The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20194020.tiffH dro eologic Characterization December 2016 North Weld Landfill Unit APPENDIX D LABORATORY TESTING RESULTS - GROUNDWATER AND RIG WATER 152047 FINAL Water Quality Results May 3and 4,2016 TestAmerica THE LEADER IN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING ANALYTICAL REPORT Job Number: 280-82795-1 Job Description: 588 North Weld For: Waste Management 2400 West Union Avenue Englewood, CO 80110 Attention: Mr. Tom Schweitzer Betsy A Sara, Project Manager II 4955 Yarrow Street, Arvada, CO, 80002 (303)786-0189 betsy.sara@testamericainc.com 05/16/2016 cc: Mr. Eric DiEsposti Approved for release. Betsy A Sara Project Manager II 5/16/2016 1:47 PM The test results in this report relate only to the samples in this report and meet all requirements of NELAC, with any exceptions noted. Pursuant to NELAP, this report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of the laboratory. All questions regarding this report should be directed to the TestAmerica Denver Project Manager. The Lab Certification ID# is 4025. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size used, dilutions and moisture content if applicable. TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. TestAmerica Denver 4955 Yarrow Street, Arvada, CO 80002 Tel (303) 736-0100 Fax (303) 431-7171 www.testamericainc.com Page 1 of 98 05/16/2016 Table of Contents Cover Title Page 1 Report Narrative 3 Executive Summary 4 Method Summary 9 Method / Analyst Summary 10 S ample Summary 11 Sample Results 12 S ample Datasheets 13 Data Qualifiers 59 QC Results 60 Qc Association Summary 61 S urrogate Recovery Report 65 Qc Reports 66 Laboratory Chronicle 83 Client Chain of Custody 89 S ample Receipt Checklist 98 Page 2 of 98 05/16/2016 CASE NARRATIVE Client: Waste Management Project: 588INorth Weld Report Number: 280-82795-1 With the exceptions noted as flags or footnotes, standard analytical protocols were followed in the analysis of the samples and no problems were encountered or anomalies observed. In addition all laboratory quality control samples were within established control limits, with any exceptions noted below. Each sample was analyzed to achieve the lowest possible reporting limit within the constraints of the method. In some cases, due to interference or analytes present at high concentrations, samples were diluted. For diluted samples, the reporting limits are adjusted relative to the dilution required. This report may include reporting limits (RLs) less than TestAmerica's standard reporting limit. The reported sample results and associated reporting limits are being used specifically to meet the needs of this project. Note that data are not normally reported to these levels without qualification because they are inherently less reliable and potentially less defensible than required by the latest industry standards. Sample Receiving The samples were received on 05/05/2016; the samples arrived in good condition, properly preserved and on ice. The temperature of the cooler at receipt was 4.5 C. Holding Times All holding times were within established control limits. Method Blanks All Method Blank samples were within established control limits. Laboratory Control Samples The Method 2320B LCS/LCSD exhibited RPD data outside the Q0 control limits for Total Alkalinity. Both the LOS and LCSD were recovered within QC control limits, demonstrating that the laboratory performed the method within acceptable guidelines; therefore, corrective action is deemed unnecessary. All other Laboratory Control Samples were within established control limits. Matrix Spike (MS) and Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD) All MS and MSD samples were within established control limits. Organics The Method 826DB surrogate recovery of 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 was above the upper control limit for samples TW-5 and Tw-D. Because the data are considered to be biased high and all target analytes in the sample were non -detect above the reporting limits, corrective action was deemed unnecessary. Page 3 of 98 05/16/2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - Detections Client: Waste Management Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Analyte Reporting Result Qualifier Limit Units Job Number: 280-82795-1 Method 280-82795-1 Tetrachloroethene Depth to water Field pH Field Conductivity Field Temperature Field Turbidity Field Dissolved Oxygen Field EH/ORP Chloride Sulfate Total Alkalinity Bicarbonate Alkalinity Dissolved Calcium Magnesi ur n Sodium TW-1 280-82795-2 TW-2 Depth to water Field pH Field Conductivity Field Temperature Field Turbidity Field Dissolved Oxygen Field EH/ORP Chloride Sulfate Total Alkalinity Bicarbonate Alkalinity Dissolved Calcium Magnesium Potassium Sodium 5.8 47.76 6.72 3856 13.1 286.0 30.0 179.0 160 1000 1200 1200 180000 430000 160000 128.04 7.00 3521 14.9 24.9 13.9 70.5 11 1900 530 530 390000 240000 11000 220000 5.0 0.50 5.0 10 10 5000 5000 5000 0.50 5.0 10 10 5000 5000 5000 5000 ug/L ft SU umhos/cm Degrees C NTU mg/L millivolts mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ft SU umhosicm Degrees C NTU mg/L millivolts mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L 8260E Field Sampling Field Sampling Field Sampling Field Sampling Field Sampling Field Sampling Field Sampling 300.0 300.0 SM 2320B SM 2320B 6010E 6010E 6010E Field Sampling Field Sampling Field Sampling Field Sampling Field Sampling Field Sampling Field Sampling 300.0 300.0 SM 2320B SM 2320B 6010E 6010E 6010E 6010E TestAmerica Denver Page 4 of 98 05/16/2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - Detections Client: Waste Management Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Analyte Reporting Result Qualifier Limit Units Job Number: 280-82795-1 Method 280-827954 TW-4 Depth to water Field pH Field Conductivity Field Temperature Field Turbidity Field Dissolved Oxygen Field EH/ORP Chloride Sulfate Total Alkalinity Bicarbonate Alkalinity Dissolved Calcium Magnesium Potassium Sodium 280-82795-4 TW-5 Depth to water Field pH Field Conductivity Field Temperature Field Turbidity Field Dissolved Oxygen Field EH/ORP Chloride Sulfate Total Alkalinity Bicarbonate Alkalinity Dissolved Calcium Magnesium Sodium 88.70 7.20 1385 15.3 15.9 10.6 -15.5 8.2 550 310 310 160000 97000 5100 34000 37.89 7.77 800 14.4 324.0 13.6 57.7 50 190 180 180 43000 53000 58000 0.50 5.0 10 10 5000 5000 5000 5000 0.50 5.0 10 10 5000 5000 5000 ft su umhoslcm Degrees C NTU mg/L millivolts mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ft SU umhos/cm Degrees C NTU mg/L millivolts mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L ug/L ug/L ug/L Field Sampling Field Sampling Field Sampling Field Sampling Field Sampling Field Sampling Field Sampling 300.0 300.0 SM 2320B SM 2320B 0010E 0010E 0010E 0010E Field Sampling Field Sampling Field Sampling Field Sampling Field Sampling Field Sampling Field Sampling 300.0 300.0 SM 2320B SM 2320B 6010E 0010E 0010E TestAmerica Denver Page 5 of 98 05/16/2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - Detections Client: Waste Management Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Analyte Reporting Result Qualifier Limit Units Job Number: 280-82795-1 Method 280-82795-5 TW-6 Chloroform Depth to water Field pH Field Conductivity Field Temperature Field Turbidity Field Dissolved Oxygen Field EH/ORP Chloride Sulfate Total Alkalinity Bicarbonate Alkalinity Dissolved Calcium Magnesium Potassium Sodium 280-82795-6 TW-8 Depth to water Field pH Field Conductivity Field Temperature Field Turbidity Field Dissolved Oxygen Field EH/ORP Chloride Sulfate Total Alkalinity Bicarbonate Alkalinity Dissolved Calcium Magnesium Potassium Sodium 6.4 50.59 8.25 454 16.8 108.0 7.4 -37.7 11 120 140 140 50000 25000 5800 29000 45.76 6.88 1426 16.8 416.0 9.2 45.3 11 290 520 520 160000 68000 7500 77000 5.0 0.50 5.0 10 10 5000 5000 5000 5000 0.50 5.0 10 10 5000 5000 5000 5000 ug/L ft SU umhos/cm Degrees C NTU mg/L millivolts mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ft SU umhos/cm Degrees C NTU mg/L millivolts mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L 8280E Field Sampling Field Sampling Field Sampling Field Sampling Field Sampling Field Sampling Field Sampling 300.0 300.0 SM 2320B SM 2320B 8010E 8010E 8010E 8010E Field Sampling Field Sampling Field Sampling Field Sampling Field Sampling Field Sampling Field Sampling 300.0 300.0 SM 2320B SM 2320B 8010E 8010E 8010E 8010E TestAmerica Denver Page 6 of 98 05/16/2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - Detections Client: Waste Management Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Analyte Reporting Result Qualifier Limit Units Job Number: 280-82795-1 Method 280-82795-7 TW-9 Depth to water Field pH Field Conductivity Field Temperature Field Turbidity Field Dissolved Oxygen Field EH/ORP Chloride Sulfate Total Alkalinity Bicarbonate Alkalinity Dissolved Calcium Magnesium Potassium Sodium 280-82795-8 TW-10 Depth to water Field pH Field Conductivity Field Temperature Field Turbidity Field Dissolved Oxygen Field EH/ORP Chloride Sulfate Total Alkalinity Bicarbonate Alkalinity Dissolved Calcium Magnesium Potassium Sodium 42.58 7.11 2202 15.9 39.5 15.3 18.8 64 340 310 310 190000 120000 9300 89000 56.33 6.31 4081 18.8 999.0 6.8 -17.0 24 2100 830 830 560000 280000 13000 160000 0.50 5.0 10 10 5000 5000 5000 5000 0.50 5.0 10 10 5000 5000 5000 5000 ft su umhoslcm Degrees C NTU mg/L millivolts mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ft SU umhos/cm Degrees C NTU mg/L millivolts mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L Field Sampling Field Sampling Field Sampling Field Sampling Field Sampling Field Sampling Field Sampling 300.0 300.0 SM 2320B SM 2320B 5010E 0010E 0010E 0010E Field Sampling Field Sampling Field Sampling Field Sampling Field Sampling Field Sampling Field Sampling 300.0 300.0 SM 2320B SM 2320B 6010E 0010E 0010E 0010E TestAmerica Denver Page 7 of 98 05/16/2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - Detections Client: Waste Management Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Analyte Reporting Result Qualifier Limit Units Job Number: 280-82795-1 Method 280-82795-9 TW-D Chloride Sulfate Total Alkalinity Bicarbonate Alkalinity Dissolved Calcium Magnesium Potassium Sodium 8.3 530 310 310 150000 ►4000 5000 33000 0.50 5.0 10 10 5000 5000 5000 5000 mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L 300.0 300.0 SM 2320B SM 2320B 6010E 5010E 6010E 5010E TestAmerica Denver Page 8 of 98 05/16/2016 METHOD SUMMARY Client: Waste Management Description Lab Location Method Job Number: 280-82795-1 Preparation Method Matrix: Water Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Purge and Trap Metals (ICP) Preparation, Total Recoverable or Dissolved Metals Sample Filtration, Field Anions, Ion Chromatography Alkalinity Field Sampling Lab References: TAL DEN = TestAmerica Denver TAL DEN TAL DEN TAL DEN TAL DEN TAL DEN TAL DEN TAL DEN SW846 8260E SW846 5030B SW846 6010E SW846 3005A FIELD FLTRD MCAWW 300.0 SM SM 2320E EPA Field Sampling Method References: EPA = US Environmental Protection Agency MCAWW = "Methods For Chemical Analysis Of Water And Wastes", EPA -600/4-79-020, March 1983 And Subsequent Revisions. SM = "Standard Methods For The Examination Of Water And Wastewater" SW846 = "Test Methods For Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods", Third Edition, November 1986 And Its Updates. TestArnerica Denver Page 9 of 98 05/16/2016 METHOD / ANALYST SUMMARY Client: Waste Management Method SW846 826DB SW846 6010E EPA Field Sampling MCAWW L ■ 7 300.0 SM SM 2320E Analyst Lines, Jeremy N Scott, Samantha J Saetia, Kriangsak 1 Benson, Alex F Uge, Ikem E Job Number 280-82795-1 Analyst ID MAL SJs KIS AFB IEU TestAmerica Denver Page 10 of 98 05/16/2016 SAMPLE SUMMARY Client: Waste Management Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Client Matrix Job Number: 280-82795-1 Date/Ti me Sampled Date/Time Received 280-82795-1 280-82795-2 280-82795-3 280-82795-4 280-82795-5 280-82795-6 280-82795-7 280-82795-8 280-82795-9 280-82795-10 TVV-1 TW-2 TW-4 TW-5 TW-6 TW-8 TW-9 TW-10 TW-D TRIP BLANK Water Water Water Water Water Wate r Water Wate r Water Water 05/04/2016 0815 05/03/2016 1325 05/03/2016 1510 05/03/2016 1800 05/03/2016 1705 05/04/2016 0955 05/04/2016 1640 05104/2015 1540 05/03/2016 1100 05/03/2016 1000 05/05/2016 1300 05/05/2016 1300 05/05/2016 1300 05/05/2016 1300 05/05/2016 1300 05/05/2016 1300 05/05/2016 1300 05/05/2016 1300 05/05/2016 1300 05/05/2016 1300 TestArnerica Denver Page 11 of 98 05/16/2016 SAMPLE RESULTS TestArnerica Denver Page 12 of 98 05/16/2016 Analytical Data Client: Waste Management Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Analysis Method: Prep Method: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: TWA 280-82795-1 Water 8250E 5030E 1.0 05/14/2016 0138 05/14/2016 0138 Analyte 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 1,1,1 -Trish loroetha ne 1,1,2,2-Tetrach loroethane 1,1,2 -Trish loroetha ne 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethene 1, 2,3-Trich loropropa ne 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1,2-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloropropane 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2-Butanone (MEK) 2-Hexanone 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (M IBK) Acetone Acrylonitrile Benzene Bromochloromethane Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chlorodi bromomethane Chloroethane chloroform Chloromethane cis-1,2-Dichloroethene cis-1,3-Dichloropropene Dibromomethane Ethylbenzene lodonmethane Methylene Chloride Styrene Tetrachloroethene Toluene trans-1,2-Dichloroethene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene Trichloroethene Trich to rof luorometha ne Vinyl acetate Vinyl chloride Xylenes (total) 8260E Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Analysis Batch: 280-325289 Prep Batch: N/A Result (ucg/L) ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.8 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Job Number: 280-82795-1 Date Sampled: 05/04/2016 0815 Date Received: 05/05/2016 1300 Instrument ID: Lab File ID: Initial Weight/Volume: Final Weight/Volume: Qualifier VMS_MS9 M S9_4722 . D 20 mL 20 mL RL 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10 10 5.0 5.0 10 50 10 10 34 100 5.0 10 5.0 5.0 10 5.0 5.0 5,0 5.0 10 5.0 10 10 5.0 10 5.0 10 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10 5.0 10 5.0 10 10 1.0 10 TestAmerica Denver Page 13 of 98 05/16/2016 Analytical Data Client: Waste Management Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Analysis Method: Prep Method: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: TWA 280-82795-1 Water 8250E 5030E 1,0 05/14/2016 0138 05/14/2016 0138 Surrogate 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Suer) Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) Toluene -d8 (Surr) 8260B Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Analysis Batch: 280-325289 Prep Batch: N/A %Rec 117 103 110 103 Job Number: 280-82795-1 Date Sampled: 05/04/2016 0815 Date Received: 05/05/2016 1300 Instrument ID: Lab File ID: Initial Weight/Volume: Final Weight/Volume: Qualifier VMS_MS9 M S9_4722 . D 20 mL 20 mL Acceptance Limits 70- 127 78-120 77 - 120 80- 125 TestAmerica Denver Page 14 of 98 05/16/2016 Analytical Data Client: Waste Management Client Sample ID: TW-2 Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Analysis Method: Prep Method: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: 280-82795-2 Water 8250E 5030E 1.0 05/14/2016 0159 05/14/2016 0159 Analyte 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 1,1,1 -Trish loroetha ne 1,1,2,2-Tetrach loroethane 1,1,2 -Trish loroetha ne 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethene 1, 2,3-Trich loropropa ne 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1,2-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloropropane 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2-Butanone (MEK) 2-Hexanone 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (M IBK) Acetone Acrylonitrile Benzene Bromochloromethane Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chlorodi bromomethane Chloroethane chloroform Chloromethane cis-1,2-Dichloroethene cis-1,3-Dichloropropene Dibromomethane Ethylbenzene lodonmethane Methylene Chloride Styrene Tetrachloroethene Toluene trans-1,2-Dichloroethene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene Trichloroethene Trich to rof luorometha ne Vinyl acetate Vinyl chloride Xylenes (total) 8260E Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Analysis Batch: 280-325289 Prep Batch: N/A Result (ucg/L) ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Job Number: 280-82795-1 Date Sampled: 05/03/2016 1325 Date Received: 05/05/2016 1300 Instrument ID: Lab File ID: Initial Weight/Volume: Final Weight/Volume: Qualifier VM_MS9 MS9_4723.D 20 mL 20 mL RL 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10 10 5.0 5.0 10 50 10 10 34 100 5.0 10 5.0 5.0 10 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10 5.0 10 10 5.0 10 5.0 10 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10 5.0 10 5.0 10 10 1.0 10 TestAmerica Denver Page 15 of 98 05/16/2016 Analytical Data Client: Waste Management Client Sample ID: TW-2 Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Analysis Method: Prep Method: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: 280-82795-2 Water 8250E 5030E 1,0 05/14/2016 0159 05/14/2016 0159 Surrogate 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Suer) Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) Toluene -d8 (Surr) 8260B Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Analysis Batch: 280-325289 Prep Batch: N/A %Rec 118 100 108 101 Job Number: 280-82795-1 Date Sampled: 05/03/2016 1325 Date Received: 05/05/2016 1300 Instrument ID: Lab File ID: Initial Weight/Volume: Final Weight/Volume: Qualifier VMS_MS9 MS9_4723.D 20 mL 20 mL Acceptance Limits 70-127 78-120 77 - 120 80- 125 TestAmerica Denver Page 16 of 98 05/16/2016 Analytical Data Client: Waste Management Client Sample ID: TW-4 Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Analysis Method: Prep Method: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: 280-82795-3 Water 8250E 5030E 1.0 05/14/2016 0220 05/14/2016 0220 Analyte 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 1,1,1 -Trish loroetha ne 1,1,2,2-Tetrach loroethane 1,1,2 -Trish loroetha ne 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethene 1, 2,3-Trich loropropa ne 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1,2-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloropropane 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2-Butanone (MEK) 2-Hexanone 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (M IBK) Acetone Acrylonitrile Benzene Bromochloromethane Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chlorodi bromomethane Chloroethane chloroform Chloromethane cis-1,2-Dichloroethene cis-1,3-Dichloropropene Dibromomethane Ethylbenzene lodomethane Methylene Chloride Styrene Tetrachloroethene Toluene trans-1,2-Dichloroethene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene Trichloroethene Trich to rof luorometha ne Vinyl acetate Vinyl chloride Xylenes (total) 8260E Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Analysis Batch: 280-325289 Prep Batch: N/A Result (ugh.) ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Job Number: 280-82795-1 Date Sampled: 05103/2015 1510 Date Received: 05/05/2016 1300 Instrument ID: Lab File ID: InitialWeight/Volume: Final Weight/Volume: Qualifier VM_MS9 MS9_4724.D 20 mL 20 mL RL 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10 10 5.0 5.0 10 50 10 10 34 100 5.0 10 5.0 5.0 10 5.0 5.0 5,0 5.0 10 5.0 10 10 5.0 10 5.0 10 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10 5.0 10 5.0 10 10 1.0 10 TestAmerica Denver Page 17 of 98 05/16/2016 Analytical Data Client: Waste Management Client Sample ID: TW-4 Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Analysis Method: Prep Method: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: 280-82795-3 Water 8250E 5030E 1,0 05/14/2016 0220 05/14/2016 0220 Surrogate 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Suer) Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) Toluene -d8 (Surr) 8260B Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Analysis Batch: 280-325289 Prep Batch: N/A %Rec Job Number: 280-82795-1 Date Sampled: 05103/2015 1510 Date Received: 05/05/2016 1300 Instrument ID: Lab File ID: InitialWeight/Volume: Final Weight/Volume: Qualifier VMS_MS9 MS9_4724.D . D 20 mL 20 mL Acceptance Limits 114 100 106 102 70-127 78-120 77 - 120 80- 125 TestAmerica Denver Page 18 of 98 05/16/2016 Analytical Data Client: Waste Management Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Analysis Method: Prep Method: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: TV's -5 280-82795-4 Water 8250E 5030E 1.0 05/14/2016 0516 05/14/2016 0516 Analyte 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 1,1,1 -Trish loroetha ne 1,1,2,2-Tetrach loroethane 1,1,2 -Trish loroetha ne 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethene 1, 2,3-Trich loropropa ne 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1,2-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloropropane 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2-Butanone (MEK) 2-Hexanone 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (M IBK) Acetone Acrylonitrile Benzene Bromochloromethane Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chlorodi bromomethane Chloroethane chloroform Chloromethane cis-1,2-Dichloroethene cis-1,3-Dichloropropene Dibromomethane Ethylbenzene lodomethane Methylene Chloride Styrene Tetrachloroethene Toluene trans-1,2-Dichloroethene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene Trichloroethene Trich to rof luorometha ne Vinyl acetate Vinyl chloride Xylenes (total) 8260E Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Analysis Batch: 280-325289 Prep Batch: N/A Result (ucg/L) ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Job Number: 280-82795-1 Date Sampled: 05/03/2016 1800 Date Received: 05/05/2016 1300 Instrument ID: Lab File ID: Initial Weight/Volume: Final Weight/Volume: Qualifier VMS_MS9 M S9_4725.D 20 mL 20 mL RL 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10 10 5.0 5.0 10 50 10 10 34 100 5.0 10 5.0 5.0 10 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10 5.0 10 10 5.0 10 5.0 10 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10 5.0 10 5.0 10 10 1.0 10 TestAmerica Denver Page 19 of 98 05/16/2016 Analytical Data Client: Waste Management Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Analysis Method: Prep Method: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: TV's -5 280-82795-4 Water 8250E 5030E 1,0 05/14/2016 0516 05/14/2016 0516 Surrogate 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Suer) Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) Toluene -d8 (Surr) 8260B Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Analysis Batch: 280-325289 Prep Batch: N/A %Rec 129 104 113 102 Job Number: 280-82795-1 Date Sampled: 05/03/2016 1800 Date Received: 05/05/2016 1300 Instrument ID: Lab File ID: Initial Weight/Volume: Final Weight/Volume: Qualifier X VMS_MS9 M S9_4725.D 20 mL 20 mL Acceptance Limits 70-127 78-120 77 - 120 80- 125 TestAmerica Denver Page 20 of 98 05/16/2016 Analytical Data Client: Waste Management Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Analysis Method: Prep Method: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: TW-6 280-82795-5 Water 8250E 5030E 1,0 05/14/2016 0537 05/14/2016 0537 Analyte 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 1,1,1 -Trish loroetha ne 1,1,2,2-Tetrach loroethane 1,1,2 -Trish loroetha ne 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethene 1, 2,3-Trich loropropa ne 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1,2-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloropropane 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2-Butanone (MEK) 2-Hexanone 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (M IBK) Acetone Acrylonitrile Benzene Bromochloromethane Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chlorodi bromomethane Chloroethane chloroform Chloromethane cis-1,2-Dichloroethene cis-1,3-Dichloropropene Dibromomethane Ethylbenzene lodonmethane Methylene Chloride Styrene Tetrachloroethene Toluene trans-1,2-Dichloroethene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene Trichloroethene Trich to rof luorometha ne Vinyl acetate Vinyl chloride Xylenes (total) 8260E Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Analysis Batch: 280-325289 Prep Batch: N/A Result (ucg/L) ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 6.4 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Job Number: 280-82795-1 Date Sampled: 05/03/2016 1705 Date Received: 05/05/2016 1300 Instrument ID: Lab File ID: Initial Weight/Volume: Final Weight/Volume: Qualifier VM_M S9 MS9_4726.D 4728 . D 20 mL 20 mL RL 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10 10 5.0 5.0 10 50 10 10 34 100 5.0 10 5.0 5.0 10 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10 5.0 10 10 5.0 10 5.0 10 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10 5.0 10 5.0 10 10 1.0 10 TestAmerica Denver Page 21 of 98 05/16/2016 Analytical Data Client: Waste Management Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Analysis Method: Prep Method: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: TW-6 280-82795-5 Water 8250E 5030E 1,0 05/14/2016 0537 05/14/2016 0537 Surrogate 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Suer) Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) Toluene -d8 (Surr) 8260B Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Analysis Batch: 280-325289 Prep Batch: N/A %Rec Job Number: 280-82795-1 Date Sampled: 05/03/2016 1705 Date Received: 05/05/2016 1300 Instrument ID: Lab File ID: Initial Weight/Volume: Final Weight/Volume: Qualifier VMS_M S9 MS9_4726.D 4728 . D 20 mL 20 mL Acceptance Limits 121 102 113 104 70-127 78-120 77 - 120 80- 125 TestAmerica Denver Page 22 of 98 05/16/2016 Analytical Data Client: Waste Management Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Analysis Method: Prep Method: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: TV's -8 280-82795-6 Water 8260E 5030E 1,0 05/14/2016 0558 05/14/2016 0558 Analyte 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 1,1,1 -Trish loroetha ne 1,1,2,2-Tetrach loroethane 1,1,2 -Trish loroetha ne 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethene 1, 2,3-Trich loropropa ne 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1,2-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloropropane 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2-Butanone (MEK) 2-Hexanone 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (M IBK) Acetone Acrylonitrile Benzene Bromochloromethane Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromo metha ne Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chlorodi bromomethane Chloroethane chloroform Chloromethane cis-1,2-Dichloroethene cis-1,3-Dichloropropene Dibromomethane Ethylbenzene lodomethane Methylene Chloride Styrene Tetrachloroethene Toluene trans-1,2-Dichloroethene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene Trichloroethene Trich to rof luorometha ne Vinyl acetate Vinyl chloride Xylenes (total) 8260E Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Analysis Batch: 280-325289 Prep Batch: N/A Result (ucg/L) ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Job Number: 280-82795-1 Date Sampled: 05/04/2016 0955 Date Received: 05105/2016 1300 Instrument ID: Lab File ID: Initial Weight/Volume: Final Weight/Volume: Qualifier VM_MS9 M S9_4727.D 20 mL 20 mL RL 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10 10 5.0 5.0 10 50 10 10 34 100 5.0 10 5.0 5.0 10 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10 5.0 10 10 5.0 10 5.0 10 5.0 5.0 5.0 5,0 10 5.0 10 5.0 10 10 1.0 10 TestAmerica Denver Page 23 of 98 05/16/2016 Analytical Data Client: Waste Management Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Analysis Method: Prep Method: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: TV's -8 280-82795-6 Water 8260E 5030E 1,0 05/14/2016 0558 05/14/2016 0558 Surrogate 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Suer) Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) Toluene -d8 (Surr) 8260B Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Analysis Batch: 280-325289 Prep Batch: N/A %Rec Job Number: 280-82795-1 Date Sampled: 05/04/2016 0955 Date Received: 05105/2016 1300 Instrument ID: Lab File ID: Initial Weight/Volume: Final Weight/Volume: Qualifier VMS_MS9 M S9_4727.D 20 mL 20 mL Acceptance Limits 116 96 107 97 70-127 78-120 77 - 120 80- 125 TestAmerica Denver Page 24 of 98 05/16/2016 Analytical Data Client: Waste Management Client Sample ID: TW-9 Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Analysis Method: Prep Method: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: 280-82795-7 Water 8250E 5030E 1.0 05/14/2016 0619 05/14/2016 0619 Analyte 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 1,1,1 -Trish loroetha ne 1,1,2,2-Tetrach loroethane 1,1,2 -Trish loroetha ne 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethene 1, 2,3-Trich loropropa ne 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1,2-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloropropane 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2-Butanone (MEK) 2-Hexanone 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (M IBK) Acetone Acrylonitrile Benzene Bromochloromethane Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chlorodi bromomethane Chloroethane chloroform Chloromethane cis-1,2-Dichloroethene cis-1,3-Dichloropropene Dibromomethane Ethylbenzene lodomethane Methylene Chloride Styrene Tetrachloroethene Toluene trans-1,2-Dichloroethene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene Trichloroethene Trich to rof luorometha ne Vinyl acetate Vinyl chloride Xylenes (total) 8260E Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Analysis Batch: 280-325289 Prep Batch: N/A Result (ug/L) ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Job Number: 280-82795-1 Date Sampled: 05/04/2016 1640 Date Received: 05/05/2015 1300 Instrument ID: Lab File ID: Initial Weight/Volume: Final Weight/Volume: Qualifier VM_MS9 MS9_4728.D 20 mL 20 mL RL 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10 10 5.0 5.0 10 50 10 10 34 100 5.0 10 5.0 5.0 10 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10 5.0 10 10 5.0 10 5.0 10 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10 5.0 10 5.0 10 10 1.0 10 TestAmerica Denver Page 25 of 98 05/16/2016 Analytical Data Client: Waste Management Client Sample ID: TW-9 Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Analysis Method: Prep Method: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: 280-82795-7 Water 8250E 5030E 1,0 05/14/2016 0619 05/14/2016 0619 Surrogate 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Suer) Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) Toluene -d8 (Surr) 8260B Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Analysis Batch: 280-325289 Prep Batch: N/A %Rec Job Number: 280-82795-1 Date Sampled: 05/04/2016 1640 Date Received: 05/05/2016 1300 Instrument ID: Lab File ID: Initial Weight/Volume: Final Weight/Volume: Qualifier VMS_M S9 MS9_4728.D 20 mL 20 mL Acceptance Limits 121 97 112 100 70-127 78-120 77 - 120 80- 125 TestAmerica Denver Page 26 of 98 05/16/2016 Analytical Data Client: Waste Management Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Analysis Method: Prep Method: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: TW-1O 280-82795-8 Water 8250E 5030E 1.0 05/14/2016 0640 05/14/2016 0640 Analyte 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 1,1,1 -Trish loroetha ne 1,1,2,2-Tetrach loroethane 1,1,2 -Trish loroetha ne 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethene 1, 2,3-Trich loropropa ne 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1,2-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloropropane 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2-Butanone (MEK) 2-Hexanone 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (M IBK) Acetone Acrylonitrile Benzene Bromochloromethane Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chlorodi bromomethane Chloroethane chloroform Chloromethane cis-1,2-Dichloroethene cis-1,3-Dichloropropene Dibromomethane Ethylbenzene lodonmethane Methylene Chloride Styrene Tetrachloroethene Toluene trans-1,2-Dichloroethene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene Trichloroethene Trich to rof luorometha ne Vinyl acetate Vinyl chloride Xylenes (total) 8280E Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Analysis Batch: 280-325289 Prep Batch: N/A Result (ucg/L) ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Job Number: 280-82795-1 Date Sampled: 05/04/2016 1540 Date Received: 05105/2015 130O Instrument ID: Lab File ID: Initial Weight/Volume: Final Weight/Volume: Qualifier VM_MS9 MS9_4729.D 20 mL 20 mL RL 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10 10 5.0 5.0 10 50 10 10 34 100 5.0 10 5.0 5.0 10 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10 5.0 10 10 5.0 10 5.0 10 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10 5.0 10 5.0 10 10 1.0 10 TestAmerica Denver Page 27 of 98 05/16/2016 Analytical Data Client: Waste Management Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Analysis Method: Prep Method: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: TW-10 280-82795-8 Water 8250E 5030E 1,0 05/14/2016 0640 05/14/2016 0640 Surrogate 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Suer) Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) Toluene -d8 (Surr) 8260B Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Analysis Batch: 280-325289 Prep Batch: N/A %Rec 127 102 119 106 Job Number: 280-82795-1 Date Sampled: 05/04/2016 1540 Date Received: 05/05/2016 1300 Instrument ID: Lab File ID: Initial Weight/Volume: Final Weight/Volume: Qualifier V MS_M S9 MS9_4729.D 20 mL 20 mL Acceptance Limits 70-127 78-120 77 - 120 80- 125 TestAmerica Denver Page 28 of 98 05/16/2016 Analytical Data Client: Waste Management Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Analysis Method: Prep Method: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: TW-D 280-82795-9 Water 8250E 5030E 1.0 05/14/2016 0701 05/14/2016 0701 Analyte 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 1,1,1 -Trish loroetha ne 1,1,2,2-Tetrach loroethane 1,1,2 -Trish loroetha ne 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethene 1, 2,3-Trich loropropa ne 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1,2-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloropropane 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2-Butanone (MEK) 2-Hexanone 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (M IBK) Acetone Acrylonitrile Benzene Bromochloromethane Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chlorodi bromomethane Chloroethane chloroform Chloromethane cis-1,2-Dichloroethene cis-1,3-Dichloropropene Dibromomethane Ethylbenzene lodormethane Methylene Chloride Styrene Tetrachloroethene Toluene trans-1,2-Dichloroethene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene Trichloroethene Trich to rof luorometha ne Vinyl acetate Vinyl chloride Xylenes (total) 8260E Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Analysis Batch: 280-325289 Prep Batch: N/A Result (ug1L) ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Job Number: 280-82795-1 Date Sampled: 05/03/2016 1100 Date Received: 05/05/2016 1300 Instrument ID: Lab File ID: Initial Weight/Volume: Final Weight/Volume: Qualifier VM _MS9 MS9_4730.D 20 mL 20 mL RL 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10 10 5.0 5.0 10 50 10 10 34 100 5.0 10 5.0 5.0 10 5.0 5.0 5,0 5.0 10 5.0 10 10 5.0 10 5.0 10 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10 5.0 10 5.0 10 10 1.0 10 TestAmerica Denver Page 29 of 98 05/16/2016 Analytical Data Client: Waste Management Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Analysis Method: Prep Method: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: TW-D 280-82795-9 Water 8250E 5030E 1,0 05/14/2016 0701 05/14/2016 0701 Surrogate 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Suer) Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) Toluene -d8 (Surr) 8260B Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Analysis Batch: 280-325289 Prep Batch: N/A %Rec 130 103 116 106 Job Number: 280-82795-1 Date Sampled: 05/03/2016 1100 Date Received: 05/05/2016 1300 Instrument ID: Lab File ID: Initial Weight/Volume: Final Weight/Volume: Qualifier X VMS_MS9 MS9_4730,D 20 mL 20 mL Acceptance Limits 70-127 78-120 77 - 120 80- 125 TestAmerica Denver Page 30 of 98 05/16/2016 Analytical Data Client: Waste Management Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Analysis Method: Prep Method: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: TRIP BLANK 280-82795-10 Water 8250E 5030E 1,0 05/15/2016 2137 05/15/2016 2137 Analyte 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 1,1,1 -Trish loroetha ne 1,1,2,2-Tetrach loroethane 1,1,2 -Trish loroetha ne 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethene 1, 2,3 -Trish loropropa ne 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1,2-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloropropane 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2-Butanone (IUIEK) 2-Hexanone 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (M IBK) Acetone Acrylonitrile Benzene Bromochloromethane Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chlorodi bromomethane Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane cis-1,2-Dichloroethene cis-1,3-Dichloropropene Dibromomethane Ethylbenzene lodomethane Methylene Chloride Styrene Tetrachloroethene Toluene trans-1,2-Dichloroethene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene Trichloroethene Trich to rof luorometha ne Vinyl acetate Vinyl chloride Xylenes (total) 8260B Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Analysis Batch: 280-325349 Prep Batch: N/A Result (ug/L) ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Job Number: 280-82795-1 Date Sampled: 05103/2016 1000 Date Received: 05/05/2016 1300 Instrument ID: Lab File ID: InitialWeight/Volume: Final Weight/Volume: Qualifier VMB_R1 R2692.D 20 mL 20 mL RL 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10 10 5.0 5.0 10 50 10 10 34 100 5.0 10 5.0 5.0 10 5.0 5.0 5,0 5,0 10 5.0 10 10 5.0 10 5.0 10 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10 5.0 10 5.0 10 10 1.0 10 TestAmerica Denver Page 31 of 98 05/16/2016 Analytical Data Client: Waste Management Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Analysis Method: Prep Method: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: TRIP BLANK 280-82795-10 Water 8260B 5030E 1.0 05/15/2016 2137 05/15/2016 2137 Surrogate 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) Toluene -d8 (Surr) 8260E Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Analysis Batch: 280-325349 Prep Batch: N/A °3Rec 104 86 106 100 Job Number: 280-82795-1 Date Sampled: 05/03/2016 1000 Date Received: 05/05/2016 1300 Instrument ID: Lab File ID: Initial Weight/Volume: Final Weight/Volume: Qualifier VM S_R 1 R2692.D D 20 mL 20 mL Acceptance Limits 70- 127 78- 120 77-120 80 - 125 TestAmerica Denver Page 32 of 98 05/16/2016 Analytical Data Client: Waste Management Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Analysis Method: Prep Method: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: Analyte Calcium Magnesium Potassium Sodium TWA 280-82795-1 Water 6010E 3005A 1,0 05/09/2010 2337 05/09/2016 0805 601 OB Metals (ICP)-Dissolved olve d Analysis Batch: 280-324565 Prep Batch: 280-324196 Result (ug/L) 180000 430000 ND 160000 Job Number: 280-82795-1 Date Sampled: 05/04/2016 0815 Date Received: 05/05/2016 1300 Instrument ID: Lab File ID: Initial Weight/Volume: Final Weight/Volume: Qualifier MT_026 26a050916c.asc 50 mL 50 mL RL 5000 5000 5000 5000 TestAmerica Denver Page 33 of 98 05/16/2016 Analytical Data Client: Waste Management Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Analysis Method: Prep Method: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: Analyte Calcium Magnesium Potassium Sodium TW-2 280-82795-2 Water 6010E 3005A 1.0 05/09/2016 2348 05/09/2016 0805 6010E Metals (ICP)-Dissolved Analysis Batch: 280-324565 Prep Batch: 280-324196 Result (ug/L) 390000 240000 11000 220000 Job Number: 280-82795-1 Date Sampled: 05/03/2016 1325 Date Received: 05/05/2016 1300 Instrument ID: Lab File ID: Initial Weight/Volume: Final Weight/Volume: Qualifier MT 026 26a050916c.asc 50 mL 50 mL RL 5000 5000 5000 5000 TestAmerica Denver Page 34 of 98 05/16/2016 Analytical Data Client: Waste Management Client Sample ID: TW-4 Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Analysis Method: Prep Method: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: Analyte Calcium Magnesium Potassium Sodium 280-82795-3 Water 6010E 3005A 1,0 05/10/2016 0002 05/09/2016 0805 601 OB Metals (ICP)-Dissolved olve d Analysis Batch: 280-324565 Prep Batch: 280-324196 Result (ug/L) 160000 97000 5100 34000 Job Number: 280-82795-1 Date Sampled: 05/03/2016 1510 Date Received: 05/05/2016 1300 Instrument ID: Lab File ID: Initial Weight/Volume: Final Weight/Volume: Qualifier MT_026 26a050916c.asc 50 mL 50 mL RL 5000 5000 5000 5000 TestAmerica Denver Page 35 of 98 05/16/2016 Analytical Data Client: Waste Management Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Analysis Method: Prep Method: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: Analyte Calcium Magnesium Potassium Sodium TV's -5 280-82795-4 Water 6010E 3005A 1,0 05/10/2016 0005 05/09/2016 0805 601 OB Metals (ICP)-Dissolved olve d Analysis Batch: 280-324565 Prep Batch: 280-324196 Result (ug/L) 43000 53000 ND 58000 Job Number: 280-82795-1 Date Sampled: 05/03/2016 1800 Date Received: 05/05/2016 1300 Instrument ID: Lab File ID: Initial Weight/Volume: Final Weight/Volume: Qualifier MT_026 26a050916c.asc 50 mL 50 mL RL 5000 5000 5000 5000 TestAmerica Denver Page 36 of 98 05/16/2016 Analytical Data Client: Waste Management Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Analysis Method: Prep Method: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: Analyte Calcium Magnesium Potassium Sodium TW-6 280-82795-5 Water 6010E 3005A 1,0 05/10/2016 0007 05/09/2016 0805 601 OB Metals (ICP)-Dissolved olve d Analysis Batch: 280-324565 Prep Batch: 280-324196 Result (ug/L) 50000 25000 5800 29000 Job Number: 280-82795-1 Date Sampled: 05/03/20161705 Date Received: 05/05/2016 1300 Instrument ID: Lab File ID: Initial Weight/Volume: Final Weight/Volume: Qualifier MT_026 26a050916c.asc 50 mL 50 mL RL 5000 5000 5000 5000 TestAmerica Denver Page 37 of 98 05/16/2016 Analytical Data Client: Waste Management Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Analysis Method: Prep Method: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: Analyte Calcium Magnesium Potassium Sodium TV's -8 280-82795-6 Water 6010E 3005A 1,0 05/10/2016 0010 05/09/2016 0805 601 OB Metals (ICP)-Dissolved olve d Analysis Batch: 280-324565 Prep Batch: 280-324196 Result (ug/L) 160000 68000 7500 77000 Job Number: 280-82795-1 Date Sampled: 05/04/2016 0955 Date Received: 05/05/2016 1300 Instrument ID: Lab File ID: Initial Weight/Volume: Final Weight/Volume: Qualifier MT_026 26a050916c.asc 50 mL 50 mL RL 5000 5000 5000 5000 TestAmerica Denver Page 38 of 98 05/16/2016 Analytical Data Client: Waste Management Client Sample ID: TW-9 Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Analysis Method: Prep Method: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: Analyte Calcium Magnesium Potassium Sodium 280-82795-7 Water 6010E 3005A 1,0 05/10/2016 0013 05/09/2016 0805 601 OB Metals (ICP)-Dissolved olve d Analysis Batch: 280-324565 Prep Batch: 280-324196 Result (ug/L) 190000 120000 9300 89000 Job Number: 280-82795-1 Date Sampled: 05/04120161640 Date Received: 05/05/2016 1300 Instrument ID: Lab File ID: Initial Weight/Volume: Final Weight/Volume: Qualifier MT_026 26a050916c.asc 50 mL 50 mL RL 5000 5000 5000 5000 TestAmerica Denver Page 39 of 98 05/16/2016 Analytical Data Client: Waste Management Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Analysis Method: Prep Method: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: Analyte Calcium Magnesium Potassium Sodium TW-10 280-82795-8 Water 6010E 3005A 1,0 05/10/2016 0016 05/09/2016 0805 601 OB Metals (ICP)-Dissolved olve d Analysis Batch: 280-324565 Prep Batch: 280-324196 Result OWL) 560000 280000 13000 160000 Job Number: 280-82795-1 Date Sampled: 05/04120161540 Date Received: 05/05/2016 1300 Instrument ID: Lab File ID: Initial Weight/Volume: Final Weight/Volume: Qualifier MT_026 26a050916c.asc 50 mL 50 mL RL 5000 5000 5000 5000 TestAmerica Denver Page 40 of 98 05/16/2016 Analytical Data Client: Waste Management Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Analysis Method: Prep Method: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: Analyte Calcium Magnesium Potassium Sodium TW-D 280-82795-9 Water 6010E 3005A 1,0 05/10/2016 0019 05/09/2016 0805 601 OB Metals (ICP)-Dissolved olve d Analysis Batch: 280-324565 Prep Batch: 280-324196 Result OWL) 150000 94000 5000 33000 Job Number: 280-82795-1 Date Sampled: 05/03/2016 1100 Date Received: 05/05/2016 1300 Instrument ID: Lab File ID: Initial Weight/Volume: Final Weight/Volume: Qualifier MT_026 26a050916c.asc 50 mL 50 mL RL 5000 5000 5000 5000 TestAmerica Denver Page 41 of 98 05/16/2016 Analytical Data Client: Waste Management Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: TW-1 280-82795-1 Water Analyte Result Chloride 160 Analysis Batch: 280-324600 Sulfate 1000 Analysis Batch: 280-324600 Total Alkalinity 1200 Analysis Batch: 280-324592 Bicarbonate Alkalinity 1200 Analysis Batch: 280-324592 Carbonate Alkalinity ND Analysis Batch: 280-324592 General Chemistry Qual Units Analysis Date: Analysis Date: Analysis Date: Analysis Date: Analysis Date: Job Number: 280-82795-1 Date Sampled: 05/04/2016 0815 Date Received: 05105/2010 1300 RL mg/L 05/10/2016 1506 mg/L 05/10/2016 2313 mg/L 05/09/2016 1752 mg/L 05/09/2016 1752 mg/L 05/09/2016 1752 0.50 5.0 10 10 10 Di! Method 1.0 300.0 10 300.0 1.0 8112320E 1.0 8112320E 1.0 8112320E TestAmerica Denver Page 42 of 98 05/16/2016 Analytical Data Client: Waste Management Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Analyte Chloride Sulfate Analysis Batch: Total Alkalinity Analysis Batch: Bicarbonate Alkalinity Analysis Batch: Carbonate Alkalinity Analysis Batch: T-2 280-82795-2 Water Result 11 Analysis Batch: 280-324600 1900 280-324600 530 280-324592 530 280-324592 ND 280-324592 General Chemistry Qual Units Analysis Date: Analysis Date: Analysis Date: Analysis Date: Analysis Date: Job Number: 280-82795-1 Date Sampled: 05/03/2016 1325 Date Received: 05/05/2016 1300 RL mg/L 05/10/2016 1523 mg/L 05/10/2016 2331 mg/L 05/09/2016 1758 mg/L 05/09/2016 1758 mg/L 05/09/2016 1758 0.50 5.0 10 10 10 Dil Method 1.0 300.0 20 300.0 1.0 SIV12320B 1.0 SIV12320B 1.0 SIV12320B TestAmerica Denver Page 43 of 98 05/16/2016 Analytical Data Client: Waste Management Client Sample ID: TW-4 Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Analyte Chloride 280-82795-3 Water Result Analysis Batch: Analysis Batch: Total Alkalinity Analysis Batch: Bicarbonate Alkalinity Analysis Batch: Carbonate Alkalinity Analysis Batch: Sulfate 8.2 280-324600 550 280-324600 310 280-324592 310 280-324592 ND 280-324592 General Chemistry Qual Units Analysis Date: Analysis Date: Analysis Date: Analysis Date: Analysis Date: Job Number: 280-82795-i Date Sampled: 05103/2016 1510 Date Received: 05/05/2016 1300 RL mg/L 05/10/2016 1541 mg/L 05/10/2016 2348 mg/L 05/09/2016 1803 mg/L 05/09/2016 1803 mg/L 05/09/2016 1803 0.50 5.0 10 10 10 Dil Method 1.0 300.0 10 300.0 1.0 SIM 2320E 1.0 SIM 2320E 1.0 SIM 2320E TestAmerica Denver Page 44 of 98 05/16/2016 Analytical Data Client: Waste Management Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Analyte Chloride Sulfate Analysis Batch: Total Alkalinity Analysis Batch: Bicarbonate Alkalinity Analysis Batch: Carbonate Alkalinity Analysis Batch: TW-5 280-82795-4 Water Result 50 Analysis Batch: 280-324600 190 280-324600 180 280-324592 180 280-324592 ND 280-324592 General Chemistry Qual Units Analysis Date: Analysis Date: Analysis Date: Analysis Date: Analysis Date: Job Number: 280-82795-1 Date Sampled: 05/03/2016 1800 Date Received: 05/05/2016 1300 RL mg/L 05/10/2016 1559 mg/L 05/10/2016 1559 mg/L 05/09/2016 1808 mg/L 05/09/2016 1808 mg/L 05/09/2016 1808 0.50 5.0 10 10 10 Dil Method 1.0 300.0 1.0 300.0 1.0 ail 2320B 1.0 ail 2320B 1.0 ail 2320B TestAmerica Denver Page 45 of 98 05/16/2016 Analytical Data Client: Waste Management Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: TW-6 280-82795-5 Water Analyte Result Chloride 11 Analysis Batch: 280-324600 Sulfate 120 Analysis Batch: 280-324600 Total Alkalinity 140 Analysis Batch: 280-324592 Bicarbonate Alkalinity 140 Analysis Batch: 280-324592 Carbonate Alkalinity ND Analysis Batch: 280-324592 General Chemistry Qual Units Analysis Date: Analysis Date: Analysis Date: Analysis Date: Analysis Date: Job Number: 280-82795-1 Date Sampled: 05/03/2016 1705 Date Received: 05/05/2016 1300 RL mg/L 05/10/2016 1616 mg/L 05/10/2016 1616 mg/L 05/09/2016 1813 mg/L 05/09/2016 1813 mg/L 05/09/2016 1813 0.50 5.0 10 10 10 Dil 1.0 1.0 Method 300.0 300.0 SM 2320B SM 2320B SM 2320B TestAmerica Denver Page 46 of 98 05/16/2016 Analytical Data Client: Waste Management Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: TW-8 280-82795-6 Water Analyte Result Chloride 11 Analysis Batch: 280-324600 Sulfate 290 Analysis Batch: 280-324600 Total Alkalinity 520 Analysis Batch: 280-324592 Bicarbonate Alkalinity 520 Analysis Batch: 280-324592 Carbonate Alkalinity ND Analysis Batch: 280-324592 General Chemistry Qual Units Analysis Date: Analysis Date: Analysis Date: Analysis Date: Analysis Date: Job Number: 280-82795-1 Date Sampled: 05/04/2016 0955 Date Received: 05/05/2016 1300 RL mg/L 05/10/2016 1710 mg/L 05/11/2016 0006 mg/L 05/09/2016 1827 mg/L 05/09/2016 1827 mg/L 05/09/2016 1827 0.50 5.0 10 10 10 Dil 1.0 5.0 Method 300.0 300.0 SM 2320B SM 2320B SM 2320B TestAmerica Denver Page 47 of 98 05/16/2016 Analytical Data Client: Waste Management Client Sample ID: TW-9 Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Analyte Chloride 280-82795-7 Water Result Analysis Batch: Analysis Batch: Total Alkalinity Analysis Batch: Bicarbonate Alkalinity Analysis Batch: Carbonate Alkalinity Analysis Batch: Sulfate 64 280-324600 340 280-324600 310 280-324592 310 280-324592 ND 280-324592 General Chemistry Qual Units Analysis Date: Analysis Date: Analysis Date: Analysis Date: Analysis Date: Job Number: 280-82795-1 Date Sampled: 05/04/2016 1640 Date Received: 05/05/2016 1300 RL mg/L 05/10/2016 1820 mg/L 05/11/2016 0152 mg/L 05/09/2016 1831 mg/L 05/09/2016 1831 mg/L 05/09/2016 1831 0.50 5.0 10 10 10 Dil 1.0 5.0 Method 300.0 300.0 SIV1 2320E SIV1 2320E SIV1 2320E TestAmerica Denver Page 48 of 98 05/16/2016 Analytical Data Client: Waste Management Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: TW-10 280-82795-8 Water Analyte Result Chloride 24 Analysis Batch: 280-324600 Sulfate 2100 Analysis Batch: 280-324600 Total Alkalinity 830 Analysis Batch: 280-324592 Bicarbonate Alkalinity 830 Analysis Batch: 280-324592 Carbonate Alkalinity ND Analysis Batch: 280-324592 General Chemistry Qual Units Analysis Date: Analysis Date: Analysis Date: Analysis Date: Analysis Date: Job Number: 280-82795-1 Date Sampled: 05/04/2016 1540 Date Received: 05/05/2016 1300 RL mg/L 05/10/2016 1838 mg/L 05/11/2016 0210 mg/L 05/09/2016 1837 mg/L 05/09/2016 1837 mg/L 05/09/2016 1837 0.50 5.0 10 10 10 Dil Method 1.0 300.0 20 300.0 SM 2320B SM 2320B SM 2320B TestAmerica Denver Page 49 of 98 05/16/2016 Analytical Data Client: Waste Management Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Analyte Chloride TW-D 280-82795-9 Water Result Analysis Batch: Analysis Batch: Total Alkalinity Analysis Batch: Bicarbonate Alkalinity Analysis Batch: Carbonate Alkalinity Analysis Batch: Sulfate 8.3 28O-3246OO 530 28O-3246OO 310 28O-324592 310 28O-324592 ND 28O-324592 General Chemistry Qual Units Analysis Date: Analysis Date: Analysis Date: Analysis Date: Analysis Date: Job Number: 280-82795-1 Date Sampled: 0510312016 1100 Date Received: 05/05/2016 1300 RL mg/L O5/1O/2016 1856 mg/L 05/11/2016 0228 mg/L O5/O9/2016 1842 mg/L O5/O9/2016 1842 mg/L O5/O9/2016 1842 0.50 5.0 10 10 10 Dil Method 1.0 300.0 5.0 300.0 1.0 ail 2320E 1.0 ail 2320E 1.0 ail 2320E TestAmerica Denver Page 50 of 98 05/16/2016 Analytical Data Client: Waste Management Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Analyte TW-1 280-82?06-1 Water Result Qual Units Field Service / Mobile Lab Dil Method Job Number: 280-82795-1 Date Sampled: 05/04/2016 0815 Date Received: 05/05/2016 1300 Analysis Batch Depth to water Field pH Field Conductivity Field Temperature Field Turbidity 47.76 6.72 3856 13.1 286.0 Field Dissolved Oxygen 30.0 Field EH/ORP 179.0 ft SU urnhos/cm Degrees C NTU mg/L millivolts 1.0 Field Sampling 1.0 Field Sampling 1.0 Field Sampling 1.0 Field Sampling 1.0 Field Sampling 1.0 Field Sampling 1.0 Field Sampling 280-324348 Date Analyzed Date Prepared 051'04/2016 0 815 280-324348 05/04/2016 0815 280-324348 05/04/2016 0815 280-324348 05/04/2016 0815 280-324348 05/04/2016 0815 280-324348 05/04/2016 0815 280-324348 05/04/2016 0815 TestAmerica Denver Page 51 of 98 05/16/2016 Analytical Data Client: Waste Management Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Analyte T-2 280-82795-2 Water Result Qual Units Field Service / Mobile Lab Dil Method Job Number: 280-82795-1 Date Sampled: 05103/2016132.5 Date Received: 05/05/2016 1300 Analysis Batch Date Analyzed Date Prepared Depth to water Field pH Field Conductivity Field Temperature Field Turbidity 128.04 7.00 3521 14.9 24.9 Field Dissolved Oxygen 13.9 Field EH/ORP 70.5 ft SU urnhos/cm Degrees C NTU mg/L millivolts 1.0 Field Sampling 1.0 Field Sampling 1.0 Field Sampling 1.0 Field Sampling 1.0 Field Sampling 1.0 Field Sampling 1.0 Field Sampling 280-324348 05 03/2016 1325 280-324348 05/03/2016 1325 280-324348 05/03/2016 1325 280-324348 05/03/2016 1325 280-324348 05/03/2016 1325 280-324348 05/03/2016 1325 280-324348 05/03/2016 1325 TestAmerica Denver Page 52 of 98 05/16/2016 Analytical Data Client: Waste Management Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Analyte TW-4 280-82795-3 Water Result Qual Units Field Service / Mobile Lab Dil Method Job Number: 280-82795-i Date Sampled: 0510312016 1510 Date Received: 05/05/2016 1300 Analysis Batch Date Analyzed Date Prepared Depth to water Field pH Field Conductivity Field Temperature Field Turbidity 88.70 7.20 1385 15.3 15.9 Field Dissolved Oxygen 10.6 Field EH/ORP -15.5 ft SU urnhcs/cm Degrees C NTU mg/L millivolts 1.0 Field Sampling 1.0 Field Sampling 1.0 Field Sampling 1.0 Field Sampling 1.0 Field Sampling 1.0 Field Sampling 1.0 Field Sampling 280-324348 05 03/2016 1510 280-324348 05/03/2016 1510 280-324348 05/03/2016 1510 280-324348 05/03/2016 1510 280-324348 05/03/2016 1510 280-324348 05/03/2016 1510 280-324348 05/03/2016 1510 TestAmerica Denver Page 53 of 98 05/16/2016 Analytical Data Client: Waste Management Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Analyte TW-5 280-82795-4 Water Result Qual Units Field Service / Mobile Lab Dil Method Job Number: 280-82795-1 Date Sampled: 05/03/2016 1800 Date Received: 05/05/2016 1300 Analysis Batch Date Analyzed Date Prepared Depth to water Field pH Field Conductivity Field Temperature Field Turbidity 37.89 7.77 800 14.4 324.0 Field Dissolved Oxygen 13.6 Field EH/ORP 57.7 ft SU urnhos/cm Degrees C NTU mg/L millivolts 1.0 Field Sampling 1.0 Field Sampling 1.0 Field Sampling 1.0 Field Sampling 1.0 Field Sampling 1.0 Field Sampling 1.0 Field Sampling 280-324348 05 03/2016 1800 280-324348 05/03/2016 1800 280-324348 05/03/2016 1800 280-324348 05/03/2016 1800 280-324348 05/03/2016 1800 280-324348 05/03/2016 1800 280-324348 05/03/2016 1800 TestAmerica Denver Page 54 of 98 05/16/2016 Analytical Data Client: Waste Management Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Analyte TW-6 280-82795-5 Water Depth to water Field pH Field Conductivity Field Temperature Field Turbidity Result 50.59 8.25 454 16.8 108.0 Field Dissolved Oxygen 7.4 Field EH/ORP -37.7 Qual Units Field Service / Mobile Lab Dil Method Job Number: 280-82795-1 Date Sampled: 05/03/2016 1705 Date Received: 05/05/2016 1300 Analysis Batch Date Analyzed Date Prepared ft SU urnhos/cm Degrees C NTU mg/L millivolts 1.0 Field Sampling 1.0 Field Sampling 1.0 Field Sampling 1.0 Field Sampling 1.0 Field Sampling 1.0 Field Sampling 1.0 Field Sampling 280-324348 05 03/2016 1 705 280-324348 05/03/2016 1705 280-324348 05/03/2016 1705 280-324348 05/03/2016 1705 280-324348 05/03/2016 1705 280-324348 05/03/2016 1705 280-324348 05/03/2016 1705 TestAmerica Denver Page 55 of 98 05/16/2016 Analytical Data Client: Waste Management Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Analyte TW-8 280-82795-6 Water Result Qual Units Field Service / Mobile Lab Dil Method Job Number: 280-82795-1 Date Sampled: 05/04/2016 0955 Date Received: 05/05/2016 1300 Analysis Batch Depth to water Field pH Field Conductivity Field Temperature Field Turbidity 45.76 6.88 1426 16.8 416.0 Field Dissolved Oxygen 9.2 Field BH1ORP 45.3 ft SU umhos/cm Degrees C NTU mg/L millivolts 1.0 Field Sampling 1.0 Field Sampling 1.0 Field Sampling 1.0 Field Sampling 1.0 Field Sampling 1.0 Field Sampling 1.0 Field Sampling 280-324348 Date Analyzed Date Prepared 051'04/2016 0955 280-324348 05/04/2016 0955 280-324348 05/04/2016 0955 280-324348 05/04/2016 0955 280-324348 05/04/2016 0955 280-324348 05/04/2016 0955 280-324348 05/04/2016 0955 TestAmerica Denver Page 56 of 98 05/16/2016 Analytical Data Client: Waste Management Client Sample ID: TW-9 Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: 280-82795-7 Water Analyte Result Depth to water 42.58 Field pH 7.11 Field Conductivity 2202 Field Temperature 15.9 Field Turbidity 39.5 Field Dissolved Oxygen 15.3 Field EH/ORP 18.8 Qual Units Field Service / Mobile Lab Dil Method Job Number: 280-82795-1 Date Sampled: 05/04/2016 1640 Date Received: 05/05/2016 1300 Analysis Batch Date Analyzed Date Prepared ft SU urnhos/cm Degrees C NTU mg/L millivolts 1.0 Field Sampling 1.0 Field Sampling 1.0 Field Sampling 1.0 Field Sampling 1.0 Field Sampling 1.0 Field Sampling 1.0 Field Sampling 280-324348 0510412016 1640 280-324348 05/04/2016 1640 280-324348 05/04/2016 1640 280-324348 05/04/2016 1640 280-324348 05/04/2016 1640 280-324348 05/04/2016 1640 280-324348 05/04/2016 1640 TestAmerica Denver Page 57 of 98 05/16/2016 Analytical Data Client: Waste Management Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Analyte Depth to water TW-10 280-82795-8 Water Result Qual Units Field Service / Mobile Lab Dil Method Job Number: 280-82795-1 Date Sampled: 05/04/2016 1540 Date Received: 05/05/2016 1300 Analysis Batch Date Analyzed Date Prepared 56.33 Field pH 6.31 Field Conductivity 4081 Field Temperature 18.8 Field Turbidity 999.0 Field Dissolved Oxygen 6.8 Field EH/ORP -17.0 ft SU urnhos/cm Degrees C NTU mg/L millivolts 1.0 Field Sampling 1.0 Field Sampling 1.0 Field Sampling 1.0 Field Sampling 1.0 Field Sampling 1.0 Field Sampling 1.0 Field Sampling 280-324348 0510412016 1540 280-324348 05/04/2016 1540 280-324348 05/04/2016 1540 280-324348 05/04/2016 1540 280-324348 05/04/2016 1540 280-324348 05/04/2016 1540 280-324348 05/04/2016 1540 TestAmerica Denver Page 58 of 98 05/16/2016 DATA REPORTING QUALIFIERS Client: Waste Management Job Number: 280-82795-1 Lab Section Qualifier Description GC/MS VOA J X Metals 4 General Chemistry Result is less than the RL but greater than or equal to the MDL and the concentration is an approximate value. Surrogate is outside control limits MS, MSD: The analyte present in the original sample is greater than 4 times the matrix spike concentration; therefore, control limits are not applicable. RPD of the LCS and LCSD exceeds the control limits TestAmerica Denver Page 59 of 98 05/16/2016 QUALITY CONTROL RESULTS TestAmerica Denver Page 60 of 98 05/16/2016 Quality Control Results Client: Waste Management QC Association Summary Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Job Number: 280-82795-1 Report Basis Client Matrix Method Prep Batch GC/MS VOA Analysis Batch:280-325289 LCS 280-325289/4 MB 280-325289/6 280-82718-X-1 MS 280-82718-X-1 MSD 280-82795-1 280-82795-2 280-82795-3 280-82795-4 280-82795-5 280-82795-6 280-82795-7 280-82795-8 280-82795-9 Analysis Batch:280-325349 LCS 280-325349/4 MB 280-325349/6 280-82795-10 280-82923-Y-3 MS 280-82.928-Y-3 M S D Report Basis T = Total TestAmerica Denver Lab Control Sample Method Blank Matrix Spike Matrix Spike Duplicate TW-1 TW-2 TW-4 TW-5 TW-6 TW-8 TW-9 TW-10 TW-D Lab Control Sample Method Blank TRIP BLANK Matrix Spike Matrix Spike Duplicate T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water 8280E 8280E 8280E 8250E 8280E 8280E 8280E 8280E 8280E 8280E 8280E 8280E 8280E 8260E 8260E 8260E 8260E 8250E Page 61 of 98 05/16/2016 Quality Control Results Client: Waste Management QC Association Summary Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Job Number: 280-82795-1 Report Basis Client Matrix Method Prep Batch Metals Prep Batch: 280-324196 LCS 280-324196/2-A MB 280-324196/1-A 280-82795-1 280-82795-1 MS 280-82795-1 MSD 280-82795-2 280-82795-3 280-82795-4 280-82795-5 280-82795-6 280-82795-7 280-82795-8 280-82795-9 Lab Control Sample Method Blank TW-1 Matrix Spike Matrix Spike Duplicate TW-2 TW-4 TW-5 TW-6 TW-8 TW-9 TW-10 TW-D Analysis Batch:280-324565 LCS 280-324196/2-A Lab Control Sample MB 280-324196/1-A Method Blank 280-82795-1 TW-1 280-82795-1 MS Matrix Spike 280-82795-1 MSD Matrix Spike Duplicate 280-82795-2 280-82795-3 280-82795-4 280-82795-5 280-82795-6 280-82795-7 280-82795-8 280-82795-9 Report Basis D = Dissolved R = Total Recoverable TestAmerica Denver TW-2 TW-4 TW-5 TW-6 TW-8 TW-9 TW-10 TW-D R R D D D D D D D D D D D R R D D D D D D D D D D D Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water 3005A 3005A 3005A 3005A 3005A 3005A 3005A 3005A 3005A 3005A 3005A 3005A 3005A 6010E 6010B 6010E 6010E 6010E 6010E 6010E 6010B 6010E 6010E 6010B 6010E 6010E 280-324196 280-324196 280-324196 280-324196 280-324196 280-324196 280-324196 280-324196 280-324196 280-324196 280-324196 280-324196 280-324196 Page 62 of 98 05/16/2016 Quality Control Results Client: Waste Management QC Association Summary Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Job Number: 280-82795-1 Report Basis Client Matrix Method Prep Batch Field Service / Mobile Lab Analysis Batch:280-324348 280-82795-1 280-82795-2 280-82795-3 280-82795-4 280-82795-5 280-82795-6 280-82795-7 280-82795-8 Report Basis T - Total TestAmerica Denver TW-1 TW-2 TW-4 TW-5 TW-6 TW-8 TW-9 TW-10 Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Field Field Field Field Field Field Field Field Sampling Sampling Sampling Sampling Sampling Sampling Sampling Sampling Page 63 of 98 05/16/2016 Quality Control Results Client: Waste Management QC Association Summary Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Job Number: 280-82795-1 Report Basis Client Matrix Method Prep Batch General Chemistry Analysis Batch:280-324592 LCS 280-324592/4 LCSD 280-324592/5 MB 280-324592/6 280-82458-A-26 DU 280-82795-1 280-82795-2 280-82795-3 280-82795-4 280-82795-5 280-82795-6 280-82795-7 280-82795-8 280-82795-9 Analysis Batch:280-324600 LCS 280-324600/4 LCSD 280-324600/5 MB 280-324600/6 280-82795-1 280-82795-2 280-82795-3 280-82795-4 280-82795-5 280-82795-6 280-82795-6DU 280-82795-6MS 280-82795-6M SD 280-82795-7 280-82795-8 280-82795-9 Report Basis T = Total TestAmerica Denver Lab Control Sample Lab Control Sample Duplicate Method Blank Duplicate TW-1 TW-2 TW-4 TW-5 TW-6 TW-8 TW-9 TW-10 TW-D Lab Control Sample Lab Control Sample Duplicate Method Blank TW-1 TW-2 TW-4 TW-5 TW-6 TW-8 Duplicate Matrix Spike Matrix Spike Duplicate TW-9 TW-10 TW-D T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Water SM 2320B SM 2320B SM 2320B SM 2320B SM 2320B SM 2320B SM 2320B SM 2320B SM 2320B SM 2320B SM 2320B SM 2320B SM 2320B 300.0 300.0 300.0 300.0 300.0 300.0 300.0 300.0 300.0 300.0 300.0 300.0 300.0 300.0 300.0 Page 64 of 98 05/16/2016 Quality Control Results Client: Waste Management Surrogate Recovery Report 8260E Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Client Matrix: Water Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID DCA BFB %Rec %Rec Job Number: 280-82795-1 DBFM TOL %Rec %Rec 280-82795-1 280-82795-2 280-82795-3 280-82795-4 280-82795-5 280-82795-6 280-82795-7 280-82795-8 280-82795-9 280-82795-10 MB 280-325289/6 MB 280-325349/6 LCS 280-325289/4 LCS 280-325349/4 280-82718-X-1 MS 280-82923-Y-3 MS 280-82718-X-1 MSD 280-82923-Y-3 MSD Surrogate TW-1 Tit' -2 TW-4 TW-5 TW-8 TW-8 TW-9 TW-10 TW-D► TRIP BLANK 117 118 114 129X 121 116 121 127 130X 104 100 102 100 106 94 91 101 96 103 100 100 104 102 96 97 102 103 86 96 101 101 100 94 87 96 88 110 108 106 113 113 107 112 119 116 106 98 102 101 107 97 93 101 97 103 101 102 102 104 97 100 106 106 100 98 102 107 113 97 100 100 100 Acceptance Limits DCA = 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) BFB = 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) DBFM = Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) TOL = Toluene -d8 (Surr) 70-127 78-120 77-120 80-125 TestAmerica Denver Page 65 of 98 05/16/2016 Quality Control Results Client: Waste Management Method Blank - Batch: 280-325289 Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: Leach Date: Analyte MB 280-325289/6 Water 1.0 05/13/2016 2103 05/13/2016 2103 N/A Analysis Batch: Prep Batch: Leach Batch: Units: 1,1,1 ,2-Tetrachloroethane 1,1 ,1-T richloroetha ne 1,1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethene 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1,2-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloropropane 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2-Butanone (MEK) 2-Hexanone 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) Acetone Acrylonitrile Benzene Bromochlo ro metha ne Bromod ich lord methane Bromoform Bromo metha ne Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Ch to rod i b ro mometha ne Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane cis-1,2-Dichloroethene cis-1,3-Dichloropropene Dibromomethane Ethyl be nze ne lodomethane Methylene Chloride Styrene Tetrachloroethene Toluene trans-1,2-Dichloroethene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene Trichloroethene Trichlorofluoromethane l o rofluo ro meths ne Vinyl acetate Vinyl chloride Xylenes (total) 280-325289 N/A N/A ug/L Result ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Job Number: 280-82795-1 Method: 8260E Preparation: 5030E Instrument I D : Lab File ID: Initial Weight/Volume: Final Weight/Volume: Qual VMS_MS9 MS9_4709.D 20 mL 20 mL RL 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10 10 5.0 5.0 10 50 10 10 34 100 5.0 10 5.0 5.0 10 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10 5.0 10 10 5.0 10 5.0 10 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10 5.0 10 5.0 10 10 1.0 10 TestAmerica Denver Page 66 of 98 05/16/2016 Quality Control Results Client: Waste Management Surrogate %Rec Job Number: 280-82795-1 Acceptance Limits 1,2-Dichloraethane-d4 (Surr) 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Sure) Dibromofluoromethane (Sur) Toluene -d8 (Surr) Lab Control Sample - Batch: 280-325289 Lab Sample I D : Client Matrix: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: Leach Date: LCS 280-325289/4 Water 1.0 05/13/2016 2042 05/13/2016 2042 N/A Analyte 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethene 1,2-Dichloropropane 1,3-Dichlorobenzene Benzene Bromod ich to ro methane Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroform Ethyl benzene Methylene Chloride Tetrachloroethene Toluene trans-1,2-Dichloroethene Trichloroethene Surrogate 100 96 98 98 Analysis Batch: Prep Batch: Leach Batch: Units: Spike Amount 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) Toluene -d8 (Surr) 280-325289 N/A N/A ug/L Result 5.20 % Rec 100 101 101 107 4.89 4.56 5.17 4.47 5.02 4.98 5.13 4.61 4.96 4.89 4.30 5.16 5.45 4.93 5.35 70 - 127 78 - 120 77 - 120 80 - 125 Method: 8260E Preparation: 5030B Instrument ID: Lab File ID: Initial Weight/Volume: Final Weight/Volume: a Rec. 104 98 91 103 89 100 100 103 92 99 98 86 103 109 99 107 VMS_MS9 MS9_4708. D 20 rnL 20 mL Limit 55 -135 65 135 65-136 64-135 65-135 65-135 65-135 65-135 55-135 55-135 65-135 54 - 141 55 -135 65 - 135 55 -135 55-135 (Dual Acceptance Limits J j J J j J J J 70 127 78-120 77-120 80 - 125 TestAmerica Denver Page 67 of 98 05/16/2016 Client: Waste Management Matrix Spike! Matrix Spike Duplicate Recovery Report - Batch: 280-325289 MS Lab Sample ID: 280-82718-X-1 MS Client Matrix: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: Leach Date: Water 1.0 05/13/2016 2148 05/13/2016 2148 N/A Analysis Batch: 280-325289 Prep Batch: N/A Leach Batch: N/A Quality Control Results Job Number: 280-82795-1 Method: 8260E Preparation: 5030E Instrument I D : Lab File ID: Initial Weight/Volume: Final Weight/Volume: VMS_MS9 MS9_4711.D 20 mL 20 mL 20 mL MSD Lab Sample ID: 280-82718-X-1 MSD Client Matrix: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: Leach Date: Analyte Water 1.0 05/13/2016 2209 05/13/2016 2209 N/A Analysis Batch: 280-325289 Prep Batch: N/A Leach Batch: N/A % Rec. MS MSD Limit Instrument I D : Lab File ID: Initial Weight/Volume: Final Weight/Volume: VMS_MS9 MS9_4712.D 20 mL 20 mL 20 mL RPD RPD Limit MS Qual MSD Qual 1, 1 ,1-Trichloroetha ne 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethene 1,2-Dichloropropane 1,3-Dichlorobenzene Benzene Bromod i ch l oro metha ne Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroform Ethylbenzene Methylene Chloride Tetrachloroethene Toluene trans-1,2-Dichloroethene Trichloroethene Surrogate 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) Toluene -d8 (Surr) 99 92 95 94 80 91 90 96 83 93 87 69 91 99 93 97 109 99 99 102 88 100 101 103 91 102 95 77 99 109 100 104 MS % Rec 94 94 97 97 65 - 135 65- 135 65 - 136 64 - 135 65 - 135 65 - 135 65 - 135 65 - 135 65 - 135 65 - 135 65 - 135 54 - 141 65 - 135 65- 135 65 - 135 65 - 135 9 8 4 9 9 9 12 7 9 9 9 10 9 9 7 7 MSD % Rec 101 96 101 100 20 21 20 20 20 20 20 21 20 20 20 26 20 20 24 20 Acceptance Limits 70 - 127 78 - 120 77 - 120 80 - 125 TestAmerica Denver Page 68 of 98 05/16/2016 Quality Control Results Client: Waste Management Matrix Spike! Matrix Spike Duplicate Recovery Report - Batch: 280-325289 MS Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: Leach Date: 280-82718-X-1 MS Water 1.0 05/13/2016 2148 05/13/2016 2148 N/A Analyte 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethene 1,2-Dichloropropane 1,3-Dichlorobenzene Benzene Bromodichloromethane lord methane Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroform Ethyl be nze ne Methylene Chloride Tetrachloroethene Toluene trans-1,2-Dichloroethene Trichloroethene Units: ug/L Sample Result/Qual ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND MS Spike Amount 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 Job Number: 280-82795-1 Method: 8260E Preparation: 5030E MSD Lab Sample ID: 280-82718-X-1 MSD Client Matrix: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: Leach Date: MSD Spike Amount 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 Water 1.0 05/13/2016 2209 05/13/2016 2209 N/A MS Result/Qual ND ND ND ND 4.02 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND MSD Result/Qual 5.43 ND ND 5.12 4.42 5.02 5.07 5.16 ND 5.08 ND ND ND 5.45 ND 5.20 TestAmerica Denver Page 69 of 98 05/16/2016 Quality Control Results Client: Waste Management Method Blank - Batch: 280-325349 Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: Leach Date: Analyte MB 280-325349/6 Water 1.0 05/15/2016 1251 05/15/2016 1251 N/A Analysis Batch: Prep Batch: Leach Batch: Units: 1,1,1 ,2-Tetrachloroethane 1,1 ,1-T richloroetha ne 1,1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethene 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1,2-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloropropane 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2-Butanone (MEK) 2-Hexanone 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) Acetone Acrylonitrile Benzene Bromochlo ro metha ne Bromod ich lord methane Bromoform Bromo metha ne Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Ch to rod i b ro mometha ne Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane cis-1,2-Dichloroethene cis-1,3-Dichloropropene Dibromomethane Ethyl be nze ne lodomethane Methylene Chloride Styrene Tetrachloroethene Toluene trans-1,2-Dichloroethene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene Trichloroethene Trichlorofluoromethane l o rofluo ro meths ne Vinyl acetate Vinyl chloride Xylenes (total) 280-325349 N/A N/A ug/L Result ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Job Number: 280-82795-1 Method: 8260E Preparation: 5030E Instrument I D : Lab File ID: Initial Weight/Volume: Final Weight/Volume: Qual VMS_R1 R2665.O 20 mL 20 mL RL 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10 10 5.0 5.0 10 50 10 10 34 100 5.0 10 5.0 5.0 10 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10 5.0 10 10 5.0 10 5.0 10 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10 5.0 10 5.0 10 10 1.0 10 TestAmerica Denver Page 70 of 98 05/16/2016 Quality Control Results Client: Waste Management Surrogate 1,2-Dichloraethane-d4 (Surr) 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) Dibromofluoromethane (Sur) Toluene -d8 (Surr) Lab Control Sample - Batch: 280-325349 Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: Leach Date: LCS 280-325349/4 Water 1.0 05/15/2015 1231 05/15/2016 1231 N/A Analyte 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethene 1,2-Dichlaropropane 1,3-Dichlorobenzene Benzene Bromod ich to ro methane Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroform Ethyl benzene Methylene Chloride Tetrachloraethene Toluene trans-1,2-Dichloroethene Trichloroethene Surrogate %Rec 102 101 102 102 Analysis Batch: Prep Batch: Leach Batch: Units: Spike Amount 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 Job Number: 280-82795-1 Acceptance Limits 280-325349 N/A N/A ug/L Result % Rec 5.43 4.69 4.33 5.15 5.34 5.05 5.20 5.72 5.25 5.37 5.52 4.36 5.77 5.63 5.06 5.25 70 - 127 78 - 120 77 - 120 80-125 Method: 8260E Preparation: 5030B Instrument ID: Lab File ID: Initial Weight/Volume: Final Weight/Volume: % Rec. 109 94 87 103 107 101 104 114 105 107 110 87 115 113 101 105 VM S_R 1 82854. D 20 mL 20 rnL Limit 55 -135 65 135 65-136 64-135 65-135 6i5-135 55-135 65-135 55-135 55-135 65-135 54 - 141 55 -135 65-135 55 -135 55-135 (Dual Acceptance Limits J j �J J 1,2-Dichlorcethane-d4 (Surr) 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) Toluene -d8 (Surr) 106 100 107 113 70 127 78-120 77-120 80 - 125 TestAmerica Denver Page 71 of 08 05/16/2016 Client: Waste Management Matrix Spike! Matrix Spike Duplicate Recovery Report - Batch: 280-325349 MS Lab Sample ID: 280-82923-Y-3 MS Client Matrix: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: Leach Date: Water 1.0 05/15/2016 1330 05/15/2016 1330 N/A Analysis Batch: 280-325349 Prep Batch: N/A Leach Batch: N/A Quality Control Results Job Number: 280-82795-1 Method: 8250E Preparation: 5030E Instrument I D : Lab File ID: Initial Weight/Volume: Final Weight/Volume: VMS_R1 R2667.O 20 mL 20 mL 20 mL MSD Lab Sample ID: 280-82923-Y-3 MSD Client Matrix: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: Leach Date: Analyte Water 1.0 05/15/2016 1349 05/15/2016 1349 N/A Analysis Batch: 280-325349 Prep Batch: N/A Leach Batch: N/A % Rec. MS MSD Limit Instrument I D : Lab File ID: Initial Weight/Volume: Final Weight/Volume: VM S_R 1 R2668.D 20 mL 20 mL 20 mL RPD RPD Limit MS Qual MSD Qual 1, 1 ,1-Trichloroetha ne 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethene 1,2-Dichloropropane 1,3-Dichlorobenzene Benzene Bromod i ch l oro metha ne Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroform Ethylbenzene Methylene Chloride Tetrachloroethene Toluene trans-1,2-Dichloroethene Trichloroethene Surrogate 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) Toluene -d8 (Surr) 105 90 82 97 104 97 100 110 102 103 108 75 111 109 97 102 103 95 83 101 104 98 105 108 102 104 105 80 109 111 98 101 MS%Rec 91 87 93 100 65 - 135 65- 135 65 - 136 64 - 135 65 - 135 65 - 135 65 - 135 65 - 135 65 - 135 65 - 135 65 - 135 54 - 141 65 - 135 65- 135 65 - 135 65 - 135 1 20 5 21 0 20 4 20 0 20 1 20 5 20 2 21 0 20 1 20 2 20 6 26 3 20 2 20 1 24 1 20 MSD % Rec 96 88 97 100 Acceptance Limits 70 - 127 78 - 120 77 - 120 80 - 125 TestAmerica Denver Page 72 of 98 05/16/2016 Quality Control Results Client: Waste Management Matrix Spike! Matrix Spike Duplicate Recovery Report - Batch: 280-325349 MS Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: Leach Date: 280-82923-Y-3 MS Water 1.0 05115/2016 1330 05/15/2016 1330 N/A Analyte 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethene 1,2-Dichloropropane 1,3-Dichlorobenzene Benzene Bromodichloromethane lord methane Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroform Ethyl be nze ne Methylene Chloride Tetrachloroethene Toluene trans-1,2-Dichloroethene Trichloroethene Units: ug/L Sample Result/Qual ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND MS Spike Amount 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 Job Number: 280-82795-1 Method: 8260E Preparation: 5030E MSD Lab Sample ID: 280-82923-Y-3 MSD Client Matrix: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: Leach Date: MSD Spike Amount 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 Water 1.0 05/15/2016 1349 05/15/2016 1349 N/A MS Result/Qual 5.24 ND ND ND 5.18 ND 5.01 5.51 5.08 7.02 5.38 ND 5.57 5.44 ND 5.09 MSD Result/Qual 5.16 ND ND 5.05 5.18 ND 5.26 5.42 5.11 7.09 5.27 ND 5.43 5.55 ND 5.06 TestAmerica Denver Page 73 of 98 05/16/2016 Quality Control Results Client: Waste Management Method Blank - Batch: 280-324196 Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: Leach Date: Analyte MB 280-324196/1-A Water 1.0 05/09/2016 2331 05/09/2016 0805 N/A Analysis Batch: Prep Batch: Leach Batch: Units: Calcium Magnesium Potassium Sodium Lab Control Sample - Batch: 280-324196 Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: Leach Date: Analyte Calcium Magnesium Potassium Sodium LCS 280-324196/2-A Water 1.0 05/09/2016 2334 05/09/2016 0805 N/A 280-324565 280-324196 N/A ugh_ Result ND ND ND ND Analysis Batch: Prep Batch: Leach Batch: Units: Spike Amount 50000 50000 50000 50000 Job Number: 280-82795-1 Method: 6010B Preparation: 3005A Total Recoverable Instrument ID: MT_026 Lab File ID: 26a050916c.asc Initial Weight/Volume: 50 mL Final Weight/Volume: 50 mL Qual 280-324565 280-324196 N/A ug/L Result 49600 49100 49700 51900 Method: 6010B Preparation: 3005A Total Recoverable Instrument ID: Lab File ID: Initial Weight/Volume: Final Weight/Volume: RL 5000 5000 5000 5000 MT_026 26a050916c.asc 50 mi.. 50 mL % Rec. Limit Qual 99 98 99 104 90 - 111 90 - 113 89-114 90 - 115 TestAmerica Denver Page 74 of 98 05/16/2016 Quality Control Results Client: Waste Management Matrix Spike! Matrix Spike Duplicate Recovery Report - Batch: 280-324196 MS Lab Sample ID: 280-82795-1 Client Matrix: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: Leach Date: Water 1.0 05/09/2016 2342 05/09/2016 0805 N/A Analysis Batch: 280-324565 Prep Batch: 280-324196 Leach Batch: N/A Job Number: 280-82795-1 Method: 6010E Preparation: 3005A Dissolved Instrument ID: Lab File ID: Initial Weight/Volume: Final Weight/Volume: MT_020 26a0509I6c.asc 50 mL 50 mL MSD Lab Sample ID: 280-82795-1 Client Matrix: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: Leach Date: Analyte Water 1,0 05/09/2010 2345 05/09/2016 0805 N/A Analysis Batch: 280-324565 Prep Batch: 280-324196 Leach Batch: N/A % Rec. MS MSD Limit Instrument ID: Lab File ID: Initial Weight/Volume: Final Weight/Volume: MT_026 26a050915c.asc 50 mL 50 mL RPD RPD Limit MS Qual MSD Qual Calcium Magnesium Potassium Sodium 98 81 104 109 106 109 104 116 48 - 153 02 - 146 70 - 132 70 - 203 Matrix Spike! Matrix Spike Duplicate Recovery Report - Batch: 280-324196 MS Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: Leach Date: Analyte Calcium Magnesium Potassium Sodium 280-82795-1 Water 1.0 05/09/2010 2342 05/09/2016 0805 N/A Units: ug/L Sample Res u It/Qua l 180000 430000 ND 160000 MS Spike Amount 50000 50000 50000 50000 2 3 0 2 20 20 4 4 20 20 Method: 6010B Preparation: 3005A► Dissolved MSD Lab Sample ID: 280-82795-1 Client Matrix: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: Leach Date: MSD Spike Amount 50000 50000 50000 50000 Water 1.0 05/09/2016 2345 05/09/2016 0805 N/A MS Result/Qual lt/Qua I MSD Res u It/Qua I 227000 466000 4 55700 217000 231000 480000 4 55600 220000 TestAmerica Denver Page 75 of 98 05/16/2016 Quality Control Results Client: Waste Management Method Blank - Batch: 280-324600 Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: Leach Date: Analyte MB 280-324600/6 Water 1.0 05/10/2016 1124 N/A N/A Analysis Batch: Prep Batch: Leach Batch: Units: 280-324600 N/A N/A mg,/ Result Job Number: 280-82795-1 Method: 300.0► Preparation: N/A Instrument ID: Lab File ID: Initial Weight/Volume: Final Weight/Volume: Qual WC_IonChroni5 06.0000.d 5 mL 5 mL RL Chloride Sulfate ND ND Method Reporting Limit Check - Batch: 280-324600 Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: Leach Date: Analyte Chloride Sulfate MRL 280-324600/3 Water 1.0 05/10/2016 1031 N/A N/A Analysis Batch: Prep Batch: Leach Batch: Units: Spike Amount 2.50 2.50 280-324600 N/A N/A mg/L Result ND ND Method: 300.0 Preparation: N/A Instrument I D : Lab File I'D: Initial Weight/Volume: Final Weight/Volume: % Rec. 103 104 0.50 5.0 WC_IonChrom5 03.0000..d 5 mL 5 mL Limit 50-150 50-150 Lab Control Sample/ Method: 300.0 Lab Control Sample Duplicate Recovery Report - Batch: 280-324600 Preparation: N/A LCS Lab Sample ID: LCS 230-324500/4 Client Matrix: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: Leach Date: Water 1.0 05/10/2016 1049 N/A N/A Analysis Batch: Prep Batch: Leach Batch: Units: 280-324600 N/A NIA mg/L Instrument ID: Lab File ID: Initial Weight/Volume: Final Weight/Volume: Qual WC_IonChrom5 04.0000.d 5 mL 5 mL 25 uL LCSD Lab Sample ID: LCSD 280-324600/5 Client Matrix: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: Leach Date: Analyte Water 1.0 05/10/2016 1107 N/A NIA Analysis Batch: Prep Batch: Leach Batch: Units: % Rec. LCS LCSD 280-324600 N/A N/A mg/L Limit Instrument ID: Lab File ID: Initial Weight/Volume: Final Weight/Volume: WC_IonChrom5 05.0000.d 5 mL 5 rmL 25 uL RPD RPD Limit LCS Qual LCSD Qual Chloride Sulfate 101 101 101 101 90 110 90 110 0 10 0 10 TestAmerica Denver Page 76 of 98 05/16/2016 Quality Control Results Client: Waste Management Laboratory Control/ Laboratory Duplicate Data Report - Batch: 280-324600 LCS Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: Leach Date: Analyte LOS 280-324600/4 Water 1.0 05/10/2016 1049 N/A N/A Units: mg.&L LCS Spike LCSD Spike Amount Amount Job Number: 280-82795-1 Method: 300.0 Preparation: N/A LCSD Lab Sample ID: LCSD 280-324600/5 Client Matrix: Water Dilution: 1.0 Analysis Date: 05/10/2016 1107 Prep Date: N/A Leach Date: N/A LCS LCSD Result/Qual Result/Qual Chloride Sulfate 100 100 101 101 100 100 101 101 TestAmerica Denver Page 77 of 98 05/16/2016 Quality Control Results Client: Waste Management Matrix Spike! Matrix Spike Duplicate Recovery Report - Batch: 280-324600 MS Lab Sample ID: 280-82795-6 Client Matrix: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: Leach Date: Water 1.0 05/10/2016 1745 N/A N/A Analysis Batch: 280-324600 Prep Batch: N/A Leach Batch: N/A Job Number: 280-82795-1 Method: 300.0 Preparation: N/A Instrument ID: Lab File ID: Initial Weight/Volume: Final Weight/Volume: WD_IonChrom5 21.0000.d 5 mL 5 mL 25 uL MSD Lab Sample ID: 280-82795-6 Client Matrix: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: Leach Date: Anal yte Chloride Water 1.0 05/10/2016 1803 N/A N/A Analysis Batch: 280-324600 Prep Batch: N/A Leach Batch: N/A % Rec. MS MSD Limit Instrument ID: Lab File ID: Initial Weight/Volume: Final Weight/Volume: 108 108 80-120 Matrix Spike! Matrix Spike Duplicate Recovery Report - Batch: 280-324600 MS Lab Sample ID: 280-82795-6 Client Matrix: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: Leach Date: Water 5.0 05/11/2016 0042 N/A N/A Analysis Batch: 280-324600 Prep Batch: N/A Leach Batch: N/A WD_Ionhrom5 22.0000.d 5 mL 5 mL 25 uL RPD RPD Limit MS Qual MSD Qual 0 20 Method: 300.0 Preparation: N/A Instrument ID: Lab File ID: Initial Weight/Volume: Final Weight/Volume: WC_IonChrom6 39.0000.d 5 rnL 5 rnL 25 uL MSD Lab Sample ID: 280-82795-6 Client Matrix: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: Leach Date: Analyte Water 5.0 05/11/2016 0059 N/A N/A Analysis Batch: 280-324600 Prep Batch: N/A Leach Batch: N/A % Rec. MS MSD Limit Instrument ID: Lab File ID: Initial Weight/Volume: Final Weight/Volume: WC_Ion hrom6 40.0000.d 5 mL 5 mL 25 uL RPD RPD Limit MS Qual MSD Qual Sulfate 96 96 80 - 120 0 20 TestAmerica Denver Page 78 of 98 05/16/2016 Quality Control Results Client: Waste Management Matrix Spike! Matrix Spike Duplicate Recovery Report - Batch: 280-324600 MS Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: Leach Date: Analyte Chloride 280-82795-6 Water 1.0 05/10/2016 1745 N/A N/A Units: mg/L Sample Result/Qual MS Spike Amount Job Number: 280-82795-1 Method: 300.0 Preparation: N/A MSD Lab Sample ID: 280-82795-6 Client Matrix: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: Leach Date: Water 1.0 05/10/2016 1803 N/A N/A MSD Spike MS Amount Result/Qual 11 25.0 Matrix Spike/ Matrix Spike Duplicate Recovery Report - Batch: 280-324600 MS Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: Leach Date: Analyte Sulfate 280-82795-6 Water 5.0 05/11/2016 0042 N/A N/A Units: mg/L Sample Result/Qual 25.0 37.9 Method: 300.0 Preparation: N/A MSD Result/Qual 37.9 MSD Lab Sample ID: 280-82795-6 Client. Matrix: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: Leach Date: MS Spike MSD Spike MS Water 5.0 05/11/2016 0059 N/A N/A Amount Amount Result/Qual MSD Result/Qual 290 125 125 409 409 TestAmerica Denver Page 79 of 98 05/16/2016 Quality Control Results Client: Waste Management Duplicate - Batch: 280-324600 Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: Leach Date: Analyte 280-82795-6 Water 1.0 05/10/2016 1727 N/A N/A Analysis Batch: Prep Batch: Leach Batch: Units: 280-324600 N/A N/A mg/L Sample ResultWQual Chloride Duplicate - Batch: 280-324600 Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: Leach Date:. Analyte 280-82795-6 Water 5.0 05/11/2016 0024 N/A N/A 11 Analysis Batch: Prep Batch: Leach Batch: Units: 280-324600 N/A N/A mg/L Sample Result/Qual Result 10.8 Job Number: 280-82795-1 Method: 300.0► Preparation: N/A Instrument ID: Lab File ID: Initial Weight/Volume: Final Weight/Volume: WD_IonChrom6 20.0000.d 5 mL 5 mL 25 uL RPD Limit Qual Result 0.06 15 Method: 300.0 Preparation: NIA Instrument ID: Lab File ID: Initial Weight/Volume: Final Weight/Volume: WD_lonchrom6 38.0000.d 5 mL 5 mL 25 uL RPD Limit Qual Sulfate 290 288 0 15 TestAmerica Denver Page 80 of 98 05/16/2016 Quality Control Results Client: Waste Management Method Blank - Batch: 280-324592 Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: Leach Date: Analyte MB 280-324592/6 Water 1.0 05/09/2016 1723 N/A N/A Analysis Batch: Prep Batch: Leach Batch: Units: Total Alkalinity Bicarbonate Alkalinity Carbonate Alkalinity Lab Control Sample! Lab Control Sample Duplicate Recovery Report - Batch: 280-324592 280-324592 N/A N/A mg/L Job Number: 280-82795-1 Method: SM 2320B Preparation: N/A Instrument ID: WC-AT3 Lab File ID: 050916 alk.txt Initial Weight/Volume: Final Weight/Volume: Qual RL LCS Lab Sample ID: LCS 280-32459214 Client Matrix: Dilution:. Analysis Date: Prep Date: Leach Date: Water 1.0 05/09/2016 1713 N/A N/A Result ND ND ND Analysis Batch: Prep Batch: Leach Batch: Units` . 280-324592 N/A N/A mg/L 10 10 10 Method: SM 2320B Preparation: N/A Instrument ID: WC-AT3 Lab File ID: 050916 alk.txt Initial Weight/Volume: Final Weight/Volume: LCSD Lab Sample ID: LCSD 280-324592/5 Client Matrix: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: Leach Date: Analyte Water 1.0 05/09/2016 1718 N/A N/A Analysis Batch: Prep Batch: Leach Batch: Units: % Rec. LCS LCSD 280-324592 N/A N/A mg/L Limit Instrument ID: WC-AT3 Lab File ID: 050916 alk.txt Initial Weight/Volume: Final Weight/Volume: RPD RPD Limit LCS Qual LCSD Qual Total Alkalinity 90 105 Laboratory Control/ Laboratory Duplicate Data Report - Batch: 280-324592 LCS Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Dilution : Analysis Date: Prep Date: Leach Date: Analyte LCS 280-324592/4 Water 1.0 05/09/2016 1713 N/A N/A Units: mg/L LCS Spike Amount 90-110 LCSD Spike Amount 16 10 Method: SM 2320B Preparation: N/A LCSD Lab Sample ID: LCSD 280-324592/5 Client Matrix: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: Leach Date: LCS Result/Qual Water 1.0 05/0912015 1718 N/A N/A LCSD Result/Qual Total Alkalinity 200 200 180 210 TestAmerica Denver Page 81 of 98 05/16/2016 Quality Control Results Client: Waste Management Duplicate - Batch: 280-324592 Lab Sample ID: Client Matrix: Dilution: Analysis Date: Prep Date: Leach Date: Analyte 280-82458-A-26 DU Water 1.0 05/09/2016 1732 N/A N/A Analysis Batch: Prep Batch: Leach Batch: Units: 280-324592 N/A N/A mg/L Sample ResultlQual Result Job Number: 280-82795-1 Method: SM 2320E Preparation: N/A Instrument ID: WC-AT3 Lab File ID: 050916 alk.txt Initial Weight/Volume: Final Weight/Volume: RPD Limit Qual Total Alkalinity 170 168 0.2 10 TestAmerica Denver Page 82 of 98 05/16/2016 Quality Control Results Client: Waste Management Laboratory Chronicle Lab ID: 280-82795-1 Method Bottle ID Client ID: TW-1 Sample Date/Time: Analysis Run Batch Job Number: 280-82795-1 05/04/2016 08:15 Received Date/Time: 05/05/2016 13:00 Date Prepared / Prep Batch Analyzed Dil Lab Analyst P:5030B A:8260B 280-82795-E-1 280-82795-E-1 280-325289 280-325289 05/14/2016 01:38 1 05/14/2016 01:38 1 TAL DEN JNL TAL DEN JNL P:3005A A:6010B 280 -82795 -B -1-A► 280 -82795 -B -1-A 280-324565 280-324196 05/09/2016 08:05 1 280-324565 280-324196 05/09/2016 23:37 1 TAL DEN TEB TAL DEN SJS A:300.0 A:300.0 280-82795-A-1 280-82795-A-1 280-324600 280-324600 05/10/2016 15:06 1 05/10/2016 23:13 10 TAL DEN AFB TAL DEN AFB A:SM 2320B 280-82795-A-1 280-324592 05/09/2016 17:52 1 TAL DEN IEU A:Field Sampling 280-82795-A-1 280-324348 05/04/2016 08:15 1 TAL DEN K1 S Lab ID: 280-82795-1 MS Method P:3005A A:6010B Bottle ID 280 -82795 -B -1-B MS 280 -82795 -B -1-B MS Client ID: TW-1 Sample Date/Time: 05/04/2016 08:15 Received Date/Time: 05/05/2016 13:00 Analysis Date Prepared / Run Batch Prep Batch Analyzed Dil 280-324565 280-324565 Lab Analyst 280-324196 05/09/2016 08:05 1 280-324196 05/09/2016 23:42 1 TAL DEN TEB TAL DEN SJS Lab ID: 280-82795-1 MSD Method Bottle ID Client ID: TW-1 Sample Date/Time: 05/04/2016 08:15 Received Date/Time: 05/05/2016 13:00 Analysis Date Prepared / Run Batch Prep Batch Analyzed Dil Lab Analyst P:3005A A:6010B 280 -82795 -B -1-C MSD 280 -82795 -B -1-C MSD 280-324565 280-324196 05/09/2016 08:05 1 280-324565 280-324196 05/09/2016 23:45 1 TAL DEN TEB TAL DEN SJS Lab ID: 280-82795-2 Method Bottle ID Client ID: TW-2 Sample Date/Time: 05/03/2016 13:25 Analysis Run Batch Received Date/Time: 05/05/2016 13:00 Date Prepared I Prep Batch Analyzed Dil Lab Analyst P:5030B A:8260B 280-82795-E-2 280-82795-E-2 280-325289 280-325289 05/14/2016 01:59 1 05/14/2016 01:59 1 TAL DEN JNL TAL DEN JNL P:3005A► A:6010B 280 -82795 -B -2-A► 280 -82795 -B -2-A 280-324565 280-324196 05/09/2016 08:05 1 280-324565 280-324196 05/09/2016 23:48 1 TAL DEN TEB TAL DEN SJS A:300.0 A:300.0 280-82795-A-2 280-82795-A-2 280-324600 280-324600 05/10/2016 15:23 1 05/10/2016 23:31 20 TAL DEN AFB TAL DEN AFB A:SM 2320E 280-82795-A-2 280-324592 05/09/2016 17:58 1 TAL DEN I EU A:Field Sampling 280-82795-A-2 280-324348 05/03/2016 13:25 1 TAL DEN K1 S TestAmerica Denver A = Analytical Method P = Prep Method Page 83 of 98 05/16/2016 Quality Control Results Client: Waste Management Laboratory Chronicle Lab ID: 280-82795-3 Method Bottle ID Client ID: TW-4 Sample Date/Time: 05/03/2016 15:10 Analysis Run Batch Job Number: 280-82795-1 Received Date/Time: 05/05/2016 13:00 Date Prepared I Prep Batch Analyzed Dil Lab Analyst P:5030B A:8260B 280-82795-E-3 280-82795-E-3 280-325289 280-325289 05/14/2016 02:20 1 05/14/2016 02:20 1 TAL DEN JNL TAL DEN JNL P:3005A A:6010B 280 -82795 -B -3-A► 280 -82795 -B -3-A 280-324565 280-324196 05/09/2016 08:05 1 280-324565 280-324196 05/10/2016 00:02 1 TAL DEN TEB TAL DEN SJS A:300.0 A:300.0 280-82795-A-3 280-82795-A-3 280-324600 280-324600 05/10/2016 15:41 1 05/10/2016 23:48 10 TAL DEN AFB TAL DEN AFB A:SM 2320E 280-82795-A-3 280-324592 05/09/2016 18:03 1 TAL DEN IEU A:Field Sampling 280-82795-A-3 280-324348 05/03/2016 15:10 1 TAL DEN K1 S Lab ID: 280-82795-4 Method Bottle ID Client ID: TW-5 Sample Date/Time: 05/03/2016 18:00 Received Date/Time: 05/05/2016 13:00 Analysis Date Prepared / Run Batch Prep Batch Analyzed Dil Lab Analyst P:5030B A:8260B 280-82795-D-4 280-82795-D-4 280-325289 280-325289 05/14/2016 05:16 1 05/14/2016 05:16 1 TAL DEN JNL TAL DEN JNL P:3005A A:6010B 280 -82795 -B -4-A► 280 -82795 -B -4-A► 280-324565 280-324196 05/09/2016 08:05 1 280-324565 280-324196 05/10/2016 00:05 1 TAL DEN TEB TAL DEN SJS A:300.0 280-82795-A-4 280-324600 05/10/2016 15:59 1 TAL DEN AFB A:SM 2320E 280-82795-A-4 280-324592 05/09/2016 18:08 1 TAL DEN IEU A:Field Sampling 280-82795-A-4 280-324348 05/03/2016 18:00 1 TAL DEN K1 S Lab ID: 280-82795-5 Method Bottle ID Client ID: TW-6 Sample Date/Time: 05/03/2016 17:05 Analysis Run Batch Received Date/ime: 05/05/2016 13:00 Date Prepared / Prep Batch Analyzed Dil Lab Analyst P:5030B A:8260B 280-82795-E-5 280-82795-E-5 280-325289 280-325289 05/14/2016 05:37 1 05/14/2016 05:37 1 TAL DEN JNL TAL DEN JNL P:3005A► A:6010B 280 -82795 -B -5-A 280 -82795 -B -5-A 280-324565 280-324565 280-324196 05/09/2016 08:05 1 280-324196 05/10/2016 00:07 1 TAL DEN TEB TAL DEN SJS A:300.0 280-82795-A-5 280-324600 05/10/2016 16:16 1 TAL DEN AFB A:SM 2320B 280-82795-A-5 280-324592 05/09/2016 18:13 1 TAL DEN IEU A:Field Sampling 280-82795-A-5 280-324348 05/03/2016 17:05 1 TAL DEN K1 S TestAmerica Denver A = Analytical Method P = Prep Method Page 84 of 98 05/16/2016 Quality Control Results Client: Waste Management Laboratory Chronicle Lab ID: 280-82795-6 Method Bottle ID Client ID: TW-8 Sample Date/Time: 05/04/2016 09:55 Analysis Run Batch Job Number: 280-82795-1 Received Date/Time: 05/05/2016 13:00 Date Prepared / Prep Batch Analyzed Dil Lab Analyst P:5030B A:8260B 280-82795-E-6 280-82795-E-6 280-325289 280-325289 05/14/2016 05:58 1 05/14/2016 05:58 1 TAL DEN JNL TAL DEN JNL P:3005A A:6010B 280 -82795 -B -6-A 280 -82795 -B -6-A 280-324565 280-324196 05/09/2016 08:05 1 280-324565 280-324196 05/10/2016 00:10 1 TAL DEN TEB TAL DEN SJS A:300.0 A:300.0 280-82795-A-6 280-82795-A-6 280-324600 280-324600 05/10/2016 17:10 1 05/11/2016 00:06 5 TAL DEN AFB TAL DEN AFB A:SM 2320E 280-82795-A-6 280-324592 05/09/2016 18:27 1 TAL DEN IEU A:Field Sampling 280-82795-A-6 280-324348 05/04/2016 09:55 1 TAL DEN K1 S Lab ID: 280-82795-6 MS Method A:300.0 A:300.0 Bottle ID 280-82795-A-6 MS 280-82795-A-6 MS Client ID: TW-8 Sample Date/Time: 05/04/2016 09:55 Analysis Run Batch 280-324600 280-324600 Prep Batch Received Date/Time: 05/05/2016 13:00 Date Prepared / Analyzed Dil Lab Analyst 05/10/2016 17:45 1 05/11/2016 00:42 5 TAL DEN AFB TAL DEN AFB Lab ID: 280-82795-6 MSD Method Bottle ID Client ID: TW-8 Sample Date/Time: 05/04/2016 09:55 Analysis Run Batch Received Date/Time: 05/05/2016 13:00 Date Prepared / Prep Batch Analyzed Dil Lab Analyst A:300.0 A:300.0 280-82795-A-6 MSD 280-82795-A-6 MSD 280-324600 280-324600 05/10/2016 18:03 1 05/11/2016 00:59 5 TAL DEN AFB TAL DEN AFB Lab ID: 280-82795-6 DU Method Bottle ID Client ID: TW-8 Sample Date/Time: 05/04/2016 09:55 Analysis Run Batch Received Date/Time: 05/05/2016 13:00 Date Prepared / Prep Batch Analyzed Dil Lab Analyst A:300.0 A:300.0 280-82795-A-6 DU 280-82795-A-6 DU 280-324600 280-324600 05/10/2016 17:27 1 05/11/2016 00:24 5 TAL DEN AFB TAL DEN AFB TestAmerica Denver A = Analytical Method P = Prep Method Page 85 of 98 05/16/2016 Quality Control Results Client: Waste Management Laboratory Chronicle Lab ID: 280-82795-7 Method Bottle ID Client ID: TW-9 Sample Date/Time: 05/04/2016 16:40 Analysis Run Batch Job Number: 280-82795-1 Received Date/Time: 05/05/2016 13:00 Date Prepared / Prep Batch Analyzed Dil Lab Analyst P:5030B A:8260B 280-82795-E-7 280-82795-E-7 280-325289 280-325289 05/14/2016 06:19 1 05/14/2016 06:19 1 TAL DEN JNL TAL DEN JNL P:3005A A:6010B 280 -82795 -B -7-A► 280 -82795 -B -7-A 280-324565 280-324196 05/09/2016 08:05 1 280-324565 280-324196 05/10/2016 00:13 1 TAL DEN TEB TAL DEN SJS A:300.0 A:300.0 280-82795-A-7 280-82795-A-7 280-324600 280-324600 05/10/2016 18:20 1 05/11/2016 01:52 5 TAL DEN AFB TAL DEN AFB A:SM 2320E 280-82795-A-7 280-324592 05/09/2016 18:31 1 TAL DEN IEU A:Field Sampling 280-82795-A-7 280-324348 05/04/2016 16:40 1 TAL DEN K1 S Lab ID: 280-82795-8 Method Bottle ID Client ID: TVA' -10 Sample Date/Time: 05/04/2016 15:40 Analysis Run Batch Prep Batch Received Date/Time: 05/05/2016 13:00 Date Prepared / Analyzed Dil Lab Analyst P:5030B A:8260B 280-82795-E-8 280-82795-E-8 280-325289 280-325289 05/14/2016 06:40 1 05/14/2016 06:40 1 TAL DEN JNL TAL DEN JNL P:3005A A:6010B 280 -82795 -B -8-A 280 -82795 -B -8-A► 280-324565 280-324196 05/09/2016 08:05 1 280-324565 280-324196 05/10/2016 00:16 1 TAL DEN TEB TAL DEN SJS A:300.0 A:300.0 280-82795-A-8 280-82795-A-8 280-324600 280-324600 05/10/2016 18:38 1 05/11/2016 02:10 20 TAL DEN AFB TAL DEN AFB A:SM 2320E 280-82795-A-8 280-324592 05/09/2016 18:37 1 TAL DEN IEU A:Field Sampling 280-82795-A-8 280-324348 05/04/2016 15:40 1 TAL DEN K1 S Lab ID: 280-82795-9 Method Bottle ID Client ID: TW-D Sample Date/Time: 05/03/2016 11:00 Analysis Run Batch Received Date/Time: 05/05/2016 13:00 Date Prepared I Prep Batch Analyzed Dil Lab Analyst P:5030B A:8260B 280-82795-E-9 280-82795-E-9 280-325289 280-325289 05/14/2016 07:01 1 05/14/2016 07:01 1 TAL DEN JNL TAL DEN JNL P:3005A► A:6010B 280 -82795 -B -9-A► 280 -82795 -B -9-A 280-324565 280-324196 05/09/2016 08:05 1 280-324565 280-324196 05/10/2016 00:19 1 TAL DEN TEB TAL DEN SJS A:300.0 A:300.0 280-82795-A-9 280-82795-A-9 280-324600 280-324600 05/10/2016 18:56 1 05/11/2016 02:28 5 TAL DEN AFB TAL DEN AFB A:SM 2320E 280-82795-A-9 280-324592 05/09/2016 18:42 1 TAL DEN IEU Lab ID: 280-82795-10 Method Bottle ID Client ID: TRIP BLANK Sample Date/Time: 05/03/2016 10:00 Analysis Run Batch Received Date/Time: 05/05/2016 13:00 Date Prepared / Prep Batch Analyzed Dil Lab Analyst P:5030B A:8260B 280-82795-B-10 280-82795-B-10 280-325349 280-325349 05/15/2016 21:37 1 05/15/2016 21:37 1 TAL DEN JNL TAL DEN JNL TestAmerica Denver Page 86 of 98 A = Analytical Method P = Prep Method 05/16/2016 Quality Control Results Client: Waste Management Laboratory Chronicle Lab ID: MB Method Bottle ID Client ID: N/A Sample Date/Time: N/A Analysis Run Batch Prep Batch Job Number: 280-82795-1 Received Date/Time: N/A Date Prepared I Analyzed Dil Lab Analyst P:5030B A:8260B P:5030B A:8260B MB 280-325289/6 MB 280-325289/6 MB 280-325349/6 MB 280-325349/6 280-325289 280-325289 280-325349 280-325349 05/13/2016 21:03 1 05/13/2016 21:03 1 05/15/2016 12:51 1 05/15/2016 12:51 1 TAL DEN JNL TAL DEN JNL TAL DEN JNL TAL DEN JNL P:3005A A:6010B MB 280-324196/1-A MB 280-324196/1-A 280-324565 280-324196 280-324565 280-324196 05/09/2016 08:05 1 05/09/2016 23:31 1 TAL DEN TEB TAL DEN SJS A:300.0 MB 280-324600/6 280-324600 05/10/2016 11:24 1 TAL DEN AFB A:SM 2320E MB 280-324592/6 280-324592 05/09/2016 17:23 1 TAL DEN IEU Lab ID: LCS Method Bottle ID Client ID: N/A Sample Date/Time: N/A Analysis Run Batch Prep Batch Received Date/Time: N/A Date Prepared / Analyzed Dil Lab Analyst P:5030B A:8260B P:5030B A:8260B LCS 280-325289/4 LOS 280-325289/4 LOS 280-325349/4 LOS 280-325349/4 280-325289 280-325289 280-325349 280-325349 05/13/2016 2O:42 1 05/13/2016 20:42 1 05/15/2016 12:31 1 05/15/2016 12:31 1 TAL DEN JNL TAL DEN JNL TAL DEN JNL TAL DEN JNL P:3005A A:6010B LOS 280-324196/2-A LOS 280-324196/2-A 280-324565 280-324196 280-324565 280-324196 05/09/2016 08:05 1 05/09/2016 23:34 1 TAL DEN TEB TAL DEN SJS A:300.0 LOS 280-324600/4 280-324600 05/10/2016 10:49 1 TAL DEN AFB A:SM 2320E LOS 280-324592/4 280-324592 05/09/2016 17:13 1 TAL DEN IEU Lab ID: LCSD Method Bottle ID Client ID: N/A► Sample Date/Time: N/A Analysis Run Batch Prep Batch Received Date/Time: N/A Date Prepared / Analyzed Dil Lab Analyst A:300.0 LOSD 280-324600/5 280-324600 05/10/2016 11:07 1 TAL DEN AFB A:SM 2320E LOSD 280-324592/5 280-324592 05/09/2016 17:18 1 TAL DEN IEU Lab ID: MRL Method Bottle ID Client ID: N/A► Sample Date/Time: N/A Analysis Run Batch Prep Batch Received Date/Time: N/A Date Prepared / Analyzed Dil Lab Analyst A:300.0 MRL 280-324600/3 280-324600 05/10/2016 10:31 1 TAL DEN AFB TestAmerica Denver A = Analytical Method P = Prep Method Page 87 of 98 05/16/2016 Quality Control Results Client: Waste Management Laboratory Chronicle Lab ID: MS Method Bottle ID Client ID: N/A Sample Date/Time: 05/03/2016 07:40 Analysis Run Batch Job Number: 280-82795-1 Received Date/Time: 05/04/2016 09:25 Date Prepared / Prep Batch Analyzed Dil Lab Analyst P:5030B A:8260B P:5030B A:8260B 280-82718-X-1 MS 280-82718-X-1 MS 280-82923-Y-3 MS 280-82923-Y-3 MS 280-325289 280-325289 280-325349 280-325349 05/13/2016 21:48 1 05/13/2016 21:48 1 05/15/2016 13:30 1 05/15/2016 13:30 1 TAL DEN JNL TAL DEN JNL TAL DEN JNL TAL DEN JNL Lab ID: MSD Method Bottle ID Client ID: N/A Sample Date/Time: 05/03/2016 07:40 Analysis Run Batch Received Date/Time: 05/04/2016 09:25 Date Prepared / Prep Batch Analyzed Dil Lab Analyst P:5030B A:8260B P:5030B A:8260B 280-82718-X-1 MSD 280-82718-X-1 MSD 280-82923-Y-3 MSD 280-82923-Y-3 MSD 280-325289 280-325289 280-325349 280-325349 05/13/2016 22:09 1 05/13/2016 22:09 1 05/15/2016 13:49 1 05/15/2016 13:49 1 TAL DEN JNL TAL DEN JNL TAL DEN JNL TAL DEN JNL Lab ID: DU Method Bottle ID Client ID: N/A Sample Date/Time: 04/25/2016 10:58 Received Date/Time: 04/27/2016 09:40 Analysis Run Batch Date Prepared I Prep Batch Analyzed Dil Lab Analyst A:SM 2320E 280-82458-A-26 DU 280-324592 05/09/2016 17:32 1 TAL DEN I ED Lab References: TAL DEN = TestAmerica Denver TestAmerica Denver A = Analytical Method P = Prep Method Page 88 of 98 05/16/2016 ■o CD 00 co 0O TestAmerica Denver 4955 Yarrow Street Arvada, CO 80002 ! 1 1 1 7 sdfl 1 t71f i as xI Y!; 14.) 451 3 -7'i 7 Chain of Custody Record I Pr :fir 1 TestAmerica T'4 eIR 214 EnVIRONICILITAL TESTING • • ',lief •wr wat,• " wr ,h,.,.r - �_- t�t-j -�_ - - - - Yr - - - .. _ _• - •_ _.^_ _ .. _ - - -r _ ... ._. _ ._ .. _ _ .� a _.. ... -' •_ - - No: Sampler: /y. �4sb PM.: Carries Tre nd No;Sj : CO.C !Sara, Betsy A 280-51948-18774.1 Client Information CUe nt Cont&4 '' Mr. Torn Schweitzer Phone: 103 C 6.o E -Mail: betsy saragetestamericaincmcorri_ ; Page: m _ Company: Waste ManageMe't Analysis .. Requested Job It Address: { �•�j �4}� Avenue ��r//r�� :f41 West �}' Union -Y�U est 1.11 ;o ! A enu Due Date Requested: - - n � - xwv ' ;`%"k �;' • �' f�l L - J o 1 [ ��,� ,z,.�,�... S.C+ 5 Preservation Codes: L7 Hexane A ` 7 CL DA - i exane C ty Englewood TAT Requested (days): } �.: I Eli iiiiiiiiiiiii� �' <xT aNaOH N - None C -Zn Acetate Ci -As Ja0c Na2G4S State, Zip- r.r. I \\tillH limn"�y' ^rr �`'{ D - l`aitric Aid P - ` t .'/.I�,f a��{s _mi.. IF�hc�te: PO #fi y Y "°` i '' +.-:.E:-:� ;ter S - N2St"4 O -91 -'l `+J4' ( I e 303-914-1588(Fax) Order Requested .. - M } �280-82795 j Chan of Custody ..br *]H -Ascorbic Acid - � S�P��Do ecahy&ate f•,M:!'i S` 1 a , J{ l� �T - Ice -Acetone mal;: fit. EEmal;: Sch ei r cx wrnecom �(P�)urchase • 1 o t• Tv ` ~`T ,4iJ tra' u i i i l L ., a.•i� 11 ' '' " , • Y ,1 -Di Water v -i+ MCAA K- EDTA W - oh 4-5 Project Name: _ Projects 4 .•' i+ ! L - EZ7A Z - other (A) 28003044 log in "2O16" {p 588JN0� Weld - everything .,,� E "� Sip{.e�, Colorado .: • t I i � � i a 51 Other: YS, r - sample Type i Matrix ` J • , ALIth e , r�rd }� • f f.rr•V rte- �_.._ -T f 1 N r da F 'i./ L -M� i • { , YI 1 I Sample (omPa (r-11118. fc(!, ai ' ti)flimilg l 1 '1i� Sar le Identification Sample Date Time G g bl ST=Tissue, ue,� Air u:,'� ;: c 1 � 0 & l ! r r I•. Special itry.. Sl . I 1 _ '� _ \• aL,•Rhi� ... Lf �IIIJI I1 J Nµ r.M � A yyyy��r� • •1 _ ..' -� n� •, '• • ._ {{��2 •+i a.1,R\'r J� +Y.y M Y�r 111 N. N. , Y'{ I I• %1!''I / Mf l.>•a�l\. f '� }/1 �y _ tieR L -F L./. t_}l.�__��FFj�yy/f.��a-_v_%. } -- 45k"f 1,440. �'_ •A .J 4�� r• ♦.` ` +� Q .l.._i' ` • , I 1R o, a� lS e! .�i� . 3? r' a a� •': w Y 5,•' ti c �. • '•,.., - .rup; aw•• y.. �. #yam,€ � y:.. .. L f •tom/ ». R,:.' ��. ::J. '1••7{ "r „y, - ►�- 7..Art a v ;: L. �M Y. . Y • s 4{ y�+ : , �•jT .�'. Y� t �W. F.;Y .#>; .�' �.. S �i3i- .C ,..>� .. .. f } ;.,.. . . .1 „i ....w - ___. 1 �f�, �1� W,�f . "a'•' a �� ♦ a' —J�i+�4�'r � �, � .. r w k Y�"�' .. .•; 4 's Ai �� ,- _ 'I ri L.. i �...l�a._..- t: • w Ili i— l �f •f� - S�yr4 r - _ JX � wra/tT �4w Jw.F.IPr�" .4F'..'iJ•l �.%�i 0"1" ^ _ . Ywl• .d+olW�•rf Ii8�4�Jp74M�•Yllw'�Ih�f••!•Na w .... .W ,.•, .�rlN.^. y,. • i■•H4``T rl !•� _ .yS:✓. Kd - � • it __ —_ '""mow -� u u - IMF • J'''' inmi . la. era kfr Or 6 tit i 3 2-C 1 6?-. W IV Veil 1> r II, fI 4 �' no/6r- 9 Or 03 / 614 i I 5- if Cle bit) 'Pun I PI J III j a . I ger idi.4( e 4r art? ailli6 i rabp & r i VI 1 1 /4 i an.... -tors, ..... 6 ? ter/F43.06 i i 7 0 -e ->;:n • I d ` I k 1�irr , s I tier .r. a itisiott + 16I 15:5- Y i # "F tad I ' .err -pp.-11%a . 9 f or otpic 71‘ go (67 tau- ke; r 1 imOS : IR I la le in° c W Y te) Di ti 1 + ₹ ;may '�'" Y�{ t+ i i r ' �- Ilia . l b�'� �f i'�` �� i. I 'f + y ryr r '�"�1 11 ' f- 444, i ; ' ti j i l - i. Pus lble Hazard Identification Sample Dfs osa/ (A fee may be assessed if samples are retained longer than I' month) �.. = Iif �J - kn �r �o roar No Hazard F ammable Skin frrken Pf31S i�7 l� Flammable el rt Client Disposal By Lab Archive For Months _ Deliverable Reouested: I, [l, Elie IV, Other (specify) • Special Instructions/QC Requirements: at abet 7— i tor Cite_ ersiz iv LL -75. ir, crid 041 le - - Shipments Empty Kit Relinquished by: Date: Time: method of : Relinquisher! oy: , oate/T .e: I ornpany 3 -,, l : c.e' IT5{. Dattemrne:. a. I too CornDcan - 13o0 e A i ► / 6 .•- Frh , Relrnauished' . Y Danis urn . Company ce 'ed by: I£ :e/Time.. Company Relinquished by: i Dare/Time: - —•- - Company Racslved by Cate/Tine: Company Custody Seals intact: Custody Seal No..: C offer Ter.:peratu:re(s) C and Other R.i arks•4.61-ri `--clr r "` OS0 $ h 1 A Yes L►r No - FIELD INFORMAHON FORM Site Ai /o `>t'his 'Waste Management Held Information Form is Required sass mn�.�a333�3r+E; i anee:N., A -! 14, This form is to be completed, in addition to any State Forms The Field Form is Site Sample ...-` .` submitted along with the Chain of Custody Forms that accompany the sample Laboratory Ilse Only/Lab ID: '' `' t, t I No.: Point: 1 # containers (i.e, with the cooler that is returned to the laboratory). Sample lD M I: Irrl O 00 I: 1 I el l7 i 51 I I I 3°' ' Lill.., 00, 11 I Hsi O g .mt PURGE DATE 0.4 (MM DD YY) Note: For Passive Sampling, PURGE (2400 replace "Water TIME ELAPSED FIRS WATER Hr Clock) (hrsunin) Vol in Casing" and "Well Vols Purged" wi Water Vol in Tubing/Flow Cell dri VOL IN itetribtrilir and Tithing/Flow ._.L_Lir ACTUAL VOL PURGED WELL VOLs L 44esi) L PURGED Cell Vols Purged Mark changes, record field data, below W Purging and Sampling Equipment ... Dedicated: I Y I or tJ " Filter Device: Y or t N 0.45 or I I µ (circle or fi I I in) 1 Ai x dPurging Device I it J A -Submersible Pump D -Bailer A- In -line Disposable C -Vacuum r s li-Peristaltic Pump E"Piston Pump Filter Type: A B -Pressure X -Other Sampling Device I C J C -QED 13ladder Pump F-Dipper/Bottle Fii CP' A -Teflon C -PVC X -Other: filX-Other: I Sample Tube Type; B -Stain less Steel D -Polypropylene 14 Well Elevation ' (at TOC) Dep#h to ater (DT (ftlmsl) (from TOC) 1 `''� f 716Groundwater Elicitation (ft) (site datum, from Tot l (tlrnsl) 4 Total Well Depth (from TOC)isi-21: Stick Up (ft) (from ground elevation) a3 Casing Li.:4 Casing (ft) ID in) Material P v _ Pr Note: Dotal Well Depth, Stick Up, Casing W. etc. are optional and can be from historical data, unless required by Site/Permit Well Elevation, DTW and Groundwater Elevation must be cw'rent Sample (2400 ;tier, Time I-lr Clock) Rate/Unit n k 1 (Ze pH (std) ual t cc 1r Conductance (SCIEC) µrhosfcm@.25°C) Temp. et) Turbidity (ntu) T649i D10. (mg/L ,- ppm) 9 eD/ORP (tn ( ai DTW (ft) or _ _.. t i _.. - i i 1310 ILI 7i V i t i s f r J I [chi], 0 2"l ' 1 61 I ! ( f 4 ° I I LI 3 li i ? tuf 3 3 1 a : ea): el 4 ( - * 0 iti 57-3 f z. ? [t i ` s $'44t1j 7E-3 sit i j13 F :eel11� f I€, E •2,7 ( 10 3E 1 i Z ti; ) fII 1P 3 Ir6 1 E_ 4 :O 3i ol0 it i rATION DJ I e i1 t 3 t t E I I i , [ ni 3 c i E! E t . I I i I , I I E E 1• E t I i ! 1 i ' F i , ! 3 I , E i ! i t 1 3 t t ' } T I i 3 I 3 I I i s I I E 1 3I E I s ' _ I f 3 s 1 i I 3 I I ! ! 1 i 1 3 I_, Suggested range fa' 3 consce. readings or i?vke Fcrmitltate requiiett�en#s_ +/- U'2 _. +f- 3% _- .._ -- !i +/- 10% l +l- 5 my Stabilize t - 5tabilization Data Fields arc Optional (ii e. complete stabilization readings for parameters required by Whet Site, or State). These fields earn be used where four (4) field measurements are required fry State/Permit/Site. If a Data Logger or oilier Electronic formal is used, fill in final readings below and submit electronic data separately to Site. if more fields above are needed, use separate sheet or form. SAMPLE DATE pH CONDUCTANCE TEMP. TURBIDITY DO eli/ORP Other: NM DD YT) (std) Afttmhosicar @ 25°C) {° (n#u) Ong/Li-ppm) (my) Units *Lc1°Vdt 1� W., I HI in 1 Iticld R aclin s €ire re titretl (i.e. record field measurements, final stabilized readings, passive ,sample readings before sampling for oilfield parameters required by State/Permit/Site Sample Appearance: odor: A'o tf Color: C LC ot Other: Weather Conditions (required daily, or as conditions change): Direction/Speed: P / itlook: fil fr rr,` Precipitation: Y ore - Specific Comments (including ng purge/well volume calculations if required): i FLet ire 8 LV'ro psr ( `Z,... 1 c 1 „id t 6 Etc ite ittiE„ I( ar C mite U Zi_._. W amillialliaineibigne I certify that sampling procedures were in accordance with applicable EPA, State, and WM protocols (if more than one sampler, all should sign): / / _ here Zatedinv tirkvy Aids al t - -� / / (6 Date Mine Stgnntnr DISTRIBUTION: WIDTWORIGINAL - Stays with Sam Company ple, YELLOW - Returned to Client' PINK - Field Copy Page 90 of 98 TA-��4%13) tte FIELD INFORMATION FORM 1 la........_...4161"--� O.F/y sa..,._.sw This Waste Mann en;ent Field Information Form. is Required WASTR laNA4� = M5NT Name: ■■This form is to be completed, in addition to any State Forms. The Field Form is Site No• t Sample Point: I9.ati submitted along with the Chain of Custody Forms that accompany the sample ' containers (i.e, with the cooler that is returnedto the laboratory). Laboratory Use Only/Lab ID: , Sample ID list -4-51 I lc-0101310cl ols1 I ! H I I col Liiii-Al i .airs 1. 4411.2.4.1 PURGE DATE PURGE TIME ELAPSED HRS WATER OL I;T 1G ACTUAL VOL PURGED WELL VOLs (MM DD YY) Notes For Passive Sampling, replace "Water (2400 Hr Vol in Clock) casing" and "Well Vohs (hrs:min) Purged" wi Water Vol in Tubing/Plow Cell (lollies) and C (ordirits) in PURGED Tubing/Flow Cell Pals Purged, Mark changes, record field data, below. 4 Purging and Sampling Equipment ... Dedicated: V or fi r; Filter Device*.. '' or I N I 10.45 p 5 or I- J w (circle or fill in) - — w r► ►nr Purging Device � u A -Submersible Pump D -Bailer A - In -line E line Disposable C -Vacuum i l3 -Peristaltic Pump E -Piston Pump Filter Type: B -Pressure 3t -Other 5 Sampling Device [ tb.nr I C -QED B ladder Pump F-Dipper/Bottle g W A -Teflon C -PVC X -Other: X -Others Sample Tube Type: p yp l3 -Stain less Steel D 0-PolypropyleneAi 404 Emi Well Elevation (at TOC) _ _ Depth toWater (fit}ms1) (from ToC (DT's) ) tei ei ci GroundwaterElevation (if) (site datum, from TOC) pil il (ftfmsl) Total Well Depth T III ; 4 l(ft) Stick Up 31 Sal 4 Casing Casing P (from TOC)A (from ground elevation) .(ft) ID I (in) Material ,( Note Thtal Wen Depth, Stick Up, Casing Id etc are optional and can be jhnn historical data, unless r egtared by Site/Permit. Well Elevation, DIV, and Groundwater Elevation must be current Sannpie Time hate/Unit (2400 Hr Clock) Le pH (std) Conductance (SC/EC) Mrthosicin@•25°C) Temp. (°C) Turbidity D.O. eB/ORP Oita) (mg/1_,- ppm) (my) DTW (ft) i 13 ; IIIiI 1' 1st B iIk• I !lint 1 ess I l'ul2, 0,4, 211d (2 I cii a i IS i 9 i ri ctl 1 1 : el i elite, if 4, 4 Lin 112-s- I *g i! ;il'i 1,;() 3rd 6'119 Lk1n3ut i l E ill in' 4* 7Jb[O4. 1 2.1e I I 7 PLiiii 9 ;3 i 0 I r .k-4. , , -44 '-.._ I i IIII f I I I I g ! E �. l.. i I k L. I I L ' , E i { I 3 ' c ' L. 1 e I I lf I F l I 1 1 1if I I # t Suggested note Penult/State range for 3 consec. readings at requirements: +1- 0.2 +l- 3% — -- +1- 10% +1- 25 mV • Stabilize Stabilization Data Fields are Optional (i.e. complete stabilization readings for parameters required by WM, Site, or State). These fields can be used where four{ (4) field measurements are required by Stale/Permitaite. 1•fa Data Logger or other Electronicformot rs used, ftl! in final readings below and subpar electronic data separately to Site e gilds above are 11ee girt, llr to sheet or form dit SAMPLE DATE PH CONDUCTANCE TEMP. TURBIDITY DO eIiJORP Other: 1 (MM 0 D YY) (std) (iu hos/cin 25°C) (° ) (ntu) (s" � " lliif am ) ( an Units 2 0 O a 6 -I O o 1 Vil( % 9 d� 7 °c is ..D Final Field Readings are required (i.e, record field measurements', final stabilized readings, passive sample readings before sarpltng for all field parameters required by StatelPermu/Site. Sample Appearance: C te6A f Odor: Color: e. L EA/Zs Other: Weather Conditions (required daily, or as conditions change): Direction/Speed: i / u tit Outlook:. 5 re-" t Precipitation: y ore Specific Comments (including purge/well volume calculations if re€luired): En" 1 t ¢fit- cen 4 4 I certify that sampling procedures were in accordance with applicable EPA, State, and WM protocols (if more than one sampler, all should sign): 1 t v simmer- a-neciza._ .7" / / _...._ Date Name - _ DISTRIBUTION: WHITE/ORIGINAL - Sta Signature Company s with Sam le YELLOW - Returned to Client' PIN - Field Co age o TAL-8029WM (1013) FIELD INFORMA TIO FORM Hite f1,t0� Management Field Information Form is Rec uirecl WASTE ,�.�,I►oSI HT Name: 0 ElTlrisWaste This form is to be completed, in addition to any State Forms. The Field Form is Site No,: Sample Point:tro submitted along with the chain of Custody Forms that accompany the sample containers (i.e. with the cooler that is returned to the laboratory). Laboratory Use Only/Lab ID: Sample ID I iI o I 4i jail O I 3 ts. 3 (Do'4 8 PURGE DATE i:4 (MM DD VY) PURGE (2400 Hr TIME ELAPSED IBS WATER VOL IN CASDIC ACTUAL VOL PURGED WELL VOLs Clock) (his:rnin) -(-C ) (rig 'lt3 j" — PURGED Note: For Passive Sampling, replace "Water Vol in , Casing" and "Well Vols Purged" w/ Water Vol in Tithing/Flow Cell mid Mbnigff+dow cell Yoh Purged Mark changes, record field data, below Purging and Sampling Equipment ... Dedicated: U or l Filter Device; or LblI ' o.45 or I I p (circle co fill in) A E Purging Device I ` I A -Submersible Pump D -Bailer A -In -line Disposable C -Vacuum c iri B -Peristaltic Pump B -Piston Pump Filter Type: A B -Pressure X -Other cip i= Sampling Device 1 j C -{QED Bladder Pump F-Dipper/Bottle g W A-Teflon C -PVC X -Other: chi X-Othei;1: IR 1 Sample Tube Type: B -Stainless Steel D -Pty; ro lene Well Elevation (Rt TDC) CI Depth to Water (DTW) (fitlrnsl) (from TOC) I :I:Total Groundwater Elevation (I.) (site datum, from TOC)W (rtimsi) Well Depth (from TOG) I ° 641 Stick Up (fit) (from ground elevation) _.__iP" ,..31 I. ,..3, i t I al di I Casing I (ft) ID 7(in) Casing Material P _ V Cr Pr Note Total Well Depth, Stick l@, Casing .1d, etc. are optional and can be from historical data, unless required by S[te/Perr#it, Well Elevation, Dig and Groundwater Elevation must be current, Sample Time (2400 Hr Clock) Rate/Unit pH (std) Conductance (SC/EC) Temp. virkonhos/cm@25°C) (°C) Turbidity (ntu) D.O. (mg/L- ppm) eH/ORP (my) DTW (ft) I ILI 11 lb l6I id Ill t F V3W2-i;I4,1 it Silt r, "HierI_ I i ..r 3 l I 41 1 r4 a e, 2nd 1 a v43?2nd k 1 L t 1 S-16 9 i it • Y i 4 , 7 i ` !Ire !_.....1 ... t f NI Yer 5 i3 % A 0 1 E'''--� 3"� € r1 asl O i iti9; O ins i O nui .. ati- (6!(if eri a + i Itre7J �1 i isirt10 11.3 �{ I .." 2,1 ,�'` ti_... r� 1 1 l� `�. I i 1 7:o (. I# 13 (6 a _ 1 -s'' 3 I en i 0 I . t ps` 1 r BILIZATION I I ` i I k L I I I! ! 3 I s € A i I I_._ L i .. I k I IE i E I ! I I I1 i I e I i ! t I 3 E E E ! ! , i J I E e i s i 1 4 ! I 3 a II I I ` a f I4 E f E 3 11 I i Tj. 3 ! I 3 ] ! k EI ! ] I Suggested range for 3 consec. readings or note Permit/State requirements: +1- 0.2 +l- 3% -- -- +I- 10% 41-25 mfr' Stabilize Stabilization Data Fields are Optional `i e. complete .stabilization readings for parameters required by WA4, Site, or State). These fields can be used where four (4) field measurements are required by State/Perrrut/Sate. Ifs Data Logger or other Electronic format me riser', fill in final readings below and submit electronic data separately to Site. s ahovc arc needer a aa€�trfe sheet gar rr SAMPLE DATE pH CONDUCTANCE TEMP. TURBIDITY DO eH/ORP Other: (MM DD YY) (std) ltaslcxn @ 25°C) (°C) (nth) (ing/L-ppm) (mV) Units H1H (a k s" L t i�i I� el Final Field Readings are required (i•e, record field measurements, final stabilized readings, passive sample readings before sampling for all f Raid parameters required by State/Permit/Site, Sample Appearance: 5 L C Lo V V Odor: A' OP - Color: J 4- C cla Other; Weather Conditions (required daily, or as conditions change): Direction/Speed: ( 1 _./ ' ki Outlook: F V rev 9 Precipitation; y or 1 i Specific Comments (including purge/well volume calculations if required): s / ' tto-C UT 1 0 ran ft% cry e-c-cosi I r (1141.-fre tet. tra p c- inCtiA-freet * 4 7 r- el I as. , ---- - _. _.... . ___ ...._..... __ ._.. . _ .. . .. ?.._. --- cw) mi Isi ---.. w w - _ I certify that sampling procedures were in accordance with applicable EPA, State, and WM protocols (if more than one sampler, all should sign); i i a, _ 6 pEn RO PE& / / Date Name Signatire. DISTRIBUTION: WHITE/ORIGIN-AL - St �•„ t� T Coarpany OW - Returned to Client, PINK- Field Copy TAL-8029WM (0108) Site Name: Site No.: ,lam w L..p LtoPrAr•cgiew FIELD INFORMATION FORM Sample rt: Tie+ ° Far J Sample ID This Waste Mann ement Field Information Form is Re aired This form is to be completed, hi addition to any State Forms. The Field Form is submitted along with the Chain of Custody Forms that accompany the sample containers (i.e, with the cooler that is returned to the laboratory). IP J.sd b _I 1J PURGE DATE (Mtvi DD YY) i PURGE TIME 1r ELAPSED HRS a Aeon WATER VOL IN • ACTUAL VOL PURGED WELL VOLs I3 I. I§J (2400 Hr Clock) (hrs. m in) tteithiemi) (aailautoL PURGED Note, For Passive Sampling, replace "Water Foal in casing" and "Well VS Pigged" w! Water Vol in Tubing/Flow Cell and Tubing/Flow cell Yids Purged Mark changes, record field data, below Purging and Sampling Equipment ... Dedicated: Purging Device I C- I w Sampling Device X -Other: r C A -Submersible Pump D -Bailer B-Peristaltio Pump E -Piston Pump C -QED Bladder Pump F-Dipper/Bottle Filter Device: Om. I N I Filter Type: Sample Tube Type: p (circle or fill in) A - In -line n -line Disposable C -Vacuum S -Press ure X -Other A -Teflon C -PVC X -Other: B -Stainless Steel P3 -Polypropylene Well Elevation (at TOC) Total Well Depth (from TOC) Note • Total Well Depth, Slick Up, Casing Id or (ft/nisi) Depth to Water (DTW) (from TOC) Stick Up (ft) (from ground elevation) 3 I L� 31 i Groundwater Elevation (ft) (site datum, from TOC) (ft) Casing ID are aapizonal and can be}ivrn historical data, unless required by Site/Permit. Well Elevation, DTPV, and Groundwater Elevation tinest be current. LI Casing (in) Material (#timsl) Ato 0 Est 41 F*1 p OtaI� ran Sample Time (2400 Hr Clock) I 1 11 kit 6 I '1419 I 1 iSile i 113r16 t L I i F 1 P - I E � F � E 1 F . 4 E I R ! t I Rate/Unit t0 0,IsS J-1 F 14 r l I 1 3 I 1 1 E I I �od 3rd 4th Suggested range fur 3 couseed ieadings or note Permit/State Eequiremcnts- PU (std) 7jitinkr ist ■ I I I I +1- 0 2 Sad 4111 Conductance (SCi]C) 1l1ILL? 41ttt&,/.,,J L') ' 0 1 8, 2t$° 0kell gra? r 3 s . �9 Ole €eta 0 f E ! i E E E i 1 E 1 i t t { t , i i II I E I I E ! ! ! i +1-3% Temp. CC) I 6 y I L t i Min Stabilization Data Fields are Outk al, li e complete ,stabilization readings for parameters required by ll' by State/Permit/Site, If a Data Logger or other EIectiunic format is used, Jill in final readings below and submit electronic data separately to Site If inaare fields above are needed, usekseprnwte sheet or fQrm Turbidity (ntu) i 6 I tit; a 0 1ilo 91 gel 6 t r i io l I f '° 4 F J t F F I E E � ' I 1 E 3 l E a i 3 . 3 1 33 3 I 1 I a y I II 3 1 D.O. (mg/L - ppm) i I 1 3 t do I. alio I t d 3 2 l +1- 10% eH/ORP (mV) DTW () SAMPLE DATE (MM DD YY) . . irigict ;mgt liss. ig7 is., l !- i 1. l I . 1 I E : 1 I t t e E I I E 3 3 & E t 1 E I I I a-.. +1- 25 mY pIl CONDUCTANCE TEMP. TURBIDITY DO (std) g' mubosicnt ® 25°C) ("C) (alto ) (ing/L.-ppm) CI 0 o 6 1 Li Li 3 let, ti lo i 3 1._4,1 Final Field Readings are required 0.e. record field measurements, Purl stabilized readings, passive sample readings before sampling for all field parameters required by SlatelP td3 id '7 1 al 0 t 3 I I l I1 I I ! I ! ! 1 t I 1 ! f t 3 ; _ I _ ♦ e l I I l 1 I i 1 E i Stabilize efIJORP Other: (mY) Units _ z U Sample Appearance: $• Cifo V Odor: Weather Conditions (required daily, or as conditions change): "to erre- Color: Cr. L- , et Other: Direction/Speed: Air __ /0 frigritie Outlook: e l r r? Precipitation: Y or Specific Comments (including purge/well volume calculations if required): .- c t ctra Er c 6-L ru-At Lecr ra /1/2/ FA -net* von I jr- ',tire tam "ecerer 1 certify that sampling procedures were in accordance with applicable EPA, State, and WM protocols (if more than one sampler, all should sign): I f Q , 3r /6 Date flt- Name Signatu Company DISTRIBUTION: WHITE/ORIGINAL - Stays with Sample, YELLOW - Returned to Client. PINK - Field Ca �I 1 6t2016 TAL.-6029WM (1013) FIELD INFORMATION FORM Site Name: Site No.: I /VW 1,i= F. a Ref, rd i Sa mple Point: Irk4- k I6 Sample ID This Waste Mnnaaemenl� Information Form is. Reouired 'This form is to be completed, in addition to any State Forms. The Field Form is submitted along with the Chain of Custody Forms that accompany the sample containers (Le, with the cooler that is returned to the laboratory). WASTE MANAGEMENT Laboratory Use Only/Lab ID: i 71 I I J PURGE DATE PURGE TIME ELAPSED FIRS (MM DO PI) (2400 Hr Clock) (hrs: min) 'TV 61 W WATER VOL ii t GASIAIG renittenysit L dia 0 ACTUAL VOL PURGED 4r L WELL VOLs PURGED Notes For Passive Sampling, replace "Water Vol in Casing" and "Well Vole Purged" w/ Water Vol in Tubing/Flow Cell and Mb:Jig/Plow Cell Yale Purged Mark changes, record field data, below ral Et Z ot 044 Sampling Device CI g X -Other: Purging and Sampling Equipment ... Dedicated: I Y I or Purging Device C. A -Submersible Pump B -Peristaltic Pump C-QBD Bladder Pump D -Bailer E -Piston Pump FDDlipper/Bottle Filter Device: Filter Type: Sample Tube Type: D or N or p (circle or fill In) A -I n -Ii ne Disposable C -Vacuum B -Pressure X -Other A -Teflon B -Stainless Steel C -PVC X -Other: I3 -Polypropylene Well Elevation (at TOC) Total Well Depth (from TOG) r I 1 _ Depth to Water (DT) (ftlmal) (from TOC) Stick Up (I t) (from ground elevation) Ti? s (0) Groundwater Elevation (site datum, from TOC) l Casing Casing (ft) ID (in) Material Note. Total Neil Depth, Slick Up, Casing Id etc are optional and ccm be from historical data, unless requited by Srte/Permit. Well Elevation, DTW, and Groundwater Elevation must be current (ftlmsl) Sample Time 2400 Hr Clock 6:110 6p0 -a -d3 u' ir 6 i 4 Lrei 3 ! 3 3 ' i I 4 I 7 I I I I t I c l Rate/Unit e +y (Lir 1 ko ra/w" aze Suggested range for 3 conscc teat -hags of note Pennit/State requirements: pH (std) J C E e 1 Ii +1-02 2 8I. d 4111 Conductance (SC/EC) rhos/cin@J.25°C) I v 3 :3 0,11ttt;3 ' i fit 4 s e5— 0 tri ct T 1 0 I '"I I I I 1 i 1 i I I j I j U i f F I r I I I I +/- 3% Temp. (°C) eiy (3710 1 1/to I { err' n tz I I i Stabilization Data Fields -al-Optional ('1 e complete stabilization readings for parameters required by W by State/Pertnialte..lf a Data Logger or other Electronic -format is used, fill in final readings below and submit electronic data separately to Site. , f more fields above are needed, use ,sep_ffrate street err farm, Turbidity (atu) II ?i 9 I o 15F jlo [ j l I 0i LI e i ( i o i sal o c 1 0' ! VA E E 1 I 3 l I ! ' E 3 i c c i I I pe g I F I i e ! � i 3 E . 3 i ai 1 3 ! I i D.O. (tnL - ppm) 5T8p - I 1 gif E I5/ E E E s G c I +{- 10% eH/ORP (mV) DTW ern cab ! a i 2. es i iiity 3 raNisk de. 3 Iasi Pi I .,3t 4„,the its 1 pig ... t Pt:! E I k I 1 i ' I IIIIi 3 ' 3 +t- 25 mV I I I I I E i I ' I c i I I ! , 3 3 E a a ! i 1 � t i 3 A ... I I I A E I I t I f i c t 3 ! AI E Stabilize SAMPLE DATE (MM DD YY) itt Fri 41 I Flt nl ie(l Readings are required pH (.std) Ca istrIrt i.e. record field measurements, CONDUCTANCE mhoslcin @ 25°C) a TEMP. (c) Il le.Le; TURBIDITY (Mn) Ala %1°I DO (mg/14-p $ in) 7 y + 1hJORP Other: (mom Unit I limit stabilized readings, passive sample readings before sampling for all field parameters require LI b . tate/Perrint/Site. FIELD COMMENTS Sample Appearance: 5 t. C U) 4,J 47 Weather Conditions (required daily, or as conditions change): Odor: raft; Color: C LoGirketie Other: Direction/Speed: W/0 rite I le Outlook: Ai Orton Precipitation: X ore, Specific Comments (including purge/well volume calculations if required): Are esio of I ge as Grew are tree Sas 6 ca. (4 419 I certify that sampling procedures were in accordance with applicable EPA, State, and WM protocols (if more than one sampler, all should sign): / 5-11_,A1 Date Feat %targ Name Signature Company DISTRIBUTION: WHITWORIaGINAL - St # ys with igple,Y ,OW - Returned to Client, PINT - Field Co $.,,.,.,. Ems/e-6 any _�. 05114/2016 TAL-8029WM (1013) FIELD INFORMATION FORM Site Name; Site Na.; tviktrp Sa mpEle point: 0 Sample ID This Waste Management Field Information Form is Renuired This farm is to be completed, in addition to any State Forms. The Field Form is -submitted along with the Chain of Custody Forms that accompany the sample 'containers (i.e. with the cooler that is returned to the laboratory). t h t _Li l t00 P 4 PURGE DATE MO DDYY) >� H t1 W Ill 01/240 g Frl Purging and Sampling Equipment , , , Dedicated: Purging Device I ear A -Submersible Putnp B -Peristaltic Pump Sampling Device I C -QED Bladder Pump X -Other; qI3 Y PURGE TIME (2400 Hr Clock) $24 i 0 14l WASTE NIANAGIERINNT Laboratory Use Only/Lab ID: ELAPSED HRS ACTUAL VOL PURGED WELL VOLs (hrs:mu° ((JAW tg, •a ) L PURGED Note: For Passive Sampling, replace "Water Vol in Casing" and "Well ibis Purged" iv/ Water Vol in Trubing/. 'low Cell and 71:lung/Flow Cell Vvis Purged Mark changes, record field data, below U or ei D -Bailer E -Piston Pump F-Dipper/Pottle WATER VOL IN Filter Type: I Sample Tube Type: p (circle or fil I 1 n) A -In -line Disposable C -Vacuum B- Pressure X -Other A -Teflon C -PVC X -Other: B -Stainless Steel P -Polypropylene WELL DATA Well Elevation (at TOC) 1 Total Well Depth (from TOC) 9 IR Depth to Water (DTW) gyms!) (from TOC) (It) Stick Up (from ground elevation) Hdis-14-fl� I 310 (ft) Note _Total Total Well Depth, Stick Up, Casing Id etc are optional and can be from historical data, unless r g:tired by Site/Permit, Groundwater Elevation (site datum, from TOC) Casing ID in) Casing Material Pvc. (ftltnsl) Well elevation, DT* and Groundwater Elevation must be current, Sample Time Rate/Unit (2400 Hr Clock) 6 rs I4 loin's? icivirsz- I. i9;10 i PnJ1° - _19:51; 1 ; ' i • T • i l e 1 • ' t 1 Oar 4 tr tie Lr Suggested range for 3 cotisec. readings or note Permit/5tate Iec iniemcnts. PH (std) �J1IO _esCO_ bies6 I ' ■ U +1- 0.2 Conductance (SC/lC) O ,_,. Iivit ____%;:e__ _, leral i 1 .0 R 12r17 I j *. ict tr F 0 izif 9 lc( I. . rug i 3 I tic i 7ars14 [ I I I 1f} I E I i F 3 I E i ; € € 3 I +1- 3% Temp. (°C) t I 61 I t 4011 ijiS'3 ilktar 1 6, 0 i 2 Turbidity (lit) 411-10t O ii6i9ri io 6 ctil it, 6 F3 rap 10 6 I II -to Li E E E � E ! ; 1 j 1 ! E 3 ` 1 t I 1 3 E ! 3 j D.O. (tng/L . ppm) 6i to ` 310 i t€ ict I t 4 11 I E +l- 10% L _ ;Stabilization Data Fields are Optioiid 0 e complete stabilization readings for parameters required by IV by State/Permit/Site, If a Data Logger or other .Electronic format is used, _full in_, nal readings below and subunit electronic data separately to Site. snore l elrls r b n s e needed r • r i t is sheet or eH/ORP OW) DTW (ft) 1 x'31 14 I i ie 1 1 - %re 7 il' I Isla' i i co Lir 1 ..._ I F T f3 I l ! e E I L I I . L Ii ' ati +1-25 mV € kI. 3 ` e _. t ... E i ! A i E I i EE i ' I f - 1 3 l t - C I , I --' 4 1 ! ! I I E a I j ' ' i Stabilize 0 SAMPLE DATE (MM DDYY) a Y�l G pH (std) G lq CONDUCTANCE j4ynhos/ern @2?°C) 0 H t G 616 TEMP. DO (mg/L-p m) 92 a eHIORP Other: (my) Units _ y 5- 3 Final Field Readings ass required (s e record field measurements, final stabilized readings, passive sample readings before sampling for all field parameters required by State/Permit/Site, FIELD COMMENTS Sample Appearance: f C, - Weather Conditions (required daily, or as conditions change): Odor: At) tit Color:6 4447 ase 6/2,41Other: Direction/Speed: 5 1. "mem Outlook: ,f tr5 Specific Comments (including purgelwell volume calculations if required); ? I , I certify that sampling procedures were in accordance with applicable EPA, State, and WM protocols (if more than one sampler, all should sign): 1 as re'l ot (11 e lir cep,. Reentet itesakerev Date alone DISTRIBUTION: WHITE/ORIGINAL - S eale- er-7 ser Signature s with S Precipitation: Y or N Company le, ! LOW - Returned to Client NNE - Field Co J TAL-8029WM (1013) FIELD INFORMATION FORM Purging and Sampling Equipment ... Dedicated: 1 Y I or Purging Device Site Name: Site No.: ' 1&'vf/t.gS/ 04 'u i Sample Point: ra+-' U Sample III rIbis Waste ManagemenField Information Form Is Required This form is to be completed, in addition to any State Forms. The Field Form is submitted along with the Chain of Custody Forms that accompany the sample containers (i,e, with the cooler that is returned to the laboratory). WASTE MAMApUMBUIT Laboratory Use Only/Lab ID: o u 0 4 M gti PURGE DATE PURGE TIME ELAPSED IRS (MM DD YY) (2400 His Clock) (hrs WATER VOL IlsieeiWiffe ACTUAL VOL PURGED (UMW. L osniteilirr J _ WELL VOLs PURGED Note For Passive Sampling, replace "Water Vol in Casing" and "Well Vols Purged" w! Water Vol in Titbrng/Flow Cell and T Bing/Flow Cell Pois Purged. Mark changes, record field data, below N E1-2 114 ,4 Sampling Device I X -Other: 0.4 A -Submersible Pump D -Bailer B -Peristaltic Pump E -Piston Pump C -QED Bladder Pump F-Dipper/Bottle i Filter Device: or I Filter Type: Sample Tube Type:' l or p (circle or fill in) A -in -line Disposable C -Vacuum B -Pressure X -Other A -Teflon C- PVC K -either: B -Stainless Steel D -Polypropylene H p Well Elevation (at TOC) 1 Depth (cons!) (from TOC) to Water (DTW) Total Well Depth �- Stick Up (from TOC) 3, (ft) (from ground elevation.) Note Fatal Well Depth, Stick Up, Casing Id eic. are optional and can be from historical data, unless required by Site/Permit Well _Elevation, DTW,and Groundwater Elevation musi be current t� Groundwater Elevation (ft) (site datum, from TOC) tel 'in Casing Casing ID in) Material riv (ftimsl) 1� a 0 Eng 0 .44 con Sample Time (2400 Hr Clock) If 'IL..3. I'&;1 tri I : 6.44 42-ri 1, 1.'t!ir i ft, J E 3 a I a 3 , 3 3 1 , j 1 Rate/UsUnit Uro O F S 2n 3 Suggested range for 3 cotisec. readings or note Perma/State iequlemeuts t Y pH (std) 71 - we7-1 olCsi I i lilt e L 1 C rt +I- 0 2 2 Ili Conductance (SC/DC) hosicm@25°C) 1 1 4+ I rF Lii d il!I 1 ,may 7 k L 1, 1 •,I_ I y 1 s I �0 �fbp 2 net I I Witi 1 1 1 I I 1 ! ! I I i 1 E 1 r f I 1 ! + I T 1 3 I ! I -_- i .--— 1 +f-3% d Temp. (°C) 'I' 3 Lti; Sri I 13 :9 a 1 Ii _ i r It Stabilization Data Fields are Optional (t.e complete stabilization readings for parameters required by W; by State/Permit/Site. If a Data Logger or other Electronic format is used, fill tnfinal readings below and submit electronic data separately to .S/te. I more 1 • . above re • '? ed use .s Turbidity (ntu) :Rijf FkE , I F i [419%7 ! E it ',ari r I ictIrCre I ! a S a 1 E E @ S, E i 3 ! E 3 C r p 1 E ! ! i a -- D.O. (nig/L - ppm) 19 1 112 / fl9h ir 3 1 i l +1- 10% eH/ORP (mV) Mina 1 91 SI ..°7 'ttr#o +3 1 24 2_4, i1 Ic313 t ! I ' I E 1 = I ! 1 E 1 I 3 , E , c t • -f1- 25 inV DTW () i ! ! a 3 I I 1 + 3 I a I I I 1 1 I I 3 I £ E 1 3 ! ! I C 1 1 I .i [ E 1 I I 1 3 i Sy Stabilize 01112 SAMPLE DATE pH CONDUCTANCE TEMP, TURBIDITY DO ell/ORP Other: (MM DC VY) (std) i t mbos/cm 1 25°C) (¢�`) (ntu) (mglL-ppm) on/Ov Units Eel .94: 1, IA() WI I 41 7 V •fir' rj [ 1 1r Ills:131 I3in e i ld_Rendiitgs.arexequiret4 0.e record field measurements, final stabilized readings, passive sample readings before sampling for all field parameters required by Siate/Permnit/Site 4 0 1-4 Sample Appearance: Weather Conditions (requited daily, or as conditions change): Odor: Color: Other: Direction/Speed: Outlook: Specific Comments (including purge/weal volume calculations if required): °re' ifai% 2,o A frtde l - -� 2 6 11O Precipitation: Y or N O �' �'"' 3 ` Win / certify that sampling procedures were in accordance with( applicable EPA! State, and W r'I protocols (if more than true sampler, all should sign): t jef. Pr& Z -Care., itdrtit/ t "tl,, Date Name Signature Company DISTRIBUTION: WHITE/ORIGINAL - Sta s with Sam le, YELLOW - Returned to Client. PINK - Field Copy age .; 05/18/2018 TAL-8029WM (1013) FIELD INFORMAHON FORM Site This' asEc lt�ana eme t Field Information Form Is R� wired WASTE( MANAGeMENT Rf e' ily1t*� �'+'fteft/ This form is to be completed, in addition to any State Forms. The Field Form is Site No.: Hk Sample polo t t "� tt submitted along with the Chain of Custody Forms that accompany the sample containers (i.e. with the cooler that is returned to the laboratory). Laboratory Use Only/Lab I1 ; Sample _._. . lD102. 41 LLIAP° Se °di :di 1_64. 1 I 11 I Ssi 21 ._ir I : : ' ge Will I 0 i 4 WM 61._ O I S I 0 3 5 R PURGE DATE PURGE N TIME ELAPSED HRS WATER VOL IN a4i'wACTUAL VOL PURGED WELL VOLs (MM DD YY) (2400 lir Note: For Passive Sampling, replace "Water Vol In Clock) (lhrs:min) Casing" and "Well irols Purged" Suit Water Vol in Tubing/Flow Cell Wrgailak and Tubing/Plow vi(®alters) lar-PuRGED Cell Vols Purged Mark changes, record field data, below Purging and Sampling equipment.. , Dedicated: 1 Y or N Filter Device: ir Y or N 0A5 or I µ (circle or WI in) Purging Device U A -Submersible Pump D -Bailer A -In -line Disposable C -Vacuum p! R-Pcristaltic Pump E -Piston Pump Filter Type: 1 B -Pressure X -Other 14 ,. Sampling Device _..... Cr-e I C -QED Bladder Pump F-Dipper/Bottle 04 W A -Teflon C -PVC X -Other: -Other: I I Sample Tube Type: I B -Stainless Steel D -Polypropylene HWell Elevation it (at TOC) I1(ftlinsl) Depth to (irrolri 'TC Water (DTW) C� .• r 0 Groundwater Elevation (ft) (site datum, from TOC) (ftimsl) 14 A Total Well Depth (from TOC) 0 Stick Up (ft) (from ground elevation) Z. k Casing I (ft) ID 1 , Casing ittl Material ial PI, C _________ Note Total Well Depth, Stick Up, Casing Id. e€c. are optional arid can be, from historical data, unless requir e:1 by Site/Perrni€. Well Elevation, DTW, and Groundwater Elevation must be current Sample Time Rate/Unit pH Conductance (2400 Hr Clock) (std) raiimhos/cmet25°C) (SC/EC) Temp. Turbidity C) (°C ( D.D. ell/ORP DTW to ., to (my) (nom Ply ) (ft) ill lad r i lb , St / �. ! •NIN• 15C i l f DellIrt IS I - (41 I I I 3 I'' I• 6 ,D E 'f f� c iE i i y I tar (s tvi ,�.�r 2tuL&j21'7 Ild p ,:1(77. / ! flit '� I -4I g 1 in a3)IPL , , ie. k IP I' 31 2.4 3 / I v 0: I 1117 9i ?I'll i a ,/,:j vire [ al O [ 91 I i CLI 'd f it �Il� f 1es ; �>h ' '' 4 f,�.rE `'' i� 1 . L 3 i 1 1 2,. ! 1 ? t ti t € f I{ I i — - r 74 (z) ' 1 qi .A , I .,,! n 1+ 1 6 I I .0I 1 ci, I. 111.i .I l I 17 4 1 Z* E I I f i E * . . I I I EiE a i i 'I 1 S ' I p�p ! • I i `M 3I I i I f i I E-3 il--•i i {t 1 f i 1 I I I I j ' t } I E I I1 3 I I I , . -tom . - 3 i t I e t E {{ I 3 3 I F t 3 f 1 p E 1 1 3 ! I ! _ 3 Suggested range far 3 consec, readings or note PeiinitVState r trireinelits: +/- 0,2 +1- 3% -- -- +1- 10% +f- 25 nni Stabilize Stabilization Data Fields are Optional, (a e, complete stabilization readings for parameter's requta•id by WM, Site, or Stale) These fields can be used where four (4) field measurements arc required by State/Permitane if a Data Logger" or other Electronic format is used, fill room l readings below and submit electronic data separately try Site. ifm.ce_ields abrr�I�tcre neertErl, frs s �,rr�rrre ltn t r►r f_ , SAMPLE DATE pH CONDUCTANCE TEMP. TURBIDITY DO eH/ORP Other: -44 M (MM OD YY) (std) (Yf tnitos/ern ® 25°C) (°C`) (attu) (mg/L-p an) OW) Units CI 613h7 `i ( ig 11 6) �Y`91 I"7 6 �i O Final Fi..eld its arse required (r a record field measu€,ements, final stabilised readings, passive sample readings before sampling for all field parameters require S€ate/Permit/Site ,3 Sample Appearance: C Lk.o V 9e V Odor: (art Color: de s,. ' /.#0ther•, - 4 Weather Conditions (required daily, or as conditions change): Ditection/Speecl: - l WW/ Outlook: F's tatept 91 Precipitation: Y or N Specific Comments (including purge/well volume calculations if required): .,pia eri .rr, ' ins.-- 4774 0-kie --I ..(f"' 9 0 j z , fear Cie In pm -fit t, Rio P i f c w¢ otete; fi, CD r „rid . er i1 4 3 2 I certify that sampling procedures were in accordance with applicable ErA, State, and WM. protocols (if more than otte sampler, all should sign): / / JJr.....�.. $a fit( r/ o // (IY'/ 2 flr5 -2 41,,- r c v Q r ' M. • Date Name Signs. re > ► - __.. — -•-- DISTRIBUTION: WHIITE/ORIGINAL Stays with Sample, -- Company YEL ,OW - Returned to Client. ?INK - Field Co r Page 97 of 98 TAL-eD191NfJl {-R)1 3) Login Sample Receipt Checklist Client: Waste Management Login Number: 82795 List Number 'I Creator True,Joshua A Question Answer Comment Job Number: 280-82795-1 List Source: TestAmerica Denver Radioactivity either was not measured or, if measured, is at or below background The cooler's custody seal, if present, is intact. The cooler or samples do not appear to have been compromised or tampered with. Samples were received on ice. Cooler Temperature is acceptable. Cooler Temperature is recorded. COC is present. COC is filled out in ink and legible. COC is filled out with all pertinent information. Is the Field Sampler's name present on COC? There are no discrepancies between the sample IDs on the containers and the COC. Samples are received within Holding Time (Excluding tests with immediate HTs).. Sample containers have legible labels. Containers are not broken or leaking. Sample collection date/times are provided. Appropriate sample containers are used. Sample bottles are completely filled. Sample Preservation Verified There is sufficient vol. for all requested analyses, incl. any requested MS/MSDs VOA sample vials do not have headspace or bubble is <6mm (1/4") in diameter. If necessary, staff have been informed of any short hold time or quick TAT needs Multiphasic samples are not present. Samples do not require splitting or compositing. Sampling Company provided. Samples received within 48 hours of sampling. Samples requiring field filtration have been filtered in the field. Chlorine Residual checked. N/A True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True True N/A True True True True True True True True N/A TestAmerica Denver Page 98 of 98 05/16/2016 Rig Water Results March 2, 2016 Reviewyour project results through Tctd4ccs r Have a Question? cm, Ask— The rng-d Experth . 'Visit us at: www.testamerica.inc..com TestAmerica THE LEADER IN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING ANALYTICAL REPORT TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. TestAmerica Denver 4955 `arrow Street Arvada, CO 80002 Tel: (303)736-0100 TestAmerica Job I D : 280-80430-1 Client Project/Site: Swift River Environmental Services, LLC For: Swift River Environmental Services, LLC 26 West Dry Creek Circle Suite 470 Littleton, Colorado 80120 Attn: Mr. Steve Wampler „fait ie..- Authorized for release by: 3/18/2016 4:56:49 PM Betsy Sara, Project Manager II (303)736`0189 betsy.sara@testamericainc.com The test results in this report meet all 2003 NELAC and 2009 TNI requirements for accredited parameters, exceptions are noted in this report. This report may not be reproduced except in full, and with written approval from the laboratory. For questions please contact the Project Manager at the e-mail address or telephone number listed on this page. This report has been electronically signed and authorized by the signatory. Electronic signature is intended to be the legally binding equivalent of a traditionally handwritten signature. Results relate only to the items tested and the sample(s) as received by the laboratory. 7 Client: Swift River Environmental Services, LLC TestAmerica Job ID: 280-80430-1 Project/Site: Swift River Environmental Services, LLC Table of Contents Cover Page 1 Table of Contents 2 Definitions 3 Case Narrative 4 Detection Summary � Method Summary 6 Sample Summary 7 Client Sample Results $ Surrogate Summary 11 QC Sample Results 12 QC Association 16 Chronicle 17 Certification Summary 18 Chain of Custody 19 Receipt Checklists 20 TestAmerica Denver Page 2 of 20 3118/2016 Definitions/Glossary Client: Swift River Environmental Services, LLC TestAmerica Job ID: 280-80430-1 Project/Site: Swift River Environmental Services, LLC Qualifiers GC/MS VOA Qualifier Qualifier Description J Result is less than the RL but greater than or equal to the MDL and the concentration is an approximate value. X Surrogate is outside control limits Glossary Abbreviation These commonly used abbreviations may or may not be present in this report. xt Listed under the "D" column to designate that the result is reported on a dry weight basis °AR Percent Recovery CFL Contains Free Liquid CNF F Contains no Free Liquid DER Duplicate error ratio (normalized absolute difference) Dil Fac Dilution Factor DL, RA, RE, IN Indicates a Dilution, Re -analysis, Re -extraction, or additional Initial metals/anion analysis of the sample DLC Decision level concentration MDA Minimum detectable activity EDL Estimated Detection Limit MDC Minimum detectable concentration MDL Method Detection Limit ML Minimum Level (Dioxin) N C Not Calculated N D Not detected at the reporting limit (or MDL or EDL if shown) PQL Practical Quantitation ntitation Limit QC Quality Control RER Relative error ratio RL Reporting Limit or Requested Limit (Radiochemistry) RPD Relative Percent Difference, a measure of the relative difference between two points TEF Toxicity Equivalent Factor (Dioxin) TEQ Toxicity Equivalent Quotient (Dioxin) TestAmerica Denver Page 3 of 20 3/18/2016 Case Narrative Client: Swift River Environmental Services, LLC TestAmerica Job ID: 280-80430-1 Project/Site: Swift River Environmental Services, LLC Job ID: 280-80430-1 Laboratory: TestAmerica. Denver Narrative CASE NARRATIVE Client: Swift River Environmental Services, LLC Project: Swift River Environmental Services, LLC Report Number: 280-80430-1 With the exceptions noted as flags or footnotes, standard analytical protocols were followed in the analysis of the samples and no problems were encountered or anomalies observed. In addition all laboratory quality control samples were within established control limits, with any exceptions noted below. Each sample was analyzed to achieve the lowest possible reporting limit within the constraints of the method. In some cases, due to interference or analytes present at high concentrations, samples were diluted. For diluted samples, the reporting limits are adjusted relative to the dilution required. Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results. All holding times were met and proper preservation noted for the methods performed on these samples, unless otherwise detailed in the individual sections below. Sample Receiving The samples were received on 03/04/2016; the samples arrived in good condition, properly preserved and on ice. The temperature of the cooler at receipt was 0.2 C. Holding Times All holding times were met. Method Blanks The Method 8260E surrogate recoveries of 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4, 4-Bromofluorobenzene, Dibromofluoromethane and Toluene -d8 were above control limits for the Method Blank. Because the data are considered to be biased high and all target analytes in the Method Blank were non -detect above the reporting limits, corrective action was deemed unnecessary. All other Method Blanks were within established control limits. Laboratory Control Samples (LCS) All Laboratory Control Samples were within established control limits. Matrix Spike (MS) and Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD) All MS and MSD samples were within established control limits. Organics The Method 8260E surrogate recovery of Dibromofluoromethane was below control limits during the analysis of sample RIG TANK. Because the chromatograms exhibited clear evidence of matrix interference and all other quality control samples met acceptance criteria, corrective action was deemed unnecessary. TestAmerica Denver Page 4 of 20 3/18/2016 Detection Summary Client: Swift River Environmental Services, LLC Project/Site: Swift River Environmental Services, LLC TestAmerica Job ID: 280-80430-1 Client Sample ID: RIG TANK Lab Sample ID: 280-80430-1 Analyte Acetone Ch lorod i bromometha ne Chloroform Dichlorobromomethane a ne Result Qualifier 2.7 J 0.22 J 18 1.6 RL 14 1.0 1.4 1.4 MDL Unit 1.9 ug/L 0.17 ug/L 0.16 ug/L 0.17 ug/L Dil Fac D Method 1 8260B 1 8260B 1 8260B 1 8260B Prep Type Total/NA Total/NA Total/NA Total/NA Client Sample ID: BAILER BLANK Lab Sample ID: 280-80430-2 Analyte Toluene Result Qualifier 0.23 J This Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results. RL 1.0 MDL Unit 0.17 ug/L Dil Fac D Method 1 8260B Prep Type Total/NA TestAmerica Denver Page 5 of 20 3/18/2016 Method Summary Client: Swift River Environmental Services, LLC TestAmerica Job ID: 280-80430-1 Project/Site: Swift River Environmental Services, LLC Method Method Description 8260E Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Protocol Laboratory SW846 TAL DEN Protocol References: SW846 = "Test Methods For Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods", Third Edition, November 1986 And Its Updates. Laboratory References: TAL DEN = TestAmerica Denver, 4955 Yarrow Street, Arvada, CO 80002, TEL (303)736-0100 TestAmerica Denver Page 6 of 20 3/18/2016 Sample Summary Client: Swift River Environmental Services, LLC TestAmerica Job ID: 280-80430-1 Project/Site: Swift River Environmental Services, LLC Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID 280-80430-1 280-80430-2 RIG TANK BAILER BLANK Matrix Water Water Collected Received 03/02/16 13:45 03/04/16 09:56 03/02/16 10:40 03/04/16 09:56 TestAmerica Denver Page 7 of 20 3/18/2016 Client Sample Results Client: Swift River Environmental Services, LLC Project/Site: Swift River Environmental Services, LLC TestAmerica Job ID: 280-80430-1 Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Client Sample ID: RIG TANK Date Collected: 03/02/16 13:45 Date Received: 03/04/16 09:56 Analyte 1,1,1,2-Tetrach loroetha ne 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1,1,2,2-Tetrach ioroetha ne I,1,2 -T richlo roethane 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethene 1,1-Dichloropropene 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 1,2,4-Trichiorobenzene 1,2,4-Tri methyl benzene 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 1,2-Dibrom.oethane 1,2-Dichiorobenzene I,2 -D ich ioroethane 1,2-Dichloroethene, Total 1,2-Dichloropropane I,3,5-Tri methyl benzene 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1,3-Dichloropropane 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2,2-Dichloropropa ne 2-Butanone (M EIS) 2-Chlorotoluene 2-Hexanone 4-Chlorotoiuene 4-Isopropyltoluene 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIRK) Acetone Benzene Bromobenzene Brom oform Brom omethane Result Qualifier Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chiorobromornethane Chlorodi bramomethane Chioroethane Chloroform Chlorornethane cis -1,2-D ichloroethene cis-1,3-Dichloropropene Dibroomomethan+ Diohlorobromomethane Dichiorod ifl uorometha ne Ethylbenzene Hexachlorobutadiene 'so propylbenzene Methyl tent -butyl ether ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.7 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.22 J ND 18 ND ND ND ND 1.6 ND ND ND ND ND RL 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.5 1.0 1.0 5.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 6.0 1.0 5.0 1.0 1.0 5.0 10 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 t0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 5.0 MDL Unit 0.21 ug/L 0.16 ug/L 0.21 ug/L 0.27 ug/L 0.22 ug/L 0.23 ug/L Lab Sample ID: 280-80430-1 Matrix: Water D Prepared 0.19 0.21 0.33 0.21 0.15 0.47 0.18 0.15 0.13 O24 0.18 0.16 0.13 0.22 0.16 0.18 2.0 0.17 1.7 0.21 0.20 0.98 1.9 0.16 0.17 0.19 0.21 0.19 0.17 0.10 0.17 0.41 0.16 0.30 0.15 0.16 0.17 0.17 0.31 0.16 0.36 0.19 0.25 ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L uglL ug/L ug/L ugJL ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug,L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L uglL ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L Analyzed Dil Fac 03/14116 12:48 03/14/16 12:48 03/14/16 12:48 03/14/16 12:48 03/14/16 12:48 03/14/16 12:48 03/14/16 12:48 03/14/16 12:48 03/14/16 12:48 03/14/16 12:48 03/14/16 12:48 03/14/16 12:48 03/14/16 12:48 03/14/16 12:48 03/14/16 12:48 03/14/16 12:48 03/14/16 12:48 03/14/16 12:48 03/14/16 12:48 03/14/16 12:48 03/14/16 12:48 03/14/16 12:48 03/14/16 12:48 03/14/16 12:48 03/14/16 12:48 03/14/16 12:48 03/14/16 12:48 03/14/16 12:48 03/14/16 12:48 03/14/16 12:48 03/14/16 12:48 03/14/16 12:48 03/14/16 12:48 03/14/16 12:48 03/14/16 12:48 03/14/16 12:48 03/14/16 12:48 03/14/16 12:48 03/14/16 12:48 03/14/16 12:48 03/14/16 12:48 03/14/16 12:48 03/14/16 12:48 03/14/16 12:48 03/14/16 12:48 03/14/16 12:48 03/14/16 12:48 03/14/16 12:48 03/14/16 12:48 'I 1 1 1 1 'I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TestAmerica Denver Page 8 of 20 3/18/2016 Client Sample Results Client: Swift River Environmental Services, LLC Project/Site: Swift River Environmental Services, LLC TestAmerica Job ID: 280-80430-1 Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Client Sample ID: RIG TANK Date Collected: 03/02/16 13:45 Date Received: 03/04/16 09:56 Analyte Methylene Chloride rn-Xylene & p-Xylene Naphthalene n-Butylbenzene N-Propylbenzene o-Xylene sec-Butylbenzene Styrene tert-Butylbenzene Tetrachloroethene Toluene trans-1,2-aichloroethene trans -1, 3- Dichloro propene Trichloroethene Trichlorofl uorornetha ne Vinyl chloride Xylenes, Total Surrogate 1, 2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) Dibromo/luoromethane (Surr) Toluene -d8 (Surr) Result Qualifier ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND RL MDL Unit 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 %Recovery Qualifier Limits Client Sample ID: BAILER BLANK Date Collected: 03/02/16 10:40 Date Received: 03/04/16 09:56 Analyte 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1,1 ,2-T richloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethene 1,1-Dichloropropene 1,2,3-Trichlo robenzene I,2,3-Trichlo ropropa ne 1,2,4-Trichlo robenzene 1,2,4-Trirnethyl benzene 1,2-Dibrorno- 3-Chloropro pane 1,2-Dibromoethane 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1,2-Dichloroethane 1,2-D ichloroethene, Total 1,2-Dichloropropane I,3,5 -T ri methyl benzene I,3 -D ich lorobenzene 1,3-Dichloropropane 1,4-D ichlorobenzene 2,2-Dichloropropane 120 100 14 X 104 Result Qualifier ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 70 -127 78 -120 77-120 80 -125 0.32 0.34 0.22 0.32 0.16 0.19 0.17 0.17 0.16 0.20 0.17 ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L Lab Sample ID: 280-80430-1 Matrix: Water D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 03/14/16 12:48 1 03/14/16 12:48 1 03/14/16 12:48 03/14/16 12:48 1 03/14/16 12:48 1 03/14/10 12:48 1 ug/L ug/L ug/L 0.15 ug/L 0.19 ug/L 0.16 ug/L 0.29 ug/L 0.10 ug/L 0.19 ug/L RL MDL Unit 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.5 1.0 1.0 5.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.21 0.16 0.21 0.27 0.22 0.23 0A9 0.21 0.33 0.21 0.15 0447 0.18 0.15 0.13 0.24 0.18 0.16 0.13 0.22 0.16 0.18 ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L Prepared 03/14/16 12:48 1 03/14/16 12:48 1 03/14/16 12:48 1 03/14/16 12:48 1 03/14/16 12:48 1 03/14/10 12:48 1 03/14/16 12:48 1 03/14/16 12:48 1 03/14/10 12:48 1 03/14/16 12:48 1 03/14/16 12:48 1 Analyzed 03/14/16 12:48 03/14/16 12:48 03/14/16 12:48 03/14/16 12:48 Dii Fat 1 1 1 1 Lab Sample ID: 200-00430-2 Matrix: Water D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 03/14/16 13:07 1 03/14/16 13:07 1 03/14/16 13:07 1 03/14/16 13:07 1 03/14/16 13:07 1 03/14/16 13:07 1 03/14/16 13:07 1 03/14/16 13:07 1 03/14/16 13:07 1 03/14/16 13:07 - 1 03/14/16 13:07 1 03/14/16 13:07 1 03/14/16 13:07 1 03/14/16 13:07 1 03/14/16 13:07 1 03/14/16 13:07 1 03/14/16 13:07 1 03/14/16 13:07 1 03/14/10 13:07 1 03/14/16 13:07 1 03/14/16 13:07 1 03/14/16 13:07 1 TestAmerica Denver Page 9 of 20 3/18/2016 Client Sample Results Client: Swift River Environmental Services, LLC Project/Site: Swift River Environmental Services, LLC Te tAmerica Job ID: 280-80430-1 Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Client Sample ID: BAILER BLANK Date Collected: 03/02/16 10:40 Date Received: 03/04/16 09:56 Analyte 2-Butanone (M Eli) 2-Chlorotoiuene 2-Hexanone 4-Chlorotoluene 4-Isopropyltoluene 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) Acetone Benzene Bromobenzene Bromoform Bromornethane Carbon tetrachloride Chlarobenzene Chiorobromom ethane Ch lorodi brornornetha ne Chloroethane Chloroform Chlorornethane cis -1 ,2-Dichloroethene cis-1,3-Dichloropropene Dibromornethane Dich'iorobromometh ane Dichiorodifluorometha ne Ethylbenzene Hexach'Iorobutadiene Isopropylbenzene Methyl tart -butyl ether Methylene Chloride m-Xylene & p-Xylene Naphthalene n-Butylbenzene N-Propylbenzene o-Xylene sec-Butylbenzene Styrene tert-B utyl benzene Tetrachloroethene Toluene trans-1,2-Dichloroethene trans -1, 3- Dichloro propene Trichloroethene Tr ichlorofl uoromethane Vinyl chloride Xylenes, Total Surrogate Result Qualifier ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1r2-Dichlarnethane-d4 (Surr) 4-Bromafluorobenzene (Surr) Dibrarnafluararnethane (Surr) Toluene -d8 (Sarr) ND ND ND RL MDL Unit 6.0 1.0 5.0 1.0 1.0 5.0 10 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.23 ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 %Recovery Qualifier Limits 120 100 log 104 70- 127 78-120 77- 120 80-125 2.0 0.17 1.7 0.21 0.20 0.98 1.9 0.16 0.17 0.19 0.21 0.19 0.17 0.10 0.17 0.41 0.16 0.30 0.15 0.16 017 0.17 0.31 0.16 0.36 0.19 ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L Lab Sample ID: 280-80430-2 Matrix: Water D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 03/14/16 13:07 03/14/16 13:07 03/14/16 13:07 03/14/16 13:07 03/14/16 13:07 03114/16 13:07 ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L 1 1 1 1 1 1 03/14/16 13:07 1 03/14/16 13:07 1 03/14/16 13:07 - 1 03/14/16 13:07 1 03/14/16 13:07 1 03/14/16 13:07 1 03/14/16 13:07 1 03/14/16 13:07 1 03/14/16 13:07 1 03/14/16 13:07 1 03/14/16 13:07 1 ►3/14/16 13:07 1 03/14/16 13:07 1 03/14/16 13:07 1 03/14/16 13:07 1 03/14/16 13:07 1 03/14/16 13:07 1 03/14/16 13:07 1 03/14/16 13:07 1 03/14/16 13:07 1 0.25 ug/L 0.32 ug/L 0.34 tig/L 0.22 ug/L 0.32 ug/L 0.16 ug/L 0.19 ug/L 0.17 ug/L 0.17 ug/L 0.16 ug/L 0.20 ug/L 0.17 ug/L 0.15 ug/L 0.19 ug/L 0.16 ug/L 0.29 ug/L 0.10 ug/L 0.19 ug/L 03/14/16 13:07 03/14/16 13:07 03/14/16 13:07 03/14/16 13:07 03/14/16 13:07 03/14/16 13:07 03/14/16 13:07 03/14/16 13:07 03/14/16 13:07 Prepared 03/14/16 13:07 03/14/16 13:07 03/14/16 13:07 03/14/16 13:07 03/14/16 13:07 03/14/16 13:07 03/14/16 13:07 03/14/16 13:07 03/14/16 13:07 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Analyzed Dil Fat 03/14/16 13:07 03/14/16 13:07 03/14/16 13:07 03/14(16 13:07 1 1 9 9 TestAmerica Denver Page 10 of 20 3/18/2016 Surrogate Summary Client: Swift River Environmental Services, LLC Project/Site: Swift River Environmental Services, LLC TestAmerica Job ID: 280-80430-1 Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA Lab Sample ID 280-8O430-1 280-8O430-2 280 -8O447 -C-3 MS 280 -8O447 -C-3 MSD D LCS 280-31669914 MB 280-316699/5 Surrogate Legend Percent Surrogate Recovery (Acceptance Limits) 12DCE BFB DBFM TOL Client Sample ID (70-127) (78-120) (77-120) (80-125) RIG TANK 12O 1O0 14 X 104 BAILER BLANK 12O 1O0 109 104 Matrix Spike 116 96 101 96 Matrix Spike Duplicate 115 95 100 95 Lab Control Sample 97 96 92 97 Method Blank 147X 136X 137X 140X 12DCE = 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) BFB = 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) DBFM = Dibromofluorornethane (Surr) TOL = Toluene -d8 (Surr) TestAmerica Denver Page 11 of 20 3/18/2016 QC Sample Results Client: Swift River Environmental Services, LLC Project/Site: Swift River Environmental Services, LLC TestAmerica Job ID: 280-80430-1 Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Lab Sample ID: MB 280-316699/5 Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 316699 Analyte 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1,1,2,2-Tetrach loroethane 1,1 ,2-Trichloroethane MD MB Result Qualifier 1,1 -Lich to roetha ne 1,1-Dichioroethene 1,1 -Dish loropropene 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 1,2,3-Triohloropropane 1,2,4-Trichlo robenzene 1,2,4-Tri methyl benzene 1,2-D ibromo-3-Chloropropane 1,2-D ibromoethane 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1,2-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloroethene, Total 1,2-D ichloropropa ne 1,3,5-Tri methylbenzene 1,3-Dichlo robenzene 1,3-Dichloropropane 1,4-D ic'hlorobenzene 2,2-0 ich loropropa ne 2-Butanone (MEK) 2-Chlorotoluene 2-Hexanone 4-Chlorotoluene 4-Isopropyltoluene 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIRK) Acetone Benzene Brornobenzene Brorrroform Bromomethane Carbon tetra ch to ride Chlorobenzene Chlorobromomethane Chiorodi brornornetha ne Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane cis-1,2-Dichloroethene cis -1,3-D ichloropropene Dibromomethane Dich lorob romometh ane Dich lorod ifl uoromethane Ethylbenzene Hexachlorobutadiene Isopropylbenzene ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND RL 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.4 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.5 1.0 1.0 5.0 1.4 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 MDL Unit 1.0 6.0 1.0 5.0 1.0 1.0 5.0 10 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 to 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.21 0.16 0.21 0.27 0.22 0.23 0.19 0.21 0.33 0.21 0A 5 0.47 0.18 0.15 0.13 0.24 0.18 0.16 0.13 0.22 0.16 0.18 2.0 0.17 1.7 0.21 0.20 0.98 1.9 0.16 0.17 0.19 0.21 0.19 0.17 0.10 0.17 0.41 0.16 0.30 0.15 0.16 0.17 0.17 0.31 0.16 0.36 0.19 ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L Client Sample ID: Method Blank Prep Type: Total/NA D Prepared Analyzed Dil l Fac 03/14/16 08:19 03/14/16 08:19 03/14/16 08:19 03/14/1608:19 03114/16 08:19 03/14/16 08:19 03/14/16 08:19 03/14/16 08:19 03/14/16 08:19 03/14/16 08:19 03/14/16 08:19 03/14/16 08:19 03/14/16 08:19 03/14/16 08:19 03/14/16 08:19 03/14/1608:19 03/14/16 08:19 03/14/16 08:19 03/14/16 08:19 03/14/16 08:19 03/14/16 08:19 03/14/16 08:19 03/14/16 08:19 03/14/16 08:19 03/14/1608:19 03/14/16 08:19 03/14/16 08:19 03/14/16 08:19 03/14/16 08:19 03/14/16 08:19 03/14/16 08:19 03/14/16 08:19 03/14/16 08:19 03/14/1608:19 03/14/16 08:19 03/14/16 08:19 03/14/16 08:19 03/14/16 08:19 O3/14/16 08:19 03/14/16 08:19 03/14/16 08:19 03/14/16 08:19 03/14/16 08:19 03/14/16 08:19 03/14/16 08:19 03/14/16 08:19 03/14/16 08:19 03/14/16 08:19 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TestAmerica Denver Page 12 of 20 3/18/2016 QC Sample Results Client: Swift River Environmental Services, LLC Project/Site: Swift River Environmental Services, LLC TestAmerica Job ID: 280-80430-1 Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Lab Sample ID: MB 280-316699/5 Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 316699 Analyte Methyl tert-butyl ether Methylene Chloride rn-Xylene & p-Xylene Naphthalene n-Butylbenzene N-Propylbenzene o-Xylene sec-Dutylbenzene Styrene tert-Butylbenzene Tetrachloroethene Toluene trans -1 ,2-Dichloraethene trans-1,3-Dichloro propene Trichloroethene Trichlorofluoromethane Vinyl chloride Xyenes, Total Surrogate MB MB Result Qualifier ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1, 2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 4-Bromoffuornbenzene (Surr) Dibromofluorome thane (Burr) Toluene -d8 (Sun) ND ND ND MB MB %Recovery Qualifier 147 X Lab Sample ID: LCS 280-316699/4 Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 316699 Analyte 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,1-Dichioroethene 1,2-D'ichloropropa ne 1,3-Dichlorobenzene Benzene Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroform Dich lorobromometh ane Ethylbenzene Methylene Chloride Tetrach loroethene Toluene tra ns-1,2-Dichloroethene Trichloroethene 136 X 137 X 140 X RL 5.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 MDL Unit 0.25 0.32 0.34 0.22 0.32 0.16 0.19 0.17 0.17 ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ugf L 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.16 0.20 0.17 0.15 3.0 0.19 1.0 0.16 2.0 0.29 1.0 0.10 2.0 0.19 Limits 70-127 78 -120 77- 120 80-125 Spike Added 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 uL ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L Client Sample ID: Method Blank Prep Type: Total/NA D Prepared Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 03/14/16 08:19 03114116 08:19 03/14/16 08:19 03/14/16 08:19 03/14/16 08:19 03/14/16 08:19 03/14116 08:19 03/14/16 08:19 03/14/16 08:19 03114/6 08:19 03/14/16 08:19 03/14/16 08:19 03/14/16 08:19 03/14/16 08:19 03/14/16 08:19 03/14/16 08:19 03/14/16 08:19 03/14/16 08:19 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Analyzed Dli Fac 03/14/16 08:19 03/14/16 08:19 03/14/16 08:19 03/14/16 08:19 1 1 1 1 Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Prep Type: Total/NA LCS LCS Result Qualifier Unit 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.09 5.06 4.83 5.20 4.85 5.23 5.26 4.92 5.12 4.85 5.00 4.52 4.90 5.80 5.11 4.93 ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L %Rec. D %Rec Lim its 102 101 97 104 97 105 105 98 102 97 100 90 98 116 102 99 65-135 65-135 65-136 64-135 65-135 65-135 65-135 65-135 65 -135 65 -135 65 -135 54 -141 65 -135 65-135 65-135 65.136 TestAmerica Denver Page 13 of 20 3/18/2016 QC Sample Results Client: Swift River Environmental Services, LLC Project/Site: Swift River Environmental Services, LLC TestAmerica Job ID: 280-80430-1 Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Lab Sample ID: LCS 280-316699/4 Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 316699 Surrogate 1, 2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Sun) Dibromofluorometbane (Surr) Toluene -d8 (Surfs) LCS LCS %Recovery Qualifier Limits Lab Sample ID: 280-80447-C-3 MS Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 316699 Analyte 1,1,1-T 1-Trichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,1 -Dish ioroethene 1,2-Dichioropropane 1,3-Dichlorobenzene Benzene Carbon tetrachlodde Chlorobenzene Chloroform Dichiorobrornornethane Ethylbenzene Methylene Chloride Tetrachloroethene 97 96 92 97 Sample Sample Result Qualifier ND 4.9 ND ND 0.53 J 0.39 J ND 1.9 ND ND ND ND Toluene trans-1,2-Dichloraethene Triohloroethene ND ND ND 0.28 J 70_ 127 78 -120 77-120 80- 125 Spike Added 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 MS MS Surrogate % Recovery Qualifier Limits 1,2-Dichloraethane-d4 (Surr) 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) Toluene -d8 (Surr) 116 96 101 96 Lab Sample ID: 280-80447-C-3 MSD Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 316699 Analyte 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethene 1,2-bichloropropane 1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene Benzene Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroform Dichlorobromomethane Sample Sample Result Qualifier ND 4.9 ND ND 0.53 J 0.39 J ND 1.9 Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Prep Type: Total/NA MS MS Result Qualifier Unit 70. 127 78- 120 77-120 80 - 125 Spike Added 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.63 8.56 4.16 4.70 4.35 4.95 4.65 5.68 4.82 4.63 3.98 4.37 3.93 5.05 4.54 4.40 ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug1L ug/L ug1L ug1L ug1L ugf L ugf L ug/L ug/L Client Sample ID: Matrix Spike Prep Type: Total/NA %Rec. D %Rec Limits 93 73 83 94 76 91 93 76 96 93 80 87 79 101 91 82 65_ 135 65.135 65-136 64-135 65.135 65-135 65-135 65-135 65-135 65-135 65.135 54-141 65 -135 65 - 135 65.135 65 - 135 Client Sample ID: Matrix Spike Duplicate Prep Type: Total/NA MSD MSD Result Qualifier Unit 5.05 8.84 4.67 5.17 4.69 5.40 5.03 5.97 ND 5.00 5.24 ND 5.00 ---- 5.05 ug/L ug1L ug1L ug/L ug&L ug&L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L %Rec. D %Rec Limits 101 79 93 103 83 100 101 82 105 101 65-135 65-135 65-136 64-135 65-135 65-135 66-136 65-135 65-135 65-135 RPD RPD Limit 9 3 12 10 8 9 8 5 8 9 20 21 20 20 20 20 21 20 20 20 TestAmerica Denver Page 14 of 20 3/18/2016 QC Sample Results Client: Swift River Environmental Services, LLC Project/Site: Swift River Environmental Services, LLC TestAmerica Job ID: 280-80430-1 Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Lab Sample ID: 280-80447-C-3 MSD Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 316699 Analyte Ethylbenzene Methylene Chloride Tetrach Ioroethene Toluene trans -1,2- Dich Ioroethene Trichloroethene Surrogate 1, 2-Dichloraethane-d4 (Sun) 4-Brornofluoriobenzene (Sun) Dibromofluorome thane (Surr) Toluene -d8 (Sun) Sample Sample Result Qualifier ND ND ND ND ND 0.28 J Spike Added 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 MSD MSD %Recovery Qualifier Limits 115 95 100 95 Client Sample ID: Matrix Spike Duplicate Prep Type: Total/NA MSD MSD Result Qualifier Unit 70-127 78 - 120 77-120 80-125 4.34 4.93 4.25 5.45 5.02 4.84 ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L %Rec. D %Rec Limits 87 99 85 109 100 91 65 -135 54-141 65 -135 65 -135 65 -135 65 -135 RPD RPD Limit 9 12 8 8 10 10 20 26 20 20 24 20 TestAmerica Denver Page 15 of 20 3/18/2016 QC AssocIation Summary Client: Swift River Environmental Services, LLC Project/Site: Swift River Environmental Services, LLC TestAmerica Job ID: 280-80430-1 GC/MS VOA Analysis Batch: 316699 Lab Sample ID 280-80430-1 280-80430-2 280-80447-C-3 MS 280-80447-C-3 MSD LCS 280-316699/4 MB 280-316699/5 Client Sample ID RIG TANK BAILER BLANK Matrix Spike Matrix Spike Duplicate Lab Control Sample Method Blank Prep Type Total/NA Total/NA Total/NA Total/NA Total/NA Total/NA Matrix Water Water Water Water Water Water Method 8260E 8260E 8260E 8260E 8260E 8260E Prep Batch TestAmerica Denver Page 16 of 20 3/1812016 Lab Chronicle Client: Swift River Environmental Services, LLC TestAmerica Job ID: 280-80430-1 Project/Site: Swift River Environmental Services, LLC Client Sample ID: RIG TANK Date Collected: 0310211613 :45 Date Received: 03/04/16 09:56 Lab Sample ID: 280-80430-1 Matrix: Water Batch Batch DiI Initial Final Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis 8200E 1 20 mL 20 rnL 316699 03/14/16 12:48 DPI TAL DEN Client Sample ID: BAILER BLANK Date Collected: 03/02/16 10:40 Date Received: 03/04/16 09:56 Lab Sample ID: 280-80430-2 Matrix: Water Batch Batch DiI Initial Final Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis 8260E 1 20 mL 20 rnL 316699 03/14/16 13:07 DPI TAL DEN Laboratory References: TAL DEN = TestAmerica Denver, 4955 Yarrow Street, Arvada, CO 80002, TEL (303)736-0100 TestAmerica Denver Page 17 of 20 3/18/2016 Certification Summary Client: Swift River Environmental Services, LLC ProjecUSite: Swift River Environmental Services, LLC TestAmerica Job ID: 280-80430-1 Laboratory: TestAmerica Denver All certifications held by this laboratory are listed_ Not all certifications are applicable to this report. Authority A2LA A2LA Alabama Alaska (UST) Arizona Arkansas DEC) California Connecticut Florida Georgia - --- ---- Illinois Iowa Kansas Louisiana Maine Minnesota Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New York North Carolina (WW/SW) North Dakota Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania South Carolina Texas USDA Utah Virginia Washington West Virginia DEP Wisconsin Wyoming (UST) Program DoD ELAP ISO/IEC 17025 State Program State Program State Program State Program State Program State Program NELAP State Program NELAP State Program N ELAP NELAP State Program NELAP State Program NELAP N ELAP NELAP State Program State Program State Program NELAP N ELAP State Program NELAP Federal NELAP NELAP State Program State Program State Program A2LA * Certification renewal pending - certification considered valid_ EPA Region Certification ID 2907.01 2907.01 4 40730 10 UST -30 9 AZ0713 6 88-0687 9 2513 1 PH -0686 4 E87667 4 N/A 5 200017 7 370 7 E-10166 6 02096 1 CO0002 5 8-999-405 9 CO0026 1 205310 2 CO004 2 11964 4 358 8 R-034 6 8614 10 4025 3 68-00664 Expiration Date 10-31-17 10-31-17 09-30-12 * 04-05-16 12-19-16 06-01-16 08-31-16 O9 -3O-16 06-30-16 01-09-17 04-30-16 11-30-16 04-30-16 06-30-16 03-03-17 4 72002001 6 T104704183-15-11 P330-13-00202 8 3 10 3 5 8 CO00026 460232 C583 354 999615430 2907.01 12-31-16 07-31-16 04-28-16 06-30-16 04-01-16 12-31-16 01-09-16 * 08-31-16 01-09-17 07-31-16 01-09-16 * 09-30-16 07-02-16 07-31-16 06-14-16 08-03-16 11-30-16 08-31-16 10-31-17 TestAmerica Denver Page 18 of 20 3/18/2016 1!estAm e rica u E Temperature on Receipt a H W I- z LU z 0 CC 5 W CC W 0 W W I Yes Li No LI Drinking Water? TAL-4124-280 (0508) JV.O z 460 U ins • OPt 1,4 t t N, 16 ; IND o Lab Number S ti 41/4 Sk) `sr V `) S L t C) VI 0 to b 1 , g (O - 1f1- 48 eel 245 ca -a (i) z (4. D its ci O 12 0 cl.t% `1J _ O2& loVEC • 0 U U U in E P P I Ls_ _ik4.... cu trNai C1 f } _ 3 U) Q. P — yr C � �CAA j ce II Q r- H t ' 3. Received By kA C ID L T L 5 i i 2. Received By Rue) 04 ail c 0 A ra I- -3. Relinquished By Date Time rIsni Cu 1 tit) �y l Chl ti 21 Days Cr 11 *1 .� ` ❑ 0 z co 24 Hours P E U ❑ 0 et 0 CC W L� 0 CC DISTRIBUTION: Page 19 of 20 3/18/2016 Login Sample Receipt Checklist Client: Swift River Environmental Services, LLC Job Number: 280-80430-1 Login Number: 80430 List Number: '1 Creator: Pottruff, Reed W Question Answer Comment List Source: TestAmerica Denver Radioactivity either was not measured or, if measured, is at or below N/A background The cooler's custody seal, if present, is intact. True The cooler or samples do not appear to have been compromised or True tampered with. Samples were received on ice. True Cooler Temperature is acceptable. True Cooler Temperature is recorded. True COC is present. True COC is filled out in ink and legible. True COO is filled out with all pertinent information. True Is the Field Sampler's name present on COC? False NA: Not requested on COC There are no discrepancies between the sample IDs on the containers and True the COC. Samples are received within Holding Time (Excluding tests with immediate True HTs).. Sample containers have legible labels. True Containers are not broken or leaking. True Sample collection dateltimes are provided. True Appropriate sample containers are used. True Sample bottles are completely filled. True Sample Preservation Verified True There is sufficient vol. for all requested analyses, incl. any requested True M S/MSDs VOA sample vials do not have headspace or bubble is <6mm (1/4") in True diameter. If necessary, staff have been informed of any short hold time or quick TAT True needs Multiphasic samples are not present. True Samples do not require splitting or compositing. True Sampling Company provided. True Samples received within 48 hours of sampling. True Samples requiring field filtration have been filtered in the field. True Chlorine Residual checked. N/A TestAmerica Denver Page 20 of 20 3/18/2016 H dro eologic Characterization December 2016 North Weld Landfill Unit APPENDIX E LABORATORY PERMEABILITY RESULTS 152047 FINAL Permeability Testing Back Pressure Saturated - Flow Pump ADVANCED :.}..-• , . PERMEABILITY TEST - BACK PRESSURE SATURATED - FLOW PUMP METHOD ASTM D5084 Method D CLIENT Swift River Environmental Services I IJOB NO. 2952-2 PROJECT North Weld Landfill Expansion PROJECT NO. 152047 BORING NO. NWE-12 DEPTH -- SAMPLE NO. -- LOCATION -- SAMPLE TYPE Shelb Tube SAMPLED TEST STARTED TEST FINISHED CELL NUMBER PERMEANT CONF. PRES. - 03/30/2016 04/07/2016 5P Water 720 By: -- By: CAL By: CAL MOISTURE / DENSITY DATA I BEFORE TEST I I AFTER TEST Wt. Soil + Moisture - (9) 514.64 601.25 Wt. Wet Soil & Pan - (g) 528.80 615.41 Wt. Wt. Dry Soil Lost Moisture & Pan - (g) - (g) 476.76 52.04 476.76 138.65 Wt. of Pan Only - (g) 14.16 14.16 Wt. of Dry Soil - (g) 462.60 462.60 Moisture Content - (%) 11.2 30.0 Wet Density - (pcf) 100.3 123.1 Dry Density - (pcf) 90.1 94.7 Init. Init. Diameter Area - (sq - (in) in) 2.761 5.987 Init. Vol. Vol. Height Bef. After Consol. - (in) Consol. - (cu ft) - (cu ft) 3.266 0.01132 0.01077 i Porosity - (%) 45.46 FLOW PUMP CALCULATIONS Pump Setting (gear number) 1 1.09E-01 2.857 2.880 0.128 42.017 1.240 100 Percentage O Height - (cc/s) of - (in) Pump Setting Diameter - (in) Pressure - (psi) Area after consul, - (sq cm) Gradient Permeability Permeability k - (cm/s) k - (m/s) 2.1E-03 2.1E-05 78.0 83.0 4.936 Back Cell Ave. Pressure Pressure Effective - - (psi) Stress (psi) - (psi) 22.2 Average temperature degree - (c°) Data entry by: CKP Date: 04/08/2016 Date: pVII /2oit Checked by: &,tt FileName: 2952_2 _ HarvardFlowPump-Perm-ASTMD-5084-R3_0.xls Page 1 of 3 ATE ao% MNcto • PERMEABILITY TEST - BACK PRESSURE SATURATED - FLOW PUMP METHOD ASTM D5084 Method D CLIENT Swift River Environmental Services I IJOB NO. 2952-2 PROJECT PROJECT BORING NO. NO. North 152047 NWE-12 Weld Landfill Expansion SAMPLED -- By: -- TEST STARTED 03/30/2016 I By: CAL TEST CELL FINISHED NUMBER 04/07/2016 5P By: CAL DEPTH -- SAMPLE NO. -- .SAMPLE LOCATION TYPE -- Shelby Tube PERMEANT Water PRES. - (psf) 720 - rCONF. i _ SATURATION DATA Cell Press. Back Press. Burette Reading (cc) Press. Pore (psi) (psi) (psi) Close Open Close Open Change B 40.0 38.0 6.6 26.0 50.0 48.0 27.1 28.3 38.7 46.1 7.4 0.74 60.0 58.0 1 28.4 29.3 48.7 56.9 8.2 0.82 70.0 68.0 29.5 30.3 58.7 67.8 9.1 0.91 80.0 78.0 30.4 31.1 68.7 78.1 9.4 0.94 90.0 31.3 31.4 78.7 88.3 9.6 0.96 CONSOLIDATION DATA Elapsed Time (Min) SQRT (Min) Time Burette Reading (cc) Volume Defl. (cc) A 0.00 i 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.50 1.30 -1.30 0.5 0.71 1.35 -1.35 1 1.00 1.40 -1.40 2 1.41 1.50 -1.50 4 2.00 1.50 -1.50 9 3.00 1.60 -1.60 16 4.00 1.60 -1.60 30 5.48 I 1.70 -1,70 60 7.75 1.70 -1.70 120 10.95 1.85 -1.85 240 15.49 1.90 -1.90 360 18.97 1.90 -1.90 Initial Height - (in) 3.266 Height Change - (in) 0.409 Ht. After Cons. - (in) 2.857 Initial Area - (sq in) 5.987 Area After Cons. - sq in 6.513 _ I n it. Vol. - (cc) Vol. Change - (cc) Cell Exp. - (cc) Net Change - (cc) Cons. Vol. - (cc) 320.49 28.10 12.57 15.53 304.96 FileName: 2952_2_HarvardFlowPump-Perm-ASTMD-5084-R3_0.xls Page 2 of 3 ITT PERMEABILITY TEST - BACK PRESSURE SATURATED - FLOW PUMP METHOD ASTM D5084 Method D CLIENT Swift River Environmental Services I IJOB NO. 2952-2 CONSOLIDATION NWE-12,--,-- DATA 0.00 0 T-02 1 - -0.4 40.6 U -0.8 O p B Time in Minutes J -� u. W a in -1.2 D o > -1.4 0.5 .5 1 II MINN, 9 16 -1.6 i 30 60 -1.8 120 240 360 -2 - - 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 SQUARE ROOT OF TIME IN MINUTES FileName: 2952_2_HarvardFlowPump-Perm-ASTMD-5084-R3_0.xls Page 3 of 3 ATT Preliminary Flow Pump Test Data ASTM D5084 ADVANCED TERRA TESTING Client: Swift River Environmental Services Job Number: 2952-2 Project: North Weld Landfill Expansion Location: Project Number: 152047 w VI E tie 3.0E-03 2.9E-03 2.8E-03 2.7E-03 2.6E-03 2.5E -O3 2.4E-03 2.3E-03 2.2E-03 2.1E-03 2.0E-03 0.0 Data Entered By: CAL en w w n c i rsj Boring Number: NWE-12 Depth: -- Sample Number: -- Sampled Date: -- Test Date: 4/712016 en 0 a es; en k to Average last 4 values 2.6E-03 1.0 2,0 time (minutes) Date: 417/2016 File Name: 2952_2_RrelimPerm_ASTMD-5084-methodD-R1_0.xls Sampled By: -- Technician: CAL 3.0 4.0 Checked By: Date: QAClient Data File\2952\2TICTUREDSCF6170.JPG 'Depth Sample Noir Location v ADVANCED a •, PERMEABILITY TEST - BACK PRESSURE SATURATED - FLOW PUMP METHOD ASTM D5084 Method D CLIENT Swift River Environmental Services I JOB NO. 2952-2 PROJECT PROJECT NO. 152047 North Weld Landfill Expansion SAMPLED STARTED -- 3/30/2016 By: -- By: CAL BORING DEPTH SAMPLE NO. NO. NWE-7 \TEST -- -- TEST FINISHED 4/12/2016 By: CAL CELL NUMBER 12P PERMEANT CONF. PRES. - (psf) Tap 720 Water LOCATION -- SAMPLE TYPE Shelby Tube BEFORE I AFTER MOISTURE / DENSITY DATA I TEST i TEST Wt. Soil + Moisture - (g) 575.98 674.95 Wt. Wt. Wet Soil Dry Soil & & Pan - (g) Pan - (g) 590.22 534.17 689.19 534.17 Wt. Lost Moisture - (9) 56.05 155.02 Wt. of Pan Only - (g) 14.24 14.24 Wt. of Dry Soil - (g) 519.93 519.93 Moisture Wet Content Density - (pcf) - (%) 101.1 10.8 124.1 29.8 Dry Density - (pcf) 91.3 95.6 Init. Init. Diameter Area - (sq - (in) in) 2.822 6.255 Init. Vol. Vol. Porosity Height Bef. After - - (in) Consol. Consol. (%) - (cu ft) - (Cu ft) 3.470 0.01256 0.01199 45.67 FLOW PUMP CALCULATIONS Pump Setting (gear number) 1 Percentage of Q - (cc/s) Pump Setting 1.09E-01 100 3.455 2.763 0.068 38.675 Height - (in) Diameter Pressure Area after Gradient Permeability - - (in) (psi) consol. k - (em/s) - (sq cm) 0.545 5.2E-03 5.2E-05 Permeability k - (m/s) Back Cell Ave. Pressure Effective Pressure - - (psi) Stress (psi) - (psi) 103.0 4.966 98.0 21.5 Average temperature degree - (c°) Data entry by: NN (Date: 04/13/2016 Checked by: edite Date: pat 2_1°/6 FileName: 2952_2_Ha rvard FlewPumy-Perm-ASTM D-5084- R3_1.xis Page 1 of 3 eia _ ADVANCED ' e,..i:. •..• PE PERMEABILITY TEST - BACK PRESSURE ASTM D5084 SATURATED Method - FLOW D PUMP METHOD CLIENT Swift River Environmental Services I IJOB NO. 2952-2 . PROJECT PROJECT NO. North 152047 Weld Landfill Expansion SAMPLED -- By: -- BORING DEPTH SAMPLE LOCATION SAMPLE NO. NO. TYPE NINE -- -- -- Shelby -7 Tube TEST TEST _CONF. CELL PERMEANT STARTED FINISHED NUMBER PRES. - (psf) 3/30/2016 4/12/2016 12P Tap 720 Water By: CAL By: CAL SATURATION DATA Cell Press. Back Press. Burette Reading (cc) Pore Press. (psi) (psi) (psi) Close Open Close Open Change B 40.0 38.0 5.4 26.5 50.0 48.0 28.4 29.6 38.7 43.7 5.0 l 0.50 60.0 58.0 29.5 30.6 48.6 55.2 6.6 0,66 70.0 68.0 30.7 I 31.7 58.6 - 66.4 7.8 0.78 80.0 78.0 31.5 32.4 68.7 77.0 8.3 0.83 90.0 88.0 32.6 33.4 78.7 87.7 9.0 0.90 100.0 98.0 33.4 - 34.1 88.8 97.9 9.1 0.91 110.0 34.4 34.6 98.7 a , 108.3 9.6 0.96 - - - - . . CONSOLIDATION DATA Elapsed Time (Min) SQRT Time (Miry) Reading Burette (cc) Volume Deft. (cc) 0.00 0.25 120 240 360 0.5 1 2 4 9 16 30 60 10.95 15.49 18.97 0.00 0.50 0.71 1.00 1.41 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.48 7.75 0.50 1.60 1.65 1.65 1.70 1.75 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.85 1.90 1.95 1.95 0.00 -1.10 -1.15 -1.15 -1.20 -1.25 -1.30 -1.30 -1.30 -1.35 -1.40 -1.45 -1.45 Initial Height Ht. After Height Change Cons. - (in) 3.470 - (in) 0.015 - (in) 3.455 Init. Vol. Cell Vol. Change Exp. - (cc) 355.72 - (cc) 31.25 - (cc) 14.99 Initial Area - (sq in) 6.255 Net Change - (cc) 16.26 Area After Cons. - sq in 5.995 Cons. Vol. - (cc) 339.46 _ FileName: 2952_2_HarrrardFlowPump-Perm-ASTMD-5084-R8_1.xls Page 2 of 3 T r PERMEABILITY TEST - BACK PRESSURE SATURATED - FLOW PUMP METHOD dayamarirs.RA 7tS14:4ti ASTM D5084 Method D CLIENT Swift River Environmental Services I IJOB NO, 2952-2 I CONSOLIDATION NWE-7,--,-- DATA 0.00 9 ,ta- -0.2 -0.4 i -0.6 t 0 p O Time in Minutes N r IJ2a 2Vun1OA I - 0.26 0.51 9 16 ■ 30 60 -�_�___� 120 - I .V 0 2 4 6 8 SQUARE ROOT 10 OF TIME IN 12 MINUTES 14 16 18 20 FileName: 2952_2 HarvardFlowPump-Perm-ASTMD-5084-R3 1 xls Page 3 of 3 ATT Preliminary Flow Pump Test Data ASTM D5084 ADVANCED TERRA T'ES1ING Client: Job Number: Project: Location: Project Number: 152047 Swift River Environmental Services 2952-2 North Weld Landfill Expansion Boring Number: NWE-7 Depth: Sample Number: -- Sampled Date: Test Date: 4/12/2016 le Am Sampled By: Technician: CAL 5.3E-03 5.2E-03 5.2E-03 7 5.1E-03 5.1E-03 - 5.0E-03 - 5.0E-03 0.00 nn 0 in 9 in 0 w 0 Lri Average last 4 values 5.0EO3 m 0 Lic en 0 w 0 in 0 0 LA in 0 0 LA 1.00 time (minutes) 2.00 3.00 Data Entered By: CAL Date: 4/12/2016 File Name: 2952,2,Prelimperm_ASTMD-5084-methodD-R1_1.xls Checked By: Pittki Date:' /a Client Job No. 2'IS a- BoringNo.. xiwf -'7 Depth -re Semple No. -� Looatlan J4f• . "•" Project Project No. /6tociti Date Testedi8y +- ttea I.(I I eme- Test Type"V/Me a ' # Confining Stale& 5 pi, i Q:\Client Data Fi'ie\2 52\2\PICTURE\DSCF6171.JPG -;- H dro eologic Characterization December 2016 North Weld Landfill Unit APPENDIX F SLUG TEST DATA 152047 FINAL SWIFT RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, LLC ... An Alaska Native Corporation ... 26 West Dry Creek Circle, Littleton, CO 80120 0 (303) 695-4660 CALCULATION SUMMARY SHEET PROJECT NUMBER: 152047 Page 1 of 6 PROJECT NAME: NWLF Expansion DATE: 5/25/16 CALCULATION NUMBER: Revision: 1 SUPERSEDED BY CALCULATION NUMBER: Revision: DESCRIPTION OF CALCULATION: Slug Test Analyses for Hydrogeologic Report REFERENCES USED: Number of References Attached: 1)Data collected by PAZ and SLW (May 4 - 5, 2016) 2) AQTESOLV v 4.5 REVIEW COMMENTS: CALCULATION MADE BY: PAZ CALCULATION CHECKED BY: EMF CALCULATION REVISED BY: PAZ CALCULATION REVIEWED BY: SLW DATE: 5/25/16 DATE: 6/3/16 DATE: DATE: 6 6 16 FINAL DESTINATION: File 1 CALCULATION Purpose This calculation presents the test setup, analysis and results of slug testing performed in Test Wells installed at the North Weld Landfill Expansion. Approach A slug constructed of weighted PVC was used in the testing. The slug was constructed of 1 inch ID PVC, filled with sand and sealed with end caps. An eye bolt was fixed to one end of the slug to allow for the attachment of the lifting line. The slug dimensions were: Outer diameter slug body 1.25 inches by 46 inches long: End caps diameter 1.5 inches in diameter by 1.375 inches long (2 end caps) Volume = tr*46*(.2 /2)tt2+2*1t' 1.375*(1..5/2)' 2 = 56.45+4.86=61.31 cu inches During the testing, the slug was completely submerged or completely removed from the water within the well casing. The slug produced a theoretical rise or drop in the water level in the well equal to the volume displaced by the slug. This is calculated from the comparison of the slug volume to the well cross sectional area. Each of the tested wells was 2 inch inner diameter. The well area is calculated as: Area = Tr*(2 /2) A 2 =3.14 sq inches The theoretical rise then is: Rise = 61.31/3.14 = 19.5 inches = 1.63 feet In the cases where the static water level was below the top of the screen, a correction factor must be applied to the theoretical HO. With a borehole diameter of 8.25 inches and an assumed filter pack porosity of 30 percent, the theoretical rise is: Borehole Area = it*(8.25/2)x`2 =53.46 sq inches The open area (3.14+O.3*(53.643.14))=18.29 So the theoretical rise is: Rise = 61.31/18.29 = 3.35 inches = 0.28 feet An In -Situ Level Troll 700 15 psig vented transducer (Serial number 345480) was used for the tests. The transducer was connected by USB to a laptop PC in the field using 3 cables, each 50 feet in length. The software program WinSitu 5 was used to collect and store the data from the test. During the test, the data could be downloaded and graphed to observe test progress and to determine when the water table had returned to pre-test conditions. 2 The process for the test was to first measure the depth to water. The transducer was then lowered into the water table to a depth approximately 8 feet or more below the water table. This depth was selected to avoid possible contact between the lowered slug and the transducer during the test. After the transducer was lowered, the data was reviewed on the screen to confirm the transducer was communicating with the PC. Next, the slug was lowered so the bottom of the slug was approximately 1 to 2 feet above the water table in preparation for the Slug In, or Falling Head test. The slug test identification and test parameters, including sampling time interval was set up in the software, and the signal was given to smoothly and quickly lower the slug as the test was initiated. In general, the test data collection was initiated about 1 second before the slug was lowered into the water to ensure the peak rise in water level was recorded. Despite attempts to minimize splashing, some water level oscillation is observed in the test data. The test was continued until the water level had returned to about 0.05 feet of the pre-test water level. The test was then stopped, and a new test set up for the removal of the slug (Slug Out, or Rising Head Test). The test sequence was then to initiate the data collection about 1 second before the slug was quickly removed from the water. To reduce the chance of disturbing the transducer cable, the slug was only removed until it was clear of the water table, then tied off downhole until the test was completed. Tests Performed The testing was performed in 6 of the 8 wells installed in 2016 at the NWLF Expansion. Slug in and slug out testing was performed in wells TW-4, TW-5, TW-6, TW-8, TW-9 and TW-10. Two wells (TW-1 and TW-2) could not be tested because of insufficient water depth in the well, and wells TW-3 and TWIT -7 were not installed during the Hydrogeologic Investigation because shallow water was not encountered during drilling in those locations. A summary of the depth to water and well construction details are shown below. Table 1: Depth to Water and Well Construction Details Depth Well Screen Screen Sand Pack Stick DTW DTW Satd Well Drilled Bottom Bottom Top Top Up TOC BGS Thickness Name ft bgs ft bgs ft bgs ft bgs ft bgs ft ft ft ft TIN -04 104 103.5 103.2 88.2 84.4 3.17 a 88.70 85.53 18.47 TIN -05 49 49 48.7 28.7 25.5 3.19 a 37.89 34.70 14.30 TIN -06 109 109 108.8 93.8 90.5 3.33 50.59 47.26 61.74 TIN -08 104 92.3 92 72 69 3.00 45.76 42.76 61.24 TIN -09 49 49 47 32 29 2.67 42.58 39.91 9.09 TIN -10 98.5 97.8 97.5 77.5 73.8 2.50 56.33 53.83 44.67 Saturated thickness is water table to depth drilled. 3 Wells in which no tests were performed had insufficient water level to allow the transducer to be placed with a fully submerged slug. Data The data were downloaded from the transducer to Comma Separated Values files for analysis. The data sets are included in Appendix 1 of this calculation. Boring logs of the wells are included in this calculation. Analysis The data were analyzed using the Bouwer Rice method included in the AQTESOLV program. Well construction and aquifer properties are input to the program for each well tested. The transducer data is directly read into the program, and then adjusted by the depth of the transducer in the water column to show the rise or fall in water level developed by the insertion or removal of the slug. The aquifer and well construction details are input to AQTESOLV. A summary of the data is as follows where: • HO = The theoretical rise (or fall) from slug being immersed (or removed) from static water table (ft) • d = The depth from static water table to screen top ft). This value is 0 if water table is below top of screen (presented as negative value in Table 2 to show the wells with water level below top of screen and modified screen length calculation). • L = Screen length if water table is above the top of the screen (ft) • Modified b = The saturated length of screen if the water table is below the top of screen (ft) • rc = casing radius, all wells were 2 inch diameter PVC, so rc = 1 in • rw = well screen radius, all wells were 2 inch diameter PVC, so rw = 1 in • rsk = borehole radius, the borehole was 8.25 inches, so rsk = 4.125 inches • Correction H0* =not used in the Bouwer Rice corrections; • ne = effective porosity of the filter pack (unitless) • b=Aquifer thickness • H = Static water column in well The definitions are shown in the attached figures from the AQTESOLV program.. 4 Aquifer/Agquitarc Properties General 1 Aquitard 1 Double Porosity 1 Aquifer Da static water level or aquifer top I{a b Kh aquifer base —Aquifer Saturated Thickness b: OFgat Ft Unconfined Aquifers: Measure b from confining unit at aquifer base to the static water level. Confined Aquifers: Measure b from confining unit at aquifer base to confining unit at aquifertop. rHydraulic ConductivityAnisotropry Ratio OK 1 Cancel p DUI Help TW-1Q Slug Out II Symbols General 1 Aquifer 1 Screen Curves 1 Radius 1 Correction 1 Observations Options static water level or aquifer top 3.67 l2� aquifer base d = depth to top of well screen (open or perforated interval) L = length of well screen (open or perforated interval) Measure all depths from watertable (unconfined aquifers) or upper confining layer (confined aquifers) Transducer Depth T: 20.567 ft OK Cancel I elpply I Help r �y � j- t T�r'ii -10 y '� V li l 1 Symbols General 1 Aquifer I 1 Screen Curves Radius I Correction Options I I Observations I - Effective Casing Radius Data Tests) (Slug r ply correction for effective casino radius: n(e): 0 Method: Bouwer-Rice (137€) Hfr: 1 - Frictional Well Data -Loss illApply correction for frictional (viscous) well loss Inematic wisevsityr: 1.2e -006 rnrlsec Gravitational acceleration: S. 80565 rnfsec2 OK j Cancel Appl' Help - 5 f TW-10 Slug Out atail Symbols General 1 Aquifer 1 OK u Screen Curves IRadius 1 Correction Options Observations H{0) = observed initial displacement (change in water level Thom static) H =static water column height -Well Name Name: TW-1DD Slug Out - Well Coordinates X: 7: D ft l Cancel Help TVW-1O Slug Out lar Symbols I General 1 Aquifer 1 Screen Curves Radius ICorrection Options 1 Observations 'Ac' In _ rieq}: 1" ft ft aquifer top or static water level rf: 0 ft — fitter pack 1 r{sk): 4.125 Ft aquifer base r(c) = inside radius of well using r(eq) a radius of downhole equipment rip) =inside radius of packer r(w) = radius of well (open or perforated interval) risk) = outer radius of well skin (disturbed zone enveloping filter pack) OK Cancel Help TW-10 Slug Out Symbols General 1 Aquifer Screen Curves Radius 0bs. No. Time (sec) splacement I Wig a 1, 0.25' 0.611 d 2 0.001 3 0.831 0.008 4 1.051 0.004 5 1.271 0.006 - 6 1.5 0.849 7 175 2.511 8 2 2991 - 9 2.25 1.909 10 2.5 0.654 = I V I Correction Insert Row ,add Rows... Select All Options Observations Delete Copy Paste Import... I Search... Alters... Math... OK I Cancel A ppl}' Help Table 2: AQTESOLV Input Data HO modified Correction Well theoretical H d L L rc rw rsk HO* ne Name ft ft ft ft ft in in in TW-04 1.63 17.97 2.67 15 15.00 1 1 4.125 NA NA T W-05 L63 14.30 —6.00 20 14.00 1 1 4.125 NA 0.3 TW-06 1.63 61.74 a 46.54 a 15 a 15.00 1 1 4.125 NA s NA TW-08 L63 49.54 29.24 20 20.00 1 1 4.125 NA NA TW-09 1.63 9.09 —7.91 15 7.09 1 1 4.125 NA 0.3 TW-10 a 1.63 43.97 a 23.67 20 20.00 1 1 4.125 NA NA H is water column in well d is depth of water above screen [negative if water table in screen] L is Screen length Modified L is saturated screen length. The output of the analysis includes a graph of the data and the analytical results. The hydraulic conductivity values are summarized: Table 3: Results Well Hydraulic (cm/sec) Conductivity Notes Test Slug In 6.15E-3 Screened in Fox Hills Fm TW-4 T-4 Slug Out 7.54E-3 Screened in Fox Hills Fm T-5 Slug In 1.90E-2 Screened in Laramie Fm Slug Out 5.13E-3 Screened in Laramie Fm T-5 Slug In 2.06E-2 Screened in Fox Hills Fm TW-6 TW-6 Slug Out 1.88E-2 Screened in Fox Hills Fm Slug In 2.54E-3 T-8 Screened in Laramie Fm T-8 Slug Out 2.13E-3 Screened in Laramie Fm Slug In 2.02E-1 Screened sparse, suspect in alluvium and beginning Laramie Fm. Data of test was missed noisy, TW-9 Slug Out 1.38E-1 TW-9 Screened in alluvium and Laramie Fm. TW-1O Slug In 1.68E-3 Screened in Laramie Fin Slug Out 1.89E-3 Screened in Laramie Frn TAN -10 Summary The results of the testing showed relatively high permeability material, greater than previous tests performed at the site. A review of the well logs show relatively long screen lengths through sandy materials (SM and SP), with interspersed clay layers. 6 APPENDIX B-3 NATIONAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE (NRCS) WEB SOIL SURVEY (WSS) CUSTOM SOIL RESOURCE REPORT FOR WELD COUNTY COLORADO, SOUTHERN PART, NORTH WELD LANDFILL APPENDIX C ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS APPENDIX C-1 LEACHATE HEAD ON LINER CALCULATIONS (HELP ANALYSIS) Golder Associates CALCULATIONS Date: November 18, 2016 Project Non: 1538880 Site Name: North Weld Landfill Unit 2 EDOP Weld County, Colorado Subject: APPENDIX D -el: LEACHATE HEAD ON LINER CALCULATIONS (HELP MODEL ANALYSIS) Made by: ALB Checked by: DVS 95 Reviewed by: JAR 1.0 OBJECTIVES Perform hydrological modeling of Unit 2 of North Weld Landfill (NWLF) to model leachate generation and corresponding hydrologic performance of the alternative liner system. Estimate maximum leachate head buildup on the alternative liner system and maximum impingement rates through the alternative liner system. Confirm that the proposed drainage layer will result in less than 12 inches of head on the alternative liner system at all times. 2.0 METHODOLOGY Use the Hydrologic Evaluation of Landfill Performance (HELP) Model, version 3.07 (USACE 1997), to model the hydrologic performance of the alternative liner system and leachate collection system within the Unit 2 expansion. Model various waste depth and cover configurations assumed to represent the most critical typical operational scenarios anticipated to occur throughout the life of the landfill from a leachate-generation standpoint. Evaluate the sensitivity of the HELP model results to changes in operational input parameters. 3.0 INPUT PARAMETERS 3.1 Operational Scenarios The following waste depths and cover configurations were initially modeled to identify the most critical operational scenarios from a leachate-generation standpoint: • Scenario 1: 6 feet of waste with daily cover (1 year weather generation); ■ Scenario 2: 70 feet of waste with daily cover (1 year of weather generation); II Scenario 3: 70 feet of waste with intermediate cover (10 years of weather generation); and • Scenario 4: 154 feet of waste with final cover (30 years of weather generation representative of post -closure period) i:\15\1538880\0400\0402 edop dit nov16\aypendix c engineering caiculations‘c-1 - help\1538880 app c-i Ihb 18nov16.docx Golder Associates Inc. 44 Union Boulevard, Suite 300 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Tel: (303) 980-0540 Fax: (303) 955-2080 www.golder.com Golder Associates: Operations in Africa, Asia, Australasia, Europe, North America and South America Golder, Golder Associates and the GA globe design are trademarks of Golder Associates Corporation HELP MODEL ANALYSIS Page 2 of 2 Project No.: 1538880 Made by: ALB Site Name: North Weld Landfill, Unit 2 EDOP Checked by: DVS Date: November 18, 2016 Reviewed by: JAR at:r 3,2 Meteorological Data Meteorological data for the Landfill site was synthetically generated using the synthetic weather generator (WGEN) developed by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Agricultural Research Service (ARS) and built into the HELP model. Statistical characteristics for synthetic weather data generation were adopted from Cheyenne, Wyoming, the nearest city to the site with published values in the program's default database. Default average monthly precipitation and temperature data for Cheyenne, Wyoming, was used for the synthetic generation of daily data. Daily solar radiation and evapotranspiration data were synthetically generated based on the latitude for Ault, Colorado (40.59° N). 3.3 Alternative Liner System 3.3.1 General Design Inputs The following is a list of the general input parameters used in the HELP analysis: • The length and slope of the landfill floor was modeled at 845 feet and 2.64%, based on the maximum leachate flow path length within the leachate collection drainage layer and considering the maximum estimated consolidation of foundation soils; • The compacted cohesive soil liner consists of 24 inches of on -site low -permeability soil; • The granular leachate collection drainage layer consists of six inches of coarse -grained sand; • Daily and intermediate cover soils consist of on -site eolian deposit material (sandy clay loam) encountered within the proposed excavation depth for the development of the Unit 2 subgrade; • 100% of the waste area was allowed to have runoff, with an SCS runoff curve number (CN) of 85; • The waste surface was assumed to be bare ground (i.e., Leaf Area Index of 0); and 1 The evaporative zone depth was limited to the thickness of the cover material modelled. 322 HELP Material Layers Material properties were referenced from site -specific geotechnical data from the Report of Geotechnical Investigation (Swift River 2016) and correlated to default HELP model soil textures, with user -defined properties input to reflect specific material requirements, where appropriate. Material properties used in the HELP analysis are listed below from bottom of the alternative liner system to top of the daily, intermediate, or final cover: 1 The 24 -inch -thick compacted cohesive soil liner (all scenarios) was modeled as a barrier soil liner, with user -defined soil properties referenced from recent NWLF CQA data from Unit 1 cell construction projects and a hydraulic conductivity of 1 x 10-7 cm/sec • The granular leachate collection drainage layer (all scenarios) was modeled as a lateral drainage layer, HELP Default Soil Type 1 (SP in USCS, CoS in USDA), with a hydraulic conductivity of 1 x 10-2 cm/sec i:115\15388801040014102 edop dft nov16 appendix c_engineering calculationskc-1 - help\1538880 app c-1 Ihb l 8nov1 e.docx Golder Associates HELP MODEL ANALYSIS Page 3 of 3 Project No.: 1538880 Made by: ALB Site Name: North Weld Landfill, Unit 2 EDOP Checked by: DVS Date: November 18, 2016 Reviewed by: JAR • The waste mass (all scenarios, varying thickness) was modeled as a vertical percolation layer, HELP default soil type 18 (municipal solid waste), with a hydraulic conductivity of 1 x 10-3 cm/sec • Daily and intermediate cover (all scenarios) were modeled as a vertical percolation layer with user -defined soil properties from site -specific laboratory test data (Swift River 2016a) and a default hydraulic conductivity of 1.9 x 10-4 cm/sec for HELP Default Soil Type 10 (SC in USCS, SCL in USDA) In The 30 -inch -thick water balance final cover (Scenario 4) was modeled as a vertical percolation layer with user -defined soil properties from site -specific laboratory test data (Swift River 2016a) and a default hydraulic conductivity of 1.9 x 10-4 cm/sec for HELP Default Soil Type 10 (SC in USCS, SCL in USDA) 4.0 CONCLUSIONS/RESULTS The results of the initial HELP Model analysis are summarized in Table 1 below: Table 1: Initial Leachate Generation Analysis HELP Model Results Scenario Waste and Cover Configuration Model Duration (yrs) Peak Head Liner (inches) Daily on Average Annual Impingement (in/yr) Liner 1 6 feet of waste with daily I cover 1 4.28 1 0.9720 2 70 feet of waste with daily cover 1 4.28 0.9739 3 - - 70 , - feet of - waste with intermediate cover 10 8.10 0.4306 4 1 154 feet of waste with final cover 30 8.06 0.0826 The HELP Model output reports from the initial analysis are provided in Attachment 1. The results of the initial analysis indicate that the peak daily head on liner is estimated to be greatest during intermediate and final cover conditions. This is to be expected as these operational scenarios are anticipated to have the longest durations. For each operational scenario and duration modelled, the calculated peak daily head on the alternative liner system is expected to be less than 12 inches throughout all open/daily cover, intermediate cover, and closed conditions of Unit 2. The results of the initial analysis also indicated that the operational conditions modeled under both Scenarios 1 and 2 result in very similar critical leachate generation and impingement (i.e., leakage) rates through the alternative liner system. Since the HELP model is limited to a quasi -two-dimensional input model of a single geometrically -defined waste mass, the operational input parameters for Scenario 2 (i.e., the waste height, slope length) were further varied to evaluate the sensitivity of the impingement rate to changes in these parameters. The results of the sensitivity analysis are summarized in Table 2 below: i:\15k1538880\040010402 edop dlt nov16\appendix c_engineering caiculaiions'\c-1 - help\1538880 app c-1 Ihb 18nov16.docx Golder Associates HELP MODEL ANALYSIS Page 4of4 Project No.: 1538880 Made by: ALB Site Name: r North Weld Landfill, Unit 2 EDOP Checked by: ; DVS O Date: November 18, 2016 Reviewed by: JAR l Table 2: HELP Model Sensitivity Analysis Results Scenario Waste Thickness (ft) Slope Length (ft) Model Duration (yrs) Average Annual Impingement (in/yr) Liner 2 70 845 1 0.9739 2A 80 845 1 0.9731 2B 90 845 1 0.9731 2C 60 845 1 0.9739 2D 70 800 1 0.9807 2E 70 i 700 1 0.9286 2F 70 500 1 0.8518 The HELP Model output report from the sensitivity analysis is provided in Attachment 2. The results of the sensitivity analysis indicated that the base operational conditions modeled as Operational Scenario 2 (i.e., slope length of 845 feet and floor slope of 2.64%) result in the most critical leachate impingement rate of 0.9739 inches per year. This rate was used as the source infiltration rate input parameter to the MULTIMED model for the alternative liner performance demonstration. 5.0 ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1: Operational Scenario HELP Model Results Attachment 2: Sensitivity Analysis HELP Model Results 6.0 REFERENCES Swift River Environmental Services, LLD (Swift River). 2O16. Report of Geotechnical Investigation, North Weld Landfill Unit 2, Permitting and Development. June. United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 1997. Hydrologic Evaluation of Landfill Performance (HELP) Model, Version 3.07. Waterways Experiment Station for USEPA Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory. November 1. i:\15\1538880\0400\0402 edop dft novl6\appendix c_engineering cafculations\c-1 - help\1538880 app c-1 Ihb 18nov16_docx Golder Associates ATTACHMENT 61 OPERATIONAL SCENARIO HELP MODEL OUTPUT * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *********** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ************************************************************* HYDROLOGIC EVALUATION OF LANDFILL PERFORMANCE HELP MODEL VERSION 3.07 (1 NOVEMBER 1997) DEVELOPED BY ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY USAE WATERWAYS EXPERIMENT STATION FOR USEPA RISK REDUCTION ENGINEERING LABORATORY * ************************************************************************ * **** * ************************************************************************ * **** PRECIPITATION DATA FILE: TEMPERATURE DATA FILE: SOLAR RADIATION DATA FILE: EVAPOTRANSPIRATION DATA: SOIL AND DESIGN DATA FILE: OUTPUT DATA FILE: TIME: 11:42 C:\NWPREC1.D4 C:\NWTEMP1.D7 C:\NWRAD1.D13 C:\NWEVAP.D11 C:\NW_SD_1.D10 C:\NW OUT 1.OUT DATE: 11/16/2016 * ************************************************************************ * **** TITLE: NORTH WELD LANDFILL SCENARIO 1:6' WASTE WITH DAILY COVER THICKNESS POROSITY FIELD CAPACITY WILTING POINT INITIAL SOIL WATER CONTENT EFFECTIVE SAT. HYD. COND. THICKNESS POROSITY FIELD CAPACITY WILTING POINT INITIAL SOIL WATER CONTENT EFFECTIVE SAT. HYD. COND. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * ***** NOTE: INITIAL MOISTURE CONTENT OF THE LAYERS AND SNOW WATER WERE COMPUTED AS NEARLY STEADY-STATE VALUES BY THE PROGRAM. LAYER 1 TYPE 1 - VERTICAL PERCOLATION LAYER MATERIAL TEXTURE NUMBER 0 6.00 INCHES 0.3930 VOL/VOL 0.2990 VOL/VOL 0.1330 VOL/VOL 0.1839 VOL/VOL 0.119999997000E-03 CM/SEC LAYER 2 TYPE 1 - VERTICAL PERCOLATION LAYER MATERIAL TEXTURE NUMBER 18 72.00 INCHES 0.6710 VOL/VOL 0.2920 VOL/VOL 0.0770 VOL/VOL 0.2920 VOL/VOL 0.100000005000E-02 CM/SEC LAYER 3 TYPE 2 - LATERAL DRAINAGE LAYER MATERIAL TEXTURE THICKNESS POROSITY FIELD CAPACITY WILTING POINT INITIAL SOIL WATER CONTENT EFFECTIVE SAT. HYD. COND. SLOPE DRAINAGE LENGTH NUMBER 1 6.00 INCHES 0.4170 VOL/VOL 0.0450 VOL/VOL 0.0180 VOL/VOL 0.0713 VOL/VOL 0.999999978000E-02 2.64 PERCENT 845.0 FEET CM/SEC LAYER 4 TYPE 3 - MATERIAL THICKNESS POROSITY FIELD CAPACITY WILTING POINT INITIAL SOIL WATER CONTENT EFFECTIVE SAT. HYD. COND. BARRIER SOIL LINER TEXTURE NUMBER 0 24.00 INCHES 0.4450 VOL/VOL 0.3930 VOL/VOL 0.1630 VOL/VOL 0.4450 VOL/VOL 0.100000001000E-06 CM/SEC GENERAL DESIGN AND EVAPORATIVE ZONE DATA NOTE: SCS RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER WAS USER -SPECIFIED. SCS RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER FRACTION OF AREA ALLOWING RUNOFF AREA PROJECTED ON HORIZONTAL PLANE EVAPORATIVE ZONE DEPTH INITIAL WATER IN EVAPORATIVE ZONE UPPER LIMIT OF EVAPORATIVE STORAGE LOWER LIMIT OF EVAPORATIVE STORAGE INITIAL SNOW WATER INITIAL WATER IN LAYER MATERIALS TOTAL INITIAL WATER TOTAL SUBSURFACE INFLOW 85.00 100.0 1.000 6.0 1.103 2.358 0.798 0.000 33.235 33.235 0.00 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION AND WEATHER DATA NOTE: EVAPOTRANSPIRATION DATA WAS OBTAINED FROM CHEYENNE WYOMING STATION LATITUDE MAXIMUM LEAF AREA INDEX START OF GROWING SEASON (JULIAN DATE) END OF GROWING SEASON (JULIAN DATE) EVAPORATIVE ZONE DEPTH AVERAGE ANNUAL WIND SPEED AVERAGE 1ST QUARTER RELATIVE HUMIDITY AVERAGE 2ND QUARTER RELATIVE HUMIDITY alb PERCENT ACRES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES/YEAR 40.59 DEGREES 0.00 138 273 6.0 INCHES 7.50 MPH 52.00 0 54.00 0 AVERAGE 3RD QUARTER RELATIVE HUMIDITY AVERAGE 4TH QUARTER RELATIVE HUMIDITY 50.00 o 51.00 N OTE: PRECIPITATION DATA WAS SYNTHETICALLY GENERATED USING COEFFICIENTS FOR CHEYENNE WYOMING JAN/JUL 0.41 1.87 NORMAL MEAN MONTHLY PRECIPITATION (INCHES) FEB/AUG 0.40 1.39 MAR/SEP 0.97 1.06 APR/OCT 1.24 0.68 MAY/NOV 2.39 0.53 JUN/ DEC N OTE: TEMPERATURE DATA WAS SYNTHETICALLY GENERATED USING COEFFICIENTS FOR CHEYENNE WYOMING JAN/JUL 26.10 68.90 NORMAL MEAN MONTHLY TEMPERATURE (DEGREES FAHRENHEIT) FEB/AUG 29.30 66.80 MAR/SEP 32.10 57.90 APR/OCT 41.80 47.50 MAY/N fV 52.20 34.80 2.00 0.37 JUN/DEC 62.00 29.30 N OTE: SOLAR RADIATION DATA WAS SYNTHETICALLY GENERATED USING COEFFICIENTS FOR CHEYENNE WYOMING AND STATION LATITUDE = 40.59 DEGREES * ************************************************************************ * ***** JUN/DEC PRECIPITATION 0.93 MONTHLY TOTALS (IN INCHES) FOR YEAR 1 JAN/JUL FEB/AUG MAR/SEP APR/OCT MAY/NOV 0.08 0.07 1.13 0.47 1.97 2.49 0.96 1.72 0.96 0.39 0.11 RUNOFF }} 0.000 0.000 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 0.513 0.201 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED 0.0933 FROM LAYER 3 0.0397 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH 0.1095 LAYER 4 0.1086 0.000 0.000 0.117 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.147 0.242 0.756 0.499 1.378 2.292 0.802 2.007 0.299 0.494 0.0142 0.0012 0.0000 0.0000 0.0113 0.1077 0.0877 0.0776 0.0595 0.0499 0.1066 0.0465 0.0015 0.0013 0.0469 0.1141 0.1125 0.1083 0.11:2 0.1060 MONTHLY SUMMARIES FOR DAILY HEADS (INCHES) AVERAGE DAILY HEAD ON 1.756 TOP OF LAYER 4 0.724 STD. DEVIATION OF DAILY 0.331 HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 0.117 0.259 1.962 0.095 0.210 0.023 1.599 0.034 0.156 0.000 1.461 0.000 0.113 0.000 1.085 0.000 0.134 0.207 0.940 0.291 0.051 * ****************-***********-***********-************* ****-****************-* * ***** * *******************-********-********-***-*****************-****-************* * ***** ANNUAL TOTALS FOR YEAR 1 INCHES CU. FEET PERCENT PRECIPITATION 11.28 100.00 RUNOFF 1.03 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 85.37 DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 4.81 PERC./LEAKAGE T 8.62 ROUGH LAYER 4 AVG. HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 CHANGE IN WATER STORAGE 0.17 SOIL WATER AT START OF YEAR SOIL WATER AT END OF YEAR SNOW WATER AT START OF YEAR 0.00 SNOW WATER AT END OF YEAR 0.00 ANNUAL WATER BUDGET BALANCE 0.00 0.117 9.630 0.5421 0.971989 0.8347 40946.406 423.764 34 956.2 62 1967.939 3528.322 0.019 70.123 33.235 33.254 0.000 120643.547 120713, 672 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0000 -0.005 * -******-*********************-********************************************* * ***** * ************************************************************************ * ***** AVERAGE MONTHLY VALUES IN INCHES FOR YEARS 1 THROUGH 1 JAN/JUL FEB/AUG MAR/SEP APR/OCT MAY/NOV JUN/DEC PRECIPITATION TOTALS 0.93 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.08 2.49 STD, DEVIATIONS 0.00 RUNOFF TOTALS 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.000 0.07 1.13 0.96 1.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.117 0.47 1.97 0.96 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 STD. DEVIATIONS 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION TOTALS 0.513 0.201 0.000 0.147 2.292 0.000 0.000 0.242 0.756 0.802 2.007 0.000 0.000 0.499 1.378 0.299 0.494 STD. DEVIATIONS 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 TOTALS 0.0933 0.0397 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0142 0.0012 0.0000 0.0000 0.0113 0.1077 0.0877 0.0776 0.0595 0.0499 STD. DEVIATIONS 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 TOTALS 0.1095 0.1086 STD. DEVIATIONS 0.0000 0.0000 0.1066 0.1141 0.0000 0.0000 0.0465 0.0015 0.0013 0.0469 0.1125 0.1083 0.1102 0.1060 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 AVERAGES OF MONTHLY AVERAGED DAILY HEADS (INCHES) DAILY AVERAGE HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 AVERAGES 1.7564 0.7240 STD. DEVIATIONS 0.0000 0.0000 0.2592 1.9624 0.0000 0.0000 0.0232 0.0000 0.0000 0.2068 1.5986 1.4610 1.0849 0.9403 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * ************************************************************************ * ***** 1 AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTALS & (STD. DEVIATIONS) FOR YEARS 1 THROUGH PERCENT PRECIPITATION 100.00 RUNOFF 1.035 INCHES 11.28 0.117 ( 0.000) ( 0.0000) CU. FEET 40946.4 423.76 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 85.371 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED 4.80613 FROM. LAYER 3 9.630 ( 0.0000) 34956.26 0.54213 ( 0.00000) 1967.939 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH 0.97199 ( 0.00000) 3528.322 8.61693 LAYER 4 AVERAGE HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 CHANGE IN WATER STORAGE 0.171 0.835 ( 0.000) 0.019 ( 0.0000) 70.12 ************************************************************************* ****** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * PEAK DAILY VALUES FOR YEARS 1 THROUGH 1 (INCHES) (CU. FT.) PRECIPITATION RUNOFF DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 4.53152 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 13.51113 AVERAGE HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 0.64 0.117 0.00400 0.003722 2.262 MAXIMUM HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 4.283 LOCATION OF MAXIMUM HEAD IN LAYER 3 (DISTANCE FROM DRAIN) 44.4 FEET SNOW WATER 2323.200 423.7645 0.41 1476.5393 MAXIMUM VEG. SOIL WATER (VOL/VOL) 0.2614 MINIMUM VEG. SOIL WATER (VOL/VOL) 0.1330 *** Maximum heads are computed using McEnroe's equations. Reference: Maximum Saturated Depth over Landfill Liner by Bruce M. McEnroe, University of Kansas ASCE Journal of Environmental Engineering Vol. 119, No. 2, March 1993, pp. 262-270. *** * *****-********-********-****-********************-********-****-*************** * **** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * **** FINAL WATER STORAGE AT END OF YEAR 1 LAYER 1 2 3 4 SNOW WATER (INCHES) (VOL/VOL) 1.0839 21.0239 0.4666 10.6800 0.000 0.1806 0.2920 0.0778 0.4450 * ************************************************************************ * **** * *********-***************-*****************-***-************-**************** * **** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * **** * *** ********************************************************************* HYDROLOGIC EVALUATION OF LANDFILL PERFORMANCE HELP MODEL VERSION 3.07 (1 NOVEMBER 1997) DEVELOPED BY ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY USAF WATERWAYS EXPERIMENT STATION FOR USEPA RISK REDUCTION ENGINEERING LABORATORY * ************************************************************************ * **** * ************************************************************************ * **** PRECIPITATION DATA FILE: TEMPERATURE DATA FILE: SOLAR RADIATION DATA FILE: EVAPOTRANSPIRATION DATA: SOIL AND DESIGN DATA FILE: OUTPUT DATA FILE: TIME: 11:43 C:\NWPREC1.D4 C:\NWTEMPl.D7 C:\NWRAD1.D13 C:\NWEVAP.D11 C:\NW SD 2.D10 C:\NW OUT 2.OUT DATE: 11/16/2016 * ************************************************************************ * **** TITLE: NORTH WELD LANDFILL SCENARIO 2: 70'WASTE 'WASTE WITH DAILY COVER THICKNESS POROSITY FIELD CAPACITY WILTING POINT INITIAL SOIL WATER CONTENT EFFECTIVE SAT. HYD. COND. THICKNESS POROSITY FIELD CAPACITY WILTING POINT INITIAL SOIL WATER CONTENT EFFECTIVE SAT. HYD. COND. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * ***** NOTE: INITIAL MOISTURE CONTENT OF THE LAYERS AND SNOW WATER WERE COMPUTED AS NEARLY STEADY-STATE VALUES BY THE PROGRAM. LAYER 1 TYPE 1 - VERTICAL PERCOLATION LAYER MATERIAL TEXTURE NUMBER 0 6.00 INCHES 0.3930 VOL/VOL 0.2990 VOL/VOL 0.1330 VOL/VOL 0.1839 VOL/VOL 0.119999997000E-03 CM/SEC LAYER 2 TYPE 1 - VERTICAL PERCOLATION LAYER MATERIAL TEXTURE NUMBER 18 840.00 INCHES 0.6710 VOL/VOL 0.2920 VOL/VOL 0.0770 VOL/VOL 0.2920 VOL/VOL 0.100000005000E-02 CM/SEC LAYER 3 TYPE 2 - LATERAL DRAINAGE LAYER MATERIAL TEXTURE THICKNESS POROSITY FIELD CAPACITY WILTING POINT INITIAL SOIL WATER CONTENT EFFECTIVE SAT. HYD. COND. SLOPE DRAINAGE LENGTH NUMBER 1 6.00 INCHES 0.4170 VOL/VOL 0.0450 VOL/VOL 0.0180 VOL/VOL 0.0717 VOL/VOL 0.999999978000E-02 2.64 PERCENT 845.0 FEET CM/SEC LAYER 4 TYPE 3 - MATERIAL THICKNESS POROSITY FIELD CAPACITY WILTING POINT INITIAL SOIL WATER CONTENT EFFECTIVE SAT. HYD. COND. BARRIER SOIL LINER TEXTURE NUMBER 0 24.00 INCHES 0.4450 VOL/VOL 0.3930 VOL/VOL 0.2770 VOL/VOL 0.4450 VOL/VOL 0.100000001000E-06 CM/SEC GENERAL DESIGN AND EVAPORATIVE ZONE DATA NOTE: SCS RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER WAS USER -SPECIFIED. SCS RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER FRACTION OF AREA ALLOWING RUNOFF AREA PROJECTED ON HORIZONTAL PLANE EVAPORATIVE ZONE DEPTH INITIAL WATER IN EVAPORATIVE ZONE UPPER LIMIT OF EVAPORATIVE STORAGE LOWER LIMIT OF EVAPORATIVE STORAGE INITIAL SNOW WATER INITIAL WATER IN LAYER MATERIALS TOTAL INITIAL WATER TOTAL SUBSURFACE INFLOW 85.00 100.0 1.000 6.0 1.103 2.358 0.798 0.000 257.494 257.494 0.00 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION AND WEATHER DATA NOTE: EVAPOTRANSPIRATION DATA WAS OBTAINED FROM CHEYENNE WYOMING STATION LATITUDE MAXIMUM LEAF AREA INDEX START OF GROWING SEASON (JULIAN DATE) END OF GROWING SEASON (JULIAN DATE) EVAPORATIVE ZONE DEPTH AVERAGE ANNUAL WIND SPEED AVERAGE 1ST QUARTER RELATIVE HUMIDITY AVERAGE 2ND QUARTER RELATIVE HUMIDITY alb PERCENT ACRES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES/YEAR 40.59 DEGREES 0.00 138 273 6.0 INCHES 7.50 MPH 52.00 0 54.00 0 AVERAGE 3RD QUARTER RELATIVE HUMIDITY AVERAGE 4TH QUARTER RELATIVE HUMIDITY 50.00 o 51.00 N OTE: PRECIPITATION DATA WAS SYNTHETICALLY GENERATED USING COEFFICIENTS FOR CHEYENNE WYOMING JAN/JUL 0.41 1.87 NORMAL MEAN MONTHLY PRECIPITATION (INCHES) FEB/AUG 0.40 1.39 MAR/SEP 0.97 1.06 APR/OCT 1.24 0.68 MAY/NOV 2.39 0.53 JUN/ DEC N OTE: TEMPERATURE DATA WAS SYNTHETICALLY GENERATED USING COEFFICIENTS FOR CHEYENNE WYOMING JAN/JUL 26.10 68.90 NORMAL MEAN MONTHLY TEMPERATURE (DEGREES FAHRENHEIT) FEB/AUG 29.30 66.80 MAR/SEP 32.10 57.90 APR/OCT 41.80 47.50 MAY/N fV 52.20 34.80 2.00 0.37 JUN/DEC 62.00 29.30 N OTE: SOLAR RADIATION DATA WAS SYNTHETICALLY GENERATED USING COEFFICIENTS FOR CHEYENNE WYOMING AND STATION LATITUDE = 40.59 DEGREES * ************************************************************************ * ***** JUN/DEC PRECIPITATION 0.93 MONTHLY TOTALS (IN INCHES) FOR YEAR 1 JAN/JUL FEB/AUG MAR/SEP APR/OCT MAY/NOV 0.08 0.07 1.13 0.47 1.97 2.49 0.96 1.72 0.96 0.39 0.11 RUNOFF }} 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.117 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.000 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 0.147 0.242 0.756 0.499 1.378 0.513 0.201 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED 0.0919 FROM LAYER 3 0.0399 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH 0.1094 LAYER 4 0.1086 2.292 0.802 2.007 0.299 0.494 0.0146 0.0013 0.0000 0.0000 0.0111 0.1078 0.0879 0.0777 0.0597 0.0501 0.1066 0.0485 0.0015 0.0013 0.0468 0.1141 0.1125 0.1083 0.11:2 0.1061 MONTHLY SUMMARIES FOR DAILY HEADS (INCHES) AVERAGE DAILY HEAD ON 1.730 TOP OF LAYER 4 0.726 STD. DEVIATION OF DAILY 0.349 HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 0.117 0.265 1.965 0.095 0.209 0.026 1.603 0.036 0.156 0.000 1.463 0.000 0.113 0.000 1.088 0.000 0.134 0.202 0.943 0.288 0.051 * ****************-***********-***********-************* ****-****************-* * ***** * *******************-********-********-***-*****************-****-************* * ***** ANNUAL TOTALS FOR YEAR 1 PERCENT PRECIPITATION 100.00 RUNOFF 1.03 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 85.37 DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 4.80 PERC./LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 8.63 AVG. HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 CHANGE IN WATER STORAGE 0.16 SOIL WATER AT START OF YEAR SOIL WATER AT END OF YEAR SNOW WATER AT START OF YEAR 0.00 SNOW WATER AT END OF YEAR 0.00 ANNUAL WATER BUDGET BALANCE 0.00 INCHES 11.28 0.117 9.630 0.5419 0.973931 0.8343 0.018 257.494 257.511 0.000 0.000 0.0000 CU. FEET 40946.406 423.764 34956.262 1966.929 3535.370 64.030 934701.875 934765.875 0.000 0.000 0.049 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * ************************************************************************ * ***** AVERAGE MONTHLY VALUES IN INCHES FOR YEARS 1 THROUGH 1 JAN/JUL FEB/AUG MAR/SEP APR/OCT MAY/NOV JUN/DEC PRECIPITATION TOTALS 0.93 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.08 2.49 STD, DEVIATIONS 0.00 RUNOFF TOTALS 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.000 0.07 1.13 0.96 1.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.117 0.47 1.97 0.96 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 STD. DEVIATIONS 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION TOTALS 0.513 0.201 0.000 0.147 2.292 0.000 0.000 0.242 0.756 0.802 2.007 0.000 0.000 0.499 1.378 0.299 0.494 STD. DEVIATIONS 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 TOTALS 0.0919 0.0399 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0146 0.0013 0.0000 0.0000 0.0111 0.1078 0.0879 0.0777 0.0597 0.0501 STD. DEVIATIONS 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 TOTALS 0.1094 0.1086 STD. DEVIATIONS 0.0000 0.0000 0.1066 0.0485 0.0015 0.0013 0.0468 0.1141 0.1125 0.1083 0.1102 0.1061 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 AVERAGES OF MONTHLY AVERAGED DAILY HEADS (INCHES) DAILY AVERAGE HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 AVERAGES 1.7300 0.7263 STD. DEVIATIONS 0.0000 0.0000 0.2653 0.0258 0.0000 0.0000 0.2020 1.9647 1.6028 1.4633 1.0881 0.9431 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * ************************************************************************ * ***** 1 AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTALS & (STD. DEVIATIONS) FOR YEARS 1 THROUGH PERCENT PRECIPITATION 100.00 RUNOFF 1.035 INCHES 11.28 0.000) 0.117 ( 0.0000) CU. FEET 40946.4 423.76 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 85.371 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED 4.80367 FROM. LAYER 3 9.630 ( 0.0000) 34956.26 0.54185 ( 0.00000) 1966.929 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH 0.97393 ( 0.00000) 3535.370 8.63414 LAYER 4 AVERAGE HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 CHANGE IN WATER STORAGE 0.156 0.834 ( 0.000) 0.018 ( 0.0000) 64.03 ************************************************************************* ****** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * PEAK DAILY VALUES FOR YEARS 1 THROUGH 1 (INCHES) (CU. FT.) PRECIPITATION RUNOFF DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 14.52650 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 13.51072 AVERAGE HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 0.64 0.117 0.00400 0.003722 2.261 MAXIMUM HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 4.281 LOCATION OF MAXIMUM HEAD IN LAYER 3 (DISTANCE FROM DRAIN) 44.4 FEET SNOW WATER 2323.200 423.7645 0.41 1476.5393 MAXIMUM VEG. SOIL WATER (VOL/VOL) 0.2614 MINIMUM VEG. SOIL WATER (VOL/VOL) 0.1330 *** Maximum heads are computed using McEnroe's equations. Reference: Maximum Saturated Depth over Landfill Liner by Bruce M. McEnroe, University of Kansas ASCE Journal of Environmental Engineering Vol. 119, No. 2, March 1993, pp. 262-270. *** * *****-********-********-****-********************-********-****-*************** * **** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * **** FINAL WATER STORAGE AT END OF YEAR 1 LAYER 1 2 3 4 SNOW WATER (INCHES) (VOL/VOL) 1.0839 245.2799 0.4674 10.6800 0.000 0.1806 0.2920 0.0779 0.4450 * ************************************************************************ * **** * *********-***************-*****************-***-************-**************** * **** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * **** * *** ********************************************************************* HYDROLOGIC EVALUATION OF LANDFILL PERFORMANCE HELP MODEL VERSION 3.07 (1 NOVEMBER 1997) DEVELOPED BY ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY USAF WATERWAYS EXPERIMENT STATION FOR USEPA RISK REDUCTION ENGINEERING LABORATORY * ************************************************************************ * **** * ************************************************************************ * **** PRECIPITATION DATA FILE: TEMPERATURE DATA FILE: SOLAR RADIATION DATA FILE: EVAPOTRANSPIRATION DATA: SOIL AND DESIGN DATA FILE: OUTPUT DATA FILE: TIME: 11:44 C:\NWPREC1.D4 C:\NWTEMPl.D7 C:\NWRAD1.D13 C:\NWEVAP12.D11 C:\NWSD3D10 C:\NW OUT 3.OUT DATE: 11/16/2016 * ************************************************************************ * **** TITLE: NORTH WELD LANDFILL SCENARIO 3: 70'WASTE 'WASTE WITH INT COVER THICKNESS POROSITY FIELD CAPACITY WILTING POINT INITIAL SOIL WATER CONTENT EFFECTIVE SAT. HYD. COND. THICKNESS POROSITY FIELD CAPACITY WILTING POINT INITIAL SOIL WATER CONTENT EFFECTIVE SAT. HYD. COND. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * ***** NOTE: INITIAL MOISTURE CONTENT OF THE LAYERS AND SNOW WATER WERE COMPUTED AS NEARLY STEADY-STATE VALUES BY THE PROGRAM. LAYER 1 TYPE 1 - VERTICAL PERCOLATION LAYER MATERIAL TEXTURE NUMBER 0 12.00 INCHES 0.3930 VOL/VOL 0.2990 VOL/VOL 0.1330 VOL/VOL 0.1774 VOL/VOL 0.119999997000E-03 CM/SEC LAYER 2 TYPE 1 - VERTICAL PERCOLATION LAYER MATERIAL TEXTURE NUMBER 18 840.00 INCHES 0.6710 VOL/VOL 0.2920 VOL/VOL 0.0770 VOL/VOL 0.2920 VOL/VOL 0.100000005000E-02 CM/SEC LAYER 3 TYPE 2 - LATERAL DRAINAGE LAYER MATERIAL TEXTURE THICKNESS POROSITY FIELD CAPACITY WILTING POINT INITIAL SOIL WATER CONTENT EFFECTIVE SAT. HYD. COND. SLOPE DRAINAGE LENGTH NUMBER 1 6.00 INCHES 0.4170 VOL/VOL 0.0450 VOL/VOL 0.0180 VOL/VOL 0.0450 VOL/VOL 0.999999978000E-02 CM/SEC 2.64 PERCENT 845.0 FEET LAYER 4 TYPE 3 - MATERIAL THICKNESS POROSITY FIELD CAPACITY WILTING POINT INITIAL SOIL WATER CONTENT EFFECTIVE SAT. HYD. COND. BARRIER SOIL LINER TEXTURE NUMBER 0 24.00 INCHES 0.4450 VOL/VOL 0.3930 VOL/VOL 0.2770 VOL/VOL 0.4450 VOL/VOL 0.100000001000E-06 CM/SEC GENERAL DESIGN AND EVAPORATIVE ZONE DATA NOTE: SCS RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER WAS USER -SPECIFIED. SCS RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER FRACTION OF AREA ALLOWING RUNOFF AREA PROJECTED ON HORIZONTAL PLANE EVAPORATIVE ZONE DEPTH INITIAL WATER IN EVAPORATIVE ZONE UPPER LIMIT OF EVAPORATIVE STORAGE LOWER LIMIT OF EVAPORATIVE STORAGE INITIAL SNOW WATER INITIAL WATER IN LAYER MATERIALS TOTAL INITIAL WATER TOTAL SUBSURFACE INFLOW 85.00 100.0 1.000 12.0 2.129 4.716 1.596 0.000 258.359 258.359 0.00 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION AND WEATHER DATA NOTE: EVAPOTRANSPIRATION DATA WAS OBTAINED FROM CHEYENNE WYOMING STATION LATITUDE MAXIMUM LEAF AREA INDEX START OF GROWING SEASON (JULIAN DATE) END OF GROWING SEASON (JULIAN DATE) EVAPORATIVE ZONE DEPTH AVERAGE ANNUAL WIND SPEED AVERAGE 1ST QUARTER RELATIVE HUMIDITY AVERAGE 2ND QUARTER RELATIVE HUMIDITY alb PERCENT ACRES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES/YEAR 40.59 DEGREES 0.00 138 273 12.0 INCHES 7.50 MPH 52.00 % 54.00 o AVERAGE 3RD QUARTER RELATIVE HUMIDITY AVERAGE 4TH QUARTER RELATIVE HUMIDITY 50.00 o 51.00 N OTE: PRECIPITATION DATA WAS SYNTHETICALLY GENERATED USING COEFFICIENTS FOR CHEYENNE WYOMING JAN/JUL 0.41 1.87 NORMAL MEAN MONTHLY PRECIPITATION (INCHES) FEB/AUG 0.40 1.39 MAR/SEP 0.97 1.06 APR/OCT 1.24 0.68 MAY/NOV 2.39 0.53 JUN/ DEC N OTE: TEMPERATURE DATA WAS SYNTHETICALLY GENERATED USING COEFFICIENTS FOR CHEYENNE WYOMING JAN/JUL 26.10 68.90 NORMAL MEAN MONTHLY TEMPERATURE (DEGREES FAHRENHEIT) FEB/AUG 29.30 66.80 MAR/SEP 32.10 57.90 APR/OCT 41.80 47.50 MAY/N fV 52.20 34.80 2.00 0.37 JUN/DEC 62.00 29.30 N OTE: SOLAR RADIATION DATA WAS SYNTHETICALLY GENERATED USING COEFFICIENTS FOR CHEYENNE WYOMING AND STATION LATITUDE = 40.59 DEGREES * ************************************************************************ * ***** JUN/DEC PRECIPITATION 0.93 MONTHLY TOTALS (IN INCHES) FOR YEAR 1 JAN/JUL FEB/AUG MAR/SEP APR/OCT MAY/NOV 0.08 0.07 1.13 0.47 1.97 2.49 0.96 1.72 0.96 0.39 0.11 RUNOFF }} 0.000 0.000 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 0.927 0.189 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED 0.0232 FROM LAYER 3 0.0000 0.000 0.000 0.117 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.146 0.241 0.757 0.500 1.714 2.635 0.666 1.633 0.533 1.400 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0007 0.0079 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH 0.0000 0.0003 0.0001 0.0001 0.0145 0.1039 LAYER 4 0.1041 0.0000 0.0002 0.0011 0.0017 0.0051 MONTHLY SUMMARIES FOR DAILY HEADS (INCHES) AVERAGE DAILY HEAD ON 0.437 TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 STD. DEVIATION OF DAILY 0.071 HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 0.002 0.000 0.144 0.000 0.089 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.012 0.000 0.043 0.000 * ****************-***********-***********-************* ****-****************-* * ***** * *******************-********-********-***-*****************-****-************* * ***** ANNUAL TOTALS FOR YEAR 1 INCHES CU. FEET PERCENT PRECIPITATION 11.28 100.00 RUNOFF 1.03 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 100.54 DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 0.28 PERC./LEAKAGE T 2.05 ROUGH LAYER 4 AVG. HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 CHANGE IN WATER STORAGE 3.90 SOIL WATER AT START F YEAR SOIL WATER AT END OF YEAR SNOW WATER AT START OF YEAR 0.00 SNOW WATER AT END OF YEAR 0.00 ANNUAL WATER BUDGET BALANCE 0.00 0.117 11.340 0.0318 0.231000 0.0495 40946.406 423.764 41165.992 115.507 838.529 -0.440 -1597.430 258.359 257 . 919 0.000 937843.187 936245.750 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.042 * -******-*********************-********************************************* * ***** * ************************************************************************ * ***** MONTHLY TOTALS (IN INCHES) FOR YEAR 2 JAN/ JUL FEB/AUG MAR/ SE P APR/OCT MAY/NOV JUN/ DEC PRECIPITATION 0.78 0.84 0.62 1.52 3.26 4.29 0.90 RUNOFF 0.013 0.000 1.89 0.54 1.27 0.12 0.30 0.005 0.014 0.057 0.000 0.022 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 0.574 0.739 0.330 1.353 2.961 3.897 0.603 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED 0.0349 FROM LAYER 3 0.0032 1.457 1.093 0.730 0.360 0.441 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0253 0.1122 0.0891 0.0601 0.0390 0.0185 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0817 0.1048 LAYER 4 0.1144 0.1126 0.1069 0.1086 0.1035 0.0666 MONTHLY SUMMARIES FOR DAILY HEADS (INCHES) AVERAGE DAILY HEAD ON 0.657 TOP OF LAYER 4 0.059 STD. DEVIATION OF DAILY 0.085 HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 0.063 0.000 2.044 0.000 0.322 0.000 1.625 0..000 0.159 0.000 1.132 0.000 0.131 0.000 0.710 0.000 0.116 0.462 0.349 0.409 0.096 ************************************************************************* ****** -* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ***** * * * * ANNUAL TOTALS FOR YEAR 2 INCHES CU. FEET PERCENT PRECIPITATION 100.00 RUNOFF 0.68 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 89.02 DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 2.34 PERC./LEAKAGE /LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 4.89. AVG. HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 CHANGE IN WATER STORAGE 3.06 SOIL WATER AT START OF YEAR SOIL WATER AT END OF YEAR SNOW WATER AT START OF YEAR 0.00 SNOW WATER AT END OF YEAR 0.00 ANNUAL WATER BUDGET BALANCE 0.00 16.33 0.111 14.538 0.3823 0.799071 0.5864 59277.898 402.739 52771.543 1387.847 2900.628 0.500 1815.111 257.919 258.419 0.000 936245.750 938060.875 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.033 * ************************************************************************ * ***** -* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ****** * * * * MONTHLY TOTALS (IN INCHES) FO►R YEAR 3 JAN/JUL FEB/AUG MAR/SEP APR/OCT MAY/NOV JUN/DEC PRECIPITATION 0.22 0.22 1.29 2.48 1.42 1.28 0.47 RUNOFF 0.000 0.005 0.86 0.51 1.78 1.43 0.28 0.000 0.000 0.236 0.285 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 0.220 0.135 0.460 2.704 1.428 1.774 0.373 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED 0.0038 FROM LAYER 3 0.0000 0.393 0.409 1.544 1.057 0.927 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0095 0.0198 0.0000 0.0000 0.0003 0.0001 0.0000 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0501 0.1070 0.0722 LAYER 4 0.0000 0.0001 0.0243 0.0224 0.0137 0.0000 MONTHLY SUMMARIES FOR DAILY HEADS (INCHES) AVERAGE DAILY HEAD ON 0.072 TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.179 0.361 0.000 0.000 0.006 0.001 0.000 STD. DEVIATION OF DAILY 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.233 0.094 0.069 HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.014 0.002 0.001 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * ************************************************************************ * ***** PERCENT ANNUAL TOTALS FOR YEAR 3 PRECIPITATION 100.00 RUNOFF 4.29 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 93.33 DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 0.27 PERC./LEAKAGE / LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 2.37 AVG. HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 CHANGE IN WATER STORAGE 0.26 SOIL WATER AT START OF YEAR SOIL WATER AT END OF YEAR SNOW WATER AT START OF YEAR 0.00 SNOW WATER AT END OF YEAR 0.00 ANNUAL WATER BUDGET BALANCE 0.00 INCHES 12.24 0.526 11.423 0.0335 0.289900 0.0516 -0.032 258.419 258.387 0.000 0.000 0.0000 CU. FEET 44431.207 1908.257 41466.527 121.783 1052.336 -117.647 938060.875 937943.250 0.000 0.000 -0.049 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * ***** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ***** * * * * MONTHLY TOTALS (IN INCHES) FOR YEAR 4 JAN/JUL FEB/AUG MAR/SEP APR/OCT MAY/NOV JUN/DEC PRECIPITATION 0.17 0.59 0.59 0.77 1.97 1.30 0.53 RUNOFF 0.000 0.001 1.46 1.41 0.99 0.74 1.20 0.000 0.000 0.004 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 0.188 0.564 0.508 0.296 1.949 1.876 0.654 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED 0.0395 FROM LAYER 3 0.0000 0.757 1.483 1.366 0.586 0.639 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0010 0.0238 0.0061 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH 0.0000 0.0010 0.0000 0.0000 0.0342 0.1052 LAYER 4 0.1073 0.0911 0.0004 0.0017 0.0001 0.0001 MONTHLY SUMMARIES FOR DAILY HEADS (INCHES) AVERAGE DAILY HEAD ON 0.743 TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 STD. DEVIATION OF DAILY 0.146 HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.019 0.433 .111 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.042 0.103 0.084 0.000 0.000 0.000 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * ************************************************************************ * ***** ANNUAL TOTALS FOR YEAR 4 PERCENT PRECIPITATION 100.00 RUNOFF 0.05 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 92.71 DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 0.60 PERC./LEAKAGE /LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 2.91 AVG. HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 CHANGE IN WATER STORAGE 3.73 SOIL WATER AT START OF YEAR SOIL WATER AT END OF YEAR SNOW WATER AT START OF YEAR 0.00 INCHES CU. FEET 11.72 0.006 10.865 0.0703 0.341309 0.1088 42543.613 20.514 39440.527 255.221 1238.951 0.438 1588.347 258.387 258.824 0.000 937 943.250 939531.562 0.000 SNOW WATER AT END OF YEAR 0.00 ANNUAL WATER BUDGET BALANCE 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.055 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * ************************-***-********-***-********************************** * ***** MONTHLY TOTALS (IN INCHES) FOR YEAR JUN/DEC JAN/JUL FEB/AUG MAR/SEP APR/OCT MAY/NOV PRECIPITATION 0.66 0.05 1.17 1.00 1.59 0.80 0.08 RUNOFF 0.000 0.000 1.51 2.03 2.55 1.00 0.68 0.136 0.000 0.000 0.030 0.000 0.004 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 0.330 0.494 0.790 1.606 1.992 0.406 0.488 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED 0.0000 FROM LAYER 3 0.0000 1.288 1.840 2.453 0.881 1.107 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0003 0.0001 0.0160 0.0075 0.0000 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH 0.0000 0.0000 0.0025 0.0047 0.0010 0.0000 LAYER 4 0.0179 0.0201 0.0996 0.1009 0.0018 0.0003 MONTHLY SUMMARIES FOR DAILY HEADS (INCHES) AVERAGE DAILY HEAD ON 0.000 TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 STD. DEVIATION OF DAILY 0.000 HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 0.000 0.006 0.000 0.015 0.000 0.002 0.O00 0.004 0.000 0.302 0.000 0.172 0.000 0.136 0.000 0.089 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * -***-*******-****-*****************************************************-***** * ***** PERCENT ANNUAL TOTALS FOR YEAR 5 INCHES CU. FEET PRECIPITATION 13.12 100.00 RUNOFF 1.30 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 104.23 DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 0.18 PERC,/LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 1.90 AVG. HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 CHANGE IN WATER STORAGE 7.61 0.171 13.675 0.0239 0.248775 0.0372 47625.602 619.090 49639.984 86.869 903.053 -0.998 -3623.353 SOIL WATER AT START OF YEAR SOIL WATER AT END OF YEAR SNOW WATER AT START OF YEAR 0.00 SNOW WATER AT END OF YEAR 0.00 ANNUAL WATER BUDGET BALANCE 0.00 258.824 257.826 0.000 0.000 0.0000 939531.562 935908.250 0.000 0.000 -0.039 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * ************************************************************************ * ***** MONTHLY TOTALS (IN INCHES) FOR YEAR 6 JUN/ DEC PRECIPITATION 2.22 0.41 RUNOFF 0.003 0.000 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 2.868 0.327 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED 0.2137 JAN/ JUL FEB/AUG MAR/ SE P APR/OCT MAY/NOV 0.13 0.58 1.94 0.79 1.30 2.02 0.90 6.33 0.05 0.04 0.000 0.009 0.115 0.000 0.379 0.O00 0.000 0.O08 0.000 0.000 0.130 0.186 0.671 0.631 4.629 1.136 0.908 2.002 0.415 0.040 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0531 FROM LAYER 3 0.1759 0.1357 0.1291 0.1174 0.0834 0.0595 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0017 0.0801 0.1192 LAYER 4 0.1195 0.1163 0.1124 0.1149 0.1087 0.1102 MONTHLY SUMMARIES FOR DAILY HEADS (INCHES) AVERAGE DAILY HEAD ON 4.024 TOP OF LAYER 4 1.085 STD. DEVIATION OF DAILY 0.240 HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 0.134 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.968 3.206 2.473 2.432 2.140 1.571 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.210 0.233 0.198 0.291 0.183 0.152 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * ************************************************************************ * ***** ANNUAL TOTALS FOR YEAR 6 PERCENT PRECIPITATION 100.00 RUNOFF 3.07 a 1 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION .44 DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 5.79 INCHES CU. FEET 16.71 0.513 13.943 0.9680 60657.316 1862.365 50611 60 9 3513.711 PERC./LEAKAGE / LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 5.28 0.882966 3205.167 AVG. HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 1.4917 CHANGE IN WATER STORAGE 2.41 SOIL WATER AT START OF YEAR SOIL WATER AT END OF YEAR SNOW WATER AT START OF YEAR 0.00 SNOW WATER AT END OF YEAR 0.41 ANNUAL WATER BUDGET BALANCE 0.00 0.403 1464.402 257.826 258.161 0.000 935908.250 937123.250 0.000 0.069 249.380 0.0000 0.064 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * ************************************************************************ * ***** JUN/DEC PRECIPITATION 3.28 0.39 RUNOFF 0.006 0.000 MONTHLY TOTALS (IN INCHES) FOR YEAR 7 JAN/ JUL FEB/AUG MAR/SEP APR/OCT MAY/NOV 0.57 0.86 0.45 1.55 1.75 0.29 2.18 0.68 1.23 0.28 0.020 0.018 0.000 0.320 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 0.287 0.190 1.329 1.781 1.486 3.230 0.737 1.568 0.808 0.227 0.487 0.383 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED 0.0020 , 0 FROM M LAYER 3 0.000 0.0364 0.0158 0.0040 0.0048 0.0098 0.0000 0.0014 0.0052 0.0000 0.0000 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH 0.1084 0.0965 0.1047 0.0575 0.1062 0.0878 LAYER 4 0.0047 0.0218 0.0879 0.0000 0.0001 0.0000 MONTHLY SUMMARIES FOR DAILY HEADS (INCHES) AVERAGE DAILY HEAD ON 0.038 TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 STD. DEVIATION OF DAILY 0.024 HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 0.663 0.319 0.073 0.091 0.178 0.000 0.026 0.097 0.000 0.000 0.114 0.089 0.046 0.127 0.060 0.002 0.067 0.070 0.000 0.000 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * ****************-*********************-*********************************** * ***** ANNUAL TOTALS FOR YEAR 7 PERCENT PRECIPITATION 100.00 INCHES CU. FEET 13.51 49041.297 RUNOFF 2.69 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 92.63 DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 0.59 PERC . /LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 5.00 AVG. HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 CHANGE IN WATER STORAGE 0.91 SOIL WATER AT START OF YEAR SOIL WATER AT END OF YEAR SNOW WATER AT START OF YEAR 0.51 SNOW WATER AT END OF YEAR 0.00 ANNUAL WATER BUDGET BALANCE 0.00 0.364 12.514 0.0793 0.675639 0.1237 1320.325 45425.711 288.018 2452.569 -0.123 -445.348 258.161 258.107 0.069 937123.250 936927.312 249.380 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.024 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * -****-******-****-*******************************************-******-****-***** * ***** JUN/DEC MONTHLY TOTALS (IN INCHES) FOR YEAR 8 JAN/ JUL FEB/AUG MAR/SEP APR/OCT MAY/NOV PRECIPITATION 1.30 0.21 0.55 1.42 0.76 2.50 0.22 RUNOFF 0.006 0.000 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 2.337 0.233 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED 0.0005 FROM LAYER 3 0.0000 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE, THROUGH 0.0175 LAYER 4 0.0000 1.80 2.02 0.57 0.62 0.17 0.244 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.005 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.387 0.263 0.470 1.823 0.618 1.967 1.030 1.665 0.482 0.321 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0007 0.0000 0.0236 0.0072 0.0023 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.0387 0.0041 0.1073 0.1001 0.0724 0.0000 0.0000 MONTHLY SUMMARIES FOR DAILY HEADS (INCHES) AVERAGE DAILY HEAD ON 0.009 TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 STD. DEVIATION OF DAILY 0.031 HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 0.000 0.431 0.000 0.096 0.000 0.132 0.000 0.086 0.000 0.044 0.000 0.041 0.012 0.000 0.020 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.000 * ******-*********************-***********-*************-****-***************** * ***** * **-*************************-********-***-*****************-****-************* * ***** ANNUAL TOTALS FOR YEAR 8 PERCENT PRECIPITATION 100.00 RUNOFF 2.10 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 95.52 DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 0.28 PERC./LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 2.80 AVG. HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 CHANGE IN WATER STORAGE 0.70 SOIL WATER AT START OF YEAR SOIL WATER AT END OF YEAR SNOW WATER AT START OF YEAR 0.00 SNOW WATER AT END OF YEAR 0.00 ANNUAL WATER BUDGET BALANCE 0.00 INCHES 12.14 0.255 11.596 0.0343 0.340391 0.0523 -0.085 258.107 258.021 0.000 0.000 0.0000 CU. FEET 44068.203 924.705 42092.566 124.621 1235. 619 -309.294 936927.312 936618.000 0.000 0.000 0.011 * -******-*********************-********************************************* * ***** * ************************************************************************ * ***** MONTHLY TOTALS (IN INCHES) FOR YEAR 9 JAN/ JUL FEB/AUG MAR/ SE P APR/OCT MAY/NOV JUN/ DEC PRECIPITATION 0.25 0.19 1.76 1.12 2.13 0.87 0.07 RUNOFF 0.000 0.000 1.99 1.02 1.03 0.58 0.23 0.000 0.000 0.061 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 0.178 0.282 0.432 1.936 1.886 1.545 0.070 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED 0.0000 FROM LAYER 3 0.0000 1.566 0.897 1.514 0.608 0.393 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0008 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0535 0.0084 0.0010 LAYER 4 0.0008 0.0000 0.0020 0.0008 0.0000 0.0000 MONTHLY SUMMARIES FOR DAILY HEADS (INCHES) AVERAGE DAILY HEAD ON 0.000 TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 STD. DEVIATION OF DAILY 0.000 HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0..000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.015 0.000 0.020 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.000 ************************************************************************* ****** -* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ***** * * * * ANNUAL TOTALS FOR YEAR 9 PERCENT PRECIPITATION 100.00 RUNOFF 0.54 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 100.60 DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 0.01 PERC./LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 0.59 AVG. HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 CHANGE IN WATER STORAGE 1.74 SOIL WATER AT START OF YEAR SOIL WATER AT END OF YEAR SNOW WATER AT START OF YEAR 0.00 SNOW WATER AT END OF YEAR 0.00 ANNUAL WATER BUDGET BALANCE 0.00 INCHES 11.24 0.061 11.307 0.0008 0.066407 0.0013 -0.196 258.021 257.826 0.000 0.000 0.0000 CU. FEET 40801.203 222.202 41044.742 2.989 241.056 -709.760 93661 8.000 935908.250 0.000 0.000 -0.027 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * ****** MONTHLY TOTALS (IN INCHES) FOR YEAR 10 JAN/JUL FEB/AUG MAR/SEP APR/OCT MAY/NOV JUN/DEC PRECIPITATION 0.48 0.68 0.25 2.55 0.82 2.44 0.53 RUNOFF 0.000 0.000 2.82 1.86 1.20 1.00 0.03 0.002 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 0.406 0.457 0.227 1.982 0.846 1.950 0.204 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED 0.0000 FROM LAYER 3 0.0000 3.445 1.253 1.441 0.953 0.364 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0030 0.0515 0.0297 0.0126 0.0006 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.0008 0.0033 0.0112 LAYER 4 0.0660 0.1096 0.1044 0.1065 0.0291 0.0000 MONTHLY SUMMARIES FOR DAILY HEADS (INCHES) AVERAGE DAILY HEAD ON 0.000 TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.055 0.939 0.559 0.230 0.011 STD. DEVIATION OF DAILY 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 0.111 0.120 0.103 0.091 0.022 0.000 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * ************************************************************************ * ***** ANNUAL TOTALS FOR YEAR 10 INCHES CU. FEET PERCENT PRECIPITATION 100.00 RUNOFF 0.01 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 92.28 DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 0.66 PERC./LEAKAGE / LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 2.94 AVG. HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 CHANGE IN WATER STORAGE 4.10 SOIL WATER AT START OF YEAR SOIL WATER AT END OF YEAR SNOW WATER AT START OF YEAR 0.00 SNOW WATER AT END OF YEAR 2.49 ANNUAL WATER BUDGET BALANCE 0.00 14.66 53215.805 0.002 7.818 13.529 49110.027 0.0975 353.839 0.430907 1564.192 0.1496 0.601 2179.863 257.826 258.061 0.000 935908.250 936761.125 0.000 0.366 1326.977 0.0000 0.066 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ***** * **fir****************;c *****7F ********>F*********;k**fir**** ******************** * ***** * * * * AVERAGE MONTHLY VALUES IN INCHES FOR YEARS 1 HROUGH 10 JUN/DEC PRECIPITATION TOTALS 1.99 0.37 1.17 0.26 STD. DEVIATIONS RUNOFF TOTALS 0.003 0.001 STD. DEVIATIONS 0.004 0.001 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION TOTALS 2.081 0.352 JAN/JUL FEB/AUG MAR/SEP APR/OCT MAY/NOV 0.46 0.39 1.76 1.27 0.38 0.28 0.63 0.59 0.041 0.004 0.001 0.001 0.083 0.007 0.001 0.002 0.285 1.538 1.04 1.44 1.34 0.72 0.52 0.73 0.68 0.42 0.059 0.064 0.001 0.000 0.078 0.126 0.003 0.000 0.355 0.597 1.115 1.516 2.15 0.36 1.64 0.35 0.040 0.000 0.119 0.000 1.461 1.951 0.610 0.612 STD. DEVIATIONS 0.141 0.198 0.313 0.766 1.142 1.048 0.932 0.433 0.188 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 TOTALS 0.0318 0.0063 STD. DEVIATIONS 0.0657 0.0187 0.505 0.271 0.413 0.0036 0.0016 0.0004 0.0016 0.0110 0.0347 0.0291 0.0243 0.0177 0.0103 0.0115 0.0050 0.0013 0.0032 0.0175 0.0603 0.0479 0.0416 0.0371 0.0264 PERCOLATION /LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 TOTALS 0.0623 0.0182 STD. DEVIATIONS 0.0490 0.0384 0.0108 0.0098 0.0108 0.0207 0.0441 0.0642 0.0572 0.0610 0.0457 0.0259 0.0343 0.0305 0.0330 0.0256 0.0446 0.0524 0.0524 0.0485 0.0539 0.0433 AVERAGES OF MONTHLY AVERAGED DAILY HEADS (INCHES) DAILY AVERAGE HEAD► ON TOP OF LAYER 4 AVERAGES 0.5981 0.1144 STD. DEVIATIONS 1$2382 0.3415 0.0663 0.0319 0.0073 0.0298 0.2001 0.6321 0.5305 0.4572 0.3217 0.1932 0.2097 0.1008 0.0230 0.0595 0.3186 1.0986 0.8724 0.7832 0.6766 0.4963 -*********-***********-*****-***-********-***-********************************** ****** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * ***** AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTALS & (STD. DEVIATIONS) FOR YEARS 1 THROUGH 10 INCHES CU. FEET PERCENT PRECIPITATION 13.30 ( 2.001) 48260.9 100.00 RUNOFF 0.212 ( 0.1956) 771.18 1.598 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 12.473 ( 1.3368) 45276.92 93.817 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED 0.17219 ( 0.30024) 625.040 1.29513 FROM. LAYER 3 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH 0.43064 ( 0.26706) 1563.210 3.23908 LAYER 4 AVERAGE HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 CHANGE IN WATER STORAGE 0.051 0.265 ( 0.462) 0.007 ( 0.4962) 24.49 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * PEAK DAILY VALUES FOR YEARS 1 THROUGH 10 (INCHES) (CU. FT.) PRECIPITATION RUNOFF DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 28.41975 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 14.62322 AVERAGE HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 1.96 0.379 0.00783 0.004028 4.423 MAXIMUM HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 8.103 LOCATION OF MAXIMUM HEAD IN LAYER 3 (DISTANCE FROM DRAIN) 70.5 FEET SNOW WATER MAXIMUM VEG. SOIL WATER (VOL/VOL) 7114.800 1374.9197 0.64 2324.3435 0.2936 MINIMUM VEG. SOIL WATER (VOL/VOL) 0.1330 *** Maximum heads are computed using McEnroe's equations. Reference: Maximum Saturated Depth over Landfill Liner by Bruce M. McEnroe, University of Kansas ASCE Journal of Environmental Engineering Vol. 119, No. 2, March 1993, pp. 262-270. *** * ****-*****-********************************-****************-*************** * **** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * **** FINAL WATER STORAGE AT END OF YEAR LAYER 1 2 3 4 SNOW WATER (INCHES) 1.8310 245.2799 0.2700 10.6800 0.366 10 (VOL/VOL) 0.1526 0.2920 0.0450 0.4450 * ************************************************************************ * **** * *********-***************-***********-******-***-************-**************** * **** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * **** * *** ********************************************************************* HYDROLOGIC EVALUATION OF LANDFILL PERFORMANCE HELP MODEL VERSION 3.07 (1 NOVEMBER 1997) DEVELOPED BY ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY USAF WATERWAYS EXPERIMENT STATION FOR USEPA RISK REDUCTION ENGINEERING LABORATORY * ************************************************************************ * **** * ************************************************************************ * **** PRECIPITATION DATA FILE: TEMPERATURE DATA FILE: SOLAR RADIATION DATA FILE: EVAPOTRANSPIRATION DATA: SOIL AND DESIGN DATA FILE: OUTPUT DATA FILE: TIME: 11:46 C:\NWPREC1.D4 C:\NWTEMPl.D7 C:\NWRAD1.D13 C:\NWEVAP12.D11 C:\NW SD 4.D10 C:\NW OUT 4.OUT DATE: 11/16/2016 * ************************************************************************ * **** TITLE: NORTH WELD LANDFILL SCENARIO 4: 156' WASTE WITH FINAL COVER THICKNESS POROSITY FIELD CAPACITY WILTING POINT INITIAL SOIL WATER CONTENT EFFECTIVE SAT. HYD. COND. THICKNESS POROSITY FIELD CAPACITY WILTING POINT INITIAL SOIL WATER CONTENT EFFECTIVE SAT. HYD. COND. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * ***** NOTE: INITIAL MOISTURE CONTENT OF THE LAYERS AND SNOW WATER WERE COMPUTED AS NEARLY STEADY-STATE VALUES BY THE PROGRAM. LAYER 1 TYPE 1 - VERTICAL PERCOLATION LAYER MATERIAL TEXTURE NUMBER 0 30.00 INCHES 0.3930 VOL/VOL 0.2990 VOL/VOL 0.1330 VOL/VOL 0.2468 VOL/VOL 0.119999997000E-03 CM/SEC LAYER 2 TYPE 1 - VERTICAL PERCOLATION LAYER MATERIAL TEXTURE NUMBER 18 1876.00 INCHES 0.6710 VOL/VOL 0.2920 VOL/VOL 0.0770 VOL/VOL 0.2920 VOL/VOL 0.100000005000E-02 CM/SEC LAYER 3 TYPE 2 - LATERAL DRAINAGE LAYER MATERIAL TEXTURE THICKNESS POROSITY FIELD CAPACITY WILTING POINT INITIAL SOIL WATER CONTENT EFFECTIVE SAT. HYD. COND. SLOPE DRAINAGE LENGTH NUMBER 1 6.00 INCHES 0.4170 VOL/VOL 0.0450 VOL/VOL 0.0180 VOL/VOL 0.0450 VOL/VOL 0.999999978000E-02 CM/SEC 2.64 PERCENT 845.0 FEET LAYER 4 TYPE 3 - MATERIAL THICKNESS POROSITY FIELD CAPACITY WILTING POINT INITIAL SOIL WATER CONTENT EFFECTIVE SAT. HYD. COND. BARRIER SOIL LINER TEXTURE NUMBER 0 24.00 INCHES 0.4450 VOL/VOL 0.3930 VOL/VOL 0.2770 VOL/VOL 0.4450 VOL/VOL 0.100000001000E-06 CM/SEC GENERAL DESIGN AND EVAPORATIVE ZONE DATA NOTE: SCS RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER WAS USER -SPECIFIED. SCS RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER FRACTION OF AREA ALLOWING RUNOFF AREA PROJECTED ON HORIZONTAL PLANE EVAPORATIVE ZONE DEPTH INITIAL WATER IN EVAPORATIVE ZONE UPPER LIMIT OF EVAPORATIVE STORAGE LOWER LIMIT OF EVAPORATIVE STORAGE INITIAL SNOW WATER INITIAL WATER IN LAYER MATERIALS TOTAL INITIAL WATER TOTAL SUBSURFACE INFLOW 85.00 100.0 1.000 12.0 2.129 4.716 1.596 0.000 566.146 566.146 0.00 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION AND WEATHER DATA NOTE: EVAPOTRANSPIRATION DATA WAS OBTAINED FROM CHEYENNE WYOMING STATION LATITUDE MAXIMUM LEAF AREA INDEX START OF GROWING SEASON (JULIAN DATE) END OF GROWING SEASON (JULIAN DATE) EVAPORATIVE ZONE DEPTH AVERAGE ANNUAL WIND SPEED AVERAGE 1ST QUARTER RELATIVE HUMIDITY AVERAGE 2ND QUARTER RELATIVE HUMIDITY alb PERCENT ACRES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES/YEAR 40.59 DEGREES 0.00 138 273 12.0 INCHES 7.50 MPH 52.00 % 54.00 o AVERAGE 3RD QUARTER RELATIVE HUMIDITY AVERAGE 4TH QUARTER RELATIVE HUMIDITY 50.00 o 51.00 N OTE: PRECIPITATION DATA WAS SYNTHETICALLY GENERATED USING COEFFICIENTS FOR CHEYENNE WYOMING JAN/JUL 0.41 1.87 NORMAL MEAN MONTHLY PRECIPITATION (INCHES) FEB/AUG 0.40 1.39 MAR/SEP 0.97 1.06 APR/OCT 1.24 0.68 MAY/NOV 2.39 0.53 JUN/ DEC N OTE: TEMPERATURE DATA WAS SYNTHETICALLY GENERATED USING COEFFICIENTS FOR CHEYENNE WYOMING JAN/JUL 26.10 68.90 NORMAL MEAN MONTHLY TEMPERATURE (DEGREES FAHRENHEIT) FEB/AUG 29.30 66.80 MAR/SEP 32.10 57.90 APR/OCT 41.80 47.50 MAY/N fV 52.20 34.80 2.00 0.37 JUN/DEC 62.00 29.30 N OTE: SOLAR RADIATION DATA WAS SYNTHETICALLY GENERATED USING COEFFICIENTS FOR CHEYENNE WYOMING AND STATION LATITUDE = 40.59 DEGREES * ************************************************************************ * ***** JUN/DEC PRECIPITATION 0.93 MONTHLY TOTALS (IN INCHES) FOR YEAR 1 JAN/JUL FEB/AUG MAR/SEP APR/OCT MAY/NOV 0.08 0.07 1.13 0.47 1.97 2.49 0.96 1.72 0.96 0.39 0.11 RUNOFF }} 0.000 0.000 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 0.927 0.189 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED 0.O227 FROM LAYER 3 0.0000 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH 0.1039 LAYER 4 0.0051 0.000 0.000 0.117 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.146 0.241 0.757 0.500 1.714 2.635 0.666 1.633 0.533 1.400 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0014 0.0074 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0003 0.0001 0.0001 0.0180 0.1010 0.0000 0.0002 0.0011 0.0017 MONTHLY SUMMARIES FOR DAILY HEADS (INCHES) AVERAGE DAILY HEAD ON 0.427 TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 STD. DEVIATION OF DAILY 0.070 HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 0.002 0.000 0.136 0.000 0.088 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.025 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.068 0.000 0.000 * ****************-***********-***********-************* ****-****************-* * ***** * *******************-********-********-***-*****************-****-************* * ***** ANNUAL TOTALS FOR YEAR 1 INCHES CU. FEET PERCENT PRECIPITATION 11.28 100.00 RUNOFF 1.03 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 100.54 DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 0.28 PERC./LEAKAGE T 2.05 ROUGH LAYER 4 AVG. HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 CHANGE IN WATER STORAGE 3.90 SOIL WATER AT START F YEAR SOIL WATER AT END OF YEAR SNOW WATER AT START OF YEAR 0.00 SNOW WATER AT END OF YEAR 0.00 ANNUAL WATER BUDGET BALANCE 0.00 0.117 11.340 0.0315 0.231322 0.0490 40946.406 423.764 41165.992 114.335 839.701 -0.440 -1597.209 566.146 2055110.620 565.706 2053513.370 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0000 -0.179 * -******-*********************-********************************************* * ***** * ************************************************************************ * ***** MONTHLY TOTALS (IN INCHES) FOR YEAR 2 JAN/ JUL FEB/AUG MAR/ SE P APR/OCT MAY/NOV JUN/ DEC PRECIPITATION 0.78 0.84 0.62 1.52 3.26 4.29 0.90 RUNOFF 0.013 0.000 1.89 0.54 1.27 0.12 0.30 0.005 0.014 0.057 0.000 0.022 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 0.574 0.739 0.330 1.353 2.961 3.897 0.603 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED 0.0361 FROM LAYER 3 0.0032 1.457 1.093 0.730 0.360 0.441 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0255 0.1100 0.0890 0.0600 0.0389 0.0184 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0834 0.1049 LAYER 4 0.1143 0.1126 0.1069 0.1086 0.1035 0.0662 MONTHLY SUMMARIES FOR DAILY HEADS (INCHES) AVERAGE DAILY HEAD ON 0.680 TOP OF LAYER 4 0.058 STD. DEVIATION OF DAILY 0.127 HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 0.063 0.000 2.004 0.000 0.344 0.000 1.623 0..000 0.159 0.000 1.130 0.000 0.131 0.000 0.709 0.000 0.116 0.464 0.347 0.389 0.096 ************************************************************************* ****** -* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ***** * * * * ANNUAL TOTALS FOR YEAR 2 INCHES CU. FEET PERCENT PRECIPITATION 100.00 RUNOFF 0.68 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 89.02 DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 2.33 PERC./LEAKAGE / LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 4.90 AVG. HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 CHANGE IN WATER STORAGE 3.06 SOIL WATER AT START OF YEAR SOIL WATER AT END OF YEAR SNOW WATER AT START OF YEAR 0.00 SNOW WATER AT END OF YEAR 0.00 ANNUAL WATER BUDGET BALANCE 0.00 16.33 0.111 14.538 0.3811 0.800314 0.5846 59277.898 402.739 52'171.543 1383.335 2905.139 0.500 1815.000 565.706 566.206 0.000 2053513,370 2055328.370 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.144 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * * * * * * * * * -* * * * -fir * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ****** MONTHLY TOTALS (IN INCHES) FOR YEAR 3 JAN/JUL FEB/AUG MAR/SEP APR/OCT MAY/NOV JUN/DEC PRECIPITATION 0.22 0.22 1.29 2.48 1.42 1.28 0.47 RUNOFF 0.000 0.005 0.86 0.51 1.78 1.43 0.28 0.000 0.000 0.236 0.285 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 0.220 0.135 0.460 2.704 1.428 1.774 0.373 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED 0.0038 FROM LAYER 3 0.0000 0.393 0.409 1.544 1.057 0.927 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0100 0.0197 0.0000 0.0000 0.0003 0.0001 0.0000 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0501 0.1070 0.0718 LAYER 4 0.0000 0.0001 0.0243 0.0224 0.0137 0.0000 MONTHLY SUMMARIES FOR DAILY HEADS (INCHES) AVERAGE DAILY HEAD ON 0.071 TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.188 0.360 0.000 0.000 0.006 0.001 0.000 STD. DEVIATION OF DAILY 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.240 0.094 0.069 HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 0.000 0.014 0.002 0.001 0.000 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * ************************************************************************ * ***** ANNUAL TOTALS FOR YEAR 3 INCHES CU. FEET PERCENT PRECIPITATION 100.00 RUNOFF 4.29 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 93.33 DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 0.28 PERC./LEAKAGE / LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 2.37 AVG. HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 CHANGE IN WATER STORAGE 0.26 SOIL WATER AT START OF YEAR SOIL WATER AT END OF YEAR SNOW WATER AT START OF YEAR 0.00 SNOW WATER AT END OF YEAR 0.00 ANNUAL WATER BUDGET BALANCE 0.00 12.24 0.526 11.423 0.0339 0.289525 0.0522 44431.207 1908.257 41466.527 123.143 1050.976 -0.032 -117.647 566.206 566.174 0.000 2055328.370 2055210.750 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0000 -0.049 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * ***** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ***** * * * * MONTHLY TOTALS (IN INCHES) FOR YEAR 4 JAN/JUL FEB/AUG MAR/SEP APR/OCT MAY/NOV JUN/DEC PRECIPITATION 0.17 0.59 0.59 0.77 1.97 1.30 0.53 RUNOFF 0.000 0.001 1.46 1.41 0.99 0.74 1.20 0.000 0.000 0.004 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 0.188 0.564 0.508 0.296 1.949 1.876 0.654 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED 0.0389 FROM LAYER 3 0.0000 0.757 1.483 1.366 0.586 0.639 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0013 0.0238 0.0061 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH 0.0000 0.0010 0.0000 0.0000 0.0343 0.1052 LAYER 4 0.1074 0.0913 0.0004 0.0017 0.0001 0.0001 MONTHLY SUMMARIES FOR DAILY HEADS (INCHES) AVERAGE DAILY HEAD ON 0.733 TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 STD. DEVIATION OF DAILY 0.148 HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.024 0.434 0.111 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.059 0.103 0.084 0.000 0.000 0.000 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * ************************************************************************ * ***** ANNUAL TOTALS FOR YEAR 4 PERCENT PRECIPITATION 100.00 RUNOFF 0.05 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 92.71 DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 0.60 PERC./LEAKAGE /LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 2.91 AVG. HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 CHANGE IN WATER STORAGE 3.73 SOIL WATER AT START OF YEAR SOIL WATER AT END OF YEAR SNOW WATER AT START OF YEAR 0.00 INCHES CU. FEET 11.72 0.006 10.865 0.0701 0.341491 0.1085 42543.613 20.514 39440.527 254.559 1239. 613 0.438 1588.347 566.174 566.611 0.000 2055210.750 2056799.120 0.000 SNOW WATER AT END OF YEAR 0.00 ANNUAL WATER BUDGET BALANCE 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.055 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * ************************-***-********-***-********************************** * ***** MONTHLY TOTALS (IN INCHES) FOR YEAR JUN/DEC JAN/JUL FEB/AUG MAR/SEP APR/OCT MAY/NOV PRECIPITATION 0.66 0.05 1.17 1.00 1.59 0.80 0.08 RUNOFF 0.000 0.000 1.51 2.03 2.55 1.00 0.68 0.136 0.000 0.000 0.030 0.000 0.004 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 0.330 0.494 0.790 1.606 1.992 0.406 0.488 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED 0.0000 FROM LAYER 3 0.0000 1.288 1.840 2.453 0.881 1.107 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0003 0.0001 0.0159 0.0075 0.0000 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH 0.0000 0.0000 0.0025 0.0047 0.0010 0.0000 LAYER 4 0.0179 0.0201 0.0996 0.1009 0.0018 0.0003 MONTHLY SUMMARIES FOR DAILY HEADS (INCHES) AVERAGE DAILY HEAD ON 0.000 TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 STD. DEVIATION OF DAILY 0.000 HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 0.000 0.006 0.000 0.015 0.000 0.002 0.000 0.004 0.000 0.300 0.000 0.171 0.000 0.136 0.000 0.089 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * -***-*******-****-*****************************************************-***** * ***** PERCENT ANNUAL TOTALS FOR YEAR 5 INCHES CU. FEET PRECIPITATION 13.12 100.00 RUNOFF 1.30 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 104.23 DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 0.18 PERC,/LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 1.90 AVG. HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 CHANGE IN WATER STORAGE 7.61 0.171 13.675 0.0239 0.248839 0.0371 47625.602 619.090 49639.984 86.637 903.285 -0.998 -3623.353 SOIL WATER AT START OF YEAR SOIL WATER AT END OF YEAR SNOW WATER AT START OF YEAR 0.00 SNOW WATER AT END OF YEAR 0.00 ANNUAL WATER BUDGET BALANCE 0.00 566.611 565.613 0.000 0.000 0.0000 2056799.120 2053175.750 0.000 0.000 -0.039 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * ************************************************************************ * ***** MONTHLY TOTALS (IN INCHES) FOR YEAR. 6 JUN/ DEC PRECIPITATION 2.22 0.41 RUNOFF 0.003 0.000 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 2.868 0.327 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED 0.2120 JAN/ JUL FEB/AUG MAR/ SE P APR/OCT MAY/NOV 0.13 0.58 1.94 0.79 1.30 2.02 0.90 6.33 0.05 0.04 0.000 0.009 0.115 0.000 0.379 0.000 0.000 0.008 0.000 0.000 0.130 0.186 0.671 0.631 4.629 1.136 0.908 2.002 0.415 0.040 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0438 FROM LAYER 3 0.0602 0.1774 0.1369 0.1301 0.1183 0*0842 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0017 0.0807 0.1190 LAYER 4 0.1197 0.1164 0.1125 0.1149 0.1088 0.1103 MONTHLY SUMMARIES FOR DAILY HEADS (INCHES) AVERAGE DAILY HEAD ON 3.992 TOP OF LAYER 4 1.097 STD. DEVIATION OF DAILY 0.257 HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 0.134 0.000 3.233 0.000 0.234 0.000 2.495 0.000 0.199 0.000 2.450 0.000 0.270 0.000 2.157 0.000 0.184 0.799 1.586 1.024 0.152 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * ************************************************************************ * ***** ANNUAL TOTALS FOR YEAR 6 PERCENT PRECIPITATION 100.00 RUNOFF 3.07 a 1 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION .44 DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 5.76 INCHES CU. FEET 16.71 0.513 13.943 0.9629 60657.316 1862.365 50611.609 3495.366 PERC./LEAKAGE / LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 5.29 0.883829 3208.299 AVG. HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 1.4840 CHANGE IN WATER STORAGE 2.44 SOIL WATER AT START OF YEAR SOIL WATER AT END OF YEAR SNOW WATER AT START OF YEAR 0.00 SNOW WATER AT END OF YEAR 0.41 ANNUAL WATER BUDGET BALANCE 0.00 0.408 1479.689 565.613 565.952 0.000 2053175.750 2054406.120 0.000 0.069 249.380 0.0000 -0.011 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * ************************************************************************ * ***** JUN/DEC MONTHLY TOTALS (IN INCHES) FOR YEAR 7 JAN/ JUL FEB/AUG MAR/SEP APR/OCT MAY/NOV PRECIPITATION 0.57 0.45 1.75 2.18 1.23 3.28 0.39 RUNOFF 0.006 0.000 0.86 1.55 0.29 0.68 0.28 0.020 0.018 0.000 0.320 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 0.287 0.190 1.329 1.781 1.486 3.230 0.737 1.568 0.808 0.227 0.487 0.383 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED 0.0020 , 0 FROM M LAYER 3 0.000 0.0369 0.0162 0.0044 0.0048 0.0098 0.0000 0.0014 0.0051 0.0000 0.0000 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH 0.1084 0.0965 0.1058 0.0591 0.1062 0.0879 LAYER 4 0.0047 0.0226 0.0872 0.0000 0.0001 0.0000 MONTHLY SUMMARIES FOR DAILY HEADS (INCHES) AVERAGE DAILY HEAD ON 0.038 TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 STD. DEVIATION OF DAILY 0.024 HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 0.673 0.328 0.080 0.090 0.178 0.000 0.026 0.095 0.000 0.000 0.115 0.089 0.046 0.124 0.060 0.002 0.069 0.069 0.000 0.000 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * ****************-*********************-*********************************** * ***** ANNUAL TOTALS FOR YEAR 7 PERCENT PRECIPITATION 100.00 INCHES CU. FEET 13.51 49041.297 RUNOFF 2.69 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 92.63 DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 0.60 PERC . /LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 5.02 AVG. HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 CHANGE IN WATER STORAGE 0.94 SOIL WATER AT START OF YEAR SOIL WATER AT END OF YEAR SNOW WATER AT START OF YEAR 0.51 SNOW WATER AT END OF YEAR 0.00 ANNUAL WATER BUDGET BALANCE 0.00 0.364 12.514 0.0806 0.678533 0.1257 1320.325 45425.711 292.724 2463.076 -0.127 -460.746 565. 952 565.894 0.069 20544O6.120 2054194.750 249.380 0.000 0.000 0.0001 0.210 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * -****-******-****-*******************************************-******-****-***** * ***** JUN/DEC MONTHLY TOTALS (IN INCHES) FOR YEAR 8 JAN/ JUL FEB/AUG MAR/SEP APR/OCT MAY/NOV PRECIPITATION 1.30 0.21 0.55 1.42 0.76 2.50 0.22 RUNOFF 0.006 0.000 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 2.337 0.233 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED 0.0011 FROM LAYER 3 0.0000 1.80 2.02 0.57 0.62 0.17 0.244 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.005 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.387 0.263 0.470 1.823 0.618 1.967 1.030 1.665 0.482 0.321 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0007 0.0000 0.0233 0.0071 0.0023 0.0000 0.0000 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE, THROUGH 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.0387 0.0041 0.0184 LAYER 4 0.1073 0.0991 0.0724 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 MONTHLY SUMMARIES FOR DAILY HEADS (INCHES) AVERAGE DAILY HEAD ON 0.021 TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 STD. DEVIATION OF DAILY 0.060 HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 0.000 0.425 0.000 0.095 0.000 0.129 0.000 0.086 0.000 0.044 0.000 0.041 0.012 0.000 0.020 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.000 * ******-*********************-***********-*************-****-***************** * ***** * **-*************************-********-***-*****************-****-************* * ***** ANNUAL TOTALS FOR YEAR 8 INCHES CU. FEET PERCENT PRECIPITATION 100.00 RUNOFF 2.10 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 95.52 DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 0.28 PERC./LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 2.80 AVG. HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 CHANGE IN WATER STORAGE 0.70 SOIL WATER AT START OF YEAR SOIL WATER AT END OF YEAR SNOW WATER AT START OF YEAR 0.00 SNOW WATER AT END OF YEAR 0.00 ANNUAL WATER BUDGET BALANCE 0.00 12.14 0.255 11.596 0.0345 0.340258 0.0526 44068.203 924.705 42092.566 125.103 1235.138 -0.085 -309.294 565.894 565.809 0.000 2054194.750 2053885.370 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0000 -0.012 * -******-*********************-********************************************* * ***** * ************************************************************************ * ***** MONTHLY TOTALS (IN INCHES) FOR YEAR 9 JAN/ JUL FEB/AUG MAR/ SE P APR/OCT MAY/NOV JUN/ DEC PRECIPITATION 0.25 0.19 1.76 1.12 2.13 0.87 0.07 RUNOFF 0.000 0.000 1.99 1.02 1.03 0.58 0.23 0.000 0.000 0.061 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 0.178 0.282 0.432 1.936 1.886 1.545 0.070 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED 0.0000 FROM LAYER 3 0.0000 1.566 0.897 1.514 0.608 0.393 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0008 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0535 0.0084 0.0010 LAYER 4 0.0008 0.0000 0.0020 0.0008 0.0000 0.0000 MONTHLY SUMMARIES FOR DAILY HEADS (INCHES) AVERAGE DAILY HEAD ON 0.000 TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 STD. DEVIATION OF DAILY 0.000 HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0..000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.015 0.000 0.020 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.000 ************************************************************************* ****** -* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ***** * * * * ANNUAL TOTALS FOR YEAR 9 PERCENT PRECIPITATION 100.00 RUNOFF 0.54 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 100.60 DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 0.01 PERC./LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 0.59 AVG. HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 CHANGE IN WATER STORAGE 1.74 SOIL WATER AT START OF YEAR SOIL WATER AT END OF YEAR SNOW WATER AT START OF YEAR 0.00 SNOW WATER AT END OF YEAR 0.00 ANNUAL WATER BUDGET BALANCE 0.00 INCHES 11.24 0.061 11.307 0.0008 0.066407 0.0013 -0.195 565.809 565.613 0.000 0.000 0.0000 CU. FEET 40801.203 222.202 41044.742 2.988 241.057 -709 649 2053885.370 2053175.750 0.000 0.000 -0.138 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * ****** MONTHLY TOTALS (IN INCHES) FOR YEAR 10 JAN/JUL FEB/AUG MAR/SEP APR/OCT MAY/NOV JUN/DEC PRECIPITATION 0.48 0.68 0.25 2.55 0.82 2.44 0.53 RUNOFF 0.000 0.000 2.82 1.86 1.20 1.00 0.03 0.002 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 0.406 0.457 0.227 1.982 0.846 1.950 0.204 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED 0.0000 FROM LAYER 3 0.0000 3.445 1.253 1.441 0.953 0.364 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0030 0.0502 0.0296 0.0125 0.0006 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.0008 0.0033 0.0112 LAYER 4 0.0686 0.1095 0.1044 0.1064 0.0283 0.0000 MONTHLY SUMMARIES FOR DAILY HEADS (INCHES) AVERAGE DAILY HEAD ON 0.000 TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.055 0.915 0.557 0.228 0.011 STD. DEVIATION OF DAILY 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 0.088 0.134 0.103 0.091 0.021 0.000 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * ************************************************************************ * ***** ANNUAL TOTALS FOR YEAR 10 INCHES CU. FEET PERCENT PRECIPITATION 100.00 RUNOFF 0.01 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 92.28 DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 0.65 PERC./LEAKAGE / LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 2.95 AVG. HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 CHANGE IN WATER STORAGE 4.10 SOIL WATER AT START OF YEAR SOIL WATER AT END OF YEAR SNOW WATER AT START OF YEAR 0.00 SNOW WATER AT END OF YEAR 2.49 ANNUAL WATER BUDGET BALANCE 0.00 14.66 53215.805 0.002 7.818 13.529 49110.027 0.0959 347.957 0.432527 1570.074 0.1471 0.600 2179.752 565.613 565.848 0.000 2053175.750 2054028.500 0.000 0.366 1326.977 0.0000 0.177 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * ***** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ***** * * * * MONTHLY TOTALS (IN INCHES) FOR YEAR 11 JAN/JUL FEB/AUG MAR/SEP APR/OCT MAY/NOV JUN/DEC PRECIPITATION 0.16 0.47 0.75 0.78 1.74 1.48 0.55 RUNOFF 0.000 0.000 1.41 1.54 0.95 0.65 1.20 0.018 0.000 0.014 0.000 0.017 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 0.315 0.470 0.563 0.516 2.211 1.760 0.534 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED 0.0014 FROM LAYER 3 0.0000 0.411 1.612 1.408 0.850 0.609 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0028 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.0377 0.0562 LAYER 4 0.0001 0.0003 0.0019 0.0004 0.0013 0.0000 MONTHLY SUMMARIES FOR DAILY HEADS (INCHES) AVERAGE DAILY HEAD ON 0.027 TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 STD. DEVIATION OF DAILY 0.038 HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.051 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.075 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * ************************************************************************ * ***** ANNUAL TOTALS FOR YEAR 11 PERCENT PRECIPITATION 100.00 RUNOFF 0.41 INCHES CU. FEET 11.68 0.048 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 11.257 96.38 DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 0.04 PERC./LEAKAGE / LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 0.84 0.0042 0.098163 AVG. HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 0.0065 CHANGE IN WATER STORAGE 2.33 SOIL WATER AT START OF YEAR SOIL WATER AT END OF YEAR SNOW WATER AT START OF YEAR 3.13 42398.414 175.457 40861.559 15.334 356.330 0.273 989.851 565.848 566.486 0.366 2054028.500 2056345.370 1326.977 SNOW WATER AT END OF YEAR 0.00 ANNUAL WATER BUDGET BALANCE 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.0000 -0.117 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * ************************-***-********-***-********************************** * ***** MONTHLY TOTALS (IN INCHES) FOR YEAR 12 JUN/DEC JAN/JUL FEB/AUG MAR/SEP APR/OCT MAY/NOV PRECIPITATION 0.47 0.18 0.58 1.56 1.75 1.43 0.53 RUNOFF }} 0.000 0.000 1.39 1.23 1.29 0.23 0.89 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 0.470 0.215 0.564 1.506 1.935 1.287 0.494 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED 0.0000 FROM LAYER 3 0.0000 1.793 0.833 1.445 0.742 0.450 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0007 0.0012 0.0010 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0007 0.0474 0.0065 LAYER 4 0.0354 0.0414 0.0082 0.0007 0.0018 0.0001 MONTHLY SUMMARIES FOR DAILY HEADS (INCHES) AVERAGE DAILY HEAD ON 0.000 TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 STD. DEVIATION OF DAILY 0.001 HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 0.000 0.021 0.000 0.044 0.000 0.019 0.O00 0.031 0.000 0.O00 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.013 0.000 0.016 0.000 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * -***-*******-****-*****************************************************-***** * ***** PERCENT ANNUAL TOTALS FOR YEAR 12 PRECIPITATION 100.00 RUNOFF 0.00 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 101.77 DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 0.03 PERC,/LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 1.23 AVG. HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 CHANGE IN WATER STORAGE 3.03 INCHES CU. FEET 11.53 0.000 11.734 0.0029 0.142245 0.0045 41853.914 0.000 42593.227 10.619 516.351 -0.349 -1266.313 SOIL WATER AT START OF YEAR SOIL WATER AT END OF YEAR SNOW WATER AT START OF YEAR 0.00 SNOW WATER AT END OF YEAR 0.85 ANNUAL WATER BUDGET BALANCE 0.00 566.486 566.040 0.000 2056345.370 2054725.120 0.000 0.098 353.937 0.0000 0.030 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * ************************************************************************ * ***** MONTHLY TOTALS (IN INCHES) FOR YEAR 13 JUN/ DEC JAN/ JUL FEB/AUG MAR/ SE P APR/OCT MAY/N0V PRECIPITATION 0.00 0.16 0.64 0.86 3.64 1.42 0.00 RUNOFF 0.001 0.000 1.39 0.99 1.24 0.24 0.60 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.009 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 0.098 0.112 0.490 0.714 3.166 1.181 0.073 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0091 0.0570 1.852 0.712 1.665 0.512 0.343 FROM LAYER 3 0.0367 0.0174 0.0022 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.0433 0.1066 LAYER 4 0.1084 0.1068 0.0564 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 MONTHLY SUMMARIES FOR DAILY HEADS (INCHES) AVERAGE DAILY HEAD ON 1.074 TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 STD. DEVIATION OF DAILY 0.122 HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.165 0.670 0.316 0.042 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.251 0.110 0.098 0.051 0.000 0.000 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * ************************************************************************ * ***** ANNUAL TOTALS FOR YEAR 13 PERCENT PRECIPITATION 100.O0 RUNOFF 0.08 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 97.66 DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 1.10 INCHES CU. FEET 11.18 0.009 10.918 0.1225 40583.410 34.127 39632.270 444.573 PERC./LEAKAGE / LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 3.77 AVG. HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 CHANGE IN WATER STORAGE 2.61 SOIL WATER AT START OF YEAR SOIL WATER AT END OF YEAR SNOW WATER AT START OF YEAR 0.87 SNOW WATER AT END OF YEAR 0.00 ANNUAL WATER BUDGET BALANCE 0.00 0.421707 0.1890 -0.292 566.040 565.846 0.098 0.000 0.0000 1530.797 -1058.491 2054725.120 2054020.620 353.937 0.000 0.137 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * ************************************************************************ * ***** JUN/DEC PRECIPITATION 1.35 0.08 RUNOFF 0.000 0.000 MONTHLY TOTALS (IN INCHES) FOR YEAR 14 JAN/ JUL FEB/AUG MAR/SEP APR/OCT MAY/NOV 0.42 0.10 0.94 1.72 0.93 2.54 0.77 2.34 0.93 0.15 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 0.770 0.333 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED 0.0000 FROM LAYER 3 0.0002 0.420 0.118 0.385 0.508 2.703 1.241 1.726 2.461 0.881 0.363 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0016 0.0000 0.0000 0.0011 0.0023 0.0001 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0007 0.0887 0.0094 LAYER 4 0.0009 0.0056 0.0284 0.0585 0.0159 0.0300 MONTHLY SUMMARIES FOR DAILY HEADS (INCHES) AVERAGE DAILY HEAD ON 0.001 TOP OF LAYER 4 0.004 STD. DEVIATION OF DAILY 0.003 HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 0.008 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.O00 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.000 0.045 0■000 0.O43 0.000 0.050 0.029 0.001 0.023 0.003 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * *************************************-*********************************** * ***** ANNUAL TOTALS FOR YEAR 14 PERCENT PRECIPITATION 100.00 INCHES CU. FEET 12.27 44540.113 RUNOFF 0.00 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 97.07 DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 0.04 PERC./LEAKAGE / LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 1.94 AVG. HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 CHANGE IN WATER STORAGE 0.95 SOIL WATER AT START OF YEAR SOIL WATER AT END OF YEAR SNOW WATER AT START OF YEAR 0.00 SNOW WATER AT END OF YEAR 0.00 ANNUAL WATER BUDGET BALANCE 0.00 0.000 11.910 0.0053 0.238129 0.0082 0.000 43234.539 19.406 864.406 0.116 421.846 565.846 565.962 0.000 2054020.620 2054442.370 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0000 -0.085 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * ***-*******-****-*************************************************-****-***** * ***** JUN/ DEC MONTHLY TOTALS (TN INCHES) FOR YEAR 15 JAN/ JUL FEB/AUG MAR/SEP APR/OCT MAY/NOV PRECIPITATION 0.42 0.00 0.66 2.16 1.41 2.00 1 42 0.32 0.72 0.71 0.49 0.51 RUNOFF F F 0.001 0.005 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 1.418 0.251 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED 0.0009 FROM LAYER 3 0.0000 0.008 0.000 0.036 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.291 0.000 0.301 2.295 1.752 1.209 0.700 0.521 1.294 0.325 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0007 0.0002 0.0234 0.0070 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE, THROUGH 0.0000 0.0000 0.0006 0.0337 0.0252 0.0208 LAYER 4 0.1073 0.1049 0.0006 0.0064 0.0000 0.0000 MONTHLY SUMMARIES FOR DAILY HEADS (INCHES) AVERAGE DAILY HEAD ON 0.017 TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 STD. DEVIATION OF DAILY 0.053 HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 0.000 0.427 0.000 0.095 0.000 0.127 0.000 0.084 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.013 0.001 0.023 0.002 0.005 0.000 0.010 0.000 * ******-******-****-*******-****-***********-*************-****-*********** ****** * ***** * **-*************************-********-***-*****************-****-************* * ***** ANNUAL TOTALS FOR YEAR 15 INCHES CU. FEET PERCENT PRECIPITATION 100.00 RUNOFF 0.49 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 95.72 DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 0.30 PERC./LEAKAGE T 2.77 ROUGH LAYER 4 AVG. HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 CHANGE IN WATER STORAGE 0.72 SOIL WATER AT START OF YEAR SOIL WATER AT END OF YEAR SNOW WATER AT START OF YEAR 0.00 SNOW WATER AT END OF YEAR 1.22 ANNUAL WATER BUDGET BALANCE 0.00 10.82 0.053 10.357 0.0323 0.299463 0.0491 39276.605 193.125 37594.523 117.143 1087.050 0.078 284.662 565.962 565. 908 0.000 2054442.370 2054246.750 0.000 0.132 480.298 0.0000 0.103 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * ************************************************************************ * ***** MONTHLY TOTALS (IN INCHES) FOR YEAR 16 JAN/ JUL FEB/AUG MAR/ SE P APR/OCT MAY/NOV JUN/ DEC PRECIPITATION 0.25 0.44 0.66 1.04 3.59 0.86 0.07 RUNOFF 0.000 0.000 2.86 0.42 0.96 0.91 0.36 0.000 0.014 0.013 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 0.382 0.299 0.575 0.474 3.070 1.577 0.265 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED 0.0111 FROM LAYER 3 0.0000 2.511 1.075 0.395 0.947 0.725 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0163 0.0004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.0000 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0823 0.1029 LAYER 4 0.0242 0.0000 0.0000 0.0119 0.0000 0.0000 MONTHLY SUMMARIES FOR DAILY HEADS (INCHES) AVERAGE DAILY HEAD ON 0.208 TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 STD. DEVIATION OF DAILY 0.089 HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 0.000 0.007 0.000 0.015 0.000 0.000 0..000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.003 0.297 0.000 0.210 0.000 ************************************************************************* ****** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * ***** ANNUAL TOTALS FOR YEAR 16 INCHES CU. FEET PERCENT PRECIPITATION 100.00 RUNOFF 0.22 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 99.00 DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 0.22 PERC./LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 1.78 AVG. HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 CHANGE IN WATER STORAGE 1.23 SOIL WATER AT START OF YEAR SOIL WATER AT END OF YEAR SNOW WATER AT START OF YEAR 1.07 SNOW WATER AT END OF YEAR 0.00 ANNUAL WATER BUDGET BALANCE 0.00 12.42 0.028 12.295 0.0278 0.221356 0.0428 45084.613 100.937 44632.457 100.937 803.524 -0.152 -553.190 565.908 565.888 0.132 2054246.750 2054173.870 480.298 0.000 0.000 0.0000 -0.051 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * * * * * * * * * -* * * * -fir * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ****** MONTHLY TOTALS (IN INCHES) FOR YEAR 17 JAN/JUL FEB/AUG MAR/SEP APR/OCT MAY/NOV JUN/DEC PRECIPITATION 0.62 0.06 1.13 1.55 2.81 2.70 0.67 RUNOFF 0.000 0.008 1.25 1.59 1.63 1.20 0.24 0.000 0.005 0.189 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 0.259 0.362 0.367 1.634 2.587 3.124 0.446 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED 0.0230 FROM LAYER 3 0.0000 0.643 1.673 1.701 1.405 0.475 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0017 0.0037 0.0112 0.0011 0.0004 0.0015 0.0001 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH 0.0000 0.0000 0.0038 0.0326 0.0595 0.1039 LAYER 4 0,1063 0.0392 0.0285 0.0458 0.0150 0.0000 MONTHLY SUMMARIES FOR DAILY HEADS (INCHES) AVERAGE DAILY HEAD ON 0.434 TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.032 0.068 0.204 0.020 0.008 0.028 0.002 STD. DEVIATION OF DAILY 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.052 0.127 0.046 HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 0.087 0.033 0.018 0.039 0.004 0.000 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * ************************************************************************ * ***** ANNUAL TOTALS FOR YEAR 17 INCHES CU. FEET PERCENT PRECIPITATION 100.00 RUNOFF 1.31 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 94.99 DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 0.28 PERC./LEAKAGE / LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 2.81 AVG. HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 CHANGE IN WATER STORAGE 0.61 SOIL WATER AT START OF YEAR SOIL WATER AT END OF YEAR SNOW WATER AT START OF YEAR 0.00 SNOW WATER AT END OF YEAR 0.29 ANNUAL WATER BUDGET BALANCE 0.00 15.45 56083.512 0.202 734.802 14.676 53275.406 0.0428 155.243 0.434551 1577.422 0.0662 0.094 340.571 565.888 565.936 0.000 2054173.870 2054349.370 0.000 0.045 165.098 0.0000 0.071 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * ***** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ***** * * * * MONTHLY TOTALS (IN INCHES) FOR YEAR 18 JAN/JUL FEB/AUG MAR/SEP APR/OCT MAY/NOV JUN/DEC PRECIPITATION 0.45 0.22 0.79 2.08 1.10 1.61 0.00 RUNOFF 0.000 0.000 0.92 1.08 0.40 0.11 0.54 0.033 0.000 0.008 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 0.295 0.220 0.639 1.326 1.830 1.865 0.115 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED 0.0106 FROM LAYER 3 0.0000 0.508 0.864 0.325 0.261 0.337 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0039 0.0294 0.0002 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0269 0.1078 0.1029 LAYER 4 0.0184 0.0002 0.0000 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 MONTHLY SUMMARIES FOR DAILY HEADS (INCHES) AVERAGE DAILY HEAD ON 0.200 TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 STD. DEVIATION OF DAILY 0.090 HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.074 0.536 0.004 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.169 0.108 0.012 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * ************************************************************************ * ***** ANNUAL TOTALS FOR YEAR 18 PERCENT PRECIPITATION 100.00 RUNOFF 0.44 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 92.30 DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 0.47 PERC./LEAKAGE /LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 2.76 AVG. HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 CHANGE IN WATER STORAGE 4.02 SOIL WATER AT START OF YEAR SOIL WATER AT END OF YEAR SNOW WATER AT START OF YEAR 0.49 INCHES 9.30 0.041 8.584 0.0442 0.256957 0.0678 0.374 565.936 566.356 0.045 CU. FEET 33759.008 148,641 31160.176 16 .315 932.755 1357.225 2054349.370 2055871.620 165.098 SNOW WATER AT END OF YEAR 0.00 ANNUAL WATER BUDGET BALANCE 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.0000 -0.104 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * ************************-***-********-***-********************************** * ***** MONTHLY TOTALS (IN INCHES) FOR YEAR 19 JUN/DEC JAN/JUL FEB/AUG MAR/SEP APR/OCT MAY/NOV PRECIPITATION 0.14 1.19 0.69 0.71 2.19 1.31 0.80 RUNOFF 0.000 0.000 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 1.376 0.484 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED 0.0122 FROM LAYER 3 0.0000 1.48 2.50 1.89 0.64 0.92 0.000 0.000 0.010 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.010 0.000 0.000 0.140 0.436 1.259 1.036 2.120 2.541 2.167 0.418 0.696 0.0000 0.0004 0.0027 0.0007 0.0103 0.0006 0.0000 0.0218 0.0218 0.0046 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH 0.0000 0.0251 0.0419 0.0369 0.0591 0.1030 LAYER 4 0.0281 0.0027 0.0789 0.1072 0.0796 0.0000 MONTHLY SUMMARIES FOR DAILY HEADS (INCHES) AVERAGE DAILY HEAD ON 0.229 TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 STD. DEVIATION OF DAILY 0.090 HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 0.000 0.010 0.000 0.021 0.008 0.000 0.017 0.000 0.049 0.410 0.066 0.312 0.014 0.397 0.025 0.102 0.187 0.087 0.209 0.075 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * -***-*******-****-*****************************************************-***** * ***** PERCENT ANNUAL TOTALS FOR YEAR 19 PRECIPITATION 100.00 RUNOFF 0.14 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 95.32 DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 0.52 PERC,/LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 3.89 AVG. HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 CHANGE IN WATER STORAGE 0.13 INCHES CU. FEET 14.46 52489.809 0.020 73.772 13.783 50030.992 0.0750 272.093 0.562604 2042.252 0.1159 0.019 70.677 SOIL WATER AT START OF YEAR SOIL WATER AT END OF YEAR SNOW WATER AT START OF YEAR 0.00 SNOW WATER AT END OF YEAR 0.00 ANNUAL WATER BUDGET BALANCE 0.00 566.356 566.375 0.000 2055871.620 2055942.370 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.021 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * ************************************************************************ * ***** MONTHLY TOTALS (IN INCHES) FOR YEAR 20 JUN/ DEC JAN/ JUL FEB/AUG MAR/ SE P APR/OCT MAY/N0V PRECIPITATION 0.08 0.19 1.88 1.13 2.01 2.60 0.38 RUNOFF 0.000 0.027 2.65 0.81 1.63 0.36 0.58 0.000 0.000 0.537 0.308 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.012 0.000 0.000 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 0.080 0.190 0.676 1.689 1.696 2.397 0.408 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0004 0.0000 0.0000 2.983 0.966 1.680 0.426 0.499 FROM LAYER 3 0.0003 0.0000 0.0081 0.0114 0.0004 0.0000 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH 0.0168 LAYER 4 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0249 0.0125 0.0259 0.0057 0.0543 0.1064 0.0224 MONTHLY SUMMARIES FOR DAILY HEADS (INCHES) AVERAGE DAILY HEAD ON 0.000 TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 STD. DEVIATION OF DAILY 0.000 HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 0.000 0.005 0.000 0.010 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.153 0.000 0.167 0.008 0.208 0.016 0.081 0.000 0.007 0.001 0.016 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * ************************************************************************ * ***** ANNUAL TOTALS FOR YEAR 20 PERCENT PRECIPITATION 100.0'�� RUNOFF 6.18 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 95.75 DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 0.14 INCHES CU. FEET 14.30 0.884 13.692 0.0206 51909.008 3208.853 49700.336 74.806 PERC./LEAKAGE / LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 1.88 0.268820 975.816 AVG. HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 0.0318 CHANGE IN WATER STORAGE 3.95 SOIL WATER AT START OF YEAR SOIL WATER AT END OF YEAR SNOW WATER AT START OF YEAR 0.00 SNOW WATER AT END OF YEAR 0.00 ANNUAL WATER BUDGET BALANCE 0.00 -0.565 -2050.737 566.375 565.810 0.000 2055942.370 2053891.620 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0000 -0.068 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * ************************************************************************ * ***** JUN/DEC MONTHLY TOTALS (IN INCHES) FOR YEAR 21 JAN/ JUL FEB/AUG MAR/SEP APR/OCT MAY/NOV PRECIPITATION 0.81 0.07 0.75 1.27 2.20 2.38 0.61 RUNOFF 0.000 0.000 0.75 0.36 1.13 0.67 0.35 0.000 0.000 0.012 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 0.558 0.442 0.559 0.370 2.177 2.768 0.850 0.419 0.465 1.013 0.755 0.269 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED 0.0181 , 0 FROM M LAYER 3 0.000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0211 0.0033 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.0839 0.1035 LAYER 4 0.0697 0.0004 0.0001 0.0028 0.0000 0.0000 MONTHLY SUMMARIES FOR DAILY HEADS (INCHES) AVERAGE DAILY HEAD ON 0.341 TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 STD. DEVIATION OF DAILY 0.093 HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 0.000 0.060 0.000 0.064 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.385 0.000 0.277 0.000 * ************************************************************************ * ************************************************************************ * ***** PERCENT ANNUAL TOTALS FOR YEAR 21 PRECIPITATION 100.00 INCHES CU. FEET 11.35 41200.504 RUNOFF 0.10 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 93.78 DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 0.37 PERC./LEAKAGE /LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 2.30 AVG. HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 CHANGE IN WATER STORAGE 3.44 SOIL WATER AT START OF YEAR SOIL WATER AT END OF YEAR SNOW WATER AT START OF YEAR 0.00 SNOW WATER AT END OF YEAR 0.00 ANNUAL WATER BUDGET BALANCE 0.00 0.012 10.644 0.0425 0.260509 0.0655 43.086 38638.992 154.264 945.648 0.391 1418.412 565.810 566.201 0.000 2053891.620 2055310.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.104 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * ***-*******-****-*************************************************-****-***** * ***** JUN/ DEC MONTHLY TOTALS (IN INCHES) FOR YEAR 22 JAN/ JUL FEB/AUG MAR/SEP APR/OCT MAY/NOV PRECIPITATION 0.52 0.34 1.40 2.15 2.74 3.31 1.75 0.98 1.02 0.85 0.43 0.59 RUNOFF 0.000 0.000 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 2.184 0.693 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED 0.0001 FROM LAYER 3 0.0000 0.000 0.007 0.384 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.503 0.192 0.915 2.211 2.925 2.804 0.745 0.990 0.884 0.596 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0013 0.0091 0.0008 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE, THROUGH 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.0213 0.1062 0.0129 LAYER 4 0.0401 0.0012 0.0044 0.0005 0.0002 0.0000 MONTHLY SUMMARIES FOR DAILY HEADS (INCHES) AVERAGE DAILY HEAD ON 0.002 TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 STD. DEVIATION OF DAILY 0.007 HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 0.000 0.015 0.000 0.023 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.024 0.000 0.070 0.000 0.166 0.000 0.073 0.000 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * ************************************************************************ * ***** ANNUAL TOTALS FOR YEAR 22 PERCENT PRECIPITATION 100.00 RUNOFF 2.44 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 97.28 DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 0.07 PERC,/LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 1.16 AVG. HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 CHANGE IN WATER STORAGE 0.95 SOIL WATER AT START OF YEAR SOIL WATER AT END OF YEAR SNOW WATER AT START OF YEAR 0.00 SNOW WATER AT END OF YEAR 0.00 ANNUAL WATER BUDGET BALANCE 0.00 INCHES 16.08 0.392 15.642 0.0113 0.187004 0.0173 -0.152 566.201 566.049 0.000 0.000 0.0000 CU. FEET 58370.406 1421.850 56780.402 41.152 678.826 -551.900 2055310.000 2054758.120 0.000 0.000 0.076 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * ************************************************************************ * ***** MONTHLY TOTALS (IN INCHES) FOR YEAR 23 JAN/JUL FEB/AUG MAR/SEP APR/OCT MAY/NOV JUN/ DEC PRECIPITATION 0.38 0.32 0.87 0.93 1.97 4.40 0.25 RUNOFF 0.065 0.000 1.59 1.72 0.59 0.39 0.93 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.050 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 0.368 0.417 0.683 0.606 2.128 4.004 0.352 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED 0.0188 FROM LAYER 3 0.0000 1.484 1.106 1.638 0.303 0.369 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0698 0.0452 0.0246 0.0093 0.0000 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH 0.0000 0.0009 0.0000 0.0000 0.0003 0.0514 LAYER 4 0.1110 0.1091 0.1040 0.1062 0.0063 0.0000 MONTHLY SUMMARIES FOR DAILY HEADS (INCHES) AVERAGE DAILY HEAD ON 0.353 TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 STD. DEVIATION OF DAILY 0.560 HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 0.000 1.273 0.000 0.143 0.000 0.823 0..000 0.122 0.000 0.463 0.000 0.085 0.000 0.169 0.000 0.091 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.003 ************************************************************************* ****** -* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ***** * * * * ANNUAL TOTALS FOR YEAR 23 INCHES CU. FEET PERCENT PRECIPITATION 100.00 RUNOFF 0.80 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 93.85 DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 1.17 PERC./LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 3.41 AVG. HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 CHANGE IN WATER STORAGE 0.76 SOIL WATER AT START OF YEAR SOIL WATER AT END OF YEAR SNOW WATER AT START OF YEAR 0.00 SNOW WATER AT END OF YEAR 0.14 ANNUAL WATER BUDGET BALANCE 0.00 14.34 0.115 13.459 0.1677 0.489177 0.2568 52054.199 417.081 48855.297 608.577 1775.711 0.110 397.499 566.049 566.139 0.000 2054758.120 2055083.620 0.000 0.020 72.031 0.0000 0.036 * ************************************************************************ * ***** -* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *-* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ****** * * * * MONTHLY TOTALS (IN INCHES) FOR YEAR 24 JAN/ JUL FEB/AUG MAR/SEP APR/OCT MAY/NOV JUN/DEC PRECIPITATION 0.31 1.14 0.98 1.13 2.75 1.45 0.48 RUNOFF 0.000 0.020 1.81 1.02 0.86 0.44 1.35 0.000 0.105 0.053 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 0.220 0.649 0.706 0.759 3.257 1.833 0.276 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED 0.0167 FROM LAYER 3 0.0000 0.999 1.287 1.570 0.537 0.607 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0017 0.0213 0.0063 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0445 0.1072 0.1034 LAYER 4 0.1008 0.0013 0.0006 0.0000 0.0001 0.0000 MONTHLY SUMMARIES FOR DAILY HEADS (INCHES) AVERAGE DAILY HEAD ON 0.315 TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.031 0.388 0.116 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 STD. DEVIATION OF DAILY 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.046 0.093 0.073 HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 0.067 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * ************************************************************************ * ***** ANNUAL TOTALS FOR YEAR 24 INCHES CU. FEET PERCENT PRECIPITATION 100.00 RUNOFF 1.30 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 92.58 DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 0.34 PERC./LEAKAGE / LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 2.61 AVG. HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 CHANGE IN WATER STORAGE 3.18 SOIL WATER AT START OF YEAR SOIL WATER AT END OF YEAR SNOW WATER AT START OF YEAR 0.14 SNOW WATER AT END OF YEAR 0.00 ANNUAL WATER BUDGET BALANCE 0.00 13.72 0.178 12.701 0.0460 0.357816 0.0708 49803.617 646.745 46105.707 167.039 1298.873 0.437 1585.220 566.139 566.595 0.020 2055083.620 2056740.870 72.031 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.035 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * ***** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ***** * * * * MONTHLY TOTALS (IN INCHES) FOR YEAR 25 JAN/JUL FEB/AUG MAR/SEP APR/OCT MAY/NOV JUN/DEC PRECIPITATION 0.11 0.32 0.73 0.78 3.40 1.81 0.19 RUNOFF 0.000 0.000 0.39 1.43 0.14 0.97 0.87 0.000 0.003 0.007 0.035 0.015 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 0.182 0.118 0.785 0.791 3.045 2.139 0.188 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED 0.0085 FROM LAYER 3 0.0000 0.512 1.463 0.516 0.591 0.640 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0048 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH 0.0000 0.0000 0.0004 0.0019 0.0670 0.1027 LAYER 4 0.0107 0.0029 0.0022 0.0001 0.0010 0.0005 MONTHLY SUMMARIES FOR DAILY HEADS (INCHES) AVERAGE DAILY HEAD ON 0.160 TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 STD. DEVIATION OF DAILY 0.079 HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.088 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.115 0.003 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * ************************************************************************ * ***** ANNUAL TOTALS FOR YEAR 23 PERCENT PRECIPITATION 100.00 RUNOFF 0.54 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 98.47 DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 0.12 PERC./LEAKAGE /LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 1.70 AVG. HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 CHANGE IN WATER STORAGE 0.83 SOIL WATER AT START OF YEAR SOIL WATER AT END OF YEAR SNOW WATER AT START OF YEAR 0.00 INCHES 11.14 0.061 10.969 0.0134 0.189297 0.0207 -0.092 566.595 566.503 0.000 CU. FEET 40438.199 219.939 39817.973 48.510 687.148 -335.217 2056740.870 2056405.620 0.000 SNOW WATER AT END OF YEAR 0.00 ANNUAL WATER BUDGET BALANCE 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.0000 -0.154 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * ************************-***-********-***-********************************** * ***** MONTHLY TOTALS (IN INCHES) FOR YEAR 26 JUN/DEC JAN/JUL FEB/AUG MAR/SEP APR/OCT MAY/NOV PRECIPITATION 0.87 0.45 0.68 1*17 1.01 2.83 0.52 RUNOFF 0.000 0.000 2.98 0.66 1.03 0.13 0.54 0.033 0.023 0.034 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 0.640 1.144 0.634 0.759 0.543 3.493 0.406 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED 0.0000 FROM LAYER 3 0.0000 2.659 0.727 1.387 0.562 0.213 0.0000 0.0000 0.0009 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH 0.0000 0.0041 0.0403 0.0001 0.0001 0.0026 LAYER 4 0.0006 0.0071 0.0064 0.0005 0.0000 0.0000 MONTHLY SUMMARIES FOR DAILY HEADS (INCHES) AVERAGE DAILY HEAD ON 0.000 TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 STD. DEVIATION OF DAILY 0.000 HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.016 0.000 0.025 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * -***-*******-****-*****************************************************-***** * ***** PERCENT ANNUAL TOTALS FOR YEAR 26 PRECIPITATION 100.00 RUNOFF 0.70 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 102.31 DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 0.01 PERC,/LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 0.48 AVG. HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 CHANGE IN WATER STORAGE 3.49 INCHES CU. FEET 12.87 0.090 13.167 0.0009 0.061782 0.0014 46718.098 326.133 47795.246 3.270 224.268 -0.449 -1630.886 SOIL WATER AT START OF YEAR SOIL WATER AT END OF YEAR SNOW WATER AT START OF YEAR 0.00 SNOW WATER AT END OF YEAR 0.00 ANNUAL WATER BUDGET BALANCE 0.00 566.503 566.054 0.000 0.000 0.0000 2056405.620 2054774.750 0.000 0.000 0.067 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * ************************************************************************ * ***** MONTHLY TOTALS (IN INCHES) FOR YEAR 27 JUN/ DEC PRECIPITATION 4.17 0.41 RUNOFF 0.000 0.000 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 4.090 0.627 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED 0.0101 JAN/ JUL FEB/AUG MAR/ SE P APR/OCT MAY/NOV 0.75 0.38 1.42 0.37 0.81 0.87 0.29 2.52 2.42 0.69 0.013 0.006 0.004 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.008 0.000 0.392 0.252 0.611 0.298 2.076 1.925 0.501 0.529 2.327 0.898 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0049 FROM LAYER 3 0.0027 0.0000 0.0000 0.0286 0.0327 0.0147 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0087 0.0850 0.1029 LAYER 4 0.0725 0.0135 0.0072 0.0839 0.1047 0.1066 MONTHLY SUMMARIES FOR DAILY HEADS (INCHES) AVERAGE DAILY HEAD ON 0.190 TOP OF LAYER 4 0.268 STD. DEVIATION OF DAILY 0.056 HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 0.096 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.089 0.050 0.000 0.000 0.521 0.615 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.084 0.053 0.001 0.000 0.396 0.108 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * ************************************************************************ * ***** ANNUAL TOTALS FOR YEAR 27 PERCENT PRECIPITATION 100.00 RUNOFF 0.20 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 96.20 DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 0.62 INCHES CU. FEET 15.10 0.030 14.527 0.0937 54813.020 110.184 52732 .148 340.227 PERC./LEAKAGE / LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 3.87 0.585121 2123.990 AVG. HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 0.1445 CHANGE IN WATER STORAGE 0.90 SOIL WATER AT START OF YEAR SOIL WATER AT END OF YEAR SNOW WATER AT START OF YEAR 0.00 SNOW WATER AT END OF YEAR 0.00 ANNUAL WATER BUDGET BALANCE 0.00 -0.136 -493.630 566.054 565.918 0.000 2054774.750 2054281.120 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.098 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * ************************************************************************ * ***** JUN/DEC MONTHLY TOTALS (IN INCHES) FOR YEAR 28 JAN/ JUL FEB/AUG MAR/SEP APR/OCT MAY/NOV PRECIPITATION 0.27 0.36 1.07 1.99 1.13 1.53 0.42 RUNOFF 0.000 0.006 0.58 2.15 0.49 1.36 0.13 0.000 0.000 0.208 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 0.345 0.237 0.575 1.044 1.884 2.199 0.555 1.504 0.610 0.812 1.124 0.238 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED 0.0000 , 0 FROM M LAYER 3 0.000 0.0011 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0013 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH 0.0390 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0443 0.0050 LAYER 4 0.0001 0.0012 0.0002 0.0002 0.0013 0.0000 MONTHLY SUMMARIES FOR DAILY HEADS (INCHES) AVERAGE DAILY HEAD ON 0.000 TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 STD. DEVIATION OF DAILY 0.001 HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 0.020 0.000 0.033 0.000 0.O00 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.023 0.000 0.034 0.000 * ************************************************************************ * ************************************************************************ * ***** PERCENT ANNUAL TOTALS FOR YEAR 28 PRECIPITATION 100.00 INCHES U. FEET 11.48 41672.414 RUNOFF 1.88 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 96.91 DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 0.02 PERC./LEAKAGE /LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 0.80 AVG. HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 CHANGE IN WATER STORAGE 0.40 SOIL WATER AT START OF YEAR SOIL WATER AT END OF YEAR SNOW WATER AT START OF YEAR 0.00 SNOW WATER AT END OF YEAR 0.00 ANNUAL WATER BUDGET BALANCE 0.00 0.215 11.126 0.0024 0.091284 0.0036 781.500 40385.734 8.649 331.361 0.046 165.282 565.918 565.963 0.000 2054281.120 2054446.370 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0000 -0.114 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * ***-*******-****-*************************************************-****-***** * ***** MONTHLY TOTALS (IN INCHES) FOR YEAR 29 JUN/ DEC JAN/ JUL FEB/AUG MAR/SEP APR/OCT MAY/NOV PRECIPITATION 0.66 0.15 0.74 1.25 2.01 1.26 2.30 1.53 0.01 0.49 0.42 0.29 RUNOFF 0.000 0.000 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 1.718 0.250 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED 0.0001 FROM LAYER 3 0.0000 0.002 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.522 1.802 0 .232 0.901 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.343 1.637 1.849 0.631 0.370 0.416 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.0003 0.0001 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 PERCOLATION/LEAKACF THROUGH 0.0000 0.0000 0.0003 0.0017 0.0153 0.0121 LAYER 4 0.0128 0.0136 0.0252 0.0096 0.0015 0.0000 MONTHLY SUMMARIES FOR DAILY HEADS (INCHES) AVERAGE DAILY HEAD ON 0.001 TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 STD. DEVIATION OF DAILY 0.003 HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.003 0.005 0.002 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.008 0.013 0.005 0.001 0.000 0.000 * ******-***********-**********-***********-*************-****-*********** ****** * ***** * **-*************************-********-***-*****************-****-************* * ***** ANNUAL TOTALS FOR YEAR 29 INCHES CU. FEET PERCENT PRECIPITATION 100.00 RUNOFF 0.02 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 96.05 DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 0.01 PERC./LEAKAGE / LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 0.83 AVG. HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 CHANGE IN WATER STORAGE 3.10 SOIL WATER AT START OF YEAR SOIL WATER AT END OF YEAR SNOW WATER AT START OF YEAR 0.00 SNOW WATER AT END OF YEAR 0.00 ANNUAL WATER BUDGET BALANCE 0.00 11.11 0.002 10.672 0.0006 0.092110 0.0009 40329.301 6.109 38737.605 2.205 334.359 0.344 1248.920 565.963 566.307 0.000 2054446.370 2055695.370 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.104 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * ************************************************************************ * ***** MONTHLY TOTALS (IN INCHES) FOR YEAR 30 JAN/JUL FEB/AUG MAR/SEP APR/OCT MAY/NOV JUN/DEC PRECIPITATION 0.24 0.66 0.68 1.56 3.08 1.83 0.30 RUNOFF 0.000 0.007 2.62 2.73 0.92 0.49 0.99 0.000 0.005 0.033 0.000 0.000 0.003 0.006 0.000 0.000 0.000 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 0.201 0.563 0.522 1.651 3.019 1.896 2.741 2.686 0.965 0.461 0.500 0.805 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0043 0.0005 0.0000 FROM LAYER 3 0.0020 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0703 0.0327 0.0043 LAYER 4 0.0595 0.0088 0.0014 0.0017 0.0005 0.0006 MONTHLY SUMMARIES FOR DAILY HEADS (INCHES) AVERAGE DAILY HEAD ON 0.000 TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 STD. DEVIATION OF DAILY 0.001 HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 0.000 0.000 0.037 0.000 0.046 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.081 0.000 0.066 0.000 0.009 0.000 0.015 0.000 ************************************************************************* ****** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * ***** ANNUAL TOTALS FOR YEAR 30 INCHES CU. FEET PERCENT PRECIPITATION 100.00 RUNOFF 0.34 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 99.45 DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 0.04 PERC./LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 1.12 AVG. HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 CHANGE IN WATER STORAGE 0.95 SOIL WATER AT START OF YEAR SOIL WATER AT END OF YEAR SNOW WATER AT START OF YEAR 0.00 SNOW WATER AT END OF YEAR 0.00 ANNUAL WATER BUDGET BALANCE 0.00 16.10 0.055 16.012 0.0069 0.179916 0.0106 58443.027 200.533 58122.187 24.871 653.096 -0.154 -557.661 566.307 566.154 0.000 2055695.370 2055137 620 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.005 * ************************************************************************ * ***** -* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ****** * * * * AVERAGE MONTHLY VALUES IN INCHES FOR YEARS 1 THROUGH 30 JAN/ JUL FEB/AUG MAR/SEP APR/OCT MAY/NOV JUN/DEC PRECIPITATION TOTALS 0.42 0.37 0.93 1.32 2.23 2.05 1.65 1.26 1.12 0.71 0.54 0.38 STD. DEVIATIONS 0.30 0.30 0.39 0.60 1.12 1.02 0.24 0.70 0.65 0.63 0.49 0.36 RUNOFF TOTALS 0.017 0.007 0.071 0.034 0.015 0.003 0 . X000 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.003 STD. DEVIATIONS IATIONS 0 . X050 0.019 0.126 0.092 0.069 0.012 0.001 0.001 0.003 0.001 0.000 0.006 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION TOTALS 0.318 0.341 0.604 1.215 2.183 2.130 1.533 1.173 1.274 0.723 0.569 0.368 STD. DEVIATIONS 0.150 0.232 0.246 0.677 0.854 0.946 0.868 0.558 0.614 0.425 0.292 0.186 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 TOTALS 0.0168 0.0026 0.0013 0.0006 0.0003 0.0010 0.0080 0.0168 0.0121 0.0101 0.0084 0.0047 STD. DEVIATIONS 0.0394 0.0112 0.0067 0.0030 0.0009 0.0022 0.0110 0■0386 0.0307 0.0261 0.0228 0.0165 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 TOTALS 0.0584 0.0107 STD. DEVIATIONS 0.0460 0.0296 0.0049 0.0043 0.0065 0.0171 0.0517 0.0525 0.0346 0.0340 0.0333 0.0170 0.0208 0.0180 0.0214 0.0219 0.0380 0.0452 0.0453 0.0413 0.0457 0.0338 AVERAGES OF MONTHLY AVERAGED DAILY HEADS (INCHES) DAILY AVERAGE HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 AVERAGES 0.3172 0.0476 STD. DEVIATIONS 0.7425 0.2044 0.0231 0.0112 0.0048 0.0195 0.1450 0.3066 0.2203 0.1893 0.1533 0.0886 0.1229 0.0598 0.0169 0.0406 0.2011 0.7035 0.5591 0.4921 0.4162 0.3099 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * ************************************************************************ * ***** AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTALS & (STD. DEVIATIONS) FOR YEARS 1 THROUGH 30 PERCENT INCHES CU. FEET PRECIPITATION 100.00 RUNOFF 1.170 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 95.689 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED 0.63597 FROM LAYER 3 12.99 ( 1.958) 47147.7 0.152 ( 0.2029) 551.82 12.428 ( 1.7363) 45115.21 0.08260 ( 0.18195) 299.846 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH 0.32504 ( 0.21041) 1179.878 2.50252 LAYER 4 AVERAGE HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 CHANGE IN WATER STORAGE 0.002 0.127 ( 0.280) 0.000 ( 0.3603) 0.90 ************************************************************************* ****** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * PEAK DAILY VALUES FOR YEARS 1 THROUGH 30 (INCHES) (CU. FT. ) PRECIPITATION RUNOFF DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 28.26786 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 14.61106 AVERAGE HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 1.96 0.379 0.00779 0.004025 4.400 MAXIMUM HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 8.062 LOCATION OF MAXIMUM HEAD IN LAYER 3 (DISTANCE FROM DRAIN) 70.3 FEET SNOW WATER 7114.800 1374. 9197 1.00 3627.4089 MAXIMUM VEG. SOIL WATER (VOL/VOL) 0.2936 MINIMUM VEG. SOIL WATER (VOL/VOL) 0.1330 *** Maximum heads are computed using McEnroe's equations. Reference: Maximum Saturated Depth over Landfill Liner by Bruce M. McEnroe, University of Kansas ASCE Journal of Environmental Engineering Vol. 119, No. 2, March 1993, pp. 262-270. *** * *****-********-***-*************************-****************-*************** * **** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * **** FINAL WATER STORAGE AT END OF YEAR 30 LAYER 1 2 3 4 SNOW WATER (INCHES) (VOL/VOL) 7.4116 547.7 920 0.2700 10.6800 0.000 0.2471 0.2920 0.0450 0.4450 * ************************************************************************ * **** * *********-***************-***********-******-***-************-**************** * **** ATTACHMENT 2 SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS HELP MODEL OUTPUT * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * **** * *** ********************************************************************* HYDROLOGIC EVALUATION OF LANDFILL PERFORMANCE HELP MODEL VERSION 3.07 (1 NOVEMBER 1997) DEVELOPED BY ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY USAF WATERWAYS EXPERIMENT STATION FOR USEPA RISK REDUCTION ENGINEERING LABORATORY * ************************************************************************ * **** * ************************************************************************ * **** PRECIPITATION DATA FILE: TEMPERATURE DATA FILE: SOLAR RADIATION DATA FILE: EVAPOTRANSPIRATION DATA: SOIL AND DESIGN DATA FILE: OUTPUT DATA FILE: TIME: 11:51 C:\NWPREC1.D4 C:\NWTEMPl.D7 C:\NWRAD1.D13 C:\NWEVAP.D11 C:\NW SD 2.A. D10 C:\NW OUT2A.OUT DATE: 11/16/2016 * ************************************************************************ * **** TITLE: NORTH WELD LANDFILL SCENARIO 2: 80'WASTE WITH DAILY COVER THICKNESS POROSITY FIELD CAPACITY WILTING POINT INITIAL SOIL WATER CONTENT EFFECTIVE SAT. HYD. COND. THICKNESS POROSITY FIELD CAPACITY WILTING POINT INITIAL SOIL WATER CONTENT EFFECTIVE SAT. HYD. COND. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * ***** NOTE: INITIAL MOISTURE CONTENT OF THE LAYERS AND SNOW WATER WERE COMPUTED AS NEARLY STEADY-STATE VALUES BY THE PROGRAM. LAYER 1 TYPE 1 - VERTICAL PERCOLATION LAYER MATERIAL TEXTURE NUMBER 0 6.00 INCHES 0.3930 VOL/VOL 0.2990 VOL/VOL 0.1330 VOL/VOL 0.1839 VOL/VOL 0.119999997000E-03 CM/SEC LAYER 2 TYPE 1 - VERTICAL PERCOLATION LAYER MATERIAL TEXTURE NUMBER 18 960.00 INCHES 0.6710 VOL/VOL 0.2920 VOL/VOL 0.0770 VOL/VOL 0.2920 VOL/VOL 0.100000005000E-02 CM/SEC LAYER 3 TYPE 2 - LATERAL DRAINAGE LAYER MATERIAL TEXTURE THICKNESS POROSITY FIELD CAPACITY WILTING POINT INITIAL SOIL WATER CONTENT EFFECTIVE SAT. HYD. COND. SLOPE DRAINAGE LENGTH NUMBER 1 6.00 INCHES 0.4170 VOL/VOL 0.0450 VOL/VOL 0.0180 VOL/VOL 0.0717 VOL/VOL 0.999999978000E-02 2.64 PERCENT 845.0 FEET CM/SEC LAYER 4 TYPE 3 - MATERIAL THICKNESS POROSITY FIELD CAPACITY WILTING POINT INITIAL SOIL WATER CONTENT EFFECTIVE SAT. HYD. COND. BARRIER SOIL LINER TEXTURE NUMBER 0 24.00 INCHES 0.4450 VOL/VOL 0.3930 VOL/VOL 0.2770 VOL/VOL 0.4450 VOL/VOL 0.100000001000E-06 CM/SEC GENERAL DESIGN AND EVAPORATIVE ZONE DATA NOTE: SCS RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER WAS USER -SPECIFIED. SCS RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER FRACTION OF AREA ALLOWING RUNOFF AREA PROJECTED ON HORIZONTAL PLANE EVAPORATIVE ZONE DEPTH INITIAL WATER IN EVAPORATIVE ZONE UPPER LIMIT OF EVAPORATIVE STORAGE LOWER LIMIT OF EVAPORATIVE STORAGE INITIAL SNOW WATER INITIAL WATER IN LAYER MATERIALS TOTAL INITIAL WATER TOTAL SUBSURFACE INFLOW 85.00 100.0 1.000 6.0 1.103 2.358 0.798 0.000 292.534 292.534 0.00 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION AND WEATHER DATA NOTE: EVAPOTRANSPIRATION DATA WAS OBTAINED FROM CHEYENNE WYOMING STATION LATITUDE MAXIMUM LEAF AREA INDEX START OF GROWING SEASON (JULIAN DATE) END OF GROWING SEASON (JULIAN DATE) EVAPORATIVE ZONE DEPTH AVERAGE ANNUAL WIND SPEED AVERAGE 1ST QUARTER RELATIVE HUMIDITY AVERAGE 2ND QUARTER RELATIVE HUMIDITY alb PERCENT ACRES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES/YEAR 40.59 DEGREES 0.00 138 273 6.0 INCHES 7.50 MPH 52.00 0 54.00 0 AVERAGE 3RD QUARTER RELATIVE HUMIDITY AVERAGE 4TH QUARTER RELATIVE HUMIDITY 50.00 o 51.00 N OTE: PRECIPITATION DATA WAS SYNTHETICALLY GENERATED USING COEFFICIENTS FOR CHEYENNE WYOMING JAN/JUL 0.41 1.87 NORMAL MEAN MONTHLY PRECIPITATION (INCHES) FEB/AUG 0.40 1.39 MAR/SEP 0.97 1.06 APR/OCT 1.24 0.68 MAY/NOV 2.39 0.53 JUN/ DEC N OTE: TEMPERATURE DATA WAS SYNTHETICALLY GENERATED USING COEFFICIENTS FOR CHEYENNE WYOMING JAN/JUL 26.10 68.90 NORMAL MEAN MONTHLY TEMPERATURE (DEGREES FAHRENHEIT) FEB/AUG 29.30 66.80 MAR/SEP 32.10 57.90 APR/OCT 41.80 47.50 MAY/N fV 52.20 34.80 2.00 0.37 JUN/DEC 62.00 29.30 N OTE: SOLAR RADIATION DATA WAS SYNTHETICALLY GENERATED USING COEFFICIENTS FOR CHEYENNE WYOMING AND STATION LATITUDE = 40.59 DEGREES * ************************************************************************ * ***** JUN/DEC PRECIPITATION 0.93 MONTHLY TOTALS (IN INCHES) FOR YEAR 1 JAN/JUL FEB/AUG MAR/SEP APR/OCT MAY/NOV 0.08 0.07 1.13 0.47 1.97 2.49 0.96 1.72 0.96 0.39 0.11 RUNOFF }} 0.000 0.000 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 0.513 0.201 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED 0.0920 FROM LAYER 3 0.0399 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH 0.1094 LAYER 4 0.1086 0.000 0.000 0.117 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.147 0.242 0.756 0.499 1.378 2.292 0.802 2.007 0.299 0.494 0.0146 0.0013 0.0000 0.0000 0.0111 0.1079 0.0880 0.0778 0.0598 0.0501 0.1066 0.0485 0.0015 0.0013 0.0460 0.1141 0.1125 0.1083 0.11:2 0.1061 MONTHLY SUMMARIES FOR DAILY HEADS (INCHES) AVERAGE DAILY HEAD ON 1.732 TOP OF LAYER 4 0.727 STD. DEVIATION OF DAILY 0.349 HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 0.117 0.265 1.966 0.095 0.209 0.026 1.604 0.036 0.156 0.000 1.465 0.000 0.113 0.000 1.089 0.000 0.134 0.203 0.944 0.289 0.051 * ****************-***********-***********-************* ****-****************-* * ***** * *******************-********-********-***-*****************-****-************* * ***** ANNUAL TOTALS FOR YEAR 1 INCHES CU. FEET PERCENT PRECIPITATION 100.00 RUNOFF 1.03 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 85.37 DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 4.81 PERC,/LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 8.63 AVG. HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 CHANGE IN WATER STORAGE 0.16 SOIL WATER AT START OF YEAR SOIL WATER AT END OF YEAR SNOW WATER AT START OF YEAR 0.00 SNOW WATER AT END OF YEAR 0.00 ANNUAL WATER BUDGET BALANCE 0.00 11.28 40946.406 0.117 423.764 9.630 34956.262 0.5424 1968.891 0.973135 3532.479 0.8351 0.018 65.027 292.534 292.552 0.000 1061897.000 1061962.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0000 -0.019 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * ************************************************************************ * ***** AVERAGE MONTHLY VALUES IN INCHES FOR YEARS 1 THROUGH 1 JAN/JUL FEB/AUG MAR/SEP APR/OCT MAY/NOV JUN/DEC PRECIPITATION TOTALS 0.93 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.08 2.49 STD, DEVIATIONS 0.00 RUNOFF TOTALS 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.000 0.07 1.13 0.96 1.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.117 0.47 1.97 0.96 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 STD. DEVIATIONS 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION TOTALS 0.513 0.201 0.000 0.147 2.292 0.000 0.000 0.242 0.756 0.802 2.007 0.000 0.000 0.499 1.378 0.299 0.494 STD. DEVIATIONS 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 TOTALS 0.0920 0.0399 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0146 0.0013 0.0000 0.0000 0.0111 0.1079 0.0880 0.0778 0.0598 0.0501 STD. DEVIATIONS 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 TOTALS 0.1094 0.1086 STD. DEVIATIONS 0.0000 0.0000 0.1066 0.0485 0.0015 0.0013 0.0460 0.1141 0.1125 0.1083 0.1102 0.1061 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 AVERAGES OF MONTHLY AVERAGED DAILY HEADS (INCHES) DAILY AVERAGE HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 AVERAGES 1.7318 0.7271 STD. DEVIATIONS 0.0000 0.0000 0.2653 0.0258 0.0000 0.0000 0.2029 1.9664 1.6043 1.4645 1.0891 0.9440 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * ************************************************************************ * ***** 1 AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTALS & (STD. DEVIATIONS) FOR YEARS 1 THROUGH PERCENT PRECIPITATION 100.00 RUNOFF 1.035 INCHES 11.28 0.000) 0.117 ( 0.0000) CU. FEET 40946.4 423.76 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 85.371 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED 4.80846 FROM. LAYER 3 9.630 ( 0.0000) 34956.26 0.54239 ( 0.00000) 1968.891 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH 0.97313 ( 0.00000) 3532.479 8.62708 LAYER 4 AVERAGE HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 CHANGE IN WATER STORAGE 0.159 0.835 ( 0.000) 0.018 ( 0.0000) 65.03 ************************************************************************* ****** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * PEAK DAILY VALUES FOR YEARS 1 THROUGH 1 (INCHES) (CU. FT.) PRECIPITATION RUNOFF DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 4.53737 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 13.51159 AVERAGE HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 0.64 0.117 0.00400 0.003722 2.263 MAXIMUM HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 4.284 LOCATION OF MAXIMUM HEAD IN LAYER 3 (DISTANCE FROM DRAIN) 44.4 FEET SNOW WATER 2323.200 423.7645 0.41 1476.5393 MAXIMUM VEG. SOIL WATER (VOL/VOL) 0.2614 MINIMUM VEG. SOIL WATER (VOL/VOL) 0.1330 *** Maximum heads are computed using McEnroe's equations. Reference: Maximum Saturated Depth over Landfill Liner by Bruce M. McEnroe, University of Kansas ASCE Journal of Environmental Engineering Vol. 119, No. 2, March 1993, pp. 262-270. *** * ************************************************************************ * **** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * **** FINAL WATER STORAGE AT END OF YEAR 1 LAYER 1 2 3 4 SNOW WATER (INCHES) (VOL/VOL) 1.0839 280.3199 0.4677 10.6800 0.000 0.1806 0.2920 0.0779 0.4450 * ************************************************************************ * **** * *********-***************-*****************-***-************-**************** * **** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * **** * *** ********************************************************************* HYDROLOGIC EVALUATION OF LANDFILL PERFORMANCE HELP MODEL VERSION 3.07 (1 NOVEMBER 1997) DEVELOPED BY ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY USAF WATERWAYS EXPERIMENT STATION FOR USEPA RISK REDUCTION ENGINEERING LABORATORY * ************************************************************************ * **** * ************************************************************************ * **** PRECIPITATION DATA FILE: TEMPERATURE DATA FILE: SOLAR RADIATION DATA FILE: EVAPOTRANSPIRATION DATA: SOIL AND DESIGN DATA FILE: OUTPUT DATA FILE: TIME: 11:52 C:\NWPREC1.D4 C:\NWTEMPl.D7 C:\NWRAD1.D13 C:\NWEVAP.D11 C: \NWSD2B 2B.D10 C ■ \N OUT2B.OUT `milUT DATE: 11/16/2016 * ************************************************************************ * **** TITLE: NORTH WELD LANDFILL SCENARIO 2: 90'WASTE WITH DAILY COVER THICKNESS POROSITY FIELD CAPACITY WILTING POINT INITIAL SOIL WATER CONTENT EFFECTIVE SAT. HYD. COND. THICKNESS POROSITY FIELD CAPACITY WILTING POINT INITIAL SOIL WATER CONTENT EFFECTIVE SAT. HYD. COND. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * ***** NOTE: INITIAL MOISTURE CONTENT OF THE LAYERS AND SNOW WATER WERE COMPUTED AS NEARLY STEADY-STATE VALUES BY THE PROGRAM. LAYER 1 TYPE 1 - VERTICAL PERCOLATION LAYER MATERIAL TEXTURE NUMBER 0 6.00 INCHES 0.3930 VOL/VOL 0.2990 VOL/VOL 0.1330 VOL/VOL 0.1839 VOL/VOL 0.119999997000E-03 CM/SEC LAYER 2 TYPE 1 - VERTICAL PERCOLATION LAYER MATERIAL TEXTURE NUMBER 18 1080.00 INCHES 0.6710 VOL/VOL 0.2920 VOL/VOL 0.0770 VOL/VOL 0.2920 VOL/VOL 0.100000005000E-02 CM/SEC LAYER 3 TYPE 2 - LATERAL DRAINAGE LAYER MATERIAL TEXTURE THICKNESS POROSITY FIELD CAPACITY WILTING POINT INITIAL SOIL WATER CONTENT EFFECTIVE SAT. HYD. COND. SLOPE DRAINAGE LENGTH NUMBER 1 6.00 INCHES 0.4170 VOL/VOL 0.0450 VOL/VOL 0.0180 VOL/VOL 0.0717 VOL/VOL 0.999999978000E-02 2.64 PERCENT 845.0 FEET CM/SEC LAYER 4 TYPE 3 - MATERIAL THICKNESS POROSITY FIELD CAPACITY WILTING POINT INITIAL SOIL WATER CONTENT EFFECTIVE SAT. HYD. COND. BARRIER SOIL LINER TEXTURE NUMBER 0 24.00 INCHES 0.4450 VOL/VOL 0.3930 VOL/VOL 0.2770 VOL/VOL 0.4450 VOL/VOL 0.100000001000E-06 CM/SEC GENERAL DESIGN AND EVAPORATIVE ZONE DATA NOTE: SCS RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER WAS USER -SPECIFIED. SCS RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER FRACTION OF AREA ALLOWING RUNOFF AREA PROJECTED ON HORIZONTAL PLANE EVAPORATIVE ZONE DEPTH INITIAL WATER IN EVAPORATIVE ZONE UPPER LIMIT OF EVAPORATIVE STORAGE LOWER LIMIT OF EVAPORATIVE STORAGE INITIAL SNOW WATER INITIAL WATER IN LAYER MATERIALS TOTAL INITIAL WATER TOTAL SUBSURFACE INFLOW 85.00 100.0 1.000 6.0 1.103 2.358 0.798 0.000 327.574 327.574 0.00 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION AND WEATHER DATA NOTE: EVAPOTRANSPIRATION DATA WAS OBTAINED FROM CHEYENNE WYOMING STATION LATITUDE MAXIMUM LEAF AREA INDEX START OF GROWING SEASON (JULIAN DATE) END OF GROWING SEASON (JULIAN DATE) EVAPORATIVE ZONE DEPTH AVERAGE ANNUAL WIND SPEED AVERAGE 1ST QUARTER RELATIVE HUMIDITY AVERAGE 2ND QUARTER RELATIVE HUMIDITY alb PERCENT ACRES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES/YEAR 40.59 DEGREES 0.00 138 273 6.0 INCHES 7.50 MPH 52.00 0 54.00 0 AVERAGE 3RD QUARTER RELATIVE HUMIDITY AVERAGE 4TH QUARTER RELATIVE HUMIDITY 50.00 o 51.00 N OTE: PRECIPITATION DATA WAS SYNTHETICALLY GENERATED USING COEFFICIENTS FOR CHEYENNE WYOMING JAN/JUL 0.41 1.87 NORMAL MEAN MONTHLY PRECIPITATION (INCHES) FEB/AUG 0.40 1.39 MAR/SEP 0.97 1.06 APR/OCT 1.24 0.68 MAY/NOV 2.39 0.53 JUN/ DEC N OTE: TEMPERATURE DATA WAS SYNTHETICALLY GENERATED USING COEFFICIENTS FOR CHEYENNE WYOMING JAN/JUL 26.10 68.90 NORMAL MEAN MONTHLY TEMPERATURE (DEGREES FAHRENHEIT) FEB/AUG 29.30 66.80 MAR/SEP 32.10 57.90 APR/OCT 41.80 47.50 MAY/N fV 52.20 34.80 2.00 0.37 JUN/DEC 62.00 29.30 N OTE: SOLAR RADIATION DATA WAS SYNTHETICALLY GENERATED USING COEFFICIENTS FOR CHEYENNE WYOMING AND STATION LATITUDE = 40.59 DEGREES * ************************************************************************ * ***** JUN/DEC PRECIPITATION 0.93 MONTHLY TOTALS (IN INCHES) FOR YEAR 1 JAN/JUL FEB/AUG MAR/SEP APR/OCT MAY/NOV 0.08 0.07 1.13 0.47 1.97 2.49 0.96 1.72 0.96 0.39 0.11 RUNOFF }} 0.000 0.000 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 0.513 0.201 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED 0.0920 FROM LAYER 3 0.0399 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH 0.1094 LAYER 4 0.1086 0.000 0.000 0.117 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.147 0.242 0.756 0.499 1.378 2.292 0.802 2.007 0.299 0.494 0.0146 0.0013 0.0000 0.0000 0.0111 0.1079 0.0880 0.0778 0.0598 0.0501 0.1066 0.0485 0.0015 0.0013 0.0460 0.1141 0.1125 0.1083 0.11:2 0.1061 MONTHLY SUMMARIES FOR DAILY HEADS (INCHES) AVERAGE DAILY HEAD ON 1.732 TOP OF LAYER 4 0.727 STD. DEVIATION OF DAILY 0.349 HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 0.117 0.265 1.966 0.095 0.209 0.026 1.604 0.036 0.156 0.000 1.465 0.000 0.113 0.000 1.089 0.000 0.134 0.203 0.944 0.289 0.051 * ****************-***********-***********-************* ****-****************-* * ***** * *******************-********-********-***-*****************-****-************* * ***** ANNUAL TOTALS FOR YEAR 1 INCHES CU. FEET PERCENT PRECIPITATION 11.28 100.00 RUNOFF 1.03 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 85.37 DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 4.81 PERC./LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 8.63 AVG. HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 CHANGE IN WATER STORAGE 0.16 SOIL WATER AT START OF YEAR SOIL WATER AT END OF YEAR SNOW WATER AT START OF YEAR 0.00 SNOW WATER AT END OF YEAR 0.00 ANNUAL WATER BUDGET BALANCE 0.00 0.117 9.630 0.5424 0.973143 0.8351 40946.406 423.764 34956.262 1968.887 3532.509 0.018 64.916 327.574 327.591 0.000 1189092.250 1189157.120 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.066 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * ************************************************************************ * ***** AVERAGE MONTHLY VALUES IN INCHES FOR YEARS 1 THROUGH 1 JAN/JUL FEB/AUG MAR/SEP APR/OCT MAY/NOV JUN/DEC PRECIPITATION TOTALS 0.93 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.08 2.49 STD, DEVIATIONS 0.00 RUNOFF TOTALS 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.000 0.07 1.13 0.96 1.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.117 0.47 1.97 0.96 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 STD. DEVIATIONS 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION TOTALS 0.513 0.201 0.000 0.147 2.292 0.000 0.000 0.242 0.756 0.802 2.007 0.000 0.000 0.499 1.378 0.299 0.494 STD. DEVIATIONS 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 TOTALS 0.0920 0.0399 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0146 0.0013 0.0000 0.0000 0.0111 0.1079 0.0880 0.0778 0.0598 0.0501 STD. DEVIATIONS 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 TOTALS 0.1094 0.1086 STD. DEVIATIONS 0.0000 0.0000 0.1066 0.0485 0.0015 0.0013 0.0460 0.1141 0.1125 0.1083 0.1102 0.1061 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 AVERAGES OF MONTHLY AVERAGED DAILY HEADS (INCHES) DAILY AVERAGE HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 AVERAGES 1.7317 0.7271 STD. DEVIATIONS 0.0000 0.0000 0.2654 0.0259 0.0000 0.0000 0.2028 1.9664 1.6043 1.4645 1.0892 0.9440 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * ************************************************************************ * ***** 1 AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTALS & (STD. DEVIATIONS) FOR YEARS 1 THROUGH PERCENT PRECIPITATION 100.00 RUNOFF 1.035 INCHES 11.28 0.000) 0.117 ( 0.0000) CU. FEET 40946.4 423.76 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 85.371 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED 4.80845 FROM. LAYER 3 9.630 ( 0.0000) 34956.26 0.54239 ( 0.00000) 1968.887 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH 0.97314 ( 0.00000) 3532.509 8.62715 LAYER 4 AVERAGE HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 CHANGE IN WATER STORAGE 0.159 0.835 ( 0.000) 0.018 ( 0.0000) 64.92 ************************************************************************* ****** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * PEAK DAILY VALUES FOR YEARS PRECIPITATION RUNOFF DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM 14.53715 LAYER 3 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 13.51158 AVERAGE HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 MAXIMUM HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 LOCATION OF MAXIMUM HEAD IN LAYER 3 (DISTANCE FROM DRAIN) SNOW WATER MAXIMUM VEG. MINIMUM VEG. 1 THROUGH 1 (INCHES) 0.64 0.117 0.00400 0.003722 2.263 4.284 44.4 FEET (CU. FT.) 2323.200 423.7645 0.41 1476.5393 SOIL WATER (VOL/VOL) 0.2614 SOIL WATER (VOL/VOL) 0.1330 *** Maximum heads are computed using McEnroe's equations. Reference: Maximum Saturated Depth over Landfill Liner by Bruce M. McEnroe, University of Kansas ASCE Journal of Environmental Engineering Vol. 119, No. 2, March 1993, pp. 262-270. *** * ************************************************************************ * **** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * **** FINAL WATER STORAGE AT END OF YEAR 1 LAYER 1 2 3 4 SNOW WATER (INCHES) (VOL/VOL) 1.0839 315.3599 0.4677 10.6800 0.000 0.1806 0.2920 0.0779 0.4450 * ************************************************************************ * **** * *********-***************-*****************-***-************-**************** * **** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * **** * *** ********************************************************************* HYDROLOGIC EVALUATION OF LANDFILL PERFORMANCE HELP MODEL VERSION 3.07 (1 NOVEMBER 1997) DEVELOPED BY ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY USAF WATERWAYS EXPERIMENT STATION FOR USEPA RISK REDUCTION ENGINEERING LABORATORY * ************************************************************************ * **** * ************************************************************************ * **** PRECIPITATION DATA FILE: TEMPERATURE DATA FILE: SOLAR RADIATION DATA FILE: EVAPOTRANSPIRATION DATA: SOIL AND DESIGN DATA FILE: OUTPUT DATA FILE: TIME: 11:54 C:\NWPREC1.D4 C:\NWTEMPl.D7 C:\NWRAD1.D13 C:\NWEVAP.D11 C:\NW SD 2C.D10 D10 C:\NW OUT2C.OUT DATE: 11/16/2016 * ************************************************************************ * **** TITLE: NORTH WELD LANDFILL SCENARIO 2: 60'WASTE WITH DAILY COVER THICKNESS POROSITY FIELD CAPACITY WILTING POINT INITIAL SOIL WATER CONTENT EFFECTIVE SAT. HYD. COND. THICKNESS POROSITY FIELD CAPACITY WILTING POINT INITIAL SOIL WATER CONTENT EFFECTIVE SAT. HYD. COND. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * ***** NOTE: INITIAL MOISTURE CONTENT OF THE LAYERS AND SNOW WATER WERE COMPUTED AS NEARLY STEADY-STATE VALUES BY THE PROGRAM. LAYER 1 TYPE 1 - VERTICAL PERCOLATION LAYER MATERIAL TEXTURE NUMBER 0 6.00 INCHES 0.3930 VOL/VOL 0.2990 VOL/VOL 0.1330 VOL/VOL 0.1839 VOL/VOL 0.119999997000E-03 CM/SEC LAYER 2 TYPE 1 - VERTICAL PERCOLATION LAYER MATERIAL TEXTURE NUMBER 18 720.00 INCHES 0.6710 VOL/VOL 0.2920 VOL/VOL 0.0770 VOL/VOL 0.2920 VOL/VOL 0.100000005000E-02 CM/SEC LAYER 3 TYPE 2 - LATERAL DRAINAGE LAYER MATERIAL TEXTURE THICKNESS POROSITY FIELD CAPACITY WILTING POINT INITIAL SOIL WATER CONTENT EFFECTIVE SAT. HYD. COND. SLOPE DRAINAGE LENGTH NUMBER 1 6.00 INCHES 0.4170 VOL/VOL 0.0450 VOL/VOL 0.0180 VOL/VOL 0.0717 VOL/VOL 0.999999978000E-02 2.64 PERCENT 845.0 FEET CM/SEC LAYER 4 TYPE 3 - MATERIAL THICKNESS POROSITY FIELD CAPACITY WILTING POINT INITIAL SOIL WATER CONTENT EFFECTIVE SAT. HYD. COND. BARRIER SOIL LINER TEXTURE NUMBER 0 24.00 INCHES 0.4450 VOL/VOL 0.3930 VOL/VOL 0.2770 VOL/VOL 0.4450 VOL/VOL 0.100000001000E-06 CM/SEC GENERAL DESIGN AND EVAPORATIVE ZONE DATA NOTE: SCS RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER WAS USER -SPECIFIED. SCS RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER FRACTION OF AREA ALLOWING RUNOFF AREA PROJECTED ON HORIZONTAL PLANE EVAPORATIVE ZONE DEPTH INITIAL WATER IN EVAPORATIVE ZONE UPPER LIMIT OF EVAPORATIVE STORAGE LOWER LIMIT OF EVAPORATIVE STORAGE INITIAL SNOW WATER INITIAL WATER IN LAYER MATERIALS TOTAL INITIAL WATER TOTAL SUBSURFACE INFLOW 85.00 100.0 1.000 6.0 1.103 2.358 0.798 0.000 222.454 222.454 0.00 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION AND WEATHER DATA NOTE: EVAPOTRANSPIRATION DATA WAS OBTAINED FROM CHEYENNE WYOMING STATION LATITUDE MAXIMUM LEAF AREA INDEX START OF GROWING SEASON (JULIAN DATE) END OF GROWING SEASON (JULIAN DATE) EVAPORATIVE ZONE DEPTH AVERAGE ANNUAL WIND SPEED AVERAGE 1ST QUARTER RELATIVE HUMIDITY AVERAGE 2ND QUARTER RELATIVE HUMIDITY alb PERCENT ACRES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES/YEAR 40.59 DEGREES 0.00 138 273 6.0 INCHES 7.50 MPH 52.00 0 54.00 0 AVERAGE 3RD QUARTER RELATIVE HUMIDITY AVERAGE 4TH QUARTER RELATIVE HUMIDITY 50.00 o 51.00 N OTE: PRECIPITATION DATA WAS SYNTHETICALLY GENERATED USING COEFFICIENTS FOR CHEYENNE WYOMING JAN/JUL 0.41 1.87 NORMAL MEAN MONTHLY PRECIPITATION (INCHES) FEB/AUG 0.40 1.39 MAR/SEP 0.97 1.06 APR/OCT 1.24 0.68 MAY/NOV 2.39 0.53 JUN/ DEC N OTE: TEMPERATURE DATA WAS SYNTHETICALLY GENERATED USING COEFFICIENTS FOR CHEYENNE WYOMING JAN/JUL 26.10 68.90 NORMAL MEAN MONTHLY TEMPERATURE (DEGREES FAHRENHEIT) FEB/AUG 29.30 66.80 MAR/SEP 32.10 57.90 APR/OCT 41.80 47.50 MAY/N fV 52.20 34.80 2.00 0.37 JUN/DEC 62.00 29.30 N OTE: SOLAR RADIATION DATA WAS SYNTHETICALLY GENERATED USING COEFFICIENTS FOR CHEYENNE WYOMING AND STATION LATITUDE = 40.59 DEGREES * ************************************************************************ * ***** JUN/DEC PRECIPITATION 0.93 MONTHLY TOTALS (IN INCHES) FOR YEAR 1 JAN/JUL FEB/AUG MAR/SEP APR/OCT MAY/NOV 0.08 0.07 1.13 0.47 1.97 2.49 0.96 1.72 0.96 0.39 0.11 RUNOFF }} 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.117 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.000 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 0.147 0.242 0.756 0.499 1.378 0.513 0.201 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED 0.0919 FROM LAYER 3 0.0399 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH 0.1094 LAYER 4 0.1086 2.292 0.802 2.007 0.299 0.494 0.0146 0.0013 0.0000 0.0000 0.0111 0.1078 0.0879 0.0777 0.0597 0.0501 0.1066 0.0485 0.0015 0.0013 0.0468 0.1141 0.1125 0.1083 0.11:2 0.1061 MONTHLY SUMMARIES FOR DAILY HEADS (INCHES) AVERAGE DAILY HEAD ON 1.730 TOP OF LAYER 4 0.726 STD. DEVIATION OF DAILY 0.349 HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 0.117 0.265 1.965 0.095 0.209 0.026 1.603 0.036 0.156 0.000 1.463 0.000 0.113 0.000 1.088 0.000 0.134 0.202 0.943 0.288 0.051 * ****************-***********-***********-************* ****-****************-* * ***** * *******************-********-********-***-*****************-****-************* * ***** ANNUAL TOTALS FOR YEAR 1 INCHES CU. FEET PERCENT PRECIPITATION 11.28 40946.406 100.00 RUNOFF 0.117 423.764 1.03 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 9.630 34956.262 85.37 DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 0.5419 1966.939 4.80 PERC, /LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 0.973917 3535. 319 8.63 AVG. HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 0.8343 CHANGE IN WATER STORAGE 0.16 SOIL WATER AT START OF YEAR SOIL WATER AT END OF YEAR SNOW WATER AT START OF YEAR 0.00 SNOW WATER AT END OF YEAR 0.00 ANNUAL WATER BUDGET BALANCE 0.00 0.018 64.141 222.454 222.471 0.000 807506.500 807570.625 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0000 -0.021 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * ************************************************************************ * ***** AVERAGE MONTHLY VALUES IN INCHES FOR YEARS 1 THROUGH 1 JAN/JUL FEB/AUG MAR/SEP APR/OCT MAY/NOV JUN/DEC PRECIPITATION TOTALS 0.93 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.08 2.49 STD, DEVIATIONS 0.00 RUNOFF TOTALS 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.000 0.07 1.13 0.96 1.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.117 0.47 1.97 0.96 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 STD. DEVIATIONS 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION TOTALS 0.513 0.201 0.000 0.147 2.292 0.000 0.000 0.242 0.756 0.802 2.007 0.000 0.000 0.499 1.378 0.299 0.494 STD. DEVIATIONS 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 TOTALS 0.0919 0.0399 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0146 0.0013 0.0000 0.0000 0.0111 0.1078 0.0879 0.0777 0.0597 0.0501 STD. DEVIATIONS 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 TOTALS 0.1094 0.1086 STD. DEVIATIONS 0.0000 0.0000 0.1066 0.0485 0.0015 0.0013 0.0468 0.1141 0.1125 0.1083 0.1102 0.1061 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 AVERAGES OF MONTHLY AVERAGED DAILY HEADS (INCHES) DAILY AVERAGE HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 AVERAGES 1.7303 0.7263 STD. DEVIATIONS 0.0000 0.0000 0.2653 0.0258 0.0000 0.0000 0.2020 1.9646 1.6027 1.4633 1.0880 0.9430 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * ************************************************************************ * ***** 1 AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTALS & (STD. DEVIATIONS) FOR YEARS 1 THROUGH PERCENT PRECIPITATION 100.00 RUNOFF 1.035 INCHES 11.28 0.000) 0.117 ( 0.0000) CU. FEET 40946.4 423.76 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 85.371 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED 4.80369 FROM. LAYER 3 9.630 ( 0.0000) 34956.26 0.54186 ( 0.00000) 1966.939 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH 0.97392 ( 0.00000) 3535.319 8.63401 LAYER 4 AVERAGE HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 CHANGE IN WATER STORAGE 0.157 0.834 ( 0.000) 0.018 ( 0.0000) 64.14 ************************************************************************* ****** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * PEAK DAILY VALUES FOR YEARS 1 THROUGH 1 (INCHES) (CU. FT.) PRECIPITATION RUNOFF DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 14.52689 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 13.51075 AVERAGE HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 0.64 0.117 0.00400 0.003722 2.261 MAXIMUM HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 4.281 LOCATION OF MAXIMUM HEAD IN LAYER 3 (DISTANCE FROM DRAIN) 44.4 FEET SNOW WATER 2323.200 423.7645 0.41 1476.5393 MAXIMUM VEG. SOIL WATER (VOL/VOL) 0.2614 MINIMUM VEG. SOIL WATER (VOL/VOL) 0.1330 *** Maximum heads are computed using McEnroe's equations. Reference: Maximum Saturated Depth over Landfill Liner by Bruce M. McEnroe, University of Kansas ASCE Journal of Environmental Engineering Vol. 119, No. 2, March 1993, pp. 262-270. *** * *****-********-********-****-********************-********-****-*************** * **** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * **** FINAL WATER STORAGE AT END OF YEAR 1 LAYER 1 2 3 4 SNOW WATER (INCHES) (VOL/VOL) 1.0839 210 .2399 0.4674 10.6800 0.000 0.1806 0.2920 0.0779 0.4450 * ************************************************************************ * **** * *********-***************-*****************-***-************-**************** * **** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * **** * *** ********************************************************************* HYDROLOGIC EVALUATION OF LANDFILL PERFORMANCE HELP MODEL VERSION 3.07 (1 NOVEMBER 1997) DEVELOPED BY ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY USAF WATERWAYS EXPERIMENT STATION FOR USEPA RISK REDUCTION ENGINEERING LABORATORY * ************************************************************************ * **** * ************************************************************************ * **** PRECIPITATION DATA FILE: TEMPERATURE DATA FILE: SOLAR RADIATION DATA FILE: EVAPOTRANSPIRATION DATA: SOIL AND DESIGN DATA FILE: OUTPUT DATA FILE: TIME: 11:55 C:\NWPREC1.D4 C:\NWTEMPl.D7 C:\NWRAD1.D13 C:\NWEVAP.D11 C:\NW SD 2D.D10 D10 C:\NW OUT2D.OUT DATE: 11/16/2016 * ************************************************************************ * **** TITLE: SLOPE NORTH WELD LANDFILL SCENARIO 2: 70 'WASTE WITH DC; 800' THICKNESS POROSITY FIELD CAPACITY WILTING POINT INITIAL SOIL WATER CONTENT EFFECTIVE SAT. HYD. COND. THICKNESS POROSITY FIELD CAPACITY WILTING POINT INITIAL SOIL WATER CONTENT EFFECTIVE SAT. HYD. COND. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * ***** NOTE: INITIAL MOISTURE CONTENT OF THE LAYERS AND SNOW WATER WERE COMPUTED AS NEARLY STEADY-STATE VALUES BY THE PROGRAM. LAYER 1 TYPE 1 - VERTICAL PERCOLATION LAYER MATERIAL TEXTURE NUMBER 0 6.00 INCHES 0.3930 VOL/VOL 0.2990 VOL/VOL 0.1330 VOL/VOL 0.1839 VOL/VOL 0.119999997000E-03 CM/SEC LAYER 2 TYPE 1 - VERTICAL PERCOLATION LAYER MATERIAL TEXTURE NUMBER 18 840.00 INCHES 0.6710 VOL/VOL 0.2920 VOL/VOL 0.0770 VOL/VOL 0.2920 VOL/VOL 0.100000005000E-02 CM/SEC LAYER 3 TYPE 2 - LATERAL DRAINAGE LAYER MATERIAL TEXTURE THICKNESS POROSITY FIELD CAPACITY WILTING POINT INITIAL SOIL WATER CONTENT EFFECTIVE SAT. HYD. COND. SLOPE DRAINAGE LENGTH NUMBER 1 6.00 INCHES 0.4170 VOL/VOL 0.0450 VOL/VOL 0.0180 VOL/VOL 0.0694 VOL/VOL 0.999999978000E-02 2.64 PERCENT 800.0 FEET CM/SEC LAYER 4 TYPE 3 - MATERIAL THICKNESS POROSITY FIELD CAPACITY WILTING POINT INITIAL SOIL WATER CONTENT EFFECTIVE SAT. HYD. COND. BARRIER SOIL LINER TEXTURE NUMBER 0 24.00 INCHES 0.4450 VOL/VOL 0.3930 VOL/VOL 0.2770 VOL/VOL 0.4450 VOL/VOL 0.100000001000E-06 CM/SEC GENERAL DESIGN AND EVAPORATIVE ZONE DATA NOTE: SCS RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER WAS USER -SPECIFIED. SCS RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER FRACTION OF AREA ALLOWING RUNOFF AREA PROJECTED ON HORIZONTAL PLANE EVAPORATIVE ZONE DEPTH INITIAL WATER IN EVAPORATIVE ZONE UPPER LIMIT OF EVAPORATIVE STORAGE LOWER LIMIT OF EVAPORATIVE STORAGE INITIAL SNOW WATER INITIAL WATER IN LAYER MATERIALS TOTAL INITIAL WATER TOTAL SUBSURFACE INFLOW 85.00 100.0 1.000 6.0 1.103 2.358 0.798 0.000 257.479 257.479 0.00 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION AND WEATHER DATA NOTE: EVAPOTRANSPIRATION DATA WAS OBTAINED FROM CHEYENNE WYOMING STATION LATITUDE MAXIMUM LEAF AREA INDEX START OF GROWING SEASON (JULIAN DATE) END OF GROWING SEASON (JULIAN DATE) EVAPORATIVE ZONE DEPTH AVERAGE ANNUAL WIND SPEED AVERAGE 1ST QUARTER RELATIVE HUMIDITY AVERAGE 2ND QUARTER RELATIVE HUMIDITY alb PERCENT ACRES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES/YEAR 40.59 DEGREES 0.00 138 273 6.0 INCHES 7.50 MPH 52.00 0 54.00 0 AVERAGE 3RD QUARTER RELATIVE HUMIDITY AVERAGE 4TH QUARTER RELATIVE HUMIDITY 50.00 o 51.00 N OTE: PRECIPITATION DATA WAS SYNTHETICALLY GENERATED USING COEFFICIENTS FOR CHEYENNE WYOMING JAN/JUL 0.41 1.87 NORMAL MEAN MONTHLY PRECIPITATION (INCHES) FEB/AUG 0.40 1.39 MAR/SEP 0.97 1.06 APR/OCT 1.24 0.68 MAY/NOV 2.39 0.53 JUN/ DEC N OTE: TEMPERATURE DATA WAS SYNTHETICALLY GENERATED USING COEFFICIENTS FOR CHEYENNE WYOMING JAN/JUL 26.10 68.90 NORMAL MEAN MONTHLY TEMPERATURE (DEGREES FAHRENHEIT) FEB/AUG 29.30 66.80 MAR/SEP 32.10 57.90 APR/OCT 41.80 47.50 MAY/N fV 52.20 34.80 2.00 0.37 JUN/DEC 62.00 29.30 N OTE: SOLAR RADIATION DATA WAS SYNTHETICALLY GENERATED USING COEFFICIENTS FOR CHEYENNE WYOMING AND STATION LATITUDE = 40.59 DEGREES * ************************************************************************ * ***** JUN/DEC PRECIPITATION 0.93 MONTHLY TOTALS (IN INCHES) FOR YEAR 1 JAN/JUL FEB/AUG MAR/SEP APR/OCT MAY/NOV 0.08 0.07 1.13 0.47 1.97 2.49 0.96 1.72 0.96 0.39 0.11 RUNOFF }} 0.000 0.000 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 0.513 0.201 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED 0.0966 FROM LAYER 3 0.0396 0.000 0.000 0.117 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.147 0.242 0.756 0.499 1.378 2.292 0.802 2.007 0.299 0.494 0.0133 0.0007 0.0000 0.0000 0.0117 0.1127 0.0911 0.0799 0.0606 0.0505 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH 0.1065 0.0364 0.0015 0.0013 0.0468 0.1094 LAYER 4 0.1140 0.1124 0.1081 0.1100 0.1059 0.1084 MONTHLY SUMMARIES FOR DAILY HEADS (INCHES) AVERAGE DAILY HEAD ON 1.722 TOP OF LAYER 4 0.683 STD. DEVIATION OF DAILY 0.347 HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 0.116 0.229 1.944 0.094 0.208 0.013 1.571 0.023 0.159 0.000 1.425 0.000 0.113 0.000 1.046 0.000 0.135 0.202 0.900 0.288 0.051 * ****************-***********-***********-************* ****-****************-* * ***** * *******************-********-********-***-*****************-****-************* * ***** ANNUAL TOTALS FOR YEAR 1 PERCENT PRECIPITATION 100.00 RUNOFF 1.03 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 85.37 DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 4.93 PERC./LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 8.52 AVG. HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 CHANGE IN WATER STORAGE 0.14 SOIL WATER AT START OF YEAR SOIL WATER AT END OF YEAR SNOW WATER AT START OF YEAR 0.00 SNOW WATER AT END OF YEAR 0.00 ANNUAL WATER BUDGET BALANCE 0.00 INCHES 11.28 0.117 9.630 0.5566 0.960 682 0.8113 0.016 257.479 257.496 0.000 0.000 0.0000 CU. FEET 40946.406 423.764 34956.262 2020.497 3487.275 58.491 934650.437 934708.937 0.000 0.000 0.114 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * ************************************************************************ * ***** AVERAGE MONTHLY VALUES IN INCHES FOR YEARS 1 THROUGH 1 JAN/JUL FEB/AUG MAR/SEP APR/OCT MAY/NOV JUN/DEC PRECIPITATION TOTALS 0.93 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.08 2.49 STD, DEVIATIONS 0.00 RUNOFF TOTALS 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.000 0.07 1.13 0.96 1.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.117 0.47 1.97 0.96 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 STD. DEVIATIONS 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION TOTALS 0.513 0.201 0.000 0.147 2.292 0.000 0.000 0.242 0.756 0.802 2.007 0.000 0.000 0.499 1.378 0.299 0.494 STD. DEVIATIONS 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 TOTALS 0.0966 0.0396 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0133 0.0007 0.0000 0.0000 0.0117 0.1127 0.0911 0.0799 0.0606 0.0505 STD. DEVIATIONS 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 TOTALS 0.1094 0.1084 STD. DEVIATIONS 0.0000 0.0000 0.1065 0.1140 0.0000 0.0000 0.0364 0.0015 0.0013 0.0468 0.1124 0.1081 0.1100 0.1059 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 AVERAGES OF MONTHLY AVERAGED DAILY HEADS (INCHES) DAILY AVERAGE HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 AVERAGES 1.7223 0.6834 STD. DEVIATIONS 0.0000 0.0000 0.2290 1.9441 0.0000 0.0000 0.0130 0.0000 0.0000 0.2017 1.5712 1.4252 1.0460 0.9001 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * ************************************************************************ * ***** 1 AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTALS & (STD. DEVIATIONS) FOR YEARS 1 THROUGH PERCENT PRECIPITATION 100.00 RUNOFF 1.035 INCHES 11.28 0.000) 0.117 ( 0.0000) CU. FEET 40946.4 423.76 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 85.371 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED 4.93449 FROM LAYER 3 9.630 ( 0.0000) 34956.26 0.55661 ( 0.00000) 2020.497 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH 0.96068 ( 0.00000) 3487.275 8.51668 LAYER 4 AVERAGE HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 CHANGE IN WATER STORAGE 0.143 0.811 ( 0.000) 0.016 ( 0.0000) 58.49 ************************************************************************* ****** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * PEAK DAILY VALUES FOR YEARS 1 THROUGH 1 (INCHES) (CU. FT.) PRECIPITATION RUNOFF DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 15.22011 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 13.50136 AVERAGE HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 0.64 0.117 0.00419 0.003719 2.243 MAXIMUM HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 4.239 LOCATION OF MAXIMUM HEAD IN LAYER 3 (DISTANCE FROM DRAIN) 43.4 FEET SNOW WATER 2323.200 423.7645 0.41 1476.5393 MAXIMUM VEG. SOIL WATER (VOL/VOL) 0.2614 MINIMUM VEG. SOIL WATER (VOL/VOL) 0.1330 *** Maximum heads are computed using McEnroe's equations. Reference: Maximum Saturated Depth over Landfill Liner by Bruce M. McEnroe, University of Kansas ASCE Journal of Environmental Engineering Vol. 119, No. 2, March 1993, pp. 262-270. *** * *****-********-********-****-********************-********-****-*************** * **** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * **** FINAL WATER STORAGE AT END OF YEAR 1 LAYER 1 2 3 4 SNOW WATER (INCHES) (VOL/VOL) 1.0839 245■2799 0.4518 10.6800 0.000 0.1806 0.2920 0.0753 0.4450 * ************************************************************************ * **** * *********-***************-*****************-***-************-**************** * **** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * **** * *** ********************************************************************* HYDROLOGIC EVALUATION OF LANDFILL PERFORMANCE HELP MODEL VERSION 3.07 (1 NOVEMBER 1997) DEVELOPED BY ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY USAF WATERWAYS EXPERIMENT STATION FOR USEPA RISK REDUCTION ENGINEERING LABORATORY * ************************************************************************ * **** * ************************************************************************ * **** PRECIPITATION DATA FILE: TEMPERATURE DATA FILE: SOLAR RADIATION DATA FILE: EVAPOTRANSPIRATION DATA: SOIL AND DESIGN DATA FILE: OUTPUT DATA FILE: TIME: 11:56 C:\NWPREC1.D4 C:\NWTEMPl.D7 C:\NWRAD1.D13 C:\NWEVAP.D11 C:\NW SD 2E.D10 D10 C:\NW OUT2E.OUT DATE: 11/16/2016 * ************************************************************************ * **** TITLE: SLOPE NORTH WELD LANDFILL SCENARIO 2: 70'WASTE 'WASTE WITH DC; 700' THICKNESS POROSITY FIELD CAPACITY WILTING POINT INITIAL SOIL WATER CONTENT EFFECTIVE SAT. HYD. COND. THICKNESS POROSITY FIELD CAPACITY WILTING POINT INITIAL SOIL WATER CONTENT EFFECTIVE SAT. HYD. COND. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * ***** NOTE: INITIAL MOISTURE CONTENT OF THE LAYERS AND SNOW WATER WERE COMPUTED AS NEARLY STEADY-STATE VALUES BY THE PROGRAM. LAYER 1 TYPE 1 - VERTICAL PERCOLATION LAYER MATERIAL TEXTURE NUMBER 0 6.00 INCHES 0.3930 VOL/VOL 0.2990 VOL/VOL 0.1330 VOL/VOL 0.1839 VOL/VOL 0.119999997000E-03 CM/SEC LAYER 2 TYPE 1 - VERTICAL PERCOLATION LAYER MATERIAL TEXTURE NUMBER 18 840.00 INCHES 0.6710 VOL/VOL 0.2920 VOL/VOL 0.0770 VOL/VOL 0.2920 VOL/VOL 0.100000005000E-02 CM/SEC LAYER 3 TYPE 2 - LATERAL DRAINAGE LAYER MATERIAL TEXTURE THICKNESS POROSITY FIELD CAPACITY WILTING POINT INITIAL SOIL WATER CONTENT EFFECTIVE SAT. HYD. COND. SLOPE DRAINAGE LENGTH NUMBER 1 6.00 INCHES 0.4170 VOL/VOL 0.0450 VOL/VOL 0.0180 VOL/VOL 0.0637 VOL/VOL 0.999999978000E-02 2.64 PERCENT 700.0 FEET CM/SEC LAYER 4 TYPE 3 - MATERIAL THICKNESS POROSITY FIELD CAPACITY WILTING POINT INITIAL SOIL WATER CONTENT EFFECTIVE SAT. HYD. COND. BARRIER SOIL LINER TEXTURE NUMBER 0 24.00 INCHES 0.4450 VOL/VOL 0.3930 VOL/VOL 0.2770 VOL/VOL 0.4450 VOL/VOL 0.100000001000E-06 CM/SEC GENERAL DESIGN AND EVAPORATIVE ZONE DATA NOTE: SCS RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER WAS USER -SPECIFIED. SCS RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER FRACTION OF AREA ALLOWING RUNOFF AREA PROJECTED ON HORIZONTAL PLANE EVAPORATIVE ZONE DEPTH INITIAL WATER IN EVAPORATIVE ZONE UPPER LIMIT OF EVAPORATIVE STORAGE LOWER LIMIT OF EVAPORATIVE STORAGE INITIAL SNOW WATER INITIAL WATER IN LAYER MATERIALS TOTAL INITIAL WATER TOTAL SUBSURFACE INFLOW 85.00 100.0 1.000 6.0 1.103 2.358 0.798 0.000 257.445 257.445 0.00 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION AND WEATHER DATA NOTE: EVAPOTRANSPIRATION DATA WAS OBTAINED FROM CHEYENNE WYOMING STATION LATITUDE MAXIMUM LEAF AREA INDEX START OF GROWING SEASON (JULIAN DATE) END OF GROWING SEASON (JULIAN DATE) EVAPORATIVE ZONE DEPTH AVERAGE ANNUAL WIND SPEED AVERAGE 1ST QUARTER RELATIVE HUMIDITY AVERAGE 2ND QUARTER RELATIVE HUMIDITY alb PERCENT ACRES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES/YEAR 40.59 DEGREES 0.00 138 273 6.0 INCHES 7.50 MPH 52.00 0 54.00 0 AVERAGE 3RD QUARTER RELATIVE HUMIDITY AVERAGE 4TH QUARTER RELATIVE HUMIDITY 50.00 o 51.00 N OTE: PRECIPITATION DATA WAS SYNTHETICALLY GENERATED USING COEFFICIENTS FOR CHEYENNE WYOMING JAN/JUL 0.41 1.87 NORMAL MEAN MONTHLY PRECIPITATION (INCHES) FEB/AUG 0.40 1.39 MAR/SEP 0.97 1.06 APR/OCT 1.24 0.68 MAY/NOV 2.39 0.53 JUN/ DEC N OTE: TEMPERATURE DATA WAS SYNTHETICALLY GENERATED USING COEFFICIENTS FOR CHEYENNE WYOMING JAN/JUL 26.10 68.90 NORMAL MEAN MONTHLY TEMPERATURE (DEGREES FAHRENHEIT) FEB/AUG 29.30 66.80 MAR/SEP 32.10 57.90 APR/OCT 41.80 47.50 MAY/N fV 52.20 34.80 2.00 0.37 JUN/DEC 62.00 29.30 N OTE: SOLAR RADIATION DATA WAS SYNTHETICALLY GENERATED USING COEFFICIENTS FOR CHEYENNE WYOMING AND STATION LATITUDE = 40.59 DEGREES * ************************************************************************ * ***** JUN/DEC PRECIPITATION 0.93 MONTHLY TOTALS (IN INCHES) FOR YEAR 1 JAN/JUL FEB/AUG MAR/SEP APR/OCT MAY/NOV 0.08 0.07 1.13 0.47 1.97 2.49 0.96 1.72 0.96 0.39 0.11 RUNOFF }} 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.117 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.000 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 0.147 0.242 0.756 0.499 1.378 0.513 0.201 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED 0.1091 FROM LAYER 3 0.0383 2.292 0.802 2.007 0.299 0.494 0.0094 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0133 0.1252 0.0987 0.0851 0.0623 0.0509 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH 0.1061 0.0072 0.0015 0.0013 0.0468 0.1093 LAYER 4 0,1138 0.1120 0.1077 0.1096 0.1054 0.1080 MONTHLY SUMMARIES FOR DAILY HEADS (INCHES) AVERAGE DAILY HEAD ON 1.702 TOP OF LAYER 4 0.579 STD. DEVIATION OF DAILY 0.344 HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 0.115 0.143 1.890 0.091 0.204 0.000 1.490 0.001 0.164 0.000 1.328 0.000 0.114 0.000 0.201 0.941 0.794 0.000 0.287 0.136 0.051 * ****************-***********-***********-************* ****-****************-* * ***** * *******************-********-********-***-*****************-****-************* * ***** ANNUAL TOTALS FOR YEAR 1 PERCENT PRECIPITATION 100.00 RUNOFF 1.03 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 85.37 DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 5.25 PERC./LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 8.23 AVG. HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 CHANGE IN WATER STORAGE 0.11 SOIL WATER AT START OF YEAR SOIL WATER AT END OF YEAR SNOW WATER AT START OF YEAR 0.00 SNOW WATER AT END OF YEAR 0.00 ANNUAL WATER BUDGET BALANCE 0.00 INCHES 11.28 0.117 9.630 0.5924 0.928628 0.7556 0.012 257.445 257.458 0.000 0.000 0.0000 CU. FEET 40946.406 423.764 34956.262 2150.280 3370.921 45.087 934526.812 934571.875 0.000 0.000 0.091 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * ************************************************************************ * ***** AVERAGE MONTHLY VALUES IN INCHES FOR YEARS 1 THROUGH 1 JAN/JUL FEB/AUG MAR/SEP APR/OCT MAY/NOV JUN/DEC PRECIPITATION TOTALS 0.93 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.08 2.49 STD, DEVIATIONS 0.00 RUNOFF TOTALS 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.000 0.07 1.13 0.96 1.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.117 0.47 1.97 0.96 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 STD. DEVIATIONS 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION TOTALS 0.513 0.201 0.000 0.147 2.292 0.000 0.000 0.242 0.756 0.802 2.007 0.000 0.000 0.499 1.378 0.299 0.494 STD. DEVIATIONS 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 TOTALS 0.1091 0.0383 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0094 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0133 0.1252 0.0987 0.0851 0.0623 0.0509 STD. DEVIATIONS 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 TOTALS 0.1093 0.1080 STD. DEVIATIONS 0.0000 0.0000 0.1061 0.0072 0.0015 0.0013 0.0468 0.1138 0.1120 0.1077 0.1096 0.1054 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 AVERAGES OF MONTHLY AVERAGED DAILY HEADS (INCHES) DAILY AVERAGE HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 AVERAGES 1.7016 0.5789 STD. DEVIATIONS 0.0000 0.0000 0.1426 0.0004 0.0000 0.0000 0.2010 1.8900 1.4896 1.3283 0.9405 0.7938 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * ************************************************************************ * ***** 1 AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTALS & (STD. DEVIATIONS) FOR YEARS 1 THROUGH PERCENT PRECIPITATION 100.00 RUNOFF 1.035 INCHES 11.28 0.000) 0.117 ( 0.0000) CU. FEET 40946.4 423.76 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 85.371 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED 5.25145 FROM LAYER 3 9.630 ( 0.0000) 34956.26 0.59236 ( 0.00000) 2150.280 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH 0.92863 ( 0.00000) 3370.921 8.23252 LAYER 4 AVERAGE HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 CHANGE IN WATER STORAGE 0.110 0.756 ( 0.000) 0.012 ( 0.0000) 45.09 ************************************************************************* ****** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * PEAK DAILY VALUES FOR YEARS PRECIPITATION RUNOFF DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM 17.02342 LAYER 3 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 13.47675 AVERAGE HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 MAXIMUM HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 LOCATION OF MAXIMUM HEAD IN LAYER 3 (DISTANCE FROM DRAIN) SNOW WATER MAXIMUM VEG MINIMUM VEG 1 THROUGH 1 (INCHES) 0.64 0.117 0.00469 0.003713 2.195 4.129 41.2 FEET (CU. FT.) 2323.200 423.7645 0.41 1476.5393 . SOIL WATER (VOL/VOL) 0.2614 . SOIL WATER (VOL/VOL) 0.1330 *** Maximum heads are computed using McEnroe's equations. Reference: Maximum Saturated Depth over Landfill Liner by Bruce M. McEnroe, University of Kansas ASCE Journal of Environmental Engineering Vol. 119, No. 2, March 1993, pp. 262-270. *** * *****-********-********-****-********************-********-****-*************** * **** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * **** FINAL WATER STORAGE AT END OF YEAR 1 LAYER 1 2 3 4 SNOW WATER (INCHES) (VOL/VOL) 1.0839 245.2799 0.4140 10.6800 0.000 0.1806 0.2920 0.0690 0.4450 * ************************************************************************ * **** * *********-***************-*****************-***-************-**************** * **** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * **** * *** ********************************************************************* HYDROLOGIC EVALUATION OF LANDFILL PERFORMANCE HELP MODEL VERSION 3.07 (1 NOVEMBER 1997) DEVELOPED BY ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY USAF WATERWAYS EXPERIMENT STATION FOR USEPA RISK REDUCTION ENGINEERING LABORATORY * ************************************************************************ * **** * ************************************************************************ * **** PRECIPITATION DATA FILE: TEMPERATURE DATA FILE: SOLAR RADIATION DATA FILE: EVAPOTRANSPIRATION DATA: SOIL AND DESIGN DATA FILE: OUTPUT DATA FILE: TIME: 11:56 C:\NWPREC1.D4 C:\NWTEMPl.D7 C:\NWRAD1.D13 C:\NWEVAP.D11 C:\NW SD 2F.D10 D10 C:\NW OUT2F.OUT DATE: 11/16/2016 * ************************************************************************ * **** TITLE: SLOPE NORTH WELD LANDFILL SCENARIO 2: 70 'WASTE WITH DC; 500' THICKNESS POROSITY FIELD CAPACITY WILTING POINT INITIAL SOIL WATER CONTENT EFFECTIVE SAT. HYD. COND. THICKNESS POROSITY FIELD CAPACITY WILTING POINT INITIAL SOIL WATER CONTENT EFFECTIVE SAT. HYD. COND. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * ***** NOTE: INITIAL MOISTURE CONTENT OF THE LAYERS AND SNOW WATER WERE COMPUTED AS NEARLY STEADY-STATE VALUES BY THE PROGRAM. LAYER 1 TYPE 1 - VERTICAL PERCOLATION LAYER MATERIAL TEXTURE NUMBER 0 6.00 INCHES 0.3930 VOL/VOL 0.2990 VOL/VOL 0.1330 VOL/VOL 0.1839 VOL/VOL 0.119999997000E-03 CM/SEC LAYER 2 TYPE 1 - VERTICAL PERCOLATION LAYER MATERIAL TEXTURE NUMBER 18 840.00 INCHES 0.6710 VOL/VOL 0.2920 VOL/VOL 0.0770 VOL/VOL 0.2920 VOL/VOL 0.100000005000E-02 CM/SEC LAYER 3 TYPE 2 - LATERAL DRAINAGE LAYER MATERIAL TEXTURE THICKNESS POROSITY FIELD CAPACITY WILTING POINT INITIAL SOIL WATER CONTENT EFFECTIVE SAT. HYD. COND. SLOPE DRAINAGE LENGTH NUMBER 1 6.00 INCHES 0.4170 VOL/VOL 0.0450 VOL/VOL 0.0180 VOL/VOL 0.0506 VOL/VOL 0.999999978000E-02 2.64 PERCENT 500.0 FEET CM/SEC LAYER 4 TYPE 3 - MATERIAL THICKNESS POROSITY FIELD CAPACITY WILTING POINT INITIAL SOIL WATER CONTENT EFFECTIVE SAT. HYD. COND. BARRIER SOIL LINER TEXTURE NUMBER 0 24.00 INCHES 0.4450 VOL/VOL 0.3930 VOL/VOL 0.2770 VOL/VOL 0.4450 VOL/VOL 0.100000001000E-06 CM/SEC GENERAL DESIGN AND EVAPORATIVE ZONE DATA NOTE: SCS RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER WAS USER -SPECIFIED. SCS RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER FRACTION OF AREA ALLOWING RUNOFF AREA PROJECTED ON HORIZONTAL PLANE EVAPORATIVE ZONE DEPTH INITIAL WATER IN EVAPORATIVE ZONE UPPER LIMIT OF EVAPORATIVE STORAGE LOWER LIMIT OF EVAPORATIVE STORAGE INITIAL SNOW WATER INITIAL WATER IN LAYER MATERIALS TOTAL INITIAL WATER TOTAL SUBSURFACE INFLOW 85.00 100.0 1.000 6.0 1.103 2.358 0.798 0.000 257.367 257.367 0.00 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION AND WEATHER DATA NOTE: EVAPOTRANSPIRATION DATA WAS OBTAINED FROM CHEYENNE WYOMING STATION LATITUDE MAXIMUM LEAF AREA INDEX START OF GROWING SEASON (JULIAN DATE) END OF GROWING SEASON (JULIAN DATE) EVAPORATIVE ZONE DEPTH AVERAGE ANNUAL WIND SPEED AVERAGE 1ST QUARTER RELATIVE HUMIDITY AVERAGE 2ND QUARTER RELATIVE HUMIDITY alb PERCENT ACRES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES INCHES/YEAR 40.59 DEGREES 0.00 138 273 6.0 INCHES 7.50 MPH 52.00 0 54.00 0 AVERAGE 3RD QUARTER RELATIVE HUMIDITY AVERAGE 4TH QUARTER RELATIVE HUMIDITY 50.00 o 51.00 N OTE: PRECIPITATION DATA WAS SYNTHETICALLY GENERATED USING COEFFICIENTS FOR CHEYENNE WYOMING JAN/JUL 0.41 1.87 NORMAL MEAN MONTHLY PRECIPITATION (INCHES) FEB/AUG 0.40 1.39 MAR/SEP 0.97 1.06 APR/OCT 1.24 0.68 MAY/NOV 2.39 0.53 JUN/ DEC N OTE: TEMPERATURE DATA WAS SYNTHETICALLY GENERATED USING COEFFICIENTS FOR CHEYENNE WYOMING JAN/JUL 26.10 68.90 NORMAL MEAN MONTHLY TEMPERATURE (DEGREES FAHRENHEIT) FEB/AUG 29.30 66.80 MAR/SEP 32.10 57.90 APR/OCT 41.80 47.50 MAY/N fV 52.20 34.80 2.00 0.37 JUN/DEC 62.00 29.30 N OTE: SOLAR RADIATION DATA WAS SYNTHETICALLY GENERATED USING COEFFICIENTS FOR CHEYENNE WYOMING AND STATION LATITUDE = 40.59 DEGREES * ************************************************************************ * ***** JUN/DEC PRECIPITATION 0.93 MONTHLY TOTALS (IN INCHES) FOR YEAR 1 JAN/JUL FEB/AUG MAR/SEP APR/OCT MAY/NOV 0.08 0.07 1.13 0.47 1.97 2.49 0.96 1.72 0.96 0.39 0.11 RUNOFF }} 0.000 0.000 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 0.513 0.201 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED 0.1470 FROM LAYER 3 0.0306 0.000 0.000 0.117 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.147 0.242 0.756 0.499 1.378 2.292 0.802 2.007 0.299 0.494 0.0013 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0184 0.1603 0.1164 0.0953 0.0615 0.0474 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH 0.0350 0.0080 0.0015 0.0013 0.0468 0.1090 LAYER 4 0.1130 0.1110 0.1066 0.1084 0.1043 0.1069 MONTHLY SUMMARIES FOR DAILY HEADS (INCHES) AVERAGE DAILY HEAD ON 1.638 TOP OF LAYER 4 0.330 STD. DEVIATION OF DAILY 0.334 HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 0.108 0.014 1.729 0.026 0.194 0.000 1.256 0.001 0.177 0.000 1.063 0.000 0.117 0.000 0.664 0.000 0.134 0.199 0.529 0.283 0.051 * ****************-***********-***********-************* ****-****************-* * ***** * *******************-********-********-***-*****************-****-************* * ***** ANNUAL TOTALS FOR YEAR 1 INCHES CU. FEET PERCENT PRECIPITATION 11.28 100.00 RUNOFF 1.03 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 85.37 DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 6.01 PERC./LEAKAGE T 7.55 ROUGH LAYER 4 AVG. HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 CHANGE IN WATER STORAGE 0.03 SOIL WATER AT START OF YEAR SOIL WATER AT END OF YEAR SNOW WATER AT START OF YEAR 0.00 SNOW WATER AT END OF YEAR 0.00 ANNUAL WATER BUDGET BALANCE 0.00 0.117 9.630 0.6784 0.851747 0.6183 40946.406 423.764 34956.262 2462.526 3091.840 0.003 11.964 257.367 257.370 0.000 934242.125 934254,062 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.048 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * ************************************************************************ * ***** AVERAGE MONTHLY VALUES IN INCHES FOR YEARS 1 THROUGH 1 JAN/JUL FEB/AUG MAR/SEP APR/OCT MAY/NOV JUN/DEC PRECIPITATION TOTALS 0.93 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.08 2.49 STD, DEVIATIONS 0.00 RUNOFF TOTALS 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.000 0.07 1.13 0.96 1.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.117 0.47 1.97 0.96 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 STD. DEVIATIONS 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION TOTALS 0.513 0.201 0.000 0.147 2.292 0.000 0.000 0.242 0.756 0.802 2.007 0.000 0.000 0.499 1.378 0.299 0.494 STD. DEVIATIONS 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 TOTALS 0.1470 0.0306 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0013 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0184 0.1603 0.1164 0.0953 0.0615 0.0474 STD. DEVIATIONS 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 TOTALS 0.1090 0.1069 STD. DEVIATIONS 0.0000 0.0000 0.0350 0.0080 0.0015 0.0013 0.0468 0.1130 0.1110 0.1066 0.1084 0.1043 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 AVERAGES OF MONTHLY AVERAGED DAILY HEADS (INCHES) DAILY AVERAGE HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 AVERAGES 1.6377 0.3297 STD. DEVIATIONS 0.0000 0.0000 0.0141 0.0004 0.0000 0.0000 0.1989 1.7287 1.2556 1.0625 0.6637 0.5286 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 * ************************************************************************ * ***** * ************************************************************************ * ***** 1 AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTALS & (STD. DEVIATIONS) FOR YEARS 1 THROUGH PERCENT PRECIPITATION 100.00 RUNOFF 1.035 INCHES 11.28 0.000) 0.117 ( 0.0000) CU. FEET 40946.4 423.76 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 85.371 LATERAL DRAINAGE COLLECTED 6.01402 FROM LAYER 3 9.630 ( 0.0000) 34956.26 0.67838 ( 0.00000) 2462.526 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH 0.85175 ( 0.00000) 3091.840 7.55094 LAYER 4 AVERAGE HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 CHANGE IN WATER STORAGE 0.029 0.618 ( 0.000) 0.003 ( 0.0000) 11.96 ************************************************************************* ****** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * PEAK DAILY VALUES FOR YEARS 1 THROUGH 1 (INCHES) (CU. FT.) PRECIPITATION RUNOFF DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM LAYER 3 22.27106 PERCOLATION/LEAKAGE THROUGH LAYER 4 13.40275 AVERAGE HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 0.64 0.117 0.00614 0.003692 2.051 MAXIMUM HEAD ON TOP OF LAYER 4 3.809 LOCATION OF MAXIMUM HEAD IN LAYER 3 (DISTANCE FROM DRAIN) 35.4 FEET SNOW WATER 2323.200 423.7645 0.41 1476.5393 MAXIMUM VEG. SOIL WATER (VOL/VOL) 0.2614 MINIMUM VEG. SOIL WATER (VOL/VOL) 0.1330 *** Maximum heads are computed using McEnroe's equations. Reference: Maximum Saturated Depth over Landfill Liner by Bruce M. McEnroe, University of Kansas ASCE Journal of Environmental Engineering Vol. 119, No. 2, March 1993, pp. 262-270. *** * *****-********-********-****-********************-********-****-*************** * **** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * **** FINAL WATER STORAGE AT END OF YEAR 1 LAYER 1 2 3 4 SNOW WATER (INCHES) (VOL/VOL) 1.0839 245■2799 0.3264 10.6800 0.000 0.1806 0.2920 0.0544 0.4450 * ************************************************************************ * **** * *********-***************-*****************-***-************-**************** * **** APPENDIX C-2 LEACHATE TRAVEL TIME CALCULATIONS Golder Associates CALCULATIONS Date: November 18, 2016 Project No.: 1538880 Site Name: North Weld Landfill, unit 2 EDOP Weld County, Colorado Subject: APPENDIX C-2: LEACHATE TRAVEL TIME CALCULATIONS Made by: ALB Checked by: JAR Reviewed by: MEM 1.0 OBJECTIVES Estimate the maximum travel time for leachate to report to a permanent leachate collection sump using the longest hydraulic leachate flow path within the leachate collection drainage layer and leachate drain lines for Unit 2 of North Weld Landfill (NWLF). Verify that the travel times through the longest flow paths are less than 365 days. 2.O METHODOLOGY Use Darcy's Law to calculate travel time through the leachate collection drainage layer and drain lines: —kxixA where: = Discharge k = Hydraulic Conductivity A = Area i = Gradient _kxi A where: q = specific d►scharge kxl where: Vs = Average linear leachate velocity n = Porosity d d n , k t where: T = Leachate travel time d = Maximum leachate travel distance 1.:\15\1588880\0400\0402 edop dft nov16\appendix c_engineering calculations\c-2 - leachate travel time\app c-2 Itt 18nov1.6.docx Golder Associates Inc. 44 Union Boulevard, suite 300 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Tel: (303) 980-0540 Fax: (303) 985-2080 vo w.golder.com Golder Associates: Operations in Africa, Asia, Australasia, Europe, North America and South America Golder, Colder Associates and the GA globe design are trademarks of Golder Associates Corporation LEACHATE TRAVEL TIME CALCULATIONS Page 2 of 3 Project No.: 1538880 Made by: ALB Site Name: North Weld Landfill, Unit 2 EDOP Checked by: JAR -la Date: November 18, 2016 Reviewed by: MEM fl 3.0 ASSUMPTIONS AND DESIGN PARAMETERS Leachate travel time calculations were based on the following assumptions and design parameters: • It was assumed that leachate flow through the leachate collection drainage layer and drain lines follows Darcy's Law. ■ It was assumed that the hydraulic gradient of the leachate is equivalent to the slope of the landfill floor. • Leachate travel times were calculated for the following design slopes and conservative estimates of post -consolidation slopes: • Landfill floor slopes: Design slope: 2.8% - Post -consolidation slope: 2.64% to 2.90% • Drain line slopes: Design slope: 2.15% Post -consolidation slope: 2.12% to 2.20% • Material properties of the granular leachate collection drainage layer material and gravel drain line material are as follows: • Granular drainage layer: Hydraulic conductivity (k): 0.01 cm/sec (EDOP minimum requirement) Porosity: 0.3 (NAVFAC 1986) • Drain line gravel: Hydraulic conductivity (k): 1 cm/sec (EDOP minimum requirement) - Porosity: 0.25 (Linsley, Kohler, and Paulhus 1982) 4.0 CALCULATIONS Maximum leachate travel times were calculated for the longest hydraulic leachate flow paths within Phases 4 and 5 of Unit 2 as shown in the attached Figure 1. Calculations are summarized in Tables 1 and 2 below for design slopes and post -consolidation slopes, respectively: Table 1: Leachate Travel Time - Design Slopes Phase Granular Drainage Layer Drain Line - Total Flow Travel Slope Length Flow (ft) Velocity (ft/sec) Travel (days) Time Travel Slope (%) Length (ft) Velocity (ft/sec) Time (days) Time (days) 4 2.8 812 0.00003 307 2.15 3,104 0.02351 13 320 5 2.8 818 0.00003 309 2.15 2,321 0.00282 10 319 i:115\1538880\040010402 edop dft novl6\appendix c_engineering calculations\c-2 - leachate travel time\app o-2 itt 18nov16.decx Golder Associates LEACHATE TRAVEL TIME CALCULATIONS Page 3 of 3 Project No.: 1538880 Made by: ALB Site Name: North Weld Landfill, Unit 2 EDOP I Checked by: JAR iar Date: November 18, 2016 Reviewed by: MEM . ', Table 2: Leachate Travel Time — Post -Settlement Slopes Phase Granular Drainage Layer Drain Line Total Time Slope (%) Flow Length (ft) Velocity (ftlsec) Travel Time (days) Slope Flow Length (ft) Velocity (ftlsec) Travel (days) Travel (days) Time 4 2.64 845 0.00003 2.20 1,270 0.00289 5 351 338 2.12 1,834 0.00278 , 8 5 2.80 820 0.00003 2.17 1,149 0.00285 5 • 309 p 299 2.19 1,172 0.00287 5 5.0 CONCLUSIONS The maximum leachate travel times calculated were approximately 320 days for design slopes in both Phases 4 and 5. Post -consolidation floor slopes in Phase 4 result in an increase in travel time to approximately 351 days. Post -consolidation floor slopes in Phase 5 actually result in an increase in floor slopes and a reduction in travel time to approximately 309 days. All calculated travel times were less than 12 months for design and post -consolidation conditions. 6.0 REFERENCES Linsley, R.K. Jr., M.A. Kohler, and J.L.H. Paulhus. 1982. Hydrology for Engineers. Third Edition. Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC). 1986. Design Manual 7.01, Soil Mechanics. Revalidated September 1. i:\15\1538880\0400\0402 edop dft nov16\appendix c_engineering calculations\c-2 - leachate travel tirne\app c-2 Itt 18nov16-docx Golder Associates FIGURE 1 LEACHATE TRAVEL TIME Primed By: ALEBmwn Date: 2016-11-18 T me:14:20:51 AM File Name: 1538880BO03.dwg I Last Ecitec By: alebrovan Date: 2010-11-18 Tirne:9:25:17 AM Path: LiDenver.galder.gds'acad115i1536860APRODUCTIONtB - Figures LEGEND NOTES 5280 EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY (SEE NOTE 1) PROPOSED LINER SUBGRADE PROPERTY BOUNDARY (SEE NOTE 4) USR 1527 BOUNDARY EXISTING LIMIT OF WASTE (UNIT 1) CRITICAL LEACHATE FLOW PATH 1. EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY IS ACOMPOSITE OF AEROMETRIC INC. PHOTOGRAPHY DATED JANUARY 26, 2012 AND MILLER CREEK AERIAL MAPPING PHOTOGRAPHY DATED FEBRUARY 21; 2016. 2. EXISTING CONTOUR INTERVAL IS 2 FEET BASED ON NAVD88 ELEVATIONS. 3. COORDINATE SYSTEM ISIN NAD27 STATE PLANE COLORADO NORTH. CLIENT WASTE MANAGEMENT DISPOSAL SERVICES OF COLORADO, INC. CONSULTANT YYYY-MM-DD 2016-11-1B DESIGNED ALB PREPARED ALB REVIEWED JAR APPROVED MEM 0 200 400 1" = 400' FEET PROJ ECT NORTH WELD LANDFILL, UNIT 2 SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO TITLE CRITICAL LEACHATE FLOW PATHS PROJECT NO.. 1538880 -II IF THIS MEASUREMENT DOES NOT MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN. THE SHEETSIZE HAS BEEN MODIFIED FROM: ANSI @ APPENDIX C-3 LEACHATE COLLECTION HEADER PIPE STRENGTH CALCULATIONS a,, SUBJECT: IHDPE Leachate Collection Pipe - Structural Integrity Calculations Job Number: 1538880 Project: North � Unit Weld Landfill 2 EDOP Made by: ALB Checked: DVS Reviewed: JAR Date: 11/18/2016 Golder Associates PIPE STRUCTURAL DESIGN OBJECTIVE: REFERENCES: Check the structural integrity of the buried leachate collection pipe by evaluating the factors of safety against pipe crushing, wall buckling, and deflection. 1. PolyPipe Industries, Inc., Design and Engineering Guide for Polyethylene Piping. 2005 2. The Plastics Pipe Institute (PPI), Handbook of Polyethylene Pipe (2nd ed.) 3. McGrath, T.J. "Replacing E' with the Constrained Modulus in Buried Pipe Design." Proceedings of the Conference, Pipelines in the Constructed Environment, ASCE. 1998 4. Qian, X. Koerner, R.M., and Gray, D.H., Geotechnical Aspects of Landfill Design and Construction. 2002. 5. Bowles, J. Foundation Analysis and Design. 1988. 6. Goddard, J.B. ADS Technical Report 4.103. April, 2004. 7. ISCO Industries HDPE Pipe TyPical Physical Properties 8. FEMA Plastic Pipe Used in Embankment Dams, Best Practices for Design, Construction, Problem. Identification and Evaluation, Inspection, Maintenance, Renovation, and Repair. November 2007. 9. Swift River Environmental Services, LLC. Report of Geotechnical Investigation: North Weld Landfill Unit 2 Permitting and Development. Draft Final Report. June 2016. PIPE PROPERTIES: Pipe type: 6 -inch dia. perforated smooth wall PE pipe SDR: wall thickness: inside diameter: outside diameter: mean diameter: mean radius: moment of intertia: pipe modulus of elasticity (initial): pipe modulus of elasticity (long-term): pipe compressive yield strength (initial): PIPE BEDDING PROPERTIES: Bedding material: Gravel deflection lag factor: bedding constant: modulus of soil reaction: Stress -dependent constrained modulus Poisson's ratio Stress -dependent constrained modulus: where: Di Dry _ R= I= Ep-i Ep-It PA-i = Lt K= Es= Ms = is_ 11 0.602 5.350 6.625 5.952 2.976 0.018 100,000 25,000 1,440 inches inches inches inches inches in4/in (PolyPipe) (PolyPipe) (PolyPipe) (PolyPipe) psi (PolyPipe) psi (PolyPipe) psi (ISCO) = 90% of solid pipe compressive strength to conservatively account for 10% perforated surface area (FEMA) 1.0 0.083 4100 see below 0.4 1483 (O- )0"34 a1 = Vertical overburden stress (Qian, Koerner, and Gray) (Qian, Koerner, and Gray) (Qian, Koerner, and Gray) (Roberts) (Bowles) (Roberts) Page 1 of 4 I:\ 15\1538880\040010402 EDOP DFT NOV16\Appendix C_Engineering Calculations\C-3 - Pipe Strength\App C-3 Pipe Integrity Cale 18N0V16.xlsx SUBJECT: IHDPE Leachate Collection Pipe - Structural Integrity Calculations - t b'AtGouder � Associates Job Number: 1538880 project: North Unit Weld Landfill 2 EDOP Made by: ALB Checked: DVS Reviewed: JAR Date: 11/18/2016 CALCULATIONS: 1. Calculate the maximum overburden stress acting on the pipe: Waste Thickness = Density = Drainage Media Thickness = Density Final Cover Thickness = Density 60 feet 65.0 pcf 2.5 feet 125 pcf 3 feet 120 pcf Total Overburden Pressure (avo) = Total Overburden Pressure (ova) = 2. Calculate the stress -dependent constrained modulus: 1kJ! _ 1483 (a I )° . 34 3. Calculate the vertical arching factor (VAF): VAF _ 0.88 - 0.71 'A —1 Sri +=.5 4,592 psf 31.9 psi Ms = 4,812.8 psi (PPI) where: VAF = Vertical arching factor S,A, = Hoop thrust stiffness ratio 1.43 A 1 s 1 CLVT EA where: Hoop thrust stiffness ratio: Vertical arching factor: (PPI) Ms = One-dimensional modulus of soil (psi) rcenl = Radius to centroidal axis of pipe (in.) E = Apparent modulus of elasticity of pipe material (psi) A = Profile wall average wall thickness (in.) 4. Calculate the maximum design load on the pipe: PT = ( 0) x (VAF) CRUSHING ANALYSIS: 1. Define the minimum acceptable factor of safety against pipe crushing: Acceptable factor of safety = 2 SA_ VAF = 0.34 1.04 P'T = 33.3 psi Page 2 of 4 I:\ 15\1538880\040010402 EDOP DFT NOV16\Appendix C_Engineering Calculations\C-3 - Pipe Strength\App C-3 Pipe Integrity Cale 18N0V16.xlsx SUBJECT: IHDPE Leachate Collection Pipe - Structural Integrity Calculations - t b'AtGouder � Associates Job Number: 1538880 Project: North Unit Weld Landfill 2 EDOP Made by: ALB Checked: DVS Reviewed: JAR Date: 11/18/2016 CRUSHING ANALYSIS: 2. Calculate the maximum axial stress acting on the pipe (PSA) (PPI) �+P JD 288 where:. S = Critical crushing pressure PE = Maximum axial stress (psf) from earth loading PL = Axial stress from live load (psf); neglected DR = Dimension ratio (D't) S = 183.4 psi CRUSHING ANALYSIS [tont.]: 3. Calculate the factor of safety against pipe crushing: Factor of Safety (PA/PsA) = 7.9 (OK) BUCKLING ANALYSIS: 1. Define the minimum acceptable factor of safety against pipe buckling: Acceptable factor of safety = 2 2. Calculate the critical buckling pressure, Per: Pcr where: (PPI) Par = Critical buckling pressure ) = Calibration factor (0.55 for granular soils) RH = Geometry factor (1.0 for deep burials in uniform. soil) Dm = Mean pipe diameter (in.) E = Apparent modulus of elasticity of pipe (psi) I = Moment of intertia of pipe wall (in4/in) E*s = Secant modulus of soil (psi) E*S = Es/(1-p.) Per - Initial = 974.7 psi Pcr - LongTerm = 614.0 psi 3. Calculate the factor of safety against pipe buckling: Factor of Safety (PJPT) - Initial = 29.2 (OK) Factor of Safety (PciPT) - Long-term = 18.4 (OK) Page 3 of 4 I:\ 15\1538880\040010402 EDOP DFT NOV16\Appendix C_Engineering Calculations\C-3 - Pipe Strength\App C-3 Pipe Integrity Cale 18N0V16.xlsx SUBJECT: IHDPE Leachate Collection Pipe - Structural Integrity Calculations - t b'AtGouder � Associates Job Number: 1538880 Project: North Unit Weld Landfill 2 EDOP Made by: ALB Checked: DVS Reviewed: JAR Date: 11/18/2016 RING DEFLECTION ANALYSIS: 1. Define the allowable ring deflection: Allowable ring deflection (SDR 11) _ 3% 2. Determine maximum pipe deflection, using the modified Iowa Equation: AY KPT 3 „, E,31 +0.06 . 3 where: (ADS) AY = Vertical pipe deflection (in.) Dm = Mean diameter of pipe Lf = Deflection lag factor K = Bedding constant PT = Maximum design load (psi) R = Radius of pipe (in.) Ep = Pipe modulus of elasticity (psi) I = Moment of intertia of pipe wall (in4/in) Ms = Stress -dependent constrained modulus (psi) (Dian, Koerner, and Gray) Pipe Deflection (AY/Dr„) - Initial = 0.76% (OK) Pipe Deflection (11Y/Dm) - Long-term = 0.89% (OK) CONCLUSIONS: The 6 -inch HDPE SDR-11 perforated leachate collection pipe will be able to withstand the proposed overburden stresses under the maximum waste height. Additionally, the maximum estimated pipe deflection was determined to be adequate. The following safety factors were computed for the leachate drainage pipe: Wall Crushing Safety Factor: Wall Buckling Safety Factor (Initial): Wall Buckling Safety Factor (Long-term): Maxmum pipe deflection (Initial): Maxmum pipe deflection Long-term): i 7.9 29.2 18.4 0.8% 0.9% 2 2 2 3% 3% Page 4 of 4 I:\ 15\1538880\040010402 EDOP DFT NOV16\Appendix C_Engineering Calculations\C-3 - Pipe Strength\App C-3 Pipe Integrity Cale 18N0V16.xlsx APPENDIX C-4 FOUNDATION CONSOLIDATION CALCULATIONS a r SUBJECT: 'Foundation Soil Consolidation and Differential Settlement Calculations - Phase 4 Job Project: Number: 1538880 North Unit Weld 2 EDP Landfill 1Checked: Made Reviewed: by: ALB DVSire JAR Date: 11/18/2016 Page: 1 of 4 t7AtGoidcr Associates OBJECTIVES: 1. Calculate potential primary and secondary consolidation settlement (total and differential) of the foundation soils in Phase 4 of the North Weld Landfill Unit 2 assuming maximum waste elevations and final cover conditions. 2. Estimate the maximum change in the slope of the landfill liner floor grades and in the leachate collection header trench as a result of differential foundation settlement. REFERENCES: 1. Das, Braja M. Principles of Geotechnical Engineering. 5th ed, 2002. 2. Das, Braja M. Principles of Foundation Engineering. 5th ed, 2004. 3. Sharma, Hari D. and Anirban De. "Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Settlement: Postclosure Perspectives." Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironrnental Engineering , Vol. 133, No. 6, June 2007. 4. Report of Geotechnica/ investigation, North Weld Landfill Unit 2, Permitting and Development . Swift River Environmental Services, LLC. Draft Final, June 2016. 5. Advanced Terra Testing Consolidation Report (ASTM D2435 Method B) from Job No. 2952-1, Boring No. NWE-8, Sample No. 18'-20'. Dated 03/21/16. 6. Advanced Terra Testing Consolidation Report (ASTM 02435 Method B) from Job No. 2952-1, Boring No. NWE-16, Sample No. 14'-16'. Dated 03/25/16. METHODOLOGY: 1. Apply Terzaghi's one-dimensional consolidation model to foundation soils to calculate primary and secondary 2. Calculate consolidation at three points along the leachate collection header trench and at two points on the landfill liner floor under varying overburden pressures from overlying waste. The locations of the survey points are shown in the 3. Calculate change in design grade along leachate collection header trench and on landfill liner floor resulting from differential settlement SITE DATA: 1. As presented in Swift River's Report of Geotechnical Investigation, North Weld Landfill Unit 2, Permitting and Development report, the subsurface conditions within the North Weld Landfill Unit 2 area generally consist unconsolidated eolian surficial deposits of clayey silt and very fine to fine-grained silty sand interbedded by alluival coarser -grained sand and fine gravel and overlying sedimentary rock from the Laramie Formation. 2. It was conservatively assumed that the entire subsurface strata through the top of the Laramie Formation consists of compressible material and that no significant deformation of the Laramie Formation rock will occur. 3. Consolidation parameters were derived from two consolidation tests run on undisturbed soil samples collected from soil borings NWE-16 (14'-16') and NW E-8 (18'-20'). It was assumed that the derived consolidation parameters are representative of the entire subsurface strata through the top of the Laramie Formation. 4. Primary settlement of MSW typically occurswithin the first four months after load placement (Sharma and De, 2007). Therefore, primary settlement was assumed to be completed after four months. Secondary settlement was calculated at 50 years following the construction of Unit 2 to allow for a 20 -year operational life and 30 -year post -closure period. ANALYSIS: 1. Define material properties: Waste Unit Weight (Ywaste) = 65 Liner Thickness (H, ) = 2.0 Liner Unit Weight (YL) = 130 Final Cover Thickness (HFc) = 2.5 Final Cover Unit Weight (YFc) = 100 pcf ft pcf ft pcf Reference WMDSC NWLF EDOP Swift River, 2016 WMDSC NWLF EDOP Swift River, 2016 I:\15\1538880\0400\0402 EDOP DFT NOV16\Appendix C_Engineering Calculations\C-4 - Consolidation\App C-4_Settlement Calc 18NOV16.xlsx SUBJECT: 'Foundation Soil Consolidation and Differential Settlement Calculations - Phase 4 Job Number: Project: 1538880 North Unit Weld 2 EDOP Landfill Made Checked: Reviewed: by: ALB DVS JAR l) 5 42„ Date: 11/18/2016 Page: 2 of 4 Golder Associates Define material properties cont.]: Moist Unit Weight of Soil (Y) = 99 pcf Swift River, 2016 Co = 0.22 Swift River, 2016 Cr = 0.032 Swift River, 2016 Ca = 0.0029 Terra Testing, 2016 ea = 0.831 Terra Testing, 2016 ep = 0.715 Terra Testing, 2016 OCR = 1,05 Swift River, 2016 Define settlement points: Settlement Point 4-A 4-B 4-C 4-D 4-E Existing Elev. (ft amsl) 5149.5 5109.9 5078.6 5120.8 5116.5 Bedrock Elev. (ft amsl) 5122.5 5080.0 5032.3 5102.0 5091.0 Subgrade Grade Elev. (ft amsl) 5131.5 5092.0 5052.5 5114.7 5113.6 Final Cover Elev. (ft amsl) I 5164.3 5232.1 5103.6 5232.3 5240.7 Groundwater Elev. (ft amsl) 5032.0 5032.0 5032.0 5032.0 5032.0 Thickness of Soil Unit (Ho) (ft) 9.0 12.0 20.2 12.7 22.6 Top of Waste Elev. cft) 5,161.8 5,229.6 5,101.1 5,229.8 5,238.2 Top of Liner (ft) 5,133.5 5,094.0 5,054.5 5,116.7 5.115.6 Waste Thickness (Hwaste) (ft) I 28 136 47 113 123 H0/2 (ft) 4.5 6.0 10.1 6.4 11.3 H0/2 Elev. (ft amsl) 5,127 5,08.6 5,042 5,108 5,102 Sat. Thickness above H0/2 (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 Preco►nsol. Pressure (P'R) (psf) 2335 2484 3759 1293 1482 3. Calculate the initial effective overburden stress: The calculation of initial effective stress assumes that excavation to subgrade elevations has occurred prior to cell construction and pore pressure has equalized. The initial effective overburden stress is calculated at the midpoint of each compressible layer using the following equation: Pr; _ ) } i L11 ` u. where: P'o= Hi= Yi= u= Initial Effective Overburden Stress (psf) Layer Height (ft) Moist Unit Weight of Soil (pcf) Pore Pressure (psf) (saturated thickness above soil layer midpoint x 62.4 pcf) Settlement Point 4-A 4-B 4-C 4-D 4-E u (psf) 0 0� 0 0 P'0 (Psf 444.7 r' }�y0 593.6 99! .8 630.2 10.2 1116.0 4. Calculate the effective stress increase due to the landfill: AP = Y.F-cf pc +' Ywaste [' rite + Ylr 1. where: by = YFc = HFC= )(waste = Hwaste = YL HL Effective Stress Increase, psf Final Cover Unit Weight, pcf Final Cover Thickness, ft Waste Unit Weight, pcf Waste Thickness, ft Liner Density, pcf Liner System Thickness, ft IAt15\1538880\0400\0402 EDOP DFT NOV161Appendix C_Engineering CalcuFFations\C-4 - Consolidation'U4,pp C-4_Settlement Calc IBNOV16.xlsx Golder SUBJECT: 'Foundation Soil Consolidation and Differential Settlement Calculations - Phase 4 Job Project: Number. 1538880 North Weld Unit 2 EDOP Landfill Made Checked: Reviewed: by: ALB DVS JAR 0 S Date: 11/18/2016 Page: 3 of 4 Associates 4. Calculate the effective stress increase due to the landfill [cont.1: Settlement Point 4-A 4-B 4-C 4-D 4-E Waste Pressure (psf) 1,840 8, 3,030815 7, 347 7,969 Final Cover Pressure (psf) 25 } 250 250 250 Liner Pressure (psf) 260 260 260 260 260 AP iPsf) 2,35x, 3,5407,857 8,479 Using Terzaghi's 1-0 consolidation theory, primary consolidation is calculated using the following equations: If P'0 + ap > Pep, then: + tro „ x log( n, i1/4„1-Feo try, * bar0 ) X og + -i- Po I If P'0 + 4p < PIP, then: 7 C' '_ FIG xlo 7Q I � CU r� where: S= = Cr= H0= eq = Primary consolidation settlement (ft) Compression Index Recom pression Index Thickness of Soil Unit (ft) Initial void ratio ap = Effective stress increase (psf) P'0 = Initial effective stress (psf) Pip = Preconsolidation Pressure (psf) Settlement Point 4-A 4-B 4-C 4-D 4-E Ho(ft)= 9.0 12.0 20.2 12.7 22.6 1+e0 = 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 H01(1 +e0) = 4.9 6.6 11.0 TO 12.3 P'p (psf) = 2334.6 2483.7 3759.4 1293.1 1482.3 P'o (psf) = 444.7 593.6 997.8 630.2 1116.0 ap (psf) = 2349.8 9324.6 3539.7 7857.2 8478.7 FP/P'0 = 5.3 4.2 3.8 2.1 1.3 lo9(P'p/P'0) = 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.3 0.1 11p+13'Q = 2794.5 9918.1 4537.5 8487.4 9594.8 (Ap-FP'0)/Wp = 1.2 4.0 1.2 6.6 6.5 log ((dp+P'0)/P'p) = 0.08 0.60 0.08 0.82 0.81 (ap+P'o)!P'0 = 6.3 16.7 4.5 13.5 8.6 log(( ►p+P'0)/P'0) 0.80 1.22 0.66 1.13 0.93 Sarirnarw (ft) = 0.19 0.98 0,39 1.29 2.20 6. Using Terzaghi's 1-O consolidation theory, secondary consolidation is calculated using the following equation: t2 55 = l where: Os_ a = H= ti, t2 = Secondary consolidation settlement (ft) Secondarycompression index Thickness of Soil Unit (ft) Tim e IA15\1538880\040010402 EDOP DFT NOV181Appendix C_Engineering Calculations\+ -4 - Consolidation'App C-4_Settletnerd Cale 18NOV16.xlsx A SUBJECT: 'Foundation Soil Consolidation and Differential Settlement Calculations - Phase 4 Job Project Number: 1538880 North Unit 2 Weld EDOP Landfill Made Checked: Reviewed: by: ALB DVS JAR I75 oeg,_ Date: 11/18/2016 Page: 4 of 4 Golder Associates 6. Using Terzaghi*s 1-D consolidation theory, secondary consolidation is calculated using the following equation cunt.]: Settlement Point 4-A 4-B 4-C 4-D 4-E C', 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 l --1 = , 8.8 i 11.0 19.8 11.4 20.4 t1 (yrs)= I 0.33 0.33 0.33 g 0.33 0.33 t2 (yrs) = 30 30 30 30 30 log (t2/ti) 1.95 1.95 1.95 1.95 1.95 Ss (ft) = 0.03 0.04 0,06 0.04 0.07 Sum the primary and secondary settlement to calculate total settlement: Settlement Point 4-A 4-B 4-C 4-D 4-E Spnmary (ft) = 0.19 0.98 0.39 1.29 2.20 Ssecondary (ft) = 0.03 0.04 0.06 0.04 0.07 Stot$l (ft) = 0.22 4 1.01 a 0.46 1.33 2.26 8. Calculate post settlement slope between settlement points: Settlement Point Design Grade (ft amsl) Liner Settlement Total (ft) Final Grade (ft amyl) Liner Distance Lateral (ft) Design Slope (%) Final (%) Slope Xslope (%) 4-A 5131.5 ., 0.2 5131.3 -2.15% -2.20% -0.04% 1834.0 4-B 5092.0 1.01 5091.0 4-B 5092.0 1.01 5001.0 5052.0 -2.15% -2.12°% 0.03% 1834.0 4-05052.5 0.46 4-A 5131.5 0.22 5131.3 -2,15% -2.16% -0.01% 3668 0 4-C 5052.5 0.46 5052.0 4-D 5114._7 1.33 5113.4 -2.80% -2.76% 0.04°/° 812.1 4-B 5092.0 1.01 5091.0 -E 5113.6 . T 5111.3 -2.80% -2.64% 0.16% 769.9 4-B 5092.0 1.01 5091.0 CONCLUSIONS: 1. For settlement analysis, the maximum final slope after differential settlement presents the critical slope for leachate flow after closure of the landfill. Differential settlement in the landfill results in an increase in the slope of the leachate collection trench of 0.03%,resulting in a maximum final slope of -2.12% between points 5-B and 5-C. Additionally, differential settlement along the floor grades results in an increase of 0.16%, resulting in a maximum final slope of -2.64% between points 4-E and 4-B. I:\15\153688010400\0402 EDOP EFT NOV161Appendix C_Engineering Calculations\C-4 - Consolidation\App C-4_Settlenent Cabo 18NOV16.xlsx OBJECTIVES: ol4er Associates SUBJECT: Job Number: Project: Foundation Soil Consolidation and Differential Settlement Calculations - Phase 5 1538880 North Weld Landfill Unit 2 EDOP Made by: Checked: Revi ewed: ALB DVS PS JAR AL Date: Page: 11/18/2016 1 of 4 1. Calculate potential primary and secondary consolidation settlement (total and differential) of the foundation soils in Phase 5 of the North Weld Landfill Unit 2 assuming maximum waste elevations and final cover conditions. 2. Estimate the maximum change in the slope of the landfill liner floor grades and in the leachate collection header trench as a result of differential foundation settlement. REFERENCES: 1. Das, Braja M. Principles of Geotechnical Engineering. 5th ed, 2002. 2. Das, Braja M. Principles of Foundation Engineering. 5th ed, 2004. 3. Sharma, Hari D. and Anirban De. "Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Settlement: Postclosure Perspectives." Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering , Vol. 133, No. 6, June 2007. 4. Report of Geotechnica/ Investigation, North Weld Landfill Unit 2, Permitting and Development . Swift River Environmental Services, LLC. Draft Final, June 2016. 5. Advanced Terra Testing Consolidation Report (ASTM D2435 Method B) from Job No. 2952-1, Boring No. NWE-8, Sample No. 18`-20'. Dated 03/21/16. 6. Advanced Terra Testing Consolidation Report (ASTM D2435 Method B) from Job No. 2952-1, Boring No. NWE-16, Sample No. 14'-16'. Dated 03/25/16. METHODOLOGY: 1. Apply Terzaghi's one-dimensional consolidation model to foundation soils to calculate primary and secondary 2. Calculate consolidation at three points along the leachate collection header trench and at two points on the landfill liner floor under varying overburden pressures from overlying waste. The locations of the survey points are shown in the 3. Calculate change in design grade along leachate collection header trench and on landfill liner floor resulting from differential settlement . SITE DATA: 1. As presented in SVMt River's Report of Geotechnical Investigation, North Weld Landfill Unit 2, Permitting and Development report, the subsurface conditions within the North Weld Landfill Unit 2 area generally consist unconsolidated eolian surficial deposits of clayey silt and very fine to fine-grained silty sand interbedded by alluival coarser -grained sand and fine gravel and overlying sedimentary rock from the Laramie Formation. 2. It was conservatively assumed that the entire subsurface strata through the top of the Laramie Formation consists of compressible material and that no significant deformation of the Laramie Formation rock will occur. 3. Consolidation parameters were derived from two consolidation tests run on undisturbed soil samples collected from soil borings NINE -16 (14'-16') and NWE-8 (18'-20'). It was assumed that the derived consolidation parameters are representative of the entire subsurface strata through the top of the Laramie Formation. 4. Primary settlement of MSW typically occurs within the first four months after load placement (Sharma and De, 2007). Therefore, primary settlement was assumed to be completed after four months. Secondary settlement was calculated at 50 years following the construction of Unit 2 to allow for a 20 -year operational life and 30 -year post -closure period. ANALYSIS: 1. Define material properties: Waste Unit Weight (Ywaste) Liner Thickness (HL) = Liner Unit Weight (ID = Final Cover Thickness (HO = Final Cover Unit Weight (yFC) _ 65 pet 2.0 ft 130 pcf 2.5 ft 100 pcf Reference WMDSC NWLF EDOP Swift River, 2016 WMDSC NWLF EDOP Swift River, 2016 IM5\1538880\0400\0402 EDOP DFT NOV16\Appendix C_Engineering Calculations\C-4 - Consolidation'App O-4_Settdement Cale 18NOV16.xlsx r SUBJECT: Foundation Soil Consolidation and Differential Settlement Calculations - Phase 5 Job Project: Number: 1538880 North Unit 2 Weld EDOP Landfill Made Checked: Reviewed: by: ALB DVS JAR Date: 11/18/2016 Page: 2 of 4 Golder Associates F 1. Define material properties f cunt.]: Moist Unit Weight of Soil (y) = 99 pcf Swift River, 2016 Cc = 0.22 Cr _ _ eo = 0.831 eP = 0.609 OCR = 1.05 Swift River, 2016 0.032 Swift River, 2016 0.0029 Terra Testing, 2016 2. Define settlement hints: Terra Testing, 2016 Terra Testing, 2016 Swift River, 2016 Settlement Point 5-A 5-B 5-C 5-D 5-E Existing Elev. (ft amsl) 5116.6 5101.2 5079.1 i 5115.2 5108.3 Bedrock Elev. (ft amsl) 5084.2 5066.3 4996.0 5101.0 5071.8 Subgrade Grade Elev. (ft arnsf) 5105.0 5079.7 5054.5 5102.7 5100.4 Final Cover Elev. (ft amsl) 5154.6 5223.0 5127.3 i 5243.0 5139.6 Groundwater Elev. (ft amsl) 5032.0 5032.0 5032.0 5032.0 5032.0 Thickness of Soil Unit (H4) (ft) 20.8 28.6 13.4 58.5 1.7 Top of Waste Elev. (ft) 5,152.1 5,220.5 5,124.8 5,240.5 5,137.1 ,Top of Liner (ft) 5,107.0 5,081.7 5,056.5 5,104.7 5,102.4 'Waste Thickness (Hwaste) (ft) 45 139 68 136 35 H0/2 (ft) 10.4 6.7 29.3 0.9 14.3 Ho'2 Elev. (ft amsl) 5,095 5,073 5,025 5,102 5,086 Sat. Thickness above H0/2 (ft) 0 0 7 0 0 Preconsol. Pressure (P'1) (psf) 2286 2930 5599 1390 2311 Calculate the initial effective overburden stress: The calculation of initial effective stress assumes that excavation to subgrade elevations has occurred prior to cell construction and pore pressure has equalized. The initial effective overburden stress is calculated at the midpoint of each compressible layer using the following equation: Po _ Y� H► where: P'o- Hi = Yi = u= Initial Effective Overburden Stress (psf) Layer Height (ft) Moist Unit Weight of Soil (pcf) Pore Pressure (psf) (saturated thickness above soil layer midpoint x 62.4 pcf) Settlement Point I 5-A 5-B 5-C 5-0 5-E u (psf) 0 0 0 0 I 0 I P'0 (Psf) I 1029.6 664.9 2894.8 84.4 1417.7 Calculate the effective stress increase due to the landfill: Ail = ire T Fc Ywaste Htvaste + Yt Hta where: ap = YFC = HFc Iwaste = Hwaste = YL _ HL= Effective Stress Increase, psf Final Cover Unit Weight, pcf Final Cover Thickness, ft Waste Unit Weight, pcf Waste Thickness, ft Liner Density, pcf Liner System Thickness, ft I:\1511538850\0400\0402 EDOP DFT N0V161Appendix C_Engineering Calculations\C-4 - Consolidation\App C-4_Settlement Cale 1BN0V16.xlsx SUBJECT: (Foundation Soil Consolidation and Differential Settlement Calculations - Phase 5 Job Project: Number: 1538880 North Weld Unit 2 EDOP Landfill Made Checked: Reviewed: by: ALB DVS 17 JAR Date: 11/18/2016 Page: 3 of 4 Golder Associates 4. Calculate the effective stress increase due to the landfill [cont.]: Settlement Point 5-A ' 5-B I 5-C 5-D 5-E Waste Pressure (psf) 2,933 9,019 4,442 8,826 2,258 Final Cover Pressure (psf) 250 250 250 250 250 Liner Pressure (psf) 260 260 260 260 260 AP (Psfl 3,443 9,529 4,952 9,336 _ 2,768 5. Using Terzaghi's 1-D consolidation theory, primary consolidation is calculated using the following equations: If P'0 + 4p > Pip, then: (1+ en )xicig( If P'o + ap < P'p, then: '_'Hxlog tI0 where: S= c Cr= Ho = e0 = r (1H+Qco Ap' ,) j x lOg Ali + f': i 1., Primary consolidation settlement (ft) Compression Index Recompression Index Thickness of Soil Unit (ft) Initial void ratio 1 ap P'a = rp- Effective stress increase (psi) Initial effective stress (psf) Preconsolidation Pressure (psf) Settlement Point 5-A 5-B 5-C 5-E 5-D H0 (ft) = 20.8 13.4 58.5 1.7 28.6 1+e0 = 1.8 f 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 H0/(1 +e0) = 11.4 7.3 32.0 0.9 15.7 Pp (psf) = 2286.5 2930.4 5599.4 1389.8 2311.0 P'0 (psf) _ 1029.6 664.9 a 2894.8 84.4 1417.7 ap (psf) = 3443.1 1 9528.8 R 4952.1 I 9336.1 2768.4 Pip 'P'0 = 2.2 4.4 1.9 16.5 1.6 log(P'p/P'0) = 0.3 0.6 0.3 1.2 0.2 Ap+P'0 = 4472.6 10193.7 7846.9 9420.5 4186.1 (AP-i`P'0)/P'p = 2.0 3.5 1.4 6.8 1.8 log ((Ap+P'0)/P'p) = 0.29 0.54 0.15 0.83 0.26 (gyp+P'o)J'P'0 = 4.3 15.3 2.7 111.7 3.0 log((Ap+P'0)/P'0) 0,64 119 0.43 2.05 0A7 Sorimary (ft) = 0.84 1.00 1.30 0.20 0.97 6. Using Terzaghi's 1-0 consolidation theory, secondary consolidation is calculated using the following equation: Ss _ C'a1Ilo cj ( 2) t-, where: Ss = Ca H= ti, t2 = Secondary consolidation settlement (ft) Secondary compression index Thickness of Soil Unit (ft) Time l:\15\1538880\0400\0402 EDOP EFT NOV16\Appendix C_Engineering DalculationskC-4 - Consolidation\App C-4_Settlement Cale 18NOV1$.xisx 'SUBJECT: 'Foundation Soil Consolidation and Differential Settlement Calculations - Phase 5 y . A Gofer Job Project: Number: 1538880 North Weld Landfill Made Checked: by: ALB DVS 1P Date: 11/18/2016 Page: 4 of 4 Associates Unit 2 EDOP Reviewed: JAR I B. Using Terzaghi's 1-D consolidation theory, secondary consolidation is calculated using the following equation [cont.]: Settlement Point 5-A 5-B 5-C 5-E 5-D C'a 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 F -I = 20.0 12.4 57.2 1.5 27.7 t1 (yrs)= 0.33 0.33 0.33 i 0.33 0.33 t2 (yrs) = 30 T 30 t 30 30 30 log (t2/ti) 1.95 1.95 1.95 1.95 1.95 S$ (ft) = 0.07 0.04 0.20 0,01 0.10 7. Sum the primary and secondary settlement to calculate total settlement: Settlement Point 5-A 5-B 5-C 5-D i 5-E Sprinary (ft) = 0.84 1.00 1.30 0.20 0.97 Ssecondany (ft) = 0.07 0.04 0.20 0.01 0.10 Stot$i (ft) = 0.91 1.05 1.49 0.21 1.07 8. Calculate post settlement slope between settlement points: Settlement Point Design (ft Grade amsl) Liner Total Settlement (ft) Final Grade (ft amsl) Liner Distance Lateral (ft) Design Slope (%) Final Slope (%) .slope (%) 5-A 5105.0 4 0.91 5104.1 1171.9 -2.15% -2.17% -0.01% 5-B 50791 - 1.05 5078.7 5-B 5079.7 5078.7 -2.15°! -2.19°! -0.04°! 1.05 117'1.9 5-C 5054.5 i 1.49 5053.0 5-A 5105.0 2343.9 0.91 5194.1 -2.15% -2.18% -0.03% 5053.0 5-C 5054.5 1.49 820.3 I 5-D 5102.7 0.21 -2.80% -2.90% I -0.10% 5102.5 5-B 5079.7 1.05 5073.7 5-E 5100.4 I r 737.9 1.07 5099.3 -2.80% -2.80% 0.00% 5-B 579,7 1.05 5078.7 CONCLUSIONS: 1. For settlement analysis, the maximum final slope after differential settlement presents the critical slope for leachate flow after closure of the landfill. Differential settlement in the landfill results in a decrease in the slope of the leachate collection trench of 0.02%, resulting in a maximum final slope of -2.17% between points 5-A and 5-B. Additionally, differential settlement along the floor grades yields no increase in the critical slope. /:115\1538880\0400\0402 EDOP DFT NOV16\Appendix C_Engineering Calculations\C-4 - Consolidation\App C-4_Settlement Cale 18NOV16.xlsx Primed By: ALEBrown Data 2016-11-1@ T me:9:2-0 55 AM File Name: 1538880BO03.dwg I Last Etitec By: alebrown Date: 2015-11-17 Tirne:7:19:34 PM Path: "ilDemeergalderigds'acathl i153@880APRODUCTION.8 - Figur s'i LEGEND NOTES 5280 EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY (SEE NOTE 1) PROPOSED LINER SUBGRADE PROPERTY BOUNDARY (SEE NOTE 4) USR 1527 BOUNDARY EXISTING LIMIT OF WASTE (UNIT 1) CRITICAL LEACHATE FLOW PATH 1. EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY IS ACOMPOSITE OF AEROMETRIC INC. PHOTOGRAPHY DATED JANUARY 26, 2012 AND MILLER CREEK AERIAL MAPPING PHOTOGRAPHY DATED FEBRUARY 21; 2016. 2. EXISTING CONTOUR INTERVAL IS 2 FEET BASED ON NAVD88 ELEVATIONS. 3. COORDINATE SYSTEM ISIN NAD27 STATE PLANE COLORADO NORTH. CLI ENT WASTE MANAGEMENT DISPOSAL SERVICES OF COLORADO, INC. CONSULTANT YYYY-MM-DD 2016-11-1B DESIGNED ALB PREPARED ALB REVIEWED JAR APPROVED MEM 0 200 400 1" = 400' FELT PROJ ECT NORTH WELD LANDFILL, UNIT 2 SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO TITLE CRITICAL LEACHATE FLOW PATHS PROJECT NO.. 1538880 -1 I IF THIS MEASUREMENT DOES NOT MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN. THE SHEETSIZE HAS BEEN MODIFIED FROM: ANSI @ APPENDIX C-5 SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS Golder Associates CALCULATIONS Date: November 18, 2016 Made by: ALB Project No.: 1538880 Checked by: JAR Site Name: North Weld Landfill Unit 2 EDOP Reviewed by: MEM Subject APPENDIX C-5: GLOBAL SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS 1.0 OBJECTIVE Evaluate the global stability of the proposed Unit 2 at North Weld Landfill (NWLF) at initial construction, intermediate development, and final closure conditions. Initial cell construction excavation slopes within Unit 2 are modeled at the maximum design slope of 3H:1V. The step in liner grades between Phases 4 and 5 of Unit 2 are modeled at the design slope of 2H:1 V. Intermediate filling conditions are modeled at 3H:1V. Final closure conditions are modeled at the final design slopes of 4H:1V with a 5% crown slope. .0 METHODOLOGY Five cross -sections representative of various operational conditions expected throughout the development of Unit 2 were evaluated for global slope stability analysis, These cross sections represent anticipated worst -case conditions from a slope stability perspective throughout the operational life of Unit 2. General limit equilibrium (GLE) slope stability analyses were performed using Spencer's method in Slide 7.0 (RocScience 2016), a slope stability modeling software platform commonly considered as the standard of practice for slope stability analyses of earthen structures such as landfills. Spencer's method considers both moment and force equilibrium for a range of interslice shear -normal force conditions. It is common geotechnical practice to analyze the stability of embankment slopes using limit equilibrium methods. The NWLF is not located in a seismic impact zone defined in the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) "Regulations Pertaining to Solid Waste Sites and Facilities," 6 CCR 1007-2, Part 1 as amended November 17, 2015 (Regulations) as an area with a 10% percent or greater probability that the maximum horizontal acceleration in lithified earth material, expressed as a percentage of the earth's gravitational pull (g), will exceed 0.109 in 250 years. Therefore, slope stability analyses were only run for static conditions. For all five cross -sections, results from circular and block slip surfaces were compared to determine the failure mode and surface with the lowest factor of safety. 511538880\040010402 edop dft noel 6\appendix c engineering calculations\c-5 - slope stabilitytapp c-5 gs 18novl6.dacx Golder Associates Inc. 44 Union Boulevard, Suite 300 Lakewood, CO 80228 USA Tel: (303) 980-0540 Fax: (303) 985-2080 www.golder.com Golder Associates: Operations in Africa, Asia, Australasia, Europe, North America and South America Golder, Golder Associates and the GA globe design are trademarks of Golder Associates Corporation GLOBAL SLOPE STABILITY CALCULATIONS Page 2 of 4 Project No.: 1538880 Made by: ALB Site Name: North Weld Landfill Checked by: JAR ofe... Date: November 18, 2016 Reviewed by: MEM 2.1 Geometry Five cross -sections were analyzed for global slope stability analyses, as shown in Figure 1 and summarized below: • Section A: cross-section cut through the maximum depth of excavation (i.e., longest excavation slope) required for liner construction II Section B: cross-section cut in a north -south alignment through an intermediate filling condition in Phase 4 that terminates at the 2H:1V step between the liner systems of Phases 4 and 5 • Section C: cross-section cut in an east -west alignment through an intermediate filling condition in Phase 4 ■ Section D: cross-section cut through the maximum thickness of waste (i.e., maximum driving force) ■ Section E: cross-section cut through maximum permitted waste grades at the location of minimum height of the perimeter berm (i.e., minimum resisting force) 2.2 Assumptions Slope stability analyses were based on the following assumptions: • Factors of safety were computed using Spencer's Method of Slices (Spencer 1967). ■ The critical slip surface for all conditions was assumed to be circular. Circular analysis slip surfaces were drawn using a random search routine to locate the critical failure surface (the failure surface yielding the lowest factor of safety). • The search was restricted to slip surfaces that would result in a significant failure of the embankment (i.e., sloughing of the slopes was neglected). • Material properties for in situ materials, liner system materials, and alternative final cover materials (including shear strength parameters and unit weights) were based on the results of consolidated undrained (CU) triaxial shear strength tests (ASTM D4767) and direct shear tests (ASTM D3080) performed on relatively undisturbed or recompacted soil samples collected during the site characterization field investigation. • Groundwater elevations were based on maximum inferred elevations from temporary monitoring well readings collected by Swift River Environmental Services, LLC on May 3-4, 2016. ■ Only groundwater elevations from temporary wells screened within shallow alluvial deposits of gravelly sands and sandstones encountered between the alluvium and the Laramie Formation and within the discontinuous water -bearing sands and lignite seams within the Laramie formation were considered in stability analyses. Groundwater elevations from the regional confined aquifer within the Fox Hills Formation were not considered due to depth (i.e., greater than 50 ft bgs). IN Minimum allowable factors of safety were defined as follows: Short-term conditions (excavation and intermediate fill): 1.30 • Long-term conditions (final closure): 1.50 i;\15\1538880\0400\0402 edop d{t novl6\appendix c_engineering caiculations\c-5 - slope stability4app c-5 gas 18nov1adocx e Golder Associates GLOBAL SLOPE STABILITY CALCULATIONS Page30f4 Project No: 1538880 Made by: ALB Site Name: _ North Weld Landfill Checked by: JAIL 'sr_ Date: November 18, 2016 Reviewed by: MEM • 2.3 Material Properties Mohr -Coulomb drained shear strength parameters were derived for all materials as summarized in Table 1. Table 1: Shear Strength Parameters Material Static Analysis Total Unit Weight (pcf) Friction Angle (°) Cohesion (psf) In Situ Material (Alluvium) 122 25 0 Engineered Fill 122 29 0 Compacted Cohesive Soil Liner 120 26 905 Granular Drainage Material 120 34 0 Protective Layer — 25 0 122 Municipal Solid Waste 65 33 0 Daily and Intermediate Cover 122 i 25 0 Alternative Final Cover 120 29 157 Shear strength properties were based on the following geotechnical laboratory testing reported in the Report of Geotechnical Investigation, North Weld Landfill Unit 2, Permitting and Development (Swift River 2016): • Shear strength properties for in -situ alluvial material, protective layer materials, and daily/intermediate cover materials were based on a 3 -point isotropically consolidated undrained (CI U) triaxial shear strength test (ASTM D4767) of a relatively undisturbed soil sample collected from boring NWE-14 between 17 and 19 ft bgs. • Shear strength parameters for engineered fill material were based on a direct shear test (ASTM D3080) of a bulk sample collected from test pit TP-3 between 3 and 5 ft bgs and remolded to 85% maximum dry density and 25% below optimum moisture content. No cohesion was assumed to maintain conservativeness. • Shear strength properties for the compacted cohesive soil liner were based on a direct shear test (ASTM D3080) of a bulk sample collected from test pit TP-2 between 5 and 9 ft bgs and remolded to 97% maximum dry density and 2.5% below optimum moisture content. • Shear strength properties for granular drainage material were referenced from typical soil characteristics (Lindeburg 2008). • Shear strength properties for municipal solid waste (MSW) were referenced from published data (Kavazanjian et al 1995). The unit weight of MSW was based on commonly accepted values assuming good compaction and/or waste settlement. • Shear strength parameters for alternative final cover material were based on a direct shear test (ASTM D3080) of a bulk sample collected from test pit TP-3 between 3 and 5 ft bgs and remolded to 85% maximum dry density and 2.5% below optimum moisture content. i:1154158888O\O40O1O402 edop dft novl64appendix c_engineering calculations\c-5 - slope stabilitylapp c-5 gs 18nov16.docx Golder Associates GLOBAL SLOPE STABILITY CALCULATIONS Page 4of4 Project No.: 1538880 Made by: ALB Site Name: North Weld Landfill Checked by: JAR Date: November 18, 2016 Reviewed by: _ MEM 3.0 RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS Results of the slope stability analyses are summarized in Table 2. The results are also illustrated graphically in the attached Slide output figures. The figures depict the most critical slip surfaces and computed minimum factors of safety for the cross -sections evaluated. For each section, circular slip surfaces yielded lower safety factors than block slip surfaces. Table 2: Summary of Analyses and Computed Minimum Factors of Safety Cross -Section Operational Condition Factor of Safety Section A Excavation 1.41 Section B Intermediate Fill 1.95 Section C , Intermediate Fill 1.95 Section D Final Closure 1.69 Section E Final Closure 2.10 The minimum factors of safety calculated against static stability failure were found to be above the targeted factors of safety and are therefore considered stable for all cross sections and operational conditions evaluated. 4.0 REFERENCES Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE). 2015. Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division. Part 1 — Regulations Pertaining to Solid Waste Disposal Sites and Facilities, 6 CCR 1007-2. Amended November 17. Kavazanjian, E. Jr., N. Matasovic, R. Bonaparte, and G.R. Schmertmann. 1995. Evaluation of MSW Properties for Seismic Analysis. Geoenvironment 2000 2:pp. 1126-1141. Lindeburg, M.R. 2008. Civil Engineering Reference Manual for the PE Exam. 11th ed. RocScience. 2016. Slade Version 7.020. Build date: October 27, 2016. Spencer, E. 1967. A Method of Analysis of the Stability of Embankments Assuming Parallel Inter -Slice Forces. Geotechnique Vol. XVII, 1:pp. 11-26. Swift River Environmental Services, LLC (Swift River). 2016. Report of Geotechnical Investigation, North Weld Landfill Unit 2, Permitting and Development. June. United States Geological Survey (USGS). 2014, Interactive Fault Map. Available online: http:llearthquake.usgs.Qovlhazardslgfaultslmap/#hazfaults2o14 (accessed August 12, 2016). 1:11511538880\040010402 edop oft novi6\appendix c_engineering calcuiationsle-5 - slope stability\app c-5 gs 18novl6.docx Golder Associates FIGURES Peth: l` Denver.galder gds'ocadt15 153B880''I'RODUCTION B - Figuresk File Name: 1538880B001.d'n'g I Last @citec By: alebrown Date: 2010-11-17 Time:6:34 02 PM Primed By: ALEBrown Date: 201@-11-17 T me:G:37:42 PM LEGEND NOTES 5280 EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY (SEE NOTE 1) PROPOSED LINER SUBGRADE PROPERTY BOUNDARY (SEE NOTE 4) USR 1527 BOUNDARY EXISTING LIMIT OF WASTE (UNIT 1) EXISTING FENCE 1. EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY IS ACOMPOSITE OF AEROMETRIC INC. PHOTOGRAPHY DATED JANUARY 26, 2012 AND MILLER CREEK AERIAL MAPPING PHOTOGRAPHY DATED FEBRUARY 21; 2016. 2. EXISTING CONTOUR INTERVAL IS 2 FEET BASED ON NAVD88 ELEVATIONS. 3. COORDINATE SYSTEM ISIN NAD27 STATE PLANE COLORADO NORTH. CLIENT WASTE MANAGEMENT DISPOSAL SERVICES OF COLORADO, INC. CONSULTANT YYYY-MM-DD 2016-11-11 DESIGNED ALB PREPARED ALB REVIEWED JAR APPROVED MEM 0 200 1" = 400' 400 FELT PROJ ECT NORTH WELD LANDFILL, UNIT 2 SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO TITLE SLOPE STABILITY SECTION MAP PROJECT NO. 1538880 CONTROL REV. A FIGURE 1 IF THIS MEASUREMENT DOES NOT MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN, THE SHEETSIZE HAS BEEN MODIFIED FROM: ANSI @ — - Safety Factor 0.00 - 0.5 a unit Weight Cohesion Phi Material Name Color Strength Type ci- 1.00 Ib ft� (psf (deg) iz- in - 1. 5 0 In -Situ Material - 122 Mohr -Coulomb 0 25 - (Alluvium) - a v - Engineered Fill 122 Mohr -Coulomb 0 29 -. .. } 3.00 - - 3.50 P 0o co "' - 4.00 1.41 4.50 - 5.00 5.50 6.00+ O J in Lo - I O O r O u ! O C�R� 1O - I I I I I I I I I I I I -300 -200 -100 I I I I I I I I I II I I I 0 100 200 300 400 500 till kedbal li tt 5LIDEINTERPRET 7.Dzo Project North Weld Landfill - Unit 2 Expansion Analysis Description Slope Stability - Section A - Excavation Drawn By ALB Scale 1:1000 Company Golder Associates Date 11/2/2016 9:52:27 AM File Name Excavation Section.slim n. sl i m - Safety Factor - 0.00 Unit Weight CohesionType Cohesion Phi 0 Material Name Color .50 Ibsf ft3} (psf) (deg) 1.010 In -Situ Material o - 0 1.50 (Alluvium) 122 Mohr -Coulomb 0 25 co in f 00 Engineered Fill 122 Mohr 0 29 . -Coulomb .{_.. i 0 Compacted Cohesive 120 Mohr 905 26 -Coulomb Soil Liner �,.�... I , . 0 Granular Drainage 3.5 0 Material 120 Mohr -Coulomb 0 34 - 4 0 0 Protective Layer 122 Mohr 0 25 CD . ■ -Coulomb 1.95 CD up 4 5 0 . Municipal Solid 65 Mohr -Coulomb 0 33 Waste 5 0 0 . 5.50 I J 6 00+ . d 0 i u o o i i , ! i i f I ti , i ! i I ii I - i I am. I CiTh r- v O 0 0 01 In o I1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I I I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I I 1 I 1 I 1 I t 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 111111 Assail Sta-At IdlUi Or 014111 a - 5LIDEINTERPRET 7.DZD Project North Weld Landfill - Unit 2 Expansion Analysis Description Slope Stability - Section B - Intermediate Fill Drawn By ALB Scale 1:2000 Company Golder Associates Date 11/2/2016 9:52:27 AM File Name Intermediate Section B.slim Safety Factor 0.00 0.50 0- 0 1.50 Unit Weight CohesionType '° hesion Phi Name Color 2.0 0 - I Material (Ibsfft3) (psf) (deg) _L''95 2.50 \ � - In -Situ Material 122 Mohr 0 25 -Coulomb 3 0 0 co . to - (Alluvium) Compacted Cohesive 3 5 0 = 120 Mohr -Coulomb 905 26 - . Soil Liner - - 4.00 = Granular Drainage Material 120 Mohr -Coulomb 0 34 4 50 - — . - - Municipal Solid ■ 65 Mohr -Coulomb 0 33 5.00 0 0 Waste co 5.50 6.00+ 0- 0 it to - \\\ \\\ o 0 cc, 0 u 41, Crr;TCJ. + rr.- (NI In - --`.TTlrl L FLial [Dtry 1tr cola aI lJ n O u` -LT -cT Q7 0 0 In - d 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 0 200 400 600 800 1000 I I I I I I 1 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 Pal CI I tt 5LIDEINTERPRET 7.Dzo Project North Weld Landfill - Unit 2 Expansion Analysis Description Slope Stability - Section C - Intermediate Fill Drawn By ALB Scale 1:2400 Company Golder Associates Date 11/2/2016 9:52:27 AM File Name Intermediate Section A.slirn _ Safety Factor 0.00 - - 0.50 O - c— 1.00 1.50 C, Unit Phi Material Name Color Weight Strength Strength Type Cohesion _ _ 5 :: (psf) deg ) O- 3. 0 0 In -Situ Material Q- 122 Mohr -Coulomb 0 25 0 (Alluvium) cQ_ 3.50 - Engineered Fill 122 Mohr -Coulomb 0 29 4.00 _ — 4.50 Compacted Cohesive 120 Mohr -Coulomb 905 26 Soil Liner _ 5.00 Granular Drainage O - 120 Mohr -Coulomb 0 34 Material _ Lo _ 5.50 6.00+ Protective Layer 1 122 Mohr -Coulomb 0 25 _ — Municipal Solid Waste 65 Mohr -Coulomb 0 33 - Alternative Final Cover 120 Mohr -Coulomb 157 29 o- 0 in Lo _ 1.69 sp- in � - S Y In_,, l _ — 1 1 _ t t, Cl O O �I I �I T -ii cisana �1 VVJ y, f{� �.�rr' ____41,_ c onp cooCoon o- 0 O up_ II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -200 a 200 400 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 Nail toss ariel imp) lit SLIDEINTERPRET 7.D20 Project North Weld Landfill - Unit 2 Expansion Analysis Description Slope Stability - Section D - Final Closure: Maximum Waste Drawn By ALB Scale 1:3000 Company Golder Associates Date 11/2/2016 9:52:27 AM File Name Max Waste Section.slim Safety Factor - - 0.00 - 0.50 1.00 0_ 0 0 1.50 Unit Weight Cohesion Phi - �" _ Material Name Color Strength Strength Type Psf) (deg) j' - - �'' In -Situ Material 122 Mohr 25 - (Alluvium) -Coulomb 3.00 o- 3 50 Engineered Fill 122 Mohr -Coulomb 0 29 . - 4.00 Compacted Cohesive - Soil Liner 120 Mohr -Coulomb 905 26 5 0 . — Granular Drainage 120 Mohr 0 34 - Material -Coulomb 5.00 - 5.50 Protective Layer ■ 122 Mohr -Coulomb 0 25 , 2.1.0 0 in- x.00+ Municipal Solid Waste 65 Mohr -Coulomb 0 33 Alternative Final Cover 120 Mohr -Coulomb 157 29 0 -gcr in - - 1� r 1 1 i i I f 0/ �1•i,/ i In - • i I L� I; fan(J 1 n. • 0 0 V / - I III I " " I I " " " I " " " I I " " I " I " I " " I I " " " I " I " I I I " I " I " I " I I I " I " I " I " I I " " I " I " I " I I I " " " I " " " I I " " I " I " I " " I I " " " I " " " I I " " 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 tell Iii. N kesi kit IFICA Or • le a - 5LIDEINTERPRET 7.Dzo Project North Weld Landfill - Unit 2 Expansion Analysis Description Slope Stability - Section E - Final Closure: Minimum Berm Drawn By ALB Scale 1:2400 Company Golder Associates Date 11/2/2016 9:52:27 AM File Name Min Buttress Section.slim APPENDIX C-6 SOIL EROSION POTENTIAL EVALUATION Golder Associates CALCULATIONS Date: Project No.: Site Name: Subject: APPENDIX C-6: EROSION POTENTIAL CALCULATION November 18, 2016 1538880 North Weld Landfill Unit 2 ED0P Weld County, Colorado Made by: MBR Checked by: PDS 7P5 Reviewed by: JAR 4._ 1.0 OBJECTIVES Estimate the average annual soil loss due to erosion for the alternative final cover design of Unit 2 of North Weld Landfill (NWLF), A maximum soil loss tolerance is not specified in the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) "Regulations Pertaining to Solid Waste Sites and Facilities," 6 OCR 1007-2, Part 1' . Therefore, for the purposes of this calculation, a soil loss of 5.0 tons/acre/year due to erosion was considered an acceptable and conservative soil loss rate. This maximum soil loss rate is based on the regulatory soil loss tolerance for landfill final cover slopes in the state of Nebraska. 2.0 METHODOLOGY Erosion was evaluated using the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation, Version 2 (RUSLE2) erosion modeling software (USDA 2010). Two analyses were performed on a profile of the alternative final cover with the greatest slope length: • Short-term analysis for the first year of vegetative growth to model how the water balance cover will respond during the first year of closure, ■ Long-term analysis for a five-year period of vegetative growth on the water balance cover. The profile of the final cover analyzed consisted of a 570 -foot -long crown slope at a 5% grade, a 570 -foot -long side slope at a 41-1:1:V slope, and 2 mid -slope bench channels. 3.0 ASSUMPTIONS The following is a list of general input parameters and assumptions used for the RUSLE analysis: ■ The on -site soils to be used for the water balance final cover are expected to consist of surficial eolian deposits within the Unit 2 was footprint to be excavated and stockpiled during unit development. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Web Soil Survey (NRCS 2016, provided in Attachment 1) indicates that the soils within the Unit 2 waste disposal footprint predominantly consist of Olney fine sandy loam at varying slopes between 1 and 5%. The soil properties associated with Olney fine sandy loam, 0 to 6% slopes, Olney fine sandy loam 85%, were assumed in the RUSLE analysis. ■ It was assumed that mulch will be applied to the final cover surface at a rate of 2 tons/acre at the time of seeding. i:\15\153888010400\0402 edop rift nov161appendix e_`engineering calculations\c-6 - rusie\app c-6 rusle2 18nov16.doex Golder Associates Inc. 44 Union Boulevard, Suite 300 Lakewood, CO 80228 USA Tel: (303) 980-0540 Fax: (303) 985-2080 www.goider.com Golder Associates: Operations in Africa, Asia, Australasia, Europe, North America and South America Golder, Golder Associates and the GA globe design are trademarks of Golder Associates Corporation EROSION POTENTIAL (RUSLE) CALCULATIONS Page 2of2 i Project No.: 1538880 Made by: MBR R Site Name: North Weld Landfill Checked by: PDS orge Date: November 18, 2016 Reviewed by: JAR ■ It was assumed that seeding will take place in April of the first year following final cover construction. Construction activities prior to seeding will include: bulldozer filling and leveling; soil disking, tandem light finishing; and spike tooth harrow. • Weld County is located in Crop Management Zone (CMZ) 05. Vegetation for CMZ 05 is assumed to be modeled as a generic cool season grass mixture with a yield of 1.5 ton/acre. 4.0 CALCULATIONS RUSLE2 computes average annual soil loss on the ith day as follows; ai=r'txkix!1xSxczixpi where: ai = average annual soil loss for the ith day (tons/acre /year) r; - erosivity factor for the ith day = soil erodibility factor for the fib day 1 = soil length factor for the ith day S — steepness factor for the ith day = cover -management factor for the ith day pi — supporting practice factor for the ith day The average annual soil loss is computed as: where: a, = average annual soil loss for the ith day (tons/acre/year) rr = number of years in the analysis A= average annual soil loss (tons/acre/year) 5.0 CONCLUSIONS The inputs and output files from the RUSLE2 software for the first -year analysis are presented in Attachment 2 and the long-term analysis is presented in Attachment 3. The predicted soil loss due to erosion in the first year is 2.9 tons/acre/year and long-term is 1.4 tons/acre/year. Since the predicted soil loss is less than the maximum soil loss tolerance (5.0 tons/acre/year) the design of the water balance final cover is considered adequate to prevent excessive erosion. 6.0 REFERENCES National Resource Conversation Survey (NRCS). 2010.. Web Soil Survey of Weld County, Colorado, November 11. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 2010. RUSLE2 Version 2.0.4.0 Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE). 2015. Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division. Part 1 -- Regulations Pertaining to Solid Waste Disposal Sites and Facilities, 6 CCR 1007-2. Amended November 17. 1:\15\1538880\0400\0402 edop dit novl6tappendix c_ engineering calculationstc-6 - rusle\app c-6 rusle2 18nov16_docx Golder Associates ATTACHMENT I NRCS SOIL MAP - WELD COUNTY, COLORADO 4QO 36' 36" N 400 34' 13" N 8 0 0 rn vsn 8 en airn 8 rn 104° 50' 38" A 104° 50' 38" U N A K Factor, Rock Free —Weld County Colorado, Southern Part (NWLF K Factor) Map Scale: 1:21,400 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet 0 300 600 1200 Meters 1800 Feet 0 1000 2000 4000 6000 Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: W1S84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 13N WC584 104° 48' 17"'!k 516400 0 en 8 4QO 36' 36" N 40c 34'1B"N USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey a- Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey 11/11/2016 Page 1 of 4 K Factor, Rock Free -Weld County: Colorado, Southern Part (NWLF K Factor) MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (A01) Area of Interest (A01) Soils Soil Rating Polygons . 02 u u . 05 . 10 . 15 . 17 . 20 . 24 . 28 . 32 . 37 . 43 . 49 . 55 . 64 Not rated or not available Soil Rating Lines - .02 .05 AI 0 .10 .15 a 0 .17 A 0 .20 .24 A 0 .28 A 0 .32 0 .37 .43 ~ .49 .55 .64 A 0 Not rated or not available Soil Rating Points .02 .05 0 . 10 . 15 O .17 p� .20 S . 24 O .28 .32 O .37 O .43 ■I .49 .I .55 0 .64 Not rated or riot available Water Features Transportation # I F Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Aerial Photography Streams and Canals The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map ntieasurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey U RL: http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857 ) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS RCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part Survey Area Data: Version 14, Sep 22, 2015 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Apr 22, 2011 Oct 19, 2011 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey dall. Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey 11/11/2016 Page 2 of 4 K Factor, Rock Free Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part NWLF K Factor K Factor, Rock Free K Factor, Rock Free— Summary by Map Unit — Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part (CO618) Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOl 4 Aquolls flooded and Aquepts, 16.3 0.8% 13 Cascajo gravelly sandy loam, 5 to 20 percent slopes .15 6.5 0.3% 31 Kim loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes .28 17.6 0.9% 32 Kim loam, 1 to 3 percent. slopes .28 282.2 14.4% 33 Kim loam„ 3 to 5 percent slopes .28 23.3 1.2% 34 Kim loam, 5 to 9 percent slopes .28 64.2 3.3% 47 Olney fine sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes .24 465.7 23.8% 48 Olney fine sandy loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes .24 968.2 49.4% 51 Otero sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes .15 42.4 2.2% 62 Otero sandy loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes .15 23.0 1.2% 53 Otero sandy loam, 5 to 9 percent slopes .15 50.3 2.6% 76 Vona sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes .20 0.5 0.0% Totals for Area of Interest 1,960.2 100.0% Description Erosion factor K indicates the susceptibility of a soil to sheet and rill erosion by water. Factor K is one of six factors used in the Universal Soil Loss Equation (ISLE) and the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RULE) to predict the average annual rate of soil loss by sheet and rill erosion in tons per acre per year. The estimates are based primarily on percentage of silt, sand, and organic matter and on soil structure and saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksat). Values of K range from 0.02 to 0.69. Other factors being equal, the higher the value, the more susceptible the soil is to sheet and rill erosion by water. "Erosion factor Kf (rock free)" indicates the erodibility l ity of the fine -earth fraction, or the material less than 2 millimeters in size. USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey 11/11/2016 Page 3 of 4 K Factor, Rock Free Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part NWLF K Factor Rating Options Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Component Percent Cutoff. None Specified Tie -break Rule: Higher Layer Options (Horizon Aggregation Method): Surface Layer (Not applicable) USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey 11/11/2016 Page 4 of 4 ATTACHMENT 2 RUSLE2 EROSION CALCULATION RECORD YEARN USDA Manual iCanlnwatlDn RUSLE2 Profile Erosion Calculation Record Info: File: profiles\North Weld Year 1 In uts: Location: USA\Colorado\Weld County\CO_Weld_R_16-13 Soil: Weld County, Colorado, Northern Part\44 Olney fine sandy loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes\Olney Fine sandy loam 85% Slope length (horiz): 1100 ft Avg. slope steepness: 15 % Management Vegetation Yield units # yield units, #/ac managements\CMZ 05\c.Other Local Mgt Records\North Weld check Grass, cool season, spring seeded ton 1.5 Contouring: b. absolute row grade 0.5 percent Strips/barriers: (none) Diversion/terrace, sediment basin: diversion/terrace system defined by user in profile Subsurface drainage: (none) Adjust res. burial level: Normal res. burial Outputs: T value: 5.0 t/ac/yr Soil loss erod portion: 3.3 tlac/yr Detachment on slope: 3.3 t/ac/yr Soil loss for cons. plan: 2.9 t/ac/yr Sediment delivery: 0.16 t/ac/yr Crit. slope length: 700 ft Surf. cover after planting: 90 % Date Operation Vegetation Surf. res. coy. after op, % 4/1 /0 Bulldozer, filling/leveling 0 4/21/0 _ Disk, tandem light finishing 0 4/21/0 Harrow, spike tooth 0 4/22/0 Drill or airseeder, double disk Grass, cool season, spring seeded 90 4/22/0 Add mulch 90 4/22/0 Mulch crimper 90 ATTACHMENT 3 RUSLE2 EROSION CALCULATION RECORD YEAR 5 USDA Manual iCanlnwatlDn RUSLE2 Profile Erosion Calculation Record Info: File: profiles\North Weld Long Term In uts: Location: USA\Colorado\Weld County\CG_Weld_R_16-16 Soil: Weld County, Colorado, Northern Part\44 Olney fine sandy loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes\Olney Fine sandy loam 85% Slope length (horiz): 1100 ft Avg. slope steepness: 15 °!o Management Vegetation Yield units # yield units, #/ac managements\CMZ 05\c.Other Local Mgt Records\North Term Weld Long Grass, cool season, spring seeded ton 1.5 Contouring: b. absolute row grade 0.5 percent Strips/barriers: (none) Diversion/terrace, sediment basin: diversion/terrace system defined by user in profile Subsurface drainage: (none) Adjust res. burial level: Normal res. burial Outputs: T value: 5.0 tiac/yr Soil loss erod.portion: 1.6 t/aclyr Detachment on slope: '1.6 tlac/yr Soil loss for cons. plan: 1.4 t/ac/yr Sediment delivery: 0.061 tiac/yr Crit. slope length: 700 ft Surf. cover after planting: 40 % Date Operation Vegetation Surf. res. coy. after op, % 4/22/0 Begin growth Grass, cool season, spring seeded 40 Hello