The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20180990.tiffINVENTORY OF ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION Applicant Lorena Garcia Case Number REO 17-0064 Submitted or Prepared Prior to Hearing At Hearing 1 Opposition Letter — Dany Harper, 9132 Apache Rd — November 28, 2017 2X p positron Letter — ilk iam Michelle Luce, Apach Fed — December s 1X 3 4 Opposition Letter — John Adams -Gorton, 9261 Apache Rd — December 7, 2017 Follow up to Opposition Letter 4 — John Adams -Gorton — December 12, 2017 Opposition Letter — Freddy Martinez, 9262 Apache p Rd — December 12,2017 Opposition Letter — Edward Patton, 9031 Apache Rd — December 18, 2017 8 Letter from Anadarko - Mineral Interest Owner's response - No Concerns I hereby certify that the (8) eight items identified herein were submitted to the Department of Planning Services at or prior to the scheduled Board of County Commissioners hearing. RydeY ddick. , Plannel pi a, 2, • a I 7 ) SZ1 CI (1) iv -% )4 cfs P I lel% IN) An 145 httves4v6 cs is, le 4:3 teat \p, le arre, lc it' 0 SF. r -Sal Ck. nit 9 1 ‘NICL\ \it O 14 Cra* Cidt res1/4. tl.M IA. ir. as 1 7 n 4t4 tg, 9 % i's ft,s, t) )3/4 iali1/4, }rkill C,. ej c ek Ilevi 4z) Pstra. arla‘ r 0, izU A—, tak i1/4k., i ,_ C , lc, Slai dr iNs, ,. 0 >, 1---, 4 _3 kis t. ci 4,,, e Nk 4% te %I v e ricry 'I csksi li1/4 IA 1C- 6 Nial :). Li n) J c..) 0 \ K4 { 1v t c1/4 .fr-Fs; Issirts is)) ?mkt/ c : .a },:cp ick \... P:-.1/4 c, i 1 k O1 \-- -, '1/4.4. \"` (1. i C,Si CI, --I le- 'Q es X N, 1," 4 /4$ les i i -e 4 1,--, i, ...„ Vs- L r , 9 .., 3, IR, 4'1) 4\ \ c'tv ii.r ent-Jai, .4.,, , 1 5 Noy\ 0 14ta. c. les+ L. c., ,1/4., cis i,,,, Q L 1V I is j Li t IN a, Ntri \iv ; In ii, O VS:\e )racil ‘,. a las e ir Vsje rim et 1.,.. tr- "a 91 -› C / % is." al . N't Jin1/4 re Li c-:-.' le. il 1/4) e eic eLs el ) 0 e. t ) N C‘ ht )1c O eS es? ais I v e nit.> ci\i‹. erle% NV ill iNN 11/4 y O i Pat iv I \sot ) s —PC ‘niSirtik‘NI‘C tie) L taft• le \ A 4/. i t N. t7 nil 11 tr7r' 11-- Sg CS --ip \-41, t‘a, 1 P. fin %.- -v Tr i\e\ A -CI ‘117 _ fi: N, 4c) IN, (EN IC rt Cc:1V tri 01Y Wags � $ tepac4oeviY CZCEA-Ci LWIF‘CE. I eser 4 re A 1`-.3/4,`kt, 44 It Ti 4 ic; 'sr , taa Vvt, itaa tei, LC -Yea AFP C I 'I' 9e. —fry )kla November 27, 2017 Th To; Weld County Planning Services en, Ira We are writing this letter in response to your notification regarthng, Case P USR17-0064;awl Lorena tai Garcia 9231 Apache Road in Casa Grande, ing), +i %%Cy try pc•Ne We were notified of the county's involvement with their construction by the attached letter tatas ' t+n ,'placed" in our mailbox three days before the meeting,) During the meeting Juan told us that "visiting family would be living in the newly constructed part no more than a month a year. When asked if plans included a kitchen, he said, "I don't remer ber...Lorena is more up on that" and she was gone to Mexico at the time for family funerals. We have a hard time believing he wasn't more aware of the construction than that and an even harder time believing that they were going to all this expense for family to stay only one month out of the year. (Makes it very hard to trust your neighbor at his word)Juan also stated that he had a meeting with the county on Monday and (at neighbors' request) would check to see if someone from the county could come out & talk with our neighborhood. On Monday we called the county and found he was really going to court on several violations regarding their property (none of which he mentioned to us irnthe meeting.) We do not believe they were na�ve enough not to realize that this building (which they already have in place) is not legal in our area. We believe they purposely started this project (putting it up very quickly) to put the neighbors in an awkward position of disagreeing with its construction. As owners of a landscaping company we would think they would be aware of proper planning, permits, & building codes, so we believe they blatantly disregarded proper procedure & laws, We are NOT in favor of building a second single family dwelling unit. This is a residential/agricultural area and do not want it to become multiple families nor rental property. In fact, we have very strong suspicions that more than one family is presently living in their original dwelling. There are multiple vehicles on their site 24 /7 Our concerns regarding their Home Business' is that they are already dumping truckloads of landscaping waste (cement pieces, weeds, grass waste...) & their truck drivers drive way too fast for a residential area. We are very concerned now with their lack of taking care of property to be presentable (neat, orderly, clean ...not sure they ever clean their cattle pens). What will be next if given permission to expand...with their total disregard of laws & proper procedure? We appreciate your consideration of our concerns and want to be actively involved in any future meetings. Sincerely, "nt-t te ,42& ZI‘-etrhArasea Thomas E v. RevorlyJ Moore 9062 Apache Road Longmont, Co 80504 Home Rhone: 303-833-2729 12/3/2017 Weld County Dept. of Planning 1555 N. 17th Ave. Greeley, Co 80631 RE: Case # USR17-0064 Name: Lorena Garcia Dear Mr. Reddick, PF.C.FIAiF.n DEC o'7 2011 \d Cookoj GRaELE ( OFFICE In regard to the notice for this case and the planning boards pending decision regarding the building project for Ms. Garcia, we have several comments related to the project: We do not have an issue with the detached 4 car garage as it currently exists. We do have an issue with the proposed second dwelling on the premises as it is our understanding that none of the lots in this subdivision are allowed to have a second dwelling and th tindivrduut tots cannot be subdivided to accommodate a second dwelling. If this second dwelling is to be allowed, can we as homeowners or other neighbors expect the sa m e consideration if we should desire to build a second residence on our properties? We feel that allowing this second dwelling as it currently exists, sets a new precedent that has the potential to change the character of the neighborhood that we would like to see preserved. We would like to see the second dwelling removed or restricted to non-residential usage. If a non- residential use is allowed, a decision regarding how this will be enforced becomes the next challenge as the homeowner has told us that he intends to use it for visitors to his home for an unclear number of days during the year. a We feel that restricting the home owner to no more than three commercial trucks for his home business usage is reasonable. Finally, we have been advised by adjacent neighbors that the homeowner is using the back (West) portion of his property to dump waste materials including construction debris and waste barrels. This is of great concern to us as it directly impacts the value and potential safety of o u r property and neighborhood. We would like to see this matter investigated through a governing authority. If it is determined, through the investigation, that the homeowner is indeed illegally dumping, we would request that the homeowner be required to immediately stop dumping and clean up his property within a very tight time frame. Respectfully, William !. Luce Michelle G Luce 9362 Apache Rd. Longmont, CO 80504 EXHIBIT December 5, 2017 Weld County Planning er vi ces 1555 North 1Th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Attn: Ryder Reddick RE: Case #USR17-0064 R17-0064 R Fr:F(11EO De 7 2917 Weld Cu,�I��r�l�iarrr1rr1e a �'�i.EY UF��GE �tmeru I received notice of the proposed project noted by the case U 17aOO64. I own the adjacent property to the north, and while I believe the project should be allowed to be completed, I have several issues with the use of the property. A second single family dwelling on the same property would be inconsistent with the existing "rural residential" land use in Casa Granda Estates. I oppose any subdivision of properties and more than one residence per property. This could lead to its use as a rental unit and an increased number of persons of different families occupying the property, and an increase in the number of personal vehicles, I do think that its use as a guest house would be appropriate, if not abused. The proposed commercial use of the property is also inconsistent with existing land use, At this time more than three trucks, numerous pieces of equipment and trailers, are stored or are used by the owner's business, In addition, the property has what appears to be more livestock than the property can support, and waste and drainage are becoming an issue. Are the number of animals per acre of usable pasture regulated by the county? TFFink- t I efeediraii JoI f Adams -Gorton 91451 Apache lead Lon ,mont,CO 80504 EXHIBIT December 9, 2017 Weld County Planning Services 1555 North 1r Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Attn: Ryder Redd ick RE: Case # USRI7 064 kit After my letter of comment (December 7, 2017) on the proposed project, I reviewed all the related information on the web site. There is an additional item I would like to draw to your attention, The Pre -Application Meeting memorandum (June 15, 2017) itemized the requirements for the project and the owner responded. The Engineering Department's stormwater and drainage requirements, were answered with the "Drainage Narrative" by the owner, and indicate no d ra i n age problems. I do not believe the owner plans any further action. In my letter of comment, I noted that "waste and drainage are becoming an issue". When the driveway to the new garage was placed, the original culvert and drainage was modified, causing the existing stormwater flow line along Apache Road to be disrupted causing a backup. To relieve this backup, the owner cut a diversion ditch along the north property line, extending west approximately 150 feet, and all flow from the south to the north along Apache now is diverted to the west. Since that diversion was cut, the owner has installed a cattle feed pen at the very place the water flows, Given the property contours, the stormwater would flow through the cattle pen to the west and then north onto my property. I would like County Engineering and County Health to examine the site and determine if this is a violation and what the resolution should be. I do not want cattle waste and stormwater soup discharged -onto my property; -- Thank you, itt Clef Joh Ada nsmGorton 91 1 Apache Road Longmont, CO 80504 12/10/2017 Weld County Dept. of Planning Re: Case #USR17-0064 Name: Lorena Garcia Dear Mr. Reddick, RECEIvrr DEC 12 2017 Weld County w'I-Jm GREELEY ui notice of this project. I live one house down on the east side of the I received construction project I have some thoughts which I'd like to express and some � questions. One of my regarding concerns is re a rdi n the 4 car garage & apartment. I understand our area is zoned single family for dwelling which I would Ike to see continued and enforced. If this is approved, does this mean we can all build multiple family dwellings on our property? In regard to the business, I'm OK with the business with three commercial trucks. is that the property is well maintained, kept in order and presentable. My concern p p 1� to see a mess(e.g. dumping materials like concrete other waste) l don t urrant which adversely affect the presentation/curb appeal and bring down my property value. process along quickly this moves as possible so that everyone (including Lorena and her family) is able to move forward in an amicable manner. Thank you for keeping me informed in this matter and appreciate notice of future p g actions. Sincerely, Fre dy Martinez 9262 Apache Road Longmont, CO 80504 stake/ AA e c4s, irt At excuric/ -1-,dfr: Yet: ( /MA/CA.10 QteS 44 ) 555 ?ii IR /r' atigi Ecce: Lgras94-oocq 04 Q O, innici4DPick Y1 P MP.- Gc`7'" 4 thrifascr yr `r `ME Fig -sr Hocisz,_ oto A.0%—rag-ar heicst eprz /44Polickfr&en Q•0 flop ko RE? ;to i\t\ au) ssga.,43 hr-ei p meg les_ 1-77742 LA4, ovus G /doc, ears irri-441 car 27 so &term. 1;04 tom teP & Part/ a *IT voeuNt-r- /a; -4.2.-ier -7-74 per ICI *11 if *►1 3I*MR. Mr Edward W Patton 9031 Apache Rd Longmont CO 80604 ,rtooet-i it v {{ •;11 eta.1 ' 7r �• re -a), D (Tr gieur tyi PsVatm OP ,iiv/v S 55 Ai) ;11fry � \.J a67-4 0242 ion I C -A-; A'` &15R 77at% EClS3jl-'-ii 7T 4 a (43 ziji NADAR O PiF f ROB HMO i OR 'URAflUN MAIN (720) 929-6000 1099 18 S TREE J Suainn 1800 # DENVER, CULORADD 80202 4nada March 27, 2018 VIA E-MAIL Weld County Department of Planning Services Attn.: Ryder Reddick 1555 N 17th Ave Greeley, CO 80631 a NOTICE OF MINERA.L INTERESTS AND OIL AND GAS LEASEHOLD INTERESTS T OWNED BY AN. DAR O LAND CORP.4 ANNA () FAT ONSHORE LLC AND KERR-MeGEE OIL & GAS ONSHORE LP Re: U SR 17 -0064 Lorena Garcia "Applicant" Township 2 North, Range 67 West Section 17: LOT 25 CASAGRANDE , DE ESTATES Weld County, Colorado Mr. Reddick: This letter is being submitted on behalf of Anadarko Land Corp. and Anadarko EP Onshore LLC (together the "Anadarko entities") and Kerr-McGee Oil & Gas Onshore LP ("KMOG" or the "Company") to inform you that the Anadarko entities own mineral interests ftln !Lim T iC t o nnmar flt u zral;r nil oncl gas �--- ' �---s - +u �si7 V T 7 iL Y1 %.l1 K . 7.L1iS '_/■ l 4.&11%4 �{� sett elarts r: sib nr n11 14111.1164 4./1 1�} 1115 L111 " ILA" La- n r.T Cl, A -i- 1 al U1 Fat to 3.Ji ►,Jlase L,+le, and 1 i Township 2 North, Range 67 West ("Property"). The mineral interests constitute a real property interest that entitles the Anadarko entities or their lessees to develop, operate and maintain oil and gas wells on the Property in accordance with applicable local and Colorado oil and Gas Conservation Commission ("COGCC") regulations. The Anadarko entities believe that their mineral interests have significant value. KMOG's recorded oil and gas leases are real property interests entitling it to produce nil and gas from the leased lands. The Company has the right to produce from existing wells, to maintain, rework, recomplete, and fracture those existing wells to enhance production, and to drill new wells to produce oil and gas, in accordance with applicable Colorado Oil and. Gas Conservation Commission regulations and Colorado Statutes. KMOG's oil and gas assets have significant value, and the Company is consequently concerned about any development, surface use, plan of use, PUD, zoning or rezoning, or other action by the County that would impair or pra .rtt.irlins aI.d its 4ability to develop 1%ci3 oil id.111y,j- R. s interests. The Anadarko entities and KMOG do not object to the subject site specific development plan and special review permit providing the Applicant conforms to the oil and Gas Lease EXHIBIT between Carl A. Miller (Lessor) and T,l` . P Co. (Lessee), effective January 27th, 1970 and recorded on July 31", 1970 with the Weld County Clerk and Recorder at reception number 15 2243. Please note that although the Anadarko entities and KMOG do not object to this application, we continue to assert our rights to make reasonable use of the surface of the property to develop our mineral interests, including but not limited to: accessing wells, pipelines, and related equipment located on the property. Please contact me at 720-929-3504 if you have any questions or comments about this matter. Sincerely, ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORPORATION C.7) Megan Bosma Landman cc: Jeff Fiske, Lead Counsel Ron Olsen Brett Cavanagh Don Jobe EXHIBIT MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission DATE: April 5, 2018 FROM: Ryder Reddick SUBJECT: Request to add one condition of approval prior to recording the plat to USR17-0064 Planning Commission Resolution After conducting a site visit at the property owned by Ms. Garcia on March 15, 2018 photographic evidence was taken showing evidence that the applicant had outdoor storage of materials for the business outside on their property. In the application questionnaire submitted to the planning department for USR17-0064 received on November 13, 2017 the applicants did not propose outdoor storage of materials or screening for the business on site other than the three commercial dump trucks to be stored onsite for the business. therefore, the Department of Planning Services formally requests that a condition of approval be added to the Planning Commission Resolution for USR17-0066 under Condition of Approval 1. Prior to recording the plat. The condition should state: All outdoor storage of materials related to the commercial business on site other than the three commercial dump trucks proposed in the application must be removed from the property prior to recording the plat. Photographic evidence shall be provided to the Weld County Department of Planning Services showing that outside storage of all commercial related items stored on the property have been removed from the site. Hello