The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20182426.tiffINVENTORY OF ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION Applicant Verdad Resources, LLC, d o Nick Holland with Cureton Front Range, LLC Case Number USR18-0022 Submitted or Prepared Prior to Hearing At Hearing 1 Surrounding Property Owner Leeann Ribble, letter dated April 10, 2018 X — 2 Surrounding Property Owner — Carson Ribble, letter dated April 11, 2018 X 3 Surrounding Property Owner Robert Paul, email dated April 13, 2018 X — Surrounding Property 11, 2018 Owner — Carson Ribble, email with pictures dated May4 X Surrounding April Property 12, 2018 Owner — Carson Ribble, COGCC complaint report dated5 6 Surrounding Property May 15, 2018 Owner — Carson Ribble, NRCS site visit minutes dated Applicant Surrounding Response Property — Email correspondence Owners between the Applicant and7 X 8 Applicant May 2, 2018 Response — Terracon Desktop Constraints Analysis (DCA) dated X 9 Applicant flyer Response "What is a compressor — Presentation from the April Community meeting and X station?" 10 Presentation from the applicant X I hereby certify that the ten items identified herein was submitted to the Department of Planning Services at or prior to the scheduled Planning Commissioners hearing. Diana Aungst , Planner 24639 County Road 6 Hudson, CO 80642 April 10, 2018 Diana Aungst Weld County Planning Services 1555 N 17th Ave Greeley, CO 80631 Fax: 970-304-6498 Complaint and objection — Case# U R 18-0022, Parcel # 147519300014 Tiger Compression Station Dear Ms, Aungst: I am opposed to USR 18-0022_ My husband and I purchased our property, off of CR 6, a number of years ago. One of the greatest features of our property is the ability to go out in the mornings, sit on our porch, and listen to the lions and the bears at the Wild Animal Sanctuary while we have our coffee, We also watch our horses, our cattle, and the cattle up the hill graze. It's truly a pastoral and peaceful experience. We have great views, fabulous neighbors, and a nice neighborhood . My family and I, like our friends and neighbors, have homesteaded here We are committed to seeing this culture and ambiance maintained I have reviewed the application referenced above. The applicants called out the variety of zoning in the area, to include commercial, agricultural, industrial, and some homes, My search on the Weld County Property Portal showed that this was an AG -A zoning area only. I have included a screen shot below for your reference . Additionally, the applicants seemed, in their "Engineering Questions" section, to be confused about where they were proposing placement of the gas compression station, describing routes as using "Highway 8, then south on 49 to the site" and, alternatively, they say, "County Road 6 to 49 and then south,' neither of which is an accurate representation of ingress/egress for their proposed site. I have a number of concerns at this time regarding this application Property values 2. Noise 3. Safety / Fire 4 Environmental impact 5, Impact to ag tourism in the area Impact to traffic and road conditions 7.. No benefit to our community Consultation with a realtor with heavy experience in this area has shown that placement of the gas compression station — which will be practically in our backyard — will have a large negative effect on our property value. We have requested our realtor compose a letter to submit that would outline the direct impact this would have, should it be approved. I will submit this as a separate email My husband and I have scrimped and saved and generally worked our fannies off for years to be able to move to a property that would support our animals and allow for us to raise our own beef, our own hay, and some vegetables. This property is an important part of our retirement plan and having the property values impacted negatively will set us back years. Cureton is proposing adding a 20' antenna, a 30' combustor, and a 50' dehydration tower, in addition to four generators. These vertical structures will easily dwarf anything in this area and will be a complete eyesore, Further, they indicate that they have proposed adding some light landscaping around the site for visual appeal. While I appreciate that they at least recognize the negative impact their facility would have on the area, I challenge them to describe how a 50' privacy fence needed to conceal the dehydration tower would be any Jess of a detractor Fencing will also not cutdown on the continuous noise expected to be produced from the facility. I am compelled to point out that the ambient noise studies that are being conducted, and will presumably be submitted, are NOT representative of the noise levels in our neighborhood. Currently, there is construction that is ongoing immediately adjacent to the site (pond); there is fracking in the area (incidentally causing a lot of sand in our domestic wells); dirt work has begun at the proposed site While we expect some construction occasionally, and tractors running seasonally, these sources of noise pollution are transient and are not at the same level as the 24/7/365 sound emissions that would be generated from this placement. The levels of ambient noise which will be reported to the State and the county will be artificially inflated. Safety is always a concern As we have seen in Dacono, even trained employees who are performing routine activities in relation to the natural gas pipelines have experienced adverse effects. Explosions are not on our list of things to experience. While Cureton has represented that they have an outstanding safety record, this covers only their 16 employees and none of their subcontractors. Further, they have only been established as a business since July, so this reputed "safety record" does not even include a full year of data per employee, and completely ignores what is happening and has happened in the field http:/tw.�kkty_comtlhorne/headlinest23744 1.html haps (tww. .denverpos:t.comI2017/04f o/firestone-home-e piosron-drilling-setbacks/ Iittp:f./ gad.com1201 112/0/father-son-killed-iin-northern-Illinois-pi Define -ex Dlosiont During a community meeting held April 5, 20181 representatives from Cureton indicated that there would be no exposed flame associated with the combustor. I find this difficult to believe as the process of combustion requires oxygen, and there must be a way to allow oxygen into the combustor. There is a tank setup on CR 6 which has an open flame visible, although it is contained in mesh I do not believe that the environmental impact of the proposed gas compression station has been evaluated thoroughly. Just on our property, over the last few months, we have seen ducks, geese, hawks, eagles, pelicans, herons, cranes, owls, coyotes, rabbits, and turtles. Geese and ducks both raise their young on our pond. We live at the confluence of two streams To our knowledge, there has not been anyone on our property to evaluate habitat, and if anyone has been on our property, it has been without our permission. Ag tourism is a major local economic driver with The Wild Animal Sanctuary attracting over 150,000 visitors yearly who traverse a 1,5 -mile catwalk that is outside, over pens containing the animal residents of the sanctuary. The outdoor experience and the ability to see animals in a larger, more natural environment is a huge part of the draw of this facility. Our neighbors, the Mazzotti's, farm and host seasonal events like a pumpkin patch and corn maze that draw people to the area. Other neighbors train dogs or horses, and several have home -based businesses that attract clientele to their properties. Noise pollution will impact each of these businesses adversely, which will, in turn, impact our economy and our collective bottom line. Road conditions on these county roads are abysmal at best, and they could stand to be maintained much more often than they are currently. By adding semi -truck traffic (which was represented to our homeowners as "pickup trucks"), we have a concern for the quality of our roads going forward, and the impact that the additional truck traffic will have. In short, this project provides nothing to enhance our existence, and promises to provide a tremendous amount of negative impact both subjectively, in terms of quality of life and annoyance factors due to noise, as well as objectively in terms of decreased property values and negative impact to our local economy. This is not the only location available or feasible for this compression station, and we would like to see this redirected to a more industrial area. Your site clearly states that your mission is to protect and enhance the quality of life for County residents through the implementation of the adopted Comprehensive Plan, Weld County Code, and Building Codes while providing professional, friendly and quality customer service to the community We are calling upon you to do just that, in protecting our property values, our quality of life, our peace, our associated noise concerns, and our community. Please support us by declining to recommend and by voting to deny the approval for the proposed Tiger Compression Station. Thank you for your consideration and for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Xila" 71g Leeann Ribble fl weld county c©mmissir~ x W Comrnissloners - Weld x fl weld DOLr,nly zoning • Y& x i� P: ()per LLI itt.ill. I Serap.? h itt(5c vimm ro weld.co.u5 r` .I. 'l 01 )1 c`I' 9 rrai• PIP 'Geld County nrma► AO' Virk0 COP, R11 P1 R1M tr.iinc;i ion ggzar f NI 4164Taw A lae M Show WELD inning A AG ,.. 9 _.1: U Li' - a Lint •' OType here to search Skater r C.,f'Ga.�P ai I Ccod C11nate5 r i y `b Odle' C-IP I" 14 i t . Don1 Display Again x ODI l,N S ra C Q'� 1 iPM tr'1 4!i0/211 1 April U, 2018 Diana Aungst Weld County Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Ave Greeley, CO 80631 Fax: 970-304-6498 Complaint and objection -- Case# U R1 -oo 2, Parcel # 147519300014 Tiger Compression Station Dear Diana, We are filing a formal complaint and objection to the issuance of a special use permit for the proposed Tiger Compression Station, Case # USR1S-022, located on Verdad Resources, LL's property. Our property is adjacent to this parcel, our entire western property line abuts the Verdad Resources, LLC property, roughly 2700 ft of frontage. Complaint #1. Lack of meaningful information. To date we have attended a community meeting hosted by Cureton Mid -Stream, LLC, and have requested information via email. A copy of the information disclosed is attached. The meeting was well attended by the neighborhood. The only hard facts we received at this meeting is that Cureton Mid -Stream, LLC wants to fast track this project. Request for the Environmental impact Study, Flood Plain Critical Facilities- Unfulfilled: During the meeting, we asked for a copy of the environmental impact study relating to the project, and the impact on the tributaries of both Box Elder Creek, and Horse Creek. (There is running water within 50' to 100' of the property line). We have not received this information from Cureton Mid -Stream. We are also requesting review under Article XI — Floodplain Management Ordinance, Critical Facilities -Hazardous Materials. Sound Study and abatement- Unfulfilled: During the meeting, and with follow up emails we have requested additional information. My email requested that they provide sufficient information and all of the details. Specifically relating to the ambient study, (Which they want to do this weekend), we requested general information on who is doing the study, qualifications and certifications of personnel, the specifications, regulatory requirements, operating procedures. We also requested a complete map of all of the proposed monitoring locations for the study. Currently we also have a drilling completion project going on and have high decibel readings of up to 71 on my meter, our normal is under 40 EXHIBIT GARSONRLBBLE- 24639 Wig 6 HUDSON, CO AO64 USR18-0022 Cureton Mid -Stream has not suppled sufficient relevant information for our review. What has been supplied is vague. We have requested submission of both timely and relevant information for our review. We are requesting from Weld County Planning Services time to review this information once it is supplied for relevance and completeness to complying with ARTICLE IX — Noise. Sec. 14-9-10. - Intent and applicability. A. It is hereby declared to be the intent of the Board of County Commissioners to protect the citizens of the County from excessive, unreasonable and unnecessary noise. B. This provision of the Code shall apply within the unincorporated territory of the County. We are requesting from Weld County Planning Services time to review this information once it is supplied for relevance and completeness. Complaint #2. We are an Unique Agricultural Tourism area. The 1-76 corridor project is a collaboration concerning this area's development, growth is going to be explosive in our neighborhood over the next couple of decades. Our area attracts people from around the world to come and see the Wild Animal Sanctuary and our other ag tourism business. We have greenhouse operations, pumpkin patches, and corn maize attractions. This area also has vibrant truck farming operations that supplies fresh vegetables to many urban areas along the Front Range of Colorado. Our Ag Tourism economy will be negatively affected by this heavy industrial zoning. An alternative for a compressor station is located approximately two miles to the north of the proposed site into areas already designated for industrial zoning. Move it next to the existing power plant. There are no positive outcomes in allowing this compressor station to be permitted at its proposed location. We are already seeing urban encroachment at the county line, and increased abuse of "Ag Zoning" for contractor yards, and heavy industrial uses. Allowing this project to be permitted will cause this area to be developed industrial. We can visualize that the next logical step would be for the owner of the property Verdad Resources, LLC to apply for a special use permit for an industrial contractor, and, or oil field rig yards on the same property. An example of this abuse is the contractor yard and shop built last year on WCR 2 between WCR 45 and WCR 47. The county has to take a hard look at this issue. An expansion of the Chapter 26 - Regional Urbanization Areas planning area concept might be a good starting point. We do not believe that this application meets the intent of the Sec. 22-1-120. - Comprehensive Plan guiding principles. GARSOjVRIBBLE 24639 WeE 6 HUDSON, CO 80642 ts:��'-1'l�N Complaint #3: inconsistency's within the Permit: The special review application that was submitted on 03/29/2018 was submitted by Cureton Front Range, LLC, a Delaware company with a Colorado Statement of Foreign entity authority filing date of 07/18/2017. The corresponding "Use by special review questionnaire" E -lot was prepared for Cureton Midstream, LLC, also with a Delaware company with the same Statement of Foreign entity authority filing date of 07/18/2017. All of our contact has been with Cureton Midstream, LLC, At question is what entity is applying for the application? There has been no representation from nor have we had any contact with an entity called "Cureton Front Range, LLC", We believe the confusion of entities presented within the application is just cause for rejection of the application. Because who are we really dealing with? Objections: within the CE -101 document we have several concerns that we are objecting to 1. This is a request for an industrial variance vailed as a drilling pad location variance, which is inconsistent with Section 22-2,, and as such they don't qualify for a subdivision exemption, have no Agricultural premise, and as such are not eligible for a special use permit. This, is a heavy industrial project that needs to be located where there is proper zoning. 2. The answers in" Use by special review questionnaire" are inaccurate. Surrounding land use is Agriculture with rural homes. The properties that adjoin ours have one abandoned well location that is located in the flood plain. There aren't any industrial or commercial properties in our immediate area. 3. Question 5 - Hours of operation: 24/7/365 — Lots of Noise! My decibel reading this morning was 44.4 on my meter. A drilling sites34 mile away gave us a reading of up to 71 while fracking, and last night the engines were running past midnight last night with a reading of 55. The decibels and frequency of the fracking operation this past Saturday into early Sunday Morning has already caused my tinnitus to become highly elevated. 4. Question 10. They stated that the location was under 5 acres at the neighbor meeting, this is inconsistent with what they have verbally discussed. 5. Hudson Fire District. Hudson is a small volunteer fire department. Additional provisions will be needed. 6. Traffic — They are quoting a location of CR 8 and CR 49. The site is east of CR 49 and north of CR 6 well south of CR 8. They do not know where they are located. We do not want them accessing the site off of CR 6, as they will be going right thru our neighborhood. GARSONR!BBLEH 246S9 WCR 6 HUDSON, CO 80642 7. Drainage Detention Pond —There is a large tank being built already North of the proposed site. Is this the detention pond? They have been very ambiguous as to project details. 8. Noise levels are currently extremely low in our area, we can hear the lions roar a mile away in the morning. We are very concerned about the noise. They are proposing "arctic type buildings", (cloth structures) in addition to the "landscaping, berms, and screening". I.E. a TENT. This solution it NOT adequate. lithe application is allowed to proceed, this issue must be addressed - the compressors and associated equipment must be housed in an adequately engineered sound proofed building that will contain the noise in a 24 hour per day, 7 days per week, 52 weeks per year operation. 9. Under Building Questions 2. There is an existing large pole barn building on the Verdad Resources property. In conclusion: There are serious errors in the application as submitted, We are raising a complaint and an objection to the issuance of a variance or permit for the submitted Special Review (USR) Application submitted by Cureton Front Range, USR18-0022 for both the errors in entity, and all the other reasons discussed in the objection complaint letter. If by chance this application reaches the hearing or review stage before any planning board or commission or the county commissioners; we are requesting a time slot to speak concurrent with the scheduled time and date of any hearing or discussion of this application. Sincerely, irt1 Carson Ribble Concerned Weld County Citizen C4ff50NR11313L& 24639 WCR 6 HUDSON. CO 80642 - 34ab0d0f16e35d884b5e6f8ac2139a I a 00 PEG Image, 488 x 319 pixels) littp://nebu lams i m g.com/34abOd0f16e35d884b5c6f8ae2 139a1 a?AccessKey1d=375DFF4F5... at. i 1 127:1-a TIPP BoisZT)TA6)-&" 1 of I 4/12/2018., 11.47 Ail C il`tan ? I idstIlla n :; l S r'"11) St. Suite 6 5{_1 nURETen\ MIDSTREAM March 2242018 Re: Tiger Compressor Station ppa r a,ndo ner, DATE and TIME CHANGE UPDATE Suite eir:1O Cureton Midstream LL ("Cureton") is a Denver based midstream company with more than 90 -years of combined management experience in energ t production. We sent you this letter because we have identified you as being an area property owner whose property is within 500' of the newly proposed Tiger Compressor Station ("Project`) for natural gasp We sent you a Getter on March 14, 2018 with a proposed meeting date. We have chosen to change that meeting's date and time to April 5, 2018 beginning at 5PM. We are doing this to provide you with more information than we would have been able to do so at our originally proposed event. We will also provide a brief, formal overview of the project with a chance for you to ask questions at the start of the meeting. Details for the meeting are listed below, We apologize for any confusion this may cause, but we think you will have a better experience and be better informed by asking you to wait one more week, As a reminder, we are proposing to build, maintain, and operate the Project south and east of the Town of Hudson, near the intersection of \NCR's 49 and 6, The Project will include a compressor station and interconnecting pipePines to compress and transport natural gas. The proposed Project is under the Use by Special Review process through the Weld County Planning Department and is subject to Air Permitting. It is important to us that we have good and open dialogue with you. This meeting gives you the opportunity learn about the proposed project, ask questions, and provide us your feedback4 we look forward to receiving. There will not be a formal presentation. Updated meeting date, time, and schedule: When: April 5, 2018 Schedule: 5:00-5:15P —Company Presentation 5:15-5:3OP '1 --Question & Answer Opportunity 5:30-7:00PM—open House with Project Experts Where: Best Western 301 E Bison Hwy Hudson, Co 80642 If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us toll -free at 1a833 CIJRETON (287-3866) or at irito@ci i rewnr ids real i ccii 1 Included with this letter is a general overview map of the proposed location for the Project We look forward to meeting you, Sincerely, Nick Holland Director, EHSR Curator Midstream ezdissie The, „kJ_ ss rtych. r T36lulls 13-41, 16 4 ivick if -dc f 321 9 811)(11 ti24c 10:61. op Hi" l A r /cc gSL In coun ‘,78- 7tja efi/neal- r t • What is a compressor station Compressor stations Provide vital step in natural gas transportation. They are necessary to move the has through the pipelines_ Without compressor stations there woold not be enough pressure in the pipe- line to move the gas. Compressor stations do exactly what their name implies, compress gas to charige the pressure Compression allows the gas to travel along, the pipeline route ntaiinin a steady flow. Technicians regularly visit the facility; however, compressor stations are designed as state-of-the-art un- manned facilities. These facilities are operated remotely, have remote shut down capabilities,, SCADA ,(Supervisory control and data acquisition) monitoring and 24/7 365 real time data. What happens in the compressor station? When gas enters a comr pressor station it flows through a separator. Sepa- 4rators are used to separate soita and liquids before the gas is compressed ISep rotors protect the compressor equipment from small cietris that might be in the product as i w flows through. The pro - Guess of compression creates heat as a normal part of the process. Howeverr the natural gas must be Goole before it goes back into the pipeline. The cooling system returns the gas to a transportable tern prig the final step of the process in a compressor or station. Once the temperat transport via the pipeline which will ultimately be piped to a distribution f ar homes, businesses and schools. How are compressor sta- tions regulated? To build, own and operate a compressor station in olora- do, an air permit is required through the Colorado Depart- ment of Public Health and .En- vironment. The compressor station is also subject to. the EPA's + ontrol Technie gikulaelineseandtlew Source "Irreripimiance StandardStandarga The ki Tiger Compressor station is subject to permitting with We td County for a Use by Special Re- view permit. The Use by Special Review, or U R, will be required before any construction can begin on the site. CURETONHICISTREAM ortivw,rige eo pre statiOn,Cern 1-833CURET0N Tiger+gCureton.Milda arn4cpm or 4/s/2o1s PubUc Outreach - Communication Channels Cureton will use multiple methods to communicate with you and to provide effective communication with landowneis ‘---F 1'4 D Mail: US Postal Service Prey Websita • EniaU H'„t ,i;r,:`,;.r�y�� (r-�r' ,'.�_. 143OO Number • T4211irRwne rturuber, 833. CLIRET0N (B33-287•-3Bfi5) • Projectwubsfte: tkgercor11pres JrstatIon.COrn Email Platform: Qi• directional Thank You Questions & Answers - MiCISTREAM 8 4/5/2018 USR Pei -nutting Schedule 2018 Application Submittal 1 -Day Ca rnpleteness Review Z$+Cid,r Referr& Parlad Planning Commission Heatfne 9.CC Hearing Proposed USR Schedule VAtiktlaSilanie Sst Cnmmurslty Meeting Estimated App mval ?PttJS1HHIP Feb Mar April Mav Jun Jut Aug Sep Oct MN Dec Final Plat Rtotalled (ampleted .' Completed [al In procern; 411040 ba doiermineci Ia be determined J-tt wtre'a All or SOCC apProvel 2019 Construction Schedule 2018 41.r. Feb•iuty Nis Permitting Construction Tiger Compressor Station Start Up Proposed Construction Schedule tvasc Eitirnated USR Appres rai P but Sep 2Ut Iir� 1491 INIOSTREat State -Up of Front Tiger Compressor b. Station CttrOet Z©18 2019 I 4/5/2018 to/0/Q1J, n C � tJ roil, 2O I kin Environmental Cons' clerotions Giouno Nevi Stoftwakkr • CUP:Lit)n'ifrr3 ,Udrd_+ t+1 rll�iL!t' ni nn.4g'eit i?itt Pc ;.r mcriacet GrathCC •, Cnginccred rirairagc anti ,r.niing p!,7'1 S1,crnv,atci fiti;ina i, 1rt[:rti n'Rr: and pourn:i �:: r r'L: Ron i. r ld p't'-5 r'.? :G4rd damn c terms SV' le, • rn`.r•t cbSi-t4 MIUSIHEAMM Mr Con,;,.4ccnt:c 1S Ru t('rl Poi rlrti.il E.re: s'cr':5 GutOcttl • rtegulyds ii office. (y irinit 4 FIJEILt'igz'cr'I1 UT,S ri'ng'ain C14SR f1 rvapr,d 5pitc»1s for gir, and liutdid .1 aev tr• itar ) ish /Ls) j_ The Tiger c;oriiftirc.ssor St.it c'rl is ice/b\frLoa Fri ttt�t: fC(1 COLORADO Der knmcttl t≥ Pu5'i- te:t;fi Sri=�rrlrlr.r,• t' ,�rrp6.� P y 4 p a i, Elbilialj { iiti 7 Emergency Preparedness Cuceton has engaged) emergency planners and first responders to ensure I Weld County Office of Emergency management - Roy i udisill lafrector) ud son Fire De n a amen, - Chief Ken Qabrielson (Fire Chief') On -Site facility walk. through (Pre -operations) *Annual rlcs table lop t3Kurc ises Emereencw Preoaradnass Partners Wetetcocrnty t<EFt ' V (ii„ maim 'Elio Cureton cQmn,kttedto • Reverse 911 for cell phones • Promote participation campaign m the community through collaboration with Office of Emergency Management and Hudson Fire 5 4/5/2018 tiiit;stib\m Tmbar Cornpr?ssor Station d8.sgrt Major components (Subject to Change) • 4 compressors • 2 20 6Bt_ Talus - Slug catcher • Separatr. r • tr•1eterIr�i 4 Dehydration equipment -- Small building, S+nall tanks, otlterassociated equipment and piping • Most equipment be hori7oruai arclo-Et: to ground level Except fon5 are the combustor at 3Cr tail and del)1sdratJc1n tower at 49' tell ▪ Combustor has an enclosed flame. #.e, not open floft?e5 • Operations: - 2.3 pickup ,rucks par days with occasional ~Hater truck. Facility will be monitored from Central facility seven miles to the north • PIA , -7-ruche, A j7i ,,,h l� 54 1/O4,ti ) Ifif- T rut •'1 - if Our Cortnrnitrnent to Safety, Envirornncnt, and Hearth trio 14i, T 'FR bilk1 I ►.11 cm.t•,it ri'eS an(,t COntrKlctM oii CI) (CUP' I eautirra are ar,, ti' nit kl tee G;eruust? Sup bYorxAutrottytc Corfimurucaic Su(CIItezuic�rn, In 2017, qui i m y cw pinTWA, li etajtc ribitk att.'ticnt per 113O work igi fit tt *%*" i Safuly e.; Nil! Ink, tiumnrete pedannente goes tap tb'he Otk 'i r&esettla' oorr1taritat'iOn ILu y',.}rrr'rSS,Irito- lei r.:pm r,1' allialtiTh Ballaiint Cc actctn *41 u!Itart'pinnacle gr utccbon, *moil pi sem& StrasoniG and MY tontil ti, {rrI.,ui,t prl,7pl'I CariV1a1 fl i' 11t al( tiafut'f ti3tc rn& SintillarielallIIMMel rCL>rr'•pllan.^1t1 each GS YtA Srmidst PnC S M _; 7 3C -•:r Pcniote sliutt.10Wri C. pali•rl',IR.'•i turin our Q -'s UkiIl1 CuttTrul ROCrr. Gat, Fha111 15 IuIcatc:d I Milt: sot Zhu rann DP5rtt manthil sh»t+d:nIrr' Ca %'r'Itit.K, Safe Standards 4.r P PjrlaJ 11tis1'Irrjiara, ft7.lh:l r};s 5Jlul•f !'r nrstrZi I ir-r, 4 PHMSA rtwr.-t n,r¢zh1/41 _ s 5 d1.1'' '.T, 'its nit 4t. Gcwpalicutai S i u tv anti lsediih renurito alaon /6 me/rat 5 4/5/2018 MIciTREAttii Why is LP is Project Needed? cos • Supports Cure!on's Front R rage Gas plant Project aimma Received W&cl County Board of County Commission Deprovel Feb, 28.2018 • Oil and Gas rtroducers m Welu County actiU u ly applying latest drilling tec ilrtolOgICs corm fitly 'improving wea G pcoducZwfl es New pipe k'ri es needed to gather and transport gels • Total Production outpacing ProcessIng Cupacity • New Proce ing opacity is necessary to et'fecti4&iy handle volumes both today and in the future F Safety and Waste - Legacy gathering systems were not designed to handle new voiunw and pressure for Horizontal \4leki County Production leading to over•pressured pipelines Tiger Compressor Project provides important infrastructure that supports all of the above • site selection ethnical: Close to future well pads Accessible power Along existing pipeline corridor 4 Cra Operations; Great road access Centrally located to gathering system e Tiger Compreiiar SHilfon WEISTRimiti a fe Permitting: Site located outside of Floodplain AIr permit has been submitted Zoned agricultural 4 4/5/2018 Whet Happens ;it d UE'crIpcc.iscn• Shhitri rl r 'r' `k ▪ 9 at I f .11.1t -t- ♦ • - • a t r. Ps L , 4 4li ar egi�. ,Jesigr,cd'Anti 2 90 as!le- et Traci Compaessor is currort r General Schematic Drawing for the Ttger Compressor Station. SUBJECT TO CHANGE Safety Pia n IV MIDSTREAM • Safety is of the Utmost Importance airy .cr1d!iticns; — Compressor station follows 49 CFR 192 and ASME 8313 • 49 CFR 192- Department of Transportation Regulation over onshore pipeline systems • ASME B31.3- American Society of Mechanical Engineers governance over process piping within facilities Operpt ons: 24/7 Control Monitoring- Trained pipeline control operators continuously monitor pressure, flow, temperature' and other operating data to provide real time oversight of operations Leak Detecti ono Computational Pipeline Monitoring (CRM )- CPM uses SCADA data to perform real time hydraulic modeling for leak detection. Emergency Response Plan- Cureton will have an Emergency response Plan in place that must be submitted to the county and state before operations begin. 3 4/5/2018 • Drilling • Completion 4 Production I ✓ Littering,. _ • Processing • Storage • Fractionation • Manufacturing • Distribution I CIF hiiiiSTREAM fAidstrean' Purpose In Weld County Cu reton Proposed Procekng Facility 1 a a 1 CIGj Xcel Energy Inter. Intrastate Pipelines asseisa a a Power Plant it 1111.1111 Local Distribution Company House Gas Meter Curetcn's facilities are key pieces far pro'Iag cost- efficient Energy In Weld County acid Colorado. Power Lines VI Kl�� ,:ric Meter (felt Elecmwiry • Rcfrngcrai�r • TV r, It Coati tl,!ior c -t Natural Gas Lifecycle; le; Wellhead to Markat, Cureto►n's Rote Downstream tirt I riabi MIOSFAEAM a t. �, r 2 4/5/2018 V"I ;#;"7-1. alb SI EAM 518 17A sung Ste 650 tr:nte:r CO 84242 (7ZQ: '290-4555 nttactf:elcim dstr am c*rn Tiger Compressor &tattar A V4t,c Is Curt:tcn • liti n c7 2 The CU rt.'tun1 matiagciru n1 Warn uonst5t5 of akin DO MEI of cpnwwin ud ez0e ends in ME. a'1i & ars i nduslr , Pr4'cot.s t"lfloicess'rc:ct74: ' \CALJBEP `. 1 a am tor tie " .. WILDCAT Weed Cou ay Headquarters to Keone bUlg, Colorado int 31631 County Road 398 aa'ntit•' Gz.`orodo Corporate MCI* Yin al, A r,3tut al gas gal non r.g ;,Ind pry r'ss' ng infra cyst Ial, ' Miastrcgarn System', located along the I-75 corridor ,it'Zia!'SC hit EXCELLENCE INTEGRITY TRUST r• MIDSTREAM 1. CM-0ton Mid .t�c�i� 518 17111 St., Suite ti 5O cu: c . CO 80202 URETD\ MIDSTREAM March 14, 2018 Re: Tiger Compressor Station �-5 !--`h ; L, (li ; u r ; ; ' , Dear Landowner, Cureton Midstream LLC rcuretoii") is a Denver based midstream company with more than 90 -years of combined management experience in energy production. We sent you this letter because we have identified you as being an area property owner whose property is within Soo' of the newly proposed Tiger Compressor Station ("Project") for natural gas. We take earning your trust seriously and we know the importance of community and the value of open and honest communication with nearby residents. That's why we want you to hear and learn more about this from us first. We are proposing to build, maintain, and operate the Project south and east of the Town of Hudson, near the intersection of WCR's 49 and 6. The Project will include a compressor station and interconnecting pipelines to compress and transport natural gas, Many of those pipelines currently serve Colorado and Wyoming customers; warming homes; fueling stoves; and providing clean energy to businesses in our immediate area and beyond. The proposed Project is under the Use by Special Review process through the Weld County Planning Department and is subject to Air Pei mitting. We genuinely believe that we estivill have a better project by having an open dialogue, speaking with you, and listening to your feedback. To help do that, we scheduled an open house; so you can come at your convenience; meet us; look at information about the Project and company; speak directly with our experts; take time to walk around the exhibits; and get the facts. This one-on-one approach gives you the opportunity to ask questions and provide us feedback that we look forward to receiving. There will not be a formal presentation. We chose the location, date, and timeframe, with careful consideration for your personal time and hope you will attend: March 29, 201.8 5:00-7:30 PM Best Western 301 E Bison Hwy Hudson, CO 80642 If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us toll -free at 1-833 CURETON (287-3866) or at in(ty'ur curetonnilddstrearn.corn Included with this letter is a general overview map of the proposed location for the Project. We look forward to meeting you. Sincerely, 4 Nick Holland Director, EHSR Cureton Midstream UREMIA MIDST REPM 518 17th Street, Suite 650 Denver, CO 80202 RIBBLE, NORMAN C RIBBLE, LEEANN P 24639 COUNTY ROAD 6 HUDSON, Co 80642-8809 NC Ribble From: Sent: To: Subject: Robert Paul <tbolttrucking@gmaitcom> Friday, April 13, 2018 5:05 PM carson.ribbleg mail.com Conversation with CuretonMid- Stream I spoke with David Ankle (303-888-3715) on Wednesday April 11 @ 3:08 pm Ambient sound testing. He stated that there would be testing Friday April 13 thought Tuesday April 16th, There should be several monitors one at the Northwest corner of our property, one at the South corner ofMazzottiTts property and another one in the center of the Northwest corner of your property. I have be looking around the property lines for the testing equipment and have not found any. Spoke to David Ankle again today April 13th @ 11:00 am. He stated the monitoring equipment was placed on Wednesday April 11th and is to be picked up today. Today at 4:30 when I got home I saw something next to where the proposed station is going to be. There is something that could be Ambient test equipment. Right next to the test equipment is all the dirt equipment for the pipeline, there is also a tractor setting right next to it. David also stated that Weld County Public Health Department has sent him an e-mail that says they will be regulated to 50 decibels day and night. They are planning on starting construction in 4-6 weeks. I feel like these supposed good neighbors are going totally different directions then what they are saying. Every time I talk to David he always has to look everything up on the computer and still can't get it straight. I don't know about you but I get the feeling this company is nothing but a circus. Bob 1 Diana Aungst From: Carson Ribble <carson.ribble@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, May 11, 2018 11:11 AM To: Diana Aungst Subject: Cureton site utility work Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Diana, Cureton has been working on site utilities for the past three days IMO 1 3 y%mil' j Carson Ribble 303-827-4031 iPhone message 4 FORM 18 Rev 8/2007 State of Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission 1120 Lincoln Street, Suite 801, Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 894-2100 Fax:(303) 894-2109 To — who — -. f a W a i Complaint Report This form may be submitted by any party with a complaint regarding oil and gas extractive operations. The complainant is to complete this form and mail to: COGCC, 1120 Lincoln St. Ste. 801, Denver, CO 80203 or fax to (303) 884-2104. COGCC will investigate the complaint and determine what action, if any, should be taken. Complainant Information Name of Complainant: NC Ribble Address: 24639 CR 6 City: Hudson State: CO Zip: 80642 Connection to incident (Land Owner, Royalty Owner, ect.): Home Owner Description Of Complaint Name of Operator: VERDAD RESOURCES LLG Date of Incident: 4/12/2018 12:00:00 AM Type of Facility (Well, Tank, Battery, Flow Line, Pit): LOCATION Well Name and Number: County: Was the operator contacted? N If yes, contact name: Category Assignesag OTHER Mike Leonard FOR OGCC USE ONLY Date: Complaint Taken By: ikenouyt API Number: 05-Nul-Null Facility ID: 451659 Doc Num: 200445741 Phone: 303,827-4031 Work: - Cell: Fax: - Email: carson.ritoble@gmail.com Date Initial Contact Made: 0G CC Operator Number: 10651 Facility Name: WARNER QtrQtr: SESW Section: 17 Township: 1N Range: 64W Meridian: 6 VERDAD RESOURCES LLC Complaint Issues Description Cureton? is constructing a gas compressor station on Verdad Resources farm without a permit. They are doing below ground construction work for the compressor station. It is not gas line work as they would like us to belleve.April 11, 2018 Diana Aungst Weld County Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Ave Greeley, CO 80631 Fax: 970-304-6498 Complaint and objection — Case# USR18-0022, Parcel # 147519300014 Tiger Compression Station Dear Diana, We are filing a formal complaint and objection to the issuance of a special use permit for the proposed Tiger Compression Station, Case # US R18-022, located on Verdad Resources, LLC's property. Our property is adjacent to this parcel, our entire western property line abuts the Verdad Resources, LLC property, roughly 2700 ft of frontage. Complaint #1. Lack of meaningful information. To date we have attended a community meeting hosted by Cureton Mid -Stream, LLC, and • have requested information via email. A copy of the information disclosed is attached. The meeting was well attended by the neighborhood. The only hard facts we received at this meeting is that Cureton Mid -- Stream, LLC wants to fast track this project. Request for the Environmental Impact Study, Flood Plain Critical Facilities- Unfulfilled: During the meeting, we asked for a copy of the environmental impact study relating to the project, and the impact on the tributaries of both Box Elder Creek, and Horse Creek. (There is running water within 50' to 100' of the property line). We have not received this information from Cureton Mid -Stream. We are also requesting review under Article Xl — Floodplain Management Ordinance, Critical Facilities -Hazardous Materials. Sound Study and abatement- Unfulfilled: During the meeting, and with follow up ernails we have requested additional information. My email requested that they provide sufficient information and all of the details. Specifically relating to the ambient study, (Which they want to do this weekend), we requested general information on who is doing the study, qualifications and certifications of personnel, the specifications, regulatory requirements, operating procedures. We also requested a complete map of all of the proposed monitoring locations for the study. Currently we also have a drilling completion project going on and have high decibel readings of up to 71 on my meter, our normal is under 40. Cureton Mid -Stream has not suppled sufficient relevant information for our review. What has been suppled is vague. We have requested submission of both timely and relevant information for our review. We are requesting from Weld County Planning Services time to review this information once it is supplied for relevance and completeness to complying with ARTICLE IX — Noise. Sec. 14-9-10. - Intent and applicability. A. It is hereby declared to be the intent of the Board of County Commissioners to protect the citizens of the County from excessive, unreasonable and unnecessary noise. B. This provision of the Code shal f a T 7 f f. ! '! ! al. Report generated on: 4112/2018 10:02:30 AM EXHIBIT 5 U 18-0022 FARM 18 Rev 8/2007 State of Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission 1120 Lincoln Street, Sate 801, Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 894-2100 Fax:(303) 894-2109 .. r. a. a. W . i .. _ s / i S S Complaint Report Other Notifications FOR 013CC USE ONLY Date: Report generated on: 4/12/2018 10:02:30 AM April 11, 2018 Diana Aungst Weld County Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Ave Greeley, CO 80631 Fax: 970- 304-6498 Complaint and objection — Case# USR18-0022, Parcel # 147519300014 Tiger Compression Station Dear Diana, We are filing a formal complaint and objection to the issuance of a special use permit for the proposed Tiger Compression Station, Case # U S R 18-022, located on Verdad Resources, LLC's property. Our property is adjacent to this parcel, our entire western property line abuts the Verdad Resources, LLC property, roughly 2700 ft of frontage. Complaint #1, Lack of meaningful information. To date we have attended a community meeting hosted by Cureton Mid -Stream, LLC, and have requested information via email. A copy of the information disclosed is attached. The meeting was well attended by the neighborhood. The only hard facts we received at this meeting is that Cureton Mid -Stream, LLC wants to fast track this project. Request for the Environmental Impact Study, Flood Plain Critical Facilities- Unfulfilled: During the meeting, we asked for a copy of the environmental impact study relating to the project, and the impact on the tributaries of both Box Elder Creek, and Horse Creek. (There is running water within 50' to 100' of the property line). We have not received this information from Cureton Mid -Stream. We are also requesting review under Article Xl — Floodplain Management Ordinance, Critical Facilities -Hazardous Materials. Sound Study and abatement- Unfulfilled: During the meeting, and with follow up emails we have requested additional information. My email requested that they provide sufficient information and all of the details. Specifically relating to the ambient study, (Which they want to do this weekend), we requested general information on who is doing the study, qualifications and certifications of personnel, the specifications, regulatory requirements, operating procedures. We also requested a complete map of all of the proposed monitoring locations for the study. Currently we also have a drilling completion project going on and have high decibel readings of up to 71 on my meter, our normal is under 40. Cureton Mid -Stream has not suppled sufficient relevant information for our review. What has been supplied is vague. We have requested submission of both timely and relevant information for our review. We are requesting from Weld County Planning Services time to review this information once it is supplied for relevance and completeness to complying with ARTICLE IX — Noise. Sec. 14-9-10. - Intent and applicability. A. It is hereby declared to be the intent of the Board of County Commissioners to protect the citizens of the County from excessive, unreasonable and unnecessary noise. B. This provision of the Code shall apply within the unincorporated territory of the County. We are requesting from Weld County Planning Services time to review this information once it is supplied for relevance and completeness. Complaint #2. We are an Unique Agricultural Tourism area. The 1-76 corridor project is a collaboration concerning this area's development, growth is going to be explosive in our neighborhood over the next couple of decades. Our area attracts people from around the world to come and see the Wild Animal Sanctuary and our other ag tourism business. We have greenhouse operations, pumpkin patches, and corn maize attractions. This area also has vibrant truck farming operations that supplies fresh vegetables to many urban areas along the Front Range of Colorado. Our Ag Tourism economy will be negatively affected by this heavy industrial zoning. An alternative for a compressor station is located approximately two miles to the north of the proposed site into areas already designated for industrial zoning. Move it next to the existing power plant. There are no positive outcomes in allowing this compressor station to be permitted at its proposed location. We are already seeing urban encroachment at the county line, and increased abuse of "Ag zoning" for contractor yards, and heavy industrial uses. Allowing this project to be permitted will cause this area to be developed industrial. We can visualize that the next logical step would be for the owner of the property Verdad Resources, LLC to apply for a special use permit for an industrial contractor and/ or oil field rig yards on the same property. An example of this abuse is the contractor yard and shop built last year on WCR 2 between WCR 45 and WCR 47. The county has to take a hard look at this issue. An expansion of the Chapter 26 - Regional Urbanization Areas planning area concept might be a good starting point. We do not believe that this application meets the intent of the Sec. 22-1-120. - Comprehensive Plan guiding principles. Complaint #3: Inconsistency's within the Permit: The special review application that was submitted on 03/29/2018 was submitted by Cureton Front Range, LLC, a Delaware company with a Colorado Statement of Foreign entity authority filing date of 07/18/2017. The corresponding "Use by special review questionnaire" CE -101 was prepared for Cureton Midstream, LLC, also with a Delaware company with the same Statement of Foreign entity authority filing date of 07/18/2017. All of our contact has been with Cureton Midstream, LLC. At question is what entity is applying for the application? There has been no representation from nor have we had any contact with an entity called "Cureton Front Range, LLC". We believe the confusion of entities presented within the application is just cause for rejection of the application. Because who are we really dealing with? Objections: Within the E-101 document we have several concerns that we are objecting to. 1. This is a request for an industrial variance vailed as a drilling pad location variance, which is inconsistent with Section 22-2., and as such they don't qualify for a subdivision exemption, have no Agricultural premise, and as such are not eligible for a special use permit. This is a heavy industrial project that needs to be located where there is proper zoning, 2. The answers in" Use by special review questionnaire" are inaccurate. Surrounding land use is Agriculture with rural homes. The properties that adjoin ours have one abandoned well location that is located in the flood plain. There aren't any industrial or commercial properties in our immediate area. 3. Question 5 - Hours of operation: 24/7/365 -- Lots of Noise! My decibel reading this morning was 44.4 on my meter. A drilling site % mile away gave us a reading of up to 71 while fracking, and last night the engines were running past midnight last night with a reading of 55. The decibels and frequency of the fracking operation this past Saturday into early Sunday Morning has already caused my tinnitus to become highly elevated. 4. Question 10. They stated that the location was under 5 acres at the neighbor meeting, this is inconsistent with what they have verbally discussed. 5. Hudson Fire District. Hudson is a small volunteer fire department. Additional provisions will be needed. 6. Traffic — They are quoting a location of CR 8 and CR 49. The site is east of CR 49 and north of CR 6 well south of CR 8. They do not know where they are located. We do not want them accessing the site off of CR 5, as they will be going right thru our neighborhood. 7. Drainage Detention Pond — There is a large tank being built already North of the proposed site. Is this the detention pond? They have been very ambiguous as to project details. 8. Noise levels are currently extremely low in our area, we can hear the lions roar a mile away in the morning. We are very concerned about the noise. They are proposing `{arctic type buildings", (cloth structures) in addition to the "landscaping, berms, and screening". I.E. a TENT. This solution it NOT adequate. If the application is allowed to proceed, this issue must be addressed - the compressors and associated equipment must be housed in an adequately engineered sound proofed building that will contain the noise in a 24 hour per day, 7 days per week, 52 weeks per year operation. 9. Under Building Questions 2. There is an existing large pole barn building on the Verdad Resources property. In conclusion: There are serious errors in the application as submitted. We are raising a complaint and an objection to the issuance of a variance or permit for the submitted Special Review (U R) Application submitted by Cureton Front Range, U S R 18-8022 for both the errors in entity, and all the other reasons discussed in the objection complaint letter. If by chance this application reaches the hearing or review stage before any planning board or commission or the county commissioners; we are requesting a time slot to speak concurrent with the scheduled time and date of any hearing or discussion of this application. Sincerely, Carson Ribble Concerned Weld County Citizen NRCS SITE VISIT 2@ RLCC's DIAMOND BAR C 24639 CR 6 HUDSON CO Meeting Minute! Date of meeting Present: 1. Overview List of Invitees: Carson Ribble Owner St Manager RLCC. LLC Deric Clemons District Conservationist NRCS Linda Poflick Civil Engineering NRCS Rod or Rep Henrylyn .igation District Billy PiAihelich Central Water Conservancy District Weld County Planning and Zoning Neighbors Welcome to our home, the Diarnond Bar C Rauch situated In the Horse Creek Valley of Weld County Colorado- This is a unique 68.63 -acre farm that raises cattle, horses and hay. Our water rights are teed to our irrigation pond located on Horse Creek, and we currently farm approximately 20 acres of alfalfa. Other land resources utilized are the Panhandle Pasture 10 acres, home, sheds & pens, shop/ of`lice, and house area - 14 acres. Approximately 45 acres in farmrng and ranching activities. The remaining 23 acres contain the Box Elder Ditch, and the Horse Creek Ditch. Entrance area over Box Elder Ditch 5 acres, the oldpond area - S acres, Horse Creek Pond with Picnic area — 8 acres, East Buil pasture — 5 acres, and the horse creek ditch reclaim area 2 acres, Our primary objective for this NRCS sire visit is to get specific recur niendatrans and cost sharing abilities for the S acres management area"Entrance area over Box Elder Ditch", and "The old pond area" the pour draining section of the Box Elder Ditch encompassing approximately 10 acres. This is a manmade problem that was created by abandonment of several small dams along the Box Elder ditch bottom, Specific areas we would like to discuss are: • Habitat improvement • Removal of cattaLls & creation Q18 channel for improved flow Removal of FPMissian Olives & vegetative control Fencing Irrigation 3 EXHIBIT 6 USRl8-002 NRCS SITE VISIT zig RLCC's DIAMOND BAR C24639 CR EHUDSON Co Meeting Minutes, May 15, 201 Page 2 Tour the "panhandle" and the confluence of the Horse Creek Ditch & the Box Eider Ditch, Our main issue with utilizing this pasture is lack of good fencing and a culvert crossing over the ditch, ■ Fencing • Culvert placement Management Areas & Other owner supplied information 1. 20 acres Irrigated alfalfa field 2. 10 acres Panhandle Pasture 3. 14 acres House, Barn, Shop & Pens 4: S acres Entrance over Box Elder Ditch 5. 5 acres Old pond area 6, 5 acres East Bull pasture 7, 8 acres Horse Creek Pond & Picnic area 8. Reclaim area spoils deposit area 9. Recorded Exemption No. 1475-19-4 RE -.4844 May 2009 10. 10.1 & 10.zStevens Diversion Structure in 2017 water reports II. 11,1 & 11,2 FEMA Flood Maps 3. Discussion Jai ;K) 4 is 161 b- CJtoo„Ie Mar4 9TIL Go gle M lragene TP2018 GQd9le, Map data '2['t H GoogIe ZCIO ft a s 24639 Co Rd 6 Iiiitps: leviiV's L ooL Ic.conn1/'maps l ac'c• 21-b.141 1. I Oa.... i l!iiclktiii_ •(A 1301)1 2 rr-IO.'ii3 4I 7 f?'.- I041_5'J.kil 2. fi k1!dlat... f11 -CAL c;.1.! Zpee armS_ 14 2LI I it I 2:36 I:'M 2-1()34 C RAJ - (itr 1ttMc I\ Lir'''. Home 24639 Co Rd 6 Hudson, CO BC1642 At thus location Diamond Bar C Ranch/ Pibbhe Land & Cattle Co. (1) corporate Office 24539 Co Rd 6 2 or2 I>Iill)s_ .t.goc ul Ititi:1I :& ruck' 4(► 14 -Ca Rd • • I lonbon.'('C )- lM 112 ri4U752.-101 .544482,IMF': 111 Measure distance Total area 767,7q15 46 FPP (71,330.5" m2) /'7, i 'r4s Total distance: 4,55410 ft (1 S9 km) 1-1,24113.. 112:35 � 1 46i y9 Cu I.< c1 t - { iuMottlk• l ia.JTs Gocgie ' iii -my.„ 24639 Co Rd 6 Iilliy '+►.ti, .L.wEnn)12,1t2.Unm linljy'IttiCL '2-11139 41,1) !midsnie. £ t._ 11 Nan -12 ritA-IC)11 1)7)2.- I04.5946Sr. IO1 r,r`Ia1,... apt, /''c, e rep iniavery 02018 Go le. Man data, '.r'2(.1,18 G wjl.`e 2DL fi 5:14 24118. 12:4i) I'C'I 24639 Cu Rd C' a G.uogle Maps Home 24639 Co Rd 6 Hudson, CO S0642 At this location Diamond Bar C Ranch/ Ribble Land & Cattle Co. 5.0 (1) Corporate Office - 24639 Cc Rd 6 I. 2 Meutuie distniwe Total area: 43q,333.48 ft' (40,815 42 ml Total distance: 3,066.66 It (934,72 m) ii,iepw p'Iaci: $(1_40Cc) Nd E,. I ICI ) • S(btb_1= e :Iii ;(17:41 104.504011"1.1I Ill Dui 5 I -:I .200 :. I '519 I'\1 4 ) Co Rd6-{boogie �~kips Imagery !c 2(J I H Gocgte. Map data si42 61 20t it Goc;ge Maps 24639 Co Rd 6 Pifi s• h tiff brit Ii:', 0111 iriaappsplUIcc• 24031A • 1 41 ltd ° (\• I I0 J:soli. • ( I ) - 06-1 �' if -#41.O,3l 5i',7.- I04M_5cfl0:25,362ni ,data3a 124 eetrueireS Sill -120U8. 12:5,2 i°1%1 h 'titiw n.2,0002.Pt2.com:nr:rl1s"171:ucc12i1)_319., l'0st Rd rI IIidn TM. I ( M--:SO-12. 0.0 ► 1554 I I.la. � -ISIS . +_'�iu tLLta... Home 24639 Co Rd 6 Hudson, CO 80642 At this location Diamond Bar C Ranch/ Ribble Land & Cattle Co. 5. 1) Corporate Office - 24639 Co Rd c� Measure distance Total area 540/492/4 r-12 (50,21 e3 m') Total distance: 2,865.46. ft (87329 m) s 11201:. L. 1.46 .39 Co Itd [.1-Googie Maps ,4 Go gle Maps 24639 Co Rd 6 I iii: hips: WWatsW. U[ gIe.cort"'props'plaice'2-III3') Co • Rd , 6, , I ludIslnl. - CC)' I16 -s2 RI, 'A 1)329606,-11J493�75959, 86,3,nu,.r tfrieret.ice are — gape gj r- Creek_ mete (fist Att' igety CO K GGnogl&, Mz p' deit?!Googlt 2W) i1 � I-1 201 t.14 1:419 I'M -'-4- 39 Co Rd 1', {etX14II: Maps 111f'1ti, ' IA %Ins"LIictig! t'naim1. place 2.463i)'to' Rd J o. I la��j��►ai. CI 831 o R -1(1.(1311060(1.- ICIt593(1 59,.W j111 it;LI;s , Home 24639 Co Rd 6 Fludsari, CC 8O642 At this location Diamond Bar C Ranch/ Ribble Land & Cattle Co. 9 0 C 'l Corporate Office - 24539 Co Rd ,6 Measure d'istntie Total area 200,726.04 ft7 (1%391.20 na l Total distance: 2$31.65 ft (863.09 m) 5. I4/211I8. 1:09 PM 21630 CI, fail 4i - thi-ttidl- NaLip , , Go gie Mips 24639 Co Rd 6 I or: Imps: '•"%% t1•,gut gkc,con 'maps 'pI,ice Ikfd4 ns' CO 8O64.214$4f.O J3I I ,5.-1fl4.59rt&,I.86}mArita... lost, Ares :Sac rtS Imagety V2018 Gc ogIL, Map data i02016 Goac4fe 200 r1 S7I412COM I : a I PM '4WD(nRd( -(lothItke i'i.i'. Home 24639 Co Rd 6 Hudson, CO 80642 At this location Diamond Bar C Ranch/ Ribble Land ,& Cattle Co. 5.0 (1) Corporate Office - 24639 Co Rd 6 111II) . 'A %%. ,t)f.1dc6.tf111 11145'+ 246:t9 ' Co Rd ° (.. I tilUstom. CA). ; IMi9--$ 1r .10.4L;13 3 I I _- I IP.,.!_5-V3).(li#i I . & 3i1i M tin sure distance Total area: 214300.51 f1? (199899.88 m2) Total distance: 3,225.25 ft 083_06 m) +n.I'20I8. 1:01 PM ?4& 1t} co ltd C, - C icti1Mo, Go gle Maps 24639 Co Rd 6 I1lij ti: '‘%t tit-."OL? '+I:"_'LIYlll miry IrLLc Th-1Po 0$. to (3. I IIIi'mit', -1 r p�l.4 IICl-I-50-330 5{.a.& i3mll O.6+ S� c itmoire c -goo pews -Lee) Imagery t2O1R Glands, Map data 't;2OOI#3 Gongle 200 I'1 ur2 5/ 20 I S. 1 :02 PM 2'46 y9 Co Rd ta. — (;iiti le Maps Home 24639 Co Rd 6 Hudson, CO 80642 At this location Diamond Bar C Ranch/ Ribble Land & Cattle Co. 5.0 (1) Corporate Office - 24639 Co R.d 6 0 hitps: Acww,r0+ 1 l `.cr lfb'I11k$psi pI4tCC '"4(301-' ►-6. + F I LnI%vI1, ! :106.1 2: (1-14.1J1 3&0ki,- I tP-#.5,939759..8((.111, C1 11t.r Meontire dast®nc Total area° 236,644 77 ii' (21,96,5.02 m ) Total distance: 3,338..20 It X1.02 krn) 514 201.8c 1:132 IA\I 246719 Co Rd l'. - (iopq!Ie Mop -107 I ,M Go ge Maps 24639 Co Rd 6 Imps: www.guLlizle.com 'mails piacc 2-1Cs 9- Co ° Rd 6, I ILIJSt)i1.. ` (1) E(s612 rr -10.0? .020006.- cl:il8,,. Po e gRat c Ai 2. Arem Sara 'warty 12,018 Gengle, Map 'data Karl Goode 2'AC (M ICI"'(I IN. I:03 IPM 246:1,9 CoilPosl - Mars, Home 24639 Co Rd 6 Hudson, CO 80542 At this I oc n t i on Diamond Bar C Ranch/ Ribble Land & Cattle Co. 5.0 07) Corporate Office - 24639 Co Rd 6 2 or1" 2 hdqrs : �fl\:ti%..i.4o.1;i.JL•.Caipal III rs, olact.• 11639•('it Rd 46_FHudson, C:( ) 2 �r HI,I ti?I�r"xa�t,, b��,l_SLJ 4.17'SI),841 il,1 Measure ail tc sae Total area,. 364,272 6E3 f!3 (33,842 474 rn7) Total dIstanc e: 2,9 1,8C ft (911,cc mj -1 21) I I:03 PM wo klaps4kg Irnagery v201 fl GODgle, Map data' 2O I ti Doodle 20D tt gie Isv l A p► 9 :c- Rd hips votr,xti googIc,c°c}.ni iii;ipstract'21 13 9 , Co. Rd +f. I Iiidsom • CO • • 0642'id 40.o; I L) .l.-10-). q— I?-'7..86•iai tI i 1 Irak" t ' I, rc'+. 2 t1.c r°tS 5„ 14;201 K. I : I I PM .1;9 o c - Cough: Maps Home 24639 Coid6 Hudson, CO 80542 r� 1 thi5 location Diamond Bar C Ranch/ Ribble Lard & Cattle CO, Ccrpnraie Office - 24&39 Co Rd 6 Mips: xw 'o, w'4.",� ��I ,�•�tit11 siiap . 2-16 34,1 !4. •u$ ^ Rd • oh. • 80642 Ii.40.031, 0.C I , I'JCJL1. • I 01.5:q3 1727.803i1i .., Measure distance TC Lai area. 76,44187 It' .(17,1: ©1.77 rte) Tctal distance: 2,159 03 ft (6543.07 nn) gb. 2 514,21 1:8. 1:11 PM 'IZ h 1!Qr" or. CS 4 tannin Pa i IL LOT A DO.ORAS MI! Win a a 14 a_a ro a CURET if FrIL • I 44- 491 lart DETAIL •! .9 LOT A & r 'RM & RANCH imp E "WV I .M 5L 1 CM* a LO l fJ tijitiA A !elLiir4 p i+FP431R Ort aa girl ill twwla tit Malta'a) t�aMJD:M EAS(M►ENT RECORDED EXEMPTION No. 1475 - 191--4 RE --4844 A R€CCROED fxZlaPrltN Or LOT E. M --3464. LOC KO '131 Rot 5%U1 +EA.S? ! y CF SLc51CI.1 19. W WiSHiP I. NORTFM, RiaNOt 64 'WEST of !FIE 6t:`s :. WLLe [OuN1L COLORADO ga.ec a OF Z. hill f 4 li is 5 ►b I, . iPa 'R qe rig its *.[ vrworial-raliv�Y iriivinv_`. ;1/4.. _ ! t ]I! LC' L trIt Jpc T RLa[i W Ai11 #EfiM ii PEP, .Ifr„l aswea i WI 14 "w an Maim tar di Mal isa rip im Ir K" .aY ? - qt.' ' 1 `La. ' r r^ mitt'iha. arsnrfl 'U rl' • barirwrirt sn rr ROAD 6 gun* NS tan r'dr :' ir. Cia ,i {a4" (dell.,i't WWII!! 41. 1 L01 B t$0v`d447 4a 41 a(`M s akin 11L 1.1 ;sCE1 a Ida twit r raeti . r OA! 1,, 4 Ma : ha Sails) Jr P14' dint. riff Pi µµ Clot L3 Ii3SS } 1' veinal t:4a s tf1,S4-e aJ s la' 11w oven I 414 Y gr aa* 1 V 11.1 ti.: Moo .r 4,thal pa tramcif L'. l It 'he i r Saw .aa Iila iN ji ni Kim IQ Ra', .ser l.r aarl MOON • I.Ci.Il11+ •I 141 �lCa#Cal PUP l' uKlrht a►a spat e.m41t1 Sr Utak Moo" Sec! -4l=laa Mc- .ap Lavinia PILL r: 1r!1a 3. i t 51 •1 S.s d„ °a I a+ 3. r_ d. -. 4i p r QIn By a 2 PAZtw kt, '4 i t n le a-• a of /Di CC1 la"` i 1 -e `COI siteatc Out 01 priority Structure Name: Stevens Diversion Structure Na I Ninny, Antirevicht Address: 24639 W C: Ptiocie: 3W46-46CCIJJiUr 0:3-� ��4ciy e; ail; dop t rthit1a d:.nd rSott r . L& f iAlgaliOtt SE of SE of SetliMil I'; .ta wnship; IN Range.: ! Source Home Creck (Matt take al niona iI i�a %ern) the abm c information and update an) masking or incorrect data.) V,-I)IJ)- J0;S4 (*fly.. % Zip.: Hudson. CC) SiC16-4' ,_1 `' ��.��.. w 3 g Dews Water tJ r: Plesec cie iln5 torn anal ciater lux ai i lc13 a n a i a d Shan ra a n ri ti''-'. Sterling, CO r 51 - FAX a970.923956.,. I`rirui�i.��raratJt'J �rL•.ra<.si:jrc.cu.ns by I)ecember x].2016. 1 1 l Jc Mkmc � u your Water C �r toner to Ir'' ' . ' 24 I a my: f'or 3-c' 1ttune from our of 1 u I�,� y: T! �� pc.'i�� ;Ir) c'ij` I,iL.` tk7.i. Di9rrskr J Car rnahtiicr wr: EV211 ISra der r )i c . _ Br�nc- P { �.�1� �I�«��''�. 1 I�ir'I l i►-, gin I] � �� °� �°� ��;ltea.., 7>r-1'113• 1i11'isr You tan ab c! reach thou by tallish the orrice number bekniv.. Diversion records providtNilotic usage recoils of your warcyr right and beip prptert it from abz xdonment. I am asking that you compietie t -a15 Corm and return it `lo D c ci i a, a t- r 31“. t� not you insect water t water year . ten years of nctnercport1f7*" rl;arm-1. ie 1 lIf� .g mmticnated value for your water u%a t . 'ntg er year art No a ibex 1, 2015 a n d ended October 31, 2016. If you no lunge( out c ur...`, this ,is wafer ri i h i know{ *0 that i can update my records.. I.t 'r r Maw Ohs; the trtitivo `) asvr Vsed Nut )lt'astrrcd - • r your vi i ' 6011 is utilized f _l r ... I •rv: _ :i ntiliwg Wiz. %% mitt sed Not Measured: it. J? Flu 'jt: 1)IiinIa: I IN?. :\1eicr ° Sulu;.JJc.r. IAid l 't ej' ~'city Wadi n 4 elude gage height and t,' lurne on nu:intik bit lmet PLEASE DI' ATE GAGE EIGHT ANT) STORAGE tN ACRI. T-1-1" -- t !yI to I` _ ! _ 4L It v &fit ' NC's l DEC 1 ..31 tti S FEl 1 1; I _.,IDI .1 .i',,ti j 13 ` I I r-i j? -a ,1 is Ifs r - r4ci-i ;Ha trwil fhb yar POWs espiatio *thy: (mak JIB that app vt A ma of r. • 1 -the per 2 r c-' c /c re 4 Water was available but none ; -a%, tat ,'n 0th Ez- • Tl nkin y tkt t!i adviincr for your prompt attention to this matter.. Any elu ii `.ti;, pi c f ;`:i ire . to cc.niact 'Shama Sandridge COmmo Colorado Division of Viola R . J :T 000 Broadway, Ste, 1-firSlerunp fir, ; U751 ( a) 97 0,522.f390 (Fax) 9704522.5950 nrrigkesamiaidwt, -21! iu9 tat in the re--,:ord.. -..nib report - ill show whether -or abli n i onn.. I1m). Please pmvide either zi zucas.ured .�,. i MC grAIC rr,:ealea, rr' ,— i'se Sia I Water Year 2017 Water Used Not Measured: AtA Type of Flume: di PM 't WDID; 100842 Structure: Stevens Diversion Structure No. I Name: Ribble, Carson & Leeann Address: X 24639 WCR 6 City: Hudson, CO 80642 Phone: 303427403I Cellular phone: E -Mail: carson.ribble@grnaiil.com Location: SE / of SE 'A of Section: 19 Township: IN Range: 64W Source; Horse Creek (Please take & moment to verify the above information and update any missing or incorrect data.). Dear Water User. Please complete this form and either mail` fax or attach as email to: Sharma Sandridge Coleman, 100 Broadway, Ste. I -D, Sterling, CO 80751 FAX - 970.522.5956 i shanna.sandrid eel stair.ra,us by December 31, 2017. Providing your email address will enable us to processthis mailing electronically in future water years. Also, if you did not do so last year, please contact your Water Commissioner to arrange a time for someone from our office to complete an onsite visit. District l Commissioner: Evan Snyder cell: 970.520.0491. District 64 Commissioner: Bruce Phillips Bell: 970.370.0296. You can also reach them by calling the office number below. Diversion records provide historic usage records of your wader- right and help protect it from abandonment. I am asking that you complete this forte and return it by December 31m to be included in the record. This reps will document whether or not you used water this water year. Please provide either a measured or estimated value for your wafer usage. The water year began November 1, 2016 and ended October 3I 2017. If you no longer own or use this water right please let me know, so that I can update my records. Please utilize (he option "Water Used Not Measured" if your water right is utilized for livestock/wildlife or natural irrigation of native grasses. y d 0 T 0 S . ( I C61‘..41.0evhbain ! el, 4.. .Ler 94 tiLida £L/�. ! TS, c rc ., tit ft /lac Ac le: Size: -t " Pump: Flow meter serial number. Ai (al'/gal) Meter Multiplier: Start reading End reading Total Reservoir Readings include gage height and volume on monthly table below. PLEASE INDICATE GAGE HEIGHT AND STORAGE IN ACRE FEET BELOW: MAY I JUN I JUL 1 AUG I SEP I MID NOV I DEC I JAN I FEB I MAR I APR. I OCT 31 I I G. HT i Y F if water was not used this year please explain why: (mark all that apply) No water available Out of priority Water was available but none was taken Other Thanking you in advance for your prompt attention, to this matter. Any questions please feel free to contact me. Shanna Sandridge Coleman Colorado Division of Water Resources 100 Broadway, Ste. l=D, Sterling, CO 80751 (Office) 970.522.5390 (Fax) 970.52 .5956 shanna.sandridre@state.cu FIHNI.`\ '%:J,t\Papaia I PN Iriaa ge., I.11Ol 111 '5(1 pixels) - Scaled UP��N Willl ID NM w.•tarn I* •• medal at se OY er. SS.M. 14 area ease es ant r•+a+. e�q 3.1 M 'a- era MM' FJa /.- 1. sd, aar .. _. _. • n•la_y. i at;- Qtr.. 1•a: rat Sa� a. aH . pas.. l - aal.a fa SW ae•to. t• ai Fa• "atIn Sal rInt wan-. i--0-• ng1 -••••••• M•• 4 ty •try 1a -•i pit-,` •a s-'za In r a a a is re Ks anal a art r•r • S :.a Sat. i--en -s• p- ,.r .. '7. 4-. _ _ r-1 -- /.• a•a asl •l'a•taaaa a -t -_— Y ft • AIM • 4" —till` n ->!a l a• el le nen as • R 'a a r= nee ' It S• • a sap au asa. as •t is • - M'w' • +•aa•r Ifni•, tar NMI 4w i uAS SINS Ny t..4.f-iY 4 +t1a,. - i p is {a a a ne sata sten NI •444. ma nee —•s.t- was w +a fa an east as to a ea a.•— eat ••&r ele fat nett'ttae 7a4 a i ti ar.—acai -,'1a S.g...a...a* af7 Inn Sent. On 44 Orafi imitablaS.11 t...ea S. It • to a ^411••14! 'a aa+ill., `se es t S.i jai. lG owe Inning Lana tee •.•M 1 esMte Sae nfl • '1 a • a Ina al •a It 1 \i• ••M tart tett • tfi tnn rural.- 't.e-a t ^'a' eat • a7ta te raat of •Mt !Witt a r ne n all /t at •a• u•aa sac a •• anent sue•• a as O. •;tit ream...--- r r f..-rsrt.e eta • MI as es an .4 ea •ate— ...a's'. •aa S. es iaat• ess i_• • *4 •4 •a .te•' rf -a in- • a fa M a',. -'a S a S Waif a r L as . awas alai Ls 1 a Gi aaa�Y «f. "Len nitt 4.- •a It le ••ta a elf I S. is t !rte.- d. _ _. -..•!il•Y�� as • en as .••t•..a aaaa ss as'- — i sa II 'a•aa at a .- • a is nal•-! eat ea Mar s se. traI• arias- es nese 'gyp! elIne - -t ,. -s Sant ---- er-3a - lintattatn en."aaa -t as 5% !r en • On aR a Ma • eer .aa a . -e >+•'1a t t 0a YrT a- -a '•11 T# sa ant .s as's nis as Inn a a4 teen a int-en II4:ae £ tees . •a t. eon- nil a aaa a i tt= 'a I -a r W — ii are cri - a...� na• the a .r tat* sea e.win w !!a rant s.•- r ••••••; r .. - .• to a. an • --•a. . tent• inn twat a • ...a.an a nanna•it fa - 1 • - Z a lid l — t_ — i_ - a a. .Za %ea I— s • a .ate• 1 • at a craft gat sc zs naa,s�- e 1 - •1-a • -ea as Tea asa a •av 7a - . .ateeta.. _ az at •• 1 ^a Mar ._ t - i se : •G IFS. ea a S- — • at 1 alit • t..as as a• +}a mar ee ter. •f -- .. '�'S^•c. t'•t �2 . a . - . • •-• -ia L . fti 3 a .a a . • aa•a.-aw- am at es aM- I as aM a •a • ...a • ass 0 •-•a einnenneirni 1440 111. i l carp ;arse. I)ncutN4ems..Floc rtnicttt ilc:V 'R &Tica d pia i tt1F INIA \i_\ Rpi as tat. to Spa an ft _a _asw r to aq-• «Ia sa iwah f•r•1a. rent 34 FIRM .A' %VIM r Olt IA pi.74 pi .WM}ftitatSiilr p.•T�1O.ai e r __ 3•&ti[ :L= t.' ia • 'safari _S 3 s iL- grata . aaa�aM- - IMs aM aa�a -t tsa••s aal as an Meay Mal M en S. a San as alien ale -M ia& . it latFd•'s flan--• —=aa-+n*M.�r eta rapt • sawn easefa' as li za : iai a-- Tii4. Iq••int r.•a.aS aereas Was al ar w3l,ta- aM� SI SI Se IS SI SS UM it OS .a al tan S .aai 'i in-- '�.I .a.--� Qi'a t' ltiYto - r 4 s on wale a N S. ai. a a a a� s a -fl -iT L• 'S = f.1 a - a- stn at as MS1t a•. .reOr It 't1 aaa a *IVY /- a� a et all !f t nut r 1•r a.. as at alai i-- a•.ttr sat at at • I rya ate .Ma — a as a r a 4� -S ea -* •r•1 • - a a-ta fa>•isae 1 •a•MRwaMa• 1! -!•-t- in Ma. In Mawa• .w» — M▪ an. O.. .. . t 16. _a- or an • a . -men emit we a atat s Sr.' _•4 tS rte• r! Oa a can -s. a4 - i. • - c •a Mara •OS 1+aat aiR• " -•a e. ac . •.a s taa + s a - np•Sr a - eta t s a a P• Pf k�q� i If' ••.•fit.'-p..I I Sitt war 'Me tNfl 3l 4r• lap 5 ea -as -a: . - . s a� a n1-- • aa..a - Ma ab at at &s e M as —Pan ••a: S-5- It li-.Yt-!mar ar - a•a d Spa laa a all so .ta•J••1 noon: eat i•a SI%t&tt -7-tA ae It 1M tea s tar ass art. I no I I -i }nil : , I I : MJ A\11 Fl- MA Flood \lap .RNA t CcuI . r Scorch f3+ Address it II J l L, ' 1 1 im ' MLA N • te/ii ion » 1--7::11 e¶ I ,it ages I 1 1 I ti II' I blips: rrlsc.$.iiiai_gtry ptlicl ll'searcIh .\Lidres Qu6i -- 1.uf D& C' PLANTATION _N Cos' ir tion, tA4searchniNalisanclitor FEMA Flood Map Service Center Search By Address Enler an address, place• air cGard' nates. ti II Ist. i1,', • • s • r- X•1 i I • s•e'ard1 I I I s I I I t iIy Search, Results Products for WELD COUNTY UNINCORPORATED AREAS SJsow ALL Prot1mirfhldpx,e rnss,fema.gorr 4alJ,av.+labilu5tg.lfi.11? add{ eon clonilr080a1 aletomnitro' IwNL3net%NAMCOON r I P DYNAMIC MAP 08123C216SE 01/20112016 0 MAP IMAGE Changes, to usir, I;IRV Q I , — r. I fit I L' _0I•"II 'I —I •1 .,fa I..IsI"II -.b tF III•1• . i I n 3 I -I _I''nnIs. I' '; tl' '9 Ft= rv1 A Flood Map SL^rti ILX (-ureter St";.ircli fl AtkIrL ss :1 Sip relt$11 t�tRi0�^ raKalfirarl l., fig'+a+1�*"L+ mptititiii*.a. . jrnellrjAW-410insst ►trakt, ilhaFertiblaki. ,tsunidshipallailikat M Wr►` - • zs_ 4• t 1 'WHIM i 9•s lr�t '!'wWIR.PF "latatrAtrI Mira furl i.toga 1I Wr?41rF .a.w:%Ow •n• ed •t 'r<! W i+r'is killlM *eat L+MIF r—ap S,* N.ris �eet, nrneil'M*4ft L1M7'khrts MI MIMESIS vi ela•Sraldaltiesliir inn Was wrlwdStaled SM4a,— si.siatt.!Rillet oil LPSJTmints- , gels ras. IS Neal alga ant ratline ass a is - : dr IA MAMA Sic nioniutn ele.F�elre• p — - - 1.f4.4 ►sra►: �— P sFGi6 !ti' i ehA:r-AFI t fat 'Vail Asir r: -lime via * 1rstir*n re r_a17s dies__ terse Ana sWrw I I l! °:"r•`^^. ••!! 1., •+ ! -1'+ __A' i 1 P __ I. ..'1 '' • • ;,, LIC" )Pxir*. Jj1grl-Ejrvivant n..4 arfili'!"r.�j, viS 1t4Leas!' Pix; Li !i1rus l' •sr1' I ' t*=1P(-4• Ftiarty trek],Vs'Arf r4M1tt' ;VI 1r •`'•1 • -. .4 a '14 aTa }4 CirLibi E �r NA 11lig 4"i.y°i, S Atds:g,,. • LEN/ nky .x -f1«�. litnidrint t.r.;,} Oil'; clthe Dettatrotei tvl I40°ba -069 iell.Yitarr cif I • i! Al I1 +C �"1•_I� I.1�'.•+t-Y1g1 I'11w_ tlisr•!t.s.(EC.i»`s1•^,pndes IwlII� ; uL.u.icirs;et&ov plortal st.s491'ch Adkinci1/2, QLiery tot I'. P1. AN IIAI 141N I N a, iil+�I�Ir�. l:ril` �.•��'INrc uJIsafl�'Ik1 5 I -I {JIX. 12:?'i PPM From: To: Subject: Date: David Ankle david@comort.com Ambient Survey (2nd Study) Friday, April 20, 2018 2:08:00 PM Good Afternoon Mr. Suitts, In regards to the sound study, Cureton has been told that the completions job in the area will be completed around 4/24. Cureton will be setting up a second round of ambient survey monitoring equipment starting on 4/27. Please let me know if you have any other questions. Have a great weekend. Best Regards, David Ankle I Landman Cureton Midstream, LLC. 518 17th St. Ste. 650 Denver, Co 80202 C: (303) 888-3715 david.ankle@curetonmidstream.com From: David Ankle To: "mamazzotti@skybeam.com" Cc: Nick Holland (nick.holland a©curetonmidstream.com) Subject: 3-D Modeling Access Date: Thursday, April 12, 2018 7:38:16 AM Attachments: image001.png Good Morning Mr. Mazzotti, I'm following up from a voice message I had left yesterday at 303-536-9274. Please confirm if this phone number is the best method for contacting you? Cureton has contracted a company by the name of Norris Design to help with the 3-D modeling. Below shows a map of those locations where Norris Design has been asked to take photos looking back at the proposed location for the compressor site. With your approval, Norris Design would like to access your property sometime today after 9:30 AM to take a few pictures from Site #2 that is depicted on the map below. Please let me know if you would be agreeable and if there are any special instructions for accessing this location. Best Regards, David Ankle I Land man Cureton Midstream, LLC. 518 17th St. Ste. 650 Denver, CO 80202 C: (303) 888-3715 david.ankle@curetonmidstream.com From: David Ankle To: carson.ribble@gmail.com Cc: Nick Holland (nick.holland@curetonmidstream.com) Subject: 3-D Modeling Access Date: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 4:13:47 PM Attachments: image001.png Good Afternoon Mr. Ribble, Cureton has contracted a company by the name of Norris Design to help with the 3-D modeling. Below shows a map of those locations where Norris Design has been asked to take photos looking back at the proposed location for the compressor site. With your approval, Norris Design would like to access your property sometime after 9:30 AM tomorrow to take a few pictures from Sites 4 & 5 that are depicted on the map below. Please let me know if you would be agreeable and if there are any special instructions for accessing those locations. Best Regards, David Ankle I Land man Cureton Midstream, LLC. 518 17th St. Ste. 650 Denver, CO 80202 C: (303) 888-3715 david.ankle@curetonmidstream.com From: To: Subject: Date: David Ankle "mamazzotti@skvbeam.com" Ambient Study for the proposed Compressor Station Tuesday, April 10, 2018 9:12:59 AM Good Morning Mindy, Thank you for taking the time to speak with me today. As discussed, Cureton Midstream is planning to conduct the ambient study starting this Friday (4/13) —Tuesday (4/17). Monitoring Location #1 will be located just South of the Mazzotti Property, LLC (Parcel: 147519200020), located on the Verdad Resources parcel. As part of Cureton Midstream's community outreach program, Cureton will continue addressing any concerns in regards to the proposed compressor site. Several topics were discussed the other night and Cureton would like to take the opportunity to start addressing those concerns. Cureton is working to provide line of sight photos from each of the Landowner(s) parcels to the proposed site location. This will be instrumental with putting together the 3-D modeling study. I will be contacting you for approval of those photos from your parcel, once scheduling is in place. In addition, Cureton will be starting to conduct the ambient study, as discussed above. Cureton understands that noise is one of the biggest concerns and will be required to provide a study for the Use by Special Review (USR) permit. If possible, I would like to schedule a meeting that would work best with your family. This would allow both your family and Cureton the opportunity to discuss/address any concerns outside the 3-D and ambient studies. Once those studies are complete, Cureton will be providing an update and will be scheduling additional meetings to review. Please let me know a good time that would work for us to come by and discuss. Best Regards, David Ankle I Landman Cureton Midstream, LLC. 518 17th St. Ste. 650 Denver, CO 80202 C: (303) 888-3715 david.ankle@curetonmidstream.com From: To: Subject: Date: David Ankle alan@docjsunlimited.com Ambient Survey (2nd Study) Friday, April 20, 2018 2:10:00 PM Good Afternoon Mr. Davison, In regards to the sound study, Cureton has been told that the completions job in the area will be completed around 4/24. Cureton will be setting up a second round of ambient survey monitoring equipment starting on 4/27. Please let me know if you have any other questions. Have a great weekend. Best Regards, David Ankle I Landman Cureton Midstream, LLC. 518 17th St. Ste. 650 Denver, Co 80202 C: (303) 888-3715 david.ankle@curetonmidstream.com From: To: Subject: Date: David Ankle Mindy & Alan Ambient Survey (2nd Study) Friday, April 20, 2018 2:06:00 PM Good Afternoon Mr. Mazzotti, zzotti, In regards to the sound study, Cureton has been told that the completions job in the area will be completed around 4/24. Cureton will be setting up a second round of ambient survey monitoring equipment starting on 4/27. Please let me know if you have any other questions. Have a great weekend. Best Regards, David Ankle I Landman Cureton Midstream, LLC. 518 17th St. Ste. 650 Denver, Co 80202 C: (303) 888-3715 david.ankle@curetonmidstream.com From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: David Ankle carson.ribble©gmail.comir lee.ribble@gmail.com Nick Holland (nick. hoIland@curetonmidstream.com) Ambient Survey (2nd Study) Friday, April 20, 2018 2:04:00 PM Good Afternoon Leeann and Carson, In regards to the sound study, Cureton has been told that the completions job in the area will be completed around 4/24. Cureton will be setting up a second round of ambient survey monitoring equipment starting on 4/27. Please let me know if you have any other questions. Have a great weekend. Best Regards, David Ankle I Landman Cureton Midstream, LLC. 513 17th St. Ste. 650 Denver, CO 80202 C: (303) 888-3715 david.ankle@curetenmidstrean.com From: Nick Holland To: carson.ribble@omail.com Cc: David Ankle Subject: Cureton Noise Modeling Date: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 3:53:02 PM Attachments: Tiger Compressor Station Sound Monitor Locations.onq Mr. Ribble, First we appreciate the feedback on our communication. As we discussed in the 1st meeting on 4/5/2018 we will be conducting an ambient noise survey. This survey takes data over a four day period. Because of potential issues with weather, the monitors will remain on -site for seven days to ensure quality data. We have elected to go ahead and begin these surveys starting yesterday because of the timeframe associated with putting these models together. These surveys are conducted on a 24 -hour rolling basis to capture the different ambient noise during two weekdays, two weekend days and at night. We will be performing the survey twice to ensure that we have quality data. We will update you on a date for when the second set of sound monitors is anticipated. We are working with two consultants on this project: • Urban Solutions Group: http://urbansolutiongroup.com/services/ • Environmental Noise Control: http://www.environmental-noise-control.com/ Cureton only selects qualified noise engineers to conduct our studies and provide mitigation plans for our projects. Cureton has a robust contractor selection process to ensure we have only the most qualified contractors with a high attention to detail and safety. Our noise engineers have selected four different ambient survey locations for our study and they are attached here. At the 4/5/2018 meeting we let everyone know that we would inform the adjacent property owners about the survey once it was scheduled and that was the reasoning for the email. As we discussed, Cureton was waiting for Weld County to provide the noise development standard to understand what noise regulation the facility is going to be held to. We received communication this week from the Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment that the Tiger Compressor Station will held to the Colorado Revised Statute 25-12-103 for maximum permissible noise levels for a Residential Zone. These levels are 55 dBa during the day and 50 dBa at night. To ensure that you understand the process for our noise survey I want to take a quick minute and re- visit what we described at our meeting. Step 1 —Conduct an Ambient Survey. Step 2 — Conduct a noise model utilizing the equipment that will be located on the proposed site. Step 3 — Develop a mitigation plan to achieve the regulated permissible noise levels (CRS 25-12-103). This process can take 4 to 6 weeks to complete from step 1 to 3. We would welcome scheduling a meeting to review this in more detail with you, and in addition we can bring one of our consultants as well. Thank you for allowing us to have a dialogue with you and we look forward to continuing that dialogue as we proceed. Regards, Nick Holland Nick Holland I Director EHSR O: (720) 390-4506 rick. holly nd@curetonmidstreancom From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: NC Ribble David Ankle Nick Holland Environmental Impact Study Thursday, April 12, 2018 9:01:59 AM Gentlemen, During the informational meeting, we requested a copy of the environmental impact study conducted for this project. You all said you would email it to us. We still are awaiting that information. Carson Ribble, CPA Manager Ribble Land & Cattle Co, LLC 24639 CR 6 Hudson, CO 80642 303-827-4031 cell 970-924-1744 fax ca rson.ribble@gmail.com From: To: Subject: Date: David Ankle "Ku!HOEN E@CM AI L.00M" Follow-up to Cureton"s proposed Compressor Station Wednesday, April 11, 2018 2:55:33 PM Good Afternoon Mr. Thoene, I'm following up to the voice message that I had left earlier in the week at (303) 906-7504. As part of Cureton Midstream's community outreach program, Cureton will continue addressing any concerns in regards to the proposed compressor site. Several topics were discussed in the 1st meeting that took place on 4/5/2018. If possible, I would like to schedule a meeting that would work best with you and your family. This would allow both you and Cureton the opportunity to discuss/address any concerns outside the 3-D and sound studies. Once those studies are complete, Cureton will be providing an update and will be scheduling additional meetings to address a plan based off the results. Please let me know if you would like to meet and discuss any concerns regarding the proposed compressor site. Best Regards, David Ankle I Landman Cureton Midstream, LLC. 518 17th St. Ste. 650 Denver, CO 80202 C: (303) 888-3715 david.anklecuretonmidstream.corn From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: David Ankle "annembm8@ mail.com" Nick Holland (nick. ho Ila n&acureton midstream.com) Follow-up to the proposed Cureton Compressor site Monday, April 9, 2018 4:50:59 PM Good Afternoon Ms. Mitchel, I'm following up to the voice message that I had left earlier today at (303) 536-0101. As part of Cureton Midstream's community outreach program, Cureton will continue addressing any concerns in regards to the proposed compressor site. As you are aware, several topics were discussed the other night and Cureton would like to take the opportunity to start addressing those concerns. Cureton is working to provide line of sight photos from each of the Landowner(s) parcels to the proposed site location. This will be instrumental with putting together the 3-D modeling study. I will be contacting you for approval of those photos from your parcel, once scheduling is in place. In addition, Cureton is also looking for an appropriate time to schedule the sound study. Cureton understands that noise is one of the biggest concerns and will be required to provide a study for the Use by Special Review (USR) permit. If possible, I would like to schedule a meeting that would work best with your family. This would allow both your family and Cureton the opportunity to discuss/address any concerns outside the 3-D and sound studies. Once those studies are complete, Cureton will be providing an update and will be scheduling additional meetings to review. Please let me know a good time that would work for us to come by and discuss. Best Regards, David Ankle I Landman Cureton Midstream, LLC. 518 nth St. Ste. 650 Denver, CO 80202 C: (303) 888-3715 david.ankle@curetonmidstream.com From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: David Ankle "ca rson.ribble@gmail.com" Nick Holland (nick. hoIlan&@curetonmidstream.com) Follow-up to the proposed Cureton Compressor site Monday, April 9, 2018 4:40:23 PM Good Afternoon Carson, Thanks for taking my call earlier today. As part of Cureton Midstream's community outreach program, Cureton will continue addressing any concerns in regards to the proposed compressor site. As you are aware, several topics were discussed the other night and Cureton would like to take the opportunity to start addressing those concerns. Cureton is working to provide line of sight photos from each of the Landowner(s) parcels to the proposed site location. This will be instrumental with putting together the 3-D modeling study. I will be contacting you for approval of those photos from your parcel, once scheduling is in place. In addition, Cureton is also looking for an appropriate time to schedule the sound study. Cureton understands that noise is one of the biggest concerns and will be required to provide a study for the Use by Special Review (USR) permit. If possible, I would like to schedule a meeting that would work best with your family. This would allow both your family and Cureton the opportunity to discuss/address any concerns outside the 3-D and sound studies. Once those studies are complete, Cureton will be providing an update and will be scheduling additional meetings to review. Please let me know a good time that would work for us to come by and discuss. Best Regards, David Ankle I Landman Cureton Midstream, LLC. 518 nth St. Ste. 650 Denver, CO 80202 C: (303) 888-3715 david.ankle@curetonmidstream.com From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: David Ankle "david@comort.com" Nick Holland (nick. hollan&acuretonmidstream.com) Follow-up to the proposed Cureton Compressor site Monday, April 9, 2018 4:47:06 PM Good Afternoon Mr. Suitts, I'm following up to the voice message that I had left earlier today at (303) 536-9510. As part of Cureton Midstream's community outreach program, Cureton will continue addressing any concerns in regards to the proposed compressor site. As you are aware, several topics were discussed the other night and Cureton would like to take the opportunity to start addressing those concerns. Cureton is working to provide line of sight photos from each of the Landowner(s) parcels to the proposed site location. This will be instrumental with putting together the 3-D modeling study. I will be contacting you for approval of those photos from your parcel, once scheduling is in place. In addition, Cureton is also looking for an appropriate time to schedule the sound study. Cureton understands that noise is one of the biggest concerns and will be required to provide a study for the Use by Special Review (USR) permit. If possible, I would like to schedule a meeting that would work best with your family. This would allow both your family and Cureton the opportunity to discuss/address any concerns outside the 3-D and sound studies. Once those studies are complete, Cureton will be providing an update and will be scheduling additional meetings to review. Please let me know a good time that would work for us to come by and discuss. Best Regards, David Ankle I Landman Cureton Midstream, LLC. 518 nth St. Ste. 650 Denver, CO 80202 C: (303) 888-3715 david.ankle@curetonmidstream.com April 11, 2018 Diana Aungst Weld County Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Ave Greeley, CO 80631 Fax: 970-304-5498 Complaint and objection — Case USR18-0022, parcel # 147519300014 Tiger Compression Station Dear Diana, We are filing a formal complaint and objection to the issuance of a special use permit for the proposed Tiger Compression Station, Case # U RIS-O22, located on Verdad Resources, an rn property- Our property is adjacent to this parcel, our entire western property line abuts the Verdad Resources, LLC property, roughly 2700 ft of frontage_ Complaint #1. Lack of meaningful information. To date we have attended a community meeting hosted by Cureton Mid -Stream, LLC, and have requested information via email. A. copy of the information disclosed is attached. The meeting was well attended by the neighborhood. The only hard facts we received at this meeting is that Cureton Mid -Stream, LLC wants to fast track this project Request for the Environmental Impact Study, Flood Plain Critical Facilities- Unfulfilled: During the meeting, we asked for a copy of the environmental impact study relating to the project, and the impact on the tributaries of both Box Elder Creek, and Horse Creek. (There is running water within 50' to 100' of the property line). We have not received this information from Cureton Mid -Stream. We are allso requesting review under Article XI — Floodpflain Management Ordinance, Critical Facilities -Hazardous Materials. Sound Study and abatement_ Unfulfilled: During the meeting, and with follow up mails we have requested additional information. My email requested that they provide sufficient information and all of the details. Specifically relating to the ambient study, (Which they want to do this weekend), we requested general information on who is doing the study, qualifications and certifications of personnel, the specifications, regulatory requirements, operating procedures We also requested a complete map of all of the proposed monitoring locations for the study, Currently we arso have a drilling completion project going on and have high decibel readings of up to 71 on my meter, our normal is under 40. CARSON RiDDLE24639 WCR 6 HUDSON, CO £30642 Cureton Mid —Stream has not suppled sufficient relevant information for our review. What has been supplied is vague. We have requested submission of both timely and relevant information for our review. We are requesting from Weld County Planning Services time to review this information once it is supplied for relevance and completeness to complying with ARTICLE IX — Noise. Sec. 14-9-10. - Intent and applicability. A. it is hereby declared to be the intent of the Board of County Commissioners to protect the citizens of the County from excessive, unreasonable and unnecessary noise. B. This provision of the Code shall apply within the unincorporated territory of the County. We are requesting from Weld County Planning Services time to review this information once it is supplied for relevance and completeness. Complaint 2. We are an Unique Agricultural Tourism area. The 1-76 corridor project is a collaboration concerning this area's development, growth is going to be explosive in our neighborhood over the next couple of decades. Our area attracts people from around the wanid, to come and see the Wi d Animal Sanctuary and our other ag tourism business. We have greenhouse operations, pumpkin patches, and corn maize attractions. This area also has vibrant truck farming operations that supplies fresh vegetables to many urban areas along the Front Range of Colorado. Our Ag Tourism economy will be negatively affected by this heavy industrial zoning,. An alternative for a compressor station is located approximately two miles to the north of the proposed site into areas already designated for industrial zoning. Move it next to the existing power plant There are no positive outcomes in allowing this compressor station to be permitted at its proposed location. We are already seeing urban encroachment at the county line, and increased abuse of "Ag Zoning" for contractor yards, and heavy industrial uses. Allowing this project to be permitted will cause this area to be developed industrial, We can visualize that the next logical step would be for the owner of the property Verdad Resources, LLC to apply for a special use permit for an industrial contractor, and/ or oil field rig yards on the same property. An example of this abuse is the contractor yard and shop built last year on WCR 2 between VVCR 45 and WCR 47. The county has to take a, hard look at this issue. An expansion of the Chapter 26 - Regional Urbanization Areas planning area concept might be a good starting point. We do not believe that this application meets the intent of the Sec. 22-1420. - Comprehensive Plan guiding principles. CARSON RIBBLE- 24639 WCR 6 HUDSON. CO 806 42 Complaint #3: inconsistency's within the Permit: The special review application that was submitted on 03/29/2018 was submitted by Cureton Front Range, LLC, a Delaware company with a Colorado Statement of Foreign entity authority filing date of 07/18/2017. The corresponding "Use by speda.l review questionnaire" CE -1W1 was prepared for Cureton Midstream, LLC, M w with a Delaware company with the same Statement of Foreign entity authority filing date of 07/18/2017. All of our contact has been with Cureton Midstream, LLC. At question is what entity is applying for the application? There has been no representation from nor have we had any contact with an entity called "Cureton Front Range, LLC". We believe the confusion of entities presented within the application is just cause for rejection of the application. Because who are we really dealing with? Objections: Within the CE -101 document we have several concerns that we are objecting to. This is a request for an industrial variance vailed as a drilling pad location variance, which is inconsistent with Section 22-2., and as such they don't qualify for a subdivision exemption, have no Agricultural premise, and as such are not eligible for a special use permit_ This is a heavy industrial project that needs to be located where there is proper zoning. 2. The answers in" Use by special review questionnaire" are inaccurate. Surrounding land use is Agriculture with rural homes. The properties that adjoin ours have one abandoned well location that is located in the flood plain. There aren't any industrial or commercial properties in our immediate area.. 1 Question 5 - Hours of operation: 24/7/365 — Lots of Noise! My decibel reading this morning was 44.4 on my meter. A drilling site Y2 mile away gave us a reading of up to 71 while hacking, and last night the engines were running past midnight last night with a reafnR of 55. The decibels and frequency of the tracking operation this past Saturday into early Sunday Morning has alreadycaused my tinnitus to become highly elevated. Question 10. They stated that the location was under acres at the neighbor meeting, this is inconsistent with what they have verbally discussed. Sr Hudson Fire District. Hudson is a small volunteer fire department.. Additional provisions will be needed. 6r Traffic — They are quoting a location of CR 8 and CR 49. The site is east of CR 49 and north of CR 6 weil south of CR 8. They do not know where they are located. We do not want them accessing the site off of CR 6, as they will be going right thru our neighborhood:. CARSON RiBBLE- 24639 WCR 6 HUDSON, Co 80642 - Drainage Detention Pond — There is a, large tank being built already North of the proposed site. Is this the detention pond? They have been very ambiguous as to project details. 8. Noise levels are currently extremely low in our area, we can hear the lions roar a mile away in the morning. We are very concerned about the noise. They are proposing "arctic type buildings", (cloth structures) in addition to the "landscaping, berms, and screening". LE a TENT. This solution it NOT adequate. If the application is allowed to proceed, this issue must be addressed = the compressors and associated equipment must be housed in an adequately engineered sound proofed building that will contain the noise in a 24 hour per day, 7 days per week 52 weeks per year operation. 9. Under Building Questions 2. There is an existing large pole barn building on the Verdad Resources property. In conclusion: There are serious errors in the application as submitted. We are raising a complaint and an objection to the issuance of a variance or permit for the submitted Special Review (USR) Application submitted by Cureton Front Range, USR18-0022 for both the errors in entity, and all the other reasons discussed in the objection complaint letter. If by chance this application reaches the hearing or review stage before any planning board or commission or the county commissioners; we are requesting a time slot to speak concurrent with the scheduled time and date of any hearing or discussion of this application. Sincerely, Carson Ribble Concerned Weld County Citizen CARSON RIDDLE- 24639 WCR 6 HUDSON, CO 80642 - From: To: Subject: Date: Attachments: NC Ribble David Ankle RE: 3-D Modeling Access- Denied Thursday, April 12, 2018 8:21:54 AM imageOOl.png Thanks you for the additional information. I'm denying your request. As we have previously discussed, I am not available until next week. (It's tax season) I DO NOT WANT ANYONE REPRESENTING YOUR COMPANY(S)ON MY PROPERTY UNTIL I HAVE HAD TIME TO REVIEW. It would be best to postpone this test. We have already filed a complaint with the Colorado Oil & Gas Commission regarding the excess noise being generated by the completion operations. We STRONGLY urge you to slow down. We are not going to accept this study as a representative base line. Sorry From: David Ankle <david.ankle@curetonmidstream.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 4:14 PM To: carson.ribblegmail.com Cc: Nick Holland <nick.holland@curetonmidstream.com> Subject: 3-D Modeling Access Good Afternoon Mr. Ribble, Cureton has contracted a company by the name of Norris Design to help with the 3-D modeling. Below shows a map of those locations where Norris Design has been asked to take photos looking back at the proposed location for the compressor site. With your approval, Norris Design would like to access your property sometime after 9:30 AM tomorrow to take a few pictures from Sites 4 & 5 that are depicted on the map below. Please let me know if you would be agreeable and if there are any special instructions for accessing those locations. Best Regards, David Ankle I Land man Cureton Midstream, LLC. 518 17th St. Ste. 650 Denver, CO 80202 C: (303) 888-3715 david.ankle@curetonmidstream.com From: To: Subject: Date: Attachments: David Ankle "Mindy & Alan" RE: 3-D Modeling Access Monday, April 16, 2018 8:40:25 AM irnage003.png Mr. Mazzotti, First we appreciate the feedback on our communication. As we discussed in the 1st meeting on 4/5/2018 we will be conducting an ambient noise survey. This survey takes data over a four day period. Because of potential issues with weather, the monitors will remain on -site for seven days to ensure quality data. We have elected to go ahead and begin these surveys starting last week because of the timeframe associated with putting these models together. These surveys are conducted on a 24 -hour rolling basis to capture the different ambient noise during two weekdays, two weekend days and at night. We will be performing the survey twice to ensure that we have quality data. We will update you on a date for when the second set of sound monitors is anticipated. We are working with two consultants on this project: • Urban Solutions Group: http://urbansolutiongrou a.comiservices • Environmental Noise Control: http://www.environmental-noise-control.com/ Cureton only selects qualified noise engineers to conduct our studies and provide mitigation plans for our projects. Cureton has a robust contractor selection process to ensure we have only the most qualified contractors with a high attention to detail and safety. Our noise engineers have selected four different ambient survey locations for our study. At the 4/5/2018 meeting we let everyone know that we would inform the adjacent property owners about the survey once it was scheduled and that was the reasoning for the email. As we discussed, Cureton was waiting for Weld County to provide the noise development standard to understand what noise regulation the facility is going to be held to. We received communication last week from the Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment that the Tiger Compressor Station will held to the Colorado Revised Statute 25-12-103 for maximum permissible noise levels for a Residential Zone. These levels are 55 dBa during the day and 50 dBa at night. To ensure that you understand the process for our noise survey I want to take a quick minute and re -visit what we described at our meeting. Step 1— Conduct an Ambient Survey. Step 2 — Conduct a noise model utilizing the equipment that will be located on the proposed site. Step 3 — Develop a mitigation plan to achieve the regulated permissible noise levels (CRS 25-12-103). This process can take 4 to 6 weeks to complete from step 1 to 3. We would welcome scheduling a meeting to review this in more detail with you, and in addition we can bring one of our consultants as well. Thank you for allowing us to have a dialogue with you and we look forward to continuing that dialogue as we proceed. David Ankle Landman C: (303) 888-3715 david.ankle@curetonmidstream.com From: Mindy & Alan [ma ilto:mamazzotti@skybeam.com] Sent: Friday, April 13, 2018 1:46 PM To: David Ankle <david.ankle@curetonmidstream.com> Subject: Re: 3-D Modeling Access David At this time i don't you you to come on my property. I need time to look into what a compression station will do to the area. Please slow down and have meetings that tell us all the information needed to make a decision. The phone # is a goodplace to reach me or email. I don't have time to look at my email every day so give me time. Alan mazzotti cell # 3037102408 On 4/12/2018 7:38 AM, David Ankle wrote: Good Morning Mr. Mazzotti, I'm following up from a voice message I had left yesterday at 303-536-9274. Please confirm if this phone number is the best method for contacting you? Cureton has contracted a company by the name of Norris Design to help with the 3-D modeling, Below shows a map of those locations where Norris Design has been asked to take photos looking back at the proposed location for the compressor site. With your approval, Norris Design would Ike to access your property sometime today after 9:30 AM to take a few pictures from Site #2 that is depicted on the map pelow. Please let me know if you would be agreeable and if there are any special instructions for accessing this location. Best Regards, David Ankle I Landman Cureton Midstream, LLC. 518 17th St. Ste. 650 Denver, CO 80202 C: (303) 888-3715 david.ankle@curetonmidstream.com From: To: Subject: Date: Attachments: Mindy & Alan David Ankle Re: 3-D Modeling Access Friday, April 13, 2018 1:46:10 PM i rriage001.pnq David At this time i don't you you to come on my property. I need time to look into what a compression station will do to the area. Please slow down and have meetings that tell us all the information needed to make a decision. The phone # is a good place to reach me or email. I don't have time to look at my email every day so give me time. Alan mazzotti cell # 3037102408 On 4/12/2018 7:38 AM, David Ankle wrote: Good Morning Mr. Mazzotti, I'm following up from a voice message I had left yesterday at 363-536-9274. Please confirm if this phone number is the best method for contacting you? Cureton has contracted a company by the name of Norris Design to help with the 3-D modeling. Below shows a map of those locations where Norris Design has been asked to take photos looking back at the proposed location for the compressor site. With your approval, Norris Design would like to access your property sometime today after 9:30 AM to take a few pictures from Site #2 that is depicted on the map below. Please let me know if you would be agreeable and if there are any special instructions for accessing this location. Best Regards, David Ankle I Landman Cureton n Midstream, LLC. 518 17th St. Ste. 650 Denver, CO 80202 C: (303) 888-3715 david.ankle@curetonmidstream.com  From: NC Ribble To: David Ankle Subject: RE: Ambient Study for the proposed Compressor Station Date: Tuesday, April 10, 2018 10:33:26 AM Attachments: image002.pnq David You are not providing sufficient information, we want all the details. We want to see the criteria that you are planning on using for this ambient study, including who is doing the study, their qualifications and certifications. Specifications, and regulatory requirements and procedures are also requested. The list of monitoring locations you have submitted to us is also incomplete, we what to see all the proposed monitoring locations for this study. Again, you have not supplied sufficient information for our review. Because you are not suppling relevant information, I would recommend that you postpone your study until you can supply the requested information, and give us sufficient time to review your plan, and assess it for completeness. Regards, Carson Ribble, CPA Manager Ribble Land & Cattle Co, LLC 24639 CR 6 Hudson, Co 80642 303-827-4031 cell 970-924-1744 fax carson.ribble@grnail.com From: David Ankle <david.ankle@curetonmidstream.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2018 9:44 AM To: carson.ribblegmail.com Subject: Ambient Study for the proposed Compressor Station Good Morning Leeann and Carson, Cureton Midstream is planning to conduct the ambient study this Friday (4/13) —Tuesday (4/17). Monitoring Locations 3 and 4 will be located within the Verdad Resources parcel, as shown below. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Monitoring Location #3 Moisito4 big Location IA Best Regards, David Ankle I Landman Cureton Midstream, LLC. 518 17th St. Ste. 650 Denver, CO 80202 C: (303) 888-3715 david.ankle@curetonmidstream.com From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Nick Holland NC Ribble David Ankle RE: Cureton Noise Modeling Tuesday, April 17, 2018 7:04:08 AM Mr. Ribble, As we discussed at the meeting and described in our follow up email the sound study will take around 4 to 6 weeks to complete. Once it is completed we look forward to sharing the data and mitigation plan with the surrounding property owners. As an FYI we have been told that the completions job in the area will be completed around 4/24. Due to this we will set up our second round of ambient survey monitoring equipment starting on 4/27. David will be reaching out to everyone towards the end of this week to let them know. Please let me know if you have any other questions. Regards, Nick Holland From: NC Ribble <carson.ribblegmail.com> Sent: Monday, April 16, 2O18 11:OO AM To: Nick Holland <nick.holland@curetonmidstream.com> Cc: David Ankle <david.a n kle @cureton midstrea m.co m> Subject: RE: Cureton Noise Modeling Nick, We were just checking to see the status of the noise modeling study. Thanks Carson Ribble, CPA Manager Ribble Land & Cattle Co, LLC 24639 CR 6 Hudson, Co 80642 303-827-4O31 cell 970-924-1744 fax carson.ribble@gmail.com From: Nick Holland <nick.holland Ccuretonmidstream.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2O18 3:53 PM To: carson.ribble@gmai.com Cc: David Ankle <david.an kle @cureton midstrea m.com> Subject: Cureton Noise Modeling Mr. Ribble, First we appreciate the feedback on our communication. As we discussed in the 1st meeting on 4/5/2018 we will be conducting an ambient noise survey. This survey takes data over a four day period. Because of potential issues with weather, the monitors will remain on -site for seven days to ensure quality data. We have elected to go ahead and begin these surveys starting yesterday because of the timeframe associated with putting these models together. These surveys are conducted on a 24 -hour rolling basis to capture the different ambient noise during two weekdays, two weekend days and at night. We will be performing the survey twice to ensure that we have quality data. We will update you on a date for when the second set of sound monitors is anticipated. We are working with two consultants on this project: • Urban Solutions Group: http://urbansolutiongroup.com/services/ • Environmental Noise Control: http://www.environmental-noise-control.com/ Cureton only selects qualified noise engineers to conduct our studies and provide mitigation plans for our projects. Cureton has a robust contractor selection process to ensure we have only the most qualified contractors with a high attention to detail and safety. Our noise engineers have selected four different ambient survey locations for our study and they are attached here. At the 4/5/2018 meeting we let everyone know that we would inform the adjacent property owners about the survey once it was scheduled and that was the reasoning for the email. As we discussed, Cureton was waiting for Weld County to provide the noise development standard to understand what noise regulation the facility is going to be held to. We received communication this week from the Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment that the Tiger Compressor Station will held to the Colorado Revised Statute 25-12-103 for maximum permissible noise levels for a Residential Zone. These levels are 55 dBa during the day and 50 dBa at night. To ensure that you understand the process for our noise survey I want to take a quick minute and re- visit what we described at our meeting. Step 1— Conduct an Ambient Survey. Step 2 —Conduct a noise model utilizing the equipment that will be located on the proposed site. Step 3 — Develop a mitigation plan to achieve the regulated permissible noise levels (CRS 25-12-103). This process can take 4 to 6 weeks to complete from step 1 to 3. We would welcome scheduling a meeting to review this in more detail with you, and in addition we can bring one of our consultants as well. Thank you for allowing us to have a dialogue with you and we look forward to continuing that dialogue as we proceed. Regards, Nick Holland Nick Holland I Director EHSR 0: (720) 390-4506 nick.holland@curetonmidstream.com From: NC Ribble To: Nick Holland Cc: David Ankle Subject: RE: Cureton Noise Modeling Date: Monday, April 16, 2018 11:00:28 AM Nick, We were just checking to see the status of the noise modeling study. Thanks Carson Ribble, CPA Manager Ribble Land & Cattle Co, LLC 24639 CR 6 Hudson, Co 80642 303-827-4031 cell 970-924-1744 fax carson.ribble@gmail.com From: Nick Holland cnick.ho lla nd@cu retonm idstream.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 3:53 PM To: carson.ribblegmail.com Cc: David Ankle cdavid.ankle@curetonmidstream.com> Subject: Cureton Noise Modeling Mr. Ribble, First we appreciate the feedback on our communication. As we discussed in the 1st meeting on 4/5/2018 we will be conducting an ambient noise survey. This survey takes data over a four day period. Because of potential issues with weather, the monitors will remain on -site for seven days to ensure quality data. We have elected to go ahead and begin these surveys starting yesterday because of the timeframe associated with putting these models together. These surveys are conducted on a 24 -hour rolling basis to capture the different ambient noise during two weekdays, two weekend days and at night. We will be performing the survey twice to ensure that we have quality data. We will update you on a date for when the second set of sound monitors is anticipated. We are working with two consultants on this project: • Urban Solutions Group: http://urbansolutiongroup.com/services/ • Environmental Noise Control: http://www.environmental-noise-control.com/ Cureton only selects qualified noise engineers to conduct our studies and provide mitigation plans for our projects. Cureton has a robust contractor selection process to ensure we have only the most qualified contractors with a high attention to detail and safety. Our noise engineers have selected four different ambient survey locations for our study and they are attached here. At the 4/5/2018 meeting we let everyone know that we would inform the adjacent property owners about the survey once it was scheduled and that was the reasoning for the email. As we discussed, Cureton was waiting for Weld County to provide the noise development standard to understand what noise regulation the facility is going to be held to. We received communication this week from the Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment that the Tiger Compressor Station will held to the Colorado Revised Statute 25-12-103 for maximum permissible noise levels for a Residential Zone. These levels are 55 dBa during the day and 50 dBa at night. To ensure that you understand the process for our noise survey I want to take a quick minute and re- visit what we described at our meeting. Step 1 — Conduct an Ambient Survey. Step 2 — Conduct a noise model utilizing the equipment that will be located on the proposed site. Step 3 — Develop a mitigation plan to achieve the regulated permissible noise levels (CRS 25-12-103). This process can take 4 to 6 weeks to complete from step 1 to 3. We would welcome scheduling a meeting to review this in more detail with you, and in addition we can bring one of our consultants as well. Thank you for allowing us to have a dialogue with you and we look forward to continuing that dialogue as we proceed. Regards, Nick Holland Nick Holland I Director EHSR 0: (720) 390-4506 nick.holland@curetonmidstream.com From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: NC Ribble Nick Holland David Ankle RE: Cureton Noise Modeling Tuesday, April 17, 2018 7:20:21 AM Thank you for the reply. Carson Ribble, CPA Manager Ribble Land & Cattle Co, LLC 24639 CR 6 Hudson, CO 80642 303-827-4031 cell 970-924-1744 fax carson.ribble@gmail.com From: Nick Holland <nick.holland@curetonmidstream.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2018 7:04 AM To: NC Ribble <carson.ribble @gmail.com> Cc: David Ankle <david.a n kle @cureton midstrea m.co m> Subject: RE: Cureton Noise Modeling Mr. Ribble, As we discussed at the meeting and described in our follow up email the sound study will take around 4 to 6 weeks to complete. Once it is completed we look forward to sharing the data and mitigation plan with the surrounding property owners. As an FYI we have been told that the completions job in the area will be completed around 4/24. Due to this we will set up our second round of ambient survey monitoring equipment starting on 4/27. David will be reaching out to everyone towards the end of this week to let them know. Please let me know if you have any other questions. Regards, Nick Holland From: NC Ribble <carson.ribblegmail.com> Sent: Monday, April 16, 2018 11:00 AM To: Nick Holland <nick.hollandcuretonmidstream.com> Cc: David Ankle <david.ankle@curetonmidstream.com> @cureton midstrea m.com> Subject: RE: Cureton Noise Modeling Nick, We were just checking to see the status of the noise modeling study. Thanks Carson Ribble, CPA Manager Ribble Land & Cattle Co, LLC 24639 CR 6 Hudson, CO 80642 303-827-4031 cell 970-924-1744 fax carson.ribole@gmaiI.com From: Nick Holland <nick.ho lla nd@cu retonm idstream.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 3:53 PM To: carson.ribble@gmail.com Cc: David Ankle cdavid.an kle @cureton midstrea m.com> Subject: Cureton Noise Modeling Mr. Ribble, First we appreciate the feedback on our communication. As we discussed in the 1st meeting on 4/5/2018 we will be conducting an ambient noise survey. This survey takes data over a four day period. Because of potential issues with weather, the monitors will remain on -site for seven days to ensure quality data. We have elected to go ahead and begin these surveys starting yesterday because of the timeframe associated with putting these models together. These surveys are conducted on a 24 -hour rolling basis to capture the different ambient noise during two weekdays, two weekend days and at night. We will be performing the survey twice to ensure that we have quality data. We will update you on a date for when the second set of sound monitors is anticipated. We are working with two consultants on this project: • Urban Solutions Group: http://urbansolutiongroup.com/services/ • Environmental Noise Control: http://www.environmental-noise-control.com/ Cureton only selects qualified noise engineers to conduct our studies and provide mitigation plans for our projects. Cureton has a robust contractor selection process to ensure we have only the most qualified contractors with a high attention to detail and safety. Our noise engineers have selected four different ambient survey locations for our study and they are attached here. At the 4/5/2018 meeting we let everyone know that we would inform the adjacent property owners about the survey once it was scheduled and that was the reasoning for the email. As we discussed, Cureton was waiting for Weld County to provide the noise development standard to understand what noise regulation the facility is going to be held to. We received communication this week from the Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment that the Tiger Compressor Station will held to the Colorado Revised Statute 25-12-103 for maximum permissible noise levels for a Residential Zone. These levels are 55 dBa during the day and 50 dBa at night. To ensure that you understand the process for our noise survey I want to take a quick minute and re- visit what we described at our meeting. Step 1 — Conduct an Ambient Survey. Step 2 —Conduct a noise model utilizing the equipment that will be located on the proposed site. Step 3 — Develop a mitigation plan to achieve the regulated permissible noise levels (CRS 25-12-103). This process can take 4 to 6 weeks to complete from step 1 to 3. We would welcome scheduling a meeting to review this in more detail with you, and in addition we can bring one of our consultants as well. Thank you for allowing us to have a dialogue with you and we look forward to continuing that dialogue as we proceed. Regards, Nick Holland Nick Holland I Director EHSR 0: (720) 390-4506 nick.holland@curetonmidstream.com From: To: Subject: Date: Nick Holland NC Ribble; David Ankle RE: Environmental Impact Study Thursday, April 12, 2018 1:19:45 PM Mr.Ribble— The work being performed on the property is for our gathering system. Due to the 8" line coming from the west and the 6" lines from the east, we need to get everything connected. The line size change happens to be on that site, and all work currently being performed is to complete that tie. All work currently being performed is in accordance with our signed ROW agreements on the site. We would be happy to meet in person to discuss any further issues. From: NC Ribble <carson.ribble@gmail.com> l.com> Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2018 9:49 AM To: Nick Holland snick.hollandcuretonmidstream.com>; David Ankle <david.an kle @cureton midstrea rn.co m> Subject: RE: Environmental Impact Study Mr. Holland; I have bcc'd my neighborhood contacts on this email. Neighborhood, please respond if you want Nick to have your email. In addition I noticed yesterday, and today that the manifolds and chokes for the 4 compressors are being put in place, this is work directly associated construction of the compressor station. We would ask that you to cease and desist all work on the compressor station until you have a permit. Regards Carson Ribble, CPA Manager Ribble Land & Cattle Co, LLC 24639 CR 6 Hudson, Co 80642 303-827-4031 cell 970-924-1744 fax ca rso n. ri b ble gmai I.com From: Nick Holland cnick.holland @curetonmidstream.com> Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2018 9:28 AM To: NC Ribble <carson.ribble@gmail.com>; David Ankle <david.ankle@curetonmidstream.com> Subject: RE: Environmental Impact Study Mr. Ribble, Our environmental consultant is finalizing the report over the next couple of weeks and once it is completed we will make that information available. For your information all of the studies and submittals that will be associated with our USR will be available within our USR record on the Weld County website. If you have not been to the site to look at USR cases I have provided the link below. https://www.weldgov.comjdepartments/planning_and_zoning I also wanted to follow up on something. We asked for a copy of the email list that was being passed around at the 1st meeting on 4/5/2018 to help us better communicate with all the surrounding property owners. We believe we have most of the emails but would appreciate the ability to compare that with that list. If you could send that over at your convenience we would appreciate it. Thanks From: NC Ribble <ca rson.ribble@gmai l.com> Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2018 9:02 AM To: David Ankle <david.ankle@curetonmidstream.com> Cc: Nick Holland <nick.ho lla nd cu retonm idstream.com> Subject: Environmental Impact Study Gentlemen, During the informational meeting, we requested a copy of the environmental impact study conducted for this project. You all said you would email it to us. We still are awaiting that information. Carson Ribble, CPA Manager Ribble Land & Cattle Co, LLC 24639 CR 6 Hudson, CO 80642 303-827-4031 cell 970-924-1744 fax ca rson.ri bble @gmail.com From: To: Subject: Date: NC Ribble Nick Holland; David Ankle RE: Environmental Impact Study Thursday, April 12, 2018 9:48:46 AM Mr. Holland; I have bcc'd my neighborhood contacts on this email. Neighborhood, please respond if you want Nick to have your email. In addition I noticed yesterday, and today that the manifolds and chokes for the 4 compressors are being put in place, this is work directly associated construction of the compressor station. We would ask that you to cease and desist all work on the compressor station until you have a permit. Regards Carson Ribble, CPA Manager Ribble Land & Cattle Co, LLC 24639 CR 6 Hudson, CO 80642 303-827-4031 cell 970-924-1744 fax carson.ribblegmail.com From: Nick Holland <nick.holland@curetonmidstream.com> Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2018 9:28 AM To: NC Ribble <carson.ribble @gmail.com>; David Ankle<david.ankle@curetonmidstream.com> Subject: RE: Environmental Impact Study Mr. Ribble, Our environmental consultant is finalizing the report over the next couple of weeks and once it is completed we will make that information available. For your information all of the studies and submittals that will be associated with our USR will be available within our USR record on the Weld County website. If you have not been to the site to look at USR cases I have provided the link below. https://www.weldgovicomidepartmentsiplanning and_zon i ng I also wanted to follow up on something. We asked for a copy of the email list that was being passed around at the 1st meeting on 4/5/2018 to help us better communicate with all the surrounding property owners. We believe we have most of the emails but would appreciate the ability to compare that with that list. If you could send that over at your convenience we would appreciate it. Thanks From: NC Ribble ccarson.ribbleiEPgmaiI.com> Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2018 9:02 AM To: David Ankle<david.ankle@curetonmidstream.com> Cc: Nick Holland <nick.holland@curetonmidstream.com> Subject: Environmental Impact Study Gentlemen, During the informational meeting, we requested a copy of the environmental impact study conducted for this project. You all said you would email it to us. We still are awaiting that information. Carson Ribble, CPA Manager Ribble Land & Cattle Co, LLC 24639 CR 6 Hudson, CO 80642 303-827-4031 cell 970-924-1744 fax carson.ribble@gmail.com From: David Ankle To: "David Suitts" Cc: Nick Holland (nick.hoIlandC@curetonmidstream.com) Subject: RE: Follow-up to the proposed Cureton Compressor site Date: Thursday, April 12, 2018 9:40:10 AM Attachments: Tiger Compressor Station Sound Monitor Locations.pna Mr. Suitts, First we appreciate the feedback on our communication. As we discussed in the 1st meeting on 4/5/2018 we will be conducting an ambient noise survey. This survey takes data over a four day period. Because of potential issues with weather, the monitors will remain on -site for seven days to ensure quality data. We have elected to go ahead and begin these surveys starting this week because of the timeframe associated with putting these models together. These surveys are conducted on a 24 -hour rolling basis to capture the different ambient noise during two weekdays, two weekend days and at night. We will be performing the survey twice to ensure that we have quality data. We will update you on a date for when the second set of sound monitors is anticipated. We are working with two consultants on this project: • Urban Solutions Group: http://urbansolutiongroup.com/services/ • Environmental Noise Control: http://www.environmental-noise-control.com/ Cureton only selects qualified noise engineers to conduct our studies and provide mitigation plans for our projects. Cureton has a robust contractor selection process to ensure we have only the most qualified contractors with a high attention to detail and safety. Our noise engineers have selected four different ambient survey locations for our study and they are attached here. At the 4/5/2018 meeting we let everyone know that we would inform the adjacent property owners about the survey once it was scheduled and that was the reasoning for the email. As we discussed, Cureton was waiting for Weld County to provide the noise development standard to understand what noise regulation the facility is going to be held to. We received communication this week from the Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment that the Tiger Compressor Station will held to the Colorado Revised Statute 25-12-103 for maximum permissible noise levels for a Residential Zone. These levels are 55 dBa during the day and 50 dBa at night. To ensure that you understand the process for our noise survey I want to take a quick minute and re- visit what we described at our meeting. Step 1 — Conduct an Ambient Survey. Step 2 — Conduct a noise model utilizing the equipment that will be located on the proposed site. Step 3 — Develop a mitigation plan to achieve the regulated permissible noise levels (CRS 25-12-103). This process can take 4 to 6 weeks to complete from step 1 to 3. We would welcome scheduling a meeting to review this in more detail with you, and in addition we can bring one of our consultants as well. Thank you for allowing us to have a dialogue with you and we look forward to continuing that dialogue as we proceed. David Ankle I Landman C: (303) 888-3715 david.ankle@curetonmidstream.com From: David Suitts [mailto:david@comort.com] m] Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 11:36 AM To: David Ankle <david.ankle@curetonmidstream.com> Subject: RE: Follow-up to the proposed Cureton Compressor site David as we discussed yesterday I think it would behoove Cureton to put their best foot forwarded and not try to rush this project as to a perceived time schedule —it will only make the process longer in the end -currently your sound study should be in the form of a proposal to the neighborhood -with reasonable time to assess/review-otherwise you may just be doing it again -David Suitts From: David Ankle [mailto:david.anklecuretonmidstream.com] Sent: Monday, April 09, 2018 4:47 PM To: David Suitts <david comort.com> Cc: Nick Holland <nick.ho lla nd cu retonm idstream.com> Subject: Follow-up to the proposed Cureton Compressor site Good Afternoon Mr. Suitts, I'm following up to the voice message that I had left earlier today at (303) 536-9510. As part of Cureton Midstream's community outreach program, Cureton will continue addressing any concerns in regards to the proposed compressor site. As you are aware, several topics were discussed the other night and Cureton would like to take the opportunity to start addressing those concerns. Cureton is working to provide line of sight photos from each of the Landowner(s) parcels to the proposed site location. This will be instrumental with putting together the 3-D modeling study. I will be contacting you for approval of those photos from your parcel, once scheduling is in place. In addition, Cureton is also looking for an appropriate time to schedule the sound study. Cureton understands that noise is one of the biggest concerns and will be required to provide a study for the Use by Special Review (USR) permit. If possible, I would like to schedule a meeting that would work best with your family. This would allow both your family and Cureton the opportunity to discuss/address any concerns outside the 3-D and sound studies. Once those studies are complete, Cureton will be providing an update and will be scheduling additional meetings to review. Please let me know a good time that would work for us to come by and discuss. Best Regards, David Ankle I Landman Cureton Midstream, LLC. 518 17th St. Ste. 650 Denver, CO 80202 C: (303) 888-3715 david.ankle@curetonmidstream.com This email has been scanned for sparn and viruses by Proofpoint Essentials. Click here to report this email as spar. From: To: Subject: Date: David Suitts David Ankle RE: Follow-up to the proposed Cureton Compressor site Wednesday, April 11, 2018 11:35:54 AM David —as we discussed yesterday I think it would behoove Cureton to put their best foot forwarded and not try to rush this project as to a perceived time schedule —it will only make the process longer in the end -currently your sound study should be in the form of a proposal to the neighborhood -with reasonable time to assess/review-otherwise you may just be doing it again -David Suitts From: David Ankle [mailto:david.ankle@curetonmidstream.com] Sent: Monday, April 09, 2018 4:47 PM To: David Suitts <david@comort.com> Cc: Nick Holland <nick.ho lla nd@cu retonm idstream.com> Subject: Follow-up to the proposed Cureton Compressor site Good Afternoon Mr. Suitts, I'm following up to the voice message that I had left earlier today at (303) 536-9510. As part of Cureton Midstream's community outreach program, Cureton will continue addressing any concerns in regards to the proposed compressor site. As you are aware, several topics were discussed the other night and Cureton would like to take the opportunity to start addressing those concerns. Cureton is working to provide line of sight photos from each of the Landowner(s) parcels to the proposed site location. This will be instrumental with putting together the 3-D modeling study. I will be contacting you for approval of those photos from your parcel, once scheduling is in place. In addition, Cureton is also looking for an appropriate time to schedule the sound study. Cureton understands that noise is one of the biggest concerns and will be required to provide a study for the Use by Special Review (USR) permit. If possible, I would like to schedule a meeting that would work best with your family. This would allow both your family and Cureton the opportunity to discuss/address any concerns outside the 3-D and sound studies. Once those studies are complete, Cureton will be providing an update and will be scheduling additional meetings to review. Please let me know a good time that would work for us to come by and discuss. Best Regards, David Ankle I Landman Cureton Midstream, LLC. 518 17th St. Ste. 650 Denver, Co 80202 C: (303) 888-3715 david.ankle@curetonmidstream.com This email has been scanned for spam and viruses by Proofpoint Essentials. Click here to report this email as spam. From: To: Subject: Date: David Suitts David Ankle RE: Follow-up to the proposed Cureton compressor site Thursday, April 12, 2018 11:05:26 AM David —thanks -FYI there is excessive construction noise -pond and pipeline plus Fracking/completion well work adjacent to or in the immediate area of your proposed site and monitoring locations -this is out of the ordinary and not normal and therefore will not represent valid median noise levels for your ambient study —again as the old saying goes -haste makes waste -David Suitts From: David Ankle [mailto:david.ankle@curetonmidstream.com] Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2018 9:40 AM To: David Suitts <david@comort.com> Cc: Nick Holland <nick.ho lla nd@cu retonm idstream.com> Subject: RE: Follow-up to the proposed Cureton Compressor site Mr. Suitts, First we appreciate the feedback on our communication. As we discussed in the 1st meeting on 4/5/2018 we will be conducting an ambient noise survey. This survey takes data over a four day period. Because of potential issues with weather, the monitors will remain on -site for seven days to ensure quality data. We have elected to go ahead and begin these surveys starting this week because of the timeframe associated with putting these models together. These surveys are conducted on a 24 -hour rolling basis to capture the different ambient noise during two weekdays, two weekend days and at night. We will be performing the survey twice to ensure that we have quality data. We will update you on a date for when the second set of sound monitors is anticipated. We are working with two consultants on this project: • Urban Solutions Group: http://urbansolutiongroup.com/services/ • Environmental Noise Control: http://www.environmental-noise-control.com/ Cureton only selects qualified noise engineers to conduct our studies and provide mitigation plans for our projects. Cureton has a robust contractor selection process to ensure we have only the most qualified contractors with a high attention to detail and safety. Our noise engineers have selected four different ambient survey locations for our study and they are attached here. At the 4/5/2018 meeting we let everyone know that we would inform the adjacent property owners about the survey once it was scheduled and that was the reasoning for the email. As we discussed, Cureton was waiting for Weld County to provide the noise development standard to understand what noise regulation the facility is going to be held to. We received communication this week from the Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment that the Tiger Compressor Station will held to the Colorado Revised Statute 25-12-103 for maximum permissible noise levels for a Residential Zone. These levels are 55 dBa during the day and 50 dBa at night. To ensure that you understand the process for our noise survey I want to take a quick minute and re- visit what we described at our meeting. Step 1 —Conduct an Ambient Survey. Step 2 — Conduct a noise model utilizing the equipment that will be located on the proposed site. Step 3 — Develop a mitigation plan to achieve the regulated permissible noise levels (CRS 25-12-103). This process can take 4 to 6 weeks to complete from step 1 to 3. We would welcome scheduling a meeting to review this in more detail with you, and in addition we can bring one of our consultants as well. Thank you for allowing us to have a dialogue with you and we look forward to continuing that dialogue as we proceed. David Ankle I Landman C: (303) 888-3715 david.ankle@curetonmidstream.com From: David Suitts [mailto:david @comort.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 11:36 AM To: David Ankle cdavid.ankle bcuretonmidstream.com> Subject: RE: Follow-up to the proposed Cureton Compressor site David as we discussed yesterday I think it would behoove Cureton to put their best foot forwarded and not try to rush this project as to a perceived time schedule —it will only make the process longer in the end -currently your sound study should be in the form of a proposal to the neighborhood -with reasonable time to assess/review-otherwise you may just be doing it again -David Suitts From: David Ankle[mailto:david.anklecuretonmidstream.com] Sent: Monday, April 09, 2018 4:47 PM To: David Suits <david comort.com> Cc: Nick Holland nick.ho lla nd@cu retonm idstream.com> Subject: Follow-up to the proposed Cureton Compressor site Good Afternoon Mr. Suitts, I'm following up to the voice message that I had left earlier today at (303) 536-9510. As part of Cureton Midstream's community outreach program, Cureton will continue addressing any concerns in regards to the proposed compressor site. As you are aware, several topics were discussed the other night and Cureton would like to take the opportunity to start addressing those concerns. Cureton is working to provide line of sight photos from each of the Landowner(s) parcels to the proposed site location. This will be instrumental with putting together the 3-D modeling study. I will be contacting you for approval of those photos from your parcel, once scheduling is in place. In addition, Cureton is also looking for an appropriate time to schedule the sound study. Cureton understands that noise is one of the biggest concerns and will be required to provide a study for the Use by Special Review (USR) permit. If possible, I would like to schedule a meeting that would work best with your family. This would allow both your family and Cureton the opportunity to discuss/address any concerns outside the 3-D and sound studies. Once those studies are complete, Cureton will be providing an update and will be scheduling additional meetings to review. Please let me know a good time that would work for us to come by and discuss. Best Regards, David Ankle I Landman Cureton Midstream, LLC. 518 17th St. Ste. 650 Denver, CO 80202 C: (303) 888-3715 david.ankle@curetonmidstream.com This email has been scanned for spam and viruses by Proofpoint Essentials. Click here to report this email as spam. From: David Ankle To: Anne Mitchell Subject: RE: FREE admission to the 2018 Food Revolution Summit Date: Friday, April 20, 2018 1:54:59 PM Good Afternoon Anne, Thanks for this information. In regards to the sound study, Cureton has been told that the completions job in the area will be completed around 4/24. Cureton will be setting up a second round of ambient survey monitoring equipment starting on 4/27. As we discussed, Cureton was waiting for Weld County to provide the noise development standard to understand what noise regulation the facility is going to be held to. We received communication from the Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment that the Tiger Compressor Station will held to the Colorado Revised Statute 25-12-103 for maximum permissible noise levels for a Residential Zone. These levels are 55 dBa during the day and SO dBa at night. Please let me know if you have any other questions. David Ankle I Landman C: (303) 888-3715 david .a n klecureta n m idstream .co m From: Anne Mitchell <annembm8@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, April 20, 2018 12:02 PM To: David Ankle <David.Ankle@mcdls.com> Subject: Fwd: FREE admission to the 2018 Food Revolution Summit David - Doctors - Experts on Food Safety -many specials - all well known in my field - reliable/highly respected. free on the day they present for 23 hrs after they speak in the AM - select who you or your wife most want to know about - call if question. feel free to forward to others interested in learning more about food safety . Thanks for all you do to help the communications among those in our neighborhood. The 7 day period for sound testing happened to be one of the worse for wind and drilling activity. Unfortunate. Anne M P.S. If your wife is interested in more information about health safety issues, I would be glad fo put her on my contact list or share reliable sources. -- - Forwarded message -- From: ResponsibleTechnology.org <ad min @ responsibletechnolo`gy.or`> Date: Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 6:39 AM Subject: FREE admission to the 2018 Food Revolution Summit To: annembm8@grnail.com http:/faction.responsibletechno10 y.erg/images/FRS 1200X300-20180305.png 00-20180305.pn Dear Friend, We recommend the 2018 Food Revolution Summit, starting April 28th, to gain the latest insights on CMOs, pesticides, organic foods, and to learn about the foods that can enhance brain health, prevent cancer, and add years to your life. The 24 Lop food leaders and experts in the series includes many who are experts in GMOs and pesticides: Vandana Shiva, Carey Gillam, Vani Hari, Andrew Kimbrell., Dr. David Perlmutter,Anna Lappe, and John and Ocean Robbins. Click here to sign up for the Food Revolution Summit it will change the way you think about food! When you sign up for this free summit, you get your free copy of GMO: OMG in which John and Ocean Robbins answer many question abou t GMOs in a well -researched special report that reveals the basics that everyone needs to know about GMOs. Sign up for the summit here for free and receive your GMO Report! Safe Eating, "[ear IIR"C unsubscr the Connect,. with Us U a Institute for Responsible 'technology PO Box 469 - Fairfield IA 52556 641-209-1765 info`a;responsihletechnology.org Anne Mitchell annembm8@gmail.com lierracon May 2, 2018 Mr. Nick Holland Cureton Midstream, LLC 518 17th Street, Suite 650 Denver, CO 80202 Re: Natural and Cultural Resource Assessment Cureton Midstream Compressor Station Approximately 1,000 acres Weld County, Colorado Terracon Project No. 25187255 Dear Mr. Holland: Terracon Consultants, Inc. (Terracon) appreciates the opportunity to provide Cureton Midstream, LL (client) with the following Desktop Constraints Analysis (DCA) for the above -referenced project. This project was performed in accordance with Work Order CM -WO -0096 dated April 12, 2018. 1.0 PROJECT INFORMATION 1.1 Site Description The project site is located in Weld County, Colorado and includes Section 19, Township 1 North, Range 64 West to be evaluated for environmental and construction suitability. The proposed compressor station consists primarily of farmland and open rangeland with water drainage features, water bodies,. irrigation canals, and paved, and unimproved roads. 2.0 CONSTRAINTS ANALYSIS This DCA was requested in order to assist the client with identifying specific issues that could render the project site either economically unfeasible for development or that would pose an unacceptable level of risk if development were pursued. As requested by the client, a site visit was also conducted for the site on April 25, 2018. To complete the DCA, Terracon performed a limited evaluation of the following four (4) subjects, which are discussed in Sections 2.1 through 2.4: 1) Potentially Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S., Including Wetlands 2) Protected Species (e.g., Threatened and Endangered Species) 3) Sensitive Habitats, Wildlife Areas, and Refuges 4) Section 106 — National Historic Preservation Act Terracon Consultants, Inc. 10625 W 1 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-1729 P 303-423-3300 F 303-423-3353 terracon.com Environmental ViacUJ pies' 'Ce techn cal Materials Desktop Constraints Analysis Tiger Compressor Station — Weld County, CO May 2, 2018 • Terracon Project No. 25187255 lierracon 2.1 Potentially Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S., Including Wetlands Terracon conducted a limited desktop review and site visit for the project site to evaluate potential presence of apparent jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. (WOUS), including wetlands, as defined and regulated by federal authority under 33 CFR Parts 320-330. Wetlands as defined by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE), in the Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands, (Federal Interagency Committee for Wetland Determination, 1989), are "those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions." Jurisdictional wetlands, regulated under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act/1972, Clean Water Act of 1977 and 1987, and the Farm Bills of 1985 and 1990. Terracon reviewed the following resources to evaluate the potential presence of jurisdictional Waters of the U.S., including suspected wetlands, on the project site: Topographic Map and Aerial Image Review The USGS 7.5 -Minute Topographic Quadrangle map of the project site was reviewed to identify drainages or other potential WOTUS within the project site. An apparent perennial stream (aka "blue line") is depicted on the topographic map or Google Earth aerial images and extends roughly southeast to northwest adjacent to the project site. National Wetlands Inventory Map National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) data for the project site was reviewed to identify potential wetlandiwaterbody areas. NWI data for the project site was published by the U.S. Department of the Interior's (DOI) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and depicts possible wetland areas and waterbodies based on stereoscopic analysis of high altitude aerial photographs. The review of the NWI data and aerial image illustrates a small freshwater emergent within the project area and a riverine labeled as Box Elder Creek which borders the eastern side of the property, were identified adjacent to the project site boundary. 2.2 Protected Species Federally Listed Threatened and Endangered Species Terracon searched available data from the USFWS Information, Planning and Conservation System (IPaC) Endangered Species Act species list to identify species of concern determined by the activities proposed at the project site (Attachment A). Based on a review of the website, nine (9) species are listed as potentially occurring in Weld County. These species are listed below: I 1 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2018. Information, Planning, and Conservation System (IPaC). Threated and Endangered Species Trusted Resource List for Weld County, CO. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Accessed at: http://ecos.fws.govlipaci Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable 2 Desktop Constraints Analysis Tiger Compressor Station — Weld County, CO May 2, 2018 • Terracon Project No. 25187255 lierracon Taxon Name Species Habitat Status Mammals Black -footed n ig Ferret (Mustela rip e s) Great Plains and West Intermountain Endangered Mammals Preble's Mouse (Zapus Meadow preblei) Jumping hudsonius Riparian, Front Range foothills Threatened Birds Least Tern (Sterna antillarum) Corridor Limited to the of eastern South Colorado Platte Endangered Birds Mexican Spotted occidentalis Owl lucida) (Stria. older -growth temperate forest Threatened Birds Piping Plover (Charadrius melodus) Limited corridor to the of eastern South Colorado Platte Threatened Birds Whooping Crane (Grus americana) North Platte, South Platte Rivers Endangered Fishes Pallid (Scaphirhynchus Sturgeon albus) North Platte, South Platte Rivers Endangered Flowering Plants Colorado butterfly neomexicana Plant (Laura ) Subirrigated, deposited) alluvial soils (stream Threatened Flowering Plants Lite Ladies' -tresses Riparian Meadows Threatened Flowering Plants Western Prairie Fringed Orchid North Plate, South Platte Rivers Threatened Habitats for the listed species identified were compared to desktop aerial imagery for the project site. Additionally, a site visit was conducted to verify on -site habitats. The project site consists of open irrigated farmland. Box Elder Creek and Horse Creek are located to the east outside of the project area. Because of the apparent water features adjacent to the project area, habitat for the above -mentioned species may be likely adjacent to the project footprint. No habitat for the above - mentioned species is located within the project footprint. The Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918 (MBTA) decrees that migratory birds and their parts (including eggs, nests, and feathers) are federally protected. The MBTA is the domestic law that affirms, or implements, the United States' commitment to four international conventions (with Canada, Japan, Mexico, and Russia) for the protection of a shared migratory bird resource. Each of the conventions protect selected species of birds that are common to these countries (i.e., they occur in these countries at some point during their annual life cycle). Certain birds are protected under the MBTA and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. Activities that result in a take of migratory birds or eagles is prohibited unless permitted and authorized by the USFWS. In Colorado, guidance is available that specifies temporal and spatial buffers for raptors and eagles2 (Attachment B). These buffers should be applied during construction of the pipeline, if possible. The following 17 migratory birds of concern were identified within the vicinity of the project site on the IPaC. https://cpw.state.co.us/Documents/WildlifeSpecies/LivingWithWildlife/RaptorBufferGuidelines2008.pdf Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable 3 Desktop Constraints Analysis Tiger Compressor Station — Weld County, CO May 2, 2018 • Terracon Project No. 25187255 lierracon Species Name Seasonal Occurrence in Project Area* Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) Breeds October 15 to July 31 Buff -breasted Sandpiper (Calidris subruficollis) Breeds Elsewhere Burrowing Owl (Athene cunicularia) Breeds March 15 to Aug 31 Cassin's Sparrow (Aimophila cassinii) Breeds August 1 to October 10 Chestnut -collared Longspur (Calcarius ornatus) Breeds May 1 to August 10 Golden Eagle (Aquila chrysaetos) Breeds January 1 to Aug 31 Hudsonian Godwit (Limosa haemastica) Breeds elsewhere Lark Bunting (Calamospiza melanaocorys) Breeds May 10 to Aug 15 Lesser Yellowlegs (Tringa flavipes) Breeds Elsewhere Lewis's Woodpecker (Melanerpes lewis) Breeds April 20 to September 30 Long -billed Curlew (Numenius americanus) Breeds April 1 to July 31 Mccown's Longspur Breeds May 1 to Aug 15 Mountain Plover (Charadrius Breeds April 15 to Aug 15 montanus) Semipalmated Sandpiper (Calidris pusilla) Breeds Elsewhere Whimbrel (Numenius phaeopus) Breeds Elsewhere Willet (Tringa semipalmata) Breeds April 20 to August 5 Willow Flycatcher (Empidonax traillii) Breeds May 20 to August 31 It is not anticipated that migratory birds will pose a significant constraint to project site development; however, migratory bird nest survey may be required to evaluate the potential for the presence of avian species protected by the MBTA. If adjacent habitats are to be affected, Terracon recommends surrounding areas be surveyed for ground nesting birds. Additionally, n umerous raptor nests are located near or adjacent to the project site. Mature trees and hedgerows/windbreaks are located adjacent to the project site that may contain active raptor n ests. For bald eagles, the Colorado buffer guidance states that no surface occupancy should occur within' mile radius of active nests. Human encroachment should be minimized within % mile radius of active nests from October 15 through July 31. The USFWS typically recommends that development occur outside the peak migratory bird/raptor nesting season. Buffers for other raptors that may be present in the project area are provided in Attachment B. The USFWS typically recommends that development occur outside the peak migratory bird n esting season. 2.2 Sensitive Habitats, Wildlife Areas and Refuges Terracon reviewed available databases from the USFWS IPaC to evaluate whether the project site is within identified sensitive habitats, wildlife areas, and refuges. Based on the available documentation, the proposed undertaking is not located in an area identified as sensitive habitat, a wildlife area and/or a refuge. There are no wildlife refuges or fish Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable 4 Desktop Constraints Analysis Tiger Compressor Station — Weld County, CO May 2, 2018 • Terracon Project No. 25187255 lierracon hatcheries located within the site vicinity. Therefore, this issue is not considered a constraint to development of the compressor station. 2.3 Section 106 - National Historic Preservation Act Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) applies to projects with a federal nexus. Terracon understands that there is no federal involvement in the project at this time. If a federal nexus is identified, the completion of a Cultural Resources Survey would be a potential requirement for meeting Section 106 obligations. Terracon reviewed the Colorado Historical Society -Office of Archaeology and Historical Preservations Colorado's on-line Cultural Resource Database (Compass) for cultural resources, and eligible or listed National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) resources located within a one - mile radius of the project and within the project boundary. The Compass website indicates there are no known historic property or cultural resources within the project boundary and that the project area has not been previously surveyed. The Compass search resulted in three historic farmsteads, two historic properties, and two previous surveys within a one -mile radius of the project area (Table 1). Based on review of Google Earth, the majority of the project boundary is located on rural agricultural land. The historic topographic maps indicate that there are no historic structures located within the project area of the proposed station (Quad Keenesbu rg, CO 1950). Historic and modern aerials show open agricultural land with an undeveloped dirt road running through the project area in 1948-1949. Table 1. Cultural resources within one mile of project area Site ID Name Status Description 5WL.1399 Rupple Place Not Eligible -Field Farming Complex 5WL.1400 c. 1930 Farm Complex Not Eligible -Field Farming Complex 5WL.1401 Foos Place Not Farming Complex Eligible -Field 5WL.4078.4 Denver -Hudson Canal - Segment -Field Canal Eligible 5WL.4845.1 Box - Segment -Field Canal Elder Lateral Eligible The absence of recorded historic properties or archaeological sites does not mean such resources are not present within project boundary. To more accurately evaluate potential presence of cultural resources within the project boundary, a Cultural Resources Survey should be completed to identify cultural resources, archaeological sites, and historic properties, to assess them for NRHP eligibility, and to evaluate whether historic properties may be affected by the proposed project. 3.0 SUMMARY The following is a summary of Terracon's opinion on each subject and related recommendations: § 300308. Historic property http://www.achp.govfnhpa.pdf Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable 5 Desktop Constraints Analysis Tiger Compressor Station — Weld County, CO May 2, 2018 • Terracon Project No. 25187255 lierracon • Potentially Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S., Including Wetlands: At this desktop review level, it appears that the size of the site, relative to the areas indicated as potentially jurisdictional, would allow development by avoidance of the potentially jurisdictional WOTUS. The exception to this is a wetland within the project area to the northeast. For these areas, Terracon recommends that the Client conduct a WOTUS delineation or U SACE pre -construction notification if these potential wetlands cannot be avoided. • Protected Species: Terracon searched available data from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife S ervice (USFWS) Information, Planning and Conservation System (IPaC) Endangered S pecies Act species list to identify species of concern determined by the activities proposed at the project site. Terracon conducted a site visit April 25, 2018 and encountered 4 Red-tailed hawks (Buteo jamaicensis), 2 Swainson's hawks (Buteo swainsoni), i ), and 1 American kestrel (Falco sparverius). For the red-tailed hawk, Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW) recommends a no surface occupancy (NSO) within a% mile of active nests and a seasonal restriction to human encroachment within a '�� mile of active nests from February 15 through July. For the swainsons's hawk, CPW recommends a N SO within ' mile of active nests and a season restriction to human encroachment within a 14 of active nests from April 1 through July 15. It is not anticipated that migratory birds will pose a significant constraint to site development; however, a migratory bird nest survey would be required to evaluate the potential for the presence of avian species protected by the MBTA conducted during the nesting season (generally March through August, Attachment B). If the site is cleared outside the nesting season, then a survey will not be required. The USFWS typically recommends that development occur outside the peak migratory bird nesting season. • Sensitive Area, Wildlife Habitats and Refuges: Based on the available documentation, the proposed project is not located in an area identified as sensitive habitat, a wildlife area and/or refuge. No further work is recommended for this review item. • Section 106 -National Historic Preservation Act: There are no previously recorded historic properties within the project area. The project area has not been previously surveyed. The Compass search resulted in five historic cultural resources and two previous surveys within a one -mile radius of the project area. Review of topographic maps and aerials depict open agricultural land and one dirt road in 1948-1949 within the project area. Based on the desktop review, it may be necessary to conduct a study for potential cultural and archaeological resources prior to project site development. Terracon recommends a Cultural Resource Survey (including a field survey) be completed at the property to evaluate the potential for the presence of archaeological sites and/or historic resources affected by the proposed compressor station. Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable 6 Desktop Constraints Analysis Tiger Compressor Station — We d County, CO May 2, 2018 • Terracon Project No, 25187255 4.0 LIMITATIONS This scope of services is completely preliminary fin nature. It is performed solely from a review of avaUahle public information. Normall . interviews are not conducted, regulatory agency personnel are not contacted or consulted, a site reconnaissance is not performed, samples are not octiined,. and no form of site or laboratory testing is completed, Therefore, the term Desktop" strictly applies. However, Terracon may con tact the local agency having jurisdiction concerning land use and permitting schedule questions. This should be considered a screening exercise to aid in the site selection process only. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made and use of this report is subject to the terms, including re iance, expressed in the contractua.l agreement between the client and Terracon. 5.0 CLOSING Terracon appreciates the opportunity to provide this DCA letter report to Owl Canyon Solar Center, LLC. Should you have questions, please feel free to contact us. Sincerely, Terracon constimn y lin Tyler rley Stall Scleritist/Prciect Manager Attachments A and B A. USEUSEWS IPaC Report B. Colorado Raptor Buffer Guidance C. Photo Log Aaron Maier, Certified Ecologist Natural Resources Program Manager Responsive • Resourceful in Reliable 7 ATTACHMENT A USFWS IPAC REPORT IPaC: Explore Location https: //ecos . firs .gov/ipac/location/HXTOB2SB+GBHYZJELUSJBZ3 XR.. . IPaC Information for Planning and Consultation U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service IPaC resource list This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat (collectively referred to as trust resources) under the US. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS) jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced below. The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that could potentially be directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood and extent of effects a project may have on trust resources typticalAy requires gathering additional site -specific (e1g., vegetation/species surveys), and project -specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of proposed activities) information. Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USRVS office(s) with jurisdiction in the defined project area. Please read the rntrodUctton to each section that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USEWS Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section. teNAS‘3V Location Weld County, Colorado .:rirN-(I: e Local office Colorado Ecological Services Held Office k. (303) 236-4773 Mil (303) 236-4005 MAILING ADDRESS Denver Federal Center 1of13 5/1/2018, 1:22 PM IPaC: Explore Location https: //ecos . firs .gov/ipac/location/HXTOB2SB+GBHYZJELUSJBZ3 XR.. . P.O. Box 25486 Denver, CO80225-0486 PHYSICAL ADDRESS 134 Union Boulevard, Suite 670 Lakewood, CO 80228-1807 http://www.fws.goviicoloradoES http://www.fws.goviplatteriver „5.1/4p:45:\S"\ '3'- 2 ofl3 5/1/2018, 1:22 PM IPaC: Explore Location https: //ecos . firs .gov/ipac/location/HXTOB25BGBHYZJELU5JBZ3 XR.. . Enc angerec species This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of project level impacts. The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species. Additional areas of influence (AOl) for species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of the species range if the species could be indirectly affected by activities in that area (e.g., placing a dam upstream of a fish population, even if that fish does not occur at the dam site, may indirectly impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow downstream). Because species can move, and site conditions can change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the project area. To fully determine any potential effects to species, additional site -specific and project -specific information is often required. Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request 6f the Secretary information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be lusted may be present in the area of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted, funded, or licensed by any Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list which fulfills this requirement can only be obtained by requesting an official species list from either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC (see directions beiow) or from the local field office directly. For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC website and request an official species list by doing the following:. 1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE. I. Click DEFINE PROJECT. 3. Log in (if directed to do so). 4. Provide a name and description for your project. S. Click REQUEST SPECIES UST. Listed species1 and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOM Fisheries -4). Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this list. Please contact NOAA Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction. 1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also shows species that are candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for more information. 2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NM FS), is an office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce. The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location: 3 of 13 5/1/2018, 1:22 PM IPaC: Explore Location https: //ecos . firs .gov/ipac/location/HXTOB25B+GBHYZJELUSJBZ3 XR.. . Mammals NAME STATUS Preble's Meadow jumping Mouse Zapus hLldsonius preblei Threatened There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. https://ecos.f s.gov/ecp/species/4090 Birds NAME STATUS Least Tern Sterna anti laru•m This species only needs to be considered if the following condition applies: • Water -related activities/use in the N. Platte, Si Platte and Laramie River Basins may affect listed species in Nebraska. No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https«J/ecos,f s.gov/ecp/species/8505 Mexican Spotted Owl Strix occidental's lucida There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is.. o utside the critical habitat. ilk -sa. https //ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8196 4% Piping Plover Charadrius melodus This species only needs to be considered if the following condition, applies: • Water -related activities/use in the N. Platte, S. Platte and Laramie River Basins may affect listed species in Nebraska. There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is o utside the critical habitat. tittps://ecos.fwsagoviecp/specJes/6039 Whooping Crane Gres americana This species only needs to be considered if the following condition applies: • Water -related activities/use in the N, Platte, S. Platte and Larar-nie River Basins may affect listed species in Nebraska. There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. https://ecos.fvvs.goviecpispecies/758 Fishes Endangered Thr�a+tene Threatened Endangered 4of13 5/1/2018, 1:22 PM IPaC: Explore Location https: //ecos . firs .gov/ipac/location/HXTOB2SB+GBHYZJELUSJBZ3 XR.. . NAME STATUS Pallid Sturgeon Scaphirhynchus a bus This species only needs to be considered if the following condition applies: • Water -related activities/use in the N. Platte, S. Platte and Laramie River Basins may affect listed species in Nebraska. No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.f s.g,ov/ecp/species/7162 Flowering Plants NAME Endangered STATUS Colorado Butterfly Plant Gaura neomexicana var, Threatened coloradensis There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. httpsiiecos. s.gc rtecp'species/6i 10 Ute Ladies' -tresses Spiranthes di uvi.alis NON4ift, a ened No critical habitat has been designated for this species. h tpsn/A ecos. s.gov/ecp/species/21 59 rfl Western Prairie Fringed Orchid Platanthera praeclara Threatened This species only needs to be considered if the following condition applies: • water -related activities/use in the N41. Platte, S. Platte and Laramie River Basins may affect listed species in Nebraska. No critical habitat has been designated for this species. httpsJ ecosa As.go'Y/ e p! species/1 669 sdr \L-0 assiek‘' Critical habitats Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered species themselves, THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS AT THIS LOCATION. Migratory birds Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act' and the Bald and Golden 5of13 5/1/2018, 1:22 PM IPaC: Explore Location https: //ecos . firs .gov/ipac/location/HXTOB2SB+GBHYZTELUSJBZ3 XR.. . Eagle Protection Act2. Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities thatmay result in impacts to migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below. 1, The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918. 2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 19404 Additional information can be found using the following links: • Birds of Conservation Concern http:// w.fws,govlbirds/many ement/managed-species/ birds-Qf-conservatlQn-concern.pbp 9 Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds http://www.fws.govibirds [ma nazementip�roject-a sessment-tools_and- uidance.i conservation-measu res.php • Nationwide conservation measures for birds hilp://www.fws.govimigratorybirds df/mana.. ement/nation+idestandardconservationmeasures,df. p p 11/4 The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the LJSEWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E -bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be found below. For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and breeding in your project area. NAME BREEDNG SEASON (FA BREEDING SEASON IS INDICATED FOR A BIRD ON YOUR LIST? THE BIRD MAY BREED IN YOUR PROJECT AREA, SOMETIME WITHIN THE T MEFRAME PECIE ED, WHICH IS AVERY LIBERAL ESTIMATE OF THE DATES INSIDE WVHCHTHE 6 of 13 5/1/2018, 1:22 PM IPaC: Explore Location https: //ecos . firs .gov/ipac/location/HXTOB2SB+GBHYZJELUSJBZ3 XR.. . BIRD BREEDS ACROSS ITS ENTIRE RANGE. "BREEDS ELSEWHERE" INDICATES THAT THE BIRD DOES NOT LIKELY BREED IN YOUR PROJECT AREA) Bald Eagle Ha l iaeetus leucocephalus This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities. Cassin's Sparrow Airmophila cassinii This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions ions (BCRs) in the continental USA hr psu/ d ecosa■ IIMs.govr ecp! species1 O51 2 Golden Eagle Aquila chrsaetos This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA h ttpsJ/ecoslws.gov/ecp/species/1680 Lark Bunting CaIanospiza me anocor s This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA iiisitcot Lesser Yellowlegs Tringa flavipes This is a Bird of conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. httpsJ/ecos, rs..gov/ecRJspecie5/9C79 Fillet Trirga semipalrnata This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. Willow Flycatcher E rn pi d ona tra i l i i This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA https://ecos.fr rs.go /ecp/species/ 482 Probability of Presence Summary Breeds Oct 15 to Jul 31 Breeds Aug 1 to Oct 10 Breeds Jan 1 to Aug 31 ‘L lit so Breeds May 10 to Aug 15 Breeds elsewhere Breeds Apr 20 to Aug 5 Breeds May 20 to Aug 31 The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are mostlikely to be present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and 7 of 13 5/1/2018, 1:22 PM IPaC: Explore Location https: //ecos . firs .gov/ipac/location/HXTOB2SB+GBHYZTELUSJBZ3 XR.. . u nderstand the FAQ Proper Interpretation and use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before u sing or attempting to interpret this report. Probability of Presence ( ) Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4 -week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score, one can have higher confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high. How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps: 1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is 0.25. 2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05,, and that the probability of presence at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on week 12 is 0.5/0.5 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2. 3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of presence score. To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar. Breeding Season Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project area. Survey Effort (I) Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys performed for that species in the 1 0km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys. To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hoveryour mouse cursor over the bar. No Data (—) A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week. Survey Timeframe efra m e surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based o n all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse. 8of13 5/1/2018, 1:22 PM IPaC: Explore Location https: //ecos . firs .gov/ipac/location/HXTOB2SB+GBHYZTELUSJBZ3 XR.. . probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data SPECI:S Bald Eagle Non -BCC Vulnerable (This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for po ten dal susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities.) Cassin's Sparrow BCC-BCR(Thisisa Bird ofConservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA) Golden Eagle BCC - BCR (This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions {SCRs) in the continental USA) Lark Bunting BCC - BCR (This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA) Lesser Yellowlegs BCC Range ,►ide (CON) (This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.) Wi I I et BCC Rangeide (CON) (This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.) IAN FEB MAR A')R IVA)/ JUN ,UL AUG SEP 0CT NOV L'EC NI i i I I - I- 4 0 -le ele -Ie I 1 r - r r - 1 14� -1 -,_ — lespe r .r �IN I- P - •-•1••• .-r••• II I IP"- 4 — �,_ .f 9 of 13 5/1/2018, 1:22 PM IPaC: Explore Location https: //ecos . firs .gov/ipac/location/HXTOB2SB+GBHYZJELUSJBZ3 XR.. . Willow Flycatcher BCC - BCR (This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA) I i i I I Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds. Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures and/or permits may be advisable depending on the type of activipi a e conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species present on your project site. What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location? I The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) and other species that may warrant special attention in your project locationa It I The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Kno hedge Network (A N). The MN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science dattaseis and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid [elks) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Ad requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or development. Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the E -bird Explore Data Tool. What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location? The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory biro' list are based on data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link. How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my project area? To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (Le. breeding, wintering, migrating or year-round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or (if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds guide. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, 10 of 13 5/1/2018, 1:22 PM IPaC: Explore Location https: //ecos . firs .gov/ipac/location/HXTOB2SB+GBHYZTELUSJBZ3 XR.. . if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area. What are the levels of concern for migratory birds? Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern: 1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands); 2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and B. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles) potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing). lieli Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to ahl birds, efforts should be made, i particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this lint, especially eagles and BCCspeci. sof rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can implement to hetavv i and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics. 4.0 4 Deta i I s about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects\;\ q' fik For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of bird species within your project area off the Mantic. Coast please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOM NCC0S Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf project webpage. Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring. What if I have eagles on my list? if your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur. Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "''hat does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component If the survey effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about 11 of 13 5/1/2018, 1:22 PM IPaC: Explore Location https: //ecos . firs .gov/ipac/location/HXTOB2SB+GBHYZTELUSJBZ3 XR.. . presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page. Facilities National Wildlife Refuge lands Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a 'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges 4Ph:to discuss any questions or concerns. °` r HERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS AI 4 H15 LOCAI lONCatlatr \3/44144.1 Fish hatcheries THERE ARE NO FISH HATCHERIES .TTHIS LOCATION Wet ands in the National Wetlands Inventory Impacts to (DWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act or other State/Federal statutes. For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of Engineers District. Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to update our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine the actual extent of wetlands on site. This location overlaps the following wetlands: FRESHWATER EMERGENT WETLAND PEMC 12 of 13 5/1/2018, 1:22 PM IPaC: Explore Location https: //ecos . firs .gov/ipac/location/HXTOB25BGBHYZJELU5JBZ3 XR.. . A full description for each wetland code can be found at the National Wetlands Inventory website site Data limitations The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level information on the location, type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A margin of error is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any particular site may result in revision of the wetland boundaries or classification established through image analysis. The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts, the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work conducted_ Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any mapping problems. Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There may be occasional differences in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted on the map and the actual conditions on site, Data exclusions Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal waters. Some deep►water reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded from the inventory. These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery. Data precautions Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe wetlands in a different manner than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local government or to establish the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons intending to engage in activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate federal state, or local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may affect such activities. 13 of 13 5/1/2018, 1:22 PM ATTACHMENT B COLORADO RAPTOR BUFFER GUIDANCE RECOMMENDED BUFFER ZONES AND SEASONAL RESTRICTIONS FOR COLORADO RAPTORS Tolerance limits to disturbance vary among as well as within raptor species. As a general rule, Ferruginous Hawks and Golden Eagles respond to human activities at greater distances than do Ospreys and America Kestrels. Some individuals within a species also habituate and tolerate human activity at a proximity that would cause the majority of the group to abandon their nests. Other individuals become sensitized to repeated encroachment and react at greater distances. The tolerance of a particular pair may change when a mate is replaced with a less tolerant individual and this may cause the pair to react to activities that were previously ignored. Responses will also vary depending upon the reproductive stage. Although the level of stress is the same, the pair may be more secretive during egg laying and incubation and more demonstrative when the chicks hatch. The term "disturbance" is ambiguous and experts disagree on what actually constitutes a disturbance. Reactions may be as subtle as elevated pulse rate or as obvious as vigorous defense or abandonment. Impacts of disturbance may not be immediately evident. A pair of raptors may respond to human intrusion by defending the nest, but well after the disturbance has passed, the male may remain in the vicinity for protection rather than forage to feed the nestlings. Golden eagles rarely defend their nests, but merely fly a half mile or more away and perch and watch. Chilling and over heating of eggs or chicks and starvation of nestlings can result from human activities that appeared not to have caused an immediate response. A `holistic' approach is recommended when protecting raptor habitats. While it is important for land managers to focus on protecting nest sites, equal attention should focus on defining important foraging areas that support the pair's nesting effort Hunting habitats of many raptor species are extensive and may necessitate interagency cooperation to assure the continued nest occupancy. Unfortunately, basic knowledge of habitat use is lacking and may require documentation through telemetry investigations or intensive observation. Telemetry is expensive and may be disruptive so a more practical approach is to assume that current open space is important and should be protected. Although there are exceptions, the buffer areas and seasonal restrictions suggested here reflect an informed opinion that if implemented, should assure that the majority of individuals within a species will continue to occupy the area. Additional factors, such as intervening terrain, vegetation screens, and the cumulative impacts of activities should be considered. These guidelines were originally developed by CDOW raptor biologist Gerald R. Craig (retired) in December 2002. To provide additional clarity in guidance, incorporate new information, and update the conservation status of some species, the guidelines were revised in January 2008. Further revisions of this document may become necessary as additional information becomes available. RECOMMENDED BUFFER ZONES AND SEASONAL RESTRICTIONS BALD EAGLE Nest Site: No surface occupancy (beyond that which historically occurred in the area; see `Definitions' below) within 1/. mile radius of active nests (see `Definitions' below). Seasonal restriction to human encroachment (see `Definitions' below) within 1/2 mile radius of active nests from October 15 through July 31. This closure is more extensive than the National Bald Eagle Management Guidelines (USFWS 2007) due to the generally open habitat used by Colorado's nesting bald eagles. Winter Night Roost: No human encroachment from November 15 through March 15 within 1/4 mile radius of an active winter night roost (see `Definitions' below) if there is no direct line of sight between the roost and the encroachment activities. No human encroachment from November 15 through March 15 within 1/2 mile radius of an active winter night roost if there is a direct line of sight between the roost and the encroachment activities. If periodic visits (such as oil well maintenance work) are required within the buffer zone after development, activity should be restricted to the period between 1000 and 1400 hours from November 15 to March 15. Hunting Perch: Diurnal hunting perches (see `Definitions' below) associated with important foraging areas should also be protected from human encroachment. Preferred perches may be at varying distances from human encroachment and buffer areas will vary. Consult the Colorado Division of Wildlife for recommendations for specific hunting perches. GOLDEN EA GL E Nest Site: No surface occupancy (beyond that which historically occurred in the area) within 1/4 mile radius of active nests. Seasonal restriction to human encroachment within 1/2 mile radius of active nests from December 15 through July 15. OSPREY Nest Site: No surface occupancy (beyond that which historically occurred in the area) within 1/4 mile radius of active nests. Seasonal restriction to human encroachment within 1/4 mile radius of active nests from April 1 through August 31. Some osprey populations have habituated and are tolerant to human activity in the immediate vicinity of their nests. FERRUGINOUS HAWK Nest Site: No surface occupancy (beyond that which historically occurred in the area) within 1/2 mile radius of active nests. Seasonal restriction to human encroachment within 1/2 mile radius of active nests from February 1 through July 15. This species is especially prone to nest abandonment during incubation if disturbed. RED-TAILED HAWK Nest Site: No surface occupancy (beyond that which historically occurred in the area) within 1/3 mile radius of active nests. Seasonal restriction to human encroachment within 1/3 mile radius of active nests from February 15 through July 15. Some members of this species have adapted to urbanization and may tolerate human habitation to within 200 yards of their nest. Development that encroaches on rural sites is likely to cause abandonment. SWAINSON'S HAWK Nest Site: No surface occupancy (beyond that which historically occurred in the area) within 1/4 mile radius of active nests. Seasonal restriction to human encroachment within 4 mile radius of active nests from April 1 through July 15. Some members of this species have adapted to urbanization and may tolerate human habitation to within 100 yards of their nest. PEREGRINE FALCON Nest Site: No surface occupancy (beyond that which historically occurred in the area) within 1/2 mile radius of active nests. Seasonal restriction to human encroachment within 1/2 mile of the nest cliffs) from March 15 to July 31. Due to propensity to relocate nest sites, sometimes up to 1/2 mile along cliff faces, it is more appropriate to designate 'Nesting Areas' that encompass the cliff system and a 1/2 mile buffer around the cliff complex. PRAIRIE FALCON Nest Site: No surface occupancy (beyond that which historically occurred in the area) within 1/2 mile radius of active nests. Seasonal restriction to human encroachment within 1/2 mile radius of active nests from March 15 through July 15. NORTHERN GOSHAWK No surface occupancy (beyond that which historically occurred in the area) within 1/2 mile radius of active nests. Seasonal restriction to human encroachment within 1/2 mile radius of active nests from March 1 through September 15. BURROWING OWL Nest Site: No human encroachment within 150 feet of the nest site from March 15 through October 31. Although Burrowing Owls may not be actively nesting during this entire period, they may be present at burrows up to a month before egg laying and several months after young have fledged. Therefore it is recommended that efforts to eradicate prairie dogs or destroy abandoned towns not occur between March 15 and October 31 when owls may be present Because nesting Burrowing Owls may not be easily visible, it is recommended that targeted surveys be implemented to determine if burrows are occupied. More detailed recommendations are available in a document entitled "Recommended Survey Protocol and Actions to Protect Nesting Burrowing Owls" which is available from the Colorado Division of Wildlife Recommended Buffer Zones and Seasonal Restrictions Around Raptor Use Sites Species and Use Buffer Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Bald Eagle ACTIVE NEST - No Surface Occupancy % Mile ACTIVE NEST - No Human Encroachment 1/2 Mile ACTIVE WINTER NIGHT ROOST without a direct line of sight- No Human Encroachment '/ Mile ACTIVE WINTER direct line of sight NIGHT ROOST with a - No Human Encroachment 1/2 Mile HUNTING PERCH - No Human Encroachment Contact CDOW Golden Eagle ACTIVE NEST - No Surface Occupancy ' Mile ACTIVE NEST - No Human Encroachment '/2 Mile Osprey ACTIVE NEST - No Surface Occupancy ' Mile ACTIVE NEST - No Human Encroachment ' Mile Ferruginous Hawk ACTIVE NEST - No Surface Occupancy 1 Mile ACTIVE NEST - No Human Encroachment 1/2 Mile Red-tailed Hawk ACTIVE NEST - No Surface Occupancy 1/3 Mile ACTIVE NEST - No Human Encroachment 1/3 Mile Swainson's Hawk ACTIVE NEST - No Surface Occupancy % Mile ACTIVE NEST - No Human Encroachment ' Mile Peregrine Falcon ACTIVE NEST - No Surface Occupancy '/z Mile ACTIVE NEST - No Human Encroachment '/2 Mile Prairie Falcon ACTIVE NEST - No Surface Occupancy '/2 Mile ACTIVE NEST - No Human Encroachment '/z Mile Northern Goshawk ACTIVE NEST - No Surface Occupancy '/2 Mile ACTIVE NEST - No Human Encroachment 'A Mile Burrowing Owl ACTIVE NEST - No Human Encroachment 150 feet = time period for which seasonal restrictions are in place. DEFINIT IONS Active nest — Any nest that is frequented or occupied by a raptor during the breeding season, or which has been active in any of the five previous breeding seasons. Many raptors use alternate nests in various years. Thus, a nest may be active even if it is not occupied in a given year. Active winter night roost — Areas where Bald Eagles gather and perch overnight, and sometimes during the day in the event of inclement weather. Communal roost sites are usually in large trees (live or dead) that are relatively sheltered from wind and are generally in close proximity to foraging areas. These roosts may also serve a social purpose for pair bond formation and communication among eagles. Many roost sites are used year after year. Human encroachment — Any activity that brings humans in the area. Examples include driving, facilities maintenance, boating, trail access (e.g., hiking, biking), etc. Hunting perch Any structure on which a raptor perches for the purpose of hunting for prey. Hunting perches provide a view of suitable foraging habitat. Trees are often used as hunting perches, but other structures may also be used (utility poles, buildings, etc.). Surface occupancy — Any physical object that is intended to remain on the landscape permanently or for a significant amount of time. Examples include houses, oil and gas wells, tanks, wind turbines, roads, tracks, etc. CONT ACT For further information contact: David Klute Bird Conservation Coordinator Colorado Division of Wildlife 6060 Broadway Denver, CO 80216 Phone: 303-291-7320 Email: david.kluteAstate.co.us REFERENCES Bechard, M.J., and J.K. Schmutz. 1995. Ferruginous Hawk (Buteo regalis), The Birds of North America Online (A. Poole, Ed.). Ithaca: Cornell Lab of Ornithology; Retrieved from the Birds of North America Online: http ://bn a.b irds.corne ll .edu/bna/species/ 172 Buehler, D.A. 2000. Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), The Birds of North America Online (A. Poole, Ed.). Ithaca: Cornell Lab of Ornithology; Retrieved from the Birds of North America Online: http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bnalspecies/506 Call, M. 1979. Habitat management guides for birds of prey. Technical Note No.338, U.S. Bureau of Land Management, Denver Service Center, Denver, CO. 69pp. Energy Research and Development Administration (ERDA). 1977. EIA for CIJI Venture application for geothermal loan guarantee (Beryl and Lund, Utah). EIA/GE/77-8. Washington, D.C. 109pp. England, A.S., M.J. Bechard, and C.S. Houston. 1997. Swainson's Hawk (Buteo swainsoni), The Birds of North America Online (A. Poole, Ed.). Ithaca: Cornell Lab of Ornithology; Retrieved from the Birds of North America Online: http ://bna. b irds.cornel l.edu/bna/species/2 65 Greater Yellowstone Bald Eagle Working Group. 1996. Greater Yellowstone bald eagle management plan: 1995 update. Greater Yellowstone Bald Eagle Working Group, Wyoming Game & Fish Dept., Lander WY 82520. 47p Grier, J.W., F.J. Gramlich, J. Mattisson, J.E. Mathisen, J.V. Kussman, J.B. Elder, and N.F. Green. 1983. The bald eagle in the northern United States. Bird Cons. 144-66. Haug, E.A., B.A. Millsap, and M.S. Martell. 1993. Burrowing Owl (Athene cunicularia), The Birds of North America Online (A. Poole, Ed.). Ithaca: Cornell Lab of Ornithology; Retrieved from the Birds of North America Online: http ://bna. b irds.cornel l.eduf bnaispecies/0 61 Holmes, Tamara L. 1993. Behavioral responses of grassland raptors to human disturbance. MS Thesis. Colo. State Univ., Fort Collins. 62pp. Holthuijzen, A.M.A., W.G. Eastland, A.R. Ansell, M.N. Kochert, R.D. Williams, and L.S. Young. 1990. Effects of blasting on behavior and productivity of nesting prairie falcons. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 18:270-281. Kochert, M. N., K. Steenhof, C. L. Mcintyre, and E. H. Craig. 2002. Golden Eagle (Aquila chrysaetos), The Birds of North America Online (A. Poole, Ed.). Ithaca: Cornell Lab of Ornithology; Retrieved from the Birds of North America Online: h ttp: //bn a.birds.cornel l.edu/bna/species/C 84 Martin, D.J. 1973. Selected aspects of burrowing owl ecology and behavior. Condor 75:446-456. Northern States Bald Eagle Recovery Team. 1983. Northern States Bald Eagle Recovery Plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 75pp. Ol endorflf, R. R., and W.D. Zeedyk. 1978. Land management for the conservation of endangered birds. Pages 419-428 in S.A. Temple, ed. Endangered birds. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin. Poole, A.F., R.O. Bierregaard, and M.S. Martell. 2002. Osprey (Pandion haliaetus), The Birds of North America Online (A. Poole, Ed.). Ithaca: Cornell Lab of Ornithology; Retrieved from the Birds of North America Online: http :/./bna. b irds.cornel l .edu?bnalspecies/6 83 Preston, C.R., and R.D. Beane. 1993. Red-tailed Hawk (Buteo j a inai c en sis), The Birds of North America Online (A. Poole, Ed.). Ithaca: Cornell Lab of Ornithology; Retrieved from the Birds ofNorth America Online: http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/052 Reynolds, R., R.T. Graham, H.M. Reiser. 1992. Management recommendations for the northern goshawk in the southwestern United States. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM -217. Fort Collins, CO. U.S. Dept of Agri., Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 90pp. Richardson, C.T. and C.K. Miller. 1997. Recommendations for protecting raptors from human disturbance: a review. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 25(3):634-638. Rocky Mountain/Southwest Peregrine Falcon Recovery Team. 1984. American peregrine falcon Rocky Mountain/Southwest population recovery plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Serve 105pp. Squires, J.R., S.H. Anderson, and R. Oakleaf. 1993. Home range size and habitat -use patterns of nesting prairie falcons near oil developments in northeastern Wyoming. J. Field Ornithol. 64:1- 10. Steenhof, Karen. 1998. Prairie Falcon (F ales mexieanus), The Birds of North America Online Poole, Ed.). Ithaca: Cornell Lab of Ornithology; Retrieved from the Birds of North America Online: http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/346 Squires, J.R., and R.T. Reynolds. 1997. Northern Goshawk (Accipiter gentilis), The Birds of North America Online (A. Poole, Ed.). Ithaca: Cornell Lab of Ornithology; Retrieved from the Birds of North America Online: http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/298 Suter, G.W. and J.L. Joness. 1981. Criteria for Golden Eagle, Ferruginous Hawk, and Prairie Falcon nest site protection. J. Raptor Res. 15(1):12-18. Swenson, J.E. 1979. Factors affecting status and reproduction of ospreys in Yellowstone National Park. J. Wildl. Manage. 43:595-601. Thomsen, L. 1971. Behavior and ecology of burrowing owls on the Oakland Municipal Airport. Condor 73:177-192. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2007. National Bald Eagle Management Guidelines. http://www.fws.govimigratorybirds/issues/BaldEagle/NationalBaldEagleManagementGuideline s.pdf White, C.M., N.J. Clum, T.J. Cade, and W.G. Hunt 2002. Peregrine Falcon (Falco peregrinus), The Birds of North America Online (A. Poole, Ed.). Ithaca: Cornell Lab of Ornithology; Retrieved from the Birds of North America Online: http://bna.birds.cornell.edu./bnalspecies/660 Revised 02/2008 APPENDIX C PH T • LOG Appendix C — Photo Log TigerCompressor Station — Weld County, CO May 2, 2018 • Terracon Project No. 25187255 lierracon o-nn•EMI! on - 4« . u - I - ice= f m t - nalrI. AdCt- - alma" ._.nom=- i•rt�' -•a '" `• n -mil' ..'�' o' rs+. 1- - - .ter cj 3•re • ^F".T s_ •rl „ - . -i J - _� 'a , of _ i ,�. .ti�� y�}.�� _. Les -i- r ` +.a-•14 J a- Sup"- we - Jru_*� T { -_tg.Zei ts2.44. Y ami4 -2 eft F_._ - 1. fin c =— tear_ 'all_ f i •a' - ) I. - �1. a 41 e r t . I na. - Y- :t,i y Tsar + ..a rj . Tt a. j: - Photo 1: Project area looking north. • -a I.*I Mrn -1 sir ��,`• .. a • er- r .-9:4 y • Y - 4 i 3' 1 Appendix C — Photo Log TigerCompressor Station — Weld County, CO May 2, 2018 • Terracon Project No. 25187255 lierracon Photo 2: Project area looking west. 'Furl 2 Appendix C — Photo Log TigerCompressor Station — Weld County, CO May 2, 2018 • Terracon Project No. 25187255 lierracon Photo 3: Project area looking south. 3 Appendix C — Photo Log TigerCompressor Station — Weld County, CO May 2, 2018 • Terracon Project No. 25187255 lierracon Photo 4: Project area looking east. 4 Appendix C — Photo Log Tiger Compressor Station — Weld County, CO May 2, 2018 • Terracon Project No. 25187255 lierracon Photo 5: Open farmland to the north. 5 Appendix C — Photo Log Tiger Compressor Station — Weld County, CO May 2, 2018 ■ Terracon Project No. 25187255 Photo 6: Box Elder Creek adjacent to project area. lierracon 6 Appendix C — Photo Log TigerCompressor Station — Weld County, CO May 2, 2018 • Terracon Project No. 25187255 lierracon Photo 7: Center of project area looking south. ..ter vlcl. ''.r Y.+Y.e- • - - •e aty,,..' rar4art-017P� �" .0 �x- . ,ry*a N47,3.42- - ina'q tv • - i sme o r'— •c `,� - u,_ -. r-ftP'�X� • w . S■ l'1 9„�y�'pw� y� ti '.� nel -� t ... T : y'C {'N; a . al:12:447:44 �•^ __ _a r4'F 'r,YT7'• a. .4:4_, may '�M7T'3•.+.iri4dr •9.,. • -Z6 1 �x Irisrl �}4 x�i #k��i• .� r�aw3-5 -w• LA« Er • • 1 y- �saarta ay, 1.J.\fi▪ ll 4 _..�_ -..'sir.. la - , - - - - a 1JY ai.PP 2,4c. • .- a w t ad - y,�� M� t4.4411-1 .. - - 'f4 Fa> - : w31( ar •.t'r.,"`«�'"-'T+ 'rte _ '4� flyly 11 c_.... _ .14P' Y�� If�! w,.�� 1-1 $, `'S • �`' ]• ✓%9, 1. . +''w aqua a m '7 I:. J ;r s-. j , A- mot a -Tih Pa f ,tp3at� 9� i ` l iia t— . . c r .14 SFr -- F ..F_.a ..a ys►t�-•� Self te' ��._. b.+. _.y <. 9r "Raba 'Inf 4.a .a v: -, ..,�-.S*lil�Yii�i�s`��s�Fiplr.N�ia_ IY�_��6 • left- a loc war f a 7 -.[ ,��t! g 5 x.L" 4T„� j�Y',fey�.t�`i ' F y .f 2-h _ a •_. f6f-Rb,vaYls 1R..LYL ,y�y. val} �' -▪ .'1 5 _ t. _� Appendix C — Photo Log Tiger Compressor Station — Weld County, CO May 2, 2018 ■ Terracon Project No. 25187255 6 Photo 8: American Kestrel on site, ileracon 8 OUREThN MIDSTREAM 518 17th Street Ste 650 Denver, CO 80202 (720) 390-4555 into►@ouretonmidstrewm.com Tiger Compressor Station Community Meeting April 5, 2018 ral CURETh '1/41V MIDSTREAM Who is Cureton • Who? The Cureton management team consists of over 90 years of combined experience in the oil & gas industry. Previous employers include: Honeywell uop CALIBER MIDSTREAM ^ rres 001:::77c7071:: MIDSTREAM Bill Barrett Corporation Williamsact-escrtr A ICA • Where? Weld County Headquarters in Keenesburg, , Colorado at 31631 County Road 398 Denver, Colorado Corporate Offices • What? WILDCAT LDCAT MIDSTREAM ?AR,TNERS energu group0 Ic A natural gas gathering and processing infrastructure system, "Midstream System", located along the 1-76 corridor in Weld County EXCELLENCE INTEGRITY TRUST 2 (MI CURETh '44V MIDSTREAM Midstream Purpose in Weld Countv Cureton Proposed Processing Facility i IMO CIG/ Xcel Energy Inter/ Intrastate Pipelines Power Plant House Gas Meter 00 000 Local Distribution Company Cureton's facilities are key pieces tor providing cost- efficient Energy to Weld County and Colorado. Power Lines Electric Meter Electheity • Lights • Refrigerator • TV • Air Conditioner CURETh '1/4V7 MIDSTREAM Natural Gas Lifecycle: Wellhead to Market, Cureton's Role Downstrea m 1 • Drilling • Completion • Production m1/4 r• Gathering • Processing • Storage • Fractionation • Manufacturing • Distribution J I J `Market: Enid user J IWellheads I Distribution Center lakm ICornpresSor Separator ICooling System I Processing Facility 1 4 ra CURETh '441V MIDSTREAM What Happens at a Compressor Staflon r e° R+.J.. VY��tiVdr'I..f.�.1 •-rrr rrtt. �.1tY.4.-m{.'.t .YY •!C^ �1_ ir. f 40.1 _ !fill AA • • P .' • Tiger Compressor is currently designed with 2 90 BBL tanks. General Schematic Drawing for the Tiger Compressor Station. SUBJECT TO CHANGE 241 WRETh I Vr MIDSTREAM Safety Plan • Safety is of the Utmost Importance • Design Conditions: Compressor station follows 49 CFR 192 and ASME B31.3 • 49 CFR 192- Department of Transportation Regulation over onshore pipeline systems • ASME B31.3- American Society of Mechanical Engineers governance over process piping within facilities Operations: • 24/7 Control Monitoring- Trained pipeline control operators continuously monitor pressure, flow, temperature, and other operating data to provide real time oversight of operations • Leak Detection, Computational Pipeline Monitoring (CPM)- CPM uses SCADA data to perform real time hydraulic modeling for leak detection. • Emergency Response Plan- Cureton will have an Emergency response Plan in place that must be submitted to the county and state before operations begin. WRETh I Nk7 MIDSTREAM Why is this PrQject Needed? • Supports Cureton's Front Range Gas Plant Project — Received Weld County Board of County Commission approval Feb. 28, 2018 • Oil and Gas producers in Weld County actively applying latest drilling technologies constantly improving well productivities New pipelines needed to gather and transport gas • Total Production outpacing Processing Capacity New Processing capacity is necessary to effectively handle volumes both today and in the future • Safety and Waste Legacy gathering systems were not designed to handle new volume and pressure for Horizontal Weld County Production eadingto over -pressured pipeliiW. Tiger Compressor Project provides important infrastructure that supports all of the above WRETh I MIDSTREAM Site Selection Technical: Close to future well pads Accessible power Along existing pipeline corridor Uft12811:1 Farms Q x11 - Operations: Great road access Centrally located to gathering system 1B. m 4 f`b Gi rein Tiger Compressor Station I Permitting: Site located outside of Floodplain Air permit has been submitted Zoned agricultural 1hhe�.c colirry Avid t Mod C:4( Rota a litter Comely [fond 8 WRETh MIDSTREAM Tiger Compressor Station Design Major components (Subject to Change) • 4 compressors • 2 90 BBL Tanks • Slug catcher • Separator • Metering • Dehydration equipment Small building, small tanks, other associated equipment and piping • Most equipment will be horizontal or close to ground level Exceptions are the combustor at 30' tall and dehydration tower at 49' tall • Combustor has an enclosed flame, i.e. not open flames • Operations: 2-3 pickup trucks per day with occasional water truck Facility will be monitored from central facility seven miles to the north R ET aj MIDST Our Commitment to Safety, Environment, and Health Stc Work Authori All employees exercise and Stop contractors on Work Authority Cureton to corn locations m u n i cate are safety authorized concerns to Total Recordable rdable Incident Rate "TRIR" In 2017, our employee year TRIR, was (recordable an industry incident leading per 100 0.0. workers) for the Corporate Safety Strategy Safety is built into corporate performance goals Community Engagement Ongoing neighbor communication for awareness and feedback Inte g ri Mena g ernent Plan Cureton will testing utilize cathodic to ensure protection, proper � � compliance � smart pigging, of all safety ultrasonic and systems Y PSV Process Safety Management Compliance with OSHA Standards p Station Shutdown Ca p abiltiies°ors' 24/7/365 Remote Gas Onsite shutdown Plant is manual located capabilities shutdown RCompressor 7 mile form sot capabilities. the our Gas north. Plant Control American Society of Mechanical Engineers SETTING THE STANDARD Safety Standards Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration 4 SA US De p omens tai lions c$ion Pipeline and Hazardous ,Materials Solely Administration Occupational Safety and Health Administration 10 rZBURET MIDST Environmental Water Quality • Considerations - Groundwater - Stormwater • Cureton safeguards In place - Integrity management Best management practices Engineered drainage and grading plan — Stormwater management plan and permit — Above -ground piping — Closed drain systems - Secondary containment - Considerations Potential pollutants Emissions Cureton safeguards in place — Air permit - Fugitive emissions program — Closed looped systems for gas and liquids The Tiger Compressor Station is regulated by multiple local, state and federal agencies COLO RA DO Department of Public Health & Environment OSHA 11 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT fa CURETh I '44V MIDSTREAM Emergency Preparedness Cureton has engaged emergency planners and first responders to ensure Ply -Active Planning • Weld County Office of Emergency Management - Roy Rudisill (Director) • Hudson Fire Department - Chief Ken Gabrielson (Fire Chief) Ongoing Training • On -Site facility walk- through (Pre -operations) •Annual ICS table top exercises Emergency Preparedness Partners ounty LEPC c Local Emergency Planning Committee Cureton is committed to tfyif10 uinnly' riepaleulie'Ss • Reverse 911 for cell phones • Promote participation campaign in the community through collaboration with Office of Emergency Management and Hudson Fire 12 USR Permitting Schedule CURETh '441V MIDSTREAM 2018 Proposed USR Schedule Subject To Change 1st Community Meeting Estimated Approval Jan Feb Mar April May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Application Submittal 0 Completed 7 -Day Completeness Review 28 -Day Referral Period Planning Commission Hearing BOCC Hearing Final Plat Recorded Completed 411i In process K.To be determined OTo be determined O2-4 weeks after BOCC approval 2019 CURETh MIDSTREAM Construction Schedule Proposed Construction Schedule Subject To Change 2018 Estimated USR Approval Start -Up of Front Tiger Compressor Station Jan Feb Mar April May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Permitting Construction Tiger Compressor Station Start Up 0 Feb -July 2018 Jul -Sep 2018 0 Oct -Dec 2018 2019 (MI CURETh '44V MIDSTREAM Public outreach - Communication Channels Cureton will use multiple methods to communicate with you and to provide effective communication with landowners Mail: US Postal Service Project Website 1-800 Number • Email: tiger@curetonmidstrearn.com • Tollfree Phone number: 833- CURETON (833-287-3866) • Project Website: tigercompressorstation.corn Email Platform: Bi- directional 15 OUREThN MIDSTREAM Thank You Questions & Answers What is a compressor station? Compressor stations provide a vital step in natural gas transportation. They are necessary to move the gas through the pipelines. Without compressor stations there would not be enough pressure in the pipe- line to move the gas. Compressor stations do exactly what their name implies, compress gas to change the pressure. Compression allows the gas to travel along the pipeline route maintaining a steady flow. Technicians regularly visit the facility; however, compressor stations are designed as state-of-the-art un- manned facilities. These facilities are operated remotely, have remote shut down capabilities, SCADA (Supervisory control and data acquisition) monitoring and 24/7 365 real time data. What happens in the compressor station? When gas enters a com- pressor station it flows through a separator. Sepa- rators are used to separate solids and liquids before the gas is compressed. Separators protect the compressor equipment from small debris that might be in the product as it flows through. The pro- cess of compression creates heat as a normal part of the process. However, the natural gas must be cooled before it goes back into the pipeline. The cooling system returns the gas to a transportable temperature dur- ing the final step of the process in a compressor station. Once the temperature is reduced, the gas resumes transport via the pipeline which will ultimately be piped to a distribution facility and used by our communities in homes, businesses and schools. How are compressor sta- tions regulated? To build, own and operate a compressor station in Colora- do, an air permit is required through the Colorado Depart- ment of Public Health and En- vironment. The compressor station is also subject to the EPA's Control Technique Guidelines and New Source Performance Standard. The Tiger Compressor station is subject to permitting with Weld County for a Use by Special Re- view permit. The Use by Special Review, or USR, will be required before any construction can begin on the site. CURETONMIaSTREAM www.TigerCompressorStation.com 1 -833 -CU R ET0 N Tiger@CuretonMidstrean.com Weld County Planning Commission Hearin CURETON MIDSTREAM Presentation Outline • Cureton Midstream Introduction • Project Solutions and Benefits • Project Overview • Approval Criteria • Conditions of Approval • Development Standards Presentation Outline L URETON MIDSTREAM • Cureton Midstream Introduction roject Solutions ndBenefits Project Overview • Approval Criteria Conditions of Approval Development Standards CURETON MIDSTREAM Cureton Introduction The Cureton management team has more than 90 years of combined experience in the oil & gas industry. Honeywell UOP CALIBER tihlD$TRE/,M Air:ar‘i M1iNfSTF?l AH ita e &Ili I.-- St ., ti.. nen Car f lrI I WI' inn IS MP ii Williams.iIL* HighPoint IRESOJRCES__ WILDCAT Weld County Headquarters in Keenesburg, Colorado A natural gas gathering and processing infrastructure system, "Midstream System", located in Weld County EXCELLENCE INTEGRITY TRUST CURETON MIDSTREAM Our Commitment to Safety, Environment, and Health Stop arkluthc�rity All employees exercise and Stop contractors Work Authority on Cureton locations to communicate safety are authorized concerns to Total Recordable Incident Rate TPIF�:r In 2017, our employee the TRIR. year was (recordable an industry incident leading 0.0. per 100 workers) for Corporate Safety Strategy Safety is built into corporate performance goals Community Engagement Ongoing neighbor communication for awareness and feedback Integrity Management Plan Cureton will testing utilize cathodic to ensure proper protection, compliance smart of pining, all .ing, safety ultrasonic and systems PS's Process Safety Management Cornpliance with Safety Standards American Society of Mechanical Engineers SETTING THE S TA fW DA R D Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration PHMSA l .. Deparnitemz Ttionspotiollon Pipeline and Hazardous Y of erlols Safety Administration Occupational Safety and Health Administration • A design review of the facility that "what Ifs" different scenarios for all systems CURETON MIDSTREAM Safety - Integrated into the Process: Project Lifecycle Mechanical Design • System is designed for higher pressure than we will operate. Design pressure 1300 psig, operating pressure 850 psig Testing I • • Code requires 5% X-ray on welds. We X -Ray 100% of the welds. • Pressure containing components are tested to 1.5X their design pressure (test pressure 1950 psig) • Monitors thickness of material to determine if corrosion exists before there is a failure • Redundant processors and power supplies, battery back-up allows for safe system shutdown on loss of power or component failure. CURETON MIDSTREAM Safety - Integrated into the Process: Project Lifecycle (Continued) • Provide overpressure protection for piping and vessels in the facility Remote location that allows the controlled venting and combustion of gas troll) our atmospheric tank system valves. • Automatic isolation valves that shut in facility on loss of power or automatic shutdown Qualified Operators • Hire qualified operators that have initial and ongoingtraining. OSHA compliance, PSM l compliance Standard Operating Procedures J • Cover all scenarios in the facility for start-up, shut -down, and emergency situations • CURETON MIDSTREAM Our Commitment to Environmental Quality Water lualit • Considerations — Groundwater Stormwater • Cureton safeguards In place Integrity management Best management practices Engineered drainage and grading plan — Stormwater management plan and permit — Above -ground piping — Closed drain systems — Secondary containment Air sualit • Considerations Potential pollutants Emissions • Cureton safeguards in place - Air permit - Fugitive emissions program — Closed looped systems for gas and liquids Product is transported via pipeline reducing volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) and CO2 The Tiger Compressor Station is regulated by multiple local, state and federal agencies COLORADO Department of Public Health & Environment 9 Code Compliance - Highly Regulated Industry CURETON MIDSTREAM • Applicable Construction Codes Cureton Com lianoe Pressure Vessels American Society of Mechanical Engineers VIII, Division I. Heat Exchangers American Society of Mechanical Engineers VIII, Division I & TEMA C '7 Welding and Brazing American Society of Mechanical Engineers IX sf Non -Destructive Examination American Society of Mechanical Engineers V v Electrical American Petroleum Institute RP500 A; NEC V Piping & Components Pipe: Valves: Fitti American Society of American Society of n s: American Society of Mechanical Mechanical Mechanical Engineers B31.3 Engineers B16.10 Engineers B16.34 ' Relief Valves American Petroleum Institute RP 520/521 Burner Management National Fire Protection Agency 87 ' Centrifugal Pumps American National Standards Institute, API -610 0' Structural Design International Building Code w/State Amendments American Society of Civil Engineers 7-10 -Wind American Society of Civil Engineers Exposure 7-10, V=120 C MPH, Category III, -Seismic American SDC=Site Society Specific Equipment Foundation Seismic of Civil Engineers 7-10, Site D, Ie=1.25, Seismic Design: Ss=100%, S1=40% Design: Ss / 51= Site Specific Structural Steel American Institute of Steel Construction -2010 Steel Construction Manual #14 Structural Welding American Welding Society D1.1 Foundations American Concrete Institute 318-14 Applicable Operating Codes Cureton Compliance Safety Pipeline Administration and Hazardous of Transportation Material i Department V - Natural Gas 49 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 192 NT - Natural Gas Liquids 49 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 195 Facility - Process Safety Management 29 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 1910.119 Occupational Safety and Administration Health 29 Code of Federal Regulations, Sections 1903 and 1904 V Environmental Protection Agency EPA 40 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 60, Subpart 0000, Part 112 10 Community Involvement Dec'? curio -ton m itdstrerxx,n 7;444/, Ica pio, fry pity a/t ith e 5044A .9431 Weld Coc441141 Falie T"rec2-11), aperec /AT ate loaf sorrpori 0 I 1 oar/ ,otc VIP t:e .5* p%111 °Ott ar evict F 1441°01 support of ; javelfi rn nri- re) y oi:// (Dspt��'c�r rie�r-�ye 4-h� s esnaglitS egr into LigerierliPie•r etirrirrii ¶BRILOHF FUTURES Weld County Sch BELIEVE. ACHIEVE. SUCCEED Weld Food Bank Southeast Weld County Chamber of Commerce Bright Futures Colorado Weld RE -3J Weld Food Bank CURETON MIDSTREAM Southeai sil Weld County , pair and Rodeo Active member and current "Business of the Month" Working with Ms. Tallent on developing a plan that fits Cureton (STEM & Vocational) Working with RE -3J on sponsoring STEM and vocational training at Weld Central Team volunteer actual time 11 L URETON MIDSTREAM Presentation Outline I • Cure idstream 1troduction • Project Solutions and Benefits • Project Overvie • Approval Criteria • Conditions of Approval • Development Standards CURETON MIDSTREAM Midstream Challenges - Large Footprint WELL p WELL O WELL O WELL O WELL O WELL O WELL 0 WELL O PAD !n Ida■na aa,uni. 4OM1`RESSION' I WELL 'i�urrl L. WELL WELL O WELL Ch WELL WELL WELL PAD COMPRESSION PAD COMPRESSION PAD COMPRESSION PROCESSING PLANT RESIDUE 13 Midstream Solution - Reduced Footprint CURETON 1s7 MIDSTREAM WELL s — WELL WELL L� WELL O I WELL O WELL. CSI WELL WELL WELL O WELL 0 WELL O WELL. O WELL WELL � W C 1 1 ! t 1 _ COMPRESSOR STATION PROCESSING PLANT RESIDUE MGL 14 Project Solutions CURETON MIDSTREAM Annual Flared Mcf/ Year in Weld County 10, 000, 000 99000,000 8,000,000 77000.000 6,000,000 5,000,000 4,000,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 5,903,535 7,693,850 2014 7,693,093 2015 8,949,221 2016 2017 8.9 Billion cubic feet "Bcf" of gas was flared in Weld County in 2017 - $54 million in value - Enough to heat 45,000 homes annually COGCC: "More producers seeking flare allowances due to processing and pipeline constraints" Source: Chart data supplied from COGCC website 2-15-2017 15 Centralized Compression Oil & Gas Production in the vicinity of the proposed Tiger Compression Station and the approved Front Range Facility Legend Well (API Spot) Pending Well (Form 2) Permit �.� Approved Weil (Form 2) Permit Pending Location (Form 2A) Permit Approved Location (Form 2A) Permit Di ectinnalellberes 5Front Range Facility fTiger'W Compressor Station s S. • • • S mar • 0 I ithehrter - ' . • • a..* • S s 4,41**i 32 es 5• • si• • .� • # is • • .4** i • • 6 . • • •• • 6 • us II 20 . • el•. •. • • . 1S63VV • S • a I 4 1 a I Source: COGCC 4, 2018 Presentation Outline L URETON MIDSTREAM • Cureton Midstream Introduction • Project Solutions and Benefits • Project Overview • Approval Criteria • Conditions of Approval • Development Standards CURETON MIDSTREAM Project Overview: USRI8-0022 Project Overview • Tiger Compressor Station 40 MMSCFD/d Compress Natural Gas from area production wells to transport to the Front Range Gas Plant (USR17- 0065) for processing and sales to local and national markets Facility Operations Overview • 18 full time local jobs created in Weld County • Tiger Compressor and Front Range Gas Plant 3-D Mode/ Rendering of the Proposed Facility. Proposed sound wall is shown for reference. Na other mitigation is depicted on the rendering 18 CURETON MIDSTREAM Cureton Gathering System .n ,_�� Pi x s 'C:CTtisPERJI PATIPEPPIK 5!4L 0 JE FEY! Al& 19 Site Selection CURETON MIDSTREAM Customer Service - Located near drilling and production activity Engineering - Hydraulically provides a location that optimizes the centralized compression Compressor Station Siting I Parameters Safety - Located in an area that allows Cureton to operate safely and efficiently L Operationally - Located near existing Cureton infrastructure 20 Vicinity Map: Surrounding Land Uses CURETON MIDSTREAM • 1 r Project Site CURETON MIDSTREAM Nt I1 r P IL' a F. 4 Proposed Tiger Compressor Station U R 1 -002 2 FUTURE WELL PAD DEVELOPMENT (Approved WOG LA) 0iN 64W •4 V _ 100 Year A i i J X EXISTING =MP&I"CI Th11s L-II�I4..+LLl�'W1�. INLET RECEIVERS TRANSFORMER MCC BUILDING INSTRUMENT AIR SKID S UG CATCHER FUTURE 3 -PHASE SEPARATOR x X I74 CHAIN LINK .SFCI 1P1rif i• a 5 v w\ a • a FENCE ■i DEHYDRATION $KILL$ FUTURE DEHYDRATION SKIDS COMBUSTOR —let 7 n _ x LEASE BOUNDARY X EXISTING DI RT ROAD PLANT ACCESS ROAD x HALF S ECTI0 N LINE FUTURE COMPRESSORS /7? AND COOLERS APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF SOUND WALL (BY OTHERS) DRAIN TANKS COMPRESSOR AND COOLER N OUTLET LAUNCHER DETENTION POND a as CURETON MIDSTREAM Site Plan 23 Routes CURETON MIDSTREAM Haul Route • WCR 49 • WCR 8 Daily Traffic Generation • Operations • 1 truck • 2-3 Passenger Vehicles • Construction • 10-15 Passenger Vehicles • 2-3 Truck 4 WCR 49 1 SH CURETON MIDSTREAM Site - Specific Safety Systems Mechanical Operations PRIMARY LAYER OF SAFETY SYSTEMS 0 Automated system provides first layer of safety measure. Multiple variables monitored such as pressure, level, flow, and temperature Predetermined inputs for alarm and shutdown of facility. Cause and Effect chart governs setpoints and response. Fire Detection with UV/IR sensors that can detect ultraviolet or infrared light and automatically shut down the facility and isolate fuel sources in an emergency i SECONDARY LAYER OF SAFETY SYSTEMS Manual system provides a redundant safety system Manual push buttons located throughout the facility that could shutdown entire facility in emergency Flare system providing for controlled release and combustion for maintenance and overpressure conditions Air emission control eliminates venting of flammable vapors to atmosphere State-of-the-art mechanical safety systems supported by backup operational systems designed to provide safe facility operations 24/7 25 Outreach CURETON MIDSTREAM Application Submittal: March 7; Continuous correspondence with County Staff throughout Weld County Referral Process and Notice: March 23 Hudson FPD Meetings: March 13 Invitation to Open House Mailed: March 16 Neighborhood Open House: April 5 March April May Mineral Owner Notice: June 15 Hudson FPD Meeting: July 13 Weld OEM Meeting: July 16 June 81 Individual Neighbor Calls, Email, Mailings & Meetings March 16 through July 6 Public Outreach - Communication Channels CURETON MIDSTREAM Cureton will utilize multiple methods to provide effective communication with landowners Mail: US Postal Service Project Website 1-800 Number Email Platform: Bi- directional • Email: tiger@curetonmidstream.com. • Tollfree Phone number: 833- CURETON (833-287-3866) • Project Website: tigercompressorstation.com Facility Enhancements in response to Input CURETON MIDSTREAM • • • S • Noise mitigation study completed Comparative facility example letter Light from surrounding property minimized Facility mitigation • Low profile tanks • Equipment specific noise minimization Visual Mitigation ra) EURETON_ is • 1 a E 4- i ->sfro` . _ - /I • - Z. sir wrt ai a -Taw L ssca • a ►. T' - ` - c ar - ''41.S� - B! • A• sk - I a— L. a - s ahL OSP F f i is --15 '4rife a r _ r _ a. 4iminratire-ge:45, 10•• cr_ z d _a -as Sc 3S a' r -f i a a add EXISTING r y t a Sit 246116 0 �r • • • a - s .s a ell"! rg - - r a -! -larajiteat. Or- .tiatsc t a a s .- •P. - �Y L - '2taa'ss_ -tom:• _ C 44, a: %. -_ s -,_J _ _ asp - I - —'Z _ -�._.._ -,IF — --1 '1 a a t !a_ Pt TT ft t -s y`�-. -r z _ a c TIGER COMPRESSOR STATION ,I LOCATION 5 NORMS DESIGN MentilLindraps 30 CURETON MIDSTREAM jot- • s Sues z - s arc a *EA r.aaa•ras- ti - s . a sa it +aa s. , z p , '' it 1402-1116 a ae S aCiag r a • a -I 1 i r 4 a • Y r a rStar as nt--- — f s at - 9- a. a �-w.,....<1..3 "T —ass - e1.. a r A.. APILS:itigfili. a a�• z • • TIGER COMPRESSOR STATION I LOCATION S PROPOSED i NOF IS DESIGN incrgRarvaiirmpoare 'Q • qtr .y rtes . ' ,p,.,. _ _ r. - _ _ Wi t. ,�: -�I _ �r'F..{ �; .. . } 'a.., z-- r✓ ▪ - �- �"i - • _�0.. • Est'_ f s 'ff .._�, ▪ ' --3 T - i _ T� - i - i� ,r•- t T. �i _ eta 1��,•,� ' µT tj �' ..�� _ mot sl'$ •. s --a:-.e `: - Wit' Behrens and Associates, Inc. 9ww rc.n tmta! .iVonce Control l Figure 4-2 Noise Sensitive Receptor Locations OM) Tiger Compressor Station Facility Noise Modeling C Behrens and Associates, Inc. /Pv i'jp'r;n yenta/ 1\ ofie ( 'nnn in )" Figure 4-5 Scenario 2 Noise Contour Map (dBA) Average Noise LCVCI, LCy ULSfl w� a moVESI maw IMP a 30.0 35_O 40.0 45M UMM 55.0 60.0 65,0 70.0 75.0 80.0 85.0 90.0 400 800 1200 1800 feet Tiger Compressor Station Facility Noise Modeling • ._. Presentation Outline CURETON MIDSTREAM Cureton Midstream Introduction Project Solutions and Benefits Project Overview • Approval Criteria • Conditions of Approval • Development Standards Intent of Ag Zone District CURETON MIDSTREAM Section 23-2-200 Intent • Uses by Special Review • Performance, Design and operation Standards Sec. 23-3-40.A.2 - Uses by special review. The following BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES and USES may be constructed, occupied, operated and maintained in the A (Agricultural) Zone District upon approval of a permit in accordance with the requirements and procedures set forth in Article II, Division 4 of this Chapter. A. Mineral resource development facilities including: 2. AIL ARIA GAS SUPPORT AND SERVICE Intent of Ag Zone District CURETON MIDSTREAM OIL AND SAS SUPPORT A1VD SERVICE Location and operation bases for businesses whose primary activity includes the fallowing kinds of USES: g. Oil and gas processing facilities and related equipment, including, but not limited to, compressors associated with gas processing or which compress gas to enter a pipeline for transport to market. 39 CURETON MIDSTREAM Conformance with Application Requirements Section 23-2-260 General Applicant Information Certified SPO List Mineral Affidavit and Notice Signage Certificate of Conveyances Project Description USR Mapping Products Subdivision Exemption naN f -.� Approval Criteria CURETON MIDSTREAM Section 23-2-220 I. Consistent with the Comprehensive Plan 2. Consistent with the Agricultural Zone District 3. Compatible with the existing surrounding land uses 4. Compatible with future development of the area permitted through the AG Zone and Master Plans of surrounding communities 5. Compatibility with Overlay Districts 6. Preservation of Prime Farmland 7. That there is adequate provision for the protection of the health, safety and welfare of the inhabitants of the NEIGHBORHOOD Presentation Outline L URETON MIDSTREAM • Cureton Midstream Introduction • Project Solutions and Benefits • Project Overview • Approval CriteaAL • Conditions of Approval frveIopmentt ndards i Conditions of Approval CURETON MIDSTREAM • • • • • • • • • • • • Road Maintenance & Improvements Agreement Final Drainage Report Recorded Access Easement Decommissioning Plan Emergency Communications Plan Lighting Plan Landscape/Screening Plan Noise Abatement Plan Recordingtimeline and methodology Facility Action Plan Grading Permit Building Permit processing • Cureton Midstream Introduction • Project Solutions and Benefits • Project Overview • Approval Criteria • Conditions of(\pproval �� Hello