Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20181836.tiffSUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Tuesday, June 5, 2018 A regular meeting of the Weld County Planning Commission was held in the Weld County Administration Building, Hearing Room, 1150 O Street, Greeley, Colorado. This meeting was called to order by Chair, Terry Cross, at 12:30 pm. Roll Call. Present: Bruce Johnson, Bruce Sparrow, Gene Stille, Lonnie Ford, Michael Wailes, Richard Beck, Terry Cross, Tom Cope. Absent: Jordan Jemiola. Also Present: Chris Gathman and Michael Hall, Department of Planning Services; Lauren Light and Ben Frissell, Department of Health; Evan Pinkham and Hayley Balzano, Public Works; Frank Haug, Attorney, and Kris Ranslem, Secretary. Motion: Approve the May 15, 2018 Weld County Planning Commission minutes, Moved by Lonnie Ford, Seconded by Bruce Johnson. Motion passed unanimously. CASE NUMBER: USR18-0033 APPLICANT: PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO PLANNER: CHRIS GATHMAN REQUEST: A SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT FOR A NON -1041 MAJOR FACILITY OF A PUBLIC UTILITY OR PUBLIC AGENCY (A 115 IW TRANSMISSION LINE APPROXIMATELY 1.75 MILES IN LENGTH) IN THE A (AGRICULTURAL) ZONE DISTRICT. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: S2 OF SECTION 2 EXC LOTS A & B REC EXEMPT RE -2429; LOTS C AND D RECX12-0003, BEING PART OF THE S2 SECTION 3; LOT B RECX13-0096, BEING PART OF N2 OF SECTION 2; ALL IN T3N, R66W OF THE 6TH P.M., WELD COUNTY, COLORADO. LOCATION: GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF CR 36; SOUTH OF CR 38; EAST OF CR 31; WEST OF CR 35. Chris Gathman, Planning Services, stated that the legal notice did not include the alternate routes; therefore, staff is requesting a continuance to the June 19th Planning Commission hearing to allow adequate time to renotice. The Chair asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for or against the continuation of this application. No one wished to speak. Motion: Continue USR18-0033 to the June 19th Planning Commission hearing, Moved by Tom Cope, Seconded by Bruce Sparrow. Vote: Motion carried by unanimous roll call vote (summary: Yes = 8). Yes: Bruce Johnson, Bruce Sparrow, Gene Stille, Lonnie Ford, Michael Wailes, Richard Beck, Terry Cross, Tom Cope. CASE NUMBER: USR18-0016 APPLICANT: KEN & MARKAY COSPER PLANNER: CHRIS GATHMAN REQUEST: A SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT FOR ANY USE PERMITTED AS A USE BY RIGHT, AN ACCESSORY USE, OR A USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW IN THE COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL ZONE DISTRICTS (STORAGE YARD FOR COMMERCIAL PLAYGROUND AND PARK EQUIPMENT), PROVIDED THAT THE PROPERTY IS NOT A LOT IN AN APPROVED OR RECORDED SUBDIVISION PLAT OR LOTS PARTS OF A MAP OR PLAN FILED PRIOR TO ADOPTION OF ANY REGULATIONS CONTROLLING SUBDIVISIONS IN THE A (AGRICULTURAL) ZONE DISTRICT. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT A REC EXEMPT RECX16-0082, BEING PART NE4 SECTION 27, T7N, R67W OF THE 6TH P.M., WELD COUNTY, COLORADO. 1 l_.-45mMc_3n; cati on 5 Co/Ig,/l$ 2018-1836 LOCATION: WEST OF AND ADJACENT TO CR 21 AND SOUTH OF AND ADJACENT TO CR 78. Chris Gathman, Planning Services, presented Case USR18-0016, reading the recommendation and comments into the record. The Department of Planning Services recommends approval of this application with the attached conditions of approval and development standards. Mr. Gathman noted that Staff is requesting a screening plan and added that no letters or correspondence have been received from surrounding property owners in regard to this case. Evan Pinkham, Public Works, reported on the existing traffic, access to the site and the drainage conditions for the site. Ben Frissell, Environmental Health, reviewed the public water and sanitary sewer requirements, on -site dust control, and the Waste Handling Plan. Ken Cosper, 2143 River West Drive, Windsor, Colorado, stated that he has been in business for 15 years and added that he sells and installs commercial playground equipment, picnic shelters, and shade structures. He added that they are using this site for storage of trailers, skid loaders, augers, and equipment associated with installing these units. Mr. Cosper stated that he would like to install a fence around the storage site. The Chair asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for or against this application. No one wished to speak. The Chair asked the applicant if they have read through the Development Standards and Conditions of Approval and if they are in agreement with those. The applicant replied that they are in agreement. Motion: Forward Case USR18-0016 to the Board of County Commissioners along with the Conditions of Approval and Development Standards with the Planning Commission's recommendation of approval, Moved by Tom Cope, Seconded by Bruce Johnson. Vote: Motion carried by unanimous roll call vote (summary: Yes = 8). Yes: Bruce Johnson, Bruce Sparrow, Gene Stille, Lonnie Ford, Michael Wailes, Richard Beck, Terry Cross, Tom Cope. CASE NUMBER: USR18-0005 APPLICANT: DONALD WILLS PLANNER: MICHAEL HALL REQUEST: A SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT FOR A USE PERMITTED AS A USE BY RIGHT, AN ACCESSORY USE, OR A USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW IN THE COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL ZONE DISTRICTS (DRYWALL BUSINESS- INCLUDING THE STORAGE OF EQUIPMENT AND COMMERCIAL VEHICLES) PROVIDED THAT THE PROPERTY IS NOT A LOT IN AN APPROVED OR RECORDED SUBDIVISION PLAT OR LOTS PART OF A MAP OR PLAN FILED PRIOR TO ADOPTION OF ANY REGULATIONS CONTROLLING SUBDIVISIONS IN THE A (AGRICULTURAL) ZONE DISTRICT. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT A REC EXEMPT RE -4113, BEING PART NW4 SECTION 22, T7N, R67W OF THE 6TH P.M., WELD COUNTY, COLORADO. LOCATION: SOUTH OF AND ADJACENT TO CR 80, APPROXIMATELY 0.45 MILES EAST OF CR 19. Michael Hall, Planning Services, presented Case USR18-0005, reading the recommendation and comments into the record. The Department of Planning Services recommends approval of this application with the attached conditions of approval and development standards. Evan Pinkham, Public Works, reported on the existing traffic and access to the site. Hayley Balzano, Public Works, reported on the drainage conditions for the site. Ms. Balzano requested an amendment to Condition of Approval 1.B to read "The applicant's engineer shall update the submitted Drainage Narrative to be signed and stamped by a Colorado Licensed Professional Engineer". 2 Lauren Light, Environmental Health, reviewed the public water and sanitary sewer requirements, on -site dust control, and the Waste Handling Plan. Donald Wills, 9488 CR 80, stated that he has a drywall company in which the employees arrive in the morning and then they go to various job sites and return in the afternoon/evening. Commissioner Stille asked if there is any noise, lighting pollution or dust issues. Mr. Wills said that there is a mixing truck that operates for 20 minutes. He added that he has asked his neighbors if they have any concerns and added that most of them didn't know he had a business. The Chair asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for or against this application. Phil Sweeney, 39256 CR 19, stated that he lives a half mile from County Road 80. Mr. Sweeney said that he has talked with the applicant about his employees driving by his place at a high rate of speed. Additionally, he questioned the number of employees he has as the applicant's website shows 35 employees. Mr. Wills said that he will continue to remind his employees to slow down. He stated that he has 30 some employees but only seven (7) employees come to the shop everyday. He added that the remaining employees go directly to the job site. Commissioner Wailes asked if there is another route that they could take to avoid driving by Mr. Sweeney's place. Mr. Wills said that there is and Mr. Wailes suggested that they do that. The Chair referred to the suggested amendment to Condition of Approval 1.B, as requested by Staff. Motion: Amend Condition of Approval 1.B as suggested by Staff, Moved by Bruce Sparrow, Seconded by Bruce Johnson. The Chair asked the applicant if they have read through the amended Development Standards and Conditions of Approval and if they are in agreement with those. The applicant replied that they are in agreement. Motion: Forward Case USR18-0005 to the Board of County Commissioners along with the amended Conditions of Approval and Development Standards with the Planning Commission's recommendation of approval, Moved by Bruce Sparrow, Seconded by Gene Stille. Vote: Motion carried by unanimous roll call vote (summary: Yes = 8). Yes: Bruce Johnson, Bruce Sparrow, Gene Stille, Lonnie Ford, Michael Wailes, Richard Beck, Terry Cross, Tom Cope. CASE NUMBER: USR18-0009 APPLICANT: LESLIE ANN WINDYKA PLANNER: CHRIS GATHMAN REQUEST: A SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT FOR A KENNEL FACILITY (FOR UP TO 17 DOGS AND 2 CATS) IN THE A(AGRICULTURAL) ZONE DISTRICT. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT A REC EXEMPT RE -2174, BEING PART N2SE4 SECTION 20, T5N, R64W OF THE 6TH P.M., WELD COUNTY, COLORADO. LOCATION: NORTH OF AND ADJACENT TO CR 54.25 AND APPROXIMATELY 2,100 FEET WEST OF CR 53. Chris Gathman, Planning Services, presented Case USR18-0009, reading the recommendation and comments into the record. This USR was applied for to address a zoning violation. Mr. Gathman indicated that this the second USR applied for on the property for a Kennel. The previous USR application (applied for under USR-1433 to address a zoning violation) was denied in 2003. Because it has been more than five (5) years since the previous case was denied a new USR can be applied for. Mr. Gathman indicated that Planning Services, Zoning Compliance and Animal Control visited the site. Mr. Gathman noted that the applicant indicated during the site visit that she was over on the number of dogs since her application was submitted in Fall of 2017 as some of the dogs had grown older than 6 months. He added that there is a 3 Condition of Approval that prior to recording the plat, a site inspection be conducted to verify that the applicant is in compliance with the animal units (17 dogs and 2 cats). Additionally, there is a Development Standard that requires compliance on an annual basis by providing written evidence. The Department of Planning Services recommends approval of this application with the attached conditions of approval and development standards. Commissioner Wailes referred to the previous application that was denied by the Board of County Commissioners and asked if this applicant has been in violation since 2003. Mr. Gathman deferred that question to the applicant. Mr. Wailes asked how that violation was resolved. Mr. Gathman said that when a case is denied, Zoning Compliance would then perform an inspection and verify that the number of dogs are reduced to the number allowed as a Use by Right. He added that this violation was opened in 2017. Mr. Wailes asked if she is allowed four (4) dogs as a Use by Right. Mr. Gathman said that she is allowed a total number of seven (7) dogs and cats combined. Commissioner Wailes asked if the dogs have been inside since 2003. Mr. Gathman said that the applicant has made that statement. Evan Pinkham, Public Works, reported on the existing traffic, access to the site and the drainage conditions for the site. Ben Frissell, Environmental Health, reviewed the public water and sanitary sewer requirements, on -site dust control, and the Waste Handling Plan. Mr. Frissell suggested removing Development Standard 13 and 19 since the applicant has removed the auto repair business from the request. Leslie Windyka, 25621 CR 54, stated that she is a disabled retired teacher. She stated that with the help of the State of Colorado's Rehabilitation help, she undertook three separate projects including raising Mini - Rex Rabbits and raising Beagles. Ms. Windyka stated that after 2003 she boarded the dogs over the required limit at a local Veterinarian. She added that PACFA changed their regulations and told the Veterinarian that he could no longer board her Beagles. She said that she took the dogs back in 2004 and then in 2006 they were taken to Iowa. Commissioner Wailes asked how many dogs are currently on the property. Ms. Windyka stated that she has 22 dogs, but after dog placement she will be below the required 17 dogs. She added that she has 6 rabbits, 2 cats and no horses; however, she is planning to raise horses in the future. Commissioner Stille asked how the horse rescue will affect the USR. Mr. Gathman said that she can have up to four (4) horses per acre. He added that this request is not currently included in the USR. Mr. Stille asked the applicant how she will exercise these horses. Ms. Windyka said that she was told that if she uses hay during the winter months she will be fine. The Chair asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for or against this application. Rod Williams, 25641 CR 54.25, stated that he lives east of and adjacent to the applicant and added that the white fence in the pictures is his fence. He emphasized concerns noise, property values, and odor. He understands that the commercial junkyard was withdrawn; however, he is still concerned with the gas and oil from the vehicles and the tire storage. He provided pictures of the site from his residence. He asked how she is disposing of the waste. Josh Pleaslee, 25704 CR 54.25, stated that he lives southeast of applicant. He is concerned with noise and property values. He asked how the ditch will be maintained with the waste from the dogs. Additionally, he is concerned with the proper care of the animals and that the applicant is in constant violation. Judieth Hillman, 25644 CR 54.25, stated that she is concerned with property values. She also owns dogs and horses and what it takes to maintain care of them and is concerned with the proper care of all the animals the applicant has. Although the vehicles are not part of this, she is still concerned with pests, mice, rats, etc. that can live in those vehicles. She inquired if the applicant has liability insurance to have a kennel. 4 Sharon Shaffer, 25580 CR 54.25, stated that she has a copy of the Resolution from 2003 stating what the denial was about. She provided a brief history of the violation and the timeline since 2003. She provided a picture of the vehicles on site. Ms. Shaffer said that upon this recent inspection there were 24 dogs inside the house and nine (9) dogs in the kennel. She added that the applicant's screening consists of sheets blowing in the wind. There are totes beside the dumpsters and they can only assume it contains animal feces. She asked if the applicant has liability insurance for these dogs if they were to get out and hurt someone. Lisa Williams, 25641 CR 54.25, stated that since they have been living there she has heard the dogs but has never seen one dog outside. She said that there are more than five (5) cats that come under her fence from the applicant's property. She has seen bags of waste recently and didn't see it before. Diana Clark, 601 1st Street, Kersey, Colorado, stated that she has owls and hawks that nest on her property and asked how the dogs will affect these nests. She asked the applicant to be courteous to the neighbors who listen to the barking and take that into consideration. Jean Stoll, 25615 CR 54.25, stated that she is concerned with the property values and added that they built a large garage to block the view from the applicant's property. She is concerned with the dogs barking and the appearance of the property with the fence and the vehicles. Kathy Berryman, 405 1st, Street, stated that she is one of owners of Berryman Farm. She stated that she was in opposition in 2003 because of the noise. She submitted a picture of the site from her property. Ms. Berryman said that with the proposed buildings and additions it sounds like it will be a compound. She commended Ms. Windyka for trying to rehabilitate animals; however, it does need to be in compliance. The Chair referred to the suggested changes to the development standards. Motion: Remove Development Standards 13 and 19, Moved by Tom Cope, Seconded by Michael Wailes. Motion carried unanimously. Ms. Windyka said that they have until July 24th to build fences and they intend to have them installed by then for the vehicles. Ms. Windyka stated that there is a pile of bunny doots that she spreads on her property for fertilizer and added that she would entertain the idea of moving that pile to another location on the property; however, it will be distributed this summer. Ms. Windyka addressed the audience and said that if they are using any ultrasound in the area that will irritate the dogs. She added that according to PACFA standards, each of the dogs have a certain amount of enclosure and she is making sure that they get the care they need. Ms. Windyka indicated that she wants to install a dog exercise area in the side yard area of the property versus along the ditch (as indicated on the site map submitted with the application). The Chair asked the applicant if they have read through the amended Development Standards and Conditions of Approval and if they are in agreement with those. The applicant replied that they are in agreement. Commissioner Cope said that the animals are based on one (1) acre of land; however, he asked if it is based on one (1) acre of usable land because the vehicles take up quite a bit of space. He added that the applicant needs to understand that she will get herself into trouble again if she wants to start bringing in other animals as this property is not an acre of pastureland but rather an acre taken up mostly by buildings, structures and abandoned vehicles. Mr. Gathman said that the code does not clarify that but states that a number of animal units allowed based on the size of the property. Frank Haug, County Attorney, stated that is part of the consideration for the Planning Commission to make regarding compatibility. 5 Motion: Forward Case USR18-0009 to the Board of County Commissioners along with the amended Conditions of Approval and Development Standards with the Planning Commission's recommendation of denial, Moved by Gene Stille, Seconded by Michael Wailes. Commissioner Stille cited Sections 23-2-20.A.1, 23-2-20.A.3, 23-2-20.A.4 and 23-2-20.A.7 due to incompatibility. Mr. Wailes cited Section 23-2-20.A.3 and 23-2-20.A.4. Vote: Motion carried by unanimous roll call vote (summary: Yes = 8). Yes: Bruce Johnson, Bruce Sparrow, Gene Stille, Lonnie Ford, Michael Wailes, Richard Beck, Terry Cross, Tom Cope. Commissioner Johnson supported the compassion of the applicant but it is a nuisance to the area and is not compatibile where it is located. The Chair called a recess at 2:51 pm and reconvened the hearing at 3:07 pm. CASE NUMBER: USR18-0019 APPLICANT: ANADARKO E & P COMPANY LP, C/O KERR MCGEE GATHERING, LLC PLANNER: CHRIS GATHMAN REQUEST: A SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT FOR MINERAL RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT FACILITIES, OIL AND GAS SUPPORT AND SERVICE (CRYOGENIC NATURAL GAS PROCESSING FACILITY); TWO (2) 24 -INCH AND ONE (1) 16 -INCH NATURAL GAS PIPELINES TO BE LOCATED ON THE PROPERTY; AN ONSITE SWITCHING STATION/SUBSTATION AND A 150 -FOOT COMMUNICATIONS TOWER IN THE A (AGRICULTURAL) ZONE DISTRICT. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT B REC EXEMPT RECX13-0096, BEING PART N2 SECTION 2, T3N, R66W OF THE 6TH P.M., WELD COUNTY, COLORADO. LOCATION: SOUTH OF AND ADJACENT TO CR 38 AND EAST OF AND ADJACENT TO CR 33. Chris Gathman, Planning Services, presented Case USR18-0019, reading the recommendation and comments into the record. Mr. Gathman indicated that the proposed facility has three (3) high pressure gas pipelines on the same property as the proposed gas plant. The proposed resolution therefore has a separate set of criteria for the pipeline (per Section 23-480 of the Weld County Code) in addition to the standard USR criteria delineated in Section 23-2-220 of the Weld County Code. Mr. Gathman stated that the applicant had contacted DCP regarding the potential for location on their 100 -foot tower approved under 5MJUSR17-83-542 as an alternative to their proposed 150 -foot communication tower. Anadarko indicated DCP has only a 35 -foot tower at their site and are unsure when or if the height will be extended to 100 -feet. Mr. Gathman noted that one (1) email and four (4) responses were received in opposition to this case. The concerns outlined were the amount of oil and gas facilities in the area, increased amount and concentration of noise and air pollution in the area, traffic, and the haul route. The applicant has hosted seven (7) meetings with the community since November 2017 and intends to have ongoing meetings with the community. The Department of Planning Services recommends approval of this application with the attached conditions of approval and development standards. Evan Pinkham, Public Works, reported on the existing traffic, access to the site, improvements agreement and the drainage conditions for the site. Ben Frissell, Envionmental Health, reviewed the public water and sanitary sewer requirements, on -site dust control, and tie Waste Handling Plan. Nathan Keiser, Anadarko Petroleum, 1099 18th Street, Denver, Colorado, stated that to understand the community concerns they have hosted several community meetings. The community was concerned about health, safety, sound and visual barriers, light mitigation and property valuation. Mr. Keiser noted that they are required to have Air Permits in place and maintain all necessary emissions reporting requirements. He added that information is available to the public through the appropriate agencies and the facility is monitored by video surveillance and staffed 24/7. The community had asked for a 28 foot wall; however, after some research they have found a 25 foot wall matching the color scheme of the surrounding area. 6 Additionally, they will include landscaping for decorative purpose since the wall provides the primary screening. All lighting will be engineered utilizing dark sky standards. It will be designed to minimize the required lighting needed to safely operate the plant during all times. There will be an essential lighting system and a demand lighting system. Mr. Keiser stated that all compressors will be electric and will be enclosed in insulated metal buildings. Additionally, the 25 foot wall will act as a sound wall. The site will operate at 55 decibels during the day and 50 decibels at night. They will also develop a communication plan during all phases of permitting, construction and operations. An online portal will be created to share specific information of the proposed facility and there will be an Anadarko Colorado responsive line. Mr. Keiser said that water will assist with dust suppression during construction and Mag Chloride applications available if preferred by community. They will work with the community on signage. The construction will nustly take place during the daytime hours. Commissioner Ford referred to the wall and asked how many acres this will enclose. Mr. Keiser said it would contain 60 acres. The Chair asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for or against this application. Dennis Nagel, 16311 CR 38, emphasized that anything that was discussed should be included in the USR, for instance the wall. He added that he has learned that if items are not included in the USR, the applicant isn't required to do them. Gerald Johnson, 16274 CR 33, stated that the community should be tested. He has lived there since 1965 and some of the community has been tested for benzene and other heavy metals and they have been tested high. He is not adversarial to oil and gas but would like to see it done carefully and with some thought. He added that Anadarko should show that they are not hurting their property values. Doug Tschudy 16955 CR 33, stated that Anardarko has done a good job of negotiating in good faith. The concerns they have today is that what is filed in the USR has to be binding as he is concerned with the cumulative effects of all of the oil and gas facilities in the area. He stated that the roads are horrible and are a safety issue. Roy Wardell, 16512 Essex Road North, reported on the traffic and haul route. He suggested dividing the traffic among the roads. Marcy Trescott-Helmck, 16059 CR 38, stated that this application needs to be amended and continued. She is on a well and is concerned with her drinking water. She is a property appraiser and is stunned that the facility is located on the rise instead of further to the east closer to County Road 35. She indicated that tons of oil and gas vehicles are using County Road 38 and the sound level from existing facilities already make it difficult to carry on a conversation outside. Tom Cope left the meeting at 4:03 pm. Terri Dechant, 18488 CR 33, stated that she is concerned with her quality of life. There is already a lot of noise in the area from existing oil and gas operations. She would like to see everything written and included in the USR. Connie Nagel, 16311 CR 38, stated that she wants to ensure everything that is said and discussed will be required. She is concerned with the quality of their water. Commissioner Sparrow asked if the 25 foot wall is in the development standards. Mr. Gathman said it will be submitted with their landscaping plan. Mr. Keiser said that as part of their application they have submitted a mitigations plan that includes the wall. 7 Commissioner Sparrow asked the applicant if they have an idea of where their traffic is coming from. Mr. Keiser said that the majority of traffic will be coming from Platteville. In response to the Planning Commission's inquiry, Mr. Gathman suggested amending Condition of Approval 1.C by adding "The Plan shall include a 25 foot screening wall around the facility" at the end of the paragraph. Motion: Amend Condition of Approval 1.C, as suggested by Staff, Moved by Michael Wailes, Seconded by Gene Stille. Motion carried unanimously. The Chair asked the applicant if they have read through the amended Development Standards and Conditions of Approval and if they are in agreement with those. The applicant replied that they are in agreement. Motion: Forward Case USR18-0019 to the Board of County Commissioners along with the amended Conditions of Approval and Development Standards with the Planning Commission's recommendation of approval, Moved by Bruce Sparrow, Seconded by Lonnie Ford. Vote: Motion carried by unanimous roll call vote (summary: Yes = 7). Yes: Bruce Johnson, Bruce Sparrow, Gene Stille, Lonnie Ford, Michael Wailes, Richard Beck, Terry Cross. Absent: Tom Cope. The Chair asked the public if there were other items of business that they would like to discuss. No one wished to speak. The Chair asked the Planning Commission members if there was any new business to discuss. Commissioner Johnson reiterated that he would like to have the County find some avenues to following up on USRs to verify if they are in compliance. He is not sure that he likes the idea that Staff is not able to report violations. Meeting adjourned at 4:36 pm. Respectfully submitted, Kristine Ranslem Secretary 8 Hello