HomeMy WebLinkAbout770027.tiff •
FL/ SC
--' J'• K •ecorded at ..1.-__....._..__. o'clock . M... 2 1^1977
L'+''.�3 1'72': ' 16
Rec. No. __ / .._.._... Mary Mn Feuerstein, Recorder
RESOLUTION tI 5/1
RE: REMOVAL OF CONDITION ON ZONING IN RE PARKLAND ESTATES-
NORTH HALF OF SECTION 8 IN TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH OF RANGE
68 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M. IN WELD COUNTY, COLORADO CON-
TAINING 336. 25 ACRES , MORE OR LESS, AND SUBJECT TO ALL
EASEMENTS, ROADS, AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY EXISTING OR OF
RECORD.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County,
�-t
Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home
Rule Charter, are vested with the authority of administering the
affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County,
Colorado, on February 13, 1974 , by resolution, nunc pro tunc, as
O.; of January 30 , 1974 , did re-zone the following described real
estate, to-wit:
The North Half of Section 8 in Township 1 North
of Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. in Weld County,
Colorado, containing 336. 25 acres, more or less,
and subject to all easements, roads, and right-
of-ways existing or of record.
to "E" estates district, planned unit development, subject to four
(4) seperate conditions, and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County,
Colorado, by resolution, did, on the 10th day of January, 1977,
extend the time for complying with the aforesaid four (4) conditions
until December 31, 1977, and
WHEREAS, in the opinion of the Board of County Commissioners
of Weld County, Colorado, condition number 3, which reads as fol-
lows :
3. Subject to complying with the recommendations
of the Town of Erie, Colorado, regarding adequate
sewer and water service for the area re-zoned.
is invalid and should be removed as a condition to the zoning on
the aforedescribed real estate.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Com-
missioners of Weld County, Colorado that the aforementioned con-
dition number 3 regarding the re-zoning of the real estate described
above, be and hereby is removed.
The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made
and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 13th day of
yC, / • . ' 770027
P '
• ikooK
• • 093 • • ii.'7 `-216
a - .2
April, A.D. , 1977.
The above and foregoing Resolution was read into the record
and signed on the 13th day of April, A.D. , 1977.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
-
ATTEST: a p -1- omitZ?�r✓
Weld County Clerk and Recorder
and Clerk to the Board
By:, 'Lx ,2'V ( , /,/1 /{L. Ifti- 6Cr%__-�.
Deputy County Clerk
(APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Asst.-Cowl y ttorney
:77-
co K+ > t -• n 11
r^ vs] Z m
t \ ....,kj r t-, n n O n
7
O .n 7.rr• O O T G a
o o ?L
izx on L.)o N
. ; �` O r n c
T' C 70Nhem
747
v
art, 477 at.444,) Cr-44.4.4tielo /sea awl,
qt : %ai.R Ho. 77 -
iL a, let )2'tt
0-1.2ag4tiliCeZ
conaao tit .091.1.4a c A 41=-%.
GO
art , /3, fl77. -t2il'r?,
avrt_ arim-d74
'erre . 7 4- Slate-L, as44>e
lin_ am- art cz,t, %*--af
4taelt Gan. 3 att.
Net I *owl ? /S77
2
ardp cer_ara<14,
og t
J e. .„ , t a
haiLç At G
h a 74
ac.-per` t
4,51 Z ru‘ �
a/J.-to A., -04 fra,Le-cr&L-0
• • WEI® MINTY if: YVINEtS
1THijJt )t7f
I
March 28, 1977 )fjMAR3Oi977qf
June Steinmark
Chairwoman Weld County Commissioners
Weld County Centennial Center
Greeley, Colorado 806,1
Dear Mre. Steinmarkt
For some time now or I should say since the new Commissioners
took office, we have been watching with interest, the different
problems confronting Weld County.
It appears for the most part, that since we have been residents
in Weld County, we now have some independent thinkers on the
commission who are trying to sincerely meet the needs and prob-
lems with thought and reality. Congratulations to your hoard
for a sometimes unappreciated job.
We would also like to comment on some of the issues we are person-
ally interested ins
1. The proposal being considered for dog control
in Weld County is a minor problem now which
we feel is the responsibility of the dog
owners. This may not be the case throughout
Weld County, but it seems most families in our
immediate area keep up all their animals ade-
quately and do not infringe on other people.
If the time comes when there ie a particular
isolated problem it should be handled among
the residents and not make a blanket control
because someone abuses this privilege.
2. On January 28, 1977 I sent a letter to our
tax assessor, Mr. Herb Hansen, asking what
I thought to he four relatively simple quest-
tions concerning our real estate but was com-
pletely ignored. Is it possibly to expect we
do not have a right to know the answers? If
we do not have the right to know, wouldn' t it
have peen just common courtesy to acknowledge
receipt of the letter? If the answers to the
questions I asked are available, we would still
be interested in having them. (Enclosed copy)
i i
5. We would like to know when the temporary
permit on Mr. Bob Brown's office trailer
in Carmacar Ranchettes is due to expire and
since this seems to be no longer in use,
when most likely will it be moved out of
the project? Also have the roads in Carma—
car become the property of the county as we
were to understand they would be? During
the last snow storm we had a couple of
drifts on the roads and to the entrance of
Carmacar which represented a very minor prob—
lem this time but in the future what is the
status of our road maintenance ?
Lastly I understand after talking to Shirley Koch, Vice President
of Citizens Committee For Planned Community Levelopment, today,
we are in for another hearing on Parkland Development April 15,
1977 at 2100 p.m. It is our prayerful desire that hopefully this
will be turned down once and for all from a number of standpoints.
First of all it is really a safety hazard as you would see in times
past especially on Sunday afternoons if you lived here and exper-
ienced light planes bouncing up and down and around with all the
families living in the area in danger. The wind in this area
changes unbelievable from one minute to the next and its absolute
insanity to put a landing strip in a populated area such as this.
Also I think the developers owe something to these communities
they move into, to provide adequate necessities and preparations
such as building and maintenance of decent roads, quality domestic
water, septic tanks that work without becoming a health hazard or
an additional financial and psycological burden on the buyer to do
whatever he can to rectify a bad water level or soil condition, and
maybe not even be able to correct it to make a septic tank work.
Better not to encourage and develop an area such as this as we do
have our problems already in Carmacar along these lines.
The schools are overeroaded and certainly not a: le to handle a
large influx. One school in Adams County made accommodations to
handle a development and now those children are raised and the
residents are mostly older and they have to much school. These
are costly and necessary commodities and are usually left in the
hands of the taxpayers to resolve and the developer has reaped a
healthy harvest free of responsibility. We're not against progress
and a decent place for families to live but I feel it should be
humane and democratic and not just the monetary gain of abitious
investors.
4
1 • •
- 3 -
Our planning commission, we feel, has done an extensive study
and we also feel they have done a thorough job in study and
fact finding and we appreciate the stand they have taken. Thanks
to them, Mr. Norman Carlson, Mr. Jacabucci, Mr. Roe, Mr. Dunbar
and to yourself for the time and thought spent on this tacky
decision and again we enumerate our concern for turning this
down.
If you feel this letter merits a reply we would appreciate your
doing so.
Yours very truly,
Mr. & Mrs. Shelton McKim
Rt. #1, Box 211—B
Erie, Colorado 80516
cc
Enc. 4
I
TOWN OF ERIE
POLICE DEPARTMENT 645 HOLBROOK FIRE DEPARTMENT
828-3200 BOX 98 828-3232
ERIE, COLORADO 80516
828-3843 449-3085
} MAR 2 5 1977
March 22, 1977
"f:6Lr(. COLO.
The Board of County Commissioners
Weld County, Colorado
915 10th
Greeley, Co. 80631
Reference : Docket No. 77-9
Park Land Associates
Zoning Application Requests
Gentlemen:
In reference to your Notice dated 3/7/77
regarding a public hearing on application
requests for Park Land Associates, please
be advised again that the Town of Erie is
in opposition to Park Land Estates proposals.
Sincerely,
Harlen E. Brock, Mayor
HEB/g
Encl.
Hello