The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20182207.tiffPage 3 of I LIST OF FIGURES 1. Site Location 3 2. Existing Intersection Geometry 4 3. Recent Peak Hour Traffic 6 4. Averaged Recent Peak Hour Traffic 7 5. Site Plan 10 6. Trip Distribution 12 7. Short Range (2023) Background Peak Hour Traffic 13 8. Long Range (2040) Background Peak Hour Traffic 14 9. Short Range (2023) Site Generated Peak Hour Traffic 15 10. Long Range (2040) Site Generated Peak Hour Traffic 16 11. Short Range (2023) Total Peak Hour Traffic 17 12. Long Range (2040) Total Peak Hour Traffic 18 13. Short Range (2023) Geometry 20 14. Long Range (2040) Geometry 21 APPENDICES A. Base Assumptions Form B. Peak Hour Traffic Counts C. Current Peak Hour Operation/Level of Service Descriptions D. Signal Warrant E. Short Range (2023) Background Peak Hour Operation F. Long Range (2040) Background Peak Hour Operation G. Short Range (2023) Total Peak Hour Operation H. Long Range (2040) Total Peak Hour Operation )ut:blank --/1 L-..DELICH r— ASSOCIATES "PUBIC tit VA) 07--/62 "l$ Red Barn Subdivision TIS. March 2018 2018-2207 6/27/2( Page 4 of l I. INTRODUCTION This Transportation Impact Study (TIS) addresses the capacity, geometric, and control requirements for the proposed Red Barn Subdivision development. The proposed Red Barn Subdivision site is located in the southwest quadrant of the Colorado (Weld County Road 13)/Weld County Road 32 (WCR32) intersection in Mead, Colorado. During the course of the analysis, numerous contacts were made with the project developer (Rocky Ridge Civil Engineering) and the Town of Mead traffic engineering consultant. This study generally conforms to the format set forth in the Mead TIS Guidelines. Appendix A contains the Traffic Impact Study Base Assumptions form and related attachments for the Red Barn Subdivision. The study involved the following steps: Collect physical, traffic, and development data; - Perform trip generation, trip distribution, and trip assignment; Determine peak hour traffic volumes; Conduct capacity and operational level of service analyses on key intersections; - Analyze signal warrants; t---DELICH Red Barn Subdivision TIS. March 2018 r -ASSOCIATES Page 1 ntit:blank 6/27/2( Page 4ofI I, INTRODUCTION This Transportation Impact Study (TIS) addresses the capacity, geometric, and control requirements for the proposed Red Barn Subdivision development. The proposed Red Barn Subdivision site is located in the southwest quadrant of the Colorado (Weld County Road 13)/ veld County Road 32 (WOR32) intersection in Mead, Colorado. During the course of the analysis, numerous contacts were made with the project developer (Rocky Ridge Civil Engineering) and the Town of Mead traffic engineering consultant. This study generally conforms to the format set forth in the Mead TIS Guidelines, Appendix A contains the Traffic Impact Study Base Assumptions form and related attachments for the Red Barn Subdivision, The study involved the following steps: - Collect physical, traffic, and development data; Perform trip generation, trip distribution, and trip assignment; Determine peak hour traffic volumes: Conduct capacity and operational level of service analyses on key intersections; Analyze signal warrants; 1—DELICH —� r ASSOCIATES Red Barn Subdivision TIS, March 2018 Page 1 mit : b l ..nk r Page 5 of 1 II. EXISTING ONDITIONS The location of the Red Barn Subdivision site is shown in Figure 1. It is important that a thorough understanding of the existing conditions be presented. Land Use Land uses in the area are primarily residential, agricultural, or open. There are residential uses to the southeast of the site, There are some industrial/commercial uses to the west of the Red Barn Subdivision site (near 1-25). The Red Barn Subdivision site is currently vacant. The center of Mead lies to the west of the proposed Red Barn Subdivision site. Streets The primary streets in the area of the Red Barn Subdivision site are State Highway 66 (SH66), Colorado Boulevard (WCRI3), and WCR32. The existing geometry at the SH66/Colorado, Colorado-WCR13/WCR32, and East Frontage Road/ WCR32 intersections is shown in Figure 2. State Highway 66 is an east/west road, categorized as an NR -A highway by CDOT and designated as a Major Arterial on the Town of Mead Roadway Plan. Currently, SH66 has a rural two-lane cross section (no center median lane) with narrow shoulders and a speed limit of 65 mph. At the 91-166/Colorado intersection, SH66 has eastbound and westbound left -turn lanes and one through lane in each direction. The SH66/Colorado intersection has signal control. Colorado Boulevard-WCR13 is a north/south road, designated as a Major Arterial on the Town of Mead Roadway Plan. Currently, Colorado Boulevard-WCR13 has a rural two-lane cross section (no center median lane) with a speed limit of 45 mph, increasing to 55 mph 0.5 miles north of SH66. At the SH66/Colorado intersection, Colorado Boulevard has all northbound and southbound movements combined into single lanes. At the Colorado-WCR13ANCR32 intersection, Colorado Boulevard- WCR13 has all northbound and southbound movements combined into single lanes. The Colorado-WCR1 1WCR 2 intersection has stop sign control on WCR32. Weld County Road 32 is an east/west road, designated as a Minor Arterial on the Town of Mead Roadway Plan. West of Colorado Boulevard-WCR13, WCR32 currently has a paved, rural two-lane cross section (no center median lane) and a speed limit of 45 mph. East of Colorado Boulevard -W R 1 , WCR32 currently has a gravel two-lane cross section and no posted speed limit. At the Colorado-WCR13.ANCR32 intersection, WCR32 has all eastbound and westbound movements combined into single lanes. At East Frontage Road/VCRRoadNVCR32 intersection, VVCR32 has all eastbound and westbound movements combined into single lanes. The East Frontage Road/WCR32 intersection has stop sign control on WCR32, 3 rASS001ATE3 Red Barn Subdivision TIS, March 2018 Page 2 )ut: blank 6/27/2( Page 6 of 1 SCALE: `=3000' 4*AitI) sI ei ker 4,,a. ! LYti. WCR 32 Red Barn Subdivision MEAD KIGl I SCHOOL SITE LOCATION i—DELICH I— ASSOCIATES Figure 1 Red Barn Subdivision TI March 2018 Page 3 mt:hlank 6/2 7/2 ( Page 7 of 1 Denotes Lane fr4C- 17 i o r H6 6 a so cv O U EXISTING INTERSECTION GEOMETRY Figure 2 esei DELI H I—ASSOCIATES Red Barn Subdivision T1S. March 2018 Page 4 ut:blank 6/27/2( Page 8 of Existing Traffic Recent peak hour traffic volumes at the H66/Colorado, Colorado -W R 13/ WCR32, and East Frontage RoadiW R 2 intersections are shown in Figure 3. The counts at the key intersections were obtained in January 2018, Raw traffic count data is provided in Appendix B. The traffic was averaged/balanced between the H66/ Colorado and Colorado-WCR13N1lVCR 2 intersections and is shown in Figure 4. Existing Operation The H6 /Colorado, Colorado-WCR13NVCR32, and East Frontage Road/ WCR32 intersections were evaluated using techniques provided in the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual, Using the morning and afternoon peak hour traffic shown in Figure 4, the peak hour operation is shown in Table 1. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix C. The key intersections are currently operating acceptably with existing control and geometry in the morning and afternoon peak hours. Acceptable operation is defined as level of service (LOS) D or better, overall, during the peak hours, At stop sign controlled intersections, minor street left turns may operate at LOS F during the peak hours. This is considered to be normal in urban and urbanizing areas during the peak hours, A description of level of service for signalized and unsignalized intersections from the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual is also provided in Appendix C. it is important to note that based upon the existing traffic volumes, northbound and southbound left -turn and right -turn deceleration lanes are required at the H66/Colorado intersection. In addition to this, eastbound and westbound right -turn deceleration lanes are required at this intersection. At the Colorado -W R1 1W R 2 intersection, a southbound right -turn deceleration lane is required with the existing afternoon peak hour volume. At the East Frontage Road v R32 intersection, northbound and southbound left -turn lanes are required with the existing afternoon peak hour volume. The Town of Mead uses the Colorado State Highway Access Code (SHAG) for auxiliary lane evaluation. DELICH ASSOCIATES Red Barn Subthvision TISL March 2018 Page 5 )ut:blank 6/27/2( Page 9 of I N 1 re. etkr AsOel [441/4. 2/0 0 P. AM/PM WCR32 SH66 Nis 6/61 — 216 -f 6/7 —\ {cP, Yew co cD 04 CO CO Aar Amyl vi 15/130 349/621 —sops- 46/91 -, r O N e a %- PI ''**11 Cskl 03 \--14/33 Aver- 663/517 67/48 IF tie 0 c N Cel O V C� C O RECENT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 3 -j! g-DELICH Aft j -ASSOCIATES Feb Barn Subdivision TiSt March 2018 Page 6 )tit: blank 6/27/2 Page 10 of 1 "- C1/24 I 6/.3 17/7 —sac I 10/23 -e--14{ 17 r 2/0 It' +r E. Frontage Rd. AM/PM AVERAGED/BALANCED RECENT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC WC R32 SH66 C., C Dra ,#) 6/61 2/6 5/7 13/127 - 349/621 -6,- 46/91 tit e Nit ict N r 12132 663/517 T 67/48 AF CS ,h CD CD ryf r t 'is -. Vl O I Figure 4 L-DELICH cASSOCIATES Red Barn ubc�awision 'EIS, March 2018 Page 7 nit:blank 6/27/2( Page i 1 of TABLE el Current Peak Hour Operation Intersection Movement Level of Service AM PM S1166/Colorado (signal) EE LT A A A B EB T/RT B EB AP'P'F HA LT A B B W T/RT B B U' PPf C C C LT T�'1 T LT/T/RT C B B OVE1 LL Colorado- 'CR13 (stopsigri) CR32 B B EE LT T T E LT1''FT B B NEB LT { A A A A A OVERALL A A East Frontage (stopsign) Road/WCR32 EE3 LT I T A A ELI/T T NB LT A A SCE LT A A OVERALL alMIENd L—DELICH r° -ASSOCIATES Red Barn Subdivision TIS, March 2016 Page 8 nit: ha rk 6/27/21 Page 12 of 1 III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The Red Barn Subdivision is a residential development, located in the southwest quadrant of the Colorado-WCR13/WCR32 intersection in Mead 4 Figure 5 shows a site plan of the Red Barn Subdivision. The Red Barn Subdivision will consist of 446 single family dwelling units built in two phases (for traffic analysis purposes). Phase 1 will consist of 165 dwelling units and primary access to/from Colorado Boulevard via Red Barn iRoad (south access), The six large lots in the southwest quadrant of the olorade= f f - �. T intersection �\ t �� r! �\ '!r & f -y T► • - 1 M i I L • T T access T �� Ti n s _ is. r! P^. _ o � n n n via 1 �-private v V u r\ 1 JI V V L o2 i 1 Her recto r 1 y ill have access to r ro r I I V fl i via a driveway (future Hal est Moon Road) in Phase 1. When the property to the west of the Red Barn Subdivision develops, there will be a connection via Plum Way. The short range (Year 2023) future includes Phase I development of the Red Barn Subdivision and an appropriate increase in background traffic due to normal growth and other potential developments in the area, The long range analysis (Year 2040) includes full development of the Red Barn Subdivision and is in general accordance with the Mead Comprehensive Plan. Trip Generation Trip generation is important in considering the impact of a development such as this upon the existing and proposed street system. A compilation of trip generation information contain in Trip Generation, le Edition. 1TE was used to estimate the trips that would be generated by the proposed/expected uses at the Red Barn Subdivision site. A trip is defined as a one-way vehicle movement from origin to destination, Table 2 shows the expected trip generation on a daily and peak hour basis for furl development of Red Barn Subdivision. The total development trip generation was calculated using the equations from Code 210 — Single Family Detached from the cited reference, Phase 1 development of the Red Barn Subdivision will generated' , 522 daily trip ends, 119 morning peak hour trip ends, and 158 afternoon peak hour trip ends. Full development will generate 4,114 daily trip ends, 321 morning peak hour trip ends, and 427 afternoon peak hour trip ends, TABLE 2 Trip Generation AWDTE 1 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Code Use Size r Rate Trips Hata' In I Rata I Out Rata In Rata I Out Phase 1 210 r Single Family Delacherl 157 1) ti FO 14112 EQ 27 F r 87 Ye FO 92 FO 54 210 L Estate Lots 13dLJ E 120 EQ EQ EQ CO4 Subtotal 165 D 1522 100 Phase 2 210 Single Family Detached 281 D LJ EQ 2592 EU 50 EQ 152 El 169 EQ 100 446 DIP . 4114 80 241 4 269 158 Total , --1 1--DELICH �► ASSOCIATES Red Barn Subdivision TIS. March 2018 Page 9 A t:blank 6/27/2( Page 13 of 1 CR 32 (100' ROW) n u II n r, i 1 L._ S — S a, : a a s • • I I 1 it a will ki,rt1 i a C .Weibillappe low as r ,.- a - I f. • Ilielbaaftibmp y� ,r aIW a w IS' LIE ▪ _mos•i Mina R Pa, a s a s , = a a Gas 4 L Na — a ▪ — S r air I SITE PLAN AS SS i 1 As". as. aliS--nnanit ✓ a- ,i _ _.,, • , r FIR,ioy Hr SCALE: I '-400 I i 4- ell i° 44 re" i U. Ii. 9: /arias It 44 - s:- a - PHASE 1 Figure 5 1-DELICH � rASSOCIATES Red Barn Subdivision TIS1 March 2018 Page 10 co c2 f a nut:blank 6/27/2( Page 14 of Trip Distribution Trip distribution for the Red Barn Subdivision was based on existing/future travel patterns, land uses in the area, consideration of trip attractions/productions in the area, and engineering judgment. Figure 6 shows the trip distribution for the short range (2n73) and long rnnne (7040) iniIvsiq mums. ThP trip rlistrihntinn of the i r$i iriii � r - . � . w . . . . . - - . . . . . trip Y . Y' ti . . Y Y 7. .� . • 7 . . 'Y T . • i!1 . T . .�1 .!1 1 movements at the various intersections is displayed in the trip assignment figures, Background Traffic Projections Figures 7 and 8 respectively show the short range (2023) and long range (2040) background traffic projections. Background traffic projections for the short range (2023) and long range (2040) future horizons were obtained by reviewing the Mead Comprehensive Plan, CDOT 20 -year factors, the North Front Range Regional Transportation Plan, and various traffic studies prepared for this area of Mead. The CDOT 20 -year factor for SH66, west of Colorado Boulevard, is 1.56. East of Colorado Boulevard, the CDOT 20 -year factor is 1.58. Traffic volumes on Colorado Boulevard - 1 R 13, WCR32, and the East Frontage Road were increased by approximately two percent per year. In the long range (2040) futures development of vacant land adjacent to WCR32 was assumed, Trip Assignment/Total Traffic Trip assignment is how the generated and distributed trips are expected to be loaded on the street system, The assigned trips are the resultant of the trip distribution process. Figures 9 and 10 respectively show the Phase 1 (2023) and Full Development peak hour trip assignment of the site generated traffic. Figures 9 and 10 also show the trip distribution for the individual movements at the various study intersections, Figures 11 and 12 respectively show the short range (2023) and long range (2040) total (site plus background) peak hour traffic at the BI-166/Colorado, Colorado/Red Barn, Colorado/ Harvest Moon, Colorado-Wc 131W0 3 , WCR32/Harvest Moon, and East Frontage Road/WR32 intersections, Signal Warrants As a matter of policy, traffic signals are not installed at any location unless warrants are met according to the l° anua1 an Uniform Traffic control Devices. The H66/Colorado intersection is currently signalized. For the roads in the vicinity of the Red Barn Subdivision, four hour and/or eight hour signal warrants are applicable. These warrants require much data and are applied when the traffic is actually on the area road system. It is acknowledged that peak hour signal warrants should not be applied, but since the peak hour forecasts are readily available in a traffic impact study, it is reasonable to use them to estimate whether other signal warrants may be met. If peak hour signal warrants will not 1_-,DELIH ASSOCIATES Red Barn Subthvision TIS, March 2018 Page 11 )ut:blank 6/27/2( /2 Page 15 of SCALE: 1"=2000' TRIP DISTRIBUTION Figure 6 au.—, ° 1-.—DELIC H v rASSOC1ATES Red Barn Subdivision 118, March 2018 Page 12 mat:blank 6/27/2( Page 16 of I Aes O er) oivU com 0, 11% of 0/ O 19/8 - 11/10 E. Frontage Rd. AM/PM WCR32 SH66 r oma -f 2/6 — 6/B —sat 1,44 N. 4O In r co r o vil 4:0 r 15/145 398/708 -sr- 52/103 41/44444 Cr2 O N r 13/37 -+- 760/592 77/55 a O O t i SHORT RANGE (2023) BACKGROUND PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 7 DELI H r ---.ASSOCIATES Red Barn Subdivision ITS March 2018 Page 13 nit:blank lan k 6/27/2 Page 17 of l U) �ma Se r� 10/5 ris 36/20 15/15 50/60 -a- 35/35 r 70/50 '*-0 0 U, E. Frontage Rd_ r re) 0 - AM/PM Rounded to Nearest 5 Vehicles 0 cc ED 0 r� t 160/140 sHss 25/225 ,! 575/1020 -bp- 75/150 -Th1/4 \--40/120 vie- 1105/860 r 110180 0 0 0 OD N it CO a 8 It 0 r N C •O m O O LONG RANGE (2040) BACKGROUND PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 8 —doe I—DELICH air r ASSOCIATES Red Barn Subdivision TIS, March 2018 Page 14 )Ltt:blank 6/27/2( Page 18off'1 0 r 0 r fl l . RC%y r -r-- 9/5 (10%) ...0--- 2/1 (2,5%) E. Frontage Rd ingss— 10/6 (11.5%) 112 (2.5%) 0832 AM/PM (trip distribution) 31'111 01 tulip (1%)Th fir I 1/1 (1%) 1 4/12 (13%)un t'ti1 Red Barn { 27/17 (29.5%) 59/39 (67%) 1141/4 S to r ,.r C) C,, r 0 est tJ SH+ 10/33 (32.5%) era ix U Ns in" r f u� O 1D 9 O C N 7/20 (20%) PHASE 1 (2023) SITE GENERATED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 9 adi LDELICH -7► jr—ASSOCIATES Red Barn Subdivision 115, March 2018 Page 15 mit :blank 6/27/2( Page 19 of 1 0 N CD 1/6 (2.5%) —a-- 24/16 (10%) it 6/4 (2.5%) WCR32 114 (1.5 ) —AP-- 10/36(135%)—x, O 175 AM/PM (trip distribution) CD al --- 2/2 (1.5%) 9/28 (10%) 20/13 (8.5%) 52/ (21.5%) —� tt ir- Red Barn 17/1 (7%) 95/62 (39.5%) SH66 24/81 (30%) en cv2 1 N ale e to it Tr in 1 - Lin 1 } en r 0 CJ et Nit to tin are c1/44 o 17/54 (20%) Colorado 12/40 (15%%%) FULL DEVELOPMENT SITE GENERATED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 10 i—DELICH r -ASSOCIATES Red Barn Subdivision TIS, March 2018 Page 16 mt.: blank 6/27/2( Page 20 of l Cr) CO C4 I b/3 _ 19/10 --s- 111/10 laankC 20/30 -s- 18/20 2/0 iwthe E. Frontage Rd. AM/PM WCR32 "ai 62/24 1/2 I I O Red Barn I' 000) A•1/4 I 7/69 _ 2/6 seas 10/20 41/4 r O cO 27/17 59/39 a) f;ja 8 r ,ALL SH66 25/178 398/708 —sw- 52J1d3 en cc 5 N 0/1 1/5 1/3 1 U, IF COr CO N IN- CV CNt r r 20/57 -+— 760/592 77/55 i Lt3 to P1 a 0 0 0 O fir 0 it SHORT RANGE (2023) TOTAL PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 11 � LQELICH 7 in ASSOCIATES Red Barn Subdivision T1S March 2018 Page 17 )tit: blank 6/27/2( Page 21 oft I0 Le) 10/5 35/25 15/15 -N a) 75/75 -�- 40/40 70/50 f re %it Ns to u' a co) 0, AM/PM Rounded to Nearest 5 Vehicles WCR32 200/240 es 10/35 — 140/225 10/30 I C 0 to In ‘14— 5/5 T 5/5 5/5 1 Harvest Moon20/15 '' .4*1 t 55/35 of ko to cp cJ 0 c+) 04 t Chsil tO Red Barn --it `�., 1 15110 95/60 NI 1 r vs - 4.1 195/165 SH 66 50/300 575/1020 —4s- 75/150 Lo u, O r r co a n Cr) -- 60/180 ..,. 1105/860 110/80 O O O 1501260 -Is-- re 0 LONG RANGE (2040) TOTAL PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 12 L- DELI H I-- ASSOCIATES Red Barn Subdivision TIS, March 2018 Page 18 )ut:blank 6/27/2( Page 22 of] be met at a given intersection, it is reasonable to conclude that it is not likely that other signal warrants would be met. If peak hour signal warrants are met, it merely indicates that further evaluation should occur in the future as the development occurs. However, a judgment can be made that some intersections will likely meet other signal warrants. Signal warrants were evaluated at the Colorado-WCR13NVCR32 intersection. Using the long range (2040) background traffic forecasts (Figure 8), peak hour signal warrants will be met in the afternoon peak hour. Using the long range (2040) total traffic fnrerasts(Figurpif pP ni it sign rrnntc 4!I him mint in hnth the mnrging and • - • - - -- - • :• • • �•• : • ■ e f .• ■ , . ■ �■ -- . ' .RZ r\rt ■ ' the ■ ■ ■■ ■ U owl afternoon peak hours. Peak hour signal warrants are provided in Appendix D. It ■■is not likely that the four-hour or eight -hour signal warrants will be met at this intersection. Geometry Figures 13 and 14 respectively show a schematic of the short range (2023) and long range (2040) intersection georetry. As was mentioned with the existing traffic volumes, northbound and southbound left -turn and right -turn deceleration lanes are required at the H66/Colorado intersection. In addition to this, eastbound and westbound right -turn deceleration lanes are required at this intersection • At the Colo rado- WCR 13 VCR32 intersection, a southbound right -turn deceleration lane is required with the existing afternoon peak hour volume. At the East Frontage RoadNVCR32 intersection, northbound and southbound left -turn lanes are required with the existing afternoon peak hour volume. Based upon the short range (2023) traffic with Phase I of the Red Barn Subdivision, a northbound left -turn deceleration lane is required at the Colorado- l R13/ WCR32 intersection. A northbound left -turn deceleration lane is also required at the Colorado/Red Barn intersection. All other required lanes were warranted with the existing traffic volumes. Operation Analysis Operational analyses were performed at the H66/Colorado, Colorado/Red Barn, Colorado/Harvest Moon, Colorado- R1 / CR 2, WCR32/Harvest Moon, and East Frontage RoadtW c R32 intersections. The operations analyses were conducted for the short range future, reflecting a year 2023 condition, and long range future, reflecting a year 2040 condition. Table 3 shows the short range (2023) background peak hour operation at the SH66/Colorado, Colorado -VV R1 /WR3 , and East Frontage RoadNVCR32 intersections. The key intersections operate at acceptable levels of service in both peak hours with existing control and geometry. Therefore, the key intersections will also operate acceptably with the required auxiliary lanes. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix E. DELICH C H Red Barn Subdivision TIS. March 2016 ASSOCIATES Page 19 )ut:blank 6/27/2( Page 23 of I Warranted with Existing volumes Red Barn - a Existing Lane aiso --- - - - Required Lane Warranted with Existing volumes SHORT RANGE (2023) GEOMETRY N Figure 13 f -P ASSOCIATES Red Barn Subdivision TI8, March 2018 Page 20 mt:blank 6/27/2( Page 24 of 1 E. Frontage Rd. Existing Lane - Required Lane WCRS2 Barnyard Red Barn SH66 i N -Nt C to L 2 O O LONG RANGE (2040) GEOMETRY Figure 14 ��DELICH v faASSOCIATES Red Barn Subdivision TIS0 March 2018 Page 21 at:blank 6/27/2( Page 25 of 1 TABLE 3 Short Range (2023) Background Peak Hour Operation IntersectionMovement Level of Service AM PM SH66/Colorado (signal) {existing geometry) EB LT A A EB T/RT B C EB APPROACH B C WB LT A B W8 TART B B WB APPROACH B B C C N8 LT/T/RT SB LTITJRT C C OVERALL B C Colorado-WCR1 3/WCR32 (stop sign) EB LT/PRT 6 B WB LTITIRT B B NB LT A A SB LT A A OVERALL A A EB IsT/T/RT B A WB LT/T/RT A B East Frontage RoadMiCR32 (stop sign)SB NB LT A A A A L7 OVERALL A A "TDE L.I H Red Barn Subdivision TES, March 2018 1ASS0C1A1ES Page 22 n it: b l nk 6/27/2( Page 26 of l Using the long range (2040) background traffic (Figure 8), the SH66/Colorado, Colorado-WCR13NVCR32, and East Frontage Road/ WCR32 intersections operate as indicated in Table 4. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix F, The key intersections will operate acceptably with recommended control and geometry, Table 5 shows the short range (2023) total peak hour operation at the SH66/ Colorado, Colorado/Red Barn, Colorado- 'CR13/WCR32, WCR32/Driveway, and East Frontage Road/WCR32 intersections. The key intersections operate at acceptable levels of service in both peak hours with the existing geometry and the required geometry. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix G. Using the long range (2040) total traffic volumes shown in Figure 12 and recommended control and geometrics, the SH66/Colorado, Colorado/Red Barn, Colorado/Harvest Moon, Colorado-WCR13/WCR32, /WCR 2, WCR32/harvest Moon, and East Frontage Road/WCR32 intersections will operate as indicated in Table 6. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix H. All key intersections will operate acceptably with recommended control and geometrics. Queuing and Site Circulation For analysis purposes, Colorado BoulevardANCR13 is assumed to be categorized as an NR -B roadway according to the State Highway Access Code (SHAC). Using the long range (2040) traffic forecasts and the SHAC, the north leg of the SH66/Colorado intersection will require a southbound left -turn lane of approximately 435 feet (taper @ 13.51) at 45 mph. This intersection will also require a southbound right -turn lane of approximately 435 feet (taper @ 13.5:1). The calculated queue length of the southbound left -turn lane is approximately 150 feet.. However. the SYNCHRO analysis shows that in the morning peak hour, the "95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles," If no geometric improvements are made to the north leg in the short range (2023) future, the southbound calculated queue length is approximately 382 feet with "gym percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles." The required northbound left -turn lanes at the Colorado/Red Barn and Colorado/Harvest Moon intersections should be approximately 435 feet long (taper 13.5:1) at 45 mph. The long range (2040) calculated queue length of the northbound left -turn lane approaching Red Barn and Harvest Moon is less than one vehicle. The calculated queue length for the left -turn lanes on Red Barn Road and Harvest Moon Road is less than one vehicle, The required northbound left -turn lane at the Colorado-WCR13/WCR32 intersection should be approximately 435 feet long {taper @ 13,5:1) at 45 mph. The long range (2040) calculated queue length of the northbound left -turn lane approaching WCR32 is less than one vehicle. The calculated queue length for the eastbound left - turn lane on WCR32 is six vehicles (approximately 140 feet). DELICH ASSOCIATES Red Barn Subdivision TIE.. March 2018 Page 23 nit:hiank /27/2( Page 27 of I TABLE 4 Long Range (2040) Background Peak Hour Operation Intersection Movement ment Level of Service AM PM BH (signal) / olo rado EB LT B B EB T B B A B EBRT EB APPROACH B B WB LT A I B WB T B B WB RT A A WB APPROACH B B NB LT B B NB T NB RT +B A NB APPROACH BB LT C B C BB T Sa RT A A BB APPROACH C C B B OVERALL C E Colorado-WCR13ANCR32WB (stop sign) EB LT EB T/RT B B EB APPROACH B D B LT7`/RT NB LT A A BB LT A A OVERALL A A East Frontage Road1WCR32 EB LTf'/FAT B B B B 1 B LT "f /RT A A NB LT (stop sign) BB LT A A OVERALL A A ._... DELICH � -ASSOCIATES Red Barn Subdivision PS, March 2018 Page 24 mat:blank 6/27/21 Page 28 of I TABLE 5 Shod Range (2023) Total Peak Hour Operation Intersection Movement Level of Service AM PM SH66/Colorado toirin01 \J„UI ItAI) (existing geometry) EB LT B B FR at/FAT EB APPROACH B WB LT t i D TierTLAP WB APPROACH NB LT/TIRT BB LT/TIME D C OVERALL SH66/Colorado (signal) (with NB & SB LT lanes) EB LT B B ES T/RT B C EB APPROACH B C WB LT B WB T/RT WB APPROACH B EB LT EB T/iT C EB APPROACH WB LT C C WB T/RT C WB APPROACH C OVERALL B SH66/Colorado (signal) (full required geometry) DEB LT A EB T A EBRT EB APPROACH A WB LT A ' BT B WB RT A C A WB APPROACH B B NB LT C C NB T C C NB RT C A NB APPROACH C C BB LT C C B T C C BB RT A A SB APPROACH C C OVERALL Continued on next page t°---tJ E L I H 7t• cASSO01ATES Red Barn Subdivision T1B. March 2018 Page 25 Ault: lank 6/27/2( Page 29 of 1 Continued from previous page TABLE 5 Short Range (2023) Total Peak Hour Operation Intersection Movement I Level of Service AM PM EB LT/FAT l B B Colorado/Red (stop sign) Barn SIB LT A A OVERALL Colorado -W R I/W (stop sign) (NBLTIane) R L EB LT/ITT B B WB LTTI/RT B B NB LT A A B B LT A A OVERALL A A Colorado-RWCR13ANCR32 (stop sign) (NBLTiane&SBRflane) EB L IPRT B B WB LT/T/RT B B v NB LT A A BB LT A A OVERALL A A `R32/Driveway (stop sign) NB LT/RT A A WB LT A A OVERALL A A East Frontage (stop sign) (existing geometry) RoadANCR32 E B LTF'T RT B B r WB LT'T/RT A B NB LT A A BB LT A A OVERALL A A East Frontage RoadNVCR32 EB LTI I"/RT B B WB LT/T/RT A B (stop sign) (NB&SBLTIanes) NB LT A _ _ A BB LT A A OVERALL A A rASSOCIATES Red Barn Subdivision TI- , March 2018 Page 26 )ut;blank 6/27/2( Page 30 of I TABLE Long Range (2040) Total 6 Peak Hour Operation Intersection Movement Level of Service AM PM B H66/ oIorad+ (s�gnal) E E LT EB T B . A B EBRT EB APPROACH B C WB► LT A B WBT B A B BFT WBB APPROACH! B NB LT B B C NB I NBRT C A NB APPROACH BB LT H B BBT SB RT A A BED APPROACH OVERALL B Colorado/Red Barn (stop sign) B E EB LT/RT NB LT A A OVERALL A A Colorado/Harvest (stop sign) Moon EB LT/RT B B NB LT A A A A OVERALL Cc Iorado-' R 1 'V R (stopsign) EBLT C F B B EB TAT EB APPROACH B E 'I B LTl'T/RT B NB LT A A BB LT OVERALL A B WCR32/1-larvest Moon (stop in NB LTRT B B A WB LT OVERALL A A East Frontage RoadNVCR32 (stop sign) B B E B LTT RT B WB LTIT/RT NB LT A A BB LT A OVERALL A _A �► j —ASSOCIATES Red Barn Subdivis on TI , March 2018 Page 27 )ut:blank. 6/27/2( Page 31 of The required westbound left -turn lane at the WCR32/Harvest Moon intersection should be approximately 435 feet long (taper @ 13.51) at 45 mph. The calculated queue length of the northbound left -turn lane on Harvest Moon Road approaching WCR32 is less than one vehicle. The required northbound and southbound left -turn lanes at the East Frontage Road W R32 intersection should be approximately 435 feet long (taper @ 13.51) at 45 mph. The long range (2040) calculated queue length of the northbound and southbound left -turn lanes approaching WCR32 is less than one vehicle. The calculated queue length for the east leg on WCR32 approaching the East Frontage Road is two vehicles (approximately 50 feet). Red Barn Road and Harvest Moon Road are the minor collector streets through the Red Barn Subdivision. There will be a connection to the property to the west (Plum Way) with full development of the site. Pedestrian/Bicycle Facilities It is assumed that there will be pedestrian facilities (sidewalks/paths) along a l l streets within the Red Barn Subdivision. These facilities will provide safe pedestrian areas within the Red Barn Subdivision. Currently, there is a lack of sidewalks in the area. There are no sidewalks along any of the roads in the vicinity of the Red Barn Subdivision. As Mead becomes more urban in the future, it is expected that there will be sidewalks along the existing and future streets. Most of the streets within the Red Barn Subdivision development are considered to be local streets. Therefore} defined bike lanes are not required. There are narrow shoulders along 8H66, Colorado Boulevard-WCR13 and WCR32. As exterior streets are improved, bike lanes should be incorporated into the cross sections per Mead Street Standards. DELICH ASSOCIATES Red Barn Subdivision TIS, March 2018 Page 28 )rat: blank 6/27/2( Page 32 of 1 IV. CONCLUSIONS This study assessed the impacts of the Red Barn Subdivision development on the street system in the short range (2023) and long range (2040) futures. As a result of this analysis, the following is concluded: The Red Barn Subdivision development is feasible from a traffic engineering standpoint. Phase 1 development of the Red Barn Subdivision will generate 1,522 daily trip ends, 119 morning peak hour trip ends, and 158 afternoon peak hour trip ends. Full development will generate 4,114 daily trip ends, 321 morning peak hour trip ends, and 427 afternoon peak hour trip ends. Currently, the H66/Colorado,Colorado-WCR1 1 cR32, and East Frontage Road/WCR32 2 intersections operate acceptably with existing control and geometry. It is important to note that based upon the existing traffic volumes, northbound and southbound left -turn and right -turn deceleration lanes are required at the i 66/ Colorado intersection. In addition to this, eastbound and westbound right -turn deceleration lanes are required at this intersection. At the Colorado-WCRI 3/ WCR32 intersection, a southbound right -turn deceleration lane is required with the existing afternoon peak hour volume. At the East Frontage Road/WC R3 intersection, northbound and southbound left -turn lanes are required with the existing afternoon peak hour volume. The Town of Mead uses the Colorado State Highway Access Code (SHAG) for auxiliary lane evaluation. Using the long range (2040) background traffic forecasts, peak hour signal warrants will be met in the afternoon peak hour. Using the long range (2040) total traffic forecasts, peak hour signal warrants will be met in both the morning and afternoon peak hours. It is not likely that the four-hour or eight -hour signal warrants will be met at this intersection. In the short range (2023) future, given development of the Red Barn Subdivision and an increase in background traffic, the key intersections will operate acceptably with the existing geometry and the required geometry. In the long range (2040) future, given full development of the Red Barn Subdivision and an increase in background traffic, the key intersections will operate acceptably with the recommended geometry and control. The short range (2023) and long range (2040) geometry is shown in Figures 13 and 141 respectively. Based upon the short range (2023) traffic with Phase 1 of the Red Barn Subdivision, a northbound left -turn deceleration lane is required at the Colorado-WCR13NVCR32 intersection. A northbound left -turn deceleration lane is also required at the Colorado/Red Barn intersection. All other required lanes were warranted with the existing traffic volumes. DELICH ASSOCIATES Red Barn Subtvisjon TI5, March 2018 Page 29 )gut: blank 6/27/2( Page 33 of I APPENDIX A ) ut: blank 6/27/2( Page 34 of 1 Subject: RE: Red Barn Subdivision TIS Scoping Packet From: Kari McDowell Schroeder ckari@mcdowelleng.com> Date: 2/12/2018 10:06 AM To: "Michael R Delich" cm ich ael@de lichassoc. com> Michael, This looks good. I had a few comments. 1. Be sure to include any other phased analysis if tree developer wants to construct phased/incremental infrastructure improvements. 2. Determine the percent of traffic impact on the north leg of WCR 13 at SH 66 to determine if a revised State Highway Access Permit is required. 3. Include a figure with the directional distribution by movement. 4. Review the anticipated queues and impacts to site circulation. Specifically Red Barn Way & CR 13, Barnyard Way & CR 13, Barnyard Way & CR 32 5, Provide for future connectivity for the parcel to the west. Tract B? Thanks, Ka ri From: Michael R Delich [mailto:mfi-lich_iel@cieiicf 5O,C.CQ) ] Sent: Tuesday, February B, 2018 8t55 AM To: Kari McDowell Schroeder <Ica!i @incdpwej eng.c.pr)i> Subject: Red Barn Subdivision TIS Sopping Packet Kari- Attached is the scoping packet for the Red Barn Subdivision Traffic Impact Study. The development will total 446 single family dwelling units. I used the equations from Trip Generationtlath Edition, ITE. The plan is to initially build 159 D.U. that will have access to/from WCR13 (Colorado Blvd.- via Red Barn Way (south access). There are six large lots in the SW quadrant of the Colorado/WCR32 intersection that will initially have a driveway to access WC 32 This driveway will eventually become Barnyard Way with subsequent phases of development. The year of full build -out of the Red Barn Subdivision is unknown and subject to market conditions. Therefore, we are including full build -out in the long range (2040) future. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments. Thank you Michael Delich )art: blank 6/27/2( Page 35 of I McDowell Engineering Traffic Study Scoping Form FNJ(I N1 I. RI GS, f•.'41l .. 1i 1,. -PI* Contact Information Consultant Name: Delich Associates Tele: 970-669-2061 michaeI@d'elichassoc.com E-mail: Developer/Owner Name Rocky Ridge Civil Engineering Project information (Attach proposed site plane ) Project Name: Red Barn Subdivision Project Location: I SW Quadrant Colorado (WCR13)/WCR32 Project Description: Application type (rezoning, �adivision). acreage, new or re -development,. etc Zoned (Colorado intersection R4 -198 Blvd.} will acres. Phase 1 will via Red Barn Way. have access via a consist of Six D L). in driveway (future 165 D.U. and the SW quadrant Barnyard have access to/from WCR13 of the Colorado/WCR32 Way) ExiSting/ Proposed Land Uses ITE Code fturrits or Size Existing/ Proposed Land Uses ITE Code #units or Size ` Existing / Proposed Land Uses ITE Code iunits or Size Single Family 210 446 D.U. Please attach Trip Generation Summary table far forge or mixed use projects. Assumptions Study Horizons Buildout Year: 2023 (Phase 1) Long Term Year: 204O Current Year: 2018 Study Area0oundaries (Attach map if needed.) North: WCR32 'South: SH66 West: East Frontage Road East: Colorado Boulevard (WCR13) intersections to be Evaluated (Attach map if needed.) 11 All site entrances 7. I. Colorado/WCR32 3. WCR32/E. Frontage Rd, 4, 9166/Colorado 9 , 1.O. Trip Distribution See attached sketch. Trip Reductions' Internal Capture Use: o Use . °�`o Pass By Use. Use d 'include;, Trip Generation table rip! °video. Submit calculations based upon lTE's Trip Generation Handbook loge1of2 ut: blank 6/27/2( Page 36 of ] McDowell Engineering Traffic Study Scoping Form Assumptions (continued) Anticipated Traffic Growth (Describe methodology.) Future `CDOT Rates 20 -year WCR13) = 1.58 WCR13) = 1.56 296/year on aPI factor on SHGG (east 0f i SI-466 (west of other roads Study Time Periods (Check all that21 ciPPIY.) P AM (7-91 PM pro SAT (noon) ❑ Other: Other Factors (Proposed/assumed transportation improvements, other studies, nearby proposed devclupnwnts, etc) Issues (Check Analysis Methods & all that apply.) 0 Synchra ❑ HCS ■ aasid ra or Rode' ffir Intersections ❑ Roadway Sections IA'' Signal Warrants Sa fe ty/Sight Distance r Queuing &Storage r4 CDOT (Access Permit, etc.) Identify Bicycle, Pedestrian & Transit Accomodatiors I l TOM ❑ Neighborhood Impacts El Other: Attachments, Notes, & Other Assumptions: Signed: (Applicant or Consuitar Print Name: Michael Delicti (Delict7 Associates) (Applicant or Consultant) Date: February 6, 2018 Review Agency: Department: Signed: Print Name. Date: Page 2of2 )ut;blank 6/27/2( S $4, TOT Et St I L' salr - i s. at a ,IA'�li4 a l -liter - i difi 0 9 [k ,yam r Pr Wt Y. ate• ..�._ - l ti." V -t#1 -V 1, al D A. I ' R i • �$,DI ♦ X1,1_ 1, V p. .r I.• .,. • • • •Phiffill 5 • • a ;$40 Ai i %S 1 % V 4_ 1 ,eV I it 'Nadi w If / ,. a a sr — e ■ • S SITE PLAN if. a F. i • ASSOCIATES PHASE a SCALE: 1 "-74OO' ._,DELI CH - •a PHASE 5 .,. 1 0 el. tn•. y. -lit -n'l # I �, 0 'm z- • zz "F—w'r t+++•.� 4 Tr -iris zvris • innerti z•4M • ..- l C' F. «.,. .1.. Kid % nab. iss - PHASE 1 S ■, t - eiv A e ti tl''A SV3 2 Figure 5 Red Barn SubdrvIsion TIS, February 2018 Page 10 Page 37 of I "Si p Tt CO f11 ,z rrt crs) O ft m jj F )ut:blank 6/27/2( r Page 38 of 1 MEAD vvelkri Ave_ M HIGH SCHOOL. SCALE: 1"=30OO' SITE LOCATION ;ArR 34 WCR 32 Red Barn Subdivision Figure 1 L.DELICH -7 is ASSOCIATES Red Barn Subdivision u1S, February 2018 Page 3 )ut:blank 6/27/2( Page 39 of 1 TABLE 2 Trip Generation Cede Size AWDTE PM Pea" Hour AM Peak Hour l� ra Rs mps Rita I In fRate 1 Out Raw 1 In I Rata Phase 1 152 D.U. EC 1402 EQ I 27 EQ 82 EQ 92 EQ 54 210 Single Family Detached 210 Estate Lots 13 WI , Ea 120 EQ 3 EQ 7 EQ 8 ED 4 165 D.U. 1522 30 89 100 58 Subtotal Phase 2 _ 210 EQ 1 12592 EQ 50 EQ l 152 EQ 169 EQ 100 Sirs le Famii Detached 281 C ,t..l _ 1 - R A t - 80 -k r 269 I s 158 241 Total 446 D.U. 14114 ntit:lank 6/27/2( Page 40 of 1 1. 10% 1 NOM lert O CC U 1 CRS2 2.5% T 66 v 30% Fere 0% f NOM 20% t E 3 C 0 l 15% SCALE: r=2000' TRIP DISTRIBUTION Figure 6 angie L_DELICH j -ASSOCIATES Red Barn Subdivision TIS, February 2018 Page 3 )ut:btank 6/27/2( Page 41ofl APPENDIX B )ut:blank 6/27/2( DELICH ASSOCIATES 2272 GLEN HAVEN DRIVE LOVELAND, CO RO538 PhnnP_ (97III Mh9-2O61 Page 42 of 1 R a Oghu lLsn S • Slld$yhl t i111 trill TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS Dalc: 1!31/2018 Observer: Vickie Wednesday, Mead/Weld County Intersection: SH66/Colorado i Time Beufns Northbound: Colorado"SOW Total nortF?suulh Easlbuund SHb6 Wes' bound: 5H66 hbow'd Co aradc Talal east/wost Total AU L S R Total L S R Toldl 'Iola' L S Ei rolal L 5 i R I 7:OO i 1R ;?H 52 12 I1 I. 5 31 83 I 3 1i 15— 1fi7 175 273 356 I:15 20 �,� 63 15 17 4 366 101 2 117 in 130 19 167 5 191 3 4 2 - 7,30 25 ,� 57 23 21 11 55 112 5 85 ? 97 16 172 ' 3 191 288 I 40Q 7:45 n 30 21 64 19 8 8 35 9.9 ` 5 a8 1:? 1 I a :° � 1 - 1 371 272 L 8:00 7 12 19 40 1 in 3.2 72 - 1 67 15 89 21 12. 150 239 -111 a 13 i J . 4I i ? i1 MI Mal 14 1111 if 86 I 134 2W !b I 6:30 4 :, 29 H 14 4 r 3? 61 6 63 5 14 6 99 5 102 176 H 737 8:45 a 1 I 30 �? Ci fa 25 r i 61 8 73 10 79 3 97 165 22U 7:OQ•8:O1) 26 93 119 238 I b'9 60 22 157 395a 15 349 81 583 i.t No 1154 46 410 1549 PHF D 93 O 78 0 79 U.92 1amTnrooiI O 71 O B8 10751070 O 72 1 O 74 O 43 0 95 0 58 0 97 D 9 X192 4:OO 15 ;11 1? SI 76 25 I33 2r. 181 3 104 I 285 361 8 93 r ' I 25 4:15 20 35 lb 11 '97 24 I i39 29 I 192 6 I£I1 109 301 348 =1 26 4:30 9 7tS 12 - .; 47 111 78 31 i 155 1'a I 17 124 4 1+ a 437 719 x:45 12 .� T 51 r v i 1 29 x11 30128 179 11 13B 10 ll . 3 T 421 5:0O 18 37 17 77 in - 29 101 39 1 Lej I .j 246 12 132 I 1 155 -- 401 s[]2 5:15 11 29 V ■ 13 r 26 33 3O PSI I I t98 10 123 6 141 339 422 57 5:30 1:1 32 IB 64 '� i;', a; 211 92 '4 I' 135 1b 185 19 1?7 13 159 344 436 C 5 4J -� 1 t7 u in - ,1 i� # 28 I 5-'. I. �� a 12 in 171 i F---------- Ii2 l iv = d i 40 • 311 2 l 4;305:30 .50 118 59 227 14 _4 33 115 342 130 621 I 91 842 48 511 33 590 1440 170.2 PHF 069 08 087 0.19 O88 001 083 O93 O85 O83 O83 O69 O86 QB6 O94 O75 O92 _ 09 389 )ur:Nank 6/ -)7P1 Page 43 of 1 OELrCH' ASSOCIATES 22)2 GLEN HAVEN DRIVE LOVE LAND, OO 80538 Phcc',c +;9791 69-20551 TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS R } Date: 1x31/2018 D. y Wednesday i _ Observer: Mary Jurisdiction MeadANeld County Intersection: WCR13iWCR32 i Time Booins Southbound: WOW 3 Total north/south I Eastbound; WNCR32 Westbound: WCR32 Total eustiv�rst Tara) l�II Wurllibaurici: WCtk13 L S R Total L S R lolal L S R Total. L S R lolal 0 --, 18 0 ' 18 - 0 — r 48 r 7 55 — 73 I 0 1 2 a n ,v a 2 75 7:0-[; 7:15 1 21 0 25 1 E_74 S 2 71 .+ 91 s U 0 0 o [1 1 0 0 97 3 a 0 :.9 0 29 �.. 0 a 4 50 to 89 2 k. r .Q �- - - -5 - 94 7:45 I 2 I 11 1 14 1 51 13 _ 68 82 3 i 2 3 - 8 1 I 0 (1 1 9 3:00 17 1 20 ( 30 3, V 53 2 [I 1 3 0 2 0 2 5 8:15 1 11 0 r 15 : I 20 2' ,. - 23 0 0 1 1 0 B 7 0 1 39l 313 8:30 2 21 ;,23 I 2 a alp - 4 I 3� 59 I I/. I 64 I 2 I 2 5 4 0 0 o- 8:45 1 17 I 19 I 24 2- 27 44 1 0 1 2 r 1 1 Ll _ 2 4 SO 3 82 Y 86 2 211 42 255 341 6 _2 _6 14 .-_1_ ' a 2 16 357 7:40-8;00 PHF 0 30 0 71 ,I 0 25 014 05 009 001 0 89 0 88 0 5 0 25 0 5 0.44 0 25 0 25 nix U 5 0 44 0 92 4:00 I ii5 I 1 I 47 I _26 28 75 1.0 l '�� j 1 11 1 I 0 13 liti 2 4:15 2 00 I 55 0 21 0 21 16 14 I 15 r] I 0 1 16 9 2 4:34 1 51 0 32 1 35 86 11 P 1 14 0 3 0 3 17 1O.3 4:45 rl 57 t I' 58 0 23 21 8 I liti 2 I 2 0 3 23 1- 0S tro, 5:00 3 I 7 i 0 so 1 za —'a = 31 111 12 3 7 0 x--20 15 ! 0 1 11 , 128 2 5:15 a 56 0 23 '1 24 }l{) 19 2 I L 25 0 0 1 2f► 11}6 5:3C1 l7 Z6 1 ,27 1 l ' n r i * 15 i 1 0 I 1 16 913: 82 5:45 f -18 I 51 1 24 2 27 7 fi 13 1 ` 16 ' ! 20 98 4 1:30-510 4 240 Ii 245 1 106 1 114 359 61 1 6 I 7 1 74 3 5 1 9 8"3 142 Pi -IF 0 33 0 7R 0.25 0 77 0 25 0 83 0 50 0 01 0.51 o B 0 5 0 44 0.74 035 0.42 0.25 0 75 0 8 0 06 }llt:blank 6/27/21 Page 44 of 1 DIITLICUASSOC1ArES 2272 GLEN HAVEN DRIVE LOVE LAND, CO 80538 Rhone 97 69-20 1. TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS R ilyhlloth S ctighl l 101kin Dale: 113112018 Observer: KarEn Dad': 'Wellness: Jurisdiction. Mead/Weld County Intersection: East Frontage Read/WCR32 i Begins Time -NNorthbound- E Ravage Soulht immi E 1u'nlbi Tolai rAarlhisauih L les-IIL tlarul VICIRI2 leido'AQUA: itliCRD east/wost Tolal Total All L S R Total L S R 1 Tr tai L S R Total L S R Total 1:00 -0 1 0 1 2 u J 11 12 1 I 2 5 0 -o i 1 6 18 7:15 Q 0 0 j 3 6 �� `; 1 2 3 12 _ I 6 ! 5 0 1 0 1 3 12 0 26 25 1 -- I; a 10 5 i 14 39 7:30 6, 7.45 0 5 O 5 6 34 l 41 il 3 ' 5 13 1 5 3 9 22 6 1, -1 3 5 °' 1 ' 14 _ 19 I lMEI0 9 28 2 8:i 4 Ill I. 3i f s6 In 8:30 0 5 5 1 I 15 20 y ° I 3 5 0 0 1 4 9 . 9 8'45 - 0 7 2 I 12 1 _ 17 19 I I , 4 1 1 3 26 7:30-8:30 3 17 1 21 23I. 101 122 17 10 33 2 14 10 26 59 181 PHI 030 0h3 025 C�]2 055 n _ X1.62 05 071 0`� 063 05 07 1042 072 067 CI5? + 53 0G6 4;00 i, 15 C 19 2 7 10 I 29 ' I 1 a 2 4 7 9 38 2 r 1 4:15 3 i 18 3 10 14 0 4 7 rJ 12 16 Q 52 4.30 1i' - 77 2 0 - - 11- 33 r i —- a 1t33 n 4:45 ;1 ^1. 30 5 11 18 48 I1 � 4 r� P 10 14 62 .,.;Ac a 39 41 2 8 5 4 6j 15 21 76 B:15 n -,: 33 6 39 i I r` 2 5 0 a 5 9 14 53 _ 5:30 1 10 I 19 1 I $ 1 2•.5 n, j a 1 1 , G G 5:4'5 3 a - 1 19 1 1 r 7 26 2 is 5 0 4 7 12 - 38 4:30-5:30 24 107 1 132 0 12 27 0-HHF 4 43 175 1 9 19 0 17 23. 44 59 234 0 75 0 69 025 01 0.6 0 61 0.5 0 6 011 038 0.88 0.56 I 0 79 Ns I 0 71 1 0 64 I Il 67 I 0 a 0 71 )ui:Han 6/77O( Page 4ofI APPENDIX C )ut:blank 6/27/2( HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 9: SH66 & Colorado Page 46 of I Recent AM Movement EBL EST EBR 4 1 f r `► WBL ' BT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) future Volume (vehnh) Number Initial C) (Qb), veh n_ .I in: A .1!rn x-1 reu-Dire t u)�n_pu � Parking Bus, Ad] Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In Adj Flow Rate, veh/h Adj No. of Lanes Peak Hour Factor Percent Heavy Veh, % Cap, veh/h Arrive On Green Sat Flow,. veh/h 13 13 5 0 1 00 1.00 1863 14 1 0.92 2 374 0 03 1774 349 349 2 Q 1 00 1863 379 1 092 2 877 0 53 1648 46 46 12 0 1.00 1.00 1900 42 0 092 2 97 0 51 183 '1i 67 67 1 0 too 1,00 1863 73 1 092 2 605 006 1774 tp 663 12 26 663 12 26 6 16 3 0 0 0 i 00 i :au 1.00 t00 1 00 1863 1900 1900 721 12 28 1 0 0 0,92 0.92 0 92 2 2 2 1026 17 103 0.56 054 015 1827 30 184 40 79 79 8 0 1.00 1863 86 1 0.92 2 1A8 017 995 119 119 18 0 1 00 1.00 1900 57 0 092 2 99 015 590 87 87 7 0 1.00 1.00 1900 95 0 092 2 205 0 15 680 +th 76 16 4 1 00 1863 83 1 0,92 2 126 017 750 36 36 14 0 10O 1.00 1900 25 0 092 2 34 0 15 201 Grp Volume(v), vela/h Grp Sat F low(s),veh/hiin k2 .10 V Ckyall Cycle 0 Clear(g_c), S Prop In Lane Lane Grp Cap(c), vein/h ViC Ratio() Avail Cap(c_a), vehth HCM Platoon Ratio Upstream Filter(l) Uniform Delay (d), sfveh Incr Delay @c12), s/veh Initial 0 Delay(d3),sfveh %ale BackOfQ(50%),veti/ln LnGrp Delay(d)Is/veh LnGrp LOS Approach Vol, vehf'h Approach Delay, s,'veh Approach LOS Timer 14 0 421 73 1774 0 1831 1//4 0.2 1.00 374 004 475 1 00 100 76 00 0.0 01 76 A Ou 00 0 000 0 .no 000 00 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0L 8,2 0.10 974 0 43 974 1 00 1 00 8.3 14 00 45 97 A L) 1.0 1100 605 012 653 1 00 1 00 55 01 00 0 5 5.6 A 0 733 0 1857 0,0 16.7 0,0 16.7 0.02 0 1043 000 0 70 0 1043 1,00 1 00 0 00 1.00 00 93 00 4.0 00 00 00 95 00 132 B 171 1769 01,0 5.2 0.16 340 0 50 345 100 100 225 12 0.0 27 23.7 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.33 0 0 0 00 0 00 a 1,00 100 0 00 (100 0.0 0.0 00 00 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 203 1630 i6 58 0.47 338 060 342 1.00 1 00 231 29 0.0 34 26.0 C 0 0 00 00 0 0 00 0 1 00 0.00 00 0.0 00 00 00 0 0 00 00 012 0 0 00 0 1 00 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 435 96 A 1 2 806 125 B 171 23.7 C 3 4 5 6 7 8 203 26 0 C Assigned Phs Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s Change Period (Y+Rc), s Max Green Setting (Ginax), s Max 0 Clear Time (g_c+11), s Green Ext Time (p_c), s Intersection Summary FICM 2010 CCrIL1 1a'` Hal 2010 LOS 1 2 6.4 37.0 4.0 70 4.0 30.0 3.0 102 00 67 146 B 4 148 6 0 90 88 0 0 5 47 40 40 22 00 6 38 7 7.0 300 187 50 8 14.8 6.0 90 72 0.4 Red Gam Subdivision 02/05/20 l8 i �lich A social's Synchwc 9 Lighl Rcporl roccnt am syn )ut:blank 6/27/2( Timing Report, Sorted By Phase 9: SH66 & Colorado Page 47 of I Recent AM Phase Number -- 1 2 1 4--L t 4 5 6 8 Movement Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize Recall Mode Maximum Split (s) Maximum Split (%) Minimum Split (s) Yellow Time (s) All -Red Time (s) Minimum Initial (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Minimum Gap (s) Time Before Reduce (s) Time To Reduce (s) Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk Cs) Dual Entry Inhibit Max Start Time (s) End Time (s) Yield/Force Off (s) Yield/Force Off 170(s) Local Start Time Cs) Local Yield (s) Local Yield 170(s) Intersection Summary Cycle Length Control Type Natural Cycle Splits; and Phases: o O4 a; t efr 05 as 4- 06 WBL Lead Yes None 8 13.3% 3 1 3.5 3 3 0 B No Yes 0 B 4 4 52 56 56 EBTL Lag Yes Max 37 61 7% 15 5 2 5 3 3 0 0 Yes Yes 8 45 38 38 0 30 30 SBTL EBL Lead Yes None None 15 8 25.0% 133% 15 8 4 3 2 1 5 35 3 3 3 3 Yes Yes 45 0 54 54 37 46 46 No Yes 0 8 4 4 52 56 56 WBTL NBTL. Lag Yes Max None 37 15 617 250% 15 15 5 4 2 2 5 5 3 3 3 3 o 0 0 a Yes Yes 8 45 38 38 0 30 30 Yes Yes 45 } 54 54 37 46 46 60 Actuated -Uncoordinated 60 9, SH66 66 & Colorado Red Bair Subdivision 02/0500W 8 Delich Associates S nchrc 9 Light Report °cent an'i syn )art:b!arlk 6/27/2( HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 9: SH66 Colorado Page 48 of 1 Recent PM Movement 1 � 4- 41/2. 464\ t 4, id EBL FPT EBR WBL \BT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vehlh) Future Volume (veh/h) Number Initial 0 (Qb), veh Pecs-Eme AdJ(A_pu 1) Parking Bus, Adj Adj Sat Flow, vehihfln Ad] Flow Rate, vehlh Adj No. of Lanes Peak Hour Factor Percent Heavy 'fie h, % Cape vent Arrive On Green Sat Flow, vehlh TIP 'i 127 621 91 48 517 32 50 121 621 91 48 511 32 50 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I OU I Utz I ,UU 1 00 LOU 100 1.00 1 00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1 00 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1900 143 698 93 54 581 32 56 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 089 089 089 089 089 089 089 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 �i 5 880 117 348 909 50 129 T1Jyr ',JS 1 ► 1V I siLk 008 055 053 005 052 050 0.15 1774 1610 215 1774 1749 96 322 4+ 116 116 8 0 1,00 1863 130 1 089 2 179 017 1070 Sc 59 18 0 I.U0 1,00 1900 41 0 0 89 2 51 015 307 14 14 7 a LOU OU 100 1900 16 a 0.89 2 94 0.15 146 70 70 4 1.00 1863 63 79 1 0.89 2 249 017 1484 34 34 (4 0 1,00 1 00 1900 I1 0 0 89 2 32 0 1 189 Grp Volume(v), vehlh Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlhlln o Serve(g_s), s Cycle Q O lea r (g —c), s Prop In Lane Lane Gip Cap(c), vehlh 1�. Ratio(.) Avail Cap(c_a), vehlh HCM Platoon Ratio Upstream Filter(!) Uniform Delay (d), slveh Ir cr Delay 0d2), sfveh Initial 0 Delay(d3),sfveh %ile BackO fQ(50%),ve hlln LnGrp Delay(d),slveh LnG rn LOS 143 0 791 1714 0 1825 21 00 207 2,1 0 0 20 7 100 0.12 485 0 997 029 000 0 79 495 0 991 1 00 1.00 1.00 100 0.00► 1.00 72 00 109 0 3 0.0 6.5 0 0 0.0 0 0 1 0 00 121 76 0,0 174 A B 54 1774 08 0B 110 348 0 16 405 1 00 1.00 90 02 00 04 92 A 0 613 0 1846 00 143 00 14.3 0.05 0 959 0 00 0.64 0 959 1 00 1 00 0.00 1 00 00 103 0.0 3 3 00 00 00 80 00 136 B 227 1699 4 7 1,8 0.25 331 0.68 331 1 00 1 00 24 0 57 00 42 29,8 C 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.00 0 100 0,00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 00 O 18 0 0 00 a 1 00 0 00 00 Ore 00 00 00 106 1818 0;0 31 0,15 344 031 344 1 00 1 00 22 1 05 00 16 22 6 C 0 0 00 00 0 000 0 1 00 000 00 0.0 00 00 0, 0 0 0 0.0 0.10 0 0.00 0 1 00 0.00 0.0 0 0 00 00 Approach VoL vehlh Approach Delay, &A/eh Approach LOS Timer 934 15.9 B 661 132 B 1 2 3 4 5 221 29.8 C 7 8 106 22 6 C Assigned Phs 1 2 F'hs Duration (6.44+ Rc), s 6.1 38.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4 0 7.0 Max Green Setting (Sma x), s 4 0 30 0 Max 0 Clear Time (g_c+l 1), s 2 8 22 7 Green Ext Time (vc), s 0 0 4 5 Intersection Summary 4 5 15x0 1.1 6.0 40 90 40 51 41 06 00 a 37.0 70 300 163 70 8 15,0 60 90 98 00 HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay HCM 2010 LOS 170 B Red Bjrri Subdivision 02/0612018 Delich Associates Sync:hi{ 9 Light Report r 1 }J cer jjIt pen syn )Ut:hlartk 6/2712( Timing Report, Sorted By Phase SH66 & Colorado Page 49 of 1 Recent PM Phase Number 4- t 1 2 4 5 6 8 Movement WBL EBIL SBTL EBL WBTL NBTI Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Max None None Max None Maximum Split (s) 8 37 15 8 37 15 Maximum um Split (%) 13.3% 613% 25 0% 13 3% 613% 25 0% Minimum Split (s) 8 15 15 8 15 15 Yellow Time (s) 3 5 4 3 5 4 All -Red Time (s) 1 2 2 1 2 2 Minimum Initial (s) 3.5 5 5 3.5 5 5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 Minimum Gap (s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 Time Before Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Dual Entry No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Inhibit Max Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Start Time (s) 0 8 45 0 8 45 End Time (s) 8 45 0 8 45 0 Yield/Force Off (s) 4 38 54 4 38 54 Yield/Force Off 170(s) 4 38 54 4 38 54 Local Start Time (s) 52 0 37 52 0 37 Local Yield (s) 56 30 46 56 30 46 Local Yield 170(s) 56 30 46 56 30 46 Intersection Summary Cycle Length Control Type Natural Cycle 60 Actuated -Uncoordinated 60 Splits and Phases: 9: SH66 & Colorado co 1 —PO 2 1 04 al 05 I O6 Cr M Red Barn Subdivision 02/06/2018 C)e ich Associates Synchro 9 Light Repot recent pin syn )ut:hlank 6/2 7/2 HCM 2010 TWSC 6: oloradol" CRl3 WCR32 Page 50 of I Recent AM Intersection int Delay, siveh Movement Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, ve h/fig Future Vol, veh/h Conflicting Peds, ii/hr Sign Control RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvnit l• le+ Mgr/Minor Conflicting Flow Ail Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy tg 1 Critical Hdwy SHthvy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap -1 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver Mov Cap -2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 LtJach _ HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Minor Lane/Major Mvmt Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio H C M Control Delay (s) HM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.6 EBL EBT EBR 4, 6 2 5 6 2 5 0 0 0 Stop Stop Stop - None r 92 2 7 Minor2 0 0 92 2 2 92 2 5 332 332 208 212 212 120 120 7,12 6,5.2 6„22 6.12 5.5.2 612 5.5.E 3,518 4.018 3.318 621 588 832 790 727 884 796 618 585 832 618 585 788 726 880 794 EB 11.4 B WBL L B T WBR 1 1 0 0 o 0 0 Stop Stop Stop None ger _ p 0 92 92 2 2 1 1 M inor1 335 119 216 71 2 612 6 Mt 354 119 235 6.52 552 5,52 1 92 2 0 NBL NBT N B P SBL SBT SBR 4 4 0 Free 4 101 1 101 1 o a Free free - None 0 0 92 92 2 2 4 110 92 2 1 Majorl 110 230 0 0 6.22 4.12 3.518 4018 3.318 2218 619 571 943 1338 885 797 786 710 611 568 943 1338 611 568 882 795 777 709 B NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR 1338 0.003 77 0 A A 0 679 589 1479 0 021 0 004 0.001 10.4 11 1 7 4 0 BB A A 01 0 0 NB 0.3 T- 2 2 0 F ree 4 170 42 170 42 0 0 Free Free - None 0 _ 0 92 92 2 2 2 185 Motor? 92 2 46 111 0 0 Y 4.12 2.218 1479 1479 • SB 01 Red Barn Subdivision D2/05/2018 Delich Associates Synchrn 9 Light Report recent am syn )ut blank 6/27/2( HCM 2010 TWSC Page 51 of 1 Recent PM Intersection Int Delay, sfveh 2.4 Movement Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, ve h/h Future Vol, vehth Conflicting Peds, #/hr Sign Control RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Row Major/Minor Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Sig 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap -1 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver Mov Cap -2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 A Dproach H CM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Minor Lane/Mayor Mvmt EBL EBT EBR 61 6 7 61 6 7 0 0 0 Slop Stop Stop None 0 86 86 2 2 71 7 Minor2 86 2 8 427 424 124 126 126 301 298 7.12 6.52 6 22 612 5.52 612 5.5.2 3.518 4.018 1318 538 522 927 878 792 708 667 Jib t 531 519 927 531 519 874 791 698 664 EB 12.7 B WBL ' VBT WBR 3 5 1 3 5 1 o 0 0 Stop Stop Stop - None 86 2 3 0 0 86 2 6 .11 86 2 1 NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 4 4 0 Free 247 247 0 Free 1 1 0 Free - None - - 0 86 86 86 2 2 2 5 287 1 Minorl Maar1 431 297 134 712 612 6.12 427 288 297 130 6.52 6.22 5 52 - 5 52 - 128 0 0 4 12 3.518 4.018 3.318 2218 535 52O 751 1458 712 668 869 789 523 517 751 1458 523 517 709 665 853 788 WB 118 B NBL NBT NBREBLn1WBLn1 BLn1 SBL SBT SBR NB 0.1 • a 40 1 103 1 103 0 0 Free Free ear f o 0 86 86 2 2 1 120 Major2 7 7 0 Free None 86 2 8 288 0 0 412 • 2218 1274 1274 SB a • 01 Capacity (vehfh) HCM Lane WC Ratio 1-1CM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS RCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1458 0.003 75 0 A A 0 - 552 538 1274 - 0156 0019 0.001 12.7 11.8 7 8 0 B B A A as 0.1 0 • Red Barn Subdivision 02/06/2018 DelFch Associates Synchru 9 Light Report recent pm syn )ut.Dlank 6/27/2( HCM 2010 TWSC 3: East Frontage Road WCR32 Page 52 of 1 Recent AM Intersection I nt Delay, s/ve h Movement Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h Future Vol, vehth Conflicting Peds, it/hr Sign Control RI Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, ft Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow MajorlMinor Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdvvy Critical Hd ►y Stg 1 Critical Hd y Stg 2 Follow-up Hd+y Pot Capa1 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % May Cap -1 Maneuver May Cap -2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach 4.3 EBL EBT EBR a 6 0 85 2 7 'I ! 17 0 -1 0 10 0 Stop Stop - None Ala 0 0 85 2 20 85 2 12 inor2 186 172 90 144 144 42 28 7.12 6 52 6,22 612 5.52 6.12 5.52 3.518 4.018 3318 775 721 968 859 778 972 872 - 741 706 968 741 706 856 764 940 869 EB WBL WBT WBR 2 2 0 Stop 85 2 2 4, 14 1t) 14 10 0 0 Slop Stop None 0 0 85 2 16 85 2 12 Minorl 188 174 21 28 28 160 146 NBL NBT NBR 4 3 17 3 17 0 0 Free Free 85 2 4 0 0 85 2 20 1 1 0 Flee None a 85 2 1 Ma jor1 92 0 0 7.12 652 6.22 412 6.12 5.52 612 5.52 - 3518 4018 3318 2.218 772 719 1056 1503 989 872 842 776 ler 734 704 1056 1503 134 704 986 869 195 762 WB • NB 1 T SBL Sir SBR 4 23 75 3 23 75 3 0 0 0 Free Free Free None 85 2 27 0 0 85 2 88 85 2 4 Major2 21 0 0 t 4.12 2,218 1595 1595 SB HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Minor LanetiVlajor Mvmt 9,9 A 9.6 A NBL NBT NBR EBLn1%'1/BLn1 SBL SBT BBR 11 17 Capacity (vehlh) HCM Lane Vie Ratio H C M Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile %%veh) 1503 0.002 7,4 0 A A 0 NMI NM 776 810 1595 - 0.05 0.038 0 017 99 9.6 73 0 A A A A 02 01 01 - Red Barn Subdivision 02/05/2018 Delich Associates Synch° 9 Light Report recent am syn )ut: b tan k 6/27/2( HCM 2010 TWSC 3: East Fronta9e Road WCR32 2 Page 5 3 of 1 Recent PM Intersection I rat Delay, s/veh Movement 3.6 EBL EBT EBR WBL 'BT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h Future Vol, veh/h Conflicting Peds, U/ter Sign Control ET Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow Majet/M inor Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hthity Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap -1 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver Mov Cap -2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach _ 4 3 7 9 3 7 9 fl 0 0 Slop Stop Stop None 85 2 4 Minor2 0 a 85 2 8 85 2 11 268 246 34 62 62 206 184 - 712 6.52 6 22 6.12 5.52 - 6,12 5 52 - 3,518 4.018 3318 685 656 1039 949 843 796 747 635 637 1039 635 637 931 835 737 733 EB 4 0 17 23 0 17 23 Q 0 0 Stop Stop Stop - None 24 24 0 Free 4 107 1 107 1 fl 0 Free Free None - 0 85 85 85 85 85 85 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 20 27 28 126 1 Minorl 255 183 72 712 6.12 6.12 248 126 183 65 6,52 6.22 5 52 5,52 - Sib ajnrl 36 0 0 412 3518 4.018 3318 2218 698 655 924 1575 819 748 938 841 669 636 924 669 636 803 734 910 833 WB 1575 NB 12 12 Free 85 2 14 Major2 127 412 2 218 1459 1459 SB ktito 27 4 27 4 0 0 Free Free • None 0 0 85 2 32 85 2 5 0 HCM Control Delay, s RCM LOS Minor Lanefiv1ajor Mvmt 9.8 A 9,9 A NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL. SBT SBR 1.3 2.1 Capacity (vehfh) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile O(veh) 1575 0,018 7.3 0 A A 779 175 1459 0 029 0.061 0,01 9.8 9.9 7.5 0 A A A A 01 02 0 Red Bain Subdivision 02/06/2018 Delich Associates Synchs 9 Light Report recent pen syn )ut:blank 6/27/2( Page 54 of 1 UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level -of -Service Average Total Delay sec/veh A 1 <10 B >10and <15 15and 'c25 D > 25 and c 35 E > 35 and c 50 f= >50 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level-of-ServiceAverage Total Delay sec/ve h A <10 B > 10and < 20 C > 20 and ; 35 >' 35andc55 _ D E >55and <8O >80 nit:blank 6/27/2( Page 55 of 1 APPENDIX D )ut:bia k 6/27/2( NIS ill *_ Page 56 of I 0 LL � o� NI' ref LL :CI W 0I a, 0-, CI- o� qoO a z Z a o aw 0 Q CD U Go Cn=i J •est �o Z~ D2 w Ec0 oa U CO . w z W � tom loZS o6 Z 05 GO W r ,4g 1 -111 IX O CSI I, N 'r I r 0 O In 0 O 0 C co EB PM 235 'KPH EB AM 200 VPH 200 O 0 MINOR STREET APPROACH - VPH C C en rib C C 0 0 C C 0 0 O) O O co 0 O O O <O 0 0 U) O O mct O 0 CO DM 7%; VPH AM Rag \/ PH U O on d Z O CO J Q H H W W t� CC O d I 0 O I at w 0 CO LAJ 0 uJ E C ID -Ffe, l CU cu > coID 8 1 O z 145 C Sct j 0 Q +ice .- mI `3 CU CL L N. e1 co it CO Y r� 41,1 t O E 66 4D O E N M U cn r U O D O J H ce CL, c7 a m C7 (s° Z nit:blank 6/27/2( Page 57 of 1 0 H U Q 89N% 0 0 z a w a M ce %Fe ct U w o� zw IC CC D Ct J � ap 0 CL cQ Q C(4 O O CL, 1g Z d o < ructi H � d vI-- Cn Ts. i J 1 2 >isY fr-0 Z r` m OQ OD W Z W O N oo CO W 2 QJ 0 C LU LU 2 C O Itzt 0 ce 0 cJ O 0 Co [B PM 255 VF'H Nos" littslites MINOR STREET APPROACH - VPH 0 0 r 0 0 CO r 0 0 C" C t Ire 0 rip O I a a cc or a C 0 aD 0 O N- 0 0 0 LU O 0 O O CO AM R4fl \/P W CL ref is. o Cd � LL O dCe W la EL co w iLLI Cei LU � W gaciaj Ci3 tL so C C) C �1 sicu m Ama jai z a) aj 2 C dc 44) tits " 9-. '9 a. cc fti LO co "O a, Cco sp-icn to a E 145 w O E C > C cuw isp- ac id.. tia a Cr) U c1 E2 O O LzC O Q CL O F W C7 Z C7 Z O J )ut:blank 6/27/2( Page 58 of I APPENDIX E mut:blank 6/27/2( Page 59 of I HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Short Bkgrd AM 9: SH66 & Colorado "3/41! ses kap *1/2 t \DI Movement Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h.) Future Volume (vehlh) Number Initial 0 (Qb) , veh Iced -Bike Adj(A_pbT) Parking Bus, Ad] Adj Sat Flow, vehfh/ln Ad) Flow Rate, vehth Aidj No. of Lanes Peak Hour Factor Percent Heavy 'fie h r % Cap, venal Arrive On Green Sal Flow, veh/h Grp Vol a rr e(v), vehlh Grp Sat FIow(s),veh/hfln Serve(g--s), s Cycle 0 C1ear(g_c), s Prop In Lane Lane Grp Cap(c), vehth V/C Ralio(X) Avail Cap(c_a vehlh. HCM Platoon Ratio Upstream Filter(I) Uniform Delay (d), siveh Ina Delay 0d2), sfve h Initial 0 Delay(d3),slveh %i le BackOfO(50%), veh/ln LnGrp Dela (d),sfveh LnGrp LOS Approach Vol vehf h Approach Delay, slueh Approach LOS Timer EBL FRT EBR WBL VVBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBR st, ts 41P 15 398 52 77 760 13 28 87 137 100 81 39 "15 398 52 77 760 13 28 87 137 100 81 39 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 18 7 4 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 100 1n0 1 00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1900 1863 1900 1900 1863 1900 16 433 48 84 826 13 30 95 72 109 88 29 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0 92 0.92 0.92 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 306 872 97 560 1024 16 100 161 110 205 111 33 003 0.53 0.51 0.06 056 0.54 0.15 017 015 015 017 0.15 1774 1648 183 1774 1829 29 174 945 644 669 650 194 16 0 481 84 0 839 197 0 0 226 0 0 1774 0 1831 1774 0 1858 1763 0 0 1513 0 0 0.2 0.0 99 1.2 0.0 21.3 0.0 0.0 0,0 2,5 0.0 0.0 0.2 00 99 12 00 213 6.2 00 0.0 8,7 00 0.0 1 00 010 1.00 0 02 015 0 37 0.48 0.13 306 0 968 560 0 1040 342 0 0 323 0 0 0,05 0:01 050 0.15 0 00 0 81 0.58 000 0 00 0 70 0.00 0.00 403 0 968 602 0 1040 342 0 0 323 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 00 1.00 1 00 1.00 1 00 1.00 100 1 00 1,00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1 00 0 00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 9.0 0.0 8.9 59 0.0 104 230 00 00 240 00 0.0 0 1 0.0 1 8 0 1 00 6.7 2 4 0.0 00 65 0.0 0 0 00 00 0.0 00 00 0.0 0.0 00 00 00 00 00 0.1 00 5.4 06 00 12 7 3 3 0.0 0.0 4 2 00 0,0 91 0.0 107 6.0 00 171 25.4 00 00 30.5 0.0 00 A B A B C C 497 923 10.6 161 13 B 197 2544 C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 t 226 30.5 C Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (+Y+Rc), s 6 6 37.0 15 0 4.8 38.8 15.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 7.0 6.0 4 0 TO 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gina), s 4.0 30,0 9.0 4 0 30.0 9.0 Max C. Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.2 11 9 10 7 2 2 23.3 8 ,2 Green Ext Time (p_c); s 0 0 7 7 0.0 0 0 4 0 0 2 Intersection Summar\, HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 17 4 RCM 2010LOS B Red Barn Subdivision 02/06/2(18 Synchic 9 Light Report Delich Associates sb am syn )L;t:blank 6/27/2( Timing Report, Sorted By Phase 9: SH66 & Colorado Page 60 of Short Bkgrd AM Phase Number Movement Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize Recall Mode Maximum Split (s) Maximum Split (%) Minimum Split (c) Yellow Time (s) All -Fed Time (s) Minimum initial (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Minimum Gap (s) Time Before Reduce (s) Time To Reduce (s) Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Dual Entry Inhibit Max Inhibit Max � Start Time (s) End Time (s) Yield/Force Off (s) Yield/Force Off 170(s) Local Start Time (s) Local Yield (s) Local Yield 170(s) intersection Summary l 4- t 1 2 4 5 6 8 Vt/BL Lead Yes None 8 13 3% 8 3 1 3.5 3 3 0 0 No Yes 0 8 4 4 52 56 56 EBTL BTL Lag Yes Max None 37 15 617% 250% 1s 1� 5 4 2 2 5 5 3 3 3 3 a a Yes Yes 8 45 38 38 a 30 30 Yes Yes 45 0 54 54 37 46 46 EBL Lead Yes None 8 13 3% A 3 1 35 3 3 0 0 No Yes vv 0 8 4 4 52 56 56 WBIL NBTL Lag Yes Max None 37 15 61,7% 258% 1a m 5 4 2 2 5 5 3 3 3 3 o 0 0 0 Yes Yes 8 45 38 38 0 30 30 Yes Yes 45 0 54 54 3? 46 46 Cycle Length Control Type Natural Cycle 60 Actuated -Uncoordinated 80 S ills and Phases: 9: SH66 & Colorado 01 04 05 4- 06 �0c3 Red Barn Subdivision 02/06/2018 Dolich Associalos Synchro 9 Light Report sb am syn jut:blare. 6/27/2( RCM 2010 ignalized intersection Summary SH66 Colorado Page 61 of I Short Bkgrd PM Movement Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) Future Volume (veh/h) Number Initial Q (CI), veh Ped-Bike Adj(A_phl) Parking Bus, Adj Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/Ire Adj Flow Rate, veh/h Adj No, of Lanes Peak Hour Factor Percent Heavy Ve ht % Cap, veh/h Arrive On Green Sat Flow, vehih EBL EBT 145 145 5 0 7 00 1 00 1863 163 1 0.$9 2 430 0.08 1774 708 708 2 0 1 00 1863 796 1 089 2 878 055 1608 g\i EBR WBL 103 103 12 0 1.00 1.00 1900 107 0 0 89 2 118 0 53 216 4- BT 44% 441\ WBR NBL 55 592 3/ 55 592 37 1 6 16 0 0 0 100 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1863 1900 62 665 38 1 1 0 089 089 0.89 2 2 2 278 902 52 005 0,52 0450 1774 1745 100 55 55 3 0 1 00 100 1900 62 0 0 89 2 131 015 334 t NBT 122 122 8 0 1.00 1863 137 1 089 2 169 017 1014 NBR 58L 70 70 18 0 1.00 1.00 1900 52 0 0,89 2 59 015 352 17 17 7 0 1.00 1 00 1900 19 0 0,89 2 96 0.15 161 t SBT SBR 40 75 75 4 0 100 1863 84 1 0.89 2 234 017 1406 38 38 14 0 1 00 1 00 1900 15 0 089 2 38 015 228 Grp " of u me (v), veh/h Grp Sat Flo (s),veh/h/in Q erve(g_s), s Cycle 0 Clear(gs), s Prop In Lane Lane Grp Cap(c), vehth V/C Ratio(X) Avail Cap(c_a), vehth HCM Platoon Ratio Upstream Filler(l) Uniform Delay (d), s/veh Incr Delay (d2), sfveh Initial 0 Delay(d3),s/veh %Ile BackOfQ(50%) , veh/in LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh LnGrp LOS 163 1774 24 2,4 1.00 430 0.38 430 1 00 1 00 87 0.6 0.0 12 9.2 A 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 001 0 1 00 0 00 00 0,0 00 0.0 0.0 903 1825 267 267 0.12 996 0,91 996 100 1 00 123 133 00 170 25 7 62 1 174 0.9 0.9 1.00 278 0.22 329 1,00 1 00 11 5 04 00 0.5 11 9 B 0 0 0.0 00 0 0 00 0 1 00 0 00 00 00 00 0.0 00 703 1845 179 179 0 05 953 074 953 1 00 1.00 11 3 51 0.0 103 164 B 251 0 0- 1701 0 0 51 0 0 0.0 8.8 0.0 0 0 0.25 0 21 330 0 0 0 76 000 000 330 0 0 1.00 100 100 1 00 0 00 0 00 24 6 00 0.0 99 00 00 0,01 0.0 0 0 5 1 0 0 0.0 345 00 0.0 C 118 1795 0.0 35 0,16 339 0.35 339 1.00 1.00 22.4 0,6 0.0 18 23.0 C 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 0,0 0,13 0 0 0 00 000 0 0 1 00 1 00 000 000 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 00 00 00 00 0.0 00 Approach Vol, veh/h Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS Timer 1066 231 C 1 2 3 4 765 161 B 251 34.5 5 6 7 8 118 23,0 C Assigned Phs Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s Change Period (Y+Rc), s Max Green Setting (Gcloak), s Max 0 Clear Time (g_c+I1), s Green Ext Time (p -c), s intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay kW 2010 LOS 1 2 4 63 387 15.0 4.0 7,0 6.0 4.0 30 0 9.0 29 28.7 55 0A 1.0 06 22 0 C 5 80 40 40 44 0.0 6 37,0 70 30 0 199 6 6 8 15.0 6.0 9.0 10.8 0.0 Red Baia Subdivision 02/06/2018 D IIc h Ass()ciates Synchs° 9 Light Report sh syn )rat. blank 6/27/2( Page 62 of 1 Timing Report, Sorted By Phase Short Bkgrd PM 9: SH66 Colorado Phase Number ire y job J r 1 2 4 5 6 8 Movement WBL EBTL SBTL ESL WBTL NBTL Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Max None None Max None Maximum Split (s) 8 37 15 8 37 15 Maximum Split (%) 13.3% 61 7% 25 0% 13,3% 61 7% 25,0% Minimum Split (s) 8 15 15 8 15 15 Yellow Time (s) 3 5 4 3 5 4 ,ill -Red Time (s) 1 2 2 1 2 2 Minimum Initial (s) 3.5 5 5 3 5 5 5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 Minimum Gap (s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 Time Before Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Dual Entry No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Inhibit Max Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Mart Time (s) 0 8 45 0 8 45 End Time (s) 8 45 0 8 45 0 Yield/Force Off (s) 4 38 54 4 38 54 Yield/Force Off 170(s) 4 38 54 4 38 54 Local Start Time (s) 52 0 31 52 0 37 Local Yield (s) 56 30 46 56 30 46 Local Yield 170(s) 56 30 46 56 30 46 Intersection Summary Cycle Length Control Type Natural Cycle 60 Actuated -Uncoordinated 80 Silts and Phases: 9 SHOE & Colorado �{J 04 1 Jfr 05 ill 06 �0� Red Ba(n Subdivision 02/06/0018 Delich AssoLia(es Synchro 9 Light Report ski pin syn nit: blank 6/27/2( HCM 2010 TWSC 6: ColoradoNVCR13&WCR32 Page 63 of 1 Short Bkgrd AM Intersection Int Delay, siveh 0,6 Movement Lane Configurations TrafficVol( veh/h Future Vol, veh#h Conflicting Peds, #1hr Sign Control RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow Major/Minor ESL EBT [BR WBL WBT WEAR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 411 6 2 6 6 2 6 Stop Stop Stop - - None 92 2 7 M inor2 1 1 0 0 0 Stop Stop Stop - None - 0 0 92 92 92 92 92 2 2 2 2 2 2 7 1 1 0 Minor1 5 5 0 Free 4, 111 1 111 1 0 {? Free Free None 0 - 0 92 92 92 2 2 2 5 121 1 Maori Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap -1 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked( % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver Mov Cap -2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach HM Control Delay, s HCM LOS 369 369 232 236 236 133 133 7.12 6.52 6,22 6.12 5.52 6,12 5,52 3518 4,018 3,318 588 560 807 767 710 870 786 584 557 807 584 557 764 709 865 783 EB 372 393 121 132 132 240 261 lee 257 0 0 712 6.52 6.22 4 12 612 5.52 - 612 5 52 - 3,518 4018 3.318 2218 585 543 930 1308 871 787 763 692 576 540 930 1308 576 540 868 784 753 691 WB NB r r 2 2 0 Free r 4i 190 46 190 46 0 D Free Free None • 0 0 92 92 2 2 2 207 92 2 50 Ma "or2 122 0 0 4 12 2218 1465 1 1465 • SB • • Minor Lane/Major Mvrnt Capacity &S/NO HCM Lane WC Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile O(veh) 10.6 B 11.5 B NBL NBT NBREBLn1WBLn1 BLn1 SBL SBT SBR 1308 0.004 78 0 A A 0 - 657 557 1465 • 0,023 0.004 0.001 10.6 115 7.5 0 BB A A 01 0 0 03 01 Red Barn Subdivision 02/06/2018 Delich Associales S ynchro 9 Light Report sb an syri mut:blank 6/27/2( HCM 2010 TWC 6: Colorado/WCR13 WCR32 Page 64 of 1 Short Bkgrd PM Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.6 Movement EBL [6T EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL Sill SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, vehf h Future Vol, veh/h Conflicting Peds, ##hr Sign Control RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow M+or/linor Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap -1 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver Mov Cap -2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach HCii Control Delay, s HCM LOS Minor Lane/Major Mvmt Capacity (veh/fl) HCM Lane WC Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 68 68 0 Stop 86 2 79 Minor2 6 8 6 B 0 D Stop slop - None 0 0 86 2 7 86 2 9 475 473 137 140 140 335 333 712 652 6.22 612 5.52 6.12 5.52 351840183318 500 490 911 863 781 679 644 492 487 911 492 487 859 780 668 641 EB 136 B lir 4011. 3 5 1 3 5 1 0 0 0 Stop Stop Stop - None 86 2 3 Minorl 0 0 86 2 6 , 86 2 1 5 5 0 Free 41, 275 1 275 1 fl 0 Free free None 0 0 86 86 2 2 6 320 Major I 86 2 1 480 476 320 142 0 0 332 332 148 144 - - 712 6.52 6,22 412 6.12 5 52 6.12 552 - 3.518 4.018 3.318 2 218 496 488 721 1441 681 644 855 778 483 485 721 1441 483 485 678 641 838 777 WB 12.3 B NBL NBT NBR E8Ln1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR 1441 0.004 76 0 A A 0 515 503 1239 - 0 185 03321 0 001 136 123 79 0 BB A A 0 7 0 1 0 NB 01 T 40 1 114 1 114 a a free Free a 0 86 86 2 2 1 133 Ma[0r2 8 8 0 Free None 86 2 9 321 0 0 4.12 r 2218 1239 1239 SB 0.1 r Red Barn Subdivision 02/06/2018 Delich Associates Synchw 9 Light Report sb pm syn )ut:blank /27/2( HCM 2010 T 3: East Frontage Road Page 65 of I Short Bkgrd AM Intersection Int Delay, slveh Movement Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h Future Vol, vet* Conflicting Peels, #Ihr Sign Control PT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % M1 rrit Flow Major/Mirror Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdvvy Critical Hdwy Sig 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap -1 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked/ % May Cap -1 Maneuver Mov Cap -2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Minor Lane/Major Mvmt 4.2 EBL EBT EBR 4 6 19 11 6 19 11 0 4 0 Slop Stop Stop • None 85 2 7 Minor2 0 0 85 2 22 204 189 158 158 46 31 712 652 612 5.5.E 6.12 5.52 1518 4.018 754 706 844 767 968 869 85 2 13 99 6.22 3318 957 717 691 957 717 691 841 752 933 866 EB 10 B WO WBL WBT WBR 4, 2 16 11 2 16 11 0 0 0 Stop Stop Stop . None 85 2 2 Minor1 0 0 85 2 19 85 2 13 NBL NBT NBP 3 3 0 Free 85 2 4 Majorl 206 190 23 101 30 30 176 160 j7' 12 6.52 6,22 4.12 612 5.52 612 552 3518 4.018 3.318 2218 752 705 1054 1491 987 870 826 766 711 690 1054 1491 711 690 984 867 776 751 WB 97 A NBL NBT NBREBLn1WBLn1 BLn1 SBL SBT SBR NB 1 4P 19 1 19 1 U 0 Free Free None 0 0 85 2 22 85 2 1 r t SBL SBT SBR 25 25 0 Free 85 2 29 Major2 4* 83 83 0 Free 3 3 0 Free - None 0 0 85 2 98 24 0 412 2.218 1591 1591 SB 1.6 85 2 4 r Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Conti of Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1491 0 002 7-4 A 0 760 796 1591 0056 0.043 0018 0 T 10 9.7 7.3 A - B A A 02 01 01 0 A Red Barn Subdivison 02/06/2018 Delich Associates Synchm 9 Light Report sb am syn )ut;blar,; 6/27/2( HCM 2010 TWSC 3: East Frontage Road WCR32 Page 66 of 1 Short Bkgrd PM Intersection Int Delay, slveh 3.7 Movement Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, yeti/II Future Vol, vehiti Conflicting Feeds, #/hr Sign Control FAT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow Major/Minor EBL EST EBR 3 3 0 Stop e 85 2 4 M inor2 *TA 8 10 8 10 0 0 Stop Stop - None 0 t 85 2 9 85 2 12 WBL ' BT WBR 0 0 a Stop 85 2 0 Minor1 46 19 25 19 25 D 0 Stop Stop - None NBL NBT NBR 27 27 0 Free 118 118 0 Free +1 1 0 tree - None o 0 o - 0 85 85 85 85 85 2 2 2 2 2 22 29 32 139 1 Maiorl SBL SBT SBR 46 13 30 4 13 30 4 0 0 0 Free tree tree - None r 85 2 15 Major2 i 0 85 2 35 85 2 5 Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 v Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap -1 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver Mov Cap -2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Minor Lane/Major Mvmt 297 68 229 712 6.12 612 272 38 68 204 - 6.52 6.22 5.52 5.52 - 3.518 4.018 3.318 655 635 1034 942 838 - 774 733 - 601 614 1034 601 614 921 829 710 717 EB 9.9 A 282 274 139 203 203 79 71 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 6.12 5.52 6.12 5 52 - 3,518 4 018 3.318 2 218 670 633 909 1570 799 733 930 836 638 612 909 1570 638 612 781 717 899 827 WO 10.1 B NB NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLrt1 SBL SBT SBR 1.4 40 0 0 a 140 0 4.12 2.218 1443 1443 SB 21 Y a Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane VAC Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS H C M 95th %tile Q(veh) 1570 0.02 73 0 A A 0 1 758 752 1 443 0 033 0 069 0,011 - 99 10.1 75 0 A B A A 01 02 0 Red Bain Subdivision 02/06/2018 Delich Associates Synchco 9 Light Report sb pm syn )ut:blank 6/27/2( Page 67 of 1 APPENDIX F )uubla.nk 6/27/2( Page 68 of] HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Long Bkgrd AM 9; SH66 & Colorado *a *1/4 t 14fr Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations _ vitt r vi tt r )4tAr 'it r Traffic Volume (vehlh) 25 575 75 110 1105 40 35 140 200 205 160 65 Future Volume (veh/h) 25 57.5 75 110 1105 40 35 140 200 205 160 65 Number 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 18 7 4 14 Initial a (CI), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fed -Hike Ad j(&_pa T) I.00 i .00 1,00 i .00 1.00 i Ou 1,00 i 00 Parking Bus( Ad j 1,00 1 00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 100 1:00 1,00 100 1.00 1.00 Ad! Sat Flow, vehlhlln 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 .Adj Flow Rate, vehlh 26 605 0 116 1163 0 37 147 18 216 168 0 Adj No. of Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Peak Maur Factor 0 95 0.95 0.95 0 95 0.95 0.95 0 95 0.95 0.95 0195 0.95 0 95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, vrehltI 275 1428 639 490 1563 699 323 250 212 355 323 274 Arrive On Green 0 04 0 40 0,00 0 08 0 44 0 0 0,05 013 0.13 0,09 0,17 0 00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 3539 1583 1774 3539 1583 1774 1863 1583 1774 1863 1583 Grp oiume(v), vehlh 26 605 0 116 1163 0 37 147 18 216 168 0 Grp Sat Flows) veh/h/l n 1774 1770 1583 1774 1770 1583 1774 1863 1583 1774 1863 1583 Serve( _s), s 0.5 7,0 0 0 2 0 15.6 0,0 1 0 4,2 04 5.0 4.7 043 Cycle ID Clear(g_c), s 0.5 7 0 0.0 2 0 15.6 0 0 1.0 4.2 0 6 5.0 4,7 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehlh 275 1428 639 490 1563 699 323 250 212 355 323 274 V/c Paho() 0 09 0 42 0 00 0.24 0 74 0 00 0 11 0 59 0.08 0 61 0 52 0 00 Avail Cap(c_a), vehlh 363 1428 639 510 1563 699 393 327 278 355 327 278 H C M Platoon Ratio 100 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 100 1 00 Upstream F ilter(l) 1 00 1 00 0 00 1 00 1.00 0 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 0 00 Uniform Delay (d), s'veh 10 7 12,2 0.0 8 3 13 2 0 0 19 5 232 21.6 19 8 21 4 0 0 Incr Delay 02), s/vreh 01 0 9 0 0 0 2 3 3 0.0 0.2 2.2 0 2 3 0 1 4 0 0 Initial QDelay(d3)fslvreh 00 00 0.0 00 00 0.0 00 0,0 0,0 0.0 00 00 %lie BackO1O(50%) veh#Ire 0 2 3 5 0 0 1 0 8.3 0 0 0.5 2 3 0.3 1 1 2 5 0 0 Ln rp Delay (d)is/ve h 10 8 13 2 0.0 8 5 16.5 0 0 19 6 25.4 21 8 22.8 22.8 0 0 LnGrp LOS B B A B BC CC Approach Vol, veh/h Approach Delay; slvreh Approach LOS 631 131 B 1279 158 B 202 24,0 C Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 384 218 C Assigned Phis 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7 4 29.0 5.8 14 9 5 2 31.2 8.0 12,6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4 0 7,0 4 0 6.0 4.0 7 0 4 0 6,0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 22 0 4 0 9 0 4 0 22.0 4.0 9.0 Max0Clear Time (g_c#I1),s 40 90 30 67 25 176 70 6.2 Green ExtTime (p_c),s 00 83 00 04 0.0 34 00 04 Intersection Surnrr!ary, HCM 2010 + tri Detay 16 8 HCM 2010 LOS B Rod Bar n Subdivision 02/08/2018 Synchro 9 Light Report [)elic,h Associalos lb am syn )ut:blank 6/27/2( Timing Report, Sorted By Phase 9: SH66 Colorado Page 69 of I Long Bkgrd AM Phase Number 1 2 1 3 4 4- 5 6 `► t 7 8 Movement Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize Recall Mode Maximum Split (s) Maximum Split. (%) Minimum Split (s) Yellow Time (s) All -Red Time (s) Minimum Initial (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Minimum Gap (s) Time Before Reduce (s) Time To Reduce (s) Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Dual Entry Inhibit Max Start Time (s) End Time (s) Yield/Force Off (s) Yield/Force Off 170(s) Local Start Time (s) Local Yield (s) Local Yield 170(s) Intersection Summary _ Cycle Length Control Type Natural Cycle 'Rik UM_ Lead Lag Yes Yes None Max 8 29 113% 48.3% 8 15 3 5 1 2 3.5 5 3 3 3 3 0 0 No Yes 0 8 4 4 52 56 56 Yes Yes 8 37 30 30 0 22 22 NBL. SBTL Lead Lag Yes Yes None None 8 15 13 3% 25 0% 8 15 3 4 1 2 4 5 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 No Yes Yes Yes 37 45 45 0 41 54 41 54 29 37 33 46 33 46 60 Actuated -Uncoordinated 60 Ills and Phases: 9: SH6b & Colorado EBL BT L Lead Lag Yes Yes None Max 8 29 13.3% 43,3% 8 15 3 5 1 2 3.5 5 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 No Yes 0 B 4 4 52 56 56 Yes Yes 8 37 30 30 22 22 SBL Lead Yes None 8 13,3% 8 3 1 4 3 3 0 0 No Yes 37 45 41 41 29 33 33 NBTL Lag Yes None 15 25.0% 15 4 2 5 3 3 0 0 Yes Yes 45 0 54 54 37 46 46 la 1 04 , O 5 iile 06 iis*0 7 t 08 Red Barn Subdivision 02/08/2018 CJelic h Associates Synchro 9 Light Report lb am syn )ut:blank 6/27/2 Page 70 of 1 Queues Long Bkgrd AM 9: SH66 Colorado eik S. fte t 1 /* \PP Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flaw (vph) 26 605 79 116 1163 42 37 147 211 216 168 68 WC Ratio 0.09 0.43 010 0 25 0,72 0.05 0.09 0,49 0,48 036 037 0.12 Control Delay 6.5 14.3 0 3 7 6 17 3 01 14.4 29.0 7.9 22,9 23.3 0.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 Total Delay 6.5 14.3 0,3 7.6 17.8 01 14.4 29.0 7.9 22,9 23.3 044 Queue Length 50th (ft) 4 82 0 17 145 0 9 49 0 58 46 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 12 122 0 36 #311 0 26 97 46 #113 109 0 Internal Link Dist ((1) 2644 2413 1876 5 322 Turn Bay Length (ft) 450 400 450 400 250 250 250 250 Base Capacity (vph) 286 1419 754 460 1609 828 391 324 456 386 459 554 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spill back Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced vie Ratio 0.09 0 43 010 0.25 0 72 0,05 0.09 0.45 0 46 0.56 0.37 012 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds ca pacify h queue may be longer Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Red Barn Subdivision 02/08/2018 Synchro 9 Light Report Delich Associates lb am.syn )ut:plank 6/27/2( Page 71 of 1 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Long Bkgrd PM 9: H 6 & Colorado Movement sifr ftst kw. 4\ t EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR \si• 1‘ SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 tt r li tt r f"i t r m t P Traffic Volume (vehth) 225 1020 150 80 860 120 80 220 110 65 140 60 Future Volume (veh/h) 225 1020 150 80 860 120 80 220 110 65 140 60 Lumber 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 18 7 4 14 Initial Q Oa), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj (A_pb l) 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1 00 1.00 Parking Bus, Ad j 1-00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1 00 1.00 1 00 1100 1.00 1 00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/hlln 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 Ad) Flow Pate, vehth 237 1074 38 84 905 0 84 232 0 68 147 0 Ad j No. of Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0 95 0.95 0.95 095 0 95 095 0 95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0 95 Percent Heavy Ve h, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, vehlh 403 1466 656 316 1328 594 359 316 268 293 301 255 Arrive On Green 010 041 041 006 038 0.00 0.07 0.17 000 006 016 000 Sat Flow, vehfh 1774 3539 1583 1774 3539 1583 1774 1863 1583 1774 1863 1583 Grp Volume(v), vehlh 237 1074 38 84 905 0 84 232 0 68 147 0 Grp Sat Flo (s),veh/h/in 1774 1770 1583 1774 1770 1583 1774 1863 1583 1774 1863 1583 0 Serve(g_s) , s 4.5 15 0 0.8 1 6 12.6 0.0 2.2 6.9 0.0 1.8 4 2 0,0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.5 15.0 0.8 1 6 12 6 0.0 2.2 6,9 0.0 1 8 4.2 0 0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1:00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vet* 403 1466 656 316 1328 594 359 316 268 293 301 255 V/C Ratio() 0.59 0.73 0.06 0 27 0 68 0 00 0.23 0 73 0 00 0 23 0 49 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 403 1466 656 355 1328 594 385 318 270 333 318 270 1 -IM Platoon Patio 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Upstream Filter($) 1 00 1.00 1.00 1 00 1,00 0 00 1,00 1.00 0 00 1.00 1 00 0 00 Uniform Delay (d), sfveh 11 1 14 4 10.3 11 3 15 4 0 0 18.3 23 1 0 0 18.7 2.2 4 0.0 Incr Delay (12), s/veh 2 2 3.3 0 2 0 4 2 8 0 0 0 3 8 5 0,0 0 4 1 2 0 0 Initial O Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 %Ile Back0fQ(50%),vehlln 2.4 7.8 0.4 0.8 6 6 0 0 1 1 4.3 0 0 0.9 2.3 0.0 LnG rp Delay(d) s./ve h 13.4 17 7 10.5 11 8 18 2 0.0 18.6 31 6 0.0 191 23.6 0 0 LnG rp LOS BBBBB B C B C Approach Vol, vehlh Approach Delay, sfveh Approach LOS Timer _ 1349 16,7 B 989 177 B 316 28,1 C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 215 22 2 C Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6,7 30.3 7 2 14.5 9 0 28.0 6.7 14.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4 0 TO 4 0 6.0 4.0 7.0 4.0 6.0 (M1ax Green Setting (Gmax): s 4.0 22.0 4.0 9.0 5 0 21.0 4,0 9.0 Max 0Clear Time (g_c+I1),s 36 170 42 62 65 146 38 8.'9 Green Ext Time (p_ca, s 0 0 4,1 0 0 0 5 0 0 5 I 0 0 0 0 Intersection Summary FICIM12010 Girl Delay 18 7 HC12010 LOS B Pod Barn Subdivision 02/08/2018 Synch o 9 Light Report Dolich Associates lb pm syn lt:blank 6/27/2( Timing Report, Sorted By Phase 9: SH66 & Colorado Page 72 of I Long B1<grd PM Phase Number 1 1 1 2 3 4 t sifis t 5 6 1 8 Movement Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize RuudII Model Maximum Split (s) Maximum Split (%) Minimum Split Cs) Yellow Time (s) All -Red Time (s) Minimum Initial (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Minimum Gap (s) Time Before Reduce (s) Time To Reduce (s) Walk Time (s) Flash Don t Walk lk Cs) Dual Entry Inhibit Max Start Time (s) End Time (s) Yield/Force Off (s) Yield/Force 011 170(s) Local Start Time (s) Local Yield (s) Local Yield 170(s) Intersection Summary Cycle Length Control Type Natural Cycle Splits and Phases: 4\ 03 4 D4 ICI I 05 itsl �b ~(77 II Oe WBL Lead Yes None 8 133% 8 3 1 ,5 3 3 0 0 EBTL Lag Yes Max 29 48 3% 15 5 2 5 3 3 0 0 NBL Lead Yes None 8 13 3% 8 3 1 4 3 3 0 0 SUL Lag Yes None 15 250% 15 4 2 5 3 3 0 0 EBL Lead Yes None 9 15.0% 8 3 1 35 3 3 0 0 anL Lag Yes Max 28 46.7% 15 5 2 5 3 3 0 0 SBL Lead Yes None 8 13.3% 8 3 1 4 3 3 0 0 NBTL Lag Yes None 15 250% 15 4 2 5 3 3 0 0 No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 0 8 37 45 0 9 37 45 8 37 45 0 9 37 45 0 4 30 41 54 5 30 41 54 4 30 41 54 5 30 41 54 51 59 28 36 51 0 28 36 55 21 32 45 56 21 32 45 55 21 32 45 56 21 32 45 60 Actuated -Uncoordinated 60 9: SH66 & Colorado Red Barn Subdivision 02/08/2018 DDlich Associates Synchw 9 Light Report lhpErgsyn )ut:blank 6/27/2( Page 7 3 of 1 Queues Long Bkgrd PM 9: SH66 & Colorado ite 44— ka 4\ at to \Pt Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR LaFieGrouprlow(vph) 237 1074 158 84 905 126 84 232 116 68 147 63 v/c Ratio 0 68 0 71 0 20 0.29 0.67 0.17 0.23 0.64 024 0.21 0,47 014 Control Delay 192 185 2.0 87 186 13 158 336 1,4 15.7 28.3 07 Queue Delay 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0 0 Total Delay 19.2 185 20 87 186 1.3 15 8 336 1 4 153 28,3 0.7 Queue Length 50th (ft) 38 174 0 12 142 0 21 81 0 17 49 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) #109 245 20 28 202 10 48 #177 3 40 97 0 Internal Link Dist (10 2644 2413 1876 5322 Turn Bay Length (II) 450 400 450 400 250 250 250 250 Base Capacity (vph) 350 1516 792 292 1344 725 373 368 487 331 321 453 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Red uctn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0 68 0.71 0.20 0.29 0.67 01 17 0.23 0.63 0,24 0.21 0 46 014 Intersection Summa 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Red Barr Subdivision 02/08/2018 Synchro 9 Light Report Delich Associates lb pm.syn u_t:blank 6/27/2( HCM 2010 TWSC okkradoANCRI & WCR32 Page 74 of I Long Bkgrd AM Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SEAT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, vehlh Future Vol vehfh Conflicting Pert s, #Ihr sign control ITT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Flour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow Major/Minor to 75 5 75 5 0 0 120 120 0 stop Stop stop - - None 250 95 2 79 inor2 0 B 95 95 2 2 5 126 5 5 0 Stop 95 2 5 inorl 4? 5 5 0 Stop 0 0 95 2 5 5 5 0 stop None 95 2 5 45 160 5 45 160 5 0 0 0 Free Free Free None 250 0 - 95 95 2 2 47 168 Malor1 95 2 5 5 280 90 5 280 90 0 0 0 Free Free Free None 250 - 250 0 - 0 95 95 95 2 2 2 5 295 95 Ma or2 Conflicting Firstly,: Ail Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stag 1 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap -1 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % May Cap -1 Maneuver May Cap -2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach 576 573 295 305 305 271 268 712 6.52 6.22 6.1.E 5 52 6.12 5,52 3,518 4018 3318 428 430 744 705 662 735 687 408 413 744 408 413 679 660 698 661 EB tir 637 571 171 266 266 371 305 7,12 6,52 6.22 6.12 552 612 552 - 3 518 4 018 3 318 390 431 873 739 689 649 662 S 311 414 873 311 414 712 663 533 660 WB 295 0 0 412 2218 1266 1266 ■ ! � NB 1?4 0 0 412 2.218 1403 1403 • SB HCM Control Delay, s H M LOS Minor Lane/Major Mwrit 129 B 114 B 17 NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2 BLn1 SBL SBT SBR 0.1 Capacity (\eh/h) HCIii Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCIV1 Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1266 408 721 443 1403 0.037 . 0 193 0 182 0 036 0 004 8 159 11 1 114 7 6 A - C B B A 0.1 - - 07 07 (U 0 Red Barn Suhr_1ivikion @210812018 Dolich Associates Synchra 9 Light Fri? crl lb am syn )ut:blank /27/2( HCM 2010 TWSC 6: ColoradoiWCR13 WCR32 Page 75 of Long Bkgrd rd PM Intersection Int Delay, stveh 8.1 Movement Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, vein/h Future Vol, vehlh Conflicting Peds, Sign Control RT Chan n el4zed Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvrnt Flow Major/Minor EBL EE3T [BR ill 'Pi 140 5 90 140 5 90 d 0 0 Stop Stop Stop - None 250 95 2 147 MInor2 0 0 95 2 5 95 2 95 WBL WBT WBR 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 0 0 Stop Stop Stop None 95 2 5 Iinor 1 0 0 95 2 5 95 2 5 NBL NBT NBR to 135 400 5 135 400 5 Q 0 0 Free Free Free - None 250 0 - 0 95 95 95 2 2 2 142 421 5 Majorl SBL SBT SBR II r 5 165 85 5 165 85 a o 0 Free Free Free . None 250 - 250 0 0 95 95 95 2 2 2 5 174 89 Major2 NO Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap -1 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver May Cap -2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach 897 895 174 184 184 713 711 7,12 652 6.22 612 5.52 6.12 5.52 • 1518 4.018 3 318 261 280 869 818 747 423 436 234 251 869 234 251 735 744 372 392 EB Ile 942 892 424 708 708 234 184 7.12 6.52 6.22 612 5.52 6.12 5.5.E 3,518 4.018 1318 243 281 630 426 438 769 747 196 251 630 196 251 383 394 677 744 WB T 174 0 0 4.12 2 218 1403 1403 a T - i NB 426 0 0 412 2,218 1133 1133 V SB e HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Minor Lane/Mator Mvmt Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane WC Ratio HMI Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HC's 95th %tile Q(veh) 30 . 1 C 185 C 2 NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1 SBL. SBT SBR 1403 - - 234 769 281 1133 0.101 - - 0.63 0.13 0 056 0 005 79 - - 43 4 104 18.6 8.2 A EBC A 03 - - - 3 8 0.4 0.2 0 02 Red Barn Subdivision 02108/20'18 Delich Assoc alos Synchra 9 Light Report lb pm syn nit:blank 6/27/2( HCM 2010 TWSC 3: East Frontage Road & WCR32 Page 76 of ] Long Bkgrd AM Intersection Int Delay, slveh Movement Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h Future Vol, vehlh Conflicting Peds, #/hr Sign Coritt of RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow Major/Minor 6.4 EBL EBT EBR 4' 10 35 15 10 35 15 O O 0 Slop Stop Slop - None 0 0 95 95 2 2 11 37 Minor2 95 2 16 WBL WBT WBR 7O 35 50 7O 35 50 Q 0 0 Stop Stop Stop - - None 95 2 74 Minor1 O O 95 2 37 95 2 53 Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap -1 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % May Cap -1 Maneuver May Cap -2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Minor Lane/Major lvIvrit Capacity (vehfh) HCM Lane ViC Ratio HUM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 327 298 129 224 224 103 74 7,12 6.52 6,22 6.12 5,5.E 6,12 5,52 - 3.518 4,018 1318 626 614 921 779 718 903 833 552 593 921 552 593 776 696 816 830 EB 11-2 B 308 284 58 58 250 226 712 6.52 6,12 5 52 6.12 5,52 3 518 4.018 644 625 954 847 754 717 NBL. NBT NBR 5 5 0 Free 250 95 2 5 Majorl 30 3O 30 3O U O Free Free None 0 O 95 2 32 ftte • 95 2 32 SBL. BBT SBR TP, 45 120 5 45 12O 5 O O O free Tree rree None 250 0 0 95 95 95 2 2 2 47 126 5 Ma'or2 47 132 O 0 6.22 4,12 3.318 2 218 1022 1453 587 604 1022 1453 587 604 951 844 680 695 WB 11.9 B NBL NBT NBR EBL.n1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR 1453 0.004 75 A a 642 685 1540 0 098 0.238 0.031 112 119 74 • B B A 0.3 09 01 NB 06 63 0 O 4.12 F 2 218 1540 154O BB 2 • Red Barn Subdivision 02/08/2018 C)elich Associates Synchro 9 Light Report lb am syn nut:blank 6/27/2( HCM 2010 TWSC 3: East Frontage Road & WCR32 Page 77 of 1 Long Bkgrd rd PM Intersection Inn Delay, siveh Movement 5.7 EBL EBT EBR WBL VVBT WaR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, vehlh Future Vol, vehlh Conflicting Peril, #/hr Sign Control RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, if Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow Ma'or/Minor _ Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pei Cap -1 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver May Cap -2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach 4, 5 20 15 5 20 15 0 0 0 Stop Stop Stop - None 95 2 5 MInor2 531 176 355 7.12 6.12 6.12 0 0 95 95 2 2 21 16 r r 523 50 176 347 6.52 6,22 552 - 552 Mb 3.518 4018 3 318 459 459 1018 826 753 662 635 - 375 425 1018 375 425 804 717 560 618 EB 4) 50 35 60 50 35 60 D 0 0 Stop Stop Stop None 95 2 53 Minor1 0 0 95 2 37 95 2 63 40 40 0 Free 250 130 80 170 80 o 0 Free Free - None 0 0 95 95 2 2 42 179 Majorl 95 2 84 500 484 221 53 0 0 305 305 195 179 - 7 12 6 52 6.22 4.12 612 5 52 6.12 552 3518 4.018 3318 2218 481 483 819 1553 705 662 807 751 430 447 819 1553 430 447 686 644 734 715 WB m NB • TPD 60 45 5 60 45 5 0 0 0 Free Free Free None 250 95 2 63 Ma jor2 0 0 95 2 47 95 2 5 263 0 0 4,1.E 2218 1301 1301 • t c a SB a HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Minor Lane/Ma'or Mvmt 12.3 B 142 B NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 EL SBT SBR 1V 43 Capacity (veh/h) H C M Lane VIC Patio HCM Control Delay (s) H C M Lane LOS HON 951h %tile Q(veh) 1553 0 027 7.4 A 0.1 Red Bain Subdivision 02/08/2018 [Mich Assodalos 532 541 1301 0.079 0 282 0 049 123 14,E 79 B B A 0 3 1.2 0.2 • Synchro 9 Light. Report lb prn syn )Llt:blank 6/27/2( Page 78 of l APPENDIX G ia mt:blank 6/27/2( HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary SH66 & Colorado Page 79 of 1 Short Total AM Existing Geometry Movement Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) Future Volume (veh/h) Number Initial 0 (Gb), veh Ped-Bike Adj A—pbT) Parking Bus, ,Adj Adj Sat Flow, vehth/ire Adj Flow Rate, vehlh Adj No, of Lanes Peak Hour Factor Percent Heavy Veh, % Cap, vehdh Arrive On Green Sat Flow, veh/fi Grp 'olume(v), veh/h Grp Sat Flow(s),vehl MIn Serve(g_s), s Cycle c Clear(g,c), s Prop In Lane Lane Grp Cap(c), vehth Ratio(X) Avail Cap(c_a), veh1h HCM Platoon Ratio Upstream Filter(I) Uniform Delay (d), s/veh Thu Delay d2), slveh Initial Oeiay(d3),s/veh %ite Ba ck0f0(50%)1vehi Ire LnG rp Delay(d) fsiveh LnGrp LOS .01 -Pk te EBL EBT EBR WBL 111 tifr 25 398 52 77 25 398 52 13 5 2 12 1 (} 0 0 0 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 0 1.00 1 0 1863 1863 1900 1863 27 433 52 84 1 1 0 1 fl 92 Q 92 0.92 0.92 2 2 2 2 292 933 112 542 0,03 0 57 0 Sb 0 OS 1774 1632 196 1774 27 1774 0.5 0.5 1,00 292 0.09 337 1.00 100 12.2 0.1 0.0 0.3 1214 B 0 0 0.0 00 0 0 00 0 1 00 0.00 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 485 1828 13.8 13.8 011 1045 0.46 1045 1 00 1 00 112 15 0.0 7 3 123 8 84 1774 17 17 1.00 542 0.15 558 1.00 1,00 79 01 00 0.8 80 A 4 - At% 4\ 1NST WBR NBL tt 760 20 28 760 20 28 6 16 3 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1,00 1 00 1.00 1863 1900 1900 826 21 30 1 0 0 0.92 092 092 2 2 2 1064 27 76 0.59 0.58 0.21 1809 46 134 0 t 0.0 00 0 0.00 0 1.00 0.00 00 0.0 00 0 0 0.0 847 229 1855 1688 30.9 0.0 30.9 10.8 0,02 0.13 1092 405 0.78 0,57 1 092 405 100 100 1.00 1 00 13.9 31 3 5A 18 00 0,0 17 2 5.4 19 3 33 1 NBT NBR 91 137 91 137 8 18 0 0 1.00 7.00 1,00 1863 1900 99 100 1 0 0.92 0.92 2 2 183 165 fl22 X21 817 737 SBL SBT SOP frte, 118 94 68 118 94 68 7 4 14 o a o 1.00 1 00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1900 1863 1900 128 102 60 0 1 0 0 92 0 92 0.92 2 2 2 177 115 61 0.21 0 22 02'I 531 514 273 0 0 290 0 0 0 0 1318 0 0 OM 0.0 8 2 0 0 0 0 00 0.0 19.0 00 0.0 0.44 0,44 0.21 0 0 339 0 0 000 000 0,86 000 0,00 0 0 339 0 0 1 00 1 00 1.00 1 00 1 00 0 00 0 00 1 00 0.00 0 00 0.0 00 351 00 0,0 00 00 189 00 00 010 00 0000 0.0 0,0 00 89 010 0 0.0 0.0 53.9 0,0 0.0 D Approach Vol, vehlh Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS Timer 512 12.6 B 1 2 3 931 183 B 229 33 1 C 4 5 6 7 8 290 53.9 Assigned Phs Phs Duration (G -I-Y+ Pc), s Change Period (Y FRO, s Max Green Setting (Gmax), s Max 0 Clear Time (g_c+11), s Green Ext Time (p_c), s Intersection Summary 1 2 7,2 57,0 40 7.0 4.0 500 37 158 0.0 9 9 4 25,0 60 190 21.0 0.0 5 57 4.0 40 25 0,0 6 585 7,0 50,0 32.9 76 8 250 6.0 190 12.8 16 HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay HCM 2010 LOS 23 8 Red Rain Subdivision 02/07/201: FJelic,h Assocliat' z Synch° 9 Light Report st am syn mut:blank 6/27/21 Timing Report, Sorted By Phase 9: SH66 & Colorado Page 80 of 1 Short Total AM Existing Geometry Phase Number at t 2 4 5 6 8 Movement Lead/ Lag Lead -Lag Optimize Recall Mode Maximum Split (s) Maximum Split eh) Minimum Split (s) Yellow Time (s) All -Red Time (s) Minimum Initial (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Minimum Gap (s) Time Before Reduce (s) Time To Reduce (s) Walk lime (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Dual Entry Inhibit Max Start Time (s) End Time (s) Yield/ Force Off (s) Yield/Force Off 170(s) Local Start Time Cs) Local Yield (s) Local Yield 170(s) Intersection Summary Cycle Length Control Type Natural Cycle WBL Lead Yes None 8 8.94/0 3 1 35 3 3 0 0 No Yes 0 8 4 4 82 Be 86 EBTL SBTL Lag Yes Max None 57 25 613% 27 8% 15 15 5 4 2 2 5 5 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 o Yes Yes a 65 58 58 0 50 50 Yes Yes 65 0 84 84 57 76 76 913 Actua ted-Uncoordinated 90 Spills and Phases: 9 SH66 & Colorado col 04 _ 05 4- 06 O EBL Lead Yes None 8 8.9% 8 3 1 35 3 3 0 0 No Yes 0 8 4 4 82 86 86 WBTL NBTL Lag Yes Max None 57 25 63.3% 27.8% 15 15 5 4 2 2 5 5 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 Yes Yes 8 65 58 58 0 50 50 Yes Yes 65 0 84 84 57 76 76 Red Barn Subdivision 02(07/2018 Delicti Associates Synchrc 9 Light Reepoi I st am syn n it:blank 6/27/2( Queues 9: SH66 & Colorado Page 81 of 1 Short Total AM Existing Geometry Lane Group sofr EBL EBT WBL t 4 WBT NBT SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 27 490 84 848 278 304 v/c Ratio 0 09 0.46 0.15 0.75 0.68 1.30 Control Delay 5.1 12.6 53 18,4 34 9 194.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 ,0 Total Delay 5.1 12.6 5.3 18.4 34.9 194 6 Queue Length 50th (U) 4 149 13 271 115 -220 Queue Length 95th (ft) 12 225 27 537 /209 #382 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2644 2413 1876 2383 Turn Bay Length (ft) 450 450 Base Capacity (vph) 303 1062 554 1138 406 233 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.09 0 46 0.15 0 75 0 68 1.30 Intersection Summary Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Red Barn Subdivision 02/07/2018 Synchro 9 Light Report Delich Associates st am.syn )ut;blank 6/27/2( HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 9: SH66 & Colorado Page 82 of I Short Total PM Existing Geometry Movement J p 'NT k. di\ t \wok EBL EBT ERR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) Future Volume (veh/h) Number Initial CI (tab), veh Iced -bike MI 1) Parking Bus, Adj Adj Sal Flow, vela/h/ln Adj Flow Rate, vein/h Adj No of Lanes Peak Flour Factor Percent Heavy Veh, % Cap, veh/h Arrive On Green Sat Flow, veh/h 178 178 5 0 I.0IJ 1 00 1863 200 1 0.89 2 434 0 07 1774 708 708 2 0 103 103 12 0 1,00 1.00 1.00 1863 1900 796 109 1 0 0,89 0.89 2 2 983 135 0.61 0,60 1604 220 55 592 55 592 1 b D 0 1,00 1.00 1863 62 1 0,89 2 296 0 04 1774 1.00 1863 665 1 0,89 2 977 0,58 1684 57 57 16 0 1 00 1.00 1900 60 0 0,89 2 88 0,57 152 55 55 3 0 1 l U0 1 00 1900 62 0 0 89 2 106 018 298 137 137 8 0 1 00 1863 154 1 0,89 2 193 019 1016 70 70 18 0 10(,1 1.00 1900 62 0 0:89 2 72 018 377 4 29 84 57 29 84 57 7 4 14 0 0 0 1,00 1 00 1 00 1,00 1 00 1900 1863 1900 33 94 42 0 1 0 0:89 0.89 0.89 2 2 2 86 194 77 0 18 0 19 0.18 199 1025 405 Grp Volume(v), veh/h Grp Sat Flow(s) voh/hlln Serve(g_s), s Cycle 0 lear(g—c), s Prop In Lane Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h ViC Ratio(X) Avail Cap(c_a), vehth HCM Platoon Ratio Upstream Filter()) Uniform Delay 0), sfveh Incr Delay (d2), s/veh Initial + Delay(d3),stveh °file BnckOf (50%)1vehlln LnGrp Delay(d), stveh LnGrp LOS 200 1774 37 3,7 1 00 434 046 440 1 00 100 107 08 00 21 115 B 0 0 00 0.0 0 0.00 0 1 00 0.00 00 00 00 00 00 905 '1824 343 34,3 012 1117 0.81 1117 1 00 100 134 64 00 191 19.8 B 62 1774 12 12 1 00 296 021 320 1 00 1 00 127 0 3 00 06 13'1 B 0 0 Ou 0 :0 0 000 0 1 00 0.00 00 00 0.0 0.0 00 725 1836 24 16 246 0 08 1065 068 1065 1 00 1 00 131 35 00 133 166 B 278 1692 6 3 144 022 351 079 351 1 00 1 00 35 3 117 00 80 47 0 a 0 0 0 0 0:0 00 0.0 0.0 0.22 000 000 0 (0 100 100 000 000 0.0 0 0 0,0 0 0 0 0 00 0.0 0 0 00 00 169 0 0 1629 0 0 00 00 00 81 0 0 0.0 0.20 0.25 339 0 0 0.50 0 00 0.00 339 0 0 100 100 100 1.00 0,00 0 00 328 00 00 11 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 00 0.0 3391 0 0 0,0 C Approach Vol, veh/h Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS Timer 1105 18,3 B 787 1+6 4 B 278 47.0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 169 339 C Assigned Phs 1 2 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.8 60 9 Change Period Ci+Rc), s 4 0 7 0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 53,0 Max 0 Clear Time (g_c+t 1), s 3 2 36 3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0 0 9 5 Intersection Surrtimaoy ECM 2010 ctrl Delay HCM2010LOS 222 4 22,0 60 160 101 2 5 97 40 6.0 57 00 6 58 0 70 510 266 118 8 220 6,0 16.0 164 00 Red Bain Subdivision 02/C7112018 L)elich Associates Synchro nch ro 9 Light Report st pm syn Artnblank 6/27/2( Timing Report, Sorted By Phase 9: SH66 & Colorado Page 83 of 1 Short Total PM Existing Geometry c -Rot -fr t Phase Number 1 _ 2 4 5 6 8 Movement WBL EBTL SOIL EBL WBTL Nall Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Max None None Max None Maximum Split (s) 8 60 22 10 58 22 Maximum Split (96) 8.9% 66 7% 24 4% 11 1% 64 4% 24.4% Minimum Spilt (s) 8 15 15 8 15 15 Yellow Time (s) 3 5 4 3 5 4 All -Red Time (s) 1 2 2 1 2 2 Minimum Initial (s) 345 5 5 3 5 5 5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 Minimum Gap (s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 Time Before Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 VValk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Dual Entry No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Inhibit Max Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Start Time (s) 0 8 68 0 10 68 End Time (s) 8 68 0 10 6B 0 Yield/Force Off Cs) 4 61 84 6 61 84 Yield/Force Off 170(s) 4 61 84 6 61 84 Local Start Time (s) 80 88 58 80 0 58 Local Yield (s) 84 51 74 86 51 74 Local Yield 17O(s) 84 51 74 86 51 14 Intersection Summa Cycle Length Control Type Natural Cycle Solits and Phases: (ci 04 05 411 O6 t O8 a iu 4te r. ;r I� 90 Actuated -Uncoordinated 80 9: 5H66 & Colorado Rod Ban Subdivision 02/C 7/2018 Mich Associates Synchro 9 Light Report st pm syn )ut:b►lank 6/27/2( Queues 9: SH66 & Colorado Page 84 of 1 Short Total PM Existing Geometry Lane Group EBL EBT WBL Rom— t WBT NBT SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 200 912 62 729 295 191 \/c Ratio 0.49 0.80 0.22 0.68 1,05 0.67 Control Delay 81 20.6 5.7 17/ 102.0 42.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 Total Delay 8.1 20.6 5.7 17.2 102.0 42.7 Queue Length 50th (ft) 30 372 9 265 -175 88 Queue Length 95th (ft) 50 555 18 387 #330 #175 Internal Link Dist (9) 2644 2413 1876 2383 Turn Bay Length (It) 450 450 Base Capacity (vph) 409 i 134 278 1066 282 283 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spill tack Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.49 0 8g 0.22 0.68 1 05 0,67 intersection Summary - Volume exceeds capacity, queue Is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles, Red Barn Subdivision 02107/2018 Synchs 9 Light Report Delich Associates st pm.syrn ) ut:blank 6/27/2( HCM 010 Signalized Intersection Summary 9: SH66 & Colorado Page 85ofl Short Total AM NB & SB LT Lanes Movement l EBL EBT Nit [BR WBL 41- 441/4. - WBT WBR NBL I /ID NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR J Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) Future Volume (veh,/h) Number Initial Q(CbM,veh Pei -Bike Adj (A pbr) Parking Bus, Adj Adj Sat Flow, vehl Min Adj Flow Rate, vehlh Ad] No. of Lanes Peak Flour Factor Percent Heavy Veh, % Cap, vets/h Arrive On Green Sal Flow, vehlh Grp V'olume(v), veh/h Grp Sat F lows) vehlh/In Serve(g_s), s Cycle 0 C lea r(g c), s Prop In Lane Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h WC Ratio(X) Avail Cap(c_a), vehf l� HCM Platoon Ratio Upstream Filter(l) Uniform Delay (d)( sfveh Incr Delay (d2), siveh Initial 0 Delay(d3),s/veh %Ile BaokO 10(50%), vehlln LnGrp Dela (d),s/veh LnGrp LOS Approach Voi i veh/h Approach Delay, stye h Approach LOS Timer Il 1 1 t 11 1. 25 398 52 77 760 20 28 91 137 118 94 68 25 398 52 77 760 20 28 91 137 118 94 68 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 18 7 4 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1 00 1.00 1.00 1 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 27 433 49 84 826 21 30 99 59 128 102 31 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 92 0 92 0 92 0.92 0.92 0 92 0 92 0.92 0 92 0.92 0 92 0 92 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 277 852 96 530 976 25 269 223 133 246 280 85 0,04 0.52 0.50 0.06 0.54 0.52 019 0 20 0.19 0.19 0 20 0.19 1774 1644 186 1774 1809 46 1252 1095 653 1223 1372 417 21 0 482 84 0 847 30 0 158 128 0 133 1774 0 1830 1774 0 1855 1252 0 1748 1223 0 1789 0.4 0.0 11.0 13 00 24 7 1.4 0.0 5.1 6.6 00 41 0.4 0.0 11.0 1 3 0 0 24.7 5.5 0.0 5,1 11.7 0,0 41 1,00 010 1 00 0 02 1.00 0 37 1,00 0,23 277 0 948 530 0 1001 269 0 357 246 0 365 0.10 000 0.51 016 000 085 0.11 0.00 0.44 0:52 000 036 351 0 948 566 0 1001 269 0 357 246 0 365 1 00 1,00 1 00 1.00 1 00 1 00 1,00 1.00 1 00 1.00 1 00 1 00 1 00 0100 1.00 1 00 0 00 1 00 1 00 0.00 1 00 1.00 0 00 1.00 109 0,0 1081 70 00 124 250 0.0 22.4 283 0.0 219 02 0,0 19 0.1 00 88 0.2 00 09 19 0,0 06 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 00 00 0.0 00 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 60 0.7 0 0 14 9 0.5 0.0 2.5 2 3 0.0 2.1 11,0 0.0 12 0 71 0.0 21 2 25.2 0.0 23 2 302 0.0 22.5 B B A C C C C C 1 509 12.0 0 931 200 B 188 23.5 4 5 6 7 8 261 26.3 C Assigned Phs 1 2 Phs Duration (+Y+ Rc) , s 67 39 0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4 0 7 0 Max Green Setting (Grnax), s 4,0 32.0 Max Q Clear Time (cg_c+11), s 3.3 13 0 Green E t Time (p_c), s 0.0 8 0 Intersection Summary 4 18.0 6.0 12.0 13.7 0.0 5 53 4.0 4.0 24 0.0 6 40 4 7.0 32.0 267 3 4 8 18,0 6.0 120 7,5 0.9 KM 2010 Ctrs Delay HCM 2010 LOS 190 B Red Barn Subdivision 02/07/2018 Delicl Associates Synchro 9 Light Report st am nb-ski It syn mat:biank 6/27/2( Timing Report, Sorted By Phase 9: SH66 & Colorado Page 86 of I Short Total AM NB & SB LT Lanes Phase Number 1 1 2 4 1-- 5 6 8 Movement Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize Recall n rviucuu Maximum Split (s) Maximum Split (%) Minimum Split (s) Yellow Time (s) All -Red Time (s) Minimum Initial (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Minimum Gap (s) Time Before Reduce (s) Time To Reduce (s) Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Dual Entry Inhibit Max Start Time (s) End Time (s) YleidWFcrce Off (s) Yield/Force Oft 170(s) Local Start Time (s) Local Yield (s) Local Yield 170(s) Intersection Summary WBL Lead Yes None 8 12 3% B 3 1 3.5 3 3 0 0 No Yes 0 B 4 4 57 61 61 EBTL BTL Lag Yes Max None 39 18 60,0% 2? 7% 15 15 5 4 2 2 5 5 3 3 3 3 0 0 B 0 Yes Yes B 47 40 40 B 32 32 Yes Yes 47 0 59 59 39 51 51 EBL Lead Yes None 8 123% 8 3 1 35 3 3 0 0 WBTL NRTL Lag Yes Ctiriax None 39 18 60.0% 27.7% 15 15 5 4 2 2 5 5 3 3 3 3 o 0 0 o No Yes Yes Yes 0 8 8 47 4 40 4 40 57 0 61 32 61 32 Yes Yes 47 0 59 59 39 51 51 Cycle Length Control Type Natural Cycle pills and Phases: 65 Actuated -Uncoordinated 65 9: SH66 & Colorado (Cl � 04 �'t72 .." D5 4- 06 tO:3 Red Bartz Subdivision 02/01/20 I3 Delich Associates Synchic 9 Light Report st am nb-sly It syn )ut:blank 6/27/2( Queues 9: SH66 & Colorado Lane Grou EBB EBT WBL Page 87 of I Short Total AM NB & SB LT Lanes BT NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 27 490 84 848 30 248 128 176 v/c Ratio 0 09 0 51 0 15 039 0.14 0 59 0,88 0,45 Control Delay 4.2 12 0 4.3 19 8 24 2 20.1 79.3 20 7 Queue Delay 0 0 0 0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 4,2 12.3 4.3 19.8 24.2 20,1 79 3 20 7 Queue Length 50th (ft) 3 116 9 195 10 50 50 43 Queue Length 95th Op 9 193 20 #522 31 117 #141 96 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2644 2413 1876 2383 Turn Bay Length (11) 450 450 Base Capacity (vph) 308 969 558 1068 215 433 151 401 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Capp Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0 09 0.51 0.15 0.19 0.14 0.57 0,85 0.44 Intersection Summaq _ # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum alter two cycles, Red Barn Subdivision 02/07/2018 Synchro 9 Light Report Delich Associates st am nb-sb It.syn ) ut:blank 6/27/2( HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 51--166 & Colorado Page 88 of 1 Short Total PM NB & SB LT Lanes Movement Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) Future Volume (vehfh) Number Initial 0 (Qb), veh Ped -Bike Adj (A pb I ) Parking Bus, Adj Adj Sat Flow, veh/hlln Al Flow Rate, ve h/h Adj No. of Lanes Peak Hour Factor Percent Heavy Veh, V map, vehth Arrive On Green Sat Flow, vehlh Grp Volame(v), vehfh Grp Sat Flow(s),'ieh/hiIn Serve(g_s), s Cycle 0 C lear(gs), s Prop In Lane Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h V/C Ratio(X) Avail Cap(c_a), vehi'h HM Platoon Ratio Upstream l ilteral) Uniform Delay (d), s/veh Incr r Delay O2a, sfveh Initial 0 Delay(c13),slveh %Ile BackOfQ(50%),vehlln LnGrp Delay(d)es/veh Lnr LOS Approach Vole vehlti Approach Delay, slveh Approach LOS Timer J 't 4- k. 1 t \to 1 J EBL FBI EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR ii to ) 1+ '1 178 708 103 5.5 592 57 55 178 708 103 55 592 57 55 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Ou 1.00 1,00 1 00 1.00 1 00 1 00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1.00 1863 1863 1900 1863 1563 1900 1963 200 796 108 62 665 58 62 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 89 0.89 0.89 0 89 0,89 0 89 0.89 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 428 904 123 284 886 77 0.09 0 56 0.55 0 05 0.52 0 51 015 1774 1606 218 1774 1689 147 1272 200 0 904 62 0 723 1774 0 1824 1774 0 1837 3.0 0.0 27 9 10 0,0 20.0 3.0 0.0 27 9 1.0 0.0 20.0 1 00 012 1.00 0 08 428 0 1027 284 0 963 047 000 088 0 22 000 035 432 0 1027 329 0 963 too 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1.00 0.00 1 00 1 00 0.00 1.00 9 7 0.0 12 3 11 6 00 121 08 00 108 04 0.0 54 00 DO 0.0 0 0 00 00 17 00 169 05 00 115 10,5 0.0 23.1 11 9 0 0 17 5 1104 785 20-8 17 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 t35 62 1272 30 647 1.00 235 0 26 235 100 100 27 8 06 00 1I 28.4 C 11 t. 131 /0 79 84 51 • u• • v �• v • v 137 70 29 84 57 8 18 7 4 14 0 0 0 0 0 1 00 1,00 1 00 1 00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900► 154 46 33 94 21 1 0 1 1 0 0 89 0 89 0,89 0.89 0 89 2 2 2 2 2 234 70 169 250 56 017 0.15 015 017 015 1378 412 1178 1475 330 0 200 33 0 115 0 1790 1178 0 1805 LI.0 6.8 1.8 0.0 3f 0.+0 6.8 8,6 0.0 3,7 0.23 1.00 018 0 304 169 0 306 000 066 019 0.00 0.38 0 304 169 0 306 100 100 100 100 100 0 00 100 1,00 0 00 1 00 0.0 25 3 30.1 0 0 24 0 0,0 51 06 00 08 00 0,0 00 00 00 0.0 3.8 06 00 1 9 0,0 304 30.7 0.0 24 7 262 148 29.9 26.1 8 Assigned Phs Phs Duration (G+Y *Rc), s Change Period (Y+Rc), s Max Green Setting (Gmax), s Max U Clear Time (g_c+11), s Green Ext Time (p_c), s Intersection Summary 1 2 4 64 425 16.0 40 70 60 4 0 340 10.0 30 299 10 6 00 31 00 5 8.9 40 50 50 0.0 6 40 0 70 33 0 22 0 7I 160 6.0 17.0 88 03 HCV 2010 Ctrl Defray HEfM 2010 LOS 20 9 C Red Bain Subdivision 02/07/2018 Delich Associatos Syii hro 9 Light Report st pm nb-sb It syn nit:blarnk 6/27/2( Timing Report, Sorted By Phase SH66 Colorado Page 89 of 1 Short Total PM NB & SB LT Lanes Phase Number 1 sik �i- 1 1 2 4 5 6 8 Movement Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize Recall Mode Maximum Split (s) Maximum Split (%) Minimum Split (s) Yellow Time Cs) All -Red Time (s) Minimum Initial (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Minimum Gap (s) Time Before Reduce (s) Time To Reduce (s) Walk lk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Dual Entry Inhibit Max Start Time (s) End Time (s) Yield/Force Off Cs) Yield/Force Off 170(s) Local Start Time Cs) Local Yield (s) Local Yield 170(s) Intersection Summary Cycle 'Length Control Type Natural Cycle Splits and Phases: Ir0 1. 04 05 aill- O6 0 .. , WBL Lead Yes None 8 1230 8 3 1 35 3 3 0 0 No Yes 0 S 4 4 56 60 60 EBTL Lag Yes Max 41 631% 15 5 2 5 3 3 0 0 Yes Yes 8 49 42 42 64 33 33 SBTL EBL Lead Yes None None 16 9 246% 138% 15 8 4 3 2 1 5 35 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 Yes Yes 49 0 59 59 40 50 50 65 Actuated -Uncoordinated 65 9: SF 166 & Colorado No Yes 0 9 5 5 56 61 61 WBTL NBTL Lag Yes Max None 40 16 61 5% 24 6% 15 15 5 4 2 2 5 5 3 3 3 3 0 a 0 a Yes Yes 9 49 42 42 0 33 33 Yes Yes 49 0 59 59 40 50 5O Red Bain Subdivision 02/01/20 IS Dolich Associates Synchio 9 Light Report s[ pm nb-sb t sy'n )ut:hla k 6/27/21 Queues 9: SH66 & Colorado Page 90 of 1 Short Total PM NB & SB LT Lanes ati 144. t Lane Grout.EBL EBT WBL ' BT NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 200 912 62 729 62 233 33 158 v/c Ratio 0 50 0.84 0.21 0 75 0.36 0.14 0.29 0.49 Control Delay 7.7 21.8 4.8 18.1 31.1 37 8 31 5 23,3 Queue Delay 0.0 an ao 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 7.7 21,8 4,8 18.1 31 1 37.8 31 5 23 3 Queue Length 50th (t) 20 297 6 206 22 75 12 40 Queue Length 95th (t) 37 #548 14 332 54 #167 35 90 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2644 2413 1876 2383 Turn Bay Length (R) 450 450 250 250 Base Capacity (vph) 402 1089 289 974 182 329 121 335 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spill back Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced vie Ratio 0.50 0484 0,21 0.75 0,34 0.71 0 27 0.47 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Red Barn Subdivision 02/0712018 S ynchro 9 Light Report Delich Associates st pm nb-sb It.syn nut: blank 6/27/2( HCM 2010 Signalized intersection Summary H 6 & Colorado Page 91 of Short Total AM Required Geometry Movement ste EBL EBT Nit ter EBR WBL 'BT 4141/2. WBR NBL NBT NBR \Sis 41/ SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ) t it 'I + If 19 'P if 'I ta r Traffic Volume (vehf h) 25 398 52 77 760 20 28 91 137 118 94 68 Future Volume (veh/h) 25 398 52 77 760 20 28 91 137 118 94 68 Number 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 18 7 4 14 Initial IQ (Oh), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj (A,pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 11.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1:00 1.01 1.00 1._00 Ad) Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 27 433 2 84 826 0 30 99 10 128 102 0 Actj No of Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0 92 0,92 0 92 0.92 0.92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0.92 0 92 0,92 Percent Heavy Vehr % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, vehth 320 985 810 599 1029 847 259 318 243 260 318 243 Arrive On Green 0,04 0 53 0.51 0 0►6 0 55 0 00 015 0 17 0.15 0.15 017 000 Sat Flo, vehdh 1774 1863 1583 1774 1863 1583 1287 1863 1583 1279 1863 1583 Grp Volurne(v), veh/h 27 433 2 84 826 0 30 99 10 128 102 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehth/ln 1774 1863 1583 1774 1863 1583 1287 1863 1583 1279 1863 1583 Q ser ve(g_s), s 0r4 8.4 0 0 1 2 20 9 0 0 1.3 2.7 0 3 5.8 2,8 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_e), s 0.4 B 4 0.0 1.2 20 9 0 0 4,1 2.7 0 3 8,5 2.8 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 00 1.00 1 00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehith 320 985 810 599 1029 847 259 318 243 260 318 243 CRafio() 0.08 044 0.00 014 0.80 000 012 0.31 004 0.49 0.32 000 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 403 985 810 641 1029 847 259 318 243 260 318 243 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1 00 1.00 1,00 1 00 1 00 1.00 1 00 1 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(1) 100 1 00 1 00 1,00 1 00 0 00 1 00 1.00 1 00 100 1,00 0 00 Uniform Delay (d), siveh 90 8.5 7.0 57 10 6 00 24 0 21.3 21 1 26.0 21.3 00 Ira' Delay 02), siveh 01 1.4 00 01 66 00 02 06 0.1 14 0.6 00 Initial CI rye lay(d3),slveh 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 %Ile BackOfQ(50%),vehfin 0 2 4.6 0.0 0 6 12 5 0.0 0.5 15 0.1 2 1 1 5 0,0 LnGrp Uelay(d),s/veh 9,1 9,9 7.0 5 8 17 2 0.0 24 2 21.8 21.2 27.4 21.9 0.0 LnGrp LOS A A A A B CCCC C C Approach Vol, vets/h Approach Delay, siveh Approach LOS Timer 462 9.8 A 910 16 1 B 139 22.3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 230 25.0 C Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (+Y+Ra s 6,6 37.0 15.0 5,2 38.4 15.0 Change Period (Y+RO, s 4.0 7.0 6 0 4,0 TO 6.0 Max Green Setting (G rnax), s 4.0 30.0 9 0 4.0 30.0 9.0 Max Q Clear Time (g c+11), s 3.2 10.4 10 5 2 4 22 9 6.1 tree n F xt Time (p_e) , s 0 0 7 5 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 intersection Summary la 2010 Ctrl Delay 16 1 HCM201 0 LOSS B Rod Bar Subdivision 02/07/2018 Synchra 9 Light Report Del ch Associates sl r 1egLlired goo syn n it:blank 6/27/2( Tiring Report, Sorted By Phase 9: SH66 & Colorado Page 92 of 1 Short Total AM Required Geometry Phase Number a, 1 1 2 4 5 t 6 8 Movement Lead/Lag Lead-La€g Optimize r'eeaii iwiude Maximum Split (s) Maximum Split (%) Minimum Split Cs) Yellow Time (s) All -Red Time (s) Minimum Initial (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Minimum Gap (s) Time Before Reduce (s) Time To Reduce (s) Walk Time Cs) Flash Dont Walk (s) Dual Entry Inhibit Max Start Time (s) End Time (s) YleId/Force Off (s) Yield/Force Oft 170(s) Local Start Time (s) Local Yield (s) Local Yield 170(x) Intersection Summary WBL SBTL EBL Lead Lag Lead Yes Yes Yes None Max None None 8 37 15 8 13 3 61.7% 25.0% 13 8% 8 15 15 8 3 5 4 3 1 2 2 1 3.5 5 5 3 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No Yes 0 8 4 4 52 56 56 Yes Yes 8 45 38 38 0 30 30 Yes Yes 45 0 54 54 37 46 46 No Yes 0 8 4 4 52 56 56 WBIL NBTL Lag Yes Max None 37 15 61.7% 25 0% 15 15 5 4 2 2 5 5 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 Yes Yes 8 45 38 38 0 30 30 Yes Yes 45 0 54 54 37 46 '16 Cycle Length Control Type Natural Cycle SuliCb and Phases: 60 Actuated -Uncoordinated 60 SH 5O & Colorado CO1 04 is 05 iliarb flb 1478 Red Barn Subdivision 02/0100I8 Delich Associates Synch() 9 Light Report fat ' L'q u ired qea syn )ut:blank 6/2712( Queues 9: SH66 & Colorado Page 93 of I Short Total AM Required Geometry esv. k. \Pi Lane Group EBL EAT EAR WE ' BT WBR NBL NAT NBIR SAL SAT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 27 433 57 84 826 22 30 99 149 128 102 74 \kc Ratio 0 07 0.38 0.06 012 0.67 0 02 0,16 0.34 0.42 0.68 0.34 0.21 Control Delay 3 2 9,7 0.2 3,3 14 0 01 24.7 25.7 91 45.7 25.6 21 Queue Delay 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 Total Delay 3.2 9.7 0.2 3 3 14 0 01 24.7 25 7 91 45.7 25-6 2.1 Queue Length 50th (re 2 90 0 7 155 0 10 32 0 44 33 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 7 152 2 17 #461 0 30 70 43 #115 72 7 Internal Link Dist (f1) 2644 2413 1876 2383 Turn Bay Length (11) 450 300 450 300 250 250 250 250 Base Capacity (vph) 410 1142 1001 702 1241 1078 199 320 371 199 320 367 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bpil lbac k Cap Red uctn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.07 0 38 0 06 0.12 0.67 0.02 0.15 0.31 0440 0.64 0.32 0,20 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Red Barn Subdivision 02/07/2018 Synchro 9 Light Report Delich Associates st am required geo,syn t:blank 6/27/2( HCM 010 Signalized Intersection Summary 9: SH66 & Colorado Page 94 of I Short Total PM Required Geometry l 1 4 t 1 ttAis 1/4s, 44/ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL ' BT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 4 ft vi it P vi it P iii + I Tram:: Vn}iim (vehih) 178 708 103 55 5Q2 57 55 137 70 9Q 84 57 Future Volume (vehih) 178 708 103 55 592 57 55 137 70 29 84 57 Number 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 18 7 4 14 Initial CI (h), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (red -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1,00 1.00 1.00 1 00 100 LOU 1,00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat f=low, vehlhllri 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 200 796 63 62 665 7 62 154 0 33 94 0 Ada No. of Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Peak Flour Factor 0 89 0 89 0 89 0.89 0,89 089 0.89 0 89 0 89 0,89 0.89 0-89 Percent Heavy Veit % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 '-' r uui f l l 70 1031 8 360 flt r nu 803 1111 L'$L 7 L rli17fl 1 2.89 lin L.17 Arrive On Green 0.08 0 55 0 54 0 05 0.52 0 51 0.14 015 0 00 014 015 0.00 Sat Flow, vehih 1774 1863 1583 1774 1863 1583 1297 1863 1583 1228 1863 1583 Grp Votume(v), vehih 200 796 63 62 665 7 62 154 0 33 94 0 Grp Sat Flow(s), veh}h in 1774 1863 1583 1714 1863 1583 1297 1863 1583 1228 1863 1583 serve Cycle CI C Iear(gs), s 2.8 19 7 1.1 0.9 15.6 01 5.4 4.5 0 0 6.0 2.7 0,0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1 00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c). vehth 470 1031 850 360 976 803 242 289 219 198 289 219 V/C Ratio(X) 043 077 007 0.17 0.6B 0.01 026 053 0.00 0.17 0 33 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), vehih 470 1031 850 413 976 803 261 315 241 215 315 241 HCM Platoon Ratio 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1.00 1 00 1 00 1.00 1 00 1 00 Upstream rilter(l) 1 00 1 00 1 00 1,00 1.00 1 00 1 00 1.00 0 00 1 00 1 00 0 00 Uniform Delay 0), s#veh 7 9 10 3 6 6 8 5 10 4 7 2 25 6 23 0 0 0 26.8 22 2 0 0 Ina Delay (d2), sJveh 0,6 5 6 0 2 0 2 3.8 0,0 0 6 1 5 0 0 OA 0 6 0 0 Initial (aDelay(d3),sfveh 00 00 00 0,0 00 00 0.0 0.0 00 00 00 00 %Ile B ackOfO(50%), veh/ln 1 4 11 6 0 5 0 4 9 0 0.1 1 0 2 4 0 0 0 5 1 4 0 0 LnGrp Delay(d)swot 8.5 15 9 6 8 8 7 14 3 7.2 26.1 24.6 0 0 27.1 22.9 0 0 LnGrp LOS A B A A B A C C C C Approach Vol, vehs'h Approach Delay, sfveh Approach LOS Timer 1059 13.9 B 734 137 B 216 25.0 C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 127 24,0 C Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.2 38.8 14,2 8.0 37 0 14,2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4 0 7.0 6 0 4 0 7 0 6,0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 30 0 9,0 4 0 30 0 9 0 Max 0 Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 29 217 80 48 176 74 Green Ext Time (p.c), s 0 0 5.2 0 2 0 0 7 0 0 3 Intersection summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 15 6 HCM 2010 LO B Red Barn Subdivision 02/07/2018 Syiichto 9 Light Report Deti& Associates st pin clued coo syn )ut:blank 6/27/2( Timing Report, Sorted By Phase 9: SH66 Colorado Page 95 of 1 Short Total PM Required Geometry Phase Number 1 1 2 4 ern - t 5 6 8 Movement Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize Recall Mode Maximum Split (s) Maximum Split (%) Minimum Split (s) Yellow Time (s) All -Red Time (s) Minimum Initial (s) Vehicle Extension Cs) Minimum Gap (s) Time Before Reduce (s) Time To Reduce (s) Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Dual Entry Inhibit Max Start Time (s) End Time (s) Yield/Force Off (s) Yield/Force Off 170(s) 0(s) Local Start Time (s) Local Yield (s) Local Yield 170(s) Intersection Summar r Cycle Length Control Type Natural Cycle Splits and Phases: col [404 ...fr O5 I O6 t P 08 WBL Lead Yes None 8 13 3% 8 3 1 35 3 3 0 0 No Yes 0 8 4 4 52 56 56 EBTL SBTL Lag Yes Max None 37 15 61 7% 25 0% 15 15 5 4 2 2 5 5 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 Yes Yes 8 45 38 38 0 30 30 Yes Yes 45 0 54 54 37 46 46 EBL Lead Yes None 8 13.3% 8 3 1 3,5 3 3 0 0 No Yes 0 a 4 4 52 56 56 WBTL NBTL Lag Yes Max None 37 15 61.3% 25.0% 15 15 5 4 2 2 5 5 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 Yes Yes 8 45 38 38 0 30 30 Yes Yes 45 0 54 54 37 46 46 60 Actua ted- U ncoordin a.ted 60 9: SHOO & Colorado Rod Barn Subdivision 02107/2018 Delich Associates S ynch. e 9 Light Report st pm required qco syn nit:blank 6/27/2 Queues 9: SH66 & Colorado Page 96 of 1 Short Total PM Required Geometry l t r � 1 � Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR BBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 200 796 116 62 665 64 62 154 79 33 94 64 v/c Ratio 0.40 0.67 011 015 0.58 0,06 0.32 0.49 0,22 0.18 0 30 0.18 Control Delay 5,5 14 9 2.0 3.7 12.8 0.5 27 7 28 7 2.6 251 25.0 1.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0,0 0 0 0,0 0.0 0,0 0.0 Total Delay 5.5 14,'9 2.0 3 7 12.8 0.5 27.7 28 7 2.6 25.1 25,0 1.1 Queue Length 50th (ft) 19 223 0 5 165 0 20 51 0 11 30 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 35 X426 17 13 270 4 51 100 8 32 66 1 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2644 2413 1876 2 383 Turn Bay Length (ft) 450 300 450 300 250 250 250 250 Base Capacity (vph) 503 1194 1041 419 1141 1001 218 349 387 207 .319 387 Starvation Cap Reduntn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SpilIbaek Cap Recduetn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reduetn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced vio Ratio 0.40 0.67 0111 015 0 58 0 06 0.28 0.44 0.20 016 0 27 0.17 Intersection Summary it 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Red Barn Subdivision 02/07/2018 Synchro 9 Light Report Delich Associates st pm required geo syn )L1t:blank 6/27/2( HCM 2010 TWSC 12: Colorado & Red Barn Page 97 of 1 Short Total AM Intersection nt Delay, s veh 2.5 Movement Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h Future Vol, vehih Conflicting Reds, #fir Sign Control RI Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Flour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flo+ v Major/Minor EBL EBR 27 27 Stop 0 0 0 92 2 29 Minor2 59 59 0 Stop None r 92 2 64 NBL NBI 21 117 21 117 0 0 Free Free - None 250 92 2 23 Majorl 0 0 92 2 127 SBT SBR 198 8 198 8 0 0 Free Free - None 0 0 92 2 215 Major2 92 2 9 Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap -1 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver Mov Cap -2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach 393 220 220 173 224 0 642 6.22 4.12 542 5 42 3.518 3.318 2,218 611 820 1345 817 851 r r 601 820 1345 601 817 842 EB T NB SB 0 Y HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Minor Lane/Ma'or Mvmt 10.6 B 1.2 NBL NBTEBLn1 SBT SBR U Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane VAC Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1345 - 136 0.017 0 127 7.7 - 1O6 A - B 0 1 - o . 4 Red Barn Subdivision 02/07/2018 Delich Associates Synchre 9 Light Report st am syn )ut:btank 6/27/20 HCM 2010 TWSC 12: Colorado & Red Barn Page 98 of I Short Total PM Intersection Int Delay, slveh Movement Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h Future Val, vein/h Conflicting Peds, #/hr Sign Control RI Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, Mvmt Flow Maier/Minor 2 EBL EBR NBL NBT 17 17 0 Stop 0 0 0 86 2 20 Minor2 39 39 0 Stop None 86 2 45 } 67 282 67 282 0 0 Free Free • None 250 - - 0 0 86 86 2 2 78 328 Malorl SBT SBR 126 30 126 30 0 0 Free Free None 0 0 86 2 147 Ma'or2 86 2 35 Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stgt9 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap -1 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver Mov Cap -2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS 648 164 484 642 5.42 5,42 3.518 435 865 620 411 411 865 585 Minor Lane/Maior Mvmt EB 11.1 B 164 6.22 181 4.12 3.318 2,218 881 1394 881 1394 • NB 1.5 NBL NBTEBLn1 SBT SBR z SB 0 Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane VIC Ratio HCM Control Delay Cs> HCM Lane LOS H M 95th %tile O(veh) 1394 0056 7,7 A 0.2 654 0.1 - 11,1 B 03 Red Barn Subdivision 02/07/2018 Cielich Associates Synchro 9 Light Report st pm syn nit:blank 6/27/2( HCM 2010 TWSC 6: ColoradoPWCR13 WCR32 Page 99 of 1 hort Total AM Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, vet* Future Vol, ve th Conflicting Peds, #/hr Sign Control PT channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, 1/ Grade, % Peak Hour Faclor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvnit Flow MalorlMinar Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Sig 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap -1 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % May Cap -1 Maneuver Mov Cap -2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach HCM Control Delay, a HCM LOS Minor Lane/Mior Mvmt Capacity (veh/h) H CM Lane WC Ratio HCIM Control Delay (s) Havi Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile (veh) 0.9 EEL EBT EBR 4i 7 2 10 7 2 10 (J 0 0 Slop Stop Stop None r 92 2 8 inor2 415 242 173 7.12 612 612 0 0 92 2 2 92 2 11 415 238 242 173 6.52 6.22 5.52 5,52 - 3.518 4018 3,318 548 528 801 762 705 829 756 541 520 801 541 520 753 704 818 747 EB 103 B IMMO WBL W8T WBR 1 1 4, 1 0 1 0 8 0 0 Stop Stop Stop None g 0 92 92 92 2 2 2 1 1 0 Wort NBL NBT NBR 1.1 15 128 1 15 128 1 it 0 0 Free Free Free - - None 250 0 • 0 92 92 92 2 2 2 16 139 1 Majorl 420 439 140 263 172 172 248 267 7-12 652 62 4.12 6.12 552 6.12 552 - 3,518 4018 3.318 2218 544 512 908 1301 830 756 756 688 529 505 908 529 505 820 747 742 687 We 12 B Ma a 1301 NB 0.8 NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR 1301 0 013 7.8 A 0 - 649 517 1443 - 0 832 0►.O04 0,002 187 12 7.5 0 - B B A A - O1 0 0 a 0 0 • SBL SBT SBR 2 2 0 Free 195 47 195 47 0 0 Free Free None r 0 0 92 92 92 2 2 2 2 212 51 Major2 140 0 0 4,12 • 2.218 1443 1443 SB a.1 a Red Barn Subdivision 02/01/2018 Cho lick Associates Synchro 9 Light Report st arr syn mt: blank 6/27/2( HCM 2010 TWSC 6: Colorado/WCR13 WCR32 Page 100 of 1 Short Total PM Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 2,9 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT VVBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h Future Vol, vela/h Conflicting Reds, #}hr Sign Control RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow Mator/Minor Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Sig 1 Critical Hdwy Sly 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap -1 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap 1 Maneuver Mov Cap -2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach _ HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Minor Lane/Major Mymt 69 69 0 stop 86 2 BO Minor2 4, 6 20 6 20 0 0 Stop Stop - None E T 0 a 86 2 I 86 2 23 527 524 168 162 162 365 362 7,12 6,52 622 6.12 5.52 612 5.52 3.518 4018 3 318 462 458 885 840 764 654 625 453 453 885 453 453 832 763 640 619 EB 14 1 B 3 5 1 3 5 1 d 0 0 Stop Stop Stop - None 86 2 3 Minorl 1 0 0 86 2 6 86 2 1 538 528 333 361 361 177 167 7 12 6 52 6.22 612 552 6.12 552 3.518 4 018 34318 2 218 454 456 709 1413 657 626 825 760 12 12 0 Free Art 286 286 0 Free 250 0 0 86 86 2 2 14 333 Major1 433 451 709 433 451 650 620 795 759 - WB 13 B NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR 1 1 0 Free None 1 133 9 1 133 9 0 0 0 Free Free Free • None 0 0 86 86 86 86 2 2 2 2 1 1 155 10 165 0 0 4 12 1413 NB 0.3 s Major2 334 0 4,12 2 218 1225 1225 3 SEA 01 INN • Capacity (vehfh) HCM Lane \'1C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1413 505 463 1225 001 -021960230001 76 141 13 79 0 A - B B A A 0 - 0 8 0 1 0 Rod Barn Sutxiimion 02107?2018 Delich A ,so Talcs Synchro 9 Light Report ct pm syn nnit:blank 6/27/2 HCM 2010 TWSC ' 6: ColoradoNVCR13 Page 101 of] Short Total AM Required Geometry Intersection Int Delay, slveh 0,9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT \A/BR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h Future Vol, veh/h Conflicting Pods, #/hr Sign Control PT Channe!lied Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grader % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, °X) My nt Flow Ma'or/Miner 4, 7 2 is 7 2 10 0 0 0 Stop Stop Stop - - None • 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 Stop Stop Stop - None 0 - 0 0 = - 0 92 92 92 92 92 92 2 2 2 2 2 2 8 2 11 1 1 0 M inor2 Minor l �i 15 15 0 Free 128 128 0 Free 1 1 0 Free - None 250 - 0 - 0 92 92 92 2 2 2 16 139 1 Malor1 2 2 0 Free • 4 195 195 0 Free fir 47 47 0 Free - None - 250 0 92 92 2 2 2 212 Major2 92 2 51 Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Sig 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Rdvvy Pot Cap -1 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % May Cap -1 Maneuver Mov Cap -2 Maneuver Slage 1 Stage 2 Approach 389 216 173 712 6,12 612 389 212 216 173 6-52 6 2 5,52 5 52 3.518 4 018 3 318 570 546 828 786 724 829 756 563 538 828 563 538 777 723 818 747 EB 395 388 140 212 0 0 172 112 223 216 712 652 6.2 412 6.12 5.52 6.12 5 52 - 3518 4018 3.318 2218 565 547 908 1358 830 756 780 724 • • 550 539 908 1358 550 539 820 747 766 723 WB Y NB • • • • 140 0 412 2118 1443 1443 SB RCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Minor Lane/Major Mvrn t 10-5 B 11 6 B NBL NBT NBP' EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR 0,8 01 Capacity (veh/h) FIC M Lane V/C Rata HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1358 0012 77 A 0 673 544 1443 0 031 0 004 0.002 - 10.5 11 6 7 5 0 BB A A 0 1 0 0 Rod Barn Subdivision 02/01120 I8 °dlich AssociatN Syrichw 9 Light Report st am cq u iral quo syn )ut:blank 6/27/2( HCM 2010 TWSC 6: ColoradoNVCR13 WCR32 Page 102 of 1 Short Total PM Required Geometry Intersection Int Delay, sileh Movement 2.8 EBL EBT EBR WBL WB T WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, vehlh Future Vol, vehlh Conflicting Peds, ##/hr Sign Control ITT Channellzed Storage Length Ven in Median Storage, it Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow Major/Minor 69 6 20 69 6 20 0 0 0 Stop Slop Stop • - None 86 2 80 Minor2 0 0 86 2 7 86 2 23 4, 3 5 1 3 5 1 0 {l 0 Stop Stop Stop - None 86 2 3 Minorl 0 0 86 2 6 86 2 1 Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hclwy Sig 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap -1 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Most Capa1 Maneuver Mov Cap -2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach 522 157 365 712 612 6.12 519 155 157 362 6,52 6.22 5.52 5.52 - 3 518 4 018 3 318 465 461 891 845 768 654 625 456 456 891 456 456 837 767 640 619 EB • 11 tit 4 12 286 1 1 133 9 12 286 1 1 133 9 0 o a 0 0 0 Free Free Free Free Free Free None - - None 250 - 250 b - 0 - 0 0 86 86 86 86 86 86 2 2 2 2 2 2 14 333 1 1 155 10 Majorl _ M ajor2 533 518 333 155 0 0 361 361 172 157 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 6.12 5 52 6 1 5 52 3.518 4.018 3 318 2 218 458 462 709 1425 657 626 830 768 437 457 709 1425 437 457 651 620 800 767 WB gal NB 334 0 0. 4.12 2 218 1225 1225 SB HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Minor Lane1Ma'or Mvmt Capacity (vehth) HCM Lane VIC Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 14 B 12.9 B NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR 1425 0.01 76 A 0 508 468 1225 0.217 0022 8001 14 129 79 0 BB A A 08 0.1 0 0.3 01 Red Bat r1 Subdivision 02/07/2018 Delich Associates Syncleira 9 Light Report St pm requirrld qeo Syn nit:blank 6/27/2( HCM 2010 TWSC 14: Driveway (Barnyard) & WCR32 Page 103 of 1 Short Total AM Intersection I nt Delay, s/veh Movement Lane Configurations Traffic Vol veh/h Future Vol, veh/h Conflicting Peds, #/hr Sign Control PT Channellzed Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow Major/Miner Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Ficiwy Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Sty 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap -1 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver Mov Cap -2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach I -+CM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Minor Lane/Major Mvrnt 044 EBT EBR WBL WBT 17 17 0 Free a 0 0 Free • None 0 0 85 2 20 Ma'or 1 0 EB 0 85 2 0 • s • 4 1 62 1 62 a 0 Free Free • None 0 0 85 85 2 2 1 73 Ma'or2 20 P 4,12 2 218 1596 1596 WB 0,1 NBLn1 EBT [BR WBL ' BT NBL NBR 1 1 0 Stop 0 0 0 85 2 1 M inorl 2 2 0 Stop None J 85 2 2 95 20 20 75 6.42 6.22 542 5.42 3 518 3.318 905 1058 1003 948 904 1058 904 1003 947 NB 8.6 A Capacity&&eh/1h) HCIV1 Lane VIC Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) Havt Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1 001 0.004 8,6 A 8 1596 0,001 73 0 A A 0 Red Barra Subdivision 02/07/2018 Defier! Associates Synchro 9 Light Report st am syn )ut: b l ank 6/27/2( HCM 2010 TWSC 14: Driveway (Barnyard? WCR32 Page 104 of Short Total PM Intersection Int Delay, sfveh Movement 0.3 EBT EBR WBL NBL NEAP Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h Future Vol, vehf h Conflicting Pied s, #Jhr Sign Control 1T Channellzed Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, it Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow Major/Minor Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdvvy Critical Hdwy Sty 1 Critical Hdwy tg 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap -1 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver Mov Cap -2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 93 93 0 Free .l 1 0 Free . None 0 0 85 2 109 Majorl } r C 85 2 1 • a 2 2 0 4 24 24 0 Free Free - None v 85 2 2 Major2 0 0 85 2 28 111 0 4.12 2.218 1479 1419 V l 0 0 Stop 0 0 0 85 2 0 Minorl 2 2 0 Stop None 85 2 2 143 110 110 33 6.42 6 22 5.42 5 42 3518 3318 850 943 915 989 849 943 849 915 988 = Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Minor Lane/Major Mvm,t Capacity (veh/h) H C M Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %iiie Q(eh) 0 0.6 NBLri1 EBT EBR WBL WBT 943 0.002 8.8 A 0 r 1479 0 002 7 4 0 A A 0 8.8 A Red Barn Subdivision 02/01/2018 Dolish Associates Synchro 9 Light Report st pr11 S'/n ) ut :blank. 6/27/2( HCM 2010 TWSC 3 East Frontage Road & WCR32 Page 105of1 Short Total AM Intersection int Delay, s/veh 4,6 Movement Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h Future Vol, vehth Conflicting Peds, #/hr Sign Control FAT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, Mvrit Flow Ma'or/Minor Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdvvy Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy tg 2 Follow-up He My Pot Cap -1 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver Mov Cap -2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach EBL EBT EBR 4) 6 19 11 6 19 11 0 0 0 Stop Stop Stop None e 85 2 7 Minor2 217 165 52 7.12 6.12 612 0 0 85 2 22 a 85 2 13 196 99 165 31 - 6.52 6.22 5.52 5,52 - 3.51840183,318 739 699 957 837 762 - 961 869 - 692 68,E 957 692 682 834 ■45 914 866 EB T IMP WBL WBT WBR 2 18 20 2 18 20 0 0 0 Stop Stop Stop None 85 2 2 whorl 0 0 85 85 2 2 21 24 213 197 30 30 183 167 NBL NBT NBR 3 3 0 Free • 85 2 4 Majorl 19 1 19 1 {l 0 Free Free - None 0 0 85 2 22 85 2 1 23 101 0 0 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 612 5.52 612 5.52 - 3.518 4.018 1318 2.218 744 699 1054 1491 987 870 819 760 702 682 1054 1491 702 682 984 867 766 743 WB NB a 7 SBL SBT SBR 28 28 0 Free 85 2 33 4* 83 83 0 Free Malor2 0 0 85 2 98 3 3 0 Free None 85 2 4 24 0 0 a 412 2 218 1591 1591 • BB • a • HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Minor LaneiMaloriV1vrnt 101 B 9.6 A NBL NBT NBREBLn1WBLn1 BLn1 BBL SBT SBR a 18 Capacity (vela/h0 FICM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCl '195th %cite O(veh) 1491 - - 750 830 1591 0.002 a 0.056 0 05 7 0 021 - 7A 0 - 10.1 96 7.3 0 A A - B A A A 0 - 0.2 02 C1 Red Barn Subdivision 02/07/2018 Deiioh Associates Synchro 9 Light Report st am syn mt:blank 127x 2€ HCM 2010 T ' 3: East Frontage Road WCR32 Page 106 of Short Total PM Intersection I nt Delay, sNeh Movement 4.1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, ve h/h Future Vol, vehth Conflicting Feeds, ft/hr Sign Control RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, Mvrrnl Flow for/Minor 3 3 0 Stop 85 2 4 Minor2 10 10 10 10 0 0 Stop Stop None 0 0 85 2 12 85 2 12 0 0 0 Stop 85 2 0 Minorl 4P 20 30 20 30 0 0 Stop Stop • None 27 27 0 Free 118 118 0 Free 0 - 0 0 - {1 85 85 85 85 85 2 2 2 2 2 24 35 32 139 1 1 1 0 Free None Ma'or1 Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stag 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap -1 MMCaneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Capa1 Maneuver Mov Cap -2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Minor Lane/Ma'or Mvmt Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane VIC Ratio HCIM Control Delay (s) Hervl Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 324 296 38 92 92 232 204 7.12 6.52 622 6 12 5.52 6,12 5.52 3,518 4018 3318 629 616 1034 915 819 771 733 568 591 1034 568 591 895 803 701 717 EB 10.2 B 307 2i97 139 203 203 104 94 7.12 6.52 6.22 6.12 5 52 612 5 52 - 1518 4 018 1318 645 615 909 199 733 902 817 609 590 909 609 590 781 717 862 801 WB 10.2 B NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 1570 0.02 73 A A 01 Red Barn Subdivision 02/07/2018 Deitch Associates SBL SBT SBR 722 747 1443 0 037 0.079 0 019 0 - 10,2 10 2 7.5 B B A 01 03 0.1 0 A 40 i az 4 12 2 218 1570 1570 NB 14 SA 23 23 0 Free 85 2 27 Ma'or2 140 4.12 2.218 1443 1443 SB 3 30 4 30 4 4 D Free Free None 0 0 85 2 35 r 85 2 5 Synchro 9 Light Report stpmsyn mt:blank 6/2712( HCM 2010 TWSC 3: East Frontage Road & WCR32 Page 107 of Short Total AM Required Geometry Intersection Int Delay, siveh 4,6► Movement Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veb/fit Future Vol, vehf h Conflicting Peds, #/hr Sign Control RT Channelized Storage Length Veh inn Median Storage, ft Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Hunt Flow Ma jor/Minor Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy PotCap-1 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver Mov Cap -2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach EBL EBT EBR 46 6 19 11 6 19 11 0 0 0 Slap Slap Stop None 85 2 7 Minor? a 0 0 85 2 22 85 2 13 217 196 99 165 165 52 31 7.12 6.52 6,22 612 552 6.12 5.5.E 3.518 4.018 3.318 739 699 957 837 162 961 869 • 693 683 957 693 683 835 746 914 867 EB WBL WBT WBR 2 18 20 2 18 20 0 0 0 Stop Slop Stop None 85 2 2 Minorl 0 0 85 85 2 2 21 24 213 197 23 30 30 183 167 712 6.52 622 6.12 5.52 6.12 552 - 3,518 4.018 3318 744 699 1054 987 870 819 760 NBL NBT NBR to, 3 19 1 3 19 1 0 D U Free Free Free None 250 85 2 4 Major 1 0 0 85 2 22 85 2 1 101 0 0 4.12 2218 '1491 703 683 1054 1491 703 683 984 868 767 744 WB nr NB - 4 SBL SBT SBR $6 28 83 28 83 0 0 Free Free 250 85 2 33 Mator2 0 0 85 2 98 3 3 0 Free None 85 2 4 24 0 0 4.12 2.218 1591 1591 • BB HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Minor LanelM a'or Mvmt Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane WC Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile O(veh) 10,1 B NBL 1491 0.002 7.4 A 0 9.6 A NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR 750 830 1591 - 0.056 0 057 0.021 - 10.1 9 6 7.3 B A A - 02 02 01 1 18 Red Barn Subdivision 02/01/2018 Delich Associates Synchro 9 Light Report st am required gee syn nrt:blank 6/27/2 HCM 2010T 3: East Frontage Road &WCR32 Page 108 of I Short Total PM Required Geometry Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 4,1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, vehf h Future Vol, vehf h Conflicting Reds, 1/hr Sign Control RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, if Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow Major/Minor 4 3 10 10 3 10 10 0 0 0 Stop Stop Stop None 85 2 4 M inor2 t 0 85 2 12 85 2 12 4 fl 20 30 fl 20 30 0 0 0 Stop Stop Stop - None 85 2 0 Minorl 0 0 85 2 24 Or 85 2 35 11 27 27 0 Free 250 85 2 32 Majorl 118 118 0 Free 1 1 0 Free - None 0 0 85 2 139 V 85 2 1 23 23 0 Free 250 85 2 27 Major2 t 30 30 0 Free 0 0 85 2 35 4 4 0 Free None 85 2 5 Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Sig 1 Critical Hdwy Sty 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap -1 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver Mov Cap -2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach 324 296 38 92 92 232 204 7.12 6.52 6.22 6.12 552 6.12 5.52 1518 4.018 3 318 629 616 1034 915 819 771 733 569 592 1031 569 592 896 804 702 718 EB 307 297 139 40 0 0 203 203 104 94 7.12 6.52 6.22 412 6.12 5 52 6.12 5 52 3.518 4.018 3.318 2 218 645 615 909 1570 799E 733 902 817 609 591 909 1570 609 591 783 718 862 802 WB NB 140 4.12 2.218 1443 1113 SB a 0 HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Minor Lane/Major Mvmt Capacity (vehfh) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 10.2 B 10.2 B NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 kn1 SBL SBT SBR 1570 0.02 73 A 01 722 748 1443 0037 0.079 0 019 102 102 7 5 B B A 01 03 01 1.4 3 Red Barn Subdivision 02/07/2018 Dolich Associates Synchro 9 Light Report st pm required goo syn )ut:blank lank 6/27/2( Page 109 of 1 APPENDIX H )ut:blank 6/27/2( I-# 12010 Signalized Intersection Summary 9: SH66 Colorado Paae IA0 of i Long Total AM Movement Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) Future Volume (veh/h) Number Initial 0 (Ob}, veh !Tied- Bike Ad j (A_pt)1 Parking Bus, Ad] Adj Sat Flow, vehlh/Nn Ad) Flow Rate, vehih Ad) No. of Lanes Peak Hour Factor Percent Heavy Veh, Cap, vehlh Arrive On Green Sat Flow,vehlh Grp Volume(v), me(v), ven/h Grp Sat FIow(s),vehlhlin + Serve(g s), s Cycle Q c leas (g_c), s Prop In Lane Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h Ratio(X) Avail Cap(c_a), vehlh HCM Platoon Ratio Upstream Filter(l) Uniform Delay (d), siveh Incr Delay 002}; &A/eh Initial 0 Delay(d3) sNeh %Ile BaokOfQ(50%)1vehlln LnG rp Belay(d) r s/Veh LnG r LOS Approach Vol i vehlh Approach Delay, siveh Approach LOS Timer l EBL EBT EBR WBL 4 — VV BT r ft SO 575 75 110 1105 50 575 75 110 1105 5 2 12 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 53 605 0 116 1163 1 2 1 1 2 0.95 0,95 0.95 0.9 5 0.95 2 2 2 2 2 276 1357 607 472 1448 0 05 0 38 0.00 0,08 0 41 1774 3539 1583 1774 3539 1 WBR NBL 60 60 16 0 1 UfJ 1.00 1863 0 1 d.45 2 648 0 00 1583 tt J NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR fr r 35 150 200 755 195 140 35 150 200 255 195 140 3 8 18 7 4 14 0 0 0 a o 1 0 1.UU 1.Q0 1.00 100 100 1 AO LOU 1.00 1 00 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 37 158 18 268 205 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.95 0.95 0 95 0.95 0.95 0 95 2 2 2 2 2 2 322 256 218 381 361 301 0.45 0 14 414 t} 10 01'9 0.00 1774 1863 1583 1774 1863 1583 53 605 0 116 1163 0 1774 1770 1583 1774 1770 1583 1,0 7.3 00 2:1 16.6 0.0 1.0 73 0.0 21 155 0.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 276 1357 607 472 1448 648 01 9 045 O 00 0 25 0.80 0_00 338 1357 607 488 1448 648 1.00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1.00 1,00 000 1.00 1 00 0 00 117 13,2 00 92 149 0.0 03 11 0.0 03 48 00 0.0 00 00 00 0.0 00 05 3 7 00 1 0 90 00 12.0 14 2 0.0 9 5 19 7 0,0 8 B A B 37 158 18 268 205 0 1774 1863 1583 1774 1863 1583 1O 4.6 0.6 6.0 57 0.0 10 4.6 06 60 5:7 0.0 1 00 1 00 1.00 1.00 322 256 218 381 361 307 011 0.62 0.08 0 70 0 57 0 00 390 325 276 381 361 307 1 00 1 00 1 0O 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 0O 1.00 1.00 0.00 195 23.3 216 19.3 210 0.0 02 2,4 02 58 21 00 00 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 On 05 2.5 0 3 1 9 3 1 00 19,6 25.7 21 7 25.1 23.0 0 0 B C C C C 658 1279 14,0 18.8 8 B 1 2 3 4 5 213 473 24.3 24.2 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7 5 28.0 5.8 16.1 5 0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4 0 7,0 4.0 6.0 4 0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), .), s 4 0 21 0 4.0 10.0 4.0 Max CI Clear Time (g_c+l 1)4 s 4 1 9 3 3 0 7 7 3 0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0 0 7 7 0 0 0 4 0,0 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctri Delay HCM 2010 LOS 19.0 B 6 29.5 7.0 21 0 186 20 7 9.0 40 5,0 80 00 8 129 60 9.0 66 03 Red Barn Subdivision 02/08/2018 Delich Associates Synchra 9 Light Report [t am syn nit:blank 6/27/2( Turing Rep►ort, Sorted By Phase 9: SH66 & Colorado Phase Number \oh t 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Page Hi of I Long Total AM Movement Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize Recall Mode Maximum Split (s) Maximum Split (%) Minimum Split (s) Yellow Time (s) All -Red Time (s) Minimum Initial Cs) Vehicle Extension (s) Minimum Gap (s) Time Before Reduce (s Time To Reduce (s) Walk Time Cs) Flash Dont Walk (s) Dual Entry Inhibit Max Start Time (s) End Time (s) Yield/Force Off (s) Yield/Force Off 170(s) Local Start Time (s) Local Yield (s) Local Yield 170(s) Intersection Summary Cycle Length Control Type Natural Cycle WBL Lead Yes None 8 13,3% 8 3 1 3.5 3 3 0 0 No Yes 0 8 4 4 52 56 56 EBTL Lag Yes Max 28 467% 15 5 2 5 3 3 0 0 NBL Lead Yes None 8 13,3% 8 3 1 4 3 3 0 0 Yes No Yes Yes 8 36 36 44 29 40 29 40 0 28 21 32 21 32 60 Actuated -Uncoordinated 60 Splits and Phases: 9: SH66 & Colorado 4\ 03 04 .. - _ ,� ati 05 06 07 0S SBTL Lag Yes None 16 267% 15 4 2 5 3 3 0 0 EBL Lead Yes None 8 13.3% 5 3 1 3.5 3 3 0 0 BTL Lag Yes Max 28 46,7% 15 5 2 5 3 3 0 0 SBL Lead Yes None 9 150% 3 1 4 3 3 0 0 NFL Lag Yes None 15 25,0% 15 4 2 5 3 3 0 0 Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 44 0 8 36 45 0 8 36 45 0 54 4 29 41 54 54 4 29 41 54 36 52 0 28 37 46 56 21 33 46 46 56 21 33 46 Rod Bain Subdivision 02/08/2018 Ddich Associates Synchs e 9 Light Report am syn n nit: blank 6/27/21 Queues 9: SH66 & Colorado Lane Group Dik -op **it 4- EBL Bi_ EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL t/. NBT NBA Page 112 of 1 Long Total AM \iv 47 4/ SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 53 605 79 116 1163 63 37 158 211 268 205 147 +vfc Ratio 018 0,45 0.11 0.26 0.80 0.08 010 0.52 0.48 0.65 0.41 0,25 Control Delay 7,9 15.3 0.3 8.2 22 2 0,2 13 8 29 8 7.9 25.0 212 2.5 Queue Delay 0 0 0,0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 (_0 0.0 an o.o no 0 0 Total Delay 7.9 15.3 0.3 8.2 22.2 0.2 13.8 29 8 7,9 25 0 23.2 2,5 Queue Length 501h (1t) 8 85 0 18 203 0 9 53 0 73 56 0 Queue Length 95th 00 21 125 0 38 #323 0 25 103 46 #149 #131 16 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2644 2413 1876 2403 Turn Bay Length (ft) 450 400 450 400 250 250 250 250 Base Capacity Nvph) 289 1355 729 444 1450 766 384 324 455 415 494 580 Starvation Cap keductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spiilback Cap Recluctn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap R eductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced vIc Ratio 018 0 45 0.11 0.26 0.80 0.08 0.10 0 49 0.46 0r65 0.41 0,25 Intersection Summary 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer Queue shown is maximum after two cycles, Red Barn Subdivision 02/08/2018 Sync hre 9 Light Report Delich Associates It am syn )ut: blank 6/27/2( HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 9t SH66 & Colorado Page 113ofl Long Total PM sbilV As% 4. 3/4\ t Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR N1BL NBT NOR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ''I tP r vitip a li r ifs =-'t -- p Traffic Volume (vehlh) 300 1020 150 80 860 180 80 260 110 95 165 110 Future Volume (vehf h) 300 1020 150 80 860 180 80 260 110 95 165 110 Number 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 18 7 4 14 Initial 0 (Qb)f veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 feed -Bile Adj(A-pbT) 1,00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1 00 1,00 1.00 Parking Bus, Ad] too 'I,00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1 00 1.00 1.00 100 1.00 1.00 Acj Sat Flow, veil/Kiln 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 316 1074 32 84 905 44 84 274 0 100 174 0 Ada No: of Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0 95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0 95 0 95 0,95 0.95 0 95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, vehth 401 1324 592 290 1078 482 391 360 306 322 378 321 Arrive On Green 014 0 37 0 37 0.07 0.30 0 30 0.07 019 0 00 0 08 0.20 0.00 Sat Flow, vehih 1774 3539 1583 1774 3539 1583 1774 1863 1583 1774 1863 1583 Grp Volume(v), vehfh 316 1074 32 84 905 44 84 274 0 100 174 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehih/In 1774 1770 1583 1774 1770 1583 1774 1863 1583 1774 1863 1583 G erve(g--s), s 6 7 161 0.8 1.9 14 1 1 2 2.2 8.2 0.0 2 :6 4 9 0.0 Cycle Q Cleatc); s 6.7 161 0.8 1 9 14 1 1 2 2.2 8)2 0 0 2.6 4.9 0,0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1,00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehth 401 1324 592 290 1078 482 391 360 306 322 378 321 VEC Ratio(X) 0.79 (181 005 0.29 084 009 021 0 76 000 0.31 0.46 000 Avail Cap(c_a), vehch 401 1324 592 323 1078 482 417 378 321 331 378 321 HC IV1 Platoon Ratio 1 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 00 1.01 1.00 1 00 1.00 1 100 1.00 1 00 Upstream F iPter(O) 1 00 1 00 100 1.00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 0 00 1.00 1.00 000 Uniform Delay (d), siveh 131 16 6 11 8 13.8 19 2 14 7 17 0 22.6 0.0 17 2 20 7 0.0 Incr. Delay (d.2), s/veh 10 2 5 5 0 2 0.5 7 9 0 4 0 3 8-4 00 0 5 0 9 00 Initial 0Delay(d3),sIveh 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 00 00 00 0.0 0.0 00 00 00 %Ile BackOfo(50%),veh/ln 4.3 8.8 0 4 0.9 81 0.6 1,1 5.0 0.0 1 3 2 6 0 0 LnGrp Delay(d),sfveh 23 3 221 12.0 14.3 27 1 15.1 17 3 30 9 0.0 17 7 21 6 0.0 LnGrp LOS C C B 13 C B B C B C Approach Vol, vehfh Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS 1422 221 C 1033 25 5 C 358 27.7 C Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 274 20,2 C Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G-4-Y+Pc), s 6.9 281 7.1 17 0 11 0 24 0 7.7 16.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 7,0 4,0 6 0 4 0 7 0 4 0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 20.0 4.0 11 0 7 0 17 0 4.0 11 0 Max 0 Clear Time (g —c+11), s 3.9 18 1 4 2 6 9 8 7 161 4 6 10.2 Green Ext Time (p —c), s 0 0 1 6 0.0 0 9 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 2 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 23 7 HCM 2010 LOS C Re.d Barn Subdivision 02%08/20'!8 Synclio 9 Light Repert [Mich Associates It pm s n )ut: blank 6/27/2( Timing Report, Sorted By Phase 9: SH66 Colorado Page 1 14 of 1 Long Total PM Phase Number Movement LeadfLag Lead -Lag Optimize km -J. Mtitctll Iwl�. Ut,' Maximum Split (s) Maximum Split (%) tvlinirnum Split (s' Yellow Time (s) All -Red Time (s) Minimum Initial (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Minimum Gap (s) Time Before Reduce (s) Time To Reduce (s) Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Dual Entry Inhibit Max Start Time (s) End Time (s) Yield/Force Off (s) Yield/Force Off 170(s) Local Start Time (s) Local Yield (s) Local Yield 170(s) Intersection Summary Cycle Length Control Type Natural Cycle f \pp 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 WBL Lead Yes None 13 3% 8 3 1 35 3 3 0 0 No Yes 0 4 4 49 53 53 EBTL Lag Yes MdX 27 45 0% 15 5 2 S 3 3 a a Yes Yes B 35 28 28 57 17 17 NBL Lead Yes IN one 8 13.3% 8 3 1 4 3 3 0 0 No Yes 35 43 39 39 24 28 28 60 Actuated -Uncoordinated 60 Splits and Phases: 9: SH66 & Colorado col 1 D 3 04 .0fr O5 D6 \0.07 �08 - OIL Lag Yes None 1e 17 283% 15 4 2 5 3 3 0 0 Yes Yes 43 0 54 54 32 43 43 EBL Lead Yes None 11 18 3% B 3 1 35 3 3 0 B No Yes 0 11 7 7 49 56 56 WBTL Lag Yes IVI dX 24 40 0% 15 5 2 5 3 3 0 0 Yes Yes 11 35 28 28 0 17 17 SBL Lead Yes None 8 13.3% 8 3 1 4 3 3 0 0 No Yes 35 43 39 39 24 28 28 NUTL Lag Yes None 17 283% 15 4 2 5 3 3 0 0 Yes Yes 43 0 54 54 32 43 43 Red Bain Subdivision 02/08,20 18 Del ich Associates Synchro 9 Light Report It jiin syn nr.it:blank 6/27/2( Queues 9: SH66 Colorado Page 115 of Long Total PM Lane Grou? Lane Group new (vph) v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay Queue Length 50th (Ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Intersection Summar'g of* —por weal, ie 4-5 ka t /De \sr ir EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT U'BR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 316 1074 158 84 905 189 84 274 116 100 174 116 0 82 0 77 0.21 0 28 0 82 030 0.21 0.74 0.24 0.32 0447 0.24 30.7 221 22 9 9 27 2 4.1 14.2 37.0 1.3 15.'9 25.9 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 040 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 303 22.1 2,2 9 9 27 2 4.1 14.2 37 0 1.3 15.9 25.9 1.3 59 185 0 13 160 0 20 94 0 24 56 0 #183 #296 21 31 #257 35 45 #195 3 51 108 3 2644 2413 1876 2403 450 400 450 400 250 250 250 250 385 1403 748 295 1105 631 407 387 502 313 387 502 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.82 0.77 0.21 0.28 0.82 0.30 0.21 0.71 023 0.32 0,45 0.23 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Red Barn Subdivision 02/0812018 Delich Associates Synchro 9 Light Report Itpmsyn t blank 6/27/2( HCM 2010 TWSC 12: Colorado & Red Barn Page 116 of 1 Long Total AM Intersection nt Delay, s/veh Movement 2.1 EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, ve h/h Future Vol, vehfh Conflicting Reds, Mr Sign Control RT Channellzed Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow Major/Minor 15 15 0 Slop 0 0 0 95 2 16 Minor2 95 95 0 Stop None 95 2 100 30 235 30 235 0 0 Free Free None 250 0 - 0 95 95 2 2 32 247 Malorl $.6 470 5 470 5 0 0 Free Free - None 0 0 95 2 495 Major2 95 2 5 Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy St9 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pol Cap -1 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver Mov Cap -2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach 808 497 500 0 497 311 6.42 6.22 4.12 5A2 5.42 3.518 3.318 2.218 350 573 1064 611 743 339 573 1064 339 611 721 EB re NB SB HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Minor LaneiMa jor Mvmt 13.8 B 1 NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR 0 Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane VAC Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1064 003 8.5 A 0.1 - 524 0221 138 B 0,8 Red Bain Subdivision U2/Q8/2O18 Delich Associates Synchro ro 9 Light Report itamsyn rut: blank 6/2 7/ HCM 2010 T 12: Colorado & Red Barn Page 117 of Long Total PM intersection int Delay, stveh Movement 1.6 EBL EBR NBL NAT SBT SBR Lane Configurations TrafficVol; veh/h Future Vol, veh/h Conflicting Pods, ON Sign Control PT Channelized Storage Length Vets in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow Major/Miner Conflicting Flow AU Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap -1 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver Mov Cap -2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach tte 10 10 0 Slop 0 0 0 95 2 11 ithinor2 60 60 0 Stop None 95 2 63 f 105 615 105 615 0 0 Free Free - None 250 _ 0 - 0 95 95 2 2 111 647 Majorl 1194 326 337 0 326 868 642 6.22 412 5.42 52 3.518 1318 2,218 206 715 1222 131 411 187 715 1222 187 731 374 EB a NB 300 300 0 20 20 0 Free Free - None 0 0 95 2 316 Ma SB r 95 2 21 0 HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Minor Lar,e/Major Mvmt Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) FICM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 133 B 12 NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR 1222 009 82 A 0.3 509 - 0145 133 B 05 0 Red Barn Subdivision 02/08/2018 Delich Associates Synchia 9. Light Report It pm syn )ut:blank 6/27/2( HCM 2010 TWSC 14: Colorado & Barnyard r Page 118of1 Long Total AM Intersection I rat Delay, sfveh Movement 1.5 EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h Future Vol, veh,'h Conflicting Feeds, #Ihr Sign Control RT Channelized nneiized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow Major/Minor Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical H d y Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap -1 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver May Cap -2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach H C1 Control Delay, s HCM LOS Minor Lane/Major %ant 20 20 0 Stop 0 0 95 2 21 Minor2 79Q 445 284 6.42 5.42 5.42 3.518 390 646 764 383 383 646 750 EB 13 H 55 55 0 Stop None 95 2 58 445 6.22 20 230 20 230 fl fl Free Free None 2500 - 0 95 95 2 2 21 242 lajorl 447 0 Y 4.12 3 318 2.218 613 1113 613 1113 NB 0.1 NBL NBTEBLni SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1113 I-1CM Lane VAC Ratio 0 019 HCM Control Delay (s) 8.3 HCM Lane LOS A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 528 0.15 13 B • O5 r 420 420 0 Free 5 5 0 Free - None 0 a 95 2 442 Major2 SB 0 1.0 JOI 95 2 5 Red Barn Subdivision 02/08/2018 Delich Associates Synchio 9 Light Report It am syn )ut:blank 6/27/2( HCM 2010 TWSC 14: Colorado & Barn and Page 119 of 1 Long Total PM Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement Lane Configurations Traflk Vol, veh/h Future Vol, vehlh Conflicting Peds, #/hr Sign Control RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, ft Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow Majoritvlinor Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Sty 1 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap -1 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon hiked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver Mov Cap -2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Minor Lane/Major Mvmt 1.2 EBL EBR ttlif 15 15 0 Stop 0 0 0 95 2 16 35 35 0 Stop None 95 2 37 Net. NBt T 60 565 60 565 0 0 Free Free - None 250 0 - 0 95 95 2 2 63 595 Minor2 �or1 1034 313 313 721 • 326 0 6.42 6.22 412 5.42 542 3.518 3318 2.218 257 727 1234 741 482 244 727 1234 244 74+1 457�( EB 139 B NB 0.8 NBL NBTEBLn1 SBT SBR SBT SBR tio 285 25 285 25 0' 0 Free Free None 0 0 95 2 300 Majar2 SB 0 95 2 26 0 Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane WC Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS H M 95th %tile Q(veh) 1234 456 0.x}51 0.115 8.1 13.9 A - B 0.2 04 Red Ban Subdivision 02/08/2018 relicts Associates Synchre 9 Light Report It pm syn )ut:blan 6/27/2( H M 2010 TWSC 6: Colorado/WCR13 Colorado/W13WCR32 Page 120 of 1 Long Total AM Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 4.3 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh#h Future Vol, vehfh Conflicting Peds, #/hr Sign Control t T Ch►annelizedl Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvrnt Flow Ma'or/Minor 90 90 0 Stop 250 95 2 95 Minor2 5 130 5 130 0 fl Stop stop None 0 0 95 2 5 95 2 137 5 5 a Stop 95 2 5 M wnorl 5 5 5 5 a 0 Stop Stop None r a a 95 2 5 • 95 2 5 t+ 50 195 5 50 195 5 0 0 0 Free tree Free - None 250 0 0 95 95 95 2 2 2 53 205 5 Majorl 7 5 290 95 5 290 95 0 0 0 Free Free Free None 250 250 0 0 95 95 95 2 2 2 5 305 '100 Ma or2 Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdvvy Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap -1 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % May Cap 1 Maneuver Mov Cap -2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach told 632 305 316 316 318 316 712 6.52 6 12 5 52 612 5.52 351840183318 392 398 735 695 655 693 655 6 22 372 380 735 372 380 666 653 654 627 EB 700 313 387 712 6,12 612 'no 313 316 6.52 552 5 52 3.518 4 018 354 399 698 657 637 655 208 6.22 05 0 0 4 12 3318 2218 832 1256 275 381 832 1256 275 381 669 629 512 653 WB a NB a • • 41.2 2218 1360 1360 SB • HCM Control Delay4 s HCM LOS Minor Lane/Major Mumt Capacily (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) H C M Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile O(ve h) 14 B 143 B L6 01 NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2t BLn1 SBL SBT SBR 1256 0 042 8 A 0 1 372 710 402 1360 8 255 0 2 O39 0 004 18 113 143 77 CBB A 1 07 01 0 Rod Bacii Subdivision 0210812018 Delich Associates Synchco 9 Light Report I. am ' /fl it:blank 6/27/2( HCM 010 TWSC 6: ColoradoANCR13 WCR32 Page 121 of ] Long Total PM Intersection Int Delay, stveh Movement 11.5 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, vehth Future Vol, vehth Conflicting Penis, #/hr Sign Control RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, if Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, Mvmt Flow Major/Minor Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hi Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap -1 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % rViov Cap -1 Maneuver Mov Cap -2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach 150 5 100 150 5 100 0 o 0 Stop Stop Stop • None 250 0 0 95 95 95 2 2 2 158 5 105 Minor2 997 994 216 226 226 771 768 7.12 6.52 6,22 612 5.52 6.12 5.52 3.518 4,018 3.318 223 245 824 777 717 393 411 k 197 215 824 197 215 686 714 339 363 EB 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 4 0 Stop Stop Stop None 95 2 5 Minor' 0 0 95 2 5 95 2 5 tw• 150 425 5 150 425 5 0 0 0 Free Free Free None 250 0 0 95 95 95 2 2 2 158 447 5 Ma jorl 1048 992 450 216 0 0 766 766 282 226 712 6.52 622 4.12 6.12 5.52 612 5 52 - 3.518 4.018 3.318 2 218 206 246 609 1354 395 r 41 725 717 160 216 609 1354 160 216 - 349 364 625 714 WB NB 11 111 5 205 100 5 205 100 U 0 0 Free Free Free - None 250 - 250 0 0 95 95 95 2 2 2 5 216 105 Ma Jar2 453 0 412 2218 1 108 1108 SB r HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Minor Lane/Major NAvmt 46.4 E 21.1 C 21 NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR 0.1 Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane' WC Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS RCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1354 0,117 8 A 04 197 726 240 1108 - 0 801 0152 0 066 0.005 713 10.8 21.1 83 • F BC A 5.6 05 0.2 0 Red Barn Subdivision 02/08/2018 Delic h Associates Synchro 9 Light Report It pm syn )ut:blank 6/27/2( HCM 2010 TWSC 16: Barnyard WCR32 2 - - d Page 122 of I Long Total AM Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 1.7 FBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h Future Vol, vehlh Conflicting Peds, #/hr Sign Control T Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow Major/lMlinor Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap -1 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver Mov Cap -2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach 200 10 200 10 a 0 Free Free None 0 8 95 2 211 Majorl 95 2 11 8 0 EB 10 140 10 140 0 0 Free Free None 250 0 95 95 2 2 11 147 Major2 221 0 4.12 2.218 1348 1348 WB 35 35 0 Stop 0 0 0 95 2 37 Minorl 25 25 0 Stop None 95 2 26 384 216 216 168 6.42 612 5.42 5.42 3 518 1 318 619 824- 828 862 614 824 614 820 855 NB H C M Control Delay, s HCM LOS Minor Lane/Major Mvrnt a 05 NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT 108 B Capacity (veh/h) 681 H C M Lane Vie Ratio 0.092 H C M Control Delay (s) 10 8 HCM Lane LOS B H C M 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 3 1348 0008 77 A 0 Red Barn Subdivision 02/08/2018 Delich Associates Synchro 9 Light Report It am syn )ut: blank 6/27/2( HCM 2010 TWSC 16: Barnyard &WCR32 Page 123 of Long Total PM Intersection I nt Delay/ siveh Movement 1,1 EST EBR ML WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h Future Vol, vehfh Conflicting Peds, #/hr Sign Control ITT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow Major/Minor Conflicting Flow Ail Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Sig 1 Critical Hdwy Sty 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap -1 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap- I Maneuver Mov Cap -2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 /Approach t• 240 35 240 35 0 a Free Free None a 0 a 95 2 253 95 2 37 Ma orl 0 0 EB 30 225 30 225 0 0 Free Free - None 250 0 0 95 95 2 2 32 237 r2 289 0 4.12 2 218 1273 1273 'B 20 20 0 Stop 0 0 0 95 2 21 Minorl 15 15 0 Stop None E 95 2 16 571 271 271 300 6.42 6.22 5.42 5.42 3518 3318 482 768 775 752 470 768 470 775 733 NB FICIM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Minor Lane/Major Mvmt 0 o.9 NBLn1 FBT EBR WBL WBT 11.8 B Capacity (veh/h) 564 H C M Lane V/C Ratio 0.065 HCM Control Delay (s) 11 8 HCM Lane LO B Hayti 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - 1273 - 0 025 - 79 A - 01 Red Barn Subdivision 02/08/2018 Delich Associates Synchro 9 Light Report It per, syn mt:blank 6/27/2( HCM 2010 T 3: East Frontage Road WCR32 Page 124 of l Long Total AM Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 6.9 EBL EBT EBR 1 L BT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h Future Vol, vehth Conflicting Peds, #ihr Sign Control RI Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow Mator/Minor '10 35 15 10 35 15 0 0 0 Stop Slop Stop None 95 2 11 Minor2 0 0 95 2 37 95 2 16 70 40 75 70 40 75 4 0 D Stop Stop Stop None 95 2 74 fvlinorl 0 0 95 2 42 • 95 2 79 5 5 0 Free 250 95 2 5 Maori 30 30 30 30 0 0 Free Free None 0 0 95 2 32 r 95 2 32 t* 55 120 5 55 120 5 fl 0 0 Free Free Free - - None 250 0 0 95 95 95 2 2 2 58 126 5 Ma'0r2 Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Sig 1 Critical Hdwy Sty 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap -1 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver Mov Cap -2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach 363 319 129 245 245 118 74 7,12 6.52 622 6,12 5,52 6.12 5.52 3.518 4.018 3,318 593 598 921 759 703 887 833 501 573 921 501 573 756 677 775 830 EB 329 305 47 132 58 58 271 247 - 712 6.52 622 4.12 612 552 6.12 5 52 - 3 518 4.018 3.318 2.218 624 608 1022 1453 954 847 735 702 565 583 1022 1453 565 583 951 844 657 676 WB NB 63 4.12 2.218 1540 1540 BB . HM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Minor LanetMa(or Mvmt 11.5 B 12.2 B NBL NBT NBREBLn1WBLn1 BLn1 BL SBT SBR 0,6 2.3 Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %the Q(veh) 1453 0,004 7.5 A 0 616 696 1540 - 0 103 0.28 0 038 115 122 74 B B A 03 11 01 Red Barn Subdivision 02/08/2018 Mich Associates Synchro 9 Light Reporl It am syn nut:blank 6/27/2( HCM 2010 TWSC 3: East Frontage Road WCR32 Page 125 of l Long Total PM Intersection int Delay, siceh Movement Lane Configurations Traffic Vol veh/h Future Vol, veh/h Conflicting Pods, #/hr Sign Control PT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow MajorlMinor Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hwy Critical Hdwy Sig 1 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap -1 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, Mov Cap -1 Maneuver IVIov Cap -2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach 6.6 EBL EBT EBR 5 25 15 5 25 15 0 0 0 Stop Stop Stop None 95 2 5 M inor2 0 0 95 2 26 95 2 16 605 586 50 239 239 366 347 7.12 6.52 6.22 6.12 5.52 6.12 552 - 3.518 4.018 3.318 410 422 1018 764 708 653 635 316 381 1018 316 381 743 656 537 618 EB WBL WBT WBR 4+ 50 40 75 50 40 75 0 0 0 Stop Stop Stop None 95 2 53 Minorl 0 0 95 2 42 r 1. 95 2 79 NBL NBT NBR 40 40 0 Free sr" 170 80 170 80 0 0 Free Free - None 50 2 0 0 95 95 95 2 2 2 42 179 84 Ma'or1 566 547 221 53 305 305 261 242 7.12 6 52 6.22 4.12 6.12 5 52 612 5.52 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 435 445 819 1553 705 662 744 705 • 376 401 819 1553 376 401 686 644 652 654 WB NB a T SQL SBT SBR 90 45 5 90 45 5 4 0 0 Free Free Free None 250 95 2 95 Major2 263 4.12 2.218 1301 1301 SB 0 0 95 2 47 • 95 2 5 • HC 1 Control Delay, s H OM LOS Minor Lane/Major Mvmt 136 B 157 C NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR I 5.1 Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1553 0.027 7.4 A 01 468 509 1301 • 0 101 11341 0.073 - 13.6 153 8 B C A 03 15 01 Red Barn Subdivision 02/08/2W 8 Bolick Associates Syrichro 9 Light Report Itpn7syn nit:blank 6/27/2( Page 126 of 1 APPENDIX I nit: blank 6/27/ Page 1 of PPP Landwhen 1 , i r , �I�� t y� � u� GEM MAS f E E COMPANY PREVENT initiating FRAUD i Please remember to call a member of our closing team a wire transfer ro yr providing wiring instructions. � � � � }'� ` R !' rr� �r -- 'yd Arc it t, ,t - —— Land Title Guarantee Company Customer Distribution Our Order Number: F +2515455 -7 Date: 05-25-2018 Property Address{ VACANT LAND, MEAD, CO 80542 For Closing Assistance Closer's Assistant For Title Assistance Jean Urban Megan Klaus Lariner►,,"eld County Title Team 2595 CANYON BLVD #340 2595 CANYON BLVD #340 772 WHALERS WAY #100 BOULDER, CO 80302 BOULDER, CO 80302 FORT COLLINS, CO 80525 720-565-6202 (phone) 720-406-2084 (phone) 970-282-3640 (phone) 866-360-5891 (fax) 303-393-3942 (fax) 970-282-3652 (fax) jurban@ltgc.com mkl aus@Itgc, corm custornercare@ltgc.com Company License: C044565 Contact License: C0185467 PLEASE CONTACT YOUR CLOSER OR CLOSER'S ASSISTANT FOR WIRE TRANSFER INSTRUCTIONS Buyer/Borrower Attorney for Buyer PROSPER LAND AND DEVELOPMENT LLC PACKARD AND DIERKING LLC Delivered via: Electronic Mail Attention: REBECCA HALL WATERSTREET 2595 CANYON BLVD #200 BOULDER, CO 80302 303-447-0450 (work) 303-447-0451 (work fax) becky@packatddierking.com Delivered via: Electronic Mail SellerlOwner LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY 13-32 DEVELOPMENT LLC Attention: STAN URBAN Delivered via: Electronic Mail 2595 CANYON BLVD #340 BOULDER, CO 80302 303-444-4101 (work) 303-442-7913 (work tax) surban t ltgc.com Delivered via: Electronic Mail Attorney for Seller PROJECT MANAGER FOR 13-32 DEVELOPMENT, LLC LYONS CADDIS Attention: ANDREW BATSON Attention: CAMERON GRANT 303-641-5058 (work) 515 KIMBARK STREET 2ND FLOOR andrew(E yourwayhome.com PO BOX 978 Delivered via: Electronic Mail LONGMONT, CO 80502 303-817-8475 (phone) 303-776-9900 (work) 303-776-9100 (work fax) cgrant@lyonsgaddis.com Delivered via: Electronic Mail iut:blank 6/27/2( Page 2 of LandT& GUARAMTFE COI'4PAN Y k' i Fh r 2; - Land Title Guarantee Company Estimate of Title Fees Order Number: FCC25154556-7 Date. 05-25-2018 Property Address: VACANT LAND, MEAD, Co 80542 Buyer/Borrower: PROSPER LAND AND DEVELOPMENT, LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY Seller. 13-32 DEVELOPMENT LLC. A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY Visit Land Title's website at vvww.ltgc.com for directions to any of our offices. Esdmate of me insurance ll , i ALTA Deletion Endorsement Tax Owners of Certificate Policy 06-17-06 Standard 100,31-06 (Sht Exception(s) #9 Term Rate) $1,481.00 $65,00 $247.C10 $52,00 If Land Title Guarantee Company will be closing this transaction, the fees listed above will be collected at closing. Total $1,845600 'HANK YOU FOR YOUR ORDER! e. )ut:blank 6/27/2( Page 3 of ALTA COMMITMENT Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule A Order Number: FCC25154556-7 Customer Ref -Loan No.: Property Address: VACANT LAND, MEAD, CO 80542 1.. Effective Date: 05-21-2018 At 05:00:00 2. Policy to be Issued and Proposed Insured: "ALTA" Owners s Policy 06-17-05 Proposed Insured: PROSPER LAND AND DEVELOPMENT, LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY $1,054,100.00 3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment and covered herein is: A FEE SIMPLE 4. Title to the estate or interest covered herein is at the effective date hereof vested in: 13-32 DEVELOPMENT LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 5. The Land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: PARCEL A LOT G, RECORDED EXEMPTION NO. 1207-24-01 RE 17-0048, RECORDED AUGUST 9, 2017 AT RECEPTION NO, 4325830, BEING A PART OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO PARCEL B LOT B, RECORDED EXEMPTION NO. 1207-24-04 REC D-0097, RECORDED OCTOBER 19, 2017 AT RECEPTION NO, 43455074 BEING A PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO Copyright it 2006-2018 American Land The Association. All Rights Reserved The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Tide Association. nut:blank 6/27/2( Page 4 of ALTA COMMITMENT Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule B, Part I (Requirements) Order Number: FCC25154556-7 The following are the requirements must he met: This proposed Insured must notify the Company in writing of the name of any party not referred to in this Commitment who will obtain an interest in the Land or who will make a loan on the Land. The Company may then make additional Requirements or Exceptions. Pay the agreed amount for the estate or interest to be insured. Pay the premiums, fees, and charges for the Policy to the Company, Documents satisfactory to the Company that convey the Title or create the Mortgage to be insured, or both, must be properly authorized, executed, delivered, and recorded in the Public Recordsd 1. (ITEM INTENTIONALLY DELETED) 2. (ITEM INTENTIONALLY DELETED) 3. (ITEM INTENTIONALLY DELETED) NOTE: STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY FOR 13-32 DEVELOPMENT LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY RECORDED DECEMBER 28, 2017 AT RECEPTION NO, 4363508 AUTHORIZES JON BENSON AND/OR CYNDI BENSON AS MEMBERS. 4. A FULL COPY OF THE FULLY EXECUTED OPERATING AGREEMENT AND ANY AND ALL AMENDMENTS THERETO FOR 13-32 DEVELOPMENT LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY MUST BE FURNISHED TO LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY. SAID AGREEMENT MUST DISCLOSE WHO MAY CONVEY, ACQUIRE, ENCUMBER, LEASE OR OTHERWISE DEAL WITH INTERESTS IN REAL PROPERTY FOR SAID ENTITY, NOTE: ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MAY BE NECESSARY UPON REVIEW OF THIS DOCUMENTATION, 5. DULY EXECUTED AND ACKNOWLEDGED STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY SETTING FORTH THE NAME OF PROSPER LAND AND DEVELOPMENT LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AS A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY. THE STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY MUST STATE UNDER WHICH LAWS THE ENTITY WAS CREATED, THE MAILING ADDRESS OF THE ENTITY, AND THE NAME AND POSITION OF THE PERSON(S) AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE INSTRUMENTS CONVEYING, ENCUMBERING, OR OTHERWISE AFFECTING TITLE TO REAL PROPERTY ON BEHALF OF THE ENTITY AND OTHERWISE COMPLYING WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 38-30-172, CRS, NOTE: THE STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY MUST BE RECORDED WITH THE CLERK AND RECORDER. NOTE: THE OPERATING AGREEMENT FOR PROSPER LAND AND DEVELOPMENT, LLC DISCLOSES SERGE GOLDBERG AND WILLIAM PARKER EDGINGTON AS THE MANAGERS THAT ARE AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE LEGAL INSTRUMENTS ON BEHALF OF SAID ENTITY. BOTH MANAGERS MUST EXECUTE DOCUMENTS, 6, (ITEM INTENTIONALLY DELETED) 7. WRITTEN CONFIRMATION THAT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY FOR COPPER HOMES LIMITED, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY RECORDED DECEMBER O5 )ut:blank 6/27/2( Page 5 of ALTA COMMITMENT O I d Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule B, Part I (Requirements) Order Number: FCC25154556-1 The Following are the requirements must be met: 2016 AT RECEPTION NO. 4258905 IS CURRENT NOTE: SAID INSTRUMENT DISCLOSES ANDREW BAT SO N, AS MANAGER ANDIOR KIM CALLAHAN, AS AUTHORIZED AGENT AS AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE INSTRUMENTS CONVEYING, ENCUMBERING OR OTHERWISE AFFECTING TITLE TO REAL PROPERTY ON BEHALF OF SAID ENTITY, IF THIS INFORMATION IS NOT ACCURATE, A CURRENT STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY MUST BE RECORDED. 8. (ITEM INTENTIONALLY DELETED) 9. (ITEM INTENTIONALLY DELETED) 10. WARRANTY DEED FROM 13-32 DEVELOPMENT LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY TO P ROSPER LAND AND DEVELOPMENT, LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY CONVEYING S UBJECT PROPERTY, NOTE: ALL PARTIES WILL BE REQUIRED TO SIGN A SATISFACTORY LIEN AFFIDAVIT AT CLOSING 11, (ITEM INTENTIONALLY DELETED) 12 RELEASE OF DEED OF TRUST DATED DECEMBER 15, 2017 FROM 13-32 DEVELOPMENT LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY TO THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF WELD COUNTY FOR THE U SE OF FLATIRON MORTGAGE LENDING, LLC TO SECURE THE SUM OF $1,283,638.00 RECORDED DECEMBER 27, 2017, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 4363285. (AFFECTS PARCEL B) 13, RELEASE OF DEED OF TRUST DATED DECEMBER 15, 2017 FROM 13-32 DEVELOPMENT LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY TO THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF WELD COUNTY FOR THE USE OF ARB 2011, LLC TO SECURE THE SUM OF $4,318,585.00 RECORDED DECEMBER 28, 2017, U NDER RECEPTION NO, 4363509, RERECORDED JANUARY 17, 2018 AT RECEPTION NO. 4368328. (AFFECTS PARCEL A) NOTE: ITEMS 1-3 OF THE STANDARD EXCEPTIONS WILL BE DELETED FROM THE OWNER'S POLICY. NOTE: UPON THE APPROVAL OF THE COMPANY AND THE RECEIPT OF A NOTARIZED FINAL LIEN AFFIDAVIT, ITEM NO. 4 OF THE STANDARD EXCEPTIONS ON THE LOAN POLICY WILL BE DELETED. U PON THE APPROVAL OF THE COMPANY AND THE RECEIPT OF A NOTARIZED FINAL LIEN AFFIDAVIT, ITEM NO, 4 OF THE STANDARD EXCEPTIONS ON THE OWNER'S POLICY, WILL BE AMENDED AS FOLLOWS` ITEM NO, 4 OF THE STANDARD EXCEPTIONS IS DELETED AS TO ANY LIENS OR FUTURE LIENS RESULTING FROM WORK OR MATERIAL FURNISHED AT THE SPECIFIC, DIRECT REQUEST, AND WITH THE ACTUAL KNOWLEDGE OF 13-32 DEVELOPMENT LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY. OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SHALL HAVE NO LIABILITY FOR ANY LIENS ARISING FROM WORK OR MATERIAL FURNISHED AT THE SPECIFIC, DIRECT REQUEST, AND WITH THE ACTUAL KNOWLEDGE OF PROSPER LAND AND DEVELOPMENT LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED )ut:bl ank 6/2 7/2( Page 6 of ALTA COMMITMENT Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule B, Park I (Requirements) Order Number: F0C25154556-7 The following are the requirements must be met; LIABILITY COMPANY. NOTE: ITEM 5 OF THE STANDARD EXCEPTIONS WILL BE DELETED IF LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY CONDUCTS THE CLOSING OF THE CONTEMPLATED TRANSACTION(S) AND RECORDS THE DOCUMENTS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH.. NOTE: UPON PROOF OF PAYMENT OF ALL TAXES, ITEM 6 WILL BE AMENDED TO READ, TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS FOR THE YEAR 2018 AND SUBSEQUENT YEARS, A LIEN NOT YET DUE AND PAYABLE, n it: blank 6/27/2( Page 7 of Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule B, Part II (Exceptions) Order Number: FCC 25154556-7 This commitment does not republish any covenants, condition, restriction, or limitation contained in any document referred to in this commitment to the extent that the specific covenant, conditions, restriction, or limitation violates state or federal law based on race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, handicap, familial status, or national origin. 1. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records but that could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or that may be asserted by persons in possession of the Land. 2. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records. 3. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public Records. 4, Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the Public Records, 5, Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date of the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6. (a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. 7. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water. 8. RIGHT OF WAY FOR COUNTY ROADS 30 FEET ON EITHER SIDE OP SECTION AND TOWNSHIP LINES, AS ESTABLISHED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR WELD COUNTY, RECORDED OCTOBER 14, 1889 IN BOOK 86 AT PAGE 273, 9, RIGHT OF THE PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE THEREFROM, SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PREMISES HEREBY GRANTED, AND A RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES, AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED JULY 02 1877 IN BOOK 20 AT PAGE 160. 10. RIGHT OF WAY FOR HO LETT DITCH AS DISCLOSED BY MAP AND STATEMENT RECORDED OCTOBER 21r 1910 AT RECEPTION NO. 160054, 11-. RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT AS GRANTED TO AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH CO, IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED NOVEMBER 27, 1936, AT RECEPTION NO, 751521, IN BOOK 1002 AT PAGE 16, 12. RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT AS GRANTED TO UNION RURAL ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC. �N INSTRUMENT RECORDED NOVEMBER 18, 1969, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 43_9384. )ut: bl a.rl k 6/27P1 1 Page 8 of Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule 8, Part II (Exceptions) Order Number: FCC25154556-7 13. OIL AND GAS LEASE RECORDED SEPTEMBER 29, 1970 UNDER RECEPTION NO, 1555404 AND ANY AND ALL ASSIGNMENTS THEREOF, OR INTEREST THEREIN. DECLARATION OF POOLING RECORDED MAY 30, 2014 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 4019827 AND 4019829 14. RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT AS GRANTED TO PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPE LINE COMPANY IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED FEBRUARY 19, 1974, UNDER RECEPTION NO, 1630459. 15. RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT AS GRANTED TO THE MOUNTAIN STATES TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED JUNE 09, 1980, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 1826880. 16. RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT AS GRANTED TO NORTHERN COLORADO WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 21, 1995, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 2456523. 17, TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF EASEMENT RIGHT-OF-WAY AND SURFACE USE AGREEMENT RECORDED NOVEMBER 04, 1999 AT RECEPTION NO. 2730990, 18, EASEMENTS, CONDITIONS, COVENANTS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS AND NOTES ON THE PLAT OF 120724 -1 -RE -2478 RECORDED NOVEMBER 18, 1999 UNDER RECEPTION NO, 2733405, 19. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF NOTICE OF OIL AND GAS INTEREST AND SURFACE USE RECORDED DECEMBER 12, 2000 AT RECEPTION NO. 2812800. 20. REQUEST FOR NOTIFICATION OF SURFACE DEVELOPMENT AS EVIDENCED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED OCTOBER 15, 2001 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 2B91983. 21, RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT AS GRANTED TO KERR-MCGEE GATHERING, LLC IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED NOVEMBER 27, 2002, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 3009886. 22. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF SURFACE USE AGREEMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 27, 2006 AT RECEPTION NO, 3422709 AND AMENDMENT RECORDED JANUARY 21, 2014 AT RECEPTION NO, 3991196. 23. RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT AS GRANTED TO KINDER MORGAN INC. IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED DECEMBER 11, 2006, UNDER RECEPTION NO, 3440909. 24. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF AGREEMENT REGARDING EASEMENTS RECORDED JANUARY 04, 2011 AT RECEPTION NO. 3742916. 25. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF NOTICE OF PIPELINE LOCATION RECORDED NOVEMBER 17, 2011 AT RECEPTION NO, 3806210. 26, CONVEYANCE OF MINERALS AND MINERAL RIGHTS AS CONTAINED IN DEED RECORDED SEPTEMBER 2, 2014 AT RECEPTION NO, 4042770 AND ANY AND ALL INTERESTS THEREIN OR RIGHTS THEREUNDER. 27. RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT AS GRANTED TO KERR-MCGEE GATHERING, LLC IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED OCTOBER 26 20157 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 4153024; Ltt:btank 6/27/21 Page 9 of Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule B, Part II (Exceptions) Order Number: FCC25154556-7 28. (ITEM INTENTIONALLY DELETED) 29. (ITEM INTENTIONALLY DELETED) 30. RESERVATION OF MINERALS AND MINERAL RIGHTS AS CONTAINED IN DEED RECORDED SEPTEMBER 21, 2016 AT RECEPTION NO. 4238415 AND ANY AND ALL INTERESTS THEREIN OR RIGHTS THEREUNDER. 31. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF SHARED ACCESS AND ACCESS ROAD EASEMENT AGREEMENT RECORDED MAY 23, 2017 AT RECEPTION NO. 4304436. 32. EASEMENTS, CONDITIONS, COVENANTS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS AND NOTES ON THE PLAT OF RECORDED EXEMPTION NO. 1207-24-01 RECX17-0048 RECORDED AUGUST 09, 2017 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 4325830. 33. (ITEM INTENTIONALLY DELETED) EXCEPTIONS 9 THROUGH 33 AFFECT PARCEL A 34, OIL AND GAS LEASE RECORDED OCTOBER 04, 1972 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 15981.4 AND ANY AND ALL ASSIGNMENTS THEREOF, OR INTEREST THEREIN. DECLARATION OF POOLING RECORDED MAY 30, 2014 UNDER RECEPTION NO, 40J$827 AND 4019828. 35. RIGHT OP WAY EASEMENT AS GRANTED TO THE MOUNTAIN STATES TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED MAY 02, 1980, UNDER RECEPTION NO 1823960. 36. RESERVATION OF MINERALS AND MINERAL RIGHTS AS CONTAINED IN DEED RECORDED JUNE 23, 1981 AT RECEPTION NO. 1861342 AND ANY AND ALL INTERESTS THEREIN OR RIGHTS THEREUNDER. 37, RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT AS GRANTED TO NORTHERN COLORADO WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED JUNE 19, 1995, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 2442 40. 38, TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF NOTICE OF OIL AND GAS INTEREST AND SURFACE USE RECORDED DECEMBER 12, 2000 AT RECEPTION NO. 2812804. 39. REQUEST FOR NOTIFICATION OF SURFACE DEVELOPMENT AS EVIDENCED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED OCTOBER 15, 2001 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 2891939, 40, EASEMENTS, CONDITIONS, COVENANTS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS AND NOTES ON THE PLAT OF RECORDED EXEMPTION NO. 1207-24-04 RE -4216 RECORDED OCTOBER 20, 2005 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 3333210. 41. RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT AS GRANTED TO KINDER MORGAN IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED DECEMBER 11, 2006, UNDER RECEPTION NO, 3440918. 42. (ITEM INTENTIONALLY DELETED) )ut.blank 6 27/'( Page 10 of Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule B, Part II (Exceptions) Order Number: FCC25154556-1 43. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT AGREEMENT RECORDED JANUARY 04, 2011 AT RECEPTION NO. 3742915. 44, RESERVATION OF MINERALS AND MINERAL RIGHTS AS CONTAINED IN DEED RECORDED OCTOBER 22, 2015 AT RECEPTION NO. 4152317 AND ANY AND ALL INTERESTS THEREIN OR RIGHTS THEREUNDER. 45. EASEMENTS, CONDITIONS, COVENANTS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS AND NOTES ON THE PLAT OF RECORDED EXEMPTION NO. 1207-24-04 RECX17-0097 RECORDED OCTOBER 19, 2017 UNDER RECEPTION NO, 43455_67. EXCEPTIONS 33 THROUGH 45 AFFECT PARCEL B 46. REQUEST FOR NOTIFICATION OF SURFACE DEVELOPMENT AS EVIDENCED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED DECEMBER 71 2007 I NDER RECEPTION! NO, fl fl' I RECORDED 1. +_+ ■ ti r..� � L# i � � L... SJ tJ I v I � � .r � r S I t � s L. I i t_+ i # ■ l i t . aJ+ +.A � S� L � + 47. ANY TAX, LIEN, FEE, OR ASSESSMENT BY REASON OF INCLUSION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY IN THE NORTHERN COLORADO WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT, AS EVIDENCED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 29, 2010, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 3721790. 48. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF THIRTY FOOT ACCESS EASEMENT RECORDED OCTOBER 13, 2017 AT RECEPTION NO. 4343941. EXCEPTIONS 8 AND 46 THROUGH 48 AND THE NOTE BELOW AFFECT PARCELS A AND B NOTE: THE FOLLOWING NOTICES PURSUANT TO CRS 9-1.5-103 CONCERNING UNDERGROUND FACILITIES HAVE BEEN FILED WITH THE CLERK AND RECORDER. THESE STATEMENTS ARE GENERAL AND DO NOT NECESSARILY GIVE NOTICE OF UNDERGROUND FACILITIES WITHIN THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: (A) MOUNTAIN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, RECORDED OCTOBER 1, 1981 AT RECEPTION NO. 1870705, (B) WESTERN SLOPE GAS COMPANY, RECORDED MARCH 9, 1983 AT RECEPTION NO, 1919757. (C) ASSOCIATED NATURAL GAS, INC., RECORDED JULY 20, 1984 AT RECEPTION NO. 1974810 AND RECORDED OCTOBER 1, 1984 AT RECEPTION NO. 1983584 AND RECORDED MARCH 3, 1988 AT RECEPTION NO, 2132709 AND RECORDED APRIL 10, 1989 AT RECEPTION NO, 2175917. (D) PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPE LINE COMPANY, RECORDED OCTOBER 1, 1981 AT RECEPTION NO. 1870756 AND RECORDED JUNE 26, 1986 AT RECEPTION NO, 2053722 (E) COLORADO INTERSTATE GAS COMPANY, RECORDED AUGUST 31, 1984 AT RECEPTION NO, 1979784. (F) UNION RURAL ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC,, RECORDED OCTOBER 5, 1981 AT RECEPTION NO 1811+_04, (G) WESTERN GAS SUPPLY COMPANY, RECORDED APRIL 2, 1985 AT RECEPTION NO 2004300. (H) PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO, RECORDED NOVEMBER 9, 1981 AT RECEPTION NO 1374034, (1) ST. VRAIN SANITATION DISTRICT, RECORDED DECEMBER 14, 1988 AT RECEPTION NO. 2164975, (3) LEFT HAND WATER DISTRICT, RECORDED AUGUST 28, 1990 AT RECEPTION NO. 2224917, (K) UNITED POWER INC., RECORDED JANUARY 24, 1901 AT RECEPTION NO, 2239296. (L) WICC!NS TELEPHONE ASSOCIATION RECORDED OCTOBER 14, 1992 AT RECEPTION NO. 2306829.. 49, THE EFFECT OF ORDINANCE NO. 812 RECORDED SEPTEMBER 6, 2017 AT RECEPTION NO list:blank /27�/2( Page I i of Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule B5 Part II (Exceptions) Order Number: FCC25154556-7 7 4333082 AND MAP RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO. 4333083. (AFFECTS PARCEL B) 50, TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF ORDINANCE NO, 813 RECORDED SEPTEMBER 06, 2017 AT RECEPTION NO% 4333084 AND MAP RECORDED SEPTEMBER 6, 2017 AT RECEPTION NO. 43330851 (AFFECTS PARCEL B) 51. ANY FACTS, RIGHTS, INTERESTS OR CLAIMS WHICH MAY EXIST OR ARISE BY REASON OF THE FOLLOWING FACTS SHOWN ON ALTIVACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY LAST REVISED FEBRUARY 22, 2018 PREPARED BY CHL ENGINEERING & SURVEYING, JOB #174095: A. ACCESS ROAD, AGRICULTURAL DITCH, WATER VALVE ENCLOSURE AREA B. OlUGAS FACILITIES C, UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WERE NOT LOCATED D. FENCES DO NOT COINCIDE WITH THE PROPERTY LINES (SAID DOCUMENT STORED AS OUR ESI 35341002) (AFFECTS PARCELS AAND B) 51 a ANY AND ALL RIGHTS OF THE HOWLETT DITCH COMPANY OR DITCH OPERATOR RELATING TO HOWLETT DITCH, WHICH TRAVERSES SUBJECT PROPERTY OR IS DESCRIBED AS A BOUNDARY OF SUBJECT PROPERTY, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO DITCH MAINTENANCE AND ACCESS RIGHTS TO LANDS ADJOINING THE DITCH, AS DISCLOSED BY ALTANSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY LAST REVISED FEBRUARY 221 2018 BY CHL ENGINEERING & SURVEYING, JOB #174095. (AFFECTS PARCELS A AND B) 53. (ITEM INTENTIONALLY DELETED) H .t:bkrnk 6/27/2( Page 12 of Land Title ILI Air 3.i r r 4 Orl i Is. •••••=i• JOINT NOTICE OF PRIVACY POLICY OF LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY OF SUMMIT COUNTY LAND TITLE INSURANCE CORPORATION AND OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY This Statement is provided to you as a customer of Land Title Guarantee Company and Meridian Land Title, LLC4 as agents for Land Title Insurance Corporation and Old Republic National Title Insurance Company. We want you to know that we recognize and respect your privacy expectations and the requirements of federal and state privacy laws information security is one of our highest priorities, We recognize that maintaining your trust and confidence is the bedrock of our business. We maintain and regularly review internal and external safeguards against unauthorized access to non-public personal information ("Personal Information"). In the course of our business, we maycollect Personal Information about you from: �► applications or other forms we receive from you, including communications sent through IMX, our web -based transaction management system; your transactions with, or from the services being performed by, us, our affiliates, or others; a consumer reporting agency, if such information is provided to us in connection with your transaction; and Ib► the public records maintained by governmental entities that we either obtain directly from those entities, or from our affiliates and non -affiliates. op Our policies regarding the protection of the confidentiality and security of your Personal Information are as follows: We restrict access to all Personal Information about you to those employees who need to know that information in order to provide products and services to you, 10, We maintain physical, electronic and procedural safeguards that comply with federal standards to protect your Personal Information from unauthorized access or intrusion. Employees who violate our strict policies and procedures regarding privacy are subject to disciplinary action. We regularly access security standards and procedures to protect against unauthorized access to Personal Information. WE DO NOT DISCLOSE ANY PERSONAL INFORMATION ABOUT YOU WITH ANYONE FOR ANY PURPOSE THAT IS NOT PERMITTED BY LAW. Consistent with applicable privacy laws, there are some situations in which Personal Information may be disclosed. We may disclose your Personal Information when you direct or give us permission; when we are required by law to do so, for example, if we are served a subpoena; or when we suspect fraudulent or criminal activities. We also may disclose your Personal Information when otherwise permitted by applicable privacy laws such as, for example, when disclosure is needed to enforce our rights arising out of any agreement, transaction or relationship with you . Our policy regarding dispute resolution is as follows. Any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to our privacy poli+cyr of the breach thereof, shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration Association, and judgment upon the award rendered by the arbitrator(s) may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. mt:blank 6/27/2( Page 13 of PP" Land Tltl� CUr4aA MtPE COM POO LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-11-122, notice is hereby given that: A) The Subject real property may be located in a special taxing district. B) A certificate of taxes due listing each taxing jurisdiction will be obtained from the county treasurer of the county in which the real property is located or that county treasurer's authorized agent unless the proposed insured provides written instructions to the contrary. (for an Owner's Policy of Title Insurance pertaining to a sale of residential real property) C) The information regarding special districts and the boundaries of such districts may be obtained from the Board of County Commissioners, the County Clerk and Recorder, or the County Assessor. Note: Effective September 1, 1997, CRS 30-10-406 requires that ail documents received for recording or filing in the clerk and recorder's office shall contain a top margin of at least one inch and a left, right and bottom margin of at least one half of an inch. The clerk and recorder may refuse to record or file any document that does not conform, except that, the requirement for the top margin shall not apply to documents using forms on which space is provided for recording or filing information at the top margin of the document. Note: Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 84-2 requires that "Every title entity shall be responsible for all matters which appear of record prior to the time of recording whenever the title entity conducts the closing and is responsible for recording or filing of legal documents resulting from the transaction which was closed`". Provided that Land Title Guarantee Company conducts the closing of the insured transaction and is responsible le for recording the legal documents from the transaction, exception number 5 will not appear on the Owner's Title Policy and the Lenders Policy when issued, Note; Affirmative mechanic's lien protection for the Owner may be available (typically by deletion of Exception no. 4 of Schedule 6-2 of the Commitment from the Owner's Policy to be issued) upon compliance with the following conditions: A) The land described in Schedule A of this commitment must be a single family residence which includes a condominium or townhouse unit, B) No labor or materials have been furnished by mechanics or material -men for purposes of construction on the land described in Schedule A of this Commitment within the past 6 months_ C) The Company must receive an appropriate affidavit indemnifying the Company against un-filed mechanic's and material -men's liens. D) The Company must receive payment of the appropriate premium, E) If there has been construction, improvements or major repairs undertaken on the property to be purchased within six months prior to the Date of the Commitment, the requirements to obtain coverage for unrecorded liens will include: disclosure of certain construction information; financial information as to the seller, the builder and or the contractor; payment of the appropriate premium fully executed Indemnity Agreements satisfactory to the company, and, any additional requirements as may be necessary after an examination of the aforesaid information by the Company. No coverage will be given under any circumstances for labor or material for which the insured has contracted for or agreed to pay. Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-11-123, notice is hereby given: f This notice applies to owner's policy commitments disclosing that a mineral estate has been severed from the surface estate, in Schedule B-21 A) That there is recorded evidence that a mineral estate has been severed, leased, or otherwise conveyed from the surface estate and that there is a substantial i ike li hood that a third party holds some or all interest in oil, gas, other minerals, or geothermal energy in the property; and B) That such mineral estate may include the right to enter and use the property without the surface owner's permission. Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-1-128(6)(a), It is unlawful to knowingly provide false, incomplete, or misleading facts or information to an insurance company for the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the company Penalties may include imprisonment, fines, denial of insurance, and civil damages. Any insurance company or agent of an insurance company who knowingly provides false, incomplete, or misleading facts or information to a policyholder or claimant for the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the policyholder or claimant with regard to a, settlement or award payable from insurance proceeds shall be reported to the Colorado Division of Insurance within the Department of Regulatory Agencies. Note: Pursuant to Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 8-1-3, notice is hereby given of the availability of a closing protection letter for the lender, purchaser, lessee or seller in connection with this transaction. )ut:blank /27/2 Page 14 of * sor, Commitment For Title Insurance isi * asic % * Issued by OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY NOTICE lif * it* IMPORTANT —READ CAREFULLY: THIS COMMITMENT IS AN OFFER TO ISSUE ONE OR MORE TITLE INSURANCE POLICIES. ALL CLAIMS OR REMEDIES SOUGHT AGAINST THE COMPANY INVOLVING THE CONTENT OF THIS COMMITMENT OR THE POLICY MUST BE BASED SOLELY IN CONTRACT THIS COMMITMENT IS NOT AN ABSTRACT OF TITLE, REPORT OF THE CONDITION OF TITLE, LEGAL OPINION, OPINION OF TITLE, OR OTHER REPRESENTATION OF THE STATUS OF TITLE. THE PROCEDURES USED BY THE COMPANY TO DETERMINE INSURABILITY OF THE TITLE, INCLUDING ANY SEARCH AND EXAMINATION, ARE PROPRIETARY TO THE COMPANY, WERE PERFORMED SOLELY FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE COMPANY, AND CREATE NO EXTRACONTRACTUAL LJABILiTY TO ANY PERSON, INCLUDING A PROPOSLO INSURED.. THE COMPANY'S OBLIGATION UNDER THIS COMMITMENT IS TO ISSUE A POLICY TO A PROPOSED INSURED IDENTIFIED IN SCHEDULE A IN ACCORDANCF WITH THE TFRMS AND PROVISIONS OF THIS COMMITMENT. THE COMPANY HAS NO LIABILITY OR OBLIGATION INVOLVING THE CONTENT OF THIS COMMITMENT TO ANY OTHER PERSON. COMM iTM ENT TO ISSUE POLICY Subject to the Notice; Schedule B, Part I —Requirements; Schedule B, Part II ----Exceptions; and the Commitment Conditions, Old republic National Title Insurance Company, A Minnesota corporation (the "Company"), commits to issue the Policy according to the terms and provisions of this Commitment. This Commitment is effective as of the Commitment Date shown in Schedule Afor each Policy described in Schedule A, only when the Company has entered in Schedule A both the specified dollar amount as the Proposed Policy Amount and the name of the Proposed Insured. if all of the Schedule B, Part I —Requirements have not been met within 6 months after the Commitment Date, this Commitment terminates and the Company's liability and obligation end. COMMITMENT CONDITIONS 1. DEFINITIONS (a) "Knowledge" or "Known": Actual or imputed knowledge, but not constructive notice imparted by the Public Records. (b) "Land": The land described in Schedule A and affixed improvements that by law constitute real property. The term "Land" does not include any property beyond the lines of the area described in Schedule A, nor any right, title, interest, estate, or easement in abutting streets, roads, avenues,aileys, lanes, ways, or waterways, but this does not modify or limit the extent that a right of access to and from the Land is to be insured by the Policy. (c) "Mortgage": A mortgage, deed of trust, or other security instrument, including one evidenced by electronic means authorized by law. II (d) "Policy": Each contract of title insurance, in a form adopted by the American Land Title Association, issued or to be issued by the Company pursuant to this Commitment. (e) "Proposed Insured": Each person identified in Schedule A as the Proposed Insured of each Policy to be issued pursuant to this Commitment. (f) "Proposed Policy Amount": Each dollar amount specified in Schedule A as the Proposed Policy Amount of each Policy to be issued pursuant to this Commitment. (g) "Public Records": Records established under state statutes at the Commitment Date for the purpose of imparting constructive notice of matters relating to real property to purchasers for value and without Knowledge (h) "Title": The estate or interest described in Schedule A. 2. If all of the Schedule B, Part I Requirements have not been met within the time period specified in the Commitment to Issue Policy, Comitment terminates and the Company's liability and obligation end. 3. The Company's liability and obligation (a) the Notice; is limited by and this Commitment is not valid without: (b) the Commitment to Issue Policy, (c) the Commitment Conditions; (d) Schedule A; (e) Schedule B, Part I —Requirements; [andj (f) Schedule B, Part II --Exceptions[; and (g) a counter -signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form. )ut:blank 6/27/2( Page 15 of 4. COMPANY'S RIGHT TO AMEND The Company may amend this Commitment at any time If the Company amends this Commitment to add a defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim, or other matter recorded ira the Public Records prior to the Commitment Date, any liability of the Company is limited by Commitment Condition 5, The Company shall not be liable for any other amendment to this Commitment, S. LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY (a) the Company's liability under Commitment Condition 4 is limited to the Proposed insured's actual expense incurred in the interval between the Company's delivery to the Proposed Insured of the Commitment and the delivery of the amended Commitment, resulting from the Proposed Insured's good faith reliance to: (I) comply with the Schedule 6, Part I —Requirements; (ii) eliminate, with the Company's written consent, any Schedule B, Part II —Exceptions; or (iii) acquire the Title or create the Mortgage covered by this Commitment (b) The Company shall not be liable under Commitment Condition 5(a) if the Proposed Insured requested the amendment or had Knowledge of the matter and did not notify the Company about it i n writing (c) The Company will only have liability under Commitment Condition 4 if the Proposed Insured would not have incurred the expense had the Commitment included the added matter when the Commitment was first delivered to the Proposed Insured (id) The Company's liability shall not exceed the lesser of the Proposed Insured's actual expense incurred in good faith and described in Commitment Conditions 5(a)(i) through S(a)(iii) or the Proposed Policy Amount (e) The Company shall not be liable for the content of the Transaction identification Data, if any. (f) In no event shall the Company be obligated to issue the Policy referred to in this Commitment unless all of the Schedule B, Part I -Requirements have been met to the satisfaction of the Company. (g) In any event, the Company's liability is limited by the terms and provisions of the Policy. 6. LIABILITY OF THE COMPANY MUST BE BASED ON THIS COMMITMENT (a) Only a Proposed insured identified in Schedule Al and no other person, may make a claim under this Commitment (b) Any claim must be based in contract and must be restricted solely to the terms and provisions of this Commitment (c) Until the Policy is issued, this Commitment, as last revised, is the exclusive and entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter of this Commitment and supersedes alt prior commitment negotiations, representations, and proposals of any kind, whether mitten or oral, express or implied, relating to the subject matter of this Commitment (d) The deletion or modification of any Schedule B, Part II —Exception does not constitute an agreement or obligation to provide coverage beyond the terms and provisions of this Commitment or the Policy. (e) Any amendment or endorsement to this Commitment must be in writing (and authenticated by a person authorized by the Company] (0 When the Policy is issued, all liability and obligation under this Commitment will end and the Company's only liability will be under the Policy. 7r. iF THIS COMMITMENT HAS BEEN ISSUED BY AN ISSUING AGENT Tigre issuing agent is the Company's agent only. for the limited purpose of issuing title insurance commitments and policies The issuing agent is not the Company's agent for the purpose of providing closing or settlement services.. B. PRO -FORMA POLICY The Company may provide, at the request of a Proposed Insured, a pro -forma policy illustrating the coverage that the Company may provide. A pro -forma policy neither reflects the status of Title at the time that the pro -forma policy is delivered to a Proposed Insured, nor is it a commitment to insure ARBI RATION The Policy contains an arbitration clause. All arbitrable matters when the Proposed Policy Amount is $2,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Proposed insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties . A Proposed Insured may review a copy of the arbitration rules at h II itifiry w ii arwaruiuxattoo Issued by: Land Title Guarantee Company 3033 East First Avenue Suite 600 Denvefq, Colorado 80206 303-321-1880 /I L-004 Authorized Officer or Agent I ID I P 1 1si 1 %% rat Aft,gr 3 e. di elerl, St or y to 1,,ui •''Ce it ep art 1 • w. O * I I I Old Republic National Title Insurance Company a Stock Company 400 Second Avenue South Minneaolis, Minnesota 55401 (612)371.11m1 'ries�i�r�r� �- Y Mark Bilbrery President Ramie Yeager Secretary AMERICAN LAND I I lit 4SSf( ir� i iti34 This page is only a part eta 2016 ALTO Commitment for Title Insurance Old Republic National True rristuance Company. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to issue Polity; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule k Schedule e, Part I —R+ irsments; and Schedule B, Pan #U--trcepticns(; and a counter -signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may S in electronic form) Copyright 2096-2015 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved, The Ilse of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and AEJA nientt er5 in good standing as of the date of use AJI other uses are prohibited Reprinted under Ircense front the Ainet scan Land Title Association mt:blank 6/27/2( Page Rocky Ridge Civil engineering Preliminary Drainage .erosion Control Report Red Barn Subdivision Town of Mead Weld County, CO Prepared for: 13-32 Development LLC Longmont, CO 303-641-5058 Prepared by: ROCKY RIDGE CIVIL ENGINEERING, LLC 420 21st Avenue, Suite 101 Longmont, CO 80501 303.651.6626 March, 2018 RRCE Job# 723-1 1 litttblank 6/27/20 Page 2 of "I hereby certify that this report (plan) for the preliminary drainage design of Red Barn Subdivision, was prepared by me (or under my direct supervision) in accordance withh the provisions of Town of Mead Storm Drainage Criteria Manual for the owners thereof." Registered Professional Engineer State of Colorado No. 41755 nit:blank 6/27/2( Page 3 of Table of Contents I. General Location and Description H f Historical Drainage & Proposed Drainage III. Drainage Design Criteria IV, Drainage Facilities Design V, Erosion & Sediment Control Measures VI. Stormwater Quality VII, Conclusion Appendices Figures Hydrologic Calculations Hydraulic Calculations Detention Pond Calculations Map Pocket Drainage Plans (Sheet DP -41 thru DP -03) Erosion Control Plan. & Details (sheet 8 & 10) )ut:blank 6/27/21 Page 4 of I 1, General Locatioti & Description Location This proposed residential subdivision is located at the northwest & northeast quarters of section 24, Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6th Principal Meridian. It is basically located on the South East corner intersection of Weld County Roads 13 & 32 The site will be platted at 196 acres (more or less) of residential construction (zone RSF 4 and RSF 1). This site is proposed development of this site is single family homeswith interior parldopen space and trails meandering within this development. See Figure 1 for a vicinity map for the project and the Preliminary veral l Drainage Map (sheet D Pvg0 1) for clarity. Topography and Property. Description The historic drainage within the proposed development is mild sloping and sheet-4lows across the property with an average slope being .5% up to 5% from southwest to northeast for the entire area, The soils in this area are largely a silty loam type, In the mapping shown in the Appendix (Figure 2 a, b, c, d, e, f), the Hydrologic Soils Group was classified as Type ` B C, therefore, for ease of calculations, e used Type 'C' to be more conservative. The property will be developed into seven (7) Phases. A phasing map (Figure 3) is attached in the Appendix of this report. Phase A&B make up the custom home sites that are adjacent to WCR 13 WCR 32 and will have a gravel access road that will service these lots. The remaining portion is to be residential construction and open space. Phase 1 thru 7 are located in the interior portion of the property and will be a combination of single family home sites with paved streets, detached & attached sidewalks, gravel bike/pedestrian paths, landscape tracts and open space/parks. The concept map attached in the appendix proposes both basement & crawl space foundation type products 'Meadows & Homestead) respectively, ) ut:blank 6/27/2( Page 5 of II. I i t° ric & Proposed Drainage Major Basin Description This site, located in the Town of Mead, Weld County, is predominantly surrounded by light agricultural lands or large residential/custom home -sites on all sides. The project site lies in a FE A. designated area, Zone X;"area of minimal flood hazard". The site is located in the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), Community Panel No. 081 3 18 8OE with a revision date of 1120/2016. (See Figure 4) There are no streams through the site, but there is an irrigation ditch about 2/3 of the overall distance of this property running East/West. The ditch will remain, but it is proposed to be piped to preserve the quality of water that travels within it as it crosses this property. Since Basin A & Basin B contain a natural high point occurring at Homestead drive at the west -most property line (approximately at the mid -point). Both of these will historically flow in the existing road -side ditches toward the intersection of WCR 13 R 32 to an existing 24 -inch diameter culvert that currently crosses under WCR 32 and drains into the nearby Lake Thomas directly to the North. Offsite Basins [ Refer to Sheets IMP -01 thru DP -03 for all Basin Information] There are 2 major offsite basins (USA O B, and sub -basins contained within) that we will expect runoff from the West & South adjacent properties. This runoff is relatively minor due to the ditches that run along the property lines already, which will not be altered Alt offsite flows will be intercepted into the drainage ditches on the West South property lines. These flows will be routed & detained in these on -site water quality/detention ponds noted as Pond A B, respectively and will be historically unchanged as this property is developed. Onsite Basins Basin A: Basin A (Sub -basins At thru A20) is the North half of the developed property and will convey the overland flows to the proposed Pond A via means of a 6" standard concrete curb & gutter pan to proposed on -site type R inlets located at the following street intersections: • Harvest Moon Drive & Meadows Lane • Harvest Moon Drive & Red Barn Road • Harvest Moon Drive & Harvest Lane • Gala Street & Heritage Circle From these collection points, all Stormwater will flow toward the Pond A via underground storm piping & asphalt paved streets/concrete gutter flow. Grass sales will convey overland flows into nearby streets throughout the project. All piping that terminates into the ponds will have flared end sections constructed at the end of the piping and will have riprap at their inverts to dissipate the energy from those concentrated flows. )Lit: blank 6/27/2( Page 6 of I Sub -basins A,21 thrct A22 are 6 custom home lots in Phase A and will convey the overland flows to the proposed Pond C via means of overland grassy swales, a roadside ditch/culvert and grated Type Cinlets. The access driveway that runs along the South West property lines of those custom Lots will have a roadside ditch to collect uphill sheet surface flow and direct it towards the grated inlet at the intersection of Lots 4 & 5 of Block 1 (on the southwest side of the road). The other 7 lots/custom home sites (Lots 1 thru ` of Block 2) are located between Harvest Moon Road & Red Barn Road along WCR 13, These are to be developed separately from the major portion. of the single family homes that are to be developed within the subdivision. Since these custom lots are somewhat separated on the east side of the property; they will convey the historic flows to the read -side ditch, then be collected in Pond A from the inlet located at Harvest Moon Drive & WCR 13. Basin B: -Basin B (Sub -basins B1 thru 16) is the South half of the developed property and will convey the overland flows to the proposed Pond B via means of 6" standard concrete curb & matter pans to proposed on -site type R inlets located at the following street intersections: • Sunflower Drive nearest Heritage Drive • Red Barn Road nearest Sunflower Drive • Red Barn Road nearest WCR 13 R From these collection points, all Storm.water will flow toward the Pond B via underground storm piping & asphalt paved streets/concrete gutter flow. Grass swales will convey overland flows into nearby streets throughout the project. All piping that terminates into the ponds will have flared end sections constructed at the end of the piping and will have riprap at their inverts to dissipate the energy from those concentrated flows, )ut:blank 6/27/2( Page 7 of III. Drainage Design Criteria The Town of Mead drainage standards were used as the basis for developing the drainage plan. The Town of Mead's Storm Drainage Criteria are largely based on "Urban Storm. Drainage Criteria Manual" TSDC M1) & the rules and regulations under those provisions. The hydrological criteria used for this report was based on the U.1 D M dated June 2017. The Rational Method was used to determine the 10 -year & 100 -year peak runoff values. Rainfall Intensity was based upon the Time Intensity Frequency Curve data taken from the NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 8, Version 2 for City of Longmont 2 ESE, Colorado (see Figure . .1. thru A.4) for Rainfall. Runoff coefficient values were taken from Table 6-5 of the UDC , Flow calculation table are found in the Runoff Calculations Section of the Appendix. There is one plan in the map pocket showing the flow patterns of the site (Sheet GROI) which contains the detailed grading plan for the ponds and the entire site which is the major piece to this report. Per the Town of Mead drainage criteria and conversations with WA, Inc (The Town' s review Engineer), that in the 100 -year event for the developed condition, the maxim= allowable release rate is to match the historic 10 -year discharge rate. This criterial will apply to the Ponds noted below (calculations are included at the Appendix of this report). POND The hydraulic criteria software utilized for the swale size verification was Flowmaster Haested software). The pond was sized using the USDCM software entitled "Modified FAA Method" for sizing ponds. The allowable release rate used in the USDCM software for the 10 year event is 0.30 cfsiacrc and therefore leads to the Peak Outflow rate of 41, .70cfs in the 100 -year event (0.3 cfs/acre x 139 acres) . Volumes required were taken after 60 minutes. PO B: The hydraulic criteria software utilized for the swale size verification was Flowmaster Haested software). The pond was sized using the IJ D M software entitled "Modified FAA Method" for sizing ponds. The allowable release rate used in the USDCM software for the JO year event is 010 cfs/acre and therefore leads to the Peak Outflow rate o 23!44cf5 in the 100 -year event (03 cfs/acre 78,14 acres). Volumes required were taken after 60 minutes. POND C: The hydraulic criteria software utilized for the swale size verification. was Flowmaster Haested software). The pond was sized using the USDCM software entitled, "Modified FAA Method" for sizing ponds. The allowable release rate used in the USD M software for_ the 10 year event is 0.30 cfsiacre and therefore leads to the Peak Outflow rate of 5 35cfs in the 10O -year event (0.3 cf /acre x 1.7,83 acres). Volumes required were taken after 60 minutes. ntit:blank 6/27/2( Page 8 of IV. Drainwit Full Des ip n There are only two onsite basins to be modeled with this site, Basin A and Basin B. These basins largely consist of building roof runoff, asphalt drives, gravel trails/access roads, concrete cub/gutters and grassed landscaped areas to direct the drainage flows. Basin. A and B, make up the entire 196 -acre site to be developed into 7 phases of construction as noted in Part .11. The drainage from Basin A will flow east then to the north and be captured and directed within the 2' wide/6" high concrete curb and gutter that will flow into type R in.ets, then those flows will be carried via storm pipe to the Detention Pond A at the NE corner of the property (see Design Points 11, 16, & 23, and referred to as DP1.1, DP 16, & DP23 respectively herein). Calculations for the flow volume, swale hydraulics, pond volume, and the outlet orifices and pipes at DP 11, 16 23 will be included in the Appendix of the final drainage report (not in this preliminary report). i The drainage from Basin B will flow east & south and be captured and directed within the 2' wide/6" high concrete curb and gutter that will flow into type R inlets, then those flows will be carried via storm pipe to the detention. Pond A at the NE corner of the property (see Design Points 110, & 117 and referred to as DP'110 & DPI.17 respectively herein). Calculations for the flow volume, swale hydraulics, pond volume, and the outlet orifices and pipes at D P l 10 & DP117 will be included in the Appendix of the final drainage report (not in this preliminary report). Due to the constraints of the development, the ponds will have water 4uality outlet structures which will discharge into the existing ditch along WCR 32 WCR 13 which ties into newly proposed storm pipe/type R inlets to be installed with the road widening to occur at this intersection (which will be deterrui led in the Final Drainage Study by Rocky Ridge Civil Engineering) and Master drainage study currently being written by NA Associates. This detention pond system is designed to permit the allowable peak outflow as mentioned previously in this report. Details for detention pond can be located on Sheet DP -01 that DP -03 enclosed at the back of this report. )ut:blank 612712€ Page 9 of V. Erosion and Sediment Control Measures Silt Fencing will be installed along the do n hi ll side of each phase of development and will remain in place until construction and landscaping is completed or until 70% of the preexisting cover has been restored to the site. A vehicle tracking control pad will be installed at the three construction entrances along WCR 13 WCR 32 to control trading of soil onto the street system during construction. Vehicle Tracking Control will be retaired at the entrances on to WCR 13 & 32, and are shown on the attached erosion control plans for reference the appendix Map section). i Any stockpiling of material will be placed near the high side of each pond areab Once the earthwork subcontractor is selected, it will be determined if the topsoil will be stripped and where it will be stockpiled. Additional silt fencing will be required around the topsoil stockpiles if created. Inlet & outlet protection will be required at all inlet entrances & pipe discharge points, These areas and the types are noted on the Drainage & Erosion control maps & details enclosed. It is essential that all of the BM? areas are well inspected, cleaned, and maintained every four weeks or after every significant storm event to insure the erosion control measures are working effectively. As areas are brought to finished grade, the final preparation will be surface roughening and mulching in areas not receiving other landscape treatment. Other areas like concrete washout areas will be identified once the contractor has been selected. There are placeholders on the plans for those items currently. m iit:blank 6/27/2( Page 10 of I . Stormwater ualit The permanent BMWs for the site is designated as the Pond A, Pond B & Pond Cas shown in the Drainage Plans and will be conveyed thru Street Curb & Gutter, Storm Piping and Grassy Drainage swales within the site to the above mentioned detention ponds. Sizing for the ponds are found in the Pond Calculations section of the Appendix. Temporary Silt Fencing shalt be installed around the detention ponds and downhill sides to control runoff. Rock Socks around all inlets will be required until the project is completed in developed and 70% of the landscaping of the residences is complete. The storm water management permit will be acquired by the contractor once that company has been selected. nit: blank 6/27/2( A Page 11 of VIII Conclusion Drainage flows within the site will generally follow historic patterns and, drainage concepts. The storm water will be carried through the site via streets and storm sewer systems and the overall drainage concept is to convey these flows to permanent retention ponds then release back to the roadside ditches that will eventually flow into Lake Thomas to the North. There is currently a Master Drainage Study being conducted by Inc and may be implemented by the time the Final Drainage Report for this subdivision is written and will be addressed in the Final Drainage report if that becomes adopted at a future time. It is intended that the improvements within the Red Barn subdivision shall follow the approved Area Master Drainage Study, In conclusion, the 196 acre site of the Red Barn. Subdivision will be developed into R F- 1 and RSF-4 zoning. The major (100 -year) storm will be collected into the on -site facilities, Stortnwater quality measures (permanent BM ''s) have been proposed for the development to insure a cleaner runoff downstream. The results of this study indicate that the proposed development will conform to Town. of Mead's requirements. The drainage facilities designed for the site will safely convey runoff from the site with no adverse effects or impacts on the su roundinng developments. nit:blank 6/27/2( I Page 12 of M o I APPENDIX )ut:blank 6/27/9( Page 13 of Figures a )tit: blank 6/27/2( VICINITY MAP N.T.S. N.) fess 40" 13 Y6" N 440° 121 26. N f tagin eztxp Einar. N A F TTY .�.e..—.—a sYmai. .s L Miardgl 6041.14:4, Map S kt:1:10 4Q f printed on A 6 (11' 3t 8S) site& Soil Map —Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part (723-1 Red Barn Subdivision Soil Map) r Meters o 1 iL MO &X) 900 Map p*v : ■ eb McLato i t 176..184 USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Sail Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey Cit 5S 56'11 3/1212018 Page 1 of 3 40"131b'N sr sa. c 409 1726• N CD Can ►-t) Soil Map —Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part (723-1 Red Barn Subdivision Soil Map) MAP LEGEND Area of -Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOl) Soils a Soil Map Unit Polygons Soil Map Unit tines Sol Map Unit Points Special Point Features 0 a 44 0 a 0 0 V • a 4> 3, Blowout Borrow Pit Clay Spot Closed Depression Gravel Pit Gravelly Spot Landfill Lava Flow Marsh or swamp Mine or Quaff miscellaneous Water Perennial Water Rock Outcrop Saline Spot Sandy Spot Severely Eroded Spot Sinkhole Slide or Slip Sodic Spot 4 43 t a ,Or Spoil Area Stony Spot Very Stony Spot Wet Spot Cotter Special Line Features Water Features s_ Streams and Canals 0 Transportation Rails emir Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Aerial Photography MAP INFORMATION The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000. r Warning: Soil Map may not to valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Wets Soil Survey I„1RL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPS+3:3657) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape tut distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version cdate(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part Survey Area Data: Version 16, Oct 10, 2017 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Sep 20.2015 --Oct 15, 2016 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs froth the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident USDA Natural Resources rtt Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 3/12/20/8 Page 2 of 3 Ci\e" 7 atni (I °CI) 4 Soil Map --'Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part " h,,, -icat - Page 17 of 723-1 Red Barn Subdivision Soil Map Map Unit Legend : -- Map Unit -Symbol ; : =: - Map Unit Name Acres in AOl =.Perc+ant cif Ad _ = 15 Colby loam, 1 slopes to 3 percent 9.3 2.0% 32 1.1 Kim loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes 0,2% 34 1.8% Kim loam, 5 to 9 percent slopes 8,3 36 Nelson fine percent slopes sandy loam, 3 to J 33,9 7.2% 78 Weld ld loam, a to 1 percent slopes 140,5 29.9% 79 28,8% Weld slopes loam, 1 to 3 percent 134.6 82 Wiley -Colby complex, 1 to 3 percent slopes 138,8 29.1% r 83 Wiley -Colby percent slopes complex, 3 to 5 4,8 1,0% 8 Water 1.2 I .____ . - -- 0.2% .- Totals for Area of Interest 470.4 100,0% USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey Conservation Service Notional Cooperative Soil Survey 3112/2018 Page 3of3 nit:blank 6/27/2( Page 18 of Map Unit Description: Weld loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes ---Weld County, Colorado, Southern 723-1 Red Barn Subdivision Soil 78 Part Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part 78 Weld loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 2x0hy y Elevation: 3,503 to 5,750 feet Mean annual precipitation: 12 to 17 inches Mean annual air temperature: 46 to 54 degrees F Frost -free period: 115 to 155 days Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated Map Unit Composition Weld and similar soils: 80 percent Minor components: 20 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Weld Setting Landform: kmerfiuves Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit Landform position (three-dimensional): I nterfiuve Down -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Parent material; Calcareous loess Typical profile Ap - 0 to 8 inches: loam Bt1 - 8 to 12 inches: clay B12 - 12 to 15 inches: okay loa rn Btk - 15 to 28 inches: loam Bk 4 28 to 60 inches: silt loam C - 60 to 80 inches: silt loam. Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 1 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Runoff class: Low Capacity of the most limiting sayer to transmit water (sat): Moderately low to moderately high (0, 06 to 0,20 inihr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 14 percent Salinity, maximum in profile: N onsa line to very slightly saline (0.1 to 2.0 mmhoslcrn) Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum in profile; 5.0 Available water storage in profile: High. (about 11.3 Inches) USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey was Conservation SerMce National Cooperative Soil Survey 3/12/2018 Page 1 of 3 nit:blank k 6/27/2( Page 19 of Map Unit Description: Weid loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes —Weld Count+, Colorado, Southern 723-1 Red Bar. Subdivision Soil 78 Part 7 Z1 Coya;rdideck‘ Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 2c Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3c Hydrologic Soil Group: C ir Ecological site: Loamy Plains (R067BY00200) Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Colby Percent of map unit: 8 percent Landform; Hillslopes Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope Landform positron (three-dimensional): Side slope Down -slope shape: Convex Across-srope shape; Convex Ecological site: Loamy Plains (8.0678 00200) Hydric soil rating: No Wiley Percent of map unit: 7 percent Landform: Interfl uves Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope Down -slope shape: Convex Across -slope shape: Convex Ecological site: Loamy Plains (R067B 00200) Hydric soil rating: No Keith Percent of map unit: 3 percent Landform: I nterfluves Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit Landform position (three-dimensional) : I n terflu ve Down -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Ecological site: Loamy Plains (R0676Y002CO) Hydric soil rating: No Baca Percent of nap unit: 2 percent Landform: Interfiuves Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder Landform position (throe -dimensional): I nterfluve Down -slope shape: Linear, convex Across -slope shape: Linear, convex Ecological site: Loamy Plains (R067BY002CO) Natural Resources Web Soil Survey Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey 3/12/2018 Page 2 of 3 n it:blank 6/27/2( Page 20 of Map Unit Description: Weld loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes —Weld County, Colorado, Southern 723-1 Red Barn Subdivision Soil 79 Part # Ttch- Can I4A 4 Hydric soil rating: No Data Source Information Soil Survey Area: Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part Survey Area Data: Version 16, Oct 10, 2017 II I USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey alii Conservation Service 'National Coopwative Soil Survey 3/12/201$ Page 3 of mt:blank 6/27/2( r or . Page 21 of Map Unit Description: Weld loam, I to 3 percent slopes-- elCi County, cJlCaC35+L1 Southern 723-1 Red Barn Subdivision Soil 79 Part Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part 79 Weld loam, I to 3 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 2x0hw Elevation: 3,600 to 8,750 feet Mean annual precipitation: 12 to 17 inches Mean annual air temperature: 46 to 54 degrees F Frost -free period: 115 to 155 days Farmland classification: Prime farmland if Irrigated Map Unit Composition Weld and similar soils: 80 percent Minor components: 20 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit, Description of Weld Setting Landform: I n terfluves Landform position (two-dimensional); Summit Landform position (three-dimensional): interfiuve Dorn -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Parent material: Calcareous loess Typical profile Ap - 0 to 8 inches; loam all - 8 to 12 inches; clay 5t2 - 12 to 15 inches: clay loam Btk - 15 to 26 inches: loam Bk - 28 to 60 inches: silt loam C - 60 to 80 inches: silt loam Properties and qualities Tape: 1 to 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Runoff class: Medium Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 inlhr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of panding; None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 14 percent Salinity maximum in profile: Nonsallne to very slightly saline (0.1 to 2.0 mrnhoslcrn) Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum in profile: 5.0 Available water storage in profile: High (about 11.3 inches) LikSa Natural Resources Web Soil Survey Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Sur=vey 3/12/2018 Page 1 of 3 )L1t:blank 6/2 7/2 ?age 22 of Map Unit Description: Weld loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes —Weld eid County, Colorado, Southern 723-1 Red Barn Subdivision Soil 79 Part /gam &COPE 4tert tete 011• Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 2e Land capability classification (nonirrrigated): 30 �-- Hydrologic Soil Group: Ecological site Loamy Plains (R06 7 BOC2 0) Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Adena Percent of map unit: 8 percent Landform: I nter-f l u ves La m/form position (two-dimensional): Shoulder Landform position (three-dimensipnal): kiterfluye Down -slope shape: Convex Across -slow shape: Convex Ecological site: Loamy Plains (80676 00200) l-tydric soil rating: No Colby Percent of map unit: 7 percent Landform: Hillslopes Landforr n position (two-dimensional): Backsiope Landfon-n position (three-dimensional): Side slope Down -slope shape: Convex Across -slope shape: Convex Ecological site; Loamy Plains (R0678Y002C0) .Hydric soil rating: No Keith Percent of map unit: 3 percent L anciform: i me rfluves Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit Landform position (three-dimensional) : 1 nter-fiuve Down -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Ecological site: Loamy Plains (R067BY002CO) Hyf rric soil rating: No Baca Percent of map unit: 2 percent Landform: 1ntetfluves Landform position (two -dimension&): Shoulder, summit Landform position (three-dimensional): inter#luve Down -slope shape: Linear, convex Across -slope shape: Linear, convex Ecological site: Loamy Plains (R0678Y00 0) USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 3/12/2018 Page 2 of 3 nit:blank 6/27/2( Page 23 of Map Unit Description: Weld iow,1 to 3 percent slopes. —Weld County, Colorado, Southern t23-1 Red Barn Subdivision Soil 79 Part u:4 79 a &Pi Hydric soil rating: No Data Source Information Soil Survey Area: Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part Survey Area Data: Version 16, Oct 10, 2017 1 1 , i LiS DA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey 3/12/2018 Page 3 of 3 )ut:blank 6/27/2( Page 24 of rt&URL Map Unit Description:Wiley-Colby complex, I to 3 percent slaps--- old County, Ccicradc, Southern Part -a- Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part 82 Wiley -Colby complex, I to 3 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 3643 Elevation: 4,850 to 5,000 feet Mean annual precipitation: 12 to 16 inches Mean annual air temperature: 48 to 54 degrees F Frost -free period: 135 to 170 days Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated 723-1 Red Eiarn Subdivision Soil 82 Map Unit Composition Wiley and similar soils: 60 percent Colby and similar soils: 30 percent Minor components: 10 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of thin maiming_ _ Description of Wiley Setting Landform: Plains Down -slow shape: Linear Aaross-s/ope shape: Linear Parent material; . Calcareous eoiiatl deposits Typical profile HI - U to 11 inches: silt loam H2 - 11 to 60 inches; silty clay loam F1,3 - 60 to 64 inches: silty clay loam Properties and qualities Slope: 1 to 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Runoff class: Low Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.60 to 2.00 i nlhr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of posting: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 15 percent Salinity maximum in profile: N onsal i no to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhosf cm) Available water storage in profile: High (about 11.7 inches) interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 2e Land capability classification (nor�rrigated): 4e Hydro/ogic Sod Group: B Ecological site- Loamy Plains (RO67B 00200) USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey +'S Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey 3/12/2018 Pagel oft n it:blank Page 25 of Map Unit Description: Wiley -Colby complex, 1 to 3 percent slopes — Southern PartWeld County, Colorado, 44:4 al#20 Capri '4 Hydric soil rating: No Description of Colby Setting Land/arm: Plains Down -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Parent material: Calcareous eolian deposits Typical profile HI 0 to 7 inches: loam H - 7 to 60 inches: silt loam Properties and qualities Slope: .1 to 3 percent Depth to rostr{ictive feature; More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Weil drained Runoffclass; Low Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit . Moderately high, to high �water ��: , � ��'te��o�nt'hr� Depthto water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding., None Frequency of pending: None Calcium carbonate,, maximum in profile: 15 percent Available water storage in High ��' rrt profile: ��h (about 10,6 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): Se Land capability classification (nonfrri ateo,' :e Hydrologic Soil Group: ,1 Ecological site: Loamy Plains (R067BY00 c 0) Hydrie soil rating: : No Minor Components H ei+dt Percent of map unit: 4 percent ydric soil rating: No Weld Percent of map unit: 4 percent Hydric soil rating: No Keith Percent of map unit 2 percent Hydrae soil rating: No Data Source Information Soli Survey Area: Weld County, Colorado Survey Area Data: Version � Southern Fart 16, Oct 10, 2017 Natural Resources a Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National CO eperative Sod Survey 723-1 Red Barn Subdivision Soil 82 3/12/2018 Page 2 of 2 mitt:blank 6/27/2( Page 26 of M EADOWS m U- a 1 tip 1 1%011 fan413 glint•�I A 4 kifidcit;Or rani al rain • rase are aFra rasa 3S Hd Jerryivicirrit IS Vist'Mitti i .xTrp ° NI =At Won tflk i fire 1orl y CCI ar ?,rWO PHASING LEGEND u put E 3SWWW 6ir EiTsv€0 'd pBad I I l a ro a a. a. ggg riffs lg IJI 11111 *12 1 kl ,I y f .+ x x k x k )C x Ul 020 •Ias ta lUNd Rifkin to tit w 9 ISVNd Grnol iao li zz �o 2 r � r 3 2 a s en C .C ni -c ma 2 se U� s HOI I ESTEAD CO LJJ ccr IPriutndra .a cC F- 0 l F- z O U) CC w ce a sel I V $4 I 4 • 4 t' s - )Ut: blank 6/27/2( aaa- 6 National Flood Hazard Layer FiRMette 4eiylssie 97"N 77 I CIss as a r r-!=.� y�'•�i 11 jai•' I 250 500 ' i'�` Mi �''� a �' '��=T, ,..-:„-;,..J.,01.14%% 11P. .., 1,:. 4 t000 1,500 Feet 2,000 1:6, 000 FEMA Legend 40"12"49,50"N ri co tit E. el SEE FIS REPORT FOR DETAILED LEGEND AND INDEX MAP FOR FIRM PANEL SPECiAL FLOOD HARD AREAS • - - - --` - -- OTHER AREAS OF FLOOD HAZARD IrAfrid a 11' ii G ti+'Zi9S$J'OY - - :.f '<l - g Without anise Flood El t ion (B R/ A, til. A119 With BFE or Depth Regulatory Roadway amp 4€ ,, i OMER AREAS NMI %rid 4 scrtEEhj GENERAL w ss � - STRUCTtfRES ; 1111iNIII in 20.2 0..2% Annual Chance Flood Han of 1% annual chance flood with depth less than one foot or with areas of less than one square rn Future Conditions 1% Annual Chance Flood Hazard zonex Area with Reduced Flood Risk di Levee. See Notes. lane K Area with Flood Risk due to Lew Area of Minimal Flood Hazard Effective LOM Rs Area of Undetermined Flood Hat Channel, Culvert, or Storm Sewe Levee, Dike, or ltodwall Cross Sections with 1 Annual ITS Water Surface Elevation Coastal Transect ,rr" Base Flood Elevation Line OWE) Limit of Study Jurisdiction Boundary ---a Coastal Transect Baseline Profile Baseline Hydrographic Feature save OTHER FEATURES MAP PANELS a is Digital Data Available No Digital Data Available urrrnapppe d ibis map complies with CIA's standards for the use of digital flood maps it it is not void as described below. The base map shown compiles with FEMA's base map accuracy standards The flood herd Information Is derived directly from the authorftathre INIFHL web services provided by FEMA. This rr was exported on 3/12/2Q18 at T_i2;36 PM and does no reflect changes or amendments subsequent to this date a time; The N FiL and effective information may change or become superseded by new data over time. This map Image is void if the one or more of the following elements do not appear base map imagery, flood zone lal legend, scale bar, map creation date, community identifte FIRM panel number, and FIRM effective date. Map Images unmapped and unmodernized areas cannot be used for regulatory purposes. Page 28 of Hydrology Calculations at a )ut:blank 6/27/2( Page 29 of a' Table 6.3. Recommended percentage imperviousness values i Surface Land Characteristics Use or Percentage Imp�ervio �' ° .sness Business: Downtown Areas 9 5 Subu ban Areas 7 Residential to is (last area. only): SLngle-fanny 2. acres or larger 12 0.7. --- 2.5 acres 20 +x,25 _ O 3 5 3 0 acres 0,25 acres or less 45 In+d ustria l: SO Light areas Heavy areas I 90 Par>cs, tern eterlcs 10 Playgrounds 25 Schools 55 Railroad yard areas 50 Undeveloped Areas: Historic flow analysis 2 Greenbelts, ag ri ull ral 2 Off -site flow analysis (when land use not defined) 45 Streets Payed 100 Gravel (packed) Drive and walks 90 Roofs 90 Lawns, sandy soil 2 2 Lawns, clayey soil 6-8 Urban Drainage and Flood Control District Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual Volume 1 March 2017 )ut: btarlk 6/27/2( Page 30 of PA.5E 4 Table 6-5. Runoff coefficientsl a (continued) • Total or Effective ' e impervious NRCS Hydrologic Soil Group C ' . • - 2 -Year 5 -Year 1+0 -'ear 25 -Year 50 -Year 100 -Year' 500 -Year > ii ,;-0,01 -1'.:, 0405 0115 I 0,33 0%40 0,49 0.59 2% 5% 0,03 0408 I! 0,17 0,35 0142 0,5 0,6 10% 0.06 0,12 ! '0421 0,37 Q44 0452 I 0,62 15% 041 0416 0,24 044 1 0,47 0,5.5 0064 20% 0,14 0.2 0428 0143 I 0.49 0151 ' 0.65 25% 0118 024 0.32 I 0,46 I 0,52 0,59 0,67 30% 0,22 0,28 {x,35 I 0149 ' 0.54 0.61 0,68 35% 0,26 0.32 0 3 0,51 0,57 0.63 017 6 40% • -- - 1 � 0.3 3 1 0 43 }t54 0159 _ 0.65 0471 45% 0,34 OA I 0 446 I 0157 0,62 0167 0173 50% 0,38 0.44 0,5 0,6 I 0.64 0%75 55% 0.43 0448 0.54 016 , ,Y 01 0/76 60% 0.14.7 0452 0157 0, 5 0,69 0,73 0,78 - - 65% 0451 01$6 0161 0168 _ 0.71 035 0579 70% 0,56 0,61 0,65 0171 0174 0,77 0,81_ 75% 0.6 0,65 0,68 0,74 0.76 0,79 0.82 80% 0165 0/69 0.72 0,77 0/19 0181 0,84 85% 0,7 0.73 0176 0179 0181 0,83 0,86 034 0177 0,7.E - [ 0.82 0484 0,85 0,87 90% 9S% 0179 0481 0.83 0,85 0,86 0,87 0,89 ---> 100% 0 :3 .D 85 0.87 0,88 0.89 0189 019 1.00 0I.8D t a 0.60 di O 0.40 (120 0.00 0 10 20 30 4-0 50 60 70 80 Watershed Percentage Imperviousnass, % 90 100 --. -� 2- yr ft - -5- -0-10- - - -0-- 50-yr A. 10th-yr Figure 6-1, Runoff coefficient vs. watershed Linperviousnes8 isTRCS HSU A. March 2017 Urban Drayage and Flood Central District 6-11 Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual Volume 1 9 S mit:blank 6/17/N Page 31 of STORAGE DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL (U, 2) r attempt to account for the effects of the WQCV on all control levels whenever it performs watershed -level drainage and flood controt system master plans, 3.2 Sizingof On&Site Detention FacUlties „2,1 Maximum Allowable Unit Release Rates for On -Site Facilities. The maximum allowable unit release rates per acre for on -site detention facilities for a number of design return periods are fisted in Table O-1. These rates apply unless other rates are recommended in a District -approved master plan. The predorrilnant soil group for the total tributary catchment shall be used for determining the allowable release rates. Multiply the unit rates provided in Table SO -1 by the tributary catchment's area to obtain the actual design release rates In cubic feet per second (cfs). Whenever Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) soli surveys are not available for the portion of a county being studied, extrapolate their types using soil Investigations et the site. TABLE SO4 Recommended Maximum Allowable Unit Flow Release Rates (oth/acre) of Tributary Catchment Design Return Period - (Years) A B C & D Nf,CS Hydrologic Soil Group 2 5 10 25 0.02 \a.07 0.03 `Q.18 a 0.04 0.17 N.13 o2g So 0 33 0 -Q 0.44 0.30 0.52 0,56 0.68 L100 0.50 1.00 3 2.2 Emp rical Ecuatlons for the Sizing of On -Site Detention Storage Volumes, Urbonas and Glidden (1983), as part of the District's ongoing hydrologic research, conducted studies that evaluated peak storm runoff flows along major drainageways. The following set of empirical equations provided preliminary estimates of on --site detention facility sizing for areas within the District, They are not Intended for use when off -site inflows are present or when multi -stage controls are to be used (e.g., IC- and 100 - year peak controt) at the storage facility. in addition, these equations are not Intended to replace detailed hydrologic and flood routing analysis, or even the analysis using the Ratbnal Formula -based FAA method for the sizing of detention storage volumes. The District does not pro rnole the use of these empirical equations, It does not object, however} to their use by local governments who have adopted them or want to adopt them as minimum requirements for the sizing of on -site detention for small catchments with in their jurisdiction. If the District has a master plan that contains specific guidance for detention SO -8 06/2001 Urban Drainage and Flood Ccritrot District n it:blank 6/27/2( Page 32 of Hydraulic Calculations mt:blank 6/27/2( Page 33 of .1rare5A gircAs:on,tit La \,.. V 0-.0.1... @ 0,- t s { t +ne't. AG ea lid ; "L-$ C4- le Zit. •A a ot)Lbi tik.V "Thie. ei:%it4 iarta Itba-erk tigsi A- Cri. C C--,e-Rat-Lir, u )ut: blank 6/27/2( Page 34 of I Detention Pond Calculations )ut:blank 6/27/2( N . I A. l_4• n 1 1 441 HL401,1u# 1 1 P 44ku41 ILI )mail %..641 veal Page 35 of NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 8, Version 2 LONGMONT 2 ESE Station ID: 05-5116 Location name: Longmont, Colorado) LISA* Latitude: 40415891°, Longitude: -105.0736° Elevation: Elevation (station metadata); 4950 ft Bowe: ESRI Maps 4i source,: USGS POINT PRECIPITATION FREQUENCY ESTIMATES Santa Paris. 'Deborah Martin, Sandra Pa u.kwic, Ishani Kaye Mlcha l4St, Laurent, Clan Trypeluk, Dale Linn,h, Michael Yakut, Gsniterryr swim NOAA, National Weather Service, Sliver Spring, Maryland EF_Luti r [ P F_gra h_ 1 MaptArgeriat, PF tabular PD -based point precipitation frequency estimates with 90% confidence intervals (1n inches)1 Average recurrence'Interval (years) Duration i 1 ! 2 !, 5 II 10 1 25 50 100 200 500 1000 - t1't Iri 1222 (0.172-0.288) 0.270 (0.208.01,350) 0.366 (0,282-0.477) 1465 (0.356--O.BC9) 0.66 28 (0.470-0.8941 I !(0.571-1.11'1 0.176 0.942 (0.6711-1.33'i ' 1.13 4(0.771.1.71).. 1.41 (0.923-2,1911 II 1 et:IL—N.64 10 I 0.325 (04251-0.422) 0.39 5 (0.305-0.512)11 0.53+6 .413-0.699) 0, 881 (0.521•' ,692) 0.920 (0.701-1.31) 1.14 x.837--1.62' 1.38 (0.981- .02'1 1.65 (1.1322.50), 2.06 (`1,35.3.20) I 2,40 (1.52-3.74 15 -min 3.397 (0.3107.0.515) 0.481 (0.371-0,626) �� 04654 (0.503-0.652) 0,830 (0,835-1.09) 1.12 01.854-1.80) 1.39 (1.02.1.981 1.8$ (1.20-2.47) 2.02 (1.36-3.061 2.51 (1.85-3.91) 2.93 I (1.85-445S) - 30-N<1'11l1 0.537 (�J.415-10.696) 0,647 ((0.500.0,840) 0.876 (0.674-1.141 1.11 . (0.850-1,48) 1.50 (1.14-2,11) 1465 (1.37-2,65 2.25 (1.60-3.31) 2.71 (1.86-4.09' 3.38 (2.21-5,24) 3.x+4 (2, 49.8.12) fits-rrrl R 0.657 (0,507-0,852) 06797 (0.615-1.03) 1.08 (0.834-1,41 1..38 (1.05-1,80) 1.87 X1.42-2.65) 2,31 (1.70-3,30) 11.99411) 2.80 3.36 (2.30-5.08) 4.20 (2.75=6.52) 4.89 (3,10-7.614 - 2 -hr 0.777 (0.607-0.994 0.946)F (0.738-1.2'1) 1.29 (1.00-1.66) 1,65 (1.27.2.13) 2623 (1.72-3.13) 2.76 12.05.3.89) 3.35 (2.41-4.815) 4.02 (2.78.5.99) 5.02 (3.33-7.68) 5.85 (3.174-8.96. 3-hr0.845 X4.665 -1.O7) ll 1.0 3 (0.813-1.31) '1 F42 1,11-1.81 1.80 (1.41-2.31) ' 2.44 1.8913.39 3.01 2,25-4,20 3.65 2,64-5.23 4.37 3.03-6.44 5.431 13.62-8.24) 6113 ,7.81 6 -hr 1.00 (0, 80]0.1 .26) I 1,23 (0.979-1.5 4) 1,69 (1.33-2.11) 2.11 (1.67-2.87 i 2.82 ((2,20-3, 84) 3,i 2, 80-4.721 4.14 3.02-5.82) 4.91 (3.44-7'.12) 8.05 (4.07-9.02))10,54-10.5) I 6,99 , , 1,50 12 -hr 1.24 M.995 -1.521X1.21-1.86) 2.01 (1,61-2.49) 2.49 (1.99-3.10) 3124 (2.54-4.31) 3189 a (2.966-5.22) 4,8O (ri,39.5.35) 5.39 I (3.81-7,66) l 6►53 (4.43.9..66) 1 7.46 (4.90-11.0) , 244111' 1150 (1.22-1.821 1.81 (1.48.2,21) 4 2,38 (1,93-2.91) 2.90 (2.34-3.56) (2.92-4,80 3,69 4,3 lI 5108 (3.l7-6.88) 5,85 (4,17-8,16) 6.96 14.78-10.01 7,86 (5.22.11.4)1 I 2 -day 1.75 (1.45-2.10) 211.1 J (1.74-2.53) 2.74 (2.2:5=3.29) 3.30 (2.69-3S9 4.12 (3.28..5125) 4.0.1 (31.711-6.201 5.63 . 14.14-7.33' 6.30 I (4.53-6.62 7.39 8111-10.4) 8.26 • � ; ,(5.54-11.8) 34" 1.91 (1159-2.27) I 2.28 (1.89-2.71) 2.91 (2A1-3.47) 3.47 (2,66-4,18) 4.31 3.46.5.43. 5.00 (3.91-6229) 5.7 3 L (4,33-7,553) 6.52 (4,72-8,83) 7.62 (,5,30.160.6) 1 8/50 (5.74-12.0) 4 -day 2404 (1170-2.40'1 2.40 12,01-2,84) 3.04 . (2,53-3+61) ` 3.61 12.99-4.30) 4.45 (3.59-5.37 5.115 (4.04-8.53) 5.89 (4,46-7,68) 1 +6.667 (4.85-8.98) 7.78 (5.44-10.8) 8,86 (5.88-12.2) 7' aft LU1.96.2.h1) 2.32=2,723.41 (2.87-4, 00) 4.01 (3.36-4.72) 4.88 (3.95.5,01 5,59 (4.42.6.97) 6632 (4.8348.1'1) 7.09 5.19.9.39 8.16 (5.74..11.1(8.16-12.5) 9.00 10 -day 2.57 (2_ t 8-2.97) 3,00 (2.55.3.48 ) 314 (3.16-4.341 1 4.37 (3.87-S.10Ilk) 5.26 (4.28--6.39) 5.97 (4/5-7.37) 6.70 (5.1428.81i 7.46 (5.49.9.78) 8.49 (6.01-11.5) 9.30 (6.40 -12.8) f) -dad I 3.27 _( 82-3,73) 3.78 (3125-4,31) 4.61 (3.95-5,27) 5,30 (4.51-6.09:_,; 6.2#1 7.01 I (5,83-8.49) 7.71 (6,03-9.67) 8.54 (6.35-11.0) 9.5$ (6.83-12.7) 10.3 (7.20-14.0) ._(5.15-146) — 30 -day ' 3,84 (31.3►3�1.34) 4.41 382 ( . -4, 910 ) 5.33 - (4.1)14 6.05) +6.10 X5.23 631) 7.14 (5,91 8.41 0($.43 7695 9.62) 8,75 (6.83 10.8 9.56 (7.15,12.13 1 10.6 (7.84.13.0 114 (8.01-15,3 ' .! , 45�+da ' 4.53 @.916.5.07') 5.20 (4.54-5.82) 6.28 (5,48-7.05) 7.18 (6.19-B.b6'1 8135 (8.954.71) 9.24 (7.53.10.9s 10.1 7.98.12.3) 11.0 (8.29-13,8) 1211 (8,79.15.8) 13.0 (9.16-1712) , 60 -de 5.10_ill (4.48-5.66) 5.87 (5.1.5-8.53) 7.11 1 (8.22-7.93) (7.05-9.09 I 9.44 (,7.90-10,9) 10.4 (8.54-12.3) 10.34-15.4 12.4 13.6 (9,86-17.5) 14.5 (10.3-19.01; _0,0013.8) 1 Precipitation. frequency Numbers in parenthesis lestimates (fora given duration kipper bounds are not checked Neese refer to NOAA All (PF) are i estimates in this table are based on frequency analysis of partial PE estimates at lower and upper bounds of the 90% confidence interval. and average recurrence Interval) WO be greater Than the upper against probable maximum precipitation (PMP) estimates and s 14 document for more Information. duration aeries (PDS), The probability that precipitation frequency bound (or lass than the lower bound) is 5%. Estimates at may be higher then currently valid PMP values, Back to Top PF graphical h ttps:/Thdisc, nws,noaa . gov/h tsc/pfds/pfds_ printpage.htm i?st=co& eta=0 5-511168,datazidepth&!urns=englistl&lserles= pds 1/4 )u.lt: blank 6/27/21 I .J4 a I•Ltall n1.1 1 RJ4.11iel• 14!414• I I 1 ¢W alCI II4•r " ISOM, Im141 V 4I Page 36 of I a 4 16 14 a 12 tam I•i.•I 15 10 8 I tan 16 14 U fI ft, 10 I 6 4- B a PDS--based dept t-Tdur•atiorfrequency (DDF) curves Latitude. 40.1589De Lortgit.ude: -105036' 1 'I Inale a s •-• • • • I • e. • ♦ i in 4-•• I •sa• 1' I P as ■ . I. I I' t i 1 I. • • • • 1 I ■ h I ? • I a I • ■ • e n e (. tee tau s• Wilt elite s e el■ • t+ s a .. ■ s . a F I • I r • • • I 0 ■ 4 1 I • at • • p a • M I • I ■ s s t O r navigates S a s -a i a s i e s • a • I' • • • a It • • I P ■ II 1 ■ - t. t a a a a a a s u a Imp ha N Duration ra. re �a� r +Iarsi rn 41:11' PI! ; I a • T e ■ • I 4 limn sax all a allie non n in • 1 4 • • a t• : Si• i- 4 a. .• a L l a a a.14111“.00.1e• a a i + Li I 1 s *s . • a we • •tI I I' - • • r s a • • a . • I .. V n -. • • I I 2 I • t a s • • I • • a • I i • a • a a 4 I I 5 10 NICIAA Atlas 14, Volume Ft, Versiatl'2 I A a t a s . a -t Ma 25 a i • 4 i. - - _•_ _ - - �I erns t - I • • • y • • i • I • • • a M • i I 50 100 Average recurrence interti i (years) . • • . arts • I I 2,00 I I. 1 astiamestarans 50Q 1000 Created (GMT}: Sun mar U p:22:03 2018 Back to Top Maps & aerials Small scale terrain Average recurrence interval (yearsq 1 2 S SI 1 25 50 — • 100 sa 200 Hop — 1000 ..�. s- 1!n 10 -min i5-rnn 50 -min 2-lr ----• 3 -hr 8 -fir • 24 -hr 2 -day — 3 -day -ay as 7 -day 10 -day 20 -day 30 -day ea 45 -day 50 -day I ittpkni+'tr rise. riws.r losa.tjuv/hdsc/p1ds/p1ds fii irflpsgth ttril?s ket& f9=05-5118&rdH to =depth& units-engl Psis &series = pda mtbtank 2/4 6/27/2( a Page 37 of i i i I I •!I r c' is r. di fir _3_ _mw_ - Large scale map Etwt.) tith Large scale terrain i .04 Py r 100km • • 1 ON It Forest.. f'' U41 chary Finrct 1 • .J Foil Ciotti a xp 4 100km f d.p r =° I i Cie cone Greeley karnonit r a•b. - Y Large scale aerial https://hdsc,nws.ncaa. gav/hdsc/pfds/pr'ds jrint p age. html ?st'co& stagy=O5- 511 t&datadepth&units= en gllsh &series=pd s 3/4 t: blank 6/27/2( Page 38 of e3Aisitu 14 a af4isen tu DETENTION VOLUME BY THE MODIFIED FM METHOD Proj act; 723-1 REDGAR N SaeIn ID: BASIN A•HISTORiC PRE-CEVELOPED C01YR DEAD RELEASED AT 10 -YEAR HISTORIC (Fox catchments less then 160 sores only. For forger catchments, use hydregra ph routing method) i i 13sterminaliorl or MAJOR Detonate Volume Using ModIlled FAA Method Date ► ilnallan of MINOR Detention Volume Using Modifier, FAA Method ()stolen �1'it�1'1'11�4110F1 ��la�u�1. tit l' " rw Catchment Oralnega imperul©usnais I. = 2 40 percent Catchment Oratnag* Impsrsiouanasa 1. ZOO Iorcerl r;atrhr't.M1 i"ltaln#0rk Aro A = 134 0011 a me Catehment llrairtige Area A - 119 OM errs, Pteda4slapment NfaC3 soil Group Type = C A, 8, C, or 0 Pra'dsvaioprrient WRCS Sall Group fife 2 C- A. B, Clef C Return Period rur Detention Control T = 10) J yeaic (2, 5, 10, 25, 64, or IDOl ttetum Period for Oatenlion Control T * I 10 visit (2, 5, 10, 25 50, or 1091 Time of Concentration of Wolflike. Tee an, minutes Time al Dantectrallcn of Weterahed To ■ 20 minutes Antra VS trnd knows Bald q a 0,40 ENJOIN newest., urn 4dog a.,94,14 R : a T (Wane Cna•hcur Preeipfellon pt a 11.74) lochs One -hour Precljakellon P, • 2,se Inches O.aign Rainfall for Fsdmnia It C,' PiliC3rT,}'•C, Coefficient One Cy e f 54 Design Rainfall 11)WW Formula I - s31` F'illthei.)'•t:a cGutrclent One GI. a 71,ea __ , eneffIcleritTwo ri c 10 Caofltfl/nt Twa CZ 1.0 Coefficient Three Ci * 0.789 CaerTiclent Three Ca a. 0.7'99 I e au nfgU 1- '. .;. a t. a tt r :0 1 r.• ass ,nittilale j: ..,. a tri t l lin V _' 1454 iN raw k; TIATI MIHe-hrTnn-rn; Runoff Coetficlent Co 011 Runoff Com McJerd o a 0.25 Inllew Peak Ronal OF -In 2 385.49 cis Inflow Paaic Runrltl Op -in = @tit t cis Allorwsbia Park CUtiiow gala Op-a�ut 4 41.70 cis Atkrxeelr Peak Outflow Ralf 4p-outv -- -41.1U ste Mod. FAA Major Storage Volume= 701,312 cubic ,set r Mod, FAA I',Ilriat storage Volume - 51:229 cubic feet Mot. FAA Major Wray', Volume II 16,100 *Cf. rf Mod. FM Minor Storage Volume a i,ifl6 Anti -ft -- I c- Er11.lir Rrgola'_l t3Uta.tinn t ,i4.t. an 141 Incttia4,e V s *$1:4r_p fa. I. 5 rot S-Minutai Ri hen MAO* minutes to , ReInlall Ittlensfty Inchee 1 hr ,yitiAL. Inflow Volume acre-feet - A4ltratmettl Factor nit' Average Outflow eta nut,La. , Outf ow Volvma ecruteat foul. id eert•tret Storage 5+ckwme a .0, Rainfall ©urallmn minute; . , Rainfall Intensity inchsa r h' act • inflow Volume •cra-teH ti, at Adjvslirient Factor `m' oldtid r AV41994 QuloW cis a •kit Outflow Vajurne acresf'4at out Mottos Volume e=rt-teet w . 2 _ 1123 _ 2114 1.00 41.10 0.115 - _ 7.01'4 7 5.&1 056, 1130 4170 01.115 0.430 4 419 U 875 1,00 41.10 0 230 0,749 4 0.45 3 883 1SD 411.70 0.230 -7•x51 6 4.815 8246 loo 41.70 0:1142 4.1104 Q 4 41 1 318 1-300 0(70 a-345 0,973 102 1.541 L •: 1170 1:. X16 � tM! ' tie tin t 1.0 AIM O: Q . sal l l 14 3,70 5,842 1112 41.70 1,264 RI 7.81 7`.:3.11 LOD i spa 0874 6756 S2 3 4 2050 1.00 41,74 fib 1.354 12 LOS 100 4120 _ uses 7.470 14 650 9.868 1.00 41.7'0 4.804 toe -c 3-2.11 2.233 1.00 41,70 0.864 1.'414 3.1)1 2_309 LIN Al TO 0.0911 1.417 16 8 10 O;Ix3El 1.40 41.70 11119 8,817 ii 214 1642 1.00 41:70 1.034 1.648 IS 5,14 101..11 MO 41.7'0 1.0034 9081 20 5.45 10417 1.40 41.70 1.140 5 4;78 207 -tilt 2.625. 100 41,70 1 149 1,62'6 o 714 2197 0.05 34.80 1 2{x8 1390 22 I 6.18 11.130 0 98 39 40 1206 fl24 24 4.24 11.575 0_➢2 31.23 1- at 19,311 24 143 2°201 0,32 34,23 1264 1,946 21 2-33 3012 015 39;49 IIA21 i,69t 26 412 it ilia OS ag,82 LW 10.024 29. - *A2 %I2RF MO 37.74 1.5/0 10.911 2e 2.23 MOE 0311 16.74 1470 1.730 10 4.31 173% 981 art=7'S 1.436 11 292 30 2..14 3,196 0 83 34.75 5.436 1.762 32 ! 209 3 282 0' 81 13 fib 1:443 1,1617 _ 32` 4 16 53.043 0161 33 8$ 1,+193 11 570 34 403 43.384 0.78 3311 1,651 11.822 _ 4 3 i In 3 352 0 ?D 33.11 11%1 1011 38 3.99 13,475 0.1e 32.43 1.809 12.1070 35 1.117 7.4371 8.70 7143 1 Cole 5.8n 3o Las 3,611 2/0 31.62 1.1360 1,842_ as 0 1 _ 13,1367 _ 0,720 I 11.82 1. 12.299 40 a 84 p 14.:231 0,75 31,26 1723 12.607 +1 1,110 3.578 0.T 31 24 1 723 1 852 42 113 14.467 0.74 _30)9 1,701 12.706 1:74 3 8+10 0,74 30,71 1.761 1.859 44 I.81' 3.701 0,73 1.938 1.183 44 3 43 14,731 0.73 3013 1.836 1218'93 _AR 49 3.33 14,5 0.72 an 1.1195 13.470 46 1614 31054J2 2892 1,896 1 965 41 1.60 3 Si T 0.71 29,64 1.953 1.144 II 3.14 1%, I9O 4,71 *64 1.083 13 237 -- 7 16 I6,445 0:10 29 In 7_010 13.295 60 1,56 3,871 0,70 28 519 2.60 1860 32 3 D7 16.4112 0.69 28 e7 2.565 13 044 67 1.52 3. 6641 28 87 2066 1;rit r. 54 1.48 3,973 4.051 28 57 126 1,0e 54 7.0^4 16.111 OM a8,51 2.2,2$ 13.486 L J. 54 1.44 4.121 MS 2.11.36 _ 1_1631 LOX S4 203 55004 019 28.30 2.113 13,921 I 375 2.66 15.192 0,07 28,04 2240 13 949 U 1.41 4:0818!. 4.41'.17 31.04 2.240 1,124 txp 1.1s 4.113 4,97 27 80 2 268 1.1316 84 179 16.309 0 67 27 80 2.298 14.071 62 11..33 4.167 4,89 27.6,1 2.355 1642 412 2 73 10.643 0.6$ 27 511 2,355 14 lee 64 -- 2.67 10/15 0.66 V 31 1412- 14.299 04 1.:12 4,$69 ©.se 2x_37 _ 2.412 5,786 6e 1.28 4.240 0-05 27.1T 2.470 1110 I 56 It 10.476 016 17,11 1470 14 405 86 i 274 42112 0.85 26..96 2527 1, 21 ft ?,$1`' 17'•: Oar 2,9,96 2527 14.506 74 1,24 4.319 0,94 29,95 2.4196 , 1134 10 7- 51, 17',1 13.4 .- 24.,31 2.515 54 803 72 1 za am, 1642 LI le 12 2 47 17.337 0 e4 2664 7_642 54.896 74 1.16 4.383 01,44 75.49 PM _ ,.5231 74 2,42 17.483 0.64 20.49 2.700 14.704 76 2.31 sine f1,fl3 26.34 1757 14 669 79 7.17 k-INI 863 2!0,34 2.767 I.ei2 10 1,15 'il,443 013 26.4 20101 1,848 778 2.33 57.784 0.63 25.24 2014 1#,860 80 129 12 900 - 0,63 28 06 7.972 16:47111 tO - Iii 4.407 063 26.06 2.872 5,920 62 2.26 18.1332 4.62 25 04 2,5211 Silo? e2 1.11 4.631 062 26 94 2 929 1,;001 44 13.1 16.191 4.812 75•.61 a 287 it .177 Jl�l 1.14 4.1S3 0 62 25A1 2.957 cue me 2.18 18:28,7 6.1,62 36.70 1044 16.243 116 1.97 4.695 0,82 35.70 3,04.4 1,551 04 2.14 12,410 0.61 25.60 2102 16 303 89 1.06 4.628 4,61 35 60 3-10? LAVA sc1 211 1.0.531 9,0i 2:6 40 3159 14 377 90 1.04 4,455 O e1 25.45 3 189 1.497 92 2 QS 1 !417 4,51 25 36 3 211 16 432 92 1 02 4.8513 0.61 2638 3:217, 1,4671 94 244 18.74115 0.67 _ 25 20 3;274 10.491 94 1.131 4/16 0.61 2620 1.274 1.441 9e 0.30 4.74'! 6, 21 ye 3.31 1.413 98 291 16 Bib 0.60 26 18 3.331 16.641 98 -� 1 AR 18HO 0,,10 25.11 3.289 16 600 91 11.19!8 4.TP I 440 28 11 Lao 1,382. _ 100 floe arloe _ 064 25 02 3A49 1,362 lee ..----1,00 19.098 0.60 2.11 02 3.440 Oa eat 102 airifir I iiire 0:16,3 24 94 3.644 1.322 102 1 03 19 206 080 24.44 1 4 16.295 104 1.90 19.310 •9.60 2.41 1.561 115_?40 101 014 4,652 I 24 96 3,641 1.221 lel 120 I 19 413 14.6 am r. 1.611 14:705 _O;6a 100 0.92 4.876 0.59 24.76 3;619 1.269 11419 1 45 j 19 515 6.3a 24,71 3 B76 16..834 408 091 4.903 0.69 24.71 3 276 1.227 110. 113 I(iow' a 5'0 24,11 3 733 16 891 110 -� OM 4.928 0,69 24 84 3 733 11.106 it's 1.10 19.112 13.tr* -y 1 191 10.021 512 2.113 4.933 0 54 24 57 3 791 1.102 l tit 1 78 104118 0,59 3:840 16..960 114 0:46 4.977 459 24 ,51 '.►,41'41 1 +2 118 0..97 6.001 0.69 24.44 1.0112 1.095 118 1.76 10.903 LSD 24,24 3 808 14417 116 1.14 19W998 041 24..70 3 963 16.033 118 0, 85 5.024 0 S .24.E 3 963 1 1431 120 1.71 20.089 0.64 24.35 4 024 58 067 129 0.54 a 047 O_41# 24.38 4.021 1.1127 122 P, 1.920 38 +76 ti;166 24.27 _ 4.070 161C•3 air2 0,433 SUI 0.54 2427 4 1376 0.992 Meet FAA Mama 5ieraie Volume Outdo ft; - 111,220 Mctt. IFAA r4'J:Qr 3q era' a Yo um.lcuble 17.1 ■ Mod. FAA Minor 5MQrape Volume leer--A.I = 1.8848 Mad, FM Major Storage Volume !acre -84 • WIDFCD DETENTION BASIN VOLUME ESTIMATING WORKBOOK Version 2 35, Released January 2,115 723-i BASIN A? -11-I9 LID-.acicrIUcn PRE DeeveicipmenValvn, M,nfInsil FAA, 16 04.211 111317010 8.46 AM )Ut:blatlk 6/27/2( Page 39 of -- WIN -WI DETENTION VOLUME BY THE MODIFIED FAA METHOD 04Srou Oita (Ch k i Project: 7234 REDSARN Basin IDt BASIN A-HStORSCh PRE-UEVt.OP'ED (100YR DEVL'D RELEASED AT 10 -YEAR HISTORIC'', Volume (acre-feet) 25 20 10 Inflow and Outflow Volumes vs. Rainfall Duration CIO. n0,0000000 0 6000000000 0 Cyr 20 40 60 80 Duration (Minutes) 100 120 r 4b rn, Inllnt Yohwe. —A - n at ilatrn Outlive* 4'osn a MM of 0loan StoragmktiThasa • Maim 6 ianw Ineoyr Yo lune tit* *WOM Cahn, hn, VS*an. + Y year S arm Statietit Vlsiwn4( 140 t1DFQa DETENTION MMSJN VOLUME EST'tMATING WORKBOOK Version 2.36, Released January 2015 7Th V BASIN A 3-t1-1$ Ua-Oatt alian_PRE Oevolaprn ntxlsrn,, &MAEd FM 1/1312Dtes t:Ie AM )ut: blank 6/27/2( Page 40 of I ;NJ felA. „SPA ‘14 Ce DETENTION VOLUME BY THE MODIFIED FAA METHOD Project: 723.1 REDSARN Basin ID: BASIN B (PRE -DEVELOPED HISTORIC RELEASE) (For catchments less than 1160 awes only. For larger clitcthrnan(s, use hyctrclarap4i routing maithotii Determination of MINOR Detention Volume tieing Modified FAA Method Detarminatlenn of MAJOR Detention Volume Using Modlftod FM Method ratan ,I.P.19.intalicil BEIM& - 1)42! an Itian 19.k�411 I:C17ou.: Catchment Drainage impervFcutnass I, = 2.00 person( Catchrneol Drainage krwarviousntss I, it 2.00 p{itICrol Cattment Ore[nerglr Arerl A ° 043,f f11 s Catchment Dolma* Ain h e IONO erre, PiedeaelrSpRtent MRCS 5of1 Group Type s A. B.C. old Piedevelopment t4RCS Self Group TyP-4 = C A, B, O, or D Return Pcifod tar Detotiltcn Control r = li} yelle 12.6, 14, 26, 80, or 1001 Return Period for Delendorr CanUol I rI 109 hers (2, 6 10, 25, 50, or 1001 Time of Ccncrnlrellon of Walarshed Tc a 'Q rnlq Via% Time of Concentration on edwahtsl Tc a .' minutes Movable Unit Ratan* Rata q = G theme }ctlawable Unit Release Rail q * a: _ dummy On&-hAur PracJpfellon F'1 w 13S %chat One -Own Precipitation P, a 224 kocheb Uaaign 61alnial( 10F Futrrruia j - i:,' P,iiGf+ T,"j^C;a Design H.{ntall ICIF Faimuli i - C,' ?ifles* I,lAC;r Corlildsni Dne C, A 25,60 Coefficient Sane C, = ? i6.Q Coefficient Two CI ;1 10 Coefficient T`�a , C7 a 10 Coefficient Thr4a G3 :, a 782 Coe f}1cltni Thies Cy a- 0,7f 3 -Hlrrn rial one vatraes uj ow am , e 4a.In Calculi le I. atlo. a1 en at va1'Afte atga'tTr�am tha alas ,aloe elad • Runoff Coefficient C = 0,26 Runoff Cnamlcieni C 0 0 51 Inpew Peak Runoff Qp-in C 55.99 __ Cts Movable Pink Ouif10w Rale C1p-cut a,_ 34&4 tit I inflow Peak Runoff 14p4n a 22244 oft AK�lrable Peek Outflow Rah Cap -Put 2 _ 141.04 - oh Nod. FAA Meier Storage Volume A 4i}2C,1993 Guth) fed Mod. FAA Minor b1orsus Volume gi. 46,,761 cubic Net Mod. FAA Minor Storage Volume le1ST) acre -ft Mod, FAA Major Storage Volume ■ L281 acraA 2 'C- nler Aalnhll ©uration insaalnaniai Invests Velum keg. S for 5 -Mindful- Rainfall octillion minutes . Rainfall IntiMrlky Inhet 1 hr cuuto Inlow Valurttet aura -fern (actQull Adjustment Palter 'm' tuldoutk Avarice Ntgvy it Otrl4Ru1-1, DWtiow Valttm4 acre-toet (WOLK\ -11 Storage Volume acre -leaf (cuto+ 1 R4lnhill Octillion rrilttutes Sirtokrtt Y RalrNli Intenstty Inchon. / hr f otclPUkt_ _ Inflow Vaiumf acle-foal 4autect‘ Adjustment Fedor tin' batdoittl Mantas Oiitrlow etb {WW1 Outflow Volume acres -feel koitt.wAl, storage Voluma acrd -feet Loulglstt I 5k 54 0117 1 DO 2'4.010 01,0415 01 at I 2 1113 1.783 1 a 74 00 0 068 1.187 4 4.90 0,562 1,00 24 00 0,132- 0.,+130 4 9,25 2.23S 1.+ - 24 00 .4-132 2104 b 4-11 0/51 I.OU 24_10 0.181 4.560 ! e I a li 3.010 t OD 24110 0 186 2620 4.7. cite' , 1.0e 24.04 13,264 11.947 id: Ltd 3.049 1,M, 3.q;an 0201 1.4012 + 3,70 i.0€a 1,00 24.00 0 331 0.720 10 7.61 4,219 Saba 24.iM0 0.331 3,8115 3 43 t ,00 24 04 + + 4.098 Lae 24 t}0 0 397 42119 3.70 1,00 24,00 r 6.116 1.00 24,40 b_4fi3 4,652 5.458 1,50 2464 a,' wfi' 4.959 3.01 I . CHU 2~l.gl9 , . , 144 21114 M3) 1,00 24.E Diet 0 464 1a S,7gi 6,8244 1.'043 -2410 6.695 6,220 20 1 2.89 i 1.5413 1,04 24.00 0 641 0,879 20 6,+16 4,14241 1,00 24.40 0,631 6;,87 22 3.55 1.50 0.96 23 91 0.554 4416 2Z 6 18 6:465 0.06 72 01 4614 6.712 24 243 _ 1,874 0112 23.119 0,727 D 847 - s 24 {,94 _ 6,582 4 9'2 ? .D0 3,127 5.,836, 24 4.72 0.02 0.88 21.23 D_7$D 6.1361 26 2.313 1233 lee 34.23 0.760 a 073- 20 4.52 7.119 0.90 2011 0.713 _ 0.328 25 1.709 0,8C 247 67 ® 0_793 0.608 30 2,14 1.141 0.63 2{1 00 0 8'28 1,014 34 4 94 I 7.326 0,63 29.00 0020 6 4419 72 2.06 1.084 0.51 18 613 0 060 1 030 32 4 16 7.519 0,81 T1160 0:580 6 889 1 34 tie 1.11;1$ 4„N 'e9l.l Q -003. _ 1.042 34 4,03 7)111 0,79 19 oe 0.403 d.6013 ; as I tee 1.9171 O 111.7 0120 1,1152 MI 31.119 r.Sira 0.718 0103 ewe 01=47 3 6 U6 2919 - 0.75 18 32 01969 CO{#4 36 3,74 6.0)6 Ot ?0 1, 842 0.454 LOP ' 40 1.10 2.059 {3.76 18 90 0.092 1.008 40 3.84 6. leo 0,76 10 D0 0 902 7.129 42 124 2.D95 0.74 47 71 11,26 1.070 42 3.53 41.3'x11 0,14 17.71 1.!025 7.313 404 1.69 Z130 0473 17 45 1,058 1,172 44 3.43 a..478 On 17 45 U58 1.421 4f! 3 J,3 8.013 0,72 1722 1.091 7.622 d6 1.14 2.154 0.72 17 12 1 lei i 973 40 3 24 9.742 0.71 1'7.40 1,124 7.810 +19 tea 2197 0.71 17.00 - 1.124 1.972 + EQ 124 2.228 0.70 16.80 1.167 1.071 50 a ie 6.866 l E1,74 ia.ae 1.167 7,71}9 6? 152 2256 9-_09 15 62 1.19U 1 uaa WI 3 D7 1,985 I 0.89 1081 1.190 7 795 3 t#0 9,140} 0$; 18.44 'c.223 7 877 1I: 1,71 ?2.b9 if3. 4 1-221 1.1PM 1A4 2 girl e.Ot 15.7'9 t ;lfe L054 50 ti'9 9211 0114 10.29 1.266 7.956 31 7.411 2.341 a? 18.14 1.2 ISM 54 2.48 0.318 esti? 16.1'6 1,20 4.021 1,38 2.367 067 16,00 1.322 1 045 84 220 4,01 0,67 1600 1.322 9.981 B2 1 36 2.392 089 16 87 1.3£4 1431 92 2.73 9,571 Oa 15 87 1 355 6 1as 84 ! 112 _2_417 D.56 15,16 { -388 l-0(703 84 2.67 _ 0,515 11.416 16.78 1,358. II 2311 01$ 1,20 2.440 0,65 1551 1-421 t .a1r1 65 2.62 9.712 OAS 16.04 1 421 6.291 _ 66 1.215 2-453 0.65 15.113 - 1.456 1404 as 2.67 0.8f}3 015 111,63 1 466 6149 70 124 2.466 0644 16,455 1 481 0.'098 70 2.61 Q 892 0.884 1Fi_43 1.466 8 484 72 1.22 2 but 004 _ 16.73 1.42'1 Omit L3 2A? 0.976 0464 01 16.39 1.521 6 451 14 Lis we 0e4 15 21 1,44 • 0..67'!5 74 2,42 10tt16F 0.64 1112{ 1,334 I a..400 TO 1.17 2.640 f}.63 16.1.6 1.587 ewe +Td! 2_a7i 110.14 4 O:oJ 16.101 16 7" 5.687 79 i, i+6 2 161 0.63 15,09 1020 4 949 76 233 IGfll .G3 Ib,!Ofl i.52D ! 6{04 80 1.13 2.581 0 08 16.00 1 053 1}13$ 80 229 14.302 10.63 16 b41 1 553 6.649 62 1,11 2.une 062 14,83 1-891} 0 922 87 2„25 1.880 8 582 84 2.21 10 452 042 14 38 1,710 0,733 14 1,09 11126 4152 14:18 ! 1,711 4 2O e0 211 04.526 0.62 11.79 1.752 0.773 96 1.07 1644 0.62 14.711 1.752 4,852 88 1.D6 2.802 ___ 4,01 14.73 1.786 OSP 89- 214 - ia.6Sii1 '0,61 14.73 1.785 4211 g0 1.04 2080 0.61 _ _ 14.57 1.816 _ 0 882 90 2 11 I O,t36ft 0161 i4 Bt 1816 4447 92 142 2..ccr 0.61 1441 1.451 11!4,6 era 211 14}_733 651 54,61 1 851 8 882 R-0 1.01 2'.114 051 14 d3 I,IIIM. 6i 14.55 1894 i1018, 35tell 15.i191ji Or60 Gs1.1r4 1,0.17 1.841 96 9419 2.730 i 0OO 14.601 1, 947 1111.3 .- 0'fi 1,6..50 4.019 4.03 2.7441 0.40 14.40 1.fi10 0796 100 098 _ 2 762 0,60 1.4 40 1-913 0771 _ 100 1 1 10;992 0 rQB will 1JOI3 9,006 102 085 Z77-7 0.00 14.35 2.017 [130% 102 1.93 1111353 fi•.60 14.35 2.017 9.037 1b4 0.94 7142 0,00 14„3T 2450 0.743 104 1.94 ¶1.114 abe 14..31 2050 9.064 _ 140 9..92 2.801 049 1.4.26 2.083 0:726 100 1,!66 11.173 0.69 2.083 0.090 106 0..01 2 8t _ 0.,68 1422 2116 0.706 _ 108 2416 tile 114 0.90 2838 9,59 14.16 a 140 0681 1111 1 58 11.2aQ 0,64 14,16 2149 9,140 112 0,69 2851 0511 14.14 2182 9681 112 1.4 51.316 d 11.,14 Z112 1.163 114 0 AA i681 0,59 2215 0,4441@ _ _ 114 1 ?8 111 401 6,69 14,) i 2 216 0 186 1118 i 0.07 2 078 oho 1.4 -01 - 1246 _- 0-630 110 174 mites 4.59 14.01 2.240 0207 1116 I US 2,692 01441 14.93 2241, .04111 111 1,14 11,1911 0,58 14,03 2281 0,220 120 0,M ',�' . °: Oil 14,00 2344 WI 174 1.71 11 1 (LSO 14;.i7a 3114 0.247 5n gas, 2818 4;51 13_;7 7.34T 0:571 122 1.61 11,013• 0.11$ 13,67 7.311 4,256 Mod. FAA Minot Sunige WeIurno fault MOP* 44,1'61 hod. !AA iwlO, Siouan Volume (aunty it) • Mod. FAA Minor ulorage Volume racra•t1.j - 1.0732 Mod, F14A M Or Storage Voluma lacre•11.l • (JCFCD DETENTION BASIN VOLUME ESTIMATING WORKBOOK \torsion 2.35, Released January 2016 723•I BASIN B 3-1 155 IJUJ Da4eoticn_ PRE Develupnlentaltm, fr1.oJlrad f=Ad 115,6321 9,2481 5''1372018, a 61 AM k i Kit: blank 6/27/2( Page 41 of $6So'c3.5 roast C. i i i J J DETENTION VOLUME BY THE MODIFIED FAA METHOD Project: 723-1 REDBARN Sash ID: BASIN B {PRE -DEVELOPED HISTORIC RELEASE Volume (acre-feet) 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 Inflow and Outflow Volumes vs4 Rainfall Duration rafla .. - .�.... ��. .� i.. G .i, ii• ..- ate.. I- _ ._.- - . anmaart.liesem _. • • • a • - e , • 0000 ocdoio - ----a — _ ---a n- a _ • �.•a-.Ili ,_ it • - =tat is* ._. tareree i- .a 00000000000 0 20 40 80 80 Duration (Minutes) �- 100 120 140 +■� MPill ilgr.raril Y +wi!%Ns Mai fftVk nt a Minn ttnr Straps Vaunt rNor dant Name Vats toip WryVaium + SO* II liwym vtiviikJ UDFGCI OETENTION BASIN VOLUME ESTIMATING WOR<aOOK Version 2.35, Released January( 2015 723-t LASIN a 3-11-18 UD•Otienaon_PRE O*viiopm*ni.xitttt, Mcdtfiaal FAA f St 3113/2418, l:bl AM )ut:blank 6/27/2( Page 42 of I r DETENTION VOLUME BY THE MODIFIED FAA METHOD Alt Project: 123-1 REDBARN Basin ID: BASIN A DEVELOPED TO RELEASE AT 10 -YEAR HISTORIC RATE (For catohm. nts less thin 16n acres only, For larger oato hman4s, use hyrdrograph routing method) Determination of MINOR Detention Volum, Using Mollified PM Mithod daienmina11an of MAJOR Detention Volume Using Modified FAA Method pilumi, f o t o. 1 Lt, -f 9._. U i tli Celthnierwt Dr+iirfage Irripervltneneae in 4 84:01! neat-nl Caichmerit Drainage Irrivithloillhaat I. = 70,0(1 wan, Catchment ti(itnage brae A a ` NM' 'G roam Patet.men1 lreln.p■ A:04 A = 1#9.000 EMI Prrreavelopmint AC8 8o11 Group Type ,. C A. B. O, ar D PredevreloprnentNF4CS 8x11 Group Type a C A. Ell, G, or() Reimer Palled far Detention Camel Tel , tea ,fin (2 6, 10, 26, 64, or 1001 Palorn•*Mod km pot.nllbp Central T .C 1941 plan (2. 5, 10, 25; 5a, If 10D) Te S Time of Canteniratten of Watershed To ; 70 impurArra rime ae Germsil ntre u,a.n aMilt 11re4 20. - miPitrto Allowable UnH Release Rate q i 0,34 .Olsten Mawalrte Von Thal 8411 RAP q _, : 0 II) r:lilacrw Ons-halt PitcIpitadflrn P, - , 1.at1 tom One -t wur Preclptteilan P, 2 i0 Iircewt Design Rainfall I0F Formula I - fir' R+f(C1+'TerGt - aaslg►i R.inrall IbF Fnr+nUl• l - Zs. P4/(C2I-T,l'Ct ceemtdett One C, A ! 78,60 Co.Hlclent One Ct - 28,50 Coefficient Two co - 10 Coet}icieni TWO in Cae01cIen( Thom C1 - 0.7'64 Cattfident Threw C EJas Dalnrminatt+erw ®If Ave a! a iritirri sa -_ Ai lit o ..4 a •_ : u er 0.714)fi o +rsr4 eSL_.qof frcrn !ho aa#xn ri si la ke.sa ,z•. I unoll CeeNjelar►t 0= 0 54 I 9.anotr Caatflcianl Cr.' a 73 Woe Peak Runoff Op -Ilk s 9.04 ch Inflow Peak Minot! Op-Ir1= 853,21 chi Allowable Peak 0A,r111ow Rale c1p,eut s 41.10 chi Allowable Ptak Outflow Rafe Op -out = 41.70 ;f. - Mod. PM Minor Stains Volum4 -' 344 ,0192 cubk feet MS. FAA MOW Storage Volume a 1,0101,464 cubic feral i=. Mod, FA.A'1,4 Witt 3ttw14, i %hiKie s tk_404 acra•11 1 Mod. FAA Major Mortice Volume ■ 24.104 sera-ll c. Enter Rainleil Duration Incremental Increase ValuaHire.. a • a r ply. ►owing Rainfall Cturolloo minvliv •ot Intensity ;noble R'alniatl / hr Of L3. Inflow Volume ecrtfeirl . • Aiiluehnanl Factor 'rte' Q i,Et Average Outflow chi a • tit Outflow Valuma serer -feet a • Storage Volume ette-isel .a+rt • ul, Rainfall I Duration minutes f I rk • ut, 444100 Inienaityr Inches I hr r taut • uR. iriflaMe Volume scrt.tael *Ui f 1 ' ,+1u iustment Fedor 'm' . OM f ut] ?ser$ge OttJjdee cfa (Al in Witt Outflow '~taw s germ -14e1 to utPv11. Storage Volum acre -feel tautpui - 5.54 _ 1.357 1.00 41,74 0 116 11.247 11.231 3.14! - 1.00 41.741 0.115 1.025 4,90 24,63 1.00 41_'70 6.230 2.1-11 4X95 acSrli 1,04 1.210 11.230 6.331 4.41 3.944 1.00 4i.iD 0.346 :.8809 08.412 7.508 1.40 4170 0.346 T,t03 4th: 7942 1.44 41„1 Q' 0.4216 a 141 a A 1R 5 1.21 1.2x2 4fl la rr 21860 fi 860 13 - 3 70 4.534 4.00 41.70 ,4.#,74 '3 958 10 7..51 10 493 1.00 41 _]0 o 674 9 914 T 19 3:43 tiL04 ' 4.00 4124 0.449 4.367 12 OM 11878 1.00 14 220 5401 1.40 41.70 0J04 4.663 1# 9 50 1222"1 1.04 41, 0 0.60+1 1Z. 4i r6 3.0'8 5 ®901' t,OO _ 41.70 0919 MO _ 13 41.40 UM 4120 4.410 12.?30 if! 134 5.259 1.00 41.70 1,034 0.224 18 5176 14.483 1,0048!.184 t.O1t4_ 13.440 2D 2 611 5 685 1 -Da 41.70 i_ to 5,4.8 213 I SA5 16:240 LOCi 41,70 1,.149_ 14,001 _ 22. 255 i 8 584 0:95 1910 1-240 11.1170 2rd 11.141 IS.032 0k$ I )SE,aO 1.208 14,720 ' 24 2.43 7 189 0.92 3e 23 1.2 4 0.;92 3a 23 1:284 15 305 2,33 7.014 15.88 3 4.321 4_093 29 432 17 15O 0.81 30.A 1.321 1513► 20 2.23 7'55ti 4.21 35.4 1,371 0 272 25 4 62 ii.706 a 88 35.74 1.379 1e 427 3Q2147 1!12 6,83 8ti_7a 1.4;41 5 43d 30 I 4 34 la 218 083 3425 1 434 10.7 32 r-6- 1,493 $ 580 32 4.18 80,094 6:81 3 1.493 ,90 34.1,P133,11 1,551 9.724 34 4.43 Ili 1GS 4.79 33.11 1 561 1a.11 3611 92 0,78 32_431.501 1,854 811 3.89 19:5131 o n 33.3 1:508 i? 1171 -s, A :. 0,036 - 34,1121 AI B.O69 36 3.78 19 484 0.74 31,42 1.660 18-3183 40 LAD of 801 0:.70 31.15 1.723 7,D76 #D 3 84 20,31 0.10 an 1,723 I e 846 12 t:74 6;1180 0.74 34.78 1.781 7. if0 t 43 20.730 0,74 7&78 1.731 1@.855 444,43 OW 0.73 20.33 1 838 7:217 424 a,4+3 21.084 0,73 3013 1 838 14 248 4e1144 , • : 0..n 20:92 1.106 7.3026 40 0. _21,421 0.7_7 39,11$ 1,BQS 14,526 40 1.60 9„396 4,71 *5* 1_156 7.442 48 3 74 21242 0:71 26.54 1.053 18. r0@ 80 1,58 la 67x5 0..10 ; $ a 10 7.:1418 50 a I@ 2 .o5D f],7D 29.19 2.0117 40.044 ,.---- 62 1.52 9�llsi?5.il� iT 2G �89 62 3.47 22.94E 4 O!9 26 87 2068 7.2 8 211,57 2.b 864 �� - a ezz o e4 24.67 214E zf>' 561' l 1.44 9.898 O.18 26.30 2,1137,716 0.68 -_ 71.30 ;1031 2*,Ilik t 41 10.013 0,67 24,04 2.240 7 77331! 2.6 28,173 067 20 04 18".240 44-146 0 I .sI 10 124 0.57 27 0) 1268 7.020 60 2 tf1 23.4,30 tee 27„10 31.133 1.35 10 231 0.58 17 51 2.354 7,er. 2,11 23,07 GM 1'.58 21.324 84 10,334 • :: 4..67 23.920 t .: 27 37 - 2..41'2 21.505 u ad1,29 10.437 045 27:11 i 4.176 7.947 2,62 IIIIEULMilli 0,60 27 17 2 47021,884 BB 124 - 10,536 0.64 20,00 ! UV :1*. ; . 2.57 065 26 90 2 62"7 21.654 7a 1,24 10.850 0.64 Tok,54 2:585 . 044 70 j 2,51 24.802 0,84 29.11 2J!5 22.017 1 t * 10,722 004 :lH — 2542 1:091 722.4? 24.418 0,94 28 64 2 843 2111124 T4 110 14.191S ELM ?..100 I 114 742 42 25.1}2S DJ34 2s.4D 2300 2320 7e tt7 1o_9ai OM 28.34 3.767 4 144 75234 25.229 7;d 1 15 10,987 0,63 2i9,210 2614 8.173 74233 26.427 0,63 - a Q '_1111122,413 BO 1 13 11,071 0.03 38.0.0 2812 8,104 50 x$61 mt ai 42;413 iitoe 2,872 22.,714 - 1.11 41.162 0.1➢'Z 25,94 2310;0,# 42 2.25 i7r;010. d.01 2+5.19+4 X029 22.981 1.00 11.232 Oil 4.245 ill 2.21 211! 9fl D62 26 811 4.907 23 X81 88 1 DT 11,214 0.0`2 25 70 1944Ii,2E11 4! - 2.18 26.175 062 26.70 3.021.1 43.131 491 1 OQ 116388 0.01 20,50 3 102 1,285 00 2.14 24.362 0.61 26 59 3 102 �3. QD 311 104 11.461 0.61 488.44 3169 0,.302 1t] 111 28.324 0,01 25.48 3.169 23.306 3Z1,02 11.124 4.01 28.31 3 217 6.318 n I S 2l 6' 4 0,�1 25.38 1217 - 7J.•rtl 141.91 1!1.9009.91 25.24 3 274 8.3' 7 94 2.04 20.13E9 0 e I 2b. 3 214 23.685 +R7 - , 90 11 675 0,6025.14 7.331 tS 344 BIB P.41 27 021 0,r}4 35.19 3 334 ,Z,1 016 91 . ; 11.745 D.60 25.11 LIDO8.355 mt8 '1q.t#is 27.141 4-6G 25.11 '�i •1119 ?.1_]'JZ , 100 ► ' • 11.812 0.00 25 02 3.448&3186 10fi 1, 21.331 b dtl �i� 013 3 44t 73.5Ei«4 102 MS 11,879 0.60 24.44 3.504 8.374 1D2 Ir411 V. 400. p,d 24 9# 3664 23.1}811 i0+f 01.94 11.9,3 U_db24 963_8161 11.3111 104 1.91] 71.640 Da 74138 3 S 24.079 11}9 t7 112 17007 D S924 7B3.819 145 1.10 17.13e 0,5P24 :78 3 s19 24,11111 101 6.9112.4270 Cr 6924,71 '.8 394 108 k 1.85 rJ@24.71 x_017$ 41277 114 I 819012131 0 hi' 7l +1 3 T !A 3611 110 1.13 0.54 24.64 3.133 24,34ns 117 0 a911142 OS:1.57 al 1131 14_01 112 1.10 0,602&57 3791 24.424 _ 114 0.89 12.211 N,S1 3148 d AOIa 114 1.78 2>EN.353 D.5Q 14 61 a-641 24,506 115 _ 4.87 12110 0 • : 24.44 3.400 6 004 116 1-711 26 414 a,S19 2+4 +i+f 3 900 ;84,683 T 119 0 ae 12207 DID 24.38 3 DM 5 404 11a 1.74 28 622b,5A 74,38 3 ! tai 24.73 124' �Q,� ¶1424 ► .: 2433 _ 4 421 8 403 1211 1.71 26�.7P,3 4.618 24,33 4<021 _ i?.2'' loo 018 '24.27 &f17tl 1.409 122 1.50 711,802 Oda 71 V 4,071 24 904 I 12_444 - - Magi. Flit: 4111011 310rsi1• r -MOO Mad. FAA Major Stomas Vol ilirr.e 00430 er kiwi . FM Minor 51o:ego Vofum. lecre-N.) • 6 4041 Mod. FAA Molar manage Volume laCta I . j r UEFCD Dt i tNTION BASIN VOLUME ESTIMATING WORKBOOK Version 2,35, Re lensed January 2018 7�' I flAS A 5-11-.18 LUD-0.ieniicn_DFVEtOPE0tihm, ModIlkd FAA 10040,1U 24 4041 3l larkbl8 CI -.DU )ut: blank 6/27/2( 645 ritet• earbievelopj. DETENTION VOLUME BY THE MODIFIED FAA METHOD Page 43 of J r r r p Project 723-1 REDBAR N a Nein ID: BASIN A DEVELOPED TO RELEASE AT 10 -YEAR HISTORIC RATE 35 30 25 20 2 15 10 5 Inflow and Outflow Volumes vsr Rainfall Duration - n - - ,.. --1. - -ex T-t-rrs,n• it.u-.! s .0 1'- aar=iialis ode , P els - - "--- t. _ ... i .• • . a • ip +� a_.. �-._ _ . _ -- _ , . is i 0 _ - — - f — - - , 0 [ ,. aa. .. . .,. a C/s�' ,{J�� JJ'' {A^j �`I 000 W�oO11.1"�' ,/ [�yJ yl o'L�co `/�� i.� ,y} ��`'�] Y00.0.0,�f0. l __et_ /� (ry1 _ 1/x.1 1 O- O ��y], ilI'00i. .CM1V 1, i7 -- —,ate cV 73, a a..�i �_ _ 2D 40 60 SO Duration (Minutes) 100 120 • =- MTNr %tin'MO cos Yohne - i* cr a trer9afl%V W tiauw O K1rrOr 3Or*r Sbrn#u Mo na ,-•iso Major 8bnn InflowYolurnri Amin HijorllLW' 8wPIwVMutni I UAW ;Kum lflnp Vet -arm 140 ()OECD DETENTION BASIN VOLUME ESTIMATING WORKBOOK Version 2,36, Releasab January 2015 723-1 RASINI A 3-11-14 t.iatield d vn_DEVELOPEDt.xism, Modified FAA ill WC 18. too AM )ut:blank 6/27/2( Page 44 of I kisini DETENTION VOLUME BY THE MODIFIED FAA METHOD z Project; 723-1 REDBARN Bosh ID: BASIN B DEVELOPED TO RELEASE AT 10 -YEAR HISTORIC RATE (For catchments less than 160 acres only. For larger catchments, use hydrogreph routing method! Oeiernilriallan of MINOR Detention Volume Using Modified FAA Method Determination of MAJOR Detention Volume Using Modified FAA Method Dos pet 4" ems! a I ; 17't.e:q. Ma ' Cate enenl drainage Irnpery$oucneac 1, a T&100 wean* Catchment Drainage Imperylonnesc I, = 70 00 petaarrl Calthmenl C3tains4e Ares A ■ 410 ,000 4P,41 Catchment Orelpepa An. A • $0.0 acmes Predirtslopmant MRCS Soli Gncup Type ' c A.B. C, of D Predaystopment MRCS Soil Group Type as C +rs'. 8, C, or 0 Rilum Peeled let Delsnllan Conlini T 10 yews (2, 5 10, 26, SO, or 108, comae_ Peilo41W I7lie!es:lion. Comm, T a I1G friers 12, 5, 10, 26, 50, ar 1001 Ttrnp.of Cements:044Th Of Weill IAed To = L mint.des Time of concentration of Watershed to a 14M rnirrtrla.t ,a newabletInit fildgeise IIele 4 4433 rridraaa, Allowable Una Retire+spa Roo q r 0.30 Oilmen €]ne••itour Preelp lalion P, L 1-35 .In Chat One -hour Predpttatistn Pt 'r , 284 Inches peslgn Reimer! Of Parmule I Si Cie P,/(1*T,)*Gil Design RelPfel110F Formula 1 a c1' Ptr'(C7+Tct'rct Coefficient €3ne C1 !' 213.60 Coefficlant One CI - 2.0.64 costaeienl Two C4 10 CaeMcf.eel T%st en ' 10 Coefficient. Three C.,4 • 0,7'4$ Coattltiant Thin CI ' 4759 a rime itilaw rfrlm the O.7niln Mg l —V' Yq1.4$c tdEgay_x rio l Li 1p,in..f' Aiy_ 118 toe j Runoff Coof ftdant Cm 1'04 - Runoff Cosnicien1 C a 471 Inflow Peak Auntie Qp-in ; 137,51 ors Inflow Peak I+tun.ott Qp-In = 319, ra cf; - Allaynible Peek Ouk'flaw RE. Qp-out ■ 24,00 eta Ailoweisle Peak Ovtlln*' Rene Op -out' 14,00 eta Mo+l.PM Miner Storage Volume • 2141366 cubit, Ise! — - Mad. FAA Mader Stardge Velum, is a- 621,4352 cubic fiat Mad. FAA MAO/ !tamp* '+hire d 14 278 sere-fi food, PAA minor Storage yethane no 4,637 acre -4 • * c. Eger ealntait gustier. Ine'Sn pat*I In many Vane is rags '6 for 5441 iulrtt* Ptattrfatl DWatkift minulet R4fnfall Intensity (riches t hr - : Infut1r Velum■ acrr~ree Wilk :. t .: I hdjMalmettl Factor "ran' . 4' •. I AYer.De Outflow ds OuMow Volume a te-itse4 (csillistk T_ SIorsgs V0W** eca-fret t t S.._ fteontall purallnn minutia %e d. Inlenllty Inehos RalNhrN i Ise out, ad InftlrW Volume area -feet ., t AdlUstnwnt Parlor 613° a • A44riO otatlinw sh ' ' C 4.4110Nr Votirr ■ a ciliate' a ' 5laPi+f a Volume act retaat • + 1 11.231.4011 L0tl 1.h 01)88 1.741 654 d-703 1..aSrO O4i �h.ri6 4 9-0!5 1.00 J 24.00 0 132 3,068 1 yea i,a9 .. 1.251 4 !8 96 4 321 4.00 R 0,2 0 198 4.,123 4 i 41 1.tt6D 74 • ■ O,WS 1660 1 i C,,;tt24 asr1 264 1. ti 11 4 i:at 24.00 0,254 4.566 ;02 _2,266 10 3.70 2409 i D0 24.30 O ; i 2270 ID 7 31 1039 1.00 24.00 0.331 8.7OI 12 6 ctrl B,722 IWO 2440 '_397 9.,335 12 3 ,43 2004 1 21130 0.097 2.505 14 6 SO a o.45J 9fi9 14 no 3,11+1 1;.00 24,110 Q 463 2..201 _A 10 Q_ ii} I.,666 1..00 7400 O. t1$Y•- 7,3fl 14 3Dt 30194 2.3486 18 204 3 402 Loo 21.00 a Sat 1W? 16 0.75 - LW_ 114 Ie.'#GQ� 1.741 24:1129 � 6..45 6.7'71 1.40 20 2.60 3.790 1.00 21,011 01,451 72 2-66 3.0t2 11.06 Lil!i _li494 i.2! 1, 6. iii, i n 0.06 .iii 8,694 Bi76 24 4$ 4,120 8.92 2l.bG 1727. 3 31)3 24 494 4.9313 4.00 ec 0.727 @,@09 24 4-72 0.670 Ole21 26 G 7230 4.1i� 75 714 ant area 1.607 28 - 2.23 4.403 _ _8,01 D 211 4,52 10.590 1.50_ 2t1.rrT p.793 9.301 313 114 4.531012 40.00 i 3 731 313 4,14 10A95 013 20.00 U -82S 47 659 4_10 10.162 D.Bti 19 60 9;110 9.902 32 20$ 4,860 01.60 7.41,99 4.763 4.78 19.00D 693 3,970 34 +1.03 11,012 0,70 19.00 stem 0.603 10 130 1.02 4 MIo.Te 18192 + 926 3 843 313 3,39 11;2ag 0,7'6 UM 10,-5435 3a1 as - loan 0.70 10,32 0:151 4,011J 38 3 74 I 11.602 - — 0.70 mac 6311: '10I54D , 40 3,tkl, I fan 4.76 - U1.013 CHI 1D 1'712 4a 611}+66 0 ?ra• fO.41D (1,7 1' F If 4P r _ 163 11.234 +6.74 12.71 1.025 10 810 +1,141 6 367 2.74 17.71 i.021 j 44 7 43 t1. 073. 0,?3. 11.46 1.OSi it DTI #i41.045,146 e,731.7, B 1 051 4,160!' rte 3 33 12.33.9 0.12 17.22 1 051 1 1,236. 1b11,04 6,18 92211r,a 1.091 4 335 41 ' 60 5.407 + + 1,124 4,983 I 41} 3,24 12313 0.71 17r,t30 1.124 i i,35a 5D 3.1912691 a.7t7 18:89 i .1 11.634 66 i.6tlt 5.4834 030 16,60 IAIT 4,327 52 1 625,657 Lag 18,67190 4 347 62 1.4712.@31 6.69 ie. 1-11 ti 671 3,0013 021 0>aJ9 16.E 1. 3 11 612 _ 54 1 42 6426 0,02 10,44 122J4 405 a9 I1 141 + OD 1028 1.2.50 +1 441 59t.0313 rz 0,56 ie.Z0 1 12 0 _ r1 921H 56 1,415.743 OI.417 11l.h+4 1{3Mg= li5.alt Q+3T 11!4 1.264 I. G•i1 Grit X30 61 d1�8 0 67 1 1+321 1.7_ 107 80 1 38 b.AT 15 It10 !.• 4 551 1355 12273 .i5 S,t'119 a,+ 1b,1i 4, 2.6311 d l 1.3r1 1,940 0':40 15,71 1 389 rf 608 04 7}7 I'k Ti1•i 1.5 r* 16.75 1.386 12 076 s 2s a 01)? o da 1614 1.421. 4.505 64 2 17 pot ad 4S 1B a+i 1.x+42112.480 9e 12e 0,D4i3 815 16..63 1,465 4 eug 66 267 11..x32 0 05 16.55 1.465 70 1.21 4:119 ait4 16.43 1 430 4,531 74 F. 61 14.1 064 16 43 1.463312 672 72 217 14.983 030+4 125 33 1.62112.142 12 1,#2 6471 164 1623 1.621 4A51 _ ra 2 42 14403 1 004 15 2�1 1.664 12.849 7+4 I.1`� 8,221 4 54 16 24 I 554 Oa 74 1.17 t3.2T�1 483 16.10 1,687 4.$67 S Z 14,tr j 4.03 11216 t_dS7 i2033 >!6 }! titrt , 4 113, ruG+f[5 mots 1 16 15.Tf3 X43 t6,Q0 1.6211 4,104 r 1 13 ad.3•Ia 4it13 1 .9Q i 461 1.119 1.W 2 20 1; ► p' t, oo r rt5a non 5 13 169 i 1 S A.4.t0 (h.134' 1+4, 9a i. 4.733 94 2 21 i+1. 3#61 1.3„d2 14.86 {.714 13 242 I +1! C, ,469 0,62 14!86 i 314 4.746 8Q 2,1g 16 !ba36 O:1. 1+1.30 +,762 13,313 l .OT 0.509 D.6a2 14.74 1.152 4,763 III 4.744 9'9 214 l6. al$e U,a 1 14 -13 ti, 785 13 3i51 'r 1. 6.500 0Ati 34.17 1.81E 4176 90 .7..11 152Ott 041 i+l.5T i 81s 13440 1,03 t,a43fi 0:51 i4 331 1 651 4307 92 4.OBI i6.3t33 Gil 14.81 BS t 43 512 13.614 04 1.D1 6,884 0 ts1 14.65 1.194 4l 793 90 • ca 13.720 0 b4 14 5d 1.91 T 4,103 11 335 116 0,08 4.751► a, 14 46 1 P 4 109 —.. 11601 100 t t: • ' 0, - — ;.416 1t1ad O�SP6 lla.rr d.1sd x4.40. 1':QA313.7516 af. •j _.. _. .__.-_-_._._ .. - 114.33 _........_ 2.017 13 : DI 102 C 95 - DSM.� la sV,�.'..E 1+4,3.4. Yal1 .' ₹01.? .` l Mai Mil 4421.1 104 040 1111 i.3Fti d6.9t71 tt.80 14.31 2.060 13.968 1.00 16.593 a 631 14,2b1 toad 13 910 106 wt a_a1t}0 Se 14,25 ZOO3 4.82a1 1x85 14 67$ 159 14,22 1.1 t4 13,961 101 fi 4i 6.947 r 5' iili 22 2116 4.831105 1121 133 1816ie 0.69 14.18 2.149 14-x10 110 0230 16 08$ r 69 14.18 2 145 4433 112 0.89 7.01 f 0,573 14,14 21524 eas 1121.50 ib,?39 &. O 14.14 1932 144.357 114 Da6e 1.11151 4,69 14,11 22164.8$0 1141.79 15.319 a 6'9 1+7.11 1.216 14.103 1151.70 iQ,398 469 14.07 1240 14.144 111 0.8I 7,085 11.69 1+4.47 2.2484,837 119 0.59 7.118 0.168 14.03 2.281 4 837 110 1.74 16.473 0.58 14.03 L211 14 192 126 Milai= 16.510 0.66 i 14 00 Z314 14 23. 124 0.84 7.161 0.69 14.00 2 314 I 4 838 172 1.69 - _ 1.5523 a 6e 12:$7` 7;347 141.x'10 In ag3 1. iiD Q.S$ 131 Pig ° z341 4 ,ax} -- -• Mart. FAA !Minn' Storage ` inliimstceirrn f'!,1 b 210.44 S mod. iriA MAIM fsu012 0,1 ■ Mod. FM Minor Storage Volume (aorta) a 4.53691 Mod, FAA PA star Storage Vo$uma (acre -Ito mo UOFCD DETENTION BASIN VOLUME ESTIMA f iNG WORKBOOK Version 2.35, Released January 21)15 723- 9AEIN 0 3-15-I8 uD-LIPIPntion_DEVELOPED xlcm Ma,dired it=AA 14.276$ 311312015e 1312 01 5, 0;00 AM " )pit: blank 6/27/2( 1 a s-ilrlwa Win!•« _ _ ___ _ T><. >�.�0%4N b saw __ .ov4 DETENTION VOLUME BY THE MODIFIED FM METHOD Page 45 of i i P ro jest: 723.1 REDBARN Bash ID; BASIN B DEVELOPED To RELEASE AT 104Y'EAR HISTORIC RATE Volume (acre-feet) 18 16 14 12 10 B 6 4 2 Inflow and Outflow Volumes vs. Rainfall Duration H i—i r- - - . — Y ♦ - .mss a -- - -- -- - - - - - - . • I s+ _. - t._ J tIII Jt :_ . _ y- - 1 _ i4._. .. . I - - - 0i- . . a 0 • a • -• a • 1 i l- I. Y t- 1 !• l a .3 Y L Y 1 L S. l S _ l t 1 a, .. -- -•a a - a .1 000 0000 0, r r a ['�.�i yrL a 60 tia"CM-C 0 0000000,0 IS. 00 _ r OO hel to •.r. �� Y f1 -- ib a .,, .., f4,� 4j a - - i 20 40 60 @0 Duration (Minutes) Ub r iwM leiewlYok t.-.t--Ninar dharm °Vinci Wu 'Linn 100 120 o 14anni !tame flans Val attain Qum lnilaw Volume—+—Id$$or Stan DadiewWaft. b Kohn Muni limp Yahoo 140 U©FCD DETENTION BASIN VOLUME ESTIMATING WORKBOOK Version 2.35, Released January 2016 733-1 MSP .' $ 3-11-14 LID-©o14nt)ocl_DEVEtOPE4 xl>arn1 vita dtiid FAA 3/13/243111, 9:,Q5 1+141 nut: blank 6/2 7/21 1345 (kJ edD Lit de It ircil Page 46 of f r Project 723-1 REOBARN DETENTION VOLUME BY THE MODIFIED FAA METHOD Bashi 1D; 1Am C DEVELOPED TO RELEASE AT 'la -YEAR HISTORIC RATE (For catchments less then ' 60 acres only. Far Target' catchments, use hydragraph rooting m8 1Q Delentlnatlon of MINOR Detention Volume Using Modified FAA Method Delarnalnallnn of MAJOR Detention Volume (lain! Modified FM Molhod p! I fo r 1 .. t 1t 1 Min tin Inrt011rrn gart.ball Catchinent Drainage ImpeMausnese I. ise_OB pram tit Cetchm+en1 Mainrrge Imperviausnsn Ii* = 88.00 patent Catehmanl Oratrloge Mee A ; 1,-.1.33-0 - woo N weltttimorrt 0rsinegaAre. 4 a 17_434 awes Prodan1opment MRCS Soil Group Type = C A B, C, or D Predevetapment MRCS Sall Group) Type C A 13, C, or 0 Return Period tar Deleettan Control T IC yrs is (2, 5, 10, 25, 30, or 160) Reno Period for Detention Control T 4�IOU p., 8, 10, 26, 50, or teen Time ii Ccncenlratlorr of Watershed To = 3!D mlimaits Tim. of Concentration of Welerehed To * mfrioloa Allowable Unit Releases Rata q claimers Movable lhnit Relent Rate q Q 1 ' L serf+! One -hour Pr.clpltallon Pq 148 UKhitt Oneahou► Preelpttatlon Pi 4 2 20 *het Design Rainfall tOF Fermin! I "C r• teat icebTcl' el Design .Milnfal% !DP FQrmufa I - CI' P F(Cj+T, re) toeMconl Ono C, Y 228.50} Coefficient One C, -, 4354 Coemcler!t T',w C-i ' 1Q i CbeMien' Two Ci e' 18 Cooletlent mime t `r 0/89 Coefficient Three Qi C 0.719 --."'r _.�. �alr gt natty ;if art A±wurua iacnu4rr-uin l jjpj .r i '1Mjii!l. lr �� i ± r'.il w sr l It &vs ., = , _ r : RunaR Coefficient C = —4 36 _ I Runoff Coefficient C = 10.87 Inflow Peak Runoff Qp-In = 24.83 ;hi " I Inflow Peek Runoff Op-Th a 85,13 cis Allowable Peak Outflow R ale ©p-au1 a — 5135 di AJrav,-able Peak Outflow Rule cip-cut = 6.36 ate Mod. FAA Miner stomp Vlr4ume ot 38,497 cubic !eel F Mod. FAA Major 3forage Volume ■ 126,331 cubits feat mad, FAA Molnar Storage Volume = 0,2114acra4ft Mod. FM Major 81011411Wums ■ 2.S?7 scrr-1t 1 2 I' Enter Rit x111 Duration Tine' aria( Minas* VttueM to of , S tor-5-I~tlnutsil - - _ Rainhll Puratlan minutes lialiug Intensity Inches Rainfall i 1 hr {511 01 aerwritat Inflow Volume E ft A►d]tietmrtnt Fect*r 'm' 4o % Avelege Outflow as toldooti Outflow Volume am -.•fiat talitaldti acre!-faai itlutbut1 9lerage Volume RalnteEI Inlensstp Inefl ! tw 01111044, InCiarw Volume aera•feall tom* Adluiltnerti Foetal 'rn" ., Outflow ale €}utjioso Volume oct+r-feet . , ;s Storage Volume aue~(eril ;.� Rainfall Duration, minutes itc411111 2 5,61 0162 '1.G0 61.)5 1015 {Ii130 2 _ 11-3 a-374 110 4.35 0.916 8701-5 1_00 5A5 0029 9 0 626 4 4.90 04270 1. 5.13 0.029 0 240 4 1.00 5.36 0 544 01840 a 4 41 0 364 1.00 6,35 0.044 0 3'2D 6 1 4.02 a+442 110 0,31 5.089 aim t3 Q ie I,o74 01 5,06 0033 (,016 10 t 70 9t W , 1 d. -36 ! 0.074 0.4 6 107 al 1.23s 1.00 0,074 1.10 12 1 11,00 LI- 0414. �01.I1a4 0:96 1,375 1.11 I 535 0.138 1.267 1.492 1 00 I 5.3115 0 1D3 1.346 14 3.2f3� 8 d1 1 ',_ 11.103 1+1. 1 3 {tt IAN • + - 1.00 1E 0.35 0.115 1.480 16 I 2_t1+t U_7'02 110 3.35 D. 1713 'Q.114"Fd 18! MO 1.1851.04 _5,36 l 20 299 '0.73'1 6.45 5.36.1.841 4.'.73 22 ' 5'1',18 i,6?�` 040#5,11tl.ib61321 Z43 5.1104 0.19'! 24 44 J 4.00 0_1!12 0441 4.041,951 092 4,90 01021 709 26 #.73 0.169 1 451 "fl 3 33 0.83E 4 81 4.13 0.109 4 9 4 722.020 b a 28 2 0.959 2 t3bd O BR 0 177 = 1 NI I 241 '6,.184 4.1#6 413 4a415 0.11+1 1,951 - -2.06 ttitti 1 # 35 G_t .:iU. 4.162301 0 I a - 01n 2.ow 34 1:(14 11,1 1 #t013 2.265 0.70 4.25 0.109 2r8;a1 1.12 4040' 0.71 4.'18 0. 0.14330 ilia, 130' a.7Q - 0.201 2.090 30 _ SA >4 1.A$ 0:909 6:76 COI 012K 2130 404 isla 441 r C1.7� :.+ ' 3100 a dh 4441 .0 .221 2.'177 41 11741.00 i 9.06 + 111+11 {i 74 3.15 0225 2213 4,77742z,6 1.80 ..073 0.1"e 3,19 2462 073 3.19 i i1.731IS 22+17 + 4,797443.42 4b 1,1 1 1:039 0.72 3.84 0.2+13 4.TBt}463.33 2.622 fl 72 3 d4 O 2 3 2279 4b 1„d[1 +1.iri ANQ.3Ei1 4b01t J.24 1-1tiu 0171 s,7O I�.fb1 �.3t!!li * 1.6,0 1- • On 3.74 2U 0.112 • r 0.10 2.5 6 9.70 3.,74 01261. 2. 39 t 5z• — 0 255 0 818 387 2,621 — 4149 3..70 t�.?46 Z30i 1 Q l3�76 2ER4 4J -8g ti r11 1.Iri1911 t}.Eia 3-.�1 01 a4Qft 3 87 4.273 Z 31.2 Za�� a,ss 0.21. 504 t � a:ea a, ea 417 0107 0-1536 68 .615 7 4 #+,47 3'08 0 $7 7 441 84 t.]DI 1.l� 0.47 3 ba 8;205 0044 ! ?_7iY 'L75r3 D187 �,5T D °�+JIi5 2.4114 1136 1.148 Itib 0.64 0302 I 4.148 I 62Z.73 278$ o.58 ],54 10:.302 2+188 !, 3'I f! 009 2,507 i#4 11x2 l tt94 0158 3 b1 0.'309 0.101 94 2 97 2 91s 6 tad 3.44 0,317 0,696 2 2 2. fs44 t5 -0f5 3.1114 D,317 2627 i.Pa 1.171 a OS 66 413 I.0 128 1.182 D.15 3.�t9 0,324 4861 ee 2-67 2.870 0.45 2,40 3.321 2.S#4 p t. 1, t,e7 fJ,84 3 qi 0.332 ti.11 70 1_ 01.332 2.6 9 5,339 ihl l Tr 2:+47 3.! 4 0i 3.44 tS 33D - 1563 ra 1,10 a 214 Oipa 3.4A 0340 irk 2#7 3.40 0.3#8 28D0 2.948 r : 0.354 4..87'17 76 2.35 Z87G (1033.3e U_314 2t51T T aA 1 16 1,f35atm3,36 tam 0172 isg 91; 0,033. FF r t11M+ 86 I, C5 i 243 033 7.34 0 302 0174 2;2f3 3.018 063 43111 0,� 2:'[iia 92 1 11 1,252 8.132 3.333 0.374 0.87'4 12 x.26 3.438 0,52 3.33 4 ale 4.66'3 3 060 + . B+4 t tl9 S tat 812 3.31 0_B3 , 01170 14 241 3.31 4 368 2877 3 022 a,a 3$ 101 t 260 a• a.aa5,320 DB2A! 3,30 0.3110 G�1 0,578 09 108 i 2?B f di 3.365,308 0,890 se9 tai 3,102 0.91 3.20 0,301 2.705 8D 1,04 1 286 0,,61 3, rD455 5,161 9+e9re 3 123 0.81 3.27 0 455 2718 1.02 i, I 0.95 020 It 187 2 DI 3 143 0111 3,26 0 413 - 2730 041 1.41 1 916. 3 34 0.963 !af1.04 1162 f161 n4 0.420 2.44 tee i3 a 441 8 313 a +2t 2,754 eAm 6.484 OR 5.41 3: 8 04 3 4#9 -tat 00 3.21 D442 0,81141 100 t 3."18 ®,604 3.7y I6.� 7':77'0 4011 1,3�v9 0.40 1 a X95 1,333 Q.Qa 3<20 _ r 01134 1:03 3.2316 OJab J 0. 1 Q 911 1.344 060 3.19 0.461 0 864 104 1,90 3 254 0,60 3 19 Q;4572797 106 Q 92 1.548 0 59 3 ib 0 +19A 4,800 106i Ai3.271 0.61 1.-1d 1 2.907 1e8 0,91 1.355 gag 317 0''472 0103 1011 BO3.219 Ip,5g 3.11 2.a17 t 110 0.ely 1,382 0,!50 0 #71 4 Bel 110 z.3a6 tI P — 3 1@ tin 0.479 4.aZ+1 112 4.69 ti.31a$ 0.69 3-16 0456 4,3182 1.51 3.322 4.58 3.16 0.488 2135 114 0 !!d 1,375 tit 3 td 0'494 0 581 11+1i 3.338 (] :9 3.14 0.49# 1844 SI 1115 0.81 ._382 029 3.1k 0 661 0 891 114ft.ts 3,361 0.68 3.14 D.541 2 913 Its 4-A! Os 3.13 G 101 (MO 110 1.74 3.370 0.58 3.13 0.£09 2881 1.71 0.1.14 011791 -- 1120 0 8.4 14104 0.18 3.12 120 3.315 _ 0,22 3.12 15,616 2848 122 III a 523 N 7",617 {3,43 1.401 ilia! . 3M _4 5_23 0172_ - 1: 1 _ .iii 3:+11 1 fie Mod, MA Miner Sterne Votury u (ell is 11-6 - *407 Mot FM Maim Storage VO1111119 (cubic Ill Mod, FAA Minus $t0regs Volume (ecr.'nl) 01,11!31 Mod. FAA Melor Slorigc Velum* (rich -it) • 287'7:2 UDFUO DETENTION BASIN VOLUME ESTIMATING WORKBOOK Version 2:35, Released January 2015 723-1 BASIN C 1-I1-18 UD`Oeleit ton 4JEVELQPED xisrn, Modified FAA 125,231 311312018. 9:10 AM )Ut: blank 6/27/2( Page 47 of i i 11 ESA& i1/44),„? DETENTION VOLUME BY THE MODIFIED FAA METHOD i Project: 723-1 REDBARN Basin ID: BASIN C DEVELOPED TO RELEASE AT 10 -YEAR HISTORIC RATE 4 3.5 2 CI 13 0,5 Inflow and Outflow Volumes vs. Rainfall Duration S S -ern . i • —s---- - - -- 4 • ma- ...•_.• eboo000t. 000 000 QO0000O 1000000000 00000000000 aO1jci t, r 20 40 60 80 Duration (Minutes) 100 120 140 at Miner Mann In IlinV Vs rwr wart Um" SWIM OwMlere Yairafr ID Mbar Alin a4rron Whim -+-• llia$v Morn INFaw Yoking -I-erMyai Stan* O MMus Valens ' MON SAMM INPI P UOFCD DETENTION BASIN VOLUME ESTIMATING WORKBOOK Version 2,354 Released January 2015 723'1 BASIN 03-11-1R UD-Detenton DE5IELOPE0.,d.m, MadIflrd FAA 3/1 a12016, 9'10 AM aut. blank 6/27/2( Page 48 of Pond A Callas Pond Sizing RED BARN POND JN: 723-1 3/13/2018 _ VOLUME AVAILABLE -Pond A Elevation 1 h Atop Abonom;and 4 1 Side lNotes ft sf sf of Matt Slopes I - - 0 t 100 - - _ bottom of pond 1 1 100I000 100 34,077 0.78 3:1 on all sides 2 -3 1 485,209 a 100,000 26b1810 6.10 l3:1 on all sides 10 R 'ABEL 1 496I239 I 4851209 485,807 11 15 13:1 on all sides 4 1 507,370 i 496,239 496,776 11.40 3:1 on all sides 1OOYR WSEL 5 1 817, 388 1507, 370 507,247 11.64 3:1 on all sides I total Vol. '1,789,718 41.09 freeboard at 4,46 4:1 imax size w/ 1' of freeboard to street 120 MINUTE DETERMINE 100_YR k.A.ISEL BY LMTFPPfI AT1nN VOL RE i` (10 yr) 24.734 1 AC -FT . _ 1,077,413 y cu, ft VOL REO (10-yr) 6.403 , AC -FT = 388,038 _ cu. ft 100 -YEAR WSEL CALO p 10 -YEAR WSEL CALC ELEV: VOLUME ELEV: VOLUME 785,693 2 299,886 3 11077,413 3.23 - -WSEL 10air 366,035 3A6 co EL AT 100.-YR 1 252 469 . 785,693 723-1 NEW BI N DETE NCTI N _pond 3-13-1 . Is n it:blank 6/27/2( Page 49 of Pond B Caics Pond Sizing RED BARN POND B JN: 723-1 3/13/2018 VOLUME AVAILABLEPond B Elevation _top Abottom Vpm,d Side Notes ft sf sf of ` Ac -ft Slopes ip 0 - i bottom of pond 1 1 1,000 - 330 0.01 8.1 on all sides 2 '1 154,321 1,000 55,855 1.27 8:1 on all sides 3 1 160,710 154,321 155,930 3.58 3: 1 on all sides IIOYRWSEL . 4 1 167,198 1 160,710 182,;304 3.73 3:1 on all sides 5 1 173,878 167,198 168,822 3.88 3:1 on all sides 100YR MEL z 1 180,478 173,878 175,396 _ 4.03 3:1 on all sides _ 7 1 187,208 180,476 182,024 4.18 3:1 on all sides total Vol. 900,161 20.66 ifreeboard at I 6.28 4:1 max size wi I' of freeboard to street DETERMINE 100-YR WSEL BY INTERPOLATION VOL R E+ ' (100-yr) T 14.234 AC -FT I = 620,033 ; cu, ft L RE ' X10-yr) 4.836 AC -FT = 210 $56 cu. 100 -YEAR WSEL CALC 10 -YEAR WSEL CALL ELE `: ii . VOLUME I ELEV: VOLUME 5 542,741 3 211,615 5,28 --WSEL AT 100-YR 620,033 3.TT--WSEL 10 -VP 210,856 718 1371 4 ' 373,919 723-1 N E'' _B I N&D ETENTI O _pond 13 18.x1 )gut: blank 6/27/2( Pond C Cates Pond Sizing RED BARN POND A: 723-1 Page 50 of 3/13/2018 OLU E AIL IELEiPond Elevation 4 p �� c��, pond Side Notes T • . k sf I sf I cf ; Ac -ft Slopes r 0 1 - j - j k bottom of pond _ 1 11000 - 330 +x,01 3.1 on ail sides _ l 2 1 i 20,550 1,000 8,608 0.20 3:1 on all sides p 3 1 27,480 20,550 23,892 0.54 3:1 on all sides 10 R WSEL 4 1 34,474 2,.480 30,802 0.70 3:1 on all sides 1 55,836 34A74 44,281 1.02 3:1 on all sides I OOYR WSEL _ __ 6 1 55,836 55,-36 55,278 1.27 3:1 on all sides 1 • 55,836 55,836 55,278 A1.. 7 3:1 on all sides 55,836 55,278 1.27 3:1 on all sides total Vol. S 273,345 t 5.01 i freeboard at G,M I I 4:1 max size wl V of freeboard to street 1 �_ DETERMINE 100-YRA WSEL BY INTERPOLATION: VOL R E ' (10`0- ) 2.877 AC FT _-- 125, 322 cu. ft - .. VOL R EO' D (l0-yr) 0.884 AC -FT = 38,507 cu. ft - -�--�-- 1 1O0 -YEAR WSEL CALL r - 10 -YEAR WSEL CALL ELEV: VOLUME ELEV: I VOLUME I 5 1�, 51 3 0 32,630 r 5444I fogiAlSE AT 100-YR 125,32 3,x'9 <--FUSEL 38,507 162 790 4 63232 1 723-1 NEW _E A IM DETENTION._pond 3-13-18.xls )ut:blank LJ')7/71 Page 1 c WELD COUNTY COLORADO LAND RECORDS AFFIDAVIT OF INTERESTED LAND OWNERS SURFACE ESTATE 5/25/2018 11:51:21 AM THE UNDERSIGNED, States that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names, addresses, and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners of the property (the surface estate) within 500 feet of the property being considered. This list was compiled utilizing the records of the Weld County Assessor avaitable on the Weld County Internet Mapping site, http://www.co.weld.co.us, and has not been modified from the original. The list compiled for the records of the Weld County Assessor was assembled within thirty days of the applications submission date. Signature Date Property Owners Within 300 ft of Parcel # 120724100046 Account Parcel Owner Mailing Address R0281387 12071 3000027 UNITED POWER I N C PO BRIGHTON, BOX 929 CO 806010929 R0281487 120713000076 PUBLIC el SERVICE CO OF COLD TAX PO DENVER, SERVICE BOX 1979 CO 802011979 DEPARTMENT 81028602 120724000004 BENSON FARMS LIMITED LIABILITY CIO 530 FORT BILL HOLYOKE COLLINS, WOODS ST CO 805257022 CO 81024902 120724000005 RBM HOLDINGS LLC PO BOX LONGMONT, 675 CO 805020675 R1025202 120724000008 POST ROCK LLC C/O CHRISTOPHER 13600 COUNTY L0NGMONT, CO ROAD 805049656 J WAGNER 11 R8948319 120724100041 COPPER HOMES LIMITED 12656 WATERSIDE LONGMONT, CO LN 805045252 R8948320 120724100042 COPPER HOMES LIMITED 12656 LONGMONT WATERSIDE CO 805045252 LN R8949978 120724100043 CANTU DIANA 'R8949978 120724100043 1 CANTU DANNY a 5492 LONGMONT COUNTY ROAD CO 805049665 32 Parcels: 18 Owner Records: 20 Page 1 of 4 nut:h[ank 6/27/2( Page 2 c WELD COUNTY COLORADO LAND RECORDS AFFIDAVIT OF INTERESTED LAND OWNERS SURFACE ESTATE 5/25/2018 11:51:21 AM THE UNDERSIGNED, States that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names, addresses, and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners of the property (the surface estate) within 500 feet of the property being considered This list was compiled utilizing the records of the Weld County Assessor available on the Weld County Internet Mapping site, http://www.co.weld.co.us, and has not been modified from the original. The list compiled for the records of the Weld County Assessor was assembled within thirty days of the applications submission date, Signature Date Property Owners Within 300 ft of Parcel 4 1 207241 00046 Account Parcel Owner Mailing Address 88949979 120724100044 C_HEC_KETTS . i- ERR YI I R8949979 120724100044 CHECKETTS COLTON 16212 MEAD, GINGER CO 805426018 AVE R8949980 120724100045 COPPER HOMES LIMITED 12620 LONGMONT, WATERSIDE CO 80504 LANE R8949981 120724100046 13-32 DEVELOPMENT LLC 1351 BOULDER, RED ASH CO LN 803039547 R8949339 120724200018 RAM LAND CO LLC - _ 103 BLUE MEAD, CO HERON 805428803 CT 8895/853 120724400021 13-32 DEVELOPMENT LLC 1351 BOULDER, RED ASH CO LN 803039547 81030602 120918000018 SEKICH PROPERTIES LLC 6769 PLATTEJILLE, COUNTY ROAD CO 806519000 32 R8072900 120919000052 1I EBE ER ELIZABETH P 14514 PLATTEVILLE, COUNTY ROAD CO 806519013 13 R4789207 120919200001 SEKICH RODNEY A PO BOX 309 MEAD, CO 805420309 Parcels: 18 Owner Records: 20 Page 2of4 )ut: Mark 6/27/2( Page 3a WELD COUNTY COLORADO LAND RECORDS AFFIDAVIT OF INTERESTED LAND OWNERS SURFACE ESTATE 5/25/2018 11:51:21 AM THE UNDERSIGNED, States that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names, addresses, and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners of the property (the surface estate) within 500 feet of the property being considered. This list was compiled utilizing the records of the Weld County Assessor available on the Weld County Internet Mapping site, http://www.co.weld.co.us, and has not been modified from the original. The list compiled for the records of the Weld County Assessor was assembled within thirty days of the applications submission date. Signature Date Property Owners Within 300 ft of Parcel # 120724100046 Account Parcel , Owner I Mailing Address R4789307 120919200002 FREDON LLC PD MEAD, BOX 443 CO 805420443 R0062088 120919200002 WESTERN SUGAR COOPERATIVE 7555 E HAMPDEN Co 802314800 AVE STE 520 Parcels: 18 Owner Records: 20 Page 3 of 4 )ut:blarrk 6/''27/ Pager, WELD COUNTY COLORADO LAND RECORDS AFFIDAVIT OF INTERESTED LAND OWNERS SURFACE ESTATE 5/25/2018 11:51:21 AM THE UNDERSIGNED, States that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names! addresses, and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners of the property (the surface estate) within 500 feet of the property being considered, This list was compiled utilizing the records of the Weld County Assessor available on the Weld County Internet Mapping site, http://w w.co.weld,co,us, and has not been modified from the original. The list compiled for the records of the Weld County Assessor was assembled within thirty days of the applications submission date. Property Owners Within 300 ft of Parcel # 120724100046 Parcels. 18 Owner Records: 20 Signature Date Page 4 of 4 )ut.blarlk 6/27/?.( Page 1 c MINERAL RIGHTS AFFIDAVIT March 14, 2018 13-32 Development, LLC does not own any of the mineral rights or water rights relative to the Red Barn property. Anadarko is the leaseholder and operator for mineral rights production. We have been in touch with Anadarko regarding the concept plan and they do not have any objections at this time. We are in the process of obtaining a formal mineral rights search and will provide that within two weeks. The contact person is: Katherine Ross Landman Kerr-McGee Oil & Gas Onshore LP, A subsidiary of Anadarko Petroleum Corporation 1099 18th Street, Suite 1800 Denver, CO 80202 Office: 720-929-6671 Cell: 970-443-2905 Andrew Batson Project Manager, 13-32 Development LLC )ut:Marl. 6/27/2( Hello