HomeMy WebLinkAbout20192244.tiffINVENTORY OF ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION
Applicant Kerr McGee Gathering, LLC
Case Number USR19-0011
Submitted or Prepared
Prior to At
Hearing Hearing
1
SPO R. Olson, Letter
in Opposition
X
2
SPO J. Thomas Chandler, Letter
in Opposition
X
3
SPO L. Rieder, Letter in Opposition
X
4
SPO E. Rieder, Letter in Opposition
X
5
SPO T. Folker, Letter
in Opposition
X
6
SPO Nygren and Peppier,
Letter
in Opposition
X
7
SPO
Trust,
A. Rieder,
Letter
G.
in Opposition
Rieder,
T. Folker, Nygren Family Farms, Starck
Family
X
8
SPO Kelly & Tyler Brown, Letter
in Opposition
X
9
SPO C. Jett
and N. Stremme,
Letter
in Opposition
X
10
SPO Concerned Weld county
Landowners, Letter
in Opposition
X
11
Excerpt
from Latham
Gas Application
X
12
News article
X
13
Criteria
of Weld County
Code
presented
from
public testimony
X
14
Power Point
Presentation
from Applicant
X
I hereby certify that the items identified herein were submitted to the Department of Planning Services at
or prior to the scheduled Planning Commissioners hearing.
Chris Gathman, Planner
OLSON
a Colorado Limited Partnership
P.O. Box 86
Johnstown 80534
March 19, 2019
Weld County Department of Planning Services
1555 N 17"' Ave
Greeley CO 80631
RE: Case # USR19-0011
(Compressor Station Facility)
Dear Planners
LP
I recently was very disturbed to learn that an Oil and Gas Support and Service
(Compressor Station Facility) was proposed on the border of Johnstown and the
gateway to our proper A facility of this magnitude affects not only those close
by (within 500 feet), but people and property miles away.
We realize such facilities are needed but this is the wrong location! This
proposed facility would be between our property and our access to 1-25 and
Johnstown. Even though we are a mile away, it will negatively affect the value of
our property due to concerns of light, noise, odors, traffic andthe inherent
dangers of inevitable chemical releases. Not to mention its relation to two
horizonal well pads which turns this lotion into the likes of an industrial park.
Also, CR 44 is in no position to handle the construction traffic and neither is CR
15.
Please note we are opposed to this proposed facility.
Sincerely
ree
Roger E Olson, Op Mgr of General Partner
i
S 04 bt %
r W 'Pr
I I l
EXHIBIT
jer
1,AsIClG -001
March 21, 2019
Planner: Chris Gathman
Weld County Department of Planning Services
1565 North 17th Avenue
Greeley, O 80631
RE Case I U R194)O1 I
Ken" McGee Gathering LLC
(Compressor Station Facility)
Dear Chris,
I am writing in response to the application for the Compressor Station Facility currently being
considered for approval by the Weld County Planning Department at the intersection of WCR
15 and WCR 44 near Johnstown. I am very disappointed to learn that an application for a
project of this magnitude, and with such a devastating impact on surrounding properties, can
move forward with notification to only property owners within 500 feet of the proposed site.
Our property's south boundary overlooks the project and is little more than a quarter mile away.
Your standards for notifications are inadequate and unfair. Expansion of the 500 foot boundary
wo u ld be we l comed .
Also, after reading the full application online, this proposed project. by Kerr McGee Gathering
appears to be a done deaf with the Weld County Department of Planning Services.
Construction has begun, equipment is being delivered, and new power poles have been
installed. All without a single meeting being conducted for the benefit of the surrounding
property owners no matter how close they are to the proposed site. Such behavior has had a
very negative impact on the neighborhood. I can only hope that .Kara McGee Gathering and
Weld County Planning don't continue down this path of inequity. It would truly be a travesty.
Thank you in advance for your consideration.
Sincerely,
J. Thomas Chandler
Manager
Chandler Farms Johnstown, LLC
7835 Eagle Ranch Road
Fort Collins, CO 80528
Pr
KID
Weld C
GI L L f
EXHIBIT
I, the undersigned, and Lawrence Grayson Rieder, by this letter oppose the proposed
Johnstown Compressor Station which would be built within 500 feet of our residence.
There arc well -documented hazards which accompany compressor stations such as
• Emissions: the release ofVOCs and NOx during "blow downs"
• Noise: upper 50-70 dBA which exceeds state and federal standards
• Safety; Explosions, fires, spills and fatalities in 24 states
Health: serious health problems for people living within. 2 miles
To elaborate:
Emissions commonly emitted include formaldehyde, benzene.,, hydrogen disulfide,
carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide and methane, to name a few.
The compressor stations run 24/2 and the noise can cause hearing impairment and
cardiovascular problems.
Since 2003 there have been 180 spills, evacuations, explosions, fires and fatalities in
24 states.
Health problems include bronchitis, decreased motor skills, pre cancerous lesions,
thyroid problems, nervous system impacts.
In addition to the extensive hazards, there are aesthetic issues —a high fence with
barbed wire plus loss or greatly diminished view of the mountains —and the seriously
reduced property value —difficult to impossible to ever be able to sell our property
which was valued at over half a million dollars three years ago.
I, the undersigned, Ernest Alexander Rieder, by this letter oppose the proposed
Johnstown Compressor Station which would be built within 500 feet of our residence.
There are welt -documented hazards which accompany compressor stations such as
• Emissions: the release of VOCs and NOx during "blow downs"
• Noise: tipper 50-70 dRAA which exceeds state and federal standards
• Safety: Explosions, fires, spills and fatalities in 24 states
• Health: serious health prYofilc rns (hr people living within 2 miles
To elaborate:
-Emissions commonly emitted include formaldehyde, benzene:, hydrogen disulfide,
carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide and methane, t.ci name, a few.
.
The Compressor stations run 2417 and iiie noise can cause hearing impairment and
cardiovascular problems.
Since 2003 there have been 180 spills, evacuations, explosions, fires and fatalities in
24 states.
I eai tl i problems include }bronchitis, decreased motor skills, pre -cancerous lesions,
thyroid problems, nervous system impacts.
in addition to the extensive hazards, there are aesthetic issues a high fence with
barbed wire plus loss or greatly diminished view of the mountains- and the seriously
reduced property value clifficult, to impossible, to ever he, able to sell our property
which was valued atover half a million dollars three "scars ago.
Teri Folker
6604 Weld County Road 44
Johnstown CO 80534
970-587-4317
March 20, 2019
Weld County Department of Planning Services
1555 N 17th Ave
Greeley, Co 80631
RE: Case# USR19-x}011
(Compressor Station Facility)
Dear Weld County Department of Planning Services:
My property is directly across the road from the proposed compressor station on county road 44.
This has been my home and place of business for the last twenty years. There are several people
who bring their horses over to rider in my arena regularly. After doing some research I have found
that this compressor station, being so close to me, will greatly decrease my property value, Not to
mention, the health hazards are very alarming for me, as well as, my animals, 1 fear my customers
may become very apprehensive about being around this area. There are also sub -divisions less than
one to two miles away and two Elementary Schools. The noise, traffic, emissions and psychological
effects are definite concerns for me, the animals, all my customers, neighbors and the entire
community as well.
l believe the oil and gas business is needed and is definitely an asset; but putting this compressor
station in such a populated area is riot where this facility should be placed. There are already two
large well sites on this same section of land, These sites have increased the noise and truck traffic
significantly and county road 44 is not a maintained road.
For the above reasons, and my close proximity to the site, I am strongly opposed to this proposed
station,
Sincerely,
11.
Teri Folker
EXHIBIT
�J
Am2tci 'oil
Weld County Department of Planning Services
Attn. Chris Gathman
1555 N. 17th Ave.
Greeley, CO 80631
Re: USR R 19-0011
Johnstown Compressor Station
Dear Chris and Weld County Commissioners,
My family and I are landowners in Section 19-4-67, directly south of the proposed compressor
station facility. Our property spans the hillside between County roads 15 and 13 directly south of the
proposed compressor station. (Within the 500 ft. notification area) My parents came to this section of
land in 1945 and I have lived on this section of land since the day I was born in 1953.
Over the years we have seen many changes in our community, Significant growth, both
residential and commercial, new schools, expanding boundaries of our once small town, and in more
recent years, a renewed amount of oil and gas exploration and pipelines. We have lived with, benefited
from, and supported these changes as progress to our area, but strongly disagree with the location of
the proposed Johnstown Compressor Station. A facility of this nature located so closely to existing
residences and future development is not compatible with this region. It borders the town of
Johnstown's municipal boundary and would have an enormous negative impact to this region. It lies
within the City ofJohnstown's Comprehensive Plan which in accordance with (Weld County Code.
Section 22-2-20 Policy 7,2) should also be considered.
We are very disappointed that only a mere handful of property owners within 500 ft. received
notification of such an irnpactful (USR) application. We have personally visited a similar facility in
Platteville, the Saint Vrain Compressor Station, before making this conclusion. We are opposed to the
far-reaching legislative regulations that are currently being proposed, but feel there is a definite
distinction between facilities of this nature and regular drilling/fracking sites, The impact of such a
facility will affect residents for miles. More rural and less populated areas outside of current
municipalities growth plans seem a logical and common-sense solution. This would alleviate public
concern and help protect individual property owners rights.
Furthermore, we question the compatibility of such a facility within this region. (Weld County
Code: Section 22-2-20 Policy 7.3) Concerns of constant noise, loud noise exceeding lawful requirements,
ground vibrations, odors, release of gasses and chemicals during blow -downs, lights, increased traffic,
(especially Rd. 44 which is almost impassible at times) are all inevitable consequences of the
construction and operation of such a facility. Chain link fencing with barbed wire surrounding the
facility, as described in the application, would resemble a prison. How could such a facility possibly be
considered compatible to this region considering its close proximity to existing and future residential
development? How could it not drastically devalue property in the immediate and surrounding area?
EXHIBIT
In
i,�c I --C.0
There are also farming and ranching activities in the immediate area. A horse arena directly
across the road on the Volker property and feedlot cattle Just west of this facility on the Starck property.
We all spend many hours outdoors working and enjoying outdoor activities. Additionally, this property
lies in a valley and traps dust and pollutants with an inversion effect which would certainly increase
ground emissions and dissipation of equipment being operated 24/7. Again, dangerously not
compatible with humans or animals in this region.
My family is not opposed to oil and gas and believe it is crucial to our county and country. As a
responsible steward of our personal land, we have worked closely with Kerr McGee/Anadarko on
projects located on our own property. We feel both parties have always handled this business in a
professional and mutually respectful manner. We have made mutual concessions to try and lessen the
impact on our property while still accommodating their development needs. We understand that such
facilities are necessary, but believe this is the wrong location.
Our ridge with rolling hills and prime development potential will be forever negatively and
economically impacted but much more we feel our neighbors and community will also be negatively
affected. They have not been given the appropriate notice to voice their concerns. We are trusting you
and our county commissioners to consider the negative impact on all concerned and deny this
application. We have lived, worked, and raised generations of families on this farm and within this
amazing community: It is too much a part of our heart, heritage, and future to not speak up.
Please note our objection to the granting of this project, Case # USR 19-0011.
Sincerely,
Mark and Julie Nygren
Che Peppler
Nygrek4LL
Farms, Ll1P,
20008 County Road 13
Johnstown, Colorado 80534
970-3024553Thygrenfarms@aol.com
March 22, 2019
Attention: Chris Cathman
Weld County Department of Planning Services
1555 N. 17th Ave,
Greeley, CO 80631
RE: Case # USR19-0011
Johnstown Compressor Station
Dear Weld County Planners and Commissioners,
on behalf of the following adjacent landowners within 500 hundred feet of Case #USR19-OO11
we unanimously oppose granting the Special Use Permit and building of the proposed Johnstown
Compressor Station. The magnitude of this type of facility, and the close proximity to the Town of
Johnstown and neighboring residents and subdivisions, would have a devastating impact to ourselves
and the surrounding community.
We feel this type of facility should not be applicable to the same requirements as horizontal
drilling and fracking of oil and gas. The impact and effects of this type of facility are far more reaching
than the regulatory distance of 500 ft. of homes currently required for drilling and fracking. Allowing
such facilities to operate so closely to homes and existing municipalities would set a dangerous
precedent and question the counties commitment to protect municipalities and rural citizens health,
safety, property rights, animal rights and general liberties. We understand the need for such facilities
and support the oil and gas industry, but believe more rural and less populated areas should be sought.
This parcel is much too small and would hinder bordering property owners+ everyday operations and
cause subsequent land devaluation.
We believe the inherent dangers of the chemicals and emissions that are released both
intentionally and unintentionally during the blowdown operations of such a facility and noise levels
much greater than the allowable 50-55dBA during such operational occurrences, should preclude this
location from consideration. Another important fact to consider is the topography of the site's location.
The river bottom land of the Little Thompson River is just north of the proposed site. Considerable
higher elevations and hills are located both south and east which create an inversion effect in the valley.
it is common when we have dry conditions, smoke, wind, and excessive traffic on the dirt roads to visibly
see and smell these pollutants. We are fearful this will negatively affect the normal and routine
dissipation of harmful emissions released by the operations at the site, Thus, negatively impacting air
quality for people and animals much greater than 500 ft.
1 oft
It is our understanding that only one previous meeting was held concerning this project. It
should be duly noted that not all residents and property owners within the required 500 ft. received
notice. Due to clerical errors in sending notifications to incorrect addresses, and some owners never
receiving the notices at all, we feel our due process of having our questions and concerns voiced prior to
approval has not been met. We haveread the proposed application which is by law a public document
and have numerous objections to pa rticu Fa r verbiage and content within. Additional concerns include
but are not limited to noise, odors, traffic, road hazards, health, safety, environmental impact, visual
impact, and unequivocal land value loss. We feel the permit is incomplete and does not satisfactorily
address some of these concerns.
We fear our homes, health, livestock, businesses, outdoor activities, and quality of life will be
significantly and irrevocably affected. Our hope is the county and applicant can work to find a more
suitable location.
For these reasons we oppose this location and thank you for your consideration to this matter.
Sincerely,
Alexander Rieder 21045 County Road 15
Johnstown, CO 80534
Grayson Feder
Ted Folker
\sista:
21045 County Road 15
Johnstown, CO 80534
PO Box 182
640Y &J7 gund 4-51
Johnstown, CO 80534
Nygren Family Farms, LIP 20008 County Road 13
Johnstown, CO 80534
Virginia RC1jw7L6
ta Family Trust 21746 County Road 13
Johnstown, Co 80534
2of2
Weld County Planning Services
1555 N 17th Ave
Greeley, CO 80631
Attn: Chris Gathman
Re: USR19-0012
Dear Chris,
We have received notice of a Use by Special Review (USR) application from Kerr McGee Gathering, LAX
for an oil and gas support facility (compressor station) in the Agricultural Zone District, Case #LISR19a
0011.
Our family has deep agricultural roots in Weld County; a homesteading family that for 5 generations has
lived and worked on a farm just south of the proposed facility. We respectfully ask that the Use by
Special Review Application be denied, not because we are anti -oil and gas development, but because
the proposed project Is not consistent with the existing or future uses of the adjoining properties. As a
concerned neighbor of this proposed facility, our opposition is supported by the following:
Inconsistent with the intent of the Weld County Code, Chapter 22 of the Comprehensive Plan
• Section 22-2-20 Policy 7.2. Conversion of agricultural land to nonurban residential„ commercial
and industrial uses should be accommodated when the subject site is in an area that can support
such development, and should attempt to be compatible with the region. The proposed facility
is NOT compatible with the region, The parcel is bordered by the municipal boundary for the
City of Johnstown, land that has been annexed into the City of Johnstown for residential
development. Further, the Pioneer Ridge development in the City of Johnstown is located just
over one mile from the proposed facility. Pioneer Ridge consists of hundreds of single family
residential homes and an elementary school with 615 students. Kerr McGee Gathering states in
their application "The proposed addition of a compressor station and laydown yard in this
location conserves land by eliminating the need for these facilities elsewhere in Weld County"
Clearly it is possiliPe for Kerr McGee to locate these facilities elsewhere in Weld County. Is the
proposed location, so close to existing and future residential development, truly compatible
with the region?
Section 22-2-20 Policy 7,3. Conversion of agricultural land to urban residential, commercial and
industrial uses should be considered when the subject site is located inside an Intergovernmental
Agreement area, Urban Growth Boundary area, Regional Urbanization Area or Urban
Development Nodes, or where adequate services are currently available or reasonably
obtainable. A municipality's adopted comprehensive plan should be considered, but should not
determine the appropriateness of such conversion, The location of the proposed facility is within
the City of Johnstown's comprehensive plan. In fact, this exact parcel was previously considered
for annexation by the City of Johnstown. Additionally, the project's proposed location Is in very
close proximity to numerous properties that have been annexed into the City of Johnstown for
10+ years. If approved, this project will clearly devalue nearby properties and interfere meth
EXHIBIT
u&. C fC)() I
development of adjoining properties, alt of which were annexed into the City of Johnstown long
before Kerr McGee Gathering purchased the proposed location on May 17, 2018,
In your review of this USR application we respectfully request that you be guided by the principles of the
Weld County Comprehensive Plan, understanding the conditions of today, but also protecting the
current and future propel rights of nearby neighbors, allowing each of us to maintain our long-
established proper goats.
Please note our objection to this project and we look forward to maintaining the continued peaceful
enjoyment of our family farm.
Sincerely,
SS P
-�
tiff '-C 1st.
—
.r' , at
a
f 7. # •P
L f C _ `�.Jet
Kelly & Tyler Brown
Johnstown, CO 80534
kelIyb yo@hotmai !corn
March 22, 2019
Weld County Department of Planning Services
1555 N. 17Ave
Greeley, CO 80631
Re: Case USR19M011
Kerr McGee Gathering LLB
Proposed Project: UDR for Oil and Gas Support
And service (compressor station facility)
Location: CR. 44 and CR 15
We have some major concerns about the location of this
compressor station:
1. Location: This is located in the little Thompson River
Valley. The area is lower than the surrounding topography.
Inversions occur in this area frequently concentrating dust
from farming and county roads 44 and 42 for days at a
time. It is my understanding that the Blow -Down from
compressor stations release many chemicals into the air
which would add to this existing air pollution. Both my
husband (100°./o disabled Vietnam Veteran) and I are
suffering from lung disorders and are on oxygen. We live
approximately 1/d mile uphill from this proposed facility.
We are very concerned about the effect it will have on our
health. Research from reliable sources report many health
hazards.
2. Other residents: Two houses very close to site and Pioneer
Ridge and several proposed subdivisions are located on the
rim of this valley and will likely also be affected by these
inversions and the }pollution they concentrate.
3. Noise pollution: The facility has said noise pollution will
not exceed 50db. Will the Blow -downs exceed this level?
How often and at what time of day will these Blow -Downs
occur? How will noise pollution el air pollution "t?,
mitigated for these Blow -Dawns?
4. On struction phase: Currently tankers and other oil trucks
speed past our house on CR 15 at all hours of the night
bouncing over the Little Thompson Bridge. They damage
the bridge and are a hazard to us and animals. CR. 44 is
err ently dirt and narrow and dangerous under certain
conditions. What improvements to these roads will be made
for our safety and the safety of the construction vehicles
and employees during the construction phase?
5. Fire hazard: There are currently no fire hydrants in the area
and I am not aware of a waterline large enough to supply a
fire hydrant in the area. inhere is the nearest Fire
Department trained and staffed to fight the type of fire that
in worse case could occur, and where would they source
water?
6. Pimp erty values: Property values will be decrea5;e1 due to
people refusing to live near a compressor station that they
perceive to be noisy, polluting, dangerous and unattractive.
7. Other affect: Our personal enjoyment of the property I
purchased fourteen years ago after almost a year long
search will be reduced because it was purchased for its
views, low noise levels and solitude.
We will be expecting a response to our concerns prior to your
approval of this project, and request an open meeting where
these and the concerns of our neighbors can be discussed.
Charles Jett
Norma c:y-e1nme
21607 County Road 15
Johnstown, CO 80534
.970,•593-2519
Concerned Weld County Landowners
Mark Nygren
Cheryl Peppier
Ted Folker
Ron Starck
Alexander Rieder
Grayson Rieder
Tyler Brown
J. Thomas Chandler
Charles Jett
Norma Stremme
Roger Olson
March 27t, 2019
Weld County Department of Planning Services
Attn. Chris Gathman
1555 N. 17th Ave.
Greeley, CO 80631
RE: Case It USR19-o011
Dear Mr. Gathman,
Please find enclosed letters of concern on behalf of landowners within 500 feet, as well as other
landowners in the area who feel they would be affected by the proposed location of the Johnstown
Compressor Station, As a combined group and based on the limited information provided to us by
public notice, we strongly feel that the concerns outlined herein, and our request for action, are worthy
of consideration by the Department of Planning Services.
Please don't hesitate to reach out to us individually should you need more information or have
questions. Thank you in advance for your time and prompt attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
Concerned Weld County Land + wners
Signed and received by:
n this date of March 27, 2019
EXHIBIT
leReJ (AA- 3 A._
Sound Mitigation Plan
Anadarko Petroleum is committed to the community and their needs, as such we are proposing the
following items in an effort to minimize any additional noise impact from the proposed Latham Gas
Plant
All plant compressors have been designed to be enclosed in insulated metal buildings and are
electrically driven. This will eliminate typical engine or exhaust noise and minimize the contributing
noise from the compressor frame,
As a key part of the design basis for the plant, we have identified Weld County Noise requirements and
are committed through sound engineering practice to minimize any impact of incorrectly sized
equipment, contributing to high gas velocity and consequential noise levels.
In addition we are proposing to erect a 25' sound wall, minimizing noise pollution outside of the
proposed facility boundary.
In an effort to baseline the current noise levels of the area and assist us in the in the mitigation design,
we have taken noise readings in the vicinity of the plant's proposed location. This report's findings can
be provided if needed.
Visual Mitigation Plan
In an attempt to minimize the visual impacts of the proposed gas plant for the surrounding community,
we will be erecting a 25' sound wall that is aesthetically matching the soundings, We will also be
matching the color scheme of the facility to the BLM standard, Carlsbad Canyon Tan.
Light Mitigation Plan
Anadarko recognizes the lighting that is necessary for the safe operation of the plant is also a visual
annoyance to the surrounding community. To assist alleviating this issue, Anadarko proposes the
following action plan.
First and foremost, it is recognized that the light design basis will minimize the required lighting to the
extent that the plant can be safely operated during normal or upset conditions. To help define these
lighting requirements, we have designed in two separate categories:
1. ESSENTIAL Lighting System — Dusk -to -dawn lighting that provides a lower level of
illumination, but meets requirements for personnel safety, plant security, and basic
operation of the plant. This will be low elevation lighting along foot paths and common
accessed areas.
2. DEMAND Lighting System — Plant -operator -switched lighting that provides for increased
illumination on an area -by -area basis to provide for nighttime work activities as
required. Otherwise, Demand Lighting System will only be energized when needed,
All lighting will be engineering utilizing industry standards and aspects of the "dark sky's outdooir lighting
standard to avoid excessive illumination. Light fixtures will be specified and installed to minimize
EXHIBIT
outward light pollution. This will be accomplished with directional LED fixtures, fixtures aimed
downward, fixtures equipped with glare shields, as well as other common and accepted light mitigation
fixture installation strategies listed within the design basis.
The final piece of light mitigation Anadarko proposes has been previously mentioned, the 25# sound
wall. The defined Essential lighting system will largely include ground level, directional lighting. The wail
will provide additional obstruction to any undue light pollution.
Communications Plan
Anadarko/Kerr McGee has a Stakeholder Relations team dedicated to assisting community members
with concerns or questions.
This team is committed to providing the following communication during all phases of permitting,
construction and operations. As part of the proposed Communications Plan staff is available for
meetings upon request as well.
• Anadarko Colorado Response Line
• Notifications of upcoming activites
• Quarterly Check -in Meetings
• On-line Portal — Expected to be operational by end of Q1
t
Proposed Communication Timeline
Colorado Response Line
• Permitting Phase
Application Submittal
c Planning Commission Hearing date
Board of County Commissioners Hearing date
• Construction Phase
O Commencement of Construction
Commissioning Phase
o introduction for when natural gas is introduced to the facility
• Operations Phase
Stakeholder Relations Team Anadarko Colorado Response Line — 866-248-9577
a integrated Operations Center (IOC), Platteville, CO — 970-506-5980
■ Real-time remote monitoring of the facility
■ Staffed 24/7/365
■ Immediately pinpoints issues associated with field alerts and alarms
■ Enhances collaboration with local emergency response agencies
Introduction:
Good afternoon,
My name is Mark Nygren. My current address is 417 Settler Way, Johnstown Co. Our family
own and farm approximately 500 acres adjacent to the southern border of the proposed Johnstown
Compressor Station U R19-0011. I'd like to begin by thanking you for the opportunity to address the
proposed application and share our reasoning that the application be denied. On behalf of several of
the adjacent landowners, we would like to ask your permission to yield our combined time to myself, my
wife Juke, Ms. Folker, and Mr. Rieder. This should help to expedite and simplify our public comment
time. We respectfully, ask the Planning Commission and Board of Commissioners to use their own
codes, criteria, and written principles in this determination. We have highlighted those codes a n d
criteria that we feel are vitally important and have not been met, or may be impossible to meet, despite
all efforts by the applicant. We have included pertinent documents to accompany each criterion which
we feel are applicable.
Chapter 22-1440t a Planning Process
G. In order to ensure joint cooperation between citizens and professionals, the County will rely
upon the following five (5) principles:
I . The County will encourage citizen participation in the planning process.
2. The County will encourage and promote coordination and cooperation between federal, state
and local governmental entities charged with making decisions which significantly affect land uses
in unincorporated Weld County.
. The County will discourage inappropriate development in natural hazard areas and reduce
environmental degradation as much as possible.
4. The County will rely, in part, upon recommendations from referral agencies and professionals
in making recommendations on land use applications.
5. The County will cooperate with the land use applicant in evaluating the objectives of the
applicant and the options available to the applicant, while ensuring the health, safety and welfare
of County residents.
(Weld County Code Ordinance 2008-13)
EXHIBIT
Sec. 23-2-220. - Duties of Planning Commission.
A. The Planning Commission shall hold a hearing to consider the application for the Special
Review Permit. The public hearing may involve either the Special Review Permit application alone
or may include the review of concurrent applications under the COUNTY's provisions for Overlay
Districts Regulations in Article V and Floodplain Regulations in Article XI of this Chapter. The
Planning Commission shall provide recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners
concerning the disposition of the requested Special Review Permit. The Planning Commission
shall approve the request for the Special Review Permit only if it finds that the applicant has met
the standards or conditions of this Subsection A and Sections 23-2-240 and 23-2-250 of this
Division. The applicant has the burden of proof to show that the standards and conditions of this
Subsection A and Sections 23-2-240 and 23-2-250 are met. The applicant shall demonstrate:
1. That the proposal is consistent with Chapter 22 of this Code and any other applicable code
p ovi& n or ordinance in effect_
2. That the proposal is consistent with the intent of the district in which the USE is located.
, That the USES which would be permitted will be compatible with the existing surrounding land
USES.
4. That the USES which would be permitted will be compatible with future development of the
surrounding area as permitted by the existing zoning and with the future development as projected
by Chapter 22 of this Code or MASTER PLANS of affected municipalities.
. That the application complies with Articles V and XI of this Chapter if the proposal is located
within the Overlay District Areas or a Special Flood Hazard Area identified by maps officially
adopted by the COUNTY.
6. That if the USE is proposed to be located in the A (Agricultural) Zone District, the applicant has
demonstrated a diligent effort has been made to conserve PRIME FARMLAND in the locational
decision for the proposed USE.
7. That there is adequate provision for the protection of the health, safety and welfare of the
inhabitants of the NEIGHBORHOOD and the COUNT '. ec. 22-1-120. - Comprehensive Plan
guiding principles.
5/20/2019
Google Maps
Go gle Maps
Imagery O2019 Google, Map date O2019 Google 200 ft
https://www.google.comimapsi
40,3076555 -1 ,9268B45,693m/data=!3m1 !1e3
1/1
Criteria of Compatibility Not Met
Supporting Documentation:
Sited Codes: Section 22-2-20 Policy 7.2
Section 22-2-20 Policy 7.3
Letter from Town of Johnstown
Sec. 23-2-220 -Duties of Planning Commission
#1. That the proposal is consistent with Chapter 22 of this code and any other applicable
provision or ordinance in effect
#2. That the proposal is consistent with the intent of the district in which the use is located.
#3. That the USES which would be permitted will be compatible with the existing surrounding
land USES.
#4. That the USES which would be permitted will be compatible with future development of the
surrounding area as permitted by existing zoning and with the future development as projected
by Chapter 22 of this code or MASTER PLANS of affected municipalities.
Narrative:
Sited codes, Letter from Johnstown, and annexed and platted property owned by Frank and
Arlene Wind located along Road 15 directly East of proposed site clearly show the USES are not
currently compatible nor would they be compatible for the future development planned by a
municipality's (Town of Johnstown) adopted MASTER PLANS. Furthermore, the preservation of
river greenways/natural areas and trails along the Little Thompson River within 1200 ft. to the
north of projected compressor station would continue to maintain current bird and wildlife
habitat and be a much more fit for compatibility to the region.
Inconsistent with the in tent of the Weld County Code, Chapter 22 of the Comprehensive Plan
Section 22-2-20 Policy 72. Conversion of agricultural al land to n onur'bQn residential, commercial
and industrial uses should be accommodated when the subject site is in an area that can support
such development, and should attempt to be compatible with the region. The proposed facility
is NOT compatible with the region. The parcel is bordered by the municipal boundary for the
City of Johnstown, land that has been annexed into the City of Johnstown for residential
development. Further, the Pioneer Ridge development in the City of Johnstown is located just
over one mile from the proposed facility, pioneer Ridgeconsists of hundreds of single family
residential homes and an elementary school with 615 students. Kerr McGee Gathering states in
their application "The proposed addition of a compressor station and laydown yard in this
location conserves land by eliminating the need for these facilities elsewhere in Weld County".
Clearly it is possib'e for Kerr McGee to locate these facilities elsewhere in Weld County, is the
proposed location„ so close to existing and future residential development, truly compatible
with the region?
Section 22-2-20 Policy 7.3. Conversion of agricultural land to urban residential, commercial and
industrial uses should be considered when the subject site is located inside an Intergovernmental
Agreement area, Urban Growth Boundary area, Regional Urbanization Area or Urban
Development Nodes, or where adequate services are currently available or reasonably
obtainable. A municipality's adopted comprehensive pion should be considered, but should not
determine the appropriateness of such conversion. The location of the proposed facility is within
the City of Johnstown's comprehensive plant in fact, this exact parcel was previously considered
for annexation by the City of Johnstown. Additionally, the project's proposed location is in very
close proximity to numerous properties that have been annexed into the City of Johnstown for
10+ years, if approved, this project\Nils clearly devaLle nearby properties and interfere with
development of adjoining properties, all of which were annexed into the City of Johnstown long
before Kerr McGee Gathering purchased the proposed location on May 17, 2018.
C S littps iwwwwweirlexixssiniapsi
Apps ' ElectoraFtitnfrtfi If BOCC Public Meat:,
Legg
Fitter Swatches...,
R21
"compatible t E 2018 Agendas - We,,. El Happy Scnb. ( What is the besi sot„
Property information (97O) 4O365C
PRoPERTIP PORTAL Technical Support (970)400-4357
r 4114IiODRA sin. ...10144#!13)
•
a
Fl p(a n • SOO mar
Floodplain - 100 Year Zone A
Floodplain - 100 Year F1oodway
Floodplain - 1 DO Year Zone AE
Floodplain T 100 Year Zone At4
Floodplain - 100 Year Zone AO
�-- trnpartant farmlands of weed County
Prime tlrngated) - Panyilands of National
Importance
III irrigated Land (Not Mire)
HIPPotential Ofy cropland - Prime if
they Become irrigated
Laciardi
• 49 w
•
I.
4
Other bookmarks
4
. a
eke
t •.r_
t
Town of
0
— ' •..1
e - ri!'
s
.91
jr'_ L) :0_1t% '_t. } 11
April 25. 7019
Weld County Planning, Commissioners
and
Weld County Board ofCommissioners
00 Department of Planning Service
1?)D N. 17'' Ave
Greeley CO 80631
RE: USR194)011, 1 04)01 1. Kerr-McGee ,Johnstown Compressor Station
Commissioners.
0
y
nstown
The Town o ['Johnstown has reviewed the application for the proposed compressor station and
has significant concerns related to the location of this facility adjacent to our Town Limits. On
April 15, 2019, in a recent council meeting, residents offered public comment and expressed
concerns related to the application for this gas compressor station. On behalf of the Town
Council of Johnstown, and to ensure our residents; concerns are appropriately weighted into the
decision_ please consider this correspondence and enter in into the record as the County
considers the merits of this Use by Special Review application.
The Johnstown Comprehensive Plan Land Use Framework Plan indicates this area would be best
suited for low density residential neighborhoods, with a Village Center commercial node shown
at the corner of CR 13 and CR 44 and river catenwaysinntural areas and trails along the Little
Thompson River approximately = l200 feet to the north. The subject site is located in an area
anticipated for szgi ficaiu growth and development over time. within a one mile radius of the
facility. This proposed compressor station seems likely to have a lore -term adverse effect on the
development potential and intended uses of this area, per the Framework Non.
Noise & Air ualitg-.Numerous residents have reached out to the Town, voicing concerns about
the impact of sustained noise on their use of their homes and properties -- concerned they will no
to ner be able to sleep with windows open at night -- as well as the potential for odor issues and
unknown health concerns from the chemicals used and released into the air during processing.
The Town appreciates siting die facility where oil and gas operations are already in place, and
the acknowledgement by Kerr-McGee/Anadarko in the USR Narative that noise levels will need
to he continually monitored over time. and that there is a potential for additional noise mitigation
measures (walls, structures, advanced technology) to be considered and installed over time to
ensure appropriate noise levels. Town Staffwould urge a condition related to re ular testing of
noise levels to offset the potential health [inputs of prolonged exposure to noises Additional, the
Town requestsrequests1 condition that would require permanent continuous air quality monitoring, to
ensure emissions from the facility remain within allowed ranges and to address address any
anomalies immediately.
Traffic/Roadway. The Town would request a more detailed haul route. The email dated April 9,
2019, uploaded to the County's website as part of the application, indicates that CR 13 and CR
44 will be used, but does not fully address various routes and the potential impacts to nearby
roadways and intersections. Any routes that utilize or impact the Town's roadways will require
an executed Roadway Maintenance Agreement to ensure the roadways are maintained in a
satisfactory manner during construction, and returned to as-good#orrbetter condition thereafter.
The use of unpaved roads by heavy construction equipment and multiple oil and gas facilities
seems substandard for development that is occurring within the Town's Growth Management
Area, on a property that is currently eligible for annexation to the Town.
The Town's preference is for this station to be relocated to a more sustainable rural area, where
significant residential growth is not anticipated. In lieu of relocation, we respectfully request that
the following conditions be added to any approval of the requested tJ ;
1) 24 -hour noise levels will be adequately monitored on a bi-weekly/monadyr basis for the
First six months of testing and operations, and at least quarterly thereafter, with reports
available to Weld County, the Town of Johnstown, and the public, upon request.
2) Utilize a permanent air quality monitoring system at the facility, providing continuous
feedback and notification in case of anomalous emissions, with reports available to Weld
County, the Town of Johnstown, and the public, upon request
3) Provide an executed Roadway Maintenance Agreement between the Applicant and the
Town of Johnstown, arid obtain all necessary permits, prior to beginning construction of
the facility re for any Town roads that may be impacted by the construction or ongoing
maintenance of the facility.
The Town appreciates the opportunity to participate in the review of this project, and asks that
the Commission.ers take these concerns and proposed conditions of approval into account as
decisions are made,
Sincerely,
041-441-t
Gary Lebse
Mayor
CC: Johnstown Town Council
i
i
Criteria of Special Flood Hazard
Supporting Documentation:
A. Weld County Flood Plain Map
B. Pictures of 2013 Flood
C. Weld County Map Showing Adjacent Property to Proposed Compressor Station Site
Virginia Rae Stark Family Trust
Flood Hazard Development Permit -916
#5. That t h e application complies with Articles V a n d XI of this Chapter if the proposal is located
within the Overlay District Areas or a Special Flood Hazard Area identified by maps officially
adopted by the County.
Narrative:
The pictures and Weld County maps clearly identify the proposed location not only has the
potential risk to flood, it DID flood. In fact, those of us who live in this area and endured this
devastating event, witnessed it firsthand. The second Weld County Map shows the entire
bordering property to the west (within a few hundred feet) was issued a Flood Hazard
Development Permit. This location has significant drainage issues already. How does the
applicant intend to address drainage in the event of a catastrophic flood? Not only does this
not meet planning criteria #5, it also would not meet the criteria #7 which states there is
adequate provision for the protection of the health, safety and welfare of the inhabitants of the
NEIGHBORHOOD and the COUNTY. Compatibility with the region criteria is also not met.
E
Parcels (U
Owner; KERR-MCGEE GATHERING LIC
Account R0534201 Parcel: 10591 X0015
Address:
Subdivision:
Section: 18 Township: 4 N manes: 67W
Takice$ azarly2atoil aitiSeeicha 5
Dina 1-1(Total:1)
41 4 Page 1 of 1
Prat ell
0
V4eI“ lOunty Nearm US, Int I Weld_ t1
Criteria of Prime Farmland Section 23-2-22D. A. 6
Supporting Documentation:
Weld County Map — Important Farmlands of Weld County
#6. That if the USE is proposed to be located in the A (Agricultural) Zone District, the applicant
has demonstrated a diligent effort has been made to conserve PRIME FARMLAND in the
locational decision for the proposed USE.
Narrative:
Weld County Ill a p shows all of proposed site located within the PRIME FARMLAND.
•s.
Filter Sit otchas...
C S Mips
it Viviwickomeid.comsP flap i r*pe Vfrh1I/ti w I4{ LISAa
fectorarvote rks stuff I BOCC Pvt>lic Meet, , ,' Incompatible Flock IF 7018 A9endas - We.. rfl Happy Butte i Aut.. al What is the best set...
Property information 0070) 400-3650
PROPERTY' PORTAL Technical Support (970) 400.4357
rNM RIM rp 401 ti i-JunNi re
s1/4
I
•
Fl pin - 500 Year
Floodplain - 100 Year Zone A
Floodptain - 100 year Flooclway
Floocipiain - too Year Zone A€
Floodpiain + WO Year Zone AH
FPoo i n - 100 Year Zone AG
Important Farmlands of Weld County
Prime (drn ted) - Farmlands of National
Importance
irrigated Land (Not Prime)
High Pot rtat Dry Cropland - Prime if
they amore Irrigated
samii
inn:- 4S, hi WeiCi
if war-" p-r—rrtua4,
• w
Other bookmarks
p.
Criteria of health, safety and welfare of the NEIGHBORHOOD and the COUNTY
Not Met
Sec. 23-2-220. A.7
#7, That there is adequate provision for the protection of the health, safety and welfare of the
inhabitants of the NEIGHBORHOOD and the COUNTY.
Supporting Documentation:
1. Air Quality
A. Temperature Inversions Impact Air Quality Information Sheet
Specifically, in valley locations.
B. Fort Collins Coloradoan Article March 8, 2019
What's going on with Ft. Collins air quality this week?
C. World Health Organization
Commonly Associated Health Issues Associated with Inversion and Air Quality
D. Regional Topographical Maps that clearly show significant elevational changes in
proposed area.
E. Letter from Chuck and Norma (elderly residents that live less than a quarter mile
directly North of proposed facility who suffer from lung disorders (COPD)
Narrative:
We live here, we work here (often outdoors), we enjoy outdoor activities here and most
importantly we breath here. Although we are not accredited scientists...we all have
experienced the effects of these inversions in the valley that this facility is proposed. Many
times, it is visible to the naked eye.
Our hundreds of neighbors approximately one mile to the east in Pioneer Ridge and Pioneer
Ridge Elementary share our lid inversion affect and poor air quality. Numerous other
neighbors, and currently developed neighborhoods are also located in this valley region and are
affected, not to mention pets, livestock, and wildlife habitat along the Little Thompson River
less bordering to the North. Future residential growth is planned, and plotted directly to the
East in the municipality of Johnstown. (Less than 1000ft.)
It is unfair to blame the oil industry alone for the pollution in this valley, but you can reasonably
assume it is a contributing factor. This coupled with the inversion, the topography, and the
inherent dangers of the chemicals and emissions that are released both intentionally and
Temperature Inversions Impact Air Quality
What are temperature inversions? On most days, the temperature of air in the atmosphere is
cooler the higher up in attitude you go. This is because most of the suns energy is converted to
sensible heat at the ground, which in turn warms the air at the surface. The warm air rises in the
atmosphere, where it expands and cools. Sometimes, however, the temperature of air actually
increases with height. The situation of having warm air on top of cooler air is referred to as a
temperature inversion, because the temperature profile of the atmosphere is "inverted" from its
usual state. There are two types of temperature inversions: surface inversions that occur near the
Earth's surface, and aloft inversions that occur above the ground. Surface inversions are the most
important in the study of air quality.
Calm winds and the inversion result in poor air quality.
�The winter sun, low in the sky,
supplies less warmth to the Earth's surfaces
SWarmer air aloft acts as a lid
and holds cold air near the ground.
ei Pollution from wood fires and cars are
trapped by the inversion.
Mountains can increase the
strength of valley inversions
How do surface temperature inversions form? The most common manner in which surface
inversions form is through the cooling of the air near the ground at night. Once the sun goes
down, the ground loses heat very quickly, and this cools the air that is in contact with the ground.
However, since air is a very poor conductor of heat, the air just above the surface remains warm.
Conditions that favor the development of a strong surface inversion are calm winds, clear skies,
and long nights. Calm winds prevent warmer air above the surface from mixing down to the
ground, and dear skies increase the rate of cooling at the Earth's surface. Long nights allow for
the cooling of the ground to continue over a longer period of time, resulting in a greater
temperature decrease at the surface. Since the nights in the wintertime are much longer than
nights during the summertime, surface inversions are stronger and more common during the
winter months. A strong inversion implies a substantial temperature difference exists between the
cool surface air and the warmer air aloft. During the daylight hours, surface inversions normally
weaken and disappear as the sun warms the Earth's surface, However, under certain
meteorological conditions, such as strong high pressure over the area, these inversions can
persist as long as several days. In addition, local topographical features can enhance the
formation of inversions, especially in valley locations,
How do inversions impact air quality? Surface temperature inversions play a major role in air
quality, especially during the winter when these inversions are the strongest. The warm air above
cooler air acts like a lid, suppressing vertical mixing and trapping the cooler air at the surface. As
pollutants from vehicles, fireplaces, and industry are emitted into the air, the inversion traps these
pollutants near the ground, leading to poor air quality. The strength and duration of the inversion
will control AOI levels near the ground. A strong inversion will confine pollutants to a shallow
vertical layer, leading to high AQI levels, while a weak inversion will lead to lower AOI levels. A
large contributor to poor air quality during the winter is residential wood burning, Wood smoke
contains much higher amounts of particulate pollution than smoke from oils or gas -fired furnaces.
In some areas of the country, local governments issue bum bans to curtail the use of woodstoves
and fireplaces under certain weather and pollution conditions during the winter.
unintentionally during blowdown n operations of such facilities, present a REAL and possibly
hazardous danger to residents living in this region. This would also apply to compatibility.
We understand and support the need for this facility...but do not feel this is the right location
location.
What's going on with Fort Collins air quality this week?
Jacy Marmaduke, Fort CIAlWns Coloradoan Published 12:09 p.m. MT March 8, 2019 Updated 121] 6 p_m. MT March $, 2019
Air quality advisories have cloaked the Fort Collins, Greeley and Denver metro areas all week as the infamous "brown cloud" continues to linger over the
northern Front Range_
The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment issued an air quality health advisory for the region from 7 a.m. to 3 p.m. Friday. The state
has issued advisories every day since Monday.
The advisories recommend that older adults, children and people with heart or lung disease reduce prolonged or heavy indoor and outdoor exertion in
affected areas.
The culprit of this weeklong bout of poor air quality is fine particulate matter — tiny droplets that make the air look hazy and cause respiratory issues at
high levels. The fine particles themselves aren't unusual, said Scott Landes, supervisor and air quality meteorologist for the staters Meteorology and
Prescribed Fire Unit. They come from things like cars., power plants, oil and gas operations, and wood -burring.
But stubborn temperature inversion has trapped the pollution in the air_ Inversion, relatively common during the winter, happens when a layer of warm air
stifles a layer of colder air near the ground. The process prevents air in the atmosphere from mixing and leads to smog.
Gusty winds starting Friday night into Saturday will break up the inversion and "clean out" this lengthy pollution buildup, Landes said.
The state might still issue another air quality advisory Saturday morning because the health impacts of fine -particle pollution can linger after exposure, he
said.
,Jaciy Marrnaduke covers environment and other topics for the Coloradoan. Follow her on Twitter @acymannaduke. Support stories like this one with a
Arita/ subscription to the Coloradoan (https://offers.colorar,ioan, corns crab er cep&
squrcer NE icti egi site&utm urce=ne'jrs&utm campaign=NFWSRO0M&utm contenfrJACYMARMADUKEA.
� fee aru e es 4 ry9 - c per mom .
nups:/twww_ooloracoan.00rnrsioryfneVwrsfzu i vetku tirwnats-g ing-Tor[-coilins-air-quality-wIt,i ii U,JbbtI UUZ/
Health Issues
•y � _ r �� .. � �. .-z - -� •�• ^. r'S :'_d 1 i i i t .�- �r. try. i •. .-�- ^_ '-r �`� ="� r'~ 't 'I 5'`'1 � that
he World Health Organization estimates �' _ _� - Y � ; : I �:� ' ;; �_, �Rt. :y., a ;a t.� . -• F ,.; , ; .37
million people die every year around the world from the effects of air pollution. The vast majority of these
cases were directly due to coronary artery disease, and the second -most common cause is chronic
obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and respiratory tract infections.
There are several areas that are commonly associated with inversion and air pollution:
• Asthma: Poor air quality can cause asthma or make symptoms worse.
• COPD: This is a group of lung diseases that cause breathing problems.
• Heart disease: coronary artery disease, heart failure, ca rd iomyopathy and other heart conditions
can be affected by air pollution.
Heart attacks: Poor air quality Increases the risk of heart attack over time.
• Birth problems: Things like preterm birth, small birth size or weight, birth defects or even fetal or
infant death are possible.
a WEI
11111,111
Nnm
7 a
"S
r�r
t
CO RD I
US DR '
NORINMOOR
DN
'T1 1+" orn'.Ignowe 4rwaris
"T
opeaffiraaral
ore
•
r -r
sear
1
t 4
0
. fel 44%*,
ar...74 _ __ i a ‘1/266 ,:ji. ,_ A•diii....1..,..,,,s1/4..
7. --Is,. 4,44 --.,_ et ..... - ----.... w-i-iii.;444\
a Via
'�11' for rr—
71 irr -el
', '
slam
�f
r
-,
x
ti�
1
J
p
1
4
I
I
trrik
fa
tao
ttzt
R
*1
32
-COLORADaBLVD
I
1
i
I
aids
I.
1
ti _—lam
t
1
lh
I
i
J
ti
err
I
~L Y
Lel
i
4
d
•
log
I
I
I
r
March 22, 2019
Weld County Department of Planning Services
1555 N. 17th Ave
Greeley, CO 80631
Re: Case # USRI9-0011
Kerr McGee Gathering LLC
Proposed Project: USR for Oil and Gas Support
And Service (compressor station facility)
Location: CR 44 and CR 15
We have some major concerns about the location of this
compressor station:
1. Location. This is located in the Little Thompson River
Valley. The area is lower than the surrounding topography.
Inversions occur in this area frequently concentrating dust
from farming and county roads 44 and. 42 for days at a
time. It is my understanding that the Blow -Down from
compressor stations release many chemicals into the air
which would add to this existing air pollution. Both my
husband (100% disabled Vietnam Veteran) and I are
suffering from lung disorders and are on oxygen. We live
approximately 'A mile uphill from this proposed facility.
We are very concerned about the effect it will have on our
health. Research from reliable sources report many health
hazards.
2. Other residents: Two houses very close to site and Pioneer
Ridge and several proposed subdivisions are located on the
rim of this valley and will likely also be affected by these
inversions and the pollution they concentrate.
3. Noise pollution: The facility has said noise pollution will
not exceed 50db. Will the Bthw-downs exceed this level?
How often and at what time of day will these Blow -Downs
octir' ? .How win noise pollution and air pollution be
mitiPated for these BlowaDowns?
4. Ca$t ruction phase: Currently tankers and other oil trucks
spE d past our house on CR. 15 at all hours of the night
bonc ;ing over the Little Thompson Bridge. They damage
thor idge and are a hazard to us and animals. CR. 44 is
curmatly dirt and nansow and dangerous under certain
conit ions. What improvements to these roads will be made
for pu r safety and the safety of the construction vehicles
ant nployees during the construction phase?
5. Firth; azard: There are currently no fire hydrants in the area
and[ tin not aware of a waterline large enough to supply a
rdrant in the area. Where is the nearest Fire
Department trained and staffed to fight the type of fire that
in worse case could occur, and where would they source
water?
Proyei ty values: Property values will be decreased due to
peo1e ; refusing to live near a compressor station that they
perceji ye to be noisy, polluting, dangerous and unattractive.
7. Othr affect: Our personal enjoyment of the property I
purq1 ised fourteen years ago after almost a year long
searith will be reduced because it was purchased for its
vies c, law noise levels and solitude.
We will hg expecting a response to our concerns prior to your
approval Di this project, and request an open meeting where
these and tree concerns of our neighbors can be discussed.
Charles JEtt
Norma S4.ernrne
21607 Coi.1ity Road 15
Johnstown CO 80534
97Q5S3t2.?J 9
Development Standards:
Because we have only had the opportunity to see the presentation from
Anadarko concerning the compressor station for the first time today, it is difficult
to fairly address all of the development standards at the present time. Again, we
would request a future meeting with Anadarko to do so prior to the Board of
Commissioners meeting. In the spirit of fairness and equity, especially if the
permit is ultimately approved, we would request to have the same Development
Standards applied to the U R19-1011 in the areas of sound mitigation, visual
mitigation, light mitigation, and other applicable development standards that
were used in the LJSR of the Latham Gas Plant. Some of these would include but
not be limited to:
Compressors need to be electric.
Sound Mitigation Plan - Must be Residential Noise Requirements and monitored
at all times by a wireless noise meter with reports available to the public.
(See attached information)
Lighting - "Dark Sky" Outdoor Lighting
Essential Lighting System and Demand Lighting System
Visual Mitigation Plan-
5ft. sound wall around entire perimeter. Landscaping with trees on South and
East side.
Traffic- No traffic generated during construction or servicing the facility can
remain stationary on County Roads or park in residents' private drives at any
time.
In conclusion, we believe all criteria required has not been fully satisfied by the
applicant and most of our concerns are unable to be addressed by the applicant
because they are beyond the scope of resolution. We respectfully request the
Planning Commission to deny recommendation of approval of Special Use Permit
U S R 19-0011.
Regardless to the Planning Commission's decision, we would request the
opportunity to address mitigating issues with Kerr McGee/Anadarko prior to the
Board of Commissioners meeting in June.
We have not had the opportunity to be a part of a process that negatively and
inevitably affects our property, livelihood, and everyday way of life.
NoiseMeters Inc.
Home Contact Applications Products Rental
USA T
Products > Noise Monitors > Sonitus > FM2
EM2OIO Wireless Environmental Noise Monitor
E 20 1 O Wireless Noise Monitor
Features
• Very quick and easy to install
• Connection to Internet over mobile phone network
• Connection and contract included
• Weatherproof monitor and microphone
• Email and SMS alerts
Applications
• Construction site and boundany noise monitoring
https://www.noEserneters.cor Vprcdutt)sanitus/em2010/
5/20/19 4:40 PM
Page 1of4
• Industrial sites dose to residential areas
• Transport noise a road and rail
• Airstrips, airfields and small airports
• Outside Entertainment Venues
EM2010/6 $6864.00
Environmental Noise Monitor with
GSM and 1 Year Contract
Overview
Connection
2 weeks
Add so art
EM2010/GA $14305,00
Environmental Noise Monitor with
Audio, GSM and 1 Year Contract
2 weeks
Installation
Specifications. se Monitor is designed
for medium and long term
environmental noise monitoring. It is the
quickest and easiest to install of all our
monitoring systems and comes as a
complete package with mobile phone
connection already active.
This unit is ideal for any noise
monitoring application that demands a
unit that meets IEC 61672 and would
benefit from access to the noise
Addis can
More Options
Rental Options
Reporting Options
The microphone has a standard thread,
so it can be mounted on a tripod for
short term use or on a mast for long
term noise monitoring.
The processing unit is enclosed in a
die -case aluminum box, but for double
protection and ease of powering (the
power supply unit is not weatherproof
we recommend mounting the processor
and power supply in the Outdoor
Enclosure (order code EMENC). You
https://www_noisenieters.corriJproduct; sonitusiern201O/
5/20/19, 4:40 PM
Page 2 of 4
measurements through a standard web
browser.
The EM2010 Noise Monitor consists of
an Outdoor Microphone, a small box
with the processing unit, and a power
supply. It can be connected up in
minutes - just connect the microphone
and power supply to the processor and
away it goes. The unit will automatically
measure the periodic Leg and L90,
storing the results internally for up to 1
year and uploading them regularly to
the web server.
The noise reports are viewed by
logging in to a web site and selecting
the days of interest. The results can be
viewed in a tabular or graphical format,
or you can download them to Excel (or
similar spreadsheet program) and
create your own reports.
Portable EN
$8920.0
can see the Outdoor Enclosure on the
Options tab and read more about
installing the monitor on our Installation
page.
Portable Noise Monitor
The EM2Q10P is a portable version of
the same noise monitor. If you need to
regularly relocate the monitor or have
no power at the monitoring location
then p'ease see the EM2010P Portable
Wireless Noise Monitor. The
functionality and noise measurements
are identical to the EM20I0, but. it is
supplied in a weatherproof case with a
7 -day rechargeable battery pack and
microphone tripod.
Related Products
Outdoor Shot
From $652
LiveNoise wi
11
$2726.0
Noise, Di.
Vibratio
•
From $1O6;
https://www.noisemeters,comiproductisonitusiem2010/
5/2O/1%, 4:4Q PM
Page 3 of 4
Vicinity Map
GWA Midstream Facilities
I
i t
aorta
4
t
IProposed Compressor Station
,7r !p
big ''moip t
tee
•Riliva•
+� ,f-ei-P a
1
anghton
rearat
•
Wallenberg Plant
O
r
rvn-'rE, westerngas. X s. 00117
2
Siting Rationa
le
• Within proximity to our future proposed oil and gas development and existing
pipeline infrastructure
Future development would be difficult due to setbacks from existing oil and wells
and facility locations on parcel
• An existing pipeline corridor running south to north dissects the property.
• Continued Agricultural Operations
Community Meeting
• 7/31/2018 — Meeting held to help us understand if there are
concerns from the surrounding community
• Held 3 months prior to planned USR submittal date
• Sent invitations all property owners within 1/2 mile of the proposed
Compressor Station
zN Community Meeting
• Full scope of proposed Oil and Gas
operations in and around the Town of
Johnstown
• Compressor Station and 43 Horizontal
Wells and Production Facilities
• 1,188 residents invited
• 23 people attended - Only 2 inquiries
about the Compressor Station
• Invitation was also sent to Planning
Staff from the Town of Johnstown
AREA OF OPERATIONS
Please see below for the planned locations of our well pads. Enclosed you will also find a flier with a
description of the different phases of new oil and natural gas development.
Colorado Response Line
5
For more information on oil and natural gas development,
visit
MANX MCI .orq
www,.studyrfrackir gtorn
Scan this QR Code with your
smart phone to see ow Life
Cycle of a Well video on
IlAWN_youtube_comfAnadarkoW
r n-'rv. wey terngas.00117
Community Concerns
• Collected community feedback
• Addressed concerns during the planning and design of
the facility
• Primary concerns brought up were visual impacts and
traffic
WWW. wey tern X24'. cc ii?
v?,)Community Concerns — VISUAL
• Shifted Facility to NW
corner of property
• Proposed masonry
wall on southern
boundary of facility
C
WWW. wey tern X24'. cc ii?
Community Concerns — VISUAL — Elevation Profiles
• Decreased the height of the communication tower from the usual
70 feet design to 35 feet
• Reduced the visual impact of the compressor station by reducing
the surface elevation and the fill volume required
Surface
Elevation
Fill Volume
Preliminary Design
4,812.5 ft
102,000 Cubic
Yards
1st Revision
4,810.5 ft
67,000 Cubic
Yards
2"d Re�ision�
4,809.5 ft
54,000 Cubic
Yards
11 Total Savings
aft
48,000 Cubic
Yard
The savings in fill
equate to a reduction
of 4,180 vehicle trips
WWW. wey tern X24'. cc ii?
8
• Haul Route — All traffic being routed from the west — Also
minimizes dust due to both WCR 44 and WCR 13 being
paved
30% of traffic to
utilize WC R. 44 to
proposed location
v?,)Community Concerns - TRAFFIC
• Shared access with PDC Energy to avoid traffic being
routed in front of concerned residents
• Additional screening provided by existing Tank Battery
Community Concerns - TRAFFIC
• Drainage Design — Cooperation with Weld County Public
Works to find a drainage solution that minimized impacts
• Extreme reduction in fill dirt and truck trips
• Thank you Hayley Balzano for the time spent meeting and
working with us on a better design!
Additional Steps - Ensuring Compatibility
Construction Timing
• During daylight hours - Work done in the evening or over weekends may occur if
necessary, but these activities will generally be limited in scope
Noise Mitigation
Compressors located in individual compressor buildings and fitted with High Specification Noise
Suppression Packages (HSNSP)
These include hospital grade mufflers and cooler silencers
Light Mitigation
• Shielded and Down-casted
• Sensor Operated
• Unmanned Facility — Decreased light usage at night
• 5 similar sites permitted since 2113 — Only 2 calls related to lighting
Questions?
•
WWW. wey tern X24'. cc ii?
13
Elevation Profile - View from South
r1
F,
I
t` \ ELEVATION — SOUTH
ti:_ f TO SCALE
n
I
ELEVATION — SOUTH WITH WALL
:••rT: _LE
r T3T17. wey tern a4'. cc ii?
14
S Elevation Profile - View from Northeast
ELEVATION - NORTH EAST
L;-Ja J Y0T T U ?t:tau
rvn-'rE, wey tern X24'. cc ii?
15
Hello