The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20183145.tiffChloe Rempel From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Pam Gehringer <PGehringer@townofmead.org> Wednesday, September 26, 2018 4:02 PM Pam Gehringer Christopher Kennedy; Jeremiah Fettig Mead Warehouse Annexation & Zoning tdd from outside of Weld and know the content is safe, County Government. Do iot click REVIEW REFERRAL: PROJECT FILE# 2018-11 FROM: TOWN OF MEAD PLANNING DEPARTMENT Information on the proposal referenced below is available for your review and comment. Please see the instructions in this email for accessing information on this proposal. Project Name Mead Warehouse Project Type Annexation & Zoning Project Location Generally northwest of I-25/CR 34 intersection Zoning Mixed Use Comments Due By October 25, 2018 Planning Contact Jeremiah Fettig Email fettig • townofmead.or. Phone 970-805-4202 Public.iew 1O13/1$ cc: SacRs), PLC , Gm(mw/(runup), Pw( FP/ER/cf ), (Nr‘41..es cI/Q'1/it" 1 2018-3145 For external entities such as utility companies, special districts, property owner's associations or state agencies, please use the following instructions. Documents are available for your review on the Town of Mead Dropbox folder. Please use the following information to access the site: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/2kk8imtnp3yb59o/AAC1- vc 1 Dtg H 50 b j fJ 6vzYTAa ? d l =0 To provide comments, please complete referral form located in the dropbox and email to Jeremiah Fettig ifettig@townofmead.org Pam Gehringer Town of Mead Community Development Technician 2 Town of Mead 441 Third Street P.O. Box 626 970-535-4477 Mead, CO 80542 \\ \\ (0 \\ notincad.one LAND USE APPLICATION PAGE TWO MUST BE SIGNED AND NOTARIZED Project/Business Name Mead Mixed -Use Subdivision Project Address Northeast corner of 1-25 Frontage Road and County Road 34. Project Description 159.95 acre subdivision. Reconfiguration of two existing un-subdivided lots into four lots, plus right-of-way and easement dedications. Separate Initial Zoning, Preliminary Plat. and Administrative Site Plan (for 50.08 acres) applications submitted. Legal Description (Provide Subdivision, l.ot #. Block V or Attach Metes and 13uuntls) See attached legal description. Owner Name/Company (Attach Separate Sheets if Multiple) —WCR 34 & Hwy 25-220 LLC; c/o McRae Group of Companies Contact Person (If Different) Augustine Gomez Address/City/State/Zip 8800 N. Gainey Center Drive, Suite 255, Scottsdale, AZ 85285 Phone (480) 609-1200 Email Auggie@ronMcRae.com Fax (480) 609-1200 Authorized Representative Name/Company Scannell Properties, LLC. Attn: Chris Miller Address/City/State/Zip 8801 River Crossing Blvd, Suite 300, Indianapolis, IN 46240 Phone (317) 843-5959 Email ChrisM@ScannellProperties.com Fax Land Use Application Form 08/09 Page 1 of 2 Mineral Rights Owner/Lease Holder Name/Company (Attach Separate Sheets if Multiple) Grizzly Petroleum Company, LLC Address/City/State/Zip 1801 Broadway, Suite 500, Denver CO 80202 Service Providers Gas Xcel Water Little Thompson Water District Metro District Electric United Power Sewer Town of Mead Fire Mountain View Fire District Land Use Information Current Zoning A - Agriculture (Weld County) Proposed Zoning LI & HC Acres 159.95 # Lots/Units Proposed 4 Density (DU/Acre) N/A The undersigned is fully aware of the request/proposal being made and the actions being initiated on the referenced property. The undersigned understand that the application must be found to be complete by the Town of Mead before the request can officially be accepted and the development review process initiated The undersigned is aware that the applicant is fully responsible for all reasonable costs associated with the review of the application/request being made to the Town of Mead. Applicants shall pay all costs billed by the Town for legal, engineering and planning costs incurred by staff, including consultants acting on behalf of staff, necessary for project review. By this acknowledgement, the undersigned hereby certify that the above information is true and correct. WCR 34 & HWY 25-220. LLC. a Colorado limited liability company By. RMG Real Estate S mices XV. L.L.C., an Ar" one limited liability company, its Administrator Owner: Owner: Applicant: By tevia STATE OF COLODO ) ) SS. County of frkvsc .pe ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ia+h day of 3-L..,ber , 2011, by Au, tr<jrc e My commission expires: •if 63,9 Witness my hand and official sFal ••-•. its Authorized Officer Date: C%// Z//$` Date: Date: y((474? Land Use Application Form 08/09 Notary Public • S:ata ,)t Arizona MARICOPA COUNTY • 1.1v Comm Fvryrna Ann 14 NMI Page 2 of 2 OFFICIAL SEAL TWO PARCELS OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN THE RECORDS OF WELD COUNTY ON JUNE 15, 2006, AT RECEPTION NO. 3396398, LOCATED IN SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: CONSIDERING THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 11 TO BEAR N00°36'06"W, A DISTANCE OF 2638.70 FEET BETWEEN A FOUND 7/8" REBAR WITH 2" ALUMINUM CAP "2002 LS 29425 T3N R68W S10 S11" AT THE WEST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 11 AND A FOUND 3 1/4" ALUMINUM CAP PARTIALLY LEGIBLE "FREESE ENGR 1996 LS 4392" AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 11, WITH ALL BEARINGS CONTAINED HEREIN RELATIVE THERETO. COMMENCING AT THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 11; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 11 NORTH 00°36'06" WEST, 587.76 FEET TO A POINT ON THE THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE GREAT WESTERN RAILWAY; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, NORTH 74°52'15" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 93.09 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED AT RECEPTION NO. 3396398, AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, NORTH 74°52'15" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 2648.50 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AND ALONG THE EASTERLY, NORTHERLY AND SOUTHERLY LINES OF SAID PARCEL OF LAND THE FOLLOWING TEN (10) COURSES: 1) SOUTH 00°33'29" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1788.98 FEET; 2) THENCE NORTH 89°25'20" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 672.89 FEET; 3) THENCE SOUTH 00°21'26" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 794.32 FEET; 4) THENCE SOUTH 89°04'12" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 299.72 FEET; 5) THENCE SOUTH 89°49'42" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 82.79 FEET; 6) THENCE SOUTH 00'02'56" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 510.70 FEET; 7) THENCE NORTH 89°56'25" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 100.85 FEET; 8) THENCE SOUTH 55°20'11" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 472.42 FEET; 9) THENCE SOUTH 00°06'42" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 44.79 FEET; 10) THENCE SOUTH 37°08'42" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 201.09 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE GEORGE RATERINK ANNEXATION AS DESCRIBED IN THE RECORDS OF WELD COUNTY ON SEPTEMBER 4, 1985, AT RECEPTION NO.02023519, SAID NORTHERLY LINE ALSO BEING THE NORTHERLY LINE OF LOT 12, RATERINK SUBDIVISION AS DESCRIBED IN THE RECORDS OF WELD COUNTY ON MAY 9, 1986, AT RECEPTION NO. 02053088. THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINES OF SAID GEORGE RATERINK ANNEXATION AND RATERINK SUBDIVISION, AND ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINES OF RATERINK SUBDIVISION REPLAT "A" AS DESCRIBED IN THE RECORDS OF WELD COUNTY ON DECEMBER 21, 1994, THE FOLLOWING SIX (6) COURSES: 1) NORTH 82°18'46" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 395.39 FEET 2) THENCE NORTH 58°34'53" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 428.86 FEET; 3) THENCE NORTH 48°02'02" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1095.95 FEET; 4) THENCE NORTH 44°53'35" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1083.15 FEET; 5) THENCE NORTH 23°34'29" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 367.48 FEET; 6) THENCE SOUTH 89°35'07" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 49.98 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE WILFRIED SCHULZ ANNEXATION TO THE TOWN OF MEAD AS DESCRIBED IN THE RECORDS OF WELD COUNTY ON APRIL 5, 1988, AT RECEPTION NO. 02136726; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE, THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) COURSES: 1) NORTH 00°36'06" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 28.94 FEET; 2) THENCE NORTH 02°30'49" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 283.89 FEET; 3) THENCE NORTH 02°32'49" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 449.46 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. THUS DESCRIBED TRACT CONTAINS 6,967,619 SQ. FT. OR 159.95 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, TOGETHER WITH AND SUBJECT TO ALL EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS -OF -WAY EXISTING AND/OR OF PUBLIC RECORD. Town of Mead 441 Third Street P.O. Box 626 970-535-4477 Mead, CO 80542 y' vv.townofmcad.ortz LAND USE APPLICATION PAGE TWO MUST BE SIGNED AND NOTARIZED Project/Business Name Mead Mixed -Use Subdivision Project Address Northeast corner of 1-25 Frontage Road and County Road 34. Project Description 159.95 acre subdivision. Reconfiguration of two existing un-subdivided lots into four lots, plus right-of-way and easement dedications. Separate Annexation, Preliminary Plan, and Administrative Site Plan (for 50.08 acres) applications submitted. Legal Description (Provide Subdivision, I.ot Block It or Attach Metes and Bounds) Mead Mixed -Use Subdivision, Lots 1-4, Block 1 Owner Name/Company (Attach Separate Sheets if Multiple) Contact Person (If Different) Augustine Gomez WCR 34 & Hwy 25-220 LLC; c/o McRae Group of Companies Address/City/State/Zip 8800 N. Gainey Center Drive, Suite 255, Scottsdale, AZ 85285 Phone (480) 609-1200 Email Auggie@ronMcRae.com Fax (480) 609-1200 Authorized Representative Name/Company Scannell Properties, LLC. Attn: Chris Miller Address/City/State/Zip 8801 River Crossing Blvd, Suite 300, Indianapolis, IN 46240 Phone (317) 843-5959 Email ChrisM@ScannellProperties.com Fax Land Use Application Form 08/09 Page 1 of 2 Mineral Rights Owner/Lease Holder Name/Company (Attach Separate Sheets if Multiple) Grizzly Petroleum Company, LLC Address/City/State/Zip 1801 Broadway, Suite 500, Denver CO 80202 Service Providers Gas Xcel Electric United Power Water Little Thompson Water District Metro District Sewer Town of Mead Fire Mountain View Fire District Land Use Information Current Zoning A - Agricultural (Weld County) Acres 159.95 # Lots/Units Proposed 4 Proposed Zoning LI & HC Density (DU/Acre) N/A The undersigned is fully aware of the requesrproposal being made and the actions being initiated on the referenced property. The undersigned understand that the application must be found to be complete by the Town of Mead before the request can officially be accepted and the development review process initiated. The undersigned is aware that the applicant is fully responsible for all reasonable costs associated with the review of the application'request being made to the Town of Mead. Applicants shall pay all costs billed by the Town for legal. engineering and planning costs incurred by staff. including consultants acting on behalf of staff. necessary for project review By this acknowledgement, the undersigned hereby certify that the above information is true and correct. WCR 34 & HWY 25-220. LLC. a Colorado limited liability company By RMG Real Estate Sees XV. LL.C-. an Arizona limited liability company. its Administrator Owner: Fu, Owner: gts Aulhnri-nd 7Kcnr el Date: %Z -//,r Applicant: Date: ' ✓ (iff Date: 11* (?' L'� STATE OF C-OIaO La ) SS. County of 11.4lN;CoapZr, ) stn The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this I a day o by tY4nc /1/• 61crrr`� My commission expires: Witness my hand and official se lyt Land Use Application Form 08/09 4e.rt17G✓ 20 j5L. 1OFFICIAL SEAL - 4'o,. BENJAMIN JAMES McRAE Notary Public - State of Arizona • IrvtrtliVrptt.Wlrl t . �t1 My Comm. Expires Aug. 14, 20219 Page 2 of 2 Applicant's Certificate of Compliance Regarding Minerals With Article 65.5 of Title 24, Colorado Revised Statutes (H.B. 01-1088, Effective July 1, 2001) Certification I, Marc D. Pfleging of Scannell Properties, LLC, Applicant for the Mead Mixed -Use Subdivision development, hereby certify that I or my agent have examined the records in the Office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder to determine if any owners or lessees of any severed mineral estate in the property which is the subject of the proposed development can be identified, as required by Article 65.5 of Title 24, Colorado Revised Statues (also known as H.B. 01-1088 ("the Act"). Further, based on this examination, I have determined that: Mineral estate owners or lessees exist in the property to whom notice of the proposed development application will need to be sent as required by the Act. I certify that the information and exhibits I have submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. SCANNELL PROPERTIES, LLC By: Applicant Signature August 31, 2018 Date A copy of the mineral estate lease (Oil and Gas Lease dated July 10, 2013 between WCR 34 & HWY 25- 220, LLC and Grizzly Petroleum Company, LLC) regarding the property, which provides for the lessee to whom notice of the proposed development application will need to be sent as required by the Act, is attached to this Certificate. Grizzly Petroleum Company, LLC has an address of 1700 Broadway, Suite 650, Denver, CO 80290-1170. 3952631 08/01/2013 02:53 PM Total Pages: 4 Rec Fee: $26.00 Steve Moreno - Clerk and Recorder, Weld County, CO Modified PRODUCERS 88 -PAID UP OIL AND GAS LEASE THIS AGREEMENT, dated the 10"' of July, 2013, is made and entered Into by and between WCR 34 & HWY 23-220, LLC, whose address is 8800 N. Gainey Center Dr., Suite 225, Scottsdale, AZ 85258, hereinafter called Lessor (whether one or more) and GRIZZLY PETROLEUM COMPANY, LLC, whose address is 1700 Broadway, Suite 650. Denver. CO 80290-1170, hereinafter called Lessee. WITNESSETH, That the Lessor, for and in consideration of TEN AND MORE ($10.00+) DOLLARS cash in hand paid, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and the covenants and agreements hereinafter contained, has granted, demised, leased and let, and by these presents does grant, demise, lease and let exclusively unto the said Lessee, the land hereinafter described, with the exclusive right for the purpose of drilling, mining, exploring by geophysical and other methods, and developing, operating, and producing therefrom oil and all gas of whatsoever nature or kind, thereon to produce, save and take care of said hydrocarbon products, all that certain tract(s) of land situated in the County of Weld, State of Colorado, described as follows, to -wit See Exhibit "A", Legal Description, attached hereto and incorporated by this reference herein. Notwithstanding any particular description, it is nevertheless the intention of Lessor to Include within this lease and Lessor does hereby lease any lands and rights acquired or retained by Lessor by avulsion, accretion, reNction or otherwise as a result of a change in the boundaries or centerline of any river or stream traversing or adjoining the lands described above, as well as all riparian lands and rights which may be incident, appurtenant, related or attributed to Lessor in any lake, reservoir, stream or river traversing or adjoining the lands described in Exhibit A, and all lands included in any road, easement or right of way traversing the lands described In Exhibit A,. Lessee further grants Lessee, the right to use and easement under all of the lands for the purposes of exercising Lessee's rights under this lease, and the right of ingress and egress to the lands only for purposes of conducting seismic operations. 1. It is agreed that this lease shall remain in force for a tern of Three (3) years from this date and as long thereafter as oil or gas of whatsoever nature or kind Is produced from said leased premises or on acreage pooled therewith, or drilling operations are continued as hereinafter provided. If, at the expiration of the primary term of this lease, oil or gas Is not being produced on the leased premises or on acreage pooled therewith but Lessee is then engaged in drilling or re -working operations thereon, then this lease shall continue in force so long as operations are being continuously prosecuted on the leased premises or on acreage pooled therewith; and operations shall be considered to be continuously prosecuted if not more than one hundred twenty (120) days shall elapse between the completion or abandonment of one well and the beginning of operations for the drilling of a subsequent well. If after discovery of oil or gas on said land or on acreage pooled therewith, the production thereof should cease from any cause after the primary term, this lease shall not terminate if Lessee commences additional drilling or re -working operations within one hundred and twenty (120) days from date of cessation of production or from date of completion of dry hole. If oil or gas shall be discovered end produced as a result of such operations at or after the expiration of the primary term of this lease, this lease shall continue in force so long as oil or gas is produced in paying quantities from the leased premises or on acreage pooled therewith. In the event a well or wells is drilled and completed on the lands, or on the lands pooled therewith, for the purpose of developing coalbed gas, the word "operations" shall mean, in addition to those matters covered in the preceding paragraph. (1) operations of said wells to remove water or other substances from the coalbed, even though such operations do not result in the production of hydrocarbons rcr paying quantities, or (2) shutting -In or otherwise discontinuing production from said wells to allow for surface or underground mining affecting the drillsite or wellbore. 2. This is a PAID -UP LEASE. Unless otherwise stated herein, in consideration of the down cash payment, Lessor agrees that Lessee shall not be obligated, except as otherwise provided herein, to commence or continue any operations during the primary term. Lessee may at any time or times during or after the primary term surrender this lease as to all or any portion of said land and as to any strata or stratum by delivering to Lessor or by filing for record a release or releases, and be relieved of all obligation thereafter accruing as to the acreage surrendered. 3. In consideration of the premises the said Lessee covenants and agrees: 1°` To deliver to the credit of Lessor, free of cost, in the pipe line or tanks associated with the wells to which Lessee may connect wells on said land, the equal 18.75% part of an oil produced and saved from the leased premises. 2n° To pay Lessor on gas and casinghead gas produced from said land (1) when sold by Lessee, 18.75% of the proceeds derived from such sale or (2) when used by Lessee off said land or in the manufacture of gasoline or other products, the market value, at the mouth of the well, of 18.75% of such gas and casinghead gas. Post production costs shall not be deducted from Lessor's royalty. 3id To pay Lessor for gas produced from any oil well and used off the premises or in the manufacture of gasoline or any other product, a royalty of 18.75% of the proceeds, at the mouth of the well, payable monthly at the prevailing market rate. Lessor shall pay all local, state, or federal taxes associated with payments of royalties under this Paragraph 3. 4. Where oil and/or gas of whatsoever nature or kind, from a well capable of producing gas Is not sold or used, Lessee may pay or tender as royalty to the royalty owners One Dollar per year per net royalty acre retained hereunder, such payment or tender to be made on or before the anniversary date of this lease next ensuing after the expiration of 90 days from the date such well is shut in and thereafter on or before the anniversary date of this lease during the period such well Is shut In. If such payment or tender is made, it will be considered that oil and/or gas is being produced within the meaning of this lease. Payment of shut-in out or gas royalties shall not hold this Lease for more than two (2) consecutive years following expiration of the primary term. 5. If said Lessor owns a lesser Interest in the above described land than the entire and undivided fee simple estate therein, then the royalties (including any shut-in oil and/or gas royalty) herein provided for shall be paid the Lessor only in the proportion which Lessor's interest bears to the whole and undivided fee. 6. Lessee shall have the right to use, free of cost, gas and oil produced on said land, and any produced water resulting from Lessee's drilling and completions operations, for Lessee's operation thereon. 7. When requested by Lessor, Lessee shall bury Lessee's pipeline below plow depth. 8. No well shall be drilled nearer than 500 feet at the time of drilling to the house or barn on said premises without written consent of Lessor. 9. Lessee shall pay for damages caused by Lessee's operations to growing crops on said land. 10. Lessee shall have the right at any time to remove all machinery and fixtures placed on said premises, induding the right to draw and remove casing. 11. The rights of Lessor and Lessee hereunder may be assigned in whole or part. No change in ownership of Lessor's interest (by assignment or otherwise) shall be binding on Lessee until Lessee has been furnished with notice, consisting of certified copies of all recorded instruments or documents and other information necessary to establish a complete chain of record title form Lessor, and then only with respect to payments thereafter made. No other kind of notice, whether actual or constructive, shall be binding on Lessee. No present or future division of Lessor's ownership as to different portions or parcels of said land shall operate to enlarge the obligations or diminish the rights of Lessee, and all Lessees' operations may be conducted without regard to any such division. If all or any part of this lease is assigned, no leasehold owner shall be liable for any act or omission or any other leasehold owner. 1 3952631 08/01/2013 02:53 PM Page 2 of 4 12. Lessee, at its option, is hereby given the right and power at any time and from time to time as a recurring right, either before or after production, as to all or any part of the land described herein and as to any one or more of the formations hereunder, to communitize, pool or unitize the leasehold estate and the mineral estate covered by this lease with other land(s), lease or leases in the Immediate vicinity for the production of oil and gas, or separately for the production of either, when In Lessee's judgment it is necessary or advisable to do so, and irrespective of whether authority similar to this exists with respect to such other land, lease or leases. Likewise, units previously formed to Include formations not producing oil or gas, may be reformed to exclude such non -producing formations. The forming or reforming of any unit shall be accomplished by Lessee executing and filing of record a declaration of such unitization or reformation, which declaration shall describe the unit. Any unit may include land upon which a well has theretofore been completed or upon which operations for drilling have theretofore been commenced. Production, drilling or reworking operations or a well shut in for want of a market anywhere on a unit which includes all or a part of this lease shall be treated as if it were production, drilling or reworking operations or a well shut in for want of a market under this lease. In lieu of the royalties elsewhere herein specified, including shut-in oil and/or gas royalties, Lessor shall receive on production from the unit so communitized or pooled royalties only on the portion of such production allocated to the Lessor's interests covered by this lease; such allocation shall be that proportion of the unit production that the total number of surface acres covered by this lease and included in the unit bears to the total number of surface acres in such unit. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, pooling and unitization shall be limited to spacing, unitization, and pooling rules, regulations and/ or orders existing as of and subsequent to the date set forth above approved by the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, including units established pursuant to C.R.S. 34-60-118 for maintenance of pressure. Lessee shall have no right to commit the lands described In this Lease to a stale unit pursuant to C.R.S. 34-60.118 or federal exploratory unit without the consent of Lessor. 13. When operations or production are delayed or interrupted by fire, storm, flood, war rebellion, insurrection, riot, strike, or governmental delays in obtaining permits, approvals, or other allowances as a result of any non -financial cause beyond the control of Lessee, the time of such delay or interruption shall not be counted against Lessee and this lease shall remain in force during such delay or interruption and one hundred and twenty (120) days thereafter, anything in this lease to the contrary notwithstanding except that the provisions of this paragraph 13 shall not keep this Lease in effect for more than a period of eighteen (18) months from the date of any of the acts referenced above. 14. Lessor shall grant, sell, and convey to Lessee the right to conduct seismic operations on the lands set forth in Exhibit 'A', which shall include an exclusive right to a surface and mineral seismic permit. Lessee's seismic operations will be conducted in accordance with good standard practices and in a prudent and careful manner and Lessee and Its agents and contractors (collectively the "Lessee'), jointly and severally, will assume and pay, hold the Lessors free and harmless from, and indemnify and defend Lessors from any and all claims and damages Including, without limitation, attorney's fees and costs of court that may result from work by Lessee by virtue of the permission granted in this Agreement, with the exception of any claims or damages arising out of or related to the negligence, omission, or gross misconduct of the Lessor. This provision shall apply whether the daims are by persons or to property located on or off the Lands, including persons employed by Lessors and property owned by the Lessors. There shall be no additional consideration paid for purposes of utilizing the surface of the lands for Lessee's seismic operation. The parties agree that the consideration paid for this Agreement is not compensation for any such damages under this paragraph 14. All use of the surface of the leased lands for seismic operations shall cease after June 30, 2015. 15. Lessor agrees that the Lessee shall have the right at any time to redeem for Lessor, by payment, any mortgages, taxes or other liens on the above described lands, in the event of default of payment by Lessor and be subrogated to the rights of the holder thereof, and the undersigned Lessor, for itself and its heirs, successors and assigns, hereby surrender and release all right of dower and homestead in the premises described herein, insofar as said right of dower and homestead may in any way affect the purposes for which this lease is made, as recited herein. 16. Should any one or more of the parties hereinabove named as Lessor fail to execute this lease, it shall nevertheless be binding upon all such parties who do execute it as Lessor. The word "Lessor; as used in this lease, shall mean any one or more or all of the parties who execute this lease as Lessor. M the provisions of this lease shall be binding on the heirs, successors and assigns of Lessor and Lessee. 17. Additional Provisions: a. No Surface Occupancy. Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, this Lease is a "NO SURFACE OCCUPANCY Oil and Gas Lease and Lessee, its successors and assigns shall not conduct any operations or locate any facilities on the surface of the leased lands, excepting paragraph number fourteen, herein. b. Subsurface Easement. Lessee shall have the right to drill and operate wells through and under said lands, irrespective of the bottomhole locations of said wells. To this end, Lessor hereby grants and conveys to Lessee a subsurface easement for all purposes associated with such wells. Such right shall not include the right to install pipelines on the leased lands. c. Letter Agreement. This lease Is subject to the terms of a Letter Agreement executed by the Lessor and Lessee on the 10I day of July, 2013. Notwithstanding anything in this lease to the contrary, no additional consideration shall be paid for purposes of executing the Letter Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument Is executed as of the date first above written. LESSOR: STATE OF ARIZONA COUNTY OF MARICOPA WRC 34 & HWY 25-220, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company By: RMG Real Estate Services XV, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability comps y, its Adm' istrator C By: Ronald H. Rae, its Authorized Officer The foregoing Oil and Gas Lease was acknowledged before me this j day of �rl y 2013, by Ronald H. McRae, as Authorized Officer of RMG Real Estate Services XV, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company and Administrator of WRC 34 & HWY 25-220, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: 10131 `AV IS 2 3952631 08/01/2013 02:53 PM Page 3 of 4 LESSEE: GRIZZLY PETROLEUM COMPANY, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company , its Vice By: Steve STATE OF C DLD,PAAO )ss. COUNTY OF I)ENVE2 The foregoing Oil and Gas Lease was acknowledged before me Ihisa2rfay of . /UL,7 2013, by Steve R. Stacy, as Vice President of GRIZZLY PETROLEUM COMPANY, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: dId4/7 KRISTI NE E ZAHN N0PRY PUBLIC MATE OF COLORADO Comoloskin 2°X1°t°°°tbytes o 0)2Dt7 3 3952631 08/01/2013 02:53 PM Page 4 of 4 piJ1IBIT "A" - Leaal Descriutiort Made a part of and attached to that Oil and Gas Lease dated July 10, 2013 between WCR 34 & HWY 25.220, LLC and GRIZZLY PETROLEUM COMPANY, LLC 218.503 acres, more or less, situated in the W12 and SE/4 of Section 11, T3N, R68W, Weld County, Colorado as more particularly described as the following Two (2) Tracts: TRACT 1 (Two Parcels): 160 acres, more or less, consisting of Two (2) 80 acre tracts as described in that certain Special Warranty Deed dated June 7, 2006 from MILLER MOTOR SPORTS PARK, a Utah Limited Liability Company to WCR 34 & HWY 25-220, LLC, a Colorado Limited Liability Company, recorded in Rec. # 3396398 Parcel I of Tract 1: That portion of Section 11, Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6d.' P.M., Weld County, Colorado. More particularly described as follows: Considering the West line of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 11 as bearing North 00'28'37" East and with all bearings contained herein relative thereto. Commencing at the West Quarter Comer of said Section 11; Thence along the West line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 11; North 00'28'37" East, 587.75 feet to the Southerly line of the Great Western Railway; Thence along the Southerly line , North 75"56'39 East (record N. 75"50' E.) 93.10 feet to the true POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence continuing along said Southerly Line North 75'56'39' East, 2648.61 feet to the North -South Centerline of said Section 11; Thence along said centerline, South 00"30'05" West 1789.30 Feet, Thence South 89"29'55" East 672.74 Feet; Thence South 00'43'19" West 794.32 feet, Thence North 89"49'41" West 300.00 Feet; Thence North 88"58'45" West, 82.76 feet; Thence North 51'10'59' West, 2384.41 feet; Thence North 90"00'00" West 1004.00 feet to the Easterly line of Interstate Highway 25; Thence along said Eastlerty line North 03"35'37" East (Record N. 02'49'30" E.), 450.00 feet to the true Point of Beginning. County of Weld, State of Colorado. Parcel II of Tract I: That portion of Section 11, Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6'° P.M., Weid County Colorado. More particularly described as follows: Considering the West line of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 11 as bearing North 00"28'37' East and with all bearings contained herein relative thereto. Commencing at the West Quarter Corner of said Section 11; Thence along the West line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 11; North 00"28'37" East, 587.75 feet to the Southerly line of the Great Western Railway; Thence along the Southerly line , North 75'56'39 East (record N. 75.50' E.) 93.10 feet; Thence along the Easterly line of Interstate Highway 25, South 03"35'37" West, 450.00 feet to the True POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence South 90'00'00" East 1004.00 feet; Thence South 51"10'59' East, 2384.41 feet Thence South 00"52'30" West 510.57 feet: to the Northerly line of that certain Tract Platted as a Recorded Exemption in the Weld County Records; Thence along the Northerly and Westerly lines of said Recorded Exemption the following four (4) courses and distances; (1) South 89"33'46" West (Record N. 89'22'55' W.), 100.71 feet: (2) South 56"42'25' West (Record N. 55'37'52" E.), 472.45 feet; (3) South 00'53'32" West (Record S. 00'11'01" E.), 44.70 feet (4) South 36"08'28' East (Record S. 37'13'01" E.), 200.70 feet; Thence along the Northerly lines of the Raterink Subdivision the following six (6) courses and distances: (1) North 81"18'32' West, 394.61 feet: (2) North 57"30'28' West, 429.00 feet (3) North 46'57'37' West 1096.31 feet: (4) North 43"49'10" West, 1083.51 feet: (5) North 22'30'04' West, 367.60 feet: (6) North 89"20'28" West, 50.00 feet to the Easterly line of Interstate Highway 25; Thence along said Easterly Ane the following two (2) courses and distances: (1) Parallel with and 50.00 feet perpendicularly east of the West line of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 11. North 00'28'37" East 28.94 feet: (2) North 03"35'37' East (Record N. 02'49'30' E.), 283.35 feet to the true POINT OF BEGINNING, County of Weld, State of Colorado. TRACT 2 (Lots 2-11): 58.503 acres, more or less, known as Lots 2-11, Raterink Subdivision according to the plat recorded in R2419753 as described in that certain Special Warranty Deed dated June 7, 2006 from MILLER MOTOR SPORTS PARK, a Utah Limited Liability Company to WCR 34 & HWY 25-220, LLC, a Colorado Limited Liability Company, recorded in Rec. # 3396394 all recorded in the Real Property Records of Weld County, Colorado. Further described as Lots 2 Through 11, Raterink Subdivision, Replat "A.' according to the Plat Recorded December 21, 1994 in Book 1472 as Reception No. 2419753, County of Weld, State of Colorado. 4 IBrownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck September 4, 2018 Town of Mead Planning and Zoning Development Attn: Chris Kennedy, Planning Director 441 Third Street Mead, CO 80542 Re: Cover Letter to Application for Annexation, Initial Zoning, Subdivision, and Site Plan Application Mr. Kennedy: We represent Scannell Properties, LLC (the "Developer") with respect to its acquisition and development of the approximately 51.68 acres of vacant land generally located at the southeast corner of Interstate 25 and the Great Western Railroad, as more particularly described on the attached Exhibit A (the `Scannell Property"), in unincorporated Weld County, Colorado. The Developer is the contract purchaser of the Scannell Property from WCR 34 & HWY 25-220, LLC (the "Seller"), which also owns the approximately 108.27 acres that is adjacent to the Scannell Property to the south and east as more particularly described on the attached Exhibit B (the "Seller's Property"). The Scannell Property and the Seller's Property shall be referred to together as the "Property." The Developer and the Seller both desire to annex the Property into the Town of Mead, Colorado (the "Town"), to zone the Scannell Property as Light Industrial and the Seller's Property as Highway Commercial, to subdivide the Property into four parcels comprised of the Scannell Property, the Seller's Property, and dedicated right-of-way, and to obtain approval of a Site Plan for the Scannell Property. The Developer and Seller have submitted applications to the Town to obtain the foregoing entitlements and approvals This letter is delivered in connection with such application to provide the Town with additional information that may aid the Town in reviewing and approving the proposed annexation, initial zoning, Sketch Plan, Preliminary Plat, and Site Plan. BACKGROUND The Developer is under contract to purchase the Scannell Property from Seller, and intends to develop a 129,845 square foot commercial truck and dock terminal with 194 bays, an attached 9,990 square foot related office space, 7,150 square feet of breakroom pods, a 18,091 square foot maintenance building, a 192 square foot lube shed, a 105 square foot guard house, and a fueling station with a 3,000 square foot canopy (the "Project"). The Project will have a maximum height of 25 feet, a total Floor Area Ratio of 0.08, 18.97 acres of landscapes areas (which equates to about 36.7% of the Scannell Property), 234 traditional parking spaces, 214 short/pup trailer 17210969.4 staging spaces, 235 long/van staging spaces, 148 semi -truck staging spaces, 16 breakdown staging spaces, and 5 bicycle parking spaces. The Developer intends to lease the Project to an undisclosed global end user. Access to the Project will come directly off of the Interstate 25 Frontage Road, just south of where it intersects with the Great Western Railroad. The access drive can later be extended to serve the Seller's Property upon development. As shown on the Site Plan and corresponding Overall Landscape Plan, the 18.97 acres of landscaping will consist of a mix of trees, shrubs, and other vegetation intended to provide both an aesthetically pleasing palate and a visual buffer along the property lines. The perimeter landscaping will lie adjacent to a fence that plays an important role in securing the property for the end user, but also complements the landscaping and fits within the intent of the Highway Design Overlay District, which would apply to the Property upon annexation. ANALYSIS The remainder of this letter will discuss how the applications for annexation, initial zoning, Sketch Plan, Preliminary Plat, and Site Plan satisfy the applicable criteria for approval provided in the Town's Municipal Code (the "Code"). I. Criteria for Approval of an Annexation As described above, the Developer and Seller propose to annex the Property into the Town. Chapter 16, Article 8 of the Code along with the Colorado Municipal Annexation Act of 1965 (the "Act") establish the processes and requirements for annexing annexations. Until recently, the Code contained numerous requirements for an annexation in addition to those required by the Act. However, the Town recently adopted Ordinance No. 876, which amended the Code to conform with the requirements and process in the Act. While Council has approved this Code amendment, it is not yet in effect as of the submittal of this application for annexation. However, the Town Attorney has advised that the application should be submitted on the assumption that the amendment will take effect, and should comply with the Code's requirements for annexation as amended; and that if it does comply with the amended requirements, the Town will accept the application as complete. Therefore, what follows is an explanation of how the application to annex the Property complies with the requirements in the Code (as amended) and Act for approval of an annexation. 1. The proposed annexation shall conform with the requirements in state statute. The Code (as amended by Ordinance No. 876) requires that annexations conform with the requirements of the Act in order to be approved. Therefore, we will analyze whether the proposed annexation complies with the material requirements of the Act as applicable to the proposed annexation of the Property. a. Consent of the Landowners Except in limited circumstances, an annexation may only be approved with the consent of the landowners of the property subject to the annexation, which can be demonstrated through a 2 17210969.4 public election or through submittal of an annexation petition that is "signed by persons comprising more than fifty percent of the landowners in the area and owning more than fifty percent of the area, excluding public streets, and alleys and any land owned by the annexing municipality." Colo. Const. Art. II, Section 30; C.R.S. § 31-12-104(1). Here, Seller is the sole owner of the Property and has signed the petition for annexation attached to the annexation application. b. One -Sixth Contiguity Further, the subject property must meet a minimum contiguity requirement. More specifically, the Town must find that "not less than one -sixth of the perimeter of the area proposed to be annexed is contiguous with the annexing municipality." C.R.S. §31-12-104(1)(a). While the Property is contiguous to the Town on its entire western and southern property lines, far exceeding the one -sixth contiguity requirement in the Act, as currently platted, the Property consists of two parcels, with the southern parcel representing the majority of the portion of the Property that is contiguous with the Town. However, the Act provides that "contiguity may be established by the annexation of one or more parcels in a series," meaning the northern parcel of the Property can satisfy the contiguity requirement so long as the southern parcel is annexed at the same time, in which case the contiguity of the northern and southern parcels will be combined for purposes of satisfying the one -sixth contiguity requirement. Id. Therefore, the Property satisfies the one -sixth contiguity requirement in the Act. c. Community of Interest The Town must also find that "a community of interest exists between the area proposed to be annexed and the annexing municipality; that said area is urban or will be urbanized in the near future; and that said area is integrated with or is capable of being integrated with the annexing municipality." C.R.S. § 31-12-104(l)(b). However, the fact that the subject property has satisfied the one -sixth contiguity requirement described above "shall be a basis for a finding of compliance with these requirements," unless certain facts are demonstrated at a hearing to prove, essentially, that the adult residents of the subject property do not use the services provided in the annexing municipality or work in the annexing municipality, that the landowners intend to dedicate the subject property exclusively to agricultural use for at least the next 5 years, and that it would not be physically practicable to extend municipal services to the subject property. Id. In other words, if the subject property is sufficiently contiguous with the annexing municipality, it is assumed that they share a community of interest unless it can be proven that they are in fact incompatible. Here, because the Property satisfies the one -sixth contiguity requirement, it is assumed that it satisfies he above requirements regarding the existence of a community of interest between the Property and the Town. Moreover, by virtue of submitting the applications for initial zoning, Sketch Plan, Preliminary Plat, and Site Plan, the Developer has clearly indicated its intent to develop the Scannell Property and to connect to Town services. Therefore, a community of interest exists between the Property and the Town. 3 17210969.4 2. Annexation Agreement. The Developer and Seller will each submit a draft Annexation Agreement to the Town for review for their respective properties. The Annexation Agreements will be on the Town's form, subject to revisions specific to each property and the Project, which have been previously discussed with the Town's staff, such as to include vested rights. The Developer and Seller believe it is appropriate to have separate Annexation Agreements for the Scannell Property and Seller's Property because the Project will be developed immediately whereas the Seller's Property may not be developed for some time. Having separate agreements allows each agreement to address concerns unique to each property without impacting development on the other property. II. Initial Zoning The Developer has requested that the Town approve Light Industrial as the initial zoning for the Scannell Property and the Seller has requested that the Town approve Highway Commercial as the initial zoning for the Seller's Property. Per Section 16-3-10(4)(a) of the Code, "[z]oning of land during annexation may be done in accordance with the procedure and notice requirements" of Chapter 16, Article III of the Code. The Code does not provide specific criteria for approval of an initial zoning (as opposed to an application for a rezoning of a property already within the Town). Therefore, we will turn to other Town plans to determine whether Light Industrial and Highway Commercial zoning are the best fits for the Scannell Property and the Seller's Property, respectively. 1. Scannell Property — Light Industrial The Town's Comprehensive Plan ("Comp Plan") designates a significant portion of the Seller's Property and about the southern half of the Scannell Property as within the Downtown Sub -Area. This area is intended to be the "focal point of the community" and a "gathering point and vibrant destination," though the Comp Plan is clear that these intentions are centered around the portion of the Sub -Area that is west of Interstate 25 zoned DMU along the Main Street and Welker Avenue Corridors. Comp Plan, p. 50-51. As the "gateway to Old Town," development in the Downtown Sub -Area should leave a positive impression on people entering Mead. Id. The Town's Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map more specifically designates the Scannell Property primarily as "Planned Industrial Mixed Use." The Comp Plan states that the appropriate zone district for Planned Industrial Mixed Use areas is Light Industrial, and describes such areas as intended for "Wight manufacturing and processing operations within an enclosed structure or development with a mix of office, light industrial, and limited retail service uses." Comp Plan, p. 46. They are "[i]ntended to create an attractive, business park or campus -style settings." Id. The Project is a mixed -use facility with office and light industrial uses. Further, the Project offers an attractive design, with the street -facing office space presenting an upscale design that presents the positive initial impression the Town desires in the Downtown Sub -Area. Therefore, the Project is well -suited for Light Industrial zoning within the Downtown Sub -Area. Light Industrial zoning is "primarily intended to accommodate light manufacturing uses within an enclosed structure or development that provides for a mix of office, light industrial and 4 I7?10969.4 limited retail service uses in attractive, business park settings." Code, § 16-3-30(a)(2)(d). However, the Comp Plan notes that the Town intends to create a new Business Park zone district that will differentiate campus -style business parks from more traditional light industrial uses. Comp Plan, p. 79. The Project is a mix of office and light industrial. The intended uses at the Project all fit within uses that are allowed by right in Light Industrial zoning, including "general office," "deliver and dispatch service, vehicles on -site," "indoor operation, with outdoor loading docks." Code, § 16-3-40. Light Industrial also permits a wide variety of fuel- and service -related uses by right that would allow for the maintenance shop and fueling station uses at the Project, including "auto & light truck repair," "all other vehicle repair," "gasoline service station," "fuel sale, automotive/appliance," "fuel sales, heavy vehicle," "quick lubrication," "all other vehicle service, limited," and "tire recapping & storage." Code, § 16-3-40. Therefore, the Project fits perfectly within the definition of Light Industrial use, especially considering the Town's intent to amend the Code to separate business parks into a separate zone district. Further, the Project complies with the design and site standards for Light Industrial zoning. The maximum building height of 25 feet is less than the allowed maximum height of 40 feet; the lot is larger than the minimum 1 acre; the Project complies with the minimum 20 -foot setback from streets, 0 -foot side setback, and 25 -foot rear setback applicable to Light Industrial zoning; lot coverage is only 63.3% which is less than the 80% maximum; and FAR is 0.08, which is less than the maximum FAR of 0.25. Code, § 16-3-80. Because the Property is within one quarter mile of Interstate 25, it must also comply with the design standards in the Highway Design Overlay District. Code, § 16-2-220(a). The Developer has considered these standards in the design of the improvements for the Project. Therefore, given the mix of uses and site design, the inclusion of the Scannell Property within the Downtown Sub -Area and Highway Design Overlay District, and the designation as Planned Industrial Mixed Use, Light Industrial zoning is the correct initial zoning for the Scannell Property. 2. Seller's Property — Highway Commercial The Future Land Use Map designates the Seller's Property as "Business Park," which are areas intended to be developed as "campus -style office and employment uses with integrated open space." Comp Plan, p. 46. The Comp Plan states that the appropriate zone district for Business Park areas is the to -be -created Business Park zone district and notes that two new Business Park areas were added to the Future Land Use Map within the Downtown Sub -Area in the approximate location of the Seller's Property. Comp Plan, p. 46, 51. Because the Town has not yet amended the Code to create the Business Park zone district, we must look for the next best fit for the Seller's Property. Highway Commercial zoning is "intended to accommodate retail, office and service uses conducted entirely indoors." Code, § 16-3-30(a)(2)(b). The Highway Commercial district "promotes well -designed development on sites that provide excellent transportation access," and "typically is located adjacent to major arterials." Id. Highway Commercial zoning is the closest approximation of the future Business Park zoning It also fits the Seller's Property well considering its location adjacent to Interstate 25 between State Highways 34 and 36 and the 5 17210969.4 planned interchange at the intersection of Interstate 25 and State Highway 36. While the Seller has not proposed a specific development program, it intends to develop the Seller's Property for uses consistent with Highway Commercial zoning. Given that the Code has not yet been amended to create such a zone district, Highway Commercial is the best fit for the Seller's Property. Though Highway Commercial and General Commercial share many allowed uses, Highway Commercial does not allow for some of the more controversial uses allowed under General Commercial, such as jails and transmission lines, or some of the more industrial -type uses, such as feed stores or manufacturing/processing, while still providing sufficient flexibility for most general retail, office, and mixed uses. Because the Seller's Property is generally located along Interstate 25 and is designated as Business Park on the Future Land Use Map, Highway Commercial is the most appropriate initial zone district for the Seller's Property. III. Criteria for Approval of a Sketch Plan and Preliminary Plat The Property is not currently configured as the Scannell Property and Seller's Property. Rather, it is comprised of two separate parcels that split the Property diagonally, as depicted on Exhibit C. Therefore, in order to reconfigure the property lines into the Scannell Property and Seller's Property, the Property will have to be resubdivided. Because the Property is greater than 10 acres in size, this must be processed as a Major Subdivision. Code, § 16-4-40(a)(1)(c). The Major Subdivision process consists of the three approvals: Sketch Plan, Preliminary Plat, and Final Plat. Code, § 16-4-40(a)(2). The Code provides that the Sketch Plan and Preliminary Plat may be processed concurrently, and the Town's Planning Director has recommended that the Developer and Seller submit a combined Sketch Plan and Preliminary Plat for review. Code, § 16-4-40(a)(3). The Final Plat will be submitted for review and approval at a later date. A Sketch Plan and Preliminary Plat each has its own criteria for approval. What follows is an explanation of how the submitted applications satisfy each of the applicable criteria for approval. 1. Sketch Plan a. The land use mix within the project conforms to the Town of Mead Zoning District Map and furthers the goals and policies of the Town Comprehensive Plan including: (i) The proposed development promotes the Town's small town, rural character; As discussed above under annexation, the Property and the Town share a "community of interest." The Town has made policy decisions regarding future uses and development within the Town, and has adopted the Comp Plan and zone districts in the Code to memorialize those policy decisions. The Developer proposes that the Scannell Property be zoned Light Industrial and Seller proposes that the Seller's Property be zoned Highway Commercial, each of which come with the uses specified by the Town in the Code. The Project on the Scannell Property would fit 6 I72I0909.4 squarely within the uses allowed by right under Light Industrial zoning, and though Seller does not yet have a development plan for its property, it can be assumed that it envisions the types of uses allowed in Highway Commercial. In the Comp Plan, the Town designated the Scannell Property primarily as "Planned Industrial Mixed Use and the Seller's Property as Business Park, and both properties as within the Downtown Sub -Area. Rural areas often contain the types of light industrial uses proposed on the Scannell Property and concentrate their commercial office and retail uses along the interstate, just as the Sketch Plan provides. (ii) Proposed residential development adds diversity to the Town's housing supply; Not applicable. Not residential development is proposed at this time. (iii) Proposed commercial development will benefit the Town's economic base; The Project is a substantial facility for a global end user that will bring 138 full-time jobs to the Town. Those employees and the truck drivers who visit the facility on a regular basis to drop and pick-up loads will contribute to the Town's economic base. Future development of the Seller's Property will likewise bring additional jobs to the Town and contribute significantly to the Town's economic base. (iv) Parks and open space are incorporated into the site design; Because the Project is not in proximity to any residential uses, it would not be appropriate to required that it include public parks into its design. However, the Project does include approximately 18.97 acres of landscapes areas (which equates to about 36.7% of the Scannell Property), which will add a visually pleasing element to the frontage along Interstate 25 as drivers pass through or come into the Town. In response to the Town's open space requirements, the Developer will set aside approximately 6 acres for open space, and the Seller will also set aside a minimum of 8% of the net land area for open space upon development. (v) The proposed project protects the Town's environmental quality; and The Town has adopted certain standards pertaining to environmental issues, such as minimum landscaping and maximum lot coverage requirements and protections for natural areas. Fortunately, based on currently available information, the Scannell Property does not have any critical habitats or similar natural areas that could be impacted by the proposed Project or other future development, such as wetlands, floodplains and floodways, wildlife travel corridors, nesting sites, or significant native trees and vegetation. The Project does comply with all of the design and site planning standards in the Code that bear a relationship to the environment, such as by providing more than the minimum required landscaping. The Seller's Property does have some wetlands; however, there is no present intention to develop or otherwise affect the wetlands, and any impacts to the wetlands resulting from development of the Project or any future development will be mitigated in conformance with all applicable state and federal permits. 7 I72I0969.4 (vi) The development enhances cultural, historical, educational and/or human service opportunities. The Project does not contain a specific cultural, historical, educational, or human service component. However, it is not necessary to further all of the factors listed above under this criteria (a), only enough to justify satisfaction of the criteria. Based on the information provided above and in the Sketch Plan itself, the Sketch Plan satisfies criteria (a) because it promotes the Town's rural character, will benefit the Town's economic base, and lives up to the Town's standards for environmental quality. b. The sketch plan represents a functional system of land use and is consistent with the rationale and criteria set forth in this code and the Town Comprehensive Plan. As discussed at length above, the annexation of the Property, the initial zoning to Light Industrial and Highway Commercial, and the development of the Project are all in line with the intended future land uses for the Property described in the Comp Plan. The proposed Project provides a functional system of land use that will be compatible with, but also buffered from, future development on the Seller's Property. Therefore, this criteria of approval is satisfied. c. The utility and transportation design is adequate, given existing and planned capacities of those systems. For its size, the Project will not be an intensive user of utilities, and the utility infrastructure already in existence will be adequate to serve the Project as supplemented by off -site water and sanitary sewer extensions from Weld County Road 34 to the Scannell Property. In addition, while the Project will attract regular truck traffic, that traffic will travel directly from the Scannell Property to Interstate 25 along the Frontage Road. The Developer has requested approval to construct a right -turn lane at the intersection of the Frontage Road and the driveway to the Scannell Property to allow for the wider turning radius for larger trucks, at the Developer's sole cost and expense. This new turn lane will minimize the impact of truck traffic on the Frontage Road by allowing trucks to turn into the Project without significantly reducing their speed to negotiate the turn. Therefore, this criteria of approval is satisfied. d. Negative impacts on adjacent land uses have been identified and satisfactorily mitigated. The eventual Project is not expected to have material negative impacts on adjacent land uses, which are primarily agricultural, railway, or Interstate 25. Directly southwest of the Scannell Property is an existing U -Haul facility, which will be compatible with the intended Project and eventual development of the Seller's Property for Highway Commercial uses. To the extent any negative impacts do exist, they will be substantially mitigated by the robust landscaping buffer along the entire perimeter of the Scannell Property, the proposed fence, and sheer distance between the Project and surrounding uses. 8 7210969.4 Finally, as described above, the Developer intends to construct a right -turn lane coming from the Frontage Road into the Project to minimize the impact on Frontage Road traffic. This will help mitigate the additional traffic expected from development of the Project by allowing the trucks to turn smoothly into the Project without forcing trucks to significantly decrease their speed. The access drive into the Project is designed such that it can later be extended into the Seller's Property to provide access to future development. The Traffic Study and CDOT recommend that dedicated right turn lanes be constructed at the Interstate 25 off -ramps. The Developer has offered to pay their proportional share for the proposed improvements into a Town escrow account to be used for the dedicated right turn lanes future construction. Therefore, this criteria of approval is satisfied. e. There is a need or desirability within the community for the applicant's development and the development will help achieve a balance of land use and/or housing types within Mead, according to Mead's goals. The Sketch Plan contemplates development of the Project and future development of the Seller's Property for Highway Commercial Uses. As described in detail above, these proposed uses fulfill the intent of the Comp Plan to develop the Scannell Property for Planned Industrial Mixed Use and the Seller's Property for Business Park uses. The mixed Light Industrial uses on the Scannell Property will complement and balance the eventual commercial office, retail, and similar uses on the Seller's Property. The fact that the Town has selected these properties for the types of development being proposed indicates that the Town has forecasted a need and desirability for these very types of development on the Property. Therefore, this criteria of approval is satisfied. 2. Preliminary Plat a. The preliminary plat represents a functional system of land use and is consistent with the rationale and criteria set forth in this code and the Town Comprehensive Plan. The Preliminary Plat satisfies this criteria in the same manner and for the same reasons as the Sketch Plan. b. The application is consistent with the approved sketch plan and incorporates the Planning Commission's recommendations and conditions of approval. The Preliminary Plat is consistent with the Sketch Plan, which is being submitted for approval contemporaneously with the Preliminary Plat. To the extent the Planning Commission has any recommendations or conditions of approval for the Preliminary Plat, the Developer and Seller will work diligently with the Town to agree on how best to incorporate them into the Preliminary Plat at that time. 9 I7?I0969.4 Therefore, this criteria of approval is satisfied. c. The land use mix within the project conforms to the Town's Zoning District Map and Land Use Map and furthers the goals and policies of the Town Comprehensive Plan including: (i) The proposed development promotes the Town's small town, rural character; (ii) Proposed residential development adds diversity to the Town's housing supply; (iii) Proposed commercial development will benefit the Town's economic base; (iv) Parks and open space are incorporated into the site design; (v) The proposed project protects the Town's environmental quality; and (vi) The development enhances cultural, historical, educational and/or human service opportunities. The Preliminary Plat satisfies this criteria in the same manner and for the same reasons as the Sketch Plan. d. The utility and transportation design is adequate, given existing and planned capacities of those systems. The Preliminary Plat satisfies this criteria in the same manner and for the same reasons as the Sketch Plan. e. Negative impacts on adjacent land uses have been identified and satisfactorily mitigated. The Preliminary Plat satisfies this criteria in the same manner and for the same reasons as the Sketch Plan. f. There is a need or desirability within the community for the applicant's development and the development will help achieve a balance of land use and/or housing types within the Town of Mead. The Preliminary Plat satisfies this criteria in the same manner and for the same reasons as the Sketch Plan. IV. Criteria for Approval of a Site Plan Development of the Project requires approval of a Site Plan. Code, § 16-4-100(a). The proposed Site Plan complies with all criteria for approval set forth in the Code, as described below. 10 I 72 0969.4 1. All of the information required on a site plan is shown. The Site Plan contains all information required to be shown by the Code, as described in Section 16-4-100(b)(3) of the Code. Therefore, this criteria of approval is satisfied. 2. The lot size and lot dimensions are consistent with what is shown on the approved final plat. The Site Plan is consistent with the Preliminary Plat and Sketch Plan, both of which are being submitted for review and approval concurrent with the Site Plan. The Site Plan will also be consistent with the Final Plat, which will be submitted for review and approval in the next couple weeks. Therefore, this criteria of approval will be satisfied. 3. No buildings or structures infringe on any easements. No buildings within the Project infringe upon any easements known to the Developer. Therefore, this criteria of approval is satisfied. 4. The proposed site grading is consistent with the requirements of any applicable adopted storm drainage criteria or master drainage plans. The site grading proposed for the Project, as depicted on the Site Plan, is consistent with the requirements in the Code and Town plans. The Developer intends to construct water quality and detention facilities for the Scannell Property in accordance with Town criteria. All facilities will discharge according to historical drainage patterns. Therefore, this criteria of approval is satisfied. 5. The density and dimensions shown conform with the Town density and dimensional standards or the approved PUD requirements. The Project depicted on the Site Plan conforms with the Town's density and dimensional standards, as described above in this letter, such as setback requirements, lot coverage, and maximum height. Therefore, this criteria of approval is satisfied. 6. The applicable provisions of this Code have been adequately addressed and the proposed improvements conform to this Code. As described throughout this letter, the buildings and other improvements proposed for the Project, as well as the intended uses, all conform to the Code. The buildings comply with all design and dimensional standards, the intended uses are all allowed under the requested Light Industrial zoning, and the Project as a whole complies with the intent for development of this Scannell Property as expressed in the Comp Plan. Therefore, this criteria of approval is satisfied. V. Conclusion I hope this letter has provides a helpful summary of the proposed annexation, Sketch Plan, Preliminary Plat, and Site Plan, and how each satisfies the applicable criteria for approval in the 11 17210969.4 Code. The Developer and Seller respectfully request approval of their applications, and look forward to developing successful projects in the Town of Mead. 12 I72I0969.4 I Brownstein Hyatt I Farber Schreck Exhibit A Description of Scannell Property THAT PORTION OF A PARCEL OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN THE RECORDS OF WELD COUNTY ON JUNE 15, 2006, AT RECEPTION NO. 3396398, LOCATED IN THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: CONSIDERING THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 11 TO BEAR N00°36'06"W, A DISTANCE OF 2638.70 FEET BETWEEN A FOUND 7/8" REBAR WITH 2" ALUMINUM CAP "2002 LS 29425 T3N R68W S10 Sl 1" AT THE WEST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 11 AND A FOUND 3 1/4" ALUMINUM CAP PARTIALLY LEGIBLE "FREESE ENGR 1996 LS 4392" AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 11, WITH ALL BEARINGS CONTAINED HEREIN RELATIVE THERETO. COMMENCING AT THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 11; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 11 NORTH 00°36'06" WEST, 587.76 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE GREAT WESTERN RAiLWAY; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, NORTH 74°52'15" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 93.09 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED AT RECEPTION NO. 3396398, AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, NORTH 74°52'15" EAST. A DISTANCE OF 1183.55 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, SOUTH 25°05'38" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1672.43 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 64°55'25" WLST, A DISTANCE OF 1161.97 FEET; THENCE 363.13 FEET ALONG THE ARE OF A NON -TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1250.00 FEET, AN INCLUDED ANGLE OF 16°38'41" AND SUBTENDED BY A CHORD BEARING NORTH 29°34'07" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 361.85 FEET; THENCE NORTH 40°04'02" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 317.06 FEET; THENCE 1042.97 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON -TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1449.96 FEET, AN INCLUDED ANGLE OF 41°12'48", AND SUBTENDED BY A CHORD BEARING NORTH 22°57'13" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1020.63 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87°03'l I" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 27.60 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF INTERSTATE 25 FRONTAGE ROAD; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, NORTH 02°32'49" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 199.74 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL CONTAINING 2,251,209 SQ.FT. OR 51.68 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. I72I0969.4 Exhibit B Description of Seller's Property KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT WCR 34 AND HWY 25-220, LLC, BEING THE OWNER OF PROPERTY IN WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, EXCLUSIVE OF RIGHTS -OF -WAY, BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A PORTION OF TWO PARCELS OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN THE RECORDS OF WELD COUNTY ON JUNE 15, 2006, AT RECEPTION NO. 3396398, AND A PORTION OF THE GREAT WESTERLY RAILWAY AS DESCRIBED ON MARCH 10, 1906 IN BOOK 234, AT PAGES 92-115 LOCATED IN SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: CONSIDERING THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 11 TO BEAR N00°36'06"W, A DISTANCE OF 2638.70 FEET BETWEEN A FOUND 7/8" REBAR WITH 2" ALUMINUM CAP "2002 LS 29425 T3N R68W S10 S I I" AT THE WEST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 11 AND A FOUND 3 1/4" ALUMINUM CAP PARTIALLY LEGIBLE "FREESE ENGR 1996 LS 4392" AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 11, WITH ALL BEARINGS CONTAINED HEREIN RELATIVE THERETO. COMMENCING AT THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 11; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 11 NORTH 00°36'06" WEST, 587.76 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE GREAT WESTERN RAILWAY; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, NORTH 74°52'15" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 82.59 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 25 FRONTAGE ROAD, AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE, NORTH 00°36'06" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 41.32 FEET TO A POINT ON THE CENTERLINE OF SAID RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE, NORTH 74°52'15" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 2659.03 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING SAID CENTERLINE, AND ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL OF LAND EXTENDED NORTHERLY, SOUTH 00°33'29" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1830.31 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY, EASTERLY, AND SOUTHERLY LINES OF SAID PARCEL OF LAND THE FOLLOWING NINE (9) COURSES: 1) NORTH 89°25'20" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 672.89 FEET; 2) THENCE SOUTH 00°21'26" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 794.32 FEET; 3) THENCE SOUTH 89°04'12" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 299.72 FEET; 4) THENCE SOUTH 89°49'42" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 82.79 FEET; 5) THENCE SOUTH 00°02'56" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 510.70 FEET; 6) THENCE NORTH 89°56'25" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 100.85 FEET; 14 I7210969.4 7) THENCE SOUTH 55°20'11" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 472 42 FEET, 8) THENCE SOUTH 00°06'42" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 44 79 FEET, 9) THENCE SOUTH 37°08'42" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 201 09 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 12, RATERINK SUBDIVISION AS DESCRIBED IN THE RECORDS OF WELD COUNTY ON MAY 9, 1986, AT RECEPTION NO 02053088, THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 12, NORTH 82°18'46" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 395 39 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 7, RATERINK SUBDIVISION REPLAT "A" AS DESCRIBED IN THE RECORDS OF WELD COUNTY ON DECEMBER 21, 1994, AT RECEPTION NO 2419753, THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINES OF SAID RATERINK SUBDIVISION REPLAT "A", THE FOLLOWING FIVE (5) COURSES 1) NORTH 58°34'53" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 428 86 FEET, 2) THENCE NORTH 48°02'02" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1095 95 FEET, 3) THENCE NORTH 44°53'35" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1083 15 FEET, 4) THENCE NORTH 23°34'29" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 367 48 FEET, 5) THENCE SOUTH 89°35'07" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 49 98 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 25 FRONTAGE ROAD, THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) COURSES 1) NORTH 00°36'06" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 28 94 FEET, 2) THENCE NORTH 02°30'49" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 283 89 FEET, 3) THENCE NORTH 02°32'49" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 249 73 FEET, THENCE DEPARTING SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, SOUTH 87°03'11" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 27 60 FEET THENCE 1042 97 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON -TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1449 96 FEET, AN INCLUDED ANGLE OF 41°12'48", AND SUBTENDED BY A CHORD BEARING SOUTH 22°57'13" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1020 63 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 40°04'02" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 317 06 FEET, THENCE 363 13 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON -TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1250 00 FEET, AN INCLUDED ANGLE OF 16°38'41", AND SUBTENDED BY A CHORD BEARING SOUTH 29°34'07" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 361 85 FEET, THENCE NORTH 64°55'25" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1161 97 FEET, THENCE NORTH 25°05'38" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1672 43 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 74°52'15" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1183 55 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING SAID DESCRIBED PARCEL CONTAINING 4,822,771 SQ FT , OR 110 72 ACRES, MORE OR LESS 15 17210969 4 i Exhibit C Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck Depiction of Existing Property Lines for Property "I'5141011: dalle , e. de ..a.. r • - • .C in I OliEW Int'arartitteieW as'avi I a! 3 17210969.4 TO: THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF MEAD, COLORADO. RE: PETITION FOR ANNEXATION DATE: September 13, 2018 The undersigned landowner ("Petitioner"), in accordance with it's the Municipal Annexation Act of 1965 as set forth in Article 12, Title31, Colorado Revised Statutes ("Act"), as amended and as in effect on the submission date set forth below, hereby petitions the Board of Trustees of the Town of Mead for annexation to the Town of Mead ("Town") of the following unincorporated territory located in the County of Weld and State of Colorado, the property being more particularly described by its legal description in "Exhibit A," which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference ("Property"). In support of this petition for annexation ("Petition"), Petitioner further alleges to the Board of Trustees of the Town that: 1. It is desirable and necessary that the territory described above be annexed to the Town. 2. The requirements of C.R.S. §§ 31-12-104 and 31-12-105, as amended, exist or have been met in that: a) Not less than one -sixth of the perimeter of the area proposed to be annexed is contiguous with the Town or will be contiguous with the Town within such time as required by C.R.S. § 31-12-104. b) A community of interest exists between the area proposed to be annexed and the Town. c) The area proposed to be annexed is urban or will be urbanized in the near future. d) The area proposed to be annexed is integrated with or is capable of being integrated with the Town. e) No land within the boundary of the territory proposed to be annexed which is held in identical ownership, whether consisting of one tract or parcel of real estate or two or more contiguous tracts or parcels of real estate, has been divided into separate parts or parcels without the written consent of the landowner or landowners thereof, unless such tracts or parcels were separated by a dedicated street, road or other public way. f) No land within the boundary of the area proposed to be annexed which is held in identical ownership, comprises twenty (20) acres or more, and which, together with the buildings and improvements situated thereon has an assessed value in excess of two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000.00) for ad valorem tax purposes for the year next preceding the annexation, has been included within the area proposed to be annexed without the written consent of the landowner or landowners. 17138148.3 g) The Property is not presently a part of any incorporated city, city and county, or town; nor have any proceedings been commenced for incorporation or annexation in an area that is part or all of the Property; nor has any election for annexation of the Property or substantially the same territory to the Town been held within the twelve (12) months immediately preceding the filing of this Petition. h) The annexation of the territory proposed to be annexed will not result in the detachment of area from any school district or attachment of same to another school district. j) Except to the extent necessary to avoid dividing parcels within the Property held in identical ownership, at least fifty percent (50%) of which are within the three-mile limit, the proposed annexation will not extend the municipal boundary of the Town more than three (3) miles in any direction from any point of the current municipal boundary in any one year. Prior to completion of the annexation of the territory proposed to be annexed, the Town will have in place a plan for that area, which generally describes the proposed: Location, character, and extent of streets, subways, bridges, waterways, waterfronts, parkways, playgrounds, squares, parks, aviation fields, other public ways, grounds, open spaces, public utilities, and terminals for water, light, sanitation, transportation, and power to be provided by the Town; and the proposed land uses for the area; such plan to be updated at least once annually. k) In establishing the boundary of the territory proposed to be annexed, if a portion of a platted street or alley is to be annexed, the entire width of the street or alley has been included within the territory to be annexed. I) The Town will not deny reasonable access to any landowners, owners of any easement, or the owners of any franchise adjoining any platted street or alley which is to be annexed to the Town but is not bounded on both sides by the Town. 3. Petitioner comprises more than fifty percent (50%) of the landowners in the Property owning more than fifty percent (50%) of the Property, excluding public streets, alleys and any land owned by the annexing municipality, and the Petitioner hereby consents to the establishment of the boundaries of the Property as shown in the annexation maps submitted herewith. The legal description of the land owned by the Petitioner is set forth in "Exhibit A," attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 4. Accompanying this Petition are four (4) copies of an annexation map containing the following information: a) A written legal description of the boundaries of the area proposed to be annexed; 17138148.3 b) A map showing the boundary or the area proposed to be annexed, said map prepared and containing the seal of a registered engineer; 2 c) Within the annexation boundary map, a showing of the location of each ownership tract in unplatted land and, if part or all of the area is platted, the boundaries and the plat numbers of plots or of lots and blocks; d) Next to the boundary of the area proposed to be annexed, a drawing of the contiguous boundary of the Town and the contiguous boundary of any other municipality abutting the area proposed to be annexed, and a showing of the dimensions of such contiguous boundaries. 5. The affidavit of the circulator of this Petition certifying that the signature on this Petition is the signature of each person whose name it purports to be certifying the accuracy of the date of such signatures is attached hereto as "Exhibit B" and is incorporated herein by this reference. 6. The proposed annexation of the Property complies with § 30(1)(b) of Article II of the Colorado Constitution. 7. Upon the annexation ordinance becoming effective, the Property proposed to be annexed will become subject to all ordinances, rules and regulations of the Town, except for general property taxes of the Town which shall become effective as the January 1 next ensuing following the adoption of the annexation ordinance. 8. This Petition is conditioned upon the approval of Light Industrial zoning classification for the portion area proposed to be annexed described on "Exhibit C", the approval of Highway Commercial zoning classification for the portion area proposed to be annexed described on "Exhibit D", and approval by the Petitioner of separate annexation agreements for the properties described on Exhibits C and D that are acceptable to the Petitioner and the Town. WHEREFORE, the following Petitioner respectfully requests that the Town, acting through its Board of Trustees, approve the annexation of the Property pursuant to the provisions of the Act. [Signature Page to Follow] 17138148.3 3 Respectfully submitted this I; day of September, 2018. By this acknowledgment, the undersigned hereby certify that the above information is complete and true. OWNER: Name of Owner: WCR 34 & HWY 25-220, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company By: RMG Real Estate Services XV, L.L.C., An Arizona limited liability company, its Administrator By: Title: Date of Signature: Mailing Address: 8800 N. Gainey Center Drive, Suite 255 Scottsdale, Arizona 85258 Resident of the Property: No STATE OF ARIZONA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF MARICOPA ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me thisi,31tay of -f .)pev , 2018, by f tu0 s}U.G N. Gvvr►cz- My commission expires: Ati,9. J'4 ;' aVYA Witness My hand and official seal. t••••— ••—..—..— . .. OFFICIAL SEAL BENJAMIN JAMES McRAE Notary Public - State of Arizona MARICOPA COUNTY My Comm Expires Aug. 14, 2021 17138148.3 otary Public EXHIBIT A Legal Description of Property to be Annexed TWO PARCELS OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN THE RECORDS OF WELD COUNTY ON JUNE 15, 2006, AT :RECEPTION NO. 3396398, LOCATED IN SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY CF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO, BEING MORE PART1CULA.RLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS CONSIDERING THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION '1 TO BEAR NJO'36'06"W, A DISTANCE CF 2638.70 FEET BETWEEN A FOUND 7/8' REBAR WITH 2" ALUMINUM) CAP "2002 LS 23425 T3N R68W SW S11" AT THE WEST ?/4 CORNER OF SECTION 11 AND A FOUND 3 1/4" ALUMINUM CAP PARTIALLY LEGIBLE "FREESE ENGR 1996 LS 4302" AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER CF SECTION 1', W1TH ALL BEARINGS CONTAINED HEREIN RELATIVE THERETO, COMMENCING AT THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION II; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 11 NORTH 00'33'06" WEST, 567.76 FEET TO A POINT ON THE THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE CF THE GREAT WESTERN RAILWAY; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, NORTH 74'52'15' EASE A DISTANCE OF 9109 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER CF SAID PARCEL OF LAND CESCRIUED AT RECEPTION NO. 3396398, AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, NORTH 74'52'15" EAST. A DISTANCE OF 2646.50 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AND ALONG THE EASTERLY, NORTHERLY AND SOUTHERLY LINES OF SAID PARCEL -OF LAND THE FOLLOWING TEN (1G) COJRSES- i) SOUTH D0'33'20" EAST, A DISTANCE GF 1'88_:16 FEET 2) THENCE NORTH 89'25'20T EAST, .A DISTANCE OF 672.89 FEET; ,-5 SOUTH 00'21'26" EAST. A DISTANCE OF 794.32 FEET; 4./ THENCE SOUTH 89'04'12" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 299.72 FEET; 5) THENCE SOUTH 89'41'42" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 82.76 FEET; 8' THENCE SOUTH O0'02 5$" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 510.70 FEET; 7 THENCE NORTH 89'56'25" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 100.85 FEET; 8 THENCE SOUTH `=5'20'11' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 472,42 FEET; 9, THENCE SOUTH 00'06'42" EAST, A. DISTANCE OF 44.7, FEET; 10) THENCE SGJTH 3T08'4/' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 2.1,0'9 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE GEORGE RATERINK ANNEXATION AS DESCRIBED IN THE RECORDS OF WELD COUNTY ON SEPTEMBER 4, 1985, AT RECEPTION NO.G20235`0, SAO NORTHERLY LINE ALSO BEING THE NORTHERLY UNC OF LOT 12, RATER -INK SUBDIVISION AS DESCRIBED IN THE RECORDS OF WELD ..DI IN -1Y UN MAY 9, 1085, Ar ECEPTICN NO. 02053088. THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINES OF SAID GEORGE RATERINK ANNEXATION AND R.ATERINK SUBDIVISION; AND ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINES OF RATERINK SUBDIVISION REPLAT 'A" AS DESCRIBED !N THE RECORDS CF WELD COJNTY ON JECEMUER 21. 1994. THE FOLLOWING SIX (6) COURSES: 1) NORTH 82'118'46 WEST, A DISTANCE OF 305.30 FEET 2 THENCE NORTH 58'34'5.3" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 428.88 FEET; 3 THENCE NORTH 48'02'02" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1035.95 FEET: 4, THENCE NORTH 44'53'35" WEST, A. DISTANCE OF 1083.15 FEET; 5) THENCE NORTH 23'34'29' WEST, A DISTANCE CF 367.48 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89'35'07° WEST, A DISTANCE OF 49.98 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE VALERIE() SCHAZ ANNEXATION TO THE TOWN OF MEAD AS DESCRIBED IN THE RECORDS OF WELD COUNTY ON APRIL 5, 1088, AT RECEPTION NO. 02136726; 17138148.3 EXHIBIT B Affidavit of Circulator STATE OF ARIZONA COUNTY OF MARICOPA r.av� M. ) ss. ) , being first duly sworn upon oath, deposes and says that he was the circula r of this Petition for Annexation of lands to the Town of Mead, Colorado, consisting of ei{- ($ ) pages including this page and that each signature hereon was witnessed by your affiant and is the signature of the person whose name it purports to be. CIRCULATO By: Name: STATE OF ARIZONA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF MARICOPA The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this /lay of , 2018, by 4Jv a -r' My commission expires: "TJ. l h .0396:W Witness My hand and official seal. e • .•^• ••�..�••_ •_OFFICIAL s BENJAMIN JAMES McRAE p' Notary Public - State of Arizona G MARICOPA COUNTY My Comm. Expires Aug. 14 20211 17138148.3 Notary Public V EXHIBIT C Property to be Zoned Light Industrial 17138148.3 THAT PORTION OF A PARCEL OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN THE RECORDS OF WELD COUNTY ON JUNE 15, 2006, AT RECEPTION NO. 3396398, LOCATED IN THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: CONSIDERING THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 11 TO BEAR N00°36'06"W, A DISTANCE OF 2638.70 FEET BETWEEN A FOUND 7/8" REBAR WITH 2" ALUMINUM CAP "2002 LS 29425 T3N R68W S10 S11" AT THE WEST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 11 AND A FOUND 3 1/4" ALUMINUM CAP PARTIALLY LEGIBLE "FREESE ENGR 1996 LS 4392" AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 11, WITH ALL BEARINGS CONTAINED HEREIN RELATIVE THERETO. COMMENCING AT THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 11; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 11 NORTH 00°36'06" WEST, 587.76 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE GREAT WESTERN RAILWAY; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, NORTH 74°52'15" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 93.09 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED AT RECEPTION NO. 3396398, AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, NORTH 74°52'15" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1183.55 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, SOUTH 25°05'38" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1672.43 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 64°55'25" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1161.97 FEET; THENCE 363.13 FEET ALONG THE ARE OF A NON -TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1250.00 FEET, AN INCLUDED ANGLE OF 16°38'41" AND SUBTENDED BY A CHORD BEARING NORTH 29°34'07" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 361.85 FEET; THENCE NORTH 40°04'02" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 317.06 FEET; THENCE 1042.97 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON -TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1449.96 FEET, AN INCLUDED ANGLE OF 41°12'48", AND SUBTENDED BY A CHORD BEARING NORTH 22°57'13" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1020.63 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87°03'11" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 27.60 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF INTERSTATE 25 FRONTAGE ROAD; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, NORTH 02°32'49" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 199.74 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL CONTAINING 2,251,209 SQ.FT. OR 51.68 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. EXHIBIT D Property to be Zoned Highway Commercial 17138148.3 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT WCR 34 AND HWY 25-220, LLC, BEING THE OWNER OF PROPERTY IN WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, EXCLUSIVE OF RIGHTS -OF - WAY, BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A PORTION OF TWO PARCELS OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN THE RECORDS OF WELD COUNTY ON JUNE 15, 2006, AT RECEPTION NO. 3396398, AND A PORTION OF THE GREAT WESTERLY RAILWAY AS DESCRIBED ON MARCH 10, 1906 IN BOOK 234, AT PAGES 92-115 LOCATED IN SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: CONSIDERING THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 11 TO BEAR N00°36'06"W, A DISTANCE OF 2638.70 FEET BETWEEN A FOUND 7/8" REBAR WITH 2" ALUMINUM CAP "2002 LS 29425 T3N R68W S10 S11" AT THE WEST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 11 AND A FOUND 3 1/4" ALUMINUM CAP PARTIALLY LEGIBLE "FREESE ENGR 1996 LS 4392" AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 11, WITH ALL BEARINGS CONTAINED HEREIN RELATIVE THERETO. COMMENCING AT THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 11; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 11 NORTH 00°36'06" WEST, 587.76 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE GREAT WESTERN RAILWAY; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT- OF-WAY LINE, NORTH 74°52'15" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 82.59 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 25 FRONTAGE ROAD, AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE, NORTH 00°36'06" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 41.32 FEET TO A POINT ON THE CENTERLINE OF SAID RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE, NORTH 74°52'15" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 2659.03 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING SAID CENTERLINE, AND ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL OF LAND EXTENDED NORTHERLY, SOUTH 00°33'29" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1830.31 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY, EASTERLY, AND SOUTHERLY LINES OF SAID PARCEL OF LAND THE FOLLOWING NINE (9) COURSES: 1) NORTH 89°25'20" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 672.89 FEET; 2) THENCE SOUTH 00°21'26" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 794.32 FEET; 3) THENCE SOUTH 89°04'12" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 299.72 FEET; 4) THENCE SOUTH 89°49'42" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 82.79 FEET; 5) THENCE SOUTH 00°02'56" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 510.70 FEET; 6) THENCE NORTH 89°56'25" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 100.85 FEET; 7) THENCE SOUTH 55°20'11" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 472.42 FEET; 8) THENCE SOUTH 00°06'42" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 44.79 FEET; 9) THENCE SOUTH 37°08'42" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 201.09 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 12, RATERINK SUBDIVISION AS DESCRIBED IN THE RECORDS OF WELD COUNTY ON MAY 9, 1986, AT RECEPTION NO. 02053088; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 12, NORTH 82°18'46" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 395.39 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 7, RATERINK SUBDIVISION REPLAT "A" AS DESCRIBED IN THE RECORDS OF WELD COUNTY ON DECEMBER 21, 1994, AT RECEPTION NO. 2419753; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINES OF SAID RATERINK SUBDIVISION REPLAT "A", THE FOLLOWING FIVE (5) COURSES: 1) NORTH 58°34'53" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 428.86 FEET; 2) THENCE NORTH 48°02'02" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1095.95 FEET; 3) THENCE NORTH 44°53'35" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1083.15 FEET; 4) THENCE NORTH 23°34'29" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 367.48 FEET; 5) THENCE SOUTH 89°35'07" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 49.98 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 25 FRONTAGE ROAD; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) COURSES: 1) NORTH 00°36'06" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 28.94 FEET; 2) THENCE NORTH 02°30'49" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 283.89 FEET; 3) THENCE NORTH 02°32'49" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 249.73 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, SOUTH 87°03'11" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 27.60 FEET; THENCE 1042.97 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON -TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1449.96 FEET, AN INCLUDED ANGLE OF 41°12'48", AND SUBTENDED BY A CHORD BEARING SOUTH 22°57'13" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1020.63 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 40°04'02" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 317.06 FEET; THENCE 363.13 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON -TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1250.00 FEET, AN INCLUDED ANGLE OF 16°38'41", AND SUBTENDED BY A CHORD BEARING SOUTH 29°34'07" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 361.85 FEET: THENCE NORTH 64°55'25" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1161.97 FEET; THENCE NORTH 25°05'38" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1672.43 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74°52'15" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1183.55 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID DESCRIBED PARCEL CONTAINING 4,822,771 SQ. FT., OR 110.72 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. MEAD MIXED -USE SUBDIVISION ANNEXATION TO THE TOWN OF MEAD, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO A PART OF -'FCTION 11. TOWNSHIP S NORTH. RANG]- GO WEST ELF 1HF 6911 PM., M/ AD, COLORADO c.',INTY OF WFI.U, S.i,lI'E' OL' C/LORADO JI 2 TOTAL ARI:'A 6,962,6/9 "Q NT, 00 /59.95 A: RES, MOO!' OR LESS Surveyor's Certificate Vicinity Map Certificate of Ownership HWY SAG NIIRD. NAN, oh WELT Cr THS ATX If RI Y MOH Of WAR I Nt NM (NI A WINLIYNN 1). SI SAC Y MOO UL WAY I ,NA AND Ai ONIL ANH N._ .r SAO NAVLL,. v. LOWING TEN TI 0) SOUR. 5 ma PHIS IN T.I. R 01 Hit 01.8.. RAO NINX ANNA}, I NA STAMM of LYS.D Y ON MAY 9 Oa, AI /I 0f PION NO Contiguity Information NIV.MS ALLOWABLYCONJ.. (1/6 .oTat HARI 1.956 ,TOT Notre Certificato ,f Ownership :cont) IL 3 ILI) ANON SRO, .� r sfc ie .. _ i,.AV. m., iii ESA., S I., DI, 2, 1.. , bf..OITCH LAS. ' (NW O a . It-SIXTHCORR.. DELI., ivs> CONN.., TO PRESEN SOIRNOARY TOWN OF MEAL), FF. SONTIGUOND S. Bs JOIN H C„ ION Certificate of Approval by the Board of Trustees 'AAA, ONALIO. HI ID ON 20 L AND MOUND.) ON AS HECANNON NU Planning Commission Certificate: oi SHARMAN MANNING COMMISSION SEGNI) IANY Recorder's Certificate:N. MAI WAS OSLO I IA I.COHLT N No DI , a IHE COL,N,..u+k ANC RECORD. Of VOLD LOON. A IT A I, ON THA NAY 2, 2 IN SOON PADA M Of PTO. NC COON Y CIL.< ANIL 20 SOH. 12 NIPS. Developer/Applicant Owner 880T MYER CROSSING BLVD. SUI IE 300 iNDIANAPOLIS 462, 8800 N GAIN. 25 210. DR SO zos DATI DRAM, HY: CHECK, El HY SHEET 1 OF I MEAD MIXED -USE SUBDIVISION ANNEXATION TO THE TOWN OF MEAD, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Lspsnd • IOONQ k!O,,'JI MONOMINj ES ui..0Ni11 it ▪ NLEIFEn L.,Fv Ann.,6 _ n�„MiN..M SAP • CAECJE,EO E05iii. 0,0-r n0,0 OR SET, C; IiAI'FII(SCSI I, 49.95. A PART OF SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH H. M , MEAD, COLORADO C'OEN'L'Y OF WELD, STATE 01' COLORADO N51S E N)152'IS'E - 93.09' POINT Or fallOINNIMO 902•20,9"E 283.99' 80018'0B'W 28.98. ]e>�98'p•W AREA 967.615 0 1'11.1 9, ACHES MORE Es, 858'.31.53' Enk.0.0ir, 00 50008µ1''E sun '20'E 82989' 5890172' 2:91222. 1T2 889.89•8229' 8.09`58•25.21 555R0'11'W >212' Id E 51 F.21 lb EFFIE En/JA/iv,' gill F i. .n MEAD MIXED -USE SUBDIVISION ZONING MAP TO THE TOWN OF MEAD, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Vicinity Map NCI TO SCALE Certificate f Ownership AS DES, MAR. 0 IMD6 DOBK e23,1 say 0,14482 94 JNLH;88,,,,L1,N''JNITAHILTNLOiNONAtO BUN,. MO, I96, '5 439. Al NORIHWEST CORNER OF SELTION • 111 D RE A I, THERETO I, NT, AI ONG biL NORTHERLY L AS 0,3 AND 5, , r n U. bA a AY. (sc 1, IHENCL DOUTH 00..26 EAST A DISTANCE OF 794 3, NIII .3 195 19 II I .0029,0, LA ItI3Ny HEN. NORD, 23 34 29- WEST A DISTANCE OF 36/ 48 Cal 5,I A DISTANCI 01 98 94 1.1 A PART' C!' SECTION II, TOWNStiiP 3 NORTH, RANCE 68 WT,T OF' 7'HF, /H Y.M., MEAD, COLORADO COUN'T'Y UP' WELD, STATE OR COLORADO 9IL I OF 7 Certificate of Ownership (cont) THE NAME A. 5NLE OF MEAD MIXED -3.E ALBD,vi5ION 20Nibb 4,1/ OR 11I RELDIFt0 EXECLBJ _ JAL 0, OF VeGF N 25 270 EN Zone Area A — HC —Highway Commercial P T2062 S 29425 T. SWPT CORNEP 3F SE NC. SOU, 89 31 41 WESI DISIA. 81 WI I %"4 rDTITNC. 14 8N5 EE —HENCE NOR. 32 7:49 8915N E; E AS Zone Area B — LI—Light Industrial THAT PORI, Or A PARCEL OF LA, DESCRIBED Iry THE RECORDS OF WELD COUNTY ;NE IS .06 AT RFC, FON NO 3396398 IODATED IN 1.01: WDST MERIDIAN II AvN, OF WEED STATE OF COLORADO ebn, MORE PAR DESCRIBED A' FOLLOWS COND.., T. WE, LlEr Of 553,WEDI I/4 01 VECTION II O BEAR RNER /<- eF ENGR 1996 ,S 4392 THE CONNER Of SICTION .1 DITH W. BEARING. CONTAINED HEREIN ...Ali, THDRE. THEN, DONTIN,G ALONG PAID SOU,RIY MOH, -OF wr, El, NOR, 74 52•15. LAST, A DISTANT__ OF 083 55 FEET INENCE DEPARI,.0 SAID SOU.EPLY 9 .16, OE WAN INL SOU. 2,05 38 EAST. A DISTANCE OF FEET. DIEN, SOM. 631 95 3, VE8 53 A O5,IAN0L OF 06) 97 FEET EDEN. 393. FFE I AWL, .6 ARE 0, A NON .ANGLNI CUR. TO THC ,EFT, 85, Notes AN r,E NSuRANC, cDMaANr ROMµ TMENI NUMB c .5-880330 HALNI NEAMENDED MORE THAN T, 'BARS I1L .IL OF THE CERTI, T SHOWN H.F. R ▪ ND/ PL▪ ACE AN 3091ION DORNIN 0.3 lik-SECLON CORNER Ok MEANDER 1,63 ON ANL NI 1,8 5.53, . WILEFULLY CUTS DOWN ANY WITNESS TR, OR AN WE 3.3. .0 MA, IL .INE Of A GOVERNMENT CUR.,' UN V.11.0 ACL ,NOLD .69,0939 95, MONJMENT OR RFD. MARK OF ANY 0031,00 SUB., 50A0 31 N. viNUER THIS , IMPRISONED NOT MOPE i 1,11 A iwORN n i b, AND LINT e lb toe l5ry w Frill ry ANN DEIINL, ie. DaF ex s. v seFEN, DEFELF,CAL., No e.. YOGI L_ v 3sos. b a , iCALLN FED, Fna 19 LI8 AUL .0.11) NO I9,931 02 ANO GAIL Certificate of Approval by the Board of Trustees TRUSTEES DE MEAD HgNi.,9:1,VINNNYLLn COW, 0,04.0 , Planning Commlaolon Certiflote: CHAIRMAN Surveyor's Certificate G �E'5 E AND' EAD N 111.0N IS A DOI,LCiDLIINLAT,ON IHF ABOVE DESCRIBED DANCE,. OT LAND NUR.. LERIL DIA, TorIS MAP AND .6. DESCRIPTION FhHE PREPARED UNDER MY PERSON, SUFL. SUN ON IHIS n DAY OF JUNE. DAY b COTTON N DIIAIRMAN Fe CFOBONS INC R.s wA5 ,ILvy FAR RECORD ecorder's Certificate:N LIN OFFICE OF IFI1 OIN Y r LLuu ANO RECORDER o WELD CO3.4 AM. ON THE DA. of UOUN AN., it �c�t �I i. 111�urY Developer/Applicant Owner RIVIR OSSINC BLVD SUITE 300 8800 N GAINEY CLIO,' DR ti, 2.3.5 l'N'ONJANAPOLIN 482. SCOTTS... AY 9,258 r _ JOB NUMBER OW 30 PUNY DRAWN BY PRLSCOF CHFCPPD BY X25/2R/WW/MV SHEE' OF 2 MEAD MIXED -USE SUBDIVISION ZONING MAP TO THE TOWN OF MEAD, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Legend tit .TWIT A,moN„MEN AS AS,S.a55 • oUN. BOWMAN A ITT SGHxIu, N ,Gx,ATEo POSITION �,,(NOT FOB, ON ET, /ON NG NE Boundary Closure Report Exterior: TENGT ,830 31 SOC 21 26 E TLNGTH 794 S2 389 Th _ENG. 82 79 090. 595 39 .23980 SO T Boundary Closure Report Zone Area k S89•49 <2 LENGTH 82 19' LT'L'N'GTOLTS. 'F1974.9 1,60,3. I NOTITT 428 86 NOE 8E LENGTH ESTY 73 STATESS 629.9.6 GItAI'FII(' SCALP: 00 Boundary Closure Report Zone Area B: SCHERSF 0425'0',39„[ LENGTH ]n3. COLASt.NC,T. Soso%5829-w Alms T zoo u0 11100SION T 59680500.1 00 A PART OF SECTION Ll, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, HANCE 60 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., MEAD, COLORADO COUNTY OF WELD, STA? E OF COLORADO 400.38'08.18 31.32' POINT OF FINOINTPTIO 3 1174.322'15"8' 825-8 8i5Y 3.Da tl Nor •0 4 5 263.6-' 10400'3606"W 568'350)"W 83.1,5215,1 22.60' 53)96'02"E L -1032-Y x.'11-.-6' tl11 122'36" 0523SY13"E 1020.-3' SOON AMP • 8,1250.00' x16'36'31" Cx,51-.33.07.E i i / ,....4nc ...ni., \ iia.a nm1s. uoxl ow Lei$ N N \ 8'5J'W 2e 86 50096'1 NAIL- A (;o- Ixi- J P TOF.. x, 9.0120 0.10 9..,1.01. 031 0 Ow at 25,0-E 812 88 5!0104'12" 2-13.32' 3'32"w 238. P / 26'8' 108.65' 555 ,x'11"W mnx,.. 1 vnw xn, O 0,100 [AV I' VJ: 108 NUBBIN 011 30 20111 °HAWN BY CHECKED BT. 21.220/WW/NV SHEET 2 OF 2 ACCOUNT # R0095995 PARCEL # 120711000092 TAX DISTRICT: 2309 WELD COUNTY SCHOOL DIST RED NORTHERN COLORADO WATER INCWI ST VRAN LEFT HAND WATER (SVW) LITTLE THOMPSON WATER (LTW) MOUNTAIN VIEW FIRE HIGH PLAINS LIBRARY LONGMONT CONSERVATION TOTAL 15 80000 56 39400 1 00000 0 15600 0 00000 11 74700 3 25600 0 00000 NET LEVY--> 88.3530000 Real PROPERTY TAX NOTICE 2017 TAXES DUE IN 2018 6 23800 0 00000 0.00000 0.00000 0 00000 0 00000 0 00000 0 00000 FEE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT SIRA/T EXEMPTION Bright Futures TC or PREPAYMENT GRAND TOTAL S B 25 - he absence of State Legislative Funding, your School General Fund mill levy would have been 108 0000000 $367 19 $1.310 59 $23 24 $3 63 $000 $273 00 675 67 $000 $2.053 32 $0 00 $000 $000 $000 $2 053 32 Weld County Treasurer P.O. BOX 458 GREELEY, CO 80632-0458 LAND BUILDINGS/IMPROVE PERSONAL TOTAL SR/VTEXEMPT NET TOTAL $80,123 $0 $0 $80,123 $0 $80,123 $23,240.00 $0.00 $0.00 $23,240.00 $0.00 $23,240.00 MESSAGES FI Making a I'.0ment 02 Delinquent Payments 03 Payment Receipt 'l4&5 Senior or Veteran Exemption See Corresponding e on hack of statement LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Unp:,rd 4rictr c.,, taxi 25524-B PT 11 3 68 BEG W4 COR SEC N0D28'E587.75' TO SLY LN GW RR N75D56'E 93.1' TO TRUE POB N75D56'E 2648.61' TO N -S C/L SEC S0D30'W 1789.3' S89D29'E 672.74' S0D43'W 794.32' N89D49'W 300' N88D58'W 82.76' N51D10'W 2384.41' W1004' TO E LN 1-25 N03D35'E 450' TO FOB WELD SITUS ADDRESS: WELD No Contact Treasurer's Office InunadlaMy If a number appears above. PAYMENT DUE DAT E A TAO FIRST HALF SECOND HALF FULL PAYMENT FEB 28, 2018 JUNE 15, 2018 APRIL 30, 2018 $1,026.66 $1,026.66 $2,053.32 WCR 34 HWY 25-220 LLC 8800 N GAINEY CENTER DR STE 255 SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85258-2164 Make Checks Payable To: Weld County Treasurer POST DATED CHECKS ARE NOT ACCEPTED If you have sold this property, please forward this statement to the new owner or return to this office marked "property sold" Please see reverse side of this form for additional information. -n,nt-t Treasurer a estxx+s,ble for erroneous paymen ,. If ,r, nnura please rnemw,, xfr min your ,xtyage 'rower to wt,t, ,., to make the tax oayrnent Fatlb,,. to ,fo .o co". ,ew,rt ,r rtelayarl tan. ..eL ,ny of you, ao ia,nt RE TAIN TOP PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS 2017 TAXES DUE IN 2018 No Contact Treasurer's Office Immediately if a "Yes" appears above. RETURN THIS COUPON FOR SECOND HALF PAYMENTS 2nd Half Coupon Return M., a rnwo„ ,„rtt, paympot to DO NOT PAY THIS BILL IF cTleDutE -. Weld County Treasurer P O BOX 458 YOUR MORTGAGE COMPANY WILL MAKE THIS PAYMENT. R0095995 IF YOUR ADDRESS IS NOT CORRECT GREELEY, CO 80632-0458 PROPERTY (OWNER OF , RECORD El Check this box for change of address, make changes and sign below. WCR 34 HWY 25-220 LLC 8800 N GAINEY CENTER DR STE 255 SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85258-2164 SECOND HALF DUE BY JUNE 15, 2018 $1,026.66 PAYMENTS MUST BE IN V S. FUNDS County Treasurer ,s not 'es able tor erroneous payments It et ,tube please cherf, wen your ,norlgaye holder to rieterrn,ne yen° rs to mele the lax payment Fa,ture to ,t se could result ,n delayed prn- resse,g of yore aeon.. 2017 TAXES DUE IN 2018 I No Contact Treasurer's Office Immediately If a "Yes" appears above. RETURN THIS COUPON WITH FIRST HALF OR FULL PAYMENTS Full Payment or 1st Half Coupon Rotor, flu, r„,,pure ,„u, nny,r,nnt r,, DO NOT PAY THIS BILL IF,,,-Pit.r.u. t .� 11110101 ID Ill H Ill I 0 It IEll Weld County Treasurer X 458 YOUR MORTGAGE COMPANY WILL MAKE THIS PAYMENT. R0095995 I IF YOtlR AlfRFSS IC Mf1T CORRECT GREELEY, Co 80632-0458 PROPE R T r OWNER or Check this box for change o1 address, make changes and sign below. WCR 34 HWY 25-220 LLC 8800 N GAINEY CENTER DR STE 255 SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85258-2164 PAYMENTS MUST BE IN U.S. FUNDS AND DRAWN ON A U S BANK FIRST HALF PAYMENT DUE BY FEB 28, 2018 $1,026.66 FULL PAYMENT DUE BY APRIL 30, 2018 $2,053.32 ACCOUNT # R0096095 PARCEL # 120711000093 TAX DISTRICT: 2309 Real PROPERTY TAX NOTICE 2017 TAXES DUE IN 2018 Weld County Treasurer P.O. BOX 458 GREELEY, CO 80632-0458 ASST SSFD TAX AUTHORITY TAX LEVY r0'-''0' url rn GENERAL TAX VAL DATIC)N ACTUAL WELD COUNTY SCHOOL DIST RE1J NORTHERN COLORADO WATER (NCWI ST VRAIN LEFT HAND WATER (SVW) LITTLE THOMPSON WATER (LTW) MOUNTAIN VIEW FIRE HIGH PLAINS LIBRARY LONGMONT CONSERVATION TOTAL 15 80000 56 39400 1 00000 0 15000 0.00000 11 74700 3 25600 0 00000 NET LEVY-> 88 3530000 6 23800 0 00000 0 00000 0 00000 0 00000 0 00000 0.00000 0 00000 FEE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT SRA/7- EXEMPTION Bright Futures TC or PREPAYMENT GRAND TOTAL S 8 25 - in absence of State Legislative Funding, your School General Fund moll levy would have been 108.6000000 $411 59 $1,469 07 $26 05 $4 06 $000 $306 01 $84 82 $000 $2 301 G0 $0 00 $000 $000 $0 00 52 301 60 LAND BUILDINGS/IMPROVE PERSONAL TOTAL SRNT EXEMPT NET TOTAL $89,799 $0 $0 $89,799 $0 $89,799 $26,050.00 $0.00 $0.00 $26,050.00 $0.00 $26,050.00 MESSAGES I llakinga Pub ment 0_2 Delinquent Payments s3 Payment Receipt a4&5 Senior or Velo'an Exemption See Corresponding d on back of statement LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Ut,p:1,(1 )n,,, ,,,r cra,•,. 25521-B PT 11 3 68 BEG W4 COR SEC N0D28'E 587.75' TO SLY LN GW RR N75D56'E 93.1' TO ELY LN 1-25 S03D35'W 450' TO TRUE POB E1004' S51 D10'E 2384.41' SOD52'W 510.57' TO N LN SUB EXEMPT SE -278 S89D33'W 100.71' S56D42'W 472.45' S0D53'W 44.7' S36D08'E 200.7' TO NLY LN RATERINK SUB Additional Legal Desc. On File With Assessor SITUS ADDRESS: WELD WCR 34 HWY 25-220 LLC 8800 N GAINEY CENTER DR STE 255 SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85258-2164 No Contact Treasurer's Office knm.diaisy If a number appears above. PAYMENT DUE DATE AM OuNr FIRST HALF SECOND HALF FULL PAYMENT FEB 28, 2018 JUNE 15, 2018 APRIL 30, 2018 $1,150.80 $1,150.80 $2,301.60 Make Checks Payable To: Weld County Treasurer POST DATED CHECKS ARE NOT ACCEPTED If you have sold this property, please forward this statement to the new owner or return to this office marked 'properly sold" Please see reverse side of this form for additional mformation. ...Iowa,. Treasurers not ,es{arsrble Tor a.roots.,e ,ayments ,t in on,mt please r haw *oh yOor mortgage noele, to Icrennn,e wQo is to moos rho taw garment F allure to do st .,ro k, 'ester ,n /Weyer) pro ry rnrt of vow account RETAIN TOP PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS 2017 TAXES DUE IN 2018 cz Unpaid prior year lass No Contact Treasurer's Office Immediately if a "Yes" appears above. RETURN THIS COUPON FOR SECOND HALF PAYMENTS 2nd Half Coupon 2 Retort, th,. cpupon with payment to DO NOT PAY THIS BILL IF scneouLE Weld County Treasurer P.O BOX 458 YOUR MORTGAGE COMPANY WILL MAKE THIS PAYMENT. R0096095 nl iC vnnn anaFSc is Yaafa nT rnarT GREELEY. CO 80632-0458 PROPERTY OWNER OF , RECORD Check this box for change of address. make changes and sign below. WCR 34 HWY 25-220 LLC 8800 N GAINEY CENTER DR STE 255 SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85258-2164 SECOND HALF DUE BY JUNE 15, 2018 $1,150.80 PAYMENTS MUST BE IN U S FUNDS Cawnty Treasurer ,s ,vH responsible for eourteous payments it ,n ctoote please chert, wen your ',.'gage holder to .1Weorene woo a to ,nu a the taw payment Failure to do so awed 'cam m delayed pro. cess,ng of your a sstot 2017 TAXES DUE IN 2018 7---atglmamNo izms-- Contact Treasurer's Office Immediately K a "Yes" appears above. RETURN THIS COUPON WITH FIRST HALF OR FULL PAYMENTS Full Payment or 1st Half Coupon 1 MINTON Ill i M Ill IND' Ill Rot,,,,, III, r_ntrpr,n With payment IF,Weld County Teasurer 458 DO NMORTGAE OT PAY THIS BILL IF SCHEnVlf 4m WILL MAKE THGS PAYMENIT, R0096095 vnnn annoccc is unT rnoocrT GR ELOE 4COr80632 O458 PROPFRT� )WNE.R r)F FI11-ORL t Li Cheek this box for change of address, make changes and sign below. WCR 34 HWY 25-220 LLC 8800 N GAINEY CENTER DR STE 255 SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85258-2164 PAY ME NT ti MUST BF IN U.S. FUNDS AND DRAWN ON A U S BANK FIRST HALF PAYMENT DUE BY FEB 28, 2018 $1,150 80 FULL PAYMENT DUE BY APRIL 30. 2018 $2,301.60 SENT VIA FEDEX September 13, 2018 Board of County Commissioners Weld County 1150 O Street P O Box 758 Greeley, CO 80631 Re: Annexation Impact Report for the Mead Mixed -Used Subdivision Annexation Board of County Commissioners In accordance with the requirements of the Municipal Annexation Act of 1965, as amended, and specifically C R S Section 31-12-108 5, Town Staff prepared and completed the below annexation impact report ("AIR") for the Mead Mixed -Use Subdivision Annexation (the " Subject Property") on September , 2018 In total, the Subject Property includes approximately 159 95 acres and is described on Attachment A to this AIR The Subject Property is also described with particularity in the Annexation Map, a copy of which is enclosed for your reference A vicinity map is included with the Annexation map The AIR is being provided to you in accordance with the timeframe established in C R S Section 31-12-108 5(1) In accordance with § 31-12-108 5, C R S , the following information is submitted to the Board of County Commissioners (a) A copy of the annexation maps (for the Mead Mixed -Use Subdivision Annexation) identifying the Subject Property and the adjacent territory and the present boundaries of the Town of Mead in the vicinity of the Subject Property is enclosed herewith (together, the "Annexation Map"), and is made a part of this AIR (I) The Annexation Map shows the boundaries (present and proposed) of the Town of Mead in the vicinity of the proposed annexation (II) The Annexation Map shows the present streets in the vicinity of the proposed annexation There are no proposed plans by the Town of Mead to extend streets within the Subject Property, but dedication of future County Road 9 5 right-of- way is being proposed 17376264 4 The Town does not currently provide water, sanitary sewer, gas, or other utility service to the Subject Property. These utility services are currently provided by other service providers, including St. Vrain Sanitation District, Northern Colorado Water, Little Thompson Water District, Mountain View Fire District, and other existing special districts (each, a "Service Provider"). The Subject Property will be served by the Town's sanitation and sewer system, and the developer will extend all utility lines to the Subject Property for water, sewer, gas, electric, and other services. As the Town does not currently provide water, sanitary sewer, gas, or electric power to the Subject Property, the exact location of major trunk water mains, sewer interceptors and outfalls, and other utility lines and ditches, is not available to the Town. A map showing the estimated locations of utilities serving the Subject Property is set forth in the maps below, in accordance with C.R.S. Section 31-12-108.5(1)(a)(II). UTILITY MAPS SCR u� Ell• Gee* DO ttilli•••' • l eon • s in= ....enlYaisit i 1 ._r We* 011106- MEI? • a • • a 1j ' • L....: i • S r LAKE THOMAS WWTF F w t I 1 .. . brines Se 411 ri t.kc:Lvu Road Ctrnter,re Par c Oa Mead 'awn Ltr!S -en.—Mood Seater L rre ST VRAIN �NWTF 2 17376264.4 Farms Isla Yraw NLT Pt.ct Cleo* Lift Station ea, i \\MID1 a i 1 sass... r� • • LEGEND Road Centerline Parcels C! Mood Town Ins c&Atildl'Ilson Pipe Diameter MOMS Ur a. 24 21` '8. a 15' maw 12' a 100 - r - <c6 ea Sanitary Fortes Man ., 3 17376264.4 LITTLE THOMPSON WATER DISTRICT WATERLINES IN THE TOWN OF MEADS URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY 4 17376264.4 ST. VRAIN SANITATION DISTRICT Ile II ....._.... • (III) The entire Subject Property is currently vacant. The existing land use pattern in the area is agricultural and retail/industrial development (a U -Haul facility and RV body and paint shop). As of the date of this AIR, it is anticipated that the initial zoning of the Subject Property will include Light Industrial and Highway Commercial zoning and that the land use pattern will consist of uses permitted under such zone districts pursuant to the Town's Municipal Code ("Code"), including light industrial, office, retail, and related uses. The map below highlights the existing and proposed land use pattern for the Subject Property, in accordance with C.R.S. Section 31-12- 108.5 ( 1)(a)(III). 5 17376264.4 TOWN'S EXISTING LAND USE PATTERN TOWN'S PROPOSED ZONING MAP Please see Attachment B. (b) There is no draft or final pre -annexation agreement relating to the Subject Property. 6 17376264.4 (c) Following the effective date of the annexation of the Subject Property, the Town will continue to provide public works service to the public streets that are adjacent to, and which provide access to, the Subject Property. In addition, the Town will provide other municipal services to the Subject Property, including municipal law enforcement, code enforcement, and other municipal services the Town currently provides to other properties in the Town (collectively, "Town Services"). The Subject Property will remain in the Mountain View Fire District and the Weld County School District REIJ. (d) The developer of the Subject Property will be required to extend all water, sewer, gas, electric, and other utility lines to the Subject Property at its own cost. (e) Portions of the Subject Property are currently within the boundaries of the following districts: Mountain View Fire District; St. Vrain Sanitation District; Little Thompson Water District; Weld County School District REIJ; High Plains Library District; and Northern Colorado Water. (f) The Subject Property is anticipated to develop in accordance with the two proposed initial zone districts identified above. The Light Industrial zone district permits only large group living facility -type residential development upon approval of a conditional use permit, and the Highway Commercial district permits limited residential development also upon approval of a conditional use permit. The annexation of the Subject Property is anticipated to have a minor effect on the local public school district system, if any. The Town anticipates minor or no additional capital construction by the school district will be required to service the Subject Property. At such time as the owner(s) of parcels within the Subject Property propose a development that contains residential dwelling units, the Town will verify and require the dedication of land for school purposes, or fees -in -lieu of land, on behalf of the school district, in accordance with the Code. This concludes the AIR for the Subject Property. Please contact me for any follow-up information you may need at ckennedy@townofmead.org or 970-805-4192. Sincerely, Christopher Kennedy Planning Director cc: [LIST ANY] Enclosures: Annexation Map (Mead Mixed -Use Subdivision Annexation) 7 17376264.4 ATTACHMENT A (Description of Subject Property — Mead Mixed -Use Subdivision Annexation) (AREA TO BE ANNEXED TO TOWN OF MEAD) TWO PARCELS OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN THE RECORDS OF WELD COUNTY ON ,UNE 15, 2006, AT RECEPTION NO. 3396398, LOCATED IN SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: CONSIDERING THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 11 TO BEAR NO0'36'06"W, A DISTANCE OF 2638.70 FEET BETWEEN A FOUND 7/8" REBAR WITH 2" ALUMINUM CAP "2002 LS 29425 T3N R68W S10 S11" AT THE WEST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 11 AND A FOUND 3 1/4" ALUMINUM CAP PARTIALLY LEGIBLE "FREESE ENGR 1996 LS 4392" AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 11, WITH ALL BEARINGS CONTAINED HEREIN RELATIVE THERETO. COMMENCING AT THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 11; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 11 NORTH 00'36'06" WEST, 587.76 FEET TO A POINT ON THE THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE GREAT WESTERN RAILWAY; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, NORTH 74'52'15" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 93.09 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED AT RECEPTION NO. 3396398, AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, NORTH 74'52'15" EAST. A DISTANCE OF 2648.50 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AND ALONG THE EASTERLY. NORTHERLY AND SOUTHERLY LINES OF SAID PARCEL OF LAND THE FOLLOWING TEN (10) COURSES: 1) SOUTH 00'33'29" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1788.98 FEET; 2) THENCE NORTH 89'25'20" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 672.89 FEET; 3) THENCE SOUTH 00'21'26" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 794.32 FEET; 4 THENCE SOUTH 89'04'12" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 299.72 FEET; 5 THENCE SOUTH 89'49'42" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 82.79 FEET; 6 THENCE SOUTH 00'02'56" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 510.70 FEET; 7 THENCE NORTH 89'56'25" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 100.85 FEET; 8) THENCE SOUTH 55'20'11" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 472.42 FEET; 9) THENCE SOUTH 00'06'42" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 44.79 FEET; 10) THENCE SOUTH 37'08'42" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 201.09 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE GEORGE RATERINK ANNEXATION AS DESCRIBED IN THE RECORDS OF WELD COUNTY ON SEPTEMBER 4, 1985, AT RECEPTION NO.02023519, SAID NORTHERLY LINE ALSO BEING THE NORTHERLY UNE OF LOT 12, RATERINK SUBDIVISION AS DESCRIBED IN THE RECORDS OF WELD COUNTY ON MAY 9, 1986, AT RECEPTION NO. 02053088. THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINES OF SAID GEORGE RATERINK ANNEXATION AND RATERINK SUBDIVISION. AND ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINES OF RAIERRINK SUBDIVISION REPLAT "A" AS DESCRIBED IN THE RECORDS OF WELD COUNTY ON DECEMBER 21, 1994. THE FOLLOWING SIX (6) COURSES: 1) NORTH 82'18'46" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 395.39 FEET 2) THENCE NORTH 58'34'53' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 428.86 FEET; 3) THENCE NORTH 48'02'02' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1095.95 FEET; 4) THENCE NORTH 44'53'35" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1083.15 FEET; 5) THENCE NORTH 23'34'29' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 367.48 FEET; 6) THENCE SOUTH 89'35'07" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 49.98 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE WILFRIED SCHULZ ANNEXATION TO THE TOWN OF MEAD AS DESCRIBED IN THE RECORDS OF WELD COUNTY ON APRIL 5, 1988, AT RECEPTION NO. 02136726; 17376264.4 ATTACHMENT B (Proposed Zoning Map — Mead Mixed -Use Subdivision Annexation) [see attached] 17376264.4 Town of Mead LUA # AN. 970-535-4477 www.townofinead.org 441 Third Street P.O. Box 626 Mead, CO 80542 ANNEXATION PRE -APPLICATION FORM Date of Pre -application meeting Project Name Applicant Contact: July 19, 2018 Mead Mixed -Use Subdivision Chris Miller, Dan Skeehan Contact Information: Chrism(c4scannellproperties.com; Dan. Skeehan(rikimley-horn.corn Project Location Generall northwest of I-25/CR 34 intersection Project Description Annexation of approximately 160 acres, with the purpose of locating a trucking terminal facility Fee: $2,500 Deposit: $5,000 Total: $7,500 Please provide the following with this checklist. For additional information, refer to Chapter 16, Article VIII of the Mead Town Code. X X X 1. Six (6) paper copies of the complete annexation application package. 2. All maps, legal descriptions and surrounding property owner information on 5 USB Drives (or CD-ROM). 3. Land Use Application Form, including certification of ownership or statement of authority. Staff will provide form to applicant. 4. Fee Agreement and Deposit. Staff will provide boilerplate agreement to applicant. 5. Surrounding and Interested Property Ownership Report. County Assessor tool shall be used to generate this report. 6. Title Commitment (dated within 30 days of application). 7. Affidavit certifying names and addresses of all mineral and subsurface right owners. 8. Letter of Intent to Annex. 9. Annexation Petition. The applicant shall submit a petition for annexation complying with the requirements of C.R.S. § 31-12-107. The Town's standard petition shall be utilized. Petition shall contain the statements outlined in Section 16-8-60 of the Code. 10. Annexation Map. Shall be signed and sealed by registered land surveyor or engineer preparing annexation map, or under whose supervision map was prepared. Provide one (I) "Annexation Map Land Surveying Standards Checklist" completed by Surveyor. Applicant Annexation Map shall conform to standards outlined in Section 16-8-80 of the Code. X X X X X 11. Concept Plan Map. Paper copies of the concept plan map(s) shall be blue line or black line copies of the original, folded to 12" x 9" size and shall contain meet the technical standards outlined in Section 16-8-90 of the Code. 12. Property Tax Statement. A copy of the prior year's property tax statement for all property to be annexed. 13. Annexation Assessment and Impact Report. For areas of ten (10) or more acres a report is required that conforms to C.R.S. § 31-12-108.5, assessing impacts of the proposed annexation on the community and existing services and facilities and detailing the need for expansion of those services and facilities to accommodate the development proposed for the property being annexed. The narratives shall be one or more paragraphs in length, and adequate to fully explain the needs, concepts and proposed solutions for each of the issues outlined in Section 16-8-60(b)(8) and (12) of the Code. 14. Consistency with the Town Comprehensive Plan. The applicant is required to provide a narrative response related to the conformance of the project to the goals identified in the Comprehensive Plan. 15. Water Rights. The applicant shall provide a "Water Rights Report" for the property prepared by a qualified water engineer or water attorney detailing the water rights appurtenant to and severed from the property to be annexed and their historical use. The report must include both surface (tributary) and subsurface (non -tributary and not non - tributary groundwater). In addition, the applicant shall provide a signed standard form warranty deed for the transfer of all subsurface (non -tributary) water rights to the Town. 16. Zoning of Property to Be Annexed. The petitioner must submit a completed Zoning Application form, provide a Zoning Map for the property, a zoning amendment map amending the official zoning map and pay the application and recording fees. 17. A draft Annexation Agreement. Staff will provide boilerplate agreement. Applicant Certification I hereby certify that the pre -application meeting occurred (in -person or remotely) on (or around) the indicated date and that Town staff provided information regarding application submittal and the review process. 'e72ei//re Date Planning & Zoning Department Community Development Agency Referral Request Today's Date: Referral Comments Due: Project Name: Project Number: Project Type: Project Address: Planning Contact: Email: Phone: September 26, 2018 October 25, 2018 Mead Warehouse 2018-11 Annexation & Zoning Generally, northwest of I-25/CR 34 intersection Jeremiah Fettig jfettig@townofmead.org (970) 805-4202 Dear Referral Organization or Agency: Information on the proposal in the Town of Mead referenced above is enclosed for your review and comments. Please reply by the date listed above, any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response by the Planning Department. ❑ We have no objections to this proposal ❑ Please note the following concerns this organization has with this proposal: See attached letter for comments regarding this proposal. Organization or Agency Name: Your Name: Date: Email: Please send your response to jfettig@townofinead.org If you have any further questions regarding the application, please contact the Planner associated with the request as referenced above. Town of Mead 1441 Third Street I Mead, Colorado 80542 I (970) 535-4477 I www.townofmead.org Chloe Rempel From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Pam Gehringer <PGehringer@townofmead.org> Wednesday, September 26, 2018 4:04 PM Pam Gehringer Christopher Kennedy; Jeremiah Fettig Mead Warehouse Preliminary Plat 'This email originated from outsideofof Weld County Government. Do not click lin' sender and know the content is safe. REVIEW REFERRAL: PROJECT FILE# 2018-12 FROM: TOWN OF MEAD PLANNING DEPARTMENT attachments-: Information on the proposal referenced below is available for your review and comment. Please see the instructions in this email for accessing information on this proposal. Project Name Mead Warehouse Project Type Preliminary Plat Project Location Generally northwest of I-25/CR 34 intersection Zoning Mixed Use Comments Due By October 25, 2018 Planning Contact Jeremiah Fettig Email jfettig@townofinead.org Phone 970-805-4202 1 For external entities such as utility companies, special districts, property owner's associations or state agencies, please use the following instructions. Documents are available for your review on the Town of Mead Dropbox folder. Please use the following information to access the site: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/n6d18hfucdpol7t/AABtBsem3HoJ7o- N4mH9zTcsa?d1=0 To provide comments, please complete referral form located in the dropbox and email to Jeremiah Fettig ifettig@townofinead.org Pam Gehringer Town of Mead Utility Billing Building Permits 2 Town of Mead 441 Third Street P.O. Box 626 970-535-4477 Mead, CO 80542 11vtR.t0t1110t111ead.ure LAND USE APPLICATION PAGE TWO MUST BE SIGNED AND NOTARIZED Project/Business Name Mead Mixed -Use Subdivision Project Address Northeast corner of 1-25 Frontage Road and County Road 34. Project Description 159.95 acre subdivision. Reconfiguration of two existing un-subdivided lots into four lots, plus right-of-way and easement dedications. Separate Annexation, Initial Zoning, and Administrative Site Plan (for 50.08 acres) applications submitted. Legal Description (Provide Subdivision. Lot #, Block / or Attach Metes and Bounds) Mead Mixed -Use Subdivision, Lots 1-4, Block 1 Owner Name/Company (Attach Separate Sheets if Multiple) Contact Person (if Different) Augustine Gomez WCR 34 & Hwy 25-220 LLC: do McRae Group of Companies Address/City/State/Zip 8800 N. Gainey Center Drive, Suite 255, Scottsdale, AZ 85285 Phone (480) 609-1200 Email Auggie@ronMcRae.com Fax (480) 609-1200 Authorized Representative Name/Company Scannell Properties, LLC. Attn: Chris Miller Address/City/State/Zip 8801 River Crossing Blvd, Suite 300, Indianapolis, IN 46240 Phone (317) 843-5959 Email ChrisM@ScannellProperties.com Fax Land Use Application Form 08/09 Page 1 of 2 Mineral Rights Owner/Lease Holder Name/Company (Attach Separate Sheets if Multiple) Grizzly Petroleum Company, LLC Address/City/State/Zip 1801 Broadway, Suite 500, Denver CO 80202 Service Providers Gas Xcel Electric United Power Water Little Thompson Water District Metro District Sewer Town of Mead Fire Mountain View Fire District Land Use Information Current Zoning A - Agricultural (Weld County) Proposed Zoning LI & HC Acres 159.95 # Lots/Units Proposed 4 Density (DU/Acre) N/A The undersigned is fully aware of the request/proposal being made and the actions being initiated on the referenced property. The undersigned understand that the application must be found to be complete by the Town of Mead before the request can officially be accepted and the development review process initiated. The undersigned is aware that the applicant is fully responsible for all reasonable costs associated with the review of the application/request being made to the Town of Mead. Applicants shall pay all costs billed by the Town for legal, engineering and planning costs incurred by staff, including consultants acting on behalf of staff necessary for project review. By this acknowledgement, the undersigned hereby certify that the above information is true and correct. WCR 34 & HWY 25-220. LLC. a Colorado limited liability company By: RMG Real Estate S prices XV. L.L.C.; an Arizona limited liability company, its Administrator Owner: — gy, ��--1J� j�/� . its Authorized Officer Owner: Applicant: STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of nciree ) QDate: 942//,3 Date: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this JAM day of „ ,. , 201. by Atu0CG61"n•.,►z-t!?- My commission expires: Aug Pi ' o Witness my hand and official s1.OFFICIAL SEAL !""^•• — — — — —•• to BENJAMIN JAMES McRAE Notary Public - State of Arizona MARICOPA COUNTY Land Use Application Form 08/09 Notary Public Ott�J ttv r'NTm Fvrlr eA, 4 /XYl41 Page 2 of 2 MEAD MIXED -USE SUBDIVISION, LOT 1 THAT PORTION OF A PARCEL OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN THE RECORDS OF WELD COUNTY ON JUNE 15, 2006, AT RECEPTION NO. 3396398, LOCATED IN THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: CONSIDERING THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 11 TO BEAR N00°36'06"W, A DISTANCE OF 2638.70 FEET BETWEEN A FOUND 7/8" REBAR WITH 2" ALUMINUM CAP "2002 LS 29425 T3N R68W S10 S11" AT THE WEST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 11 AND A FOUND 3 1/4" ALUMINUM CAP PARTIALLY LEGIBLE "FREESE ENGR 1996 LS 4392" AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 11, WITH ALL BEARINGS CONTAINED HEREIN RELATIVE THERETO. COMMENCING AT THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 11; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 11 NORTH 00°36'06" WEST, 587.76 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE GREAT WESTERN RAILWAY; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, NORTH 74°52'15" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 93.09 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED AT RECEPTION NO. 3396398, AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, NORTH 74°52'15" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1183.55 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, SOUTH 25°05'38" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1672.43 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 64°55'25" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1161.97 FEET; THENCE 363.13 FEET ALONG THE ARE OF A NON -TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1250.00 FEET, AN INCLUDED ANGLE OF 16°38'41" AND SUBTENDED BY A CHORD BEARING NORTH 29°34'07" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 361.85 FEET; THENCE NORTH 40°04'02" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 317.06 FEET; THENCE 1042.97 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON -TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1449.96 FEET, AN INCLUDED ANGLE OF 41°12'48", AND SUBTENDED BY A CHORD BEARING NORTH 22°57'13" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1020.63 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87°03'11" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 27.60 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF INTERSTATE 25 FRONTAGE ROAD; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, NORTH 02°32'49" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 199.74 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL CONTAINING 2,251,209 SQ.FT. OR 51.68 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. MEAD MIXED -USE SUBDIVISION, LOTS 2-4 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT WCR 34 AND HWY 25-220, LLC, BEING THE OWNER OF PROPERTY IN WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, EXCLUSIVE OF RIGHTS -OF - WAY, BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A PORTION OF TWO PARCELS OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN THE RECORDS OF WELD COUNTY ON JUNE 15, 2006, AT RECEPTION NO. 3396398, AND A PORTION OF THE GREAT WESTERLY RAILWAY AS DESCRIBED ON MARCH 10, 1906 IN BOOK 234, AT PAGES 92-115 LOCATED IN SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: CONSIDERING THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 11 TO BEAR N00° 36'06'W, A DISTANCE OF 2638.70 FEET BETWEEN A FOUND 7/8" REBAR WITH 2" ALUMINUM CAP "2002 LS 29425 T3N R68W S10 S11" AT THE WEST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 11 AND A FOUND 3 1/4" ALUMINUM CAP PARTIALLY LEGIBLE "FREESE ENGR 1996 LS 4392" AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 11, WITH ALL BEARINGS CONTAINED HEREIN RELATIVE THERETO. COMMENCING AT THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 11; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 11 NORTH 00°36'06" WEST, 587.76 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE GREAT WESTERN RAILWAY; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT- OF-WAY LINE, NORTH 74°52'15" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 82.59 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 25 FRONTAGE ROAD, AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE, NORTH 00°36'06" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 41.32 FEET TO A POINT ON THE CENTERLINE OF SAID RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE, NORTH 74°52'15" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 2659.03 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING SAID CENTERLINE, AND ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL OF LAND EXTENDED NORTHERLY, SOUTH 00°33'29" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1830.31 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY, EASTERLY, AND SOUTHERLY LINES OF SAID PARCEL OF LAND THE FOLLOWING NINE (9) COURSES: 1) NORTH 89°25'20" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 672.89 FEET; 2) THENCE SOUTH 00°21'26" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 794.32 FEET; 3) THENCE SOUTH 89°04'12" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 299.72 FEET; 4) THENCE SOUTH 89°49'42" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 82.79 FEET; 5) THENCE SOUTH 00°02'56" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 510.70 FEET; 6) THENCE NORTH 89°56'25" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 100.85 FEET; 7) THENCE SOUTH 55°20'11" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 472.42 FEET; 8) THENCE SOUTH 00°06'42" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 44.79 FEET; 9) THENCE SOUTH 37°08'42" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 201.09 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 12, RATERINK SUBDIVISION AS DESCRIBED IN THE RECORDS OF WELD COUNTY ON MAY 9, 1986, AT RECEPTION NO. 02053088; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 12, NORTH 82°18'46" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 395.39 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 7, RATERINK SUBDIVISION REPLAT "A" AS DESCRIBED IN THE RECORDS OF WELD COUNTY ON DECEMBER 21, 1994, AT RECEPTION NO. 2419753; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINES OF SAID RATERINK SUBDIVISION REPLAT "A", THE FOLLOWING FIVE (5) COURSES: 1) NORTH 58°34'53" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 428.86 FEET; 2) THENCE NORTH 48°02'02" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1095.95 FEET; 3) THENCE NORTH 44°53'35" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1083.15 FEET; 4) THENCE NORTH 23°34'29" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 367.48 FEET; 5) THENCE SOUTH 89°35'07" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 49.98 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 25 FRONTAGE ROAD; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) COURSES: 1) NORTH 00°36'06" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 28.94 FEET; 2) THENCE NORTH 02°30'49" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 283.89 FEET; 3) THENCE NORTH 02°32'49" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 249.73 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, SOUTH 87°03'11" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 27.60 FEET; THENCE 1042.97 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON -TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1449.96 FEET, AN INCLUDED ANGLE OF 41°12'48", AND SUBTENDED BY A CHORD BEARING SOUTH 22°57'13" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1020.63 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 40°04'02" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 317.06 FEET; THENCE 363.13 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON -TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1250.00 FEET, AN INCLUDED ANGLE OF 16°38'41", AND SUBTENDED BY A CHORD BEARING SOUTH 29°34'07" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 361.85 FEET; THENCE NORTH 64°55'25" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1161.97 FEET; THENCE NORTH 25°05'38" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1672.43 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74°52'15" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1183.55 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID DESCRIBED PARCEL CONTAINING 4,822,771 SQ. FT., OR 110.72 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. Town of Mead 441 Third Street PO Box 626 Mead, CO 80542 PRELIMINARY PLAT PRE -APP FORM Date of Pre -application meeting: July 19, 2018 Project Name: Mead Mixed -Use Subdivision Project Location: Generally northwest of I-25/CR 34 intersection Project Description: Annexation of approximately 160 acres, with the purpose of locating a trucking terminal facility. Fee: $750 Deposit: $10,000 Total Due: $10,750 For more information, please refer to the Mead Land Use Code, here: https://library.municode.com/co/mead/codes/municipal_ code?nodeld=CD_CH 16LAUSCO Submittal Checklist X 1. Six paper and five electronic (flash or CD) copies of application package. X 2. Legal descriptions — provided in Word document X 3. Land Use Application Form. https://www.townofinead.org/sites/default/files/fileattachments/planning amp_zonin gipage/51096/land_use application.pdf X 4. Technical criteria form (This document). X 5. Fee Agreement. https://www.townofinead.org/sites/default/files/fileattachments/planning amp_zonin g/page/51096/agreement_for_payment_of review_expenses.pdf X 6. Fee and deposit. https://www.townofinead.org/sites/default/files/fileattachments/ordinance/51085/reso 58-r-2017 fees and deposits under land use code.pdf X 7. Title Commitment. The title commitment must be current and dated no more than thirty (30) days from the date of preliminary plat application submittal. X 8. Surrounding and Interested Property Ownership Report. Provide current list (< 30 days old) of the names and addresses of the surrounding property owners (within 300 feet of property), mineral estate owners and ditch companies. X 9. Preliminary Plat. Plat shall be twenty-four (24) inches bythirty-six (36) inches and provide information outlined in Land Use Code Section 16-4-60 (Step 2): https://library.municode.com/co/mead/codes/municipal_ code?nodeld=CD_CHI 6LA USCO ARTIVSURE S 16-4-60PRPL. Plat shall also contain appropriate signature blocks: https://www.townofinead.org/engineering Town of Mead 441 Third Street PO Box 626 Mead, CO 80542 X 10. General Development Information, including existing conditions, consistency with sketch plan, comprehensive plan and land use code. See Section 16-4-60: https: //library.municode.comlco/mead/codes/municipal code?nodeld=CD CH 16LA USCO ARTIVSURE 11. Preliminary Grading and Drainage Plan and Report. See Engineering page for requirements: https://www.townofinead.org/engineering X 12. Master Utility Plan. X 13. Preliminary Landscape Plan. See Section 16-2-150 Landscape Design: https://library.municode.com/co/mead/codes/municipal_code?nodeld=CD_CH 16 LA USCO ARTIICODEDEST S16-2-150LADE X 14. Preliminary Open Space and Ecological Characterization Plan. See Section 16-2-120 and 16-2-260: https://library.municode.com/co/mead/codes/municipal_code?nodeld=CD CH 16LA USCO ARTIICODEDEST S 16-2- 1 20PAOPSP 15. Traffic Study. See Engineering page for requirements: his://www.townofinead.org/engineering X 16. Draft Covenants and Architectural Design Guidelines, if appropriate. X 17. Mineral, Oil and Gas Rights Documentation. X 18. Soils Report and Map. X 19. Geologic Report. X 20. Colorado Historical Society Records Search. If a listing shows a significant finding, a site -specific historic survey is required. The survey shall provide information outlined in Section 16-4-60 (Step 2) of the Land Use Code. https://library.municode.com/co/mead/codes/municipal_code?nodeld=CD_CH 16 LA USCO ARTIVSURES 16-4-60PRPL X 21. Water Supply Report. X 22. Other Information. Any other information as may be requested by the Town. Applicant Certification I hereby certify that the pre -application meeting occurred (in -person or remotely) on (or around) the indicated date and that Town staff provided information regarding application submittal and the review and approval process. Applicant: z2 Date: Town of Mead 441 Third Street P.O. Box 626 Mead, CO 80542 970-535-4477 www.townofmead.org AGR ; EIYIENT FOR PAYMENT OF REVIEW AND DEVELOPMENT EXPENSES INCURRED BY THE TOWN THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this _ day of , A.D. 2018, by and between the TOWN OF MEAD, COLORADO, a municipal Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "the Town," and Scannell Properties, LLC, an Indiana limited liability company, hereinafter referred to as "the Owner/ Developer;" WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Owner/Developer owns of certain property situated in the County of Weld, State of Colorado, and legally described as follows, to -wit: See Exhibit A attached hereto. WHEREAS, the development process included all aspects of land use including but not limited to annexation, subdivision, change of land use and the installation of public improvements; and WHEREAS, the Owner/Developer desires to develop said property and has made application to the Board of Trustees of the Town of Mead for approval of annexation, initial zoning, preliminary plat and administrative site plan; and WHEREAS, the Parties hereto recognize that the cash deposits and non-refundable land use fees as specified by the Municipal Code of the Town of Mead may not be adequate to fully cover the Town's expenses in considering the referenced application, including, but not limited to, legal publications, planning services, engineering services, attorney fees, consultant fees, reproduction of material, public hearing expenses and recording documents; and WHEREAS, the Parties hereto recognize that the Town will continue to incur expenses throughout the entire development process until final completion of the development project; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual promises and conditions hereinafter contained, it is hereby agreed as follows: 1. FULL AND SEPARATE ACCOUNTING OF REVIEW AND DEVELOPMENT EXPENSES. The Town will maintain separate accounts of all monies collected and expended as a result of the review of the above referenced application throughout the development process. Monthly statements of expenses incurred and the balance remaining in the account will be made available to the Owner/Developer by the Town. Agreement for Payment of Review Expenses Page 1 of 3 2. EXPENDITURE OF FEES PAID BY THE OWNER/DEVELOPER. The Town shall expend the monies collected from the Owner/Developer in the form of land use fees and cash deposits, in the payment of expenses incurred in processing the Owner/Developer's request, throughout the development process until final completion of the project. Expenses shall include, but not limited to, fees charged to the Town for legal publications, planning services, engineering services, attorney services, consultant services, reproduction of material, public hearing expenses, the securing of permits and easements and the recording of documents. Any cash deposits held by the Town and not expended, will be refunded to the Owner/Developer, without interest, upon completion or termination of the project. 3. PAYMENT OF REVIEW AND OTHER EXPENSES BY THE OWNER/DEVELOPER. In the event that the Town incurs expenses for the review of the Owner/Developer's request, greater than the monies collected from the Owner/Developer in the form of land use fees and cash deposits, the Owner/Developer shall reimburse the Town for the additional expenses. In the event that the cash deposit drops below one half of the required deposit, the Owner/Developer shall replenish the cash deposit to its full amount. Said reimbursement and/or replenishment shall be made within ten (10) days of the Town submitting an invoice for the expenses, or a demand for the replenishment of the cash deposit. Failure by the Owner/Developer to pay within the specified time shall be cause for the Town to cease processing the application, or deny the Owner/Developer of the right to appear before Planning Commission or the Board of Trustees, or deny approval of the application, or withhold the issuance of building permits or certificates of occupancy. 4. APPLICATION TERMINATION. Except where the law or an agreement with the Town provides otherwise, the Owner/Developer may terminate his application at any time by giving written notice to the Town. The Town shall immediately take all reasonable steps necessary to terminate the accrual of costs to the Owner e.g., notify newspapers to cancel publications, etc. The Owner/Developer will continue to be liable for all costs reasonably incurred by the Town to terminate the application. 5. COLLECTION OF FEES AND COSTS. If the Owner/Developer fails to pay the fees required herein when due, the Town may take those steps necessary and authorized by law to collect the fees due, including but not limited to, filing a lien against the property of the Owner/Developer. The Town shall also be entitled to all court and attorney's fees, other costs incurred in collection and interest on the amount due at the rate of 18% per annum. 6. PERSONAL GUARANTY. In the event the Owner/Developer is a LLC, the Owner/Developer agrees that this is a personal guaranty by the Managers of the LLC for the payment of the review and other expenses. 7. ORIGINAL COUNTERPARTS. This Agreement may be executed as counterparts, each of which will be an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. Agreement for Payment of Review Expenses Page 2 of 3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Town and the Owner/Developer have caused this Agreement to be duly executed on the day and year first above written. By this acknowledgment, the undersigned hereby agreed to be bound by the terms and conditions of this agreement. (Signature Instructions: Add additional signature lines and notary certificates for each signature as may be necessary.) TOWN OF MEAD OWNER/DEVELOPER Sakt.wCL.L-PILDeGiLne, , LLG Corporate name if applicable By By Helen Migchelbrink, Town Manager STATE OF COLORADO ) )SS. COUNTY OF MAr`b. P-rle jiit i ko-, 6 en tat eims4 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20_ by as Town Manager of the Town of Mead. My commission expires: Witness my hand and official seal. STATE OF taltag ) )SS. COUNTY OF NO ) Notary Public The fore9 of g instrument was acknowledged before me this j day of tom+ i 20 j$ by U. V{ t tom' t4'4164as Ass+, mu- J My commission expires: Witness my hand and official seal. DEBORAH H. CRABTREE Hendricks County My Commission Expires July 29, 2023 otary Public Agreement for Payment of Review Expenses Page 3 of 3 TWO PARCELS OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN THE RECORDS OF WELD COUNTY ON JUNE 15, 2006, AT RECEPTION NO. 3396398, LOCATED IN SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; CONSIDERING THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 11 TO BEAR N00°36'06"W, A DISTANCE OF 2638.70 FEET BETWEEN A FOUND 7/8" REBAR WITH 2" ALUMINUM CAP "2002 LS 29425 T3N R68W S10 S11" AT THE WEST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 11 AND A FOUND 3 1/4" ALUMINUM CAP PARTIALLY LEGIBLE "FREESE ENGR 1996 LS 4392" AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 11, WITH ALL BEARINGS CONTAINED HEREIN RELATIVE THERETO. COMMENCING AT THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 11; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 11 NORTH 00°36'06" WEST, 587.76 FEET TO A POINT ON THE THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE GREAT WESTERN RAILWAY; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, NORTH 74°52'15" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 93.09 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED AT RECEPTION NO. 3396398, AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, NORTH 74°52'15" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 2648.50 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AND ALONG THE EASTERLY, NORTHERLY AND SOUTHERLY LINES OF SAID PARCEL OF LAND THE FOLLOWING TEN (10) COURSES: 1) SOUTH 00°33'29" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1788.98 FEET; 2) THENCE NORTH 89°25'20" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 672.89 FEET; 3) THENCE SOUTH 00°21'26" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 794.32 FEET; 4) THENCE SOUTH 89°04'12" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 299.72 FEET; 5) THENCE SOUTH 89°49'42" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 82.79 FEET; 6) THENCE SOUTH 00°02'56" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 510.70 FEET; 7) THENCE NORTH 89°56'25" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 100.85 FEET; 8) THENCE SOUTH 55°20'11" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 472.42 FEET; 9) THENCE SOUTH 00°06'42" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 44.79 FEET; 10) THENCE SOUTH 37°08'42" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 201.09 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE GEORGE RATERINK ANNEXATION AS DESCRIBED IN THE RECORDS OF WELD COUNTY ON SEPTEMBER 4, 1985, AT RECEPTION NO.02023519, SAID NORTHERLY LINE ALSO BEING THE NORTHERLY LINE OF LOT 12, RATERINK SUBDIVISION AS DESCRIBED IN THE RECORDS OF WELD COUNTY ON MAY 9, 1986, AT RECEPTION NO. 02053088. THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINES OF SAID GEORGE RATERINK ANNEXATION AND RATERINK SUBDIVISION, AND ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINES OF RATERINK SUBDIVISION REPLAT "A" AS DESCRIBED IN THE RECORDS OF WELD COUNTY ON DECEMBER 21, 1994, THE FOLLOWING SIX (6) COURSES: 1) NORTH 82°18'46" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 395.39 FEET 2) THENCE NORTH 58°34'53" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 428.86 FEET; 3) THENCE NORTH 48°02'02" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1095.95 FEET; 4) THENCE NORTH 44°53'35" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1083.15 FEET; 5) THENCE NORTH 23°34'29" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 367.48 FEET; 6) THENCE SOUTH 89°35'07" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 49.98 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE WILFRIED SCHULZ ANNEXATION TO THE TOWN OF MEAD AS DESCRIBED IN THE RECORDS OF WELD COUNTY ON APRIL 5, 1988, AT RECEPTION NO. 02136726; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE, THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) COURSES: 1) NORTH 00°36'06" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 28.94 FEET; 2) THENCE NORTH 02°30'49" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 283.89 FEET; 3) THENCE NORTH 02°32'49" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 449.46 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. THUS DESCRIBED TRACT CONTAINS 6,967,619 SQ. FT. OR 159.95 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, TOGETHER WITH AND SUBJECT TO ALL EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS -OF -WAY EXISTING AND/OR OF PUBLIC RECORD. Fee Deposit Annexation $2,500 $5,000 Zoning Assignment $0 $0 Preliminary Plat $750 $10,000 Site Plan $750 $10,000 Total $4,000 $25,000 SCANNELL DEVELOPMENT Scannell Properties Town of Mead PAY TO THE ORDER OF: $29,000.00 Scannell Properties 8801 River Crossing Blvd Suite 300 Indianapolis IN 46240 Twenty -Nine Thousand and 00/100 Dollars Town of Mead Fee and Deposit for Annexation, Zoning Assignment, Preliminary Plat and Site Plan. REGIONS BANK 20-14211740 DATE Aug 27, 2018 AJTHORIZED SIGNATURE 042747 042747 42747 AMOUNT ***$29,000.0I 2 Dennis J Gilmore Prspient ALTA Commitment (6-17-06) Commitment Page 1 Commitment Number: NCS-880338-CHI2 ALTA Commitment Form COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE Issued by First American Title Insurance Company First American Title Insurance Company, a Nebraska corporation ("Company"), for a valuable consideration, commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the Proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest in the !and described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges and compliance with the Requirements; all subject to the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions of this Commitment. This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the Proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A by the Company. All liability and obligation under this Commitment shall cease and terminate six (6) months after the Effective Date or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue the policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. The Company will provide a sample of the policy form upon request. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, First American Title Insurance Company has caused its corporate name and seal to be affixed by its duly authorized officers on the date shown in Schedule A. First American Title Insurance Company Jeffrey S Rotin5rpn Secrecv4 First American Title Insurance Company ALTA Commitment (6-17-06) Commitment Page 2 Commitment Number: NCS-880338-CHI2 COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE FORM SCHEDULE A 1. Effective Date: August 10, 2018 at 5:00 p.m. a. PF ALTA Owner Policy (Mead, CO) $TBD Proposed Insured: A Purchaser To Be Determined b. ALTA Loan Policy (06-17-06) $TBD Proposed Insured: A Lender To Be Determined 2. The estate or interest in the Land described or referred to in this Commitment is: Fee Simple 3. Title to the estate or interest in the Land is at the Effective Date vested in: WCR 34 & HWY 25-220, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company 4. The Land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. For informational purposes only: 159.95 /15.37 acres, northeast corner of WCR 34 & I-25, Mead, Colorado First American Title Insurance Company ALTA Commitment (6-17-06) Commitment Page 3 Commitment Number: NCS-880338-CHI2 EXHIBIT A Commitment No.: NCS-880338-CHI2 The land referred to in Schedule A is situated in the County of Weld, State of Colorado and is described as follows: A portion of the following described property: Parcel I: That portion of Section 11, Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado, more particularly described as follows: Considering the West line of the Southwest quarter of said Section 11 as bearing North 00°28'37" East and with all bearings contained herein relative thereto. Commencing at the West quarter corner of said Section 11; thence along the West line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 11 North 00°28'37" East, 587.75 feet to the Southerly line of the Great Western Railway; thence along said southerly line, North 75°56'39" East (Record N. 75°50' E), 93.10 feet to the true point of beginning; thence continuing along said southerly line, North 75°56'39" East, 2648.61 feet to the North -South centerline of said Section 11; thence along said centerline, South 00°30'05" West 1789.30 feet; thence South 89°29'55" East 672.74 feet; thence South 00°43'19" West, 794.32 feet; thence North 89°49'41" West, 300.00 feet; thence North 88°58'45" West, 82.76 feet; thence North 51°10'59" West, 2384.41 feet; thence North 90°00'00" West, 1004.00 feet to the Easterly line of Interstate Highway 25; thence along said easterly line North 03°35'37" East (Record N. 02°49'30" E.), 450 .00 feet to the true point of beginning. County of Weld, State of Colorado. Parcel II: That portion of Section 11, Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. Weld County, Colorado, more particularly described as follows: Considering the West line of the Southwest quarter of said Section 11 as bearing North 00°28'37" East and with all bearings contained herein relative thereto. Commencing at the West Quarter corner of said Section 11; thence along the West line of the Northwest quarter of said Section 11, North 00°28'37" East, 587.75 feet to the southerly line of the Great Western Railway; thence along said southerly line, North 75°56'39" East (Record N. 75°50' E.), 93 .10 feet; thence along the easterly line of Interstate Highway 25, South 03°35'37" West, 450.00 feet to the true point of beginning; thence South 90°00'00" East 1004.00 feet; thence South 51°10'59" East, 2384.41 feet; thence South 00°52'30" West, 510.57 feet to the northerly line of that certain tract platted as a recorded exemption in the Weld records; thence along the northerly and westerly lines of said recorded exemption the following Four (4) courses and distances; (1) South 89°33'46" West (Record N. 89°22'55" W.), 100.71 feet; (2) South 56°42'25" West (Record N 55°37'52" E.), 472.45 feet; (3) South 00°53'32" West (Record S. 00°11'01" E.), 44.70 feet; (4) South 36°08'28" East (Record S. 37°13'01" E.), 200.70 feet; thence along the northerly lines of the Raterink Subdivision the following Six (6) courses and distances; (1) North 81°18'32" West, 394.61 feet (2) North 57°30'28" West, 429.00 feet; (3) North 46°57'37" West 1096.31 feet; (4) North 43°49'10" West, 1083.51 feet; (5) North 22°30'04" West, 367.60 feet; (6) North 89°20'28" West, 50.00 feet to the easterly line of Interstate Highway 25; thence along said easterly line the following two (2) courses and distances; (1) parallel with and 50.00 feet perpendicularly East of the West line of the Southwest quarter of said Section 11, North 00°28'37" East 28.94 feet; (2) North 03°35'37" East (Record N. 02°49'30" E.), 283.35 feet to the true point of beginning, County of Weld, State of Colorado. NOTE: THE ABOVE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WILL BE AMENDED UPON SATISFACTION OF THE REQUIREMENTS HEREIN SET FORTH. For informational purposes only: APN(s): 120711000092 & 120711000093 First American Title Insurance Company ALTA Commitment (6-17-06) Commitment Page 4 Commitment Number: NCS-880338-CHI2 COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE FORM SCHEDULE B SECTION ONE REQUIREMENTS The following requirements must be met: 1. Pay the agreed amounts for the interest in the land and/or the mortgage to be insured. 2. Pay us the premiums, fees and charges for the policy. 3. Payment of all taxes and assessments now due and payable. 4. Receipt by the Company of a true and accurate Legal Description prepared and certified by a licensed surveyor, of the property to be insured hereunder. This commitment is subject to further requirements and/or exceptions upon review. 5. Recordation of a Warranty Deed satisfactory to the Company, from WCR 34 & HWY 25-220, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, vesting fee simple title in and to A Purchaser To Be Determined. 6. Recordation of a Deed of Trust satisfactory to the Company, from A Borrower To Be Determined, to the Public Trustee of Weld County, for the benefit of the proposed insured lender. 7. Recordation of a Partial Release of the Deed of Trust from WCR 34 & HWY 25-220, LLC to the Public Trustee of Weld County for the use of Summit Exchange Services, LLC as accommodator for Miller Motor Sports Park L.L.C. to secure an indebtedness in the principal sum of $2,335,568.00, and any other amounts and/or obligations secured thereby, dated June 12, 2006 and recorded June 15, 2006 at Reception No. 3396399, to release the property described herein. NOTE: Assignment of Deed of Trust to Landcar Life Insurance Company, a Utah corporation, and Landcar Casualty Company, a Utah corporation recorded July 24, 2006 at Reception No. 3405408. NOTE: Second Amendment to Deed of Trust in connection therewith recorded June 22, 2010 at Reception No. 3701006. NOTE: Assignment of Deed of Trust to Karen G. Miller recorded September 6, 2011 at Reception No. 3790469. NOTE: Subordination, Nondisturbance and Attornment Agreement in connection therewith recorded August 7, 2013 at Reception No. 3954401. NOTE: First Amendment to Subordination, Nondisturbance and Attornment Agreement in connection therewith recorded June 4, 2015 at Reception No. 4113217. First American Title Insurance Company ALTA Commitment (6-17-06) Commitment Page 5 Commitment Number: NCS-880338-CHI2 8. Receipt by the Company of the following documentation for WCR 34 & HWY 25-220, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company: Operating Agreement, and all amendments thereto, if any. NOTE: The Company reserves the right to make further requirements and/or exceptions upon review of the above item(s). 9. Receipt by the Company of a satisfactory Final Affidavit and Indemnity, executed by WCR 34 & HWY 25-220, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company. 10. Receipt by the Company of a satisfactory Final Affidavit and Indemnity, executed by A Purchaser To Be Determined. 11. Receipt by the Company of an ALTA/NSPS Land Title Survey, certified to First American Title Insurance Company, and in form and content satisfactory to the Company. The Company reserves the right to make further requirements and/or exceptions upon review of this survey. NOTE: This commitment is subject to further requirements and/or exceptions upon disclosure to the Company of the identity of the proposed insured purchaser. First American Title Insurance Company ALTA Commitment (6-17-06) Commitment Page 6 Commitment Number: NCS-880338-CHI2 COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE FORM SCHEDULE B SECTION TWO EXCEPTIONS Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the Public Records, but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the Public Records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the Land would disclose, and which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown in the Public Records. 5. Any and all unpaid taxes, assessments and unredeemed tax sales. 6. Water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not shown by the public records. 7. Ditches, ditch rights, and claims or title to the same, whether of record or not. 8. An easement for right of way for lateral ditch and incidental purposes granted to Martha E. McKay, as set forth in an instrument recorded February 14, 1927 in Book 772 at Page 563. 9. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations, easements and agreements as set forth in the Right of Way Conveyance recorded March 13, 1947 in Book 1199 at Page 397. 10. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations, easements and agreements as set forth in the Right - of -Way Grant recorded December 8, 1983 at Reception No. 1949467. 11. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations, easements and agreements as set forth in the Easement and Right of Way Agreement recorded January 17, 1996 at Reception No. 2472231. 12. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations, easements and agreements as set forth in the Pipeline Easement Agreement recorded February 8, 1996 at Reception No. 2475607. 13. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations, easements and agreements as set forth in the Pipeline Easement Agreement recorded September 27, 1996 at Reception No. 2513025. First American Title Insurance Company ALTA Commitment (6-17-06) Commitment Page 7 Commitment Number: NCS-880338-CHI2 14. Easements, notes, covenants, restrictions and rights -of -way as shown on the ALTA Land Title Survey, recorded December 5, 2001 at Reception No. 2906216. 15. Easements, notes, covenants, restrictions and rights -of -way as shown on the ALTA/ACSM Land Title Surveys, recorded April 11, 2006 at Reception No. 3378507 and February 26, 2009 at Reception No. 3607500. 16. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations and agreements as set forth in the Findings and Decree recorded September 29, 2010 at Reception No. 3721790. 17. Any tax, lien, fee or assessment by reason of inclusion of subject property in the East I-25 Sanitation District, as evidenced by instrument recorded May 30, 2012 at Reception No. 3849076. 18. Oil and Gas Lease recorded August 1, 2013 at Reception No. 3952631, and any and all assignments thereof or interests therein. 19. Existing leases and tenancies. 20. Any claim that the Title is subject to a trust or lien created under The Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act, 1930 (7 U.S.C. §§499a, et seq.) or the Packers and Stockyards Act (7 U.S.C. §§181 et seq.) or under similar state laws. First American Title Insurance Company ALTA Commitment (6-17-06) Commitment Page 8 Commitment Number: NCS-880338-CHI2 CONDITIONS 1. The term mortgage, when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. 2. If the proposed Insured has or acquired actual knowledge of any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclose such knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter, the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a) to comply with the requirements hereof, or (b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or (c) to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisions and Conditions and Stipulations and the Exclusions from Coverage of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. This Commitment is a contract to issue one or more title insurance policies and is not an abstract of title or a report of the condition of title. Any action or actions or rights of action that the proposed Insured may have or may bring against the Company arising out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the status of the mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment must be based on and are subject to the provisions of this Commitment. 5. The policy to be issued contains an arbitration clause. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Insurance is $2,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. You may review a copy of the arbitration rules at http://www.alta.org/. First American Title Insurance Company ALTA Commitment (6-17-06) Commitment Page 9 Commitment Number: NCS-880338-CHI2 First American Title Privacy Information We Are Committed to Safeguarding Customer Information In order to better serve your needs now and in the future, we may ask you to provide us with certain information. We understand that you may be concerned about what we will do with such information - particularly any personal or financial information. We agree that you have a right to know how we will utilize the personal information you provide to us. Therefore, together with our subsidiaries we have adopted this Privacy Policy to govern the use and handling of your personal information. Applicability This Privacy Policy governs our use of the information that you provide to us. It does not govern the manner in which we may use information we have obtained from any other source, such as information obtained from a public record or from another person or entity. First American has also adopted broader guidelines that govern our use of personal information regardless of its source. First American calls these guidelines its Fair Information Values. Types of Information Depending upon which of our services you are utilizing, the types of nonpublic personal information that we may collect include: • Information we receive from you on applications, forms and in other communications to us, whether in writing, in person, by telephone or any other means; • Information about your transactions with us, our affiliated companies, or others; and • Information we receive from a consumer reporting agency. Use of Information We request information from you for our own legitimate business purposes and not for the benefit of any nonaffiliated party. Therefore, we will not release your information to nonaffiliated parties except: (1) as necessary for us to provide the product or service you have requested of us; or (2) as permitted by law. We may, however, store such information indefinitely, including the period after which any customer relationship has ceased. Such information may be used for any internal purpose, such as quality control efforts or customer analysis. We may also provide all of the types of nonpublic personal information listed above to one or more of our affiliated companies. Such affiliated companies include financial service providers, such as title insurers, property and casualty insurers, and trust and investment advisory companies, or companies involved in real estate services, such as appraisal companies, home warranty companies and escrow companies. Furthermore, we may also provide all the information we collect, as described above, to companies that perform marketing services on our behalf, on behalf of our affiliated companies or to other financial institutions with whom we or our affiliated companies have joint marketing agreements. Former Customers Even if you are no longer our customer, our Privacy Policy will continue to apply to you. Confidentiality and Security We will use our best efforts to ensure that no unauthorized parties have access to any of your information. We restrict access to nonpublic personal information about you to those individuals and entit:cs who need to know that information to provide products or services to you. We will use nun best efforts to train and oversee our employees and agents to ensure that your information will cc handled responsibly and in accordance with this Privacy Policy and First American's Fair Information Values. We currently maintain physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards that comply with federal regulations to guard your nonpublic personal information. Information Obtained Through Our Web Site First American Financial Corporation s sensiiiwe to privacy issues on the Internet. We believe it IS important you know how we treat `he information about :rou we receive ;n the I. !ernet. In general, you can visit First American or its affiliates' Web sites on the World Wide Web without telling us ',/,o you are cr 'ovealing any information about yourself. Our Web servers collect :ne domain names, not the e-mail addresses, of visitors. This information is aggregated to measure the number of visits, average time spent on the site, pages viewed and similar information. First American uses this information to measure the use of our site and to develop ideas to improve the content of our site. There are times, however, when we may need information from you, such as your name and email address. When information is needed, we will use our best efforts to let you know at the time of collec for vow we will use the personal information. Usually, the personal information we collect is used only by u; to respond to your inquiry, process an urdar or allow you to acess specific account/prudle afa me,t'.on. If you chccse :0 share any personal information with us, we will only use it in accordance with the policies outlined above. Business Relationships First American Financial Corporation's site and its affiliates' sites may contain links to other Web sites. While we try to link only to sites that share our high standards and respect for privacy, we are not responsible for the content or the privacy practices employed by other sites. Cookies Some of First American's Web sites may make use of "cookie" technology to measure site activity and to customize information to your personal tastes. A cookie is an element of data that a Web site can send to your browser, which may then store the cookie on your hard drive. FirstAm.com uses stored cookies. The goal of this tecknoiegy is to better serve you when visiting our site, save you time when you are here and to provide you with 3 more meaningful and prcductive Web ;4, onrerience. Fair Information Values Fairness We consider consumer expectations about their privacy in all our businesses. We only offer products and services that assure a favorable balance between consumer benefits and consumer privacy. Public Record We believe that an open public record creates significant value for society, enhances consumer choice and creates consumer opportunity. We actively support an open pubiic record and emphasize its importance and contribution to our economy. Use We believe we should behave responsibly when we use information about a consumer in our business. We will obey the laws governing the collection, use and dissemination of data, Accuracy We will take reasonable steps to help assure the accuracy of the data we collect, use and disseminate. Where possible, we will take reasonable steps to correct inaccurate information. When, as with the public record, we cannot correct inaccurate information, we will take all reasonable steps to assist consumrss in identifying the source of the erroneous data so that the cmisr.met can secure the required corrections. Education We endeavor to educate the users of ou products and services, our employees and others in our industry about the importance of consumer privacy. We will instruct our employees on our fair information values and on the responsible collection and use of data. We will encourage others in our industry to collect and use information in a responsible manner. Security We will maintain appropriatr. iacilities and systems to protect against unauthorized access to and corruption of the data we maintain. Form 50 -PRIVACY (9/1/10) Page 1 of 1 Privacy Information (2001-2010 First American Financial Corporation) First American Title Insurance Company ALTA Commitment (6-17-06) Commitment Page 10 Commitment Number: NCS-880338-CHI2 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Pursuant to C.R.S. 30-10-406(3)(a) all documents received for recording or filing in the Clerk and Recorder's office shall contain a top margin of at least one inch and a left, right and bottom margin of at least one-half of an inch. The Clerk and Recorder will refuse to record or file any document that does not conform to the requirements of this section. NOTE: If this transaction includes a sale of the property and the price exceeds $100,000.00, the seller must comply with the disclosure/withholding provisions of C.R.S. 39-22-604.5 (Nonresident withholding). NOTE: Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 8-1-2 requires that "Every title insurance company shall be responsible to the proposed insured(s) subject to the terms and conditions of the title commitment, other than the effective date of the title commitment, for all matters which appear of record prior to the time of recording whenever the title insurance company, or its agent, conducts the closing and settlement service that is in conjunction with its issuance of an owner's policy of title insurance and is responsible for the recording and filing of legal documents resulting from the transaction which was closed. Pursuant to C.R.S. 10-11-122, the company will not issue its owner's policy or owner's policies of title insurance contemplated by this commitment until it has been provided a Certificate of Taxes due or other equivalent documentation from the County Treasurer or the County Treasurer's authorized agent; or until the Proposed Insured has notified or instructed the company in writing to the contrary. The subject property may be located in a special taxing district. A Certificate of Taxes due listing each taxing jurisdiction shall be obtained from the County Treasurer or the County Treasurer's authorized agent. Information regarding special districts and the boundaries of such districts may be obtained from the Board of County Commissioners, the County Clerk and Recorder, or the County Assessor. NOTE: Pursuant to CRS 10-11-123, notice is hereby given: This notice applies to owner's policy commitments containing a mineral severance instrument exception, or exceptions, in Schedule B, Section 2. A. That there is recorded evidence that a mineral estate has been severed, leased, or otherwise conveyed from the surface estate and that there is a substantial likelihood that a third party holds some or all interest in oil, gas, other minerals, or geothermal energy in the property; and B. That such mineral estate may include the right to enter and use the property without the surface owner's permission. NOTE: Pursuant to Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 8-1-2, Affirmative mechanic's lien protection for the Owner may be available (typically by deletion of Exception no. 4 of Schedule B, Section 2 of the Commitment from the Owner's Policy to be issued) upon compliance with the following conditions: A. The land described in Schedule A of this commitment must be a single family residence which includes a condominium or townhouse unit. B. No labor or materials have been furnished by mechanics or material -men for purposes of construction on the land described in Schedule A of this Commitment within the past 6 months. C. The Company must receive an appropriate affidavit indemnifying the Company against un-filed mechanic's and material -men's liens. D. The Company must receive payment of the appropriate premium. First American Title Insurance Company ALTA Commitment (6-17-06) Commitment Page 11 Commitment Number: NCS-880338-CHI2 E. If there has been construction, improvements or major repairs undertaken on the property to be purchased within six months prior to the Date of the Commitment, the requirements to obtain coverage for unrecorded liens will include: disclosure of certain construction information; financial information as to the seller, the builder and or the contractor; payment of the appropriate premium, fully executed Indemnity Agreements satisfactory to the company, and, any additional requirements as may be necessary after an examination of the aforesaid information by the Company. No coverage will be given under any circumstances for labor or material for which the insured has contracted for or agreed to pay. NOTE: Pursuant to C.R.S. 38-35-125(2) no person or entity that provides closing and settlement services for a real estate transaction shall disburse funds as a part of such services until those funds have been received and are available for immediate withdrawal as a matter of right. NOTE: C.R.S. 39-14-102 requires that a real property transfer declaration accompany any conveyance document presented for recordation in the State of Colorado. Said declaration shall be completed and signed by either the grantor or grantee. NOTE: Pursuant to CRS 10-1-128(6)(a), It is unlawful to knowingly provide false, incomplete, or misleading facts or information to an insurance company for the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the company. Penalties may include imprisonment, fines, denial of insurance and civil damages. Any insurance company or agent of an insurance company who knowingly provides false, incomplete, or misleading facts or information to a policyholder or claimant for the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the policyholder or claimant with regard to a settlement or award payable from insurance proceeds shall be reported to the Colorado division of insurance within the department of regulatory agencies. NOTE: Pursuant to Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 8-1-3, notice is hereby given of the availability of an ALTA Closing Protection Letter which may, upon request, be provided to certain parties to the transaction identified in the commitment. Nothing herein contained will be deemed to obligate the company to provide any of the coverages referred to herein unless the above conditions are fully satisfied. First American Title Insurance Company SOUTH WEST NORTH EAST Parcel Number Owner 'Address Mailing Address 120711001014 Latimer Robert A Jr. 16374 Interstate 2k Frontage Rd. Mead bib 3now Peak Ct. Loveland, CO 80538 120711001014 Latimer Tatyana 16375 Interstate 25 Frontage Rd. Mead N/A 120711000092 WCR 34 & HWY 25-220 LLC N/A 8800 N GAINEY CENTER DR STE 255 SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85258 120711000093 WCR 34 & HWY 25-220 LLC N/A 8800 N GAINEY CENTER DR STE 255 SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85258 120711001015 WCR 34 & HWY 25-220 LLC 4133 COUNTY ROAD 34 MEAD 8800 N GAINEY CENTER DR STE 255 SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85258 120711001008 WCR 34 & HWY 25-220 LLC N/A 8800 N GAINEY CENTER DR STE 255 SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85258 120711001009 WCR 34 & HWY 25-220 LLC N/A 8800 N GAINEY CENTER DR STE 255 SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85258 120711001010 WCR 34 & HWY 25-220 LLC N/A 8800 N GAINEY CENTER DR STE 255 SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85258 120711001011 WCR 34 & HWY 25-220 LLC N/A 8800 N GAINEY CENTER DR STE 255 SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85258 120711000091 Postle Properties III LLC N/A C/O JAMES POSTLE 8392 NIWOT MEADOW FARM RD NIWOT, CO 80503 120711100101 Postle Properties III LLC N/A C/O JAMES POSTLE 8392 NIWOT MEADOW FARM RD NIWOT, CO 80504 120711400095 Harris Signe 4727 County Rd. 34 Weld N/A 120711400095 Harris Kent 4728 County Rd. 34 Weld PO BOX 748 MEAD, CO 805420748 120714201002 Burch Carleen R 4221 County Rd. 32 Mead N/A 120714201002 Burch John D 4221 County Rd. 32 Mead 4221 COUNTY ROAD 32 LONGMONT, CO 80504 120714201002 Burch Family LLP 4221 County Rd. 32 Mead N/A C/O JOHN MILLER 600 LONGS PEAK AVE APT 416 LONGMONT, CO 805014004 120710406003 CJK Ranch 120710000031 Lawson Kenneth T 3768 County Rd. 36 Weld 3768 COUNTY ROAD 36 MEAD, CO 805429728 120710000031 Lawson Bonnie M 3769 County Rd. 36 Weld 120711000090 Postle Properties III LLC 4506 County Rd. 36 Weld C/O JAMES POSTLE 8392 NIWOT MEADOW FARM RD NIWOT, CO 80503 120711100104 Postle Properties III LLC N/A C/O JAMES POSTLE 8392 NIWOT MEADOW FARM RD NIWOT, CO 80504 120711100101 C/O JAMES POSTLE 8392 NIWOT MEADOW FARM RD NIWOT, CO 80504 N/A Postle Properties III LLC 120711000091 Postle Properties III LLC N/A C/O JAMES POSTLE 8392 NIWOT MEADOW FARM RD NIWOT, CO 80505 120711400094 Mckee Bill 4665 County Rd. 34 Weld 4665 COUNTY ROAD 34 PLATTEVILLE, CO 806519612 120711001012 Reyhani Hoorieh S 4135 COUNTY ROAD 34 MEAD N/A 120711001012 Reyhani Kazem 4136 COUNTY ROAD 34 MEAD 8283 N FOOTHILLS HWY BOULDER, CO 803029356 120711000086 Vavrina Daniel 4531 County Rd. 34 Weld PO BOX 968 NIWOT, CO 805440968 Oil and Gas Lease Grizzley Petroleum Company 1801 Broadway, Suite 500, Denver, CO 80202 MEAD MIXED -USE SUBDIVISION PRCLIMiNAR'Y PLAT/SKETCH PLAN Ownership and Dedioatlo/1: PRESENTS THAT THE UNDERSIGNED WCR 34 AND .� :.. .,,ORADO LIMITED :IABIUTY COMPAnY SLING THE °WINER OF DM LANE) SHOWN IN THIS PRELIMINARY PLAT AND DESCRIBED AS r01 LOWS TWO PARCELS OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN THE RECORDS OF WIELD COUNTY ON ,TUNE IS, 2006, AT RECEPTION NO 3396398. LOCATED N SZCTION 11. TOWNSHIP .3 NORTH. RANGE b8 WEST OF THE 6TH PIuNCii ._ MERIDIAN. COUNTY OF WELD. STATE Of COF.ORADO. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED A5 FOLLOWS CONSIDERING THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION II TO BEAR N00'36'06'w, A DISTANCE OF 2638 70 FEET BETWEEN A FOUND 7/8" REBAR WITH ?" ALUMINUM CAP '2002 LS 29425 13N R68W SIC Sit' Al THE WEST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 11 AND A FOUND .3 1/e ALUMINUM CAP PARTIALLY LEGIBLE "FREESE ENGR 1996 LS 4392" AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER Of SECTION T1 WITH ALL BEARINGS CONTAINED HEREIN RELATIVE THERETO. COMMENCING Al THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION II; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 11 NORTH 00'36'06' WEST, 587 76 FEET 10 A POINT ON lit THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE Of THE GREAT WESTERN RAILWAY; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT -Of - WAY LINE. NOI'TH 74'5215 EAST A DISTANCE Of 93.09 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER Of SAID PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED AT RECEPTION NO 3396398, AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING. THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT -Of -WAY LINE. NORTH 74'52'15" EAST. A DISTANCE Of 2648.50 FEET, THENCE DEPARTING SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT -Of - WAY LINE AND ALONG THE EASTERLY. NORTHERLY AND SOUTHERLY LINES OF SATO PARCEL OF LAND THE FOLLOWING TEN 410) COURSES. 1) SOUTH 00'33'29 EAST, A DISTANCE Of 178898 FEET, 2 THENCE NORTH 89'25'20' EAST, A DISTANCE Of 872.89 FEET. 3 THENCE SOUTH 00'21'26' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 794.32 FEET; 4 THENCE SOUTH 89'04'12' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 299.72 FEET, 5 THENCE SOUTH 89'49'42' NEST, A DISTANCE OF 82 79 FEET; 6 THENCE SOUTH 00'02'46' FAST, A DISTANCE OF 510 70 FEET, 7 THENCE NORTH 89'56'25" LEST, A DISTANCE Of 100.85 FEET: 8) THENCE SOUTH 55.20'I1' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 472 42 FEET; 9) THENCE SOUTH 00'06'42" EAST. A DISTANCE OF 44-79 FEET. 10) THENCE SOUTH 37178'42' EAST. A DISTANCE OF 201 09 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER Of LOT 12, RATERINK SUBDIVISION AS DESCRIBED IN THE RECORDS OF WELD COUNTY ON MAY 9. 1986. AT RECEPTION NO. 02053088, THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 12, NORTH 8218'46" WEST. A DISTANCE OF 395.39 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 7. PATERINK SUBDIVISION REPLAY "A" AS DESCRIBED IN THE RECORDS Of WELD COUNTY ON DECEMBER 21, 1994, AT RECEPTION NO 2419753; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINES OF SAID RATERINK SU8004SION REPEAT "A", THE FOLLOWING FIVE (5) COuNSES , 1) THENCE NORTH 58'34'53" WEST, A DISTANCE 01 428.86 FEET, 2) THENCE NORTH 48'02'02" WEST, A DISTANCE Of 109595 FEET; 3) THENCE NORTH 44'53'35" WEST. A DISTANCE Of 108315 FEET. 4 THENCE NORTH 23'34'29` WEST, A DISTANCE Of 367.48 FEET; 5 THENCE SOUTH 89'3507' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 49.98 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE INTERSTATE 25 RIGHT -OF- WAY LINE: THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE. THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) COURSES 1 NORTH 00'36'06" WEST. A DISTANCE OF 28.94 FEET; 2 THENCE NORTH 02'30'49" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 283.89 FEET. 3 THENCE NORTH 02'32'49" EAST, A DISTANCE Of 449.46 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT or BEGINNING THUS DESCRIBED TRACT CONTAINS 6.967,619 SO FT OR 159.95 ACRES. MORE OR LESS HAVE BY THESE PRESENTS LAID OUT. PI ATTED AND SuBDIWADED THE SAME INTO LOTS AND BLOCKS, AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. UNDER THE NAME AND STYLE OF MEAD MIXED -USE SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT/SKETCH PLAN. AND DO HEREBY DEDICATE TO THE PUBLIC ALL WAYS AND OTHER PUBLIC RIGHTS -OF - WAYS AND UTILITY EASEMENTS FOR PURPOSES SHOWN HEREON ACP 34 AND HWY 25-220, LLC NOTARY CERTIFICATE. STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF %LLD ;SS THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS -_- DAY Df 20_, BY AS OF WCR 34 AND HWY 25- 220. LLC in COMMISSION EXPIRES WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. ':OtARY PUBLIC A PARCEL OF LANK. LOCATE!) IN THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 3 iORTH, RANGE 68 W'.:S"T OF' THE 6TH P. M., COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO SHEET 1 OF .3 TOTAL AREA = 6,967,619 SQ FT, OR 159.95 ACRES, MORE. OR LESS Mead sj n Cu% v1 • ANN% AN w I O Vicinity Map NOT TO SCALE CURVE TABLE r- F , LENGTH RADIUS ' A' IA CHORD DIRECTION , CHORD LENGTH r 1- 410 12 1449 96 16.31'21- S19'36'2rE 20,•'39• 10 /0 OYr40 20.11 ;,4 C9 1 71 06 200.50 416.94! 70.11 1449.96 295.09 1449.96 r'C 16 31' 2009 1449.96 C 47'38' C7 '3300 149 50 2015.3.•560'05'01'* 9499 Ips0�20-•Y36' 16006'0111 48006'01'* 519.16.00E N24'S4'05'W N30'32'10"w Boundarr Closure Report COURSE NU2' 2'49'E LENW;IH 44946' COURSE COURSE COURSE COURSE COURSE COURSE COUR>F COU.i �e COURSE ca,Qs_ COURSE COUnS4 COORS. COURSE COURSE COURSE COURSI COURb1- COURSE N74'52'15'1 5,.2'3!'29-E N89'25'20E '4021'26'E 489'04'12"w 589'49'42"w SOO'02'56-E 148156'25-W 55"10.11"W SC; J6'42 -E 53 '08'42"E Nd218'46'W .I, .34•5.3-w • :• 1:202'W n .4.53'35"W 423'34'29'w S89'35'o r W NOO'36'06"W N32'30'49"E AREA 'V67$19 SQ F1 ERROR C.3SURE 0.01 ERROR NORTH, 0.004 EAS. 0.009 LENGTH LENGT" LENGTH LEN: T.. LENS.'„ LEN ..1•• LET LsN*•'lm LE'I Lin LENG1r LEN.. LFNC IH. LEN4•H LENGTH. LENGTH. 2648.50' 1788 98' 6 72 89' 794 32' 299 72' 32 79' 510. 70' 100.85' 472.42' 44.79' 701 09 395.39' 428 86' 1095 95' :083 15' 167 48' 49 98' 26.94' 283 89' PRE _'rIFW 1 1180015 264.72 20.09 52 72 63 95 00.4N'.. N67'10'DO"w PARCEL LINE TABLE LINE I LENGTH °PECTIC% 14651 N64'522:T 72 s6 SCr3o'i9'W .3 13409 N64's2'7,'F 179.55 No4'so'$rE ,4 .S 20 00 4251X1'03'1 .I 17167 59490'srw L : 40 98 502'30'49's 19 • 52 47 502.32'41'* .9 94 4/1 N69.45'40"w LTD 4 57 5251»'36'[ L 11 'u SD 525'05'38'1 L12 Si /5 NSY45 40-w E)3 36 03 401131149-w L14 2002 S0r32'49'w L15 67 56 N•9'4540.14 116 10 3' 425'05'36% D I Notes FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY COMMITMENT NUMBER NCS-880338, DATED MAROF 1, 2018 Al 5 00 P M . WAS ENTIRELY RELIED UPON FOR RECORDED INFORMATIOT', REGARDING RIO -ITS- Of- WAY, EASEMENTS ANC ENCUMBRANCES IN THE PREPARATION Of THIS SURVEY THE PROPERTY SHOWN AND DESCRIBED HEREON IS A PORTION Of THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN SAID TITLE COMMITMENI 2 ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON AN" DEFECT IN THIS PRELIMINARY PLAT WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT_ IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON 3 THIS PRELIMINARY PLAT IS VALID ONLY If PRINT HAS SEAL AND SIGNATURE Of SURVEYOR 4 BASIS Of BEARINGS GPS DERIVED BEARINGS BASED ON A BEARING OF NOO'36'OB'w ALONE. THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 Of SECTION II, BETWEEN A FOUND 7/8" REBAR WITH 2" ALUMINUM CAP "2002 LS 29425 T3N R68W 510 S11' AT THE WEST 1/4 CORNER Of SECTION a AND A FOUND 3 1/4" ALUMINUM CAP PARTIALLY LEGIBLE "FREESE ENGR 19% LS 4392" AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER Of SECTION 11 AS SHOWN HEREON. COLORADO STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM. NORTH ZONE. NORTH AMERICAN DATUM 1983 (NAD83) ALL BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE RELATIVE THERETO. 5. ANY PERSON WH0 KNOWINGLY REMOVES. ALTERS OR DEFACES ANY PUBLIC LAND SURvi MONUMENT AND/OR BOUNDARY MONUMENT OR ACCESSORY. COMMITS A CLASS TWC MISDEMEANOR PURSUANT TO STATE STATUTE CRS. SEC 18-4-508. WHOEVER DESTROYS. DEFACES, CHANGES. OR REMOVES TO ANOTHER PLACE ANY SECTION CORnLI. QUARTER -SECTION CORNER, OR MEANDER POST. ON ANY GOVERNMENT LINE OF SURVEY, OR WILLFULLY CUTS DOWN ANY WITNESS TREE OP ANY TREE BLAZED TO MARK THE LINE OF A GOVERNMENT SURVEY. OR WILLFULLY DEFACES, CHANGES, DR REMOVES ANY MONUMENT OR BENCH MARK OF ANY GOVERNMENT SURVEY. SHALL BE FINED UNDER THIS TITLE OR IMPRISONED NOT MORE THAN SIX MONTHS. OR BOTH 18 U S C $ 1858 6 THE DISTANCE MEASUREMENTS SHOWN HEREON ARE us suvvfv FOOT 7 DATES OF FIELDWORK APRn 4 - 6. AND JUNE 25 - 26. 2018 (CREW CHIEF T FENDICK) 8 THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS ARE MENTIONED IN THE ABOVE REFERENCED TITLE DOCUMENT AND APPEAR TO AFFECT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY BUt CANNOT BE SHOWN GRAPHICALLY THE FOLLOWING LIST CONTAINS THE TITLE DOCUMENT EXCEPTION NUMBER, DATE RECORDED. RECEPTION NUMBER AND/OR BOOK AND PAGE /8 FEB 14. 1927 OK 772. PC 563 MARCH 13. ¶94) 8K 1199. PC /10 DEC 8. 1983 REC NO 1949463977 014 DEC 5. 2001 /15 APRIL 11, 2006 FEB. 26, 2009 1116 SEPT 29. 2010 1117 MAY 30, 2012 REC. NO. 2906216 REC NO. 3378507 REC NO. 3807500 REC. NO. 3721790 REC NO. 3849076 (18 AUG 1, 2013 REC. NO. 3952631 1119 EXISTNG LEASES AND TENANCIES. /20 ANY CLAIM THAT THE TITLE IS SUBJECT TO A TRUST OR LIEN CREATED UNDER THE PERISHABLE AGRICULTURAL COMMODITIES ACT. )930 OR THE PACKERS AND STOCKYARDS ACT OR UNDER SIMILAR STATE LAWS DITCH EASEMENT (NOT SPEC, ICAIt. Y DEF INED) RIGHT OF WAY CONVEYANCE (NOT SPECIFICALLY DEFINED) RIGHT Of WAY GRANT (NO1 SPECIFICALLY DEFINED) ALTA SURVEY AL TA SURVEY AL TA SURVEY f'WOINGS AND DECREE INCLUSION OF SUBJECT PROPER I IN THE EAST I-25 SANITATION DISTRICT Olt AND GAS LEASE 9 FLOOD INFORMATION THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN ZONE X UNSHADED, AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 022 ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAIN. ACCORDING TD THE FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP; COMMUNITY --PANEL NO 08123E 1880 E. DATED JANUARY 20. 2016 THE MAP DOES NOT DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN ZONE X UNSHADED AND ZONE D FLOOD INFORMATION TS SUBJECT TO CHANGE TO SEE ALIA SURVEY PREPARED BY FLATIRONS. INC. JOB /18-71,130 IOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONCERNING SECTION LINE II ;Tit CONTOURS REPRESENTED HEREON WERE INTERPOLATED BY AUTOCAD CIVIL 30 (DIGITAL TERRAIN MODELING) SOFTWARE BETWEEN ACTUAL MEASURED SPOT ELEVATIONS. DEPENDING ON THE DISTANCE FROM A MEASURED SPOT ELEVATION AND LOCAL VARIATIONS IN TOPOGRAPHY. THE CONTOUR SHOWN MAY NOT BE AN EXACT REPRESENTATION Of THE SITE TOPOGRAPHY. THE PURPOSE OF THIS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP IS FOR 511E EVALUATION AND TO SHOW SURFACE DRAINAGE FEATURES ADDITIONAL TOPOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS MAY BE NECESSARY IN SPECIFIC AREAS OF DESIGN TOPOGRAPHY SHOWN HEREON COMPLIES WITH NATIONAL MAP ACCURACY STANDARDS_ 12. BENCHMARK INFORMATION. A GPS DERIVED ELEVATION WAS ESTABLISHED AT AN DNSITE BENCHMARK AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER Of SUB.IECT PARCEL. BEING A FOUND /5 REBAR WITH 2' ALUMINUM CAP "DB&CO PLS 2865r WITH AN ELEVATION OF 4963.64 FEET. A CHECK SHOT. 01'3. WAS TAKEN ON NGS POINT l 329. BEING A BENCHMARK DISK LOCATED 04 MILES FROM SITE, WITH A PUBLISHED ELEVATION Of 498216 FEET (NAVD88) NO DIFFERENTIAL LEVELING WAS PERFORMED TO ESTABLISH THIS ELEVATION. Surveyor. Certificate I CERTIFY THAT THIS PRELIMINARY PLAT ACCURATELY REPRESENTS THE RESULTS U' A SURVEY MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND DUNE IN ACCORD WITH APPLICABLE STATE OF COLORADO REOUIREMENTS JOHN 8. GUY TON COLORADO P L S /16406 CHAIRMAN & CF- 7 A' Kati5, INC. Board of Trustees Certificate: APPROVED THIS _ - - ,. CHAIRMAN- MEAD PLANNING COMMISSION Recorders Certificate: THIS PLAT WAS ... _ •. <ECORD IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER Of WELD COUNTY AT A M. ON THE A.D _ IN BOOK DAY OF PAGE , RECEPTION NO COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER DEPUTY KIMLEY- HORN 4582 iOUTH ULSTER STREET. SUITE 1500 DENVER CO 80237 Owner WCR 34 & HWY 25 220. LLC. 8800 N GAINEY CENTER OR STE 255 SCOTTSDALE. A2 85258-2164 Developer/Applicant SCANNEL PROPERTIES. LLC 8801 RIVER CROSSING BLVD. SUITE 300 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46240 Ann '*8 IW O M III W e N I I I IT, i - sS. I - I nn.I I, I, n ..p-.om i I, <Poi )8 NUMBF' 6-71,136 DATE: 08-16-2018 DRAWN BY. F PRESCOTT CHECKED BY ww/JK /5.C SHt ' OF .3 MEAD MIXED -USE SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT/SKETCH PLAN 1113219E 03.00 SR.., One 499e A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 11 TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH P M COUNTY OF WELD STATE OF COLORADO CRT.ST C00. SEC II ID,ND31• AM. CAPARA., I.DWE WISE END[,.06LST 7 SHEET 2 OF 3 N Lx NW , Ra 11 ,av RE., V _ _ - _ - 1091003J 263401 e 1 O CALCULATED PORTION (NOT FOUND OR SET) SVI1111R(' 1/2 ALUMINUM CAP FLATIRONS SLR -- EXISTING WATERLINE e Legend FOUND ALIOUOT MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED FOUND MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED FOUND /5 REBAR W11H 2 ALUMINUM CAN OSNCO PLS 20657 FOUND /5 REDAR NTH 1 1/2 ALUMINUM CAP FLATIRONS SU. 16.06 EDGE OF ASPHKT — v.1— PROPOSED SANITARY SIT. EINE - — PROPOSED wATERIINE ® PROPOSED SANITAIIT MANHOLE -62-1 PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY -e(p PROPOSED WATER MEIER d BACKFLOW PVEVENIER Ra ON DATi,RT A R II xR B1b% II CE - D"a t 1EL wel o Mile POINT OF BEGINNING / / / EETEEED \ LI0 C3 LOi1 ✓\\ ` L1AI-' BLOCK La \\\ 007113.1116 2760' \\,cxa R19v1 01111 , L ey v1w \\' `l-I0Q.W7 \ ' -i - - 7I. \M\--- -_ 1.1440 00_,..\\-.- e1r1B �\ « - + - '•-(1 :II'. S, 1020.63 GTI ee - -- `S:te, " \S\ A \ yEE"...— E— *S - LEO .Aa ' / LOT 2 BLOCK 1 GRAPHIC SCALE PER OM ESLE DOTE 101 PROPOSED RIIW OR ER LEST 1/2 LRWw00 S R D� PDAY a*1 ,„[l jcm" ATER SP111ABER 30.1 ACCEITED A.S Hear CA DK CD TLC A 1 gin° SEG 11 CU n 211IK, WD,�RLN, 41 scone . .SEIC CLEF' HEAT N JOB NUMBER 16 71130 DATE O6-16-2010 DRAWN OT E PRESCOTT E ECRED 1T wW/JW/JLD SHEET 2 OF 3 NV -Id IIJj:INS/LV'Id { HV VIII13Hd 90ISIAl4£I`1S .NISI-43XIVI UV3IN 'r6[ 3 iL ILOUS O CC `moo Jo I / LIJ J3 CC LL euI= VJ rrw^ VJ w X_ Sw •au/ 'suoaunld / / / / / H - • q • • `• a * I Brownstein Hyatt I Farber Schreck September 4, 2018 Town of Mead Planning and Zoning Development Attn: Chris Kennedy, Planning Director 441 Third Street Mead, CO 80542 Re: Cover Letter to Application for Annexation, Initial Zoning, Subdivision, and Site Plan Application Mr. Kennedy: We represent Scannell Properties, LLC (the "Developer") with respect to its a'quisition and development of the approximately 51.68 acres of vacant land generally located at the southeast corner of Interstate 25 and the Great Western Railroad, as more particularly described on the attached Exhibit A (the "Scannell Property"), in unincorporated Weld County. Colorado. The Developer is the contract purchaser of the Scannell Property from WCR 34 & HWY 25-220, LLC (the `Seller"), which also owns the approximately 108.27 acres that is adjacent to the Scannell Property to the south and east as more particularly described on the attached Exhibit B (the "Seller's Property"). The Scannell Property and the Seller's Property shall be referred to together as the "Property." The Developer and the Seller both desire to annex the Property into the Town of Mead, Colorado (the "Town"), to zone the Scannell Property as Light Industrial and the Seller's Property as Highway Commercial, to subdivide the Property into tour parcels cotnprised of the Scannell Property, the Seller's Property, and dedicated right-of-way, and to obtain approval of a Site Plan for the Scannell Property. The Developer and Seller have submitted applications to the Town to obtain the foregoing entitlements and approvals. This letter is delivered in connection with such application to provide the Town with additional information that may aid the Town in reviewing and approving the proposed annexation, initial zoning, Sketch Plan, Preliminary Plat, and Site Plan. BACKGROUND The Developer is under contract to purchase the Scannell Property from Seller, and intends to develop a 129,845 square foot commercial truck and dock terminal with 194 bays, an attached 9,990 square foot related office space, 7,150 square feet of breakroom pods, a 18,091 square foot maintenance building, a 192 square foot lube shed, a 105 square foot guard house, and a fueling station with a 3,000 square foot canopy (the "Project"). The Project will have a maximum height of 25 feet, a total Floor Area Ratio of 0.08, 18.97 acres of landscapes areas (which equates to about 36.7% of the Scannell Property), 234 traditional parking spaces. 214 short/pup trailer 17210969.4 staging spaces, 235 long/van staging spaces, 148 semi -truck staging spaces, 16 breakdown staging spaces, and 5 bicycle parking spaces. The Developer intends to lease the Project to an undisclosed global end user. Access to the Project will come directly off of the Interstate 25 Frontage Road, just south of where it intersects with the Great Western Railroad. The access drive can later be extended to serve the Seller's Property upon development. As shown on the Site Plan and corresponding Overall Landscape Plan, the 18.97 acres of landscaping will consist of a mix of trees, shrubs, and other vegetation intended to provide both an aesthetically pleasing palate and a visual buffer along the property lines. The perimeter landscaping will lie adjacent to a fence that plays an important role in securing the property for the end user, but also complements the landscaping and fits within the intent of the Highway Design Overlay District, which would apply to the Property upon annexation. ANALYSIS The remainder of this letter will discuss how the applications for annexation, initial zoning, Sketch Plan, Preliminary Plat, and Site Plan satisfy the applicable criteria for approval provided in the Town's Municipal Code (the "Code"). I. Criteria for Approval of an Annexation As described above, the Developer and Seller propose to annex the Property into the Town. Chapter 16, Article 8 of the Code along with the Colorado Municipal Annexation Act of 1965 (the "Act") establish the processes and requirements for annexing annexations. Until recently, the Code contained numerous requirements for an annexation in addition to those required by the Act. However, the Town recently adopted Ordinance No. 876, which amended the Code to conform with the requirements and process in the Act. While Council has approved this Code amendment, it is not yet in effect as of the submittal of this application for annexation. However, the Town Attorney has advised that the application should be submitted on the assumption that the amendment will take effect, and should comply with the Code's requirements for annexation as amended: and that if it does comply with the amended requirements, the Town will accept the application as complete. Therefore, what follows is an explanation of how the application to annex the Property complies with the requirements in the Code (as amended) and Act for approval of an annexation. 1. The proposed annexation shall conform with the requirements in state statute. The Code (as amended by Ordinance No. 876) requires that annexations conform with the requirements of the Act in order to be approved. Therefore, we will analyze whether the proposed annexation complies with the material requirements of the Act as applicable to the proposed annexation of the Property. a. Consent of the Landowners Except in limited circumstances, an annexation may only be approved with the consent of the landowners of the property subject to the annexation, which can be demonstrated through a 2 I -210969 4 public election or through submittal of an annexation petition that is "signed by persons comprising more than fifty percent of the landowners in the area and owning more than fifty percent of the area, excluding public streets, and alleys and any land owned by the annexing municipality." Colo. Const. Art. II, Section 30; C.R.S. § 31-12-104(1). Here, Seller is the sole owner of the Property and has signed the petition for annexation attached to the annexation application. b. One -Sixth Contiguity Further, the subject property must meet a minimum contiguity requirement. More specifically, the Town must find that "not less than one -sixth of the perimeter of the area proposed to be annexed is contiguous with the annexing municipality." C.R.S. §31-12-104(1)(a). While the Property is contiguous to the Town on its entire western and southern property lines, far exceeding the one -sixth contiguity requirement in the Act, as currently platted, the Property consists of two parcels, with the southern parcel representing the majority of the portion of the Property that is contiguous with the Town. However, the Act provides that "contiguity may be established by the annexation of one or more parcels in a series," meaning the northern parcel of the Property can satisfy the contiguity requirement so long as the southern parcel is annexed at the same time, in which case the contiguity of the northern and southern parcels will be combined for purposes of satisfying the one -sixth contiguity requirement. Id. Therefore, the Property satisfies the one -sixth contiguity requirement in the Act. c. Community of Interest The Town must also find that "a community of interest exists between the area proposed to be annexed and the annexing municipality; that said area is urban or will be urbanized in the near future; and that said area is integrated with or is capable of being integrated with the annexing municipality." C.R.S. § 31-12-104(1)(b). However, the fact that the subject property has satisfied the one -sixth contiguity requirement described above "shall be a basis for a finding of compliance with these requirements," unless certain facts are demonstrated at a hearing to prove, essentially, that the adult residents of the subject property do not use the services provided in the annexing municipality or work in the annexing municipality, that the landowners intend to dedicate the subject property exclusively to agricultural use for at least the next 5 years, and that it would not be physically practicable to extend municipal services to the subject property. Id. In other words, if the subject property is sufficiently contiguous with the annexing municipality, it is assumed that they share a community of interest unless it can be proven that they are in fact incompatible. Here, because the Property satisfies the one -sixth contiguity requirement, it is assumed that it satisfies he above requirements regarding the existence of a community of interest between the Property and the Town. Moreover, by virtue of submitting the applications for initial zoning, Sketch Plan, Preliminary Plat, and Site Plan, the Developer has clearly indicated its intent to develop the Scannell Property and to connect to Town services. Therefore, a community of interest exists between the Property and the Town. 3 I ? 10969.4 2. Annexation Agreement. The Developer and Seller will each submit a draft Annexation Agreement to the Town for review for their respective properties. The Annexation Agreements will be on the Town's form, subject to revisions specific to each property and the Project, which have been previously discussed with the Town's staff, such as to include vested rights. The Developer and Seller believe it is appropriate to have separate Annexation Agreements for the Scannell Property and Seller's Property because the Project will be developed immediately whereas the Seller's Property may not be developed for some time. Having separate agreements allows each agreement to address concerns unique to each property without impacting development on the other property. II. Initial Zoning The Developer has requested that the Town approve Light Industrial as the initial zoning for the Scannell Property and the Seller has requested that the Town approve Highway Commercial as the initial zoning for the Seller's Property. Per Section 16-3-10(4)(a) of the Code, "[z]oning of land during annexation may be done in accordance with the procedure and notice requirements" of Chapter 16, Article III of the Code. The Code does not provide specific criteria for approval of an initial zoning (as opposed to an application for a rezoning of a property already within the Town). Therefore, we will turn to other Town plans to determine whether Light Industrial and Highway Commercial zoning are the best fits for the Scannell Property and the Seller's Property, respectively. 1. Scannell Property — Light Industrial The Town's Comprehensive Plan ("Comp Plan") designates a significant portion of the Seller's Property and about the southern half of the Scannell Property as within the Downtown Sub -Area. This area is intended to be the "focal point of the community" and a "gathering point and vibrant destination," though the Comp Plan is clear that these intentions are centered around the portion of the Sub -Area that is west of Interstate 25 zoned DMU along the Main Street and Welker Avenue Corridors. Comp Plan, p. 50-51. As the "gateway to Old Town," development in the Downtown Sub -Area should leave a positive impression on people entering Mead. Id. The Town's Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map more specifically designates the Scannell Property primarily as "Planned Industrial Mixed Use." The Comp Plan states that the appropriate zone district for Planned Industrial Mixed Use areas is Light Industrial, and describes such areas as intended for "[l]ight manufacturing and processing operations within an enclosed structure or development with a mix of office, light industrial, and limited retail service uses." Comp Plan, p. 46. They are "[Untended to create an attractive, business park or campus -style settings." Id. The Project is a mixed -use facility with office and light industrial uses. Further, the Project offers an attractive design, with the street -facing office space presenting an upscale design that presents the positive initial impression the Town desires in the Downtown Sub -Area. Therefore, the Project is well -suited for Light Industrial zoning within the Downtown Sub -Area. Light Industrial zoning is "primarily intended to accommodate light manufacturing uses within an enclosed structure or development that provides for a mix of office, light industrial and 4 I'2I0969.4 limited retail service uses in attractive, business park settings." Code, § 16-3-30(a)(2)(d). However, the Comp Plan notes that the Town intends to create a new Business Park zone district that will differentiate campus -style business parks from more traditional light industrial uses. Comp Plan, p. 79. The Project is a mix of office and light industrial. The intended uses at the Project all fit within uses that are allowed by right in Light Industrial zoning, including "general office," "deliver and dispatch service, vehicles on -site," "indoor operation, with outdoor loading docks." Code, § 16-3-40. Light Industrial also permits a wide variety of fuel- and service -related uses by right that would allow for the maintenance shop and fueling station uses at the Project, including "auto & light truck repair," "all other vehicle repair," "gasoline service station," "fuel sale, automotive/appliance," "fuel sales, heavy vehicle," "quick lubrication," "all other vehicle service, limited," and "tire recapping & storage." Code, § 16-3-40. Therefore, the Project fits perfectly within the definition of Light Industrial use, especially considering the Town's intent to amend the Code to separate business parks into a separate zone district. Further, the Project complies with the design and site standards for Light Industrial zoning. The maximum building height of 25 feet is less than the allowed maximum height of 40 feet; the lot is larger than the minimum 1 acre; the Project complies with the minimum 20 -foot setback from streets, 0 -foot side setback, and 25 -foot rear setback applicable to Light Industrial zoning; lot coverage is only 63.3% which is less than the 80% maximum; and FAR is 0.08, which is less than the maximum FAR of 0.25. Code, § 16-3-80. Because the Property is within one quarter mile of Interstate 25, it must also comply with the design standards in the Highway Design Overlay District. Code, § 16-2-220(a). The Developer has considered these standards in the design of the improvements for the Project. Therefore, given the mix of uses and site design, the inclusion of the Scannell Property within the Downtown Sub -Area and Highway Design Overlay District, and the designation as Planned Industrial Mixed Use, Light Industrial zoning is the correct initial zoning for the Scannell Property. 2. Seller's Property — Highway Commercial The Future Land Use Map designates the Seller's Property as "Business Park," which are areas intended to be developed as "campus -style office and employment uses with integrated open space." Comp Plan, p. 46. The Comp Plan states that the appropriate zone district for Business Park areas is the to -be -created Business Park zone district and notes that two new Business Park areas were added to the Future Land Use Map within the Downtown Sub -Area in the approximate location of the Seller's Property. Comp Plan, p. 46, 51. Because the Town has not yet amended the Code to create the Business Park zone district, we must look for the next best fit for the Seller's Property. Highway Commercial zoning is "intended to accommodate retail, office and service uses conducted entirely indoors." Code, § 16-3-30(a)(2)(b). The Highway Commercial district "promotes well -designed development on sites that provide excellent transportation access," and "typically is located adjacent to major arterials." Id. Highway Commercial zoning is the closest approximation of the future Business Park zoning It also fits the Seller's Property well considering its location adjacent to Interstate 25 between State Highways 34 and 36 and the 5 I'2I0969_l planned interchange at the intersection of Interstate 25 and State Highway 36. While the Seller has not proposed a specific development program, it intends to develop the Seller's Property for uses consistent with Highway Commercial zoning. Given that the Code has not yet been amended to create such a zone district, Highway Commercial is the best fit for the Seller's Property. Though Highway Commercial and General Commercial share many allowed uses, Highway Commercial does not allow for some of the more controversial uses allowed under General Commercial, such as jails and transmission lines, or some of the more industrial -type uses, such as feed stores or manufacturing/processing, while still providing sufficient flexibility for most general retail, office, and mixed uses. Because the Seller's Property is generally located along Interstate 25 and is designated as Business Park on the Future Land Use Map, Highway Commercial is the most appropriate initial zone district for the Seller's Property. III. Criteria for Approval of a Sketch Plan and Preliminary Plat The Property is not currently configured as the Scannell Property and Seller's Property. Rather, it is comprised of two separate parcels that split the Property diagonally, as depicted on Exhibit C. Therefore, in order to reconfigure the property lines into the Scannell Property and Seller's Property, the Property will have to be resubdivided. Because the Property is greater than 10 acres in size, this must be processed as a Major Subdivision. Code, § 16-4-40(a)(l)(c). The Major Subdivision process consists of the three approvals: Sketch Plan, Preliminary Plat, and Final Plat. Code, § 16-4-40(a)(2). The Code provides that the Sketch Plan and Preliminary Plat may be processed concurrently, and the Town's Planning Director has recommended that the Developer and Seller submit a combined Sketch Plan and Preliminary Plat for review. Code, § I6 -4-40(a)(3). The Final Plat will be submitted for review and approval at a later date. A Sketch Plan and Preliminary Plat each has its own criteria for approval. What follows is an explanation of how the submitted applications satisfy each of the applicable criteria for approval. 1. Sketch Plan a. The land use mix within the project conforms to the Town of Mead Zoning District Map and furthers the goals and policies of the Town Comprehensive Plan including: (i) The proposed development promotes the Town's small town, rural character; As discussed above under annexation, the Property and the Town share a "community of interest." The Town has made policy decisions regarding future uses and development within the Town, and has adopted the Comp Plan and zone districts in the Code to memorialize those policy decisions. The Developer proposes that the Scannell Property be zoned Light Industrial and Seller proposes that the Seller's Property be zoned Highway Commercial, each of which come with the uses specified by the Town in the Code. The Project on the Scannell Property would fit 6 I '? 10969.4 squarely within the uses allowed by right under Light Industrial zoning, and though Seller does not yet have a development plan for its property, it can be assumed that it envisions the types of uses allowed in Highway Commercial. In the Comp Plan, the Town designated the Scannell Property primarily as "Planned Industrial Mixed Use and the Seller's Property as Business Park, and both properties as within the Downtown Sub -Area. Rural areas often contain the types of light industrial uses proposed on the Scannell Property and concentrate their commercial office and retail uses along the interstate, just as the Sketch Plan provides. (ii) Proposed residential development adds diversity to the Town's housing supply; Not applicable. Not residential development is proposed at this time. (iii) Proposed commercial development will benefit the Town's economic base; The Project is a substantial facility for a global end user that will bring 138 full-time jobs to the Town. Those employees and the truck drivers who visit the facility on a regular basis to drop and pick-up loads will contribute to the Town's economic base. Future development of the Seller's Property will likewise bring additional jobs to the Town and contribute significantly to the Town's economic base. (iv) Parks and open space are incorporated into the site design; Because the Project is not in proximity to any residential uses, it would not be appropriate to required that it include public parks into its design. However, the Project does include approximately 18.97 acres of landscapes areas (which equates to about 36.7% of the Scannell Property), which will add a visually pleasing element to the frontage along Interstate 25 as drivers pass through or come into the Town. In response to the Town's open space requirements, the Developer will set aside approximately 6 acres for open space, and the Seller will also set aside a minimum of 8% of the net land area for open space upon development. (v) The proposed project protects the Town's environmental quality; and The Town has adopted certain standards pertaining to environmental issues, such as minimum landscaping and maximum lot coverage requirements and protections for natural areas. Fortunately, based on currently available information, the Scannell Property does not have any critical habitats or similar natural areas that could be impacted by the proposed Project or other future development, such as wetlands, tloodplains and tloodways, wildlife travel corridors, nesting sites, or significant native trees and vegetation. The Project does comply with all of the design and site planning standards in the Code that bear a relationship to the environment, such as by providing more than the minimum required landscaping. The Seller's Property does have some wetlands; however, there is no present intention to develop or otherwise affect the wetlands, and any impacts to the wetlands resulting from development of the Project or any future development will be mitigated in conformance with all applicable state and federal permits. 7 I-210969.4 (vi) The development enhances cultural, historical, educational and/or human service opportunities. The Project does not contain a specific cultural, historical, educational, or human service component. However, it is not necessary to further all of the factors listed above under this criteria (a), only enough to justify satisfaction of the criteria. Based on the information provided above and in the Sketch Plan itself, the Sketch Plan satisfies criteria (a) because it promotes the Town's rural character, will benefit the Town's economic base, and lives up to the Town's standards for environmental quality. b. The sketch plan represents a functional system of land use and is consistent with the rationale and criteria set forth in this code and the Town Comprehensive Plan. As discussed at length above, the annexation of the Property, the initial zoning to Light Industrial and Highway Commercial, and the development of the Project are all in line with the intended future land uses for the Property described in the Comp Plan. The proposed Project provides a functional system of land use that will be compatible with, but also buffered from, future development on the Seller's Property. Therefore, this criteria of approval is satisfied. c. The utility and transportation design is adequate, given existing and planned capacities of those systems. For its size, the Project will not be an intensive user of utilities, and the utility infrastructure already in existence will be adequate to serve the Project as supplemented by off -site water and sanitary sewer extensions from Weld County Road 34 to the Scannell Property. In addition, while the Project will attract regular truck traffic, that traffic will travel directly from the Scannell Property to Interstate 25 along the Frontage Road. The Developer has requested approval to construct a right -turn lane at the intersection of the Frontage Road and the driveway to the Scannell Property to allow for the wider turning radius for larger trucks, at the Developer's sole cost and expense. This new turn lane will minimize the impact of truck traffic on the Frontage Road by allowing trucks to turn into the Project without significantly reducing their speed to negotiate the turn. Therefore, this criteria of approval is satisfied. d. Negative impacts on adjacent land uses have been identified and satisfactorily mitigated. The eventual Project is not expected to have material negative impacts on adjacent land uses, which are primarily agricultural, railway, or Interstate 25. Directly southwest of the Scannell Property is an existing U -Haul facility, which will be compatible with the intended Project and eventual development of the Seller's Property for Highway Commercial uses. To the extent any negative impacts do exist, they will be substantially mitigated by the robust landscaping buffer along the entire perimeter of the Scannell Property, the proposed fence, and sheer distance between the Project and surrounding uses. R 1 '210969.4 Finally, as described above, the Developer intends to construct a right -turn lane coming from the Frontage Road into the Project to minimize the impact on Frontage Road traffic. This will help mitigate the additional traffic expected from development of the Project by allowing the trucks to turn smoothly into the Project without forcing trucks to significantly decrease their speed. The access drive into the Project is designed such that it can later be extended into the Seller's Property to provide access to future development. The Traffic Study and CDOT recommend that dedicated right turn lanes be constructed at the Interstate 25 off -ramps. The Developer has offered to pay their proportional share for the proposed improvements into a Town escrow account to be used for the dedicated right turn lanes future construction. Therefore, this criteria of approval is satisfied. e. There is a need or desirability within the community for the applicant's development and the development will help achieve a balance of land use and/or housing types within Mead, according to Mead's goals. The Sketch Plan contemplates development of the Project and future development of the Seller's Property for Highway Commercial Uses. As described in detail above, these proposed uses fulfill the intent of the Comp Plan to develop the Scannell Property for Planned Industrial Mixed Use and the Seller's Property for Business Park uses. The mixed Light Industrial uses on the Scannell Property will complement and balance the eventual commercial office, retail, and similar uses on the Seller's Property. The fact that the Town has selected these properties for the types of development being proposed indicates that the Town has forecasted a need and desirability for these very types of development on the Property. Therefore, this criteria of approval is satisfied. 2. Preliminary Plat a. The preliminary plat represents a functional system of land use and is consistent with the rationale and criteria set forth in this code and the Town Comprehensive Plan. The Preliminary Plat satisfies this criteria in the same manner and for the same reasons as the Sketch Plan. b. The application is consistent with the approved sketch plan and incorporates the Planning Commission's recommendations and conditions of approval. The Preliminary Plat is consistent with the Sketch Plan, which is being submitted for approval contemporaneously with the Preliminary Plat. To the extent the Planning Commission has any recommendations or conditions of approval for the Preliminary Plat, the Developer and Seller will work diligently with the Town to agree on how best to incorporate them into the Preliminary Plat at that time. 9 I '2 Therefore, this criteria of approval is satisfied. c. The land use mix within the project conforms to the Town's Zoning District Map and Land Use Map and furthers the goals and policies of the Town Comprehensive Plan including: (i) The proposed development promotes the Town's small town, rural character; (ii) Proposed residential development adds diversity to the Town's housing supply; (iii) Proposed commercial development will benefit the Town's economic base; (iv) Parks and open space are incorporated into the site design; (v) The proposed project protects the Town's environmental quality; and (vi) The development enhances cultural, historical, educational and/or human service opportunities. The Preliminary Plat satisfies this criteria in the same manner and for the same reasons as the Sketch Plan. d. The utility and transportation design is adequate, given existing and planned capacities of those systems. The Preliminary Plat satisfies this criteria in the same manner and for the same reasons as the Sketch Plan. e. Negative impacts on adjacent land uses have been identified and satisfactorily mitigated. The Preliminary Plat satisfies this criteria in the same manner and for the same reasons as the Sketch Plan. f. There is a need or desirability within the community for the applicant's development and the development will help achieve a balance of land use and/or housing types within the Town of Mead. The Preliminary Plat satisfies this criteria in the same manner and for the same reasons as the Sketch Plan. IV. Criteria for Approval of a Site Plan Development of the Project requires approval of a Site Plan. Code, § 16-4-100(a). The proposed Site Plan complies with all criteria for approval set forth in the Code, as described below. 10 I '2 10969.4 1. All of the information required on a site plan is shown. The Site Plan contains all information required to be shown by the Code, as described in Section 16-4-100(b)(3) of the Code. Therefore, this criteria of approval is satisfied. 2. The lot size and lot dimensions are consistent with what is shown on the approved final plat. The Site Plan is consistent with the Preliminary Plat and Sketch Plan, both of which are being submitted for review and approval concurrent with the Site Plan. The Site Plan will also be consistent with the Final Plat, which will be submitted for review and approval in the next couple weeks. Therefore, this criteria of approval will be satisfied. 3. No buildings or structures infringe on any easements. No buildings within the Project infringe upon any easements known to the Developer. Therefore, this criteria of approval is satisfied. 4. The proposed site grading is consistent with the requirements of any applicable adopted storm drainage criteria or master drainage plans. The site grading proposed for the Project, as depicted on the Site Plan, is consistent with the requirements in the Code and Town plans. The Developer intends to construct water quality and detention facilities for the Scannell Property in accordance with Town criteria. All facilities will discharge according to historical drainage patterns. Therefore, this criteria of approval is satisfied. 5. The density and dimensions shown conform with the Town density and dimensional standards or the approved PUD requirements. The Project depicted on the Site Plan conforms with the Town's density and dimensional standards, as described above in this letter, such as setback requirements, lot coverage, and maximum height. Therefore, this criteria of approval is satisfied. 6. The applicable provisions of this Code have been adequately addressed and the proposed improvements conform to this Code. As described throughout this letter, the buildings and other improvements proposed for the Project, as well as the intended uses, all conform to the Code. The buildings comply with all design and dimensional standards, the intended uses are all allowed under the requested Light Industrial zoning, and the Project as a whole complies with the intent for development of this Scannell Property as expressed in the Comp Plan. Therefore, this criteria of approval is satisfied. V. Conclusion I hope this letter has provides a helpful summary of the proposed annexation, Sketch Plan, Preliminary Plat, and Site Plan, and how each satisfies the applicable criteria for approval in the 11 I'210969.4 Code. The Developer and Seller respectfully request approval of their applications, and look forward to developing successful projects in the Town of Mead. Attorney 12 I'2I0969.-1 I Brownstein Hyatt I Farber Schreck Exhibit A Description of Scannell Property THAT PORTION OF A PARCEL OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN THE RECORDS OF WELD COUNTY ON JUNE 15, 2006, AT RECEPTION NO. 3396398, LOCATED IN THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: CONSIDERING THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 11 TO BEAR N00°36'06"W, A DISTANCE OF 2638.70 FEET BETWEEN A FOUND 7/8" REBAR WITH 2" ALUMINUM CAP "2002 LS 29425 T3N R68W S 10 S11" AT THE WEST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 11 AND A FOUND 3 1/4" ALUMINUM CAP PARTIALLY LEGIBLE "FREESE ENGR 1996 LS 4392" AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 11, WITH ALL BEARINGS CONTAINED HEREIN RELATIVE THERETO. COMMENCING AT THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 11; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 11 NORTH 00°36'06" WEST, 587.76 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE GREAT WESTERN RAILWAY; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, NORTH 74°52'15" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 93.09 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED AT RECEPTION NO. 3396398, AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, NORTH 74°52'15" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1183.55 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, SOUTH 25°05'38" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1672.43 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 64°55'25" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1161.97 FEET; THENCE 363.13 FEET ALONG THE ARE OF A NON -TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1250.00 FEET, AN INCLUDED ANGLE OF 16°38'41" AND SUBTENDED BY A CHORD BEARING NORTH 29°34'07" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 361.85 FEET; THENCE NORTH 40°04'02" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 317.06 FEET; THENCE 1042.97 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON -TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1449.96 FEET, AN INCLUDED ANGLE OF 41°12'48", AND SUBTENDED BY A CHORD BEARING NORTH 22°57'13" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1020.63 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87°03'11" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 27.60 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF INTERSTATE 25 FRONTAGE ROAD; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, NORTH 02°32'49" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 199.74 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL CONTAINING 2,251,209 SQ.FT. OR 51.68 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. 17210969.4 Exhibit B Description of Seller's Property KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT WCR 34 AND HWY 25-220, LLC, BEING THE OWNER OF PROPERTY IN WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, EXCLUSIVE OF RIGHTS -OF -WAY, BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A PORTION OF TWO PARCELS OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN THE RECORDS OF WELD COUNTY ON JUNE 15, 2006, AT RECEPTION NO. 3396398, AND A PORTION OF THE GREAT WESTERLY RAILWAY AS DESCRIBED ON MARCH 10, 1906 IN BOOK 234, AT PAGES 92-115 LOCATED IN SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: CONSIDERING THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 11 TO BEAR N00°36'06"W, A DISTANCE OF 2638.70 FEET BETWEEN A FOUND 7/8" REBAR WITH 2" ALUMINUM CAP "2002 LS 29425 T3N R68W S10 S11" AT THE WEST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 11 AND A FOUND 3 1/4" ALUMINUM CAP PARTIALLY LEGIBLE "FREESE ENGR 1996 LS 4392" AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 11, WITH ALL BEARINGS CONTAINED HEREIN RELATIVE THERETO. COMMENCING AT THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 11; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 11 NORTH 00°36'06" WEST, 587.76 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE GREAT WESTERN RAILWAY; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, NORTH 74°52'15" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 82.59 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 25 FRONTAGE ROAD, AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE, NORTH 00°36'06" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 41.32 FEET TO A POINT ON THE CENTERLINE OF SAID RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE, NORTH 74°52'15" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 2659.03 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING SAID CENTERLINE, AND ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL OF LAND EXTENDED NORTHERLY, SOUTH 00°33'29" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1830.31 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY, EASTERLY, AND SOUTHERLY LINES OF SAID PARCEL OF LAND THE FOLLOWING NINE (9) COURSES: 1) NORTH 89°25'20" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 672.89 FEET; 2) THENCE SOUTH 00°21'26" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 794.32 FEET; 3) THENCE SOUTH 89°04'12" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 299.72 FEET; 4) THENCE SOUTH 89°49'42" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 82.79 FEET; 5) THENCE SOUTH 00°02'56" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 510.70 FEET; 6) THENCE NORTH 89°56'25" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 100.85 FEET; 14 17210969.4 7) THENCE SOUTH 55°20'11" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 472 42 FEET, 8) THENCE SOUTH 00°06'42" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 44 79 FEET, 9) THENCE SOUTH 37°08'42" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 201 09 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 12, RATERINK SUBDIVISION AS DESCRIBED IN THE RECORDS OF WELD COUNTY ON MAY 9, 1986, AT RECEPTION NO 02053088, THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 12, NORTH 82°18'46" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 395 39 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 7, RATERINK SUBDIVISION REPLAT "A" AS DESCRIBED IN THE RECORDS OF WELD COUNTY ON DECEMBER 21, 1994, AT RECEPTION NO 2419753, THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINES OF SAID RATERINK SUBDIVISION REPLAT "A", THE FOLLOWING FIVE (5) COURSES 1) NORTH 58°34'53" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 428 86 FEET, 2) THENCE NORTH 48°02'02" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1095 95 FEET, 3) THENCE NORTH 44°53'35" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1083 15 FEET, 4) THENCE NORTH 23°34'29" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 367 48 FEET, 5) THENCE SOUTH 89°35'07" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 49 98 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 25 FRONTAGE ROAD, THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) COURSES 1) NORTH 00°36'06" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 28 94 FEET, 2) THENCE NORTH 02°30'49" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 283 89 FEET, 3) THENCE NORTH 02°32'49" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 249 73 FEET, THENCE DEPARTING SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, SOUTH 87°03'11" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 27 60 FEET, THENCE 1042 97 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON -TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1449 96 FEET, AN INCLUDED ANGLE OF 41°12'48", AND SUBTENDED BY A CHORD BEARING SOUTH 22°57'13" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1020 63 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 40°04'02" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 317 06 FEET, THENCE 363 13 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON -TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1250 00 FEET, AN INCLUDED ANGLE OF 16°38'41", AND SUBTENDED BY A CHORD BEARING SOUTH 29°34'07" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 361 85 FEET, THENCE NORTH 64°55'25" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1161 97 FEET, THENCE NORTH 25°05'38" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1672 43 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 74°52'15" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1183 55 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING SAID DESCRIBED PARCEL CONTAINING 4,822,771 SQ FT , OR 110 72 ACRES, MORE OR LESS 15 17210969 4 Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck Exhibit C Depiction of Existing Property Lines for Property sissoniseas -- •yam •a6■�. I pageiiiliniiiiitarritantaC4***11111.itiana 17210969.4 neeN liNa NO NO51.8 ON WOH(<<ADIW!N NV 1d A_IiLfl N1 SVW NOLLV0I1ddV NOISIAICSf1S 4V3 N dO NMOJ 9Z 31V±S2131N1 817£ ab AiNfOO al3M Z w w Y • \ \ SITE DATA TABLE NKVV FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT FOR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT Interstate 25 & County Road 34 Mead, Colorado Prepared for: Scannell Properties, Inc 8801 River Crossing Blvd, Suite 300 Indianapolis, IN 46240 Prepared by: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 4582 South Ulster Street, Suite 1500 Denver, Colorado 80237 (303) 228-2300 KimIey>> Horn Project # 096441004 Prepared: August 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 0 CERTIFICATION 2 ENGINEERS STATEMENT 2 VICINITY MAP 3 INTRODUCTION 3 LOCATION 3 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY 4 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT 4 HISTORIC DRAINAGE SYSTEM 4 MAJOR DRAINAGE BASIN DESCRIPTION 5 SUB -BASIN AND SITE DRAINAGE 5 PROPOSED (DEVELOPED) DRAINAGE SYSTEM: 5 CRITERIA 5 RUNOFF 5 DETENTION AND WATER QUALITY 6 OUTLET STRUCTURE 6 VARIANCES FROM DESIGN STANDARDS 7 DRAINAGE FACILITY DESIGN 7 GENERAL CONCEPT 7 SB 05 7 SB 10-25 7 SB 30-40 7 SB 50-60 7 SB 65-75 7 SB 45, 80 and 95 8 SB 85-90 and 100-105 8 SB 110 and 115 8 SB 120 8 SB 125 8 SB 130-145, and 160 8 SB 150 and 155 8 SB 165 9 SB 170 9 SB 175 9 SB 180 9 SB 185 9 Off -Site Basins 9 OS 01 9 OS 02 9 OS 03 9 Kimley>>)Horn Final Drainage Report Industrial Development — 1-25 & CR 34 Storm Sewer Capacities 11 DOWNSTREAM SYSTEM 11 CONCLUSIONS 11 REFERENCES 12 APPENDIX 13 APPENDIX A - GENERAL MAPS APPENDIX B - HYDROLOGIC CALCULATIONS APPENDIX C - HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS APPENDIX D - WATER QUALITY AND DETENTION CALCULATIONS APPENDIX E - DRAINAGE MAPS Kimley>>>Horn Final Drainage Report Industrial Development —1-25 & CR 34 CERTIFICATION ENGINEERS STATEMENT "This Final Drainage Report for Industrial Development, Interstate 25 & Country Road 34", was prepared by me (or under my supervision) in accordance with the provisions of Town of Mead Design Standards and Construction Specifications, and was designed to comply with the provisions thereof. I understand that the Town of Mead does not, and will not, assume liability for drainage facilities designed by others." For Review Only By: Daniel L. Skeehan, P.E. Licensed Professional Engineer State of Colorado No. 46391 2 Kimley >>> Horn Final Drainage Report Industrial Development — 1-25 & CR 34 VICINITY MAP J A p b 136TH AVE. —1I HURON ST / SR7 I E. BASELINE RD. SITE z 0 VICINITY MAP INTRODUCTION The purpose of this Final Drainage Report is to outline the proposed drainage plan for the Mead Industrial Subdivision(the "Project") located near the northeast corner of the Interstate 25 & Country Road 34 intersection within the Town of Mead, Colorado. LOCATION The Project consists of the development of the Mead Industrial Subdivision. The Project is located in the West 1/2 of Section 11, Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, Town of Mead, State of Colorado. More specifically, the Project is generally bounded by the following: North: Great Western Rail line East: Agricultural land South: Agricultural land West: Interstate 25 Frontage Road 3 Kimley>>>Horn Final Drainage Report Industrial Development — 1-25 & CR 34 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY The Project consists of approximately 159.95 -acres per the Mead Industrial Subdivision, with 51.68 -acres (Lot 1) currently being developed in two phases. The remaining 108.27 -acres will be developed in unspecified future phases The Site is currently undeveloped agricultural land. The Site is generally covered with native fallow crops. Soils generally consist of Wiley -Colby complex and Kim Loam per the NRCS Soil Map included in Appendix A of this Report. Per the NRCS Soils Map. All of these on -site soils have a hydrologic rating of Type A & B, so the more conservative Type B will be used in all calculations. The project slopes from northeast to southwest from an elevation of ±4972 feet at the northeast corner to an elevation of ±4944 feet on the west side at a slope of about 2.0%. In the site's current configuration limited offsite run-on surface flows to an existing un-named channel along the western property boundary. In the proposed condition, it is anticipated that the offsite run-on will be re-routed through the proposed pond prior to being discharged offsite. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT The current Project involves the construction of an approximately 165,181 SF industrial/distribution building, three auxiliary maintenance buildings, surface parking, and storm sewer infrastructure intended to convey flows for currently proposed development. The current Project also includes off -site roadway improvements on the Frontage Road adjacent to the development. Landscape improvements are proposed with this Project along the Site perimeter and within open space areas. Overall, the proposed site imperviousness has been assumed to be 65 percent, which takes into account future phases of development. Water Quality and Detention for the proposed development will be provided by means of a proposed Full Spectrum Detention Pond (Pond) designed per Urban Drainage and Flood Control District (UDFCD) and Town of Mead requirements. The controlled release from the structure will outfall directly into the existing un-named channel to the East, which ultimately flows to Lake Thomas. The development program of the remaining 108.27 -acres is currently undetermined, but separate Water Quality and Detention facilities with sufficient capacity per Urban Drainage and Flood Control District (UDFCD) and Town of Mead requirements will be required. It is anticipated that the future facilities will also outfall directly into the existing un-named channel to the East, which ultimately flows to Lake Thomas. This Final Drainage Report is intended to demonstrate that the proposed drainage design and the proposed Pond for the current Project will be sufficient to serve all the above -mentioned development at its full buildout condition. HISTORIC DRAINAGE SYSTEM The historic drainage system for the Project is an un-named channel, which runs along the western limits of the site. The unnamed channel is a grass lined channel that flows from northwest to southeast adjacent to the Site. The downstream channel continues southeast of the development ultimately draining under County Road 34 and into Lake Thomas. 4 Kimley>>>Horn Final Drainage Report Industrial Development — 1-25 & CR 34 MAJOR DRAINAGE BASIN DESCRIPTION The Project site is located within the Lake Thomas drainage basin. The 100 -year floodplain from un-named channel does not encroach onto the property. Based on available National Flood Hazard Layer published by FEMA, the project site resides entirely in unshaded Zone X, areas outside of the 100-yr floodplain. Reference Appendix A of this report. SUB -BASIN AND SITE DRAINAGE The Site generally slopes from northeast to southwest at 2% towards the existing un-named channel. Any overflow from the proposed detention pond will flow directing into the un-name channel, and ultimately to Lake Thomas. It is assumed based on available information that the entirety of the on -site and off -site areas associated with the subject development currently flow to the un-named channel and Lake Thomas. Peak flow calculations for the minor and major storm events for the Historic drainage basins can be found in Appendix B of this Report. The proposed drainage design for this Project will maintain historic drainage patterns by routing all stormwater flows to the un-named channel west of the site and ultimately to Lake Thomas, including the offsite flows from the properties located east the proposed development, as well as off -site flows from the ROW. PROPOSED (DEVELOPED) DRAINAGE SYSTEM: CRITERIA The Town of Mead Design Standards and Construction Specifications, March 26, 2018 Edition and the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District (UDFCD) Criterial Manual (Volumes 1-3), were used for this report and the storm drainage system design. The Rational Method was used to calculate peak runoff from the proposed drainage basins for the 5 -year storm event (minor) and the 100 -year storm event (major). RUNOFF Runoff for the proposed development was calculated using the Rational Method in accordance to UDFCD and CCOB requirements. Runoff Coefficients from Section 600 of the Mead Design Standards and Construction Specifications were used to determine the composite coefficients for each drainage sub -basin. Times of concentrations were calculated in accordance with the UDFCD Manual and storm intensity -frequency curves were in accordance with Figure 600-1 of the Mead Design Standards and Construction Specification. Standard Form SF -3 was used to calculate the peak flows for the minor and major storm events for each proposed drainage basin. These calculations can be found in Appendix B of this Report. Developed runoff from the current project will be conveyed via overland flow, roof drains, curb and gutters, and storm inlets into the proposed on -site storm sewer. The proposed storm sewer will all be routed to the Pond that is located near the western boundary of the Project. The Pond will provide a controlled release to the downstream property in accordance with UDFCD and Mead requirements. The proposed drainage basin locations and layout of the storm sewer is shown on the Proposed Drainage Map included in Appendix F of this Report. The current Project maintains existing drainage patterns and therefore should not negatively impact downstream drainage facilities. Further detail and discussions regarding the onsite drainage patterns and runoff is provided in the Drainage Facility Design section of this Report. 5 KimleyAHorn Final Drainage Report Industrial Development — 1-25 & CR 34 The development program of the remaining 108.27 -acres is currently undetermined, but separate Water Quality and Detention facilities with sufficient capacity per Urban Drainage and Flood Control District (UDFCD) and Town of Mead requirements will be required. It is anticipated that the future facilities will also outfall directly into the existing un-named channel to the East, which ultimately flows to Lake Thomas. DETENTION AND WATER QUALITY On -site Water Quality and Detention for the current development will be provided by means of a proposed Full Spectrum Detention Pond designed per Urban Drainage and Flood Control District (UDFCD) and Town of Mead requirements. The detention and water quality requirements for this Project will be met with construction of a single pond located at the western boundary of the Site. The Pond has been sized for the overall developed conditions of the Project. The proposed pond has been designed with the assumed impervious percentages for each lot shown in Table 1 Below. Table 1: Assumed Impervious Percentages BASIN ASSUMED AREA IMPERVIOUS C5 C100 LOT 1 51.68 63 % 0.54 0.72 TOTAL SITE 51.68 63 % The Pond was sized using UDFCD's UD-Detention Version 3.07 spreadsheet. This spreadsheet was used to size the pond volume, outlet structure, and emergency spillway. The pond has been sized to provide water quality volume, Excess Urban Runoff Volume (EURV), and 100 -year storm event volume in accordance with UDFCD requirements. The total area and assumed weighted imperviousness of the developed site is approximately 51.68 acres and 63% imperviousness. Therefore, the water quality and detention volume that is required for this Project per UDFCD's spreadsheet is 6.361 acre-feet. The predeveloped 100 -year release rate is 70.9 cfs with the proposed Pond 100 -year release of 62.2 cfs. The proposed Pond will be private and maintained by the Owner. Appendix D of this Report includes the detailed calculations and output for the Pond for this Project. Per UDFC and Mead criteria, the approximate drain times for the WQCV and the EURV are 40 hours and 52 to 72 hours, respectively. Drain times for the WQCV and EURV in the proposed pond is 42 hours and 66 hours to drain 99% of the required volume. Per the Geotechnical Engineering Report prepared by Terracon Consultants Inc. dated July 26, 2018, three boring were performed in the vicinity of the proposed Pond. Groundwater was not found at two of these borings, and was measured at approximately 9 ft (EL 4947.5 ft) below the existing grade at the third borehole (EL 4946.5 ft). The bottom of the Pond is proposed at Elevation 4939.5. Based on the available information, it is assumed that perched groundwater may be present, but generally groundwater is not anticipated to affect the pond design. OUTLET STRUCTURE The UDFCD provided UD_Detention_v3.7.xlsm spreadsheet was utilized in the design of the EDB and outlet structure. Calculations can be found in Appendix D of this Report. 6 Kimley>>>Horn Final Drainage Report Industrial Development —1-25 & CR 34 VARIANCES FROM DESIGN STANDARDS There are no known variances from the Town of Mead design standards. DRAINAGE FACILITY DESIGN GENERAL CONCEPT The tributary area to this Project has been divided into 37 drainage sub basins (SB). Runoff from the on -site sub drainage basins are proposed to be routed through the development via storm sewer and ultimately discharge into the proposed on -site detention and water quality pond. The drainage areas have a weighted imperviousness and the proposed drainage system is adequately sized for the development of this Project. The proposed drainage basin locations and layout of the storm sewer is shown on the Proposed Drainage Map included in Appendix F of this Report. Refer to Table 2 for the runoff summary for the following basins. SB 05 SB 05 is approximately 0.52 acres and will consist entirely of landscaping. SB 05 has been assumed to be 2% impervious at its ultimate build out condition. The resulting runoff coefficients for this basin are 0.01 and 0.44 for the 5 -year and 100 -year storm, respectively. The tributary area from SB 05 flows off -site to the east, following its historical path. SB 10-25 SB 10, 15, 20, and 25 consist of paving, landscaping and industrial buildings. SB 10, 15, 20, 25 and 45 have been assumed to be 2, 53, 83, and 61% impervious respectively at ultimate build out condition. The resulting runoff coefficients for this basin for the 5 -year and 100 -year storm and size of these basins are included in Table 2. The tributary area from SB 10, 15, 20, 25, and 45 shall be conveyed via a proposed stormwater conveyance system to the northeast corner of the pond. SB 30-40 SB 30, 35, and 40 consist of paving, landscaping and industrial buildings. SB 30, 35, and 40 have been assumed to be 70, 83, and 72% impervious respectively at ultimate build out condition. The resulting runoff coefficients for this basin for the 5 -year and 100 -year storm and size of these basins are included in Table 2. The tributary area from SB 30, 35, and 40 shall be conveyed via a proposed stormwater conveyance system to the south end of the pond. SB 50-60 SB 50, 55, and 60 consist of paving, and industrial buildings. SB 50, 55, and 60 have been assumed to be 100, 100, and 99% impervious respectively at ultimate build out condition. The resulting runoff coefficients for this basin for the 5 -year and 100 -year storm and size of these basins are included in Table 2. The tributary area from SB 50, 55, and 60 shall be conveyed via a proposed stormwater conveyance system to the northeast corner of the pond. SB 65-75 SB 65, 70, and 75 consist of paving, landscaping and industrial buildings. SB 65, 70, and 75 have been assumed to be 99, 100, and 91% impervious respectively at ultimate build out condition. The resulting runoff coefficients for these basins for the 5 -year and 100 -year storm and size of 7 Kimley>>>Horn Final Drainage Report Industrial Development — 1-25 & CR 34 the basins are included in Table 2. The tributary area from SB 65, 70, and 75 shall be conveyed via a proposed stormwater conveyance system to the south end of the pond. SB 45, 80 and 95 SB 45, 80 and 95 consist of paving and landscape islands. SB 45, 80 and 95 have been assumed to be 24, 65 and 90% impervious respectively at ultimate build out condition. The resulting runoff coefficients for these basins for the 5 -year and 100 -year storm and size of the basins are included in Table 2. The tributary area from SB 45, 80 and 95 shall be conveyed via a proposed stormwater conveyance system to the northeast corner of the pond. SB 85-90 and 100-105 SB 85-90 and 100-105 consist of an industrial building. SB 85-90 and 100-105 have each been assumed to be 90% impervious at ultimate build out condition. The resulting runoff coefficients for these basins for the 5 -year and 100 -year storm and size of the basins are included in Table 2. The tributary area from SB 85-90 and 100-105 shall be conveyed via a proposed stormwater conveyance system to the northeast corner and the south end of the pond. SB 110 and 115 SB 110 and 115 consist entirely of paving. SB 110 and 115 have each been assumed to be 100% impervious at ultimate build out condition. The resulting runoff coefficients for these basins for the 5 -year and 100 -year storm and size of the basins are included in Table 2. The tributary area from SB 110 and 115 shall be conveyed via a proposed stormwater conveyance system to the northeast corner of the pond. SB 120 SB 120 consists of paving and landscaping. SB 120 has been assumed to be 91% impervious at ultimate build out condition. The resulting runoff coefficient for the basin for the 5 -year and 100 - year storm and size of the basins are included in Table 2. The tributary area from SB 120 shall be conveyed via a proposed stormwater conveyance system to the south end of the pond. SB 125 SB 125 is approximately 1.88 acres and will consist entirely of landscaping. SB 125 has been assumed to be 2% impervious at its ultimate build out condition. The resulting runoff coefficients for this basin are 0.01 and 0.44 for the 5 -year and 100 -year storm, respectively. The tributary area from SB 125 flows off -site to the south, following its historical path. SB 130-145, and 160 SB 130, 135, 140, 145, and 160 consist of paving, and landscaping. SB 130, 135, 140, 145, and 160 have been assumed to be 49, 2, 87, 98, and 100% impervious respectively at ultimate build out condition. The resulting runoff coefficients for these basins for the 5 -year and 100 -year storm and size of the basins are included in Table 2. The tributary area from SB 130, 135, 140, and 145 shall be conveyed via a proposed drainage swale to the north end of the pond, and SB 160 shall be conveyed via a similar proposed drainage swale to the south end of the pond. SB 150 and 155 SB 150 and 155 consist of an industrial building. SB 150 and 155 have each been assumed to be 90% impervious at ultimate build out condition. The resulting runoff coefficients for these basins for the 5 -year and 100 -year storm and size of the basins are included in Table 2. The tributary area from SB 150 and 155 shall be conveyed via a proposed stormwater conveyance system to the northeast corner and the south end of the pond. 8 Kimley >>> Horn Final Drainage Report Industrial Development — 1-25 & CR 34 SB 165 SB 165 consists entirely of paving. SB 165 has been assumed to be 100% impervious at ultimate build out condition. The resulting runoff coefficient for the basin for the 5 -year and 100 -year storm and size of the basins are included in Table 2. The tributary area from SB 165 shall be conveyed via a proposed stormwater conveyance system to the south end of the pond. SB 170 SB 170 consists of the pond. SB 170 has been assumed to be 7% impervious at ultimate build out condition. The resulting runoff coefficient for the basin for the 5 -year and 100 -year storm and size of the basins are included in Table 2. The tributary area from SB 170 shall be conveyed via a sheet flow to the pond. SB 175 SB 165 consists entirely of landscaping. SB 175 has been assumed to be 2% impervious at ultimate build out condition. The resulting runoff coefficient for the basin for the 5 -year and 100 - year storm and size of the basins are included in Table 2. The tributary area from SB 175 shall be conveyed via a proposed drainage swale to the south end of the pond. SB 180 SB 180 consists entirely of landscaping. SB 180 has been assumed to be 2% impervious at ultimate build out condition. The resulting runoff coefficient for the basin for the 5 -year and 100 - year storm and size of the basins are included in Table 2. The tributary area from SB 180 shall be conveyed via a sheet flow to the west end of the pond. SB 185 SB 185 is approximately 0.29 acres and will consist entirely of landscaping. SB 190 has been assumed to be 2% impervious at its ultimate build out condition. The resulting runoff coefficients for this basin are 0.01 and 0.44 for the 5 -year and 100 -year storm, respectively. The tributary area from SB 185 flows off -site to the southwest, following its historical path. Off -Site Basins There are three off -site drainage basins that were delineated with this Project. OS 01 Basin OS 01 consists a portion of the land off the north-eastern portion of the lot to be developed. Basin OS 01 is 4.56 acres the resulting runoff coefficients for this basin are 0.01 and 0.44 for the 5 -year and 100 -year storm, respectively. Flows from Basin OS 01 will be captured onsite and conveyed via the proposed stormwater conveyance network to the northeast corner of the pond. OS 02 Basin OS 02 consists a portion of the land off the north-eastern portion of the lot to be developed. Basin OS 02 is 0.42 acres the resulting runoff coefficients for this basin are 0.01 and 0.44 for the 5 -year and 100 -year storm, respectively. Flows from Basin OS 02 will be captured onsite and conveyed via the proposed stormwater conveyance network to the northeast corner of the pond. OS 03 Basin OS 03 consists a portion of the land off the north-eastern portion of the lot to be developed. Basin OS 03 is 0.66 acres the resulting runoff coefficients for this basin are 0.01 and 0.44 for the 9 Kimley >>> Horn Final Drainage Report Industrial Development — 1-25 & CR 34 5 -year and 100 -year storm, respectively. Flows from Basin OS 03 will be captured onsite and conveyed via the proposed stormwater conveyance network to the northeast corner of the pond. Table 2: Runoff Summary for Minor and Major Storm Events DESIGN BASIN AREA (acres) RUNOFF COEFFIECIENT PEAK FLOW (cfs) C5 C100 Q5 Q100 SB 05 0.52 0.01 0.44 0.02 1.70 SB 10 1.21 0.01 0.44 0.03 2.33 SB 15 3.35 0.45 0.67 3.47 13.76 SB 20 0.79 0.71 0.81 1.75 5.16 SB 25 2.22 0.52 0.71 3.07 10.94 SB 30 1.94 0.6 0.75 3.25 10.63 SB 35 0.82 0.71 0.81 1.76 5.18 SB 40 1.61 0.61 0.76 2.83 9.10 SB 45 3.25 0.2 0.54 1.19 8.84 SB 50 2.04 0.86 0.89 6.42 16.87 SB 55 0.67 0.86 0.89 2.14 5.63 SB 60 1.08 0.85 0.88 3.31 8.78 SB 65 1.08 0.84 0.88 3.31 8.77 SB 70 0.90 0.86 0.89 2.88 7.56 SB 75 1.16 0.78 0.85 3.30 9.16 SB 80 1.03 0.55 0.73 1.41 4.85 SB 85 0.86 0.76 0.84 2.25 6.28 SB 90 0.63 0.76 0.84 1.65 4.60 SB 95 1.43 0.86 0.89 4.36 11.45 SB 100 0.55 0.76 0.84 1.57 4.38 SB 105 0.56 0.76 0.84 1.60 4.46 SB 110 0.61 0.86 0.89 1.95 5.12 SB 115 0.33 0.86 0.89 1.05 2.76 SB 120 1.73 0.79 0.85 4.14 11.45 SB 125 1.88 0.01 0.44 0.07 6.15 SB 130 1.76 0.41 0.65 1.47 6.21 SB 135 3.34 0.01 0.44 0.12 10.93 SB 140 0.98 0.75 0.83 2.52 7.18 SB 145 2.06 0.85 0.88 6.30 16.74 SB 150 0.15 0.76 0.84 0.43 1.19 SB 155 0.15 0.76 0.84 0.43 1.19 SB 160 2.37 0.86 0.89 6.24 16.45 SB 165 4.54 0.86 0.89 12.52 32.89 SB 170 1.13 0.05 0.46 0.16 3.90 SB 175 1.84 0.01 0.44 0.07 6.02 SB 180 0.79 0.01 0.44 0.03 2.44 SB 185 0.29 0.01 0.44 0.01 0.92 OS 01 4.56 0.01 0.44 0.09 8.39 OS 02 0.42 0.01 0.44 0.01 1.05 OS 03 0.66 0.01 0.44 0.02 2.16 10 Kimiey>>>Horn Final Drainage Report Industrial Development — 1-25 & CR 34 Storm Sewer Capacities The proposed storm sewer system has been analyzed with the intent of providing adequate pipe sizing for the current 51.68 -acre development. These pipes were analyzed assuming the sub - basin areas for Lot 1 discharging to the network will have the impervious cover listed in Appendix B. No provisions have been made for the remaining 108.27 -acre. It is assumed that the future developments will have separate storm sewer systems. Generally, proposed runoff from the current Project will be routed via catch basins on the site, and curb and gutters in the parking lots, into the proposed storm sewer system. Storm sewer inlet sizing have been provided in accordance with the UDFCD's Street Capacity and Inlet Sizing Spreadsheet (UD-Inlet v4.04) for Lots 2, 3 and 5. Curb inlet capacity have been calculated assuming a maximum of 6 -inches of gutter flow in the minor storm event and a maximum of 8 - inches of gutter flow in the major storm event per UDFCD requirements. Type R have been sized with the UD-Inlet spreadsheet. Refer to Appendix E of this report for the street capacity calculations and the individual storm inlet sizing information. Additional inlet and street capacity calculations will be required for future developments. The proposed on -site storm sewer was designed to convey the 5 -year minor storm event and the 100 -year major storm event. All proposed on -site storm sewer will be routed to the Pond. StormCAD software was used to determine sizing for the proposed storm sewer system. Refer to Appendix C of this Report for all output related to the storm sewer design. Storm sewer within the lot will be private. DOWNSTREAM SYSTEM The Project proposes to maintain existing drainage patterns and flows and is not anticipated to adversely impact downstream systems. The Project will provide a Pond that has been designed per UDFCD requirements to provide a controlled release that will reduce the 100 -year discharge in the developed condition. The discharge from the pond will be piped onto the adjacent property in conformance with the existing drainage pattern. CONCLUSIONS The drainage design presented within this Final Drainage Report conforms to the Town of Mead Design Standards and Construction Specifications and the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District Manual. The analysis provided in this report identifies the proposed final drainage design for the Mead Industrial Subdivision development. The proposed improvements include the construction of utilities, drainage facilities, and lot grading necessary to support industrial/warehouse development. No known variances are being requested. The storm drainage system provided in this Final Drainage Report for the Mead Industrial Subdivision has been designed to adequately provide conveyance of the minor and major storm events for the proposed development and is not anticipated to adversely impact downstream drainage facilities. 11 Kimley )>Horn Final Drainage Report Industrial Development — 1-25 & CR 34 REFERENCES 1. Town of Mead Design Standards and Construction Specifications, Town of Mead, March 26, 2018 Edition. 2. Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual Volume 1, 2 and 3, Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, latest edition. 12 Kimley>>>Horn Final Drainage Report Industrial Development — 1-25 & CR 34 APPENDIX 13 Kimley>>>Horn Final Drainage Report Industrial Development — I-25 & CR 34 APPENDIX A — GENERAL MAPS Kimley >>) Horn Hydrologic Soil Group —Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part 40° 14' 39" N 40° 14'11"N Map Scale: 1:4,240 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet. N A 0 50 100 200 Meters 300 =Feet 0 200 400 800 1200 Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 13N WGS84 5)2200 ° woo 40° 14' 39" N 40° 14' 11" N USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey 6/14/2018 Page 1 of 4 Hydrologic Soil Group Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AO') Area of Interest (AO') Soils Soil Rating Polygons A A/D B B/D C C/D D Not rated or not available Soil Rating Lines it A •0 A/D asoe B ,,s,,,r B/D r C A C/D O 0 • 0 C The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000. C/D D Not rated or not available Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation # 1 I Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Aerial Photography Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. l his product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part Survey Area Data: Version 16, Oct 10, 2017 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales ,,.b,r D 1:50.000 or larger. Not rated or not available Soil Rating Points 0 0 ■ • A AID B B/D Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Sep 20, 2015 Oct 15, 2016 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Usi m Natural Resources Web Soil Survey aim Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey 6/14/2018 Page 2 of 4 Hydrologic Soil Group Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part Hydrologic Soil Group Map unit symbol 4 33 82 Map unit name Rating Aquolls and Aquepts. D flooded Kim loam. 3 to 5 percent A slopes Wiley -Colby complex, 1 B to 3 percent slopes Totals for Area of Interest Description Acres in AOI 0.2 4.3 64.5 69.0 Percent of AOI 0.3% Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive precipitation from long -duration storm.. The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups (A, B, C, and D) and three dual classes (A/D, B/D. and C/C). the groups are defined as follows: Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands These soils have a high rate of water transmission. Group B Soik. having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or setts of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink -swell potential, soils that have a high water table; soils that have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (A/D, BID, or C/D), the first letter is for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in their natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes. 6.2% 93.5% 100.0% USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey a Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey 6/14/2018 Page 3 of 4 Hydrologic Soil Group Weld County. Colorado, Southern Part Rating Options Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Component Percent Cutoff. None Specified Tie -break Rule: Higher USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey a Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey 6/14/2018 Page 4 of 4 National Flood Hazard Layer FIRMette 40014'40.68"N ISLID =WM 250 500 Cif VA TOOLgivan IMViktr WHIM) ,000 1,500 .t t©tNnfl NMI FEMA ��11A�T�rL o • ise tv��ar tra-�r�ftt't8� .�Ca14--eoI �o NWI M. D J, V a '�, SJ.� t0). ° �' 131 n�, ll+,�J at A i� ci a t s -. eruix Dimity 1 r m •1 $ if, an - 40°14'13.21"N Feet 1 6.000 2,000 Legend SEE FIS REPORT FOR DETAILED LEGEND AND INDEX MAP FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE) Zone A, V 49 With BFE or Depth Regulatory Floodway Zone AE, AO, AH, YE, AR OTHER AREAS OF FLOOD HAZARD CO N fv OTHER AREAS 1 jNO SCREEN 0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areas of 1% annual chance flood with average depth less than one foot or with drainage areas of less than one square mile Future Conditions 1% Annual Chance Flood Hazard zone x Area with Reduced Flood Risk due to Levee. See Notes. Area with Flood Risk due to Levee .i.4, Area of Minimal Flood Hazard Effective LOMRs Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard GENERAL - — - • m Sewer STRUCTURES Channel, IIIIIIIIIIIII Levee, Dike, Culvertor FloodwaorStory OTHER FEATURES MAP PANELS O 20.2 17.5 5'3 • Cross Sections with 1% Annual Chance Water Surface Elevation Coastal Transect Base Flood Elevation Line (BFE) Limit of Study Jurisdiction Boundary Coastal Transect Baseline Profile Baseline Hydrographic Feature Digital Data Available No Digital Data Available Unmapped N This map complies with FEMA's standards for the use of digital flood maps if it is not void as described below. The base map shown complies with FEMA's base map accuracy standards The flood hazard Information is derived directly from the authoritative NFHL web services provided by FEMA. This map was exported on 2/16/2018 at 10:47:52 AM and does not reflect changes or amendments subsequent to this date and time. The NFHL and effective information may change or become superseded by new data over time. This map image is void if the one or more of the following map elements do not appear: base map imagery, flood zone labels, legend. scale bar, map creation date, community identifiers. FIRM panel number. and FIRM effective date. Map images for unmapped and unmodernized areas cannot be used for regulatory purposes. Final Drainage Report Industrial Development — 1-25 & CR 34 APPENDIX B - HYDROLOGIC CALCULATIONS Kimley Worn Table 6-5. Runoff coefficients, c Total or Impervious Effective NRCS Hydrologic Soil Group A 2 -Year 5 -Year 10 -Year 25 -Year 50 -Year 100 -Year 500 -Year 2% 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.13 0.27 5% 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.07 0.15 0.29 10% 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.07 0.11 0.19 0.32 15% 0.07 0.08 0.08 0.1 0.15 0.23 0.35 20% 0.1 0.11 0.12 0.14 0.2 0.27 0.38 25% 0.14 0.15 0.16 0.19 0.24 0.3 0.42 30% 0.18 0.19 0.2 0.23 0.28 0.34 0.45 35% 0.21 0.23 0.24 0.27 0.32 0.38 0.48 40% 0.25 0.27 0.28 0.32 0.37 0.42 0.51 45% 0.3 0.31 0.33 0.36 0.41 0.46 0.54 50% 0.34 0.36 0.37 0.41 0.45 0.5 0.58 55% 0.39 0.4 0.42 0.45 0.49 0.54 0.61 60% 0.43 0.45 0.47 0.5 0.54 0.58 0.64 65% 0.48 0.5 0.51 0.54 0.58 0.62 0.67 70% 0.53 0.55 0.56 0.59 0.62 0.65 0.71 75% 0.58 0.6 0.61 0.64 0.66 0.69 0.7 4 On (, 0.63 (165 0.66 0.69 0.71 0.73 0.77 85% 0.68 0.7 0.71 0.74 0.75 0.77 0.8 90% 0.73 0.75 0.77 0.79 0.79 0.81 0.84 95% 0.79 0.81 0.82 0.83 0.84 0.85 0.87 100% 0.84 0.86 F 0.87 0.88 0.88 0.89 0.9 Total 0/0 Iniperviovis or Effective NRCS Hydrologic Soil Group B 2 -Year 5 -Year 10 -Year j 25 -Year 50 -Year 100 -Year 500 -Year 2% 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.26 0.34 0.44 0.54 5% 0.03 0.03 0.1 0.28 0.36 0.45 0.55 I a% 0.06 0.07 0.14 0.31 0.38 0.47 0.5 7 15% 0.09 0.11 0.18 0.34 0.41 0.5 0.59 20% 0.13 0.15 0.22 0.38 0.44 0.52 0.61 25% 0.17 0.19 0.26 0.41 0.47 0.54 0.63 30% 0.2 0.23 0.3 0.44 0.49 0.57 0.65 35% 0.24 0.27 0.34 0.47 0.52 0.59 0.66 40% 0.29 0.32 0.38 0.5 0.55 0.61 0.68 45% 0.33 0.36 0.42 0.53 0.58 0.64 0.7 50% 0.37 0.4 0.46 0.56 0.61 0.66 0.72 55% 0.42 0.45 0.5 0.6 0.63 0.68 0.74 60% 0.46 0.49 0.54 0.63 0.66 0.71 0.76 65% 0.5 0.54 0.58 0.66 0.69 0.73 0.77 70% 0.55 0.58 0.62 0.69 0.72 0.75 0.79 75% 0.6 0.63 0.66 0.72 0.75 0.78 0.81 80% 0.64 0.67 0.7 0.75 0.77 0.8 0.83 85% 0.69 0.72 0.74 0.78 0.8 0.82 0.85 90% 0.74 0.76 0.78 0.81 0.83 0.84 0.87 95% 0.79 0.81 0.82 0.85 0.86 0.87 0.88 100% 0.84 0.86 0.86 0.88 0.89 0.89 0.9 6-10 Urban Drainage and Flood Control District Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual Volume 1 March 2017 Oesigner t.ompany Uale n,l't;1'''s Project location. Version 2.00 released Irby 2011 .,. . . , - 1, , •i ,. .•I/. • '9,(1.1 -C,11 ,041 Iculation of Peak Runoff using Rational Method 520+:1 OOFCD bcSnti la NOM Also14Rst,♦SSOrea ns floor ltilt tlm NO5k55516511 fella 00 insi 2•yr 5-vr 10.10 25�i 50yr 100yrt 566gs t 10 b 4 Rainfall Intensity Equation Coefficients a 26.50 1 1000 i n 786 Kel(Nu,,11 3• L •.O 14! ♦ 9115, I- lUItN, n,maW, 5 liat ar i 1••NN•b1016‘.•,l boll) 14.41.71. It'd t > mall ,,,,,„ mull r•uiputed;, Itrgun.Nl t, If l flour rainfall oepth. Pb fin) Inc/.i - (IA Subulchmonl Name Area lac) NRCS N drol 1c Y o9 Soil Group RunOWCoefficient. C Overland (Initial) Flow Time Chann.IzedfTrwelj-Frow-Ti-m• Time of Concentration Rainfall Intensity. 1 (Irtihr) Pull Flow. Q (cisl Percent Irn ervrouanoa P sIhl 2yr 5-yr 10-yr 25yr 50yr 100-yr 500-yr Overland Flow Length L 1hl U.S Elevation Clonal Optional' D/S Elevation (hl 10 tlonsl ) Overlaid Flow Slope 5 Iltrh) Overland Flow tune t• Imml Channeilzed Flr•w Length L. ill) 1.05 Elevation 01) (Optional) DIS Elevation Ihl (Optional) ann Chetired Flow Slope 5, (h/hl NRCS Conveyance Factor K Char•nehzed Ftow velocity V. Itusec) Channaltzeo Flow f Imo 1, On ml Computed 1, (mini Houtonal t (171111) Selecte0 1. (rain) 2-yr 5-yr 10-yr 25•yr SO-yr 100-yr 500yr 2-yr 5•yr 10-yr 2Syr 50r 100•yr 500-yr Al i.15• ;, 1 J U ell 0.01 0.07 0.26 0.34 044 0.54 ;,2.00 0.209 5 1fi 1. UQ O..rry 20 9 14 U.W : ' �(i 254361000 1 22 2.98 3 /3 5 0? c: IC -% :,i 11 iy ') Ci' :102 0 14 C i,9 1 09 ' /0 1 16 , f li• 1 . ' ', 2 p 0 01 0.01 0.07 025 034 13.44 054 400.00 0.020 7 Dis , 0.023 213 pi t ld 79 ?F 30.39 29 26 1 110 • 7c 7 2G 2 % 3 6', 4 4' . 67 J Cie , U1 J :J 0 94 • ,O 7 11 1 in , id Y. - 62.8 0.40 043 0.48 0 58 0112 OBI U 79 ,..4, :� u.J3J 1S ''b ,17'' .t. 0.022 20 I y+ ' eJ 'u `H' 19.25 1� 11x1 / dI / to a Ov '. N '� ': I '•. v! 14 % v• ! 9.6' .'1 -,t ', !1; :l i' +d P. CI 5 0 61 0.70 0.72 0.77 0.79 0.81 084 .E •. 13.5 9 y^ ~ 0.ti .'l ;eV , , ._ 0 W A 30 1 i V 78 30 139 3 t 9 Ml 5 4, !S lia A ]? 12 07 '. 75 2 79 12i . '4 16 ? 5P y - id 25 _ U 61 Oa, 050 0.55 063 0.67 071 076 245 00 J 037 1091• 9 04.5. 203 1 41 125 '2+9 16 9li 1219 204 2'4 .44 484 •. • •1017 693 it;' 472 653 849 091 751 a y , ..d A' • _,.. o •;r,•, 055 I 58 0.62 069 072 015 0/9 268.00 .35 10 •b ... 3 0 20 200 ,;6y 7fiC to 10. 2 •5 281 30? 4 @8 % 31 !1g 709' ? 2? 175 4 36 i' 8 3' 1^6? +6 ,9u ... 166 069 0. 077 018 0.81 084 . E 4.t 024 86 .' ,'. 2U 2(Ili :13 'M +114 901 ?1n }09 )6E .. .,a4 r8: 1'!0 15 !6 '?9 .' 416 7,18 6^) _ 'd 4!' I n (a t t b 0 : 060 0.63 0 1 073 0 6 080 225.01. )21221.,2)21221., v— 9 97 .)4614 , ,' .. 20 2 19 ; As '0.76 14 14 10 255 2 0 295 3 7(1 4 'M r 7 41, 1' 14 • GO : 81 1 18 5 60 + +6 9 10 14 11 _ • .0 45 g :4 3 0 16 ' 18 01 0.40 0 46 054 1.62 l41U.W 7.074 ?1 mil t 20 2.9(1 75 23 1? 24 71 73 7? 49 700 7 5 t I 1N 4 lt: 5 05 7 ;', 0 /, • 17 : On ; ;0 3 ?6 b ea 15 t3 ';SS Su5 . ,S b i W 0 064 in 0.86 0 88 0 89 0 .9 090 2%870 6 024 118 5 .n, Jam;,, 20 2.83 U.12 5 31 9 26 5 J+ / 73 147 1 0' ') / l 7 W 9 lb 11 8'1 1 61• 6 41 n 1/ 1 1 '1 1182 n, b7 15 55 .d5'; .,•., u 'Ouse • 0.86 7.86 0.88 089 089 090 y.y1 W „1r. /bb 6666 O.u' 20 728 0113 119 955 500 t 76 1 / 4tt3 ', II ; r' 94: 1S 1' ",5 . •. ,• !• 1 7• 401 503 A 6' •d 1Y' 1 't) y ., ] .. 064 •: �T�`1r� ' '1' i 32 L a 012 5 0) SS sir 0.0141 20 2 D C 48 5 50 9.60 / 7i 364 ::J, r. i •'-r 1' !, ? 40 3 J' ( :'7 :n r5 r 18 78 J • 0 1:31: 'r a :! 054 QFS E 088 '88 0.1 «::1 •I s 519 k.‘ uo O DOW 20 1 9C 012 551 9 53 55' 271 364 496 5'5 7t• y'5 117x. _ 11' 4.0 576 r ?'7 R 7 ' it ' 086 7.68 D 68 089 069 090 4. 19 ...Joni , ' : 20 2 1E .` 18 434 y 16 5 0" : 78 3 7? 4 6{? C 31 "• 3 c; 14 1 ' ; ;F? : BA 164 498 c '9 ? 56 ' . d' :i3 :5. t It 075 077 9.79 0 82 O 84 0.85 0.87 t, it. 1 .424 - 15 w r u 1c LCt 2.53 10 ` 79 10.60 ,4 3 68 ; 5' +. 21 76S 915 11 9f 2 3A s ; ?< 5 9? 43 : 16 4 'a: .4 :;166' 1 ,.1 - 64.0 0.50 3 53 058 0 65 068 0 73 0 77 Ou D 043 20 4 16 0 29 '418 1S 34 14 18 • 41 2 S€ 3 72 4 11 534 G 46 9 69 098 9' 2 5? ] 76 485 • ,d All 1 nr, b ql.0 0.74 0 76 0.78 0 81 0 :3 084 0.87 _• ntfli / - •A, l., 111110 211 100 ; Sb 6 76 11 1i 6 76 7 56 3 42 419 • %N ! 17 561 12 93 !. 6? ...• ; 89 4 05 " Ob 6 28 '•'.J '(3 9U v 0,, Q 4) U i 74 0 76 0.70 0.81 '.83 084 0.87 i .;i: 4.070 6 J t 116-3U 0.1310 c� 1.W 0 S5 6 76 t t 21 2 55 3 42 4 14 '. 78 , '! 8 64 1: Yt ' ' 8 1 06 t •2 2 97 1 I? 4 60 ' 0:, 1 t isiat •iJ 05 1 43 b n, ,, 0.:. 0.86 �i .T.• 9 D :9 1.90 r 4, 0.t Rt) 61 143!1 '•'127 :.i; 329 ,)12 594Sini btt / 65 ) r.•b d 'i l: t: l ) I 1 .ip 6 7f.4 I'a, i 1 i, ;;1 !S4 978 •1: `, i5 5111 11.8.1 v hs g 11 U 0 74 0 76 0.78 U.81 0 83 U10 0-87 QV) U.Utp -• U OIU . I.: 1 Du r 00 .1 Pr1010 5710 2 76 t T's 4 otl ,, f 1 ! ,! 'i : , + : t ' • , •5; U7 : 81 ! :i5 S ib !. ,,• !ifs ION :, St. .7 '76 778 8t 9: 084 d O.O1p �� 519 ..r, 4.01010 ;i 1 OO C 00 4 2 16.40 278 373 468 531 . • 943 t<: • '. 6J ?05 286 J6' 446 a84 ' 1111 661 8 084 086 086 088 089 089 090 '1.030 404 1_i.i.16 u.u30 1A 346 r 00 4'"a 9.00 500 278 373 '168 631 777 c 14 1* •4• • c-• 338 520 St? 7?E its 115 G.J:f 6 •.:r. ; TIM 086 0.86 QM 0 89 0 89 C 90 9.012 508 ' 0.012 26 1 ' , Q 00 - .c 900 506 7 17 377 4 67 d 79 T 74 9 40 14 06 0 re • OS ' .'.3 • 8? 226 2 76 4 19 .b liu / 13 b _! 0T5 076 079 0.62 084 OHS 087 4 u.u16 276.32 T2P Ir UI� :YI r 14,, '88 A9 916 119 I11' ht N (. SC 7;! i /9' S 1 14•. o?q 7Si 514 175 174 ti .• a 0.01 0.01 0.07 028 0 .34 O 44 Q Sil ,, 1r .. +.IQ 4 3� u Ol' , `u'O 20 1:1 t U ; tl! 4 + 2b bb 10 00 I .7 2 +3b '1 ; ' 5 '1J " X' •' 51 1 • 25 :i :14 ' 0 % a :'1 J : i } 95 t, 1'i ' ' so ,b l.Li I Ile K -!n . •' ✓ `1 Tiinin 060 0 61 0 71 •-4J.Ih, „Ill ' .., :l, 1 bb 1116 59 16 S! aiiis1' 1 'd 7 (ifi 3 fl ! 4 41, . El R ' ' 0' ` 4i 1Z 3 53 a 70 ri ?, •. ) ' t N15 ', 1. i ,.; s .4 WHIM 0.' MI 034 044 0.54 , 7 , v 4 , •. 213 , 41 454 763 35 45 1 112 298 373 50:1 02r 75;2 11 i,5 106 'I'A 091 440 702 "9'I "142 h lot e it I ' •7/ tES MEM 0 6' 1.01 ' 8 C 85 /,J, 44. H. 8 31 I 0 114, 20 134 0 QO d 35 1129 1 6; 3 49 436 5 % 7 26 A 8' 13 19 • 0' : 'ii 3 28 4 t3U 5 79 / 18 ...a....--,, 43 145 :.•C 0.62 054 0.65 a 87 088 0 $$ 090 t,q,Uti ,46 S r 6 -r +4 1 I41(1 20 4 OCT J 29 -5 b 545 7 71 3 05 S 57 6 ' d 59 9 2' 13 7' f: JO 8 00 0 99• 3 69h 71 l'; 42 Al 1711 , tr -L _ 0.74 0.76 0.78 0.81 0.83 0 87 r 0U IS Tutu • c 5C -, , :4) 200 Oq 4 623 106?5 00 2 19 3 73 468 6 31 7 77 943 14 1' 3 1• ;, 41 J56 0 ?7 r. o- ' 19 1 8] •i, 155 a I•` •� ,,i, r, '� 476 078 061 '83 0b•: 087 .1480 ., .,ill c5^, . +�1 • .• :L 1 00 0 t3 4imiiir w 81 T;9 7;3 46b 6)t 7 9t_ ttt' 11' 34) a:,5 . C'. 0 97 19 160 _.a- it 166 7J. B •, INN 065 086 06 0.86 089 080 IO ac. 1 90W 41J JUIt, AI 153 1.34 y''7 ,025 thins2=r_ 305 188 r. 1: 6ai 78+ 11 68 451 621 790 ':, 8= '3 47 •:. 45 2493 II 1t.5 4 :: b tall ' 86 0 80 ' 08 D 6e D a9 D 90 ,, a !, J1)1 +ilk: o 014 Al 3 v, + ,a a ' ,o.00 11 . 7 a L i 1. 434 •. 44 ( r� " . 12 1 9 3? . , „ ,. ' ` , 83 21 66 )t, 9a i) 6', 49 6; di tlU i 1 d 0.01 0.06 0.15 0'. 037 040 056 o4 2u 'J 1u;, __ -5.91 01h15 2U '4' 293 Vb5 3U de ,'l:' 19h 1!' ', i.! 1 1' "'/ 11 25 _ J.to ;i try 0411 167' 1'o 71c, -di W. 1 .c1 5 ..., • t D.r1 1 i 0 0 D44 0.54 :al, '- 1 ' ( 464 J.i7 1L 1014 19 lit '1 16 - @;6. JJ /4 117 2 98 3 73 ', 0:. •; r •l' ', i, 1 i JS 004 7 U O 50 I 4? 3 A. h 07 '+ • 2� N WuWuIy 1. r,• 1.1 ' i1 t7 atiac � `'i� 154 R.1416, ,JJ 11 54 I7.' 1 )';.; 2U d 60U 1117 - - 15 00 109 1 $ ' 7 52 4 7 5 5:54 7 ;)S 10 62 0 O 1 J 03 327 0 96 1 57 4 44 / Sfi Ott 105 • „C, -, 0.01 0.01 0.07 0-26 CE 0 44 054 13.0E v :, l l le Il. • • YL ? tit 000 • • 25 611 10.E0 ' '5 288 3 6: 4 88 6 04 7 79 10 9' 3 3' 3 0' 3 G8 0 37 0 59 0 92 t +: __-�- ,5 A', ',v81 ,. ~� ,l fit cti 569 0.00 - s;•6 20 0.01 0.01 0.07 t(�1� 0 ,44 051 „�+.ca. vu11 '`:' UJII _u 191: 170 3'e:' 31.43 1 '?5 '6' I'.` 281 3413 4):' ;i1 1O', 709 )'O 13% Die 839 •5 u7 1 . 4.' ..ZE ! 8 'I•I, • 01 007 326 034 1 44 051 »5 p(i •11. U 041 .1. 1 Iki 0.00 ' A•' 25.06 ;n /?H 2tlt, 1A'. 4/4 , ti: S 6' ] :,' ;l 0 • 'i C9 .. 68 ' Ca t 1., ur•t. 5 1 0.'l 00, 007 ) 0 044 0 4u 00 ,•,+L 7u 0010 :C 1 0 1.36 14 lc 26.114 1 272 298 37) c33 6X 752 P25 JO• ,1U/ :'9 Gb' • 19 216 4114 i Area -Weighted Runoff Coefficient Calculations i Designer: Company: Date: 8/21/2018 Project: Location: Version 2.00 released May 2017 Subcatchment Name SB 13t'.-145 —a, LEND : Flow Direction 4 Catchin enr Boundary - Cells of this color are for required user -input Cells of this color are for optional override values ;-Cells of this color are for calculated results based on overrides See sheet "Design Info" for imperiinusness-based runoff f ow( it values. Sub -Area ID Att,a (ac) MRCS Hydrologic Soil Group Imperviousness Percent Runoff Coefficient, C 2-yr 5-yr 10-yr 25-yr 50-yr 100-yr 500-yr SB 130 B 48.5 0.36 0.39 0.45 0.55 G.60 0.65 0.71 SI3 135 3.34 B 2.0 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.26 0.34 �_' 44 6.54 SB 140 0.98 B 87.1 0.71 0.74 0.76 0.80 0 91 0.83 0.85 SB 145 2.06 B 98.1 0.82 0.84 ' 35 0.87 0 i8 0.88 0.90 Total Area (ac) 8.14 Area Area -Weighted -Weighted Override C 0.37 0.39 0.43 0.54 0.59 0.64 0.71 C 0.37 0.39 0.43 0.54 0.59 0.64 0.71 Mead-UD-RATIONAL 2.00.xlsm, Sub-SB 105, 130-145 Weighted C 8/21/2018, 3:05 PM Area -Weighted Runoff Coefficient Calculations Version 2.00 released May 2017 Designer: Company: Date: 8/21/2018 Project: Location: Subcatchment Name SB 160, 175 LE GEND : Flow Direction Catchm eni B oundary Cells of this color are for required user -input Cells of this color are for optional override values Cells of this color are for calculated results based or overrides See sheet "Design Info" for imperviousness -based runoff coefficient values. Area (ac) Hydrologic Soil NRCS Group Runoff Coefficient, C Sub -Area ID Percent Imperviousness 2-yr 5-yr 10-yr 25-yr 50-yr 100-yr 500-yr 2.37 B 99.6 0.83 0.85 0.86 0.87 0.88 0.89 0.90 SB 160 Ir 1.84 B 2.0 0 01 0.01 0.07 0.26 0.34 0.44 0.54 SB 175 r i . , . I I Total Area (ac) 4.21 Area -Weighted Area -Weighted C 0.47 0.49 0.52 0.61 0.65 0.69 _ 0.74 Override C 0.47 0.49 0.52 0.61 0.65 0.69 0.74 Mead-UD-RATIONAL 2.00.xlsm, Sub-SB 160. 175 Weighted C 8/2112C18 3:06 PM Final Drainage Report Industrial Development — 1-25 & CR 34 APPENDIX C - HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS Kimley »Horn Mead Industrial Subdivision Scenario: 100 YR Active Scenario: 100 YR STRM-A-1 TRM-A- STRM) STRM-A-8 SIRM-O-1 1 RM-G2 (STRM) _,TR M -A5-3 RM-A-7 7 STRM-A5-1 RM-A5-2 STRM-A-6 ' STRM STR M -A3- 7 4-5 STRM- '-3 ST ' -A4- R D 1 ►. STRIA -Mel STRM-M STR M -A6- R D1 STRM-B-9 (STRM) STRM-B-8 SIR M -A-2 STRM-A-1 STR WA." 1 STRM-A-4 RM-A-5 STRM-A-3 STRM-A1-4 STRM-A1-3 STRM-A1-2 STRM-A1-1 SIR M -A2 -R D1 3TRM-41C• I STRM-A3-RD1 STRM-B3-RD1 Mead Industrial Subdivision FlexTable: Conduit Table Active Scenario: 5 Wit Label Start Node - Invert (Start) (ft) Length (Scaled) (ft) _ Slope (Calculated) (ft/ft) Diameter (in) , Manning's n y Flow (cfs) Depth (Out) (ft) ' - Capacity (Full Flow) P (cfs) Flow / Capacity (Design) - (%) , Depth (Normal) / Rise (°/0) ° Elevation Ground (Start) (ft) Elevation Ground (Stop) (ft) Hydraulic Grade Line ' (In) (ft) Hydraulic Grade Line (Out) (ft) , Cover (Start) , (ft) Cover,, ; (Stop) (ft) , Velocity (ft/s) A-1 TO A-2 STRM-A-1 48 00 122 1 0 005 24 0 0 013 3 19 0 80 15 99 20 0 30 3 53 40 53 75 48 62 48 19 3 40 4 36 3 97 A-2 TO A-3 STRM-A-2 47 29 120 2 0 005 24 0 0 013 4 66 1 09 15 98 29 1 37 0 53 75 54 09 48 05 47 78 4 46 5 40 4 41 A-3 TO A-4 STRM-A-3 46 59 158 1 0 005 24 0 0 013 7 87 0 99 15 99 49 2 49 5 54 09 57 06 47 59 46 79 5 50 9 26 5 07 A4 TO A-5 STRM-A-4 45 30 231 5 0 005 30 0 0 013 5 71 1 41 29 03 19 7 30 1 57 06 56 92 46 09 45 55 9 26 10 28 4 60 A-5 TO A-6 STRM-A-5 44 04 110 3 0 005 30 0 0 013 11 26 1 08 28 96 38 9 43 3 56 92 57 74 45 16 44 57 10 38 11 75 5 53 A6 TO A-7 STRM-A-6 43 00 208 1 0 005 36 0 0 013 12 31 1 31 47 14 26 1 34 9 57 74 55 87 44 11 43 27 11 74 10 91 5 61 A-7 TO A-8 STRM-A-7 41 46 173 6 0 005 42 0 0 013 18 62 1 56 71 22 26 1 34 9 55 87 52 57 42 78 42 15 10 91 8 48 6 23 A-8 TO A-9 STRM-A-8 40 49 102 7 0 005 42 0 0 013 18 65 1 51 70 89 26 3 35 0 52 57 48 65 41 81 41 49 8 58 5 17 6 21 A-9 TO A-10 STRM-A-9 39 88 64 6 0 005 42 0 0 013 18 55 1 21 71 91 25 8 34 7 48 65 43 64 41 20 40 76 5 27 0 59 6 27 Al -1 TO Al -2 STRM-A1-1 48 67 39 8 0 005 18 0 0 013 0 00 0 74 7 43 0 0 (N/A) 54 01 53 34 49 06 49 06 3 84 3 52 0 00 Al -2 TO A1-3 STRM-A1-2 48 22 119 8 0 005 18 0 0 013 3 36 0 70 7 43 45 3 47 2 53 34 53 34 48 93 48 32 3 62 4 22 4 10 Al -3 TO A1-4 STRM-A1-3 47 12 120 2 0 005 24 0 0 013 5 35 1 38 15 98 33 4 39 8 53 34 53 34 47 94 47 90 4 22 4 82 4 58 A1-4 TO A-5 STRM-A1-4 46 42 158 3 0 005 24 0 0 013 11 38 1 21 15 98 71 2 62 3 53 34 56 92 47 67 46 84 4 92 9 29 5 52 A2-1 TO A-6 STRM-A2-1 50 15 501 1 0 005 18 0 0 013 2 25 0 57 7 42 30 3 37 8 55 39 57 74 50 72 48 22 3 74 8 59 3 68 A2 -RD STRM-A2-RD1 51 00 5 0 0 036 10 0 0 013 2 25 0 53 4 14 54 5 52 6 51 90 55 39 51 67 51 35 0 07 3 73 7 75 A3-1 TO A3-9 STRM-A3-1 49 92 333 7 0 005 18 0 0 013 1 57 0 48 7 41 21 2 31 3 55 26 55 64 50 39 48 74 3 84 5 88 3 33 A3-9 TO A4-7 STRM-A3-9 48 16 88 1 0 005 18 0 0 013 1 45 0 45 7 42 19 5 29 9 55 64 54 18 48 61 48 17 5 98 4 96 3 26 A3 RD STRM-A3-RD1 51 00 5 0 0 016 6 0 0 013 1 57 0 50 0 71 221 4 (N/A) 51 54 55 26 51 81 51 42 0 04 3 84 8 01 A4-1 TO A4-3 STRM-A4-1 45 27 54 4 0 005 6 0 0 013 0 43 0 33 0 39 108 2 (N/A) 54 33 53 50 45 71 45 33 8 56 8 00 2 17 A4-3 TO A4-5 STRM-A4-3 44 00 48 0 0 005 18 0 0 013 1 45 0 84 7 43 19 6 30 0 53 50 53 50 44 60 44 60 8 00 8 24 3 26 A4-5 TO A4-7 STRM-A4-5 43 76 36 7 0 005 18 0 0 013 3 33 0 70 7 36 45 2 47 2 53 50 54 18 44 47 44 28 8 24 9 10 4 06 A4-7 TO A-7 STRM-A4-7 43 08 153 0 0 005 24 0 0 013 4 54 0 96 16 05 28 3 36 4 54 18 55 87 43 83 43 27 9 10 11 56 4 39 A4 -RD STRM-A4-RD1 45 75 31 9 0 015 6 0 0 013 0 43 0 44 0 69 62 4 57 2 46 29 54 33 46 08 45 71 0 04 8 56 3 69 A5-1 TO A5-2 STRM-A5-1 52 88 155 2 0 005 18 0 0 013 1 31 0 59 7 40 17 7 28 5 57 85 58 10 53 31 52 70 3 47 4 49 3 15 A5-2 TO A5-3 STRM-A5-2 52 01 114 4 0 005 18 0 0 013 2 40 0 59 7 43 32 3 39 1 58 10 57 33 52 59 52 02 4 60 4 40 3 75 A5-3 TO A-7 STRM-A5-3 50 94 108 0 0 005 24 0 0 013 4 78 0 75 16 00 29 8 37 5 57 33 55 87 51 71 51 15 4 39 3 47 4 45 A6-1 TO A-8 STRM-A6-1 44 92 292 1 0 005 12 0 0 013 0 43 0 27 2 52 16 9 27 8 53 54 52 57 45 20 43 73 7 62 8 11 2 39 A6 -RD STRM A6-RD1 45 75 21 7 0 015 6 0 0 013 0 43 0 29 0 69 62 4 57 2 46 29 53 54 46 08 45 71 0 04 7 62 3 69 B-1 TO B-2 STRM-B-1 47 51 119 7 0 005 24 0 0 013 3 39 0 83 16 01 21 1 31 2 52 97 53 50 48 15 47 74 3 46 4 59 4 04 B-2 TO B-3 STRM-B-2 46 81 171 6 0 005 24 0 0 013 4 99 0 77 16 02 31 1 38 3 53 50 53 52 47 60 46 72 4 69 5 57 4 50 B-3 TO B-4 STRM-B-3 45 33 230 5 0 005 30 0 0 013 7 61 1 03 28 97 26 3 35 0 53 52 52 81 46 25 45 21 5 69 6 13 4 97 B-4 TO B-5 STRM-B-4 43 68 99 0 0 005 36 0 0 013 14 49 1 50 47 40 30 6 37 9 52 81 53 49 44 89 44 68 6 13 7 31 5 89 B-5 TO B-6 STRM-B-5 43 08 120 0 0 005 36 0 0 013 15 64 1 55 47 17 33 2 39 6 53 49 53 51 44 34 44 03 7 41 8 03 5 99 B-6 TO B-7 STRM-B 6 42 38 391 1 0 005 36 0 0 013 16 59 1 76 47 10 35 2 41 0 53 51 47 50 43 68 42 19 8 13 4 07 6 08 B-7 TO B-8 STRM-B-7 40 33 240 7 0 005 36 0 0 013 19 53 1 61 47 28 41 3 44 8 47 50 44 19 41 75 40 73 4 17 2 07 6 37 B 8 TO B-9 STRM-B-8 38 62 219 3 0 005 42 0 0 013 28 96 1 55 71 25 40 6 44 4 44 19 42 12 40 28 39 07 2 07 1 10 7 02 B1-1 TO B1-2 STRM-B1-1 48 88 39 9 0 005 18 0 0 013 0 00 0 75 7 43 0 0 (N/A) 54 02 53 34 49 28 49 28 3 64 3 31 0 00 B1-2 TO B1-3 STRM-B1-2 48 43 119 7 0 005 18 0 0 013 3 45 0 71 7 44 46 4 47 9 53 34 53 34 49 15 48 54 3 41 4 01 4 13 096441004_STRM stsw 8/21/2018 Bentley Systems Inc Haestad Methods Solution Center 27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown CT 06795 USA +1 203 755 1666 Bentley StormCAD CONNECT Edition [10 01 01 04] Page 1 of 2 Mead Industrial Subdivision FlexTable: Conduit Table Active Scenario: 5 YR Label Start Node, _ _ ,, Invert (Start) ,, (ft) Length (Scaled) (ft) Slope (Calculated) (ft/ft) ' , Diameter (in)' -' Manning's n Flow (cfs) Depth (Out) (ft) , - Capacity (Full Flow) (cfs) _ Flow / Capacity t (Design) ^(%) ., Depth (Normal) / Rise ^- (%) Elevation Ground (Start) (ft) Elevation ' ' Ground (Stop) .(ft)-,- Hydraulic Grade Line , (In) ` (ft) - Hydraulic , Grade Line (Out) (ft) Cover (Start) ,(ft) - Cover, (Stop) (ft) Velocity (ft/s) - B1-3 TO B-4 STRM-B1-3 47 33 173 3 0 005 24 0 0 013 6 18 0 86 15 94 38 8 43 2 53 34 52 81 48 21 47 33 4 01 4 34 4 75 B2-1 TO B-5 STRM-B2-1 50 16 344 0 0 005 18 0 0 013 1 65 0 48 7 45 22 1 32 0 55 36 53 49 50 64 48 91 3 70 3 56 3 39 B2 -RD STRM-B2-RD1 51 00 4 9 0 036 10 0 0 013 1 65 0 44 4 14 39 9 43 9 51 90 55 36 51 58 51 26 0 07 3 70 7 16 B3-1 TO B-6 STRM-83-1 49 92 542 6 0 005 18 0 0 013 1 60 0 47 7 42 21 6 31 5 55 26 53 51 50 40 47 68 3 84 4 80 3 35 B3 RD STRM-B3-RD1 51 00 5 0 0 016 6 0 0 013 1 60 0 50 0 71 225 4 (N/A) 51 54 55 26 51 83 51 42 0 04 3 84 8 15 B4-1 TO B-7 STRM-B4-1 41 56 75 9 0 005 24 0 0 013 4 24 1 00 16 00 26 5 35 1 46 98 47 50 42 29 42 19 3 42 4 32 4 30 B5-1 TO B-8 STRM-B5-1 40 43 30 8 0 005 24 0 0 013 12 66 1 28 16 00 79 2 67 1 46 38 44 19 41 77 41 56 3 95 1 92 5 65 C-1 TO C-2 STRM-C-1 33 33 287 6 0 005 30 0 0 013 0 00 0 00 29 00 0 0 (N/A) 36 63 35 19 33 33 31 90 0 79 0 79 0 00 096441004_STRM stsw Bentley Systems Inc Haestad Methods Solution Center 8/21/2018 27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown CT 06795 USA +1 203 755 1666 Bentley StormCAD CONNECT Edition [10 01 01 04] Page 2 of 2 Mead Industrial Subdivision Profile Report Engineering Profile - STRM-A-1 to STRM-A-10 (096441004 _ STRM.stsw) Active Scenario: 5 YR MIOU 55 00 50 00 45 00 C 00 350.0 -0.50 STT4M A-1 Ro, 53 4011 nv*. 46 33 U Inv*. MCA*. 48 741 HI3gO A) 48 US A. TO Ae 112 1 A It 0.008 AA1 M. In Conn* STRM'A•2 Rim 53 751 rimer 47 331 Hi,Lan.) 48181 MOt(Oun 4805• A•2 TO A-3: 1402* .0.0051141 AL 0 1Canons STRM-A-3 Rot 54 Oil �1.tiert 48248 HG.M) 47 71! A-3TQA.1 i581 P 00c6 'u41 24 ti In Cawley ST ;44-4-4 RIM 57061 -mitrt 45 25 R 1/ • M) 46 321 n,1.rHC,c.1Ou0 18 091 ST F4A4-48 Rim. 5642 /klwrt 49111 / HGL(1A) 46 :51 HGL(04 4g t01 A4 TO A 6. 131 811 100064+11 3011 In scats 11,676 Al 110,3 A 0.006 011 0 Comae* STRM•A•6 Atm 57 7411 11nv 1t 42 31i 1 J HCd.(In) 43 71* HC4.(Ou) 43 471 A•8 TO A•7: 2G8 II *0005 AA •38 0 In Contras STR0.4MA-7 km 55 871 rimer 40821 7 HGU01) 432711 HG6(GuO < 781 A7 T0A•& 01:ea * 0.00844 Conte STRIA -A-8 Run 52 37* Watt *.781 Hrdjwn) 4:1511 HGL(Out) 41 81 A•STOAA 102. A /0.0068 42 11 Calmly 3TRM-A-9 Rim 48 658 rover 39 041 / HG1j1n) 41 49 It / HG1.(Ouf 41201 ASTOA-10 648• 0 0061U) 0 42 in Cortege STRM•A-10 m 43641 Iixvrt 38 7: 1 0.00 0•x0 1.0c 1.50 2.00 2.50 roo 1•50 4.00 4.50 a•uc 5.50 8.00 8'50 7.00 7.51 0.00 F•5G 9.00 1.50 ,0.00 10.50 11.00 11.50 12.00 12.50 13.00 096441004_STRM.stsw 8/21/2018 Stem MI Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center 27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203- 755-1666 Bentley StormCAD CONNECT Edition [10.01.01.04] Page 1 of 1 Mead Industrial Subdivision Profile Report Engineering Profile - STRM-A1-1 to STRM-A-5 (096441004 _ STRM.stsw) Active Scenario: 5 YR 60.00 55.00 50.00 45.00 40.00 STRM-A1-1 Rim: 54.01 ft Invert: 48.52 ft HGL(In): 49.06 ft HGL(Out): 49.06 ft STRM-A1-2 Rim: 53.34 ft /Invert: 47.83 ft HGL(In): 49.06 ft HC.iL(Out): 48.93 ft ST RM-A1-3 Rim: 53.34 ft /Invert: 47.03 ft HGL(In): 48.09 ft HGL(Out): 47.94 ft A1-1 TO Al -2: 70.0 ft @ 0.005 ft/ft 18.0 in Concrete Al -2 TO Al -3. 119.8 ft 0.005 ft/ft 18.0 in Concrete A1-3 TO A1-4: 120.2 ft @ 0.005 ft/ft 24.0 in Concrete STRM-A1-4 Rim: 53.34 ft Invert: 45.93 ft HGL(In): 47.90 ft HGL(Outt416-3 ft 41-4 TO A-5: 158.3 ft @ 0.005 ft/ft 24.0 in Concrete STRM-A-5 Rim: 56.92 ft Invert: 43.11 ft HGL(In): 45.55 ft HGL(Out): 45.16 ft -0+50 096441004_ST RM.stsw 8/21/2018 0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 Station (ft) 2+50 3+00 Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center 27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203- 755-1666 3+50 4+00 4+50 5+00 Bentley StormCAD CONNECT Edition [10.01.01.04) Page 1 of 1 Mead Industrial Subdivision Profile Report Engineering Profile - STRM-A2-RD1 to STRM-A-6 (096441004STRM.stsw) Active Scenario: 5 YR r C O W 60.00 55.00 50.00 45.00 40.00 -0+50 096441004_STRM.stsw 8/21/2018 -5)Q O 'O 0 -Oj cp 0+00 STRM-A2-RD1 Rim: 51.90 ft Invert: 51.00 tt HGL(In): 51.85 ft HGL(Out): 51.67 ft STRM-A2-1 Invert: 50.16 ft HGL(In): 50.72 ft HGL(Out): 50.72 ft 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 A2-1 TO A-6: 501.0 ft 0.005 ft/ft 18.1) in Concrete 2+50 Station (ft) 3+00 Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center 27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203- 755-1666 3+50 4+00 4+50 STRM-A-6 Rim: 57.74 ft Invert: 42.36 ft HGL(In): 44.36 ft HGL(Out): 44.11 ft 1 J 5+00 5+50 Bentley StormCAD CONNECT Edition [ 10.01.01.04] Page 1of1 Mead Industrial Subdivision Profile Report Engineering Profile - STRM-A3-RD1 to STRM-A-7 (096441004STRM.stsw) Active Scenario: 5 YR 60.00 5500 50.00 45.00 40.00 -0+50 096441004_ STRM.stsw 8/21/2018 -10 lb ChoNS. STRM-A3-RD1 Rim 51.54 ft Invert: 51,00 ft HGL(In): 52.04 ft HGL(Out): 51.54 ft STRM-A3-1 Invert: 49.93 ft ,r HGL(In): 50.39 ft '` HGL(Out): 50.39 ft 0+00 0+50 1+00 A3-1 TO A3-9: 334.0 ft @0005ft/ft 18.0 rn Concrete 1+50 2+00 2+50 Station (ft) 3+00 STRM-A3-9 Rim: 55.64 ft -Invert: 47.76 ft HGL(In): 48.74 ft HGL(Out) 48.61 ft A3-9 TO A4-7: 88 1 ft @ 0.005 ft/ft 18.0 in Concrete 3+50 4+00 Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center 27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203- 755-1666 STRM-A4-7 Rim: 54.18 ft Invert: 43.08 ft ! HGL(In): 44 11 ft / HGL(Out): 43.83 ft A 4+50 A4-7 TO A-7: 153.0 ft @0005ft/ft 24.0 in Concrete 5+00 5+50 STRM-A-7 Rim 55.87 ft Invert: 40.82 ft /HGL(In): 43.27 ft HGL(Out): 42.78 ft 6+00 Bentley StormCAD CONNECT Edition [10.01.01.04] Page 1 of 1 Mead Industrial Subdivision Profile Report Engineering Profile - STRM-A4-RD1 to STRM-A4-7 (096441004 STRM.stsw) Active Scenario: 5 YR STRM-A4-3 Rim: 53.50 ft Invert: 44.00 ft HGL(In): 44.64 ft STRM-A4-5 HGL(Out): 44.60 ft Rim: 53.50 ft ,- Invert: 43.76 ft j✓ HGL(In): 44.60 ft HGL(Out): 44.47 ft 55.00 50.00 45.00 40.00 096441004_STRM.stsw 8/21/2018 STRM-A4-RD1 Rim 46.29 ft Invert: 45.75 ft H¢L(In): 46.16 ft 7GL(Out) 46.08 ft STRM-A4-1 Invert: 44.77 ft � HGL(In): 45.71 ft j HGL(Out): 45.71 A4 -RD: 31.9 h - n0om0,.. @ 15 f i STRM-A4-7 Rim: 54.18 ft '-Invert: 43.08 ft HGL(In): 44.11 ft HGL(Out): 43.83 ft 6.0 in P�hVC A4-1 TO A4-3: 55.0 Lccr� 0.005 ft/ft Aft4-3 TO A4-5: 48.0 ft A4-5 TCTg4.7: 36.7 ft 6.0 in Concrete @ 0.005 ft/ft @ 0.005 ft/ft 18.0 in Concrete 18.0 in Concrete -0+50 0+00 0+50 Station (ft) 1+00 1+50 Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center 27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203- 755-1666 2+00 Bentley StormCAD CONNECT Edition [10.01.01.041 Page 1 of 1 Mead Industrial Subdivision Profile Report Engineering Profile - STRM-A5-1 to STRM-A-7 (096441004 STRM.stsw) Active Scenario: 5 YR 60.00 55.00 50.00 45.00 40.00 -0+50 096441004_STRM.stsw 8/21/2018 STRM-A5-1 Rim: 57.85 ft Invert: 52.88 ft HGL(In): 53.31 ft HGL(Out): 53.31 ft A5-1 TO A5-2: 155.2 ft @ 0.005 ft/ft 18.0 in Concrete 0+00 STRM-A5-2 Rim: 58.10 ft /Invert: 52.01 ft HGL(In): 52.70 ft HGL(Out): 52.59 ft 1 A5-2 TO A5-3: 114.4 ft ©0.005ft/ft 18.0 0+50 1+00 STRM-A5-3 Rim: 57.33 ft 7 -Invert: 50.77 ft HGL(In): 51.88 ft HGL(Out): 51.71 ft in Concrete 1+50 Station (ft) 2+00 A5-3 TO A-7: 108.0 ft @ 0.005 ft/ft 24.0 in Concrete 2+50 Bentley Systems. Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center 27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203- 755-1666 A STRM-A-7 Rim: 55.87 ft Invert: 40.82 ft HGL(In): 43.27 ft HGL(Out): 42.78 ft N 3+00 3+50 4+00 Bentley StormCAD CONNECT Edition [10.01.01.04] Page 1of1 Mead Industrial Subdivision Profile Report Engineering Profile - STRM-A6-RD1 to STRM-A-8 (096441004_STRM.stsw) Active Scenario: 5 YR 0 Cu w 55.00 50.00 45.00 40.00 35.00 096441004_STRM.stsw 8/21/2018 rSTRM-A6-RD1 Rim: 46.29 ft Invert: 45.75 ft HGL(In): 46.16 ft HGL(Out): 46.08 ft A6 -RD: 21 @0.015 ft/ft h 6.0 in PVC -0+50 STRM-A6-1 Invert: 44.93 ft HGL(In): 45.20 ft HGL(Out): 45.20 ft 0+00 0+50 A6-1 TO A-8: 292.0 ft @ 0.005 ft/ft 12.0 in Concrete 1+00 1+50 2+00 Station (ft) Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center 27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203- 755-1666 2+50 N STRM-A-8 Rim: 52.57 ft Invert: 39.76 ft HGL(In): 42.15 ft HGL(Out): 41.81 ft LJ 3+00 3+50 Bentley StormCAD CONNECT Edition [10.01.01.041 Page 1 of 1 Mead l£-:dustrial Subdivision Profile Report Engineering Profile - STRM-S-1 to STRM-B-9 (096441004_STRM.stsw) Active Scenario: 5 YR — 1. 096441004_STRM stsw 8/21/2018 - 301331.333 MAW. 3303100 I I 31-10,43 14.0131.1.030 H -- 'At= 1001 IA40 0.30 II. WA IWO 0.10 Bentley Systems, Inc Haestad Methods Solution Center 27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown CT 06795 USA +1-203- 755-1666 E 14.13 1.0 1.0 ISSO Bentley StormCAD CONNECT Edition [10 01 01 04] Page 1 of 1 Mead Industrial Subdivision Profile Report Engineering Profile - STRM-B1-1 to STRM-B-4 (096441004 STRM.stsw) Active Scenario: 5 YR 4-0 C 0 CD w 55.00 50.00 45.00 40.00 STRM-B1-1 Rim: 54.02 ft (-Invert: 48.73 ft / HGL(In): 49.28 ft HGL(Out). 49.28 ft B1-1 TO B1-2: 70.0 ft © 0.005 ft/ft 18.0 in Concrete STRM-B1-2 Rim: 53.34 ft Invert: 48.03 ft HGL(In): 49.28 ft HGL(Out): 49.15 ft B1-2 TO B1-3: 119.7 ft Kb 0.005 ft/ft 18.0 in Concrete STRM-B1-3 Rim: 53.34 ft Invert: 47.33 ft if HGL(In): 48.38 ft HGL(Out): 48.21 ft B1-3 TO 8-4: 173.3 ft @ 0.005 ft/ft 24:0 in Concrete I ti Amplb STRM-B-4 Rim: 52.81 ft �C Invert: 43.16 ft HGL(In): 45.21 ft HGL(Out): 44.89 ft -0+50 096441004_STRM.stsw 8/21/2018 0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 Station (ft) 2+00 2+50 3+00 Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center 27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203- 755-1666 3+50 4+00 Bentley StormCAD CONNECT Edition [ 10.01.01.04] Page 1 of 1 Mead Industrial Subdivision Profile Report Engineering Profile - STRM-B2-RD1 to STRM-B-5 (09644100&STRM.stsw) Active Scenario: 5 YR 60.00 0 (13 w 55.00 50.00 45.00 40.00 STRM-B2-RD1 Rim: 51.90 ft r Invert: 51.00 ft HGL(In): 51.71 ft / HGL(Out): 51.58 ft STRM-B2-1 Invert: 50.16 ft HGL(In): 50.64 ft HGL(Out): 50.64 ft 82-1 TO 8-5: 344.0 ft © 0.005 18.0 in Concrete STRM-B-5 Rim: 53.49 ft Invert: 42.65 ft HGL(In): 44.68 ft HGL(Out): 44.34 ft -0+50 096441004_STRM.stsw 8/21/2018 0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 Station (ft) 2+00 Bentley Systems. Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center 27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203- 755-1666 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 Bentley Storm CAD CONNECT Edition [10.01.01.04] Page 1 of 1 Mead Industrial Subdivision Profile Report Engineering Profile - STRM-B3-RD1 to STRM-B-6 (096441004 _ STRM.stsw) Active Scenario: 5 YR 60.00 55.00 49 50.00 45.00 40.00 -0+50 096441004_ STRM.stsw 8/21/2018 0+00 STRM-B3-RD1 Rim: 51 54 ft invert: 51.00 ft HGL(In): 52.06 ft f HGL(Out): 51.54 ft STRM-B3-1 Invert: 49.93 ft /HGL(In): 50.40 ft HGL(Out): 50.40 ft 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 83-1 TO 8-6: 543.0 n Ca) 0.005 ft/ft 18.0 in Concrete 2+50 Station (ft) 3+00 3+50 Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center 27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203- 755-1666 4+00 4+50 5+00 STRM-B-6 Rim: 53.51 ft - Invert: 42.01 ft HGL(In): 44.03 ft HGL(0ut): 43.68 ft N 5+50 6+00 Bentley StormCAD CONNECT Edition [10.01.01.04] Page 1 of 1 Mead Industrial Subdivision Profile Report Engineering Profile - STRM-B4-1 to STRM-B-7 (096441004 STRM.stsw) Active Scenario: 5 YR IA L C 0 co > a) w 096441004_STRM.stsw 8/21/2018 50.00 45.00 40.00 STRM-B4-1 Rim: 46.98 ft Invert: 41.56 ft HGL(In): 42.42 ft HGL(Out): 42.29 ft B4-1 TO B-7: 0.005 ft/ft 24.0 in Concrete ft -0+50 0+00 0+50 Station (ft) Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center 27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203- 755-1666 STRM-B-7 Rim: 47.50 ft Invert: 40.05 ft HGL(In): 42.19 ft HGL(Out): 41.75 ft 1+00 Bentley StormCAD CONNECT Edition [10.01.01.04] Page 1 of 1 Mead Industrial Subdivision Profile Report Engineering Profile - STRM-B5-1 to STRM-B-8 (096441004 _ STRM.stsw) Active Scenario: 5 YR STRM-B5-1 Rim: 46.38 ft Invert: 40.43 ft HGL(In): 42.02 ft HGL(Out): 41.77 ft SrRM-B-8 Rim: 44.19 ft Invert: 38.30 ft HGL(In): 40.73 ft HGL(Out): 40.28 ft I C O Co a) w 096441004_STRM.stsw 8/21/2018 50.00 45.00 40.00 35.00 6-8: B5-1 TO 30.8 ft @ 0.005 ft/ft 24.0 in Concrete N -0+50 0+00 0+50 Station (ft) Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center 27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203- 755-1666 Bentley StormCAD CONNECT Edition [ 10.01.01.04] Page 1 of 1 Mead industrial Subdivision F exTable: Conduit Table Active Scenario: 100 YR Label , Start Node Invert (Start) (ft) Length (Scaled) (ft) Slope (Calculated) (ft/ft) Diameter (in) Manning's n Flow (cfs) Depth (Out) (ft) Capacity (Full Flow) (cfs) Flow / Capacity (Design) (%) Depth (Normal) / Rise (%) Elevation Ground (Start) '' (ft) Elevation Ground (Stop) , (ft) Hydraulic Grade Line (In) - (ft) Hydraulic Grade Line , (Out) (ft) Cover (Start) , (ft) _ Cover (Stop) (ft) _ Velocity , (ft/s) _ A-1 TO A-2 STRM-A-1 48 00 122 1 0 005 24 0 0 013 11 01 5 04 15 99 68 9 61 0 53 40 53 75 52 72 52 43 3 40 4 36 3 51 A-2 TO A-3 STRM-A-2 47 29 120 2 0 005 24 0 0 013 15 17 5 02 15 98 94 9 77 8 53 75 54 09 52 25 51 71 4 46 5 40 4 83 A-3 TO A-4 STRM-A-3 46 59 158 1 0 005 24 0 0 013 27 52 2 97 15 99 172 1 (N/A) 54 09 57 06 51 11 48 77 5 50 9 26 8 76 A-4 TO A-5 STRM A-4 45 30 231 5 0 005 30 0 0 013 22 28 3 69 29 03 76 7 65 7 57 06 56 92 48 52 47 83 9 26 10 28 4 54 A-5 TO A-6 STRM A-5 44 04 110 3 0 005 30 0 0 013 36 66 2 68 28 96 126 6 (N/A) 56 92 57 74 47 05 46 17 10 38 11 75 7 47 A-6 TO A-7 STRM-A-6 43 00 208 1 0 005 36 0 0 013 39 64 3 20 47 14 84 1 70 2 57 74 55 87 45 87 45 16 11 74 10 91 7 47 A-7 TO A-8 STRM-A-7 41 46 173 6 0 005 42 0 0 013 61 80 3 31 71 22 86 8 72 0 55 87 52 57 44 34 43 90 10 91 8 48 8 34 A-8 TO A-9 STRM-A-8 40 49 102 7 0 005 42 0 0 013 61 93 3 05 70 89 87 4 72 4 52 57 48 65 43 29 43 03 8 58 5 17 8 31 A 9 TO A-10 STRM-A-9 39 88 64 6 0 005 42 0 0 013 61 69 2 46 71 91 85 8 71 3 48 65 43 64 42 38 42 01 5 27 0 59 8 40 Al -1 TO A1-2 STRM-A1-1 48 67 39 8 0 005 18 0 0 013 0 00 4 63 7 43 0 0 (N/A) 54 01 53 34 52 95 52 95 3 84 3 52 0 00 A1-2 TO A1-3 STRM-A1-2 48 22 119 8 0 005 18 0 0 013 8 80 4 29 7 43 118 4 (N/A) 53 34 53 34 52 75 51 91 3 62 4 22 4 98 Al 3 TO A1-4 STRM-A1-3 47 12 120 2 0 005 24 0 0 013 14 04 4 77 15 98 87 9 72 7 53 34 53 34 51 76 51 29 4 22 4 82 4 47 A1-4 TO A-5 STRM-A1-4 46 42 158 3 0 005 24 0 0 013 29 87 2 20 15 98 186 9 (N/A) 53 34 56 92 50 59 47 83 4 92 9 29 9 51 A2-1 TO A-6 STRM A2-1 50 15 501 1 0 005 18 0 0 013 6 29 0 97 7 42 84 8 70 7 55 39 57 74 51 21 48 62 3 74 8 59 4 71 A2 -RD STRM-A2-RD1 51 00 5 0 0 036 10 0 0 013 6 29 0 83 4 14 152 1 (N/A) 51 90 55 39 52 07 51 65 0 07 3 73 11 54 A3-1 TO A3-9 STRM-A3-1 49 92 333 7 0 005 18 0 0 013 4 39 0 93 7 41 59 3 55 4 55 26 55 64 50 75 49 19 3 84 5 88 4 37 i A3-9 TO A4-7 STRM-A3-9 48 16 88 1 0 005 18 0 0 013 4 12 0 78 7 42 55 5 53 2 55 64 54 18 48 96 48 50 5 98 4 96 4 31 A3 -RD STRM-A3 RD1 51 00 5 0 0 016 6 0 0 013 4 39 0 50 0 71 618 4 (N/A) 51 54 55 26 54 48 51 42 0 04 3 84 22 36 A4-1 TO A4-3 STRM-A4-1 45 27 54 4 0 005 6 0 0 013 1 19 1 44 0 39 303 3 (N/A) 54 33 53 50 48 92 46 44 8 56 8 00 6 07 A4-3 TO A4-5 STRM-A4-3 44 00 48 0 0 005 18 0 0 013 3 94 2 57 7 43 53 0 51 8 53 50 53 50 46 40 46 33 8 00 8 24 2 23 A4-5 TO A4-7 STRM-A4-5 43 76 36 7 0 005 18 0 0 013 8 87 2 30 7 36 120 6 (N/A) 53 50 54 18 46 14 45 88 8 24 9 10 5 02 A4-7 TO A-7 STRM-A4-7 43 08 153 0 0 005 24 0 0 013 12 49 2 85 16 05 77 8 66 3 54 18 55 87 45 63 45 16 9 10 11 56 3 98 A4 -RD STRM-A4-RD1 45 75 31 9 0 015 6 0 0 013 1 20 3 65 0 69 174 3 (N/A) 46 29 54 33 50 38 48 92 0 04 8 56 6 10 A5-1 TO A5-2 STRM-A5-1 52 88 155 2 0 005 18 0 0 013 8 93 3 14 7 40 120 7 (N/A) 57 85 58 10 56 37 55 25 3 47 4 49 5 05 A5-2 TO A5-3 STRM-A5-2 52 01 114 4 0 005 18 0 0 013 12 60 1 77 7 43 169 7 (N/A) 58 10 57 33 54 85 53 20 4 60 4 40 7 13 A5-3 TO A-7 STRM-A5-3 50 94 108 0 0 005 24 0 0 013 18 88 1 56 16 00 118 0 (N/A) 57 33 55 87 52 86 51 96 4 39 3 47 6 01 A6-1 TO A-8 STRM-A6-1 44 92 292 1 0 005 12 0 0 013 1 19 0 46 2 52 47 4 48 4 53 54 52 57 45 40 43 92 7 62 8 11 3 17 A6 RD STRM-A6-RD1 45 75 21 7 0 015 6 0 0 013 1 20 0 49 0 69 174 3 (N/A) 46 29 53 54 46 91 45 91 0 04 7 62 6 10 B-1 TO B-2 STRM-B-1 47 51 119 7 0 005 24 0 0 013 10 70 3 90 16 01 66 8 59 8 52 97 53 50 51 08 50 81 3 46 4 59 3 40 8-2 TO B-3 STRM-B-2 46 81 171 6 0 005 24 0 0 013 15 24 3 90 16 02 95 2 77 9 53 50 53 52 50 63 49 85 4 69 5 57 4 85 B 3 TO B-4 STRM-B-3 45 33 230 5 0 005 30 0 0 013 23 53 4 62 28 97 81 2 68 4 53 52 52 81 49 56 48 80 5 69 6 13 4 79 B 4 TO B-5 STRM-B-4 43 68 99 0 0 005 36 0 0 013 41 69 4 86 47 40 88 0 72 8 52 81 53 49 48 42 48 04 6 13 7 31 5 90 B 5 TO B-6 STRM-B-5 43 08 120 0 0 005 36 0 0 013 44 88 4 58 47 17 95 1 77 9 53 49 53 51 47 60 47 06 7 41 8 03 6 35 B-6 TO 8-7 STRM-B 6 42 38 391 1 0 005 36 0 0 013 47 56 4 14 47 10 101 0 82 9 53 51 47 50 46 56 44 57 8 13 4 07 6 73 B-7 TO B 8 STRM-B-7 40 33 240 7 0 005 36 0 0 013 55 62 3 01 47 28 117 6 (N/A) 47 50 44 19 43 81 42 13 4 17 2 07 7 87 B-8 TO B 9 STRM-B-8 38 62 219 3 0 005 42 0 0 013 68 07 2 59 71 25 95 5 78 2 44 19 42 12 41 36 40 11 2 07 1 10 8 43 B1-1 TO 81-2 STRM-B1-1 48 88 39 9 0 005 18 0 0 013 0 00 2 46 7 43 0 0 (N/A) 54 02 53 34 50 99 50 99 3 64 3 31 0 00 Bl-2 TO B1-3 STRM-B1-2 48 43 119 7 0 005 18 0 0 013 9 03 2 07 7 44 121 5 (N/A) 53 34 53 34 50 79 49 90 3 41 4 01 5 11 096441004_STRM stsw 8/21/2018 Bentley Systems Inc Haestad Methods Solution Center 27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown CT 06795 USA +1 203 755 1666 Bentley StormCAD CONNECT Edition 110 01 01 04] Page 1 of 2 Mead Industrial Subdivision FlexTable: Conduit Table Active Scenario: 100 YR Label Start Node Invert .' (Start) (ft) s %. Length (Scaled) (ft) Slope_ (Calculated) (ft/ft) - Diameter ' (in) Manning's n Flow (cfs)- - , Depth (Out) (ft) Capacity (Full Flow) (cfs) - , Flow / Capacity (Design) (%) Depth (Normal) / Rise (%) - Elevation Ground (Start) ' (ft) Elevation Ground (Stop) (ft) Hydraulic Grade Line (In) (ft) Hydraulic Grade Line (Out) - (ft) Cover (Start) (ft) - Cover (Stop) (ft) - Velocity (ft/s) - B1-3 TO B-4 STRM-B1-3 47 33 173 3 0 005 24 0 0 013 16 23 2 33 15 94 101 8 83 7 53 34 52 81 49 70 48 80 4 01 4 34 5 17 B2-1 TO B-5 STRM-B2-1 50 16 344 0 0 005 18 0 0 013 4 61 0 82 7 45 61 9 56 9 55 36 53 49 51 01 49 25 3 70 3 56 4 44 B2 -RD STRM-B2-RD1 51 00 4 9 0 036 10 0 0 013 4 61 0 82 4 14 111 4 (N/A) 51 90 55 36 51 87 51 64 0 07 3 70 8 45 B3-1 TO B 6 STRM-83-1 49 92 542 6 0 005 18 0 0 013 4 47 0 81 7 42 60 2 56 0 55 26 53 51 50 76 48 02 3 84 4 80 4 39 B3 -RD STRM-B3-RD1 51 00 5 0 0 016 6 0 0 013 4 47 0 50 0 71 629 6 (N/A) 51 54 55 26 54 60 5142 0 04 3 84 22 77 B4-1 TO B-7 STRM-B4-1 41 56 75 9 0 005 24 0 0 013 11 52 3 39 16 00 72 0 62 8 46 98 47 50 44 77 44 57 3 42 4 32 3 67 B5-1 TO B 8 STRM-B5-1 40 43 30 8 0 005 24 0 0 013 17 12 1 86 16 00 107 0 91 0 46 38 44 19 42 28 42 13 3 95 1 92 5 70 C-1 TO C-2 STRM-C-1 33 33 287 6 0 005 30 0 0 013 0 00 0 00 29 00 0 0 (N/A) 36 63 35 19 33 33 31 90 0 79 0 79 0 00 096441004_STRM stsw Bentley Systems Inc Haestad Methods Solution Center 8/2112018 27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown CT 06795 USA .1 203 755 1666 Bentley StormCAD CONNECT Edition [10 01 01 04] Page 2 of 2 Mead Industrial Subdivision Profile Report Engineering Profile - STRM-A-1 to STRM-A-10 (STRM) (096441004 _ STRM-stsw) Active Scenario: 100 YR r_ IA) 60 00 55 00 5000 4 00 4f 00 u•S STRM*I Ran 53 40 0 fast N 13 /'lGL01. SZ 81 k 'G4C0 s;720 a Al - Ton. 132 11 00.005411 44 0 in Gnaw 040( 1.SL 096441004_ STRM.stsw 8/21/2018 STRIA -Al Ran 53750 -amen 47 3) IHGt4kw 52 43 n HGLI0uq' 52 2s 1 _ A•7 TOA•J 14010 �0 .�� 24 mCgnpp STRIkA-3 km 54 0910 a" *vw �/M 1711 _- 44. II 1O I 24.0 in Cattrte 1•Jd 1450 ,.u0 2.50 A00 1.50 STPI4A-4 Rim 5706N Invert 45 25 0 / HGLQn) 48 77n HGI.(.'Mu) 48 57 n STRM.A-S Rim 66 92k n4311$ HQUIn) 47 83 It HGUCA+O 47 0510 44 006001 AO In Cabals IMO A.5 T044: TT0;6 3 0039 Ira 0 catnap STRM Ai Pm 57 74 • hart. C )6 It HGLOn) 46 17 0 HGUOut) 15 87 A41 TO A -7t J0S 1 ♦ 3000 a CaM>AN STRM A-7 Rim 55 8' ■ mad 40 WI HG1(InI K 1611 Al ToA4Ill,* 470.003 ILO 410 in Cobble STRM-A-8 Ran 6:57 it sat 3$ 760 HGLQn) 43 90 t HGt4 *m 4.1 Z9 A -Mall: 002 71 �000'sms 42 a Cowan ST -9 Ran 48 65 0 rarer 1904 II HGL n) 43 0311 HG110uq C30 A070/4.10 seal 0.COS It* 42-0 in Gtnunte STR*A-10 (3TTu Rom 43641 Ir alt 31720 4•Iu 4.50 5.00 S•50 6.00 6.50 7.00 1.50 0400 8.50 Salk 9.50 10.01 I0•s0 11.00 11.50 12.00 12.50 11.Ihl Salon A) Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center 27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203- 755-1666 Bentley StormCAD CONNECT Edition [10.01.01.04] Page 1of1 Mead Industrial Subdivision Profile Report Engineering Profile - STRM-A1-1 to STRM-A-5 (096441004 STRM.stsw) Active Scenario: 100 YR r a) 60.00 55.00 50.00 45.00 40.00 T STRM-A1-1 Rim: 54.01 ft Invert: 48.52 ft HGL(In): 52.95 ft HGL(Out): 52.95 ft Al -1 TO A1-2: 70.0 ft @ 0.005 ft/ft 18.0 in Concrete SIRM-A1-2 Rim: 53.34 ft Invert: 47.83 ft HGL(In): 52.95 tt HGL(Out): 52.75 ft T SIHM-A1-3 Rim: 53.34 ft Invert: 47.03 ft / HGL(In): 51.91 ft HGL(Out): 51./6 ft Al -2 TO Al -3: 119.8 ft @ 0.005 ft/ft 18.0 in Concrete -0+50 096441004_STRM.stsw 8/21/2018 0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 Al -3 TO A1-4: 120.2 ft 0.005 ft/ft 24.0 in Concrete STRM-A1-4 Rim: 53.34 ft Invert: 45.93 ft HGL(In): 51.29 ft HGL(Out). 50.59 A1-4 TO A-5: 158 3 ft @ 0.005 ft/ft 24.0 in Concrete STRM-A-5 Rim: 56.92 ft Invert: 43.11 ft HGL(In): 47.83 ft HGL(Out): 47.05 ft 2+00 Station (ft) 2+50 3+00 Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center 27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203- 755-1666 3+50 4+00 4+50 5+00 Bentley StormCAD CONNECT Edition [ 10.01.01.04] Page 1of1 Mead Industrial Subdivision Profile Report Engineering Profile - STRM-A2-RD1 to STRM-A-6 (096441004 STRM.stsw) Active Scenario: 100 YR Elevation (ft) 60.00 55.00 50.00 45.00 40.00 -0+50 096441004_ STRM.stsw 8/21/2018 —/ T? 1O o O .0 La o ti 0+00 STRM-A2-RD1 Rim: 51.90 ft Invert: 51.00 ft HGL(In): 52.94 ft HGL(Out): 51.90 ft STRM-A2-1 Invert: 50.16 ft HGL(In): 51.21 ft HGL(Out): 51.21 ft 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 A2-1 TO A-6: 501.0 ft L1 0.005 ft/ft 18.0 in Concrete 2+50 Station (ft) 3+00 Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center 27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203- 755-1666 3+50 4+00 4+50 STRM-A-6 Rim: 57.74 ft Invert: 42.36 ft HGL(In): 46.17 ft / HGL(Out): 45.87 ft 5+00 5+50 Bentley Storm CAD CONNECT Edition [10.01.01.04] Page 1 of 1 Mead Industrial Subdivision Profile Report Engineering Profile - STRM-A3-RD1 to STRM-A-7 (096441004 _ STRM.stsw) Active Scenario: 100 YR 65 00 c 0 4- 0 a) w 60.00 55.00 50.00 45.00 4000 -0+50 096441004_STRM.stsw 8/21/2018 4' 'o ,•,s C STRM-A3-RD1 Rim 51.54 ft Invert 51.00 ft HGL(In): 55.43 ft L(Oitt): 51.54 ft / STRM-A3-1 Invert: 49.93 ft HGL(In): 50.75 ft HGL(Out): 50.75 ft A 0+00 0+50 1+00 A3-1 TO A3-9: 334.0 ft @ 0.005 ft/ft 18.0 in Concrete 1+50 2+00 2+50 Station (ft) 3+00 _� STRM-A3-9 Rim: 55.64 ft -Invert: 47.76 ft HGL(In): 49.19 ft HGL(Out) 48.96 ft A3-9 TO A4-7 88.1 ft @ 0.005 ft/ft 18.0 in Concrete 3+50 4+00 Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center 27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203- 755-1666 STRM-A4-7 Rim: 54.18 ft Invert: 43.08 ft HGL(In): 45.88 ft HGL(Out). 45.63 ft 4+50 A4-7 TO A-7 153 0 ft @ 0.005 ft/ft 24.0 in Concrete 5+00 5+50 STRM-A-7 Rim: 55.87 ft Invert: 40.82 ft HGL(In): 45.16 ft HGL(Out) 44 34 ft 6+00 Bentley StormCAD CONNECT Edition [10.01.01.04) Page 1 of Mead Industrial Subdivision Profile Report Engineering Profile - STRM-A4-RD1 to STRM-A4-7 (096441 004 STRM.stsw) 55.00 50.00 0 co C) w 45.00 40.00 096441004_STRM.stsw 8/21/2018 Active Scenario: 100 YR STRM-A4-3 Rim: 53.50 ft Invert: 44.00 ft HGL(In): 46.44 ft HGL(Out): 46.40 ft STRM-A4-RD1 Rim. 4629ft- -Invert: 45.75 ft H/L(In): 46.58 ft L(Out): 46.29 ft A4 -RD: 31. cc�00 0.015ft/ 6 � �/ ft O 1n PVC STRM-A4-1 Invert: 44.77 ft GL(In): 48.92 ft H •ut):48.92 A4-1 TO A4-3: 55.0 ft @ 0.005 ft/ft A4-3 TO A4-5: 48.0 ft A4-5 TO -g4_7: 36.7 ft 6.0 in Concrete @ 0.005 ft/ft @ 0.005 ft/ft 18.0 in Concrete 18.0 in Concrete STRM-A4-5 Rim: 53.50 ft Invert: 43.76 ft HGL(In): 46.33 ft HGL(Out): 46.14 ft STRM-A4-7 Rim: 54.18 ft Invert: 43.08 ft HGL(In): 45.88 ft HGL(Out): 45.63 ft -0+50 0+00 0+50 Station (ft) 1+00 Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center 27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203- 755-1666 1+50 2+00 Bentley StormCAD CONNECT Edition [10.01.01.04] Page 1 of 1 Mead Industrial Subdivision Profile Report Engineering Profile - STRM-A5-1 to STRM-A-7 (096441004_STRM.stsw) Active Scenario: 100 YR 4-0 •••J C 0 (13 a) w 60.00 55.00 50.00 45.00 40.00 S STRM-A5-1 Rim: 57.85 ft r Invert: 52.88 ft HGL(In): 56.37 ft HGL(Out): 56.37 ft A5-1 TO A5-2: 155.2 ft @ 0.005 ft/ft 18.0 in Concrete STRM-A5-2 Rim: 58.10 ft 1 -Invert: 52.01 ft HGL(In): 55.25 ft HGL(Out): 54.85 ft A5-2 TO A5-3: 114.4 ft @ 0.005 ft/ft 18.0 in Concrete S STRM-A5-3 Rim: 57.33 tt r Invert: 50.-7`7 ft / HGL(In): 53.20 ft HGL(Out): 52.86 ft A5-3 TO A-7: 108.0 ft @ 0.005 ft/ft 24.0 In Concrete STRM-A-7 Rim: 55.87 ft Invert: 40.82 ft HGL(In): 45.16 ft HGL(Out): 44.34 ft -0+50 096441004_STRM.stsw 8/21/2018 0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 Station (ft) 2+00 2+50 Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center 27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203- 755-1666 3+00 3+50 4+00 Bentley StormCAD CONNECT Edition [10.01.01.04] Page 1 of 1 Mead Industrial Subdivision Profile Report Engineering Profile - STRM-A6-RD1 to STRM-A-8 (096441004 STRM.stsw) Active Scenario: 100 YR C CD a) w 55.00 50.00 45.00 40.00 35.00 096441004_STRM.stsw 8/21/2018 STRWASPD1 Rim: 46.29 ft Invert: 45.75 ft HGL(In): 46.58 ft HGL(Out): 46.29 ft A6 -RD: 21 ft r0.015ft/0' PVC STRM-A6-1 _ Invert: 44.93 ft HGL(In): 45.40 ft HGL(Out): 45.40 ft A6-1 TO A-8: 292.0 ft @ 0.005 ft/ft 12.0 in Concrete I STRM-A-8 Rim: 52.57 ft Invert: 39.76 ft HGL(In): 43.90 ft HGL(Out): 43.29 ft -0+50 0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 Station (ft) Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center 27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203- 755-1666 2+50 3+00 3+50 Bentley StormCAD CONNECT Edition [10.01.01.04] Page 1 of 1 Mead Industrial Subdivision Profile Report Engineering Profile - STRM-B-1 to STRM-B-9 (096441004 STRM.stsw) Active Scenario: 100 YR fete 40 IL 41L El' w'$0 r.t ST/Wi1 Rom are r"SCIts May 411TH 11Q.0*t at as P110S: 110711 W GM 164 74 010 Gates 57R44414 4 Sk 5l 50* . twee ae at / ti at.t In at a clam SO OM 441CO1 Isle* 0040564 14 0.1 Cannot ST 1W 4L62 * /a.,a 453Js w. 311.E t 44 4{0 i •J 9044 230 it a 0000 Ott J00 a Cocos s T1M81 KutJsit w 414i * > M'�•1v 4134 / 11.4ua10 dais *TPUS& Riot Mae ►Welt 4144* 6ai Nan / 94.0M14140s 441044 1e 0005113 144 It) 04 1700* 000MMI 16 n envoi en44144 Piton 13411 Dna 4701* Hair) 4100* 11a101A1 flit ►010 7 oin j 000051.18 WO intonate S11sW7 few 4:501 rest c a• a31►v M 57 0 / •e10a4JSt* 1171004 am 71 E0005 lot 3a Mtwos 1TiWN 1►w et1et WWII *, MOLO*i .1135 143044 41 5a Si TO 6e 11*Js *000311, 42 0 a cac.46 STP9011.0 AJtaaO 42 12 'a* 13.411 1)X1 * 4.50 0.00 !1.60 Le. I.tO 2•.X 2.10 3.00 3.40 4.00 •.40 640 4x50 MO 6410 T.00 140 a.a4 s•SO 4403 r.60 13.00 1«O0 1140 1144 12400 13-4D IWO 13.10 1313 44.10 15.00 340 **03 096441004_STRM.stsw 8/21/2018 Sam 00 Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center 27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203- 755-1666 Bentley StormCAD CONNECT Edition [10.01.01.04] Page 1 of 1 Mead Industrial Subdivision Profile Report Engineering Profile - STRM-B1-1 to STRM-B-4 (096441004_STRM.stsw) Active Scenario: 100 YR 4J c 0 03 w 55.00 50.00 45.00 40.00 STRM-B1-1 Rim: 54.02 ft Invert: 48.73 ft sza_________ HGL(In): 50.99 ft HGL(Out): 50.99 ft -0+50 096441004_STRM.stsw 8/21/2018 81-1 TO B1-2: 70.0 ft @ 0.005 ft/ft 18.0 in Concrete STRM-B1-2 Rim: 53.34 ft Invert: 48.03 ft HGL(In): 50.99 ft HGL(Out): 50.79 ft 0+00 0+50 81-2 TO 81-3: 119.7 ft (Co 0.005 ft/ft 18.0 in Concrete STRM-B1-3 Rim: 53.34 ft Invert: 47.33 ft HGL(In): 49.90 ft / HGL(Out)• 49.70 ft t 1+00 1+50 Station (ft) 81-3 TO B-4. 173.3 ft @ 0.005 ft/ft 24.0 in Concrete 2+00 2+50 3+00 Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center 27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203- 755-1666 STRM-B-4 Rim: 52.81 ft Invert:_ 43.16 ft HGLOn): 48.80 ft HGL(Out): 48.42 ft a 3+50 4+00 Bentley StormCAD CONNECT Edition [10.01.01.04] Page 1 of 1 Mead Industrial Subdivision Profile Report Engineering Profile - STRM-B2-RD1 to STRM-B-5 (096441004 STRM.stsw) Active Scenario: 100 YR g 0 -715 w 60.00 55.00 50.00 45.00 40.00 -0+50 096441004_STRM.stsw 8/21/2018 STRM-B2-RD1 Rim: 51.90 ft Invert: 51.00 ft HGL(In): 52.42 ft HGL(Out): 51.87 ft STRM-B2-1 Invert: 50.16 ft HGL(In): 51.01 ft HGL(Out): 51.01 ft 0+00 82-1 TO 8-5. 344.0 ft © 0.005 ft/ft 18.0 in Concrete 0+50 1+00 1+50 Station (ft) 2+00 Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center 27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203- 755-1666 2+50 STRM-B-5 Rim: 53.49 ft ,-Invert: 42.65 ft HGLQInJ: 48.04 ft HGL(Out): 47.60 ft 3+00 3+50 4+00 Bentley StormCAD CONNECT Edition [10.01.01.04] Page 1of1 Mead Industrial Subdivision Profile Report Engineering Profile - STRM-B3-RD1 to STRM-B-6 (096441004_STRM.stsw) Active Scenario: 100 YR 65.00 60 00 c O 1 Cv m w 55.00 50.00 45.00 40.00 -0+50 096441004_STRM.stsw 8/21/2018 STRM-B3-RD1 Rim: 51 54 ft Invert: 51.00 ft HGL(In): 55.57 ft HGL(Out): 51.54 ft STRM-B3-1 Invert: 49.93 ft HGL(In): 50.76 ft HGL(Out): 50.76 ft 0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 B3-1 TO B-6. 543.0 ft © 0.005 ft/ft 18.0 in Concrete 2+50 Station (ft) 3+00 3+50 Bentley Systems. Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center 27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203- 755-1666 4+00 4+50 5+00 I STRM-B-6 Rim: 53.51 ft Invert: 42.01 ft HGL(In). 47.06 ft HGL(Out): 46.56 ft 5+50 6+00 Bentley StormCAD CONNECT Edition [10.01.01.041 Page 1 of 1 Mead Industrial Subdivision Profile Report Engineering Profile - STRM-B4-1 to STRM-B-7 (096441004 STRM.stsw) Active Scenario: 100 YR 50.00 4.1 45.00 40.00 096441004_STRM.stsw 8/21/2018 STRM-B4-1 Rim: 46.98 ft Invert: 41.56 ft HGL(In): 44.88 ft HGL(Out): 44.77 ft 64-11Q 8-2;f15gfi @ 0.005 ft/ft 24.0 in Concrete -0+50 0+00 Station (ft) 0+50 Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center 27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203- 755-1666 STRM-B-7 Rim: 47.50 ft Invert: 40.05 ft HGL(In): 44.57 ft HGL(Out): 43.81 ft 1+00 Bentley StormCAD CONNECT Edition [10.01.01.04) Page 1 of 1 096441004_STRM.stsw 8/21/2018 Mead Industrial Subdivision Profile Report Engineering Profile - STRM-B5-1 to STRM-B-8 (096441004_STRM.stsw) Active Scenario: 100 YR STRM-B5-1 Rim: 46.38 ft Invert: 40.43 ft HGL(In): 42.5 ft HGL(Out): 42.28 ft SjfRM-B-8 Rim: 44.19 ft Invert: 38.30 ft �HGL(In): 42.13 ft HGL(Out): 41.36 ft 50.00 45.00 40.00 35.00 B5-1 TO B-8: 30.8 ft @ 0.005 ft/ft 24.0 in Concrete -0+50 0+00 0+50 Station (ft) Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center 27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203- 755-1666 Bentley StormCAD CONNECT Edition [10.01.01.04] Page 1of1 Final Drainage Report Industrial Development — 1-25 & CR 34 APPENDIX D - WATER QUALITY AND DETENTION CALCULATIONS Kimley »Horn DETENTION BASIN STAGE -STORAGE TABLE BUILDER i°ETT wocv PERMANENT POOL UD-Detention, Version 3.07 (February 2017) Project: Mead -125 & R 3J Basin ID: EDB WMa ZONE* legs 2000r AND 2 - oninc ES Example Zone Configuration (Retention Pond) Required Volume Calculation Selected BMP Type = Watershed Nea = Watershed Length = Watershed Slope = Watershed Imperviousness = Percentage Hydrologic Soil Group A = Percentage Hydrologic Sod Group B = Percentage Hydrologic Sod Groups CID = Desired WQCV Drain Time = EDB 51.68 2.000 0.020 63.00% 5.8% 94.2% 0.0% 40.0 Location for I -hr Rainfall Depths = User Input Water Quality Capture Volume 1WQCV) = Excess Urban Runoff Volume (EURV) = 2-yr Runoff Volume (P1 = 0.82 in.) = 5-yr Runoff Volume (P1 = 1.1 in.) = 10-yr Runoff Volume (P1 = 1.38 in.) _ 25-yr Runoff Volume (P1 = 1.86 in.) _ 50-yr Runoff Volume (P1 = 2.29 in.) = 100-yr Runoff Volume (P1 = 2.78 in.) = 500-yr Runoff Volume (P1 = 4.16 in.) = Approximate 2-yr Detention Volume = Approximate 5-yr Detention Volume = Approximate 10-yr Detention Volume = Approximate 25-yr Detention Volume = Approximate 50-yr Detention Volume = Approximate 100-yr Detention Volume _ 1.062 3.572 2.006 2.861 3.965 6.054 7.737 9.958 15.926 1.880 2.690 3.691 4.724 5.404 6.361 Stage -Storage Calculation Zone I Volume (WOCV) _ Zone 2 /olume (EURV - Zone 1) _ Zone 3 Volume 100 -year - Zones 1 & 2) _ Total Detention Basin Volume = Initial Surcharge Volume (ISV) = Initia� Surcnarge Depth (ISD) _L Total Available Detention Depth (Htp,,J = Depth of Tnckie Channel (Hie) _ Slope of Tnckle Channel (Sir) = 1.062 2.510 2.789 6.361 user user user user user Slopes of Main Basin Sides (Sm,,,n) = user Basin Length -to -moth Ratio tR. ) = Initial Surcharge Area (A,sv) ...- Surcharge Volume Length (Low) Surcharge Volume Width (W15„) = Depth of Basin Floor (Hruoe) Length of Basin Floor (Lr,ppq) = Width of Basin Floor (Wr,Wr,) = Area of Basin Floor tAr,0uii) _ Volume of Basin Floor (Vritx. 4 _ Depth of Main Basin (H,,,) _ Length of Main Basin (L,,," N) Widtn of Main Basin LW,,,A,N) = Nea of Main Basin (Ar,,",N) _ Volume of Main Basin (VMA,N) = Calculated Total Basin Volume (V,0,4 ) = user USN(' user user user user user user user user user user user user user loo YE AP UM, r rC E acres ft ft/ft percent percent percent percent hours acre-feet acre-feet acre-feet acre-feet ace -feet acre-feet acre-feet acre-feet acre-feet acre-feet acre-feet acre-feet acre-feet acre-feet acre-feet acre-feet acre-feet acre-feet ace -feet ftA3 ft ft ft ft/ft HV ft"2 ft ft ft ft ft ft"2 ft"3 ft ft ft fts2 ft^3 acre-feet Optional User Override 1 -hr Precipitation inches inches inches inches inches inches 4.16 inches 0.82 1.10 1.38 1.86 2.29 2.78 h Increment = 1 Stage - Storage Descnption Stage (ft) Optional 1 Override I Stage (ft) Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (f"2) Optional Ovemde Area tft"2) Area (acre) Volume ft "3 Volume i ac -ft Top of Micropool - 0.00 I - - - 19.156 0.440 - 0.50 - - - 21,580 0.495 9.969 0.229 - 1.00 - - - 25.021 0.574 21.585 0.4% - 1.50 - - - 29.639 0.680 35.204 0.808 WQCV - 2.00 - - - 34.551 0.793 51202 1.175 - 2.50 - - - 39.841 0.915 70.145 1.610 - 3.00 - - - 45.504 1.045 91,481 2.100 - 3.50 - - - 51.542 1.183 115.743 2.657 - 4.00 - - - 58.105 1.334 143.155 3.286 EURV - 4.50 - - - 64.514 1.481 173.809 3.990 - 5.00 - - - 70.954 1.629 207 676 4.768 - 5.50 - - - 77.622 1.782 244 820 5.620 100-YR - 6.00 - - - 84 493 1.940 285 349 6.551 - 6.50 - - - 91 573 2.102 329.365 7.561 - 7.00 - - - 98.900 2.270 376.983 8.654 - 7.50 - - - 111,485 2.559 429.580 9.862 - 8.00 - - - 124,161 2.850 488,491 11.214 - 8.50 - - - 137.317 3.152 553.861 12.715 • - - - - - r - - - - - - - - - - - Mead-UD-Detention_v3.07 *ism. Basin 8/3O2018 5 23 PM C DETENTION BASIN STAGE -STORAGE TABLE BUILDER 20 15 10 S 25619 28454 UD-Detention, Version 3.07 (February 2017) oL. 0.00 3Lid Area (acres) • 0790 - 0.000 0.00 2.50 5.30 Stage tft I 2.50 5.00 Stage (ft) length (ft) aWidth (ft) —Area (sq.ft.) —Area (acres) Volume lac ft) 7.50 3(i 200 1 100 0 10 00 6.360 3.180 0.000 10 00 Volume (ac4t) Mead-UD-Delentiort_v3.07.'dsm. Basin 8/30/2018. 5 23 PM Detention Basin Outlet Structure Design UD-Detention, Version 3.07 (February 2017) Project. Vista Highlands - Extended Detention Basin Basin ID EDB 10O -1R ;- vrk um_I EURv I Mrocy User Input PERMANENT - POOI (IONE 3 ,ZOME 2 . -ZONE I i ZONE I AND 7 ORIFICES -1OO- YEAR ORIFICE Example Zone Configuration (Retention Pond) Orifice at Underdrain Outlet (typically used to drain Underdrain Orifice Invert Depth - Underdrain Orifice Diameter = WQCV in a Filtration BMP) •t (distance below the filtration media surface) nches N A N/A Zone 1 (WQCV) Zone 2 (EURV) 'one 3 (100 -year) Stage (ft) Zone Volume (ac -ft) Outlet Type 1.85 1-062 Orifice Plate 4.21 2.510 Orifice Plate 5.91 2.789 A'eir&Pipe (Restrict) 6.361 Total Calculated Parameters for Underdrain Underdrain Orifice Area = Underdrain Orifice Centroid = N/A N/A ft' feet User Input: Orifice Plate with one or more orifices or Elliptical Slot Weir (typically used to drain WQCV and/or EURV in a sedimentation BMP) Invert of lowest Orifice = Depth at top of Zone using Orifice Plate = Orifice Plate: Orifice Vertical Spacing = Orifice Plate: Orifice Area per Row = User Input Stage and Total Area of Each Orifice Stage of Orifice Centroid (ft) Orifice Area (sq. inches) Stage of Orifice Centroid (ft) Orifice Area (sq. inches) 000 4.50 N/A N/A ft (relative to basin bottom at Stage = 0 ft) ft (relative to basin bottom at Stage = 0 ft) inches riches Calculated Parameters for Plate WQ Orifice Area per Row = Elliptical Half -Width = Elliptical Slot Centroid = Elliptical Slot Area = N/A N/A N/A N/A ft feet feet ft Row 1 (required) Row 2 (optional) Rov. 3 (optional) Row 4 (optional) Row 5 (optional) Row 6 (optional) Row 7 (optional) Row 8 (optional) 0.00 1.50 3.00 11.00 9.00 9.00 Row 9 (optional) Row 10 (optional) Row 11 (optional) Row 12 )optional) Row 13 )optional) Row 14 (optional) Row 15 (optional) Row 16 (optional) User Input: Vertical Orifice (Circular or Rectangular) Invert of Vertical Orifice = Depth at top of Zone using Vertical Orifice = Vertical Orifice Diameter = Not Selected Not Selected N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A ft (relative to basin bottom at Stage = 0 ft) ft (relative to basin bottom at Stage = 0 ft) inches Calculated Parameters for Vertical Orifice Vertical Orifice Area = Vertical Orifice Centroid = Not Selected Not Selected N/A \, A N/A N/A ft2 feet User Input: Overflow Weir (Dropbox) and Grate (Flat or Sloped) Overflow Weir Front Edge Height. Ho = Overflow Weir Front Edge Length = Overflow Weir Slope = Horiz. Length of Weir Sides = Overflow Grate Open Area % - Debris Clogging % = Zone 3 Weir Not Selected 4 50 N/A 7.00 N/A 0.00 N/A 7.00 N/4 70% N/A 50% N/A ft (relative to basin bottom at Stage = 0 ft) feet H:V (enter zero for flat grate) feet %, grate open area/total area 46 User Input: Outlet Pipe w/ Flow Restriction Plate (Circular Orifice. Restrictor Plate, or Rectangular Orifice) Not Selected Depth to Invert of Outlet Pipe = Outlet Pipe Diameter = Restrictor Plate Height Above Pipe Invert = Zone 3 Restrictor 0.00 N/ A 36 00 NI 29"00 User Input: Emergency Spillway (Rectangular or Trapezoidal) Spillway Invert Stage= Spillway Crest Length = Spillway End Slopes = Freeboard above Max Water Surface = Calculated Parameters for Overflow Weir Height of Grate Upper Edge, H. = Over Flow Weir Slope Length = Grate Open Area / 100-yr Orifice Area = Overflow Grate Open Area w/o Debris = Overflow Grate Open Area w/ Debris ft (distance below basin bottom at Stage = Oft) inches inches ft (relative to basin bottom at Stage = 0 ft) feet H:V feet Zone 3 Weir Not Selected 4.50 N/A 7.00 N/A 5.62 N/A 34.30 N/A 17.15 N/A feet feet should be ≥ 4 ft' ft2 Calculated Parameters for Outlet Pipe w/ Flow Restriction Plate Outlet Orifice Area = Outlet Orifice Centroid = Half -Central Angle of Restrictor Plate on Pipe = Zone 3 Restrictor Not Selected 6.10 N/A 1.32 N/A 2.23 N/A Calculated Parameters for Spiliaray Spillway Design Flow Depth= Stage at Top of Freeboard = Basin Area at Top of Freeboard = feet feet acres ftl feet radians Routed Hydrograph Results Design Storm Peturn Period = One -Hour Rainfall Depth (in) _ Calculated Runoff Volume (acre -ft) = OPTIONAL Override Runoff Volume (acre -ft) _ Inflow Hydrograph Volume (acre -ft) = Predevelopment Unit Peak Flow. q (cfs/acre) = Predevelopment Peak O (cfs) = Peak Inflow 0 (cfs) = Peak Outflow O (cfs) = Ratio Peak Outflow to Predevelopment 0 = Structure Controling Flow = Max Velocity through Grate 1 (fps) = Max Velocity through Grate 2 (fps) = Time to Drain 97% of Inflow Vokme (hours) lime to Drain 99% of Inflow Volume (hours) Maximum Ponding Depth (It) Area at Maximum Ponding Depth (acres) Max mum Volume Stored (acre -ft) = WQCV EURV 2 Year 5 Year 10 Year 25 Year SO Year 100 Ycs' 500 Year 0.53 1.07 0.82 1.10 1.38 1.86 2.29 2. 78 4.16 1.062 3.572 2.006 2.861 3.965 6.054 7.737 9.958 15.926 1.661 3.570 2.004 2.859 3 962 6.049 7.726 9.945 15 918 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.16 0.61 0.93 1.37 2 46 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.8 8.2 31.5 48.2 70.9 127.3 18.2 60.2 34.1 48.3 66.7 100.8 128.0 163.5 257.6 0.6 1.5 1.0 1 3 1.6 24.6 48.0 62.2 73.4 N/A N/A N/A 1.7 0.2 0.8 1.0 0.9 0.6 Plate Plate Plate Plate Plate Overflow Grate 1 Overflow Grate 1 Outlet Plate 1 Outlet Plate 1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.7 1.4 1.8 2.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 39 60 50 56 62 62 59 57 50 42 66 54 62 69 70 68 67 64 1.74 4.06 2.78 3.52 4.33 5.02 5.34 5.80 7.56 0.73 1.35 0.98 1.19 :.43 1.63 1.73 1.88 2.59 0.977 3.353 1.867 2.681 3.728 4.800 5.322 6.169 10.016 Detention Basin Outlet Structure Design UD-Detention, Version 3.07 (February 2017) 300 250 - 200-I _1 3150-• O , S UMS 0 0.1 0.1 1 10 AREA (ft^2], VOLUME (h^3] SOOYR ;N SOOYR OUT a 100YR IN • 100YR OUT SOYA IN a a SOYR OUT 2SYR IN • 2SYR OUT 10YR IN 10YR OUT SYR IN SYR OUT 2YR IN 2YR OUT EURV IN smob • EUR( OUT WQCV IN WQCV OUT 600,000 500,000 4O0,000 300, 000 200,000 100.000 1 TIME [hr] L_ DRAIN TIME [hr] C • • O User Area [ft^2] Interpolated Area (ft^2] • • Summary Area [ft^2] Volume [ft^31 ••••••• Summary Volume [ft^3] Outflow Ws] ••4.•• Summary Outflow WI 0.00 1.00 6.00 77 0 $) 3.00 4 (X) 5.00 S -A -V -D Chart Axis Override IrIiI11111(4111 bou;x1 maximum bourxl X-axis Left le -Axis PONDING DEPTH [ft] Right Y -Axis 1.) 100 -�• 90.00 80.00 70.00 60.00 50.00 3 9 40.0O DEP 0 30.00 20.00 10.00 0.00 8 00 9.00 Detention Basin Outlet Structure Design Time Interval 4.82 min I-tydrngrapn Constant 1.037 Outflow Hydrograuh Workbook r 'lam. Storm Inflow Hydrographs UD-Detention, Version 3.07 (February 2017) The user can override the calculated inflow hydrographs from this workbook with inflow hydrographs developed in a separate program SOURCE WORKBOOK WORKBOOK WORKBOOK WORKBOOK WORKBOOK WORKBOOK WORKBOOK WORKBOOK WORKBOOK TIME WQCV jcfsf EURV jcfsj 2 Year fcfsj 5 Year f cfsj 10 Year [cfsl 25 Year fcfsj 50 Year (cfs] 100 Year lets] 500 Year f cfs; 0:00:00 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 0 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0:04:49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0:09:38 _ 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0:1428 0.80 2.53 146 2.05 2.78 4.02 4.92 6.01 8.49 0:19:17 2.15 6 98 4.00 5.64 7.70 11.39 14.19 17.71 26.40 0:24:06 5.54 17.92 10.27 14.48 19.78 29.24 36.44 45 51 67 94 0:28:55 15.20 19 15 28.20 39 74 54.23 80 08 99.70 124.36 185.11 0:33.44 18.18 60.17 34.06 48.35 66.66 100.82 127.95 163.47 257.06 0:38:34 17.37 57,78 32.62 46 36 64.10 97 70 124.77 160.67 257.55 0:43:23 15.81 52 59 29.69 42 19 58.36 89 25 114.26 147.56 238.05 0:48:17 14.16 47.35 26.66 37.95 52 57 80 46 103.06 133.16 215.01 0:5101 12.26 11.38 23.18 33.10 45.97 70 58 90.57 117.26 190.04 0:57:50 10 67 36 09 20.14 28.83 40.12 61 72 79.26 102.69 166.59 1:02:40 9 67 32 61 18 26 26.09 36.23 35 55 71.19 )2.00 14830 1:07:29 8.02 27 .30 15.23 21 80 30 35 46 77 60.16 78.08 127.16 1.12.18 6.58 22.60 12.56 18.02 25.14 38.83 50.00 64.97 106.00 1,17:07 5.11 17 87 9 85 14.20 19.91 30.95 40.00 52.18 85 30 1:21:56 3.84 13.77 151 10.90 15.3/ 24.03 31.15 10./5 6/.35 1:26:46 2.78 10.25 5.52 8.08 11.47 18.06 23.51 30.87 51.44 1.31.35 2.14 7 71 1 19 6 10 8.61 13.46 17.45 22.81 38.11 1 36.24 1.76 6.21 3 41 4.93 6.93 10.76 13.89 18 09 29.87 1.41:13 1.49 5.23 2 38 •1.16 5.83 9.04 11 66 15.15 24.86 1:46:02 1.30 4,56 2 51 3.63 5.07 / 85 10 10 13.11 21.40 1 50:52 1.17 4 08 2 26 3 25 4.54 700 9 01 11 67 19.00 1.55.41 1.08 3.74 2 07 2.98 4.16 6 41 8.23 10,65 17.28 2:00:30 0 79 2.78 1.53 2 21 3.10 4.83 6.26 8.18 13.60 2:05:19 0.58 2.01 1.11 160 2.24 3.49 4.51 5.90 9.80 2:10:08 4 0.43 1.49 0.82 118 1.66 2.58 3.35 4.38 7.26 2:14:58 0.31 1.11 0 61 0 88 1.23 1.92 2.49 3.25 5.39 2:19:47 0.23 0.81 044 0 64 0.90 1 41 1.83 2.40 3 99 2.24:36 0.16 0.58 0.31 0 46 C.65 1.02 1.32 1 14 2 30 2:29:25 0.12 0.42 0.23 0.33 0.47 0.74 0.96 1.26 2.10 2:34:14 0.08 0 29 0.16 0.23 0.33 0.52 0.68 0.90 1.51 2:39:04 0.05 0.19 0.10 0.15 0.21 0.34 0.45 0.59 1.02 2:43:53 6.02 0.11 0.05 0.08 0.12 0.20 0.26 0.35 0.62 2:48:42 0 01 00.05 0.02 0.04 0.0b 0.09 0.13 0.17 0.32 2:53:31 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.04 006 0 12 2:58:20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 3:03:10 0.00 0.00 o.tx, 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 3:07.59 000 0 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 3:12:48 o.00 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 0 00 0.00 000 3:17:37 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 3:22:26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 00 3'27'16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 0 00 0.00 0.00 3:32.05 0.00 0 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 0 00 0.00 0.00 3:36:54 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 0.0C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3:41:43 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 3-46:32 0.00 000 0.0.E 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3:51) 2 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 3:56:11 000 C 00 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 000 00O 0.00 4:01:00 0.0C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 4:05.49 000 000 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 4:10:38 000 0.00 000 0 00 0 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.15.28 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 0 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4:20:17 000 000 000 0.00 000 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 4:25:06 000 000 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 000 000 0.00 4:29:55 0.00 0 00 0.00 0.00 0 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.34:44 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4:39:34 0.00 000 0.00 0 00 000 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 4:44:23 0.00 000 0.00 000 000 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 4:49:12 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4:54.01 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4:58:50 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5:03:40 0.00 000 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5:08:29 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5:13:18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5:18:07 0.00 000 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5:22:56 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5:27.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 5:32:35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 000 0.00 5:37:24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 00 000 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 5:42:13 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 0 00 000 000 000 0.00 5:47:02 _ 000 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 000 0.00 000 0.00 Detention Basin Outlet Structure Design UD-Detention, Version 3.07 (February 2017) Summary Stage -Area -Volume -Discharge Relationships The user can create a summary S -A -V -D by entering the desired stage increments and the remainder of the table will populate automatically The user should graphically compare the summary S -A -V -D table to the full S -A -V -D table in the chart to confirm it captures all key transition points. Stage Storage Description Stage Area Area Volume Volume Total Outflow For best results, include the stages of all grade slope changes (e.g. ISV and Floor) from the S -A -V table on Sheet Basin'. Also include the inverts of all outlets (e.g. vertical orifice. overflow grate, and spillway where applicable). Final Drainage Report Industrial Development — 1-25 & CR 34 APPENDIX E - DRAINAGE MAPS Kimley »Horn LEGEND • ATON AREA (ACRES) 0 3• (ACOEFFICIENT 00 YR RUNOFF COEFFICIENT ▪ A a DESIGN POINT OR.N ACE BASIN BOUNDARY EXISONG CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR EMISONG STORM SEWER 3 PROPOSED STORM SEWER KllPROPOSED STORM INLET • PROPOSED STORM INLET oGRAP5Kr 'TALE IN FEET 200 E DESIGNED BY MEN DRAWN BY MLR UAEE:KEO BY OLS 06/31/10 U7 W H F - cc z W ~ a a Z o w G w u V w w M p � Q o z O E F Z E D O U 0 -J W FOR ON, ' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION KOIiEy.H0m PROJECT NO .6441004 DRAVANG NAME PLANT SCHEDULE 000 of .' 1 i � J E C) GRAPHIC SCALE iN EE o SO 100 200 a O E DATE yEm CHECOb/SBL ]/ a Ln N W H tY z z LL1 H a a Z ❑ w w ¢ at$ U � w m c ? o 0 z O z O z } r z a FOR ' FOR ' ONLY NO CONSTRUC-ION 1 in ey*Ham PROJECT NO 004 DRAVA. NAM._ L1.1 / o9Oa2 E 201 / 82 79' r��w. rr WAi Uw L / FRONTAGE O • 35>oti 29 w \ \ 50T3'z9'E 178898 LEGEND — INTERIOR LOT LINES SUBDPAQON BOUNDARY EXISTING LINE DENiEE OPEN NSPACE AREA SITE DATA TABLE Rp.me Pen APR, on lot Kns • SNI IHOU1 SPECIFIED OPEN SPACE WILL BE REQUIRED TO DESIGNATE AREAS DURING ME SITE PL PROCESS N SUFFICIENT TO COMPLY NI. IRE 'SLED TOWN REQUIREMENT GRAPH,C SCALE IN FEET 0 100 200 4,0 L O cu E DESIGNED BY MEH DRAWN BY MEI, CHECKED BY OLS DATE 08/El/IN w Q CO CO F- O Ll Z U < Q _ of d W CO L6, < 0ZCU) Z f-- d Z mo D O U O W NOT FOR CONS) ROOT ION IGmleysHom 096.1004 DRAWING NAME CC.1 Applicant's Certificate of Compliance Regarding Minerals With Article 65.5 of Title 24, Colorado Revised Statutes (H.B. 01-1088, Effective July 1, 2001) Certification I, Marc D. Pfleging of Scannell Properties, LLC, Applicant for the Mead Mixed -Use Subdivision development, hereby certify that I or my agent have examined the records in the Office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder to determine if any owners or lessees of any severed mineral estate in the property which is the subject of the proposed development can be identified, as required by Article 65.5 of Title 24, Colorado Revised Statues (also known as H.B. 01-1088 ("the Act"). Further, based on this examination, I have determined that: Mineral estate owners or lessees exist in the property to whom notice of the proposed development application will need to be sent as required by the Act. I certify that the information and exhibits I have submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. SCANNELL PROPERTIES, LLC By: �'�`�� August 31, 2018 Applicant Signature Date A copy of the mineral estate lease (Oil and Gas Lease dated July 10, 2013 between WCR 34 & HWY 25- 220, LLC and Grizzly Petroleum Company, LLC) regarding the property, which provides for the lessee to whom notice of the proposed development application will need to be sent as required by the Act, is attached to this Certificate. Grizzly Petroleum Company, LLC has an address of 1700 Broadway, Suite 650, Denver, CO 80290-1170. 3952631 08/01/2013 02:53 PM Total Pages: 4 Rec Fee: $26.00 Steve Moreno - Clerk and Recorder, Weld County, CO Modified PRODUCERS 88 -PAID UP OIL AND GAS LEASE THIS AGREEMENT, dated the 10"' of July, 2013, is made and entered into by and between WCR 34 & HWY 25-220, LLC, whose address is 8800 N. Gainey Center Dr., Suite 225, Scottsdale, AZ 85258, hereinafter called Lessor (whether one or more) and GRIZZLY PETROLEUM COMPANY, LLC, whose address S 1700 Broadway, Suite 650, Denver, CO 80290-1170, hereinafter called Lessee. WITNESSETH, That the Lessor, for and in consideration of TEN AND MORE ($10.00+) DOLLARS cash in hand paid, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and the covenants and agreements hereinafter contained, has granted, demised, leased and let, and by these presents does grant, demise, lease and let exclusively unto the said Lessee, the land hereinafter described, with the exclusive right for the purpose of drilling, mining, exploring by geophysical and other methods, and developing, operating, and producing therefrom oil and all gas of whatsoever nature or kind, thereon to produce, save and take care of said hydrocarbon products, all that certain tract(s) of land situated in the County of Weld, State of Colorado, described as follows, to -wit See Exhibit "A', Legal Description, attached hereto and incorporated by this reference herein. Notwithstanding any particular description, it is nevertheless the intention of Lessor to include within this lease and Lessor does hereby lease any lands and rights acquired or retained by Lessor by avulsion, accretion, reliction or otherwise as a result of a change in the boundaries or centerline of any river or stream traversing or adjoining the lands described above, as well as all riparian lands and rights which may be incident, appurtenant, related or attributed to Lessor in any lake, reservoir, stream or river traversing or adjoining the lands described in Exhibit A, and all lands included in any road, easement or light of way traversing the lands described in Exhibit A,. Lessee further grants Lessee, the right to use and easement under all of the lands for the purposes of exercising Lessee's rights under this lease, and the right of ingress and egress to the lands only for purposes of conducting seismic operations. 1. It is agreed that this lease shall remain in force for a tens of Three (3) years from this date and as long thereafter as oil or gas of whatsoever nature or kind is produced from said leased premises or on acreage pooled therewith, or drilling operations are continued as hereinafter provided. If, at the expiration of the primary term of this lease, oil or gas Is not being produced on the leased premises or on acreage pooled therewith but Lessee is then engaged in drilling or re -working operations thereon, then this lease shall continue in force so long as operations are being continuously prosecuted on the leased premises or on acreage pooled therewith; and operations shall be considered to be continuously prosecuted if not more than one hundred twenty (120) days shall elapse between the completion or abandonment of one well and the beginning of operations for the drilling of a subsequent well. If after discovery of oil or gas on said land or on acreage pooled therewith, the production thereof should cease from any cause after the primary term, this lease shall not terminate if Lessee commences additional drilling or re -working operations within one hundred and twenty (120) days from date of cessation of production or from date of completion of dry hole. If oil or gas shall be discovered and produced as a result of such operations at or after the expiration of the primary term of this lease, this lease shall continue in force so long as oil or gas is produced in paying quantities from the leased premises or on acreage pooled therewith. In the event a well or wells is drilled and completed on the lands, or on the lands pooled therewith, for the purpose of developing coalbed gas, the word "operations" shall mean, in addition to those matters covered in the preceding paragraph. (1) operations of said wells to remove water or other substances from the coalbed, even though such operations do not result In the production of hydrocarbons in paying quantities, or (2) shutting -in or otherwise discontinuing production from said wells to allow for surface or underground mining affecting the drillsite or weilbore. 2. This is a PAID -UP LEASE. Unless otherwise stated herein, in consideration of the down cash payment, Lessor agrees that Lessee shall not be obligated, except as otherwise provided herein, to commence or continue any operations during the primary term. Lessee may at any time or times during or after the primary tern surrender this lease as to all or any portion of said land and as to any strata or stratum by delivering to Lessor or by filing for record a release or releases, and be relieved of all obligation thereafter accruing as to the acreage surrendered. 3. in consideration of the premises the said Lessee covenants and agrees: 1° To deliver to the credit of Lessor, free of cost, in the pipe line or tanks associated with the wells to which Lessee may connect wells on said land, the equal 18.75% part of all oil produced and saved from the leased premises. 2nd To pay Lessor on gas and casinghead gas produced from said land (1) when sold by Lessee, 18.75% of the proceeds derived from such sale or (2) when used by Lessee off said land or in the manufacture of gasoline or other products, the market value, at the mouth of the well, of 18.75% of such gas and casinghead gas. Post production costs shall not be deducted from Lessor's royalty. 3'd To pay Lessor for gas produced from any oil well and used off the premises or in the manufacture of gasoline or any other product, a royalty of 18.75% of the proceeds, at the mouth of the well, payable monthly at the prevailing market rate. Lessor shall pay all local, state, or federal taxes associated with payments of royalties under this Paragraph 3. 4. Where oil and/or gas of whatsoever nature or kind, from a well capable of producing gas is not sold or used, Lessee may pay or tender as royalty to the royalty owners One Dollar per year per net royalty acre retained hereunder, such payment or tender to be made on or before the anniversary date of this lease next ensuing after the expiration of 90 days from the date such well is shut in and thereafter on or before the anniversary date of this lease during the period such well is shut in. If such payment or tender is made, ft will be considered that oil and/or gas is being produced within the meaning of this lease. Payment of shut-in oil or gas royalties shall not hold this Lease for more than two (2) consecutive years following expiration of the primary term. 5. If said Lessor owns a lesser Interest in the above described land than the entire and undivided fee simple estate therein, then the royalties (including any shut-in oil and/or gas royalty) herein provided for shall be paid the Lessor only in the proportion which Lessor's interest bears to the whole and undivided fee. 6. Lessee shall have the right to use, free of cost, gas and oil produced on said land, and any produced water resulting from Lessee's drilling and completions operations, for Lessee's operation thereon. 7. When requested by Lessor, Lessee shall bury Lessee's pipeline below plow depth. 8. No well shall be drilled nearer than 500 feet at the time of drtiling to the house or barn on said premises without written consent of Lessor. 9. Lessee shall pay for damages caused by Lessee's operations to growing crops on said land. 10. Lessee shall have the right at any time to remove all machinery and fixtures placed on said premises, including the right to draw and remove casing. 11. The rights of Lessor and Lessee hereunder may be assigned in whole or part. No change in ownership of Lessor's Interest (by assignment or otherwise) shall be binding on Lessee until Lessee has been furnished with notice, consisting of certified copies of all recorded instruments or documents and other information necessary to establish a complete chain of record title form Lessor, and then only with respect to payments thereafter made. No other kind of notice, whether actual or constructive, shall be binding on Lessee. No present or future division of Lessor's ownership as to different portions or parcels of said land shall operate to enlarge the obligations or diminish the rights of Lessee, and all Lessees' operations may be conducted without regard to any such division. If all or any pert of this lease is assigned, no leasehold owner shall be liable for any act or omission or any other leasehold owner. 1 3952631 08/01/2013 02:53 PM Page 2 of 4 12. Lessee, at its option, is hereby given the right and power at any time and from lime to time as a recurring right, either before or after production, as to all or any part of the land described herein and as to any one or more of the formations hereunder, to communitize, pool or unitize the leasehold estate and the mineral estate covered by this lease with other land(s), lease or leases in the Immediate vicinity for the production of oil and gas, or separately for the production of either, when In Lessee's judgment it is necessary or advisable to do so, and irrespective of whether authority similar to this exists with respect to such other land, lease or leases. Likewise, units previously formed to include formations not producing oil or gas, may be reformed to exclude such non -producing formations. The forming or reforming of any unit shall be accomplished by Lessee executing and filing of record a declaration of such unitization or reformation, which declaration shall describe the unit. Any unit may include land upon which a well has theretofore been completed or upon which operations for drilling have theretofore been commenced. Production, drilling or reworking operations or a well shut in for want of a market anywhere on a unit which includes all or a part of this lease shall be treated as if it were production, drilling or reworking operations or a well shut In for want of a market under this lease. In lieu of the royalties elsewhere herein specified, including shut-in oil and/or gas royalties, Lessor shall receive on production from the unit so communitlzed or pooled royalties only on the portion of such production allocated to the Lessor's interests covered by this lease: such allocation shall be that proportion of the unit production that the total number of surface acres covered by this lease and included in the unit bears to the total number of surface acres in such unit. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, pooling and unitization shall be limited to spacing, unitization, and pooling rules, regulations and/ or orders existing as of and subsequent to the date set forth above approved by the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, including units established pursuant to C.R.S. 34-60-118 for maintenance of pressure. Lessee shall have no right to commit the lands described in this Lease to a state unit pursuant to C.R.S. 34-60-118 or federal exploratory unit without the consent of Lessor. 13. When operations or production are delayed or interrupted by fire, storm, flood, war rebellion, insurrection, riot, strike, or governmental delays in obtaining permits, approvals, or other allowances as a result of any non -financial cause beyond the control of Lessee, the time of such delay or interruption shall not be counted against Lessee and this lease shalt remain in force during such delay or interruption and one hundred and twenty (120) days thereafter, anything in this lease to the contrary notwithstanding except that the provisions of this paragraph 13 shall not keep this Lease in effect for more than a period of eighteen (18) months from the date of any of the acts referenced above. 14. Lessor shall grant, sell, and convey to Lessee the right to conduct seismic operations on the lands set forth in Exhibit "A", which shall include an exclusive right to a surface and mineral seismic permit. Lessee's seismic operations will be conducted in accordance with good standard practices and in a prudent and careful manner and Lessee and its agents and contractors (collectively the "Lessee'), jointly and severally, will assume and pay, hold the Lessors free and harmless from, and indemnify and defend Lessors from any and all claims and damages including, without limitation, attorney's fees and costs of court that may result from work by Lessee by virtue of the permission granted in this Agreement, with the exception of any claims or damages arising out of or related to the negligence, omission, or gross misconduct of the Lessor. This provision shall apply whether the claims are by persons or to property located on or off the Lands, including persons employed by Lessors and property owned by the Lessors. There shall be no additional consideration paid for purposes of utilizing the surface of the lands for Lessee's seismic operation. The parties agree that the consideration paid for this Agreement is not compensation for any such damages under this paragraph 14. All use of the surface of the leased lands for seismic operations shall cease after June 30, 2015. 15. Lessor agrees that the Lessee shall have the right at any time to redeem for Lessor, by payment, any mortgages, taxes or other liens on the above described lands, in the event of default of payment by Lessor and be subrogated to the rights of the holder thereof, and the undersigned Lessor, for itself and its heirs, successors and assigns, hereby surrender and release all right of dower and homestead in the premises described herein, insofar as said right of dower and homestead may in any way affect the purposes for which this lease is made, as recited herein. 16. Should any one or more of the parties hereinabove named as Lessor fail to execute this lease, it shall nevertheless be binding upon all such parties who do execute it as Lessor. The word "Lessor; as used in this lease, shall mean any one or more or all of the parties who execute this lease as Lessor. All the provisions of this lease shall be binding on the heirs, successors and assigns of Lessor and Lessee. 17. Additional Provisions: a. No Surface Occupancy. Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, this Lease Is a "NO SURFACE OCCUPANCY' Oil and Gas Lease and Lessee, its successors and assigns shall not conduct any operations or locate any facilities on the surface of the leased lands, excepting paragraph number fourteen, herein. b. Subsurface Easement. Lessee shall have the right to drill and operate wells through and under said lands, irrespective of the bottomhole locations of said wells. To this end, Lessor hereby grants and conveys to Lessee a subsurface easement for all purposes associated with such wells. Such right shall not include the right to install pipelines on the leased lands. c. Letter Agreement. This lease is subject to the terms of a Letter Agreement executed by the Lessor and Lessee on the 10s' day of July, 2013. Notwithstanding anything in this lease to the contrary, no additional consideration shall be paid for purposes of executing the Letter Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument is executed as of the date first above written. LESSOR: WRC 34 & HWY 25.220, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company By: RMG Real Estate Services XV, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability comps y, its Adm' istrator STATE OF ARIZONA COUNTY OF MARICOPA ) ss. ) By: Ronald H. CI cRae Rs Authorized Officer The foregoing Oil and Gas Lease was acknowledged before me this J day of 77..11 2013, by Ronald H. McRae, as Authorized Officer of RMG Real Estate Services XV, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company and Administrator of WRC 34 & HWY 25-220, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: f 0131(20) $ 2 3952631 08/01/2013 02:53 PM Page 3 of 4 LESSEE: STATE OF r aGp,PAQ4ss. COUNTY OF UENVf2 ) GRIZZLY PETROLEUM COMPANY, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company By: Steve cy, its Vice Pres The foregoing Oil and Gas Lease was acknowledged before me this day of / UL. y , 2013, by Steve R. Stacy, as Vice President of GRIZZLY PETROLEUM COMPANY, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: 3 3952631 08/01/2013 02:53 PM Page 4 of 4 EXHIBIT "A" - Laud Description Made a part of and attached to that Oil and Gas Lease dated July 10, 2013 between WCR 34 & HWY 25-220, LLC and GRIZZLY PETROLEUM COMPANY, LLC 218.503 acres, more or less, situated in the W/2 and SE/4 of Section 11, T3N, R68W, Weld County, Colorado as more particularly described as the following Two (2) Tracts: TRACT 1 (Two Parcels): Parcel I of Tract 1: Parcel II of Tract I: TRACT 2 (Lots 2-11): 160 acres, more or less, consisting of Two (2) 80 acre tracts as described in that certain Special Warranty Deed dated June 7, 2006 from MILLER MOTOR SPORTS PARK, a Utah Limited Liability Company to WCR 34 & HWY 25-220, LLC, a Colorado Limited Liability Company, recorded in Rec. # 3396398 That portion of Section 11, Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 66" P.M., Weld County, Colorado. More particularly described as follows: Considering the West line of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 11 as bearing North 00'28'37" East and with all bearings contained herein relative thereto. Commencing at the West Quarter Comer of said Section 11; Thence along the West line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 11; North 00'28'37" East, 587.75 feet to the Southerly line of the Great Western Railway; Thence along the Southerly line , North 75'56'39 East (record N. 75"50' E.) 93.10 feet to the true POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence continuing along said Southerly Line North 75'56'39' East, 2648.61 feet to the North -South Centerline of said Section 11; Thence along said centerline, South 00'30'05" West 1789.30 Feet, Thence South 89"29'55" East 672.74 Feet; Thence South 00'43'19" West 794.32 feet, Thence North 89"49'41' West 300.00 Feet; Thence North 88"58'45" West, 82.76 feet; Thence North 51'10'59' West, 2384.41 feet; Thence North 90"00'00' West 1004.00 feet to the Easterly line of Interstate Highway 25; Thence along said Eastleriy line North 03"35'37" East (Record N. 02'49'30" E.), 450.00 feet to the true Point of Beginning. County of Weld, State of Colorado. That portion of Section 11, Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6s' P.M., Weld County Colorado. More particularly described as follows: Considering the West line of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 11 as bearing North 00"28'37' East and with all bearings contained herein relative thereto. Commencing at the West Quarter Corner of said Section 11; Thence along the West line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 11; North 00"28'37" East, 587.75 feet to the Southerly line of the Great Western Railway; Thence along the Southerly line , North 75'56'39 East (record N. 75'50' E.) 93.10 feet; Thence along the Easterly line of Interstate Highway 25, South 03'35'37" West, 450.00 feet to the True POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence South 90"00'00' East 1004.00 feet; Thence South 51"10'59" East, 2384.41 feet; Thence South 00'52'30' West 510.57 feet: to the Northerly line of that certain Tract Platted as a Recorded Exemption in the Weld County Records; Thence along the Northerly and Westerly lines of said Recorded Exemption the following four (4) courses and distances; (1) South 89"33'46" West (Record N. 89"22'55" W.), 100.71 feet: (2) South 56'42'25' West (Record N. 55'37'52" E.), 472.45 feet; (3) South 00'53'32' West (Record S. 00'11'01' E.), 44.70 feet (4) South 36"08'28" East (Record S. 37"13'01" E.), 200.70 feet; Thence along the Northerly lines of the Raterink Subdivision the following six (6) courses and distances: (1) North 81'18'32' West, 394.61 feet: (2) North 57"30'28' West, 429.00 feet (3) North 46'57'37' West 1096.31 feet: (4) North 43"49'10" West, 1083.51 feet: (5) North 22'30'04" West, 367.60 feet: (6) North 89"20'28' West, 50.00 feet to the Easterly line of Interstate Highway 25; Thence along said Easterly line the following two (2) courses and distances: (1) Parallel with and 50.00 feet perpendicularly east of the West line of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 11, North 00'28'37' East 28.94 feet: (2) North 03"35'37" East (Record N. 02"49'30' E.), 283.35 feet to the true POINT OF BEGINNING, County of Weld, State of Colorado. 58.503 acres, more or less, known as Lots 2-11, Raterink Subdivision according to the plat recorded in R2419753 as described in that certain Special Warranty Deed dated June 7, 2006 from MILLER MOTOR SPORTS PARK, a Utah Limited Liability Company to WCR 34 & HWY 25-220, LLC, a Colorado Limited Liability Company, recorded in Rec. # 3396394 all recorded in the Real Property Records of Weld County, Colorado. Further described as Lots 2 Through 11, Raterink Subdivision, Replat 'A." according to the Plat Recorded December 21, 1994 in Book 1472 as Reception No. 2419753, County of Weld, State of Colorado. 4 Argus: History Colorado Collection Page 1 of 1 €4 HisroRy ,„„. HISTORY COLORADO ONLINE Cn LLECTION I©oIII e©. Explore Colorado's past through the archives , artifacts, and photographs of the History Colorado Collection. The Hart Research L.hrai y provide, access to the History Colorado Collecuon as well as research assistance and photo reproduction services. The Research Library s open to the paulic and r.ea of criaigei Wennesday — Saturday. 10.00 — 3:00• or contact them via email cosearch@state.co.us or tuleptwne 303-866-2305. )card r Shop (Owen Farm Go to Advanced Search Collection Highlights My Favorites Search More Archives Our Services ,Search Print it Save to Favorites 0 Submit Request Found 1 record(s) Image Object Name ,Clear Search Result^ [w Mor Title - Object ID photograph PH.PROP.520 V http://5008.sydneyplus.com/HistoryColorado ArgusNet Finai/Portal.o px?lang=en-US 8/24/2018 Argus: History Colorado Collection Page 1 of 1 1 I STORY HISTORY COLORADO ONLINE COLLECTION I©m6®e©• xplore Colorado's past through the archives, artifacts, and photographs of the History Colorado Collection the Hart Research Library provides access to the Hickory Colorado Collection as well as research assistance and photo reproduction services. the Research Library is open to the public and free of charge: Wednesday — Saturday, 10:00 — 3:00, or contact them via email 3osearch@state.co.usortelephone 303-866-2305. `,eJrch Shop Collection Highlights My Favorites Search More Archives Our Services LBoshouwers Go to Advanced Search Print Found no record(s) Search Clear Search Results http://5008.sydneyplus.com/HistoryColorado ArgusNet Final/Portal.aspx?tang==en-US 8/24/2018 Argus: History Colorado Collection Page 1 of 1 €41 iISTORY� HISTORY COLORADO ONLINE COLLECTION 1O13OM CM xplore Colorado's past through the archives, artifacts, and photcgraphs of the History Colorado Collection the Hart Research Library provides access to the History Col ado Collection as well as research assistance and photo reproduction Services. the Research Library is open to the public and five of _.harge: Weui ;esday - Satui jay, 1j:00 — 3:00, or contact them via email �osearch@state.co.us ortelephone 303-866-2305. SLArch Shop Collection Highlights My Favorites Search More Archives Our Services Keystone Farm j ,Search Go to Advanced Search Print Found no record(s) ',Clear Search Results http://5008.sydneyplus.com/HistoryColorado ArgusNet Final/Portal.aspx?langen-US 8/24/2018 Argus: History Colorado Collection Page 1 of 1 �ISTORY�� I I:M O E MI HISTORY COLORADO ONLINE COLLECTION xplore Colorado's past through the archives, artifacts, and photographs of the History Colorado Collection the Hart Research Library provides access to the History Colorado Collection as well as research assistance and photo reproduction services. the Research Library is open to the public and free of charge: Wednesday - Saturday, 10:00 - 3:00, or contact them via email :osearch@state.co.us ortelephone 303-866-2305. Search Shop Miller Motor Sports Park Go to Advanced Search Print Found no record(s) Collection Highlights My Favorites Search Search More Archives Our Services `Clear Search Results http://5008.sydneyplus.com/HistoryColorado ArgusNet Final/Portal.aspx?lang—en-US 8/24/2018 lierracon GeoReport Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed FedEx Facility Town of Mead, Weld County, Colorado July 26, 2018 Terracon Project No. 22185003 Prepared for: Scannell Properties Indianapolis, Indiana Prepared by: Terracon Consultants, Inc. 1242 Bramwood Place Longmont, Colorado 80501 ter racon. com lierracon Environmental Facilities Geotechnical Materials July 26, 2018 Scannell Properties 8801 River Crossing Boulevard, Suite 300 Indianapolis, Indiana 46240 Attn: Mr. Christopher R. Miller, P.E. — Development Manager P: (317) 218 1667 E: Chrism@scannellproperties.com Re: Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed FedEx Facility SE of E. 1-25 Frontage Road and WCR 36 Town of Mead, Weld County, Colorado Terracon Project No. 22185003 Mr. Miller: lierracon GeoR re o tp We have completed the Geotechnical Engineering services for the project referenced above. This study was performed in general accordance with Terracon Proposal No. P22185003 dated January 22, 2017 and our Supplement to Agreement for Services dated June 18, 2018. This report presents the findings of the subsurface exploration and provides geotechnical recommendations concerning earthwork and the design and construction of foundations, floor slabs and pavements for the proposed project. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. If you have any questions concerning this report, or if we may be of further service, please contact us. Sincerely, Terracon Consultants, Inc. Eric S. Willis, P.E. Senior Project Manager/Engineer Eric D. Bernhardt, P.E. Geotechnical Department Manager Terracon Consultants, Inc. 1242 Bramwood Place Longmont, Colorado 80501 P (303) 776 3921 F (303) 776 4041 terracon.com Environmental Facilities Geotechnical Materials lierracon GeoReport REPORT TOPICS REPORT SUMMARY i INTRODUCTION 1 S ITE CONDITIONS 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2 GEOTECHNICAL CHARACTERIZATION 4 GEOTECHNICAL OVERVIEW 7 EARTHWORK 8 S HALLOW FOUNDATIONS 15 SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS 18 FLOOR SLABS 18 LATERAL EARTH PRESSURES 20 PAVEMENTS 22 ADDITIONAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS 30 GENERAL COMMENTS 32 Note: Tills report was originally delivered in a web-oased format. Orange Bold text in the report indicates a referenced section heading. The PDF version also includes hyperlinks which direct the reader to that section and clicking on the lierracon Git'oRepc 'rt logo will bring you back to this page. For more interactive features, please view your project online at cl i ent. terracon . com . ATTACHMENTS EXPLORATION AND TESTING PROCEDURES S ITE LOCATION AND EXPLORATION PLANS EXPLORATION RESULTS (Boring Logs arid Laboratory Data) SUPPORTING INFORMATION (General Notes, Unified Soil Classification System and Description of Rock Properties Responsive ■ Resourceful • Reliable Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed FedEx Facility • Town of Mead, Weld County, Colorado July 26, 2018 • Terracon Project No. 22185003 REPORT SUMMARY Topic 1 Geotechnical Characterization lierracon 7GeoReport Overview Statement 2 Subsurface conditions encountered in the borings generally consisted of lean clay with varying amounts of silt and sand. clayey sand and silty, clayey sand overlying sedimentary bedrock. Depth to bedrock is variable on the site and was found as shallow as about 41/2 feet on the northeast part of the site to greater than 40 feet on the southern part of the site. The bedrock consisted primarily of claystone/siltstone with varying amounts of sand and sandstone/siltstone. Groundwater/perched water was measured in about 70 percent of the borings at depths of about 7 to 18% feet below existing ground surface. Geotechnical Overview Comparatively shallow groundwater/perched water is present at some locations on this site. In particular, shallowest water levels were typically found on the northern and western parts of the site (vicinity of borings TB -9, 16, 17, 18, 22, 23 and 25), where water was typically measured at depths of about 7 to 81/2 feet below existing ground surface. Localized areas of shallow water were also found in the southeast corner of the site (vicinity of borings TB -32 and 41) and could be encountered at other locations on the site. Site grading should be planned and designed to avoid excessive cuts where shallow water is known to exist, and also in areas where such grading would create shallow water conditions in order to reduce impacts of dewatering and unstable subgrades. If deeper cuts are unavoidable, installation of subsurface drain systems will likely be needed and subgrade stabilization/improvement should be anticipated and budgeted for. Preliminary grading indicates fill placement on the order of about 6 to 15 feet is planned for the southern one-half or the service center building. Fill placement in pavement areas on the southern part of the site will range from about 5 to 10 feet. The fill layer itself will experience some self -weight compression/settlement as well as induce settlement of the underlying clay soils. Self -weight settlement of the fill layer could be reduced, but not eliminated, by using select imported sand -gravel soils rather than the on -site clays and a high level of compaction. To reduce the impact of fill induced settlement, shallow foundations, floor slabs and pavements should not be placed on deeper fills until the majority of settlement has occurred. Timing of settlement is very difficult to anticipate because of the large number of variables. Therefore, we recommend a monitoring program be implemented to determine when settlement induced from site grading fill is substantially complete. Shallow Foundations Considering the size and type of construction planned and the subsurface conditions encountered in our test borings, we believe spread footings bearing on approved native clay soils and/or properly compacted engineered fill can be used f or support of the proposed buildings and other lightly loaded structures provided ample time is allowed for settlement/compression of the site grading fill and underlying native soils before constructing foundations. Responsive ■ Resourceful • Reliable Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed FedEx Facility • Town of Mead, Weld County, Colorado July 26, 2018 • Terracon Project No. 22185003 Topic Floor Slabs Earthwork lierracon GeoReport Overview Statement 2 Swell -consolidation tests indicate the native clay soils likely to influence floor slab performance on this site typically have low swell potential at in -place moisture content and density. Properly placed fill consisting of the on -site clay soils and/or import materials having similar or better properties is expected to have negligible to low swell potential as well. Based on this data and our experience, we believe conventional slab -on -grade construction can be used on this site provided ample time is allowed for settlement/compression of the site grading fill and underlying native soils before constructing floor slabs. On -site clay soils, properly processed bedrock (if encountered) or low volume change import materials may be used as fill/backfill on the site. Self -weight settlement of deeper fills could be reduced, but not eliminated, by using select imported sand -gravel soils rather than the on -site clays and a high level of compaction. The clay soils on this site are susceptible to disturbance and loss of strength under repeated construction traffic, particularly for cut areas and excavations approaching and below the level of groundwater. Consequently, "pumping" scls and unstable subgrades could develop during earthwork and other construction activities. Based on the subsurface conditions, some soil improvement and stabilization should be anticipated and budgeted for this project. Pavements Design pavement thickness for heavy-duty pavements include 101/2 inches of concrete pavement over 4 inches of aggregate base course. As an alternative, 9 inches of asphalt over 12 inches of aggregate base course (or an equivalent full -depth asphalt section) could be considered for heavy-duty pavements. Additional pavement section alternatives for light -duty pavements and discussion are presented in the report. 1. If the reader is reviewing this report as a pdf, the topics above can be used to access the appropriate section of the report by simply clicking on the topic itself. 2. This summary is for convenience only. It should be used in conjunction with the entire report for decision making and design purposes. The section titled General Comments should be read for an understanding of the limitations of this geotechnical engineering report. 3. Close monitoring of the construction operations and implementing drainage recommendations discussed in this report will be important in achieving the intended foundation, slab and pavement performance. We therefore recommend Terracon be retained to monitor this portion of the work. Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable ii Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed FedEx Facility SE of E. 1-25 Frontage Road and WCR 36 Town of Mead, Weld County, Colorado Terracon Project No. 22185003 July 26, 2018 INTRODUCTION A geotechnical engineering report has been completed for the proposed FedEx facility to be located southeast of E. 1-25 Frontage Road and Weld County Road (WCR) 36 in the Town of Mead, Colorado. Forty-one (41) borings, designated TB -1 through TB -41, were performed to depths of about 10 to 40 feet below existing ground surface within the proposed building footprint, pavement areas and other areas of the site. Maps showing the site and boring locations are shown in the Site Location and Exploration Plan sections, respectively. Boring logs and laboratory testing data are included in the Exploration Results section of this report. The purpose of these services is to provide information and geotechnical engineering recommendations relative to: • Subsurface soil/bedrock conditions • Floor system design and construction • Groundwater conditions • Seismic site classification • Site preparation and earthwork • Pavement design and construction • Foundation design and construction • Site drainage considerations The recommendations contained in this report are based on the results of field and laboratory testing, engineering analyses, experience with similar soil/bedrock conditions and structures, and our understanding of the proposed project. SITE CONDITIONS The following description of site conditions is derived from our site visit in association with the field explorations and our review of publicly available geologic and the topographic map provided. Item Location Description The project is located SE of E. 1-25 Frontage Road and WCR 36 in Town of Mead, Weld County, Colorado. The lot encompasses roughly 40 acres. The general location of the project site is 40.2406° N 104.9763° W. See Site Location Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable 1 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed FedEx Facility • Town of Mead, Weld County, Colorado July 26, 2018 ■ Terracon Project No. 22185003 lierracon GeoReport Item Description Improvements/Existing Existing Site features The for system undeveloped the corner approximate property crop project along of production the site. is agricultural northern with project currently An an and/or oil/gas boundary irrigation site. a land vacant agricultural facility The and of pond Great parcel the scattered is located were lot. of purposes. Western land noted single to and the Railroad A on family is center the north currently site. homes of ROW -pivot the being In irrigation general, surround northwest forms used the Current Ground Cover Immature 2018) and wheat mature crop crop during during our initial our supplemental field exploration exploration (March (June 21 and 28, 2018). 22, Existing Topography locally Review site we property. percent differentials and estimate slopes the of on present maintenance Surface the down most of a topographic maximum about to of on the slopes the the 151/2 shop/fuel south site. difference are western feet map Steeper and estimated and provided canopy southwest. in part 51/2 slopes, elevation feet structures, indicates to of be the across Based up on to of site. the the the about about respectively. on order ground We service the 30 4 topographic to of measured surface feet about 5 center across percent, 114 building on grade map, to the the are 3 Water Features located to Significant pond southeast our supplemental mile the initial associated radius southeast. to field corner the water of field the exploration; south features with of site the exploration. of include the lot. the were center lot. No however; water McKay not In Prominent -pivot observed addition, was the Reservoir irrigation noted pond water on an in to the system contained apparent features this the project north is feature located within site. water wetlands and at about However, the during Marie near time area a the of our is '/S- a Lake PROJECT DESCRIPTION Our initial understanding of the project was provided in our proposal and was discussed in the project planning stage. A period of time/collaboration has transpired since the project was initiated, and our final understanding of the project conditions is as follows: Item Project Description Description The project will include design and construction of a FedEx service center facility and associated site infrastructure. As currently planned, the facility will include an approximate 130.000 square foot service center building with an attached office building (10,000 square feet), a 15,000 to 20,000 square feet maintenance shop building and a 3,000 square feet fuel canopy structure. Information provided indicates all buildings will be single -story structures Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable 2 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed FedEx Facility a Town of Mead, Weld County. Colorado July 26, 2018 N Terracon Project No. 22185003 lierracon GeoRepoff Item Description Building Construction We engineered on reinforced break bearing grade is not understand room are planned masonry preferred concrete for most buildings) may construction. the for project. of foundation be the the constructed interior with buildings We some systems. assume floors. type using will be of pre conventional steel architectural However, -cast -framed concrete the office concrete structures veneer panels building construction supported slabs or (pre- load -on and - - metal pods Basement/below-grade Foundation/Floor Loads Structural However, light the • ■ ■ following to Column/Point loading based loads: on foundation conditions the Loads: size loads. were and type not For of available construction, purposes at of the the we time anticipate proposal, heavy floor of usage. depending the we proposal. relatively assume moderate 50 to 125 kips (assumed) Wall/Line Loads: and 2 to 4 klf (assumed) Floor Loads: assumed type, location to be within light the to comparatively building upon building Finished Elevations Floor (FFE) Service Maintenance center shop building building with attached — Approximate office — FFE Approximate of 4954.3 FFE feet of 4959.5 feet Grading Preliminary fill one-half about maintenance Site from deepest while placement grading about the 6 grading the 15 0 cuts on feet shop to are service 9 the and feet planned fills is building plans order planned fills are and center indicate in for planned of are about pavement about for the building, expected the 0 northeast cuts 6 to along to southern 10 and on the 7 while to feet, the feet range other southern and order fill respectively. are one-half. northwest placement from areas planned of border about Cuts/fills the In parts 2 for on 0 of to site particular, to the the the of 41/2 3 within will lot. feet northern order the feet. range and site, the the of to of cuts deepest about of Cut and Fill Slopes Assumed to be no steeper than (Horizontal to Vertical). 3H to 4H:1V Infrastructure Extensive areas for within for numerous development and about paving access 5 will drive semi to 8 and -trucks feet is be lanes of currently completed (heavy-duty). finished employee grades. planned for the automobiles Installation A for project the detention west and of -central (light underground pond will -duty) include will part be of as included the parking well utilities site. as for Below Areas/Retaining Grade Walls Below-grade/basement are not aware of any significant construction site is retaining not planned walls for for the the project. buildings and we Responsive ■ Resourceful • Reliable 3 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed FedEx Facility • Town of Mead, Weld County, Colorado July 26, 2018 • Terracon Project No. 22185003 GEOTECHNICAL CHARACTERIZATION Subsurface Profile lierracon GeoRepoH The geotechnical characterization as described in the table and sections below forms the basis of our geotechnical calculations and evaluation of site preparation, foundation, floor system and pavement options. As noted in General Comments, the characterization is based upon widely spaced exploration points across the site, and variations are likely. Subsurface conditions at the boring locations can be generalized as follows: Approximate Depth of Stratum to Bottom 1 Material Encountered Consistency Relative Hardness Density/ or General Properties Engineering About 6 inches Vegetative soil layer N/A N/A About 41/2 to 18 feet sandy Lean clayey clay lean with clay, sand sand in varies places and to Vel consistency decreasing y soft, stiff depth to with typically ve:y with compressibility potential), potential, load Negligible bearing comparatively low to iovv to moderate (sett!ernei capacity swell low it About in 7, borings 29, 17 to 33 TB and 35 -1, feet 4, 36 Sandy sar silty. id, clayey lean with clay intermittent sand to lenses clayey Very stiff/very medium soft loose to dense very to comparatively Negligible to moderate (sett!eme,it capacity swell compressibility low potentf potential, load u), bearing low About in bottom borings 8, 81/2 extendse of TB -36 to TB 26 -7 boring to feet and S:Ity, clayey sand Loose swell Judged low potential, load to bearing have negligible comparatively capacity Extended building/structure borings boring of to all except TB oottom -36 Clays amounts Sandstone/SILTSTONE bedrock; one/SI bedrock of varying LTS sand T ONE and Weathered hard to very low Judged to high swell load to potential, have bearing negligible moderate capacity to Conditions encountered at each boring location are indicated on the individual boring logs shown in the Exploration Results section and are attached to this report. Stratification boundaries on the boring logs represent the approximate location of changes in soil/bedrock types; in situ, the transition between materials may be gradual. Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable 4 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed FedEx Facility ■ Town of Mead, Weld County, Colorado July 26, 2018 • Terracon Project No. 22185003 Groundwater Conditions lierracon GeoReport The boreholes were observed while drilling and after completion for the presence and level of groundwater/perched water. In addition, delayed water levels were also obtained in the borings. The water levels observed in the boreholes can be found on the boring logs in Exploration Results, and are summarized below. Prr Boring Number 1 Approximate Groundwater Shortly (feet) after During Depth Drilling to or Approximate Groundwater Days after (feet) Drilling Depth 8 to 12 to Approximate of Days Groundwater after Drilling Elevation 8 to (feet) 12 TB -1 29 13 4946.6 TB -2 24 14% 4943.6 TB -3 None encountered 16 4944.1 TB -4 171/2 161/2 4943.0 TB -5 23 14% 4948.7 TB -6 24 17 4943.6 TB -7 18 181/2 4946.4 TB -8 None encountered 17 4947.2 TB -9 28 10 4959.8 TB -10 None encountered 14 4953.5 TB -11 29 16 4950.1 TB -12 18 141/2 4939.7 TB -13 None encountered 15 4939.2 TB -14 28 151/2 4940.8 TB -15 14% 14 4940.0 TB -16 11 7 -- TB-17 8 8 -- TB-18 None encountered 8 -- TB-19 None encountered 8 -- TB-20 None encountered Dry cave-in at 6 -- TB-21 None encountered Dry cave-in at 8 -- TB-22 None encountered 8 -- TB-23 None encountered 81/2 -- TB-24 None encountered Dry cave-in at 8'/2 -- TB-25 9 8 -- TB-26 None encountered Dry cave-in at 4 -- Responsive ■ Resourceful • Reliable 5 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed FedEx Facility • Town of Mead, Weld County, Colorado July 26, 2018 • Terracon Project No. 22185003 lierracon 1GeoRepo� ill* 6: Boring Number Approximate Groundwater Shortly (feet) after During Depth Drilling to or Approximate Groundwater Days after (feet) Drilling Depth 8 to 12 to Approximate of Days Groundwater after Drilling Elevation 8 to (feet) 12 TB -27 None encountered Dry cave-in at 8 -- TB-28 None encountered Dry cave-in at 8 -- TB-29 14 131/2 4940.3 TB -30 18 16 4942.2 TB -31 13 121/2 4945.0 TB -32 9 8 4948.4 TB -33 13 Dry cave-in at 7 4937.6 2 TB -34 None encountered 141/2 4935.5 TB -35 20 12 4934.5 TB -36 13 Dry cave-in at 8'/2 4931.6 2 1 B-37 None encountered Dry cave-in at 9 -- TB-38 None encountered Dry cave-in at 9 -- _; B-39 None encountered Dry c.-;?ve-in at 8',z - - TB -40 None encountered Dry cave-in at 9 -- TB-41 None encountered 8 -- 1. Below ground surface Approximate elevation of groundwater shortly after completion of drilling These observations represent short-term groundwater conditions at the time of and shortly after the Field exploration, and may not be indicative of other times, or at other locations. Our experience indicates groundwater levels, for a given year, are typically highest in early to late summer. Groundwater/perched water levels can and should be expected to fluctuate in response to site development and with varying seasonal and weather conditions, irrigation demands on or adjacent to the site and with fluctuations in nearby water features. Therefore, groundwater levels during construction or at other times in the future may be higher or lower than the levels indicated on the boring logs. Zones of perched and/or trapped groundwater, where not already present, may also occur at times in the subsurface soils overlying bedrock, on top of the bedrock surface or within permeable fractures in the bedrock materials. The location and amount of perched water is dependent upon several factors, including hydrologic conditions, type of site development, irrigation demands on or adjacent to the site, fluctuations in nearby water features, seasonal and weather conditions. Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable 6 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed FedEx Facility ■ Town of Mead, Weld County, Colorado July 26, 2018 ■ Terracon Project No. 22185003 lierracon TGeoRepori Fluctuations in groundwater/perched water levels can best be determined by implementation of a groundwater monitoring plan. Such a plan would include installation of groundwater monitoring wells, and periodic measurement of groundwater levels over a sufficient period of time. The possibility of groundwater level fluctuations and development of perched water should be considered when developing the design and construction plans for the project. In particular, site grading should be planned and designed to avoid excessive cuts where shallow water is known to exist, and also in areas where such grading would create shallow water conditions. GEOTECHNICAL OVERVIEW Based on geotechnical conditions encountered in our test borings, the site appears suitable for the proposed construction from a geotechnical point of view provided certain precautions and design and construction recommendations presented in this report are followed. We have identified a number of geotechnical conditions that could impact design, construction and performance of the building and other site improvements. These include comparatively shallow groundwater/perched water at some locations on the site, lower strength soils with increasing depth and when approaching and below groundwater, and fill induced settlement from placement of deeper site grading fills. These conditions will require particular attention in project planning, design and during construction and are discussed in greater detail in the following sections. Groundwater/Perched Water Comparatively shallow groundwater/perched water is present at some locations on this site. In particular, shallowest water levels were typically found on the northern and western parts of the site (vicinity of borings TB -9, 16, 17, 18, 22, 23 and 25), where water was typically measured at depths of about 7 to 81/2 feet below existing ground surface. Localized areas of shallow water were also found in the southeast corner of the site (vicinity of borings TB -32 and 41) and could be encountered at other locations on the site. Site grading should be planned and designed to avoid excessive cuts where shallow water is known to exist, and also in areas where such grading would create shallow water conditions in order to reduce impacts of dewatering and unstable subgrades. Normally, we recommend final site grades be established at least 4 feet, and preferably more, above the level of water. If deeper cuts are unavoidable, installation of subsurface drain systems will likely be needed and subgrade stabilization/improvement should be anticipated and budgeted for. Fill Induced Settlement Preliminary grading plans indicate cuts on the order of about 2 to 3 feet and fill placement on the order of about 6 to 7 feet are planned for the northern one-half of the service center building, while fill placement on the order of about 6 to 15 feet is planned for the southern one-half of the service center building. Fill placement in pavement areas on the southern part of the site will range from about 5 to 10 feet. Furthermore, we assume site grading fill will consist of on -site clay soils or import Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 7 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed FedEx Facility • Town of Mead, Weld County, Colorado July 2.6, 2018 a Terracon Project No. 22185003 lierracon GeoRepoit fill having similar or better engineering properties than the on -site soils. If final grading varies from what is described above, we should be contacted to confirm and/or modify our recommendations. The fill layer itself will experience some self -weight compression/settlement as well as induce settlement of the underlying clay soils. Self -weight settlement of the fill layer could be reduced, but not eliminated, by using select imported sand -gravel soils rather than the on -site clays and a high level of compaction. Based on consolidation test results and placement of about 6 to 15 feet of fill, we estimate site settlement could be on the order of about 2 to 4 inches. To reduce the impact of fill induced settlement, shallow foundations, floor slabs and pavements should not be placed on deeper fills until the majority of settlement has occurred. Correlated coefficient of consolidation values based on index properties of the clay soils suggest most of the settlement should occur within about 3 to 6 months after completion of fill placement. Timing of settlement is very difficult to anticipate because of the irregular subsurface conditions on the site and large number of variables. Consequently, the time for settlement to occur may be more or less than anticipated. Therefore, we recommend a monitoring program be implemented to determine when settlement induced from site grading fill is substantially complete. This should be taken into account in the construction sequencing and the design and construction of shallow foundations, floor slabs and pavements supported on deeper site grading fill. Site grading fill should be placed as soon as possible in the construction scheduleor even better yet, Es a separate earthwork contract well in advance of actual building construction. Mere are a number of options that could be considered to reduce the impact of fill induced settlement on the proposed development. Among others, this might include changing the orientation and/or relocating the building footprint on the site H order to reiuue the amount of fill required and to position the building over more favorable subsurface conditions. Deep foundations (drilled piers or helical piles bearing in bedrock) along with a structural floor supported independent of the ground could also be considered to mitigate the impact of fill induced settlement. However, deep bedrock (33 to greater than 40 feet) within the current building footprint would require long pier/pile lengths at some locations. We are available to discuss these options in greater detail upon your request. EARTHWORK The following presents recommendations for site preparation, excavation, subgrade preparation and placement of engineered fills on the project. Recommendations include critical quality criteria as necessary to render the site in the state considered in our geotechnical engineering evaluation for foundations, floor slabs and pavements. Earthwork on the project should be observed and evaluated by Terracon. The evaluation of earthwork should include observation and testing of engineered fill, subgrade preparation, foundation bearing soils, and other geotechnical conditions exposed during the construction of the project. Responsive • Resourceful ■ Reliable 8 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed FedEx Facility • Town of Mead, Weld County, Colorado July 26, 2018 • Terracon Project No. 22185003 Site Preparation lierracon 1GeoRepori Site preparation should commence with removal of existing vegetation, topsoil and any loose, soft, or otherwise unsuitable material from the proposed construction areas. Stripped materials consisting of vegetation and organic materials should be wasted from the site, or used to re - vegetate landscaped areas or exposed slopes after completion of grading operations. Comparatively shallow water and lower strength clay soils are present at on this site. The impact of low strength soils will likely affect site grading, pavement construction and other construction activities to varying degrees. The clay soils are susceptible to disturbance and loss of support u nder repeated construction traffic and can lead to "pumping" soils and unstable subgrade during earthwork and other construction activities. Stabilization of poor subgrades will likely be needed during construction, particularly for cut areas and excavations approaching and below the level of groundwater. Consequently, Terracon recommends a contingency be provided in the construction budget to stabilize and correct weak/unstable soils. Although evidence of existing fills or underground facilities such as grease pits, septic tanks, cesspools, existing foundations and basements was not observed during the site reconnaissance, such features could be encountered during construction. If unexpected fills or underground facilities are encountered, such features should be removed and the excavation thoroughly cleaned. Terracon should observe the excavation prior to backfill placement and/or construction. Exposed surfaces should be free of mounds and depressions that could prevent uniform compaction. Following completion of stripping and rough grading but prior to placement of new fill the exposed ground should be scarified, moisture conditioned as needed and re -compacted. The subgrade should then be proof -rolled to help delineate weak or disturbed areas at or near the ground surface. Unsuitable areas should be improved by moisture adjustment and compaction or by undercutting and placement of suitable compacted fill. Fill Material Types On -site clay soils free of vegetation, organic matter and other unsuitable materials or low volume change import materials approved by Terracon may be used as fill/backfill material on the site. Bedrock materials (if encountered) should be broken down and processed to a "soil -like" consistency, with no particles greater than 3 inches in size. The earthwork contractor should e xpect mechanical processing of the bedrock materials will be needed to meet these requirements. In general, imported materials meeting the properties presented below should be acceptable for u se on the site. However, imported soils should be evaluated and approved by the geotechnical engineer prior to delivery to the site. Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 9 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed FedEx Facility ■ Town of Mead, Weld County, Colorado July 26, 2018 ■ Terracon Project No. 22185003 lierracon GeoRepoft Gradation/Property Percent Finer (ASTM D422) by Weight 3 -inch 100 No. 4 Sieve 50 to 100 No. 200 Sieve 50 (max.) ■ Liquid (LL) 35 (max.) Limit • Plasticity Index (PI) 15 (max.) • Maximum Volumetric Expansion1 (%) 1 1. Measured on a sample compacted to about 95 percent of the ASTM D698 maximum dry density at about optimum water content. The sample is confined under a 250 psf surcharge load and inundated with water. Other import fill material types may be suitable or appropriate for use on the site depending upon proposed application and location on the site and could be tested and approved for use on a case - by -case basis. Compaction Requirements Str=ictural and general fill/backfill should meet the following compaction requirements. Item Description ■ 9 to 12 -inches or less in loose thickness when heavy, used self-propelled compaction equipment is Fill Lift Thickness ■ 4 to 6 inches in loose thickness when hand - guided compactor) equipment is used (i.e. jumping jack or plate 1 • At depth least 5.8 95% feet) of ASTM D698 (for fill/backfill compaction f?equirements ■ At fill/backfill least 98% of > 8 ASTM feet) D698 (for rtion ortion of po Moisture Content On -Site or Import 0 to 4-3% of the optimum content as moisture Cohesive Soils2 (Lean Clay and determined by the standard Proctor test -1 to +2% of the optimum moisture content in Claystone/Siltstone Bedrock) pavement areas 2 -2 to +2% of the optimum moisture content as Moisture Content On -Site or Import Sands determined by the standard Proctor test Engineered fill should be placed and compacted in horizontal lifts, using equipment and procedures that will produce recommended moisture contents and densities throughout the lift. A construction disc or other suitable processing equipment will be needed to thoroughly process the materials and to aid in achieving uniform moisture content throughout the fill. Responsive ■ Resourceful • Reliable 10 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed FedEx Facility • Town of Mead, Weld County, Colorado July 26, 2018 • Terracon Project No. 22185003 lierracon TGeoRepoft 2. The contractor should expect some moisture adjustment and processing of the site soils or import materials will be needed prior to or during compaction operations. In particular. some of clay soils appear to have in - place moisture content considerably above the soil's optimum moisture content. The contractor should expect moisture adjustment of these soils will be needed prior to or during backfilling operations. Spreading and drying should be anticipated in order to bring the soils into working moisture ranges for proper compaction. 3. Moisture conditioned cohesive soils (clays) should not be allowed to dry out. A loss of moisture within these materials will likely result in an increase of the materials swell potential. Subsequent wetting of these materials could result in undesirable movements. 4. Care should be taken during the fill placement process to avoid zones of dissimilar fill. Improvements constructed over varying fill types are at a higher risk of differential movement compared to improvements over a uniform fill zone. Slopes For new slopes in compacted fill or cut areas where saturation of the slopes will not occur. we suggest slopes of 3H:1V (horizontal to vertical), or less. Use of flatter slopes of 4H:1V (horizontal to vertical) is preferable to reduce erosion and maintenance problems. Some local raveling and/or surface sloughing may occur on slopes constructed at this angle until vegetation is re-established. If saturated or steeper slopes and/or slopes over about 12 feet in height are anticipated, o r if structures or other surcharge loads will be located within a distance of the slope height from the crest of the slope, the slopes should be evaluated for stability on an individual basis. The face of all slopes should be compacted to the minimum specifications described above. Ideally, fill slopes should be over -built and trimmed to compacted soil. Slopes should be revegetated as soon as possible to reduce the potential for erosion problems. Seeded slopes should be protected with erosion mats until the vegetation is established. Surface drainage is critical to performance of slopes and should be designed, constructed and maintained to direct water away from slope faces and to prevent ponding adjacent to the crest or toe of the slope. Excavation and Utility Trench Construction We believe the clay soils encountered in our exploratory borings can be excavated with conventional excavation equipment. Excavation performed remotely with track hoes or other low ground pressure (LGP) excavation equipment may be needed at some locations to reduce subgrade pumping and destabilization of bottom of excavations. Excavation into bedrock, if required, is anticipated to be comparatively difficult and may require the use of large rippers or other specialized heavy-duty rock excavation equipment in order to advance excavations. Based on our experience in the area, we do not believe drilling and blasting will be required for excavations extending about 5 feet or less into bedrock. The means and methods for bedrock excavation should be evaluated and determined by the excavation contractor. Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 11 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed FedEx Facility • Town of Mead, Weld County, Colorado July 26, 2018 • Terracon Project No. 22185003 lierracon GeoReport Groundwater seepage should be anticipated in excavations greater than about 7 to 8 feet below e xisting grades at some locations on the site (primarily on the north and west sides of the property). Where water is penetrated in excavations, some method of temporary dewatering will be needed for proper construction. Dewatering should continue through the excavation, construction and backfilling operations to ensure proper construction. Where excavations penetrate the groundwater for only a shallow depth, it will probably be possible to dewater by sloping the excavation to isolated sumps and pumps. Where excavations penetrate the groundwater for a significant depth, more extensive dewatering methods may be needed for effective dewatering and groundwater management. Trench excavations should be made with sufficient working space to permit construction including backfill placement and compaction. Trench backfill should consist of the on -site clay soil, properly processed bedrock or approved imported materials. Trench backfill should be placed and compacted as described under Compaction Requirements. It is strongly recommended a representative of the geotechnical engineer provide tull-time observation and compaction testing of trench backfill within building and pavement areas. Underground piping within or near the proposed structure should be designed and constructed so deviations in alignment do not result in breakage or distress. Utility knockouts in grade beams should be oversized to accommodate differential movements. The individual contractor(s) is responsible for designing and constructing stable, temporary e xcavations in order to maintain stability of excavation sides and bottom as well as any adjacent structures, utilities and pavements. Excavations should be sloped or shored in the interest of ,.�fety rollowirg vocal and federal regulations, including current Occupational Safety and Haalth Administration (OSHA) excavation and trench safety standards. If any excavation extends to a depth greater than 20 feet, OSHA regulations require the side slopes be designed by a professional engineer. As a safety measure, it is suggested vehicles and soil piles be kept to a minimum lateral distance from the crest of the slope equal to no less than the slope height. E Yposed slope faces should be protected against The elements. The soils to be penetrated by the proposed excavations may vary significantly across the site. The preliminary soil classifications are based solely on the materials encountered in widely spaced exploratory test borings. The contractor should verify similar conditions exist throughout the proposed area of excavation. If different subsurface conditions are encountered at the time of construction, the actual conditions should be evaluated to determine any excavation modifications n ecessary to maintain safe conditions. Grading and Drainage Proper drainage and surface water management is important to the performance of foundations, floor slabs, pavements and other site improvements. The following recommendations are Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable 12 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed FedEx Facility • Town of Mead, Weld County, Colorado July 26, 2018 • Terracon Project No. 22185003 lierracon GeoReport considered good practice for any site and should be implemented where applicable and/or to the extent possible. Grades must be adjusted to provide positive drainage away from the buildings, pavements and other site improvements during construction and maintained throughout the life of the proposed facility. Infiltration of water into utility or foundation excavations must be prevented during construction. Landscaped irrigation adjacent to the foundation system should be minimized. Plants placed close to foundation walls should be limited to those with low moisture requirements. The importance of proper irrigation practices cannot be over emphasized. Irrigation should be limited to the minimum amount needed to maintain vegetation; application of more water will increase likelihood of soil movements. We recommend minimum constructed slopes of about 6 inches in the first 10 feet (5 percent slope) in landscaped areas around the buildings, where practical. The ground surface should be sloped in such a manner that water will not pond between or adjacent to structures and other site improvements. Concrete curbs and sidewalks may "dam" surface runoff adjacent to the building and disrupt proper flow. Use of "chase" drains or weep holes at low points in the curb should be considered to promote proper drainage. Backfill against foundations, exterior walls and in utility and sprinkler line trenches should be well compacted and free of construction debris to reduce moisture infiltration. Some settlement of wall backfill should be expected even if properly compacted. Areas where backfill has settled should be repaired and re -graded immediately to maintain proper slope away from the foundation. Flatwork and pavements will be subject to post construction movement. Maximum grades practical should be used for paving and flatwork to prevent areas where water can pond. Where paving or flatwork abuts the structure, care should be taken that joints are properly sealed and maintained to prevent the infiltration of surface water. Planters located adjacent to the structure should be self-contained. Sprinkler mains and spray heads should not be installed or allowed to discharge within 5 feet of foundation walls. Roof drains should discharge on pavements or be extended away from the structure well beyond the limits of the backfill zone through the use of splash blocks or downspout extensions. Downspouts and extensions should be monitored and maintained in good working condition. Generally speaking, downspouts should not be buried and extended below grade, as these systems can be difficult to monitor and maintain. Water permitted to pond near or adjacent to the perimeter of the structure (either during or post - construction) can result in higher soil movements than those discussed in this report. As a result, Responsive • Resourceful ■ Reliable 13 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed FedEx Facility • Town of Mead, Weld County, Colorado July 26, 2018 • Terracon Project No. 22185003 lierracon GeoReport estimations of potential movement described in this report cannot be relied upon if positive drainage is not obtained and maintained, and water is allowed to infiltrate the fill and/or subgrade. After building construction and prior to project completion, we recommend verification of final grading be performed to document that positive drainage, as described in this section, has been achieved. Maintenance of surface drainage is imperative subsequent to construction and becomes the responsibility of the owner. Earthwork Construction Considerations The clay soils on this site are susceptible to disturbance and loss of strength under repeated construction traffic, particularly for cut areas and excavations approaching and below the level of groundwater. Consequently, "pumping" soils and unstable subgrades cou;d deveiop during earthwork and other construction activities. Based on the subsurface conditions, some soil improvement and stabilization should be anticipated and budgeted for this project. The use of low ground pressure (LGP) or lightweight earth moving equipment or remotely operated equipment, such as a track hoes, would be beneficial to perform cuts and reduce subgrade disturbance. Where possible, evei y effort should be made to minimize heavy construction traffic for lower strengin soil areas on the site. If unstable or soft ground conditions develop during earthwork or other construction activities, some method of soil improvement or stabilization will be needed prior to fill olaceme, ;t and/or foundation, floor slab or pavement construction. There are a number of stabilization methods that can be used to improve the subgrade and depend, in part, on the extent and severity of the unstable sot's exposed durh g construction as well as other factors. For minor stability iss�.e scarifying, moisture conditioning and recompaction may be effective. For areas of more severe instability, mechanical stabilization with an appropriate thickness of select import granular fill and/or geogrid would be appropriate. If large areas require stabilization, chemical treatment of the soils may be an effective alternative. In any event, we feel the appropriate method and level of stabilization should be evaluated and can best be determined on a case -by -case basis during construction once the entire subgrade and overall conditions are exposed. We are available to provide specific stabilization recommendations during construction upon request. The subgrade should be evaluated by a Terracon representative upon completior of filling operations. Once fill is placed and the subgrade is prepared, it is important measures be planned and taken to reduce drying of the near surface materials. If the fill dries excessively prior to foundation, floor slab or pavement construction, then it will be necessary to rework the upper, drier materials just prior to construction. Likewise, completed subgrades that have become saturated, frozen, disturbed or altered by construction activity should be restored to the conditions recommended in this report. Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable 14 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed FedEx Facility • Town of Mead, Weld County, Colorado July 26, 2018 • Terracon Project No. 22185003 Construction Observation and Testing lierracon GeoRe�&?t The earthwork efforts should be monitored under the guidance of Terracon. Monitoring should include documentation of adequate removal of vegetation and top soil, proof -rolling and mitigation of areas delineated by the proof -roll to require mitigation. Each lift of compacted fill should be tested, evaluated, and reworked as necessary until approved by the Geotechnical Engineer prior to placement of additional lifts. In areas of foundation excavations, the bearing subgrade should be evaluated under the guidance of Terracon. In the event unanticipated conditions are encountered, we should prescribe mitigation options. In addition to the documentation of the essential parameters necessary for construction, the continuation of Terracon into the construction phase of the project provides the continuity to maintain our evaluation of subsurface conditions, including assessing variations and associated design changes. SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS Considering the size and type of construction planned and the subsurface conditions encountered in our test borings, we believe spread footings bearing on approved native clay soils and/or properly compacted engineered fill can be used for support of the proposed buildings and other lightly loaded structures provided ample time is allowed for settlement/compression of the site grading fill and underlying native soils before constructing foundations. If the site has been prepared in accordance with the requirements noted in Earthwork and other appropriate sections of the report, the following design parameters are applicable for shallow spread footings. Spread Footing Design Recommendations Item Description Bearing Material Approved native clay engineered soils or properly fill compacted Maximum Allowable Soil Bearing Pressure 1 2,000 psf Minimum Dimensions Isolated Column Strip Footing 24 inches 16 inches Minimum for Frost Embedment Protection ri Below Finished Grade 36 inches Responsive • Resourceful ■ Reliable 15 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed FedEx Facility a Town of Mead, Weld County, Colorado July 26, 2018 • Terracon Project No. 22185003 lierracon GeoReport Item Description Estimated Based on Assumed Post -Construction Structural Movement Loads 3 About movement 1 -inch on total the movement order movement. of about and 1/2 to differential % of total Ultimate Passive Pressure 4 275 psf/ft Ultimate Coefficient of Sliding Friction ` 0.32 times the vertical dead load The allowable soil bearing pressure applies to dead loads plus design live load conditions and is the maximum pressure that should be transmitted to the bearing soils in excess of the mirimum surrounding overburden pressure at the footing base elevation. Assumes soft/loose soils or otherwise unsuitable bearing conditions, if encountered, will be undercut and replaced with properly compacted engineered fill. For perimeter footings and footings beneath unheated areas. Interior column pads in heated areas should bear at least 12 inches below the adjacent grade (or the top of the floor slab) for confinement of the bearing materials and to develop the recommended bearing pressure. Foundation movement will depend upon variations within the subsurface soil profile, structuri loading conditions, embedment depth of footings, thickness of compacted fill, and the quality of the earthwork operations. Movement estimates are based on assumed structural loads and resulting foundation geometry and assume that ample Ume has beer allowed for site sP tlement to occur prior to foundatio;' construction. If actual foundation loads vary significantly from those assumed, we should be contacted to review our recommendations. Additional foundation movements could occur if surface water infiltrates the foundation soils; therefore, proper drainage away from the foundation systems should be provided in the !final design, during construction ai ;d maintained throughout the life of the structure. 4. The sides of the excavation for spread footings must be nearly vertical and the concrete should he placed neat against these vertical faces or backill must be compacted to at least 95 percent of the stanear CI Proctor maximui -n dry density for the passive earth pressure value to be valid. Passive pressure requires movement to generate the resistance and should only be used when movement is tolerable anc the soil is well compacted and will not he removed. The passive resistance and friction factor are ultimate values. As such, appropriate factors of safety should be applied. coatings should be proportioned to reduce differential foundation movement. Proportioning on the basis of relative constant dead -load pressure can provide a means to reduce differential movement between adjacent footings. Footings, foundations, and masonry walls should be detailed and reinforced as necessary to reduce the potential for distress caused by differential foundation movement. The use of joints at openings or other discontinuities in masonry walls (if any) is recommended. Spread Footing Construction Considerations If low strength soils, poorly compacted fill or otherwise unsuitable bearing soils are encountered at the base of the planned footing excavation, the excavation should be extended deeper to suitable soils, and the footings could bear directly on these soils at the lower level or on lean concrete backfill placed in the excavations. This is illustrated on the sketch below. Responsive • Resourceful ■ Reliable 16 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed FedEx Facility m Town of Mead, Weld County, Colorado July 26, 2018 • Terracon Project No. 22185003 DESIGN FOOTING LEVEL •a • • • • RECOMMENDED 0-'--` EXCAVATION i EVFI i LEAN CONCRETE LEAN CONCRETE BACKFILL NOTE: EXCAVATIONS ARE SHOWN VERTICAL HOWEVER, THE SIDEWALLS SHOULD BE SLOPED AS NECESSARY FOR SAFETY lierracon GeoReport Over -excavation for structural fill placement below footings (if needed) should be conducted as shown below. The over -excavation should be backfilled up to the footing base elevation, with on - site clay soils or approved import materials placed, as recommended in the Earthwork section. DESIGN FOOTING LEVEL 0 _ 2130 RECOMMENDED • EXCAVATION LEVEL=aTTt=ITt OVER -EXCAVATION BACKFILL ZONE NOTE: EXCAVATIONS ARE SHOWN VERTICAL. HOWEVER, THE SIDEWALLS SHOULD BE SLOPED AS NECESSARY FOR SAFETY • • a • • • • a 2/3D STRUCTURAL FILL - ir- The base of foundation excavations should be free of water and loose/soft soil prior to concrete placement. Concrete should be placed soon after excavating to reduce bearing soil disturbance. Care should be taken to prevent wetting or drying of the bearing materials during construction. Excessively wet or dry material or any loose/disturbed material in the bottom of the footing excavations should be removed/reconditioned before foundation concrete is placed. As noted in Earthwork, completed foundation excavations should be observed and evaluated by a representative of Terracon well in advance of forming footings and placement of reinforcing steel to confirm satisfactory bearing materials are present and subsurface conditions are consistent with those encountered in our borings. If the soil conditions encountered differ significantly from those presented in this report, supplemental recommendations will be required. Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 17 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed FedEx Facility • Town of Mead, Weld County, Colorado July 26, 2018 • Terracon Project No. 22185003 SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS Code Used 2015 International Building Code (IBC) I lierracon 7GeoReport Site Classification D 1. In general accordance with the 2015 International Building Code, which refers to ASCE 7, Chapter 20 (Table 20.3-1 of ASCE 7-10). IBC Site Class is based on the average characteristics of the upper 100 feet of the subsurface profile. 2. The deepest boring for this project extended to a maximum depth of approximately 40 feet and this seismic site class definition considers that similar soil/bedrock conditions continue below the maximum depth of the subsurface exploration. FLOOR SLABS Swell -consolidation tests indicate the native r:'ay sons likely to influence floor slab performance on this site typically have low swell potential at in -place moisture content and density. Engineered fill consisting of the on -site clay soils and/or import materials having similar or better properties is expected to have negligible to low swell potential provided it is placed and compacted as recommended in Earthwork. Based on anticipated grading we expect native clay soils and/or engineered fill tested and approved by Terracon will support building floor slabs. Based on this data and our experience, we believe conventional slab -on -grade construction can be used on this site provided ample time is allowed for settlement/compression of the site grading fill and underlying native soils before constructing floor slabs. All slabs -on -grade undergo some movement. \Ne ir'lieve risk of movement is low for the soil/bedrock conditions encountered on this site and estimate settlement/heave of slabs -on -grade constructed on properly prepared subgrade or engineered fill on the order of about 1 inch. Where slab movement cannot be accented or must oe reduced, we are available to discuss floor movement mitigation techniques upon your request. Floor Slab Design Recommendations Item Floor Slab Support Description 12 -inch zone of moisture conditioned and compacted subgrade. Aggregate base course layer over compacted subgrade for heavy floor loading. Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable 18 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed FedEx Facility • Town of Mead, Weld County. Colorado July 26, 2018 • Terracon Project No. 22185003 Item Modulus of Subgrade Reaction lierracon GeoReport Description For limited area loads or concentrated/point loads placed directly on slabs: • 100 pounds per square inch per inch (psi/in) for slabs supported on compacted subgrade consisting of the on -site clay soils. • 150 psi/in for slabs supported on at least 8 inches of compacted aggregate base course. For heavy floor loading, we recommend the provision of a minimum 8 -inch layer of compacted aggregate base course below the slab. Slab reinforcement and thickness should be designed by a qualified engineer based on actual loads imposed and on intended slab use. We recommend the following precautions be observed where slabs -on -grade are used. These precautions will not eliminate slab movement. Rather, they tend to reduce damage when movement occurs. Additional floor slab design and construction recommendations are as follows: • Positive separations and/or isolation joints should be provided between slabs and foundations, columns or utility lines to allow free vertical movement. This detail can reduce cracking when movement of the slab occurs. Non-bearing partition walls placed on the floor slab (if any) should be designed acid constructed to allow some slab movement. ■ Plumbing and utilities that pass through slabs should be isolated from the slab and constructed with flexible couplings. Utilities, as well as electrical and mechanical equipment, should be constructed witn sufficient flexibility to allow for movement. • Frequent control joints should be provided in slabs to help control the location and extent of cracking in accordance with the American Concrete Institute (ACI). For additional recommendations refer to the ACI Design Manual. • The use of a vapor retarder should be considered beneath concrete slabs on grade that will be covered with wood, tile, carpet or other moisture sensitive or impervious coverings, or when the slab will support equipment sensitive to moisture. When conditions warrant the use of a vapor retarder/barrier, the slab designer should refer to ACI 302 and/or ACI 360 for procedures and cautions regarding the use and placement of a vapor retarder/barrier. • Other design and construction considerations, as outlined in the ACI Design and Construction Manuals, are recommended. Responsive ■ Resourceful • Reliable 19 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed FedEx Facility • Town of Mead, Weld County, Colorado July 26, 2018 • Terracon Project No. 22185003 Floor Slab Construction Considerations lierracon GeoReport Fill/backfill placed beneath slabs and next to foundation walls/grade beams should be moisture conditioned and compacted as described in the Earthwork section of this report. Soils loosened during excavation or other construction activities should be removed or recompacted as described in this report. Floor slabs should not be constructed on frozen subgrade. Once fill is placed and the floor slab subgrade is prepared, it is important measures be planned and taken to reduce drying of the near surface materials. If the fill dries excessively prior to building construction, then it will be necessary to rework the upper, drier materials just prior to installing floor slabs. On most project sites, site grading is generally accomplished early in the construction phase. However; as construction proceeds, the subgrade may be disturbed due to utility excavations, construction traffic, desiccation, rainfall, etc. As a result, the floor slab subgrade may not be suitable for placement of concrete and corrective action will be required. We recommend the area underlying the floor slab be evaluates and proof -rolled shortly before slab construction. Particular attention should be paid to foundation wall backfill and areas where backfilled trenches are located. Areas where unsuitable condiftns are located should be repaired by removing and replacing the affected material with properly compacted fill. Floor slab subgrade areas should be moisture conditioned and properly compacted to the recommendations in this report shortly before placement of the concrete. LATERAL EARTH PRESSURES Design Parameters We are not aware of any significant earth retaining structures for this project. However, we are providing design parameters should minor reinforced concrete retaining walls be included for site development. For purposes of evaluation, we have assumed around 5 feet, or less, of fill will be retained by the walls and backfill will consist of on -site lean clays. If taller walls, different type of backfill is used, or if other wall systems (such as modular block-geogrid reinforced backfill (MSE) walls) are planned, we should be contacted to review our data and the wall geometry to determine whether further field exploration and/or analysis is necessary to provide appropriate design criteria. Reinforced concrete retaining walls should be designed for lateral earth pressures imposed by the soil backfill. Earth pressures will be influenced by structural design of the walls, conditions of wall restraint, slope of the backfill surface and type, compaction and drainage of the backfill. Active Responsive ■ Resourceful • Reliable 20 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed FedEx Facility a Town of Mead, Weld County, Colorado July 26, 2018 • Terracon Project No. 22185003 lierracon GeoReort e arth pressure is commonly used for design of walls that allow some wall rotation and deflection. For walls that can deflect and rotate about the base, with top lateral movements of about ' to 1 percent of the wall height, lower "active" earth pressures could be considered for design. For restrained walls where negligible or very little rotation and deflection will occur, "at -rest" lateral e arth pressures should be used in the design. Reinforced concrete walls should be designed for lateral earth pressures at least equal to those indicated in the following table. Earth Conditions Pressure Backfill Soil Type Equivalent Fluid Density (pcf) Active (Ka) On -site lean clay 55 At -Rest (K0) On -site lean clay 75 Passive (Kr) On -site lean clay 275 P assive earth pressure and frictional resistance can be used to resist sliding and overturning. P assive resistance requires movement to generate the resistance. Passive resistance should only be used when movement is tolerable and the soil is well compacted and will not be removed. A value of 0.32 can be used as the ultimate coefficient of friction between concrete and the underlying n ative soil. The equivalent fluid densities and coefficient of friction presented above do not include a factor of safety. As such, appropriate factors of safety should be applied to these values. Furthermore, the e quivalent fluid densities do not include allowances for hydrostatic pressures, surcharge loading and sloping backfill. Retaining Wall Drainage Free -draining granular backfill should be used behind retaining walls to help relieve hydrostatic pressure and provide drainage. We recommend a free -draining gravel material with less than 5 percent fines (material passing the No. 200 sieve) be used for a zone within at least 1 -foot behind the walls. The drainage material should be tested and approved by our office prior to delivery to the site. The gravel zone behind the wall and wall backfill should be placed in thin, loose lifts and compacted. Heavy equipment should not operate within a distance closer than the exposed height of retaining walls to prevent lateral pressures more than those provided. Special precautions (e.g. bracing) should be taken to avoid over -stressing the walls during compaction. We recommend weep holes and/or installation of a drain pipe at the base of the free -draining backfill zone. If a drain is installed, it should consist of a minimum 4 -inch perforated rigid PVC pipe encased in free -draining gravel. The drain pipe should slope at least 1/2 percent to a positive Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable 21 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed FedEx Facility ■ Town of Mead, Weld County, Colorado July 26, 2018 • Terracon Project No. 22185003 lierracon GeoReport gravity outlet at either or both ends of the wall, or be connected to outfall more than 5 feet in front of the wall. As an alternative to free -draining granular fill, a pre -fabricated drainage structure may be used. A pre -fabricated drainage structure is a plastic drainage core or mesh which is covered with filter fabric to prevent soil intrusion, and is fastened to the wall prior to placing backfill. Where the backfill zone is not covered with pavement or flatwork, we recommend the backfill zone be capped with clay fill to reduce infiltration and conveyance of surface water through the wall backfill. In addition, surface drainage should be designed to direct water away from the wall and to prevent ponding adjacent to the wall. PAVEMENTS General Pavement Comments Pavement designs are provided for the traffic conditions and pavement life conditions as noted in Project Description and in the following sections of this report. Critical aspects of pavement performance are site preparation, surface/subsurface drainage and the use of quality paving materials. Pavement designs, noted in this section, must be applied to the site, which has been prepared as recommended in the Earthwork and following sections of the report. Subgrade Preparation Preliminary grading indicates cuts and fills in pavement areas will range from about 0 to 8 feet and about 0 to 10 feet, respectively. Deepest cuts are planned for the northeast and northwest parts of the site, while the deepest fills are planned along the southern border of the lot. To reduce the impact of fill induced settlement, pavements should not be placed on deeper fills until the majority of settlement has occurred. In addition, comparatively shallow groundwater/perched water is present at some locations on this site. In particular, shallowest water levels were typically found on the northern and western parts of the site (vicinity of borings TB -9, 16, 17, 18, 22, 23 and 25), where water was typically measured at depths of about 7 to 81/2 feet below existing ground surface. Site grading cuts should be avoided or limited to the extent practical for shallow water areas of the site in order to reduce impacts of dewatering and unstable subgrades. Normally, we recommend groundwater levels be maintained at least 4 feet below the pavement structure to increase subgrade performance and pavement life. If this separation cannot be achieved, installation of pavement subdrains will likely be needed and subgrade stabilization/improvement should be anticipated and budgeted for. Guidelines regarding stabilization are discussed in the Earthwork section of the report. Responsive ■ Resourceful • Reliable 22 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed FedEx Facility es Town of Mead, Weld County, Colorado July 26, 2018 r Terracon Project No. 22185003 lierracon GeoReport On most project sites, site grading is accomplished relatively early in the construction phase. Fills are placed and compacted in a uniform manner. However, as construction proceeds, excavations are made into these areas, rainfall, snowmelt and surface water saturates some areas, heavy traffic from concrete trucks and other delivery vehicles disturbs the subgrade and many surface irregularities are filled in with loose soils to improve trafficability on a temporary basis. As a result, the pavement subgrades, prepared early in the project, should be carefully evaluated as the time for pavement construction approaches. We recommend the moisture content and density of the top 12 inches of the subgrade be tested and evaluated and the pavement subgrades be proof -rolled shortly before actual paving operations. Areas not in compliance with the required ranges of moisture or density should be moisture conditioned and re -compacted. Particular attention should be paid to high traffic areas that were rutted and disturbed earlier and to areas where backfilled trenches are located. Areas where unsuitable conditions are located should be repaired by removing and replacing the materials with properly compacted fills or stabilized by other suitable means. Subgrade Soils Based on our boring data and anticipated grading, we expect moisture conditioned and compacted lean clays with varying amounts of sand or site grading fill comprised of soils having similar or better properties will support pavements. Testing indicates the subgrade materials classify as A-6 and A- 7-6 soils according to the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) classification system. AASHTO group indices of these soils ranged from 6 to 18. with an average group index of about 13. These subgrade materials have a 'CL" classification in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) methods. Soil classification test results, the R -value determined in the laboratory and our experience indicate the clay subgrade soils at the site offer poor pavement support. Pavement Design Considerations (Light -Duty Pavements) Information provided by the Client indicates traffic loads for light -duty pavements will be produced primarily by employee automobiles/pick-up trucks and occasional light delivery trucks. Trash trucks are not expected to access these areas. The following table summarizes the traffic information used for evaluating light -duty pavements for the project. Traffic Area (Light -Duty) Employee Parking Lot Traffic Type/Volume • 400 to 600 cars/pick-ups per day • Light delivery trucks on occasion 18 -kip EDLA 3to5 A performance period of 20 years was used to develop the total traffic used in thickness design. Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 23 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed FedEx Facility • Town of Mead, Weld County, Colorado July 26, 2018 ■ Terracon Project No. 22185003 lierracon GeoRepoit Traffic type and volume estimates and/or design EDLA values used to determine pavement thickness should be reviewed and approved by the owner and design team prior to commencement of paving operations. If heavier trucks or more frequent truck traffic will be present in light -duty pavement areas, this office should be provided with the information and allowed to review the pavement sections and provide supplemental recommendations if needed. The required total thickness for flexible pavements is dependent primarily upon the foundation soil or subgrade support characteristics and upon traffic loading conditions. In addition, a rigid pavement thickness was completed for light -duty pavements. Rigid pavement thickness is based on an evaluation of the Modulus of Subgrade Reaction of the soils (k -value), the Modulus of Rupture of the concrete, and other factors. The k -value of the subgrade soil was estimated by correlation to the laboratory test results and was adjusted to take into consideration variations in subgrade materials and changing support throughout the year. Pavement Thickness (Light -Duty Pavements) Light-D!!ty Pavement Section Thickness (inches) Traffic Area Alternative Asphalt Concrete 1 Aggregate Course Base 2 Concrete Portland Cement 3 Thickness Total (Employee Light Parking Duty Lot) AC + ABC 41/2 6 -- 101/2 AC 6 -- -- 6 PCC C -- -- 5'/2 5% Superpave asphalt mixturas wiun aggregates meeting CDOT Grading SG. S or SX specification is recommended for asphalt concrete (AC). Asphalt should be placed in maximum 21/2 to 3 -inch lifts (4 -inch max for SG) and compacted to a density of 92 to 96 percent of the maximum theoretical .tensity, determined in general accordance with ASTM D2041 (Colorado Procedure 51). Aggregate base course (ABC) should consist of a blend of sand and gravel which meets strict specifications for quality and gradation and should have an R -value of at least 70. Use of materials meeting Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) Class 5 or 6 specifications is recommended. ABC should be placed in maximum 6 --inch lifts and compacted to at least 95% of the standard Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D698/AASHTO T 99). 3. Modulus of rupture of 580 psi minimum. This is roughly equivalent to a 28 -day compressive strength of at least 4,000 psi. 4 -inch maximum slump and 5 to 7 percent entrained air, 6 -sack min. mix. Thickness recommendations are based on car traffic and occasional light delivery trucks only. As part of the layout design of the facility we recommend the designer use signs and preventive structures to restrict trash trucks and other heavy truck traffic from entering light -duty pavement areas of the site. Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable 24 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed FedEx Facility a Town of Mead, Weld County, Colorado July 26, 2018 • Terracon Project No. 22185003 lierracon ?ieoReporf Longitudinal and transverse joints should be provided as needed in concrete pavements for expansion/contraction and isolation. The location and extent of joints should be based upon the final pavement geometry. Sawed joints should be cut within 24 -hours of concrete placement. Joints should be sealed to prevent entry of foreign material and dowelled where necessary for load transfer. Pavement Design Considerations (Heavy -Duty Pavements) Information provided by the Client indicates traffic loads for heavy-duty pavements will be produced primarily by fully loaded semi -trucks. In addition, we assume light delivery trucks and trash removal/dumpster trucks. The following table summarizes the traffic information provided for evaluating heavy-duty pavements for the project. Traffic Area (Heavy -Duty) Drive Lanes/Truck Access Areas Traffic Type/Volume a 350 semi -trucks per day • Light delivery and trash trucks 18 -kip EDLA Rigid 1,100 Flexible 615 1. Information provided indicates semi -trucks will have GVW's of 72,000 pounds with 8,000 -pound front single axle loads and two (2) tandem axle loads in the rear of 32,000 pounds each. A performance period of 15 and 25 years for flexible (asphalt) and PCC (rigid) pavements, respectively, were used to develop the total traffic used in thickness design. We evaluated Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) pavement thickness for heavy-duty pavements using the American Concrete Institute (ACI) design methodology provided in ACI 330.2R-17 Guide for the Design and Construction of Concrete Site Paving for Industrial and [rucking Facilities and compared it to a traditional American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASTHO) 1993 pavement design approach. Based on the comparison, we believe the ACI design approach results in an unreasonably thin concrete pavement section for the expected truck traffic and subgrade conditions. Consequently, the heavy-duty pavement thickness for PCC (rigid) pavements presented in this report is based on AASHTO design procedures. Concrete Pavement Thickness (Heavy -Duty Pavements) Design parameters or other data used for determining PCC (rigid) pavement thickness for heavy- duty pavements are summarized in the following table. Pavement Design Parameter/Data (Rigid) Effective Modulus of Subgrade Reaction (k) Reliability Value 100 pci 85% Responsive • Resourceful ■ Reliable 25 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed FedEx Facility • Town of Mead, Weld County, Colorado July 26, 2018 • Terracon Project No. 22185003 lierracon GeoReport Pavement Design Parameter/Data (Rigid) Value Overall Standard Deviation (So) C.34 Design Serviceability Loss (APSI) 2.0 18 -kip Equivalent Daily Load Application (EDLA) 1.100 Design Period 25 years Total 18 -kip Equivalent Single Axle Loads (ESAL's) 10,037,500 Load Transfer Coefficient (J) 3.1 Drainage Coeffic ent 1.0 Based on the results of the thickness determination, at a minimum, we suggest the following typical pavement section and associated joint spacing for jointed plain concrete pavements (with dowels) for heavy-duty pavement areas of the site. Heavy -Duty PCC (Rigid) Pavement Section Thickness (inches) Portland Cement Aggregate Base Traffic Area Tatai Thi,- (nPa= Concrete with Dowels Course Heavy Duty (Drive Lar les/Truck Access 101 4 4 rt r2 Areas) 1 Concrete modulus of rupture of 580 psi minimum. This is roughly equivalent to a 28 --day co..-icressive strength of at least 4,000 psi. 4 -inch maximum slump and 5 to 7 percent entrained air, 6 -sack min. mix. 2. Aggregate base course (ABC) should consist of a blend of sand and gravel which meets strict t4H.:cifcatiuns for quality and gradation and should have an R -value of at least 70. Use o4 materials meeting Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) Class 5 or 6 specifications is recommended. ABC should be compacted to at least 98 of the standard Proc`or maximum dry density (ASTM D698/AASHTO T 99). Dowels will be required at all contraction and construction joints as shown in the 'ollowing 'able: Pavement Area Joint Contraction Maximum (feet) Spacing Construction Joint Contraction Joint Diameter Dowel (in) Dowel Length (in) Spacing Dowel (in) Diameter Dowel (in) Length Dowel (in) Spacing Dowel (in) Heavy- Duty 15 1'/2 18 12 1 22 12 The following comments should be considered in regards to concrete jointing: • Contraction (control) joints should be constructed in the rigid pavement in accordance with ACI 330.2R-17 requirements. Contraction joints should be 1/4 of the depth of the Responsive • Resourceful ■ rteliable 26 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed FedEx Facility • Town of Mead, Weld County, Colorado July 26, 2018 is Terracon Project No. 22185003 lierracon GeoReport concrete. and should be cut as soon as the concrete has hardened sufficiently to avoid raveling of the coarse aggregate. • Expansion (isolation) joints should be full depth and should only be used to isolate fixed objects abutting or within the pavement area. When they must be located in areas that encounter wheel and other loads, the pavement edges at the joint should be thickened by 2 inches. • All joints should be sealed in accordance with ACI 330.2R-17 • Tie bars are also recommended along the first longitudinal joint from the pavement edge to keep the outside slab from separating from the pavement. Dowels should not be placed closer than 12 inches to any intersecting joints. Asphalt Pavement Thickness (Heavy -Duty Pavements) Design parameters or other data used for determining flexible (asphalt) pavement thickness for heavy-duty pavements are summarized in the following table. Pavement Design Parameter/Data (Flexible) Value R -value (Determined in Laboratory) 12 Correlated Soil Resilient Modulus (MR) 3.300 psi Reliability 85% Overall Standard Deviation (S,}) 0.44 Design Serviceability Loss (APSI) 2.0 18 -kip Equivalent Daily Load Application (EDLA) 615 Design Period 15 years Total 18 -kip Equivalent Single Axle Loads (ESAL's) 3.367,125 Design Structura; Number (SN) 5.11 Pavement Strength Coefficient Layer Asphalt Concrete (AC) 0.44 Aggregate Base Course (ABC) 0.11 Using the values presented above, environmental criteria and other factors, the design structural number (SN) of the flexible pavement section was determined on the basis of the 1993 American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) design equation. Responsive • Resourceful ■ Reliable 27 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed FedEx Facility i Town of Mead, Weld County, Colorado July 26, 2018 ■ Terracon Project No. 22185003 lierracon 7GeoRepoH Heavy -Duty Flexible (Asphalt) Pavement Section Thickness (inches) Asphalt Aggregate Traffic Area Alternative 1 2 Total Thickness Concrete Base Course Heavy Duty AC + ABC 9 12 21 (Drive Lanes/Truck Access AC 12 -- 12 Areas) 3. Superpave asphalt mixtures with aggregates meeting CDOT Grading SG. S or SX specification is recommerded for asphalt concrete (AC). Asphalt should be placed in maximum 21/2 to 3 -inch lifts (4 -inch max for SG) and compacted to a density of 92 to 96 percent of the maximum theoretical density, determined in generai accordance with ASTM D2041 (Colorado Procedure 51). 4. Aggregate base course (ABC) should consist of a blend of sand and gravel which meets strict specifications for quality and gradation and should have an ft -value of at least 70. Use of materials meeting Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) Class 5 or 6 specifications is recommended. ABC should be placed in maximum 6 -inch lifts and compacted to at least 98% of the standard Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D698/AP,SHTO T 99). The pavement sections presented are based, in part, on design parameters selected by Terracon based on experience with similar projects and soils conditions and other information discussed in the report. Design parameters such as performance period, truck traffic type and frequency and numerous other [actors may vory with specific project requirements or design rethodo1oaies. Variation of these parameters may change the thickness of the pavement sections presented. Terracon is prepared to discuss the details of these parameters and their effects Gn pavement design and reevaluate pavement thickness as appropriate. Favernent Drainage Pavements shou'd be sloped to provide rapid drainage of surface water. Water allowed to pond on or adjacent to the pavements could saturate the subgrade and contribute to premature pavement deterioration. Collection and diversion of surface drainage away from paved areas is critical to satisfactory performance of pavements. Openings in pavement, such as landscape islands, are sources for water infiltration into surrounding pavements. Water collects in the islands and migrates into the surrounding subgrade soils thereby degrading support of the pavement. This is especially applicable for islands with raised concrete curbs, irrigated foliage, and low permeability near -surface soils. The civil design for pavements with these conditions should consider features to restrict or to collect and discharge excess water from the islands. Examples of features are edge drains connected to the storm water collection system or other suitable outlet and impermeable barriers preventing lateral migration of water such as a cutoff wall installed to a depth below the pavement structure. Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable 28 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed FedEx Facility Town of Mead, Weld County, Colorado July 26, 2018 • Terracon Project No. 22185003 Pavement Performance and Maintenance lierracon TGeoReporl Our experience indicates longitudinal cracking is common for asphalt pavements. The cracking normally occurs parallel to the interface between asphalt and concrete features such as curbs, gutters or drain pans and/or several feet in from pavement edges. The mechanism for this cracking is not fully understood, but seems to be most prevalent for expansive and/or cohesive subgrade soils. Distress of this type is likely to occur even if the subgrade has been properly prepared and the asphalt has been compacted properly. Pavement performance is affected by its surroundings. In addition to providing preventive maintenance, the civil engineer and other members of the design team should consider the following recommendations in the design and layout of pavements: • Site grading at a minimum 2 percent grade onto or away from the pavements • Install pavement drainage surrounding areas anticipated for frequent wetting • Install joint sealant and seal cracks immediately • Use low water -demand plantings and drip irrigation for landscaped areas • Seal all landscaped areas in, or adjacent to pavements or provide drains to reduce the risk of moisture migration to subgrade soils • Compaction of utility trenches for landscaped areas to the same criteria as the pavement sub g rade • Place compacted, low permeability backfill against the exterior side of curb and gutter • Place curb, gutter and/or sidewalk directly on subgrade soils rather than base course materials The pavement sections provided in this report represent minimum recommended thicknesses and, as such, periodic maintenance should be anticipated. Therefore, preventive maintenance should be planned and provided for through an on -going pavement management program. Preventive maintenance activities are intended to slow the rate of pavement deterioration. Preventive maintenance consists of both localized maintenance (e.g. crack and joint sealing and patching) and global maintenance (e.g. surface sealing). Preventive maintenance is usually the first priority when implementing a planned pavement maintenance program. Prior to implementing any maintenance, additional engineering observation is recommended to determine the type and extent of preventive maintenance. Even with periodic maintenance, some movements and related cracking may still occur and repairs may be required. Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable 29 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed FedEx Facility • Town of Mead, Weld County, Colorado July 26, 2018 • Terracon Project No. 22185003 lierracon GeoReport ADDITIONAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS Detention Pond We understand a water quality pond will be constructed on the west -central part of the site in the general vicinity of borings TB -23 and 25. Pond depth is not known at this time and is still under discussion. However, final depth will likely be limited by shallow water. Subsurface conditions in the pond area are anticipated to consist of 10 feet, or more, of lean clay with varying amounts of sand. Groundwater was encountered in the test borings at depths of about 8 to 81/2 feet below existing ground surface at the time of our field exploration. Based on index properties determined in the laboratory and our experience, we judge the clay soils in the vicinity of the pond to generally have poor infiltrative characteristics. If needed, we can perform percolation or other field tests to provide a better indication of soil infiltration rates. We are available to discuss this with you and could provide a fee for these additional services. We anticinate lower strength clays will be encountered in the area of the pond, particularly for excavations approaching and below the level of groundwater. Comparatively shallow groundwater (about 8 to 8% feet below ground surface) should also be expected in the area of the pond. These conditions will likely ccmplicate excavation and construction of the pond. In particular, excavation of the pond by conventional equipment (such as rubber tired front-end loaders or scrapers) may not be possible due to the low strength soils and it may be necessary to excavate deeper portions of the pond remotely with a track -hoe or other light-weighi excavation equipment. Because of shallow water conditions, we recommend limiting pond bottom depth as shallow as practical. Consideration should be given to constructing compacted earth berms to achieve required pond capacity rather than increasing depth of excavation. Pond construction should be completed "in the dry" and depending on final pond depth, temporary dewatering may be needed to excavate and properly construct the pond. Localized slopes enclosing the pond should be designed by a qualified Civil Engineer with erosion control and slope stability in mind. Generally speaking, side slopes should be placed on slopes of 3H:1V (horizontal to vertical), or less, to reduce erosion and maintenance problems. The side slopes should be seeded or protected from erosion by other means soon after completion of construction. If steeper slopes are required for pond construction, stability analyses should be completed to design the side slopes, or retaining walls or other earth retention systems should be provided. Exterior Slabs/Flatwork Sidewalks and other flatwork are normally constructed as slabs -on -grade where low swelling soils, such as those found on this site, are present. Performance of flatwork on low swelling soils Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable 30 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed FedEx Facility a Town of Mead, Weld County, Colorado July 26, 2018 • Terracon Project No. 22185003 lierracon TGeoReport can be erratic and these features may heave to some degree and crack when the underlying soils become elevated in moisture content or due to frost heave. Exterior slabs can be affected on all sites. In addition, compacted clay subgrade materials or existing clay soils may swell/compress or foundation wall backfill may consolidate with increasing moisture content; therefore, exterior slabs could heave or settle, resulting in cracking or vertical offsets. It is generally not feasible to eliminate the potential for movement of exterior flatwork. The potential for damage would be greatest where exterior slabs are constructed adjacent to the building or other structural elements. To reduce the potential for damage, we recommend: Exterior slabs be supported on carefully processed and moisture conditioned fill Strict moisture -density control during placement of fill/backfills Placement of effective control joints on relatively close centers and isolation joints between slabs and other structural elements Provision for adequate drainage in areas adjoining the slabs • Use of designs which allow free vertical movement between the exterior slabs and adjoining structural elements In those locations where movement of exterior slabs must be reduced or where there is low tolerance for movement (such as at building doors), consideration should be given to structurally supporting exterior flatwork on haunches. Soluble Sulfates Test Results (Concrete) Soluble sulfate concentrations were measured for representative samples of the soil/bedrock that will likely be in contact with project concrete. The sulfate concentrations measured in the samples varied from 0.006 to 0.19 percent. Sulfate concentrations of less than 0.1 percent indicate Class 0 exposure, while sulfate concentrations in the range of 0.1 to less than 0.2 percent indicate Class 1 exposure to sulfate attack for concrete in contact with the subsoils, according to the American Concrete Institute (ACI) Guide to Durable Concrete. For Class 1 sulfate exposure, ACI recommends the use of Type II cement (or equivalent) and a maximum water -cement ratio of 0.50. Foundation concrete should be designed in accordance with the provisions of the ACI Design Manual, Section 318, Chapter 4. Responsive ■ Resourceful • Reliable 31 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed FedEx Facility a Town of Mead, Weld County, Colorado July 26, 2018 • Terracon Project No. 22185003 GENERAL COMMENTS lierracon 7GeoReport As the project progresses, we address assumptions by incorporating information provided by the design team, if any. Revised project information that reflects actual conditions important to our services is reflected in the final report. The design team should collaborate with Terracon to confirm these assumptions and to prepare the final design plans and specifications. This facilitates the incorporation of our opinions related to implementation of our geotechnical recommendations. Any information conveyed prior to the final report is for informational purposes only and should n ot be considered or used for decision -making purposes. Our analysis and opinions are based upon our understanding of the project, the geotechnical conditions in the area, and the data obtained from our site exploration. Natural variations will occur between exploration point locations or due to the modifying effects of construction, weather and time. The nature and extent of such variations may not become evident unt l during or after construction. Terracon should be retained as the Geotechnical Engineer, where noted in the final report, to provide observation and testing services during pertinent construction phases. If ✓ ariations appear, we can provide further evaluation and supplemental recommendations. Ii variations are noted in the absence cf our observation and testing services on -site, we should be immediately notified so that we can provide evaluation and supplemental recommendations. Our scope of services does not include either specifically or by implication any environmental or oi0!cgical (e.g., mold, fungi. bacteria) assessment of the site or identification or irirev,-:nt!on of pollutants, hazardous materials or Condit ons. If the owner is concerned about the potential for such contami►1atU3n or pollution, other studies should be undertaken. Our services and any correspondence or collaboration through this system are intended for the sole benefit and exclusive use of our client for specific application to the project discussed and aye accomplished in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices with n o third party beneficiaries intended. Any third party access to services or correspondence is solely for information purposes to support the services provided by Terracon to our client. Reliance u pon the services and any work product is limited to our client, and is not intended for third parties. Any use or reliance of the provided information by third parties is done solely at their own risk. No warranties, either express or implied, are intended or made. Site characteristics as provided are for design purposes and not to estimate excavation cost. Any u se of our report in that regard is done at the sole risk of the excavating cost estimator as there may be variations on the site that are not apparent in the data that could significantly impact e xcavation cost. Any parties charged with estimating excavation costs should seek their own site characterization for specific purposes to obtain the specific level of detail necessary for costing. Site safety, and cost estimating including, excavation support, and dewatering requirements/design are the responsibility of others. If changes in the nature, design, or location of the project are planned, our conclusions and recommendations shall not be considered valid u nless we review the changes and either verify or modify our conclusions in writing. Responsive ■ Resourceful • Reliable 32 ATTACHMENTS EXPLORATION AND TESTING PROCEDURES SITE LOCATION AND EXPLORATION PLANS EXPLORATION RESULTS SUPPORTING INFORMATION Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed FedEx Facility • Town of Mead, Weld County, Colorado July 26, 2018 • Terracon Project No. 22185003 lrerracon GeoReport EXPLORATION AND TESTING PROCEDURES Field Exploration The initial field exploration (March 21 and 22, 2018) consisted of the following boring schedule. Number of Initial Borings Boring Depth (feet) Location 11 20 to 35 Within and office proposed building service footprint center 4 20 to 30 Within building proposed and fuel maintenance canopy areas 13 10to15 Proposed initial detention pavement pond areas and area After the initial field exploration was completed, we were informed the site layout and building/structure locations and orientation were revised. As a result, supplemental field exploration and laboratory testing was undertaken. Me supplemental field exploration (June 28, 2018) consisted of the following boring schedule. Number k of Borings Soreplemental Boring Depth (feet) Location 7 25 to 40 Within proposed building footprint service center 1 25 Within building proposed and fuel maintenance canopy areas 5 10 Proposed pavement areas Boring Layout and Elevations: The latitude and longitude coordinates of the boring locations were obtained by locating the borings in our GIS database and recording the values. The borings were then located in the field using a recreational grade GPS device. The accuracy of these coordinates is typically about +1- 25 feet. Approximate ground surface elevations at the building/structure boring locations were obtained by measurements with an engineer's level and rod from a temporary bench mark (TBM) shown on the Exploration Plan. The accuracy of boring locations and elevations should only be assumed to the level implied by the methods used. Subsurface Exploration Procedures: Borings were advanced with a CME-45 or CME-55 truck - mounted drilling rig, utilizing 4 -inch diameter solid stem auger. A geotechnical engineer or engineering geologist recorded lithologic logs of each boring during the drilling operations. At selected intervals, samples of the subsurface materials were taken by means of driving a 2.5 -inch O.D. modified California barrel sampler. Bulk samples were also obtained from selected test borings. Penetration resistance measurements were obtained by driving the California barrel into Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed FedEx Facility a Town of Mead, Weld County, Colorado July 26, 2018 ■ Terracon Project No. 22185003 lrerracon GeoReport the subsurface materials with a 140 -pound hammer falling 30 inches. The penetration resistance value, when properly interpreted, is a useful index in estimating the consistency, relative density, or hardness of the materials encountered. Groundwater levels were recorded in each boring at the time of site exploration and 8 to 12 days after completion of drilling. After the groundwater levels were checked, the borings were backfilled with on -site soils (auger cuttings). Some settlement of the backfill may occur over time and should be repaired as soon as possible. A CME automatic hammer was used to advance the California barrel sampler in the borings performed on this site. A greater efficiency is typically achieved with the automatic hammer compared to the conventional safety hammer operated with a cathead and rope. Published correlations between penetration values and soil properties are based on the lower efficiency cathead and rope method. This higher efficiency affects the penetration resistance blow count value by increasing the penetration per hammer blow over what would be obtained using the cathead and rope method. The effect of the automatic hammer's efficiency has been considered in the interpretation and analysis of the subsurface information for this report. The penetration test provides a reasonable indication of the in -place density of sandy type materials, but only provides an indication of the relative stiffness of cohesive materials since the blow count in these soils may be affected by the soils moisture content. Laboratory Testing Samples retrieved during the field exploration were returned to the laboratory for observation by the project geotechnical engineer and were visually classified in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System described in the Supporting Information section of this report. Samples of bedrock were classified in accordance with the general notes for Rock Classification. After sample review by the project engineer, an applicable laboratory testing program was formulated to determine engineering properties of the subsurface materials. Following completion of the laboratory testing, the field and visual descriptions were confirmed or modified as necessary, and Logs of Borings were prepared. These logs are presented in the Exploration Results section of this report. Se!ected samples were tested for the following physical and/or engineering properties: • Moisture Content • Dry Unit Weight • Unconfined Compressive Strength • Swell -Consolidation Potential • Percent Fines Responsive • Resourceful ■ Reliable Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed FedEx Facility • Town of Mead, Weld County, Colorado July 26, 2018 • Terracon Project No. 22185003 • Atterberg Limits R -value N Water Soluble Sulfate Content lierracon GeoRepOrt Laboratory test results are indicated on the boring logs and are presented in depth in the Exploration Results section. The test results are used for the geotechnical engineering analyses and the development of foundation, on -grade slab, pavement and earthwork recommendations. Laboratory tests are performed in general accordance with applicable local standards or other accepted standards. Procedural standards noted in this report are for reference to methodology in general. In some cases, variations to methods are applied as a result of local practice or professional judgment. Descriptive classifications of the soils indicated on the boring logs are in accordance with the enclosed General Notes and the Unified Soil Classification System. Also shown are estimated Unified Soil Classification Symbols. A brief description of this classification system as well as the General Notes can be found in the Supporting Information section. Classification was by visual - manual procedures. Selected samples were further classified using the results of Atterberg limit and percent fines testing. The Atterberg limit test results are also provided in the Exploration Results section. Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable SITE LOCATION AND EXPLORATION PLANS SITE LOCATION Proposed FedEx Facility • Mead, Colorado July 26, 2018 • Terracon Project No. 22185003 lierracon GeoReport DIAGRAM IS FOR GENERAL LOCATION ONLY, AND IS NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY PROVIDED BY MICROSOFT BING MAPS ,I j 1 I t r 'IN lea NS„ loon\ • PROJECT SITE - Lake Mane • :\ e- S a mac. WCR 34', \ � M l Lfir VICINITY MAP N.T.S. LEGEND: APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF TEST BORING DRILLED ON MARCH 21 & 22, 2018 4 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF TEST BORING DRILLED ON JUNE 28, 2018 ;r\ BORING COULD NOT BE DRILLED DUE TO IRRIGATION ACTIVITIES • TEMPORARY BENCH MARK (TBM) TOP OF SURVEY PIN AND CAP PROVIDED ELEV. = 4963.64 FEET r" • i • DIAGRAM IS FOR GENERAL LOCATION ONLY. AND IS NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES Project Manager. 1-_- SW Drawn by• GMM Checked by: Ft -13 Approved by. Er IV Project No. 2218500`4 Scale: 1" = 300' + - File Name: 22185003 EP Date: 7/17/201 b lierracon Consulting Engineers & Scientists 1242 Bramwoo,t! F-laCe Longmont, Cokn ado 80501 PH. (303) 776-3921 FAX. (303) 776-4041 EXPLORATION PLAN SCANNELL PROPERTIES MEAD FEDEX FACILITY SE OF E. 1-25 FRONTAGE ROAD AND WCR 36 TOWN OF MEAD, COLORADO EXPLORATION RESULTS 03 I- 0 0 w H Q I- Q F- Q o, 0 F- a 2 Q LL w 0 w LL 0 w co 0 0 cc N N GEO SMART I 0G -NO WELL THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT BORING LOG NO. TB -1 Page 1 1 of PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility CLIENT: Indianapolis, Scannell Properties Indiana SITE: Town SE of E. I-25 of Frontage Mead, Colorado Road and WCR 36 GRAPHIC LOG LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 40.24099' Longitude. -104.97748° Approximate Surface Elev: 4959.6 (Ft.) +/- DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) DEPTH (Ft.) WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS SAMPLE TYPE FIELD TEST RESULTS - - 1 SWELL-CONSOL / LOAD, (% / psf) UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (psf) WATER CONTENT (`)/0) DRY UNIT WEIGHT (pcf) ATT LIMITSRG PERCENT FINES LL -PL -PI 959+1.M 5 VEGETATIVE SOIL LAYER, Clayey •,� (/ //7' • soil with vegetation and root penetration LEAN CLAY with varying amounts of SAND (CL), orange brown. rust to brown. light brown, tan, medium stiff to soft 14.0 4945.54- 8/12" +0.8/500 15 112 _ 4/12" 17 103 3/12" +0.1/500 22 99 32-16-16 58 10- 15 9/12" 23 103 - SANDY LEAN CLAY to CLAYEY SAND (CL/SC). silty, olive -tan, grey, medium stiff/loose .0 4 942.5+/- Claystone/SILTSTONE, slightly sandy to sandy `� olive-kan. grey, rust. yellow 30.0 brown. hard to very hard 4929.5+/- ,.;; .� 50/5" 14 115 Icr - s• . 50/7" 13 121 _ - 31 .. ti • •=7 •a'1 roc 50/6" 15 117 Boring Terminated at 30 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In -situ, the transition may be gradual. Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method: 4 -inch diameter solid flight auger See Exploration description and additional See Supporting symbols and Elevation was engineer's level of field abbreviations. and Testing Procedures for a and laboratory procedures used data (If any). Information for explanation of measured in the field using an and rnri Notes: Abandonment Method. Boring backfilled with soil cuttings after delayed water levels were measured. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS errecon 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont, CO Boring Started: 03-21-2018 Boring Completed: 03-21-2018 V 29 feet after completion of drilling Rig: CME-55 Driller: ODELL SE 13 feet when measured on 4/2/2018 13 Project No.. 22185003 co a w H Q 2 H Q 0 z O w CD Q U- W O w U- a w cp 0 co N NJ GEO SMART LOG -NO Wt=' THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT BORING LOG NO. TB -2 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility CLIENT: Indianapolis, Scannell Properties Indiana SITE: Town SE of E. of I-25 Mead, Frontage Colorado Road and WCR 36 GRAPHIC LOG LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 40.24073° Longitude: -104.97704' Approximate Surface Elev: 4958.1 (Ft.) +/- DEPT- ELEVATION (Ft.1 DEPTH (Ft.) WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS SAMPLE TYPE FIELD TEST RESULTS SWELL-CONSOL / LOAD, (°/0 / psf) UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (psf) WATER CONTENT (%) DRY UNIT WEIGHT (pcf) PERCENT FINES ATTERB LIMITS LL -PL -PI s 5+1. — — _ \V H H . -\ VEGETATIVE SOIL LAYER, Clayey soil with7957 \vegetation and root penetration LEAN CLAY with varying amounts of SAND (CL), light brown, olive to crown, brown, tan, grey, soft to stiff 17.0 4941+/- 9/12" 12 114 _ 4/12" +0.1/500 19 106 63 M 5/12" 16 106 15-11' 12/12" 20 110 N -_ _ Claystone/SILTSTONE, slightly sandy to sandy, a. olive 22.0 -tan, grey, rust, hard, slightly cemented in places 4936+1- ;.� 50/8" 13 120 20- - - r .� . rL :s' • .a Sandstone/SILTSTONE, slightly clayey, olive -tan, rust, very hard, fine grained, poorly cemented 25.0 -1933+/- 7 0 -: :. 50/5" 19 102 : :. 25 Boring Terminated at 25 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In -situ. the transition may be gradual. Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method: 4 -inch diameter solid flight auger See Exploration description and additional See Supporting symbols and Elevation was Pnpnee?s of field abbreviations. le`Jel and and data Information measured and Testing laboratory (If any). rnd Procedures for a procedures used for explanation of in the field using an Notes: Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with soil cuttings after delayed water levels were measured. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS lerracon 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont. CO Bonng Started: 03-21-2018 Boring Completed: 03-21-2018 24 feet after completion of drilling Drill Rig: CME-55 Driller ODELL 14.5 feet when measured on 4/2/2018 Project No.: 22185003 co H w a J CL H 0' z 0 w H a J X 0 w U- 0 Q w 2 co 0 0 U) co N NJ 0 C H Q 2 U) 0 w C 0 a w J Q z_ 0 2 Q LL 0 w H Q a Q a w 0 J H 0 O O J 0 z m0 H BORING LOG NO. TB -3 Page 1 1 of PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility CLIENT: Indianapolis, Scannell Properties Indiana SITE: Town SE of E. of I-25 Mead, Frontage Colorado Road and WCR 36 GRAPHIC LOG LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 40.24113° Longitude: -104.9768' Approximate Surface Elev: 4960.1 (Ft.) +/- DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) DEPTH (Ft.) WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS SAMPLE TYPE FIELD TEST RESULTS SWELL-CONSOL LOAD, (°/0 / psf) UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (psf) 1 WATER CONTENT (%) DRY UNIT WEIGHT (pcf) ATTERBERG LIMITS PERCENT FINES LL -PL -PI Al >� 5 VEGETATIVE SOIL LAYER, Clayey 59.5+1, - - N soil with vegetation and root penetration LEAN CLAY with varying amounts of SAND (CL), brown, light brown, tan, very stiff to soft 13.5 4946.5+/- 8/12" 6850 13 106 5 - N 4/12" 14 111 4/12" +0.1/500 15 110 15- �slightly Claystone/SILTSTONE, to 34/12" 16 116 g sandy sandy. y y. . � firm hard, intermittent olive -tan. rust, to with ; grey, Sandstone/SILTSTONE interbeds �iC ,. a. ' Yi '- 50/8" 15 117 4940+!- _ 220.0 20 Boring Terminated at 20 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In -situ, the transition may be gradual. Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method: 4 -inch diameter solid flight auger See Exploration and Testing Procedures for a description of field and laboratory procedures used and additional data (If any). Notes: See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. Elevation was measured in the field using ar enoweees level ansi rind Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with soil cuttings after delayed water levels were measured. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS erracon 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont, CO Boring Started: 03-21-2018 Boring Completed: 03-21-2018 None encountered after completion of drilling Drill Rig: CME-55 Duller ODELL _W_ 16 feet when measured on 4/2/2018 Project No. 22185003 CO 0 w Q J Cal w Q O ft H GEO SMART l OG-NO WE THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT BORING LOG NO. TB -4 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility CLIENT: Indianapolis, Scannell Properties Indiana SITE: Town SE of E. of I-25 Mead, Frontage Colorado Road and WCR 36 GRAPHIC LOG LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude 40.24096° Longitude: -104.9762° Approximate Surface Elev: 4959.5 (Ft.) +/- DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) DEPTH (Ft.) WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS SAMPLE TYPE FIELD TEST RESULTS SWELL-CONSOL / LOAD, (°/0 / psf) UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (psf) WATER CONTFNT (%) DRY UNIT WEIGHT (pcf) PERCENT FINES ATTERBERG LIMITS LL -PL -PI 5 VEGETATIVE SOIL LAYER, Clayey soil with959+/ r\vegetation N7 I'p') / 1/./ //1 / /14.0 and root penetrationLEAN CLAY with varying amounts of SAND (CL), brown, light brown, tan/beige, medium stiff to very stiff 4945.5+/- N 8/12" +1.2/500 16 112 _H N N N N 7/12" 1 2730 22 97 9/12" 4400 16 113 10- /1/ • SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), silty. light brown, tan, soft 3/12" +0.0/500 23 105 to very soft 33.0 4926.5+/- 15_ -- - V 2/12" 26 20- 3/12" 28 25- _ 30-- _ 3� Claystone/SILTSTONE, slightly sandy to sandy, 35.0 olive -tan. grey, hard 4924.5+/- 50/8" 16 117 -• Boring Terminated at 35 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In -situ, the transition may be gradual. Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method: 4 -inch diameter solid flight auger See Exploration and Testing Procedures for a description ofield and laboratory procedures used and additional data (If any). Notes: See Supporting symbols and Elevation was engincers'owl Information for explanation of abbreviations. measured in the field using an and rnri Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with soil cuttings after delayed water levels were measured. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS erracon 1242 Bramwood P1 Longrnont, CO Bonng Started: 03-21-2018 Boring Completed: 03-21-2018 V 17.5 feet after completion of drilling Drill Rig: CME-55 Driller: ODELL SE 16.5 feet when measured on 4/2/2018 Project No. 22185003 co N- 0 w H Q 2 I- Q Q D I z 0 Cr w H a CD J U Q Lu W U- 0 w 2 O O cc r N N J LL Cb J H Cr Q 2 O w 0 Cr 0 a w a J Q z_ Q Q 0 cc LL w H Q a Q a w C J Q H 0 z U) O O J m cn z F - BORING LOG NO. TB -5 1 Page 1 of PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility CLIENT: Indianapolis, Scannell Properties Indiana SITE: Town SE of E. of I-25 Mead, Frontage Colorado Road and WCR 36 GRAPHIC LOG LOCATION See Exploration Plan DEPTH (Ft.) WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS SAMPLE TYPE FIELD TEST RESULTS SWELL-CONSOL / LOAD, (% / psf) UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (psf) (`I,) 1NM1NOD efl1VM DRY UNIT WEIGHT (pcf) ATTERB LIMITS PERCENT FINES LL -PL -PI Latitude: 40.24135' Longitude -104.97577° Approximate Surface Elev: 4963.2 (Ft.) +/- DEPTH ELEVATION (_Ft.) 5 VEGETATIVE SOIL LAYER, Clayey soil with 62 5+1 ._7 _ A'ri>jt • /46.0 \vegetation and root penetration LEAN CLAY with varying amounts of SAND (CL), brown, light brown, medium stiff 4957+/- 8/12" +2.1/500 _ 13 111 - _ - -- 36/12" +2.3/750 16 116 Claystone/SILTSTONE, slightly sandy to sandy, olive -tan, grey. rust, yellow hard, with intermittent Sandstone/SILTSTONE 30.0 brown, medium hard to very interbeds 4933+/- - - , 44/12" +0.3/500 17 106 ... 10 s • 50/7" 14 119 st.. ~ i 15- — s . =7 . 'mss • 50/8" 13 106 + -,,• 20-- j .rte y r • 7C 50/5" 17 110 . -.� 25 — — d S w� c ate. a.TR J� . 50/3" 15 109 • w'- 30 Boring Terminated at 30 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In -situ, the transition may be gradual. Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method: 4 -inch diameter solid flight auger See Exploration and Testing Procedures for a description of field and laboratory procedures used and additional data (If any). Notes See Supporting symbols and Elevation was abbreviations. have' Information measured and for explanation of in the field using an rod Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with soil cuttings after delayed water levels were measured. ,_enaineeis WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS erracon 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont, CO Boring Started: 03-21-2018 Boring Completed 03-21-2018 23 feet after completion of drilling Dnil Rig: CME-55 Driller ODELL 14.5 feet when measured on 4/2/2018 _SE Project No 22185003 co H 0 w Q J F- Q i- 0 cc w I - 22185003 MEAD FEDFX FACILE GEO SMART LOG -NO WE' i H cc O a- w it J Q z Cr; Er O O Q! u_ O w i- Q Er Q a. w LL O J Q I- O z U) O O J 0 Er O m F - BORING LOG NO. TB -6 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility CLIENT: Indianapolis, Scannell Properties Indiana SITE: Town SE of E. of I-25 Mead, Frontage Colorado Road and WCR 36 GRAPHIC LOG LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 40.24116° Longitude: -104.97513° Approwmate Surface Elev: 4960.6 (Ft.) +/- DPPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) DEPTH (Ft.) WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS SAMPLE TYPE FIELD TEST RESULTS SWELL-CONSOL I LOAD, (% / psf) UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (psf) WATER CONTENT (%) DRY UNIT WEIGHT (pcf) ATTERBERG LIMITS PERCENT FINES LL -PL -PI VEGETATIVE SOIL LAYER, Clayey soil with960+/vegetation - H Nr— N H_ ,:*' /, • �• . , and root penetration LEAN CLAY with varying amounts of SAND (CL), brown, light brown, tan :o orange to red brown, medium stiff to very stiff 14.5 4946+4 10/12" +0.8/500 11 110 7/12" i 4410 15 110 6/12" +0.5/500 15 113 69 10- 7/12" 21 104 Claystone/SILTSTONE, slightly sandy to sandy, olive, - — 1 5- grey, rust, weathered to firm 21.0 4939.5+,- 20-- _ = Claystone/SILTSTONE, slightly sandy to sandy, olive -tan, grey. rust, hard, slightly 25.0 cemented in places 4935.5+/ ..; 50/7" 14 118 :, ' 25 Boring Terminated at 25 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In -situ, the transition may be gradual. Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method: 4 -inch diameter solid flight auger See Exploration description and additional See Supporting symbols and Elevation was spn©neeec 1Pvel of field abbreviations. and Testing Procedures for a and laboratory procedures used data (If any). Information for explanation of measured in the field using an and r d Notes: Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with soil cuttings after delayed water levels were measured. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS erracon 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont CO Bonng Started: 03-21-2018 Boring Completed: 03-21-2018 24 feet after completion of drilling Drill Rig: CME-55 Driller: ODELL 17 feet when measured on 4/2/2018 Project No . 22185003 co F- 0 w Q J w F- Q a 0 0 cc H CD J Q LL w 0 LL a Q w cr) O O 4) 00 N N J w 0 a 0 F- Q O w C7 cc 0 a w cc J Q z 3 E2 0 0 w O w I- Q Q a. w LL O J Q F- 0 z CO C� 0 0 J z z H .. BORING LOG NO. TB -7 Page 1 of 1 • PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility CLIENT: Indianapolis, Scannell Properties Indiana SITE: SE Town of E. of I-25 Mead, Frontage Colorado Road and WCR 36 GRAPHIC LOG LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 40.24155' Longitude: -104.97466° Approximate Surface Elev- 4964.9 (Ft.) +/- DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) DEPTH (Ft.) WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS SAMPLE TYPE FIELD TEST RESULTS SWELL-CONSOL LOAD, (% / psf) UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (psf) WATER CONTENT (%) DRY UNIT WEIGHT (pcf) PERCENT FINES ATTERBERG LIMITS LL -PL -PI A'r) 5 SOIL LAYER. Clayey soil with 64-5+/ — J — • • • • , • 4/4 . ,14.0 AVEGETATIVE vegetation and root penetration LEAN CLAY with varying amounts of SAND (CL), orange brown, rust to brown, light brown. tan, medium stiff to very stiff 4951+1- 8/12" 12 112 5- _Hir 5/12" +0.3/500 15 110 35-16-19 54 N 7/12" 6690 13 117 1G- ,� _ _ . z/ SANDY LEAN CLAY to CLAYEY SAND (CL/SC), silty, H 5/12" +0.0/500 21 103 50 olive -tan, medium stiffivery loose 19.0 4946+1 - 5- , • • • • .. - 7/12" 25 SILTY, CLAYEY SAND (SC-SM), olive -tan, brown, loose, fine to medium grained 26.0 4939+/- 20- 25- Mr - _ Claystone/SILTSTONE, slightly sandy to sandy, ' olive -tan, grey, rust. very hard 30.0 4935+/- . � ^ ra 50/5" 15 118 30 Boring Terminated at 30 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In -situ, the transition may be gradual. Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method: 4 -inch diameter solid flight auger See Exploration description of field and additional See Supporting symbols and abbreviations. Elevation was Pngineer's level and Testing Procedures for a and laboratory procedures used data (If any). Information for explanation of measured in the field using an anti rnri Notes Abandonment Method: Bonng backfilled with soil cuttings after delayed water levels were measured. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS li!rracclr'lDrill 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont, CO Bonng Started: 03-21-2018 Boring Completed: 03-21-2018 18 feet after completion of drilling Rig CME-55 Driller ODELL �_ 18.5 feet when measured on 4/2/2018 Project No. 22185003 co N- H C07 H Q w Q 0 0 cc w H a 7 J Q w U- 0 w U 0 J J w 0 th F- N Q V/ 0 w O I- 0 1_L0 J Q z C_7 0 0 w r - Q Q a w 0 J Q ►- O z O O J z 0 H BORING LOG NO. TB -8 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility CLIENT: Indianapolis, Scannell Properties Indiana SITE: SE of Town E. of I-25 Mead, Frontage Colorado Road and WCR 36 GRAPHIC LOG LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 40.2414' Longitude: -104.97407' Approximate Surface Elev: 4964.2 (Ft.) +/- DEPTh ELEVATION (Ft.) DEPTH (Ft.) WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS SAMPLE TYPE FIELD TEST RESULTS SWELL-CONSOL / LOAD, (% / psf) UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (psf) WATER CONTFNT (%) DRY UNIT WEIGHT (pcf) PERCENT FINES ATTERBERG LIMITS LL -PL -PI lye>ik 5 SOIL LAYER, Clayey soil with 63 5+/r - - N H ' �/ i ,� 1VEGETATIVE \vegetation and root penetration LEAN CLAY with varying amounts of SAND (CL1, brown, rust, light brown, medium stiff 6.0 4958+/- 8/12" +0.7/500 13 114 56 — - . . •4SJ 5/12" 14 102 SILTY, CLAYEY SAND (SC-SM), silty, olive -tan, rust, loose, 8.5 fine to medium grained 4955.5+/- H HI Claystone/SILTSTONE, slightly sandy to sandy. tan, 50/10" +0.7/1000 15 111 39-23-16 84 . grey. rust.. medium hard 13.0 49514- : 1 • - . `� ::, Sands+.one/SILTSTONE. slightly clayey. olive -tan, very fine grained, poorly cemented 4947+1- 50/6" 18 104 •=: ;: •hard, 20- ... :.r W . Claystone/SIL.TSTONE, slightly sandy to sandy, �17.0 r olive -tan, grey, rust, very hard 23.0 4941+/- ;_ 50/5" - 15 113 --' -• �,- — 25- . s- Sandstone/SILTSTONE, slightly clayey. olive -tan. very - ' - hard, fine grained, cemented in places 76.0 4938+1- 50/3" 16 ..:: ri • ., r. : - $4 . .. Claystone/SILTSTONE, slightly sandy to sandy, r olive -tan, grey. rust, very 30.0 hard 4934+/- . 50/5" 14 107 �^ •_ 3o- acting Terminated at 30 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In -situ, the transition may be gradual. Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method: 4 -inch diameter solid flight auger See Explorat description and additional See Supporting symbols and Elevation was engineer's ievei on and Testing Procedures for a of field and laboratory procedures used data (If any). Information for explanation of abbreviations. measured in the field using an and rid Notes: Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with soil cuttings after delayed water levels were measured. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS Fbrracori 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont, CO Boring Started: 03-21-2018 Boring Completed: 03-21-2018 None encountered after completion of drilling Drill Rig: CME-55 Driller: ODELL 17 feet when measured on 4/2/2018 __ Project No. 22185003 CO O N- I- H Q 2 w Q zI 0 Cr .s CC H V LL w 0 O W CO O O cc N J J w O J CC Q U. 0 w 0 THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. BORING LOG NO. TB -9 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility CLIENT: Indianapolis, Scannell Properties Indiana SITE: Town SE of E. of 1-25 Mead, Frontage Colorado Road and WCR 36 GRAPHIC LOG LOCATION See Exploration PlanRB Latitude: 40.24251' Longitude: -104.97569° Approximate Surface Elev: 4969.8 (Ft.) +l- DEPT- ELEVATION (Ft.) DEPTH (Ft.) WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS SAMPLE TYPE FIELD TEST RESULTS SWELL-CONSOL / LOAD, (% / psf) UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (psf) WATER CONTENT (%) DRY UNIT WEIGHT (pcf) Al 1E=RG LIMITS PERCENT FINES LL -PL -PI - VEGETATIVE SOIL LAYER, Clayey soil with 69 5+/y - —N w p1)' �/� vegetation and root penetration� LEAN CLAY with varying amounts of SAND (CL). brown, orange brown, rust, medium stiff 6.0 4964+/- 7/12" +0.2/500 16 112 5-- - _ — N N 44/12" +0.4/750 20 109 Claystone/SILTSTONE, slightly sandy to sandy. =• � olive -tan, grey, rust. medium hard to very hard, with intermittent Sandstone/SILTSTONE interbeds 30 0 4940+1- 50/6" +0.2/1000 15 114 1 1 0~ • 50/6" 15 107 ; •ar_ _•r�e 50/6" 13 106 20- 2 ~ cV •sue IN frin50/5" 50/6" 14 112 - 5- ~ - ws 18 106 S • 30 Boring Terminated at 30 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In -situ, the transition may be gradual. Hammer Type Automatic Advancement Method: 4 -inch diameter solid flight auger See Exploration and Testing Procedures for a description of field and laboratory procedures used and additional data (If any). Notes: See Supporting symbols and abbreviations. Elevation was engineer's level Information for explanation of measured in the field using an and End Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with soil cuttings after delayed water levels were measured. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS erracon 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont, CO Bonng Started: 03-21-2018 Bonng Completed: 03-21-2018 = 28 feet after completion of drilling Drill Rig: CME-55 Driller ODELL SIE 10 feet when measured on 4/2/2018 Project No. 22185003 co H C CD H Q 2 w F- Q 0 0 cr I- a C7 J U Q u_ 0 Q w r C C U7 co N N J El! 5 0 th 0 I- Q a 0 w C^. THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT BORING LOG NO. TB -10 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility CLIENT: Indianapolis, Scannell Properties Indiana SITE: SE of Town E. of I-25 Mead, Frontage Colorado Road and WCR 36 GRAPHIC LOG LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 40.24208' Longitude: -104.97586° Approximate Surface Elev: 4967.5 (Ft.) +/- DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.l DEPTH (Ft.) WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS SAMPLE TYPE FIELD TEST RESULTS SWELL-CONSOL / LOAD. (% / psf) UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (psf) WATER CONTENT (%) DRY UNIT WEIGHT (pcf) PERCENT FINES ATTERBERG LIMITS LL -PL -PI - - SOIL LAYER, Clayey soil withvegetation rVEGETATrVE and root penetration LEAN CLAY with varying amounts of SAND (CLI. ,op brown, orange brown. rust, very stiff to medium stiff 4961+/- 7/12" 6620 15 111 5 —9/12" - - — 23 103 V.5 Claystone/SILTSTONE, slightly sandy to sandy, 8.0 4959.5+/- -tan, weathered \olive . Claystone/SILTSTONE, slightly sandy to sandy, 50/10" +0.1/1000 16 115 91 ;.'. olive -tan, grey, medium hard 1 — _ — o►.c z 13.0 4954.5+/- ::: Sandstone/SILTSTONE. slightly clayey. olive -tan, very hard, fine in 50/5" 16 :_ grained, cemented places ::: 15- 20 _ • 17.0 4950.5+/- : Claystone/SILTSTONE, slight'y sandy to sandy. olive -tan, grey, rust, hard 50/7" +1.3/2250 23 103 4947.5+/- ,20.0 3oring Terminated at 20 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In -situ, the transition may be gradual. Hammer Type Automatic Advancement Method: 4 -inch diameter solid flight auger See Exploration and Testing Procedures for a description of field and laboratory procedures used and additional data (If any). Notes: See Supporting symbols and Elevation was nnQpneers abbreviations. levn1 Information measured and for explanation of in the field using an rod Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with soil cuttings after delayed water levels were measured. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS terra c o n 1242 Bramwood Pt Longmont, CO Boring Started: 03-21-2018 Boring Completed: 03-21-2018 None encountered after completion of drilling Drill Rig: CME-55 Driller ODELL _EFL 14 feet when measured on 4/2/2018 Project No.. 22185003 CO RZ a w H Q 2 w H Q I- Q O 0 Cf w 0 J Q U- w O LL 0 w 2 M O G LU no N N J J w Cb 0 i- 'CC 2 0 w CD THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT BORING LOG NO. TB -11 Page 1 1 of PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility CLIENT: Indianapolis, Scannell Properties Indiana SITE: Town SE of E. of I-25 Mead, Frontage Colorado Road and WCR 36 GRAPHIC LOG See Exploration Plan Latitude• 40.24174' Longitude: -104.97542 Approximate Surface Elev 4966.1 (Ft.) +/- DEPTH ELEVATION Wt.) DEPTH (Ft.) WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS SAMPLE TYPE FIELD TEST RESULTS SWELL-CONSOL / LOAD, (°/0 / psf) UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (psf) WATER CONTENT (%) DRY UNIT WEIGHT (pcf) ATTERBERG LIMITS PERCENT FINES LL -PL -PI VEGETATIVE SOIL LAYER. Clayey soil with 65 5+/, c_r_7 N ,1 0, vegetation and root penetration LEAN CLAY with varying amounts of SAND (CL1, light brown, rust, beige, medium stiff 7.5 4958.5+/- 7/12" 11 103 ,� 5 -N -• -- 5/12" +0.4/500 18 110 K .:. ;; Sandstone/SILTSTONE, slightly clayey. olive -tan, hard, fine grainer, 12.0 slightly cemented 4954+/- 9 .... 50/8" 19 110 NP 72 ; . .: • ; :: 15- 0- - — V. ' - y . . Claystone/SILTSTONE, slightly sandy to sandy, `� olive -tan, grey, rust. yellow brown. hard to very with intermittent Sandstone/SILTSTONE interbeds. slightly cemented in places hard, 4936+/_ ,,.. 50/8" +0.7/1750 16 113 r`a . �s I -s �i 50/4" 13 103 20-- — ..�, . . - asa sa ; 13 113 • 25-50/5" sie. :a .SIG Q 9_ 50/7 " 13 115 .30.0 30 Boring Terminated at 30 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In -situ. the transition may be gradual. Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method: 4 -inch diameter solid flight auger See Exploration and Testing Procedures for a description of field and laboratory procedures used and additional data (If any). Notes: See Supporting symbols and Elevation was engineer's Information abbreviations. measured level and for explanation of in the field using an rnd Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with soil cuttings after delayed water levels were measured. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont, CO Bonngerracon Started: 03-21-2018 Boring Completed: 03-21-2018 V 29 feet after completion of drilling Drill Rig: CME-55 Duller. ODELL SIL 16 feet when measured on 4/2/2018 Project No.. 22185003 co a I w a J 2 H Q of C W 2 U 0-2 w LL a 2 0 0 co N J GEO SMART LOG -NO Wi THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. BORING LOG NO. TB -12 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility CLIENT: Indianapolis, Scannell Properties Indiana SITE: Town SE of E. of I-25 Mead, Frontage Colorado Road and WCR 36 GRAPHIC LOG LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude 40.24028' Longitude: -104.97733° Approximate Surface Elev: 4954.2 (Ft.) +/- DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) DEPTH (Ft.) WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS SAMPLE TYPE FIELD TEST RESULTS SWELL-CONSOL / LOAD, (% / psf) UNCONFINED) COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (psf) WATER CONTENT (",,) DRY UNIT WEIGHT (pcf) PERCENT FINES ATTERBERG LIMITS LL -PL -PI SOIL LAYER, Clayey soil with5+/,, — — pVEGETATWE 7) �• , . vegetation and root penetration LEAN CLAY with varying amounts of SAND (CL), light brown, tan to brown, orange brown, olive, very stiff to medium stiff 13.0 4941+/- 11/12" +1.1/500 14 117 70 8/12" 4390 17 110 5/12" +0.0/500 18 106/../ 10-- 15- — Claystone/SILTSTONE, slightly sandy to sandy, . rust.yellow brown. firm to very hard 31/12" 18 113 olive -tan, grey, 25.0 4929+/- „;.. - J �' 1 . a _ TAi . ..:a 50/8" - 14 - 121 - .�-_ s.: 2� 25- . 50/6" 15 118 � - • • Boring Terminated at 25 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In -situ, the transition may be gradual. Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method: 4 -inch diameter solid flight auger See Exploration and Testing Procedures for a description of field and laboratory procedures used and additional data (If any). Notes: See Supporting symbols and Elevation was engineer's abbreviations. level Information for explanation of measured in the field using an and rod_ Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with soil cuttings after delayed water levels were measured. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS 1erraccpri 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont, CO Bonng Started: 03-22-2018 Boring Completed: 03-22-2018 18 feet after completion of drilling Dill Rig: CME-45 Diller ODELL 14 5 feet when measured on 4/2/2018 Project No.. 22185003 CO F- w F- Q 2 w I- H C 0I z O it I- CD LL w C LL C w 2 O 0 Ln op N N� GEO SMART LOG -NO WELL THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT BORING LOG NO. TB -13 Page 1 1 of PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility CLIENT: Indianapolis, Scannell Properties Indiana SITE: Town SE of E. of I-25 Mead, Frontage Colorado Road and WCR 36 GRAPHIC LOG See Exploration Plan Latitude: 40.24017' Longitude: -104.97685' Approximate Surface Elev: 4954.2 (Ft.) +/- DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) DEPTH (Ft.) WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS SAMPLE TYPE FIELD TEST RESULTS SWELL-CONSOL / LOAD, (% / psf) UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (psf) WATER CONTENT (%) DRY UNIT WEIGHT (pcf) ATTERBERG LIMITS PERCENT FINES LL -PL -PI ir � VEGETATIVE SOIL LAYER, Clayey soil with + — — 5 \V �• /13.o vegetation and root penetration LEAN CLAY with varying amounts of SAND (CLI, light brown, tan to brown, orange brown/rust, tan, very stiff to medium stiff 4941+1- 11/12" 12 109 4/12" +0.1/500 16 106 31-16-15 56 5/12" 4070 17 106 1 15-- - Claystone/SILTSTONE, slightly sandy to sandy, - olive -tan. grey, rust, yellow 30.0 brown, hard to very hard 4924+/- N 50/9" 18 113 - - • _ z• 50/6" 14 120 20 ~ . CT • 50/6" 14 116 • 25- — — a49 . a s S� I �•7R •ate H 50/7" 14 120 ' ; 30 Boring Terminated at 30 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In -situ, the transition may be gradual. Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method: 4 -inch diameter solid flight auger See Exploration description and additional See Supporting symbols and Elevation was PrguPizsr's IPVPI of field abbreviations. and Testing Procedures for a and laboratory procedures used data (If any). Information for explanation of measured in the field using an and rnri Notes: Abandonment Method: Bonng backfilled with soil cuttings after delayed water levels were measured. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS erracon 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont. CO Bonng Started: 03-21-2018 Boring Completed: 03-21-2018 None encountered after completion of drilling Drill Rig: CME-55 Duller ODELL _� 15 feet when measured on 4/2/2018 Project No. 22185003 CO I CD w F- Q w F Q Q 0 0 -, cc w H 0 U LL w 0 w LL 0 w Cr) 0 O LID CD J J w C O F--- 0 w O I O a. w cc J Q z_ DT 0 0 LL 0 w F- Q Q a w LL 0 Q I- O z U) 0 0 J z O cc F - BORING LOG NO. TB -14 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility CLIENT: Indianapolis, Scannell Properties Indiana SITE: Town SE of E. of I-25 Mead, Frontage Colorado Road and WCR 36 GRAPHIC LOG LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 40.2405° Longitude: -104.97652° Approximate Surface Elev- 4956.3 (Ft.) +/- DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) DEPTH (Ft.) WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS SAMPLE TYPE FIELD TEST RESULTS SWELL-CONSOL LOAD. (% / psf) UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (psf) WATER CONTENT (%) DRY UNIT WEIGHT (pcf) PERCENT FINES ATTERBERG LIMITS LL -PL -PI A 1 • >� 5 956+/,, —penetration _ /' /%/,' 7e • - SOIL LAYER, Clayey soil with AVEGETATIVE \vegetation and root netration LEAN CLAY with varying amounts of SAND (CL), brown, medium 8.5 light brown, to orange brown/rust, light stiff brown, 4948+4 8/12" 11 102 N " _ - — 5/12" +0.1/500 14 113 Claystone/SILTSTONE, slightly sandy to sandy,HI 25/12 20 108 olive -tan, rust, weathered to firm 12.0 4944.5+/- _ 1 15- � _ — Claystone/SILTSTONE, slightly sandy to sandy, s's olive Sandstone/SILTSTONE -tan, grey, rust, hard to very hard, with intermittent interbeds 4926.54- 50/6" +0.6/1500 14 117 s \V -. - . 50/7" +0.6/2000 15 118 -`� 20- — 25- s,s 50/6" 14 117 6+� - sS 50/6" 15 118 -"x'''30.0 Boring Terminated at 30 Feet 30 Stratification lines are approximate. In -situ, the transition may be gradual. Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method: 4 -inch diameter solid flight auger See Explorat on and Testing Procedures for a description of field and laboratory procedures used and additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. Elevation was measured in the field using an nnQ!neer's Intel and rnri Notes: Abandonment Method: Bonng backfilled with soil cuttings after delayed water levels were measured. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS li!rracclrl 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont, CO Bonng Started: 03-21-2018 Boring Completed: 03-21-2018 U 28 feet after completion of drilling Dnll Rig: CME-55 Driller: ODELL 15.5 feet when measured on 4/2/2018 Project No.. 22185003 co r ti H CD w Q J 2 w Q F- Q O� z 0 ci w I- O J Q LL w 0 w 0 5 M 0 0 up co N N GEO SMART LOG -NO WE THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT BORING LOG NO. TB -15 Page 1 1 of PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility CLIENT: Indianapolis, Scannell Properties Indiana SITE: Town SE of E. of 1-25 Mead, Frontage Colorado Road and WCR 36 GRAPHIC LOG See Exploration Plan Latitude: 40.24032° Longitude: -104.97611' Approwmate Surface Elev: 4954.0 (Ft.) +/- DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft. ) DEPTH (Ft.) WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS SAMPLE TYPE FIELD TEST RESULTS SWELL-CONSOL LOAD, C/0 / psf) UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (psf) WATER CONTENT (%) DRY UNIT WEIGHT (pcf) ATTERBERG LIMITS PERCENT FINES LL -PL -PI • SOIL LAYER, Clayey 5:1 5+/, �j' 't / �/ / / /8.0 VEGETATIVE soil with vegetation and root penetration LEAN CLAY with varying amounts of SAND (CU. brown, orange brown. tan, medium stiff 4946+/- 7/17 +0.7/500 12 102 N _ — 5/12" 18 103 Claystone/SILTSTONE, slightly sandy to sandy, -tan, rust, medium hard to very hard, with HL 50/11" +0.1/1000 17 111 34-20-14 64 olive grey. intermittent Sandstone/SI LTSTONE interbeds 18.0 4936+/- _z� 10-- - - - .s. -�_r `-- s ra s .Sj 50/9" 16 115 - - ,� .• 1 - as! ~`'•• V. Sandstone/SILTSTONE, olive -tan, rust, slightly clayey, very hard. fine grained, poorly 21.0 cemented 4933+/- 50/6" 21 108 .::... 20- _ .� e :.rj . Claystone/SILTSTONE, slightly sandy to sandy,• C' -tan, rust, very hard a olive grey. .0 4924+/- a 14 117 r- s •a ^ 245o/6" 50/5" 14 120 .30 30 Boring Terminated at 30 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In -situ, the transition may be gradual. Hammer Type Automatic Advancement Method: 4 -inch diameter solid flight auger See Exploration description and additional See Supporting symbols and Elevation was engineer's of field abbreviations. level and Testing Procedures for a and laboratory procedures used data (If any). Information for explanation of measured In the field using an and rnd Notes: Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with soil cuttings after delayed water levels were measured. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS erracon 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont. CO Boring Started: 03-22-2018 Boring Completed: 03-22-2018 .= 14.5 feet after completion of drilling Drill Rig. CME-45 Driller ODELL 14 feet when measured on 4/2/2018 Project No. 22185003 CO n a w I- Q J 2 H Q Dl z ELI F- C" U Q LL X w r_ U- C Q w 2 0 Lt, G r N J J W Ci O H Q 0 w C9 THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT BORING LOG NO. TB -16 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility CLIENT: Indianapolis, Scannell Properties Indiana SITE: Town SE of E. of I-25 Mead, Frontage Colorado Road and WCR 36 GRAPHIC LOG LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 40.24211' Longitude. -104.97902 DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) DEPTH (Ft.) WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS SAMPLE TYPE FIELD TEST RESULTS SWELL-CONSOL / LOAD, (°/0 / psf) 11NCONFINFI) COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (psf) WATER CONTENT (%) DRY UNIT WEIGHT (pcf) PERCENT FINES A I I ERBERG LIMITS LL -PL -PI i / >>5 _ m SOIL LAYER, Clayey soil with 1VEGETATIVE \vegetation and root enetrationP LEAN CLAY with varying amounts of SAND (CL), f A • �" ,/ brown, grey -brown, soft to medium stiffN 12.0 8/12" 15 109 5 _ H 6/12" 950 27 93 HI 7/12" 22 105 10 15- Claystone/SILTSTONE, to . slightly sandy sandy, olive -tan. rust. hard grey. 50/9" 15 115 - 15.0 Boring Terminated at 15 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In -situ, the transition may be gradual. Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method: 4 -inch diameter solid flight auger See Exploration and Testing Procedures for a description of field and laboratory procedures used and additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. Notes: Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with soil cuttings after delayed water levels were measured. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS erracori 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont, CO v I Boring Started: 03-22-2018 Boriig Completed: 03-22-2018 = 11 feet after completion of drilling Drill Ri : CME-45 g Driller ODELL V__ 7 feet when measured on 4/2/2018 Project No.. 22185003 �� CO r I CD u; C 2 w H C H C 0 I 0 U Q cr w H 22185003 MEAD FEDEX FACILI.GP.; CEO SMART LOG -NO WELL H 0 a_ w a J C z C D 0 2 0 0 w H C C a w 0 J C 0 C O J 0 EY- (I) H BORING LOG NO. -17 Page 1 of 1 TB PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility CLIENT: Indianapolis, Scannell Properties Indiana SITE: SE Town of E. I-25 of Mead, Frontage Colorado Road and WCR 36 GRAPHIC LOG LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 40.24244' Longitude: -104.97816' DEPTH ELEVATION (Ftj DEPTH (Ft.) WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS SAMPLE TYPE FIELD TEST RESULTS SWELL-CONSOL LOAD, (°/0 / psf) UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (psf) WATER CONTENT (%) DRY UNIT WEIGHT (pcf) ATTERBERG LIMITS PERCENT FINES LL -PL -PI A' VEGETATIVE SOIL LAYER, Clayey soil with i->` / , 4 10.0 vegetation and root penetration LEAN CLAY with varying amounts of SAND (CL1. 18/12" 13 115 42-20-22 81 brown, grey -brown to light stiff brown tan, stiff to medium H 8/12" 20 101 5 6/12" 26 Boring at 10 Feet 1 a Terminated Stratification lines are approximate. In -situ, the transition may be gradual. Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method: 4 -inch diameter solid flight auger See Exploration and Testing Procedures for a description of field and laboratory procedures used and additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. Notes: Abandonment Method. Boring backfilled with soil cuttings after delayed water levels were measured. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS erracon 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont. CO Boring Started: 03-22-2018 Boring Completed: 03-22-2018 _\Z 8 feet after completion of drilling Drill Rig CME 45 Duller ODELL Wet cave-in at 8 feet when measured on 4/2/2018 Project No 22185003 co N- CD w I- cc 2 F - Q I Q o' U Q Cr CC W H 22185003 MEAD FEDEX FACILI.GP J GEO SMART LOG -NO WEI I CC O CL w Q z O O a O w I- Q a w w 12 J Q O z U) a O J z 0 00 U) F -- BORING LOG NO. TB -18 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility CLIENT: Indianapolis, Scannell Properties Indiana SITE: Town SE of E. of I-25 Mead, Frontage Colorado Road and WCR 36 o O v T CI g C� LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 40.24281' Longitude: -104.97639' DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) -_- LL = I- a J z uw O_ W~ < a:> LULL m 0 w Q ~ w CL Q (/) H w H F- OO _ww wa J - O a 0 o O, O_" �b wa0 J v ''� " C> n. u - ? al= `lw~ za0 gaz zOcC ' Ci i a z Luz Qw �z O U z a jI- = a9 Ow ATTERBERG LIMITS w LL -PL -PI '1 F- z w X w a -- SOIL LAYER, Clayey soil with V5_1\VEGETATWE vegetation and root penetration / LEAN CLAY with varying amounts of SAND (CL), 12/12" +0.8/200 24 99 j brown, light brown, stiff 4.5 8/6"-21/6" 18 109 Claystone/SILTSTONE, to 10 5 slightly sandy sandy, 04 • olive -tan, hard grey, medium 7.0 • • ::: Sandstone/SILTSTONE, slightly clayey. olive -tan, rust, brown, hard, fine •. : yellow medium grained. poorly y .10.E cemented 50/11" 18 108 Boring Terminated at 10 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In -situ, the transition may be gradual. Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method: 4 -inch diameter solid flight auger See Exploration and Testing Procedures for a description of field and laboratory procedures used and additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. Notes: Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with soil cuttings after delayed water levels were measured. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS l�rraccri 1242 Bramwood Pi Longmont, CO Boring Started: 03-22-2018 Boring Completed: 03-22-2018 None encountered after completion of drilling Drill Rig: CME-45 Driller. ODELL ._SE 8 feet when measured on 4/2/2018 Project No. 22185003 co I U w H 2 w H Q F- 0 w F- a CD J_ O Q LL x w J w 11 0 Q w 2 Nl C co ^r' NJ J w O th J H 1 2 0 w 0 THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT BORING LOG NO. TB -19 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility CLIENT: Indianapolis, Scannell Properties Indiana SITE: SE of Town E. of I-25 Mead, Frontage Colorado Road and WCR 36 GRAPHIC LOG LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 40.24315' Longitude: -104.97429 DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) DEPTH (Ft.) WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS SAMPLE TYPE FIELD TEST RESULTS SWELL-CONSOL LOAD, (% / psf) UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (psf) WATER CONTENT (%) DRY UNIT WEIGHT (pcf) ATTERBERG LIMITS PERCENT FINES LL -PL -PI i • 5 — 15.0 VEGETATIVE SOIL LAYER, Clayey soil with A \vegetation and root penetration LEAN CLAY with varying amounts of SAND (CL1 olive -tan, beige, cream, soft to medium stiff 4/12" 1210 26 95 33-17-16 62 Sandstone/SILTSTONE, slightly clayey. olive -tan, very _ •• hard, fine grained, poorly to moderately cemented 50/5" 18 ::::: Claystone/SILTSTONE, slightly sandy to sandy. of 12.0 ve-tan, rust, grey, hard 50/7" 13 1 5 � - � w 10— • •:' Sandstone/SILTSTONE, slightly clayey. olive, dive -tan, very hard, fine grained, poorly to moderately cemented 15.015 : "H.? 50/5" 18 Boring Terminated at 15 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In -situ, the transition may be gradual. Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method: 4 -inch diameter solid flight auger See Exploration and Testing Procedures for a description of field and laboratory procedures used and additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. Notes: Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with soil cuttings after delayed water levels were measured. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS erracon 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont. CO Boring Started: 03-22-2018 Boring Completed: 03-22-2018 None encountered after completion of drilling Drill Rig: CME-45 Driller ODELL 8 feet when measured on 4/2/2018 Project No. 22185003 a CO N- H 0 w Q 2 I- Q C C 0 Q cf cc w I- Cal J U Q LL O w w C Q w M co N N J J w L th Q c L O w C� THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. BORING LOG NO. -20 Page 1 of 1 TB PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility CLIENT: Indianapolis, Scannell Properties Indiana SITE: SE Town of E. of I-25 Mead, Frontage Colorado Road and WCR 36 GRAPHIC LOG LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 40.24182' Longitude: -104.97703° DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) DEPTH (Ft.) WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS SAMPLE TYPE FIELD TEST RESULTS SWELL-CONSOL / LOAD, (% / psf) UNCONFINFD COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (psf) WATER CONTENT ((YU) DRY UNIT WEIGHT (pcf) ATTERBERG LIMITS w LL -PL -PI z is: z v rx w 5 VEGETATIVE SOIL LAYER, Clayey soil with 5 Pt . / /21 A 10.0 1 / 10 \egetation and root penetration LEAN CLAY with varying amounts of SAND (CL), — N H 9/12" +2.2/200 10 ` 100 35-18-17 70 orange brown/rust to brown, tan, medium stiff to very 9 stiff 11/12" 11 108 . 6/12" 4600 16 111 Boring Terminated at 10 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In -situ, the transition may be gradual. Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method: 4 -inch diameter solid flight auger See description and See Exploration and Testing Procedures for a of field and laboratory procedures used additional data (If any). Supporting Information for explanation of and abbreviations. Notes: Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with soil cuttings after delayed water levels were measured. symbols WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS li!rrEcI:3rl 1242 Bramwood P1 Longmont, CO Boring Started: 03-22-2018 Boring Completed: 03-22-2018 None encountered after completion of drilling Drill Rig: CME-45 Driller: ODELL Dry cave-in at 6 feet when measured on 4/2/2018 Project No.. 22185003 co N- 0 CD w H- Q 2 w H Q 0 z 0 0 Q tY CC w H J_ 0 Q LL X w 0 w w O Q w 2 or) 0 0 Ln co N N GEO SMART LOG -NO WELL H C a_ w It J Q z_ O It 0 0 (Y LL 0 w H Q Cr Q a w LL 0 J Q F-- 0 CD O J C7 0 cc z BORING LOG NO. TB -21 Page 1 1 of PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility CLIENT: Indianapolis, Scannell Properties Indiana SITE: Town SE of E. of I-25 Mead, Frontage Colorado Road and WCR 36 GRAPHIC LOG LOCATION See Exploration Ran Latitude: 40.24211' Longitude: -104.97481' DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) DEPTH (Ft.) WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS SAMPLE TYPE FIELD TEST RESULTS SWELL-CONSOL / LOAD, (% / psf) UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (psf) WATER CONTENT (%) DRY UNIT WEIGHT (pcf) At ►ERBERG LIMITS PERCENT FINES LL -PL -PI SOIL LAYER, Clayey soil with nVEGETATIVE vegetation and root penetration /LEAN pI CLAY with varying amounts of SAND (CL. 5/12" 10 105 37-17-20 70 • fA.V. brown, light brown, tan, rust, medium stiff to stiff 8.0 5/12" 3480 18 107 N 5 _ to Claystone/SILTSTONE, slightly sandy sandy. -` 50/12" 17 113 intermittent olive -tan, rust, medium hard. with grey. 10.0 . ' \Sandstone/SILTSTONE interbeds C Boring Terminated at 10 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In -situ, the transition may be gradual. Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method: 4 -inch diameter solid flight auger - -- See Exploration and Testing Procedures for a description of field and laboratory procedures used and additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. Notes: Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with soil cuttings after delayed water levels were measured. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS 1�rraccri 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont, CO Boring Started: 03-22-2018 Boring Completed: 03-22-2018 None encountered after completion of drilling Drill Rig: CME-45 Duller. ODELL Dry cave-in at 8 feet when measured on 4/2/2018 Project No. 22185003 CO H a w H Q H Q H Q O z O U cc Cr w H 2 J 0 1 LL X w 0 w LL 0 LLU M O O oo c -- N CN J J w 0 0 I- Cr Q 2 v % 0 w C7 Cr O a w J Q z_ a Cr 0 2 0 Cr LL 0 w H Cr Q a w L 0 J Q H 0 z U) C� O J CD 0 co r H BORING LOG NO. TB -22 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility CLIENT: Indianapolis, Scannell Properties Indiana SITE: Town SE of E. of I-25 Mead, Frontage Colorado Road and WCR 36 GRAPHIC LOG LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 40.24133' Longitude: -104.97833° DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) DEPTH (Ft.) WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS SAMPLE TYPE FIELD TEST RESULTS SWELL-CONSOL / LOAD, (°/0 / psf) UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (psf) WATER CONTENT (%) DRY UNIT WEIGHT (pcf) PERCENT FINES ATTERBERG LIMITS LL -PL -PI A A4 a 5 5 VEGETATIVE SOIL LAYER, Clayey soil with A A vegetation and root penetration HI N LEAN CLAY with varying amounts of SAND (CL), 8/12" +1.5/200 14 115 brown, orange brown/rust, tan, medium stiff to stiff 9/12" 3780 19 105 10 _ � � . Claystone/SILTSTONE, slightly sandy to sandy. 31/12" 1 5 117 olive -tan, rust, firm .= 10.0 grey. olive, Boring Terminated at 10 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In -situ, the transition may be gradual. Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method: 4 -inch diameter solid flight auger See Exploration and Testing Procedures for a description of field and laboratory procedures used and additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. Notes: Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with soil cuttings after delayed water levels were measured. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS erracon 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont. CO Bonng Started: 03-22-2018 Boring Completed: 03-22-2018 None encountered after completion of drilling Drill Rig: CME-45 Driller ODELL SIL 8 feet when measured on 4/2/2018 Project No. 22185003 CO H CD w a. cr cr Q w H Q H Q c z O U Q w F- a J U Q U- X w W U - a w 0 0 LU oo r J J w O U O J Cr Q 2 (I) O w O Cr O a_ w J Q z C) O O LL a w I- Q Q a- w u_ a J Q H O CD O J CD z O H BORING LOG NO. -23 Page 1 of 1 TB PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility CLIENT: Indianapolis, Scannell Properties Indiana SITE: SE Town of E. of I-25 Mead, Frontage Colorado Road and WCR 36 GRAPHIC LOG LOCATION See Latitude: 40.2409° Longitude- -104.97913° DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) DEPTH (Ft.) WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS SAMPLE TYPE FIELD TEST RESULTS SWELL-CONSOL LOAD, ((Yip / psf) UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (psf) WATER CONTENT (%) DRY UNIT WEIGHT (pcf) D r r�r _ =op G7 PERCENT FINES > VEGETATIVE SOIL LAYER, Clayey soil with I 10 5 f; 7f • • / J'f io.o vegetation and root penetration LEAN CLAY with varying amounts of SAND (CL1, 6/12" +1.0/200 17 106 38-17-21 73 brown, light brown, olive -tan. beige. medium stiff to stiff — H H 7/12" 2180 20 103 —1W 7/12" 23 103 Boring Terminated at 10 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In -situ. the transition may be gradual. Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method: 4 -inch diameter solid flight auger See Exploration and description of field and additional data See Supporting Information symbols and abbreviations. Testing and laboratory (If any). Procedures for a procedures used for explanation of Notes: Abandonment Method: Bonng backfilled with soil cuttings after delayed water levels were measured. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS erracon 1242 Bramwood P1 Longmont. CO Bonng Started: 03-22-2018 Boring Completed: 03-22-2018 None encountered after completion of drilling Drill Rig CME-45 Duller ODELL 8.5 feet when measured on 4/2/2018 Project No. 22185003 co r 0 a J 2 w Q Q O O U Q cc w H THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT BORING LOG NO. -24 Page 1 of 1 TB PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility CLIENT: Indianapolis, Scannell Properties Indiana SITE: SE Town of E. of I-25 Mead, Frontage Colorado Road and WCR 36 GRAPHIC LOG o v O II a > cD -H o N z A O 0) (/) C9) (D o CD r m o I cn o c a— cD O v c9) � v v A r m D O z m DEPTH (Ft.) WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS SAMPLE TYPE FIELD TEST RESULTS SWELL-CONSOL LOAD, (`)/0 / psf) UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (psf) WATER CONTENT (%) DRY UNIT WEIGHT (pcf) PERCENT FINES ATTERBERG LIMITS LL -PL -PI >> 5 SOIL LAYER, Clayey soil with 1 — ,1 0 A10.0 AVEGETATIVE \vegetation and root penetration LEAN CLAY with varying amounts of SAND [CL), 11/12" 12 111 brown, light brown, tan/beige, very stiff to medium stiff 10/12" 7 590 14 114 8/12" 17 109 Boring Terminated at 10 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In -situ, the transition may be gradual. Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method: 4 -inch diameter solid flight auger See Exploration and Testing Procedures for a description of field and laboratory procedures used and additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. Notes: Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with soil cuttings after delayed water levels were measured. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS c3 erracon 1242 Bramwood P1 Longmont, CO Bonng Started: 03-22-2018 Boring Completed: 03-22-2018 None encountered after completion of drilling Drill Rig. CME-45 Driller: ODELL Dry cave-in at 8.5 feet when measured on 4/2/201 Project No.. 22185003 cc F - C CD w F - C 2 F- C F - C 0 z O U C cc W F- a O J U C U- W C w U- 0 C w en 0 0 tn w N N 0 O F - C C 2 0 w C� H a 0 a w Cr J C z_ Q' 0 2 O Cr lL 0 W F - C a C cn w 0 J F- O U) O O J 0 C °m U) z F - BORING LOG NO. -25 Page 1 of 1 TB PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility CLIENT: Indianapolis, Scannell Properties Indiana SITE: SE Town of E. I-25 of Mead, Frontage Colorado Road and WCR 36 GRAPHIC LOG LOCATION See Exploration Ran Latitude: 40.23956 Longitude -104.97831' DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) DEPTH (Ft.) WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS SAMPLE TYPE FIELD TEST RESULTS SWELL-CONSOL LOAD, (% / psf) UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (psf) WATER CONTENT (°/0) DRY UNIT WEIGHT (pcf) r r� r m -b r .I co m C PERCENT FINES VEGETATIVE SOIL LAYER, Clayey soil with 10 ,�'r r/ IL. 0 vegetation and root penetration LEAN CLAY with varying amounts of SAND (CL). _. N 8/12" +0.5/200 15 113 35-17-18 53 brown, orange brown/rust to light brown, tan/beige, very stiff to very soft 7/12" 4180 17 110 5N_ __SE Q 2/12 . 29 a Boring Terminated at 10 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In -situ, the transition may be gradual. Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method: 4 -inch diameter solid flight auger See Exploration and Testing Procedures for a description of field and laboratory procedures used and additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. Notes: Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with soil cuttings after delayed water levels were measured. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS erracon 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont, CO Boring Started: 03-22-2018 Boring Completed: 03-22-2018 9 feet after completion of drilling Drill Rig: CME-45 Duller ODELL 8 feet when measured on 4/2/2018 Project No. 22185003 co 0 I- Q 2 w Q I- Q 0 0 Q w 2 0 tL x w 0 w w 0 Q w 2 co O O LU co N N J J 'J 0 J H- Q 5 v O w C� THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. BORING LOG NO. __ __ -26 Page 1 of 1 TB PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility CLIENT: Indianapolis, Scannell Properties Indiana SITE: SE Town of E. of I-25 Mead, Frontage Colorado Road and WCR 36 GRAPHIC LOG o v r- rn v O E C� a D o ry Z A O v c0 2 ° CD r m o (n C N CD 5 pp � v v in r m D 0 Z m DEPTH (Ft.) WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS SAMPLE TYPE FIELD TEST RESULTS SWELL-CONSOL LOAD, (`)/0 / psf) UNCONFINED I COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (psf) WATER CONTENT (%) DRY UNIT WEIGHT (pcf) PERCENT FINES ATTERBERG LIMITS LL -PL -PI > ) VEGETATIVE SOIL LAYER, Clayey soil with 5 —Pe ' ,/ i0.0 \vegetation and root netration - LEAN CLAY with varying amounts of SAND (CL), — 14/12" +3.1/200 11 105 42-20-22 72 brown, red brown, tan/beige, very stiff to medium stiff H 9/12" 13 114 6/12" 4850 17 111 Boring Terminated at 10 Feet 10 Stratification lines are approximate. In -situ, the transition may be gradual. Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method: 4 -inch diameter solid flight auger See Exploration and Testing Procedures for a description of field and laboratory procedures used and additional data (If any). See Suoporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. N , n- Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with soil cuttings after delayed water levels were measured. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS erracon 1242 Bramwood P1 Longmont, CO Bonng Started: 03-22-2018 Boring Completed: 03-22-2018 None encountered after completion of drilling Drill Rig: CME-45 Driller ODELL Dry cave-in at 4 feet when measured on 4/2/2018 Project No. 22185003 co ist r H O 0 w H Q a w H Q I- z 0 U Q CC w a C7 C> Q LL X w O w w 0 Q w cv, 0 0 co N N J J U> 0 I- Q 2 cn w CD THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT BORING LOG NO. TB -27 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility CLIENT: Indianapolis, Scannell Properties Indiana SITE: Town SE of E. of I-25 Mead, Frontage Colorado Road and WCR 36 GRAPHIC LOG LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 40.24026' Longitude: -104.97458' DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) DEPTH (Ft.) WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS I SAMPLE TYPE FIELD TEST RESULTS SWELL-CONSOL LOAD, (% / psf) UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (psf) WATER CONTENT (%) DRY UNIT WEIGHT (pcf) ATTERBERG LIMITS PERCENT FINES LL -PL -PI A' • _ VEGETATIVE SOIL LAYER, Clayey soil with f vegetation and root penetration LEAN CLAY with varying amounts of SAND (CL1. N 10/12" 12 112 brown, red brown, tan, hard to medium stiff 8.0 H 8/12" 8710 15 109 Claystone/SILTSTONE, slightly sandy to sandy, 10.0 olive -tan, grey, rust, hard 50/9" 15 114 _, a Boring Terminated at 10 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In -situ, the transition may be gradual. Hammer Type. Automatic Advancement Method: 4 -inch diameter solid flight auger See Exploration and Testing Procedures for a description of field and laboratory procedures used and additional data (If any). See Supporting Informatior for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. Notes. Abandonment Method: Bonng backfilled with soil cuttings after delayed water levels were measured. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS erracon 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont, CO Boring Started: 03-22-2018 Boring Completed: 03-22-2018 None encountered after completion of drilling Drill Rig CME-45 Driller ODELL Dry cave-in at 8 feet when measured on 4/2/2018 Project No. 22185003 co cD w F - Q 2 w H Q F- Q 0 0 U Q cx Cr a c J U 4 U- x w O w 0 4 O 0 U) co C\1 - C• I GEO SMART LOG -NO WELl Cr 0 a w 2 Q z C9 Cr O O Cr I- 0 w H Q Cr Q a w IL 0 J Q H- O 0 O J z 0 cn cn BORING LOG NO. TB -28 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility CLIENT: Indianapolis, Scannell Properties Indiana SITE: Town SE of E. of I-25 Mead, Frontage Colorado Road and WCR 36 GRAPHIC LOG LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 40.24102' Longitude: -104.9735' DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft. ) DEPTH (Ft.) WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS SAMPLE TYPE FIELD TEST RESULTS SWELL-CONSOL / LOAD, (`)/0 / psf) UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (psf) WATER CONTENT (%) DRY UNIT WEIGHT (pcf) ATTERBERG LIMITS PERCENT FINES LL -PL -PI _ _ SOIL LAYER, Clayey soil with fr/?rVEGETATIVE vegetation and root penetration / LEAN CLAY with varying amounts of SAND (CL). 9/12" +3.0/200 14 110 41-18-23 75 lao brown, light brown, rust, medium stiff y 8/12" 15 113 Claystone/SILTSTONE, slightly sandy to sandy. • 50/8" 16 113 olive -tan, rust, hard grey, 10.0 Boring Terminated at 10 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In -situ, the transition may be gradual. Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method: 4 -inch diameter solid flight auger See Exploration and Testing Procedures for a description of field and laboratory procedures used and additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. Notes: Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with soil cuttings after delayed water levels were measured. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS lerrac:ori 1242 Bramwood P1 Longmont, CO Boring Started: 03-22-2018 Boring Completed: 03-22-2018 None encountered after completion of drilling Drill Rig: CME-45 Driller ODELL Dry cave-in at 8 feet when measured on 4/2/2018 Project No. 22185003 co N. I- 0 0 w (ICJ 2 w H Q H Oi 0 CC w H GEO SMART LOG -NO WELL 22185003 MEAD FEDEX FACILI THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT BORING LOG NO. TB -29 Page 1 1 of PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility CLIENT: Indianapolis, Scannell Properties Indiana SITE: Town SE of E. I-25 of Mead, Frontage Colorado Road and WCR 36 GRAPHIC LOG LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 40.24078' Longitude: -104.97771 Approximate Surface Elev: 4957.8 (Ft.) +/- DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) DEPTH (Ft.) WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS SAMPLE TYPE FIELD TEST RESULTS SWELL-CONSOL LOAD, (% / psf) UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (psf) WATER CONTENT (%) DRY UNIT WEIGHT (pcf) ATTERBERG LIMITS PERCENT FINES LL -PL -PI 5 VEGETATIVE SOIL LAYER, Clayey 57.5+/r — ' f I . • , /. • ,14.0 soil with 1 vegetation and root penetration LEAN CLAY with varying amounts of SAND (CL). brown, rust to brown, light soft brown, tan, medium stiff to 4944+/ - 10/12" 15 107 5- — H K-4/12" 4/12" 18 104 +0.0/500 21 103 1 15- _ 7/12" 1050 21 106 SANDY LEAN CLAY to CLAYEY SAND (CL/SC). silty. olive -tan. grey. medium stiff/loose to medium dense 4938.5+/- 23/12" 18 110 X19.5 Claystone/SILTSTONE, slightly sandy to sandy, olive, 2� -. grey, rust. weathered 4936+/- z _ X122.0 L Claystone/SILTSTONE, slightly sandy to sandy, •� olive -tan. grey, rust, yellow brown. very hard 25.0 4933+/- : 4 50/3" 15 117 may 2504 Boring Terminated at 25 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In -situ, the transition may be gradual. Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method: 4 -inch diameter solid flight auger See Exploration description and additional See Supporting symbols and Elevation was enfyneers of field abbreviations. lnvpl and Testing Procedures for a and laboratory procedures used data (If any). Information for explanation of measured in the field using an and rnd Notes: Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with soil cuttings after delayed water levels were measured. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS erracon 1242 Bramwood P1 Longmont, CO Bonng Started: 06-28-2018 Boring Completed: 06-28-2018 14 feet after completion of drilling Drill Rig: CME-45 Driller ODELL 13.5 feet when measured on 7/6/2018 Project No. 22185003 co r I- 0 w F- a. w F— < I- 0 CC w ►- 13 J LL ci U- 0 0 0 In co N N -J > 0 O J I- Q 2 U) 0 w CD THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. BORING LOG NO. TB -30 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility CLIENT: Indianapolis, Scannell Properties Indiana SITE: Town SE of E. I-25 of Mead, Frontage Colorado Road and WCR 36 GRAPHIC LOG LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 40.24076' Longitude: -104.97639' Approximate Surface Elev 4958.2 (Ft.) +/- DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) DEPTH (Ft.) WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS SAMPLE TYPE FIELD TEST RESULTS SWELL-CONSOL / LOAD, (°/0 / psf) UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (psf) WATER CONTENT (%) DRY UNIT WEIGHT (pcf) ATTERBERG LIMITS PERCENT FINES LL -PL -PI a' ' ' 5 VEGETATIVE SOIL LAYER, Clayey soil with • Z./ A vegetation and root penetration LEAN CLAY with varying amounts of SAND (CL). light brown to olive -tan, medium stiff 8.0 4950+/- 10/12" 10 106 7/12" +0.2/500 _ 22 104 84 Claystone/SILTSTONE, slightly sandy to sandy. olive -tan, grey, rust, medium hard to very hard 4928+;- •aria 37/12" +0.7/1000 15 117 . •,�7. • 50/9" 16 112 . • 40/12" 18 112 � _ 2$ • Sea sue' • 50/6" 16 118 . . See • S'aS . FAtO a 50/5" 14 120 s 430.0 3 $ Boring Terminated at 30 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In -situ, the transition may be gradual. Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method: 4 -inch diameter solid flight auger See Exploration and Testing Procedures for a description of field and laboratory procedures used and additional data (If any). Notes: See Supporting symbols and Elevation was nginee?s abbreviations. tkvpt Information for explanation of measured in the field using an and rnri Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with soil cuttings after delayed water levels were measured. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS erracon 1242 Bramwood P1 Longmont, CO Boring Started: 06-28-2018 Boring Completed: 06-28-2018 18 feet after completion of drilling Drill Rig: CME-45 Driller ODELL " 16 feet when measured on 7/6/2018 Project No.: 22185003 F- 0 H .51 2 LL H H Q 0 O H O J Q LL w CU w LL 0 w 2 O O co N J J O O CCQ V/ O O F- O a w a J Q z_ C� O 0 Ll C W H Q Q a w LL 0 J Q F- O z C7 O J z 0 H BORING LOG NO. TB -31 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility CLIENT: Indianapolis, Scannell Properties Indiana SITE: Town SE of E. of I-25 Mead, Frontage Colorado Road and WCR 36 GRAPHIC LOG LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 40.24039` Longitude: -104.97509' Approximate Surface Elev: 4957.5 (Ft.) +/- DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) DEPTH (Ft.) WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS SAMPLE TYPE FIELD TEST RESULTS SWELL-CONSOL LOAD, (`)/0 / psf) UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (psf) WATER CONTENT (%) DRY UNIT WEIGHT (pcf) PERCENT FINES ATTERB LIMITS LL -PL -PI SOIL LAYER. Clayey soil with457+/rvegetation — — H_ PD-5-\VEGETATWE / • •` /14.0 and root penetration LEAN CLAY with varying amounts of SAND (CL). brown, red brown to olive -brown, rust, very stiff to soft 4943.5+/- 9/12" +0.8/500 14 110 71 5 6/12" 5100 16 112 N 4/12" +0.0/1000 18 109 58 M 10— 15-- -y _ Claystone/SILTSTONE, slightly sandy to sandy. 35/12" 17 116 olive -tan. grey, rust, firm to medium hard 22.0 4935.5+/- - - .;.� - ..: • 50/10" 14 116 +� --s 20- _— J 25)4 •; :• :. : Sandstone/SILTSTONE, slightly clayey, olive -tan, rust. very hard. fine grained, poorly to moderately cemented 4932.5+/- ::.r: , 50/5" 22 106 ~ ~ - .:-::.25.0 Boring Terminated at 25 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In -situ, the transition may be gradual. Hammer Type Automatic Advancement Method: 4 -inch diameter solid flight auger See Exploration and Testing Procedures for a description of field and laboratory procedures used and additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. Elevation was measured in the field using an eneineer'41evill and girl Notes: Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with soil cuttings after delayed water levels were measured. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS I!rraCc:111Drill 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont, CO Bonng Started: 06-28-2018 Boring Completed: 06-28-2018 = 13 feet after completion of drilling Rig: CME-45 9 Driller ODELL 12.5 feet when measured on 7/6/2018 Project No.. 22185003 co N- CD w F- Q J 2 w Q OI z O or w a O Q u_ w C lL C LU z C" 0 0 U) co NJ J J w O O J F- a a 2 cn w O THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT BORING LOG NO. TB ...... -32 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility CLIENT: Indianapolis, Scannell Properties Indiana SITE: I Town SE of E. of 1-25 Mead, Frontage Colorado Road and WCR 36 GRAPHIC LOG LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 40.24048' Longitude: -104.9744° DEPTH (Ft.) WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS SAMPLE TYPE FIELD TEST RESULTS SWELL-CONSOL i LOAD, (°/0 / psf) UNCONFINFD COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (psf) WATER CONTENT (%) DRY UNIT WEIGHT (pcf) ATTERBERG LIMITS PERCENT FINES LL -PL -PI Approxmate Surface Elev- 4956.4 (Ft.) +/- DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) 1 • >> 5 956+/r — -' VEGETATIVE SOIL LAYER, Clayey soil with vegetation and root penetration LEAN CLAY with varying amounts of SAND (CL), • brown, red brown, rust, medium stiff to soft 6.5 4950+1- 5/12" 13 -' - 14/12" 20 104 -_- Claystone/SILTSTONE, slightly to sandy sandy. olive-brownrust, highly = weathered ` — 9.0 4947.5+/- 33/12" +0.3/500 17 114 Claystone/SILTSTONE, slightly sandy to sandy, olive, 10- 15- - — rust, firm ; atsl, '! } 13.0 494354- :• �:.. Sandstone/SILTSTONE, slightly clayey, olive -tan, rust, ::• hard to hard, fine 50/6" 17 . !-•.. • very grained. poorly cemented — � 7.0 4939.5+/- - .�' m C!aystone/SILTSTONE, slightly sandy to sandy, olive, r. _ ' grey rust. very hard 50/4" +0.1/1000 15 113 a.r 2 a — — — 25— t • t,as 24.0 4932.5+/- 50/3" �. ; • slightly clayey, -tan, .Sandstone/SILTSTONE, olive rust. • - . ::: !' very hard, fine grained. poorly to moderately cemented 3o- ... ri .� ..rte !: . 50/4" 30.0 4926.54 Boring Terminated at 30 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In -situ, the transition may be gradual. Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method: 4 -inch diameter solid flight auger See Exploration description of field and additional See Supporting symbols and abbreviations. Elevation was engineers ifavpi and Testing Procedures for a and laboratory procedures used data (If any). Information for explanation of measured in the field using an and rnd Notes Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with soil cuttings after delayed water levels were measured. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS erracon 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont, CO Boring Started: 06-28-2018 Boring Completed: 06-28-2018 = 9 feet after completion of drilling Drill Rig: CME-45 Driller ODELL 8 feet when measured on 7/6/2018 Project No: 22185003 CO F- 2 w I- Q S F- Q z 0 or H CD 7.3 w a u_ a S 0 O cc N N J J 0 a O F- LI Q 5 0 w 0 F- 0 a w J Q z C LI 0 2 0 LI w O w F- Q LI Q a w v7 CD Q I- O CD O CD LI 0 z H BORING LOG NO. TB -33 Page 1 1 of PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility CLIENT: Indianapolis, Scannell Properties Indiana SITE: Town SE of E. of I-25 Mead, Frontage Colorado Road and WCR 36 GRAPHIC LOG LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 40.23996' Longitude: -104.97545' Approximate Surface Elev. 4950.6 (Ft.) +/- DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) DEPTH (Ft.) WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS SAMPLE TYPE FIELD TEST RESULTS SWELL-CONSOL / LOAD, (% / psf) UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (psf) WATER CONTENT (%) DRY UNIT WEIGHT (pcf) ATTERBERG LIMITS PERCENT FINES LL -PL -PI 5 VEGETATIVE SOIL LAYER, Clayey soil with 950+/,1 - Pt /, 7, / ,/ • vegetation and root penetration LEAN CLAY with varying amounts of SAND (CL). silty, light brown, red brown to olive, rust, stiff to soft 14 .0 4936.5+/- 10/12" +0.9/500 12 115 5/12" 2440 15 111 4/12" +0.0/500 17 110 N , 10- J 12/12" 23 104 ••f �� / • • SANDY LEAN CLAY to CLAYEY SAND (CL/SC), light brown. olive -tan, stiff/loose. with SILTY, CLAYEY 1 - grey, SAND lenses 27.0 4923.5+/- 13/12" 19 108 20- 14/12" 24 25 — Claystone/SILTSTONE. slightly sandy to sandy. olive. . grey, hard 30.0 4920.5+/- : 50/7" 18 116 -�� 30 Boring Terminated at 30 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In -situ. the transition may be gradual. Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method: 4 -inch diameter solid flight auger See Exploration and Testing Procedures for a description of field and laboratory procedures used and additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. Elevation was measured in the field using an engines level and rnd Notes: Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with soil cuttings after delayed water levels were measured. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS erracon 1242 Bramwood P1 Longmont, CO Boring Started: 06-28-2018 Boring Completed: 06-28-2018 = 13 feet after completion of drilling Drill Rig CME-45 Duller ODELL Dry cave-in at 7 feet when measured on 7/6/2018 Project No 22185003 cc 0 H Q w Q 0 of CC a J_ U a X 0 w w w 2 co 0 0 U) co N J O Z H Cr Q 2 0 w 0 THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FRCM ORIGINAL REPORT. BORING LOG NO. TB ..,...... -34 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility CLIENT: Indianapolis, Scannell Properties Indiana SITE: Town SE of E. of I-25 Mead, Frontage Colorado Road and WCR 36 GRAPHIC LOG LOCATION See Exploration Plan Lattude: 40.23965 Longitude: -104.97605' Approximate Surface Elev 4950.0 (Ft.) +/- DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) DEPTH (Ft.) WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS SAMPLE TYPE FIELD TEST RESULTS SWELL-CONSOL / LOAD, (°/0 / psi) UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (psf) WATER CONTENT (%) DRY UNIT WEIGHT (pcf) PERCENT FINES A l I ERBERG LIMITS LL -PL -PI i I3 5 5+/r VEGETATIVE SOIL LAYER, Clayey soil with 4144 1 vegetation and root penetration / LEAN CLAY with varying amounts of SAND (CL). �• , ":/ 4 %� /, / �•' .17.0 brown, red brown, beige to light medium stiff, SILTY, CLAYEY brown. olive -brown, rust, SAND lenses with depth 4933+/- 9/12" 13 111 N - 6/12" +0.0/500 18 108 62 N N 8/12" 2C 98 10-- - - 8/12" 24 101 15- 20- — - = Claystone/SILTSTONE, slightly to . sandy sandy, : "� olive -tan, grey, rust, hard to very hard C' 50/8" 13 120 - ff4 25- H 50/6" 15 117 • 3 0 • • _ 50/7" 15 1 18 �- 30.0 4920+/- .- Boring Terminated at 30 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In -situ. the transition may be gradual. Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method: 4 -inch diameter solid flight auger See Exploration descnption and additional See Supporting symbols and Elevation was nnaineers levnl and Testing Procedures for a of field and laboratory procedures used data (If any). Information for explanation of abbreviations. measured in the field using an and rnri Notes: Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with soil cuttings after delayed water levels were measured. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS erracon 1242 Bramwood P1 Longmont, CO Bonng Started: 06-28-2018 Boring Completed: 06-28-2018 None encountered after completion of drilling Drill Rig: CME-45 Driller: ODELL 14.5 feet when measured on 7/6/2018 Project No. 22185003 co r I- 0 w F- Q J 2 w z O U CC w a Cp J U- X C w U - C w 2 C? G C In co N N J J w C J I- CC Q 5 0 w 0 THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT BORING LOG NO. TB -35 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility CLIENT: Indianapolis, Scannell Properties Indiana SITE: Town SE of E. of I-25 Mead, Frontage Colorado Road and WCR 36 GRAPHIC LOG See Exploration Plan Latitude: 40.23935' Longitude: -104.97548' Approximate Surface Elev: 4946.5 (Ft.) +/- DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) DEPTH (Ft.) WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS SAMPLE TYPE FIELD TEST RESULTS SWELL-CONSOL LOAD, (% / psf) UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (psf) WATER CONTENT (%) DRY UNIT WEIGHT (pcf) ATTERBERG LIMITS PERCENT FINES LL -PL -PI 3.>` 5 VEGETATIVE SOIL LAYER; Clayey soil with[4946+& — — '{' . 7// /4 / ✓ / 1 vegetation and root penetration LEAN CLAY with varying amounts of SAND (CU , brown, rust to light brown, olive medium stiff 18.0 -brown. very stiff to 4928.5+/- 6/12" 5480 20 105 N N 8/12" +0.0/500 20 107 8/11 1560 19 109 1 a W 10/12" +0.1/500 16 114 NE— 1 5- — _ Claystone/SILTSTONE. slightly sandy to sandy, . olive -tan. rust, hard to very hard 25.0 4921.5+/- 50/7" 14 120 V "�. 20- - . s. . ._ s� 50/6" 14 120 2 5 Boring Terminated at 25 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In -situ, the transition may be gradual. Hammer Type.. Automatic Advancement Method: 4 -inch diameter solid flight auger See Exploration description and additional See Supporting symbols and Elevation was erjnee?s 1PVPl and of field and data Information abbreviations. measured and Testing Procedures for a laboratory procedures used (If any). for explanation of in the field using an and Notes: Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with soil cuttings after delayed water levels were measured. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS erracon 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont, CO Bonng Started: 06-28-2018 Boring Completed: 06-28-2018 SL 20 feet after completion of drilling Drill Rig: CME-45 Driller ODELL N 12 feet when measured on 7/6/2018 Project No.. 22185003 CO r 0 w I Q cL 0� 0 cx w F- C J U Q U- 0 w U- Q cn C) 0 co (TN - _J N cb 0 I- Q cn 0 0 w cx J Q z_ 0 0 u_ 0 eC F - Q Q a_ w w a Q H 0 z U) 0 9_1 z 0 co I - BORING LOG NO. TB -36 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility CLIENT: Indianapolis, Scannell Properties Indiana SITE: Town SE of E. of I-25 Mead, Frontage Colorado Road and WCR 36 GRAPHIC LOG LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 40.23886' Longitude: -104.97559° Approximate Surface Elev: 4944.6 (Ft.) +/- DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) DEPTH (Ft.) WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS SAMPLE TYPE FIELD TEST RESULTS SWELL-CONSOL / LOAD, (% / psf) UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (psf) WATER CONTENT (°,/u) DRY UNIT WEIGHT (pcf) PERCENT FINES ATTERBERG LIMITS LL -PL -PI 5 — — _ VEGETATIVE SOIL LAYER, Clayey soil with /4944+1 \vegetation and root penetration LEAN CLAY with varying amounts of SAND (CL). red / • /' /• , , brown, orange brown to light brown, olive. medium stiff 14.0 4930.5+/ 5/12" +0.6/500 16 111 5-- H 8/12" 1980 16 108 6/12" +0.1/500 8 110 66 10--. SANDY LEAN CLAY to CLAYEY SAND (CL/SC). light 2/12" 26 Li brown, olive -tan. grey. very soft to very stiff/very loose to medium dense, with SILTY, CLAYEY SAND lenses 35.0 4909.5+/- 15— 4/12" 23 24-18-6 55 20— 8/12" 24 101 25— H 23/12" 15 113 30-- - 40 _ SILTY to CLAYEY SAND (SC-SM, SC). interlayered, light brown, olive -grey, trace fine GRAVEL 40.0 4904.5+1- Boring Terminated at 40 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In -situ, the transition may be gradual. Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method: 4 -inch diameter solid flight auger See Exploration and Testing Procedures for a descnption of field and laboratory procedures used and additional data (If any). Notes: See Supporting symbols and Elevation was PncynPPeS abbreviations. level Information for explanation of measured in the field using an and rod Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with soil cuttings after delayed water levels were measured. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS 1�rracc,'i 1242 Longmont, Bramwood PI CO Bonng Started: 06-28-2018 Boring Completed: 06-28-2018 13 feet after completion of drilling Drill Rig: CME-45 g Driller. ODELL Dry cave-in at 8.5 feet when measured on 7/6/2013 Project No.. 22185003 co r a CD H a 2 H Q H Q Z O Q Cr w I J C.) Q LL X w O w LL C Q w 2 c'') O O a.) N N -J J w 0 CD O Cr Q 2 0 w C9 H 0 a_ w Cr J Q Z_ Fr - 0 Cr w C w Q CC Q a- w LL C J Q H 0 CD O J Cr 0 cn BORING LOG NO. -37 Page 1 of 1 TB PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility CLIENT: Indianapolis, Scannell Properties Indiana SITE: SE Town of E. of I-25 Mead, Frontage Colorado Road and WCR 36 GRAPHIC LOG LOCATION See Explore:ion Plar Latitude 40.23943' Longitude. -104.97734' DEPTH ELEVATION (ft.) DEPTH (Ft.) WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS SAMPLE TYPE FIELD TEST RESULTS SWELL-CONSOL I LOAD, (`)/0 / psf) UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (psf) WATER CONTENT (To) DRY UNIT WEIGHT (pcf) ATTERBERG LIMITS PERCENT FINES LL -PL -PI • � VEGETATIVE SOIL LAYER, Clayey soil with •{' -A ,1 ,. , Ijiao1 vegetation and root penetration LEAN CLAY with varying amounts of SAND (CL),IN-710/12" +3.0/200 15 113 38-17-21 83 brown, rust to light brown, olive. tan/beige, stiff to medium stiff 9/12" 14 115 41"/12"2910 21 103 Boring Terminated at 10 Feet a Stratification lines are approximate. In -situ, the transition may be gradual. Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method: 4 -inch diameter solid flight auger See Exploration and Testing Procedures for a description of field and laboratory procedures used and additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation cf symbols and abbreviations. Notes: Abandonment Method: Bonng backfilled with soil cuttings after delayed water levels were measured. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS erracon 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont, CO Bonng Started: 06-28-2018 Boring Completed: 06-28-2018 None encountered after completion of drilling Drill Rig: CME-45 Duller. ODELL Dry cave-in at 9 feet when measured on 7/6/2018 Project No.: 22185003 co N- r- a 0 w F- C J F- Q F- a 0 z C U Q cr cr w I- a C J U Q a X w O w w C Q O O U7 oa r - N N J w O z GEO SMART CC C a w a J C z_ EM O 2 0 cc LL 0 w F- C a C a w w 0 J Q I- O z CD O J z CD co (I) F - BORING LOG NO. -38 Page 1 of 1 TB PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility CLIENT: Indianapolis, Scannell Properties Indiana SITE: SE Town of E. of I-25 Mead, Frontage Colorado Road and WCR 36 GRAPHIC LOG v O a D H a a Z W CO fD (D m o -6 (� o c a c) o 2 Cr) m r D O Z m DEPTH (Ft.) WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS SAMPLE TYPE FIELD TEST RESULTS SWELL-CONSOL / LOAD, (% / psf) UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (psf) WATER CONTENT (%) DRY UNIT WEIGHT (pcf) I ATTERBERG PERCENT FINES LIMITS LL -PL -PI A� 15 VEGETATIVE SOIL LAYER, Clayey soil with 10 5 • !' �• %10.0 A / vegetation and root penetration N LEAN CLAY with varying amounts of SAND (CL),H 6/12" +1.7/200 14 107 brown, rust to orange brown, light brown. tan/beige, stiff to soft — 4/12" 15 113 9/12" 2850 18 108 Boring Terminated at 10 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In -situ, the transition may be gradual. Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method: 4 -inch diameter solid flight auger See Exploration description and additional See Supporting symbols and and Testing of field and laboratory data (If any). Procedures for a procedures used for explanation of Notes: Information abbreviations. Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with soil cuttings after delayed water levels were measured. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS 1?rra 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont, CO Boring Started: 06-28-2018 Boring Completed: 06-28-2018 None encountered after completion of drilling Drill Rig: CME-45 Driller ODELL Dry cave-in at 9 feet when measured on 7/6/2018 Project No.: 22185003 co r 0 w I- a w Q F- Q 0 i z O U Q Q! W F- a J_ 0 Q LL x W 0 w LL 0 Q w cn O O lf) co N N GEO SMART LOG -NO WELT THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. BORING LOG NO. -39 Page 1 of 1 TB PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility CLIENT: Indianapolis, Scannell Properties Indiana SITE: SE Town of E. of I-25 Mead, Frontage Colorado Road and WCR 36 GRAPHIC LOG r m a > cn H o Z ca) co N (n 2 ° fD r m o .e co� . o E n CD 5 D a I rn o~ O m r m D O z m DEPTH (Ft.) WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS SAMPLE TYPE FIELD TEST RESULTS SWELL-CONSOL / LOAD, (°/0 / psf) UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (psf) WATER CONTENT (°/°) DRY UNIT WEIGHT (pcf) D r r� r _m v.)mm O PERCENT FINES {'V Clayey 4 '; VEGETATIVE SOIL LAYER. soil with 10 10.0 vegetation and root penetration LEAN CLAY with varying amounts of SAND (CL1.Dell 8/12" 10 36-16-20 77 brown, rust to light brown, tan/beige, olive, medium stiff very stiff to J N 6/12" 13 112 9/12" 6830 17 112 Boring Terminated at 10 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In -situ, the transition may be gradual. Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method: 4 -inch diameter solid flight auger See Exploration and Testing Procedures for a description of field and laboratory procedures used and additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation Hil symbols and abbreviations. Notes: Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with soil cuttings after delayed water levels were measured. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS erracon 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont. CO Boring Started: 06-28-2018 Boring Completed: 06-28-2018 None encountered after completion of drilling Drill Rig: CME-45 Driller ODELL Dry cave-in at 8.5 feet when measured on 7/6/2018 Project No 22185003 co 0 w H- Q 2 w Q F Q O 0 Q cc w I- LL 22185003 MEAD FEEHX FACILI.GP' GEO SMART LOG -NO W THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT BORING LOG NO. -40 s Page 1 of 1 TB PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility CLIENT: Indianapolis, Scannell Properties Indiana SITE: SE of Town E. of 1-25 Mead, Frontage Colorado Road and WCR 36 GRAPHIC LOG o r r in O (1)D Os O Z co v Cn N fD o CD r m o -o (C 5- E a cD O' J IR to v cn 0 in r m 0 z m DEPTH (Ft.) WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS SAMPLE TYPE FIELD TEST RESULTS SWELL-CONSOL / LOAD, (°/0 / psf) UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (psf) WATER CONTFNT(%) DRY UNIT WEIGHT (pcf) PERCENT FINES ATTERBERG LIMITS LL -PL -PI y s VEGETATIVE SOIL LAYER, Clayey soil with 1 5 Vii 7;7 /., lf l / 10.0 vegetation and root penetration H N LEAN CLAY with varying amounts of SAND (CL). dark 13/12" +1.2/200 19 108 41-15-26 76 brown, soft, SILTY, brown to orange brown, tanibeige, very stiff to CLAYEY SAND lenses with depth 12 8/ " 77 4 0 21 104 4/12" 23 102 Boring Terminated at 10 Feet a Stratification lines are approximate. In -situ, the transition may be gradual. Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method: 4 -inch diameter solid flight auger See Exploration and Testing Procedures for a description of field and laboratory procedures used and additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. Notes: Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with soil cuttings after delayed water levels were measured. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS lerracori 1242 Bramwood P1 Longmont, CO Boring Started: 06-28-2018 Boring Completed: 06-28-2018 None encountered after completion of drilling Rig: CME-45 Driller ODELL Dry cave-in at 9.0 feet when measured on 7/6/2013Drill Project No. 22185003 co r r 0 w H C H Q H Q 0 0 Q cr w O U Q w x w 0 w w 0 Q w r L co 0 0 U) co r N N GEO SMART LOG -NO H 0 0 W cr J Q z_ 0 2 0 0 as, a— < Q a w U- 0 Q H O U) O 9J 0 z m z H BORING LOG NO. -41 Page 1 of 1 TB PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility CLIENT: Indianapolis, Scannell Properties Indiana SITE: SE Town of E. of I-25 Mead, Frontage Colorado Road and WCR 36 GRAPHIC LOG 0 ° O See Exploration Plan 40.23965' Longitude -104.97445' ELEVATION (Ft.) DEPTH (Ft.) WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS SAMPLE TYPE FIELD TEST RESULTS SWELL-CONSOL LOAD, (`)/0 / psf) UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (psf) 1 WATER CONTENT (%) DRY UNIT WEIGHT (pcf) D r r r _ —i co m O PERCENT FINES 5 VEGETATIVE SOIL LAYER. Clayey soil with 10 5 �' >I � • /100 I \vegetation and root penetration HP LEAN CLAY with varying amounts of SAND (CL}, light -5/12" 15 108 36-14-22 70 brown to orange brown/rust, light brown. tan/beige, soft medium stiff to so t N 7/12" 17 H 2/12" 950 21 105 Boring at 10 Feet Terminated Stratification lines are approximate. In -situ, the transition may be gradual. Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method: 4 -inch diameter solid flight auger See Exploration and Testing Procedures for a description of field and laboratory procedures used and additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. Notes: Abandonment Method. Boring backfilled with soil cuttings after delayed water levels were measured. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS erracon 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont, CO Bonng Started: 06-28-2018 Boring Completed: 06-28-2018 None encountered after completion of drilling Drill Rig: CME-45 Driller: ODELL N 8 feet when measured on 7/6/2018 Project No. 22185003 SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST co r 0 w F_ Q J a w H Q F - Q 0 z 0 J Q cc w F 0 _J U Q L_ X 0 w w 0 w Cr, O O to c0 ni STRAIN S -NO ASTM r Cr) z 0 H F - cc 0 a w It s z rr 0 2 0 w H Q It Q w rn w O J Q H 0 z w It Q U) H w H It 0 >- F- CC CO J A 100 Out IAL STRAIN 105 1,000 PRESSURE, psf 10,000 Specimen Identification Classification Yd, pcf WC, % • I TB -1 3-4ft SANDY LEANCLAY(CL) 112 15 NOTES: Sample exhibited 0.8 percent expansion upon wetting under an applied pressure of 500 psf. PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility erracon 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont. CO Long PROJECT NUMBER: 22185003 SITE: SE of E. 1-25 Fron:age Road and WCR 36 Town of Mead, Colorado CLIENT: Scannell Properties Indianapolis. Indiana SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST op r H 0 w H C J 0 W H C H C C I z O '3 Q w H d C^ J C LL X W C W LL C C w S ct) O In cc (N N H C) O z U 6L N H/^ v/ J 0 cn O J C)i H H 0 a LLJ cc J C z 0 0 LU C U) LL J C H C z C U, H w H 0 H 0 C J AXIAL STRAIN, % ----.-----'-\\ 100 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE, psf 105 Specimen Identification Classification Yd, pcf WC, % • TB -1 9 - 10 ft SANDY LEAN CLAY(CL) 99 22 NOTES: Sample exhibited 0.1 percent expansion upon wetting under an applied pressure of 500 psf. PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility lierracon 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont. CO PROJECT NUMBER: 22185003 SITE: SE of E. 1-25 Frontage Road and WCR 36 Town of Mead. Colorado CLIENT Scannell Properties Indianapolis. Indiana SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST CO r N- I_ 0 w I- C J a 2 w H C H C 0 z 0 C CC C w H 0 J J Q IL tl C w w 0 crs w c op N 2 C 0 z U U) Q C U) J 0 U) 4- 0 U� H 0 a w CC J C z (Y 0 2 0 w H C Cr w LL 0 J C H 0 z w lx C U) >- cr 0 H w H H cc 0 co J 100 IAL STRAII 105 1,000 PRESSURE, psf 10,000 r Specimen Identification Classification Yd, pcf WC, % • TB -2 6 - 7 ft SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL) 106 19 NOTES: Sample exhibited 0.1 percent expansion upon wetting under an applied pressure of 500 psf. PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility erracon 12`12 Bramwood PI Long Longmont. CO PROJECT NUMBER: 22185003 SITE: SE of E. I-25 Frontage Road and WCR 36 Town of Mead. Colorado CLIENT: Scannell Properties Indianapolis. Indiana ..r SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST w I Q J a 2 w Q F- Q 0 i z 0 U Q CL CC w F- CL ^) 0 U Q LL X w C w LL 0 Q w 2 M J 0 co r N N I O) Q 0 z Ch U) Q CC H Co O En z 0 C..) ;.) F- 0 CL w CC J Q z 5 0 2 CC 0 Q cL Q w U) LL O J Q H 0 cc w Q (I) H w I >- 0 0m a J 100 , IAL STRAIN I _ y I 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE, psf 105 Specimen Identification Classification Yd, pcf WC, %i 1 • TB -3 9 - 10 ft SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL) 110 15 NOTES: exhibited 0.1 percent expansion upon wetting under an applied pressure of 500 psf. Sample PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility erracon 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont . CO PROJECT NUMBER: 22185003 SITE: SE of E. I-25 Frontage Road and WCR 36 Town of Mead. Colorado CLIENT: Scannell Properties Indianapolis. Indiana SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST act NL H O w J 0 2 w H Q H Q O� z 0 C a' w H a U J U w x w O w w Q w 2 M 0 Q a: h (N H Q C z U U) R Q a' H U) J 0 U) G 0 UI H I - a' O a_ w pc J Q z C IY 0 O w H Q a' Q w LL 0 Q cn H 0 z w a' Q H w H 0 H a' m J 100 IAL STRAIN 105 1,000 PRESSURE, psf 10,000 Specimen Identification Classification I Ye, pcf 1 WC, % TB -4 3 - 4 ft I LEAN CLAY with SAND (CL) 112 16 NOTES: Sample exhibited 1.2 percent expansion upon wetting under an applied pressure of 500 psf. PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility lierracon 1242 Bramwood PI Long Longmont. CO PROJECT NUMBER: 22185003 SITE: SE of E. 1-25 Frontage Road and WCR 36 Town of Mead. Colorado CLIENT' Scannell Properties Indianapolis, Indiana SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST a) I- 0 w H Q J w I- Q H Q 0 I z 0 J Q LI w H CL. U U U- X w a w w a Q w 2 cv) 0 0 co 1 H (n Q 0 z th U (n R Q LI H (n J 0 (n z 0 U U H H 0 a. w J Q rz C.) LI 0 0 0 w Q w U) 0 Q H 0 z w Q (n H co I- 0 H ce 0 cn J 100 IAL STRAIN 105 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE. psf Specimen Identification Classification 'Yd, pcf WC, Vol • TB -4 14 - 15 ft SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL) 105 23 NOTES: Sample exhibited no movement upon wetting under an applied pressure of 500 psf. lierracon 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont, CO PROJECT NUMBER: 22185003 PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility SITE: SE of E. 1-25 Frontage Road and WCR 36 Town of Mead. Colorado CLIENT: Scannell Properties Indianapolis, Indiana SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST co I- 0 w H C J a 2 w H C }-- < I Z 0 U w H a 0 J U C w X U.1 n w U G Q w 2 M O O LU co N N 2 (I) C C U Y ti J Q C U H LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID iF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT 100 IAL STRAIN 105 1,000 PRESSURE. psf 10,000 Specimen Identification Classification 'Yd, pcf WC, % • TB -5 3 - 4 ft SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL) 111 13 NOTES: Sample exhibited 2.1 percent expansion upon wetting under an applied pressure of 500 psf. PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility erracon 1242 Bramwood PI mont. CO Longmont. PROJECT NUMBER: 22185003 SITE: SE of E. I-25 Frontage Road and WCR 36 Town of Mead. Colorado CLIENT: Scannell Properties Indianapolis. Indiana SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST CO r- < J a. w Q H C z 0 cc H 0 U LL X W C W LL O C CN 5 0 C cv 2 H Q 0 ch U 7 C H cn 0 0 U I U H LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT 100 IAL STRAIN 105 1,000 PRESSURE. psf 10,000 Specimen Identification Classification 'Yd, pcf WC, % • TB -5 6 - 7 ft Claystone/SILTSTONE; slightly sandy to sandy 116 16 NOTES: Sample exhibited 2.3 percent expansion upon wetting under an applied pressure of 750 psf. PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility erracon 1242 Bramwood PI Long Longmont. CO PROJECT NUMBER: 22185003 SITE: SE of E. I-25 Frontage Road and WCR 36 Town of Mead, Colorado CLIENT: Scannell Properties Indianapolis, Indiana SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST CO r r I_ O w H Q J a w H Q H 0 0 XcC H a p J U Q w C_ w w a Q w n 0 at N H cr 0 ch cn U cc cn J 0 z 0 U H cr 0 a w J Q z_ 0 us 0 w I- Q CL Q w U) LL 0 Q H 0 z w Q 0) >- w H 0 H m Q J -- 100 IAL STRAIN 1,000 PRESSURE, psf 10,000 105 Specimen Identification Classification Yd , pcf WC, To • TB -5 9 - 10 ft Claystone/SILTSTONE; slightly sandy to sandy 106 17 NOTES: Sample exhibited 0.3 percent expansion upon wetting under an applied pressure of 500 psf. PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility erracon 1242 Bramwood PI Long Longmont. CO PROJECT NUMBER: 22185003 SITE: SE of E. I-25 Frontage Road and WCR 36 Town of Mead, Colorado CLIENT' Scannell Properties Indianapolis. Indiana SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST CO r H 0 w H J 0 w H Q H Q 0 z O Q w H a Cp J Q w w 0 w w 0 Q w c en tn O co r N N H U) Q O Z U Cr. Z CC H U) J O O U U H H 0 a- w J Q znn �.J 0 O 0 H Q Q a w U- 0 J Q F-- 0 z w Q cn w H >- 0 H m Q J AXIAL STRAIN, % I ^ O do a) a N Q Ni a co co a • A 105 1,000 PRESSURE. psf 10,000 Specimen Identification Classification Yd, pcf WC, % • 1 TB -6 3 - 4 ft LEAN CLAY with SAND (CL) 110 11 NOTES: Sample exhibited 0.8 percent expansion upon wetting under an applied pressure of 500 psf. PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility erracon 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont. CO PROJECT NUMBER: 22185003 i SITE: SE of E. I-25 Frontage Road and WCR 36 Town of Mead, Colorado CLIENT Scannell Properties Indianapolis. Indiana SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST r 0 w F_ C J a w F — C C C C C3 C cr w a. 0 J J IL X w C LL.; IL C C w ch LI N N F-- < O J R 2 r J 0 O U F— LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL RFPORT. A 41 100 L STRAIN S 105 1,000 PRESSURE. psf 10,000 Specimen Identification Classification Yd, pcf WC, % • TB -6 9 - 10 ft SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL) 113 15 NOTES: Sample exhibited 0.5 percent expansion upon wetting under an applied pressure of 500 psf. PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility erracon 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont. CO Long PROJECT NUMBER: 22185003 SITE: SE of E. I-25 Frontage Road and WCR 36 Tovin of Mead, Colorado CLIENT: Scannell Properties Indianapolis. ndiana SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST co N- I - 0 w H- J w H Q H Q O z 0 U Q X LX w H 9 J U Q w w O LL w O w M 0 In co r N cn G z U U) d H J 0 Cl) Z 0 U U H I — c 0 w X J Q z 0 0 CC 0 I- Q cn J Q H 0 cn w Q H w >- CC 0 H 0 Q J 100 h IAL STRAIN 1,000 PRESSURE, psf 10,000 105 Specimen Identification Classification t1, pcf WC, % • TB -7 6 - 7 ft SANDY LEAN CLAY(CL) 110 15 NOTES: Sample exhibited 0.3 percent expansion upon wetting under an applied pressure of 500 psf. PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility erracon 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont. CO PROJECT NUMBER: 22185003 SITE: SE of E. I-25 Frontage Road and WCR 36 Town of Mead, Colorado CLIENT: Scannell Properties Indianapolis.. Indiana SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST U) r 0 LU H J a Ui z Q H Q CI 0 J w H a U- X LU W U_ O Q w M 0 0 In cc N N H Co Q O z ch cn co J O v7 z 0 UI H H 0 a Ui a! J Q z c9 iz 0 0 w H Q a LU CE u_ O J Q H O z w a Q H LU H r a 0 H m Q J IAL STRAIN NIS 105 100 1,000 PRESSURE, osf 10,000 Specimen Identification Classification Yd , pcf WC, % • TB -7 14 - 15 ft SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL) 103 21 J NOTES: Sample exhibited no upon wetting under an applied pressure of 500 psf. movement PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility erracon 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont. CO PROJECT NUMBER: 22185003 SITE: SE of E. 1-25 Frontage Road and WCR 36 Town of Mead, Colorado CLIENT: Scannell Properties Indianapolis. Indiana SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST co I- 0 w F Q J n_ w I— Q I— Q 0 z O et NQ w p J U Q w X w O w w O Q w 2 O O 2 t - co Q 0 Z U R Z I` J 0 z Q OI U H LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. NIVH±S bbl y • 105 100 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE. psf Specimen Identification I Classification . Yd , pcf WC, % • I TB -8 3 - 4 ft 1 SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL) 114 13 NOTES: exhibited 0.7 percent expansion upon wetting under an applied pressure of 500 psf. Sample PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility errecon 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont, Co PROJECT NUMBER: 22185003 SITE: SE of E. I-25 Frontage Road and WCR 36 Town of Mead, Colorado CLIENT Scannell Properties Indianapolis. Indiana SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST co F - CU w H C J 2 w H H C CC z C w H 0 X C 0 C w M L7 x N N 2 H Cr G C z ch J R Z Q H J O U) z U t U H LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. 100 IAL STRAIN 1,000 PRESSURE, psf 10,000 105 Specimen Identification Classification Yd, pcf WC, % L• TB -8 9 - 10 ft ClaY stone/SILTSTONE with SAND 111 15 NOTES: Sample exhibited 0.7 percent expansion upon wetting under an applied pressure of 1,000 psf. PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility lierracon 1242 Bramwood P1 Longmont. CO PROJECT NUMBER: 22185003 SITE: SE of E. 1-25 Frontage Road and WCR 36 Town of Mead, Colorado r CLIENT: Scannell Properties Indianapolis. ndiana SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST H 0 w H J a 2 w H C F C 0 i z O U ui H d :0 J U C L W 0 W U- 0 Q C U, :V _V H N C 0 Z th U U, C H cn C Z O U H H 0 a w E z 3 0 0 0 w C C cn w U- 0 J C 0 z LL C cn w H >- 0 m 100 4 IAL STRAIN 1 , 105 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE, psf Specimen Identification Classification Yd, pcf WC, % • TB -9 3 - 4 ft SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL) 112 16 NOTES: Sample exhibited 0.2 percent expansion upon wetting under an applied pressure of 500 psf. PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility erracon 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont. CO PROJECT NUMBER: 22185003 SITE: SE of E. 1-25 Frontage Road and WCR 36 Town of Mead, Colorado CLIENT Scannell Properties Indianapolis. Indiana SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST H O L9 w H Q J a w H Q H Q O z 0 Q X a' w H a , C.) U- X w O w w O Q rn 0 ti CN 2 H Q C.) Cn Q J 0 z 0 r - H a' 0 0 LI) a' z 5 a' 0 U- 0 a' Q W U- O J H C, z w a' Q U) >- u: w H cc 0 H a' m Q J AXIAL STRAIN, O Co O) - N Q N a 0) oo O 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE. psf 105 Specimen Identification Classification Yd, pcf WC, % • TB -9 6 - 7 ft i Claystone/SILTSTONE; slightly sandy to sandy 109 20 NOTES: exhibited 0.4 percent expansion upon wetting under an applied pressure of 750 psf. Sample PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility erracon 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont. CO PROJECT NUMBER: 22185003 SITE: SE of E. 1-25 Frontage Road and WCR 36 Town of Mead. Colorado CLIENT: Scainell Properties Indianapolis. Indiana SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST op r N- 0 w Q J a w Q Q 0 z O :) Q CC GC w a. O J Q IL w O w tl 0 Q w 0 0 Lc, co cn O z U) z CC I- I J O U) z O U U LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT 100 r i IAL STRAIN 105 1,000 PRESSURE. psf 10,000 Specimen Identification Classification Ye, pcf WC, % • TB -9 9 - 10 ft Claystone/SILTSTONE; slightly sandy to sandy 114 _ 15 NOTES: Sample exhibited 0.2 percent expansion upon wetting under an applied pressure of 1,000 psf. PROJECT Mead FedEx Facility erracon 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont, CO PROJECT NUMBER: 22185003 SITE: SE of E. 1-25 Frontage Road and WCR 36 Town of Mead. ColoradoIndianapolis. CLIENT. Scannell Properties Indiana SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST TERRACON DATATEMPLATE.GDT 7/17/18 3 J J Q U- X LL LL a w 1l CO N U z th U co C Co J C 1, UI I- LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARA1 Er FROM OIC!NAL REPORT. 100 IAL STRAIN i 1 J 1,000 PRESSURE, psf 10,000 103 Specimen Identification Classification I %, pcf WC, % • TB -10 9 - 10 ft ClaystoneiSILTSTONE; trace Sand I 115 16 NOTES: Sample exhibited 0.1 percent expansion upon wetting under an applied pressure of 1,000 psf. PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility 1242 Bramwood PI Long Longmont. CO PROJECT NUMBER: 22185003 -erracon SITE: SE of E. 1-25 Frontage Road and WCR 36 Town of Mead, Colorado CLIENT: Scannell Properties Indianapolis. ndiana SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST co r 0 w f— < I— Q 0 L O U Q w F- a C7 J U a x W G w w 0 Q co N N Q 0 Z ui U cn Q I - U, J 0 Cr z 0 U U I- F - 0 a. W J Q z ..7 0 2 CC 0 W W cn W F- 0 cn 0 0m tic AXIAL STRAIN, 1 "j 1 1 1 1 100 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE. psf 105 Specimen Identification Classification Yd, pcf WC, % • TB -10 19 - 20 ft Claystone/SILTSTONE: slightly sandy to sandy 103 23 NOTES: Sample exhibited 1.3 percent expansion upon wetting under an applied pressure of 2,250 psf. PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility erracon 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont . CO PROJECT NUMBER: 22185003 SITE: SE of E. 1-25 Frontage Road and WCR 36 Town of Mead, Colorado CLIENT: Scannell Properties Indianapolis. Indiana SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST co r I- 0 w I- J a 2 w H Q H Q 0 z 0 '3 Q w a J U Q LL X W C LL 0 Q LL CI) O O CO N N I Q 0 z Ch cn Z U) z 0 0 H 0 a w It Q z It 0 0 W Q It Q W C J Q I- 0 W CC Q H w O ct Le 100 L STRAIN 105 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE. psf Specimen Identification I Classification I 'Yd, pcf WC, °A)] • TB -11 6 - 7 ft LEAN CLAY with SAND (CL) 110 18 NOTES: Sample exhibited 0.4 percent expansion upon wetting under an applied pressure of 500 psf. PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility erracon 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont. CO PROJECT NUMBER: 22185003 SITE: SE of E. 1-25 Frontage Road and WCR 36 Town of Mead. Colorado CLIENT: Scannell Properties Indianapolis. Indiana SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST co RZ 0 w _J C- W I— Q k — Q 0 I Z 0 Q o. 0 U U- X w 0 W LL C Q W ch O O In cc N (n Q 0 Z C) (n R Q �I J 0 C/) Z 0 U UI I- LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. AXIAL STRAIN, % C7 (b rn Imo) C'7 K1 rn no n 105 1,000 PRESSURE, psf 10,000 Specimen Identification Classification Yd, pcf WC, • TB -11 14 - 15 ft Claystone/SILTSTONE; slightly sandy to sandy 113 16 NOTES: Sample exhibited 0.7 percent expansion upon wetting under an applied pressure of 1,750 psf. PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility lierracon 1242 Bramwood PI Long Longmont, co PROJECT NUMBER: 22185003 SITE: SE of E. Town of 1-25 Frontage Road and WCR 36 Mead, Colorado CLIENT Scannell Properties Indianapolis, Indiana SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST CO H 0 w Q J w H Q H Q 0 G CC w H a. r r. U Q Il X u+ w 0 w 2 0 ac cv H cf C; ch U U) R z G I— cn J C (I) C- O, 0 H I— �r1 LL Nw 6L J Q z CT O 0 I -- Q Q (I) n Q H 0 w Q w H >- 0 re 0 Q J 10u IAL STRAIN 105 1, 000 PRESSURE, psf 10,000 Specimen Identification Classification Yd , WC, % pcf • TB -12 3 - 4 ft LEAN CLAY with SAND (CL) 117 14 NOTES: Sample exhibited 1.1 percent expansion upon wetting under an applied pressure of 500 psf. PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility erracon 1242 Bramwood R Longmont, CO Long PROJECT NUMBER: 22185003 SITE. SE of E. 1-25 Frontage Road and WCR 36 Town of Mead. Colorado CLIENT: Scannell Properties Indianapolis, Indiana SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST co CD w I- J a_ w H Q H O z 0 U Q ELI H U _J U Q w w 0 w I1 0 Q w cc CN f— (/) Q 0 z U U) R Z H J 0 0) z 0 0 H LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT 100 IAL STRAIN 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE. psf 105 Specimen Identification Classification 7d, pcf WC, % • I TB -12 9 - 10 ft SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL) 106 I 18 NOTES: Sample exhibited no movement upon wetting under an applied pressure of 500 psf. PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility erracon 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont, CO PROJECT NUMBER: 22185003 SITE: SE of E. I-25 Frontage Road and WCR 36 Town of Mead, Colorado CLIENT: Scannell Properties Indianapolis. Indiana SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST TERRACON DATATEMPLATE.GDT 7/17/18 J u; 0 w w 0 C w Cl) 0 0 C i Q 0 z th Q V' C^ v / z 0 U U H F e_ a_ w cc J C z L 0 2 cc 0 cC Q u_ 0 F- 0 >- w Q H Cr, w H 0 I cc co Q J L STRAIN r 100 1,000 PRESSURE, psf 10,000 105 L Specimen Identification Classification Ye, pcf WC, • TB -13 6 - 7 ft SANDY LEAN CLAY(CL) 106 16 NOTES: Sample exhibited 0.1 percent expansion upon wetting under an applied pressure of 500 psf. PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility erracon 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont. CO PROJECT NUMBER: 22185003 SITE: SE of E. 1-25 Frontage Road and WCR 36 Town of Mead, Colorado CLIENT: Scannell Properties Indianapolis, Indiana SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST x r r H 0 w Q J a w H Q H Q 0 z 0 J Q CC w H a. J J Q lL X W 0 LU LL 0 Q w M 0 0 H Q 0 cn U) J Z H J C z 0 U H LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT AXIAL STRAIN, % I 105 100 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE. psf Specimen Identification Classification 14, pcf WC, % • TB -14 6-7ft SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL) 113 14 NOTES: Sample exhibited 0.1 percent expansion upon wetting under an applied pressure of 500 psf. PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility erracon 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont, CO PROJECT NUMBER: 22185003 SITE: SE of E. 1-25 Frontage Road and WCR 36 Town of Mead, Colorado CLIENT Scannell Properties Indianapolis. Indiana SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST co F 0 w I J w I- Q H Q C z O U Q CL w H O -J U C X Lt O w U- C w C 0 co r N N S C- Cr Q O z 05 U Z Q CC H -J C U z O U U H H rt O Il w cc J Q z O O O C; Q Et Ili U- O C H O z w CC C/) V) H 0 I- Ct m J 1 IAL STRAIN 105 00 1,000 PRESSURE, psf 10,000 Specimen Identification Classification Yd, pcf WC, % • TB -14 14 - 15 ft Claystone/SILTSTONE; slightly sandy to sandy 117 14 NOTES: Sample exhibited 0.6 percent expansion upon wetting under an applied pressure of 1,500 psf. PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility lierracon 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont, CO PROJECT NUMBER: 22185003 SITE: SE of E. I-25 Frontage Road and WCR 36 Town of Mead, Colorado CLIENT. Scannell Properties Indianapolis. Indiana SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST co r 0 w a 2 w Q Q C z 0 Q CC CC w a J U Q U- w -: w w 0 Q w 2 O O U') op N 2 Cr; Q 0 z ch U D Q 0 0) z O U UI I- r - 0 a w cc ETD Q z 0 2 Cc 0 w Q Q a 0) 0 J Q 0 z w CC cn - >- w I- 0 0m , I I 11 s - - - 100 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE, psf 10'' Specimen Identification Classification Yd, pcf WC, % -14 19 - 20 ft Claystone/SILTSTONE; slightly sandy to sandy 118 15 ' • TB NOTES: Sample exhibited 0.6 percent expansion upon wetting under an applied pressure of 2,000 psf. PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility lierracon 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont, CO PROJECT NUMBER: 22185003 SITE SE of E. 1-25 Frontage Road and WCR 36 Town of Mead, Colorado CLIENT Indianapolis, Scannell Properties Indiana SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST co r H a w I- Q J w I- Q H Q 0 0 U w H w O J U x w a w <L 0 Q w ct) c m N N C/) Q O z Cn U C!) Q. et U) J O z O U U H H cr G a w cr J Q z n O O a w H Q a U) U- a J Q O Ci 0 0 cc °m 100 IAL STRAIN T 105 1,000 PRESSURE, psf 10,000 r Specimen Identification Classification I Yd, pcf I WC, % • TB -15 3 - 4 ft LEAN CLAY with SAND (CL) 102 12 NOTES: Sample exhibited 0.7 percent expansion upon wetting under an applied pressure of 500 psf. PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility lierracon 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont. CO PROJECT NUMBER: 22185003 SITE: SE of E. 1-25 Frontage Road and WCR 36 Town of Mead, Colorado CLIENT. Scannell Properties Indianapolis. Indiana SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST STRAIN-USCS-NO ASTM 22185003 MEAD FEDEX FACILI GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 7/17/18 0 U) z 0 U F- 0 a W cc J Q z 0 2 0 a Q Q U) U- J Q H 0 z W cc Q F - w >- 0 I- 0 Q J 100 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE. psf 105 Specimen Identification Classification Yd, pcf WC, % • TB -15 9 - 10 ft Sandy Claystone/SILTSTONE 111 17 NOTES: Sample exhibited 0.1 percent expansion upon wetting under an applied pressure of 1,000 psf. PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility lierracon 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont. Co PROJECT NUMBER: 22185003 SITE: SE of E. 1-25 Frontage Town of Mead, Colorado Road and WCR 36 CLIENT Scannell Properties Indianapolis. Indiana SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST co H 0 w F- C L w H c H c 0 z 0 (l3 a: W H L.' V J J Q tr C. ft 0 C w 2 M :V (N 2 U: 0) '3 Co I- Co J 0 Co z 0 CI CJ H 1- 0 0 I - J c C 2 ft 0 w C C 2 LU Cr LL. J c H 0 w c Co H w H 0 H m Q -J 100 • IAL STRAIN 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE. psf 105 Specimen Identification Classification Yd , pcf WC, %i 4 • 1 TB -18 2 - 3 ft LEAN CLAY with SAND (CL) 99 24 NOTES: Sample exhibited 0.8 percent expansion upon wetting under an applied pressure of 200 psf. PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility erracon 1242 Bramwood PI Long Longmont. CO PROJECT NUMBER: 22185003 SITE: SE of E. 1-25 Frontage Road and WCR 36 Town of Mead, Colorado CLIENT: Scannell Properties Indianapolis. Indiana SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST a) r r H 0 w H J a_ 2 w H Q H Q 0 z O U Ct w H C- 0 C.) Q LL X LL' O w LL 0 Q LU 2 c+' 0 0 a) m N N 2 H Ul Q 0 z J 0) R Q H J z 0 U H LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT • L STRAIN r 100 1,000 PRESSURE, psf 10,000 105 Specimen Identification Classification I Yd, pcf WC,To • I TB -20 2 - 3 ft SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL) 100 10 NOTES: Sample exhibited 2.2 percent expansion upon wetting under an applied pressure of 200 psf. PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility errecon 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont. CO PROJECT NUMBER: 22185003 SITE: SE of E. 1-25 Frontage Road and WCR 36 Town of Mead, Colorado CLIENT- Scannell Properties Indianapolis. Indiana SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST I- 0 LU I- Q J 0 2 W F- a Q 0 z 0 U w I- 2 p J :.) Q ft LU 0 Q w �� W ^r • V Q 0 z rrv) Q H [n J G z 0 OI F- 0 Q_ w CC G z_ C) 0 cL 0 Lie F- Q cL Q w U) U- 0 J Q F- 0 z W cc Q U) H w >- - 0 I - cc O Q J 100 0 IAL STRAIN $ 1.000 10,000 PRESSURE. psf 105 Specimen Identification Classification Yd, pcf WC, % • TB -22 2 - 3 ft SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL) 115 14 NOTES: Sample exhibited 1.5 percent expansion upon wetting under an applied pressure of 200 psf. a PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility lierracon 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont. CO PROJECT NLMBER: 22185003 SITE: SE of E. 1-25 Frontage Road and WCR 36 Town of Mead, Colorado CLIENT Scannell Properties Indianapolis. Indiana SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST co H 0 w F - Q J 0 2 w H Q F - Q O Z O U Q cc cc w H a U Q LL w a w IL C Q w 2 c+) 0 0 u') 00 1 N 2 H U) Q C Z C U R Q cc H U) J O z Q UI O H LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT 0 4 IAL STRAIN 105 100 1,000 PRESSURE. psf 10,000 Specimen Identification Classification ), pcf WC, % I TB -23 2 - 3 ft LEAN CLAY with SAND (CL) 106 17 NOTES: Sample exhibited 1.0 percent expansion upon wetting under an applied pressure of 200 psf. PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility errecon 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont, CO Long PROJECT NUMBER: 22185003 SITE: SE of E. 1-25 Frontage Road and WCR 36 Town of Mead. Colorado CLIENT , Scannell Properties Indianapolis. Indiana SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST H 0 C J 0 2 w H Q H Q 0 z U C it LX w H d O J u_ W a W LL G Q w M O O in cc r H (I) Q C' CJ ) J z Q it r col 0 z O 'J H LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. 100 • IAA STRAIN • t- 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE, psf 105 r Specimen Identification Classification 'Yd, pcf WC, % • 1 TB -25 2 - 3 ft SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL) 113 15 NOTES: Sample exhibited 0.5 percent expansion upon wetting under an applied pressure of 200 psf. PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility erracon 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont, Co Long PROJECT NUMBER: 22185003 SITE: SE of E. I-25 Frontage Road and WCR 36 Town of Mead, Colorado CLIENT: Scannell Properties Indianapolis. Indiana SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST 33 cp H 0 w H a J a w H Q H Q 0 I z O U Q cc cc w I— a O J U Q IL w C w 11 in Q w Ce, U O co N N H Q O z ch U U) Q co J C z O UI H LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT 100 0 IAL STRAIN 1,000 PRESSURE, psf 10,000 105 Specimen Identification I Classification I %, pcf I WC, % • TB -26 _ 2 - 3 ft _ LEAN CLAY with SAND (CL) 105 11 NOTES: Sample exhibited 3.1 percent expansion upon wetting under an applied pressure of 200 psf. PROJECT. Mead FedEx Facility erracon 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont. Co PROJECT NUMBER: 22185003 SITE: SE of E. 1-25 Frontage Road and WCR 36 Town of Mead, Colorado CLIENT Scannell Properties Indianapolis. Indiana SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST co r N- H w H J a 2 w H a H d 0 z 0 U a' a' w H a J U Q LL w O L L_ ) Q w ;r r N C4 2 H Lei Q 0 z i 6 U cn cnI Z a' J 7 0 U� H LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPOR r 100 • I- IAL STRAIN , _ A -4 1,000 PRESSURE, psf 10,000 10' Specimen Identification Classification 7d, pcf WC, To • TB -28 2 - 3 ft LEAN CLAY with SAND (CL) 110 14 NOTES: Sample exhibited 3.0 percent expansion upon wetting under an applied pressure of 200 psf. PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility erracon 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont. Co PROJECT NUMBER: 22185003 SITE: SE of E. 1-25 Frontage Road and WCR 36 Town of Mead, Colorado CLIENT Scannell Properties Indianapolis. Indiana SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST a) H 0 w H Q J a w F Q H Q 0 z 0 U eC w H a O J U LL w 0 w Il 0 Q w :e) 0 0 co cn H Q crt z th U Z H J 0 C/) 0 OI U H H 0 a. w rz J Q z (7 it 0 eC 0 w H Q Iz Q a w U) U- 0 Q H 0 z w cC CO w H r 0 H DC 0m Q J 100 IAL STRAIN 1,000 PRESSURE. psf 10,000 105 Specimen Identification Classification Td, pcf WC, % • TB -29 9 - 10 ft LEAN CLAY with SAND (CL) 103 21 NOTES: Sample exhibited no movement upon wetting under an applied pressure of 500 psf. PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility erracon 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont, CO PROJECT NUMBER: 22185003 SITE: SE of E. 1-25 Frontage Road and WCR 36 Town of Mead. Colorado CLIENT: Indianapolis. Scannell Properties Indiana SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST TERRACON DATATEMPI ATE.GDT 7'17 18 I U w a w w 0 La 0 0 tn co N C"� p- 0 z ch U Cr CC J 0 U) Z 0 O U F- LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REP( 'FIT 100 L. STRAIN 1,000 PRESSURE, psf 10,000 105 Specimen Identification Classification %, pcf WC, • TB -30 6 - 7 ft LEAN CLAY with SAND (CL) 104 22 NOTES: Sample exhibited 0.2 percent expansion upon wetting under an applied pressure of 500 psf. PROJECT Mead FedEx Facility lierracon 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont, Co PROJECT NUMBER: 22185003 SITE: SE of E. 1-25 Frontage Road and WCR 36 Town of Mead, Colorado CLIENT: Scannell Properties Ind anapolis. Indiana SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST co 0 w F- Q J d w H Q Q C z O U aY w H o. O J Q LL X w C w C Q w cr) O O cc H O Z L) U R Q C J O z O U I U H LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL RFPORT 100 •-------______.Th IAL S TRAIN , 1,000 PRESSURE, psf 10,000 105 Specimen Identification Classification Td, pcf WC, % • TB -30 9 - 10 ft Claystone/SILTSTONE; slightly sandy to sandy 117 15 NOTES: Sample exhibited 0.7 percent expansion upon wetting under an applied pressure of 1,000 psf. PROJECT Mead FedEx Facility lierracon 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont. CO -- PROJECT NUMBER: 22185003 SITE: SE of E. I-25 Frontage Road and WCR 36 Town of Mead, Colorado CLIENT: Scannell Properties Indianapolis. Indiana �_. SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST OD N- H 0 w I- C J i L. I- C I Z G C cx cx w 2 J 0 Q w X w w 0 C w L C li. co • aCV • J C r, J R cx I- U) J 0 U) 2 C U I - H cr O e_ 1. , CC J C NV LL CC U- 0 w C a_ C Il w U) C H 0 Z. ua cn I C I -- w H r CC 0 H cx m C J 100 v IAL STRAIN 1,000 PRESSURE. psf 10,000 105 r r Specimen Identification Classification % . pct WC, % • TB -31 3 - 4 ft LEAN CLAY with SAND (CL) 110 14 NOTES: Sample exhibited 0.8 percent expansion upon wetting under an applied pressure of 500 psf. PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility erracon 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont. Co Long PROJECT NUMBER: 22185003 SITE: SE of E. I-25 Frontage Road and WCR 36 Town of Mead. Colorado CLIENT: Scannell Properties Indianapolis. Indiana SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST co N- I - 0 w I- Q J a w I- Q Q D I O C cc cc L'J al J J Q Li_ X w C w LL a Q L11 Cl) 0 O cc cn N N 1 O Z R Q U) O O J I- LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT 100 IAL STRAIN , 1,000 PRESSURE. psf 10,000 10' Specimen Identification Classification Yd, pcf WC, % • TB -31 9 - 10 ft SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL) 109 18 NOTES: Sample exhibited no upon wetting under an applied pressure of 1,000 psf. movement PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility erracon 1242 Bramwood PI Long Longmont. CO PROJECT NUMBER- 22185003 SITE: SE of E. I-25 Frontage Road and WCR 36 Town of Mead, Colorado CLIENT. Scannell Properties Indianapolis. Indiana SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST AZ H C w H C w H Q H Q L z 0 U Q a. _J U U - X y C W 0 G w r� 0 0 x N r- ) O z C), R _z Q H Ui Tr CONSOI LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT 100 1 - IAL STRATI • - -- T 1,000 PRESSURE, psf 10,000 105 Specimen Identification Classification Yd , pcf WC, To • TB -32 9 - 10 ft Claystone/SILTSTONE; slightly sandy to sandy 114 17 NOTES: Sample exhibited 0.3 percent expansion upon wetting under an applied pressure of 500 psf. PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility lierracon 1242 Bramwood PI Long Longmont CO PROJECT NUMBER: 22185003 SITE: SE of E. 1-25 Frontage Road and WCR 36 Town of Mead. Colorado CLIENT: Scannell Properties Indianapolis, Indiana SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST cc r 0 w H Q a 2 H Q H Q 0 z 0 Q CC DC w H 0 J :.) Q LL X G w w a Q w CD 0 u) co N N U a O C.) cn -; Q H co 0 (I; L 0 J LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT 100 • IAL STRAIN I I 105 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE. osf Specimen Identification Classification yd, pcf WC, % • TB -32 19 - 20 ft Claystone/SILTSTONE; slightly sandy to sandy 113 15 NOTES: Sample exhibited 0.1 percent expansion upon wetting under an applied pressure of 1,000 psf. erracon 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont , co PROJECT NUMBER: 22185003 PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility SITE: SE of E. 1-25 Frontage Road and WCR 36 Town of Mead, Colorado CLIENT: Scannell Properties Indianapolis. Indiana w SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST op r r H 0 w H Q J a_ 2 w C H Q O Z 0 U CC w H d 0 U LL X w 0 w 0 et W 2 Cr) O O cc N N 2 U) Q 0 L) U U) 7 Z I- J 0 U) z 0 0. H CC 0 a w It z 0 2 LL 0 LLi Cfs Q w LL 0 J Q H 0 CL >- w Q ✓) H H 0 H- CC 30 J 100 IAL STRAIN 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE. psf 105 Specimen Identification Classification %,pcf WC, % • TB -33 3 - 4 ft SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL) 115 12 NOTES: Sample exhibited 0.9 percent expansion upon wetting under an applied pressure of 500 psf. PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility erracon 1242 Bramwood PI Long Longmont. CO PROJECT NUMBER: 22185003 SITE: SE of E. 1-25 Frontage Road and WCR 36 Town of Mead, Colorado CLIENT. Scannell Properties Indianapolis. Indiana r SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST OD I- 0 w I- C J O. w C C O z C C Cr EL -5_ U C w x C. Li_ 0 C w G co N cn C O Z ch Cn J C CC vJ 1 J C Z O U� I- LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT 100 I IAL STRAIN 1,000 PRESSURE, psf 10,000 105 Specimen Identification Classification 74, pcf WC, % • TB -33 9 - 10 ft SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL) 110 17 NOTES: Sample exhibited no movement upon wetting under an applied pressure of 500 psf. PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility lierracon 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont. CO PROJECT NUMBER: 22185003 SITE: SE of E. 1-25 Town of Mead, Frontage Road and WCR 36 Colorado CLIENT. Scannell Properties Indianapolis. Indiana SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST H 0 w Q J a. 2 Ui H Q H Q 0 ZI 0 Q CM It u' H a 0 22185003 MEAD FEDEX >CIl I CM O a. w CM 5 iY 0 2 LL O W H Q CM Q a w LL J Q H 0 Z W It Q H u H 0 F- CM co 100 L STRAIN 1,000 PRESSURE, psf 10,000 10J Specimen Identification Classification 'Yd, pcf WC, % • TB -34 6 - 7 ft SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL) 108 18 J NOTES: Sample exhibited no movement upon wetting under an applied pressure of 500 psf. PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility erracon 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont. CO PROJECT NUMBER: 22185003 SITE: SE of E L25 Frontage Road and WCR 36 Town of Mead, Colorado CLIENT Scannell Properties Indianapolis, Indiana SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST co r H 0 w H Q J a. 2 W H Q H Q 0. 0 U Q CC CC w H a- 0 J U Q LL w a w u_ a Q w 2 0 0 co c.; v 2 cn 0 z :n U R Q CC H J 0 0 U� U H LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT IAL STRAIN 100 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE, psf 105 Specimen Identification Classification Yd, pcf WC, % • 1 TB -35 6 - 7 ft LEAN CLAY with SAND (CL) 107 20 NOTES: Sample exhibited no movement upon wetting under an applied pressure of 500 psf. PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility erracon 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont. CO PROJECT NUMBER: 22185003 SITE: SE of E. 1-25 Frontage Road and WCR 36 Town of Mead, Colorado CLIENT: Scannell Properties Indianapolis. Indiana SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST r H 0 w I- Q J a 2 w H Q H Q z 0 U Q cr cc w H n_ C7 J_ U U- G w U- G Q w , co ^r1 Y J; Ch 0 z U (1 Q H U, J C z 0 U I U H INAL REPORT LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORI 100 1 IAL STRAIN S 105 1.000 10,000 PRESSURE. psf Specimen Identification Classification 7d. pef WC, • TB -35 14 - 15 ft SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL) 114 16 NOTES: Sample exhibited 0.1 percent expansion upon wetting under an applied pressure of 500 psf. PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility errecon 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont. CO PROJECT NUMBER: 22185003 SITE: SE of E. 1-25 Frontage Road and WCR 36 Town of Mead. Colorado CLIENT: Scannell Properties Indianapolis, Indiana SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST co 1- 0 LL) F- Q w 0 H Q 0 I z d w H a J J LL LL G Li LL a Q LU cv) O O to co N 2 cn Q 0 Z U R Q H- I J 0 V) z 0 C2 JI LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. 100 r IAL STRAIN ^_ 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE. psf 105 I Specimen Identification Classification %, pcf WC, % • TB -36 3 - 4 ft SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL) 111 16 NOTES: Sample exhibited 0.6 percent expansion upon wetting under an applied pressure of 500 psf. PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility lierracon 1242 Bramwood PI Long Longmont. CO , PROJECT NUMBER: 22185003 SITE: SE of E. 1-25 Frontage Road and WCR 36 Town of Mead. Colorado CLIENT: Scannell Properties Indianapolis. Indiana SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST CO N- H 0 w H Q J a_ w Q H Q CI O w H- D C9 U Q w w 0 w Li 0 Q w co O O oo N N cn Z cn -i LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT 100 IAL STRAIN 105 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE, psf Specimen Identification Classification I Ya, pcf WC, • TB -36 9 - 10 ft SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL) 110 ' 18 NOTES: Sample exhibited 0.1 percent expansion upon wetting under an applied pressure of 500 psf. PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility erracon 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont. CO Long PROJECT NUMBER: 22185003 SITE: SE of E. 1-25 Frontage Road and WCR 36 Town of Mead, Colorado CLIENT: Scannell Properties Indianapolis, Indiana SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST co r H a stC H J 0 W H Q H Q 0 I z O Q cc w H a C7 J J u_ X w a LL a Q W O O CD N N cn O z th U Co R Q CC r Co J O Co z O U J H F- 0 a w J Q z E2 O O cC a Q Q cn 0 Q H O z w H w F- › - CC O F - cc m Q J AXIAL STRAIN, -s 1 1 1 1 O co O 4. N Q Ni a O co O • ill 1,000 PRESSURE. psf 10,000 105 Specimen Identification Classification id, pcf WC, % • TB -37 2 - 3 ft LEAN CLAY with SAND (CL) 113 15 NOTES: Sample exhibited 3.0 percent expansion upon wetting under an applied pressure of 200 psf. PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility erracon 1242 Bramwood Longmont, Long PI CO PROJECT NUMBER: 22185003 SITE: SE of E. 1-25 Frontage Road Town of Mead. Colorado and WCR 36 CLIENT. Scannell Properties Indianapolis, Indiana SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST r Rz H 0 w I- Q a w Q H Q 0 z I U CL CL w d (? J U Q LL x w 0 w LL U Q w 0 0 co 1 N N Cr Ch 0 z cn z Q H ( z 0 UI U H H - re 0 a w LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM OR -- IAL STRAIN 105 100 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE, psf Specimen Identification Classification yd, pcf WC, % • TB -38 2 - 3 ft LEAN CLAY with SAND (CL) i 107 14 NOTES: Sample exhibited 1.7 percent expansion upon wetting under an applied pressure of 200 psf. PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility lierracon- 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont. CO Long PROJECT NUMBER: 22185003 SITE: SE of E. 1-25 Frontage Road and WCR 36 Town of Mead. Colorado CLIENT: Scannell Properties Indianapolis. ndiana SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST JSCS-NO ASTM 2218500/ MEAD FEnEX FACILI UPJ TERRACON DATATEMPLATE.GDT 7/17/18 z cn J C z 0 U� F- LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT 100 • IAL STRAIN I- 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE. psf 105 Specimen Identification Classification Td, pcf WC, • TB -40 2 - 3 ft LEAN CLAY with SAND (CL) 108 19 NOTES: Sample exhibited 1.2 percent expansion upon wetting under an applied pressure of 200 psf. erracon 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont. CO PROJECT NUMBER: 22185003 PROJECT: Mead FedEx Facility SITE SE of E. 1-25 Frontage Road and WCR 36 Town of Mead, Colorado CLIENT. Scannell Indianapolis. Properties Indiana ATTERBERG LIMITS RESULTS ASTM 04318 00 r H w H C J a w I - H C 0 C I C: C w H a J U C LL w G U. I LL 0 Q w 2 co N N I- 2 0 cc w m ll; H H C cx C a w cc J C CD C 2 C C w Q Q a >- LL 0 J C J H 0 W H w H C H C co J 50 P L A S 40 T C I 30 T Y N 20 D E x 10 60 O & G O" of o CI O A MH or OH --- ML or OL CL-ML , i 20 40 60 80 LIQUID LIMIT 100 Boring ID Depth I LL PL pl Fines USGS Description • TB -1 9 - 10 32 16 16 58 CL SANDY LEAN CLAY 1 B-7 6 - 7 35 16 19 54 CL SANDY LEAN CLAY ►i A TB -8 9 - 10 39 23 16 84 CL Claystone/SILTSTONE with SAND * TB -11 9 - 1 0) NP NP NP 72 ML Sandstone/SIL -STONE O TB -13 6 - 7 31 16 15 56 CL SANDY LEAN CLAY • TB -IS 9 - 10 34 20 14 64 CL Sandy CIr,ystone/SI LTSTONE PROJECT Mead FedEx Facility erracon 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont. CO PROJECT NUMBER: 22185003 SITE: SE of E. 1-25 Frontage Road and WCR 36 Town of Mead. Colorado CLIENT Scannell Indianapolis. Properties Indiana ATTERBERG LIMITS RESULTS ASTM D4318 co H 0 0 w H Q J a w H Q H Q 0, z 0 cc w H a O U LL X U; 0 u_ 0 w 2 a 0 cc N N O $-- 0 w w H Q H a w J Q 3 0 2 0 LL. 0 w H Q CC Q a w LL J Q H 0 z w Q H w H 0 z a 5 60 50 P L A sge O S 40' T C I -- 0 G T 30 Y n I N 8 O fp 20 D E ►i G� MH or OH X 10 a — CL -ML OL 0 �, i ML or - - G 20 40 LIQUID LIMIT 60 80 100 Boring ID Depth LL PL P1 Fines 20 22 81 A-7-6 (18) LEAN CLAY with SAND • TB -17 1 - 4 42 17 16 62 A-6(7) SANDY LEAN CLAY " TB -19 3-4 33 18 17 70 A-6 (10) SANDY LEAN CLAY A TB -20 1 - 4 35 17 20 70 A-6 (12) SANDY LEAN CLAY * TB -21 1 - 4 37 0 TB -23 1 - 4 38 17 21 73 A-6 (14) LEAN CLAY with SAND • TB -25 1 - 4 35 17 18 53 A-6 (6) SANDY LEAN CLAY 20 22 72 A-7-6 (15) LEAN CLAY with SAND O TB -26 1 - 4 42 18 23 75 A-7-6 (16) LEAN CLAY with SAND A TB -28 1 - 4 41 17 21 83 A-6 (17) LEAN CLAY with SAND ® TB -37 1 - 4 38 e TB -39 1 - 4 36 16 20 77 A-6 (14) LEAN CLAY with SAND 15 26 76 A-7-6 (18) LEAN CLAY with SAND TB -40 1 - 4 41 14 22 70 A-6 (13) LEAN CLAY with SAND O TB -41 1 - 4 36 PROJECT Mead FedEx Facility erracon 1242 Bramwood PI Longmont. CO PROJECT NUMBER 22185003 CLIENT Scannell Properties Indianapolis. Indiana SITE: SE of E. 1-25 Frontage Road and WCR 36 Town of Mead, Colorado 1 liriaCOrI 1901 Sharp Point Dr Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 (970) 484-0359 FAX (970) 484-0454 RESISTANCE R -VALUE & EXPANSION PRESSURE OF COMPACTED SOIL AASHTO T190 CLIENT: PROJECT: LOCATION: TERRACON NO. Scannell Mead TB 22185003 -26 FedEx at Properties 1 to Facility 4 feet CLASSIFICATION: LEAN CLAY DATE OF with TEST: SAND (CL); 30 -Mar A-7-6(15) -18 SAMPLE DATA TEST RESULTS TEST COMPACTION DENSITY MOISTURE EXPANSION HORIZONTAL SAMPLE EXUDATION CORRECTED UNCORRECTED SPECIMEN (PCF) HEIGHT CONTENT PRESSURE PRESSURE PRESSURE R PRESSURE -VALUE R NO. (INCHES) -VALUE (%) (PSI) (PSI) (PSI) @ 160 PSI -0.03 124.4 97.5 25.3 145 2.62 1 30 5.0 4.7 100.3 -0.03 220.4 23.8 136 2.65 2 50 8.8 8.3 107.7 337.9 19.6 0.00 136 2.51 13.4 13.4 3 90 R -VALUE @ 300 PSI EXUDATION PRESSURE = 12 100 90 80 - 70 - - 60 W a te 50 40 30 20 i - 10 0 0 100 200 EXUDATION 300 400 PRESSURE 500 - PSI 600 CO 800 SUPPORTING INFORMATION GENERAL NOTES Proposed FedEx Facility ■ Town of Mead, Weld County, Colorado July 26. 2018 • Terracon Project No. 22185003 GENERAL NOTES DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS lierracon GeoReport JNIldWVS WATER LEVEL FIELD TESTS (HP) Hand Penetrometer (T) Torvane (b/f) Standard Penetration Test (blows per foot) (PID) Photo -Ionization Detector (OVA) Organic Vapor Analyzer V Water Initially Tr Encountered Water Level After a Auger Split Spoon Specified Period of Titres Water Level After Water levels logs are the borehole at Groundwater levels the a Specified Period indicated on the measured times indicated. level variations of soil in will Time the boring occur Shelby Tube Macro Core N Ring Sampler Rock Core over accurate time In determination low permeability of sods. groundwater , 7 V_— levels water is not level possible with observations. short term Grab Sample No Recovery aacRIPTIVE SOIL CLASSIFICATION Soil classification is based on the Unified Soil Classification System. Coarse Craned Soils have more than 50% of their dry weight retained on a #200 sieve: their principal descriptors are. boulders. cobbles, gravel or sand. Fine Craned Soils have less than 50°x° of their dry weight retained on a #200 sieve: they are principally described as clays if they are plastic. and silts if they are slightly plastic or non -plastic. Major constituents may be added as modifiers and minor constituents may be added according to the relative proportions based on grain size. In addition to gradation. coarse -grained soils are defined on the basis of their in -place relative density and fine-grained soils on the basis of their consistency. LOCATION AND ELEVATION NOTES Unless otherwise noted. Latitude and Longitude are approximately determined using a hand-held GPS device. The accuracy of such devices is variable. Surface elevation data annotated with +/- indicates that no actual topographical survey was conducted to confirm the surface elevation. Instead. the surface elevation was approximately determined from topographic maps of the area STRENGTH TERMS RELATNE DENSITY OF COARSE -GRAINED SOILS More Mar 50% retained on No 200 sieve ) Density determined by Standard Penetration Resistance Indudes gravel;, sands and silts CONSISTENCY OF FINE-GRAINED SOILS (50°j% or more passing the No 200 sieve ) Consistency determined by laboratory shear strength testing. field visual -manual procedures or standard Penetration resistance BEDROCK Descnntive Standard Penetration Ring Descriptive Unconfined Standard Ring Ring Standard penetration Descriptive or N Sampler Sampler Term Compressive Penetration or N Sampler Sampler or Term (Density) -Value Blows/Ft. Blows/Ft. (Consistency) Strength. -Value Blows/Ft. Blows/Ft. BlowslFt NI -Value (Consistency) Qu, psf Blows/Ft. Very Loose 0 - 3 0 - 5 Very Soft less than 500 0 - 1 j < 24 < 20 Weathered Loose 4 - 9 6 - 14 Soft 500 to 1,000 2 4 3 - 5 24 35 20 - 29 Firm Medium Dense 10 - 29 15 - 46 Medium -Stiff 1 000 to 2.000 4 8 6 10 36 - 60 30 49 Medium Hard - --- - .- Dense 30 - 50 47 - 79 Stiff 2,000 to 4.000 8 - 15 11 - 18 61 - 96 50 - 79 Hard Very Dense > 50 ' 8o Very Stiff 4.000 to 8.000 15 - 30 19 - 36 > 96 >79 very Hard Hard > 8 000 > 30 > 36 RELATIVE PROPORTIONS OF SAND AND GRAVEL Descriptive Term(si of other constituents Trace With Modifier Percent of Dry Weight < 15 15-29 > 30 RELATIVE PROPORTIONS OF FINES Descriptive Term(s) of other constituents Trace With Modifier Percent of Dry Weight < 5 5- 12 > 12 Major Component of Sample Boulders Cobbles Gravel Sand Silt or Clay I IM1 Non -plastic Low Medium High lierracon GRAIN SIZETERMINOLOGY Particle Size Over 12 in. (300 mm) 12 in to 3 in. (300mm to 75mm) 3 in. to #4 sieve (75mm to 4.75 mm) #4 to #200 sieve (4 75mm to 0 075mm Passing #200 sieve (0.075mm) PLASTICITY DESCRIPTION Plasticity Index 0 1-10 11 -30 > 30 UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM lierracon Proposed FedEx Facility July26. 2018 ■ Terracon ■ Town of Mead, Weld Project No. 22185003 1 County, Colorado GRrt Soil Classification Criteria for Assigning Group Symbols and Group Names Using Laboratory Tests A i Group Symbol Group Name B Gravels: Clean Gravels: Cu ? 4 and 1 - Cc 3 E GW Well -graded gravel F More than 50% of Less than 5% fines c Cu < 4 and/or 1 > Cc > 3 E GP Poorly graded gravel F coarse fraction Gravels with Fines: Fines classify as ML or MH GM Silty gravel F,G,H Coarse -Grained Soils: retained on No. 4 o More than 12% fines C Fines classify as CL or CH GC Clayey gravel F,G,H More than 50% retained on No. 200 sieve Sands: Clean Sands: Cu ≥ 6 and 1 < Cc ≤ 3 E SW Well -graded sand 50% or more of coarse Less than 5% fines D Cu < 6 and/or 1 > Cc > 3 E SP Poorly graded sand fraction passes No. 4 Sands with Fines: Fines classify as ML or MH SM Silty sand G,H,i sieve More than 12% fines D Fines classify as CL or CH SC Clayey sand G,H,i Inorganic: PI > 7 and plots on or above "A" CL Lean clay K,L,M Silts and Clays: PI < 4 or plots below "A" line J ML Silt K,L,M Liquid limit less than 50 Liquid limit - oven dried 75 OL Organic M clay K,L,,N Fine -Grained Soils: Organic: Liquid limit - not dried q 0 Organic silt K,L,M,o 50%io or more passes the No. 200 sieve Inorganic: PI plots on or above "A" line CH Fat clay K,L, M Silts and Clays: PI plots below "A" line MH Elastic Silt K,L,M Liquid limit 50 or more Liquid limit - oven dried 0.75 OH Organic clay K,L,M,P Organic: Liquid limit - not dried - Organic silt K,L,M,Q Highly organic soils: Primarily organic matter, dark in color, and organic odor PT Peat A Based B If field or boulders. C Gravels gravel graded D Sands sand sand on sample with with gravel with with with the silt. 5 silt, silt, material contained or both" 5 to GW-GC with to 12% SW SP passing to group 12% fines well silt. GP fines -SC well -SC poorly ( cobbles D require -graded -GC require -graded graded 3n1 ) the name. poorly L 3 -inch (75 -mm) or boulders, or dual symbols: gravel with graded gravel dual symbols: sand with clay, sand with clay sieve both. add "with cobbles GW-GM well -graded clay. GP -GM poorly with clay. SW-SM well -graded SP-SM poorly graded H If I If J If K If gravel," L If "sandy" MY "gravelly" N PI fines soil Atterberg soil soil soil ≥ 4 are contains contains whichever contains to contains and organic. limits group to plots add "with organic > 15% gravel, add plot in shaded 15 to 29% plus No. is predominant. 30% plus No. 200 name. :' 30% plus No. 200. group name. on or above 'A" line. fines" to group name. "with gravel" to group area, soil is a CL -ML, silty 200. add "with sand" predominantly sand, predominantly gravel, name. clay. or "with add add ECu=D60/D,o Cc= F If soil contains -- 15%sand. G If fines classify as CL -ML, D x add use D _ n o "with dual sand" to group name. symbol GC -GM, or SC-SM. o PI < P PI plots Q PI plots 4 or plots below "A" line. on or above "A" line. below "A" line. 60 For soils of coarse classification and -grained fine-grained of soils fine-grained fraction -t034---/ .' / . ' , 50 -1 Equation of "A" - line :J ,' E. Horizontal P1=4 to LL=25.5. at ,./ then P1=0.73 -20) X 40 Lu (LL 00+ PLASTICITY INDI N C� > O O Equation of U - line of Vertical at LL=16 to P1=7, G� ,. - then P1=0.9 (LL -8) ;A O ,/ pc de MH or OH / , r CL - ML ML or OL 0 10 16 20 30 4U LIQUID 50 LIMIT 60 (LL) 70 80 90 100 110 DESCRIPTION OF ROCK PROPERTIES Proposed Fed Ex Facility • Town of Mead, Weld County, Colorado July 26, 2018 ■ Terracon Project No. 22185003 DESCRIPTION OF ROCK PROPERTIES (Based on ASTM C-294) Sedimentary Rocks lierracon GeoReport Sedimentary rocks are stratified materials laid down by water or wind. The sediments may be composed of particles or pre-existing rocks derived by mechanical weathering, evaporation or by chemical or organic origin. The sediments are usually indurated by cementation or compaction. Chert Very fine-grained siliceous rock composed of micro -crystalline or cyrptocrystalline quartz.. chalcedony or opal. Chert is various colored, porous to dense, hard and has a conchoidal to splintery fracture. Claystone Fine-grained rock composed of or derived by erosion of silts and clays or any rock containing clay. Soft massive and may contain carbonate minerals. Conglomerate Dolomite Limestone Sandstone Shale Siltstone Rock consisting of a considerable amount of rounded gravel, sand and cobbles with or without interstitial or cementing material. The cementing or interstitial material may be quartz, opal, calcite, dolomite, clay, iron oxides or other materials. A fine-grained carbonate rock consisting of the mineral dolomite [CaMg(CO3)2]. May contain noncarbonate impurities such as quartz, chert, clay minerals, organic matter, gypsum and sulfides. Reacts with hydrochloric acid (HCL). A fine-grained carbonate rock consisting of the mineral calcite (CaCO3). May contain noncarbonate impurities such as quartz. chert, clay minerals, organic matter, gypsum and sulfides. Reacts with hydrochloric acid (HCL). Rock consisting of particles of sand with or without interstitial and cementing materials. The cementing or interstitial material may be quartz, opal, calcite, dolomite, clay, iron cxides or other material. Fine-grained rock composed of or derived by erosion of silts and clays or any rock containing clay. Shale is hard, platy, or fissile and may be gray, black, reddish or green and may contain some carbonate minerals (calcareous shale). Fine grained rock composed of or derived by erosion of silts or rock containing silt. Siltstones consist predominantly of silt sized particles (0.0625 to 0.002 mm in diameter) and are intermediate rocks between claystones and sandstones and may contain carbonate minerals. Directors: Bill Szmyd, President Steve Brandenburg Larry Brandt Paul Bukowski Kathy Gallivan-Crist Ed Martens Little Thompson Water District July 24, 2018 District Manager: Michael T. Cook 835 E Highway 56 Berthoud, CO 80513 P: 970-532-2096 F: 970-532-3734 www.LTWD.org Dan Skeehan 4582 S. Ulster St., Suite 1500 Denver, CO 80237 Dan.skeehan@kimley-horn.com Dear Mr. Skeehan: This letter is in response to your request for water service commitment for one 2 -inch domestic non- residential tap and one 1.5 -inch irrigation (non-residential) tap for the property located south of the railroad tracks, east of Interstate 25 (I-25) frontage road and north of Weld County Road 34 (WCR 34), or more generally described as follows: PORTION OF SW 1/4 of SEC 11, T3N, R68W -- WELD COUNTY, CO Parcels 120711000092 and 12071 1000093 The District provides water service within its service area as defined by the District. The provision of water service by extension of existing water lines of the District to the above property and the installation of taps for lots is done under the terms of the Rules and Regulations of the District established by the Board of the District from time to time. You may obtain a copy of the Rules and Regulations from the District. This letter outlines the provisions of the Rules and Regulations, however this letter does not change any provisions of the Rules and Regulations. The Board of the District may alter and amend the Rules and Regulations at any time, and the provisions of this letter are subject to alteration and amendment based on changes in the Rules and Regulations of the District. The District jointly owns and operates a 24 -inch line along the east side of the I-25 Frontage Road. This line is not available for service as it is a transmission line. We do not have distribution lines adjacent to the proposed properties; however, we can commit to provide service to the above property for the requested 2 -inch and 1.5 -inch non-residential taps, subject to the limitations in this letter and the following additional limitations on the provision of water service: 1) All improvements to District facilities required to provide service will be the financial responsibility of the developer in accordance with the District Rules and Regulations. All improvements must conform to District Specifications. 2) A 12 -inch water line extension from the District's existing master meter vault at the southeast corner of the 1-25 Frontage Road and WCR 34 to the project site. If the facility requires redundant fire protection in case of a waterline break a separate fire hydrant connection to the jointly owned 24 -inch waterline may be allowed. This line may NOT be used for typical domestic or irrigation service. 3) Little Thompson Water District typically does not accept cash in lieu payments for water rights for developments. The developer will be required to provide water rights to meet the minimum projected needs of the proposed development at 3.5 acre-feet for the 1.5 - inch tap and 5.6 acre-feet for the 2 -inch tap resulting in a net raw water dedication requirement of 9.1 acre-feet. Please contact Nancy Koch to discuss options for water dedication for the property. 4) Prior to initiating water service, you will need to provide evidence that the property is included in the Municipal Sub District of the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District. You can find information on having your property included in the Municipal Sub District at the offices of the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy. Current Weld County tax records indicate that the property is included in Little Thompson Water District. 5) Where fire hydrants are required for the site, there is a $2,000 per fire hydrant fee that needs to be paid prior to installation of the fire hydrant (installed by your contractor). This commitment letter will expire two years from the date of this letter if the taps have not been purchased, paid for and installed by that date of expiration. The current fee for the 1.5 -inch tap is $56,825 with installation provided by the Developer. The current fee for the 2 -inch tap is $90,920 with installation provided by the Developer. This does NOT include the required raw water dedication for the taps. YOU ARE HEREBY ADVISED THAT THE RULES, REGULATIONS AND TARIFFS OF THE DISTRICT ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE; AND THIS LETTER IS ISSUED WITH THE SPECIFIC LIMITATION THAT THE DISTRICT MAY CHANGE THE RULES, REGULATIONS AND TARIFFS APPLICABLE TO THE ABOVE PROPERTY AT ANY TIME WITHOUT NOTICE TO YOU OR ANY PERSON. If you have questions, please contact me. Regards, t? iva Amber''Kauffman, PE District Engineer Planning & Zoning Department Community Development Agency Referral Request Today's Date: Referral Comments Due: Project Name: Project Number: Project Type: Project Address: Planning Contact: Email: Phone: September 26, 2018 October 25, 2018 Mead Warehouse 2018-12 Preliminary Plat Generally, northwest of I-25/CR 34 intersection Jeremiah Fettig ifettig@townofinead.org (970) 805-4202 Dear Referral Organization or Agency: Information on the proposal in the Town of Mead referenced above is enclosed for your review and comments. Please reply by the date listed above, any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response by the Planning Department. ❑ We have no objections to this proposal ❑ Please note the following concerns this organization has with this proposal: attached letter for comments regarding this proposal. Organization or Agency Name: Your Name: Date: Email: Please send your response to ifettig@townofinead.org If you have any further questions regarding the application, please contact the Planner associated with the request as referenced above. D See Town of Mead 1441 Third Street I Mead, Colorado 80542 I (970) 535-4477 I www.townofmead.org Planning & Zoning Department Community Development Agency Referral Request Today's Date: Referral Comments Due: Project Name: Project Number: Project Type: Project Address: Planning Contact: Email: Phone: September 26, 2018 October 25, 2018 Mead Warehouse 2018-12 Preliminary Plat Generally, northwest of I-25/CR 34 intersection Jeremiah Fettig ifettig@townofmead.org (970) 805-4202 Dear Referral Organization or Agency: Information on the proposal in the Town of Mead referenced above is enclosed for your review and comments. Please reply by the date listed above, any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response by the Planning Department. ❑ We have no objections to this proposal ❑ Please note the following concerns this organization has with this proposal: See attached letter for comments regarding this proposal. Organization or Agency Name: Your Name: Date: Email: Please send your response to jfettig@townofmead.org If you have any further questions regarding the application, please contact the Planner associated with the request as referenced above. Town of Mead i 441 Third Street I Mead, Colorado 80542 I (970) 535-4477 I www.townofmead.org Chloe Rempel From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Pam Gehringer <PGehringer@townofmead.org> Thursday, September 27, 2018 12:07 PM Pam Gehringer Christopher Kennedy; Jeremiah Fettig Mead Warehouse Site Plan -This email. originated from outside of Weld County Government. Do not click links or op sender and know the content is safe. REVIEW REFERRAL: PROJECT FILE# 2018-13 FROM: TOWN OF MEAD PLANNING DEPARTMENT n' attachments. unless you recognize Information on the proposal referenced below is available for your review and comment. Please see the instructions in this email for accessing information on this proposal. Project Name Mead Warehouse Pro ecte Site Plan Project Location Generally northwest of I-25/CR 34 intersection Zoning Mixed Use Comments Due By October 2.5, 2 018 Planning Contact Jeremiah Fettig Email jfettig@townofinead.orq Phone 970-805-4202 1 For external entities such as utility companies, special districts, property owner's associations or state agencies, please use the following instructions. Documents are available for your review on the Town of Mead Dropbox folder. Please use the following information to access the site: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/s228hu7au24io91/AAB8V0x4TnccidINdCizF6vla?dl=0 To provide comments, please complete referral form located in the dropbox and email to Jeremiah Fettig jfettig@townofinead.org Pam Gehringer Town of Mead Utility Billing Building Permits 2 Town of Mead 441 Third Street P.O. Box 626 970-535-4477 Mead, CO 80542 .tovN notmead.orc LAND USE APPLICATION PAGE TWO MUST BE SIGNED AND NOTARIZED Project/Business Name Project Address Industrial Development Northeast corner of 1-25 Frontage Road and County Road 34. Project Description 50.08 acre warehouse/distribution development consisting of one -146,985 SF building, three accessory buildings, and associated site improvements. Project to be developed in two phases. Separate Annexation, Initial Zoning, and Preliminary Plat applications submitted. Legal Description (Provide Subdivision, l.ot `, Block / or Attach Metes and Bounds) Mead Mixed -Use Subdivision, Lot 1, Block 1 Owner Name/Company (Attach Separate Sheets if Multiple) Contact Person (If Different) Augustine Gomez WCR 34 & Hwy 25-220 LLC; do McRae Group of Companies Address/City/State/Zip 8800 N. Gainey Center Drive, Suite 255, Scottsdale, AZ 85285 Phone (480) 609-1200 Email Auggie@ronMcRae.com Fax (480) 609-1200 Authorized Representative Name/Company Scannell Properties, LLC. Attn: Chris Miller Address/City/State/Zip 8801 River Crossing Blvd, Suite 300, Indianapolis, IN 46240 Phone (317) 843-5959 Email ChrisM@ScannellProperties.com Fax Land Use Application Form 08/09 Page 1 of 2 Mineral Rights Owner/Lease Holder Name/Company (Attach Separate Sheets if Multiple) Grizzly Petroleum Company, LLC Address/City/State/Zip 1801 Broadway, Suite 500, Denver CO 80202 Service Providers Gas Xcel Water Little Thompson Water District Metro District Electric United Power Sewer Town of Mead Fire Mountain View Fire District Land Use Information Current Zoning A - Agricultural (Weld County) Proposed Zoning Light Industrial (LI) Acres 50.08 Density (DU/Acre) N/A # Lots/Units Proposed 1 The undersigned is fully aware of the request/proposal being made and the actions being initiated on the referenced property. The undersigned understand that the application must be found to be complete by the Town of Mead before the request can officially be accepted and the development review process initiated. The undersigned is aware that the applicant is fitly responsible for all reasonable costs associated with the review of the application'request being made to the Town of Mead. Applicants shall pay all costs billed by the Town for legal, engineering and planning costs incurred by staff, including consultants acting on behalf of staff. necessary for project review. By this acknowledgement. the undersigned hereby certify that the above information is true and correct. WCR 34 & HWY 25-220. LLC. a Colorado limited liability company By. WOG Real Estate Se -ces XV. L.L.C.: an .zona limited liability company.. its Administrator Owner: By. . its Authorized Officer Owner: Applicant: STATE OF C ) ) SS. County of u(e.z2p‘{. ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this Afrn•G 97 �,4.7 GZ by My commission expires: A ) c?D.RI, Witness my hand and official s`>sal. .--•••- �rs. OFFICIAL SEAL BENJAMIN JAMES McRAE Notary Public • State of Arizona � ./' MARICOPA COUNTY P. Date: ��/L//, Q day of Land Use Application Form 08/09 Ls....kaaon• ta ...am ••••••ow. • a ..olk•mmmak•i••.=••.•••••••...." Noory Public Date: Date: 9/74( 201% Page 2 of 2 Town of Mead 441 Third Street PO Box 626 Mead, CO 80542 SITE PLAN PRE -APP FORM Date of Pre -application meeting: July 19, 2018 Project Name: Industrial Development Project Location: Generally northwest of 1-25/CR 34 intersection Project Description: Annexation of approximately 160 acres, with the purpose of locating a trucking terminal facility. Contact Person: Dan Skeehan, Chris Miller Contact Info: dan.skeehan@kimle -horn. corn; chrism@scannellproperties.com Fee: $750 Deposit: $10,000 Total Due: $10,750 For more information, please refer to the Mead Land Use Code, here: https://library.municode.com/co/mead/codes/municipal code?nodeld=CD_CH16LAUSCO X Submittal Checklist 1. Six (6) paper and five (5) electronic (flash or CD) copies of application package. X 2. Legal descriptions — provided in Word document 3. Land Use Application Form. https://www.townofinead.org/sites/default/files/fileattachments/planning amp zonin g/page/.51096/land_use application.pdf X 4. Technical criteria form (This document). X 5. Fee Agreement. https://www.townofinead.org/sites/default/files/fileattachments/planning amp zonin g/page/51096/agreement for payment of review expenses.pdf X 6. Fee and deposit. https://www.townofinead.org/sites/default/tiles/fileattachments/ordinance/51085/reso 58-r-2017 fees and deposits under land use_code.pdf X 7. Title Commitment. The title commitment must be current and dated no more than thirty (30) days from the date of preliminary plat application submittal. 8. Surrounding and Interested Property Ownership Report. Provide current list (< 30 days old) of the names and addresses of the surrounding property owners (within 300 feet of property), mineral estate owners and ditch companies. X 9. Affidavit certifying the names and addresses of all known mineral and subsurface right owners. Town of Mead 441 Third Street PO Box 626 Mead, CO 80542 X 10. Site Plan Map(s) — (24" X 36" sheets folded to 9" X 12") containing utilities and other information outlined in Section 16-4-100 of the Land Use Code accessible here: https://library.municode.com/co/mead/codes/municipal_code?nodeld=CD CH 1 6L USCOARTIVSURE S16-4-100SIPL. X 11. Community Design Principles and Development Standards Code Analysis - Demonstrate how the proposed structure is consistent with relevant sections of Article 2 of the Land Use code accessible here: https://library.municode.com/co/mead/codes/municipal code?nodeld=CD_CH 16LA USCO ARTIICODEDEST. X 12. Grading and Drainage Plans - A certified drainage report, including erosion control plan, as applicable, must be approved by the appropriate sanitation district (if applicable) prior to submittal to the Town as part of the application. For more details, see Engineering Standards accessible here: https://www.townofinead.org/engineering. X 13. Final Landscape Plan. For requirements, see Section 2-150 of the Land Use Code accessible here: https://librarv.municode.com/co/mead/codes/municipal code?nodeld=CD CH 16LA USCO ARTIICODEDEST S16-2-150LADE. X 14. Exterior Elevations of Proposed Structures/Graphic Visual Aids. Provide complete building elevations, drawn to scale, with illustrations of all colors and identifying major materials to be used in the structure(s). In addition, Staff may require building floor plans, sectional drawings, perspective drawings, models, and/or computer visualizations when the impacts of a proposal warrant such information. For residential (SF/MF) architectural requirements see Section 16-2-180 accessible here: https://library.municode. com/co/mead/codes/municipal_code?nodeld=CD_CH 16LA USCO ARTIICODEDEST S16-2-180REARSIMIMUMIDW. For commercial/industrial architectural requirements see Section 16-2-190 accessible here: https://library.municode.com/co/mead/codes/municipal code?nodeld=CD_CH16LA USCO ARTIICODEDEST Si6-2-180REARSIMIMUMIDW. X 15. Other Information. Any other information as may be requested by the Town. Applicant Certification I hereby certify that the pre -application meeting occurred (in -person or remotely) on (or around) the indicated date and that Town staff provided information regarding application submittal and the review and approval process. Applicant: Date: r� e/ q// /7 a agregyin Y 1 ENLARGED NORTH ELEVATION OVERALL NORTH ELEVATION OVERALL SOUTH ELEVATION fifyl If` -1 E^�;-_t7.F'! !°--1.�'_ sue.-.. tr: , , tit 3 E rT ,. Os Ink Fl . OVERALL EAST ELEVATION 1 •Ir_. . . . Ai 64sb cry Sr ia_UM ♦. 7 ♦_--� -� N �-� �=.=1 Y r I I I ♦ I N t--- t l it t _ - ,, � 0 t=1 N I t �nr - o4c y a r ♦id — / 7Ni 1 1N t-�Nr--i 1— 1 1r 7n,_ ► I I il�C �. -.. �./��-. .fvr----x•--.__ .s•• - i • • t • et _ ■ - • -. - • - - r. - ENLARGED SOUTH ELEVATION SCANNELL r�oru+:(S co z O0 zF— E < w �_1 mw ti NORTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION r �f SCANNELL to QPII N LLJ cc LU`ct LL Lcfj COO OZ C � O O U INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATIVE EXTERIOR MAINT BLDG. ELEVATIONS �f SCANNELL r, (P4 I 5 INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATIVE EXTERIOR FUEL ISLAND ELEVATIONS 0 co Z 1 Z 1 W LU D W J Planning & Zoning Department Community Development Agency Referral Request Today's Date: Referral Comments Due: Project Name: Project Number: Project Type: Project Address: Planning Contact: Email: Phone: September 26, 2018 October 25, 2018 Mead Warehouse 2018-13 Site Plan Generally, northwest of I-25/CR 34 intersection Jeremiah Fettig jfettig@townofmead.org (970) 805-4202 Dear Referral Organization or Agency: Information on the proposal in the Town of Mead referenced above is enclosed for your review and comments. Please reply by the date listed above, any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response by the Planning Department. ❑ We have no objections to this proposal ❑ Please note the following concerns this organization has with this proposal: See attached letter for comments regarding this proposal. Organization or Agency Name: Your Name: Date: Email: Please send your response to jfettig@townofinead.org If you have any further questions regarding the application, please contact the Planner associated with the request as referenced above. Town of Mead 1441 Third Street I Mead, Colorado 80542 I (970) 535-4477 I www.townofmead.org Hello