HomeMy WebLinkAbout770019.tiff e°°K 812 Recorded _. ) o'clock .(c_.-M.OCT 2 4 1..,
Rec. No. .._1:13:13113. ... Mary Ann Feuerstein, Recorder
RESOLUTION
RE: GRANT OF CHANGE OF ZONE FROM "A" (AGRICULTURAL) TO "C"
(COMMERCIAL UNIT DEVELOPMENT) FOR LOVEMONT INVESTMENT
CORPORATION.
c ! WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County,
Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home
Rule Charter is vested with the authority of administering the
affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on September 14, 1977 , in
the Chambers of the Board of County Commissioners, Weld County,
Colorado, for the purpose of hearing the petition of Lovemont
Investment Corporation, 6801 S. Yosemite Street, Englewood,
Colorado 80110 , requesting a change of zone from A-Agricultural
District to C-Commercial Unit Development, for a tract of land
located in that portion of the NW4 of Section 26 , Township 3
North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado,
being more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the Na Corner of Said Section 26 , and
considering the North line of said Section 26 as
bearing South 89°25 ' 00" West, with all other
bearings contained herein relative thereto;
Thence South 00°13 ' 00" West, 40. 00 feet to a point
on the South Right-of-Way line of Colorado State
Highway 66 ; Thence South 89°25 ' 00" West, 1270 . 76 feet
along the South Right-of-Way of said Highway 66 to
the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING:
Thence South 89 °25 ' 00" West, 530 . 18 feet along the
South Right-of-Way line of said Highway 66 to a point
on the Right-of-Way line of U.S. Interstate No. 25;
Thence South 85°59 ' 42" West 499 . 81 feet along said
Interstate No. 25; Thence South 16°00 ' 00" West 1088 . 80
feet along said Interstate No. 25 ; Thence South 00°25 ' 30"
West 206. 43 feet along said Interstate No. 25; Thence
North 89°25 ' 10" East 1325. 64 feet; Thence North
00°13 ' 00" East 1279 . 94 feet to the TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING, containing 35. 0 acres , more or less .
WHEREAS , the petitioner was present, and
WHEREAS , there was no opposition to the request of the
petitioner for a change of zone upon the aforementioned tract of
land, and
WHEREAS, Section 8 . 2 and 8. 3 of the Weld County Zoning
Resolution authorized the Board of County Commissioners to grant
a change of zone upon the showing by the petitioner of certain
facts , and
WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners heard all the
testimony and statements of those present, has studied the re-
770019
� [ G ) C11
BOOK 81.2 1733938
quest of the petitioner and the recommendations of the Weld
County Planning Commission, and having been fully informed and
satisfied that the request for rezoning complies with the Weld
County Comprehensive Plan and the conditions set out in Section 8. 2
and 8. 3 of the Weld County Zoning resolution;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Com-
missioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the petition of
Lovemont Investment Corporation for a change of zone from
"A" (Agricultural) to "C" (Commercial Unit Development) on the
above described tract of land, be, and hereby is, granted subject
to the Development Standards.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the reasons for
approval contained in the Planning Commission recommendations
dated July 5, 1977, be, and hereby are, incorporated as the
findings of fact of the Board of County Commissioners in this
matter.
The above and foregoing Resolution was , on motion duly made
and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 14th day of
September, A.D. , 1977.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Want COUNTY, COLO
ATTEST: Ly/
Weld County Clerk and Recorder
and iCierk to the Board
r
By K -t;,-,1 A ' "1_L)--
Deputy County rk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
L \
Asst. aunty Attorney
7
-2-
Date Presented : September 26 , 1977
Copies of Resolutions:
Granting COZ
Approval of Preliminary Plan
RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-3014 (plus postage)
SENT TO POSTMARK
Lovemorit Investment Corp OR DATE
Lo STREET AND NO.
6801 S. Yosemite Street I
CO
CO P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE
0 Englewood, Colorado 80110 9/27/77
OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES
RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date delivered 154 I
Cr RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only 654
2. Shows to whom,date and where delivered 354
SERVICES With delivery to addressee only 851
OELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY 504
O SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee requirwd)
Z PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side)
Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL -
R GPO 1974 O-551-454
1
I •SENDER: Cern OM I.S.and 4.
•x AJdTaKt Addrs t✓the 'flit;TO"spa on
M 1. The tonsuringas'it.a b requenad.(e kick rhos)
23 Show to whom and loth ie1IRlmid. -........ no
O Show to>*hea,date a adder 4[delfver#850
N. O RUT'UCTED DEY.IVERY, ``o' x Show to wham and date delivered.. ..........:h6Sd:.
O RESTRICTED DELIVERY.
Show to whose,date,and address of delivery Of
2. ARTICLE ADDRESSED TO: `61110010011r
pLovemont Investment Corp.
'z 6801 S. Yosemite Street
4re Englewood, Colo. 80110
pl 3. ARTICLE DES IPNOt@
REGISTERED NO- CERTIFIED NO. INSURED NO:
4 _s 640835
Mpg on ANSI at 4L MO ar N '
I�t I ban seabed the asrticle.daeribed those.
SIGNATURE O Addressee 0 Authorised slat.
X4 DM¢ OF Isom j �. 48'1
p5. ADDRESS (CwnRSAaNF N""Mai -1 „4.
g
`
6. UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE. ;
COZ 9/26177
*WO:tatFOMa4T
September 14, 1977
I hereby certify that pursuant to a notice dated August 10 , 1977 ,
duly published August 10, 1977 and August 31, 1977 in the Greeley
Journal, a public hearing was held on the request of the Lovemont
Investment Corporation for a Change of Zone from A-Agricultural
District to C-UD^Commercial Unit Development District. Raymond
Koernig of Land Aide Company representing Lovemont Investment
Corporation presented the request. No one in the audience had
an objection to the change of zone request. After all testimony
and evidence was received and reviewed by the Board, Commissioner
Dunbar made a motion to grant the change of zone from A-Agricultural
District to C-UD-Commercial Unit Development District. Commissioner
Roe seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. Commissioner
Carlson then made a motion to approve the preliminary plan of
Lovemont Investment Corporation. Commissioner Jacobucci seconded
the motion and it carried unanimously. All five Commissioners
were present at the meeting.
C RMAN
B RD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
ATTEST:
COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER
AND CLERK TO THE /BOARD
( /
7----Deputy Countx`CClerk
I 11
Tape No. 77-92 & 93
Docket No. 77-25
, /
can i. : Lovemont Investment Corp i n n ; 2; 00 PM
Hoe t:
Date : September 14, 1977 R"' uoKt ; COZ A to C & Preliminary77-25
Plan
NAT ADDRESS
Coo W, Ll7TCE7b./1)2 [3c)vl6V.a+cO�
- et . ' _ KoEaNn,-\ Li r-new car a A-
/Quo
g¢OO So . /lovescrrrn D .
r er -1-n e✓ G ..7514k,
)/
•
e' 1' -COtil^IY COD7I41SSIONEllS Greeley,
i°`I'-I L) COUNTY, C Colonel.)
COL ADO
August 10________— , ! 9 77
T'u}J.T1 ,1her :
Please insert the enclosed notice in jour issue t '1e week of
September_ 5y 1977 _ One time only.
the enclosed d voucher and tiniedo i l t ReDardi ❑y ray-n„ _
you .i r please us . When I c nrningef hc] ctc
i- include an aftidavit oI` publication so •.c ulay =
complete our tile ,; ,
Thank you for your cooperation.
Docket #77.25 Sincerely,
TIM IiO71ND OF CnrN j!Y CON:lISS1ONC:}:S
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
BY : Mary Ann I euers---ai❑
County Clerk and k?ccrcie;-
and Clerk to the Board '
13y. �J , /
Deputy ounLy Clerk
RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30c, (plus postage)
SENT TO POSTMARK
TIJNCa1ONT TIMES CALL, OR DATE
STREET AND NO. '
.rj- BOX 299 .R •J8ND8R: Caepiew(eeou L,z,and s. e
CD
P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE 8/10/77 R %r addnoa a the "RETVRI5i TO" apace on
LONE NT, CO 80501 3
�,�.� OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES Ollie following servkeio requested (check one). i
RETURN 1• Shoos to whom owl date tleliyentl 154 Show to whom and date delivered 15f 0
o
With delivery to addressee only 55!
N— RECEIPT 2. Shows to ahem,dot•and where del rod.. 35! :Isom to w6�,date,&address of delivery.. 350
1 cr.
SERVICES With delivery to addressee only... 85` s
_ DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ... SO4 N r RESTRICTED nd date deli a
• Z Q SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra be required)
Show Yo Wholmand date delivered 650 1
PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (So other Se)
RESTRICTED DELIVERY.
Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL Q OpO:IB91 O-553451
Show GO Whom,date,and address of delivery 85f t
r. '�r.M`� '" 'C°'"�FTre,.,,, -aS„ 4t..�pT(API APIA 1
/ e•'b'u a� i-�w'rx•w•-•e..m a,lReTtC�E' . •. . .., M:
ra r"'i "Ir' ', � LP TIMES CALL
•� :BOX 299
00 8n5n1
1 ;�.L, yt .. !,y ICLE DESCRIPTION:
�
�gn„rc + ,
-.1J .:3 r ! _ 1*OISTERED:NO. CERTIFIED NO. INSURED NO.
, a' 3,76pQd
always cabin signature of nemeses or again)
I'have received the article described.above.
SIGNATURE ❑ Addressee �w❑wADthorized agent
it
r
_.IatA+ POSTMARK
I
.__� DDa ;ADDRESS (Comple•only IS l
R
=' 6 UNABLE TO DELIVER BE C K'S
p TIALS
..- DQC
77-25 {r GPo,IB,5-—5W047
NITICE
Pursuant to the zoning laws of the Stole of Colorado and the Weld County Land
Use Code, a public hearing will he held in rho Chambers of the. Board of County
Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th
Street, Greeley, Colorado, at the time specified . All. persons in any manner
. interested in the following proposed Change of Zone arc requested to attend
and may be heard.
BE IT ALSO KNOWN that the text and maps so certified by the County Planning
Commission may be examined in the Office of the Clerk to the Board of the
County Commissioners, located in the Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th
Street, Third Floor, Greeley, Colorado.
Docket No. 77-25 Lovemont Investment Corporation
6801 S. Yosemite Street
Englewood, Colorado 80110
Date: September 14, 1977
Time: 2:00 P.M.
Request: Change of Zone fran A-Agricultural District to C_-Commercial
Unit Development District and a Preliminary Plan - Farmer's Mart
LOCATION; Approximately two miles southeast of Mead, Colorado..
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
BY: MARY ANN FFUERSTFIN
COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER
AND CLERK TO TEE BOARD
BY: Rita Jo Kummer, Deputy
•
•
Dated: August 10,1977
at
M..WNd It
troll at the N14 Cann rla of s
Noah
net of YI. S�icticti S M an
s5 OQ Zub‘.With
hBall
�thih .
Pato t!u' C feet
aaI roLine oof Colorado State I�
lc 7$the p is mince South 8i'4S'in"
. th BONN of •of feet the South„__ tr
d lcM pp1nt Beg et said to ms T
89'2800"West, n feet'
at,thee South Rlphwf-t4/sy this S saU
in any eat way 68 toe point on U6
leitmotiv line of U.B. 1polntetetete Ti ;
of Zone remand South ✓5'5842" West
be al said Interstate No, 25• Thence
AL00 that the text trcoao" west te8d.B0 feet
e
man p W by CMK ounty - W26'S0' Westtate x.433 feet
n
yr to_the'alpq said Interstate No, 25; Thence
the ty�lnloaa'e North 89'2510' East 132584 f
ant tai county nisi Thence Nor h 00'13'00" East 1279
815 101 Street, Third Floor, feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGI .
N NO containing 35.o acres, more a
l,dseraonntor l�
Corporation THE. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMIS
880f S.Y at reet SIGNERS
ado 80110 WELD COUNTY COLpRqpDO
kotertranwar 14,1877' BY:MARY ANN PEUER8TEIN
Thee P. COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER .
of Zone from ANDCLERKTOTHEBOARD
lotulturtl rlet to C-Comma- BY:Rita Jo Kummer,Deputy
U t District end a DATED:August
110,1977u0
aria's Mart. Published A The Greeley J ntl
t,E' : ON:. . Published In . . .
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
LONGMONT DAILY TIMES-CALL
State of Colorado )
County of Boulder ) SS
1, Dan H. Shrader do NOTICE
Pursolemnly swear that the LONGMONT DAILY TIMES-CALL is a State sua nt i
of colradd o the land ng a the ws weldthd
lastic
daily newspaper printed, in whole or in part, and published in Cavity
will be held in nd Ute Code,Chambers
the City of Longmont, County of Boulder, State of Colorado, ion sBof ward r County, Com,
of the of Cel°2oun County,Colorado,
and which has general circulation therein and in parts of Boulder Weld County Centennial Center, 915
10th Street,Greeley,Colorado,at the
and Weld Counties; that said newspaper has been continuously time specified. All persons in any
manner In tsled in the following
and uninterruptedly published for a period of more than six months proposed`Change of zone are
requested to attend and may be
next prior to the first publication of the annexed legal notice heard.
BE IT ALSO KNOWN that the text
of advertisement, that said newspaper has been admitted to the and maps,so certified by the County
Planning Commission May \be
United States mails as second-class matter under the provisions examined in the Office of the Clerk to
of the Act of March 3, 1879, or any amendments thereof, and the one's of and InC the hy cold
Comiunty Centennial
located Center, Weld
that said newspaper is a daily newspaper duly qualified for publishing Street, C hird lalFl , Greeley
legal notices and advertisements within the meaning of the laws Clorado.
Co Dockett 77-ss
of the State of Colorado; that copies of each number of said
Lovemont Investment Cor-
newspaper, in which said notice or advertisement was published, poration,6801S.Yosemite Street,
Englewood, Colorado 80110`
were transmitted by mail or carrier to each of the subscribers Date: September td, 1977
Time:of said newspaper, according to the accustomed mode of business Request:
D P.M.
in this office. - Change of zone from A.
AgriculturalDistrict to C.
That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was published Commercial Unit Development
District and a Preliminary Plan
—Farmers Mart
in the regular and entire editions of said daily newspaper>51l36YeYc& LOCATION: Approximately two
miles southeast of Mead, Colored°.
THE BOARD OF COUNTY
woekx>xktgemot otavxOC*X tiX* JX for the period oro n e (1 COMMISSIONERS
OL
I BY:MARY
7FEUER TEIN
CLERK N F RECORDER
EIR
COUNANDCLERK TO THE BOARD
ANDCLERKTOYNE BOARD
consecutive insertions; and that the first publication of said notice By: Rita Jo Kummer, Deputy
Dated: August 10, 1977
Published in the Deily Times-Call,
was in the issue of said newspaper dated September 5 Longmont,Colo. Sept.", 1977.
19 77 and that the last publication of said notice was in
the issue of said newspaper dated September 5 197 7
In witness whereof I have hereunto set my hand this 5th
day of S-e{lt-enl-ber , 197.7LLA\.. Ai1/4_, L
Business Manager
Subscribed and sworn to before me this..5.t-h day of
September 19 77
My Commission Expires /.e2t-z iteo 2c≤ J„!ZY
x1 c) � d
Notary Public
FEE $ 10. 27
1-1300-02
NOTICE
Pursuant to the zoning laws of the State of Colorado and the Weld County Land
Use Code, a public hearing will be held in the Chambers of the Board of County
Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th
Street, Greeley, Colorado, at the time specified. All persons in any manner
interested in the following proposed Change of Zone are requested to attend
and may be heard.
BE IT ALSO KNOWN that the text and maps so certified by the County Planning
Commission may he examined in the Office of the Clerk to the Board of the
County Commissioners, located in the Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th
Street, Third Floor, Greeley, Colorado.
Docket No. 77-25 Lovemont Investment Corporation
6801 S. Yosemite Street
Englewood, Colorado 80110
Date: September 14, 1977
Time: 2:00 P.M.
Request: Change of Zone fran A-Agricultural District to C-Commercial
Unit Develoianent District and a Preliminary Plan - Farmer's Mart
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Part of the NWa of Section 26, Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. ,
Weld County, Colorado, being more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the NQ Corner of said Section 26, and considering the North line of
said Section 26 as bring South 89°25'00" West, with all other bearings contained
herein relative thereto;
Thence South 00°13'00" West, 40.00 feet to a point on the South Right-of-Way
Line of Colorado State Highway 66;
Thence South 89°25'00" West, 1270.76 feet along the South Right-of-Way of said
Highway 66 to the True Point of Beginning:
Thence South 89°25'00" West, 530.18 feet along the South Right-of-Way line of said
Highway 66 to a point on the Right-of-Way line of U.S. Interstate No. 25;
Thence South 85°59'42" West 499.81 feet along said Interstate No. 25;
Thence South 16°00'00" West 1088.80 feet along said Interstate No. 25;
Thence South 00°25'30" West 206.43 feet along said Interstate No. 25;
Thence North 89°25'10" East 1325.64 feet;
Thence North 00°13'00" East 1279.94 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING
containing 35.0 acres, more or less.
THE BOARD OF COUNTY CCt41ISSIONERS
WELD CGUBTSY, COLORADO
BY: MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN
COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER
AND CLERK TO THE BOARD
BY: Rita Jo Kunner, Deputy
DATED: August 10, 1977
PUBLISHED: August 10, 1977 and August 31, 1977 in the Greeley Journal
pals;Seotem.M.14. 1977 N1 1oet nettax�m9 36.81 aCreaF more for
Time:it P yMgp of Zone from less:. COUNTY COMMIS-
A ,µyltlpal pytrkl to CrComnbr' THE-BOARD OF SIpNERS
barc1a1. nit�l Orstrkl and a We,,DCOUNTY COLORADO
im1,,,,y Farmer's Mart. COINiTV pqY ANN�EUER$TEIN
LEnit °I t"11PT10N: ANDRECORDER
part d the N. R of Section dO p iJo TO THE BOARD
TownMd�3 North. Range BB Weal of BY: , aJo Kummer.Deputy
the 817 F M..Weld County.Camu DATED: Aug, 78 d A
baln0 !Korb prlfoulrly deacrl Published� ipaa,}8l�1Au& 1977
Sang
laws of the folin M lk al d cone!Ns aa.ell Garner N9aath n The fwna�
cows*eM enarItd cou t slot WStIon 26m aria bar-. --
ade
__
C Canna Here n ra of cMa�
1001711 �M �' tth 80'13'80" Weal -
fr'm. point on the South Rr9K
tem. Une of Colorado Stele Hbbw+y
M thEi' fit` .South 89'25'00 West.
tied. 8 • a'H- .>hMdr imdb wet along the South Right-ot-
e tad n weir Way 4t yyd'H way 6 to
t South
of pow of BWeginein 18 feel Thence S the
lent Ih`aiight of-esfey One of aaW Hl9h-
�ys F.nunly 86 to r lxma on the Right-al-VV
line of U.S. Inlerelale No 5: Thence
der n ...yoyuolt1ph 85"59'42 Wean 499.81 lane
AOR0.1 . tale.Spalh a1r9a80'00 au West 1 25i T.�afeet
Ot A Flaw. 30" West 20625:3h nce
ett
DatlfOf. �l9o.yael� 1y3�JS'�1 4aK:'.
18
''"` Sx a ...Feu 127194
DATE: Augus' 5, 1977
TO: The Board of County Commissioners
Weld County, Colorado
FROM: Clerk to the Board Office
•
Commissioners:
If you have no objections, we have tentatively set the
following hearing for the 14th of September, 1977 at 2:00 P.M. for
Loveuunt Investment Corporation
6801 S. Yosemite Street
Englewood, Colorado 80110
for a Change of Zone fran A-Agricultural District to C-Ccnnercial Unit Development
and Preliminary Plan - Farmer's Mart
OFFICE F THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
BY: 'uty
The above mentioned hearing date and hearing time may be scheduled
on the agenda as stated above.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
� I
�w
BEFORE TF JELD COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNING MMISSION
RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Date July 5, 1977 Case No. Z# 286 :77:4
APPLICATION OF Lovemont Investment Corporation
ADDRESS 6801 S. Yosemite Street, Englewood, Colorado 80110
Moved by Percy Hiatt that the following resolution be introduced
for passage by the Weld County Planning Commission:
Be it Resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the appli-
cation for rezoning from A ( Agricultural District) to
C (Commercial: nit Dev District) covering the.following described
property in Weld Cty, Colorado, to-wit:
be recommend (favorably) (t Iidn%ZXjj ) to the Board of County Commissioners
for the following reasons:
1. It is the opinion of the Planning Commission that the applicant has
complied with Section 8,3 of the Weld County Zoning Resolution which
states:
"Request for rezoning of tracts within Weld County should be
supported by detailed and substantial evidence that such rezoning
is necessary. Recent findings and oral statements by petitioners
should show very clearly that either the original zoning was
faulty or that changing conditions in the area now justify a new
classification. Without the presentation of such supporting
documentation, the Planning Commission should not recommend a
change of zoning, "
It is the opinion of the Planning Commission that the applicant has
demonstrated that changing conditions in the area now justify a new
zoning classification,
Motion seconded by: Bette Koiu tz
Vote: For Passage Percy Hiatt Against Passage
Ben Nix
Chuck Carlson
Harry Ashley
Bette Kountz
Irma White
The Chairman declared the Resolution passed and ordered thatacertified copy be for-
warded with the file of this case to the Board of County Commissioners for further
proceedings.
CERTIFICATION OF COPY
I, Shirley A. Phillips , Recording Secretary of the Weld County Planning
Commission, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution is a true
copy of the Resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County, Colorado, adopted
on July 5, 1977 and recorded in Book No. V of the proceedings cF
the said Planning Commission.
Dated the 13 day of July , 1977 .
C0UNN of WELD as. Secretary
yj ,_‘��`,'Cl/s
Filed with the Clerk of the Board Secr C '
of County Commissioners
AIM 51277
9.
COU 1 RX AND FECDDDFN
Lex _Deputy_
•
f G /1
. ,a ° cre dE
:pd 1 1r.. = r�.ir re 3 _' VE -erFe• ,
toe +�
r.
o - - 1227 . 'r -f, e - ,Thar Le 22 t r c
]-
5— crc E3lt,
�., r ' ,,3 / 1 r .c .
� r�- .. 1 . .3y -.. - -
r t ..
O . Nest d - _ c r rst
ate
r�_r, ., ,�:tr — _ > tprt - _
Lovemont Investment corporation
Z- 286 : 77 :4
P.C. Resolution
July 5, 1977
Additionally Section 8. 3 states, "There must be definite proof that the
area requested for change has unique characteristics which distinguish
it from surrounding lands and thus make its rezoning essential. " Again
it is the opinion of the Planning Commission that the applicant has
demonstrated that the property in question has physical limitations
which distinguishes it from surrounding productive agricultural lands.
This assertion is substantiated by the Soil Conservation Service who
indicated:
"The soils are classified as Weld loam, Kim loam, and Wiley-Colby
complex found on a 1-5% slope. This has an irrigated capability
of Class II and III . The soils, however, have a fluctuating water
table due to poor surface drainage. The area is bounded by
seepy irrigation canals and in general, does not produce well. "
They concluded by indicating,
" . • . due to its relative small size, its present low productivity
and the compatability with the adjoining property, we would have
no objection to the zoning change and proposed use. "
2. The rezoning request complies with the policies contained in the
Weld County Comprehensive Plan relating to commercial development .
The policy utilized to guide commercial development of this nature
states :
"Commercial development designed to serve the agricultural base of
the county should be located wherever practical within a
municipality; however, whenever distance from the municipality makes
this an impractical or unprofitable establishment of such commercial
service, facilities within easy access to each agricultural area will
be encouraged. "
It is the opinion of the Planning Commission that the applicant
has demonstrated that it is impractical to locate the proposed agri-
business center catering to the needs of area farmers and ranchers within
an existing municipality.
H.UZCNING AI PPLICATIg
Weld County Planning Department Services Building, Greeley, Colo.
--
f OR PLANNING DEPA2tMNT USE ONLY: CASE NUMBER:
PC HEARING DATE: .
SEC: TWP RANGE: CC HEARING DATE: _
LAND CODE:
T: .S: 1/4: KEY:
SUB/DIV CODE:
SUB: ELK: µOT: KEY:
IfsFER T0: REZONING F :F: -
Date: APP. MCKED BY: 6 /77
2) Date: ____---._ REC. NO. :
sq- Fr
3) Pte: • ^ �____�_ LEGAL DEC. APPROVAL
4) Mite: ...... ... ' , / `_.
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT TN ACCORDANCE WITH PROCEDURAL GUIDE REQUIREMENTS: Print or
type only, except for necessary signatures.
7/(we), the undersigned, hereby- regunet a tiering ;:afore the Weld County Planning
Commission concerning proposed rezoning of the following deucribed unincorporated area
of Weld County: LEGAL DESCRIPTION;
Part of the Northwest Quarter (NWk ) of Section 26, Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the
6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado, being more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the North Quarter Corner (N4 Cor) of said Section 26, and considering the North
line of said Section 26, as bearing South 89° 25'00" West, with all other bearings containec
herein relative thereto; Thence South 00°13'00" West, 40.00 feet to a point on the South RIN
line of Colorado State Highway 66; Thence South 89°25'00" West, 1,270.76 feet along the
South ROW line of said Highway 66 to the True Point of Beginning; Thence continuing South
89025'00" West, 530.18 feet along the South ROW line of said Highway 66 to a point on the
ROW line of U.S. Interstate No. 25; Thence South 85°59'42" West 499.81 feet along said
Interstate No. 25; Thence South 16°00'00" West, 1,088.80 feet along said Interstate No. 25;
Thence South 00°25' 30" West 206.43 feet along said Interstate No. 25; Thence North
89°25' 10" East 1,325.64 feet; Thence North 00°13'00" East, 1,279.94 feet to the True Point
of Beginning. •
(If additional space is reZu:ired, afitrOA r.% additional sheet of this same size) .
STREET LOCATION: SE C,S1Me.r o.LS.td.te.lii 1.Tway..Nn.—b6-axad._.Lp-ters-ta-t-e--
PRESENT ZONE A-1 P,t(.CO ,L,1} cad:1. c_._(.au.111__.-....___ ROJX'ARM: 3.5 asres_
PU,tPOSt ; AgribusjrleS.s C.en.;..e.C t J9.e...known.A..$..4.r.wers'_. .a.rt �,
_.�, .__.
IS THIS.AREA PLATTED: YES( I 'fir'`. ) , y £ '' ILATV::1), NA OF PLAT: _ -
IS THIS AREA TO BE PLATTED; Y '; 4,(X) LO ! ) !T' NS;.:::.. . IS Y:.-C, HA;> PLAT BEM SUBMITTED:
YES ( ) NO ( ). (Sketch plan to be submitted with this application) .
FEE OWNERS OF AREA PROPOSED FOR Rnt7;''- fik.
tip "� 6801 S. Yosemite Street, T1-71 771-8500
NAME: Lovemont Investment Company, ,.�I?F :
.___. . _.._ .._...- Ant -f. ,S. "EngI eW d TUTOFF-6513iTiNTEL:
NAME: '_..N.1...E.iu ----- TET'.
I hereby depose and state under the po`'.n.at.ies of perj‘:ry that all statements, proposals
and/or plans submitted with or ook.. i •:ed -. tin this a.nlication are true and correct to
the best of my knowledge. I further affirm that Lovemont Investment Company is the o,�ner of
the subject property, and that I , Ralph D. Kaufman 'ts General Pa tner am .uthor'zfJ/to make
this application for rezoning .
COUI.:TY OF WIID
STATE OF COLORADO .) �� r /
Signature: (Ynar or Authori?ed Agent
_..,_
Sub9c:'ied and sworn to before me t,11:fit' .......&441, dry. • of „f'tO12U , 19:12.-.
k: '
SEAL . -\/.. _ A . (_1:�er—.
. NOTA' Y PUBLIC
My commission expires: A4/101 4_.i r lL,1.J... ..,.........
Y
Lenda''de 303-794-3972
609 West Littleton Boulevard Littleton Colorado 80120
Inc.
Weld County Planning Department,
Greeley, Colorado, 80631
ATTN: Mr. Thomas E. Honn, Zoning Adminstrator
Dear Mr. Honn, June 1, 1977
Transmitted herewith is the application of Lovement Investment Company for
the rezoning of thirty-five acres of land on the Southeast corner of State
Highway 66 and Interstate 25 from A-1 (Agriculture) to C (Commercial PUD) .
The proposed development is known as The Farmers' Mart and is designed as an
agribusiness center catering to the needs of area farmers and ranchers. Also
included with the rezoning request is a check in the amount of $275.00 for
processing of the planned unit development plan and preliminary plat. Fifteen
(15) copies of the Preliminary PUD Plan, and all information on the plan is
applicable to the Preliminary Plat. Required soils reports were filed with
Weld County when the sketch plan was transmitted to you for comment on
February 16, 1977. We have reviewed your comments in the letter from your
office dated March 11, 1977, and all objective requests have been included
in the enclosed plan. Where we disagree with you on subjective matters we
will be pleased to discuss our differences with the Planning Commission at
the time of presentation. Also included are a utilities sign-off sheet,
list of addresses of neighboring landowners, a current treasurer's certificate
and the application form for a preliminary plat.
In your procedural outline for rezoning cases, you put forth eight questions
pertaining to the proposed rezoning. These eight questions are answered as
follows:
1. Is it impractical, impossible, or undesireable to develop the land according
to is current zoning classification? The property has a fairly high water
table and poor permeability as discussed in the soils report. In addition,
the soil is alkaline and row crops do not do well in it. The property is
bounded on the east by the Sekich Deere agency, and the westerly portion
of the south boundary contains a private residence. With the irrigation
canal along the north and west, the property is difficult to farm and of
marginal agricultural value. It is not large enough to accept more than
two cow-calf units and obviously too small to farm profitably in dry land
crops. Therefore we would contend that the property is impractical to be
put to use as an agricultural property.
2. Would the proposed rezoning benefit the entire County by allowing a typical
development which is needed and cannot locate in other parts of the County?
The entire county would benefit by virtue of the increased assessment base
of the commercial use over the agricultural use which the property now has.
More significantly, with the need to conserve energy Farmers' Mart will
provide a convenient business center for area farmers and ranchers and will
help preclude their driving long distances to obtain agriculturally minted
products and services such as will be avaialbel at Farmers Mart.
-1-
3. Would the proposed rezoning benefit lands adjoining the area requesting
the change? The property to the north is a large, working farm. Rezoning
of the subject property would not affect that property, and would not
serve as any precedent for rezoning of it for uses other than agriculture.
The low intensity uses proposed for the southern quarter of the property
would not affect the Rademacher home or farm, and landscaping will be
provided for their benefit along the south boundary of the property.
Rezoning will probably be beneficial to the Sekich property to the east
in that additional business will tend to generate new customers for the
Deere agency and cafe. We do not feel that the proposed rezoning is of
great enough significance from a land use basis as to serve as the
catalyst for rezoning requests from adjacent property owners.
4. What features apply to the property requesting rezoning which make it
illogical to rezone this tract and not to rezone in a similar manner
surrounding properties which may have like land use characteristics?
Properties to the west are buffered from the subject property by
Interstate Highway 25, and have no characteristics similar to the sub-
ject property. As mentioned above, the property to the north is a
working farm also without the same physical properties or limitations
of the subject property. To the south along the frontage road is a
single family home recently built by the Rademachers which effectively
serves as a barrier to further commercial usage to the south. To the
east the property is bordered entirely by zoned commercial land.
5. Why are other areas in the County already zoned according to the requested
classification unsuitable for the development which is proposed? There
may be other areas in the county suitable for the agribusiness center
proposed as Farmers' Mart. Lovemont Investment Company, however, feels
that the subject property is located very well for such agribusiness
and that the location enhances the probability of success for the property
to serve the farmers and ranchers of the area. It is always difficult to
attempt to say why other properties have not developed - the reasons range
from inability to obtain financing or to obtain utilities through a lack
of imagination or desire on the part of the owners. Lovemont Investment
Company is capable of and prepared to develop the subject property in a
responsible and pleasant manner.
6. What proof of evidence is available that the original zoning is faulty or
that changing conditions in the area justify rezoning at this time? With
the developed Sekich property to the east and the Rademacher home to the
south, the elder Rademachers who sold the property to Lovemont Investment
Company no doubt found the property difficult to farm, and economically
unfeasible to farm. The property had been cut into with the interstate
off-ramp and frontage road and the elevated irrigation ditch on the
north and west, along with irrigation canals across it. Aside from the
difficulty of farming the property, it is alkaline and a low yield pro
ducer and should probably not have been zoned agriculture in the first
place. Development of the Sekich property and the Rademacher home have
effectively blocked this property from expanding into enough size to
become a working farm, and these changed conditions in the neighborhood
have limited the viability of this property to be an effective agricultural
producer, and therefore the property can be put to more productive use if
developed in accordance with the plan submitted for Farmers' Mart.
7. Please submit economic or other evidence that the area covered in the pet-
ition needs additional commercial or business in the area. Lovemont
Investment Company has had several requests from agriculturally related
business during the past two years for business locations at the subject
property. They have admittedly been prospecting for such businesses, and
the response has been very good. The design standards for Farmers' Mart
have been based upon potential user requests. Users will be firmed up
when the rezoning and subdivision issues have been resolved. Even more
significantly, however, the owners recognize that if a property is rezoned
in Weld County and does not develop, the County Commissioners can move to
rezone it after a six months (plus extensions) period of time. Lovemont
Investment Company is prepared to invest a large amount of money in the
development of this property, and their committment to such development is
a major economic reason in support of its validity as a commercial site.
8. Give some evidence of the proposed business or commercial enterprises
that are to locate in the requested area and a tentative time schedule
for construction. We cannot disclose absolute users at this time, but
all users will have to conform to the PUD requirements as described in
the Farmers' Mart preliminary plan. Development of the road system and
water lines will begin no later than six months from the approval and
recording of the final plat. The final plat and plan will be submitted
as soon as is reasonably possible after approval of the rezoning and
preliminary plan.
We feel that the energy crisis must bring about a rethinking of many planning
ideas. There has admittedly been a time when "regional" centers were desireable
as the business centers of a community. Regional centers, however, are entirely
automobile oriented and nobody cared how far one had to drive to get to them.
With new demands on energy, modern planners are again thinking of neighborhood
or community centers - smaller and more convenient for area residents. We also
think of land conservation, and feel that poor agricultural ground should be
used in a manner that makes sense and not just left as non-producing land
because it is convenient to do so. We can see no agricultural future for this
piece of ground, and feel it is in the best interests of the County, the owner
and area residents that the property be developed in a controlled manner as
indicated in the Farmers Mart planned unit development.
We request that the appropriate reviews be made as soon as is reasonably pos-
sible, and that we may appear before the Planning Commission in the near
future with our request. I will be happy to answer any questions you might
have, or provide additional information.
Sincerely,
Landayide, Inc. ,
Raymond C. Koerni J
President
-3-
./
N
3972
I.. aiiciaici€ 303-794-
609 West Littleton Boulevard Littleton Colorado 80120 Inc.
June 1, 1977
FARMERS' MART — PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY SHEET
LOCATION: Southeast corner of the intersection of Interstate Highway No. 25
and State Highway 66.
SIZE: 35 acres
PROPOSED USAGE: Commercial center for agriculture related businesses. The
proposed development is designed to serve the needs of area farmers
and ranchers. It is not intended to serve tourist or pass through
customers.
ALLOCATION OF LAND: 29.5 acres in eleven (11) lots ranging in size from 0.6 acres
to 6.0 acres. 5.5 acres are in dedicated rights of way. All roads
will be developed to County standards and will be dedicated, public
roads.
ACCESS: Single access at south end of property from I-25 frontage road;
Single access with frontage road on east end of property from
State Highway 66.
WATER SERVICE: Provided through Little Thompson Supply District.
SEWERAGE: Engineered septic systems designed and built in accordance with
County standards.
STORM DRAINAGE: Retention on site of storm drainage, with release to adjoining
properties no greater than normal runoff of the undeveloped land.
GAS: Propane provided by users.
ELECTRICITY: Union Rural Electric Company (all underground power)
TELEPHONE: Mountain Bell (all underground wiring)
LOT COVERAGE: Maximum of 35% in primary building; up to 20% in accessory buildings;
Minimum of 5% or 5,000 square feet (whichever is larger) in landscaped,
unobstructed open space.
PARKING: Retail space: One space for each 250 SF of retail space plus one space
for each two employees.
Service or Repair shop: One space for each 600 square feet of gross
floor area plus one space for each two employees.
Medical, dental and veterinary offices and clinics: One space for each
300 square feet of gross floor area plus one space for
each two employees.
Parking spaces are nominally figured at 9' x 20'
INTERIOR LIGHTING: Will be shown on individual site plans for users as a requirement
of their building permit application. Such lighting will be designed to
minimize glare.
STORAGE OF MATERIALS: All outdoor storage facilities for fuel, raw materials,
equipment and products shall be enclosed by a fence or wall adequate to
conceal such facilities from adjacent properties. No materials or wastes
shall be deposited upon a lot in such form or manner that they may be
moved off the lot by natural causes or forces.
See the Development Standards of the PUD Plan for more details.
/
303-794-3972
Lan aide
609 West Littleton Boulevard Littleton Colorado 8001212 0
Inc.
Weld County Planning Department, June 1, 1977
Greeley, Colorado, 80631
ATTN: Mr. Tom Bonn, Zoning Administrator
NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF OWNERS OF PROPERTY ABUTTING THE PROPOSED FARMERS' MART
DEVELOPMENT AT HIGHWAY 66 AND INTERSTATE 25.
The location of property owners is shown on the Preliminary Development Plan-
Properties directly abutting the subject property:
25608-B Frederick M. and Donna L. Sekich,
Nicholas J. and Karen S. Sekich, Jr. ,
P.O. Box 508, Longmont, Colorado, 80501
25608-C Theo. and Elizabeth Rademacher
and Rt. 1, Box 293,
25608 Longmont, Colorado, 80501
25608-D Robert M. and Janice M. Rademacher,
Rt. 1, Box 261,
Longmont, Colorado, 80501
Property north of the subject property (on the north side of Highway 66) :
25593 Valley 66, c/o Colorado-Chicago Partners,
18th Floor, Civics Tower Building, ATTN: William Arnold,
32 Randolph Street, Chicago, Illinois, 60604
Property west of the subject property (west of I-25)
25609 Valley 66 (see above for address)
25585 Donald C. Hilgers,
436 West Main Street,
Barrington, Illinois, 60010
,/
CLF LRi f , 2,ddC2D
FOR SUBDIV_SIi_i3 .' ' 1 03?1 ,OIL': PARKS
nr Ail by the ouol, v, dn� or Cin
�� record �1. b , io�t . Wolf) Coti�.,
The 0 4l O' i l C l e r . �. �Or� � ,' i , on RO-
ntl e a; r ''iirod in Sootion V of the t'ie County nt > - ✓ ..
reore .;lt. �
gula tio'ls.
NAME OF SUBDIVIDER OR D CV 3i,op E;R (-0if( 177on'7 7,/t/YES /m-£/v7 ._607/7117
Kane of S.tbd i di.s:i.o-n Eft-r<'(Y1E72S in _7
a;e t / Owner L W y p_(Au m(J-j✓! _40.. ‘01q7776,1./-7- 9-A!Itf 5 ilYlf(1,u_ 6 .
i n,re n, Ad doe 6O/ I_ AD/IV ri;- S//f_fF i/._EA6( CT1.!Ch» C t ig-O) [o i1`'
IU' f -2Y.,,F...' -;i) OT' op To di (to .ee si ; led by . City CffL7i _1 1. if in
within the iu isdint;_oz of such)
Annrourui by . ---- --- - ' --
1 _..H ) ( , t )
NSLl 1 ,ct to
D-i.na rovoc'. 7;i _ C _
r
/ t �' aL o'3- 7/
limn ( iii.; .e ) �� f( l ) 1
t
5 III),,,o;. ,,o :}1.0 t 1I4 - ,..l,t, _- CLi�e�t?EL Ca pt-: i'-.t,ct.td.'�--) . C7 21C_[sv2-�aatr..r1
td 4fks-r>zrzt. LLflo6 Cj i7
. 0 z_e) ' ' Vin: -- __ . . _ -) -
y!y /%'"r1-, ti L��_-�L�fr2ri=��l"?161''-� _..__ . _ _ . //`c ,
9
:;-.t'i i -. ':'� �/J� ._�1'LCL/tAliF��,1,IL'.i(.1i121..<j �/Z:LLCWJ L�LC JIJ�/rirPi'..tl''.2(.^GGI If 4j lcC.- -t✓7t!)CFi�
SEWER
Approved by
. (Name) Title) (Date)
N/f)r- Subject to:
Disapproved by _ _
rName ) (Title" T5a.teT •
TELEPHONE COMPANY
n 1 t l ,�
Approved by ;'1I a `�K-h C �)r' I IBC i � ��_.��:r.�.l^, 1? '" 11' ___
rilame) Tide) ---1---
Date)
,
:
Subject to:
Disapproved by _ _ _._._____ _.._�_. i --------
Tharnej -T2it1 ) (gate
GAS COMPANY
. Approved by __._-_�_.—_______.._ ___.___ ,----_-.__ ._
TNan �-} 1Tit1e7 tiff^tei
K1 Subject to :
Disapproved. by _ _ -- (� -___. ___...__..__..:_.___. _-- -•- --. _____._
ifa-ri r)--(1iTti e 1 •7 D-a--t e-
PLA':•INT.EIG ADMINISTRATOR .
Approved. by
Subject to :
Di.saporo'red by _ —. ._-------
/
01'7 434)11,Odt
RICHARD O LAMM `) ) I .:OIIN W. BOLD
GOVERNOR Director
COLORADO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES �" )1.'1314,
715 STATE CEN FE NNIAI_ BUR_DING 1313 SHERMAN 1)1111[ET \E
DENVER COLORADO "0203 PRONE 1303) 92--2611 ' � �,
� ' JUN 19 '
RECEIVEi_; 1
June 28, 1977 1,Y; wab awry
`, b1ain( Costcissien �J
Department of Planning Services , Z\�w�1
Weld County Centennial Center S1b«�
915 10th Street
Greeley, CO 80631
Gentlemen: RE: LOVEMONT INVESTMENT CO/
FARMERS MART/RT 66 AND I-25
We have reviewed the available geologic information on this site and
find that the geologic conditions and the proposed project are com-
patible. We have no objection to approval of this preliminary plat or
zone change.
Sincerely,
L. R. Ladwig
Engineering Geologist
LRL/ds
GEOLOGY
STORY OI 11-IF PAST . . . KEY TO [HE FIIIURE J
AGRR.ULTURE COUNCIL OF WELL, BOUNTY
"Progress Through Unity"
7
121_ ...E,.&,� (4'4.-c;
4'4.-c % , .
n
)� C ILL � 7 V / Y7
NATIONAL
FARMERS ORGANIZATION
N
F COLLECTIVE
O BARGAINING d `
iJ Jr?:._ CE (1.-:„. Ca,2(.. 1 LC.,c J.'i-1.2,.t-<-r„
led/1-11,c-L,
E
Q Rocky Mountain ".�,1 !l C� l '
Farmers Union l r L1 it,'.-.: I; / �.. :_. �..[,.C,,,_ r ca_.
I-:-C Cul .,1, '
WELD COUNTY
FARM BUREAU
ar'aouoo j' n r 1
•
�:�F F,•' /.I L( l f• . CC.-Lt i2.c.<,-E- t✓,<,z- F ,LL S.
c,„�'
A-c /
WELD COUNTY -
LIVESTOCK ASSOCIATION L rr-_ ( C .' )) t,' fit r-C -1'''l t-" ( I "1-"i_ ! (, C.( tt_,
(.I
L L c. 1_
WELD COUNTY ....1'_
'� /
TAXPAYERS' 1SSOCIAIION 1 -II
+...,*y C `,� c�_�,�e.J
V r''rmu.fk..V r '
/)le r-- c` (y. C. tL C L.., 6 c- ..L '�., c- ,--1_
_ .f
99 _3 C
/ r I f , i /
r
. 5%
WELL) COUNTY COLORADO
M ��
For Action To Planning Commission June 27 , 1977
C For Info To _ Your Action Or Reply Is Required
Lovemont Investment Company
Subject: �n Or Before
Preliminary Plat and—Change b Zone
Engineering comments on the Lovemont Investment Company .
are as follows :
1 . Irrigation ditch along west side of property appears
to cross proposed street . How will this be handled?
Who will maintain? Also dedication on north side
should be more clearly described.
2. The developers shall submit detailed engineering plans
to the County Engineer including historical runoff ,
developed runoff , retention pond details , method of
discharge and other information as required for review.
The developer shall also include the method of maintenance
for the retention pond after the development is completed.
3 . A complete typical road cross section showing slopes
shall be submitted. Minimum base shall be 6" and
subbase thickness to be determined by field test .
4. The cul-de-sac roadway radius shall be 65 ' minimum.
5. All ingress and egress to proposed project shall be
from State Highways .
6 . Is the 30 ' dedication on the East side of proposal
necessary . Does the Sekich property have a like dedication?
Gilman E . Olson
Subdivision Director
mfm
BOARD OF HEALTH •
Weld County I tealth Deparirnetit DAVID WINKING Air≥. Gr.,
ERANKI.IN D YODER MI), MPH IIAI PH MD, (4r miry
Dneclor !`Il) IIO;:PIIAI ROAD WILLIAM HICK Rrnylr'H
GREELEV. COLORADO 00631 now. DII I RI Ire"'"v
IIONAI D 11111O4 III Wrorc:or
(3031'S T O540 ANNETTE M LOPEZ. Greeley
HERSCIIEL PHELPS,JR M D
Greeley
KATHLEEN SI LAUGHNESSV. Ault
.—K. JOE STOCKTON. Gllcre5t
June 27, 1977icN
�^ JUN 1977 F
Mr. Gary Fortner, Director RECEIVED c,`
Planning Commission W611 Cant? '4
915-10th Street : N'°"F"q Co"ui3t CC
Greeley, CO 80631 e
`S5Gltil•
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
The consulting engineers of Chen and Associates , Inc. are not
recommending individual sewage disposal systems. We do not
have jurisdiction over anything larger than a 2,000 gallon tank.
Therefore, we recommend that the Colorado Water Quality Commission
review these plans.
Sincerely,
Glen F. Paul , Director
Environmental Health Services
GEP:dr
LONGMONT FIRE :OTECTION DISTRICT _
9119 COUNTY LINE ROAD
LONGMONT, COLORADO 80501
772- 0710
June 21 , 1977
Ken McWilliams RE: Lovemont Investment Co,
Dept. of Planning Services preliminary plat.
Weld County Centennial Center
915 10th Street
Greeley, Colorado 80631
Mr. McWilliams,
We have no problems with the preliminary plat at this
time. We reserve the right to require compliance with
State, County and District regulations on each indiv-
idual building proposed for the complex, as well as
for the complex as a whole.
Thank You.
L il
(i)6) Y\- 2/( 617H,:.<, :) )
Don Marvin, Chief
Longmont Fire Protection District
DM/cmh
RE ibl -�I
ch
co wa iV
�� C�ffi8/0, >>f
SeZ,J `�._.Vi -• �J
I
I l;lIIIf II .I ,rill L. , I .. mi ti III
MAIN ,II DII 1 I cNr1-IONI , (,CIOIiAI)n p;0L0I •.
OllEI1S177 /ll
June 22, 1977 = P,cr52,IF.r.!
Mr. Ken McWilliams
Department of Planning Services L
Weld County Centennail Center
915 10th Street Re: Lovemont Investment Company
Greeley, CO 80631 Preliminary Plat & Re-zoning Request
Dear Ken:
We have made a review of this request and offer the following comments :
1 . The soils are classified as Weld loam, Kim loam, and Wiley-
Colby complex found on a 1 -5o slope. This has an irrigated
capability of Class II and III . The soils, however, have a
fluctuating water table due to poor surface drainage. The
area is bounded by seepy irrigation canals and in general ,
does not produce well .
2. The soils have only slight limitations for roads, foundations
and basements , and are rated as slight to moderate limitations
for septic tanks.
3. There are no major irrigation systems involved. However,
several private laterals traverse the property and should
be either lined with concrete or put in underground pipelines .
4. The area is not affected by a flood plain.
In conclusion due to its relative small size, its present low productivity
and the compatibility with the adjoiing property, we would have no objection
to the zoning change and proposed use.
Sincerely,
J ,'6C (/. , < ,1c-/
Lloyd A. Dickens
President
LAD: r
CONSFRVA IIDN - DEVELOPMENT - SEL.F-GOVERNMENT
STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS Weld County
I 25 & SH 66
JACK KINSTLINGER .'d' EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Farmers ' Mart
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS - DISTRICT 4
r %'a
E. N. HAASE y u DWIGHT M. BOWER
CHIEF ENGINEER '1/4 AN`
''Imc„r+ DISTRICT ENGINEER
STATE OF COLORADO
P.O. BOX 850-1420 - 2ND ST. • GREELEY. COLORADO 80631 • 13031 3531232
June 23, 1977 i::, . DOH FILE 04-41
Mr. Ken McWilliams k\� ✓UPd 977
Department of Planning Services ��
Weld County peck ,
Weld County Centennial Center
C.7m9(tfrnrt '..�
915 Tenth Street
Greeley, Colorado 80631
Dear Mr. McWilliams :
The Colorado Division of Highways has reviewed the application from Lovemont
Investment Company for a preliminary plat and change of zoning from Agricultural
to Commercial Unit Development located in the southeast quadrant of the intersection
of I-25 and S.H. 66. We would like to request that due consideration be given
the following comments concerning access, drainage, and noise pollution.
Access - S.H. 66:
The location as shown on the plat is acceptable to the Division. We will
require the construction of acceleration/deceleration lanes. This should be
at the expense of the developer. Attached is a sketch of our requirements for
access off of S.H. 66. Materials and design shall conform to the Division's
standards and specifications.
Access - Southeast Frontage Road:
The location shown on the plat is not acceptable, as it encroaches into
an area in which the Division has title to access control . The Division has
access control from the angle point in our right of way (near the proposed
approach) northeast to the angle point at S.H. 66, thence easterly 500 feet.
The Division will have no objections to an access off of the frontage road
south of our access-controlled area.
There may be a conflict with the irrigation system located in this immediate
area. When the Division constructed this portion of I-25, we provided a 30" x
301 ' siphon with a concrete inlet. Materials supplied with this request do
not indicate what method for handling the irrigation system will be implemented.
If the access is to be near the irrigation outlet structure, consideration
should be given to keeping it from being a hazard to the traveling public.
Issuance of a Driveway Permit will be required 90 days prior to construction
of accesses. Application should be addressed to Mr. David N. Fraser, District
Maintenance Superintendent, P. 0. Box 850, 1420 Second Street, Greeley, Colorado
80631 . The application should be accompanied by four copies of a construction
drawing showing detail of design and construction as well as the general location
in relation to physical reference points (in this case, distance along roadways
from the interchange of S.H. 66 and I-25) .
r
•
Weld County
I 25 & SH 66
Farmers ' Mart
DOH FILE 04-41
MR. KEN MCWILLIAMS
June 23, 1977
Page Two
Drainage:
The Division is presently using the ditch through Lots 2, 3, 7, and 11 as
a means of removing storm runoff from our right of way. Abandonment of this
system will require an alternate method for handling our runoff which has
historically used this system. Access design shall include the method of
handling highway drainage.
Noise Pollution:
Since the property is located at the intersection of two highways with
an overpass , the noise emitted from them is greater than that of a level roadway.
Developers should give consideration to providing adequate noise setback from
the roadways. As a general rule, this setback for a commercial building would
be 150 to 200 feet from the centerline of S.H. 66 and the southeast ramp of
I-25.
Noise berms or walls, in order to be effective, need to be built to
approximately eight feet above the level of the roadway. However, this would
not be practical due to the elevated roadways. Another recourse would be to
use noise-insulated walls and windows in the construction of buildings abutting
the highways.
Thank you for allowing the Division to make comment on the above.
Very truly yours ,
DWIGHT M. BOWER
DISTRICT ENGINEER
( _0(.. / � %.. � , . �
Albert Chotvacs
Assistant District Engineer
AC: da
Attachment
cc: D. M. Bower
Fraser-Yost
File: Graham w/encl . via
Finch-Patrick-Crier
c. ii: ill- i _ L. c u�
V 'ct N d' d- O +,a .,-
M V_ U_
LO LC)
N N
N N
0))
L 0 ' W cu nj
N co N TQ j —
14 Ii
IL. I— I— 6 sir
L
0U_ LL LL I r_
sue_+ 3 t0 CV (0 o OJ 2 .C U ' N
f O C C 2 r
r ) 1 r ro al ca ca
.J ft) 9f3 C) , 9 9 J --1 r J
0) 1) _ 4.. •.. .r-. I- CU x
C ≥ 0) 0J O O O fJ r 0) 4) ` O -a)-
>.„, m a� W '" m w 2 , U I , / U
0) r 7.3 rll -Cu y x Y Li w o o
ra O U U U O U U O N
_ .C U U S a a IV _C t
e w Q F-- I— F- CC 0) •- ÷' O ,o
\\
7 O r C -calaz
ti
CI z iti —
5 O z
`fir ` .
_,J _ W rn
cj , O L1J tl:5C0
� .Li o c
'0,-
,, 1
›- o
2c-.1-A.,11
_ RAJ o
Ic
�� " ....„
O ear
_t`„ ,. vimum O
JllL
a.
T ID LAM
O \
ez
/
FIELD CHECK '
FILING NUMBER
NAME , A .. !- /nb -7
REQUEST ez?z -P -7_, _._lye_ C
LEGAL DISCRIPTION ff-- Ser , a4 `-- 3 - 6,
'LAND USE N ---_--- `� .} r� �__64�/ ---
S J�J5 LAX/"-14 C119' (a) 111
I'I art' s - _24__C -
.
ZONING N A_
t
LOCATION `- 1. ,� y` E C - al)
Sf ?"7-45/.,
� r'o6 - w -
COMMENTS :
-, 4/ _
O 303-791-3972
:1, i.. ..\._.>“.....:>-,`‘..--4\- .I 609 West Littleton Boulevard Littleton Colorado Sul'20
Inc. - -
,;,-l?. i, /<!/, ,
Mr. and Mrs. Robert Rademacher, ,ft' -^R '.'.
Rt. 1, Box 261, v.. ili
Longmont, Colorado, 80501 f(c ���,e,. "�), .-3
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Rademacher, June 15, 197 c)cs �cs .; O ;)
y
Enclosed is a copy of the proposed Farmers ' Mart PUB plan and the.{`/„ ,,p,j
accompanying transmittal letter. When you and I discussed the possi PY3te ,
of rezoning the property last year, I remember that you were opposed to
rezoning of the property. I promised you that we would do everything
eeasonabi.e we could to keep the higher intensity land uses away from
your home and to provide screening along the south side of the property.
We have attempted to comply with that promise. Please do not hesitate to
contact me if there is any more information you would like, or points
you would like to discuss.
Sincerely,
L daide, Inc. ,
a ,
/
Raymond C. Koernig, "Jr. ,
President
cc: Mr. Ken McWilliams
CONCLUSIONS
The site Is suitable for commercial agribusiness
development . No evidence of geological hazards or
unusual subsoil conditions exist at the site. Both
spread footings and straight-shaft piers are suitable
foundation systems.
SCOPE
This report covers a preliminary soil and geological investigation
for the proposed Farmers Mart Development , located at Interstate 25 and
Colorado State Highway 66 , Weld County, Colorado. The report presents
the general subsoil conditions , geologic se/ting , possible foundation
types , water table conditions , percolation rates , and other pertinent
details.
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
The proposed development is to be divided into three areas for use
as commercial -agricultural related business . We expect structures to be
small to medium sized , having one to two floors . The structures will
generally be lightly to moderately loaded.
SITE CONDITIONS
The subject site encompasses 31 acres and is a portion of the NW,'; of
Sec. 26 , T3N , R6814. The property is bounded to the west by Interstate 25
and to the north by Colorado State Highway 66. Both highways are built
up above the elevation of the site. Foster Reservoir is located approxi-
mately 1/3 mile to the southwest. St. Vrain Creek is located approximately
1-2/3 miles to the southeast.
1
- o -
At the time of our investigation , the subject site was cultivated
in corn and alfalfa. The northeast corner is being used as a storage
area for a commercial building located Immediately east of the property.
The ground surface is undulating with a slight slope downward to the
southwest. The maximum difference in elevation across the site is on
the order of 25 feet . Irrigation ditches border the property to the
north and west and cross the site from west to east . The irrigation
ditches were dry at the time of our investigation.
GEOLOGIC SETTING
The site is situated on a relatively flat terrace approximately
200 feet above St. Vrain Creek, located to the southeast . The subsoils
revealed in our exploratory borings consisted of a relatively thin layer
of sandy clay overlying claystone-sandstone-slltstone bedrock of the
Laramie formation . Surface evidence indicates no apparent conditions
which would constitute a major geologic hazard. We do not anticipate
any unusual problems associated with the site geology or subsoil condi -
tions , provided normal good engineering practices are followed during
planning and construction.
Based upon the United States Geological Survey hydrologic studies ,
the site is not considered a flood-prone area ; however , increased runoff
associated with parking areas , streets and buildings should be considered
in the overall drainage scheme of the area. Buildings should be designed
for seismic forces associated with the Uniform Building Code , Zone I .
There are no commercial mineral deposits at the site within economical
extraction from the surface.
- 3 -
SUBSOIL CONDITIONS
Subsoil conditions were investigated by drilling 3 exploratory holes
at the locations shown on Fig. 1 . The existing crops and surface condi -
tions prevented drilling of additional exploratory holes at this tine.
Generally , the subsoil conditions consisted of IOk to ll feet of soft
to stiff , sandy. clay overlying very hard claystonc- sandstone-silistone
bedrock to the depth Investigated , 20 feet. Swell -consolidation tests
indicate that the upper clays possess a nil to very low swell potential
and will consolidate slightly to excessively under loading. The lower
bedrock also possesses a nil to low swell potential . Swell-consolidation
test results are presented In Figs . 3 through 5.
Free water was encountered from 3 to 10 feet. Jeep across the site.
We expect the free water level to experience some fluctuation with the
amount of irrigation.
FOUNDATION TYPES
Considering the subsoil conditions and the proposed building types ,
we believe that both spread footing and straight-shaft pier foundation
systems are suitable. Footings placed on the upper clays may be designed
for soil pressures ranging from 1 ,000 to 3 ,000 psf . Straight-shaft piers
drilled Into the lower bedrock will have end pressures ranging from
35 ,000 to 60,000 psf. Skin friction of the portion of pier in bedrock
is generally taken as lOz of the end pressure . Due to the presence of
free water, the pier holes will have to be cased.
Deep basement construction is not recorronended because of the shallow
water table. If basement construction is desirable, lower floor levels
•I
- a -
must be protected by a subdraln system.
SLOPE STABILITY
We do not expect heavy cut or fill to take place at this site. For
cut slopes , a slope of 2: 1 (2 horizontal and 1 vertical ) should not be
exceeded. For deep fill , the same configuration should be maintained.
The upper clay soils are subject to erosion and all slopes should be
protected by vegetation.
PERCOLATION TESTS
Percolation tests were conducted at the site in accordance with the
regulations of the Department of Health , Education and Welfare . Percola-
tion test results are presented in Table II . Test results indicate a slow
average percolation rate of 90 min ./Inch. This can be expected with the
relatively impervious upper clay soils. The presence of shallow free
water will also pose a problem to leaching field construction. We recom-
mend a self-contained sewage system for the development instead of individual
leaching field septic systems.
MISCELLANEOUS
This is a preliminary report covering the general feasibility of the
site for commercial development. After the type of development and the
location of the buildings has been determined , a final subsoil investiga-
tion should be conducted in order to define specific foundation types ,
iI
- 5 -
I
design criteria , and other pertinent details.
CHEIJ AND ASSOCIATES , INC.
By
.
(!!!;' � ,n ;� David H . Adams
44,
�0\N,. ,�+ r ' .
_ O / Reviewed By
7RE RIcharca07116 (11271„,,,,-,-----
C. Hhth , P. E.
DHA/med
ii
Deportment
OF HEALTH
Wed County Health Deportment DAVID WERKING. DDS, Greeley
FRANKLIN D YODER, MD, MPH RALPH AAB, Greeley
Dlreclor 1515 HOSPITAL ROAD WILLIAM SLICK. Roggen
GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 DORIS DEE FKE. Greeley
DONALD HERGERT, Windsor
(303(353-0540 ANNETTE M. LOPEZ. Greeley
HERSCHEL PHELPS, JR , M D ,
Ge eeley
KATHLEEN SHAUGHNESSY, Ault
JOE STOCKTON. Gilcrest
July 1 , 1977
F• ;
La
Mr. Gary Fortner, Director Jut,. l l ( o,
Planning Commission (tr> REGEIVLL)
915-10th Street k wellCouy
Greeley, CO 80631 ``r-3, PIMA Cows*
NU110i8i. [ y--`'
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
We recommend Conditional approval of the Lovemont Investment
Corporation - Agricultural to Commercial Unit Development,
provided they investigate the possibility of a system for
the whole area.
Sincerely,
'Glen E. Paul , irecto
Environmental Health Services
GEP:dr
'III,
ii WITH :d illIr I
I6 K.,.•- - f cd
mW
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
4210 E. 11TH AVENUE DENVER 80220 PHONE 386-6111 EXT. 329
ANTHONY ROBBINS. M.D..M.P.A. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
DATE : July 12, 1977
SUBJECT: NON-STATE ASSISTANCE �i�?,1�llj�\
72
REVIEW AND COMMENTS � "'
c� JUL 1977
TO : Mr. Kenneth McWilliams (� RECEIVED 7 7-'21
Weld County Department of Planning Services B'( �0°�4 "'
Weld County Centennial Center �° naisslan
915 10th Street / U
Greeley, CO 80631 Iq' r Itfri: 0
TO :
NA
PROJECT TITLE : Rezoning from Agricultural to Commercial Unit Development and
Preliminary Plan for Farmer's Mart - Lovemont Investment Company
STATE IDENTIFIER :
NA
COMMENTS DUE BY : July 12, 1977
Yesk Not ) Is this project consistent with the goals and
objectives of this agency?
Yes LI No Lg Is there evidence of overlapping of duplica -
tion with other agencies?
Yes !f1 No Ii Is meeting desired with applicant?
Yes ] I No [LI A 15-day extension is requested .
Comments : The Department of Health has no objections to the approval of this plan.
However, we concur with the findings and recommendations of the preliminary soil
and geologic investigation relative to the method of sewage disposal.
The use of individual septic tanks is the least desirable of several alterna-
tives; the presence of shallow ground water will pose a problem to leaching field
operation and will require other treatment methods.
Please note that, in accordance with Senate Bill 35, any development serving
i f igad
Name , Title E -Phone
Ron Simsick, Program Administrator
SOC- 3 , Feb 77
ATTACHMENT B
Lovemont Investment Company - Page 2
more than 20 people (including a central septic system of greater than 2000
gallons) must receive site plan approval from the Water Quality Control
Commission before construction will be allowed to commence.
Air Permits may be required for emission sources. If point sources are
to be constructed within the development, contact the Air Pollution Control
Division for assistance and further information if needed.
July 21 , 1977
CENTRAL SEWAGE SYSTEM STUDY
FOR
FARMERS ' MART
The following is a report concerning the feasibility
and economics of a central sewage system and treat-
ment plant for Farmers ' Mart . Farmers ' Mart is
located in the Southeast Quadrant of Interstate
Highway 25 and State Highway 66 in Weld County.
The project is located a considerable distance from
the nearest sewer district and treatment facility.
The proposed usage of the site is for agricultural
business facilities . At this time , the specific
sewage requirements for the individual tenants are
not known.
A preliminary layout for a central sewage system
has been designed by this office , and tie cost break-
down , totaling approximately $78 , 000 . 00 is enclosed .
For the number of proposed users on this 35 acre
site , the cost to the developer of providing a
central sewage system is prohibitive .
Percolation tests were performed on the site by
Chen and Associates , Inc . Due to the relatively
(1 )
impervious upper clay soils , part of the site
indicated a slow percolation test . At another
location on the site , the percolation rate was 30
minutes per inch. At the time of construction ,
percolation tests will he required for each in-
dividual site . If the percolation rate does not
meet the requirements of the Department of Health ,
it is recommended that a self-contained sewage
system be developed for that particular site .
Due to the fact that the cost is prohibitive for
a central sewage treatment , and because of the
problem of disposing of the effluent from the
treatment plant , it appears that on-lot septic
systems are the only feasible solution .
(2)
Engineers Estimate for Central Sewer System
- Farmers ' Mart -
8" Sewer Line
1500 LF x 9 . 00/LF $ 13 , 500 . 00
Manholes
6 ea. x- 7 . 00/ea 4 , 200, 00 .
Treatment Plant 30 , 000 . 00
Engineering 5 , 000 . 00
10% Contingencies 5 , 270 . 00
57 , 970 . 00
1 Acre of Land 20 , 000 . 00
$ 77 , 970 . 00
O
Lovemont Investment Company
Z-286 : 77 : 4
S-135 : 77: 5
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS
June 17, 1977
Theo and Elizabeth Radamacher
Route 1 , Box 293
Longmont, Colorado 80501
Valley Sixty Six
Chicago-Colorado Partners
32 W. Randolph Street
1313 18th Floor
Civic Tower Building
Chicago , Illinois 60601
Attention : William Arnold
Frederick M. and Donna L. Sekich
P.O. Box 508
Longmont, Colorado 80501
Nicholas and Karen Sekich
P.O. Box 508
Longmont , Colorado 80501
Hello