The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20182155.tiffPage 1 0 1;4 REFERRAL REQUEST TODAY'S DATE: June 27, 2018 PROJECT NAME: PROJECT FILE NO: PROJECT TYPE: INITIAL COMMENTS DUE BY: FINAL COMMENTS DUE BY: The Highlands 2018-07 Annexation, Zoning Amendment, PUD July 10, 2018 PLANNING CONTACT Pam Gehringer EMAIL: pgehringer@townofinead.org Dear Referral Organization or Agency: Information on the proposal in the Town of Mead referenced above is enclosed for your review and comments. ❑ We have no objections to this proposal ❑ Please note the following concerns this organization has with this proposal: El See attached letter for comments regarding this proposal. Organization or Agency Name Your Name Signature Date Phone For additional information. °lease contact: Planning Director Chris Kennedy. AICP at 970-805-4192 ?mini is Ikeine.4J 0?- f (0-/8 )ut:blank PLEASE RETURN TO: Town Of Mead Pam Gehringer 441 3rd Street PO Box 626 Mead, Colorado 80542 paehrinder a@townofinead.orq c.c.: so c RS) , PL,C(»m/ TP), cmc Cnw/ m m / TPi, PcorEPIC HIER) craps 01-10-Lg 2018-2155 6/29/2( Page 1 0 THE HIGHLANDS PETITION FOR ANNEXATION OF UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY OF THE COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO, TO THE TOWN OF MEAD STATE OF COLORADO TO: THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF MEAD, COLORADO The undersigned in accordance with the Municipal Annexation Act of 1965, Chapter 31, Article 12, C.R.S., 1973 as amended, hereby petitions the Board of Trustees for annexation to the Town of Mead, Colorado of the following described unincorporated territory located in the County of Weld and State of Colorado, to wit: See Exhibit A — Legal Description In support of said Petition, your Petitioner alleges that: 1. It is desirable and necessary that the territory described above be annexed to the Town of Mead. 2. The requirements of C.R.S. sections 31 -12-104 and 31-12-105, as amended, exist or have been met in that: a. Not less than one -sixth of the perimeter of the area proposed to be annexed is contiguous with the Town of Mead or will be contiguous with the Town of Mead within such time as required by 31-12-104. A community of interest exists between the area proposed to be annexed and the Town of Mead. c. The area proposed to be annexed is urban or will be urbanized in the near future. The area proposed to be annexed is integrated with or is capable of being integrated with the Town of Mead. e. No land within the boundary of the territory proposed to be annexed which is held in identical ownership, whether consisting of one tact or parcel of real estate or two or more contiguous tracts or parcels of real estate, has been divided into separate parts or parcels without the written consent of the landowner or landowner s thereof, unless such tracts or parcels were separated by a dedicated street, road or other public way. Page 1 of 5 )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 2 c No land within the boundary of the area proposed to be annexed which is held in identical ownership, comprises twenty acres or more, and which, together with the buildings and improvements situated thereon has an assessed value in excess of two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000.00) for ad valorem tax purposes for the year next preceding the annexation, has been included within the area proposed to be annexed without the written consent of the landowner or landowners. g. No annexation proceedings have been commended by another municipality for the annexation of a part or all of the area proposed herein to be annexed the Town of Mead. h. The annexation of the territory proposed to be annexed will not result in the detachment of area from any school district. i. The territory proposed to be annexed will not have the effect of extending the boundary of the Town of Mead more than three miles in any direction from any point of the boundary of the Town of Mead in anyone year. Prior to completion of the annexation of the territory proposed to be annexed, the Town of Mead shall have in place a plan for that area, which generally describes the proposed: Location, character, and extent of streets, subways, bridges, waterways, waterfronts, parkways, playgrounds, squares, parks, aviation fields, other public ways, grounds, open spaces, public utilities, and terminals for water, light, sanitation, transportation, and power to be provided by the Town of Mead; and the proposed land uses for the area; such plan to be updated at least once annually. k. In establishing the boundary of the territory proposed to be annexed, if a portion of a platted street or alley is to be annexed, the entire width of the street or alley has been included within the territory to be annexed. The Town of Mead will not deny reasonable access to any landowners, owners of any easement, or the owners of any franchise adjoining any platted street or alley which is to be annexed to the Town of Mead but is not bounded on both sides by the Town of Mead. 3. The owners of 100% percent of the area proposed to be annexed, exclusive of dedicated streets and alleys, have signed this petition and hereby petition for annexation of such territory 4. Accompanying this petition are four copies of an annexation map containing the information following Page 2 of 5 nut:blank 6/29/2( Page 3 c a. A written legal description of the boundaries of the area proposed to be annexed; b. A map showing the boundary, or the area proposed to be annexed, said map prepared and containing the seal of a registered engineer; c. Within the annexation boundary map, a showing of the location of each ownership tract in unpiatted land and, if part or all of the area is platted, the boundaries and the plat numbers of plots or of lots and blocks; d. Next to the boundary of the area proposed to be annexed, a drawing of the contiguous boundary of the Town of Mead and the contiguous boundary of any other municipality abutting the area proposed to be annexed, and a showing of the dimensions of such contiguous boundaries. 5. Upon the Annexation Ordinance becoming effective, all lands within the area proposed to be annexed will become subject to all ordinances, rules and regulations of the Town of Mead, except for general property taxes of the Town of Mead which shall become effective as the January 1 next ensuing. 6. The zoning classifications (land use) requested for the area proposed to be annexed is Residential Single Family-4(RSF-4) PUD. Page 3 of 5 nut:blank 6/29/2( Page 4 0 WHEREFORE, the following petitioner respectfully requests that the Town of Mead, acting through its Board of Trustees, approve the annexation of the area proposed to be annexed. By this acknowledgment, the undersigned hereby certify that the above information is complete and true. (If the applicant is not the owner(s) of the subject property, the owner(s), mortgage and/or lienholder shall also sign the application). Applicant/Petitioner: The Stella S. Gal/egos Family Trust and Richard Romeo, Personal Representative of the Estate of Pete Gal/egos, a/so known as Perfecto Gallegos, Deceased Applicant: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day ofJL�.!'1Q 201e by Richard E. Romeo, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Pete Gallegos, also known as Perfecto Gallegos, Deceased, and as Trustee of the Stella S. Gallegos Family Trust as Applicant. Witness My hand and official seal. My corn ssion expires i_Zc U• IC STATE OF COLORADO } } 55. COUNTY OF ,} Page, 4of5 LEIGH TEICHMAN NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID 20144040910 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES OCTOBER 20.2018 )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 5 a AFFIDAVIT OF CIRCULATOR STATE OF COLORADO COUNTY OF . „„ } }ss } } Deposes and states: , being duly sworn, upon oath 1. That the affiant circulated the Petition for Annexation for the purposes of obtaining the signature of the above Petitioner. 2. That each signature therein is the signature of the person whose name it purports to be. NOTARY CERTIFICATE STATE OF COLORADO � `, COUNTY OF �,c, �� -V Circu } } } Subscribed and sworn to before me this Witness my hand and official seal. (seal) My commission expires: qfr Notary Pu 4;27- c, -- day of Page 5 of 5 c1Gu /7 ' 20/f. AMY R DROLLINGER Notary Public State of Colorado Notary ID # 201 84018356 My Commission Expires 01.27.2022 )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 6 o LEGAL DESCRIPTION: KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT STELLA S. GALLEGOS FAMILY TRUST AND PETE GALLEGOS, BEING THE OWNERS OF CERTAIN LANDS IN WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS, EXCEPT FOR PUBLIC RIGHTS -OF -WAY: PARCEL I: THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 100 ACRES OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO EXCEPTING THOSE PARCELS CONVEYED BY DEEDS RECORDED SEPTEMBER 15.2005 AT RECEPTION NO. 3323096 AND JULY 5, 2017 AT RECEPTION NO. 4315144. NOW KNOWN AS: LOT B, RECORDED EXEMPTION NO. 1207 -10 -2 -RE -2579, RECORDED NOVEMBER 16, 2000 AT RECEPTION NO. 2807299, LOCATED IN THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO. A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE WEST SIXTEENTH CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 10; THENCE NORTH 00°23'44" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 25.51 FEET ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF SECTION 10; THENCE NORTH 89°07'24" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 00°23'54" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 302.29 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°51'54" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1729.99 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°52'22" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 879.52 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°24'21" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 821.96 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°54'27" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 2293.98 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°24'42" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 341.63 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°07'50" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 14.76 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01°46'59" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 175.22 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°07'28" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 307.43 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL CONTAINS 1,981,309 SQUARE FEET OR 45.485 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. nut:blank 6/29/2( Page 7 PARCEL II: A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE WEST SIXTEENTH CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 10; THENCE NORTH 00°23'44" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 25.51 FEET ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF SECTION 10; THENCE NORTH 89°07'24" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°23'54" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 302.29 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°51'54" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1729.99 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 00°23'54" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 960.02 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°52'10" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 879.40 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°24'21" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 960.07 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 88°52'22" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 879.52 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL CONTAINS 844,258 SQUARE FEET OR 19.381 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. HAVE LAID OUT THIS ZONING AMENDMENT MAP OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED LAND UNDER THE NAME AND STYLE OF THE HIGHLANDS. THE CHANGE IN ZONING SHALL BE FROM THE EXISTING ZONING OF AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL ZONING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 16, OF THE MEAD MUNICIPAL CODE. THUS DESCRIBED ZONING AMENDMENT MAP CONTAINS 2,825,567 SQUARE FEET OR 64.866 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, TOGETHER WITH AND SUBJECT TO ALL EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS -OF -WAY EXISTING AND/OR OF PUBLIC RECORD. )ut:blank 6/29/2( N N THE HIGHLANDS ANNEXATION TO THE TOWN OF MEAD, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., TOWN OF MEAD, WELD COUNTY, STATE OF COLORADO 64.866 ACRES SHEET 1 OF 2 CERTIFICATE Of OWNERSHIP: KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT STELLA S. GALLEGOS FAMILY TRUST AND PETE GALLEGOS, BENG ME OMENS OF CERTAIN LANDS IN WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, HAVE HEREWITH PETITIONED TO THE TEN OF MEAD FOR ANNEXATION OF THE PROPERTY CMG DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS, PARCEL A THE NORTH JA OF ME SOUTH 100 ACRES OF THE NW To OF SEMITE 10. TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, REIM NB NEST OF TIE 8111 P.N., COUNTY OF NELO, STATE OF COLORADO ERCEPING THOSE PARCELS CONVEYED BY DEEDS RECORDED SEPTEMBER 15.20(5 AT RECEPTION NO. 33230616 ARID WRY S. 2017 AT REMOTION NO. 4315144. NOW KNOWN AS: LOT 8. RECORDED EXEMPTION NO. 1007 -10 -2 -RE -2670, RECORDED NOVEMBER TB, 2000 AT RECEPTION NO. 2807299 LOCATED N ME NW R OF SECTION IS, TOANSH1P 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 TI.ST OF THE 8114 P.N.. COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO. A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10. TOWNSNP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST O THE 8114 PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, WELD COUNTY. COLORADO AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY ORN HRW AS FOLLOWS CO R€NCNG AT TEE NEST SIXTEENTH CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST Al a SECTION f0, THENCE NORTH 00'2344" NEST. A INSTANCE OF 25.51 FEET ALONG SAID VEST LINE OF SECTION ID THENCE NORTH Ng1724" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 3(00 FEET TO ME POINT OF BEORNONO: THENCE NORTH 0123'54" WEST. A DISTANCE OF 302.29 FEET; THENCE NORTH 8851154" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1729.99 FEET; THENCE NORM 98'52'22" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 679.52 FEET: THENCE SUM 0074.21" EAST. A DISTANCE Cr 621.99 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 99'64.27" WEST, A DISTANCE O 2293.98 FEET: THENCE NORTH 0024'42" EAST. A DISTANCE OR 341.93 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 895)750" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 14.79 FEET. THENCE NORTH NEWER' EAST. A DISTANCE O 17622 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 699728' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 307.43 FEET TO TIE PONT O REDEEM, THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL CONTAINS 1,911,309 SQUARE FEET OR 46.495 ACRES. MORE OR LESS PARCEL R A PARCEL OF LINO LOCATED N TIE NORTHWEST (WARIER O SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 66 WEST O THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERMAN, WELD COMM COLORADO AND BERG MORE PARTICULARLY °EMPTIED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT 11E WEST SIXTEENTH CORNER O SAM NORTHWEST A D SECTION THENCE NORTH Do7744' HEST, A DISTANCE O 25.51 FEET ALONG SAD WEST LINED SECTION THENCE NORTH 079724' EAST, A DISTANCE O 30.00 FEET: THENCE NORTH 001754' EEST, A DISTANCE OF 20229 FEET: THENCE NORM 66'61'54' EAST, A DISTANCE O 1728.98 FEET TO THE PONT OF ENCEN0: THE NCE NORTH 0(2754' WEST, A DISTANCE O 96902 FEET: THENCE NORTH 683710' EAST, A DISTANCE O 879.40 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 00'24'21' EAST, A DISTANCE O 98007 FEET, THENCE SOUTH eR57n' WENT. A DISTANCE OF 879.52 FEET TO TIE POTHER OF 90006/40 THE ABOVE MOWEDN PARCEL CONTAINS 846,256 SQUARE FEET OR 19.3 ACRES. MORE OROR LESS, OWNER COUNTY O )ss: STATE O THE FOREGOING CERTIFICATE O OWNERSHIP WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS DAY O 20 MTNESS MY HAND AND OPTICAL SEAL NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: CNN, KINN II MINTY MAP NOT TO SCALE GENERAL NOTES: L BARS O BEARINGS: THE NEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER Or 111E NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10. TOWNSHIP 3 NORM, RANGE NA NEST OF THE ISM P.M. BEARS NOO23'M'W, BARD ON THE DEPARTMENT OF REGULATORY AGENCIES HORIZONTAL CONTROL NETWORK AND BENNG MOHURENTED BY A FOND f9 RENE 10TH A r ALUMINUM CAP IN RANGE BOX L.S. NO. 28273 AT THE NEST 9XIEDETH CORNER AND A 2.5" ALUMINIUM CAP M RANGE BOX LS NO. 23500 AT TIE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 10. 2. ACCORDING TO THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGO/CE FLOOD MAP. COMMUNITY PANEL NUMWER 06123CI810E M1TH AN EFFECTS DATE CO Cl/20/2016 ME SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED RI A 2131E X AREA DETERMINED TO BE THE AREA O MIMMAL ROOD HAZARD GHTTDE O THE 180 -TEAT ROOD PLAIN. J. NOTICE: ACCOFD8G TO COLORADO LAW, YOU MUST COAYENCE ANY LEON. ACTION BARD UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURES MTHIN THEE YEARS AFTER YOU FRET DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY (ERECT IN THIS 9MYEY BE CDIMENCED MORE THAN TEN TEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. 4. ANY PERSON 1840 KNOWINGLY RESIDES, ALTERS OR CEFACE5 ANY PUBLIC LAND SURVEY MONUMENT OR LAND BOUNDARY MONUMENT OR ACCESSORY COMMITS A CLASS TAO (2) M191EMEANOR PURSUANT TO STATE STATUTE 19-4-508. O THE COLORADO RLWOLU STATUTE. 5. MIS LAND SURVEY ODES NOT CONSTITUTE A TITLE SEARCH BY LANGE LAND SUTTEES, LAC. TO DETERNRIE 01WIEPTRP O TES PARCEL OF LAD. ERRE THE DESCRIPTION 90184, VERIFY THE COMPATIBILITY O THIS DESCRIPTION 10TH THAT OF THE ADJACENT PARCELS O LAND, OR %EWIEY EASEMENTS O RECORD. FOR ALL INFORMATION REGARDING EASEMENTS, RDHT-O-WAY OR TIKE O RECORD, LANGE LAID SURVEYS, LLC RELIED UPON CCMIATMENT NO. 00225154714 MTH AN ETTECTVE DATE O 12-22-2017 AT SOO PAL, PREPARED BY LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY. 8. INSTANCES ON TAS SURVEY ARE EXPRESSED N U.S. SURVEY FEET AND DECIMALS THEREOF. A U.S SURVEY FOOT IS DESCRIBED AS EXACTLY 1200/3927 DE GNU. CONTIGUITY: TOTAL BOIAOMY O PARCELS - 6.79&77 1/6 METAL PARCEL BDIMDARY - 1.464.48' TOTAL CONITIGU US TO TIE PRESENT TOMN O MEAD - 4.221598' SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I. JONATHAN R. LANGE. A REGISTERED PRO STATE OF COLORADO. DO HEREBY CERTIFY HEREON IS A CORRECT NUNEATON O TH AND THAT AT LEAST OE-SOTH (I/8) OF PARCEL IS CONTIGUOUS TO THE PR SENT I I FURTHER CERTIFY MAT TRS MM AND LI UNDER MY PERSONAL SUPERVISION IN THY JONATHAN R. LEIOE, PIS 37908 FOR AND ON BEHALF OF LANGE LAND SURVEYS, ILO PLANNING COMMISSION 37 RENEWED BY TIE MEAD PLANNING COMM 2011. ATTEST: CHAIRMAN PLANNING COMWSSION SECRETARY CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL BY THIS ANNEXATION MAP OF THE HIGHLANDS APPROLED AND ACCEPTED 80 ORDNANCE AND ADOPTED AT DE REGULAR MEETING COLORADO. HELD ON AS RECEPTION NO RECORDS OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER BOARD OF TRUSTEES D MEAD COLORADO. ATTEST: MAYOR TONG CLERK CLERK AND RECORDERS CERTIFI STATE OF COLORADO I COUNTY OF MEND ) THIS ANNEXATION MAP WAS FLED IN THE AT _ O'CLOCE. PAD _ M THIS _ OAY O N BOOK MAP RECEPTION N0. WELD COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER OEPU L7 MN - WOW) ma -ors �—! Page 2 c 01.10 ite a nut:blank 6/29/2( N N THE HIGHLANDS ANNEXATION TO THE TOWN OF MEAD, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., TOWN OF MEAD, WELD COUNTY, STATE OF COLORADO 64.866 ACRES SHEET 2 OF 2 1� ns SEAM 000'4245'E 702.32' (REC) Is to- ISE Cr POINT O' BEGINNING PARCEL I nue i• NAM GV eS 7W Na9V7'24'E 0002 344•W .70.0000'' 25.51 POINT OF leis arro COMMENCEMENT Cr PXIIWYM NN. SLt. 16 a Mar Er AGAWAM GAP, 1S F61A :77 Q b tiui h WHy1 3W zt § NORTHWEST CORNER =RCN I9 TAN. — r ita.AM CAP. HS 77SG9 NORTH LINE NOR 7HMEST OUAR TER SECTION 10 N8852'02E Ir 2639.43' OSNIM Nom Al Ink i \ I VALE NEW rum o no FINAL RAT \ NEC. NO 269160 gmrie KeXP. WILLA II _ COUNTY ROAD 988 _wig se. PAop.aaal 1729. 173000' NEC) sm. lee. Nsarr N S w.Nn Ime r; • carne nr. mwn SIN a pDM ICI rN S Air ""A a POINT OF BECINFANC PARCEL N POMP 1-I/I• PLASM CAP 2.1900 L NORTH QUARTER COPF/E7l_ wow 111 9M, bWeerr sir NWMAI C.V. RS NNW rN.RE. ten. rrE, N09T]'00'E e7s.e1' (9E1 ✓O✓✓ _dr A NW52' 679:40 iuA .../J—" APE sow rem It rRmq I I ILL I / "`a1 .8 121 /ML W sus EL EMAIL 797.47' 107.0. ((R A WEST QUARTER CORNER SLCC Act a PC Y KNIAC CV. Its MOW NON RECORD PILO AT STAIR _ N01'46'59'E 175.22' (A.M.) N0T55'35—E 175.16' (AEC) $699Y50"W N69'44'5O'W 14.9T (REC SWINE MAN ft ii • • sobs 6r1RE AOA.I N LIP u I,NNu• FORMERLY PARCEL I LOT B 1,98/,309 S.F. 45485 AC. STELLA GALLEGOS NEC NO. 2807299 ARM I R'K WI 1.1.1 VIVO II i i 1 1 MnKEII.:Nrr, I I xNWe nnrANM.n M wls,MEWL 1 i I PARCEL A I I 844,258 S.F. I 1 18381 AC. STELLA GALLEGOS 1 11 j NEC NO 2807299 I 1 11 1 111 II li II II M LANs 41 Nu n4an an MEWS II II I II I VI II 1169'44 01 armee EASINESS WS. Mt AMAMI, 3110'W !65.30' ( 56691'22'6' 679.52' (A.N.) Aremmtom An mesa sv DMA, It S 0014'211" 30.5 E 1'(4.11.) Ifft _� comfySOPS SWY9Wx90N / ANAL PEA 11 NEC 00 2951802 �I F ritrl I I 00701E MEN .SUEONS100 FINAL 1047 NEC. 00 2951802 N0O'24'21'W FEATHER I 825.15' (#30) 6�1�� s! 1 v r ?o • I !e_ a I �1„ i 4 I I M04E 82114-4 r- _i5' 1 I I � I l� i j�-^I'}f• � I �TiC .'YAiiy, I%ri` Ail FMAL M.AT , ' 1111 A�iliif AC �IR � A�' ?469d/04IL�, SOUTH LINE N0R77'INEST QUARTER SECTION 70_ N8854'79 _E 2639.40' 1 I I I I CENTER WARIER CORNER 5000805 I6 m mer LS' NONAW GAP. ALS 2MA7 L Long Lon, c� s SG SEI SECT MIASMA LAO sLIM aq-MS ,.Fry • 1 MO MIN OMER OM MOOT WINN NMI VW .UIN A. AY MO Mow NO MONO ONO MOM NO WOLK TA ROM me MORN %I VON PONS Npm ANA r IONS 011,000 u. V rr IN e TOM Nt tyro ONIONt. RNNCa- tANR WO SUMO 7iw IOW I0 Page 1 of Annexation Impact Report The Highlands Prepared for Weld County, CO May, 2018 )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 2 of Annexation Impact Report For The Highlands TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Map of municipality and adjacent territory Draft Annexation Agreement Municipal Services Municipal Services Financing Existing Special Districts Impact on Public School District Systems Introduction This impact report is provided to Weld County pursuant to C.R.S. 31-12-108.5(1) The Town of Mead, Colorado, has received an annexation petition for approximately 64.86 acres located within Weld County, owned by The Stella S. Gallegos Family Trust and Richard Romero, Personal Representative of the Estate of Perfecto Gallegos, Deceased. The property is proposed for zoning as Residential Single Family -4 (RSF-4) (PUD) under the Town of Mead Municipal Code, Chapter 16 -Land Use Code. Per the proposed annexation agreement, the maximum number of residential dwelling units permitted within the area to be annexed is 220. The following Exhibits are provided in support of this narrative. Exhibit A: Exhibit B: Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Town of Mead Comprehensive Plan — Future Land Use Map Existing and Proposed Water and Sanitary Sewer RSF-4 PUD Plan Annexation Map Zoning Amendment from Weld County A to Town of Mead RSE-4 PUD II. A map or maps of the municipality and adjacent territory showing the present and proposed boundaries of the municipality in the vicinity of the proposed annexation; the present streets, major trunk water mains, sewer interceptors and outfalls, other utility lines and irrigation and drainage ditches, and the proposed extension of such streets and utility lines in the vicinity of the proposed annexation; and the existing and proposed land use pattern in the areas to be annexed; The Annexation Map and Zoning Map, copies of which are included with this submittal as Exhibits A through E, have been created to identity the present and proposed boundaries of the Town of Mead, the existing and proposed land uses on the property to be annexed, and the general location of access points, The Highlands Annexation Impact Report May 24. 2018 )ut:blank 6129/2( Page 3 of buffer/transition areas, and the likely additional right-of-way areas for the future expansion of the surrounding road network. (II). A copy of any draft or final pre -annexation agreement, if available; Not available at this time. Due to the size of the development and the large amount of of site infrastructure, it is necessary for the developer to establish a special district to finance this development. This petition for annexation is conditioned upon the Town of Mead permitting the formation of The Highlands Metropolitan District and/or a Special District. Please refer to the additional information section for detailed information on the proposed district(s). (III). A statement setting forth the plans of the municipality for extending to or otherwise providing for, within the area to be annexed, municipal services performed by or for the municipality at the time of annexation; As part of the Annexation Agreement, municipal services will be provided to the area to be annexed The property being annexed is identified inside of the Mead Planning Influence Area, is identified in the Town of A/lead Comprehensive Plan, and is a logical extension to the Town of Mead. A. Water: Little Thompson Water District 8. Sanitary Sewer Town of Mead C. Storm Drainage: Private by special district D. Other Utilities: i. Qwest Communications currently provides telephone service within the proposed annexation vicinity. No change in this service is proposed. ii. United Power currently provides electrical power within the proposed annexation vicinity. Xcei Energy currently provides natural gas services within the proposed annexation vicinity. No change in this service is proposed. iii. The Town of Mead provides its own police protection and will extend police protection services to the area proposed to be included within the town's boundaries as part of this annexation. iv. The maintenance of proposed streets within the annexation will be provided by the Town after construction to town specifications and acceptance by the Public Works Division. v The Town of Mead Erie provides municipal services such as recreation and senior services. No infrastructure extension or expansion is required. The Highlands Annexation Impact Report May 24, 2018 )ut:blank 6129/2( Page 4 of (iv). A statement setting forth the method under which the municipality plans to finance the extension of the municipal services into the area to be annexed (those municipal services supplied by the Town; As part of the Annexation, The Highlands is requesting the formation of The Highlands Metropolitan District and/or a Special District as a method of participating in the costs of providing services to support the development of the project (v) A statement identifying existing special districts within the area to be annexed; SPECIAL DISTRICTS RE1J - Longmont/St. Vrain Valley School District Mountain View Fire Protection District Little Thompson Water District and St Vrain Left Hand Water District iv. Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District v. High Plains Library Longmont Conservation District (vi). A statement on the effect of annexation upon local public school district systems including the estimated number of students generated and the capital construction required to educate such students. According to the St. Vrain Valley School District, the number of anticipated student yield from the homes within The Highlands at full buildout are as follows: • Mead Elementary School.- 48 students (22 students per dwelling unit) • Mead Middle School: 22 students (.10 students per dwelling unit) • Mead High School High School: 24 students (11 students per dwelling unit) Capital Mitigation fee for the St. Vrain Valley School District is $970 per dwelling unit will be provided at the time of each building permit. The Highlands Annexation Impact Repot t 'May 24. 2018 )ut:blank 6/29/2( I Li t r L.. V V/ Page 9 of ;t tt. A W Revised March, 201$ 1)1M(:I AIMER All data and information contained herein err for planning purposes onls Ihrc information dues not replace legal Jescnption mininiatton in the chain of tite and other information contained in official gtr vr(nmental records such as Al the Weld t..t►unty Clerk and Recorders Unite or in tilt iuurts. Aba, the teprcwentat►un tit locations in the map data cannot be substituted lot actual legal surveys. the information contained herein is belreveil accurate and suitable lire Iuutied use and is subject W the limitations set forth above. 1hr town al Mead makes no ++arrant) as to the ass uracy or suitability at any inhumation umlauted herein. Users assume all risk and rreesspunsibtlns fur any and all dant• ages, including consequential damage., which flow tram the user's use ►►t information FUTURE LAND USE PLAN Land Use Categories RR Rural Residential LIR SF It CMU CI A • a V • w • A • • Clustered Residential Large Lot Residential Single Family Residential Multi -family Residential Residential Mixed Use Mixed Use - Residential/Commercial Commercial Mixed Use Downtown Mixed Use Regional Commercial Business Park Planned Industrial Mixed Use Public/Semi-Public Park/Open Space Agriculture Nrinbab� Gateways into the Community Secondary Gateways into the Community Mead Town Limits (2018) Mead Planning Influence Area (2018) Proposed Elementary School Sites Proposed Middle School Sites Proposed High school Sites Potential Sites for Public Facilities Section Numbers (Each section represents an area id approximately tine square mile) NORTH nit:blank 712/2( •4a16 amain **ic • ausi Nru trit q-i11A r •.+ it. _ww',**. t SCUt4- alC K JM•Ilw T1$ ixMaa• *041:1 f0 Sr: 1K 1e Ian COMM I WO 7 aalu�ii`i l ilL 1t1VtlLl11VUJ A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10 TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH P M TOWN OF MEAD COUNTY OF WELD STATE OF COLORADO 64 866 ACRES TOTAL 220 SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING UNITS iitarOvtllaar Mptp 3s — .-- "1.40 - COUNTY ROAD 36 1 a'. COMTY ROAD ri sea at ., .-__ -t alt qua U$4 COMITY MOM it 1 _ 4 I- r { law ,h. FEATHER I I RIDGE ESTATES I I FINAL Pt A T t ; REC NO. 1469040I I I I --N I II II !0 ¶Op / �'�' )♦ 11. •';Uf COYOTE RUN SUMP WSION FINAL PL A T RTC. NO 2951802 I F' S It t I I fit it I I T 1 LEGEND tr WV. WC* aae euT„R a bf.14LNRMMtit Page 10 of �. L..it. 4.4,... 100114.1 awes I �)aolal tan ^w rrapaiaS . us %FRLA CUttistLnN&i t,KUUP. LLC I i'v M a Ka *s.Yt. war .AM (Is,t U a4 IC ".II�ITI,F I{I THE MS SS / MIDIONINOI'—It `arm Mead. Co • u•. re n^+ )ut:blank 7/2/2( 1 ril; nlvnL/llvIJJ Page 11 of I EGAL DESCRIPlION PARCEL THE NORTH 12 of THE sows 100 ACRES OF THE NW lM OF SECTION 10 TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH RANGE 66 WEST THE 601 PIA COUNTY OF WELD STATE OF COLORADO EXCEPTING THOSE PARCELS CONVEYED BY DEEDS RECORDED SEPTFIJNFR 15 200SAT RECEPTION NO 3321091 AND LW/ 6 2017 AT RECEPTION NO 4316144 NOW KNOWN AS LOT B RECORDED EXEMPTION NO 120710-2 RE 2579, RECORDED NOVEAWER 16 2000 AT RECEPTION NO 2207229 LOCATED N TLE LAN 1N OF SECTION ID TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH RANGE 66 WEST OF TILE AIXPM COUNTY Of WELD STATE OF COLORADO A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST OUARTER OF SECTION 10 TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH RANGE TO WEST OF THE 6711 PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN WELD COUNTY COLORADO AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS COMMENCING AT THE WEST SIXTEENTH VIRMFR OF SAID NORTHWEST I41 OF SECTION IQ THENCE NORTH 00'2344 WEST A DISTANCE OF 2351 FEET ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF SECTION 10 THENCE NORTH 690724 EAST A ...STANCE OF 3000 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING THENCE NORTH 00'2354 WEST A INSTANCE OF 302 29 FEET THENCE NORTH 895154 EAST A DISTANCE OF 1729 90 FEET THENCE NORTH 696222 EAST n DISTANCE OF 07832 FEET THENCE SOUTH 092421 EAST A DISTANCE OF 62106 FEET THENCE SOUTHB6 5427 WEST A DISTANCE Of 229126 FEET THENCE NORTH 092442 EAST A DISTANCE OF 34163 FEET THENCE SOIIDI89 0739 WEST A DISTANCE OF l4 76 FEET THENCE NORTH 01 2659 EAST A DISTANCE OF 17522 FEET THENCE SOUTH 603729 WEST A DISTANCE OF 30743 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGVWWG WE ABOVE DESCRBED PARCEL CONTAINS 1861309 SCE lADF FEET OR 4541L5 ACRES MORE OR LESS PARCEL C. A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10 TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH RANGE IN WEST OF THE 6711 PRINCIPAL MERID4W WELD COUNTY COLORADO ANO BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS CNIMFNONG AT THE WEST SIXTEENTH Ftv4FR OF SAO NORTHWEST 4/4 OF SECTION 10 THENCE MOIHN W 7344 WEST A ULSTANCE OF 24LS1 FEET ALONG SVII WEBt LINE OF SECTION IC THENCE NORTH 890724 EAST A DISTANCE OF 30 0D FEET 'HENCE NORTH 0472352 WEST A DISTANCE OF 90229 FEET THENCE NORTH 895154 EAST A DISTANCE OF 172829 FEET TO THE PONT OF BEGINNING THENCE NORTH 002054 WEST A DISTANCE OF 98002 FEET THENCE NORTH 60•3710 EAST AD2STANCF OF 87840 FEET THENCE SOUTH 00 2421 EAST A DISTANCE OF 50007 FEET THENCE SOUTH NN 5222 WEST A DISTANCE OF 81051 FEET TO TILE POINT OF BEGINNING THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL CONTANS 844230 SQUARE FEET OR 18381 ACHES IgRE ORLESS A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10 TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH P M TOWN OF MEAD COUNTY OF WELD STATE OF COLORADO 64 866 ACRES TOTAL 220 SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING UNITS CERTIFICA I IONS 16mH6 ... "Tn.I wRw Ron N. rR.p.mxen dw fuv_dhrow CH 9a �w4ENTre ITS G4N ��J'nnentdxdw Even 'Fa Lab,. u .wnnhM1ws 4x O.v�ra uHxT use Stn. 1ConuJ+ i u � r1 y u4W.1 14n .4n6 ue wn1 2k e W rcr 414.2 7 Ina not.o, 44.421 P.m lu C ByL0L6A6 O0UL hPv�7wm. NrJltin Y n K _at Penny camonsun a2. mg Cmxuw 94.4 ETA sJ ofA4pnrei II 4LJALEX NM¢w inane wu 410 14. mr2m 0 upN 11 niy 6e Al,.ewr4 Jcum .a lea 'ego ca Wean Ca413,41 4411441 wont Acv t VICINII Y MAI' NOT TO SCALE C'WYII04035 II NI BM `yCL` LO III II 4'n�J 4 II k 34 FINE F COUNTY ROAD I SHEEP INDLX 1 COVER SHEET 2 CONTEXT & ZONING MAP 3 PUD PLAN 4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 5 CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN 6 GRADING MASTER PLAN 7 UTILITY MASTER PLAN LW( LL UPMLYII LI l 444 4444441,41,4 INALDUL MLRTIA CONSULTING GROUP LL( N.An a0..0 1.11,113.11 COVER SHEET 1 of 7 )ut blank 7/2/2( t tit/ tl l U ty L H IN in Page 12 of 1 +1 1 i I ' I 1 III I I I Ii I I I I ILDIOCU.TLIRE ININCORPORATED WELD C:OuNTY I I 1 1 l 1 • A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10 TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH P M TOWN OF MEAD. COUNTY OF WELD STATE OF COLORADO 64 866 ACRES TOTAL 210 SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING UNITS • N • / i I -aaaa ..VIVO_' AVMS 40 ,...r .s -I- -- raja, p'--_ . area. e. I..rP We el. n Ire "•- Y w ��.= n —•.� ••• r V^.- - d• OMOMOr�r....0.. .YC+ Safe it S. -r.. t• -.r_> 1 1 1 t • I • I 1 • 1 • 1 tESIDENVIM. Swat FAMILY DETAC)ES 1 UNINCORPORATED WELD COUN1 Y I 1 • I 1 I • 1 I 1 I I I apoirt lee as • ( I wr..... w...\.a •-,. .- `• ♦`\ ♦ ♦\ •\•„..‘•„. may\ ♦ � ti •♦ ♦♦ •♦ ♦ \•'•'\♦ ....r �1 ♦�y .\.. "•ti_.._.- w.....r._� ♦ \ •1 I . • +' . \ v \.♦ \ w- \\ �.\ . -`ter... �a� .. \♦ \w - r...w� w_..+. �-v....r.» •t '1 \\• \1_----.,,c)„,,.\, k......%„,..>,, + "“••••••:••••%••••,, r\ti 1\ ,I♦�:R♦\ t 1 )♦_k♦\.�`♦♦s`♦`r.~+�~♦ �.r., •.~r �+ll�,♦�.►- ♦.. .,..`\`°'w ♦♦• •\�•j'\II �♦1 `�` •��` i,\• `wee aaa ♦ .7% t �, N. ., ti ••..tip �-1 I r ----t. 1 , 1 •r,\\s\• •\.,R' -a �RE� tiTl h, fA 'id ;i I111 L1k '$--r�.•- 1 i I 1 2 ,) ,rArtirtceVet8r6 ,� ,,, I • \I\ ti f 1) /Q jam.` ;:��\ti\ ° r /7/1„// • f \ `` te aw dr •• ` / r{/ // � ,/ /// f , ////„/ ^ )/' I/„ • N ''rte e7 / f l y;t::‘ �I \� `` '\ If /f !/ else" " edit • / (j / t I / • /� / '' 71.a...# ...O....Tee'''. �' +' "'/ /rte if /reA te � 'r r"lr• .• I I RE$10ENUAL SINGLE FAMIYu£TACriEP UNINCORPORATED WELD COIN 1 r 090 SS— , Int at - z _ w .. - ;.t . _ ..._ - : • s:'S-..`..'-.. ter:: 1I I - titls s I I I I • 1O 6G.A .E. " • ->0 -1::s LIMN& Mro:l Lua+IRMIi. 111 WA! .I t i).CD*4k I:RTIA l'ONSUI.II!ti4 GROUP, `tv Una Sllac S44Wt )1I lkar a. 1I)19?It; t''A4'1/I:11 1111 millitilIMPOIMIP Sea amiliveKam. wawa a —_ta 7 atm"NI, a. in pin .E I1►Ti 44.• alga CONTEXT MAP 2 of 7 )ut:blank 7/2/2( I -Si te •..,..•. .... • 1 I 1 r -'-----T Rail CONNECT ION t t1 G U IU U LJ IN UJ A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10. TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH P M.. TOWN OF MEAD. COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO 64.866 ACRES TOTAL 220 SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING UNITS nor • • 1 • S -elee•.- r 1 I / 1-.,__ .-- - -- I I \ N ,' III LEG�ND 'iii —tar- 4 4 'al pARK OPEN SPACE S 1 LANDSCAPE 0Uf1CR • A wpm I' I it 1 !!tp lr AFC NO P{WI0A _e 4I `\ MM D :/INtt)SCANL SLIP F t.)i __ PARK B 0.96 ac VEHICULAM ACCESS POINT An. * TRAIL CONNECTION w 1 4 a - I � 1 �(1 I � 1 P • e COMET Mite SUM FRAU #%A7 sit‘ 000 7M'AC? GOAN. TRAIL COWEc.TION / ,,.. �•• V S O *' Page 13 of tJ .S t:LUPfM UI I . LIA J:! Isalkrt wars LasrasuL l0 M))41 ,VI,9cr witpwgaaaa3dr. alga. I'RTIA(ONSLIL INC. (.401., P. La !1I Man Nan ‘gare 14e1R. CO IN:Ke -N1•471.S1)1 Z J J 15 a. Wads sr AP Let.... as ts.t toatE A 1,,$04 004.915 PUD PLAN )ut:hlank 7/2/2( t III: t iltit1LJINUM II I Page 14 of L (iENEkAL INTENT I n eft regreareer Suadevenon a proposed a tarot} tnera l y rreayriDurtAaid that provides a vanaty a7f detacnea save fanny nun:es options r ne pan prapubee btu l4I pocket car*b mei a 'iegnbumutd pare which are wnet .meaeO wen ever space ....endure and trab the property u au:Joundea ail de sides cry existing Or Praposea,esaaentra ceveIo(xnent Peaesman and r ene-whir ccsutrk:ead1s are ptawded two The as nicest neignoomooa to create a sensed comma -hay aria to not separate dub ;regnborrood ham fire exsaing residents went me t own of Mead r asn.pnance wlm me general intent at the 1 own s L.ornprenensrve fawn We Put) pioneer fire Town wan a coo c)aatea aria namtoruous deveidpment *nice av11 best planet(' the nosh: safety order convenience prospenty and genera satiate at Its residents Its Nub responds to me goals and lwtlues a me t,omprenervwve rear. area is planned to &Lett* ryyte leent*) aevercipreent cotaepatbt ,vim Vnt S.ettOursOng ane uses and she nat.:, Si OlivaiNrbeat It Au I ril3ftlI Y A Approval of Ptane upon approval aA and adoption of tits PLC Dy me Toren d Meat Board W T,U*teerb. War document snail become Me Aver fang zoning OuCaetletit td one development alai uses was. i r* itgs*anc Any tern nut wveiee° Dy rlaee sbpuisbun a sties De wren -tee Dy the (own td Mead Minicipdt code W Connects r fit ill oversaw a t thee I- UU snail playas and govern the aae.ai:Jay teard at the nryruafutb PLO pulvna iJ rvavenv i node the provsbwnb Of the Pull du rQ atany esteem a v et tit subject tie Iawisaetns of ills loan at Meal Municipal e.utle tar trod underling Lure Uaeu* 1 rrlmt apply as ikeei mined by tie �aflri.utrty iJeveknpn.eae ornerier C Underlying -Lane ()minces nl I tic uaiJetsyiliy h aria.: 4.4 Mead Ltlrt Uf snct is Kastaatr aise 4,RST 4) uENERAL REQUIREMENTS A Landscaping t.ltalriternty Oebigti Set teems ra111 tsx* Cuse to na lung f the ngiearlas a quaky conmurrty These elements rill allude uawrns pray► amenity weds. Connecting open bpal.e comma tarldst,apeu entry features anti maarnereabUA appropriate iynpng. ,ciedeetnan aria brew* CSMetlalso n pates. Street trees in aunt a es tort i amen uldotm porn a fantasy and uttltr aeprupnaee clesyn teatuuse The primary Wattage arras an Le eatialscaltcd *nth naive a yts d grasses and scalletea we trete the wen statements areas are ptaptabeJ 51 trio stab pinta no tie nerglex rrev.; Nan County Rosa Sb arm Gourley Ruda 7 These areas will usr,ruas Si entry manurioin Align min afrkd'w iapriy to provrka a senile and anneal nib the rtetyrlbcarraaud Marna lance at these owl spirt WDaa m a as be% ryluy fire be Me reepuwlbtrty at the hanrsiwntdb asauc.rlau, magi menu throne to, be established to Vim .owl tar uty II* twine Da40H sfaaal install beret yard tat iascapatg area Saturltat& eryatrar 'hysteria db 101Cieb AI 4.6109e al one ;I, uecatuuaab tree l] every forty I4.0) wwadi teat at tree lawn am ScriI at Me flume or pupal thereof nasal an ne strata. of the $n.eevay AYty aerviieb aria lac reitelity rrangit Seven (71 aerec.ape srtuwe to tae front yard setbao4 at weal home 4 Sod for the hont yard SerbaC. of oda ' aura b. Three anal rte a mailman d 5e.unly hie peocent 15%, eve materials Deta.eere the fruit tit Me nutlet and the cure unities otherwise apl40ve0 by Wit luwn, 6 The auiomaSc irrigationeySsna shah tae from the Wmesbc tap to true tune I Trod rwrneasees Stet naiad the tust/wray landscaping a instas (emanate tit peel' aria S encouraged We pant adamcorat trees shrubs area Harries using vertscape pirn.ps:fa area Ile giantess t ruvlbk.rtb set kW el al I ow: regulations o Mays I trod yewa and Iaraisc.apang w stun ins aofacenr road Net of -way in acciiousce arm I own regwations 1 B Fencing r ne fencing prerglain to The tigntataal WU* tie at a consistent ahtbigr: and Cola dvauglf0ut Ire raaageDOrtkx'ed and snail anauoe me following Fen i ng tot stlbadertial rots weyan Toe Highlands SAS C. A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10 TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH P M TOWN OF MEAD. COUNTY OF WELD. STATE OF COLORADO 64.866 ACRES TOTAL 220 SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING UNITS oe vnyt or Manned wand Vnyt a wand tenang shall be d a [tick t.umpr enaereary b the prunery color of the ruiners within trio ,Myhbornoo0 Petrnelet privacy Maces shah be mil or stained soca a maximum of 6 feet Wt neighs Where imam d Jtfern e9 teems sae me taller fence shah taper (at a nedanhrne 2 1 ratio) to Me mete rA the vas lance Open ►tar fens" rwri be rriyi u stadueo *tile lads a leauflwn of ♦ feat n neynt tin property adjacent w rltemat open space 4 infernal a ine fens g sneer be met Ix started wood olivdt.y ur tail are snail be of a canersten ( testy. Trail Cannechons i'edestrian Ina bt[yCoe access war De provided via a tram caruiec-taan a one southeast corner Or V'e Site b the regional oar Anew siaesatk along /Ke ass see at county Hoag T ere proved* a pedestrian cawnecson to the existing tram along the scut. sloe or fearer Ridge SrtdtvisrOn and a pews -Irian way rare the cue at I own I ran mirages are provedea Ifucugnottt the internee open spacerpark areas .at The frigrdarnds The toots at these vas Goalla-eons a ID cannec.t pacesmans horn tie attached sidewalks aloong the intents streets to the pocxet Narks D Parts and Open Space A tow at 15 53 acres Lei v6%) ur me sits area Is pis raeu four upon space aria parks A 3 1 acre Iatrtt rerutrntud part via De the antral gathering space la Me nergrieur11a43�Tw he park ill include a leuwqurptlse play Meta picric wester aria playa are, The parka bordered by streets Uri three s.oes creating a nsbie awl easily wavissaara auk Item connotes and selewaMs tie rarer ire oak tram ail patens Jr rnt :aeteetaxhdc.'a E Density canpilance 'Neel We l own s COMOS ce nsrve Plan U aft anted Mean 2018 etas of 220 S&e*s g units ate pMuptriie0 at a ja ass Jet 'say at s J1f aweang units per rue IV COMMUNITY DESIGN PRINCIPLES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS inn trlbwuty slates now the prapoeed PUtl deviates her. A(DCIe-h t.cr1Ulltrity Design and Development Starwaros as stated van' [rte Town or Mead Musoupal Lode A kestoenuat Architecture - Singe) rAmoy Untamed the intent wenn the rryrhareas eUfi aab butrdevtbalea is lo toile names at venous natrtctuat designs that resole to the street and abate aversaty was vaneny artery aeemetics sheets Mare of the flumes bran have pons porches stardeete4 setbacea vandbae U. yatage pfete ineel and a .aiioty St uadOnng tea; t eher to uaatwnal Ca kes:kr styles and riagtetrirheuat These PUG usauaroo are rrnsrwed to ensure tat an adequate mu of ramie*. ar10 eters are altered erletltrl [rat raghpdrfaoou sod welsh each buck tact The M enden:s slatted !saloon vary meaty from rod Town S J+versa) regusemeetb as *ad le Arta e a Cunantruty Design) and Deaso utlate Star4a scM Jame, the Town at Mesa Mrelunt.rpat Cade (fit deveaswe: boater along with the Town Midi estate Mast Itgwtn tt its al irbdetekkei homes are Dail on set Ictr lea as lot now snag comply stem Town Standards Sateen) usenet, flit Deutwb treater Ulan 6 luta A [nook w Aetineu by uattrsechne streets Or cipen space tracts a tail truck race alias contemn at watt had t4) diftetent modem. mat nave OekrMtve ro )shorts in feuta led.'- Ganhjltaa0tfra abed maasrng Uastterureketaoc III moles requires three (3) at the I0$ov nt/ .arIatawas 1 Eieverrk?ia 2 Size 3 Cora scheme J Use of ekbarkx matertats S Root torn. b Messing D E:aaa ece d the moot snail contain no more Man rum (3) of tie same building elevanteons wart the same araieeckslae style c the same model van tree same atYNectral elevations seas a.t.l De psacnu i a)aa slat le each oiler Or dlreCtry across the street tom one another a Each mine maw snag have at east t*ii tti elevataais all prince styrslac devotedly The may ✓ iclude 1 that turnlsttraes and ironies 1 Vanes wiffaoa and JDo Styles J vaned entry treatments and Wcatiens tncktdmy pat hies t:okrnns.. et. 4 devise and two-story rimes e ire mass at one name shwa strongly reeect me ascrstectural styes and be screed to provide mesa interest and depotreduce wairaes& arid achieve an artiwiafe i ttaxm tin me tort and Willer bides at tnr nexuses In Plannng flea 1, and Sett tronts rears aac :tenet woes e Pansies Area 2 I Elnancemerts on elevations stall De p ovaaed Sc, none or. corner WAS that wee a Sleet at part. Cotner rote shall Die aide enough to avow tca stop er3.ation erhaancements AI least two t2) at tit bewaring enhancements are required t A scot a woes -Sound pawn ur a bay dean% 2 Windows or grazed doors that tact the sae street Or Park .3 Acreage in me veacal or rwrtzot-tal wail paws s txacxetb jtufecbixeb best UDtabeb Jr tithed aft Jeteue g rants not garages shall be eimptaasizeo Ore :esaaentai streets :anations el garage ;mardment n reldbUes to me lace at the 5V ua ore snail De rmpfenaented aaay me sock race to Inoue* garage hoist, garage tcnsarc ant, recessed garages Alternate load garages are a&courage0 but not equu et7 n Garage doors shall nut t:anprat More Mara 52% to a two -ter gaage and 55% tor a twee -car garage at tit street lacing [near Duran° dontaye for a Strfoot wide ice aria 45% tar a two tin garage and 50% la a mine car garage of Me meta tacng Wear taskwsg tanage la a 60 -loot we* lot ) Three car garages anal nor nave trod same limit fa(ayb pane Line garage Day alas be at least two feet at set horn tee two Day garage and be beparalec Dy a war at teabt tau teat wide I he trona wall d a side Loadeda c iente Lien yard soiled garage naay wapiti) Me trait yard seiDrrit up to :au teat [no We of Be garage tracing the street 51155 nauuder windows a titer salltectual tiela is Mc. r?ari,,- :ere Jaen It V1119 purtaix.a :nf the aweting V. RESIDENT tat. DENSITY AND DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS ZONE STANDARD Minimum Lot Area per Gross Density Mrumum Gross Density Iwnsny Maxrnt.rl heir igriun. Let Yearn ilea( wet dwelling) htrvmum Street F -.mists Front Yard Setback - as :Reasurea from Pavenwru save on a Pnr..te Betio RSF-4 TOWN STANDARD 6.250 SF 2 0 Dwelling Units per Acre 4 0 Dwelling Units Pt Acre 5U reel 40 reel F:;,nt ...acted tuai age Porch Or pnntar1 Stuctcr4 Aconiter dung: ad Side Vesta Sethedt Prirtipat bWiaiN Accessory Btuackng Corn ter SIDS ISO Setback 20 rail RSF 4 PAID Planting Area 1 Plarvtnu Area 2 5.500 SF 8.600 SF 3 39 DU.Ac 50 feet :measurer at )meat setbae k 50 feet on a straight street frontage 30 feet on a curl -rte sac at curved fruitage Edge of Public Street Right at Way or 20 feet to lace of garage dour 14 fekrnt 25 feet u feet 5Mei 501, May rat be placed forward of ate tient tact JI V1e struLlut J twit 5 lewd 10 feet ad)acwnt ie a pttwr suet: right -or -way Or prwir@ drive 5 teat to an rltervenng Mil uncaps Via attar W Vie nil 'rt-uf-nay Rear Yard Setback Pr impel Ekriaing Owe met tea entrance tactng ant Accessory Batas yls Maaum tin . EiurOtr. 1 t4erj)ni Price spa JU.u.LuC Maximum Staking height Aca:'wsauy Sleet re Marenum LOt CgywaQe 5 teat 5 feet lu feet 15 feel rNerlOr lots tt, Wet at east a a south teuperty [AAA xltr y feet lu runt St ?tee St teed St) beet Sc feet 50% Perntied ertetaachnuente see burdety setbacks J Ar-t:tsaectufiii features nt7Mdny taut rat strrwd lu Doi with Day wrnddwb alleviative entertainment ment centers Dock styes cs:oievefs. counterfoils a:a Circab. t4IM4taeb wing waste and rkr wctmsaum )natures may moister into the required setbacks a snaasi n en of 24 names D Waldo. ways may encrtwch MID require° set tut a maau tin Of 36 notes t Unenoaaed or uncovered hates tees than 30 canes above grade may encJoacte Ireu building .mires ss 1L warn b,re 4 SI feel Jt a rot NM d Enaoacnments may not eMeno aut. aasertutnts autbuut mitten appauvaa from the easement hoiden t k i IA t()Nst 1 11Nli (site ►U`P, LLl •.el Maw Sum% soda :rte Heats .tUSAL 7.h1 -47I- 3: %I I -f lEIIINVISIMIMMIP issweibeitaw walla en. LA n pal aaat :*4, pt+waa at ✓yes e% JEVELOPMEN r STANDARDS .4 wt:hlanl: 7/2/2(- SUGGESTED PLAN PALETTE tf?E TREES ...�wc ,•wtv •thAMENlAL IRE es _: N rt.M 1f 1(t $..,,tl LF L44tEN TRELs r.r • ^a r . ..A'.GC r 'a PUP sr:MART _t.. IS'XCN.IFNTALIS 4ULkl: Js RAa.Uk it a L4 •al U 1 A CatEENSP1RE -.4.k Ft. 'n,udjts NORYVLta,ANSL,SET 'iLL:i+T5�t 'R,ACAAT .MS ',crams ssvust f hula LALSLArANA Lithely* ;list.* • :tisLU'ENM ✓AgYC,J.aTA •'Nu S A•CA' •MICA ARSS:AlA �Nvu� i LEAA1S .AA#rrioar S PritAMIL 6utALL.A UAviOli ELLEN a stub. 14.NDEU"itt.V' WARN CFCs VI NE AMONtA 14k..AeQCARPA AROuuCJIS atauty *PUS AROMAT ICJt (SRO LOA' t.FRCOCAia'US INTTT(ATius L t 17bUS PUR ANS 3PM•sWA G LLI AMFgt sh•cr.jR AaldtQL a :$tuNWS at SSE Y: Walt EArpKy( • 3TREET TRALs • SPCciALTr ,.AANASCAPE MEAT Wm 7 • S ishAtaL & 7. &SPiiA t•O IRAs, CONPICCT I' ,I • , I' •I , I4 , I II I 'I 1 •I 1 t • • CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN The Conceptual Landscape Plan identifies key areas designed for parks arid open space improvements within the overall c nteAt Of tfie P U L) L•enarai descliptiotlm are included to provide the character of each space, Each area has a brief I s! 01 potential uses 4110 character that is not intended to be an a inclusive Itst of potential uses Additional uses mar be added ur removed in any of these areas during detailed design process ▪ • • • • • • ` '� • • • • t • • • 1 • I • • 1 UM, 11101-1LAINUJ A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10. TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH P M TOWN OF MEAD. COUNTY OF WELD STATE OF COLORADO 64 866 ACRES TOTAf 220 SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING UNITS \•••••••••__...--- _anam.. -a...a_ Or f I • • • • e. I • • ( • T .. T.,...• —F+ • 1 I • eta CeltemoR • LNLSCIWE A curt P10(lt: • SITE FtRNITL'Rt • CWEN SPACF . pep PASS I. TRAILS • LANDS'�CAPL ACCENI MOUES • i&AtGAUVN0 • OPEN PLAY FIELDS • SITE FURHITURE • SHADE STRUCTURE • NTERPRE To&E 3AGNAG& • ACTflrE RECQEATO. AREAS • o03PAO% • IENC•NG 4,��`. �'`.�� • `..__1 • SEAT NODES I' ,?. `- `) Taa• SITE F111 MTTURE ;�`. • . ` • OPEN SPACE 'p WV I r NC, AO IW►aaa PARK OPEN SPACE S. LANDSCAPE BUFFER ININWINIA, TRAM. CONNECTION • STRUT TREES • SPECIALTY LAI•IOSLAPE TREATMENT • SeGNAGE NUAlutaN7At it/A - 'fir! I• 1 o. a II • • COME' a s RAS lflat rtar Wt. wnews • PLAYGROUND ' • TRALS • OPEN FLAY FIELD • SITE FURNISHMIG ` • CCMMLMTY GATNERI Nt WAGS k /•/ • PARK • TRAILS • OPEN PLAY FIELDS • SITE r URNISHING • 0O0 AREA PARK • PLAYGROUND • TRALS • OPEN PLAY FIELD • SITE NJRst iIMCi • SPECIAL rr GARDEN Mew • SPECIALTY LANDSCAPE TREATIENT • TRAILS • S,Tt FURNISHIN, — Page 15 tuirmi•N a. lof 4:4 t4i•Oi rt waft Lana t U MI%I vdut i•)KP1•y ghtsAL. as u 4•G••E0 \ SHTIA CONSUL 1 IMi ti&0$iP. LU' S:n Mss.* %4x1. %•/• TAM1 DSO. LEI .i1 C ':A17ttl L1 T1* YUR ISIS num. MSS.. Irt pin St OAK a.„11,;L CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN rat:blank 7/2/2( 1 1 11 : 11 1 R 1 1 l L, t11 ‘11J tJ Page 16 of L.L.Ci.VI'.4t .. i.7 A.2pMt . , ,..1-V MOttp ...r. WU emit a Tars t %PIO Xtgll ►' n, - i S. S 1r-sw •n'K _porn -eta' theta M(M. its Qum soap a IHie cam", MOM A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10 TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH P M TOWN OF MEAD COUNTY OF WELD. STATE OF COLORADO 64 866 ACRES TOTAL 220 SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING UNITS �fi ie tor COUNTY ROAD $6 _ i ut. COUNTY MOM a wsaa. eta — i w ttMwr 1 134 COUNTY MOM !. Mr . al 4 I .x, I I I I I I I I In 4 I � I rJ S / c r , IMOMIM SCALE COYOTE RUN SUB81 VISION FINAL PLAT RTC NO. 29574902 II 1 — H I ar _ TJ I ----'1 I t I 1 I Ii � S .' I I C h FFA TNER RIDGE" ESTATES 4� FINA/ of A r I REC. NO 2469040 s i I it LEGEND •- --�� PR SANTOAT *MR car rrat Pet Maim Utaitliu, OYr tarnt. • r . r..... . ,SW poc,u o.,yci aw• _ a salflIMMI NERTIA t ONSULTTN6 tiRUUP, LU• • Mats wak N11rc NM 10,0. ii)*1W 'b�JCL i I ii H TO SNIP _R_ Apeans tt NSINOISINKPIS INININS Nana UTILITY PLAN 6 of nut:blank 7/?/2( Page 17 of l L 1LI I1VI I1 E%IVUJ A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH. RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., TOWN OF MEAD, COUNTY OF WELD, STATE Of COLORADO 64.866 ACRES TOTAL 220 SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING UNITS ri.e vitt" \NANPAVe .1M— .44_ 410 __441tut% \ .‘..k,..4'* riliMag Ill in lailIMM,10 imil avikt”, ‘4; I i `*, u, slip ilt mu. I eIIIII moo- lJ.,j ()__ mgN. %*".;,1 - - _ m.._, ....,_, '� i1M� lli' --4-------irim---,__-=_=30.--.z IIIII,I, i I I g!!! ��\frWL�\ �� . _ _ �p��1'r . �/�''--gyp.. - �✓ - V Wir IM��ir�i�l ' , l! �, �.. ,..,�� WO NRI113Airmoionor __ __JAM IR 4i!!J4' iii, Uh/i at i,rias' if -- ENEkTIA 111N1LI. TINT, URIIA GRADING PLAN 7 of 7 )ut:blank 7/2/2( Page 18 of THE HIGHLANDS ANNEXATION TO THE TOWN OF MEAD, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO A PARCEL OF CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP: KNOW ALL NMI BY MESE PRESENTS THAT STEILA S GALLEGOS FAIN TRUST AND FETE CALLEGC6. BEING 1HE OYNERs Cr ORTAN LANDS IN NOD COUNTY, COLORADO. HAVE NERE.. PETITIONED TO THE TOWN Of MEAD FOB ANNEXATION OF THE PROPERTY BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS PARCEL 1: P41%,1,4.1 4'1\ ME SOJM IOU 'f.,1? 0 110E MW 7. OF 501.11001 10. 10M15MP M NEST 0 TOE P.M., 00)8410 OF WED, STATE OF COLORADO EXCEPTING THOSE PARCELS 029011 D 8Y DEEDS RECORDED SEPTEMBER 112005 AT RECEPTION NO 332]046 AND MY 5 2017 AT RECEPTION NO. 4310144. NOW ,31701.4AS LOT S RECORDED EXEMPTION M. 1201 -10 -2 -RE -2574, RECORDED NOVEMBER 16. 2000 Al RECEPTIONNO 2607249. LOCATED 01 O THE MW 6 1C1g9 TO. TOE.. 3 NORTH. RANGE 66 REST Of 184E 6TH P.Y.. COUNEE 0 WELD. STATE OF COLORADO. A PARCEL O LAO LOCATED M 111E NORTHWEST QUARTER 00 SECTION ICE TOM80419 3 NORM. RAM. 66 WEST OF ME 6111 PN0000 NRIOIAN, WEIR COUNTY, COLORADO NO BONG MN PARTICULARLY DESCEND AS FOLLOWS 0URE8NCMG AT TN REV 9ATEENM CONNER OF SAID NORTHWEST 14 OF SECTOR THENCE NORM W].T'w• PEST, A DISTANCE O 29.91 FEEL ...VW HEST TJNE O SECTION 10. THENCE NORM B99T2{• EAST, A INSTANCE 030.00 FEET TO ME BON. OF BEGINNING THENCE NO NORTH 00'x}'9{' EAST. A DISTANCE O 30221 FEET. THENCE NORM 11632'92' EAST. A p5TANCE OF 1729.99 FEET: THENCE NORM 003x'22• EAST. A DISTANCE 0 672.9. 52 FEET. THENCE 50410 58'54'21' EAST, A DISTANCE O '6FEET: THENCE ORM 66'9{'21' 251. A OSTARCE O 2198396 FEET. NO RM O.TH W.04'42' EAST A OVID. 0 3{1.63 REST: THENCE SOU. 04'0390" MST A 0S 1NAfE O 1{.72 FEET, THENCE SO TH 1211652• EAST A 051ANCR OF 307x2 FEET. 5NCNCE SOUTH B9ro32B' VEST. A psIANE O 301.23 FEET 10 IRE PONT O THE ABOVE THE ABOVE U PACONTAW4 1.90,309 SWAN FEET OR 49.269 ACRES MORE . OR LESS. PARCEL W. AREL Of LAM LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER O SECTION ID 00114111. 3 N AN, RAN. 05 NEST Of THE 6TH 10450PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, WELD COUNTY. CEORADO AM BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS COMMENCING AT IN WEST SOIEENTH CORNER Cs SAID NORTHWEST A O SECTION 0, THENCE NORM 00R3'w' WEST. A DISTANCE 0 25.51 FEET ALONG SAO PEST LINE SEC.. TO MENCNORTH 099314' LAST. A DISTANCE O 30.2 FEET, THENCE NORM 00'23'50• NEST, A OSIAMCE OF 302.29 FEET; THENCE NORTH 663CM• EAST, A DISTANCE Cf 172699 FEET TO THE PONI O BEGNIPRNG: THENCE NOR. W23'N .51. A DISTANCE 0 96002 FEEL THENCE HORN 0032'10' EAST. A DISTANCE 0 879.{0 FEEL, THENCE SOUK 00'24'21' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 960.07 HET, 111.. SOUTH 00'52'22' WEST, A OSTANO O S79.52 FEEL 10 NE PONT 0 DECANTING THE ABOVE OESCNIBED PARCEL CONTNNS 644,256 SQUARE FEET OR .9.361 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. OWNER: COUNTY O SS STATE O THE FOREGOER, CERTIFICATE O OMIERSMP WAS AIMOMEDOD BEFORE ME 1.5 NINE55 MY HAM AM OFION SEAL: NOTARY PUBLIC MY COW.. EXPIRES LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE TOWN OF MEAD, WELD COUNTY, STATE OF COLORADO 64.866 ACRES SHEET 1 OF 2 I1 )�` VICINTY MAP NOT TO SCALE GENERAL NOTES: I. BASIS O BEARINGS THE EST WE O IN N.M9E.T DDANIER CC NE HORNIEST QUARTER 0 SECTION 10. TOWNSHIP 3 NORM, RANGE 66 MIST O 1)40 684 P.Y. BEARS 5002543 *, BASED ON THE DEPARTMENT O REGULATORY AGEINCES HO920N10. CONTROL NETWORK AND BRG MONUIENIED BY A FOUND l6 REBAR MN A 2• AL0RNA2 CAP IN RA14. BOX L.S. H0. 28273 AT THE WEST 9XEEENM CORER AMA 29' ALUMNA CM M RARE BOA ES N0. 23600 Al THE NORTHWEST CORNER Of SECTION 10. 2 ACCOROWG TO THE FERAL EMERGENCY IANIA.1 051 AGENCY FLOOD YAP. COMMUNITY PANEL NUMBER 08123018110 MN AN EFFECTIVE DATE 0 TO/ BE/THE6AREA ORIYIPMALL FLOOD 0CT PROPERTY IS A*AR9ATED IN 00130EAZONE X C 0* 501 28 DETERMINED PLAIN. DEAR ROW 3.. M.' TRACCORD.. TO COLORADO LAW. TYCO 16751 RC. AN 41 COMEY LEGAL COON BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY MINDS THREE YEARS AVER 110E THIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT 08 NO EVENT NAY ANY ACTON BASED UPON ANY DEFECT M DEWY TIPS SVEY BE C0WAITS MORE MAN TEN R5 FROM THE COTE OF ME CERTIFICATION SHOWN HENEW. 4. INT PERSON INC 0N0M0. NY KNOWS. ALTERS OR DEFACES ANY PUWC LAND SURVEY MONUIENT OR LANE BOUNDARY MCIUIENT OR ACESSONY COIMII5 A CLASS TWO (2) MININNFATION PURSUANT TO STATE STATUTE IB-4-508, 0 TN COLORADO REVISED STATUTE. 5. 065 LAM SURVEY DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A 1111E SEARCH BY LAN. NAND SURVEYS, LLD. TO .VERMIN( OWMER9M Of TINS PARCEL OF LAO. (OWE THE OSCRIP0ON SNOW. VERIFY THE COPATBILITY OF NIS DESORPTION MM THAT 0 ME ADJACENT PARCELS Of LOUD, HR VERIFY EASEMENTS 0 RECORD. FOR ALL MF0RMATOR REGARDING EASEMENTS MOTET -O -WAY CR TILE or RECORD. LANGE LAND SURVEYS, LIE RELIED UPON COAMIIIENT NO 0 9 2 251 5 411 4 NTH AN EFFECTIVE DATE 0 12-22-2017 AT 9:00 P.M. PREPARED BY CNO 112E GUARANTEE COMPANY 6. INSTANCES ON THIS SURVEY ARE EIPRES0E0 M U.S. SURVEY FEET AND 0ECMA5 1RFAE0- A U.S. SURVEY FOOT IS 0ESOWB 0 AS EOACTET/200/3637 METERS CON TIGuI TY: 10T. BOUNDARY 0 PARCELS - 6.106.11' 1/6 O IOTA PARCEL BOUNDARY I TOTAL CONROPTES TO THE PRESENT TOWN O MEAD m 4.22366 6TH P.M., SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I JONATHAN R. LAN.. A MOVEN., PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYON M RTE STATE OF COLORADO. DO HEREBY CERTIFY TEAT 184E ANREIO1ON YAP SHOWN HEREOF 0 A CORRECT OELYEAMIN OF THE A9051 DESCWBEO PARE. OF LANE AND NAT AT LEAST 0E-44010 (1/6) OF THE PERIPHERAL BOUNDARY 0 SAID PARCEL 15 CONMAJO US TO INC PRESENT BOUNDARY OF ME TONI O MEAL. I TURNER CERTIFY THAT THIS YAP AND LEGAL OESC.PDON SERE PREPARED UNDER 4Y KITSOW. SUPERVISION ON THIS 2000 DAY CF FEBRUARY. 2018. PLANNING COMMISSION_ REVIVED BY NE MEAD PEN11NG C01MSSION NIPS _ DAY O 2016. ATTEST PLANMNG COMY5907N SECRETARY CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES 1485 AMMEXATON NAP Of ME HIGHLANDS ANNEXATION TO THE TOM Of P MEAD IS ANNOYED AND ACCEPTED BY ORDINANCE N0. PASSED AND ADOPTED AI TIE REGULAR N.M. Cr THE BOARD Cr TRUSTEES 0 LEAD, COLORADO. HELD ON 2010 ANO RECORDED ON ASNCEPTION NO M THE RECCE. OF THE CLERK AM RECORDER 01 MELD COUNTY. COLORADO BY RE BORED 0 TRUSTEES 0 MEAD COLORADO ATTEST MAYOR 1UEN ttERE -..--_ CLERK AND RECORDERS CERTIFICATE SIAM 0 COLORADO COUNTY O NUJ ) THIS ANNEXATION MAP WAS 1000 M THE OHM£ 0 THE CLERK NO RECORDER AT O'OOY Y MIS DAY 0 A.O. 2016 R WIDE . RECEPTION M. _. WELD COUNTY CLEF. AM REC0ROER DEPUTY Ss.,. MATE LPmm N .A '- 3"Mi'iYS W -no nut:blank 7/2/2( Page 19 of THE HIGHLANDS ANNEXATION TO THE TOWN OF MEAD, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF fHE 6TH P.M, TOWN OF MEAD, WELD COUNTY, STATE OF COLORADO 64.866 ACRES SHEET 2 OF 2 NCWRIREST CORNER #C..49µ4 i, W W CA, AS MAW -115117 nfiels—�+- NOOVS'A5'E 912 Si (RAE). LIMIMewml POINT Y BEOMNMIG PARCEL I Ne 9nTN E N4773g51WlD 00' '5' POINT (1F COMMENCEMENT I T.-0 Sr AMMON/ CAM c, ro Y 01 ~{ v n �WN h �o r z�8 �ff 30)93' (A4 189'Ho511 YV 30 ( n.rmoirjoarair 589',4'50'? •330_52, .589'44'50"? 595.97 �Km"".W. w' REST QUARTER CORNER mrnav la AL Now 4. AV.M. 1.nm \ \ / NORTH LINE NORTHINEST COUNTY ROAD 36 399"9 r. 9994 AM - N88,2.0212639.4.5' _ I- 00 R.O. iv) R0IYB'59'E 715.23' (A.9.) X02'58'35'? 11518' (800) 5890i'SIYW IA.18' A9. �NBW'N'SO"W 11.8)' REL QUARTER SECTION 10 N88'St'SAR 7,2999 M) 599.57"..E39.00' KC) POINT GE BEGINNING PARCEL n MM MC. FORMERLY PARCEL I LOT 7,087,309 OF 45.485 AC STELLA GALLEG05 PLC NO. 2807299 VALE �MAL RAI110. MUM MOM MN. MEM PL. WM SIM RC Nor — NOR1N QUARTER CC846i11., Mr1 4 — N9913'OO'E !13.97(RE0) _ F I)• ./ //,' i l ul ( I1 i II I' WWWWW 'Arm. lIII lI PARCEL II I I 844.258 SF. I I I 79.381 AC STELLA GALLEGOS REC. NO. 2807299 "1— 1.41.1= 54913'00'* 895.36' (800) 879.52' (A.N.) 9.r,.;((;,/''%i�,,,,�,,,�/,,./„5m'571•s''19/„j/////%(„y/�,(0,�,,,(,,,I (DUO,(,,,//,,,(„/!/,,,/,,,/,,,,/O.(/,,,///,!//,/,.//,,,( 1 „A [----, I I Rz22993ty� 7) I j I � � I rARc2r I, 1 AIQY ESTATES 1 .�.•1u99a`17 A'28' MOO01'(AN.) zi , COWIE ® 309MSION P �,r I REC. A'0 1951801 S 77 SOUTH LINE NORTNIIEST QUARTER SECn0N 10 088'54'19'E 2639.40 CENTER [WARIER CORNER MAW G3 .vYMIIY�M. RS mom 00M) F AAA 30i8949OI0 PIA WC, 4951682 1951801 X013.2. 21'YI 425.15• (A.M.) )ut:blank 7/2/2( Page 20 of THE HIGHLANDS ZONING AMENDMENT MAP A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., TOWN OF MEAD, WELD COUNTY, STATE OF COLORADO 64.866 ACRES SHEET 1 OF 2 CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP, SNOW AL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT STELLA S GALLEGOS FAIRLY TRUST ARID PETE GALLEG05. BEING THE OMENS O CERTAIN LANDS W RELD COU911. COLORA00, OSTNRVO AS 1py0W5, EXCEPT FOR PUBLIC 640X15 -O -MAY. PARCEL r: NE NORM k OF Mf M 100 ROSS O f NM IL O gCON I0. IgN4N S NORM. R 38 HEST O NE 114 P.Y., CORK OF YEID, StAIE O COLORADO EXCEPTING NOSE PARCELS CONVEYED BY DEEDS RECORDED SEPTEMBER 15.2005 T RECEPTION N0. 3323096 AD ALLY 5. 2O] AT RECEPTION NO. 4515144. NOW AAOBN AS LOT B. RECORDED (4EYPIIU4 N0. 120] -10 -2 -RE -25]9, RECORDED KNE WER 16, 200D Al RECEPTION NO 2801299. LOCATED N NI NW A OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 60 VEST O 1440 8TH PA., COUNTY O MELD. STATE O COLORADO. A PARCEL O LAND LOCATED IN ME NORTHWEST QUARTER O SECTOR 10, TOWNSHIP 3 4406TH, RANGE bb BEST O NE 810 PRINCIPE MERIDIAN. WELD COUNTY. COLORADO AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS POLLENS COMMENCING AT THE VEST SIXTEENTH COMER O SAID NORTHWEST A O SECTION O. THENCE HORN 00.2344' VEST. A INSTANCE O 25.51 FEET KONG SAID NEST UNE O SECT., 10. THENCE NORTH 899]'24' EAST, A DISTANCE O .1000 FELT TO THE PONT O THEYNCE KINN 825'54' 1. A DISTANCEDISTANCEO 302.28 FEET, MACE NORTH 66851'52' EAST. A DISTANCE Cf 814. 2➢ FEE,: THENCE NORTH 0004'21' EAST. A DISTANCE OF 821.48 FEET: THENCE 50UTH 0021'21' EAST, A INSTANCE O 2293. FEET.E THENCE SOUTH 0024'22' BEST, A DI5TARCE OF 348336 FEET: THENCE NORM 0024'40' EAST. A DISTANCE O 541153 PET,; MEND SOUTH 020T50' NEST, A INSTANCE O 14..2 FEEL: THENCE NORM 728' EAST, A DISTANCE O l, IJ5.22 FEEL THENCE OT16' NEST, A DISTANCE 5TANCE ]0]41 FEET TO 114E POINT OF Ni BEGINNING, 88 B9 ME ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL CONTAINS 1.951.309 SQUARE FEET OR 15.46 ACRES. MORE OR LESS. PARCEL u. A PARCEL O LAND LOCATED IN E HORNIEST GOIE4 O SECTION 10. TOM94P TERN, I 3 N, RAKN8 E VEST AN T OF THE 601 PRINCIPAL 4E6OAN. MELO CQUNTY. COLORADO AND 8ENG INNS PART0AA8L1 DESCRIBED AS F0LL00 COMMENCING Al THE WEST 64440415 GONER O SAID NORTHWEST 1! O SEC110N i4. KENO NORTH 002.304' MIST. A DISTANCE OF 25.51 FEET ALONG SAID NEST LINE OF .C11OI 10 THENCE NORTH 8992'24' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET, THENCE NORTH 0023'54' NEST. A DISTANCE OF 502.28 FEET. NODE! NORTH 651'54" EAST. A DISTANCE O 1]2999 FEET 10 1110 90911 O BEONNING; THENCE NORTH 0024'54' NEST. A PSTANCE O 960.02 FEED. THENCE NORTH 0852'14' EAST. A DISTANCE O 629.40 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 00.24'21' EAST. A DISTANCE O 960.0] FEET, THENCE SOUTH 56'5'2'22' WEST. A INSTANCE O 628.5'1 FEET 10 THE PONE O EIN0NG: THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL CONTAINS 044.256 SQUARE FEET OR 18.381 ACRES MORE OR LESS. HAVE LAD Wt SOS IOW. AMENDMENT YAP O THE ABOVE DESCRIBED LAND UNDER TIE NAT[ AND 51111 O THE NKNLAD4 104E GRANGE N ZONING SHALL OE FREE 114E E0S11NG ZONING O AGNEULTINE 10 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED RTMSNEN11K AN ZONING 84 ACCORDANCE NITH 114E REOURED ENIS O O ARTICLE 16, E MEAD MUNE*. CCM NUS DESCRIBED ZONING AMENDMENT 10ETYAP CORTE. 0625.%] SQUARE FEET OR 64866 ACRES. MORE LESS, TOGHER an,AND SUBECI TO All EASDENT5 AO RIOITS-O -WAY 0051190 AND/OR O PUBLIC RECO. EXECUTED THIS DAY O 2018, OMEN. COUNTY O SLATE O _ SS THE FOREGO,. CERIMICAIE O OWERSFUP WAS ACKNOVAEDGEU BEFORE ME MIS DAY O . 20_ MINE55 MT HAND AND CADGE SEAL. NOTARY PUBLIC Yv COIM159W CANNES: VICiNTY MAP NOT ro SCALE GENERAL NOTES: T BASIS Cl BEAR24051 114E VEST UNE O THE NORMBEST QUARTER O ME HORNIEST DUARTER O SECTION 10, 14'2191 3 NORTH, RANGE 6 VEST Of THE 614 P. BEARS 10024'04'8. BASED ON 10E DEPARTMENT Of REGULATORY I,'ENDES HORIZONTE COHNO NETWAIN AND BEND BO4UBENIED BY A FOUND F RERAN MN A 2' RUINER, CAR N RM. BOX L5. NO 262]3 AT NE NEST 9AMENTH CERRO MO A 2.5' RU,IUY CAP N RANGE BOX 0.5 N0. 23500 At ME NORTHWEST CORNER O SECTION 10. 2 ACCORDING TO NE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY 10000 MAP. COMMUNITY PANE. METER 06123C1880E MN AN EFFECTIVE DATE O 01TO B/2018. THE ME AREA O FIMYCT41 FLOOD HAZARD OUTSIDEPROPER. IS LOCATED IN AZQIE Of THEX AREA 100 -YEAR DETERMINED LO U� PENN. W 4,, NOTICE 0000RDING 10 COLORADO LAW, W MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL C110N BASED UPON ANY DEFECT N 1H15 SURVEY WARN TWEE YEARS AFTER YOU ROST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. 64 NO EVENT MAY MIT 0TDN BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THE SURVEY BE COMMENCED 4960 MAN 1EN YEARS FROM 111E DATE O 101E CERIEICATEVI 314004 HEREON ♦ PERSON W10 KNOWNGLT REMOVES. ALTERS OP DEFACES ANY POBUC LARD 54.NET MONUMENT OR LAND BOUNDARY 8018AENT OR ACCESSORY COMMITS A CLASS TWO (2) 4050EYEA40R PURSUANT TO STATE STATUTE 6_4.506. Of NE WIDRAOO REVISED STATUTE. 5. THIS LAND SIANVEY DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A TITLE SEARCH BY LADE LAND SURVEYS, U.C. TO DETERMINE OWNERSHIP O MIS PARCEL Cr LAND, VERIFY TIE DESCRIPTION SHOWN, ALLEY THE 00LPA1181UTY O NIS DESCRIPTION 0TH THAT O THE ADJACENT PARCELS O LAND. DR VERIFY EASEMENTS O RECORD OR ALL NFORNATDN 8ECARONC EASEIENT5, RIGHT -OF -11101 OR TITLE O RECORD, LAND LAND SURVEYS. LLC RELIED UPON 0084141IEN1 NO 4822515471• AIN A EFFECTIVE DATE O 12-22-201] AT 5.00 P.M. PREPARED BY LAND TIM GUARANTEE COMPANY. 6. DISTANCES O4 1185 SURVEY ARE EXPRESSED N 3.5. SURVEY FEET AND DECIMALS THEREOF . A U.S. %REEY FOOT IS DESCRIBED AS EXACTLY 1200/395] METERS. SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE JONATHAN R. LANGE, A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR IN 114E STATE Cf COLORADO, DO HEREBY CERTIFY NAT THE 20050 AMENDMENT MAP SHONE HEREIN IS A CORRECT DEk9NU1144 O THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL Cf LAND. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THIS YAP AND REGAL DESCRIPTION NEAE PREPARED UNDER MY PERSONAL 4,8808VI90N ON 1155 23RD OAT OF FEBRUARY. 2018. PLANNING COMMISSION RENE.) BT iNf MEAD PLANNING COIMISSOI MI5 DAY Of . 2018 ATTEST: CHAIRMAN PLANING COMMISSION SECRETARY CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES THIS ZONING RAP Of THE MGULAO5 N THE TONI O ME. IS APPROVED AND OPTED BY 0DINANCE 140 PASSED AND ADOPTED T ME REGULAR KONG OF TIE BOARD O TRUSTEES O MEAD. COLORADO. HELD ON __-_.-- , 2018 AIO RECORDED CN AS RECEPTION NO . M THE RECORDS O ME CLERK AND RECORDER O WEE. COUNTY, COLORADO 8Y THE 440042ND O TRUSTEES O MEAD COLORADO ATTEST: MAYOR TARN 0.0 CLERK AND RECORDERS CERTIFICATE STATE O COLORADO )M. COUNTY O VELD ) THIS ZONING MAP WAS FLIED IN NE OFFICE O THE CLENR AND RECORDER AT OCLO00 N. 1005 DAY Of A. 2018. N 60010 _ . PALE _ . NAP . 96/011100 NO VELD COUNTY CLERK ARO RECORDER DEPUTY L 00008 CL Lana S Surveys AmW.M-MW ..mg AWAIGA OAR WOW IL PAW MnvW fAL 04.1 __0( sr� —EfiFT04 )ut:blank 7/2/2( Page 21 of THE HIGHLANDS ZONING AMENDMENT MAP A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., TOWN OF MEAD, WELD COUNTY, STATE OF COLORADO 64.866 ACRES SHEET 2 OF 2 P0817 Of A L I ' x6V°W 25 5 N00"1]5,' b WW 151' POINT CO COMMENCEMENTM L1• < IR XIAJJ NEST QUARTER CORNER SCAM w mCAP, 31700 Rut ON AID At a \ / NOR INKIEST CORNER .0.. �. RS LOGO NORTH LINE NOR THA£5T QUARTER SECTION 10 N8852'02E 2639.43' NPVIL VALE VIEW FINAL PLAY 1 °1"°1 ° REC. NO. 2691805 NINTH QUART R CO ILEI4.0 IA /LAWN C.V. ILS MOW 4.08,74 roOnv «01'A6'Mli 115.22' /o025a'w'E lisle' (REc) 589VY50'* ,1.i6' 16.M.) 069'4'50•* 1A.9i' (REC) COl/NTY ROAD 8 38 p99N RA9e l ur Man ... .I0) ..) I' aln• Rum Moe >0 Wm WADI Dara. tat POINT OF BEGINNING PARCEL owes pr/0 PEASIK STELLA GALLEGOS REC. NO. 2807299 ZONING A--AO%CUL TURAL WOO COUNTY PROPOSED ZONING RSF-1 IONN CE MEAD newair AlLITROM 175.17 STELLA GALLEGOS { 11 REC. NO. 2807299 j I ZONING A-AGRICUL WOOL L HELD COUNTY 5a91SW'* 68536' KC 566'52'2Yo 619.32'(«,Y) si/-�nw.o !WON V(4;1.; 014 26' F 6,1013000 6)3.91' (REC) �999DYroT 979.40' (N0) I Thu Nu v 0 v 9N—...iNT a� �-H,444 •Ofil EI II 4- w, i COYOTE RUN 008039°4 FINAL. PLAY REC. NO. 2953802 N'3ffi I / COlOR vlerRSION FAA PIM' NEC NO 2%1602 1 1 R0o'2C211Y p 1 7 PEA TNER RIDGE ESTATES FIN PLAT S2S.1S (A.N,) 29].96 NN.) ++ REC NO. 1 I c- I: i rtr I a I I Is I I w I st i l l 24669,040 4__: In 1f I 1 II 1 SOUTH LINE NOR TNNEST QUARTER SECTION 10 N88'54.19*E 2639.40' CENTER QUARTER CORNER ra La NAM. Wa 1 05 IMIIMIT MN= • ▪ maw urn PIM= DM 1 ...AS !WWI; Wino] MD LOU._ 1T1 Dilimaig• IOU]. ▪ Valn 0,126 raui 0.0MOITY Lee MOP CI DM DK N 4 SCALE: I' - 120. a* L Lange and GS Suanm M(MO Uri Nq +Nrru DAN %AVID b *1Ax p9NN )ut:blank 7/2/2( Page 1 c Annexation Assessment For The Highlands Prepared for The Town of Mead, CO May, 2018 )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 2 c Annexation Impact Assessment Report General Site Location and Description The Highlands (Site) is located in unincorporated Weld County and is bound on the north by County Road 36 (CR 36), on the west by County Road 7 (CR 7), on the east by Coyote Run Subdivision and on the south by Feather Ridge Estates. The property is located in the Northwest Corner of Section 10, Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6' P.M. The 64.9 -acre development will consist of single family detached homes, open lands and parks. Water The Highlands property is located within the Little Thompson Water District (LTWD). A Preliminary Utility Report will be included with the subsequent Preliminary Plat submittal which will assess the impacts of the proposed development. The LTWD has existing water infrastructure running along the Site boundaries and is believed to have adequate pressure to supply the proposed demands. The point of connections will likely occur in CR 7, CR 36 and Hughes Drive but will ultimately be determined by the LTWD. The applicant has obtained is a 'will serve' from LTWD and is included with the annexation application. Sewer The Highlands property is proposed to be served by the Town of Mead Sanitation plant. A Preliminary Utility Report will be included with the subsequent Preliminary Plat submittal which will assess the impacts of the proposed development on the current plant. Natural Gas The natural gas provider of the Site will be Xcel Energy. The applicant has contacted Xcel Energy and requested a 'w/1/ serve' letter for the proposed Site. The 'will serve' letter will be obtained prior to the completion of the annexation. Electric The electric service to the Site will be provided by United Power. The applicant has contacted United Power and has received a 'will serve' letter for the proposed Site. Telephone The telephone and communication systems will be provided by Century Link. The applicant has contacted the Century Link representative and has requested a 'will serve' letter for the proposed Site. The 'will serve' letter will be obtained prior to the completion of annexation. Streets The Highlands property will access both County Road 7 and County Road 36 with full movement access points. Per the Traffic Impact Study that has been prepared and included with this annexation, no improvements to these roads are being proposed outside of the connections themselves. Drainage The existing topography of The Highlands has a north -south drainage way that bisects the property with both The east and west portions draining in its direction. There are no FEMA mapped floodplains within its boundaries. The existing property primarily consists of agricultural land without improvements. The existing slopes generally range from one to approximately 5 percent along the drainage paths that release offsite. Historically, runoff generated from the site ultimately reaches the St. Vrain River. The Highlands Annexation Impact Assessment May 24, 2018 )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 3 a A Preliminary Drainage Report will be included with the Preliminary Plat and will include historic release rates, detention pond sizing and discussion of the hydrologic characteristics and drainage patterns Law Enforcement The Highlands property is currently under the protection of the Weld County Sheriff's Department Upon annexation, law enforcement will be provided by the Town of Mead which currently provides police protection services to the adjacent developments of Coyote Run and Feather Ridge Estates Fire Protection The proposed Site is located within the Mountain View Fire District which currently provides fire protection services to the adjacent developments of Coyote Run and Feather Ridge Estates Parks and Open Space The proposed parks and open lands areas are consistent with the Town of Mead Design Standards, maintaining a minimum of 20% open area, with the current site plan achieving approximately 24% open area The total open area requirement for The Highlands site is a minimum of 12 98 acres Environmental Considerations The proposed Site does not appear to inhabit endangered species or show obvious signs of inhabitance, nor does it appear that wetlands are present An environmental assessment has been completed and is included with this application The Highlands Annexation Impact Assessmem May 24, 2018 )ut blank 6/29/2( Page 1 c Town of Mead 441 Third Street P.O. Box 626 Mead, CO 80542 970-5354477 www.townofinead.org LAND USE APPLICATION PAGE TNN O MUST BE SIGNED AND NOTARIZED Project/Business Name The Highlands Project Addre.-s South of WCR 36, East of WCR 7, north of Feather Ridge Subdivision and west of Coyote Run J Project Descri tion Annexation and Zoning Amendment from A-1 to RSF-4 PUD of 64.86 acres for J P 220 single family detached homes, parks, trails and open space. Legal Description (Provide Subdivision, Lot #, Block # or Attach Metes and Bounds) See Attached metes and bounds Legal Description Owner Name/Company (Attach Separate Sheets if Multiple) Stella S. Gallegos Family Trust Contact Person ( If Different) Joe Stifter, Prosper Land and Development, LLC (Applicant) Address/City/State/Zip 418 Kimbark Street, Longmont, CO 80501 Phone 303-955-2493 Email joe@prosperlanddev.com Fax Authorized Representative Name/CompanyKaren Henry, Henry Design Group, Inc Add ress/C its i State/Zip 1501 Wazee Street, Suite 1-C7 Denver, CO 80202 Phone 303-446-2368 Email khenry@henrydesigngrooupcorn Fax Land Use Application Form 08/09 Page l of 2 )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 2 c Mineral Rights On tier/Lease Hokin- Name/Company (Attach Separate Sheets if Multiple) See Attached Address/City/State/Zip Set ice Pro' itlt't-s Gas Xcel Water Little Thompson Water District Electric United Sewer Town of Mead Metro District TBD Fire Mountain View Fire Protection District Land l se information Current Zoning Weld County Agriculture (A) Proposed Zoning Residential Single Family -4 (RSF-4)PUD Acres 64.86 # Lots/Units Proposed 220 Density (DU/Acre) 3.39 The undersigned is fully aware of the requestiproposal being made and the actions being initiated on the referenced property. The undersigned understand that the application must be found to be complete by the Town of Mead before the request can officially be accepted and the development review process initiated. The undersigned is aware that the applicant is fully responsible for all reasonable costs associated with the review of the application/request being made to the Town of Mead. Applicants shall pay all costs billed by the Town for legal, engineering and planning costs incurred by staff, including consultants acting on behalf of staff, necessary for project review. By this acknowledgement, the undersigned hereby certify that the above information is true and correct. Owner: Owner: Applicant: Date: Date: �--� Date: g`4 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of eltiU! &er ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this l } day of by �ce SMer My commission expires: 5- Di - Q‘ Witness my hand and official seal. SHAN', ON N ENGLER Note", Public State o4 Colorado Notary ID * 201 74013294 My Commission E*osres 03-27.2021 U fly . 20 k.$ . Stet/SA-Mtn �t Notary Public Land Use Application Form 08/09 Page 2of2 )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 1 c THE EIENRY DESIGN GROUP I AND Pt ANN?ti{, • I ANDSCAPt ARf.Nt1 Et TURF R DESIGN May 14, 2018 Mr. Christopher Kennedy Town of Mead, Planning and Zoning Department 441 Third Street PO Box 626 Mead, CO 80542 RE: The Highlands Dear Mr. Kennedy, This letter is in reference to the following proposed applications to the Town of Mead for The Highlands Development • Annexation to the Town of Mead • Zoning Amendment from Weld County A to RSF-4 (PUD) Including Preliminary and Final Development Plans • Preliminary and Final Plat The owner of record, The Stella S. Gallegos Family Trust and Richard Romeo, Personal Representative of the Estate of Pete Gallegos, also known as Perfecto Gallegos, Deceased, is fully aware and supportive of these requests, and hereby authorizes the following: Applicant. Engineering Representative: Planning Representative: Joe Stifter, Prosper Land and Development, Lk. Bonner Gilmore, Enertia Consulting Group, LLC Karen Henry, Henry Design Group, Inc. to act on their behalf for these submittals to the Town of Mead for the above stated applications. The owner attests to the representations made in this letter as indicated by the notarized signature below Best Regards, Karen Z. Henry Principal The Stella S. Gallegos Family Trust and Richard Romeo, Personal Representative of the Estate of Pete Gallegos, also k s Perfecto Gallegos, Deceased By: Date G 'l •a Richard E. Romeo Title: Personal Representative of the Estate of Pete Gallegos, a/so known as Perfecto Gallegos, Deceased, and as Trustee of the Stella S. Galle. os Farm/ Trust State of Colorado County of exu Lbase Subscribed and swor•1�before me this l da of i Y Notary Fu blLt } }SS seteraenera LEIGH TIJCMN NOTARY PUBLIC S TArE OF COLORADO NOTARY Io 20144040916 MY CCMMIw3ION EXPIRES OCTOBER 20, 2.013 talk_My Commission expires / Q ujl( '1 )ut:hlank 6/29/20 Pasze 1 THE HENRY DESIGN GROUP May 24, 2018 The Board of Trustees c/o Mr Gary Shields, Mayor Town of Mead, Colorado 441 Third Street Mead, Colorado 80542 RE: The Highlands Letter of Intent to Annex Ladies and Gentlemen of the Board, On behalf of The Stella S. Gallegos Family Trust and Richard Romeo, Personal Representative of the Estate of Perfecto Gallegos, Deceased, the owner of the property; and Prosper Homes and Development, LLC, the applicant of The Highlands, we respectfully request annexation into the Town of Mead. The site is a total of 64.866 acres and is located south of County Road 36 and east of County Road 7, north of Feather Ridge Subdivision and west of the Coyote Run neighborhood. The parcel is generally described as being located in a part of the North Half of Section 16, Township 3 North, Range 68 West, of the 6. PM, Weld County, Colorado. The property is identified in the growth plans for the Town of Mead, and the Future Land Use Plan designates the site, and surrounding area, as Residential Single Family - 4 (RSF-4f) District. In addition to the application for annexation, a request for Zoning Assignment of the property of RSF-4 (PUD). We believe the initial zoning as proposed is consistent with the Vision and Character as defined in the Town of Mead Comprehensive Plan (Adoption Draft March 2018 Thank you for your time and consideration of this land use proposal and we look forward to working with the Town on this development. Please feel free to contact Joe Stifter at Proper Land and Development at 720-471-6235 if you have any questions or need additional information. Respectfully, tau 4ttesa.a4 Karen Z. Henry, Principal Applicant's Representative )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 1 c THE HENRY DESIGN GROUP LAND PLANNING • LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN May 24, 2018 Mr. Christopher Kennedy, Planning Director Town of Mead 441 Third Street Mead, CO 80542 RE: THE HIGHLANDS ANNEXATION AND ZONING Dear Mr Kennedy, On behalf of Prosper Land and Development, the applicant, we are pleased to submit the enclosed application for Annexation and Zoning for the 64.86 -acre property known as the Highlands. The proposed Annexation meets all regulatory requirements and the Zoning is in conformance with the Town's Comprehensive Plan and the RSF-4 PUD proposed Zoning, and the Town of Mead Land Use Code. The following narrative provides a detailed description of the Annexation and Zoning application. 1. PROJECT TEAM Applicant/Developer Prosper Land and Development, LLC 428 Kimbark Street Longmont, CO 80501 p. 303-955-2493 joe(cQprosperlanddev.com Civil Engineer: Bonner Gilmore 1529 Market Street, Suite 200 Denver, CO 80202 303-875-7131 bonner.gilmore(c0enertiacg.com 2 PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION Planner/Landscape Architect: Henry Design Group, Inc. 1501 Wazee Street, Suite 1-C Denver, CO 80202 p. 303-446-2368 khenry(d2henrydesigngroup.com The parcel of land is located south of County Road 36 and east of County Road 7, north of Feather Ridge Subdivision and west of the Coyote Run neighborhood. The site is generally described as located in a part of the North Half of Section 16, Township 3 North, Range 68 West, of the 6th PM, Weld County, Colorado. )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 2 c 3. EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS The site is generally a farm field with slightly rolling topography in the 0% to 5% slope range. Over the years, the property has been used for crop production. The only significant site feature is the drainage corridor in the eastern portion of the site. A Town's sanitary sewer main is in the drainage corridor. No improvements are proposed in the drainageway except for a trail connection. There are no structures on the site nor are there any features of historical significance. 4. GENERAL DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION The Highlands PUD consists of approximately 64.86 acres, designated as Residential Single Family -4 (RSF-4) according to the Town of Mead Comprehensive Plan. This project is being proposed as a single family detached home neighborhood within the Town of Mead, including parks, trails and open space. The proposal is to annex the site into the Town of Mead ad rezone the site from Weld County A to RSF-4 with a PUD Overlay for the entire site. Adjacent land uses consist of existing suburban single family detached homes to the east and south, and large lot residential to the north. Vacant land and large lot residential is to west of the site. The existing landscape is native grasses and weeds that have returned after farming operations ceased. The development intent for The Highlands is to support the long-term goals of the Town of Mead by offering 220 new single-family homes where infrastructure is in close proximity and community services can be easily be provided, thereby contributing to the growth of the Town in a responsible manner. Parks, trails and open space corridors are a key component of The Highlands. Pocket parks are located strategically to serve homes in the immediate area and provide key focal points. These public spaces also aid in creating neighborhood blocks and circulation patterns. The pocket parks and are connected through open space trail corridors which ultimately lead to the central neighborhood park. The parks will provide both active and passive recreational facilities for the residents. The development plan will provide opportunities for a pedestrian friendly environment with trails within the neighborhood, as well as connections to the surrounding community via the regional trail system. The street layout forms an interconnected system in a modified grid pattern. The orientation of the streets is designed to emphasize the focal points of the neighborhood such as open spaces and parks. The neighborhood streets are proposed for two travel lanes, parking on both sides of the street and a detached sidewalk with street trees in the tree lawn. Landscaping is indicated on the Conceptual Landscape Plan included with the PUD Plan. Entrances to the neighborhood and the park are highlighted with enhanced landscaping creating a sense of arrival into the neighborhood. Native landscape with low water requirements is proposed for the trail corridors and open space tracts. Landscape buffers are provided along County Roads 36 and 7. Page 2 of 4 The Highlands Annexation and Zoning May 24, 2018 nit:blank 6/29/2( Page 3 c 5. CONSISTENCY WITH TOWN'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The Draft Mead Comprehensive Plan dated March 2018 has been utilized as a guide to future development. The following analysis of consistency is based on the updated plan draft dated March 2018. LLR The above plan indicates the Future Land Use Map designation for the site is RSF-4 designation which allows for a maximum density of 4 dwelling units per acre. The proposal is for 3.39 dwelling units per acres and meets the location, use and characteristic criteria in the following manner: • The site is in near commercial uses and public facilities • Access is to adjacent community collectors which are in close proximity to the Town's downtown core • The proposed neignborhood will provide trail connections to nearby existing regional and local trail systems • The planned neighborhood blends into the fabric of the surrounding thereby reinforcing and promoting stable and well -established neighborhood • Two primary lots sizes are proposed which will provide on lot outdoor living space and adequate space for homes with two and three car garages. Seven Vision themes are established in the Comprehensive Plan. With each theme, goals, policies arid strategies create the shared community visions. The Highlands neighborhood meets many aspects of the Community Vision as follows: • Small Town Community Character.- The Highlands is located near the core of Town of Mead thereby enhancing the Town's vitality with new residents. Although a new neighborhood, the design standards and character established long ago within the Town will be maintained. • friend/y Neighborhoods The Highlands will provide homes for families desiring to live in a safe, friendly, community with a small-town feel. A variety of home sizes, styles and prices that will be attractive to working families, young professionals and seniors who enjoy a ranch style homes • Strong Connectivity.- The vehicular network of roads is well established in the vicinity of The Highlands. However, the opportunity exists to further enhance pedestrian and vehicular connectivity. Trails are proposed throughout the neighborhood that will connect to the existing and proposed regional trail system at the southeast edge of the site and to the north. A sidewalk/trail will be Page 3 of 4 The Highlands Annexation and Zoning May24 2018 )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 4 c constructed along County Road 7 that will connect to the trail on the south side of Feather Ridge Subdivision. This trail also ties into the regional system. The walk along County Road 7 will provide safe access to the core of Town. • Dynamic Parks, Recreation and Open Space. The Highlands proposes a series of pocket parks in close proximity of all homes and a neighborhood park for destination family outings. The parks are connected by the internal trail system which connect to the regional system. The parks vary in size and provide both passive and active recreational amenities. Each park has at least one street frontage to keep "eyes" on the park to promote a safe and healthy recreational environment. • An Expansive Natural and Agrarian Setting: Part of maintaining this vision is connectivity and environmental stewardship. The Highlands will promote environmental sustainability by limited water use in both the homes and in the landscape. Common area landscaping will utilize water wise techniques and the homes will be equipped with low flow fixtures. Energy efficiency is also a feature in the homes. • Thoughtful Community Planning, Facilities and Services. New homes and residents will provide additional tax dollars, and the developer/builder will pay fees to both the Town of Mead and special districts further contributing to the financial health of the service providers to offset the cost of new development. The HOA/Metro District will maintain internal parks and trails lessening the burden on the Town to provide these services. Overall, proposed Annexation and Rezoning to RSF-4 PUD Plat is in compliance with the Town's Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Code. The neighborhood is planned in a compatible and sensitive manner and open space, parks and trail connections are provided throughout the neighborhood enforcing the goal of an interconnected community. Thank you for your time and efforts in reviewing The Highlands Annexation and Zoning. We believe the neighborhood will be an asset to the Town and look forward to continuing to work with the Town to see this unique neighborhood to fruition. Respectfully submitted, lfratat Karen Z. Henry, Principal Page 4 of 4 The Highlands Annexation and Zoning May 24, 2018 )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 1 0 Town of Mead 441 Third Street P.U. Box 626 Mead, CO 80542 970-535-4477 www.townofinead.org, AGREEMENT FOR PAYMENT OF REVIEW AND DEVELJOPNIENT EXPENSES INCURRED BY THE TOWN THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of , A.D. 20_, by and between the TOWN OF MEAD, COLORADO, a municipal Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "the Town," andjfrsp`-T vlt , hereinafter referred to as "the Owner/Developer;" cw7`Dt.vtio, ••*r L GC, WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Owner/Developer owns of certain property situated in the County of Weld, State of Colorado, and legally described as follows, to -wit: WHEREAS, the developmen: process included all aspects of land use including but not limited to annexation, subdivision, change of land use and the installation of public improvements; and WHEREAS, the Owner/Developer desires to develop said property and has made application to the Board of Trustees of the Town of Mead for approval of Annexation and Zoning Amendment and WHEREAS, the Parties hereto recognize that the cash deposits and non-refundable land use fees as specified by the Municipal Code of the Town of Mead may not be adequate to fully cover the Town's expenses in considering the referenced application, including, but not limited to, legal publications, planning services, engineering services, attorney fees, consultant fees, reproduction of material, public hearing expenses and recording documents; and WHEREAS, the Parties hereto recognize that the Town will continue to incur expenses throughout the entire development process until final completion of the development project; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual promises and conditions hereinafter contained, it is hereby agreed as follows - 1. FULL AND SEPARATE ACCOUNTING OF REVIEW AND DEVELOPMENT EXPENSES. The Town will maintain separate accounts of all monies collected and expended as a result of the review of the above referenced application throughout the development process. Monthly statements of expenses incurred and the balance remaining in the account will be made available to the Owner/Developer by the Town Agreement for Payment of Review Expenses Page 1 of 3 )ut:hlank 6/29/2( Page 2 c 2. EXPENDITURE OF FEES PAID BY THE OWNER/DEVELOPER. The Town shall expend the monies collected from the Owner/Developer in the form of land use fees and cash deposits, in the payment of expenses incurred in processing the Owner/Developer's request, throughout the development process until final completion of the project. Expenses shall include, but not limited to, fees charged to the Town for legal publications, planning services, engineering services, attorney services, consultant services, reproduction of material, public hearing expenses, the securing of permits and easements and the recording of documents. Any cash deposits held by the Town and not expended, will be refunded to the Owner/Developer, without interest, upon completion or termination of the project. 3 PAYMENT OF REVIEW AND OTHER EXPENSES BY THE OWNER/DEVELOPER. In the event that the Town incurs expenses for the review of the Owner/Developer's request, greater than the monies collected from the Owner/Developer in the form of land use fees and cash deposits, the Owner/Developer shall reimburse the Town for the additional expenses. In the event that the cash deposit drops below one half of the required deposit, the Owner/Developer shall replenish the cash deposit to its full amount. Said reimbursement and/or replenishment shall be made within ten (10) days of the Town submitting an invoice for the expenses, or a demand for the replenishment of the cash deposit. Failure by the Owner/Developer to pay within the specified time shall be cause for the Town to cease processing the application, or deny the Owner/Developer of the right to appear before Planning Commission or the Board of Trustees, or deny approval of the application, or withhold the issuance of building permits or certificates of occupancy. 4. APPLICATION TERMINATION. Except where the law or an agreement with the Town provides otherwise, the Owner/Developer may terminate his application at any time by giving written notice to the Town. The Town shall immediately take all reasonable steps necessary to terminate the accrual of costs to the Owner e.g., notify newspapers to cancel publications, etc. The Owner/Developer will continue to be liable for all costs reasonably incurred by the Town to terminate the application. 5 COLLECTION OF FEES AND COSTS. If the Owner/Developer fails to pay the fees required herein when due, the Town may take those steps necessary and authorized by law to collect the fees due, including but not limited to, filing a lien against the property of the Owner/Developer. The Town shall also be entitled to all court and attorney's fees, other costs incurred in collection and interest on the amount due at the rate of 18% per annum. 6. PERSONAL GUARANTY. In the event the Owner/Developer is a LLC, the Owner/Developer agrees that this is a personal guaranty by the Managers of the LLC for the payment of the review and other expenses 7 ORIGINAL COUNTERPARTS. This Agreement may be executed as counterparts, each of which wil be an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. Agreement for Payment of Review Expenses Page 2 of 3 )ut:blank 6/2912( Page 3 c : I IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Town and the Owner/Developer have caused this Agreement to be duly executed on the day and year first above written. By this acknowledgment, the undersigned hereby agreed to be bound by the terms and conditions of this agreement. (Signature Instructions: Add additional signature lines and notary certificates for each signature as may be necessary.) TOWN OF MEAD OWNER/DEVELOPER Prosper Land and Development, LLC Corporate name if applicabl By By Helen Migchelbrink, Town Manager STATE OF COLORADO )SS. COUNTY OF :i;' S'FrF2 el'n'D A V4e4rtit Of Tel ens iefi-I41.4t1a eV? pf v.fi l op,.y r The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 by as Town Manager of the Town of Mead. My commission expires: Witness my hand and official seal. STATE OF COLORADO ) )ss. COUNTY OF Notary Public The fore oin instrument was acknowledged before me this 15} 9day of c.Su n Q, 20 nr by Joe Sk4er as Lance, bevd09t4en1- Manc er My commission expires: 3-017a a 0 at Witness my hand and official seal. aLWAIL611 � a Notary Pulic SHANNON N ENGLER Notary Public State of Colorado Notary ID if 20174013294 My Commission Expires 03-27-2021 Agreement for Payment of Review Expenses Page 3 of 3 )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 1 of Town of Mead 441 Third Street P.O. Box 626 970-535-4477 Mead, CO 80542 www.townofmead.org ANNEXATION TECHNICAL C RITERIA FORM Project Name The Highlands Project Address and Legal Description See Attached Date Submitted May 24, 2018 Fees Submitted $2,500 Please provide the following to the Town Clerk with this checklist form. For additional information, refer to 16-8-101 through 16-8-109 of the Mead Town Code. X X X X X X X X X X X 1. Five (5) paper copies of the complete annexation application package in D -ring binders. 2. All maps, legal descriptions and surrounding property owner information on 3 CDs. 3. Land Use Application Form, including certification of ownership. 4. Fee Agreement and Deposit. 5. Surrounding and Interested Property Ownership Report. 6. Letter of Intent to Annex. 7. Annexation Petition. The applicant shall submit a petition for annexation complying with the requirements of C.R.S. § 31-12-107. The Town's standard form petition shall be utilized. The petition shall contain the following statements: An allegation that it is desirable and necessary that the area be annexed to the municipality. An allegation that eligibility requirements and limitations have been met or addressed respectively. An allegation that the petitioners comprise the land owners of more than fifty (50) percent of the territory included in the proposed annexation area (excluding streets and alleys). A request that the annexing municipality approve the annexation. Annexation Technical Criteria Form 08/09 Page 1 of 11 nit:blank 6/29/2( X X x X X X X X X Page 2 of If not already included, consent to the inclusion of the property into the applicable special districts as appropriate. A waiver of any right to election pursuant to Section 28 of Article X of the Colorado Constitution before a district can impose property tax levies and special assessments. The dated signatures of petitioning landowners. Petition signatures must be signed within one hundred eighty (180) days of the date the petition is first submitted to the Town Clerk. The mailing address of each signer of the petition. The full legal description of land owned by each signer of the petition (if platted, by lot and block; if un-platted, by metes and bounds). The affidavit of each petition circulator that each petitioner's signature is valid. 8. Annexation Map. The annexation map shall be signed and sealed by the registered land surveyor or engineer preparing the map, or under whose supervision the annexation map was prepared. Provide one (1) "Annexation Map Land Surveying Standards Checklist" completed by the Surveyor (attach to the "original" application packet). The annexation map shall be an original drawing on 24" x 36" flat, spliceless, tapeless and creaseless sheet(s) of double matte mylar film with a uniform thickness of not less than .003 of an inch, using only permanent black ink that will adhere to drafting films, or an acceptable "fix -line" photographic reproduction (emulsion down), or a computer generated reproduction of the original drawing. A margin line shall be drawn completely around each sheet leaving a margin at least one-half ('/2) inch on three sides and a margin at least two (2) inches on the left (short) side, entirely blank. Unless otherwise specified, text and numbers are to be large enough to be clearly legible at the scale drawn. Paper copies of the annexation map(s) shall be blue line or black line copies of the original, folded to 12" x 9" size. The applicant shall also provide paper 11" x 17" and 8'/2 "x 1 I" reductions of the annexation map(s). The annexation map shall be drafted at a scale that best conveys the detailed survey, and confines the drafting error to less than one (1) percent. Acceptable scales are 1 "=50' or 1"=100' and for annexations exceeding one hundred (100) acres, 1 "=200'. In special instances another scale may be approved by the Town. When an annexation requires multiple sheets, an index (composite map with match lines) shall be provided that delineates the boundaries and identify each sheet number. The scale of a composite map may be different from the individual sheets, as approved by the Town. A `title sheet" containing the certifications and signature blocks shall be provided in the event that the annexation map sheet is too crowded. Annexation Technical Criteria Form 08/09 Page 2 of 11 )ut:blank 6/29/2( X X X X X Page 3 of The title shall be centered at the top of the sheet along the long dimension of each sheet shall include the name of the proposed annexation. A general legal description stating the section, township, range, 6th P.M., Town of Mead, Weld County, Colorado, shall be included under the name. On the title sheet (Sheet #1), under the general legal description, include the total acreage. Annexation names may not duplicate existing annexation names. Example: PINE VIEW ANNEXATION TO THE TOWN OF MEAD, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO A Part of the E12 of Section 23, Township _ North, Range _West, _th P.M., Mead, Colorado 78.05 Acres There shall be a title block in the lower right-hand corner, or along the right-hand margin that contains the name, address and telephone number of the land owner, the developer, and the engineer or surveyor preparing the drawing, an appropriate title for the drawing, the preparation date, sheet number, the preparer's project identification numbers, revision dates, draftsman's initials, and the electronic drawing file name (matching the AutoCADTM drawing file provided to the Town). Adjacent to the title block, in the lower right-hand corner, there shall be a legend block which shall include a description of lines, points and symbols, a double - headed north arrow designated as true north and a written and graphic scale. Adjacent to the right margin, or in a column to the right of the center of the title page if the page is crowded, there shall be the Town's standard statement of ownership containing a written metes and bounds legal description of the land to be annexed (including the full width of abutting roadways not already within the Town) followed by the owner's signature block(s) and notary block(s), one for each owner or mortgagee. Immediately following the ownership certificate, there shall be the Town's standard Surveyor's certificate, signed, dated and sealed by a licensed surveyor or engineer. Immediately following the Surveyor's certificate, there shall be the Town's standard certificate blocks for the Planning Commission and Board of Trustees. Immediately following the Board of Trustees approval certificate, there shall be the Town's standard recording certificate block for the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. The Annexation Map shall contain on its face the following certificates. Text is to be 10 pt. (0.13888") AutoCADT^'' Roman Simplex, Helvetica, Arial or similar "san serf' type. Add signature lines to the Certificate of Ownership and spaces in the Notary Certificate as necessary for multiple owners. Add additional Notary Certificates as necessary for out-of-town signatories. Remove "extra" titles and signature lines in the Certificate of Ownership and spaces in the Notary Certificate as appropriate. The certificates are to be placed in columns not more than 6 '%r" in width. If multiple columns are required, separate the columns by 1". Legal descriptions are to contain a blank line separating each clause in the description. Annexation Technical Criteria Form 08/09 Page 3 of 11 )ut:blank 6/29/2( X x Page 4 of A vicinity map that depicts the area to be annexed and the area which surrounds the proposed annexation within a two -(2) mile radius superimposed on a current USGS Topographical Map, maintaining the same scale shall be placed on the left side of annexation map, outside the boundary of the area being annexed, or on the left side of the title sheet. The annexation map drawing shall contain the following: • Show the outline of area to be annexed with boldest line. • For all references, show book, page, map number, etc., and place where publicly recorded. • Show all recorded and apparent rights -of -way lines of roads both within and without the periphery of land to be annexed; these roads are those which are adjacent, adjoining, contiguous, and/or coincident with boundary. Provide all road names, right-of-way widths at each leg of an intersection, at the point of curve and point of tangent, at dead ends and at angle points; and right-of-way lines with accurate bearings and dimensions including chord lengths and bearings, central angles and radii of all curves. Whenever the centerline of a road has been established or recorded, the date and recording information shall be shown on the Annexation Map. • Show on the annexation map, next to the boundary of the area proposed to be annexed, a drawing of the contiguous boundary of the Town and the contiguous boundary of any other municipality abutting the area proposed to be annexed. A hatched boundary line shall be used to depict the boundary contiguous to the Town (example: ///////////). • Show section, quarter section, and other monument corners. Display ties to section corners and to the State grid, if available, which show dimensions of all primary boundary survey control points with complete monument and location descriptions, all parcel lines showing dimensions with lengths, bearings, and curve data, including chord lengths and bearings, basis of bearings and relation to true meridian and similar data. Only circular curves shall be used. No spirals, parabolas, etc. shall be used. All dimensions are to be shown to the nearest 0.01' or in the case of degrees, to the nearest second. An accuracy of 1:50,000 (second order) minimum for linear and angular (bearing) closure shall be required for the boundary. All internal lots, tracts, or parcels shall have a closure accuracy of 0.01'. • Provided a description of all monuments, both found and set, which mark the boundaries of the property and of all control monuments used in conducting the survey. • Show the location of each ownership tract in un-platted land, and if part or all of the area is platted, the boundaries and plat numbers of plots or of lots and blocks. • Show the names and locations of all abutting subdivisions. The locations of all abutting un-platted parcels and public lands shall be depicted and designated as such. • The ownership identity of all mineral rights shall be designated on the map. Annexation Technical Criteria Form 08/09 Page 4 of 11 >ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 5 of • Show the purpose, widths, location (with fine dashed lines) and ownership of all easements and all abutting easements, including but not limited to utility, oil and gas gathering and transmission lines and irrigation ditches (fee or prescriptive). If any easement already of record cannot be definitely located, a statement of its existence, the nature thereof and its recorded reference must appear on the title sheet. The widths of all easements and sufficient data to definitively locate the same with respect to the parcel to be annexed must be shown. All easements must be clearly labeled and identified. If an easement shown on the annexation map is of record, its recorded reference must be given. • All lines, names and descriptions on the annexation map which do not constitute a part of the annexation shall be depicted in dashed or screened lines. Any area enclosed by the annexation, but not a part thereof, shall be labeled "Not a Part of This Annexation." • Accurately locate 100 -year floodplains, all existing and proposed watercourses, retention and detention areas, wetlands, aquifer recharge areas, streams, lakes, or inlets on the affected property. • Show clearly the length and bearing of all lines described in the written description. • Show section numbers, quarter section quadrants, township and range lines, and label each. • Show all lines, calls, arcs, etc., described in written description. • Circle or place an ellipse around each location where a detail drawing will be provided, and provide designation for each detail such as "See Detail A." • Show "Point of Beginning" in bold letters with an arrow. • Show "True Point of Beginning" with bold letters and arrow, when appropriate. • A map note shall indicate the total perimeter of the annexation boundary, the contiguous length to the existing Town boundary and the length representing one -sixth (1/6) of the total annexation boundary perimeter. • Lot and block numbers if the area is already platted. • Existing easements. X X X Ownership of each adjacent parcel to the annexation. An AutoCADTM drawing file as required by the Town Engineer of the annexation map(s) and title sheets and all fonts used, shall be provided on compact disks, or by other acceptable electronic transfer. Large drawing files are to be compressed. If multiple maps are used, one drawing file must combine all the parts into one map showing the entire annexation. AutoCADTM drawing files of each revision to the annexation map shall be provided at the time the revision is submitted to the Town. 9_ Concept Plan Map. Paper copies of the concept plan map(s) shall be blue line or black line copies of the original, folded to 12" x 9" size and shall contain the following: Show the boundary of the area to be developed; Annexation Technical Criteria Form 08/09 Page 5 of 11 )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 6 of X Provide a written legal description of the area to be developed; X X X X X X x X X Show the general location of each proposed land use on the property and the percentage of the whole for each use. General location of land uses may be shown as irregular graphic shapes depicting the approximate size and relationship to adjacent land uses. A table shall be used to list densities and land use by type, including the area of each, the density of residential development and the maximum and minimum lot sizes, and the maximum square footage of commercial and industrial buildings and the maximum and minimum lot sizes; Show existing and proposed arterial and collector streets and their relationship to the principal land uses on the site; Show existing and proposed major utility lines or facilities and their relationship to the principal land uses on the site; Show contour lines at ten (10) foot intervals, except when there are significant geographical features on the land and a different interval is determined to be more appropriate; and Show significant natural or manmade features on the site and contiguous to the property, including but not limited to, bluffs, tree galleries, lakes and ponds, irrigation ditches, watercourses and wetlands. An AutoCADTM drawing file and any other electronic submittal, as may be required by the Town, of the concept plan map(s) and title sheets and all fonts used, shall be provided on Town approved electronic transfer formats. Large drawing files are to be compressed. If multiple maps are used, one drawing file must combine all the parts into one map showing the entire annexation. AutoCADTM drawing files and any other electronic submittal, as may be required by the Town, of each revision to the concept plan map shall be provided at the time the revision is submitted to the Town. 10. Title Commitment. The applicant shall submit proof of ownership in the form of a current title commitment, issued by a title insurance company licensed by the State of Colorado, whose effective date shall be less than (30) thirty days prior to the date of submittal of the annexation petition. 11. Property Tax Statement. A copy of the prior year's property tax statement for all property to be annexed. 12. Annexation Impact Report. A draft annexation impact report conforming to C.R.S. § 31-12-108.5 is required for areas of ten (10) or more acres. Any deviation from the Town's standard form will require review and approval by the Town Attorney before the annexation impact report is accepted for processing by the Town. The impact report shall contain the following information: Annexation Technical Criteria Form 08/09 Page 6 of 11 mut:blank 6/29/2( X X X X X X X x X Page 7 of A map or maps of the municipality and adjacent territory showing the present and proposed boundaries of the municipality in the vicinity of the proposed annexation; the present streets, major trunk water mains, sewer interceptors and outfalls, other utility lines and irrigation and drainage ditches, and the proposed extension of such streets and utility lines in the vicinity of the proposed annexation; and the existing and proposed land use pattern in the areas to be annexed; A copy of any draft or final pre -annexation agreement, if available; A statement setting forth the plans of the municipality for extending to or otherwise providing for, within the area to be annexed, municipal services performed by or for the municipality at the time of annexation; A statement setting forth the method under which the municipality plans to finance the extension of the municipal services into the area to be annexed (those municipal services supplied by the Town; A statement identifying existing special districts within the area to be annexed; and A statement on the effect of annexation upon local public school district systems including the estimated number of students generated and the capital construction required to educate such students. 13. Consistency with the Town Comprehensive Plan. The applicant is required to provide a narrative response related to the conformance of the project to the goals identified in the Comprehensive Plan. 14. Water Rights. The applicant shall provide a "Water Rights Report" for the property prepared by a qualified water engineer or water attorney detailing the water rights appurtenant to and severed from the property to be annexed and their historical use. The report must include both surface (tributary) and subsurface (non -tributary and not non - tributary groundwater). In addition the applicant shall provide a signed standard form warranty deed for the transfer of all subsurface (non -tributary) water rights to the Town. 15. Zoning of Property to Be Annexed. If zoning is requested simultaneously with annexation, the petitioner must submit a completed Zoning Application form, provide a Zoning Map for the property, a zoning amendment map amending the official zoning map and pay the application and recording fees_ If zoning is not requested simultaneously with annexation, the property is required by statute to be brought under the Town's Zoning Code and Zoning Map within ninety (90) days of the completion of the annexation process. 16. Annexation Assessment Report. The application is to be accompanied by a narrative report assessing the effect of the proposed annexation upon the community and existing services and facilities. It shall detail the need for any expansion of those services and facilities to accommodate the development proposed for the property being annexed. The narratives shall he one or more paragraphs in length, and adequate to fully explain the Annexation Technical Criteria Form 08/09 Page 7 of 11 rut:blank 6/29/2( Page 8 of needs, concepts and proposed solutions for each of the following: X X X X X X X X X X An assessment of the community needs for the proposed annexation and land use; The economic impact to the municipality of the proposed annexation. This is to include an analysis of short-term and long-term municipal revenues to be generated by the development, short-term and long-term municipal expenses likely to be incurred as a result of the annexation and development, and proposals to mitigate any negative impacts; The school impact including an estimated of the number of students to be generated by development of the property, capital construction required to educate the students, and proposals to mitigate any negative school impacts; The impact on the existing transportation system and proposals to mitigate any negative transportation impacts upon the community (arterial and collector street improvements, intersection improvements, intersection signalization, alternative modes of transportation, etc.) The impact of the proposed development on the existing storm drainage system and proposals to mitigate any negative drainage impacts upon the community (historic rainfall drainage patterns, detention and retention areas, storm sewer requirements, discharged irrigation ditches, floodways and floodplains, etc.). The impact of the proposed development on the Town's Law Enforcement Agency or Police Department and proposals to mitigate any impact upon the existing police services (special security needs, additional officers required, additional equipment requirements, etc.); The impact of the proposed development on the appropriate Fire Protection District and proposals to mitigate any impact upon the existing fire protection services (special fire hazards, fire prevention, fire detection, emergency access, additional equipment requirements, additional manpower requirements, additional fire stations, etc.); The impact of the proposed development on the Town's park facilities and recreation programs and proposals to mitigate any impact upon the existing facilities and programs (additional facilities, additional recreation programs, additional personnel required, etc.); The impact of the proposed development on the environment of the Town and proposals to mitigate any negative impact (identify environmentally sensitive areas, endangered species, significant habitats, etc.); The short-term and long-term economic development potential for the property (numbers of jobs to be created, sales and use tax generation, property tax generation, utility revenue generation, incentives to be offered, etc.); Annexation Technical Criteria Form 08/09 Page 8 of 11 )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 9 of X X X X TBD The compatibility of the proposed development with the street master plan as depicted in the Town Comprehensive Plan and proposals for mitigating any negative impact; The compatibility of the proposed development with the Town Comprehensive Plan and any plan amendments that may be necessary for the proposed development; The compatibility of the proposed development with the Town Land Use Code and any deviations in setbacks, space requirements, and permitted uses that may be required for the proposed development; and A review of existing and adjacent land uses, areas of compatibility or conflict, and possible mitigation measures that may be required for the proposed development. Letters of Support. The application is to be accompanied by letters of support indicating a commitment to serve from each special district servicing the area to be annexed. A water supply study must be prepared by a Colorado registered professional engineer or other water supply expert. The report must comply with the requirements of C.R.S. 29-20-301 through 306. 17. A draft Annexation Agreement. Applicant Certification Sign in blue ink. Attach additional pages with certification language and signatures if more than two applicants. I (We) certify this application aall submittals hereto are complete and accurate. Applica Date Applicant(s) Date Annexation Technical Criteria Form 08/09 Page 9 of 11 nut:blank 6/29/2( Page 10 of Staff l use Only Upon acceptance of this application by the Town as a complete application, a copy of this form, with anticipated hearing dates, shall be provided to the applicant by the Town. Anticipated hearing dates may not be actual hearing dates depending upon referral comments received by the Town. Application Accepted Date Fees Accepted Date Amount By Application Determined Complete Date By Annexation Referral to Board of Trustees Board of Trustees Findings of Substantial Compliance Date Planning Commission Public Hearing Date Board of Trustees Public Hearing Date By 1. Applicant submits forty-four (44) copies, of which nineteen (19) should be individually bound in D -ring binders, of the application to the Town Clerk. In addition to any hard copies required, all maps, legal descriptions and property ownership reports will be provided on three (3) CDs. The original application and all documents requiring a signature shall be signed in blue ink. 2. Town Clerk to provide Notice of Public Hearing for Annexation published four successive weeks. 3. Town Clerk sends a copy of the published notice, together with a copy of the adopted Resolution and the petition as filed, shall be sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the Weld County Board of County Commissioners and the Weld County Attorney and any special district or school district having territory within the area to be annexed, at least (25) twenty-five days prior to the date fixed for the public hearing. 4. Town Clerk sends referrals and surrounding property owners' notifications sent no later than thirty (30) days prior to the Planning Commission Public Hearing. 5. Town Clerk sends notifications regarding "flagpole" annexations, if applicable. 6. The petitioner shall be responsible for posting the property. The petitioner shall submit a signed, notarized affidavit certifying that the property was posted on the required date and in the locations as approved by the Town. Annexation Technical Criteria Form 08/09 Page 10 of 11 nut:blank 6/29/2( Page 11 of 7. After final passage of the annexation ordinance, the applicant shall submit four (4) mylars and one (1) paper copies of the final annexation map within thirty (30) days of the effective date of the ordinance. The Town will file one (1) mylar and one (1) paper copy of the annexation map with the original of the annexation ordinance in the office of the Town Clerk. The Town will file for recording three (3) certified copies of the annexation ordinance and annexation map with the County Clerk and Recorder. The Town shall request the Weld County Clerk to forward one (1) copy of the annexation map and ordinance to the Division of Local Government in the Colorado Department of Local Affairs and one (1) copy of the annexation map and ordinance to the Department of Revenue of the State of Colorado. Annexation Technical Criteria Form 08/09 Page 11 of 11 )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 1 e Town of Mead 970-535-4477 www.townofmead.org LUA # AN. 441 Third Street P.O. Box 626 Mead, CO 80542 ANNEXATION TECllNIC AL CRITERIA FORM Project Name The Highlands Project Location Generally south of and adjacent to CR 36 approx. midway between I-25 and CR 7 Date Submitted Fees Submitted Please provide the following with this checklist. For additional information, refer to Chapter 16, Article VIII of the Mead Town Code. X X X 1. Six (6) paper copies of the complete annexation application package. 2. All maps, legal descriptions and surrounding property owner information on 3 USB Drives (or CD-ROM). 3. Land Use Application Form, including certification of ownership or statement of authority. Staff will provide form to applicant. 4_ Fee Agreement and Deposit. Staff will provide boilerplate agreement to applicant. 5. Surrounding and Interested Property Ownership Report. County Assessor tool shall be used to generate this report. 6. Title Commitment (dated within 30 days of application). 7. An affidavit certifying the names and addresses of all mineral and subsurface right owners. 8. Letter of Intent to Annex. 9. Annexation Petition. The applicant shall submit a petition for annexation complying with the requirements ofC.R_S. § 31-12-107. The Town's standard form petition shall be utilized. The petition shall contain the statements outlined in Section 16-8-60 of the Mead Municipal Code, 10. Annexation Map. The annexation map shall he signed and sealed by the registered land surveyor or engineer preparing the map, or under whose supervision the annexation map was prepared. Provide one ( I ) "Annexation Map Land Surveying Standards Checklist'. completed by the Surveyor (attach to the "oriulnal" application packet). The mut:blank 6/29/2( Page 2 c Annexation Map shall conform to the standards outlined in Section 16-8-80 of the Mead Municipal Code. X X X X X X 11. Concept Plan Map. Paper copies of the concept plan map(s) shall be blue line or black line copies of the original, folded to 12" x 9" size and shall contain meet the technical standards outlined in Section 16-8-90 of the Mead Municipal Code. 12. Property Tax Statement. A copy of the prior year's property tax statement for all property to be annexed. 13. Annexation Impact Report. A draft annexation impact report conforming to C.R.S. § 31-12-108.5 is required for areas of ten (10) or more acres. Any deviation from the Town's standard form will require review and approval by the Town Attorney before the annexation impact report is accepted for processing by the Town. The impact report shall contain the information outlined in Section 16-8-60(b)(8) of the Mead Municipal Code. 14. Consistency with the Town Comprehensive Plan. The applicant is required to provide a narrative response related to the conformance of the project to the goals identified in the Comprehensive Plan. 15. Water Rights. The applicant shall provide a "Water Rights Report" for the property prepared by a qualified water engineer or water attorney detailing the water rights appurtenant to and severed from the property to be annexed and their historical use. The report must include both surface (tributary) and subsurface (non -tributary and not non - tributary groundwater). In addition, the applicant shall provide a signed standard form warranty deed for the transfer of all subsurface (non -tributary) water rights to the Town. 16. Zoning of Property to Be Annexed. If zoning is requested simultaneously with annexation, the petitioner must submit a completed Zoning Application form, provide a Zoning Map for the property, a zoning amendment map amending the official zoning map and pay the application and recording fees. If zoning is not requested simultaneously with annexation, the property is required by statute to be brought under the Town's Zoning Code and Zoning Map within ninety (90) days of the completion of the annexation process. 17. Annexation Assessment Report. The application is to be accompanied by a narrative report assessing the effect of the proposed annexation upon the community and existing services and facilities. It shall detail the need for any expansion of those services and facilities to accommodate the development proposed for the property being annexed. The narratives shall be one or more paragraphs in length, and adequate to fully explain the needs, concepts and proposed solutions for each of the issues outlined in Section 16-8- 60(b)(12) of the Mead Municipal Code. 18. A draft Annexation Agreement. Staff will provide the boilerplate agreement to applicant. Annexation Technical Criteria Form 1-30-2018 Page 2 of 3 )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 3 C Applicant Certification Sign in blue ink. Attach additional pages with certification language and signatures if more than two applicants. I (We) certify this application and all submittals hereto are complete and accurate. Applicant(s) Date Applicant(s) Date Annexation Technical Criteria Form 1-30-2018 Page 3 of 3 )ut:blank 6/29/2( LUINI, LP 1 PLAN Page 1 a • 1 I 1 • I I • I I I ( 1 1 I I bah IMO 00 • I I • 1 I ( 1 I I I I I I • • ( I I • I I I I ag ' f I +a!Irs ZT 1 I I • I ; ;I!: : f • I i 1 I I $ 1 I I a, t 1 I I 4 1 IRAs. CONst C' tuft THE HIGHLANDS PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10 TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH. RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH P M TOWN OF MEAD. COUNTY OF WELD STATE OF COLORADO 64 866 ACRES TOTAir 220 SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING UNITS Ala a Iwr.a. IRIS I/ • einatani. 40. 1 1 I 1 1 I Iw_ ww 5. • • • I 1 1 • • • ( • 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 1 4 1 G � 4 PARK A ca arc Ma swats ISSW. —ea • 1 OPEN SPACE & LANDSCAPE MUffER I 1 I I I LEGEND 4I I VEHICULAR ACCESS POINT — MIN elf � TRAIL CONNECTION ■ I • - D 'WM n♦ FEL WI m11G7 (.O14SE Crla. ,p, ui/ ►II ;I Cre I- • seal • I I I 1 • (• 1 I II 1 11 II • • I I I I 1 I II II • ti!tut .fl °GALE, w . Alp/ Abe PR<ISPE.R I_ %D& f]HI ELOP*WI. I.LC C$ Ism••► W.= Lassa 1. a *Si strict wt. swoon Lakin as .s INCastii# ICIER UA CUNS0L I If% (sRUCP. LLl' 4 wn11 s11. kii Sw Jana it :Sri.; H 1- GS SNOW nee SINK Now 410.#0.401 SS +.a..., a. :se asst a.�aar .•I.LASS' b CONCEPT PLAN rut:blank 6129/2( Page 1 of Certificate Of Taxes Due Account Number W8940395 Parcel 120710000055 Assessed To GALLEGOS STELLA S FAMILY TRUST C/O GBT TRUST DEPT PO BOX 1159 LONGMONT, CO 80502-1159 Ceniticate Number 160115 Order Number 25154714 Vendor ID 14 LAND TITLE GUARANTEE OF FT COLLINS 772 WHALERS WAY STE 100 FT COLLINS , CO 80525 Legal Desaiption 30AF LOT B OF REC EXEMPT 41_207-I0-2-RE2579 AS REC IN 2807299; EXC ALL EXIST RN/ & EASE Sims Address Year Tax Interest Fees Payments Balance Gland Total Due as of 01/12/2018 $0.00 WARNING - THIS TAX CERTIFICATE DOES NOT WARRANT ANY TAXES OWED ON UNDERLYING ACCOUNTS, INCLUDING PARENT OR SIBLING ACCOUNTS. ALL TAX LIEN SALE AMOUNTS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE DUE TO ENDORSEMENT OF CURRENT TAXES BY THE LIENHOLDER OR TO ADVERTISING AND DISTRAINT WARRANT FEES. CHANGES MAY OCCUR AND THE TREASURER'S OFFICE WILL NEED TO BE CONTACTED PRIOR TO REMITTANCE. TAX LIEN SALE REDEMPTION AMOUNTS MUST BE PAID BY CASH OR CASHIER'S CHECK. POSTMARKS ARE NOT ACCEPTED ON TAX LIEN SALE REDEMPTION PAYMENTS. PAYMENTS MUST BE IN OUR OFFICE AND PROCESSED BY THE LAST BUSINESS DAY OF THE MONTH. SPECIAL TAXING DISTRICTS AND THE BOUNDARIES OF SUCH DISTRICTS MAY BE ON FILE WITH THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISIONERS, THE COUNTY CLERK, OR THE COUNTY ASSESSOR. This certificate does not include land or improvements assessed under a separate account number, personal property taxes, transfer tax or misc. tax collected on behalf of other entities, special or local improvement district assessments or mobile homes, unless specifically mentioned. I, the undersigned do hereby certify that the entire amount of taxes due upon the above described parcel of real property and all outstanding sales for unpaid taxes as shown by the records in my office from which the same may still be redeemed with the amount required for redemption are as noted herein. In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal. TREASURER, WELD COUNTY, John R. Lefebvre, Jr. 1400 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 (970) 353-3845 Ext. 3290 Jan 12 2018 2:29:34 PM Paae 1 of 1 )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 2 of Certificate Of Taxes Due Account Number R0528501 Parcel 120710000055 Assessed To GALLEGOS STELLA S FAMILY TRUST C/O GBT TRUST DEPT PO BOX 1159 LONGMONT, CO 80502-I 159 Certificate Number 160114 Order Number 25154714 Vendor ID 14 LAND TITLE GUARANTEE OF FT COLLINS 772 WHALERS WAY STE 100 FT COLLINS , CO 80525 Legal Description PT NW4 10-3-68 LOT H REC EXEMPT RE -2579 (.21R) Situs Address Year Tax Tax Charge Interest Fees Payments Balance 2017 $1,005.46 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,005.46 Total Tax Charge $1,005.46 Grand Total Due as of 01/12/2018 $1,005.46 Tax Billed at 2017 Rates for Tax Area 2309 - 2309 Authority WELD COUNTY SCHOOL DIST REIJ NORTHERN COLORADO WATER (NC ST VRAIN LEFT HAND WATER (S MOUNTAIN VIEW FIRE HIGH PLAINS LIBRARY Taxes Billed 2017 * Credit Levy Kill Levy 15.8000000* 56 3940000 1.0000000 0.1560000 11.7470000 3.2560000 Amount $179.81 $641.76 $11.38 SI.78 $133.68 $37 05 88.3530000 $1.005 46 Values AG -FLOOD IRRRIGA TED LAND AG -MEADOW HAY LAND Total Actual Assessed $37,274 $10,810 $I,952 $570 $39,226 $11,380 WARNING - THIS TAX CERTIFICATE DOES NOT WARRANT ANY TAXES OWED ON UNDERLYING ACCOUNTS, INCLUDING PARENT OR SIBLING ACCOUNTS. ALL TAX LIEN SALE AMOUNTS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE DUE TO ENDORSEMENT OF CURRENT TAXES BY THE LIENHOLDER OR TO ADVERTISING AND DISTRAINT WARRANT FEES. CHANGES MAY OCCUR AND THE TREASURER'S OFFICE WILL NEED TO BE CONTACTED PRIOR TO REMITTANCE, TAX LIEN SALE REDEMPTION AMOUNTS MUST BE PAID BY CASH OR CASHIER'S CHECK. POSTMARKS ARE NOT ACCEPTED ON TAX LIEN SALE REDEMPTION PAYMENTS. PAYMENTS MUST BE IN OUR OFFICE AND PROCESSED BY THE LAST BUSINESS DAY OF THE MONTH. SPECIAL TAXING DISTRICTS AND THE BOUNDARIES OF SUCH DISTRICTS MAY BE ON FILE WITH THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISIONERS, THE COUNTY CLERK, OR THE COUNTY ASSESSOR. This certificate does not include land or improvements assessed under a separate account number, personal property taxes, transfer tax or misc. tax collected on behalf of other entities, special or local improvement district assessments or mobile homes, unless specifically mentioned. I, the undersigned, do hereby certify that the entire amount of taxes due upon the above described parcel of real property and all outstanding sales for unpaid taxes as shown by the records in my office from which the same may still be redeemed with the amount required for redemption are as noted herein. In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal. TREASURER, WELD COUNTY, John R. Lefebvre, Jr. 1400 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 (970) 353-3845 Ext. 3290 Jan 12. 2018 2:29:34 PM Page 1 of 1 >ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 3 of Certificate Of Taxes Due Account Number R4736786 Parcel 120710000035 Assessed To GALLEGOS STELLA S FAMILY TRUST CIO VINCENT, ROMEO & RODRIGUEZ LLC 1070 W CENTURY DR STE 200 LOUISVILLE, CO 80027-1657 Certificate Number 160113 Order Number 25154714 Vendor ID 14 LAND TITLE GUARANTEE OF FT COLLINS 772 WHALERS WAY STE 100 FT COLLINS , CO 80525 Legal Desaiiption 25515D PT NW4 10 3 68 BEG N89DI3'E 1760' FROM NW COR N89D1YE 873.55' TO NE COR NW4 SOD4I'E 990' S89D13'W 885.36' N990' MIL. TO BEG (EXC .50A RD) Situs Address Year Tax Charge Tax Interest Fees Payments Balance 2017 $310.12 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $310.12 Total Tax Charge $310.12 Grand Total Due as of 01/12/2018 $310.12 Tax Billed at 2017 Rates for Tax Area 2309 2309 Autbmity WELD COUNTY SCHOOL DIST RE IJ NORTHERN COLORADO WATER (NC ST VRAIN LEFT HAND WATER (S MOUNTAIN VIEW FIRE HIGH PLAINS LIBRARY Taxes Billed 2017 *Credit Levy Mill Levy 15.8000000'r 56.3940000 1.0000000 0.1560000 11.7470000 3.2560000 Amount $55.47 $197 94 $3.51 $0.55 Total $41.23 $11.42 88.3530000 $310.12 Values AG -FLOOD IRRRIGATED LAND AG -GRAZING LAND Actual Amerced $12,019 $3,490 $74 $20 $12,093 $3,510 WARNING - THIS TAX CERTIFICATE DOES NOT WARRANT ANY TAXES OWED ON UNDERLYING ACCOUNTS, INCLUDING PARENT OR SIBLING ACCOUNTS. ALL TAX LIEN SALE AMOUNTS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE DUE TO ENDORSEMENT OF CURRENT TAXES BY THE LIENHOLDER OR TO ADVERTISING AND DISTRAINT WARRANT FEES. CHANGES MAY OCCUR AND THE TREASURER'S OFFICE WILL NEED TO BE CONTACTED PRIOR TO REMITTANCE. TAX LIEN SALE REDEMPTION AMOUNTS MUST BE PAID BY CASH OR CASHIER'S CHECK. POSTMARKS ARE NOT ACCEPTED ON TAX LIEN SALE REDEMPTION PAYMENTS. PAYMENTS MUST BE IN OUR OFFICE AND PROCESSED BY THE LAST BUSINESS DAY OF THE MONTH. SPECIAL TAXING DISTRICTS AND THE BOUNDARIES OF SUCH DISTRICTS MAY BE ON FILE WITH THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISIONERS, THE COUNTY CLERK, OR THE COUNTY ASSESSOR. This certificate does not include land or improvements assessed under a separate account number, personal property taxes, transfer tax or misc. tax collected on behalf of other entities, special or local improvement district assessments or mobile homes, unless specifically mentioned. I, the undersigned, do hereby certify that the entire amount of taxes due upon the above described parcel of real property and all outstanding sales for unpaid taxes as shown by the records in my office from which the same may still be redeemed with the amount required for redemption are as noted herein. In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal. TREASURER, WELD COUNTY, John R. Lefebvre, Jr. 1400 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 (970) 353-3845 Ext. 3290 Jan 12. 2018 2:29:33 PM Page 1 of 1 nit:blank 6/29/2( Page 4 of Land Title Guarantee Company Customer Distribution Land Title c.++anew%Ttr r(MPM,V Siur ryh, PREVENT FRAUD - Please remember to call a member of our closing team when initiating a wire transfer or providing wiring instructions. Order Number: ABZ25154714-4 Property Address: 000000, Mead, CO 80542 Date: 05/08/2018 PLEASE CONTACT YOUR CLOSER OR CLOSER'S ASSISTANT FOR WIRE TRANSFER INSTRUCTIONS For Closing Assistance Shelly Zissimos 916 S MAIN ST #301 LONGMONT, CO 80501 (303) 488-5457 (Work) (303) 393-3860 (Work Fax) szissimosaltgc.com Contact License: 00551038 Company License: CO44565 For Title Assistance Kim Zimmerman 5975 GREENWOOD PLAZA BLVD GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO 80111 (720) 406-2083 (Work) kzimmermanOltgc.com Buyer/Borrower PROSPER LAND AND DEVELOPMENT LLC Attention: SERGE GOLDBERG AND WILL EDGINGTON 428 KIMBARK STREET LONGMONT, CO 80501 Serge@liverichfield.com Will@liverichfield.com joe@prosperlanddev.com Delivered via: Electronic Mail Seller/Owner STELLA S GALLEGOS FAMILY TRUST romeo@elderlawcoiorado.com Delivered via: Electronic Mail Agent for Seller DYER REALTY INC Attention: MARVIN DYER 520 MAIN ST #A LONGMONT, CO 80501 (303) 772-3200 (Work) (303) 651-1320 (Work Fax) dyerrealty80501@gmail.com Delivered via: Electronic Mail Attorney for Buyer PACKARD AND DIERKING LLC Attention: REBECCA HALL WATERSTREET 2595 CANYON BLVD #200 BOULDER, CO 80302 (303) 447-0450 (Work) (303) 447-0451 (Work Fax) becky@packarddierking.com Delivered via: Electronic Mail Attorney for Buyer PACKARD DIERKING Attention: CARRIE RAPP-URBAN carrie@packarddierking.com Delivered via: Electronic Mail Attorney for Seller FLANDERS ELSBERG HERBER & DUNN LLC Attention: SCOTT DUNN 401 MAIN ST #1 LONGMONT. CO 80501 (303) 776-5380 (Work) (303) 776-8102 (Work Fax) sdunn@flanderslaw.com Delivered via: Electronic Mail mut:blank 6/29/2( Page 5 of Land Title Guarantee Company Estimate of Title Fees Land litle Gs.'.\.R\!,Tr.r ``r'f,�tAVM. r —Stoke ry,.^— Order Number: ABZ25154714-4 Property Address: 000000, Mead, CO 80542 Parties: PROSPER LAND AND DEVELOPMENT, LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY Date: 05/08/2018 THE STELLA S. GALLEGOS FAMILY TRUST AND PETE GALLEGOS SUBJECT TO ADMINISTRATION IN THE ESTATE OF PETE GALLEGOS DECEASED, UNDER THE COLORADO PROBATE CODE Visit Land Title's Website at www.ltgc.com for directions to any of our offices. "ALTA" Owner's Policy 06-17-06 Builder/Developer Rate Deletion of Standard Exception(s) Endorsement Patent -06 #10 Tax Certificate (will be ordered prior to closing) $1,058.00 $100.00 $100.00 $52.00 Total $1,310.00 If Land Title Guarantee Company will be closing this transaction, the fees listed above will be collected at closing. Thank you for your order! Chain of Title Documents: Weld county recorded 02/10/1970 under reception no. 1542463 Weld county recorded 01/09/1957 at book 1467 page 385 Weld county recorded 09/29/2003 under reception no. 3111000 Weld county recorded 09/29/2003 under reception no. 3110999 )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 6 of ALTA COMMITMENT Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule A Order Number:ABZ251547144 Property Address: 000000, Mead, CO 80542 1. Effective Date: 05/02/2018 at 5:00 P.M. 2. Policy to be issued and Proposed Insured: "ALTA" Owner's Policy 06-17-06 Builder/Developer Rate Proposed Insured: PROSPER LAND AND DEVELOPMENT, LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY $850,000.00 3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment and covered herein is: A Fee Simple 4. Title to the estate or interest covered herein is at the effective date hereof vested in: THE STELLA S. GALLEGOS FAMILY TRUST AND PETE GALLEGOS SUBJECT TO ADMINISTRATION IN THE ESTATE OF PETE GALLEGOS DECEASED, UNDER THE COLORADO PROBATE CODE 5. The Land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: PARCEL I: THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 100 ACRES OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO EXCEPTING THOSE PARCELS CONVEYED BY DEEDS RECORDED SEPTEMBER 15. 2005 AT RECEPTION NO. 3323096 AND JULY 5, 2017 AT RECEPTION NO. 4315144 NOW KNOWN AS: LOT B, RECORDED EXEMPTION NO. 1207 -10 -2 -RE -2579, RECORDED NOVEMBER 16, 2000 AT RECEPTION NO. 2807299, LOCATED IN THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO. PARCEL II: ALL THAT PORTION OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 10. TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NW CORNER OF SAID NW 1!4 OF SECTION 10; THENCE N 89° 13' 00" EON AN ASSUMED BEARING, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NW 1/4, A DISTANCE OF 1760.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING N 89° 13' 00" E ALONG SAID NORTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 873.55 FEET TO THE NE CORNER OF SAID NW 14; THENCE S 00° 41' 00" E ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID NW 1'4, A DISTANCE OF 990 FEET: THENCE S 89° 13' 00" W, A DISTANCE OF 885.36 FEET TO A POINT SOUTH OF THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID POINT 1760 FEET EAST OF THE WEST LINE OF SAID NW 1 4: THENCE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 990 FEET. MORE OR LESS. TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 7 of ALTA COMMITMENT Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule A Order Number:ABZ25154714.4 Copyright 2006-2018 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION iiii: )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 8 of ALTA COMMITMENT Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule B, Part I (Requirements) Order Number: ABZ25154714-4 All of the following Requirements must be met: This proposed Insured must notify the Company in writing of the name of any party not referred to in this Commitment who will obtain an interest in the Land or who will make a loan on the Land. The Company may then make additional Requirements or Exceptions. Pay the agreed amount for the estate or interest to be insured. Pay the premiums, fees, and charges for the Policy to the Company. Documents satisfactory to the Company that convey the Title or create the Mortgage to be insured, or both, must be properly authorized, executed, delivered, and recorded in the Public Records. 1. A FULL COPY OF THE FULLY EXECUTED TRUST AGREEMENT AND ANY AND ALL AMENDMENTS THERETO FOR THE STELLA S GALLEGOS FIMILY TRUST MUST BE FURNISHED TO LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY, SAID AGREEMENT MUST DISCLOSE WHO MAY CONVEY, ACQUIRE, ENCUMBER, LEASE OR OTHERWISE DEAL WITH INTERESTS IN REAL PROPERTY FOR SAID ENTITY. NOTE: ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MAY BE NECESSARY UPON REVIEW OF THIS DOCUMENTATION. 2. WRITTEN CONFIRMATION THAT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY FOR THE STELLA S. GALLEGOS FAMILY TRUST RECORDED SEPTEMBER 15, 2005 AT RECEPTION NO. 3323095 IS CURRENT. NOTE: SAID INSTRUMENT DISCLOSES FIRST MAINSTREET BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS THE TRUSTEE, BY STEVEN E. MELVIN AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE INSTRUMENTS CONVEYING, ENCUMBERING OR OTHERWISE AFFECTING TITLE TO REAL PROPERTY ON BEHALF OF SAID ENTITY. IF THIS INFORMATION IS NOT ACCURATE, A CURRENT STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY MUST BE RECORDED. 3. A FULL COPY OF THE FULLY EXECUTED OPERATING AGREEMENT AND ANY AND ALL AMENDMENTS THERETO FOR PROSPER LAND AND DEVELOPMENT, LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY MUST BE FURNISHED TO LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY. SAID AGREEMENT MUST DISCLOSE WHO MAY CONVEY, ACQUIRE, ENCUMBER, LEASE OR OTHERWISE DEAL WITH INTERESTS IN REAL PROPERTY FOR SAID ENTITY. NOTE: ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MAY BE NECESSARY UPON REVIEW OF THIS DOCUMENTATION, 4. DULY EXECUTED AND ACKNOWLEDGED STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY SETTING FORTH THE NAME OF PROSPER LAND AND DEVELOPMENT, LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AS A LLC. THE STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY MUST STATE UNDER WHICH LAWS THE ENTITY WAS CREATED. THE MAILING ADDRESS OF THE ENTITY, AND THE NAME AND POSITION OF THE PERSON(S) AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE INSTRUMENTS CONVEYING. ENCUMBERING. OR OTHERWISE AFFECTING TITLE TO REAL PROPERTY ON BEHALF OF THE ENTITY AND OTHERWISE COMPLYING WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 38-30-172. CRS. NOTE: THE STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY MUST BE RECORDED WITH THE CLERK AND RECORDER. >ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 9 of ALTA COMMITMENT Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule B, Part I (Requirements) Order Number: ABZ25154714-4 All of the following Requirements must be met: 5. PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE'S DEED TO PROSPER LAND AND DEVELOPMENT, LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY IN THE ESTATE OF PETE GALLEGOS, DECEASED. LETTERS RECORDED JULY 5, 2017 AT RECEPTION NO. 4315143 6. WARRANTY DEED FROM THE STELLA S GALLEGOS FAMILY TRUST TO PROSPER LAND AND DEVELOPMENT, LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY CONVEYING SUBJECT PROPERTY. 7. (THIS ITEM WAS INTENTIONALLY DELETED) mut:blank 6/29/2( Page 10 of ALTA COMMITMENT Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule B, Part I (Requirements) Order Number: ABZ25154714-4 All of the following Requirements must be met: NOTE: ITEMS 1-3 OF THE STANDARD EXCEPTIONS WILL BE DELETED UPON RECEIPT OF A FINAL SIGNED/SEALED SURVEY. NOTE: UPON THE APPROVAL OF THE COMPANY AND THE RECEIPT OF A NOTARIZED FINAL LIEN AFFIDAVIT, ITEM NO. 4 OF THE STANDARD EXCEPTIONS ON THE LOAN POLICY WILL BE DELETED. UPON THE APPROVAL OF THE COMPANY AND THE RECEIPT OF A NOTARIZED FINAL LIEN AFFIDAVIT, ITEM NO.4 OF THE STANDARD EXCEPTIONS ON THE OWNER'S POLICY, WILL BE AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: ITEM NO.4 OF THE STANDARD EXCEPTIONS IS DELETED AS TO ANY LIENS OR FUTURE LIENS RESULTING FROM WORK OR MATERIAL FURNISHED AT THE SPECIFIC. DIRECT REQUEST. AND WITH THE ACTUAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE STELLA S. GALLEGOS FAMILY TRUST AND PETE GALLEGOS SUBJECT TO ADMINISTRATION IN THE ESTATE OF PETE GALLEGOS DECEASED. UNDER THE COLORADO PROBATE CODE. OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SHALL HAVE NO LIABILITY FOR ANY LIENS ARISING FROM WORK OR MATERIAL FURNISHED AT THE SPECIFIC. DIRECT REQUEST. AND WITH THE ACTUAL KNOWLEDGE OF PROSPER LAND AND DEVELOPMENT. LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY . NOTE: ITEM 5 OF THE STANDARD EXCEPTIONS WILL BE DELETED IF LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY CONDUCTS THE CLOSING OF THE CONTEMPLATED TRANSACTION(S) AND RECORDS THE DOCUMENTS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH. NOTE: UPON PROOF OF PAYMENT OF 2017 TAXES. ITEM 6 WILL BE AMENDED TO READ: TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS FOR THE YEAR 2018 AND SUBSEQUENT YEARS. A LIEN NOT YET DUE AND PAYABLE. >ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 11 of ALTA COMMITMENT Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule B, Part II (Exceptions) Order Number: A8Z25154714-4 This commitment does not republish any covenants, condition, restriction, or limitation contained in any document referred to in this commitment to the extent that the specific covenant, conditions, restriction, or limitation violates state or federal law based on race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, handicap, familial status, or national origin. 1. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records but that could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or that may be asserted by persons in possession of the Land. 2. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records. 3. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public Records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the Public Records. 5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date of the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6. (a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. 7. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water. 8. RIGHT OF WAY FOR COUNTY ROADS 30 FEET ON EITHER SIDE OF SECTION AND TOWNSHIP LINES, AS ESTABLISHED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR WELD COUNTY, RECORDED OCTOBER 14, 1889 IN BOOK 86 AT PAGE 273. 9. (THIS ITEM WAS INTENTIONALLY DELETED) 10. RIGHT OF PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE THEREFROM SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PREMISES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED MAY 04, 1883. IN BOOK 34 AT PAGE N$. 11. OIL AND GAS LEASE RECORDED MARCH 16, 1981 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 1852283 AND ANY AND ALL ASSIGNMENTS THEREOF. OR INTEREST THEREIN. NOTE: EXTENSION OF THE ABOVE LEASE AS CLAIMED BY AFFIDAVIT OF PRODUCTION WAS RECORDED OCTOBER 24. 1984 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 1986118. )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 12 of ALTA COMMITMENT Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule B, Part ii (Exceptions) Order Number: ABZ25154714-4 NOTE: THE PRESENT OWNERSHIP OF THE LEASEHOLD CREATED BY SAID LEASE AND OTHER MATTERS AFFECTING THE INTEREST OF THE LESSEE ARE NOT SHOWN HEREIN. 12. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF GRANT OF EASEMENT RECORDED FEBRUARY 24, 2000 AT RECEPTION NO. 2751272. 13. EASEMENTS, CONDITIONS, COVENANTS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS AND NOTES ON THE PLAT OF EXEMPTION RECORDED NOVEMBER 06, 2000 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 2807299. 14. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF GRANT OF EASEMENT RECORDED FEBRUARY 05, 2001 AT RECEPTION NO. 2823541. 15. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF NOTICE OF COVENANT RECORDED JANUARY 12, 2015 AT RECEPTION NO. 4074654. 16. EXISTING LEASES OR TENANCIES NOT OF RECORD, IF ANY 17. UNDIVIDED 1/2 INTEREST IN AND TO ALL OIL, GAS AND OTHER MINERALS AS RESERVED IN DEED, RECORDED FEBRUARY 25, 1958, IN BOOK 1497 AT PAGE 356, AND ANY AND ALL ASSIGNMENTS THEREOF OR INTERESTS THEREIN. 18. OIL AND GAS LEASE RECORDED DECEMBER 28, 2017 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 4363827 AND ANY AND ALL ASSIGNMENTS THEREOF, OR INTEREST THEREIN. NOTE: THE PRESENT OWNERSHIP OF THE LEASEHOLD CREATED BY SAID LEASE AND OTHER MATTERS AFFECTING THE INTEREST OF THE LESSEE ARE NOT SHOWN HEREIN. 19. ANY FACTS, RIGHTS, INTERESTS OR CLAIMS WHICH MAY EXIST OR ARISE BY REASON OF THE FOLLOWING FACTS SHOWN ON ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY CERTIFIED JANUARY 30, 2018 PREPARED BY LANGE LAND SURVEYS, JOB #"ALTA" SAID DOCUMENT STORED AS OUR IMAGE 7276890 A. FENCES ARE NOT ENTIRELY COINCIDENT WITH BOUNDARY LINES AS SHOWN. B. IRRIGATION CANALS EXIST ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF PARCEL I. C. ANY RIGHTS OR INTERESTS OF THIRD PARTIES WHICH EXIST OR ARE CLAIMED TO EXIST IN AND OVER THAT PORTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY THAT LIES WITHIN DESIGNATED "WETLANDS" AREA. nut:blank 6/29/2( Page 13 of LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS Land Title MIA UMree mdw•Mr Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-11-122, notice is hereby given that: (A) The Subject real property may be located in a special taxing district. (B) A certificate of taxes due listing each taxing jurisdiction will be obtained from the county treasurer of the county in which the real property is located or that county treasurer's authorized agent unless the proposed insured provides written instructions to the contrary. (for an Owners Policy of Title Insurance pertaining to a sale of residential real property). (C) The information regarding special districts and the boundaries of such districts may be obtained from the Board of County Commissioners, the County Clerk and Recorder, or the County Assessor. Note: Effective September 1, 1997, CRS 30-10-406 requires that all documents received for recording or filing in the clerk and recorder's office shall contain a top margin of at least one inch and a left, right and bottom margin of at least one half of an inch. The clerk and recorder may refuse to record or file any document that does not conform, except that, the requirement for the top margin shall not apply to documents using forms on which space is provided for recording or filing information at the top margin of the document. Note: Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 8-1-2 requires that "Every title entity shall be responsible for all matters which appear of record prior to the time of recording whenever the title entity conducts the closing and is responsible for recording or filing of legal documents resulting from the transaction which was closed". Provided that Land Title Guarantee Company conducts the closing of the insured transaction and is responsible for recording the legal documents from the transaction, exception number 5 will not appear on the Owners Title Policy and the Lenders Policy when issued. Note: Affirmative mechanic's lien protection for the Owner may be available (typically by deletion of Exception no. 4 of Schedule 8, Section 2 of the Commitment from the Owner's Policy to be issued) upon compliance with the following conditions: (A) The land described in Schedule A of this commitment must be a single family residence which includes a condominium or townhouse unit. (B) No labor or materials have been furnished by mechanics or material -men for purposes of construction on the land described in Schedule A of this Commitment within the past 6 months. (C) The Company must receive an appropriate affidavit indemnifying the Company against un-filed mechanic's and material -men's liens. (D) The Company must receive payment of the appropriate premium. (E) If there has been construction, improvements or major repairs undertaken on the property to be purchased within six months prior to the Date of Commitment, the requirements to obtain coverage for unrecorded liens will include: disclosure of certain construction information; financial information as to the seller, the builder and or the contractor; payment of the'appropriate premium fully executed Indemnity Agreements satisfactory to the company, and, any additional requirements as may be necessary after an examination of the aforesaid information by the Company. No coverage will be given under any circumstances for labor or material for which the insured has contracted for or agreed to pay. )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 14 of Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-11-123, notice is hereby given: This notice applies to owner's policy commitments disclosing that a mineral estate has been severed from the surface estate, in Schedule B-2. (A) That there is recorded evidence that a mineral estate has been severed, leased, or otherwise conveyed from the surface estate and that there is substantial likelihood that a third party holds some or all interest in oil, gas, other minerals, or geothermal energy in the property; and (B) That such mineral estate may include the right to enter and use the property without the surface owner's permission. Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-1-128(6)(a), It is unlawful to knowingly provide false, incomplete, or misleading facts or information to an insurance company for the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the company. Penalties may include imprisonment, fines, denial of insurance, and civil damages. Any insurance company or agent of an insurance company who knowingly provides false, incomplete, or misleading facts or information to a policyholder or claimant for the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the policyholder or claimant with regard to a settlement or award payable from insurance proceeds shall be reported to the Colorado Division of Insurance within the Department of Regulatory Agencies. Note: Pursuant to Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 8-1-3, notice is hereby given of the availability of a closing protection letter for the lender, purchaser, lessee or seller in connection with this transaction. )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 15 of PP" JOINT NOTICE OF PRIVACY POLICY OF LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY, LandTtle. LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY OF SUMMIT COUNTY MA*MOM O0PAMNY —Si�cr ryb7� LAND TITLE INSURANCE CORPORATION AND OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY This Statement is provided to you as a customer of Land Title Guarantee Company and Meridian Land Title, LLC, as agents for Land Title Insurance Corporation and Old Republic National Title Insurance Company. We want you to know that we recognize and respect your privacy expectations and the requirements of federal and state privacy laws. Information security is one of our highest priorities. We recognize that maintaining your trust and confidence is the bedrock of our business. We maintain and regularly review internal and external safeguards against unauthorized access to non-public personal information ("Personal Information"). In the course of our business, we may collect Personal Information about you from: • applications or other forms we receive from you, including communications sent through TMX, our web -based transaction management system; • your transactions with, or from the services being performed by us, our affiliates, or others; • a consumer reporting agency, if such information is provided to us in connection with your transaction; and • The public records maintained by governmental entities that we either obtain directly from those entities, or from our affiliates and non -affiliates. Our policies regarding the protection of the confidentiality and security of your Personal Information are as follows: • We restrict access to all Personal Information about you to those employees who need to know that information in order to provide products and services to you. • We maintain physical, electronic and procedural safeguards that comply with federal standards to protect your Personal Information from unauthorized access or intrusion. • Employees who violate our strict policies and procedures regarding privacy are subject to disciplinary action. • We regularly assess security standards and procedures to protect against unauthorized access to Personal Information. WE DO NOT DISCLOSE ANY PERSONAL INFORMATION ABOUT YOU WITH ANYONE FOR ANY PURPOSE THAT IS NOT PERMITTED BY LAW. Consistent with applicable privacy laws, there are some situations in which Personal Information may be disclosed. We may disclose your Personal Information when you direct or give us permission; when we are required by law to do so, for example, if we are served a subpoena; or when we suspect fraudulent or criminal activities. We also may disclose your Personal Information when otherwise permitted by applicable privacy laws such as, for example, when disclosure is needed to enforce our rights arising out of any agreement, transaction or relationship with you. Our policy regarding dispute resolution is as follows: Any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to our privacy policy, or the breach thereof, shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration Association, and judgment upon the award rendered by the arbitrator(s) may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. nut:blank 6/29/2( Page 16 of Commitment For Title Insurance * * Issued by Old Republic National Title Insurance Corporation NOTICE * IMPORTANT -READ CAREFULLY: THIS COMMITMENT IS AN OFFER TO ISSUE ONE OR MORE TITLE INSURANCE POLICIES. ALL CLAIMS OR REMEDIES SOUGHT AGAINST THE COMPANY INVOLVING THE CONTENT OF THIS COMMITMENT OR THE POLICY MUST BE BASED SOLELY IN CONTRACT. THIS COMMITMENT IS NOT AN ABSTRACT OF TITLE, REPORT OF THE CONDITION OF TITLE, LEGAL OPINION, OPINION OF TITLE, OR OTHER REPRESENTATION OF THE STATUS OF TITLE. THE PROCEDURES USED BY THE COMPANY TO DETERMINE INSURABILITY OF THE TITLE, INCLUDING ANY SEARCH AND EXAMINATION, ARE PROPRIETARY TO THE COMPANY, WERE PERFORMED SOLELY FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE COMPANY, AND CREATE NO EXTRACONTRACTUAL LIABILITY TO ANY PERSON, INCLUDING A PROPOSED INSURED. THE COMPANY'S OBLIGATION UNDER THIS COMMITMENT IS TO ISSUE A POLICY TO A PROPOSED INSURED IDENTIFIED IN SCHEDULE A IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS OF THIS COMMITMENT. THE COMPANY HAS NO LIABILITY OR OBLIGATION INVOLVING THE CONTENT OF THIS COMMITMENT TO ANY OTHER PERSON.. COMMITMENT TO ISSUE POLICY Subject to the Notice; Schedule B, Part I —Requirements; Schedule B, Part II —Exceptions; and the Commitment Conditions, Old Republic National Title Insurance Company, a Minnesota corporation (the "Company"), commits to issue the Poky according to the terms and provisions of this Commitment. This Commitment is effective as of the Commitment Date shown in Schedule A for each Policy deserted in Schedule A, only when the Company has entered it Schedule A both the specified doter amount as the Proposed Policy Amount and the name of the Proposed Insured. If all of the Schedule B, Part I —Requirements have not been met within 6 months after the Commitment Date, this Commitment terminates and the Company's lability and oblgation end. COMMITMENT CONDITIONS 1. DEFINITIONS (a)"Knowtedge" or "Known": Actual or imputed knowledge, but not constructive notice imparted by the Pubic Records. (b)"Land": The land described in Schedule A and affixed improvements that by law constitute real properly. The term "Land" does not include any property beyond the Ines of the area deserted in Schedule A. nor any right, title, interest, estate, or easement in abutting streets, roads, avenues, alleys, lanes, ways, or waterways, but this does not modify or limit the extent that a right of access to and from the Land is to be insured by the Policy. (c)"Mortgage": A mortgage, deed of trust, or other security instrument, including one evidenced by electronic means authorized by law. (d) Policy": Each contract of title insurance, in a form adopted by the American Land Title Association, issued or to be issued by the Company pursuant to this Commitment. (e) "Proposed Insured": Each person identified in Schedule A as the Proposed Insured of each Policy to be issued pursuant to this Commitment. (f) "Proposed Policy Amount": Each dollar amount specified in Schedule A as the Proposed Policy Amount of each Policy to be issued pursuant to this Comma Tient. (g)"Pubic Records": Records established under state statutes at the Commitment Date for the purpose of imparting constructive notice of matters relating to real property to purchasers for value and without Knowledge. (h)"Title": The estate or interest deserted in Schedule A. 2. If at of the Schedule B, Part I —Requirements have not been met within the time period specified in the Commitment to Issue Policy, Comitment terminates and the Company's liability and obligation end. 3. The Company's liability and obligation is limited by and this Commitment is not valid without: (a)the Notice; (b)the Commitment to Issue Poky; (c)the Commitment Conditions, (d)Schedule A; (e)Schedule B, Part I —Requirements; and (f) Schedule B, Part II —Exceptions; and (g)a counter -signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form. 4. COMPANY'S RIGHT TO AMEND The Company may amend this Commitment at any time. If the Company amends this Commitment to add a defect, ien, encumbrance, adverse claim, or other matter recorded in the Public Records prior to the Commitment Date, any liability of the Company is limited by Commitment Condition 5. The Company shall not be Sable for any other amendment to this Commitment. 5. LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY (a)The Company's liability under Commitment Condition 4 is limited to the Proposed Insured's actual expense incurred in the interval between the Company's delivery to the Proposed Insured of the Commitment and the delivery of the amended Commitment, resulting from the Proposed Insured's good faith reliance to: i. comply with the Schedule B. Part I —Requirements; ii. eliminate, with the Company's written consent, any Schedule B, Part II —Exceptions; or IL acquire the Title or create the Mortgage covered by this Commitment. (b)The Company shall not be liable under Commitment Condition 5(a) if the Proposed Insured requested the amendment or had Knowledge of the matter and did not notify the Company about it in writing. (c)The Company will only have liability under Commitment Condition 4 it the Proposed Insured would not have incurred the expense had the Commitment included the added matter when the Commitment was first delivered to the Proposed Insured. >ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 17 of (d)The Company's liability shall not exceed the lesser of the Proposed Insured's actual expense incurred in good faith and descrbed in Commitment Conditions 5(a)() through 5(a)(ii) or the Proposed Poky Amount. (e)The Company shad not be table for the content of the Transaction Identification Data, if any. (f) In no event shad the Company be obligated to issue the Policy referred to in this Commitment unless al of the Schedule B, Part I —Requirements have been met to the satisfaction of the Company. (g)In any event, the Company's lability is tinted by the terms and provisions of the Policy. 6. LIABILITY OF THE COMPANY MUST BE BASED ON THIS COMMITMENT (a)Only a Proposed Insured identified in Schedule A, and no other person, may make a claim under this Commitment. (b)Any claim must be based in contract and must be restricted solely to the terms and provisions of this Commitment. (c)Unti the Policy is issued, this Commitment, as last revised, is the exclusive and entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter of this Commitment and supersedes al prior commitment negotiations, representations, and proposals of any kind, whether written or oral, express or implied, relating to the subject matter of this Commitment. (d)The deletion or modification of any Schedule B, Part II —Exception does not constitute an agreement or obligation to provide coverage beyond the terms and provisions of this Commitment or the Policy. (e)Any amendment or endorsement to this Commitment must be in writing and authenticated by a person authorized by the Company. (f) When the Policy is issued, all liability and obligation under this Commitment wit end and the Company's only liabtity wit be under the Policy. 7. IF THIS COMMITMENT HAS BEEN ISSUED BY AN ISSUING AGENT The issuing agent is the Company's agent only for the ended purpose of issuing title insurance commitments and policies. The issuing agent is not the Company's agent for the purpose of providing closing or settlement services. 8. PRO -FORMA POLICY The Company may provide, at the request of a Proposed Insured, a pro -forma policy ustratng the coverage that the Company may provide. A pro -forma policy neither reflects the status of Title at the time that the pro -forma policy is delivered to a Proposed Insured, nor is it a commitment to insure. 9. ARBITRATION The Poicy contains an arbitration clause. AN arbitrable matters when the Proposed Policy Amount is $2,000,000 or less shad be arbitrated at the option of ether the Company or the Proposed Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. A Proposed Insured may review a copy of the arbitration rules at http://www.alta.orgiarbitration. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Land Title Insurance Corporation has caused its corporate name and seal to be affixed by its duly authorized officers on the date shown in Schell le A to be valid when countersigned by a validating officer or other authorized signatory. Issued by: Land Title Guarantee Company 3033 East First Avenue Suite 600 Denver, Colorado 80206 303-321-1880 President Old Republic National Title Insurance Company, a Stock Company 400 Second Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612)371-1111 Mark Bilbrey, President Rande Yeager, Secretary This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA® Commitment for Title Insurance issued by Land Title Insurance Corporation. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule B, Part I —Requirements; and Schedule B, Part II —Exceptions; and a counter -signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form. Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. Al rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in goad standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 1 c 441 Third Street P.O. Box 626 970-535-4477 Mead, CO 80542 www.townofinead.org ZONI\G AMENDMENT TECHNICAL ( RFFERLA FORM Project Name The Highlands Project Address and Legal Description Generally south and adjacent to CR 36 approximately midway between 1-25 and CR 7. Amendment type: O Text Map Date Submitted Fees Submitted Please provide the following to the Town Clerk with this checklist form. For additional information, refer to 16-3-116 of the Mead Town Code. X X NA X X X X X 1. Five (5) copies of the complete zoning amendment application package, in individual D -ring binders, to the Town Clerk 2. All maps, legal descriptions and surrounding property owner information on 3 CDs. 3. For a zoning text change, a written description of the proposed change to the text of Article 3, Chapter 16 of the Mead Land Use Code 4. Current title commitment dated no more than thirty (30) days from the date of the application submittal. 5. A zoning amendment map of the area included in the proposed change, twenty-four (24) inches high by thirty-six (36) inches wide, with the following information: North arrow, scale (1" = 100' or 1" = 200'), and date of preparation. The subdivision or block and lot name of the area to be zoned (if applicable) at the top of each sheet. Legal description of area to be zoned. Zoning Amendment Technical Criteria Form 08/09 Page 1 of 3 nut:blank 6/29/2( Page 2 e X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Location and boundaries, including dimensions, of the property(s) proposed for rezoning. The acreage or square footage contained within the property proposed for rezoning. All existing land uses in the proposed rezoning area. Zoning and existing land uses on all lands adjacent to the proposed rezoning. The location and dimensions for all existing public rights -of -way including streets, and centerlines of water -courses within and adjacent to the rezoning. The names of all adjoining subdivisions with lines of abutting lots, and departing property lines of adjoining properties not subdivided. Certificate blocks for Surveyor, Planning Commission, Board of Trustees, and County Clerk and Recorder. An AutoCADTM drawing file of the zoning amendment map. A written statement describing the proposal and addressing the following points: Need for the proposed rezoning; Present and future impacts on the existing adjacent zone districts, uses, and physical character of the surrounding area; Impact of the proposed zone on area accesses and traffic patterns; Availability of utilities for any potential development; Present and future impacts on public facilities and services, including, but not limited to, fire, police, water, sanitation, roadways, parks, and schools; The relationship between the proposal and the Town Comprehensive Plan; and Public benefits arising from the proposal. 6. Land Ilse Application Form and Application Fee Zoning Amendment Technical Criteria Form 08/09 Page 2 of 3 nut:blank 6/29/2( Page 3 c X X 7. A current list (not more than thirty (30) days old) of the names and addresses of the surrounding property owners (within three hundred (300) feet of the property), mineral estate owners and appropriate ditch companies in an ExcelTM spreadsheet. 8. Signed Fee Agreement Form and Deposit Applicant Certification Sign in blue ink. Attach additional pages with certification language and signatures if more than two applicants. I (We) certify this application a all submittals hereto are complete and accurate. Applicant(s Date Applicant(s) Date Staff Use Only Upon acceptance of this application by the Town as a complete application, a copy of this form, with anticipated hearing dates, shall be provided to the applicant by the Town. Anticipated hearing dates may not be actual hearing dates depending upon referral comments received by the Town. Application Accepted Date Fees Accepted Date Amount By Application Determined Complete Date By Planning Commission Public Hearing Date Board of Trustees Public Hearing Date By 1. Applicant submits forty-four (44) copies, nineteen (19) of which are bound in D -ring binders, of the application to the Town Clerk. 2. Town Clerk sends notice of public hearing. 3. Town Clerk publishes notice in a newspaper of general circulation. 4. The applicant posts signs on property. A picture and affidavit of posting signed and dated by the applicant submitted to the Town Clerk. 5. Applicant submits three (3) 24" x 36" mylars, one paper copy and an electronic CD of the zoning amendment map to the Town Clerk after Board of Trustee approval. Zoning Amendment Technical Criteria Form 08/09 Page 3 of 3 )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 1 e May 25, 2018 Erika Rasmussen, Town Engineer Town of Mead 441 Third Street Mead, CO 80542 RE: The Highlands (Gallegos Parcel) Prosper Land Development Weld County Parcel #'s: 120710000035, 120710000055 NW'/4 Section 10, T3N, R68W of the 6th P.M. JVA Job Number: 1970.94c Dear Erika: JVA, Incorporated 1319 Spruce Street Boulder, CO 80302 303 444.1951 info@Jvajva.coin www.jvajva.com This letter is in response to the request for wastewater sanitary sewer commitment for residential service to the proposed Highlands development located south of County Road 36, east of County Road 7, and west of the Coyote Run subdivision. The proposed development is approximately 65 acres in size and 225 single family residential lots are proposed based on the concept plan provided. This wastewater service commitment letter is for the development referenced above. The above referenced property is within the Town of Mead 208 service area and will be served contingent upon submission and approval of the following: • Execution of a Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) • Final Utility Report • Final Public Improvement Construction Plans • Final Plat • Procurement and dedication of any necessary easements to the Town of Mead • Construction of all sanitary sewer lines to serve the property in accordance with the current Town of Mead Design Standards and Construction Specifications • Payment of all tap and plant investment fees An existing 18" PVC sanitary main is located on the subject property and a 24 -inch PVC main is located east of the property south of the Coyote Run Subdivision. The onsite and downstream sanitary trunk mains are adequately sized to accept the influent flows for this development. As part of the development, the applicant shall construct a 12 -inch PVC main connecting near the east property line at SAMH 00182 and extending westerly to County Road 7 (CR7). This 12 - inch main shall serve the proposed development and future upstream development. Any potential reimbursement for the required upsizing of the main shall be detailed in the Subdivision Improvement Agreement. All additional mains required to serve the proposed development shall be minimum 8 -inch in size. Refer to the attached exhibit for an approximate layout of the required 1 2 -inch trunk line. The existing Mead Wastewater Treatment Facility (MWWTF) has adequate capacity for the proposed development. The permitted capacity is 0.5 million gallons per day (MGD). Service will be subject to the Town of Mead Land Development Code. Policy. Rules and Regulations. All construction shall comply with the current Town of Mead Design Standards )ut: blank 6/29/2( Page 2 C The Highlands Wastewater Commitment Letter May 25, 2018 2 of 2 and Construction Specifications. This commitment letter will expire after one year from the date of this letter. If you have any comments or questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, JVA, INCORPORATED By: Kenneth J ifford. Town Engineering Consultant Enclosure: Highlands Wastewater Exhibit )ut:blank 6/29/2( • t.i Acres • 225 Dwelling Unit. .;.46 111 1/ Ac Ac. Open Space includes 5.78 ac Park. • Typical A Lot time: StY x 110* t' 161 Lot + 1t)On(.orrtcr: • Typical B Lot Sin: (dY z I IS' r•? 4, + Ill' On ( omen xtend 12xtend 2" Main to CR7 .wa_ a ► a_ - _ �r xrra_� a tea• ell, a aa_a a a aaIr. _ a MIS a ir 1 L.....1 rt • \ _ a..__r•iEli 1 t ;ice\ 1 155.. 1 T r-rre ... ;rt .j.. -�H..154..� • !10•. -� 1••••$•iits, • f SARK 1 T-- z-t-TiTT-r-r-T an faun 77 -r-rit,/ ',Tin, 1 t an Try\ :--- ‘41-1 \*- . Li Liiiiii _u_...1 4.----. -,,,..t.....1. ILL .L.I....1.1 --) se......i_LisiL• n._1.1..__L J _ I _L . _ U. J _1__ 1 i _ t_1 ui,...4.1_,Lr_,../. a i_i_ii ----+ 1 Li --i r t r4 Liiiri \N--__ 73 ___L , 1-, --r c ar-r--1 r _d JiltL--- • Existin 1I .18" Ma —1,\ PARKa • 123 ACRES a tr. Mead Mead, Colorado Conceptual Site Plan •.:. sr, It 2111,. &IS t' a IVO ••••• ••, \3/41-, \—.„ DEtENT!ON I 9 £ t t Page 3 c 01/4 ne4 r PROSPER I$[ •ENor oE:gilt!■4I0or k utfy i'190 I le , 4 :•H:kL9i?f6! 1 tt �. I4 :4X! I 1(I :b ��f )Llt:hlank 6/29/2( Nue4c Directors: Bill Szmyd, President Steve Brandenburg Larry Brandt Paul Bukowski Ed Martens William Prewitt Little Thompson Water District March 12, 2018 District Manager: Michael T. Cook 835 E Highway 56 Berthoud, CO 80513 P: 970-532-2096 F: 970-532-3734 vvww.LTX/VD.org Joe Stiffer 428 Kimbark Street Longmont, CO 80501 joeprosper1anddev. corn Dear Mr. Stiffer: This letter is in response to your request for a water service commitment for two hundred twenty five 5/8" urban residential services. This water service commitment is for the property generally located south and east of corner of Weld County Road 7 (WCR 7) and WCR 36, Mead, Colorado or more generally described as follows: PORTION OF THE N 'A of SEC. 10, T3N, R68W -- WELD COUNTY, CO Parcel 12071000005 5and Parcel 120710000035 The District provides water service within its service area as defined by the District. The provision of water service by extension of existing water lines of the District to the above property and the installation of taps for lots is done under the terms of the Rules and Regulations of the District established by the Board of the District from time to time. You may obtain a copy of the Rules and Regulations from the District. This letter outlines the provisions of the Rules and Regulations, however this letter does not change any provisions of the Rules and Regulations. The Board of the District may alter and amend the Rules and Regulations at any time, and the provisions of this letter are subject to alteration and amendment based on changes in the Rules and Regulations of the District. We own and operate an 8 -inch line along WCR 7 that extends along the property frontage and an 8 - inch line along WCR 36 that extends along the northern property frontage. We also own and operate an 8 -inch line in Coyote Run near the western end of Hughes Drive and an 8 -inch line in Falcon Circle in Feather Ridge Estates. We can commit to provide service to the above property, subject to the limitations in this letter, for 225 residential 5/8 -inch urban taps; and the following additional limitations on the provision of water service: 1. All improvements to District facilities required to provide service will be the financial responsibility of the developer in accordance with the District Rules and Regulations. All improvements must conform to District Specifications. • Prior to initiating water service, you will need to provide evidence that the property is included in the Municipal Sub District of the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District. You can find information on having your property included in the Municipal Sub District at the offices of the Nort c ii Colorado Water Conservancy. nut:blank 6/29/2( Page 5 a 3. Little Thompson Water District typically does not accept cash in lieu payments for water rights for developments. The developer will be required to provide water rights to meet the minimum projected needs of the proposed development at 0.35 acre-feet for each urban 5/8 -inch tap resulting in a net raw water dedication requirement of 78.75 acre-feet. None the raw water dedication identified above includes any water for irrigation systems in open spaces or other community buildings/facilities. If such water is desired, it should be evaluated later. Currently the District has a cash in lieu option available for a limited time. Please contact Nancy Koch to discuss options for water dedication for the property. 4. The development should be served by waterline connections to the west at Hughes Drive, to the east at WCR 7, to the north at WCR 36, and to the south along Falcon Circle. 5. Where fire hydrants are required for the site, there is a $2,000 per fire hydrant fee that needs to be paid prior to installation of the fire hydrant (installed by your contractor). 6. A 20 -foot wide (minimum) easement shall be required for the proposed waterlines that transverse the property outside Town of Mead rights -of -way. This commitment letter will expire two years from the date of this letter if the taps have not been purchased, paid for and installed by that date of expiration. The current fee for one urban residential 5/8" tap is $7,450 with installation provided by the Developer. This does not include the required raw water dedication as identified above and required per the District's Rules and Regulations. YOU ARE HEREBY ADVISED THAT THE RULES, REGULATIONS AND TARIFFS OF THE DISTRICT ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE; AND THIS LETTER IS ISSUED WITH THE SPECIFIC LIMITATION THAT THE DISTRICT MAY CHANGE THE RULES, REGULATIONS AND TARIFFS APPLICABLE TO THE ABOVE PROPERTY AT ANY TIME WITHOUT NOTICE TO YOU OR ANY PERSON. If you have questions, please contact me. Regards, Amber'Kauffman, PE District Engineer nut:blank 6/29/2( Page 6 a INiT- 0 DOWER Your Touchstone Energy' Cooperative May 9,2018 Mr. Joe Stiffer Prosper Land and Development 428 Kimbark Street Longmont, CO 80501 Dear Mr. Stiffer: United Power is the provider of electric service in the area to the proposed residential subdivision, located at the south east corner of County Rd 7 and County Rd 36. There is electrical distribution in the area that may or may not need to be upgraded, depending on the requirements of the site, in order to provide capacity and safe reliable power to the area. Service will be provided according to the rules, regulations, and policies in effect by United Power at the time service is requested. We look forward to this opportunity to provide electric service. If you have any questions, please give me a call at 303-637-1317. Sincerely, Jared Odom Project Manager - West Division JKO:hkh i.,0t4TF..o pow >ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 7 0 Xcel Energy May 25, 2018 Prosper Land and Development 428 Kimbark Street Longmont, CO 80501 Re: Will serve letter for Prosper Land and Development Dear Adam, In accordance with our tariffs filed with and approved by the Colorado Public Utilities Commission, Gas facilities can be made available to serve your project at the Prosper Land and Development. Service will be provided after engineering is completed, payment is received, any easements are signed and construction can be completed. We will have better information available after design has been completed as to a scheduled in-service date. 111 can be of further assistance, please contact me at (303) 961-4056. Sincerely, Adam Carpio Q3 Contracting Mailing address: Public Service Company of Colorado 400 Washington St Alamosa, CO 81101 1,ton.Junr mut:blank 6/29/2( Page 1 c LEGAL DESCRIPTION: KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT STELLA S. GALLEGOS FAMILY TRUST AND PETE GALLEGOS, BEING THE OWNERS OF CERTAIN LANDS IN WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS, EXCEPT FOR PUBLIC RIGHTS -OF -WAY: PARCEL I: THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 100 ACRES OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO EXCEPTING THOSE PARCELS CONVEYED BY DEEDS RECORDED SEPTEMBER 15.2005 AT RECEPTION NO. 3323096 AND JULY 5, 2017 AT RECEPTION NO. 4315144. NOW KNOWN AS: LOT B, RECORDED EXEMPTION NO. 1207 -10 -2 -RE -2579, RECORDED NOVEMBER 16, 2000 AT RECEPTION NO. 2807299, LOCATED IN THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO. A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE WEST SIXTEENTH CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 10; THENCE NORTH 00°23'44" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 25.51 FEET ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF SECTION 10; THENCE NORTH 89°07'24" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 00°23'54" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 302.29 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°51'54" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1729.99 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°52'22" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 879.52 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°24'21" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 821.96 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°54'27" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 2293.98 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°24'42" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 341.63 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°07'50" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 14.76 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01°46'59" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 175.22 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°07'28" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 307.43 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL CONTAINS 1,981,309 SQUARE FEET OR 45.485 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. nut:blank 6/29/2( Page 2 0 PARCEL II: A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE WEST SIXTEENTH CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 10; THENCE NORTH 00°23'44" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 25.51 FEET ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF SECTION 10; THENCE NORTH 89°07'24" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°23'54" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 302.29 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°51'54" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1729.99 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 00°23'54" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 960.02 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°52'10" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 879.40 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°24'21" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 960.07 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 88°52'22" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 879.52 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL CONTAINS 844,258 SQUARE FEET OR 19.381 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. HAVE LAID OUT THIS ZONING AMENDMENT MAP OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED LAND UNDER THE NAME AND STYLE OF THE HIGHLANDS. THE CHANGE IN ZONING SHALL BE FROM THE EXISTING ZONING OF AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL ZONING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 16, OF THE MEAD MUNICIPAL CODE. THUS DESCRIBED ZONING AMENDMENT MAP CONTAINS 2,825,567 SQUARE FEET OR 64.866 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, TOGETHER WITH AND SUBJECT TO ALL EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS -OF -WAY EXISTING AND/OR OF PUBLIC RECORD. mut:blank 6/29/2( t' U ll PLAN Page 1 0 LEGAL DESCRIPPION PARCEL I THE NORTH I/2 OF THE SOUTH 100 ACRES OF THE NN 114 OF SECTION IS TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 60 WEST OF THE 6TH P M COUNTY OF WELD STATE OF COLORADO EXCEPTING THOSE PARCELS CONVEYED BY DEEDS RECORDED SEPTEMBER 15 2041 AT RECEPTION NO 3323058 AND JULY 5 2917 AT RECEPTION NO 4315144 NOW KNOWN AS LOT B RECORDED EXEMPTION NO 1311 THERE 2510 RECORDED NOVEMBER 18 2801 AT RECEPTION NO 2807208 LOCATED W THE NW IN OF SECTION 10 TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6117 P M COUNTY OF WELD STATE OF COLORADO A PARCEL OF LAID LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10 TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE BB WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL NERIUOW WELD COUNTY COLORADO AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS COIMENCING AT TILE WEST SHTEENTH CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST 114 OF SECTION I0 THENCE NORTH 0012344 WEST A DISTANCE OF 2651 FEET ALONG SAID WEST UNE OF SECTION 10 THENCE NORTH 5r0714 EAST A DISTANCE OF 3000 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING THENCE NORTH 00.2.154 WEST A DISTANCE OF 302.29 FEET THENCE NORTH 913151 EAST A DISTANCE OF 1229 BB FEET THENCE NORTH BB 5222• EAST A DISTANCE OF 870 52 FEET THENCE SOUTH 00.2421 EAST ADISTANCE OF EAT 96 FEET THENCE SOUTH 66342T WEST A DISTANCE OF 2293 88 FEET THENCE NORTH 00'2447 EAST A DISTANCE OF 341 63 FEET THFtCH SOUTH 89'0750. WEST A DISTANCE OF 14 76 FEET THENCE NORTH 61 40 SO' EAST A DISTANCE OF 17522 FEET THENCE SOUTH RNLI WEST A DISTANCE Of 107.43 FEETTO THE POINT OFBESITWING. THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL CONTAINS 1801,309 SQUARE FEET DR 45485 ACRES MORE OR LESS PARCEL IL A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED W THE NORTHWEST QUARTER 0A SECTION 10 TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 81H PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN WELD COUNTY COLORADO AND BEIKS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS COMMENCING AD THE WEST SIXTEENTH CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST 1N OF SECTION 1E THENCE NORTH 002344 WEST A INSTANCE OF 2551 FEET KONG SAID WEST ONE OF SECTION 10 THENCE NORTH 85OT24 EAST AOISTANCE OF 35.40 FEET THENCE NORTH302354 WEST A DISTANCE OF 31220 FEET THENCE NORTH 583134 EAST A DISTANCE OF 172998 FEETTO THE POINT OF BEGINNING THENCE NORTH 00'2354 WEST A DISTANCE OF 69002 FEET THENCE NORTH 90'52'10" EAST A DISTANCE OF BIB 40 FEET 1HUNLE SOUTH 00'2431 EAST A DISTANCE OF 680 07 FEET THENCE SOUTH BB 5227 WEST A DISTANCE OF 87052 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL CONTAINS 844 258 SQUARE FEET OR 10381 ACRES MORE OR LESS THE HIGHLANDS A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10 TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH P M TOWN OF MEAD COUNTY OF WELD STATE OF COLORADO 64 866 ACRES TOTAL 220 SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING UNITS CER1 IFICA7 IONS fan. WY alo.n Ram. Pon. IR.N...1a . Mena L.m ATTICA OIl. noon NO.. u ..2.. Ns...w DlNos J, ftemz n I rn. BNA P r .un UN.B.wa w.m.r,. v.nBPmww B..w.A J .0 J... nes of Cola •J Ca NHWe4 u, a m 4.141 ODEaW ABID. 01.00 Pun lOLA a 007011.303 .r4. P.RYmn__ na 4.W I m_ Cr wirten avarl 550. Fdm nu I.Nip In Hy .aH11Nu..4P .4 na.a.a paw main,. Calmed Rel.. AMN4.o.marx.a w..o 4r n.J nra�i..604 pan.... a.mm VICINITY MAP HOT TO SCALE COIART ROLD 58 ii �9}9 §,,, 4 I I „, r �� r UO IIrr• COUGY RCND 31 SHEET INDEX 1 COVER SHEET 2 CONTEXT & ZONING MAP 3 PUD PLAN 4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 5 CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN 6 GRADING MASTER PLAN 7 UTILITY MASTER PLAN PROSPER LANDS DEVELOPMENT TLC s IOpp ESUIIIA CONSULTING GXIJLP TiL RasLim e.1.4bCS COVER SHEET 1 of 7 )ut blank 6/29/2( I I • I I I 1 g • • I 1 I • • l tit fIUt-iL INuN A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10 TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH P M TOWN OF MEAD. COUNTY OF WELD. STATE OF COLORADO 64.866 ACRES TOTAL 220 SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING UNITS • a I • , i 1 a -...� -�-------.�--- -- -r _- - .-�.�- --- ----- `.--rte • • I 1 S1 ta•1. aiat> Cra iai 1 { I I I I I • 1 1 I 1 I f$uDENTUL �.•PRIMLY �DETAACC► E4 1 IJNINCORPORATIO IWO UX • 1 1 1 1 he R&i- r ' r I Orta I. • II i • 1 1 I 1 I 1 r��t1MffiI L'T'": • %, 1/4—.41• • • • i 1 I Ire, .oaAit Dew ; Ss Oslo M ;,cam',, • • Nat ••• •• • • �• ♦\• ♦ :�• `♦- ••� • `••�--.—_ -- ♦ . •--` .: ♦--- iFr�1 1• 1 • I • • • r saam4r.ww• •t:(SS* llonv \ 1/4 \ 9 kkt. I i t I• ` • J •< 11 1• • • jea a ill ,! 1 t.. }� 1 t 1 It --s5-- �- - ��'��<� r�c� a ii IO�ZQtj�l • • • • • • \ it,•1 • ' • \ • `11 tIV\` •\ 1• ti ♦ .4. 4.• ••♦• - • l c-' a- __ • • •• a r • • it •• `• j w-. 1 •t • - ♦ ♦ • 1 / 1 1 r t I f i de e ; .0/If ' / J / ,' at _t� / /t 'r• 'a II ----a- - 'r+-+� / � \ l I1 1 1 1 ! r I / / f l/ ./ i / ▪ r/ /� r i / ▪ i r• ' / r ` •�\� �•t \4 ••\••\ \ 1 • rale i { ! \•a� 1 I f '; 4\ 't s; I I 1 1 f•r-r • LAN + D EVEL�\IPAdS VL•O I9 �,'' •. a • • 1 •\\• \ •• / `�`�► RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMtYC)£IALPEP UNINCORPORATED WELD COVrl1 r •1 • • • A ♦ 14 III 11 1 I , •1a • `;11;1111.1.1t1;\‘'• i ; ' J -a--- , A a1 111,I,t,:1,`\ 411./i/ /; • ; l • t`,. ‘ • ... . �• ♦ `•:•t \ ♦`w• --bra-• I 11.�� a • • { .��•♦• •�.4•1, •••:C �� ;\ 11 4 IS 11 Floc �\• ` rr •,.-.,•••%;„•,•••.:%•-••::::•-•,,.- �� ,♦ ~\mil �`� �y 1 iS --- %11,11,.1 al + « r r LP 111,11 I1, ♦ f ,+ -+ - y 7 < • -1 ` \11, �• 1.• \\ t •\ + N• 1 1 •1 t • 1 • ir* • \ • 1 ••',,i,'„; ` 1 1 ♦ I/ 1 • • FCC Na 206,801 \ •••.raw- . `-, ••'., • :L•••• \•:•••••, • •t . • ii • u es • • itwc trzmo,p--- art • • 4 '1 ail 300 4111 Loma face Loma CU *kW Saki nutp•seakalk• Obit il•Gatft* I 4.14 than foal is* Atli Ole SYMMS Ivl iLANDS arms 713 '-e- plat ak-4140ta CONTEXT MAP 6/29/2( r- • 1 I • L 4D 4D ffffff. 1 t I 1 1 I I / 1 ( ( 1 I t ( • TRAt CO*wECTCN t ht t11VtiLI%INuN A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10. TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6Th P M.. TOWN OF MEAD. COUNTY OF WELD. STATE OF COLORADO 64.866 ACRES TOTAL 220 SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING UNITS 7 • r a ea •parr • ._ ..e - -_.Mb... 1 Sir atss= Y 4, I I 1 1 • • . • w • • ( I a wl 4 b s <N a vAr a. U. a • I 1 ( 1 ( I OPEN SPACE & LANDSCAPE Bur FEN 1 • I I 1 I LEGEND Alt —• ,AtaC.APE iiLIFct 1 4 VENICUARACCESS POINT ...a. TRAIL CONNECTION w 1 1 1 — I P • • Chow *AI S1IROA1 Mat r C Yn !164/01? Gad& MAW ail&Cr ION / / 1 • SI ri0 `GV Page 3 0 ,tbItLt! Nt.I1( 1-h Caton Mica Latissai. Cu WC '•4 ER 11A CONSUL 1 IM. (i{tC1l P. La st+ unit � %act swot nw ';11473,S1Ti I misiSt awe arm 0s A Walt 0(..1>JQY PUD PLAN 3 of 7 )ut:blank 6/2912( Page 4 c 1 tit ti l t, ri nix !N U > I. GENERAL iNIENI The Highlands Subdivision e propdaad a faring friendly negttoothodd that pandas a variety 01 detainee srtgle tamIy homes °peons 1 he piai press bur (4) pocket parts and a neighborhood park what ate Irtasctiessaed at1 open space commons and bailie I he pts.lpeuly IS surrounded at as aides by easing r proposed ressfensai development Pedestrian and .enr:utar aatrwceons are povwdec ate the agar -ant eighrocnaods to Prate a sense d comrnisty and to not separate this neignoornood from me enurig neiseents s In n the T own of Mead ail compliance wttdt the general intent of the Town's Cornprenensve Plan Die PUD proncles the I own writ a c smarted and fairnpnreu s aeve4opnsent wilco wet beat plaints tine near safety order convenience prosperity and general tease at es residents 1 tie Pi j respalds to Ira dais and policies at the Ccmprenensive Plan and is planned to ensure nigh quality Jevesopm*eu corrvatble web me surrounding aria uses and the natwrai eneionment AUTHORITY A Approval of Plans Upon approved of and adoption of ms i2ut) Dy, rite Town d Mead Soars of Trustees this document snail become the gbverrWty zoning document tot the dove iopment of ail uses careen The regnards Atiy item not covered by these stipulations seas be yuver nee by Die Town at Meru: tainicipal Maxie B CoiWtrcts tow provisions or this PUD snail pentad and govern the development 31 1 he rtigl'Nn06 POD pruvrr76d newest' where int olIJVSrais of ale MUD do rx l dearly addrest a Specter subseathe provisions at the Item a Mead Mwnicepa1 Lode for rte unitttyng Lures Ui5trfct limit apply as oath riehet7 by the L unoedyln{r Lone Districts in he ur.4S1ryung ! Coatis 1.54 Mead Lorne Labtract is rissoerto 4iRSF-4j GENERAL REQUIREMENTS A Landscaping Loui ea sty de*Dlgn elerntants et contribute to making The Hesitan e a yluaMty c mmurety These elements Witt include weenie park amenity areas connecting open space corridors landscaped entry features and mdrturneriation appropriate geeing pedestrian and becyne cWa. lcui paatwstreet uses n font of earth runeuniform pexvnste brk:ng and other appropriate design features The pansy Manage c ffw aMl be Sped with naive or (Inland grasses and scattered tent trees The teen statements Wei* are proposed at the access part wee lie neghtorreocid kom County Road 38 and County Raid 7 Pisa arras will include an entry monument sign wen landscaping to panto a sense of a ivS IMO the liergrwurraood Malfeetearer;e of there is en splice areas and rat kite ti plr Si rme be the I eti f %oissmty of tree IKYntriwrret s drwsutiatteln antra matr0 *aria to be established to this . ixlitltaaltty the mime below anal instals bait yard Ian cscapng avid aaetomatrC singleton systems as Meows 1 An average of une i i i decaouucts nee cs every testy $0) lineal teat of tree lawn n Wont o1 the name a portion thereof *aced an the location or Use driveway utilly mama* area see say Mangle t Seven t 7 r seriscape struts for the front yard seised. d earl homey 4 Sod for the Walt yard setback of each 'tome 5_ Inert stank tae a mrarraum of seventy -eve pecan* t75%e eve mareriars between the trail of the house and the curb tiles otherwise approved try the Town O Tne aulcrnatra rrlyatiaa system shall be from the domestic, tap Poi me merle ' The rxtrn4 reined shad man the meowing rarldscaprsg a 'retie , emeindes Of yard and is a Caaiaged to plant additional trees. shrubs arxo Hicereers using xertwcepe outdoes and tote geneva l oruvrsiale set forth in Town reguaancin5 b Maenta n tree yard aria landscaping wthsr, try actacent road right-of-way rn ac:c°sdance sr Town B Fencing i rna Stang program tot The tighlends earn be d a c ntesteru design and coior trurx4 lout the negnborttood and snail noise me blowing I a=eraciree tea r etsedealtar lots weennn The Highlands shag A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10 TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH P M TOWN OF MEAD. COUNTY OF WELD STATE OF COLORADO 64.866 ACRES TOTAL 220 SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING UNITS be vinyl or maned wood Vinyl a wood fencing snail be of a aoro: cariplennetsary b the primary Cantor or the homes etas me neighborhood Perimeter privacy lances shall be mgr a stifle woad a mailman a 6 lest in height Where lances or ditlartng heights abut. She taller fence shelf taper rat a awarttum 2 1 ratio) b the sleight or the owe fence 3 Open Rat Mincing stall be .anyl a starred wood rants a nennrum of 4. feet a, Iheagnt on property adyacern to eternal open space 4 internal 1a dills tencrty snail be vinyl or stained wood ;,rr acv a raii and snail be •.A a coneistenl aesrcri. ▪ trail Connections Pedestrian and OK cve access we be provided vaa a fret connexion a the southeast caner of Me see to tits regional trait Anew swewas along fee east site dt County Road 7 es provide a peueslrtan connection to the exists g trait along the south side d r eaner Ridge Scnavision and a pedestrian way into the core d i own Trait linkages are pra.tded throughout the Internal open speCtepalk areas of The Highlands The torus at these fiat cunneeUons 6 to connect pedestrians tram the detained seaewalks agony the internal streets to me poxzet parks U Parks and Open Space A total at 15 53 was (23 115%) a tna site area Is paned to open space and parks A 3 t -acts netynbornoo0 park aiM oe me Gentrar gahering space for the nelgnbcsn :Id I ne park wt include a mute -purls play ha picnic sneltw ono piaygta.n° The pant es bordered try seders On MOM sides creating a vsstlle and sassy at:Assaole park Tree cxaielecncns alto SidesalkS lie into the park trait as porbat5 ul me nelghoafoua E Density In cwtlpsarnre With the Town s Canprerlensae Piai Lean dated March 2018. a flat d 220 dwesirly unite are propose° at e gross da isty at 3 :Ai dweareg unto lei &Jet IV COMMUNITY DESIGN PRINCIPLES MU) DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The blowing mass now the proposed PUt) new ewe Rohr Antis-Il Corrvnutety Uesrgra and Development Standards as stated wltbWi Inc Town of Mead Municipal Code A kesedenual Archeect e- Singes Family Detached i rte rfitern wttkrl I nt ightailsM PU) and Sut.avin r 1 e5 ti trim manes of eatsous a crrtedural cleaves that relate W the street geld create dnersrty arid rawly Sprig residential sheets Many a the napes snail nave front parchesbtaijyered aettialMMU senattar al getout placementand a variety of uaao3ni } that reneecto traditional Coioraao styles grid neighborhoods These PUD stant:NS are intended to ensure trim art adequate mei or moos and styles ate dieted within tie neighbdrtla3d and meal coal block lace The asaoo its included herein vary sightly barn the Towns diversity requirements as abated in Ante H Community Design and Devearp neat Ste elands aline the Town of Mead Murraapei Cult Ire devreldpetabusder, along stn the lost thee enforce these rege.serne nib as wideveduat hones are OUR on sad bits items not Steal snail comply *tin Town Standards 1 Muuei Orver5t- for tvud:ks waster Ulan U Ms A Otact Is darted by intersecting streets a open space tracts a LaC1i DICK 1ai a stead contain at ieaasl tilts \41 deferent allodels that nave aefnetere vlefuNDaeb al lice, piaci configuration and massing UthettsSGaber err ,naleis requites three (3) at the lob e-zig variations t Eavatkic 2 Sae 3 Cato scheme 4 Use of eatenOr maleness S Hoot ern: 6 Massing b Earl side of the blocs snail contain no mire than free (31 of fee same Deriding ng elevations with the saute arctrwoctwal style C Die same model *eh the same architecture; se'rrauc s snail t eat De placed adfat snt to each dine or directly across In. street from are another d Eacte slime model seas nave at east two ce) elev'aiots to prcivxle 9tykstic diversity. Thus may induce I Hoof twrseines arc ct one L varied ear`doar and tiaaY Sry'IBS S der le.i entry treatments arc locations rrrcio auirj rxratctiea _aAxaru5 a'ia 4 Sayre arid two-story ratacte5 a The mass of the house shwa strongly retied tine wttetea wrali style and De soared to provwe vtsr,dl mares and deprn, reduce Dotrtess and a:pilaw.; a articulated Sarni on the :font art° carter bales at ate homes in Plannng Areal and the irons t. ears and corner saes in Planning Area 2 t Enhancements on elevations brim oe prowes° km hones on carter foes that sides a street or park Corner lots shat be wide erkaugtl Le allow for See eievaY(>f1 erVliwlcernerns Al least two }2) of the blowing ettha icerme±.t5 are required 1 Aside or asap around path us d bay window 2 Windows or gazed coots that tace the ode sliest or park 3 A change rn tree vertical or horizontal wall plane 4 biacaets projections. belt COUNT'S Or titter such Jest yi Homes not garages shat be emphasized or readenttai streets v anat o ns at garage piac emeent a� relation to isle lace at the structure itLln be ample mente.0 air-,ng the block taco to mnch.de garage Outs garage toreard ano recessed garages Alternate load garages are encouraged tut not regimen it Garage cloaca shat not comprise more than 52% fa a tray -car garage and 55% bit a three --car garage of the Street fang sear budding frontage fora 50400t-wtara lot. aid 45% for a two aril yaraye and 50% for a three- car garage of tile: street racahg Meat Draldfng frontage bol a ai toot wide tut 1 reee ::at garages shall not have the sane Rant taoaoe plane :one garage Day snail be at least two teen at set eons the two tat, garage and be separated by a eat at teas: two test sloe The Cant wail ut a acne tom,x& or evertor Dourt yard loaded garage may encroach the Iron yard setback up to eta feet I rte bide of the garage Wing the Meat shat include etrWove a as arlYMectaat delasls meat ernes We otter awry portions of tie o esewig V. RESIDENTIAL DENSITY AND UttitENSIONAL STANDARDS 1ON1 RSF-4 TOWN STANDARD STANDARD Minimum La Arta per riT Grow Density Mntmum Bross Density Density Maumu a 1 Mtnm>iirr La Width !feet pit dwelhn�} Minimum Street F ^.I stage Front Yard Setback —es measured Pavement wive on a Private [Ua.c 8.250 SF 2 0 Dwelling Units pw Acre 4 0 Dwelling Units per Acre 50 feet 40 feet RSF-4 POD Pianrinq Area - 1 PlarnngAloe 2 5.500 SF 8.600 SF 3 39 DUTAc 50 tee: meas.s at front setback 50 feet on a straight street hontage 30 feet on a cul dart -lira Of curved nonage front Edge of Public Street Right of Way or I Drlt Lusatia Garay_ Ptsk.11 as 1.s Melaiy Structure Accessory Bulldog Sale Yard Setback Prucrpall eulhang Accessory lumens} Career Sias 'lard Setback 20 fat NA 25 feet 20 lest to tau of garage dots 14 lest May not be placed !coward of the Iran lace of the structure feet 5 N NA tea 5 tent 1U lest ad)rrartti b a pubwe street right -OS -way or private drive bleat to an rnensn.ig arioscape tract eQecenl to the right -0l -wall RNr Yard Setback PnriQpill Building 25 teet 15 teat hyena- lots Le test at eau and South property Wunder .trait 'Garage still IL, enhance racing an alley 5 teat .. S feet Accessory lU tea to test Maximum Budding Height Pnnagai Structure re 3b leer - 35 feet .Meillmum - . Budding Arr Or ally Were 4 Maximum Lot Coves - _ - 30 Meat 30 feel - Lw9e 6(»b Pern*ted encroachment, atto builaang setbacks a Arches:t ires laettan including out not kneted to eaves. Day weaken chimneys entertainment centers. Dock ledges centileveerscam-snorts cornices. carklpee& wing was and bee arctatectunal features may ere.; coach Into the required setbacks a maximum a 24 incites O Window welts may encroach into required sMDeOrs a ma+rut .sr, rX JD r dies • Unenotosed ur uncovered patios lees own 30 notes above grade may encroach uAU building setbalis to nisei fore (5) teat a a rot toe d Eriaoachmerns 'nay not intend rip eaeetnfrds without out rteten approve' from the easement hober :)f 11ItheAill rts 1,1.1.1. 418 IIii e Sex L' -w -eel 111 ybQl `. EkTIA I't 1NS( r I : •t i GROL.N l It 'r% bailie .lass. demo l U M.V. !W'i13!1 H IIMNIMMOIMMMIP 5 7- r^.r A., 2 .raarw in �. ≥tsa Sh Ka Ae.* ram .4,43 and DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS )(it:hlaank 6/29/2( SUGGESTED PLAN PALETTE .,:rat r t L. L .L.R(�HLLN 1RLS . • .ANA '-•1t . ti'. "►.r L' yt/ti• . `..k Muc. Gtt/Wx It at at .-Iu%N►d:• .n: Ant.._ *?r •:..4:: r.RuCti 'f rR..:EI&M• . ...tit. .'Id tS.tl eti.! S UC:CyIENTK.S ULARCUS ROWS( 'ILA CORLI IA GRtEASPIRE AJ. k P. -A 1 ANUd3ES NOtc.vL cad SMdE 7 at TRIACMT..W SPICA Is1 SKYLINE W.', CALLERYANA JUERt. aS t:i+I►aON SPIRE 00.1EL4kt.'ERIA PANICJI J11 A Nt.S /LIBRA *._Ni LE LULU .'AM3EFMtij S PYRAMID bat.LJA DAW°, EL.EN 5 at*. IiiisK.StrASSIDIENETSE rSA NE.ANEKARPA k0UTOIS BEAUTY W *AS AROMA ICA GAP} LOW LERCAL:ARPUS a1TRICaT.t Cr I.j aS iAS:GANS SPA1ra * OtL S ♦Ai14AAt.T•ER ALAdtlul. PRLI NjS a '- (MTRn LANOSI.Aat • STREE' Wu: • SPECIALsi LANDSCAPE iRLATLENT • Ani* AG& a MCOIIAJGNTAT.(.Jti ma CONKC - -- - ea -- - -- - -- r -- -I-- -- ---- - I • ; } i II - 1 I • . t I I 4t3. Sr 4- 016 • CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN The Conceptual LartdSCape Plan Identifies key areas designed for parks and open space improvements wgtln the ovens context of the P. {, O. General desaipuons are included to provroe the character of each space. Each area has a brief list of potential uses and character that is not intended to be an aft nclane ILst of potenuar uses A/atonal uses may be added or removes in any of these areas during detailed des+gn process • I tit riltirmAn LT A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10 TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH P M . TOWN OF MEAD. COUNTY OF WELD STATE OF COLORADO 64 866 ACRES TOTAtr 220 SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING UNITS \ t \a a a -- �r , 1 a ale a I i • a. 1000 Pall • TRAILS • LANDSCAPE ACCENT NODES • PLAYGROUND • OPEN RAr 'FELLA • SITE FURNITURE • S11MLal S($bJCIola • INTERPRETIVE SiGNAGE • ACTIvf RECAEATKt/ MREAS • DOG OAIbI • FENC'IiL, a • • TRAIL CORfeoe • LAt[1Jt.Art AG•414'1 WAS:, • SITE FURNITURE • WEN SPACE fI OPEN SPACE i LACANE BUFFER at I NS42 asee4 •••••••44TRAIL CONVECTION �t • I • I MIRY LAMOS Af • STiruuT TREES • SFtUAL i v LANDytAb& I kkA IME:N I • Si IMGE L MONUMEN TAT ILA a • • I II II ma a O / CI: MA allilaKION !!y HA r R C wo LJl61/GV T PARR • PLAYGROUND • TRAILS • OPEN PLAY FEW ` • SITE c%RmairaG • COMIAUNITY GATHERING SPACES MET PARS • TRML. • CPU* PLAY FIELDS • VIE F tfls SA•Ia • DOG AREA T PAM • PLArtaROUND • IRKS • OPEN PLAT FIELD • SITE FUWdS.MK; eft k • SPECIALTv GARDEN f/ � • SPECIAL TY LJNIDSCAPE TREATMENT TICWI• TNALS • silt r adsssnc Sf •. o OD • ti- Page5o t1:�FtLMkftiI.I.IA Ci bast 51ram liaps•u.tU WSI i - a•'• -- ,+3;. piugol.aMr..•. .�t 'Alt I IA CONSUL. I IM1It, (AMP. LOA .cwuna _1•.r:w um...Luw?u_ u Ei al sinlalIPSIP StN1K am Spa 5 a i •tw.a. M, -. .ttA M. IyI 0►j3,Ana CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN 5 01 7 )ut:blank 6/29/2( 'Clad Utal'• Aggil PIM IIDIOU .y Ni710 Crust. atat. at V6 SW - !t :OM I • SAAt> 1 alaNti ti w c Im It lam!YtN �Row .r &m Np'Pi 'IWO COaITY •OAO r as 1ma i 1 III 1 1lkili l..l11Ntit) A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10. TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH P M TOWN OF MEAD COUNTY OF WELD STATE OF COLORADO 64.866 ACRES TOTAL 220 SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING UNITS PAKh S1a cash now is lark.•711"? IMWT n A -,. -- - COUNTY ROAD _ 1 1401 COUNTY a!t)AD la LSI I R n — 011.114 ►tilt CANT"( utak a ma. I. MIN ca.Ma MC V6 Se o�r _ ., - H I ' — {� I // r -; COYOTE RUN SUBBhNSI.YV FINAL PLAT REC. NO. 2951802 I II --+I - I II i ) I IA 11 II F EA 'HER I MOW £STATES I i I FINAL O! A T I , , R£C NO. 2469040 —i- 1 i f, LEGEND 1'I d Sim: raw): 41104+1111118 Figt C SWIM! SEALS i tT NrA'FA 17N5TcJW0K* it Page 6 a l/L • LLVN 'IL.•I. LL. a.'a A east sett lrNpas t lite! . teak .. ..-....tls.aZd1,.ss F.NLRTIA CONSULTING GROUP, LL[ Iizsy meta Wcc*,Sow :of Data.I N) ell: THE USSSP am SIMS ta See SWISS cip Z Q 5 Q ciad IL a. _Si%Y. A) SR an Sr la* GMa ,Y+t14lN AiI.i4114a b 01 7 )ut:hlank 6/29/2( ( L1Lt1041/J Page 7 o R77.`,777 7710.4 77770 CdAire .1777 1- A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH. RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M. TOWN OF MEAD. COUNTY OF WELD STATE OF COLORADO 84.866 ACRES TOTAL 220 SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING UNITS _ COU! le gig Omni A I oar ' malltillififAl =Low i 1 1 4174411111116 A INT, Pt f- -rtiorstiA, AurrartirA / 1 I 11 COYOTE RUN SUB& VISION FINAL PLAT REC. NO.. 2951802 I FEATHER RIDGE ESTA FES I FINAL P/Ar REG. No. 2469040 1 TOLE/TIA CONSULTING GROUP. LLT W Igramorna ammo= GRADING PLAN 7 of 7 )ut:blank 6/29/2( GUNINtj AMFNVMEN I THE HIGHLANDS Page 1 0 FRI ISPER I. IR.VII(WMENI. Cu SIGNATURE BLOCKS Ines HI..Wrst ronNem6s.BB8 acres more mien togenb n end eugem and rtollumM1 FsHng Bme@uef mm�rq map Ann Iuuna Weo,WMHCFunyy,,C .vm n aepcleo nom= public rpFFFH II M: BO?d W TM of Pm loves of Mud dew,. of LFNu .1u ..ywx� �afe�.ware A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., TOWN OF MEAD, COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO 64.866 ACRES TOTAL 220 SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING UNITS YOINI I VICINITY MAP 11O1 TOuuF COUNTY ROW 38 I I II II Iii N�w a00LNtt FAIC0M�J,_ R0AD� ll '0'4 rmu W1 LS FY IOW M 0WMIFF O]WEF MON IA Oh Pam RSF-4 RESIDENTIAL SI)tl aLY 'F*MII F TRUDPLANNED UNIT OEVEWPM6NT,OVE 1,AY DIST! 64'$66A1,iE$ I_ 1 ) tkJ! 300 4SIY W 1 of 1 )ut:blank 6/29/2( Traffic Impact Analysis The Highlands Mead, CO Prepared for: Enertia Consulting Group, LLC. Kimley-darn and Associates. Inc. 2018 Kimley >> Horn nut:blank 6/29/2( Page 2 of The Highlands Mead, Colorado Prepared for: Enertia Consulting Group, LLC. 1529 Market Street, Suite 200 Denver, CO 80202 Prepared by: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Curtis D. Rowe, P.E., PTOE 4852 South Ulster Street, Suite 1500 Denver, CO 80237 (303) 228-2300 May 2018 096214032 This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 3 of Kimley>>>Horn The Highlands - Mead, CO Executive Summary Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. has performed a Traffic Impact Analysis for The Highlands, a proposed single-family residential development generally located south of Weld County Road 36 between Weld County Road 7 and 1-25 in Mead, Colorado. The site is currently vacant and surrounding land uses are generally residential. As currently envisioned, the development would consist of approximately 220 single-family homes with access onto both CR-7 and CR-36. Cross - access is also proposed with the adjacent Coyote Run subdivision via Hughes Drive. Build -out of the project is anticipated in 2023. This report presents trip generation, distribution, traffic analyses, and recommendations for transportation improvements required to meet anticipated traffic demands in conjunction with the development. The traffic conditions studied include the existing (2018) traffic condition, the projected (2023) short-term background and build -out traffic conditions, and the projected (2040) long-term background and build -out traffic conditions. As shown in Table ES -1, the proposed development has the potential to generate 2,148 new trips during a typical weekday, with a total of 161 new trips in the AM peak hour (40 entering and 121 exiting) and 217 new PM peak hour trips (137 entering, 80 exiting). Table ES -1 ITE Traffic Generation (Vehicles) Land Use Code Land Use Intensity Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour In Out In Out In Out 210 Single -Family Detached Housing 220 d.u. 1,074 1,074 40 121 137 80 Capacity analyses were performed using Synchro/SimTraffic Version 9.2 software. Table ES -2 summarizes the operation of the study intersections for the AM and PM peak hour traffic conditions. Table ES -2 Level -of -Service Summary Condition AM Peak Hour LOS (Delay) PM Peak Hour LOS (Delay) CR-34 at I-25 NB Ramps (Unsignalized) Existing (2018) Traffic NB — A (9.7) EBL — A (2.7) NB —A A (5.1) EBL — A (1.9) Background (2023) Traffic NB — B(13.4) EBL—A(3.l) NB — A (5.5) EBL—A(2.1) Build -out (2023) TrafficNB — D (28.7) EBL — A (3.5) NB — A(7.9) EBL — A (2.6) Background (2040) Traffic NB —C (24.2) EBL — A (5.7) NB — A (8,8) EBL. — A (4.6) Build -out (2040) Traffic NB —E(49.2) EBL —A(6.6) NB —C(15.3) EBL — A (5.3) Delays reported! from SimTrafiic.for tntsignali_ed intersections. nit:blank 6/29/2( Page 4 of Kimley>>)Horn The Highlands - Mead, CO Table ES -2 (cont.) Level -of -Service Summary Condition AM Peak Hour LOS (Delay) PM Peak Hour LOS (Delay) CR-34 at 1-25 SB Ramps Existing (2018) Traffic — Unsignalized SB-B(13.1) (13.1) WBL — A (3.4) SB — A(4.3) WBL — A (2.3) Background (2023) Traffic — Unsignalized SB - C (23.5) WBL - A (4.8) SB - A (4.6) WBL — A (2.0) Build -out (2023) Traffic — Unsignalized SB — F (61.8) WBL — A (6.5) SB — A (5.8) WBL — A (2.8) Background (2040) Traffic — Unsignalized SB - F (430.0) WBL - B (11.3) SB - A (7.1) WBL - A (3.8) Background (2040) Traffic —Signalized C (21.4) A (7.0) Build -out (2040) Traffic - Unsignalized SB - F (778.2) WBL — C (21.9) SB - B(10.7) WBL — A (5.2) Build -out (2040) Traffic — Signalized C (30.6) A (7.4) Welker Avenue (CR-34) at 3n° Street (CR-7) (All -Way Stop) Existing (2018) Traffic EB — A (6.7) WB — A (6.2) NB - A (6.9) SB - A (6.0) EB — A (7.2) WB —A (5.1) NB -A(7.8) SB - A (5.9) Background (2023) Traffic EB-A(7.6) WB — A (7.8) NB - A (8.2) SB-A(7.0) EB-B(10.9) WB — A (5.7) NB - A (9.5) SB-A(7.6) Build -out (2023) Traffic EB-B(10.6) WB — B (10.8) NB - A (8.9) SB - B (14.9) EB—B(11.4) WB — A (6.5) NB - B (10.4) SB - B (10.2) Background (2040) Traffic EB—B(13.4) WB — B (10.4) NB - B (10.8) SB-B (13.8) EB—B(13.6) WB — A (7.4) NB - C (16.0) SB—B (11.5) Build -out (2040) Traffic EB—C(15.6) WB — B (12.5) NB — B (11.9) SB - E (46.7) EB—C(15.2) WB — A (9.5) NB — C (23.5) SB - C(18.4) Delays reported from SimTrafc for unsignalized intersections. >ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 5 of Kimley>>)Horn The Highlands - Mead, CO Table ES -2 (cont.) Level -of -Service Summary Condition AM Peak Hour LOS (Delay) PM Peak Hour LOS (Delay) CR-7 at CR-36 (Unsignalized) Existing (2018) Traffic EB-A(5.7) WB —A (4.8) NBL—A (1.1) SBL — A (0.9) EB-A(5.6) WB — A (4.3) NBL — A (1.4) SBL — A (1.2) Background (2023) Traffic EB — A (5.2) WB — A (4.7) NBL — A (2.0) SBL — A (0.9) EB — A (6.0) WB — A (4.4) NBL — A (2.7) SBL — A (0.8) Build -out (2023) Traffic EB—A(4.l) WB — A (5.2) NBL — A (0.2) SBL—A(0.6) EB—A(7.1) WB — A (4.6) NBL — A (1.4) SBL-A(l.6) Background (2040) Traffic EB - A (5.0) WB - A (5.6) NBL - A (2.0) SBL-A(1.1) EB - A (7.2) A (5.1) WB-A(5.1) NBL - A (1.4) SBL—A(19) Build -out (2040) Traffic EB —A (4.7) WB — A (6.5) NBL — A (3.0) SBL - A (0.9) EB — A (7.3) WB — A (6.7) NBL — A (1.9) SBL - A (2.8) CR-7 at Site Driveway (Unsignalized) Build -out (2023) Traffic WB -A (5.7) WB - A (6.3) Build -out (2040) Traffic WB - A (6.6) WB -A (8.7) CR 7 at Site Driveway (Unsignalized) Build -out (2023) Traffic NB - A (4.4) NB - A (4.7) Build -out (2040) Traffic NB - A (4.6) NB - A (5.1) t Delays reported from SimTraffic for unsignalied intersections. 2023 Horizon Year Analyses indicate that all the study intersections except one are expected to operate with short to moderate delays and queues in the 2023 Horizon Year traffic conditions. The intersection of CR- 34 at the I-25 Southbound Ramps is expected to operate with moderate to long delays and queues in the AM peak hour in the 2023 Horizon Year. However, as site traffic associated with the proposed project accounts for less than 10% of the total build -out volumes on the southbound approach at that intersection, and since SimTrat7ic indicates that average queues on the southbound approach are less than 105 feet at project build -out, no roadway improvements are recommended to he performed to accommodate site traffic. nut:blank 6/29/2( Page 6 of Kimley>>)Horn The Highlands — Mead, CO 2040 Horizon Year Analyses indicate that all the study intersections except one are expected to operate with short to moderate delays and queues in the 2040 Horizon Year traffic conditions. The intersection of CR- 34 at the 1-25 Southbound Ramps is expected to operate with very long delays and queues in the AM peak hour in the 2040 Horizon Year if the intersection remains unsignalized and no roadway improvements are constructed. It is anticipated that a signal will be warranted and required at the intersection of CR-34 at the I- 25 Southbound Ramps by the 2040 Horizon Year. While not recommended to be performed as part of this development, the following improvements were identified to mitigate delays in the 2040 Horizon Year: CR-34 at 1-25 SB Ramps: • Construct an exclusive southbound right -turn lane on the I-25 Southbound Off -Ramp • Install a traffic signal With the turn lane and traffic signal in place, analyses indicate that the intersection is expected to operate at an acceptable LOS in the background and build -out traffic conditions in the 2040 Horizon Year. The 2040 Horizon Year laneage is shown on Figure ES -1. )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 7 of • • X110' CR-36 • V • • 1r 150' • CR-34 -- • • 1 LEGEND 4— EXISTING LANE ® EXI' T^,,_ TRAFEI'_, • EXIS,T[rA,; ';,�d X.� STC! ENG�T„{ = FUTURE A i / NOT TO SCALE \ • 4 nut:blank 6/29/2( Page 8 of Kimley>>)Horn TABLE OF CONTENTS The Highlands - Mead, CO Page No. 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 INVENTORY 2 2.1 STUDY AREA2 2.2 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2 3.0 TRAFFIC GENERATION 6 4.0 SITE TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION 7 5.0 PROJECTED TRAFFIC VOLUMES 9 5.1 EXISTING TRAFFIC 9 5.2 HISTORIC GROWTH TRAFFIC 9 5.3 2023 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC 9 5.4 SITE TRAFFIC 9 5.5 2023 BUILD -OUT TRAFFIC 9 5.6 2040 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC 10 5.7 SITE TRAFFIC /0 5.8 2040BUILD-OUT TRAFFIC 10 6.0 CAPACITY ANALYSIS 19 6.1 CR-34 .4T I-25 NORTHBOUND RAMPS 23 6.2 CR-34 AT I-25 SOUTHBOUND RAMPS 24 6.3 WELKER A rEM'E (CR-34) AT 3R" STREET (CR-7) 26 6.4 CR- 7 AT CR-36 28 6.5 CR-7. AT SITE DRIVEWAY 29 6.6 CR-36 AT SITE DRIVE WAY 30 7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 31 Appendices A. TRIP GENERATION B. TRAFFIC COUNT DATA C. INTERSECTION SPREADSHEETS - 2023 D. INTERSECTION SPREADSHEETS - 2040 E. SYNCHRO & SIMTRAFFIC OUTPUT: EXISTING (2018) F. SYNCHRO & SIMTRAFFIC OUTPUT: BACKGROUND (2023) G. SYNCHRO & SIMTRAFFIC OUTPUT: BUILD -OUT (2023) H. SYNCHRO & SIMTRAFFIC OUTPUT: BACKGROUND (2040) I. SYNCHRO & SIMTRAFFIC OUTPUT.' BUILD -OUT (2040) )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 9of: Kimley>>)Horn The Highlands — Mead, CO LIST OF TABLES Table No. Title Page No. Table 10 ITE Traffic Generation (Vehicles) 6 Table 6.0-A Level -of -Service Control Delay Thresholds 19 Table 6.0-B Level -of -Service Summary 20 Table 6.1 Level -of -Service: CR-34 at I-25 NB Ramps 23 Table 6.2 Level -of -Service: CR-34 at I-25 SB Ramps 25 Table 6.3 Level -of -Service: Welker Avenue (CR-34) at 3`d Street (CR-7) 27 Table 6.4 Level -of -Service: CR-7 at CR-36 28 Table 6.5 Level -of -Service: CR-7 at Site Driveway 29 Table 6.6 Level -of -Service: CR-36 at Site Driveway 30 LIST OF FIGURES Figure No. Title Page No. Figure 1 Site Location 3 Figure 2 Preliminary Site Plan 4 Figure 3 Existing Roadway Laneage 5 Figure 4 Site Traffic Distribution and Percent Assignment 8 Figure 5 Existing and Projected (2023) Background AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 11 Figure 6 Existing and Projected (2023) Background PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 12 Figure 7 Projected (2023) Build -out AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 13 Figure 8 Projected (2023) Build -out PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 14 Figure 9 Existing and Projected (2040) Background AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 15 Figure 10 Existing and Projected (2040) Background PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 16 Figure 11 Projected (2040) Build -out AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 17 Figure 12 Projected (2040) Build -out PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 18 Figure 13 2040 Horizon Year Laneage 32 ii nut:blank 6/29/2( Page 10 of Kimley>>>Horn 1.0 Introduction The Highlands — Mead, CO Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. has performed a Traffic Impact Analysis for The Highlands, a proposed single-family residential development generally located south of Weld County Road 36 between Weld County Road 7 and 1-25 in Mead, Colorado. The site is currently vacant and surrounding land uses are generally residential. As currently envisioned, the development would consist of approximately 220 single-family homes with access onto both CR-7 and CR-36. Cross - access is also proposed with the adjacent Coyote Run subdivision via Hughes Drive. Build -out of the project is anticipated in 2023. This report presents trip generation, distribution, traffic analyses, and recommendations for transportation improvements required to meet anticipated traffic demands in conjunction with the development. The traffic conditions studied include the existing (2018) traffic condition, the projected (2023) short-term background and build -out traffic conditions, and the projected (2040) long-term background and build -out traffic conditions. )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 11 of Kimley ))Horn The Highlands - Mead, CO 2.0 Inventory 2.1 Study Area The study area for this development in includes the following intersections: • CR-34 at 1-25 NB Ramps • CR-34 at 1-25 SB Ramps • Welker Avenue (CR-34) at 3`d Street (CR-7) ■ C R-7 at CR-36 ■ CR-7 at Site Driveway • CR-36 at Site Driveway Figure 1 shows the site location. The preliminary site plan is shown on Figure 2. 2.2 Existing Conditions The Highlands development is proposed to be located generally south of CR-36 between CR-7 and I-25 in Mead, Colorado. Roadways in the study area include 1-25, CR-34, CR-7, and CR-36. The existing roadway laneage is shown in Figure 3. Interstate 25 is a four -lane divided north -south interstate with a posted speed limit of 75 mph in the vicinity of the site. Per Colorado Department of Transportation (C DOT) data, the reported 2016 average daily traffic (ADT) volume was approximately 83,000 vehicles per day (vpd) north of CR-34. CR-34 (Welker Avenue) is generally a two-lane undivided east -west roadway with a posted speed limit of 25 mph in the vicinity of CR-7. The estimated 2018 ADT volume is approximately 4,000 vpd. CR-7 (3"' Street) is generally a two-lane undivided north -south roadway with a posted speed limit of 35 mph in the vicinity of CR-34. The estimated 2018 ADT volume is approximately 3,400 vpd north of CR-34. CR-36 is generally a two-lane undivided east -west roadway with a posted speed limit of 35 mph in the vicinity of the site. The estimated 2018 ADT volume is approximately 1,200 vpd east of C R-7. )ut:blank 6/29/2( i s e"-IttrijarljuLeTTLL,1-7.711 W V_TIF-11 iV1 _ t _151 ;2GI r. 1 r: it t +1:1:: - f -� PARK t 23 ACRE r---1 1 I • a - - - �-- -� Intrifti_disur;1<c,?, _fie_ _ ; = --J. • nc r-Tc—latartatierr 1 �3 � -X1..1.1 �` LL�'� PARK t-" _ ..,.,..ars c '��.��cis 412 ACRE riEIRT-4 r•••••••±1 '.:4-1:it4.\*L•-•-t --fill- i 4 x -. r ' - I..q re. -4.1 P-Trit ltd, ffis '4"Thftnt-", r.. "Y 1.1 I- 4—t • 43 AC !� H+H R -{ EITV:-. • .1,1_4 4...e- il, ,4. ____L Li 14 4_0 sisitiLiiti i t- Pei --1 fl T -t--r -ri fT rt rr 1t 71-1-1 rtt- 1 1 V L__�.J_L1J_ILJ_1_11.1}J_LL1_LL _1_1_LJ_L.1.s_L.1.1_►-1-1_t_1_ Mea d Mead. Colorado Conceptual Site Plan tsar :4.. 14 • .1040••• IsApeabill O. •r L4 -� DETENTION I 1 I I' O PROSPER H • onset •11144 ,. Page 13 of: I 6 I W L (-•4 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN E >44 a E )Ut:blank 6/2912( Page 14 of LEGEND • XX' 4, aiw• La • 4- is 100' 1 r t- 150' • r • 'h EXISTING LANE EXISTING STOP SIGN STORAGE LENGTH C R-3 CR-34 (WELKER AVE.) Iv? • tt4 oit) r" I 1 NOT TO SCALE eta • 'f' Kimley \>>Horn THE RI C H LA N— 1i� IvIF A D . .� FRAFFIs r -1 NIC ROADWAY LANEA CE FIGURE 13 I -s 7.rEs.' .1.. F t.: :_ __ ,.,_ ::LIEN' *HK: P. 7 kA'- PP PA Ej 4'2; (IS:. 1F A'.. kw Ft 'I `.. .. 'I. . • . I.lL • ;44 All 4`':.v' )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 15 of Kimley>>>Horn 3.0 Traffic Generation The Highlands — Mead, CO The traffic generation potential of the proposed development was determined using the traffic generation rates published in Trip Generation (institute of Transportation Engineers, Tenth Edition, 2017). As currently envisioned the development will consist of approximately 220 single-family homes. Table 3.0 summarizes the estimated traffic generation for the proposed development. Table 3.0 ITE Traffic Generation (Vehicles) Land Use Code Land Use Intensity Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour In Out In Out In Out 210 Single -Family Detached Housing 220 d.u. 1,074 1,074 40 121 137 80 Table 3.0 shows that the proposed development has the potential to generate 2,148 new trips during a typical weekday, with a total of 161 new trips in the AM peak hour (40 entering and 121 exiting) and 217 new PM peak hour trips (137 entering, 80 exiting). Detailed trip generation calculations are included in the Appendix of this report. )ut: blank 6/29/2( Page 16 of: Kimley>>>Horn 4.0 Site Traffic Distribution The Highlands — Mead, CO The projected site -generated trips were assigned to the surrounding roadway network. The directional distribution and assignment for this development were based on a review of surrounding land uses and existing traffic patterns: • 50% to/from the south on 1-25 • 35% to/from the north on 1-25 • 5% to/from the east on CR-34 • 5% to/from the west on CR-34 (Welker Avenue) • 5% to/from the south on CR-7 (3"' Street) The site traffic distribution and percent assignment for site are shown on Figure 4. rut:blank 6/29/2( Page 17 of NOT TO SCALE CR-36 1� 90% SITE DRIVE 25% J SITE CR-34 5 55% 4- 5% LEGEND NE: �L;rty PFRC ENT A.S31Ci\lhAF^,,_ F17.7,...171,..i7 AN1',117 A ;<' 5% (WELKER AVE.) (40%) —► (50%) -?^_L _ ..'!E. Kimley )Horn )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 18 of Kimley>»Horn 5.0 Projected Traffic Volumes 5.1 Existing Traffic AM peak hour (7:00 to 9:00 AM) and PM peak hour (4:00 to 6:00 PM) turning movement counts were performed at the following intersections: • CR-34 at I-25 NB Ramps • CR-34 at I-25 SB Ramps • Welker Avenue (CR-34) at 3"' Street (CR-7) • CR-7 at CR-36 The Highlands — Mead, CO April 3, 2018 April 3, 2018 April 3, 2018 April 3, 2018 The existing AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes are shown on Figures 5 and 6, and the traffic count data are included in the Appendix. 5.2 Historic Growth Traffic Historic growth traffic is the increase in traffic due to usage increases and non-specific growth throughout the area. For this analysis, an annual growth rate of 3% was applied to the existing volumes up to the horizon years 2023 and 2040. Background growth calculations are detailed on intersection spreadsheets in the Appendix of this report. 5.3 2023 Background Traffic Background traffic volumes consisting of existing and historic growth traffic are shown on Figures 5 and 6 for the AM and PM peak hours, respectively for the 2023 horizon year. 5.4 Site Traffic The projected site traffic was generated and assigned to the adjacent roadway network according to the distribution discussed previously in Section 4.0. The site traffic volumes for the AM and PM peak hours are shown in Figures 7 and 8, respectively. 5.5 2023 Build -Out Traffic To obtain the projected (2023) build -out traffic volumes, the projected site traffic volumes were added to the projected (2023) background traffic. Traffic volume calculations are detailed in intersection spreadsheets in the Appendix of this report. Figures 7 and 8 show the projected (2023) AM and PM peak hour build -out traffic volumes, respectively. )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 19 of Kimley>>>Horn 5.6 2040 Background Traffic Background traffic volumes consisting of existing and historic growth traffic are shown on Figures 9 and 10 for the AM and PM peak hours, respectively for the 2040 horizon year. 5.7 Site Traffic The Highlands — Mead, CO No changes to the site traffic distribution or assignment were made between the short-term and long-term horizon year analyses. The projected site traffic was generated and assigned to the adjacent roadway network according to the distribution discussed previously in Section 4.0. The site traffic volumes for the AM and PM peak hours are shown in Figures 11 and 12, respectively. 5.8 2040 Build -Out Traffic To obtain the projected (2040) build -out traffic volumes, the projected site traffic volumes were added to the projected (2040) background traffic. Traffic volume calculations are detailed in intersection spreadsheets in the Appendix of this report. Figures 11 and 12 show the projected (2040) AM and PM peak hour build -out traffic volumes, respectively. I )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 20 of S -O 1-- r•-• J1�. 8(I)[9] 4— 8(I)[9] 76(12)[88] CR-36 [I] (0) 1 -� [I] (0)1 — [2] (0) 2 -� ) t- 39 (6) [45] 4-- 152 (24) [176] r 18 (3) [21] CR-34 v1 a J 1 �. 178 (28) [206] 179 (29)(208] i NOT TO SCALE 36 (6) [42] Al— 255 (41) [296] [20] (3) 17 11541(21) 133 —► [52] (7)45 '1 1 r M1 h fJ h T 30 . X E f N::, T ,. d: f [991 (14) 85 - [1631(22) 141 [37](5)32 [158] (22) 136 - )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 21 of: 11 (2) [13] 4- 1(0) 111 • 42 (7) [49] CR-36 i [3] (0) 3 [81(1)7 �► [1](0)1 -b - ^c_— . 0' C *)1r F W r` ti] vVI rn )1� • 88(14)[102] 4 — 83 (13) [96] 10(2)[12] CR-34 4)1L ri 1 -4— 143423)[166] NOT TO SCALE I 105(17)1122] 36 (6) [421 f-127(20)[147] [41](6)35 —fr [1221(17) 105 —4- [641 (9155 —� *itr t-UFF:'.. '< P C P i U [1311(18)113 —► [881 (12) 76 - [23](3)20 [1121(15)97 —� k4 j )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 22 of t- 9 (0) [9] 4— 9 (0) [9] r 88 (30) [I I8] CR-36 4— 107 (0) [ 107] j- 0 0.0[0] [II(0)1 -"9 (I](0)1 [22] (0) 2 -� 4)1r OC M 1[171(0)17 [10](10)0 SITE DRIVE 45 (36) [81] 4— 176 (0) [176] 4-- 21 (0) [21] CR-34 '1r1 C0. - M SITE �1L [2221(2)2Q [I54](0) 154 —► [521(0) 52 -, 4)1r FL. [1471(48)99 —B. [224] (61) 163 —� i1 �— 206 (22) [228] 208 (0) [208] [79] (42) 37 —9 [164] (6) 158 - i NOT TO SCALE L 42 (0)[42] 296 (2) [298] 4)1r Q � r oc o o o a oc oc )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 23 of c c = C _�� L- 13 (0) [13] 4—I(0)Il] 49 (20) [69] CR-36 4- 63 (0) [63] r- 0 (0) [0] [3] (0) 3' [8] (0) 8 —► [1](0)1-. r wo �1L 4)tr Cl NWI x Cl I 0 (0) [01 0 (60) [60] [100] (0) 100 [34] (34) 0 J SITE DRIVE L 1021123) [225] a- 96 (0) [96] j- I2 (0) [ 12] CR-34 114. SITE J1 [V 4- 166 (75) [241 ] r 42 (0) [42] i NOT TO SCALE L 122 (0) [122] 4- 147 (7) [154] [48] (7) 41 [ 122] (0) 122 —► [64] (0)64 - xx HACKS; R a i^a(> TR-1J x: Lxx: [163](32)131 [128] (40) 88 [51 ] (28) 23 [116](4)112 —0. )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 24 of 8(7)[15] r— 8 (7) [15] 4.— 76 (70) [1461 CR-36 [2] (1) 1 [2](1)I-- [4] (2) 2 Z r-- .)! Lil L4 E-' 39 (36) [75] i— 152 (139) [291 j-- 18 (16) [34] CR-34 [33] ( 16) 17 —9 [255] (122) 133 —r [86] (41) 45 —� x;x Kimsey >>Horn [163] (78) 85 —► [270] (129) 141 t— 178 (163) [341] r 179 (164) [343] [61 ] (29) 32 [261] (125) 136 —, �Q. i NOT TO SCALE L 36 (33) [69] f— 255 (234) [489] 4)1' r )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 25 of L 11(10) [21] 4- I (l)(21 r 42 (38) [80] CR-36 i [6] (3) 3 [13](6)7 —► [2] (1) 1 —� rc V 4 1 r N 88(81)[169] 4— 83 (76) [ 159] c— 10 (9) [19] CR-34 4- 143 (131) [274] NOT TO SCALE t— 105 (96) [201] 36 (33) [69] 4— 127 (116) [243] [67] (32) 35 1 [201] (96) 105 [105] (50) 55 4)tr X RAC'<C,RCIJND GRowTH Kimley *Horn [2171(104) 113 —► [146] (70) 76 [38] (18) 20 [186] (89) 97 — (Q nut:blank 6/29/2( Page 26 of **-- 15 (0) [ 15] 4— 15(0)[15] r 146 (30) [176] CR-36 4— 176 (0) [176] 0 (0) [0] [2](0)2 —1 [2](0)2 —► [4] (0) 4 —1, r v j �. [[291(0)29 [10](10)0 (0) [0] r- 0(91)[91] SITE ] DRIVE 75 (36) [III] 4- 291 (0) [291] 4.- 34 (0) [34] CR-34 o 00 SITE r - x 4J j L 4- 341 (22) [363] [35] (2) 33 -p [255] (0) 255 —I). [86] (0) 86 I I r 00 'C- v� 'C rj,r I -F TR4F= [211] (48) 163 -b- [3311(61)270 -� i NOT TO SCALE L 69 (0) [69] r 343 (0) [343] 4- 489 (2) [491] [103] (42) 61 -1 h1 1 1 [267] (6) 261 0�Tr $ o ono � u'C )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 27 of 21 (0) [21] 4— 2(0) [21 �- 80 (20) [ 100] CR-36 t— 103 (0) [103] 010) [0] [6] (0) 6 -� [131(0)13 —b. [2] (0) 2 -4, r` )1L 4)tr I 0 (0) [0] I r o (60) [60] SITE J [165] (0) 165 [34] (34) 0 ii 1 DRIVE L 169 (123) [292] 4— 159 (0) [159] 19 (0) [ 19] CR-34 ii SITE 411. i NOT TO SCALE '4- 274 (75) [349] L 201 (0) [201 r 69 (0) [69] [66] (28) 38 -9 [190] (4) 186 -► [74] (7) 67 -9 [201 ] (0) 201 —. [105] (0) 105 -.4 X` S! --F TFAF' 4)1r rp,,`,,=FIB., [249] (32) 217 —i [186] (40) 146 -.4, tp A 4- 243 (7) [250 Kimley >>Horn )ut:blank 612912( Page 28 of Kimley>>>Horn 6.0 Capacity Analysis The Highlands — Mead. CO Capacity analyses (see Appendix) were performed for the AM and PM peak hours for the existing traffic condition, the projected (2023) background and build -out traffic conditions, and the projected (2040) background and build -out traffic conditions using Synchro/SimTraffic Version 9.2 software to determine the operating characteristics of the adjacent road network and the impacts of the proposed project. Capacity is defined as the maximum number of vehicles that can pass over a particular road segment or through a particular intersection within a set time duration. Capacity is combined with Level -of -Service (LOS) to describe the operating characteristics of a road segment or intersection. LOS is a qualitative measure that describes operational conditions and motorist perceptions within a traffic stream. The Highway Capacity Manual defines six levels of service, LOS A through LOS F, with A representing the shortest average delays and F representing the longest average delays. LOS D is the typically accepted standard for signalized intersections in urbanized areas. For signalized intersections, LOS is defined for the overall intersection operation. For unsignalized intersections, only the movements that must yield right-of-way experience control delay. Therefore, LOS criteria for the overall intersection is not reported by Synchro/SimTraffic Version 9.2 or computable using methodology published in the Highway Capacity Manual. It is typical for stop sign controlled side streets and driveways intersecting major streets to experience long delays during peak hours, while the majority of the traffic moving through the intersection on the major street experiences little or no delay. Table 6.0-A lists the LOS control delay thresholds published in the Highway Capacity Manual for signalized and unsignalized intersections. Table 6.0-A Level -of -Service Control Delay Thresholds Level -of- Service Signalized Intersections — Control Delay Per Vehicle [sec/veh] Unsignalized Intersections — Average Control Delay [sec/veh] A < l0 < 10 B >10-20 >10-15 C >20-35 >15-25 D > 35 - 55 > 25 - 35 E >55-80 >35-50 F >80 >50 Existing peak hour factors (PHF) were used for the existing and short-term horizon year (2023) background and build -out traffic conditions. A consistent PIIF of 0.92 was used for the long-term horizon year (2040) background and build -out traffic conditions. It )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 29 of Kimley>»Horn The Highlands — Mead, CO Capacity analyses were performed for the existing (2018) traffic condition, the projected (2023) short-term background and build -out traffic conditions, and the projected (2040) long-term background and build -out traffic conditions for the following intersections: • CR-34 at I-25 NB Ramps • CR-34 at 1-25 SB Ramps • Welker Avenue (CR-34) at 3`d Street (CR-7) • CR-7 at CR-36 • CR-7 at Site Driveway • CR-36 at Site Driveway Table 6.0-B summarizes the LOS and delay (seconds per vehicle) for all of the study intersections for the existing (2018) traffic condition, the projected (2023) short-term background and build - out traffic conditions, and tie projected (2040) long-term background and build -out traffic conditions. All capacity analyses are included in the Appendix and are briefly summarized in the following sub -sections. Table 6.0-B Level -of -Service Summary Condition AM Peak Hour LOS (Delay) PM Peak Hour LOS (Delay) CR-34 at 1-25 NB Ramps (Unsignalized) Existing (2018) Traffic NB — A (9,7) EBL — A (2.7) A (5.1) NB -A(5.1) EBL —A(1.9) Background (2023) Traffic NB — B (13.4) EBL —A(3.1) NB — A (5.5) EBL — A (2.1) Build -out (2023) Traffic NB — D (28.7) EBL — A (3.5) NB — A (7.9) EBL — A (2.6) Background (2040) Traffic NB — C (24.2) EBL - A (5.7) NB — A (8.8) EBL - A (4.6) Build -out (2040) Traffic NB — E (49,2) EBL — A (6.6) NB — C (15.3) EBL — A (5.3) Delays reported from SimTrajfic for unsignalized intersections. 2U >ut:blank :6/29/2( Page 30 of Kimley>»Horn The Highlands - Mead, CO Table 6.0-B Level -of -Service Summary Condition AM Peak Hour LOS (Delay) PM Peak Hour LOS (Delay) CR-34 at I-25 SB Ramps Existing (2018) Traffic — Unsignalized SB SB-B(13.1) (13. l ) WBL - A (3.4) SB - A (4.3) WBL - A (2.3) Background (2023) Traffic - Unsignalized SB - C (23.5) WBL - A (4.8) SB - A (4.6) WBL - A (2.0) Build -out (2023) Traffic — Unsignalized SB - F (61.8) WBL — A (6.5) SB — A (5.8) WBL — A (2.8) Background (2040) Traffic — Unsignalized SB F (430.0) WBL — B (11.3) SB —A(7.1) WBL — A (3.8) Background (2040) Traffic — Signalized C (21.4) A (7.0) Build -out (2040) Traffic — Unsignalized SB - F (7782) WBL - C (21.9) SB - B (10.7) WBL — A (5.2) Build -out (2040) Traffic — Signalized C (30.6) A (7.4) Welker Avenue (CR-34) at 3"d Street (CR-7) (All -Way Stop) Existing (2018) Traffic EB — A (6.7) WB — A (6.2) NB — A (6.9) SB - A (6.0) EB — A (7.2) WB —A(5.1) NB — A (7.8) SB - A (5.9) Background (2023) Traffic EB-A(7.6) WB — A (7.8) NB - A (8.2) SB - A (7.0) EB-B(10.9) WB — A (5.7) NB - A (9.5) SB - A (7.6) Build -out (2023) Traffic EB-B(10.6) WB — B (10.8) NB — A (8.9) SB-B(14.9) EB—B(11.4) WB — A (6.5) NB - B (10.4) SB-B(10.2) Background (2040) Traffic EB—B(13.4) WB — B (10.4) NB - B (10.8) SB-B(13.8) EB—B(13.6) WB — A (7.4) NB - C (16.0) SB—B(11.5) Build -out (2040) Traffic EB—C(15.6) WB — B(12.5) NB - B (11.9) SB - E (46.7) EB—C(15.2) WB - A (9.5) NB - C (23.5) SB - C(18.4) Delays reported from Sim Traffic for unsignalized intersections. 2! >ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 31 of: Kimley>>>Horn The Highlands - Mead, CO Table 6.0-B (cont.) Level -of -Service Summary Condition AM Peak Hour LOS (Delay) PM Peak Hour LOS (Delay) CR-7 at CR-36 (Unsignalized) Existing (2018) Traffic EB — A (5.7) WB — A (4.8) NBL —A(1.1) SBL-A(0.9) EB — A (5.6) WB — A (4.3) NBL -A(1.4) SBL—A(1.2) Background (2023) Traffic EB — A (5.2) WB — A (4.7) NBL — A (2.0) SBL — A (0.9) EB — A (6.0) WB — A (4.4) NBL — A (2.7) SBL — A (0.8) Build -out (2023) Traffic EB—A(4.1) A (4.l) WB — A (5.2) NBL — A (0.2) SBL — A (0.6) EB—A(7.1) A (7.1) WB — A (4.6) NBL — A (1.4) SBL — A (1.6) Background (2040) Traffic EB — A (5.0) WB — A (5.6) NBL — A (2.0) SBL—A(1.1) EB — A (7.2) WB — A (5.1) NBL — A (1.4) SBL —A(1.9) Build -out (2040) Traffic EB — A (4.7) WB — A (6.5) NBL — A (3.0) SBL — A (0.9) EB — A (7.3) WB — A (6.7) NBL — A (1.9) SBL — A (2.8) CR-7 at Site Driveway (Unsignalized) Build -out (2023) Traffic WB — A (5.7) WB —A (6.3) Build -out (2040) Traffic WB —A (6.6) WB — A (8.7) CR-7 at Site Driveway (Unsignalized) Build -out (2023) Traffic NB — A (4.4) NB — A (4.7) Build -out (2040) Traffic NB — A (4.6) A (5.1) NB -A(5.1) Delays reported from SimTrafc for unsignali:ed intersections. nut:blank 6/29/2( Page 32 of Kimley>>>Horn 6.1 CR-34 at 1-25 Northbound Ramps Analyses indicate that the unsignalized intersection of CR-34 at the I-25 Northbound Ramps currently operates with short delays on the minor street approach (1-25 NB Ramps). The Highlands — Mead, CO 2023 Horizon Year Analyses indicate that the intersection will operate with short to moderate delays in the AM and PM peak hours with or without the proposed project in place in the 2023 Horizon Year. No queueing issues are expected at this intersection, and no roadway improvements are recommended to be performed to accommodate site traffic volumes associated with The Highlands project. 2040 Horizon Year Analyses indicate that the intersection will continue to operate with short to moderate delays in the AM and PM peak hours with or without the proposed project in place in the 2040 Horizon Year. No queueing issues are expected at this intersection, and no roadway improvements are recommended to be performed to accommodate site traffic volumes associated with The Highlands project. Table 6.1 summarizes the operation of the intersection of CR-34 at 1-25 NB Ramps for the existing (2018) traffic condition, the projected (2023) short-term background and build -out traffic conditions, and the projected (2040) long-term background and build -out traffic conditions. Table 6.1 Level -of -Service CR-34 at I-25 NB Ramps (Unsignalized) Condition AM Peak Hour LOS (Delay) PM Peak Hour LOS (Delay) Existing (2018) Traffic NB — A (9.7) EBL — A (2.7) A (5.1) NB —A(5.1) EBL — A (1.9) Background (2023) Traffic NB — B (13.4) EBL - A (3.1) NB — A (5.5) EBL - A (2.1) Build -out (2023) Traffic NB -D(28.7) EBL - A (3.5) NB -A(7.9) EBL - A (2.6) Background (2040) Traffic NB - C (24.2) EBL - A (5.7) NB - A (8.8) EBL - A (4.6) Build -out (2040) Traffic NB - E (49.2) EBL - A (6.6) NB - C(15.3) EBL - A (5.3) Delays reported from SimTiaffc. )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 33 of Kimley>>)Horn 6.2 CR-34 at 1-25 Southbound Ramps Analyses indicate that the unsignalized intersection of CR-34 at the 1-25 Southbound Ramps currently operates with short delays on the minor street approach (1-25 SB Ramps). The Highlands — Mead, CO 2023 Horizon Year Analyses indicate that the intersection will operate with short delays in the AM and PM peak hours in the background traffic condition in the 2023 Horizon Year. In the projected (2023) build - out traffic condition, analyses indicate that the intersection will operate with long delays on the minor -street approach in the AM peak hour and with short delays in the PM peak hour. While some long queues were observed in SimTraffic, average queues on the southbound approach were noted to be approximately 105 feet in the AM peak hour at project build -out with or without the proposed project in place in the 2023 Horizon Year. As site traffic accounts for less than 10% of the total build -out traffic volume on that approach, no roadway improvements are recommended to be performed to accommodate site traffic volumes associated with The Highlands project. 2040 Horizon Year Analyses indicate that the intersection will continue to operate with short delays and queues in the PM peak hour in the 2040 Horizon Year, but very long delays and queues are expected on the minor street approach in the AM peak hour with or without the proposed project in place if the intersection remains unsignalized and no roadway improvements are constructed. It is anticipated that a signal will be warranted and required at the intersection of CR-34 at the I- 25 Southbound Ramps by the 2040 Horizon Year. While not recommended to be performed as part of this development, the following improvements were identified to mitigate delays in the 2040 Horizon Year: • Construct an exclusive southbound right -turn lane on the 1-25 Southbound Off -Ramp • Install a traffic signal With the turn lane and traffic signal in place, analyses indicate that the intersection is expected to operate at an acceptable LOS in the background and build -out traffic conditions in the 2040 Horizon Year. Table 6.2 summarizes the operation of the intersection of CR-34 at 1-25 SB Ramps for the existing (2018) traffic condition, the projected (2023) short-term background and build -out traffic conditions, and the projected (2040) long-term background and build -out traffic conditions. 23 )ut:blank ,6/29/2( Page 34 of: Kimley>>>Horn The Highlands - Mead, CO Table 6.2 Level -of -Service CR-34 at 1-25 SB Ramps (Unsignalized) Condition AM Peak Hour LOS (Delay) PM Peak Hour LOS (Delay) Existing (2018) Traffic — Unsignalized SB -B (13.1) WBL - A (3.4) SB - A (4.3) WBL - A (2.3) Background (2023) Traffic - Unsignalized SB - C (23.5) WBL - A (4.8) SB - A (4.6) WBL — A (2.0) Build -out (2023) Traffic — Unsignalized SB — F (61.8) WBL — A (6.5) SB — A (5.8) WBL — A (2.8) Background (2040) Traffic — Unsignalized SB — F (430.0) WBL — B (11.3) SB — A (7.1) WBL — A (3.8) Background (2040) Traffic — Signalized C (21.4) A (7.0) Build -out (2040) Traffic — Unsignalized SB - F (778.2) WBL — C (21.9) SB — B (10.7) WBL - A (5.2) Build -out (2040) Traffic - Signalized C (30.6) A (7.4) Delays reported from SimTrafc for unsignalized scenarios. rut:blank 6/29/2( Page 35 of Kimsey>>>Horn 6.3 Welker Avenue (CR-34) at 3rd Street (CR-7) Analyses indicate that the unsignalized, all -way stop intersection of Welker Avenue (CR-34) at 3'd Street (CR-7) currently operates with short delays on each of the intersection approaches. The Highlands — Mead, CO 2023 Horizon Year Analyses indicate that the intersection will operate with short delays in the AM and PM peak hours with or without the proposed project in place in the 2023 Horizon Year. No queueing issues are expected at this intersection, and no roadway improvements are recommended to be performed to accommodate site traffic volumes associated with The Highlands project. 2040 Horizon Year Analyses indicate that the intersection will continue to operate with short to moderate delays in both peak hours with or without the proposed project in place in the 2040 Horizon Year. No queueing issues are expected at this intersection, and no roadway improvements are recommended to be performed to accommodate site traffic volumes associated with The Highlands project. Table 6.3 summarizes the operation of the intersection of Welker Avenue (CR-34) at 3rd Street (CR-7) for the existing (2018) traffic condition, the projected (2023) short-term background and build -out traffic conditions, and the projected (2040) long-term background and build -out traffic conditions. 26 nut:blank 6/29/2( Page 36 of: Kimley>>)Horn The Highlands — Mead, CO Table 6.3 Level -of -Service Welker Avenue (CR-34) at 3' Street (CR-7) (All -Way Stop) Condition AM Peak Hour LOS (Delay) PM Peak Hour LOS (Delay) Existing (2018) Traffic EB — A (6.7) WB — A (6.2) NB — A (6.9) SB—A(6.0) EB — A (7.2) WB — A (5.1) NB — A (7.8) SB-A(5.9) Background (2023) Traffic EB-A(7.6) WB — A (7.8) NB - A (8.2) SB-A(7.0) EB-B(10.9) WB — A (5.7) NB - A (9.5) SB-A(7.6) Build -out (2023) Traffic EB-B(10.6) WB — B (10.8) NB — A (8.9) SB—B(14.9) EB—B(11.4) WB — A (6.5) NB — B (10.4) SB—B(10.2) Background (2040) Traffic EB—B(13.4) WB — B (10.4) NB - B (10.8) SB-B(13.8) EB—B (13.6) WB — A (7.4) NB -C (16.0) SB-B(11.5) Build-out(2040)Traffic EB-C(15.6) WB—B(12.5) NB — B (11.9) SB-E(46.7) EB-C(15.2) WB—A(9.5) NB - C (23.5) SB-C(18.4) Delays reported from SimTrafc. rut:blank 6/29/2( Page 37 of Kimley>>)Horn 6.4 CR-7 at CR-36 The Highlands — Mead, CO Analyses indicate that the unsignalized intersection of CR-7 at CR-36 currently operates with short delays on the minor street approaches (CR-36). 2023 Horizon Year Analyses indicate that the intersection will operate with short delays in the AM and PM peak hours with or without the proposed project in place in the 2023 Horizon Year. No queueing issues are expected at this intersection, and no roadway improvements are recommended to be performed to accommodate site traffic volumes associated with The Highlands project. 2040 Horizon Year Analyses indicate that the intersection will continue to operate with short delays in the AM and PM peak hours with or without the proposed project in place in the 2040 Horizon Year. No queueing issues are expected at this intersection, and no roadway improvements are recommended to be performed to accommodate site traffic volumes associated with The Highlands project. Table 6.4 summarizes the operation of the intersection of CR-7 at CR-36 for the existing (2018) traffic condition, the projected (2023) short-term background and build -out traffic conditions, and the projected (2040) long-term background and build -out traffic conditions. Table 6.4 Level -of -Service CR-7 at CR-36 (Unsignalized) Condition AM Peak Hour LOS (Delay) PM Peak Hour LOS (Delay) Existing (2018) Traffic EB—A(5.7) WB — A (4.8) NBL - A (1.1) SBL - A (09) EB—A(5.6) WB - A (4.3) NBL -A(1.4) SBL — A (1.2) Background (2023) Traffic EB—A(5.2) WB — A (4.7) NBL — A (2.0) SBL - A (0.9) EB—A(6.0) WB — A (4.4) NBL — A (2.7) SBL — A (0.8) Build -out (2023) Traffic EB—A(4.1) WB — A (5.2) NBL — A (0.2) SBL — A (0.6) EB—A(7.1) WB — A (4.6) NBL — A (1.4) SBL - A (1.6) Background (2040) Traffic EB - A (5.0) WB-A(5.6) NBL - A (2.0) SBL-A(1.1) EB - A (7.2) WB-A(5.1) NBL - A (1.4) SBL -A(1.9) Build -out (2040) Traffic LB — A (4.7) WB—A(6.5) NBL —A(3.0) SBL — A (0.9) EB — A (7.3) WB—A(6.7) NBL —A(1.9) SBL — A (2.8) rut:blank 6/29/2( Page 38 of Kimley>>)Horn 6.5 CR-7 at Site Driveway The Highlands — Mead, CO A full -movement driveway is proposed on CR-7 approximately 1,200 feet south of CR-36. Analyses indicate that this intersection is expected to operate with short delays and queues on the minor street approach (Site Driveway) in both the 2023 and 2040 Horizon Years. No roadway improvements are recommended to be performed to accommodate site traffic volumes associated with The Highlands project. It should be noted that, for the purposes of this analysis, this site driveway was analyzed with one ingress and one egress lanes. Table 6.5 summarizes the operation of the intersection of CR-7 at Site Driveway for the projected (2023) short-term build -out traffic condition and the projected (2040) long-term build -out traffic condition. Table 6.5 Level -of -Service CR-7 at Site DrivewayyUnsignalized) Condition AM Peak Hour LOS (Delay) PM Peak Hour LOS (Delay) Build -out (2023) Traffic WB - A (5.7) WB - A (6.3) Build -out (2040) Traffic WB - A (6.6) WB - A (8.7) Delays reported from SimTrafc. )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 39 of Kimley>>>Horn 6.6 CR-36 at Site Driveway The Highlands — Mead, CO A full -movement driveway is proposed on CR-36 approximately 2,200 feet east of CR-7. Analyses indicate that this intersection is expected to operate with short delays and queues on the minor street approach (Site Driveway) in both the 2023 and 2040 Horizon Years. No roadway improvements are recommended to be performed to accommodate site traffic volumes associated with The Highlands project. It should be noted that, for the purposes of this analysis, this site driveway was analyzed with one ingress and one egress lanes. Table 6.6 summarizes the operation of the intersection of CR-36 at Site Driveway for the projected (2023) short-term build -out traffic condition and the projected (2040) long-term build - out traffic condition. Table 6.6 Level -of -Service CR-36 at Site Driveway(Unsignalized) Condition AM Peak Hour LOS (Delay) PM Peak Hour LOS (Delay) Build -out (2023) Traffic NB — A (4.4) NB — A (4.7) Build -out (2040) Traffic NB — A (4.6) NB — A (5.1) Delays reported from SimTrafc. 30 )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 40 of Kimley>>>Horn 7.0 Recommendations The Highlands — Mead, CO 2023 Horizon Year Analyses indicate that all the study intersections except one are expected to operate with short to moderate delays and queues in the 2023 Horizon Year traffic conditions. The intersection of CR- 34 at the I-25 Southbound Ramps is expected to operate with moderate to long delays and queues in the AM peak hour in the 2023 Horizon Year. However, as site traffic associated with the proposed project accounts for less than 10% of the total build -out volumes on the southbound approach at that intersection, and since SimTraffic indicates that average queues on the southbound approach are less than 105 feet at project build -out, no roadway improvements are recommended to be performed to accommodate site traffic. 2040 Horizon Year Analyses indicate that all the study intersections except one are expected to operate with short to moderate delays and queues in the 2040 Horizon Year traffic conditions. The intersection of CR- 34 at the 1-25 Southbound Ramps is expected to operate with very long delays and queues in the AM peak hour in the 2040 Horizon Year if the intersection remains unsignalized and no roadway improvements are constructed. It is anticipated that a signal will be warranted and required at the intersection of CR-34 at the I- 25 Southbound Ramps by the 2040 Horizon Year. While not recommended to be performed as part of this development, the following improvements were identified to mitigate delays in the 2040 Horizon Year: CR-34 at 1-25 SB Ramps: • Construct an exclusive southbound right -turn lane on the I-25 Southbound Off -Ramp • Install a traffic signal With the turn lane and traffic signal in place, analyses indicate that the intersection is expected to operate at an acceptable LOS in the background and build -out traffic conditions in the 2040 Horizon Year. The 2040 Horizon Year laneage is shown on Figure 13. )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 41 of EXISTING TRAFFIC SI EXISTING S'():" SIGN N STORAGE -=N'OT`t FUTURE TURN LANE Kimsey >>Horn )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 42 of Appendix >ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 43 of Appendix A: Trip Generation )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 44 of The Highlands Table 1 - Trip Generation Land Use Intensity Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Total I In I Out Total I In I Out Total In I Out 210 Single Family Detached Housing 220 d.u. 2.148 I 1,074 I 1,074 161 l 40 I 121 217 Ii 137 I 80 K:\DUR_LDEV\096214032 The Highlands \T4 - Analysis\iTheHighlands-TIAData-2023BuildidsjTrip Gen 5/10/18 )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 45 of Appendix B: Traffic Count Data rut:blank 6/29/2( Page 46 of RDC Ridgeview Data Collection Morrison, CO 80465 Mead, CO The Highlands AM Peak CR-34 and 1-25 Northbound Ramp File Name Site Code Start Date Page No Groups Printed- Automobiles : CR-34 and 1-25 NB Ramp AM : IPO 326 : 4/3/2018 :1 CR-34 (Welker Ave) Eastbound CR-34 (Welker Ave) Westbound 1-25 Northbound Ramp Northbound 1-25 Northbound Ramp Southbound Start Time Left I Thru I Right I u Tum I app. rad Left I Thru I Right I u Tum I ,pp r,w Left I Thru 1 Right I u run I App rad Lett 1 Thru I Right 1 u Tum I Aro TOM Int. Total 1 07:00 AM 10 20 0 0 30 0 50 8 0 58 8 0 6 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 102 07:15 AM 8 30 0 0 38 0 74 9 0 83 20 1 13 0 34 0 0 0 0 0 155 07:30 AM 8 44 0 0 52 0 79 6 0 85 56 0 36 0 92 0 0 0 0 0 229 07:45 AM 6 42 0 0 48 0 52 13 0 65 18 1 21 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 153 Total 32 136 0 0 168 0 255 36 0 291 102 2 76 0 180 0 0 0 0 0 639 08:00 AM 08:15 AM 08:30 AM 08:45 AM 8 6 8 6 22 18 15 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 24 23 26 0 0 0 0 40 52 58 24 13 9 5 3 0 0 0 0 53 61 63 27 9 11 18 20 6 10 4 3 0 0 0 0 16 22 23 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 99 107 109 77 Total Grand Total Apprch % Total % 28 75 0 0 103 60 211 22.1 77.9 5.8 20.5 0 0 271 0 0 0 0 26.3 0 174 30 0 429 66 0 86.7 13.3 0 41.6 6.4 0 204 0 495 0 0 48 58 4 23 0 85 160 6 99 0 265 60.4 15.5 2.3 37.4 0.6 9.6 0 25.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 392 1031 )ut:blank 6/29/2( Pagp 47 of R DC Ridgeview Data Collection Morrison, CO 80465 Mead, CO The Highlands AM Peak CR-34 and 1-25 Northbound Ramp File Name : CR-34 and 1-25 NB Ramp AM Site Code : IPO 326 Start Date : 4/3/2018 Page No : 2 0 1-25 Northbound Ramp Out In Total of I 0] 01 01 0I Right Thru Left U Turn 132 T North 132 4/3/2018 07:00 AM 4/32018 08:45 AM Automobiles Left Thru Right Turn I 160] 6] 991 0l I ] 12651 Out In Total 1-25 Northbound Ramo 0 265 4— V c c a rn A 2 0 0 0 A. CD 0, )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 48 of RDC Ridgeview Data Collection Morrison, CO 80465 Mead, CO The Highlands AM Peak CR-34 and 1-25 Northbound Ramp File Name Site Code Start Date Page No : CR-34 and 1-25 NB Ramp AM : I PO 326 : 4/3/2018 :3 CR-34 (Welker Ave) Eastbound CR-34 (Welker Ave) Westbound 1-25 Northbound Ramp Northbound 1-25 Northbound Ramp Southbound Start Time Left I Thru I Right I u ro. I 4. 1.1 Left I Thru I Right I U Turn Ape r,,, Left I That Right I U Tun I ,p, row Left I Thru I Right I U Turn I r, Tarr Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM 07:00 AM 10 20 0 0 30 0 50 07:15 AM 8 30 0 0 38 0 74 07:30 AM 8 44 0 0 52 0 79 07:45 AM 6 42 0 0 48 0 52 8 9 6 13 0 0 0 0 58 83 85 65 8 0 20 1 56 0 1 18 6 13 36 21 0 0 0 0 14 34 92 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IM. Total Total Volume % App. Total PHF 32 136 0 0 168 19 81 0 0 .800 .773 .000 .000 .808 0 255 36 0 291 0 87.6 12.4 0 .000 .807 .692 .000 .856 102 2 76 , 0 180 56.7 1.1 42.2 0 .455 .500 .528 .000 .489 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 102 155 229 153 639 .698 U, a 0 O C D H I-25 Northbound Hamp Out In Total l 0i ( ( 01 01 01 0 Right Thru Left U iTum 70 70 Peak Hour Data T North Peak Hour Beans at 07:00 AM Automobiles 4-1 Left 102 Thr r' U Right Turn 180 I Oi I 180 Out In Total I-25 Northbound Rana 1�D a -i r c C rs 0 0 fia N 0 0 0 w rut:blank 6/29/2( Page 49 of RDC Ridgeview Data Collection Morrison, CO 80465 Mead, CO The Highlands PM Peak CR-34 and 1-25 Northbound Ramp File Name : CR-34 and 1-25 NB Ramp PM Site Code : IPO 326 Start Date : 4/3/2018 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Automobiles CR-34 (Welker Ave) Eastbound CR-34 (Welker Ave) Westbound 1-25 Northbound Ramp Northbound 1-25 Northbound Ramp Southbound Start Time Left I Thru I Right I u turn I App Toy, Left I Thru I Right I U Turn I App . Tore, Left I Thru I Right I u t,an I app rm Left I Thru I Right I U Turn I kw. rend Int. raai 04:00 PM 10 21 0 0 31 0 20 22 0 42 15 0 11 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 99 04:15 PM 10 21 0 0 31 0 30 14 0 44 23 1 18 0 42 0 0 0 0 0 117 04:30 PM 14 25 0 0 39 0 28 19 0 47 11 0 12 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 108 04:45 PM 6 37 0 0 43 0 37 28 0 65 11 0 14 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 13q Total 40 104 0 0 144 0 115 83 0 198 60 1 55 0 116 0 0 0 0 0 458 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM 4 23 0 0 27 4 19 0 0 23 6 18 0 0 24 6 15 0 0 21 0 28 30 0 58 0 31 21 0 52 0 31 26 0 57 0 23 14 0 37 13 0 17 0 30 15 0 22 0 37 22 1 29 0 52 9 1 25 0 35 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 115 112 133 93 Total Grand Total Apprch % Total % 20 75 0 0 95 60 179 0 0 239 25.1 74.9 0 0 6-6 19.6 0 0 26.2 0 113 91 0 204 0 228 174 0 402 0 56.7 43.3 0 0 25 19.1 0 44.1 59 2 93 0 154 119 3 148 44.1 1.1 54.8 13.1 0.3 16.2 0 270 0 0 29.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 453 911 1ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 50 of: RDC L_ Rdgeview Data Collection Morrison, CO 80465 Mead, CO The Highlands PM Peak CR-34 and 1-25 Northbound Ramp File Name : CR-34 and 1-25 NB Ramp PM Site Code : IPO 326 Start Date : 4/3/2018 Page No : 2 ms C I-25 Northbound Ramp Out In Total 1 2371 I 01 0] 01 01 01 237 Right Thru Left uU 'I -f Tun r North 4/3/2018 04:00 PM 4/3/2018 05:45 PM Automobiles 4, r u Left Thru Right Turn I 1191 3J 1481 DI f 1 1 01 I 2701 Out In Total I-25 Northbound Ramo 270 4 4— c C 7 m O J N O a >ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 51 of RDC Ridgeview Data Collection Morrison, CO 80465 Mead, CO The Highlands PM Peak CR-34 and 1-25 Northbound Ramp File Name Site Code Start Date Page No : CR-34 and 1-25 NB Ramp PM : IPO 326 : 4/3/2018 :3 CR-34 (Welker Ave) Eastbound CR-34 (Welker Ave) Westbound 1-25 Northbound Ramp Northbound 1-25 Northbound Ramp Southbound Start Time Left I Thru Right I u rum I app. row Left I Thru I Right I u rum ^pa row Left I Thru I Right I u rum I npp. row Left I ThrU I Right I u Tum I App row Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM 0 37 04:45 PM 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 6 4 4 6 37 23 19 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 27 23 24 0 0 0 28 31 31 28 30 21 26 0 0 0 0 65 58 52 57 11 13 15 22 0 0 0 14 17 22 29 0 0 0 0 25 30 37 52 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ni, Total 133 115 112 133 Total Volume % App. Total PHF 20 97 0 0 117 17.1 82.9 .833 .655 .000 .000 .680 0 0 0 127 105 0 232 0 54.7 45.3 0 .000 .858 .875 .000 892 61 1 82 0 144 42.4 0.7 56.9 .693 .250 .707 .000 .692 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 493 .927 rr U O � 7 1-25 Northbound Hamp Out In Total I 126' 01 126 0! 01 Oi 01 Right Thru Left U 4 1 Turn Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Begins at 04:45 PM Automobiles I I' U Left Thru Right Turn 611 11 821 01 0 I 1441 Out In Total I-25 Northbound Ramo 144 r C C 0, O to F) N 0 a. a O � Al )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 52 of RDC Ridgeview Data Collection Morrison, CO 80465 Mead, CO The Highlands AM Peak CR-34 and 1-25 Southbound Ramp File Name : CR-34 and 1-25 SB Ramp AM Site Code : IPO 326 Start Date : 4/3/2018 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Automobiles CR-34 (Welker Ave) Eastbound CR-34 (Welker Ave) Westbound 1-25 Southbound Ramp Northbound 1-25 Southbound Ramp Southbound Start Time Left I Thru I Right I or.. I ,,,p tam Left I Thru I Right I wt.. I ,p rota Left I Thru I Right l u tun I Am tots Left I Thru I Right I u run I A,,. 'tar Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 17 26 0 43 37 21 0 0 58 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 8 0 21 122 07:15 AM 0 17 28 0 45 50 42 0 0 92 0 0 0 0 0 21 2 8 0 31 168 07:30 AM 0 31 49 0 80 59 79 0 0 138 0 0 0 0 0 21 2 6 0 29 247 07:45 AM 0 20 38 0 58 33 36 0 0 69 0 0 0 0 0 27 0 8 0 35 162 Total 0 85 141 0 226 179 178 0 0 357 0 0 0 0 0 82 4 30 0 116 699 08:00 AM 0 18 17 0 35 25 25 0 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 8 0 20 105 08:15 AM 0 13 15 0 28 32 29 0 0 61 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 6 0 15 104 08:30 AM 0 12 14 0 26 44 32 0 0 76 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 10 0 22 124 08:45 AM 0 13 22 0 35 16 29 0 0 45 0 0 0 0 0 14 1 5 0 20 100 Total 0 56 68 0 124 117 115 0 0 232 0 0 0 0 0 47 1 29 0 77 433 Grand Total 0 141 209 0 350 296 293 0 0 589 0 0 0 0 0 129 5 59 0 193 1132 Apprch % 0 40.3 59.7 0 50.3 49.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 66.8 2.6 30.6 0 Total % 0 12.5 18.5 0 30.9 26.1 25.9 0 0 52 0 0 0 0 0 11.4 0.4 5.2 0 17 )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 53 of RDC Ridgeview Data Collection Morrison, CO 80465 Mead, CO The Highlands AM Peak CR-34 and 1-25 Southbound Ramp File Name : CR-34 and 1-25 SB Ramp AM Site Code : IPO 326 Start Date : 4/3/2018 Page No : 2 N 0 1 I-25 Southbound Ramp Out In Total 1931 I 591 51 1291 01 Right T'ru Left U 1-► TIXn 0 r North 193 4/3/2018 07:00 AM 4/3/2018 08:45 AM Automobiles 4-1 j I' U Left Thru Right Turn 1 1 01 01 01 01 1 01 Out In Total 1-25 Southbound Ramo 510 510 4—V m c C 0 ID rut:blank 6/29/2( Page 54 of RDC riidgeview Data Collection Morrison, CO 80465 Mead, CO The Highlands AM Peak CR-34 and 1-25 Southbound Ramp File Name : CR-34 and 1-25 SB Ramp AM Site Code : IPO 326 Start Date : 4/3/2018 Page No : 3 CR-34 (Welker Ave) Eastbound CR-34 (Welker Ave) Westbound 1-25 Southbound Ramp Northbound 1-25 Southbound Ramp Southbound Start Time Left Thru I Right I u Turn I app rar Left I Thru I Right u rum I app ra, Left ( Thru I Right I u rind App raw Left Thru I Right I u Tun I App rotes Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM 07:00 AM 0 17 26 0 43 37 21 07:15 AM 0 17 28 0 45 50 42 07:30 AM 0 31 49 0 80 59 79 07:45 AM 0 20 38 0 58 33 36 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 58 92 138 69 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 2 21 2 27 13 0 8 0 21 8 0 31 6 0 29 0 8 0 35 Ira. Toral Total Volume % App. Total 0 85 141 0 226 0 37.6 62.4 0 179 178 0 0 357 50.1 49.9 0 0 .758 .563 .000 .000 .647 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 82 4 30 0 116 70.7 3.4 25.9 .759 .500 .938 .000 .829 0 122 168 247 162 699 PHF .000 .685 .719 .000 .706 .000 .000 .000 .000 000 .707 k 1-25 Southbound Harp Out In Total 1161 I 1 301 41 821 01 Right Thru Left U y Ttxn 0 116 Peak Hour Data T Peak Hour Begins at 07:00 AM Automobiles T r Left Thru Right Turn I 01 01 oI 01 1 I I 324i 1 01 Out In Total 1-25 Southbound Rarno 324 C 7 c C 0 oa O 01 0 F.0 A a o m A )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 55 of DC Pidgeview Data Coflecoon Morrison, CO 80465 Mead, CO The Highlands PM Peak CR-34 and 1-25 Southbound Ramp File Name : CR-34 and 1-25 SB Ramp PM Site Code : IPO 326 Start Date : 4/3/2018 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Automobiles CR-34 (Welker Ave) Eastbound CR-34 (Welker Ave) Westbound 1-25 Southbound Ramp Northbound 1-25 Southbound Ramp Southbound Start Time Left I Thru I Right I u Tum I ryrp raw Left I Thru I Right I u rum I A,* Tad Left I Thru I Right I U Turn I App Taal Left I Thru I Right I arum I App. raw I,t Tot l 04:00 PM 0 24 20 0 44 6 28 0 0 34 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 8 0 15 93 04:15 PM 0 22 14 0 36 9 42 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 11 0 20 107 04:30 PM 0 31 21 0 52 11 27 0 0 38 0 0 0 0 0 8 1 9 0 18 10$ 04:45 PM 0 35 19 0 54 10 38 0 0 48 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 10 0 19 121 Total 0 112 74 0 186 36 135 0 0 171 0 0 0 0 0 33 1 38 0 72 429 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 25 16 17 16 22 17 11 18 0 0 0 0 47 33 28 34 6 15 19 11 36 30 33 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 45 52 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 6 8 5 0 0 0 11 8 7 5 0 14 0 14 0 15 0 11 103 92 95 78 Total Grand Total Apprch % Total % 0 74 68 0 142 0 186 142 0 56.7 43.3 0 23.3 17.8 0 328 0 0 41.2 51 121 87 256 25.4 74.6 10.9 32.1 0 0 172 0 0 343 0 0 0 0 43 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 1 31 0 54 55 2 69 0 126 43.7 1.6 54.8 6.9 0.3 8.7 0 15.8 0 364 797 )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 56 of RDC Ridgeview Data Collection Morrison, CO 80465 Mead, CO The Highlands PM Peak CR-34 and 1-25 Southbound Ramp File Name : CR-34 and 1-25 SB Ramp PM Site Code : IPO 326 Start Date : 4/3/2018 Page No : 2 m Q m m C.1 U 5 O 1-25 Southbound Ramp Out In Total 1 1261 0 126 691 � 2f 55] 01 Right Thru Left U 1 L► Tum r North 4/3/2018 04:00 PM 4/3/2018 05:45 PM Automobiles U Left Thru Right Turn 1 01 01 01 01 i 1 1 1 01 Out In Total 1-25 Southbound Ramo 231 231 * D O C C � O A o Yl )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 57 of RDC Ridgeview Dots Collection Morrison, CO 80465 Mead, CO The Highlands PM Peak CR-34 and 1-25 Southbound Ramp File Name : CR-34 and 1-25 SB Ramp PM Site Code : IPO 326 Start Date : 4/3/2018 Page No : 3 CR-34 (Welker Ave) Eastbound CR-34 (Welker Ave) Westbound 1-25 Southbound Ramp Northbound 1-25 Southbound Ramp Southbound Start Time Left I Thru I Right I u rwn I App Tay Left l Thru I Right I u Turn I app. Tay Left I Thai ( Right ( u Tao F app ray Left I Thru I Right um., sn npp Tay eaK flour Analysis I-rom 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 0 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:15 PM 04:15 PM 04:30 PM 04:45 PM 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 22 31 35 25 14 21 19 22 0 0 0 0 36 52 54 47 9 42 0 0 51 11 27 0 0 38 10 38 0 0 48 6 36 0 0 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 8 1 9 0 3 0 11 0 20 9 0 18 10 0 19 11 0 14 IM. Total 107 108 121 103 Total Volume APP . Total PHF 0 113 76 0 189 0 59.8 40.2 0 .000 .807 .864 .000 •875 36 143 0 0 179 20.1 79.9 0 0 .818 .851 .000 .000 .877 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 29 1 41 0 71 40.8 1.4 57.7 .806 .250 .932 .000 .888 0 439' .907. oo a- m 0 c 7 j t — I -25 Southbound Harr Out In Total 0 71 Right Thru Left U Turn Peak Hour Data r North Peak Horn Buns at 04:15 PM Automobiles 1 T P'U Left Thru Right Turn 01 01 01 01 I 1131 I 0I Out In Total I-25 Southbound Ramo 113 t_g! -4 4—g m s c C 0 0 v m N n t:blank 6/29/2( Page 58 of: RDC Ridgev.ew Data Collection Morrison, CO 80465 Mead, CO The Highlands AM Peak CR-34 (Welker Ave) and CR-7 (3rd St) Groups Printed- Automobiles File Name Site Code Start Date Page No : CR-34 and CR-7 AM : IPO 326 : 4/3/2018 :1 CR-34 (Welker Ave) Eastbound CR-34 (Welker Ave) Westbound CR-7 (3rd St) Northbound CR-7 (3rd St) Southbound Start Tlme Lett I Thru I Right' u rum I nyp. ran Left I Thru I Right I u ru«, I app Total Left I Thru I Right I u rum I M,p. raa Left I Thru I Right I u run I ,pprow lr,t. Total 1 07:00 AM 3 17 11 0 31 7 15 6 0 28 12 6 1 0 19 22 26 5 0 53 131 07:15 AM 2 18 7 0 27 7 34 7 0 48 17 13 2 0 32 24 19 8 0 51 158 07:30 AM 8 61 16 0 85 3 69 12 0 84 33 6 1 0 40 15 20 14 0 49 258 07:45 AM 4 37 11 0 52 1 34 14 0 49 15 9 1 0 25 15 14 5 0 34 160 Total 17 133 45 0 195 18 152 39 0 209 77 34 5 0 116 76 79 32 0 187 707 08:00 AM 08:15 AM 08:30 AM 08:45 AM 1 2 1 10 13 18 15 33 7 8 3 15 0 0 0 0 21 28 19 58 6 5 2 0 14 14 26 24 14 0 34 15 0 34 11 0 39 10 0 34 6 9 13 5 13 9 26 8 6 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 21 20 22 36 19 4 13 11 7 17 20 15 3 12 6 28 0 0 0 0 29 33 39 54 105 115 119 182 Total Grand Total Apprch % Total % 14 79 33 0 126 31 212 78 9.7 66 24.3 2.5 17.3 6.4 0 321 0 0 26.1 13 78 50 0 141 31 230 89 8.9 65.7 25.4 2.5 18.7 7.2 0 350 0 0 28.5 58 31 10 0 99 135 65 15 62.8 30.2 7 11 5.3 1.2 0 215 0 0 17.5 47 59 49 123 138 81 36 40.4 23.7 10 11.2 6.6 0 155 0 342 0 0 27.9 521 1228 )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 59 of RDC Ridgeview Data Collection Morrison, CO 80465 Mead, CO The Highlands AM Peak CR-34 (Welker Ave) and CR-7 (3rd St) File Name : CR-34 and CR-7 AM Site Code : IPO 326 Start Date : 4/3/2018 Page No : 2 t0 3 CR-7 (3rd St) Out In Total 3421 I I I 81) 138] 123] 01 Right Thru LeftU �► Tum 185 I North 527 4/3/2018 07:00 AM 4/3/2018 08:45 AM Automobiles Tr' u Left Thru Right Turn I 1351 65) 151 0] I 1 I I 2151 Out In Total CR-713rd St) 247 462 CO 8 0 O 0 nut:blank 6/29/2( Page 60 of Flidgeview Data Collection Morrison, CO 80465 Mead, CO The Highlands AM Peak CR-34 (Welker Ave) and CR-7 (3rd St) File Name Site Code Start Date Page No : CR-34 and CR-7 AM : I PO 326 : 4/3/2018 :3 CR-34 (Welker Ave) Eastbound CR-34 (Welker Ave) Westbound CR-7 (3rd St) Northbound CR-7 (3rd St) Southbound Start Time Left I Thru Right u Turn ,gyp, rood Left I Thru I Right I U Turn l app. rml Left J Thru Right I u run I am Tam Left I Thru I Right I U Tun I App rots Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM 07:00 AM 3 17 11 0 31 7 15 6 07:15 AM 2 18 7 0 27 7 34 7 07:30 AM 8 61 16 0 85 3 69 12 07:45 AM 4 37 11 0 52 1 34 14 0 0 0 0 28 48 84 49 12 17 33 15 6 13 6 9 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 19 32 40 25 22 24 15 15 26 19 20 14 5 8 14 5 0 0 0 0 53 51 49 34 la. Teal Total Volume q App. Total PHF 17 133 45 0 195 8.7 68.2 23.1 0 .531 .545 .703 .000 -574 18 152 39 0 209 8-6 72.7 18.7 0 .643 .551 .696 .000 .622 77 34 5 0 116 66.4 29.3 4.3 .583 .654 .625 .000 -725 0 76 79 32 40.6 42.2 17.1 .792 .760 .571 .000 .882 0 187 0 131 158 258 160 707 .685 2 U3 O eH-I (3rd St) Out in Total 1871 ( 1 32j 791 761 01 Ri M Thru Left U 14 Turn 90 277 Peak Hour Data T North Peak Hour Begins at 07:00 AM Automobiles Left Thru Right Turn 771 341 51 01 1 142; us) Out In Total CR-7 t3rd St) 258 I- m c 3 C 7 8 CO O li 3 )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 61 of: RDC Ridgeview Data Collection Morrison, CO 80465 Mead, CO The Highlands PM Peak CR-34 (Welker Ave) and CR-7 (3rd St) Groups Printed- Automobiles File Name Site Code Start Date Page No : CR-34 and CR-7 PM : IPO 326 : 4/3/2018 :1 CR-34 (Welker Ave) Eastbound CR-34 (Welker Ave) Westbound CR-7 (3rd St) Northbound CR-7 (3rd St) Southbound Start Time Left I Thru I Right I u rum I App rar Left I Thru I Right I u rum 1 app ram Left I Thru I Right I u run 1 nqr raa Left I Thru I Right I um. I App. MOM lnt. Total) 04:00 PM 8 23 6 0 37 7 18 11 0 36 14 18 3 0 35 15 10 8 0 33 141! 04:15 PM 5 19 8 0 32 1 20 29 0 50 12 23 8 0 43 9 15 0 0 24 149; 04:30 PM 6 19 8 0 33 3 21 15 0 39 14 20 4 0 38 25 16 19 0 60 1701 I 04:45 PM 16 48 29 0 93 5 28 21 0 54 25 31 4 0 60 10 21 15 0 46 253! Total 35 109 51 0 195 16 87 76 0 179 65 92 19 0 176 59 62 42 0 163 7131 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM 8 5 4 5 19 14 12 13 10 9 6 3 0 0 0 0 37 28 22 21 1 2 3 3 14 15 20 12 23 19 17 14 0 0 0 0 38 36 40 29 14 34 7 0 55 15 27 4 0 46 7 25 8 0 40 5 27 3 0 35 16 11 10 17 17 18 11 16 1 7 4 3 0 0 0 0 34 36 25 36 164! 1461 1271 121; Total Grand Total Apprch % Total % 22 58 28 0 108 57 167 79 18.8 55.1 26.1 4.5 13.1 6.2 0 303 0 0 23.8 9 61 73 0 143 25 148 149 7.8 48 46.3 2 11.6 11.7 0 322 0 0 25.3 30.1 58.2 11.6 41 113 22 0 176 106 205 41 0 352 0 8.3 16.1 3.2 0 27.7 54 62 15 113 124 57 38.4 42.2 19.4 8.9 9.8 4.5 0 131 0 294 0 0 23.1 5581 1271 rut:blank 0/29/2( Page 62 of RDC Ridgeview Data Collection Morrison, CO 80465 Mead, CO The Highlands PM Peak CR-34 (Welker Ave) and CR-7 (3rd St) File Name Site Code Start Date Page No : CR-34 and CR-7 PM : IPO 326 : 4/3/2018 :2 m 0 M n U, N- CR-7 (3rd St) Out In Total 4111 1 North 705 4/3/2018 04:00 PM 4/32018 05:45 PM Automobiles Tu Left Thru Right Turn I 1061 2051 411 0 I 228 1 3521 Out In Total CR-7 (3rd St) 580 N 01 0 )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 63 of RDC Ridgeview Data Collection Morrison, CO 80465 Mead, CO The Highlands PM Peak CR-34 (Welker Aye) and CR-7 (3rd St) File Name Site Code Start Date Page No : CR-34 and CR-7 PM : I PO 326 : 4/3/2018 :3 CR-34 (Welker Aye) Eastbound CR-34 (Welker Aye) Westbound CR-7 (3rd St) Northbound CR-7 (3rd St) Southbound Start Time Left I Thru I Right u Tin I App. rota Left 1 '(hni Right I Li Tun,,,,,,,,„,, rota Left I Thru Right I u Tun I App. Totem I Thru I Right u run I not rota Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:15 PM 04:15 PM 5 19 8 0 32 1 20 29 04:30 PM 6 19 8 0 33 3 21 15 04:45 PM 16 48 29 0 93 5 28 21 05:00 PM 8 19 10 0 37 1 14 23 0 0 39 0 54 0 50 38 12 14 25 14 23 20 31 34 8 4 4 7 0 0 0 0 43 38 60 55 9 15 25 16 10 21 16 17 19 15 0 0 0 0 0 24 60 46 34 Mt Total I Total Volume % App. Total PHF 35 105 55 0 195 17.9 53.8 28.2 .547 .547 .474 .000 .524 0 10 83 88 5.5 45.9 48.6 0 0 181 .500 .741 .759 .000 .838 65 108 23 0 196 33.2 55.1 11.7 0 .650 .794 .719 .000 .817 60 69 35 36.6 42.1 21.3 .600 .821 .461 .000 .683 0 164 0 149 170 253 164 736 .727 U3 O CO co U, m t. H -T (3rd St) Out In Total 231 1641 395 I 351 :Ight 691 60( Thru Left 01 U Turn Peak Hour Data ms North tr; C H Peak Hour Begins at 04:15 PM Automobiles r' U Left Thru Right Turn X651 108( 231 ` 0I 1341 I 1961 Out In Total CR-7 13rd St) 330 1 4—g: m c C 8 8i O 0 8 CD 2O 33 >ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 64 of RDC Ridgeview Data Collection Morrison, CO 80465 Mead, CO The Highlands AM Peak CR-36 and CR-7 Groups Printed- Automobiles File Name Site Code Start Date Page No : CR-36 and CR-7 AM : IPO 326 : 4/3/2018 :1 CR-36 Eastbound CR-36 Westbound CR-7 Northbound CR-7 Southbound Start Time Left I Thru I Right I u rum I Apo. Tow Left I Thru I Right I u Turn I ,p raw Left I Thru I Right I um. I na. TM* Left I Thru I Right I U Turn I ,Ky. Tao int Total 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 23 3 0 0 26 0 6 3 0 9 0 13 0 0 13 48 07:15 AM 0 1 1 0 2 19 2 7 0 28 0 9 4 0 13 0 29 1 0 30 73 07:30 AM 0 0 1 0 1 19 1 1 0 21 0 13 0 0 13 0 22 2 0 24 59 07:45 AM 1 0 0 0 1 15 2 0 0 17 1 8 6 0 15 1 13 0 0 14 47 Total 1 1 2 0 4 76 8 8 0 92 1 36 13 0 50 1 77 3 0 81 227 08:00 AM 08:15 AM 08:30 AM 08:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 14 8 17 17 0 0 3 3 3 1 O 18 O 11 O 21 0 18 0 0 0 8 5 6 13 6 11 5 9 0 14 0 16 0 12 0 22 1 4 0 0 11 22 16 24 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 12 26 22 24 44 53 55 66 Total Grand Total Apprch % Total % 1 0 1 0 2 2 1 33.3 16.7 0.4 0.2 3 50 0.7 0 6 0 0 1.3 56 2 10 0 68 132 10 18 0 160 82.5 6.2 11.2 29.7 2.2 4 0 O 36 1 32 31 0 64 2 68 44 0 114 1.8 59.6 38.6 0.4 15.3 9.9 0 0 25.6 5 73 6 0 6 150 9 3.6 90.9 5.5 1.3 33,7 2 84 0 165 0 0 37.1 218 445 )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 65 of RDC Ridgeview Data Collection Morrison, CO 80465 Mead, CO The Highlands AM Peak CR-36 and CR-7 File Name : CR-36 and CR-7 AM Site Code : IPO 326 Start Date : 4/3/2018 Page No : 2 N CR-7 Out In Total 1651 88 253 91 1501 61 01 Right Thru Left U 4► Tien 1 North 4/3/2018 07:00 AM 413/2018 08:45 AM Automobiles 285 In CR-7 Total 399 N rut:blank 6/29/2( Page 66 of RDC Ridgewew Data Collection Morrison, CO 80465 Mead, CO The Highlands AM Peak CR-36 and CR-7 File Name Site Code Start Date Page No : CR-36 and CR-7 AM : I PO 326 : 4/3/2018 :3 CR-36 Eastbound CR-36 Westbound CR-7 Northbound CR-7 Southbound Start Time Left I Thru J Right I u Turn I kq. Tae Left I Thru I Right I U Turn I App TOW Left Thru I Right I u run I App. ra., Left I ThrU I Right 1 u Tvn I App. Tom Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM 07:00 AM 07:15 AM 07:30 AM 07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 19 19 15 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 7 1 0 26 28 21 17 0 0 0 6 9 13 8 3 4 0 6 0 0 0 0 9 13 13 15 0 0 0 13 29 22 13 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 13 30 24 14 lot TOW Total Volume % App. Total PHF 1 1 2 25 25 50 0 0 4 .250 .250 .500 .000 .500 76 8 8 0 92 82.6 8.7 8.7 .826 .667 .286 .000 .821 0 1 36 13 0 50 2 72 26 0 .250 .692 .542 .000 -833 1 77 3 1.2 95.1 3.7 0 0 81 .250 .664 .375 .000 .675 48 73 59 47 227 .777 0 00 N t h D H Out 45 Total 126 i 1 1 31 771 II 01 Right Thru Left U +i Turn Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Begins at 07:00 AM Automobiles r' U Left Thru Right Turn 11 361 131 01 I 155; 501 Out In CR-7 205 Total 0)) 7 C - c 4 (off N as 0) V )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 67 of RDC Ridgeview Data Collection Morrison, CO 80465 Mead, CO The Highlands PM Peak CR-36 and CR-7 Groups Printed- Automobiles File Name Site Code Start Date Page No : CR-36 and CR-7 PM : I PO 326 : 4/3/2018 :1 CR-36 Eastbound CR-36 Westbound CR-7 Northbound CR-7 Southbound Start Time Left I Thru I Right I arum I app Teti Left I Thru Right I u rum I app rmi Left I Thru I Right I u run I app rm Left I Thru I Right I u run Mo. row int. Tara l 04:00 PM 0 1 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 7 1 20 16 0 37 4 9 0 0 13 58 04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 1 0 9 2 12 17 0 31 3 10 0 0 13 53 04:30 PM 0 1 0 0 1 16 1 2 0 19 0 23 13 0 36 0 12 0 0 12 68 04:45 PM 1 2 0 0 3 10 0 2 0 12 1 35 20 0 56 1 9 0 0 10 81 Total 1 4 0 0 5 41 1 5 0 47 4 90 66 0 160 8 40 0 0 48 260 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM 1 1 2 1 3 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 2 3 3 8 8 6 10 0 0 2 1 4 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 12 11 11 12 0 0 0 24 25 14 23 20 20 28 19 0 0 0 0 45 45 42 42 3 2 1 4 19 11 9 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 13 10 14 85 71 66 71 Total Grand Total Apprch % Total % 33.3 61.1 5.6 1.1 2 0.2 5 7 1 0 13 6 11 1 0 18 0 0 3.3 32 3 11 73 4 16 78.5 4.3 17.2 13.2 0.7 2.9 0 46 0 93 0 0 16.8 1 86 87 0 174 5 176 153 1.5 52.7 45.8 0.9 31.8 27.7 0 334 0 0 60.4 10 49 1 0 18 89 1 16.7 82.4 0.9 3.3 16.1 0.2 60 0 108 0 0 19.5 293 553 )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 68 of RDC Ridgeview Data Collection Morrison, CO 80465 Mead, CO The Highlands PM Peak CR-36 and CR-7 File Name : CR-36 and CR-7 PM Site Code : IPO 326 Start Date : 4/3/2018 Page No : 2 18 I — co N m co co C CC U 5 O CR-7 Out In Total I 1081 1 1 1 11 891 181 01 Right Thru Left U � 1 '-► Tum 198 T North 306 4/312018 04:00 PM 4/3/2018 05:45 PM Automobiles T ~I I U Left Thru Right Turn I 51 1761 1531 01 1 1 I 1631 I 3341 Out In Total CR-7 497 CD N CJI )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 69 of RDC Ridges/taw Data Collection Morrison, CO 80465 Mead, CO The Highlands PM Peak CR-36 and CR-7 File Name Site Code Start Date Page No : CR-36 and CR-7 PM : IPO 326 : 4/3/2018 :3 CR-36 Eastbound CR-36 Westbound CR-7 Northbound CR-7 Southbound Start Time Left I Thru I Right I u Tum I ,yp. ram Left I Thru I Right I U Turn I App. Tot,' Len I Thru I Right u Turn l App ram Left I Thru I Right I u rum 1 App, ram Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM 0 1 0 0 1 16 1 2 0 0 3 10 1 3 1 0 5 8 1 1 0 0 2 8 04:30 PM 04:45 PM 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 0 0 0 2 2 4 3 0 0 0 0 19 12 12 11 0 0 23 35 24 25 13 20 20 20 0 0 0 0 36 56 45 45 0 1 3 2 12 9 19 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 10 23 13 H. Taal I 68 81 85 71 Total Volume % App. Total PHF 3 7 1 0 11 27.3 63.6 9-1 .750 .583 .250 .000 .550 0 42 1 11 0 54 77.8 1-9 20.4 .656 .250 .688 .000 .711 0 2 107 73 0 182 1.1 58.8 40.1 0 .500 .764 .913 .000 .813 6 51 1 10.3 87.9 1.7 .500 .671 .250 .000 .630 0 58 0 305 .897 O eH-7 Out In Total I 581 121 179 1 1 1 11 511 61 01 ht Thru Left ft U Tun Peak Hour Data I Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 PM Automobiles Left Thru Right Turn 21 1071 731 01 1 I 1821 Out In Total CR-7 94 276 Cu N O g a a. O T rut:blank 6/29/2( Page 70 of Appendix C: Intersection Spreadsheets - 2023 Horizon Year )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 71 of INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SHEET \A-1 I n \M Out PM In PSI Out Project: Location: Scenario: ('t. Date N/S Street: E/\% Street: The Highlands Mead, CO Short -Terns llori, uu 4/3/2018 1-25 NB Ramps CR-34 (Welker Avenue) NIovalness PNF \L\1 !'1 kK t1Ot R 0.80 0.77 0.81 0.69 Net Leh Trips: Annual Growth Rate: Growth Factor: t). $6 0. 40 121 I 137 80 3.0% 0.159274 0. Existing Year: 201 8 Buildout Year: '0Z3 ()c:cription CR-34 (Welker Ai.enue► F .tuba Right CR-34 t :It (Welker Avenue) v4'estbound Right Let! 1-25 NB Ramps Northbound knit( Lett I-25 NB Ramps Southbound Right through through fh;uu;jh Through 2018 Traffic Count _ 136 0 0) 255 3t-. 102 ' ,r, 0 0 0 Count Balancing 0 0 i i ,, 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 2018 Existing Traffic 136 1 ) zr• 102 2 76 0 0 0 Growth Factor (0.03 per year) 0.159 0.159 0.159 ,) 159 U. 15') 0.15'9 0.159 0.159 0.159 1 ; x 0.159 0.159 2023 Background Growth 5 22 0 , 41 f, 16 0 12 0 0 2023 Background Traffic ;7 158 0 29t, 4 118 2 ,., f . O Project Traffic Percent Assignment Inbound i°o 0% 0% i 0% -:f I" 0 0% 0% I ' _ r Inbound Project traffic 0 0 0 1 _U 0 0 _ Percent Assignment Outbound 35°0 5% 0% 0% 0` 0°•, 0°0 0% e p ; Outbound Project Trafi"ic t'- 0 0 0 0 0 Total Project Traffic 42 n 0 0 2 (1 0 i 2023 Buildout Total 164 U 298 88 i i 0 Percent Impact I Approach) 19 8% 0.6° s s' (herall Percent Impact Moscrocnt PHI fru 0.83 0.66 PM PLAK 11O1 R 0.86 0.88 0.69 025 Ue.cription CR-34 di (Welker Avenue) Eastbound �fi Right t.R- 34 Left (Welker Avenue) Westbound Rid _ I-_'5 'I3 Ramps Northbound Right i.�tt 1-'5 `•ii ltamp, Sout hbound k; rc alit 1 hr,,aaf: I hrough through [ h..�u��► 2018 Traffic ( ount :0 97 0 0 127 I0' 61 I ,' 0 0 0 Count Balancing i 0 0 (I 0 (; 0 ii 0 0 i 2018 Existing Traffic '0 c)7 0 rt $27 Rh 61 1 g'_ 0 0 o t srowth Factor (0 03 per year ) 0.159 0-159 0.159 0.159 0 159 0.159 0 l )9 0.159 0 159 0.159 2023 Background Growth 15 0 20 17 10 0 0 0 0 2023 Background Traffic _ 112 0 147 I _: - I i Project Traffic Percent Assignment Inbound 0% 0% 5° ()° ti ,>Qu {) Inbound Project Traffic 0 0 0 0 1: ; Percent Assignment Outbound 35% 5% 0% 0°0 outbound Project Traffic ► 0 , Total Project Traffic - 4 : i •' Buildout Total 51 116 _.Est impact (Approach) 19 2_°. _ Overall Percent Impact 15 4° k. Jut Ides's/196 21403 2 the highland+'i4 - attah s, s (thehtghlanc/s-tiaduw-?0'3hut/d .rh/tnt 7/ )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 72 of INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SHEET AM In AM Out PM In PM Out Project: Location: Scenario: Ct. Date N/S Street: E/W Street: I\ hi\L'ttb.,1t I'111 1h.sriljtb„ri CR-34 It (Welker Avenue) Eastbound Right CR-34 l kit (Welker Avenue) Ltd Right Left 1-25 SR Ramps Northbound Right l cit I-2; SR Ramp: Southbound Ri4hi Through I hioueh I Inoue,.i I hiou.h 2018 Traffic Count 85 141 179 178 0 0 0 0 a 10 Count Balancing n 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1 g 0 2018 Existing Traffic • - 141 179 178 n 0 0 4 30 Growth Factor t0 03 per %mar► 0.159 0.159 0.159 0.159 0.159 0.159 t 0.159 H o ;. 0.159 0.159 2023 Background 4,i.,Kt(l 0 14 22 29 28 0 lH 0 0 1 5 2023 Background 'I raffic 99 163 208 206 u 0 0 i 35 Project Traffic Percent Assignment Inbound 0% 0% 0% 55% 0°° 0% 0% 0% 35% Inbound Project Traffic 0 0 0 22 n 0 0 n I I Percent Assignment Outbound 40% 50% 0% 0% 0°A. i 0% 0% 000 0% 0% Outbound Project Traffic 48 61 0 0 0 1, 0 (1 0 4 •1 etal Project Traffic 4$ 61 0 22 0 0 0 0 14 2023 Buildout Total 14, 224 208 228 0 1 i 5 49 Percent Impact (Approach) _ 29 4°'0 5.0% 9.4° ° The Highlands Mead, CO Short -Term Horizon 4/3/2018 I -2S SB Ramps CR-34 (Welker Avenue) AM PEAK HOUR 0.69 0.72 0.76 0.56 Net New Trips: Annual Growth Rate: Growth Factor 40 121 I 137 80 3.0% 0.159274 Fisting Year: 2018 Buildnut Year: 2023 0.76 0.50 0.94 Overall Percent I ! 11 p 3, t I%losement PIIF Description CR-34 Left (Welker Avenue) Eastbound Right CR-34 Left (Welker Avenue) Westbound Right Left 1-25 SB IL •, ; Right Left 1-25 SE Ramps Seutbboun Right Northbound Through through -Through I !trough 2018 Traffic Count ii 113 76 36 143 1) 0 0 0 _'9 1 41 Count Balancing +1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2018 Existing f rafftc (I 113 76 36 143 0 0 0 0 ,0 I II (,rn %th factor (0.03 per war) a 159 0.159 0.159 0.159 0.159 0.159 0.159 0.159 0.159 0.159 0 159 2023 Background Growth IS 12 6 23 0 0 0 i 0 2023 Background 1 raffia 131 88 42 166 i 0 u ;4 1 -1r Project Traffic Percent Assignment Inbound 0% 0% 0% ;coy. 0°, 0% 0% i 0% 0°o 35% Inbound Project Traffic 0 0 0 0 ? 0 0 0 n 48 Percem Assignment Outbound 0% 40% 50% 0% 00 0°, k Outbound Project traffic 32 40 0 0 0 e I utal Project Traffic 32 40 0 7, U 2023 Buildout Total 128 42 241 0 Percent impact IApproach) 26.5% PM PEAK II ( ► ( R 0.81 0.86 0.82 0.85 0.81 0.25 0.93 Overall Percent Impact k, idur Ides•'O96'I4O3 2 the highlands 1 4- anal► si.sfthehighla,tds-taudura-?023burld.xls/inn. h2 nut:blank 6/29/2( Page 73 of INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SHEET AM In AM Out PM In PM Out Project: Location: Scenario: CL Date NUS Street: E/W Street: The Highlands Mead, CO Short -Term Horizon 4/3/2018 CR-7 (3rd Street) CR-34 (Welker Avenue) (Movement P1WF Description CR-341 Lett Welker Avenue) Eastbound Right CR-34 Lett (Welker .Avenue) Westbound. Roth) Left CR-7 (3rd Street) Northbound Through Right Leo CR-7 (3rd Street) Southbinud Through Right Through Through 2018 Traffic Count 17 133 45 IR 152 39 77 34 5 76 79 32 Count Balancing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2018 Existing Traffic 17 133 45 18 152 39 77 34 5 76 79 32 Growth Factor (0 O3 per year) 0.159 0.159 0-159 0.159 0.159 0.159 0.159 0.159 0.159 0.159 0.159 0.159 2023 Background Growth 3 21 7 3 24 6 12 5 I 12 13 5 2023 Background Traffic 20 154 ... 21 176 45 89 39 6 tt 92 37 Project Traffic Percent Asvgnment Inbound 0% 0% 0% 0°'° 90% 0% 5°'a 0% 0% 098 0°e Inbound Project traffic 2 0 0 0 0 36 0 _ 0 0 0 0 Percent .Assignment Outbound 11°'° 0%% 0% 0% 0°v 0°e 0% 0% 0% 90% 5% 5% Outbound Protect traffic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 109 6 6 Total Project Traffic _ 0 0 0 0 36 0 2 0 109 6 6 2023 Bundoor Total 22 154 52 21 176 81 89 41 6 197 98 43 Percent Impact (Approach) 0.9% 129% I 5% 35.9% AM PEAK HOUR 0.53 0.55 0.70 0.64 0.55 0.70 Net New Trips: Annual Growth Rate: Growth Factor: 038 0-65 40 I 121 I 137 I 80 3.0% 0.159274 0.63 Existing Year: Buildout Year: 0-79 0.76 2018 2023 0.57 Overall Percent Impart 16.4% 'overman Pith 0.55 0.55 PM PEAK HOUR 0.47 0 SO 0.74 0.76 0.65 0.79 0.72 0.60 0.82 0.46 Description CR-341 Lett Welker Avenue) Eastbound Right CR-34(Welker Avenue) K estbound Lett Through Right Lett CR-7 (3rd Street) Northbound Right Lett CR-7 (3rd Street) Soutbbound Rtght Through Through Through 2018-Iraffie Count 35 105 55 10 83 88 65 108 23 60 69 35 Count Balancing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2018 Existing Traffic 35 105 55 10 03 88 65 108 23 60 69 35 Growth Factor (0 03 per year l 0.1 59 0.159 0.1 59 0.159 0 159 0.159 0.159 0.159 0.159 0.159 (1.159 0.159 2823 Background Growth 6 I' 9 2 13 14 10 17 4 10 II 6 2023 Background Traffic 4) 122 64 12 96 102 75 125 27 70 80 41 Project Traffic Percent Assgnment Inbound Inbound Project frailty ,7 0% 0% 0% 0% 90% 0% 5% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0 0 0 0 123 0 7 0 0 0 0 Percent Assignment Outbound 0% 0% 0% 0°° 0°° 0% 0%. 0% 0% 90% 5% 5% Outbound Project Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 72 4 4 Total Project Traffic 7 0 0 0 0 123 0 7 0 72 4 4 2023 Buildout Total 48 122 64 12 96 225 75 132 27 142 84 45 ercent Impact (Auoroach) 3.0% 36.9% 30% 29.5.. Overall Percent Impact 20 2% k: clue Wel 096214032 the heehlstwItv4 - mmhvrs ftheInghlrrrrrls-06u 16 r-20'36tJd rl.Jmr '3 5 1O18 3ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 74 of INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SHEET AM In AM Out PM In PM Out Project: Location: Scenario: Ct. Date N/S Street: E/W Street: Movement P11 Description Lett CR-36 Eastbound Right Left CR-36 Westbound Through Right Left CR-7 Northbound Through Right Left CR-7 Southbound Through Right Through 2018 Traffic Canal I I 2 76 8 8 I 36 13 I 77 3 Count Balancing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2018 Existing Traffic I I 2 76 8 8 I 36 13 I 77 3 Growth Factor 10.03 per year) 0.159 0.159 0.159 0.159 0.159 0.159 0.159 0.159 0.159 0.159 0.159 0.159 2023 Background Growth 0 0 0 12 I I 0 6 2 0 12 0 2023 Background Traffic I I - R8 9 9 I 42 15 I 89 3 Project Traffic Percent Assignment Inbound 0% 0% tP-a 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 25% 0% 0% 0% Inbound Project Traffic 0 0 (1 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 Percent .Assignment Outbound 0% 0% (1% 25% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Outbound Pnryctit Traffic 0 0 0 30 00 II 0 0 0 0 0 Total Project Traffic 0 0 0 3(i 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 2823 Buildoat Total I I 2 118 9 9 I 42 25 I 89 3 Percent Impact IApproachl 0.0% '-2.1% 14.7% 0.0% The Highlands Mead, CO Short -Term Horizon 4/3/2018 CR-7 CR-36 AM PEAK HOUR 0 2 0.25 0.50 0.83 0.67 0.29 Net New Trips: Annual Growth Rate: Growth Factor: 0.25 0.69 3.0% 0.159274 034 Existing Year: Buildout Year: 0.25 0.66 2018 2023 0.38 Overall Percent Impact 13.3% PM PEAK HOUR 0.75 038 0.25 0-66 0.25 0.69 0_50 0.76 0.91 0.50 0.67 0.25 Description Leh CR-3b Eastbound Right Lett CR-36 Westbound Through Right Leff CR-7 Northbound Right Lett CR-7 Southbound Through Right Through Through 2018 Traffic Count 3 7 I 42 I II 2 107 73 n 51 I Count Balancing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2018 Existing Traffic 3 7 I 42 I II 2 107 73 6 51 I Growth Factor 10 03 per year) 0.159 0.1 59 0.159 0.159 (1 159 0.159 0.159 0.159 0.159 0.159 0.159 0.159 2023 Background Growth 0 I 0 7 0 _ 0 17 12 I 8 0 2023 Background Traffic 3 8 I 49 1 13 2 124 85 7 59 I Project Traffic Percent Assignment Inbound 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% IW% 0% 25% 0% 0% 0% Inbound Project Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 0 0 0 Percent Assignment Outbound 0% 0% (1% 25% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Outbound Project Traffic 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Project Traffic 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 34 0 0 0 2023 Buildout Total 3 R I 69 I 13 2 124 119 7 59 1 ercent Impact (Approach) 0TP.6 24 I% 13.904 0.0% Overall Percent Impact 13 3% k. 'due )der 096214032 the highlundt N - unalrct, fthrhtghlundh-nadaru•10236udd r6/int. -4 5 /0. IS )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 75 of: INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SHEET 1 \ 1 in tM Out PM In PM Out Project: Location: Scenario: Ct. Date N/S Street: FJW Street: I\lusctnrnt nit l)cscriptiuti _ :' F a.tt,''t,tid Right Site Drivetieay N1`estbound Right Lett CR-7 Northbound Right Left ('R-7 Southbound Ruth( - 1 hrough I hiuutth Through Chrouth 2018 Traffic ('aunt 4 ount Balancing 201$ Existing Traffic 4;rowth Factor 10.03 per war) 2023 Background Growth 2023 Background l raffle Project Traffic Percent Assignment Inbound Inbound Project Traffic Percent Assignment Outbound t ►utbound Project Traffic Total Project Traffic 0 0 0 0 (1 0 1) 0 0 0 t) 0 0 0 t) 5(r 0 0 0 0 0 155 I) 0 0 0.159 0 0.159 0 0.159 0 0.159 0 0.159 0 0.159 0 0.159 :: 0.159 0 0.159 i) 0.159 155 0.159 0 0.159 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0 u 0 0 '1% 8 58 25% 0 0 75% 0 0 0% 25 160 0% 0 O 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% n 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 2023 Buildout 1 utai : i Percent Impact (Approach) 1.4 , The Highlands Mead, CO Short -Term Horizon Balanced with ('R-7 at ('R-36 lntercection i'14 7 Site Driveway - AM PEAK HOUR 0.92 0.92 Net Ne►N Trips: 441 121 1 137 1 80 Annual Growth Rate: 3.0% Growth Factor: 0.159274 0.92 0.92 Existing 1 ear: Ruildout Year: 0.92 0.92 2018 2023 Overall Percent 1 !t, ,.t t I'\1 I't. \I• !WI it \tin cinent Pill 0.92 0.92 Description 1 .„th,,uctd 1 .:tit jrmc�,i: % estbound Right Lett CR-7 Northbound R: At I ! ctt CR-7 Southbound Ir:.,i• . _._ -. _... through through Through 20(8 Traffic (ount 0 0 0 0 0 0 t) 0 0 4.-ount Balancing 0 0 t) I) 182 (i .0 94 ii 2018 Existing Traffic I 0 0 0 182 i) 0 94 0 t irowth Factor 10 03 per year) i 139 0.159 0 159 0b9 0_159 u i 3') 0 159 0 159 0.i - ' 2023 Background Growth 0 0 0 ?4 0 0 15 0 _2023 Background I rafftc 0 0 0 "211 0 109 0 Project Traffic Percent Assignment Inbound 0% (P . 0% 25% 75% 0% 0% 0% Inbound Project Traffic 0 1) 0 34 103 0 0 i! 1'crcent Assignment Outbound t 75° 00o )% 0% ,"0 25% 0% xuthound Project Tragic 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 l'otal Project Traffic a! 0 0 0 34 tu3 0 20 0 2023 Buitdout Total 6t} 0 ,.i 0 :45 03 129 0 Percent Impact (Approach) 100.0% lei t' ••••; ;° Overall Percent Impact k due Nest 096'14032 the high/antis'r4 - analysis f hehighlands-tiadaea-20?3hurldxlsfinr. a5 )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 76 of: INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SHEET AM In AM Out PM In PM Out Project: Location: Scenario: Ct. Date N/S Street: F./W Street: The Highlands Mead. CO Short-term Horizon Balanced with ('R-7 at CR-36 Inttur.cctiun Site Drivers a, C R-36 Nlosement PIIF AM PEAK HOUR 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Net New Trips: Annual Growth Rate: Growth Factor: 0.92 41) 121 T 13? 80 3.0% 0.159274 0.92 Existing Year:I 2018 Buildout Year: 202? Description _t. CR-36 Eastbound Right Lett CR-36 Westbound Right Lett Site Driveway Northbo.n4 RIO : I .Pt Southbound R.f,";'. Through Through throuj i Through .2018 Traffic Count 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 () 0 0 it aunt Balancing 0 15 0 +) 92 0 i 0 0 0 0 0 2018 Existing Traffic 0 15 0 f J 92 0 0 0 0 0 0 (,rowth Factor 10.03 per vtiar1 0.159 0.159 0.159 0.159 0.159 0.159 0.159 0.159 0.159 0.159 0.159 2023 Background Growth 0 2 0 0 I5 0 0 0 0 p` 0 0 2023 Background Traffic 0 17 o 0 107 0 0 is 0 0 0 Project Traffic Percent Assignment Inbound 0% 25% i 0% 0% 0% 0% )}E,: u ' 0% 0% Inbound Project Traffic 0 !in 0 u 0 0 0 n 0 0 Percent Assignment Outbound 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 25% 0% 00 Outbound Project Traffic 0 0 0 30 0 0 Total Project Traffic 0 0 30 0 0 ! 2023 Buildout Total 107 0 30 0 0 , ! Percent Impact )Approach) 0.0% 100.0% Os trail Percent lmpatt I'l(Ps anent Pill. Description Lett CR-36 Eastbound RI•ah! Lett CR-36 Westbound R:_ht I eft Site Drivers Northbound Right 1. ett Southbound Right Ihroi, : Through Ihrougfi through 2018 Traffic Count Count Balancing 2018 Existing Traffic Growth Factor (0.03 per year) 2023 Background Growth 2023 Background traffic Project Traffic Percent Assignment Inbound inbound Project Traffic Percent Assignment Outbound Outbound Project Traffic Total Project Traffic 2023 Buildout Total Percent Impact (Appioach) 0 0 0 0 u 0 u 0 • i 0 ti 0 0 u u 6 0 0 0 9 0 0 0.159 46 0.159 0 0.15') 0 0.159 54 0 159 0 a 1)9 0.1.• • 7;9 0 0.159 0 0.159 0 0.159 0 0 0 0% 14 100 0% 0 0 25% 0 0 0 , 9 0; 0% 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0 0°, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0% 34 0% << 0% 0 0% Ou0 0 0 0% 0 uw„ 0% 0% 0 u 0 E) 0 34 0 0 0 0 ,, ?11 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 K7 ; i , 63 0 _ 0 0 d ') _ 25 400 _ 0.0% 100 0°, - 0.92 PM PEAK HOUR 0.92 0.92 0.92 (serail Percent Impact 24.9 k dar ides 09621-1032 the ltt.gliland.s'N - anul►sis'frhehighlands-iiadata-20'3htuld xis/ins 46 )ut: blank 6/29/2( Page 77 of Ap Is e,dix Intl. reaction Sprea • sheets 2040 H ti• r z n Year nrt blank 6/29/2( Page 78 of INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SHEET AM In :AM Out PM In PM Out Project: Location: Scenario: Ct. Date N/S Street: FJW Street: Movement PHI The Highlands Mead, CO Short -Term Horizon 4/3/2018 1-25 NB Ramps CR-34 (Welker Avenue) AM PEAK HOUR 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Net New Trips: Annual Growth Rate: Growth Factor 0.92 032 -t() 121 1 117 go I 3.0% 0.916103 0.916103 0.92 Existing fear: Buildout Year: 2018 2040 Ih"cription CR-34(Welker i eft Avenue) Eastbound Right i CR-34 Leta (Welker Avenue) N estbound Right Left 1-25 NB Ramps Northbound, Right Lett 1-25 NB Ramps Southbound Knit)! fhrouxh through Through I-hrough 201$ Traffic Count ;2 136 0 0 255 3a (02 2 76 0 0 Count Balancing fit 0 0 :1 0 0 0 II U 0 2018 Existing Traffic 136 0 > 2 5 5 ► m 2 0 0 0 Growth Factor 10.03 per wear) 0.916 0.916 0.916 0.9. I 0.916 0.916 0.916 0.916 0 2040 Background Growth _ ' 125 0 234 33 2 70 0 0 0 2040 Background Traffic 261 U 4 14r, U 0 0 Project Traffic Percent Assignment Inbound 0% 00. t)° -, 0% ! ? 0% 0% Inbound Project traffic I n a O ;; Percent Assignment Outbound ;;00 : ° a 0% {,.. 0% Outbound Project traffic 42 6 0 I D 0 Total Project traffic 12 6 u _ 0 2040 Buildout Total 103 267 491 6 • _ ;. 0 t, B Percent impact (Approach) 13.0°0 0.4% Overall Percent Impact \lin ur�ru Pli( 5.4°•0 I' ' 1 PEAK HOUR 0.92 092 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Itt.<ril,tiatr, CR-34 Lett (Welker Avenue) Eastbound Right CR-34 1 d (Welker Avenue) 1'1 estbound R:_!'1 Len 1-25 NB Ramps Northbound Right Left 1-25 NB Ramps Southbound Right Through through through Through 2 018 Traffic Count 10 97 0 ) 127 105 61 I 8' 0 0 0 Count Balancing tl 0 0 t► 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2018 Existing Traffic 1 97 0 in: 61 1 R= 0 0 0 ( growth Factor (0.03 per year) ; 916 0.916 0.916 0.916 0.916 0-916 0 916 11 916 a 91O 0.916 0-916 0 916 2040 Background Growth 18 89 0 0 116 99, 56 I 75 0 0 0 2040 Background Traffic 38 186 u 243 201 II' 2 157 0 0 1) Project Traffic Percent Assignment Inbound 0)% 0% (Wa 0% 5% 0% 50°° 0% 00,, inbound Project Traffic 0 0 O 0 7 0 t.Sa 0 Percent Assignment Outbound :;(,.0 0% 0% 0% 0° :• ()fro Ott' Outbound Project Traffic _- 4 O 0 u 0 0 () Total Project Traffic 4 R, 7 O 69 0 U, 2040 Buildout Total 190 0 2.50 ?01 ' 15 , Percent Impact (Approach) it io _ 0 14a. ':0 (?° Overall Percent Impact k. 'tear /dev'09621403'the hi hland% r4 - analysts fthehtghlands-tiadata-'040hruld.x/s/in:. 41 )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 79 of INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SHEET A%1 In kM Out P\1 In 1'\1 Out Project: Location: Scenario: Ct. Date N/S Street: FJW Street: I1fovetnrtit P111 CR-34 (Welker Avenue) Eastboasd CR-34 (Welker Avenue) N esthound 1-25 SH Ramps Northbound I-25 SB Ramps %uuthbound Ue.:rtl,tion Left through Rrg)u '. ,:ti Ilit <<ut.h Rtgla I ..-. Through Right I ,'t Ihik.uth Right 2018 Traffic Count 85 141 ! 'it I'M; II 0 0 � _ 3 30 Count Balancing 0 0 0 i t. 0 0 0 0 2018 Existing traffic 85 111 1'Q r, i 0 0 4 ;n Growth Factor (0.03 per year) 0.916 U.916 „ t, I t, 0 916 0.916 r..1.91() 0 916 0.916 0.916 0.916 0.916 2040 Background Growth '8 129 ! 64 163 r) 0 0 0 75 4 1.-- 2 svii) Background Traffic 270 343 341 u i) 8 57 Project Traffic Percent Assignment Inbound It" . W.., 0% 55% 0% 0% 35% Inbound Project Traffic 1 0 0 22 0 I 0 t t Percent Assignment Outbound 40% 50% 0% 0% 0! c' s ' no no., Outbound Project Traffic tR 61 0 0 0 Total Project Traffic 48 6I 0 22 U t) p 2048 Buildout total _ 33 i 343 363 0 j -.I ': cent Impact I Approach) 3 I% _ x. I% I lit IliOhlands \lcad. ('0 't►ort-Terra Horizon 43/2018 1-25 %II Ramps C R-34 ( \\ Felker Avenue) AM PEAK HOUR 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Net New Trips: Annual Growth Rate: Growth Factor: 40 - l_'i I I r 80 I3.0°,0 0.916103 Existing )!'ear: Buildout Year: 0.92 0.92 I 018 2040 0.92 O trail Percent I \Iin,cult•ttt Pill PM PEAK HOUR 0_02 0.92 0.92 9.92 6.92 9.92 I);"riptinn L R-34 Left ( to Aker A%enuc E*stbound ► Right CR-34 Lett t Welker Avenue) Westbound :t 1-25 SB Ramps Northbound knit _. 1-25 SB Ramp:, Southbound Right I hiou h through Right Through I hiuuth 2018 Traffic Count Count Balancmg 2018 Existing Traffic ( rrowth Factor I0 03 per year) 2040 Background Growth 2040 Background Traffic Project Traffic Percent Assignment Inbound Inbound Protect Traffic Percent Assignment Outbound outbound Project traffic 1 otal Project traffic 2940 Kuildout Total Pettent Impact t Apo; a..It) I 113 0 76 0 36 `t 1 a 3 0 0 U 0 0 1) 0 I 1 41 0 .1 0 916 111 0.91 n 'IL, +, ) ! t, 0.9 k 143 0.916 0 0.916 !;0 (1916 0 0.916 I - I r, 4 t 0.916 104 -I I 33 .." 131 274 ;rig , 0 u 001, (1% 0 0 00/0 0 0 0% _ _ 0% 38 35% 0% n 0°c 0 t 0 0% 0 0% 0% 0 0% is 0% _ .:4 0 U 0 0 46 L49 186 69 127 _ 6°, Ch er;i11 Percent lntha, t 18 S A due 1dew'.096214032 the highlands r.r - anah-.us'.f hehrghlands-tiadatu-20l0bu11d.xls/int. M? )Ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 80 of INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SHEET Project: Location: Scenario: Ct. Date N/S Street: E/W Street: The Highlands Mead, CO Shod -Term Horizon 4/3/2018 C'R-7 (3rd Street) C'R-34 (Welker Avenue) Movement PM' 0.92 0.92 0.92 AM PEAK HOUR 0.92 0.92 0.92 Net New Trips: Annual Growth Rate: Growth Factor: 0.92 0.92 AM In AM out PM In PM Out ?. + 121 137 I 80 I 3.0% 0.916103 0.92 Existing Year: Buildout Year: 0.92 0.92 2018 2040 0.92 Description CR-34 (Welker Avenue) astlw nd Left through Rw►,i CR-34 , eft (Welker Avenue) Westbound Right Lett CR-7 (3rd Street) Northbound R ,_1 ('R-' t 3rd Street) k►uthbound Right fhiough I hiou,h 1 hroutth 2018 Traffic Count 17 133 45 18 152 39 77 Li , 79 In Count Balancing 0 0 0 I1 0 0 0 +, U 0 2018 Existing Traffic 17 i 33 4; 152 19 4 79 32 Growth Factor 10.03 per year) 0.916 0.916 0.916 0.916 0.916 a Y i r, 0916 0.916 0 916 0.916 2040 Background Growth 16 122 41 139 36 tI 5 29 2040 Background hraffit 33 ,;: $6 ',: 10 , , lit 61 Project Traffic Percent Assignment Inbound 90°,1 -00 0° < , ° Inbound Project Traffic - ;,, n n Percent Assignment Outbound 0°0 0° ., 0° •. Outbound Project Traffic 1 0 0 0 Total Project Traffic _ _ 0 2040 Buildout I utal 291 I 11 148 6 10 Percent Impact (Approach) - 8.3% 0.9° (herall Percent Impact Movement PDF' PM PEAK HOt R 0.`t? 0.92 0.92 0.92 0,92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Description t.ett R-34 (Welker Avenue) Eastbound Right CR-34 Lett (Welker Avenue) VI estbound R,llht. Lett CR-7 (3rd Street) Northbound Right Left CR-7 (3rd Street) Southbound Right 1 hrough I hrough I hrou;h through 2018 Traffic Count Count Balancing 2018 Existing Traftic Growth Factor 10.03 per year) 2040 Background Growth 2040 Background I rattic Project Traffic Percent Assignment Inbound Inbound Project Traffic Percent Assignment Outbound Outbound Project Traffic Total Project Traffic 2040 Buildout Total Percent Impact (Approach) ;5 O 105 0 �5 " 10 0 83 0 88 ii 65 0 108 0 23 0 +.r► u 6a u t5 u 0.916 105 0.916 55 0.916 ;►► 0.916 83 0.916 RS U.916 65 O916 108 0.916 23 0.916 60 0.916 69 0.916 35 0.916 32 96 201 0% 50 105 0% 9 19 0% 76 159 0% 81 169 90°6 60 99 207 5°,, 21 44 0°o 55 115 0% 63 132 0% 32 67 0% 0 I 0 0% 1 0 0% _ 0°0 7 0°<, 0 0% 0 0 5% 0 ...N% 7 0 i 0 0 0 ► _ 0 0 4 4 74 _ I s.-, 159 292 _ _ _ _'6.2% _ (herall Percent Impact 13.3° <. k dra- Ides 1)96'11032 the highlands •t4 - ana1ysis'<Jthehrghlands-iiadata-?O40burld.xlsJint. 03 5/1O/18 )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 81 of: INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SHEET AM In AM Out PM In PM Out Project: Location: Scenario: Ct. Date N/S Street: E/W Street: The Highlands Mead, CO Short -Term Horizon 4/3/2018 (11-7 C R-36 !Movement PIiF Description Lett CR-36, F;Astbound Ki :ht 1.c ti CR-36 Westbound K*.iht CR-7 \ortbbount4 KtJit [ Ott CR-7 Southbound RiLuit [hiough [hiough Through I hiough 2018 Traffic Count I I 76 x x 36 1; 1 77 Count Balancing 0 0 (1 0 N 0 U 0 0 u 2018 Existing Traffic 1 _ 76 8 :6 11 77 Growth Factor (0.03 per year) t t 916 0016 0'116 0.916 0 916 0.916 0 916 x)_916 0916 0.916 0.916 0.916 2040 Background Growth 70 7 I_2 1 71 2040 Background Traffic 146 1:, 15 - _ _ t, Project Traffic Percent Assignment Inbound 0% 0% 0% _ 0% 0% Web Intwuixi Project Traffic 0 n 0 I 0 0 0 Percent Assignment Outbound 0% 0% 0% _ 0% 0% 0% Outbound Proiect Traffic I. 0 1) 0 0 0 Total Project Traffic I�t, It U 0 2040 Buildout 1'i>tA1 _ 2 4 I'6 1 f i ' •,9 _ 148 6 Percent Impact (Approach) 0.0% 146"ti 93 a 0.0% Overall Percent 1ill Fyn i AM PEAK 1101 R 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 u.`1' Net Ness ('rifts: Annual Growth Rate: Growth Factor: 9.92 0.92 40 121 I3at 80 .0% 0.916103 0.92 Existing ti ear:I 2018 Huildout Year: 2040 0.92 0.92 0.92 ilo+rmcnt PIIF Description ! _ t' CR-36 Eastbound Right Lett C R- 36 Westbound Right _ . _ CR-7 Northbound Right Lett CR-7 Southbound Klein I hrout Through I luuu_; h through 2018 -Traffic Count 3 7 1 _ I I I _ [UF -', 6 51 1 Count Ralancinz 0 0 i i 0 0 0 0 (1 0 2018 Existing Traffic 7 _ I I I _ 107 73 h I growth Factor 40.03 per year) 0.916 0.916 01.916 0.916 0.916 916 0.916 0.916 a 916 0.916 2040 Background Growth 6 1 38 I 10 48 67 47 1 2040 Background Traffic 13 80 2 21 205 140 ys ' Project Traffic Percent Assignment Inbound 0% 0% 0% 0! 6 , ,. 25% no, 0°0 Inbound Project Traffic n 0 0 n n '.1 0 Percent Assignment Outbound 0"0 0% 0% _ Outbound Project Traffic 1) 0 t Total Project Traffic U _ U 2040 Ruildout Total o 13 i UU 2 Percent .mpact kApptoat. h) 0.0% 163°0 Overall Percent Impact 0.92 0.92 0.92 u. ` 1'\1 1'I. K. 1101 R 0.92 II o.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 8.5% ,hir I.Iei. 09621403,2 the hrghlunds , r4 - anal.sis f►hehigh/ands-tiadaia-2040build.xtc f int. #4 )ut: blank 6'Y -,( Page 82 of: INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SHEET AM In AM Out PM In PM Out Project: Location: Scenario: Ct. Date N/S Street: E/W Street: (Movement Ptif• I h.criptiun . ,.21; Eastbound Right '. -', Site Driveihat H estbound Right tell CR-' Northb untl Rt' lht Len CR-7 Southbound RI II-:: through Through -through Through 2018 Traffic Count +) 0 0 !) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Count Balancing 0 0 9 0 u 0 I 0 50 0 0 155 0 2018 Existing traffic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 0 0 155 0 Growth Factor 10.03 per year) 0.916 0.916 0.916 0.916 0.916 0.916 0.916 0.916 0.916 d?.916 0.916 0.916 2040 Background Growth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 0 0 142 0 2040 Background I'raftil U U 0 0 0 U `in 0 297 0 Project Traffic Percent Assignment Inbound u •• d r 0% 0% 0% 25% 75% 0% o +►°•o Inbound Project Traffic , d + 0 0 0 1 n uo 0 0 Percent Assignment Outbound ;1 „ ©% 0% 0% 0% 0°o _ Outbound Project Traffic d> i, ; H 0 0 0 0 Total Project Traffic „ > I 0 0 0 10 Std Buildout Total ..2040 ° H ; 91 0 0 106 30 Percent Impact (Approach) 29.4` • The Highlands Mead, CO Short -Term Horizon Balanced with CR-7 at ('R-36 Intersection ('R-7 Site Driveway I't. xis 110l 0.92 0.92 Net New Trips: 40 _ 121 1 137 80 Annual Growth Rate: 3.0% Growth Factor: 0.91610 0.92 0.92 Existing Year: Buildout Year: 0.92 0.92 2018 2040 I Overall Percent Imp.'. Movement PIIF I\1 1) I. ih HOUR 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Description _ _ ; I .:, N i lyre a ❑d _ Lett Sue Driveway % estbound Right Lett CR-' Nortbbsund Right I di c k- - Southbound Right : r .• _:. Through I hrough I hrough 2018 Traffic Count 0 0 0 0 t) 1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 taunt Balancing 0 0 0 !) 0 u 0 182 0 0 94 0 2018 Existing Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 182 0 0 94 0 ( rrowth Factor 10 03 per year ! i.916 0 916 0.916 0.9 i b U.91 b 0 910 0 916 0.916 0.916 0.916 0.916 0.916 2040 Background Growth ` 0 0 9 0 0 0 167 0 0 86 0 2040 Background Traffic 0 0 ) 0 0 0 349 0 0 180 0 Project Traffic Percent Assignment Inbound i)° ° 0% 0% 00 a 0% 0% 25% 75° s 0% (1% 0% Inbound Protect Traffic ;t 0 i 0 0 0 0 34 103 0 0 0 Percent Assignment Outbound u% 0% ; °•o 0°0 t)" U" 0 0% 0! . w Outbound Project Traffic ti 0 f 60 0 i) U 0 0 _ 0 Total Project Traffic I i .I 1u3 2040 Buildout Total H 0 103 _ Percent Impact (Approach) - _ 1040° _ Overall Percent Impact A. *slur lclen 096214032 the Iughlands'14 - analysis/rhehrghlands-riadatu-?040hudd.xlsfont. 45 5/10/18 )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 83 of INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SHEET AM In AM Out PSI In PM Out Project: Location: Scenario: Ct. Date N/S Street: E/W Street: 1esement PHI The Highlands Mead, t'O Short -Terns Horiion Balanced with ( R-7 at ('R-36 Intersection Site Di-h'os ar (R-36 A►1 PE.AK 1101 R 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Net New Trips: %nnual Growth Rate: Growth Factor: 0.92 40 121 13? 80 3.0°0 0.916103 0.92 Existing Year: Ruildout Year: '040 Description I. Ott t^R- ,6 :astbuun ►splits I alt CR-36 Westbound Ruaht Left Site Driveway Nor t_ _'•° Southbound } t�,t & I hrtiut.) Ihrou&h Through RIX{tlt ht,'u°_t! 2018 Traffic Count 0 n 1 I) 0 u 0 0 0 O a 0 Count balancing U I ! ; 92 U 0 0 0 t) (1 0 2018 Existing Traffic 0 15 9 0 92 0 0 0 n 0 0 0 Growth Factor (0.03 per year) 0.916 0.916 0.916 0.91 6 0 916 0.916 0.916 0.916 0.91b 0.916 0.916 0.916 2040 Background Growth 0 14 0 0 S4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2040 Background Traffic 0 29 ) t i t - r, t) 0 t f 0 () Project Traffic Percent Assignment Inbound 0% 0% '51).0 0° o 0° , 0° o oft, I r' ,. (Y:, 0°4 Inbound Project Traffic 0 0 10 0 0 0 t) i i Percent Assignment Outbound 0% 0% 0% 0% a (r' , l io ., _ ° ; ! v Outbound Project Traffic 0 0 0 0 I) 0 10 ,, Total Project Traffic 0 r) I n U U o ;t; U 2040 Buildout total '! 29 10 0 176 0 :t► 0 0 Percent Impact t 1.i>pt..aLii '5 6% 0.0°i° 100.0% ()serail Percent Impact Min PHI PM PLAK 1101 R 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 10.92 Description Lett t:R-3h Eastbound Right Hatt t:R-tf, N rstbound Right Lets Site Un two!, Northboun • Right Lett Southbound Right I hroush through l hrou,h I hrvuah 2018 Traffic t punt 0 0 0 0 U I) I) U O 0 ++ Count Balancing 0 86 U 0 54 ti U 0 v 2018 Existing [raffle t! 86 0 0 54 0 0 0 0 O ( irou th Factor :0 03 pet tat i 0916 0.916 0.916 0 t) i r, 0.910 0 916 0.916 0.916 11.91b 1) 916 (i 916 2040 Background (.ronth 0 79 0 0 49 0 0 0 0 0 '' 2040 Background Traf is 0 165 0 0 103 0 0 0 0 0 Project Traffic Percent Assignment Inbound g'„ 0% lc°.. 0% 9% 0% 0% 0% 0°0 Inbound Project traffic U U 0 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Assignment Outbound )`' c, 0% 0°0 0•/0 00. 0°4 `_ o42., !r", t hitbouad Project Traffic 0 0 0 0 i► () '0 ('t r 1 Total Project Traffic u 0 .34 0 u o 'r t 0 0 0 t;, 2040 Buildout Total 0 165 14 0 103 0 '0 a 0 O 0 it Percent Impact t Appnoak: h) 17 1% 0.0°o i (n► u°!. - Oswalt Percent Impact 16.8% k. ddur ldev'09621403 2 the highlands std - anal; cis fthehighlands-riadata-?040build.xI3/inr 46 nut:blank 6/29/2( Page 84 of Appendix E: Synchro SimTraffic Output: Existing (2018) )ut:blank 6/2912( The Highlands 1:1-25 NB Ramps & CR-34 Page 85 of Existing AM 05/07/2018 -4* c Ak" 4\ t /I* 41 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 I 4., Traffic Volume (vph) 32 136 0 0 255 36 102 2 76 0 0 0 Future Volume (vph) 32 136 0 0 255 36 102 2 76 0 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 100 100 100 100 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1846 0 0 1827 0 0 1715 0 0 0 0 Flt Permitted 0.991 0 971 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1846 0 0 1827 0 0 1715 0 0 0 0 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 566 555 682 710 Travel Time (s) 86 84 155 16.1 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.80 0.77 0.92 0.92 0.81 0.69 0.46 0.50 0.53 0.92 0.92 0.92 Growth Factor 100% 100% 103% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (96) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O/0 0% Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 217 0 0 367 0 0 369 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 44.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 K:1DUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands'T4 - Analysis\Synchro‘ExistingAM.syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report nut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 1: 1-25 NB Ramps & CR-34 Page 86 of Existing AM 05/07/2018 Intersection fret Delay spieh 9.5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR R NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, vehlh 32 Future Vol, veh/h 32 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Free RT Channelized Storage Lengt Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 Grade, % - 0 Peak Hour Factor 80 77 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 Mvmt Flaw 40 177 4 1 136 0 Free 0 0 Free None 0 0 0 Free 1¢ 255 255 0 Free 102 36 102 0 0 Free Stop None - 2 0 Stop 76 0 0 76 0 0 0 0 0 Stop Stop Stop None - - 0 0 0 Stop None h Major/Minor Major"' 92 2 0 0 - 0 92 81 69 46 2 2 2 2 0 315 52 222 Major2 Minorl 0 0 50 53 2 2 4 143 92 2 0 0 92 2 0 92 2 0 Conflicting Flow All 367 0 Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1192 Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1192 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 HCM Control Delay s LOS S 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 598 - 257 - 341 - 6.42 - 5.42 - 5.42 - 3.518 - 465 - 786 - 720 - 448 - 448 - 757 720 624 177 257 367 - 6.52 6.22 5.52 - 5.52 - 4.018 3.318 402 866 695 - 622 0 866 0 0 0 Minor Lane/Major Wan NBLn1 EBL EBT WBT 1►^rBR Capacity (vehlh) HCM HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile O(veh) 119 Lane V/C Ratio ,6 0.1 K:\DUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\ExistingAM.syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 2:1-25 SB Ramps & CR-34 Page 87 of Existing AM 05/07/2018 -410 t •, Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations I, 4 Traffic Volume (vph) 0 85 141 179 178 0 0 0 ; 8`t r) Future Volume (vph) 0 85 141 179 178 0 0 0 -1 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 1: 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% n - (I,-, Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 100 100 100 1c0 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1708 0 0 1824 0 0 0 0 0 1745 0 Fit Permitted 0.979 0 965 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1708 0 0 1824 0 0 0 0 0 1745 0 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 ' 0 Link Distance (ft) 771 566 608 809 Travel Time (s) 11.7 8.6 13.8 18.4 Confl. Peds. (#!hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.69 0.72 0.76 0.56 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.76 0.50 0.94 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 319 0 0 554 0 0 0 0 0 148 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Intersection Summary "1 Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 49.0% Analysis Period (min) 15 ICU Level of Service A K:!DUR_LDEV1O96214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\SynchrolExistingAM.syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut: blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 2: 1-25 SB Ramps & CR-34 Page 88 of Existing AM 05/07/2018 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 7.8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT 4WJBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 85 141 17c 178 0 0 0 0 82 4 30 Future Vol, veh/h 0 85 141 179 178 0 0 0 0 82 4 30 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control RT Channelized Storage Length 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop - None - - None Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow - 0 92 69 72 2 2 2 0 123 196 - None - - None 0 0 - 0 - - 0 - - 76 56 92 92 92 92 76 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 236 318 0 0 0 0 108 0 50 2 8 94 2 32 Major/Minor._ Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 319 1010 1108 318 Stage 1 789 789 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Sty 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 0 Stage 1 0 OP - 412 - 2.218 - 1241 0 0 221 319 - 6.42 6.52 6.22 5.42 5.52 - 5.42 5.52 - 3.518 4.018 3.318 266 210 723 448 402 Stage 2 0 0 816 653 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - 1241 205 0 723 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 205 Stage 1 345 0 Stage 2 810 0 Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay s 0 37 39 HCM LOS r Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EST EBR WBL WBT SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) - 1241 - 245 HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay Cs) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) J h - 0.7 - 0.603 0 39.8 E 3.5 K:\DUR_LDEV\096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchio\ExistingAM.syn Kirnley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 3: 3rd St. (CR-7) & Welker Ave. (CR-34) Page 89 of Existing AM 05/07/2018 4-- k` t Lane Grou4: EBL EBT EBR V'AIL WBT WBR NBA NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4* 4 r 44 4* Traffic Volume (vph) 17 133 45 18 152 39 77 34 5 76 79 32 Future Volume (vph) 17 133 45 18 152 39 77 34 5 76 79 32 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 150 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 100 100 100 100 Said. Flow @rof) 0 1805 0 0 1853 1583 0 1790 0 0 1774 0 Fit Permitted 0.995 0.995 0.967 0.982 Said. Flow (perm) 0 1805 0 0 1853 1583 0 1790 0 0 1174 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 35 25 Link Distance (ft) 894 990 624 646 Travel Time (s) 24.4 27 0 12.2 17.6 Cont Peds. (It/hr) 1 1 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Growth Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) Bus Blockages (#/hr) Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 338 0 0 304 56 0 193 0 0 256 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop 0.53 0.55 0.70 0.64 0.55 0.70 0.58 0.65 0.63 0.79 0.76 0.57 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type. Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 40.5% Analysis Period (min) 15 ICU Level of Service A K DUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\SynchroiExistingAM.syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report nut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 3: 3rd St. (CR-i) & Welker Ave. (CR-34) Page 90 of Existing AM 05/07/2018 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 16.2 Intersection LOS Movement C EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL j BT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations r Traffic Vol, veh/h 17 133 45 18 152 39 77 34 5 76 79 32 Future Vol, veh/h 17 133 45 18 152 39 77 34 5 76 79 32 Peak Hour Factor 0.5 3 0.55 0.10 0.64 0 55 0.70 0.58 0.65 0.63 0.79 0.76 0.57 Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow Number of Lanes 0 2 2 242 64 1 0 2 L i 2 276 0 2 2 56 133 1 0 2 2 2 2 2 52 8 96 104 56 1 0 0 1 0 EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach Opposing Lanes Conflicting Approach Left Conflicting Lanes Left Conflicting Approach Right Conflicting Lanes Right HCM Control Delay HCM LOS 1 NB 1 17.7 C EB 1 NB 1 SB 1 16.8 C SB 1 EB 1 WB 2 13.9 B NB 1 WB 2 EB 1 15.3 C Lane NBLni EBLni WBLn1 WBLn2 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 66% 9% 14% 0% 41% Vol Thru, % 29% 68% 89% 0% 42% Vol Right, % Sign Control Traffic Vol by Lane LT Vol Through Vol RT Vol Lane Flow Rate 4% 23% 0% 100% 17% Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop 116 195 170 39 187 77 17 18 0 76 34 133 152 0 79 5 45 0 39 32 193 338 304 56 256 Geometry Gm Degree of Util (X) Departure Headway (Hd) Convergence, Y/N Cap Service Time HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th -tile O 2 5 7 7 2 0.368 6.867 Yes 523 4.928 0.369 13.9 B 1.7 0.584 6.222 Yes 578 4.275 0.585 17.7 C 37 0.571 6.755 Yes 533 4.508 0.57 18.2 C 3.5 0.093 5.986 Yes 597 3.738 0.094 9.4 A 0.3 0.468 6.57 Yes 546 4.626 0.469 15.3 C 2.5 K: 1DUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\ExistingAM.syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 4: CR-7 & CR-36 Page 91 of Existing AM 05/01/2018 4-- k. t it% \* Lane Group EBL EBT EBR MI. WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4. IPS 11 4 r 4 4. Traffic Volume (vph) 1 1 2 76 3 8 1 36 13 1 7 7 3 Future Volume (vph) 1 1 2 76 8 8 1 36 13 1 77 3 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 110 0 0 200 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 100 80 100 100 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1750 0 1770 1667 0 0 1855 1583 0 1844 0 Fit Permitted 0.984 0 950 0.996 0.998 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1750 0 1770 1667 0 0 1855 1583 0 1844 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 35 35 45 Link Distance (ft) 521 702 699 522 Travel Time (s) 14.2 13 7 13.6 7 9 Conti. Peds. (#/hr) Conti. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.25 0.25 0.50 0.83 0.67 0.29 0.25 0.69 0.54 0.25 0.66 0.38 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Shared La re Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 12 0 92 40 0 0 56 24 0 129 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 22.6% Analysis Period (min) 15 ICU Level of Service A K:1DUR_LDEV\096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\ExistingAM.syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report nut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 4: C R-7 & CR-36 Page 92 of Existing AM 05/07/2018 Intersection Int Delay s/yen Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT VVBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations +44 Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 1 2 76 8 8 1 1 11 3 Future Vol, veh/h 1 1 2 76 8 8 13 1 77 3 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 n U 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None Storage Length - - 110 - None 200 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - 0 c:1 r 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 25 25 50 83 67 29 25 69 54 25 66 38 Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 4 92 12 28 4 52 24 2 2 117 8 Major/Minor Mitor2 Minorl Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 209 189 121 19 } 193 52 125 0 0 52 0 0 Stage 1 129 129 60 60 • Stage 2 80 60 - 133 133 Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.2 2 4 12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 748 706 930 767 702 1016 1462 Stage 1 875 789 - 951 845 - 4.12 - 2.218 - 1554 Se Is Stage 2 929 845 - 870 786 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 715 702 930 757 698 1016 1462 - 1554 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 715 702 - 757 698 Stage 1 872 787 - 948 842 Stage 2 888 842 859 784 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 9.7 10 0.4 0.2 HCM LOS Minor Lane/Major Myatt NBL NBT NBREBLn1WBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/ h) 1462 - - 770 757 893 1554 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 - 0.016 0.121 0.044 0.003 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 0 - 9.7 10.4 9.2 7.3 HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) A 0 A B A A A 0 OA 0.1 0 K 1DUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - AnalysistSynchrolExistingAM.syn Kimley-Horn • Synchro 9 Report )ut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 1: I-25 NB Ramps & CR-34 Page 93 of Existing PM 05/07/2018 -4 - ;Lank-) Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL S#SWF Stir Lane Configurations +1 Is 4 Traffic Volume (vph) 20 97 ii 0 127 105 61 1 82 0 0 0 Future Volume (vph) 20 97 0 0 1:7 105 61 1 82 0 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 1 l 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 100 100 100 100 Said. Flow @rot) 0 1850 0 0 1751 0 0 1687 0 0 0 0 Flt Permitted 0.993 0 979 Said. Flow (perm) 0 1850 0 0 1751 0 0 1687 0 0 0 0 Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Growth Fac-or 45 566 8.6 45 555 8.4 30 682 15.5 30 710 16.1 0.83 0.66 0.92 0.92 0.86 0.88 0.69 0.25 0.71 0.92 0.92 0.92 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 171 0 0 267 0 0 207 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 37.4% Analysis Period (min) 15 ICU Level of Service A K:1DUR_LDEV\096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\SynchrotExistingPM.syn Kimley-Horr Synchro 9 Report )ut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 1:1-25 NB Ramps & CR-34 Page 94 of Existing PM 05/07/2018 Intersection int Delay slveh 4.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 20 p -I 44 0 0 127 105 61 1 82 0 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 20 97 0 0 127 105 61 1 82 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr Sign Control 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized • None - None - None - None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 83 66 92 92 86 88 69 25 71 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 L Mvmt Flow 24 147 2 2 2 L L 2 2 2 0 0 148 119 88 4 115 0 0 0 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minor] Conflicting Flow All 267 0 0 402 462 147 Stage 1 - 195 195 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1297 Stage 1 Stage 2 0 0 vio - 207 267 - - 6.42 6.52 6.22 - 5.42 5.52 - - 5.42 5.52 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 - 604 497 900 - 838 739 - 0 0 - 828 688 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1297 - 592 0 900 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 - 592 0 - 821 0 - 828 0 A Broach EB SUB HCM Control Delay, s 1.1 11.8 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLni EBL EBT WBT \ BR Capacity (veh/h) 734 129' HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile O(veh) 11 8 7 n, J K:\DUR_LDEV\096214032 The Higniands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\ExistingPM.syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 2: I-25 SB Ramps & CR-34 Page 95 of Existing PM 05/07/2018 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL tisiBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SB1_ SBT SBR Lane Configurations I 4 4, Traffic Volume (vph) 0 113 76 36 143 0 0 0 0 29 1 41 Future Volume (vph) 0 113 76 36 143 0 0 0 0 29 1 41 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 100 100 100 100 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1766 0 0 1844 0 0 0 0 0 1694 0 Flt Permitted 0.990 0.979 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1766 0 0 1844 0 0 0 0 0 1694 0 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 771 566 608 809 Travel Time (s) 11 7 18.4 Conti. Peds. (#/hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.81 0.86 0.82 0.85 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.81 0.25 0.93 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 228 0 0 212 0 0 0 0 0 84 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type. Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 34.3% Analysis Period (min) 15 8.6 13.8 ICU Level of Service A K:1DUR_LDEVt096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\SynchrotExistingPN1 syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report nut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 2: 1-25 SB Ramps & CR-34 Page 96 of Existing PM 05/07/2018 Intersection lnt Delay s`veh Movement 24 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR_ Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 113 7o 143 0 0 0 0 29 1 41 Future Vol, veh/h 0 113 143 0 0 0 0 29 1 41 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 Grade, % 0 Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop - None - - None vat 0 0 air 0 None - - None 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 81 86 82 85 92 92 92 92 81 25 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flaw 0 140 88 44 168 0 0 0 0 36 4 4 4 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 nor2 Conflicting Flow All 228 0 440 484 168 Stage 1 256 256 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 0 Stage 1 0 Stage 2 0 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 4.12 oak - 2.218 - 1340 - 1340 AM 0 0 0 184 228 6.42 6.52 6.22 5.42 5.52 5.42 5.52 - 3.518 4.018 3.318 574 483 876 787 696 848 715 553 0 876 553 0 Stage 1 - 759 0 Stage 2 848 0 HCM Control Delay, s 0 10.9 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Marnt EBT EBR \ BL WBT SBLn 1 Capacity (veh/h) - 1340 HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 78 1 K:\DUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\\Synchro\ExistingPM.syn Kimsey -Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 3: 3rd St. (CR-7) & Welker Ave. (CR-34) Page 97 of Existing PM 05/07/2018 SBL Lane Grout: EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 4 r 44 Traffic Volume (vph) 35 105 5 10 33 88 65 108 ? a 60 69 Future Volume (vph) 35 105 10 c 65 108 2 01 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 190c Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 1 1 12 1 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 150 0 0 U , l - Storage Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 e: Taper Length (ft) 100 100 100 100 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1768 0 0 1848 1583 0 1800 0 0 17560 Flt Permitted 0.991 0.992 0.982 0.981 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1768 0 0 1848 1583 0 1800 0 0 1756 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 35 25 Link Distance (ft) 894 990 624 646 Travel Time (s) 24.4 27.0 12.2 17.6 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.55 0.55 0.47 0.50 0.74 0.76 0.65 0.79 0.72 0.60 0.82 0.46 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Ou Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 372 0 0 132 116 0 269 0 0 260 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 37.6% Analysis Period (min) 15 ICU Level of Service A K:1DUR_LDEV!096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\SynchrolExistingPM.syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report nut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 3: 3rd St. (CR-7) & Welker Ave. (CR-34) Page 98 of Existing PM 05/07/2018 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 15.8 Int ersection LOS C Movement EBL EBT EBP WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations � Traffic Vol, veh/h 35 105 Future Vol, veh/h 35 105 Peak Hour Factor 0.55 0.55 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 Mvmt Flow 64 191 Number of Lanes 0 1 4 r 44 10 83 88 65 108 Z. 60 6Q 35 10 83 88 65 J be oci 35 0.50 0.74 0.76 0.65 079 0 72 0 60 0.82 0.46 L L 2 L 2 L 3 2 20 112 116 100 137 3? 100 84 76 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 Approach EB \/B NB SB Opposing Approach Opposing Lanes 2 Conflicting Approach Left SB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 HCM Control Delay 19 1 HCM LOS C 1 EP 1 WB L 15.4 C EB 1 15 B Lane NBLn1 EBLni WBLn1 WBLn2 SBLni Vol Left, % 33% 18% 11% 37% Vol Thru, % 55% 54% 89% 070 42% Vol Right, % Sign Control Traffic Vol by Lane 12% 28% 0% 100% 21% Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop 196 195 93 88 164 LT Vol 65 35 10 0 60 Through Vol RT Vol Lane Flow Rate 108 105 83 0 69 23 55 0 88 35 269 372 132 116 260 Geometry Grp 2 5 7 7 2 Degree of Util (X) Departure Headway (Hd) Convergence, Y/N Cap Service Time HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th -tile Q 0.481 0.635 0.259 0.202 0.464 6.448 6.155 7.046 6.275 6.422 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 559 587 509 570 560 4.504 4.206 4.805 4.033 4.478 0.481 0.634 0.259 0.204 0.464 15.4 19.4 12.3 10.6 15 C C B B B 2.6 4.5 1 0.7 2 4 K: 1DUR_LDEV1096214032 The HighlandstT4 - Analysis\SynchrolExistingPM.syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:hlank 6/29/2( The Highlands 4: CR-7 & CR-36 Page 99 of Existing PM 05/07/2018 .1/4%* c 4‘. t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR \i'VBL 'NBT 1, 'BR NBL NBT NBR SBL SB.T SBR Lane Configurations It 1 4 r 4, Traffic Volume (vph) 3 7 1 42 1 11 2 107 73 6 51 1 Future Volume (vph) 3 7 -. _ 1 . 2 107 73 6 51 1 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 100 0 0 200 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 100 80 100 100 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1794 0 1770 1639 0 0 1861 1583 0 1840 0 Flt Permitted 0.990 0.950 0.999 0.994 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1794 0 1770 1639 0 0 1861 1583 0 1840 0 Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Conti. Bikes (#/hr) 25 521 14.2 35 702 13.7 35 699 13.6 45 522 7.9 Peak Hour Factor 0.75 0.58 0.25 0.66 0.25 0.69 0.50 0.76 0.91 0.50 0.67 0.25 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 20 0 64 20 0 0 115 80 0 92 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free 0 intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 21.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 K:1DUR_LDEV\O96214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\ExistingPM.syn Kirnley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:hlank 6/29/2( The Highlands 4: CR-7 & CR-36 Page 100 of Existing PM 05/07/2018 Intersection Int Delay s/veh Movement 2.8 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 Future Vol, veh/h 3 +to 4 r 7 1 42 1 11 2 107 73 6 51 1 7 1 42 1 11 2 107 73 6 51 1 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None • - None • • None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # - Grade, % - 100 - 200 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 (1 0 Peak Hour Factor 75 58 25 66 25 69 50 76 91 50 67 25 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 Mvmt Flow 4 2 2 2 2 2 12 4 64 4 16 2 2 4 141 2 2 80 12 76 4 Major/Minor Minor2 Minorl N1ajor1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 261 251 78 259 253 141 80 141 n Stage 1 102 102 - 149 149 Stage 2 159 149 - 110 104 Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 692 652 983 694 650 907 1518 Stage 1 904 811 - 854 774 - Stage 2 843 774 - 895 809 - 2.218 - 1442 Platoon blocked, % OD Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 670 644 983 675 642 907 1518 - 1442 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 670 644 - 675 642 Stage 1 901 804 - 851 772 Stage 2 821 772 - 870 802 Approach ES WS NB HCM Control Delay, s 10.3 10.5 01 1 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1518 697 675 838 1442 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 HCM Control Delay (s) 7 4 HCM Lane LOS A HCM 95th %tile O(veh) 0 0.029 0.094 0.024 0.008 - 10.3 10.9 9.4 7.5 0 BB A A A 0.1 0.3 0.1 0 K:1DUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\SynchrotExistingPM.syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 101 of SimTraffic Performance Report Existing AM 05/08/2018 1: 1-25 NB Ramps & CR-34 Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB All Denied Del/Veh (s) Total DelNeh (s) 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.2 2.0 0.9 9.7 3.7 2: 1-25 SB Ramps & CR-34 Performance by approach roach EB WB SB All Denied DelNeh (s) Total Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.1 1.5 3.5 13.1 4.5 3: 3rd St. (CR-7) & Welker Ave. (CR-34) Performance by approach Denied DelNeh (s) Total DelNeh (s) 0.2 0.8 02 0.2 0.4 6.7 6.2 6.9 6.0 6.4 4: CR-7 & CR-36 Performance by approach l3 WB SB Denied DelNeh (s) Total DelNeh (s) 0.1 3.3 1 2 0.2 1.7 5.7 4.8 0.1 0.8 2.4 Total Network Performance Denied DelNeh (s) Total DelNeh (s) 0.5 6.8 The Highlands Kimley-Horn SimTraffic Report Page 1 )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 102 of SimTraffic Performance Report Existing AM 05/08/2018 1: 1-25 NB Ramps & CR-34 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) Total DelNeh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.2 2.7 1.9 1.0 0.2 11.0 17.0 7.5 3.7 2: 1-25 SB Ramps & CR-34 Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT SBL SBT SBR All Denied DelNeh (s) _ 0.3 0.2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0.1 0.2 0.1 Total DelNeh (s) 2.7 0.9 3.4 3 7 14 4 23.1 8.5 4.5 3: 3rd St. (CR-7) & Welker Ave. (CR-34) Performance by movement Movement Denied DelNeh (s) Total DelNeh (s) EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 3.2 0.2 0.2 6.4 7.4 4.6 6.3 6.9 3.4 6.3 8.3 A.? 9 65 46 3: 3rd St. (CR-7) & Welker Ave. (CR-34) Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.4 Total DelNeh (s) 6.4 4: CR-7 & CR-36 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR \/BL '1"',NBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied DelNeh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.1 4.0 0.4 nl Total DelNeh (s) 5.9 7.3 3.9 4.9 7.1 2.4 1.1 01 00 09 4i0 4: CR-7 & CR-36 Performance by movement Movement All Denied DelNeh (s) 1.7 rota) DelNeh (s) 2.4 Total Network Performance Denied DelNeh (s) 0.5 Total DelNeh (s) 6.8 The Highlands Kimley-Horn SimTraffic Report Page 1 nut:blank 6/29/2( Page 103 of SimTraffic Performance Report Existing PM 05/08/2018 1: 1-25 NB Ramps & CR-34 Performance by approach Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.1 Total DelNeh (s) 1.4 1.0 5.1 2.3 2: 1-25 SB Ramps & CR-34 Performance by approach Approach EB WB SB All Denied DelNeh (s) 0.2 0.0 01 0.1 Total DelNeh (s) 0.8 1.7 4.3 1.7 3: 3rd St. (CR-7) & Welker Ave. (CR-34) Performance by approach 0.3 1.8 0.2 Denied DelNeh (s) Total DelNeh (s) 0.2 0.6 7.2 5.1 7.8 5.9 6.5 4: CR-7 & CR-36 Performance by approach mAspproach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 3.3 1 7 0 1 1 7 Total DelNeh (s) 5.6 4 3 0.2 0.8 1.2 Total Network Performance Denied DelNeh (s) 0.6 Total DelNeh (s) 5.0 The Highlands Kimley-Horn SimTraffic Report Page 1 )ut: blank 6/29/2( Page 104 of SimTraffic Performance Report Existing PM 05/08/2018 1: 1-25 NB Ramps & CR-34 Performance by movement Movement EBL FBI WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR All Denied DelNeh (s) Total DelNeh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0 1 0.2 0.1 1.9 1.3 1.6 0.4 6.4 7.1 3.9 2.3 2: 1-25 SB Ramps & CR-34 Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT SBL SBT SBR All Denied DelNeh (s) 0.2 0 0 n 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 1.1 0.4 2.3 1.6 5.8 6.1 3.1 1.7 3: 3rd St. (CR-7) & Welker Ave. (CR-34) Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT I\B .: Pn SIR . r SBT Denied DelNeh (s) Total DelNeh (s) 0 7 0 0.2 0.4 0.4 3.1 0.3 0.2 0 7.5 8.0 5.4 61 6.2 4.0 7.2 49 47 62 6.4 4.3 3: 3rd St. (CR-7) & Welker Ave. (CR-34) Performance by movement Denied DelNeh (s) 0.6 Total DelNeh (s) 6.5 4: CR-7 & CR-36 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied DelNeh (s) Total DelNeh (s) 0.1 0.1 4.1 0.1 0 1 0.3 0.3 4.8 5.9 4.8 9.2 1.8 1.4 0.2 4: CR-7 & CR-36 Performance by movement r 02 i;1 f: 0 2 1 2 0 8 0 0 r'lo°v`+ti All Denied DelNeh (s) 1.7 Total Del/Veh (s) 1.2 Total Network Performance Denied DelNeh (s) Total DelNeh (s) 0.6 5.0 The Highlands Kimley-Horn SimTraffic Report Page 1 nut:blank 6/29/2( Page 105 of kwiT 'appe dxF: ckgr sand (2023) 6/29/2( The Highlands 1: 1-25 NB Ramps & CR-34 Page 106 of Background AM (2023) 05/07/2018 sfr t � Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL VVBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 '* 4* Traffic Volume (vph) 37 158 0 0 296 42 118 2 88 C 0 0 Future Volume (vph) 37 158 0 0 296 42 118 2 88 0 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 100 100 100 100 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1846 0 0 1827 0 0 1715 0 0 0 0 Flt Permitted 0.991 0.971 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1846 0 0 1827 0 0 1715 0 0 0 0 Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 45 566 8.6 45 555 8.4 30 682 15.5 30 710 16.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.80 0.77 0.92 0.92 0.81 0.69 0.46 0.50 0.53 0.92 0.92 0.92 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 251 0 0 426 0 0 427 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop In. ersection Summary t Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 50.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 K:1DUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands -1-4 - Analysis\Synchro\Background AM (2023) syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report nut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 1: 1-25 NB Ramps & CR-34 Page 107 of Background AM (2023) 05/07/2018 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 17.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR \A/BL ViBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SB T SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 37 Future Vol, veh/h 37 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Free RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Medan Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor 80 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 Mvmt Flow 46 4 158 158 0 Free None r t .7)(4(--) 0 0 0 0 - - 77 92 92 81 69 46 2 2 2 2 2 205 0 0 365 61 257 0 Free None Stop Stop Y • 4 1 a 2 88 0 0 0 118 2 88 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Stop Stop Stop Stop None - - None VO 0 0 50 53 2 2 4 166 ea 92 2 0 VO 0 92 2 0 ab 92 2 0 Malor!Minor Majorl Major2 Mori Conflicting Flow All 426 Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1133 Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1133 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 • 4.12 0 n 6Q 4 724 205 - 298 298 - 396 426 - - 6.42 6.52 6.22 - 5.42 5.52 - - 5.42 5.52 -' 3.518 4.018 3.318 409 352 836 - 753 667 - 680 586 - 390 - 390 718 680 0 836 0 0 0 HCM Control Delay, s 1.5 0 j J HCM LOS E Minor Lane/Malo r Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT ViBT WBR Capacity (veh/h) 493 1133 HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.865 43.3 E 9.2 0.041 8.3 A 0.1 K:1DUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\SynchrolBackground AM (2023) syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report nut:blank 6/79/2( Pale 108 of The Highlands Background AM (2023) 2: 1-25 SB Ramps & CR-34 05/07/2018 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations I+ Traffic Volume (vph) 4 4+ 0 99 163 208 206 0 0 0 0 95 5 35 Future Volume (vph) 0 99 163 208 206 0 0 0 0 95 5 35 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 100 100 100 100 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1708 0 0 1824 0 0 0 0 0 1745 0 Flt Permitted 0.979 0.965 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1708 0 0 1824 0 0 0 0 0 1745 0 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 771 566 608 809 Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Conti. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Growth Factor 11.7 86 13.8 18.4 0.92 0.69 0.72 0.76 0.56 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.76 0.50 0.94 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parting (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 369 0 0 642 0 0 0 0 0 172 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Intersection Summary_ Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 55.2% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 K:\DUR_LDEV\096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\Background AM (2023) syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 2:1-25 SB Ramps & CR-34 Page 109 of Background AM (2023) 05/07/2018 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 16.9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, vehlh Future Vol, veh/h r. 4 0 99 0 99 163 208 163 208 206 0 206 0 0 0 0 95 0 0 0 95 5 35 5 35 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Free Free RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 elm Free Free - None 411. Free Free - None 0 0 Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop - None - - None 0 ine 0 0 410 Peak Hour Factor 92 69 72 76 56 92 92 92 92 76 50 94 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 143 226 274 368 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 125 2 2 10 37 Major/Minor Majorl Ma.jor2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Sty 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 0 Stage 1 0 Stage 2 0 0 0 370 0 - 4.12 �� - .. L I 1189 0 1172 915 257 6.42 5.42 5.42 3.518 213 390 1285 368 915 370 - 6.52 6.22 5.52 5.52 - 4.018 3.318 165 677 352 0 786 620 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver Mov Cap -2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 AO 1189 010 151 151 277 786 0 677 0 0 0 10. HCM Control Delay, s F HCM LOS Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBT [BR 'WBL WBT SBLn1 Capacity (vehlh) - 1 189 - 184 HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile O(veh) - 0.23 - 8.9 - 0.936 0 102.1 A A F - 0.9 - 7.3 K:1DUR_LDEV1O96214O32 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\SynchrotBackground AM (2023) syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 3: 3rd St. (CR4) & Welker Ave. (CR-34) Page 110 of Background AM (2023) 05/07/2018 uNit t \\* Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR Slit SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane Width (ft) Grade (%) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted 49 4 20 154 r? 1 /U 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 12 12 1_ 12 12 0 0% 0 0 100 0 1807 0.995 0 C 0 100 0 0 1853 0.995 I 45 89 i5 89 1900 1900 12 44 39 39 1900 12 0% 150 0 1 0 100 1583 0 1790 0.967 b 88 92 37 6 88 92 37 1900 1900 1900 1900 12 12 12 12 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 1174 0 0.982 Said. Flow (perm) 0 1807 0 0 1853 1583 0 1790 0 0 1774 0 Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Growth Factor 25 894 24.4 25 990 27.0 1 35 624 12.2 25 646 17.6 1 0.53 0.55 0.70 0.64 0.55 0.70 0.58 0.65 0.63 0.79 0.76 0.57 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehides (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Sign Control 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0 392 Stop 0% 0 0 353 Stop 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 64 0 223 Stop 0% 0 0 297 0 Stop intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 45.2% Analysis Period (min) 15 ICU Level of Service A K:\DUR_LDEV\096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\SynchrolBackground AM (2023).syn Kirnley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 3: 3rd St. (CR7) & Welker Ave. (CR-34) Page 1 11 of Background AM (2023) 05/07/2018 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 25 Intersection LOS C Movement EBL EBT EBR ViBL NBT V1/4/BR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4, 4 r Traffic Vol, veh/h 20 154 52 21 176 45 89 39 6 88 92 37 Future Vol, veh/h 20 154 52 21 176 45 89 39 6 88 92 37 Peak Hour Factor 0.53 0.55 0.70 0.64 0.55 0.70 0.58 0.65 0.63 0.79 0.76 0.57 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 38 280 74 33 320 64 153 60 10 111 121 65 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB Opposing Lanes 2 Conflicting Approach Left SB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 HCM Control Delay 29 9 HCM LOS D EB 1 NB 1 SB 1 26.2 D SB 1 EB 1 WB 2 18.2 C NB 1 WB 2 EB 1 21 9 C Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 WBLn2 S.BLn1 Vol Left, % 66% 9% 11% 0% 41% Vol Thai, % 29% 68% 89% 0% 42% Vol Right, % Sign Control Traffic Vol by Lane 4% 23% 0% 100% 17% Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop 134 226 197 45 217 LT Vol 89 20 21 0 88 Through Vol RT Vol Lane Flow Rate 39 154 176 0 92 6 52 0 45 37 223 392 353 64 297 Geometry Grp Degree of Util (X) Departure Headway (Hd) Convergence, Y/N Cap Service Time 2 5 7 7 2 0.486 0.768 0.741 0.121 0.616 7.854 7.054 7.565 6.79 7.459 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 457 514 476 527 482 5.931 5.118 5.329 4 553 5.528 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.488 0.763 0.742 0.121 0.616 HCM Control Delay 18.2 29.9 29.1 10.5 21.9 HCM Lane LOS CDDBC HCM 95th -rile O 2 6 6 8 6.1 0 4 4 1 K ' DUR_LDEV\096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\Background AM (2023).syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report n it:hlank 6/29/2( The Highlands 4: CR-7 & CR-36 Page 112 of Background AM (2023) 05/07/2018 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT &%, 'NBR NBL NBT NBR SBt SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4+ 'I 1* 4 r 4+ Traffic Volume (vph) 1 1 2 88 9 9 1 42 15 1 89 3 Future Volume (vph) 1 1 2 88 9 9 1 42 15 1 89 3 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 110 0 0 200 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 100 80 100 100 Satd. Flow (prat) 0 1750 0 1770 1665 0 0 1857 1583 0 1848 0 Flt Permitted 0.984 0 950 0.997 0.999 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1750 0 1770 1665 0 0 1857 1583 0 1848 0 Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) 25 35 521 702 35 45 699 522 Travel Time (s) 14.2 13 7 13.6 7.9 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.25 0.25 0.50 0.83 0.67 0.29 0.25 0.69 0.54 0.25 0.66 0.38 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 1 CO% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 12 0 106 44 0 0 65 28 0 147 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 23.9% Analysis Period (min) 15 ICU Level of Service A K:1DUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\Background AM (2023) syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:hlank 6129/2( The Highlands 4: CR-7 & CR-36 Page 113 of Background AM (2023) 05/07/2018 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 4.3 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 1 Future Vol, veh/h 1 1 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 Grade, % - 0 Peak Hour Factor 25 25 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 Mvmt Flow 4 4 Major/Minor - Minor2 2 88 9 2 88 9 0 0 0 Stop Stop Stop None 50 2 4 110 83 2 106 Minorl 0 0 67 2 13 9 9 0 Stop None 29 L 31 4 1 42 1 42 0 0 Free Free r 1 15 0 Free None 200 44 1 89 89 0 0 Free Free 3 3 0 Free None 0 - - 0 0 - - 0 25 69 54 25 66 38 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 61 28 4 135 8 Major] Major2 Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap -1 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver Mov Cap -2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 238 216 139 220 147 147 - 69 91 69 - 151 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 220 61 143 69 151 6.52 6.22 4.12 0 61 0 0 - 4.12 DID 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 6.12 3.518 716 856 916 5.52 4.018 682 775 837 - 6.12 5.52 3.318 3.518 4.018 909 736 678 941 837 851 772 3.318 2.218 1004 1440 - 2.218 - 1542 AND OD 680 680 853 678 909 678 - 773 - 726 726 938 674 674 834 1004 1440 - 1542 • - 2 871 834 - 840 770 HCM M i.:ontrol Delay S Ha �:i LOS Minor Lane/'Major k vmt 1 Th C NBL NBT NBR EBLnIWBLnW1/4/BLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio 1440 - - 742 726 875 1542 - 0.003 - - 0.016 0.146 0.051 0.003 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 0 - 9.9 10.8 9.3 7.3 0 HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) A A 0 A B A A A 0 0.5 0.2 0 K:\DUR_LDEV\096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\SynchrolBackground AM (2023) syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report nut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 1: 1-25 NB Ramps & CR-34 Page l 14 of Background PM (2023) 05/07/2018 Lane Group EBL EB 1- 4-- 44\ EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 23 Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane Width (ft) Grade (%) 4 1+ 112 0 0 147 122 71 1 0 0 0 23 112 0 0 147 122 71 i 9`:, 0 0 0 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 "900 1900 1900 1900 1900 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 0%% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Satd. Flow (plot) Flt Permitted 0 0 100 0 1850 0 993 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 1749 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 1687 0.979 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 Said. Flow (perm) 0 1850 0 0 1749 0 0 1687 0 0 0 0 Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Conti. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Growth Factor 45 566 8.6 45 555 8.4 30 682 15.5 30 710 16 1 0.83 0.66 0.92 0.92 0.86 0.88 0.69 0.25 0.71 0.92 0.92 0.92 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (Mr) Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Sign Control 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0 198 Free 0% 0 0 310 Free 0% 0 0 241 Stop 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0 Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capaci Analysis Period (min) 15 ty Utilization 42.1% ICU Level of Service A KADUR_LDEV\096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\SynchrolBackground PM (2023) syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report nit:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 1: 1-25 NB Ramps & CR-34 Page 115 of Background PM (2023) 05/07/2018 intersection Int Delay, siveh Movement 45 EBL EBT [BR WBL 'NBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 23 Future Vol, veh/h 23 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Free RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow 83 2 28 Major/Minor Majorl 4 112 112 0 Free an 0 0 66 2 170 0 0 0 Free None 92 2 0 0 0 0 Free 147 147 0 Free 0 - 0 92 86 88 69 2 2 2 2 0 171 139 103 122 122 0 Free None 71 1 95 71 1 95 0 0 0 Stop Stop Stop None Major2 Mori 0 0 25 71 2 2 4 134 0 0 0 Stop 92 2 0 0 0 0 Stop 0 92 2 0 0 0 0 Stop None 92 2 0 Conflicting Flow All 310 Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1250 Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1250 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach EB 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 465 - 225 240 - 6.42 - 5.42 - 5.42 - 3.518 - 556 - 812 - 800 - 542 - 542 - 792 - 800 NB HCM Control Delay, s 1 1 HCM LOS 0 l3 B 535 170 225 310 - 6.52 6.22 5.52 5.52 4.018 3.318 452 874 718 659 0 874 0 0 0 Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT WBT WBR Capacity (veh/h) 690 1250 HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.349 0.022 13 7.9 0 B A A 1.6 0.1 K:1DUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\Background PM (2023).syn Kimley-Horr Synchro 9 Report rut:blank 6/29/2( Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane Width (ft) Grade (%) Storage Length (ft) SiTaper Length (ft) The Highlands 2: 1-25 SB Ramps & CR-34 Page 116 of Background PM (2©23) 05/07/2018 4- t "fr \b. Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SSt_ SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 1+ 4 4 0 131 88 42 166 0 0 0 0 34 1 48 0 131 88 42 166 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 12 12 12 12 12 0/© 0°i% 0 #orage Lanes 0 100 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 34 1 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 12 12 12 12 12 12 0% 0% 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 100 48 1900 12 0 0 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1766 0 0 1844 0 0 0 0 0 1692 0 Flt Permitted 0.990 0.979 Said. Flow (perm) 0 1766 0 0 1844 0 0 0 0 0 1692 0 Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) 45 45 30 30 771 566 608 809 Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Growth Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) Bus Blockages (#/hr) Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Sign Control 11.7 86 13.8 184 0.92 0.81 0.86 0.82 0 85 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.81 0.25 0.93 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100`'/0 100% 100% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0 264 Free 0% 0 0 246 Free 0 0 0 Stop 0°/, 0 0 98 0 Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 38.2% Analysis Period (min) 15 ICU Level of Service A K:IDUR_LDEV\096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\SynchrolBackground PM (2023).syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 2:1-25 SB Ramps & CR-34 Page 1 17 of Background PM (2023) 05/07/2018 Intersection Int Delay. siveh Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h Future Vol, veh/h U 131 88 131 88 42 166 0 0 0 0 34 1 48 42 166 0 0 0 0 34 1 48 Conflicting Peds, //Mr 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RI Channelized - None - None - - None - - None 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 Grade, % - 0 0 0 0 alb SIP 0 0 ISM Peak Hour Factor 92 81 86 82 85 92 92 92 92 81 25 93 Heavy Vehicles: % 2 Mvmt Flow 0 2 2 2 102 51 195 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 42 4 52 lagor/Miner Ma pr1 Maior2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap -1 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blo:ked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver Mov Cap -2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 0 0 0 0 0 26(1 4.12 - 2.218 1300 - 1300 0 0 511 562 195 298 298 213 264 6.42 6.52 6.22 5.42 5.52 5.42 5.52 - 3.518 4.018 3.318 523 436 846 753 667 - 823 690 - 500 500 720 823 0 846 0 0 0 Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 11.6 HCM LOS Minor.. Lane/Major Mvmt EBI EBR W..BL WBT•SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) - 1300 - 646 HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile O(veh) - 0.039 - 7.9 - 0.151 0 11.6 A A B - 0.1 - 0.5 K:1DUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\Background PM (2023).syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 3: 3rd St. (CR1) & Welker Ave. (CR-34) Page 118f: Background PM (2023) 05/07/2018 -÷ .4\1 c t \*. Lane Group EBL L EBT EBR WBL V1 BT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL S8T SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 41 4 r 4, 4, 122 64 12 96 102 75 125 27 70 80 41 Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane Width (ft) Grade (%) Storage Length (ft) 122 64 12 96 102 75 125 27 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 0% 0% 0% 0 0 0 150 0 70 80 1900 1900 12 12 0% 0 0 41 1900 12 0 Storage Lanes 0 Taper Length (ft) 100 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1768 Flt Permitted 0.991 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 1848 1583 0992 100 100 0 1800 0 0 1754 0 0.982 0.981 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1768 0 0 1848 1583 0 1800 0 0 1754 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 35 25 L ink Distance (ft) 894 990 624 646 Travel Time (s) Conti. Peds. (Ii/hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 24.4 27.0 12.2 17.6 Peak Hour Factor 0.55 0.55 0.47 0.50 0.74 0.76 0.65 0.79 0.72 0.60 0.82 0.46 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Sign Control 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0 433 Stop 0 0 154 Stop 0% 134 0 311 Stop 0% 0 0 304 0 Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized I ntersection Capacity Utilization 41.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 K:\DUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\Background PM (2023) syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report nut:blank 6129/2( The Highlands 3: 3rd St. (CR7) & Welker Ave. (CR-34) Page 119 of Background PM (2023) 05/07/2018 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh Intersection LOS 24.8 Movement EB! EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL air SBR Lane Configurations t t -t* r Traffic Vol, vehth 41 12` �i i 1 ►V) 75 125 27 Iii 41 Future Vol, veh/h 41 7U Peak Hour Factor 0.55 0 55 0 .j 050 074 0.76 0.65 0.79 072 060 0 82 0.46 Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow Number of Lanes 75 222 0 1 1 L 1:30 2 2 2 134 115 158 0 1 JO 117 89 1 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach Opposing Lanes Conflicting Approach Left Conflicting Lanes Left Conflicting Approach Right Conflicting Lanes Right HCM Control Delay HCM LOS WB 2 SB 1 NB 1 36 2 E EB 1 NB 1 SB 1 138 B SB 1 EB 1 WB 2 22.4 C NB 1 WB 2 EB 1 21.6 C r BLn 1 FBLn 1 WBLn1 WBLn2 SBLp1 Vol Left, % 37,-18°h 0% 370/0 Vol Thru, % 54% 89% 0% 42% Vol Right, % Sign Control Traffic Vol by Lane 28°/_ Sop Stop 227 Li' Stop 108 100% 21% Stop Stop 102 191 LT Vol 75 41 12 0 70 Through Vol RT Vol Lane Flow Rate 125 122 27 64 311 433 96 0 154 0 102 134 80 41 303 Geometry Grp Degree of Util (X) Departure Headway (Hd) Convergence, YIN Cap Service Time 2 5 7 7 2 0.635 7.347 Yes 492 5.416 0.835 6.951 Yes 519 5.012 0.341 7.991 Yes 449 5.763 0.269 0.618 7.211 7.328 Yes Yes 497 491 4.983 5.396 HCM Lane WC Ratio 0.632 0.834 0.343 0.27 0.617 HCM Control Delay HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th -tile Q 22.4 36.2 C E 4.4 8.4 14.9 B 1.5 12.6 21.6 B C 1.1 4 1 K:1DUR_LDEV\096214032 The Highlands\14 - Analysis\Synchro\Background PM (2023).syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 4: CR-7 & CR-36 Page 120 of Background PM (2023) 05/07/2018 Lane Group EBL 4- --4 t -� t tfr \*. FBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane Width (ft) 3 3 1900 12 +14 8 8 1900 12 1 49 1 49 1900 1900 12 12 1 13 2 1 13 2 1900 1900 1900 12 12 12 4 124 124 1900 12 85 85 1900 12 7 7 1900 12 0, 59 59 1900 12 1 1 1900 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Said. Flow (pot) Flt Permitted 0 0 100 0 1800 0.991 0 100 0 1 80 0 1770 0 950 0 0 0 0 100 1632 0 0 1861 0999 200 0 0 1 0 0 100 1583 0 1840 0 0.993 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1800 Link Speed (mph) 0 1770 1632 0 0 1861 1583 0 1840 0 L Travel Time (s) 14.2 Conti. Peds. (#/hr) Conn. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Growth Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) Bus Blockages (#/hr) Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 22 Sign Control Stop 25 35 35 45 nk Distance (ft) 521 702 699 522 13.7 13.6 7.9 0.75 0.58 0.25 0.66 0.25 0.69 0.50 0.76 0.91 0.50 0.67 0.25 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%% 0 74 23 Stop 0% 0 0 167 Free 0% 93 0 106 0 Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 24.3% Analysis Period (min) 15 ICU Level of Service A K:IDUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\SynchrotBackground PM (2023).syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:hlank 6/29/2( The Highlands 4: CR-7 & CR-36 Page 121 of Background PM (2023) 05/07/2018 Intersection Ind C?Dia iveh Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT VVBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol veh/h Future Vol veh/h Conflicting Peds, #/hr Sign Control RT Channelized 3 3 0 Stop 8 8 0 Stop 1 4 1 49 1 13 2 124 1 49 1 13 2 124 0 0 0 0 0 0 Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free None - None Storage Length - - 100 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 Grade, "/f, - 0 Peak Hour Factor 75 58 25 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 4 14 4 • 0 0 66 25 2 2 74 4 69 2 19 0 0 50 76 2 2 4 163 85 7 59 85 7 59 0 0 0 Free Free Free None - 200 0 0 91 50 67 2 2 2 93 14 88 1 1 0 Free None 25 2 4 Major/Minor Minor2 Minorl Maiorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap -1 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver Mov Cap -2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 301 289 90 298 291 163 92 0 0 163 0 0 118 118 - 171 171 183 171 - 127 120 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - 412 612 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - 2.218 651 621 968 654 619 882 1503 - - 1416 887 798 831 757 819 757 877 796 628 628 884 795 Approach EB 613 968 613 - 790 - 755 634 634 829 850 WS 611 882 1503 611 755 788 NB - 1416 SB HCM Control Delay, s 10.6 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt 11 B 0.1 1 NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn11NBLn2 SBL SBT SBR - 660 634 818 1416 - 0.033 0.117 0.028 0.01 0 - 10.6 11.4 9.5 7.6 0 A - B B A A A - 0.1 0.4 0.1 0 Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1503 0.003 7.4 A 0 Mb K:1DUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\Background PM (2023) syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 122 of: SimTraffic Performance Report Background AM (2023) 05/08/2018 1: 1-25 NB Ramps & CR-34 Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB All Denied Del/Veh (s) Total DelNeh (s) 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.2 2.4 1.2 13.4 5.0 2: 1-25 SB Ramps & CR-34 Performance by approach Approach EB WB SB All Denied DelNeh (s) 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 1 Total DelNeh (s) 1.8 4.8 23 5 70 3: 3rd St. (CR-7) & Welker Ave. (CR-34) Performance by approach Approach EB 'NB NB SB All Denied DelNeh (s) 0.3 0.9 0.2 0.2 0.4 rotal DelNeh (s) 7.6 7.8 8.2 7.0 7.6 4: CR-7 & CR-36 Performance by approach Denied DelNeh (s) 0.1 3.3 1.3 0.2 1.6 Total Del/Veh (s) 5.2 4.7 0.1 0.9 2.3 Total Network Performance Denied DelNeh (s) 0.5 total DelNeh (s) 8.8 The Highlands Kimley-Horn SimTraffic Report Page 1 nut:blank 6/2912( Page 123 of: SimTraffic Performance Report Background AM (2023) 05/08/2018 1: 1-25 NB Ramps & CR-34 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR All Denied DelNeh (s) Total DelNeh (s) 00 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.3 01 02 02 3 1 2.3 1.3 0.3 16.6 16.3 9.4 5.0 2: 1-25 SB Ramps & CR-34 Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT SBL SB Denied DelNeh (s) Total DelNeh (s) SBR _ All 0.2 0.3 00 fltl 02 *1 2 01 30 1.1 48 4.8 252 26.2 175 7.0 3: 3rd St. (CR-7) & Welker Ave. (CR-34) Performance by movement Movement . . EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied DelNeh (s) Total DelNeh (s) 03 03 02 04 04 30 02 02 0.2 02 8.5 8.1 59 81 8.9 3.6 7.5 10.1 49 66 78 54 3: 3rd St. (CR7) & Welker Ave. (CR-34) Performance by movement Movement AU Denied DelNeh (s) Total DelNeh (s) 76 4: CR-7 & CR-36 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied DelNeh (s) Total DelNeh (s) 0.1 0 1 0 1 .1 0 0 1 1 4 0 4.0 77 33 49 74 20 2+ 01 01 4: CR-7 & CR-36 Performance by movement 02 02 0.9 0.0 Movement All Denied DelNeh (s) Total Del/Veh (s) 16 2.3 Total Network Performance Denied DelNeh (s) Total Del/Veh (s) 38 The Highlands Kimley-Horn SimTraffic Report Page 1 nit:Hank 6/29/2( Page 124 of SimTraffic Performance Report Background PM (2023) 05/08/2018 1: 1-25 NB Ramps & CR-34 Performance by approach /Approach EB WB NB AM Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 Total DelNeh (s) 1.4 1.1 5.5 2.4 2: 1-25 SB Ramps & CR-34 Performance by approach Approach EB WB SB All Denied DelNeh (s) 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.1 Total DelNeh (s) 1.0 1.8 4.6 1.9 3: 3rd St. (CR-7) & Welker Ave. (CR-34) Performance by approach Appr ..asdis. EB WB NB SB All Denied DelNeh (s) 0.3 1.7 0.2 0.2 0.6 Total DelNeh (s) 10.9 5.7 9.5 7.6 8.5 4: CR-7 & CR-36 Performance by approach Aooroach EB WB SB All Denied DelNeh (s) 0.1 Total DelNeh (s) J D 1.9 0.1 1.8 6.0 4.4 0.2 0.8 1.3 Total Network Performance Denied DelNeh (s) 0.7 Total DelNeh (s) 6.1 The Highlands Kimley-Horn SimTraffic Report Page 1 )ut:blank 6/2912( Page 125 of: SimTraffic Performance Report Background PM (2023) 05/08/2018 1: 1-25 NB Ramps & CR-34 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR All Denied DeVVeh (s) Total Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 C3 0.2 0.2 01 0.2 0.2 2.1 1.3 1.7 0.5 7.2 10.0 4.4 2.4 2: 1-25 SB Ramps & CR-34 Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT SBL SBT SBR All Denied DeVVeh (s) Total Del/Veh (s) 02 0 2 C0 00 fli C1 m 1 01 13 0.5 20 1.7 65 10.0 3 1 19 3: 3rd St. (CR7) & Welker Ave. (CR-34) Performance by movement Movement Denied DelNeh (s) Total DelNeh (s) EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR rj 03 02 0 3 04 3.0 02 0 2 0.3 0.2 03 103 117 97 61 70 4.5 8.5 10.6 6-4 7.7 8.4 6.4 3: 3rd St. (CR-7) & Welker Ave. (CR-34) Performance by movement Movement All Denied DelNeh (s) Total DelNeh (s) 06 85 4: CR-7 & CR-36 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied DelNeh (s) Total DelNeh (s) 01 0 1 0 ._4 n F1 03 01 4 4.9 65 38 48 75 2.3 27 02 4: CR-7 & CR-36 Performance by movement vement All • 1 8 GI L0 Denied Del!Veh (s) Total DelNeh (s) 13 Total Network Performance Denied Del; Veh (s) Total DelNeh (s) The Highlands Kimley-Horn SimTraffic Report Page 1 )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 126 of Appendix G: Synchro & SimTraffic Output: Build -out (2023) nut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 1: 1-25 NB Ramps & CR-34 Page 127 of Build AM (2023) 05/07/2018 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 1+ 4 Traffic Volume (vph) 79 164 0 0 298 42 138 2 88 0 0 0 Future Volume (vph) 79 164 0 0 298 42 138 2 88 0 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 100 100 100 100 Satd. Flow (prof) 0 1833 0 0 1827 0 0 1718 0 0 0 0 Flt Permitted 0.984 0.969 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1833 0 0 1827 0 0 1718 0 0 0 0 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 566 555 682 710 Travel Time (s) 8 6 8.4 15 5 16.1 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Conti. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.80 0.77 0.92 0.92 0.81 0.69 0.46 0.50 0.53 0.92 0.92 0.92 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100 %} 100% 100% 100",6 100 100`'x-. 100`!; 100`T)49 100`71) 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0"' Q'�%-1 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Sign Control 2% 296 0 0 0 312 0 0 429 0 0 470 0 0 0 0 Free Free Stop Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.4% Analysis Period (min) 15 ICU Level of Service A K:IDUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\Build AM (2023).syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 1: 1-25 NB Ramps & CR-34 Page 128 of Build AM (2023) 05/07/2018 Interseetion Int Delay, s/veh 50.5 Movement EBL EBT EBR `J BL 'AM- V,''1BR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, vehlh 79 Future Vol, veh/h 79 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Free PT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 Grade, % - 0 Peak Hour Factor 80 77 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 99 213 0 4 164 164 0 Free 0 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free None • 298 298 0 Free 42 138 2 88 0 42 0 Free None 138 0 Stop 0 0 - 92 81 69 46 2 2 2 0 368 61 300 2 88 0 0 Stop Stop - None 0 0 50 53 2 2 4 166 • 0 Stop r 92 2 0 0 Stop 0 Stop None 0 92 92 2 0 0 Major/Minor Majorl fillajor2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 429 0 Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1130 Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1130 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 em 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 808 - 410 - 398 - 6.42 - 5.42 - 5.42 - 3.518 - 350 - 670 - 678 40 - 315 - 315 - 604 - 678 839 213 410 429 - 6.52 6.22 5.52 - 5.52 - 4.018 3.318 302 827 595 584 0 827 0 0 0 111 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 128.3 HCM LOS Minor LanelMajor Mvrnt NBLni EBL EBT '/181 VIBR R Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile O(veh) 404 1130 1.163 0.087 128.3 8.5 F A 18 0.3 K:\DUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\Build AM (2023) syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:hlank 6/2912( The Highlands 2: 1-25 SB Ramps & CR-34 Page 129 of Build AM (2023) 05/07/2018 f .4- P Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Sl' Lane Configurations '+ 4 4 Traffic Volume (vph) 0 147 224 208 228 0 0 0 0 95 5 49 Future Volume (vph) 0 147 224 208 228 0 0 0 0 95 5 49 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Widtt (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 100 100 100 100 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1714 0 0 1825 0 0 0 0 0 1735 0 Flt Permitted 0.980 0.968 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1714 0 0 1825 0 0 0 0 0 1735 0 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 771 566 608 809 Travel Time (s) 11 7 8 6 13.8 18 4 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Confl. Bikes (41hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.69 0.72 0.76 0.56 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.76 0.50 0.94 Growth Factor 100% 100% 1001/0 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2°r° 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (Mr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0`;f;) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 524 0 0 681 0 0 0 0 0 187 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Tyre Unsignalized Intersectior Capacity Utilization 63.5% Analysis Period (min) 15 ICU Level of Service B K:\DUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\Build AM (2023).syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 2: 1-25 SB Ramps & CR-34 Page 130 of Build AM (2023) 05/07/2018 intersection Int Delay. srveh 30.6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBl SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h Future Vol, veh/h Conflicting Peds, #/hr Sign Control RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 Free 11. 147 147 0 Free 224 224 0 Free None 208 208 0 Free 4 228 228 0 Free 0 0 - 0 - - 0 92 69 72 76 56 2 2 2 2 2 0 213 311 274 407 0 0 0 Free None 92 2 0 0 0 0 Stop 0 0 0 0 0 0 Stop Stop None 95 95 0 Stop 5 49 5 49 0 0 Stop Stop - None 0 0 - 0 92 92 92 76 50 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 125 10 94 2 52 Major/Minor Majori Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 0 Stage 1 0 Stage 2 0 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver Mov Cap -2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 0 0 524 0 0 - 4.12 - 2.218 - 1043 - 1043 0 0 0 1324 1479 407 955 955 369 524 6.42 6.52 6.22 542 5.52 5.42 5.52 - 3.518 4.018 3.318 172 126 644 374 337 699 530 - 114 -- 114 247 699 0 644 0 0 0 Approach EB WB SB 'duo Control Delay s irk:: L O S 0 9 213.4 F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBT EBR. WBL WBT SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio H C M Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile O(veh) Notes 1043 - 150 - 0.26` - 1.248 - 97 0 213.4 A A F - 1.1 11 -: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon K: \DUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\Build AM (2023) syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 3: 3rd St. (CR-i) & Welker Ave. (CR-34) Page 131 of: Build AM (2023) 05/07/2018 a\' 11- 4-- t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4. 4 r 4. 4. Traffic Volume (vph) 22 154 52 21 176 81 89 41 6 197 98 43 Future Volume (vph) 22 154 52 21 176 81 89 41 6 197 98 43 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 150 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 100 100 100 100 Satd. Flow (prof) 0 1807 0 0 1853 1583 0 1790 0 0 1773 0 Flt Permitted 0 995 0.995 0.967 0.973 Said. Flow (perm) 0 1807 0 0 1853 1583 0 1790 0 0 1773 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 35 25 Link Distance (ft) 894 990 624 646 Travel Time (s) 24.4 27 0 12 2 17 6 Conti. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 Conti. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.53 0.55 0.70 0.64 0 55 0 70 0.58 0.65 0.63 0.79 0.76 0.57 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100`' ' 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0`-, 0% 0% 0`!1 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 396 0 0 353 116 0 226 0 0 453 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.0% Analysis Period (min) 15 ICU Level of Service A K DUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\Build AM (2023) syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:blank 6129/2( The Highlands 3: 3rd St. (CR-7) & Welker Ave. (CR-34) Page 132 of Build AM (2023) 05/07/2018 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 53.7 Intersection LOS F Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4* 4 r 4 4 Traffic Vol, veh/h 22 154 52 21 176 81 89 41 6 197 98 43 Future Vol, veh/h 22 154 52 21 176 81 89 41 6 197 98 43 Peak Hour Factor 0.53 0.55 0.70 0.64 0.55 0.70 0.58 0.65 0.63 0.79 0.76 0.57 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 42 280 74 33 320 116 153 63 10 249 129 75 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB Opposing Lanes 2 Conflicting Approach Left SB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 HCM Control Delay 54 HCM LOS F EB 1 NB 1 SB 1 38.4 E SB 1 EB 1 WB 2 24.7 C NB 1 WB 2 EB 1 83 7 F NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 WBLn2 SBLn1 Vol Left, % Vol Thru, % Vol Right % Sign Control Traffic Vol by Lane 65% 10"' 110k,, 00/CJ 5804) 30% 68% 89% 0% 29% 4°/0 234)/o 0% 100/, 13`/; Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop 136 228 197 81 338 LT Vol 89 22 21 0 197 Through Vol RT Vol Lane Flow Rate 41 154 176 0 98 6 52 0 81 43 226 396 353 16 454 Geometry Grp 2 5 7 7 2 Degree of Util (X) Departure Headway (Hd) Convergence, Y/ N Cap Service Time HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th -tile O 0.576 0.91 0.855 0.256 1.041 9.521 8.584 9.024 8.24 8.26 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 382 424 406 439 440 7.521 6 584 6.724 5.94 6 332 0.592 0.934 0.869 0.264 1.032 24 7 54 46 5 13 8 83 7 C F E B F 35 9.8 83 1 141 K:1DUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\SynchrotBuild AM (2023).syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 4: CR-7 & CR-36 Page 133 of: Build AM (2023) 05/07/2018 Lane Group o 4-- t -� t I EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations t{. Traffic Volume (vph) 1 1 Future Volume (vph) 1 1 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 Grade (%) 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 Storage Lanes 0 Taper Length (ft) 100 Satd. Flow (plot) 0 1750 Flt Permitted 0.984 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1750 Link Speed (mph) 25 Link Distance (ft) 521 Travel Time (s) 14 2 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.25 0.25 Growth Factor 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 Parking (#lhr) Mid -Black Traffic (%) 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 12 Sign Control Stop Intersection Summary 2 2 1900 12 118 118 1900 12 0 110 0 1 80 0 1770 0.950 0 1770 0.50 100');0 La/o 0 1 9 9 1900 12 0% 9 9 1900 12 0 0 1665 0 1665 0 35 2186 42 6 0.83 0.61 100% 100% 2% 2°/n 0 0 0 142 44 Stop P 4 1 42 25 1 89 3 1 42 25 1 89 3 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 12 12 12 12 12 12 0% 0% 0 200 0 0 0 1 0 0 100 100 0 1857 1583 0 1848 0 0.997 0.999 0 1857 1583 0 1848 0 35 45 1157 522 22.5 7 9 0.29 0.25 100% 100% 2% 2% 0 0 0.69 0.54 0.25 0.66 0.38 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 65 Free 0% 46 0 147 0 Free Area Type: Other Control Type Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 25.5% Analysis Period (min) 15 ICU Level of Service A K:1DUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\SynchrolBuild AM (2023).syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:blanL 6/29/2( The Highlands 4: CR-7 & CR-36 Page 134 of Build AM (2023) 05/07/2018 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.8 Movrnent EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4+ Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 1 2 118 9 9 1 42 11, a 25 1 89 Future Vol, veh/h 1 1 2 118 9 9 1 42 25 0 0 0 0 Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Conflicting Peds, /Mr Sign Control 0 0 0 0 RT Channelized - None Storage Length - - - 110 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - None - None - 200 1 0.0 0 - None 0 0 0 Grade, % - C 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 25 25 50 83 67 29 25 69 54 25 66 38 Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 4 142 13 31 4 61 46 4 135 8 Major/Minor Mnor2 Minorl Major] Major2 Conflicting Flow All 238 216 139 220 220 61 143 0 0 61 0 0 Stage 1 147 147 - 69 69 Stage 2 91 69 - 151 151 Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 716 682 909 736 678 1004 1440 Stage 1 856 775 - 941 837 - - 2.218 - 1542 - Stage 2 916 837 - 851 772 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 680 678 909 726 674 1004 1440 - 1542 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 680 678 853 773 871 834 - 726 674 y 938 834 - 840 770 • gle 1CM Control Delay, s 9.9 10.7 0.3 0.2 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/ ajpr. Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLnl\INBLn1 VBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (vehlh) 1440 E 1: HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 7 7 9.9 11.2 9.3 7..: A B A A 0 0.7 0.2 0 K !DUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\Build AM (2023) syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:hlank 6/29/2( The Highlands 5: CR-7 & Site Driveway Page 135 of Build AM (2023) 05/07/2018 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT N BR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 91 0 68 30 Future Volume (vph) 91 0 68 30 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (fl) 12 12 12 12 0 0 1900 iT 210 l-, 1900 1 Grade (96) 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 Storage Lanes 1 Taper Length (ft) 100 Satd. Flow (prof) 1770 Flt Permitted 0.950 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 1785 0 0 1863 Satd. Flow (perm) Link Speed (mph) 25 35 Link Distance (ft) 515 406 Travel Time (s) 14.0 7.9 Confl. Peds. (#Ihr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1770 0 1785 0 0 18o3 35 1157 22.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#rhr) Mid -Block traffic (%) 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Sign Control 99 Stop 0% 0 107 Free 0% 0 0 228 Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 22.8% Analysis Period (min) 15 ICU Level of Service A K: 1DUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\Build AM (2023) syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 5: CR-7 & Site Driveway Page 136 of Build AM (2023) 05/07/2018 Intersection tilt Delay s/v'eh .6 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h Future Vol, veh/h tylf ti• 91 0 68 91 0 68 0 0 4 2i(] 210 Conflicting Peds, #/hr Sign Control 0 0 0 0 0 PT Channelized Storage Length Stop Stop Free Free Free - None 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 None None 0 II Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 Mvmt Flow 99 0 2 74 3, 0 228 Major/Minor Minorl Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 318 90 0 0 107 0 Stage 1 90 Stage 2 228 Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 Critical Hdwy Sty 2 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 675 968 Stage 1 934 as - 4.12 AMP - 2.218 - 1484 Stage 2 810 Platoon blocked: % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 675 968 - 1484 AP Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 675 Stage 1 934 Stage 2 810 Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay 11.2 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBR !`BLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - 675 148d HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile O(veh) - 112 B 0.5 0 K:1DUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\SynchrolBuild AM (2023) syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report nut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 6: Site Driveway & CR-36 Page 1 3 7 of Build AM (2023) 05/07/2018 ev Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1+ 4 V Traffic Volume (vph) 17 10 0 107 30 0 Future Volume (vph) 17 10 0 107 30 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) ' 90 100 Satd. Flow (plot) 1768 0 0 1863 1770 0 Flt Permitted 0 950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1768 0 0 1863 1770 0 Link Speed (mph) 35 35 25 Link Distance (ft) 2186 649 525 Travel Time (s) 42 6 12 6 14 3 Conti. Peds. (#/hr) Conti. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Growth Factor 100% 100% 10C% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (4/hr) 0 0 0 C 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 29 0 0 116 33 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 15.6% Analysis Period (min) 15 ICU Level of Service A K:1DUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands'\ T4 - Analysis!SynchrolBuild AM (2023) syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 6: Site Driveway & CR-36 Page 138 of Build AM (2023) 05/07/2018 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 17 EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 17 10 0 107 30 0 Future Vol, veh/h 17 10 0 107 30 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control RT Channelized Storage Length Free Free Free Free Stop Stop None - None - None 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 Mvmt Flow 18 11 2 2 2 2 0 116 33 0 Major/Minor Majorl Nilajor2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 29 0 140 24 Stage 1 - 24 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap -1 Maneuver Stage 1 - 116 - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 - 5.42 - 5.42 - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 - 1584 - 853 1052 - 999 Stage 2 - 909 NO Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - 1584 - 853 1052 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 853 Stage 1 999 Stage 2 909 Approach ES ;WB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 HCM LOS MI nor Lane/Mjor Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL Capacity (veh/h) 853 - 1584 HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile O(veh) 0.038 9.4 A 0.1 O 0 0 A 0 K:\DUR_LDEV\096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\Buiic1 AM (2023).syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 1: 1-25 NB Ramps & CR-34 Page 139 of: Build PM (2023) 05/07/2018 Lane Group 1-5 t EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT 140 Lane Configurations 4 ilt 4 Traffic Volume (vph) 51 116 0 0 154 122 140 1 95 0 0 0 Future Volume (vph) 51 116 0 0 154 122 140 1 95 0 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 1 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 100 100 100 100 Satd. Flow (prof) 0 1839 0 0 1753 0 0 1713 0 0 0 0 Flt Permitted 0 987 0.971 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1839 0 0 1753 0 0 1713 0 0 0 0 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 566 555 682 710 Travel Time (s) 8.6 8 4 15.5 161 Conti. Peds. (#/hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.83 0.66 0.92 0.92 0.86 0.88 0.69 0.25 0.71 0.92 0.92 0.92 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 237 0 0 318 0 0 341 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 48 1% Analysis Period (min) 15 ICU Level of Service A K:\DUR_LDEV1096214032 The HighlandstT4 - Analysis\SynchroiBuild PM (2023).syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 1: I-25 NB Ramps & CR-34 Page 140 of Build PM (2023) 05/07/2018 intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 8.2 EBL EBT EBR WBL \A./BT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 4+ Traffic Vol, veh/h 51 116 0 154 122 140 1 95 0 Future Vol, veh/h 51 116 l_'1 0 154 122 140 1 C Conflicting Peds, Mw 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized Storage Length { 0 Li - Non., None - None - None Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 83 66 92 92 86 88 69 25 71 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 61 176 2 2 1 1 0 0 179 139 203 4 134 0 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minor Conflicting Flow All 318 0 0 547 617 176 Stage 1 WO - 299 299 Stage 2 - 248 318 Critical Hdwy 4.12 - 6.42 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1242 Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % RIO 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 5.42 5.52 - 5.42 5.52 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 - 498 405 867 - 752 666 - 793 654 Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1242 - 471 0 867 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 - - 471 - 711 - 793 0 0 0 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 2.1 0 20 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT WBT WBR Capacity (veh/h) 575 1242 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.593 0.049 HCM Control Delay (s) 20 8 0 HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) C A A 3.9 0.2 K:1DUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\SynchrolBuild PM (2023) syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:blank 6/2912( The Highlands 2: 1-25 SB Ramps & CR-34 Page 141 of: Build PM (2023) 05/07/2018 Lane Group EBL EBT �a EBR 1NBL 4- WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SB4 k. 4\ t Lane Configurations 1 4. 4 Traffic Volume (vph) 0 163 128 42 241 0 0 0 0 34 1 96 Future Volume (vph) 0 163 128 42 241 0 0 0 0 34 1 96 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 100 100 100 100 Satd. Flow (prof) 0 1757 0 0 1848 0 0 0 0 0 1666 0 Flt Permitted 0.992 0.986 Satct Flow (perm) 0 1757 0 0 1848 0 0 0 0 0 1666 0 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 771 566 608 809 Travel Time (s) 11.7 8.6 13 8 18 4 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.81 0.86 0.82 0.85 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.81 0.25 0.93 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100'',/r) 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 350 0 0 335 0 0 0 0 0 149 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Intersectior Summary Area Type: Other Control Type Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 49 3% Analysis Period (min) 15 ICU Level of Service A K:1DUR_LDEV1096214032 The HighlandsiT4 - Analysis\SynchrokBuld PM (2023).syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 2:1-25 SB Ramps & CR-34 Page 142 of Build PM (2023) 05/07/2018 Intersection Int Delay s/veh �.0 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations f raffic Vol, veh/h 0 163 128 42 41 0 0 0 0 1 96 Future Vol, veh/h 0 163 128 0 0 0 0 1 96 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Free RT Channelized 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 Grade, % 0 Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop - None - None - None - None sib 0 0 0 0 0 Y Peak Hour Factor 92 81 86 82 85 92 92 92 92 81 25 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 201 149 51 284 0 0 0 0 42 4 103 Major/Minor Majorl Major. 'i nor2 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 350 0 0 662 736 284 Stage 1 386 386 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 0 Stage 1 0 - 4.12 - 2.218 1209 0 0 276 350 - 6.42 6.52 6.22 5.42 5.52 5.42 5.52 - 3.518 4.018 3.318 427 346 755 687 610 Stage 2 0 0 771 633 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - 1209 406 0 755 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 406 0 Stage 1 N ib 653 0 Stage 2 771 0 Approach EB WB H C M Control Delay 0 12 Minor Lane/Ma or Mvmt EBT EBR WBL WBT SBLn1 Capacity (vehil h) - 1209 - 605 HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) vie 1 - 0.1 - 0.247 0 12.9 A B 1 K:1DUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\Build PM (2023) syn Kimsey -Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 3: 3rd St. (CR-7) & Welker Ave. (CR-34) Page 143 of: Build PM (2023) 05/07/2018 la 4 — Lane Group BL EST EBR WBL \NBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations 4+ 4 r 4+ 4 Traffic Volume (vph) 48 122 64 12 96 225 75 132 27 142 84 45 Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane Width (ft) 48 122 64 12 96 225 75 132 27 142 84 45 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 G rade (%) 0% 0% o% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 150 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 100 100 100 100 Satd. Flow (plot) 0 1769 0 0 1848 1583 0 1800 0 0 1760 0 Flt Permitt-A 0 990 0.992 0.982 0.974 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1769 0 0 1848 1583 0 1800 0 0 1760 0 Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) 25 894 24 4 25 990 27 0 35 624 12.2 25 646 176 Confl. Peels. (#/hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Growth Factor 0.55 0.55 0.47 0.50 0.74 0.76 0.65 0.79 0.72 0.60 0.82 0.46 100% 100% 1 D0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 445 0 0 154 296 0 320 0 0 437 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type. Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Period (min) 15 Utilization 51.2% ICU Level of Service A K:IDUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\Build PM (2023).syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report nut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 3: 3rd St. (CR-7) & Welker Ave. (CR434) Page 144 of Build PM (2023) 05/07/2018 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 66.9 Intersection LOS Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h Future Vol, veh/h Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow Number of Lanes F EB t- ERR R 'ittB L. 4 48 122 48 122 0.55 0.55 2 87 222 0 1 t i 7 _, l NBL NBA NBR SBL SBT SBR 444 1 32 _1 L 1) /9 115 1 b7 n 7 4+ 112 84 45 142 84 4 060 0.82 0 46 237 102 98 (1 1 0 Approach EB NB SB Opposing Approach Opposing Lanes Conflicting Approach Left Conflicting Lanes Left Conflicting Approach Right Conflicting Lanes Right HCM Control Delay HCM LOS WB 2 SB 1 NB 1 98.2 EB 1 NB SB 1 269 D SB 1 EB 1 WB 2 43.8 E NB 1 WB 2 EB 1 93.2 F Lane NBLn1 EBLni WBLn1 WBLn2 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 32% 21Yo 0% 52% Vol Thru, % 56% 52% 89 0% 31% Vol Right, Sign Control Traffic Vol by Lane 12% 27% 0')A - Stop Stop Stop 234 234 108 100% Stop 225 17% Stop 271 _T Vol 75 48 12 0 142 Through Vol RT Vol Lane Flow Rate 132 27 320 122 64 445 96 0 154 0 225 296 84 45 437 Geometry Grp Degree of Util (X) Departure Headway (Hd) Convergence, Y/N Cap Service Time 2 5 1 7 2 0.814 9.724 Yes 374 7.724 1.078 0.401 9.063 9.908 Yes Yes 405 366 7.063 7.608 0.707 9.117 Yes 400 6.817 1.061 9.11 Yes 402 7.11 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.856 1.099 0.421 0.74 1.087 HCM Control Delay HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th -tile Q 43.8 98.2 19.1 E F C 7.2 14.8 1.9 31 93.2 D F 5.3 14.1 K:1DUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\Build PM (2023).syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:blank 6129/2( The Highlands 4: CR-7 & CR-36 Page 145 of Build PM (2023) 05/07/2018 Lane Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) kt. EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SEAL SBT SBR 4. 10 4 r 3 8 1 69 1 13 2 124 119 Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane Width (ft) 3 8 1 69 1 13 1 124 119 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 1900 •4 1 -fa 1 1900 1900 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 110 0 0 200 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 100 80 100 100 Said. Flow (prot) 0 1800 0 1770 1632 0 0 1861 1583 0 1840 0 Flt Permitted 0.991 0.950 0.999 0.993 Said. Flow (perm) 0 1800 0 1770 1632 0 0 1861 1583 0 1840 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 35 35 45 Link Distance (ft) 521 2186 1157 522 Travel Time (s) 14.2 42.6 22.5 7.9 Cont Peds. (Irmr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.75 0.58 0.25 0.66 0.25 0.69 0.50 0.76 0.91 0.50 0.67 0.25 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 22 0 105 23 0 0 167 131 0 106 0 Sign Control Ston Stop Free Free ntersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 26.2% Analysis Period (min) 15 ICU Level of Service A K 'DUR_LDEV0O96214O32 The Highlands\T44 - Analysis\Synchro\Build PM (2023) syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 4: CR-7 & CR-36 Page 146 of Build PM (2023) 05/07/2018 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4* it 4 r Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 8 1 69 1 13 2 124 119 7 r Future Vol, veh/h 3 8 1 69 1 13 2 124 119 Conflicting Peds, #1hr 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free F rLit 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RT Channelized • None - None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # - Grade, % - 110 - Non(° • None - 200 0 - - 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 75 58 25 66 25 69 50 76 91 50 67 25 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 Mvmt Flow 4 2 2 2 14 4 105 2 2 2 2 2 4 19 4 163 131 14 88 4 Major/Minor Minor2 M nor1 Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 30 1 289 90 298 291 163 92 0 0 1 Stage 1 118 118 - 171 171 Stage 2 183 171 - 127 120 Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 651 621 968 654 619 882 1503 Stage 1 887 798 - 831 757 - 2.218 • 1416 Stage 2 819 757 - 877 796 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 628 613 968 634 611 882 1503 - 1416 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 628 613 884 790 795 755 - 634 611 - 829 755 - 850 788 Approach EB eNB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 10.6 11 0.1 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLnit/BLnikNBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1503 - 660 634 818 1416 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.4 HCM Lane LOS A HCM 95th %tile O(veh) 0 - 0.033 0.165 0.028 0.01 0 - 10.6 11.8 9.5 7.6 A - B B A - 0.1 0.6 0.1 ICDUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\SynchrolBuild PM (2023) syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 5: CR-7 & Site Driveway Page 147 of: Build PM (2023) 05/07/2018 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBA. SBT Lane Configurations V 1. 4 Traffic Volume (vph) 60 0 245 103 0 129 Future Volume (vph) 60 0 245 103 0 129 Ideal Flaw (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 100 100 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 0 1788 0 0 1863 Fit Permitted 0.950 Said. Flow (perm) 1770 0 1788 0 0 1863 Link Speed (mph) 25 35 35 Link Distance (ft) 515 406 1157 Travel Time (s) 14.0 7.9 22.5 Conti. Peds. (#/hr) Conti. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0 92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100" : 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (4/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 65 0 378 0 0 140 Sign Control Stop Free Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 29.2% Analysis Period (min) 15 ICU Level of Service A K.tDUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\SynchrolBuild PM (2023) .yn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report ) ut:hlank 6/29/2( The Highlands 5: CR-7 & Site Driveway Page 148 of Build PM (2023) 05/07/2018 Intersection in Dela\t;Moyeament '3, 1 WBL WBR NBT NBR SEW SBT Lane Configurations te 4 Traffic Vol, veh/h 60 0 245 103 0 129 Future Vol, veh/h 60 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop RT Channelized - None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 Grade, % 0 245 103 0 129 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Free - None - None O D 0 - - 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow 2 2 2 2 65 0 266 112 2 2 0 140 lalorIMinor Minorl Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 462 ?yf L L 0 0 378 0 Stage 1 322 Stage 2 140 Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 558 719 Stage 1 735 OD 4.12 do - 2.218 - 1180 Stage 2 887 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 558 719 - 1180 OD Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 558 Stage 1 735 Stage 2 887 Approach WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 12.3 0 HCM LOS Minor Lane/ Ma'or Mvmt Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) B on n1 SBL SBT - 558 1'SO - 0.117 - 12.3 0 - B A - 0.4 0 K:'DUR_LDET096214032 The HighlandstT4 - Analysis\Synchro\Build PM (2023) syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report nut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 6: Site Driveway & CR-36 Page 149 of Build PM (2023) 05/07/2018 Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 'D 4 IV Traffic Volume (vph) 100 34 0 63 20 0 Future Volume (vph) 100 34 0 63 20 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 100 100 Satd. Flow (prot) 1799 0 0 1863 1770 0 Fit Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1799 0 0 1863 1770 0 Link Speed (mph) 35 35 25 Link Distance (ft) 2186 649 525 Travel Time (s) 42.6 12.6 14.3 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 146 0 0 68 22 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 17.3% Analysis Period (min) 15 ICU Level of Service A K: 1DUR_LDEVM96214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\Build PM (2023).syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report nut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 6: Site Driveway & CR-36 Page 150 of Build PM (2023) 05/07/2018 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.9 EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, vehlh Future Vol, veh/h 100 34 100 34 4 *I o 63 20 0 0 63 20 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 Grade, % 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow 109 2 2 2 2 2 27 J' 0 68 22 0 Major1 SaitatitiOE: 44:.xAld w..yV �:' •: Maior2 Mi nor i Conflicting Flow All 0 0 146 0 195 127 Stage 1 - 127 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap -1 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % - 68 - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 - 5.42 - - 5.42 - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 - 1436 - 794 923 - 899 - 955 Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1436 - 794 923 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 794 Stage 1 r - 899 Stage 2 - 955 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 9.7 HCM LOS Mi A nor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 794 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.027 HCM Control Delay (s) 9.7 HCM Lane LOS A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 1436 0 A 0 K:1DUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\Build PM (2023) syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:blank 6129/2( Page 151 of SimTraffic Performance Report Build AM (2023) O5/O8/2O18 1: 1-25 NB Ramps & CR-34 Performance by approach Approach EB W`B NB All Denied Del ?Vet S Total Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.2 3.1 1.3 28.7 9.5 2: 1-25 SB Ramps & CR-34 Performance by approach A « 'roach EB WB SS. All Denied DelNeh (s) Total DelNeh (s) 0.3 0.0 0.2 0.1 2.5 6.5 61.8 13.6 3: 3rd St. (CR-7) & Welker Ave. (CR-34) Performance by approach Denied Del/Veh (s) Total DelNeh (s) O3 1 10.6 10 t, .1 c 0.5 2,9 149 119 4: CR-7 & CR-36 Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied DelNeh (s) Total DelNeh (s) O1 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 4.1 5.2 0.1 0.7 2.7 5: CR-7 & Site Driveway Performance by approach Approach Denied Deg/Veh (s) Total DelNeh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 5.7 0.2 0.8 1.8 6: Site Driveway & CR-36 Performance by approach Approach EB \a B NB A l l Denied DelNeh (s) Total DelNeh (s) 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.2 4.4 1.0 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.4 Total DelNeh (s) 14.3 The Highlands Kimlcy-Horn SimTraffic Report Page 1 )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 152 of SimTraffic Performance Report Build AM (2023) 05/08/2018 1: 1-25 NB Ramps & CR-34 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR All Denied Oel/Veh (s) Total DelNeh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.3 0 1 0 3 02 3.5 2.9 1.4 0.3 32.5 30.5 22.6 9.5 2: 1-25 SB Ramps & CR-34 Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBL VVBT SBL SBT SBR All Denied DelNeh (s) 0.3 0.3 00 00 02 02 02 01 Total DelNeh (s) 4.1 1.5 6 5 6 6 68.5 100.4 43 8 13 6 3: 3rd St. (CR-7) & Welker Ave. (CR-34) Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR '' WBL VriBT kl BR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s) Total DelNeh (s) 0.3 0.. 0.1 0.4 0.5 2.8 10.7 11.3 8.4 10.7 13.6 4.1 3: 3rd St. (CR-7) & Welker Ave. (CR-34) Performance by movement C 7 142 1 16 1 04 16.3 Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.5 Total DelNeh (s) 11.9 4: CR-7 & CR-36 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied DelNeh (s) Total DelNeh (s) 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.0 01 0.0 0.8 0.1 0.2 0.2 4.4 6.7 2.5 5.6 3.9 2.5 0.2 0.1 0.6 0.7 0.1 4: CR-7 & CR-36 Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 Total DelNeh (s) 2.7 5: CR-7 & Site Driveway Performance by movement Movement WBL NBT NBR SBT All Denied DelNeh (s) Total DelNeh (s) 01 0 1 0 5.7 03 131 08 6: Site Driveway & CR-36 Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBT NBL Al Denied Del/Veh (s) Total DelNeh (s) 0.l 0.4 1 The Highlands Kimley-Horn SimTraffic. Report Page 1 nut:blank 6/2912( Page 153 of: SimTraffic Performance Report Build PM (2023) O5/O8/2O18 1: 1-25 NB Ramps & CR-34 Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB All Denied Del/Veh (s) Total Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0 3 03 0.2 2.1 1.5 7.9 3.8 2:1-25 SB Ramps & CR-34 Performance by approach Approach EB 'NB SB All Denied DelNeh (s) Total DelNeh (s) 0.3 1.5 0.0 L L 02 58 0.1 2.6 3: 3rd St. (CR-7) & Welker Ave. (CR-34) Performance by approach tspproach EB WB NB SB All Denied DelNeh (s) Total DelNeh (s) 03 21 02 03 0.9 114 65 104 10.2 93 4: CR-7 & CR-36 Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied DelNeh (s) Total Del/Veh Cs) 03 0.1 01 17 5: CR-7 & Site Driveway Performance by approach Approach WB NB SB All Denied DelNeh (s) Total DelNeh (s) 01 03 00 02 63 12 06 16 6: Site Driveway & CR-36 Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB All Denied Del/Veh (s) Total DelNeh (s) Total Network Performance 01 c 1 47 10 Denied Del/Veh (s) Total DelNeh (s) 0.5 7.0 The Highlands Kimley-Horn SimTraffic Report Page 1 )llt:hklllk 6/29/2( Page 154 of SimTraffic Performance Report Build PM (2023) 05/08/2018 1: 1-25 NB Ramps & CR-34 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR NBL NBT Denied DelNeh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.3 0 4 0.2 0.2 Total DelNeh (s) 2.6 1.9 2.2 0.6 9.4 9.1 5.7 3.8 2: 1-25 SB Ramps & CR-34 Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT SBL SBT SBR All Denied DelNeh (s) 0.3 0.2 00 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 Total DelNeh (s) 2.1 0.7 2.8 2.1 8.3 11.5 4.8 2.6 3: 3rd St. (CR-7) & Welker Ave. (CR-34) Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s) Total DelNeh (s) 0.2 0.D ? 0.9 0.7 3.0 0.2 0.2 0 3 0 4 0.3 0 3 10.0 11.9 11.3 8.1 7.8 5.8 9.6 11.6 6.9 10.1 10.5 9 9 3: 3rd St. (CR-7) & Welker Ave. (CR-34) Performance by movement Denied DelNeh (s) 0.9 Total DelNeh (s) 9.3 4: CR-7 & CR-36 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s) Total DelNeh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 5.0 7.9 5.0 5.6 0.9 2.1 1.4 0.7 1.0 1.6 4: CR-7 & CR-36 Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 Total DelNeh (s) 1.7 5: CR-7 & Site Driveway Performance by movement Movement WBL N B T N B R SBT All Denied Del/Veh (s) Total DelNeh (s) 0.1 0.3 0.3 6.3 1.4 0.6 1.6 6: Site Driveway & CR-36 Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBT NBL All Denied DelNeh (s) Total DelNeh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 1.1 1.0 0.1 4.7 1.0 The Highlands Kimley-Horn SimTraffic Report Page 1 )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 155 of Appendix H: Synchro & SimTraffic Output: Background (2040) )ut blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 1: 1-25 NB Ramps & CR-34 Page 156 of Background AM (2040) 05/07/2018 t \* 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 1. 4* 61 261 0 0 489 69 195 4 146 0 0 0 Future Volume (vph) al 261 0 0 489 69 195 4 146 0 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 100 100 100 100 Satd. Flow @rat) 0 1846 0 0 1831 0 0 1709 0 0 0 0 Flt Permitted 0.991 0.973 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1846 0 0 1831 0 0 1709 0 0 0 0 Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) 45 566 86 45 555 8.4 30 682 15.5 30 710 161 Conti. Peds. (#/hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 350 0 0 607 0 0 375 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.0% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 K:IDUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\Background AM (2040) syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 1: 1-25 NB Ramps & CR-34 Page 15 7 of Background AM (2040) O5: C 7 2018 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 28.I EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h Future Vol, veh/h Conflicting Peds. 4/hr Sign Control RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # - 61 61 0 Free 261 0 261 0 0 0 Free Free - None 0 0 0 Free 489 69 195 4 146 489 69 195 4 146 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free Stop Stop Stop - None - - None .11 0 0 0 Stop 0 0 0 Stop 0 0 0 Stop None 0 0 0 Grade, % - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 Mvmt Flow 66 284 Major/Minor Majorl Conflicting Flow All 607 Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 971 Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % 0 - 0 0 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 532 75 212 4 159 0 0 0 Major2 0 0 0 Minor1 0 985 416 569 6.42 5.42 5.42 - 3.518 - 275 - 666 - 566 1023 284 416 607 6.52 6.22 552 5.52 - 4.018 3.318 236 755 592 486 - 92 2 0 0 92 2 0 92 2 0 Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 971 - 253 0 755 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 253 612 566 0 0 0 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 1.7 0 99.4 HCM LOS F Minot Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT WBT WBR Capacity (veh/h) 354 971 HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.059 0.068 99A 9 0 F A A 13.2 0.2 K: 1DUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro1Background AM (2040) syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:hHank 6/29/2( The Highlands 2: 1-25 SB Ramps & CR-34 Page 158 of Background AM (2040) 05/07/2018 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 4. Traffic Volume (vph) 0 163 270 343 341 0 0 0 0 157 8 57 Future Volume (vph) 0 163 270 343 341 0 0 0 0 157 8 57 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0"/0 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 100 100 100 100 Satd. Flow (prof) 0 1706 0 0 1818 0 0 0 0 0 1736 0 Flt Permitted 0 976 0 966 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1706 0 0 1818 0 0 0 0 0 1736 0 Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) 45 45 30 30 771 566 608 809 Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Conti. Bikes (1//hr) Peak Hour Factor Growth Factor 11 7 8.6 13 8 18.4 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0 92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 470 0 0 744 0 0 0 0 0 242 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.7% Analysis Period (min) 15 ICU Level of Service E K:1DUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\Background AM (2040) syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )utblank 6129/2( The Highlands 2: 1-25 SB Ramps & CR-34 Page 1 9 of Background AM (2040) 05/07/2018 Intersection Int Delay s/veh 1 10.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT VVBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h Future Von veh/h Conflicting Peds, /t/hr Sign Control RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow 1+ 0 163 0 163 0 0 Free Free 92 2 0 tilajor/Minor Major/ Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap -1 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver Mov Cap -2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 0 0 0 Approach EB 270 270 0 Free None 343 343 0 Free 4+ 341 0 0 0 0 157 8 341 0 0 0 0 157 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop None - - None - - o - 0 - - - 0 0 0 - - 0 0 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 177 293 373 371 0 0 0 0 171 9 Major2 0 0 471 4.12 - 2.218 - 1091 - 1091 WB 0 0 0 Minor2 1440 1116 324 6.42 5.42 57 57 0 Stop None 92 2 62 1587 371 1116 471 6.52 6.22 552 5.42 5.52 - 3 518 4.018 3.318 - 146 108 675 313 283 733 560 - 83 83 178 733 SB 0 675 0 0 0 HCM Control Delay s 0 H {A1 L O S S 648.7 F \lli nor Lane/Major Mvmt EBT EBR WBL WBT SBLn1 - Capacity (veh/h) - 1091 - 108 HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS - 0.34 2 10 B - 2.234 S 648.7 A F HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) Notes - 15 21 --: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s : Computation Not Defined ' All major volume in platoon K DUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands`T4 - Analysis\Synchro\Background AM (2040).syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 3: 3rd St. (CR-i) & Welker Ave. (CR-34) Pale 161) or Background AM (2040) 05/07/2018 Lane Group 1 1 r EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NIBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 33 Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane Width (ft) .s* a r 4+ 4 255 86 34 291 75 148 65 10 146 151 61 33 255 86 34 291 75 148 65 10 146 151 61 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted 0 0 100 0 1798 0 996 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 1853 0 995 150 0 1 0 100 1583 0 1792 0 968 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 1784 0 0.980 Said. Flow (perm) 0 1798 0 0 1853 1583 0 1792 0 0 1784 0 Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) 25 25 35 25 894 990 624 646 Travel Time (s) Cont Peds. (#/hr) Cord!. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Growth Factor 24.4 27 0 1 -22 176 1 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Sign Control 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0 406 Stop {01% 0 0 353 Stop 0% 82 0 243 Stop 0°/a 0 0 389 0 Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type Unsignalized I ntersection Capacity Utilization 68.2% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 K.IDUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\Background AM (2040).syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 3: 3rd St. (CR7) & Welker Ave. (CR-34) Page 161 of Background AM (2040) 05/07/2018 Intersection .ti Intersection Delay s/veh Intersection LOS E Movement EBL EBT EBR VJBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h Future Vol, veh/h Peak Hour Factor Heavy Veh Iles, % Mvmt Flow Number of Lanes 33 33 0 92 2 36 0 4 255 255 0.92 2 277 1 86 86 0.92 2 93 0 34 34 0.92 2 37 0 291 75 291 75 0.92 0.92 2 L 316 82 1 1 4 148 65 10 146 148 65 10 146 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 2 2 2 2 161 71 11 159 0 1 0 0 4 151 61 151 61 0.92 0.92 2 2 164 66 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach Opposing Lanes Conflicting Approach Left Conflicting Lanes Left Conflicting Approach Right Conflicting Lanes Right HCM Control Delay HCM LOS WB 2 SB 1 NB 1 57 9 F EB 1 NB 1 SB 1 404 E SB 1 EB 1 WB 2 26 D NB 1 WB 2 EB 1 52.2 F NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 .W'BLn2 SBLn1 S 0.1 Vol Left, % Vol Thru, % Vol Right, % Sign Control Traffic Vol by Lane LT Vol Through Vol RT Vol Lane Flow Rate Geometry Grp Degree of Util (X) Departure Headway (Hd) Convergence, Y/N Cap Service Time HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th -tile Q 66% 9% 29% 68% 4% 23`Y0 Stop Stop 223 374 148 33 65 255 10 86 242 407 2 5 0.617 0 936 9.159 8 287 Yes Yes 393 439 7.244 6.336 0.616 0.927 26 57.9 D F 4 10.7 10% 0% 90% 0% 0% 100% Stop Stop 325 75 34 0 291 0 0 75 353 82 7 7 0.862 0.181 8.787 8 005 Yes Y� s 413 448 6.537 5.756 0.855 0.183 46 8 12.5 E B 8.5 0.7 41% 42% 17% Stop 358 146 151 61 389 2 0.904 8.364 Yf� s 432 6412 09 52.2 F 9.7 K:!DUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\Background AM (2040) syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report nut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 4: CR-7 & CR-36 Page 162 of: Background AM (2040) 05/07/2018 't t 4\ it IP I Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane Width (ft) 2 2 1900 12 4+ 2 2 1900 12 4 4 1900 12 145 145 1900 12 15 15 1900 12 15 15 1900 12 2 2 1900 12 69 69 1900 12 25 25 1900 12 2 2 1900 12 4 148 148 1900 12 6 6 1900 12 Grade (%) 0% 3% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted 0 0 100 0 1715 0.988 0 110 0 1 80 0 1770 0 950 0 0 0 0 100 1723 0 0 1861 0.999 200 0 0 1 0 0 100 1583 0 1850 0 0.999 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1715 0 1770 1723 0 0 1861 1583 0 1850 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 35 35 45 Link Distance (ft) 521 702 699 522 Travel Time (s) 142 137 13.6 79 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Growth Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 100% 100% 100% 100`% 10'3% 100% 100% 100"/0 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 8 Sign Control Stop 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'J% 0 158 32 Stop 0 0 77 Free 27 0 170 0 Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 311% Analysis Period (min) 15 ICU Level of Service A K:IDUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\Background AM (2040) syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:hlank 6/29/2( The Highlands 4: CR-7 & CR-36 Page 163 of Background AM (2040) 05/07/2018 Intersection lnt Delay siveh 4.8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT *BR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4. 11 I 4 r 4 Traffic Vol, veh/h 2 2 4 145 15 15 2 69 25 2 148 6 Future Vol, veh/h 2 2 4 145 15 15 2 69 25 2 148 6 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - - None - None - None Storage Length - - 110 - - - 200 - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % 0 - 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 2 2 4 158 16 16 2 75 27 2 161 7 Major/Minor Minor2 Minorl Major 1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 264 247 164 251 251 75 167 0 0 75 0 0 Stage 1 168 168 - 79 79 - Stage 2 96 79 - 172 172 - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 6 12 5.52 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5 52 - 6.12 5.52 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3 318 3.518 4.018 3 318 2 218 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 689 655 881 702 652 986 1411 - - 1524 Stage 1 834 759 - 930 829 Stage 2 911 829 - 830 756 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 663 653 881 695 650 986 1411 - - 1524 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 663 653 695 650 - Stage 1 832 758 - 928 827 - - - Stage 2 877 827 823 755 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 9.8 HC M1 LOS A 11.4 B 0.2 0-1 Minor Lane/Ma or Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1411 - 753 695 783 1524 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 - - 0.012 0.227 0 042 0 001 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.6 0 - 9.8 11.7 9.8 7.4 0 HCM Lane LOS A A - A B A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 0.9 0.1 0 K:\DUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\Background AM (2040) syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 1: 1-2 5 NB Ramps & CR-34 Page 164 of Background PM (2040) 05/07/2018 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 4 Traffic Volume (vph) 38 186 0 0 243 201 117 2 157 0 0 Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane Width (ft) 38 186 0 0 243 201 117 2 157 0 0 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 lL Grade (%) 0% 0% 00/0 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 100 100 100 100 Said. Flow (prot) 0 1848 0 0 1749 0 0 1683 0 0 0 0 Flt Permitted 0.992 0 979 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1848 0 0 1749 0 0 1683 0 0 0 0 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 566 555 682 710 Travel Time (s) 86 84 15 5 16.1 Conti. Peds. (#/hr) Conti. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Growth Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 243 0 0 482 0 0 300 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 63.2% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 K:IDUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\.Background PM (2040).syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report nut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 1:1-25 NB Ramps & CR-34 Page 165 of Background PM (2040) 05/07/2018 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 5.5 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h Future Vol, veh/h Conflicting Peds, #/hr Sign Control RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow 38 38 0 Free 92 2 41 Major/Minor Majorl Conflicting FIowv Ad 483 Stage 1 - Stage 2 Critical Hdwy 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1080 Stage 1 Stage 2 - Platoon blocked Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1080 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 4 186 186 0 Free 0 0 92 2 202 0 0 0 Free None 92 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Free 92 2 0 Major2 0 0 0 243 243 0 Free 0 0 92 2 264 de 201 117 201 117 0 0 Free Stop None - 92 2 218 92 2 127 Minorl 4, 2 2 0 Stop 0 0 92 2 2 157 157 0 Stop None 92 2 171 0 658 768 202 285 285 373 483 6.42 6 52 6-22 5.42 5.52 5.42 5 52 - - 3518 4018 3318 - 429 332 839 - 763 676 - 696 553 - - 411 411 - 730 - 696 0 839 0 0 0 0 0 0 Stop 92 2 0 0 0 0 Stop 0 92 2 0 0 0 0 Stop None 92 2 0 Approach EB WB • . __rs _. - _"G.fic-_._ • �L u a� ..• .. -4Vr.c..i.-d!-Mc NB HCM Control Delay s 1.4 HCM LOS U 17.6 Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT WBT WBR Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio 581 1080 0.516 0.038 HCM Control Delay (s) 17.6 8.5 0 HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) C A A 3 01 K:OUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\Background PM (2040) syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 2: 1-25 SB Ramps & CR-34 Page 166 of: Background PM (2040) 05/07/2018 c t •� Lane Group EBL EBT EBR \W/BL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane Width (ft) Grade (%) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted 0 0 1900 12. � 217 21,. 1900 12 0 to 0 0 100 0 1762 146 146 1900 12 69 69 1900 12 4 274 274 1900 12 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 1844 0.990 0 0 1900 12 0 0 1900 12 0 0 1900 12 1900 V' ha 2 2 190U 1900 12 0% 1 79 79 1900 12 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 100 0 0 0 0 0 1683 0 0.980 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1762 0 0 1844 0 0 0 0 0 1683 0 Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Confi. Peds. (#/hr) Conn. Bikes (#/hr) 45 771 11.7 45 566 8.6 30 608 138 30 809 18.4 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Sign Control 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Co 0% 0 395 Free 0% 0 0 373 Free 0% 0 0 0 Stop 0 C 14' Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 56 6% Analysis Period (min) 15 ICU Level of Service B K 1DUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\Background PM (2040) syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:hlank 6/29/2( The Highlands 2: 1-25 SB Ramps & CR-34 Page 167 of Background PM (2040) 05/07/2018 Intersection In! Delay s/veh Movement Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h Future Vol, veh/h Conflicting Peds, #/hr Sign Control RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade. % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow 3 2 EBL 0 0 0 Free 92 2 0 Major/Minor Major1 Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap -1 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver Mov Cap -2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 0 0 0 EBT EBR WBL WBT WAR NBL NBT NBR SBL 217 217 0 Free 0 0 92 L 236 146 146 0 Free None 92 2 159 69 69 0 Free 92 L 75 .J Major2 0 ;95 - 4.12 - 2.218 - 1164 - 1164 4 274 274 0 Free 0 0 92 2 298 0 0 0 Free None 92 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Stop 92 2 0 0 0 Stop 0 92 2 0 Approach EB HCM Control Delay, s 0 HCM LOS WB 17 0 0 0 Stop None 92 2 0 56 56 0 Stop 92 2 61 Minor2 763 448 315 6.42 5.42 5.42 3.518 372 644 740 343 343 594 740 SBT SBR 2 2 0 Stop 0 0 92 2 2 79 79 0 Stop None 92 2 86 843 298 448 395 6.52 6.22 5.52 5.52 - 4.018 3.318 300 741 573 605 0 741 0 0 0 SB 15.2 MEOW Lane/Major Mvmt. EBT EBR WBL WBTSBLn1 B Ln 1 Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 1164 - 500 - 0.061 8.3 0 15 - A - 0.2 K:\DUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\Background PM (2040).syn Kimley-Horn • Synchro 9 Report nut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands Background PM (2040) 05/07/2018 3: 3rd St. (CR-i) & Welker Ave. (CR-34) --Ow 4- k, t \* 1 Lane Group EBL EB T E BR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 4 r 4 4 Traffic Volume (vph) 67 201 105 19 ' 59 169 125 207 44 115 132 67 Future Volume (vph) 67 201 105 19 "59 169 125 207 44 115 132 67 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 150 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 100 100 100 100 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1776 0 0 1853 1583 0 1804 0 0 1776 0 Flt Permitted 0.991 0 Q95 0 984 0.982 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1776 0 0 1853 1583 0 1804 0 0 1776 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 35 25 Link Distance (ft) 894 990 624 646 Travel Time (s) 24.4 27.0 12.2 17.6 Confi. Peds. (#/hr) Conti. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100`%: 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parting (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 405 0 0 194 184 0 409 0 0 341 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 65.9% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 K 1DUR_LDEV\096214032 The Highlands\T4 - AnalysisSynchro‘Background PM (2040).syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 3: 3rd St. (CR7) & Welker Ave. (CR-34) Page 169 of Background PM (2040) 05/07/2018 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 49.9 Intersection LOS Movement E EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h Future Vol, veh/h Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow Number of Lanes Approach Opposing Approach Opposing Lanes Conflicting Approach Left Conflicting Lanes Left Conflicting Approach Right Conflicting Lanes Right HCM Control Delay HCM LOS Lane 67 67 0.92 2 73 0 EB WB 2 SB 1 NB 1 65.8 F 4+ 201 105 201 105 0.92 0 92 2 2 218 114 1 0 19 159 169 19 159 169 092 092 0.92 2 2 2 21 173 184 0 1 1 WB EB 1 NB 1 SB 1 20 C NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 WBLn2 SBLn1 4+ 125 207 44 115 125 207 44 115 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 2 2 2 2 136 225 48 125 0 1 0 0 NB SB 1 EB 1 WB 2 67 1 F SB NB 1 WB 2 EB 1 43.6 E 4+ 132 67 132 67 0.92 0.92 2 2 143 73 1 0 Vol Left '% Vol Thru, % Vol Right 7/0 Sign Control Traffic Vol by Lane LT Vol Through Vol RT Vol Lane Flow Rate Geometry Grp Degree of Utdl (X) Departure Headway (Hd) Convergence, Y/N Cap Service Time HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th -tile Q 33% 18"/0 11 /0 0 371'/0 55% 54% 89% 0% 42% 12% 28% 0% 100% 21% Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop 376 373 178 169 314 125 67 19 0 115 207 201 159 0 132 44 105 0 169 67 409 405 193 184 341 2 5 7 7 2 0.972 0.966 0.508 0 442 0.836 8.566 8.579 9444 8658 8.816 Yes Yes Ycs Y s Yt-Js 421 422 381 415 410 6.642 6 652 7 223 6.436 6 896 0.971 0.96 0.507 0.443 0.832 67.1 65.8 21.7 18.2 43.6 F F C C E 11 6 11.4 2.8 2.2 7.9 K:1DUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\Background PM (2040) syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report nut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 4: CR-7 & CR-36 Page 170 of Background PM (2040) 05/07/2018 4%it se— 4\- t \* Group EBL EBT EBR NBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR , SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane Width (fl) Grade (%) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Satd. Flow (pot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) ConB. Peds. (#Thr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Growth Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) Bus Blockages (#/hr) Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Sign Control 6 6 1900 12 13 1900 12 0% 'I • 4 11 4 2 80 21 4 205 140 11 98 2 2 80 2 21 4 205 140 11 98 2 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 0% 0% 0% 0 0 100 0 0 200 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 100 80 100 100 0 1813 0 1770 1606 0 0 1861 1583 0 1850 0 0.985 0.950 0.999 0.995 0 1813 0 1770 1606 0 0 1861 1583 0 1850 0 25 35 35 45 521 702 699 522 14.2 13.7 13.6 7.9 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0% 0% 0% 0 23 0 87 25 0 0 227 152 0 121 0 Stop Stop Free Free I ntersectian Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 32.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 K:IDUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\Background PM (2040) syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report nut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 4: CR- 7 & CR-36 Page 171 of Background PM (2040) 05/07/2018 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 2.7 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h Future Vol, veh/h Conflicting Peds, #lhr Sign Control RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow 6 6 0 Stop 92 2 7 Minor2 4 13 13 0 Stop 0 0 92 2 14 '4* 2 80 2 2 80 0 0 0 Stop Stop Stop None - 100 92 2 2 92 2 87 Minorl 0 0 92 21 0 Stop Fr None 0 4 =1 205 -1 205 0 Fr( None 4 11 98 98 L 0 0 0 0 F r cj_ Fr,_.. None 0 0 0 92 92 92 92 42 92 2 L L L L 2 23 4 .223 152 12 107 Majorl _Major2 n i! 2 92 2 2 Conflicting Flow All 376 Stage 1 132 Stage 2 244 Critical Hdwy 7.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 Follow-up 'dwy 3.518 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 581 Stage 1 871 Stage 2 760 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 558 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 558 Stage 1 868 Stage 2 734 Approach EB HCM Control Delay, s 11 5 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvrnt 364 132 232 6.52 5.52 108 372 365 - 232 232 - 140 133 6.22 7.12 6.52 - 6.12 5.52 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 564 946 585 563 787 - 771 713 713 - 863 786 557 557 780 711 946 567 567 769 838 NBL NBT WB 223 109 0 0 223 0 0 me 6.22 4.12 3.318 2.218 817 1481 MEP 556 817 1481 556 711 779 NB - 4.12 - 2.218 - 1346 - 1346 SB 08 NBR EBLn1WBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) . HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1481 0.003 7.4 0 A A 0 Orr - 58O 567 785 1346 - 0.039 0.153 0.032 0.009 - 11.5 12.5 9.7 7.7 0 - B B A A A - 0.1 0.5 0.1 0 K:IDUR_LDEV\096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\Background PM (2040)_syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report nut:blank 6/29/2( Page 172 of SimTraffic Performance Report Background AM (2040) 05/08/2018 1: 1-25 NB Ramps & CR-34 Performance by approach APPi9acti. EB ill Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.4 0.3 0.3 Total DelNeh (s) 3.7 2.1 24.2 8.8 2: 1-25 SB Ramps & CR-34 Performance by approach Approach EB VVB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s). Total DelNeh (s) 0.4 0.0 68.9 11.7 3.2 11.5 430.0 74.9 3: 3rd St. (CR-7) & Welker Ave. (CR-34) Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied DelNeh (s) 0.3 0.9 0.3 0.3 0.5 Total DelNeh Cs) 13.4 10.4 10.8 13.8 12.2 4: CR-7 & CR-36 Performance by approach 0.1 3.2 1.3 0.2 1.6 Denied DelNeh (s) Total Del/Veh (s) 5.0 5.6 0.2 1.1 2.7 Total Network Performance 5.2 Denied DelNeh (s) Total DelNeh (s) 39.1 The Highlands Kimley-Horn SimTraffic Report Page 1 )ut: blank 612912( Page 173 of SimTraffic Performance Report Background AM (2040) 05/08/2018 1: 1-25 NB Ramps & CR-34 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR All Denied DelNeh (s) Total Del/Veh (s) 00 0.0 0 1 0 1 0.3 03 03 03 57 3.3 23 0.7 27.1 26.7 20.5 8.8 2: 1-25 SB Ramps & CR-34 Performance by movement Movement EBT [BR WBL WBT SBL SBT SBR All Denied DelNeh (s) Total DelNeh (s) 04 04 0.0 0.0 68.6 727 69.3 11.7 5 2 2.1 11.3 11.7 430.7 432.6 427.8 74 9 3: 3rd St. (CR-i) & Welker Ave. (CR-34) Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied DelNeh (s) Total DelNeh (s) 0 0 0.3 05 05 02 0.3 02 0.3 0.3 04 14.0 13 9 11.5 12.4 11 6 17 10.4 12.4 6.9 13.1 15.2 12.2 3: 3rd St. (CR-7) & Welker Ave. (CR-34) Performance by movement Movement AU Denied DelNeh (s) Total DelNeh (s) 05 12.2 4: CR-7 & CR-36 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied DelNeh (s) Total DelNeh (s) 01 01 01 3 5.2 58 43 58 4: CR-7 & CR-36 Performance by movement 2 1 ` r `� 1 02 01 1 1 11 00 Movement AJI Denied Del/Veh (s) Total DelNeh (s) 1r 27 Total Network Performance Denied DeI'Veh (s) Total Del/Veh (s) 5.2 39.1 The Highlands Kimley-Horn SimTraffic. Report Page 1 )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 174 of SimTraffic Performance Report Background PM (2040) 05/08/2018 1:1-25 NB Ramps & CR-34 Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB All Denied Del/Veh (s) Total DelNeh (s) 0.0 0 1 0.3 0.2 2.5 2.4 8.8 4.2 2: 1-25 SB Ramps & CR-34 Performance by approach Approach EB WB SB All Denied DelNeh (s) Total DelNeh (s) 0.3 0.0 0.2 0.1 1.9 3.1 7.1 3.2 3: 3rd St. (CR-7) & Welker Ave. (CR-34) Performance by approach mach ES WB NB SB All Denied DelNeh (s) 0.3 1.7 0.4 0.3 0.1 Total DelNeh (s) 13.6 7.4 16.0 11.5 12.2 4: CR-7 & CR-36 Performance by approach Approach Denied DelNeh (s) Total DelNeh (s) EB WB NB SB All 0.1 3.2 1 7 7.2 5.1 0 5 Total Network Performance 1.7 1 1.6 a Denied DelNeh (s) Total DelNeh (s) 07 8.8 The Highlands Kimley-Horn SimTraffic Report Page 1 )ut:blank 6/?9/2C Page 175 of: SimTraffic Performance Report Background PM (2040) 05/08/2018 1: 1-25 NB Ramps & CR-34 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR AU Denied Del/Veh (s) 0 0.0 0.3 I- 1 -. 03 0.1 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s) 6 22 3.5 1 3 107 19.8 2 4.2 2:1-25 SB Ramps & CR-34 Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT SBL SBT SBR AU DeniedDel/Veh(s) 03 0.3 0.0 00 02 01 02 11 Total Del/Veh (s) 2 5 0.9 3.8 2.9 9.8 12.7 50 32 3: 3rd St. (CR7) & Welker Ave. (CR-34) Performance by movement Movement EBL EST EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied DelNeh (s) Total Del/Veh (s) 03 03 0.3 06 0.6 28 0.4 04 03 0.3 0.3 04 13.4 147 11.5 77 8.9 59 15.2 17.2 12.6 11.4 12.1 10.3 3: 3rd St. (CR-7) & Welker Ave. (CR-34) Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0 7 Total DelNeh (s) 12.2 4: CR-7 & CR-36 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s) 02 01 a I 40 01 04 06 06 35 0.2 0.1 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s) 53 83 45 56 87 25 14 04 04 19 1.0 0.2 4: CR-7 & CR-36 Performance by movement Movement All Denied DeI/Veh (s) Total DelNeh (s) 1? 16 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s) Total Del/Veh (s) 07 8.8 The Highlands Kimley-Horn SimTraffic Report Page 1 )ut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 2: 1-25 SB Ramps & CR-34 Page 176 of Background AM (2040) - with SB Ramps Signal 05/10/2018 Lane Group EBL EBT 7 ERR WBL t � WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SRO Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane Width (ft) Grade (%) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted 0 0 1900 12 1+ 163 163 1900 12 0% 0 0 100 0 1706 270 270 1900 12 343 343 1900 12 4 341 0 341 0 1900 1900 12 12 0 1900 12 0 0 1900 12 0 0 1900 12 157 157 1900 12 4 8 8 1900 12 57 57 1900 12 0°% 0% 0% 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 1818 0.596 o o 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 1 100 100 o 0 0 0 0 1779 1583 0.955 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1706 0 0 1110 0 0 0 0 0 1779 1583 Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 293 45 771 11.7 Yes Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 Growth Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) Bus Blockages (#/hr) Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases 100% 2% 0 100% 100% 20/0 2% 0 0 0% Yes 45 566 86 30 608 138 Yes 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 470 0 0 NA Perm 2 0% 744 NA 6 0% Yes 62 30 809 18.4 0.92 0.92 0.92 100`)i 100% 100% 2% 2% 2% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Perm 0% 180 62 NA Perm 4 Permitted Phases 6 4 4 Detector Phase 2 6 6 4 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) Yellow Time (s) All -Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio vlc Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay 120 19.0 75.0 83.3% 5.0 2.0 -2.0 5.0 Min 59.0 0.74 0.35 1.8 0.0 1.8 120 12.0 19.0 19.0 75.0 750 83.3% 83.3% 50 50 2.0 2.0 20 5.0 M i n Min 59.0 074 0.90 24.5 0.0 245 7.0 14.0 15.0 16.7% 5.0 2.0 7.0 14.0 15.0 16.7% 5.0 2.0 -2 0 5.0 7.0 14.0 15.0 16.7% 50 2.0 -2.0 5.0 None None None 10.2 10.2 0.13 0.13 0.79 0.24 62 7 13.0 0.0 0.0 627 13.0 K:IDUR_LDEV\096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\Background AM (2040)-SignalizedSBRamps.syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report �L�t:hlal�l: 6/29/2( The Highlands 2: 1-25 SB Ramps & CR-34 Page 177 of Background AM (2040) - with SB Ramps Signal 05/10/2018 Lane Group ESL EBT EBR WBL WBT v'v'BR NBL NBT NBR Sat SBT SB> E B LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio jalersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length. 79.4 Natural Cycle: 75 Control Type: Actuated -Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.90 Intersection Signal Delay: 21.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 83.7% Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. 18 A 19 40 691 1536 0 0 0 0.31 Splits and Phases: 2: 1-25 SB Ramps & CR-34 ....... 02 efr — 06 We sr 220 #590 486 976 0 0 0 0.76 Intersection LOS: C ICU Level of Service E 528 50.0 D 93 0 #226 37 729 100 228 257 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.79 024 K DUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\Background AM (2040)-SignalizedSBRamps.syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report aut:hlank 6/29/2( The Highlands 2: 1-25 SB Ramps & CR-34 Page 178 of: Background PM (2040) - with SB Ramps Signal 05/10/2018 't t \*. Lane Group EBL EBT [BR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations I 4 4 P Traffic Volume (vph) 0 217 146 69 274 0 0 0 0 56 2 79 Future Volume (vph) 0 217 146 69 274 0 0 0 0 56 2 79 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 100 100 100 100 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1762 0 0 1844 0 0 0 0 0 1777 1583 Flt Permitted 0.856 0.954 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1762 0 0 1595 0 0 0 0 0 1777 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 97 86 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 771 566 608 809 Travel Time (s) 11.7 8.6 13.8 18 4 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking Oft/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 395 0 0 373 0 0 0 0 0 63 86 Turn Type NA Penn NA Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 2 6 4 Permitted Phases 6 4 4 Detector Phase 2 6 6 4 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) Yellow Time (s) All -Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode Ad Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay 12.0 19.0 70.0 77.8% 5.0 2.0 -2.0 5.0 12.0 12.0 19.0 19.0 70.0 70.0 77.8% 77.8% 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 -20 5.0 Min Min Min 22.0 22.0 0.59 0 59 0.37 0.40 5.8 7.8 0.0 0.0 5.8 7.8 70 70 7.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 20.0 20 0 20.0 22.2% 22.2% 22.2% 50 50 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 -2.0 -2 0 5.0 5.0 None None None 9.3 9.3 0.25 0.25 0.14 0.19 12.3 5.0 0.0 0.0 12.3 5.0 K:1DUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\Background PM (2O4O)-SignalizedSBRamps syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 2: 1-25 SB Ramps & CR-34 Page 179 of Background PM (2040) - with SB Ramps Signal 05/10/2018 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBP LOS A A B A Approach Delay 5.8 Approach LOS A Queue Length 50th (ft) 32 Queue Length 95th (ft) 76 Internal Link Dist (ft) 691 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 1762 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 Reduced vlc; Ratio 0.22 Intersection Summary A 44 ar 528 8.1 A 9 0 32 23 729 100 721 693 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.09 012 Area Type. Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 37.2 Natural Cycle: 40 Control Type Actuated -Uncoordinated Maximum vlc Ratio: 0.40 Intersection Signal Delay: 7.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.9% Analysis Period (min) 15 Intersection LOS: A ICU Level of Service B Splits and Phases: 2: I-25 SB Ramps & CR-34 K:\DUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\Background PM (2O4O)-SignalizedSBRamps.syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report ) ut : h l a n k 6/29/2( Page 180 of: Appendix I: Synchro & SimTraffic Output: Build -out (2040) n it:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 1: 1-25 NB Ramps & CR-34 Page 181 of Build AM (2040) 05/07/2018 4-- t /4* \* 4/ Lane Group EBL E.BT EBR WBL V1BT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 1+ 4 Traffic Volume (vph) 103 267 0 0 491 69 215 4 146 0 0 0 Future Volume (vph) 103 267 0 0 491 69 215 4 146 0 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 100 100 100 100 Said. Flow (prot) 0 1837 0 0 1831 0 0 1711 0 0 0 0 FR Permitted 0 986 0.971 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1837 0 0 1831 0 0 1711 0 0 0 0 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 566 555 682 710 Travel Time (s) 8 6 8.4 15.5 16.1 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 t r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 402 0 0 609 0 0 397 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.8% Analysis Period (min) 15 ICU Level of Service D K:\DUR_LDEV\096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\Build AM (2040).syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 1: 1-25 NB Ramps & CR-34 Paw 182 al Build AM (2040) 05/07/2018 Intersection Int Delay sr/veh 61.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 Traffic Vol, veh/h 103 267 0 0 491 69 215 4 146 0 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 103 267 0 0 491 69 215 4 146 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage. # Grade, % Free - Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop - None - - None 0 0 0 0 - None 0 0 Stop - None 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 Mvmt Flow 112 290 2 2 2 0 0 534 2 2 2 2 75 234 4 159 2 2 2 0 0 0 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 609 0 0 1085 1123 290 Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 970 Stage 1 - 514 514 0 0 0 0 - 571 609 - - 6.42 6.52 6.22 - 5.42 5.52 - - 5.42 5.52 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 - 240 206 749 - 600 535 Stage 2 0 0 - - 565 485 Platoon blocked 0/0 Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 970 - - 207 0 749 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - --207 0 Stage 1 - 517 0 Stage 2 565 0 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay s 2.6 0 214.6 HCM LOS F M inor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn.I EBL EBT WBT WBR Capacity (veh/h) 293 970 HCM Lane VIC Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) Notes 1.354 0.115 214.6 9.2 1) F A A 20.3 0.4 Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined All major \./plume in platoon K:\DUR_LDEV\096214032 The Highiands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\Build AM (2040).syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report nut:hlank 6/29/2( The Highlands 2: 1-25 SB Ramps & CR-34 Page 183 of Build AM (2040) 05/07/2018 c t tfr Lane Group EBL EST [ER WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations I+ 4 414 Traffic Volume (vph) 0 211 331 343 363 0 0 0 0 157 8 71 Future Volume (vph) 0 211 331 343 363 0 0 0 0 157 8 71 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 100 100 100 100 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1708 0 0 1818 0 0 0 0 0 1731 0 Flt Permitted 0.976 0.968 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1708 0 0 1818 0 0 0 0 0 1731 0 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 771 566 608 809 Travel Time (s) 11.7 8.6 13.8 18.4 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Conti. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 589 0 0 768 0 0 0 0 0 257 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop In ersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 92.9% Analysis Period (min) 15 ICU Level of Service F K:\DUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\Busld AM (2040).syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:hlank 6/29/2( The Highlands 2: 1-25 SB Ramps & CR-34 Page 184 of Build AM (2040) 05/07/2018 Intersection I nt Delay s/veh 151.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Free RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % - Peak Hour Factor 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 Mvmt Flow 0 Major/Minor Major1 Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 4 211 331 343 363 211 331 343 363 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Free - None - - 0 0 92 2 229 _ 0 0 92 92 92 2 2 360 373 395 0 0 0 Free None 92 2 0 Major2 0 0 589 0 0 - 4.12 Follow-up Hdwy - 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 0 - - 986 Stage 1 0 Stage 2 0 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver Mov Cap -2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 - 986 0 0 0 0 0 0 Stop 92 2 0 0 0 0 Stop 0 92 2 0 0 0 0 Stop None 92 2 0 157 157 0 Stop 8 8 0 Stop 0 0 92 92 2 2 171 9 Minor2 71 71 0 Stop None 92 2 77 1549 1729 395 1140 1140 409 589 6.42 6.52 6.22 542 5.52 5.42 5.52 - 3.518 4.018 3.318 - 125 88 654 305 276 671 495 - 65 65 - 157 671 AO 0 654 0 0 0 Approach LB WB SB HCM Control Delay s 0 5 :3 $ 935.2 LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBT EBR WBL WBT SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) - 986 - 90 HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) Notes - 0.378 - 2.85 - 10.9 0$ 935.2 B A F - 1.8 - 24.7 Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon K:IDUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\Build AM (2040).syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )Ut:hlank 6/29/2( The Highlands 3: 3rd St. (CR-7) & Welker Ave. (CR-34) Page 185 of Build AM (2040) 05/07/2018 t P Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBIl Lane Configurations 4 4 r 4 4 Traffic Volume (vph) 35 255 86 34 291 111 148 67 10 255 157 67 Future Volume (vph) 35 255 86 34 291 111 148 67 10 255 157 67 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 150 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 100 100 100 100 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1796 0 0 1853 1583 0 1792 0 0 1780 0 Fit Permitted 0.995 0.995 0 968 0.974 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1796 0 0 1853 1583 0 1792 0 0 1780 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 35 25 Link Distance (ft) 894 990 624 646 Travel Time (s) 24.4 27.0 12 2 17 6 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 Conti. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0 92 0 92 0.92 0.92 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100"/c 100% 10O% 100% 1OO% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#Ihr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 408 0 0 353 121 0 245 0 0 521 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.9% Analysis Period (min) 15 ICU Level of Service D K:1DUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\Build AM (2040).syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report nut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 3: 3rd St. (CR-7) & Welker Ave. (CR-34) Page 186 of Build AM (2040) 05/0712018 Intersection Intersection Delay s/veh 8O 7 Intersection LOS F Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4+ 4 P 4 4 34 291 111 148 67 10 255 157 67 Future Vol, veh/h 35 255 86 34 291 111 148 67 10 255 157 67 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0 92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Traffic Vol, veh/h 35 255 86 Mvmt Flow 38 277 93 37 316 121 161 73 11 277 171 73 Number of Lanes Approach 0 1 0 0 1 1 ( 1 0 0 1 0 ES WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB Opposing Lanes 2 Conflicting Approach Left SB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 HCM Control Delay 66.4 HCM LOS F EB 1 NB 1 SB 1 42 5 E Lane NBLn1 EBL.n1 WBLn1 WBLn2 SBLn1 SB 1 EB 1 WB 2 29.3 D NB 1 WB 2 EB 1 150.7 F Vol Left. `%; Vol Thru, % Vol Right, % Sign Control Traffic Vol by Lane LT Vol 66% 9% 10% 0% 53% 30% 68% 90% 0% 33% 4% 23% 0% 100% 14% Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop 225 376 325 111 479 148 35 34 0 255 Through Vol 67 255 291 0 157 R T Vol 10 86 0 111 67 Lane Flow Rate 245 409 353 121 521 Geometry Grp Degree of Uhl (X) Departure Headway (Hd) Convergence, Y/N Cap Service Time HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th -tile Q 2 5 7 7 2 0.635 0.957 0.874 0.273 1.233 10.172 9.247 9.681 8.894 8.526 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 357 396 378 407 427 8.172 7.247 7.381 6.594 6.593 0.686 1.033 0.934 0.297 1.22 29.3 66.4 51.9 14.9 150.7 D F F B F 4 2 10 3 8.5 1.1 21.3 KADUR_LDEV\096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\Build AM (2040).syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 4: CR-7 & CR-36 Page 187 of: Build AM (2040) 05/07/2018 - - t t I Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT ViBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 ) 1 4 r Traffic Volume (vph) 2 2 4 176 15 15 2 69 35 Future Volume (vph) 2 2 4 176 15 15 2 69 35 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 4 2 148 2 143 1900 1900 12 12 6 6 1900 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 110 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 100 80 100 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1715 0 1770 1723 0 0 1861 Flt Permitted 0 988 0.950 0 999 200 0 0 1 0 0 100 1583 0 1850 0 0.999 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1715 0 1770 1723 0 0 1861 1583 0 1850 0 Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 25 521 142 35 2186 42 6 35 1157 22.5 45 522 79 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 8 0 191 32 0 0 77 38 0 170 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type. Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 32.8% Analysis Period (min) 15 ICU Level of Service A K:1DUR_LDEV\096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\Build AM (2040) syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 4: CR-7 & CR-36 Page 188 of Build AM (2040) 05/07/2018 Intersection Int Delay cveh Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT *BR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4+ ) 'fir 4 Traffic Vol, veh/h 2 2 4 176 15 15 2 69 Future Vol, veh/h 2 2 4 176 15 15 2 64 35 4+ 2 148 6 113 r Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free F rt_ RT Channelized - None - None - - None F Fr - None Storage Length - - 110 - - - 200 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 0 0 Grade, % - 0 - 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 2 2 4 191 16 16 2 75 38 2 161 7 Major/Minor Minor2 Minorl Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 264 247 164 251 251 75 1-Y 0 0 75 0 Stage 1 168 168 - 79 79 Stage 2 96 79 - 172 172 - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - 4 12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 689 655 881 702 652 986 1411 - - 1524 Stage 1 834 759 - 930 829 - alb Stage 2 911 829 - 830 756 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 663 653 881 695 650 986 1411 1524 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 663 653 - 695 650 Stage 1 832 758 - 928 827 Stage 2 877 827 - 823 755 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control D_ lay 9,8 1 1 8 C 1 0 1 Mi nor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLnlY/BLniWBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1411 - 753 695 783 1524 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 HCM Control Delay (s) 7 HCM Lane LOS A HCM 95th %tile O(veh) 0 r - 0.012 0.275 0.042 0.001 9.8 12.1 9.8 7.4 A B A A 0 1.1 0.1 0 K:\DUR_LDEV\096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\Build AM (2040).syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:blank 6/2912( The Highlands 5: CR-7 & Site Driveway Page 189 of Build AM (2040) 05/07/2018 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations 'I 14 4 Traffic Volume (vph) 91 0 106 30 0 327 Future Volume (vph) 91 0 106 30 0 327 ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 100 100 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 0 1807 0 0 1863 Flt Permitted 0.950 Said. Flow (perm) 1770 0 1807 0 0 1863 Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Conti. Peds. (#/hr) Conti. Bikes (4 hr) Peak Hour Factor Growth Factor 25 35 515 406 140 79 35 1157 22.5 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 99 0 143 0 0 355 Sign Control Stop Free Free In tersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 28.9% Analysis Period (min) 15 ICU Level of Service A K:IDUR_LDEV\.096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\Build AM (2040) syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 5: CR-7 & Site Driveway Page 190 of Build AM (2040) 05/07/2018 Intersection Int Delay. slveh Mount Lane Configurations 22 WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SST 4 Traffic Vol, veh/h 91 0 10o 30 0 327 Future Vol, veh/h 91 0 106 30 0 327 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop 0 0 0 Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 Grade, % o - 0 - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 99 0 115 2 2 2 33 0 355 Major/Minor M nor,l Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 487 172 0 Stage 1 132 Stage 2 355 Critical Hdwy 6.42 6 22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 3 518 3 318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 540 917 Stage 1 894 0 48 0 - 4.12 Q L L I 1434 Stage 2 710 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 540 917 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 540 OD - 1434 Stage 1 894 Stage 2 710 Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 13.2 I' HCM LOS B Minor r Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRV BLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 11131 0.1 A 0 K:\DUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\Build AM (2040).syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 6: Site Driveway & CR-36 Page 191 of Build AM (2040) 05/07/2018 —0` a*.t "Da Lane Group E T ERR WBI_ WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations '+ 4 iitt Traffic Volume (vph) 29 1, 0 1 76 30 0 Future Volume (vph) 29 0 176 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1c)00 1900 1900 1900 1 90'n Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 1 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 100 100 Said. Flow @rot) 1798 0 0 1863 1770 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 Said. Flow (perm) 1798 0 0 1863 1770 0 Link Speed (mph) 35 35 25 Link Distance (ft) 2186 649 525 Travel Time (s) 42.6 12.6 14.3 Conti. Peds. (#/hr) Conti. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (# ihr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 43 0 0 191 33 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 19.3% Analysis Period (min) 15 ICU Level of Service A K:1DUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\Build AM (2040) syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 6: Site Driveway & CR-36 Page 192 of Build AM (2040) 05/07/2018 Intersection int Delay s/veh 1.2 Movement ._JBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations '�► Traffic Vol, veh/h 29 10 0 176 30 C Future Vol, veh/h 29 10 0 1k 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Ste) '34 RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 32 11 0 191 33 0 Major/Minor Majori Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 0 0 42 0 228 37 Stage 1 - 37 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg 1 191 - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 - 5.42 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 IMP Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - 1567 - 760 1035 Stage 1 - 985 Stage 2 - 841 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1567 - 760 1035 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 760 Stage 1 - 985 Stage 2 841 HCM Control Delay s 0 0 9 9 RCM L O S Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR V�JBL BT Capacity (veh/h) 760 155 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.043 HCM Control Delay (s) 9.9 - 0 HCM Lane LOS A - A HCM 95th %tile O(veh) 0.1 - 0 K:IDUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\Busld AM (2040) syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report nut:blank 6/29/2( Page 193 of The Highlands Build PM (2040) 1: 1-25 NB Ramps & CR-34 05/10/2018 ...) .0. N'ir c .4— k.. 4*\ t t \* i' 1 Lane Grow EBL [BT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 1+ 4 Traffic Volume (vph) 66 190 0 0 250 201 186 2 157 0 0 0 Future Volume (vph) 66 190 0 0 250 201 186 2 15 7 0 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 100 100 100 100 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1839 0 0 1751 0 0 1702 0 0 0 0 Flt Permitted 0.987 0.974 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1839 0 0 1751 0 0 1702 0 0 0 0 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 566 555 682 710 Travel Time (s) 8.6 8.4 15.5 16 1 Conti. Peds. (#/hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0 92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100°%% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 279 0 0 490 0 0 375 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Intersection Summary Area Type. Other Control Type. Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 69.1% Analysis Period (min) 15 ICU Level of Service C K:\DUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\Build PM (2040) syn Kimley-Hori Synchro 9 Report )ut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 1: I-25 NB Ramps & CR-34 Page 194 of Build PM (2040) 05/10/2018 Intersection lnt Delay siveh 11.5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 66 Future Vol, veh/h 66 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Free RT Channelized Storage Length 4 190 190 0 Free U 0 0 Free None 0 0 0 Free • 1+ 250 250 0 Free 4+ 201 136 2 157 201 136 2 157 0 0 0 0 Free Stop Stop Stop None - - None 0 0 0 Stop 0 0 0 0 0 0 Stop Stop - None Veh in Median Storage; # - 0 0 0 Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow 0 - - 0 - 0 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 72 207 0 0 272 218 202 2 171 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minorl 92 2 0 0 92 92 2 2 0 0 Conflicting Flow All 490 0 Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1073 Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1073 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 731 840 207 350 350 - 381 490 - 6.42 6.52 6.22 - 5.42 5.52 - 5.42 5.52 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 - 389 302 833 - 713 633 - 691 549 - 359 0 833 - 359 0 - Stage 1 - 659 0 Stage 2 Approach EB HCM Control Delay s 2.2 HCf\M'1 LOS Mi 691 0 NB 33.4 r, nor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT WBT WBR Capacity (veh/h) 485 1073 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0 773 0.067 HCM Control Delay (s) 33.4 8.6 0 HCM Lane LOS D A A HCM 95th %tile O(veh) 6 8 0.2 K:1DUR_LDEV\096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\Build PM (2040) syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:blanL 6/29/2( The Highlands 2: 1-25 SB Ramps & CR-34 Page 195 of Build PM (2040) 05/10/2018 ehr c t \•• nip EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1. 4 4+ Traffic Volume (vph) 0 249 186 69 349 0 0 0 0 56 2 127 Future Volume (vph) 0 249 186 69 349 0 0 0 0 56 2 127 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (96) 0% 0% 0% 00/C4 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 100 100 100 100 Satd. Flow (plot) 0 1755 0 0 1848 0 0 0 0 0 1664 0 Flt Permitted 0.992 0.985 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1755 0 0 1848 0 0 0 0 0 1664 0 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 771 566 608 809 Travel Time (s) 11 7 8 6 13.8 18 4 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Confl. Bikes ('ihr) Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 473 0 0 454 0 0 0 0 0 201 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.7% Analysis Period (min) 15 ICU Level of Service C K:\DUR_LDEV\096214032 The Highlands‘T4 - Analysis\Synchro‘Build PM (2040) syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 2: 1-25 SB Ramps & CR-34 Page 196 of: Build PM (2040) 05/10/2018 Intersection Int Delay s/veh 3 8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Free RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow 1 249 249 0 Free 186 186 0 Free None 0 - 0 - 92 92 92 2 2 2 0 271 202 Major/Minor Major1 Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 0 Stage 1 0 Stage 2 0 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 69 69 0 Free 4 349 349 0 Free I J - 0 0 92 92 2 2 75 379 Major2 0 0 0 Free None 92 2 0 0 0 473 0 0 - 4.12 - 2.218 - 1089 - 1089 0 0 0 0 0 0 Stop 92 2 0 0 0 0 Stop 0 92 2 0 0 0 0 Stop None 92 2 0 56 56 0 Stop 2 2 0 Stop 0 0 92 92 2 2 61 2 Minor2 901 529 372 6.42 5 42 5.42 127 127 0 Stop None 92 2 138 1002 379 529 473 - 6.52 6.22 5 52 5.52 - 3.518 4.018 3.318 309 242 668 591 527 697 558 282 0 668 282 0 Stage 1 540 0 Stage 2 697 0 Approach E B HCM Control Delay s 0 WB 1 1 SB 18.2 HCM LOS Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBT EBR WBL WBT SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) - 1089 - 471 HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0 069 - 0.427 8 6 0 18.2 A A C 0 2 - 2.1 K:\DUR_LDEV\096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\Build PM (2040).syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report nit: Klan k 6/29/2( The Highlands 3: 3rd St. (CR7) & Welker Ave. (CR-34) Page 197 of Build PM (2040) 05/10/2018 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBI Lane Configurations 40 4 r 4 4 Traffic Volume (vph) 74 201 105 19 159 292 125 214 44 187 136 71 Future Volume (vph) 74 201 105 19 159 292 125 214 44 187 136 71 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 150 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 100 100 100 100 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1776 0 0 1853 1583 0 1804 0 0 1776 0 Flt Permitted 0.990 0.995 0 984 0.977 Said. Flow (perm) 0 1776 0 0 1853 1583 0 1804 0 0 1176 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 35 25 Link Distance (ft) 894 990 624 646 Travel Time (s) 24 4 27 0 12.2 17 6 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Conti. Bikes (vihr) Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0 92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100`-'! Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 412 0 0 194 317 0 417 0 0 428 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 74.4% Analysis Period (min) 15 ICU Level of Service D K:\DUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro'Build PM (2040).syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 3: 3rd St. (CR-7) & Welker Ave. (CR-34) Page 198 of Build PM (2040) 05/10/2018 Intersection Intersection Delay. s/veh 83.9 I ntersection LOS F Movement EBL EST EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 traffic Vol, veh/h 74 201 105 19 159 292 125 214 44 187 136 71 Future Vol, veh/h 74 201 105 19 159 292 125 214 44 187 136 71 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 O92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow Number of Lanes 2 2 2 80 218 114 0 1 0 2 2 2 2 21 113 317 136 0 1 1 0 2 2 233 48 1 0 2 203 0 2 2 148 77 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach Opposing Lanes Conflicting Approach Left Conflicting Lanes Left Conflicting Approach Right Conflicting Lanes Right HCM Control Delay HCM LOS 4 1 NB 1 98 F EB 1 NB 1 SB 1 35 D SB 1 EB 1 WB 2 101 9 F NB 1 WB 2 EB 1 111 F Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 WBLn2 SBLn1 Vol Left, 33" �0 19% 11°/r 0% 17 /r Vol Thru. % 56% 53% 89% 0% 35% Voi Right, % Sign Control Traffic Vol by Lane LT Vol 11% 28% 0% 100% 18% Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop 383 380 178 292 394 125 74 19 0 187 Through Vol 214 201 159 0 136 RT Vol 44 105 0 292 71 Lane Flow Rate 416 413 193 317 428 Geometry Grp Degree of Util (X) Departure Headway (Hd) Convergence. YIN Cap Service Time 2 5 7 7 2 1.076 1.063 0.526 10.022 10.041 10.548 Yc-2s Yes Yes 366 363 344 8.022 8.041 8.248 0.796 9.756 Yes 375 7456 1106 9,934 Y►�s J 368 7 934 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 1.137 1.138 0.561 0.845 1.163 HCM Control Delay 101 9 98 244 414 111 HCM Lane LOS F F C E F HCM 95th -tile 0 13.9 134 29 5 8 149 K:\DUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\Build PM(2040).syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:hlank 6/29/2( The Highlands 4: CR-7 & CR-36 Page 199 of Build PM (2040) 05/10/2018 I ks t \* Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Slitt Lane Configurations 4 ' il* 4 r 40 Traffic Volume (vph) 6 13 2 100 2 21 4 205 174 11 98 2 Future Volume (vph) 6 13 2 100 2 21 1 205 171 11 (V. 2 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% o% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 110 0 0 200 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 100 80 100 100 Satd. Flow (plot) 0 1813 0 1770 1606 0 0 1861 1583 0 1850 0 Flt Permitted 0.985 0 950 0.999 0.995 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1813 0 1770 1606 0 0 1861 1583 0 1850 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 35 35 45 Link Distance (ft) 521 2186 1157 522 TravelTime(s) 142 426 225 79 Conti. Peds. (#/hr) Conti. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100"% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 +0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0/ Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 23 0 109 25 0 0 227 189 0 121 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Int ersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 33.4% Analysis Period (min) 15 ICU Level of Service A K:1DUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\Build PM (2040).syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:blanh 6/2912( The Highlands 4: CR-7 & CR-36 Page 200 of Build PM (2040) 05/10/2018 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 2.9 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h Future Vol, veh/h Conflicting Peds, #/hr Sign Control RT Channelized Storage Length 6 6 0 Stop 4 13 13 0 Stop 2 2 0 Stop None 100 100 0 Stop 110 t 2 2 0 Stop 21 4 21 4 0 0 Stop Free None 205 205 0 Free 174 174 0 Free None 200 11 98 2 11 98 2 0 0 0 Free Free Free - None Veh in Median Storage. # - 0 - 0 0 0 • Grade, °A) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow 0 - - 0 0 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 7 14 2 109 2 23 4 223 189 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 MNjor1 Conflicting Flow Al! 376 364 108 372 365 223 109 0 92 92 2 2 12 107 Major2 92 2 2 0 0 223 0 0 Stage 1 132 132 - 232 232 Stage 2 244 232 - 140 133 Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4 018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 581 564 946 585 563 817 1481 Stage 1 871 787 - 771 713 Stage 2 760 713 - 863 786 Platoon blocked, % - 4.12 2218 - 1346 Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 558 557 946 567 556 817 1481 - 1346 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 558 557 - 567 556 Stage 1 868 780 - 768 710 Stage 2 734 710 838 779 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 11.5 12.2 0.1 08 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Maior Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1481 - 580 567 185 1346 HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay Cs) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.003 - - 0.039 0.192 0.032 0.009 7.4 0 - 11.5 12.8 9.7 7.7 0 A A - BB A A A 0 - - 0.1 0.7 01 0 K:IDUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\SynchrolBuild PM (2040).syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report nut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 5: CR-7 & Site Driveway Page 201 of Build PM (2040) 05/10/2018 LaneGroup WBL WBR t NAT NBR R SBL Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) 60 0 383 103 0 200 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 100 100 Said. Flow (prot) 1770 0 1809 0 0 1863 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 0 1809 0 0 1863 Link Speed (mph) 25 35 35 Link Distance (ft) 515 406 1157 Travel Time (s) 14.0 7.9 22.5 Conti. Peds. (#/hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 65 0 528 0 0 217 Sign Control Stop Free Free Intersection Summary 60 0 383 103 0 200 Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 36.4% Analysis Period (min) 15 ICU Level of Service A K:IDUR_LDEV\096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\Build PM (2040).syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 5: CR-7 & Site Driveway Page 202 of Build PM (2040) 05/10/2018 Intersection Int Delay so,/E, h 1.2 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations liff 1+ 4 Traffic Vol, veh/h 60 0 383 103 0 200 Future Vol, veh/h 60 0 383 103 0 200 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 65 0 416 112 0 217 Major/Minor Minorl aiQrs Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 689 472 0 0 528 0 Stage 1 472 Stage 2 217 Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - 2 218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 412 592 - 1039 Stage 1 628 Stage 2 819 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 412 592 - 1039 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 412 Stage 1 628 Stage 2 819 Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 15.4 0 0 HCM LOS Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - 412 1039 HCM Lane WC Ratio - 0.158 HCM Control Delay (s) - 15.4 0 HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - C A - 0.6 0 K:1DUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\Build PM (2040) syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report nut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 6: Site Driveway & CR-36 Page 203 of Build PM (2040) 05/10/2018 Lane Group 4- EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1' 4 V Traffic Volume (vph) 165 4 0 103 20 0 Future Volume (vph) 165 :1 0 103 20 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 19OO 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 100 100 Satd. Flow (prot) 1820 0 0 1863 1770 0 Fit Permitted 0 950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1820 0 0 1863 1770 0 Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Cone. Peds. (#/hr) Conti. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Growth Factor 35 2186 42.6 35 25 649 525 12 6 14 3 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 100% 100% 100% 100% 100 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (4/hr) Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 216 Sign Control Free 0 0 0 0 0 0 r0' y 0 0 0 112 22 0 Free Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 20.7% Analysis Period (min) 15 ICU Level of Service A K \DUR_LDEV\096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\SynchrorBuild PM (2O4O).syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report nit:hktnk 6/29/2( The Highlands 6: Site Driveway & CR-36 Page 204 of: Build PM (2040) 05/10/2018 Intersection Int Delay silveh Movement EBT EBR INBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1+ 4 V Traffic Vol, veh/h 165 34 0 103 20 0 Future Vol, veh/h 165 34 0 103 20 0 Conflicting Peds, #lhr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 179 37 0 112 22 0 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 0 0 216 0 310 198 Stage 1 - - - 198 Stage 2 - - 112 Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - 5.42 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - 2 218 - 3.518 3 318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - 1354 - 682 843 Stage 1 - - 835 Stage 2 - - 913 Platoon blocked % - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - 1354 - 682 843 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - 682 Stage 1 - - - - 835 - Stage 2 - 913 Approach EB HCM Control Delay, s 0 10.5 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT E8R WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 682 - 1351 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay Cs) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile O(veh) 0.032 10.5 B 01 K:IDUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro\Build PM (2040) syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:hlank 6/29/2( Page 205 of SimTraffic Performance Report Build AM (2040) 05/08/2018 1: 1-25 NB Ramps & CR-34 Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB All Denied Del/Veh (s) Total Del/Veh (s) 00 0.4 0.4 03 5.0 2.9 49.2 17.6 2: 1-25 SB Ramps & CR-34 Performance by approach Approach EB WB SB All Denied DelNeh (s) Total Del/Veh (s) 04 0.0 673.0 113.1 3 Q 21.1 778.2 93.0 3: 3rd St. (CR7) & Welker Ave. (CR-34) Performance by approach Ap roadh EB WB NB SB All Denied DelNeh (s) Total DelNeh (s) 0 6 156 12.5 119 467 244 4: CR-7 & CR-36 Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied DelNeh (s) Total DellVeh (s) I1 �I 1 0.0 0.0 0.2 01 47 6.5 0.3 0.8 32 5: CR-7 & Site Driveway Performance by approach Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) Total Del/Veh (s) 0.1 66 0 l 03 09 0 -1 17 6: Site Driveway & CR-36 Performance by approach Approach EB B sNB All Denied DelNeh (s) 0 r► 0.2 0 1 0 1 Total DelNeh (s) 0.4 0.2 4.6 0.8 Total Network Performance Denied DelNeh (s) Total Del/Veh (s) 44 5 51 7 The Highlands Kimley-Horn SimTraffic Report Page 1 )ut: blank 6/29/2( Page 206 of SimTraffic Performance Report Build AM (2040) 05/08/2018 1: 1-25 NB Ramps & CR-34 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR All Denied DeI/Veh (s) Total DelNeh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.8 6.6 4.4 3.2 0.8 52.3 52.8 2: 1-25 SB Ramps & CR-34 Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT SBL SBT SBR All Denied DelNeh (s) Total DelNeh (s) 0.5 0.4 0 0 0.0 677 2 652 3 666.8 113.1 6.0 2.7 219 20.4 756.6 808.9 819.3 93.0 3: 3rd St. (CR-7) & Welker Ave. (CR-34) Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied DelNeh (s) 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.5 3.0 0.3 ,-, 0.2 0.6 0.6 0.5 Total DelNeh (s) 16.8 16.2 13.6 15.4 14 9 5.0 11.3 14.0 7.7 46.8 46.9 46.1 3: 3rd St. (CR-7) & Welker Ave. (CR-34) Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s) Total DelNeh (s) 0.6 24.4 4: CR-7 & CR-36 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBA Denied DelNeh (s) Total DelNeh (s) 0.1 0 1 0.1 0.0 0.0 3.9 7.0 2.9 6.7 7.9 4: CR-7 & CR-36 Performance by movement 4. 0.1 03 02 09 01 Movement Al! Denied DelNeh (s) 0 1 Total DelNeh (s) 3.2 5: CR-7 & Site Driveway Performance by movement Movement WBL NBT NBR SBT A l l Denied DelNeh (s) Total DelNeh (s) 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 6.5 0.4 0.2 0.9 1.7 6: Site Driveway & CR-36 Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBT NBL All Denied DelNeh (s) Total DelNeh (s) 0 0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.5 0.2 4.6 0.8 The Highlands Kimley-Horn SimTraffic Report Page 1 )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 207 of SimTraffic Performance Report Build PM (2040)05/08/2018 1: 1-25 NB Ramps & CR-34 Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB All Denied Del/Veh (s) Total DelNeh (s) 0.0 0.4 0 3 0 3 3.5 26 153 68 2: 1-25 SB Ramps & CR-34 Performance by approach Approach EB WB SB All Denied DelNeh (s) Total DelNeh (s) 04 0.0 0.2 0.2 2.5 3.7 10 7 43 3: 3rd St. (CR-7) & Welker Ave. (CR-34) Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/ Veh (s) Total DelNeh (s) 152 95 I`)4 235 134 4: CR-7 & CR-36 Performance by approach 0 9 163 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) Total DelNeh (s) 01 0.0 00 0 1 5: CR-7 & Site Driveway Performance by approach Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) Total DelNeh (s) 0.1 0.4 0.0 0 8 % 13 0.8 17 6: Site Driveway & CR-36 Performance by approach Approach EB 1,NB NB All Denied Del/Veh (s) Total DelNeh Cs) e 14 01 51 12 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s) Total Del/Veh (s) 06 11.7 The Highlands Kimley-Horn SimTraffic Report Pagel n it:blank 6/29/2( Page 208 of SimTraffic Performance Report Build PM (2040) 05/08/2018 1: 1-25 NB Ramps & CR-34 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR Ali Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0 4 71 Total DelNeh (s) 5.3 2.9 3.1 12 17 6 21 0 U.S 6.8 2: 1-25 SB Ramps & CR-34 Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT SBL SBT SBR All Denied DelNeh (s) 0.3 0.4 0 0 0.0 0.2 0.6 0.2 0.2 Total DelNeh (s) 3.3 1.3 5.2 3.5 15.0 30.0 8.6 4.5 3: 3rd St. (CR-?) & Welker Ave. (CR-34) Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied DelNeh (s) 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.9 0.8 2.9 0 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 Total Del/Veh (s) 16.3 15.8 13.1 10.0 10.4 9.0 22.0 25.2 19.7 19.1 19.0 15.6 3: 3rd St. (CR-7) & Welker Ave. (CR-34) Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.9 Total DelNeh (s) 16.3 4: CR-7 & CR-36 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied DelNeh (s) 0.1 0.1 01 0�_� 90 1� fTh • • 1 - Total DelNeh (s) 5.2 8.8 :3.2 7 3 8 7 19 1 2 2 8 0.8 0 -1 4: CR-7 & CR-36 Performance by movement Movement All Denied DelNeh (s) 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 2.4 5: CR-7 & Site Driveway Performance by movement Movement WBL NBT NBR SBT All Denied Del/Veh (s) Total DelNeh (s) 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.3 8.7 1.5 0.7 0.8 1.7 6: Site Driveway & CR-36 Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBT NBL All Denied DelNeh (s) Total DelNeh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 1.5 0.9 0.1 5.1 1.2 The Highlands Kimley-Horn SimTraffic Report Page 1 )ut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 2: 1-25 SB Ramps & CR-34 Page 209 of Build AM (2040) 05/10/2018 a% t t r `► 1 r Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane Width (ft) Grade (%) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Satd. Flow (prot) Fit Permitted 0 0 1900 12 1 211 331 343 211 ._) 3 1 343 1900 1900 1900 12 12 12 0 0 100 0 1708 4 363 363 1900 12 0% 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 1818 0.539 0 0 0 0 157 0 0 0 0 157 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 12 12 12 12 12 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 100 100 0 0 0 0 0 1779 1583 0.955 4 8 8 1900 1900 12 1t 00,0 100 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1708 0 0 1004 0 0 0 0 0 1779 1583 Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Conti. Peds. (#/hr) Conti. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Growth Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) Bus Blockages (#/hr) Parking (#ihr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Yes 283 45 771 11.7 45 566 86 Yes 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0 589 NA 2 0 0 Perm 0% 768 NA 6 Yes 30 608 138 30 809 18.4 Yes 77 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0 92 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Perm 0" 'o 180 77 NA Perm 4 4 4 2 6 6 4 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (°/a) Yellow Time (s) All -Red Time Cs) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Leaci/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode Ad Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay 12.0 19.0 75.0 83.3% 50 2.0 -2.0 5.0 Min 72.4 0.78 0.42 2.5 0.0 2.5 120 120 19.0 19.0 750 750 83.3% 83.3% 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 -2.0 5.0 Min Min 72.4 0.78 0.98 39.5 0.0 39.5 7.0 14.0 15.0 16.7% 5.0 2.0 7.0 14.0 15.0 16.7% 5.0 2.0 -2 0 5.0 None None 10.0 0.11 0.94 92.5 0.0 92.5 7.0 14.0 15.0 16.7% 5.0 2.0 -2.0 5.0 None 10.0 0.11 0.32 13.0 0.0 13.0 K:IDUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - AnalysislSynchrolBuild AM (2O4O)-SignalizedSBRamps.syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:hlank 6/29/2( The Highlands 2: 1-25 SB Ramps & CR-34 Page 210 of Build AM (2040) 05/10/2018 etit k3/4- t ifre Lane Group EEL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR LOS A D F B Approach Delay 2.5 Approach LOS A Queue Length 50th (ft) 36 Queue Length 95th (ft) 64 Internal Link Dist (ft) 691 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 1398 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.42 RQ D 319 #669 486 i E 103 #226 40 729 100 785 192 240 0 0 0 c 0 0.98 0 0 0 0 0.94 0.32 section Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 92.4 Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated -Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.98 Intersection Signal Delay: 30.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 91.1% Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 2: 1-25 SB Ramps & CR-34 Intersection LOS: C ICU Level of Service F K:\DUR_LDEV1096214032 The HighlandslT4 - Analysis\Synchro\Build AM (204O)-SignalizedSBRamps.syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 2: 1-25 SB Ramps & CR-34 Page 211 of Build PM (2040) - with SB Ramps Signal 05/10/2018 -00 t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBI1 Lane Configurations 1 4 4 P Traffic Volume (vph) 0 249 186 69 349 0 0 0 0 56 2 127 Future Volume (vph) 0 219 186 691 0 0 0 0 56 2 127 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 100 100 100 100 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1755 0 0 1848 0 0 0 0 0 1777 1583 Flt Permitted 0.863 0.954 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1755 0 0 1608 0 0 0 0 0 1777 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 107 138 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 771 566 608 809 Travel Time (s) 11.7 8.6 13.8 18.4 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (96) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 473 0 0 454 0 0 0 0 0 63 138 Turn Type NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 2 6 4 Permitted Phases 6 4 Detector Phase 2 6 6 4 4 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) Yellow Time (s) All -Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode Act Efifet Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay 12.0 19.0 70.0 77.8% 5.0 2.0 -2.0 5.0 12.0 19.0 70.0 77.8% 5.0 2.0 12.0 19.0 70.0 77.8% 5.0 2.0 -2.0 5.0 Min Min Min 22.5 22.5 0.59 0 59 0.44 0.47 6.2 8.5 0.0 0.0 6.2 8.5 7.0 14.0 20.0 22.2% 5.0 2.0 7.0 14.0 20.0 22.2% 5.0 2.0 -2.0 5.0 7.0 14.0 20.0 22.2% 5.0 2.0 -2.0 5.0 None None None 9.5 9.5 0.25 0.25 0.14 0.28 13.6 5.3 0.0 0.0 13.6 5.3 K:\DUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\Synchro!Build PM (2040)-SignalizedSBRamps.syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:blank 6/29/2( The Highlands 2: 1-25 SB Ramps & CR-34 Page 212 of: Build PM (2040) - with SB Ramps Signal 05/10/2018 Lane Group EBL L EBT EBR t r� WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL sir SBR LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spiliback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Intersection Summary f{ A 42 95 691 1755 0 0 0 0.27 A 35 A 57 123 486 1508 0 0 0 0.28 528 E A 7Q A 10 0 36 31 729 712 0 0 0 0.09 100 717 0 0 0 0 19 Area Type Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 37.9 Natural Cycle: 40 Control Type: Actuated -Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.47 Intersection Signal Delay: 7.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 65.0% Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 2. 1-25 SB Ramos & CR-34 Intersection LOS. A ICU Level of Service C 04 4--- r K:\DUR_LDEV1096214032 The Highlands\T4 - Analysis\SynchrolBuild PM (204O)-SignalizedSBRamps.syn Kimley-Horn Synchro 9 Report )ut:hlank 6/29/2( Page 1 0 ADJACENT LAND OWNERS 300 FEET APRIL 11, 2018 STONE WILLIAM T 13256 HUMBOLDT WAY THORNTON, CO 802411186 GALLEGOS STELLA S FAMILY TRUST 1805 HIGHWAY 42 STE 100 LOUISVILLE, CO 800272588 TYAGI DINESH 3550 HUGHES DR MEAD, CO 805424550 ZORIC PAUL M 16811 ROBERT ST MEAD, CO 805424540 GRAHAM SETH T 16841 ROBERTS ST MEAD, CO 805424540 HARRIS ARTHUR 16871 ROBERTS ST MEAD, CO 805424540 CAMPBELL MICHAELA 16911 POTTS PL MEAD, CO 805424543 CHIARELLA GREGORY J 16941 POTTS PL MEAD, CO 805424543 GARCIA OCTAVIO GONZALEZ 16866 ROBERTS ST MEAD, CO 805424542 BREWSTER TROY ALAN 3509 COUNTY ROAD 36 MEAD, CO 805429729 VALE VIEW HOMEOWNERS ASSOC INC PO BOX 189 MEAD, CO 805420189 COLE MICHAEL A 145 FALCON OR MEAD, CO 805429786 FISHER PAUL A 141 FALCON CIR MEAD, CO 805429786 RIEPLER DANIEL 16821 ROBERTS ST MEAD, CO 805424540 SWORD ROBERT R 16851 ROBERTS ST MEAD, CO 805424540 MULLIN MICHAEL O 16881 ROBERTS ST MEAD, CO 805424540 FISK HARRY R 16921 POTTS PL MEAD, CO 805424543 MAXWELL ROGER A PO BOX 328 MEAD, CO 805420328 DIGSBY THOMAS W 16856 ROBERTS ST MEAD, CO 805424542 CASTELAZ MICHAEL A 17105 PRIMROSE LN MEAD, CO 805429758 SCALLON HUBERTJ 3505 VALE VIEW LN MEAD, CO 805424500 LYMAN TRAVIS T 3570 HUGHES DR MEAD, CO 805424550 KAGE BRANDON L 3510 HUGHES DR MEAD, CO 805424550 ESCOBAR JOSE R 16831 ROBERTS ST MEAD, CO 805424540 DILLE FAMILY TRUST 16861 ROBERTS ST MEAD, CO 805424540 OWEN MATTHEW G 16901 POTTS PL MEAD, CO 805424543 STK LIVING REVOCABLE TRUST 16931 POTTS PL MEAD, CO 805424543 MILLER BLAKE E 16961 POTTS PL MEAD, CO 805424543 HUMPHREY SHANE M 16846 ROBERTS ST MEAD, CO 805424542 )Ut blank 6/29/2( Page 2 DAVIS LESLEY R 16836 ROBERTS ST MEAD, CO 805424542 LEMONS JAMES T 147 FALCON CIR MEAD, CO 805429786 MURRAY JANICE L 3575 HUGHES DR MEAD, CO 805424555 DAVIS ALAN L 3314 COUNTY ROAD 36 MEAD, CO 805429728 LACONTE PASQUALE G 16729 COUNTY ROAD 7 MEAD, CO 805429743 FALAGRADY STEVEN M 151 FALCON CIR MEAD, CO 805429786 KROPP KARRIE J 16628 COUNTY ROAD 7 MEAD, CO 805429742 KOWALSKI BARBARA L 146 FALCON CIR MEAD, CO 805429785 POST MARTIN T 5920 BLUE CANYON DR RENO, NV 895236232 SMITH RONALD E 152 FALCON CIR MEAD, CO 805429785 THORNDIKE CHRISTOPHER 16826 ROBERTS ST MEAD, CO 805424542 VALENTINO CHRISTOPHER JOHN 3540 CLARK CT MEAD, CO 805424548 COYOTE RUN HOMEOWNERS ASSN C/O OVERLOOK MANAGEMENT 6860 S YOSEMITE CT STE 2211 CENTENNIAL, CO 801121409 MINCH JEANINNE K 154 FALCON CIR MEAD, CO 805429785 REINSCHMIDT KEVIN 148 FALCON CIR MEAD, CO 805429785 CLYNCKE LINDA LOUISE (75%INT) 3228 COUNTY ROAD 36 MEAD, CO 805429728 MUNOZ JESSE 3126 COUNTY ROAD 36 MEAD, CO 805429728 CHASE MANDDI C PO BOX 584 FIRESTONE, CC 805200584 BORST CARTER N 3530 HUGHES DR MEAD, CO 805424553 MAGNUSSON DONALD C PO BOX 127 MEAD, CO 805420127 JACKSON TOD M 3565 CLARK CT MEAD, CO 805424548 MELARA NOE E 673 NELSON PARK DR LONGMONT, CO 805037677 RICHARDSON TAMMY G 143 FALCON CIR MEAD, CO 805429786 BLESSING ANN K 149 FALCON OR MEAD, CO 805429786 VONALT FAMILY TRUST PO BOX 294 MEAD, CO 805420294 TEMPLE DELBERT PO BOX 254 MEAD, CO 805420254 LAREAU DANIELLE M 1805 HIGHWAY 42 STE 100 LOUISVILLE, CO 800272588 GLASSBURN JEFFREY L 156 FALCON CIR MEAD, CO 805429785 RANASINGHE ASELA G 150 FALCON CIR MEAD, CO 805429785 COULMORE LINDA S 144 FALCON CIR MEAD, CO 805429785 )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 3 0 HUGHES BENJAMIN L 607 FALCON CIR MEAD, CO 805429787 QUINBY JOHNNY L 136 FALCON CIR MEAD, CO 805429785 WALKER SHANE 130 FALCON OR MEAD, CO 805429785 VAUGHAN BRUCE PO BOX 159 MEAD, CO 805420159 JOHNSON RHONDA F 121 FALCON CIR MEAD, CO 805429786 JELSMA JOHN M JR PO BOX 667 MEAD, CO 805420667 DYER BERNICEJ P O BOX 575 MEAD, CO 805420575 MOSS PATRICIA A 139 FALCON CIR MEAD, CO 805429786 MILLER RANDY 132 FALCON CIR MEAD, CO 805429785 RICHARDS RYAN J 3560 CLARK CT MEAD, CO 805424548 DEJIACOMO DANNY L 140 FALCON CIR MEAD, CO 805429785 MEAD TOWN OF 441 3RD ST PO BOX 626 MEAD, CO 805420626 LINSCOTT THOMAS N PO BOX 518 MEAD, CO 805420518 REYNOLDS ROBERT W PO BOX 42 MEAD, CO 805420042 SHERMAN HERB C 135 FALCON CIR MEAD, CO 805429786 STEEL WILLIAM R 142 FALCON CIR MEAD, CO 805429785 BURWEL'L BARRY 238 SANDSTONE LAPORTE, CO 80535 HICKEY JOHN M 128 FALCON CIR MEAD, CO 805429785 JONES WILLIAM MICHAEL 117 FALCON CIR MEAD, CO 805429786 STEELE WILLIAM J SR 125 FALCON CIR MEAD, CO 805429786 COLBURN DAVID E JR 131 FALCON CIR MEAD, CO 805429786 BURNETTE DORI L 137 FALCON CIR MEAD, CO 805429786 )ut blank 6/29/2( Page 4 c The I lighiands — Maps of Adjacent Land Owners within 300 feet of Property April, 2018 )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 1 of I -I THE HENRY DESIGN GROUP AN41 • May 23, 2018 Mr. Christopher Kennedy Planning Director Town of Mead 441 Third Street PO Box 626 Mead, CO 80542 RE• The Highlands Mineral Interests Dear Chris, The following information is provided for the mineral owners and lessees. Further research will be completed prior to required notification in advance of the first public hearing. The Title Commitment provided with the Annexation and Zoning Amendment submittal indicates the following information as recorded for the property. A copy of the recorded documents is attached. 11. OIL AND GAS LEASE RECORDED MARCH 16, 1981 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 1852283 AND ANY AND ALL ASSIGNMENTS THEREOF, OR INTEREST THEREIN. NOTE: EXTENSION OF THE ABOVE LEASE AS CLAIMED BY AFFIDAVIT OF PRODUCTION WAS RECORDED OCTOBER 24, 1984 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 1986118. NOTE: THE PRESENT OWNERSHIP OF THE LEASEHOLD CREATED BY SAID LEASE AND OTHER MATTERS AFFECTING THE INTEREST OF THE LESSEE ARE NOT SHOWN HEREIN. 10. RIGHT OF PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE THEREFROM SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PREMISES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED MAY 04, 1883, IN BOOK 34 AT PAGE 58. 17. UNDIVIDED 1/2 INTEREST IN AND TO ALL OIL, GAS AND OTHER MINERALS AS RESERVED IN DEED, RECORDED FEBRUARY 25, 1958, IN BOOK 1497 AT PAGE 356, AND ANY AND ALL ASSIGNMENTS THEREOF OR INTERESTS THEREIN. )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 2 of I- I THE HENRY DESIGN GROUP ANI' A`#h44 •i4' dl'( dPi I; = ...,v 18. OIL AND GAS LEASE RECORDED DECEMBER 28, 2017 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 4363827 AND ANY AND ALL ASSIGNMENTS THEREOF, OR INTEREST THEREIN. NOTE: THE PRESENT OWNERSHIP OF THE LEASEHOLD CREATED BY SAID LEASE AND OTHER MATTERS AFFECTING THE INTEREST OF THE LESSEE ARE NOT SHOWN HEREIN. Please feel free to contact either me or Joe Stiffer with Prosper Lands and Development if you need additional information at this time. Best regards, ffefoi) Karen Z. Henry Principal )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 3 of rtes. amt... _ na.«,e.r. pa,.AMti MSS*. "wed other welts is AI I! ..ed bete of Catena.. !Ilse r entlEin 1• PLOW sod teasote. sod no: is %own. • ...S nl•t. /•1 enIN•.1., the f..itswie. /.•I .. CMliti Or Mad . NW Maio •t r.,ll .. I.•. 1...{.• . GO? NM et the earthiest quarter (1x44) et tisa ten (10) :INNS node ds4l d►t (6s) Teat of ihs 6* r. P., Wald Gratdellei.hseelhow with all :Mob and sates' slide in rely way connoted wilk-* to add prodsasi i�so��l_ldiee sixty (b0) Aortae of the capital shoet:��. ' tale liseer,oir 4�4'e ees (1) stare of the 'spite" 'took etrif:'. L 'btsl11.Q.M Coesosyl sod M =divided use ieentr• earth � 3 1 cs/lll�it''�:��.p3-,m+. et the eepdtai eta* et the6lgltlad Ditch Cesp.af i c suii't itiiid: soil bald is the sae of Oraoe N'. Cantos. Then. is k indiisl la this said alt of s tars& right to reesivs eater ender el %Ahem Cdarede Teter C meerrMsr Notelet, In the mama et 9 1 ' floe' the e.fes*spat Di As , all east; mad 'tepee !debts se nos exietlns !a a S ' � ':', t"s,t+,isi4ad a>te halt laltirset itt teed to all eU. Ras, end 1 a "7 adsorsIS' said 'mines, iflCT wit tto right to ono-�iait of Qslugr fouls ? sod bainaees 4t ae4tsd Vrepertir to )orals empa.salp declared to pass tatto the parties uf.theisesaad ports emit as ta:saato in caseraa, bet es joint testate, the Gu sip o .j tasir wedges, teed the bsirer sea assi4ts alt such a idfor forovr• with d ite.�;�teun.oue:t, sad w.Rt,let the tide to ti-.• a.,ee ..ai••• to any lies steultites br reeves K tb!! et odd . r O in the Mesta Colorado welter Ceesersa ner D*6heiata.-'s taws tlael:L4s,paosr A4�s abet Volnever .A.n.195a• 1. _.Yc-e?'J ' (Sr.AL) . Gp.. ` . (SEAL) (SEAL) ashweiresisi betsl ws this had dal et Fobrus7 enSOlfetratOe till• .•y. Was 'eras t�eret®• ��'ew a�•ewtwtao.e.l r 'et. °'it �e� tewW . lee.th tseekiwoeteseeetaWilltiatet..aminedesb )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 5 of Total Pages: 4 Rec Fee: $28.00 Carly Koppes - Clerk and Recorder, Weld County, CO OIL, GAS AND MINERAL LEASE "NO SURFACE OCCUPANCY" THIS AGREEMENT executed as the date acknowledged below, but effective as of December 18th, 2017, by and between, Richard E. Romeo, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Pete Gallegos, aka Perfecto Gallegos, deceased, AND Richard E. Romeo, as Trustee of the Stella S. Gallegos Family Trust, whose mailing address is: 1805 Hwy 42 #100, Louisville, CO 80027, as Lessor (whether one or more), and Incline Niobrara Partners, LP, whose mailing address is 1626 Wazee St., Ste. 200 B, Denver, CO 80202, as Lessee, WITNESSETH: 1. Lessor in consideration of Ten and No/100 Dollars ($10.00) and other valuable considerations, of the royalties herein provided, and of the agreement of Lessee herein contained, hereby grants, leases and lets exclusively unto Lessee for the purposes of investigating, prospecting, drilling, mining and exploring (including the exclusive right to conduct geophysical/seismic operations and other related activities) for and producing oil, gas and all other minerals, laying pipe lines, building drill sites, access roads, tanks, power stations, telephone lines, and other structures thereon to produce, save, take care ot treat, transport and own said products and for dredging and maintaining canals, constructing roads and bridges, and building houses for its employees, and, in general, for all appliances, structures, equipment, servitudes and privileges which may be necessary, useful or convenient to or in connection with any such operations conducted by Lessee thereon, or on any lands pooled therewith, the following described land in Weld County, Colorado, to -wit Townshiv 3 North, Range 68 West. 6t° P.M. Section 10: NW Comprised of 160.00 gross acres, more or less. This lease is a "No Surface Occupancy" Oil and Gas Lease. It is agreed and understood that Lessee, its successors or assigns shall not conduct any operations or locate any facilities on the surface of the leased lands. It is understood that Lessee, its successors or assigns shall not be allowed any access to the surface of the leased lands without written consent of Lessor. 2. It is agreed that this lease shall remain in force for a term of S veers from the effective date (the "Primary Term") and as long thereafter as oil, gas, or other minerals, or any of them is produced from said land or premises pooled therewith or drilling operations are conducted as hereinafter provided. If prior to discovery of oil, gas, or other minerals on said land, or on acreage pooled therewith, Lessee should drill a dry hole or holes thereon, or if after discovery of oil, gas, or other minerals, production thereof should cease for any cause, this lease shall not terminate if Lessee commences additional drilling or reworking operations within one hundred twenty (120) days thereafter. If at the expiration of the Primary Term, oil, gas, or other minerals are not being produced on or from said land or said pooled premises but Lessee is then engaged in drilling or reworking operations thereon, then this lease shall continue in fume so long thereafter as drilling or reworking operations are being continuously prosecuted on said land or on a drilling or spacing or operating unit which includes all or a part of said land, and drilling or reworking operations shall be considered to be continuously prosecuted if not more than one hundred twenty (120) days shall elapse between the completion or abandonment of one well and the beginning of operations for the drilling or reworking of another well. If oil, gas, or other minerals shall be discovered and/or produced from any such well or wells drilled, being drilled or reworked at or after the expiration date of the Primary Term, this lease shall continue in force so long thereafter as oil, gas or other minerals are produced from the leased premises or from any such unit which includes all or a part of said lands. If, after the expiration of the Primary Term, production on said land shall cease from any cause, this lease shall not terminate provided Lessee resumes operations for drilling or reworking a well within one hundred twenty (120) days from such cessation, and this lease shall remain in force during the prosecution of such operations and, if production results therefrom, then as long thereafter as production continues. 3. The royalties to be paid by Lessee are: (a) on oil, and other hydrocarbons which are produced at the well in liquid form by ordinary production methods, twenty (20.00%) percent of that produced and saved from said land, same to be delivered at the wells or to the credit of Lessor in the pipe line to which the wells may be connected; Lessor's interest in either case to bear its proportion of any expenses for treating the oil to make it marketable as crude; Lessee may from tune to time purchase any royalty oil or other liquid hydrocarbons in its possession, paying the market price therefor prevailing for the field where produced on the date of purchase; (b) on gas, including casinghead gas, or other gaseous substance produced from said land and sold or used off the premises or for the extraction of gasoline or other products therefrom, the market value at the well of twenty (20.00%) percent of the gas so sold or used, provided that on gas sold at the wells the royalty shall be twenty (20.00%) percent of the amount realized from such sale, such gas, casinghead gas, residue gas, or gas of any other nature or description whatsoever, as may be disposed of for no consideration to Lessee, either through unavoidable waste or leakage, or in order to recover oil or other liquid hydrocarbons, or returned to the ground, shall not be deemed to have been sold or used either on or off the premises within )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 6 of sold or used off the premises or for the manufacture of gasoline or other products, nevertheless such shut-in well shall be deemed to be a well on said land producing oil or gas or other minerals in paying quantities and this lease shall continue in force during all of the time or times while such well is so shut-in, whether before or after the expiration of the primacy term hereof, Lessee shall use reasonable diligence to produce and market oil, gas, gas and gas condensate, gas and oil, or other minerals, capable of being produced from such shut-in well but shall be under no obligation to market such products under terms, conditions or circumstances which, in Lessee's judgment exercised in good faith, are unsatisfactory. Lessee shall be obligated to pay or tender to Lessor and all other royalty owners as their interests in royalty under the well shall appear, on or before the anniversary of the date of this lease next ensuing after the expiration of ninety (90) days following the shutting -in of such well, and annually thereafter, while nut:blank 6/29/2( Page 7 of Page 2 of 4 such well is so shut-in, as royalty, the sum of one dollar ($1.00) per net mineral acre covered by this lease. Lessor's portion of such payment may be made or tendered to Lessor or to Lessor's credit by check mailed or delivered directly to Lessor or to a depository bank designated by Lessor. Portions of such payment payable to others may be made or tendered by check or draft, mailed or delivered, to such owner or to such owners' credit in the depository bank designated by such owner, royalty ownership as of the last day of each such annual period as shown by Lessee's record shall determine the amounts and the party or parties entitled to receive such payment. 5. It is understood and agreed that the consideration first recited herein, the cash down payment, which payment is accepted as good and sufficient consideration for the rights conveyed to Lessee hereunder, covers all of the rights and privileges granted to the end of the primary term as aforesaid, and any and all other rights conferred, and that Lessee shall not be obligated to commence or continue any operations during the Primary Term. 6. Lessee, at its option, is hereby given the right and power at any time and from time to time as a recurring right, either before or after production, as to all or any part of the land described herein and as to any one or more of the formations hereunder, to pool or unitize the leasehold estate and the mineral estate covered by this lease with other land, lease or leases in the immediate vicinity for the production of oil and gas, or separately for the production of either, when in Lessee's judgment it is necessary or advisable to do so, and irrespective of whether authority similar to this exists with respect to such other land, lease or leases. Likewise, units previously formed to include formations not producing oil or gas, may be reformed to exclude such non -producing formations. The forming or reforming of any unit shall be accomplished by Lessee executing and filing of record a declaration of such unitization or reformation, which declaration, shall describe the unit. Any unit may include land upon which a well has theretofore been completed or upon which operations for drilling have theretofore been commenced. Production, drilling or reworking operations or a well shut-in for want of market anywhere on a unit which includes all or a part of this lease shall be treated as if it were production, drilling or reworking operations or a well shut-in for want of market under this lease. In lieu of the royalties elsewhere herein specified, including shut-in gas royalties, Lessor shall receive on production from the unit so pooled royalties only on the portion of such production allocated to this lease; such allocations shall be that proportion of the unit production that the total number of surface acres covered by this lease and included in the unit bears to the total number of surface acres in such unit. In addition to the foregoing, Lessee shall have the right to unitize, pool, or combine all or any part of the above described lands as to one or more of the formations thereunder with other lands in the same general area by entering into a cooperative or unit plan of development or operation approved by any governmental authority and, from time to time, with like approval, to modify, change or terminate any such plan or agreement and, in such event, the terms, conditions, and provisions of this lease shall be deemed modified to conform to the terms, conditions, and provisions of such approved cooperative or unit plan of development or operation and particularly, all drilling and development requirements of this lease, express or implied, shall be satisfied by compliance with the drilling and development requirements of such plan or agreement, and this lease shall not terminate or expire during the life of such plan or agreement. In the event that said above described lands or any part thereof, shall hereafter be operated under any such cooperative or unit plan of development or operation whereby the production therefrom is allocated to diffei cat portions of the land covered by said plan, then the production allocated to any particular tract of lands shall, for the purpose of computing the royalties to be paid hereunder to Lessor, be regarded as having been produced from the particular tract of land to which it is allocated and not to any other tract of land; and the royalty payments to be made hereunder to Lessor shall be based upon production only as so allocated. Lessor shall formally express Lessor's consent to any cooperative or unit plan of development or operation adopted by Lessee and approved by any governmental agency by executing the same upon request to Lessee. 7. If Lessor owns a less interest in the above described land than the entire mineral estate therein, then the royalties herein provided shall be paid to Lessor only in the proportion which Lessor's interest bears to the whole mineral estate. 8. The privilege of assigning in whole or in part is expressly allowed, although it is agreed that no change or division in ownership of the land, or royalties, however accomplished, shall operate to enlarge the obligations or diminish the rights of the Lessee. If the estate of either party hereto is assigned, the covenants hereof shall extend to the heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns of the Assignor, but, no change in the ownership of the land or assignment of royalties shall be binding on the Lessee until after the Lessee has been furnished with certified copies of recorded title documents transferring title from Lessor. In the event of death of any person entitled to royalties hereunder, Lessee may pay or tender such royalties to the credit of the deceased or of the estate of the deceased into escrow, as provided by law, until such time Lessee is furnished with proper evidence of the appointment and qualification of an executor, administrator or personal representative of the estate, or if there be none, then until Lessee is furnished with evidence satisfactory to it as to the heirs or devisees of the deceased. 9. In case of suit, adverse claim, dispute or question as to the ownership of the rentals or royalties (or some part thereof) payable under this lease, Lessee shall not be held in default in payment of such rentals or royalties (or the part thereof in dispute), until such suit, claim, dispute or question has been finally disposed of, and Lessee shall have thirty (30) days after being furnished with a certified copy of the instrument or instruments disposing of such suit, claim or dispute, or after being furnished with proof sufficient, in Lessee's opinion, to settle such question, within which to make payment. Should the right )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 8 of authority over the lands covered by this lease or the person of the Lessor herein and in so complying Lessee shall not be responsible for determining the legality, validity or constitutionality of any such law, regulation, or order enacted or issued by an such Governmental body. In determining the residence of Lessor for purposes of complying with such laws or regulations Lessee may rely upon the address of Lessor herein set forth or upon the last known address of Lessor. Neither any error in the determination of the residence or status of Lessor nor an error in the payment of any sums of money due or payable to Lessor under the terms of this lease which is made during the course of or as a result of Lessee's good faith efforts to comply with any such laws or regulations shall terminate this lease or constitute grounds for any cause of action against Lessee. All of Lessee's obligations and covenants hereunder, whether express or implied, shall be suspended at the time or from time to time as )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 9 of Page 3 of 4 compliance with any thereof is prevented or hindered by or is in conflict with Federal, State, County, or municipal laws, rules, regulations or orders asserted as official by or under public authority claiming jurisdiction, or Act of God, adverse field, weather, or market conditions, inability to obtain materials in the open market or transportation thereof, war, strikes, lockouts, riots, or other conditions or circumstances not wholly controlled by Lessee, and this lease shall not be terminated in whole or in part, nor Lessee held liable in damages for failure to comply with any such obligations or covenants if compliance therewith is prevented or hindered by or is in conflict with any of the foregoing eventualities. The time during which Lessee shall be prevented from conducting drilling or reworking operations during the primary term of this lease, under the contingencies above stated, shall be added to the primary term of the lease; provided however, that delay rentals as herein provided shall not be suspended by reason of the suspension of operations and if this lease is extended beyond the primary term above stated by reason of such suspension, Lessee shall pay an annual delay rental on or before the anniversary dates hereof in the manner and in the amount above provided. 11. When drilling, reworking, production or other operations are delayed or interrupted by force majeure, that is, by storm, flood or other acts of God, fire, war, rebellion, insurrection, riot, stiles, differences with workmen, or failure of carriers to transport or furnish facilities for transportation, or as a result of some law, order, ordinance, rule, regulation, requisition or necessity of the government, federal, state or municipal, or as a result of any cause whatsoever beyond the control of the Lessee, the time of such delay or interruption shall not be counted against Lessee, anything in this lease to the contrary notwithstanding, but this lease shall be extended for a period of time equal to that during which Lessee is so prevented from conducting such drilling or reworking operations on, or producing oil, gas, casinghead gas, condensate or other minerals from, the premises; provided that during any period that this lease is continued in force after its primary term solely by force majeure as herein provided, Lessee shall pay to the owners of the royalty hereunder the shut-in royalty provided in paragraph 5 hereof, and in the manner therein provided, without regard to whether or not there is a producing well shut in, located on said land or on land with which the lease premises or any part thereof has been pooled. 12. It is expressly understood and agreed that the premises leased herein shall, for all the purposes of this lease, be considered and treated as owned in indivision by the Lessor and shall be developed and operated as one lease, and there shall be no obligation on the part of Lessee to offset wells on separate tracts into which the land covered by this lease may be now or hereafter divided by sale, or otherwise, or to furnish separate measuring, or receiving tanks, and all rentals, royalties and other payments accruing hereunder shall be treated as an entirety and shall be divided among and paid to Lessor in the proportion that the acreage (mineral rights) owned by each bears to the entire leased acreage. Lessee may at any time or times pay or tender all sums accruing hereunder to the joint credit of Lessor. This lease shall be binding upon all who execute it, whether or not named in the body hereof as Lessor, and without regard to whether this same instrument, or any copy thereof, shall be executed by any other Lessor named above. 13. This lease shall not be terminated, forfeited or cancelled for failure by Lessee to perform in whole or in part any of its implied covenants, conditions or stipulations until it shall have been first finally and judicially determined that the failure or default exists, and then Lessee shall be given a reasonable time to correct any default so determined, or at Lessee's election it may surrender the lease with the option of reserving under the terms of this lease each producing well and the spacing or proration unit, or communitized area surrounding such well as designated by the Oil and Gas Conservation Commission of the State of Colorado, together with the right of ingress and egress. Lessee shall not be liable in damages for breach of any implied covenant or obligation. SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument is executed effective as of the date first above written. Estate of Pete Gallegos, deceased The Stella S. Gallegos Family Trust lei Richard E. Romeo, `Richard E Romeo, as Trustee as Personal Representative ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF (1oeo2 r►p 0 COUNTY OF 3otu.,AEA. r BEFORE ME, this X/ I day of J),ECErrawir , 2017, the undersigned, a Notary Public, in and for '.I A, -- J a.-`- -------I1 -______.J n:.�.. _.� r. .... D..�........I o.... �.,......EeEi......f N... L'eEeEo ..F P..d ediamma )ut:blank 6/29/2( 11V W 111NZJJ W I1GIw Jr, i uavc 3GL my 11411U auu aLILAGU Wy 1.1U101101 aaaa W uo) auaa )a.caa aaaua Lauv•v .•a aaaw..A. Page 10 of My Commission Expires: pq ; , 20� Notary Public )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 11 of Page 4 of 4 EXHIBIT "A" Attached to and made a part of that certain Oil, Gas and Mineral Lease being effective December 18th, 2017, by and between Richard E. Romeo, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Pete Gallegos, aka Perfecto Gallegos, deceased, AND Richard E. Romeo, as Trustee of the Stella S. Gallegos Family Trust, as Lessor, and Incline Niobrara Partners, LP, as Lessee This Exhibit shall serve to represent the mutual understanding and agreement by and between the parties named herein, as to the terms and conditions under which Lessors agree to lease to Lessee. Any language contained in the above lease to the contrary notwithstanding, it is expressly understood and agreed between the parties hereto that the following terms and conditions shall apply: SPECIAL WARRANTY OF TITLE: The Lessor hereby warrants title by, through and under, but not otherwise. Lessor agrees that if a cloud of title shall arise that is deemed to be capable of being cured, that both parties will work together to obtain and sign any curative documents that might be needed to fix a title discrepancy. Any and all cost associated with curative requirements will be borne by the Lessee. INDEMNIFICATION: Lessee agrees to indemnify and hold Lessor harmless from liability, loss, damage, and expense arising out of claims, demands, and suits by third parties for injury to person or property caused by or arising out of the operations of Lessee and its employees, invitees, and contractors upon the leased premises. TIMELY PAYMENTS OF PROCEEDS: Pursuant to C.R.S. § 34-60-118 Lessee agrees to be bound to the payment of proceeds rules and definitions stated therein and more specifically that the Lessee shall be bound to distribute royalty payments within six months from first production, and to continue to make royalty payments each and every month thereafter. TIMELY ACCESS TO TITLE REPORT: Upon written request, Lessee hereby agrees to provide Lessor with a complete copy of the current title report or title memorandum in its possession within four months from the date of the lease. Lessee, or its assigns, further agree to provide Lessor with a complete copy of any title opinion as to all lands on this lease or any spacing unit formed that contains lands in this lease prior to spudding a well on said lands or spacing unit upon written request. SHUT-IN ROYALTY: The amount of the shut-in royalty stated above is changed to $5.00 per net mineral acre. Lessee may not shut-in a gas well for a period of more than 24 consecutive months. PUGH CLAUSE: Following the expiration of the primary term of this lease or the expiration of any extension or renewal of the primary term (including without limitation those contained in any continuous development provisions of the Lease), whichever occurs last, in the event a portion or portions of the leased premises is pooled with other land so as to form a pooled unit or units, operations on such unit or units will not maintain this lease in force as to the land not included in such unit or units. This lease may be maintained in force as to any land covered hereby and included in such unit or units in any manner provided for herein. DEPTH SEVERANCE: It is understood and agreed that three (3) years after the expiration of the primary term of this lease, upon the expiration of any extension or renewal, or after cessation of operations as provided herein, whichever occurs last, Lessee shall release all rights lying below the stratigraphic equivalent of one hundred feet (100') below the base of the deepest producing formation in any well drilled on the leased premises or on lands with which the leased premises has been pooled or unitized. )ut:blank 6/29/2( age Tip UNITED STATES • OF AMERIO.P:17131of �, • To 8Uip'Whom Una PreesateeMist astairmes Homestead Certificate No. —!. ./.2:77--1 APPLICATION A* t (. ....... } m, strew hasAterr dgiootatrd b► the !mesa t Laved O$e. , Me�1 Obita'Stake a certificate of the &Bator e the Lewd 0$.. aai.... /.tw o :xrr .....,1 ! zo..C.R_.........._........., she raby it appears that, pursuant to Ms dct of Matron a:proved NOWT .W4$ , 186S, "T0 SNOW= SOd[88T,8d11d TO UAL UTTL8$8 OX -I' B PUBLIC D08Gd1X," and the aetm sipptoswatai Um**, as odamof........ ..._..,,,,,,, el...seaggano, . ( .. w.............. has bees ataWish�rd and dais consu» asated, in ' ito, for the---........-....- ............................».•••••• .....................».......».................»....................... • .. .. d,A./..4-;‘, .2„,,..0c4:4, R." vww....g 71 red >^. Aee, 1�� ,u +0:4 %I,a v ' - . 4 Azle./ .r i -4.4w.Y$i Cep P01,4crtter44 '&e r :at'.r4 j»ert,- awordirrt to the 0ffi4si Plat of the awry of the said Land. returned to fha G.norai land Offloe ay the Surveyor easerat: l8ie>R Marrs Owe Se, , granted or As UNITED S T bT E S web the acid ...mow treat of land din described: I of land, with Me tae* thaeaf. WISP as I and to. 94 ....helm and aeei"s forever; +alieot ao°"ied sorrforr fir fit, ,ws,e a� ��4aterratrrd er ealher purpose*, and :Vide to ditches mad reservoir: aaati is eausemmas with mesh rata. *AU, as map be rfsiaad and aeab>~aoi.d, j►sd by the beat oust .*a, law and deaateiows of Car*, mad ails: riot to the rifht of the proprietor *f a arts or live I to &street and remove hie we therefran, should Ms wow la 'bend to eta or ttwyeat ihs Prinifee I hereby granted, so provided by law, I has Tmettemmor 'who,p& ae7errie.Q14 Shaw cawed thew lotion to be wade paten*, and the 8sai of the nut:blank PROWriYOdd Ids rMar Lend Ni or to bt :waerrto Algae& _ !i�►.. - 6/29/2( Page 14 of . avemew .w' —. alliwripa ar rss PBE$WDZAT: Alai for laterd She 8rr.�vy.. V Ms GM rsi Land- Va. )ut:blank 6/29/2( e 0 0 I1 sr c3 n ._-1 t ref hereinafter wallet lessor ...lather o,.r vw mar) coil Nadine,' ea 1959 Tills ACNEEUF:\T, made and calmed Into dm Page 15 of _ Recorded ot 0 o'clock 19 1t1W 1852283 %>k2,/i�'� a-i State of Colorado. Weld County Clerk & Recorder ORIGINAL OIL AND GAS LEASE 16th diva January PETE GALLEGOS and STELLA S. GALLEGOS, Husband and Wife, , rd Box 274, Mead, Colorado 80542 CALVIN PETROLEUM CORPORATION,. of 2950 Security Life Bldg. t. 81 by and tremens 1616 Glenarm Place, Denver, Colorado 80202 lee,tnahercalled levier: 1. N'iTNESSETII: That the rester. In: and in mirside-tattoo n1 IS 10.00 & more cash in hand pars, pd of which is larrrht a,knooreila.d. teasel and hi VIII l,� the than unor-smolt .ret. ilia, giant, denim, leant niul lotter t i-.rl.lurrlyned rin ei, in part ea d Irene, testae t.uhl be the nasri a.oii' and nevi of PIamtll e. kimpl[orin 1,t. .'.,ph urn ,I not molar method, and iVo•raluaa tan and pualu, nig therefrom oil and all gat ,d 'ahatsorter nalnrr or baud and la►,na pine Ions. telrphotw wive felr¢r.aph Ili,.••• It -mom rout hoarding imployt'r•. lowbrow tanks, power martini, gasoline plants, pane.. madeass, and striatum, thereon to proulnr.•, .air, marker , al rale I Me of said airliner anal the ass linos ardorla mil ina..tmeni for oridsce a then and economical cei trims! in <o operation aloneninsOO it 1 at pas tontlY milh�neiighborid all ng lah ndforooh nutd tnoer. MI daat to certain once priaIIeaes nnr•ary, narl••nl it.,,Pr trail or tracts id land smarted in the r in.oI) of WELD , Slate of COLORADO , tir,c•du',1 as hahi n. H.•wr. TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANCE 68 WEST Section 10: North 50 acres of South 1O0 acres of NWT. Section 10: Part of NW', described in Deed dated January 24, 1970, recorded in Book# 620, Reception #1542463, of the Official Records of Weld County, Colorado, containing 20 acres, more or less. of Section lotmhip . ... Ilan e, , and containing - 7.0 . .• . more to list, / 2. It n agreed that this In+r thrill 'email' in inner for a term of �( wee.ANA n i ate and an ben[ thereafter n) mfr to [u d whattorvrr nature ar kind, or either of them n produced titan said land of premises pooled okd therewith in drilling nprretl.al are continued es hernnafter provided. II poor to discovery of nil or etas mt sane lend, in on arreate pladrd therewith, lessee should drill a dry hole or holes therein, or If alter discovery of oil or gas production rheteafter should crate Inn any cause, this (rase shall con terminate ii letar. CUM ITN Intl additional drilling or rtwmkieg operations within aaly 1[01 days thereafter. car Ill it hie 'sllhm the prinwry trvn) comanorcet or re mle•t the payment or armlet in matal on or before the rental -paying date nest ensuing after the ea. ;Oration of three 191 months from the dale nl c.rmpletam of a do hole or ,r•sannn of praluntlan. If, e1 the emigration of din primary from el this prase. col no gat Is nok bring pmdsuril on or (ram seal land or said podia pandas•,, inn l,sur it lien engaged in rizhlent in reworking operations thereon. then this lease sill eolith., in (lap an Iona M„,melee an dullma ,a ',working dpi tattoos are beam eraitimenasly prosecuted no said land In OR a drillara or dr- selnipnant or ',longing unit whah mollifies all Ilia pan id said land, aid ,h.,boe PI 11'w rib lnf aperalltnn shill to considered to he tunlmmlesly pruwt9trd if ma ni•,r thou Nall' day's shall elapse brewrrn de I,am1,l. ,lam ',• lhambaon.••if of . n, al II and the h.•wmmnt of narrations for the dolling or rrwimkmqq III anallr'r ui'll. II nil in gas shall Is- ins n. rind cool a.. prmrlu, r•l loon at... ouh omit or wells drilled. Mang drdlid in remain' al or alter 11o• , winnows of Ihv pnnan' h•Ini ad this hnrsr, this lean,• dial) n..rhitp• .a lard vim long ttws,•.drri as oil or it.,, as Iaiaborn► Imo the h•asnl patron rot Irum con usch ,mil irk!' wand., all in a pot ad salt lands. 3. iii tmisidrialkln ad Ihr prt•em.rs the said boa, - fill 'In) drho•i h. Ihr etrvlu Ail Iris, leer id ion m nu. 141.1. Imo If ohm! I••err ahoy ronnrvt hit walla. the. equal nneatithfh pan of all oil pnalinwl alai ♦.m,.! honer min• 1.'awsl litrna.,,,. ,n Al IM I....•r'5 . p+ . min lu/ bi the If'.•oi La %Intl nar-r•ithth rigahy, the market Tatar fin td if film, woah' and gratify Inr..mhua an, rlu• day owl, oil is iron rote di, paw hoe or ono storage Ia.i►•. (b) To lily least lot gas of uhals,N't•'r r atter ,ee Imo! pualinea and dd, .0 rowel ,III the premiers, sir awl' in the marmfm'hilr of any products iherefisms,'OW rrihsh, ,n tire• OW lief poi.- at IM, are) Hit the gas add, awl all the prrnesrt, to m the manufacture of products therefrom. Where Man Iron) a 'nil' pooh ..mist an ouch' n not .add ..r nu -,I. hater ,ii..l' pa) or trailer a. III, All) I)nr Mill.: (WI )rnr per nrl myelty ,err aiaurrd telemeter. old, protoked, or tender In he Oahe Ili at. heIoai• Ifni nom, ,rw•r• al it.' .4 Ilus Ie,av twit .'ie•Ni,g alter IM- a's1i0.sna,n. of It day luml the dale such well n snail iii and Ion finial hlinroas ladore ,n ► die �a.lr•.ism,ai1il at II id aim, Ii p s u i- mu1 u is t cal.-. I n rah mails.. soil. if nyll Will 'hii1.4. . lit, fii1 II! ..cif limit at. era lin Win n bringf III IOW pto.luewl too anion a the weaning Or IS' I fin 01 rota this I. If I I. I''Nt.tNpm Ion Ihr lulling id ,t well 1°, ,.11 .#I gas an. .Ir,l l'•inll rood ae 11 115 1.' .. 1.•• NI mI gas heroic ptall.{'1'il rut ,Ned land or Ina .n)'1. .1,,' pooled thrtew-ul1 as IN'iru..Jt•a iuou,L,l Ia. w INt.itr toil 1 Ill' d.u: 1141•-a,,, silt I. .car shall it^rnmiatr as In hash paten's, nnlrs dn.lissrr Oil Of !what. drat dais' ,l.tit par sN tv,!.', 1„ di. I p1• •.re.-ytat '. s. , d... L ...,,.i,.:n . iii• Space Age Federal Credit Uniaak .at — AFAFC —SAFLU, Denver, Colorado 80279 , .•r d. .a,. •iiai. .I•11 11 stall a.nrhusu• as Ihr dupwnn•.1V lam ft -Mal n•g.,nlir•• M il...Ms in Ifni r.ssin'ishap of said lane, the ...in ,.t Seventy and no/10O * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * IN)61..hUS 1'n 70.00 , afro I. hail n,.,'iah• n r.-n6d :od '- -are the I mire.' of deli Nina the nmmu•Irrmrut .d too rali.nn I, r drilling id a w•Il I.., 154,15.• ni,ot hs Irrtn •.rod rleh . Ian .oaoi.., are, ,.p.„ Ills p.nu, nn s il .i. il.l. . Ih.w°uioverarm'.• , 'ms at i overalos for dnthna of .s a ll Ina, IV lugh•t ,L -bind lit, lilt. In, wit . •.1 Ili. car numb* I .4 monde. nnr.,n••is. .111% pasmr cat. .,1 ,anal„,s rota, In) Mall,, lir ,h•e k , a dealt of 1,.,.•.- or .ins matron.theca.t tad•l a dere.aol uu ui b.t•or thi, .dol i,.•. ere &O. ' It t. oral. re, oil .awl ti.11 IM• e,Nraderaten tail isti ,ll hereto. the Lawn pallor,,, saver. lad rail. the 1•o.iL-a' g...did I.. II+ In.ubrn hod !•r,o.d .. pa. dd. .r aiii...,'.1• Ion• alai IM '•saes uahl if ...lending that d •s II' 1. ahnr.ad, alai soy taint all sed„' 11011•. ,ndrrinl ♦I,t.nLl tin' ,t. pistil -•n IJIM 144•1..111,1 I. pie wna.,,ot I •.n'..'es,r, I...i w on. 1 1• ..s.ei,s a, ih•p toarrul.rl or royalties is, any NaO, il, :l Ial.l 1.N.drtlto ilea vo.. ,a°rds w/llt t1,r :uM oasord batik. afro.' Non„ -d wu b .Ii Vomit tit br M.A.! I. hewn AI last li.:wa aildn•ss. S. Lesser. : i 1H °idiom if, hereby green the uphl and power .,t arm rime .on from time to time ,x a recurring right, either before or after production. as to all car ,soy' pail of the I,md described M'r,•u, and a•. to any um ,r roo,te of die Inn.ahmss hereunder in pool or unitize the .rnseh0kl estate and the nunen.d rslak• ruvrrrd Inc this lease with t thin Lod :rase in le.c. s u, the unuedude vicinty (oar live production of WI and gas, Ili separately for Ihr production of either, when In lessees ,,tdttmeni it is necessary or :alv.s.thlr In do so. and irrespective of whether authority similar In) dim rants with respect to such other Iatul, Icier or ;eases 1.akrr'ite. antler p tevnmsly tit, mad to Prelude formations nut prudururf oil or gas. tn:ty lw tills,,.mvl In) vulture such nun-pr°ducimg formations The romans: or let., cat env shall he accomplished by lessee mirroring am' firma of rrrnmt deCi,,, ou ,d 'MCI) .sn,nr,slt,n or n•L,rmiunnn. which declaration .hail drsrrde the root Any rind may include land upaaga which a well km therein - fore Ia•i•n a ntupletrd Of rodeos whir . utengartas for Malnp, have Ilweretmlure Iarn commenced. Production. drilling or rewirkiult operations car a well shot in for word of .a market 'rota svtwur '.n if Mill wluch umchides all or a part of Ihis lease shall he treated as if it we're pro tatirrn dot elude: ur reworking moo atkills ur , well ch,II /la Ion wart of a marker under this horse In) Urn) of 1lw royalties elsewhere herein specified incitation shul•on Ras rty .,ihrs. :vc iii shad mean i• con production from the unit so pooled I...sallres only on the wallets o1 surh production allocated to this Iciest. such allocation shall hoe 01..1 po`paoi5,51 1,1 the unit production that Ihr total nnnl.er of +unlace acres coveted Its this tease and included or Ifi.• mud be..,s to the renal us :Wiser ul Stir (f at..• .tent. m .nth Nall Ia addition to the foegnmg, lessee shall have the right to inutile. pail. or nunlniu• all If- all., part of the atr,vi• described lands as I,, one car roar d Ihr for m.0 ants thereunder with other lands u1 Ihv sun., Rem•I al nitro by rnirnnn operative in uiot •dam of development or operations ,ppno.reN) by anv gasernmental authority and. limn atime to tune. with like aa{lspnrval. lI mrriily. change or tertian ore »us' utiert plan cal aitrtmrul cud. on such evert ihr lei mu, cosdtlrnns. and prmdarrins of this lease shall be deemed modified III t.Inforns In ihr •emus, C,Nr111l1mtH..trld ,m:vusums of :arch ssppPrayed cooperative or unit plan of development a iteration and. parnruhetiy• all drilling and development ,iywremeials of this lean. express ur implied, shall It. satisfied by compliance willi Me drilling and drvedopn.ent requirements of such plan or agra•iurut nod din lease shall not terminate or expire during the life of such plan RI agreenienl In the event that -arid .done described lands or any pearl theeeil.:.Iht1 Ito, s•after lie eperastNl under ,any not oai(tet,,laser- mr loin plan of development nn Oprtatlon whereby dice arrainchoa therefrom is allocated bi different portions of ihr land covered by said plan. barn the prwltrelwn allocated in any llariacular tract of lane shall, for the purpose of computing IIre m,yalhe• to he paid hereouder to lessor be regarded as having been produced from the trarirru:ar bast of land to which It Is ailrcate4 and tout t° any tither trait of land- and ihr u,syally 1nynwitls to be made hereunder to lessor shall be baerd Of Ors JO. Nhicun t only os to allocated lessor sh:,Il formally extorts tr..u1•s consent to any nm;ff',.. V,'iu MO plan of development hit :sdnpte,l by leer, and approved by any govrrnmenhst aaencv by executing the same upon trattoria of tutee )ut:blank 6/29/2( Page 16 of N. I1 the estate .4 etlh'r 14uty Intl., t...+iCaa.•1. And the pn.ihj.• .a assiptin, it abide i lit pact is esp,ersb alh,nrd, akMmlth H is agM'al 11sad ,n. rhansr ur ,svnoa, Oa in *.hip .4 flat lnn,I, •'ntals .ta tun witty.. h,twr..a am.n.pllshed, .b..1I ,.pa•twtr U. enlaair the i ,ltltaltnan is diminish the rights of the tenet.. the I.arnA,ii learnt shallextent! 11. do U hots. .'settling.. adtntnntt t!.n,, ,4. ,. •,w. a} r.,, ens, boil no change m the owtw'ashili of the iuwl „r as.,t111n4'ad tel te.aals of n..altirs da.dl hr buolnnl tat the Its., -r not.' alter the lets-, ho. h.. a L,rm.hol with ceittlard t•,f S .4 /am,n*o'Ms of title de...tem.,* t,tle fun, . I at ., inar hs oilseed it, the .arid the, I, ate shall he a.s,ts..l as t., a pan „a pats n1 the alo,srakinlaad lands a,wt Its. assiganr or assotores .d sash Imre ur pan • shall Ind o, mate dela,tl n, do- Iuunrnt d al,.' p,up..b.,o,t.• part 'u lh.• it 'Os die frays. bins at IMtn, snrls default \ha11 ms np-,ate to drft-at n. Atte, t ILas Iran. tootto. .,. a sorts a pail ..t p..t..4 and Iamb. .I• a.. a huh nit- •..u1 kiwi' . r any assiam,• thereof .14th male ,fur pa. anrM of aid lentol. lit Itt tit,+ .d ,Lath nl ant prawn, ,nta1..i ha rrttlwb hen ,nol.'r I.....' ant, pa, of Itmlrr sot 1, nna..ls b, the reedit .4 the ,bwra..41 00 the estate aft the dr. ran -.I +.tilt r.1, hu,. as 1....r.• Is Ienr,t.M•J *alt p,..p.i rrhh•nrr .,j Ito .,ptnani•ra,d and tl,aldlcalmn .d an eUrtsdln of sahhimsttalan .4 the rslate, or if dale he mote. Own mad In.. t as lu,an\hnl • ,•l rsld,•an.• tatida,Jaty to at as m tlo bras m des nrrs d the ,h'.rawni. 11. la a..4 M rein auuaol..u41 app" es to tletrtut tin title to thr Imtb hetein tieee don1, and at,.ws that the less' shall Lase the nuhl at :my lain hl pay lot Irs.o,, any an..Uerer. t:.t•s 1., tlmv Ian. an. the ,dtU%t'dixtal.ed lan:ls us Ihr rsrnt 01 drlaoll ,d pasitwnt by from, sod be antaintal.'d h. the ...Alas of the lwdttei ahr'o,,l tail {,•.w.1 M•,rl.s aaetrr. that any sots postural* granite by the lessee In. the Ir.sur *nay 14• deducted haws any anntn,t. „I ,avmrs *bill ...al- h'. nun' tho' the Sr.w+ olalrr II,. terays 4 thes'rase. 10. II .ant 1.•aur .'A o., 4 I,.s .004,14.00.41, ,n II.r ahes,'akscadrd {rant than tint .-+air.• anal umbrnlad fee simple estate therein, tin•,, th.- a,n.dtos a..,1 na,tals brutal. gnus',hal shall l4 'milt the hawr. ails in p1.ap,ulann *ha,h hi. ,air. ,e'st bra,: to the a h,F' ai.d ondwuktl ler. APIs miruM m ihr p..,.1... two, I IM land. Iw n•sn d.w.,it.-.1 in v huh tlr ,narn•sl ul k•w., ,nail tar saLwrl .hall Ire tl•.hn led Ir ow Ile• MS alit Minn res.-nett ada 2 0 3981 )ut:blank 6/29/2( r an i 83 i 1. � comply with all laws sod of Commoner body g Oki°be •wwfr easing wllwelty ours the leads evt�+� r1C� . shyvalidity et oonNlludandKY d any such law or the gpseeeses date lease herein mod in so a foments! shall net d e mimi g t mammy tomefor s al complying with ad laws nr n�l edem I m o may maned o bead byes soy ere! tset hod body. In die Meg the of leaser. Nether error is the desern ioattsa el the reMdenoo es knee as rely owes ev address d knee Meta ter frith w rose dal sow known to kris d d this esse which is ware dosing the terse of MOW as d woe k an eseee is its efforts Mewed d is p moss d weary dm r paeaula a term easier the this � far any cause of action w a • erwe d lease's geed kith ens a Y an.aa bs and such or esss implied, b led at constitute � as ham time en time as towplMaoe With a desert. Ails . me afor�iabbyoovamaab a is in mIlki er a. �lclpal laws. inks. hguiatlen+ ar Erosive Orders minted as Midst t ' founder k /er cleaning ludsdMMa. with el G e.to sh and side haw shell atlfeW �y er nbe/er public ardtes(b roe Act al �,,d, adverse watMq or market conditions. (mattildY in obtain makeMM in IM emerge � okra, oe air conditions of dnwwstasees net wMyi�!!.enntndkd by pot to, whaler/rimarend. gar. ,y may, la foe failure to amply with say suck cby w cournanta if eempeleaoe Share• mot be enecated In hindered pen. nor Mare held l� the lemming evaMuaHHlte/. The Nerve during which Irmo airy be fr+nenNd ham aondect(mi wick g o r i m in hi h°vood try a is b provided in l ma be by reason d dated. shad Si. added akd a eery tehtnh of Me kbeare or eewaWq in. that lay son& t howlsd tih hw. mdsupooded by reaso s l dm eua�a a� leer► encoded the pOmary Seem Move slated by nasal d such es oeedos. lessee shall pay an i nwd delay motel au re anslvenasy dates hereof in the misuser end in the amount above provided• land hand to lessee. w should any MO er more d td pareks ILes Should say Penns. Ilse or ve Bose the pasty a pastes 'aendng Ike aim anmrd chow w lessors I so. atom h e sles. sod it helm. the and hereby slew sad wake all us under s d by virtue of thIS. lliir e homestead ewwptks�ws el said rte. Mods the mars~ to any way �itfect is. Durpwes r which this lean Is w noted lees. IN 71 1NN��, the rndiedCdd caste the h etnumut as of the day and tear lint above wires. _..._._..-..Eete._fallei*e G llG l s........ ......____S tella...S.L_Gallevaa....................._---........_- ....... _..SSf aS.'.Z$l_it .,.3._.._.__.—._.—_._..._.—. ....... ..... _..SSt..... 67.1ZS- IL5 z, ACKNOWLEDGMENTS •.•eh,h redo... .. STATE OF •t� , _ ._.... _........._ n s �[ %' ei . I , (9 . before me. personally appeared ......... ._ _.._. ..._. :`db�.tbN..:� f �'�'-ef•';.daY of ..... ._ ..... .. ,... - - ......_ ` ,Egt....al legog-Si . . ..S.....GallegO$,. }�r.�. ••.. ..Mme known to be the prison .... described In and who emoted the fommiag p� ` free eat and deed. bod)aQ�t.StrdgeeSy'tCtss eldt _they. exerted the tame as .their .. flyy ettaehil{le rtpimj.•' QQ `•.._. ._............... /.— • ��t..!L.N 5fl ..... p l; ... ., .. NMarY 1'Whik • •,...,,eel`•' STATE OF ...- COUNTY OF ... On IMM ... __ day d imtreetent. and acknowledged In in. that ..... .., rerouted the tame as My commission eap:nst Oil and Gas Lease STATE OF .... COUNTY OF Onll.h personally appeared known to me to he the � f O 1�, ilr . day of INDIVIDUAL North Dakota, South Dakota. Nehruka INDIVIDUAL. North Dakota. South Dakota, Nebraska • l'1 • Monte ow. personalty appeared .. In nee known to he the prism described in and who executed the faregoiag free act and deed. 0 V a -o A a c. 9 e n r fL 4. f. c g Natty Public: CttitPOIIATE, North Dakota. South Dakota, Nebraska nn the your ......... , before me, a Notary Public. • of the Corporation that is described to and that emeuted the within inetrumwnt and Page 17 of ■ mt:blank 6/29/2( Page 18 of )ut:blank 6/29/2( AR19ab11a B 1047 REC 01986118 10/24/84 12:24 $3.00 1/001 F 0862 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO Page 19 of AFFIDAVIT OF PRODUCTION ROONEY P. CALVIN, of lawful age, being first duly sworn upon his oath, states that he is President of Calvin Petroleum Corporation, (CAPCO), a Colorado Corporation, authorized to conduct business within the state of Colorado, and that he is authorized to make this affidavit on behalf of said corporation and its co -owners and associates: I. That CAPCO is an owner and/or operator of the following described oil and gas tease(s) covering lands in Weld County, State of Colorado: Oil and Gas Lease dated January 16, 1981 from Pete Gallegos and Stella S. Gallegos, husband and wife, overing Section 10: N. 50 acres of S. 100 acres of 1414; Section 10: Part of NiPs,'ddsc. In Deed dated January 24, 1910, recorded in Book 620, Reception 01542463 of the Official Records of Weld, County, Colorado,=containing 20 acres, more or. less, T3N-R68W, Weld County, Colorado, recorded:in Book 930 at Reception #1852283. . II. That the herein described leases arelfor a term of five (5) years from the effective date thereof or so long thereafter as oil and/or gas is produced therefrom. III. That a well capable of producing oil and gas has been completed on the above described lands, or lands pooled therewith, on February 10, 1984 in the "J" sand Formation. 4 IV. 'That this affidavit IS made and executed in compliance with provision of Section 38-42-106 Colorado Revised Statutes 1973, and is for the purpose of giving notice that the above described leases are extended beyond the primary terms by production from the well set forth in Paragraph III hereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument is executed this /LW, day of jL 1J2 1984. Z ATTEST' Secre "to coroji". 'I STATE OF Ca.CILLIA *V4/ L•" 1 ss. COUNTY OF WELD. ) tJ-/N(i CALYINEUN CORPORATION Do ney P. Ca resident • ...J .rww. '!w Iaivua fns )ut:blank tiv Qndnov P. Calvin. on this day of 6/29/2( Notary Public Page 20 of )ut:blank 6/29/2( Hello