The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20172875.tiffaMmon; ca -t+ o is Chloe Rempel From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Hello and good morning, Kim Ogle Friday, November 15, 2019 5:51 AM Selena Baltierra; Jessica Reid Esther Gesick; Chloe Rempel FW: Mewbourn neighbor outreach for review Mew Storyboard 11-19-19_edited.pptx Please add this draft presentation to the case file for DCP Mewbourn, case number 5MJUSR17-83-542 This office has also asked to be copied on minutes and persons in attendance. This information should be forthcoming next week. Thank you Kim Ogle Principal Planner Weld County Planning Services From: Kim Ogle Sent: Friday, November 15, 2019 5:48 AM To: Borders, Shannon <SBorders@dcpmidstream.com> Subject: RE: Mewbourn neighbor outreach for review Hello and good morning, Thank you for providing Weld County Planning with a copy of the community correspondence. Weld Planning will arrange to have the document added to the electronic case file. Please provide minutes of the November 19 meeting addressing the interactions from the presentation with the responses and concerns of the neighbors. Also, please identify who was in attendance. Thank you Kim Ogle Principal Planner Weld County Planning Services 1555 North 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 970.400.6100 Office 970.400.3549 Direct kosle@weldgov.com Confidentiality Notice: This electronic transmission and any attached documents or other writings are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify sender by return e-mail and destroy the communication. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or cc.:pL(Ko) I1 (1St 11 oon-ae-TS PLOHt9.3 the taking of any action concerning the contents of this communication or any attachments by anyone other than the named recipient is strictly prohibited. From: Borders, Shannon <SBorders@dcpmidstream.com> Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2019 12:54 PM To: Kim Ogle <kogle@weldgov.com> Subject: Mewbourn neighbor outreach for review f Caution: This email originated from outside of Weld County Government. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Kim, I'm planning to send the following email below to the Mewbourn neighbors by noon tomorrow. Paul told me you'd like to review this communication prior to me sending it out. Please let me know if you have edits as soon as possible. We're also presenting the attached information during the meeting, and following the meeting we will post this information on our Facebook group page in case folks were not able to join us. Thanks, Shannon Dear Neighbors, Next week, we will be updating you on three primary issues including the fence repairs, an overview of the sound study featuring the results of this evaluation and an outline of the tree buying program. If you have a receipt to turn in for the purchase of trees, please bring it. I will have the W-9 forms, so we can reimburse you. As a reminder, please plan to join us at The Meadows Event Center at 6 p.m. on Tuesday, Nov. 19. Regards, Shannon Borders Community Outreach Manager DCP Midstream cell 970.652.0397 sborders@dcomidstream.com cicp Midstream 2 Sound Study Overview • DCP commissioned a sound study in August 2019 as a result of noise complaints. The study was performed by Wave Engineering. Six locations, shown in the figure to the right, were monitored during a week-long continuous sound study. Locations 1-4 are identical to where measurements recorded in June 2017 and October 2017. • Locations 5 & 6 are new. Ctp Midstream. Sound Study Result S • Table 1: Daily average sound levels from August to September 2019 8/25/2019 8/26/2019 8/27/2019 Date 8/28/2019 8/29/2019 8/30/2019 8/31/2019 9/1/2019 9/2019 dcp Midstream Location L_�eq (dBA) Location Average . 1 50 51 51 52 52 51 52 52 51 2 61 61 60 60 60 59 59 61 60 3 46 54 55 51 53 54 54 45 53 4 48 52 52 53 54 54 54 52 53 5 63 64 65 66 66 64 64 64 64 6 42 49 50 49 50 52 51 48 49 • Table 2: Comparison of Daily Average sound levels, 2017 vs. 2019 Location Oct 2017 Aug Average 2019 Jun 2017 Average Average 1 18 56 51 2 6.1 65 60 3 57 50 53 4 62 52 93 5 6 -- -- 64 -- =, ••• 49 2019 sounds levels at some locations are lower than in 2017, and slightly higher at other locations, but still within the sound standard of 65 dBA 2017 sound levels were measured before Mewbourn 3 was constructed and in operation Locations 2 and 5 are immediately adjacent to county roads, so some road noise is included Fence Repair St OP MS Weld County has requested the removal of the chain link fence containing the damaged slats and suggested replacing it with a more decorative fence. DCP is planning to install metal fence panels as shown in the image to the right. Weld County has approved this option. DCP is working with engineers to ensure this fence can withstand a wind event. Once the fence is installed, landscaping in front of the fence will be replaced as needed. CICp Midstream. Tree Purchasing Program DCP will reimburse neighbors up to $1,000 for the purchase of trees. The program is available to neighbors who reside within one mile of the Mewbourn Plant (18295 County Road 35, Platteville, CO). Reimbursements require the submission of a receipt and W-9 to Shannon Borders (sborders@dcpmidstream.com) by June 30, 2020. This is a one-time program and no further payments are authorized. • Transportation to acquire the trees, planting the trees and maintaining the trees is the responsibility of the requestor. DCP will not replace trees that do not survive. ICICF3 Mids beam Chloe Rempel From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Kim Ogle Friday, March 15, 2019 6:02 AM James Taloumis; Lauren Light; Evan Pinkham; Dawn Anderson; Hayley Balzano; Mike McRoberts Tom Parko Jr.; Esther Gesick; Selena Baltierra; Chloe Rempel; Jessica Reid FW: DCP Planned Maintenance FYI Mewbourn maintenance, for the record. Thank you Kim Ogle Planning Services kogie@weldgov.com From: Borders, Shannon <SBorders@dcpmidstream.com> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2019 11:17 AM To: WCRCC <WCRCC@co.weld.co.us>; Alan Caldwell <acaldwell@weldgov.com>; sherman@co.weld.co.us; Mike Wallace <mrwallace@weldgov.com>; James Taloumis <jtaloumis@weldgov.com>; Kim Ogle <kogle@weldgov.com>; cdphe.information@state.co.us; ddurkee@pgfpd.org; Kevin Halloran <khalloran@weldgov.com>; Joshua Noonan <jnoonan@weldgov.com> Subject: DCP Planned Maintenance Caution: This email originated from outside of Weld County Government. Do not click links or open attachments unless you sender and know the content is safe. recognize the Beginning March 18 through March 22, DCP Midstream will be performing maintenance on the Mewbourn Plant located at 18295 WCR 35, Platteville. During this timeframe, construction activities will require increased truck traffic, intermittent flaring, and additional noise associated with these activities. Night maintenance will be kept to a minimum. We have notified our neighbors within one-half mile of the facility. We are reaching out to you in case you receive calls from the public. Please refer inquiries to myself if further information is required. Thank you for your assistance, and I'm available to answer your questions as well. Regards, Shannon Borders Community Outreach Manager DCP Midstream cell 970.652.0397 sborders@dcpmidstream.com C Midstream aOrnrnonicad+ionS 3/251(9 cc: PL( (sO FTP) PWt£PIOmii-t6/mm) 03/15/(9 QoI1-ag7s PL0493 dip Midstream. Mewbourn 2 and 3 — Light Mitigation Plan Weld County, Colorado USR Permit No. 5MJUSR17-83-542 September 26, 2017 O---iZmrounica+ions ICS/a5lr7 aor 7 - ag75 PL. c c 3 Light Mitigation Plan As directed by the Weld County Board of Commissioners (the "Board") in the conditions to the amended Mewbourn USR permit, DCP has developed a light mitigation plan designed to minimize light emissions from the facility at night, while providing the operations team with a safe working environment. First, as directed by the Board in the development standards applicable to the amended Mewbourn USR permit, DCP will restrict construction and routine maintenance to daytime hours so that the need for night-time lighting can be minimized. However, because the facility operates on a 24 -hour, seven days a week basis, night-time lighting is necessary. DCP will also implement changes to its night-time lighting at the existing plant, and will incorporate similar lighting approaches in the new facilities, intended to minimize the light impacts of the facility on the surrounding area. At the existing facility, DCP will turn all lights off at night with exception of walkway lighting under the pipe rack. The walkway lights are critical for the operations team to safely travel around the site at night. The remaining lights will be put on switches so the operations team will have the ability to turn on the appropriate lights needed to work on equipment at night. Once the work is complete, the lights will then be turned off. Additionally, the operations team will reduce scheduled night-time flaring by adjusting the timing of planned maintenance events to occur later in the day. Where possible, lights will be downcast. The future facility will follow a similar plan. The only lights to remain on at night in the new facility are the walkway lights. This will allow the operations team to safely travel around the site at night. The remaining lights will be put on switches so that operators have the ability to turn on the appropriate lights when working on equipment at night. Again, the operations team will reduce night time scheduled flaring by adjusting the planned maintenance to occur later in the day. Lights will be downcast to the extent possible. dcp Midstream. Mewbourn 2 and 3 — Sound Mitigation Plan Weld County, Colorado USR Permit No. 5MJUSR17-83-542 September 26, 2017 Sound Mitigation Plan DCP Midstream is committed to minimizing sound impacts from current and future operations. In the development standards for the amended Mewbourn Gas Plant USR, the Weld County Board of Commissioners imposed a 65 dBA sound limit on the facility, to be measured at the property boundaries. This represents a reduction in the permissible sound levels from the industrial standard (80 dBA Day, 75 dBA night) previously applicable to this facility. DCP has developed a sound mitigation plan, as described below, that will achieve such sound standards through a combination of equipment changes and engineering measures. At the existing Mewbourn facility, DCP will fully enclose the residue compressor building, shut down three compressors driven by natural gas engines, and insulate the inlet slug catcher V- 0151 and associated piping. Within the new portions of the facility, the residue compressor and gas turbine buildings will be fully enclosed. Piping outside of the residue compressor building that emits excessive sound will be insulated to minimize impacts from that area. The stabilizer overhead compressor, spanker compressor, and instrument air compressor also will be fully enclosed in a building and all of these compressors will be electrically driven. dcp Midstream, Mewbourn 2 and 3 — Construction Traffic Mitigation Plan Weld County, Colorado USR Permit No. 5MJUSR17-83-542 September 26, 2017 Traffic Mitigation Plan During Construction As directed by the Weld County Board of Commissioners in the conditions to the amended Mewbourn USR permit, DCP has developed a plan to mitigate the impact of construction traffic on the surrounding community. DCP has instructed all construction -related contractors to follow the same traffic pattern to travel to and from the construction site. To arrive, all construction vehicles must come from Highway 85, turn east onto County Road 32, turn north onto County Road 35, and then west onto County Road 38. A reverse route must be used to leave the Mewbourn site. In addition, water trucks will be used to mitigate dust on County Road 32 generated by construction traffic to and from the work site. Please see a map of the traffic pattern below, which is currently being implemented during preliminary site work. dcp Midstream. Mewbourn 2 and 3 — Community Participation Plan Weld County, Colorado USR Permit No. 5MJUSR17-83-542 September 26, 2017 DCP is committed to developing and sustaining a Community Participation Plan that facilitates effective stakeholder communications and public information regarding the existing operations of its Mewbourn facility and its Mewbourn 3 expansion. The following described the objectives and activities that comprise DCP's Plan. Objectives DCP has identified three objectives integral to an effective community participation plan: Build and Maintain Relationships. DCP will identify and maintain a list of key stakeholder contacts to ensure inclusion and proactive outreach, and to provide a pathway for questions and concerns. Educate Stakeholders. Through regular outreach, DCP will strive to educate stakeholders about operating procedures, emergency preparedness, community benefits, and industry awareness. Provide Openness. DCP will identify various avenues through which the local community can access relevant information, and can provide comments and feedback. DCP understands that trust is founded upon strong, open and accessible relationships. Communications Activities The following activities will help DCP meet its objectives as stated above: to build relationships, educate stakeholders and provide openness about Mewbourn activities and issues. This three-part approach addresses our local community's need for information regarding our ongoing operations, and updates related to the construction of our Mewbourn 3 expansion. Neighbor Response Line: 970-378-6399 DCP has established a dedicated neighbor response line that will route during office hours to an assigned employee, with multiple forwarding options to ensure prompt response. After normal hours, voice mails left on the response line will automatically generate an email that will be directed to multiple management level personnel. Emergency calls should continue to be directed to 911. Community Town Halls: DCP has identified a schedule of town hall meetings, extending through the construction period into 2018. Town halls will be held quarterly and local stakeholder input will be sought into the effectiveness of the format. Topics of discussion may include construction updates, emergency preparedness, responding to questions and concerns about plant operations, and social opportunities to build and maintain relationships. Scheduled Town Hall Meetings: August 16, 2017 November 14, 2017 February 20, 2018 May 8, 2018 August 14, 2018 November 13, 2018 Electronic/Mobile Access DCP has implemented a social media collaboration tool through Facebook, which allows interested neighbors to subscribe for updates and to provide feedback. This approach provides the additional benefit of mobile access to ensure openness and responsiveness. Postings may include topics such as operational planned updates, construction routes, unplanned activities, schedule reminders and input regarding town hall meetings, and question and answers. DCP's Facebook site is called the DCP Midstream Mewbourn Community, and the website address is: https://www.facebook.com/groups/1783797418578056/ wog wie /0 o t-ct c cxY7/27(_<_.,,z,c7zy rU 7// l O ET_ U WASHINGTON D.C. 20426 ic p0.......r - M a 1-> % e ox, 4 % • O C" S U. 91 a 7/V7 Docket No.: co i- ts Lo - O O �X� ▪ � - O cC O CU ^^• >, . U O0 N 2 cc T a. Gam: PLC co), I-«Ce,F) 9/ 7 07oV1-as 7s Pc-ot,q3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA A FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION MI IO DCP Operating Company, LP Docket No. CP17-481-000 NOTICE OF INTENT TO PREPARE AN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED MEWBOURN 3 RESIDUE EAST PIPELINE, AND REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ON ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES (September 6, 2017) The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) will prepare an environmental assessment (EA) that will discuss the environmental impacts of the Mewbourn 3 Residue East Pipeline involving construction and operation of facilities by DCP Operating Company, LP (DCP) in Weld County, Colorado. The Commission will use this EA in its decision -making process to determine whether the project is in the public convenience and necessity. This notice announces the opening of the scoping process the Commission will use to gather input from the public and interested agencies on the project. You can make a difference by providing us with your specific comments or concerns about the project Your comments should focus on the potential environmental effects, reasonable alternatives, and measures to avoid or lessen environmental impacts. Your input will help the Commission staff determine what issues they need to evaluate in the E. To ensure that your comments are timely and properly recorded, please send your comments so that the Commission receives them in Washington, DC on or before October 6, 2017. If you sent comments on this project to the Commission before the opening of this docket on August 2, 2017, you will need to file those comments in Docket No. P 17- 4 1-000 to ensure they are considered as part of this proceeding, This notice is being sent to the Commission's current environmental mailing list for this project, State and local government representatives should notify their constituents of this proposed project and encourage them to comment on their areas of concern. Docket No. CP17-481-000 - 2 If you are a landowner receiving this notice, a pipeline company representative may contact you about the acquisition of an easement to construct, operate, and maintain the proposed facilities. The company would seek to negotiate a mutually acceptable agreement. However, if the Commission approves the project, that approval conveys with it the right of eminent domain. Therefore, if easement negotiations fail to produce an agreement, the pipeline company could initiate condemnation proceedings where compensation would be determined in accordance with state law. DP provided landowners with a fact sheet prepared by the FERC entitled "An Interstate Natural Gas Facility On My Land? What Do I Need To Know?" ?" This fact sheet addresses a number of typically asked questions, including the use of eminent domain and how to participate in theCommission's proceedings. It is also available for viewing on the FERC website Nww. ferc.gov). :Public Participation For your convenience, there are three methods you can use to submit your comments to the Commission. The Commission encourages electronic filing of comments and has expert staff available to assist you at (202) 502-8258 or FercOnlineSupport@ferc.gov. Please carefully follow these instructions so that your comments are properly recorded. 1) You can file your comments electronically using the eCoi m,cnl feature on the Commission's website (www.fcrc.gov) under the link to Documents a n l Filings. This is an easy method for submitting brief, text -only comments on a project; 2) You can file your comments electronically by using the eFiling feature on the Commission's web site (www. fe rc . ov) under the link to Documents and Filings. With eFiling, you can provide comments in a variety of formats by attaching them as a file with your submission. New eFiling users must first create an account by clicking on "c cgister." If you are filing a comment on a particular project, please select "Comment on a Filing" as the filing type; or 3) You can file a paper copy of your comments by mailing them to the following address. Be sure to reference the project docket number (CP17- 481-000) with your submission: ICmberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street NE, Room 1 A Washington, DC 20426 Docket No. CP17-481-000 - . Summary of the Proposed Prot DCP proposes to construct and operate 8.4 miles of new 20 -inch -diameter pipeline in Weld County, Colorado. The I ewbourn 3 Residue East Pipeline Project would provide about 253,000 dekatherms of natural gas per day to an interconnect with Colorado Interstate Gas Company L1 FL. C.'s High Plains System. According to DCP, its project would transport natural gas from DCP's s Iewbourne Processing Plant Complex to support further transportation and market needs in Colorado and other states in the region. The Mewbourn. 3 Residue East Pipeline Project would consist of the following facilities: • 8.4 miles of new 20 -inch -diameter pipeline; and pig launcher and receiver assembly,' cathodic protection rectifier unit, three mainline valves, and a metering station. The general location of the project facilities is shown in appendix 1.2 Land Requirements for Construction Construction of the proposed facilities would disturb about 87.4 acres of land for the aboveground facilities and the pipeline. Following construction, DCP would maintain about 32.3 acres for permanent operation of the project's facilities; the remaining acreage would be restored and revert to former uses. The EA Process The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires the Commission to take into account the environmental impacts that could result from an action whenever it considers the issuance of a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity. NEPA also 1 "pig" is a tool that the pipeline company inserts into and pushes through the pipeline for cleaning the pipeline, conducting internal inspections, or other purposes. 2 The appendices referenced in this notice will not appear in the Federal Register. Copies of appendices were sent to all those receiving this notice in the mail and are available at www.ferc.gov using the link called "eLibrary" or from the Commission's Public Reference Room, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426, or call (202) 502- 8371. For instructions on connecting to eLibrary, refer to the last page of this notice. Docket No. CP17-481-000 17-481-000 - 4 a requires us3 to discover and address concerns the public may have about proposals. This process is referred to as "scoping." The main goal of' the scoping process is to focus the analysis in the EA. on the important environmental issues. By this notice, the Commission requests public comments on the scope of the issues to address in the EA. We will consider all filed comments during the preparation of the EA. In the EA we will discuss impacts that could occur as a result of ` the construction and operation of the proposed project under these general headings: geology and soils; • land use; • water resources, fisheries, and wetlands; • cultural resources; • vegetation and wildlife; • air quality and noise; • endangered and threatened species; • public safety; and is cumulative impacts We will also evaluate reasonable alternatives to the proposed project or portions of the project, and make recommendations on how to lessen or avoid impacts on the various resource areas. The EA will present our independent analysis of the issues. The EA. will be available in the public record through eLibrary. Depending an the comments received during the scoping process, we may also publish and distribute the E.A. to the public for an allotted comment period. We will consider all comments on the EA before making our recommendations to the Commission. To ensure we have the opportunity to consider and address your comments, please carefully follow the instructions in the Public Participation section, beginning on page 2. With this notice, we are asking agencies with jurisdiction by law and/or special expertise with respect to the environmental issues of this project to formally cooperate with us in the preparation of the EA. 4 Agencies that would like to request cooperating agency status should follow the instructions for filing comments provided under the Public Participation section of this notice. 3 "We," ',us," and "our" refer to the environmental staff of the Commission's Office of Energy Projects. 4 The Council on Environmental Quality regulations addressing cooperating agency responsibilities are at Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 1501.6. Docket No. P17-4 1-000 Appendix 1 ! - I - rt • " g 1 Iir �rc 34"Es Jar V .. "• .1 1 hl ••baa l CO-yy`AlIFILI t'ri *et' i le 4+„Flhl,10414.5 ,--N iSiflLI MI WIC'S ■ it .+' -. • I if cE „_ p I _ - ell • Nei N - n ' -••'h i.-•.- _ .rf - Iii9lat- i,fr ' O Y Nast.FiIre K 0 u• "`• iT a' f' °' I" .'Z i 6.l i}rj��. 9 `'` L e, L di , or 4 .rr�pp z _ -'�I._Pas v -a.�,. - lit �- .. ii cj ,r ��++ r I 4 �� rryyw • R :L •tip • i• l. .Y` a e,`' lam.") d '• kif I. Stria. a y 1 14 I de Of • on a ■ - ✓ t '� - ° L - f _ I fr L r le — — [ L pp J , 1 ?i:rylie . �j • t •. sw ''q . e %J 11 - It IL •111 �F- -� Is•• 4- t t de ! rr r- n' r eT a IL. -rte'` -r;' ;.M•' 1 l ..(t� p —ill C P g •7YF' _ lihiletall 1 11 ' r iii Si 6A 1 I 1- �. • F -� H..,k I ii e� .f`�' ��.• — .tea �,�•_ ,;: C !' - f a. • I 4 • r it 11 ■ rL" + J ti .f . .. ` sally =4 'e ni 5 d RII • j1_ �r CI �y t r rc • .:. • •-• &Sr -.. la ' 'i` '/- _ - f _ . -'f� - - - - s.a�...- • . lq'■e r . :: . ' ft.• 1 III - Y r \.j� .-IIt r i' ✓ r T D r 2 C,i C 8 f: I iii DS a � N � Q s- iv ()c c C R 1C O_ d le K8rY atF • Boa$ M iii co Tr J a g95 C rWA -4i 5 ung Proposed Pipeline Surface Site C CO Cu ro it O Cr m 12 4• g :a O 09 r Docket No. P17-481-000 - consultations Under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act In accordance with the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's implementing regulations for section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, we are using this notice to initiate consultation with the Colorado State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), and to solicit its views and those of other government agencies, interested Indian tribes, and the public on the project's potential effects on historic properties.' We will define the project -specific Area of Potential Effects (APE) in consultation with the SHPO as the project develops. On natural gas facility projects, the APE at a minimum encompasses all areas subject to ground disturbance (examples include construction right-of-way, contractor/pipe storage yards, compressor stations, and access roads). Our EA for this project will document our findings on the impacts on historic properties and summarize the status of consultations under section 106. Environmental Mailing List The environmental mailing list includes federal, state, and local government representatives and agencies; elected officials; environmental and public interest groups; Native American Tribes; other interested parties; and local libraries and. newspapers. This list also includes all affected landowners (as defined in the Commission's regulations) who are potential right-of-way grantors, whose property may be used temporarily for project purposes, or who own homes within certain distances of aboveground facilities, and anyone who submits comments on the project. We will update the environmental mailing list as the analysis proceeds to ensure that we send the information related to this environmental review to all individuals, organizations, and government entities interested in and/or potentially affected by the proposed project. If we publish and distribute the EA, copies of the EA will be sent to the environmental mailing list for public review and comment, If you would prefer to receive a paper copy of the document instead of the CD version or would like to remove your name from the mailing list, please return the attached Information Request (appendix 2). Becoming an intervenor In addition to involvement in the EA soaping process, you may want to become an "intervenor" which is an official party to the Commission's proceeding. Intervenors play a more formal role in the process and are able to file briefs, appear at hearings, and be 5 The Advisory Counc it on Historic Preservation's regulations are at Title 36, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 800. Those regulations define historic properties as any prehistoric or historic district, site, building, structure, orobject included in or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. Docket Na. ' P17-4 1- + - 6 a heard by the courts if they choose to appeal the Commission's final ruling. An intervenor formally participates in the proceeding by filing a request to intervene. Instructions for becoming an intervenor are in the "Document -less Intervention Guide" under the "e - filing" link on theCommission's website. Motions to intervene are more fully described at http://www.fere.goviresourcesiguides/how-to/intervene.asn. Additional Information Additional information about the project is available from the Commission's Office of External Affairs, at (866) 208-FERC, or on the FERC website at www.ferc.gov using the "eLibrary" link. Click on the eLibrary link, click on "General Search" and enter the docket number, excluding the last three digits in the Docket Number field (i.e., CP17A81). Be sure you have selected an appropriate date range. For assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at Ferc n l i n e u pp ort T t re ...go v or toll free at (866) 208- 3676, or for TTY, contact (202) 502-8659. The eLibrary link also provides access to the texts of formal documents issued by the Commission, such as orders, notices, and rulemakings. In addition, the Commission offers a free service called e ubscription which allows you to keep track of all formal issuances and submittals in specific dockets. This can reduce the amount of time you spend researching proceedings by automatically providing you with notification of these filings, document summaries, and direct links to the documents. Go to www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp. Finally, public sessions or site visits will be posted on the Commission's calendar located at www.ferc.goviEventCalendariEventsListaspx along with other related information. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary. Docket No. CP17-481-000 Appendix 1 Appendix 1 Docket No. PI7-481-000 Appendix Appendix 2 Docket No. CP17-4 1-000 Appendix INFORMATION R Me bourn 3 Residue East Pipeline Project Name Agency Address City State Zip Code ❑ Please send me a paper copy of the published NEPA, document Please remove my name from the mailing list FROM ATTN: 0EP Gas 4, NI -11.4 Federal Energy Regulatory ommission 888 First Street NE Washington, DC 20426 (CPI -48 '-000 . bourn 3 Residue East Pipeline Project) Staple or Tape Here R s. Y. v4- • L -4{S. _ 0 zzLeaL:.... 4,5 • Cs T • R "1/4.11••••,N ioceseit D ifcc7ff_ re l e tati- _ O F CV in anir a lona c Cs 1 1 oi L tc ' \se1,,jer t. I a Vt. flcac a reGr .d/70� r f /nrrth eth 411:birl rLiett2`_ t A' 1 �„ .- op . Off w..1ry r r F %; • O vla ,_ • iffifrce7 6:,;$4,-ez ^ -eAgra I ., r eat ii /1, . ergar •4- J .. — a- bot a ce dcct,c i IrrTf' aemireematgineer 11--ats tc) tc)i) &cyr- cif / r' w e r if 4c, Cele r• 4,0 f4> - itinn _ ` /n _rye,..-•'i larSIVa •VV.. — .— .. w........,..._. --__ iNr ao 7) "0_5r/a f / �, f�\Let" g . accieliltate- I •...4 0•14441a din oy Al pt fc E Q &i(7 3€75 PL O M `t3 I rnrnon i cc -tiors 91 0171 l 7 —1"1"7' Sal _ 7 • Neighborhood to DCP MEWBOURN 3 ln response to your (DCP) request for specific proposals. 0- We (your neighbors) want to share our thoughts, knowledge and research Agenda Options for sound reduction walls ►Options for berm with trees/ shrubs & irrigation ►Review map with sound reduction walls, berms, trees/ shrubs Ongoing contraction Mitigation: Options- sound reduction walls ► AIL Soundwalls Ease installation, No heavy equipment required. Craig Cook — U.S. Market Manager (678) 260 — 8687 cell ccook@ailsoundwalls.com www.ailsoundwalls.com PVC absorptive sound barrier wail system with acoustical mineral wool Noe Reduction Cffldent (NCQ rating of 1 A the highest achievable rating Dr AbDrbs unwanted noise NOISE REDUCTION barrier wall systems reduce the unwanted noise to acceptable levels and block the view for increased security. Phone 1-877-357-2695 http://vvww.kineticsnoise.com /noiseblock/barrier walls.html ► Email: sales@kineticsnoise.com Options- sound reduction walls eN c'se Control: Specializing in Acoustics, Noise & Vibration Control �• 129 Penn Street, Westfield, IN 46074 ► Phone 317-774-1900 Fax 317-774-1911 ► www.enoisecontrol.com ► info©enoisecontroLcom Wall Panel Construction eNoise Control Sound Barrier Wall panels are fabricated with an outer solid shell of 16/18 guage and inner perforated shell of 22 guage. Panels are stiffened with 18 guage internal channels and edge rails. The acoustic grade fill is 2.5 to 6 pcf long strand fiberglass or mineral wool depending on the ap- plication. Both fills are inert, mildew resistant, vermin proof, and incobustible and are suitable for wetldry and freeze/thaw cycling. Mating panels are attached by inherent tongue and groove panel joints. Typical panel joints are horizontal, how- ever vertical panel joints are used depending on the project requirements and asethetics desired. Pond Cutaway • n SonaGuard NoteThe SonaGuard Absorptive Noise Barrier is the highest quality reinforced fiberglass noise barrier on the market. Phone 844-203-8632 ► https://www.soundfighter.com/ contact/ Email: info©soundfighter.com Options- sound reduction walls ,cont., More links: hops://www.soundfighter.com/products/Ise-absorptive-noise- barriers/product-photo-gallery/ ► htt.: www.kineticsnoise.com noiseblock barrier walls.html http://www.acoustiguard.corn/productsJsoundproofing-walls ceilings/sound-barrier-walls.html ► http:/Jwww.cfshbs.com/cfs concrete.php Options- berm with trees/ shrubs & irrigation (cont.) Xcel Energy's Berm CR 19 & CR 18 ► Minimum 25' berm with brick work here and there, grass and staggered trees of various varieties. '�' �•qtr.- 'tr'4A• " qtr.-• ••a^i �rT- - I ,._ . .—its. 1J .1�� '• •l. • .. ..r..... 'i't"^—'�'^ _nerioci�..•�. ''Lis .+-1� , .� r,IPI You can see how road slopes up into plant. o' This berm goes around the entire perimeter. 4 'ull Sae Evergreen tree: Colorado Spruce, Austrian Pin, Ponderosa Pin P IIIMulti Stern Tree: Canada Red Cherry, &mDr IM ap lei Tartarsan Mapie Full Size Shade tree: Princeton Elm, IIackbeTry. liar Oaks Sensation map Our proposal Walls - sound reduction Minimum of 28' high We gave four examples and we are ok with anyone. Berm with trees/ shrubs & irrigation: Harmony Gardens reference slide. Lay out: As referenced in the Map Layout slide. Need dust reduction Examples: Cow compost, straw , seeding, water Back up Slides 0 Q Thank you, I'd like to speak about Berms. There are 3 packets containing pictures and descriptions of the 8 different sites that I visited in Weld County. Another two sites are included in the power point addendum. Please note that I wasn't able to access the sites in their entirety due to trespassing concerns. Most of my observations were taken from the roadways adjacent to the various sites. I estimated the footprints of the sites and the heights of the berms encompassing them. These packets will be going around the room for you to look at. I will focus on 6 slides that represent the various locations and sizes of the berms. Please refer to the packets for more pictures of each site and their descriptions. There are at least 5 different types of industries represented I this presentation that construct berms and each industry has their own financial resources available for constructing them. DCP is by far the largest of its kind in the gas and oil industry and it is the most financially resourceful of all the companies that are represented in this presentation according to the information on company websites. The other companies like Excel Energy are large but the homebuilders are local and significantly smaller and have less financial resources available than DCP. The old sugar mill in Johnstown was by far a very small and local company with limited financial resources and yet they have a 10' berm around the perimeter on a location on their site. The industries represented are: Gas and Oil Xcel Energy Home Developers Manufacturing And an Old Sugar Mill All but 3 sites would be considered large and on par with Mewbourn's footprint. What I found was: Berms are common among a variety of industries, they can be very substantial, meaning 20-30' high and around the entire perimeter of a site. The larger sites, with tall equipment typically berm around their entire perimeter but this isn't limited to just the larger sites. The berms consist of: dirt native grasses trees and shrubs. Irrigation is used to establish the plants When the pictures were shown to the neighbors, many people commented on just how normal and common place berms are! I absolutely agree, the construction of berms is a normal and common practice that a variety of industries invest their financial resources in for the benefit of good relations with their neighbors. I'd like to show the 6 slides now so that you can see a few examples of what I'm talking about. Slide one please: Excel Energy plant is on CR 19 and CR 18 in Firestone It is an example of an aesthetically pleasing berm that is substantial in nature. I estimated its height to be about 25' on the north side and it extends at least a 1/4 mile along the north side of the plant. In the packet that is going around, you will see pictures of the south side where the berm is 15'. Notice the variety of trees and how they are staggered at various heights along the entire berm. Also notice that the berm is in grass. Excel also went to the expense to add brick work at the entrance and along several breaks along the north side. This is a fairly large site Slide 2 please: Slide two is an Anandarko gas industry site located on CR 18 and CR 21, just to the NE of the Excel site. This is a large site also. Notice that this site also has a substantial berm and it goes around the entire perimeter. It is about 25' tall. On the south side, they have installed a variety of trees along the top of the berm. There a very few neighbors close in to these two sites and yet Excel and Anandarko have gone to the expense of constructing a substantial berm around their entire perimeters. Slide 3 please: This site is located just off of Crossroads Blvd and Hwy 257. It is just west of the home development that is going in for Water Valley that also has a berm that will be shown in the next slide. It is a fairly small gas industry site and is bermed with Rolling Hills and trees. There are several breaks in the berm for pipeline access I'm assuming. It looks very natural. With this slide, and the photos in the packet, I wanted to point out that this type of berm is actually very aesthetically pleasing as it looks very natural, even with the breaks. Having breaks in the berm to address pipeline concerns was an issue that Craig brought up at the last meeting when he suggested that having breaks might look weird. In fact, it doesn't look weird but very natural. Slide 4 please: This site is at Crossroads Blvd and Hwy 257. It's a Homebuilders site at Water Valley along the ridgeline above. This is a picture of a huge berm, 30' high and at least a 1/4 mile long if not longer. It is being built by a Home Developer and for no apparent reason, in my opinion. The berm will block the view of the valley from the homes being built to the south side of it. In fact, I am having trouble understanding why a home builder would go through the expense of building such a substantial berm if it isn't necessary and actually blocks views and takes up valuable real estate. Yet, we have a local home builder financing a huge berm, which begs the question, if a home builder with less financial means than DCP constructs a berm for an unknown purpose, why can't DCP finance a substantial berm to address the very real concerns of its neighbors? Slide 5 please: This is a large site again along Crossroads blvd and just to the west of a housing development. I estimate the berm to be between 25'30' high visually limiting the plant presence. It is bermed around the entire perimeter Slide 6 please: This site is very large and comparable to Mewbourn's footprint and is an oil and gas industry site. It is also on Crossroads Blvd west of the other sites. I estimate the berm to be at 30' and it goes around 3 sides of the site, to the W, N and E and may eventually encompass the south side when construction is completed. It is directly east of a very large home development that is being prepared for building residential homes. This berm basically makes the large plant disappear from the view of its future neighbors. In conclusion: Construction of berms, some which are very substantial and encompass the entire perimeter of their sites, is a normal and commonplace practice. Various types of industries construct berms for a variety of reasons. The financial ability to construct berms varies from local companies to the larger industries, yet DCP is by far the largest and wealthiest of the companies represented in this presentation according to my research. I would like for DCP to give serious consideration about how the construction of a substantial berm around the majority of the perimeter at the Mewbourn would be an investment in current and future relationships with its neighbors. DCP, as a company, may want to entertain the idea that constructing substantial berms around their various sites, wherever they may be located, should be automatically included in their "Standards of Best Practices". It seems to me that Excel Energy, Anandarko, and the local Homebuilders take their responsibilities of being good neighbors far more seriously than DCP to date. I hope that you will give this serious consideration in your response to our suggestions and recommendations for constructing a berm at the Mewbourn site. In my opinion, and from my observations regarding berms at other locations, I feel that this is a reasonable request and is an investment in the future. As your neighbors, we are recommending that DCP construct a substantial berm around the majority of the perimeter of the Mewbourn site as it is evidenced that it is a normal and commonplace practice among a variety of industries located in northern Colorado and it is quite attainable. 2) I. i' 7 C 0 W a 4� O 0 L C 47 C 0 r C C. C y i retr.14SY,' `rA_...c:.l a 4) f S ft It -4 1 Z Q lam} L• a 4 I •1 cT (Fein • V C. 0 c cu t' 0 C' C CJ Z y Ir CA SN Jamestown 4, CO O et Law— • z c c � a. C ci c fts ft 41 • C 0 M N a) (O C) _N 0) 0 0 {0 O N O co 4-i CO 0 a Co United States CC -- L- --t fttt l e ve / f "... ' ., ESTI M. ATE Be 12 Nk AT ad .I� .''1: yf e "':1' f 0�3 Al \r1 ak Si 4e. bets ical covare4 � bkrn rc3h,si- next- tip qiSr SS roo4c ro wy a67 4, N liBer m airourd era- r c.'¢.�i�i1-; ��.�ysr. _�.' .. - . .,��y .,,•. 1, `.. fi 4' i�:+Wu' .. �iC !'-r ,Pa .y �'�_F'y� 1' f' K,,•S. x�.� •1..�.. Imo. ` `�,,��}i W� :9i , v..rGo ix'� .Oiaaoir- .4 �47-?:'frieW ylts es +..- .lrhy. :;44"* _ _ p:.1000 x• '. cr€5sr804c-' /AosstY� 4in'Fe r i eft.r A at vtA op rA et +- 1' d: lin, JAS.,�'-'err,., M- Vey Or thrs rograaes cogat"r lo mit n 91'- ^i Nrr �. "_,-,K 0cr1i= F:If. . i!.1e-- ?n?AS%vr..g77 'rp?'0l+"g Vafa.'� 4, • '.' l lr St.:? �os5RoA4�s B��9 — Smotth SATE JUST SOIATH of p.� Lr�RC1E 13eRM - EXH1SiT T CSfrirt BERM 6108E A-12-01.wb peAAfrER OF THIS SITE — Io'•1I rFwxo • • 4., fr ''rote?4 1ti11. .Ma .1� • •YrY .A fses. ,,y ,Ij 4r ,a g -41C- yS: i- -ic&' r -4T a 8 r Fn ",,E'l r «%. SrrE Z S Wi .1 • _ .1'•S. _):.iii• 3')_. :Q FLALA-Si 1 a, 3 on ascss ioftDS SmitFLL CI r�s SITE 3� )4orAES,..:.&Gni; MPIEE Bmed-rainn ter i5' /} LL ?�ROR1J13 pyajAEtEIQ �' IZErticS" it\I BE Rrn HERE/1WD THEia•G 5 -irc 1n� f' 3' \ ` w'ji v.. -�'3 .".y'�r,.,�r'if:,:.�� '!i �_ ;4. .: rJ' :�� _ 'T $ r' i:. -• • __ 3 .�.. �"� 5',�S 'CL S f.,j. ,•s y_^!V =%-.:r:':r?j �' i r% - al: �...)�_i� _•: y�'it, • 'r:7 .134x_••••t `? .. ,:t- j1 F SI'':4-7/9;CYM .R IY' �� (� •Lti � •� `}^ .:'...., f. .:L'T =' .�� i4^ �•✓i Y'n Y - a'. -_A �4{��•'��/� �F�w _ S:, 1` "t _r.t.c C' k5 ��A' ).t4;,;i'^ :+ "R.'�f�/ p, .fi.. • ;11,.. , .. '`:',.t k' •'X:`? r' ,y'�- T ; .i:•y j 1` .. ,r.. }✓ �!F3iA.::.�t3 i05t`:p`1!'.y . �y..'fF`. ,,.': S' .trs� •^.'It', h t'r.'rh.�: :.`:a.: .. e i u4. 41-: ' P Vi n ''.✓+ . K '..-::... +S+�*:$2:\ eit.:,-.;.Y', f....-•, t's!":L riYsf:::r .y ♦! 1�1♦� X\• Y�1• G}h t'�y4.: �t'acs e .14 410 ezz }-1 frtc Y v✓ti • Ta • 4 1••••,.. aft 21/2„ a PY pay , :WA. -1. 4+ i 7 • y' f4' /aJ .,.. , itali eng,•a $ A PlEilLI No REA-so fu FOR 0Egm s BLOCKS I-bme'S vistAl oF rrtE VLL9I.tJust SEE 43Etepn. Iti Btdlc:cYfW-iD, Fxpe'sIvg Amb FOg- 0 Sn 5 w J rg5 N 3 SThReS4 Abuse ON Lade-k-S&le - 51 eTh4e,- /1/4/ :gogr Siput, 01F C 055 toribs 'BLVD AT/4n-55 ) WVthOPmt0 `.•G'ty"._d T,G.� -:y :•�'�,�,-.�>;._-��. :?'tea^.•':Sci''�=�'��L �:�'kc,. _qtc'_•:.: i':'a�`izr: -lfi ai:y'o-a-'��>�u: �S:i ',�1.iY^Al'y-:py^_� �=�,.. i! • .{i��E .'.7._:_ " 't l �.p^J<' i :. i. - c'f A•7."�.:: �.' :�:f: J�`. �,. .t_.y:%s��t-,��acfc�?rG(' J•."'i;.`-!:' j. .' tea.^` _ �}}^ i°sF>.' �,, . �� s w: i JJ? .t �_{. - _'�'_'�.:^: :.'vS':i •°+�.t: '. ",:fr G^yP: .::[..r .. � .S, :"`e1 -= '• �-� ... �% ' ' .•t:.j:.-''3ti; {y' •z%"�h.C I a'i-`? F:•r•''J3'T'"S:�q � 1.5��. S '�: «: JY ti:.. iCvir.••L n. [ Y, :•:}"�. \Y:.f { :�:`2"_'>}F-i_S �:•tijIIw'�'��/-. �j/ ] � • � r'ti_l,•. ep A�; .1..- ::L „ :eY.c. _ ('f :S:•¢. yS� 5'7.� 't S.•'�+Y,�.-. �i•'�C. —/;■*.�.�J]/�`/ �� r`il-. � yy4� C''; R, r`:4'+::. :�- . _l: :al � <.1::;: 4• .�,tF.'�.'' J:•, ; -: _- p:>� �..,.ii a�., - $ati,". •V• •^l'o ; �N=i Fi. :a ,(: - a<1 .r by c;\':;... 'A"/��...+ oT •'}:' �:: �a::''S.�: - �j',it': ��: ' � •�:' ' `.ni .:i :Y .S i i. 1-. .:.'C.r � \�.p: �+'�., <-r.y "1.. :'��... t `y'..e..:.7 =' iii �'L2i : `�: • i �'��•z. '�f eil.�:;`.z;'„.L. :..6. •.o z:•.-.}.i : .�:i•.. •_ y j,. Ys .L .L r _. _ _ c•_1�. �rCLiL%� •1.✓_ v2ir _ .JI: > •. )li _.. _. �L'%! "'v s�i:ti*:.'V .'1'-:\:`1vf::, 'r �:o`+:. _ _ •_lrv:i •��aY._:♦♦'C:i`d> t�`- ._.r•._YyL �i-1.,y. .4a y;� l "-S• t � P 's:: �..> tea_ -L. .:�J: ._.x'"-�i:'J�C 'y.•�.._ .4';r,}':'t t: '.••' ._,r. l� 11: ... •�-t�,... '�•'.. •H4� ,>;': sr - A- •� •r Ss" L.i x:"Ji _ � i• �g „_:. 1Y / •.:r. •Y- �YL% tip% .y9'o. _�....:}• S§7 •- -rr J -fir: T '')- rY'.' rK 'L ✓^l_.r.,:.ie`_ .-. .":Y - �^p b_- --S+•' -e� --.r..r..._.. ':r. :+� ^fir c-✓:�: ` i>. S.... i'i'yN' j'�eSl ..Lo' ik.. L.'v-♦T:'i:`• �~• •:?:Y.> __- ,:/:':.': .+._ _ .[ 44: �'�D�\?=�� '.�. Jl. y .Ni: + iii. .Tn '--l'.].;+,. _`:>:w'S:..•,'::J:y �. .6,+ .;; '�• ;�'.:55. 'yr>ti a..r_;_:•[,. - '..gr;f ,.•�.'i:.'.Sri_ _ _ Yp : t., .. �2`.AL'_'4;J'- n. , ae- lift'{ �yR'!4: SUJu M1Fc..;;; �•Y,'K.t.`S3.f tPp.yS 1tx vI• l.g.4414 • NrG }A y ass S . • Attie id T /.y ort k L • { I 9 r,3 r • SITE 7 MJPr OD flLQ T4LLTTJWUE 01 ig agn-i NuCIE et tarn frizzuob Pai ThETER Fs ri nn et-TE RE(G.Wr A -T 25'—SuSsyprkjtjhL V fi-R-i GT'J OF Tr? Ea lfrEt very feud close in Aei5k hors r_ • ' xf 1N1 l u .• ,L 'a �,5 :v►-�. -ro 11.• -• • LJ yi y Worn -n 9xrrr-J wo c -- NP Na a5 1 S EP--YY\ Y E-12.4 rn ETER, c(XtST7JT(P\L 1 4 • I. •-..•sr. Zr1N �.. le• f e• • •j ;V:_ • � • • a 4 • ; • • .44 . ' n • • I. •• , '/•• • , _ ;. + ly —� • •r I• i • a' , 1- • 1 • \ ••4• ; • i -par • r J •I r • - •r • 1 • • .•' A • • • • Ii -1. •, • i a - � • - s a , - I e• • •-� • • '� f • I , .j �; • • 'hi'• • • • 1 • •r ! r: • I - r. t r • 1 st I , t y` I i; • •I• .1 • • •. Qfr • • • 4 .1 •• • •i • : J • • I •..1• I • • .t Y . - -•• I ; I 1 • ;so - ..1../ a • !' - a. r i • 'e I, • .4. . .t •s, -I• T�jF•.• • •• • • • t ! - • ^ J• . - 4 - .r.qL, • • •t " J• • .. 't • r I • I • _•, l.• •t4 V q • .I. - •.J- _t . i' • � ( ♦ ! At I • !r• • ... •.� / NI !",11 _ _, •..•• • 1 r f. Zt : I. - yn3 Pi f 1 • -I .• • a t• ti ••4 • y 'ti 1: • 1 • \ •• !. • 9 • a I• • • I I. • A { I •. • f • r.' • • • • • "4 • 1- ? ,I •. • tt 3 • SIB 1�,♦ i• w •• tiJs`r Y3 4 • - 1� ♦ : • •' ' • ,\ 7. 4 z F - ., +I /•,t •je ). v' _ • I, ;..• t• 1� M • ♦ I 1 'a -I' • '4.0 4t. +- ?•• i S. � ..•L; :. • .. , • d 1, . ,+, 1.. 1 .9r• . r • • • •• • It '-_ • . f • • „ S 1 I I •. 1 • • f• • •. or r • ar t. • • • • • • r �qr - -+.•fir `..•�<Mu , - _ '_",n.S::r, s•. Asa �4lFa x e- rtcit ^h %-' ;.:'. _ "FRS?:4. r`y. • 'hii-m '�''IYp6'by�:a T... =r>iarj,�K.v:.-vait"+';a �A�Y,6.i:ny.�' •xr;'6f90A.FAjl.yy4r .. ,. Wr?Xe::.LTAviaW3?4,a. S47eHiLi.�y�. '°"??Z4'wa.:�,r: 'in;(pypyfq�,t, ♦- 44'41,114WaN'>,>S:,,:, 2' 7t ":��.tr_.,'•irv.. � .3h'e�a ,r6p;;y,,: ..; ;. 0 • W \Jarie+j avid levels cc -frees atc iF "j5G • +y�I.. ilitAiatHtemgclientbit >« ; ,• • • 3 COLORADO Department of Public Health £t Environment AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DIVISION COMPLIANCE ADVISORY CASE NO. 2017-75 AIRS NO. 123/0090 INSPECTION DATE: Sept. 23, 2016 U.S. CERTIFIED MAIL NO. 7016 2710 0000 3004 2517 MAILING DATE: July 5, 2017 SOURCE CONTACT: Patricia Grajeda de Babb IN THE MATTER OF DCP Midstream, LP This Compliance Advisory provides format notice, pursuant to § 25-7-115 2 ), C.R.S., of alleged violations or noncompliance discovered during the Air Pollution Control Division's ("Division") inspection and/or review of records related to DCP's Facility identified below. The Division is commencing this action because it has ca use to believe that the compliance issues identified below may constitute violations of the Colorado Air Pollution Prevention and Control Act ("the Act") and its implementing regulations. Please be aware that you are responsible for complying with applicable State Pp air pollution requirements and that there are substantialpenalties for failing to do Pursuant so. to the enforcement authority provided the Division by § 25-7-115, C.R.S. any person who violates the Act, its implementing regulations or any permit issued thereunder may be issued an order for compliance that can include permit revocation ocation and assessment of penalties of up to $15,000 per day of such violation in accordance ce with § 25-7-122, C.R.S. The issuance of this Compliance Advisory does not in any way limit or preclude the Division from pursuing additional enforcement options concerning this inspection/review. Also, this Compliance Advisory does not constitute a bar to enforcement action for violations not specifically addressed in this Compliance Advisory. Failure to respond to this Compliance Advisory by the date indicated at the end of this Compliance Advisory may be considered by the Division in the subsequent q t dVmfrun ! CQ�i�i7)bD 943-ao,7 �// COLORADO EXHIBITco �V /Ur Pollution Control Donsion • TV/W \\: AO/7fl75 Pir0993 enforcement action and the assessment of penalties. Furthermore, the Division's enforcement process contemplates a full and final resolution of the compliance p e issues herein addressed, and those that may result from further review, in a timely If at any time throughout the process manner. g of reaching such a resolution the Division determines that the Parties cannot agree to the dispositive facts, compliance pp ance requirements and/or penalty assessments (if any) associated with this Compliance Advisor or a resultant enforcement p Y� o cement action, the Division may exercise its full enforcement authority allowed under the law. DCP Midstream, LP ("DCP") owns and operates the Mewbourn Natural Gas Processing Plant located in 35409 Weld County Road 18 in Weld County, Colorado ("Facility"). The Facility and the following equipment are subject to the terms conditions of Colorado Air Quality Control Statutes; Colorado Air Quality Control Commission ("AQCC") Regulations; and the Compliance Order on Consent in Case No. 2015-073, effective June 21, 2016 ("COC"), entered into between the Divisio n and DCP. The following equipment is subject to Permit Number 09WE1136 Issuance 2, issued to DCP on June 28, 2012 ("Permit Number 09WE1136 Issuance 2")• AIRS Point Facility Equipment ID Point Description P 101 C-211 Caterpillar, Model G379NA, SN: 72B641, 330 HP RICE 102 C-167 Waukesha, Model L7044GSI, SN: C13852-1, 1,680 HP RICE 103 C-179 Waukesha, Model L7042GSI, SN: 240410, 1,478 HP RICE 104 C-129 Waukesha, Model L7042 GU, SN: 286822, 896 HP RICE 105 C-134 Waukesha, Model L7042GU, SN: 285300, 896 HP RICE 106 C-130 Waukesha, Model L7042GSI, SN: 339839, 1,478 HP RICE 107 C-131 Waukesha, Model L7042GSI, SN: 397541, 1,478 HP RICE 108 F017 Facility Equipment Leaks 109 LO Condensate loadout 110 TANKS Four (4) tanks for storage of stabilized natural gas condensate 111 C0170 Solar, turbine Model Taurus 60, SN: TC10559, natural gas fired combustion 112 C0180 Solar, turbine Model Taurus 60, SN: TC10560, natural gas fired combustion 7 COLORADO Air Pollution Control Division AIRS Point Equipment Facility ID Point Description P 113 C250 Caterpillar, Model G3608TALE, SN: BEN00563, 2,370 HP RICE 114 C251 Caterpillar, Model G3608TALE, SN: BEN00565, 2,370 HP RICE 115 C252 Caterpillar, Model G3608TALE, SN: BEN00567, 2,370 HP RICE 116 C253 Caterpillar, Model G3608TALE, SN: BENOO572, 2,370 HP RICE 117 C254 Caterpillar, Model G3608TALE, SN: BEN00571, 2,370 HP RICE 118 G1650 Solar, Model Taurus 70, SN: TG09548, natural gas fired combustion turbine 119 G1670 Solar, Model Taurus 70, SN: TG09549, natural gas fired combustion turbine 120 AM001 Precision Pipe Et Vessel, LLC, Model 1502, SN: 2381-9089 Natural gas sweetening system 121 H776 Optimized Process Furnace, Inc., Model 200, SN: J091036, natural gas fired amine regeneration reboiler 122 D-931 Exterran, SN: 8907, Triethylene glycol (TEG) Natural gas dehydration system Two (2) Devco, Model HeliFlow, SN: 3431-3, natural gas fired hot oil 123 H771 heaters. used Only as a backup. one heater to be operated at a time, the other is to be 124 1O701 Anguil Environmental Services, Inc., Model 200, SN: 14808, regenerative thermal oxidizer D n r rr'i 4- 1st 1....... L....- /l fl \ ma- 4 .r ^1 / I - - - - -% - .1 1`lul1IIJC� V7VV .�o, issuance s, was issued to ULP Midstream, LP on October 21, 2016. I. ALLEGED VIOLATIONS AND FACTS On September 23, 2016, Stephen Riley, of the Division, inspected the Facility. Y Based on Mr. Riley's inspection, and a review of records related to the Facility, the Division has identified the following compliance issues: A. Pursuant to Permit Number 09WE1136 Issuance 2, Condition 5, DCP is required to limit emissions from AIRS Point 108 (fugitive emissions, F017) to 31.73 tons per year (tpy) of VOC on a rotting 12 -month basis. DCP exceeded the annual VOC emission Limit for AIRS Point 108 for the rotting 12 -month periods ending June 2015 through August 2016, as follows: COLORADO Air Pollution Control Division DCP e the rotting 12 -month periods ending June 2015 through August g g 2016, in violation of Permit Number 09WE1136, Condition 5.1 Rolling month ending 12- period Reported tpy Jun -15 42.35 Jul -15 42.39 Aug -15 42.43 Sep -15 42.47 Oct -15 42.51 Nov -15 42.53 Dec -15 42.51 Jan -16 42.49 Feb -16 42.59 Mar -16 42.57 Apr -16 42.55 May -16 42.53 Jun -16 42.20 Jul -16 41.87 Aug -16 41.54 B. Pursuant to Permit Number 09WE1136 Issuance 2, Condition 33, DCP must demonstrate compliance with the requirements of this permit by following the operating and maintenance (O&M) plan and record keeping format approved by the Division. The approved O&M plan for AIRS Point 102 (engine C-167) states that DCP shall establish the catalyst differential pressure (dP) baseline during each initial compliance and portable analyzer test. DCP must monitor and record the catalyst dP monthly and must maintain catalyst dP within (plus or minus) 2 inches of water column from the baseline. DCP failed to maintain catalyst dP within (plus or minus) 2 inches of water column from the baseline for AIRS Point 102 for the months of November 2015, December 2015, and January 2016, in violation of Permit Number 09WE1136, Condition 33. C. Pursuant to Permit Number 09WE1136, Condition 33, DCP must demonstrate compliance with the requirements of this permit by following the O&M plan and record keeping format approved by the Division. The approved OEtM plan for AIRS Point 110 (TANKS) states that the thief hatch seals shall be inspected for integrity annually and 1 DCP submitted an APEN to the Division on July 27, 2015 requesting an increase to 4 � the annual permitted emission limit for AIRS Point 108 from 31.73 tpy to 50.79 tpy of VOC. Issuance 3 of Permit Number 09WE1136 with the increased annual emission limit for AIRS Point 108 of 50.8 tpy of VOC was issued to DCP on October 21, 2016. .F,' COLORADO -CQ Air Pollution Control Division V replaced as necessary; pressure relief valves (PRV) shall be inspected annually for proper operation and replaced as necessary; and PRVs shall be set to release at a pressure that wilt ensure flashing, working and breathing tosses (as applicable) are routed to the control device under normal operating conditions. DCP failed to perform an inspection on the thief hatch seats and PRVs during 2015, in violation of Permit Number 09WE1136, Condition 33. During the inspection on September 23, 2016, emissions were observed with an IR camera from the PRVs on two of the four tanks, demonstrating that DCP failed to ensure that PRVs were set to release at a pressure that ensured flashing, working and breathing tosses were routed to the control device under normal operating conditions, in violation of Permit Number 09WE1136, Condition 33. D. Pursuant to COC Paragraph 13, repairs shall be completed on the seven (7) components remaining on Delay of Repair no later than the next process unit shutdown before the end of 2016. DCP completed repairs on the seven (7) components remaining on Delay of Repair on December 28, 2016. However, a process unit shutdown on all units occurred from September 12 to September 15, 2016. DCP failed to repair the seven (7) components remaining on Delay of Repair no later than the next process unit shutdown, in violation of COC Paragraph 13. E. Pursuant to COC Paragraph 14, DCP was required to complete any necessary repairs to ensure the PRVs on the condensate storage tanks are operated to ensure flashing, working and breathing losses (as applicable) are routed to the control device under normal operating conditions by September 19, 2016. Venting was observed during the inspection on September 23, 2016, demonstrating that DCP failed to make necessary repairs by September 19, 2016, in violation of COC Paragraph 14. DCP repaired the PRVs on September 26, 2016. It is important to resolve the above -referenced issues as soon as possible. Therefore, the Division encourages DCP to immediately identify those compliance issues that are not in dispute and to rectify those issues before the upcoming Compliance Advisory meeting. pliance In accordance with 5 25-7-115(3)(a), C.R.S., the Compliance Advisory meeting will be held within thirty (30) days of the Division's issuance of the Compliance Advisory in this matter. The Division also requests that DCP provide the Division with a brief written response to the alleged violations ("Source Response"). The Source Response should identify the undisputed compliance issues and, if an alleged violation is disputed, the basis for the dispute. The Division requests that DCP provide the Source Response, to the attention of Stephen Riley, no COLORADO Air Pollution Control Division later than ten business days before the Compliance Advisory meeting. . At the upcoming meeting, the Division will confirm the actions taken to rectify the undisputed compliance issues and proceed with unresolved matters as outlined below. If you have any questions regarding this Compliance Advisory, the Division's enforcement processes, or any related issues, please refer to the APCD Enforcement Manual located at https: / /www.coloradogov/pacific/sites/; efault/files/AP- EnforcementandCornplianceGuide.pdf and/or contact the Division personnel identified below. II. COMPLIANCE ADVISORY MEETING DCP is requested to contact the Division and schedule a meeting to: r Discuss the disputed Compliance Advisory issues and answer any remaining questions you may have; ➢ Submit information necessary to successfully show that the deficiencies and noncompliance issues (or any portion of them) are not violations of Colorado's air pollution taws; and Establish a mutually acceptable schedule and guidelines for the full and final resolution of any remaining deficiencies and noncompliance issues in a timely manner. Please contact the compliance officer identified below by no later than July v 3 2017 to schedule a meeting with the Division to discuss the Compliance Advisory. The Division currently anticipates that the meeting will take place during the week of July 24, 2017. Lydia Jordan, Enforcement Advisor (303-692-3399) cc: Shannon McMillan, APCD Jennie Morse, APCD Chris Laplante, APCD Arch Crouse, APCD Michael Stovern, EPA (Region VIII) Stephen Riley, APCD Jen Mattox, APCD Heather Wuollet, APCD Tom Roan, Attorney General's Office File COLORADO Air Pollution Control Division Esther Gesick From: Sent: To: Subject: Julie Cozad Thursday, August 24, 2017 10:45 AM Eric Ewing; Sean Conway; Barbara Kirkmeyer; Steve Moreno; Mike Freeman; Tom Parko Jr.; Jennifer Mattox - CDPHE; Alex Scherer - CDPHE; James Taloumis; Esther Gesick Re: Letter Regarding DCP Midstream Mewbourn Gas Processing Plant Esther, Please make a part of the public record. Thanks, Julie Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone Original message From: Eric Ewing <ewinghr@yahoo.com> Date: 8/24/17 10:18 AM (GMT -07:00) To: Sean Conway <sconway@weldgov.com>, Barbara Kirkmeyer <bkirkmeyer@weldgov.com>, Julie Cozad <jcozad@weldgov.com>, Steve Moreno <smoreno@weldgov.com>, Mike Freeman <mfreeman@weldgov.com>, "Tom Parko Jr." <tparko@weldgov.com>, Jennifer Mattox - CDPHE <jennifer.mattox@state.co.us>, Alex Scherer - CDPHE <alex.scherer@state.co.us>, James Taloumis <j taloumis@weldgov. com> Subject: Letter Regarding DCP Midstream Mewbourn Gas Processing Plant Dear Commissioners and Regulators, Please see the attached letter. Let me know if you have questions. Sincerely, Eric Ewing g- 3a - z0(7 1 02o/7- iU7S PL 04143 Eric Ewing 16974 C R 40 La Salle, CO 80645 August 24, 2017 Weld County State of Colorado Re: DCP Midstream Mewbourn Gas Processing Plant Dear Weld County and the State of Colorado, The system to protect me and my family from harmful air pollution caused by the DCP Midstream Mewbourn gas plant has failed. On Saturday night, August 19, 2017, a malfunction at the gas plant caused harmful air pollution to enter my property which was detectable by odor. (Attachment A) On Monday, August 21, 2017, DCP Midstream Mewbourn confirms via email they had a malfunction at the plant. (Attachment B) On Monday, August 21, 2017, the gas plant again sends hazardous air pollution spewing into the air. (Attachment C) On Monday, August 21, 2017 a neighbor asks if I saw the black smoke coming from the DCP Midstream Mewbourn plant. (Attachment D) On Wednesday, August 23, 2017, DCP Midstream admits they did not know about the smoke coming from their plant. (Attachment E) The emissions from this facility are much higher than what you think they are. The excessive emissions affect our living conditions more than what you think it does. Sincerely Eric Ewing 8/23/2017 Print Window e X Subject: Odor From DCP Mewbourn From. ewinghr@yahoo.com To: jtaloumis@weldgov.com; alex.scherer@state.co.us Date �, zs 1/1 8/23/2017 Print Window a P; 9 Subject: RE: Clarification Needed: Potential Violation of Night-time Flaring Reduction Rule From: CJTaylor@dcpmidstream.com To: ewinghr@yahoo.com; DM)ost@dcpmidstream.com Cc: pgroom@wobjlaw.com; terridechant@yahoo.com; shfarms@skybeam.com; msrochell44@yahoo.com; rockyrissler@gmail.com; rickmargheim@aol.com; rick@aintrightranch.com; geraldjohnson733@gmail.com; clem970@aol.com; heavenlyhavens@msn.com; electandconnect@gmail.com; jcarlson201240@gmail.com; peteulrich@aol.com Date: Monday, August 2.1, 2017, 9A4:48 AM MDT Eric, X The flaring event on Saturday was not a planned event. We were having operational issue :,-. �f our compressor`s We are working to resolve this issue. Regards, Craig Taylor Mewbourn/Platteville Plant Supervisor Office: (970) 737-2549 x 1 Cell: (720) 202-7901 DCP Midstream 18295 WCR 35 Platteville. CO 80651 dant C'algisp Midstream From: Eric Ewing [mailto:ewinghr@yahoo.com] Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2017 6:44 PM To: Taylor, Craig J; Jost, David M Cc: Patrick Groom: Don & Terri Dechant; Pat & Dick Stahl; Scott & Rochell Sherman; Rocky Rissler; Rick Margheim; Rick; Gerald Johnson; Cindy & Randy Clement; Ed & Jill Lafferty; Lynette Kilpatrick; Jeff Carlson; Pete Ulrich Subject: Clarification Needed: Potential Violation of Night-time Flaring Reduction Rule Dear DCP, Looking for clarification on the reduced night-time flaring rule. Was the flaring and release event that happened late last night, Saturday, August 19, 20i! Even though it's a yes/no question, feel free to offer additional information as you wish Thanks, a planned event? 1/2 8/23/2017 Print Window Subject Re: Clarification Needed: Potential Violation of Night-time Flaring Reduction Rule From: clem970@aol.com To: ewinghr@yahoo.com Date: Monday, August 21, 2017, 10:05:13 PM MDT Eric, Did you happen to see the black smo --coming Cindy and Randy this afternoon? Monday, Aug 21 n X Original Message --- From: Eric Ewing <ewinghr@yahoo.com> To: Craig J. Taylor <cjtaylor@dcpmidstream.com>; David M. Jost <dmjost@dcpmidstream.com> Cc: Patrick Groom <pgroom@wobjlaw.com>; Don & Terri Dechant <terridechant@yahoo.com>; Pat & Dick Stahl <shfarms@skybeam.com>; Scott & RocheII Sherman <msrochell44@yahoo.com>; Rocky Rissler <rockyrissler@gmail.com>; Rick Margheim <rickmargheim@aol.com>; Rick <rick@aintrightranch.com>; Gerald Johnson <geraldjohnson733@gmail.com>; Cindy & Randy Clement <clem970@aol.com>; Ed & Jill Lafferty <heavenlyhavens@msn.com>; Lynette Kilpatrick <electandconnect@gmail.com>; Jeff Carlson <jcarlson201240@gmail.com>; Pete Ulrich <peteulrich@aol.com> Sent: Sun, Aug 20, 2017 6:43 pm Subject: Clarification Needed: Potential Violation of Night-time Flaring Reduction Rule Dear DCP, Looking for clarification on the reduced night-time flaring rule. Was the flaring and release event that happened late last night, Saturday, August 19, 2017, a planned event? Even though it's a yes/no question, feel free to offer additional information as you wish. Thanks, EE 1/1 8/23/2017 Print Window rro Subject: RE: RE: Clarification Needed: Potential Violation of Night-time Flaring Reduction Rule From. CJTaylor@dcpmidstream.com To ewinghr@yahoo.com Date: Wednesday, August 23, 2017, 8:45:54 AM MDT Eric, X I saw the drawing you sent as an example. We don't have a drawing of this kind for the new plant. We are working with an engineer/landscaper that might be able to create such a drawing, but I don't have anything at this moment. Yes, the compressor was fixed on Monday. I checked the with the operators andt dp rr for°logs and herev t b obstht1b tt smoke;'so I d Mewbourn. Regards, Craig Taylor Mewbourn/Platteville Plant Supervisor Office: (970) 737-2549 x 1 DCP Midstream 18295 WCR 35 Platteville. CO 80651 dcp Midstream From: Eric Ewing [mailto:ewinghr@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2017 9:11 PM To: Taylor, Craig J Subject: Re: RE: Clarification Needed: Potential Violation of Night-time Flaring Reduction Rule beleve the smoke you sawWas coming from Craig, Did you get a chance to check out that drawing I sent as an example? Did you get the compressor fixed yet? I saw some smoke on my way home from work yesterday drifting around. Was that the plant? And is that related to that compressor or some other equipment? Thanks, 1/2 Esther Gesick From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Sean Conway Saturday, August 19, 2017 3:11 PM Esther Gesick Fwd: My Public Comment from Yesterday's County Commissioner Meeting 2017-075 DCP Mewbourn CA.pdf; ATT00001.htm Esther - please add this to the public comment file in this case. Thanks, Sean. Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Eric Ewing <ewinghrayahoo.com> Date: August 17, 2017 at 4:42:43 PM MDT To: Sean Conway <sconwayaweldgov.com> Subject: My Public Comment from Yesterday's County Commissioner Meeting Reply -To: Eric Ewing <ewinghr@yahoo.com> Dear Commissioner Conway, I hope all is well. I made the following comments during yesterday's Public Comment portion of the County Commissioner meeting and wanted to make sure you were aware. I also provided the attachment to your fellow Commissioners and to Mr. Parko. My name is Eric Ewing, I live at 16974 CR 40, La Salle, CO 80645. I am a voter. I am here regarding ongoing problems with the DCP Midstream Mewbourn Gas Processing Facility that is located upwind of my house. In April, I asked the County to delay the land use hearings on their expansion until we knew everything about the air pollution problem and they were in full compliance. The County moved forward with the hearings anyway. According to the tracking number on the document I will hand to you, DCP Midstream Greeley office received it on July 10. On July 17, you unanimously approved the expansion. At that hearing, DCP Midstream misrepresented their compliance status. Not until July 24, was the meeting between the State of Colorado and DCP Midstream to discuss how to get them in compliance and fully resolve the issues. Thus, you approved expansion of a facility that was non -compliant, has been breaking the air pollution laws, and providing substandard living conditions for me and my family. (Irmo 2-022- 2oi7 1 2017-2875 (�t_oti 93 I'm not happy because I believe I have a right to clean air which I am not getting and have not been getting for over 6 years. The facility is a public nuisance causing harm and I expect swift and appropriate action from the County such as shutting the facility down for good. If you have any questions, please let me know. Sincerely, Eric Ewing 2 COLORADO Department of Public Health £t Environment AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DIVISION COMPLIANCE ADVISORY CASE NO. 2017-75 AIRS NO. 123/0090 INSPECTION DATE: Sept. 23, 2016 U.S. CERTIFIED MAIL NO. 7016 2710 0000 3004 2517 MAILING DATE: July 5, 2017 SOURCE CONTACT: Patricia Grajeda de Babb IN THE MATTER OF DCP Midstream, LP This Compliance Advisory provides formal notice, pursuant to § 25-7-115(2), C.R.S., of alleged violations or noncompliance discovered during the Air Pollution Control Division's ("Division") inspection and/or review of records related to DCP's Facility identified below. The Division is commencing this action because it has cause to believe that the compliance issues identified below may constitute violations of the Colorado Air Pollution Prevention and Control Act ("the Act") and its implementing regulations. Please be aware that you are responsible for complying with applicable State air pollution requirements and that there are substantial penalties for failing to do so. Pursuant to the enforcement authority provided the Division by § 25-7-115, C.R.S., any person who violates the Act, its implementing regulations or any permit issued thereunder may be issued an order for compliance that can include permit revocation and assessment of penalties of up to $15,000 per day of such violation in accordance with § 25-7-122, C.R.S. The issuance of this Compliance Advisory does not in any way limit or preclude the Division from pursuing additional enforcement options concerning this inspection/review. Also, this Compliance Advisory does not constitute a bar to enforcement action for violations not specifically addressed in this Compliance Advisory. Failure to respond to this Compliance Advisory by the date indicated at the end of this Compliance Advisory may be considered by the Division in the subsequent COLORADO Air Pollution Control Div tstan enforcement action and the assessment of penalties. Furthermore, the Division's enforcement process contemplates a full and final resolution of the compliance issues herein addressed, and those that may result from further review, in a timely manner. If at any time throughout the process of reaching such a resolution the Division determines that the Parties cannot agree to the dispositive facts, compliance requirements and/or penalty assessments (if any) associated with this Compliance Advisory, or a resultant enforcement action, the Division may exercise its full enforcement authority allowed under the law. DCP Midstream, LP ("DCP") owns and operates the Mewbourn Natural Gas Processing Plant located in 35409 Weld County Road 18 in Weld County, Colorado ("Facility"). The Facility and the following equipment are subject to the terms and conditions of Colorado Air Quality Control Statutes; Colorado Air Quality Control Commission ("AQCC") Regulations; and the Compliance Order on Consent in Case No. 2015-073, effective June 21, 2016 ("COC"), entered into between the Division and DCP. The following equipment is subject to Permit Number 09WE1136, Issuance 2, issued to DCP on June 28, 2012 ("Permit Number 09WE1136 Issuance 2"): AIRS Point Facility Equipment ID Point Description 101 C-211 Caterpillar, Model G379NA, SN: 726641, 330 HP RICE 102 C-167 Waukesha, Model L7044GSI, SN: C13852-1, 1,680 HP RICE 103 C-179 Waukesha, Model L7042GSI, SN: 240410, 1,478 HP RICE 104 C-129 Waukesha, Model L7042 GU, SN: 286822, 896 HP RICE 105 C-134 Waukesha, Model L7042GU, SN: 285300, 896 HP RICE 106 C-130 Waukesha, Model L7042GSI, SN: 339839, 1,478 HP RICE 107 C-131 Waukesha, Model L7042GSI, SN: 397541, 1,478 HP RICE 108 F017 Facility Equipment Leaks 109 LO Condensate loadout 110 TANKS Four (4) tanks for storage of stabilized natural gas condensate 111 C0170 Solar, Model Taurus 60, SN: TC10559, natural gas fired combustion turbine 112 C0180 Solar, Model Taurus 60, SN: TC10560, natural gas fired combustion turbine AyCOLORADO All Polhalon Contgol Rlvtzlon AIRS Point Facility Equipment ID Point Description 113 C250 Caterpillar, Model G3608TALE, SN: BEN00563, 2,370 HP RICE 114 C251 Caterpillar, Model G3608TALE, SN: BEN00565, 2,370 HP RICE 115 C252 Caterpillar, Model G3608TALE, SN: BEN00567, 2,370 HP RICE 116 C253 Caterpillar, Model G3608TALE, SN: BEN00572, 2,370 HP RICE 117 C254 Caterpillar, Model G3608TALE, SN: BEN00571, 2,370 HP RICE 118 G1650 Solar, Model Taurus 70, SN: TG09548, natural gas fired combustion turbine 119 G1670 Solar, Model Taurus 70, SN: TG09549, natural gas fired combustion turbine 120 AM001 Precision Pipe Et Vessel, LLC, Model T502, SN: 2381-9089 Natural gas sweetening system 121 H776 Optimized Process Furnace, Inc., Model 200, SN: J091036, natural gas fired amine regeneration reboiler 122 D-931 Exterran, SN: 8907, Triethylene glycol (TEG) Natural gas dehydration system 123 H771 Two (2) Devco, Model HeliFlow, SN: 3431-3, natural gas fired hot oil heaters. Only one heater to be operated at a time, the other is to be used as a backup. 124 TO701 Anguil Environmental Services, Inc., Model 200, SN: 14808, regenerative thermal oxidizer Permit Number 09WE1136, Issuance 3, was issued to DCP Midstream, LP on October 21, 2016. I. ALLEGED VIOLATIONS AND FACTS On September 23, 2016, Stephen Riley, of the Division, inspected the Facility. Based on Mr. Riley's inspection, and a review of records related to the Facility, the Division has identified the following compliance issues: A. Pursuant to Permit Number 09WE1136 Issuance 2, Condition 5, DCP is required to limit emissions from AIRS Point 108 (fugitive emissions, F017) to 31.73 tons per year (tpy) of VOC on a rolling 12 -month basis. DCP exceeded the annual VOC emission limit for AIRS Point 108 for the rolling 12 -month periods ending June 2015 through August 2016, as follows: COLORADO Air pollution ConrrM r,ws.,on Rolling 12- month period ending Reported tpy Jun -15 42.35 Jul -15 42.39 Aug -15 42.43 Sep -15 42.47 Oct -15 42.51 Nov -15 42.53 Dec -15 42.51 Jan -16 42.49 Feb -16 42.59 Mar -16 42.57 Apr -16 42.55 May -16 42.53 Jun -16 42.20 Jul -16 41.87 Aug -16 41.54 DCP exceeded the annual VOC emission limit for AIRS Point 108 for the rolling 12 -month periods ending June 2015 through August 2016, in violation of Permit Number 09WE1136, Condition 5.' B. Pursuant to Permit Number 09WE1136 Issuance 2, Condition 33, DCP must demonstrate compliance with the requirements of this permit by following the operating and maintenance ((&rM) plan and record keeping format approved by the Division. The approved O&tM plan for AIRS Point 102 (engine C-167) states that DCP shall establish the catalyst differential pressure (dP) baseline during each initial compliance and portable analyzer test. DCP must monitor and record the catalyst dP monthly and must maintain catalyst dP within (plus or minus) 2 inches of water column from the baseline. DCP failed to maintain catalyst dP within (plus or minus) 2 inches of water column from the baseline for AIRS Point 102 for the months of November 2015, December 2015, and January 2016, in violation of Permit Number 09WE1136, Condition 33. C. Pursuant to Permit Number 09WE1136, Condition 33, DCP must demonstrate compliance with the requirements of this permit by following the 08M plan and record keeping format approved by the Division. The approved O&tM plan for AIRS Point 110 (TANKS) states that the thief hatch seals shall be inspected for integrity annually and 1 DCP submitted an APEN to the Division on July 27, 2015 requesting an increase to the annual permitted emission limit for AIRS Point 108 from 31.73 tpy to 50.79 tpy of VOC. Issuance 3 of Permit Number 09WE1136 with the increased annual emission limit for AIRS Point 108 of 50.8 tpy of VOC was issued to DCP on October 21, 2016. COLORADO Air Pollution Control Division replaced as necessary; pressure relief valves (PRV) shall be inspected annually for proper operation and replaced as necessary; and PRVs shall be set to release at a pressure that will ensure flashing, working and breathing losses (as applicable) are routed to the control device under normal operating conditions. DCP failed to perform an inspection on the thief hatch seals and PRVs during 2015, in violation of Permit Number 09WE1136, Condition 33. During the inspection on September 23, 2016, emissions were observed with an IR camera from the PRVs on two of the four tanks, demonstrating that DCP failed to ensure that PRVs were set to release at a pressure that ensured flashing, working and breathing losses were routed to the control device under normal operating conditions, in violation of Permit Number 09WE1136, Condition 33. D. Pursuant to COC Paragraph 13, repairs shall be completed on the seven (7) components remaining on Delay of Repair no later than the next process unit shutdown before the end of 2016. DCP completed repairs on the seven (7) components remaining on Delay of Repair on December 28, 2016. However, a process unit shutdown on all units occurred from September 12 to September 15, 2016. DCP failed to repair the seven (7) components remaining on Delay of Repair no later than the next process unit shutdown, in violation of COC Paragraph 13. E. Pursuant to COC Paragraph 14, DCP was required to complete any necessary repairs to ensure the PRVs on the condensate storage tanks are operated to ensure flashing, working and breathing losses (as applicable) are routed to the control device under normal operating conditions by September 19, 2016. Venting was observed during the inspection on September 23, 2016, demonstrating that DCP failed to make necessary repairs by September 19, 2016, in violation of COC Paragraph 14. DCP repaired the PRVs on September 26, 2016. It is important to resolve the above -referenced issues as soon as possible. Therefore, the Division encourages DCP to immediately identify those compliance issues that are not in dispute and to rectify those issues before the upcoming Compliance Advisory meeting. In accordance with 5 25-7-115(3)(a), C.R.S., the Compliance Advisory meeting will be held within thirty (30) days of the Division's issuance of the Compliance Advisory in this matter. The Division also requests that DCP provide the Division with a brief written response to the alleged violations ("Source Response"). The Source Response should identify the undisputed compliance issues and, if an alleged violation is disputed, the basis for the dispute. The Division requests that DCP provide the Source Response, to the attention of Stephen Riley, no 1J!1 COLORADO All Pollution Control Envunan later than ten business days before the Compliance Advisory meeting. At the upcoming meeting, the Division will confirm the actions taken to rectify the undisputed compliance issues and proceed with unresolved matters as outlined below. If you have any questions regarding this Compliance Advisory, the Division's enforcement processes, or any related issues, please refer to the APCD Enforcement Manual located at https: / /www.colorado.gov/pacific/sites/default/files/AP- EnforcementandComplianceGuide.pdf and/or contact the Division personnel identified below. II. COMPLIANCE ADVISORY MEETING DCP is requested to contact the Division and schedule a meeting to: ➢ Discuss the disputed Compliance Advisory issues and answer any remaining questions you may have; ➢ Submit information necessary to successfully show that the deficiencies and noncompliance issues (or any portion of them) are not violations of Colorado's air pollution laws; and ➢ Establish a mutually acceptable schedule and guidelines for the full and final resolution of any remaining deficiencies and noncompliance issues in a timely manner. Please contact the compliance officer identified below by no later than July 13, 2017 to schedule a meeting with the Division to discuss the Compliance Advisory. The Division currently anticipates that the meeting will take place during the week of July 24, 2017. Lydia Jordan, Enforcement Advisor (303-692-3399) cc: Shannon McMillan, APCD Jennie Morse, APCD Chris Laplante, APCD Arch Crouse, APCD Michael Stovern, EPA (Region VIII) Stephen Riley, APCD Jen Mattox, APCD Heather Wuollet, APCD Tom Roan, Attorney General's Office File COLORADO for ➢olltttion. Cont.ol Dlvuiat\ Hello