Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20193803.tiffUSE BY SPECIAL REVIEW (USR) APPLICATION DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES * 1555 N. 17TH AVENUE * GREELEY, Co 80631 www.weldgov.com * 970-400-6100 * FAX 970-304-6498 FOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT USE: AMOUNT $ 21500 APPLICATION RECEIVED BY DATE RECEIVED: CASE # ASSIGNED: PLANNER ASSIGNED: 4/17/2019 U R 19-0034 MH Parcel Number*: 1 4 6 9- 0 1 0- 0 0 _ Address of site: 5404 CR 23, Fort Lupton, CO 80621 Legal Description: PT SW4 1-1-67 Zone District: 0 1 5 Section: 1 (*A 12 digit number on Tax I.D. information, obtainable at vivwv.weldgov corn). Township: 1 N Range: 67 W Ag Acreage: 2.4 +/- Floodplain: NON eological Hazard: Y{XV Airport Overlay: Val FEE OWNER(S) OF THE PROPERTY: Name: Manuel G. Ruiz -Prieto and Gloria Karina Ruiz Company: Ruiz Trucking, LLC Phone #: (720) 402-1143 Email: ruiztruckingllc@icloud.com Street Address: 5404 CR 23 City/State/Zip Code: Name: Fort Lupton, CO 80621 Company: Phone #: Street Address: City/State/Zip Code: Email: Name: Company: Phone #: Street Address: City/State/Zip Code: Email; APPLICANT OR AUTHORIZED AGENT: (See below: Authorization must accompany all applications signed by Authorized Agents) Name: Kelsey Bruxvoort Company: A PROfessionals Phone #: (970) 535-9318 Email: kbruxvoo'rt@ag Street Address: 3050 67th Ave City/State/Zip Code: Greeley, CO 80634 D ro .COM PROPOSED USE: USR request to park up to 7 semi -trucks on property. Semi -trucks will be used to haul water for oil and gas support or other hauling as market conditions allow. I (We) hereby depose and state under penalties of perjury that all statements, proposals, and/or plans submitted with or contained within the application are true and correct to the best of my (our)knowledge. Signatures of all fee owners of property must sign this application. If an Authorized Agent signs, a letter of authorization from all fee owners must be included with the application. If a corporation is the fee owner, notarized evidence must be included indicating that the signatory has to legal authority to sign for the corporation. r r ROW i Sig natu e: Owner or Authorized Agent Date cvVis Signature: Owner or Authorized Agent Date Print Name Rev 4/2076 DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE 11 AGPR.fessionals October 17, 2018 To Whom It May Concern: Gloria Karina Ruiz is working with AGPROfessionals to process work related to land use and permit work relating to a Weld County U R. A PROfessionals is authorized to represent and request the release of all records necessary on the behalf of Gloria Karina Ruiz. We respectfully request that all correspondence be directed to AGPROfessionals. Sincerely, notteite, ALIVIbr Gloria Karina Ruiz Date ENGINEERING, PLANNING, CONSULTING & REAL ESTATE 3050 67th Avenue, Suite 200 a Greeley, CO 80634 978.535.9318 / office 0 970.5 5.9854 / fax 0 ww ., lg.pro&co y I AGPROfessionals DEVELOPERS UI' AGRICULTURE USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW (USR) QUESTIONNAIRE Prepared for Ruiz Trucking, LLC and Gloria farina Ruiz Planning Questions: 1. Explain, in detail, the proposed use of the property. The property owner is requesting a Use by Special Review (USR) permit to park up to ten semi -trucks on the subject property located in a portion of the Southwest Quarter of Section 1, Township Al North, Range 67 West of the 6th P.M. The semi -trucks will be used to haul water for oil and gas support or other hauling as market conditions allow. Two to ten full-time employees are proposed including on -site employees and drivers. Drivers will be on -site for less than two hours at a time. There is an existing manufactured home which will be used as an office. A 40800 SF garage is proposed to allow the storage of trucks indoors. The garage may contain a restroom facility for employees. Parking is proposed to the south and east of the existing residence on improved gravel surfaces. Additional on -site parking will be available for employees. There will be up to 500 gallons of on -site fuel storage with appropriate containment. No painting, vehicle maintenance, or manufacturing is proposed. No sign is proposed at this time. Outdoor lighting is wall -mounted. Light poles are not proposed. All lights will be shielded and directed down as required in the veld county Code. 2. Explain how this proposal is consistent with the intent of the Weld county code, chapter 22 of the Comprehensive Plan. This USR application has been prepared utilizing the process outlined in the Weld County Code and Procedural Guides. The Guiding Principles of the Comprehensive Plan found in Section 22-1-120 states, "Land use changes must afford flexibility based on the specific location and the particular circumstances encountered within the locality. It is also important to weigh the cumulative impacts that specific land use changes will have." This proposal is respectful of surrounding uses. The application is consistent with Section 22-2-20 G. A. Goal 7. "County/and use regulations should protect the individual property owner's right to request a land use change, and 2. A. Policy 7.2. Conversion of agricultural land to nonurban residential, commercial and industrial uses should be accommodated when the subject site is in an area that can support such development, and should attempt to be compatible with the region." The site is in an area that can support the proposed use. This proposal is compatible with the surrounding area. ENGINEERING, PLANNING, CONSULTING & REAL ESTATE 3050 67th Avenue, Suite 200 0 Greeley, CO 80634 970.535.9318 /office 0 970.535.9854 / fax O www.agpros.com Page 2 of 7 3. Explain how this proposal is consistent with the intent of the Weld County code, chapter 23 (Zoning) and the zone district in which it is located. The proposal is for semi -truck parking in the A (Agricultural) Zone District. Semi -truck parking is allowed in the A Zone as a Use By Special Review as called in Chapter 23, 23-3-40. 23-3-40-S. Any use permitted as a Use By Right an accessory use, or a Use by Special Review in the commercial or industrial zone districts, provided that the property is not a Lot in an approved or recorded subdivision plat or lots parts of a map or plan filed prior to adoption of any regulations controlling subdivisions. PUD development proposals shall not be permitted to use the special review permit process to develop, Adequate provision has been made to protect the health, safety and welfare of the inhabitants of the neighborhood and the County. Operation Standards as found in Section 23-2-260 of the Weld County Code were consulted in preparing this application. 4. Describe what type of land uses surround the site. Explain how the proposed use is consistent and compatible with surrounding land uses. The uses adjacent to the site are listed below: West of the site: South of the site: East of the site: North of the site, Ramirez Trucking & Oilfield Services, Inc., SPR12-0005 12-0005 T C Woods, U RI 1-0001 -- Sawmill, Furniture, Lumber SUP 24 — Kennel & USR 671 — Farm Equipment Repair Highway 52 Other uses in the surrounding area include construction companies, trucking companies, outdoor storage facilities, kennels, commercial greenhouses, oil and gas production sites and gas plants, gravel mining and various agricultural uses. 5. What are the hours and days of operation? (e.g. Monday thru Friday 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 pm.) Parking at the facility will occur 24 -hours a day, 7 -days a week. operation are 5:00 KM. to 8:00 P.M., 7 -days a week. Occasional operations outside of the primary hours may be required due to the oil and gas industry service needs. The primary hours of 6. List the number of full time and/or part time employees proposed to work at this site. Two to ten full-time employees are proposed including on -site employees and drivers. Drivers will be on -site for less than two hours at a time. 7. If shift work is proposed include the number of employees per shift. Shift work is not proposed. Page 3 of 7 8. List the number of people who will use this site, Include contractors, truck drivers, customers, volunteers, etc. It is proposed that approximately two to ten drivers will use the site. Typically, drivers will arrive at the site and leave in semi -tractor trailers for the day. The drivers will be on site for less than two hours at a time. 9. If this is a dairy, livestock confinement operation, kennel, etc., list the number and type of animals. N/A 10. Describe the type of lot surface and the square footage of each type. (e.g. asphalt, gravel, landscaping, dirt, grass, buildings) Lot surfaces will include improved gravel surfaces for the parking area and native grass. 11. How many parking spaces are proposed? How mafly handicapped (ADA) parking spaces are proposed? The site contains an existing improved gravel surface parking area. Ten spaces for semi - truck parking are proposed including parking inside the garage, As the parking area is gravel, striping and specific spaces for personal vehicles are not specified. This facility is not open to the public. 12. Explain the existing and proposed landscaping for the site. The existing vegetation will be retained on -site as much as possible. There is existing landscaping located north of the manufactured home. Additional off -site landscaping/screening exists east of the property near the Brighton Ditch. 13. Describe the type of fence proposed for the site. (e.g. 6 -foot chain link with earth tone slats) The existing metal post and tension wire fence is expected to remain_ 14. Describe the proposed screening for all parking and outdoor storage areas. If the site is located in a floodplain outdoor storage is restricted. Parking is internal to the site. Minimal screening is expected to be needed as the uses surrounding the subject property include trucking companies, a sawmill and lumber yard, farm and equipment repair, Highway (HVVY) 52, outdoor storage facilities, and oil and gas production sites. Screening will be provided by the existing trees and manufactured home. The subject property is not located in a floodplain. 15. Explain any proposed reclamation procedures when termination of the Use by Special Review activity occurs. If parking activities cease to occur on -site, semi -trucks will be removed from the property. Page 4 of7 16. Who will provide fire protection to the site? The Fort Lupton Fire Protection District will provide fire protection to the site. 17. List all proposed an -site and off -site improvements associated with the use (e.g. landscaping, fencing, buildings, drainage, turn lanes, etc.) and a timeline of when you will have each one of the improvements completed. No off -site improvements are proposed. Existing on -site improvements include a manufactured home which will be used as an office, improved gravel surfaces, landscaping and fencing. A 4,600 SF garage is proposed to allow the storage of trucks indoors. The garage may contain a restroom facility for employees. Engineering Questions: 1.. Describe how many roundtripsiday are expected for each vehicle type: Passenger Cars/Pickups, Tandem Trucks, Semi-Truck/Trailer/RV (Roundtrip trip in and '1 trip out of site) Typical vehicles accessing this site include employee and owner vehicles and semi -trucks. The following numbers are expected for this facility: Semi -tractor trailers: up to 10 trucks, one round-trip per day each Pickups and cars: 2-10 trips/day for personal vehicles 2. Describe the expected travel routes for site traffic. The existing access to this property is located on Weld County Road (WCR) 23 approximately 265 south of HWY 52. Semi -trucks will exit the site at the existing access on WCR 23 north to HWY 52 for east -west travel. WCR 23 is a paved collector and H WY 52 is a paved state highway. 3. Describe the travel distribution along the routes (e.g. 50% of traffic will come from the north, 20% from the south, 30% from the east, etc.) It is projected that travel distribution along HWY 52 will be 50% to the west and 50% to the east 4. Describe the time of day that you expect the highest traffic volumes from above. The highest traffic volumes will be generated during morning hours between 5:00 A.M. to 7:00 A.M. and during evening hours between 5:00 P.M. to 7:00 P.M. 5. Describe where the access to the site is planned. The existing access to this property is located on WCR 23 approximately 265' south of HWY 52. This access road is shared by the Ruiz property and two adjacent properties and there is an existing easement. Page 5of7 6. Drainage Design: Detention pond summarized in a drainage report is required unless the project falls under an exception to storm water detention requirements per code section 23-12-30 P.1. A. Does your site qualify for an exception to storm water detention? If so, describe in a drainage narrative the following: 1. Which exception is being applied for and include supporting documentation. 2. Where the water originates if it flows onto the property from an offsite source 3. Where it flows to as it leaves the property 4. The direction of flow across the property 5. If there have been previous drainage problems with the property The site is located in a non -urbanizing region with the total project area having less than 10 cubic feet per second (oft) for the 100 -year, 1 -hour storm event and is therefore exempt from stormwater detention per Article XII, Storm Drainage Criteria, Section 23-12-30 Drainage Policy, Exception F.1.a.10. The site has a relatively flat topography with slopes ranging from approximately 3% to 5% predominately towards the east. Water historically flows to the irrigation ditch bordering the property and ultimately to the South Platte River. Offsite flows from the north are intercepted by HWY 52. Offsite flows from the west flow to the property boundary and are diverted to the north borrow ditch by a swale. , Offsite flows from the south flow southeast away from the site. Offsite flows from the east flow west but are intercepted by the irrigation ditch. Therefore, an increase due to offsite flows is not expected. B. Does your site require a storm water detention pond? If so, the following applies: 1. A drainage report summarizing the detention pond design with construction drawings and maintenance plan shall be completed by a Colorado Licensed Professional Engineer and adhere to the drainage related sections of the Weld County Code. 2. The drainage report must include a certification of compliance stamped and signed by the PE which can be found on the engineering website. 3. A general drainage report guidance checklist is available on the engineering webslte. More complete checklists are available upon request, As determined by a Colorado Licensed Professional Engineer, the site is exempt from storm water detention. A drainage narrative is included in the application materials. Environmental Health Questions: 1. What is the drinking water source on the property? If utilizing a drinking water well include either the well permit or well permit application that was submitted to the State -Division of Water Resources. If utilizing a public water tap include a letter from the Water District, a tap or meter number, or a copy of the water bill. Water will be provided through well permit no. 67416-F 2. What type of sewage disposal system is on the property? If utilizing an existing septic system provide the septic permit number. If there is no septic permit due to the age of the existing septic system, apply for a septic permit Page 6 of 7 through the Department of Public Health and Environment prior to submitting this application. If a new septic system will be installed, please state "a new septic system is proposed". Only propose portable toilets if the use is consistent with the Department of Public Health and Environment's portable toilet policy. Employees may use the restroom located in the manufactured home which has an existing septic system, permit no. P-0701131. In the future, a septic system may be installed in the proposed garage for employee use. 3. If storage or warehousing is proposed, what type of items will be stored? Up to ten semi -trucks are proposed to be parked at this facility. Storage and warehousing are not proposed to be a main activity of this request; however, storage in compliance with Weld County Code may occur on -site. 4. Describe where and how storage and/or stockpile of wastes, chemicals, and/or petroleum will occur on this site. See Nuisance and Waste Management Plan included in the application packet 5. If there will be fuel storage on site indicate the gallons and the secondary containment State the number of tanks and gallons per tank. There will be up to 500 gallons of on -site fuel storage with appropriate containment. 6. If there will be washing of vehicles or equipment on site indicate how the wash water will be contained. No vehicle washing is proposed on -site. 7. If there will be floor drains indicate how the fluids will be contained. No floor drains are proposed. 8. Indicate if there will be any air emissions. (e.g. painting, oil storage, etc.) No regulated air emissions are anticipated from this site. 9. Provide a design and operations plan if applicable. (e.g. composting, landfills, etc.) N/A 10. Provide a nuisance management plan if applicable. (e.g. dairies, feedlots, etc.) The facility willadhere to the maximum permissible noise levels allowed in the Commercial Zone District. Sources of light will be shielded so that light rays will not shine directly onto adjacent properties where such would cause a nuisance or interfere with the use on the adjacent properties. Neither the direct, nor reflected, light from any light source will create a traffic Page 7 of 7 hazard to operators of motor vehicles on public or private streets. No colored light will be used which may be confused with, or construed as, traffic control devices. The property owner or operator will be responsible for controlling noxious weeds on the site. Trash will be collected in a covered, confined trash dumpster and removed at least weekly by a trash removal company as described in the Nuisance Management Plan. All roadway, parking and operations areas will have improved gravel surfaces. Watering of surfaces will occur as necessary to suppress dust. A Nuisance Management Plan is included in the application packet. 11. Additional information may be requested depending on type of land use requested. N/A Building Questions: 1. List the type, size (square footage), and number of existing and proposed structures. Show and label all existing and proposed structures on the USR drawing. Label the use of the building and the square footage. Existing Manufacture Home: 1,400 SF, MF O9-00004, to be used as an office Proposed Garage: 4,800 SF, for indoor storage of trucks 2. Explain how the existing structures will be used for this USR? The existing manufactured home will be used as an office. A 4,800 SF garage is proposed to allow the storage of trucks indoors. The garage may contain a restroom facility for employees. 3. List the proposed use(s) of each structure. See above. Document must be filed electronically. Paper documents are not accepted. Fees & forms are subject to change. For more information or to print copies of filed documents, visit www.sos.state.co.us. -Filed Colorado Secretary of State Date and Time: 02/28/201 01:26 PM ID Number: 20131139986 Document number: 20131139986 Amount Paid: $1.00 ABOVE SPACE FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Articles of Organization filed pursuant to § 7-80-203 and § 7-80-204 of the Colorado Revised Statutes ( .R. S .) 1. The domestic entity name of the limited liability company is Ruiz Trucking LLC (The name of a limited liability company must contain the term or abbreviation "limited liability company", "ltd. liability company", `limited liability co.", "ltd liability ca.""tic.", 'rik ", or "lid. ''. See 'P40 -t 01, C.R.S) 'limited", . . (Caution: The use of certain terms or abbreviations are restricted by le . Read instructions for more information.) 2. The principal office address of the limited liability company's initial principal office is 8843 Colorado Blvd Street address Mailing address (leave blank if same as street address) I. Apt B-201 (Street number and name) Thornton (City) CO 80229 al (P/Postal Cam) UStates (Province — ifapplicable) (Country) (Street number and name or Post Office Box information) (City) (State) (ZIP/Postal Code) (Province — if applicable) (Crum) f 3. The registered agent name and registered agent address of the limited liability company's initial registered agent are Name (if an individual) or (if an entity) Flu iz-prieto Manuel Genaro (Last) ('First) (Mid t'ie) (Sufi) (Caution: Do not provide both an individual and an entity name) 8843 Colorado Blvd Street address Mailing address (leave blank if same as street address) ARTORG_LLC Apt B-201 (Street number and name) Thornton co 80229 (ZIP Code) (City) (State) (Street number and name or Post Office Box information) Page 1 of 3 Rev. 12/01/2012 (City) he following statement is adopted by marking the box.) The person appointed as registered agent has consented to being so appointed. Co (State) rim Code) 4. The true name and mailing address of the person forming the limited liability company are Name (if an individual) or (if an entity) (Caution: Do not provide both an individual and an entity name.) 8843 Colorado blvd Ruiz -Prieto Manuel Genaro (Last) (First) (Middle) (Suffix) Mailing address apt B-201 (Street number and name or Post Office Box information) Thornton CO 80229 (City) (State) (ZIP/Postal Code) United States (Province — if applicable) (Count) (If the following statement plies, adopt the statement by marking the box and inc/Se an attachment) The limited liability company has one or more additional persons forming the limited liability company and the name and mailing address of each such person are stated in an attachment. 5. The management of the limited liability company is vested in (Mark the applicable box.) ❑ one or more managers. or 1 the members. 6. (The following statement is adopted by marking the box.) There is at least one member of the limited liability company. 7. (If the following statement applies, adopt the statement by marking the box and include an attachment) ❑ This document contains additional information as provided by law. 8. (Caution: Leave blank f the document does not have a delayed effective date. Stating a delayed effective date has significant legal consequences. Read instructions before entering a date.) (If the following statement applies, adopt the statement by entering a date ancL if applicable, time using the required f format) The delayed effective date and, if applicable, time of this document is/are 0212 812 013 01:00 PM (mmosickloyyy hour:minute amtpm) Notice: Causing this document to be delivered to the Secretary of State for filing shall constitute the affirmation or acknowledgment of each individual causing such delivery, under penalties of perjury, that the document is the individual's act and deed, or that the individual in good faith believes the document is the act and deed of the person on whose behalf the individual is causing the document to be delivered for filing, taken in conformity with the requirements of part 3 of article 90 of title 7, + .R. ., the constituent documents, and the organic statutes, and that the individual in good faith believes the facts stated in the document are true and the document complies with the requirements of that Part, the constituent documents, and the organic statutes. ARTOR,G_LLC Page 2 of 3 Rev. 12/01/2012 This perjury notice applies to each individual who causes this document to be delivered to the Secretary of State, whether or not such individual is named in the document as one who has caused it to be delivered. 9. The true name and mailing address of the individual causing the document to be delivered for filing are Ruiz -Prieto Manuel Genaro 8843 Colorado blvd U apt B-201 (Street number and name or Post Office Box information) Thornton (City) CO 80229 (Stale) (ZIP/Postal Code) United States (Province -- rf applicable) (Country) (If the following statement applies, adopt the statement by marking the box and include an attachment.) This document contains the true name and mailing address of one or more additional individuals causing the document to be delivered for filing. Disclaimer: This form/cover sheet, and any related instructions, are not intended to provide legal, business or tax advice, and are furnished without representation or warranty. While this form/cover sheet is believed to satisfy minimum legal requirements as of its revision date, compliance with applicable law, as the same may be amended from time to time, remains the responsibility of the user of this form/cover sheet. Questions should be addressed to the user's legal, business or tax advisor(s). ARTORO LLLC Page 3 013 Rev. 12/01/20 t2 AGPROfessionals DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE April 11, 2019 Mr. Michael Hall Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Subject: PRE18-0323 Ruiz Trucking, LLC eio Manuel G. Ruiz -Prieto and Gloria Karina Ruiz AGPRO O Project #: 2625-02 Dear Michael, Thank you for your feed on the Ruiz Trucking, LLC Use by Special Review (USR) application. We have responded to your completeness review comments in BLUE as follows: PLANNING COMMENTS: 1. Write that the water well (permit #67416-F) is approved for commercial use and will be a shared well with the subject Ruiz USR property under USR questionnaire, Environmental Health item #1. Furthermore, is shared use of this well permitted by the Division of Water Resources? Is the Shared Well Agreement recorded? Well permit no. 67416-F condition of approval no. 4 states: "the use of ground water from this well is limited to commercial purposes and the watering of domestic animals." A copy of the well permit submitted with the USR application is also enclosed here for reference. The Ruiz Trucking, LLC and Ramirez Trucking & Oilfield Services, Inc. Shared Well Agreement was recorded on June 4, 2018 at reception no. 4404194, a copy of the recorded agreement is enclosed. It is unknown whether the shared use of the well is permitted by the Division of Water Resources. We would request the well be evaluated during the USR referral process and that any requirements be addressed as a condition of approval of the 1_T S R if needed. 2. Is the septic system (permit # P-0701131) approved for commercial use? If so, state this under the USR questionnaire, Environmental Health item #2 and indicate how many individuals may use the system. ENGINEERING, PLANNING, CONSULTING & REAL ESTATE 3050 67th Avenue ■ Greeley, CO 80634 970.535,9318 /office • 970.535,9854 / fax • www.agpros. cum Page 2 of 2 Septic system permit no. P-0701131 was permitted for residential use. A copy of the septic permit submitted with the U. application is also enclosed here for reference. We would request the septic system be evaluated during the USR referral process and that any requirements be addressed as a condition of approval of the USR if needed. If needed, portable toilets can be provided for employees. As stated in the USR application questionnaire, two to ten full-time employees are proposed including on -site employees and drivers. Drivers will be on -site for less than two hours at a time. Typically, drivers will arrive at the site and leave in semi -tractor trailers for the day. Employees may use the restroom located in the manufactured home, septic system permit no. SP -0701131, In the future, a new septic system may be installed in the proposed garage for employee use. 3. Submit an updated Certificate of Conveyances cover sheet that has been signed within the past 30 days. The cover sheet submitted in the application is from October 1st, 2018. An updated Certificate of Conveyances will be provided once available. 4. Detail the cleaning/removal of the concrete scrap piles as visible on the aerial imagery. The concrete scrap piles were removed from the site prior to the sale of the property in 2018. Please contact me at (970) 535-9318 if you have any questions. Thank you, 14114,irtaiC Kelsey Bruxvoort Land Planner End. 1. Well Permit No. 67416-F 2. Recorded Shared Well Agreement 3. Septic Permit No. SP -0701131 AGPROfessionals DEVELOI3EKS OF }AGRIC tny Lit RE Notice of Inquiry Weld bounty Use by Special Review Application Prepared for Ruiz Trucking LLC Manuel G. Ruiz -Prieto Gloria Karina Ruiz Kelse Bruxvoort From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Kelsey Bruxvoort Tuesday, November 27, 2018 2:45 PM Todd Hodges 'Alyssa Knutson'; Tim Naylor; 'ruiztruckingllc@icloud.com' WC Notice of Inquiry Form for Ruiz Trucking LLC - 5404 CR 23 Fort Lupton NOIspdf; Pre -Application Request_11.06.18.pdf Hi Todd, AGPROfessionals is representing Ruiz Trucking, LLC and Gloria Karina Ruiz in a Weld County Use By Special Review request. As required by Weld County, please find attached the Notice of Inquiry Form and copy of the Weld County Pre -Application Request prepared for this application. Ruiz Trucking is proposing a Weld County Use By Special Review permit to park up to 7 semi -trucks on the subject property located at 5404 CR 23. Please refer to case no. PRE1S- O323, Please respond with comments or let me know if Fort Lupton has no comments as we are required to wait the full 21 - day period if we do not hear back. We appreciate your consideration/ Thanks, Kelsey Bruxvoort Land Planner AGPRofessionals 3050 67th Avenue Greeley, Co 80634 Office: 970-535-9318 Mobile: 970-744-0068 Fax: 970-535-9854 www.agpros.co m AGPROcessionass 1)F1'I_I d ,1'. F: ''° V-,.'(til,1 l.'!.]'. 1 Notice of Inquiry Development Within a Coordinated Planning Agreement or Intergovernmental Agreement (CPA or ICA) Boundary Date of Inquiry 11/27/2018 Municipality With CPA or IGA Fort Lupton CPA Name of Person Inquiring Agprofessionals c/O Kelsey Bruxvoort for Ruiz Trucking LLC Irma Ramirez Property Owner licha�el Hall mhall weldgov.com Pia n n e r Legal Description W f 1�T1i�-Ft 146901016 Parcel Number Nearest Intersection HY52 &CR23 Type of Inquiry USR for commercial trucking business and parking The above person inquired about developing a property inside your designated CPA or IGA boundary. This person has been referred to community by Weld County Planning to discuss development options on this site. Visit Chapter 19 of the Weld County Code for specifics on your agreement. Weld County Comments Annexation interest? Name/Title of Municipality Representative Municipality Comments Michael Hall Digiu I iy stifle -el by Michael Hall i set:20i6.1 i11 11:13;30 4700' Signature of Weld County Planner Signature of Municipality Representative Plase return the signed form to: Weld County Planning Department 1555 N 17th Avenue, Greeley, CO 80631 (970) 353-5100 x3540' (970)304-6498 fax II AGPROfesssonals DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE Access Weld County Use by Special Review Application Prepared for Ruiz Trucking LLC Manuel G. Ruiz -Prieto Gloria Karina Ruiz GPROfessionals DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE Access Statement Use By Special Review (USR) Ruiz Trucking, LLC and Gloria farina Ruiz Access Statement The subject property is located south of Highway (HWY) 52 approximately 600 -feet east of Weld County Road (WCR) 23. The proposed Ruiz Trucking, LLC facility will allow up to ten semi -trucks to be parking on the approximately 2.4 -acre site. The semi -trucks will be used to haul water for oil and gas support or other hauling as market conditions allow. The existing access to this property is located on WCR 23 approximately 265 -feet south of HWY 52. This access road is shared by the Ruiz property and two adjacent properties and there is an existing easement, see the enclosed property map and easement agreement. Semi -trucks will exit the site onto WCR 23 and travel north to HWY 52 for east -west travel. Semi -trucks will not gain significant speed before the access roads intersects with WCR 23 due to the distance from the property to WCR 23. WCR 23 is a paved collector roadway and HWY 2 is a paved state highway. The uses adjacent to the site are listed below: West of the site: Ramirez Trucking & Oilfield Services, Inc., SPR12-0005 South of the site: T C Woods, NR11.0001 — Sawmill, Furniture, Lumber East of the site: SUP 24 — Kennel & USR 671 — Farm Equipment Repair North of the site: Highway 52 The existing access has been reviewed and approved as an access point for the Ramirez Trucking & Oilfield Services PR12-0005 site and the T C Woods USR11-0001 site. Enclosed are the PR12-0005 and U R11-0001 plats. Enclosures: 1. Property Map 2. Easement Agreement 3. SPR12-0002 12 -0002 4. U R11-0001 ENGINEERING, PLANNING, CONSULTING & REAL ESTATE 3050 67th Avenue, Suite 200 ❑ Greeley, CO 80634 970.535.9318 /office ❑ 970.53 5.9854 / fax D www.agprosacom co ri PIT WELD COUNTY L)NLJNE MAVPIN+ -444,7 1 WGS_1984_Web_Mercator Auxil is ry_Sp here © Weld County Colorado � a This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only, Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION 22236 4447 Feet Notes 4403861 06/0112018 02:49 PM Total Pages: 3 Pee Fee: $23.00 Carly Koppes - Clerk and Recorder, Weld County, CO EASEMENT AGREEMENT THIS EASEMENT AGREEMENT is made on July20, 2012, by and between ALICE Efr PEER,hereafter Owner, and Ramon Ramirez, hereafter Holder. in consideration of $250.00 in hand paid by Holder to Owner and the mutual promises and agreements herein contained, Owner hereby grants Holder an easement for ingress and egress over and across the property described in paragraph 1 hereof for the sole Use and benefit of the property described in paragraph 2 hereof upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, 1, Commencing at the West quarter corner of Section 1, Township 1 North, Range 67 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, County of Weld and State of -Colorado; thence S 0 0189 09 " E and along the West line of the Southwest quarter of said Section 1 a distance of 275.15 Feet} thence N 89 041' 51" E and normal to the West line of /he said Saar west quarter a distance of 24.96 feet to the tie point of beginning; thence S 89 0571181' E and parallel to the North line of the said.Southwest quarter a distance of 694, 69 feet,. thence 5 00 '09' 18" E a distance of SOfeet; thence N 89 ° 57' IS" W a distance of 694.63 feet to a point on the East right ofway line of Weld County Road 23; thence N 00 022118" W a distance of 50 feet, more or less, to the true point of beginning. 2. Apart of the South-west quarter ofSection I, Township 1 North, Range 67 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, County of Weld, Stale of Colorado, more particularly described as beginning at the Non/west corner of the said Southwest quarter,- thence East along the North lire of the saidSouthwesr quartera distance of 584.0 feet thence S U O 20130" E and parallel to the West line of the said So uth',4est quarter a distance of dO feet to the true point of b eginn ing; thence continuing S 0020' 30 " B a distance of 215.0 feet; thence West and parallel to the North line of the said Southwest quarter a distance of 559.0 feet to a point 25.0 feet East of the West line of the said Southwest quarter; thence WO° ° 20' 3O'+ W and parallel to the West litre of the said Southwest quarter a distance of 1650 feet, more or less, to a point on the southeasterly right of way line of Colorado State Highway number 52; thence N 44° 59' 58"E and along said southeasterly right of way line a distance of 70.71 feet, more or less, to a point 60.0 feet South of the North line of the said Southwest quarter; thence East and along the southerly right of way line of the said Colorado State Highway number 52 and parallel to the North line of the saidSouthrest quarter a distance of 509.0 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. And also: A.part of the Southwest quarter of Section 1, Township 1 North, Range 67 West of the. Sixth Principal ilifettian, County of Weld, State of Colorado, more particularly described as beginning or the Northrwest_carner of the said Southwest quarter; thence Eastalong the North The of the said Southwest quarter a distance of 384.0 feet; thence S 0° 20' 30" E and parallel to the West line of the said Southwest quarter a distance of 60 feet to the true point of beginning; thence continuing 5:0° 20' 30" E a distance of 213.0 feet; thence East and parallel to the North line of the said•Southwest quarter a distance of 135,66 feet; thence S 0O20' 3V" E a distance of 50 feet; thence East and parallel to the North line of the said -Southwest quarter a distance of 333,12 feet more or less to a point on the westerly bank of the Brighton ditch; thence N 22° 03' 30" W and along the said westerly bank a distance of 285.92 feet, more or less, to a point 60.0 feet South of the Worth fine of the said Southwest quarter, said point berg on the South right of way line of Colorado State Highway number 52; thence West and along the southerly right of way line of the said Colorado State 1-figirway number 52 and parallel to the North line of the said Southwest quarter a distance of 36330 feet, more or less, to the true point of beginning. 3, The interest herein granted is an easement interest only and this agreement does not convey any fee Interest in Or to the property described in Exhibit A4, nor any interest of any kind in or to any water in, on or under the said property nor any interest in or to any coal, oil, gas, sand, gravel or any other minerals in, on or under the said property. 4, This easement is for purposes of ingress and egress to a trucking, excavating and oil field service business operated by Holder on the property described in Exhibit B and for no other purpose whatsoever. The purpose of this easement is to allow access to the above business by Holder, Hoiders's employees, persons delivering equipment and supplies to Holder's business.and customers of Holder's business. 5. This easement does not grant Holder the right to install any utilities, fences, gates or other structures within the bounds of the easement, either on or below the surface thereof, nor the right to obstruct the easement In any fashion or for any purpose, 6. This easement is non-exclusive and Owner reserves the right to use the property for any purpose which does not, interfere with Holder's lawful use of the easement granted herein and also reserves the right to grant other easements to other persons over, across, under and Through the property on which this easement is located, 4403861 06/01/2018 02:49 PM Page 2 of 7. This easement runs with the land and will inure to the benefit of Holder's successors and assigns, but only as to the rights herein granted and for the purposes herein stated. As further consideration for this casetnunt, Holder agrvcs that Holder will operate his business on the property described iii Exhibit B as a tracking, excavating and oil field service business only and not as any other type of business. Holder may expand such operation by the erection cif a shop on the premises, but such shop shall be for the repair of Owner's tacks and equipment only and shall not be used to repair or maintain trucks, vehicles or equipment belonging to persons other than Owner. 9. IfHoidershall breach any ofthe terms set forth in paragraph 8 above, Owner, her heirs, successors, administrators or assigns, shall have an action against Holder for injunctive relief Loco rnper termination and cessation of Such breach said#° enjoin any activities conducted contrary to the provisions of said paragraph. Elolder agrees that in any such action Owner, her heirs or assigns, would have no speedy or adequate remedy at law and would suffer immediate and irreparable injury in the absence of injunctive relief and that Owner, her heirs and assigns would suffer a loss ofthe use and enjoyment of their neighboring property such as could not be properly compensated by monetary damages alone. 10 This agreement shall be binding upon the Owner and her heirs and assigns. 1 I The provisions of pare phs 8 and 9 above shall survive any termination of this easement, shall be binding upon Holder's heirs and assigns and shall be deemed to he covenants running with the land. 12. In no event shall Holder cause any damage to the easement area nor shall Holder obstruct the easement area at any time. Should Holder cause any damage to the easement area., Holder shall immediately repair the same at Holder's expense. In no event shall Ownek, her successors or assigns, be responsible for or liable for the cost of any maintenance or repair to the easement or any roadway constructed thereon, 13. In any action brought to enforce or interpret the pray isions hereof the prevailing party shall be awarded his costs and reasonable attorney fees. 14. Venue for any action brought hereunder shall be and lie in the District Court in and for the County of Weld, State of Colorado, 15. This easement agreement shall be enforced and interpreted under and pursuant to the law ofthe State of Colorado. In witness whereof the parties have hereunto set their hands and seals this 17th day of ,i 46,4, �►lw c Pchr - for STATE OF COLORADO ) ss COUNTY OF WELD ) )° 2012. i' an n Ramirez a Holder The fares.oing was subscribed and sworn to before me on July 17th , 2012 by Alice Pehr, Grantor. My Commission expires 0944 Notary Public STATE OF COLORADO ) } ss COUNTY OF WELD The foregoing was subscribed and sworn to before me on July 17th , 2012 by Ramon Ramirez, Holder. My Corn fission expires 412 t fit( 4- m Dawn Koshio Gillespie Notary Public State of Colorado My Commission Expires 941.2014 4403861 06/01/2018 02:49 PM Page 3 of • NCUMenr_ s nch q * Shopping Can O Dart * hirchafricilistori a * Weld County • L gput �publicweb EASEMENT AGREEMENT a 3870160 General map, Do mment Number 3870160 : Reeordittg Date Number Pages 08/31 01211:x:32 Alvl 2 Recording Fee Poctimentary Fee $16a4f0 Total Fee $16,00 Mimes SIGNATURESREAD TO DECIDE PEH ft ALICE 13 RAMIREZ Z RAMON Related Document Number rata Legal Data • q{ Section:1 Tewntip: t Range: 67 PT r Return Add ran Z & PEHR Address! 8501 TURNPIKE DRIVE STE 11,0 Address2 City State Zip WESTMINSTER CO 80031 Mailback Date /19/2012 12:18;14 PM https://seaichieris.co. e1d.co,usfre rderf'e8g1e eb/Vie DOC.Jsp ode DOC100 12 6 11/5/2012 ►: �J�h7� � 4s_Mlt is t��r �p-� r1 1 PM I'i -"-"es , 4rw�k i a.S, inw al � 1& ��:a•�aoe�.sa� i fi�a� � iar ii< 99�ti �i91i�tr� GI�Yw5 Tali 11:1iM 1fli, iB; �i3. 1 i;el, S _ A f Cri 0 co s. m r r• f itnItOr tt} r i — • F jrIW C- 41115i ;ligiep is ' i ep II 5 qg PA ill; iri rs co RAMIREZ SITE PLAN REVIEW WELD COUNTY, COLORADO i I1 r • SITE PLAN REVIEW tiAP i coulf27 ROAD 23 Ca :n; r 1 s sg 'Is ti 0 Via,- i �� ott i i 1 TS! ity "1 -IRC 4rd,0al...CM Ivan\ Wit i. Or rain Alti: is rein flaw 1i inn Sig e . urn Par r! 4 R! Ys L. Lewd n seal Centrist praise' tit Sabo a S woe Sari en -- C ii S N!I figs �i:I 41 4 Is Mak a. Par Lr .ear Ada tia sr •.i Sic sot .r o• r■mr rr .1s1I1ks ad the emirs iffy era r, r sIq^ e. (USES OF BEARthiG I 9 • VICISCOPEISLITTER it M 3 4 • Itroi- a 427 — IO1 1 4 fLs wk T 1. "tea ma e's H J • • ittincut 1g0 Orr ;O it 41 miff t ati a knit • • Ott? I.-1913-00C O Ki ma I-- 4.0' .4 PP P4019 a3 3dOHd KETTEUNG,& NORTON in 82o 8th Sired Crook% Colorado It i no .3 'rad (970) 395 880 _rt 1 ;14 ,Oi = al. t31 OS Prat !Jig ta N Y ld S wzi aVISIONS agE ireff file' OVIWIt USii 0 I mn p.ninl Pier! and Uweb! *MAO R fwt'ear Pert&. UIR 11.. 101, le ar a the be Wit MCii iii Lk& er t3ea Irr Weal grad hi Did 3'araa Otatr$c'te taa,ea r4 oat r -fl 4 eater �r haat end ti rn3ert) y Idea lmrt+ eI. 5406 CFA 23 FORTLUPTON, N, O LO R D via! leuu eh" �. pint,.% to tight (t), Ca 'IDS hi th. appSaatlan. 80621 reeei*d eilia 'CMS Mi 0 OS legitpig , rr wall MSS hi at *'d stir ►rte S.irlstrr w de cslatailleStic 'ISMt+� . OS i r" laaSkt tens aw .eregt ere in ire en us i•Ki.er aaa aeerrre,ee ewe 'et • !•_ in d tareMat was Cirlon WPM VP itt weed Ciefi>>il I MIA re pep fl lift pi poi poi hits le fir ilia . isir..e Nal 'i i. / p. t.M�t�s as in rt■ .M s0.awrni.e �Y�!'Rani e/e� X1;11!• rr 1JP aelianinn Ilea" W *St e.. 1. aw s"te"t e%nsir' Chia( s 14+•e J as area web Pan ilstnoi awns S t !tan sea as v. sine r.t+!+,a�•sne rr•r sac ant se tr ee lent. Mart eh cal sae "la R.e+et■ A M9 a Tara ';LSI V&A of rag r•+sr etM. ..+ — . ear SOS span 'I' n1�rillw ask was St�.s,�r'. ewes ■� ra n' aS I a.r�1 -aa sari ter ■ last Seat! ri s Month icek g a ate - - fl ___ t e�� wee Ass na se fen se awl e%s trs� r h>b•?t4 noes .9 rS are ant ere turd ae. ..a.. S i i 1r 7 Ina inrtt =in •ice a•.ia iii tint 'isle -a ---j stir s..tp ee rap mnith apera�r yi twos sir tern ire rem r,�,w0. Weraami nier, i• d._. _ direr L... irl' ee�io at Yrwrdiri ill Itss tat --aline iii ii al"i Yl i iM*eei� i�t Mr eryire tit tin air a mi tr 6Ne "helot in 1hr i e( a oars ti .1 amen__ nprealena Prilithen serilitee ran ri`�rwei iv ti rr4r i, iiritriiii if M �r'al41, M+ F fries #57S a *y�R .,+ air sip el Vii tt 4. r - l a' . nom' - i hiked rrte+t sem h e t+ now li ISeme es toan+effr` Wilda Sin t riel.nW9 s ft Waft Yin lite �_ rs+rrls rarer. oae+r + parr,✓ eiffilliga arson . fr efrlee� - aim n airs 'seed ran ee.r-rr. lay (wry trop rpm. Swirl r l eat here. #+ na l tutee ISA fttit ere one am Inn.. wt mi It We se ft Sail bin fir• .e.lefraall aa1i ."4 ■ r ar._..t<- w —r4K Wawa Si Enron Siff lie nisi wire it tom+1ii. ear rr !- rc ! r it: k . . r r1"� erie.riit net .ee . mitre rsiee hillier say that'll Is roan Imps PR'S PIPIAL WES Pr its SAS . niter te:le kiwi Ili ea +tfl t4 ilhi POW aid Creep •ears a *rat wa al r Kay Illre2 C irater r+ -watt V,. era flier eel as 0.44 one w a erne new la wad wean sir ii d iii NS Cat mob arid.& d rasalu wr , $Fe Farr ra!•i+as ui sr ie tr s.... • wine nee lacnun' i ears. — ______ is tan aware e.e.r r Sea 4 Ito Cast. ad t Tina e91ri+ ram S ha Melt w+ee��e l 4.. - .., agrraraets +a*ip ew strait line ri tin 11m p Serer A"s"st refsliar eery e_ awe! ,j- -..e,� �iirii hi riR to M .aviiarettorise r -_,Hire r.#t Airy te,a see dettrerr ere ail •tatty late OR tots e,eiiiir 'coal i rase 11�Vr mime so malt wf,ri+S 1. s�y, mop ni Is Oa*. I. lei ikiP i SAW n.weeeri .' . de rwsd wy kit ., a Si In _..S4.I It .lataO tirsl w*Min a -e,e. @in n r- li► an, It tart. e,i'wr! 7ewk le oies t&Sri In an an is On hen I. UM 'ear* MIA Iii WI ,Are, A •e,ifie'Y41i hetti=i Fri x+41 •a AS 'ea IMS set aria Y1t/iik ea SWUM p t r Sr asi a aryl lee lent p_. I al4. wren en S't inenni see, ,ieYlieei Hen Ili# era r. L._-. 64 lie WPCs WPM SO nett are here t's inn is rent tai sap Ise Heir lief •ie.i Far eke jrillah d the rihrtt r 3don may ants a tooted pronely right platint tai Stalin 23-I-10 of on the 'f Gn tti trcn-t ref 44 c411c wJys at operation iLoi be tenni tie tint.,. to &Oa p.m., Monday through', i t inei a. an iderind an tea sail *Wee Mead Sin arid Facilities el WC 014,, vs* #tarp% ek 4 wrnagweO Aar 4sny, drepne a in a • ogre ei niece oral yekw vetar dcalltrmin r'q.a 9r4 0 "snipe Ou of ire e.eRr istcd art tit:rl rAst_ Thin le tint mart to i1'ottihr si i! f rein Usti eitrriinwe a a rata amide" M the - le efki ratatea P4%, fl.79=1O4rS, c tt .ail be handed. Mond. and denteed at in a manner that controls parlterdit* emislianae biaarinp debris, and other potsey MI r114441Icm 4 operate In anattlerios with the appnvrsd Wane Handling Mon. in dl gitiptrasnill .nfGag ar"e"a rote ccQ nsrs ail zrrell0 t aced prere•rt aide a#lt Ike Miss aria Reguiedie.iaof the Water Chart, Cenral • trisittwriehta, oinete~ T',i el% I heels pietllaulat id elltiebbim that bte eaettaftad eifk this mks. The eke 4r wean:1e gs witht apponve Not . teteni e. Pan, et all 14 ni tard7�ea eyn _ a+a + nivel t, piiftria'�trte Ii Viae>i will la Iih.rd l S4 i bW.eS tf a, Fiend sear' , CM tall ttsr ilea Mud be ai vtrlded liar einatdreeu 1 =4f' J. 4t *I urm w "a> Ie uele lretor supply stmt be provided far Making mid sanitary ptepasrs. Motes ehllefecSm r'wtt in deed end hillig iii Zit a iari mummer In 1!mid e !flaw that s or9aeio nRffifillii ire rsisaare of lids en -ero foo ltryy's water system wrwi more that 7% Winn on a defy bode, the r,lfije aim'the Coivogla Pdrryay Oialdng Wpt#r ieepatiewe I oaten its the mcreht tm permteaible notes larval" onored In the ct, as dt{'.r idiwt in Stettin 11.4—S} of tin Verad capital," Oxfe. hill be trroto irS at tho rfdrahn St in Plaid try Ciparirent of fidbi+s WA, ii. (Me grow 1. ne n hyena MtaQ,ed •kit the id* of the ntdi,rtttr5�t1 tLa it as la Vs iluatarniwil. at Its M itd Centr Ernorterri*Mtt' s nista 0 rya+Jei 1504M9-3 rt>,taa:eina fiber afft. t 4 ▪ pteocerig a eel as Ili amain et italic. The apat ad Vial la node I met [re 904 S tow 4 see parrrrtr frigfrt [iiricae sl luau swim let It'.ir8r,rtai, On cratelit it motet &itt&i 'for ono fiierp to lathed i rMaauit as atty. trlaatlro. Na', lie .O* GtsM MN -be rxeweesasr mite not newt .* etrinldr5 .3tir etmrdsrdt en didrrsp by fen/ oil Raitio Neagh and tretehhCAMEWIL The opelnat li Mows", ryse amain, weir Or to Ideturretiett 014 @arkilltilly wv n IMO An torn* with oN applleable Mai and regulations of *tots and federal au t 811.' de D. melon _ tructire 41 be FIb .,i#tC s�1iItMA�i Rind 1 eipoot the ragweedtor Pewees be req"rired to u pu.r, K l %"sand an the seg*Cir efts Rot be ►u'q►.dred to me l nearer,, free and Chu I otr�+igs imp ct rss !rat at' 59*tolar shad Iwe reepafteab& for ownplytnp with the 4edgn $1+artderds 4) el ilia ,04li clingy Can nor or antillos INN be ceeb C*I adia for cS'r yin2 With the Operation 43x2 of the Weld Ccc npr Oct. MalIds *keeled *a Thin *It toys olA noI Pena ifEtar► 4004 adPaalrhi, ►+nook coun a triSonoe or inter, on elan the tee on the saLecent dens el% Ite iMk frdLPs the trill torn any ND4l i IlOder apes Ii alpr.tadts Of +Parlor vitrl&rl! aI INS* re colored =my be treed sh'th s tanfl wd .hip. as central n the ells what! tae rein to rse ti ax*,rdr e..Um approved ✓ eedp ESI. or Our party, br- tAecasmo antabrgdta4 lye a matt al he d, iliaofigantitpfientifortif Senn r,irp.ortiibie let cardrol$Ip the ant to ;POW la, !4+ OSS i and 1. ell r*4 Rind can* Cade. wnnrti from the Veld Carunty tinertrnsnte or Planning Services, Pitt Win eng trAntinner4 r+P ti MP' °C 4I! WIN en t+e ialf 9t Mn nicer Is was* Q4 esilhPUss pentad taiti on Ire pftoparl careiply rof Sarni and Dirrea rn,eed 111,4*,derts Lana rr ern rd an ity regulatirons re prflttr are ION & eel l ;w#a44 lip ge r44-iit*ninl On 'Vie Pio to such a einernibag parssyrrre til'a metarrot c$'reraeter el OW ale tart% prwtwrit • the nee asrtrj otha a tit'Ibutled ti iota, eels and Madly !wenn. 'Beat. *War manna pontpng at o1O!ttA wen, n, not nulonelbte for the rriankttetnrxe wet art —ells %tartans naiad feat sod Revise weer Doe tar l+hltsd to alp eiani 41 nevi h r cn e' -d Rolm storiate ds eyed aril aggricabie Wed Coat rteun t;, al n #11001 fly 0494 aft Cl41~1nM Stteleardfs, ae Pews+µ+ Pe 44.10. o reral of ore ttnw.edrend er Ile Puna:! ter ma "lead mrr�yr Bond of n Wang .�h change -I frail • (tea plantrse Devecipnieltkk�'Min fsrde Oriel ciao p. ehrai S. f . .n the ol't4tns a r tin t npQrtnurn rer cc warena stet by rs cr."ri s for coca gerrq ■riMJ1 nit or the 151illomeatiaainaleta at a s tbnenla m* ' Ile fret be rear fr rehaiaP rI flre 'Pmnn Ikf tie bout ell Ross op fart Vetpmwn,, us it manors in Section 2:-2-ZG..J.3 of the Weld replosed an the MAL orsour ton 6ll'I Phi BEG XT PT 32534 35'11 Of tdW Ca4R 5W4 Edi4.66SXt3t4'Ea? S4 'MATO WLY i 521D5Tt9t34.t?4'5S0Wf 41.03 5}CO0ZN IXJ1'53.50 3W4731'500059W4SSb' t1(rw9s.4 N77a) iW l sa.eb Srsala M.kTali3tei}#5W 32.34SflD12WSS28'NIM025W tl l 5W4 tt0D20W is7 r-72 f 1C} 4E+G ALSO SEC ww COl! 5002Cre 3251-09.4611:, iait Pa 13' MittPIUOSY'W 1 a' N14029W220.36rW3x312 TO'r'ALIE POti AGPROfessionals DEVELOI)ERS C.. ' AG .RA.: Li LI RE Drainage Weld County Use by Special Review Application Prepared for Ruiz Trucking LLC Manuel G. Ruiz -Prieto Gloria Karina Ruiz Drainage Narrative For Ruiz Trucking, LLC Being Part of the SW '/a of Section 1, Township 1N, Range 67 W of the 6th P.M. AGPROfessionass DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE AGPROfessionals 3050 67t' Avenue Greeley, CO 80634 (970) 535-9318 March 11, 2019 Rtii' Tntdtc u, . LLC Table of Contents Certifications.aaeea..a.■..■..r...a.....rrrrrpiblii+P..4R4+a..... .4.*M,. ... s. u.. ....a.. . ............... 3 Summary- - ..a.am..........•444...........................,.................... 4 Introi■+�■ r�71■ f■ a duction......e..e }.:.44944!4 ■,..aa..L.t..am*n.arrt++pike++4tps.....6a*tPp**+6* P1P***+**s+***m*.....• 1. Location ......-ihibiMMNI&MOOOMtrt.e e.r rrrraet++•+++•+9+ 4444044«!..1.*1Fa**1P*+*1Pa.D. 2. Property Description npr0444404.4a...an.. 4a..•. rare rre046.40106!B#P-444PP40444:e.4u********+*4 5 Historic Drainage 44444444499P inter. .ip-P#aas:4.ay.air.a:*..-n,. 6 1. Overall Basin Description 144844404.4 berrikfPPtPPI+ti 6 2. Drainage Patterns Through Property ....as.: 04444 3. Off -site Drainage Flow Patterns .444446 Drainage Design Criteria 7 1. Development Criteria.4 - 7 2. Hydrological Criteria - -04094440,0441i _ 7 Conclusions 4..6+4494: a,4 _ .. ... ..iit...f . .489 - • 8 List of References 9 J•--i •4V4 ..i� � � •ii8}88}81.aa41f444P Appendices Ruiz Trucking. (LC Certifications I hereby certify that this drainage narrative for the Ruiz Trucking, LLC proposed USR was prepared under my direct supervision in accordance with the provisions of the Weld County storm drainage criteria for the owners thereof_ 1 • 4 y`i•,��t`!'�+I iiielA- r z ))t , A LI ; , , C Chad Te'elde, P.E. AGPROfessionals 3/11/2019 Drainage Narrative Page 3 of 9 AGPROfessionals, 3050 67th Avenue, Greeley CO 80634 * 970-535-9318 * \%'. X12_"I?1'Lr LTA 11 Ruiz Trucking, I ii„ C Sum mSummary The project site for the proposed USR is an agricultural property with an existing outbuilding. The applicant is proposing parking and a garage for commercial truck parking. The site is located in a non -urbanizing region with the total project area having less than 10 cubic feet per second (cfs) for the 100 -year, 1 -hour storm event. Therefore, it is exempt from stormwater detention per Article XII, Storm Drainage Criteria, Section 2342a30 Drainage Policy. '. Exceptions. Exceptions to stormwater detention shall not jeopardize the public health, safety, and welfare of public and private property and shall be limited to the following: a. No stormwater detention will be required for sites that meet any of the folloconditions. Requirements of the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (M54) areas remain applicable. 1 O) NON -URBANIZING areas where the total project stormwater runoff less than, or equal to, 10 e sfor the 1 - hour, 100 -year, storm event. 3/11/2019 Drainage Narrative Page 4 of 9 AUPROfessionats, 3050 67th Avenue, Greeley CO 80634 * 970-535-9318 Vk vh aaprc :1 cots Ruiz Trucking,11C Introduction 1. Location The proposed site is in part of the SWPA of Section 1, Township 1 North, Range 67 West, of the 6th PM. This site is located approximately one and a half miles west of Highway 85 and directly west of Fort Lupton, CO. Highway 52 borders the property to the north. The properties surrounding the east and south side of the property are zoned agricultural and the property on the west side is zoned commercial. A vicinity map is shown in Appendix A. 2. Property Description The applicant is proposing the development of the 2.37 acre parcel. The proposed site is currently a non -urbanizing, agricultural property. There is an existing manufactured home which will be used as an office. A 4,800 SF garage is proposed to allow the storage of trucks indoors. Parking is proposed to the south and east of the existing residence on improved gravel surfaces. Additional on -site parking will be available for employees.. There are two types of soil: Kim Loam (5 to 9 percent slopes) and Olney fine sandy loam (1 to 3 percent slopes). The majority of the soil is well drained, hydrologic soil group B (see USDA-NRCS Custom Soil Resource Report in Appendix B). There are no major open channels within or adjacent to the proposed property. An irrigation ditch borders the property on the east. 3/11/2019 Drainage Narrative Page S of 9 AGPROfessionals, 3050 67th Avenue, Greeley CO 80634 * 970-535-9318 * ar�r���►w.a prt� _ tsr Ruiz Trucking, Historic Drainage 1. Overall Basin Description The site has a relatively flat topography with slopes ranging from approximately three to five percent predominately towards the east. Water historically flows to the irrigation ditch bordering the property. A topographic map was downloaded from the United States Geological Survey (U) website and is shown in Appendix C Historically, there have been no previous drainage issues with the property. A Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) map of the project area is included in Appendix 11 The property is located on panel 08123C1575E l 2 15 7 5E and is not currently located within a 100 -year floodplain. 2. Drainage Patterns Through Property The site is located in rural Weld County and is surrounded predominately by agricultural zoned land. The property to the west is zoned commercial. A Master Plan for the site area is not currently available. The site is mostly east sloping and has a generally flat topography. Historically, the basin drainage ultimately flows into the irrigation ditch and ultimately to the South Platte River. 3. Off -site Drainage Flow Patterns Offsite design flows from the north are intercepted by Highway 52. Offsite flows from the west flows east to the property boundary and are diverted to the north borrow ditch by a swale. Offsite flows from the south flow southeast away from the site. Offsite flows from the east flow west but are intercepted by the irrigation ditch. Therefore, an increase due to offsite flows is not expected. 3/11/2019 Drainage Narrative Page 6 of 9 AGPROfessionals, 3050 67th Avenue, Greeley CO 80634 * 971-535-93)8 * www.a . s)r9S coin Ruin, Truck in g,., t.IC Drainage Design Criteria 1. Development Criteria The proposed runoff calculation was determined using the criteria set forth in the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District (UDFCD) Volumes 1, 2 and 3 and the Weld County Engineering and Construction Guidelines (WE) manual. 2. Hydrological Criteria From N+ AA Atlas 14 Fort Lupton, COprecipitation station, the estimated rainfall from the 100 -year, 1 -hour precipitation is 2.66 inches (see NOAA Atlas 14 Precipitation Data in Appendix E). This value was used for runoff calculations. Percentage of imperviousness was determined using the recommended values from UDFCD Table 6-3. The overall percentage of imperviousness for the proposed site was determined to be approximately 44 percent (see Percentage of Imperviousness Calculation in Appendix F). Using the 100 -year, 1 -hour design storm and the UDFCD Detention Basin spreadsheet, the peak runoff flowrate was estimated using the Modified FAA method. The peak runoff flowrate was calculated using the time of concentration, runoff coefficient, and the precipitation depth in the UDFCD spreadsheet (see UDFCD Runoff Calculation in Appendix G). The peak runoff flowrate was determined to be approximately 732 cubic feet per second (cfs). 3/11/2019 Drainage Narrative Page 7 of 9 AUPROfessionals, 3050 671E Avenue, Greeley CO 80634 * 970-535-9318 * w v . rte. Por Ruiz Trucking„ LLC Conclusions This drainage narrative is consistent with the Weld County Engineering and Construction Guidelines. An increased risk of damage from storm runoff is not expected since the site is located in a non -urbanizing region with the proposed development having less than 10 cfs for the 100 -year, 1 -hour storm event. We recommend that the site be exempt from storm ater detention per Article XII, Storm Drainage Criteria, Section 23-12-30 Drainage Policy. 3/11t2019 Drainage Narrative Page 8 of 9 AGPROfessionals, 3050 67th Avenue, Greeley CO 80634 * 970-535-9318 * ‘Lvtvwr ,corn Ruiz Trucking, I 1 C. List of References Federal Emergency Management Agency. "FEMA Flood Map Service Center." FE Flood Map Service Center. FEMA, 20 Jan. 2016. Web. 7 March 2019. <https:, lmsc.ferna.govlportal>. United States Department of Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service. "Web Soil Survey." Web Soil Survey. USDA - NRCS, 2006 Web. 7 March 2019. chttp://websoilsurvey.se.egov.usda.gov/App/Web Soil urvey. asp >. United States Department of Commerce - National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. "NOAA's National Weather Service." Point Precipitation Frequency Estimates. USDC - NOAA National Weather Service. Web. 7 March 2019. <https:/flidse.nws.noaa. govt'hdse/pfds/pfds_printpage.html?lat=4+0.4645 lon-- 104.5 3 93 &data.=depth&units=engl ish&series=pads . United States Geological Survey. "Maps." Overview - Maps, United States Geological Survey. USG , 2016. Web. 7 March 2019. www.usgs.gov/products/maps/topo-maps>. Urban Drainage and Flood Control District. Detention Basin Volume Estimating Workbook. Computer software. Software. Vers. 2.34. <http://udfcd.org/software>. Urban Drainage and Flood Control District. "Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual Volumes 1." USDCM: Volume I Management, Hydrology and Hydraulics. UDFCD, Mar. 2017. Web. 7 March 2019. http:lludfed.orglvolume-one . Weld County. "Property Portal - Map Search." Property Portal- Map Search. Weld County, 19 Dec. 2017. Web. 7 March 2019. <https://www.co.weld.co.usimapsfpropertyportaracct=R8952931>. Weld County. "Weld County Engineering and Construction Criteria Guidelines." Weld County Engineering, July 2017. Web. 7 March 2019. www. eldgov.comiUserFiles/ ervers/ erver_6 Fi lelDepartments/Pub►lic% 0' orks n gineering/WC % 0-%20-3-17.pdf.> 3/11/2019 Drainage Narrative Page 9 of 9 AGPROfessionals, 3050 67th Avenue, Greeley CO 80634 * 970-535-9318 * ��a ►ti � _____ m Ruiz Tmc inp.„ LLC Appendices A. Vicinity Map B. U DA-NRCS Custom Soil Resource Report C. USGUSGS Topographic Map D. FEIVIA Floodplain Map E. NOAA Atlas 14 Precipitation Data. F. Percentage of Imperviousness Calculation G. UDFCD Runoff Calculation Ruiz Trucking, LIE APPENDIX A Vicinity Map IIMPIN WELD COUNTY Vicinity Map ONLINE WO ill I NG 1,117 12 2.2342 Feet 2,234,2 WGS_1984 Web _l lercator_AuMiliaryr Sphere © Wield County Colorado 0 -tic-. , J • if RASir .14 a i '._ b - x,3 _1 liwagr r L I _IFS/ a VI ict :2 :11 4. � i S ne !• • 47i' h --tea ly ,. 'R' �• Y. • 'Y at x?.*. II p 10 .bd. I r� a . SIPIws Ibis map ,s a user generated static output from an In ernel mapping site and is for reference only Data layers That appear or this map may or may not be accura:e, curreriL or otherwise (dipole THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION _Jr I- . Hr S "9i • t - • I4.1 Legend Parcels Highway Signs 14 w 25 34 31 52 60 66 71 76 79 65 119 257 263 341 IITSM nem Wee — V1.;‘ fr Ira h• ------ 392 Address Label Road Name Notes Ruiz Truelcin , LA APPENDIX B USDA -MRCS Custom Soil Resource Report USDA United States Department of Agriculture MRCS Natural Resources Conservation Service • A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local participants Custom Soil Resource Report for Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part Ruiz Trucking LLC March 7, 2019 Preface Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas. They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers. Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand, protect, or enhance the environment. Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil properties that are used Fri making various land use or land treatment decisions. The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations. Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some cases., Examples include soil quality assessments (http:/fiww. n,resAisdda.g. ov/wps/ portallnreslmain/soilsihSalth/) and certain conservation and engineering applications. For more detailed information, contact your kcal USDA Service Center (https //off=ices,sc.egov.usda.gov locator/app` agency inres) or your NRCS State Soil Scientist (http: //wv w. n res. usda .g ov/wp s/portallnres/detail/soils/contactu s/? cid=nres142p2_053951). Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to basements or underground installations. The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey. Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of art individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) persons with disabilities who require 2 alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C, 20250-9410 or call <800 795 3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (1 DO). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employers 3 Contents Preface . ! • ■ ■ . . ♦ . n e i att •a b'1e.eerh . .-.-.aagip/ Visaed ■att.a.aaa.Mi.r rill' ■ e.J■at• rt al '1.114. e •• ! • How Soil Surveys Are Made.■r■..�-!eerteriTTr�c�+=+s:ac Soilar . c+.a.«!....... ..... 4411........■,i ar•••.a ra•■n ■■■ria* etrew !. ... • Soilap....... .t.u.1.■. mnaaarerne r11•r■tre.••r1,t::.o::.taa.4ee.•...aaaaa iL egend.. .n..... .... menial ..... rve.erer•eiter! •'!.a::..ea.'i ...SOON '.n:e■.■11rnit..rt!t:r}iitaarAt..... 10 Map Unit Legend at etas -ant e • . . - • • e t !• i T •r n e ! • i : a . a a ♦ . t•N.at tai it a. a■•. 1' r.l.arlat.rr.! a-• rr ra..r 1444"‘,0"4"4" 8 ■.11'14■11'rtf t:.i• :.. a.a F: 11 Map Unit Descriptions....„...,.. . . ..... . . ,s.: m.att.riliete!}i.:{14....11 Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part...... ..... .....m.m., i..t.M...13 34 —Kim loam, 5 to 9 percent slopes. , . _....... .:.........,al13 47 —Olney fine sandy loam, Al to 3 percent slopes.......14 References . ....:..............,..,..,r .......=..te..■4tFe ■■..18 4 How Soil Surveys Are Made Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length, and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainages the kinds of crops and native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other biological activity. Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource areas (MLRAs), NIILRAs are geographically associated land resource units that share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey areas typically consist of parts of one or more I ILRA, The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the area.. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they were formed. Thus, during mapping, this modelenables the soil scientist to predict with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a specific location on the landscape. Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented by an understanding of the soul -vegetation -landscape relationship, are sufficient to verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries. Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units). Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil 5 Custom Soil Resource Report scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and research. The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or laridform segments that have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas. Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map. The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of mapping. rrtensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape, and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are remade to test and refine the soil -landscape model and predictions and to verify the classifcation of the soils at specific locations_ Once the soil -landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded. These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color, depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurementsr such as those for content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil typically vary from one point to another across the landscape. Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other properties. Wh i l e a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field -observed characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management. Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same kinds of soil. Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example, soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date. After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and 6 Custom Soil Resource Report identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings, fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately. SMap The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit. 8 Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map :44 4Ce 444" I4 e 4'44'N 513333 SUM] 513010 S13:80 5131 I i I 1 I 513110 +ail niay..ynot be valid at this. stale. I I I i 513M0 513C.r 51305) 513 513100 513110 513120 513130 513140 513190 513 51 5'133 1 1 I f 5131) 513130 513140 513150 5/31en 513170 513187 51319D 513'3[0 513210 513220 Map Salle: 1.790 if printed on A Ia was (11" x8.5„) sheet. Meters N 0 1 Ct 20 A 40 60 c F: 7 t 0 35 70 141 210 Map Prol e: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGSR4 Edge tics: UTM Zone 13N WGS84 9 104° 5Q' 4r 5At 40© 4a ll.NJ 40° 414' N Custom Soil Resource Report MAP LEGEND Area of Interest (AOl) Area of Interest (AO1) Soils Soil Map Unit Polygons Soil Map Unit Lines O Soil Map Unit Points Special Point Features w x S i . 0 It a JAL 0 O 4 0 r 0 0 Blowout Borrow Pit Clay Spot Closed Depression Gravel Pit Gravelly Spot Landfill Lava Flow Marsh or swamp Mine or Quarry Miscellaneous Water Perennial Water Rock Outcrop Saline Spot Sandy Spot Severely Eroded Spot Sinkhole Slide or Slip Sodic Spot O L Spoil Area Stony Spot Very Stony Spot Wet Spot Other Special Line Features Water Features Streams and Canals Trans portation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background in Aerial Photography MAP IN FORMATION The soil surveys that comprise your AOl were mapped at 1:24,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale, Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. _ Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area_ A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA -ARCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below, Soil Survey Area: Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part Survey Area Data: Version 17, Sep 10, 2018 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50000 or larger_ Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Sep 20, 2018 —Oct 21. 2017 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps_ As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. 10 Custom Soil Resource Report Map Unit Legend Acres in AOI Percent of AOI Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name 1.0 31,6% 34 Kim loam, 6 to 9 percent slopes 47 Olney fine sandy percent slopes loam, 1 to 3 2.2 68.4% . 100,0% 3.2 Totals for Area of Interest Map Unit Descriptions The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area, The map unit descriptions, along with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit. A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class. Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic classes, consequently, every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils. Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and miscellaneous areas on the landscape. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the Iardscape Into landforrs or Iandfcrm segments that have similar use and management requirements, The delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however, 11 Custom Soil Resource Report onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas. An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions. Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil properties and qualities. Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement. Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness, salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series. Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas. These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups. A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar in all areas. Alpha -Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example. An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar. Alpha -Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example. 12 Custom Soil Resource Report Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part 34 —Kim loam, 5 to 9 percent slopes Map Unit Selling National map unit symbol: 362d Elevation: 4,900 to 5,250 feet Mean annual precipitation: 13 to 17 inches Mean annual air temperature: 46 to 52 degrees F Frost -free period: 125 to 150 days Farmland classification: Farmland of local importance Map Unit Composition Kim and similar soils: 90 percent Minor components: 10 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transacts of the mapunit. Description of Kim Selling Landfarm: Plains, alluvial fans Down -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Parent material: Mixed eolian deposits derived from sedimentary rock Typical profile H1 - 0 to 10 inches: loam H2 - 10 to 35 inches: loam H3 - 35 to 60 inches: fine sandy loam Properties and qualities Slope: 5 to 9 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Runoff class: Low Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 5.95 inlhr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of pondrng: None calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 15 percent Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 8.8 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 4e Land capability classification (nonirrlgated): 6e Hydrologic Soil Group: A Ecological site: Loamy Slopes (R067B 008CO) Hydrtc soil rating: No Minor Components Otero Percent of map unit: 6 percent l-lydric soil rating: No 13 Custom Soil Resource Report Valent nt Percent of map unit: 4 percent Hyclric soil rating: No 47 -Olney fine sandy loam, I to 3 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 362v Elevation: 4,600 to 5,200 feet Mean annual precipitation; 11 to 15 inches Mean annual air temperature: 46 to 54 degrees F Frost -free period: 125 to 175 days Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated and the product of I (soil erodi b i l ity) x C (climate factor) does not exceed 60 Map Unit Composition Olney and similar soils: 85 percent Minor components: 15 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Olney Setting Landform: Plains Down -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Parent material: Mixed deposit outwash Typical profile HI - 0 to 10 inches: H2 - 10 to 20 inches H3 - 20 to 25 inches. H4 - 25 to 60 inches fine sandy loam : sandy clay loam sandy clay loam ▪ fine sandy loam Properties and qualities Slope: 1 to 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Runoff class: Low Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (sat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 2.00 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of poncing: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 15 percent Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline sal i ne to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mm hos/cm) Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 7.0 inches) Custom Soil Resource Report Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 3e Land capability classification (non irrigated): 40 Hydrologic Soil Group: B Ecological site: Sandy Plains (ROG7BYO 4CO) Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Zigweid Percent of map unit: 10 percent Hydric soil rating: No Vona Percent of map unit: 5 percent Hydric soil rating: No References American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling and testing. 24th edition. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard 02487-00. Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deep -water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service FWS1O B S-79131. Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States. Federal Register. September 15, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States. Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 0.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric soils in the United States. National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries. Soil Sur +ey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18, hhttp://wwwnics.tisda.goviwps/portal/ nres/detaillnationallsoilsl' cid=nres 142p2_054262 Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http:// www,nres.usda.govlwpslportal/nresldetailtnationallsailsl?cid=nres142p2_053577 Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http :11 www.nres.usda,govlwps/portal/nres/detaillnatianallsoilst cid=nresl42p2_053550 "Finer, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands Section. United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical Report Y-87-1. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National forestry manual. http:lww. n res. u sd a . govlwpslpo rtallnres/detaillsoi l sl hornet' cid=nres142p2_053374 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National range and pasture handbook. http:lt ww.nres.usda.govlwpseportallnresl detai lin ation alilaf du selrangepastureOci d=stel prd b 1043034 16 Custom Soil Resource Report United States Department of Agridulture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National soil survey handbook, title 430 -VI. http://www.nres.usda.govlwpslportal/ arcs/detai l/soils/scientists/? cid = nresl 42p2_0 54242 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296. http://v w. n res. usd a, gov/wps/portal/n resld etai llnatio n al/s of l sl? ci d= n res 142 p2_05 3624 United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http:// www.nres.usda.gov/Internet1FSE_DOCUMENTS/nres142p2_D522GD.pdf 17 Ruiz, Tnung UT C APPENDIX C USGS Topographic Map U S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U S OEOLONCAL 3URIIIEY &Ma MOO* NNW Y7F'JP+• MIN I M a .24 r11 P ■ IN I. I i as I k a l I Rill. r a itsi iii ■ a I Y I 1 •m;n JOAN at 1 14.■ -4 14 out ltvolt a If • TII41 _1l.11ill li 1 PIl�l,ifu tilPSant — r1 's 10 n at I!1 t n I El r r a1 suit, tri11m Pt. Proposed Site NrStarib- LhwYsri1list IAA s18has t' tern( Iew% On r n l''.Jrifa a IYn,agala art42-10- t;JIs• en tan Alta I,e.4Iaiaald :1 1l11 PP.? ii• a i't are4a &sail it Lied reel aM IIa•s1 tag 1•d tsar .aalli.aara at VIIi .sil. aa...4.V'•• a /Iact Ian IS It YClara Met Bit ta•• • Iat I a, r• r p . r.. SYiblealt Mars Nara Sill .s.seism Ira ..ill ds.i Sled .•&a saw merry pant 9 pars lva p.hai. .et, !4.i, sin l.. •a cl. es. trim. MI a ilea V, or. wa Rita `V"'•f''-'1',r aGaasl %WWf1L ■at- Crap Pins F rs•M-i* fair:rl. n11 Il7.i{r..a adaaii ...PI*,-aa War w1wU- is yin.. x114 J.M. Iy,1 't.11a, I::Ca+ Cal, tin .1Iy . lls1. f.a*.Vi laIPa .t -a!i .Ill Caia frdr. ••'1 Wellman ••r Ott Y s•—• • r nr lt: t: �e9 vg, OM a a lit ilea at MR �� Ella atm• ■1 11&aa n . a •.1 :•I Sal sI • • .tt .ta ! t p" a1 • • 1 alai II at al 3 I a rt r ■i_ 2 I I, La ■1 Y a ■l I la ,a '14 1 .=.1..112: t1tt 'it 1 L.— ara..a PF441, I. I- .lilat./ .l i- -a-41n CIF 0 • Il t p PI to I'=a 1■ n J I l z 7 tia 'III i O30 SCALE 1.24944 Ffi i l.ei 1, •+all au It _,_!J,R Sn_ till er -- .i111 wy, + "Y ulia cons a prren 11 UST Mel MOWN M filled . D&rlaiffnla Mr la MI ar■d16sd 4t t•}4 a In op Waal ifaataa tent ot We TS Ionia ka'IW. !aI i Malatya■?I. aalralad Mal IA wair%%ll delft WM.. I I hi FORT LUPTON QUADRANGLE C ORACD 7 5-MIMUTE SERIES a II d 4.84 tti C E e MI ND WOWS It i Nair Wit LI ] On" - v, 6 Arbil ICI - a t Must lir lars Ira a .. gal . • 4. Lt i rtl a an amalgam. 4' soismaa I ■ II al 1 1 i I ■ ■ P li WI oat a:.aa Yt. r1 Baum -rob; I tah at".J as Lnnhhjlie 4Ia` tua . S. P 14 97?7 tits— ar •+ —4til r'•', man 'lama;xl hops ...I at ••• - as • '101 fasts FORT LUPTON, CO 4416 Y tie -91 1 ik 14i Roll, I$I a _ A Illllllllnr Y 'mow MINI" te MUM _o° ■ wag 11 �Ij Ruiz Trucking. LLC APPENDIX D FEMA Floodplain oodplain ap NOTES TO USERS 'a rain 4 a ► aWSW n T7 hakes a era I Stites note I inn sir wail we ..•4 •••••• rl Ire-• srro s. spec ssrWarr, lam esv On. iCvCJm. } +Jtr ace let autru*4 Ira ---palsn rs.4 or art%4 t lhana 4rt 1.1 if.M/res head hioasiatHWil. l 7,1 pW.l Mesta .rl\lrt131 r PeAnn Is Pad Mtdlithl tai*% seers. Ilaraltaps Rea limn ddar•,..+t. * II M', i'tly 111114 a dnil.l tea F.C.J.. +nn.a moor rare flair a t'it anus it .iS l•-eli mvalor •4444144 rain ti's •'a IC•t 'flearce ?14!11 tcr',r aftn ifs to 11R *AV 'J{rc Mora tti a n r,a1 Qllra7r Part a ti la w/eer•1 'Iaa.C.t .ha•'40• molars Itak ot, re ...mkt v •fa ■Para Ie pals air rd !Neel. we N .,I -'O se ea *Oa a0'+J•r It hNl ran .^trans!, a..1k1.letelr eJQa Iss s can perm a +f'va r15 swig parer) he 1 -wage+ •1 w1}t Us" 41r• cant __ HIM ES-nal• !'rail Mn I'fl eat V ete ere nor* e+ .as as: Asa Caere re loped •arhG •,. tire..! ..a kup41 aaa.'.a CO dwi.arrps Sea ..na--'•.... Aral ^nl.l it 7•. "..I-.ty It ^%sits dejehe testes w rew noon raessea 9ie ;en are N7► prim Amy E'a tasI l weer ••.r. to -.tens r 4almarr Ca erns ir•r Owe +-^I +• Are .laul m ira flnw n MN i i.m. a Peen — 4.i. lope -VIM HMI PIa .`!'A ?ler ]a.Fir ule arsiint'r of w iksri._,3 — empires a caw se. and rltrnamolri Seestr al .":•f' Pmts— TLe& is ea s a. ease it S aa'se s- V -1. .•H. eta T[ J'agrareii rj re an trees • im r.* tessera a'*41* p S Sr now rare-!.) -4 ring ra.a- «. - t ii resas ter_ Ilium 1s- ta P•elr'W4I lair :+'w• sea nal r Saul f Md head ire ••-r is P'oarso bat &..d chinar atnaille/a{ lal!b n $41lsltl 2 a Parr Pnuloral WS Jar S ihf a5ue411rirne' :4-14004sal glom e a rs aftla keta Mae artitil.'+1et1 Tlr Pagaasatt .rd aloe t►e C•a•n *iMP c1 viaa Ma lass ..saute ?lamaWitt Yr..I0X Vitt art I,. nit hnmaaatllarcs-.aa fu46 i1 •3R5 THfi) ..sepal Wiens in -seas spunk g eSrl 'a .3 Iona — n Ira tvsairrl to alias. Mr ei lead MatM1CM iW last Ja 141O4reredv iafirtial•••aa•i' 1rak nieberre et allay ,t•atigalar.Yl tanMiu.. ttllfarr••ii .t iS au ma atones el yes HMI -Wm ii axar'it 11th fa. 491 awraraSris t3liw Wan Amnon brichWinory Or aim 'floe.. SUM pas aloe! is caairs•atl b ailt•i as le•i lawra lob-ii.r. e.a.r+tw la Ma lose! •falleia dare rod 1110104410 I•Qaa kV �W.a•MM 'N1. teen Pal ttlt; $ GMMTii' I+51,1'W Vain M Illy Ord Ire Bath +ramaran 1-4„me Niue. 3 1704 teat Lr Iila.tW •'-`+•h line" strir4 ' "a¢ r e a�i --tpL,\ r ' mesh to .plan! !e-Cgo•44 ';•are* Jai Ins Ra sairg ..sheep 4L..% Ita,aoe lanais* 'iCrd Wrnit3•$4t: Sake 411 .da7Ol5 rip eta Via!, z• ui imp 76e_r ladsv qn.n Std.,/ St. rib W'a4ra;K's 5dt• II. -Kai t. baaan ..ainlo •nnstai ilms.vuloce rival mamas Itr}rti r- its ail iiat. •sari d• pea mall aims new esansaa Ina 41 r fa issf trt ,...Natal• tine, VI cairn 1)13 r years iteresev rMt_i•-t'Tbl'niNil• lama rape nj p ,j sew me a•. trio at. Arun •earl Mrriseaaarisma wrei raa.gr •an 7 in Se Iran Teas asm rr'mo}rrtl atria X 70 •'•- �+PIM harts tart I slip "a' a•w-'Ke her srFal4Mhp IU- T- • nee pas ygin rat pliers ayes he!BIona se-etrivell l.+i'hirmn II„c •.a peals i— — art ~a- -••Y aa..aa.. a i..karyay lase the Vein aretie-!, wn• •••}1•16 PIA suet tea 'oat tetra nara'ir•rrai aril etIlaaeat slap!- a ned Caairtaar i1r it -fit i is e- nasal 1 nil Sr ova labia!' tat 'ba•r7•P -••C •d+.ari.a 'tea l us -Ns -a•• 1•.•• ht .!veil!• = R4 sear ir► ar•I' Oder! 1 ....14.1.11 f. vise I! *are ar-l..r ralal.a..•Stia 4 a Irate lit at...a_-. •r► .mead well IS e• 'spire Sc,..aIh •, I a•Ir• marry. limb. 't'tar t lope# pees"+ JaWarates•a Inra'ra•L ilaJ t ••'a•• ..part -1 sea Avers aW i..n Mad mot• #11' I. aa•IM i /.fwr..•1 i1a'.••.{l :savor....! DAPS rl•ala Or MD awe a. Yawl r► Pe Pas lore. !•asap'+ a •hi seer a, espart is - e• din lLa w rowan r as aleas -.a 'ears iaaa.r•s ream Ili. Thaw Oa t aaart= Ire LASS WOO Wit im p iwnela Txin s.rsT (/{rips. ! art. reel sxnarS..O a• r1a+r- •alaa .ao • a lee •'I•P-+•I4 peas sr EMI kr sr !alma! SF c♦ Ms Ya•+t seise(' lee glace* /St trap art. !,Alai pis *me .arM•M1 tir,.a�',sp.' s. a [tine • .4 :O:•e rniatras a lit�r yriap•ti2 rawer max. �'aaianer• Ty. -+ it we In asp. gr..a-ar an pat a a treat t Les ?e — yea of misses ar•tstent s -s— •. urines .. • rasa ■ ar► alaa ti yea -- J•V •••• ain Na 4.1n.st4as• tear- a 'r -sal _Til -cress' Pint 'til aT tier 4!a ate- a 'f.'? 0 W Jaj, =la'Yr' 4 ' N ---=W- ^t'eu s1►" seas sets arise .1! tie -a inn t yea Ire.•!' .T T r•••- - •••as•r peas --i a'a'R'I a•.9 * soar Ins *seise a1a1d1 fPfr ram. rata ti Naps ant*. it --4. '.aa.-i ....11•4-SP•• ..-•.t— .••'. ea` a-. rat at. else-i'?t- War IMP IN a I t: Alt Mr' r AS YU- • i e• awn aUGsaie nIrlaeyiaa',a111a'Ow1L • G. .F t.' "Id''Si ge ar a6 . a " Ile. --h a k • ;ar • t I• r■ I1 .4111 r I ■ 4 a....s„•qtr-*•rlr!.r re, "1., 114fi • tv - a at .• THIS AREA SHOWN AT A. SCALE OFV - 500' ON MAP NUMBER 08/2302102 -tPrt ,T ose Site THIS AREA SHOWN AT A SCALE. 01- 1'' = 500' ON MAP NUMBER 0812302104 I - a". l.ai1- pinups? rr 9,baJlfarlFT Pion NAP *es ashy 4N'M! PAPEN ie LCC*Tta Mrleil ltfitlb! ■t NEST llorreAFT LEGEND Nit fatR a • ■ d • IRL4^ •••f Its to r a. r tier r- r:I tµfrl,-aaltter re 1y714a1. ;rat: it ,: :le rue .a rra••raa Alia/ kr i few r -•••••• 1aa -ID. •-c t-•- 1 •Veen/ n wooa Sem' rani••1•• • ..• e'-• re tn. r — peas a•.-•' w� w. 'M e•- .1`r'• r.rRti'% t. i 'f.-ew•ae .lie... V 'q..*-yL •eea'I •'•1/' a•a'•. I. ar tetra - 11a • .•I' a Mr id We awn Lappo 1ti:set to itoo Via .yr Wett a sae 'cai••.ass.- .7. tare* .L -ate Se •a its man ...r ate • 1 r a err s. ar Ms 4 le 1 'a .sloe mow•! a11r •• ••r i is r -fear rr•so": h r• Y•_ are r.'.,.. r -rte- -,..•.► par ... o -}r 5-rie en ••y- r+r -r+ aq+— •••• •arra••r-. -- a 'Iris J• eta a.. .10 P -I .h• N► -r- .nW I1.1% •'••rMl I S••• • rr•• Nees rr • e_n tee," or ass Nets 5w or pry* Joy . ---r eye. r•I•• .... 'o.► rm. a. I Or low• --M •T dam- .or -• Ste•. rn ..w,•+A...~WOW cis. aall as ti ii tea-. •• tas- a i M Tars >e ►r ..s air . -n ate! rIr• 'UK Mfrs" lrl,e'c 11+—n1.4 —n.--r.a.w..—•w r•a-r"'—.•.I..— Aware, a I... t. 4.r ..e ' 1 "me owe a ra [+ :ti rersJ'I- T-nd. Les a r.. •1J../4 ate! sob .pw1.1 t eve) r•ort% fi,Y I ia4 -4 halo • •.it I r4 .-J.• S. I O ••• a ■ -Ls-• I - _ - r q rope r'- Ws* i•slopr•"+'re-ass riIs,.Iyr•t.♦,re- 1T JMJentroiltPJa' T err,t r•. is• 'W! w., M1p•t Sit Pt( . (brat as ■ I+ 111 -r.fs1•.ra. anan-a• .P-1 a4rea>a r -i 1 — 4+e •PIPOS !aa a' -c--- —I IM•1•11 WAAL_. b•NICE1+ w`ltjtt 5437/111 eci 4>�la 1' t't- c fedreo T14 +Srlli'C'TP Mal -As fa'eJ? r: ear *we .0.e. S a'dgi s ate tar Si laa ••. Slat Sr SS SS t a ea•.•••aa•► as -' f rrrrr xt r. Ja r ► f. :1n t...—J•.—�•'..seea raN ••.ad 4r :a_i t dlr5 ++a• L.,a -Mt par a . ,• err w I a•a 4raIra•• Nola Writ- J •sX ••&M" •�_. K,� _. it- •-r tie a.41•••,•-• air-! lope ea. as lone.! • Mir • r :ai tea +i -tF a --- Ora lei-^•�• *arrant a err•+ammtt taarra alit ..•. c. •tam• '•i..al•• . arr. titre. Cara vassal -rye G lett a v•s lora.n:lt� i •71 iI •.- ...sepias &alt"Imo IS Tror -t!it • ea fir 4. r '•• t. rs..r • or as I -. ..nor-. wag-1-...tmeta I I.. S-..'i'ii a. Mn { -ells t at 'flaw. r. j71.n1 as 3•AllIa ernes re.i.n -at, MICA- P rrlJlaCIPT t era. err. ..p••.. • r —a--. -d •-...,.r.• ..—a rr. - roam L.I• - .al .4—i •'ass a 1J•s i•-eLi ova'-aa s-. c 4r IllatinsLP !- alp r 4 aye '_- V e Me a t • Y le I s. •tr ■• a I ern f14 *a OWE FIRM uisURkIIce ROE INA P` WELD COLS NT Y. COLt0RADO Fyn �'ti+ctlk,IWI+t4T4XI %Ri,a% PASSEL li6SQF 2230• 1 L 1,t,1 IN'+EJt f{a r fiir 1•tiEL i *rOul; Isla aye IrlJfr Tale Msl Matt ten Iona tlo.it b fill molt. IMaaa+a yak alas* ma casvpiwe -Iasi,..! n amour r a1r10.i7 tap y µflu a7i !pasha. arprdlaa• iY Its i•[ir ' 3 iWraral•4 11 A N;ALMA MI Pie Pi ME EfaCIPII GATE SWUM, ? ZV1! I' al :•11 rte ktel•a5i elm il ILO'•= I Ruiz .Truck iv a. LIE APPENDIX B NOAA Atlas 14 Precipitation Data 3/7/2019 Precipitation Frequency Data Server NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 8, Version 2 Location name: Fort Lupton, Colorado, USA* Latitude: 40.0795% Longitude: -104.8459° Elevation: 4950.85 ft** source: ESRI Maps "* source: USGS POINT PRECIPITATION FREQUENCY ESTIMATES Sanja Perica, Deborah Martin, Sandra Paviovic, Ishani Roy, Michael St. Laurent Carl Trypaluk, Dale Unruh, Michael Yekta, Geoffery Bonnin N0AA, National Weather Service, Silver Spring, Maryland PFJabular I PF,g P— I kigps,81 •aeriala PF tabular 'PD -based point precipitation frequency estimates with 90% confidence intervals (in inches)1 Duration Average recurrence interval {years) 2 5 10 25 50 0,230 5 -min (0.177-0.298) 0337 (0.259.0.437) 0.411 (0.316-0.533) 10 -min 15 -min 0.280 ' 0.377 0.410 (0.216-0.364) (0.259-0.4910) (0.359-0.615) 0,620 (0.468-0.865) 0.410 0.551 0.689 0.907 (0.316-0.533) (0.423-0.7181 (0.5260.901) (0.685-1.27) 0.500 (0.385-0.650) 30 -min 0.612 (0.516-0.876) 0.559 0.678 0,908 (0.431-0.726) (0.622.0.881) (0,697-1.18) 60 -mm n 2 -hr 3 -hr 6 -hr 0.683 (0.526-0.886) 0.806 (0.628-1.03) 0.840 1.11 (0.641-1.10) (0.835.1.55) 1.13 1.49 (0.864-1.48) (1.13-2.08) 0.827 1.11 (0.637-1.07) (0.850-1.44) 1.38 (1.06-1.81) 1.83 (1.38-2.56) 0,975 1.31 (0,759-1,25) (1.01-1.68) 1.64 (1.28-2.11) 2,16 (1.65-2.99) 0,751 (0.550-1.05) 1.10 (0.805-1.54) 1.34 (0.982-1,88) 1,81 (1.33-2.64) 2.22 (1.63-3.12) 100 200 300 1000 0.896 (0.634-1.29) 1.06 1.29 - 1.49 (0.719-1.56) (0.846.1.95) (0.942-2.25) 1,3+1 1.55 129 2.18 (0.928-1.89) (1.05-2.28) (1.24-2.86) (1.36-3.30) 0.872 (0.684-1.11) 1.03 (0.819-1.30) 1,051 1.41 (0.824-1.34) I (1.10-1.80) 1.23 1.62 (0.974-1.55) (1.28-2.04) 1.76 (1.37-2.26) 2.00 (1.57-2.54) 12 -hr 1,27 1.49 1.91 (1.02-1.58) (1.19-1.85) (1.52-2.38) 24 -hr 2.32 (1.794.19) 2.63 (1.95.3.66) 2.83 (2.11-3.90) 1.60 (1.13-2.30) 2.16 (1.53-3.10) 1.89 (1.28-2,78) 2.55 (1.74-3.76) 2.31 (1.51-3.49) 3.12 (2.044.72) 2.66 (1,68-4.02) 3.60 (2.28-5.44) 2,66 3,14 (1.88-3.82) (2.14-4.64) 3.86 (2.52.5.83) 3.15 (2.26-4,48) 2.61 (2.03-3.54) 3,16 (2.38-4.29) 2.32 2.96 (1.84-2.90) (2.32-3.94) 1,51 1.79 I 2.30 (1.23-1.86) (1.45-2,21) (1,85-2.83) 2 -day 2.76 I 3.45 (2.21-3.41) (2.71-4.48) 1.72 2.09 2.72 (1.41-2.09) (1.71-2,54) (2.22-3.31) 3 -day 1.88 (1.55-2.26) 3.26 4.03 (2.64-3.99) (3.17-5.10) 4 -day 2.01 (1,68-2.40) 2.30 7-d"ay j(1.92.2.73) 2.26 1 2.90 (1.86-2.72) (2.38-3.50) 2.38 3.02 (1.97-2.86) (2.49-3.63) 2,69 (2.25-3.20) I10 -day 2.35 3.26 20 -day I (2,77-3,80) 2.96 (2.49-3.49) 3.45 (2.81-4.18) 4.22 (3.35-5.31) 3.53 (2.69-4.72) 4.04 (3.09-5.29) 4,64 (3.57-5.94) 4.84 (3.75-6.15) 3.38 (2,44-4.77) 3.74 (2.57-5.44) 4.59 (3.04.6.84) 4.45 (2.82-6.73) 5.30 (3.39-7.91) 4.01 4.93 5.89 (2.78-5.79) (3.26-7.29) ' (3.66-8.42) 4.44 5.43 8.26 (3.11-6.32) (3.66-7.92) (4.07.9.13) 6,71 (442-9.65) 3.76 (2.74-5.23) io 3.57 4.35 (2.92.4.31) (3.46-5.43) 3.35 3.91 (2.78-3.98) (3.23-4,67) 3.65 4.22 (3.05-4.31) (3.52-6.02) 30 -day I45 -day 3.83 (3.28-4.42) 4.50 (3.88-5.16) 3.73 (3.174.35) 4.36 (3.73-5,05) 5.15 (4.43-5.91) 4,51 (3.81-5.26) 5,15 (4.34-6.03) 4.70 (3.78-5.81) 4.97 (3.87-6.28) 416 (3.06-5.69) 4.67 (3.46-6.26) 5.26 (3,92-6.90) 4.86 (343-6,80) 5.35 (3.81-7.35) 5.87 (3.99-8.42) 6.32 (4.33.8.90) 5.92 (4.24-7.96) 5834 (4.19-6.67) 5.04 (4.07-6.17) 6.04 (4.93-7.27) 5,24 (4,464.07) 5.95 (5.05.6.93) 6.94 (5.69-8.26) 5.69 (4.49-7.05) 6.73 (5,37-8.20) 6.18 (5.31-7.11) 7.02 (5.99-8.10) 60 -day 5.06 r (4.38-526) j 5,81 (5.02-6.63) 7.00 (6.04-8.01) 7.96 (6.83-9.14) 8.15 (6.72-9.61) 9.24 (7.64-10.8) 7.68 (6.17-9.27) 8.99 (7.26-10.7) 5.48 (4.11-7.12) 5.61 (4.23-7.25) 5.99 (4.56-7.65) 6.36 (4.86-8.04) 7.43 (5.74.9.25) 8.43 (6.55-10.4) 6.14 (4.43-8A 8) 6.81 7.11 (4.73-10.1) 7.51 (4.70-9.40) 7 (5.05-10.5) 7,04 7.74 (4.89-9.62) (5.24-10.7) 6.28 (4,55-8.32) 7.20 (5.03-9.78) 7.91 (5.38-10.9) 6.67 7.60 8.32 (4.88-8.73) (5.35-10.2) (5.71-11.3) 4 7.03 7.96 8.67 (5.17-9.13) (5.64-10,6) (5.99-11.7) 9,82 (7.68-12.0) 8.13 (6.04-10.4) 9.18 (6.86-11.6) 9.08 (6,50-11.9) 9,79 (6.85-13.0) 10.6 (8.00-13.3) 10.2 10.9 (7.32.13.1) (7.67-14.3) 11.7 (8.48-15.0) 10.2 (8.26-12,1) 11.1 (8.72-13.4) 12.0 13.1 (9.06-14.9) (9.56-16.7) 12.5 (5.84-16.2) 140 (9.94.18.0) 1 Precipitation frequency (PF) estimates in this table are based on frequency analysis of partial duration series (PDS). Numbers in parenthesis are PF estimates at lower and upper bounds of the 90% confidence interval. The probability that precipitation frequency estimates (for a given duration and average recurrence interval) will be greater than the upper bound (or less than the lower bound) is 5%. Estimates at upper bounds are not checked against probable maximum precipitation (PIMP) estimates and may be higher than currently valid KAP values. Please refer to NOAA Atlas 14 document for more information. Back to Tort https:llhdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/pfds printpage,htrnl71at=40.+0795&Ion=-104.8459&data=depth&units=eriglish&series=pads 1/4 3/7/2019 Precipitation depth (in) 14 12 10 . • • f • • °T T • • • . . • • • • a • d • • • a. Precipitation Frequency Data Server PF graphical PDS-based depth -duration -frequency (DDF) curves Latitude: 40.0795°, Longitude: -104.8459° 4. ♦ • b. • .; • $ r c + c E 0 LA T • . it 1 �! ♦ • 4 � 1 • • • • : • • a • • • • • • • • . A • • • • —71 - I I I I t Irs I nil Duration ma 913 eq Ri �ft ea fa �Q rt! t*J I ti 4 A 6 Average recurrence interval (years) 5 10 25 50 100 200 500 1000 NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 8. Version 2 Created (GMT): Thu Mar 7 21:35:04 2019 sack to Toj Maps & aerials Small scale terrain Average recurrence rnter4I (years} 1 2 5 10 25 50 100 200 500 ( 1000 Duration 5-rnm 1 O—imn 15 -min 30 -mm 60 -min 2 -hr 3 -tug 6 -hr 12 --hr 24 -hr 2 -day 3 -day 4 -day 1 -day is 10 —day 20..day 30 -day 45 -day 60 -day https:llhdsc. twos. noaa•govlhdsc/pfds1pfdsprintpage,htmI?lat=4g •0795& Icon=-104.8459&data=depth&units=eng lish&series=pad s 3/7/2019 Precipitation Frequency Data Server • r Fort Lu tort' 3km rift Large scale terrain {'4 .ore A • •S Minn 0 / 1 For tcoli rrbs • a rea Lon;. Peak •13its m �.:�... Boulder 3 1L a - I I , '` ...' -:�I s l*pa - t 4r/ •.�• VIII. r V> .!ice' t • i Jr of •: a1 p :+. 100 km • Cheytnne Greeley a (+ MOM 4Mt is raw ,Lenver ammi- • N MINIM Large scale map -*%h7L. Fort wino 100km in Greeley add, er se o orad6 Spr'i njc- Large scale aerial yeetetelacre hops://hdsc,n rs.noaa.goer/hdscipfdslpfds printpage.html?lat=40,079584Ion=-104.$459&data=cl pthatunits=english&series=pds 3/4 3x/2019 Precipitation Frequency Data Server US partment of Cornmerc National Oceanic and Airnosplieric Administration National weather Service 1325 East West Highway Silver Spring, MD 20910 Questions?: HaSC.QuesIionsc noaa‘gov Disclaimer hitps:l/l dscanwssnoaa..govihdseipfdsipids_rintpage.l trnl?ia.t=40.0795 rQn=-104,84 98data=depthr&units=english&s ries=pals 4/4 Ruiz Trucking APPENDIX F Percentage of ` Imperviousness Calculation AGPROfessionals CnI'I RS 01: :14t:tturuu:f l`Itt• 3050 67th Avenue, Suite 200 Greeley, Co 80634 Telephone (970) 535-9318 www.agpros.com Project Number: 2625-02 Designed By: AGPROfessionals Checked By: CT V Date: 3/7/19 4:45 PM Sheet: of Subject: Impervious Area Calculation Overall Proposed Basin User Entry Solving for the Percent Impervious (I): Impervious Total SqFt Acres impervious Description per UDFCD Table 6-3 Roofs 90% 7,841 0.16 Drive and Walk 90% 436 0.01 Gravel Road 40% 94,961 0.87 None 0% 0.00 None 0% 0.00 None 0% 0.00 None 0% 0.00 None 0% 0.00 None 0% 0.00 None 0% 0.00 None 0% 0.00 None 0% 0.00 None 0% 0.00 None 0% 0.00 None 0% 0.00 None 0% 0.00 Souare Feet 103,237 Acres Impervious Acres 45,433 ..Total 1.04 Total Development Acres 103,237 2.37 Development %I Actual Design 44% Ruiz Tnuckin „ LLC APPENDIX UDFCD Runoff Calculation DETENTION VOLUME BY THE MODIFIED FAA METHOD Project: Ruiz Trucking, LLC Basin ID: Pro )o.sed'. Runoff - (Pcx caic.hrtnents less drain 100 acres only, For larger catchment*, tin (hydrogreph Taut' n, (NOTE: for catchments larger than 90 acres, CUHP hydrograph and routing are recommended) method] Determination of MAJOR Detention Volume Using Modified FAA Method Determination of MINOR Detention Volume Using Modified FAA Method ally an Information iinnutU, [ slum r !onrafloat 1pr1w'll: Catchment Drainage Imperviousness I.= 44 00 percent Calehmant Drainage Imperviousness is s 4400 porcant Catchment Drainage. Area A 4 2 37D acres Catchment Drainage Area A =! 217 acres Predeveiapment MRCS sod Group Tea = it A, 8, C, or C Predevefopment MRCS Sid Group Type 4I a i EEC, or 0 Return Period for Detention Control T = _ lug years (Z, 5, 1D, 25, 50, or 100) Return Period roc Detention Control I =r 10. yam* (2, 5, 10, 25, 50, cr 100M Time of Concentration nr Watershed To = 13 minutes Time of Conoantration of Watershed Teel_ rranAt:Qi Adlewebbe OM RefeaNr Rah, cl= _ clt amo Allowable Unrt Release Rate q -J _t3 DM icfaimere .0' I One -hour Precipitation p, _ 1 38 inches Cane -hour Precrpttetxan P1= 2:S3 ,fix Design Rainfall IDF Formula i IP Cie PiriC2+Ta'Ca Coefficient One Cr = 2150 Design Rainrall I0F Formula I x Ci' PiI(c2+TelAC3 Coefficient One Cp la 213 50 Coefficient Two C2= 10 Coefficient Two C.; = 1Q' _ Coefficient Three Ca, = b 7'80 y Coefficient Three Ca = 0100 _ _ Dettpunination or mverrige utt1.4u�r fern xt�e resin i'Dei�uiatcd); fe1erni natlon of Avctage (utflowr from the as4n ( -3Ioulat: ll; Runoff Coefficient C at Ll 38 Runoff Coefficient C = Il 51 Inflow Peak Runoff Op -in =I 7,72 Tats Inflow Peak Runoff Op -in 4 2,08 $efa mired spreadsheet xis, Modified FM 317/2010, 4:47 PM Project; Ruiz Truckling, LLC Basin ID: Propoaed Runoff Inflow and Outflow Volumes vs. Rainfall Duration Volume (acre-feet) 0.45 0.4 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 S r r.. _ f' _ f `dr i I -k_. ! a le a IA A aA A A SA i i i A. 4 4 4 4 d A A b 0 50 100 150 200 Duration (Minutes) 250 300 _•{ kin ir,N7i Vasa T Rill P•1'WET L?. 'I. II t a-. Siang+ Vr&aa t Maki bon. Weir Yaadir }1- r.AJ.• I t*ir ma diaa4+Yvan* 350 UDFCD DETENTION BASIN VOLUME ESTIMATING WORKBOOK Version 2 34, Released November 2013 udfcd spreadtheel xJa, Modified FAA 31712019, x:47 PM Preliminary Drainage Report For Ruiz Trucking, LLC Being Part of the SW 1/a of Section 1, Township 1N, Range 67 W of the 6th P.M. AGPROfessionals DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE AGPROfessionals 3050 67th Avenue Greeley, CO 80634 (970) 535-9318 4/8/2019 Ruiz Trucking, LLC Table of Contents Certifications....... ..#ii44.iii.4..........444.#.4.4...f.4.444.4iirf...4..444.4... 444.... i X4444...444...44....... •.44444 Introduction414•+.949 iii.9.+ 4i 494 +4+ 4444+40..+t+*4* *4**44.4*494++4949 •i• 494 i 4i 4.4+4+444+•449444+9.9++•444+++494•+4.4.1 1 . Location ••.... •••... •••... iDS i ••.... •• DOOM. . i • 5 2. Description of Property •..•....•••...•••...•• 9.999• 5 Drainage Basin and. Sub -Basins...................•.•..... 6 9999 •••......... •••9999 1. Major Basin Description... ****** 0400 * 0 ** I) ** el *** ********* o 9.+9.999•++.99•••.4.•+•6.6•++...+ 2. Sub -Basin Description .4•.#494+•+949+•4494•+i9.i+14.4+•• 444+4+444444494+4+449++4444.+4.9.•4.9494 6 Drainage Design Criteria - ..........6... ....... 7 1. Development Criteria •••9999 .•99997 2. Hydrological Criteria ........•••....•...........••....••... • 7 3 5 3. Hydraulic Criteria .••• •... •••...4•....4......• 8 Drainage Facility Design en 1. General Concept 2. Specific Details 4 • 4. 444+4+4444+4444+4444*.i444+4+949+444944. 9 .•s 9 Conclusions .w..11 1. Compliance with Weld County Code 11 2■ 1rainage Concept.■.••..•••.........•.4..■ 1 1 List of References 12 Appendices Ruiz Trucking, LIE Certifications I hereby certify that this drainage report for Ruiz Trucking, LLC ., amended USR was prepared under my direct supervision in accordance with the provisions of the Weld County stpr drainage criteria for the owners thereof. i Wit. Chad Teelde, P �. AGPROfessionals 4/8/2019 Preliminary Drainage Report Page 3 of 12 AGPROfessionals, 3050 67th Avenue, Greeley CO 80634 * 970-535-9318 * www.agpros.com Ruiz Trucking, LIE CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE ENGINEERING DESIGNED TO WELD COUNTY CODE STANDARDS AND CRITERIA I Chad TeVelde , Consultant Engineer for Ruiz Trucking, LLC. ("Applicant"), understand and acknowledge that Applicant is seeking land use approval of Use By Special Review ("Application") for the property described in the attached Exhibit "A." I have designed or reviewed the design ("Design") for the proposed land use set forth in the Application. I hereby certify, on behalf of Applicant that the Design will meet all applicable drainage requirements of the Weld County Code with the exception of variance(s) described below. This certification is_ ai a tguarantee or warranty either expressed or implied. mac... (Engineer's Stamp) Engineer of Record Signature VARIANCE REQUEST 1) Describe the Weld County Code criteria of which a variance is being requested. 2) Describe why it is not possible to meet the Weld County Code. 3) Describe the proposed alternative with engineering rational which supports the intent of the Weld County Code. I understand and agree that the intention of the Code is to reduce impacts of development on neighboring downstream properties and the public. I understand if this variance request is approved it is not precedent setting and is based on site specific constraints. Planning Director Approval indicated when signed by director or appointee: Planning Director Name Signature Date of approval 4/8/2019 Preliminary Drainage Report Page 4 of 12 Ruiz Trucking, LLC Introduction 1. Location The proposed site is in part of the 1 of Section 1, Township 1 North, Range 67 West, of the 6th PM. This site is located approximately one and one half miles west of Highway 85 and directly west of Fort Lupton, CO. Highway 52 borders the property to the north. The properties surrounding the east and south side of the property are zoned agricultural and the property on the west side is zoned commercial. A vicinity map is shown in Appendix A. 2. Description of Property The applicant is proposing the development of the 2.37 acre parcel. The proposed site is currently a non -urbanizing, agricultural property. There is an existing 1404 SF manufactured home surrounded by bare earth. The existing manufactured home will be used as an office. A 4,800 SF garage is proposed to allow the storage of trucks indoors. Parking is proposed to the south and east of the existing residence on improved gravel surfaces. Additional on -site parking will be available for employees. The bare earth surrounding the gravel surfaces will be seeded with native grasses. There are two types of soil: Kim Loam (5 to 9 percent slopes) and Olney fine sandy loam (1 to 3 percent slopes). The majority of the soil is well drained, hydrologic soil group B (see USDA-NRCS Custom Soil Resource Report in Appendix A). There are no major open channels within or adjacent to the proposed property. An irrigation ditch borders the property on the east. 4/9/2019 Preliminary Drainage Report Page 5 of 12 AGPRofessionals, 3050 67`}` Avenue, Greeley CO 80634 * 970-535-9318 * www.agpros.com Ruiz Trucking, LLC Drainage Basin and Sub -Basins 1. Major Basin Description The proposed site is urbanizing and is located in rural Weld County. A Master Drainage Plan for the site area is not currently available. The proposed site was considered as one major drainage basin with one detention pond. The site has a relatively flat topography with slopes ranging from approximately three to five percent predominately towards the east. Water historically flows east to the irrigation ditch bordering the property. A topographic map was downloaded from the United States Geological Survey (USES) website and is shown in Appendix A. Historically, there have been no previous drainage issues with the property. A Federal Emergency Management Administration (FERIA) map of the project area is included in Appendix A. The property is located on panel 08123 C 1575E and is not currently located within a 100 -year floodplain. Offsite design flows from the north are intercepted by Highway 52. Offsite flows from the west flow east to the property boundary and are diverted to the north borrow ditch by a swale. Offsite flows from the south flow southeast away from the site. Offsite flows from the east flow west but are intercepted by the irrigation ditch. Offsite flows from the southwest, at the entrance of the property are anticipated to flow onsite. This area is labeled OS -1 on the Drainage Plan. The additional flow from OS -1 has been accounted for in the design of the detention pond. 2. Sub -Basin Description The site was evaluated with the one major drainage basin. The major drainage basin has two onsite sub -basins (Subbasin A and Subbasin B) and one offsite sub -basin (Subbasin OS -1). Subbasin A is the northwestern area of the major drainage basin and flows to a grass swale. Subbasin B is the southeastern area of the major drainage basin and includes the detention pond. Stormwater runoff from Subbasin OS -1 sheet flows through Subbasin B. Subbasin B continues to sheet flow to the detention pond. 4/9/2019 Preliminary Drainage Report Page 6 of 12 AGPROfessionals, 3050 67`}` Avenue, Greeley CO 80634 * 970-535-9318 * www.agpros.com Ruiz Truckinz, LLC Drainage Design Criteria 1. Development Criteria The proposed site runoff was evaluated using the criteria set forth in the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District (UDFCD) Criteria Manual Volumes 1, 2 and 3 and the Weld County Engineering and Construction Criteria Guidelines (WCECG) manual. 2. Hydrological Criteria From NOAA Atlas 14 Fort Lupton, CO precipitation station, the estimated rainfall from the 100 -year, 1 -hour precipitation is 2.66 inches (see NOAA Atlas 14 Precipitation Data in Appendix A). This value was used for runoff calculations. Percentage of imperviousness was determined using the recommended values from UDFCD Table 6-3. The overall percentage of imperviousness for the proposed site was determined to be approximately 40 percent (see Percentage of Imperviousness Calculation in Appendix A). Using the 10 -year, 1 -hour and 100 -year, 1 -hour design storm and the UDFCD Detention Basin spreadsheet, the peak runoff flowrate was estimated using the Modified FAA method. The peak runoff flowrate was calculated using the time of concentration (from LD-Rational v.1.02a spreadsheet), runoff coefficient, and the precipitation depth in the UDFCD spreadsheet for the Historical Total (see UDFCD Historical Runoff Calculation in Appendix A). Using the 10 -year, 1 -hour and 100 -year, 1 -hour design storm and the CD -Rational spreadsheet, the peak runoff flowrate was estimated for the Subbasins that flow to the Detention Basin. The sum of the Subbasins peak flows were used to calculate the total proposed peak runoff for the basin. (see LTD Rational Runoff Calculations in Appendix A). The peak runoff flowrate was determined to be approximately 8.45 cubic feet per second (cfs). Table 1: Peak Runoff Flowrates Peak Runoff Flowrate 10 Year Peak (cfs) 100 Year Peak Flowrate (cfs) Historic -Total 1.30 5.32 Proposed- ubbasin A 0.51 1.96 Proposed-Subbasin B 1.98 5.84 Proposed-Subbasin 0S-1 0.21 0.65 Proposed -Total 2.70 8.45 cfs = cubic feet per second 4/9/2019 Preliminary Drainage Report Page 7 of 12 AGPROfessionals, 3050 67`}` Avenue, Greeley CO 80634 * 970-535-9318 * www.agpros.com Ruiz Trucking, LLC 3. Hydraulic Criteria The 5 -year historic release rate was determined using the area of the proposed site and an estimated two percent historic imperviousness (see 5 -Year Historic Release Rate calculation in Appendix B). The volume required for the proposed detention pond was calculated to be 0.28 acre-feet. The release rate was calculated to be 0.49 cubic feet per second. The required detention volume was calculated using the Modified FAA method from the UDFCD Detention Basin Volume Estimating Workbook (see L�DFCD Detention Volume calculation in Appendix B). The proposed detention pond will have a capacity greater than the required 0.28 acre-feet at the 100 -year water surface elevation with an additional 1 foot of freeboard (see Table 2 and UDFCD Stage Storage in Appendix B). Table 2: Stage Storage Summary Pond Stage (Drainage Basin 1) Elevation (feet) Volume (acre-feet) WQCV 4988 0.067 100-Year/Spillway Crest 4988.80 0.314 Top of Pond 4998.80 0.674 An orifice plate is proposed for the outlet structure that is designed to release the water quality capture volume (WQCV) over 40 hours. The WQCV is included within the detention volume for the 100 -year storm. A restrictor plate is proposed to control the flowrate through the outlet culvert (see UDFCD WQCV and UDFCD Restrictor Plate calculations in Appendix B). A single stage outlet structure is proposed with a rectangular opening and a 12 -inch reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) culvert (see UDFCD Outlet Structure and UDFCD Outlet Culvert in Appendix B). A spillway is proposed that is designed to release the 100 -year peak flowrate. The spillway crest will be at or above the invert of the freeboard elevation and the depth of the flow should be less than six inches (see UDFCD Spillway in Appendix B). The detention pond is rectangular in shape on the east side. Subbasin A sheet flows north to a grass lined swale. The grass lined swale was sized to capture the 100 -year, 1 -hour runoff plus 1 foot of freeboard (see NRCS Swale Calculations in Appendix B). A rock chute was designed for riprap protection for the channelized flow (see NRCS Rock Chute Design in Appendix B). Subbasin B and OS -1 sheet flows to the detention pond, no culverts or grass lined swales are proposed for this area. An outlet culverts is proposed in the outlet structure (see Table 3). The culvert was sized within the outlet structure to release the historic 5 -year storm event. Rip rap protection was calculated to prevent erosion using the UDFCD Culvert spreadsheet. The headwater to diameter ratio is less than one for the 10 -year design storm for each culvert. A Manning's n of 0.013 was used in calculations for a concrete pipe per the WCECG. The 4/9/2019 Preliminary Drainage Report Page 8 of 12 AGPROfessionals, 3050 67`}` Avenue, Greeley CO 80634 * 970-535-9318 * www.agpros.com Ruiz Trucking, LLC culvert design and rip rap sizes were determined using the UDFCD Culvert spreadsheet. Calculations for the culvert capacity and rip rap sizing are included in Appendix B. Table 3: Culvert Sinnmary Culvert Diameter (inches) Material Slope (percent) Outlet 12" Reinforced Concrete Pipe 0.8 Drainage Facility Design 1. General Concept A detention pond is proposed along the eastern side of the site. Runoff should generally sheet flow towards the pond. The pond is designed to detain the 100 -year storm event and release at the 5 -year historic rate. The site should not significantly alter the historic drainage pattern. A general drainage plan, drainage and erosion control plan and drainage and erosion control details are shown in Appendix C. 2. Specific Details Maintenance access is provided on the southwest corner of the pond. A. Scheduled Maintenance of Proposed Facilities Scheduled maintenance will occur during daylight, weekday hours. Routine maintenance will include but should not be limited to the following: • Mowing of the bank slopes and area around the pond on a monthly basis during the growing season and as needed during the cooler months. • The outfall structure from the pond and other areas shall be inspected monthly for debris which could inhibit the proper flow of discharge. Any debris shall be removed immediately and disposed of or placed in a location to prevent future maintenance and to not cause impact up or downstream of the structure. • Trash shall be removed from around the pond to prevent entering the pond. Generally, the site should be kept free of loose trash which could be carried off site by wind or rain. • Inspect the pond and outfall structure for non -routine maintenance need. B. Periodic or Non -Scheduled Maintenance of Proposed Facility Periodic or non-scheduled maintenance includes routine inspection of the pond area and discharge/outfall structures to identify needed repairs and non -routine maintenance.. These items may include but should not be limited to the following: • Pond area and outfall structure should be inspected after significant storm events. • Re -growth of trees on or around the pond bank. These should be cut and removed from the pond area. 4/9/2019 Preliminary Drainage Report Page 9 of 12 AGPROfessionals, 3050 67`}` Avenue, Greeley CO 80634 * 970-535-9318 * www.agpros.com Ruiz Trucking, LLC • Sediment from the site may accumulate in the pond bottom and reduce the pond to below design volume requirements. The pond should be excavated if the pond bottom elevation reached a level that allows excessive aquatic growth or reduces the pond efficiency such that the sediments are passing the discharge structure and release off site. • Stabilization or re -grading of side slopes may be required periodically or after excessive rain events. Any disturbance of slopes should be reseeded or may require installation of erosion control materials until seeding can reestablish adequate grasses to prevent future erosion. • Any other maintenance or repairs which would minimize other maintenance to the pond or outfall structure. If the pond is significantly impaired such that the pond is incapable of properly functioning to meet the Weld County stormwater discharge requirements, the owner should assess the corrective action needed and have the pond restored by properly trained personnel. 4/9/2019 Preliminary Drainage Report Page 10 of 12 AGPROfessionals, 3050 67`}` Avenue, Greeley CO 80634 * 970-535-9318 * www.agpros.com Ruiz Trucking, LLC Conclusions 1. Compliance with Weld County Code The drainage design of Ruiz Trucking, LLC USR is consistent with the Weld County Engineering and Construction Guidelines and the Weld County Code. A detention pond is proposed along the eastern side of the property. 2. Drainage Concept Historical flow patterns and run-off amounts should be maintained in such a manner that should reasonably preserve the natural character of the area and prevent property damage of the type generally attributed to run-off rate and velocity increases, diversions, concentration and/or unplanned ponding of storm run-off for the 100 -year storm event. The drainage design included in this report should be effective in controlling damage from the design storm runoff by detaining the 100 -year, 1 -hour storm event and releasing at the 5 -year historic rate. No irrigation companies or property owners should be affected by the proposed development. 4/9/2019 Preliminary Drainage Report Page 11 of 12 AGPROfessionals, 3050 67`}` Avenue, Greeley CO 80634 * 970-535-9318 * www.agpros.com Ruiz Trucking, LLC List of References Federal Emergency Management Agency. "FEMA Flood Map Service Center." FEMA Flood Map Service Center. FEMA, 20 Jan. 2016. Web. 7 March 2019. https://msc.fema.gov/portal>. United State Department of Agriculture — Natural Resources Conservation Service. Hydraulics Formula. Computer Software. Hydraulics Formula Version 2.2.1. United State Department of Agriculture — Natural Resources Conservation Service. Rock Chute Design Program. Computer Software. Version WI -July -2010. <https://www.nres.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs 142p2_024307.xis>. United States Department of Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service. "Web Soil Survey." Web Soil Survey. USDA - NRCS, 2006. Web. 7 March 2019. <http ://web soilsurvey. sc. e gay. usda . gov/App/web S oil S urvey. aspx>. United States Department of Commerce - National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. "NOAA's National Weather Service." Point Precipitation Frequency Estimates. USDC - NOAA National Weather Service. Web. 7 March 2019 <https://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/pfds_printpage.html?lat=40.3194c ion= - 104.7041 .data=depth&units=english&series=pds>. United States Geological Survey. "Maps." Overview - Maps, United States Geological Survey. USGS, 2016. Web. 7 March 2019. <www.usgs.gov/products/maps/topo-maps>. Urban Drainage and Flood Control District. Calculation of Peak Runoff Using Rational Method. Computer software. Software. Vers. 1.02a. <http:l/udfcd.org/software>. Urban Drainage and FloodControl District. Detention Basin Volume Estimating Workbook. Computer software. Software. Vers. 2.34. http://udfcd.orglsoftware>. Urban Drainage and FloodControl District. Determination of Culvert Headwater and Outlet Protection. Computer Software. UD-Culvert Vers. 3.05. http ://udfcd. arg/software>. Urban Drainage and Flood Control District. Peak Runoff Prediction by the Rational Method. Computer software. Software. Vers. 2.00. http://udfcd.arg/software>. Urban Drainage and FloodControl District. "Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual Volume 1." USDCM.* Volume Al Management, Hydrology and Hydraulics. UDFCD, Mar. 2017. Web. 29 Nov. 2018. http://udfcd. org/volume-one>. Urban Drainage and Flood Control District. "Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual Volumes 2." USDC1I.• Volume 2 Structures, Storage and Recreation. UDFCD, Sep. 2017. Web. 29 Nov. 2018. http ://udfc d. org/volume-two> . 4/9/2019 Preliminary Drainage Report Page 12 of 12 AGPROfessionals, 3050 67`}` Avenue, Greeley CO 80634 * 970-535-9318 * www.agpros.com Ruiz Trucking, LLC Weld County. "Property Portal - Map Search." Property Portal - Map Search. Weld County, 19 Dec. 2017. Web. 7 March 2019. <https://propertyreport.co.weld.co.usilaccount=R6780080>. Weld County. "Weld County Engineering and Construction Criteria Guidelines." Weld County Engineering, July 2017. Web. 4 April 2019. ww.weldgov.comits erFiles/ S erversiS erver_6/File/ epartments/Public%20 orks/En gineering/ CEC %20-% 08--17.pdf.> 4/9x'`2019 Preliminary Drainage Report Page 13 of 12 AGPRofessionals, 3050 67`}` Avenue, Greeley CO 80634 * 970-535-9318 * www.agpros.com Ruiz Trucking, LLC Appendices A. Hydrologic Computations a. Vicinity Map b. USDA-NRC S Soil Report c. USGS Topographic Map d. FEMA FIRMette Map e. NOAA Atlas 14 Rainfall Maps f. Percentage of Imperviousness g. UDFCD Historical Runoff Calculations and Time of Concentration Calculations h. UD Rational RunoffCalculations B. Hydraulic Computations a. 5 -Year Historic Release Rate b. UDFCD Detention Volume c. UDFCD Stage Storage d. UDFCD WQCV e. UDFCD Restrictor Plate f. UDFCD Outlet Structure g. UDFCD Outlet Culvert h. UDFCD Spillway i. NRCS Swale Calculations j. NRCS Rock Chute Calculations k. UDFCD Culvert & Rip Rap Calculations C. 24 x 36 Maps a. General Drainage Plan b. Drainage and Erosion Control Plan c. Drainage and Erosion C ontro l Details Ruiz Trucking, LLC APPENDIX A Hydrologic Computations MIT WELD COUNTY Vicinity JNLIIN.E MAPPING ap 0 1,117,12 2(234,2 Feet 2(234.2 WG S_198 Web_Mercato r Auxi I iary_Sphere © We l d County Colorado This mao is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping s'te and is for re'e rerce only. Data layers that cope ar or this map may or may no: be F,ccurate, c drrent, or otherwise rehab a THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION ran Collins Legend Parcels Highway Signs f•- litZt SIMS MIMMI 1610, 6 25 34 37 52 60 66 71 76 79 85 119 257 263 341 392 Address Label Road Name Notes USDA United States Department of Agriculture MRCS Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local participants Custom Soil Resource Report for Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part Ruiz Trucking LLC March 7,2019 Preface Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas. They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers. Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand, protect, or enhance the environment. Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions. The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations. Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nres.usda.gav/wps/ portal/nres/main/soils/health/} and certain conservation and engineering applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center (https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=arcs) or your N RCS State Soil Scientist (h ttp ://www. n res . u sd a . g ov/wps/portal/n res/d etai I /so i I s/co nta ctu s/? cid =n res 142 p2_0539 51). Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to basements or underground installations. The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey. Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available through the N RCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require 2 alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. 3 Contents Preface 2 How Soil Surveys Are Made 5 Soil Map 8 Soil Map 9 Legend 10 Map Unit Legend 11 Map Unit Descriptions 11 Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part 13 34 —Kim loam, 5 to 9 percent slopes 13 47 Olney fine sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes 14 References 16 4 How Soil Surveys Are Made Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length, and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other biological activity. Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA. The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a specific location on the landscape. Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented by an understanding of the soil -vegetation -landscape relationship, are sufficient to verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries. Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units). Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil 5 Custom Soil Resource Report scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and research. The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas. Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map. The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape, and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the soil -landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at specific locations. Once the soil -landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded. These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color, depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil typically vary from one point to another across the landscape. Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other properties. While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field -observed characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management. Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same kinds of soil. Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example, soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date. After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and 6 Custom Soil Resource Report identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings, fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately. Soil Map The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit. 8 40° 4' 48" 40° 4' 44" N 104° 50' 48" W 513060 513070 513080 513090 513100 513110 513120 513130 513140 513150 513160 513170 513180 513190 513200 513210 513220 b LI 513060 513070 513080 513090 513100 513110 Map Scale: 1:790 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet N 0 10 20 40 513120 Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map 513130 Meters 60 Foot 513140 0 35 70 140 210 Map projection: Web Mercator Comer coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UM Zone 13N WGS84 9 513150 513160 513170 513180 513190 513200 513210 513220 104° 50' 41" W 104° 50' 41" VQ 40° 4'48"N 40° 4' 44" N Resource Report Custom Soi z 0 O z a a z W C, W J 0. 4 were mapped at nterest (A0l) C N 4 -o 1) U ° CC5ID 0 L o (15 CC a CS3 E _c a °-_c a � C 43) co 41) 0 E [f) 0 43 4) - . i W 00 a) E cm .E 3 a co % 0 45 c CO w ' ° en a; Very Stony Spot 0 i} S KC 0 Map Unit Polygons a �. � U)y O Map Unit Lines Map Unit Points C/) O) CA a Line Features a C4 I �F Point Features A3 a 0 Water Features CO 0 C 0) C co co (V co fa co (13 CD t 22 73 t a) ' !4 —to E aJ "o 4_ ' f = o r a7 .Ca 2 Qa = c E a) t ono CO a a oS con a 2 ,a) _61) 2 C/3 O Z 6 R, . 00 u 3 COa (/) ID 613 ol- -0 co Ed 0 E W CD Chi 2° 2 Go C? r cO L �` aco n 0 v w 0 L 0 a7 U vi 2 {L }' a ti a) u3C cCCI t CD co O 0 V o c CJ — .a a C a) _C) CD Ca 2 r O 2 0 co as Z D E a) a co Ca O a) „ {� aJ 2 2 CY7 a) CO S 2 0 _ -�c 6 "g" () :())' a) z ct. a5 r ere '''' C? Cu E a r& lAs co 3 '` a) L' 3 t� a7 2 C O O q) a) v p m a c a_ 0 CI) V) U t) i.CI) 8 C L L_ �- CU A CO CD E Q aJ as al 'i 8 C_ .� N 3 to r — a — O o a> 0 II K :5-5 cn cucc.3 Transportation tu 172 cc US Routes C .F tri i 8 a . t - co a.. A. a 0 o Z3 — — — LL co a0 U C U O J J a 0 0 a C Marsh or swamp Mine or Quarry aneous Water I- O) to cne 0E) C_ Rock Outcrop a V 7 C LLI a Sep 20, 2015 —Oct images were photographed: 0 c' N C) 0 c v o c)a)cf5 E 01) °0'a) L Cco fl a >I 1• t5 En3 to In 0 so Q 6 c-_ N O la O -a o as as n 1 - 07 0 .ao E E H o._ 15 Cl} >s a) upfl % c3 >. 22 0 C Cf3 _c c5 C ▪ 1:3d? CD .45 t5 C 7 a C/) Co of) ▪ -CT) {{) C!) II Custom Soil Resource Report Map Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of Aol 34 Kim loam, 5 to 9 percent slopes 1.0 31.6% 47 Olney fine sandy percent slopes loam, 1 to 3 2.2 68.4% Totals for Area of Interest 3.2 100.0% Map Unit Descriptions The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit. A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class. Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made u p of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils. Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called n oncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and miscellaneous areas on the landscape. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the u sefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however, 11 Custom Soil Resource Report onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas. An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions. Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil properties and qualities. Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement. Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness, salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series. Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas. These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups. A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar in all areas. Alpha -Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example. An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar. Alpha -Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example. 12 Custom Soil Resource Report Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part 34 Kim loam, 5 to 9 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 362d Elevation: 4,900 to 5,250 feet Mean annual precipitation: 13 to 17 inches Mean annual air temperature: 46 to 52 degrees F Frost -free period: 125 to 150 days Farmland classification: Farmland of local importance Map Unit Composition Kim and similar soils: 90 percent Minor components: 10 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Kim Setting Landform: Plains, alluvial fans Down -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Parent material: Mixed eolian deposits derived from sedimentary rock Typical profile H1 - 0 to 10 inches: loam H2 - 10 to 35 inches: loam H - 35 to 60 inches: fine sandy loam Properties and qualities Slope: 5 to 9 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Runoff class: Low Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water 'Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 5.95 inlhr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of podding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 15 percent Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 8.8 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 4e Land capability classification 'nonirrigated): 6e Hydrologic Soil Group: A Ecological site: Loamy Slopes (8067 BY008 C O ) Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Otero Percent of map unit: 6 percent Hydric soil rating: No Custom Soil Resource Report Valent Percent of map unit: 4 percent Hydric soil rating: No 47— Olney fine sandy loam, 'I to 3 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 362v Elevation: 4,600 to 5,200 feet Mean annual precipitation: 11 to 15 inches Mean annual air temperature: 46 to 54 degrees F Frost -free period: 125 to 175 days Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated and the product of I (soil erodibility) x C (climate factor) does not exceed 60 Map Unit Composition Olney and similar soils: 85 percent Minor components: 15 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transacts of the mapunit. Description of Olney Setting Landform: Plains Down -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Parent material: Mixed deposit out ash Typical profile H1 - 0 to 10 inches: fine sandy loam H2 - 10 to 20 inches: sandy clay loam H3 - 20 to 25 inches: sandy clay loam H4 - 25 to 60 inches: fine sandy loam Properties and qualities Slope: 1 to 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 8O inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Runoff class: Low Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water ('Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 2.00 inlhr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 15 percent salinity maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhoslcm) Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 7.0 inches) Custom Soil Resource Report Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 3e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4c Hydrologic Soil Group: B Ecological site: Sandy Plains (R067BY024CO) Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Zigweid Percent of map unit: 10 percent Hydric soil rating: No Vona Percent of map unit: 5 percent Hydric soil rating: No References American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling and testing. 24th edition. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00. Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deep -water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service FWS/OBS-79/31. Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States. Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States. Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric soils in the United States. National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries. Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/ n res/d etai I/natio na I/so i l s/?cid =nres 142 p2_0542 62 Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http:// www.nres.usda.gav/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres 142p2_053577 Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http:// www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres 142p2_053580 Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands Section. United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical Report Y-87-1. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National forestry manual. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/ home/?cid=nres 142p2_053374 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/ d etai I /n atio n al /I a nd use/rang ep astu re/?cid = ste l prd b 10430 84 16 Custom Soil Resource Report United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National soil survey handbook, title 430 -VI. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/ n res/d etai I/soils/scientists/?cid =nres 14.2 p2_054242 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 2 96 . http: //www. n res . u sd a. gov/wps/porta I/nres/deta i I/nation al/soils/? cid =nres 142 p2_Or53624 United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http:// www.nrcs.usda.gov/InternetiFSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2 052290.pdf 17 r-76 USGS t:1:191u:e for y c s ujIllp 71n7'I!I 163°5< 20- 46=67'30" 444., Atli 5' two 4435 4638 ate 8135 a34 4533 41O PEET 4120 4428 46-06' U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR US GEOLOGICAL SURVEY }12 „a 5U "5 The Na{.nlrsl l•l•!p USTopo "b 4.7'.6' +• 3 I :i 31111 IIIIIlE6 El FORT LUPTON QUADRANGLE COLORADO 7.5 -MINUTE SERIES 1220 '21 . '' •\ I 1 ! _ _ r Y�RC4S ,!. I1I ki. — J^ ) II _5 Ai 1 Y ' i I N"•,�fii•'M1! f! 4 - JThirj Tf -------en\.) t 1 Fi ry •1 7.2„: , �� ;a i e, J, .ly,. , 4 646:• 1 11 1 ti Co u 1. : , r y '•,. CO.!!11.!i IL, L,}yry tj�5 .!' y J -. I.a .H.-i b::icti:r!- ,,.t•, •�,,� ICyK' O I� _ '• c°` Ca-r7s'_ s. Y lc -{_ K' W�•=ll �� yj J'1'f�1 I ` Si`5,,�'` i•4'� 1 iC<L? 1.J �^.�IJ ,,Jhl _.i1 �R + :all`sw r—-� 1 �4 ;lux". \4t — '1�0 y �"{ `,r .R f�! L `I l- K�y^`J�r L art I • I C J —S 1 I -.- J 4ti l°I'.Z''1R1-77 f t �j 1:t � . L +S .- i -_ .. CC.R0..15 - I i- `41 \j i • i ^ 11 `~� ca 7{4 '� ;� �� � a�..•1 11:,� - `� �I' S vici 1— • r!.s1s. I.4. n� ff {y\I 4 AS J _ `�'�r 1 -�7 l 'Y I�' 'fi .• I,I a{ �.* ,fq �r�1 es„• -' III'a 4L Ti ,''.jf Y'l l� I + R'1 'Ja 1 1 Li 90:•41 �{ rN.-" .- b € 4'• �5. --! ! ; r h. } U t y�I k v , ` T �`tiLw�, // 1 •'� 4 1 Giiiiii �, ti $ I' ` '' ? r eel I �J ^� 5', ' r:i �tV. LL �. _ _ -.'-i �P I L^� Aims iJ _, ;'�'`. >� I ILt �LC �`_ Ns- r' t..immun• I— .. .. y� s — I 4.I ( t . f Y �} a L 4 so r�.% - - - fry • - MIL=<+�L kD - ( I j 1: -�7 1 t lt} r �. z ; kh -TiT2J J , — ; �} 1 ;_! �' :- •__. — L'` sI , S. , ,. .,. .'yet. Q 1 1/4"--�� - v.j/�_ .•fit , I. �k } l • • S ... ��, 4• \\I`,\/i/ I • �L Pr it —� �sr�'_ �, • �: aci' I •'r�� . ii:: `� � I\ -`—_ l\d• rf I I ? .,,.. ^ i iri Orr i' �, i - e, M ( 1 ��y i '? '� I S Hill. A r `� +4 6 :J �1 -:.:].f de i NS .ii it tg i 4( .94. fj il ..,...j.4)) le' +•• i..: .... 1 -. . C I A ( f ...1" -. —.."---..\_."..... r 11 ree \ 1.\\,_ > C---- ).4. \ If: CM. k : Z,+! ....C ..m70-.. ^~ ____,\ l 40 „''i S \ all a' r• I .1 i 5:I+.:.r� s L ti �-�, I r }.. •� tit ■ 4 N1µ-ttt r } 1 :15', her 1 • re- eL:. �l ( J 2'55' ThtI _ tl y ff r ar (- } I - J �\ I_ Id") /}J f r '4 i)i 4 �t i f + - f.� {r AIM- L ' ... ♦1,L'Y_.f A' 4 JJ ■ ti. 1a.44LLLLL_ i.J I •I ;•r'� x'^41' I! •� .,r.:- Y •.1 .s.,.. M1 _ ) i I iN'Lli II 1� (r 0 .rr"J wars/ tit r!JLI'_ 1 ✓// -gm J. mem. ea. ireywyreb \ll dr fisi, t` dotThc5, {` rS .1� ^ 1ij .+�•-. ti• 1 ��{yy •_ it .v,-r��", lil Zi 1 -� r; y�4 ' Iy. ' RD 0444. 1 � -'��•-�r.�-� �'1tf I� C. ,,,:y I ja, _Jf .�.---ti fr i • 1.1)f l as } .' .. �i + 1•, \�� \ - /j / .+' , dd �I JJ Cti. y \LJl � s -kb ! II —_% L, 1 ,Y � •°�� I J 4JI I '• .„1::1(12• •6•.. , CQtI.4 ti'L: LZ .•: 1'.':I llj..•t• : ,� `� —`— —F �l�i t ,.Q -��f�j�,�la�'�Illl -. IIIII�.lr�1i. ��'1♦ )`1♦ �� ""-_� < --: - !1° —�S'— . 11\— l[(yL S,r ` 0 t4 '-'"�. . I{I�Tf I,'` i.f rd r'� ` 'L, f,.`/ (.3C rel -Le .4.---_---P-„, ( CIIII. i Cs C ~S rif — O v st.,• (or i' �� r f C.�'`� ., rte}• . I ) Arr 4. ! f1f \\C't 4tz 1 if: ii,.. ri crit i e• iji feji y r ---ti made J �r �- / r r COI la s�"`-'- _ j :1 H7 lei }�J 47. • 1 F �s( S4 1 4 r e; I r 7 / V-1 .5rl- rl (� r fVJ +` 5S ry. 5%+� 1JJ J�'' I k y ,r> rt' Sriir+ e. r—fJ lJ ; ti^ .' rl -� r 1 Sstr' ` g 'e ', {{,1 t,'•�L'•• �a'rr.n CO Ioc.se IA,I 4i$ d an i�'ee1 ';? . j cr�P - � t. Y .. '� - y /— r 1 I 1 1 '�1 ' _ + L I fay I. r. ' , t i 1 t ti r` ` Y _ cr _ " �'`•:.�v r t"1 .`" t ti. ' .'`� t4 F.1 lfl t7 .. Ve, 2 I :t 1911 -III ni-LE 104= 52 30' Produced by the United States GeokigicaL Survey Nnrth Smarican Datum nt 1483 On CLIP ,'+r. rid G::•d91C SesrJrn nt 1?84 IWGS8b. Pr5;•dttlnn and I lr7J m3:1r till: Lin tarsal nsc rs. a•acamr, -nn^ 131 - la JdJ-rant tltks: L5lrxann Cnnrdlnata SestIhl51 t'i83 t north x5ns Ills imp Is nt a latal rtn:urn:nt. L'nundarlasmay ha 2anarrt l-.ld tat this map s^.alp. Plllams ...thin 41: errm. nt ras. rwUnns ma,• not ha shs.,n. obtain parmllslfn hr.hra eatarina gnat a lands. Imo;aq•..... _...._ IAJP .tily 3013 R rads............... .. Li S teiuus Stt4put 201$ . 2016 N a m as .............. ....... .. ......... ......, ..0i 5. 2018 Hydrn rapt's'. ...................Rational IA•drnRrapha Datsat. 3013 L nrtnurs...._....._....._.......... Wtlnnal l7acatlnn Cataset. 3715 C rundarls............ unItIpla sane. „ sag mnt4A ars HI:: 1972 DIG PUN t Land SOWN' Lw•staIl,,,,•r•,... .,,...•.,,...•...........L''Lv. 3U11 W.: hands.........FW1 National Yetttnds broil tlry 1977 3714 13 ?Pt I. k —17.111 C5 I UIN CIIU AMU 1111 .NRl'ML IIC MC PIM PLCLIMLIIL'M L1 CCM Mk L't LMttl U.S. Holland Cud tt 131 EU' 1 5 a 16 SCALE1:24 000 p RILCUETEPS 7 2- 1 a 0 METE. - 0 2600 1 M8 0'30' AiILE5 1:;IJ J 1:11J :UN 3CU11 4470 UJ3 GJJJ ;J'J;I tJJU ?JJJ 1;;IJ;I FEET EOIITUUR INTERVAL 1,0 FEET WORTH AVERICSH VERTICAL 6ATIW OF 1480 This map .Las gradual:Ito Grnfnrm iIth tha Rational Ganspall Prnwam U3 Twin Product ltandard. _1711. A matadata II assrclatad NIlb this prrdurt Is daft .'aslnn J. 6.14 ■ ::a:;P•LRD 1 2 3 4 - 6 ; L" • u C:'Ir. :Uv 111::.'LLR as i Gnwanda PlattarIlle 3 vllhn Rasar+5lr 4 Ft.:darirk G Hlms5n 4 Eastlake 7 Minton B mil: MO Lit;: 104.51 cw'31T 510 1'200000 FEET 5' 4436 4435 1124 4533 z3• 4'331 Ara 412E.„1,t4 1•la,n€ I 'KC 45' "EGAD CLAXIFlCP.T1C'H Espnss.ray Loot<tlmgtm 'CcnndaryHny IDOL 0000 Pamp 41171 Intastat4 Rnut4 FORT LUPTON, CO 2016 OSLOW 000t?: F. -JI ? �m 'F r 0'7 :J I. yE _5 LL C; " Jim Ui cc a, r•I z NOTES TO USERS Flint Mall a ova war r. a1--rae■I ry see Mara t sC Iraarin Pswie- 9 3va si ',r-r■.caai 101 re' nano el jttrt. Ik_rts el•train pentElry rtIfTirr2III item,■. Kindi nagshe Te comelier new n 9' net to -=ne at< Ire 3GLL�fa d1'rStbilail a3ta■ak taiittt.Leialfdo'rt>:95a <Saar• MI, MUM M}'P4latilr WHO 'Mfl3!M4 Pi 44 �lQltpigr+s ,»�---11 tra6•:' itiaittiettb rare bats donee* Art at incat21001 Y tar at the Firrlr1 "Min ,oaePinirs s Oafs man StiT.rltnF_9a Jason a EasasirlUriaamenacing rats 114* Nn t Imann Mick Atrnd its 1sicwa flys irFipll IAin meal be man ow tiffs One mei, Me PAM niesan .car. r appolgom imam iv Fra ors ■Isioane st, tea m pa*lttS Icy !(!manse at" Sol r hat ,a * Lan 44. is r1, a first. ilig #?51I 1st al wn ri r-aalag; t AA -ranch k ram sae's a I]ra p ter eal at liar P 5Ann named is mean t i raj ¶'*nasal anti r ■ FVey 4fr '*asst 0 iirefikettear afa ris-M ee .. i dui s 1 :e#irir Ew F14.01 tFalirn 41 Pit S +lfN 'fags IalPIth*F i+ :4 _ -*ice 4 ICS Ear : o aoPi et. Lean a F. not to t. i+ 91! IPhn .RPSSS 4m .paii.aiioi in as 'Trani fat-ta■rara Edtafrin 7 biros ra I •€. Pr p t r714.tta1.3i' v�l l/!' -al *MVO' ire -Ills i.ylsart5`labra E -a 4 mot its &'talkri €0 Senn a tats''*' laiae mamas r S at etas �I- •• i =, i'•�}in sr ekaiarticat.iT ha. an iCr.`a Ilpi Ins rA4 11+ -it • -s 5• riFIN ♦*.,aria' la -"lame Iii-nonalae eant Canaan 'r :FYI ail meet mrarininad ar • ='�9f�i�,�t�� IyC OCC• The r4{yA•5yPyjl�a�ly.�tl�iaA�a��u 'co It n[ouiy��*S4 cosiness s111 I'.. ..tAsY'f ols el (he led F t !"Qv:v rt+ Poway 1 ▪ .r r _: a.• nzriabeelikik NSW 1011•pallerlttl uti t -a final lailea firup. iaaye 1■'nr tar new a' yvnal Toed martsa anon triry vs prneato ne land cgntra! 9lrasbar4% Refer t4 Ser46i.n 2-4 "need °,tined aar tNe$9iTe9" 4 I.he 1Tti{d lrr9teaP + Sm_tif As tut utjtrrsicn a iced moans tairuot_tos int dais iu"aiteliun Thr pir4nc mi hard in Ito 'snout nioan i firs *slap Nag ktnaner * lann'cr,i. .4&' IO; ,'�Tit1 I;^tk 11 Tr* medicinal cam EOM NhD ax 4R9 19114 salts! Dash a ir SaLai ryiatai. win:tow to OM slant uaitl at Ifni ct'na again ul rights tot asTme d n tlir4 nee .malt In NU PuetecS istereii_CS in reapfoaatin_5 auras .4r.•Jacafan tauntiaHee These teeere tesamwet Mtn h.i was lace :i to F IN1.1 ixb.44 601 )1 P d aillp ant ferftraltce9 I0 the P4fth n, ry1 ft:3rl 44A . it Dalam to d_ta Trate n: OS et►tai74rt! OS be cctrest K• ahL:lat ahi WOW"; detimintai lafaaagia n 0" "In4 VMS" Oita- Fe. nlenrs'kora "Wan rig 4-3461131144 _trnav:n Ile f`4Skrpat Gt d tic Verticll Coturn >r I9e rd ttr_ tt:r+h f+rnlerbnrl • O.ts_. .a iarl. 'J -•J:Ai .si fie ;issue; Cl aim et. _.t.n naa a i •I "Menill 741 l ntri Q a. it 'fir l+¢cn! calliaPIC ', .'rat all !a 1r nret'9 Auer, "-Ain Irdrii'ir 'rat .5' wens +rer4 NAG.1.'� 1 .ra4DxlL ¶v ill` .1.4hat.3 Sr 1310 E ! Wedt1fglwcc Satrif ?On. RVil+iiifl•99C91u- Y111117a3ZaY Siineegairret,ufllnit1Ga dt:Kw:of waittl t zcvi utoiitaaa-lo earwig artai cram Pr'•'P4! map gy.0 arose se earn en ?In gin •0 ea Niger a r:Rest itt &r -9r Ili sir1 t T!7- UC ss a tn.' laadlr'i a:9g1 arm in- SM l$i4 ingua"'rtat tvwi {1a WA FIRM .seal rad !'Gill it• -.r.^ l fir.. tip •mow....-. -m a.,•. arm...: -a -.,.-t. -.I.r p•. - - ..,. .4r •-•� ..:-... y.era+P-eawr.•+en fwlr• a1=..�aar,r-'.s .4.••• I ier§M he haematite rtq■rart m Tine se aamealt.Init hpa..als aaeaaa(irtj ivoane iy.•:Iirir eirvAiti?s!MI ieaYaiFi kvalNab 4++rasEel9WI4tt'i•ns4aat II r. Inunl b likesuilnpe •- tam* -ilia. .-we nmeek ui(Iri iatri:ap Il ha'' Ifair %Sin* no ass aygar to lfla'!e llp 4l .J* Tura Ulte.?aai as *111241 .1 stet aiteera.aia mina ['tame eardiseseatuau n r mi s enamor an at.s apaR suit F 0131. W I gap i•,ta crap. Iris rnrainat fl tamen Ilse *tile. i(sraaanartl lie, Ina wen -.n Fah' 111145 tar NMI tLusM w •.:vdavrtrr k• nitata tees Simon near* 14-4*jiJ--4 'ant as a 'sit It. -amt "-men eras i'naae et Ails 'fast ,,at zial® Siair in fro t lama 4 ktes c 1 LOp R4efif .es.at :kW** Jlu p+_•a!#t 4+ IlrliaaallC U.9MJ11 ten IeIW ocikta rf*tt4 Ifnaval Oral S. wet rY. * irtadrh •3i't'rtas @t'eLID 'Oftap`sO 1!tl ITl4 gesai4 ti / e Ili t• INC 6-a 41W4 Sso R. Ws§ iliiai 4h 43 6 IP4ocmie • • -'_ _•,• 4 -r -.`.era an��••-.a-- ho �' �.' �r.-a a •• ..•••••••••••-•4n-a aro.-. CI MIT :µJr* lint nap $ fl pi tee= ern WM'S Idadin Irrc' nonmetals n ig"la0li piggy►it £1 *, o..Tdr�gp•ltrbir ia•I,•a,- eslt -: —assa'Ne .rtes nap lades tr a met ;s!. mks Si Its :zaftig'' Yco itt i fair ke it l a r I sari; van irsmanetle maxi manure eecesswe 3nG Y. ue/iapa 131 Carat.ri le; IBatt.* Raw Itswasce algrr Stlaa fro sad' aa'rat'irt?e Y- rants* a 7stili -4 1la sire's ran sell li s,us Aft I as remiss .il .rt,�te.tiiant or, mental aralInEa aaomelad lire +a FIRM Emil Ile Map Went Crew IWig slogan: ar -1t•r.r'rltIrnaQ"l%i ai,ai■tata at s.i. mat •ti'.cia p r:rale Ititri4 1. IWit 0! wilt ;rt}r ea : t 'neiutF6f. -1alr awe' e r'o• maim curium d fie ne ice • 4 "eini iicdd* car as Liana s stepwwalg acme rrrvlly pp um:shrews urpews I 'east (law . amellimis Ihaul tl•6 snap., ran e? ahem angina it ma mauls ' rrn u.. l.•6.•.••ia. i&harjt jr4dlii1 a I 41 *Aka IP ICT: '3Jfi•Miri Ribs I+e °Ya xlc.aliml Iy7y;.'WOW tahl;2i4:1+ilrr• a ds. 1M' T< n(1' Ph G1' ]I7 ti tat f 10035. P4f1E! -1 19• 3171[. at .n !ILL �i4i k 171t!.' : rlii'Ril ( d i rL'tl • uSv'I'a,r, 17mis r THIS AREA SHOWN ATA. SCALE OF 1 '" _ 500' fl L I L■ AF L i I I.L ■ BE rl 08123C2102 roposed Site THS AREA SHOWN AT A SCALE O h 1'" ON MAP NUMBER O i1 3C2ir04 Ica :e;- .'I.r JQIk 1PAsi Ei 3130000 Fl 3insaenFT Molt' War AREA t HQ'fM 4M T't~4 PAWL IS I.moll D WHIN FIANCE V WEST. :115bi}6ri FT EL I, - ,:, IJ II ;lD: I I '.VII130'6t - I F.7M1 C4 1' tri%Mtl FT 4J- -33 at" WC 4W ii' An ' Y R .t i "- LEGEND -Eva I K'r'L rim trf : 4.4, OS .it -='?.-t. $I trI.K 2 1,0 a 11WAtribFi:ia ry s L'4 clsubu.. I?,4yf..1 RACE• .R- I•� r -� =rs Est I ife •s- it -c wars a r.e as lost -liw 3-C am. I a I r.;11,•••11 a vat assay r rvaa1 r r.. ;y.& yw tea spas aae 11 i.at me eal. ,. _ .I r reaW.i Q- rik I t a rra ) t M& WI c:z::, '%. 4eeiZanr.:.{.ngr "CS", it''aai A i} "Si 44 an. q• t 3 'rT►3547,4.• t e 2u I nit 441`4..i_ r_- e- aJ Ft _- roe' ,.e is MINE a Le in l'a 3aaan 204 aY fart* a Cr. rc.ora ae-'c- r�aL ram-ra a : s I roc eamat aft agsanrar Ist' Cat •b'. n :seise pas —:11a .! 'pal if I L . - -as* Pa IS ri *nw'3r Neale ✓ ata. YCt. 'i ors=i'•s►r >is li.dat a.s —'w -at' -art4 we• s s7=a • VW I.IS 177,6 7D•O10 I r_s ra sw w—. sin• e ta Oi'.1 e -.r a •4K•ia. Tao-•a►.-se77■r.'i Vex -+e ix, t ran MI sr Ness 1Na'caea ass T^G V•Yat 31 traaet• smuts ire. rat i at P vela �'rl 4141 ntY aer^- 4tnr as algal a aC Si trans van can to Iri' veal Yat esokasst ette i a os in re r!•mr"ea.* leer 1 r i et- hro Pltyai.• se#a' Iti rle12?TTIts.S •.![.aaf+31 Ces^+s.^q rawwa-,tre inr bear t —moo heatab• traernorti it$ --'it erne -taruinir faun RI 33* ii Iin iv.. —on =on 3 a aloes au- Set. . s -O-• 'O .F.- a mac !taw a.•, •.:•4..i1» a tae rM 1i� ati�.sa saw;a aart:cat s :irx Net; re.. .,i. April it 1riit rizOtiMtk9 AVM N n" !a+91 Nat! 144.1, SWW $la 4 to st trMltt NO +..r b'tQi Ieasct• at1.@.�.M.ta.1haCo•"�t'?Weti1410164th lWaal F'!3ti Mel IiIS It-44We.tr ib i l4te l'ik+•fa01 f'4' i yk44 Oyl istddeE S %WY, dinirasas m s us al n!O 7ia traincnee amiss. 9104 i alai I krc MAIM nI IflMPTIAalar. W U. ex:A IJ+t.:Rassz1t (L'W. I) nttr �1 itErtAI'ST 1110 -1T -CE G• hRFA=•. (QFi1s; UNIT i-.: a-' Lust 0.._X_ 0.44001:44ase se flaw. in arm. •r 1 •tca. , tuts ieca Vacant *Say :re t9r.:3•ii laaaa-9sa'r• at--a--attatmair12 asp* - tsar t.aaaI. ■i :>~ yap *Ss Wall Sa 584 -art ras Sat CV :a,■ zsal�a� Frt a ten 4'n! a9� as Sal laaa osi n ria :rre as Pt I e- bair zk! ! �•t-r -at! -j'tz r —u1..34• r. -..• v. a' re. c•cire acts- -nr :a n race 1,a, AIMS'_ Wert* Ire' ;area R®:- earl., lr Ier ael, tTSi�T 190 .syra ''bit 4thl Ninth L 31144 err CrnJ•'k-- 0M bs tom, .war ;.r - a arc mina, 1467*! warm. 'S+s !'•M saw,: a re U saes to bras etas*. dal- 1Sal ;snail Sr Ms r't t -c an a 44*la••W.d av-064 a.. 3Tb_'rt+r[ ak a ;at asi2l411tILi alt at!L '!6 ss;l asst ilia tar ac mot tt rtcirit t labia IN 9e '1*UNI ill rays!witl rm carats rim none y:eall2n It .afl&a cc's str a. ai Ca'ruts at Saw sin mile lair "asst Well re Tea •a1 Sr Iran IcsaQ.dw 'm ireentr s saint girS414 t' !ST, - -t 4..a .im-ar l 'SOW~ Plitt le r>arya . as n aa■Psib tiii*tilma 5a s t .l 9.45 ?F-iial in MAP '.9td.E.1- - tu:tl ■ 14101' JJI ago I sties nrl ell a IfL1dEL 2!14'?E FIRM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP WELI) OKI Nit COLOR .A.I.N) AND INC .111H.fOl 4ILli AREAS - PANEL i'ip5 OF .2i tW.E YAP IFtNEXFen FIRM PANEL L eacZuTI 1Qf41rP'b. *_.pet■ lynT 16_19 •ILLstieMt. aara a' w errs:." r.trr n Nome 1411ier Ta14 Nuimmr 4117ii'ti DtiCw 'dues@ Coe uial ens nautili sa Dhaka. Ms community Itr!IlbuI cow" NM* ccvcs, tiI- NJlei co I-'JVisncc aroi:atlam rat the ii4ea 1351111 a9r f MIA' NUMBER 49:5'.t tti t3RF EFFECTIVE DATE JANUARY 20. 2D 16 Federal® trier rnci bian(lpaatrue.yra(t7 3/7/2019 Precipitation Frequency Data Server NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 8, Version 2 Location name: Fort Lupton, Colorado, USA* Latitude: 40.0795°, Longitude: -104.8459° Elevation: 4950.85 ft** source: ESRI Maps n source: USGS POINT PRECIPITATION FREQUENCY ESTIMATES l Fai a✓ ctr'Fry rt C'-`. Sanja Perica, Deborah Martin, Sandra Pavlovic, Ishani Roy, Michael St. Laurent, Carl Trypaluk, Dale Unruh, Michael Yekta, Gecffery Bonnin NOAA, National Weather Service, Silver Spring, Maryland PF tabular I PF graphical I Maps & aerials PF tabular PD -based point precipitation frequency estimates with 90% confidence intervals (in inches)1 Duration 5 -min 10 -min 15 -mini 30 -min 60 -min 2 -hr • 3 -hr 6 -hr 12 -hr 24 -hr 2 -day 3 -day 4 -day 7 -day 10 -day 20 -day 30 -day 45 -day 60 -day Average recurrence interval (years) 1 0.230 (0.177-0.298) 0.337 (0.259-0.437) 0.411 (0.316-0.533) 0.559 (0.431-0.726) 0.683 (0.526-0.886) 0.806 (0.628-1.03) 0.872 (0.684-1.11) 1.03 (0.819-1.30) 1.27 (1.02-1.58) 1.51 (1.23-1.86) 1.72 (1.41-2.09) 1.88 (1.55-2.26) 2.01 (1.66-2.40) 2.30 (1.92-2.73) 2.55 (2.14-3.01) 3.26 (2.77-3.80) 3.83 (3.28-4.42) 4.60 (3.88-5.16) 5.06 (4.38-5.76) 2 0.280 (0.216-0.364) 0.410 (0.316-0.533) 0.500 (0.385-0.650) 0.678 (0.522-0.881) 0.827 (0.637-1.07) 0.975 (0.769-1.25) 1.05 (0.824-1.34) 1.23 (0.974-1.55) 1.49 (1.19-1.85) 1.79 (1.45-2.21) 2.09 (1.71-2.54) 2.26 (1.86-2.72) 2.38 (1.97-2.86) 2.69 (2.25-3.20) 2.96 (2.49-3.49) 3.73 (3.17-4.35) 4.36 (3.73-5.05) 5.15 (4.43-5.91) 5.81 (5.02-6.63) 5 0.377 (0.289-0.490) 0.551 (0.423-0.718) 0.672 (0.516-0.876) 0.908 (0.697-1.18) 1.11 (0.850-1.44) 1.31 (1.01-1.68) 1.41 (1.10-1.80) 1.62 (1.28-2.04) 1.91 (1.62-2.38) 2.30 (1.85-2.83) 2.72 (2.22-3.31) 2.90 (2.38-3.50) 3.02 (2.49-3.63) 3.35 (2.78-3.98) 3.65 (3.05-4.31) 4.51 (3.81-5.26) 5.24 (4.46-6.07) 6.18 (5.31-7.11) 7.00 (6.04-8.01) 10 0.470 (0.359-0.615) 0.689 (0.526-0.901) 0.840 (0.641-1.10) 1.13 (0.864-1 A8) 1.38 (1.06-1.81) 1.64 (1.26-2.11) 1.76 (1.37-2.26) 2.00 (1.57-2.54) 2.32 (1.84-2.90) 2.76 (2.21-3.41) 3.26 (2.64-3.99) 3.45 (2.81-4.18) 3.57 (2.92-4.31) 3.91 (3.23-4.67) 4.22 (3.52-5.02) 5.15 (4.34-6.03) 5.95 (5.05-6.93) 7.02 (5.99-8.10) 7.95 (6.83-9.14) 25 0.620 (0.468-0.865) 0.907 (0.685-1.27) 1.11 (0.835-1.55) 1.49 (1.13-2.08) 1.83 (1.38-2.56) 2.16 (1.65-2.99) 2.32 (1.79-3.19) 2.61 (2.03-3.54) 2.96 (2.32-3.94) 3.45 (2.71-4.48) 4.03 (3.17-5.10) 4.22 (3.35-5.31) 4.35 (3.46-5.43) 4.70 (3.78-5.81) 5.04 (4.07-6.17) 6.04 (4.93-7.27) 6.94 (5.69-8.26) 8.15 (6.72-9.61) 9.24 (7.64-10.8) 50 0.751 (0.550-1.05) 1.10 (0.805-1.54) 1.34 (0.982-1.88) 1.81 (1.33-2.54) 2.22 (1.63-3.12) 2.63 (1.95-3.66) 2.83 (2.11-3.90) 3.16 (2.38-4.29) 3.53 (2.69-4.72) 4.04 (3.09-5.29) 4.64 (3.57-5.94) 4.84 (3.75-6.15) 4.97 (3.87-6.28) 5.34 (4.19-6.67) 5.69 (4.49-7.05) 6.73 (5.37-8.20) 7.68 (6.17-9.27) 8.99 (7.26-10.7) 10.2 (8.26-12.1) 100 0.896 (0.634-1.29) 1.31 (0.928-1.89) 1.60 (1.13-2.30) 2.16 (1.53-3.10) 2.66 (1.88-3.$2) 3.15 (2.26-4.48) 3.38 (2.44-4.77) 3.76 (2.74-5.23) 4.16 (3.06-5.69) 4.67 (3.46-6.26) 5.26 (3.92-6.90) 5.48 (4.11-7.12) 5.61 (4.23-7.25) 5.99 (4.56-7.65) 6.35 (4.86-8.04) 7.43 (5.74-9.25) 8.43 (6.55-10.4) 9.82 (7.68-12.0) 11.1 (8.72-13.4) 200 1.06 (0.719-1.56) 1.55 (1.05-2.28) 1.89 (1.28-2.78) 2.55 (1.74-3.76) 3.14 (2.14-4.64) 3.74 (2.57-5.44) 4.01 (2.78-5.79) 4.44 (3.11-6.32) 4.86 (3.43-6.80) 5.35 (3.81-7.35) 5.92 (4.24-7.96) 6.14 (4.43-8.18) 6.28 (4.55-8.32) 6.67 (4.88-8.73) 7.03 (5.17-9.13) 8.13 (6.04-10.4) 9.18 (6.86-11.6) 10.6 (8.00-13.3) 12.0 (9.06-14.9) 500 1.29 (0.846-1.95) 1.89 (1.24-2.86) 2.31 (1.51-3.49) 3.12 (2.04-4.72) 3.86 (2.52-5.83) 4.59 (3.04-6.84) 4.93 (3.28-7.29) 5.43 (3.66-7.92) 5.87 (3.99-8.42) 6.32 (4.33-8.90) 6.81 (4.70-9.40) 7.04 (4.89-9.62) 7.20 (5.03-9.78) 7.60 (5.35-10.2) 7.96 (5.64-10.6) 9.08 (6.50-11.9) 10.2 (7.32-13.1) 11.7 (8.48-15.0) 13.1 (9.56-16.7) 1000 1.49 (0.942-2.25) 2.18 (1.38-3.30) 2.66 (1.68-4.02) 3.60 (2.28-5.44) 4.45 (2.32-6.73) 5.30 (3.39-7.91) 5.69 (3.66-8.42) 6.26 (4.07-9.13) 6.71 (4A2-9.65) 7.11 (4.73-10.1) 7.51 (5.05-10.6) 7.74 (5.24-10.7) 7.91 (5.38-10.9) 8.32 (5.71-11.3) 8.67 (5.99-11.7) 9.79 (6.85-13.0) 10.9 (7.67-14.3) 12.5 (8.84-16.2) 14.0 (9.94-18.0) 1 Precipitation frequency (PF) estimates in this table are based on frequency analysis of partial duration series (PDS). Numbers in parenthesis are PF estimates at lower and upper bounds of the 90% confidence interval. The probability that precipitation frequency estimates (for a given duration and average recurrence interval) will be greater than the upper bound (or less than the lower bound) is 5%. Estimates at upper bounds are not checked against probable maximum precipitation (PMP) estimates and may be higher than currently valid PIMP values. Please refer to NOAA Atlas 14 document for more information. Back to Top https://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsclpfds/pfds_printpage.html?lat=40.0795&Ion-104.8459&data=depth&units=eriglish&series=pds 1/4 3/7/2019 Precipitation Frequency Data Server PF graphical PD -based depth -duration -frequency (DDF) curves Latitude: 40.0795°, Longitude: -104.8459° .0459` 14 12 14 12 10 B 6 4 2 c c • .® rn d. I- th N ration ro ro n3 n3 n3 n3 (13 n3 al -O -O V -O -O - -O-O r in RI' tom- 0 0 0 0 - N � JD 2 5 10 NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 8, Version 2 .25 50 100 200 Average recurrence interval (years) 500 1000 Created {GMT)_ Thu Mar 7 21-35-04 2018 Back to Top Maps & aerials small scale terrain Average recurrence interval i cam) 1 2. 5 10 25 50 100 200 500 1000 Duration 5 -mm n 2 -day 10 -min 3 -day 15 -mart 4 -day 30 -min 7 -day 150 -min — 10 -day 2 -hr 20 -day 3 -hr 30 -day 6 -hr 45 -day 12 -hr 60 -day 24 -hr https://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/pfds_printpage.html?lat=40.0795&lon=-104.B459&data=depth&units=eriglish&series=pds 2/4 3/7/2019 Precipitation Frequency Data Server f a� -ar#.-Lu ion' _ T I. 3km 2tni i Large scale terrain Large scale map ti Fort Celli 100km 4rni B S C ih en,n; r� Greeley n rant .oiomt per ngas a +1 Large scale aerial https://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsclpfds/pfds_printpage.html?Iat=40.0795&Ion=-104.8459&data=depth&units=eriglish&series=pds 3/4 3/7/2019 Precipitation Frequency Data Server Back to Top US Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Weather Service National Water Center 1325 East West Highway Silver Spring, MD 20910 Questions`: HDSC.Questions@noaa.gov Disclaimer https://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/pfds_printpage.html?lat=40.0795&lon=-104.8459&data=depth&units=eriglish&series=pds 4/4 AGPROfessionais Dry. ( PE. R_SCH-AC k1111 TI 3050 67th Avenue, Suite 200 Greeley, CO 80634 Telephone (970) 535-9318 www.agpros.com Project Number: 1353-01 Date: 4/3/19 4:04 PM Designed By: AG PROfessionals Sheet: of Checked By: CTV Subject: Impervious Area Calculation Overall Proposed Basin User Entry Solving for the Percent Impervious (I): Description per U DFCD Table 6-3 % Impervious Total Sq Ft Acres Impervious Roofs 90% 7,377 0.15 Drive and Walk 90% 436 0.01 Agriculture 2% 37,218 0.02 Gravel Road 40% 37,026 0.34 Pond 100% 16,389 0.38 None 01,E 0.00 None 0% 0.00 None 0% 0.00 None 0% 0.00 None 0% 0.00 None 0% 0.00 Undefined land use 45% 0.00 None 0% 0.00 None 0% 0.00 None 0% 0.00 None 0% 0.00 Square Feet 98,445 Acres Total Impervious Acres 38,975 0.89 Total Development Acres 98,445 i 2.26 0.89 Development %l Actual Design I 40% AGPROfessionais Dry. ( PE. R_SCH-AC k1111 TI 3050 67th Avenue, Suite 200 Greeley, CO 80634 Telephone (970) 535-9318 www.agpros.com Project Number: 1353-01 Date: 4/3/19 4:22 PM Designed By: AG PROfessionals Sheet: of Checked By: CTV Subject: Impervious Area Calculation Proposed Basin A User Entry Solving for the Percent Impervious (I): Description per UDFCD Table 6-3 % Impervious Total Sq Ft Acres Impervious Roofs 90% 5,569 0.12 Agriculture 2% 15,298 0.01 Gravel Road 40% 1,750 0.02 Drive and Walk 90% 290 0.01 None 0% 0.00 None 0% 0.00 None 0% 0.00 None 0% 0.00 None 0% 0.00 None 0% 0.00 None 0% 0.00 None 0% 0.00 None 0% 0.00 None 0% 0.00 None 0% 0.00 None 0% 0.00 Square Feet 22,907 Acres Total Impervious Acres 6,279 0.14 Total Development Acres 22,907 0.53 0.14 Development %l Actual Design 27% AGPROfessionais Dry. ( PE. R_SCH-AC k1111 TI 3050 67th Avenue, Suite 200 Greeley, CO 80634 Telephone (970) 535-9318 www.agpros.com Project Number: 1353-01 Date: 4/3/19 4:28 PM Designed By: AG PROfessionals Sheet: of Checked By: CTV Subject: Impervious Area Calculation Proposed Basin B User Entry Solving for the Percent Impervious (I): Description per U DFCD Table 6-3 % Impervious Total Sq Ft Acres Impervious Roofs 90% 1,808 0.04 Agriculture 2% 21,740 0.01 Gravel Road 40% 28,742 0.26 Drive and Walk 90% 146 0.00 Pond 100% 16,389 0.38 None 01,E 0.00 None 0% 0.00 None 0% 0.00 None 0% 0.00 None 0% 0.00 None 0% 0.00 None 0% 0.00 None 0% 0.00 None 0% 0.00 None 0% 0.00 None 0% 0.00 Square Feet 68,825 Acres Total Impervious Acres 30,079 0.69 Total Development Acres 68,825 1.58 0.69 Development %l Actual Design 44% DETENTION VOLUME BY THE MODIFIED FAA METHOD Project: Ruiz Trucking Basin ID: Historic Runoff (For catchments less than 160 acres only. For larger (NOTE: for catchments larger than 90 acres, CUHP catchments, use hydrograph hydrograph and routing are routing method) recommended) Determination of MINOR Detention Volume Using Modified FAA, Method Determination of MAJOR Detention Volume Using Modified FAA Method Design Information (Input): Design Information (Input): Catchment Drainage Imperviousness la = 2.00 percent Catchment Drainage Imperviousness la = 2.00 percent Catchment Drainage Area A = 2.26 acres Catchment Drainage Area A = 2.260 acres Predevelopment NRCS Soil Group Type = B A, B, C, or D Predevelopment NRCS Soil Group Type = B A, B, C; or D Return Period for Detention Control T = 10 years (2, 5, 10, 25. 50, or 100) Return Period for Detention Control T = 100 years (2, 5, 10, 25, 50, or 100) Time of Concentration of Watershed Tc = 12.3 minutes Time of Concentration of Watershed Tc = 12 minutes Allowable Unit Release Rate q= 0.00 cfsfacre Allowable Unit Release Rate q= 0_00 cfs/acre One -hour Precipitation P1 = 1.38 inches One -hour Precipitation P1 = 2.66 inches Design Rainfall IDF Formula i = C1* Pif(C2+TJAC3 Design Rainfall IDE Formula i = C.( P1f(C2+Te)"C3 Coefficient One C1 = 28.50 Coefficient One C1 = 28.50 Coefficient Two C2 = 10 Coefficient Two C2 = 10 Coefficient Three C3 = 0.789 Coefficient Three C3 = 0.789 Determination of Average Outflow from the Basin (Calculated): Determination of Average Outflow from the Basin (Calculated): Runoff Coefficient C = 0.17 Runoff Coefficient C = 0.36 Inflow Peak Runoff Qp-in = 1.30 cfs Inflow Peak Runoff Op -in =1 5.32 cfs Allowable Peak Outflow Rate Op -out = 0.00 cfs Allowable Peak Outflow Rate Op -out = 0.00 cfs udfcd spreadsheet 10 yr rate.xls, Modified FAA 4/4/2019, 10:24 A(M1 CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RATIONAL METHOD Project Title: Catch ment ID: Ruiz Trucking, LLC Proposed Run-off I. Catchment Hydrologic Data Catchment ID = Overall Area = 2.26 Acres Percent Imperviousness = 2.00 % NRCS Soil Type = B A,B,C,orD I. Rainfall Information I (inchfhr) = Cl * P1 /(C2 + Td)"C3 Design Storm Return Period, Tr = 10 years Cl = 28.50 C2= 10.00 C3= 0.786 P1= 1.38 inches (input return period for design storm) (input the value of C1) (input the value of O2) (input the value of O3) (input one -hr precipitation --see Sheet "Design Info") III. Analysis of Flaw Time (Time of Concentration) for a Catchment Runoff Coefficient, C = Overide Runoff Coefficient, C = 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, O-5 = Overide 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C = 0.17 0.08 (enter an overide C value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C.) (enter an overide O-5 value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C-5.) Illustration LEGEND RR if Flow D irec lion C ate hi -Ike nit Boundary. NRCS Land Type Conveyance Heavy Meadow 2.5 Tillage/ Field 5 Short Pasture/ Lawns 7 Nearly Bare Ground 10 Grassed Swales/ Waterways 15 Paved Areas & Shallow Paved Swales (Shoot Flow) 20 Calculations: Reach ID Overland 1 2 3 Slope S ft/it input 4 5 0.0400 Sum Length L ft input 5-yr Runoff Coeff 0-5 output 416 0.08 416 N RC S Convey- ance input N/A Flow Velocity V fps output Flow Time Tf minutes output 0.29 23.73 Computed Tc = Regional Tc = User -Entered Tc = 23.73 12.31 12.31 UD-Rational v1.02a Historical Flo ws.As, Tc and Peak() 4/4/2010, 10:28 AM HOD king, LLC Proposed Runoff (For catchments less than 160 acres only. For larger catchments, use hydrograph routing method) (NOTE: for catchments larger than 90 acres, GUHP hydrograph and routing are recommended) Determination of MAJOR Detention Volume Using Modified FAA Method 0 r C3 6 LO in cn a i L Cv 6 0 LD s C w 3) t L t m w a) t) m <t > E c .E 2.260 001. 2.66 a) ai 0 0 co `r'. o cv O�Ilml flYO Determination of Average Outflow from the Basin Runoff Coefficient C = Inflow Peak Runoff Op -in =I Allowable Peak Outflow Rate Op -out = Design Information (Input): Catchment Drainage Imperviousness Catchment Drainage Area Predevelopment NRCS Soil Group Return Period for Detention Control Time of Concentration of Watershed Allowable Unit Release Rate One -hour Precipitation Design Rainfall IDF Formula i = C1 Pit( Coefficient One Coefficient Two Coefficient Three C LL! LL O 2 Determination of MINOR Detention Volume Using Modified FAA Method 13 a L 0 C6 Lc trJ u) u U BY TI Lci Q 1OA NOI 0 LF3 o 7 Q - a `} En C) in ter U i 3 0 u} U ?+ E4? .G 40.00 0L 0) = co ice} 6c\ici C‘i CO CI C3 _ tV cu m tT? nor O CO In Nr p r. o Determination of Average Outflow from the Basin I Runoff Coefficient C = Inflow Peak Runoff Op -in =I Allowable Peak Outflow Rate Op -out = Design Information (Input): Catchment Drainage Imperviousness Catchment Drainage Area Predevelopment NRCS Soil Group Return Period for Detention Control Time of Concentration of Watershed Allowable Unit Release Rate One -hour Precipitation Design Rainfall IDF Formula i = C1 P11( Coefficient One Coefficient Two Coefficient Three . . � • - 11) C o cio L co 0. M 4/4/2019, 10:27 AM udfcd spreadsheet.xls, Modified FAA CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RATIONAL METHOD Project Title: Catch ment ID: Ruiz Trucking, LLC Proposed Run-off I. Catchment Hydrologic Data Catchment IDS Area = Percent Imperviousness = NRCS Soil Type = Overall 2.26 40.00 B I. Rainfall Information Design Storm Return Period, Tr = 1 = C2= C3= P1= Acres A,B,C,orD I (inchfhr) = Cl * P1 /(C2 + Td)'C3 100 28.50 10.00 0.786 2.66 years (input return period for design storm) (input the value of C1) (input the value of O2) (input the value of O3) inches (input one -hr precipitation --see Sheet "Design Info") III. Analysis of Flaw Time (Time of Concentration) for a Catchment Runoff Coefficient, C = Overide Runoff Coefficient, C = 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, O-5 = Overide 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C = 0.50 0.30 (enter an overide C value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C.) (enter an overide O-5 value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C-5.) Illustration LEGEND U Beginning, Flow D irec lion C ate hi -Ike nit Boundary. NRCS Land Type Conveyance Heavy Meadow 2.5 Tillage/ Field 5 Short Pasture/ Lawns 7 Nearly Bare Ground 10 Grassed Swales/ Waterways 15 Paved Areas & Shallow Paved Swales (Shoot Flow) 20 Calculations: Reach ID Overland Slope S ft/it input Length L ft input 5-yr Runoff Coeff O-5 output N RC S Convey- ance input Flow Velocity V fps output Flow Time Tf minutes output 0.0400 354 0.30 N/A 0.34 17.26 1 2 3 4 5 Sum 354 Computed Tc = Regional Tc = User -Entered Tc = 17.26 11.97 11.97 UD-Rational v1.02a Proposed Flow.xls, To and PeakO 4/4/2019, 10:27 AM Calculation of Peak Runoff using Rational Method Ow,igner: ',;:�Icnc Licklcv Company: A' ni.0185si':ria Date:=:!::2c1'; Prajcrt: Ruj; TI n:l:iny I I Location: ForsLtticito.. Vcr ion 2.00 rc4_:eticd fela 2917 reel of tl'l; :i:.:Jr t9icr f•? rer,!Iea a per -I ^::..1 id If. co:n :in:. Ic: '4:UluI:il ;n••niii h: s:,L u::: 4i Livricc rid c'v rrP�c u.';t-_(1.1 <;nrrpi.l::1ii =ii -1 1. I L, _� `: r., — 1 j) + — T., •rc.In_rcn= 1U-i7%inl innn-urhanl Seler..:ed -,. = :n1\< _„ :,, ,,. „ , ni:nf CC-nil;ute:1 t,. , rie .nr..rl k. [I [I Inr.:ti:n ff:1- if -VA F•IIIS 1 `' pair:ail ctdl .: t:Y,r i li -1 CU ...p-:ir ': i . - itwn dial'?rtg. nbr:;inr:d --rnrr 2-yr 5-yr 10-yr 25-yr 5D-yr 100-yr 566-yr 1 -hour rslnisll depth. P1 tin) = al -12, I 1.'1 I 1.:,cS Hi:: I 2.22 I 2.tti I 'd.cei ltiinhll Inten-sits' En unlion CoelTicients = rl1, ..°Q I -Cf.u] I Lt, 757i :s r a T(r.' :ihr'1 = ? L t,,)'; •P-1.dti'.,r.L;il..:i_:hrt 1- Inki Subcatt:hment rJi5mc Area i,.;'I NRCs :Soil Graup Percent Runoff Coefficient, C Overland fin lllail Flryw Time Channel Ized :Travel) Flow Time Time of Concentration Rai rural I nten5It'; , I [In ntl Peak Flow, G j clel 2-yr 5-yr 1D-�yr 25_yr SG-yrr' 10o-y�r' 509-yr Overland ROW Length L, (fiti U:S Elevation (it) 0c onn l QiS Elevation {tt) I:Optiona''i Overland Flow Slope S, Ittift) ♦?Vert:In i Hydrologic Computed Regional Selected Hydrologic Flow Time I, Irvin] Cliannetized Flow Length t_, Itt) U'S Eler-(ion (110 I tOptionelf WS Elevation Di) ,gDyriore.:., i Clhanfellzcri FI{,yrSlope Si {f+1H) MRCS conveys nee Factor K CFianrAlzea Flow Velocity V. (Pulver) Cmanneiiaru Flow lime tr jrninl tclmini t, (min) - - tclmin) 2-yr ster le-yr 25-ri so-yr 1on-yr :Sa9-err 2-yrr' S-yr 14-yr 25-yr so-yr 100-yr 599-yr Subbas nA 3:5' 6 27._ 318 C' 21 ill, H2 li.•1r_ 6:1 0.-.3., 14 cc i::rij 10 7c- 20o.(. n.iii0 I:`- - 3.22 ,. 11.x=. 2'2.06 Ii. 00 2.S3 _.:. 32 Gr:l r.72 9Tr 20 0_•i 3G1 I: 3 1A2 .00 2 F>ubbat n 6 'I.6 5 44.0 •t32 f:: 5 1).41 i75:'s fi.5T ?i. P;' it `•1 - 3.`,4.cr' C 34.I 15.'=•• fl;:):i ::.)loft i 5 is lit [tic;1F.'2 15. a s 5 199 �. ' '. ;1.11 I:IL L :::'s a'=. 4. 5.RF ft Ct •n? :). 1 :i 5 . 1'': 'i:':4 4.43 . .9 51 9. :le% r_-1 :).1S E 4ii.4 j2 F.: S2 0. C.5ii 0,35 aril ii. E. I4ii.CC 0:41 10.2 uccc ,_l.iuiii 1.5 C.05 U.4? 111.5 12i.2i_ 1' c≥ 2.'1:: .,1i� c,5 <'-. �.,:: ?ii5 I;. J c.2 009 0 4 i:s n < c')5., -:5 I Ruiz Trucking, LLC APPENDIX B Hydraulic Computations DETENTION VOLUME BY THE MODIFIED FAA METHOD Project: Ruiz Trucking, LLC Basin ID: 5 -Year Historic Release Rate (For catchments less than 160 acres only. For larger (NOTE: for catchments larger than 90 acres, CUHP catchments, use hydrograph hydrograph and routing are routing method) recommended) Determination of MINOR Detention Volume Using Modified FAA, Method Determination of MAJOR Detention Volume Using Modified FAA Method Design Information (Input): Design Information (Input): Catchment Drainage Imperviousness la = 2.00 percent Catchment Drainage Imperviousness la = 2.00 percent Catchment Drainage Area A = 2.26 acres Catchment Drainage Area A = 2.260 acres Predevelopment NRCS Soil Group Type = B A, B, C, or D Predevelopment NRCS Soil Group Type = B A, B, C; or D Return Period for Detention Control T = 5 years (2, 5, 10, 25, 50, or 100) Return Period for Detention Control T = 100 years (2, 5, 10, 25, 50, or 100) Time of Concentration of Watershed Tc = 12 minutes Time of Concentration of Watershed Tc = 12.31 minutes Allowable Unit Release Rate q= 0_00 cfs/acre Allowable Unit Release Rate q= 0.00 cfs/acre One -hour Precipitation Pi = 1.11 inches One -hour Precipitation Pi = 2.66 inches Design Rainfall IDF Formula i = C1* P1I(C2+TJ'C3 Design Rainfall IDF Formula i = C1 P1I(C2+TJAC3 Coefficient One C1 = 28.50 Coefficient One C1 = 28.50 Coefficient Two C2 = 10 Coefficient Two C2 = 10 Coefficient Three C3 = 0.789 Coefficient Three C3 = 0.789 Determination of Average Outflow from the Basin (Calculated): Determination of Average Outflow from the Basin (Calculated): Runoff Coefficient C = 0.08 Runoff Coefficient C = 0.36 Inflow Peak Runoff Op -in = 0.49 cfs Inflow Peak Runoff Op -in =1 5.32 cfs Allowable Peak Outflow Rate Qp-out = 0.00 cfs Allowable Peak Outflow Rate Qo-out = 0.00 cfs udfcd spreadsheet_5 yr rate.xls. Modified FAA 4/4/2019, 10:32 AM DETENTION VOLUME BY THE MODIFIED FAA METHOD Project: Basin ID: Ruiz Trucking, LIC Proposed Runoff (For catchments less than 160 acres only. For larger catchments, use hydrograph routing method) (NOTE: for catchments larger than 90 acres, CUHP hydrograph and routing are recommended Determination of MNOR Detention Volume Using Modified FAA Method Determination of MAJOR Detention Volume Using Modified FAA Method Design Information (input): I, = A = Type = T = Te = q = P. = C. = C:1= C2 = percent acres A. 6, C.orD years (2, 5,10, 25, 50, or 100) minutes cfs:acro inches Design Information (Input): !, = A = Type = T = Tc = q = P. = C. = C_ = C:! = 40.00 percent acres A, B, C, or D years (2, 5, 10, 25, 50, or 100) minutes cfsracre inches Catchment Drainage mperviousness Catchment Drainage Area Predevelopment NRCS Soil Group Return Period for Detention Control Time of Concentration of Watershed Allowable Unit Release Rate One -hour Precipitation Design Rainfall IDF Formula i = C1' P,1(Ci+Tc)^Ca Coefficient One Coefficient Two Coefficient Three 40.00 Catchment Drainage Imperviousness Catchment Drainage Area Prcdevelopnent NRCS Soil Group Return Period for Detention Control Time of Concentration of Watershed Allowable Unit Release Rate One -hour Precipitation Design Rainfall IDF Formula i = C1' P11(Ct+TJAC3 Coefficient One Coefficient Two Coefficient Three 2.26 2.260 B B 10 100 0.00 0.22 1 .38 2.66 28.50 28.50 10 10 0.789 0.789 Determination of Average Outflow from the Basin (Calculated): cfs cfs Determination of Average Outflow from the Basin (Calculated): ors cis Runoff Coefficient Inflow Peak Runoff Allowable Peak Cutfiow Rate C = Runoff Coefficient Cr- Inflow Peak Runoff Op -in = Allowable Peak Outflow Rate Qp-out = 0.50 Qp-in = 8.45 Qp-out = 0.49 Mod. FAA Minor Storage Volume = Mod. FAA Minor Storage Volume e cubic feet acre 4t Mod. FAA Major Storage Volume = Mod. FAA Major Storage Volume = 12.155 cubic feet acre -ft 0.28 20 •:- Enter Rainfall Duration incremental hcrease Value Here (o.q. 5 fors -Minutes) Rainfall Duration minutes (input) Rainfall Intensity inches: hr (output) hflow Volume acre-feet (output) Adjustment Factor "m" (output) Average Outflow cfs (output) Cutftow Volume acre-feet (output) Storage Volume acre-feet (output) Rainfall Duration rnnutes tinput) Rainfall htensity inches' hr (output) hflow Velum: acre-feet (output) Adjustment Factor "m" (output) Average Outflow cfs (output) Outflow Volume acre-feet (output) Storage Volume acre-feet (output) 0 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 0 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 20 2.69 0.060 0.72 0.00 0.000 0.060 20 5.18 0.161 0.72 0.36 0.010 0.151 40 1.80 0.080 0.61 0.00 0.000 0.080 40 3.46 0.215 0.61 0.30 0.017 0.199 60 1.38 0.093 0.57 0.00 0000 0.093 60 2.65 0.248 0.57 0.28 0.023 0.225 80 1.13 0.101 056 0.00 0.000 0.101 80 2.18 0.271 0.58 0.27 0:030 0.241 100 0.96 0108 054 0.00 0.000 0.108 100 1.86 0.289 0.54 0.27 0.037 0.252 120 0.84 0.114 0.54 0.00 0.000 0.114 120 1.63 0.304 0,54 0.26 0.044 0.260 140 0.75 0.118 0.53 0.00 0:000 0.118 140 1.45 0.317 0.58 0.26 0.050 0267 160' 0.68 0.123 0.53 0.00 0.000 0A23 160 1.32 0328 0.58 0.26 0.057 0.271 180 0.63 0.126 0.52 0.00 0.000 0.126 180 121 0.338 0.52 026 0.064 0.274 200 0.58 0.130 0.52 0.00 0.000 0.130 200 1.12 0.347 052 026 0}.07'1 0.276 220 0.54 0136 0.52 0.00 0.000 0.133 220 1.04 0.356 052 026 0.078 0.278 240 0.50 0,138 0.52 01,00 0.000 0.136 240 0.97 0.363 0.52 0.26 0.064 0.279 260 0.47 0.138 0.52 0,00 0.000 0.138 260 0.91 0.370 O.€x2 0.25 0.0181 0.279 280 0.45 0141 0.52 0.00 0.000 0.141 280 0.86 0377 0.52 025 0.098 0.279 300 0.43 0.143 0.51 0.00 0.000 0.143 300 0.82 0.383 051 0.25 0,105 0.278 320 0.41 0.145 0.51 0,00 0.000 0.145 320 0.78 0.388 0.51 025 0.112 0277 340 0.39 0.147 051 0.00 0.000 0.147 340 0.75 0.395 051 0.25 0.118 0276 360 0.37 0.149 0.51 01,00 0.000 0.149 360 0.71 0400 0.51 0.25 0.125 0.275 380 0.36 0,151 051 0,00 0.000 0.151 380 0.68 0.4'05 0.51 0.25 0.132 0.273 400 0.34 0.153 051 0.00 0.000 0.153 400 0.66 0.410 0.51 025 0.139 0.271 420 0.33 0.155 051 0,00 0.000 0.155 420 0.63 0.414 0.51 0.25 0.146 0.269 440 0.32 0.156 0.51 0.00 0;000 0.156 440 0.61 4.419 0051 025 0.152 0.266 460 021 0.158 0.51 0.00 0.000 0.158 460 0.59 0.423 051 0.25 0.159 0.264 480 0.30 0.160 0.51 0;00 0.000 0.160 480 0.57 0.427 0.51 025 0.166 0.261 500 0.29 0.161 0.51 0.00 0.000 0.161 500 055 0.431 051 0.25 0.173 0.258 520 0:28 0.162 0,51 0.00 0.000 0.162 520 051 0.435 0.51 025 0.179 0.255 540 027 0.164 051 0.00 0.000 DA 64 540 0.52 0.439 0.51 025 0.186 0.252 560 0.26 0.165 0.51 0.00 0.000 0.165 560 0.61 0.442 0.51 0.25 0,198 0.249 580 0.25 0.167 0.51 0.00 0.000 0.167 580 0.49 0.446 0.51 025 0.200 0.246 600 0.25 0,168 051 0.00 0.000 I 0.188 600 0.48 0.449 0.51 0.25 0,207 0.243 620 0.24 0,169 0.51 0.00 0.000 0.189 620 0.47 0.452 0.51 0.25 0.213 0239 640 0.24 0.170 051 0.00 0.000 0.170' 640 0.46 0.456 0.51 0.25 0.220 0.236 660 023 0,171 0.51 0.00 0.000 0.171 660 0.45 0.459 0.51 025 0.227 0.232 680 0.23 13.178 051 0.00 0.000 0.173 680 0.44 0.462 0.51 0.25 0.234 0.228 70.0 0.22 0.174. 0.51 0.00 0.000 0.174 700 0.43 0465 0.51 025 0.241 0.22.4 720 0.22 0.175 0.51 0.00 0.000 0.175 720 0.42 0.468 051 0.25 0.247 0.220 740 021 0.176 0,51 0.00 0.000 0.176 740 0.41 0471 0.51 025 0.254 0.217 780 0.21 0.177 051 0.00 0,000 0.177 760 0.40 0.473 051 0.25 0.281 0.213 780 020 0.178 0.51 0.00 0.000 0.178 780 039 0.476 051 025 0.268 0.208 800 0.20 0.179 0.51 0.00 0.000 0.179 800 0.38 0.479 051 025 0.274 0.204 820 0.20 0.180 0.51 0.00 0.000 0.180 820 0.38 0.481 051 0,25 0.281 0.200 840 0.19 0.181 0.51 0.00 0.000 0.181 840 0.37 0.484 051 0.25 0.288 0.196 860 0.19 0.182 0.51 0.00 0.000 0.182 860 0.36 0.487 0.61 0.25 0.295 0.192 860 0.19 0.183 0.51 0.00 0.000 0.183 880 0.36 0.489 0.51 025 0.302 0.187 900 0.18 0.184 0.50 0.00 0.000 0.184 900 0.35 0.491 050 0.25 0.308 0.183 920 0.18 0.184 050 0.00 0.000 0.184 920 0.34 0.494 0.50 025 0.315 0.179 940 0.18 0.185 050 0.00 0.000 0.185 940 0.34 0.498 050 0.25 0222 0.174 960 0.17 0.186 050 0.00 0.000 0.186 960 023 0.498 0.50 025 0.329 0.170 980 0.17 0157 050 0.00 0.000 0A87 980 023 0.501 0.50 025 0.336 0.165 1000 0.17 0.186 050 01,00 0.000 0.188 1000 0.32 0.503 0.50 025 0242 0.161 1020 0.17 0.159 050 0.00 0.000 0.189 1020 01.32 0.505 0.50 025 0.349' 0.156 1040 0.16 0.189 0.50 0,00 0.000 0.189 1010 0.31 0.507 0.50 025 0256 0151 1060 0.18 0,190 050 0,00 0.000 0.190 1060 0.31 0.509 0.50 0.25 0.368 0.147 1080 0.15 0.191 050 0.00 0.000 0.191 1080 0.30 0.511 0.50 025 0.369 0.142 1100 0.16 0.192 0.50 000 0.000 0.192 1100 020 0.513 0.50 0.25 0.378 0.137 1120 0.15 0.193 0.50 0.00 0.000 0.193 1120 020 0.515 0.50 0.25 0.888 0.132 1140 015 0.193 0.50 0.00 0.000 0.193 1140 0.29 0.517 0.50 0.25 0290 0.128 1160 0.15 0.194 0.50 0.00 0.000 0.194 1160 0.29 0.519 0.50 0.25 0.397 0.123 1180 _ 0.15 0.195 0.50 0:00 0.000 0.195 1180 0.28 0.521 0.50 0.25 0.403 0.118 1200 0.15 0.195 0.50 0.00 0.000 0.195 1200 0.28 0.523 0.50 0.25 0.410 0.113 Mod. FAA Minor Storage Volume (cubic ft.) = 8,514 Mod. FAA Major Storage Volume (cubic It.) Mod. FAA Minor Storage Volume (acre -ft.) = 0.1955 Mod. FAA Major Storage Volume (acre -It.) _ LJDFCD DETENTION BASIN VOLUME ESTIMATING WORKBOOK Version 2.34, Released November2013 12,155 0.2790 udfcd sproadsheet.xls, Modified FAA 4'5:2019, 11:44 AM Project: Ruiz Trucking, LLC Basin ID: Proposed Runoff Inflow and Outflow Volumes vs. Rainfall Duration 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 MIMS 1 Ill AM R2 I r 1'llllllll"�� � 1�■ ina I prip r AM. UV i -*141111111111°77 0 200 A00 600 800 Duration {Minutes) 1000 1200 - Minor Storm Inflow Volume - Nino r Sturm Cu Wow Vo'u rre Minor Storm Sto,aec Volume Storm Inflow Volume Mzlor ';harm QUliow• volume a MOP Stint *Sags Velum 1400 UDFCD DETENTION BASIN VOLUME ESTIMATING WORKBOOK Version 2.34, Released November2013 I udfcd sproadshoot.4s, Modified FAA 4:5:2019,11:44 AM RESTRICTOR PLATE SIZING FOR CIRCULAR VERTICAL ORIFICES Project: Ruiz Trucking, LLC Basin ID: Proposed Detention Pond Ilia To H X o a o o / _--_ ''-,,, 0 a o a Sizing the Restrictor Plate for Circular Vertical Orifices or Pipes (Input) Water Surface Elevation at Design Depth Pipe/Vertical Orifice Entrance Invert Elevation Required Peak Flow through Orifice at Design Depth Pipe/Vertical Orifice Diameter (inches) Orifice Coefficient Full -flow Capacity (Calculated) Full -flow area Half Central Angle in Radians Full -flow capacity Calculation of Orifice Flow Condition Half Central Angle (OcTheta<3.1416) Flow area Top width of Orifice (inches) Height from Invert of Orifice to Bottom of Plate (feet) Elevation of Bottom of Plate Resultant Peak Flow Through Orifice at Design Depth Width of Equivalent Rectangular Vertical Orifice Elev: WS = Elev: Invert = Dia= Co _ Af = Theta = Of = Percent of Design Flow = #1 Vertical Orifice #2 Vertical Orifice 43988.60 4,987.40 1.30 12.0 3.60 0.79 3.14 3.2 243% Theta = _' To _ `O =1 Elev Plate Bottom Edge = QO 1.32 sgft .27 11.62 feet .37 4,987.77 1.3 cfs feet feet cfs inches sg ft rad cfs rad inches feet Equivalent Width = 0.73 feet udfcd spreadsheet.xls, heet.xl s, Restrictor Plate 4/4/2019, 10:51 AM STAGE -DISCHARGE SIZING OF THE WEIRS AND ORIFICES (INLET CONTROL) Project: Ruiz Trucking, LLC Basin ID: Proposed Detention Pon€1 Current Routing Order is #3 Design Information (Input): Circular Opening: OR Rectangular Opening: Rout tip Order 1 Standard) Diameter in Inches Rournp Order M3 t5iingrm 5capC Width in Feet Length (Height for Vertical) Percentage of Open Area After Trash Rack Reduction Orifice Coefficient Weir Coefficient Orifice Elevation (Bottom for Vertical) Calculation of Collection Capacity: Net Opening Area (after Trash Rack Reduction) OPTIONAL User-Overide Net Opening Area Perimeter as Weir Length OPTIONAL: User-Overide Weir Length Dia. = W= LorH= % open= = R out -op i!tLICr ?? 'e..:;. F.I.. Krim HI S. El...:'I : C a Y F1.Fn • n.�.•. Shcb-a•. n.5. Fl F,.. n.�. -. n.. d1 i.1.. Pip.•IC T.. 'r.S Fl. Mi..•i #2 Horiz. #1 Vert. #1 Horiz. #2 Vert. 3.00 0.73 3,00 0.37 70 100 0.60 0.50 2.65 4988.40 4,987.40 AQ = 6.30 Ac = Lim - 10.20 Top Elevation of Vertical Orifice Opening, Top '= Center Elevation of Vertical Orifice Opening, Cen = 0.27 ft. ft. 4987.77 4987.59 inches ft. ft. V!a ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. ft. ft. Routing 3: Single Stage - Water flows through WQCV plate and #1 horizontal opening into #1 vertical opening. This flow will be applied to culvert sheet (#2 vertical & horizontal openings is not used). Horizontal Orifices Vertical Orifices Labels for WQCV, Miror, & Major Storage W.S. Elevators (input) Water Surface Elevation ft (linked) WQCV Plate/Riser Flow cfs (User-Sakeg " #1 Horiz. Weir Flow cfs (output) #1 Horiz. Orifice Flow cfs (output) #2 Horiz. Weir Flow cfs toutput' #2 Horiz. Orifice Fbw cfs Ioutputl #1 Vert. Collection Capacity cfs Ioutputl #2 Vert. Colection Capacity cfs (output) Total Collection Capacity cis (output) Target Vdurnes for WQCV, Mirror, & Major Storage Vdurnes (lire': for goal seek) 4987.40 #REF! 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #REF! 4987.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.00 4987.80 0.00 _ 0.00 0.00 0.00 _ 0.00 0.60 0.00 _ 0.00 WQCV 4988.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.84 0.00 0.01 4988.20 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.02 0.00 0.01 4988.40 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.17 0.00 0.01 100 -Yea r WS E 4988.80 0.01 242 13.67 0.00 0.00 1.31 0.00 1.31 4988.80 0.02 6.84 19.19 0.00 0.00 1.43 0.00 1.43 4989.00 0.02 12.56 23.50 0.00 0.00 1.55 0.00 1.55 4989.20 0.02 19.34 27.13 0.00 0.00 1.65 0.00 1.65 4989.40 0.02 27.03 30.33 0.00 0.00 1.75 0.00 1.75 Top of Berm 4989.80 0.02 35.53 33.23 0.00 0.00 1.85 0.00 1.85 4989,80 0.02 44.78 35.89 0.00 0.00 1.93 0.00 1.93 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N1A #N1A #N/A 0.00 #N1A #N1A #N/A #N/A #NIA #N/A #N1A 0.00 #N1A #N1A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 0.00 #N/A MA #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 0.00 #N/A #N1A #N/A #N/A #N/A #14/A #14/A 0.00 #N1A #N1A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N1A #N1A 0.00 _ #N/A #N1A #N/A N/A #NfA #N/A #N/A 0.00 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N1A 0.00 #N1A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N1A #N1A 0.00 #N/A #N/A #N1A _ #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 0.00 #N1A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 0.00 #N1A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 0.00 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A # N/A #N/A #N/A 0.00 #N1A #N/A #N/A ##NfA #N/A #N/A #N/A 0.00 #N1A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 0.00 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N1A #N/A 0.00 #N1A #N/A #N/A #NIA #N/A #N/A _ #N/A 0.00 #FN/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N1A #N/P, UN/A 0.00 #N1A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 0.00 #N1A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #14/A MA 0.00 #N/A #N1A #NfA #N/A #NfA #1V/A #N/A 0.00 # N /A #N1A #N/A #N/A #N/A #1V/A #N/A 0.00 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 0.00 #N1A #N/A #N/A #N1A #N/A #N/A #N/A 0.00 /MIA #N/A #N/A J #NIA #N/A #N/A #N1A 0.00 //NIA #N/A #N/A #N/A #N /A #N/A #N/A 0.00 #N/A #N1A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 0.00 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A MA 0.00 #N1A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 0.00 I #N1A #N1A #N1A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N1A 0.00 #N1A #N/A #N /A #N/A # N/A #N/A #N/A 0.00 # N /A tidied spreadsheet...ds,Outlet 4/4/2019, 10:52 AM STAGE -DISCHARGE SIZING OF THE WEIRS AND ORIFICES (INLET CONTROL) Project: Ruiz Trucking, LLC Basin ID: Proposed Detention Pond STAGE -DISCHARGE CURVE FOR THE OUTLET STRUCTURE 4990.4 4989.9 S a) C) yyF C 4 — vise C) U, 4989.4 4988.9 4988.4 4987.9 4 4987.4 • 0 as '1 1.5 Discharge (cfs) 2 2.5 udfcd spreadsheet.xls, Outlet 4/412019, 10:52 AM STAGE -STORAGE SIZING FOR DETENTION BASINS Project: Ruiz Trucking, LLC Basin ID: Proposed Detention Pond Dam `may Imo_ w Y Side Slope 2 } - Flow Site Slope Z Design Information (Input): Width of Basin Bottom, VV = Length of Basin Bottom, L Dam Side -slope (H:V), Zd = Stage -Storage Relationship: Dam 4.00 Side Slope Z t _ Firm ft ft ft/ft 1. L Side Slope Z } Check Basin Shape Right Triangle Isosceles Triangle Rectangle Circle / Ellipse Irregular Storage Requirement from Sheet 'Modified FAA': Storage Requirement from Sheet 'Hpdrograph': Storage Requirement from Sheet 'Full -Spectrum': L How �,,'" OR,.. OR... OR... OR... (Use Overide values in cells G32:G52) MINOR MAJOR 0.20 0.28 acre -ft. acre -ft. acre -ft. Labels for WQCV, Minor, & Major Storage Stages (input;} Water Surface Elevation ft (input) Side Slope (H:V) ft/ft Below El. (input) Basin Width at Stage ft (output) Basin Length at Stage ft (output; Surface Area at Stage ft2 (output) Surface Area at Stage ft2 User Overide Volume Below Stage ft3 (output) Surface Area at Stage acres (output) Volume Below Stage acre -ft (output) Target Volumes for WCV, Minor, & Major Storage Volumes (for goal seek) 4987.40 3 0.000 0.000 4987.60 4.00 0.00 0.00 2,093 210 0.048 0.005 4987.80 4.00 0.00 0.00 6,887 1,108 0.158 0.025 WQCV 4988.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 11,295 2,926 0.259 0.067 4988.20 4.00 0.00 0.00 13,147 5,370 0.302 0.123 4988A0 4.00 0.00 0.00 13,600 8,045 0.312 0.185 4988.60 4.00 0.00 0.00 14,057 10,810 0.323 0.248 100 -year W S E 4988.80 4.00 0.00 0.00 14,518 13,668 0.333 0.314 4989.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 14,983 16,618 0.344 0.381 4989.20 4.00 0.00 0.00 15,452 19,661 0.355 0.451 4989.40 4.00 0.00 0.00 15,925 22,799 0.366 0.523 4989.60 4.00 0.00 0.00 16,389 26,030 0.376 0.598 Top of Pond 4989.80 4.00 0.00 0.00 16,854 29,355 0.387 0.674 #NIA #N/A #NIA #NIA #N/A #NIA #N/A #N/A #NIA #NIA #NIA #NIA #NIA #NIA #N/A #N/A #NIA #NIA #N/A #N/A #NIA #NIA #NIA #N/A #NIA #N/A #NIA #N/A #NIA #NIA #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #NIA #NIA #N/A #NIA #NIA #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #NIA #NIA #N/A #NIA #N/A #NIA #N/A #NIA #NIA #NIA #N/A #NIA #NIA udfcd spr adsheet.xis, Basin 419/2019, 11:18 AM STAGE -STORAGE SIZING FOR DETENTION BASINS Project: Basin ID: yr STAGE -STORAGE CURVE FOR THE POND 4990.40 4989.90 4989.40 4988.90 4988.40 4987.90 4987.40 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 Storage (acre-feet) 0.70 0.80 udfcd spreadsheet.xls, Basin 4/9/2019,11:18 AM STAGE -DISCHARGE SIZING OF THE OUTLET CULVERT (INLET vs. OUTLET CO NTROL WITH TAILWATER EFFECTS) Project: Ruiz Trucking, LLC Basin ID: Pro posed Detention Pond Status: Sheet Contains Warrirxds. See Culvert ErrorList Range Design Information (Input): Circular Culvert: Barrel Diameter in Inches Circular Culvert: Inlet Edge Type (choose from pill -down list) OR: Box Culvert: Barrel Height (Rise) in Feet Box Culvert: Barrel Width (Span) in Feet Box Culvert: Inlet Edge Type (choose from pul-down ist) Number of Barrels Inbt Elevation at Culvert Invert Outlet Elevation at Culvert Invert Culvert Length in Feet Manning's Roughness Bend Loss Coefficient Exit Loss Coefficient Design Information (calculated'. Entrance Loss Coefficient Friction Loss Coefficient Sum of Al Loss Coefficients Orifice Inlet Condition Coefficient Minimum Energy Condition Coefficient Calculations of Culvert Capacity (output): Catme f ono* VI* H ape se Sed is1 D culvert s•lec It L 1° taken x-eecdn eat 12 Grooved End with Headwall Height (Rise) = Width (Span) = &I re Edge w/ 90-15 deg. Flared Wirgwall No = lelev = �alav = L= n= Kb _ Kx_ K8= Kr = Ks= Cd= K E lac 1 4987.40 4987.30 12.0 0.0130 0.00 1.00 0.20 0.37 1.57 0.99 -0.09 in. ft. ft. ft. ebv. ft. ebv. ft. Itiltveme Water Surface Elevation From Sheet "Basin" (it., linked) Tailwater Surface Elevation ft (input ii known) CulvertCulvert Inlet -Control Flow rate cfs (output) Outlet -Control Flow rate cfs (output) Flowrate Into Culvert From Sheet "Outlet" (cfs, linked) Controlling Culvert Flow rate cfs (output) Inlet Equation Used (output) 4987.40 _ 0.00 0.00 0.00 #REF! #REF! No Flow (WS c inlet) 4987.60 0.00 0.20 0.67 0.00 0.00 Min. Energy. Eqn. 4987.80 0.00 0.60 1.11 0.00 0.00 Min. Energy. Eqn. 4988.00 0 00 1.10 1.41 0.01 0.01 Regression Eqn. 4988.20 0.00 1.80 1.48 0.01 0.01 Regression Eqn. 4986.40 0.00 2.50 1.66 0.01 0.01 Regression Eqn. 4988.60 0 00 3.20 2.23 1.31 1.31 Regression Eqn. 4988.80 0.00 3.80 2.80 1.43 1.43 Regression Eqn. 4989.00 0.00 4.30 3.30 1.55 1.55 Regression Eqn. 4969.20 0.00 4.80 3.74 1.65 1.65 Regression Eqn. 4989.40 0.00 5.20 4.13 1.75 1.75 Regression Eqn. 4989.60 0.00 5.60 4.49 1.85 1.85 Regression Eqn. 4989.80 0.00 6.00 4.81 1.93 1.93 Regression Eqn. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #NIA #NIA No Flow (WS < inlet) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #NIA #NIA No Flow (WS c inlet) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #NIA #NIA No Flow (WS < inlet) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #NIA #NIA No Flow (WS < inlet) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #NIA #NIA No Flow (WS c inlet) 0.00 0 00 0.00 0.00 #NIA #NIA No Flow (WS c inlet) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #NIA #NIA No Flow (WS c inlet) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #NIA #NIA No Flow (WS < inlet) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #NIA #NIA No Flow (WS c inlet) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 *NIA #NIA No Flow (WS c inlet) 0.00 0 00 0.00 0.00 #NIA #NIA No Flow (WS c inlet) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #NIA #NIA No Flow (WS < inlet) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #NIA #NIA No Flow (WS < inlet) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #NIA #NIA No Flow (WS c inlet) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #NIA #NIA No Flow (WS < inlet) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #NIA #NIA No Flow (WS < inlet) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #NIA #NIA No Flow (WS c inlet) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #NIA #NIA No Flow MS < inlet} 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #NIA #NIA No Flow (WS c inlet) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #NIA #NIA No Flow (WS c inlet) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #NIA #NIA No Flow (WS < inlet) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #NIA #NIA No Flow (WS < inlet) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #NIA #NIA No Flow (WS c inlet) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #NIA #NIA No Flow (INS c inlet) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #NIA #NIA No Flow (WS c inlet) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #NIA #NIA No Flow (WS c inlet) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #NIA #NIA No Flow (WS < inlet) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #NIA #NIA No Flow (WS c inlet) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #NIA #NIA No Flow (WS < inlet) 0.00 0 00 0.00 0.00 #NIA #NIA No Flow (WS c inlet) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #NIA #NIA No Flow (INS c inlet) udfcd spreadsheet.xls, Culvert 4/4/2019, 10:54 AM STAGE -DISCHARGE SIZING OF THE OUTLET CULVERT (INLET vs. OUTLET CONTROL WITH TAILWATER EFFECTS) Project: Ruiz Trucking, LLC Basin ID: Proposed Detention Pond r STAGE -DISCHARGE CURVE FOR THE FINAL OUTLET PIPE CULVERT 4991.00 4989.00 • 4987.00 4985.00 4983.00 4981.00 4979.00 4977.00 .„4-••#-41' _ 4975.00 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 Discharge (cfs) udfcd spreadsheet.xls, Culvert 4/4/2019, 10:54 AM STAGE -DISCHARGE SIZING OF THE SPILLWAY Project: Ruiz Trucking, LLC Basin ID: Proposed Detention Pond rigk iTrsR CAES Design Information (input): Bottom Length of Weir Angle of Side Slope Weir Elev. for Weir Crest Coef. for Rectangular Weir Coef. for Trapezoidal Weir Calculation of Spillway Capacity (output): L= Angle = EL. Crest = w= Ct= 13.00 75.96 4,988.80 3.00 3.00 Water Surface Elevation ft. (linked) Rect. Weir Flowrate cfs (output) Triangle Weir Flowrate cfs (output) Total Spillway Release cfs (output) Total Pond Release cis (output) 4987.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 #REF! 4987.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4987.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4988.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 4988.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 4988.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 4988.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.31 49€8.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.43 4989.00 3.49 0.21 3.70 5.25 4989.20 9.87 1.21 11.08 12.73 4989.40 18.13 3.35 21.47 23.22 4989.60 27.91 6.87 34.77 36.62 4989.80 39.00 12.00 51.00 52.93 #N/A #N/A # N/A #NIA #N/A #NIA #N/A # N/A #NIA # N/A #NIA #N/A # N/A #NIA # N/A #NIA #N/A 4N/A #NIA fiNI/A #NIA #NIA # N/A #NIA # N/A #I\l/A #N/A #N/A #NIA #N/A UN/A #N/A # N/A #N/A #N/A UN/A #N/A 4N/A 4N/A #N/A UN/A #N/A # N/A # N/A # N/A UN/A #N/A # N/A #N/A #N/A UN/A #N/A #NIA #N/A # N/A UN/A #N/A # N 1A #N/A #NIA UN/A #N/A # N/A #N/A #N/A #NIA #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A UN/A #N/A # N/A #NIA #N/A UN/A #N/A # N/A #N/A #N/A UN/A #N/A # N/A #N/A #N/A UN/A #N/A # N/A #N/A #N/A #NIA #N/A # NIA #NIA #N/A #NIA #N/A # N/A #N/A #N/A #1\i/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A UN/A #N/A #N/A #NIA #N/A #NIA #N/A # N/A #NIA # N/A UN/A #N/A # N/A #NIA 4N/A UN/A 4N/A # N/A #NIA # N/A UN/A #N/A # N/A #N/A # N/A UN/A #N/A # N/A #N/A 4 N/A #N/A #N/A # N/A 4N/A #N/A UN/A 4N/A # N/A #NIA #N/A #N/A 4N/A #N/A #NIA 4N/A UN/A 4N/A #N/A #N1A #N/A feet degrees feet udfcd spreadsheet.xls, Spillway 4/4/2019, 10:54 AM STAGE -DISCHARGE SIZING OF THE SPILLWAY Project: Ruiz Trucking, LLC Basin ID: Proposed Detention Pond I 0 4990.4206 _ 4989.9172 4989.4137 i 4988.9103 U) 4988.4069 4987.9034 STAGE -STORAGE -DISCHARGE CURVES FOR THE POND Storage (Acre -Feet) 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 4987.4 0 10 IOT L UI K*RGE r _ 30 40 50 20 Pond Discharge (cfs) s?lLLW Abe UIIiCHARGb KOHL'SSC44 Nit 60 I udfcd spreadsheet.xls, Spillway 4/4/2019, 10:54 AM Niatural IR.esolLirces Cons -'ration Shen/ice Trapezoidal Channel Section Participant: Location: County: Ruiz Trucking Fort Lupton County, Colorado Designer: Valene Date: 04/04/2019 Checker: Date: Hydraulics Formula, Version 2.2.1 Slope: 0.046 ft/ft 'n' value: 0.035 Proposed Swale Sideslope: 3:1 Bottom Width: 0 ft Depth of Flow: 0.5. ft. Width @ surface 3 ft Width @ surface 3 ft •5ir111.Vflr1 rr r1 r.• r1 rl.•"s° reV PS' AO r.+•r • n-_Ir.•r .ti 1 Depth iftl: „�.r.V.r.•r1r •rrr i•r1.-.Iow' r1r1r1r1rrr •.r.•r1r;.•r1,ryer .ti. ,r 10.5 I B ott''rn width IN: ): �I Hydraulic Radius: 0.24 Area: 0.75 sq ft Velocity: 3.49 ft/sec Capacity: 2.62 cfs Rock_Chute.xls for construction plan Upstream Channel Rock Chute Design - Cut/Paste Plan (Version WI -July -2010, Based on Design of Rock Chutes by Robinson, Rice, Kadavy, ASAE, 1998) Project: Ruiz Trucking, LLC Designer: AG P ROfessiona Is Date: 414/2019 County: Weld Checked by: Date: Design Values D50 dia. = 4.0 in. Rock, thickness = 8.0 i n . Inlet apron length = 10 ft. Outlet apron length = 5 ft. Radius = 11 ft. Will bedding be used? No Rock Gradation Envelope Passing D100 D85 D50 D10 Diameter, in. (weight, lbs.) 6-8(15-36) 5-7(10-26) 4-6 (5- 15) 3-5 (2- 10) Coefficient of Uniformity, (0 60)1(O 10) < 1.7 Quantities a Rock = 5 yd3 Geotextile (WCS-13)'' = 26 yd2 Bedding = 0 yd3 Excavation = 0 yd3 Earthfill = 0 yd3 Seeding = 0.0 acres Notes: a Rock, bedding, and geotextile quantities are determined from x -section below (neglect radius). 5 Geotextile Class I (Non -woven) shall be overlapped and anchored (18 -in. minimum along sides and 24 -in. minimum on the ends) --- quantity not included. C slope 0.046 ft./fit, Stakeout Notes Sta. 0+00.0 0+08.0 0+10.0 0+11.3 0+10.2 0+20.2 0+22.7 Notes: Elev. (PnO 4989 ft. (1) 4989 ft. (2) 4988.9 ft. (3) 4988.7 ft. (4) 4987.7 ft. (5) 4987.7 ft. (6) 4988.7 ft. (7) ----- 10 f. ---- Radius = 11.12-ft- Geotextile _ Inlet apron elev. = 4989 ft. 2 3 • Rock thickness = 8 in. i 5 ft. t 1 Point No. Description 2 Point of curvature (PC) 3 Point of intersection (PI) 4 Point of tangency (PT) Outlet apron elev. = 4987.7 ft 5 - 5 ft. -r, < Profile Alonci Centerline of Rock Chute Freeboard = 1 ft. Rock gradation envelope can be met with DOT Light riprap Gradation I' 1 3' 7 Downstream. Channel Slope = 0.006 ft./ft, a 2751 - d=1ft. - Rock Chute Bedding :Top width = 5 ft. 0.45 ft. f 1• • Berm Geotextile Rock Chute Bedding Rock thickness = 8 in. IT= 2.7 ft. *Use H throughout chute but not less than z2. Rock Chute Cross Section Profile, Cross Sections, and Quantities O.NRCS Nohrral Rescurces Censersaticn Seri United Shades DeparhnentcrAgriarlhrne Ruiz Trucking, LLC Weld County Designed Drawn Checked Dale AGPRCPessicoals Determination of Culvert Headwater and Outlet Protection Project: Ruiz Trucking, LLC Basin ID: Proposed Outlet Culvert h Pax _ IRcL_E Soil Type: rChoose One: Eb; Sandy C Non -Sandy Supercritical Flow! Using Da to calculate protection type. Design Information 'Input): Design Discharge Circular Culvert: Barrel Diameter in Inches Inlet Edge Type (Choose from pull -down list) Box Culvert: Barrel Height (Rise) in Feet Barrel Width (Sipan) in Feet Inlet Edge Type (Choose from pull -down list) Number of Barrels Inlet Elevation Outlet Elevation OR Slope Culvert Length Manning's Roughness Bend Loss Coefficient Exit Loss Coefficient Tailwater Surface Elevation Max Allowable Channel Velocity o=I iiieoved End with Headwil 12 Height (Rise) = Width (Span) = T OR I r No = Elev IN Elev OUT = L= n= kb ItK Elev Yi = V= 1 4987.4 4987.3 12 0.013 0 1 5 inches ft ft ft ft ft ft ftls Required Protection (Output): Tailwater Surface Height Flow Area at Max Channel Velocity Culvert CrossSectional Area Available Entrance Loss Coefficient Friction Loss Coefficient Sum of All Losses Coefficients Culvert Normal Depth Culvert Critical Depth Yet= At= A= kr= ks = Yn = Ye = 0.40 0.10 0.79 0.20 'I 0.37 1.57 0.26 0.29 Tailwater Depth for Design d 0.65 Adjusted Diameter OR Adjusted Rise Da = 0. Expansion Factor 1/(2*tan(O)) = 6.70 Flow/Diameter25 OR Flow/(Span * Rise `) OIDA`2.6 = 0.49 fefs Eroude Number Fr = 1.72 Supercritical! Tailwater/Adjusted Diameter OR Tailwater/Adjusted Rise YUD =1 0.63 ft ft2 fte ft ft ft Inlet Control Headwater Outlet Control Headwater Design Headwater Elevation Headwater/Diameter OR Headwater/Rise Ratio Minimum Theoretical Riprap Size Nominal Riprap Size UDFCD Riprap Type Length of Protection Width of Protection ft ft HWi,= 0.39 ft HWa = 0.55 HW = 4,987.95 ft HW/D= 0.55 d$o=p 0.5 dso=i 6 Type = VL L = 3 T= 2 in in ft ft Ruiz Trucking, LLC APPENDIX C 24 x 36 Maps I R I e I • I '' I - I I _ :i - - RUIZ TRUCKING IN TllE SW 1/4 OF SEC2O, T 1 N, R67W OF TI lE 6111 P.M... WELD CO INTY, CO . - : : c: rl -i.. • I7 1.11-G_HI tli_._ L-:'.1'='G:.I1: • j : .~_• :°.' . 6 ' y t H J ..-• _ m. I .... to 1 A :. b. r Ilir f OS al% 4- 110 OS Sift hi, I 001 010 P h P j10..IFIL: I I 0 =1'.11 7 N i \I I . J, f Di Tr S I ' 4 • IY1 -NIL Illie el . -ire. �%J 40P, 4 •% 1 ?1. ei li , .. sari :.r�•r :.1, i, { � ' SI a -y�l—''!':,/y 1 ' , • Trr. Olin 4.1.4%1P- N=1' F/:HAP." I ois 4%, •'allit VICINITY MAP I le or % \ ... N. -FY l' -'r it, isi-e- it), dit-it %._ad i•mit 0 5ti'•L_ 1 CO)c _ poi_ swap vi_s__... ri I _i6. , ___ _. 0 0 it los eie iJCC- * I FGFNf -1.I.,. ,,:a•.I..t= 4 a t. 'AT O ;- } rl'Fr i Ltrn 27I I i III $T.7.r 4.-FnrF rl -I4. N k L UOLIPLAHY A - 1. �I ) 10 I „-.,:. I- -ria I 0. NI 11:.%1 alit t .... I 0 1 lian 411111 OS S. IIIIIIIIIIIIII� IP 'Pee 4J ILIC fl I._. l 4 1 !_ 111 I! •9•il ;Lc; if It O ic tIS al t. li il O MIR — a ••• wa, .4b.rawIiit IIIIM 1 s 7'`� ii/ i' r tI 111 I? GENERAL DR LINAGE PLAN I_i ; ^l 1 n? I I. I 1 I I I .. 1 41 I, LL x-•. M r u f III 8.48 L. .. .. ^ C. J V ,•I irl • DEVELOPERS OF AURIC:U LI U RE fifth I\verij , SL.ile 2CO3 Girelpiy, CC 80624 (97(5u 535-931 B - fox: i{97O) 535-9b51 PLA: T.�.+ IASI Y [El SHFF-: D R.1 a I r^ 1 1 I - I - I I - — :I _ Cr RUITRUCKING — • .. — BETNICI PART OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 1, TOWNSHTP 1 NORTH. RANGE 67 WEST OF THE 6111 P.M., FT LUPTON, WELD COUNTY ,CO Nip 'err ea..I. ,:� ,,...,..„. ,,ze_ ',- �d = \...• S ••'fry 1•-: 1 • _ -••� ,,...,,•• .....,, ,.^:- __ • `';a '' d� ��Y� `, _--• _ --11 — (� •,Cr. x LEGEND \'r• 1 L I fit• L i-7 r'}�r f =X STN(' {.;F',.I'`,I?;;I..R=r'.r-- I 1 ti, ,n I te 7 �� ` 1y \t ♦� 'N _ 9. `t till 5. 1 ^,' .11-.`,. ' I I =; S -----`�i---- -.n, C. y w'. rL S' .'.JI r : ='1r• =RC,)PC. Frl `:RDI•!PJrI SURF QF ti \ •x��.,,— -,.--.�` ��: :C'`•TC•U(i/L.`L)--LC. TICK• -T �. —'- r S ( s t ���•r �,• c.PFrTv Rt•I.Nn: •. r II —. 1 4 _:: k\ • i �y ti �1 �� L''^r_rrrL n :A.r. 1, S/• —�� r----~1 "` �� . ��,..,.•yJ u'n .. ..- , -•_ { `- --r al i : LLL L'�I/• �" L.�,'TI I ALE �I I '_J''f ay.i n S1I V / •� a __` 4 a Al I S I • LL .•1 ' ' 1 - =X r 1: ., STN(' RAF:RV IIF FFNI .F 1 L l L ;,t. v' L L ` ii Le y•_. r' 1 I + j I '' 1 15, L: -I'••I.1 -•', • .. II : I. . _ .:• —X iI NG':rL AL _'`.CL , ••''—',_.•t•I 1 _ ' a.r,i=tr. et u„l,i tar s'• I J N ti 1 '� 1 III_ 11111, 11111111111111111 II 3 ` II Day i 1 "ti { i r`." II i _ ,T NC EDCE OF 14:''G -ti_ I I L 5 1 ' ' L: ^ e. -X S I N(= ( I -HI -I -A : I- EC I4: = ;Jot, e:<n•Ii I t -�:1, PIN -11 I'4:, S I ' r< I ti 1 �� L. w K I r"•l�'• �. -. — •,. ..1.`. ,•• '• ' ' � S `:. ; i k , �. • \ ; ' k L.6. II - ' (-0-' _X I NG -•; rAu—: -'.: _L '<` • ; Ii • g \. L• J y I it I II 1 •I'.; .;, • 1,* ,: ',�; S S > y�' 5' 2 9 i • _•••.•I , • I'<:• . ,V - `--)r.. f! '� '' :-f L •:FI-NII:YJN::i4:-rl•IC::1- 'I •''-�r'r; ._ � 0 = gT M1lt . :4F I M Wit: II�j A:J= r±r' i1 h•1(: 'LL IE�''i I I ' II - -I ..;•;•'.1l' I. r' ` ,•,C I•• • 1� ''\` I I :X ST NG sTr..,C:�Jt s •`, ' 1 fOl ! / J 11 ! 1•..' _ . . �r : 2 y ' - 1 —. _ jr ., y :1 Vii( L %r SI .-.n `: / ti 1 I.II , - f L 'I I I LI. , • .C' L I. •I - f}s El ---� c, T N1C. f f fFTF J�A M1I+{lE :7'1L1 fI.LE �II{y _ _ 1 , I i :. i, .y--• • .4 V I I L I I ` I I + ti di r, _ •a `r •. I • - 1 ii 3 + _ I I I ! •' I • SILT r=h,cr . - �.. -1.- -k:CCi. ;•:4':.-r:p=r. (• + 1• is 0 _ = ;;.ITI FT =RC;={:TI(]FJ / • 'I '•- I :+• .•, .,' • • .•, - • 5 L5 4 ; i.,.. �. , ; ti;• : '. - _.., .:5. : I ;: I I •: • h_I I ION UI LOVJ ANU SLOP_ / r'' ;.`.•.:" A. t. ! _I 'ce , .'. FIccnc.J_' TC.\ /I <•. .a•I I I :. i' r 'C 5 __ ,-i'•.' :.qa..r.'^ ..,,•. - .('' I --L•- .- _ _ n _ _ a 1 + . it •. ' ,. ' r — ••�--I�•�- . I,•1.'4 5 -- -_X C r r —is: • A -- I ^. , '.. 1 t Ai•'' 1. I. 1 i-\,.]�'-,. " :: , _ 1 -- DRAINAG E LEGEND •= •nl� _ - 1 J r.. �� f `.I:. : I:I LAC c•i: c•:s \\` ' L , — - ` .. s ' I , f 11 1 Fawi .I: I — I \ 1 11 l(----..• �i .gL--- f yiy D l: - JS I..'C.[ t ll I I -, '•t 1 ‘ \ 1 X l ti M1 \ L 1 iFl•. t^JriFPJTIFI=R n °'( ur r F h•I- r F;;Fs',}I I ti ��` - ' r - -- ` ', t 'l I- °Vt. •• r • t L-_.--\ - ,, .. c k 2.-: u•••?I:I•Ilr•Jl �' �—"--.- I F!'.K Fl " f+; ,T= `�F�; • I /is -4:1 I.I I I$'11. _ r •J r,IC+L f:C:f =; \ _ r ;• y, =AK. Fl t IO: R+'.TF (CF -Is? M DRAINAGE PLAN :: << ,..,..„_:,.„.„ I 1. 1 I I I I •• I II x N. 72. " -r III 1" 81.8 .. •. _- L. ^ . F. V n , • r _ •. • ' If — •• T`I '5I DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE ir c: i -L I:+ • ti17 O N Pe SHFF-: DR -2 • I It I I I I I I - Sill. Fence(SF) SC". -1 EC -S Temporary Outlet Protection (TOP) — } — n - — - - -,•. Il Lr_e_r� rr t -- ` v ��} I t'q' I-br�`NHT"IIilr 0:?IFR: 51 F'=+1't a -cr- rr^rr-t, f �'� - UL ERI ]R !d'W.1.L H *'.EL i L 4•- F='7•, BNC;F:_a 14. LE;9 I f •G' `•..,_ 1 rnt PC -5- At- ti IM'S a, e.1y;'aC Er* +;- I _r tillx:ttir t _ .laid.•- '. t r w, 'i 7y �,. .. IS. wit- • I. moo .fr:I:Ir... int. 0.1"rt.VPr LY.FRM.. artavcw u;Z t • Q tY• J'Jt' 3. iW 'En 'F kUil x}. i'A ti jL IWl. rtlt n. 1 I •� /- V.•-f..I4r _t3tf'k' eF:J::.. r. i e5d 1s�'t fen .t • "• � (( � �-_ i r r . I I I . I -�11 •i.gri —.-... ti i6' Ai' : . Fr lek r• �—' — + — ,' T:VIPORARY �, r ti . a� �' �•JTLr1I=;`T3D_ CaUTLEY PIRGTECTIt.N PL.•+ts• L u� �r,:rrY-FyI,I -Fr?fI r. `-' r• CIVIC / CFpU90 -" S J ruvarm :I: 3CC Lr d'J I'•.TC D lCr'J C•J.a I: 7r111 rt•'. 14� I .+ - TJ• erpr .. IT c: Du -it -4:11 P.i:. FE :IiIJ:: LUl -Fla. Cdl:.•Slu 1iIF6 -r. + Daft. _t`:X. RO;1' -;44 II :dl ::i I—', r!F I-Fhi= I I, 'JI .,- 1µq ul. dfAl I:1 11•LL OW OYETiFL-0NJ STEM WAIL -c-.r - _ _ y •f . AI LL? I. r 17• Ea1�E}GEJ4'c•" =PILLw,.' PF•a` i, , i IF f- P _f�,- NM ..- CF 1 -1+4'�roll-u i WAN r.I'I_r 1: ..r=[I�rl .it iitF : ,ri tliit :E = L P•r: .y I6' Z r J9n ;AM our DM UR:H - 'i' 1 ' 1 r. + �ETICN �. I I r c• ra-`6?IL• 1T" 98 YT• — t,. �.�� _ ,'y IH•i'I •.I,' . • 1 — :PC• G :uuICD . =' ;rtj+,..r r: . -.- rC. ti� iv-.: .',. :,l• fir l.t .•..7: r.. • %V �i i` ' yrw •; PI &IV:.4' TB_E 4r . 1QJr-0F:,=i 4_rJ:r nor -L rot .`• 1 I'' I. P- 1C ICE '20 T VT ICI 2/+_5 SchAS T66_E - 1 1 J: N +� x: :yrat IF ai.:I I I:rI.., ',RIBF at>F.-.i, FIPFFR 'F3 :Pset ::_i 1:: 1:I t., •� t+.iurFt:. i**:r•vllr-' image M1, IE.vrT•. III k dul EMERGENCY SPILL'r5't;Y SECTION At SP LL'' Y CHANNEL .-_/__, �-s: t C. kre:thcs5 . ._ht' -M) W;r.tt EL• O'i l: - � 4 r f • i _ --b'ATIU`V (I I) '•J''if1T I jev) D•.II S ,,I 5 l PCSI? S 4 R' A7HEC rE Er sv. lis rarairl DM. + TitC"ttiECS 3F tEATECtE -i•t- • :, '0 e :I:"I !':: Id I IBC: II. C“4ECTCN ?1C0Y'i M•6 CF7vCH *.E4 Ko.itS:iJAIE[ 11 - I? I= •S 6 14-:I THE OAt. Il' SF�71f;1a u t: 0 f. -: sr i SPILLWAY DETAIL 10 OLJTLET PIPE / CLJTOFF COLLAR DETAIL Sr -1. siv.T FF\CF : a P• A et ?n L n Ii . IJIs;i IC,7rC:-I:` ..r I' -i `1-Irc.4 -- .i. o'-1. r='AjO;IARY CU !LEI PF rC1E2tIOF4 nrueir'bei 'n1D 'lbkalinlahnu-Jt _fiaStil2J?l3L1HFanima are Flo II41CItII'II:lnu' ;pi SF a TOP-'_ 7it•a. Druggc min:cod Ctava:IDinict Nosemt r211C' blunt volume th 1f&tr. ShrmDM: n, pr.Cr'Feria Munn: 4nt.Trr1 crtr:D 'no CCU- c ::T[ it I '• .--2:,,,t S/l II III''31 iI I' _ In I:rd. c:1":4.H'-::L 1.wS. ti- Si --I I:HI-I..F-.Au- ?-.ii-4_KCT _ `. `. _ I 7 II I I I :.W'.V`,F -' NM- :II. %:W::hF - 3_-?I[=l! r71: ]� 3• .I L:' ea 1 lr.fr^-i eR A� 1z.:'r=- l}= le O:. l9w- L r. .1 :a r1 - (4499 _• - ' S14fa.i"4 rat 090",L+OM 41x4 b.1•a 9fl1Ma'sutural f'b-.n. r.n.ntwr oti;'7 s.N: h _ , A•1 AM 8141[-i.IT we rim 1114 Mt WtltWtrt'. ylNt 1 l r t�v :Ivnrxl '6lknapnnldlx• = •ih4iR. R;I�nI• ptr.a•inflan 4 ;am T.]Pii-II--_-A IEk;J a :\ hap -Deatitm -M'..4 Rvu --kI ur....s 41n. . Far: at nrarsuisrliPlI 'int - .::III --IP-It.': --!?' t: ••. 4 Far: at taJU.. y/P-; • .. r''4r3:'-,_=lit -9'.5:C: ZS _Ivor:.-r-.::rr sttkAoiAIW7f -I I.-4 -.I. I; •AI:i CA'..-- IL`.F ro...•.:i i.::. v h1 N i:LCP: xn ei.r virtu s1 -Er - ft•rt ••.cn[L 0-tV.,0 7aaott f'► fittililn, - „ sa{Y , cV:tty:In7I u-„ l: Aran IP ra. r -e a AAP? 7 a- I Jcvrnaisarn - $--"at :I1: I!'bnr+tt 4='';TI{)FJ T-ril•JI IC.H 5-11.JG ..1F --C:•. Ii i;.' -I'I I tr..11 -.`.I 19 '•.I I '111 ffri I:`.1 -1 All :LJ :'t:N:`,I;I P -g.0 4SARph !7I ' 5 .L' 'I' II• :3.:ZIN::IIFII' I'' ‘14:: C:1. {!-•JIF • d -I Pa iidY7h ray ' '•� t Sks.-' ''t ma. u -s.'+ 159.'(R!St r , l '-,S. j`iO _gel'mei*. IiJrr[ 1 r 5n r. �- C. rlr.•I•j•., r.'Tn•�:IIl�'KC: P -Z 2 Idd7.Tfl (Ay CF II • - �'::.`ae:3>-.•C. - nn '- -- nfl •r -•I.,' I: - I fl c••..If-I;J— •I=IFr:f:I.fs,-ru:I it•RI-„ n.w,7 4162: r r71' t.•r::FNIF�: R'C—...'.JI r•-?r.^::I r....r.i..ri IT i••L'-^....L-.1`1.1--,::::l.ALLEC:!JI•.-=1F.-^:TC=L?•.:I5E.--:-..1.....ILC♦ralUaAlornaVciIc,1lrloalRea Chute PiotG`utr 37`-r',rrC-C2;3?'ter€CI - %•t3Cfr.i5PJFH-nIIVII •:-II1:SI:It' iII' -I- II,- CI- -IFli:I.It. I-Li-(Ah1lireilissa .• -rr. '±:I i4I- ebb-Imo[:Y.S IF:;I' IIH:: Ar.:I. .PI: Ca;l-IjFFa'p-IA i-= „I: k.If4;LIP FIMJ 111-k:} -I' J. C r'.rN_:az:STLC- F'.'J+1'frG :f I' -Nil _ lc%%L' i ' :r;' U:Li Irl l;- a: -'n J: IAk3_= : v^J.-hL' tw. I TAN C f!t•�Li=t•7rPJJ�_I I _�-'aF+ndUl- g k D - -C:I-ICJ �'I' rfat J5C 17 ii1`. I :r•3�'.:{Y11r._:'•.•lr rJ_[C'C C[I:J J� _[.-C'`..i-'ti _rl`._S I L '.' !. Cw+IIIxaIw :IFF-FF',I C:P-w:-.---•:fvi:ki$r: -'-d•t c:'-•r"..IF.i. .- - ...ri r , • rr:•[rLc ,e - .r9:I r cKs. r rs5cvc - I rt , e ..<. z... �_ -. - -•-�" "li CI -I:.1I ?`y ;:1: c .-LLWPI.5 -- I.: --Fa SI11I 'TIN -.SE: / r - f•I I II- .:. I H,.";;; ii Pit I!F tCtir. -I:. .I:,r-C?Ic I A II F:1: ?, -H I r•HI rJ'-:.•.IJ-I-i:•:u}-I:-''frlu II',;i-il 1 z ; r yOdnf .5t. .. :}:;k•1. - :ii C. r•F'IF aii:2I•T.�I'4•I-.• Lti_ 'a a r 2 T•'•.^• Ir'r-.^.IC ,-:I L^J.J_GC;t ."II•-2hCITC L ell.' -1•I I.. ,:r• ^Tc:L ^TC:L7o1.:• I Ile.;:ri,aI i•LLEC CrL'F '�iL---- R°°I s...' Bnt ha :.l'Jlr'F 13'.II: L'LC--1- H:5 -I :.?• I -- 7.W El: .5F -H:,1 ':A4leltI; '• - I• f] t r• - f• `:,•• L.•-�.I( • 4w F, UI a...l uul•.hat. Tr-.,Irr.�K-J_IL1LL'[GL'' r,_rJL In:.-I_]::�J::L[IC[rar'IJ-LrJJ cr_N l.. i._-r '� butll?.ten,runc; Ihi; rll<_:�>._c <L: f-L:II';fl,-II. IFATIr11-.211-aCT-Ir:'.fr—:IP- ,:k dolts craw~sa+: w t f FJFLI is ylt:L:n•.-WLL r .4:+22Irns.:r-C'.T=3 y fs I .••};:I:11 Rnr K u HUTE DETAIL 'V'.rF-IL.c.1 + hi :Pr! I r- `tr3 _c',,c,:IL I I .Ii -I;: _. ' OUTLET STRUCTURE TAB _E ....c: r cr:c:35 rcc cr tC''.1C :S y -F f.HIF::i- i'- F. .111 -IPA Ili; '.g.',:- F:-I,I.I". ' I-1 I I: ;'1:1 1 ':c LL-.: W:r.::•r1 FFiF. k - :l- -fi :... .7.1.1',1;U- 5.7.11cn••.-:.., :Cl.,{: - -,r-F w SEC IC'NJ•. 9VII %Il.L' i3lIs :. I:::; rr I WA--el:I, -::.Ire:-.4IF--.: E_E• I- •d C. TYPICAL OUTLET STRUCTURE WITH 3 ORIFICE PLATE & TRASH RACK DETAIL RECTANGULAR ORIFICE DETAIL NIS F-, li.: I I. I I I I I .. I t in il IL X M C is w -.I- L. tli in .5 r: _ ^ ..-.. f. u .'I - l la Is u PRI PERS C ;i.iie 20.0, Ifi -fax: i{ 4- 1.' 4f - ff I - I:, . Ri L. SH F F—: DR -3 GPROfessionals DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE Introduction Nuisance and Waste Management Plan Use By Special Review (USR) Ruiz Trucking, LLC and Gloria Karina Ruiz The Ruiz Trucking, LLC facility will allow up to ten semi -trucks to be parked on an approximately 2.4 -acre site. The semi -trucks will be used to haul water for oil and gas support or other hauling as market conditions allow. There is an existing manufactured home which will be used as an office. A 4,800 SF garage is proposed to allow the storage of trucks indoors. Parking is proposed to the south and east of the existing residence on improved gravel surfaces. Additional on -site parking will be available for employees. Two to ten full-time employees are proposed including on -site employees and drivers. Drivers will be on -site for less than two hours at a time. No painting, vehicle maintenance, or manufacturing is proposed. No regulated air emissions are anticipated from this site. There will be up to 500 gallons of on -site fuel storage with appropriate containment. Parking at the facility will occur 24 -hours a day, 7 -days a week. The primary hours of operation are 5:00 A.M. to 8:00 P.M., 7 -days a week. The uses adjacent to the site are listed below: West of the site: Ramirez Trucking & Oilfield Services, Inc., SPR12-0005 2-0005 South of the site: T C Woods, LORI' 1-0001 — Sawmill, Furniture, Lumber East of the site: SUP 24 — Kennel & USR 671 — Farm Equipment Repair North of the site: Highway 52 Other uses in the surrounding area include construction companies, trucking companies, outdoor storage facilities, kennels, commercial greenhouses, oil and gas production sites and gas plants, gravel mining and various agricultural uses. Ruiz Trucking LLC will use the methods described below to minimize potential nuisances and waste produced as a result of the proposed uses. Noise The property owner or operator will attempt to minimize noise generated during operation and maintain compliance with Weld County Noise Requirements. The facility will adhere to the maximum permissible noise levels allowed in the commercial Zone District. The existing vegetation and surrounding fencing will provide sound absorption and screening. ENGINEERING, PLANNING, CONSULTING & REAL ESTATE 3050 67th Avenue, Suite 200 ❑ Greeley, CO 80634 970.535.9318 /office O 970.535.9854 /fax ❑ www.agpros.corn Page 2 of 2 Light Outdoor lighting is wall -mounted. Light poles are not proposed. Sources of light will be shielded so that light rays will not shine directly onto adjacent properties where such would cause a nuisance or interfere with the use on the adjacent properties. Neither the direct, nor reflected, light from any light source will create a traffic hazard to operators of motor vehicles on public or private streets. No colored light will be used which may be confused with, or construed as, traffic control devices. Waste Management The property owner or operator will be responsible for controlling noxious weeds on the site. Trash will be collected in a covered, confined trash dumpster m pster and removed at least weekly by a trash removal company. Employees may use the restroom located in the manufactured home which has an existing septic system, permit no. SP -0701131. In the future, a septic system may be installed in the proposed garage for employee use. There will be up to 500 gallons of on -site fuel storage with appropriate containment. Dust Abatement The operation is not expected to generate disproportionate amounts of fugitive dust. Lot surfaces will be rangeland grass with improved gravel surfaces in roadways, parking and operations areas. There are existing landscaping improvements around the residence, vegetative screening to the east and fencing surrounding the subject property. Parking is internal to the site. The existing access to this property is located on WCR 23 approximately 265 -feet south of HWY 52. This access road is shared by the Ruiz property and two adjacent properties and there is an existing easement. WCR 23 is a paved collector roadway and HWY 52 is a paved state highway. Semi -trucks will not gain significant speed before the access road intersects with WCR 23 due to the distance from the property to WCR 23. Watering of surfaces will occur as necessary to suppress dust. Hello