The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20193500.tiffEXHIBIT INVENTORY CONTROL SHEET CASE PUDZ19-0001 - T3 LAND AND INVESTMENT, LLC Exhibit Submitted By Description A. Planning Commission Resolution of Recommendation B. Planning Commission Summary of Hearing (Minutes dated 5/7/2019) C. Planning Services PowerPoint Presentation D. Applicant PowerPoint Presentation E. Public Works F. Applicant G. Applicant PowerPoint Presentation (received 8/7/19) H. I . J. K. L. M. N. O. P. Q. R. S. T. U. V. W. Staff comments about Timmerman Industrial Park Site Plan Option B (dated 7/12/19) Email including Change of Zone Site Plan and Kellar Engineering Variance Request Response Letter (received 8/7/19) 2019-3500 Public hearings concerning this property will be heard before the County Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners. Both hearings will be held at: Request: A PUD (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION FOR FOUR (4) LOTS WITH C-3 (BUSINESS COMMERCIAL), C-4 (HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL), I-1 (INDUSTRIAL), 1-2 (INDUSTRIAL) AND I-3 (INDUSTRIAL) USES. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ( 1S S HI.WJAT THE WELD PLANNING SERVICES, AT 970-353-6100, ext 3531 For Additional Information visit www weldcountyplanningcases.org fYimf ✓(y1 onl l/1.A d40. M...1 1"ati. .I4N U(* I+npt)f/fn ',own 01 opnu'*$' h—.. and t.1"t.Nt of Ma .tW•Mt H.xJ ..+ .II[NIKW MQ opus «, ,�/un.lw inn Site ip4t1k= �' 1.w-,wJc '...t 1.01 /MY1Y.i 111 111.1 /YMI,GI..Y Vi i.�7f11 iltl f1Yy//w LGti1F./ mall anti *Mtd of l "•'1Y LO1•TWw"� Irt1n.M art rt. IW..4�'� f^^�� a 1 r S 4'a 1 EXHIBIT v. cool Planned Unit Development Change of Zone PUD 190001 Applicant: T3 Land & Investment LLC do AGPROfessionals, LLC 3050 67t" Ave Greeley, CO 80634 AG PROfessionals llEVELui'�.KS OF AGRICUL'fUKE Request • Planned Unit Development (PUD) Change of Zone: • Existing Zone District: • A (Agricultural) • Proposed Zoning: • PUD Zone District w/ Commercial & Industrial Uses: • C-3, C-4, I-1, I-2 & 1-3 AGPROfessionals DEVELO'ERS OF AGRICULTURE 4 Platteville 4 Vicinity Map Keenesburg a Roadway Classification Highway Arterial Collector Local — Paved Local - Gravel AGPROfessionals DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE Site Location Timmerman Feedlot Lot B RECX19-0011 Lot A RECX19-0011 20 Acres +/- DCP Compressor Station Functional Classifications AGPROfessionals DEVELOPERS Ur AGRICULI URA: Site - Existng Conditions I i AGPROfessionals DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE Site Plan Gas Line Easements Tract A 3.9 Acres +1- Outlot 0.4 Acres +/- I z .cu. ✓_ fR f:' Pt I I I I It I 5 Stormwater Detention A :+)L....04;, at Mt *aNCC.. S 2.7 Acres +/- IsCr:0-a: CO ..c u•.a •—_ _ -- _. -_ a '.,.,.cam,.., -., e ' z: ti, -.. _ _" a--' 1— ,;�� Inn. -. WCR 44 3.8 Acres +/- O&G Tank — . removed Residence — to be removed 4 Acres +/- AGPROfessionals DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE Applicant Obligations Sec. 27-6-120. - PUD Change of Zone 1. Consistent with Weld County Code 2. Uses are Consistent with Performance Standards of Zone District 3. Compatible with Existing & Future Development 4. Adequate Water and Sewage 5. Adequate Street & Highway Facilities 6. Compliance with Ch. 23 Requirements - Overlay District, Mineral Deposits, and Soil Conditions 7. Consistency between Development Guide, Zone District and Uses and PUD Sketch Plan comments adequately addressed. AGPROfessionals 1.OPERS OF AGR1C.ULTU1t1-. Consistency wl Comprehensive Plan • Sec. 22-6-20. Economic Development Goals and Policies • E. ECON Goal 5. Recognize and promote specific places and resources in the County that can uniquely support the economic development. • 1. ECON.5.1.a. Develop a program to create "shovel -ready" industrial sites throughout the County, where primary job providers would be able to develop or re -develop. Zoning, infrastructure and services would ideally be immediately available for use in such areas. AGPROfessionals DEVELOt'LRS OF AGRICULTURE Consistency wl PUD Zone District • 27-1-10. — PUD Intent. • The PUD is intended to allow an alternative method for property owners and developers to apply flexibility in developing land. AGPROfessionals DEVELOPERS OFAGRIGUL"PURE Compatible with Existing & Future Development ��. }.ywt X se" to 4071prook• V+ Truck Parking Commercial Rec. Facility Feedlot O&G Facility, Support Facilities, and Non -1041 Major Facility Tri-State DCP Compressor Station Functional Classifications Arterial As Collector AGPROfessionals DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE • Adequate Utilities Water: Central Weld County Water District Water Study Completed: • Taps: Four 1.5" taps • Water dedication: CBT shares / cash -in -lieu • Improvements: Line extension & booster pump • Fire Protection: One 3/4" tap, 2 hydrants Division of Water Resources: • Water supply adequate Sewage Disposal: Septic Systems Electric and Gas Service: PVREA and Propane AG PROfessionals DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULI URE Adequate Street & Highway Facilities Functional Classifications AG PRO fessionals DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE Overlay Districts, Mineral Deposits & Soil Conditions • Overlay Districts: • No Floodplain / Geologic Hazard • Airport Overlay Districts: Greeley -Weld Airport • Mineral Deposits: • No economically recoverable coal, metallic or sand/gravel resources • Oil & gas extraction: not impeded • Soil Conditions: • No moderate / severe soil limitations AGPROfessionals DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE Development Guide, Zone, Uses & Staff Comments • Consistency Exists Between: • Specific Development Guide • Zone District • Uses • PUD Sketch Plan staff and referral agency comments have been adequately addressed AGPROfessionals DEVELOFERs OF AGRICULTURE Specific Development Guide • Component 1: Environmental Impacts • Noise, vibration, smoke, dust, odors, heat, light, drainage & wetland/wildlife protection • • Component 2: Service Provision Impacts • Schools, law enforcement, fire protection, emergency services & utility provisions Components 3 - 6: Site Design • Landscaping & signage — Site Plan Review • Open space • Components 7 - 8: RUA & IGAs S AG PROfessionals DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE Sketch Plan Comments Addressed • PUD Sketch Plan staff and referral agency comments have been adequately addressed: • 2 -Lot Recorded Exemption • Water Supply • Drainage Report • Access Requirements & Roadway Improvements AGPROfessionals DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULI`URE • • Access & Roadway Improvements Existing Conditions: • Speed Limit: CR 44: 55 MPH, CR 49: 65 MPH • CR 44 Traffic Counts: 1,062 AADT, 34% Trucks Traffic Impact Study: • Projected Traffic Counts: 4,829 ADT • AM Peak Hour Trips: 246 (146 in, 100 out) • PM Peak Hour Trips: 270 (107 in, 162 out) • Turn Lanes Warranted: • EB Left -Turn Lane at CR 44/Site Access • WB Right -Turn Lane at CR 44/Site Access • Access: • Meets spacing requirements Signal Warrant Analysis - AM Peak Hour MINOR STREET HIGHER - VOLUME APPROACH - VPH 6)30 500 400 3)D 100 Figure 4C-3. Warrant 3, Peak How HHITIHHT' .. 2 OR .I MORE LANES 8 2 L i OR MORE I LANES I , . . _ 2 OR MORE LANES 1 & 1 1 LANE 1 I. . . 1 LANE 8 1 LANE - - A. J.- _ - 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 MAJOR STREET --TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES - VEHICLES PEA HOUR NVPH} 'Note 150 v,pn applies as the lower threstic l ourne tcr a mince -street. approach n ith two cr mero lures and 100 vph apples as the crnor threshed volume far a msror- rt rt approach with one Lane Pont: 265, 100 2020 Short Range Total AM Peak Hour CR 44 & Site Access 150• 100 1700 1600 AGPROfessionals DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE Signal Warrant Analysis — PM Peak Hour GOO JJJ MINOR 3 STREET 4)' HIGHER - VOLUME 3)D APPROACH VPH • 100 Figure 4C-3. Warrant 3, Peak Hour •` • • � ► • • . I I. i T T d _ 1 I I 2 OR MORE LANES 8 2 OA PJORE LANES . ,' I - 2 CR MOPE LANES it: I -ai LANE p -weLANE f. I LANE • .�., -111,ILL - - - - - - - 440 500 600 700 800 940 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1%0 MAJOR STREET TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES - VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) 'Nate 150 vpn applies as the :ower :nrei-MOi aume'or a rranor•stteel aperca h In1th two cf. rrcc tare:, and 100 vph apples as the lower th •eshokt volume for a mire• suee1 approach with one lane Point 309. 162 2020 Short Range Total PM Peak Hour CR 44 & Site Access -1149 1 te.,0' 10:Y 1700 18)) IIIDEVELOPERS OFAGRICULCURE Ac PRO fessionals Gas Line Easements Tract A 3.9 Acres +/- ;AND Er Ell • .•C- • ET E— - TE s E -11) CU E L int F sui• UsE U`i ersA' M U'•t u -.t FL • E L - l l ▪ T . U! [wEtitTT 41 Tett.. E- E[fl E C- E• •T TTE II[ • LE I T E•' l I Eli Deeded ROW EIETT•E- 1 1 ASsftlis • I • li U Previous Site Plan 3.1 Acres +/- -r T 1 sr- r- IL 1- CC • [ m •L I ►T F - - Stormwater Detention 3.75 Acres +/- O&G Tank -- removed Residence — to be removed i i i k i 7 I i I •a AGPROfessionals DEVELUi'ERS OF AGRICULTURE Gas Line Easements 0.4 Acres +/- Deeded ROW Revised Site Plan Stormwater Detention O&G Tank removed Residence - to be removed Act PROfessionals DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE Roadway Improvements — TIS Recommendation 435' EB Left -Turn Lane Gas Line Easements Site Access 330' WB Right -Turn Lane 150' Full Width, 180' Bay Taper) Google WCR 44 AG PROfessionals DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE Additional Requested Improvements 330' Redirect Taper 435' EB Left -Turn Lane Gas Line Easements SB Left -Turn Lane & SB Right -Turn Lane at Site Access 330' WB Right -Turn Lane 150' Full Width, 180' Bay Taper) Google 100' Expansion of Storage Length EB Left -Turn Lane WC R 44 AGPROfessionals DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE Roadway Improvements - Revised to COOT Standards S SB Left -Turn Lane & SB Right -Turn Lane at Site Access 330' Redirect Taper 600' EB Left -Turn Lane Gas Line Easements 100' Expansion of Storage Length EB Left -Turn Lane AGPROfessionals DEVELOPERS OF AGRIGUL"I URE S 0 Roadway Improvements - Revised to Move Access SB Left -Turn Lane & SB Right -Turn Lane at Site Access: (50' Full Width, 90' Bay Taper, 97' Redirect Taper) r - 330' Redirect Taper 600' EB Left -Turn Lane (378' Full Width, 222' Bay Taper) Gas Line Easements Y a Google Jars WCR 44 100' Expansion of Storage Length EB Left -Turn Lane AGPROfessionals DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE Roadway Improvements - Revised at PW Request SB Left -Turn Lane & SB Right -Turn Lane at Site Access: (140' Full Width, 90' Bay Taper, 125' Redirect Taper) �L.... z 330' Redirect Taper r - • Illy-_ J_..Vim♦ TI ,.•••••_ 650' EB Left -Turn Lane (378' Full Width, 222' Bay Taper) Gas Line Easements 600' WB Right -Turn Lane (378' Full Width, 222' Bay Taper) Google • • 100' Expansion of Storage Length EB Left -Turn Lane WC R 44 AG PROfessionals LEVELUt'ERS OF AGRICULTURE • File Animate Graphics Qptwns Help Traffic Model - PM Peak Hour Simiralic 9 - C:1Kellar...ng1KE 2018 Projects\T3 Land & Investments UC\Synchro12020 Short Range Total PM Traffic.syn GINsow I 14« Additional Public Works Requirements 4 4 • t • gat 41- Y I► SB Left -Turn Lane & SB Right -Turn Lane at Site Access: (140' Full Width, 90' Bay Taper, 125' Redirect Taper) 330' Redirect Taper Access: 980' Spacing from ROW to ROW 650' EB Left -Turn Lane Gas Line Easements Radius: WB-67 Template 600' WB Right -Turn Lane (378' Full Width, 222' Bay Taper) Google • . Reserved ROW for Grade Separation: 2 -Acres +/- WC R 44 100' Expansion of Storage Length EB Left -Turn Lane Ac;fPRO essionals DES ELUPERs OF AGRICUL'1 URE CR 49 & 44 Intersection - Ultimate Design CR 49/44 Intersection The Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) awarded Weld County a Hazard Elimination grant for $828,000 in order to address safety issues by realigning WCR 44 and cutting the hill on WCR 49 to address the sight distance. In addition, this project involved widening the intersection to its ultimate design of four lanes of concrete pavement with turn lanes. The design was completed by SEH and the contractor was Scott Contracting, Inc. If you have any questions, please contact the Project Manager, Cameron Parrott, at (970) 304- 6496 x3745. AGPROfesssonals DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE IMUSRI8 17-0023 - DCP Operating Co. WCR 49: 140' ROW c9 PROPOSED AMINE SYSTEM AREA (SEE DWG C-2) 'I 7IT'i A I (E) CROSSROADS FACILITY i 1 PARCEL 105a-16-3-00-002 WATER OE TENT CAL l i EATUREJ STORM TER • NO.DUILD OR STORAGE AREA TEO VOLUME 01,010 OF ( E WATER QUALITY FEATURE/ ST0RMWAT NO -BUILD OR STORAGE • l TOTAL (E) VOLUME. 81.010 CT i 4 1It 1 1 1 1 1 1 13 1 1 24 d 140" R.O.W. Winte,a9r1 IRIS ET 111 1 (E) 60' R.O.W. 40' FUTURE R.O.W. -. I -. ■W! -- »"t TEMPORARY TE CONSTRUCTION TRAEERS 6O' TT? RADIUS 1O1 FUTURE R-O.W. WCR 44: 80' ROW VICINITY MAP W.C.R. 44 (80' 1' - 300 Book 48, Page 121, Reception 4 /5'X I MIEN PLOTTED • 22'*SC vim am s MIMI AGPROfessionals ULNEL(JL'ERS OF AGRICULTURE 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i Proposed Roadway Improvements t riarwit SB Left -Turn Lane & SB Right -Turn Lane at Site Access: (140' Full Width, 90' Bay Taper, 125' Redirect Taper) tea - 330' Redirect Taper 650' EB Left -Turn Lane (378' Full Width, 222' Bay Taper) 600' WB Right -Turn Lane (378' Full Width, 222' Bay Taper) I. 100' Expansion of Storage Length EB Left -Turn Lane AG PRO fessionals DLVELOI'ERS OF AGRICULTURE Referrals, Conditions, Development Standards • 12 local, state and federal referral agencies responded • PUDZ materials reviewed, approved & conditioned • 5 Conditions of Approval C■ AGPROfessionals DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE Ap p I icant Ob I ■ I g ations Sec. 27-6-120. - PUD Change of Zone ✓ Consistent with Weld County Code ✓ Uses are Consistent with Performance Standards of Zone District ✓ Compatible with Existing & Future Development ✓ Adequate Water and Sewage ✓ Adequate Street & Highway Facilities ✓ Compliance with Ch. 23 Requirements - Overlay District, Mineral Deposits, and Soil Conditions ✓ Consistency between Development Guide, Zone District and Uses and PUD Sketch Plan comments adequately addressed. Planned Unit Development Change of Zone PUD 190001 Applicant: T3 Land & Investment LLC do AGPROfessionals, LLC 3050 67th Ave Greeley, CO 80634 AGPROfesssonals DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE EXHIBIT MEMORANDUM TO: Kelsey Bruxvoort, AGPROfessionals FROM: Evan Pinkham, Public Works DATE July 12. 2019 SUBJECT: Timmerman Industrial Park Site Plan Option B 'a„ -OOO k Public Works has reviewed the proposed layout for the Timmerman Industrial Site Plan Option B. To meet the Weld County Code requirements without a variance, both Lots A and B would access County Road 44 off the internal subdivision road. The subdivision road would intersect with County Road 44 at least 1320' feet from County Highway 49. The applicant has indicated that they do not desire to meet these requirements and had submitted a variance request. Therefore, Public Works will accept a variance to the spacing criteria provided the following conditions are met These safety requirements are to provide for safe ingress and egress for subdivision traffic as well as the travelling public onto County Road 44. 1. Intersection Spacing: 980' is required between the west right-of-way line for County Highway 49 and the east right-of-way line for the internal road. The submitted site plan shows 964' between the section line for County Highway 49 and the centerline of the subdivision roadway. Eastbound left-hand auxiliary lane: There is no storage provided in the eastbound left-hand auxiliary lane. The traffic impact study shows 22 turns from this auxiliary lane in the peak hour. Please identify the vehicle types that will be making the turns and provide storage length in accordance with the State Highway Access Code. 3. Grade Separation: Label the reserved right-of-way for the future grade separated crossing of County Road 44 and County Highway 49. 4. Vehicle Turning Movements: Provide AutoTURN design template utilizing a WB-67 vehicle showing how it will safely accommodate turning movements into the subdivision and onto County Road 44. Show a vehicle in all three lanes on the subdivision roadway and in the deceleration and left turn lane of WCR 44. 5. Internal Roadway: Access locations onto the subdivision roadway may be limited due to the layout and safety concerns. The auxiliary lane provided on the subdivision roadway does not meet the State Highway Access Code for 25 mph, please update. RECX15-0109 (4159269) Access Easement: Show the location of a new easement for Lot A of RECX15-0109 since the access location will be closed. 7. Eastbound left-hand auxiliary lane (County Road 44): The line weight on the submitted site plan does not clearly show the additional 100' of storage length that is required in the eastbound left- hand auxiliary lane on County Road 44 at County Highway 49. Please modify to plat to clearly reflect the storage length. Public Works will review subsequent submittals based on the criteria outlined above. Please contact me with any comments or concerns. EXHIBIT AGPRO fessionals DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE :mg aI'C)rch Awards furH:thICN LViiiner v. t • -odo From: Kelsey Bruxvoort Sent: Monday, June 24, 2019 11:26 AM To: Evan Pinkham <epinkham@weldgov.com>; Sean Kellar <skellar@kellarengineering.com>; DBTimmer49@hotmail.com; Tim Naylor <tnaylor@agpros.com> Cc: Dawn Anderson <dranderson@weldgov.com>; Don Dunker <ddunker@weldgov.com>; Hayley Balzano <hbalzano@co.weld.co.us>; Elizabeth Relford <erelford@weldgov.com> Subject: RE: T3 Land PUDZ19-0001 Hi Evan, We have revised the T3 Land PUDZ19-0001 Change of Zone site plan to relocate the access as far west on the site as possible and accommodate auxiliary lanes designed in accordance with the State of Colorado State Highway Access Code (SHAC), as requested by Public Works. Please see the attached PUD Change of Zone site plan. Please note, there are several existing easements along the western boundary of the site containing high-pressure gas lines. We have shown the entire 60' ROW for our access road east of these easements. Also attached is the Kellar Engineering Variance Request Response Letter written in response to the 'T3 Land CR 44 and CR 49 variance response letter 040519' issued by Don Dunker. Please review the response letter and revised site plan and provide comments. Feel free to call with any questions, Thank you, Kelsey Bruxvoort Land Planner AGPROfessionals 3050 67th Avenue Greeley, CO 80634 Office: 970-535-9318 Mobile: 970-744-0068 Fax: 970-535-9854 www.agpros.com AG PROfessionals DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE 21)19 arlo rCl Awards Po'. Ethics Winner From: Evan Pinkham <epinkham@weldgov.com> Sent: Friday, April 05, 2019 1:29 PM To: Kelsey Bruxvoort <Kbruxvoort@agpros.com>; Sean Kellar <skellar@kellarengineering.com>; DBTimmer49@hotmail.com; Tim Naylor <tnaylor@agpros.com> Cc: Dawn Anderson <dranderson@weldgov.com>; Don Dunker <ddunker@weldgov.com>; Hayley Balzano 3 <hbalzano@co.weld.co.us>; Elizabeth Relford <erelford@weldgov.com> Subject: T3 Land PUDZ19-0001 Kelsey, Please see the attached response to the variance request regarding auxiliary lanes associated with PUDZ19-0001. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Evan Evan Pinkham, MPA Weld County Public Works 1111 H Street, P.O. Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 (970)400-3727 Confidentiality Notice: This electronic transmission and any attached documents or other writings are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify sender by return e-mail and destroy the communication. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action concerning the contents of this communication or any attachments by anyone other than the named recipient is strictly prohibited. 4 KELLAR ENGINEERING April 18, 2019 AG P ROE essiona Is 3050 67th Avenue, Suite 200 Greeley, CO 80634 RE: WCR 44 West of WCR 49 T3 Land Variance Request Response This letter is in response to the April 5, 2019 letter that AGPROfessionals received from Weld County, County Engineer on the WCR 44 West of WCR 49 T3 Land Variance Request Response letter (Weld County Letter). The Weld County Letter indicates that Weld County uses the State of Colorado State Highway Access Code for designing auxiliary lanes. Additionally, Weld County criteria is 660' intersection spacing for WCR 44. The proposed access complies with the intersection spacing standard. Additionally, the auxiliary lanes and access location will be revised to be designed in accordance with the State of Colorado State Highway Access Code (SHAC). CR 44 has a posted speed of 55 mph adjacent to the project site. Per Table 4-6 in the SHAC, the following are the geometric requirements of the auxiliary lanes at the proposed access to CR 44: • Westbound right -turn lane = 600' total length (222' bay taper + 378' full width) with a 12' minimum lane width. • Eastbound left -turn lane = 600' total length (222' bay taper + 378' full width) with a 12' minimum lane width. The T3 Land Traffic Impact Study (TIS) will be updated to demonstrate compliance with this auxiliary lane geometry and with 34% trucks (per Weld County Letter). Additionally, the proposed access point location will be shifted as necessary to accommodate the required auxiliary lane geometry. Based upon the above information, the proposed access meets Weld County criteria and a variance request for the access spacing is no longer necessary. 1 of li KELLAR ENGINEERING If you have any questions or need anything further, please do not hesitate to contact me at (970) 219-1602 or skellar@kellarengineering.com. Respectfully, Sean K. Kellar, PE, PTOE Colorado PE #38650 Kellar Engineering LLC April 18, 2019 2of2 LEGEND Pe O♦ 0 a EXISTING PROPERTY LINE EXISTING EDGE OF ASPHALT EXISTING WOOD FENCE EXISTING BARBWIRE FENCE EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY EXISTING GAS UNE EXISTING BOTTOM OF DITCH EXISTING UTILITY POLE EXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY TRAFFIC C1RCUlATION Palo TYPICAL ROAD SECTION (SITE ACCESS1 li teal as y Itimm I •TkdkstdaaatMaws ofIler %ks Aptat MIA) ea0 Aware lee Cans (ABC)swimaa edyac pr�Oe Maw a Os ham Its forsaissm64Aebps via be ramps M)I uYrprobeawW 41 hI ) AN ass ddI w esrd ae/ sakiY 4 Addalms ROW Lacy be esp,wl b plies Wate a ae. a roads-ltraeaa ss ' saws ada us appe•d pea irtinita: TmdTaar\ • I. 1 )Sder _—__ _Vet c -- L-- i��) )--l.Mrpactd>.ry,uJe 1 >. • 04A -J Pant I.\1 T\ Pit Al. • ABC IC1aey t kths sit LION TYPICAL ROAD SECTION (CR 44) rcIIOSCA1 TIMMERMAN INDUSTRIAL PARK Psi JOSCAtt I I I I I I I J a i 'iv. eft- live tit A[tJ%t N 4 1 - EXISTING PROPERTY BOUNDARY \ \ \ 3C 't VPACCESS I SW' \ \ \ I I • 1 I TRACT A (3 89 AC) PROPOSED DETENTION POND • 2 9 AC -FT (NO BUILD / NO STORAGE) PROPOSED LOT UNE • 50 GAS : 4M IASf ML I I IpA5' I \ c.As Mk' M' \;. 4% • OUTLOT (0.43 AC) CHC l I I Y•� LOT I (266AC1 i I 11 1 e I I LOT3 I+ I (2.01 AC) I I I CAs ` CAS I / • I W s CAS EXISTING PROPERTY BOUNDARYMt ex%TSE E Pa tom MiTER'r i.• Of REM eifl, fX,sto4.I I FCE trey) LOT 2 (3 79 AC) 3a.244. -k .ASt Vt A' PROPOSED LOT LINE $ A S+) z 3 e — O O / I X w� 31 ♦: W K a x - / I . . \1 St a - ��T'�At CAS CAS CAS -CI • a't -op( .'Tl HAv TN/if • ONE -•--CHE --+0NE ass mint COUNTY RD 44 • a AINnO u. rat . • 1 a I C T I a .4 I 1 s X $5588 "� Ito wSO aJv� 5- fessionals AGRICUI:I LAO. slay. CO eon 535-9854 DEVI 3050 67m AvE (970) S ottlails O ist W its -y .,A. AN OP' ��,,, EXHIBIT P . \• -0 co \ Planned Unit Development Change of Zone PUDZI 9-0001 Applicant: T3 Land & Investment LLC c/o AGPROfessionals, LLC 3050 67t" Ave Greeley, CO 80634 A( T r RO t esstutiais t?, k(ICI;LI LAO. 1 Street and highway facilities: - Adequate in functional classification, width and structural capacity to support the proposed uses 2 Access and roadway improvements: (AGPRO Plan) - Has undergone several revisions - Traffic Impact Study prepared by professional traffic engineer, turn lanes warranted: - Eastbound Left -Turn Lane and Westbound Right -Turn Lane at the Site Access point on CR 44 Access & Roadway Improvements • Existing Conditions: • Speed Limit: CR 44: 55 MPH, CR 49: 65 MPH • CR 44 Traffic Counts: 1,062 AADT, 34% Trucks • Traffic Impact Study: • Projected Traffic Counts: 4,829 ADT • AM Peak Hour Trips: 246 (146 in, 100 out) • PM Peak Hour Trips: 270 (107 in, 162 out) • Turn Lanes Warranted: • EB Left -Turn Lane at CR 44/Site Access • WB Right -Turn Lane at CR 44/Site Access • Access: • Meets spacing requirements AGPRofessionaIs Signal Warrant Analysis: - As requested by PW - AM Peak Hour traffic volumes so low, don't make it onto the graph Signal Warrant Analysis — AM Peak Hour 600 MINOR STREET goo HIGHER VOLUME )00 APPROACH VPH ?00 • 100 Figure 4C-3 Warrant 3, Peak Hour i 2 OA MORE LANES 8 2 OR ADORE LANES i 2OA MORE LANES t I LANE I I uLNE 8 I LANE Oft • 1W 100• 400 500 600 700 000 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1000 1700 1800 MAJOR STREET -TOTAL. OF BOTH APPROACHES -- VEHICLES PEP HOUR (VPH) -Note ISO vph appues as as lower evestholi voters fora mnor-steee approach we two or n as twice and 100 wh apphs as en Ion I hreshotl roan* lot a mwa-seed approach WO one lane Point 265. 100 2020 Short Range Total AM Peak Hour CR 44 & Site Access AGPROfessionais 4 Signal Warrant Analysis: - PM Peak Hour traffic volumes so low, don't make it onto the graph - Traffic Signal not warranted Signal Warrant Analysis — PM Peak Hour Figure 4C-3 Warrant 3, Peak Hour SOO 500 MINOR STREET X00 HIGHER VOLUME 300 APPROACH VPH 200 . J. I I I I OA MORE LANES $ 2 OR MORE LANES 2ORi �E LANES S., t LANE l . LAM I a 1 LM! I l _ 100' 500 Epp 700 tlp0 900 1000 1100 1200 flt 140) 1500 1100 1700 taw MAJOR STREET --TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES — VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) 'Pins ISO v$1 apples as the lower tlrastloid rearms for a tenor steer spproC wth tag or more lanai and 100 vph appbes as Pa bar streamld vdume for a mom -sleet approach with one rane Point 309. 162 2020 Short Range Total PM Peak Hour CR 44 & Site Access AUPRofessionals 5 Initial site layout: (AGPRO Plan) - Meets 660' access spacing requirement for an arterial roadway In compliance with code and Traffic Impact Study recommendation 6 Revised site layout #5: - Access: 964' spacing - 5th revision, per PW requests - Meets or exceeds: - Access spacing requirements for arterial roadway - Traffic Impact Study recommendation IIIM CDOT standards State Highway Access Code (SHAG) standards - Fire safety requirements - Not possible to move access further without encroaching on gas line easements 7 1. Original Site Plan: (AGPRO Plan) - Turn -lane geometry recommended by the TIS: - 435' EB Left -Turn Lane - 330' WB Right -Turn Lane - Meets access spacing requirements and the recommendation of the Traffic Engineer Not accepted 8 2. Site Plan #2, revised w/ additional requested improvements: - Additional agreed upon improvements. as requested by PW - 330' Redirect Taper west of EB Left -Turn Lane - 100' Expansion of Storage Length of EB Left -Turn Lane on CR 44 at CR 49 intersection - Two SB Turn Lanes at Site Access, one Left -Turn and one Right -Turn Lane for traffic exiting the development - Variance request submitted to have turn lane design warranted by the Traffic Impact Study accepted w/ additional improvements 9 3. Site Plan #3, revised to meet CDOT Standards: - PW required Construction Drawings before issuing response to the PUD Sketch Plan Variance Request - Construction Drawings not in code for PUD Sketch Plan - AGPRO requested meeting instead: - 9 PW staff members present - PW stated multiple times at meeting that 660' spacing would be sufficient - PW stated CDOT Standards were required for turn lanes - PW later issued written response to Variance Request: 980' minimum spacing 10 4. Site Plan #4, revised to move access: - Access relocated to try to meet 980' spacing Access cannot be moved any further west - Entire 60' ROW width of internal drive must be outside gas line easements located on western property boundary - 964' measured from centerline to centerline (only 16' under 980' spacing) - Meets Fire District requirements (600' cul-de-sac length) - Exceeds CDOT standards and County Access Spacing Requirements SB Left -Turn Lane & SB Right -Turn Lane at Site Access: (50' Full Width. 90' Bay Taper. 97 Redirect Taper) 11 5. Site Plan #5, revised per additional PW requirements: - PW required expansion of SB turn lanes internal to the PUD - Internal roadway designed to State Highway Access Code Standards (SHAG) for 25 mph - Additional 50' of storage added to be conservative - Radius of cul-de-sac designed using a WB-62 template for truck turning radii to be conservative (WB-50 industry standard design template; - Additional 50' of storage added to EB Left -Turn Lane on CR 44, as requested by PW Exceeds CDOT standards, SHAC Standards, County Access Spacing Requirements and meets Fire District Requirements SB Left -Turn Lane & SB Right -Turn Lane at Site Access: (140' Full Width, 90' Bay Taper. 125 Redirect Taper) 12 Additional PW requirements: - Move access to 980' measured edge of ROW to edge of ROW - (Previous instructions: distance measured centerline to centerline) - Design cul-de-sac using a WB-67 template, instead of a WB-62 - (Increased again from WB-50 industry standard) Reserve 2 -acre ROW for a fly -over CR 44 and 49 - Access located at 980' would be directly on top of several high-pressure gas lines - ROW Reservation: During expansion of CR 49, the County contemplated a grade separated overpass (flyover w/ CR 44 going over the top of CR 49). - Bid as an Additional Requested Element (ARE) and a conceptual plan was prepared by County - No formal process to obtain ROW and develop construction plans has begun - Reserved 2 -Acre ROW area for no plans is extreme and could be considered a taking SB Left -Turn Lane & SB Right -Turn Lane at Site Access: (140 Full Width, 90' Bay Taper, 125' Redirect Taper) 13 County Website: - Ultimate Design of the CR 44 and 49 intersection - Four lanes w/ turn lanes. CR 49 & 44 Intersection - Ultimate Design CR 49/44 Intersection The Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) awarded Weld County a Hazard Elimination grant for $828,000 in order to address safety issues by realigning WCR 44 and cutting the hill on 'WCR 49 to address the sight distance. In addition, this project involved widening the intersection :o its ultimate design of four lanes of concrete pavement with turn lanes. The design was completed by SEH and the contractor was Scott Contracting, Inc. f you have any questions, please contact the Project Manager, Cameron Parrott, at (97Q) 304- 3496 x3745. Y AGPRO I URI. 14 DCP Midstream 1MUSR18-17-0023: - Not required to dedicate/reserve ROW for a flyover - PUD being held to a different standard 1 MUSRI 8-17-0023 — DCP Operating Co. - L _.. ' wCR 49: __ ,_- ��, 140' ROW ---- ; • tl 1 i l *it rd.--; a t' i`; QG A. 1 ob .......M.Ell.-........., 7� 140' R.O.W. (E) 60' f R.O.W. A 40' FUTURE R 3 11: ' ' r3 I 3 O.W. • - 1, , ��.�.. �• . :.� ,, . _ lei , .., ...: : ry �. ,,y% 1063-t•-3-00-.02 PROPOSED AMINE L: r 2 4 1 9 I i __ fwat,a°""'"'t• _ a SYSTEM AREA ten. ct,.. —,a . ern SAW 7i Voila w• (SEE awe cm i �7 • Ca. . rmvca vilit s• rtu Ilizz t ::`.ri: ; a0 II, r; ; • . • A A tt' .xv. swat cv. rv+r.. t oata� •e «,u a•s{�vrc rota taut V 01 v (E) CROSSROADS ' � •.•c `'z—'' ;0 ,�; - a . FACILITY i •.c' •o• . � tin • S[r■K► �� ' -- ca ao•4.4ot / ■ tur tt,.c•.•. .� W C R .. n rorvrir/a. 1.rM 80' ROW 44 : `r.'�`� co eat ortw.cc r/ Cal wets Oa tot, ter 19 — • vcunirr MAP WC R. 44 (RUB R.O. ►1 , i 4R, Page 1.1, Reception v1 S'Rn ! , rd puma. • ::.-.34.Rook I AGPROt-: I, ',,l ( 1a DEN 15 Proposed Roadway Improvements: More than adequate for the PUD - Exceeds CDOT standards, State Highway Access Code Standards, County Access Spacing WIN Requirements and meets Fire District Requirements Access cannot be moved any further west - Request: - 964' spacing be allowed for access - (ROW for internal private drive to abut gas line easements on western boundary) - No ROW reservation for future flyover SB Left -Turn Lane & SB Right -Turn Lane at Site Access: (140 Full Width, 90. Bay Taper, 125' Redirect Taper) 16 Hello