project will receive open house invitation letters via the U.S. Postal Service providing information on the Project, the time, location, and format of the open house. Additionally, other key stakeholders will also be notified and invited by letters sent through the U.S. mail. The meeting location was selected so that stakeholders will not need to travel long distances to participate. A "station" format is the most likely format for the open house meeting. Stations will be established to explain different aspects of the Project and Cureton. Each station will contain information pertinent to that area of project responsibility. Project team members will be positioned at each station to answer general and specific questions from stakeholders. Guests are welcome to come and go at their convenience. This allows attendees arriving at different times to circulate among the stations and gather the information in a more personal setting. The information provided to attendees will be basic to allow people who are unfamiliar with a project like a gas processing facility and to gain an understanding about the project. The project team members in attendance will have the experience and knowledge to answer technical questions as well. 3.1.3. 7.1. Proposed Open House Stations: • About Cureton Project Overview and Timeline • Noise, Lighting, and Screening Mitigation • Engineering & Construction Best Practices • Safety and Environmental 3.1.3.8 Project Contact Information. The Project will operate and monitor a toll -free phone number 1 1.-833 CURETON (287- 3866)), e-mail address (info@curetonmidstream.com), that enables stakeholders to obtain additional project information and provide input. This project contact 14 CURETON MIDSTREAM Front Range Gas Plant Cureton Front Range LLC Lot B, RE -3799 Part of the PT S2NE4 19-2-64 (.91R) Parcel 130519100032 information will be printed on all Project materials, included on the Project web site (www.frontrangegp.com), and provides a single point of contact for all Project inquiries. If deemed necessary, additional community Open Houses or similar public meetings may be held to communicate important information and provide direct communication and dialogue between local stakeholders and Project leadership. Cureton understands that good stakeholder outreach is an ongoing commitment to keep the public at large, affected landowners, the market, and other interested parties informed about the Project status, and Cureton will seek to continue the relationships and dialogue built during the early stages of public interaction. 3.1.4 Communications Overview 3.1.4.1 Tentative Milestone Dates: Below are the tentative milestones that may trigger an intensified activity level of communications. • Initial Communications with County/Stakeholders • Weld County Planning Board Hearing • Weld County Board of County Commissioners Hearing • Mylar Recording • Construction - Start • Construction - Completion • In-Service/Operations Begin 3.1.4.2 Proposed Communication Vehicles The list of communication vehicles listed below are the various tools used to disseminate the Project information. • Briefing materials for elected and public officials • Cut sheets and Project information for use with all stakeholders • Website: www.frontrangegp.corm • Toll -free hotline: 1-833 CURETON (287-3866) • E-mail Address: info@curetonmidstream.com • Informal Public Forum (Pop-up display with company representatives) • Community Open House • Site Visits (as appropriate) 3.1.5 Certificate of Conveyances Per the USR Review Checklist Cureton enlisted Heritage Title Company to obtain a Certificate of Conveyances (COC). The COC form and all attachments are located in Appendix 0. 3.1.6 Property Owner List Per the USR Review Checklist Cureton compiled a list of all surrounding property owners (surface estate) within 500 feet of the property under consideration. The list was compiled utilizing the 15 CURETUN 'V MIDSTREAM Front Range Gas Plant Cureton Front Range LLC Lot B, RE -3799 Part of the PT S2NE4 19-2-64 (.91R) Parcel 130519100032 records of the Weld County assessor. The list and affidavit stating the list accuracy is located in Appendix H. 3.2 Construction 3.2.1 Access Permits Cureton has compiled an access permit application form for the single and main entrance to the proposed Plant. Currently there is not an existing access to the Plant site. The completed form with associated pictures is located in Appendix I. 3.2.2 Water Quality Storm water discharges associated with construction activities directly related to oil and gas exploration, production, processing and treatment operations or transmission facilities are regulated under Colorado Discharge Permit System Regulations (5CCR- 1002- 1) and require coverage under the ODDS General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activities (Permit No. COR-030000). Cureton Front Range is developing a Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP) in accordance with the regulation and permit. Cureton will be applying for a Storm Water Discharge Permit for Construction Activities through the Water Quality Control Division of CPDHE upon completion of the SWMP. The SWMP and Discharge Permit will be provided to the Weld County Health and Environmental Department upon approval of the permit and placed in Appendix.. 3.2.3 Air Quality Per Colorado Regulation No. 3, Part B, once construction permit(s) are issued or general construction permit registration submitted, Cureton can construct and operate the Plant as represented in the applications and registrations. Approved air permits will be placed in Appendix K upon receipt from the Division and provided to Weld County. 3.2.4 Biological, Cultural and Historical Resources Survey Cureton partnered with Terracon Consultants, Inc. to conduct a Desktop analysis of Parcel ##'s 130519100032, 130519100029. The study included an evaluation of Potential Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S., to include jurisdictional Wetlands, Protected Species, Sensitive Habitats, Cultural and Historical Resources. The analysis concluded that the proposed Plant would not have any impact on the subject areas listed above. A copy of this report can be found in Appendix L. 3.2.5 Traffic Per Section 2.4 of this document traffic volumes during operation of the Plant will be limited to employee vehicles and 2 to 3 roundtrips per day for tanker trucks/tandem trucks. Cureton has not included a traffic control plan per the pre -application meeting requirements. However, Cureton will respond to any feedback or requirements for the access from County Road 51 during the USR review process. 16 CURETUN 'V MIDSTREAM Front Range Gas Plant Cureton Front Range LLC Lot B, RE -3799 Part of the PT S2NE4 19-2-64 (.91R) Parcel 130519100032 3.2.6 Dust Abatement During peak phases of construction activities, Cureton will use or contract to use water trucks along County Road 51 for dust suppression and fugitive particulate emissions. Erosion and sediment controls will be maintained during construction to mitigate soil erosion and sedimentation which can contribute to dust. The disturbed areas of the site will be stabilized via hardscaping M. gravel) or landscaping in a timely manner to avoid soil exposure. Dust control will be utilized on all ingress and egress locations. The interior areas of the Plant site will be compacted and stabilized with gravel. If required Cureton will provide an ongoing dust suppression program for the Plant property. 3.3 Operations 33.1 Noise Evaluation and Abatement Plan Cureton has obtained a third party, Urban Solution Group (USG), to assist in obtaining ambient noise data collection at relative locations around the proposed project site. USG will proactively assess potential impacts from proposed equipment. Utilizing sound data and analysis USG will generate predicted impacts and noise attenuation recommendations. Cureton will take all necessary actions to comply with COGCC noise regulations. 3.3.1,1 Noise Survey and Theoretical Impacts Schedule The following highlights the three components of a comprehensive Noise Evaluation and Abatement Plan and proposed milestone dates for the Plant. 1. Ambient Noise Survey The intention of this survey is to understand the current ambient sound levels in relation to the proposed plant location prior to Cureton's proposed activity.. Noise measurements will be taken over a continuous 72 -hour period utilizing several monitoring locations strategically placed around the location. A weather station will be present during the data collection period that will continually record weather over the 72 -hour data collection period. USG will produce a report documenting the existing ambient noise levels in the area and identifying any spikes or outlying points in the data to ensure Cureton has a full understanding of the ambient noise levels at and surrounding the proposed plant, Ambient Noise Survey is proposed to be completed by 11/13/2017. 2. Noise Impact Assessment Cureton has commissioned USG to conduct a Noise Impact Assessment to proactively assess the potential noise impacts of the proposed Plant. Utilizing a combination of manufacture's sound pressure level data, file data previously measured units and lessons learned from historic projects, USG will produce a report predicting the environmental noise impact of the proposed facility. The Noise Impact Assessment will serve as the foundation to develop and evaluate noise control measures for the proposed plant. Cureton will take all necessary actions to comply with COGCC noise regulations. The Noise impact Assessment is proposed to be completed by 12/1/2017. . Noise Mitigation Plan The data from the Noise Impact Assessment will be used to calculate the proposed plant's sound level contribution at 350 feet or the fence line of the facility, whichever distance is greater per the Colorado Oil & Gas Commission (COGCC) 800 17 CURETUN 'V MIDSTREAM Front Range GaS Plant Cureton Front Range LLC Lot B, RE -3799 Part of the PT S2NE4 19-2-64 (.91R) Parcel 130519100032 Series Aesthetic and Noise Control and at the nearby residences. If noise control measures are warranted, USG will evaluate and propose potential noise mitigation measures. C u retort will take all necessary actions to comply with the COGCC noise regulations. The Noise Mitigation Plan, if applicable, will fo//ow the Noise Impact Assessment. Upon completion of the Noise Evaluation and Abatement Plan, the final documents will be placed in Appendix M as well as a submission to Weld County as applicable. 3.3.1.2 Noise Regulation and Attenuation Goals The proposed Plant is currently zoned Agricultural. Under current COGCC regulations, permissible noise levels cannot exceed 55dBA during the day or 50 dBA at night. 3.3.2 Lighting Cureton and the plant engineering design company UOP Russel are developing a lighting plan for the operations of the project site. The lighting plan looks at safe work practices for employees of the plant as well as adjacent home and landowner impacts. All lights on site will be down carted and shielded to ensure the footprint of the candle is contained within the area required to conduct work safely and mitigate any outside impacts. The lighting plan will be finalized and submitted with applicable building and site project design plans. 3. 3.3 Waste Management Cureton has included a Waste Management Plan in Appendix N. The plan contains general guidelines to Waste Management Practices at all Cureton facilities. 3.3.4 Air Quality Within 180 days of startup, Cureton will be required to self -certify that they are in compliance with all conditions of the construction permit prior to obtaining Final Approvals Upon startup of the Plant, Cureton will comply with all conditions of the permit including periodic monitoring and operating and maintenance plans as specified by the construction permits and general construction permits. 3.3..E Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasure Plan Per regulation 40 CFR Part 112 sites with a total above ground oil storage capacity of 1320 gallons or could reasonably be expected to discharge oil to navigable waters or adjoining shorelines in quantities that could be harmful must develop a Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasure Plan within 6 months of startup of the facility. The Plant is anticipated to exceed the 1320 -gallon threshold of the 40 CFR Part 112 and will develop an SPCC plan for the facility to be stamped by a Professional Engineer licensed in the State of Colorado. 3.3.6 Emergency Response Planning Cureton has developed an Emergency Response Plan for the proposed Plant. Included in the ERR is the Weld County Facility Emergency Action Plan. On 1O/27/2O17 Cureton provided the Weld County Office of Emergency Management a copy of the preliminary ERP for review and comment. Mr. Roy Rudisill provided preliminary feedback to Cureton on 10/27/2017and also sent the ERP to the Hudson Fire Protection District on 10/27/2017 for comment. Mr. Rudisill's comments are 18 CURETON 'V MIDSTREAM Front Range Gas Plant Cureton Front Range LLC Lot B, RE -3799 Part of the PT S2NE4 19-2-64 (.91R) Parcel 130519100032 incorporated into the ERP located in Appendix 0. Cureton did not hear back from the Hudson Fire Protection District prior to submittal of the USR Application. 19 CURETUN MIDSTREAM Front Range Gas Plant Cureton n Front Range LLC Lot B, RE -3799 Part of the PT S2NE4 19-2-64 (.91R) Parcel 130519100032 APPENDIX A Pre -Application Meeting Minutes Case File: PRE17-0245 20 MEMORANDUM TO: PRE 17-0245; Case File, pre -application DATE: September 14, 2017 FROM: Kris Ranslem, Planning Technician SUBJECT: Pre -Application Meeting prior to submitting USR for cyrogenic gas processing facility Attendees: Nick Holland, Cureton Midstream, LLC Mike Forney, Samuel Engineering Dale, Cureton Midstream, LLC Chris Gathman, Planning Hayley Balzano, Engineering Kris Ranslem, Planning Evan Pinkham, Public Works On Thursday, September 14, 2017 an informal discussion took place at the Greeley Administrative Offices Conference Room regarding a proposed cryogenic gas processing facility. (The legal description is Lot B RE - 3799; Part S2NE4 Section 19, T2N, R64W of the 6th P.M.) Background Information: Cureton Midstream, LLC will be utilizing approximately 60 acres of the site to install a cryogenic gas processing facility for the removal of natural gas liquids. The gas and liquids will be transported through pipelines to interstate pipelines. Operation of the facility will be 24/7. The applicants are proposing up to 6 to 8 employees on site, at any given time. A list of the proposed structures are listed in the pre -application materials. The applicant indicated that they expect to be operational September 2018. The applicants indicated that the southern parcel would be Phase I. There is no plan for additional expansion at this time; however, if there is additional expansion in the future they would like to design the site to have room for additional expansion. Building Department Building Permits will be required, per Section 29-3-10 of the Weld County Code. Currently the following has been adopted by Weld County: 2012 International Codes; 2006 International Energy Code; 2014 National Electrical Code. Effective January 2018, Weld County will adopt the 2017 National Electrical Code. A building permit application must be completed and two complete sets of engineered plans bearing the wet stamp of a Colorado registered architect or engineer must be submitted for review. A geotechnical engineering report or an open -hole inspection report performed by a registered State of Colorado engineer may be required for new structures and or additions. A complete code analysis prepared by a registered design professional may be required, and shall be submitted with Commercial Permit Applications to Weld County. A Fire District Notification letter may be required and shall be submitted with Commercial Permit applications. All building permit requirements can be found on the Weld County web -site: www.weldgov.comldepartmentslbuildinc lbuildin4 permit/permit applications/. Health Department Staff was unavailable; however please contact Ben Frissell at 970-400-2220 for further direction. Waste handling: Waste materials shall be handled, stored, and disposed in a manner that controls blowing debris, and other potential nuisance conditions. The applicant shall operate in accordance with Chapter 14, Article 1 of the Weld County Code. Please answer the following if applicable; indicate if there will be washing of vehicles or equipment, fuel storage, maintenance of vehicles or equipment, floor drains in shop, air emissions permit. Onsite dust: Fugitive dust should attempt to be confined on the property. Uses on the property should comply with the Colorado Air Quality Commission's air quality regulations. Sewage disposal information: Include in application how sewage disposal will be accommodated. If using a septic system provide a copy of the septic permit. Either utilize the County website www.co.weld.co.uslmaps/propertyportal/ or call (970-304-6415) or stop by EH front counter and request a copy. Potable water information: Include in application how potable water will be provided. Provide a will serve letter or water bill from the water district or provide a copy of well permit. Portable toilets and Bottled water can be used for employees and customers per policy below: TO DEFINE WHEN PORTABLE TOILETS AND COMMERCIALLY BOTTLED WATER ARE ALLOWED Purpose: To define when portable toilets and commercially bottled water are allowed. Policy: Bottled water from a commercial source is allowed in the following circumstances: 1. Temporary or seasonal uses that are utilized 6 months or less per year (for example recreational facilities, firework stands, farmers markets ) 2. Gravel mines 3. 10 or less customers or visitors per day And/or one of the following: 4. 2 or less full time (40 hour week) employees located on site 5. 4 or less part time (20 hour week) employees located on site 6. Employees or contractors that are on site for less than 2 consecutive hours a day Policy: portable toilets are allowed in the following circumstances: 1. Temporary or seasonal uses that are utilized 6 months or less per year (for example recreational facilities, firework stands, farmers markets ) 2. Gravel mines 3. 10 or less customers or visitors per day And/or one of the following: 4. 2 or less full time (40 hour week) employees located on site 5. 4 or less part time (20 hour week) employees located on site 6. Employees or contractors that are on site for less than 2 consecutive hours a day Public Works Latest ADT on CR 51 was taken on 6/4/2013 which counted 94 vpd with 35% trucks. County Road 51 is a gravel road and is designated on the Weld County Functional Classification Map (Code Ordinance 2017-01) as a(n) collector road, which requires 80 feet of right-of-way. The applicant shall delineate on the site map or plat the future and existing right-of-way and the physical location of the road. If the right-of- way cannot be verified it shall be dedicated. Pursuant to the definition of setback in the Weld County Code, Chapter 23, Article III, Section 23-3-50, the required setback is measured from the future right-of-way line. Be aware that physical roadways may not be centered in the right-of-way. This road is maintained by Weld County. County Road 20 is a section line road. Section line right-of-way does not exist in all sections in Weld County and should be verified before a decision to utilize it is made. Weld County corn monly refers to these as "Non - Maintained Section Line Right -of -Way." The existence of a physical road does not imply public right-of-way and the road may be located on private property. All right-of-way should be verified and physical roads located in relationship to the public right-of-way to ensure trespassing does not occur. The applicant shall verify the existing right-of-way and the documents creating the right-of-way and this information shall be noted on the site plan or plat. The applicant shall delineate on the site map or plat the existing right-of-way and physical location of roads to be used. If the right-of-way cannot be verified it shall be dedicated or an adequate easement between property owners shall be provided. Pursuant to the definition of setback in the Weld County Code, Chapter 23, Article III, Section 23-3-50, the required setback is measured from the future right- of-way line. Be aware that physical roadway many not be centered in the right-of-way. This road is NOT maintained by Weld County. Weld County will not replace overlapping easements located within existing right-of-way or pay to relocate existing utilities within the County right-of-way. ACCESS Table 12A.2 Minimum Access Spacing Criteria (Feet) Access Element Arterial Collector Local Distance between intersections Signalized Unsignalized 2,640 1,320 N/A 1,320 N/A 330 Distance between accesses and intersections 660 660 330 Distance between access joints 660 330 150 Distance between access points in subdivisions 660 330 75 Per Chapter 12, Article 5, Section 12-5-30, an Access Permit is required for access to Weld County maintained roadways. We strongly encourage you to discuss your access with public works prior to laying out your site plan to ensure the approved accesses are compatible with your layout. For new accesses and/or change of use of an existing access, the fee and photos are required (photo looking left and right along roadway from the access point and looking in to and out of the access point). These photos are used to evaluate the safety of the access location. Access permit instructions and application can be found at https://www.weldpov.com/departments/public works/permits/. Chapter 6, Sections 6.3, 6.4 and 6.5 of the Weld County Engineering and Construction Criteria offer access design guidance, which can be accessed at: https://www.weldgov.com/departments/public_ works/engineering/. Appendix 12-A of the county code can also be referenced. Existing access points with change of use or new access points may or may not be granted. Questions pertaining to access permits or access design shall be directed to the Public Works Department. Application Fee: temporary $75, single residential $75, small commercial $75, industrial $150, field $0, large commercial $150, subdivision $150. This can be accessed at: https://www.weldgov.com/departments/public works/engineering/. For shared accesses, Public Works strongly recommends the property owner establish an access road maintenance agreement so future owners of the properties will be aware of their requirements for shared maintenance of the access road. This is not a requirement for the recorded exemption but is recommended to avoid property owner conflicts in the future. Per Chapter 12, Appendix 12A.4.1 of the Weld County Code, an access approach that is gated shall be designed so that the longest vehicle (including trailers) using the access can completely clear the traveled way when the gate is closed. In no event, shall the distance from the gate to the edge of the traveled surface be less than 35 feet. Per Chapter 12, Appendix 12A.10.1, traffic volumes to the proposed facility may require the installation of a tracking control device and/or a minimum of four inches of compacted recycled asphalt or aggregate road base. Tracking control is required to prevent tracking from the site onto public roadways. Minimal standards are listed below. Temporary Tracking Control shall be used during construction unless permanent tracking control is installed ahead of construction activities. Less than 20 passenger vehicle round trips/day, no upfront tracking control requirements. As part of the development review process, all new commercial or residential developments will be required to submit a TIS that is prepared, stamped, and signed by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Colorado, unless the TIS is waived by Public Works. Traffic Narrative 1. Describe how many roundtrips/day are expected for each vehicle type: Passenger Cars/Pickups, Tandem Trucks, Semi-Truck/Trailer/RV (Roundtrip = 1 trip in and 1 trip out of site) 2. Describe the expected travel routes or haul routes for site traffic. 3. Describe the travel distribution along the routes (e.g. 50% of traffic will come from the north, 20% from the south, 30% from the east, etc.) 4. Describe the time of day that you expect the highest traffic volumes. Public Works will review the narrative and advise the applicant if more information or an engineered traffic study is required. Public Works may require an Improvements Agreement for one or all the following reasons: • Off -Site Public Improvements • Road Maintenance Agreement • Construction Maintenance Agreement • Access Improvements Agreement An Improvements Agreement is required for sites with required offsite improvements per Chapter 12, Article V, Section 12-5-60. Collateral is required to ensure the improvements are completed, and maintained. Improvements/Road Maintenance Agreement: An example agreement is available at: https://www.weldgov.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server5/File/Departments/Public%20Works/DevelopmentRevie w/sprusr.pdf. It will detail the approved haul route(s), outline when offsite improvements will be triggered, and include a maintenance agreement for the haul routes. Possible mitigations included in the road maintenance agreement may include but are not limited to: dust control, specified haul routes, damage repairs, and future improvement triggers. A Site Plan will be required identifying the following (if applicable): a Show and label location of existing road, existing road right-of-way, future road right-of-way, and easements a Show and label the unmaintained section line right-of-way Show and label location of the access(es) and label with access permit number Show and label the access turning radii (Residential - 25' Commercial - 60') a Show and label the approved tracking control Please contact the following staff regarding the following Public Works issues: Access Permits: Morgan Gabbert mgabbert@weldgov.com 970-400-3778 Improvements Agreements: Evan Pinkham epinkhamweldgov.com 970-400-3727 MS4 Areas: Lyndsay Holbrook lholbrook@weldgov.com 970-400-3788 Right -of -Way Permits: Amy Joseph ajoseph@weldgov.com 970-400-3764 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Weld County has recently adopted a new stormwater drainage code located under Chapter 23, Article 12 Storm Drainage Criteria. A list of professional engineering consultants is available if you need help finding an engineer to assist you with your project at the following link http://www.co.weld.co.us/Departments/PlanningZoning/Engineering.html. Please contact the Department of Planning Services/Development Review Engineering for questions or assistance 970-353-6100. This area IS within a Non -Urbanizing Drainage Area: Non -Urbanizing Drainage Areas generally require detention of runoff from the 1 -hour, 100 -year, storm falling on the developed site and release of the detained water at the historic runoff rate of the 1 -hour, 10 -year storm falling on the undeveloped site. Detention pond summarized in a drainage report is required unless the project falls under an exception to stormwater detention requirements per code section 23-12-30 F.1. To avoid holding up case processing, a minimum of either a preliminary drainage report or a drainage narrative with exception as shown below must be submitted with 7 -day case submittal information. Detention Pond Requirements: 1. A Drainage Report and Detention Pond Design shall be completed by a Colorado Licensed Professional Engineer and adhere to the drainage related sections of the Weld County Code. The Drainage Report must include a Certification of Compliance, stamped and signed by the PE, which can be found on the engineering website. A general Drainage Report Guidance Checklist is available on the engineering website. A Preliminary Drainage Report or a qualifying exception and Drainage Narrative shown below must be submitted for review at the time of the application. The applicants will be required to maintain the historic drainage flows and run-off amounts that exist from the property. A Weld County Grading Permit will be required if disturbing more than 1 acre. Grading Permit applications are accepted after the planning process is complete (map recorded). An Early Release Request Form may be entertained only after the applicant and Planning Department have reviewed the referral and surrounding property owner comments. The Early Release Request may or may not be granted depending on referral comments and surrounding property owner concerns. Contact an Engineering representative from the Planning Department for more information. Application Fees: 1-5 Acres/ $50, 5.1 - 20 Acres/$100, 20.1 Acres or Greater/$200 + $1 per acre over 20. A Construction Stormwater Permit is also required with the State for disturbing more than 1 acre. Contact: Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Water Quality Control Division, Rik Gay, 303-692- 3575. This site IS NOT in a Geologic Hazard Area. This site IS NOT in a FEMA regulatory floodplain. A Site Plan will be required identifying the following (if applicable): • Show and label location of drainage related features i.e. detention pond(s), ditches, etc... Detention ponds shall be labeled as "No Build/Storage Area" and include design volume • Show and label the drainage flow arrows showing how the stormwater flows across the property • Show and label the parking and traffic circulation flow arrows showing how the traffic moves around the property CONTACT INFORMATION Hayley Balzano Department of Planning Services Engineer hbalzanoweldgov.com 970-400-3552 Planning Department Additional fees may be included with the Building Permit such as Road Impact, County Facilities and Drainage fees. Please refer to the handout provided. Screening of the parking area or outdoor storage may be required from any adjacent landowners or public rights -of -way. Weld County has a Coordinated Planning Agreement (CPA) with the Town of Keenesburg. The Planning Director will contact the Town Manager to give notice of this pre -application meeting. Staff advised the applicants to contact Keenesburg regarding possible land use permitting including possible annexation. Please identify any proposed lighting or signs on the Site Plan. Lighting needs to be downcast and shielded. A 16sf sign is allowed in the Agricultural Zone District; however, if there are potentially any additional or larger signs please include those in the application. The facility will include a compressor component. Staff recommended that they review the 5MJUSRI7-83-542 application and record for landscaping and noise requirements. Staff recommended that the applicant contact the neighboring property owners prior to applying for the USR. The applicant indicated that they intended to do neighborhood outreach prior to submitting the application. Staff urged the applicant to contact staff for any questions: Planner On Call available Monday through Friday 7:30 a. m. to 4:30 p.m. or contact Chris Gathman at 970-400- 3537 or cgathmanweldgov.com The applicant may be eligible for the Small Business Incentive Program (SBIP). Staff provided information regarding the program. Please visit https://vvww.weldgov.com/departments/planning and zoning/small business incentive program/ or contact Michelle Martin at 970-400-3571 or Tom Parko at 970-400-3572, for further direction. Staff provided information on Colorado's Enterprise Zone (EZ) program which provides state income tax credits to encourage businesses to locate/expand in designated economically distressed areas of the state. The Weld County EZ program is administered by Upstate Colorado Economic Development. Staff explained the USR process. The applicant shall submit 1 packet for a 7 day completeness review. After the 7 day completeness review the applicant will be informed of what items are still required to make the application complete. Staff requested that the applicant submit the remaining material in electronic form. Upon submittal of a completed application it will be sent out for referral for 28 days. The applicant will then meet with their Planner to discuss the referrals and address as many of the referrals as possible. At that meeting the Planning Commission hearing will be scheduled. The Board of County Commissioners hearing typically follows approximately 3 weeks after the Planning Commission hearing. The above notes are provided as a courtesy to the applicant. While we strive to help identify as many potential issues upfront during the pre application meeting we cannot anticipate every issue that may come up during the formal application process. The information contained herein has been placed on file with the Department of Planning Services. The pre -application is valid for a period of one (1) year from the date of pre - application. If a formal application is not received following the time period specified herein the Planning Department reserves the right to require a new pre -application meeting. Please note that all land use, building and impact fees are subject to change throughout this time period. End memorandum. raj CURETUN 'V MIDSTREAM Front Range Gas Plant Cureton n Front Range LLC Lot B, RE -3799 Part of the PT S2NE4 19-2-64 (.91R) Parcel 130519100032 APPENDIX B Inter -Governmental Boundary - Meeting Notes and Notice of Inquiry 21 Nick Holland From: keenesburgclerk@rtebb.net Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 10:00 AM To: Torn Parka Cc: Nick Holland Subject: meeting per IGA Hi Tom, I wanted to let you know that we met with the folks from Cureton Midstream and discussed their upcoming project. They have fulfilled the IGA and met with us on September 19, 2017. The town has no objections to Cureton miovin forward with the county. Please contact me with any questions. Thank yout Debra Chum ley, CMCcbr> Town of Keenesburgcbr> 140 S. Main St. Keenesburg, CO  80643 303-732-4281<brtype="_moz" /> Keenesburg Meeting Tuesday, September 19, 2017 1:30 PM Location: Town Hall 140 S. Main Street Keenesburg, CO 80643 Attendees: Debra Chumley, Town Manager Kent Bruxvoort, Town Engineer Todd Hodges, Town Planner Marc Johns, Public Works Director & Board of Trustees Danny Kipp, Mayor Tom Beach, Fire Chief Cureton Representatives: Dale House Nick Holland Erica Jeung Meeting Notes: • Keenesburg is wondering how to categorize processing plant parcel for land use • Their permitting process is similar to Weld County, Todd will send over the permitting procedures • Hudson views sec. 19 2N64W as their jurisdiction according to Todd • May 2018 Keenesburg will be able to annex sec. 19 2N64W, after that 90 days to annex the parcel for Frontage Processing Plant, after that 2-3 month permitting process • Strongly encourage Cureton to use the pre -annexation application • Keenesburg offers a use by right permit which offers straight zoning • They would pay all permit fees if we annex • Fire District benefits include ISO rating 4, lower insurance, ambulance service, newer equipment and more staff • Chief Beach spent an entire day with Noble Energy the other day mapping out access to wells and other equipment • Chief Beach is good friends with Mr. Robertson, landowner of Frontage Processing Plant parcel. He coached his son in wrestling and he has known "Ricky" since high school. • Chief Beach mentioned that another benefit of annexing with Keenesburg is the county changes regulations all the time and Keenesburg won't, also the site plan and modifications to the plant if in Weld jurisdiction will be open to public hearing and if in Keenesburg it is handled all through the administration. • Water and sewer hook ups in the future at the site if it is annexed • Dale asked about tax abatement, they said they could look at that • They also brought up the Enterprise Zone tax relief talk to Cathy Schulte Senior VP of Upstate Colorado. • Assessor will set the tax valuation of the parcel, best to sit down with them and discuss early on • Discussed possibilities of permitting a lot instead of the whole parcel • Discussed possibilities of future annexation for plant expansions CURETON 'V MIDSTREAM Front Range Gas Plant Cureton Front Range LLC Lot B, RE -3799 Part of the PT S2NE4 19-2-64 (.91R) Parcel 130519100032 APPENDIX C USR Vicinity Map and Plot Plan 22 Weld County Public Works Dept. 1111 H Street P.O. Box 758 Greeley, CO €0532 Phone: (970)304-6496 Fax: (970)304-6497 Property Owner ACCESS PERMIT APPLICATION FORM Authorized Agent/Applicant (if different from Owner) Name Name Nicholas Holland Corn an Cureton Front Range LLC Company Cureton Front Range LLC p y p y Address 51817th Street Suite 650 Address 518 17th St. Suite 650 Denver CO 80202 Denver Co 80202 City State Zip City State zip 720-390-4555 Phone Fax E-mail nick.holland@curetonmidstream.com Phone 720-390-4506 Fax E- mail nicicholland@curetonmidstream.com Parcel Location The access is on WCR 51 ExistingCounty Road Surface Information Nearest Intersection: WCR 51 & WCR 20 Dist. from Intersection (approx. in ft.) 2300 Parcel Number(s) 130519100032, 130519100029 Section/Township/Range S19, T2N, R64 Total U of Existing Accesses to parcel None Proposed Use Temporary (Tracking Pad Required) (#) 1 o Small Commercial (If) -- Asphalt Gravel X Treated Other Proposed Access Information Culvert Size & Type (15" CI1P/RCP min.) 151 CMP Materials used to construct access GraveliRoadbase Access Construction Start Date Quarter 1 2018 Access Construction Finish Date Quarter 12018 o Single Residential (#) Oil & Gas (#) n Large Commercial (#) o Field (Agriculture Only) (#) ❑ Subdivision (#) o Industrial (#) Is this access associated with a Planning or Building Department Process? USR/MUSR XRECX/SUBX ❑ PUD ❑ WOGLA ❑ COMPLEX (IA required) o Other _ Planning/Building Department case ## Required Attached Documents - Traffic Control Plan (a generic plan can be found at https://www.weldgov.comidepartrnentsipublic wo rks/permits/I During the review process it may be determined that a right-of-way use permit will be required as well. - Certificate of Insurance (with 'Weld County, Colorado" listed as the certificate holder & as an additional insured) - Access Pictures (from the left, right, into & out of the access — N, 5, E, & W) - Access Authorization Form (Not required if the application is signed by the landowner.) Fee schedule (to be determined by permitting agency) - $75 each access point: Temporary, Small Commercial, Oil & Gas, Single Family Residential - $150 each access point: Industrial, Large Commercial, Subdivisions - Field (Agriculture only): no cost Parcel Sketch (or provide an aerial on an add'I sheet) = Existing Access A= Proposed Access T N cr 7 U 3 i Description of Work or Reason for Permit WCR rg WCR �a „is —a A 9746ba/ 4/* sk- ;33t) was J goomee Writ 4. /fete SS fin/00:4/C Strtile- iforsical „4C.e.xssPt;iiiette- spit;OaCtitly By accepting this permit, the undersigned Property Owner/Authorized Agent, under penalty of perjury, verifies they have received all pages of the permit application; they have read and understand all the permit requirements and provisions set forth on all pages. By virtue of their signature the Property Owne Authorized Agent is bound by and agrees to comply with all said permit requirements and provisions, all Wel•• Count i rdinan s, and state laws regarding access construction. Signature _- Printed Name re*/414Date Signature Printed Name Date (In case of multiple Property Owners/Authorized Agents) via • Access Permits are good for 1 year from the date of issuance. Property Owner/Authorized Agent must obtain a new permit or request an extension if the construction of the access point is not completed in that timeframe. • Extensions are subject to approval by Public Works • County regulations on road access can be found in Article V of Chapter 12 of the Weld County Code. CURETON MIDSTREAM, LLC 60 MMSCFD CRYOGENIC GAS PROCESSING PLANT ACCESS PERMIT PHOTOGRAPHS OCTOBER 27, 2017 Looking South raj CURETUN 'V MIDSTREAM Front Range Gas Plant Cureton n Front Range LLC Lot B, RE -3799 Part of the PT S2NE4 19-2-64 (.91R) Parcel 130519100032 APPENDIX L Air Permit Biological, Cultural and Historical Resources Survey 31 lierracon October 30, 2017 Mr. Nick Holland Cureton Midstream, LLC 518 17th Street, suite 650 Denver, CO 80202 E: nick.halland@curetonmidstream.com Re: Desktop Constraints Analysis Cureton Midstream, LLC Proposed Processing Plant Weld County, Colorado Terracon Project No. 25177624 Dear Mr. Holland: Terracon Consultants, Inc. (Terracon) appreciates the opportunity to provide Cureton Midstream, LLC (client) with the following Desktop Constraints Analysis (DCA) for the above -referenced project. This project was performed in accordance with the Work Order AFE-17-131211-1 dated October 17, 2017. 1.0 PROJECT INFORMATION 1.1 Site Description The study area (herein referred to as "site") is located in Weld County, Colorado and comprises approximately 46 acres (ac), which includes privately owned land. The site is the location of a proposed processing plant. The site consists primarily of farmland and open rangeland, with water drainage features, adjacent water bodies, center -pivot irrigation systems, numerous irrigation canals, and paved and unimproved roads. A Geographic Information System (GIS) has been created for the project, that shows all relevant features evaluated in this DCA. The GIS can be accessed online at: https:llportal.qis.terracon.cam/Login/ 'project=CuretonMidstream 25177593 The project is located in Section 19 of Colorado Township 1 North, Range 65 West. The approximate latitude/longitude of the center of the site is 40.126609' North, -104.586650" West. Elevation of the site is 4935 feet (ft) above sea level. 2.0 CONSTRAINTS ANALYSIS This DCA was requested to assist the client with identifying specific issues that could render the site either economically unfeasible for development or that would pose an unacceptable level of risk, in the client's opinion, for development to be pursued. Terracon Consultants, Inc. 2704 S Prairie Ave., Pueblo, Colorado 81005 P [719] 545-3448 terracon.com Environmental S Facilities S Ceotec n ca(F S Materials. Desktop Constraints Analysis — Proposed Processing Plant Cureton Midstream LLC Project • Weld County, CO October 30, 2017 • Terracon Project No. 25177624 lierracon To complete the DCA, Terracon performed a limited evaluation of the following four subjects, which are discussed in Sections 2.1 through 2.4: 1) Potential Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S., Including Wetlands 2) Protected Species (e.g., Threatened and Endangered Species) 3) Sensitive Habitats, Wildlife Areas, and Refuges 4) Section 106 - National Historic Preservation Act As presented in the following sections, each of these five categories were reviewed for each Township/Range/Section. 2.1 Potential Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S., Including Wetlands Terracon conducted a limited desktop review for the site to evaluate potential presence of apparent jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. (WOTUS), including wetlands, as defined and regulated by federal authority under 33 CFR Parts 320-330. Wetlands as defined by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), in the Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands, (Federal Interagency Committee for Wetland Determination, 1989), are "those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions." Jurisdictional wetlands are regulated under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)I1972, Clean Water Act of 1977 and 1987, and the Farm Bills of 1985 and 1990. Terracon reviewed the following resources to evaluate the potential presence of jurisdictional WOTUS, including suspected wetlands, on the project site: Topographic Map and Aerial Image Review The USGS 7.5 -Minute Topographic Quadrangle map of the project site was reviewed to identify drainages or other potential WOTUS within the project site. Numerous unnamed ephemeral and intermittent drainages are located in surrounding farm fields, including lands immediately west of the site. No drainages or surface water features are located on -site. Ephemeral drainages flow less than intermittent drainages, and typically flow following periods of high precipitation. Intermittent streams are also temporary and typically carry water during certain portions of the year. There are no perennial streams within or near the project area. Adjacent canals and ditches, which feed irrigation water from the South Platte River to farmland, should be avoided during construction of the site, if possible. Typically, man-made irrigation ditches are not considered jurisdictional under Section 404 of the CWA. Responsive ■ Resourceful • Reliable 2 Desktop Constraints Analysis — Proposed Processing Plant Cureton Midstream LLC Project • Weld County, CO October 30, 2017 • Terracon Project No. 25177624 lierracon National Wetlands Inventory Map National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) data for the site was reviewed to identify potential wetland/waterbody areas. NWI data for the project site was published by the U.S. Department of the Interior's (DOI) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and depicts possible wetland areas and waterbodies based on stereoscopic analysis of high altitude aerial photographs. The NWI data and aerial image show one suspect pond and drainage west of the site, but no NWI features are located on -site. Management Recommendations No wetland features were identified on -site based on aerial photography review and evaluation of potential NWI features. Therefore, based on limited desktop information, additional site survey or permitting does not appear to be required to address potential WOTUS at the site. If wetlands or waterbodies are encountered during future field observations and/or construction of the site, Terracon recommends a formal delineation of potential features that may be regulated under Section 404 of the CWA. 2.2 Protected Species Federally Listed Threatened and Endangered Species Terracon searched available data from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Information, Planning and Conservation System (IPaC) Endangered Species Act species list to identify species of concern determined by the activities proposed at the project site (Attachment A). Based on a review of the website, nine federally protected species are listed as potentially occurring in Weld County. These species are listed below:1 Taxon Name Species Habitat Federal Status Listing Mammals Preble's mouse meadow jumping (Zapus hudsonius preblei) Riparian, Front Range foothills Threatened Birds Least tern (Sterna antillarum) Limited corridor to of the eastern South Platte Colorado Endangered Birds Mexican spotted occidental's owl lucida) (Stria Pine forest foothills, Mountains Rocky Threatened Birds Piping plover (Charadrius melodus) Limited to corridor of the eastern South Platte Colorado Threatened Birds Whooping crane (Grus americana) North Platte, South Platte Rivers Endangered Fishes Pallid sturgeon (Scaphirhynchus albus) North Platte, South Platte Rivers Endangered 1 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2017. Information, Planning, and Conservation System (IPaC). Threated and Endangered Species Trusted Resource List for Weld County, CO. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Accessed at: http://ecos.fws.gov/ipacl Responsive ■ Resourceful • Reliable 3 Desktop Constraints Analysis — Proposed Processing Plant Cureton Midstream LLC Project • Weld County, CO October 30, 2017 • Terracon Project No. 25177624 lierracon Taxon Name Species Habitat Federal Listing Status Plants Colorado butterfly neornexicana coloradoensis) plant (Laura var. Subirrigated, deposited) alluvial (stream soils Threatened Plants Ute ladies' (Spiranthes -tresses orchid diluvialis) Riparian meadows Threatened Plants Western (Platanthera prairie fringed orchid praeclara) North Platte, South Platte Rivers Threatened Habitats for the listed species were compared to desktop aerial imagery for the project site. The project site consists primarily of native shortgrass prairie rangeland and irrigation farmland. Riparian areas may exist in the vicinity of the irrigation canals/intermittent/ephemeral drainages; therefore, these areas may contain habitat for the Ute ladies' -tresses orchid and Colorado butterfly plant. No habitat exists within the proposed plant site support the other listed species. Surveys for these two plants should be conducted (May/June) prior to site construction, if riparian habitats are affected. The Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918 (META) decrees that migratory birds and their parts (including eggs, nests, and feathers) are federally protected. The MBTA is the domestic law that affirms, or implements, the United States' commitment to four international conventions (with Canada, Japan, Mexico, and Russia) for the protection of a shared migratory bird resource. Each of the conventions protect selected species of birds that are common to these countries (i.e., they occur in these countries at some point during their annual life cycle). Certain birds are protected under the MBTA and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. Activities that result in a take of migratory birds or eagles is prohibited unless permitted and authorized by the USEWS. In Colorado, guidance is available that specifies temporal and spatial buffers for raptors and eagles2 (Attachment B). These buffers should be applied during construction of the site, if possible. The following 16 migratory birds of concern were identified within the vicinity of the project site on the IPaC: Species Name SeasonalOccurrence in Project Area Buff -breasted Sandpiper (Tryngites subruficollis) Breeds elsewhere* Burrowing Owl (Athene cunicularia) Breeds March 15 to August 31 Cassin's Sparrow (Aimophila cassinii) Breeds August 1 to October 10 Chestnut -collared Longspur (Calcarius ornatus) Breeds May 1 to August 10 Golden Eagle (Aquila chrysaetos) Breeds April 1 to August 31 Hudsonian Godwit (Limosa Breeds elsewhere haemastica) Lark Bunting (Calamospiza Breeds May 10 to August 15 melanocorys) 2 https://cpw.state.co.us/Documents/WildlifeSpecies/Livinq'WithWildlife/RaptorBufferGuidelines2008.pdf Responsive ■ Resourceful • Reliable 4 Desktop Constraints Analysis — Proposed Processing Plant Cureton Midstream LLC Project • Weld County, CO October 30, 2017 • Terracon Project No. 25177624 lierra con Species Name Seasonal Occurrence in Project Area Lesser Yellowlegs (Tringa avipes) Breeds elsewhere Lewis's Woodpecker (Melanerpes lewis) Breeds April 20 to September 30 Long -billed Curlew (Numenius americanus) Breeds April 1 to July 31 Mccown's Longspur (Calcarius mccownii) Breeds May 1 to August 15 Mountain Plover (Charadrius montanus) Breeds April 15 to August 15 Semipalmated Sandpiper (Calidris pusilla) Breeds elsewhere Sprague's Pipit (Anthus spragueii) Breeds elsewhere (Numenius phaeopus) Breeds elsewhere Whimbrel Willow Flycatcher (Empidonax traillii) Breeds May 20 to August 31 *Species that breed elsewhere do not nest locally, but may be present either during migration or during summer range occupancy. It is not anticipated that migratory birds will pose a significant constraint to project site development; however, migratory bird nest surveys would be required to evaluate the potential for the presence of avian species protected by the MBTA. Terracon recommends that portions of the site be evaluated for nesting ground birds and prairie dogs. Certain MBTA-listed species, such as the burrowing owl and mountain plover, are commonly found within prairie dog towns. Additionally, numerous raptor nests may be located near or adjacent to the site. Mature trees and hedgerows/windbreaks are located adjacent to the site that may contain active raptor nests. No bald eagle nests are located near the site. The USFWS typically recommends that development occur outside the peak migratory bird/raptor nesting season. Buffers for raptors that may be present in the project area are provided in Attachment B. Below is a list of species and/or habitats that may occur within or adjacent to the site: Section 19 • Black tailed prairie dog overall range • Canada geese overall range • Mule deer overall range • Ring neck pheasant overall range • Potential raptor nests in hedgerows/windbreaks 2.3 Sensitive Habitats, Wildlife Areas and Refuges Terracon reviewed available databases from the USFWS IPaC to evaluate whether the project site is within identified sensitive habitats, wildlife areas, and refuges. Based on the available documentation, the proposed undertaking is not located in an area identified as sensitive habitat, a wildlife area and/or a refuge. There are no wildlife refuges or fish Responsive ■ Resourceful • Reliable 5 Desktop Constraints Analysis — Proposed Processing Plant Cureton Midstream LLC Project • Weld County, CO October 30, 2017 • Terracon Project No. 25177624 lrerracon hatcheries indicated within the site vicinity. Therefore, this issue is not considered a constraint to development of the site. 2.4 Section 106 - National Historic Preservation Act Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) applies to projects with a federal nexus. Terracon understands that there is no federal involvement in the project at this time. If a federal nexus is identified, the completion of a Cultural Resources Survey would be a potential requirement for meeting Section 106 compliance obligations. Terracon reviewed the Colorado Historical Society -Office of Archaeology and Historical Preservations Colorado's on-line Cultural Resource Database (Compass) for eligible or listed National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) resources located within a mile of the project and within the project boundary. The Compass website indicates there are no known NRHP-field eligible properties within the project boundary. The Compass search resulted in one historic archaeological resource and two previous surveys within a one mile radius of the project area. Based on review of Google Earth, the project is located on agricultural land. The historic topographic map has the project boundary running along a historic private road at the southern border of the area (Quad Keenesburg, CO 1950). Based on the historic aerial from 1948, a structure, likely an agricultural outbuilding, was present in the southwestern area of the project boundary. The absence of recorded historic properties or archaeological sites does not mean such resources are not present within project boundary. Historic archaeological resources could exist around the location of the structure identified in the 1948 aerial. To more accurately evaluate potential presence of cultural resources within the project boundary, a Cultural Resources Survey should be completed to identify cultural resources, archaeological sites, and historic properties, to assess them for NRHP eligibility, and to evaluate whether historic properties may be affected by the proposed project. 3.0 SUMMARY The following is a summary of Terracon's opinion on each subject and related recommendations: • Potential Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S., Including Wetlands: At this desktop review level, it appears that the size of the site, relative to the areas indicated as potentially jurisdictional, would allow development by avoidance of the potentially jurisdictional WOTUS. The exception to this is an ephemeral drainage and potential pond/wetland immediately west of the site. For these areas, Terracon recommends that the Client conduct a WOTUS delineation or USACE pre -construction notification only if these areas may be affected by the project. At this time, it appears that the project site boundaries will not impact these potential WOTUS features. Local irrigation/water districts should be contacted if the project disturbs irrigation canals. Responsive ■ Resourceful • Reliable 6 Desktop Constraints Analysis — Proposed Processing Plant Cureton Midstream LLC Project • Weld County, CO October 30, 2017 • Terracon Project No. 25177624 lierracon • Protected Species: Terracon searched available data from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USEWS) Information, Planning and Conservation System (IPaC) Endangered Species Act species list (Attachment A) to identify species of concern determined by the activities proposed at the site. No federally listed threatened or endangered species appear to be impacted by this proposed project. The site is located in an irrigated farm field that has previously been disturbed and contains little natural habitat. It is not anticipated that migratory birds will pose a significant constraint to site development; however, a migratory bird nest survey may be warranted to evaluate the presence or absence of species protected by the META during the breeding/nesting season (generally March through August, Attachment B). If the site is cleared outside the nesting season, then a survey is not necessary. The USEWS typically recommends that development occur outside the peak migratory bird nesting season. • Sensitive Area, Wildlife Habitats and Refuges: Based on the available documentation, the proposed project is not located in an area identified as sensitive habitat, a wildlife area and/or a refuge. No further work is recommended for this review item. • Section 106 -National Historic Preservation Act: The Compass website indicates there are no known NRHP-field eligible properties within the project boundary. The Compass search resulted in one historic archaeological resource and two previous surveys within a one mile radius of the project area. Based on review of Google Earth, the project is located on agricultural land. The historic topographic map has the project boundary running along a historic private road at the southern border of the area (Quad Keenesburg, CO 1950). Based on the historic aerial from 1948, a structure, likely an agricultural outbuilding, was present in the southwestern area of the project boundary. Terracon recommends a Cultural Resources Survey be completed at the site to identify cultural resources, archaeological sites, and historic properties, and to evaluate whether historic properties may be affected by the proposed project. 4.0 LIMITATIONS This scope of services is preliminary in nature. It is performed solely from a review of available public information. Normally, interviews are not conducted, regulatory agency personnel are not contacted or consulted, a site reconnaissance is not performed, samples are not obtained, and no form of site or laboratory testing is completed. Therefore, the term "Desktop" strictly applies. However, Terracon may contact the local agency having jurisdiction concerning land use and permitting schedule questions. This should be considered a screening exercise to aid in the site selection process only. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made and use of this report is subject to the terms, including reliance, expressed in the contractual agreement between the client and Terracon. Responsive ■ Resourceful • Reliable 7 Desktop Constraints Analysis — Proposed Processing Plant Cureton Midstream LLC Project • Weld County, Co October 30, 2017 • Terracon Project No. 25177624 5.0 CLOSING lierracon Terracon appreciates the opportunity to provide this DCA letter report to Cureton Midstream, LLC. Should you have questions, please feel free to contact us. Sincerely, Terracon Consultants, Inc. ?Aaron Maier lateral Resources Program Manager Attachments A and B A. USFWS IPaC Report B. Colorado Raptor Buffer Guidance Jeremy Hanz Senior Associate/APR licensed in Texas Responsive ■ Resourceful • Reliable 8 ATTACHMENT A USFWS IPAC Report 10/30/2017 IPaC: Explore Location IPaC U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service IPaC resource list This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat (collectively referred to as trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS) jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced below. The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that could potentially be directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood and extent of effects a project may have on trust resources typically requires gathering additional site - specific (e.g., vegetation/species surveys) and project -specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of proposed activities) information. Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS office(s) with jurisdiction in the defined project area. Please read the introduction to each section that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section. Location Weld County, Colorado Local office Colorado Ecological Services Field Office 4 (303) 236-4773 1� (303) 236-4005 MAILING ADDRESS Denver Federal Center P.O. Box 25486 Denver, CO 80225-0486 PHYSICAL ADDRESS 134 Union Boulevard, Suite 670 Lakewood, CO 80228-1807 http://www.tws.gov/colo rado ES http://www.tws.goviplatteriver https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/B4JKFDM3C)ZHZNK2JFY2R55EYOM/resources 1/7 10/30/2017 IPaC: Explore Location Endangered species This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of project level impacts. The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species. Additional areas of influence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of the species range if the species could be indirectly affected by activities in that area (e.g., placing a dam upstreamof a fish population, even if that fish does not occur at the dam site, may indirectly impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow downstream). Because species can move, and site conditions can change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the project area. To fully determine any potential effects to species, additional site -specific and project -specific information is often required. Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted, funded, or licensed by any Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list which fulfills this requirement can only be obtained by requesting an official species list from either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC (see directions below) or from the local field office directly. For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC website and request an official species list by doing the following: 1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE. 2. Click DEFINE PROJECT. 3. Log in (if directed to do so). 4. Provide a name and description for your project. 5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST. Listed species1 are managed by the Ecological Services Program of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. a 1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also shows species that are candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for more information. The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location: Mammals NAME Preble's Meadow Jumping Mouse Zapus hudsonius preblei There is final critical habitat for tfis species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. https://ec os.fws.gov/e cp/species/4090 Birds NAME Least Tern Sterna antillarum I his species only needs to be considered if the following concitior applies: + Water -related activities/use in the N_ Plate. 5_ Plate dud Larcrr!ie River Basins may affect listed species it Nebraska. No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/85C5 "kJ STATUS Threatened STATUS Endangered Mexican Spotted Owl Strix occidentalis lucida Threatened There is final critical habitat for ti -is species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8196 Piping Plover Charadrius melodus This species only needs to be considered if the following condition applies: * Water -related activities/use in the N. Platte, S. Platte and Laramie River Basins may affect listed species in Nebraska. There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. https://ecos.fws.gov/e cp/species/6039 Whooping Crane Grus americana This species only needs to be considered if the following condition applies: • Water -related activities/use in the N. Platte, S. Platte and Laramie River Basins may affect listed species in Nebraska. There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. https://ecos.fws.gov/e cp/s pe ci es/7'58 Threatened Endangered https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/B4JKFDM3CZHZNK2JFY2R55EYOM/resources 2/7 10/30/2017 IPaC: : Explore Location Fishes NAME STATUS Pallid Sturgeon Scaphirhynchus albus This species only needs to be considered if the following condition applies: • Water -related activities/use in the N. Platte, S. Platte and Laramie River Basins may affect listed species in Nebraska. No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/e cp/speci es/7162 Flowering Plants Endangered NAME STATUS Colorado Butterfly Plant Gaura neomexicana var. coloradensis There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. https://ecos.fws.govfe cp/species/6110 Ute Ladies' -tresses Spiranthes diluvialis No critical habitat has been designated for this species. htt n:l/ecos_tots,guviecp/species/2159 Western Prairie Fringed Orchid Platanthera praeclara This species only neecs to be considered if the fallowing concitior applies: 4 Water -related activities/use in the N. Platte, S. Platte and Laramie River Basins may affect listed species in Nebraska. No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/e cp/species/ 1669 Critical habitats Threatened Threatened Threatened Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered species themselves. I THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS AT THIS LOCATION. Migratory birds Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act- and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act:l. Any activity that results in the take Ito harass, harm, pursue, hunt,, shoot.,.. wound,.. kill, trapi,. captures or collect., or,to..attempt to engage in any such conduct) of migratory birds or eagles is prohibited unless authorized by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service* There are no provisions for allowing the take of migratory birds that are unintentionally killed or injured. Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in the take of migratory birds is responsible for complying with the appropriate regulations and implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below. 1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918. 2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940. 3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a) Additional information can be found using the following links: • Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/ birds-of-conservation-concern.php • Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/project-assessment-tools-and-guidance/ conservation-measures.php • Nationwide conservation measures for birds http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/pdf/management/nationwidestandardconservationmeasures.pdf The birds listed below are USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern that might be affected by activities in this location. The list does not contain every bird you may find in this location, nor is it guaranteed that all of the birds on the list will be found on or near this location. To get a better idea of the specific locations where certain species have been reported and their level of occurrence, please refer to resources such as the E -bird data mapping tool (year-round bird sightings by birders and the general public) and Breeding Bird Survey (relative abundance maps for breeding birds). Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, special attention should be given to the birds on the list below. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your project area, visit the E -bird Explore Data Tool. NAME BREEDING SEASON Buff -breasted Sandpiper Tryngites subruficallis Breeds elsewhere https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/B4JKFDM3QZHZNK2JFY2R55EYOM/resources 3/7 10/30/2017 IPaC: : Explore Location Burrowing Owl Athene cunicularia https://ecos.fws.gov/e cp/speci es/9737 Cassin's Sparrow Aimophila cassinii https://ecos.fws.gov/e cp/speci es/9512 Chestnut -collared Longspur Calcarius ornatus Golden Eagle Aquila ch.rysaetos https:I/eros.fws.gov/e cp/species/1680 Hudsonian Godwit Limosa haemastica Lark Bunting Calamospiza melanocorys Lesser Yellowlegs Tringa flaviipes https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9679 Lewis's Woodpecker Melanerpes lewis http5 :// e cos.tws.gov/e cw/species/9408 Long -billed Curlew Numenius americanus https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5511 Mccown's Longspur Calcarius mccownii i i https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9292 Mountain Plover Charadrius montanus https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3638 Semipalmated Sandpiper Calidris pusilla Sprague's Pipit Anthus spragueii http://ec os.tws_gov/e cp/spenes/8964 Whimbrel Numenius phaeopus https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9483 Willet Tringa semipalmata 4 Willow Flycatcher Empidonax traillii https://ecossfots.goviecp/species/3482 Probability of Presence Summary Breeds Mar 15 to Aug 31 Breeds Aug 1 to Oct 10 Breeds May 1 to Aug 10 Breeds Apr 1 to Aug 31 Breeds elsewhere Breeds May 10 to Aug 15 Breeds elsewhere Breeds Apr 20 to Sep 30 Breeds Apr 1 to Jul 3.1 Breeds May 1 to Aug 15 SIS1/4000\1411‘Breeds Apr 15 to Aug 15 Breeds elsewhere Breeds elsewhere Breeds elsewhere Breeds Apr 20 to Aug 5 Breeds May 20 to Aug 31 The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Probability of Presence ( ) Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in your project's counties during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4 -week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high. How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps: 1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is 0.25. 2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.0510.25 = 0.2. 3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of presence score. To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar. https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/B4JKFDM3CZHZNK2JFY2R55EYOM/resources 4/7 10/30/2017 IPaC: Explore Location Breeding Season ( ) Yellow bars denote when the bird breeds in the Bird Conservation Region(s) in which your project lies. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project area. Survey Effort (I ) Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys performed for that species in the counties of your project area. The number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys. To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar. No Data (-) A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week. Survey Timeframe Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant information. SPECIES JAN Buff -breasted Sandpiper Burrowing Owl Cassin's Sparrow Chestnut -collared Longspur Golden Eagle Hudsonian Godwit Lark Bunting Lesser Yellow legs Lewis's Woodpecker Long -billed Curlew Mccown's Longspur Mountain Plover 51'tUE5 Semipalmated Sandpiper Sprague's Pipit w Whirri'brel Willet Willow Flycatcher JAN • FEB probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG Ii APR 03. iF i 1 MAY i tek SEP OCT taw TIh* I - Nov DEC 4404, LIIL -I-- w I ii JUN Ju i Auu I NUV LEL • Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds. Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at any location year round. Such measures are particularly important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. To see when birds are most likely to occur in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Special attention should be made to look for nests and avoid nest destruction during the breeding season. The best information about when birds are breeding can be found in Birds of North America (BNA' Online under the "Breeding Phenology" section of each species profile. Note that accessing this information may require a subscription. Additional measures and/or permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species present on your project site. What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location? The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that might be affected by activities in your project location. These birds are of priority concern because it has been determined that without additional conservation actions, they are likely to become candidates for listing under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets. The AKN list represents all birds reported to be occurring at some level throughout the year in the counties in which your project lies. That list is then narrowed to only the Birds of Conservation Concern for your project area. https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/B4JKFDM3QZHZNK2JFY2R55EYOM/resources 5/7 10/30/2017 IPaC: Explore Location Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list only includes species of particular priority concern, and is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. Although it is important to try to avoid a n d minimize impacts to all birds, special attention should be made to avoid and minimize impacts to birds of priority concern. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the E -bird Explore Data Tool. What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location? The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AK Na. This data is derived from a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets. Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my project area? To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or year-round), you may refer to the following resources: The The Cornell Lab of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or (if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds guide, If a bird entry on your migratory bird species list indicates a breeding season, it is probable the bird breeds in your project's counties at some point within the time -frame specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area. Facilities Wildlife refuges Any activity proposed on National Wildlife Refuge lands must undergo a 'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to discuss any questions or concerns. THERE ARE NO REFUGES AT THIS LOCATION. Fish hatcheries THERE ARE NO FISH HATCHERIES AT THIS LOCATION. Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes. delitn For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local I.I.S. Army Corps of Engineers District. %fist Naker, THERE ARE NO KNOWN WETLANDS AT THIS LOCATION. Data Iimitativns itilli I he Service's objective of rrapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level information on the location, type and size of these resources. I he maps are prepared fron. the analysis of high altitude imagery_ Wetlands are identifiec based on vegetation, visible hydrology anc geography_ A margin of error is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any particular site may result in revision of the wetlanc boundaries or classification established through image analysis. The accuracy of image interpretatior depercs or the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts, the amount and cuality of the collateral data and the amourt of ground truth verification work conducted. Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery usec and any mapping problems. Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There may be occasional differences in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted on the map and the actual conditions on site. Data exclusions Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal waters. Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded from the inventory. These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery. Data precautions Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe wetlands in a different manner than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt in either the design or products of this inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local government or to establish the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons intending to engage in activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate federal, state, or local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may affect such activities. https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/B4JKFDM3QZHZNK2JFY2R55EYOM/resources 6/7 ATTACHMENT B COLORADO RAPTOR BUFFER GUIDANCE RECOMMENDED BUFFER ZONES AND SEASONAL RESTRICTIONS FOR COLORADO RAPTORS Tolerance limits to disturbance vary among as well as within raptor species. As a general rule, Ferruginous Hawks and Golden Eagles respond to human activities at greater distances than do Ospreys and America Kestrels. Some individuals within a species also habituate and tolerate human activity at a proximity that would cause the majority of the group to abandon their nests. Other individuals become sensitized to repeated encroachment and react at greater distances. The tolerance of a particular pair may change when a mate is replaced with a less tolerant individual and this may cause the pair to react to activities that were previously ignored. Responses will also vary depending upon the reproductive stage. Although the level of stress is the same, the pair may be more secretive during egg laying and incubation and more demonstrative when the chicks hatch. The term "disturbance" is ambiguous and experts disagree on what actually constitutes a disturbance. Reactions may be as subtle as elevated pulse rate or as obvious as vigorous defense or abandonment. Impacts of disturbance may not be immediately evident. A pair of raptors may respond to human intrusion by defending the nest, but well after the disturbance has passed, the male may remain in the vicinity for protection rather than forage to feed the nestlings. Golden eagles rarely defend their nests, but merely fly a half mile or more away and perch and watch. Chilling and over heating of eggs or chicks and starvation of nestlings can result from human activities that appeared not to have caused an immediate response. A `holistic' approach is recommended when protecting raptor habitats. While it is important for land managers to focus on protecting nest sites, equal attention should focus on defining important foraging areas that support the pair's nesting effort. Hunting habitats of many raptor species are extensive and may necessitate interagency cooperation to assure the continued nest occupancy. Unfortunately, basic knowledge of habitat use is lacking and may require documentation through telemetry investigations or intensive observation. Telemetry is expensive and may be disruptive so a more practical approach is to assume that current open space is important and should be protected. Although there are exceptions, the buffer areas and seasonal restrictions suggested here reflect an informed opinion that if implemented, should assure that the majority of individuals within a species will continue to occupy the area. Additional factors, such as intervening terrain, vegetation screens, and thecumulative impacts of activities should be considered. These guidelines were originally developed by CDOW raptor biologist Gerald R. Craig (retired) in December 2002. To provide additional clarity in guidance, incorporate new information, and update the conservation status of some species, the guidelines were revised in January 2008. Further revisions of this document may become necessary as additional information becomes available. RECOMMENDED BUFFER ZONES AND SEASONAL RESTRICTIONS BALD EAGLE Nest Site: No surface occupancy (beyond that which historically occurred in the area; see `Definitions' below) within 'A mile radius of active nests (see `Definitions' below). Seasonal restriction to human encroachment (see `Definitions' below) within % mile radius of active nests from October 15 through July 3L This closure is more extensive than the National Bald Eagle Management Guidelines (USFWS 2007) due to the generally open habitat used by Colorado's nesting bald eagles. 'inter Night Roost: No human encroachment from November 15 through March 15 within A mile radius of an active winter night roost (see `Definitions' below) if there is no direct line of sight between the roost and the encroachment activities. No human encroachment from November 15 through March 15 within V2 mile radius of an active winter night roost if there is a direct line of sight between the roost and the encroachment activities. If periodic visits (such as oil well maintenance work) are required within the buffer zone after development, activity should be restricted to the period between 1000 and 1400 hours from November 15 to March 15. Hunting Perch: Diurnal hunting perches (see `Definitions' below) associated with important foraging areas should also be protected from human encroachment. Preferred perches may be at varying distances from human encroachment and buffer areas will vary. Consult theColorado Division of Wildlife for recommendations for specific hunting perches. GOLDEN EAGLE Nest Site: No surface occupancy (beyond that which historically occurred in the area) within /4 mile radius of active nests. Seasonal restriction to human encroachment within !/2 mile radius of active nests from December 15 through July 15. OSPREY Nest Site: No surface occupancy (beyond that which historically occurred in the area) within 'A mile radius of active nests. Seasonal restriction to human encroachment within '1/4 mile radius of active nests from April 1 through August 31. Some osprey populations have habituated and are tolerant to human activity in the immediate vicinity of their nests. FERRUGINOUS HAWK Nest Site: No surface occupancy (beyond that which historically occurred in the area) within 1A mile radius of active nests. Seasonal restriction to human encroachment within 'f2 mile radius of active nests from February 1 through July 15. This species is especially prone to nest abandonment during incubation if disturbed . RED-TAILED HAWK Nest Site: No surface occupancy (beyond that which historically occurred in the area) within 1/3 mile radius of active nests. Seasonal restriction to human encroachment within 1/3 mile radius of active nests from February 15 through July 15. Some members of this species have adapted to urbanization and may tolerate human habitation to within 200 yards of their nest. Development that encroaches on rural sites is likely to cause abandonment. SWAINSON'S HAWK Nest Site: No surface occupancy (beyond that which historically occurred in the area) within 1 mile radius of active nests. Seasonal restriction to human encroachment within Vt mile radius of active nests from April 1 through July 15. Some members of this species have adapted to urbanization and may tolerate human habitation to within 100 yards of their nest. PEREGRINE FALCON Nest Site: No surface occupancy (beyond that which historically occurred in the area) within 1/4 mile radius of active nests. Seasonal restriction to human encroachment within 1/2 mile of the nest cliff(s) from March 15 to July 31. Due to propensity to relocate nest sites, sometimes up to '/ mile along cliff faces, it is more appropriate to designate 'Nesting Areas' that encompass the cliff system and a A mile buffer around the cliff complex. PRAIRIE FALCON Nest Site: No surface occupancy (beyond that which historically occurred in the area) within ''2 mile radius of active nests. Seasonal restriction to human encroachment within !/2 mile radius of active nests from March 15 through July 15. NORTHERN GOSHAWK No surface occupancy (beyond that which historically occurred in the area) within ''2 mile radius of active nests. Seasonal restriction to human encroachment within !/2 mile radius of active nests from March 1 through September 15. BURROWING OWL Nest Site: No human encroachment within 150 feet of the nest site from March 15 through October 31. Although Burrowing Owls may not be actively nesting during this entire period, they may be present at burrows up to a month before egg laying and several months after young have fledged. Therefore it is recommended that efforts to eradicate prairie dogs or destroy abandoned towns not occur between March 15 and October 31 when owls may be present. Because nesting Burrowing Owls may not be easily visible, it is recommended that targeted surveys be implemented to determine if burrows are occupied. More detailed recommendations are available in a document entitled "Recommended Survey Protocol and Actions to Protect Nesting Burrowing Owls" which is available from the Colorado Division of Wildlife RaDtor Use Sites Restrictions Around C Cl) 0) U) O C v/ 4) C O N a, Recommended u a) O = time period for which seasonal restrictions are in place. 0 Z Awe to O U- a. a) iin > c to 2 6. o. L. ii: 2 a) LL uer Janne asfl pue saioads was) a) a) 0 O a) a) cU a) a) a t1) 41 ow tU a) a) 150 feet •- r r 7"?\1 fc.s1 r r NS\N T rs:zst I r r vs%%1 r;LI r r NRI S r rithout a hment ith a hment luman No Surface Occupancy hment No Surface Occupancy C a) E No Surface Occupancy hment k - No Surface Occupancy No Surface Occupancy hment hment k No Surface Occupancy hment tuewq C a) E C a) E hmenl Co Q L o C W CO O L o C W 0 CD O 2. t] a LU IN -±' c inH IDI N nl IC No I No I N o _ I N o _ I N o 1 No N o I N o 1 N o I 2 LL! . W I W LLI > W W I N fsigl W I N fsigl a W .E > W _ LU __ W > LU W > W 0 W W __ � W W_ > U J > LU > LU LU > 03 LU Iii> .O LU 0 > 0)> ITI Prairie I ACTI LL1 F- I WI— 0 Swains ACT 1 ' I— 0 w a I- 2 0 = m I- 0 P 0 C E- C I- 0 w c<a<< I--- 0 > I-- 2 0 u) O I- 0 <o< I— C2CC I— 0 I— 0 C I— 0 <I.< Ferrug AC direct AC direct 1 V C< 'V ISO N w w 0 -a R3 03 _ DEFINITIONS Active nest — Any nest that is frequented or occupied by a raptor during the breeding season, or which has been active in any of the five previous breeding seasons. Many raptors use alternate nests in various years. Thus, a nest may be active even if it is not occupied in a given year. Active winter night roost Areas where Bald Eagles gather and perch overnight, and sometimes during the day in the event of inclement weather. Communal roost sites are usually in large trees (live or dead) that are relatively sheltered from wind and are generally in close proximity to foraging areas. These roosts may also serve a social purpose for pair bond formation and communication among eagles. Many roost sites are used year after year. Human encroachment - Any activity that brings humans in the area. Examples include driving, facilities maintenance, boating, trail access (e.g., hiking, biking), etc. Hunting perch — Any structure on which a raptor perches for the purpose of hunting for prey. Hunting perches provide a view of suitable foraging habitat. Trees are often used as hunting perches, but other structures may also be used (utility poles, buildings, etc.). Surface occupancy — Any physical object that is intended to remain on the landscape permanently or for a significant amount of time. Examples include houses, oil and gas wells, tanks, wind turbines, roads, tracks, etc. CONTACT For further information contact: David Klute Bird Conservation Coordinator Colorado Division of Wildlife 6060 Broadway Denver, CO 80216 Phone: 303-291-7320 Email: david.klute@state.co.us REFERENCES Bech≥ird, M.J., and J.K. Schmutz. 1995. Ferruginous Hawk (Buteo regalis), The Birds of North America Online (A. Poole, Ed.). Ithaca: Cornell Lab of Ornithology; Retrieved from the Birds of North America Online: http://bna.birds.cornell.edulbna/species/ 172 Buehler, I.A. 2000. Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), The Birds of North America Online (A. Poole, Ed.). Ithaca: Cornell Lab of Ornithology; Retrieved from the Birds of North America Online: http://bna.birds.corneil.edu/bna/species/506 Call, M. 1979. Habitat management guides for birds of prey. Technical Note No.338, U.S. Bureau of Land Management, Denver Service Center, Denver, CO. 69pp. Energy Research and Development Administration (ERDA). 1977. ETA for CUI Venture application for geothermal loan guarantee (Beryl and Lund, Utah). EIA/GE/77-8. Washington, D.C.. 109pp England, A.S., M.J. Bechard, and C.S. Houston. 1997. Swainson's Hawk (Buteo swainsoni), The Birds of North America Online (A. Poole, Ed.). Ithaca: Cornell Lab of Ornithology; Retrieved from the Birds of North America Online: http://bna.birds..cornell.edu/bna/species/265 Greater Yellowstone Bald Eagle Working Group. 1996. Greater Yellowstone bald eagle management plan: 1995 update. Greater Yellowstone Bald Eagle Working Group, Wyoming Game & Fish Dept., Lander WY 82520. 47p Grier, J.W., F.J. Gramlich, J. Mattisson, J.E.. Mathisen, J.V. Kussman, LB. Eider, and N.F. Green. 1983. The bald eagle in the northern United States. Bird Cons. 144-66. Haug, E.A., B.A. Millsap, and M.S. Martell. 1993. Burrowing Owl (Athene cunicularia), The Birds of North America Online (A. Poole, Ed.). Ithaca: Cornell Lab of Ornithology; Retrieved from the Birds of North America Online: http://bna.birds.cornell.edu//bnalspecies/061 Holmes, Tamara L. 1993. Behavioral responses of grassland raptors to human disturbance. MS Thesis. Colo. State Univ., Fort Collins. 62pp. Holthuijzen, A.M.A., W.G. Eastland, A.R. Ansell, M.N. Kochert, R.D. Williams, and L.S. Young. 1990. Effects of blasting on behavior and productivity of nesting prairie falcons.. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 18:270-281. Kochert, M. N., K. Steenhof, C. L. Mcintyre, and E. H. Craig. 2002. Golden Eagle (Aquila chrysaetos), The Birds of North America Online (A. Poole, Ed.). Ithaca:Cornell Lab of Ornithology; Retrieved from the Birds of North America Online: http://bna.birds.cornell.edulbnalspecies/684 Martin, D.J. 1973. Selected aspects of burrowing owl ecology and behavior. Condor 75:446-456. Northern States Bald Eagle Recovery Team. 1983. Northern States Bald Eagle Recovery Plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 75pp. Olendorff, R. R., and W.D. Zeedyk. 1978. Land management for the conservation of endangered birds. Pages 419-428 in S.A. Temple, ed. Endangered birds. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin. Poole, A.F., R.O. Bierregaard, and M.S. Martell. 2002. Osprey (Pandion haliaetus), The Birds of North America Online (A. Poole, Ed.). Ithaca: Cornell Lab of Ornithology; Retrieved from the Birds of North America Online: http://bna.birds.cornell.edulbna/species/683 Preston, C.R., and R.D. Beane. 1993. Red-tailed Hawk (Buteo jamaicensis), The Birds of North America Online (A. Poole, Ed.). Ithaca: Cornell Lab of Ornithology; Retrieved from the Birds of North America Online: http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/052 Reynolds, R., R.T. Graham, H.M. Reiser. 1992. Management recommendations for the northern goshawk in the southwestern United States. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-217. Fort Collins, Co. U.S. Dept of Agri., Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 90pp. Richardson, C.T. and C.I.. Miller. 1997. Recommendations for protecting raptors from human disturbance: a review. Wild'. Soc. Bull. 25(3):634-638. Rocky Mountain/Southwest Peregrine Falcon Recovery Team. 1984. American peregrine falcon Rocky Mountain/Southwest population recovery plan. U.S. Fish and wildlife Serve 105pp. Squires, J.R., S.H. Anderson, and R. Oakleaf. 1993. Home range size and habitat -use patterns of nesting prairie falcons near oil developments in northeastern Wyoming. J. Field Ornithol. 64:1- 10. Steenhof, Karen. 1998. Prairie Falcon (Falco mexicanus), The Birds of North America Online Poole, Ed.). Ithaca: Cornell Lab of Ornithology; Retrieved from the Birds of North America Online: http://bna.birds.cornell.eduIbna/species/346 Squires, J.R., and R.T. Reynolds. 1997. Northern Goshawk (Accipiter gentilis), The Birds of North America Online (A. Poole, Ed.). Ithaca: Cornell Lab of ornithology} Retrieved from the Birds of North America Online: http://bna.birds.cornell.edulbna/species/298 Suter, G.W. and J.L. Joness. 1981. Criteria for Golden Eagle, Ferruginous Hawk, and Prairie Falcon nest site protection. J. Raptor Res. 15(1):12-18. Swenson, J.E. 1979. Factors affecting status and reproduction of ospreys in Yellowstone National Park. J. Wild!, Manage. 43:595-601. Thomsen, L. 1971. Behavior and ecology of burrowing owls on the Oakland Municipal Airport. Condor 73:177-192. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2007. National Bald Eagle Management Guidelines. http://www.f vs.gov"migratorybirds/issues/BaldEagle/NationalBaldEagleManagementGuideline s.pdf White, C.M., N.J. Clum, T.J. Cade, and W.G. Hunt. 2002. Peregrine Falcon (Falco peregrinus), The Birds of North America. Online (A. Poole, Ed.). Ithaca: Cornell Lab of ornithology; Retrieved from the Birds of North America Online: http://bna.birds.cornell.eduibnaispecies/660 Revised 02/2008 From: To: Subject: Date: Michelle Martin Chris Gathman FW: meeting per IGA Tuesday, October 31, 2017 12:54:21 PM Hi Chris, This is for case number PRE17-0245. Michelle Martin Planning Manager 1555 N 17th Ave Greeley, CO 80631 mmartin@co.weld.co.us PHONE: (970) 400-3571 FAX: (970) 304-6498 Confidentiality Notice: This electronic transmission and any attached documents or other writings are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify sender by return e-mail and destroy the communication. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action concerning the contents of this communication or any attachments by anyone other than the named recipient is strictly prohibited. Original Message From: keenesburgclerkrtebb.net[mailto:keenesburgclerkrtebb.net] Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 10:00 AM To: Torn Parko Jr. <tparko@weldgov.com> Cc: Nick Holland <nick.holland@curetonmidstream.com> Subject: meeting per IGA Hi Tom, I wanted to let you know that we met with the folks from Cureton Midstream and discussed their upcoming project. They have fulfilled the IGA and met with us on September 19, 2017. The town has no objections to Cureton moving forward with the county. Please contact me with any questions. Thank you! Debra Chumley, CMC Town of Keenesburg 140 S. Main St. Keenesburg, CO  80643 303-732-4281 • Emergency plan submitted with USR will be published on Weld County website We can submit the EP and then distribute contact info in the response card • Emergency Response Card Q -Emergency numbers -wallet size • Damage prevention council (DPC) at Weld -- monthly mtg. • Frontrange Emergency Resource Group -- working group training for first responder and industry Railroad, meet once a month, safety training and coordination. a Roy, Jeff Jones Anadarko, Jeff C aryll(sp) Extraction Q COGCC and other industry folks attend a October 26 Anadarko in Platteville usually Thursdays • H2S issues have been reported lately, this needs to be addressed at some level • LEPC - local emergency planning committee a EM runs that • Adams county has a committee for LEPC • City of Aurora has one and Arapahoe has one • Fourth Thursday of the first month of the quarter for Weld County • Good participation from fire departments • Sheriffs office hit or miss • State patrol and hazmat team attend regularly • DPC-first Thursday of the month a -breakfast for excavators and operators a -Island grove a Pipeline companies can setup displays and communicate with all that show up a Paradigm very involved a COPAW and Paradigm compete with meetings unfortunately. Annual get together for COPAW and Paradigm, share infrastructure and incident training • Gilcrest and south will likely have group mock emergency trainings and Gilcrest north • For our area they can call on these fire departments as well for EM: a Wiggins and Platte Valley Fire a Mountain View Fire © Ft. Lupton a Firestone Fire Department Allan Codwell with Sheriff's office -ops captain • Once USIA is in place meet with the county commissioners O Working session presentation is best Public notice will be sent out for working session meeting topics -FYI- just for scheduling purposes • Local reporters are usually there at the working session meetings, so be aware of that • Emergency plans --local contacts and local info --super important Q Hospital info O Operations person local a Where do the fire departments transport patients to a tactical response card MERRIE LEACH GARNER EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT COORDINATOR «<fle-1 jpeg>> WELD CO LINTY °FFACE O1: EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT (OEM) ROY RUfISILL DIRECTOR 1'150O SIREEt- PO BOX 758 ORE E LEY, COLORADO X32 E M1�AI+ rrudt-sai towetd.ca.us Tice ten) 540 CM- 0170) 381-5417 Fax (070'.134-7243 WEBSIT'E: wws.tO wa'3 ti u$ Stephanie Hackett, Brighton Emergency Management Thursday, October 5, 2017 1O:OO AM Location: Starbucks located at 530 E Bromley Lane, Brighton CO 80601 Attendees: Stephanie Hackett Cureton Representatives: Loren Locher Erica Jeung Meeting Notes: • Stephanie indicated that the Mayor of Brighton is changing out in the next couple of months, the new Mayor will be installed on January 1, 2018 • New City Manager in Brighton -- Phillip Rodriguez O http://www.brightonco.gov/CivicAlerts. asp. ?AID=695 • Hackett says the most important thing they are looking for is Cureton to provide trainings, meetings, and exercises with the fire departments for any O&G company • We brought up the Frontrange Emergency Resource Group and Stephanie said she had not heard of it and would like to have the info for it. • Brighton and SE Weld County Fire Departments have the most equipment and staff the other fire stations are partially volunteer • Double check Adams County requirements for Emergency Management Plans • Stephanie can review our Emergency Management Plan • She also organizes the mock events, she suggests we offer a few of them to the various departments --Northern part of the project area and the southern part of the project area • Table top exercises are good as well • Schedule early!!! 6 months out is a great timeframe for scheduling exercises • Problems in Past: Q No one knew what was going on with schedule, and also emergency management contacts a Ensure Weld County dispatch is involved in trainings and provided information o Share the schedule with the fire and EM teams Q Involve ALL emergency teams that could be called to action • Provide regular schedule updates to EM teams • Some conflict between Weld and Adams • Other people to meet with: O Brighton Fire Inspectors, Planners, Deputy Chief --- after submittal of application • Could we provide access to the maps, plans, and contacts via password protected Intranet site? Town of Hudson, Town Manager Tuesday, October 17, 2017 10:24 AM Location: Hudson Town Hall 50 S. Beech St. Hudson, CO 80642 Attendees: Joe Racine, Hudson, Town Manager Roy Fronczyk, AICP, Hudson Town Planner Cureton Representatives: Nick Holland Loren Locher Meeting Notes: Project overview was given followed by open discussion and Q&A. • Weld County IGA notification didn't include Hudson because Hudson is out of their Urban Growth District • Hudson boundary, as it pertains to the processing site property goes to County Roads 16 51 • Roy F told us that there is lots of midstream pipeline in and around Hudson • Joe R asked how the gas would get from the wellhead to the gathering line o A -Producer would make the connection from the wellhead to the gathering line o Consolidate connections to minimize overall number needed • PUC regulated? No, gathering system; COGCC C and USR permit for the Processing plant. Gathering lines under 10" • Flowlines? Not needed because of system design (6 -8 -inch lines) • Sensitivity to Firestone and Frederick incidents • Are we signing up as part of 811 system a YES • Similar to Kerr McGee's Processing Plant O Yes, smaller • Competition a Discovery • Last annexation a 2014 • Depth of cover? a 48" • Type of pipe? O Steel • Will the easements be recorded? a Yes • Current mayor is moving to Greeley • New Mayor will be appointed by the Town Council and then the position will be up for election • Town Council meetings 1st & 3' Wednesdays at 6PM • Good idea to make a presentation when we are ready Lochbuie Town Administrator Thursday, October 12, 2017 9:14 AM Location: 703 Weld CR 37 Lochbuie, CO 80603 Attendees: Samantha Byrne Steve Stamey -- Town Administrator Cureton Representatives: Loren Locher Nick Holland Erica Jeung Meeting Notes: • The Planning Department meets with Steve usually on Wednesdays, they all had something else going on so Steve and Samantha were the only attendees. They explained that their planning folks are all contract • Proposed pipeline is 1/2 mile away from Lochbuie, they wanted to know where it was exactly, we reviewed the overview map and also some maps they had on the wall with housing developments • They were interested in seeing a more detailed map • Extraction had been in earlier that day proposing the first well pad in the town limits of Lochbuie near WCR 6 • Samantha gave Nick the paper work necessary to develop oil and gas infrastructure in the Town of Lochbuie • Last night in their Town Hall meeting they changed their Comprehensive Plan and plan to update their land development code on January 1, 2018 • Only concerns from the town folk have been the redevelopment proposal of the mobile home park as you enter Lochbuie • A nearby tank battery has received some complaints from a town council member, Steve did not want to say which one • Steve brought up the Firestone and Frederick incidents and said that people are more aware of oil and gas operations after that • He asked questions about the pressure of the line near Lochbuie • Nick explained that it would be lower pressure around 110 pounds and 1200 pounds by the POT (point of terminus) • Steve asked questions about depth of cover; Nick explained that under roadways and crossings cover would be anywhere from 6-10 feet otherwise depth of cover is 48 inches • Steve said his town engineer would have to comment on what they typically do for roadway crossings • Blue Lake housing development has road improvements written into their land use plan/comprehensive plan for when/if they develop their land further but Steve did not have an idea of when that might happen • Steve also brought up ditch crossings and dealing with FRICO O • Lochbuie has no services • Brighton is the closest city with banks, grocery stores, etc. • 6500 residents in Lochbuie currently <<file-i jpeg>> Justin Jackson, Landowner Monday, October 23, 2017 10:00 AM Location: Jackson Residence 29945 WCR 18 Keenesburg, CO Attendees: Justin Jackson Cureton Representatives: Nick Holland Erica Jeung Meeting Notes: Mr. Jackson was on his way out when I approached his house. He re -parked his truck and we had a 15 minute conversation. Direct Questions from Mr. Jackson Where is the project located? Are we interfering with Mr. Robertson's driveway? Are we taking gas form Crestone Peak Resources that have active production on the Jackson family land to the south of his house? Do we know about the United Power proposed transmission line and did it have anything to do with our plant? Cureton Answers Let Mr. Jackson know about the proposed location for the plant Our plans are not interfering with Mr. Robertson's driveway. Our project stops short of his driveway access. We are not currently in any agreements with Crestone. We let Mr. Jackson know that our current customer is Verdad Oil and will be looking to add additional customers. We did not know about any transmission line. We let Mr. Jackson know that we are in discussions with UP to access electrical services for the plant but a transmission line would not be required for our purposes. We let him know that as we discuss our needs with UP we would ask about the transmission line and relay any information we obtain. Let Mr. Jackson know that we are meeting with the neighbors in 0.5 mile radius of the plant and that we are having an open house for the project on 11/14 and that he will receive a letter invitation for the meeting We encouraged Mr. Jackson to attend the open house to ask any questions that may arise between now and then. Cureton gave Mr. Jackson a proposed timeline for the project. Cureton and MDM provided Mr. Jackson with contact information and let him know to reach out anytime that he has a question or a concern. ichard Robertson, Landowner Tuesday, October 24, 2017 12:00 PM Location: Old Chicago 2155 Prairie Center Pkwy Brighton, CO 80601 Attendees: Richard Robertson Cureton Representatives: Cole Ones Dale House Nick Holland Erica Jeung David Ankle Meeting Notes: • Mostly a friendly/ casual conversation with little business discussion • Mr. Robertson made the following comments regarding the processing plant: Interested in having landscaping screening him from the visual of the plant • Nick said Cureton would consult with him about the landscaping to screen him and also see what he suggests for other landscaping coverage due to Mr. Robertson's knowledge of what grows best in the soil © Light at night • Dale informed him that the lights will be on at night but not the traditional fully lit up plant. Cureton will have down lighting and also only light up what needs light. Enough light to get from point A to point B and there will not be lights on equipment and places that do not require access © Inquired about property to the west of his home • Virgil Johnson (trust) property • David said he did not have a good number for this property yet but will look into it and give it to him once he has it. • Mr. Robertson would like to purchase the property so he can prevent anyone else from building on it so he still has his view Ivan & Betty Hayward Monday, October 30, 2017 10:00 AM Location: Hayward Residence 8947 County Road 51 Keenesburg, CO 80643 Attendees: Ivan Hayward Betty Hayward Cureton Representatives: Dale House Nick Holland Erica Jeung Meeting Notes: Discussion: Provided the Haywards with an electronic depiction of the site layout in comparison to their home and land. Discussed equipment and location of the equipment relevant to their home. Discussed the Open House and encouraged their participation. Questions form the Haywards: What will you be doing about Noise? A: Provided the Haywards with an explanation about our Noise Survey, analysis and plan moving forward. Asked permission to place a monitor at the southern edge of their property for our ambient noise survey. After analysis is completed we will circle back with the possible impacts and any proposed mitigation. What about lights? A: We are designing our lighting plan at the moment and will analyze potential impacts form our lighting scheme and mitigate these as necessary. We will have selective lighting along with all lighting will be downcast and shielded. How big will the detention pond be? A We are designing the size of it now based on the runoff calculation from the upstream areas that would feed the pond. We anticipate it to be about 2 acres. Our culvert under our driveway floods, if you are discharging to the roadside ditch how can we be sure it will not flood our driveway? A: We will circle back with our engineers to ensure our design does not impact flow velocity or capacity in the ditch resulting in flooding or scouring. We will look at any improvements that may need to be made. Is you facility 24/7? A: Yes it is. We will have up to 2 employees at the site at night and up to 8 during the day. Are you trucking in and out of the facility? How many trucks per day? A: We will have loading at the facility. Right now we are looking at 2 — 3 trucks per day. CR 51 gets very rutted and muddy during rain storms. Is Weld County making you improve the street? A: At this time they are not requiring improvements to CR 51 due to our proposed traffic volumes. We will look into any improvements that may need to be done to ensure a safe driving surface. Have you built plants before? What is your safety record? A: Yes we have been in the business for quite some time and have built multiple facilities like this. Safety is our number one priority. We want our employees to return home safely to their families after their shift. We also take the safety of our surrounding community safely and are engaging our emergency responders to coordinate on response efforts and responsibilities. Have you met with the fire districts? A: We have met with Keenesburg and will meet with Hudson hopefully on Thursday. Cureton asked about any trees that the Haywards have been successful in planting on their property. A: Pine trees, Poplar trees, red cedar, Austrian pines have all been planted successfully. Cureton provided the Haywards with contact info and let them know as the project progresses we will be meeting with them to seek feedback on our screening and noise plans as well as anything else they want to discuss. Haywards expressed their concern about their aggressive dog. Requested that we provide 24 hour notice to them for anyone coming onto the property. David Bell, Landowner meeting Tuesday, October 31, 2017 4:00 PM Location: Mr. Bell's residence 25526 WCR 18 Keenesburg, CO Attendees: David Bell Cureton Representatives: Nick Holland Erica jeung Meeting Notes: Q: Mr. Bell asked about truck u affic and if the gas plant would bring more traffic to the already busy road. A: The perinit f if approved would allow for 1-2 trucks a day but we anticipate 1-2 per week. The product from the plant will be moved through pipelines. Q: Will the road be improved by Cureton? A: Atthis time the county has not asked that road improvements be made due to the light traffic that the gas plant would bring, however it is something Cureton will look at before, during and after construction. Mr. Bell stated that the dust abatement agent makes the roads worse, Nick thought that Cureton would be using water to reduce dust during construction and would make note to not use anything that would further damage the road or make conditions worse. Q: How big is the detention pond for the site? There is a lot of water run off that can cause flooding near the Haywards and also in their ditch. Henrylyn ditch is usually full, there will need to be some drainage work done. A: The pond has been designed as 2 acres and 31ft deep. Engineering is looking at this and is taking into consideration the concerns from the Haywards an.d Mr. Bell to avoid drainage issues. • There is a water line north of the proposed site, Mr. Bell thinks it is about 150' ft easement, they were staking out there not too long ago,they might be adding another line. • His family used to own the land on which the plant will be located. It was his grandfathers, they sold it about 20 years ago. They still own the SW4 of Sec. 20 and in 2N64W29 to the south. Q: Where is the gas going? A: there are two lines to carry the product out of the plant, Cl 's line to the east and Williams to the west. • Mr. Bell is the President of the Board for the Henrylyn Irrigation District • He explained that the property does not come with water rights, but rather right to use the water. It is designated for agriculture only. He might be interested in leasing the water use for the land he farms across the street from the plant. Q: What type of landscaping? A: Trees, bushes, shrubs. Cureton is considering anything that will grow and provide some view shed. . Next steps are to setup a meeting with David, Dale, and maybe Rod from Henrylyn to discuss the water use. 1/2/ Mile Radius Land Owner Reach Out Notes CURETONMIDSTREAM Cureton Midstream; Frontage Gathering System 11/1/2017 Mr. Virgil Johnson (deceased) 765-643-0852 This number has been disconnected. 11/1/2017 Mr. Virgil Johnson (deceased) 765-642-8692 This number has been disconnected. 11/1/2017 BUR LLC 970-590-6220 Russell Gurtler -- LM for Russ about the letter and left my number 11/1/2017 Dechant Farm Partnership 303-717-0060 Sent David a text with the open house time and date, and to call me if he would like a one-on-one next week prior to the open house. 11/1/2017 Dechant Farm Partnership 303-717-0060 David Cell --He said he was busy at the moment and to send him a text. He also asked if he could bring his attorney, I told him yes, he can bring his attorney if he would like to. 11/1/2017 Dechant Farm Partnership 970-539-2175 This is Alvin's cell number. Voicemail, I did not leave a VM. 11/1/2017 Mr. John Ashley 303-857-9708 Spoke to John. He said he hasn't seen anything in the mail yet, but will look for it. He was a bit reserved, I offered a separate meeting if he was not able to make the Nov. 14th meeting and he said he would just look for the invite in the mail, 11/1/2017 Mr. & Mrs. Denning 303-536-9244 The woman who answered told me. This is not their phone number for the past three years, 11/1/2017 Mr. & Mrs. Denning 303-536-4775 This is the Hudson Post Office Number, it was listed under her name from Lexus Nexus 11/11/2017 Mrs- Barbara Reis 303-536-4686 Phone nu mnber no good. A woman answered as CDM and said there was no Barbara there. 11/1/2017 Front Range Resources LLC info[&reriewstrategies.com They replied and asked what I was inquiring about Front Range Resources for so they can better route my email. I explained Cureton is proposing to build a gas plant within a 1/2 mile of land owned by Front Range Resources and we just wanted to put a face to the name and tell them a little more a bout the project. 10/31/2017 Front Range Resources LLC infoPrenewstrategies.com Sent an email to the info address on their website to gain more information on who to talk to, 10/31/2017 Mr. Ross Meadow rmcadowl8,Sr;maitcom Sent email with project info. 10/30/2017 Mr. David Bell for Mary Ellen Bell 970-302-4397 Spoke to Mr. Bell, He agreed to Tuesday October 31 at 3:00 PM for a meeting. 10/30/2017 Mr. Trent Cook 303-536-0507 Called no answer, 4:29 PM 10/25/2017 Mr. David Bell for Mary Ellen Bell 970-302-4397 Spoke to Mr. Bell, He was on his tractor harvesting. Does not know when he will be available next week. He said to call him back on Monday. 10/25/2017 Front Range Resources LLC 303-376-9700 Called no answer, 1:21 PM 10/25/2017 Mr. Trent Cook 303-536-4242 Called no answer, 1:20 PM 10/25/2017 Mr. Trent Cook 303-536-4242 Called no answer, 9:26 AM 10/19/2017 Mr. Trent Cook 303-536-4242 Mr. Trent Cook, R4683107, said he is not concerned about the project and already spoke to Mr. Robertson. He is busy with wheat planting but said he would find some time to meet with us. He took my number and will call me back on Monday once he has an idea of his schedule. He was very friendly and thanked me for calling to inform him of the project. 10/19/2017 Front Range Resources LLC 303-376-970 This number is for Renew Strategies, but the number is listed through a Google search and the address for the companies a re the same. I ca (led and left a message for Mr. Mark Sullivan who is listed on the Secretary of State business listing and also on the Renew Strategies website as the CEO. My messaged stated that I am inquiring about Front Range Resources and wanted to know if he could help point me in the right direction regarding some property listed under that name on Weld County Assessors site 10/19/2017 Mr. Shayne O'hotto 303-523-8896 Mr. O'hotto, landowner at R8945434, said he already spoke to our land guy and he isn't concerned. What he would like to do is provide directional drilling to Cureton. He is out of town for a while he said but would like us to reach out to Tim Baxter at Sureshot Drilling 720.785.0225. He wants to know about the financial backing of Cureton so that if they provide work they will be paid. He questioned if the company was real as upon his first search Cu retain didn't have a website. I told him it was up and running now and that Cu reton is financially secure and that I wou Id 10/19/2017 Mr.. Ross Meadow 303-912-3135 Talked to Mr. Meadow, land owner at R8945433, he didn't have much interest in meeting and didn't have any concerns, he explained he is very busy next week but said we could send him some information via email, rmcadow18@gmail.com 10/19/2017 Mr, Justin K. Jackson 303-902-2264 Talked to Mr. Jackson, home owner at R0576001, he said that Mr. Robertson has already told him about the project and he is not concerned about it. I explained that we would still like to introduce ourselves if he had time to say hello. He agreed to Monday at 11:00 AM. 10/19/2017 Mrs. Jackson 303-452-8246 This number was listed as Mr. Justin K. Jackson`s number, however it is his parents number. They live off of WCR 16. She provided me Justin's number. 10/19/2017 Mr, Ivan Hayward 720-431-6637 Called Mr. Hayward, home owner at R1516102, he is curious where the project is exactly, I informed him that when we meet with him we would be able to give him a more accurate depiction of where the processing plant and associated pipelines will be. He said he would talk to his wife and call me back. II 1WIIDSTRE1�li Communication Tracking Sheet Meeting Date Salutation First Name Last Name Contact Title Contact Organization Address Line 1 Address Line 2 City Zip 1 Zip 2 State Docket/Project District/ Area Weld County 10/4/2017 Director Roy Rud isi I I Director of Emergency Management Weld County, Office of Emergency Management 1150 O Street Greeley 80631 CO 10/4/2017 Ms. Merrie Garner Emergency Management Coordinator Weld County, Office of Emergency Management 1150 O Street Greeley 80631 CO City 9/19/2017 Ms, Debra Chu mlet Town Manager Town of Keenesburg 140 S. Main Street Keenesburg 80643 CO 9/19/2017 Mr. Kent Bruxvoort Town Engineer Town of Keenesburg 140 S. Main Street Keenesburg 80643 CO 9/19/2017 Mr. Todd Hodges Town Planner Town of Keenesburg 140 S. Main Street Keenesburg 80643 CO 9/19/2017 Mr. Marc Johns Public Works Director & Board of Trustees Town of Keenesburg 140 S. Main Street Keenesburg 80643 CO 9/19/2017 Mayor Danny Kipp Mayor Town of Keenesburg 140 S. Main Street Keenesburg 80643 CO 9/19/2017 Chief Torn Beach Fire Chief of SEWPD Southeast Weld County Fire Protection District 90 Main Street Keenesburg 80643 CO 10/4/2017 Ms, Stephanie Hackett Emergency Management Brighton City of Brighton 425 5. Main Street Brighton 80601 CO 10/5/2017 Mr. Joe Racine Town Manager Town of Hudson 50 S. Beech Street Hudson 80642 CO 10/5/2017 Mr. Roy Fronczyk AICP, Town Planner Town of Hudson 50 S. Beech Street Hudson 80642 CO 10/11/2017 Mr. Steve Stamey Town Administrator Town of Lochbuie 703 Weld CR 37 Lochbuie 80603 CO 10/11/2017 Ms. Samantha Byrne Land Use Town of Lochbuie 703 Weld CR 37 Lochbuie 80603 CO Landowner 10/23/2017 Mr. Justin Jackson Landowner 24495 WCR 18 Keenesburg 80643 CD 10/24/2017 Mr. Richard Robertson Landowner 8537 WCR 51 Keenesburg 80643 CO 10/30/2017 Mr. & Mrs. Ivan & Betty Hayward Landowner 8947 WCR 51 Keenesburg 80643 CO 10/31/2017 Mr. David Bell Landowner 25526 WCR 18 Keenesburg 80643 CO Samuel Engineering We Provide Solutions 8450 East Crescent Parkway, Suite 200 Phone: 303.714.4840 Greenwood Village, CO 80111 FAX: 303.714.4800 DRAINAGE NARRATIVE Cureton Midstream, LLC 518 17t" Street, Suite 650, Denver, CO 60MMSCFD Cureton Gas Plant Part of the NE 1/4 of Section 19, T2N, R64W, 6th PM Known as Lot B, RE -3799 and Lot B, RE -3190 Weld County, Colorado PREPARED BY: SAMUEL ENGINEERING, INC. 8450 EAST CRESCENT PARKWAY, SUITE 200 GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO 80111 ISSUED FOR USR PERMIT 17-XXXX Project Number 17227-01 — Rev. A October 2017 Samuel Engineering We Provide Solutions 8450 East Crescent Parkway, Suite 200 Phone: 303.714.4840 Greenwood Village, Co 80111 FAX: 303.714.4800 GENERAL LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION A. Site Location The subject project is located in part of the northeast 1/4 of Section 19, Township 02 North, Range 64 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, County of Weld, State of Colorado. The property address is To Be Determined (TBD). The property is located approximately midpoint between County Roads 18 and 20 and adjacent to County Road Si, No public streets are proposed within the property. B. Description of Property The subject property including two separate parcels is approximately 145.88 acres. The lots will be reconfigured into two different shaped lots (one at 101.64 acres and the other 44.24 acres) as part of the Use By Special Review (US R) process. The property has irrigated crop land on the east half and native grasses on the west. 1. There are two irrigation ditches located on the western part of the property; Jim number 2 irrigation ditch is furthest west and the Henry Lyn irrigation ditch is located approximately 100' west of the proposed equipment. All surface water associated with the proposed gas plant will be directed away from the ditches. There are no lakes, streams in the area of the proposed development. The subject property is not located in a floodplain. The surrounding area development consists of residential properties to the north and west. There is a well pad and a tank battery located on the property west and northwest of the proposed development. 4. Topographic relief over the property ranges from 4980' to 4920' in elevation and is characterized by flat grades that typically range from 0.5% to 3%. The site generally slopes from southwest to northeast. There are two (2) predominant soil types present, Weld Loam, (USC rating CL) and Olney loamy sand (USC rating SM). Existing and Proposed Drainage The majority of the soils on the site have a Hydrologic soil group rating of C. The site where the plant is proposed is currently planted with agricultural crops. The existing drainage sheet flows across the site from southwest to northeast and into Samuel Engineering We Provide Solutions 8450 East Crescent Parkway, Suite 200 Phone: 303.714.4840 Greenwood Village, CO 80111 FAX: 303.714.4800 the County Road 51 roadside ditch. There are no water quality features or erosion control measures for storm water runoff. 3. Stormwater from the improved site will be directed to a proposed 1.5 acre-foot detention and water quality pond (the 1.5 acre-foot is a calculated but preliminary number for storage volume) before discharging into the natural drainage patterns. The detention pond will be designed to hold the 100 -year 1 -hour event and release at the 10 -year 1 hour release rate following Weld County Drainage requirements for Non -Urbanizing Drainage Areas. CONCLUSIONS 1. The proposed detention will provide water quality and detention for the current and proposed site development and releasing stormwater at the historic rates. 2. A full drainage report will be prepared and submitted with grading pla construction drawings. t P ns and 1 It,,, , --r;_.-; - ,. t .- 1211)CUILri. I -.s! 1 ti T qqfi y1 _ it 1 7: . a E '1.irr ---•116"1:17::: • ... _.■■ ■■� . _ ■ �1 1'. HOW - AU n t Seta :a Clark NEWEL. �.J$L_ea actor- .O14f9'M 77r MI®.w� e1=,1s�- ...lwl.a Pr'r*'i1511(7 ,,[,y,��n maw* tiM', in qJ�1 iii.IEY 719v •71)17 .■■■■ _-■■■■■ _■rod,•sm -mg? 9.911 Juan{a[`fw• ;Hi • ,r^ok purr "dill 1111 ;:.ns• Sali1'1:1c� �cdrnhl�rq- .ISIa1v1w1a,1Y:C 11=f �I�V r cihnTarIHr -. - -, I yg II G� I E ..• ...,�,� r _� 1 •1 .•r19II !t ®A 0,01.1-C.F.-i7,:.. '1 ' i:�'rl Slgc5 ..-----A StI[IT- : ill!: 1'1.5. 1SY•SIRI19 A ! •. i��ll�Silt� ly 1fA111� '.1 A n a a Vicinity Map [ r a 4- Samuel Engineering We Provide Solutions 8450 East Crescent Parkway, Suite 200 Greenwood Village, CO 80111 L 3 l • 1. ■ Phone: 303. 714.4840 FAX: 303.714.4800 I I u ,..22 id _ _ l fTIF1lIl� - _ - - - - raralwt Ydiab.'iLPf. mot'. ansa mar ytn.ti �, 2= I, va.;.a. 9 ,1, r a ... R'44410 .,1e¢K.a "'J' e La a4•f '� ...a_ a: �_ .� _ _ r� wig_ _ _ a. IN �� ... an ■e — - _ _.sa bob* a -,..r r — AI il 1:175%!6 sins aft . eelaa. L �I red Inl rrrai -- �w% ii�/ri ' el ' erg -..�IwfP •rage M.IWII L aerr� -s.ani. - 5 LI' I '�11 , c risen n r' I 1 Jr I� Nom, WIIIIVICI a_ an _- iaa. �- ialc� .�: anam: Il a:111 F�• as 9ua.m LEIIIMID alle Mb IA NSW - • IllkOMNI PROVO1M0 ILCrn 11.rlaI ONa v!arsw!iRp.6F ' Fifistfre - PRDIa0SFr11 L41T lst7.! iEUiriL oY311e3itail moo i, -- � � aalrllFlraSf i0 7a/1l} IrC$E3 I Ktivr, srw>'!Qh�e�C 0r 11' •--- --- --� ones. ' _„a 1 w*leate4t3fM Len ggqq�' I I f10' Plallnilala w7r ulrt•e ti al♦:arrxa laaa min liQlC'RE't. CC`fi1TISt; d all •r', ti ■ " alms Ora; � a a a a *n 4c .�Y}K*+', Weer Y+Ii, .c A t Y7 ". imaPCIl6 pal SicVaIwa I new ne asp n a n tholes r m ur - ..aarr r-., euea= ulna ueem all 'ektia'Mt $1414 Welk it .... -- —•-r� `frl._r•r 1 = I y' e►aCrtall a tm r .• f;pe§ era navA 4 t 6iaORYSra ilea II a fpl, MAW* I �' 1 %Tit ♦ 1 I i': ak�4i`.j; aT'I Itial r yrr_ a It4STING 7 initi• at Kit nreae fan IC Inv IY15N, Ian ss.. ., f SA ESA nits .. ' n tkur i h WL -� T1ee+na iitaL urn smolt-�i•-a Saga Pa. aev r Enna r a"afiai� arlcrlrrsn e} t]aGa 1y ! - I rwnI 'Ikr�aael� -- I' -„ _ - a , _ _ 'h �.. mpg it I` .�.._ _ _ 1 u _ •! �i l II - I. MO nn &Rv ant lanalle.e• MIA r Wrarr� is u wne1V1. ale A. Iw M alas& m I a a. WIZ r, l.®a Ca*" Fut itxac wL 41 aTtFi •• OCI I 'Aa ra ... _ _% Y T-. .r T Ng l X. leA.Fi fiMall Oe,mint ii amp � r. awn IMeal:rrra.aaacrnrrlrmwaorearm CCf1�AM *NM maima r +.*iaa. J /lie 9 )r a, Mt lt&C4F a• Migi PI Puna; Ca-®-IMh ourosit lib61 If. MOM V WHIM t•e i'. halt -\\.P 71355.Ate - - • EAT 1'x./.7{1 ior 7.+c�es lit ` r '1] L9r 1\TaL-cT Stfl TSrrNLL `— °' le nersrlf elerlel�crrs' _`•e•a — Mara ....a•.s ..� _ —IL rr.•� as 19.1.4431 Aft r� ,f 'f{5aF ILar�-a.{•, sante 1.1 Lea: lea Whoa anal ea re i., We tr1►�ca3,Itra ii.•Vta+vaU 40140efiY It,iIY I nLta It VW aereeelaarllroe'_ n rrw ranaaty ®rte Winans MEM araeu Maier' a, Gr714MSS I aua tvJlc nitestIN. i replan ■ r ILLY i L ��, •. fa crillK-- F MAW 7n0a, Warr Ma err au r*.•�4 4 otheitus I aai 17raasaiC a neaaaa • : , . G I I. renal sews rule son I' iL alb Mali iSJ'i! Ga. a.11Ol rt3a'H!v RAW to algae ha-i.BR.!YIY nova II # 1� la 'L' r� e �I Iddl:ilatlal+ll'fIp_rWi?•ala ee+a� 'rnee'Yvar. ante IN -, y n >�'� I - '� 1 jk Jana Tort Ia • r! aa1•r*• rr n t Ia-att� 1- atimsr• II =' - a craw - M A a - _ ■ _ -' - names ra*.� Iu'•raYnv - - - - rare aer�ryyay�srea. v van' w �, a�,� -era • If Jinn I ,satpin at - _. �-- f.�-.,,,.._, -,. ��:..� it ..rs_. 9.hiy�Ritel :-eve SS a ... --- s.a. - .al 'f1Y1.Ali i ratrra'• r CWILea 4 WM Onlia . a.aal'.wa (area INVIIMI NO tlhr Oates [Sinn •t. s SIN r4 rnn. I a FaSa34al iaLa •I pi in" —1. a4�a1 _niulit 7aaYri,�h w§I....,a-n:, I,r aaarr as :ors Preliminary 1 Shoeing „ I I I ana alllaraa I I "° �' �"� I T. SW POI �alwrwan6mn IJ f - I .aa r' - .e' as IR6tIpa RAM oars Clang ��i'M4 sr, Oa fast �y'a In IL IvaacrQaa it, _ rZ.l-w•o+arnsat �'� �}.Oly aft CaUtit. MANS � VIM I''#$7 - t I ( -.....,t�aeaaar. swn ..T.:::... 1 rtrrl.'a.a r.a� r. L i :MI .:erit�.r-.7,. a -l.il� I I ...Y .4 nuts anvil' rrislat t 'E .. •'! .�+-• !!—�. r.�� e1�p U4.Oa:�:��ff{{.aa�� ! aria rT, -1•• :_. - .... .. '1 dp it jet d I 114 ..m....- ,•, w i il ii vivre .... . .c.. /.y._�T� A YR1-i-1.01 'R La. a1rl.lr it Flat,\Y} ■I rte Ma! J2riil.a ve afTI..a na nano pl fnV-'ate r.� •lI b c Site Plan 4 I 3 9 i a 1 2 3 J A B C D E F v H N 92000 0 C.I N M '^ w Q a m +� r', C '� PRfll'ERTY i u R w 1COR�EE15„�Cq G n w O n O in. w O ,n w G ' n JJ 0 C. C. o PROP'S IY r1 in ,n In w w CORNER w OWNER: I N 91 g4O.3g Q v in in w 0 0 '� in ,^ w O vn in w I 0 I in w G ip ,^ w OWNER:lit [•IZQ4r1-IZAt'1GE RESOURCES LLC (34'1 NER: I COOK, OF0RC',F TRFNT E 5} EXISTING k LJ - STEJAR.TI THOMAS JOHN 914.01 -a -, - _ _ - - --- E 53 279.1Fs 6S.S.03' N69'7145"E _ — - N.,(, 91800 - _ EXISTINGN FENC,;E - OWNER: II OW NER: EXISTING UNDERGROUND WATER UTILITY k 1.� Ui ,s' PROPERTY HAY troARD. IVA N L NORTH BROWNING, CAROL I ° �+ CORNER N 91 615.474 ` C' IS .:,U' ?.)U' a:rU' %n 9 4 EXISTING '',�1ELL1?AI), E 54 921.�Q PROPERTY ;r1LE: 1" = ISCi `''ID `` 1oX►15.L'� 1.11#9°7'45"E ■ CORNER N 9160O - - - _ _ — _ _ N 91630.6/ �- uI EXISTING FE\CE ■ — _ NER: — E};15TING HAYSTACKS �� 41 LEGEND [)'A1 SLO.1, V JAPIES A TRUST ' 1:3 r: LG s` tire ■ ■ ■ PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE N 91100 y_ PROPERTY PROPOSED }5ED LOT SIZE TOTAL - - - -A.DJOINIM1IG PROPCRTY LINE �' 44.2410 ACRES Ir EXIS`TINGACC;ESS ROAD HFNRt I iN IRRIGATION DITCH• gpRNER N 91 100.40 ' _ _ , 4 IQ IZEM.•IN‘JNI}ISI,lIZI$E1) E a°�Iia 3•fs• ;' • SECTION LINE - _ — _ -- • - - - - - N 91200 z 0 PROI}Q$EI) I)ETENT1q VOLUME = IS N POND. ACRE FEET. I)ETENTIOK I)E?IGN I SITE BOUNDARY/PROPERTY LINE NI) I5 A Mo AREA I 4--V DRAINAGE FLOW ARRO'N d- td r C t Co3 PItC1l'rJSFd SITE BOUNDARY/PROPER PQ I\ I3sfILl)}sTTRAGE \ IN LINE - _ �■• ■ s■� TRAFFIC FL�1V1 ARROW tb' 3' N3 1 1.'1X}"E - _ .L' - - � - - — _ - --" — PROPOSED Lt 1' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - # - - -- -� S 5 , RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT LINE _ • N 91000 OWNER: j PROPERTY li PROP. 6' CHA I NI INK FFNCF FYTST Iii' R ES, P,ARP,ARA CORNER I\ - I ; HICIHT-f1F-'.4'A/Y -I) N f31 1162.53641 I H I' I;r:ItKEI}'HIRE ; 4 E 53 297.35 I EXISTING 72.328 ACRE LOT FLARE -0--+0 I EXISTING TOP I • I. NOTES N 90800 , WATFRRODY - ■ a I --EXISTING • - e v � `� PO i'IFRI OVERHEAD I NFS i O),l1 UER: gDI R I I. THE PROPOSFI) STTF TS IOC4TFI) IN SFCTTON 19, I C TOWNSHIP 42 wo, RANGE 64 VIII EST, 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, wort -m, '',�1LLI) qp N1f rtTH-App_ c w t> a 't 'A'ATE1NG 4YATGtt}QI}Y 7 TOP - EY,I5TING PROPERTY UNC �. __ • —_ I ,• ■ 2. THE SITE S,`1RV E1' Fon THIS PRQ)EdT ','IAs PREPARED 13Y LW SURVEY, IN 2017. THE HORIZONTAL IIATLIM IS I}ASEIJ OK o I. a-- _ 1 N 906011 ,•e, - , �- -- -� y PLANE NAD VERTICAL — _ _ _ - - — - HEATERS COLORADO STATE COORDIUATE5, 83 (2011), Its I� r _ - _ !' ■ 1 i • 1(' ":5 � (� �e 2_ I)AT.IMI IS I3ASEI) ON NMI, 88. 3. OFFSITE PIPING 4 N PIPING CONNECTIONS TO THE FACILITY a NJ. •a 10,1.1-llllLLI''t cl MCC ■iDESliNED 6Y OTHERS. N 94104 Fri EXISTING V.' ELLPAI) rn G E 4, SOTI INFORMATION CAN l)F FOUND ON DRAWING CP-CF-104. i - PLAN PS DENNING, q4�1 NER: R©IlEltT COH G w• ��a A TANK BATTERY - CRYO op II - PRtII�C)4ED LP.YDOWN YARD i • rti • ,� ■ Ul ■ _ I +u i� i� (4 AcRFS; N !30200 If, i 'a EXISTING 73.553 ACRE LOT e - DENY . ■ y9 L N rn ``+ TAI3ILIZER9. nn Ili CaiiPRE55QR5 n 1 gym -- , METER t1/4\ SEPARATOR , 1 � • i I �� + N 90000 PROPOSED LOT SIZE TOTAL �}` J �., U PROPERTY LINE SETBACKS .;.• _ - , LIGHTING WILL RE DOWNCAST _ _ „_ _ _ __ iw 1(� 1 �� ACRES ES C ONTRO L SHIELDED. LOCATION T(} RE1. 5ITC GRADING RILL DCI}CRFORkiCI) NO CLOSCIt TI IAN 5 fCCT g. ROOM DETERMINED FROM ANY PROPERTY LINE. 116E t 58"E 410.55' PROP. G' CHAINLINK FENCE e PROPERTY WITH 1' I.ARI;ED trdIRE SLUG CATcHE1i a PARKING - it} 5PA[.;E N 89804 - CORNER PROPERTY CORNER \I I I _ DRAIN 14NK tHENRY N 89 864.04 i N 84 LYN IRRIGATIOk OITCH E 5.3 323.37 TO RCMIAIN UNDIST,JRBCI) 'R`pp / �, PROP. PROJECT SIGN L 53 172.80 3.f#L NGL STt7 TRUCK RAGE u LO. DINGS ■ A- � " OWNER: RICHARD I EXISTINGROBERTSON,. PROPERTY CORNER p / �� I LW ItANCL/LC1I 10•'1 ROM PLAN I , ��; FENCE N -27 I N S960O853' COUNTY ROAD 31 o 89 an. - ACCESS PERMIT 11/41). AP17-xxx CS411NER: KFFNFS F iRGI CO BO6'13-9618 0, t 11 vti E 34 869.60 o JJJ it? '�' U) Ce • • ■ • JOHNSON, VIRGIL ' H PROPERTY �y - e PROPOSED _ TURN AR(]JM1lf1 - a 1 I ■ I CORNER 4 . EHAUFIBFFN N 89100 N t3{F 317.36 ten d PROPOSED TWO -V AY TRAFFIC • , ■ TsR1JNDCATFDE� 811 rn !cm `g : ADD 1,2(:(3,131' C TO ALL E `�3 }5 r7,}� = -19 { e s NOR IHIN,≥ COORUINF;IES - L'•.57' SP.:967'.SZ"A JI, Fes- - - - - AND 3,2to,ove I4 ALL -- • --- _„�� _ _ �- _---_..------------- - �- _ --� - 1319.-c6' S89014'4O'11-! EA STING COORNINATE5_ is wles1 1St N 89200 I 1 QirJNFR: DON FR= I � PRQPERT'iPROPERTY CORNER EXISTING 171116E O4t NFR: DO UQT I)ISTJRI3 CORNER N 89 316-8c1 I EXAMPLE: I San wet M 6 ')CC• = N L[67O'i'' R: E 115CC• = E 321151JC• Preliminary I I N 9 302.27 I I JACKSOA JUSTIN I K I 5 JACKSON I R,OI;BIF I YNh I E 54 $69-99 ASHLEY I JOHU R E 55 97�I,C,'? I BELL. t'1RR' . tilAR El I FN Not For Construction Ihk 17:u1117-tlih•:51Jm"1n,i is a lln:b-.r'nl J:r-,11u r; -re.l I:n:Irn11S.,£I::. r. su +ic.rsi=isrtrorIt: ,•-ar.r..:.rk. U:-: r.:., .1 .I:.-i:iorc. +I r, Irmlr. oar ar..r.-ir .t:.'ihnri1alt.T.;IYIi 8=k .r.r.u,rl :; :rir.1; alt. 6.411:-.1 a-I.npa1 hl v rhrh-rr. ma etc. p'P+hIAIF1.,6 • W.II:IIIVhII Ih1AF H Pi IA dl . 9 -:YIN •1-t I. rl• I.„.. A'4 •: t• - I' 6:' e4-• TITLE PROIEt'T WINTER s -r■-. '- CURET'J'N MIDSTREAM _::: L IV: WELD COUNTY. CO Q� � CUR MIDSTREAM ET0N y� CURETON FRONT RANGE, LLC FRONT RANGE GAS PLANT CIVIL GENERAL OVERALL SITE PLMI 17227 cnv:r:M. �SEL`iY.EY :r Iui75/i, •? - - ,14.,.: T. 1111 r . 1G12r/2'3_- GRAINING h1JNECI [RAINING RIr ws A IS.SLEL MI! US:: i:• c. Sl 1 hiH '....r.; 431Samuel l Erg irl@ rin •pt ?rQvr,:C Suit 0 Vr15 Q rfl +riid i. i !Si I' ri•i: �.',3• NI GI-cl av:Jrllll.u.: tic. or 1,1.L^. Pt r 32:24144iDG —^: v5. rr_L-•rt,, < Li •'j :i C 'me A. p • - ,I. J•-l':•'T I-1 ]4T 7. I : L 7. - - g_ S• :'J _ri i VJ. _ S:r,-"oi. CST' L• .11•.'x:1:: P•" - C 2 �� — `— 1t 2 '' I, REFERENCE DRAWINGS R E tI I S I O h S en•:a.:c: � E b' I S J f'> t•1 ti waste Management Plan The following outlines general guidelines for waste management practices at all Cureton Midstream LLC facilities. 1. General Waste Management Practices The following management practices must be followed in the management of wastes generated within the Front Range Gas Plant (Plant); 1.1. Dispose or manage wastes and recoverable materials in permitted or otherwise authorized locations and facilities only. Unauthorized disposal or management will not be tolerated. Reduce waste generation whenever practical. This is known as waste minimization or pollution prevention. 1.2. Reuse or recycle materials whenever practical. This not only lowers consumption of raw materials; it also eliminates the need for waste disposal. 1.3. Avoid co -mingling wastes of different classifications. For example, never place nonhazardous wastes in the same container as hazardous waste. In addition, keep recyclable material separate from non -recyclable waste. It may be difficult or impossible to separate wastes after they are generated. 1.4. Maintain good housekeeping practices. Employees and contractors should maintain neat, clean work areas to reduce the need for additional clean up and the wastes it would generate. 1.5. Properly store wastes, especially hazardous wastes, to avoid releases to soil, water, air, until they can be appropriately managed. 1.6. Clearly identify waste containers. Use a label or other means to clearly identify the contents of containers of hazardous, non -hazardous and inert wastes. 1.T Document quantities and disposition of all hazardous and non -hazardous wastes as instructed in this plan. Waste tracking can help to manage costs, and is required for all hazardous wastes. This information will be included in the final report developed at the conclusion of response activities. 1.8. Recovered liquids (oil, water, sludge) should be collected and stored in as large a container as possible (Department of Transportation [DOT] drum, tote tank, frac tank, or barge) to maximize the decanting potential, facilitate uninterrupted recovery, and to minimize equipment decontamination requirements. 1.9. Communicate your ideas for waste minimization or waste management improvements to supervisors and fellow employees in different areas. 2. Waste Handlers 2.1. Liquid materials recovered will be collected for proper disposal or recycling by the following oil recycling company: Company - TBD Address - TBD Phone - TBD Emergency Phone- TBD 3. Waste Designation The process of classifying waste as solid or hazardous waste is termed "waste designation? Petroleum products such as diesel generally do not designate as hazardous waste. Recovered oil liquids and other materials contaminated by oil that are not designated as hazardous waste may be recycled, burned, or blended for fuel are considered solid waste and subject to designation as a hazardous waste as determined through testing If they do not designate as a hazardous waste they are classified and managed as a solid wastes 3.1. Waste Characterization Wastes that can typically be identified as non -hazardous via operator or generator knowledge include non -oiled waste from the response activities and minimally oiled wastes such as some discarded decontaminated or personal protective equipment (PPE). Some oiled waste material may be tested to determine if the waste is a federal or state hazardous waste. If the waste is designated as not hazardous, testing will identify if the waste concentration is low enough in total oil and grease or total organic carbon to be accepted in the local landfill or Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (R!CRA) Class III disposal facility. Spent oiled boom and sorbent material as well as contaminated soil, sand or other loose, natural material would be composite sampled as means to classify the material. All oily waste streams will be characterized to ensure the wastes are managed in accordance with federal and state hazardous waste regulations. The testing results will determine the final disposition and disposal of the waste. A minimum of 10 percent of a waste stream (e.g. oily waste bags) will be tested if operator knowledge indicates hazardous waste may be present (Refer to Section E.2.c) 3.2. Waste Classification 3.2.1. Oily - Liquid Wastes Oily liquid wastes (i.e., oily water and emulsions) that would be handled, stored, and disposed of during operations are very similar to those handled during routine storage and transfer operations. Oily water and emulsions may be generated by vehicle operations (e.g., spent motor oils, lubricants, etc.), and equipment cleaning operations. 3.2.2. Non-O►ily - Liquid Wastes Significant quantities of non -oily liquid wastes outside of sewage is not anticipated for the Plant. A septic system will handle sewage on site. 3.2.3. Solid Wastes A solid waste is defined as any discarded material provided that it is not specifically excluded under the regulations. These exclusions cover materials such as domestic sewage and mixtures of sewage discharged through a sewer system or industrial wastewater point source discharges. A discarded material is any material which is abandoned (disposed of, burned or incinerated) or accumulated, stored or treated prior to being abandoned. A discarded material is also any material recycled or any material considered inherently waste like. Recycled material is considered solid waste when used in a manner constituting disposal, placed on land or burned for energy recovery A solid waste may be considered a hazardous waste. A solid waste, as defined above, may be a hazardous waste if it is not excluded from regulation and is either a listed hazardous waste or exhibits the characteristics of a hazardous waste. A solid waste exhibits the characteristics of a hazardous waste if it exceeds the thresholds established in determining the following: • Ignite bi I ity • Corrosivity • Reactivity • toxicity A solid waste may also become a hazardous waste if it is mixed with a listed hazardous waste or, in the case of any other waste (including mixtures), when the waste exhibits any of the characteristics identified above. 3.2.4. Oily - Solid/Semi-Solid Wastes Oily solid/semi-solid wastes that may be generated include damaged or worn-out booms, disposable/soiled equipment, used sorbent materials, saturated soils, contaminated beach sediments, driftwood, and other debris. 3.2.5. Non -Oily - Solid/Semi-Solid Wastes Non -oily solid/semi-solid wastes that may be generated by emergency construction operations (e.g., scrap, wood, pipe, and wiring) and office and field operations (i.e., refuse). S.S. Waste Sampling Procedures 3.3.1. Samples analyses will include toxicity characteristics (benzene only), reactivity, ignitability; and other analyses, as necessary. S.S.Q. Samples will be collected in pre -cleaned glass containers and stored and transported in specially designated portable coolers. These supplies will be provided by the analytical laboratory. Analytical Laboratory: TBD Company Name: TBD Company Address: TBD Phone: TBD Fax: TBD Contact Name: TBD S.S.S. Containers will be labeled with date and time, sample type, sample location, unique sample number, and the samplers' signature. The contract analytical laboratory will provide labels. 3.3.4. Samples will be collected with the assistance of a clean scooping device ice such as hand trowel (either a one-time disposable or a device that can be decontaminated between each sample). Reusable sampling equipment will be decontaminated with isopropyl alcohol and water between collection of each sample. Nitrile gloves will be worn during collection of each individual sample and changed between samples. 3.3.5. The samples will be stored in the field in chilled coolers. The samples then will be moved to a refrigerator or delivered to an analytical laboratory within the sample holding time specified for the analytical methods selected. Proper chain of custody protocol will be followed (refer to section 5.1.3). 3.4. Sampling Guidelines For oil sampling, the following guidelines will be used: • Third party contractors will be used to collect all neat and contaminated material samples. Third party contractors will be used to gauge all tanks containing oil -water mixtures. • Samples will be collected in pre -cleaned glass containers provided by an accredited analytical laboratory • Containers will be labeled with information such as the date, sample type, and sample locations. • Solid material type samples (e.g., PPE) will be collected with the assistance of a utility knife or scissors. Liquid type samples will be collected with the assistance of an appropriate liquid sampling device. • Sampling equipment will be decontaminated with isopropyl alcohol and water and thoroughly rinsed between each sample collected. • Nitrile gloves will be used for sample collection, and changed between samples to prevent cross contamination. * All spent sampling equipment and contaminated material associated with sampling will be consolidated, containerized and moved to the waste staging area. • Proper chain of custody protocol will always be followed. 4. Accumulation of Hazardous Waste No permits are needed for collection and temporary storage of hazardous waste in an emergency oil spill clean-up as long as waste is properly contained, labeled, and stored. Storage requirements for hazardous waste are more stringent than for non -hazardous waste. A hazardous waste storage area inspection form should be used to document that waste was appropriately managed. Generators of hazardous waste must obtain a state/Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) identification number since hazardous waste may not be shipped off -site without an identification number. The Plant does not anticipate being categorized as a Hazardous Waste Generator. 4.1. Management of RCRA-Regulated Waste Many hydrocarbon products contain benzene, which can be considered a hazardous waste under the RCRA toxicity characteristic rule. As a result, oily waste (excluding marine diesel fuel- contaminated wastes) that cannot be recycled/reclaimed will be analyzed for hazardous characteristics before choosing a treatment or disposal option. Standard procedures approved by RCRA regulations for sampling, analyzing, and monitoring oil and oily waste material will be utilized. Representative samples will be collected and analyzed for hazardous characteristics (ignitability, corrosivity, reactivity or toxicity) by the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) to determine if the waste should be handled as hazardous. If oily waste is determined to be hazardous under RCRA, the wastes will be sent to an EPA- or state permitted hazardous waste management facility for treatment and disposal. If the material spilled is itself a RORA-listed hazardous waste, any resulting spill residue is automatically a IOl-listed hazardous waste. 5. Interim Storage, segregation and Tracking This section provides information on the interim storage of generated waste, includes guidance on the segregation of different types of waste to facilitate proper and efficient management, and provides waste disposition tracking forms. 5.1.1. Locations for Temporary Waste Storage Areas Temporary waste staging areas (Waste Staging Areas) will be established in the following locations. • Waste Staging Area Location Number 1: TBD It is important to show how each site will be constructed, bermed, or covered to minimize rainwater infiltration and leaching. Site details will be added, as applicable, to the Waste Management Plan once determined. 5.1.2. Waste Inventory Label all containers (bags, drums, roll -off boxes, totes, dumpsters, etc.) with the following information: • Type of material (oil boom, absorbent pads, etc.) • Location (waste generation site) • Date • Name any phone number of contact person • Include the term "Recovered Oil- (put type of material here, such as sand, PPE, debris) Contaminated Material." Oily wastes will be placed in leak -proof containers to prevent leakage during handling and transportation. The containers may be 55 -gallon drums, portable tanks, tank trucks, roll -off boxes, dumpsters, storage barges, or containers that can be sealed and covered to prevent spillage. Double -walled plastic bags may be used for this purpose or all oil -contaminated materials can be double -bagged and tied or closed with duct tape. Not more than 20 pounds of debris are to be placed in each double bag. Each container of collected debris will be labeled as to its contents (tar balls, oily debris, or non -oily rubbish). Similar waste types should be staged together as a key task in the spill response segregation strategy. 5.1.3. Chain of Custody The transporter of the generated waste shall provide Plant personnel a copy of the Chain of Custody (COC) form. The COO shall contain at minimum the following items: • Name of Plant Personnel Handling Waste transfer • Date waste was generated • Date waste was picked up • Description of the waste • Description of waste container • Name of Transport Company • Name of Transport Driver • Location and Name of Disposal Facility • Signatures and Dates of both parties involved. The Plant will maintain copies of all COC's involved with waste generation and transfer. 5.1.4. Segregation 5.1.4.1. Contaminated Soil Contaminated soil and shell material can be stockpiled in designated lay -down areas. Stockpile areas underlain with visqueen and covered with visqueen or other sheeting may be required to prevent rainfall infiltration and runoff. Stockpiling of contaminated soils should be viewed as a temporary measure, as the soil will eventually be containerized for off -site treatment and/or disposal. Soil will be characterized and stored as per direction from the EHS Department. 5.1.4.2. Oiled Organic Debris Oiled organic debris includes wood, grasses, aquatic vegetation, and similar organic matter that cannot be treated and restored. Oiled organic debris should be segregated from dissimilar debris and containerized in clear plastic bags, so the contents inside can be viewed. This material typically is designated for disposal at an approved solid waste landfill, 5.1.4.3. Oiled Debris Oiled debris includes equipment and materials that are not deemed to be treatable or material that cannot be returned to its original service* Oiled debris will be containerized in 55 -gallon drums or roll -off boxes and/or dumpsters. This material typically is designated for disposal at an approved solid waste landfill. 5.1.4.4. Contaminated Sorbent Material and PPE Contaminated sorbents (absorbent, booms, pads, wipes, etc.) and PPE will be containerized in plastic bags, drums, roll -off boxes, or dumpsters as appropriate. Plastic bags, taped closed and stored in roll -off boxes is the preferred technique, 5.1.4.5. Contaminated Rinsate Water from Decontamination Stations Contaminated rinsate from personnel or equipment decontamination areas will be containerized in open top 55 -gallon drums fitted with bung -sealing lids. Contaminated rinse water and other oily water generated during the spill response typically will be transported by vacuum truck from points of generation of frac tanks and portable oily water storage tanks supplied by the oil spill response organization or oily water reclamation contractor. 5.1.4.6. Hazardous Waste Hazardous waste will be kept in designated areas within the temporary waste staging areas. Hazardous waste will typically be containerized in drums or visqueen-lined roll -off boxes with volatile organic compound (VOC) controls, if necessary. Hazardous waste will not be co -mingled with non -hazardous waste. The Plant does not anticipate any generation of Hazardous Waste. 5.1.4.7. Non -Oiled Waste Generated from Spill Response Activities Non -oil waste material includes trash generated at the Plant that cannot be recycled. Non -oiled waste will be segregated from any oiled waste into a trash dumpster located at the facility. Hello