The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20182801.tiffINVENTORY OF ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION Applicant Enrique & Elisa Guerrero Case Number USR16-0046 Submitted or Prepared Prior to Hearing At Hearing 1 Surrounding Property 2018 Owner - Ed and Sheryl Kosorok letter received May 29, Surrounding Property June 11, 2018 Owner - William and Mary Haberkon letter received 32018 Surrounding Property Owner - Kay Golderman email received August 20, 4 Surrounding Property Owner - Karen Lovewell letter received August 20, 2018 X 5 Surrounding Property Owner - Peggy Cline email received August 16, 2018 X 6 Applicant 24, letter 2018 - response to the Surrounding Property Owners concerns July X I hereby certify that the six items identified herein were submitted to the Department of Planning Services at or prior to the scheduled Planning Commissioners hearing. Diana Aungst, Planner II Re: Case USR1&-0046 We are Ed and Sheryl Kosorok, and we live at 3923 County Road 6 Erie, Co. 80516, which is directly East of the property applying for a Commercial Parking Yard. I have many concerns regarding this application. 1. Our home structure is only 65 ft. from the access road to the back of the property where the trucks would be parked. Our bedrooms are on the West side of the house and we are already experiencing the noise and vibration from the few trucks that are already there. 2. We have issues with the exhaust of vehicles early in the morning when they are being warmed up, especially in the summer when we would normally open a window, This with just the few trucks there currently. 3, When speaking to the owner, we were under the impression that the request was for three dump trucks and a side dumper. We are sure that if it is approved for 20 trucks, there would soon be 20 trucks. I was also not aware that there are currently 8 employees that would be adding to traffic in and out, I understood that it was just the immediate family. This number of trucks would be totally unacceptable. 4, There is currently too much heavy traffic on Road 6, with Oil and Gas and Landfill traffic, and the road has no shoulders or sidewalks. As with all of this traffic, we are concerned with the safety standards of the trucks, and proper licensing of the operators. We believe a lot of the operators currently driving down our road are not the safest drivers, and some of the trucks are considerably old. We are constantly bombarded with speeding and loud vehicles already, As far as compatibility, the businesses mentioned in the application are as follows. 1. Asphalt Specialties, which is over a half mile to the north with open pasture in between. 2. Blue Mountain Landscape is around a half mile to the south, and also has open pasture between us. it is located in Broomfield County 3. Lovewe&l Fencing only has a couple of pickups and a Flatbed for their work. 4. The businesses to the East are across the Interstate from us. All of the properties near the proposed site are residences, to the east, west, and across the street to the south, We are all for people making a living. We have existed ok with the current 4 or 5 trucks. Most are dump trucks, not semi's. As it is now, we can live with it. As proposed, the site would be totally unacceptable as it would be too much noise, exhaust, vibration and traffic. We are residences, zoned agriculture, and are not commercial. We don't feel a large truckk parking operation would be compatible with the neighborhood, and would negatively affect our property values. Sincerely, Ed and Sheryl Kosorok fiAmi ie4=J; RE : Case U SR 1B-0046 We are William & Mary Ann Haberkon We live at 3733 County RD. 6 Erie, Co.8O516 Which is 3 houses West of the property applying for Commerical Parking Yard. 14 We have issues with the fact they want 20 parking spaces which means they will soon have 20 trucks On the property which is unacceptable. They also have a arena in the back of the property making hard for that many trucks being parked there to turn around and get out into the street. They also Have rodeos there on some weekends and the back is filled with pickups, cars and trailers, besides All the people that come to this event leaving no space for the trucks to be parked. 2. We already have too much traffic on Rd. 6 with oil and gas, and landfill traffic. The road has no Shoulders or sidewalks making more trucks more of a hazard then what it is now. We are also Concerned with the safety standards of all the trucks, and proper licensing of the operators. 3. Why on the application the name is Guerrero Trucking and the postcard says Timbro Ranch & Cattle Company LLC cio Noble Energy? Do they have another business they will be running out of Their home? The business mentioned in his application are not in the ag. business and work for farmers I. Blue Mountain Landscaping which is on the frontage rd. About A mile south of us is in Broomfield County 2. The businesses on the east of us is on the 1-25 frontage rd. Are on commercial property. 3. Lovewell Fencing has only pickups and one 1 ton flatbed and usually don't start until after 7 in the morning and work only 4 days a week 4. Asphalt Specialties is directly behind them but uses the west frontage rd. As there in and Out We feel the site is unacceptable for our road and neighborhood and would also affect all of the Property values here. Sincerely' William and Mary Ann Haberkon s), . fief f 'OIL I Gc hp)1, PI -5 n I flq Diana Aungst From: Kay Goldermann <KGoldermann@hollandhart.com> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2018 10:32 AM To: Diana Aungst Subject: USR18-0046 Dear Ms. Aungst, I am writing to you in regards to USR18-6046 appearing before the Weld County Planning Commission on August 21, 2018. I am against letting Mr. and Mrs. Guerrero park/house semi -trucks on their property. Our neighborhood has been inundated with semis lately. We protested vigorously against Encana (now Crestone) using our road as a way in and out of their facility several years ago. I realize that the trucks would be on Road 6 for a short span, but any amount is too much. As a side note, Mr. and Mrs. Guerrero periodically hold rodeos on their property, and have for years. This causes an extreme amount of traffic, noise and litter for the homes nearby. None of us has protested these rodeos and have let them go on. But I am going to speak up now and say, please do not let them park their semis on their property. We are a neighborhood and large trucks in any capacity do not belong. Thank you for your time and consideration. Kind Regards, Kay Goldermann 3673 CR 6 Erie, CO 303 817 2046 Kay Goldermann Client Accounts Specialist, Holland & Hart LLP 1800 Broadway, Suite 300, Boulder, CO 80302 T 303.473.2705 F 303.473.2720 M 303.817.2046 HOLLAND&I-IArtT in EXHIBIT 3 U S R 18-0046 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message is confidential and may be privileged. If you believe that this email has been sent to you in error, please reply to the sender that you received the message in error; then please delete this e-mail. 1 8-20-18 To: Weld County Re. Public Hearing / Case ##USR18-0046 Name: Enrique and Elisa Guerrero This is a letter stating our concerns and objections to the USR for semi- truck parking. We live approx.. 3 houses west of the proposed address. I recently heard that this permit was going to be for 20 semi trucks. Originally I was told it was going to be for 8 semi trucks. I was not objected to 8 semi trucks, but now it is up to 20 and I feel that it is too much additional large vehicle traffic for our residential road. The noise and busyness for the closest of the next door neighbors is going to be a lot for them. We are having difficulties as it is with too much commercial traffic down Road 6. Thank you for listening to my concerns. Karen Lovewell I 3693 County Road 6 Erie, Co 303-587-4676 C EXHIBIT 4 U R 18-0046 From: Peggy Cleve To: Diana Aungst Subject: USR1B-0046 Date: Thursday, August 16, 2018 3:35:20 PM Dear Ms Aungst: This email is in opposition to USR 18-0046. With the unmonitored traffic now on CR 6, I can't believe that there would be tracking that would lead to the addition of acceleration and deceleration lanes.With the narrowness of the road, no shoulder, but irrigation ditches on the sides, where could this widening to accommodate these lanes go? I didn't understand how a semi could fit in the entrance with the gate closed and not block CR 6. We have requested more speed limit signs, more monitoring of speeding cars as well as speeding and overweight trucks, but other than a speed trailer for 2 weeks from Erie, those requests have been unfulfilled. With the proximity especially to neighbors to the east, a privacy fence for screening cannot come near to blocking noise and odor of large trucks, especially noticeable in the early hours of 5:30-6:00. Who will monitor the 15 minutes maximum idling? Why are 20 parking spaces needed if there will be 8 trucks and 8 employees, or is the number requested now 12? Or is it 20? How will this be monitored? How will the total number and type of trucks be tracked when that could change daily? At one point the requester mentioned the entrance to the back of the property. I didn't understand that. This USR leaves so many questions to be answered that I believe, with all due respect, Reviewers need to return to the site to measure, inspect and observe the traffic that already overloads CR 6 with no relief in sight for the residents who live here. Thank you for reconsidering more heavy traffic on CR6. Sincerely, Peggy Cline 1895 Carol Dr.. Erie IA I 3 S EXHIBIT 5 U R18-0046 Diana Aungst From: Enrique Guerrero <enriquerrero@aol.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2018 12:07 PM To: Diana Aungst Subject: Re: Neighbors complaint Currently at the moment we have 5 semis 3 are working 1 has no driver 1 spare truck 6 tandem dumps 2 are working 3 sitting without drivers 1 spare truck The trucks get started and are out as soon as they can,no point in idling then there since fuel is my biggest expense There's about 3 acres back there for the trucks to turn around Not everyday all trucks go out some days none go out Sent from my iPhone On Jul 24, 2018, at 11:47 AM, Diana Aungst <daungst@weldgov.com>wrote: Hi Can you please read these two letters and send me an email stating how you are addressing their concerns. I think one of the ways is reducing the number of trucks for 20 to a lower number. Thanks, Diana Aungst, AICP, CFM Planner II Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue - Greeley, Colorado 80631 D: 970-400-3524 O: 970-400-6100 Fax:970-304-6498 daungst(c weldgov.com www.weldgov.com < i m a ge 001. j pg> image 002 .png> image 003 .png <image 004.png> to to EXHIBIT 6 USR18-0046 Confidentiality Notice: This electronic transmission and any attached documents or other writings are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify sender by return e-mail and destroy the communication. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action concerning the contents of this communication or any attachments by anyone other than the named recipient is strictly prohibited. <Exhibit 2.pdf> 1. Hello