The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20180500.tiffEXHIBIT INVENTORY CONTROL SHEET Case USR17-0046 - ANADARKO E & P COMPANY, LP, C/O KERR-MCGEE OIL AND GAS ONSHORE, LP Exhibit Submitted By A. Planning Commission B. Planning Commission C. Planning Services D. Applicant E. Staff F. Applicant G. Applicant H. Applicant Debbie Schlosser J. Don Saathoff K. Applicant L. M. N. O. P. a R. S. T. U. V. W. Description Resolution of Recommendation Summary of Hearing (Minutes dated 2/6/2018) PowerPoint Presentation CDPHE Air Permit, dated 2/14/2018 Correspondence, dated 2/15/2018 Correspondence, dated 2/15/2018 Correspondence, dated 2/15/2018 Correspondence, dated 2/15/2018 Correspondence, dated 2/21/2018 Letter from Charles Baum, dated 2/21/2018 PowerPoint Presentation, submitted 2/21/2018 2018-0500 lor Pkik • i "tilt oh r!ua'a $ �' e 414 orCAC s " 1. ,. *zts ��``.sw afri 11 �O$ ' 4 -.Lair41 it I t ilirtiosts 4.. Pi '-� _ IP Public hearings concbrarg this proptifty mil be bard be&ve The Coun4y Planning Comrnkssan and Elonvd or Couvity Comrnimistmofs Both bearings win by he'd sr WELD COUNTY ADIWNISTRATOON BUILD/NG 1150 1xO1. Street • Greetay, CO 80631 lalflftnlfty C. ersi 4c$i PSUW'►U 11►t10 b• Mid Q1 reffege b 201$ m ht,30 Peel Ein tlld OM Cu myCannelESSiOnnt Heinvi v sea be .timid 4 ' c YA Ad, ►! '. 41'1 s46'S itnt igtPt el T! Nap •t -- Vt. I vi nerst nra+' 'P+. eat OM d^ a?+ IOW fa* ,lace hiei .b1 ii O7 !Mry "U— Mr —. — Pa Isslob god a ,. { UMik04etrt. ► own * ,.tii� � ice+ � POCK Fee , - .so sy l • u�-r''�'''OOPS COW 1 it �F r y r. mil. PIPS Ps* al ! ,.. �.t � Pt AiReaP 0 lot frolic A J ,wt.. ' 1 4 !re f • • %At• r 1 tiL +r e.t.a- - —t-W. sn -. ,aa. as —sue — ••.“....••••••••- Public hwennto 4,anatmrservo t* pito1MMy t * be Ned Wont It* Coj PtiforsneV CiXtwart Sad Surd or Cosily Cod► russiona s Stri hOtarvic, heid tar WELD COUNTY ADMtNISTR,AT1ON SUFI -DING 1150 "v" Street • Greeley, CO 80631 tslaa IAA 03S CorSiV2PJ LLU tio.. s t - ,4..r.„ 4i. •f OR M° f� x ii ri* Wes, eat} CIA ATPON rtta.cs (;C yAc .PiS O Itk'• &M , tip. SSttb }' M1ir Twin wit le , los fri.AWI1/411 ra 1 t17(1. w at * - s * W4.0al 35:4-7 Nis $klIae4 tressmilisafr wrl ewe w•w-, , a -v. - AI's, nn.�ry+_.&► .. r •�yy_a ss�� I._ _ . *as Ay �i • • 4 ►. t. b.•T K• 9K'i"arTc.tee, ,, _. • * s r __ .. Ay • aµ... NOV f, . a S MKS ASSES Ibis properly we be heed tare ;r Carty Planning CarraNission anti earl :4 Carey Cos ells heave sir be /wed sr WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIION BUILDING 1150 "O" Street • Greeley. CO 80531 Planning cazerepinpors penningabs red on erg ice Canty Conersagaret Nleswing, oet need on come teas tearbtkos4L aerier% 46144 1. 114 en anus awra "ties Ttii taw) Qty► a'Pas TIMMY Cr *5 Maher Its nee p Li 1 A M 1 ACCESS ONTO COUNTY ROAD 18 (looking SW) e r J R teal Y � County Road 18 Looking Eft from Site Access 1 - II 1 rirmir I w • alr # =.tea a►wlt -r. ffar R.r .9l A IL a r i 4, r 1R. II a F= T in EL LOOKING SE FROM CR 18 ACCESS LI a .i It fft x191! 1i` tY T -se sib e u u aZ s •-• f - F II -u rA i3 111 E sfl tin 1=2 Sal.1Ma fin• �r ��, _. —�. a aster, r— - . -a L i • rir 1'i • salon, LOOKING NORTH AT CR 18 AC M I Li L C WIN NI till Nat OW 4 Sn flags. is Lot ( TA T.. 1 11- P Et ta int . 13 IS LOOKING EAST FROM CR 21 ACCESS LOOKING W/NW FROM COUNTY ROAD 21 ACCESS CR 21 ACCESS L ST/SOUTHEAST TarMr _ r aLa='k: Ti a a. I I� c. r 147. X � !-, — ^ ..64. -.Matt-vi n ■ v n 7 F: V�_ P ri r• SWIM I aroP LOOKING TOWARDS PROPERTY/STORAGE AREA FROM CR 18 r; STATE OF COLORADO COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DIVISION TELEPHONE: (303) 692-3150 CONSTRUCTION PERMIT PERMIT NO: 17WE1090 DATE ISSUED: February 5. 2018 ISSUED TO: Cureton Front Range LLC THE SOURCE TO WHICH THIS PERMIT APPLIES IS DESCRIBED AND LOCATED AS FOLLOWS: Issuance 1 Oil and gas facility. known as the Front Range Gas Plant. located in the SENE, Section 19.T2N, R64W. in Weld County. Colorado. THE SPECIFIC EQUIPMENT OR ACTIVITY SUBJECT TO THIS PERMIT INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING: Equipment ID AIRS Point Description Fugitive 002 Equipment leaks from a natural gas plant HTR2 003 One natural gas fired boiler make, model. serial number to be determined. Design rated at 20 MM Btu per hour. HTR3 004 One natural gas fired boiler make, model. serial number to be determined. Design rated at 11 MM Btu per hour. Pigging 005 Two pigging receivers. One 8 inch and one 6 inch. THIS PERMIT IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO ALL RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE COLORADO AIR QUALITY CONTROL COMMISSION AND THE COLORADO AIR POLLUTION PREVENTION AND CONTROL ACT C.R.S. (25-7-101 et seq), TO THOSE GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS INCLUDED IN THIS DOCUMENT AND THE FOLLOWING SPECIFIC TERMS AND CONDITIONS: REQUIREMENTS TO SELF -CERTIFY FOR FINAL AUTHORIZATION 1 YOU MUST notify the Air Pollution Control Division (the Division) no later than fifteen days of the latter of commencement of operation or issuance of this permit, by submitting a Notice of Startup form to the Division. The Notice of Startup form may be downloaded online at https://www.colorado.gov/pacific/cdphe/other-air-permitting-notices, Failure to notify the Division of startup of the permitted source is a violation of Air Quality Control Commission (AQCC) Regulation No 3, Part B, Section III G.1 and can result in the revocation of the permit. 2. Within one hundred and eighty days (180) of the latter of commencement of operation or issuance of this permit, compliance with the conditions contained in this permit shall be demonstrated to the Division. It is the owner or operator's responsibility to self -certify compliance with the conditions. Failure to demonstrate compliance within 180 days may result in revocation of the permit. (Reference Regulation No, 3, Part B, Ill G 2). AIRS ID 123 9F67 Page 1 of 7 3. This permit shall expire if the owner or operator of the source for which this permit was issued: (i) does not commence construction/modification or operation of this source within 18 months after either, the date of issuance of this construction permit or the date on which such construction or activity was scheduled to commence as set forth in the permit application associated with this permit (ii) discontinues construction for a period of eighteen months or more; (iii) does not complete construction within a reasonable time of the estimated completion date. The Division may grant extensions of the deadline per Regulation No. 3, Part B, III.F.4.b. (Reference: Regulation No_ 3. Part B. III.F 4.) 4. The operator shall complete all initial compliance testing and sampling as required in this permit and submit the results to the Division as part of the self -certification process (Reference: Regulation No. 3, Part B. Section III E.) 5. The operator shall retain the permit final authorization letter issued by the Division. after completion of self -certification. with the most current construction permit. This construction permit alone does not provide final authority for the operation of this source. 6. Point 003, 004: The manufacturer, model number and serial number of the subject equipment must be provided to the Division within one hundred and eighty days (180) after commencement of operation or issuance of this permit, whichever is later. (Reference: Regulation Number 3, Part B, III.G.2.) EMISSION LIMITATIONS AND RECORDS 7 Emissions of air pollutants shall not exceed the following limitations (as calculated in the Division's preliminary analysis). (Reference: Regulation No. 3. Part B. Section II A.4) Annual Limits: Equipment ID AIRS Point Tons per Year Emission Type voc NOx CO Fugitive 002 7.0 -- -- Fugitive HTR2 003 -- 4.4 7.3 Point HTR3 004 -- 2.4 4.1 Point Pigging 005 4.1 -- -- Point See "Notes to Permit Holder" for information on emission factors and methods used to calculate limits. Annual records of the actual emission rates shall be maintained by the owner or operator and made available to the Division for inspection upon request. 8. Point 002: The operator shall calculate actual emissions from this emissions point based on representative component counts for the facility with the most recent gas and liquids analyses. as required in the Compliance Testing and Sampling section of this permit. The operator shall maintain records of the results of component counts and sampling events used to calculate actual emissions and the dates that these counts and events were completed. These records shall be provided to the Division upon request_ PROCESS LIMITATIONS AND RECORDS 9 These sources must be limited to the following maximum consumption. processing and/or operational rates as listed below. Annual records of the actual process rate must be maintained by the applicant and made available to the Division for inspection upon request (Reference: Regulation Number 3. Part B. II A.4) AIRS ID: 123 9F67 Page 2 of 7 Process/Consumption Limits Equipment ID AIRS Point Process Parameter Annual Limit HTR2 003 Consumption of natural gas 174.2 MM scf HTR3 004 Consumption of natural gas 95.8 MM scf Pigging 005 Depressurization events 1095 events per pig receiver The owner or operator shall monitor annual process parameters based on the calendar year. STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS 10. Point 002, 003, 004, 005: Visible emissions shall not exceed twenty percent (20%) opacity during normal operation of the source. During periods of startup, process modification, or adjustment of control equipment visible emissions shall not exceed 30% opacity for more than six minutes in any sixty consecutive minutes. Emission control devices subject to Regulation 7, Sections XII.C.1.d or XVII.B.2.b shall have no visible emissions_ (Reference: Regulation No. 1, Section II A 1. & 4.) 11. Point 002, 003, 004, 005: This source is subject to the odor requirements of Regulation No. 2. (State only enforceable) 12. Point 003, 004: This source is subject to the New Source Performance Standards requirements of Regulation Number 6, Part A, Subpart Dc, Standards of Performance for Small Industrial - Commercial -Institutional Steam Generating Units. 13. Point 003, 004: This source is located in an ozone non -attainment or attainment -maintenance area and subject to the Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) requirements of Regulation Number 3, Part B, III.D.2. The use of a low N0x burner is considered to be RACT for this source. 14. Point 002: This source is subject to Regulation No. 7, Section XII.G Gas -processing plants located in the 8 -hour Ozone Control Area (State Only: or any specific Ozone nonattainment or Attainment/Maintenance Area) shall comply with requirements of this Section XII.G . as well as the requirements of Sections XII.B., XII.C.1.a.. XII.C.1.b., XII.H., and XVI OPERATING & MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS 15. Point 002, 003, 004. 005: This source is not required to follow a Division -approved operating and maintenance plan. COMPLIANCE TESTING AND SAMPLING Initial Testing Requirements 16. Point 002: Within one hundred and eighty days (180) of the latter of commencement of operation or issuance of this permit, the owner or operator shall complete the initial extended gas analysis of gas samples that are representative of volatile organic compound (VOC) and hazardous air pollutants (HAP) that may be released as fugitive emissions. This extended gas analysis shall be used in the compliance demonstration as required in the Emission Limits and Records section of this permit. The operator shall submit the results of the gas analysis and emission calculations to the Division as part of the self -certification process to ensure compliance with emissions limits. 17 Point 002: Within one hundred and eighty days (180) of the latter of commencement of operation or issuance of this permit, the operator shall complete a hard count of components at the source and establish the number of components that are operated in "heavy liquid service", "light liquid service". "water/oil service" and "gas service". The operator shall submit the results to the Division as part of the self -certification process to ensure compliance with emissions limits AIRS ID 123 9F67 Page 3 of 7 Periodic Testing Requirements 18. Point 002: On an annual basis. the owner or operator shall complete an extended gas analysis of gas samples that are representative of volatile organic compounds (VOC) and hazardous air pollutants (HAP) that may be released as fugitive emissions. This extended gas analyses shall be used in the compliance demonstration as required in the Emission Limits and Records section of this permit. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS 19. A revised Air Pollutant Emission Notice (APEN) shall be filed: (Reference: Regulation No. 3. Part A.IIC) a. Annually by April 30'" whenever a significant increase in emissions occurs as follows: For any criteria pollutant: For sources emitting less than 100 tons per year, a change in actual emissions of five (5) tons per year or more, above the level reported on the last APEN; or For volatile organic compounds (VOC) and nitrogen oxides sources (NO.) in ozone nonattainment areas emitting less than 100 tons of VOC or NO. per year. a change in annual actual emissions of one (1) ton per year or more or five percent. whichever is greater. above the level reported on the last APEN: or For sources emitting 100 tons per year or more, a change in actual emissions of five percent or 50 tons per year or more, whichever is less, above the level reported on the last APEN submitted, or For any non -criteria reportable pollutant: If the emissions increase by 50% or five (5) tons per year, whichever is less. above the level reported on the last APEN submitted to the Division. Whenever there is a change in the owner or operator of any facility, process, or activity; or c. Whenever new control equipment is installed, or whenever a different type of control equipment replaces an existing type of control equipment: or d. Whenever a permit limitation must be modified; or e. No later than 30 days before the existing APEN expires. GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS 20. This permit and any attachments must be retained and made available for inspection upon request. The permit may be reissued to a new owner by the APCD as provided in AQCC Regulation No 3. Part B. Section II.B upon a request for transfer of ownership and the submittal of a revised APEN and the required fee_ 21. If this permit specifically states that final authorization has been granted. then the remainder of this condition is not applicable. Otherwise. the issuance of this construction permit does not provide "final" authority for this activity or operation of this source. Final authorization of the permit must be secured from the APCD in writing in accordance with the provisions of 25-7- 114.5(12)(a) C.R.S. and AQCC Regulation No 3. Part B. Section III.G. Final authorization cannot be granted until the operation or activity commences and has been verified by the APCD as conforming in all respects with the conditions of the permit. Once self -certification of all points has been reviewed and approved by the Division, it will provide written documentation of such final authorization. Details for obtaining final authorization to operate are located in the Requirements to Self -Certify for Final Authorization section of this permit. 22. This permit is issued in reliance upon the accuracy and completeness of information supplied by the owner or operator and is conditioned upon conduct of the activity. or construction, installation and operation of the source, in accordance with this information and with representations made AIRS ID 123 9F67 Page 4 of 7 by the owner or operator or owner or operator's agents. It is valid only for the equipment and operations or activity specifically identified on the permit. 23. Unless specifically stated otherwise, the general and specific conditions contained in this permit have been determined by the APCD to be necessary to assure compliance with the provisions of Section 25-7-114.5(7)(a), C.R.S. 24. Each and every condition of this permit is a material part hereof and is not severable. Any challenge to or appeal of a condition hereof shall constitute a rejection of the entire permit and upon such occurrence, this permit shall be deemed denied ab initio. This permit may be revoked at any time prior to self -certification and final authorization by the Air Pollution Control Division (APCD) on grounds set forth in the Colorado Air Quality Control Act and regulations of the Air Quality Control Commission (AQCC), including failure to meet any express term or condition of the permit. If the Division denies a permit, conditions imposed upon a permit are contested by the owner or operator, or the Division revokes a permit, the owner or operator of a source may request a hearing before the AQCC for review of the Division's action. 25. Section 25-7-114.7(2)(a), C.R.S. requires that all sources required to file an Air Pollution Emission Notice (APEN) must pay an annual fee to cover the costs of inspections and administration. If a source or activity is to be discontinued, the owner must notify the Division in writing requesting a cancellation of the permit. Upon notification, annual fee billing will terminate. 26. Violation of the terms of a permit or of the provisions of the Colorado Air Pollution Prevention and Control Act or the regulations of the AQCC may result in administrative, civil or criminal enforcement actions under Sections 25-7-115 (enforcement), -121 (injunctions), -122 (civil penalties), -122.1 (criminal penalties), C.R.S. By: Kirk Bear Permit Engineer Permit Histo Issuance Date Description Issuance 1 This Issuance Issued to Cureton Front Range LLC AIRS ID: 123 9F67 Page 5of7 Notes to Permit Holder at the time of this permit issuance. 1) The permit holder is required to pay fees for the processing time for this permit. An invoice for these fees will be issued after the permit is issued. The permit holder shall pay the invoice within 30 days of receipt of the invoice. Failure to pay the invoice will result in revocation of this permit (Reference: Regulation No. 3, Part A. Section VI.B.) 2) The emission limits contained in this permit are based on the consumption rates requested in the permit application. These limits may be revised upon request of the owner or operator providing there is no exceedance of any specific emission control regulation or any ambient air quality standard A revised air pollution emission notice (APEN) and complete application form must be submitted with a request for a permit revision. 3) This source is subject to the Common Provisions Regulation Part II. Subpart E. Affirmative Defense Provision for Excess Emissions During Malfunctions The owner or operator shall notify the Division of any malfunction condition which causes a violation of any emission limit or limits stated in this permit as soon as possible, but no later than noon of the next working day, followed by written notice to the Division addressing all of the criteria set forth in Part II. E.1. of the Common Provisions Regulation. See: https://www.colorado.gov/pacific/cdphe/aqcc-regs 4) The following emissions of non -criteria reportable air pollutants are estimated based upon the process limits as indicated in this permit. This information is listed to inform the operator of the Division's analysis of the specific compounds emitted if the source(s) operate at the permitted limitations AIRS Point Pollutant CAS # Uncontrolled Emissions (lb/yr) Controlled Emissions (lb/yr) 002 Benzene 71432 424 64 Toluene 108883 411 60 Ethylbenzene 100414 366 46 Xylenes 1330207 377 49 n -Hexane 110543 645 135 003 n -Hexane 110543 314 NA Note. The emission levels for Point 002 are based on the emission factors from Table 2-4 The emission levels for Point 003 are based on emission factors from AP -42 1 4-1.2.3. TOC Emission Factors (kg/hr-component): Component Gas Service Heavy Oil Light Oil Water/OilService Connectors 2.0E-04 7.5E-06 2.1E-04 1.1E-04 Flanges 3.9E-04 3.9E-07 1.1E-04 2.9E-06 Open-ended Lines 2.0E-03 1 4E-04 1.4E-03 2.5E-04 Pump Seals 2.4E-03 NA 1.3E-02 2 4E-05 Valves 4 5E-03 8.4E-06 2.5E-03 9.8E-05 Other 8.8E-03 3.2E-05 7.5E-03 1.4E-02 AIRS ID: 123 9F67 Page 6 of 7 Source. EPA -453/R95-017 Compliance with emissions limits in this permit will be demonstrated by using the TOC emission factors listed in the table above with representative component counts. multiplied by the VOC content from the most recent gas and liquids analyses. 5) In accordance with C.R.S. 25-7-114.1, each Air Pollutant Emission Notice (APEN) associated with this permit is valid for a term of five years from the date it was received by the Division. A revised APEN shall be submitted no later than 30 days before the five-year term expires. Please refer to the most recent annual fee invoice to determine the APEN expiration date for each emissions point associated with this permit For any questions regarding a specific expiration date call the Division at (303)-692-3150. 6) This source is subject to 40 CFR. Part 60. Subpart 0000a — Standards of Performance for Crude Oil and Natural Gas Facilities for which Construction. Modification. or Reconstruction Commenced after September 18, 2015 (See June 3, 2016 Federal Register posting — effective August 2, 2016.) This rule has not yet been incorporated into Colorado Air Quality Control Commission's Regulation No. 6. A copy of the complete subpart is available at the Office of the Federal Register website at: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2016/06/03/2016-11971/oil-and-natural-qas-sector- emission-standards-for-new-reconstructed-and-modified-sources 7) This facility is classified as follows: Applicable Requirement Status Operating Permit Minor Source NANSR Minor Source 8) Full text of the Title 40. Protection of Environment Electronic Code of Federal Regulations can be found at the website listed below. http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/ Part 60: Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources NSPS 60.1 -End Subpart A — Subpart KKKK NSPS Part 60, Appendixes Appendix A — Appendix I Part 63: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Source Categories MACT 63.1-63 599 Subpart A — Subpart Z MACT 63.600-63.1199 Subpart AA — Subpart DDD MACT 63.1200-63.1439 Subpart EEE — Subpart PPP MACT 63.1440-63.6175 Subpart QQQ — Subpart YYYY MACT 63.6580-63.8830 Subpart ZZZZ — Subpart MMMMM MACT 63.8980 -End Subpart NNNNN — Subpart XXXXXX 9) A self certification form and guidance on how to self -certify compliance as required by this permit may be obtained online at: http://www.colorado.qov/pacific/cdphe/air-permit-self-certification AIRS ID 123 9F67 Page 7 of 7 Tisa Juanicorena From: Sent: To: Subject: Chris Gathman Thursday, February 15, 2018 5:11 PM Tisa Juanicorena FW: Anadarco hearing 2/6/18 - USR17-0046 exhibit From: Elizabeth Relford Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2018 10:36 AM To: Chris Gathman <cgathman@weldgov.com> Subject: FW: Anadarco hearing 2/6/18 Chris, Here is the most recent correspondence I had with Mr. Neal. Thanks, Elizabeth Elizabeth Relford Deputy Director Weld County Public Works 1111 H Street PO Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632-0758 Email: erelford@co.weld.co.us Office: (970) 400- 3748 Mobile: (970) 673-5836 Web: http://www.co.weld.co.us Confidentiality Notice: This electronic transmission and any attached documents or other writings are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify sender by return e-mail and destroy the communication. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action concerning the contents of this communication or any attachments by anyone other than the named recipient is strictly prohibited. From: Elizabeth Relford Sent: Monday, February 12, 2018 8:54 AM To: Dennis Neal <nealdennis59@gmail.com> Cc: Dawn Anderson (dranderson@weldgov.com) <dranderson@weldgov.com>; Evan Pinkham <epinkham@weldgov.com>; Mike Livengood <mlivengood@weldgov.com>; Curtis Hall <chall@weldgov.com>; Jay 1 McDonald <imcdonald@weldgov.com>; Tom Parko Jr. <tparko@weldgov.com> Subject: RE: Anadarco hearing 2/6/18 Mr. Neal, I told you I would reach back out to after the county collected traffic counts on WCR 18; therefore, I wanted to let you know the three-day counts came back at 370 trips per day with 32% truck traffic. When compared to other gravel roads in the county, we have some with roads 1,000 trips per day and 70% truck traffic, which remain gravel. We recognize this does change the maintenance responsibility the county will have to comply with for dust mitigation, which we will bring up to the Commissioners at the hearing. Thanks, Elizabeth Elizabeth Relford Deputy Director Weld County Public Works 1111 H Street PO Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632-0758 Email: erelford@co.weld.co.us Office: (970) 400- 3748 Mobile: (970) 673-5836 Web: http://www.co.weld.co.us Confidentiality Notice: This electronic transmission and any attached documents or other writings are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify sender by return e-mail and destroy the communication. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action concerning the contents of this communication or any attachments by anyone other than the named recipient is strictly prohibited. From: Dennis Neal [mailto:nealdennis59@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2018 10:12 AM To: Elizabeth Relford <erelford@weldgov.com> Subject: Anadarco hearing 2/6/18 Hello Elizabeth; After I e -mailed copies of all the truck traffic on WCR 18 to Chris Gathman on January 18, I received a phone call from Reed at Anadarco. Reed informed me that Anadarco has the right to do what they are doing. I asked about the belly dump trucks and, Reed said no they are not agriculture or legal. I asked about the hay bale trucks and, Reed once again said they are not agricultural or legal either. We discussed the issue further and Reed stated that they would not be there much longer. I asked if he could tell me how much longer, and how many more trucks. Reed said he would find out and get back to me. January 25, Reed called me back and said he could not tell me how much longer or how many trucks to expect. I told Reed that they were running hundreds of trucks per day before and, asked him how many trucks we can expect per day? Reed told me that they have no idea. My question is How many trucks will travel on this dirt road?, in total?, daily? How can Weld county make a decision without the traffic volume? 2 Thank You! Dennis Neal 303-775-9297 3 Tisa Juanicorena From: Sent: To: Subject: Dear Tisa, Chris Gathman Thursday, February 15, 2018 5:10 PM Tisa Juanicorena FW: Anadarco photos Here is some correspondence for USR17-0046. I realize this did not get into the record for the Planning Commission hearing. I have a couple of more e -mails to forward. Regards, Chris Gathman Planner III Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue tel: 970-400-3537 fax: 970-400-4098 V Confidentiality Notice: This electronic transmission and any attached documents or other writings are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify sender by return e-mail and destroy the communication. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action concerning the contents of this communication or any attachments by anyone other than the named recipient is strictly prohibited. From: Keiser, Nathan[mailto:Nathan.Keiser@anadarko.com] Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2018 12:30 PM To: Chris Gathman <cgathman@weldgov.com> Subject: RE: Anadarco photos Chris, Thanks for passing along. For your information, we notified ALL individuals who signed our sign -in sheet at our community meeting of the February 6th hearing via a phone call. We did not notify those who opted not to sign the sheet. This included Dennis Neal. 1 The use of the mud farm has pretty much stopped minus the small amount of traffic needed to cultivate the land and minor hydrovac trucks as shown in the pictures. Even the numbers supplied by our traffic study show that this does not create a burden on the surrounding community. The mud farm was permitted almost 4 years ago with the COGCC. According to the property portal Mr. Neal didn't purchase the property until well after this use was permitted. Also, a colleague spoke with all people who signed the sheet and almost every one of them mentioned how they were happy with the level of traffic on the roads. You can do what you'd like with this info, but we have no obligation to cease use of the mud farm since it's not associated with a land -use case and permitted by the State. Do you plan on responding to Mr. Neal? If not I may call him and tell him the same information. Thanks Chris! Nathan From: Chris Gathman [mailto:cgathman@weldgov.com] Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2018 12:03 PM To: Keiser, Nathan <Nathan.Keiser@anadarko.com> Subject: FW: Anadarco photos One more e-mail. I am forwarding to PW. From: Dennis Neal [mailto:nealdennis59@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2018 11:46 AM To: Chris Gathman <cgathman@weldgov.com> Subject: Anadarco photos Click here for Anadarko's Electronic Mail Disclaimer 2 Tisa Juanicorena From: Sent: To: Subject: Chris Gathman Thursday, February 15, 2018 5:10 PM Tisa Juanicorena FW: USR17-0046 Traffic Study - USR17-0046 exhibit From: Keiser, Nathan[mailto:Nathan.Keiser@anadarko.com] Sent: Friday, January 26, 2018 9:33 AM To: Evan Pinkham <epinkham@weldgov.com> Cc: Chris Gathman <cgathman@weldgov.com> Subject: RE: USR17-0046 Traffic Study Good morning Evan, Here is the response from our traffic contractor in italics. Is this sufficient or do you need something additional? It looks like there are three comments from the County: • Speed limit we used in model was assumed to be 30 mph and county is stating all their roads are 55 mph o We can certainly update the synchro models to reflect the correct speed limit for all roadways located inside the study area. This update will not affect the level of service documentation we have in the report as speed in Sycnhro is only used to determine timing and offsets between signalized intersections. The study intersections in our analysis are all stop controlled, therefore, the delay reported would not be affected by this model update. • We used an estimated growth rate of 1% and county is stating they have estimated 6.2% growth rate. o We can apply this revised growth factor to our collected traffic counts and revise the existing and future scenarios as needed. This increase in growth rate would add approximately 3 to 5 vehicles to an intersection approach depending on the existing volume that was collected. Overall, this update to the growth rate would increase the LOS for each intersection, however the overall reporting would be the same - very minor change in LOS for all study intersection. • Show analysis for site driveways o We have included the approach delay for the site driveways as part of the future traffic analysis. In short, I don't anticipate updating these assumptions relative to comments 1 and 2 will have a substantive impact on the conclusions — i.e., the impact is still very minor. The third comment from the County is a bit confusing, as we had included that analysis already - these are shown in Tables 6, 7 and 8. From: Evan Pinkham mailto:epinkham@weldgov.com] Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2018 11:55 AM To: Keiser, Nathan <Nathan.Keiser@anadarko.com> Cc: Chris Gathman <cgathman@weldgov.com> Subject: USR17-0046 Traffic Study Nathan, We were going through the traffic study, and had some issues that we wanted to have resolved prior to the Planning 1 Commission hearing. Below are the comments related to the study. Please send me the updated study that resolves this issues. The traffic review study for the Strear Farms Stockpile Area, prepared by Arcadis for Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, was reviewed on 11-29-17 and a few questions arose. First, on page 2, WCR 18 and WCR 21 are both assumed to be 30 mph roadways. All Weld County roads are 55 mph unless clearly signed otherwise. If WCR 18 and WCR 21 are assumed to be 55 mph, how does that affect the Traffic Impact Study and the Level of Service at the respective intersections that were analyzed? Second, page 6 states that an annual growth rate of 1% was used to forecast future background traffic. According to the 2035 Transportation Plan, which can be found on the Weld County Public Works website, this facility is located in Subarea 6 which has an annual growth rate of 6.2%. If 6.2% is used as the growth rate, how does this affect the Traffic Impact Study and the Level of Service at the respective intersections that were analyzed? Thirdly, the traffic impact study should consider the entrances into and out of the site and how they are preforming with the anticipated traffic. Thanks, Evan Evan Pinkham Development Review Planner Weld County Public Works 1111 H Street, P.O. Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 (970)400-3727 Confidentiality Notice: This electronic transmission and any attached documents or other writings are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify sender by return e-mail and destroy the communication. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action concerning the contents of this communication or any attachments by anyone other than the named recipient is strictly prohibited. Click here for Anadarko's Electronic Mail Disclaimer 2 Tisa Juanicorena Dm: .,, nt: To: Subject: Chris Gathman Thursday, February 15, 2018 5:16 PM Tisa Juanicorena FW: USR17-0046 - a couple of questions and heads up on hearing schedule - USR17-0046 exhibit From: Keiser, Nathan[mailto:Nathan.Keiser@anadarko.com] Sent: Monday, January 29, 2018 2:27 PM To: Chris Gathman <cgathman@weldgov.com> Subject: RE: USR17-0046 - a couple of questions and heads up on hearing schedule This was your response from September after the community meeting (below in italics). Just checking to see if there is anything else that you are proposing (beyond what is below in italics) since September — We have greatly reduced traffic on the location — We have also been applying a lot of water to the roads since the community expressed the opinion that mag chloride was not preferred. We may evaluate alternating mag/water applications since Mr. Neal prefers the mag. Please note that even though mud farm and hauling has been restricted as night, there is a large oil and gas production facility on the location and it may be required to have trucks at the facility during evening hours. This is purely for safety reasons. 2) Some previous correspondence (September 2017) indicated that the mud farm had met its limit and would not be accepting tailings for the next year. Just verifying that this means - does this mean no tailings will be accepted until 2019? We have stopped hauling in drill cuttings. I will have more of a firm date tomorrow on when we expect to be bringing more in though. Also, there are a few daily hydrovac trucks visiting the site. This helps keep dust down on the site by keeping some moisture at the location. Without this the farm would be dusty. 3) Did you happen to contact Dennis Neal? We have spoken with him twice in the past week. He is mostly upset that we have not been asked to pave a road, when he was asked to pave a road on one of his development projects in the County. I'm not sure what or where this is but he will be unhappy no matter what. 4) There are 4 cases on the agenda — the 1st two cases are not mine (but I see no SPO objections) — these will be heard 1st. Then USR17-0065 (proposed gas plant) — we have received a couple of objections. Then USR17-0046. FYI: I have been informed that Mr. Neal may have hired an attorney. From: Keiser, Nathan Sent: Monday, January 29, 2018 10:02 AM To: 'Chris Gathman' <cgathman@weldgov.com> Subject: RE: USR17-0046 - a couple of questions and heads up on hearing schedule Good morning Chris, I see you were burning the midnight oil and working on Sunday! I enjoy doing that sometimes since the office is so quiet. I'll have these answers for you soon. Working on getting them now. Also, we have communicated multiple times with Ir. Neal. I'll provide more clarity around that when I responds to the other questions. Thanks Chris! 1 1) This was your response from September after the community meeting (below in italics). Just checking to see if there is anything else that you are proposing (beyond what is below in italics) since September. 2) Some previous correspondence (September 2017) indicated that the mud farm had met its limit and would not be accepting tailings for the next year. Just verifying that this means - does this mean no tailings will be accepted until 2019? 3) Did you happen to contact Dennis Neal? 4) There are 4 cases on the agenda — the 1st two cases are not mine (but I see no SPO objections) — these will be heard 1st. Then USR17-0065 (proposed gas plant) — we have received a couple of objections. Then USR17-0046. FYI: I have been informed that Mr. Neal may have hired an attorney. From: Chris Gathman [mailto:cgathman@weldgov.com] Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2018 10:56 AM To: Keiser, Nathan <Nathan.Keiser@anadarko.com> Subject: RE: USR17-0046 - a couple of questions and heads up on hearing schedule Nathan, Staff recommendation has been drafted and is being reviewed by staff — I anticipate having to you by Monday or Tuesday of this week. I had a few questions/clarifications: 1) This was your response from September after the community meeting (below in italics). Just checking to see if the -- is anything else that you are proposing (beyond what is below in italics) since September. 2) Some previous correspondence (September 2017) indicated that the mud farm had met its limit and would not be accepting tailings for the next year. Just verifying that this means - does this mean no tailings will be accepted until 2019? 3) Did you happen to contact Dennis Neal? 4) There are 4 cases on the agenda — the 1st two cases are not mine (but I see no SPO objections) — these will be heard 1st. Then USR17-0065 (proposed gas plant) — we have received a couple of objections. Then USR17-0046. FYI: I have been informed that Mr. Neal may have hired an attorney. Thanks, Chris Gathman Planner III Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue tel: 970-400-3537 fax: 970-400-4098 2 Confidentiality Notice: This electronic transmission and any attached documents or other writings are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify sender by return nail and destroy the communication. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action concerning the ntents of this communication or any attachments by anyone other than the named recipient is strictly prohibited. as an FYI we did have the community meeting and are working through the concerns that were brought up during the meeting. Some of the items that have already been set into motion are: . . • . . Putting dust suppression on both County Roads and roads inside the facility Limiting soil hauling during daylight hours Closing and locking facility during the evening Signs on property along county road (see example) Provided response line information to residents (see example) From: Keiser, Nathan[mailto:Nathan.Keiser@anadarko.com] Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2018 12:30 PM To: Chris Gathman <cgathman@weldgov.com> Subject: RE: Anadarco photos rhris, Thanks for passing along. For your information, we notified ALL individuals who signed our sign -in sheet at our community meeting of the February 6th hearing via a phone call. We did not notify those who opted not to sign the sheet. This included Dennis Neal. The use of the mud farm has pretty much stopped minus the small amount of traffic needed to cultivate the land and minor hydrovac trucks as shown in the pictures. Even the numbers supplied by our traffic study show that this does not create a burden on the surrounding community. The mud farm was permitted almost 4 years ago with the COGCC. According to the property portal Mr. Neal didn't purchase the property until well after this use was permitted. Also, a colleague spoke with all people who signed the sheet and almost every one of them mentioned how they were happy with the level of traffic on the roads. You can do what you'd like with this info, but we have no obligation to cease use of the mud farm since it's not associated with a land -use case and permitted by the State. Do you plan on responding to Mr. Neal? 'r lot I may call him and tell him the same information. Thanks Chris! 3 Nathan From: Chris Gathman [mailto:cgathman@weldgov.com] Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2018 12:03 PM To: Keiser, Nathan <Nathan.Keiser@anadarko.com> Subject: FW: Anadarco photos One more e-mail. I am forwarding to PW. From: Dennis Neal [mailto:nealdennis59@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2018 11:46 AM To: Chris Gathman <cgathman@weldgov.com> Subject: Anadarco photos Click here for Anadarko's Electronic Mail Disclaimer 4 • Tisa Juanicorena Sent: To: Cc: Subject: FYI. For this morning's hearing. Chris Gathman Wednesday, February 21, 2018 7:27 AM Tisa Juanicorena Ben Frissell; Bob Choate; Esther Gesick; Keiser, Nathan; Evan Pinkham; Dawn Anderson FW: USR17-0046 Strear Farm Soil Stockpiling/Hauling/Hay Storage Operation From: Debbie Schlosser [mailto:foothil4@aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 10:01 PM To: Karla Ford <kford@weldgov.com>; Mike Freeman <mfreeman@weldgov.com>; Julie Cozad <jcozad@weldgov.com>; Barbara Kirkmeyer <bkirkmeyer@weldgov.com>; Sean Conway <sconway@weldgov.com>; Steve Moreno <smoreno@weldgov.com>; Troy Swain <tswain@weldgov.com>; Chris Gathman <cgathman@weldgov.com> Subject: USR17-0046 Strear Farm Soil Stockpiling/Hauling/Hay Storage Operation Date: February 20, 2018 To: Weld County Board of Commissioners From: Scott and Debbie Schlosser, 10624 County Road 18, Fort Lupton, CO 970-532-3253 Re: Docket #2018-12, PL2523 - A Site Specific Development Plan and Use by Special Review Permit, USR17-0046. ear Commissioners: Due to an emergent illness in our family, resulting in us having to travel out of state, we will be unable to attend the Board of Commissioners meeting tomorrow, February 21, 2018, where we had hoped to speak against Use by Special Review Permit USR17-0046. We did attend the Planning Commission meeting held on February 6, 2018 for over three hours, but due to the length of discussions on other items on the agenda prior to USR17- 0046, as well as a previously scheduled doctor's appointment, we found ourselves unable to voice our concerns during that meeting. Therefore, we would like to respectfully request that the Weld County Board of Commissioners vote NO on the Use by Special Review permit for the Strear Farm Soil stockpiling/hauling, hay storage operation, and drill cutting spreading operation for the following reasons: 1. Tremendous increase in noise and dust from dirt stockpiling operation. Last August, during the height of Anadarko's UNPERMITTED dirt hauling operation, the noise level and dust became completely unbearable. How does the county and Anadarko plan on mitigating this? Who will be responsible for maintaining the deterioration of the road caused by such a large number of trucks? Who will oversee the operation of the staging area for the dirt operation since Anadrako uses contracted truckers (i.e., compliance with ingress/egress, ensuring covered loads, adherence to posted speed limit, jake brake compliance, etc.)? 2. We do not believe this facility is in keeping with the Weld County Agricultural Zone District. This operation in no way constitutes anything resembling AGRICULTURAL USE, other than the storage of hay, which will not be used for livestock but only for use at oil well drilling sites (INDUSTRIAL USE). We have grave concerns about the potential for an uncontrolled fire from this enormous hay stockpiling i area (which is already in place, even though it has not been permitted and, in fact, has been in violation since June 21, 2017 (Zoning Violation Case #7CV 17-00128). 3. Potential for contamination of the water table from chemicals contained in drill cuttings, including uranium -238 and radium -226, as well as radioactive isotopes uranium -234, thorium -230, lead -210 and polonium -210. Since our property must rely on well water, we are very concerned about the potential future impact this may have on our only water source. Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. Sincerely, Scott and Debbie Schlosser 2 February 21, 2018 To whom it may concern, I am writing this memo to confirm my conversation with a neighbor whom I believe plans to attend a meeting concerning upgrading (paving) Roads 18 and 21. Back in 1970, my wife Marian (deceased) and I purchased our present property at a reasonable price based upon the area's poor conditions and the need of a handyman to do allot of work to make my property livable. J. L. Sears Reality, Fort Lupton, was the business we dealt with in the purchase of this 8519 WCR property. There were no trees, no driveways and many other things expected with any property. The previous owners were Bill and Anne Steele, whom, while residing here were constantly on the County's back to improve (pave) the roads against being rough and dusty as well as be safer to drive on. Soon after the contract was completed, Mr. Sears (deceased) as well as Anne Steele both told us that appropriations were approved to have roads 18, 20 and 21 paved within a period of eight (8) years. That would be about 1978 (30 years ago) and nothing has been done except road 20 was paved two and a half years ago. I had my two driveways sloped to provide a level access between a paved approach between the road and my home with a trust in the County to live up to what we were told. At my present age (84), I am not expecting to see any progress in my lifetime, as housing developments are a priority, being paved due to dense populated area and more tax payers available to support the County. We have, however, added a few homes, scattered here and there, but not enough to convince someone to do something to make things safer and cleaner to drive on. Anadarko has also talked with someone in the County concerning the poor conditions for their employees and equipment safety. The geologist who approached the County was (I believe) Rhead Cannon, who's office phone number is 720-929-6858. I am sure he or another representative would support us in the effort to have the County get the lead out and make an effort to get the roads cleaner and safer. I nearly lost my life a year ago at intersection 18 and 21 due to high overgrowth and un-maintained intersections. (They cut the tall grass down the day after the accident.) Guess I have said enough about the past and would love to see a brighter, cleaner and safer means of travel on these poor road conditions, soon before I leave this world. The grading maintenance is done well, but it lasts only a couple days and when it rains, they are very slippery, rutty and dangerous, especially where treated for dust. I hope this memo may help in getting things done sooner to make the area a better and safer place to live in. Sincerely Charles M. Baum Strear Farms - USR Application PLEASE SILENCE CELL PHONES ANADARKO ROCKIES TEAM Strear Farms - USR Application PLEASESILENCE CELL PHONE Strear Farms - History • Purchased in 2011 by Anadarko for proposed drilling operations, E&P waste management, and agricultural operations ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORPORATION Strear Farms - Multi Use Location to Mud Farm - Permitted by COGCC in 2014 - Centralized E&P Waste Management Facility to Accepts water -based bentonitic drill cuttings from drilling activities b Hydrovac mud for dust suppression S Mud not impacted by hydrocarbons ` Agricultural Use - In accordance with dry -land farming practices - Wheat, dry -land grasses, and sunflowers w Intermittent Use ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORPORATION Strear Farms - Multi Use Location is Existing Wells and Production Facilities on site for Anadarko operated wells to Existing Wells and Production Facilities on site for wells owned by other operators ANADARKO PETRO LEUI'I CORPORATION Strear Farms - Multi Use Location (continued) dSoil and Hay Bale Stockpile Area - Used to store material for construction of drill pads 'Multiple locations throughout the County to traffic impacts to local municipalities e Intermittent Use Soil and Hay Bale Stockpile Location ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORPORATION Operational Path Forward for Traffic Mitigation to Community Notifications -During times when heavier traffic is expected notices will be sent to surrounding community. Similar approach to drilling activities. Proactive Dust Suppression -Application of mag chloride and/or water prior to usage and then continuous applications Minimal use of Mud Farm during 2018 to Limit hours of operation from 7 am to 6 pm is Split Use - During times when traffic is heavier at the mud farm, efforts will be made to use soil and hay bales from alternative locations. Continued conversations with Mike Livengood ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORPORATION Questions? 7 Hello