The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20183004.tiffChloe Rempel From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Michael McCormick <mmccormick@montgomerylittle.com> Monday, September 17, 2018 3:37 PM Bob Choate Chloe Rempel; Esther Gesick UPRR RR Crossing WCR 2.5 (Docket # 2018-113) - letter dated 9/17/2018 2018.09.17 Itr choate CDOT documents.pdf It This email originated from outside of Weld County Government. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Bob: Please see the attached letter. MICHAEL R. MCCORMICK I ATTORNEY 1303-779-2721 EMAIL WEB BIO 5445 DTC PARKWAY, St'rrl: 800, GlulI NwooD Vll.l.A(;I:, CO 80111-3053 This e-mail message and am attachments may contain confidential. legally privileged information intended for the exclusive use of the addressee. They may also contain proprietary information or information that is otherwise protected from disclosure by applicable law including vyithout limitation the attorney -client privilege and the attorney work product doctrine for anyone but the intended recipient. Please do not read. copy. or disseminate the information transmitted unless you are the addressee. If you have received this message in error. please call us (collect) at (303) 773-8100 and ask to speak with the message sender. Also. please delete the message from your system. Thank you. eommuni co,,+.. o nS 9/aui r 8' c� ca.C13C), BOCC, PLACER/cH/Oa./SM) ct/18'/18' 2018-3004 EGO© -7S MONTGOMERY LITTLE & SORAN, PC Attorneys ar Law September 17, 2018 Bob Choate, Esq. 1150 O Street P.O. Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 Sent via electronic mail: bchoate@weldgov.com RE: MICHAEL R. MCCORMICK, ESQ. 303-779-2721 mmccormick@montgomerylittle.com Petition to Vacate Portions of County Roads 2.5 et al. Within Union Pacific Railroad Right of Way Adjacent to U.S. Highway 85, Docket #: 2018-113 Additional Documents for Weld County BOCC Consideration Dear Mr. Choate: Pursuant to Commissioner Conway's request at the hearing this morning, please find attached additional documents for the Commissioners' consideration. According to these documents: • CDOT improperly intends to close the WCR 2.5 railroad crossing without awaiting any ruling from the PUC. See, e.g.. CDOT 000159 and 000290.' • The County and UPRR were amenable to switching crossing locations based upon "public pushback." See CDOT 000298-000301; CDOT 000966. • Significant funding is being provided by CDOT and the County for improving local access and connector roads at other locations, but not for WCR 2.5. See, e.g.. CDOT 000962-000965. Would you please add these documents to the Commissioners' official record for this matter and confirm that Commissioner Sean Conway has received a copy of this letter and the attached documents? Please call or write with any questions or concerns regarding this letter. We appreciate your assistance with this matter. Thank you. The highlighting on the attached documents was added by this office and does not appear on the original documents. Bob Choate, Esq. September 17, 2018 Page 2 of 2 Very truly yours, Montgomery Little & Soran, P.C. 7LCJ Michael R. McCormick cc: Mr. Thomas C. Deline (via e-mail) Chloe Rempel (via e-mail: crempel@weldgov.com) Esther Gesick (via e-mail: egesick@weldgov.com) 2 COLORADO Department of Transportation RADAR ITEM PUC RESPONSE Date: August 10, 2018 To: Lou Keen From: Chad Hall Subject: PUC Response Project: WCR Closures Location: SubAcct: 22370 SITUATION/BACKGROUND This RADAR provides an update to the previous RADAR (July 23, 2018) regarding the PUC process and standing. The project team held a "PUC hearing preparation meeting" on August 8, 2018, during which lawyers from UPRR, Weld County, and CDOT (AG's office) discussed the upcoming hearings and how best to prepare. During the meeting, Weld County indicated that vacate plans for the crossings would have t4 be approved by the BOCC, which we had planned on previously. However, it was suggested tha$ the vacate plans be app[oved.,ngw rather than after PUC approval had been obtain effectively allowing closure Or tri Crossings in the near term. My understanding is that this wad the method used to close 5th Street in Eaton while PUC approval is pending. ASSESSMENT There are several benefits to this option: 1) The crossings we have deemed unsafe will be closed sooner, reducing the potential for crashes in the near term 2) CDOT fulfills our obligation to UPRR for the Group 1 closures 3) Weld County residents still have an opportunity to comment before the BOCC, as notice of the vacate must be provided ten days prior to the meeting 4) Gregg Carson suggested that locals may be more inclined to bring their concerns before the BOCC than the PUC as they will be in Weld County rather than traveling to Denver There are also potential drawbacks/ risks: 1) We must push back the pre -hearing conference (scheduled for August 20) such that we are not pursuing the vacates without the judge's knowledge (medium risk; though this will certainly impact the schedule, the potential payoff of earlier closure has been approved by UPRR) 2) Though this is a step that must eventually be taken, it may seem that we (especially Weld County) are trying to skirt the PUC process (medium risk; it will likely come up but it could be argued that Weld is just trying to make the system safer) West Greeley 110601 W 10th Street, Greeley, CO 80634 www.coloradodot.Info CDOT 000158 3) Should the administrative law judge feel we are trying to dodge the process, it may delay the process or even result in a negative ruling (minor risk; this seems unlikely as we are arguing on the basis of safety improvements) 4) I do not know what the political implications will be of this move; it seems that the Commissioners will have to make a potentially unpopular decision, and the certainty of them doing so is certainly questionable, but their vote to submit the closures to the PUC seems to imply consent already RECOMMENDATION This is obviously a decision that Weld County make. I think it would be prudent to run this by Johnny ASAP. If it were up to me, I would -suggest that we move forward with the vacate approval prior to PUC approval for the following reasons: 1) We are increasing safety in the corridor sooner rather than later 2) Per Gregg Carson, UP has agreed to the schedule shift 3) This is a step that must be taken eventually anyway 4) The public will stilt have an opportunity to comment 5) This has the potential to drastically speed up our schedule West Greeley 110601 W 10th Street, Greeley, CO 80634 www.coloradodot.Info 6' w 187t, CDOT 000159 1 COLORADO Department of Transportation Region 4 PUC HEARING PREPARATION MEETING MINUTES Date: 8/8/2018, 10:00-11:30 Location: Big Thompson Conference Room, CDOT Greeley HQ and Conference Call Call: 781-448-4696, PIN: 97970 Project: 22370 ATTENDEES Participant i _ Organization Email Alex Pulley FHU alex.pulley@fhueng.Fom Bruce Barker* Weld County bbarker@weldgov.com Chad Hall CDOT chad.hall@state.co.us _ ' Curtis Hall Weld County Maintenance chall@weldgov.com Elizabeth Relford Weld County erelford@weldgov.com Gregg Carson AG Office flregg.carson@coag.gov Gregg Larsen* UPRR - Real Estate larsen@up.com Josephine Jordan* UPRR rdanl@up.com a Kat Duitsman FHU Katharine.Dultshnan@fhueng.com Lauriel Nelson* UPRR Iinelson@up.com Leo Milan AG Office Ieo.milan@coag.gov Lou Keen CDOT Iouis.keen@state.co.us Rob Martindale CDOT - Ra (road rob.martindale@state.co.us Sara Armfield COOT- Admin savia.armfield@state.co.us Scott Hoftie`'itr CDOT - Railroad scott.hoftiezer@state.co.us Steph Anzia FHU Stephanie.Anzia@fhueng.com *Attended via phone MEETING OBJECTIVES The primary meeting objective was to prepare for the PUC hearings. AGENDA Meeting agenda is attached. MEETING NOTES • All of the Group 1 closures but WCR 29 are going to a hearing • Part of the PUC decision on WCR 29 was that the crossing cannot be complete until rail crossing improvements at WCR 34 are finalized CDOT 000288 •--Rob received information regarding the hearing schedule on 8/7/2018 • WCRs 72 and 104 will be presided over by the same Administrative Law Judge (ALJ)2 but ruled on separately. • There will be a pre -hearing conference for 72 and 104 on August 20 at 1:00 in Denver, the purpose of which will be to schedule hearing dates and submittal deadlines • DECISION: Lawyers from UPRR (private firm), CDOT (Gregg Carson), and Weld (Bruce Barker) will attend the pre -conference hearing • WCRs 35/46 and 2.5 will be presided over by a different judge; dates for these closures have yet to be determined • There continue to be updates to the PUC dockets after the deadline. FHU will continue to check for updates. • We will need a subject matter expert from each of the entities; tentatively, CDOT's representative will be Rob Martindale, Weld's will be Elizabeth Relford and/or Don Dunker, and UPRR's will be Lance Kippen • We want to illustrate the difference in emergency response and school busing based on the before and after closure situations • Need to interview emergency responders (fire, police, and ambulance) and school bus services where applicable to get feedback on re routes 4414 -estimated added timeimpacts • ACTION: FHU will prepare exhibits illustrating the location of emergency response facilities and residents/businesses impacted by the closure after information is provided by emergency responders/school districts • Single contact for ambulance services throughout the corridor • ACTION: Elizabeth will compile list of contacts for other services • ACTION: Steph (FHU) and Chad will contact emergency response personnel to determine alternative routes and potential delays • Need to review public meeting sign -in sheets to determine if business owners with new locations were aware of the potential road closure prior to permitting • ACTION: FHU and Elizabeth will compile public meeting sign in sheets for PEL and closures meetings • We want to illu 5trate the improvements to adjacent intersections intended to improve alternative routes • We will consider the worst case scenario when looking at detours, rather than addressing individual PUC responses; it's possible that the judge wilt allow public comments prior to the hearing and additional people may show up. A public meeting could also be required as part of the PUC process • Present timelines for each closure, specifically as it relates to supplemental improvements (for example, when 44/85 will be complete) • ACTION: Kat will pull pertinent items from schedules already prepared for the LF0rm*ned: Font: Bold I closures project CDOT 000289 • Weld's board of county commissioners (BOCC) will need to vote to approve the vacate plans at each of the crossings; originally we anticipated that they would do so following the PUC approval of the closure, but it's possible that they may be able to do so before Weld County to pursue when to put before BOCC. • There will be a public comment period for the vacate approval, which may be a more comfortable venue for local residents/business owners than the PUC hearing (in Denver); the vacate vote requires notification 10 days prior to the BOCC meeting • Should the vacate plans be approved by the BOCC, Weld County can remove the approach surfaces and install barriers preventing public access over the rails, effectively closing the crossing; this could occur within days of the approval as it takes only a resolution • If the closure is effectively closed, the PUC ruling should be more straightforward • Commissioner Kirkmeyer has requested that the IGA between Weld and CDOT be in place before the vacate hearing • Weld has requested that Johnny present CDOT's --ides position at the BOCC meeting; Johnny and Commissioner Kirkmeyer have talked about this previously (?) • ACTION: Elizabeth will talk to Bruce Barker about the vacate plans • DECISION: Elizabeth will bring the vacate plans for Group 1 closures before the BOCC for approval DECISION ITEMS (1) Weld will request approval from BOCC for vacate plans prior to PUC hearings (2) Lawyers from Weld, CDOT, and UPRR will attend the pre -hearing conference on August 20 (UPDATE 8/9/2018: conference may be moved back by a month or so) ACTION ITEMS (1) Provide the summary spreadsheet to Elizabeth (Chad) (complete 8/9/2018) (2) Prepare exhibits showing emergency responder locations and detour routes (FHU) (3) Prepare and distribute invite list for PUC hearing_ team (Chad) (complete - included below) (4) Prepare comparison spreadsheet with ACP/PEL recommendations (Alex) (5) Compile sign in sheets from PEL and closure meetings (Elizabeth/Alex) (6) Contact emergency response personnel to determine alternative routes and potential delays (Steph/Chad) (7) Pull pertinent items from schedules already prepared for the closures project (Kat) (8) Elizabeth will discuss vacate plans and BOCC meeting with Bruce Barker (Elizabeth) Comment IK1l: Not sure this is true? Maybe state the crossing would be a private crossing which would change the PUC process. CDOT 000290 PUC Team Contact List Participant Organization Email Alex Pulley FHU alex.pulley@fhueng.com Bruce Barker Weld County bbarker@weldgov.com Chad Hall CDOT chad.hall@state.co.us Curtis Hall Weld County Maintenance chall@weldgov.com Elizabeth Relford Weld County erelford@weldgov.com Gregg Carson AG Office gregg.carson@coag.gov Gregg Larsen UPRR - Real Estate galarsen@up.com UPRR jjordanl@up.com Josephine Jordan Kat Duitsman FHU Katharine.Duitsman@fhuen�m Keith Sheaffer CDOT keith.sheaffer@state.co.us Laurie) Nelson UPRR llnelson@up.com Leo Milan AG Office leo.milan@coag.gov Lou Keen CDOT louis.keen@state.co.us Rob Martindale CDOT - Railroad rob.martindaleestate.co.us Sara Armfield CDOT- Admin sara.armfield@state.co.us CDOT - Railroad scott.hoftiezer@state.co.us Scott Hoftiezer Steph Anzia FHU _ _ Stephanie.Anzia@fhueng.com CDOT 000291 COLORADO Department of Transportation Rector, 4 STATUS REPORT 22370 WCR CLOSURES Date: 4/3/2018 Proj.ct: 22370 - WCR Closures Subject Project update, in lieu of project status meeting INTRODUCTION The purpose of this document is to update the project team on recent progress and upcoming steps for the WCR Closures project. This status report will replace the meeting originally scheduled for the afternoon of 4/3/2018. In addition to the write-up, I attached an updated action log and project schedule. PLEASE REVIEW this document and let me know if you see anything unusual. I would like to be able to shift meetings when they are not absolutely necessary so I can respect everyone's busy schedules but I can only do that if we get feedback on status reports like this. LIST OF CLOSURES o @Weld County indicated that UPRR might be amenable to switching WCR 18.5 and 4 for 'NCR 37 and 78 o Changing these closures would mitigate the substantial public pushback we have received so far on 4 and 18.5 o The public has not yet been informed of the potential closure of 78 and 37 o ACTION: Team to d=scuss the necessity of a public meeting for the closure of 78 and 37 at the next status meeting CLOSURE APPROVAL PROCESSES Approval processes include the PUC application submittal, Access Control Plan modification, Weld County Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) approval, and the Weld County/CDOT IGA(s). PUC Closure Approval o UPRR has expressed interest in breaking up submittals into Group 1 and Group 2 in order to expedite the process o After we have approval for Group 1 ACP amendments (29, 35/46, and 72) we will submit PUC applications o Ideally ACP amendment approval will occur in the next two weeks, bringing our PUC submittal to late April/early May and putting our sign installation in May West Greeley 1 10601 W 10t" Street, Greeley, CO 80634 www.color CDOT 000298 • FHU is in the process of developing PUC applications for 78 and 37 so we are prepared, should these replace other closures ACTION: Submit PUC applications following ACP approval and/or Johnny go-ahead Access Control Plan Modifications Modifications to the US 85 ACP must be approved by a two -third vote of the signatories of the original plan The access control plan must be modified for WCR 18.5, 29, 35/16, 72, 78, and O Street o We have yet to decide if we will present modification proposals together or by Group o Weld has indicated that it may be difficult to get support for these modifications, especially where we are not obligated to implement detour improvements o Currently, the decision on how to approach the ACP modifications is with Johnny o We should get some guidance on this issue in the next week or so o ACTION: Keith will follow up with Johnny regarding method to proceed o ACTION: Tim Bilobran will prepare an approach to presenting these to the US 85 ACP signatories Weld BOCC Closure Approval County road closures are contingent on the commissioners' approval; this was identified as a risk at our last status meeting o At present we are assuming that CDOT/Weld 1GAs will mitigate this risk, though it is likely that there will still be an opposition vote to any closure ACTION: Ensure that the language in the IGA constitutes BOCC approval Weld County/CDOT IGA CDOT developed a draft (GA to finalize the list of closures, identify costs for detour improvements, and identify responsibilities of each party (Weld/CDOT) CDOT met with Weld on March 27, 2018, to discuss the draft IGA Weld County will provide edits to the IGA to CDOT by April 2, 2018 ACTION: Weld County to submit comments on the draft iGA ACTION: CDOT to incorporate the comments and submit to AG office for review The result of the additional review and submittal will still be a draft IGA CDOT will prepare a final IGA with Weld following approval of closures list by UPRR (like&y be either 18 5 or 37,E PHASE 1 PLANS 0 0 0 0 0 Held FIR/FOR meeting March 19, 2018 Received good feedback from the project team FHU developed a comment matrix and has addressed the changes in the plan sets We will develop a final set of plans to be complete by DATE Final plan sets will be packaged individually by closure We will discuss construction at our next status meetinemeeting, so we are prepared when we receive PUC approval when it happens West Greeley 1 10601 W 10th Street, Greeley, CO 80634 www.color i Comment (HCll: Alex, is this right? Comment [A21 Yes, as I recall Comment [AM No ACP amendment needed for 31 and 78 Comment IHC4(: Alex/Kat when wilt Phase 1 plans be complete? Comment (K51: Group 1 plans can be finalized two weeks after a decision on which closures to include (maybe sooner if no additions). Would like to wait to finalize for final RR approval until we get ROW survey. CDOT 000299 o FHU will develop FIR/FOR plans for WCR 78 and 37 in case we trade those for 4 and 185 o Need to get survey data to determine railroad ROW waiting on flagging o ACTION Chad will include Phase 1, Group 1 construction in our next status meeting o ACTION. FHU to develop FIR/FOR plans for WCR 78 and 37 o ACTION Get RR flagger scheduled for surveying DETOUR IMPROVEMENTS (GROUP 2) o FHU developed conceptual designs and cost estimates for detour improvements at 4, 18 5, 30, 0 Street, 37/78, and 100 r; o CDOT contnbution for detour improvements', 5 has been capped at $6M, although additional funding might become available through Section 130 o Excepting the potential "Michigan U" identified as a detour improvement for the 0 Street closure, all detour improvements will be built by Weld County using state only money from CDOT ' r o ACTION FHU will develop a more detailed estimate and layout for the Michigan U turn suggested as a detour improvement for'O,Street , M PHASE 2 ,a o We have not yet started on plans%cost estimates for Plisse 2 improvements o As we've discussed, `Phase 2 construction will generallysoccur in conjunction with other projects on U585, as such the schedule for these improvements is not yet known o For funding and planning purposes, if'will'be necessary to begin considenng Phase 2 costs , K MISCELLANEOUS s ';� !��,� 4d o 'ACTION. FHU will update the project schedule to reflect our new situation o Our next status meeting will be held Apnl 19, 2018, 2 00 4'00 at Greeley HQ o ACTIONcichad to set up14/19 status meeting and distribute invitation o We may need to hold a public meeting for the closure of WCR78 and 37, should these be traded for.4 and 18 5;;this will be determined following agreement of updated list of closures ACTION ITEMS The following action items have been added to the action log (attached) (1) Team to discuss the necessity of a public meeting for the closure of 78 and 37 at the next status meeting (2) Submit PUC applications following ACP approval and/or Johnny go-ahead (3) Keith will follow up with Johnny regarding method to proceed (4) Tim Bilobran will prepare an approach to presenting these to the US 85 ACP signatories (5) Weld/CDOT will ensure that the language in the IGA constitutes BOCC approval West Greeley 110601 W 10th Street, Greeley, CO 80634 www color CDOT 000300 (6) Elizabeth/Don to submit comments on the draft IGA (7) Chad/Keith to incorporate the comments and submit to AG office for review (8) Chad will include Phase 1, Group 1 construction in our next status meeting (9) Kat (FHU) to develop FIR/FOR plans for WCR 78 and 37 (10) Lance will get RR flagger scheduled for surveying (11) Kat (FHU) will develop a more detailed estimate and layout for the Michigan U turn suggested as a detour improvement for O Street (12) Alex (FHU) will update the project schedule to reflect our new situation (13) Chad to set up 4/19 status meeting and distnbute Invitation ATTACHMENTS. (1) Updated action log (2) Updated project schedule (3) FIR/FOR comment matnx West Greeley 110601 W 10' Street, Greeley, CO 80634 www color CDOT 000301 COLORADO Department of Transportation Region 4 WCRs 2.5 AND 4 MEETING SUMMARY Date: 5/24/2018, 9:00-10:30 Location: Brighton City Hall, 500 South 4th Avenue, Brighton, CO Subject: Closure of WCR 2.5 and WCR 4 ATTENDEES Participant Organization - Email Alisha Janes Brighton ajanes@brightonco.gov Andy Stratton CDOT andrew.stratton@state.co.us Barbara Kirkmeyer Weld County bkirkmeyer@weldgov.com Chad Hall CDOT chad.hall@state.co.us Elizabeth Relford Weld County erelford@weldgov.com Johnny Olson CDOT j.olson@state.co.us Keith Sheaffer CDOT keith.sheaffer@state.co.us Kurt Kionka CDOT kurt.kionka@state.co.us Mary Falconburg Brighton , mfalconburg@brightonco.gov Paul Jesaitis CDOT paul.jesaitis@state.co.us Philip Rodriguez Brighton prodriguez@brightonco.gov MEETING OBJECTIVES (1) Discuss WCR 2.5 Status (2) Discuss WCR 4 Closure MEETING AGENDA Meeting agenda is attached. MEETING NOTES WCR 2.5 CDOT o PUC application for the closure of WCR 2.5 was submitted May 18, 2018 o Necessary two-thirds vote to allow ACP amendment was obtained on May 24, 2018 o CDOT anticipates closure of WCR 2.5 in July 2018 WCR 4 Brighton o Brighton has received pushback from Brighton Fire and Vestas regarding the closure Vestas worked with Brighton Fire District to dedicate land for a new fire station on WCR4 Brighton's tong term plans include improvements to WCR 2 and US 85, CDOT made it clear that this objective has not been discussed within the Organization and has not been dedicated any funding at this time. It was suggested that the City begin working with the DRCOG to submit this as a potential project to be approved. CDOT 000521 Weld Brighton is not anticipating an interchange at WCR 2 and US 85 in the near future but would like to see intersection improvements in the next 10 years o Brighton has ROW reserved on the west side of WCR 2/US85 o Love's truck stop has committed to improvements on the SW corner of U585/WCR 2, both on the highway and on the county road o Master plan identifies WCR 2 as a major arterial, includes development of WCR 27 and adjustment of WCR 4 access to RI/RO o Local access improvements must be in place prior to the closure of WCR 4; CDOT stated that this issue should be evaluated by the City due to the fact that the UPRR may automatically close this access by stopping trains within the intersection, which would be outside any control of CDOTs Brighton has considered extension of 11th north to WCR 2.5; CDOT stated th4L_this should be the responsibility of the City's to ensure an alternate North/South-Mute other than US 85. o Would like to work with Weld and CDOT to develop a connector from WCR 2 to WCR 4; the City does not currently have funding to build this road; CDOT stated that this is a potential responsibility of the City. o Concerned with maintaining access to WCR 2 o Previous discussion with UPRR indicated that UP was considering building a siding along WCR 27, which would affect connectivity at WCR 4 and could close WCR 27 entirely; timeline for this improvement is not known o UP has stressed the importance of a siding between WCR 2 and 6 for operations in Denver; they have expressed interest in working with communities but have been clear that they can close roads with their trains whenever it is operationally beneficial CDOT Weld does not have the resources to fund a connecter road between WCRs 2 and 4 O UPRR may be amenable to building a siding north or south of 120th but either 112th or 124th would need to be closed Suggest that Brighton discuss potential closure of 124th with Adams County and Commerce City to preclude a siding between WCRs 2 and 6 o CDOT discussed blockage of WCRs 2 and 6 with UPRR; UPRR indicated that WCR4 would need to be closed to allow train storage and minimize blockage at adjacent intersections o Previous discussions with Vestas indicated that WCR 6 was the planned access point o Funding for improvements at the intersection of WCR 2 and US85 has not been identified o If WCR 4 is closed, improvements at WCR 2 and US85 increase in priority o CDOT cannot move forward to identify funding until preliminary designs and cost estimates are available O Improvements to WCR 2/ US85 without widening of 168th will not alleviate congestion at the intersection; intersection improvements at WCR 27/US85 and widening of WCR 2 (both east and west of US85) are necessary o CDOT does not have funding to work on widening and off -system intersections, or is it in their jurisdiction to improve; improvements along 168th and at adjacent intersections will rely on alternative funding, by developers and/or the City o Group understands that CDOT has no control over UPRR operations; UP may choose to block any of the through streets at any time o CDOT agreed to discuss delay in closure of WCR 4 with UPRR o Of primary concern at present is informing the public that WCRs 2, 4, and 6 may all be affected if this project does not proceed CDOT 000522 o CDOT and Weld will need to identify alternative closures to include in the ROW settlement agreement as UPRR will not agree to a five year plan o CDOT will need to have an agreement in place that obligates Brighton to make improvements to 168th to accommodate increased traffic volumes o 124th at US85 is a state highway (SH22) for a short segment, this was suggested that devolution should occur so that the City gains control of this portion of roadway ACTION ITEMS 1) Brighton will prepare 30 percent design for WCR 2/US85 intersection improvements, widening of 168th, and improvements at WCR 27/168th intersection 2) Brighton to talk to Commerce City and Adams County about closing 124th, will include Region 1 CDOT staff in conversation - 3) Bnghton will begin considering parallel improvements to extend 11th up to WCR 4 4) CDOT will assist with plan review r 5) After preliminary designs are complete and cost estimates are available, CDOT will begin pursuing funding 6) Weld will look for additional closures td replace WCR 4 in the ROW Settlement Agreement - n CDOT 000523 U585 CDOT/UPRR_ROW Agreement FACT SHEETS WCR Closures, Project 0853-108 (22370) April 30, 2018 Project Overview CLOSURES At present, Group 1 closures include WCR 104, 72, 35/46, 29, and 2.5. The closures that require detour improvements are classified as Group 2, and include WCR 100, O Street, WCR 33, 30, 18.5, and 4. In recent discussions with Weld County, they suggested that the closure of WCR 78 and 37 will replace 4 and 18.5, though UPRR has not yet approved these changes and Weld County indicated the need for further discussion. SCHEDULE Upcoming tasks include finalization of the IGA with Weld, submittal of PUC applications, approval of closures through the Weld BOCC, and approval of ACP amendments for 29, 35/46, O Street, 72, and 18.5 if it is retained. Group 1 PUC submittal will take place following finalization of the IGA and approval from the Board of County Commissioners. Assuming minimal public pushback, closures will begin early summer 2018. Group 2 closures will likely begin late summer 2018, and may extend out to 2019 based on the required detour improvements. BUDGET Initial cost estimates indicated that detour improvements will cost more than $13M. Following internal discussion, CDOT's allocation has been capped at $6M. Detour improvements will need to be budgeted accordingly. Per Rob Martindale (CDOT railroad specialist), additional funding (up to $5.4M, with the potential for more based on a March 30, 2018 conference call with Fl -I WA) will be available through Section 130. Where we use Section 130 money, we will need to follow NEPA requirements along with the Federal Section 130 regulations. IGA CDOT prepared a draft IGA between CDOT and Weld County to identify detour improvements and quantify funding necessary to close the roads and construct the improvements. Following iterative review by both CDOT and Weld County, an updated 1GA will be ready to submit to the AG's office by May 4, 2018. ISSUES Detour improvements and cost estimates are preliminary, and may change based on feedback from Johnny Olson (Region 4 RTD), Weld County, or UPRR. UPRR has not formally agreed to the amended closures. Some stakeholders have insisted that detour improvements are in place prior to road closure. As some improvements are fairly involved, this could delay the closure schedule. These are Group 2 closures, as defined in the aforementioned section. DRAFT CDOT 000960 Page Intentionally Left Blank DRAFT CDOT 000961 US85 CDOT/UPRR ROW Agreement WCR Closures, Project 0853-108 (22370) WCR 2.5 WCR 2.5 is a gravel road located near Brighton under the jurisdiction of Weld County. The railroad is offset approximately 1,500 feet east of US 85, parallel to and just east of WCR 27 (Main Street, Brighton). There has been little public pushback on this closure, and substantial detour This is a Group 1 closure. improvements are not necessary. The railroad's operational improvements derived from this closure are contingent on the closure of WCR 4. The closure of WCR 2.5 alone will provide safety improvements but not oggational improvements for UPRR. Furthermore, the public benefit to he City of Brighton (fewer train blockages) depends on closure of both roads. Though WCR 4 will likely be excluded from the agreement, its closure will likely occur in upcoming years. SCOPE Phase 1 improvements include installation of barriers and barricades, removal of railroad signage, and installation of detour signage. No work will be necessary on US 85. CDOT will install a stock gate to prevent through traffic between WCR 2 and 2.5 on the private access road adjacent to and east of the railroad, and private access will remain. CDOT and Weld County maintenance personnel will complete all Phase 1 improvements. Phase 2 improvements include a cul-de-sac or hammerhead on the east side of the crossing, which may require ROW acquisition. Weld County will construct Phase 2 improvements. SCHEDULE Phase 1: Completed summer 2018 Phase 2: Estimated completion summer 2019 BUDGET Phase 1: Phase 2: TOTAL: $50,000 $100,000 (conceptual, no plans yet) $ 150,000 DRAFT FACT SHEET April 30, 2018 Proposed County Road Closures WCR 104 WCR 78' WCR 37' WCR 72 WCR 35/46 WCR 33 WCR 30 Peckham Interchange WCR 44/US 85 r N CDOT 000962 US85 CDOT/UPRR ROW Agreement FACT SHEET _ti..ta...e -_a V`' .ws i..t: - - - 'i.rYl r a,s- r a WCR Closures, Project 0853-108 (22370) April 30, 2018 rr. WCR 2.5 (cont.) No. ITEM UNIT UNIT COST QUANTITY r COST COMMENTS WCR 2.5 202-00220 REMOVAL OF ASPHALT WI SY S 30.00 0 S 0.00 202-00250 REMOVAL Of PAvE1aNT AVIRKt GS SF _ S S.00 0 S 0 OO 202-00610 REMOVAL OF GROUND 9(3M EA _ $ 200.0( I S 1.600 00 614-00011 SIGN PANEL (CLASS I) SF S 30.00 11 S 330 00 614.00012 SIGN PULL (CLASS II) SF S 35.00 72 S 2.52000 LF S 20.00 68 do S 1.760 CC 614-00220 STEEL SIGN POST (25 X 23 INCH TLIBUNo) $t4 so312 RARRIcADe (TYPE 3 F 5) EA S 500 OG 2 S 1 000 00 6220-00020 SANITARY FACILITY EA 3 2 500001 I S 2 500 00 Kepi in per FIR -FOR dr9..n -ran 445 te4k0 CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING LS _ $ TO 00000 I S 10000 0C 627.00005 EPDXY PAVEMENT VMRK{H(3 GAL S 200.01 020 ... S 40 (11 6.30-6.033S SARRh AGE (TYPE 3 ti -Ai (TEMPORARY? EA S 200 00 3 $ 600 0n EA $ 50 O(, I I S 5$0 00 a , 630 dolt! CON$TRUCT)8T4 TRAP FIG SIGN (PAIIEt SIZE A) EA S 60 00 3 S ISO 00 630-80342 CONSTR1/2.CT)ON TRAFFIC SIGN (PANEL SIZE 9 t 630-60344 CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC SIGN (SPECIAL) SF $ 30 00 0 S 0 0O 630 80370 CONCRETE BARRIER (TEMPC-RAflr' LF S 50 00 40 $ 2 000 00 700 FiA TRAFFIC CON TWA. 13 S 2.306.00 1 S 2,308 00 10% of bid items 700-70360 PA EROSION CONTROL t 3 S 5 OOC I S 5.000 0O%* ipd to rows, to tons per comewnb TOTAL CONSTRUCTION X1O ITEMS (CBI) 30,388 MISCELLANEOUS COSTS MNOR CONTRACT REVISIONS I 5% -- CB S 1 512 40 EROSION CONTROL / STORIJWATER MGMT 5% OF CBI S 1.519 40 CONTINGENCIES & OTHER COSTS 5% OF CBI S 1 510 40 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION ITEMS (Ct1 32O46 T so,000 No improvements to US 85 Phase 1- Barriers, barricades, removal of pavement, signing by CDOT Phase 2- C ul Ira sac' tklmi►lencerrrl In Weld County DRAFT CDOT 000963 US85 CDOT/UPRR ROW Agreement WCR Closures, Project 0853-108 (22370) FACT SHEET Now April 30, 2018 WCR 4 (New Energy Drive) WCR 4 is a paved road under the jurisdiction of Brighton. \f',Wi CR 4 intersects the railroad east of WCR 27, approximately 2,000 feet east of US 85. There has been substantial negative feedback to this closure. In addition to members of the public, Brighton Fire and Rescue District, the City of Brighton, and Vestas American Wind Technology have requested substantial county road improvements as detour mitigation. Recent meetings with Weld have suggested that WCR 4 (and WCR 18.5) may be replaced by WCR 78 and WCR 37. SCOPE Phase 1 improvements would include installation of barriers and barricades, removal of railroad signage, removal of crossing gates and equipment, removal of asphalt pavement and concrete median, and installation of detour signage. There would be no changes to US 85. Supplemental improvements associated with this closure would likely include a connector road between WCR 2 and WCR 6. Associated work includes ROW acquisition, utility relocations, drainage, and an irrigation canal crossing. The local stakeholders would likely require completion of this supplemental work prior to closure of the crossing. Phase 2 improvements associated with this closure would include a cul- de-sac or hammerhead on the east side of the crossing, for which ROW would be needed. SCHEDULE Phase 1: Completed summer 2019 (if closure is not contingent on detour improvements, closure could occur sooner) Phase 2: Likely combined with Phase 1 improvements, summer 2019 BUDGET Phase 1: Phase 2: TOTAL: $150,000 + $4,100,000 (Connector Rd) $100,000 (conceptual, no plans yet) $4,350,000 DRAFT Proposed County Road Closures WCR 104 WCR 100 WCR 78' WCR 37' WCR 72 0 Street WCR 35/46 WCR 33 WCR 29 WCR 30 WCR 18.5' WCR 4* WCR 2.5' Nunn Ault Eaton Greeley La Salle Peckham Interchange WCR 44/US 85 Platteville Fort Lupton r N CDOT 000964 US85 CDOT/UPRR ROW Agreement FACT SHEET oft- -irrTS:Plr,":=7=rra.s-w-toposassocenviroallirleJNIMIle. _ WCR Closures, Project 0853-108 (22370) April 30, 2018 WCR 4 (New Energy Drive) (cont.) Ron Cosi par rails S340 000 1239 422 'NCR CR ties 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 MCA 4MI r_A+ 142 21 wails t e... S M nSCR 2.rd WCR 3680.000 1471.144 1311,2!8 121 100 14 .000 1340.1761 1200,000 33'10.000 1301 s00 a- .AdC r SW al....ia. 40XL MC W mow WA FVT 3001asatn S) bftdg. fse -• s O an XI nag s 32' .100 C re 16" a 5% 3r ..n.. E A 64 22 S botborn'it4 'ILIA 64 22 SR lop nd T Trail[ C..* 4 Sprang ago pl 4 N..'..Jwev trough vs,Mn . - f. r - w ' 1aM'g a0H ' • 4 • ). 012 312. r0 nip. 4IJM riMocallr6 1150 541 S10 sod 12.400 1340 21 S MO OM 1273 000 13]11 60( /trrtlw cosi ol one 9100 Ir4Xai canal untie spat sub -Tani It n41EIK 12.476,41fI 1430.54C\ 1444.49 __- * gency I I. sa 2117)34 53.422,111 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION ROW anti E n r.'?r"• 121T 1 ii.- •, 34.13 GOO TOTAL PROJECT 14,1.0.000 Ms. ITEM SUIT MOT COST 0UA$TITY COST ICRI i mac I n meat or ay. CAtICA t i 1 nX tM. I LOX •a 10i ACM POJAWAL Or ASPHAI 1 MO _Pt $ *al 1 ni 1 IBO't0 ^ is 1 10-02' a $ 411000 es caws WK Or CIA SeC OJTTEA , YaIMMO PIIIIDVAL Or PSNliaaT liAPPIP4.1. , V I $ a 1 $ a s maM'o Mi]Qrat Or a+4aln LON EA 1 ?0000 I 1 1 INN 1mar SCR nee ocAtsn V $ MX I 1 BUM Pm 1•a Ma PAIS. CLAY MI d 1 L00 43 1 3.234 MP if 1 TUC Ti 1 t S•0 a l a ta4Mtb ITSS 11011 POP Q 6 l 11 OCR ARM i at4t7 r 1 MNMR-•O! (TWO l 1i, LA I Ma 2 1 IOM 1C N•MTA*T . AO ITt CA • 1.144-00 I $ 1 W MM . 1 1 10DOMcu 1 I 'Saes n 4a MIM I GTM III IC1M7o1 slfl war £ nat P tK tDM Yalta GK I 7DO 111 •11 $ MM F ann 0A#Cat14p84t4 t1ldt'•N+}Kaan Mann EA + Moil 2 1 a t14134 1 Cal It*T10$4 f1A1IC MN #1A'El 242 Al LA 1 $0 S+ 14 I 'a 1M mann scpcat Cs Tit M SCM SPAM. ORE Ili EA 1 M1\ 1 I 11'1 n snow X r'•e.r.. nqy TRArVC SIC$ ISM CIA/ SF $ 34SX\ M I Mon 0214413/1 ,YANCArl I ■ANN Al aa11aKIAtY1 t ► i 1 Sr 21 a $ 1 CO110 , s 1 1.171 5, I I 11%1 Sae 110 ca rmrc cscaa 7 S'.1012 ra mown is LS 1 SA7 I 1 SCOS 2% 12l, 01 r�ABS G . K COMrTR:Xn1QN se nut (Cm $JICQ.LANEOVS COSTS 19.01 cacts'ct nn'a≥ 1% OP C II I BOBS n Pt - Of C11 T 1 414.71' Enos tit Coats re YOutosnot uaaR CONTINGENCIES 4 OTHER COSTS :'4 M la 1 ...i1 Lt - 'TOM Cootithietieti Maui (en 1 n031 Phase ?- Cul-de-sarlhammerhead by Weld County Phase 1- Barriers, barricades, removal of pavement and median, signing by COOT No improvements to US 85 WCR 29 Connector Phase I- Road Improvements and ROW by Weld County Phase I- Bridge Improvements by Weld County Phase I - Raid ltnpravesrhe nts by Weld County DRAFT CDOT 000965 US85 CDOT/UPRR ROW Agreement WCR Closures, Project 0853-108 (22370) Aster,- r..emar _ WCR 18.5 (likely removed from consideration) WCR 18.5 is located north of Fort Lupton. The railway crossing is situated approximately 600 feet east of US 85. Negative feedback from Fort Lupton Fire Protection District has led to additional proposed Weld County Road improvements for detour mitigation. Additionally, this closure would require an amendment to the Access Control Plan. At CDOT's March 27, 2018 meeting with Weld County, Commissioner Kirkmeyer indicated that WCR 18.5 would not be closed. SCOPE Phase 1 improvements will include installation of barriers and barricades, removal of railroad signage, and removal of asphalt pavement up to rail tie ends. No work will be done on US 85. Supplemental improvements requested by stakeholders include a connector road between WCR 18.5 and WCR 18. Associated work includes ROW acquisition, utility relocations, and drainage improvements. Phase 2 improvements associated with this closure include a cul-de-sac or hammerhead on both sides of the crossing. ROW will be needed for improvements for cul-de-sac or hammerhead. SCHEDULE Phase 1: Complete by summer 2019 (if closure is not contingent on supplemental improvements in place, closure could occur sooner) Phase 2: Complete by late 2019 BUDGET Phase 1: Phase 2: TOTAL: $50,000 + $1,200,000 (Connector Rd) $200,000 (conceptual, no plans yet) $ 1,450,000 DRAFT FACT SHEET April 30, 2018 Proposed County Rood Closures WCR 104 WCR 100 WCR 78' WCR 37' WCR 72 O Street WCR 35/46 WCR 33 WCR 29 WCR 30 WCR 18.5* WCR 4` - WCR 2.5* Nunn Ault • Eaton Greeley La Salle Peckham Interchange WCR 44/US 85 Platteville Fort Lupton r N CDOT 000966 US85 CDOT/UPRR ROW Agreement WCR Closures, Project 0853-108 (22370) FACT SHEET April 30, 2018 WCR 18.5 (cont'd) (likely removed from consideration) WCR Railroad Closures r*non of or ble Cost FIR/FOR 0315/11 rev O3/2l/11 Mt ITEM lJ1MT COST XAllTTTY seta is s US 4•27) IOW* Or•s+..aToaf Tr 1 >1a YI 1 aired WWI@ 4104.0 11•1taat11 ta•1a4 11 $ 1 It t a 1 a S CI) Ina& 0' an X.00 CA v $ r 1 5 1210M 4444444 ) aa•tl1M1 asae>a4 I ti:. 4 I OS • war s la loall1aA11a v 1 $aa u $ 7J710o •I'SMJ1 fill& SSIO1112IA NM u11f u i 7eai` n I Iwal E• aCr T trial min I F r CA I WI 1 I I goo CO 411.11=3 1M[T•RY Fla Mr F • 1 13COto I I t VII CO U t * MX Ilk 1 1 *XOCO 4Jf•FOI1 C.0101*IX rag Salt *IQ Sal ONO 1J4IT natives lavaaa w I 771. I N 1 I • W MCI nom wenn traits is a 1 M000tr 1 *St b) swami Ian Mel 11►L.Whafl. £4 I meal ) I La ae N7 /Y n/ tva 055+a104 n1r•ai vw5 rave. via V N 1 N a 7 1 lam m aasw OCIPsWS ela•E1:Gnat an m M 1 as I I t IMOD Sall 11 ea norm sancta 64 1 ~ IP I 10 d1 1 a as • oo to Mon a•Mla mane n V 1 via U 1 44 ao Al ACM w MCIPP• Kin ?m , 11 t I ary • 1 • ma an SI MS TOTAL GOMSTRIXTIO 1 •tt MIS RCM IIIICSUM1O113 COSTS A ta.douesactataess CI CD I 2402% E/sxalCOcRi I TC/1M,A TEA WAFT 1% OFCO 1 11Un COKT*OEMC1f! 4 0 nos COS Ts is COIN 1 T 1tT Ts TOTAL COIl*T1 IDGIVIIITEMS 1Gq 6S.] T2 No improvements to US 85 'INCH 185 Phase 2- Cul -de-sad/tunt►Fterheurl In Weld (0urrn• stern C AOC UM martial. $8C 6I ROW Ik a Pit ]00 taut Sr Cass pa aim S340303 S239 in S I S9 644 111100 VIM. 5340 IS WO= = S,2TS DCO US 160X+ CR 27 WCR So OS 05 3 S 05 0 5 0 S D S D S 0 wCR 11-5 hsrorurerits 511.7 uran arta ten VC R111 x1! ?CR1e5 S1 TOCDC 5119,71 PI $S,4X 11WDr $1 TO CM ISOCOC S137,S0C U, CTS 1t 2 5% If sic bC4A11-22Staid= ever 'YJA 6425 SX boo rail T Track r Jr, 1 Sprig Qd Sr prg Mr* nadny Y , <- R9n IFTDmtnit 'rig s t 143cb, Oranagr rc..r t rp rah, Valh reins" .--r 2e eon don ere( map d aoang an 30' tea 137 ode rr *alai cars - ar+de► sore SusTati Catnpcy 15% Si r49 MN S438140 ST11.1411 SI 0(52 SOW at Emmert TOTAL COnST11ucno“ TOTAL PROJECT 12717.1% S21SF ISM{ • SS43`1V Si6*' 11111,10C I WCR 27 5 Connector (could also be located further West pelt PER) DRAFT Phase I- Ram) lnrprot emelt!: and ROW by Weld County. C DOT 000967 US85 CDOT/UPRR ROW Agreement WCR Closures, Project 0853-108 (22370) FACT SHEET April 30, 2018 WCR 30 WCR 30 is a gravel road located in the Town of Platteville. US 85 is situated approximately 70 feet west of the railroad. Platteville has expressed concern regarding this closure, and has requested substantial detour improvements including a virgin roadway alignment between WCR 30 and WCR 32. This is a Group 2 closure. Weld County will likely enter into an IGA with Platteville to transfer detour improvement money to Platteville. Platteville may be willing to allow the road closure prior to construction of the connector road, though this has not been formally approved by Platteville. SCOPE Phase 1 improvements will include installation of barriers and barricades, removal of railroad signage, removal of asphalt pavement, and signing and striping on US 85. Supplemental improvements include a connector road between WCR 30 and WCR 32, as well as asphalt rehabilitation along WCR 30 and WCR 32. Associated work includes ROW acquisition, utility relocations, and drainage improvements. US 85 has left and right turn lanes into WCR 32, so supplemental improvements on US 85 may not be necessary. Phase 2 improvements include a cul-de-sac or hammerhead on the east side of the crossing. ROW needed for improvements for cul-de-sac or hammerhead. US 85 work includes removal of median crossover and reestablishment of median and east drainage ditch. SCHEDULE Phase 1: Construction complete summer 2019 (if closure is not contingent on detour improvements, closure could occur sooner) Phase 2: Late 2019 BUDGET Phase 1: $50,000 + $4,300,000 (Connector Rd) Phase 2: $100,000 (conceptual, no plans yet) TOTAL: $ 4,450,000 DRAFT Proposed County Road Closures WCR 104 WCR 100 Nunn WCR 78* WCR 37' WCR 72 0 Street WCR 35/46 WCR 33 WCR 29 WCR 30 WCR 18.5' WCR 4' - WCR 2.5' Ault Eaton Greeley La Salle Peckhom Interchange WCR 44/US 85 Platteville Fort Lupton r N CDOT 000968 US85 CDOT/UPRR ROW Agreement FACT SHEET WCR Closures, Project 0853-108 (22370) April 30, 2018 a . .-..r_... -:_..•L :: -.,.....,.a.:auY.-n;sJsrccn:c- • - - WCR 30 (cont.) WCR Railroad Closures Opinion of Probable Cost FIR/FOR 03/5/18 rev. 03/27/14 Na ITEM UM War Or QUA1rTTTY COST WCR 311 • 42 CCI20 IafOYK Of A3th*T MAT Iv 1 Ia 2.4 1 MPS R1 2tIa17Y9 WWII 0 /Mtawl uuaia: O $ ►O[, 207 I t Coon 27all r1 Weal CIF GROt1QIKJ1 LA 1 POSIX` 1 ► 1OKI Halal' WI►I.a Witt 11 0< 5 ID a" • S •lq ♦u an S O, PAC aM$ IN Sr 1 no u 1 1 •14Ian StL9 sal p • Z ZS ownTIS$3) tl 1 27� n s tfy IA 3 Im 00 2 1 t so 1u0eir al k aia rein l P ap _1 -err: SWOTIRYIKIWI IA I 2500-00 9 1 2519.00 tJSCl CTs•drKr141UdT,traid U S MAC= I S 000••d GAL EA 1 2O.Ot. • tl I 101111 •T► cos crow. l0 une stew 11!00nS lialliCanktnnr1H-y:T13/CI141J1'i 1 MK I S Mr U I y x/ I $ ma 1t1 ED MAI c1>,sm eel rw It S>01 nowt Salt M EA I A OC I 1 9r10q Its AC cl CO IIIt. COM TRAM MN "AWL eta it O S 1tOc.\ • S 01x1 OOSaN CONS TOLCTtO 17RAIrFt ICS 1VlGLa man cafe, tat r (NW- *sat IJ I 10 Or a3 5 t00• n n0 Fa ntync crormoL u I 2.12iSc I S Las s; Tian, Pas Ma Cowin LI i I tors s I La w li ra MnaACnou SO ITEMS furl 37,31, mtELL N OU! COSTS _ _ - ymp cors4o 0rdeceOi 1% nil r4 1 ' 14i If a (ems Qwr:,r/1yQ Ctr/ytie Si' Si al _ I • x141 CONTINGEJ iE3 4 OTHER COS /1 St Of CU I K1 + 1 ,tOt�u toutTitucnofl,I l 42,►1rT �` T ra Cast per nil Ktx 39 rtoveneets KR 11 :sects ;Orr rR:a I'd WCR U 12 Wes 3 3 11 Inn 11 S7411Kt ICI l S SS2s 134 &7 33 litho ll S w 0 SC' 13 52.1.1 MC 33 MI? Sr 0 St CTR !GI Q X11 le etri. 44 /8C DC 0tLI rouse » t e rui r vr.n 1alA 414.7111( sap Pal T S'SI /4G trait Cool SIOJOJ ay"Jifs ‘.r;mq WU. itch r tat' E'R'Jy miri to c r r- c- tow fa+q sot foots. ABC WV's( 134J,11E Diver)* abets ro rsa, lArafl TW 300 mgr. 5) sr, 5, Utley max Amor Ina drht4ltd*ka awl' an '1rrjtxlf 5381 CAC wet ' role wan 30' ?no • 3T •Ide SIa%Li $ .441 CSC. Cst+ytnc7 S, UM Aso ELM'S(' ISM 011 :A ? rt ills Sv, $41YLDOC TOTAL CORN TRUC n it an7I1 Mil rtc4 E -%r e's LW TOTAL PROJECT /graft 1- Road lntprof enteral h) Wehl flintsre DRAFT CDOT 000969 US85 CDOT/UPRR ROW Agreement WCR Closures, Project 0853-108 (22370) WCR 29 WCR 29 is a gravel road that intersects US 85 between Gilcrest and Platteville. US 85 is situated approximately 50 feet west of the railroad. Closure of WCR 29 will require an amendment to the Access Control Plan. There has been little public pushback on this closure, and it has been identified as part of Group 1. SCOPE Phase 1 improvements will include installation of barriers and barricades, removal of railroad signage, and removal of asphalt pavement. US 85 work includes the removal of the left turn deceleration lane, right turn deceleration lane, and right turn acceleration lane signing and striping. Phase 2 improvements associated with this closure include a cul-de-sac or hammerhead on the east side of the crossing. ROW needed for improvements for cul-de-sac or hammerhead. US 85 work includes reestablishment of east drainage ditch. SCHEDULE Phase 1: Construction complete summer 2018 Phase 2: Likely summer 2019 BUDGET Phase 1: $50,000 Phase 2: $100,000 (conceptual, no plans yet) TOTAL: $ 150,000 DRAFT FACT SHEET April 30, 2018 Proposed County Road Closures WCR 104 WCR 100 WCR 78` WCR 37` WCR 72 0 Street • WCR 35/46 WCR 33 WCR 29 WCR 30 WCR 18.5' WCR 4' WCR 2.5' Nunn Ault Eaton Greeley La Salle Peckham Interchange WCR 44/US 85 Platteville Fort Lupton t N CDOT 000970 US85 CDOT/UPRR ROW Agreement FACT SHEET WCR Closures, Project 0853-108 (22370) WCR 29 (coat.) WCR Railroad Closures Opinion of Probable Cost FIR/FOR 03/5/18 rev. 03/27/18 April 30, 2018 Na ITEM UNIT IT COST QUANTITY COST COMMENTS WCR 29 202 00ZIC REMOVAL OF ASPHALT MAT f SY S 70.00/ 228 S - 6.b/0 00 202-00250 REMOVAL OF PAVEMEKT ►MARA ›.., . SF S 5 00 1087 S a 5 435 00` 202-005!0 ?( lit vAL OF GROUND SIGN EA S 200.00 10 S 2.000 00 514.00011 SIGN PANEL Ct_ASS r) SF S 30-00 I I 5 330 00 614 00017 SIGH PANEL CLASS t; SF a S 35.00 72 S 2.520 0q D4CM TUS N o) IF 3 20 OC U S 1.760 CIO $ t 4 no220 51 ttL 31GN POST f2 S X 2.5 •tt-A0]17 9Ai6O.Aot (TYPE 3 F E EA S 500 X 2 S 1 000 OD 6Jd0020 SANITARY FACRITY EA 3 2.500 OC _ 1 $ 2.500 00 L9 S 13 000 OL 1 S 10 000 00 Kept in per FIRFOR tirat. 12'-d0U00 CONS T RUC 1 ION SU RVE YNG 5 2 7 410005 EPDXY PA.3 4 in MAPS. `vG GAL 3 200 OC no $ 1.440 00 630-40335 URRIG DE (TYPE 3 16-A) (Ttl.toRs? t l EA S 200 OCR 1 S 200 00 630-50331 CONS TRLICTlOt4 TRAFFIC S1GN :PANEL SUE A) EA S 5000 1 S SO Ot EA _ S 60 :5 S GO 00 4)&-40:342 CONSTRl/LT1ON TRAFFIC SIGN (PANEL SIZE 8) 630-ttM4 CCM4STRUCilON TRAFFIC SIGH (SPEC:M.) SF S 3000 S 0 0C Y1ARY, IF S 30 00 40 3 2000 OR 430 O0J70 CONCRETE SARIEE$ (TE►z 700 RA TRAFT1C COSJTWX. I LS S PIK.OO I S Vitt OC1 !0SC of od treas 700-70360 FAA ERO SION COMM. L8 3 S 00( _ S 5.000 CC N44d lo rtniss to firs per car --.4r . (CM 0.321 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION SID ITEMS MISCELLANEOUS COSTS /.o4C1O C:?tC:RJ1CT REVISIONS `:`h CF CBI C 2 164 OS EROSION CUtr'Pol 9•OR 5`t Of CBI S S 2.164 OS IWATFR UGMT CONTINGENCIES & OTHER COSTS 5% OF CBI I 2.!G6 os 49,919 $ 50.040 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION ITEMS (CQ Phi(Se C'tsl-rk••MI§ lwuttr•+ttA+rad ht 1YrW (•nitant DRAFT CDOT 000971 US85 CDOT/UPRR ROW Agreement WCR Closures, Project 0853-108 (22370) WCR 33 WCR 33 is paved in this section and intersects the railroad between Platteville and Gilcrest, just south of WCR 44. US 85 is offset approximately 300 feet from the intersection. In addition to closing the railroad crossing, access from WCR 33 onto US 85 from the north will also be closed. There has been little public pushback on this project, primarily due to the industrial development on the southeast corner of US 85 and WCR 44 and associated improvements, including a developed access south to WCR 42, east of the railroad. WCR 33 will remain open as a detour during construction of the Peckham interchange; closure will occur subsequent to interchange opening. As such, this is a Group 2 closure. SCOPE All improvements will occur concurrently with the Peckham interchange project. Improvements include removal of railroad signage, removal of asphalt pavement and a cul-de-sac or hammerhead on the southeast side of the crossing. US 85 work potentially includes the removal of auxiliary lane signing and striping, but final improvements to be determined concurrent with the Peckham interchange design. Access to the south frontage road will remain, although access will be restricted. ROW may be needed for improvements for cul-de-sac or hammerhead. SCHEDULE Construction will be completed in 2021/2022. BUDGET TOTAL: $ 100,000 (conceptual, no plans yet) DRAFT FACT SHEET April 30, 2018 Proposed County Road Closures WCR 104 WCR 100 Nunn WCR 78' WCR 37' WCR 72 O Street WCR 35/46 WCR 33 — _ WCR 29 WCR 30 WCR 18.5' WCR4' - WCR 2.5' Ault Eaton Greeley La Salle Peckham Interchange WCR 44/US 85 Platteville Fort Lupton r N CDOT 000972 US85 CDOT/UPRR ROW Agreement FACT SHEET flak; _t. _- ::_. -1=4. .:..— WCR Closures, Project 0853-108 (22370) April 30, 2018 ,- - yr -7.? WCR 33 (cont.) Removal and new signing and striping on US 85 by CDOT. Improvements will be coordinated with Peckham 'nterchange project DRAFT Future interchange Cote- wr/hammyt heed hiWeld County after invert firmer rs completed CDOT 000973 US85 CDOT/UPRR ROW Agreement WCR Closures, Project 0853-108 (22370) WCR 46/35 WCR 46 is a gravel road that turns into WCR 35 at the intersection with US 85. The intersection of WCR 46/34 and US 85 is located just north of Peckham. The railroad is offset approximately 50 feet east of US 85. An amendment to the Access Control Plan is needed for the crossing closure. Western access off of US 85 will not be removed. This is a Group 1 closure, and has generated little public reaction. The connection between WCR 46 and WCR 35 on the east side of the tracks is parallel to the tracks and within UPRR ROW. This road will likely need to be shifted in the future. SCOPE Phase 1 improvements include installation of barriers and barricades, removal of railroad signage, removal of asphalt pavement. US 85 work includes the removal of the left turn deceleration lane, right turn deceleration lane and right turn acceleration lane signing and striping, and installation of detour signing and striping. Phase 2 improvements associated with this closure include reconstruction of the connection of WCR 46 into WCR 35 outside of railroad ROW and associated ROW acquisition. US 85 work includes potential reestablishment of east drainage ditch between US 85 and UPRR. SCHEDULE Phase 1: Construction complete summer 2018 Phase 2: Following Phase 1 improvements, anticipated summer 2019 BUDGET Phase 1: $50,000 Phase 2: $600,000 (conceptual, no plans yet) TOTAL: $ 650,000 DRAFT FACT SHEET April 30, 2018 Proposed County Road Closures WCR 104 WCR 100 Nunn WCR 78' WCR 37' WCR 72 0 Street WCR 35/46 WCR 33 WCR 29 WCR 30 Ault Eaton Greeley La Salle Peckham I Interchange WCR 44/US 85 teville WCR 18.5* -- WCR 4' WCR 2.5' fort Lupton r N CDOT 000974 US85 CDOT/UPRR ROW Agreement a_ . Z K-____ a- Wrrr rt.;.s aa' n— - z - ;a a- rncs-"a I_.. - . ._ n ., r _ •- WCR Closures, Project 0853-108 (22370) WCR 35/46 (cont.) FACT SHEET April 30, 2018 P'nf'17 _� C 1... -_ ...... n .. _ v. .. _ ._ - r---'7 r '. �� `��'.�'r2 "! - ' a a. z. u.. emirs_ -ti lob No. ITEM UNIT UNIT CO QUANTITY COST COMMENTS WCR 46-35 202-00220 REA1CNAL CF ASPHALT MAT SY S 10 OC 122 s 9660 00 202+)O25C REMOVAL OF PAVEMENT UAR*#VGS SF S S i99 $ 1995 00 202-00110 REICvAL OF GROVIve SIGN EA 3 200 •., 16 S 3,600 CC 611.00011 SIGN PANEL (CLASS I) SF s 30 19 S 570 00 61/00012 SIGN PANEL (CLASS n) SF S 35 54 5 1 1.50 00` 611-00220 STEEL SIGN POST (25 X 25 WCH TUSD40) LF S 20 97 1 1.440 00 611 80312 BARRSCAOE (TYPE J F S) EA S 500 2 S 1000 00 62400020 SANITARY FACILITY EA 3 2.500 0( 1 S 2.500 00 LS S 10000 1 S 10 000 0S Kepi n per FIR -FOR Qscuition 625-00000 CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING 627 0000'3 EPDXY PAVEMENT MARKING GAL S 200 8 76 f 1 756 Or 43060335 9ARIbCACE (TYPE 3 I4 -A) ;Tf.1+tCRARY) EA S 200 2 i S 100 00 EA 3 SO t4 630 80311 CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC SIGN 'PANEL SIZE A) 1 700 00 63040312 Ct7NS'RUCTlON TRAFFIC SIGN (PANEL &ZE B) EA S 60 0 S 0 CG SF S 30 12 S 460OC 630-6034/ CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC SIGN (SPECIALI LF S 50 40 S 1000 OR 630-60370 CON: RE :E BARfiriR (TEIPORA*Y) 700 FrA -RAft1C COMTROL LS S 2,371 1 S 1371 6C ;0% d Dd +tents 700-70360 Fie, EROSION ! ON-rRIDI LS S S 00C 1 S 5 000 OG Need b wets' to lir'n per Cr -. TOTAL CONSTRUCTION BID ITEMS (CBI) 491343 MISCELLANEOUS COSTS MINOR CONTRA.C T REVISIONS 5% Of CB' S 2 167 13 EROSION CONTROL r STORJ W ATF}2 MC,AR 5'.t Of C.84 S 2.4P 11 CONTINGENCIES L OTHER COSTS - 5% OF CBI S 2.467 11� TOTAL, CQN$TRVCT1Oh ITEMS (Ct) 54.744 . $ 34.000 Phase 1 - Removal and new signing and striping on US 85 by CDOT Phase ?- Reestablishment of drainage by CDOT DRAFT Pha.1r 2- Mouths at. IruprorenrrntS *id ROW hi Weld County CDOT 000975 U585 CDOT/UPRR_ROW_Agreement WCR Closures, Project 0853-108 (22370) O Street East O Street is a paved road in Weld County north of the City of Greeley. US 85 is offset 200 feet west of the railroad. Closure will require an amendment to the Access Control Plan. Adjacent business owner feedback has led to further consideration of supplemental improvements as mitigation for the closure, including a "Michigan U" south of the intersection on Bypass US 85 and intersection improvements on WCR 41/WCR 66 and WCR 41/O Street. These supplemental improvements are currently under consideration. Weld County will not close O Street until detour improvements are constructed. UPRR indicated that the O Street closure was their highest priority. This is a Group 2 closure. SCOPE Phase 1 improvements will include installation of barriers and barricades, removal of railroad signage and removal of asphalt pavement. US 85 work includes the removal of the left turn deceleration lane, right turn deceleration lane and right turn acceleration lane signing and striping. The various detour improvement alternatives are being assessed. Associated work includes utility relocations, drainage improvements, potentially railroad spur crossing, and potentially ROW acquisition. Phase 2 improvements associated with this closure include work on US 85, including removal of median crossover and reestablishment of median and east drainage ditch. SCHEDULE Phase 1: Estimated for summer 2019 Phase 2: TBD based on other local projects BUDGET Phase 1: Phase 2: TOTAL: $100,000 + $2,400,000 (Michigan U) $100,000 (conceptual, no plans yet) $ 2,600,000 DRAFT FACT SHEET April 30, 2018 Proposed County Road Closures WCR 1O4 WCR 78' WCR 37• WCR 72 O Street WCR 35/46 WCR 33 WCR 29 WCR 30 WCR4' - WCR 2.5' Eaton Greeley Peckham interrhonge WCR 44/US 85 Platteville 1 N CDOT 000976 U585_CDOT/UPRR ROW Agreement t-ft...-sras_:—r.:laG*_.._.{.a�-+t WCR Closures, Project 0853-108 (22370) ,.... ,t - - O Street (cunt.) Na 3,11 tM7 Alla Gt?1ft , CST aumern1' I O ITRUT ]41MS7Tl Malt OP AiM1ti IfST St 1 )oi/ 1 lL 1 44.7* BS 470 44710 REMOVAL 011 WA%u& of YMefrC3 it 1 Sts 1 Ttt 1 1061 O4 2aelr0 R1NOVAiC0101109W LA $ >Wtt I I 1O00 OM 4001 1 1504110 El ruins a I 2a tl Y $ no to V 1 IA 1 IAN CO 11440 U 012 1Qi PAM R A 11 LI $ 3 'r4 t t taf ml starersIt Et, ZOOM POO c1 f 4 2 f wee 11x1 CCI Pr 111 CPI 'A1N4GLl rim 7141 EA 1 4 a T SW eatt.2f Ius14R cla n EA 1 1lal\ I 1 Lair is LI 1 K six I 1 1100100 c .-a4a Ct76Tf1fli at/r tniG CK I 1w.C 1 A I 1 y u a AYr acct, omen reso A► aro tiara aAPrIC/4l (NNE 3 {Mf .10.0Fi it EA 1 DM 1 I 270 0c l2)16311 C4716111f:7>Ot 3144/K oat ?was 11a At t4 I IOC l I IS/ll << 444 .4.4 CvdTtlrrtw T/fAfi1C 1•G1 ►A+#E Pa a EA 1 140 1 1 ill a /300344 czfalar fl/ Malt la psi Call 0 I 1ifr1 4 1 4 0C Ufa PO Caaa a40M11 Medal V $ Si Cr Y 1 MOO 401 FA 'Wet COMO LI I 211147 1 I . Inc AV MS, r.A paws carte. _ :3 1 Sat 1 1 WV al TOTAL CONSTRUCTION 810 ITEMS (t51) •120 ltd COS Ts - - 1 . 114211 rair-Lci 0 nista CS Cie l • ra r y ..E10r r13 Cn1rA03. Sec t*TtA 1WWT 11.Or Cal 3 t la r CONTSiGFNCIE3 I O rwER COS r3 , • or CV 1 1'a r TOTAL CONSTR1)CT1oW rots (a) P5,744 11 i PHASE 1 Removal and new signing and striping on US85 try COOT `l too. el PHASE 1 - Barriers, ba'ncades. removal of pavement and signing by COOT (at O street RA aossing ) 8 niszE7' i•Nu3TtE0 SPEC) 6S MPH s Structures • bodge 6 Structures Ws- (w/ Alithetiol 7 Tral& • VIM n8/5 noir% • I relic Control 9 utility Relocations 10 Erosion Co » t: frr.'ortments,l 11 . t,rfe•New 12 Drainage • Modification SUBTOTAL (B) 13 ' raffle - Signals (Mod ) - : SE VOLE a 11 Traffic - Signals (Newt) - USE FOIE d 15 MotrtuatIon 16 Fortr Account arms 17 Contlatency SUBTOTAL (C) CONSTRUCTION TOTAL (DJ 600 FT DECELERATION fig :so ;.ir lK DRAFT la Contructect FACT SHEET April 30, 2018 SF SF % of (A) % of IA) % of (A) %of(A) % oI(A) % of(A) tAH11+(41 %of(D) %ofID) 5F 11M8471RUCK CO Canary 110+0 asn MEDIAN U-TURN CONCEPT AllISCACIIKA01400141531311 S ISO S •0 S 162,100 S 362.500 S 962.500 S 962 500 S 962.500 S 962,500 S 50,000 S 69.000 S 1395,625 S 1.345,625 S 1,395,625 S 2,119,7*• $ 2,119,76• S 2 ..�1a ... .e4 7S RADIULG Project No./Code 14e ass S• 221,0 I r�..1 wa.ar+ 510 JCS' a LI, •,ot, AA 125 67175 21.575 144 375 144,375 138.000 97,691 69,751 415.611 724,163 233,177 466 153 CDOT 000977 US85 CDOT/UPRR ROW Agreement FACT SHEET WCR Closures, Project 0853-108 (22370) April 30, 2018 O Street (cont.) Alternative Improvement — Connector between 0 and WCR 66 (at WCR 39.5) Items 4' ABC 3- land excavation. ABC - 60' ROW MOO FW 300 (assume 5) Cost par mils $340 000 $239 472 $159 848 510 800 $2,400 $340.176 $100 000 $275 000 5381.600 Milne 05 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0 5170 00O S l 1 B 738 $79 82 4 $5.400 $1,200 S170 088 $50 000 5137 Sao 50 TB 18' 5 5% 34' wide HMA 64-22 S bottom mat HMA 84-28 SX top mat T Traffic Control Signing and Striping New roadway through *gin embankment, facing soft spots, Drainage c. verts, rip rap. Utility relocates Average cast of one ssei Irrigation canal - single span bridgo Ion crossing an 30' max x 32" wide Sub -Total 51 849.096 $733 748 Contingency 15% 1438 840 $110 062 52,287,936 $843,810 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION ROW and Fasrrrents $21SF 158400 5318 800 TOTAL PROJECT $1,161.000 Phase 1 - Removal and new signing and striping on US 85 by COOT DRAFT CDOT 000978 US85 _ CDOT/UPRR ROW Agreement WCR Closures, Project 0853-108 (22370) MR 72 FACT SHEET April 30, 2018 ..i n,.a� _ ...x.a arreeasre_ tegierallentalla WCR 72 is a gravel road located just south of Eaton. US 85 is offset approximately 70 feet west of the railroad. Closure of WCR 72 will require an amendment to the Access Control Plan. This is a Group 1 closure. The Town of Eaton was asked to withdraw their Energy & Impact Grant Application as intersection improvements needed at WCR 39/72 are developer -driven. Safety equipment ordered for this intersection with Section 130 money will be used at Sth Street. SCOPE Phase 1 improvements will include installation of barriers and barricades, removal of railroad signage, and removal of asphalt pavement. No improvements necessary on US 85. Phase 2 improvements associated with this closure include a cul-de-sac or hammerhead on the east side of the crossing. Substantial utilities in the area may complicate construction, and ROW acquisition will be required for improvements for cul-de-sac. SCHEDULE Phase 1: Construction complete summer of 2018 Phase 2: Anticipated summer 2019 BUDGET Phase 1: $50,000 Phase 2: $100,000 (conceptual, no plans yet) TOTAL: $ 150,000 DRAFT Proposed County Road Closures WCR 104 WCR 100 Nunn WCR 78' WCR 37' WCR 72 O Street WCR 35/46 WCR 33 WCR 29 WCR 30 WCR 18.5' — WCR 4* WCR 2.5' Ault Eaton Greeley La Salle Peckham interchange WCR 44/US 85 Platteville • Fort Lupton 1 N CDOT 000979 U585 CDOT/UPRR ROW Agreement FACT SHEET WCR Closures, Project 0853-108 (22370) WCR 72 (cont.) is s April 30, 2018 No. MA UNIT COST QUANTITY COST COMMENTS WCR 72 'UNIT 202-00220 REJMO/AL OF ASPHALT MT EY 1 30 CC 2f! B G43 00 J 202-X230 REMOVAL OF PAVEMENT MARXNNG5 iF $ S.00 0 4 000 202-00810 REMOVAL OF GROUND SIGN EA S ?CO MI I S 1 180 00 114-00011 SIGN PANEL (CLASS t) IF 5 30OC 13 S 300 OC 614-00012 SIGN PANEL (CLAIMS) SF S 35.00 72 5 2 S20 OC LF $ 20 0[\ U 5 1 750 OC 614-00220 STEEL SKY/ POST (15 X 2 S NCH TURING) • t4 -eD 71 Z t1AR10CADE (TYPE J F-6) EAe S S00 4C\ 2 $ 1 000 001 620-00020 SANITARY FACILITY EA S 2.500.00 1 $ 2.500 00 52500000 CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING LS S 10 000 0c4 1 5 10 000 00 Kap1 in pit FIR -FOR dnaanfli GAL S 200 0(1 030 $ 60 OC 127.00005 EPDXY PAVEMENT 14ARKVNO 630-0033S BARRICADE (TYPE 3 M -A) (TEARY) 4 EA 1 200-00 1 1 2C0 OC EA S 50 0C\ S $ 250 004 634 80341 CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC SIGN IPANEL SIZE A) i EA i S W 0C 1 5 60 00 630.1342 CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC SIGN (PANEL. SIZE B) 530-80344 CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC SIGN (SPE0AL1 SF $ 30 0U 3 S 000 l F S 50 001 44 1 LOCO 00N 630-60379 CONCRETE BAR$CF R ('E LPORARY) 700 F/A TRAFFIC CONTROL L S $ 2.074 OC: 1 S 2.07400` '0% of bed Mon 700.70380 F/A EROSION CONTROL _ L8 1 5.000 I 5 5.000.001( MNad to rsvw to Cs Ocr carnfl TOTAL CONSTRUCTION BID ITEMS (CBI) 31,054 MISCELLANEOUS COSTS LW4OR CONTRACT REV15IONS 1� i I OF CZ 1 1 IC= ., a EROSION COt4 RfW OI / STOWATER MOUT - er OF CBI 1 ' eG' 't 4ti OF COI S 1.02 70 CON77NOENCIES & OTHER COSTS TOTAL CONSTRUCTION ITEMS (CI) 43,762 $ 50,000 Phase 1- No improvements to Us 85 by COOT Phase 2 Reestablishment of drainage by COOT Phase 1- Barriers, barricades, removal of pavement, signing by CDOT Phase 2- Cul-de-sac-ham merhead by Weld County DRAFT CDOT 000980 US85 CDOT/UPRR ROW Agreement WCR Closures, Project 0853-108 (22370) FACT SHEET April 30, 2018 WCR 100 The intersection of US 85 and WCR 100 is located in Nunn. WCR 100 is a gravel road and US 85 is offset approximately 100 feet west of the railroad. This is a Group 2 closure because the Town of Nunn has requested an east/west connector road. Weld County will enter into an IGA with the Town of Nunn to use funding to construct WCR 98 between US 85 and WCR 29. CDOT will need to make improvements on US 85 similar to the auxiliary lane improvements at WCR 100. In addition, WCR 31 between WCR 100 and WCR 98 on the east is a gravel road that will need to be widened and treated with magnesium chloride. Weld County will include these improvements within the IGA with Nunn. SCOPE Phase 1 improvements will include installation of barriers and barricades, removal of railroad signage, and removal of asphalt pavement. Improvements on US 85 include signing and striping. The Town of Nunn has insisted that detour improvements be complete prior to closure of WCR 100. Weld County will do this work, and share ROW ownership with the Town of Nunn, so ROW acquisition will not be required. Phase 2 will include improvement to WCR 31 east of the tracks. Weld County may need help with the costs of the initial application of magnesium chloride. Should a cul-de-sac or hammerhead be necessary east of the tracks, ROW acquisition will be required and substantial utilities will need to be relocated. SCHEDULE Phase 1: Construction complete summer/fall of 2018 (if closure is not contingent on supplemental improvements, closure could occur sooner) Phase 2: Anticipated summer 2019 BUDGET Phase 1: Phase 2: TOTAL: $50,000 + $1.5M (WCR 98) + $2.7M (US 85 Improvements) $100,000 (conceptual, no plans yet) $4,350,000 DRAFT Proposed County Road Closures WCR 104 WCR 100 WCR 78' WCR 37' WCR 72 O Street WCR 35/46 WCR 33 WCR 29 WCR 30 WCR 18.5` WCR 4` WCR 2.5* Nunn Ault Eaton Greeley La Salle Peckham Interchange WCR 44/1)5 85 Platteville Fort Lupton r N CDOT 000981 US85 CDOT/UPRR ROW Agreement WCR Closures, Project 0853-108 (22370) WCR 100 (cont.) Na ITEM UNIT QUM(TTT1l COST INCA 140 732240230 RfyWM Of ASF1M1T RAT $1 I 70.14 M7 $ 421000 • 710 can*Ii71OVA1 Of INAYCY[XT IM1 CIII I. I a TUC 0 1 ea Mal I0 KN0VK OF Cootie Yoe fA s no srr/ 7 I SOB TS I 1 70,06 if 1 SSW as4.0a1 t scat PAWL 1CLAIR n Iua.IrI star Monti CLASS n s. 1 RUC $3 1 2100 Oa Hsi= sTtia cwt post a s i 21 604 ram; tt s muck r7 a 1 IN a CA I Iaoar\ 7 I , MO IS SWOP u &taAOe Mfg 7141 inn tMtrtA tY raArTY f f 1 2lss% • $ 736 ee tl a ,a s ap _ --.- t NUS N 06000 ovsT* cnw a l at na imams Dior MVcuote MARKING iK S MAC A rp $ IRS OC ari.s771 wwtAOE Mtn 7 ua (TINTORAlrr, FA • s ilea\ I MN Olen oo 41nucna+ nun vain M AI M $ Ia CC I I na 00 p0•.0342 C016Ta .c ycw TRAFFIC VAN owlet an et U s sac s as a tuaO[sw Gram cT10w TROPIC ICAI Ol/O•OALI SR I AK a I s se IF I 10 ei. '0 1 201 to 1.164113 711 (Xela[tn ROME R nit nen LJ $ 2131.1 I I 202! It no FAA TRAFFIC CARTIat rfa.resat rMCROWN Gonna u $ LW I 1 Ewalt TOTAL. CowsTRVCnoN � �' (Cm , s* COS TI I &SO CONTRACT Rf+rsas ri d a $ T Sn ,f MOO ION COaRTaCR I ITow/ftATT1a SCUT f1+ Or Cal $ I • Il It CONTINGENCIES t OTHER COSTS 5% Cc CO I 1.Nlta I 5QTAL CONSTRUCTION ITEMS (Cu 37.034 Pte 1- N8#S8 Adeiary lanes on US !3 by CDOI PAtt.e I- Raw! lny'nn sneers 1»' K tit/ • 'thorn Mar l•Road harem a a116y Wthl Cawanr Phase ? Cr R .k- sari Ikrnlwe rhea/ c � V31(•tanwn /Amur I Read begtenrtar•wrl bT tl1'tiaf Cowin FACT SHEET April 30, 2018 Pro)ect ft 1121116.27 ITEM 1 I 3 4 S 7 a 9 10 11 U U 14 13 IS 17 11 1! 20 DISOWTION Lan:heort and Removals Surfacing Curb and Critter Sdewalit SUBTOTAL (A) Structures Bridge Stnxturns Wall (w/ Aesthetics) Traffic - signing/Striping Traffic Control Utility Reiocatlans Erasion Control/Ernranment.-' Drainage New Drainage - Modification SUOTOTAL (11 Traffic - Signab (Mod 1 • USE VOLE E Traffic Signals (Neel • USE POLE W Mobil r at ion Forte Account Items Contingency SUBTOTAL (C) CONSTRUCTION TOTAL (0) COOT In -Direct Design Engineering CDOT In -Direct . Construction Engtnetrirg Right at Wa'/T:newnent Acquisition PROJECT TOTAL (E) WIT CT SY IF SY QUANTITY SI % of (A) % OI (A) %of(A) %d (A) % o((A) % d (A) EACH EACH %of (A)+{B) % of (A)4 -(B) % of (A)•(B) (AMINO 32000 7700 0 0 0 0 5% 7% 3% 15% 1S% 0% 0 0 7% 5% 30% LOOT COST S 10 S SS S u S 45 S S $ S S S S S $ S S S ISO S 80 S 1.140,500 S 1,140,500 S 1,140,500 S 1,140,500 S 1,14&500 S 1,140-500 S 50,000 S 69,000 S 1,653,723 S 1,653,725 $ 1453,725 S 2,34190 S 2.3290 S 2 Use S 1,540,500 TOTAL COST 640,000 500.500 S7 025 79,135 14,215 171,075 171,075 S $ S S S S $ 513,125 115.161 V.686 496,111 $ 2.4.190 S S 2516,312 516.624 2.4O4.W1 DRA {elms Cast per asla tfR 1D0 Prscornei Is Newby 1rrR *Itchier Dal 21 zc r a 31 kin T n 11 *51114 salt J N3C 5310 A( 1 SIL) 0.t. .1l 64.22 S 1/4O:m mi 13' 123117; I 1n9 4Tt It+164-21 SI tt- rat 1 s•10,S4f I S tS3 4++1 `Tilt• Creel MCI I 1:3,1 *N'9aMSTpn0- S2.C I 12cEr St -sisal 1r34 tin u•d et:J.tLcn Mlrisu*^e I, Int; tat ipd1, ARC 6: ?fin•! S7c0 rf CS 1173 Na n+gs aavn fb nip, Meal PO 331 iodine Si 5132 "CC I $1O0 _Ulf *me S2'i:CC I SIr'i0- ',..wee ad d re red MI)! kr trawl a ilaiLaczrui any. ate n37nue 112 moil 5,]11 ttr 0 (Stis•Tctd $1149:0g $1 217 S13i. S1; PUP `1I r2arr[ ; 54A TOTAL CONSTRUCTION 12X7 fl $1 41201 4n1 Easements MET D TOTAL PROJECT $1,42 DRAFT CDOT 000982 US85 CDOT/UPRR ROW Agreement WCR Closures, Project 0853-108 (22370) WCR 104 WCR 104 is a gravel road located north of Nunn, just north of the bridge over the railroad. US85 is situated east of the railroad at this location, offset approximately 450 feet. To this point there has been little public pushback on this closure, and supplemental improvements are likely unnecessary. As such, we have identified the closure as part of Group 1, and work should be complete in Phase 1. SCOPE Phase 1 improvements include installation of barriers and barricades, removal of railroad signage, and removal of asphalt pavement. No improvements are necessary on US 85. There will be no Phase 2 improvements associated with this closure. SCHEDULE Phase 1: Construction complete early summer of 2018 No work is anticipated for Phase 2. BUDGET Phase 1: Phase 2: TOTAL: $ 50,000 $0 $ 50,000 DRAFT FACT SHEET April 30, 2018 Proposed County Road Closures WCR104 -- WCR 100 WCR 78* WCR 37* WCR 72 O Street Nunn Ault WCR 35/46 WCR 33 WCR 29 WCR 3O WCR 18.5* — WCR 4* - WCR 2.5* 0 Eaton Gree;ey La Salle Peckham Interchange WCR 44/US 85 P?atteville Fort Lupton t N CDOT 000983 U585 CDOT/UPRR ROW Agreement FACT SHEET WCR Closures, Project 0853-108 (22370) WCR 104 (cont.) April 30, 2018 seiefrpor No. ITEM UNIT UNIT COST QUANTITY COST COMMENTS WCR 104 202-00220 REMOVAL OF ASPHALT ANT SY I 30.00 0 $ 0.00 ?02 0.250 REMOVAL OF PAVEItNT WARXDNGS SF 4 S S.00 0 1 0 00 202-00110 REMOVAL OF (IRCX.*C SIGN EA 3 5 600 DO 3 200 IX s 41440011 SIGN PANEL (CLASS I) SF 7 30 OC` 11 S 330 0Q 414-00017 SIGN PALL (CLASS 11') _ SF S 36.0C 72 S 2520 00 t4C1 TUBINCO LF S 20 00 77 1 1 $40 DO 111-00220 STEEL SIGN POST a2 5X2.5 414-40317 BARRICADE (TYPE 3 F-5) yr EA S S00 0C 2 $ 1 000 00 420-00020 SANITARY FACILITY EA p $ 2.500.(X' 1 S 2500 0G U $ 10,000 os t S so 000 Do Kips r pet FIR -FOR dhnttaion 1125-00000 Ca4STRUCTION SURVEYING *27-00006 EPDXY PAVEI.ENT AAAAI(INO GAL * 1 TOO.00 000 S 000 430-403]5 BARRICADE (TYPE 3 IA -A) fl PORARY) EA S 200-OC 2 $ 400 OC $10.40341 CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC SIGN IPA E1 SIZE Al EA 1 50 CC 5 1 S 300 DC (PANE. SIZE B) EA - $ 40 0C 2 + $ 120 00 43080342 O KSTRUCTION TRAFFIC SIGN 1130•&0344 CONISTRUCTIO+4 TRAFFIC SIGN (SPECIAL) SF I 30 0 S 0 00 AP'n IF 1 SOOC 4O S 2.0000C /3090310 CONCRETE BARRIER (TEWOOi 700 FAA TRAFFIC CONTROL LS S 2,011.0(1 t S 2.071 00 1011 of bed den! 700-70380 FA EROSION COKTwot LS I S OOC 1 S S 000 00 Need 10 revise to Arms per correnenh TOTAL CONSTRUCTION 810 ITEMS ICSI) 25,381 MISCELLANEOUS COS TS I Attht3R CONTRACT REVISIONS 5% Of CSI 1 1.41Y OS\ s. 5% Of CSI ! 1.119 OS EROSION CONTROL t STORIMA1tR 1,ICiA(T CONTINGENCIES S OTHER COSTS 5% of 081 I 11,419 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION ITEMSC1I 32.63 $ 80444 Phase 1- Barriers, barricades, removal of pavement, signing by CDOT DRAFT CDOT 000984 US85 CDOT/UPRR ROW Agreement WCR Closures, Project 0853-108 (22370) WCR 78/37 WCR 78 is a gravel road located between Eaton and Ault. US 85 is offset approximately 60 feet west of the railroad. Closure of WCR 78 will require an amendment to the Access Control Plan. This 's a Group 2 closure. WCR 37 is a paved road that intersects US 85 just south of WCR 78. Closure of WCR 37 and 78 must occur concurrently for UPRR to receive the operational benefit. This closure is intended to replace WCR 18.5 and possibly WCR 4 in the ROW Agreement. There has been little pushback from the public, but th's closure was not part of the original public meeting so the extent of opposition is unknown. SCOPE Phase 1 improvements wi l include installation of barriers and barricades and removal of railroad signage. No improvements necessary on US 85. Phase 2 improvements associated with this closure include a cul-de-sac or hammerhead on the east side of the crossing and construction of a roadside ditch between US 85 and the tracks. ROW acquisition will be required for the cul-de-sac. This closure requires a connector road between WCR 37 and WCR 76. The Eaton Draw floodplain is located in this area. UPRR has indicated that they will allow construction of the connector road in their ROW, and that the landowner is under a lease with them that they are able to terminate if necessary. SCHEDULE Phase 1: Construction complete summer of 2018 Phase 2: Anticipated summer 2019 BUDGET Phase 1: $50,000 (conceptual, not yet assessed) Phase 2: $100,000 (conceptual, not yet assessed) + $1,200,000 (Connector Rd) TOTAL: $ 1,350,000 DRAFT FACT SHEET April 30, 2018 Proposed County Road Closures WCR 104 WCR 100 WCR 78* WCR 37* WCR 72 0 Street Nunn Ault WCR 35/46 WCR 33 WCR 29 WCR 30 WCR 18.5* WCR 4* _ WCR 2.5* • Eaton Greeley La Salle Peckham Interchange WCR 44/US 85 Platteville Fort Lupton r N CDOT 000985 DRAFT US85 CDOT/UPRR ROW Agreement FACT SHEET r WCR Closures, Project 0853-108 (22370) WCR 78/37 (cont.) DRAFT Items 0TB 16' ® 5% 34' wide. 4' ABC HMA 64-22 S bottom mat 3' HMA 64-28 SX top mat r Troffic Control Signing and Striping New roadway through vnrgin land excavation, ernbaninrnent., firing sat' spots, ABC - 60' ROW Drainage ctrtver's. rip rap, Mira(1 FW 300 (assume 5) UtAily relocates Average cost of one steel bridge for crossing an Irrigation canal • singlo span 30' max x 37 wide 7 Cost per mile 5340.000 5239.472 5159,648 $10,800 $2,400 5340,176 5100,000 $275.000 5381,800 WCR 37 between WCR 78 and WCR 76 Mites 0 4 5138,000 0 4 595,788.80 0 4 563,859.20 0 4 $4,320 0 4 5960 0 4 $136,070 40 0 4 540,000 0 4 5110.000 0 $43 Sub -Total S 1,849,096 5586, 996 Contingency 15' . 5'I38•840 S88 050 $2,287,936 $675,048 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION ROW and Easements 52/SF 253440 5508.880 TOTAL PROJECT $1,182,000 r April 30, 2018 Phase 2 - Reestabiishment of drainage by COOT on US 65 Phase 1 -Removal and new signing and striping by COOT on US 85 Phase 2 Reestablishment of drainage by CDOT on US S5 -..., W-'.. CDOT 000986 Hello