The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20193104.tiffAugust 5, 2019 Petitioner: CAMELOT STORAGE LLC 9220 W 26TH AVE LAKEWOOD. CO 80215-1627 CLERK TO THE BOARD PHONE (970) 400-4226 FAX (970) 336-7233 WEBS ITE: www.weldgov.com 1150 O STREET P.O. BOX 758 GREELEY CO 80632 Agent (if applicable): RE: THE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 2019. WELD COUNTY. COLORADO NOTICE OF DECISION Docket 2019-3104 Appeal 2008224783 Hearing 8/5/2019 10:30 AM Dear Petitioner: On the day indicated above, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County Colorado convened and acting as the Board of Equalization. pursuant to C.R.S. §39-8-101 et seq.. considered petition for appeal of the Weld County Assessor's valuation of your property described above. for the year 2019. Account # Decision The Assessment and valuation is set as follows: Actual Value as Actual Value as Set by Determined by Assessor Board R7052198 Adjust - Denied in Part S1,730.373 $1,559,454 A denial of a petition, in whole or in part, by the Board of Equalization must be appealed within thirty (30) days of the date the denial is mailed to you. You must select only one of the following three (3) options for appeal: 1. Appeal to Board of Assessment Appeals: You have the right to appeal the County Board of Equalization's decision to the Colorado Board of Assessment Appeals. A hearing before that Board will be the last time you may present testimony or exhibits or other evidence. or call witnesses in support of your valuation. If the decision of the Board of Assessment Appeals is further appealed to the Court of Appeals pursuant to C.R.S. §39-8-108(2), only the record of proceedings from your hearing before the Board of Assessment Appeals and your legal brief are filed with the appellate court. All appeals to the Board of Assessment Appeals filed after August 10, 2019, MUST comply with the following provisions of C.R.S. §39-8-107(5): (5)(a)(I) On and after August 10. 2019, in addition to any other requirements under law, any petitioner appealing either a valuation of rent -producing commercial real property to the Board of Assessment Appeals 00 9-3io4 pursuant to C.R.S. §39-8-108(1) or a denial of an abatement of taxes pursuant to C.R.S. §39-10-114 shall provide to the County Board of Equalization or to the Board of County Commissioners of the County in the case of an abatement, and not to the Board of Assessment Appeals, the following information, if applicable: (A) Actual annual rental income for two full years including the base year for the relevant property tax year: (B) Tenant reimbursements for two full years including the base year for the relevant property tax year: (C) Itemized expenses for two full years including the base year for the relevant property tax year: and (D) Rent roll data. including the name of any tenants. the address. unit, or suite number of the subject property, lease start and end dates, option terms, base rent, square footage leased, and vacant space for two full years including the base year for the relevant property tax year. (II) The petitioner shall provide the information required by subparagraph (I) of this paragraph (a) within ninety days after the appeal has been filed with the Board of Assessment Appeals. (b)(I) The Assessor.. the County Board of Equalization. or the Board of County Commissioners of the County. as applicable, shall,. upon request made by the petitioner, provide to a petitioner who has filed an appeal with the Board of Assessment Appeals not more than ninety days after receipt of the petitioner's request. the following information: (A) All of the underlying data used by the county in calculating the value of the subject property that is being appealed, including the capitalization rate for such property: and (B) The names of any commercially available and copyrighted publications used in calculating the value of the subject property. (II) The paly providing the information to the petitioner pursuant to subparagraph (I) of this paragraph (b) shall redact all confidential information contained therein. (c) If a petitioner fails to provide the information required by subparagraph (I) of paragraph (a) of this subsection (5) by the deadline specified in subparagraph (II) of said paragraph (a). the County may move the Board of Assessment Appeals to compel disclosure and to issue appropriate sanctions for noncompliance with such order. The motion may be made directly by the County Attorney and shall be accompanied by a certification that the County Assessor or the County Board of Equalization has in good faith conferred or attempted to confer with such petitioner in an effort to obtain the information without action by the Board of Assessment Appeals. If an order compelling disclosure is issued under this paragraph (c) and the petitioner fails to comply with such order, the Board of Assessment Appeals may make such orders in regard to the noncompliance as are just and reasonable under the circumstances. including an order dismissing the action or the entry of a judgment by default against the petitioner. Interest due the taxpayer shall cease to accrue as of the date the order compelling disclosure is issued. and the accrual of interest shall resume as of the date the contested information has been provided by the taxpayer. Appeals to the Board of Assessment Appeals must be made on forms furnished by that Board. and must be mailed or celivered within thirty (30) days of the date the denial by the Board of Equalization is mailed to you The address and telephone number of the Board of Assessment Appeals are: Board of Assessment Appeals 1313 Sherman Street. Room 315 Denver, Colorado 80203 Telephone Number: (303) 864-7710 Email: baa@state.co.us Fees for Appeal to the Board of Assessment Appeals: A taxpayer representing himself is not charged for the first two (2) appeals to the Board of Assessment Appeals. A taxpayer represented by an attorney or agent must pay a fee of $101.25 per appeal. OR 2. Appeal to District Court: You have the right to appeal the decision of the Board of Equalization to the District Court of the county wherein your property is located: in this case that is Weld County District Court. A hearing before The District Court will be the last time you may present testimony or exhibits or other evidence, or call witnesses in support of your valuation. If the decision of the District Court is further appealed to the Court of Appeals pursuant to C.R.S. §39-8-108(1), the rules of Colorado appellate review and C.R.S. §24-4-106(9), govern the process. OR 3. Binding Arbitration: You have the right to submit your case to binding arbitration. If you choose this option. the arbitrator's decision is final and you have no further right to appeal your current valuation. C.R.S. §39-8-108.5 governs this process. The arbitration process involves the following: Select an Arbitrator: You must notify the Board of Equalization that you will pursue arbitration. You and the Board of Equalization will select an arbitrator from the official list of qualified people. If you cannot agree on an arbitrator. the District Court of the county in which the property is located (i.e. Weld) will select the arbitrator. b. Arbitration Hearing Procedure: Arbitration hearings are held within sixty (60) days from the date the arbitrator is selected, and are set by the arbitrator. Both you and the Board of Equalization are entitled to participate in the hearing. The hearing is informal. The arbitrator has the authority to issue subpoenas for witnesses. books, records documents and other evidence pertaining to the value of the property. The arbitrator also has the authority to administer oaths. and determine all questions of law and fact presented to him. The arbitration hearing may be confidential and closed to the public if you and the Board of Equalization agree. The arbitrator's decision must be delivered personally or by registered mail within ten (10) days of the arbitration hearing. c. Fees and Expenses: The arbitrator's fees and expenses are agreed upon by you and the Board of Equalization. In the case of residential real property. the fess may not exceed $150.00 per case. For cases other than residential real property, the arbitrator's total fees and expenses are agreed to by you and Board of Equalization. but are paid by the parties as ordered by the arbitrator. If you have questions concerning the above information please call me at (970) 400-4226. Very truly yours. BOARD OF EQUALIZATION ;Y7:w Esther E. Gesick Clerk to the Board Weld County Board of Commissioners and Board of Equalization cc: Brenda Dones. Weld County Assessor Real Property Valuation Appeal Account #'s R7051998, R7052098 & R7052198 Camelot RV & Boat Storage 4075 Camelot Circle Longmont, CO 80504 Table of Contents SECTION 1: Statement of Valuation SECTIONII: I: Sequence of Events SECTION III: Unimproved Land Prices of Like Facilities SECTION IV: Historical Data SECTION V: Income Approach to Value SECTION VI: Comparison Approach to Value SECTION VII: Summation EXHIBITS: 1) Appraiser's email asking for 2017-18 Income Statements 2) Appraiser's email of 24 July 3) Land prices of like facilities throughout the area 4) Tax records of Camelot RV Storage property 5) Camelot RV Storage financials 2014 -2nd QTR 2017 6) Tax records of Beacon Storage 7) Tax records on Larimer & Adams County properties 8) 2017 and 2018 Income Statements 9) Aerial photo of 1-25 Business Park 10) ALTA Survey 11) Aerial view of Camelot property 12) Valuation computations 13) Garage building construction receipts Page 1 of 26 SIECTIM El STATEMENT OF VALUATION We disagree with the Assessor's valuation of our real property. It is our opinion the value of our real property, Account #'s R7051998, R7052098 & R7052198, is One Million Nine Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,900,000.0II0) and we ask this Board of Review to so enter it's judgement accordingly We arrive at this figure using the Income Approach (Section VI) and the Comparison,Approach (Section VII) as per Title 39 CRS SECTS© OF SEQUENCE OF EVENTS May 2019*** Received valuation notices totaling $ 3,848,381 00, a 142% increase from the prior year ($ 1,589,389.00), Met with Millie Channell of the appraiser's office, when asked how she came to the valuations assigned she replied (paraphrasing) "I took the purchase price of $ 3 5M added the construction loan of $ 400K and spread that amount across the property". I asked, "What about the value of the business, we purchased a very successful business with that $ 3 9M also?" Her reply "Yes' It has always been a very successful business though the purchase price is only allocated to the land" We went on to explain her calculations on the amount of asphalt on Lot 2 were incorrect and that the $ 400K not only built a garage building it was used on numerous repairs & maintenance We informed her the garage building was valued incorrectly at $ 324K, it cost us $ 199.5K to build. June 2019*** Millie sent me an email (Exhibit 1) to inform me she could also approach the valuation based on our income if I would send her our 2017 & 2018 Income Statements, which I promptly did. However, based on results and subsequent conversations the income approach was not material to their position on the value of the property. Colo Case Law Montrose Properties, LTD v. Colorado Board of Assessment Appeals, 738 P.2d 396 (Colo App. 1987), affirms that the assessor must give appropriate consideration to all required approaches to value. July 2019*** We received new notices of valuation as a result of our meeting, she reduced Lot 2 by the amount of the excess asphalt measurement Her and Wade's Page 2 of 26 position was/is that the fact there is an RV Storage business on the property makes NO difference as to the value of the property. "The property is worth $ 3.85M even if the RV Storage is not there" My question here is, if that is true then why ask for the Income statements? they clearly show that is not true! There were a few additional telephonic conversations with the Chief appraiser Wade Melies & Millie Channell throughout the month and then the morning of 24 July I received a call from Millie (she was in Wade's office as was the Deputy Chief). Millie told us they had been reworking the numbers around and they got us down to taxes of $ 86K vs the $ 102K originally stated Exhibit 2 is the breakdown of their calculations. Even though they did reevaluate the valuations and lower them, the valuation still seemed artificially high to us. The tax burden imposed on us by these artificially high valuations presents an extreme economic hardship on our business and even threatens our survivability. Accordingly, we are now appealing at the County Board level SECTlt? 0j NON: UNIMPROVED LAND PRICES OF LIKE FACILITIES Attached hereto as Exhibit 3, are the 2019 land valuations of eleven (11) Weld County "like" storage facilities in the vicinity of Camelot Storage and two each from Larimer & Boulder Counties At a brief glance it becomes very apparent, the per acre valuation of Camelot is extremely out of line with like facilities even in the more expensive counties of Larimer & Boulder. SEC`ll°BCN IV. HISTORICAL DATA Although the appraisers claim the sale price of the business entity is truly ONLY the value of the real property with no consideration given for the business, the risk of investing $ 3 9M, entrepreneurial prowess, etc., in 2010 when Camelot sold to Mr Mark Stonehocker for $ 2.5M the very next tax period, 2011-12, the taxes went down and continued to go down every period to a low of $ 1 419M in 2015-16 In 2017-18 there was an increase, though only to $ 1.589M, still well below the $ 2.5M selling price paid in 2010 In general, in the past 10 years there has been tremendous growth in Northern Colorado and yet the taxes continually went down??? Mark did put approximately 3 acres in agricultural classification (that property to the North which is totally engulfed by easements see Exhibit 10), however, that does not come close to explaining this entire course of valuations Page 3 of 26 Please refer to Exhibits 4A & B for tax history charts on this property The appraiser's stance, "The entire selling price of an RV Storage facility is the value of ONLY the real estate", does not seem to align with the way it has traditionally been done, it does not seem logical and nor does it seem equitable Exhibit 5, financials from Mr Stonehocker for years 2014 through the first half of 2017, clearly show, by the appraiser's methodology (dividing income by a 7% CAP rate) the business entity (land & business) was worth significantly more than $ 1 589M (the value assigned to the Camelot property in 2017-18). Theincomes shown on Mr. Stonehocker's financials, Exhibit 5, did not justify the $ 3 5M sales price at our desired ROI of 10% however we knew we could increase the number of units stored on the property by hands on management, organizing the layout of the property more efficiently, we were able to obtain very favorable long term SBA financing and that Weld County regulations on where RV Storage facilities could be built was changing, becoming more limited, so, we decided over paying the market value somewhat was worth it We were told by Weld County Planning Dept., during our due diligence phase, "..soon, you won't be able to build an RV Storage facility anywhere except along a state highway, the regulations are changing" and that has come to pass. I have also included the tax history chart for Beacon Storage, a mini warehouse storage facility, also located in the I-25 Business Park and it too shows the selling price has not been entirely allocated to the real estate (Exhibit 6) Tax history charts, Exhibit 7A & B, for two RV facilities that sold rather recently in Larimer and Adams County respectively, clearly show that appraisers universally do not feel the entire selling price should be allocated solely to the value of the underlying real estate. SECTION VB• INCOME APPROACH TO VALUE Please note, the income and associated expenses for the management of Mead Garages has been removed from the 2017 & 2018 Income Statements provided as Exhibit 8A & B. The management of Mead Garages is performed by U Storage Holdings LLC (Lief Jensen & David Lee), and has nothing to do with the Camelot property My partner and I, U Storage Holdings LLC, brought this income stream to the table and decided to run it through Camelot for the soles purpose of increasing the returns/profits to Camelot's investors We, as U Storage Holdings Page 4 of 26 LLC own 80% of Camelot. This income has nothing to do with Camelot nor the value of Camelot's real estate. Camelot RV Storage was purchased June 9, 2017 so the 2017 Income statement is for six months Adjusting for an annual basis, the income per the Weld County appraiser's office methodology (divide the income by 7%) derives a value of $ 1,931,285.00, see Exhibit 8A. The 2018 Income statement, Exhibit 8B, by the same methodology derives a price of $ 1,869,586 00 SECTOi N VOL COMPARISON APPROACH TO VALUE We feel the Best comparison to our unimproved "land/dirt" we find in our own Business Park Exhibit 9 shows our property highlighted in green and two vacant unimproved lots directly across the street, Weld County acct #'s R7054198 and R7053598. The 2019 valuation assigned to these two unimproved lots is $ 76,666.00 and $ 61,332 00 per acre respectively. The ALTA survey of the Camelot property, Exhibit 10, shows the numerous easements dissecting the property which severely hampers the ability to safely build on these lots and negatively impacts the value Exhibit 11 shows the measurements of the land on the North portion of the lots which is drastically reduced in value because of the solid easements in that area Additionally, a large portion of the subdivision drainage flows to this area of our property via the utility easement shown in green on the survey It is our opinion this land has marginal worth/value, we have assigned this ground a value of $ 32,670 00 per acre ($ .75 per sq. ft.) even though this figure still seems too high Setting this ground aside for now I will address the remainder of Lots 2, 3 & 4. Lot 2, acct. # R7051998, sits significantly below street grade, has additional issues with easements and is near two gas valve sets, for these reasons, we feel this ground has significantly less value than the lots across the street. We have assigned an unimproved land value of $ 55,000.00 per acre to the remainder of Lot 2 By the same logic we have compared our property to the lots across the street and have determined a value of $ 60,000.00 an acre to Lot 3 and a value of $ 68,000 00 per acre for Lot 4, after the deduction for the easement ground along the North property line Now to the valuation of the improvements on the property. I will be working from Exhibit 2, (appraiser's computation sheet), the email from Millie Channell Page 5 of 26 dated 24 July 2019 I have addressed the land value above and will come back to that later showing my calculations in Exhibit 12, so I will skip the first couple of paragraphs and address only those items of the improvement valuations I take exception with First there is the value placed on the garage building we built, it is listed as $ 324K and we built that building for $ 199.5K. We have provided our bank draw sheets and receipts as Exhibit 13. It is our opinion that our actual construction cost is the True value of that building and we know that is how the appraiser's office has handled costs in the past. My partner, David Lee, built Recreation Storage Solutions I & II (RSS I & II), RV storage facilities, and that is exactly how Mr. Wade Melies handled the valuation of the garages & canopies there. Second, also on Lot 4, the correct measurement of the asphalt on this lot is 146,738 sq. ft. versus 160,000 sq ft Finally, the asphalt price per square foot is assigned three different values, different for each lot The asphalt on this property was installed in the same 12 month timeframe and is uniformly in less than average condition Accordingly, I will use the value assigned to the asphalt on Lot 4 of $ .72 sq. ft. ($ 114,714/160,00 sq. ft. = $ .72 per sql ft.) in my calculations of improvement values We concur with the remainder of the values assigned by the appraisers. Exhibit 12 shows and explains mylcomputations in detail for the comparison approach to value SECTBON VB9: SUMMATION We have shown The Income Approach to value for 2017 and 2018, using the assessor's CAP rate of 7%, which resulted in values of $ 1,931,285 00 and $ 1,869,586.00 respectively When comparing our land values to those of like facilities (Exhibit 3), common sense tells you our land is valued significantly too high. Our analysis of the land and improvements by the Comparison Approach to value resulted in a real property value of $ 2,040,022.00. However, it is our unwavering opinion the true value of our property is $ 1,900,000 00 when everything is considered, and we request a value in that amount be made of record Page 6 of 26 Millie Channel) <n)cihanneil@weldgov.corn> 4075 Camelot Circle R7052198 R7052098 R7051998 'r, liefdoomcast.net <iefd@cerncast.net.3- Good morning Lief, 6!3/2019 8:13 AM I forgot to mention in our meeting that another approach to value is the income approach for commercial properties_ When you send the appraisal for the properties, VOL can also send the income and expenses for 2017 and 2018 and I can work up the income approach_ Thank you for your time. Mill e •1l itt ie eh Properly Appraiser Commercial Division Weld County Assessor's Office (970) 400-3685 :nchanneU )1'.'eidgov cent Confidentiality Notice: This e.`ectronic transmission and any attached documents or other writings are intended only for the person cr entity to which it is addressed and may ccntarr. inforrrat-on that rs ►prrvi eged, confidential cr otherwise protected from disclosure. if you have received this communication :n error, pease rrnmed!ate.y notify sender by return a-mai' and destroy the communication Any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action concerning the contents of this communication or any attachments by anyone other than the named recipient is strictly prohibited_ • imageO01 _jpg (4 K6) Page 7 of 26 Millie Channel! cnichannell@weldgovecom> RE: Millie-- taxes LIEF JENSEN c field4conicast.net-> Good morning Lief, 7125/2019 10:41 AM This was onginally platted as industrial, but this is all commercial accounts now. t fixed the account that said industrial. All accounts have land abstract cores of 2130 which is special purpose -land The proposed value for the land would be 52.54/sf R7051998 R7O52098 87052198 2019 proposed 2019 proposed 2019 proposed land 5558,19D 5728,911 5600,677 imps $106,983 5246,462 5958,777 total 5665,173 5975, 373 51,559,454 $3,200,000 On R7051998, this has 40,500 sf of Asphalt at 549.183 and 144,500 sf of Crushed Asphalt at 557,800 for a total of imps=5106,983 On 87052098, this has 221,400 sf of Asphalt at 5246,462 which is the total of the imps on this account. On R7052198. this has 160,000 sf of Asphalt at 5114,714 and 670 sf Concrete at 5723. Total of Asphalt and Concrete is 5115,437_ [Remember this is where it was on as cost override and would in crease your va, ue when removed the cost override, which I didn`t doj. The office is valued at 5634,777 ;this includes the 5115,437 asphalt and concrete] and the Mini Whse is valued at 5324,000_ Totaling up the improvements for this account = $958, 777. Let me know if you have any further questions_ Thanks, Millie It iliic CfiaitsteUU Property Appraiser Commercial Division Weld County Assessor's Office (970) 400-3685 i uc_haa el! ate elcisot.'.cou1 Page 8 of 25 RV & Boat Storage Facilities Weld County Account # Brighton Outdoor Storage . R6785426 TYPE: ('ODE Description Price Per Acre Actual Value Acres Improvement 2230 Special 'c'utposc-Irnpros'ements S I , I9K.5I WOO 0 Land 2130 ._ Special Purpose -Land $ 132,076.00 $ 8,942.18 14.77 [.and 4127 )ry Farm Land -Agricultural $ 3,554.00 19.37 +' Land 4167 , Waste Land fr $ 7.00 0 84 butts 4. $ 1,334, 1 55.00 34.98 Weld County Account # Affordable 14I` Storage I,1.( R5804786 TYPE CODE Description Actual Value Acres Price Per Acre Improvement 1212 ,Single Family Residential Improvements $ 11,279 00 0 Improvement 2230 Special Purpose -Improvements $ 606.201.00 0 Land 1135 1 Manufactured Housing -Land _ $ 49,984 OQ 3 Land 2130 Special Purpose -Land $ 449,853.00 27 $ 16,661.22 Totals $ 1.117,317 00 30 Weld County Account # II('GE RV 84913607 I 1 1'F. CODE Description Price Per Acre Actual Value Acres 1 mprOVernum 2?20 Offices -improvements $ 122,081.00 0 Land 2130 Special Purpose -Land $ 359,3 70.00 $ 35,937.00 10 am land Totals 4167 t)ry l- arni land -A gric ttlttiral Waste Land $ 2,961.00 18.843 25.00 $ 484,43 7.00 3 31 843 Weld County REILLY CHRISTOPHER B Account # 88944385 A TYPE ('ODE. Description Actual Value Acres Price Per Acre r(mprovcment 2235 Warehouse/Storage-IMPS $ 118,787.00 0 improvement 4277 Farm/Ranch Residence -IMPS $ 214,396.00 0 Improvement 4279 r � Farm/Ranch Support BLDGS $ 49.785.00 0 Im (� rovement 4280 All Other AG IMPS - $ 26.091 00 0 Lan d _ 2135 -Grazing Warehouse/,Storage-Land $ 487,872.00 $ 43,560.00 11.2 Land 1147 Land -Agricultural $ 653.00 35 736 L and 1, 67 Waste Land $ 17.00 2.014 ( oink$ 897,601 00 48.95 Weld County Account # Rest Stop Storage R5330308 1 1 Pt ('ODE Description Actual Value Acres Price Per Acre Irnprovenier.t 2'35 $ 90,429 00 0 Land _ 2135 _Warehouse/Storage-IMPS Warehouse/Storage-Land $ 978,358.00 22.46 $ 43,560.02 3'utals S 1,068.787 00 22.46 'Weld County FREDERICK WEST RV STORAGE LLC Account # R7734099 (0[)1 Description Actual Value Acres Price Per Acre ( fltin(Yy ernelit 2230 Special Purpose -Improvements $ 23,310 00 0 Land 1313 Special Purpose -Land $ 600,710.00 4.056 $ 148,104.04 Totals $ 624,020.00 4.056 Page 9 of 26 Weld County Account # Recreational Storage Solutions I.L.(- R5805686 A TYPE C'O1)L Description Actual Value Acres Price Per Acre Improvement 7220 Offices -Improvements S 226,729.00 0 Improvement -Y215 Warehouse/Storage-IMPS $ 660,380 00 0 I.an l 2135 _Warehouse/Storage-Land $ 622,908.00 13 $ 55,438 85 totals _ $ 1,510,017 00 13 _ Weld County Account # Recreational Storage Solutions2 LEK R56783936 '1 IIE COD F: Description Actual Value Acres Price Per Acre Improvement 2220 Offices -Improvements $ 1,768,009.00 0 tin novement 2235 Warehouse/Storage-IMPS $ 626,928.00 0 I indi 2135 i Special Purpose -Land $ 720.705.00 a 15 041 $ 47,916.03 Totals e $ 3,115,642.00 15.041 Weld County Account # t am Hot Pik Sturagt 1.1 ( I.ot 2 R7052198 1% PE CODE Description Price Per Acre Actual Value Acres Improvement r2270 Offices -Improvements $ 637,790 00 0 Improvement 1235 Warehouse/Storage-IMPS $ 324,000.00 0 Land 2130 Special Purpose -Land $ 768,583.00 $ 141,569.90 5.429 Totals $ 1,730,373 00 5.429 , Weld County Account # Middle LOT ('aiiidot RV Storage i.T.C Lot 3 R7052098 1 YPF. CODF: Description Actual Value Acres Price Per Acre Impro\ intent 2230 Special Purpose -Improvements $ 246,462.00 0 ( .and 2130 Special Purpose -Land $ 932,662.00 $ 178,980.57 6.588 • Totals . $ 1, l 79,124 00 I 6.588 Weld County Account # West LOT ( ,1rrat'lrlt R\ Suit -age II t I cif 4 87051998 TYPE: ('ODE Description Actual Value Acres Price Per Acre Improvement 3212 Contracting/Service-IMPS $ 106,983 00 0 1.and 21.?)0 i Special Purpose -Land S 714,220.00 $ 141,569.87 5.045 fotals $ 821,203.00 5.045 Weld County Account # Long Shadow l4v and Boat Storage 1(4488406 West LOT TYPF' (CODE Description Actual Value Acres Price Per Acre Iniptuvemeiit _ 2235 Warehouse/Storage-IMP $ 180,485.00 0 improvement 4279 Farm Ranch Support Hidgs $ 2,429.00 0 Land _ 115 I Manufactured Housing -Land $ 6,720.00 0.11 Land• 2135 a Warehouse/Storage-Land $ 217,713.00 3.57 $ 60,984.03 Land 4147 Grazing Land -Agricultural , $ 39.00 2.24 Land 4167 Waste Land $ 23.00 2.75 "royals I $ 407,409.00 8.67 Weld County Account # Long Shathn% Itv and Boat Storage R4488206 .I1Pi 0,(:ODE Description Actual Value Acres Price Per Acre Intpruvetnertt 2235 Warehouse/Storage-IMP $ 65,707.00 0 Lind 2135 Warehouse/Storage-Land $ 80,499.00 1.32 $ 60,984.09 Land 4147 Grazing I .and -Agricultural $ 7.00 0.39 Totals s $ 146,213.00 1.71 Page 10 of 26 Weld County Account # At ord:dile Itv Storage 1 R5804786 , TYPE CODE Description Actual Value _ Acres Price Per Acre Single Famil> Residential Improvements 1212 Improvement $ 11,279.00 Special Purpose Imt)ro emenLs 2230 Improvement $ 606,201 00 Nlanuthetuied Housing -Land i 135 Land $ 49,984,00 3 $ 16,661.33 Special Purpose Land 2130 Land $ 449,853.00 27 S 16,661.22 'l totals 4 $ 1,117,317.00 30 Larimer County Account It Firehouse South Lot R 1648580 T NAT CODE Description Actual Value Acres Price Per Acre Improvement ?227 Com/Res $ [67,600.00 (l I nrpt oveinent 2224 4 Warehouse $ 9.608,700 00 0 I and 22211. Land $ 854,100.00 12.25 a $ 69,722 45 I aid 22271. a Land $ 69,600.00 1 $ 69,600 00 Totals $ 10,700,000.00 13.25 Latimer County Account # Firehouse North Lot R054)6753 .t N PI.. CODE Description Actual Value Acres Price Per Acre 1inpro‘einent 2224 Warehouse $ 4,651,400.00 0 I.arid 22241, Warehouse $ 248,600.00 7.22 $ 34,432 13 Totals $ 4,900,000.00 7.22 Boulder County Account # ,Anderson Storage R0514103 4 1 03 1 VI'i ; _ , Price Per Acre CODE Description Actual Value Acres Single Family Residence- Land 1 1 12 Single Family Residence- Land $ 230,600.00 Single Family Residence- improvements 1212 Warehouse $ 318,500 00 Warehouse Storage Land 2135 Land $ 1,334,400 00 15 094 $ 88,405 9') Warehouse Storage- improvements 2235 Land $ 1,316,500 00 Totals $ 3,200,000.00 15 094 Boulder County Account # Sugar Mill Storage R0503765 "I \"J'F: A ('ODE: Description Actual Value Acres Price Per Acre Manufacturing Land 3 115 Land $ 280,000 00 40 $ 7,000.00 Manufacturing improvements 32 15 Warehouse $ 240,000.00 a Fouls $ 520,000.00 40 1 t Page 11 of 26 Camelot RV Storage Weld County (125 Business Park) Property Address: 4075 Camelot Or Year 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 Lot 2 R7051998 $938,884.00 $287,199.00 $287,199.00 $253,939.00 $253,939.00 $263,289.00 $303,821.00 $440,778.00 $440,778.00 $475,745.00 $475,745.00 $365,865.00 Lot 3 R7052098 $1,179,124.00 $571,990.00 $571,990.00 $551,661.00 $551,661.00 $599,483.00 $650,594.00 $838,509.00 $838,509.00 $730,697.00 $730,697.00 $587,210.00 Lot 4 R7052198 $1,730,373.00 $730,200.00 $730,200.00 $613,450.00 $613,450.00 $613,449.00 $661,517.00 $776,247.00 $776,247.00 $866,112.00 $866,112.00 $747,869.00 Total Actual Value $3,848,381.00 $1,589,389.00 $1,589,389.00 $1,419,050.00 $1,419,050.00 $1,476,221.00 $1,615,932.00 $2,055,534.00 $2,055,534.00 $2,072,554.00 $2,072,554.00 $1,700,944.00 6-9-2017 Sold for $3,500,000 $389k in improvements, repairs and maintenance over 2017 & 2018 3-10-2010 Sold for $2,500,000 Page 12 of 26 Camelot RV Storage Valuation History Weld County (125 Business Park) Property Address: 4075 Camelot Cir Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 Change in Value 2013 2014 Change in Value 2015 2016 Change in Value 2017 2018 Change in Value 2019 Change in Value Assessor's re-evall 24 -Jul -19 S 5 S S Actual Value Lot 2 475, 745.00 475, 745.00 440, 778.00 440,778.00 ($34,967.00) 303,821.00 263,289.00 ($177,489.00) 253,939.00 253,939.00 ($9,350.00) 287,199.00 287,199.00 $33,260.00 $938,884.00 $651,685.00 665,173.00 S S S S Actual Value Lot 3 730,697.00 730,691.00 838,509.00 838,509.00 $107,812.00 650, 594.00 599,483.00 ($239,026.00) 551,661.00 551,661.00 ($47,822.00) 571,990.00 571,990.00 $20,329.00 $1,179,124.00 $607,134.00 975,373.00 Actual Value Lot 4 Total Valuation Lots 2, 3 & 4 866,112.00 $ 2,072,554.00 866,112.00 $ 2,072,554.00 776,247.00 $ 2,055,534.00 776,247.00 $ 2,055,534.00 ($89,865.00) ($17,020 00) 661,517.00 $ 1,615,932.00 613,449.00 $ 1,476,221.00 ($162,798.00) ($579,313.00) 613,450.00 $ 1,419,050.00 613,450.00 $ 1,419,050.00 $1.00 ($57,171.00) 730,200.00 $ 1,589,389.00 730,200.00 $ 1,589,389.00 $116,750.00 $170,339.00 $1,730,373.00 $ 3,848,381.00 $1,000,173.00 $2,258,992.00 1,559,454.00 $ 3,200,000.00 Tax payers position $ 351,100.00 $ 526,854.00 $ 1,191,753.00 $ 2,069,707.00 Notes Business & Property Sold for $2,500,000 Purchaser: Mark Stonehocker $389k in improvements, repairs and maintenance over 2017 & 2018 142% Increase 100% + Increase Page 13 of 26 Income Rental Income Storage Rental (Checks and Cash) Storage Rental (Credit Card) Total Storage Rental Office Rent Total Rental Income fee Income Administrative Fees Other Fees Total Fee Income Credits Issued Total Income Gross Profit Expense Jan and Feb 2017 2016 2015 2014 13,30/ 49,/48 /6,3/5 $ 292,109 $ 91,301 S 2S9,912 $ 94,633 $ 236.4/4 $ S 63,056 2,800 $ 369,084 S 29,100 s 351,213 S 4/1/5 $ 331,107 $ 38,680 S 65,856 $ 398,784 $ 398,988 S S 2,928 S 3.942 $ $ 1/2 S 429 $ - $ 3,100 $ 4,371 $ (334) S (2.289) S (3,530) 369,787 $ 4.O81 $ 4/6 $ 4,557 S (2,540) $ 65,522 S 399,S95 S 399,829 $ 371,804 S 65,522 $ 399,595 S 399.829 Advertising/ Promotion / Website $ Bank fees. & CC Charge! Business Owners Association Fees S Insurance Management t ees Office Supplies Postage and PO Box Repairs and Maintenance Dump lank Pump Out $ Landscaping repair / maintenance $ 150 Snow Removal $ /29 Asphalt Repair S Repairs and Maintenance other Total Repairs and Maintenance Setur;:'j Cxpenses Taxes Property Telephone and Internet Expense Software substr'ptoins Utilities Water Electricity C;as Total Utilities Total Expenses Net Operating Income S 1.343 S 4,519 $ 3,800 $ 202 $ 49 S $ 515 / .642 5,015 5.109 24, /00 /33 196 $ $ S 5,900 s.045 2,/58 3,206 S $ $ $ S S S S S S S 25S 6,15/ 3,000 4,826 2 2, 800 523 444 6,805 1,246 2.198 5,213 4,104 S 3/1,804 S S S S s S $ S S S 2,541 5,414 3,600 4,06/ 22,800 2.95/ /60 5,925 1,530 931 4,656 8,862 $ 879 S 350 $ S 331 $ 460 S S S 130 2,612 321 $ 16,909 S 6,41/ $ 35,350 $ 2,080 S 2,42S $ 2,888 S 11.02/ S 1,168 $ 26,166 S 13,219 S 36,61/ S 1,9/2 S 2,3/S S 2,3 /S S 13,233 5 1.210 S 21,904 S 14,523 S 40,619 S 1,814 $ 2,411 S 2,228 S 15,042 5 1,432 $ 3,063 S 15,083 $ 16,818 S 18,703 $ 15,002 5 50, 519 $ 122,2 34 S277,361 $135,292 $ 264,537 $ 142,173 $ 229,632 Page 14 of 26 Beacon Storage Weld County Account #: 7052498 (125 Business Park) Property Address: 4075 Camelot Cir Longmont, CO 80504 Tax Year 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2006 Total Actual Value $3,539,725.00 $2,689,400.00 $2,689,400.00 $2,373,000.00 $2,373,000.00 $2,373,000.00 $2,373,000.00 $1,977,501.00 $1,977,501.00 $1,977,500.00 $1,977,500.00 $1,135,041.00 Purchased 1149-2006 for $2,185,000 Owner added 15,560 sq ft of mini warehouse in 2008. Total Actual Value 2009 $1,977,500 Total Actual Value 2008 $1,135,041 A differance of $842,459 increase from '08 to '09 bringing that number of the costs of the 15,650 sq ft to be $54.00 per sq ft. $2,185,000 '06 Sale Price $8421454'08 buildings added $3,027,459 Total Valuation as of 2009 Yet the assessor's Valuation is only $1,977,500 Page 15 of 26 Firehouse (Storage facility) Larimer County, Account #: R1648580 Property Address: 2600 S LINCOLN AVE LOVELAND, CO 80537 Tax Year Total Actual Value 2019 $10,700,000 2018 $7,199,900 2017 $7,199,900 12-15-2017 Sold for $22,250,000 SALE 2016 $6,400,000 2015 $5,662,800 2014 $3,884,000 2.013 $3,300,000 2012 $2,500,000 2011 $2,500,000 2010 $2,500,000 2009 $2,000,000 Page 16 of 26 Rockport Storage LLC (Adams County Henderson) Property Address: 11905 E 124TH AVE CO 80640 Year 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 Lot 1 R0013731 976, 347.00 605,000.00 605,000.00 424,318.00 424,318.00 423,369.00 423,369.00 Lot 2 R0174860 $ 1,692,286.00 $ 1,367,468.00 $ 1,367,468.00 $ 1,367,468.00 $ 769,201.00 $ 683, 734.00 $ 683,734.00 Total Actual Value 2,668,633.00 3-15-2019 Sold for $4,700,000 1,972,468.00 1,972,468.00 1,791,786.00 1,19 3, 519.00 1,107,103.00 1,107,103.00 9-10-2010 Sold for $2,800,000 SALE SALE Page 17 of 26 Purchase Date June 9t", 2017 CAMELOT STORAGE LLC Income Statement 12 Months Ended December 31, 2017 Sates Cot,tttiner StrYriXIC Open Storage Lexker s Secord Fear 'Nash Boy Garage Storage Total Sales Gross Profit Operating Expenses kivertisN\Prerro'ipeosze Balk FePsiCredtt Care Cha'ges C&uol Labor Dues & Subscriptons FiGA Dries pies; & rrierte;nrr‘bni insurance Interest Extense • Loan Interest Expense - Otter Lcasinr Ccmmrsszcns LegalViccountrogWrcfezicnal Construction Oeve'aprne Fee Management Fees • Facility 'r'aint. & Repairs Office Expense Refunds Security Seri cc SLA ;ten Servicing Fees Payroll Taxes Taxes, Procnrty I elept►ore UtIt?s Vethc'e Expertise Admit, Acctg, StafF" & Office Total Operating Expenses Operating Income (Loss) Other Income (Expenses) Total Other Income (Expenses) Net Income (Lon) Before Taxes Net Income (Loss) 750. CO 219,935.04 1,1 18.33 0. CO 0.ce 221,803.31 221,803. 37 805.00 4,033.CO 0.CQ 1,50? CO 2,540.CO 0.Cc 13,292.00 73,949.00 0.00 0.00 350.00 5/1.00 O.CO 10,605.00 2,/13.00 0.00 1,186.00 U.CU D.Cc 0.00 649.00 6,984.00 381.00 3,426.110 132,986.00 :32,986.00 0.00 88,8"_ 5.37 80,815.37 Income Approach (2017) There are NO real estate taxes shown, they were accounted for at closing. Factoring in taxes at the 2017-2018 rate (@@$42.44k), the income would be much lower. Half a year's income minus half a year's taxes of $21,220, the true 6 month NOI is $67,595 or $135,190 annually. Divided by a 7% CAP rate results in an entity price of $1,931,285. Page 18 of 26 • CAMELOT STORAGE LLC Income Statement 12 Months Ended December 31, 2018 Saks Container Storage Open Storage Lockers Second Floor Wash Bay Gdrage Stcrax e Total Sales Gross Profit Operating Expenses Mver .ng\PrornoWiebs2te Bank Fees\Credit Card Charges Casa' Labor Dues & Slsuscrtyt ord HQA Dues Meals & Ertert-3vv*ient Insurance irterest Experce - Loan Interest Experse Other Lca.:ing Cortriisso: Leydl5,Accountirig\Professional Consrructrcn Devetoprr, r1 Fee Mann cnent Fees - Facrllty Manta & Repairs Office Expense Refunds Secalty Serf ce SBA toe r' Seri :rig Fe# Payroll Taxes Taxes, ProCer;y Te' c ,'r Mile Expense Adrrrn, Atctg, Starring & Office Total Operating Expenses Operating Income (Loss) Other Income (Expenses) Total Other Income (Expenses) Net Income (Loss) Before Taxes Net Income (Loss) 3,316,66 468,220,91 23,497 07 135.00 28,152.58 523,352.22 523, 352.12 10,959.58 1:,793 94 3,897 00 5,16455 4,500 00 2G'1.10 8,968 20 15:,878 15 321.00 2,000.00 1,460.00 14,429.13 56,135.56 16,2/2.56 3,914.35 1,018.00 1,836.96 6,669.16 2,723.94 ?2,8/0.62 2,019 96 9,119.61 1,0O9.64 32,13S,CO 371;261,07 152,091.15 0,00 152,091.15 152,091.15 %2 Years Taxes Income Approach (2018) At the 2017/2018 tax rate a full year's taxes would be at or about $42,440, reducing the income even further to approximately $130,871. At a 7% cap rate (the assessors stated CAP rate) the value of the total entity would be $1,869,586. Page 19 of 26 glint 125 Business Park T 4 �� site s • f a a.. S —w w et la e a Se � _� Se — 40130 . . �•. . -111 �' t • • _ • • . —a.--- ns.mily..+.f ..sr. A. R7052198 405S c -r e ser ,ItA ant. it eft at nes c Co.cty 2012 Nearrreo LS t r •4 e:c Court Page 20 of 26 aft Aft Is, ••...•. •.- •.w a • -. f,•._ C u ., C fl!'1• • -sir:, N • „A 200' Setback (Non occupied Building zone Gas line Valve set. IMP .. 1• a. A'-- yr r r e •.•• •M or.: errs r n, W7 N .4• //i :salvo er .(1 :es or.XV / r. ' K .r 4 at ��• • Aar •w•ti v • ♦.. Sets t I -1 ALTA/NSPS LAND TITL LOS 2. 3 d 4. BLOCK I. AMMDkD MAT 9P 8AOK'V A. r D . LOCATED 111 THE NORTHWEST QUARTER or NORM RA110E 68 IFEN7 0? 1 COUNTY OF VFID. STATE ' TOTAL AREA - 74123Z SQ IT. OR I SHEET ? : ara1. 1.foe' •IIC av fl'{• L IAR.7t ..r_ -. 1 N • N rot .` ,- -X NL'N1 'IX'C 1'ANfrt . RCTION 23. ' WAtSH1P 3 6TH PM. . COLORADO 06 ACRES WORE OR LPSS • •an Mil S.� „.n... waw /wv. 4 / la ►tb% r.• sr seta 0-4.411‘k q, la I �—+ EY _... •�-- r� • - � dis <lainar ge• 50' Gas Line Easem .4; :44.i 20' Utility Easement a ••• *I arses • Silk bm, . 50' Gas Line Easement J•1 Sad 'lWel► -ter• _eff ntrinbial to w •• We: .M 7Doe 200' Setback (Non occupied Building zone t LP �i 71 r • w,.,l/ vrv,iw 1 °Ai�9.v o• 04. --plan Isar) Gas line Valve set. • .►s. ' a ••. w IIa .NI ,_. s_a� -•a --•''-_.«f'i.• .e- -.- a— - • . .r-rw•.-••..-fte+•1M L a Odom 1' • • t • _ _- ��- -imago opt i_al, Sala Saw r 0' of Easements (50' of Gas Line & 20' of Water District) at s ..w I - •• a.- - sr -err c• -• g• C 1y e May emaparolle • _ .. 3 ..' - sw►J - • r a • M. a• I r ma e•. • C?: j: ins 24s�2 se• ▪ <- ct •,,;• 3. d ti., !'s n no 7" WAD ($ um ••• T ..wad 'it re \•CP - •- p r r -aka g 1 1 t- As NOTE: The construction setbacks from valve sets, gas lines and easements, for the safety of property p Operty & life results in significantly less than maximum use of this property. I • wa. •• •• 1 I 21 of26 emu) art€ K) (P1 _ -cmEIE J Ia.. V U40µ1 G10044 'WHIP CON. • ea.LAnD • X AOCAP P444 0 o0Ari ED NO 11.X1101 ,6,00 19,[ O WAIT1 VA_r .0.3 VIAT40 NETER "• IRE X100001 (p 00001100 MAC 0— CON�3044544 C awst WA ac a FLAB100 ET — —C 02.2150..C.1 LL-1404 0.140 .1LC'R Cµ P.O. 011 £4001140 VAULTMORA LAG, )9 4 vlc03ity MOP CALL 1 • 00 egend tar. ALV220T YL.1r 1 At 0940140 /dx0 5.4900.0 a re ~0034 ZS 10 NO ROAR LT 1-I/2 /14.41004 CAP i 0..75➢ ftArr0", 5140 1504! • LTSC.6en AT T.4 wg1cT O ut'0 FRO! PEC0N0 ,w0 AS .: A01gm CARA010 AS 0021 ME CF P R°OO, PLO4Urc 51,. — . OANnt. 0 45JXT I,{ '111 U1107 PELF — +--- OtiSCIA c Ls C —.— 0110.10. e1. - - 4 — GC w Cena GC 0. 005 010 or 0 100 v ,T 1.0S6111FIE5 2,515 Ail tlV1mX£A UAn 161 (*3.24 Cr ACt1 1.90.B02 30010100E coNa1ETE 4450040 E.a SRACN De41040h ne Cartlfloote SF/ L0. 7 o..0. 210 N0. w. -a n 70_ al - 1000 a 014 w0- OF .21 CO NTT c0'.aAW 1405 µLTA/NSPS LAND T TLE SU ':VEY LOTS 2 3 & 4 BLOC! 1 AMENDED PLAT OF RADEMACHER BUSINESS PARK P U D LOCATED IN THE NOR7HWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 23 TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH RANGE 66 WEST OF 1HE 6111 P M COUNTY OF WELD STATE OF COLORADO TOTAL ARE4 = 743 232 SQ FT OR 17 06 ACRES MORE OR LESS RyiAW, SHEET 1 01 2 Penal Dmvipeon Ov • N= 0 09 40 Al Maur, OS/0 /162 411[ a FSX.6 ▪ 0210 REC rO .13C133 10.AT OF 0111141.2.72 140]0 SLSVS•3 1,431 110 217-9 x 40.1 2110• Boundary Cloeuro Report 0,02 m �E 150410* 39416 !01400 E 14044„ 5.4110 03.0 COLAs. *19 52,s14-3403300 11 14.4,40 301'4 lLG1L11101 RA11501]00 CCU. lnl6Y2 020 Or% IaISY 0.0x0. 1156 15.RAIRJO 535. 411TA OTx6 Ol COLfg 41P446, 0104.➢ 7170 CINPSC N151700 121Ciry 4070 CIAA..LO a. re c Ln.c'. 7 s PFM9EICR .14 COURSoRTR E. 03.0 CFROR ! PT50211. 3 Ale 1132 5 P- 000 141 44.24100 GRAPHIC SCALE 001111 • Al A *004 WL1171 FA 20 4010140\ —.110.-‘0•—••—...-1•61".4,01 - •2311aE'c33z4r IOY __ C 43. I. IP —17.20 argil -"1/4"' 0.)%r 211E -0.4005321 Me.. LIE.L T.. 14. 4J 01.90• t•.e�wi�_ 0.1. 16 RI a c0. vim• +v a / f w1x /Utoul /l / / / /I / 101...0 90000 / L-00501001 / 04.001015 • (01 / ▪ / (]1-X70 010 w (0) / / 7174 (C) 7160 (vy / 44•474040 (*4100 1.03(11 ANA a *14 441 II(•1 7611 (!411)1 • Nolen 10.r Tr Paa...n. 621 0034 CaNT.C.T NJ0r0 IWNp1r.9-•%9., 4 03q.T 446004Th3 W C.Aa06h1.40340 54--0 L 44Nnp /AO 0.0.4.40 1 0G", �`E° ?C 070001 4710°0,. ew ti L CVA ..o.1 .,e ei 0121, ,oev, a Al 10. RL 1aMWPi 2 AMMMO, TO 000 .0➢0 LA0 TV kW r 4044010E NIT LEGAL 0000. 40-21 PO. ART 1110CT IN Tr 5 4 T.. CARO AFTER YOU 30 MAT RAY AVTACT4 00340 0040 ANY 0[1167 IN 1404 2x107 42 *4.040* ORE IRAN 105 1LA151Tm. TI. CAR SF 1CT CE410000% N0.0 NM. 4 In LAM 1 .T'q. ,6 .440434 1 W 0.4E IA0119g ,FC 3I 2109 ..Alr.Oll�nYhiC.4S MI WOO AOICWuw rwih..lb Out An V w"SI�ON 570704061 Or SC 3K 5.01 00,44 L0 404W he ..4x40 a 550 Oa r S ILNI XAS 5505 rwn .o.11u tS Sr .0x150.2. S 161.04 4 540041. CPS 0.40010 tux., LLA4v o. 600.0Q000 M 1101 01,110. *0"f o00100 uxC0LOT • 00 C ot LS 1005 T TIC .Or01100 OT 500 TOT 040A 0010) 044 4 058. 0121 1 Yp_00 MAST, CAP 000400➢ LS 45005 n0001EAST !*0000 a Sao L0 AS 504014W.a MCA., SI n�� 2 Tor tt TTZK no043 2.0 r T Av... SX01m RE E. ARE Frr.ATM THERM. n SAM Ix] 121 .y 00005.4] C 1C:to4**U C4WAS V W)I4C *5... 4 1x9 4424 04 ITC e_.OrtAr y 210.4. KK904020h<p✓u4OKt, TOAN,1 CM WTW PP1 910.5 0 CR440414 411-IOL VI PUS. 16110 v0UBN2r 1000443. µ1u15 0R WAGES MY 1X40)4 Lw10 4041454 / 000rICMT .4.10059 04 00".95,X1 l.0 .t11 0-4.1.1R0141 0 1N61..C l0 STAIE 90009E ET 00-µv10 n N5 1.1104.1 A 033 001 . O e.AN2E 0.1 00 3 7 ConT RACE 041 30!'11 5.50 1T2M -4541 R CY•CK N 0!NL/b 4015 0. N1T GOvx.xpl 034.1 IXOE 5x iuTrix11Ii 1 ar;mfca +.r mrE ruun0110101. Ow iurA— Or ANT W1Y afµE Nrt Of II.41 M 1, r 11( alt O1 ANT cmor .li 63265 Of wF. 1140 OT 1.1.451.0 .4344 uOVE 1.00 ,v uOVT.L 11 4109.. ,l Ric a 115. 5 M alto.¢ A4A5Aoa2.5 5090 NUCOR Aic US 5001, !GOT 4. *400401300 500,Divn"C51WAA"ON*E115 11 SAIRI_ 6� c*m LE 1494 Y 51000 'rt.F4.4 0Pµ 11 HC��02r. OAss2 a TF racoon Ux[C 0. 05 a4e� T la FLOM 1bnA1gIDEC N THE aT ratnAl lsTY 5 LO A. 1140 A AKA 0190511110 10 Mc 00004 mC O.0 10.01.15 01AXCE F\NIXX. A LACC0ra,C TO Tr Ma ELMO SUw/E RAE u7 40404 140*(40. 4100 OPL.G-44‘0 f 00154 001111 10 0011 4000 004010•0 Xt 20101 TO *40 (LLLAAS LAO I -.A1, f 7IOU A WAX, 1+.051 0,CPWTJL:(5 NO 9fCfT.OT... lent ) 0L 04 1 c• 31e➢40.A COOL II, 2117 (1717 GCE 1 001 On) 11...C 7010 61,R51- AS 2110.O*1 KU 145.0.1 Of FA0T"i 41 Tnu xnvt*I �,n 0055 COSINE 1Ary en IiTi."XAr7� E,L+cl�,l➢ Oq " TIC TO a wPU. Y 115 512.419 rg0P4.T1 F 74.2a0m FT Ot VVttRA(]CS MOT' 0.A C /AD WAY 01012 N5003'C0WLY 4is A 011 IANT WN0 41100005 ok ROT N 000 REAS.2po01E OR 15 sters.r. U. A u GMro 1 eO. And 0.050 AG Art. 210# Av BC MI6 FACTOR 1CAL 67015 S0NP PX0515 (ALTAR.. L.100 TIRE u r LIMY War A 0.0 0 .45 RAVES FA -50.113111130.11311T,( 13 010 4EORCA44e 1TEr 9) 14 Cot.0001NOMATIO1 4 R. COMTY !F 0Ckn 901010 AS 1560400]3 0000565 29 7007 *00 19 0040T TO 040(1 (µGAT 30CO TI 0 TAE 101 0 .81 TOOL ♦ oNAL -R vK XT 016.0 2C0m.9 An0 51V2 30 iTahi T]) 40 hE 10]0000 ODOWMrs 1➢C YFN110l1m 0 1005 0604 1410411`➢ nIL 501417' Am Arc Am., uwncKLr X14cx me raa'Wnc Un 1111.01 In 01142 Cain. 1.4010 40944 244.4004* 430.00441 xUNP4. Ar0/ax Lea A 0 r I 047 04 101 w.C Na 16`11..1 LV' ✓\S Tp M 1010 11-7.i i�1 P'W1 444041106 e 00 en 1101.5 P� �n ` t. f<w _ ttA. A IvpA 40 $ I1e 000 1 70.1 9'C 000 2551.4 �AX040004 014x40 4Mv 0Aµ 910 AmT l Tu5 0`10 Tyl b uL4WACrOq 91.[+¢5 /0 K 04"0 ✓ TA M C Sla C]lL ]1 10:6 �BEO 1.O :TliaO nc�., 1TA�v]N6 AKr55 00000x' pART 14 1440'CM to f 210 50' 1 h0,0,1v w0. 0.4.06[0 a `6 021 Wawt0 Sr, WT!A4 5 02040003010044 0500 ➢00 3941010 OAT 1{4001➢ 61 Ht ulo, . 0..401 Aw(tY, GOH A. A.I1 2 H iL IA�y 04 ICT T� Y `43:152,71.45,5,,F44;,,..4 N 0.+131 C1Kt 9W fi..J1 i LL 0411 0 AO 055144 00 A T X Itt tr0.?S 5165 NCL 041534310 I1EKWIN 0" M A150I01Lr.II a 2195 IBS 0w 1,E, 34. 04 073 00 45.07-4-1001 140iu2AT 00A 40.4411 PLCA*EA01.ert TIC 00100€ lei^ 2 65.46. Ma sip ��u A4 T1. O M AH01E �� 4 29GCS TO 114C ASO. CC AO. 25a3pe Orr -91-? OKYPwTSKa A0lr09i 400 48 010776 rTXO%cINGT*S APROMS. 0.42116 A PAL11500 a ASO 00 2-.770 icRuS C0.111.5A ACC., Or REG no 0..002.00 Oar" G.c A A IS 666[110 R 6.6.IT1 saB\je5%.44 i'M)*)2),M Nm LBT U. A 10050 ....- TO W04f 100 510.0 L O. A.0 10403 WON3 0X1 001034 TO CCM, TUT 006 RAP On ALAT AN M 3.s..... Cn TT I6 BASSO .11.E RACE ti m ..COD on% 041 7115 900 0141.9, ST... COAL .1.0.pK c0. µl L.1 ,r` 11111E 440(15 !WILT WA:WO. MO 00000.0 54µV0.1 T ,. 40 ...ICS CLv \`' ; m ilu. m a 1211 q \ \ 210 4211 ITIT7 C4,04O NnM[RCRAMc• a00O�G SOS momu.a... w.0 010.1007.,4_ 00 10103/531 010341T15WAP0. 0aT 703PP.A6r➢OYYE6 \ X ACCWCA 00 w -I CIL ST Oint AS vF MACII40�D0 10.40'1+110. \ . OIMAnTY Cil V.NUAVII MKS, OeS MD CA 111 t FO. 024304 l 00 WAr a4 SAMI10WS of a 1 r4Weu n 400.4 (TAT 2120 Moo# Or E 0AU 04664011 B0 w/nc/Aw 50EET I OF 2 Page 22 of 26 O Legend rounc AMOJUT AIOOuu)nT AS 65.POES OUP[ IACtIAIMENT AS LESCBCEC 6 SET II x6 5 POEM NEIL T- /r- ACLYRUO CAP .,CPCG r'.AIIROR5 5TARV 11401 <AU) As NV.. Al TLE Of SEAVT �C) w nT U ISW PECLf9 MO AS VEASIRIB A. AS PP TIC >.Ar Of TtE AK0IOQ AA! ,P MCEYASI 61S UCO, PALO Pu 0 tow CP .7 ULi -�-+- fEACC T 9CN tC SOILARS c MMOIGAF PAHANC S.ATL ® xo PrlSCw.. — ��- 5 1ER WK - 3.73 WATTS VALVE ® WATA ICE EO .�. CAL Hrt ACTS 61 «rxAnn, VALVE ® CIE._OUT — w—_[1140 NC e Stun SOLAR CCCO C OSI CPL ALAI - AWOL VC • r1TAvswAlw • EI(CIMC VEER E (tECn PCI PAP.L m (L -USC vA.AT i MCAT CL_ 1CY OECAIAlRE UVICT OVVOATIO MT/ V C TOL UM* PCAE - TKAPOTIC LAC - — T1=O'. CHE v C - CCC 111 ® CC METES m WImIpmF%D VAu T ✓ 'WED VALVE • AIR ...MOI(A u'TI li. wol.. va CF ACCESS E ¢OIEPUSE (01101(1[ u TACTICS PB Waal CnAPCIC SCALE ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY LOTS 2, 3 & 4 BLOCK P U D LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER Rp SECTION BUSINESS23,rownswo 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST 0F' THE 6TH PM, COUNTY OF WELD STATE OF COLORADO TOTAL AREA = 743 232 SQ FT, OR 17 06 ACRES MOPE OR LESS SHEET 2 OF 2 —_ _ .22-3140t iano5{O)_-_-- �.-.-��—�� v4t oat.V. �t4W11�_ / / ✓/ / / l.'Cc�.Ra Tun AYA) C 4.1t•- II1 , *s '-`;" TI 4gnT (al Ii Isy U4rt W AI.'T-`MAI p T.I ' a�ar'Awv, )V) _ _ Z4 v.0 Ccr 5�4,) Lei lt mock • 01 OVA. VIAL FITS, Alta ya m..Lr Tx P,... /A, vx P.. AS ALVA Ira n- 7 1 CPMS M - O MS NAMi SA'iG E(lC C ) 1 4 ICM1� 0,1_ 1, • AAI .t1r N'0 _ -LAO.TTC. A, 11�= SI WAS LOT A. BLCCIT A 50 S (PAJAG Moo.4 O AtitTn— Fes' — -1 J 170 ...Ca. tI CLv) w ( - t Yt) NA O L LAOS Y a10 At / ./n SHEET 2 Of 2 Page 23 of 26 Lot 2 (5.045 acres) Camelot RV Storage Lot3 Lot4 (6.588 acres) (5.429 acres) VIMPlicale. Nitheillaa •'cP 32 416. CAl 1EL O . CIR towage The area highlighted is covered with water and gas easements and the gas valve set. Accordingly, it is our opinion this property is worth substantially less than the remainder of the lots. We have used a value of $32,670/acre ($.75 per sq. ft) for this ground Page 24 of 26 Computations Comparison Approach to Value See Section VII for explanation & rationale for computations on all three lots. Lot 2 (Acct. # 7051998) 5.045 acres As shown on Exhibit 11 there are 26,000 sq. ft. of easement ground on the North, this ground we have valued at $ 32,670 per acre ($ .75 per sq. ft.) and the remainder of the Lot at $ 55,000.00 per acre. 26,000 sq. ft. @ $ .75 per sq. ft. = $ 19,500.00 5.045 acres X 43,560 sq. ft. per acre = 219,760 sq. ft. minus 26,000 sq. ft. equals 193,760 sq. ft. which is 4.448 acres (193,760/43,560) residual acreage 4.448 acres X $ 55,000.00/acre equals $ 244,640.00 adding the $ 19,5000. Lot 2 unimproved Land value is $ 264,140.00. RE: Exhibit 2 improvement valuations Lot 2 has 45,000 sq. ft. of asphalt @ $ .72 per sq. ft. = $ 29,160.00 and 144,500 sq. ft. of crushed asphalt @ $ .40 per sq. ft. = $ 57,800.00 TOTAL VALUE of Lot 2.........$ 351,100.00 Lot 3 (Acct. # 7052098) 6.588 acres As shown on Exhibit 11 there are 45,600 sq. ft. of easement ground on the North 45,600 sq. ft. @ $ .75 per sq. ft. = $ 34,200.00 6.588 acres X 43,560 sq. ft. per acre is 286,973 sq. ft. minus 45,600 sq. ft. equals 241,373 sq. ft. which is 5.541 acres (241,373/43,560) residual acreage 5.541 acres X $ 60,000.00/acre equals $ 333,246.00 adding the $ 34,200.00 Lot 3 unimproved Land value is $ 367,446.00. Reference Exhibit 2 Lot 3 has 221,400 sq. ft. of asphalt @ $ .72 sq. ft. equals $ 159,408.00 TOTAL VALUE OF Lot 3 $ 526,854.00 Page 25 of 26 ri i put -:3 t0 40l s Count ue Lot 4 (Acct # 7052198) 5 429 acres Per Exhibit 11, there are 43,900 sq ft of easement ground on the North 43,900 sq ft. @ $ 75/ sq. ft. = $ 32,925 00 5 429 acres X 43,560 sq ft per acre is 236,487 sq ft minus the 43,900 sq ft equals 192,587 sq ft. which is 4 421 acres (192,587/43,560) residual acreage 4 421 acres @ $ 68,000 00/acre equals $ 300,628 00 adding the $ 32,925 00 Lot 4 unimproved Land value is $ 366,478.00. Reference Exhibit 2 Lot 4 has (by our calculations) 146,738 sq ft of asphalt @ $ .72/sq ft. = $ 105,652 00 Concrete @ $ 723 00 Office building @ $ 519,400 00. The "New" metal garage building (by our costs) is $ 199,500.00 TOTAL VALUE of Lot 4.........$ 1,191,753.00 Lot 4 $ 1,191,753 00 Lot 3 526,854 00 Lot 2 351,100 00 $ 2,069,707.00 Total Land Value Page 26 of 26 Construction Loan Draw Request Certificate for Payment Owner/Borrower: Comelot Storage LLC/DaviJ P. I.cell.ief D. Jensen Construction project address: 4075 Camelot Clr, Longmont, Colorado 80504 Contractor: Owners Draw i!: Loans) T: 2 ..a Check ti Contractor ! Supplier Description of Materials r Budget Iteru 1$ Draw / Check Amount or Work Performed 5 15,1(19.70 Check Lovewell Fencing, Inc, Final Invoice 01569 1002 Colorado Tree Spade Tree removal on fence line 2 S 1,650,00 1053 CanAn► Deposit fot to Foy garage l r $ 1 I, IX.00 p 1054 Mountain View Fire rescue Plan Review & Inspection Fcc I S 127.50 1008 TJB Consulting Group. LLC. Doc review for site plan and new 10 bay gaarugc I b 150.00 1009 Rocky Mountain Parking Lot Services, !Tic Parking Lot striping for new parking area 4 $ 663.00 TOTAL $29,t8O.20 SPECIAL NOTICE: Attach unapproved change order or cost overrun request - In consideration of the hank advancing funds against approved hank loans) listed above and to induce the bank to make such loan advances, the undersigned certifies and represents That requested funds for payment of-alllabor and materials listed above have been used In the consrntction of the above described project. Ad labor and material for cause has bccn delivered and/or stored for use in the isnprovernent of the project site listed above. We further certify that bills for labor and tnatctials, in connection with the improvements of the above described project sue, which are due and payable or have been paid, and all material wherever stored arc fully covered by insurance. Finally, we approve this loan draw request. Borrower / Owner: Contractor: /D--99-/ 2 - Fur ftwt l Use Un(V ---"t; res _.r' -e. Total prior disbursements Total disbursed to date Available loan !With Date: Bark Officer r,S6, 0•c 11,100.+ 127.5+ 450.+ 32,234.+ 500. + 8,562.21+ 2,318.89+ 4,130.61+ 24,130.+ 3,079.7+ 22.58+ 31.02+ 56.44+ 1,243.5+ 120.4 + 289.94+ 1,337.4- 2,385.+ 2,843.+ 19,495.4- 689.48+ 908-45+ 975.+ 270• + 25,367.5+ 384.2+ 482.2+ 5,656.75+ 4,124.23+ 642.89+ 28,800.+ 90.4- 2,785.+ 3,126.93+ 127.5+ 2,017.5+ 3,325.61+ 9.2+ 2,137.77+ 95.96+ 40.52+ 555.15+ 701.6+ 43.01+ 430.5+ 19.97+ 101.24+ 111.37+ 167.92+ 32.52+ 125.7+ 24.68+ 133.6+ 184.98+ 199,595-72* Valuation Report of Commercial Property for County Board of Equalization CAMELOT STORAGE LLC Petitioner vs. Weld County Assessor's Office Respondent Docket plumber. 2019-3104; 2019-3105; 2019-3106 Parcel Number: 1207-23-2-02-004; 1207-23-2-02-003; 1207-23-2-02-002 Schedule Number: R7052198, R7052098, R7051998 Appeal Number: 2008224783; 2008224784; 2008224785 Date: 8/5/2019 Time: 10:30 AM Board: 1 Prepared By Millie Channel! Assessor's Office Staff Appraiser Assessor's Indicated Value COMMERCIAL $3,730,700 TOTAL: $3,730,700 Or $281 per SF Salient Facts and Conclusions Purpose of Appraisal To determine Market Value as of 1/1/19 based on an appraisal date of 6/30/18. Property Rights Appraised Unencumbered fee simple interest. Location 4075 CAMELOT CIR WELD Land Area 743,220 SF Property Type Commercial Imp 1 2 SF 6,085 7,200 Quality Ave rag e Ave rag e Occupancy Office Building Mini Warehouse Built As Office Building Mini Warehouse Value Indications: Cost Approach Market Approach income Approach Class Masonry Metal Frame $3,666,159 $3,730,700 $3,731,822 Year Built Yr Rem Stories 200O N/A 2 2017 N/A 1 $276 per SF Or $281 per SF $281 per SF Final Value $3,730,700 Or $281 per SF Map of Subject Improvement # 1 Quality Average Total SF 6,085 Occupancy Description Office Building Year Bit As Description Class Year Built Remodeled % Office Building 1?' Occupancy % 1 00 % # of Stories SF Masonry 2000 N/A 0% 2 6,085 a:es:Ir+� 1.1.4t gi Gyta' U13 fl CrAnCE Matt TWO bin OM OP SP Yea; Boa 203: l'kLMJJt I..C Ri J Er n rg SA. PM A&w Hem' YM15-0 at rfri4 trIZ !aka i d f isi� :110g ') if *114 al1G.3al 1611.01 I rt -r H'Y 600,4 ni r ctuTh m ore* Ca. 1 643 Improvement # Quality Total SF Bit As Description Mini Warehouse 2 Average 7,200 Class Metal Frame _•l e...�_ti�.:_ .3' e Occupancy Description Mini Warehouse Year Year Built Remodeled % 2017 raid Fluff a i!tN'i:f1 .t I6" it'll N/A L. Occupancy % 100% # of Stories SF 0% 1 7,200 Cost Approach Summary The Assessor is currently using Marshall and Swift cost tables for the cost approach of commercial properties in Weld, which has been approved by the Division of Property Taxation to be utilized by Colorado Assessors. The structure has been classified properly utilizing the Marshall and Swift Valuation service and an appropriate value assigned. A land value has likewise been established through the utilization of vacant land sales of comparable properties. Cost Approach Land Value Sales utilized to establish the value in the subject neighborhood are 2017 and 2018 market for the 2019 assessment date. The comparative sales approach is the most reliable method of land valuation. Pursuant to 39-104-(10.2) (c) C. R. S., the Assessor may utilize sales from July 2013 through the current market to establish the proper value, if sufficient information is not available in the prior 18 months. Also, comparables outside the subject property area may be used. The Weld County Assessor has an established ongoing sales confirmation and validation program for property transactions used in developing value. The land size of the subject is 743,220 square feet Comparable commercial land in the subject area is valued at $3.25 per square foot. If no vacant land sales were available in this area, we utilized the abstraction/allocation method to establish land value. A search of land sales was conducted and the following sales were considered most appropriate due to location, size and visibility. Situs Comparable 1 120 Laura Ct, Comparable Comparable 2 2704 Main St City Dacono Longmont 3 9170 Rogers Rd Longmont Sale Date 0412712017 9/30/2015 4/2/2018 Sale Price $2,000,000 $1,732,600 $2,074,000 Net SF 418,010 543,629 740,520 Assessor's Indicated Subject Land Value $2,415,465 or $3.25 per SF $ Per SF $4.78 $3.19 $2.80 5 6 Weld Cost Breakdown Sheet Tax Year: 2019 Parcel #: 1207-23-2-02-004 Account R7052198 # of Buildings: 2 Report Date: 0810112019 Imp #: 1 NBHD: Commercial - 3925 - 00 Quality: Average Imp Gross SF: 6,085 Imp Net SF: 0 Perimeter: 230 BItAs Order #: HVAC Type: Year Bit: UnAdj Base $/sf: Perim Mult MH Wa l l Mult: *Fndation $/sf: Sprinkler $/sf: MH Skirt $: 1 BItAs Desc: Office Building Package Unit 2000 Adj Year Blt: 107,00 Cost Mult: 0.9580 # Stories Mutt: 1.0000 1.00 2.99 0.00 0.00 316 6085 0.00 MH Skirt lnft: 0 *HVAC $/sf: *Roof $/sf: Sprinkler sf: * These $/sf Adjustments include all Multipliers Exterior/Class: Masonry 2000 Story Ht: 1.0200 Local Mult: Story Ht Mult: *Floor $/sf; *Energy $/sf: Sprinkler RCN: MH Skirt RCN: Condition: CM -Typical Percent Complete: 100% BItAs SF: 6,085 No. of Stories; 10 BItAs Units: 0.9900 O9530 0.00 0.00 $23,488 0.00 Base $/SF: MH Tag Mult: *Interior $/sf: Adj Base $/sf; BItAs RCN: Total BItAs RCN: 2.00 0 108.05 1.0000 0.00 101.64 $618,479 $641,968 AddCode: Detail Type: Detail Description: Units: $IUnit: RCN: Ovrde: Ovrd $: 1154 Add On Concrete Slab Average 670 $5.68 $3,800 ❑ $0 843 Add On Asphalt Average 160,000 $2.53 $404,800 $114,714 Total Detail RCN = RCN + Override RCN: $3,806 Plumbing Adjust: $0 Rough -In Adjust + $114,714 $0 Imp Attribute Type: Imp Attribute Description: Imp Attribute Adj: Adjustment Type: Replacement Cost New ($); Percent Complete (x): RCN x Perc Complete ($): Amateur Adj Value (-): Design Adj Value (+): Exterior Adj Value a+): Interior Adj Value (+): Functional Obs Value (-): Economic Obs Value (-): Other Obs Value (-): Physical Depr Value (-): Landscaping Cost (+): RCN Less Depr (=): Condo Percent (x): RCNLD x Condo Perc (5): Page 1 of 1 Percent 100.00% 0.00% Amount 17!487 so 1760,487 0.00% Adjustments to RCNLD Factor, RCN Less Depr (5): NBHD AdJ (x): $0 Market Adjusted Cost (=): 0.00% 0.00% $0 0.00% So 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 16.13% $122,697 $0 $6371790 100.00% 0 $637,790 Quality Adjustment (x): Property Type Adj (=): Adj Cost before Attrib (=) : Total M u It Attrib (x) : Total Additive Attrib (+): 7 Final Adjusted Cost (=): jAmount $637190 1.00 $637,790 1.00 $0 1.00 X637,790 1.00 so $0 1137,790 Imp #: 2 NBHD: Commercial - 3925 - 00 Imp Gross SF: 7,200 Imp Net SF: 0 Quality: Average Perimeter: 410 Condition: CM -Typical Percent Complete: 100% BItAs Order #: HVAC Type: Year Bit: UnAdjBase $fsf: Perim Mult: MH Wall Mult: *Fndation $lsf: Sprinkler $/st: MH Skirt $: * These 1 None 2017 33.00 1.0710 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 BItAs Desc: Mini Warehouse Exterior/Class: Metal Frame Adj Year Blt: 2017 Cost Mult: 1.0200 # Stories Mult: 1.0000 *HVAC $fsf: 0.00 *Roof $/sf: 0.00 Sprinkler st: 0 MH Skirt Int 410 fsf Adjustments include all Multipliers Story Ht: Local Mult Story Ht Mult: *Floor $fsf: *Energy $Isf: Sprinkler RCN: MH Skirt RCN: 16 0.9700 1.0410 0.00 0.00 $0 0.00 BItAs SF: 7,200 No. of Stories: 1.00 BItAs Units: Base $15F: 0 32.65 MH Tag Mult: 1.0000 *Interior $fsf: 0.00 Adj Base $fsf: 36.40 BItAs RCN: $262,080 Total BItAs RCN: $262,080 AddCode: Detail Type: Detail Description: Units: $/Unit: RCN: Ovrde: Ovrd $: Total Detail RCN = RCN + Override RCN: Plumbing Adjust: $0 Rough -In Adjust: $0 Imp Attribute Type: Imp Attribute Description: Imp Attribute Adj: Adjustment Type: Replacement Cost New ($): Percent Complete (x): RCN x Perc Complete ($): Amateur Adj Value (-): Design Adj Value (+}: Exterior Adj Value (+}: Interior Adj Value (-F): Functional Obs Value (-): Economic Obs Value (-): Other Obs Value (-): Physical Depr Value (-): Landscaping Cost (+): RCN Less Depr (=): Condo Percent (x): RCNLD x Condo Perc ($): Percent $ Amount $262,080 100.00% $0 $262,080 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 1.00% $2,621 $0 100.00% $259,459 0 $259,459 Adjustments to RCNLD Factor RCN Less iDepr ($): NBHD Adj (x): Market Adjusted Cost (=): Quality Adjustment (x): Property Type Adj (=) : Adj Cost before Attrib (=): Total Mult Attrib (x): Total Additive Attrib (+): Final Adjusted Cost (=): 1.00 $ Amount $259,459 $0 $259,459 1.00 $0 1.00 $0 $259,459 1.00 $0 $0 $259,459 Weld Cost Breakdown Sheet Tax Year: 2019 Parcel #: 1207-23-2-02-003 Account R7052098 # of Buildings: 1 Report Date: 08/02/2019 Imp #: 1 NBHD: Commercial - 3925 - 00 Imp Gross SF: 1 Imp Net SF: 0 Quality: Average Perimeter: Condition: CM -Typical Percent Complete: 100% BItAs Order #: HVAC Type: Year Blt: UnAdjBase $1sf: Perim Mult: MH Wa l l Mult: *Fndation $lsf: Sprinkler $/sf: MH Skirt $: 1 None 2001 0.00 0.0000 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 BItAs Desc: Parking Lot *Code Exterior/Class: None Adj Year Blt: Cost Mult: # Stories Mult: *HVAC $lsf: *Roof $/sf: Sprinkler sf: MH Skirt Inft: 2001 1.0000 0.0000 0.00 0.00 0 0 * These $lsf Adjustments include all Multipliers Story Ht: Local Mult: Story Ht Mult: `Floor $lsf: `Energy $lsf: Sprinkler RCN: MH Skirt RCN: 8 1.0000 0.0000 0.00 0.00 $0 0.00 BItAs SF: 1 No. of Stories: 1.00 BItAs Units: 0 Base $ISF: 0.00 MH Tag Mult: 1.0000 *Interior $/sf: 0.00 Adj Base $lsf: 0.00 BItAs RCN: $0 Total BItAs RCN: $0 AddCode: Detail Type: Detail Description: Units: $/Unit: RCN: Ovrde: Ovrd $: 843 Add On Asphalt Average 221,400 $2.53 $560,142 $156,750 Total Detail RCN = RCN + Override RCN: $560,142 Plumbing Adjust: $0 Rough -In Adjust: $0 Imp Attribute Type: Imp Attribute Description: Imp Attribute Adj: Adjustment Type: Replacement Cost New ($): Percent Complete (x): RCN x Perc Complete ($): Amateur Adj Value (-): Design Adj Value (+): Exterior Adj Value (+): Interior Adj Value (+): Functional Obs Value (-): Economic Obs Value (-): Other Obs Value (-): Physical Depr Value (-): Landscaping Cost (+): RCN Less Depr (=): Condo Percent (x): RCNLD x Condo Perc ($): Percent $ Amount $560,142 100.00% $0 $560,142 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% 0.00% $0 $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 56.00% $313,680 $0 $246,462 100.00% $0 $246,462 RCN Less Depr ($): NBHD Adj (x): Market Adjusted Cost (_): Quality Adjustment (x): Property Type Adj (_): Adj Cost before Attrib (_): Total Mult Attrib (x): Total Additive Attrib (+): Final Adjusted Cost (_): Adjustments to RCNLD Factor $ Amount $246,462 1.00 $0 1.00 $246,462 $0 1.00 $0 $246,462 1.00 $0 $0 $246,462 Page 1of1 9 Weld Cost Breakdown Sheet Tax Year: 2019 Parcel #: 1207-23-2-02-002 Account R7051998 # of Buildings: 1 Report Date: 08/02/2019 Imp #: 1 N BH D: Commercial - 3925 - 00 Imp Gross SF: 1 Imp Net SF: 0 Quality: Average Perimeter: Condition: CM -Typical Percent Complete: 100% BItAs Order #: HVAC Type: Year Blt: UnAdjBase $1sf: Perim Mult: MH Wa l l Mult: *Fndation $lsf: Sprinkler $/sf: MH Skirt $: 1 None 2002 0.00 0.0000 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 BItAs Desc: Parking Lot *Code Exterior/Class: None Adj Year Blt: Cost Mult: # Stories Mult: *HVAC $lsf: *Roof $/sf: Sprinkler sf: MH Skirt Inft: 2002 1.0000 0.0000 0.00 0.00 0 0 * These $lsf Adjustments include all Multipliers Story Ht: Local Mult: Story Ht Mult: `Floor $lsf: `Energy $lsf: Sprinkler RCN: MH Skirt RCN: 8 1.0000 0.0000 0.00 0.00 $0 0.00 BItAs SF: 1 No. of Stories: 1.00 BItAs Units: 0 Base $/SF: 0.00 MH Tag Mult: 1.0000 *Interior $/sf: 0.00 Adj Base $lsf: 0.00 BItAs RCN: $0 Total BItAs RCN: $0 AddCode: Detail Type: Detail Description: Units: $f U n it: RCN: Ovrd e: Ovrd $: 843 Add On Asphalt Average 4Q500 $2.53 $102,465 $30,225 10676 Add On Crushed Asphalt/Gravel 144,500 $1.00 $144,500 $0 Total Detail RCN = RCN + Override RCN: $246,965 Plumbing Adjust: $0 Rough -In Adjust: $0 Imp Attribute Type: Imp Attribute Description: Imp Attribute Adj: Adjustment Type: Replacement Cost New ($): Percent Complete (x): RCN x Perc Complete ($): Amateur Adj Value (-): Design Adj Value (+): Exterior Adj Value (+): Interior Adj Value (+): Functional Obs Value (-): Economic Obs Value (-): Other Obs Value (-): Physical Depr Value (-): Landscaping Cost (+): RCN Less Depr (=): Condo Percent (x): RCNLD x Condo Perc ($): Percent $ Amount $246,965 100.00% $0 $246,965 0.00% RCN Less Depr ($): $0 NBHD Adj (x): 0.00% $0 Market Adjusted Cost (_): 0.00% $0 0.00% 0.00% $0 $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 56.68% $139,982 $0 $106,983 100.00% $0 $106,983 Quality Adjustment (x): Property Type Adj (_): Adj Cost before Attrib (_): Total Mult Attrib (x): Total Additive Attrib (+): Final Adjusted Cost (_): Adjustments to RCNLD Factor $ Amount $106,983 1.00 $0 1.00 $106:983 $0 1.00 $0 $106,983 1.00 $0 $0 $106,983 Page 1of1 10 Summary of Improvement Values for Cost Approach R7052198 Imp # 1 2 Grand Total: R7052 098 Imp # 1 Grand Total: R7051998Im# 1 Grand Total: RCN $760,487 $262,080 $1,022,567 RCN $560,142 $560,142 RCN $246,965 $246,965 RCNLD $637,790 $259,459 $897,249 RCNLD $246,462 $246,462 RCNLD $106,983 $106,983 ActualCost Value $637,790 $259,459 $897,249 ActualCost Value $246,4b2 $246,462 ActualCost Value $106,983 X106,983 Land Value $2,415,465 or $3.25 per Land SF + Improvement Value X1,250,694 Total Value by Cost Approach Final Value $3,666,159 or $276 per improvement SF 11 Market Approach Summary Real Property for the tax year 2019 must be valued utilizing data for the period one and one-half years immediately prior to June 30, 2018. If comparable valuation data is not available from such one and one- half year period to adequately determine the level of value for a class of property, the period of five years immediately prior to June 30, 2018 shall be utilized to determine the level of value. The Assessor has appropriately considered the Market Approach to value for the property on appeal. The Sales Comparison Approach was considered in developing a market value for the Subject. Sales used to establish a market value for the tax year 2019 are from January 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018. Pursuant to 39-1-104 (10.2)(c) C. R. S., the Assessor may utilize sales five years prior to June 30, 2018 to establish the proper value. All sales have been confirmed and verified through transfer declarations as well as interviews with buyers, sellers or their representatives to the sale. All sales used are arm's length transactions, and considered to be the most comparable properties sold in relationship to the Subject property. 12 Market Comparables Parcel Number Situs Sale Date Sale Price Adj SP Acct # Occupancy # of Bldgs Imp SF Yr Built Per Imp SF Subject 1207-23-2-02-004 4075 CAMELOT CIR, WELD 06/09/2017 $3,500,000 $3,500,000 R7052198 Office Building, Mini Whse 2 13,285 2000 Comparable 1 1207-23-2-02-004 4075 CAMELOT CIR , WELD 06/09/2017 $3,500,000 $3,500,000 87052198 Office Building 1 6,085 2000 $575.18 Comparable 2 1313-10-1-00-048 10633 W1-25 FRONTAGE RD , WELD 11/21/2017 $3,095,700 $3,095,700 R8943100 Equipment Building, 5 18,699 1967 $165.55 Service Garage, Util Bldg Comparable 3 1313-11-3-13-002 10200 E I-25 FRONTAGE RD,FIRESTONE 09/10/2014 $2,000,000 $1,999,000 R6786628 Indust Lght Manufacturing 1 9,718 1980 $205.80 Comparable 4 0182132101001 2550 LAREDO ST, AURORA, CO 03/27/2018 $3,900,000 $3,900,000 80164249 Paved lot N/A Comparable 1 is the subject itself at 4075 Camelot Circle. This is made up of 3 parcels totaling 17.06 acres or 743,220 sf. On R7052198, it had one building when purchased on 6/9/2017. Comparable 2 is Lazy Days RV at 10633 W1-25 Frontage Rd and is approximately 7 miles south of the Subject and is west of I-25. It has a total of 5 buildings and is 5.71 acres in size. Comparable 3 is 10200 E1-25 Frontage Rd and is approximately 7 miles south of the Subject and is east of I-2 5. It had one building that was in poor condition at the time of purchase and 21.66 acres in size. Comparable 4 is 2550 Laredo St in Aurora south of I-70 near Denver International Airport that is an asphalt paved lot used for Boat and RV Storage. This is 12.80 acres in size and has no buildings. Based upon investigation and analysis, it is the opinion of the appraisers that the value of $3,730,700 or $281 per SF accurately reflects the market value of the subject property. Value As Indicated By Market Approach $3,730,700 or $281 per SF Income Approach To Value The basic steps in the Income Approach to value for commercial properties in mass appraisal are based on a landlord -tenant situation and not on the income of the actual business. In using this approach, it eliminates the possibility of valuing management as opposed to the potential income of the structure. This is the proper method Assessor's must utilize through the Directives of the Division of Property Taxation. Income Approach Steps 1. Estimate potential gross income to the landlord. 2. Deduct typical vacancy and collection loss. 3. Add additional miscellaneous income. 4. Determine typical landlord operating expenses. 5. Deduct operating expenses to determine the landlord's operating income. 6. Determine a proper capitalization rate. 7. Capitalize the net income into an estimated property value. Research has been done by the Assessor to determine the typical rent by location, type of structure and the property use. The Weld County Assessor's office has also researched the typical landlord expenses, additional income based on the type of business, and vacancy and collection loss. An Income Approach has been completed for the subject. The Weld County Assessor has appropriately considered the Income Approach to value for the Subject property on appeal. The Assessor has gathered income information from local commercial properties for the time frame of January 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018. This information, combined with statewide and industry -wide data, is used to determine typical income and expenses for various property types. In conclusion of the Income Approach, the Assessor has considered both groups of data and has put more emphasis on the local factors and data than the state and national data. This information was then applied to the subject property to arrive at an appropriate Income Approach Value. Total Value by Income Approach $3,731,822 or $281 per SF 15 Outdoor RV Storage Office Office Mini Warehouse Vacancy Expenses Management Reserves Total N0I Elf Cap Rate Indicated Value 5% 5% 3% $23,847.50 $22,655 $13,593 $36,248 0.112 $370,000 $55,950 $51,000 $476,950 $453,103 $416,854 $3,731,822 The rental income was given to the Assessor's office from the owners. Conclusion Real property for tax year 2019 must be valued utilizing the level of value for the period of one and one- half years immediately prior to July 1, 2018. Except that, if comparable valuation data is not available from such one -and one -half -year period to adequately determine the level of value of a class of property. The period of five years immediately prior to June 30, 2018 shall be utilized to determine the level of value. Said level of value shall be adjusted to the final day of the data gathering period. Changes occurring between base years are not to be accounted for until the following level of value is implemented, other than additions, change in use, detrimental acts of nature, damage due to fire, etc., or creation of a condominium, or any new regulations restricting or increasing the use of the land, or a combination thereof. {39-1-104(11)(b)(1) C. R .S.} The subject property has been classified as Commercial Property for assessment purposes. Commercial property value shall be determined by appropriate consideration of the Cost Approach, Market Approach, and Income Approach to value. {39-1-103(5)(a) C. R. S.} The Assessor has considered all three approaches to value for the subject parcel on appeal. Final Reconciliation After consideration of the cost, market and income approaches, it is the Weld County Assessor's opinion that the value of $3,730,700, most accurately reflects the value of the subject property in Weld County for the 2019 tax year. Cost Approach $3,666,159 $276 per SF Market Approach $3,730,700 $281 per SF Assessor's Indicated Value COMMERCIAL 3,730,700 TOTAL: $3,730,700 IncomeApproach $3,731,822 $281 per SF $281 per SF 17 The subject is Camelot Storage located in Rademacher Business Park north of Highway 66 and east of 1-25 near Mead. This is comprised of three parcels that were valued as one economic unit. As they are valued as one economic unit, this page will have all approaches to value and each parcel's valuation. R7051998 MARKET $821,203 22% ALLOCATED INCOME $821,450 COST $821,203 R7052098 $1,179,124 32% $1,179,479 $1,179,124 87052198 $1,730,373 46% $1,730,893 $1,555,832 TOTAL. $3,730,700 $3,731,822 $3,666,159 18 Thank you for submitting an appeal to the Weld County Board of Equalization. We will review the information submitted and you will receive a date to appear before the board. Contact Information: Contact Name: David Lee Contact Email: DPLEE67@GMAIL.COM Contact Phone: 720-319-3489 Appeal Submitted: 01:12 PM July 15, 2019 Appeal submitted for: R7052198 - CAMELOT STORAGE LLC 4075 CAMELOT CIR, WELD Legal: RAD L4 BLK1 RADEMACHER BUSINESS PARK PUD AMD PLAT Reason: Value Too High - We are currently working on our documentation for this property. Estimate of Value: $18,710.00 You have selected the following Date Preferences: `'Monday, August 5, 2019, from 10:30 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. Friday, August 2, 2019, from 1:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. Friday, August 2, 2019, from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. Thursday, August 1, 2019, from 1:30 p.m. to 3:30 p.m. Thursday, August 1, 2019, from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. The Appeal process can take several weeks for us to complete. You will receive a written decision on your appeal within five (5) working days of your hearing. We thank you for your submittal. Weld County Board of Equalization 2019-3104 ASO 1O3 July 26, 2019 Petitioner: CAMELOT STORAGE LLC 9220 W 26TH AVE LAKEWOOD, CO 80215-1627 CLERK TO THE BOARD PHONE (970) 400-4226 FAX (970) 336-7233 WEBSITE: www.weldgov.com 1150 O STREET P.O. BOX 758 GREELEY CO 80632 Agent (if applicable): RE: THE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 2019, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO NOTIFICATION OF HEARING SCHEDULED Docket 2019-3104, AS0103 Appeal 2008224783 Hearing 8/5/2019 10:30 AM Account(s) Appealed: R7052198 Dear Petitioner(s): The Weld County Board of Equalization has set a date of August 5, 2019, at or about the hour of 10:30 AM, to hold a hearing on your valuation for assessment. This hearing will be held at the Weld County Administration Building, Assembly Room, 1150 O Street, Greeley, Colorado. You have a right to attend this hearing and present evidence in support of your petition. The Weld County Assessor or his designee will be present. The Board will make its decision on the basis of the record made at the aforementioned hearing, as well as your petition, so it would be in your interest to have a representative present. If you plan to be represented by an agent or an attorney at your hearing, prior to the hearing you shall provide, in writing to the Clerk to the Board's Office, an authorization for the agent or attorney to represent you. If you do not choose to attend this hearing, a decision will still be made by the Board by the close of business on August 5, 2019, and mailed to you within five (5) business days. Because of the volume of cases before the Board of Equalization, most cases shall be limited to 10 minutes. Also due to volume, cases cannot be rescheduled. It is imperative that you provide evidence to support your position. This may include evidence that similar homes in your area are valued less than yours or you are being assessed on improvements you do not have. Please note: The fact that your valuation has increased cannot be your sole basis of appeal. Without documented evidence as indicated above, the Board will have no choice but to deny your appeal. If you wish to discuss your value with the Assessor's Office, please call them at (970) 400-3650. If you wish to obtain the data supporting the Assessor's valuation of your property, please submit a written request to assessor@weldgov.com. Upon receipt ofyourwritten request, the Assessor will notify you of the estimated cost of providing such information. Payment must be made prior to the Assessor providing such information, at which time the Assessor will make the data available within three (3) working days, subject to any confidentiality requirements. Please advise me if you decide not to keep your appointment as scheduled. If you need any additional information, please call me at your convenience. Very truly yours, BOARD OF EQUALIZATION Esther E. Gesick Clerk to the Board Weld County Board of Commissioners and Board of Equalization cc: Brenda Danes, Assessor Hello